UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

Commission File Number 000-50327

iPass Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

3800 Bridge Parkway

Redwood Shores, California 94065

(Address, including zip code, of principal executive offices)

(650) 232-4100

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value

      Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.     Yes o          No þ

      Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.     Yes o          No þ

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes þ          No o

      Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.     o

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o          Accelerated filer þ          Non-accelerated filer o

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).     Yes o          No þ

      Aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based upon the closing price of a share of the registrant’s common stock on June 30, 2005 as reported by the Nasdaq National Market on that date: $339,543,717. The determination of affiliate status for the purposes of this calculation is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes. The calculation excludes approximately 12,443,493 shares held by directors, officers and stockholders whose ownership exceeded five percent of the registrant’s outstanding Common Stock as of June 30, 2005. Exclusion of these shares should not be construed to indicate that such person controls, is controlled by or is under common control with the registrant.

      The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s Common Stock, $0.001 par value, as of February 28, 2006 was 64,567,835.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

      Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement in connection with our 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than April 30, 2006, are incorporated by reference in Part III, Items 10-14 of this report on Form 10-K.

iPASS INC.

FORM 10-K

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

      This annual report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements regarding future events and our future results that are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, and projections about the industries in which we operate and the beliefs and assumptions of our management. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “targets,” “goals,” “projects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” variations of such words, and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements which refer to projections of our future financial performance, our anticipated growth and trends in our business, and other characterizations of future events or circumstances, are forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual results may differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. Readers are directed to risks and uncertainties identified below, under “Factors Affecting Operating Results” in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere herein, for factors that may cause actual results to be different than those expressed in these forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made, and except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason.

PART I

Overview

      We are a global provider of software-enabled enterprise connectivity and endpoint management services for remote and mobile workers. Our flagship service offering, iPass Corporate Access^tm, is designed to enable enterprises to provide their employees with secure internet and corporate network connectivity over any access network through a single easy-to-use interface. iPass Corporate Access unifies access through over 300 networks in over 160 countries that make up the iPass global virtual network. It also gives customers the option to use the service for access over networks that are not yet part of the iPass global virtual network such as enterprise home broadband and on-campus wireless local area networks (LANs) as well as third-party Wi-Fi hotspot, municipal Wi-Fi networks and hotel Ethernet links.

      In addition, we provide endpoint management services that enable better protection of an enterprises’ remote and mobile computer systems, or endpoints. These services, which include device authentication, patch automation and systems management, can be used in conjunction with iPass Corporate Access or on a stand-alone basis. Fundamental to all iPass services is enabling the IT Manager to maintain direct control of the determination and application of policies as part of a self-service management process.

      As opposed to traditional telecommunications companies that build, operate and maintain network facilities, we have created a virtual network as the platform for our services. Our virtual network is based on a software architecture that gives it technology flexibility and cost-effective scalability. It comprises contractual relationships and technical integrations with over 300 telecommunications carriers, Internet service providers and other network service providers around the globe. This architecture has redundancy built in throughout, from multiple network providers in most countries to fault-tolerance mechanisms at all points in the authentication process. This allows it to deliver extremely high availability of service to our customers. In fact, since 2000, there has been no system down-time that impacted the platform and the services that it provides.

      In addition, our architecture allows customers to gain better control of remote and mobile connectivity while also simplifying their back-end operations. Customers can configure and enforce policies around network access based on financial and security considerations. They also receive centralized delivery of detailed billing, reporting and management information.

      We derive revenues from usage of our networks and from fees and other services. Our usage revenues are generated by providing enterprise connectivity services to customers using narrowband access technologies, such as modem dial-up, and from broadband access technologies, including Ethernet and Wireless-Fidelity (Wi-Fi) and Mobile Data Services such as 1xRTT and EV-DO. Revenues pertaining to usage represented 87% of our total revenues in 2005. Additionally, we receive revenue from fees and other services, including authentication services for channel partners, value-added reporting services and endpoint systems management services. In 2005 we generated approximately 13% of our revenues from fees and other services. We market and sell our services directly, as well as indirectly through channel partners, including network service providers, Internet service providers, systems integrators and value-added resellers. We were incorporated in California in July 1996 and reincorporated in Delaware in June 2000.

Our Strategy

      Our objective is to use our software-enabled virtual network to become the leading provider of secure enterprise connectivity services worldwide. The key elements of our strategy to achieve this objective include:

      Expand our Enterprise Customer Base. We seek to increase the number of enterprises that use our services by leveraging our direct sales professionals and channel partners who focus on generating new

accounts. We also seek to expand our indirect sales capabilities by building additional relationships with channel partners, such as systems integrators, providers of security products (i.e. virtual private networks (VPN), personal firewalls and intrusion detection) and providers of broadband access service equipment. We also intend to build and maintain iPass brand awareness through the promotion of our brand through marketing campaigns, our web presence, and our large installed base of branded client software, and to increase our market reach through integration of our back-end software and client software with the offerings of our channel partners.

      Increase User Penetration within our Existing Customer Base. We seek to accelerate the adoption of our services by increasing usage of our services from the highly mobile business travelers who dominate our current user base to all customer employees who use laptop and handheld mobile devices. This we intend to achieve through the sale of services related to non-iPass networks, such as enterprise home broadband and on-campus wireless LANs as well as third party Wi-Fi hotspot, municipal Wi-Fi networks and hotel Ethernet links. Additionally, we will promote our endpoint management services into our existing customer base.

      Within customers who only have implemented our services in a single division we endeavor to broaden service adoption to all other operating units of the enterprise. A key function of our sales force is to assist our customers with the adoption and integration of our services with their organizations, continually assess the customers evolving needs, offer new services for adoption, and provide ongoing support.

      Continue to Expand our Wired and Wireless Broadband Coverage and Service Offerings. We believe that the improved security, ease of use and management control that our services provide can address many of the challenges presented by the emerging broadband markets, such as wireless security, lack of unified roaming standards and increased complexity driven by provider fragmentation. As such, we seek to continually expand the broadband coverage of our virtual network to venues attractive to business travelers, such as airports, hotels, convention centers, cafes, restaurants, and other retail locations. We intend to continue increasing the number of these venues by establishing relationships with network service providers that provide access to these hotspots. We also plan to expand the network coverage through mobile data services based on 2.5G and 3G networks, that can help to keep these end users connected when a hotspot venue is not convenient. We also seek to continue evolving our back-end authentication, settlement and clearinghouse capabilities to support this expansion, developing our client software to simplify the user experience, and improving our management capabilities to unify management control for our customers.

      Continue to Enhance our Virtual Network. We intend to continue to establish new relationships with network service providers to increase the coverage and redundancy of our virtual network. We intend to enhance the functionality and features of our software architecture and to address changing customer requirements and technologies through internal development, strategic partnerships and/or acquisitions. We also seek to expand our service offerings by supporting and integrating new access methods, devices, applications and operating systems, and by building additional relationships with systems integrators and technology providers and develop services that effectively leverage an enterprise’s existing infrastructure. We also intend to explore additional managed services that enhance our competitive advantage and provide us with new growth opportunities.

      Leverage and Extend our Endpoint Management Capabilities. In order to deepen the value we provide to customers, we intend to continue to improve the endpoint management and policy enforcement capabilities of our services through both extension of our platform to new functions that serve to protect identities, endpoints, the network, and user data as well as integrate with technology partners in the enterprise security industry.

Our Core Capabilities

      Our services are designed to enable enterprises to provide their employees with secure access from approximately 160 countries to the internet and an enterprise’s internal networks through a single easy-to-use interface. We provide our services through a virtual network that is enabled by our software-based network architecture and our contractual relationships with over 300 network service providers around the globe.

      Our core assets and capabilities include:

      Global Virtual Network. Our virtual network aggregates over 70,000 access points in approximately 160 countries. As of December 31, 2005, over 31,000 of these access points were dial-up connections and approximately 38,000 were broadband connections, comprised of approximately 36,000 Wi-Fi hotspots and approximately 2,000 wired hotspots as well as a North American CDMA footprint. As a result, enterprises that use our services can provide their remote and mobile workers with access from these countries, in most instances with a local telephone or broadband connection.

      High-Availability and Scalable Authentication Architecture. Our relationships with over 300 network service providers enable us to provide connectivity through multiple networks in approximately 120 out of the approximately 160 countries on our virtual network. As a result, our virtual network reduces the risk of service interruptions associated with depending on only one service provider. Furthermore, our geographically distributed transaction centers act as a unified and fault-tolerant system that provides scalable and highly-available user authentication and quality management information collection. Each point in the authentication process is designed with built-in redundancy and fail-over capabilities. There has been no system down-time that impacted the platform and the services that it provides since 2000.

      This architecture also makes our virtual network scalable, allowing us to handle many connections and users without a proportionate increase in capital expenditures.

      Flexible Enterprise Security Integration. Our software is designed to enable integration between an enterprise’s network connectivity infrastructure and a wide variety of enterprise security applications. Our services integrate a breadth of security software and systems, including VPNs, personal firewall, anti-virus and authentication systems, enabling enterprises to rapidly deploy our services while leveraging their existing and future investments in security infrastructure.

      Authentication Security. Unlike many network service providers, we securely route all credentials relating to our end users with 128-bit Secure Socket Layer, or SSL, protocols, ensuring the confidentiality of sensitive user information as it traverses the Internet. To defend against identity theft, an additional layer of authentication using 131-bit ECC cryptography protects user credentials from the device over the local access link into the iPass virtual network.

      Network Access Policy Management. Our virtual network also offers policy management capabilities, enabling customers to allow or deny access to their network based on specific user and session characteristics. The characteristics may be based on the user’s location, the user’s identity and role within the organization, the type of access network being used, and the compliance of the user’s computer with enterprise security policies.

      Endpoint Policy Management. We have software services that allow for flexible and automated systems management capabilities, with specific advantages with regards to endpoint systems used by remote and mobile workers. The capabilities can be used for device discovery, asset management, device configuration, and software distribution. These capabilities can be hosted on servers at our customer’s premises or in an iPass data center and are supported by an agent software that runs on the mobile worker’s device.

      Centralized Billing and Management Reporting. We integrate the networks of multiple service providers to create one global virtual network, eliminating the need for enterprises to negotiate agreements with multiple network service providers to provide network connectivity to their mobile workers. Our virtual network creates call detail records (CDRs) for each network session, including user, date, time, duration of usage and other parameters. We are also able to provide detailed transaction-level billing in a single invoice for all services provided to enterprises and network service providers and can tailor the invoice to provide the level of detail and the format that our customers desire. We also offer the ability for information technology managers to gain a comprehensive and near real-time view of their employees’ network connectivity usage patterns, enabling faster identification and resolution of user-related issues.

      Our technology enables us to deliver producing near real-time information of connection success rates, client configurations, authentication times and other information critical to diagnosing network health and

troubleshooting user connection problems. This patented capability is used internally to manage network provider quality as well to provide in-depth reporting to customers for trouble-shooting purposes.

      Integration of New Technologies. We actively evaluate and integrate support for new access methods, devices, applications and operating systems into our service offering. For example, we support wired broadband, wireless broadband based on the current and emerging Wi-Fi standards, as well as 3G mobile data services. End users can access our virtual network using desktop and laptop computers, wireless handheld devices and other Internet Protocol (IP) enabled electronic devices. Our network integrates with our enterprise customers’ existing VPN and security applications, and our software supports a wide range of computer operating systems, including various versions of Microsoft’s Windows^®, Apple’s Mac OS, and Microsoft’s Windows Mobile versions for handheld devices.

Services

      iPass Corporate Access is our primary service, offering our customers the ability to provide global dial-up, wired broadband and wireless access to their remote and mobile workers through the iPassConnect universal client and centralized management and billing for the IT department. We generally bill customers based on usage of the iPass virtual network, as well as additional monthly fees based on number of users for use of our client and management software over non-iPass networks. The process by which a mobile worker accesses their enterprise network through iPass virtual network is illustrated in the following diagram and described through the following steps:

      In addition to iPass Corporate Access, we currently offer the following services:

      iOQ. We have developed our iOQ service to allow our customers’ in-house or outsourced help desk personnel to quickly identify issues and troubleshoot connection problems. With our iOQ service, enterprises can generate records and reports regarding access locations, client configuration, error codes, connection speeds, time to authenticate and other critical information. We generally charge a monthly fee for our iOQ service. We periodically update the iOQ software in order to provide improved reporting for our internal support organization and our customers. These upgrades are downloaded to the user’s computer or other electronic device when the user logs in, at no additional cost to the customer.

      ExpressConnect. Our ExpressConnect service is designed to enable enterprises to realize the benefits of our enterprise connectivity services while avoiding the cost of installing and managing additional authentication infrastructure. We manage an enterprise’s authentication server in one of our secure data centers, but the enterprise’s information technology manager retains full control. There is an additional option in ExpressConnect that allows the individual charges to be directly charged to their corporate credit card. We generally charge a monthly fee for our ExpressConnect service.

      Wireless LAN Roaming. Our Wireless LAN Roaming service is an add-on option to the iPass Corporate Access service that extends its benefits to connections over on-campus Wi-Fi LANs. This service allows enterprise IT departments to offer a single user experience for all remote and local wireless connections while extending centralized management of security policies to these potentially vulnerable corporate wireless networks. We generally charge a monthly fee for our Wireless LAN Roaming service.

      DeviceID. The DeviceID service strengthens network security through device authentication. This service creates a digital fingerprint for every device by gathering unique identifying numbers from select hardware components and uses this information when interrogating the device to provide access to the corporate LAN via a VPN. DeviceID helps protect against replay attacks, reverse engineering and spoofing by checking different hardware attributes during each authentication request. This service is designed to ensure that only corporate-issued or authorized machines access the network as well as validate device identity as an additional factor for VPN authentication.

      Endpoint Policy Management — Online. This iPass-hosted service links automated security assessment, remediation and patch management capabilities into the iPass Corporate Access service. When users attempt to use the iPassConnect universal client to connect to the Internet and the corporate VPN, the Endpoint Policy Management — Online service will check to see that the user’s computer is running the proper versions of Microsoft Windows OS patches and anti-virus definition file updates for endpoint devices — prior to Internet access and the launching the VPN. This helps mitigate the effects of viruses and worms.

      Endpoint Policy Management — Enterprise (formerly Mobile Lifecycle Management Suite.) This service helps enterprise customers to discover, secure, and manage their laptops, desktops and handheld devices from any location via a single management console. This service is driven by iPass server software and resides on the enterprise network. It is sold either on a per-seat fee-based model or through a perpetual license model with annually occurring maintenance fees.

      Endpoint Policy Management — Enterprise includes the following features:

      The technology incorporated in our services is designed to provide our customers with reliability, quality of service, network security, policy enforcement, consolidated billing and scalability. Our technology consists of the following four principal components, each of which was designed and developed internally: iPassConnect universal client; distributed authentication system; iPass Clearinghouse; and Service Quality Management.

      iPassConnect Universal Client. The iPassConnect universal client software is installed on mobile workers’ laptop computers or other devices, and allows them to securely and reliably connect to the Internet using a variety of access methods including narrowband, integrated services digital network, or ISDN, wired and wireless broadband, GSM and 3G. The iPassConnect universal client is designed to be easy-to-use and to

be a flexible and scalable network connectivity platform for enterprises. The key features of iPassConnect include:

      Distributed and Redundant Authentication System. Our distributed authentication system, which is made up of iPass NetServer software, iPass RoamServer software and iPass TransactionServer software, is designed to enable the reliable, scalable and secure initiation and termination of a remote access session on our virtual network. NetServer is installed on the servers of our network service providers. RoamServer is installed on our enterprise customer’s internal networks, typically located on their premises. Our ten transaction centers, each of which is comprised of two or more transaction servers, are located in third party co-location facilities.

      The software components of NetServer, RoamServer and the transaction server operate on third party single-or multi-processor servers based on Unix, Linux, or Windows. We send our enterprise customers updates to NetServer, RoamServer and the transaction server electronically on an as needed basis to support new authentication and management needs.

      iPass NetServer software receives end user authentication requests for Internet connectivity and securely forwards the request to a transaction server across a 128-bit SSL connection. The iPass transaction server validates the request and securely forwards this request to a RoamServer located at the enterprise. The RoamServer receives the authentication request for Internet connectivity and forwards the request in a format compatible with the enterprise’s authentication database. Once the enterprise authentication database has allowed or denied the end user’s request for access, this reply is returned along the same route.

      We have recently developed and are presently deploying an additional security enhancement to our authentication system designed to further ensure the confidentiality of sensitive user credentials.

      iPass Clearinghouse. Our iPass Clearinghouse software collects, filters, resolves, analyzes and summarizes the accounting details necessary to bill for the iPass Corporate Access and ExpressConnect services. Once an end user session is terminated, the Clearinghouse retrieves accounting records for each customer from each transaction server. Once received by the Clearinghouse, the records are filtered to eliminate duplicate records and reviewed for completeness and integrity of the data. The Clearinghouse then determines the identities of both the customer and the network service provider and generates two billing records to reflect

the revenues and network access expenses based on the details contained in the original accounting record. The Clearinghouse then summarizes the records of each network service provider and generates and distributes customer call detail records and invoices. The Clearinghouse software is run internally on servers residing at a secure data center in Redwood City, California, with a fail-over and disaster recovery in a separate location.

      Service Quality Management. Our iPass service quality management, or SQM, software consists of several quality-of-service monitoring and management elements that we incorporated into our services. These tools and processes are comprised of the following:

      Our ten Transaction Centers are located in third-party co-location facilities in California, New York, Georgia, Hong Kong, Australia, the United Kingdom, The Netherlands, Germany, Japan and Brazil. Three additional co-location facilities are utilized to host our primary Clearinghouse and Finance systems, and corporate web services, which are located in California. Three out of our ten transaction centers also run the standby and disaster recovery Clearinghouse environments, our ExpressConnect service and the phonebook distribution servers. We maintain standard contractual agreements with the third parties that host our co-location facilities which generally provide for a term of between one and three years. If our relationships with these providers terminate, we believe that we will be able to secure relationships with alternative providers without any significant disruption to our operations.

Customers

      We sell our service offering directly to enterprise customers and indirectly though channel partners.

      International revenue accounted for approximately 45%, 41% and 39% of total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Revenues generated in the United Kingdom accounted for 14% and 11% of total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. No individual foreign country represented 10% or more of total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2003. International revenue is determined by the location of the customer’s headquarters.

      Substantially all of our long-lived assets are located in the United States.

Agreements with Network Service Providers

      We have relationships with over 300 telecommunications carriers, Internet service providers and other network service providers that enable us to offer our services in over 160 countries around the world. We pay

network service providers for access to their network access points on a usage basis, in some cases, subject to minimum purchase commitments. Most of these contracts have a term of one year, after which either party can terminate the contract with six months notice. In 2005, two network service providers, MCI and Equant, accounted for approximately 9% and 6% of our network access expenses, respectively. The contracts we have entered into with these providers are non-exclusive and contain minimum commitments for the purchase of network access. Our contract with Equant expires in February 2007. The initial term of our contract with MCI expired in November 2005. The contract with MCI is automatically renewed for successive periods of one or 12 month periods unless terminated by either party. In countries in which we have contracted with multiple network service providers, if one network service provider is no longer available, we can generally obtain alternative network access without significant disruption to our business. We are also able to direct users to the network of particular service providers to fulfill minimum purchase commitments.

Sales and Marketing

      We sell our services directly through our sales force and indirectly through our channel partners. Our sales organization is organized into regional account teams, which include sales directors, sales managers, account executives, account managers, inside sales representatives, sales engineers and sales operations personnel. We maintain sales offices or personnel in a number of cities in the United States as well as Australia, the United Kingdom, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Germany, France, Singapore, Denmark, Sweden and The Netherlands. As of December 31, 2005, our sales organization was comprised of 95 individuals in North America, 22 individuals in Asia Pacific and 42 individuals in Europe. We intend to increase the size of our sales organization and establish additional sales offices as needed.

      Our channel partners include network service providers, systems integrators and value added resellers. A channel partner typically signs a one to two year agreement with us through which we appoint the partner as a nonexclusive reseller of our services. Channel partners are responsible for implementing and managing billing and promotional activities for their customers. Selling through channel partners allows us to offer our services without incurring the cost of maintaining a direct sales force in each target market. Our channel partners typically sell related networking products and bundle our services with their core offerings. Once an enterprise has signed a contract for our services through a channel partner, our post-sales team works with the channel partner to ensure successful implementation of our services. However, the enterprise remains the channel partner’s customer and has no direct financial relationship with us.

      We focus our marketing efforts on creating awareness for our services and their applications, educating potential customers and generating new sales opportunities. We conduct a variety of marketing programs including advertising, press relations, analyst relations, telemarketing, direct marketing, web and e-mail marketing, collateral and sales tools creation, seminars, events and trade shows.

Competition

      We compete primarily with large, facilities-based carriers and non-facilities-based software-enabled network operators. We compete based on geographic coverage, reliability, quality of service, ease of implementation, ease of use and cost. We believe that we compete favorably in terms of geographical coverage, reliability, quality of service, ease of implementation and ease of use.

      Facilities-based carriers against whom we compete, such as AT&T globally, Verizon Business (formerly MCI) in the US and BT Infonet and Equant in Europe, generally have substantially greater resources, larger customer bases, longer operating histories, and greater name recognition than we have. Carriers may have the ability to offer a broad range of services and may be willing to reduce the price for remote access that is bundled with their other services. In some cases, potential customers are also suppliers to these carriers, and may be more inclined to purchase enterprise connectivity services from these carriers than from us. We believe that we compete favorably against facilities-based carriers when the potential customer is not a supplier to the carrier, and when the customer requires global access rather than access only within a limited geographic region.

      We also compete with other non-facilities-based software-enabled network operators. In some cases, our service offerings may not be as attractively priced as those offered by our competitors, which may put us at a competitive disadvantage. We believe we compete favorably against these competitors in terms of the coverage, redundancy, security, quality and ease of use of our service offerings. Still, non- facilities-based network operators that provide managed services such as VPNs and firewalls, may also provide, as a package, additional services such as local exchange and long distance services, voicemail and DSL services. Although our channel partners may offer these services in conjunction with our service, we do not offer these additional services directly, which may put us at a competitive disadvantage when competing for potential customers.

      For a discussion of the possible effects that competition could have on our business, see “Factors Affecting Operating Results — We face strong competition in our market, which could make it difficult for us to succeed.”

Research and Development

      We believe that to compete favorably we must continue to invest in the research and development of our services. Our research and development efforts are focused on improving and enhancing our existing service offerings as well as developing new proprietary products and services. As of December 31, 2005, our research and development organization consisted of 100 employees. Our research and development expenses were $17.6 million, $13.8 million and $9.9 million in 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively.

Intellectual Property

      We rely on a combination of trademark, copyright, trade secret laws and disclosure restrictions to protect our intellectual property rights. We also enter into confidentiality and proprietary rights agreements with our employees, consultants and other third parties and control access to software, documentation and other proprietary information. iPass^®, iOQ^® and the iPass logo are our U.S. registered trademarks. iPassConnect^tm, ExpressConnect^tm, iPassNet^tm, RoamServer^tm, NetServer^tm, iPass Alliance^® and iPass Corporate Access^tm are designations that we use. We have 18 U.S. patent applications pending relating to our service. On January 21, 2003, we were issued a U.S. patent for a method and a technology relating to our SQM technology. We also obtained two U.S. patents in 2004 through the acquisition of Safe3w and Mobile Automation. The duration of a patent is 20 years from the date of issuance. We have also applied for or registered company trademarks in over 50 other countries. If a claim is asserted that we have infringed the intellectual property of a third party, we may be required to seek licenses to that technology. In addition, we license third-party technologies that are incorporated into our services, including our license for encryption granted by RSA Security. The license agreement with RSA Security expired in February 2006 and automatically renewed for an additional three-year period. This license will continue to automatically renew for additional three-year periods upon expiration, unless terminated by us or by RSA Security. Licenses from third party technologies, including our license with RSA Security, may not continue to be available to us at a reasonable cost, or at all. Additionally, the steps we have taken to protect our intellectual property rights may not be adequate. Third parties may infringe or misappropriate our proprietary rights. Competitors may also independently develop technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to the technologies we employ in our services. If we fail to protect our proprietary rights adequately, our competitors could offer similar services, potentially significantly harming our competitive position and decreasing our revenues.

Employees

      As of December 31, 2005, we had 406 employees, consisting of 65 in network operations, 100 in research and development, 192 in sales and marketing and 49 in general and administrative. We consider our relationship with our employees to be good.

Trademarks

      iPass^®, iOQ^® and the iPass logo are our U.S. registered trademarks. iPassConnect^tm, ExpressConnect^tm, iPassNet^tm, RoamServer^tm, NetServer^tm, iPass Corporate Access^tm, DeviceID^tm, EPM^tm, iSEEL^tm and iPass

Alliance^tm are designations that we use. We have also applied for or registered company trademarks in over 50 other countries.

Available Information

      Our Internet address is www.ipass.com. We make available free of charge through our Internet website our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC.

      Further, a copy of this annual report is located at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding our filings at www.sec.gov.

      Set forth below and elsewhere in this report are risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this report.

Risks Relating to Our Business

      We have generated substantially all of our usage revenues to date from the sale of enterprise connectivity services using narrowband technologies such as modem dial-up. In particular, in 2005, we derived $138.1 million, or 82% of our total revenues from our traditional dial-up business. In some countries, including the United States, the use of narrowband as a primary means of enterprise connectivity has declined and is expected to continue to decline at an accelerated rate over time as broadband access technologies, such as cable modem, DSL, Wi-Fi and other wireless technologies, including 3G, become more broadly used. In 2005, our revenue derived from the use of narrowband connectivity decreased 8% as compared to 2004. A substantial portion of the growth of our business will depend in part upon our ability to expand the broadband elements of our virtual network. Such an expansion may not result in additional revenues to us. Key challenges in expanding the broadband elements of our virtual network include:

      The broadband access market is at an early stage of development. Although we derive revenues from wired and wireless broadband “hotspots”, such as particular airports, hotels and convention centers, the broadband access market, particularly for wireless access, is at an early stage of development and demand at levels we anticipate may not develop. In particular, the market for enterprise connectivity services through broadband is characterized by evolving industry standards and specifications and there is currently no uniform standard for wireless access. We have developed and made available Wi-Fi specifications that are directed at enabling Wi-Fi access points to become ready for use by enterprise customers. If this specification is not widely adopted, market acceptance of our wireless broadband services may be significantly reduced or delayed and our business could be harmed. Furthermore, although the use of wireless frequencies generally does not require a license in the United States and abroad, if Wi-Fi frequencies become subject to licensing requirements, or are otherwise restricted, this would substantially impair the growth of wireless access. Some large telecommunications providers and other stakeholders that pay large sums of money to license other portions of the wireless spectrum may seek to have the Wi-Fi spectrum become subject to licensing restrictions. If the broadband wireless access market does not develop, we will not be able to generate substantial revenues from broadband wireless access.

      The broadband service provider market is highly fragmented. Due to the early stage of development of the broadband access market, there are currently many wired and wireless broadband service providers that provide coverage in only one or a small number of hotspots. We have entered into contractual relationships

with numerous broadband service providers. These contracts generally have an initial term of two years or less. As this process is in an early stage, we must continue to develop relationships with many providers on terms commercially acceptable to us in order to provide adequate coverage for our customers’ mobile workers and to expand our broadband coverage. We may also be required to develop additional technologies in order to integrate new broadband services into our service offering. If we are unable to develop these relationships or technologies, our ability to grow our business could be impaired. In addition, if broadband service providers consolidate, our negotiating leverage with providers may decrease, resulting in increased rates for access, which could harm our operating results.

      If demand for broadband access does not materially increase, or if demand increases but we do not meet the challenges outlined above, our ability to grow our business may suffer.

      Any failure to provide reliable network access, uninterrupted operation of our network and software infrastructure, or a satisfactory experience for our customers and their mobile workers, whether or not caused by our own failure, could reduce demand for our services. In 2002, we experienced three outages affecting our clearinghouse system, which handles invoicing to our customers and network service providers, resulting in five days of outages and eight days of work to confirm data integrity in response to the outages. Although these problems did not affect the ability of mobile workers to access our services or impact our revenues, one of these outages caused a delay in our invoicing of approximately one week. If additional outages occur, or if we experience other hardware or software problems, our business could be harmed.

     We face strong competition in our market, which could make it difficult for us to succeed.

      We compete primarily with facilities-based carriers as well as with other non-facilities-based network operators. Some of our competitors have substantially greater resources, larger customer bases, longer operating histories or greater name recognition than we have. Also, with the recent introduction of our policy management services, we face additional competition from companies that provide security and policy-based services and software. In addition, we face the following challenges from our competitors:

      Many of our competitors can compete on price. Because many of our facilities-based competitors own and operate physical networks, there may be little incremental cost for them to provide additional telephone or Internet connections. As a result, they may offer dial-up remote access services at little additional cost, and may be willing to discount or subsidize remote access services to capture other sources of revenue. In contrast, we have traditionally purchased network access from facilities-based network service providers to enable our dial-up remote access service. As a result, large carriers may sell their remote access services at a lower price. In addition, new non-facilities-based carriers may enter our market and compete on price. In either case, we may lose business or be forced to lower our prices to compete, which could reduce our revenues.

      Many of our competitors offer additional services that we do not, which enables them to compete favorably against us. Some of our competitors provide services that we do not, such as local exchange and long distance services, voicemail and digital subscriber line, or DSL, services. Potential customers that desire these services on a bundled basis may choose to obtain remote access and policy management services from the competitor that provides these additional services.

      Our potential customers may have other business relationships with our competitors and consider those relationships when deciding between our services and those of our competitors. Many of our competitors are large facilities-based carriers that purchase substantial amounts of products and services, or provide other services or goods unrelated to remote access services. As a result, if a potential customer is also a supplier to one of our large competitors, or purchases unrelated services or goods from our competitor, the potential customer may be motivated to purchase its remote access services from our competitor in order to maintain or enhance its business relationship with that competitor.

      The telecommunications industry has experienced dramatic technological change and increased competition that have led to significant declines in network access pricing. In addition, the revenues of network service providers have declined as a result of the general economic slowdown. As a result, network service providers have experienced operating difficulties in the last several years, resulting in poor operating results and a number of these providers declaring bankruptcy. As these conditions have continued, some of these service providers have consolidated and are working to consolidate or otherwise cease operations, which would reduce the number of network service providers from which we are able to obtain network access. As this occurs, while we expect that we will still be able to maintain operations and provide enterprise connectivity services with a small number of network service providers, we would potentially not be able to provide sufficient redundant access points in some geographic areas, which could diminish our ability to provide broad, reliable, redundant coverage. Further, our ability to negotiate favorable access rates from network service providers could be impaired, which could increase our network access expenses and harm our operating results.

      It is imperative for our customers that access to their mission critical data is secure. A key component of our ability to attract and retain customers is the security measures that we have engineered into our network for the authentication of the end user’s credentials; on a going forward basis, we expect an additional key component in this regard to be our policy management services. These measures are designed to protect against unauthorized access to our customers’ networks. Because techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage networks change frequently and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures against unauthorized access or sabotage. If an actual or perceived breach of network security occurs, regardless of whether the breach is attributable to our services, the market perception of the effectiveness of our security measures could be harmed. To date, we have not experienced any significant security breaches to our network.

      The growth of our business is dependent, in part, upon the increased use of enterprise connectivity services and our ability to capture a higher proportion of this market. If the demand for enterprise connectivity services does not continue to grow, then we may not be able to grow our business, maintain profitability or meet public market expectations. Increased usage of enterprise connectivity services depends on numerous factors, including:

      We expect that the growth of our business may depend in part upon whether our policy management services will achieve and sustain expected levels of demand and market acceptance. If enterprises do not

perceive the benefits of our policy management services, then the market for these services may not develop at all, or it may develop more slowly than we expect, either of which could significantly and adversely affect our growth. In addition, if demand for our policy management services does not materialize as expected, our ability to recover our investment in Safe3w, Inc. and Mobile Automation, Inc. may be impaired or delayed. In addition, because of our limited operating history relating to policy management services, we cannot predict our revenue and operating results from the provision of these services. Key challenges that we face related to our provision of these services include the risk that we may encounter unexpected technical and other difficulties in developing our policy management services which could delay or prevent the development of these services or certain features of these services; the risk that the rate of adoption by enterprises of network security software or integrated secure connectivity solutions will not be as we anticipate, which if slow would reduce or eliminate the purchase of these services; and the risk that security breaches may occur, notwithstanding the use of our policy management services, by hackers that develop new methods of avoiding security software. If we do not adequately address these challenges, our growth and operating results may be negatively impacted.

      Our business is characterized by a long sales cycle between the time a potential customer is contacted and a customer contract is signed. In addition, the downturn in the economy from early 2001 to 2003 and the resulting reduction in corporate spending on Internet infrastructure further lengthened the average sales cycle for our services. Furthermore, once a customer contract is signed, there is typically an extended period before the customer’s end users actually begin to use our services, which is when we begin to realize revenues. As a result, we may invest a significant amount of time and effort in attempting to secure a customer which may not result in any revenues. Even if we enter into a contract, we will have incurred substantial sales-related expenses well before we recognize any related revenues. If the expenses associated with sales increase, we are not successful in our sales efforts, or we are unable to generate associated offsetting revenues in a timely manner, our operating results will be harmed.

      In approximately 24 countries, our sole dial-up network service provider is Equant. Network usage from access within these countries accounted for less than 2% of our revenues for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003. If we lose access to Equant’s network and are unable to replace this access in some or all of these countries, our revenues would decline. In addition, our ability to market our services as being global would be impaired, which could cause us to lose customers. Our agreement with Equant expires in February 2007, but Equant may terminate the agreement earlier if we materially breach the contract and fail to cure the breach, or if we become insolvent. In addition, Equant has no obligation to continue to provide us with access to its network after February 2007. If Equant were to cease operations or terminate its arrangements with us, we would be required to enter into arrangements with other dial-up network service providers, which may not be available. This process could be costly and time consuming, and we may not be able to enter into these arrangements on terms acceptable to us.

      We sell our services directly through our sales force and indirectly through our channel partners, which include network service providers, systems integrators and value added resellers. Our business depends on the efforts and the success of these channel partners in marketing our services to their customers. Our own ability to promote our services directly to their customers is often limited. Many of our channel partners may offer services to their customers that may be similar to, or competitive with, our services. Therefore, these channel

partners may be reluctant to promote our services. If our channel partners fail to market our services effectively, our ability to grow our revenue would be reduced and our business will be impaired.

      The market for enterprise connectivity and policy management services is characterized by evolving industry standards and specifications and rapid technological change, including new access methods, devices, applications and operating systems. In developing and introducing our services, we have made, and will continue to make, assumptions with respect to which features, security standards, performance criteria, access methods, devices, applications and operating systems will be required or desired by enterprises and their mobile workers. If we implement technological changes or specifications that are different from those required or desired, or if we are unable to successfully integrate required or desired technological changes or specifications into our wired or wireless services, market acceptance of our services may be significantly reduced or delayed and our business could be harmed.

      Our software may contain errors that interrupt network access or have other unintended consequences. If network access is disrupted due to a software error, or if any other unintended negative results occur, such as the loss of billing information, a security breach or unauthorized access to our virtual network, our reputation could be harmed and our business may suffer. Although we generally attempt by contract to limit our exposure to incidental and consequential damages, if these contract provisions are not enforced or enforceable for any reason, or if liabilities arise that are not effectively limited, our operating results could be harmed.

      We generate a substantial portion of our revenues from business conducted internationally. Revenues from customers domiciled outside of the United States were 45% of our revenues for 2005, of which approximately 29% and 12% were generated in our EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) and Asia Pacific regions, respectively. In 2004, revenues from customers domiciled outside of the United States were 41% of our total revenues, of which approximately 24% and 13% were generated in our EMEA and Asia Pacific regions, respectively. Although we currently bill for our services in U.S. dollars, our international operations subject our business to specific risks. These risks include:

      Any of these factors could negatively impact our business.

      Integrating any newly acquired businesses, technologies or services may be expensive and time-consuming. For example, we completed the acquisitions of Safe3w, Inc. in September 2004, Mobile Automation, Inc. in October 2004 and GoRemote Internet Communications, Inc. in February 2006. To

finance any acquisitions, it may be necessary for us to raise additional funds through public or private financings. Additional funds may not be available on terms that are favorable to us and, in the case of equity financings, would result in dilution to our stockholders. In the case of completed or future acquisitions, we may be unable to operate any acquired businesses profitably or otherwise implement our strategy successfully. If we are unable to integrate any newly acquired entities, such as GoRemote Internet Communications, Inc., or technologies effectively, our operating results could suffer. Completed acquisitions by us, such as the aforementioned Safe3w, Inc., Mobile Automation, Inc. and GoRemote Internet Communications, Inc. transactions, or future acquisitions by us could also result in large and immediate write-offs or assumption of debt and contingent liabilities, either of which could harm our operating results.

      We have experienced, and in the future may continue to experience, rapid growth in operations which has placed and could continue to place, a significant strain on our network operations, development of services, internal controls and other managerial, operating, and financial resources. If we do not manage future expansion effectively, our business will be harmed. To effectively manage any future expansion, we will need to improve our operational and financial systems and managerial controls and procedures, which include the following:

      We are at risk of being subject to securities class action lawsuits if our stock price declines substantially. Securities class action litigation has often been brought against a company following a decline in the market price of its securities. For example, in June 2004, we announced that we would not meet market expectations regarding our financial performance in the second quarter, and our stock price declined. Beginning on January 14, 2005, three purported class action complaints were filed against the Company and certain of its executive officers in United States District Court for the Northern District of California, purportedly on behalf of a class of investors who purchased iPass stock between April 22, 2004 and June 30, 2004. The complaint alleges claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. On March 2, 2005, these cases were consolidated as In re iPass Securities Litigation, Case No. 3:05-cv-00228-MHP. On April 22, 2005, David Lutzke and Rhonda Lutzke were named lead plaintiffs. On July 5, 2005, plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Amended Complaint. Named as defendants together with us are Kenneth D. Denman, Donald C. McCauley, Anurag Lal and Jon M. Russo. The Consolidated Amended Complaint alleges that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during an alleged “class period” from April 22, 2004 to June 30, 2004 by failing to inform investors of certain operational issues that allegedly led to declines in our revenue, earnings and growth prospects. iPass and the individual defendants moved to dismiss the complaint. The motion was heard on January 23, 2006, and the motion was granted on February 27, 2006. The court granted plaintiffs leave to file an amended complaint, which shall be due by March 30, 2006. In addition, beginning on March 25, 2005, a stockholder purporting to act on our behalf filed a lawsuit entitled Narendar Gupta, et al. v. Kenneth Denman, et al., Case No. CIV445765 in the California Superior Court for the County of San Mateo against our directors and certain officers. iPass was also named as a nominal defendant solely in a derivative capacity. On April 6, 2005, a similar lawsuit entitled Eugene Danielson v. Kenneth D. Denman, et al., No. CIV446034 was filed in that same court. Both lawsuits were consolidated into a single action by stipulation and order dated April 26, 2005. The derivative action is based on the same factual allegations and circumstances as the purported securities class actions and alleges state law claims for insider trading, breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, waste of

corporate assets, and unjust enrichment and seeks monetary damages on behalf of iPass to be proven at trial. On May 5, 2005, the actions were consolidated as In re iPass, Inc. Derivative Litigation, Case No. CIV445765. Plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint on February 21, 2006, and the defendants have until March 28, 2006 within which to respond to the complaint. If our stock price declines substantially in the future, we may be the target of similar litigation. The current, and any future, securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources, and could seriously harm our business.

      Because we rely on third parties to help us develop, market and support our service offerings, from time to time we have been, and we may continue to be, involved in disputes with these third parties. If we are unable to resolve these disputes favorably, our development, marketing or support of our services could be delayed or limited, which could materially and adversely affect our business.

      We license technologies from several software providers that are incorporated in our services. We anticipate that we will continue to license technology from third parties in the future. In particular, we license encryption technology from RSA Security. Our license agreement with RSA Security expired in February 2006 and automatically renewed for an additional three-year period. This license will continue to automatically renew for additional three-year periods upon expiration, unless terminated by us or by RSA Security. Licenses from third party technologies, including our license with RSA Security, may not continue to be available to us at a reasonable cost, or at all. The loss of these technologies or other technologies that we license could have an adverse effect on our services and increase our costs or cause interruptions or delays in our services until substitute technologies, if available, are developed or identified, licensed and successfully integrated into our services.

      We cannot be certain that our products do not, or will not, infringe upon patents, trademarks, copyrights or other intellectual property rights held by third parties, or that other parties will not assert infringement claims against us. From time to time we have been, and we may continue to be, involved in disputes with these third parties. Any claim of infringement of proprietary rights of others, even if ultimately decided in our favor, could result in substantial costs and diversion of our resources. Successful claims against us may result in an injunction or substantial monetary liability, in either case which could significantly impact our results of operations or materially disrupt the conduct of our business. If we are enjoined from using a technology, we will need to obtain a license to use the technology, but licenses to third-party technology may not be available to us at a reasonable cost, or at all.

      On January 1, 2006, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Revised” (“SFAS 123R”), which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all stock-based compensation based on estimated fair values. As a result, our operating results for the first quarter of 2006 and for future periods will contain a charge for stock-based compensation related to employee stock options and employee stock purchases. The application of SFAS 123R requires the use of an option-pricing model to determine the fair value of share-based payment awards. This determination of fair value is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, our expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards, and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors. Option-pricing models were developed for use in estimating the value of traded options that have no vesting or hedging restrictions and are fully transferable. Because our employee stock options have certain characteristics that are significantly different from traded options, and because changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the estimated value, in management’s opinion the existing

valuation models may not provide an accurate measure of the fair value of our employee stock options. Although the fair value of employee stock options is determined in accordance with SFAS 123R and SAB 107 using an option-pricing model, that value may not be indicative of the fair value observed in a willing buyer/willing seller market transaction. We expect that our adoption of SFAS 123R will have a material impact on our financial statements and results of operations and this will continue to be the case for future periods. We cannot predict the effect that this adverse impact on our reported operating results will have on the trading price of our common stock.

Risks Relating to Our Industry

      The secure transmission of confidential information over public networks is a significant barrier to further adoption of the Internet as a business medium. The Internet is a public network and information is sent over this network from many sources. Advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of code breaking or other developments could result in compromised security on our network or the networks of others. Security and authentication concerns with respect to the transmission over the Internet of confidential information, such as corporate access passwords and the ability of hackers to penetrate online security systems may reduce the demand for our services. Further, new access methods, devices, applications and operating systems have also introduced additional vulnerabilities which have been actively exploited by hackers. Internet-based worms and viruses, computer programs that are created to slow Internet traffic or disrupt computer networks or files by replicating through software or operating systems, are examples of events or computer programs that can disrupt users from using our Internet-based services and reduce demand for our services, potentially affecting our business and financial performance. In particular, certain Internet worms and viruses affected some of our customers and their mobile users, which may have negatively impacted our revenues. Furthermore, any well-publicized compromises of confidential information may reduce demand for Internet-based communications, including our services.

      Our revenues and profitability depend on the overall demand for enterprise connectivity services. The general weakening of the global economy from early 2001 to 2003 led to decreased trade and corporate spending on Internet infrastructure. In addition, in the past, terrorist attacks, including the attacks on the United States and internationally, have had a significant impact on global economic conditions and our operations. If there are further acts of terrorism, if hostilities involving the United States and other countries continue or escalate, or if other future financial, political, economic and other uncertainties or natural disasters arise, this could lead to a reduction in travel, including by business travelers who are substantial users of our services, and continue to contribute to a climate of economic and political uncertainty that could adversely affect our revenue growth and financial results.

      Internet-based communication services generally are not subject to federal fees or taxes imposed to support programs such as universal telephone service. Changes in the rules or regulations of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission or in applicable federal communications laws relating to the imposition of these fees or taxes could result in significant new operating expenses for us, and could negatively impact our business. Any new law or regulation, U.S. or foreign, pertaining to Internet-based communications services, or changes to the application or interpretation of existing laws, could decrease the demand for our services, increase our cost of doing business or otherwise harm our business. There are an increasing number of laws and regulations pertaining to the Internet. These laws or regulations may relate to taxation and the quality of products and services. Furthermore, the applicability to the Internet of existing laws governing intellectual property ownership and infringement, taxation, encryption, obscenity, libel, employment, personal privacy, export or import matters and other issues is uncertain and developing and we are not certain how the possible application of these laws may affect us. Some of these laws may not contemplate or address the unique issues

of the Internet and related technologies. Changes in laws intended to address these issues could create uncertainty in the Internet market, which could reduce demand for our services, increase our operating expenses or increase our litigation costs.

      There are no unresolved written SEC comments received at least 180 days prior to December 31, 2005.

      We lease approximately 74,000 square feet of space in our headquarters in Redwood Shores, California under a lease that expires in 2010. We also lease sales and support offices in other parts of the Unites States and abroad. We believe that our principal facility in Redwood Shores will be adequate for our needs for at least the next several years, and we might expect that additional facilities will be available in other jurisdictions to the extent we add new offices.

      Beginning on January 14, 2005, three purported class action complaints were filed against us and certain of our executive officers in United States District Court for the Northern District of California. On March 2, 2005, these cases were consolidated as In re iPass Securities Litigation, Case No. 3:05-cv-00228-MHP. On April 22, 2005, David Lutzke and Rhonda Lutzke were named lead plaintiffs. On July 5, 2005, plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Amended Complaint. Named as defendants together with us are Kenneth D. Denman, Donald C. McCauley, Anurag Lal and Jon M. Russo. The Consolidated Amended Complaint alleges that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during an alleged “class period” from April 22, 2004 to June 30, 2004 by failing to inform investors of certain operational issues that allegedly led to declines in our revenue, earnings and growth prospects. iPass and the individual defendants moved to dismiss the complaint. The motion was heard on January 23, 2006, and the motion was granted on February 27, 2006. The court granted plaintiffs leave to file an amended complaint, which shall be due by March 30, 2006. The case is at an early stage and no trial date has been set. No discovery is expected to take place unless and until plaintiffs file a complaint that survives the individual defendants’ motion to dismiss. iPass and the individual defendants intend to take all appropriate actions to defend the suit. We cannot estimate any possible loss at this time.

      On March 25, 2005, a stockholder purporting to act on our behalf filed a lawsuit entitled Narendar Gupta, et al. v. Kenneth Denman, et al., Case No. CIV445765 in the California Superior Court for the County of San Mateo against our directors and certain officers. iPass was also named as a nominal defendant solely in a derivative capacity. On April 6, 2005, a similar lawsuit entitled Eugene Danielson v. Kenneth D. Denman, et al., No. CIV446034 was filed in that same court. Both lawsuits were consolidated into a single action by stipulation and order dated April 26, 2005. The derivative action is based on the same factual allegations and circumstances as the purported securities class actions and alleges state law claims for insider trading, breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, waste of corporate assets, and unjust enrichment and seeks monetary damages on behalf of iPass to be proven at trial. On May 5, 2005, the actions were consolidated as In re iPass, Inc. Derivative Litigation, Case No. CIV445765. Plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint on February 21, 2006, and the defendants have until March 28, 2006 within which to respond to the complaint. The case is at an early stage, no discovery has occurred and no trial date has been set. iPass and the individual defendants intend to take all appropriate actions to defend the suit. We cannot estimate any possible loss at this time.

      We may be subject to various other claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business from time to time.

      No matters were submitted to a vote of our stockholders during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2005.

PART II

Price Range of Common Stock

      Our common stock is traded on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “IPAS”. The following table sets forth the high and low sale price of our common stock, based on the last daily sale, in each quarterly period within the two most recent fiscal years, as reported on the Nasdaq National Market:

      We had 64,567,835 shares of our common stock outstanding held by 168 stockholders of record as of February 28, 2006.

Dividend Policy

      We have never paid any cash dividends on our common stock. Our board of directors currently intends to retain future earnings to support operations and to finance the growth and development of our business and does not intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Any future determination related to dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our board of directors.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

      Information regarding our equity compensation plans will be presented under the caption “Securities Authorized For Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans” in our definitive proxy statement in connection with our 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed not later than April 30, 2006 (the “Proxy Statement”). That information is incorporated into this report by reference.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

      We have not made any sales of unregistered securities following the date of our initial public offering.

      The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” following this section and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report. The historical results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected in any future period.

Company Overview

      We deliver simple, secure and manageable enterprise mobility services, maximizing the productivity of workers as they move between office, home and remote locations. Our policy management services close the gaps in protecting computers, network assets, user identities and data whenever users connect over the Internet. Our connectivity services utilize the iPass global virtual network, a unified network of hundreds of dial-up, wireless, and broadband providers in over 160 countries.

Overview of 2005

      In 2005, we continued to experience a decline in revenues derived from our traditional dial-up business as dial-up revenue decreased 8% to $138.1 million in 2005 as compared to 2004. This decrease was offset in part by revenues generated from fees and from usage of our broadband service. We also continued to add new customers during 2005, including 42 from the Forbes Global 2000, bringing our total customers to 291 as of December 31, 2005.

      As we continued to increase the number of broadband access points during the year, increasing our global broadband footprint was a priority for us in 2005. We ended 2005 with approximately 38,000 Wi-Fi and wired hotspots worldwide, approximately 36,000 of which were Wi-Fi hotspots and approximately 2,000 of which were wired hotspots. This enabled our customers to remotely access their corporate networks from more locations, at higher speeds and contributed to a $6.5 million increase in broadband usage revenue in 2005 over 2004.

      Going forward, we will continue to focus on delivering innovative services and solutions for our customers, increasing the number of end users of our services for both dial-up and broadband access, as well as continue to increase fee revenues from endpoint policy management and other fee based services. In 2006, we expect to see continued growth in our business. However, our success could be limited by several factors, including the timely release of new products, continued market acceptance of our products and the introduction of new products by existing or new competitors. For a further discussion of these and other risk factors, see the section below entitled “Factors Affecting Operating Results.”

Sources of Revenues

      We derive our revenues primarily from providing enterprise connectivity services through our virtual network. We sell these services directly, as well as indirectly through our channel partners. We bill substantially all customers on a time basis for usage based on negotiated rates. We bill the remaining customers based on a fixed charge per active user per month with additional charges for excess time. Substantially all enterprise customers commit to a one to three year contract term. Most of our contracts with enterprise customers contain minimum usage levels. We bill customers for minimum commitments when actual usage is less than their monthly minimum commitment amount. We recognize the difference between the minimum commitment and actual usage as fee revenue once the cash for such fee has been collected. Our usage-based revenues represented 87%, 92% and 93% of our revenues for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

      We have incurred expenses to expand our broadband coverage and are seeking to generate additional revenues from our broadband wired and wireless coverage. Revenues from usage of our broadband services were 5.2% and 1.4% of our total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

      We also provide customers with deployment services and technical support throughout the term of the contract. We typically charge fees for these services on a one-time or annual basis, depending on the service provided and the nature of the relationship. In addition, we also offer customers additional services for which we generally bill on a monthly basis. With the acquisition of Mobile Automation, Inc. in October of 2004, we also began generating license and maintenance revenue through software licensing agreements. Revenues generated from license and maintenance fees, together with revenues generated from fees, represented approximately 13% and 8% of our revenues for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

      Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, income taxes, and allowance for doubtful accounts. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis of making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities.

      We believe the following critical accounting policies and estimates are important in understanding our consolidated financial statements.

      We derive substantially all of our revenues from usage fees. We recognize revenues when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, service has been provided to the customer, the price to the customer is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured.

      Revenues are recognized during the period the services are rendered to end users based on usage at negotiated rates. We typically require our customers to commit to minimum usage levels. Minimum usage

levels can be based on an annual term, monthly term or over the term of the arrangement. If actual usage in a given period is less than the minimum commitment, we recognize the difference between the actual usage and the minimum commitment as revenue when cash is collected because we cannot reasonably estimate the amount of the difference that will be collected. We cannot reasonably estimate the amount of the difference to be collected because we have from time to time renegotiated minimum commitments in cases where customers have sought renegotiation of their contract for reasons such as a significant downturn in their business or where we have determined that it would be in our best interest to do so. Customers are not contractually entitled to use or otherwise receive benefit for unused service in subsequent periods.

      We typically provide our customers with deployment services, technical support and additional optional services. Depending on the service provided and the nature of the arrangement, we may charge a one-time, annual or monthly fee. Revenues relating to one-time fees are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the initial contract, generally one to three years as we can not reasonably estimate the period of performance. Revenues relating to annual fees are recognized on a straight-line basis. Revenues for monthly services are recognized during the month that these services are provided.

      License revenue consists of revenue earned under software license agreements. License revenue is generally recognized when a signed contract or other persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the software has been shipped or electronically delivered, the license fee is fixed or determinable, and collection of the resulting receivable is probable as prescribed by AICPA Statement of Portion (“SOP”) 97-2. We enter into revenue arrangements in which a customer may purchase a combination of software, upgrades and maintenance and support (multiple-element arrangements). When vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value exists for all elements, we allocate revenue to each element based on the relative fair value of each of the elements. VSOE of fair value is established by the price charged when that element is sold separately. When contracts contain multiple elements wherein VSOE of fair value exists for all undelivered elements, we account for the delivered elements in accordance with the “residual method” prescribed by AICPA Statement of Position (“SOP”) 98-9. Revenue from subscription license agreements, which include software, rights to future products on a when-and-if available basis and maintenance, is recognized ratably over the term of the subscription period. Revenue on shipments to resellers, which is generally subject to certain rights of return and price protection, is recognized when the products are sold by the resellers to the end-user customer.

      Maintenance revenue consists of fees for providing software updates on a when and if available basis and technical support for software products (post-contract support or “PCS”). Maintenance revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the agreement.

      Payments received in advance of services performed are deferred. Allowances for estimated future returns and discounts are provided for upon recognition of revenue.

      The Company generally performs credit reviews to evaluate the customers’ ability to pay. If the Company determines that collectibility is not probable, revenue is recognized as cash is collected.

      In preparing our consolidated financial statements, we assess the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be realized from future taxable income. We establish a valuation allowance if we determine that it is more likely than not that some portion of the net deferred tax assets will not be realized. Changes in the valuation allowance are included in our consolidated statements of income as a provision for (benefit from) income taxes. We exercise significant judgment in determining our provisions for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and our future taxable income for purposes of assessing our ability to utilize any future tax benefit from our deferred tax assets.

      When we assess the likelihood that we will be able to recover our deferred tax assets, we consider all available evidence, both positive and negative, including historical levels of income, expectations and risks associated with estimates of future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in

assessing the need for a valuation allowance. If recovery is not likely, we would increase our provision for taxes by recording a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets that we estimate will not ultimately be recoverable. The available positive evidence at December 31, 2005 included three years of historical operating profits and a projection of future income limited to three years which coincides with the period over which we recorded historical operating profits. We continue to closely monitor available evidence and may adjust our valuation allowance in future periods.

      Although we believe it is more likely than not that we will realize our net deferred tax assets, there is no guarantee this will be the case as our ability to use the net operating losses is contingent upon our ability to generate sufficient taxable income in the carryforward period. At each period end, we reassess our ability to realize our net operating losses. If we conclude it is more likely than not that we would not realize the benefit of our net operating losses, we may have to re-establish all or a portion of the valuation allowance and therefore record a significant charge to our results of operations.

      Our allowance for doubtful accounts is based on a detailed assessment of accounts receivable for specific, as well as anticipated, uncollectible accounts receivable. Our estimate for the allowance for doubtful accounts is based on credit profiles of our customers, current economic trends, contractual terms and conditions, and historical payment experience. We have an allowance for doubtful accounts of $2.0 million, $2.1 million and $2.3 million as of December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make their required payments. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, or if we underestimated the allowances required, additional allowances may be required, which would result in an increased general and administrative expense in the period such determination was made.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Revenue

      Total revenue increased slightly in 2005 as compared to 2004 due to offsetting factors. Revenues generated from dial up usage decreased from $150.5 million in 2004 to $138.1 million in 2005. This represents a decrease of $12.4 million or 9%. This was offset in part by increases in revenues generated from broadband usage and fees. Revenues generated from usage of our broadband services were $8.8 million and $2.3 million dollars for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Fee revenue increased from $13.6 million in 2004 to $22.5 million in 2005. We expect revenue from dial up usage to continue to decrease in absolute dollars as well as a percentage of total revenue, but we can not reasonably estimate if the decline will be consistent with that seen from 2004 to 2005. No individual customer accounted for 10% or more of total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 or 2003. Revenues from fees represented approximately 13%, 8% and 7% of our total revenue in 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively.

      The growth in total revenue in 2004 over 2003 was due primarily to an increase in the usage of our services resulting from an increased number of end users of our services at new and existing customers. Distinct end users of our service increased to 518,000 in the month of December of 2004, compared to 447,000 for the same period in 2003.

      International revenues, which are revenues generated from customers domiciled outside the United States, accounted for approximately 45%, 41% and 39% of total revenues in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Substantially all of our international revenues are generated in the EMEA (Europe, Middle East

and Africa) and Asia Pacific regions. Revenues in the EMEA region represented 29%, 24% and 21% of total revenues in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase in EMEA as a percent of revenues has been driven by the expansion of our sales force in the region. Revenues in the Asia Pacific region represented 12%, 13% and 14% of total revenues in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Revenues in the United Kingdom accounted for 14% and 11% of total revenues in 2005 and 2004, respectively. No individual foreign country accounted for 10% or more of total revenues in 2003. To date, substantially all of our revenues have been denominated in U.S. dollars, although in the future some portion of revenues may be denominated in foreign currencies.

Operating Expenses

      Network access expenses consist of charges for access, principally by the minute, that we pay to our network service providers.

      The growth in network access expenses in 2005 over 2004 was due primarily to increased usage of our virtual network with respect to our broadband services. For our dial-up access costs, we continued to purchase network access from additional service providers at a lower cost and to renegotiate a number of our existing network service provider contracts in 2005. While network access costs for broadband access are higher than those for dial-up, we believe that going forward, we will have the ability to negotiate lower rates for access to broadband networks. We expect network access expenses to continue to increase in absolute dollars and increase as a percentage of revenues as usage of our virtual network increases.

      The growth in network access expenses in 2004 over 2003 was due primarily to increased usage of our virtual network. In 2004, we continued to purchase network access from additional service providers at a lower cost and to renegotiate a number of our network service provider contracts, resulting in lower network access costs for dial-up. This was offset in part by an increase in network access expenses for broadband usage.

      Network operations expenses consist of compensation and benefits for our network engineering, customer support, network access quality and information technology personnel, outside consultants, transaction center fees, depreciation of our network equipment, and certain allocated overhead costs.

      The increase in network operations expenses from 2004 to 2005 in absolute dollars was due primarily to $1.1 million in additional compensation and benefits expense due to an increase in personnel, $497,000 additional depreciation expense on network operations equipment in support and expansion of our virtual network and $404,000 of additional transaction center fees and communication lines expenses. This was offset in part by a $443,000 decrease in fees paid to consultants. To the extent that we continue to expand our operations, we expect that our network operations expenses will increase in absolute dollars, and increase slightly as a percentage of total revenue.

      The increase in network operations expenses in 2004 over 2003 in absolute dollars was due primarily to $1.8 million in additional compensation and benefits expense due to an increase in personnel, $840,000 of additional transaction center fees, and $680,000 of additional depreciation expense on network operations equipment in support and expansion of our virtual network. There was also an additional $530,000 in license and maintenance fees as well as $250,000 in additional consulting fees. The remaining portion of the increase was due to individually insignificant items. Network operations expenses increased slightly as a percentage of total revenue as we continued to increase both the capacity and redundancy of our virtual network.

      Research and development expenses consist of compensation and benefits for our research and development personnel, consulting, and certain allocated overhead costs.

      The increase in research and development expenses from 2004 to 2005 was due primarily to an additional $2.6 million of compensation and benefits expenses related to an increase in headcount, $160,000 in fees paid to consultants to further develop our service and $171,000 in technology association fees. The increase as a percentage of revenues was due to the continued acceleration of our development of new products, the integration of technology acquired into existing products and services as a result of our two acquisitions of Safe3w and Mobile Automation in third and fourth quarters of 2004, respectively, as well as the increase in research and development personnel as a result of those acquisitions. We expect that our research and development expenses will continue to increase slightly in absolute dollars as we develop and enhance new and existing service offerings, but to remain relatively constant as a percentage of revenues.

      The increase in research and development expenses in 2004 over 2003 was due primarily to an additional $2.3 million of compensation and benefits expenses related to an increase in headcount, and approximately $1.2 million in fees paid to consultants to further develop our service. The increase as a percentage of revenues was due to the acceleration of our development of new products as well as the increase in research and development personnel as a result of the two acquisitions that occurred in 2004.

      Sales and marketing expenses consist of compensation, benefits, advertising, promotion expenses, and certain allocated overhead costs.

      The increase in sales and marketing expenses in 2005 over 2004 in absolute dollars was due primarily to an additional $2.6 million in compensation and benefits expenses due to the additional sales personnel from the Mobile Automation acquisition as well as the expansion of the sales organization in the EMEA region. There was also an increase of $406,000 in marketing programs, including trade shows and promotions. The increase also included $977,000 in compensation and benefits expenses for existing marketing personnel. The remaining portion of the increase was due to individually insignificant items. We expect that sales and

marketing expenses will increase in absolute dollars to the extent revenues increase and/or we expand our sales force and increase marketing activities, but will remain relatively constant as a percentage of revenues.

      The increase in sales and marketing expenses in 2004 over 2003 in absolute dollars was due primarily to an additional $2.3 million in compensation and benefits expenses resulting from the expansion of the sales organization in the EMEA and Asia Pacific regions, as well as the additional sales personnel from the acquisition of Mobile Automation in the fourth quarter of 2004. The increase also included $1.2 million of additional advertising and public relations expenses, as well as a $410,000 increase in compensation and benefits expenses for additional marketing personnel. The remaining portion of the increase was due to individually insignificant items.

      General and administrative expenses consist of compensation and benefits of general and administrative personnel, legal and accounting expenses, bad debt expense, and certain allocated overhead costs.

      General and administrative expenses decreased slightly in absolute dollars and remained relatively constant as a percentage of revenues from 2004 to 2005. Part of the increase in general and administrative expenses in 2005 was $275,000 in compensation and benefits expenses offset in part by a $937,000 decrease in bad debt expense. The remaining portion of the change from 2004 to 2005 was due to a net decrease of various individually insignificant accounts. We expect that our general and administrative expenses will increase in absolute dollars to the extent that we expand our operations, but to remain relatively constant as a percentage of revenues.

      A significant part of the increase in general and administrative expenses in 2004 over 2003 was $1.7 million in compensation and benefits expenses for additional personnel and $1.0 million for directors and officers insurance premiums. There was also a $1.0 million increase in legal and accounting fees. These increases were offset in part by decreases in various individually insignificant accounts.

      We record stock-based compensation charges in the amount by which the option exercise price or the restricted stock purchase price is less than the fair value of our common stock at the date of grant. We amortize this compensation expense on an accelerated basis over the vesting period of the applicable agreements, generally four years. Amortization of stock-based compensation expense relates to stock options granted to employees prior to our initial public offering in July of 2003.

      We expect to incur amortization of stock-based compensation expense of at least $498,000 in 2006 and $95,000 in 2007 and thereafter. The amount of amortization of stock-based compensation expense to be recognized in future periods could decrease if stock options for which accrued but unvested compensation

expense has been recorded are forfeited. Amortization of stock-based compensation may change upon the adaptation of SFAS No. 123R in 2006.

      Amortization of acquired intangibles was $2.4 million and $457,000 for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The increase from 2004 to 2005 was due to the intangible assets being amortized over the entire year in 2005 as they were acquired during 2004.

Non-Operating Expenses

      Other income net, consists of the net total of interest income and interest expense for the period.

      Interest income includes interest income on cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investment balances. Interest income and other was $3.9 million, $2.3 million and $1.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase in interest and other income in 2005 was due to an increase in the average cash, cash equivalents and short-term investment balances for the period and an increase in the rate of return on our investments as compared to the same period in 2004.

      Interest expense consists of interest paid on our line of credit and loans, as well as amortization of a loan discount associated with the fair value of warrants issued in connection with our financing activities prior to 2004. Interest expense was $620,000 in 2003. There was no interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2004 and 2005. The decrease in interest expense is due to the paying off of our line of credit and all outstanding loans payable in July and August 2003.

      The provision for income taxes was $8.9 million in 2005, compared to a provision of $12.2 million in 2004. The decrease is due to a decrease in income before income taxes from $31.3 million in 2004 to $21.8 million in 2005. The increase in the provision for income taxes from $9.0 million in 2003 was due to an increase in income before income taxes in 2004 over 2003. The effective tax rate was 41% for the year ended December 31, 2005 and 39% for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. The increase in the 2005 effective tax rate was due to the recording of book to tax return true-ups in the fourth quarter of 2005.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

      From our inception in July 1996 through our initial public offering of our common stock in July 2003, we funded our operations primarily through issuances of preferred stock, which provided us with aggregate net proceeds of approximately $86.5 million. In July 2003, we completed the sale of 8,050,000 shares of common stock in an initial public offering, which includes the underwriters’ exercise of an over-allotment option, and realized net proceeds of $102.7 million. We used $10.9 million of the net proceeds to pay off all outstanding balances on loans payable and line of credit.

      Net cash provided by operating activities was $32.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, compared to $37.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 and $23.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities in 2005 is due primarily to our total revenues increasing by approximately $3.1 million, while operating expenses increased by $14.1 million as compared to 2004.

      Net cash used in investing activities in 2005 was $32.5 million in 2005 compared to $59.9 million in 2004 and $99.2 million in 2003, respectively. Net cash used in investing activities in 2005 was from the purchases of $170.4 million in short-term investments, offset by the maturities of short-term investments in the amount of $141.8 million as well as $3.9 million for the purchases of property and equipment. Net cash used in investing activities in 2004 was from the purchases of $156.3 million in short-term investments, offset by the maturities of short-term investments in the amount of $131.1 million. Net cash used in investing activities also included

$28.4 million for the acquisition of Safe3w and Mobile Automation as well as $6.2 million for the purchases of property and equipment.

      Net cash provided by financing activities in 2005 was $3.8 million, compared to $10.9 million and $93.2 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively. Cash provided by financing activities in 2005 was from proceeds from the issuance of common stock for employee stock options and through the employee stock purchase program. Cash provided by financing activities in 2004 was the result of proceeds from the issuance of common stock for employee stock options plus the receipt of payment of shareholder notes receivable. In comparison, cash provided by financing activities in 2003 was primarily due to net proceeds from our initial public offering, offset in part by the payment of all outstanding balances on our line of credit and loans payable.

      We anticipate that our operating expenses, as well as planned capital expenditures, will constitute a material use of our cash resources for the foreseeable future in order to execute our business plan. In addition, we may utilize cash resources to fund acquisitions of complementary businesses, technologies or product lines. We believe that our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments on hand will be sufficient to meet our cash requirements for at least the next 18 months, including working capital requirements and planned capital expenditures.

      As of December 31, 2005, our principal source of liquidity was $184.6 million of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments.

      At December 31, 2004 and 2005, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements or relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which are typically established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.

      At December 31, 2005, we had no material commitments for capital expenditures.

      We have signed contracts with some network service providers under which we have minimum purchase commitments that expire on various dates through December 2007. Other than in the approximately 24 countries in which our sole dial-up network service provider is Equant, we have contracted with multiple network service providers to provide alternative access points in a given geographic area. In those geographic areas where we provide access through multiple providers, we are able to direct users to the network of particular service providers.

      Consequently, we believe we have the ability to fulfill our minimum purchase commitments in these geographic areas. In May 2005, we consolidated several term license agreements that were set to expire into a single, long-term operating lease with a vendor. Future minimum purchase commitments and operating lease payments under these agreements as of December 31, 2005 are as follows (in thousands):

      We lease our facilities under non-cancelable operating leases that expire at various dates through February 2010. Future minimum lease payments under these operating leases as of December 31, 2005 are as follows (in thousands):

Foreign Currency

      Although we currently bill our services in U.S. dollars, our financial results could be affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency rates or weak economic conditions in foreign markets. A strengthening of the dollar could make our services less competitive in foreign markets and therefore could reduce our revenues. We are billed by and pay substantially all of our network service providers in U.S. dollars. In the future, some portion of our revenues and costs may be denominated in foreign currencies. To date, exchange rate fluctuations have had little impact on our operating results.

Interest Rate Sensitivity

      As of December 31, 2005, we had cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments totaling $184.6 million. Our investment portfolio consists of auction rate and money market securities, asset backed securities, corporate securities, and government securities, generally due within one to two years. All of our instruments are classified as available for sale. We place investments with high quality issuers and limit the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer. These securities are subject to interest rate risks. Based on our portfolio content and our ability to hold investments to maturity, we believe that, a hypothetical 10% increase or decrease in current interest rates would not materially affect our interest income, although there can be no assurance of this.

      As of December 31, 2004, we had cash and cash equivalents of $152.3 million, which consisted of cash and highly liquid short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase, which we held solely for non-trading purposes. A hypothetical increase or decrease in market interest rates by 10% from the market interest rates would have caused the interest generated by, and the fair value of, these short-term investments to change by an immaterial amount.

      The following is a chart of the principal amounts of short-term investments by expected maturity (in thousands):

      Our general policy is to limit the risk of principal loss and ensure the safety of invested funds by limiting market and credit risk. We consider all investments to be short-term investments, which are classified in the balance sheet as current assets, because (1) the investments can be readily converted at any time into cash or into securities with a shorter remaining time to maturity and (2) the investments are selected for yield management purposes only and we are not committed to holding the investments until maturity. We determine the appropriate classification of our investments at the time of purchase and re-evaluate such designations as of each balance sheet date. All short-term investments and cash equivalents in our portfolio are classified as “available-for-sale” and are stated at fair market value, with the unrealized gains and losses reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method.

Financial Statements

      Our financial statements required by this item are set forth as a separate section of this report. See Item 15(a)(1) for a listing of financial statements provided in the section titled “Financial Statements.”

Supplementary Data

      The following tables set forth unaudited quarterly supplementary data for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2005 (in thousands, except per share amounts):

      None.

Controls and Procedures

      We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in our periodic SEC reports are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the in the SEC’s rules and the SEC reports.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

      In addition, there have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2005 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

      Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within iPass have been detected.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

      Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Our management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2005, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on these criteria. Our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, have issued an audit report on our assessment of our internal control over financial reporting, which is included herein.

      None.

PART III

      Information relating to our executive officers and directors will be presented under the captions “Proposal 1 — Election of Directors” and “Executive Officers and Directors” in our definitive proxy statement in connection with our 2006 Annual Meeting of stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than April 30, 2006 (the “Proxy Statement”). That information is incorporated into this report by reference.

      Information concerning compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 will be presented under the caption “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Proxy Statement. That information is incorporated into this report by reference.

Code of Ethics

      We have adopted a code of conduct and ethics that applies to all of our employees, including the principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. This code of conduct and ethics is posted on our website. The Internet address for our website is http://www.ipass.com, and the code of conduct and ethics may be found as follows:

      1. From our main Web page, first click on “Investors.”

      2. Next, click on “Corporate Governance.”

      3. Then, click on “Code of Conduct.”

      4. Finally, click on “Code of Conduct and Ethics.”

      We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or waiver from, a provision of this code of conduct and ethics by posting such information on our website, at the address and location specified above.

      Information relating to director and executive compensation required by this Item 11 will be presented under the captions “Compensation of Directors,” “Compensation of Executive Officers,” and “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” in the Proxy Statement. That information is incorporated into this report by reference.

      Information relating to the security ownership of our common stock by our management and other beneficial owners will be presented under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in the Proxy Statement. That information is incorporated into this report by reference.

      Information relating to securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be presented under the caption “Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans” in the Proxy Statement. That information is incorporated into this report by reference.

      Information relating to certain relationships of our directors and executive officers and related transactions will be presented under the caption “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” in the Proxy Statement. That information is incorporated into this report by reference.

      The information required by this item will be included under the captions “Proposal No. 2 — Ratification of Independent Auditors — Principal Accountant Fees and Services” in the Proxy Statement. That information is incorporated into this report by reference.

PART IV

      (a) The following financial statements are filed as part of this report:

      None. All schedules are omitted because they are not required or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

iPass Inc.:

      We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of iPass Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

      We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

      In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of iPass Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

      We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of iPass Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated March 15, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment of, and the effective operation of, internal control over financial reporting.

Mountain View, California

March 15, 2006

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

iPass Inc.:

      We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that iPass Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Management of iPass is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

      We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

      A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

      Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

      In our opinion, management’s assessment that iPass maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by COSO. Also, in our opinion, iPass maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by COSO.

      We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of iPass Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, and our report dated March 15, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

Mountain View, California

March 15, 2006

iPASS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

iPASS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

iPASS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(In thousands)