INTERCONTINENTALEXCHANGE,INC.
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission File Number
001-32671
INTERCONTINENTALEXCHANGE,
INC.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
58-2555670
(IRS Employer
Identification Number)
|
|
|
|
2100 RiverEdge Parkway,
Suite 500, Atlanta,
Georgia
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
30328
(Zip
Code)
|
(770) 857-4700
Registrants telephone number, including area
code
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Exchange Act of
1934. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Act during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of the registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the registrants voting and
non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by
reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold
as of the last business day of the registrants most
recently completed second fiscal quarter was $7,774,777,086. As
of February 9, 2009, the number of shares of the
registrants Common Stock outstanding was
72,649,190 shares.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Certain information contained in the registrants Proxy
Statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is
incorporated herein by reference in Part III of this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K.
The Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of the
registrants fiscal year to which this report relates.
INTERCONTINENTALEXCHANGE,
INC.
ANNUAL REPORT ON
FORM 10-K
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2008
TABLE OF CONTENTS
i
PART I
In this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
unless otherwise specified or the context otherwise requires:
|
|
|
|
|
IntercontinentalExchange, ICE,
we, us, our, our
company and our business refer to
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
|
|
|
|
ICE Futures Europe refers to our wholly-owned
subsidiary, which, prior to September 3, 2007, operated as
ICE Futures and which, prior to October 25, 2005, operated
as the International Petroleum Exchange of London, Ltd., or the
IPE.
|
|
|
|
ICE Futures U.S. refers to our wholly-owned
subsidiary that we acquired on January 12, 2007, which,
prior to our acquisition, operated as the Board of Trade of the
City of New York, Inc., or NYBOT, a member-owned
not-for-profit
corporation, and, after our acquisition, operated as the Board
of Trade of the City of New York, Inc., a wholly-owned
subsidiary of IntercontinentalExchange. On September 3,
2007, we renamed NYBOT ICE Futures U.S. ICE
Clear U.S. refers to ICE Futures U.S.s wholly-owned
clearing subsidiary, which previously operated as the New York
Clearing Corporation, or NYCC.
|
|
|
|
ICE Futures Canada refers to our wholly-owned
subsidiary that we acquired on August 27, 2007 and which
previously operated as the Winnipeg Commodity Exchange, Inc, or
the WCE. ICE Clear Canada refers to ICE Futures
Canadas wholly-owned clearing subsidiary, which previously
operated as WCE Clearing Corporation, or WCECC.
|
Due to rounding, figures in tables may not sum exactly.
Forward-Looking
Statements
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
including the sections entitled Business,
Legal Proceedings and Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, contains forward-looking statements that are
based on our present beliefs and assumptions and on information
currently available to us. You can identify forward-looking
statements by terminology such as may,
will, should, could,
would, targets, goal,
expect, intend, plan,
anticipate, believe,
estimate, predict,
potential, continue, or the negative of
these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements
relate to future events or our future financial performance and
involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors
that may cause our actual results, levels of activity,
performance or achievements to differ materially from those
expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These
risks and other factors include those set forth in
Item 1(A) under the caption Risk Factors and
elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
or SEC. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in
the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot
guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or
achievements. We caution you not to place undue reliance on
these forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements and
other factors that may affect our performance include, but are
not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
our expectations regarding the business environment in which we
operate and trends in our industry, including increasing
competition, consolidation and trading volumes;
|
|
|
|
conditions in global financial markets;
|
|
|
|
our ability to identify and effectively pursue acquisitions and
strategic alliances and successfully integrate the companies we
acquire;
|
|
|
|
our ability to minimize the risks associated with operating
multiple clearing houses in multiple jurisdictions;
|
|
|
|
the impact of any changes in domestic and foreign regulations or
government policy, including any changes or reviews of
previously issued regulations and policies;
|
|
|
|
our initiative to establish a credit derivatives clearing house
to clear credit default swaps;
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to keep pace with rapid technological developments
and to ensure that the technology we utilize is not vulnerable
to security risks;
|
|
|
|
the accuracy of our cost estimates and expectations;
|
|
|
|
our belief that cash flows will be sufficient to service our
debt and fund our working capital needs and capital
expenditures, at least through the end of 2010;
|
|
|
|
our ability, on a timely and cost-effective basis, to offer
additional products and services, leverage our risk management
capabilities and enhance our technology;
|
|
|
|
our ability to maintain existing market participants and attract
new ones;
|
|
|
|
our ability to protect our intellectual property rights,
including the costs associated with such protection, and our
ability to operate our business without violating the
intellectual property rights of others;
|
|
|
|
potential adverse litigation results; and
|
|
|
|
our belief in the soundness of our electronic platform and
disaster recovery system technologies, as well as our ability to
gain access on a timely and cost-effective basis to comparable
products and services if our key technology contracts were
terminated.
|
Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on
which such statement is made, and we undertake no obligation to
update any forward-looking statement or statements to reflect
events or circumstances after the date on which such statement
is made or to reflect the occurrence of an unanticipated event.
New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for
management to predict all factors that may affect our business
and prospects. Further, management cannot assess the impact of
each factor on the business or the extent to which any factor,
or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ
materially from those contained in any forward-looking
statements.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements and related notes included
elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
General
We are a leading regulated global futures exchange and
over-the-counter,
or OTC, market operator. We operate the leading electronic
futures and OTC marketplace for trading a broad array of energy,
soft agricultural and agricultural commodities, credit default
swaps, or CDS, and financial products. Currently, we are the
only marketplace to offer an integrated electronic platform for
side-by-side
trading of products in both futures and OTC markets, together
with clearing services. Through our widely-distributed
electronic marketplace, we bring together buyers and sellers of
derivative and physical commodities and financial contracts and
offer a range of services to support our participants risk
management needs.
We conduct our regulated energy futures markets through our
wholly-owned subsidiary, ICE Futures Europe, which is based in
the United Kingdom, or U.K. ICE Futures Europe is the largest
energy futures exchange outside of the United States, or U.S.,
as measured by 2008 traded contract volume, and one of the top
10 commodity exchanges in the world, according to the Futures
Industry Association. We conduct our regulated U.S. futures
markets through our wholly-owned subsidiary, ICE Futures
U.S. We conduct our regulated Canadian futures markets
through our wholly-owned subsidiary, ICE Futures Canada. ICE
Futures Europe clears its business through ICE Clear Europe, ICE
Futures U.S. clears its business through ICE Clear
U.S. and ICE Futures Canada clears its business through ICE
Clear Canada. We completed our acquisition of ICE Futures
U.S. in January 2007 and our acquisition of ICE Futures
Canada in August 2007. The launch of ICE Clear Europe occurred
in November 2008, completing our strategic plan to offer
clearing services through wholly-owned clearing businesses in
the United States, the United Kingdom and Canada. Clearing
services for our U.K. energy futures and cleared global OTC
energy businesses were previously outsourced to a third party
U.K. clearing house.
2
We conduct our OTC business directly through
IntercontinentalExchange as an Exempt Commercial Market under
the Commodity Exchange Act and through Creditex Group Inc., or
Creditex, an interdealer broker. We completed our acquisition of
Creditex in August 2008. Creditex is a market leader and
innovator in the execution and processing of index and
single-name CDS with markets spanning the United States, Europe
and Asia. In October 2008 we announced our planned acquisition
of The Clearing Corporation as part of our strategy to offer
clearing in the CDS market.
Our
Business
We operate diverse global markets that promote price
transparency and offer participants the opportunity to trade a
variety of energy, soft agricultural and agricultural
commodities, CDS and financial products. Our core products
include contracts based on crude and refined oil products,
natural gas, power, coal, emissions, sugar, cotton, coffee,
cocoa, canola, orange juice, CDS, foreign exchange and equity
index products. Our derivative and physical products provide
participants with a means for managing risks associated with
changes in the prices of these commodities, asset allocation,
ensuring physical delivery of select commodity products and
trading. The majority of our trading volume is financially or
cash settled, meaning that settlement is made through cash
payments based on the difference between the purchase price of
the contract and the value of the underlying commodity at
contract expiration, rather than through physical delivery of
the commodity itself.
All futures and options contracts and many of our OTC swap
contracts are cleared through a central counterparty clearing
house. We also offer OTC swap contracts that can be traded on a
bilateral basis. Our customer base includes professional
traders, financial institutions, institutional and individual
investors, corporations, manufacturers, commodity producers and
refiners, and governmental bodies. We do not take proprietary
trading positions in any contracts in our markets.
We operate our U.S., U.K. and Canadian exchanges, as well as our
OTC markets, primarily on our electronic platform, except for
the Creditex business, in which trading is conducted both
electronically on Creditexs proprietary platform, and
through voice brokered transactions. ICE Futures
U.S. continues to offer options on futures markets through
its open-outcry trading floor based in New York City,
complementing our electronic futures and options offerings. In
addition to trade execution, our electronic platform offers a
comprehensive suite of trading-related services, including pre-
and post-trade risk management tools, electronic trade
confirmation and clearing services. Through our platform, we
facilitate straight-through processing of trades, with the goal
of providing seamless integration of front-, back- and
mid-office trading and risk management activities.
We operate and manage our business on the basis of three
segments: our futures business segment, our OTC business segment
and our market data business segment. For a discussion of these
segments and related financial disclosure, refer to note 18
to our consolidated financial statements and related notes
included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
History
In May 2000, IntercontinentalExchange was established, with our
founding shareholders representing some of the worlds
largest energy companies and global banks. Our mission was to
transform OTC energy markets by providing an open, accessible,
around-the-clock
electronic energy marketplace to a previously fragmented and
opaque market. We offered the energy community greater price
transparency, efficiency, liquidity and lower costs than manual
trading, such as voice or floor markets. Working together with
participants in the energy markets, we developed the leading
electronic marketplace for energy commodities, along with the
leading electronic trade confirmation platform.
In June 2001, we expanded our business into the futures markets
by acquiring the IPE, now ICE Futures Europe. Europes
leading regulated energy futures exchange, ICE Futures
Europes markets today account for approximately 50% of the
worlds crude oil and refined futures traded each day. In
April 2005, ICE Futures Europe became the first fully electronic
energy exchange.
3
ICE Data was launched in 2002 to meet the demand for increased
market data in the OTC energy markets, and is today one of the
leading providers of futures and OTC data globally. Since 2003,
we have partnered with the Chicago Climate Exchange, or CCX, to
host its OTC emissions markets, and today we offer the leading
European emissions futures contracts in conjunction with the
European Climate Exchange, or ECX.
In November 2005, we completed our initial public offering on
the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol
ICE and have since become a member of the Russell
1000 and the S&P 500 indexes. In January 2007, we acquired
NYBOT, now known as ICE Futures U.S. Today, ICE Futures
U.S.s futures contracts for soft agricultural commodities
such as sugar and coffee are listed in our electronic markets.
In June 2007, we entered into an exclusive licensing agreement
with the Frank Russell Company to list the U.S. Russell
Index futures complex. Also in 2007, we acquired the exclusive
right to key natural gas indexes, including the NGI and NGX
indexes.
In July 2007, we acquired and integrated ChemConnects OTC
natural gas liquids and chemicals markets. In August 2007, we
acquired the Winnipeg Commodity Exchange, the leading canola
market in the world, now known as ICE Futures Canada. In October
2007, we acquired Chatham Energy, or Chatham, a leading OTC
energy options broker, and in February 2008, we acquired
YellowJacket Software, Inc., or YellowJacket, a leading
peer-to-peer
negotiation platform for the OTC options markets.
In August 2008, we completed our acquisition of Creditex, a
leading interdealer market for the execution and processing of
credit derivatives. In October 2008, we announced plans to
acquire The Clearing Corporation, or TCC, and the transaction is
expected to close in the first quarter of 2009. TCC will be the
clearing service provider for our CDS clearing house, known as
ICE US Trust, or ICE Trust. ICE Trust is a limited purpose New
York trust regulated by the New York State Banking Department.
ICE Trust plans to commence clearing in the first quarter of
2009. Today, we employ over 790 professionals across the
United States, Europe and Asia.
Futures
Marketplaces
In our futures business, we operate three regulated futures
exchanges in the United States, the United Kingdom and
Canada. ICE Futures Europe operates as a Recognized Investment
Exchange in the United Kingdom, where it is regulated by
the U.K. Financial Services Authority, or FSA. ICE Futures
Europe was founded in 1980 as a traditional open-outcry auction
market, and today operates exclusively as an electronic
exchange. Trades in our energy futures markets may only be
executed in the name of exchange members for the members
own account or their customers account. Our members and
their customers include many of the worlds largest energy
companies and leading financial institutions.
ICE Futures U.S. is a leading global futures and options
exchange for trading in a broad array of soft agricultural
commodities, including sugar, coffee, cotton, cocoa and frozen
concentrated orange juice, or FCOJ. ICE Futures U.S. also
provides trading in futures and options contracts for a variety
of financial products, including its futures and options
contracts based on the Russell indexes and the U.S. Dollar
Index, or USDX. ICE Futures U.S. operates as a Designated
Contract Market and is regulated by the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission, or CFTC. Until February 2, 2007, ICE
Futures U.S. operated exclusively as an open-outcry
exchange and provided only floor-based markets. On that date,
ICE Futures U.S. listed its core soft agricultural
commodity markets on our electronic platform, and has
subsequently introduced the Russell indexes, currency pairs and
USDX futures and options contracts electronically. Options
markets continue to be available for trading on the floor of the
exchange.
ICE Futures Canada is Canadas leading commodity futures
and options exchange and North Americas first fully
electronic commodity futures exchange. Based in Winnipeg,
Manitoba, ICE Futures Canada offers futures and options
contracts on canola and western barley. For over a century ICE
Futures Canada, and its predecessor companies, have operated
futures markets that bring together agricultural industry
participants, traders, and investors to engage in price
discovery, price risk transfer and price dissemination for the
markets. ICE Futures Canada is a recognized commodity futures
exchange under the provisions of The Commodity Futures Act
(Manitoba), or the CFA, and is regulated by the Manitoba
Securities Commission, or MSC.
4
ICE Clear Europe clears and settles contracts for ICE Futures
Europe and is regulated by the FSA as a Recognized Clearing
House. ICE Futures U.S. owns its clearing house, ICE Clear
U.S., which clears and settles contracts traded on, or subject
to the rules of, ICE Futures U.S. ICE Clear U.S. is a
Derivatives Clearing Organization and is regulated by the CFTC.
ICE Futures Canada owns it clearing house, ICE Clear Canada,
which clears and settles contracts traded on, or subject to the
rules of, ICE Futures Canada. ICE Clear Canada is a recognized
clearing house under the provisions of the CFA and is regulated
by the MSC.
OTC
Marketplace
In our OTC business, we operate global
over-the-counter
markets primarily through our electronic platform. We offer
trading in thousands of contracts, covering a broad range of
energy-related products and contract types. These contracts
include derivative contracts as well as contracts that provide
for physical delivery of the underlying commodity, principally
relating to natural gas, power, natural gas liquids, chemicals
and crude and refined oil products. We offer a wide range of
derivative contracts in our OTC markets due to the availability
of various combinations of commodities, product types, delivery
hub locations and terms or settlement dates for a
given contract. In 2008 and 2007, we acquired Creditex,
YellowJacket, ChemConnect and Chatham, and as a result, have
expanded our markets to include CDS, natural gas liquids,
chemicals and natural gas options contracts. Our OTC market
participants include many of the worlds largest energy
companies, leading financial institutions and proprietary
trading firms, as well as natural gas distribution companies and
utilities. Participants in our OTC energy markets must qualify
as eligible commercial participants or eligible commercial
entities under the Commodity Exchange Act.
Market
Data
We offer a variety of market data services for both futures and
OTC markets through our market data subsidiary, ICE Data. ICE
Data compiles and repackages market data derived from trading
activity on our platform into information products that are sold
to a broad customer base extending beyond our core trading
community.
Since its inception, ICE Data has expanded to provide data
services covering our energy futures and OTC markets, as
well as soft agricultural and agricultural commodities, equity
indexes and currency pairs. Market data services for these
segments include publication of daily indices, access to
historical price and other data, view only access to our trading
platform, end of day settlements and pricing data sets, as well
as a service that provides independent validation of
participants own valuations for OTC products.
Our
Competitive Strengths
We have established ourselves as a leading operator of global
regulated futures exchanges and OTC markets. We believe our key
strengths include:
|
|
|
|
|
liquid, diverse global markets and benchmark contracts;
|
|
|
|
diverse and complementary risk management products and services;
|
|
|
|
widely-distributed, leading edge technology for trading and risk
management;
|
|
|
|
market transparency and efficient access to futures and OTC
markets;
|
|
|
|
geographic and product diversity with multiple regulated
exchanges and clearing houses, and global OTC markets; and
|
|
|
|
innovative, customer-focused management with a focus on growth.
|
Liquid,
Diverse Global Markets and Benchmark Contracts
Several of our core products serve as global benchmarks for
managing risk relating to exposure to price movements in the
underlying commodities. We operate the leading market for
trading in Brent crude oil futures, as measured by the volume of
contracts traded in 2008, according to the Futures Industry
Association.
5
The ICE Brent Crude futures contract is the leading benchmark
for pricing light, sweet crude oil produced and consumed outside
of the United States, and is the price reference for
approximately two-thirds of the worlds physical oil.
Similarly, the ICE Gas Oil futures contract is a leading
benchmark for the pricing of a range of refined oil products
outside the United States. We also operate the worlds
second largest market for trading in West Texas Intermediate, or
WTI, crude oil futures, as measured by the volume of contracts
traded in 2008, according to the Futures Industry Association.
The WTI Crude futures contract is the leading benchmark for
pricing light, sweet crude oil delivered and consumed within the
United States. We operate a leading OTC market for energy
contracts, including hundreds of contracts based on natural gas
and electric power hubs, or delivery points, in North America,
as well as certain refined products. We were the first
marketplace in North America to introduce cleared OTC
energy contracts. We believe that cleared OTC energy markets
have increased market liquidity and transparency and attracted
new participants by reducing counterparty credit risk and by
improving capital efficiency. Today, qualified OTC participants
may access both bilateral and cleared markets on our platform.
The following table shows the number and notional value of
commodities futures contracts traded in our most significant
futures markets. The notional value of contracts represents the
aggregate value of the underlying commodities covered by the
contracts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In billions)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In billions)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In billions)
|
|
|
ICE Brent Crude futures
|
|
|
68,368
|
|
|
$
|
6,771.3
|
|
|
|
59,729
|
|
|
$
|
4,293.2
|
|
|
|
44,346
|
|
|
$
|
2,936.2
|
|
ICE WTI Crude futures(1)
|
|
|
51,092
|
|
|
|
5,210.4
|
|
|
|
51,388
|
|
|
|
3,727.2
|
|
|
|
28,673
|
|
|
|
1,919.4
|
|
ICE Gas Oil futures
|
|
|
28,805
|
|
|
|
2,637.2
|
|
|
|
24,510
|
|
|
|
1,582.8
|
|
|
|
18,290
|
|
|
|
1,071.6
|
|
Sugar No. 11 futures and options(2)
|
|
|
36,437
|
|
|
|
492.5
|
|
|
|
26,251
|
|
|
|
289.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Russell index futures and options(3)
|
|
|
17,054
|
|
|
|
1,201.7
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
79.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Trading commenced in February 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Sugar No. 11 futures and options trade on ICE Futures U.S.,
which was acquired in January 2007. |
|
(3) |
|
Russell index futures and options began trading exclusively on
ICE Futures U.S. in September 2008. |
The following table shows the number and notional value of OTC
commodities contracts traded on our electronic platform in our
most significant OTC energy markets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In billions)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In billions)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In billions)
|
|
|
North American natural gas
|
|
|
228,544
|
|
|
$
|
4,531.3
|
|
|
|
157,956
|
|
|
$
|
2,705.6
|
|
|
|
121,047
|
|
|
$
|
2,289.3
|
|
North American power
|
|
|
10,085
|
|
|
|
533.7
|
|
|
|
8,331
|
|
|
|
394.2
|
|
|
|
6,014
|
|
|
|
284.7
|
|
Global oil and refined products
|
|
|
8,334
|
|
|
|
443.8
|
|
|
|
8,471
|
|
|
|
305.9
|
|
|
|
3,772
|
|
|
|
116.3
|
|
Diverse
and Complementary Risk Management Products and
Services
We have developed and offer our customers a diverse array of
products and a broad range of risk management services including
trade execution, market data, pre- and post-trade processing and
clearing services on an integrated platform. We have a history
of developing innovative products and services for the markets
we serve, including electronic trade confirmation, affirmation
and novation for the bilateral OTC markets, independent price
validation services, portfolio compression, credit event
auctions and OTC clearing. Our markets provide important risk
management tools and evolve based on changes in market
conditions, market structure and technological advancements. We
work closely with our customers to create products and services
that meet their requirements. These relationships help us to
anticipate and lead industry changes.
6
Widely-distributed,
Leading Edge Technology for Trading and Risk
Management
Our integrated technology infrastructure is delivered via our
widely accessible electronic trading platform, which provides
centralized and direct access to risk management and trade
execution for a variety of energy, soft agricultural and other
agricultural commodities, and financial products. We operate the
majority of our energy, financial and agricultural markets on
our electronic trading platform. Our trading platform has
enabled us to attract significant liquidity from traditional
market participants, as well as new market entrants seeking the
access, efficiency and ease of execution offered by electronic
trading. We have developed a significant global presence with
thousands of active screens at over 1,500 OTC participant firms
and over 1,100 futures participant firms as of December 31,
2008.
Our participants may access our electronic marketplace through a
variety of means, including through telecommunications hubs in
the United States, Europe, Canada and Asia, via the Internet or
through dedicated lines. We offer various front-end trading
alternatives, including proprietary front-end systems,
independent software vendors, or ISVs, our own front-end called
WebICE and brokerage firms. ISVs allow market participants to
access multiple exchanges through a single interface, which is
integrated with the participants risk management systems.
We have taken a number of steps to increase the accessibility
and connectivity of our electronic platform, including opening
our electronic platform to ISVs and allowing members to develop
their own conformed front-end systems. Our participants can
currently access our platform using 37 ISVs. We do not depend on
the services of any one ISV for access to a significant portion
of our participant base.
We also have made a number of enhancements to our technology
infrastructure and electronic platform to facilitate trading in
futures contracts. Those enhancements include increased speed,
reliability and additional features, such as stop-limits and
extensive implied spread functionality, which allows certain
bids and offers to imply prices from one contract month to
another, as well as the use of formula-based spreadsheet tools
and the development of administrative and monitoring tools.
Our trading platform provides rapid trade execution and is, we
believe, one of the worlds most flexible, efficient and
secure systems for derivatives markets. We have designed our
platform to be highly scalable meaning that we can
expand capacity and add new products and functionality
efficiently at relatively low cost and without disruption to our
markets. Our platform can also be adapted for use in other
markets, as demonstrated by the decision by CCX and ECX to
operate their emissions markets on our trading platform. We
believe that our commitment to investing in technology to
enhance our network infrastructure, electronic trading platform,
clearing and other post-trade processes will continue to
contribute to the growth and development of our business.
Market
Transparency and Efficient Access to Futures and OTC
Markets
Through our highly accessible platform, we offer real-time
market transparency to participants, observers and regulators
for dozens of futures and OTC markets. This transparency has
increased liquidity and the confidence participants have in
transacting in our markets relative to floor or voice traded
markets. Our price transparency and range of market data for the
OTC energy markets meets or surpasses that offered by other OTC
energy markets, which may be beneficial to us in a regulatory
environment favoring transparency.
In addition, we believe that our growth has been driven in part
by our ability to uniquely offer qualified market participants
integrated access to both the futures and OTC markets. We
believe that our demonstrated ability to develop specialized
technology and launch new products for both the futures and OTC
markets provides us with several competitive advantages,
including a larger addressable market, increased domain
knowledge in our markets, including insight into commercial
market participants needs, the ability to offer cross
margining for correlated products, and enhanced market data
offerings. In addition to cleared OTC markets, we continue to
offer bilateral markets for those customers and products where
it is required or preferred.
We believe that by using our electronic platform, market
participants benefit from price transparency and can achieve
price improvement over alternate means of trade execution.
Electronic trade execution offers time
7
and cost efficiencies by providing firm posted prices and
reducing trade-processing errors and back office overhead, and
allows us to accelerate the introduction of new products on our
platform. The combination of electronic trade execution across a
range of commodities and derivatives markets and market data
services facilitates automation by our participants in all
phases of processing from front-office to back-office, and
ranging from trading and risk management to trade settlement.
Geographic
and Product Diversity with Multiple Regulated Exchanges and
Clearing Houses, and Global OTC Markets
Our globally distributed electronic trading platform offers
qualified market participants a single interface to multiple
exchanges, covering five unique product categories, including
agricultural, energy, credit, equity index and foreign exchange
products, as well as a range of OTC energy products. By offering
trading in multiple markets and products we provide our
participants with maximum flexibility to implement their trading
and risk management strategies. We serve customers in dozens of
countries as a result of listing products that are relevant
globally, such as crude oil, credit, sugar, equity indexes and
foreign exchange. Each of our three locally regulated exchanges
is associated with our locally regulated clearing houses. With
recognized and highly respected clearing operations, we believe
that these clearing houses assurance of performance to
their clearing members substantially reduces counterparty risk
and is a critical component of our exchanges identity as a
reliable and secure marketplace for global transactions. With
our acquisition of Creditex in 2008 and the impending launch of
ICE Trust, we will also offer CDS clearing services. While the
credit derivatives business has yet to be fully integrated into
our electronic trading platform, these systems are already
connected to well over 200 buy- and sell-side participants in
the CDS market.
Innovative,
Customer-Focused Management with a Focus on Growth
We strive to foster a culture of customer service, innovation
and growth within our staff and management team. We put an
emphasis on integrity of work and the results achieved to
maintain confidence in our marketplace and in our company. We
offer performance based compensation that includes various forms
of equity ownership in our common stock by a broad base of
employees and that reflects our shared, company-wide objectives.
Our
Growth Strategy
The record consolidated revenues and trading volume we achieved
in 2008 reflect our focus on the implementation and execution of
our long-term growth strategy. We have expanded our core
business organically, developed innovative new products for
global markets, and provided trading-related services to a
broader and more diverse participant base. In addition, we have
completed a number of acquisitions and alliances to leverage our
core strengths and grow our business. We seek to advance our
leadership position in the commodity derivatives markets by
focusing our efforts on the following key strategies for growth:
|
|
|
|
|
attract new market participants;
|
|
|
|
offer additional markets and services across futures and OTC
markets;
|
|
|
|
leverage our extensive risk management capabilities;
|
|
|
|
continue to enhance our technology infrastructure and increase
connectivity; and
|
|
|
|
pursue select strategic opportunities.
|
Attract
New Market Participants
In recent years, our customer base has grown and diversified due
to the emergence of new participants in the commodities markets,
the increased use of hedging programs by commercial enterprises,
our expansion into new markets, the increased access to our
markets as a result of electronic trading, and the increased
allocation to commodities by institutional investors. Market
participants include producers and refiners, utilities and
governments, financial services companies, such as investment
banks, hedge funds, proprietary trading
8
firms and asset managers, as well as industrial and
manufacturing businesses that are increasingly engaging in
hedging, trading and risk management strategies. We believe that
many of these participants have been attracted to our markets in
part due to the need to hedge price volatility and the reduced
barriers to market access. We intend to continue to expand our
customer base by leveraging our existing relationships and our
global sales and marketing team to promote participation in our
markets and by offering a growing range of products and
services, including pre-trade and post-trade processing and
clearing capabilities.
Offer
Additional Markets and Services Across Futures and OTC
Markets
We have grown, and intend to continue to grow, as a result of
our ability to leverage the combination of futures and OTC
markets, clearing services and new product development. Through
our acquisition of Creditex, we have entered the CDS market and
offer a number of innovative products and services. We have also
enhanced our product offerings by entering into strategic
partnerships and exclusive agreements such as our exclusive
license for the Russell index products. We will also seek
opportunities in markets we do not currently serve. We intend to
continue to expand the range of products we offer, both by
product type and contract design, by working with customers and
potential partners to develop new OTC, futures and options
products that provide relevant risk management tools. We may
also seek to license our platform to other exchanges for the
operation of their markets on our platform, as we have with the
CCX, ECX and the Natural Gas Exchange.
Leverage
Our Extensive Risk Management Capabilities
By establishing and maintaining our own clearing operations, we
are able to respond to the dynamic needs of the market for risk
management tools. With the November 2008 launch of our European
clearing house, we now have control of our product development
cycle across all of our markets and will be able to develop and
launch the products our customers require in a timely manner. As
new markets evolve, we intend to leverage our domain knowledge
in clearing and
over-the-counter
markets to serve these global markets. For example, in early
2009 we intend to launch a clearing house for the clearing of
CDS instruments.
Continue
to Enhance our Technology Infrastructure and Increase
Connectivity
We develop and maintain our own network infrastructure and
electronic trading platform to ensure the delivery of a
leading-edge technology platform that meets our markets
demands for transparency and efficiency. Our participants may
access our electronic platform for trading in our markets
through our proprietary front-end, known as WebICE, via a
dedicated line or the Internet, through our application
programming interface, or API, through one of our
telecommunication hubs, through co-location at our data center,
or through the front-end systems developed by any of 37 ISVs.
Furthermore, participants in our markets can access our platform
directly through their own proprietary interfaces or through a
number of brokerage firms. We intend to extend our initiatives
in this area by continuing to increase ease of access and
connectivity with our existing and prospective market
participants.
Pursue
Select Strategic Opportunities
We intend to continue to explore and pursue acquisition and
other strategic opportunities to strengthen our competitive
position and grow our company. We may enter into business
combination transactions, make acquisitions or enter into
strategic partnerships, joint ventures or alliances, any of
which may be material. We may enter into these transactions for
a variety of reasons, including to leverage our existing
strengths into new markets, expand our risk management products
and services, address underserved markets, advance our
technology or take advantage of new developments and potential
changes in the industry.
Our
Products and Services
As a leading operator of global futures and OTC marketplaces, we
seek to provide our participants with centralized and direct
access to the futures and OTC markets for price transparency,
electronic trade execution, clearing services and services that
support their trading and risk management activities. The
primary services
9
we provide are electronic price discovery in futures markets,
trade execution and trade processing in futures and OTC markets,
and the delivery of technology to facilitate these and other
trading and risk management activities. We also offer a broad
range of market data services for the futures and OTC markets.
Regulated
Futures Markets
Our futures markets are fully regulated and are responsible for
carrying out certain self-regulatory functions. Each regulated
exchange has its own compliance, surveillance and market
supervision functions, as well as a framework for disciplining
market participants that do not comply with exchange rules.
Trading in our regulated futures markets is available to our
members and their customers. Customers of our members may obtain
order-routing access to our markets through members. Once trades
are executed on our platform, they are matched and forwarded to
a trade registration system that routes them to the applicable
clearing house for clearing and settlement. Electronic trading
allows participants to execute directly on our platform, when
traditionally orders were executed on a trading floor by floor
brokers.
Regulated
Energy Future Products
We operate regulated markets for energy futures contracts and
options on those contracts through our subsidiary, ICE Futures
Europe. These contracts include the ICE Brent Crude futures
contract, the ICE WTI Crude futures contract, the ICE Gas Oil
futures contract, the ICE ECX CFI and CER futures contracts, the
ICE UK Natural Gas futures contract, the ICE Richards Bay and
Rotterdam coal futures contracts, the gC Newcastle coal futures
contract, the ICE UK Electricity futures contract, the ICE
Unleaded Gasoline Blendstock (RBOB) futures contract, the ICE
Heating Oil futures contract and options based on the ICE Brent
Crude, ICE WTI Crude, ICE ECX CFI and CER, and ICE Gas Oil
futures contracts. The ICE Brent Crude futures contract is based
on forward delivery of the Brent light, sweet grade of crude oil
that originates from the North Sea. Brent crude is a leading
benchmark used to price a range of traded oil products,
including approximately two-thirds of the worlds oil. The
ICE WTI Crude futures contract, also a light, sweet crude, is a
cash-settled contract. The ICE Gas Oil futures contract is a
European heating oil contract and serves as a significant
pricing benchmark for refined oil products particularly in
Europe and Asia.
Regulated
Soft Agricultural and Agricultural Future Products
ICE Futures U.S. is a regulated leading world market for
the trading of soft agricultural commodities, including coffee,
sugar, cotton, frozen concentrate orange juice and cocoa futures
and options contracts. ICE Futures U.S. and its predecessor
companies have offered trading in traditional soft agricultural
commodities for over 100 years and have maintained a strong
franchise in these products. These markets are designed to
provide effective pricing and hedging tools to industry users
worldwide as well as strategic trading opportunities for
individual and institutional investors. These contracts were
listed electronically for the first time in February 2007. The
prices for many of our agricultural contracts serve as global
benchmarks for the physical commodity markets, including Sugar
No. 11 (world raw sugar), Coffee C (Arabica
coffee) and Cotton No. 2 (cotton).
Through close cooperation with agricultural industry
participants, ICE Futures U.S. has supported the
development of innovative and internationally recognized futures
and options contracts that reflect the basic requirements of the
commodity industry. ICE Futures U.S.s contract committees,
in conjunction with industry representatives, continuously
review and adjust contract terms and trading practices to
account for changes in the underlying cash market and to ensure
that the contracts continue to serve ICE Futures U.S.s
commercial users.
Soft agricultural products have historically accounted for most
of ICE Futures U.S.s trading volume. In 2008, soft
agricultural products represented 74.4% of the total number of
futures and options contracts traded in ICE Futures U.S.s
markets.
ICE Futures Canada is the only regulated commodity futures
exchange in Canada and it facilitates the trade of futures and
options on futures contracts for canola and western barley. ICE
Futures Canada, and its
10
predecessor companies, have been operating for over
122 years and have maintained a strong franchise in
agricultural commodities. ICE Futures Canada contracts are
designed to provide effective pricing and hedging tools to
industry users worldwide as well as strategic trading
opportunities for individual and institutional investors. The
price of ICE Futures Canadas canola futures contracts is
the worldwide benchmark. In 2008, canola contracts represented
94.9% of the total number of futures and options contracts
traded in ICE Futures Canadas markets.
Regulated
Financial Future Products
ICE Futures U.S. offers financial products in the currency,
equity index and commodity index markets, including the
U.S. Dollar Index, or USDX, the Russell equity indexes, the
CCI and RJ/CRB and dozens of currency pair futures and options
contracts. In 2008, contracts traded in our financial product
markets represented 25.6% of the total number of contracts
traded in ICE Futures U.S.s futures and options markets.
ICE Futures U.S. offers specialized products such as equity
indexes and cross-rate foreign exchange contracts to complement
its global soft agricultural markets.
ICE Futures U.S. lists futures and options contracts on the
Russell indexes of U.S. equities, beginning with the
Russell 1000 Index in 1999, followed by the Russell 2000 and the
Russell 3000 along with the value and the growth components of
these indexes. In June 2007, ICE entered into an exclusive
licensing agreement with Russell with respect to its
U.S. equity index futures and options on futures. These
rights became exclusive in September 2008, and subject to
achieving specified trading volumes, will remain exclusive
throughout the remainder of the Licensing Agreement, which
extends through June 2014.
We also provide futures and options markets for 42 currency pair
contracts including euro-based, U.S. dollar-based,
yen-based, sterling-based and other useful cross-rates, as well
as the original contract based on the benchmark USDX, which was
introduced in 1985. By identifying interbank market signals and
customer needs, we developed currency contracts and defined
trading procedures that serve institutional financial managers.
These products began being introduced on our electronic platform
in the second half of 2007. In November 2008, we also launched a
suite of million-currency-unit foreign exchange futures
contracts. These new futures contracts, known as ICE Millions,
combine the benefits of futures and OTC products, bringing
transaction efficiencies and risk management tools to the
foreign exchange marketplace. ICE Millions are ten times the
notional value of the original suite of foreign exchange futures
and option contracts traded on ICE Futures U.S.
Clearing
House Function
We operate a clearing house for ICE Futures U.S. through
ICE Clear U.S., for ICE Futures Canada through ICE Clear Canada
and for ICE Futures Europe and our OTC cleared businesses
through ICE Clear Europe. These clearing houses clear, settle
and guarantee to their clearing members the financial
performance of all futures contracts and options on futures
contracts matched through our execution facilities and accepted
by the clearing house from clearing members in our U.S., U.K.
and Canadian regulated futures markets as well as our cleared
OTC markets. Through our clearing houses, we maintain a system
for performance of financial obligations owed to the clearing
members through which buyers and sellers conduct transactions.
This system is supported by several mechanisms, including
rigorous clearing membership requirements, the posting of
original margin deposits, daily
mark-to-market
of positions and payment of variation margin, maintenance of a
guaranty fund in which clearing members maintain deposits with
our clearing houses and broad assessment powers to recoup
financial losses if they arise due to a clearing member
financial default. The amount of margin deposits on hand will
fluctuate over time as a result of, among other things, the
extent of open positions held at any point in time by market
participants and the volatility of the market as reflected in
the margin rates then in effect for such contracts. In addition
to our existing three clearing houses, we are developing a
clearing house to act as a central counterparty in the
registration and clearing of credit default swap transactions.
We are forming a limited purpose bank, ICE Trust, to serve as
the facility to clear credit default swaps transactions.
11
In November 2008, we launched ICE Clear Europe, a clearing house
based in London, as part of our strategic plan to offer clearing
services through wholly-owned clearing businesses in the United
States, the United Kingdom and Canada. Clearing services for our
U.K. energy futures and cleared global OTC energy businesses
were previously outsourced to a third party U.K. clearing house.
Gaining greater control over this core clearing process will
allow us to introduce more products and services to the futures
and OTC markets for broker-dealers and for our customers, as
well as to ensure technology and operational service levels meet
the efficiency standards that we have set within our execution
business. We also believe that this flexibility will allow us to
increase our
speed-to-market
for new cleared products and to expand our products further into
physically-delivered commodity products on a competitive basis
with other derivatives exchanges that manage their own clearing
and risk management services. Control of our own clearing houses
enables us to capture the revenue associated with both the
trading and clearing of our futures and options contracts.
It is our objective to provide a clearing model that benefits
customers and clearing firms alike, through technological
innovation, offering a competitive alternative for clearing for
new products and new exchanges, competitive pricing, and greater
profit participation by member firms and new value-added
services. Longer term, we anticipate that collectively, our
U.S., U.K. and Canadian clearing houses may partner to serve our
global customer base across the commodities and financial
products marketplaces in an innovative and capital efficient
manner. Our clearing strategy is designed to complement our
diverse markets while meeting the risk management, capital and
regulatory requirements of an expanding global marketplace.
We believe our clearing houses are a significant attraction to
our market participants, and an important part of the
functioning of our exchanges. Because the role of the clearing
house is to serve as a central counterparty for each matched
trade, clearing members do not need to evaluate the credit of
each potential counterparty or limit themselves to a selected
set of counterparties. This flexibility increases the potential
liquidity available for each trade. The interposition of our
clearing house as the counterparty for each matched trade allows
our customers to establish a position with one party and then to
offset the position with another party. This contract offsetting
process provides our customers with flexibility in establishing
and adjusting positions.
In order to ensure performance, our clearing houses establish
and monitor financial requirements for our clearing members and
set minimum margin requirements for our traded products. Our
clearing houses use proprietary software, based on an industry
standard margining convention, to determine the appropriate
margin requirements for each clearing member by simulating the
gains and losses of complex portfolios. We typically hold margin
collateral to cover at least 99% of price changes for a given
product within a given historical period.
At each settlement cycle, our clearing houses value, at the
market price prevailing at that time, or
mark-to-market,
all open futures positions and require payments from clearing
members whose positions have lost value and make payments to
clearing members whose positions have gained value. Our clearing
houses
mark-to-market
all open futures positions at least once a day, and in some
cases more often if market volatility warrants.
Marking-to-market
provides both participants in a transaction with an accounting
of their financial obligations under the contract. Having a
mark-to-market
cycle of a minimum of two times a day for ICE Clear
U.S. and once daily for ICE Clear Europe and ICE Clear
Canada helps protect the financial integrity of our clearing
houses, our clearing members and market participants. This
allows our clearing houses to identify quickly any clearing
members that may not be able to satisfy the financial
obligations resulting from changes in the prices of their open
contracts before those financial obligations become
exceptionally large and jeopardize the ability of our clearing
houses to ensure financial performance of their open positions.
All our clearing houses may call multiple intraday original
margin in circumstances where market conditions require they
take additional protection.
As a self-regulatory organization, ICE Clear U.S. has
instituted detailed risk-management policies and procedures to
guard against default risk with respect to cleared contracts. In
order to manage the risk of financial non- performance, we
(i) have established that clearing members maintain at
least $5 million in minimum working capital,
(ii) limit the risk exposure of open positions based upon
the clearing members capital, (iii) require clearing
members to post original margin collateral for all open
positions, and to collect
12
original margin from their customers, (iv) pay and collect
variation margin on a
marked-to-market
basis at least twice daily, (v) require clearing members to
collect funds from under-margined customers, (vi) require
deposits to the guaranty fund from clearing members which would
be available to cover financial non-performance, and
(vii) have broad assessment authority to recoup financial
losses.
ICE Clear Europe has instituted a similar multi-layered risk
management system of rules, policies and procedures to protect
itself in the event of a clearing member default which include
requiring its members to (i) hold a sufficient minimum
level of capital, (ii) make sufficient margin payments as
required under the ICE Clear Europe rules, (iii) have made
a guaranty fund contribution as required by ICE Clear Europe,
(iv) have acceded to the ICE Clear Europe regulations and
thereby accept ICE Clear Europes powers of assessment to
require the provision of additional funds by clearing members in
certain situations consequent on an event of default, and
(v) hold accounts as required under the ICE Clear Europe
regulations at ICE Clear Europe approved financial institutions
in relation to which ICE Clear Europe has established direct
debit mandates in its favor.
ICE Clear Canada has instituted a similar multi-layered risk
management system of rules, policies and procedures to protect
against default which include (i) operational and financial
standards for clearing participants applicable to category of
registration, (ii) requirements for clearing participants
to post original margin for house and client positions and
requirements to collect additional margin from clients,
(iii) assessing and collecting
intra-day
margin payments on a pre-determined basis, (iv) requiring
all clearing participants to pay into a guaranty fund, and
(v) rules requiring all clearing participants to provide
additional monies for the clearing fund in the event of a
default.
We also maintain extensive surveillance and compliance
operations and procedures to monitor and enforce compliance with
rules pertaining to the trading, position sizes, delivery
obligations and financial condition of clearing members. In the
unlikely event of a payment default by a clearing member, the
clearing house would first apply assets of the clearing member
to cover its payment obligation. These assets include original
margin, variation margin and the guaranty fund deposits and any
other available assets. In addition, we would make a demand for
payment pursuant to any applicable guarantee provided to the
clearing houses by the parent of a clearing member. Thereafter,
if the payment default remains unsatisfied, the clearing house
would use the guaranty fund of other clearing members and funds
collected through an assessment against all other solvent
clearing members to satisfy the deficit. We have agreed to
reserve $50.0 million of the $250.0 million available
under our revolving credit facility for use by ICE Clear
U.S. to provide temporary liquidity in the event of default
by a clearing member. In June 2008, the Company entered into a
separate senior unsecured credit agreement which provides for a
364-day
revolving credit facility in the aggregate principal amount of
$150.0 million which is available for operational use
solely by ICE Clear Europe. ICE Clear Canada has arranged a
total of $3.0 million in revolving standby credit
facilities with the Royal Bank of Canada to provide liquidity in
the event of default by a clearing member.
ICE Clear Europe has committed $100.0 million in cash as
part of its guaranty fund, of which $50.0 million will be
available only in the event a clearing member defaults and such
member has used all its available funds to settle the position.
The $50.0 million will be used before other funds in the
guaranty fund are used. If additional cash is required to settle
positions, then the remaining $50.0 million will be called
pro-rata
along with other non-defaulting ICE Clear Europe clearing
members deposits in the guaranty fund. ICE Clear Europe is
also insured up to $100.0 million in the event of a
clearing member default, which would be called upon after the
guaranty funds are depleted and prior to any clearing member
assessment.
As part of the powers and procedures designed to backstop
financial obligations in the event of a default, each of the
clearing houses may levy assessments on all of our clearing
members if there are insufficient funds available to cover a
deficit. There is no limit on this assessment of each clearing
member unless the clearing member has notified the clearing
house that it is withdrawing as a clearing member. However,
before the clearing member can withdraw from the clearing house,
the clearing house can assess the clearing member an amount up
to two times the initial amount of the clearing members
guaranty fund balance to cover any remaining default. Despite
this authority to levy assessments, there can be no assurance
that the relevant clearing members will have the financial
resources available to pay, or will not choose to be expelled
from
13
membership rather than pay, any such assessments. Despite the
risk mitigation techniques adopted by, and the other powers and
procedures implemented by our clearing houses, which are
designed to, among other things, minimize the potential risks
associated with the occurrence of monetary defaults, there can
be no assurance that these powers and procedures will prevent
such defaults or will otherwise function to preserve the
liquidity of the clearing houses.
Our clearing houses have an excellent risk management track
record. ICE Clear Europe, ICE Clear U.S. and ICE Clear
Canada, and their predecessor companies, have never experienced
an incident of a clearing member default which has required the
use of the guaranty funds or assets of the clearing house.
Global
OTC Marketplace
Our OTC markets comprise distinct energy and CDS markets. Our
global energy markets are offered directly through our
transparent, electronic platform, which offers real-time access
to the liquidity in our markets including the
complete range of bids, offers, trades and volume posted for
hundreds of contracts listed on our platform. Our platform
displays a live ticker for all contracts traded in our OTC
energy markets and provides information relating to each trade,
such as the volume weighted average price and transacted volumes
by contract. We offer fast, secure and anonymous trade matching
services, which, we believe, generally are offered at a lower
cost compared to traditional means of execution.
Our electronic platform provides trade execution on the basis of
extensive, real-time price data where trades are processed
accurately, rapidly and at minimal cost. We have designed our
technology platform to ensure the secure, high-speed flow of
data from trading desks through the various stages of trade
processing. Qualified participants executing in our markets
benefit from straight-through processing whereby trades are
automatically confirmed and routed to back office departments
and risk management systems. We believe that the broad
availability of real-time OTC energy market access and data,
together with the availability of cleared OTC contracts at the
same price as bilateral products, has allowed us to achieve a
critical mass of liquidity in our OTC markets. Historically,
trades in the OTC commodities markets have been executed as
bilateral contracts in which each counterparty bears the credit
and/or
delivery risk of the other. Our platform allows participants to
pre-approve trading counterparties and establish parameters for
trading with each counterparty, thereby enforcing internal risk
management policies. If participants choose not to trade
products on a cleared basis, they may set firm-wide limits on
tenor (duration) and the total daily value of trades that its
traders may conduct with a particular counterparty in a given
market. Our OTC markets for CDS are operated separately by
Creditex using voice brokers as well as a proprietary electronic
execution platform.
OTC
Energy Products Overview
We offer market participants a wide selection of derivative
contracts, as well as contracts for physical delivery of energy
commodities, to satisfy their risk management and trading
objectives. We offer trading in over 1,200 unique contracts as a
result of the availability of various combinations of products,
locations and strips meaning the duration or
settlement date of the contract. Excluding the strip element,
over 31,700 unique contracts based on products and hub locations
were traded in our OTC market in 2008. A substantial portion of
the trading volume in our OTC markets relates to approximately
20-25 highly
liquid contracts in natural gas, power and oil. For these
contracts, the highest degree of market liquidity resides in the
prompt, or front month, contracts, with decreasing liquidity for
longer-dated contracts.
We characterize the range of instruments that participants may
trade in our markets by reference to type of commodity (such as
global oil products, North American power, North American gas,
etc.), products (such as forwards and swaps, differentials and
spreads, and OTC options) and contracts (meaning products
specified by delivery dates).
14
The following table indicates the number of unique commodities,
products and contracts traded in our OTC energy business for the
periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Commodities markets traded
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products traded
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
|
|
1,041
|
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts traded
|
|
|
31,715
|
|
|
|
23,780
|
|
|
|
17,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In February 2008, we acquired YellowJacket. YellowJacket is a
financial technology firm that operates OTC electronic trade
negotiation technology which offers a range of trading tools
including instant communication, negotiation and data for
various financial markets. With the YellowJacket platform,
traders can aggregate and consolidate fragmented instant
message-based communications and key transaction details on a
single screen.
In March 2007, we purchased the intellectual property rights to
widely-used OTC natural gas price indexes, called NGI indexes,
from Intelligence Press, Inc. While Intelligence Press has
retained the rights to collect data, publish newsletters and
charge its customers for such services, we have the exclusive
right to charge and collect fees for those seeking license
arrangements for the NGI indexes for use in clearing and
settlement. We will begin exclusive trading on the NGI indexes
starting in May 2009.
In March 2007, we entered into an agreement with Natural Gas
Exchange, Inc., or NGX, to form a technology and clearing
alliance for the North American natural gas and Canadian power
markets. Under the arrangement, the cleared and bilateral
markets for North American physical natural gas and Canadian
electricity operated by NGX and by us is offered together
through our electronic trading platform. In turn, NGX serves as
the physical settlement facility for these products, in a
process also referred to as physical clearance. We recognize a
portion of transaction fee revenues generated by products traded
and cleared under this arrangement. The NGX products were listed
on our electronic trading platform beginning in February 2008.
We also acquired the exclusive licensing rights to the benchmark
NGX natural gas indexes.
OTC
Cleared Energy Products Overview
We developed and introduced the concept of cleared OTC energy
contracts in 2002, which provide participants with access to
centralized clearing and settlement arrangements. Cleared OTC
contracts are available for trading on the same screen and are
charged the same execution fees as bilaterally traded contracts.
As of December 31, 2008, we listed 112 cleared energy
contracts, including 37 cleared natural gas contracts, 44
cleared power contracts and 31 cleared oil contracts, all of
which are financially settled. Transaction and clearing fees
derived from trade execution in cleared electronic OTC contracts
were $248.3 million for the year ended December 31,
2008 and represented 62.7% of our total OTC revenues during the
year ended December 31, 2008, net of intersegment fees.
This compares to $169.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 or 70.2% of our total OTC revenues for
the year ended December 31, 2007.
The introduction of cleared OTC contracts has reduced bilateral
credit risk and the amount of capital our participants are
required to post on each OTC trade, as well as the resources
required to enter into multiple negotiated bilateral settlement
agreements to enable trading with other counterparties. In
addition, the availability of clearing for both OTC and futures
contracts traded in our markets enables our participants to
cross-margin their futures and OTC positions meaning
that a participants position in its futures or OTC trades
may be offset against each other, subject to correlation and
other risk management measures, thereby reducing the total
amount of capital the participant must deposit with the futures
commission merchant clearing members, known as FCMs. In order to
clear transactions executed on our platform, a participant must
therefore either be a member of the clearing house itself, or
have an account relationship with an FCM that is a member. FCMs
clear transactions for participants in substantially the same
way they clear futures transactions for customers. Specifically,
each FCM acts as the conduit for payments, such as margin and
settlement, required to be made by participants to the clearing
house, and for payments due to participants from the clearing
house. There are currently over 30 FCMs clearing OTC
transactions in our markets.
15
Consistent with our ICE Futures Europe business, we did not
derive any direct revenues from OTC clearing in the past and
participants paid the clearing fees directly to a third party
clearing house. However, upon the launch of ICE Clear Europe in
November 2008, we now capture clearing revenues associated with
our global OTC segment, the amount of which will depend upon
many considerations, including but not limited to transaction
volume, pricing and new products.
We have extended the availability of our cleared OTC contracts
to voice brokers in our industry through our block trading
facility. Block trades are those trades executed in the voice
broker market, typically over the telephone, and then
transmitted to us electronically for clearing. We believe that
our block trading facility is a valuable part of our cleared
business as it serves to expand our open interest. As of
December 31, 2008, open interest in our cleared OTC
contracts was 9.4 million contracts in North American
natural gas and power, and global oil, as compared to
7.2 million contracts as of December 31, 2007. Open
interest refers to the total number of contracts that are
currently open, in other words, contracts that have been traded
but not yet liquidated by either an offsetting trade, exercise,
expiration or assignment.
OTC
Credit Products Overview
The most widely used type of credit derivative is a credit
default swap, or CDS, that involves the transfer between two
parties of credit risk related to fixed income instruments such
as corporate debt securities. The buyer of the CDS contract, who
owns the underlying credit or otherwise has a credit risk
exposure to the writer of the credit, will make a payment or
series of payments to the seller in return for protection
against default, a credit rating downgrade or other negative
credit event. CDS are principally used to hedge against the
credit default of a particular reference entity. CDS are traded
primarily in the OTC market.
In August 2008, we acquired Creditex, a market leader and
innovator in the execution and processing of CDS, with markets
spanning the United States, Europe and Asia. Creditex serves the
most liquid segments of the traded OTC CDS market, including
indexes and single-name instruments. Creditex facilitates
dealer-to-dealer
execution of credit derivative transactions by providing voice,
hybrid, and electronic trading services for dealers utilizing
the Creditex RealTime trading platform. Creditex is
a leading
dealer-to-dealer
execution agent focused on facilitating trading in the global
credit derivatives market and providing intermediary trading
services for OTC credit derivative products. The Creditex
RealTime trading platform connects buyers and sellers of credit
derivatives and corporate bonds and serves as a facilitator of
price discovery. While the Creditex RealTime trading platform
initially focused on the highly liquid CDS indexes, it has
expanded to include
e-trading of
single-name CDS, emerging market CDS, highly liquid structured
products, and, most recently, corporate bonds. RealTimes
functionality has been designed to be easy-to-use, highly
scalable and easily integrated into dealers existing
trading systems.
Dealers have the option of trading CDS electronically with no
broker communication (electronic trading), calling their broker
for market information and data but still transacting
electronically (hybrid trading), or trading directly through
their broker (voice trading). The market factors supporting
voice trading include CDS with reduced liquidity, which makes
electronic price discovery difficult, very large transactions,
for which brokers can facilitate a trade with reduced market
impact, and complex transactions. The market factors supporting
hybrid trading include the unique trading preferences of
individual traders, traders desire for a high level of
customer service and traders needs for market information
even in highly liquid markets. The market factors supporting
electronic trading include mature CDS markets with significant
liquidity which enable traders to go directly to the market,
ready pricing given availability of data, and fast and
inexpensive access to markets.
The flexibility to provide voice, hybrid, or electronic trading
solutions maximizes value for Creditex clients who can choose
the trading solution that best suits their specific needs. While
the majority of U.S. trades are still voice-brokered,
electronic trading is the dominant trading means in the European
market and has become an increasingly large portion of global
trading.
Creditex owns T-Zero, an electronic platform that automates
post-trade processing for the
dealer-to-client
and
dealer-to-dealer
segments of the CDS market. T-Zero provides an industry-wide
straight-through-processing, or STP, platform for the
dealer-to-dealer and
dealer-to-client
market community. T-Zero allows market
16
participants to accurately capture and confirm trade details on
the day of trade and to electronically deliver the information
to downstream systems for confirmation and settlement.
CDS generally are not cleared by a central clearing house. The
current bilateral nature of the market leaves participants
exposed to counterparty risk. When financial counterparties
cannot rely on each others credit, and are unable to hedge
their own credit risk, they stop lending to each other and the
credit markets may freeze, thus illustrating the importance of
well functioning markets. Trade processing for CDS is relatively
less transparent and less capital efficient compared to
utilizing the benefits of central clearing. Therefore,
developing a market structure that brings transparency and
mitigates counterparty credit risk by clearing CDS transactions
is an important initiative for ICE and Creditex, as well as for
certain of our competitors. In order to address the need for
central counterparty clearing, we are forming a limited purpose
bank, ICE Trust, to serve as a clearing house for CDS on a
global basis.
Market
Data Services
Through ICE Data, we generate market information and indexes
based primarily upon auditable transaction data derived from
actual bid and offer postings and trades executed in our
markets. Therefore, this information is not affected by
subjective estimation or selective polling, the methodologies
that currently prevail in the OTC markets. Each trading day, we
deliver proprietary market data directly from our OTC market to
the desktops of thousands of market participants.
ICE Data publishes ICE daily indexes for our spot natural gas
and power markets with respect to over 90 of the most
active gas hubs and over 20 of the most active power hubs in
North America. ICE Data transmits our daily indexes via
e-mail to
approximately 10,000 energy industry participants on a
complimentary basis each trading day.
The ICE Data end of day report is a comprehensive electronic
summary of trading activity in our OTC markets. The report
features indicative price statistics, such as last price, high
and low price, total volume, volume-weighted average price, bid
and offer, closing bid and closing offer, for all natural gas
and power contracts that are traded or quoted on our platform.
This information is sold as various subscription based products.
Also, for both our futures and OTC markets, we offer view only
access to market participants who are not active traders, but
who still desire access to real-time prices of physical and
financial energy derivative contracts.
ICE Datas market price validation, or MPV, service
provides independent, consensus forward curve and option values
for long-dated global energy contracts on a monthly basis. On
the last business day of each month, MPV service participant
companies, representing the worlds largest energy and
commodities trading entities, submit their month-end forward
curve and option prices for over 450 global commodity contracts.
MPV service participants use these consensus values to validate
internal forward curves,
mark-to-market
their month-end portfolios and establish profit and loss
valuations in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standard
Board, or FASB, and the International Accounting Standards
Boards recommendations concerning the treatment and
valuation of energy derivative contracts.
We provide our real-time futures data to data distributors,
commonly called quote vendors, or QVs. These companies such as
Bloomberg or Reuters then package this data into real-time,
tick,
intra-day,
delayed,
end-of-day
and historical data packages to sell to end users. The real-time
packages are accessed on a subscription basis and the
appropriate exchange fee is paid for each
user/screen taking ICE Futures U.S., ICE Futures Europe or ICE
Futures Canada data. The futures data includes the trading
activity in those markets, including bids, offers, trades and
other key price information. End users include a range of
financial information providers, FCMs, pension funds, financial
services companies, funds, insurance companies, commodity pools
and individual investors.
17
Our
Participant Base
Futures
Business Participant Base
Participants of ICE Futures Europe include representatives from
segments of the underlying industries served by our energy
markets, including, among others, the oil, gas and power
industries. Participants currently trade in our energy futures
markets, either directly as members or through an ICE Futures
Europe member. The participant base in our energy futures
business is globally dispersed, although we believe a
significant proportion of our participants are concentrated in
major financial centers in North America, the
United Kingdom, Continental Europe and Asia. We have
obtained regulatory clearance or received legal advice
confirming that there is no legal or regulatory impediment for
the location of screens for electronic trading in our energy
futures markets in 56 jurisdictions for ICE Futures Europe,
including the United States, the United Kingdom, Singapore,
Dubai and all of the member countries of the European Economic
Area. Like our OTC participant base, the participant base in our
energy futures business has grown significantly since we
acquired ICE Futures Europe in 2001. Memberships in our energy
futures markets was 148 members as of December 31, 2008
compared to 144 members as of December 31, 2007.
The five most active clearing members of ICE Futures Europe,
which handle cleared trades for their own accounts and on behalf
of their customers, accounted for 65.5%, 57.7% and 51.0% of our
energy futures business revenues, net of intersegment fees, for
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. Revenues from one member accounted for 19.7%,
18.2% and 15.4% of our energy futures business revenues, net of
intersegment fees, for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006, respectively. Revenues from two other members
accounted for 17.0% and 14.3% of our energy futures business
revenues, net of intersegment fees, for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and 14.8% and 10.7% of our energy futures
business revenues, net of intersegment fees, for the year ended
December 31, 2007 and another member accounted for 12.1% of
our energy futures business revenues, net of intersegment fees,
for the year ended December 31, 2006. A substantial part of
the trading activity of these participants typically represents
trades executed on behalf of their respective clients, rather
than by the firm for their own account.
Trades in our energy futures markets may only be executed in the
name of an ICE Futures Europe member for its own or others
accounts. To become an ICE Futures Europe member, an applicant
must complete an application form, undergo a due diligence
review and execute an agreement stating that it agrees to be
bound by ICE Futures Europe regulations. All energy futures
trades executed on our electronic platform are overseen by or
attributable to responsible individuals. Each member
may register one or more responsible individuals, who are
responsible for trading activities of both the member and its
customers, and who are accountable to ICE Futures Europe for the
conduct of trades executed in the members name. As of
December 31, 2008, there were over 2,400 responsible
individuals registered in our energy futures market.
ICE Futures U.S.s trading members include representatives
from segments of the underlying industries served by our soft
agricultural and financial markets, including, among others, the
sugar, coffee and cotton industries. We believe that our
existing liquidity and the history of ICE Futures U.S.s
predecessors in trading these commodity products for over
100 years has enabled the development of our strong
industry relationships. A trading membership in ICE Futures
U.S. enables the holder to trade any of the exchanges
futures and options contracts. ICE Futures U.S. also issues
trading permits that allow the holder to trade a specified
category of products, such as options or financial contracts. To
gain membership status, a person must be approved by the
membership committee. All floor brokers and floor traders must
be appropriately registered under CFTC regulations and must be
guaranteed by a clearing member of ICE Clear U.S.
ICE Futures U.S. has approval to offer its screens in 26
jurisdictions. Traders in these futures markets include hedgers,
speculators and investors. Hedgers are commercial firms that
trade futures and options to reduce their price risk exposure in
the cash market, protect their profit margins and assist in
business planning. Investors and speculators, who seek to profit
from fluctuating prices, typically place an order through FCMs,
or through introducing brokers, who have clearing relationships
with FCMs. Investors also participate in the markets by pooling
their funds with other investors in collective investment
vehicles known as commodity pools, which are managed by
commodity pool operators and commodity trading advisors. The
CFTC requires commodity
18
professionals to be registered by the National Futures
Association a CFTC-designated futures association
that is charged with enforcing ethical, financial and customer
protection standards in the futures industry.
The five most active clearing members of ICE Futures U.S., which
handle cleared trades for their own accounts and on behalf of
their customers, accounted for 40.4% and 38.4% of ICE Futures
U.S. business revenues, net of intersegment fees, for the
year ended December 31, 2008 and for period from
January 12, 2007 to December 31, 2007, respectively.
Revenues from two members accounted for 12.3% and 11.2% of our
ICE Futures U.S. business revenues, net of intersegment
fees, for the year ended December 31, 2008. No members
accounted for more than 10% for the period from January 12,
2007 to December 31, 2007.
ICE Futures Canadas market participants include
representatives from companies that hedge their cash products in
the markets, including international grain companies, feed lots,
and food processors, as well as FCMs and liquidity providers.
Individuals and companies can access ICE Futures Canadas
markets by registering as participants with ICE Futures Canada,
or trading through a registered participant. To gain participant
status, a company or individual submits standard written
application/agreement forms. All FCMs must be appropriately
registered with the statutory regulatory authority in their home
jurisdiction and any self-regulatory organizations required by
their statutory regulatory authority. All entities that have
direct trading status must be cleared by a registered clearing
participant of ICE Clear Canada.
ICE Futures Canada has approval to allow trading directly in its
marketplace on screens in Canada, other than in Quebec, and in
the United States through a no-action letter issued by staff of
the CFTC dated December 2004. Trading is permitted in the United
Kingdom pursuant to a reliance on the overseas persons exemption.
The five most active clearing members of ICE Futures Canada,
which handle cleared trades for their own accounts and on behalf
of their customers, accounted for 60.6% and 51.6% of ICE Futures
Canada business revenues, net of intersegment fees, for the year
ended December 31, 2008 and for the period from
August 27, 2007 to December 31, 2007, respectively.
Revenues from two members accounted for 13.1% and 13.0%,
respectively, of ICE Futures Canada revenues for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and for 13.2% and 11.4%, respectively, of
ICE Futures Canada business revenues for the period from
August 27, 2007 to December 31, 2007.
OTC
Business Participant Base
Pursuant to the Commodity Exchange Act, our global OTC energy
markets are principals-only markets, designed for professional
traders or other commercial market participants. Stringent
requirements apply to participants, which include some of the
worlds largest energy companies, financial institutions
and other active contributors to trading volume in global
commodities markets. They include oil and gas producers and
refiners, power stations and utilities, chemical companies,
transportation companies, banks, funds and other energy market
participants. Our participant base is global in breadth, with
thousands of participants located in 17 countries. The five most
active trading participants together accounted for 15.4%, 17.8%
and 23.3% of our OTC business revenues, net of intersegment
fees, during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and
2006, respectively. No participant accounted for more than 10%
of our OTC business revenues for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 or 2006.
Trading in our OTC energy markets is available to a participant
that qualifies as an eligible commercial entity, as defined by
the Commodity Exchange Act and rules promulgated by the CFTC.
Eligible commercial entities must satisfy certain asset-holding
and other criteria and include entities that, in connection with
their business, incur risks relating to a particular commodity
or have a demonstrable ability to make or take delivery of that
commodity, as well as financial institutions that provide risk
management or hedging services to those entities. Pursuant to
the CFTCs oversight of our markets, since October 2006, we
report all cleared positions in our primary OTC contracts on a
daily basis to the CFTC through futures-style large trader
reports. In addition, during 2007, we added regulatory staff to
our OTC business and anticipate gaining increased authority to
have oversight of certain of these markets in the future. In May
2008, Congress passed legislation to increase regulation of OTC
markets as part of the Farm Bill. The legislation requires that
OTC electronic trading facilities
19
assume self regulatory responsibilities, such as market
monitoring and establishing position limits or accountability
limits, over contracts that serve a significant price discovery
function. See Regulation below.
We require each qualified participant to execute a participant
agreement, which governs the terms and conditions of its
relationship with each participant and grants the participant a
non-exclusive, non-transferable, revocable license to access our
platform. While we generally establish the same contractual
terms for all of our users, in connection with our entry into
new commodities markets, we have from time to time agreed to
minor modifications to the terms of our participant agreement
for trading in new products. We expect that any future services
that we may introduce will also be covered by our participant
agreement, as we generally have a unilateral right to amend our
terms with advance notice. As the OTC markets mature and
conventions change, our participant agreement provides us with
considerable flexibility to manage our relationship with our
participants on an ongoing basis.
The user base of Creditexs RealTime trading platform is
comprised of credit default swap, proprietary and corporate bond
trading desks at major international sell-side institutional
banks. Clients of T-Zeros post-trade confirmation and
processing platform include most major CDS market participants
on both the buy-side and sell-side. T-Zero also provides
post-transactional processing services to other CDS inter-dealer
brokers. Users of both the Creditex and T-Zero platforms must
meet applicable jurisdictional and regulatory requirements
before being provided with access to the platforms.
Market
Data Participant Base
Our market data revenues are derived from a diverse customer
base including the worlds largest commodity companies,
leading financial institutions, proprietary trading firms,
natural gas distribution companies and utilities, hedge funds
and private investors. From an OTC perspective, a large
proportion of our market data revenues are derived from sales of
market data to companies executing trades on our platform. We
also continue to see an increasingly diverse and expanding list
of non-participant companies purchasing our data and subscribing
to view-only screens. The primary customer base for our futures
market data revenues are the market data redistributors
themselves such as Bloomberg, CQG, Interactive Data Corporation
or Reuters who redistribute our real-time pricing data and remit
to us a real-time exchange fee based on the users access
to our data. For both OTC and futures market data, end users
include corporate traders, risk managers, individual
speculators, consultants and analysts. No participant accounted
for more than 10% of our market data revenues for the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007 or 2006.
Product
Development
We leverage our customer relationships, global distribution,
technology infrastructure and software development capabilities
to diversify our products and services. New product development
is an ongoing process that is part of our daily operations. We
are continually developing, evaluating and testing new products
for introduction in our futures and OTC markets. Our goal is to
create innovative solutions in anticipation of, or in response
to, changing conditions in the markets for commodities trading
to better serve our participant base. The majority of our
product development relates to evaluating new contracts or
markets. We generally are able to develop and launch new OTC
contracts for trading within a number of weeks. New contracts in
our futures markets must be reviewed and approved as needed by
the FSA, the CFTC, the MSC or possibly other foreign regulators.
We do not incur separate, identifiable material costs in
association with the development of new products
such costs are embedded in our normal costs of operation.
While we have historically developed our products and services
internally, we also periodically evaluate and enter into
strategic partnerships to identify opportunities to develop
meaningful new products and services. If we believe our success
will be enhanced by collaboration with a third party, we will
enter into a licensing arrangement or other strategic
arrangement. In support of our product development goals, we
rely on the input of our product management, clearing,
technology and sales teams, who we believe are well positioned
to discern and anticipate our participants needs.
20
Technology
Technology is a key component of our business strategy which we
regard as crucial to our success. We design, build and operate
the majority of our own software systems and believe that having
control of our technology allows us to be more responsive to the
needs of our customers, support the dynamic nature of our
business and deliver the highest quality markets and data. Our
systems are built using
state-of-the-art
software technologies and best practices including modern
programming languages, component-based architectures, and a
combination of leading-edge open source and proprietary
technology products. We leverage proven industry standards from
leading hardware, software and networking providers, as well as
emerging technologies we believe will give us a competitive edge
in technology development. We take a customer focused, iterative
and results-driven approach to software design and development
that allows us to deliver innovative, high quality solutions
quickly and effectively.
Significant investments in production planning, quality
assurance and certification processes have enhanced our ability
to expedite the delivery of the system enhancements we develop
for our participants. We believe in offering our customers a
choice and, as such, our electronic platform is accessible from
anywhere in the world via Internet, traditional
telecommunication hubs, the ICE Global Network, or through
co-location at our data center. Users can access our electronic
trading platform via our own web based interface, via ISVs, or
via one of our application programming interfaces, or API. Over
the past three years we have intensely focused on enhancing
capacity and performance of our electronic trading platform.
This effort has resulted in the top performing platform in our
industry, as measured by transaction times and reliability
relative to other electronic trading platforms.
We also develop and operate software systems used to operate
services such as clearing, market data and electronic
confirmations. Our clearing infrastructure is designed to be
easily extendable to support integration with additional
clearing interfaces. We currently support clearing integration
to four clearing houses; externally, KCBOT and The Clearing
Corporation, internally, ICE Clear U.S. and ICE Clear
Europe. These clearing houses facilitate clearing and settling
our markets.
Personnel
Our technology staff is among the most productive and efficient
in the industry. We carefully recruit talented individuals, and
once in the organization, we foster a culture of
entrepreneurship, innovation, customer service and results. Our
electronic platform is designed, built and operated by our
personnel. As of December 31, 2008, we employed a team of
373 experienced technology specialists including; product
managers, project managers, system architects, software
developers, network engineers, security specialists, performance
engineers, systems and quality analysts, database
administrators, website designers, helpdesk and support
personnel.
Trading
Systems, Software and Applications
Trading
Platform
At the core of our trading business are our electronic trading
platforms. Our primary platform supports all of our futures
exchanges as well as our OTC energy and credit marketplaces.
Order matching, with a proprietary spread-implication algorithm,
is at the core of our electronic platform. Large-scale
enterprise servers provide the processing capacity for the
matching engine, which captures price requests by our
participants and matches trades within a matter of milliseconds.
Our primary platform supports functionality for trading in
bilateral and cleared OTC, futures and options markets. For
futures products, the platform supports a myriad of order types,
matching algorithms, price reasonability checks, inter-commodity
spread pricing and real-time risk management. In addition, we
have developed a multi-generation implied matching engine that
automatically discovers best bid and offer prices throughout the
forward curve. For OTC products we also support bilateral
trading with real-time credit risk management between
counterparties by commodity and company. We also offer brokers a
facility to block trades for all their products. Our core
functionality is available on a single platform for all products
we offer
21
electronically, rendering it highly flexible and straightforward
to maintain. As a result, enhancements made for one product can
easily be propagated to other products.
The technology behind the Creditex and T-Zero platforms is
proprietary to Creditex and was developed by Creditex and
T-Zeros in-house technology staff. For OTC credit
products, Creditexs proprietary RealTime trading platform
connects buyers and sellers of credit derivatives, including
single-name CDS, emerging markets CDS, structured products and
corporate bonds, as well as serves as a facilitator of price
discovery. RealTimes easy-to-use functionality is highly
scalable and quickly integrates into dealers existing
trading systems. The core RealTime platform technology can
easily accommodate enhancements and add-ons in order to support
additional products and rapidly respond to market demands for
new functionalities. The RealTime platform also serves as the
centralized electronic site for accessing CDS fixings and credit
event auctions for the CDS marketplace. T-Zero is an API-based
affirmation platform that is connected to most of the major
buy-side, sell-side and inter-dealer participants within the
credit derivatives market. T-Zero offers three services that are
available both via its API and its own user interface, including
dealer-to-client
trade affirmation, electronic connectivity to downstream
operational vendors, and STP services for inter-dealer and
dealer-to-client
execution platforms and
dealer-to-client
trade affirmation.
Trading
Platform Performance
Speed, reliability, scalability and capacity are critical
performance criteria for electronic trading platforms. A
substantial portion of our operating budget is dedicated to
system design, development and operations in order to achieve
high levels of overall system performance. Our platform delivers
the fastest published round-trip transaction time in the
commodity markets, with average transaction times today of three
milliseconds in our futures markets, and a blended average of
seven milliseconds for futures and OTC markets.
In our business, latency performance is not only measured in
average time, but also in the percentage of outliers
particularly during peak trading periods. We define outliers as
any request taking over 50 milliseconds. These outlier
metrics characterize the consistency of the platforms
performance. Not only is our platform fast, it is also
consistent with better than 99.5% of transactions completing in
less than 50 milliseconds during the busiest of trading
periods. Our platform is also highly reliable, achieving 99.9%
availability during 2008. Planning for capacity, performance and
reliability is something we take very seriously and has become a
core competency. We continually run benchmark tests and monitor
our production systems and make adjustments as necessary in
order to insure that our systems can handle approximately two to
three times our peak transactions in our highest volume products.
WebICE
Connectivity to our trading platform for our futures and OTC
energy markets is available through our web based front-end,
multiple ISVs and APIs. We provide secure access to our
electronic platform via our front-end, WebICE. WebICE serves as
a customizable, feature rich front-end to our trading platform.
WebICE also provides an easy to use and easily accessible
front-end for the entire suite of futures and OTC products we
offer. Participants can access our platform globally via the
Internet by logging in via our website homepage. Our platform
can be accessed using a number of operating systems, including
Microsoft Windows Vista, 2000/XP, Linux and Mac OS. Assuming all
legal agreements are in place, a new participant can be
configured and on our electronic platform within ten minutes.
Over 10,000 users globally access our electronic platform each
trading day via WebICE.
Application
Programming Interfaces (APIs)
We selectively offer participants use of APIs which allow
developers to create customized applications and services around
our electronic platform to suit their specific needs.
Participants using APIs are able to link their own internal
computer systems to our platform and enable algorithmic trading,
risk management, data services, and straight through processing.
Our APIs also enable ISVs to adapt their products to our
platform, thereby offering our participants a wide variety of
front-end choices in addition to our WebICE interface.
22
We offer the following APIs for direct access customers and ISVs:
|
|
|
|
|
Order Routing The order routing specification
is based on the industry standard Financial Information
eXchange, or FIX, protocol. The FIX message specification is
fully compliant with the standard protocol.
|
|
|
|
Market Data we offer a light weight,
technology platform independent market data feed called iMpact.
This feed provides full depth of book and can be used by both
trading clients and Quote vendors.
|
|
|
|
Trade Capture We currently offer a java and
FIX based API to capture all trades done by a given company
which can be used by firms to manage position and risk of their
participants.
|
|
|
|
OTC For OTC energy products that have complex
bilateral and cleared trading requirements, we offer a
Java-based API which can be used to trade these products on the
trading platform.
|
Clearing
Systems Technology
A broad range of trade management and clearing services are
offered through our clearing houses. As with the trading system,
we design, develop, operate and license, as appropriate,
significant portions of our clearing technology. Our core
clearing system, Extensible Clearing System, or ECS, supports
open and delivery position management, real-time trade and
post-trade accounting, risk management (daily and
intra-day
cash,
mark-to-market/option
premium, and initial margin using the CME
SPAN®
algorithm), collateral management, daily settlement and banking.
ECS is a
state-of-the
art system offering open Internet-based connectivity and
integration options for clearing member access to user and
account management, position reporting and collateral
management. ECS also has an extensive reporting system which
delivers on-line access to daily and historical reports in
multiple formats, as well as an extensive currency delivery
system to manage the delivery and payment of currency
settlements. As with the trading platform, we take a proactive
approach to enhancing the reliability, capacity and performance
of our clearing systems.
Data
Centers, Global Network and Distribution
In January 2008, we completed our move to a state-of -the art
hosting center in Chicago, Illinois. The new hosting facility
includes expanded co-location capabilities coupled with the
physical space, electric power, and bandwidth necessary to
accommodate continued growth in our messaging traffic, trading
volume and customer base. We also maintain a disaster recovery
site for our technology systems in Atlanta, Georgia.
We offer access to our electronic markets through a broad range
of interfaces including dedicated lines, server co-location data
centers, telecommunications hubs in the United States, Europe
and Asia, and directly via the Internet. In 2007, we completed
the build-out of the ICE Global Fiber Network which consists of
high speed dedicated fiber-optic lines connecting data hubs in
New York, Atlanta, Chicago, London and Singapore with the
exchanges primary and disaster recovery data centers. This
network offers customers an inexpensive, high speed,
high-bandwidth, fiber network solution to routing trading and
pricing messages between each of these data hub locations and to
the primary and secondary data centers.
In addition to our global network, the accessibility of our
platform through the Internet differentiates our markets and
serves to attract liquidity in our markets. As of
December 31, 2008, we had thousands of active connections
to our platform from over 1,500 OTC participant firms and over
1,100 futures participant firms. As of the fourth quarter of
2008, there were an average of 10,400 simultaneous active
connections daily during peak trading hours. One active
connection can represent many individual traders. In addition,
we have 37 conformed ISVs interfacing to our trading platform.
As a result, we have the potential to attract thousands of
additional participants who may trade in our markets through
ISVs or through our own front-end. Many ISVs present a single
connection while facilitating numerous individual participants
actually entering orders and trading on our exchange.
For high velocity traders interested in the lowest latency
possible we offer server co-location space at our data centers.
This service allows customers to deploy their trading
servers and applications which virtually
23
eliminate data transmission latency between the customer and the
exchange. The combination of our easy to use trading and data
APIs, rapid trade execution and co-location services enables us
to attract algorithmic traders, which are growing liquidity
contributors in many of our markets.
Security
and Disaster Recovery
Physical and digital security are each critical to the operation
of our platform. We employ leading-edge digital security
technology and processes, including high level encryption
technology, complex passwords, multiple firewalls, network level
virus detection, intrusion detection systems and secured
servers. We use a multi-tiered firewall scheme to control access
to our network and have incorporated several protective features
into our electronic platform at the application layers to ensure
the integrity of participant data and connectivity. While our
electronic platform is accessible over the Internet, we have
added functionality that allows us to restrict platform access
to designated IP addresses, if so desired by a participant.
We use a remote data center to provide a point of redundancy for
our trading technology. Our
back-up
disaster recovery facility fully replicates our primary data
center and is designed to ensure the uninterrupted operation of
our electronic platforms functionality in the event of
external threats, unforeseen disasters or internal failures. In
the event of a major disruption, participants connecting to our
electronic platform would be rerouted automatically to the
disaster recovery facility. Our primary data center continuously
collects and saves all trade information and periodically
transmits it to our disaster recover site. For that reason, we
expect that our disaster recovery system would have current, and
in most cases real-time, information in the event of a platform
outage.
Support
Services
All of our participants have access via
e-mail,
online and telephone to our specialized help desk, which
provides support with respect to general technical, business and
administrative questions, and is staffed 24 hours a day
from Sunday at 5:30 p.m. Eastern Time until Friday at
6:30 p.m. Eastern Time. At all other times, support
personnel are available to assist our participants via mobile
phone and
e-mail.
Competition
The markets in which we operate are highly competitive. We face
competition in all aspects of our business from a number of
different enterprises, both domestic and international,
including traditional exchanges, electronic trading platforms
and voice brokers. Prior to the passage of the Commodity Futures
Modernization Act of 2000, or the CFMA, futures trading was
generally required to take place on, or subject to the rules of,
a federally designated contract market. The costs and difficulty
of obtaining contract market designation and corresponding
regulatory requirements created significant barriers to entry
for competing exchanges. The CFMA and other changing market
dynamics have led to increasing competition from a number of
different domestic and international sources of varied size,
business objectives and resources.
We believe we compete on the basis of a number of factors,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
depth and liquidity of markets;
|
|
|
|
price transparency;
|
|
|
|
reliability and speed of trade execution and processing;
|
|
|
|
technological capabilities and innovation;
|
|
|
|
breadth of product range;
|
|
|
|
rate and quality of new product developments;
|
|
|
|
quality of service;
|
|
|
|
distribution and ease of connectivity;
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
mid- and back-office service offerings, including differentiated
and value-added services;
|
|
|
|
transaction costs; and
|
|
|
|
reputation.
|
We believe that we compete favorably with respect to these
factors, and that our deep, liquid markets, breadth of product
offerings, new product development, and efficient, secure
settlement, clearing and support services distinguish us from
our competitors. We believe that in order to maintain our
competitive position, we must continue to develop new and
innovative products and services; enhance our technology
infrastructure; maintain liquidity and offer competitive
transaction costs.
Our
Principal Competitors
Currently, our principal competitors include exchanges such as
the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, or CME, the New York Mercantile
Exchange, or NYMEX, which is now part of the CME, and London
International Financial Futures and Options Exchange, or LIFFE,
which is now part of NYSE Euronext. In addition, we currently
compete with voice brokers active in the OTC commodities and
credit derivatives markets, other electronic trading platforms
for derivatives and market data vendors.
Competition
in our Futures Business
In our energy futures business, ICE Futures Europe, we currently
compete with global exchanges such as CME and European natural
gas and power exchanges, such as the European Energy Exchange.
Other exchanges may, in the future, offer trading in contracts
that compete with our exchanges. In addition, the recent
consolidation of, and development of industry alliances has
resulted in a growing number of and well-capitalized trading
services providers, which compete with all or portions of our
business.
ICE Futures U.S. faces competition from traditional
exchanges as well as from new entrants to the derivatives
exchange sector. According to the Futures Industry Association,
ICE Futures U.S. is currently the third largest derivatives
exchange in the United States. The CME, the largest derivatives
exchange in the United States, competes with ICE Futures
U.S. in its markets for foreign currency and equity index
contracts.
ICE Futures U.S. also faces competition abroad from NYSE
Euronext. Currently, ICE Futures U.S. competes directly
with NYSE Euronext in the cocoa, sugar and coffee markets. ICE
Futures U.S. also competes on a limited basis with other
exchanges such as the Tokyo Grain Exchange and the Brazilian
Mercantile and Futures Exchange. At any time, a regional
exchange in an emerging market country, such as India or China,
or a producer country could attract enough activity from outside
its borders to compete with ICE Futures U.S.s status as
the benchmark pricing market for a given commodity.
ICE Futures Canada competes primarily with NYSE Euronexts
rapeseed contract and, to a lesser extent, the Australian
Securities Exchanges canola futures contract.
In addition to competition from derivates exchanges that offer
commodity products, our futures business also faces competition
from other exchanges, electronic trading systems, third party
clearing houses, FCMs and technology firms.
Competition
in Our OTC Business
Certain financial services or technology companies, in addition
to the competitors named above, have entered the OTC electronic
trading services market. Additional joint ventures and consortia
could form, or have been formed, to provide services that would
potentially compete with certain services that we provide.
Others may acquire the capacity to compete with us through
acquisitions. If we expand into new markets in the future, we
could face significant competition. Creditex continues to face
competition from other large inter-dealer brokers in the credit
derivative market, including GFI Group Inc., Tullet Prebon plc
and ICAP plc. These competitors have many of the same clients as
Creditex, and there is no guarantee that Creditexs clients
will not direct more of their CDS business to one or more of
Creditexs competitors. There is also a high level
25
of competition among inter-dealer brokers for broker employees,
and there is no guarantee that Creditexs broker employees
will not be hired by competing firms.
Intellectual
Property
We rely on a wide range of intellectual property. We own or have
a license to use all of the software that is essential to the
operation of our electronic platform, much of which has been
internally-developed by our technology team since our inception.
In addition to our software, we regard certain business methods
and our brand names, marketing elements, logos and market data
to be valuable intellectual property. We protect this
intellectual property by means of patent, trademark, service
mark, copyright and trade secret laws, contractual restrictions
on disclosure and other methods.
We currently have licenses to use several U.S. patents,
including the Togher family of patents, which relate to the way
in which bids and offers are displayed on an electronic trading
system in a manner that permits parties to act only on those
bids and offers from counterparties with whom the party has
available credit. In connection with the settlement of patent
infringement litigation with EBS Dealing Resources, Inc., or
EBS, we obtained from EBS a worldwide, fully paid, non-exclusive
license to use technology covered under patents known as the
Togher patents (presently issued or to be issued in the future
claiming priority to U.S. patent application 07/830,408).
As a fully paid license, we pay no royalties to EBS on an
ongoing basis. The EBS license expires on the latest expiration
of the underlying patents. Additionally, in May 2006, we
received a U.S. patent jointly owned with NYMEX for an
implied market trading system. The joint patent covers a method
for a computer-based trading system that implies spread markets
for multiple real or implied spread markets.
We cannot guarantee that the Togher patents, the joint patent
with NYMEX or any other patents that we may license or acquire
in the future, are or will be valid and enforceable.
We have several U.S. and foreign patent applications
pending, including with respect to our electronic trade
confirmation service, our ICEMaker system, and our OTC clearing
service. Creditex has several U.S. and foreign patent
applications pending with respect to its RealTime electronic
trading platform, as well as with respect to its T-Zero
electronic post-transactional confirmation and processing
platform and its Q-WIXX electronic trading platform for large
portfolio credit derivative transactions. We can provide no
assurance that any of these applications will result in the
issuance of patents.
We have received several U.S. federal registrations on
trademarks used in our business, including
IntercontinentalExchange,
IntercontinentalExchange + design, ICE
and ICE + design. We have also received
U.S. federal registrations on other services or products we
provide, including but not limited to, ICE DATA,
ICE Futures, and WEBICE.. In addition,
we have several foreign and U.S. applications pending for
other marks used in our business. For instance, in the United
States we have applications pending for the following marks,
including but not limited to: ICE Clear, ICE
Clear U.S., ICE Clear Canada, ICE Clear
Europe, ICE Futures U.S., ICE Futures
Canada, and ICE Futures Europe.. In Canada, we
have applications pending for the following marks, including but
limited to: ICE, ICE Clear, ICE
Clear U.S., ICE Clear Canada, ICE Clear
Europe, ICE Futures, ICE Futures
U.S., ICE Futures Canada, ICE Futures
Europe and, ICE DATA. In the European Union,
we have applications pending for the following marks, including
but not limited to: ICE Clear, ICE Clear
U.S., ICE Clear Canada, ICE Clear
Europe, ICE Futures U.S., ICE Futures
Canada and ICE Futures Europe,. In Singapore,
we have applications pending for the following marks, including
but not limited to: ICE Clear, ICE Clear
U.S., ICE Clear Canada, ICE Clear
Europe, ICE Futures U.S., ICE Futures
Canada and ICE Futures Europe. We can provide
no assurance that any of these applications will mature into
registered trademarks.
ICE Futures U.S.s key strength is the brand recognition of
its soft commodity products. Unlike our
U.S. competitors, which have larger corporate identities,
ICE Futures U.S.s primary brand identity is derived from
the individual benchmark contracts that it trades. ICE Futures
U.S.s most significant brands are Coffee C,
Sugar No. 11, Cotton No. 2 and the U.S. Dollar
Index. We protect these brand names, as well as other products
and services by relying on trademark law and contractual
safeguards. ICE Futures U.S. owns the following registered
trademarks, among others: Coffee C, Sugar
No. 11, Sugar No. 14, Cotton No. 2,
26
U.S. Dollar Index, and USDX. ICE Futures U.S also licenses
various trademarks of the Russell Investment Group in connection
with its exclusive license to use the trademarks of the Russell
Investment Group. ICE Futures U.S. also licenses the NYSE
Composite Index from NYSE Euronext. ICE Futures U.S.s
license with the NYSE Euronext is an exclusive license to list
and trade futures and options contracts on the NYSE Composite
Index. ICE Futures U.S. also has an exclusive license with
Reuters America, LLC to list and trade futures and options
contracts on the Reuters Jefferies CRB Futures Price Index and
the Continuous Commodity Index.
We also have several foreign trademark registrations, including:
ICE, IntercontinentalExchange, and
IntercontinentalExchange + design, in the European
Union; ICEMAKER, ICE Futures and
ICE Futures + block design in Singapore; and
ICEBLOCK in the European Union, China, Hong Kong,
Norway, Singapore, and Switzerland.
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K
also contains additional trade names, trademarks and service
marks of our and of other companies. We do not intend the use or
display of other parties trademarks, trade names or
service marks to imply, and this use or display should not be
construed to imply, our endorsement or sponsorship of these
other parties, their endorsement or sponsorship of it, or any
other relationship between it and these other parties.
Sales
As of December 31, 2008, we employed 147 full-time
sales personnel. Our global sales team is managed by a futures
industry sales and marketing professional and is comprised
primarily of former brokers and traders with extensive
experience and established relationships within the commodity
trading community. Since our futures business is highly
regulated, we also employ sales and marketing staff
knowledgeable with respect to the regulatory constraints upon
marketing in this field.
Our marketing strategy is designed to expand relationships with
existing participants through the provision of value-added
products and services, technology support and product
information, as well as to attract new participants, including
those in markets and geographic areas where we do not currently
have a strong presence. We also seek to build brand awareness
and promote greater public understanding of our business,
including how our technology can improve current approaches to
price discovery and risk management in the energy markets.
We use a cross-promotional sales and marketing team for our
futures and OTC businesses. We believe this approach is
consistent with, and will provide more effective support of, the
underlying emphasis of our business model an open
architecture with flexibility that allows us to anticipate and
respond rapidly to customers and evolving trends in the markets
for commodities trading, while maintaining separate markets on a
regulatory basis.
We typically pursue our marketing goals through a combination of
on-line promotion through our website, third party websites,
e-mail,
print advertising,
one-on-one
client relationship management and participation in trade shows
and conferences. From time to time, we also provide commission
rate discounts of limited duration to support new product
launches. We participate in a number of domestic and
international trade shows, conferences and seminars regarding
futures, options on futures and OTC markets and other marketing
events designed to inform market participants about our products.
Our marketing department designs materials, information and
programs to educate market participants about our products and
services. We seek to educate these users about changes in
product design, margin requirements and product usage. Our sales
and marketing effort typically involves the development of
personal relationships with market participants who actively use
our markets to ensure that our product and service offerings are
based on their needs.
27
Employees
As of December 31, 2008, we had a total of
795 employees, with 216 employees at our headquarters
in Atlanta, 360 in New York, 158 in London and a total of
61 employees in our Winnipeg, Houston, Chicago, Singapore
and Calgary offices.
Business
Continuity Planning and Disaster Recovery
We maintain comprehensive business continuity and disaster
recovery plans and facilities to provide continuous availability
in the event of a business disruption or disaster.
Planning
We maintain incident and crisis management plans that address
how we would respond to a crisis event at any of our locations
world wide. We are committed to continuously understanding and
evaluating business risks and their impact on operations,
providing training to employees and performing exercises to
validate the effectiveness of our plans by participating in
industry sponsored disaster recovery and business continuity
exercises. We have invested in technology that will allow us to
manage incidents, track results and continuously update our
plans.
Data
Centers
We use a remote data center to provide a point of redundancy for
our trading technology. Our
back-up
facility fully replicates our primary data center and is
designed to ensure the uninterrupted operation of our electronic
platforms functionality in the face of external threats,
unforeseen disasters or internal failures. In the event of an
emergency, participants connecting to our electronic platform
would be rerouted automatically to the
back-up
facility. Our primary data center continuously collects and
saves all trade information and periodically transmits it to our
back-up
facility. For that reason, we expect that our disaster recovery
system would have current, and in most cases real-time,
information in the event of a platform outage. In the event that
we were required to complete a changeover to our
back-up
disaster facility, we anticipate that our platform would
experience less than three hours of down time. Our primary data
center is currently located in Chicago, Illinois. We currently
maintain a disaster recovery hot-site in a secure Tier-4 data
center in Atlanta, Georgia.
People
Office facilities are protected against physical unavailability
via our incident management plans. Dedicated business continuity
facilities in Atlanta, New York and London are maintained for
employee relocation in the event that a main office is
unavailable. Incident management plans place a priority on the
protection of our employees.
Regulation
We are primarily subject to the jurisdiction of regulatory
agencies in the United States, the United Kingdom and
Canada. With respect to the ICE Futures Europe products, we have
permission to allow screen based access to our platform from 56
jurisdictions. With respect to the ICE Futures
U.S. products, we have permission to allow screen based
access to our platform from 26 jurisdictions. With respect to
the ICE Futures Canada products, we have permission from Canada
(except Quebec), and the United States and are able to
facilitate trading under a statutory exemption in the United
Kingdom. In light of recent events in the broader financial
markets, we anticipate that our markets will continue to be the
subject of enhanced legislative and regulatory scrutiny. We
expect additional regulatory and legislative changes in our
markets and some of these changes could adversely affect our
business. Please refer to the Risk Factors section
below for a description of these regulatory and legislative
risks and uncertainties.
28
Regulation
of Our OTC Business in the United States
We operate our OTC energy electronic platform as an exempt
commercial market under the Commodity Exchange Act and
regulations of the CFTC. The CFTC generally oversees, but does
not currently substantively regulate, the trading of OTC energy
derivative contracts on our platform. Each of our OTC
participants must qualify as eligible commercial entities, as
defined by the Commodity Exchange Act, and each participant must
trade for its own account, as a principal. Eligible commercial
entities include entities with at least $10 million in
assets that incur risks (other than price risk) relating to a
particular commodity or have a demonstrable ability to make or
take delivery of that commodity, as well as entities that
regularly purchase or sell commodities or related contracts that
are either (i) funds offered to participants that do not
meet specified sophistication standards that have (or are part
of a group of funds that collectively have) at least
$1 billion in assets, or (ii) other types of entities
that have, or are part of a group that has, at least
$100 million in assets. We have also obtained orders from
the CFTC permitting us to treat floor brokers and floor traders
on U.S. exchanges and ICE Futures Europe as eligible
commercial entities, subject to their meeting certain
requirements. As an exempt commercial market, we are required to
comply with access, reporting and record-keeping requirements of
the CFTC. Our OTC energy business is not otherwise currently
subject to substantive regulation by the CFTC or other
U.S. regulatory authorities. However, both the CFTC and the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, or FERC, have view only
access to our trading screens on a real-time basis. In addition,
we are required to:
|
|
|
|
|
report to the CFTC certain information regarding transactions in
products that are subject to the CFTCs jurisdiction and
that meet certain specified trading volume levels;
|
|
|
|
report to the CFTC certain large trader position information for
our cleared OTC natural gas markets pursuant to special calls
issued by the CFTC; and
|
|
|
|
record and report to the CFTC complaints that we receive of
alleged fraud or manipulative trading activity related to
certain of our products.
|
In May 2008, Congress passed legislation to increase regulation
of OTC markets as part of the Farm Bill. The legislation
requires that OTC electronic trading facilities assume self
regulatory responsibilities, such as market monitoring and
establishing position limits or accountability limits, over
contracts that serve a significant price discovery function.
Presently, we believe that we would be required under the
legislation to assume regulatory responsibilities over at least
one OTC contract, the Henry Hub natural gas swap. In December
2008, the CFTC proposed rules to implement the legislation. In
addition to the self regulatory responsibilities, the CFTC has
proposed that OTC electronic trading facilities impose volume
accountability limits on bilateral transactions, which could
deter trading on our platform. In addition, we would incur
additional costs in order to comply with new regulations in the
OTC markets, although we do not believe that on a consolidated
basis they are material. In addition, the legislation would
require us to become a registrant of the CFTC, which could mean
that we may have to pay a regulatory fee on each trade to a
registered futures association.
Creditex is authorized and regulated by the FSA to operate the
Creditex RealTime platform and facilitate the conclusion of
transactions of credit derivative instruments and corporate
bonds. It has FSA regulatory approval to deal as principal or
agent. The Creditex platform is open to eligible counterparties
and professional clients as defined by the Markets in Financial
Instruments Directive. Creditexs services are not
available to retail consumers. T-Zero is also regulated by the
FSA and authorized to provide services in the UK. In order to
retain their status as FSA registered entities, Creditex and
T-Zero are required to meet various regulatory requirements in
the UK.
In addition, while trading in CDS is currently largely
unregulated, a number of proposals have been made to impose
various regulatory requirements or limitations on the trading of
CDS. Currently, one bill before Congress would give jurisdiction
over CDS to the SEC, while another proposed bill would give the
CFTC jurisdiction and require all OTC derivatives, including
CDS, to be traded on a regulated exchange. Finally, one bill has
been proposed to ban market participants from engaging in a
credit default swap transaction unless the participant owns the
underlying bond. At this time, it is unclear whether any
requirements or limitations will
29
be adopted with respect to CDS transactions or, if so, what the
scope or content will be. However, the adoption of any
regulatory requirements or limitations could adversely affect
our CDS business.
Regulation
of Our ICE Futures Europe and Other U.K.
Businesses
In the United Kingdom, we also engage in a variety of activities
related to our business through subsidiary entities that are
subject to regulation by the U.K.s FSA. ICE Futures Europe
is recognized as a U.K. investment exchange and ICE Clear Europe
is recognized as a U.K. clearing house by the FSA in accordance
with the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, or FSMA. As
such, ICE Futures Europe maintains front-line regulatory
responsibility for its markets. In order to retain their status
as U.K. Recognised Bodies, ICE Futures Europe and ICE Clear
Europe are required to meet various legislative and regulatory
requirements. Failure to comply with these requirements could
subject ICE Futures Europe or ICE Clear Europe to significant
penalties, including de-recognition.
Further, we engage in sales and marketing activities in relation
to our OTC business through our subsidiary ICE Markets Limited,
or ICE Markets, which is authorized and regulated by the FSA as
an arranger of deals in investments and as an agency broker.
The regulatory framework in relation to ICE Futures
Europes status as a recognized investment exchange is
supplemented by a series of legislative provisions regulating
the conduct of participants in the regulated market.
Importantly, FSMA contains provisions making it an offense for
participants to engage in certain market behavior and prohibits
market abuse through the misuse of information, the giving of
false or misleading impressions or the creation of market
distortions. Breaches of those provisions give rise to the risk
of sanctions, including financial penalties. It should be noted
that under FSMA ICE Futures Europe is a recognized investment
exchange, and ICE Clear Europe is a recognized clearing house,
enjoy statutory immunity in respect of any claims for damages
brought against them relating to any actions undertaken (or in
respect of any action they have failed to take) in good faith,
in the discharge of their regulatory functions.
The Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (Directive
2004/39/EC) came into force on November 1, 2007, and
introduced a harmonized approach to the licensing of services
relating to commodity derivatives across the European Economic
Area. The legislation also imposed greater regulatory burdens on
E.U.-based operators of regulated markets, alternative trading
systems and authorized firms in the commodity derivatives area.
The legislation also introduced the concept of a pan-European
passport allowing ICE Futures Europe to offer
services in all European Economic Area member states in which
our participants are based on the basis of UK regulation. This
legislation is consistent with other initiatives introduced to
provide a more harmonized approach to European regulation, for
example, the Market Abuse Directive (Directive
2003/06/EC)
which came into force in October 2004 introducing a specific
prohibition against insider dealing in commodity derivative
products.
In June 2008, the CFTC modified ICE Futures Europes
no action letter to require ICE Futures Europe to
adopt position limits and position accountability levels for its
energy contracts for products with U.S. delivery points or
which reference the settlement price of a U.S. designated
contract market. The modification to the no action letter also
required ICE Futures Europe to provide additional trading
information to the CFTC to permit the CFTC to incorporate such
information into its large trader reporting system. The products
impacted include ICE Futures Europes WTI crude oil
contract, its RBOB gasoline contract, and its New York
Harbor heating oil contract. ICE Futures Europe has complied
with reporting obligations of the no action letter, and
instituted position limits on the applicable contracts beginning
with January 2009 expiry.
Regulation
of Our ICE Futures U.S. Business
ICE Futures U.S.s operations are subject to extensive
regulation by the CFTC under the Commodity Exchange Act. The
Commodity Exchange Act generally requires that futures trading
conducted in the United States be conducted on a commodity
exchange designated as a contract market by the CFTC. It also
establishes non-financial criteria for an exchange to be
designated to list futures and options contracts. Designation as
a contract market for the trading of futures contracts is
non-exclusive. This means that the CFTC may designate other
exchanges as contract markets for trading in the same or similar
contracts. As a
30
designated contract market, ICE Futures U.S. is a
self-regulatory organization that has instituted detailed rules
and procedures to comply with the core principles
applicable to it under the Commodity Exchange Act. ICE Futures
U.S. also has surveillance and compliance operations and
procedures to monitor and enforce compliance with its rules, and
ICE Futures U.S. is periodically audited by the CFTC with
respect to the fulfillment of its self-regulatory programs in
these areas. The cost of regulatory compliance is substantial.
Regulation
of Our ICE Futures Canada Business
ICE Futures Canadas operations are subject to extensive
regulation by the Manitoba Securities Commission, or MSC, under
the CFA. The CFA requires that an organization must be
recognized and registered before it can carry on the business of
a futures exchange. It establishes financial and non-financial
criteria for an exchange. Registration and recognition under the
CFA is non-exclusive. This means that the MSC may recognize and
register additional exchanges as futures exchanges for trading
in the same or similar contracts. In addition, ICE Futures
Canada is also recognized by the MSC as a self-regulatory
organization and is required to institute and maintain detailed
rules and procedures to fulfill its obligations. ICE Futures
Canada also has surveillance and compliance operations and
procedures to monitor and enforce compliance by market
participants with its rules, and ICE Futures Canada is under the
audit jurisdiction of the MSC with respect to these
self-regulatory functions. ICE Futures Canada has a significant
number of trading terminals in the United States for which
it has received a no action letter. The no action letter
requires it to comply with the requirements of the CFTC
including making regular filings. The cost of regulatory
compliance is substantial.
Industry
Overview
The derivatives and commodities markets include trading in both
physical commodities contracts and derivative
instruments instruments that derive their value from
an underlying commodity or index across a wide
variety of products. Derivative instruments provide a means for
hedging price risk, asset allocation, speculation or arbitrage.
Contracts for physical commodities allow counterparties to
contract for the delivery of the underlying physical asset.
Trading in futures, options on futures, and OTC products offers
a way to protect against and potentially profit
from price changes in financial instruments and
physical commodities. Futures contracts are standardized
agreements to buy or sell a commodity or financial product at a
specified price in the future. The buyer and seller of a futures
contract agree on a price today for a product to be delivered or
settled and paid for in the future. Each contract specifies the
quantity of the product and the time of delivery or payment. An
option on a futures contract is the right, but not the
obligation, to buy or sell a futures contract at a specified
price on or before a certain expiration date. In the OTC
markets, swap contracts are the primary instrument used to
reduce or gain exposure to price movements related to a
commodity or financial product. Swap contracts are typically
less standardized than futures contracts, and are typically
financially settled against either a futures contract price or
an index price in order to hedge against or gain exposure to
commodity price fluctuations. Our customer base includes
professional traders, financial institutions, institutional and
individual investors, corporations, manufacturers, commodity
producers and refiners, and governmental bodies.
The
Futures Market
A futures exchange typically operates as an auction market,
where trading is conducted either on an electronic platform or
on an open-outcry trading floor. In an auction market, prices
are established publicly by participants posting bids, or buying
indications, and offers, or indications to sell. A futures
exchange offers trading of standardized contracts and provides
access to a centralized clearing system. Commodity futures
exchanges are regulated in the United States by the CFTC.
Commodity futures exchanges are regulated in the United Kingdom
by the FSA and in Canada by the MSC. In a typical futures
market, participants can trade two types of instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
Futures: A future is a standardized contract
to buy or sell a specified quantity of an underlying asset
during a particular month (an exact delivery date or a range of
dates will be specified). Contract sizes are standardized and
differ by product. For example, the ICE Brent Crude futures
contract has a
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
contract quantity of 1,000 net barrels, or 42,000
U.S. gallons. The price of the futures contract is
determined through the auction process on the exchange. Futures
contracts are settled through either physical delivery or cash
settlement, depending on the contract specification.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options: An option is a contract that conveys
to the buyer the right, but not the obligation, to call (buy) or
put (sell) an underlying futures contract at a price determined
at the time of the execution of the option.
|
All futures contracts and options on futures contracts are
cleared through a clearing house, acting as a central
counterparty. Clearing is the procedure by which the
counterparty risk for each futures and options contract traded
on an exchange or OTC market is managed by a central
counterparty which stands as buyer to every seller and seller to
every buyer usually using an open offer or novation contractual
mechanic. By interposing itself between the member firm parties
of every trade, the clearing house guarantees each member firm
partys performance, and eliminates the need to evaluate
counterparty credit risk. FCMs function, in turn, as
intermediaries between market participants and a clearing house.
In effect, the clearing house takes on the counterparty credit
risk of the FCM, and the FCM assumes the credit risk of each of
its client market participants, which is partially offset by
capital held by the FCM with respect to each of its client
market participants.
The
OTC Market
Over-the-counter,
or OTC, is a term used to describe traded products that are not
listed on a futures exchange as standardized contracts. In this
market, market participants have historically entered into
negotiated, bilateral contracts, although in recent years
participants have begun to take advantage of cleared OTC
contracts that, like futures contracts, are standardized and
cleared through a central clearing house.
In contrast to the limited number of futures contracts available
for trading on futures exchanges, participants in the OTC
markets have the ability to trade both standardized and
customized contracts, where counterparties can specify contract
terms, such as the underlying commodity, delivery date and
location, term and contract size. Furthermore, while exchanges
typically limit their hours of operation and restrict direct
trading access to a limited number of exchange members, OTC
markets typically operate around the clock and tend to have
regulatory requirements on market participation. Our electronic
OTC energy markets operate seven days a week for 23 hours
per day.
Financially- or cash-settled OTC contracts are classified as
derivatives meaning that the contract is settled
through cash payments based on the value of the underlying
commodity, rather than through physical delivery of the
commodity. Physical contracts provide for settlement through
physical delivery of the underlying commodity. Physical
contracts may be entered into for either immediate delivery of a
commodity, in the cash or spot market, or for
delivery of a commodity at a specified time in the future, in
the forward market. Forward contract prices are
generally based on the spot market prices of the underlying
commodity, since long-term contracts evolve into short-term
contracts over time.
Industry
Trends
We believe that the increasing interest in derivatives trading
is being driven primarily by the following key factors:
|
|
|
|
|
Continued Adoption of Electronic
Trading: Innovations in technology have increased
the speed of communications and the availability of information,
enabling market participants to access and participate in the
markets more easily, quickly and cost efficiently. During the
last decade, the use of electronic trading has become
increasingly prevalent, and offers a number of advantages
relative to floor- or telephone-based trading. These include the
ability to offer a larger number of contracts, to increase
distribution and access via the benefits of the network
effect, as well as increased speed of information and
increased market transparency.
|
|
|
|
Increased Reliance on Derivatives Markets for Risk
Management: The barriers to entry for
participating in derivatives markets have traditionally been
significant. However, in recent years, a considerable
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
erosion of these barriers has occurred largely due to the
preference for electronic trading and the transition away from
floor-based, membership-based markets. In addition to electronic
trading, other changes in market structure contributing to lower
barriers to entry include declining exchange membership fees,
use of ISVs and the introduction of cleared OTC contracts. In
addition, many companies have increasingly sought to hedge
exposure to the risk of adverse price movements by relying on
the derivatives markets. For example, today many industrial and
commercial users of natural gas may directly access the markets
to monitor prices and hedge against adverse price movements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Innovations in Product Development and
Clearing: With increased reliance on the
derivatives markets for hedging, the need for new or specialized
instruments has led to the establishment of new traded markets
and product development over the past decade. For example, in
the credit markets, banks access the credit derivatives market
to hedge exposure to their credit portfolios, establishing the
credit default swap market over the past decade. Moreover, the
use of a central counterparty clearing house in previously
bilateral markets such as
over-the-counter
energy and credit markets has resulted in greater liquidity and
transparency, thereby attracting additional market participation
and product development.
|
|
|
|
New Market Participants: In recent years, as
market access has increased and new products have been
introduced, growth in trading volumes among most asset classes
has been driven in part by diverse participation in derivatives
markets by producers, industrials, financial institutions, hedge
funds, proprietary trading firms and retail investors globally.
|
Available
Information
Our principal executive offices are located at 2100 RiverEdge
Parkway, Suite 500, Atlanta, Georgia 30328. Our main
telephone number is
(770) 857-4700.
We are required to file reports and other information with the
SEC. A copy of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
as well as any future Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q,
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
and any amendments to such reports are, or will be, available
free of charge, on the Internet at the Companys website
(http://www.theice.com)
as soon as reasonably practicable after we file such reports
with, or furnish such reports to, the SEC. A copy of these
filings is also available at the SECs website
(www.sec.gov). The reference to our website address does
not constitute incorporation by reference of the information
contained on the website and should not be considered part of
this report. Our reports, excluding exhibits, are also available
free of charge by mail upon written request to our Secretary at
the address listed above. You may read and copy any documents
filed by ICE at the SECs Public Reference Room at
100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549.
Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information on the Public Reference Room.
In addition, we have posted on our website the charters for our
(i) Audit Committee, (ii) Compensation Committee and
(iii) Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, as
well as our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which includes
our Whistleblower Hotline information, Board of Directors
Governance Principles and Board Communication Policy and
Governance Hotline. We will provide a copy of these documents
without charge to stockholders upon request.
You should carefully consider the following risk factors, as
well as other information contained in or incorporated by
reference in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The risks and uncertainties described below are those that we
currently believe may materially affect us. Other risks and
uncertainties that we do not presently consider to be material
or of which we are not presently aware may become important
factors that affect our company in the future. If any of the
risks discussed below actually occur, our business, financial
condition, operating results, or cash flows could be materially
adversely affected.
33
Risks Relating to Our Business
We
face intense competition that could materially and adversely
affect our business. If we are not able to compete successfully,
our business will be adversely impacted.
We face intense competition in all aspects of our business. If
we are not able to compete successfully our business could be
materially impacted, including our ability to survive. We
believe competition in our industry is based on a number of
important factors including, but not limited to, market
liquidity, transparency, technology advancements, platform speed
and reliability, new product offerings, pricing and risk
management capabilities.
The industry in which we operate is highly competitive and we
expect competition to continue to intensify in the future. Our
current competitors, both domestically and internationally, are
numerous. While we have achieved success in recent years in
growing our business and diversifying, there are routinely new
market entrants that provide various challenges to the markets
that we operate. Additionally, merger and acquisition activity
in the industry remains robust, rendering some competitors
significantly larger than us with greater capital resources.
Numerous entities have made recent announcements to enhance
their existing electronic derivative trading capabilities or to
launch new derivative trading platforms. Several of these firms
have applied for and received regulatory approval to begin
operations.
We currently compete with:
|
|
|
|
|
regulated, diversified futures exchanges globally that offer
trading in a variety of asset classes similar to those offered
by us such as energy, agriculture, equity index and foreign
exchange;
|
|
|
|
voice brokers active in the global commodities and credit
markets;
|
|
|
|
existing and newly formed electronic trading platforms for OTC
markets;
|
|
|
|
other clearing houses;
|
|
|
|
market data and information vendors; and
|
|
|
|
possible consortiums of customers and the above listed
competitors that may pool their competitive advantages to
establish new exchanges, trading platforms or clearing
facilities.
|
The global derivatives industry has grown more competitive due
to increasing consolidation and evolving markets. Competition in
the market for derivatives trading has intensified in connection
with the increase in electronic trading platforms and the desire
by existing exchanges to diversify their product base, which
could negatively impact our trading volumes and profitability.
Conditions
in global financial markets may adversely affect our trading
volumes and market liquidity and may put the funds of our
clearing houses at risk.
Our business is primarily transaction-based, and declines in
trading volumes and market liquidity would adversely affect our
business and profitability. Recently, global financial markets
have experienced significant and adverse conditions, including a
freezing of credit, substantially increased volatility, outflows
of customer funds and investments, losses resulting from
declining asset values, defaults on loans and reduced liquidity.
These events have resulted in the failure of certain financial
services firms, have led other firms to seek mergers with
commercial banks and have led other firms to become regulated
bank holding companies. Many of the financial services firms
that have been adversely impacted by the financial crisis are
active participants in our markets. The trading volumes in our
markets could decline substantially if our market participants
reduce their level of trading activity for any reason, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
a reduction in the number of traders that use our platform;
|
|
|
|
a reduction in trading demand by customers or a decision to
curtail or cease speculative trading;
|
|
|
|
heightened capital maintenance requirements resulting from new
regulation or mandated reductions in existing leverage;
|
|
|
|
a reduced access to capital required to fund trading activities;
|
|
|
|
significant defaults by issuers of debt leading to market
disruption or a lack of confidence in the markets ability
to process such defaults;
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
increased instances of counterparty failure or
bankruptcy; or
|
|
|
|
an increase in the inability of CDS protection sellers to pay
out contractual obligations upon the occurrence of a credit
event.
|
A reduction in our overall trading volume could also render our
markets less attractive to market participants as a source of
liquidity and could result in further loss of trading volume and
associated transaction-based revenues. Accordingly, any
reduction in trading volumes or market liquidity could have a
material adverse affect on our business and financial results.
Further, our clearing houses maintain funds with various banks
and if one or more of these banks fail, our clearing houses may
be at risk to cover the amounts that were on deposit with the
failed bank. The amounts that our clearing houses have on
deposit with third party banks at any time may be substantial
and there is no assurance that the clearing houses will be able
to recover the full amount of such deposits or that, in
circumstances where clearing houses have not recovered the full
amount of such deposits, they will be able to cover the amounts
required to settle transactions and continue their operations.
The default of a bank that holds deposits from our clearing
houses could cause our customers to lose confidence in our
markets and the ability of our clearing houses to continue to
act as central counterparties, which would have a material
adverse affect on our trading markets and our business as a
whole.
Our
business is primarily transaction-based, and declines in trading
volumes and market liquidity for any reason would adversely
affect our business and profitability.
We earn transaction fees for transactions executed and cleared
in our markets and from the provision of electronic trade
confirmation services. We derived 85.3%, 85.4% and 87.2% of our
consolidated revenues for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, from our transaction-based
business.
The success of our business depends on our ability to maintain
and increase our trading volumes and the resulting transaction
fees. Any decline in our trading volumes in the short-term or
long-term for any reason will negatively impact our transaction
fees and, therefore, our revenues. Accordingly, the occurrence
of any event that reduces the amount of transaction fees we
receive, which may result from declines in trading volumes or
market liquidity, reductions in commission rates, regulatory
changes, rebates to customers, competition or otherwise, would
have a significant impact on our operating results and
profitability.
Our
business depends in large part on volatility in commodity prices
generally and energy markets in particular.
Participants in the markets for energy, soft agricultural and
agricultural commodities trading pursue a range of trading
strategies. While some participants trade in order to satisfy
physical consumption needs, others seek to hedge contractual
price risk or take speculative or arbitrage positions, seeking
returns from price movements in different markets. Trading
volume is driven primarily by the degree of
volatility the magnitude and frequency of
fluctuations in prices of commodities. Volatility
increases the need to hedge contractual price risk and creates
opportunities for speculative or arbitrage trading. Commodities
markets historically have experienced significant price
volatility and in recent years reached record levels. We cannot
predict whether this pattern will continue, or for how long, or
if this trend will reverse itself. Were there to be a sustained
period of stability in the prices of commodities, we could
experience lower trading volumes, slower growth or even declines
in revenues.
Factors that are particularly likely to affect price volatility
and price levels, and thus trading volumes, include:
|
|
|
|
|
economic, political and market conditions in the United States,
Europe, the Middle East and elsewhere in the world;
|
|
|
|
weather conditions, including hurricanes and other significant
weather events, that impact the production of commodities, and,
in the case of energy commodities, production, refining and
distribution facilities for oil and natural gas;
|
|
|
|
the volatility in production volume of the commodities
underlying our energy, soft agricultural and agricultural
products and markets;
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
war and acts of terrorism;
|
|
|
|
legislative and regulatory changes;
|
|
|
|
credit quality of market participants;
|
|
|
|
the availability of capital;
|
|
|
|
broad trends in industry and finance, including the
consolidation in our industry;
|
|
|
|
the level and volatility of interest rates;
|
|
|
|
fluctuating exchange rates and currency values; and
|
|
|
|
concerns over inflation.
|
Any one or more of these factors may reduce price volatility or
price levels in the markets for derivatives trading generally
and for commodity products in particular. Any reduction in price
volatility or price levels could reduce trading activity in
those markets, including in our markets. Moreover, any reduction
in trading activity could reduce liquidity the
ability to find ready buyers and sellers at current
prices which in turn could further discourage
existing and potential market participants and thus accelerate
any decline in the level of trading activity in these markets.
In these circumstances, the markets with the highest trading
volumes, and therefore the most liquidity, would likely have a
growing competitive advantage over other markets. This could put
us at a greater disadvantage relative to our principal
competitor and other competitors, whose markets are larger and
more established than ours.
We cannot predict whether or when these unfavorable conditions
may arise in the future or, if they occur, how long or severely
they will affect trading volumes. A significant decline in our
trading volumes due to reduced volatility, lower prices or any
other factor, could have a material adverse effect on our
revenues since our transaction fees would decline and on our
profitability since our revenues would decline faster than our
expenses, some of which are fixed. Moreover, if these
unfavorable conditions were to persist over a lengthy period of
time and trading volumes were to decline substantially and for a
long enough period, the liquidity of our markets, and the
critical mass of transaction volume necessary to support viable
markets, could be jeopardized.
Our
revenues depend heavily upon trading volume in the markets for
ICE Brent Crude, ICE WTI Crude and ICE Gas Oil futures
contracts; OTC North American natural gas and power contracts;
sugar futures and options on sugar futures contracts; Russell
Index futures and options on Russell Indexes; and Creditex
brokerage transactions. A decline in volume or in our market
share in these contracts would jeopardize our ability to remain
profitable and grow.
Our revenues currently depend heavily on trading volume in the
markets for ICE Brent Crude futures contracts, ICE WTI Crude
futures contracts, ICE Gas Oil futures contracts, sugar futures
and options on sugar futures contracts, OTC North American
natural gas contracts, OTC North American power contracts,
Russell Index futures and options on the Russell Indexes
contracts, and Creditex brokerage transactions. Trading in these
contracts in the aggregate has represented 76.2% of our
consolidated revenues for the fourth quarter of 2008 and 73.9%
for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Our trading volume or market share in these markets may decline
due to a number of factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
development of competing contracts, and competition generally;
|
|
|
|
reliance on technology to conduct trading;
|
|
|
|
the relative stability of commodity prices;
|
|
|
|
reduced growth in mature commodity markets;
|
|
|
|
increased availability of electronic trading on competing
contracts;
|
|
|
|
possible regulatory changes; and
|
|
|
|
adverse publicity and government investigations.
|
A decline in trading volume would have a negative impact on our
operating results and profitability.
36
A
decline in the production of commodities traded in our markets
could reduce our liquidity and adversely affect our revenues and
profitability.
We derived 84.4%, 84.3% and 86.1% of our consolidated revenues
for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, from exchange, commission and clearing fees
generated from trading in commodity products in our futures and
OTC markets. The volume of contracts traded in the futures and
OTC markets for any specific commodity tends to be a multiple of
the physical production of that commodity. If the physical
supply or production of any commodity declines, market
participants could become less willing to trade in contracts
based on that commodity. For example, the ICE Brent Crude
futures contract has been subject to this risk as production of
Brent crude oil peaked in 1984 and began steadily falling in
subsequent years. We, in consultation with market participants,
altered the mechanism for settlement of ICE Brent Crude futures
contract to a mechanism based on the Brent/Forties/Oseberg North
Sea oil fields, known as the BFO Index, to ensure that the
commodity prices on which its settlement price is based reflect
a large enough pool of traders and trading activity so as to be
less susceptible to manipulation. Market participants that trade
in ICE Brent Crude futures may determine in the future, however,
that additional underlying commodity products need to be
considered in the settlement of that contract or that the
settlement mechanism is not credible.
For example, exchange fees earned from trading in the ICE Brent
Crude futures contract accounted for 46.6%, 47.6% and 50.5% of
our total revenues from our energy futures business, net of
intersegment fees, for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006, respectively, or 11.4%, 15.2% and 20.4% of our
consolidated revenues for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Any uncertainty concerning
the settlement of the ICE Brent Crude futures contract, or a
decline in the physical supply or production of any other
commodity on which our trading products are based, could result
in a decline in trading volumes in our markets, adversely
affecting our revenues and profitability.
We
intend to explore acquisition opportunities and strategic
alliances relating to other businesses, products or
technologies. We may not be successful in identifying
opportunities or integrating other businesses, products or
technologies successfully with our business. Any such
transaction also may not produce the results we
anticipate.
We intend to continue to explore and pursue acquisition and
other opportunities to strengthen our business and grow our
company. We may enter into business combination transactions,
make acquisitions or enter into strategic partnerships, joint
ventures or alliances, any of which may be material. We may
enter into these transactions to acquire other businesses,
products or technologies to expand our products and services,
advance our technology or take advantage of new developments and
potential changes in the industry.
The market for acquisition targets and strategic alliances is
highly competitive, particularly in light of increasing
consolidation in the exchange sector. As a result, we may be
unable to identify strategic opportunities or we may be unable
to negotiate or finance any future acquisition successfully.
Further, our competitors could merge, making it more difficult
for us to find appropriate entities to acquire or merge with and
making it more difficult to compete in our industry due to the
increased resources of our merged competitors. If we are
required to raise capital by incurring additional debt or
issuing additional equity for any reason in connection with a
strategic acquisition or investment, we cannot assure that any
such financing will be available or that the terms of such
financing will be favorable to us.
The process of integration may produce unforeseen regulatory and
operating difficulties and expenditures and may divert the
attention of management from the ongoing operation of our
business. Further, as a result of any future acquisition, we may
issue additional shares of our common stock that dilute
shareholders ownership interest in us, expend cash, incur
debt, assume contingent liabilities or create additional
expenses related to amortizing intangible assets with estimable
useful lives, any of which could harm our business, financial
condition or results of operations and negatively impact our
stock price.
37
We may
fail to realize the anticipated cost savings, growth
opportunities and synergies and other benefits anticipated from
our mergers and acquisitions or investments, which could
adversely affect the value of our common stock.
We completed multiple acquisitions and strategic investments in
2007 and 2008, including transactions with NYBOT (ICE Futures
U.S.), Winnipeg Commodity Exchange, Inc. (ICE Futures Canada),
Chatham Energy Partners, LLC, ChemConnect Inc., Commoditrack,
Inc, National Commodity Derivatives Exchange Limited (NCDEX),
YellowJacket Software, Inc. and Creditex Group, Inc. The success
of our mergers and acquisitions will depend, in part, on our
ability to realize the anticipated synergies and growth
opportunities from combining the businesses, as well as our
expected cost savings and revenue growth trends. In general, we
expect to benefit from operational synergies resulting from the
consolidation of capabilities and elimination of redundancies in
our mergers and acquisitions.
Integration of companies acquired by us is complex and time
consuming, and requires substantial resources and effort. We
must successfully combine the businesses in a manner that
permits the expected cost savings and synergies to be realized.
In addition, we must achieve the anticipated savings and
synergies without adversely affecting current revenues and our
investments in future growth. The integration process and other
disruptions resulting from the mergers or acquisitions may also
disrupt each companys ongoing businesses or cause
inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies
that adversely affect our relationships with market
participants, employees, regulators and others with whom we have
business or other dealings or our ability to achieve the
anticipated benefits of the merger or acquisition. When we
expand our product offering through a merger or acquisition, we
may need to introduce our trading platform to customers that
have historically conducted business by telephone or on a
different exchange. The process of transitioning customers to
our electronic platform can be time consuming and expensive and
if not ultimately accepted, could substantially impair or render
worthless the assets we acquired through the merger or
acquisition. In addition, difficulties in integrating the
businesses or any negative impact on the regulatory functions of
any of our companies could harm the reputation of the companies.
We may not successfully achieve the integration objectives, and
we may not realize the anticipated cost savings, revenue growth
and synergies in full or at all, or it may take longer to
realize them than expected.
In addition, we may not realize anticipated growth opportunities
and other benefits from strategic investments we have made and
may make in the future for a number of reasons, including
regulatory or government approvals or changes and, in some
instances, our lack of or limited control over the management
business, such as NCDEX. If we fail to successfully integrate an
acquired business, or if the reason we acquired or invested in a
business is materially impacted, we may be required to take an
impairment charge on our financial statements, which could
negatively impact our stock price.
Our
cost structure is largely fixed. If our revenues decline and we
are unable to reduce our costs, or if our expenses increase
without a corresponding increase in revenues, our profitability
will be adversely affected.
Our cost structure is largely fixed and we expect that it will
continue to be largely fixed in the foreseeable future. We base
our expectations of our cost structure on historical and
expected levels of demand for our products and services as well
as our fixed operating infrastructure, such as computer hardware
and software, leases, hosting facilities and security and
staffing levels. If demand for our current products and services
declines, our revenues will decline. If demand for future
products that we acquire or license is not to the level
necessary to offset the cost of the acquisition or license, our
net income would decline. For example, we have incurred
significant costs to secure the exclusive license with the
Russell Investment Group for listing Russells index
futures, the costs of which will be amortized over the next
several years. If our clearing and execution fees for the
Russell index futures is not sufficient to offset the
amortization costs, our net income will decrease. We may not be
able to adjust our cost structure, at all or on a timely basis,
to counteract a decrease in revenue or net income, which would
result in an adverse impact on our profitability.
38
Owning
clearing houses exposes us to risks, including the risk of
defaults by our participants clearing trades through our
clearing houses, risks regarding investing the funds in the
guaranty fund and held as security for original margin, and
risks related to the cost of operating the clearing
houses.
Operating clearing houses requires material ongoing expenditures
and exposes us to various risks. We cannot assure you that our
clearing arrangements will be satisfactory to our participants
or will not require additional substantial system modifications
to accommodate them in the future. Our operation of clearing
houses may not be as successful and may not provide us the
benefits we anticipate. In addition, our operation of these
clearing houses may not generate sufficient revenues to cover
the expenses we incur.
There are risks inherent in operating a clearing house,
including exposure to the market and counterparty risk of
clearing members, defaults by clearing members and providing a
return to the clearing members on the funds invested by the
clearing houses, which could subject our business to substantial
losses. For example, clearing members have placed an aggregate
of cash in ICE Clear Europe relating to margin requirements and
funding the guaranty fund that exceeded $10 billion as of
December 31, 2008. These funds are swept and invested daily
by JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. in accordance with our clearing
house investment guidelines. ICE Clear Europe has an obligation
to return margin payments and guaranty fund contributions to
clearing members once the relevant clearing members
exposure to the clearing house no longer exists, and further to
provide an interest yield to clearing members in respect of
margin and guaranty fund contributions lodged with the clearing
house. If the investment principal amount decreases in value,
ICE Clear Europe will be liable for the shortfall.
Although our clearing houses have policies and procedures to
help ensure that clearing members can satisfy their obligations,
such policies and procedures may not succeed in preventing
losses after a counterpartys default. We also have in
place or plan to establish, as appropriate, various measures
intended to enable our clearing houses to cover any default and
maintain liquidity, such as deposits in a guaranty fund.
However, we cannot assure you that these measures and safeguards
will be sufficient to protect us from a default or that we will
not be materially and adversely affected in the event of a
significant default. Additionally, the default of any one of the
clearing members could subject our business to substantial
losses and cause our customers to lose confidence in the
guarantee of our clearing houses.
The
derivatives and energy commodities trading industry has been and
continues to be subject to increased legislative and regulatory
scrutiny, and we face the risk of changes to our regulatory
environment in the future, which may diminish trading volumes on
our electronic platform.
Providing facilities to trade financial derivatives and energy
products is one of our core businesses. In 2008, given the high
price of energy, crude oil and other commodities, the
U.S. Congress held numerous hearings regarding the proper
regulation of energy trading and, in particular, the potential
impact of speculation on energy prices. In addition, the
U.K.s Treasury Select Committee has also held a hearing on
this issue. In addition, hearings were held on the role that
financial derivatives may have played in the broader financial
market crisis. There are currently legislative proposals
outstanding, and additional bills may be introduced in the
future, that target futures and OTC market participants. In the
U.S. Congress, legislative proposals have recently been
introduced that would (1) eliminate the OTC bilateral
market by forcing OTC trades to be cleared;
and/or
(2) eliminate derivatives trading except for trading on
futures exchanges. Finally, we anticipate that the
U.S. Congress and the President will propose major changes
to the financial regulatory system. These changes could include
merging the CFTC and SEC, a merger of financial regulators into
a super regulator similar to the UKs Financial
Service Authority, or the creation of new regulatory body or
bodies that would regulate by activity, not product.
Further, the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 has
given the Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, additional authority
to investigate and prosecute manipulation in the petroleum
markets. In August 2008, the FTC released a proposed rule
stating that it would exercise its authority in the petroleum
futures markets, which would include participants on ICE Futures
Europe and our OTC markets. The standard of proof relating to
manipulation proposed by the FTC is less stringent than the
standard currently used by the CFTC and could deter participants
from our markets.
39
We currently operate our OTC markets as an exempt
commercial market under the Commodity Exchange Act. As
such, our markets are subject to anti-fraud, anti-manipulation,
access, reporting and record-keeping requirements of the CFTC.
However, unlike a futures exchange, we are not a self regulatory
organization that undertakes regulatory oversight of OTC
trading. In May 2008, Congress passed legislation as part of the
Farm Bill to increase regulation of OTC markets. The new
legislation requires and grants authority to OTC electronic
trading facilities to assume self regulatory responsibilities,
such as market monitoring and establishing position limits or
accountability levels, over contracts that serve a significant
price discovery function. This legislation requires us and our
OTC participants to operate under heightened regulatory burdens
and incur additional costs, including recordkeeping and
reporting costs, to comply with the additional regulations, and
could deter some participants from trading on our OTC platform.
In December 2008, the CFTC proposed rules to implement the Farm
Bill. In addition to requirements outlined by the Farm Bill, the
proposed rules would require the exempt commercial market to
impose limits on bilateral trades executed on our platform. This
could provide an incentive for market participants to execute
these transactions off exchange. Our OTC Henry Hub natural gas
contract, which comprised 75.2%, 73.4%, and 81.6% of our OTC
energy transaction volumes and 24.9%, 21.4%, and 30.1% of our
consolidated revenues in the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively, would be
considered a significant price discovery contract.
It is possible that the CFTC will deem additional OTC contracts
traded in our markets to be significant price discovery
contracts. One bill currently pending in the
U.S. Congress could, if enacted, subject our OTC markets to
a level of regulation identical or comparable to that of
regulated exchanges.
Further, allegations of manipulative trading by market
participants or the failure of industry participants could
subject us, our markets or our industry to regulatory scrutiny,
possible fines or restrictions, as well as significant legal
expenses and adverse publicity. These changes, if enacted, and
increased regulation regarding commodity prices, market
participants or the OTC and futures markets generally could
materially adversely affect our business by limiting the amount
of trading that is conducted in our markets.
We are
currently subject to regulation in multiple jurisdictions.
Failure to comply with existing regulatory requirements, and
possible future changes in these requirements or in the current
interpretation of these requirements, could adversely affect our
business.
ICE Futures Europe, through which we conduct our energy futures
business, operates as a Recognized Investment Exchange in the
United Kingdom. As a Recognized Investment Exchange, ICE Futures
Europe has regulatory responsibility in its own right and is
subject to supervision by the FSA pursuant to the FSMA. ICE
Futures Europe is required under the FSMA to maintain sufficient
financial resources, adequate systems and controls and effective
arrangements for monitoring and disciplining its members.
Likewise, ICE Futures U.S. operates as a Designated
Contract Market. As a self-regulatory organization, it is
responsible for ensuring that the exchange operates in
accordance with existing rules and regulations, and must comply
with eighteen core principles under the Commodity Exchange Act.
The ability of ICE Futures Europe and ICE Futures U.S. to
comply with all applicable laws and rules is largely dependent
on its maintenance of compliance, surveillance, audit and
reporting systems. We cannot assure you that these systems and
procedures are fully effective. Failure to comply with current
regulatory requirements and regulatory requirements that may be
imposed on us in the future could subject us to significant
penalties, including termination of our ability to conduct our
regulated energy futures business through ICE Futures Europe and
our regulated soft commodities business through ICE Futures U.S.
Electronic trading in our energy futures contracts on ICE
Futures Europe is permitted in many jurisdictions around the
world, including in the United States, through no
action relief from the local jurisdictions
regulator. In the United States, direct electronic access to
trading in ICE Futures Europe products is offered to
U.S. persons based on a series of no action letters from
the CFTC that permit
non-U.S. exchanges,
referred to as foreign boards of trade, to provide
U.S. persons with electronic access to their markets
without registration with the CFTC as a U.S. regulated
exchange. Our ability to offer our current and new futures
products under our existing no action relief could be impacted
by any actions taken by the CFTC as a result of additional
conditions being imposed on ICE Futures Europe under its no
action relief. In addition, certain of the bills pending before
the U.S. Congress would, if enacted, either eliminate the
no action relief granted to
40
ICE Futures Europe and other
non-U.S. exchanges,
or impose additional regulatory and reporting requirements as a
condition for the continuation of such relief. One bill has been
proposed in the U.S. Congress that could require ICE
Futures Europe to place lower position limits on energy
contracts linked to settlement prices of a U.S. designated
contract market than the U.S. designated contract market
itself imposes. If our offering of products through ICE Futures
Europe to U.S. participants is subject to additional
regulatory constraints, our business could be adversely affected.
Similarly, electronic trading in ICE Futures U.S. contracts
is permitted in many jurisdictions through no action
relief from the local jurisdictions regulatory
requirements. With the end of open outcry trading of ICE Futures
U.S. agricultural futures contracts in February 2008, the
ability of ICE Futures U.S. to offer trading in these
futures products in multiple jurisdictions will be dependent
upon its ability to comply with the existing conditions of its
no action relief in various jurisdictions and any new conditions
that may be added.
New legislation, regulations or enforcement may require us to
allocate more resources to regulatory compliance and oversight
and may diminish confidence in our markets, which would
adversely affect our business. Current legislative and
regulatory requirements and new initiatives, either in the
United States, the United Kingdom or elsewhere, could affect one
or more of the following aspects of our business or impose one
or more of the following requirements:
|
|
|
|
|
the manner in which we communicate with and contract with our
participants;
|
|
|
|
a requirement that we impose additional position limits or
position accountability limits on our participants;
|
|
|
|
prohibitions against certain categories of participants (e.g.,
pension funds) from accessing our markets;
|
|
|
|
the demand for and pricing of our products and services;
|
|
|
|
the tax treatment of trading in our products;
|
|
|
|
a requirement that we maintain minimum regulatory capital on
hand;
|
|
|
|
a requirement that we exercise regulatory oversight of our OTC
participants, and assume responsibility for their conduct;
|
|
|
|
a requirement that we make additional reports to regulatory
authorities regarding the trading activities of our
participants, which would impact our financial and regulatory
reporting practices;
|
|
|
|
our record-keeping and record-retention procedures;
|
|
|
|
the nature and role of our self-regulatory responsibilities may
change;
|
|
|
|
our ability to launch new products or contracts since we may
need to satisfy certain regulatory obligations prior to
launching such new products or contracts.
|
|
|
|
the licensing of our employees; and
|
|
|
|
the conduct of our directors, officers, employees and affiliates.
|
The implementation of new legislation or regulations, or changes
in or unfavorable interpretations of existing regulations by
courts or regulatory bodies, could require us to incur
significant compliance costs and impede our ability to operate,
expand and enhance our electronic platform as necessary to
remain competitive and grow our business. Regulatory changes
inside or outside the United States or the United Kingdom could
materially and adversely affect our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
Legislative
or regulatory changes regarding the operation of clearing
facilities or preventing them from being owned or controlled by
exchanges may prevent us from realizing the economic benefits of
operating our clearing house.
Many clearing firms have emphasized the importance to them of
centralizing clearing of futures contracts and options on
futures contracts to maximize the efficient use of their
capital, exercise greater control over their
41
value at risk and extract greater operating leverage from
clearing activities. Many clearing firms have expressed the view
that clearing firms should have a choice of where to clear their
transactions or should control the governance of clearing
houses. In addition, some clearing firms have expressed the view
that multiple clearing houses should be consolidated and
operated as utilities rather than as for-profit enterprises.
Some clearing firms, along with the Futures Industry Association
and U.K. Futures and Options Associations, have attempted to
cause legislative or regulatory changes to be adopted that would
allow market participants to transfer positions from an
exchange-owned clearing house (such as ICE Clear Europe) to a to
a non-exchange owned clearinghouse model. Some market
participants, including the U.K. Futures and Options
Association, have expressed support for extending the European
Union Code of Clearing and Conduct to derivatives, which would
mandate clearing choices for customers through interoperability.
In addition, the U.S. Department of Justice released
comments on February 7, 2008 requesting the
U.S. Department of Treasury to review futures markets to
determine if a different regime for clearing is feasible, which
could include ending exchange control of financial futures
clearing to foster exchange competition. The Department of
Justice comments specifically excluded markets for commodity
futures, such as energy and agricultural futures markets. In
addition, several Members of the U.S. Congress have
advocated for higher margins on futures products, which could
change the way we collect margin or operate the risk management
functions of our clearing houses. If these legislative or
regulatory changes are adopted, alternative clearing houses may
seek to clear positions established on our exchanges. Even if
they are not successful in their efforts, the factors described
above may cause clearing firms to limit the use of our clearing
houses. Finally, legislation has been proposed mandating that
all derivatives be cleared by a clearing house, including
transactions executed prior to the legislations passage.
If clearing houses are compelled to take these trades, it could
present a financial risk to the clearing houses we operate. If
any of these events occur, our revenues and profits would be
materially and adversely affected.
If we
are unable to keep up with rapid changes in technology and
participant preferences, we may not be able to compete
effectively.
To remain competitive, we must continue to enhance and improve
the responsiveness, functionality, accessibility and reliability
of our electronic platform and our proprietary technology. The
financial services industry is characterized by rapid
technological change, change in use patterns, change in client
preferences, frequent product and service introductions and the
emergence of new industry standards and practices. These changes
could render our existing proprietary technology uncompetitive
or obsolete. Our ability to pursue our strategic objectives,
including increasing trading volumes on our trading platforms,
as well as our ability to continue to grow our business, will
depend, in part, on our ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
enhance our existing services and maintain and improve the
functionality and reliability of our electronic platform, in
particular, reducing network downtime or disruptions;
|
|
|
|
develop or license new technologies that address the
increasingly sophisticated and varied needs of our participants;
|
|
|
|
anticipate and respond to technological advances and emerging
industry practices on a cost-effective and timely basis; and
|
|
|
|
continue to attract and retain highly skilled technology staff
to maintain and develop our existing technology and to adapt to
and manage emerging technologies while attempting to keep our
employee headcount low.
|
We cannot assure you that we will successfully implement new
technologies or adapt our proprietary technology to our
participants requirements or emerging industry standards
in a timely and cost-effective manner. Any failure to remain
abreast of industry standards in technology and to be responsive
to participant preferences could cause our market share to
decline and negatively impact our profitability.
Our
business may be harmed by computer and communications systems
failures and delays.
We support and maintain many of the systems that comprise our
electronic platform. Our failure to monitor or maintain these
systems, or to find replacements for defective components within
a system in a
42
timely and cost-effective manner when necessary, could have a
material adverse effect on our ability to conduct our business.
Although we fully replicate our primary data center, our
redundant systems or disaster recovery plans may prove to be
inadequate. Our systems, or those of our third party providers,
may fail or be shutdown or, due to capacity constraints, may
operate slowly, causing one or more of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
unanticipated disruption in service to our participants;
|
|
|
|
slower response time and delays in our participants trade
execution and processing;
|
|
|
|
failed settlement by participants to whom we provide trade
confirmation or clearing services;
|
|
|
|
incomplete or inaccurate accounting, recording or processing of
trades;
|
|
|
|
our distribution of inaccurate or untimely market data to
participants who rely on this data in their trading
activity; and
|
|
|
|
financial loss.
|
We could experience system failures due to power or
telecommunications failures, human error on our part or on the
part of our vendors or participants, natural disasters, fire,
sabotage, hardware or software malfunctions or defects, computer
viruses, intentional acts of vandalism or terrorism and similar
events. In these instances, our disaster recovery plan may prove
ineffective. If any one or more of these situations were to
arise, they could result in damage to our business reputation,
participant dissatisfaction with our electronic platform,
prompting participants to trade elsewhere, or exposure to
litigation or regulatory sanctions. As a consequence, our
business, financial condition and results of operations could
suffer materially.
Our regulated business operations generally require that our
trade execution and communications systems be able to handle
anticipated present and future peak trading volume. Heavy use of
computer systems during peak trading times or at times of
unusual market volatility could cause those systems to operate
slowly or even to fail for periods of time. However, we cannot
assure you that our estimates of future trading volume will be
accurate or that our systems will always be able to accommodate
actual trading volume without failure or degradation of
performance.
Our
systems and those of our third party service providers may be
vulnerable to security risks, which could result in wrongful use
of our information, or which could make our participants
reluctant to use our electronic platform.
We regard the secure transmission of confidential information on
our electronic platform as a critical element of our operations.
Our networks and those of our participants and our third party
service providers, may, however, be vulnerable to unauthorized
access, computer viruses, firewall or encryption failures and
other security problems. We may be required to expend
significant resources to protect our business and our
participants against the threat of security breaches or to
alleviate problems caused by security breaches. Although we
intend to continue to implement industry standard security
measures, we cannot assure you that those measures will be
sufficient to protect our business against losses or any reduced
trading volume incurred in our markets as a result of any
significant security breaches on our platform.
Our
operating results may be subject to significant fluctuations due
to a number of factors.
A number of factors beyond our control may contribute to
substantial fluctuations in our operating results. As a result
of the factors described in the preceding risk factors, you will
not be able to rely on our historical operating results in any
particular period as an indication of our future performance.
The commodities trading industry, and energy commodities trading
in particular, has historically been subject to variability in
trading volumes due primarily to several key factors. These
factors include:
|
|
|
|
|
geopolitical events;
|
|
|
|
weather;
|
|
|
|
real and perceived supply and demand imbalances in the
underlying commodities;
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
regulatory considerations;
|
|
|
|
the availability of capital;
|
|
|
|
the number of trading days in a quarter; and
|
|
|
|
seasonality.
|
As a result of one or more of these factors, trading volumes in
our markets could decline, possibly significantly, which would
adversely affect our revenues derived from transaction fees. If
we fail to meet securities analysts expectations regarding
our operating performance, the price of our common stock could
decline substantially.
Fluctuations
in currency exchange rates may adversely affect our operating
results.
The revenues, expenses and financial results of ICE Futures
Europe and the other U.K. subsidiaries have historically been
denominated in pounds sterling, which previously was the
functional currency of our U.K. subsidiaries. We had foreign
currency translation risk equal to our net investment in our
U.K. subsidiaries. The financial statements of our U.K.
subsidiaries were translated into U.S. dollars using
current rates of exchange, with gains or losses included in the
cumulative translation adjustment account, a component of
shareholders equity. Effective as of July 1, 2006,
the functional currency of the majority of our U.K. subsidiaries
became the U.S. dollar. The functional currency of an
entity is the currency of the primary economic environment in
which the entity operates. The functional currency switched
based on various economic factors and circumstances, including
the fact that beginning in the second quarter of 2006, ICE
Futures Europe began to charge and collect exchange fees in
U.S. dollars rather than pounds sterling in its key futures
contracts, including crude oil and heating oil contracts. We
will no longer recognize any translation adjustments in the
consolidated financial statements subsequent to June 30,
2006 for those U.K. subsidiaries that have switched their
functional currency to the U.S. dollar.
In connection with our acquisition of ICE Futures Canada in
August 2007 and Creditex in August 2008, we have foreign
currency translation risk equal to our net investment in certain
Canadian and U.K. subsidiaries. The revenues, expenses and
financial results of these Canadian and U.K. subsidiaries are
denominated in Canadian dollars or pounds sterling, which are
the functional currencies of these subsidiaries. The financial
statements of these subsidiaries are translated into
U.S. dollars using a current rate of exchange, with gains
or losses included in the cumulative translation adjustment
account, a component of shareholders equity. As of
December 31, 2008, the portion of our shareholders
equity attributable to accumulated other comprehensive income
from foreign currency translation was $22.4 million. The
period-end foreign currency exchange rate for the Canadian
dollar to the U.S. dollar decreased from 1.0120 as of
December 31, 2007 to 0.8170 as of December 31, 2008
and the period-end foreign currency exchange rate for pounds
sterling to the U.S. dollar decreased from 1.9843 as of
December 31, 2007 to 1.4619 as of December 31, 2008.
We have foreign currency transaction risk related to the
settlement of foreign currency denominated assets, liabilities
and payables that occur through our foreign operations, which
are received in or paid in pounds sterling or euros, due to the
increase or decrease in the period-end foreign currency exchange
rates between periods. We had foreign currency transaction gains
(losses) of $3.1 million, $842,000 and ($288,000) for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively,
primarily attributable to the fluctuations of pounds sterling
and euros relative to the U.S. dollar. The average exchange
rate of pounds sterling to the U.S. dollar increased from
1.8434 for the year ended December 31, 2006 to 2.0020 for
the year ended December 31, 2007 and then decreased to
1.8545 for the year ended December 31, 2008.
We may experience substantial gains or losses from foreign
currency transactions in the future given that there are still
certain net assets or net liabilities and expenses of our
subsidiaries that are denominated in pounds sterling, euros and
Canadian dollars. Of our consolidated revenues, 3.3%, 1.2% and
7.2% were denominated in pounds sterling, euros or Canadian
dollars for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and
2006, respectively. Of our consolidated operating expenses,
20.2%, 15.9% and 29.8% were denominated in pounds sterling or
Canadian dollars for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006, respectively. As the pounds sterling, euros or
Canadian dollar exchange rate changes, the U.S. equivalent
of revenues and
44
expenses denominated in foreign currencies changes accordingly.
As of the second quarter of 2006, we began charging exchange
fees in U.S. dollars rather than in pounds sterling in our
key U.K. futures contracts, including crude oil and heating oil
contracts. Revenues in our businesses are denominated in
U.S. dollars, except with respect to a portion of the sales
through Creditex, all sales through ICE Futures Canada and a
small number of futures contracts at ICE Futures Europe. Our
U.K. operations in some instances function as a natural hedge
because we generally hold an equal amount of monetary assets and
liabilities that are denominated in pounds sterling.
While we may enter into hedging transactions in the future to
help mitigate our foreign exchange risk exposure, these hedging
arrangements may not be effective, particularly in the event of
imprecise forecasts of the levels of our
non-U.S. denominated
assets and liabilities. Accordingly, if there is an adverse
movement in exchange rates, we may suffer significant losses,
which would adversely affect our operating results and financial
condition.
Our
efforts to reduce risk in the credit derivatives market and to
create a derivative clearing house to act as a central
counterparty in the trading of CDS may not be
successful.
Credit derivative contracts are currently traded between two
market participants and are not cleared through a central
counterparty or clearing house. The buyer of the contract will
make a payment or series of payments to the seller in return for
protection against default or other credit event. The bilateral
nature of the market leaves participants exposed to counterparty
risk, which could result in systemic implications in times of
great financial distress. When financial counterparties cannot
rely on each others credit, and are unable to hedge their
own credit risk, they then stop lending to each other and the
credit markets may freeze. The recent collapse of two major
market participants and the continuing concern over the
financial health of other market participants has led regulators
and market participants to call for the creation of a central
clearinghouse for CDS.
Developing a market structure that brings transparency, capital
efficiency and mitigation of counterparty credit risk by
clearing credit defaults swaps transactions is an important
initiative for ICE and Creditex, as well as for certain of our
competitors. We have entered a preliminary nonbinding agreement
to develop a clearing house to act as a central counterparty in
registration and clearance of CDS instruments and we are forming
a limited purpose bank, ICE Trust, to act as the facility to
bring together the capabilities to clear credit default swaps on
a global basis. There is no guarantee that any dealers,
including those dealers that are parties to the nonbinding
agreement, will use our clearing solution. If our clearing
solution through ICE Trust is not successful or if one of our
competitors clearing solutions is more widely accepted
than our solution or is mandated by government intervention, we
may not be able to offset the additional operating cost against
our income and may be precluded from a valuable opportunity to
extend our participation in the CDS space.
Regulation
of the credit derivatives business is uncertain and such
uncertainty, or future regulatory changes, could reduce trading
in the credit derivatives market.
The current regulatory environment for continued trading of CDS
and clearing CDS is unclear and Congress may choose to enact
additional financial market reforms in the coming months to
broaden the purview of credit derivatives regulation. Currently,
one bill is pending that would give jurisdiction over credit
default swaps to the SEC and another pending bill would give
jurisdiction to the CFTC. In addition, another bill has been
proposed to ban market participants from engaging in a CDS
transaction unless the participant owns the underlying bond. At
this time, it is unclear whether any requirements or limitations
will be adopted with respect to CDS transactions or, if so, what
the scope or content will be. While we plan to work with all
regulatory bodies to develop an appropriate solution to ensure
that these markets are properly regulated, we do not know the
form such regulation will take. More stringent regulation,
including regulatory bans on trading, could negatively impact
transaction volume in the CDS market, which would have a
negative impact on Creditexs business and, potentially,
our clearing initiative. Additionally, the implementation of new
regulatory requirements and processes to ensure continued
compliance with such regulations may require us to incur
significant compliance costs. Changes in existing regulations
and requirements may adversely affect the conduct of
Creditexs business and our plans to create a clearing
house for CDS transactions.
45
Owning
Creditexs business exposes us to additional risk and
Creditex is largely dependent on its
broker-dealer
clients. These clients are not restricted from transacting or
processing CDS directly, or through their own proprietary or
third-party platforms.
Creditexs business is primarily transaction based and it
provides brokerage services to clients primarily in the form of
agency transactions, although it also engages in a limited
number of matched principal transactions. In agency
transactions, customers pay transaction fees for trade execution
services in which Creditex connects buyers and sellers who
settle their transactions directly and for post-transactional
processing services carried out through Creditexs T-Zero
subsidiaries. In matched principal transactions (also known as
risk-less principal transactions), Creditex receives
transaction fees primarily from transactions in which Creditex
simultaneously agrees to buy instruments from one customer and
sell them to another customer. The amount of the fee generally
depends on the spread between the buy and sell price of the
security that is brokered. The majority of the Creditex
transactions are agency transactions and the matched principal
transactions accounted for less than 1% of the total
transactions for Creditex for the period from September 1,
2008 to December 31, 2008. Declines in trading volumes in
credit derivatives would adversely affect our revenues and
profitability. We also face the risk of not being able to
collect transaction or processing fees charged to customers for
Creditexs agency brokerage services and T-Zeros
processing services. With respect to matched principal
transactions, we run the risk that a counterparty to a matched
principal transaction may fail to fulfill its obligations, or
that Creditex may face liability for an unmatched trade.
Creditex relies to a large extent on its broker-dealer clients
to provide liquidity on its electronic trading platform and to
drive usage of the T-Zero trade processing platform. None of
these broker-dealer clients is contractually or otherwise
obligated to continue to use Creditexs electronic trading
or processing platforms. Creditexs agreements with
broker-dealers are generally not exclusive and broker-dealers
may terminate such agreements and enter into, and in some cases
have entered into, similar agreements with Creditexs
competitors. Additionally, many of Creditexs broker-dealer
clients are involved in other ventures, including other
electronic trading and processing platforms, as trading
participants or as equity holders, and such ventures or newly
created ventures may compete with Creditex now and in the future.
Any
infringement by us of intellectual property rights of others
could result in litigation and adversely affect our ability to
continue to provide, or increase the cost of providing, our
products and services.
Patents and other intellectual property rights are increasingly
important as further electronic components are added to trading,
and patents and other intellectual property rights of third
parties may have an important bearing on our ability to offer
certain of our products and services. Our competitors, as well
as other companies and individuals, may have obtained, and may
be expected to obtain in the future, patent rights related to
the types of products and services we offer or plan to offer. We
cannot assure you that we are or will be aware of all patents
that may pose a risk of infringement by our products and
services. In addition, some patent applications in the United
States are confidential until a patent is issued, and therefore
we cannot evaluate the extent to which our products and services
may be covered or asserted to be covered in pending patent
applications. Thus, we cannot be sure that our products and
services do not infringe on the rights of others or that others
will not make claims of infringement against us.
Further, our competitors may claim other intellectual property
rights over information that is used by us in our product
offerings. In addition, with respect to our intellectual
property, if one or more of our products or services is found to
infringe patents held by others, it may be required to stop
developing or marketing the products or services, obtain
licenses to develop and market the products or services from the
holders of the patents or redesign the products or services in
such a way as to avoid infringing the patents. We also could be
required to pay damages if we were found to infringe patents
held by others, which could materially adversely affect our
business, financial condition and operating results. We cannot
assess the extent to which we may be required in the future to
obtain licenses with respect to patents held by others, whether
such licenses would be available or, if available, whether it
would be able to obtain such licenses on commercially reasonable
terms. If we were unable to obtain such licenses, we may not be
able to redesign our products or services at a reasonable cost
to avoid infringement, which could materially adversely affect
our business, financial condition and operating results.
46
Some
of the proprietary technology we employ may be vulnerable to
infringement by others.
Our business is dependent on proprietary technology and other
intellectual property that we own or license from third parties.
Despite precautions we have taken or may take to protect our
intellectual property rights, third parties could copy or
otherwise obtain and use our proprietary technology without
authorization. It may be difficult for us to monitor
unauthorized use of our intellectual property. We cannot assure
you that the steps that we have taken will prevent
misappropriation of our proprietary technology or intellectual
property.
We have filed patent applications in the United States and in
other jurisdictions on a number of aspects of our electronic
trading system and trade confirmation systems. In addition, we
have licenses under two U.S. patents for trading energy,
and two joint U.S. patents with NYMEX covering an implied
market trading system. We have also filed patent applications on
certain aspects of our electronic trading and trade confirmation
systems in the European Patent Office and Canada. We cannot
assure you that we will obtain any final patents covering these
services, nor can we predict the scope of any patents issued. In
addition, we cannot assure you that any patent issued will be
effective to protect this intellectual property against
misappropriation. Third parties in Europe or elsewhere could
acquire patents covering this or other intellectual property for
which we obtain patents in the United States, or equivalent
intellectual property, as a result of differences in local laws
affecting patentability and patent validity. Third parties in
other jurisdictions might also misappropriate our intellectual
property rights with impunity if intellectual property
protection laws are not actively enforced in those
jurisdictions. Patent infringement
and/or the
grant of parallel patents would erode the value of our
intellectual property.
We have secured trademark registrations for
IntercontinentalExchange and ICE from
the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and from relevant
agencies in Europe, as appropriate, with ICE also
being registered in Singapore, as well as registrations for
other trademarks used in our business. We also have several
U.S. and foreign applications pending for other trademarks
used in our business. We cannot assure you that any of these
marks for which applications are pending will be registered.
In addition, we may have to resort to litigation to enforce our
intellectual property rights, protect our trade secrets, and
determine the validity and scope of the intellectual property
rights of others or defend ourselves from claims of
infringement. We may not receive an adequate remedy for any
infringement of our intellectual property rights, and we may
incur substantial costs and diversion of resources and the
attention of management as a result of litigation, even if we
prevail. As a result, we may choose not to enforce our infringed
intellectual property rights, depending on our strategic
evaluation and judgment regarding the best use of our resources,
the relative strength of our intellectual property portfolio and
the recourse available to us.
Reductions
in our exchange fee rates or commission rates resulting from
competitive pressures could lower our revenues and
profitability.
We may experience pressure on our exchange fee rates and
commission rates as a result of competition we face in our
futures and OTC markets. Some of our competitors offer a broader
range of products and services to a larger participant base, and
enjoy higher trading volumes, than we do. Consequently, our
competitors may be able and willing to offer commodity trading
services at lower commission rates than we currently offer or
may be able to offer. As a result of this pricing competition,
we could lose both market share and revenues. We believe that
any downward pressure on commission rates would likely continue
and intensify as we continue to develop our business and gain
recognition in our markets. A decline in commission rates could
lower our revenues, which would adversely affect our
profitability. In addition, our competitors may offer other
financial incentives such as rebates or payments in order to
induce trading in their markets, rather than in our markets.
We
rely on specialized management and employees, including
professionals in our clearing house and brokerage business, and
our business may be harmed if we fail to retain these
professionals or attract new ones.
Our future success depends, in part, upon the continued
contributions of our executive officers and key employees whom
we rely on for executing our business strategy and identifying
new strategic initiatives. Some
47
of these individuals have significant experience in the
commodities trading industry and financial services markets
generally, and possess extensive technology skills and a deep
understanding of how various businesses operate. Some of these
individuals work on our technology team or are involved with our
clearing house operations.
In addition, since many products and less liquid market segments
in the credit derivatives market are still predominantly
transacted by voice brokers, our Creditex subsidiary provides
voice-brokered execution services in addition to its electronic
execution platform. Many brokers have extensive institutional
knowledge of Creditexs services, products, markets and
client base and have long-standing relationships with particular
clients. Therefore, the hiring of such brokers by other firms
could place us at a competitive disadvantage. Because of intense
competition for specialized brokerage services, we face the risk
that competitors will hire Creditex employees. Creditex has been
a party to claims and litigation arising from the departure of
brokers and other personnel to competing firms, and relating to
new Creditex employee hires. We face the risk of such claims in
the future, and may incur substantial legal fees and expend
significant management resources in pursuing or defending such
claims.
Competition in our industry for persons with trading industry or
technology expertise is intense. If any of our specialized
management or other professionals were to leave, we cannot
assure you that we would be able to find appropriate
replacements for these key personnel in a timely manner.
Further, we may have to incur significant costs to replace key
employees who leave.
We
rely on third party providers and other suppliers for a number
of services that are important to our business. An interruption
or cessation of an important service or supply by any third
party could have a material adverse effect on our
business.
We depend on a number of suppliers, such as online service
providers, hosting service and software providers, data
processors, software and hardware vendors, banks, and telephone
companies, for elements of our trading, clearing and other
systems. Moreover, the general trend toward industry
consolidation may increase the risk that these services may not
be available to us in the future. We also rely on access to
certain data used in our business through licenses with third
parties and we rely on a large international telecommunications
company for the provision of hosting services. If these
companies were to discontinue providing services to us, we would
likely experience significant disruption to our business.
We cannot assure you that any of these providers will be able to
continue to provide these services in an efficient,
cost-effective manner or that they will be able to adequately
expand their services to meet our needs. We also cannot assure
you that any of these providers will not terminate our business
relationship with us for competitive reasons or otherwise. An
interruption in or the cessation of an important service or
supply by any third party and our inability to make alternative
arrangements in a timely manner, or at all, would result in lost
revenues and higher costs.
In addition, participants trading on our electronic platform may
access it through 37 ISVs, which represent a substantial portion
of the ISVs that serve the commodities markets. The loss of a
significant number of ISVs providing access could make our
platform less attractive to participants who prefer this form of
access.
We are
subject to significant litigation and liability
risks.
Many aspects of our business, and the businesses of our
participants, involve substantial risks of liability. These
risks include, among others, potential liability from disputes
over terms of a trade and the claim that a system failure or
delay caused monetary loss to a participant or that an
unauthorized trade occurred. For example, dissatisfied
participants that have traded on our electronic platform or
those on whose behalf such participants have traded, may make
claims regarding the quality of trade execution, or alleged
improperly confirmed or settled trades, abusive trading
practices, security and confidentiality breaches, mismanagement
or even fraud against us or our participants. In addition,
because of the ease and speed with which sizable trades can be
executed on our electronic platform, participants can lose
substantial amounts by inadvertently entering
48
trade orders or by entering them inaccurately. A large number of
significant error trades could result in participant
dissatisfaction and a decline in participant willingness to
trade in our electronic markets.
Our
compliance and risk management methods might not be effective
and may result in outcomes that could adversely affect our
financial condition and operating results.
Our ability to comply with applicable laws and rules is largely
dependent on our establishment and maintenance of compliance,
audit and reporting systems, as well as our ability to attract
and retain qualified compliance and other risk management
personnel. Our policies and procedures to identify, monitor and
manage risks may not be fully effective. Management of
operational, legal and regulatory risk requires, among other
things, policies and procedures to record properly and verify a
large number of transactions and events. We cannot assure you
that our policies and procedures will always be effective or
that we will always be successful in monitoring or evaluating
the risks to which we are or may be exposed.
In addition, our regulators have broad enforcement powers to
censure, fine, issue
cease-and-desist
orders or prohibit us from engaging in some of our businesses.
Our ability to comply with applicable laws and rules is largely
dependent on our establishment and maintenance of compliance,
audit and reporting systems, as well as our ability to attract
and retain qualified compliance and other risk management
personnel. We face the risk of significant intervention by
regulatory authorities, including extensive examination and
surveillance activity. In the case of non-compliance or alleged
non-compliance with applicable laws or regulations, we could be
subject to investigations and proceedings that may result in
substantial penalties or civil lawsuits, including by customers,
for damages which can be significant. Any of these outcomes
would adversely affect our reputation, financial condition and
operating results. In extreme cases, these outcomes could
adversely affect our ability to conduct our business.
|
|
ITEM 1(B).
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
None.
Our most valuable property is our technology and the
infrastructure underlying it. Our intellectual property is
described under the heading Technology in
Item 1 Business. In addition to our
intellectual property, our other primary assets include computer
equipment, software, internally developed software and real
property. We own an array of computers and related equipment.
The net book value of our computer equipment, software and
internally developed software was $61.4 million as of
December 31, 2008.
Our principal executive offices are located in Atlanta, Georgia.
We occupy 63,010 square feet of office space in Atlanta
under a lease that expires on June 30, 2014. We also lease
an aggregate of 193,330 square feet of office space in New
York, London, Chicago, Houston, Winnipeg, Calgary and Singapore.
Our largest physical presence outside of Atlanta is in New York,
New York, where we have leased 145,249 square feet of
office space, primarily relating to ICE Futures U.S.s
executive office and its principal trading floor that are
located at One North End Avenue, New York, New York. ICE Futures
U.S. leases this space from NYMEX under a lease that
expires on July 1, 2013, unless an option to renew for five
years is extended by NYMEX following the initial term. In
addition, ICE Futures U.S. leases space in lower Manhattan
to house its primary computer center, its new grading facility
and certain administrative offices. These leases expire on
June 30, 2014 or December 31, 2016. ICE Futures
U.S. also maintains a
back-up
facility, which contains a fully operational trading floor and a
lights-out 24 by 7 computer center, through leases of three
parcels of space in Long Island City for this facility, which
expires on December 31, 2013. Our second largest physical
presence outside of Atlanta is in London, England, where we have
leased 37,382 square feet of office space. The various
leases covering these spaces generally expire in 2015.
We believe that our facilities are adequate for our current
operations and that we will be able to obtain additional space
as and when it is needed.
49
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
We are involved in a number of legal proceedings (including the
one described below) concerning matters arising in connection
with the conduct of our business. We believe, based on currently
available information, that the results of such proceedings, in
the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition.
On April 6, 2007, the Supreme Court of the State of New
York, County of New York, granted ICE Futures U.S.s motion
to dismiss all claims brought against it in an action commenced
on December 8, 2006, by certain holders of non-equity
trading permits, or the Permit Holders, of ICE Futures
U.S. The plaintiffs alleged that, in violation of purported
contract rights
and/or
rights under New Yorks
Not-For-Profit
Corporation Law, ICE Futures U.S. had not allowed its
Permit Holders, including the plaintiffs, to vote on the merger
pursuant to which we acquired ICE Futures U.S., and had
improperly denied the Permit Holders a portion of the merger
consideration. Plaintiffs sought (i) to enjoin consummation
of the merger, (ii) declaratory relief regarding their past
and future rights as Permit Holders, and (iii) an award of
unspecified damages on claims for breach of fiduciary duty,
breach of contract, unjust enrichment, estoppel and fraud. In
addition to dismissing its claims, the court also denied the
plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction. On
February 4, 2008, the Permit Holders appealed the lower
courts ruling dismissing their complaint but did not
pursue an appeal of the lower courts denial of their
request for an order enjoining the merger. The appeal was denied
in its entirety by the appellate court in a decision issued on
June 24, 2008. On October 7, 2008, a motion by the
Permit Holders for leave to appeal to the New York Court of
Appeals was denied by the Appellate Division. Thereafter, a
motion by the Permit Holders for leave to appeal directly to the
New York Court of Appeals was denied on January 20, 2009 by
the Court of Appeals.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
There were no matters submitted to a vote of
IntercontinentalExchanges security holders during the
fourth quarter of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
|
|
ITEM 4(A).
|
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS OF INTERCONTINENTALEXCHANGE, INC.
|
Set forth below, in accordance with General
Instruction G(3) of
Form 10-K
and Instruction 3 to Item 401(b) of
Regulation S-K,
is information regarding our executive officers and certain
other key employees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Title
|
|
Jeffrey C. Sprecher
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|
Charles A. Vice
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer
|
Scott A. Hill
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President
|
David S. Goone
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Strategic Officer
|
Edwin D. Marcial
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
Chief Technology Officer and Senior Vice President
|
Johnathan H. Short
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
|
David J. Peniket
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer, ICE Futures Europe
|
Thomas W. Farley
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer, ICE Futures U.S.
|
Sunil Hirani
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer, Creditex
|
Jeffrey C. Sprecher. Mr. Sprecher has
served as our Chief Executive Officer and a director since our
inception and has served as our Chairman of the Board since
November 2002. As our Chief Executive Officer, he is responsible
for our strategic direction, operation, and financial
performance. Mr. Sprecher purchased Continental Power
Exchange, Inc., our predecessor company, in 1997. Prior to
joining Continental Power Exchange, Inc., Mr. Sprecher held
a number of positions, including President, over a fourteen-year
period with Western Power Group, Inc., a developer, owner and
operator of large central-station power plants. While with
Western Power, Mr. Sprecher was responsible for a number of
significant financings. Mr. Sprecher holds a
50
B.S. degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of
Wisconsin and an MBA from Pepperdine University.
Charles A. Vice. Mr. Vice has served as
our President since October 2005 and our Chief Operating Officer
since July 2001. As our President and Chief Operating Officer,
Mr. Vice is responsible for overseeing our operations,
including market development, customer support and business
development activities. He has over 15 years of experience
in applying information technology in the energy industry.
Mr. Vice joined Continental Power Exchange, Inc. as a
Marketing Director during its startup in 1994, and prior thereto
was a Principal with Energy Management Associates for five
years, providing consulting services to energy firms. From 1985
to 1988, he was a Systems Analyst with Electronic Data Systems.
Mr. Vice holds a Bachelors of Science degree in
Mechanical Engineering from the University of Alabama and an MBA
from Vanderbilt University.
Scott A. Hill. Mr. Hill has served as our
Chief Financial Officer since May 2007. As our Chief Financial
Officer, he is responsible for overseeing all aspects of our
finance and accounting functions, including treasury, tax, cash
management and investor relations. He is also responsible for
financial planning, audit, business development and human
resources. Prior to joining us, Mr. Hill spent
16 years as an international finance executive for IBM. He
oversaw IBMs worldwide financial forecasts and
measurements from 2006 through 2007, working alongside the CFO
of IBM and with all of the companys global business units.
Prior to that, Mr. Hill was Vice President and Controller
of IBMs Japan multi-billion dollar business operation from
2003 through 2005. Mr. Hill earned his BBA in Finance from
the University of Texas at Austin and his MBA from New York
University, where he was recognized as a Stern Scholar.
David S. Goone. Mr. Goone has served as
our Senior Vice President, Chief Strategic Officer since March
2001. He is responsible for the expansion of our product line,
including futures products and trading capabilities for our
electronic platform. Mr. Goone also leads our global sales
organization. Prior to joining us, Mr. Goone served as the
Managing Director, Product Development and Sales at the Chicago
Mercantile Exchange where he worked for nine years. From 1989
through 1992, Mr. Goone was Vice President at Indosuez Carr
Futures, where he developed institutional and corporate
business. Prior to joining Indosuez, Mr. Goone worked at
Chase Manhattan Bank, where he developed and managed their
exchange-traded foreign currency options operation at the
Chicago Mercantile Exchange. Mr. Goone holds a B.S. degree
in Accountancy from the University of Illinois at
Urbana-Champaign.
Edwin D. Marcial. Mr. Marcial has served
as our Chief Technology Officer since May 2000. He is
responsible for all systems development and our overall
technology strategy. He also oversees the software design and
development initiatives of our information technology
professionals in the areas of project management, architecture,
software development and quality assurance. Mr. Marcial
joined the software development team at Continental Power
Exchange, Inc. in 1996 and has 14 years of IT experience
building large-scale systems in the energy industry. Prior to
joining Continental Power Exchange, Inc., he led design and
development teams at Harris Corporation building software
systems for the companys energy controls division.
Mr. Marcial earned a B.S. degree in Computer Science from
the College of Engineering at the University of Florida.
Johnathan H. Short. Mr. Short has served
as our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate
Secretary since June 2004. In his role as General Counsel, he is
responsible for managing our legal and regulatory affairs. As
Corporate Secretary, he is also responsible for a variety of our
corporate governance matters. Prior to joining us,
Mr. Short was a partner at McKenna Long &
Aldridge LLP, a national law firm with approximately 350
attorneys. Mr. Short practiced in the corporate law group
of McKenna, Long & Aldridge (and its predecessor firm,
Long Aldridge & Norman LLP) from November 1994 until
he joined us in June 2004. From April 1991 until October 1994,
he practiced in the commercial litigation department of Long
Aldridge & Norman LLP. Mr. Short holds a J.D.
degree from the University of Florida, College of Law, and a
B.S. in Accounting from the University of Florida, Fisher School
of Accounting.
David J. Peniket. Mr. Peniket has served
as President, ICE Futures Europe, since October 2005 and Chief
Operating Officer, ICE Futures Europe, since January 2005.
Mr. Peniket is responsible for ICE Futures Europes
financial performance, technology and market operations, human
resources, business development
51
and regulation and risk management. Prior to assuming the role
of Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Peniket served as Director
of Finance of ICE Futures Europe since May 2000. Before joining
ICE Futures Europe in 1999, Mr. Peniket worked for seven
years at KPMG LLP, where he trained as an accountant and was a
consultant in its financial management practice.
Mr. Peniket was Research Assistant to John Cartwright MP
from 1988 to 1991. He holds a B.Sc. (Econ) degree in Economics
from the London School of Economics and Political Science and is
a Chartered Accountant.
Thomas W. Farley. Mr. Farley joined ICE
Futures U.S. in February 2007 as President and Chief
Operating Officer. Mr. Farley is also a member of the Board
of Directors of ICE Futures U.S. Prior to joining ICE
Futures U.S., from July 2006 to January 2007, Mr. Farley
was President of SunGard Kiodex, a risk management technology
provider to the commodity derivatives markets. From October 2000
to July 2006, Mr. Farley served as Kiodexs Chief
Financial Officer and he also served as Kiodexs Chief
Operating Officer from January 2003 to July 2006. Prior to
Kiodex, Mr. Farley held positions in investment banking and
private equity. Mr. Farley holds a Bachelor of Arts in
Political Science from Georgetown University.
Sunil Hirani. Mr. Hirani has served as
President and Chief Operating Officer of Creditex since
Creditexs acquisition in August 2008. Prior to that,
Mr. Hirani served as Chairman and CEO of Creditex Group
from 1999 to August 2008, in addition to being one of
Creditexs co-founders. Before founding Creditex Group,
Mr. Hirani worked from October 1996 to April 1999 at
Deutsche Bank and Bankers Trust from August 1994 to September
1996, where he was involved in numerous aspects of the OTC
derivatives business. Prior to that, he worked at Lockheed
Martin Corporation as a software engineer designing, developing
and implementing software and hardware systems for NASA in
Houston, Texas for the space program. Mr. Hirani holds a
B.S. in Computer Science from Washington University and a Master
of Business Administration from Northwestern University.
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Approximate
Number of Holders of Common Stock
At February 9, 2009, there were approximately 622 holders
of record of our common stock.
Dividends
We have paid no dividends on our common stock and we do not
anticipate paying any dividends on our common stock for the
foreseeable future. Any determination to pay dividends in the
future will be made at the discretion of our board of directors
and will depend upon our results of operations, financial
conditions, contractual restrictions, restrictions imposed by
applicable law or the SEC and other factors our board of
directors deems relevant.
52
Price
Range of Common Stock
Our common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the
ticker symbol ICE. Our common stock was initially
offered and sold to the public at a price of $26.00 per share
and has been publicly traded since November 16, 2005. Prior
to that date, there was no public market in our stock. On
February 10, 2009, our common stock traded at a high of
$67.01 per share and a low of $59.54 per share. The following
table sets forth the quarterly high and low sale prices for the
periods indicated for our common stock on the New York Stock
Exchange.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Market Price
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
167.00
|
|
|
$
|
108.15
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
162.47
|
|
|
$
|
120.56
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
174.15
|
|
|
$
|
117.25
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
194.92
|
|
|
$
|
151.76
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
193.87
|
|
|
$
|
110.25
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
167.28
|
|
|
$
|
113.99
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
116.39
|
|
|
$
|
61.00
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
92.98
|
|
|
$
|
49.69
|
|
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information about our common stock
that may be issued under our existing equity compensation plans
as of December 31, 2008, which consists of the 2000 Stock
Option Plan, 2003 Directors Plan, 2004 Restricted Stock
Plan, 2005 Equity Incentive Plan and Creditex 1999 Stock
Options/Stock Issuance Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for Future
|
|
|
|
Securities to be Issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance Under Equity
|
|
|
|
Upon Exercise of
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Compensation Plans
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
(Excluding Securities
|
|
|
|
and Rights
|
|
|
Outstanding Options
|
|
|
Reflected in Column (a))
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)
|
|
|
2,079,320
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
49.06
|
(1)
|
|
|
948,601
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders(2)
|
|
|
1,755,264
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
26.86
|
(2)
|
|
|
1,121,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
3,834,584
|
|
|
$
|
36.83
|
(1)(2)
|
|
|
2,069,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The 2000 Stock Option Plan was approved by our stockholders in
June 2000 and the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan was approved by our
stockholders in June 2005. Of the 2,079,320 securities to be
issued upon exercise of outstanding options and rights,
1,103,158 are options with a weighted average exercise price of
$49.06 and the remaining 976,162 securities are restricted stock
shares that do not have an exercise price. |
|
(2) |
|
This category includes the 2003 Directors Plan, the 2004
Restricted Stock Plan and the Creditex 1999 Stock Options/Stock
Issuance Plan. Of the 1,755,264 securities to be issued upon
exercise of outstanding options and rights, 1,360,257 are
options with a weighted average exercise price of $26.86 and the
remaining 395,007 securities are restricted stock shares that do
not have an exercise price. For more information concerning
these plans, see note 10 to our consolidated financial
statements and related notes that are included elsewhere in this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K. |
53
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
The following tables present our selected consolidated financial
data as of and for the dates and periods indicated. We derived
the selected consolidated financial data set forth below for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 and as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007 from our audited consolidated
financial statements, which are included elsewhere in this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
We derived the selected consolidated financial data set forth
below for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 and as
of December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 from our audited
consolidated financial statements, which are not included in
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The selected consolidated financial data presented below is not
indicative of our future results for any period. The selected
consolidated financial data set forth below should be read in
conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and
related notes and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008(1)
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for per share data)
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Income/(Loss) Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction and clearing fees, net(2)
|
|
$
|
693,229
|
|
|
$
|
490,358
|
|
|
$
|
273,629
|
|
|
$
|
136,976
|
|
|
$
|
90,906
|
|
Market data fees
|
|
|
102,944
|
|
|
|
70,396
|
|
|
|
34,236
|
|
|
|
14,642
|
|
|
|
12,290
|
|
Other
|
|
|
16,905
|
|
|
|
13,539
|
|
|
|
5,934
|
|
|
|
4,247
|
|
|
|
5,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
813,078
|
|
|
|
574,293
|
|
|
|
313,799
|
|
|
|
155,865
|
|
|
|
108,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
|
159,792
|
|
|
|
101,397
|
|
|
|
49,750
|
|
|
|
35,753
|
|
|
|
30,074
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
29,705
|
|
|
|
23,047
|
|
|
|
11,395
|
|
|
|
10,124
|
|
|
|
12,312
|
|
Patent royalty
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,705
|
|
|
|
9,039
|
|
|
|
1,491
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
CBOT merger-related transaction costs(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
67,800
|
|
|
|
50,759
|
|
|
|
25,266
|
|
|
|
17,395
|
|
|
|
16,578
|
|
Floor closure costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
62,247
|
|
|
|
32,701
|
|
|
|
13,714
|
|
|
|
15,083
|
|
|
|
17,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
319,544
|
|
|
|
220,730
|
|
|
|
109,164
|
|
|
|
99,660
|
|
|
|
76,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
493,534
|
|
|
|
353,563
|
|
|
|
204,635
|
|
|
|
56,205
|
|
|
|
32,394
|
|
Other income (expense), net(4)(5)
|
|
|
(20,038
|
)
|
|
|
4,871
|
|
|
|
7,908
|
|
|
|
3,790
|
|
|
|
1,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
473,496
|
|
|
|
358,434
|
|
|
|
212,543
|
|
|
|
59,995
|
|
|
|
33,722
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
172,524
|
|
|
|
117,822
|
|
|
|
69,275
|
|
|
|
19,585
|
|
|
|
11,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income(5)
|
|
$
|
300,972
|
|
|
$
|
240,612
|
|
|
$
|
143,268
|
|
|
$
|
40,410
|
|
|
$
|
21,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption adjustments to redeemable stock put(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,319
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
300,972
|
|
|
$
|
240,612
|
|
|
$
|
143,268
|
|
|
$
|
(20,909
|
)
|
|
$
|
21,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share(5)(7):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
4.23
|
|
|
$
|
3.49
|
|
|
$
|
2.54
|
|
|
$
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
4.17
|
|
|
$
|
3.39
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
$
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding(7):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
71,184
|
|
|
|
68,985
|
|
|
|
56,474
|
|
|
|
53,218
|
|
|
|
52,865
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
72,164
|
|
|
|
70,980
|
|
|
|
59,599
|
|
|
|
53,218
|
|
|
|
53,062
|
|
54
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We acquired several companies during the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 and have included the financial
results of these companies in our consolidated financial
statements effective from the respective acquisition dates
forward. Refer to note 3 to our consolidated financial
statements and related notes, which are included elsewhere in
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
for more information on these acquisitions. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes revenues from related parties generated in the ordinary
course of our business. For a presentation and discussion of our
revenues attributable to related parties for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, see our consolidated
statements of income and note 12 to our consolidated
financial statements that are included elsewhere in this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K.
Our transaction and clearing fees are presented net of rebates.
For a discussion of these rebates, see Item 7
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations included elsewhere in
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. |
|
(3) |
|
In 2007, we incurred $11.1 million in transaction costs
directly relating to the proposed merger with CBOT Holdings,
Inc., or CBOT. We did not succeed in our proposed merger with
CBOT and the Chicago Mercantile Exchange completed its
acquisition of CBOT in July 2007. These costs are classified as
CBOT merger-related transaction costs in the
accompanying consolidated statement of income for the year ended
December 31, 2007. See note 17 to our consolidated
financial statements and related notes that are included
elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. |
|
(4) |
|
The financial results for the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007 include $13.2 million and $15.5 million,
respectively, in interest expense on our outstanding
indebtedness and $6.0 million and $3.1 million,
respectively, in interest expense relating to the Russell
Licensing Agreement. The financial results for the year ended
December 31, 2007 include a gain on disposal of an asset of
$9.3 million. Refer to notes 7, 9 and 15 to our
consolidated financial statements and related notes, which are
included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
for more information on these items. |
|
(5) |
|
We have an 8% equity ownership in the National Commodity and
Derivatives Exchange, Ltd, or NCDEX, a derivatives exchange
located in Mumbai, India, which we acquired for
$37.0 million in 2006. The NCDEX investment is classified
as a cost method investment. The financial results for the year
ended December 31, 2008 include an impairment loss on the
NCDEX cost method investment of $15.7 million, which was
recorded as other expense. For additional information, refer to
note 6 to our consolidated financial statements and related
notes, which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Excluding this charge, net of taxes, our consolidated net income
for the year ended December 31, 2008 would have been
$312.2 million and basic and diluted earnings per share
would have been $4.39 and $4.33, respectively. See Item 7
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
Non-GAAP Financial Measures included elsewhere is
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. |
|
(6) |
|
In connection with our formation, we granted a put option to
Continental Power Exchange, Inc., an entity controlled by our
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Jeffrey C. Sprecher. The
put option would have required us under certain circumstances to
purchase Continental Power Exchange, Inc.s equity interest
in our business at a purchase price equal to the greater of the
fair market value of the equity interest or $5 million. We
initially recorded the redeemable stock put at the minimum
$5 million redemption threshold. We adjusted the redeemable
stock put to its redemption amount at each subsequent balance
sheet date. Adjustments to the redemption amount were recorded
to retained earnings or, in the absence of positive retained
earnings, additional paid-in capital. In October 2005, we
entered into an agreement with Continental Power Exchange, Inc.
to terminate the redeemable stock put upon the closing of our
initial public offering of common stock in November 2005. We
increased the redeemable stock put by $61.3 million during
the year ended December 31, 2005 resulting from an increase
in the estimated fair value of our common stock from $8.00 per
share as of December 31, 2004 to $35.90 per share as of
November 21, 2005, the closing date of our initial public
offering of common stock and the termination date of the
redeemable stock put. The balance of the redeemable stock put on
November 21, 2005 was $78.9 million and was
reclassified to additional paid-in capital upon its termination.
In connection with the termination of the put option, we amended
certain registration rights previously granted to Continental
Power |
55
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange, Inc. pursuant to which we may be obligated to pay the
expenses of registration, including underwriting discounts up to
a maximum of $4.5 million. |
|
(7) |
|
The impact of outstanding stock options is considered to be
antidilutive in the calculation of diluted earnings per share
when a net loss available to common shareholders is reported.
Our outstanding stock options have not been included in the
computation of diluted earnings per share for the year ended
December 31, 2005 due to the $20.9 million net loss
available to common shareholders as a result of the
$61.3 million charged to retained earnings related to the
redeemable stock put adjustments. Therefore, our diluted
earnings per share are computed in the same manner as basic
earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents(1)
|
|
$
|
283,522
|
|
|
$
|
119,597
|
|
|
$
|
204,257
|
|
|
$
|
20,002
|
|
|
$
|
61,199
|
|
Short-term investments(1)
|
|
|
3,419
|
|
|
|
140,955
|
|
|
|
77,354
|
|
|
|
111,181
|
|
|
|
5,700
|
|
Margin deposits and guaranty funds assets(2)
|
|
|
12,117,820
|
|
|
|
792,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
12,552,588
|
|
|
|
1,142,094
|
|
|
|
340,917
|
|
|
|
164,015
|
|
|
|
100,042
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
88,952
|
|
|
|
63,524
|
|
|
|
26,280
|
|
|
|
20,348
|
|
|
|
19,364
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net(3)
|
|
|
2,163,671
|
|
|
|
1,547,409
|
|
|
|
81,126
|
|
|
|
76,054
|
|
|
|
86,075
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
14,959,581
|
|
|
|
2,796,345
|
|
|
|
493,211
|
|
|
|
265,770
|
|
|
|
207,518
|
|
Margin deposits and guaranty funds liabilities(2)
|
|
|
12,117,820
|
|
|
|
792,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
12,311,642
|
|
|
|
910,961
|
|
|
|
37,899
|
|
|
|
26,394
|
|
|
|
34,440
|
|
Current and long-term debt(4)
|
|
|
379,375
|
|
|
|
221,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
2,006,231
|
|
|
|
1,476,856
|
|
|
|
454,468
|
|
|
|
232,623
|
|
|
|
132,149
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We received net proceeds from our initial public offering of our
common stock in November 2005 of $60.8 million, after
deducting the underwriting discount. We invested a portion of
this cash in short-term investments. Due to the adverse
conditions in the credit markets, in 2008 we decided to shift
more of our funds into cash equivalent investments as compared
to short-term investments. |
|
(2) |
|
Clearing members of ICE Clear Europe, ICE Clear U.S. and ICE
Clear Canada are required to deposit original margin and
variation margin and to make deposits to a guaranty fund. The
cash deposits made to these margin accounts and to the guaranty
fund are recorded in the consolidated balance sheet as current
assets with offsetting current liabilities to the clearing
members that deposited them. ICE Clear Europe began clearing
contracts in November 2008 upon the transition of clearing from
LCH.Clearnet Ltd. See note 14 to our consolidation
financial statement and related notes that are included
elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. |
|
(3) |
|
The increase in the goodwill and intangible assets in 2008
primarily relates to the acquisition of Creditex Group Inc. in
August 2008. The increase in the goodwill and other intangible
assets in 2007 primarily relates to the acquisition of ICE
Futures U.S. in January 2007. See notes 3 and 8 to our
consolidation financial statements and related notes that are
included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. |
|
(4) |
|
We borrowed $250.0 million in a senior unsecured credit
facility in connection with the purchase of ICE Futures U.S. in
January 2007 and we borrowed an additional $195.0 million
in 2008 in connection with our stock repurchases. See
note 9 to our consolidation financial statements and
related notes that are included elsewhere in this Annual Report
on
Form 10-K. |
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for rate per contract and
percentages)
|
|
|
Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Average Daily Trading Fee Revenues(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our U.K. futures business average daily exchange and clearing
fee revenues
|
|
$
|
756
|
|
|
$
|
696
|
|
|
$
|
482
|
|
|
$
|
226
|
|
|
$
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our U.S. and Canadian futures business average daily exchange
and clearing fee revenues
|
|
|
613
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our bilateral global OTC business average daily commission fee
revenues
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Our cleared global OTC business average daily commission and
clearing fee revenues
|
|
|
982
|
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our global OTC business average daily commission and clearing
fee revenues
|
|
|
1,323
|
|
|
|
845
|
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our total average daily exchange, commission and clearing fee
revenues
|
|
$
|
2,692
|
|
|
$
|
1,967
|
|
|
$
|
1,071
|
|
|
$
|
538
|
|
|
$
|
353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Trading Volume(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures volume
|
|
|
237,226
|
|
|
|
191,848
|
|
|
|
92,721
|
|
|
|
42,055
|
|
|
|
35,541
|
|
Futures average daily volume
|
|
|
922
|
|
|
|
771
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
OTC energy volume
|
|
|
247,093
|
|
|
|
176,561
|
|
|
|
130,832
|
|
|
|
61,999
|
|
|
|
30,961
|
|
OTC energy average daily volume
|
|
|
977
|
|
|
|
723
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
Our ICE Futures Europe rate per contract
|
|
$
|
1.23
|
|
|
$
|
1.29
|
|
|
$
|
1.32
|
|
|
$
|
1.35
|
|
|
$
|
1.26
|
|
Our soft agricultural futures and options rate per contract
|
|
$
|
2.13
|
|
|
$
|
1.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our financial futures and options rate per contract
|
|
$
|
0.96
|
|
|
$
|
1.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTC Participants Trading Commission Percentages:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial companies (including merchant energy)
|
|
|
46.8
|
%
|
|
|
45.5
|
%
|
|
|
46.8
|
%
|
|
|
48.8
|
%
|
|
|
56.5
|
%
|
Banks and financial institutions
|
|
|
23.4
|
%
|
|
|
23.6
|
%
|
|
|
21.2
|
%
|
|
|
20.5
|
%
|
|
|
22.4
|
%
|
Liquidity providers
|
|
|
29.8
|
%
|
|
|
30.9
|
%
|
|
|
32.0
|
%
|
|
|
30.7
|
%
|
|
|
21.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the total commission fee, exchange fee and clearing
fee revenues for the year divided by the number of trading days
during that year. |
|
(2) |
|
Volume is calculated based on the number of contracts traded in
our markets, which is the number of round turn trades. Each
round turn trade represents a matched buy and sell order of one
contract. Average daily volume represents the total volume, in
contracts, for the year divided by the number of trading days
during the year. |
|
|
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
The following discussion contains forward-looking statements
that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could
differ materially from those anticipated in these
forward-looking statements for many reasons, including those set
forth in Item 1(A) under the heading Risk
Factors and elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The following discussion is qualified in its entirety by, and
should be read in
57
conjunction with, the more detailed information contained in
Item 6 Selected Financial Data and our
consolidated financial statements and related notes included
elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Overview
and Our Business Environment
We are a leading regulated global futures exchange and
over-the-counter,
or OTC, market operator. We operate the leading electronic
futures and OTC marketplace for trading a broad array of energy,
soft agricultural and agricultural commodities, credit default
swaps, or CDS, and financial products. Currently, we are the
only marketplace to offer an integrated electronic platform for
side-by-side
trading of products in both futures and OTC markets, together
with clearing services. Through our widely-distributed
electronic marketplaces, we bring together buyers and sellers of
derivative and physical commodities and financial contracts and
offer a range of services to support our participants risk
management.
We conduct our regulated U.K. energy futures markets through our
wholly-owned subsidiary, ICE Futures Europe. We conduct our
regulated U.S. futures markets through our wholly-owned
subsidiary, ICE Futures U.S. We conduct our regulated
Canadian futures markets through our wholly-owned subsidiary,
ICE Futures Canada. ICE Futures Europe clears its business
through ICE Clear Europe, ICE Futures U.S. clears its
business through ICE Clear U.S. and ICE Futures Canada
clears its business through ICE Clear Canada. We completed our
acquisition of ICE Futures U.S. in January 2007 and our
acquisition of ICE Futures Canada in August 2007. The launch of
ICE Clear Europe occurred in November 2008, completing our
strategic plan to offer clearing services through wholly-owned
clearing businesses in the United States, the United Kingdom and
Canada. Clearing services for our U.K. energy futures and
cleared OTC business were previously outsourced to a third party
U.K. clearing house.
We completed our acquisition of Creditex Group Inc., or
Creditex, in August 2008, as a result of which Creditex became a
wholly-owned subsidiary of ICE and continues to operate under
the name Creditex in our OTC markets. Creditex is a market
leader and innovator in the execution and processing of CDS,
with markets spanning the United States, Europe and Asia.
Creditex is a leading execution and trade processing firm in the
CDS markets, including indexes, single-name instruments and
standardized tranches. In October 2008, we announced our planned
acquisition of The Clearing Corporation as part of our strategy
to offer clearing in the CDS market.
We operate three business segments: a futures segment, a
global OTC segment and a market data segment. In our futures
markets, we offer trading in standardized derivative contracts
on our regulated exchanges. In our OTC markets, which include
energy markets and credit derivatives, we offer trading in
over-the-counter,
or off-exchange, derivative contracts, including contracts that
provide for the physical delivery of an underlying asset or
commodity or for financial settlement based on the price of an
underlying asset or commodity. Through our market data segment,
we offer a variety of market data services and products for both
futures and OTC market participants and observers.
Our business is primarily transaction based, and our revenues
and profitability relate directly to the level of trading
activity in our markets. Trading volumes are driven by a number
of factors, including the degree of volatility in the prices of
commodities and financial instruments such as equity indexes and
foreign exchange, as well as regulatory changes, fee
modifications and competition. Price volatility increases the
need to hedge contractual price risk and creates opportunities
for the exchange of risk between market participants. Changes in
our futures trading volumes and OTC average daily commissions
have also been driven by varying levels of volatility and
liquidity both in our markets and in the broader commodities
markets, which influence trading volumes across all of the
markets we operate.
We operate our futures and OTC markets primarily on our
electronic platforms and we offer ICE Futures U.S.s soft
agricultural commodity and financial options markets on both our
electronic platform and through our trading floor based in New
York. In February 2008, we closed our open-outcry trading floors
for futures markets in New York and Dublin and now only offer
soft agricultural commodity and financial options markets
through the open-outcry trading floor in New York. We believe
that the move toward electronic trade execution, together with
the improved accessibility for new market participants and the
increased adoption of commodities as a tradable, investable
asset class, has contributed to and will likely support
continued secular
58
growth in the global markets. We also operate certain of our OTC
markets through employee-based voice brokering. As participation
continues to increase and as participants continue to employ
more sophisticated financial instruments and risk management
strategies to manage their price exposure, we believe there
remains opportunity for further growth in the electronic trading
of derivatives on a global basis. We do not risk our own capital
by engaging in any trading activities or by extending credit to
market participants.
Financial
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
Our consolidated revenues increased by 41.6% to a record
$813.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008,
compared to 2007, primarily due to increased contract volumes in
our futures and OTC markets resulting from increased volatility,
organic growth and acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
Our consolidated operating expenses increased by 44.8% to
$319.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008,
compared to the same period in 2007, primarily due to
acquisitions, higher cash and non-cash compensation costs, costs
associated with the establishment of ICE Clear Europe, the
closure of our futures trading floors in New York and Dublin and
increased technology spending and related depreciation expenses,
partially offset by CBOT Holdings, Inc., or CBOT, merger-related
transaction costs incurred during the year ended
December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
Our consolidated operating margin decreased to 60.7% for the
year ended December 31, 2008, compared to 61.6% for the
same period in 2007.
|
|
|
|
Our consolidated net income increased by 25.1% to
$301.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008,
compared to the same period in 2007.
|
|
|
|
Consolidated cash flows from operations increased by 30.3% to
$375.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008,
compared to the same period in 2007.
|
On a consolidated basis, we recorded $813.1 million in
revenues for the year ended December 31, 2008 , a 41.6%
increase compared to $574.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007. Consolidated net income was
$301.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, a
25.1% increase compared to $240.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007. The financial results for the year
ended December 31, 2008 include an impairment loss of
$15.7 million, which we recorded as other expense, relating
to our investment in the National Commodity and Derivatives
Exchange, Ltd, or NCDEX. NCDEX is a derivatives exchange located
in Mumbai India, in which we have an 8% equity ownership
interest, which we acquired for $37.0 million in 2006. For
additional information, refer to note 6 to our consolidated
financial statements and related notes, which are included
elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Excluding this loss, net of taxes, our consolidated net income
for the year ended December 31, 2008 would have been
$312.2 million. See also
Non-GAAP Financial Measures below.
The financial results for the year ended December 31, 2007
include a gain of $9.3 million relating to the sale of our
former open-outcry disaster recovery site in London and
$11.1 million in CBOT merger-related transaction costs.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, 237.2 million
contracts were traded in our futures markets, up 23.7% from
191.8 million contracts traded during the year ended
December 31, 2007. During the year ended December 31,
2008, 247.1 million contract equivalents were traded in our
OTC energy markets, up 39.9% from 176.6 million contract
equivalents traded during the year ended December 31, 2007.
Recent
Developments and Trends
Beginning in the third quarter of 2007, the U.S. financial
markets entered into a period of reduced liquidity, outflow of
customer funds, defaults and extraordinary volatility due to
deteriorating credit market conditions. In the subsequent
period, these conditions expanded to the global financial
markets and as a result, many market participants, including
many of our key customers, experienced reduced liquidity with
continued credit contraction, financial institution
consolidation and market participant bankruptcies. While our
business continued to grow in 2008 amid these market conditions,
extraordinary volatility levels coupled with a sustained period
of uncertainty relating to counterparty creditworthiness and the
availability of credit to facilitate trading have limited
trading participation in certain of our markets starting in the
fourth quarter of
59
2008, which may continue. As a result of the current market
conditions, regulators and legislators may pass new regulations
or laws that impact the way our markets operate. Further, the
loans and equity investments made by governmental bodies in
financial institutions could result in additional regulation and
governmental oversight of these entities, many of which are
active participants in our markets. We believe the availability
of central counterparty clearing for futures and OTC contracts
has supported and will continue to support the liquidity and
participation in our marketplaces.
The establishment of ICE Clear Europe in November 2008 has
facilitated our launch of new cleared OTC contracts. Since the
launch of ICE Clear Europe, we have either launched or announced
the launch of over 70 new cleared energy OTC products. We
believe that controlling our clearing process will allow us to
introduce more products and services to the futures and OTC
markets for broker-dealers and for our customers, as well as
ensure technology and operational service levels meet the
efficiency standards that we have set within our execution
business. We also believe that this flexibility will allow us to
increase our speed-to-market for new cleared products and to
expand our products further into physically-delivered commodity
products on a competitive basis with other derivatives exchanges
that manage their own clearing and risk management services. We
have also announced the launch of new cleared sugar, coffee and
cocoa swaps for ICE Futures U.S. to be cleared through ICE
Clear U.S. The new cleared swaps are the first such
contracts that we have offered for ICE Futures
U.S. products that are specifically designed to meet the
needs of the OTC market participants.
Variability
in Quarterly Comparisons
In addition to general conditions in the financial markets and
in our markets in particular, commodity trading has historically
been subject to variability in trading volumes due to several
factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
Geopolitical Events: Geopolitical events tend
to impact global commodity prices and may impact commodity
supply. Because commodity prices often move in conjunction with
changes in the perception of geopolitical risk, these events in
the past have impacted trading activities in our markets due to
the increased volatility and need for risk management in times
of uncertainty.
|
|
|
|
Weather: Weather events have been an important
factor in price volatility and the supply and demand of energy,
soft agricultural and agricultural commodities and, therefore,
the trading activities of market participants. Unexpected or
extreme weather conditions, such as low temperatures or
hurricanes, and other events that cause demand increases, supply
disruptions or unexpected volatility tend to result in business
disruptions and expanded hedging and trading activity in our
markets.
|
|
|
|
Real and Perceived Supply and Demand
Imbalances: Various agencies and groups, such as
the International Energy Agency and the U.S. Energy
Information Administration, regularly track commodity supply
data. Reporting on supply or production may impact trading
volume and price volatility due to real or perceived supply and
demand imbalances.
|
|
|
|
Regulatory Considerations: Generally,
legislative and regulatory bodies have expressed increased
concern regarding derivatives markets when underlying commodity
and financial instrument prices are volatile. As a result,
legislative and regulatory actions, including proposed actions,
may create uncertainty for market participants and affect
trading volumes.
|
|
|
|
Availability of Capital: Margin is required to
be deposited for each cleared trade executed in our markets.
Cost of capital, balance sheet capacity available to support
trading, capital markets conditions or any combination of these
factors may impact trading volumes due to higher costs or lower
availability of capital available to support trading.
|
|
|
|
Number of Trading Days: The variability in the
number of business days in each quarter affects our revenues,
and will affect quarter-to-quarter revenue comparisons, since
trading generally only takes place on business days.
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
Seasonality: Participants engaged in energy,
soft agricultural and agricultural businesses tend to experience
moderate seasonal fluctuations in demand and price volatility,
although such seasonal impacts have been somewhat negated in
periods of high volume trading.
|
These and other factors could cause our revenues to fluctuate
from period to period. These fluctuations may affect the
reliability of period to period comparisons of our revenues and
operating results when, for example, these comparisons are
between periods in different seasons. Inter-seasonal comparisons
will not necessarily be indicative of our results for future
periods.
Segment
Reporting
For financial reporting purposes, as of December 31, 2008,
our business is divided into three segments: our futures
business segment, our OTC business segment and our market data
business segment. For a discussion of these segments and related
financial disclosure, refer to note 18 to our consolidated
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Our
Futures Business Segment
The following table presents, for the years indicated, selected
statement of income data in dollars and as a percentage of
revenues for our futures business segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008(1)
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction and clearing fees, net(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICE Brent Crude futures
|
|
$
|
92,971
|
|
|
|
25.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
87,308
|
|
|
|
29.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
64,126
|
|
|
|
48.8
|
%
|
ICE WTI Crude futures
|
|
|
47,941
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
49,942
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
|
|
|
30,683
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
|
ICE Gas Oil futures
|
|
|
42,641
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
36,890
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
|
|
|
26,363
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
Sugar futures and options(3)
|
|
|
76,948
|
|
|
|
20.9
|
|
|
|
48,647
|
|
|
|
16.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cotton futures and options(3)
|
|
|
23,171
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
17,920
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Russell index futures and options(3)
|
|
|
13,540
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other futures products and options
|
|
|
54,289
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
37,344
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
2,248
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Intersegment fees
|
|
|
5,746
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
3,754
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
4,404
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Market data fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
10,693
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
10,740
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
3,568
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
367,940
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
293,087
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
131,428
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses(4)
|
|
|
80,506
|
|
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
|
80,053
|
|
|
|
27.3
|
|
|
|
25,939
|
|
|
|
19.7
|
|
Intersegment expenses(5)
|
|
|
38,767
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
30,836
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
24,892
|
|
|
|
18.9
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
13,472
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
6,386
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
2,031
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
132,745
|
|
|
|
36.1
|
|
|
|
117,275
|
|
|
|
40.0
|
|
|
|
52,862
|
|
|
|
40.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
235,195
|
|
|
|
63.9
|
|
|
|
175,812
|
|
|
|
60.0
|
|
|
|
78,566
|
|
|
|
59.8
|
|
Other income, net(6)
|
|
|
5,165
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
14,217
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
1,687
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
84,017
|
|
|
|
22.8
|
|
|
|
64,005
|
|
|
|
21.8
|
|
|
|
28,089
|
|
|
|
21.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
156,343
|
|
|
|
42.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
126,024
|
|
|
|
43.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
52,164
|
|
|
|
39.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The financial results for the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007 include the financial results for ICE Futures U.S.
subsequent to its acquisition on January 12, 2007. |
61
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Revenues attributable to related parties were $110,000, $424,000
and $12.7 million for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. For a discussion of our
related parties, see note 12 to our consolidated financial
statements and related notes, which are included elsewhere in
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Our transaction and clearing fees are presented net of rebates. |
|
(3) |
|
Sugar, cotton and Russell index futures and options began
trading in January 2007 in connection with the ICE Futures U.S.
acquisition. The Russell index futures and options began trading
exclusively on ICE Futures U.S. in September 2008. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes compensation and benefits expenses and professional
services expenses. |
|
(5) |
|
Intersegment expenses represent fees paid by our futures
business segment for support provided by the OTC business
segment to operate the electronic trading platform used in our
futures business. |
|
(6) |
|
The financial results for the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007 include $6.0 million and $3.1 million,
respectively, in interest expense relating to the Russell
Licensing Agreement. The financial results for the year ended
December 31, 2007 include a gain on disposal of an asset of
$9.3 million. Refer to notes 7 and 15 to our
consolidated financial statements and related notes, which are
included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
for more information on these two items. |
Our ICE Brent Crude futures contract is a benchmark contract
relied upon by a broad range of market participants, including
certain large oil producing nations, to price their crude oil.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, the average daily
quantity of Brent crude oil traded in our markets was
264.0 million barrels, with an average notional daily value
of over $26.1 billion. We believe that market participants
are increasingly relying on this contract for their risk
management activities, as evidenced by steady increases in
traded volumes and open interest over the past several years.
With the trading of both our ICE Brent Crude futures contract
and our ICE WTI Crude futures contract, we achieved a 45.7%
market share of the global oil futures contracts traded for the
year ended December 31, 2008.
In our futures business segment, we earn transaction fees from
both counterparties to each futures contract or option on
futures contract that is traded, based on the volume of the
commodity underlying the futures or option contract that is
traded. In addition to our transaction fees, a futures
participant must pay a fee to the clearing house for the benefit
of clearing and, if applicable, a fee for the services of the
relevant member clearing firm, or FCM. For ICE Futures
U.S. and ICE Futures Canada, our transaction fees include
both a trading and a clearing fee as we own 100% of ICE Clear
U.S. and ICE Clear Canada. However, consistent with our
cleared OTC business, in the past, we did not derive any direct
revenues from the clearing process associated with ICE Futures
Europe and participants paid the clearing fees directly to a
third party U.K. clearing house. However, upon the launch of ICE
Clear Europe in November 2008, we now capture clearing revenues
associated with our ICE Futures Europe business, the amount of
which will depend upon many considerations, including but not
limited to transaction volume, pricing and new products. We
charge transaction and clearing fees to the clearing members of
ICE Futures Europe, ICE Futures U.S. and ICE Futures Canada
for contracts traded for their own account and for contracts
traded on behalf of their customers or local traders.
We derived futures transaction and clearing fees of
$351.5 million, $278.6 million and $123.4 million
for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, representing 43.2%, 48.5% and 39.3%, respectively,
of our consolidated revenues. The transaction and clearing fees
earned on energy futures and option transactions, which occur
through ICE Futures Europe, increased $16.9 million or 9.4%
to $195.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008
from $178.9 million for the year ended December 31,
2007. The transaction and clearing fees earned on soft
agriculture, agriculture and financial futures and options
transactions, which occur through ICE Futures U.S. and ICE
Futures Canada, increased $56.0 million or 56.2% to
$155.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008
from $99.7 million for the year ended December 31,
2007.
Transaction and clearing fees are presented net of rebates. We
recorded rebates in our futures segment of $76.3 million,
$33.7 million and $7.2 million for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The
increase in the rebates is due primarily to an increase in the
amount of rebates offered on various futures contracts resulting
from higher contract volumes traded during the period. We offer
rebates in certain of our markets primarily to help generate
market liquidity and trading volumes by providing customers
62
trading in those markets a full or partial discount to the
applicable commission rate. These rebates reduce revenue that we
would have generated had we charged full commissions and had we
generated the same volume without the rebate program.
A contract is a standardized quantity of the physical commodity
underlying each futures contract. The following table presents
the underlying commodity size per futures contract traded in our
key futures markets as well as the relevant standard of measure
for each contract:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures Contract
|
|
Size
|
|
|
Measure
|
|
|
ICE Brent Crude
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
Barrels
|
|
ICE WTI Crude
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
Barrels
|
|
ICE Gas Oil
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
Metric Tonnes
|
|
Sugar
|
|
|
112,000
|
|
|
|
Pounds
|
|
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, trading
activity in our futures markets for commodity type based on the
total number of contracts traded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Number of futures and option contracts traded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICE Brent Crude futures
|
|
|
68,368
|
|
|
|
59,729
|
|
|
|
44,346
|
|
ICE WTI Crude futures
|
|
|
51,092
|
|
|
|
51,388
|
|
|
|
28,673
|
|
ICE Gas Oil futures
|
|
|
28,805
|
|
|
|
24,510
|
|
|
|
18,290
|
|
Sugar futures and options(1)
|
|
|
36,437
|
|
|
|
26,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cotton futures and options(1)
|
|
|
10,631
|
|
|
|
9,526
|
|
|
|
|
|
Russell index futures and options(1)
|
|
|
17,054
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other futures and options(2)
|
|
|
24,839
|
|
|
|
20,002
|
|
|
|
1,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
237,226
|
|
|
|
191,848
|
|
|
|
92,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Sugar, cotton and Russell index futures and options began
trading in January 2007 in connection with the ICE Futures U.S.
acquisition. The Russell index futures and options began trading
exclusively on ICE Futures U.S. in September 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
The increase in the other futures and options contracts
primarily relates to the trading of the coffee futures and
options and cocoa futures and options, which began trading in
January 2007 in connection with the ICE Futures U.S. acquisition. |
63
The following table presents our year-end open interest for our
futures contracts. Open interest is the number of contracts
(long or short) that a member holds either for its own account
or on behalf of its clients. Open interest refers to the total
number of contracts that are currently open in other
words, contracts that have been traded but not yet liquidated by
either an offsetting trade, exercise, expiration or assignment.
Open interest is also a measure of the future activity remaining
to be closed out in terms of the number of contracts that
members and their clients continue to hold in the particular
contract and by the number of contracts held for each contract
month listed by the exchange.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Open interest futures and options contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICE Brent Crude futures
|
|
|
614
|
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
ICE WTI Crude futures
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
|
418
|
|
ICE Gas Oil futures
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
Sugar futures and options(1)
|
|
|
1,707
|
|
|
|
1,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cotton futures and options(1)
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
579
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coffee futures and options(1)
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cocoa futures and options(1)
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
|
|
Russell index futures and options(1)
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other futures and options
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
577
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5,240
|
|
|
|
4,923
|
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Sugar, cotton, coffee, cocoa and Russell index futures and
options began trading in January 2007 in connection with the ICE
Futures U.S. acquisition. The Russell index futures and options
began trading exclusively on ICE Futures U.S. in September 2008. |
64
Our
OTC Business Segment
The following table presents, for the years indicated, selected
statement of income data in dollars and as a percentage of
revenues for our OTC business segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008(1)
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction and clearing fees, net(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American natural gas
|
|
$
|
214,403
|
|
|
|
49.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
155,533
|
|
|
|
56.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
117,302
|
|
|
|
60.0
|
%
|
North American power
|
|
|
60,400
|
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
43,349
|
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
|
|
27,223
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
Credit derivatives(3)
|
|
|
52,098
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other commodities markets
|
|
|
7,954
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
6,873
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
2,175
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Electronic trade confirmation
|
|
|
6,873
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
6,010
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
3,509
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Intersegment fees
|
|
|
41,199
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
32,311
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
26,704
|
|
|
|
13.7
|
|
Market data fees
|
|
|
48,458
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
27,256
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
16,168
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6,165
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
2,782
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
2,366
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
437,550
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
274,114
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
195,447
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses(4)
|
|
|
174,113
|
|
|
|
39.8
|
|
|
|
94,350
|
|
|
|
34.4
|
|
|
|
67,451
|
|
|
|
34.5
|
|
Intersegment expenses
|
|
|
34,004
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
19,405
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
11,221
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
CBOT merger-related transaction costs(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,121
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
48,651
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
26,286
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
11,671
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
256,768
|
|
|
|
58.7
|
|
|
|
151,162
|
|
|
|
55.1
|
|
|
|
90,343
|
|
|
|
46.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
180,782
|
|
|
|
41.3
|
|
|
|
122,952
|
|
|
|
44.9
|
|
|
|
105,104
|
|
|
|
53.8
|
|
Other income (expense), net(6)(7)
|
|
|
(26,281
|
)
|
|
|
(6.0
|
)
|
|
|
(9,846
|
)
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)
|
|
|
6,248
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
61,622
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
33,907
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
|
|
33,858
|
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income(7)
|
|
$
|
92,879
|
|
|
|
21.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
79,199
|
|
|
|
28.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
77,494
|
|
|
|
39.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The financial results for the year ended December 31, 2008
include the financial results for Creditex subsequent to its
acquisition on August 29, 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
Revenues attributable to related parties were $570,000,
$1.3 million and $3.2 million for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. For a
discussion of our related parties, see note 12 to our
consolidated financial statements, which are included elsewhere
in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Our transaction and clearing fees are presented net of rebates. |
|
(3) |
|
Credit derivatives began trading on September 1, 2008 in
connection with the closing of the Creditex acquisition. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes compensation and benefits expenses, professional
services expenses and patent royalty expenses. |
|
(5) |
|
The financial results for the year ended December 31, 2007
include $11.1 million in CBOT merger-related transaction
costs. Refer to note 17 to our consolidated financial
statements and related notes, which are included elsewhere in
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
for more information. |
|
(6) |
|
The financial results for the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007 include $12.2 million and $15.5 million,
respectively, in interest expense on outstanding indebtedness.
Refer to note 9 to our consolidated financial statements
and related notes, which are included elsewhere in this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K,
for more information. |
|
(7) |
|
The financial results for the year ended December 31, 2008
include an impairment loss on the NCDEX cost method investment
of $15.7 million, which was recorded as other expense. For
additional information, |
65
|
|
|
|
|
refer to note 6 to our consolidated financial statements
and related notes, which are included elsewhere in this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K.
Excluding this charge, net of taxes, our OTC business segment
net income for the year ended December 31, 2008 would have
been $104.1 million. See also
Non-GAAP Financial Measures below. |
Revenues in our OTC business segment are generated primarily
through transaction fees earned from trades. While we charge a
monthly data access fee for access to our electronic platform,
we derive a substantial portion of our OTC revenues from
transaction fees paid by participants for each trade that they
execute or clear based on the underlying commodity volume.
Transaction fees are payable by each counterparty to a trade
and, for bilateral trades and trades through Creditex, are
generally due within 30 days of the invoice date. Our OTC
commission rates vary by product and are based on the volume of
the commodity underlying the contract that is traded.
In addition to our transaction fee, a participant that chooses
to clear an OTC trade has to pay a clearing fee and, if
applicable, a fee for the services of the relevant FCM.
Consistent with our ICE Futures Europe business, we did not
derive any direct revenues from the OTC energy clearing process
in the past and participants paid the clearing fees directly to
a third party U.K. clearing house. However, upon the launch of
ICE Clear Europe in November 2008, we now capture clearing
revenues associated with our global OTC segment, the amount of
which will depend upon many considerations, including but not
limited to transaction volume, pricing and new products. For the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, transaction
fees related to cleared trades represented 62.7%, 69.3% and
71.8% of our total OTC revenues, respectively, net of
intersegment fees. Excluding the OTC CDS contracts, which are
all currently traded bilateral, transaction fees related to
cleared energy trades represented 72.2% of our total OTC energy
revenues for the year ended December 31, 2008. We intend to
continue to support the introduction of these products in
response to the requirements of our participants.
We derived transaction and clearing fees for OTC trades of
$334.9 million, $205.8 million and $146.7 million
for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, representing 41.2%, 35.8% and 46.7%, respectively,
of our consolidated revenues.
Transaction and clearing fees are presented net of rebates. We
recorded rebates in our OTC business segment of
$16.7 million, $3.5 million and $203,000 for the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The
increase in the rebates is due primarily to an increase in the
amount of rebates offered for certain contracts in our North
American markets, as well as increased trading activity in
markets where rebates are offered.
The following tables present, for the periods indicated, the
total volume or notional value of the underlying commodity and
number of contracts traded in our OTC markets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Total volume or Notional Value OTC:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American natural gas (in million British thermal units, or
MMBtu)
|
|
|
571,364
|
|
|
|
394,880
|
|
|
|
302,591
|
|
Credit default swaps (notional value)(1)
|
|
$
|
1,064.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American power (in megawatt hours)
|
|
|
6,490
|
|
|
|
5,492
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
Global oil and refined products (in equivalent barrels of oil)
|
|
|
1,036
|
|
|
|
907
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We began offering credit default swaps following our acquisition
of Creditex on August 29, 2008. The notional value
presented is for the period from September 1, 2008 to
December 31, 2008. |
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Number of OTC energy contracts traded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American natural gas
|
|
|
228,554
|
|
|
|
159,659
|
|
|
|
121,047
|
|
North American power
|
|
|
10,085
|
|
|
|
8,331
|
|
|
|
6,014
|
|
Global oil and other
|
|
|
8,454
|
|
|
|
8,571
|
|
|
|
3,771
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
247,093
|
|
|
|
176,561
|
|
|
|
130,832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the underlying commodity size for
selected contracts traded in our OTC markets as well as the
relevant standard of measure for such contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTC Contract
|
|
Size
|
|
Measure
|
|
Financial gas
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
MMBtu
|
Physical gas
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
MMBtu
|
East power
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
Megawatt Hours per day
|
West power
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
Megawatt Hours per day
|
Crude oil
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Barrels
|
Refined oil
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
Barrels
|
The following table presents our year-end open interest for our
cleared OTC energy contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Open interest cleared OTC energy contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American natural gas
|
|
|
7,486
|
|
|
|
5,986
|
|
|
|
3,781
|
|
North American power
|
|
|
1,784
|
|
|
|
1,161
|
|
|
|
792
|
|
Global oil and other
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
9,368
|
|
|
|
7,175
|
|
|
|
4,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our
Market Data Business Segment
The following table presents, for the years indicated, selected
statement of income data in dollars and as a percentage of
revenues for our market data business segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market data fees
|
|
$
|
54,486
|
|
|
|
61.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
43,140
|
|
|
|
69.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
18,032
|
|
|
|
61.8
|
%
|
Intersegment fees
|
|
|
33,432
|
|
|
|
38.0
|
|
|
|
19,079
|
|
|
|
30.7
|
|
|
|
11,123
|
|
|
|
38.2
|
|
Other
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
87,965
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
62,236
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
29,155
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses(2)
|
|
|
2,678
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
2,505
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
2,060
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
Intersegment expenses
|
|
|
7,606
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
4,903
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
6,118
|
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
10,408
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
7,437
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
8,190
|
|
|
|
28.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
77,557
|
|
|
|
88.2
|
|
|
|
54,799
|
|
|
|
88.1
|
|
|
|
20,965
|
|
|
|
71.9
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
1,078
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
26,885
|
|
|
|
30.6
|
|
|
|
19,910
|
|
|
|
32.0
|
|
|
|
7,328
|
|
|
|
25.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
51,750
|
|
|
|
58.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
35,389
|
|
|
|
56.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
13,610
|
|
|
|
46.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Revenues attributable to related parties were $157,000 for the
year ended December 31, 2006. For a discussion of our
related parties, see note 12 to our consolidated financial
statements and related notes, which are included elsewhere in
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes compensation and benefits expenses and professional
services expenses. |
We earn terminal and license fee revenues that we receive from
data vendors through the distribution of real-time and
historical futures prices and other futures market data derived
from trading in our futures markets. We also earn subscription
fee revenues from OTC daily indices, view only access to the OTC
markets and OTC and futures end of day reports. In addition, we
manage the market price validation curves whereby participant
companies subscribe to receive consensus market valuations.
Intersegment
Fees
Our OTC business segment provides and supports the platform for
electronic trading in our futures business segment. Intersegment
fees include charges for developing, operating, managing and
supporting the platform for electronic trading in our futures
business segment. Our futures business segment and our OTC
business segment provide access to trading volumes to our market
data business segment. Our market data business segment provides
marketing and other promotional services to our OTC business
segment. We determine the intercompany or intersegment fees to
be paid by the business segments based on transfer pricing
standards and independent documentation. These intersegment fees
have no impact on our consolidated operating results. We expect
the structure of these intersegment fees to remain unchanged and
expect that they will continue to have no impact on our
consolidated operating results.
Year
Ended December 31, 2008 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2007
Overview
Consolidated net income increased $60.4 million, or 25.1%,
to $301.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008
from $240.6 million for the comparable period in 2007. Net
income from our futures business segment increased
$30.3 million, or 24.1%, to $156.3 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008 from $126.0 million for
the comparable period in 2007, primarily due to higher
transaction fee revenues, partially offset by a gain on disposal
of an asset of $9.3 million incurred during the year ended
December 31, 2007. Net income from our OTC business segment
increased $13.7 million, or 17.3%, to $92.9 million
for the year ended December 31, 2008 from
$79.2 million for the comparable period in 2007, primarily
due to higher transaction fee revenues and $11.1 million in
CBOT merger-related transaction costs incurred during the year
ended December 31, 2007, partially offset by the
$15.7 million NCDEX impairment loss recognized during the
year ended December 31, 2008. Net income from our market
data business segment increased $16.4 million, or 46.2%, to
$51.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008
from $35.4 million for the comparable period in 2007,
primarily due to increased market data fees relating to our
global OTC markets. Consolidated operating income, as a
percentage of consolidated revenues, was 60.7% for the year
ended December 31, 2008 compared to 61.6% for the
comparable period in 2007. Consolidated net income, as a
percentage of consolidated revenues, was 37.0% for the year
ended December 31, 2008 compared to 41.9% for the
comparable period in 2007.
Our consolidated revenues increased $238.8 million, or
41.6%, to $813.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008 from $574.3 million for the
comparable period in 2007. This increase is primarily
attributable to increased trading volumes in our futures and OTC
energy markets, $52.1 million of revenue derived from
execution and processing services provided by Creditex following
our acquisition on August 29, 2008 and increased market
data revenues.
Consolidated operating expenses increased $98.8 million, or
44.8%, to $319.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008 from $220.7 million for the
comparable period in 2007. This increase is primarily
attributable to $42.6 million of expenses relating to
Creditexs business following our acquisition on
August 29, 2008, additional depreciation and amortization
expenses recorded on fixed asset additions and intangible assets
associated with our acquisitions, including $8.4 million
related to Creditex, professional services expenses
68
incurred relating to the establishment of and transition
activities for ICE Clear Europe and higher compensation expenses
incurred during the year ended December 31, 2008 due
primarily to higher non-cash compensation expenses and severance
costs associated with the ICE Futures U.S. floor closure.
These increased costs were partially offset by
$11.1 million in CBOT merger-related transactions costs
incurred during the year ended December 31, 2007.
Revenues
Transaction
and Clearing Fees
Consolidated transaction and clearing fees increased
$202.9 million, or 41.4%, to $693.2 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008 from $490.4 million for
the comparable period in 2007. Transaction and clearing fees, as
a percentage of consolidated revenues, were 85.3% for the year
ended December 31, 2008 compared to 85.4% for the
comparable period in 2007.
Transaction and clearing fees generated in our futures business
segment increased $72.9 million, or 26.2%, to
$351.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008
from $278.6 million for the comparable period in 2007,
while decreasing as a percentage of consolidated revenues to
43.2% for the year ended December 31, 2008 from 48.5% for
the comparable period in 2007. The increase in transaction and
clearing fees in this segment was primarily due to a 23.7%
increase in our futures contract volumes, which was primarily
attributable to increased liquidity brought by new market
participants and price volatility. Volumes in our futures
segment increased to 237.2 million contracts during the
year ended December 31, 2008 from 191.8 million
contracts during the comparable period in 2007. The increase in
transaction and clearing fees also reflects clearing fees
received for contracts traded and cleared on ICE Futures Europe
following the November 2008 launch of ICE Clear Europe and
greater relative volume growth for contracts traded on our ICE
Futures U.S. exchange, which earn a higher transaction fee
or rate per contract. The increase was offset by higher market
maker rebates paid during 2008 compared to 2007. Average
transaction and clearing fees per trading day increased
22.1% to $1.4 million per trading day for the year ended
December 31, 2008 from $1.1 million per trading day
for the comparable period in 2007.
Transaction and clearing fees generated in our OTC business
segment increased $130.0 million, or 61.4%, to
$341.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008
from $211.8 million for the comparable period in 2007,
primarily due to increased trading volumes. Increased trading
volumes were primarily due to increased hedging, new customers,
price volatility, strategic partnerships with Platts and NGX as
well as the acquisitions of ChemConnect, Inc., Chatham Energy
Partners, LLC and Creditex on July 9, 2007, October 1,
2007 and August 29, 2008, respectively. The increase in
transaction and clearing fees also reflects clearing fees
received for cleared OTC contracts following the November 2008
launch of ICE Clear Europe. Transaction and clearing fees
generated by trading in North American natural gas contracts
increased $58.9 million, or 37.9%, to $214.4 million
for year ended December 31, 2008 from $155.5 million
for the comparable period in 2007. In addition, transaction and
clearing fees generated by trading in North American power
contracts increased $17.1 million, or 39.3%, to
$60.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008
from $43.3 million for the comparable period in 2007. We
recognized Creditex transaction fees of $52.1 million for
the year ended December 31, 2008 following our acquisition
on August 29, 2008. Transaction and clearing fees in this
segment, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, increased to
42.0% for the year ended December 31, 2008 from 36.9% for
the comparable period in 2007. The number of transactions or
trades executed in our OTC energy business segment increased by
35.1% to 7.9 million trades for the year ended
December 31, 2008 from 5.9 million trades for the
comparable period in 2007. Average transaction and clearing fees
per trading day for our OTC business segment increased 56.5% to
$1.3 million per trading day for the year ended
December 31, 2008 from $845,000 per trading day for the
comparable period in 2007.
Revenues derived from electronic trade confirmation fees in our
OTC business segment increased $863,000, or 14.4%, to
$6.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 from
$6.0 million for the comparable period in 2007.
Consolidated electronic trade confirmation fees, as a percentage
of consolidated revenues, were 0.8% for the year ended
December 31, 2008 compared to 1.0% for the comparable
period in 2007.
69
Market
Data Fees
Consolidated market data fees increased $32.5 million, or
46.2%, to $102.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008 from $70.4 million for the
comparable period in 2007. This increase was primarily due to
increased data access fees generated in our OTC market and
increased terminal fees and license fees that we receive from
data vendors in exchange for the provision of real-time price
information generated by our futures markets. During the years
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, we recognized
$49.7 million and $28.9 million, respectively, in data
access fees and terminal fees in our energy futures and OTC
businesses. The increase in the data access fees was due to both
an increase in the fees charged for data access, which came into
effect October 1, 2007, and an increase in the number of
customers. During the years ended December 31, 2008 and
2007, we recognized $19.7 million and $13.5 million,
respectively, in terminal and license fees from data vendors in
our energy futures business. The increase in the market data
fees received from data vendors in our futures segment was due
to both an increase in the average charge per terminal and an
increase in the number of terminals. Consolidated market data
fees, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, were 12.7% for
the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to 12.3% for the
comparable period in 2007.
Other
Revenues
Consolidated other revenues increased $3.4 million to
$16.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008
from $13.5 million for the comparable period in 2007.
Consolidated other revenues, as a percentage of consolidated
revenues, were 2.1% for the year ended December 31, 2008
compared to 2.4% for the comparable period in 2007.
Expenses
Compensation
and Benefits
Consolidated compensation and benefits expenses increased
$58.4 million, or 57.6%, to $159.8 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008 from $101.4 million for
the comparable period in 2007. This increase includes
$34.9 million in Creditex compensation and benefits
expenses recognized during the period ended December 31,
2008 following the closing of the acquisition on August 29,
2008, in addition to a $12.8 million increase in non-cash
compensation expenses and $1.7 million of severance costs
associated with the closure of our futures open-outcry trading
floors in New York and Dublin. The increase was also due to
higher bonus accruals that are tied to some portion of our OTC
revenue performance and due to the addition of more highly
skilled and compensated employees, primarily relating to
acquisitions and expansion of our technology staff. The non-cash
compensation expenses recognized in our consolidated financial
statements for our stock options and restricted stock were
$36.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 as
compared to $23.6 million for the comparable period in
2007. This increase was primarily due to non-cash compensation
costs recognized for the performance-based restricted stock that
was granted in December 2006 and December 2007 and the
$4.3 million in non-cash compensation costs related to the
Creditex stock awards we assumed in connection with the
acquisition. For a discussion of our performance-based
restricted shares, see note 10 to our consolidated
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Our employee headcount increased from 506 employees as of
December 31, 2007 to 528 employees as of
December 31, 2008, excluding the employees acquired as a
result of our 2008 acquisitions. We had 267 additional employees
as of December 31, 2008 relating to our acquisitions of
Creditex and YellowJacket in 2008.
We expect that our compensation and benefits expenses will vary
from year to year as a percentage of total revenues due to
additional employees associated with the growth of our business,
variable performance bonuses and non-cash compensation expenses
recognized in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R). Over
the next year, we expect compensation and benefits expenses to
increase from current levels. Consolidated compensation and
benefits expenses, as a percentage of consolidated revenues,
were 19.7% for year ended December 31, 2008 compared to
17.7% for the comparable period in 2007.
Professional
Services
Consolidated professional services expenses increased
$6.7 million, or 28.9%, to $29.7 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008 from $23.0 million for the
comparable period in 2007. This increase was primarily due to
$7.6 million in professional services expenses incurred
during the year ended December 31,
70
2008 relating to the formation of ICE Clear Europe compared to
$3.5 million incurred during the year ended
December 31, 2007. We expect our professional services
expenses to remain relatively constant in future periods.
Consolidated professional services expenses, as a percentage of
consolidated revenues, were 3.7% for the year ended
December 31, 2008 compared to 4.0% for the comparable
period in 2007.
Patent
Royalty
Patent royalty expenses were $1.7 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007. Consolidated patent royalty
expenses, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, were 0.3%
for the year ended December 31, 2007. The patent licensing
agreement terminated on February 20, 2007 and there were no
patent royalty expenses after this date.
CBOT
Merger-Related Transaction Costs
CBOT merger-related transaction costs were $11.1 million
for the year ended December 31, 2007. Consolidated CBOT
merger-related transaction costs, as a percentage of
consolidated revenues, were 1.9% for the year ended
December 31, 2007. We did not incur any CBOT merger-related
transaction costs during the year ended December 31, 2008.
Selling,
General and Administrative
Consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses
increased $17.0 million, or 33.6%, to $67.8 million
for the year ended December 31, 2008 from
$50.8 million for the comparable period in 2007. This
increase was primarily due to increased technology hosting
expenses, hardware and software support, marketing expenses and
rent expense that resulted from the growth of our business and
due to $6.0 million of Creditex selling, general and
administrative expenses following the closing of the acquisition
on August 29, 2008. We expect our selling, general and
administrative expenses to increase in absolute terms in future
periods in connection with the growth of our business.
Consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses, as a
percentage of consolidated revenues, were 8.3% for the year
ended December 31, 2008 compared to 8.8% for the comparable
period in 2007.
Depreciation
and Amortization
Consolidated depreciation and amortization expenses increased
$29.5 million, or 90.4%, to $62.2 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008 from $32.7 million for the
comparable period in 2007. This increase was primarily due to
additional depreciation expenses recorded on fixed asset
additions incurred throughout 2007 and 2008 and due to
additional amortization expenses recorded on the intangible
assets associated with our acquisitions and strategic
partnerships in 2007 and 2008. We recorded amortization expenses
on the acquired intangible assets of $29.8 million and
$9.4 million during the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively. We anticipate that depreciation and
amortization expenses will increase in future periods due to the
amortization of acquired intangible assets and the increase in
our capital expenditures in 2008 and in the foreseeable future.
Consolidated depreciation and amortization expenses, as a
percentage of consolidated revenues, were 7.7% for the year
ended December 31, 2008 compared to 5.7% for the comparable
period in 2007.
Other
Income (Expense)
Consolidated other income (expense) decreased from other income
of $4.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007
to other expense of ($20.0 million) for the year ended
December 31, 2008. This decrease primarily related to a
$15.7 million impairment loss on the NCDEX cost method
investment during the year ended December 31, 2008, a
$9.3 million gain recognized on the sale of our former
open-outcry disaster recover site in London during the year
ended December 31, 2007 and additional interest expense
incurred during the year ended December 31, 2008 on our
borrowing of $195.0 million in September 2008 under our
revolving credit facility. This was partially offset by
$3.1 million in foreign currency transaction gains
recognized during the year ended December 31, 2008 related
to the settlement of foreign currency assets,
71
liabilities and payables that occur through our foreign
operations which are received in non-functional currencies due
to the increase or decrease in the period-end foreign currency
exchange rates between periods.
Income
Taxes
Consolidated tax expense increased $54.7 million to
$172.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008
from $117.8 million for the comparable period in 2007,
primarily due to the increase in our pre-tax income and an
increase in our effective tax rate. Our effective tax rate
increased to 36.4% for the year ended December 31, 2008
from 32.9% for the comparable period in 2007. The effective tax
rate for the year ended December 31, 2008 is higher than
the federal statutory rate primarily due to state taxes and
non-deductible expenses, which were partially offset by
favorable foreign income tax rates, tax exempt interest income
and tax credits. The effective tax rate for the year ended
December 31, 2007 is lower than the federal statutory rate
primarily due to the decision in the second quarter of 2007 to
indefinitely reinvest the earnings of our foreign subsidiaries,
thus eliminating the need to record U.S. taxes on these
earnings. The effective tax rate for the year ended
December 31, 2008 is higher than the effective tax rate for
the year ended December 31, 2007 primarily due to an
increase in the percentage of income taxable in the United
States at higher statutory tax rates in 2008 and the tax benefit
recognized in the first six months of 2007 upon adoption of the
indefinite reinvestment exception of APB Opinion No. 23,
Accounting for Income Taxes-Special Areas.
Year
Ended December 31, 2007 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2006
Overview
Consolidated net income increased $97.3 million, or 67.9%,
to $240.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2007
from $143.3 million for the comparable period in 2006. Net
income from our futures business segment increased
$73.9 million, or 141.6%, to $126.0 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007 from $52.2 million for
the comparable period in 2006, primarily due to higher
transaction fee revenues, which benefited from our acquisition
of ICE Futures U.S. and ICE Futures Canada in 2007. Net
income from our OTC business segment increased
$1.7 million, or 2.2%, to $79.2 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007 from $77.5 million for the
comparable period in 2006. Net income in our OTC business
segment increased primarily due to higher transaction fee
revenues, offset by $11.1 million in CBOT merger-related
transaction costs incurred during the year ended
December 31, 2007 and $15.7 million in interest
expense incurred during the year ended December 31, 2007.
Net income from our market data business segment increased
$21.8 million, or 160.0%, to $35.4 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007 from $13.6 million for
the comparable period in 2006. Net income in our market data
business segment increased primarily due to increased market
data sales in our futures business. Consolidated operating
income, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, was 61.6% for
the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to 65.2% for the
comparable period in 2006. Consolidated net income, as a
percentage of consolidated revenues, was 41.9% for the year
ended December 31, 2007 compared to 45.7% for the
comparable period in 2006.
Our consolidated revenues increased $260.5 million, or
83.0%, to $574.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from $313.8 million for the
comparable period in 2006. This increase is primarily
attributable to increased trading volumes on our electronic
trading platform, revenues derived from ICE Futures
U.S. and ICE Futures Canada following their acquisition,
and increased non-transaction revenues, primarily market data
fees. A significant factor driving our revenues and volume
growth during this period was the continued growth in trading
volume of our energy futures and cleared OTC contracts as a
result of increasing participation in these markets and demand
to risk management within the energy sector.
Consolidated operating expenses increased $111.6 million,
or 102.2%, to $220.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from $109.2 million for the
comparable period in 2006. This increase is primarily
attributable to $55.7 million in ICE Futures
U.S. operating expenses during the year ended
December 31, 2007, amortization expenses on the ICE Futures
U.S. intangibles of $8.2 million during year ended
December 31, 2007, $11.1 million in CBOT
merger-related transaction costs being incurred during the year
ended December 31, 2007, and higher compensation expenses
during the year ended December 31, 2007 due to non-cash
compensation expenses recognized under SFAS No. 123(R)
and an increase in our employee headcount.
72
Revenues
Transaction
and Clearing Fees
Consolidated transaction and clearing fees increased
$216.7 million, or 79.2%, to $490.4 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007 from $273.6 million for
the comparable period in 2006. Transaction and clearing fees, as
a percentage of consolidated revenues, were 85.4% for the year
ended December 31, 2007 compared to 87.2% for the
comparable period in 2006.
Transaction and clearing fees generated in our futures business
segment increased $155.2 million, or 125.7%, to
$278.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2007
from $123.4 million for the comparable period in 2006,
while increasing as a percentage of consolidated revenues to
48.5% for the year ended December 31, 2007 from 39.3% for
the comparable period in 2006. The increase in transaction and
clearing fees was primarily due to our acquisitions of ICE
Futures U.S. and ICE Futures Canada on January 12,
2007 and August 27, 2007, respectively, an increase in our
energy futures contract volumes and a transaction fee increase
effective July 1, 2007 for ICE Futures Europe, partially
offset by an increase in the transaction fee rebates for certain
futures contracts. Futures contract volumes increased for ICE
Futures Europe primarily due to increased liquidity brought by
new market participants due to electronic trading and increased
trading of the ICE WTI Crude futures contract, which was
launched in February 2006. Volumes at ICE Futures Europe
increased 49.3% to 138.5 million contracts traded during
the year ended December 31, 2007 from 92.7 million
contracts traded during the comparable period in 2006. ICE
Futures U.S. adjusted its exchange fee rates effective
August 1, 2007, including adding a surcharge on certain
electronic trading products. Average transaction and clearing
fees per trading day for our futures business segment increased
132.7% to $1.1 million per trading day for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from $482,000 per trading day for the
comparable period in 2006.
Transaction fees generated in our OTC business segment increased
$61.6 million, or 41.0%, to $211.8 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007 from $150.2 million for
the comparable period in 2006, primarily due to increased
trading volumes. Transaction fees in this segment, as a
percentage of consolidated revenues, decreased to 36.9% for the
year ended December 31, 2007 from 47.9% for the comparable
period in 2006. The decline in the percentage of consolidated
revenues is due to the inclusion of the ICE Futures
U.S. and ICE Futures Canada revenues in 2007 after their
acquisitions. The number of transactions or trades executed in
our OTC business segment increased by 55.8% to 5.9 million
trades for the year ended December 31, 2007 from
3.8 million trades for the comparable period in 2006.
Average transaction fees per trading day for our OTC business
segment increased 43.5% to $845,000 per trading day for the year
ended December 31, 2007 from $589,000 per trading day for
the comparable period in 2006.
Increased volumes in our OTC business segment were primarily due
to increased trading activity in North American natural gas
and power markets as a result of the availability of cleared OTC
contracts, as well as increased liquidity brought by new market
participants and increased volatility relating to geopolitical
events, real and perceived supply and demand imbalances and
weather. Transaction fees generated by trading in North American
natural gas contracts increased $38.2 million, or 32.6%, to
$155.5 million for year ended December 31, 2007 from
$117.3 million for the comparable period in 2006. In
addition, transaction fees generated by trading in North
American power contracts increased $16.1 million, or 59.2%,
to $43.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2007
from $27.2 million for the comparable period in 2006. The
continued growth in trading volumes in OTC contracts can be
attributed in part to the continued introduction and use of
cleared OTC contracts, which eliminates the need for a
counterparty to post capital against each trade and also reduces
requirements for entering into multiple negotiated bilateral
settlement agreements to enable trading with other
counterparties.
Revenues derived from electronic trade confirmation fees in our
OTC business segment increased $2.5 million, or 71.3%, to
$6.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 from
$3.5 million for the comparable period in 2006.
Consolidated electronic trade confirmation fees, as a percentage
of consolidated revenues, were 1.0% for the year ended
December 31, 2007 compared to 1.1% for the comparable
period in 2006.
Market
Data Fees
Consolidated market data fees increased $36.2 million, or
105.6%, to $70.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from $34.2 million for the
comparable period in 2006. This increase was primarily due to
the
73
new terminal fees and license fees that we receive from data
vendors derived from ICE Futures U.S. following our
acquisition, increased data access fees in our OTC markets and
increased terminal fees and license fees that we receive from
data vendors in exchange for the provision of real-time price
information generated from ICE Futures Europe. During the year
ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, we recognized
$28.9 million and $17.6 million, respectively, in data
access fees and terminal fees in our energy futures and OTC
businesses. During the year ended December 31, 2007 and
2006, we recognized $13.5 million and $11.5 million,
respectively, in terminal and license fees from data vendors in
our energy futures business. The increase in the market data
fees received from data vendors in our energy futures business
was due to both an increase in the average fee per terminal and
an increase in the number of terminals. We recognized
$20.9 million in terminal and license fees from data
vendors of ICE Futures U.S. during the year ended
December 31, 2007. ICE Futures U.S. adjusted its
market data rates effective June 1, 2007. Consolidated
market data fees, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, were
12.3% for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to
10.9% for the comparable period in 2006.
Other
Revenues
Consolidated other revenues increased $7.6 million to
$13.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007
from $5.9 million for the comparable period in 2006. This
increase was primarily due to trade registration system fees of
$2.0 million recognized during the year ended
December 31, 2007 and $6.0 million in other revenues
relating to ICE Futures U.S. Other revenues for ICE Futures
U.S. include certification fees, grading fees, booth fees
and broker telephone billing fees. Consolidated other revenues,
as a percentage of consolidated revenues, were 2.4% for the year
ended December 31, 2007 compared to 1.9% for the comparable
period in 2006.
Expenses
Compensation
and Benefits
Consolidated compensation and benefits expenses increased
$51.6 million, or 103.8%, to $101.4 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007 from $49.8 million for
the comparable period in 2006. This increase was primarily due
to the inclusion of $25.9 million in compensation and
benefits expenses relating to ICE Futures U.S. in our
consolidated results for the year ended December 31, 2007,
an increase in non-cash compensation expenses and an increase in
our employee headcount. The non-cash compensation expenses
recognized in our consolidated financial statements for our
stock options and restricted stock were $23.6 million for
the year ended December 31, 2007 as compared to
$8.8 million for the comparable period in 2006. This
increase was primarily due to non-cash compensation costs
recognized for the performance-based restricted stock that was
granted in December 2006. Our employee headcount increased from
226 employees as of December 31, 2006 to
277 employees as of December 31, 2007 (excluding the
employees acquired as a result of our acquisitions). ICE Futures
U.S. employee headcount decreased from 282 employees
as of January 12, 2007, the acquisition date, to
198 employees as of December 31, 2007. We had an
additional 31 employees as of December 31, 2007
relating to the other four acquisitions. Consolidated
compensation and benefits expenses, as a percentage of
consolidated revenues, were 17.7% for year ended
December 31, 2007 compared to 15.9% for the comparable
period in 2006.
Professional
Services
Consolidated professional services expenses increased
$11.7 million, or 102.3%, to $23.0 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007 from $11.4 million for
the comparable period in 2006. This increase was primarily due
to the inclusion of $6.0 million in ICE Futures
U.S. professional services expenses in our consolidated
results for the year ended December 31, 2007 and
$3.5 million in professional services expenses incurred
relating to the establishment of ICE Clear Europe. Consolidated
professional services expenses, as a percentage of consolidated
revenues, were 4.0% for the year ended December 31, 2007
compared to 3.6% for the comparable period in 2006.
Patent
Royalty
Patent royalty expenses decreased $7.3 million to
$1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 from
$9.0 million for the comparable period in 2006.
Consolidated patent royalty expenses, as a percentage of
consolidated revenues, were 0.3% for the year ended
December 31, 2007 versus 2.9% for the comparable
74
period in 2006. The patent licensing agreement terminated on
February 20, 2007 and there were no patent royalty expenses
after this date.
CBOT
Merger-Related Transaction Costs
CBOT merger-related transaction costs were $11.1 million
for the year ended December 31, 2007. Consolidated CBOT
merger-related transaction costs, as a percentage of
consolidated revenues, were 1.9% for the year ended
December 31, 2007. We did not incur any CBOT merger-related
transaction costs during the year ended December 31, 2006.
Selling,
General and Administrative
Consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses
increased $25.5 million, or 100.9%, to $50.8 million
for the year ended December 31, 2007 from
$25.3 million for the comparable period in 2006. This
increase was primarily due to $19.1 million of selling,
general and administrative expenses related to the business of
ICE Futures U.S. and increased costs of hosting expenses,
hardware and software support, marketing expenses and rent
expense that resulted from the growth of our business. We have
begun to relocate our technology operations and our support
systems, including our primary data center and our disaster
recovery site, to Chicago. Our disaster recovery site was
relocated from London to Chicago in June 2007. The primary data
center migrated from Atlanta to Chicago in January 2008.
Therefore, we have incurred some redundant costs at our
technology facilities in Atlanta, London and Chicago during this
transition period. Consolidated selling, general and
administrative expenses, as a percentage of consolidated
revenues, were 8.8% for the year ended December 31, 2007
compared to 8.1% for the comparable period in 2006.
Depreciation
and Amortization
Consolidated depreciation and amortization expenses increased
$19.0 million, or 138.5%, to $32.7 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007 from $13.7 million for
the comparable period in 2006. This increase was primarily due
to the amortization on the acquired ICE Futures
U.S. intangibles of $8.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007, the depreciation on the
$43.3 million in fixed asset additions incurred during the
year ended December 31, 2007 and the inclusion of
$4.5 million in ICE Futures U.S. depreciation expenses
in our consolidated results for the year ended December 31,
2007. Consolidated depreciation and amortization expenses, as a
percentage of consolidated revenues, were 5.7% for the year
ended December 31, 2007 compared to 4.4% for the comparable
period in 2006.
Other
Income (Expense)
Consolidated other income decreased $3.0 million to
$4.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 from
$7.9 million for the comparable period in 2006. This
decrease primarily related to the increase in interest expense,
partially offset by the gain recognized on the sale of an asset
and an increase in interest income. Interest expense increased
$18.4 million to $18.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from $231,000 for the comparable period
in 2006 primarily due to $15.1 million in interest expense
and amortization associated with our $500.0 million credit
facility and interest expense of $3.1 million relating to
the Russell License. We recognized a gain of $9.3 million
during the year ended December 31, 2007 on the sale of our
former disaster recovery site used for our former open-outcry
physical trading floor in London. Interest income increased
$3.3 million to $11.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from $8.6 million for the comparable
period in 2006 primarily due to an increase in our cash balances
from the net cash provided by operations.
Income
Taxes
Consolidated tax expense increased $48.5 million to
$117.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2007
from $69.3 million for the comparable period in 2006,
primarily due to the increase in our pre-tax income. Our
effective tax rate increased to 32.9% for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from 32.6% for the comparable period in
2006, primarily due to higher New York State and City tax rates
associated with the operations of ICE Futures U.S., which were
partially offset by a decrease in the amount of U.S. taxes
accrued on foreign earnings and an increase in tax credits
generated.
75
Quarterly
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth quarterly unaudited condensed
consolidated statements of income for the periods presented. We
believe that this data has been prepared on substantially the
same basis as our audited consolidated financial statements and
includes all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of our
consolidated results of operations for the quarters presented.
This unaudited condensed consolidated quarterly data should be
read together with our consolidated financial statements and
related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The historical results for any quarter do not necessarily
indicate the results expected for any future period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2008(1)
|
|
|
2008(2)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007(3)
|
|
|
2007(4)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction fees, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICE Brent Crude futures
|
|
$
|
24,470
|
|
|
$
|
21,583
|
|
|
$
|
23,809
|
|
|
$
|
23,109
|
|
|
$
|
21,320
|
|
|
$
|
22,071
|
|
|
$
|
21,796
|
|
|
$
|
22,121
|
|
ICE WTI Crude futures
|
|
|
11,352
|
|
|
|
10,837
|
|
|
|
12,722
|
|
|
|
13,030
|
|
|
|
12,592
|
|
|
|
12,791
|
|
|
|
11,889
|
|
|
|
12,670
|
|
ICE Gas Oil futures
|
|
|
11,440
|
|
|
|
10,740
|
|
|
|
9,532
|
|
|
|
10,929
|
|
|
|
10,599
|
|
|
|
10,051
|
|
|
|
7,911
|
|
|
|
8,329
|
|
Sugar futures and options
|
|
|
11,864
|
|
|
|
17,345
|
|
|
|
21,491
|
|
|
|
26,248
|
|
|
|
12,160
|
|
|
|
12,829
|
|
|
|
14,823
|
|
|
|
8,835
|
|
Cotton futures and options
|
|
|
3,595
|
|
|
|
3,998
|
|
|
|
6,281
|
|
|
|
9,297
|
|
|
|
4,992
|
|
|
|
4,920
|
|
|
|
5,032
|
|
|
|
2,976
|
|
Russell index futures and options
|
|
|
9,023
|
|
|
|
4,269
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
Other futures products and options
|
|
|
13,947
|
|
|
|
12,563
|
|
|
|
13,129
|
|
|
|
14,650
|
|
|
|
10,556
|
|
|
|
10,522
|
|
|
|
9,224
|
|
|
|
7,042
|
|
OTC:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American natural gas
|
|
|
40,090
|
|
|
|
55,171
|
|
|
|
59,076
|
|
|
|
60,066
|
|
|
|
43,410
|
|
|
|
41,665
|
|
|
|
34,275
|
|
|
|
36,183
|
|
North American power
|
|
|
14,177
|
|
|
|
14,364
|
|
|
|
16,157
|
|
|
|
15,702
|
|
|
|
12,627
|
|
|
|
12,212
|
|
|
|
9,713
|
|
|
|
8,797
|
|
Credit derivative swaps
|
|
|
35,537
|
|
|
|
16,561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other commodities markets
|
|
|
1,570
|
|
|
|
1,758
|
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
2,326
|
|
|
|
2,393
|
|
|
|
2,199
|
|
|
|
1,237
|
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
Electronic trade confirmation services
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
|
|
1,786
|
|
|
|
2,041
|
|
|
|
1,953
|
|
|
|
1,725
|
|
|
|
1,681
|
|
|
|
1,362
|
|
|
|
1,242
|
|
Market data fees
|
|
|
26,960
|
|
|
|
25,771
|
|
|
|
25,493
|
|
|
|
24,720
|
|
|
|
23,306
|
|
|
|
17,225
|
|
|
|
15,846
|
|
|
|
14,019
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,142
|
|
|
|
4,698
|
|
|
|
5,003
|
|
|
|
5,062
|
|
|
|
3,435
|
|
|
|
3,420
|
|
|
|
3,436
|
|
|
|
3,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
207,260
|
|
|
|
201,444
|
|
|
|
197,160
|
|
|
|
207,214
|
|
|
|
159,296
|
|
|
|
151,735
|
|
|
|
136,654
|
|
|
|
126,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
|
57,004
|
|
|
|
41,186
|
|
|
|
30,923
|
|
|
|
30,679
|
|
|
|
34,913
|
|
|
|
23,009
|
|
|
|
21,717
|
|
|
|
21,758
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
6,716
|
|
|
|
9,089
|
|
|
|
6,928
|
|
|
|
6,972
|
|
|
|
4,820
|
|
|
|
6,650
|
|
|
|
6,714
|
|
|
|
4,863
|
|
Patent royalty
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,705
|
|
CBOT merger-related transaction costs(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
10,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
20,157
|
|
|
|
17,626
|
|
|
|
15,680
|
|
|
|
14,337
|
|
|
|
13,457
|
|
|
|
12,170
|
|
|
|
13,002
|
|
|
|
12,130
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
26,056
|
|
|
|
14,401
|
|
|
|
10,844
|
|
|
|
10,946
|
|
|
|
9,546
|
|
|
|
8,898
|
|
|
|
7,748
|
|
|
|
6,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
109,933
|
|
|
|
82,302
|
|
|
|
64,375
|
|
|
|
62,934
|
|
|
|
62,769
|
|
|
|
50,871
|
|
|
|
60,125
|
|
|
|
46,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
97,327
|
|
|
|
119,142
|
|
|
|
132,785
|
|
|
|
144,280
|
|
|
|
96,527
|
|
|
|
100,864
|
|
|
|
76,529
|
|
|
|
79,643
|
|
Other income (expense), net(4)(1)
|
|
|
(16,171
|
)
|
|
|
(860
|
)
|
|
|
(1,146
|
)
|
|
|
(1,861
|
)
|
|
|
(438
|
)
|
|
|
(1,590
|
)
|
|
|
(1,322
|
)
|
|
|
8,221
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
32,301
|
|
|
|
43,319
|
|
|
|
46,775
|
|
|
|
50,129
|
|
|
|
31,437
|
|
|
|
32,593
|
|
|
|
21,514
|
|
|
|
32,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income(1)
|
|
$
|
48,855
|
|
|
$
|
74,963
|
|
|
$
|
84,864
|
|
|
$
|
92,290
|
|
|
$
|
64,652
|
|
|
$
|
66,681
|
|
|
$
|
53,693
|
|
|
$
|
55,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The financial results for the three months ended
December 31, 2008 include an impairment loss on the NCDEX
cost method investment of $15.7 million, which was recorded
as other expense. For additional information, refer to
note 6 to our consolidated financial statements and related
notes, which are included |
76
|
|
|
|
|
elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Excluding this charge, net of taxes, our consolidated net income
for the three months ended December 31, 2008 would have
been $60.1 million. See also
Non-GAAP Financial Measures below. |
|
(2) |
|
The financial results for the three months ended September, 2008
include the results of Creditex for the period from
September 1, 2008 to September 30, 2008, following the
acquisition of Creditex on August 29, 2008. |
|
(3) |
|
The financial results for the three months ended June 30,
2007 include $10.9 million in CBOT merger-related
transaction costs, or $7.1 million after tax. |
|
(4) |
|
The financial results for the three months ended March 31,
2007 include the results of ICE Futures U.S. for the period from
January 13, 2007 to March 31, 2007 and also include a
gain of $9.3 million, or $5.8 million after tax,
relating to the sale our former open-outcry disaster recovery
site in London. |
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Since our inception, we have financed our operations, growth and
cash needs primarily through income from operations and
borrowings under our credit facilities. Our principal capital
requirements have been to fund capital expenditures, working
capital, strategic acquisitions and investments, and the
development of our electronic trading platforms. We financed the
cash portion of our merger with ICE Futures U.S. in 2007
with cash on hand and borrowings under a senior unsecured credit
facility discussed below. We financed the other acquisitions we
made in 2007 and 2008 with a combination of stock and cash on
hand. We financed the stock repurchases under the stock
repurchase plan during the year ended December 31, 2008
with cash on hand and borrowings under the senior unsecured
credit facility. We believe that cash on hand and cash flows
from operations will be sufficient to repay our outstanding
indebtedness as it matures. In the future, we may need to incur
additional debt or issue additional equity in connection with
our strategic acquisitions or investments. See also
Future Capital Requirements below.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents, Short-Term and Long-Term Investments and
Short-Term and Long-Term Restricted Cash
We had consolidated cash and cash equivalents of
$283.5 million and $119.6 million as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. We had
$6.5 million and $141.0 million in short-term and
long-term investments as of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, and $136.5 million and $22.6 million in
short-term and long-term restricted cash as of December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively. We consider all short-term, highly
liquid investments with remaining maturity dates of three months
or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. We
classify all investments with original maturity dates in excess
of three months and with maturities less than one year as
short-term investments. We classify all investments that we
intend to hold for more than one year as long-term investments.
We classify all cash that is not available for general use,
either due to FSA requirements or through restrictions in
specific agreements, as restricted cash. For a discussion of the
increase in the restricted cash balances and a decrease in our
investments balances, refer to notes 4 and 5 to our
consolidated financial statements and related notes included
elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
We invest a portion of our cash in excess of short-term
operating needs in investment-grade marketable debt securities,
foreign and domestic government securities, equity securities
and municipal bonds through a third party asset management
company. We classify these investments as available-for-sale in
accordance with SFAS 115, Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.
Available-for-sale investments are carried at their fair
values with unrealized gains and losses, net of deferred income
taxes, reported as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income. Realized gains and losses, and declines in
value deemed to be other-than-temporary on available-for-sale
investments, are recognized currently in earnings. We do not
have any investments classified as held-to-maturity or trading.
We have entered into an agreement with a third party asset
management company to manage our cash over a predetermined
operating cash threshold for an agreed upon fee. The agreement
specifies our investment objectives, as well as guidelines for
and restrictions on investments. The investment objectives are
to preserve
77
principal value, invest in high-quality investment grade
securities, to maintain adequate liquidity to meet account
demands and to maximize income. The investments guidelines limit
the types of investments that the third party asset management
company can enter into based on pre-approved guidelines relating
to types of securities, amount of investments and maturity.
Cash
Flow
The following tables present, for the periods indicated, the
major components of net increases (decreases) in cash and cash
equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
375,112
|
|
|
$
|
287,781
|
|
|
$
|
150,689
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(69,746
|
)
|
|
|
(637,388
|
)
|
|
|
(27,628
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(141,119
|
)
|
|
|
264,759
|
|
|
|
58,339
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes
|
|
|
(322
|
)
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
2,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
163,925
|
|
|
$
|
(84,660
|
)
|
|
$
|
184,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Activities
Consolidated net cash provided by operating activities was
$375.1 million, $287.8 million and $150.7 million
for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. Net cash provided by operating activities
primarily consists of net income adjusted for certain non-cash
items, including depreciation and amortization and the effects
of changes in working capital. Fluctuations in net cash provided
by operating activities are primarily attributable to increases
and decreases in our net income between periods and, to a lesser
extent, due to fluctuations in working capital. The
$87.3 million increase in net cash provided by operating
activities for the year ended December 31, 2008 from the
comparable period in 2007 is primarily due to the
$30.3 million increase in the futures business
segments net income, the $16.4 million increase in
the market data business segments net income and the
$13.7 million increase in the OTC business segments
net income for the year ended December 31, 2008 from the
comparable period in 2007. The $137.1 million increase in
net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from the comparable period in 2006 is
primarily due to the $21.8 million increase in the market
data business segments net income and the
$73.9 million increase in the futures business
segments net income for the year ended December 31,
2007 from the comparable period in 2006.
Investing
Activities
Consolidated net cash used in investing activities was
$69.7 million, $637.4 million and $27.6 million
for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. These activities primarily relate to cash paid for
acquisitions and other intangibles, sales and purchases of
available-for-sale investments, changes in the restricted stock
balances and capital expenditures in each period for software,
including internally developed software, and for computer and
network equipment. The cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash
acquired, for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
were $44.6 million and $480.1 million, respectively,
and we paid $52.7 million for the purchase of the Russell
licensing agreement during the year ended December 31,
2007. We had a net decrease (increase) in investments classified
as available-for-sale of $134.4 million,
($59.6 million) and $36.9 million for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and a net
increase in restricted cash of $106.1 million,
$6.4 million and $3.6 million, respectively, due to
changes in the restricted cash balances between periods. The
increase in the restricted cash balance during the year ended
December 31, 2008 primarily relates to the
$100.0 million restricted for the ICE Clear Europe guaranty
fund. We incurred capitalized software development costs of
$18.3 million, $12.3 million and $7.4 million
million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and
2006, respectively. Capital expenditures totaled
$30.5 million, $31.0 million and $12.4 million
for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
78
respectively. These capital expenditures primarily relate to
hardware purchases to continue the development and expansion of
our electronic platforms, our new London office and physical
relocation of our primary data center and disaster recovery
sites in January 2008.
Financing
Activities
Consolidated net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
was ($141.1 million), $264.8 million and
$58.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006, respectively. Consolidated net cash used in
financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2008
primarily relates to $300.0 million used to finance stock
repurchases under a $500.0 million stock repurchase program
approved by our board of directors, $46.0 million in cash
payments related to treasury shares received for restricted
stock and stock option tax payments and $37.5 million of
borrowing repaid under our credit facilities, partially offset
by $195.0 million in additional borrowings under our credit
facilities to finance a portion of the stock repurchases and
$44.1 million in excess tax benefits from stock-based
compensation. Consolidated net cash provided by financing
activities for the year ended December 31, 2007 primarily
relates to the $250.0 million in proceeds received from
borrowings under the credit agreement and $60.8 million in
excess tax benefits generated from stock-based compensation,
partially offset by $25.5 million in cash payments related
to treasury shares received for restricted stock and stock
option tax payments as well as $28.1 million in repayments
under the credit agreement. Consolidated net cash provided by
financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2006
primarily relates to the $41.0 million excess tax benefits
from stock-based compensation and $22.0 million in proceeds
from the exercise of common stock options.
Loan
Agreements
We financed the cash portion of the ICE Futures
U.S. acquisition with cash on hand and borrowings under a
senior unsecured credit facility dated January 12, 2007,
which we refer to in this report as our credit facilities. The
credit facilities provide for a term loan facility in the
aggregate principal amount of $250.0 million and a
revolving credit facility in the aggregate principal amount of
$250.0 million. We used the proceeds of the
$250.0 million term loan along with $166.8 million of
cash on hand to finance the $416.8 million cash component
of the ICE Futures U.S. acquisition. Under the terms of the
credit facilities, we can borrow an aggregate principal amount
of up to $250.0 million under the revolving credit facility
at any time until its termination on January 12, 2010. We
have agreed to reserve $50.0 million of the
$250.0 million available under the revolving credit
facility for use by ICE Clear U.S. to provide short-term
liquidity, if necessary, in the event of a default by a clearing
member. During the three months ended September 30, 2008,
we borrowed $195.0 million of the amount available under
the revolving credit facility which, combined with
$105.0 million of cash on hand, was used to make
$300.0 million in stock repurchases. For a discussion of
the stock repurchase program, refer to note 10 to our
consolidated financial statements and related notes included
elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The remaining amount under the revolving credit facility, which
is $5.0 million after factoring in the $50.0 million
reserved for ICE Clear U.S., could be used by us for general
corporate purposes.
As of December 31, 2008, we had outstanding borrowings
under the credit facilities of $379.4 million, representing
a $184.4 million outstanding six month LIBOR loan under the
term loan facility with a stated interest rate of 2.44% per
annum and a $195.0 million six month LIBOR loan outstanding
under the revolving credit facility with a stated interest rate
of 3.73% per annum. For outstanding borrowings under the term
loan facility, we began making payments on June 30, 2007,
and will make payments quarterly thereafter until
January 12, 2012, the fifth anniversary of the closing date
of the acquisition of ICE Futures U.S. For outstanding
borrowings under the revolving credit facility, all amounts
outstanding must be repaid on January 12, 2010. The credit
facilities include an unutilized revolving credit commitment
that is equal to the unused maximum revolver amount multiplied
by an applicable margin rate and is payable in arrears on a
quarterly basis. The credit facilities require us to use 100% of
the net cash proceeds raised from debt issuances or asset
dispositions, with certain limited exceptions, to prepay
outstanding loans under the credit facilities. With limited
exceptions, we may prepay the outstanding loans under the credit
facilities, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty. The
credit facilities contain affirmative and negative covenants,
including, but not
79
limited to, leverage and interest coverage ratios, as well as
limitations or required approvals for acquisitions, dispositions
of assets and certain investments, the incurrence of additional
debt or the creation of liens and other fundamental changes to
our business. We have been and are currently in compliance with
all applicable covenants under the credit facilities.
On June 27, 2008, we entered into a separate senior
unsecured credit agreement, or the credit agreement, which
provides for a
364-day
revolving credit facility in the aggregate principal amount of
$150.0 million, which may be increased to
$200.0 million under certain conditions. The credit
agreement is available for operational use solely by ICE Clear
Europe. No amounts are outstanding under the credit agreement as
of December 31, 2008. The credit agreement contains
affirmative and negative covenants, including, but not limited
to, leverage and interest coverage ratios, as well as
limitations or required approvals for acquisitions, dispositions
of assets and certain investments, the incurrence of additional
debt or the creation of liens and other fundamental changes to
our business. We have been and are currently in compliance with
all applicable covenants under the credit agreement.
Future
Capital Requirements
Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors,
including the rate of our trading volume growth, required
technology initiatives, regulatory compliance costs, the timing
and introduction of new products and enhancements to existing
products, and the continuing market acceptance of our electronic
platform. We currently expect to make aggregate capital
expenditures ranging between $30 million and
$40 million in 2009, which we believe will support the
enhancement of our technology and the continued expansion of our
futures, OTC and market data businesses. We believe that our
cash flows from operations will be sufficient to fund our
working capital needs and capital expenditure requirements at
least through the end of 2010. We expect our capitalized
software development costs to remain relatively consistent with
our 2008 capitalized software development costs.
We currently have $5.0 million available under our
revolving credit facility which could be used by us for general
corporate purposes, after factoring in the $50.0 million
reserved for ICE Clear U.S. The revolving credit facility
is currently the only significant agreement or arrangement that
we have with third parties to provide us with sources of
liquidity and capital resources other than the revolving credit
facility in the aggregate principal amount of
$150.0 million which is available for operational use
solely by ICE Clear Europe. In the event that we consummate any
strategic acquisitions or investments, or if we are required to
raise capital for any reason, we may need to incur additional
debt or issue additional equity to help raise the necessary
funds. However, we cannot provide assurance that such financing
will be available or that the terms of such financing will be
favorable to us, particularly given prevailing economic
conditions and disruptions in the credit markets.
Off-Balance
Sheet Entities
We currently do not have any relationships with unconsolidated
entities or financial partnerships, often referred to as
structured finance or special purpose entities, which have been
established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet
arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
80
Contractual
Obligations and Commercial Commitments
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, our
contractual obligations (which we intend to fund from
operations) and commercial commitments as of December 31,
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
4-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and interest
|
|
$
|
397,471
|
|
|
$
|
57,837
|
|
|
$
|
320,743
|
|
|
$
|
18,891
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Russell licensing agreement
|
|
|
107,159
|
|
|
|
14,400
|
|
|
|
38,016
|
|
|
|
54,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating and capital leases
|
|
|
72,125
|
|
|
|
15,737
|
|
|
|
28,649
|
|
|
|
22,238
|
|
|
|
5,501
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
48,266
|
|
|
|
24,766
|
|
|
|
18,500
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations
|
|
$
|
625,021
|
|
|
$
|
112,740
|
|
|
$
|
405,908
|
|
|
$
|
97,872
|
|
|
$
|
8,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have excluded from the contractual obligations and commercial
commitments table above $12.1 billion in margin deposits
and guaranty funds liabilities. Clearing members of ICE Clear
Europe, ICE Clear U.S. and ICE Clear Canada are required to
deposit original margin and variation margin and to make
deposits to a guaranty fund. The cash deposits made to these
margin accounts and to the guaranty fund are recorded in the
consolidated balance sheet as current assets with offsetting
current liabilities to the clearing members that deposited them.
See Note 14 to our consolidation financial statements and
related notes that are included elsewhere in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.
We have also excluded from the contractual obligations and
commercial commitments table above $12.6 million in
uncertain tax liabilities that are expected to be reversed
within the next five years. Of this amount, $4.7 million is
expected to be settled within the next year, $7.1 million
is expected to be settled in the next two to three years and
$785,000 is expected to be settled in the next four to five
years. The anticipated reduction in the balance of the liability
is due primarily to the anticipated expiration of the applicable
statute of limitations. At this time, we are not able to
determine which portion, if any, of the uncertain tax benefits
will be settled by means of a cash payment so it has not been
included in the table above.
Non-GAAP Financial
Measures
We provide adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per common
share as additional information regarding our operating results.
We use these non-GAAP measures internally to evaluate our
performance and in making financial and operational decisions.
We believe that our presentation of these measures provides
investors with greater transparency and supplemental data
relating to our financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, we believe the presentation of these measures is
useful for period-to-period comparison of results because the
NCDEX cost method impairment charge described below does not
reflect historical operating performance. These measures are not
in accordance with, or an alternative to, U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles or GAAP, and may be different
from non-GAAP measures used by other companies. Investors should
not rely on any single financial measure when evaluating our
business. We strongly recommend that investors review the GAAP
financial measures included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
including our consolidated financial statements and the notes
thereto.
When viewed in conjunction with our GAAP results and the
accompanying reconciliation, we believe adjusted net income and
adjusted earnings per share provides a more complete
understanding of factors affecting our business than GAAP
measures alone. Our management uses adjusted net income and
adjusted earnings per share to evaluate operating performance
and management decisions made during the reporting period by
excluding certain items that we believe have less significance
on the day-to-day performance of our business. Our internal
budgets are based on adjusted net income and adjusted earnings
per share, and we report our adjusted net income and adjusted
earnings per share to our board of directors. In addition,
adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per share are among
the criteria used in determining performance-based compensation.
We understand that analysts and investors regularly rely on
non-GAAP financial measures, such as adjusted net income and
adjusted earnings per share, to assess operating performance. We
use adjusted net
81
income and adjusted earnings per share because they more clearly
highlight trends in our business that may not otherwise be
apparent when relying solely on GAAP financial measures, since
adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per share eliminates
from our results specific financial items that have less bearing
on our operating performance.
Adjusted net income for the 2008 periods below is calculated by
adding net income and the NCDEX impairment charge, presented net
of tax. We do not believe this item is representative of our
future operating performance since the charge was not consistent
with our historical operations. We believe that the NCDEX
impairment charge is an unusual expense and is not
representative of historical operating performance. Adjusted
earnings per common share is calculated as adjusted net income
divided by the weighted average common shares outstanding. These
calculations exclude the NCDEX impairment charge. The following
table reconciles our 2008 net income for the periods
presented to adjusted net income and calculates adjusted
earnings per common share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTC
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
300,972
|
|
|
$
|
48,855
|
|
|
$
|
92,879
|
|
Add: NCDEX impairment charge
|
|
|
15,700
|
|
|
|
15,700
|
|
|
|
15,700
|
|
Less: Income tax benefit of NCDEX impairment charge
|
|
|
(4,477
|
)
|
|
|
(4,477
|
)
|
|
|
(4,477
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net income
|
|
$
|
312,195
|
|
|
$
|
60,078
|
|
|
$
|
104,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share on net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
4.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
4.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted earnings per common share on adjusted net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted basic
|
|
$
|
4.39
|
|
|
$
|
0.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted diluted
|
|
$
|
4.33
|
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
71,184
|
|
|
|
72,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
72,164
|
|
|
|
73,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recently
Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or
FASB, issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands
fair value measurement disclosures. SFAS No. 157
became effective for us beginning in fiscal year 2008. Our
adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material
impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities including an Amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115, which permits entities to choose to measure
certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair
value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair
value option has been elected are reported in earnings.
SFAS No. 159 became effective for us beginning in
fiscal year 2008. Our adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not
have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141 (revised
2007), Business Combinations, or
SFAS No. 141(R). SFAS No. 141(R) will
significantly change the accounting for business combinations.
Under SFAS No. 141(R), an acquiring entity will be
required to recognize all the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with
limited exceptions. SFAS No. 141(R) will change the
accounting treatment for certain specific acquisition
82
related items including expensing acquisition related costs as
incurred, valuing non-controlling interests at fair value at the
acquisition date and expensing restructuring costs associated
with an acquired business. SFAS No. 141(R) also
includes a substantial number of new disclosure requirements.
SFAS No. 141(R) is to be applied prospectively to
business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or
after January 1, 2009. We expect that
SFAS No. 141(R) will have an impact on our accounting
for future business combinations once adopted but the extent of
the impact is dependent upon the size, complexity and number of
acquisitions that are made in the future. In addition, as of
December 31, 2008, we have included deferred acquisition
costs of $2.2 million in our consolidated balance sheet
related to the expected 2009 acquisition of The Clearing
Corporation. These deferred costs will be expensed upon our
adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) on January 1, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements-an amendment of ARB No. 51.
SFAS No. 160 amends ARB No. 51 to establish and
improve accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 also
changes the way the consolidated income statement is presented,
establishes a single method of accounting for changes in a
parents ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not
result in deconsolidation, requires that a parent recognize a
gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated,
and expands disclosures in the consolidated financial statements
in order to clearly identify and distinguish between the
interests of the parents owners and the interest of the
noncontrolling owners of a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 is
effective for our 2009 fiscal year. We do not expect that the
adoption of SFAS No. 160 will have a material impact
on our consolidated financial statements.
Critical
Accounting Policies
We have identified the policies below as critical to our
business operations and the understanding of our results of
operations. The impact of, and any associated risks related to,
these policies on our business operations is discussed
throughout Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations. For a
detailed discussion on the application of these and other
accounting policies, see note 2 to our consolidated
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial
statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with these
accounting principles requires us to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and
liabilities, and the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities, at the date of our financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period.
We evaluate our estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis,
including those related to the accounting matters described
below. We base our estimates and judgments on our historical
experience and other factors that we believe to be reasonable
under the circumstances when we make these estimates and
judgments. Based on these factors, we make estimates and
judgments about, among other things, the carrying values of
assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from market
prices or other independent sources and about the recognition
and characterization of our revenues and expenses. The values
and results based on these estimates and judgments could differ
significantly under different assumptions or conditions and
could change materially in the future.
We believe that the following critical accounting policies,
among others, affect our more significant judgments and
estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial
statements and could materially increase or decrease our
reported results, assets and liabilities.
Goodwill
and Other Identifiable Intangible Assets
We have significant intangible assets related to goodwill and
other acquired intangibles. Our determination of the fair value
of the intangible assets, related estimated useful lives of
intangible assets and whether or not these assets are impaired
requires us to make significant judgments. If we change our
strategy or if market conditions shift, our judgments may
change, which may result in adjustments to recorded asset
balances. As of December 31, 2008, we had goodwill of
$1,434.8 million and net other intangible assets of
$728.9 million relating to our acquisitions, our purchase
of trademarks and Internet domain names from various third
parties,
83
and the Russell licensing agreement. Under the provisions of
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, we do not amortize goodwill or other intangible
assets with indefinite useful lives. Intangible assets with
finite useful lives are amortized over the lesser of their
contractual or estimated useful lives.
In connection with our acquisitions, assets acquired and
liabilities assumed are recorded at their estimated fair values.
We have recorded goodwill for the excess of the purchase price
of our acquisitions over the fair value of identifiable net
assets acquired, including other identified intangible assets.
We recognize specifically identifiable intangibles when a
specific right or contract is acquired. Our fair value
assumptions are based on managements judgment and require
the use of significant estimates and assumptions regarding
estimated future cash flows. In performing the purchase price
allocation, we consider, among other factors, the intended
future use of acquired assets, analyses of historical financial
performance and estimates of future performance of the acquired
business.
At the acquisition date, a preliminary allocation of the
purchase price is recorded based upon a preliminary valuation.
We continue to review and validate estimates, assumptions and
valuation methodologies underlying the preliminary valuation
during the purchase price allocation period. Accordingly, these
estimates and assumptions are subject to change, which could
have a material impact on our financial statements. The purchase
price allocation period ends when we have obtained all of the
information and that is known to be obtainable, which usually
does not exceed one year from the date of acquisition.
We test goodwill in each of our reporting units for impairment
at least annually in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 142 by comparing the carrying value of the
reporting unit with its estimated fair value. If the carrying
value of the reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value,
then an impairment loss is recorded if and to the extent that
the carrying value of the goodwill is in excess of the implied
fair value of the goodwill in accordance with the two-step
process in SFAS No. 142. Other finite-lived intangible
assets are evaluated for impairment under
SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. Under SFAS No. 144,
we are required to evaluate whether events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value of our
depreciable assets to be held and used may not be recoverable.
An estimate of undiscounted future cash flows produced by these
long-lived assets is then compared to the carrying value of
those assets to determine if the asset is recoverable. If an
asset is not recoverable, the loss is measured as the difference
between fair value and carrying value of the impaired asset.
Fair value of an asset is based on various valuation techniques,
including discounted cash flow analyses.
In assessing whether goodwill and other intangible assets are
impaired, we must make assumptions regarding estimated future
cash flows, estimated long-term growth rates of our business,
the period over which cash flows will occur, and other factors
to determine the fair value of our assets. These estimates and
assumptions require managements judgment, and changes to
these estimates and assumptions could materially affect the
determination of fair value
and/or
impairment for each reporting unit. Future events could cause us
to conclude that indications of goodwill or intangible asset
impairment exist. Impairment may result from, among other
things, deterioration in the performance of our business,
adverse market conditions, adverse changes in applicable laws
and regulations, competition, or the sale or disposition of a
reporting unit. Any resulting impairment loss could have a
material adverse impact on our financial condition and results
of operations.
Our goodwill and other indefinite lived intangible assets are
evaluated for impairment annually in our fiscal fourth quarter
or more often if events or changes in circumstances indicate
that value may be impaired. The reporting unit levels for our
impairment testing of goodwill are the OTC reporting unit, The
Creditex reporting unit, the ICE Futures U.S. reporting
unit, the ICE Futures Europe reporting unit, the ICE Futures
Canada reporting unit and the market data reporting unit. This
analysis has not resulted in impairment through December 2008.
Capitalized
Software Development Costs
We capitalize costs related to software developed or obtained
for internal use in accordance with AICPA Statement of Position
98-1,
Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or
Obtained for Internal Use. Costs incurred during the
preliminary project work stage or conceptual stage, such as
determining the performance requirements, system requirements
and data conversion, are expensed as incurred. Costs incurred in
the application development phase, such as coding, testing for
new software and upgrades that result in additional
functionality, are capitalized and are amortized using the
straight-line method over the
84
useful life of the software, not to exceed three years.
Amortization of these capitalized costs begins only when the
software becomes ready for its intended use. Costs incurred
during the post-implementation/operation stage, including
training costs and maintenance costs, are expensed as incurred.
We capitalized internally developed software costs of
$18.3 million, $12.3 million and $7.4 million
during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. Determining whether particular costs incurred are
more properly attributable to the preliminary or conceptual
stage, and thus expensed, or to the application development
phase, and thus capitalized and amortized, depends on subjective
judgments about the nature of the development work, and our
judgments in this regard may differ from those made by other
companies. General and administrative costs related to
developing or obtaining such software are expensed as incurred.
We review our capitalized software development costs and our
other long-lived assets for impairment at each quarterly balance
sheet date and whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of our long-lived assets
should be assessed. Our judgments about impairment are based in
part on subjective assessments of the usefulness of the relevant
software and may differ from comparable assessments made by
others. We have not recorded any impairment charges since our
formation. To analyze recoverability, we estimate undiscounted
net future cash flows over the remaining life of such assets. If
these projected cash flows are less than the carrying amount,
impairment would be recognized, resulting in a write-down of
assets to their estimated fair value with a corresponding charge
to earnings. We believe that our capitalized software
development costs are appropriately valued in our consolidated
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
ITEM 7(A).
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
We are exposed to market risk in the ordinary course of
business. This market risk consists primarily of interest rate
risk associated with our cash and cash equivalents, short-term
and long-term investments, short-term and long-term restricted
cash, current and long-term debt and foreign currency exchange
rate risk.
Interest
Rate Risk
We have exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates
relating to our cash and cash equivalents, short-term and
long-term investments, short-term and long-term restricted cash
and indebtedness. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, our
cash and cash equivalents, short-term and long-term investments
and short-term and long-term restricted cash were
$426.5 million and $283.2 million, respectively, of
which $23.1 million and $16.0 million, respectively,
were denominated in pounds sterling, euros or Canadian dollars.
The remaining investments are denominated in U.S. dollars.
We do not use our investment portfolio for trading or other
speculative purposes. A hypothetical 100 basis point
decrease in long-term interest rates would decrease annual
pre-tax earnings by $4.3 million, assuming no change in the
amount or composition of our cash and cash equivalents,
short-term and long-term investments and short-term and
long-term restricted cash.
As of December 31, 2008, we had $379.4 million in
outstanding indebtedness, which bears interest at fluctuating
rates based on LIBOR and, therefore, subjects us to interest
rate risk. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in
long-term interest rates would decrease annual pre-tax earnings
by $3.8 million, assuming no change in the volume or
composition of our outstanding debt. The interest rates on our
outstanding debt are currently reset on a quarterly or
semi-annual basis.
Foreign
Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We have foreign currency transaction risk related to the
settlement of foreign currency denominated assets, liabilities
and payables that occur through our foreign operations, which
are received in or paid in pounds sterling or euros, due to the
increase or decrease in the period-end foreign currency exchange
rates between periods. We had foreign currency transaction gains
(losses) of $3.1 million, $842,000 and ($288,000) for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively,
primarily attributable to the fluctuations of pounds sterling
and euros relative to the U.S. dollar. The average exchange
rate of pounds sterling to the U.S. dollar increased from
1.8434 for the year ended December 31, 2006 to 2.0020 for
the year ended December 31, 2007 and then decreased to
1.8545 for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Of our consolidated revenues, 3.3%, 1.2% and 7.2% were
denominated in pounds sterling, euros or Canadian dollars for
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. Of our consolidated
85
operating expenses, 20.2%, 15.9% and 29.8% were denominated in
pounds sterling or Canadian dollars for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. As the
pounds sterling, euros or Canadian dollar exchange rate changes,
the U.S. equivalent of revenues and expenses denominated in
foreign currencies changes accordingly. A 10% adverse change in
the underlying foreign currency exchange rates would not have a
significant impact on our financial condition or results of
operations.
As of the second quarter of 2006, we began charging exchange
fees in U.S. dollars rather than in pounds sterling in our
key U.K. futures contracts, including crude oil and heating oil
contracts. Revenues in our businesses are denominated in
U.S. dollars, except with respect to a portion of the sales
through Creditex, all sales through ICE Futures Canada and a
small number of futures contracts at ICE Futures Europe. We may
experience gains or losses from foreign currency transactions in
the future given there are still net assets or net liabilities
and expenses of our U.K. and Canadian subsidiaries that are
denominated in pounds sterling, euros or Canadian dollars. Our
U.K. operations in some instances function as a natural hedge
because we generally hold an equal amount of monetary assets and
liabilities that are denominated in pounds sterling.
The revenues, expenses and financial results of ICE Futures
Europe and the other U.K. subsidiaries have historically been
denominated in pounds sterling, which previously was functional
currency of our U.K. subsidiaries. We had foreign currency
translation risk equal to our net investment in our U.K.
subsidiaries. The financial statements of our U.K. subsidiaries
were translated into U.S. dollars using current rates of
exchange, with gains or losses included in the cumulative
translation adjustment account, a component of
shareholders equity. Effective as of July 1, 2006,
the functional currency of the majority of our U.K. subsidiaries
became the U.S. dollar. The functional currency of an
entity is the currency of the primary economic environment in
which the entity operates. Normally, it is the currency of the
environment in which an entity primarily generates and expends
cash. Once the functional currency of a foreign entity is
determined, that determination should be used consistently
unless significant changes in economic facts and circumstances
indicate clearly that the functional currency has changed. A
change in functional currency should be accounted for
prospectively, and previously issued financial statements should
not be restated for a change in functional currency. In
addition, if the functional currency changes from a foreign
currency to the reporting currency, as is the case with us,
translation adjustments for prior periods should not be removed
from equity and the translated amounts for non-monetary assets
as the end of the prior period become the accounting basis for
those assets in the period of the change and subsequent periods.
The functional currency switched based on various economic
factors and circumstances, including the fact that beginning in
the second quarter of 2006, ICE Futures Europe began to charge
and collect exchange fees in U.S. dollars rather than
pounds sterling in its key futures contracts, including crude
oil and heating oil contracts. We will no longer recognize any
translation adjustments in the consolidated financial statements
subsequent to June 30, 2006 for those U.K. subsidiaries
that have switched their functional currency to the
U.S. dollar.
In connection with our acquisition of ICE Futures Canada in
August 2007 and Creditex in August 2008, we have foreign
currency translation risk equal to our net investment in certain
Canadian and U.K. subsidiaries. The revenues, expenses and
financial results of these Canadian and U.K. subsidiaries are
denominated in Canadian dollars or pounds sterling, which are
the functional currencies of these subsidiaries. The financial
statements of these subsidiaries are translated into
U.S. dollars using a current rate of exchange, with gains
or losses included in the cumulative translation adjustment
account, a component of shareholders equity. As of
December 31, 2008, the portion of our shareholders
equity attributable to accumulated other comprehensive income
from foreign currency translation was $22.4 million. The
period-end foreign currency exchange rate for the Canadian
dollar to the U.S. dollar decreased from 1.0120 as of
December 31, 2007 to 0.8170 as of December 31, 2008
and the period-end foreign currency exchange rate for pounds
sterling to the U.S. dollar decreased from 1.9843 as of
December 31, 2007 to 1.4619 as of December 31, 2008.
Impact of
Inflation
We have not been adversely affected by inflation as
technological advances and competition have generally caused
prices for the hardware and software that we use for our
electronic platform to remain constant or to decline. In the
event of inflation, we believe that we will be able to pass on
any price increases to our participants, as the prices that we
charge are not governed by long-term contracts.
86
|
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
INDEX TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Subsidiaries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
87
REPORT OF
MANAGEMENT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL
REPORTING
Our management is responsible for the preparation and integrity
of the consolidated financial statements appearing in our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K.
The financial statements were prepared in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles appropriate in the
circumstances and, accordingly, include certain amounts based on
our best judgments and estimates. Financial information in this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
is consistent with that in the financial statements.
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting as such term
is defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange
Act). Our internal control over financial reporting is
designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the
consolidated financial statements. Our internal control over
financial reporting is supported by a program of internal audits
and appropriate reviews by management, written policies and
guidelines, careful selection and training of qualified
personnel and a written Code of Business Conduct adopted by our
Board of Directors, applicable to all Company Directors and all
officers and employees of our Company and subsidiaries.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements and
even when determined to be effective, can only provide
reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement
preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any
evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the
risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies
or procedures may deteriorate.
The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors, comprised solely
of directors who are independent in accordance with the
requirements of the New York Stock Exchange listing standards,
the Exchange Act and our Board of Director Governance
Principles, meets with the independent auditors, management and
internal auditors periodically to discuss internal control over
financial reporting and auditing and financial reporting
matters. The Audit Committee reviews with the independent
auditors the scope and results of the audit effort. The Audit
Committee also meets periodically with the independent auditors
and the internal auditors without management present to ensure
that the independent auditors and the internal auditors have
free access to the Audit Committee. Our Audit Committees
Report will be included in our 2009 Proxy Statement.
Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008. In making
this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO) in Internal Control Integrated
Framework. Based on our assessment, management believes that
we maintained effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2008.
As permitted by SEC regulations, our management has excluded
Creditex Group Inc. from its assessment of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 since it was
acquired in a purchase business combination in 2008. Creditex
Group Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary with total assets of
$87.6 million as of December 31, 2008 and total
revenues of $52.2 million since the date of acquisition.
Our independent auditors, Ernst & Young LLP, a
registered public accounting firm, are appointed by the Audit
Committee, subject to ratification by our shareholders.
Ernst & Young LLP has audited and reported on our
consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting. The reports of our
registered public accounting firm are contained in this Annual
Report.
|
|
|
/s/ Jeffrey
C. Sprecher
|
|
/s/ Scott
A. Hill
|
Jeffrey C. Sprecher
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Scott A. Hill
Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
February 11, 2009
|
|
February 11, 2009
|
88
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON INTERNAL
CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Board of Directors and Shareholders
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.
We have audited IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.s internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008,
based on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria).
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.s management is responsible
for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting included in the
accompanying Report of Management on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the Companys internal control over financial
reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As indicated in the accompanying Report of Management on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting,
managements assessment of and conclusion on the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did
not include the internal controls of Creditex Group Inc., which
is included in the 2008 consolidated financial statements of
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and constituted
$87.6 million and $43.3 million of total and net
assets, respectively, as of December 31, 2008 and
$52.2 million and $5.0 million of revenues and net
income, excluding intercompany charges, respectively, for the
year then ended. Our audit of internal control over financial
reporting of IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. also did not include
an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting
of Creditex Group Inc.
In our opinion, IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. maintained, in
all material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on the COSO
criteria.
89
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.
and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the
related consolidated statements of income, changes in
shareholders equity, comprehensive income, and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2008, of IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and
Subsidiaries and our report dated February 10, 2009
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Atlanta, Georgia
February 10, 2009
90
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Board of Directors and Shareholders
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in shareholders equity,
comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2008. Our audits also
included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at
Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial position of IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries at December 31, 2008 and 2007, and
the consolidated results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2008, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the
related financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set
forth therein.
As discussed in Note 11 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards
Board Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes an Interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 109, effective January 1,
2007.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.s internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 10,
2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Atlanta, Georgia
February 10, 2009
91
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
283,522
|
|
|
$
|
119,597
|
|
Short-term restricted cash
|
|
|
30,724
|
|
|
|
19,624
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
3,419
|
|
|
|
140,955
|
|
Customer accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $1,400 and $370 at December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively
|
|
|
81,248
|
|
|
|
52,018
|
|
Margin deposits and guaranty funds
|
|
|
12,117,820
|
|
|
|
792,052
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
35,855
|
|
|
|
17,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
12,552,588
|
|
|
|
1,142,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
88,952
|
|
|
|
63,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,434,816
|
|
|
|
1,009,687
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
728,855
|
|
|
|
537,722
|
|
Long-term restricted cash
|
|
|
105,740
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Cost method investments
|
|
|
32,724
|
|
|
|
38,778
|
|
Other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
15,906
|
|
|
|
1,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
2,318,041
|
|
|
|
1,590,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
14,959,581
|
|
|
$
|
2,796,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
49,663
|
|
|
$
|
27,811
|
|
Accrued salaries and benefits
|
|
|
41,096
|
|
|
|
23,878
|
|
Current portion of licensing agreement
|
|
|
12,686
|
|
|
|
10,572
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
46,875
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
17,708
|
|
|
|
11,687
|
|
Margin deposits and guaranty funds
|
|
|
12,117,820
|
|
|
|
792,052
|
|
Current portion of unearned government grant
|
|
|
8,737
|
|
|
|
1,748
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
17,057
|
|
|
|
5,713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
12,311,642
|
|
|
|
910,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent deferred tax liability, net
|
|
|
194,301
|
|
|
|
108,739
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
332,500
|
|
|
|
184,375
|
|
Noncurrent portion of licensing agreement
|
|
|
82,989
|
|
|
|
89,645
|
|
Long-term unearned government grant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,737
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
24,901
|
|
|
|
17,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
634,691
|
|
|
|
408,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
12,946,333
|
|
|
|
1,319,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
5,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable stock put
|
|
|
1,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 25,000 shares
authorized; no shares issued or outstanding at December 31,
2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 194,275 shares
authorized; 76,502 and 70,963 shares issued at
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively; 72,364 and
69,711 shares outstanding at December 31, 2008 and
2007, respectively
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
|
710
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost; 4,138 and 1,252 shares at
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively
|
|
|
(355,520
|
)
|
|
|
(30,188
|
)
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
1,608,344
|
|
|
|
1,043,971
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
732,752
|
|
|
|
431,708
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
19,890
|
|
|
|
30,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
2,006,231
|
|
|
|
1,476,856
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
14,959,581
|
|
|
$
|
2,796,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
92
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction and clearing fees, net (including $13,657 with
related-parties
in 2006)
|
|
$
|
693,229
|
|
|
$
|
490,358
|
|
|
$
|
273,629
|
|
Market data fees (including $412 with related-parties in 2006)
|
|
|
102,944
|
|
|
|
70,396
|
|
|
|
34,236
|
|
Other (including $680, $1,729 and $1,984 with related-parties in
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively)
|
|
|
16,905
|
|
|
|
13,539
|
|
|
|
5,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
813,078
|
|
|
|
574,293
|
|
|
|
313,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
|
159,792
|
|
|
|
101,397
|
|
|
|
49,750
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
29,705
|
|
|
|
23,047
|
|
|
|
11,395
|
|
Patent royalty
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,705
|
|
|
|
9,039
|
|
CBOT merger-related transaction costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
67,800
|
|
|
|
50,759
|
|
|
|
25,266
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
62,247
|
|
|
|
32,701
|
|
|
|
13,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
319,544
|
|
|
|
220,730
|
|
|
|
109,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
493,534
|
|
|
|
353,563
|
|
|
|
204,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and investment income
|
|
|
11,536
|
|
|
|
11,865
|
|
|
|
8,565
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(19,573
|
)
|
|
|
(18,641
|
)
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(12,001
|
)
|
|
|
11,647
|
|
|
|
(426
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(20,038
|
)
|
|
|
4,871
|
|
|
|
7,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
473,496
|
|
|
|
358,434
|
|
|
|
212,543
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
172,524
|
|
|
|
117,822
|
|
|
|
69,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
300,972
|
|
|
$
|
240,612
|
|
|
$
|
143,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
4.23
|
|
|
$
|
3.49
|
|
|
$
|
2.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
4.17
|
|
|
$
|
3.39
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
71,184
|
|
|
|
68,985
|
|
|
|
56,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
72,164
|
|
|
|
70,980
|
|
|
|
59,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Stock,
|
|
|
Stock,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Available-
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Series 1
|
|
|
Series 2
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
For-Sale
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Translation
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Hedges
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2006
|
|
|
18,400
|
|
|
$
|
184
|
|
|
|
2,863
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
|
35,782
|
|
|
$
|
358
|
|
|
|
(1,534
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,541
|
)
|
|
$
|
177,602
|
|
|
$
|
(6,899
|
)
|
|
$
|
47,911
|
|
|
$
|
21,338
|
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
$
|
(2,450
|
)
|
|
$
|
232,623
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,525
|
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,432
|
|
Exercise of common stock options
|
|
|
2,407
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
21,981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,818
|
|
Reversal of deferred stock compensation in connection with
adoption of SFAS No. 123(R)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,899
|
)
|
|
|
6,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of Class A common stock, Series 1 and
Series 2 into common stock
|
|
|
38,748
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
(2,863
|
)
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(35,885
|
)
|
|
|
(359
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury shares received for restricted stock and stock option
tax payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(4,765
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,765
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,489
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
(746
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefits from stock option plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,313
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006
|
|
|
59,596
|
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,471
|
)
|
|
|
(9,748
|
)
|
|
|
245,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191,179
|
|
|
|
29,863
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2,450
|
)
|
|
|
454,468
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,183
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,244
|
|
Exercise of common stock options
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(472
|
)
|
|
|
9,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,459
|
|
Issuance of shares for acquisitions
|
|
|
10,303
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
707,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
707,663
|
|
Treasury shares received during acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
Treasury shares received for restricted stock and stock option
tax payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
|
|
(24,814
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,814
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,415
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
5,043
|
|
|
|
(5,043
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefits from stock option plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,089
|
|
Cumulative effect of adoption of FIN 48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
70,963
|
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,252
|
)
|
|
|
(30,188
|
)
|
|
|
1,043,971
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
431,708
|
|
|
|
33,046
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
(2,450
|
)
|
|
|
1,476,856
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,657
|
)
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,765
|
)
|
Exercise of common stock options
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(225
|
)
|
|
|
5,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,985
|
|
Issuance of shares for acquisitions
|
|
|
4,906
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
496,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
496,581
|
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,220
|
)
|
|
|
(300,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(300,000
|
)
|
Change in fair value of redeemable stock put
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Treasury shares received for restricted stock and stock option
tax payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(295
|
)
|
|
|
(45,783
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,783
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,112
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
20,676
|
|
|
|
(20,678
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefits from stock option plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,201
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
76,502
|
|
|
$
|
765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
(4,138
|
)
|
|
$
|
(355,520
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,608,344
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
732,752
|
|
|
$
|
22,389
|
|
|
$
|
(49
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,450
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,006,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
94
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
300,972
|
|
|
$
|
240,612
|
|
|
$
|
143,268
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax of
($1,677), $655 and $830 for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively
|
|
|
(10,657
|
)
|
|
|
3,183
|
|
|
|
8,525
|
|
Change in available-for-sale securities, net of tax of ($39),
$22 and ($34) for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007
and 2006, respectively
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
290,207
|
|
|
$
|
243,856
|
|
|
$
|
151,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
95
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
300,972
|
|
|
$
|
240,612
|
|
|
$
|
143,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
62,247
|
|
|
|
32,701
|
|
|
|
13,714
|
|
Gain on disposal of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,268
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
1,644
|
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
(615
|
)
|
|
|
724
|
|
Loss on impairment of NCDEX
|
|
|
15,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gains on sales of available-for-sale investments
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
(882
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
36,382
|
|
|
|
23,595
|
|
|
|
8,825
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
(16,986
|
)
|
|
|
(3,222
|
)
|
|
|
(5,345
|
)
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(44,080
|
)
|
|
|
(60,812
|
)
|
|
|
(40,996
|
)
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer accounts receivable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade, net
|
|
|
(15,159
|
)
|
|
|
(4,919
|
)
|
|
|
(19,397
|
)
|
Related-parties
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
(329
|
)
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(3,051
|
)
|
|
|
(2,359
|
)
|
|
|
(4,310
|
)
|
Noncurrent assets
|
|
|
1,029
|
|
|
|
1,267
|
|
|
|
(510
|
)
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
58,023
|
|
|
|
74,003
|
|
|
|
37,791
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued salaries and benefits, and other
accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(22,924
|
)
|
|
|
(3,400
|
)
|
|
|
16,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
74,140
|
|
|
|
47,169
|
|
|
|
7,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
375,112
|
|
|
|
287,781
|
|
|
|
150,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(30,484
|
)
|
|
|
(30,999
|
)
|
|
|
(12,377
|
)
|
Capitalized software development costs
|
|
|
(18,328
|
)
|
|
|
(12,267
|
)
|
|
|
(7,438
|
)
|
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(44,606
|
)
|
|
|
(480,114
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,099
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost method investment
|
|
|
(2,385
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(36,937
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale investments
|
|
|
236,935
|
|
|
|
272,771
|
|
|
|
346,090
|
|
Purchases of available-for-sale investments
|
|
|
(102,567
|
)
|
|
|
(332,357
|
)
|
|
|
(309,227
|
)
|
Capitalized acquisition costs
|
|
|
(2,210
|
)
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
(4,124
|
)
|
Increase in restricted cash
|
|
|
(106,101
|
)
|
|
|
(6,431
|
)
|
|
|
(3,615
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(69,746
|
)
|
|
|
(637,388
|
)
|
|
|
(27,628
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
44,080
|
|
|
|
60,812
|
|
|
|
40,996
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
Proceeds from credit facilities
|
|
|
195,000
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of credit facilities
|
|
|
(37,500
|
)
|
|
|
(28,125
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance costs for credit facilities
|
|
|
(1,519
|
)
|
|
|
(2,375
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Payments relating to treasury shares received for restricted
stock and stock option tax payments and exercises
|
|
|
(46,008
|
)
|
|
|
(25,484
|
)
|
|
|
(4,953
|
)
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
(300,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(382
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options
|
|
|
5,210
|
|
|
|
9,931
|
|
|
|
22,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(141,119
|
)
|
|
|
264,759
|
|
|
|
58,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(322
|
)
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
2,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
163,925
|
|
|
|
(84,660
|
)
|
|
|
184,255
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
|
|
119,597
|
|
|
|
204,257
|
|
|
|
20,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
|
|
$
|
283,522
|
|
|
$
|
119,597
|
|
|
$
|
204,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow disclosure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
$
|
129,879
|
|
|
$
|
54,255
|
|
|
$
|
38,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
10,963
|
|
|
$
|
14,586
|
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental noncash investing and financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock and vested stock options issued for acquisitions
|
|
$
|
499,768
|
|
|
$
|
707,663
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
96
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
1.
|
Nature of
Business and Organization
|
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. (the Company) is a
leading operator of global regulated futures exchanges and
over-the-counter (OTC) markets for commodities and
derivative financial products. The Company owns 100% of ICE
Futures Europe, which operates as a United Kingdom
(U.K.) Recognized Investment Exchange for the
purpose of price discovery, trading and risk management within
the energy commodity futures and options markets. The Company
owns 100% of ICE Futures U.S., Inc.
(ICE Futures U.S.), which operates as a
United States (U.S.) Designated Contract Market for
the purpose of price discovery, trading and risk management
within the soft commodity, index and currency futures and
options markets. The Company owns 100% of ICE Futures Canada,
Inc. (ICE Futures Canada), which operates as a
Canadian Commodity Futures Exchange for the purpose of price
discovery, trading and risk management within the agricultural
futures and options markets. The Company acquired 100% of
Creditex Group Inc. (Creditex) on August 29,
2008. Creditex operates in the OTC credit default swaps
(CDS) markets. In addition, the Company currently
operates three central counterparty clearing houses.
Headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, the Company also has offices
in London, New York, Chicago, Houston, Calgary, Winnipeg and
Singapore.
The Company currently operates the OTC energy markets as an
exempt commercial market (ECM) pursuant to the
Commodity Exchange Act and regulations of the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission (CFTC). As an ECM, the Company is
required to file a notice with the CFTC, provide the CFTC with
access to its trading system and certain trading reports and
respond to requests for information or records from the CFTC.
ICE Futures Europe is subject to extensive regulation in the
United Kingdom by the Financial Services Authority
(FSA), in accordance with the Financial Services and
Markets Act 2000. ICE Futures Europe is responsible for
maintaining financial resources sufficient for the proper
performance of its functions as a Recognized Investment
Exchange, and, in order to satisfy this requirement, is
obligated to maintain a minimum amount of liquid financial
assets at all times.
ICE Futures U.S. is subject to extensive regulation in the
U.S. by the CFTC under the Commodity Exchange Act. The
Commodity Exchange Act generally requires that futures trading
conducted in the U.S. be conducted on a commodity exchange
designated as a contract market by the CFTC. It also establishes
non-financial criteria for an exchange to be designated to list
futures and options contracts. Designation as a contract market
for the trading of specified futures contracts is non-exclusive.
This means that the CFTC may designate additional exchanges as
contract markets for trading in the same or similar contracts.
As a designated contract market, ICE Futures U.S. is a
self-regulatory organization that has instituted detailed rules
and procedures to comply with the core principles
applicable to it under the Commodity Exchange Act.
ICE Futures U.S. also has surveillance and compliance
operations and procedures to monitor and enforce compliance with
its rules, and ICE Futures U.S. is periodically audited by
the CFTC with respect to the fulfillment of ICE Futures
U.S.s self-regulatory programs in these areas.
ICE Futures Canadas operations are subject to extensive
regulation by the Manitoba Securities Commission
(MSC), under the Commodity Futures Act (Manitoba)
(CFA). The CFA requires that an organization must be
recognized and registered before it can carry on the business of
a futures exchange. It establishes financial and non-financial
criteria for an exchange. ICE Futures Canada also has
surveillance and compliance operations and procedures to monitor
and enforce compliance by market participants with its rules,
and ICE Futures Canada is under the audit jurisdiction of
the MSC with respect to these self-regulatory functions.
The Company also owns three clearing houses. ICE Clear Europe
clears and settles contracts for ICE Futures Europe and OTC
cleared contracts and is regulated by the FSA as a Recognized
Clearing House. ICE Futures U.S. owns its clearing house,
ICE Clear U.S., which clears and settles contracts traded on, or
subject to the rules of, ICE Futures U.S. ICE Clear
U.S. is a Derivatives Clearing Organization and is
97
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
regulated by the CFTC. ICE Futures Canada owns its clearing
house, ICE Clear Canada, which clears and settles contracts
traded on, or subject to the rules of, ICE Futures Canada. ICE
Clear Canada is a recognized clearing house under the provisions
of the CFA and is regulated by the MSC.
The Company does not risk its own capital by engaging in any
trading activities or by extending credit to market participants.
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Basis
of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are presented
in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. The consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All
intercompany balances and transactions between the Company and
its wholly-owned subsidiaries have been eliminated in
consolidation. As discussed in Note 3, the Company
completed several acquisitions in 2008 and 2007 and has included
the financial results of these companies in its consolidated
financial statements effective from the respective acquisition
dates forward.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires the
Companys management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements. Estimates also affect the reported
amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual amounts
could differ from those estimates.
Minority
Interest
For those consolidated subsidiaries in which the Companys
ownership is less than 100% and for which the Company has
control over the assets and liabilities and the management of
the entity, the outside stockholders interests are shown
as minority interests. In connection with the Companys
acquisition of Creditex, the Company holds a 50.1% equity
ownership in QW Holdings LLC, which the Company consolidates. QW
Holdings LLC owns Q-WIXX, which is a dealer-to-client electronic
platform for trading portfolios of CDS. The platform is a joint
initiative between Creditex and the dealer community and has
been operated in both North America and Europe since June 2007.
A minority interest in QW Holdings LLC is recorded in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
2008 for the ownership interest held by the limited partners.
Segment
and Geographic Information
The Company currently has three reportable operating segments:
its OTC business segment, its futures business segment, and its
market data business segment. All three operate across domestic
and international markets. Substantially all of the
Companys identifiable assets are located in the United
States, the United Kingdom and Canada.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all short-term, highly liquid investments
with remaining maturities at the purchase date of three months
or less to be cash equivalents.
98
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Restricted
Cash
The Company classifies all cash and cash equivalents that are
not available for general use by the Company, either due to FSA
requirements or through restrictions in specific agreements, as
restricted in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets
(Note 4).
Short-Term
and Long-Term Investments
The Company invests a portion of its cash in excess of
short-term operating needs in government securities, equity
securities, investment-grade marketable debt securities and
municipal bonds (Note 5). These investments are classified
as available-for-sale in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 115,
Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity
Securities. The Company does not have any investments
classified as held-to-maturity or trading. Available-for-sale
investments are carried at their fair value, with unrealized
gains and losses, net of deferred income taxes, reported as a
component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Realized
gains and losses, and declines in value deemed to be
other-than-temporary on available-for-sale investments, are
recognized currently in earnings.
The Company determines the appropriate classification of its
investments at the time of purchase and reevaluates such
designation at each balance sheet date. The Company may or may
not hold securities with stated maturities greater than twelve
months until maturity. In response to changes in the
availability of and the yield on alternative investments as well
as liquidity requirements, the Company occasionally sells these
securities prior to their stated maturities. As these securities
are viewed by the Company as available to support current
operations and requirements, certain investments with maturities
beyond 12 months are classified as current assets in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Investments that the
Company intends to hold for more than one year are classified as
long-term investments in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets.
Cost
Method Investments
The Company uses the cost method to account for investments in
companies that the Company does not control and for which the
Company does not have the ability to exercise significant
influence over the entities operating and financial policies
(Note 6).
Margin
Deposits and Guaranty Funds
Original margin, variation margin and guaranty funds held by the
Companys clearing houses for clearing members may be in
the form of cash, money market mutual fund shares, Government
obligations, or letters of credit (Note 14). Cash original
margin, variation margin and guaranty fund deposits are
reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as
current assets and current liabilities. The amount of margin
deposits on hand will fluctuate over time as a result of, among
other things, the extent of open positions held at any point in
time by market participants in contracts and the margin rates
then in effect for such contracts. Non-cash original margin and
guaranty fund deposits are not reflected in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets. These securities are held in
safekeeping and are only pledged to the Companys clearing
houses, and the Companys clearing houses do not take legal
ownership.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost, reduced by
accumulated depreciation (Note 7). Depreciation and
amortization expense related to property and equipment is
computed using the straight-line method based on estimated
useful lives of the assets, or in the case of leasehold
improvements, the shorter of the initial lease term or the
estimated useful life of the asset. The Company reviews the
remaining estimated useful lives of its property and equipment
at each balance sheet date and will make adjustments to the
estimated remaining
99
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
useful lives whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the remaining useful lives have changed. Gains on
disposals of property and equipment are included in other income
and losses on disposals of property and equipment and are
included in depreciation expense. Maintenance and repairs are
expensed as incurred.
Software
Development Costs
The Company capitalizes costs, both internal and external direct
and incremental costs, related to software developed or obtained
for internal use in accordance with AICPA Statement of Position
98-1,
Accounting for Costs of Computer Software Developed or
Obtained for Internal Use. Software development costs
incurred during the preliminary or maintenance project stage are
expensed as incurred, while costs incurred during the
application development stage are capitalized and are amortized
using the straight-line method over the useful life of the
software, not to exceed three years. Amortization of these
capitalized costs begins only when the software becomes ready
for its intended use. General and administrative costs related
to developing or obtaining such software are expensed as
incurred.
Goodwill
and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
The Company has recorded goodwill for the excess of the purchase
price for its acquisitions over the fair value of identifiable
net assets acquired, including other identified intangible
assets (Note 8). The Company recognizes specifically
identifiable intangibles when a specific right or contract is
acquired. Goodwill has been allocated to reporting units for
purposes of impairment testing based on the portion of synergy,
cost savings and other expected future cash flows expected to
benefit the reporting units at the time of the acquisition.
The Company tests its goodwill for impairment at the reporting
unit level, which in some cases is different than the operating
segment level where the goodwill is reported under
SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information. The reporting unit
levels for the Companys goodwill are the OTC, Creditex,
ICE Futures U.S, ICE Futures Europe, ICE Futures Canada and
market data reporting units. Goodwill impairment testing at the
reporting unit level is performed utilizing a two-step
methodology in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets. The initial step requires the Company to determine
the fair value of each reporting unit and compare it to the
carrying value, including goodwill and other intangible assets,
of such reporting unit. If the fair value exceeds the carrying
value, no impairment loss is recognized and the second step,
which is a calculation of the impairment, is not performed.
However, if the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its
fair value, an impairment charge is recorded equal to the extent
that the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair
value.
The Companys indefinite-lived intangible assets are
evaluated for impairment annually in its fiscal fourth quarter
or more often if events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the asset may be impaired. Such evaluation includes
comparing the fair value of the asset with its carrying value.
If the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset is
less than its carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized
in an amount equal to the difference. This analysis did not
result in an impairment charge during the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 or 2006.
Intellectual
Property
All costs related to internally developed patents and trademarks
are expensed as incurred. All costs related to purchased
patents, trademarks and internet domain names are recorded as
other intangible assets and are amortized on a straight-line
basis over their estimated useful lives. All costs related to
licensed patents are capitalized and amortized on a
straight-line basis over the term of the license.
100
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets and Finite-Lived Intangible
Assets
The Company reviews its property and equipment and finite-lived
intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be fully
recoverable. To analyze recoverability, the Company projects
undiscounted net future cash flows over the remaining life of
such assets. If these projected cash flows are less than the
carrying amount, an impairment would be recognized, resulting in
a write-down of assets with a corresponding charge to earnings.
The impairment loss is measured based upon the difference
between the carrying amount and the fair value of the assets.
Finite-lived intangible assets are generally amortized on a
straight-line basis or using an accelerated method over the
lesser of their contractual or estimated useful lives.
Income
Taxes
The Company and its U.S. subsidiaries file a consolidated
U.S. federal income tax return. State income tax returns
are filed on a separate, combined or consolidated basis in
accordance with relevant state laws and regulations. The
majority of the Companys foreign subsidiaries are based in
the United Kingdom and they file separate local country income
tax returns and take advantage of the United Kingdoms
group relief provisions when applicable. Deferred tax expenses
and benefits are recognized for changes in deferred tax assets
and liabilities. The difference between the statutory income tax
rate and our effective tax rate for a given period is primarily
a reflection of the tax effects of our foreign operations,
general business and tax credits, tax-exempt income, state
income taxes and the non-deductibility of certain expenses.
Revenue
Recognition
The Companys revenues primarily consist of transaction and
clearing fee revenues for OTC and futures transactions executed
through the Companys internet-based global electronic
platform, through the ICE Futures U.S. open-outcry
exchange or through the Companys Creditex voice brokers
and are recognized on the date the transactions occur. The
Company calculates the transaction and clearing fee revenues
based on the volume of each commodity traded multiplied by the
transaction rate for each commodity type. The futures
transaction and clearing fee revenues are determined on the
basis of the transaction and clearing fee charged for each
contract traded on the exchange. Prior to the launch of ICE
Clear Europe in November 2008, the Company did not recognize any
clearing revenue on the ICE Futures Europe and OTC cleared
contracts and the cleared transaction fees were remitted by
LCH.Clearnet Ltd, a clearing house based in London, to ICE
Futures Europe and to the Company for cleared OTC contracts on a
monthly basis.
Transaction and clearing fees are recorded net of rebates of
$93.0 million, $37.3 million and $7.4 million for
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. The Company offers rebates in certain of its
markets primarily to help generate market liquidity and trading
volumes by providing customers trading in those markets a full
or partial discount to the applicable commission rate.
Typically, the Company offers these rebates until it believes
the market has generated sufficient liquidity and volume so that
the rebates are no longer needed to sustain and promote
liquidity. These rebates reduce revenue that the Company would
have generated had it charged full transaction fees and had it
generated the same volume without the rebate program.
Market data fee revenues primarily include terminal and license
fees received from data vendors in exchange for the provision of
real-time futures price information and data access fees. Market
data fees are charged to data vendors on a monthly basis based
on the number and type of terminals they have carrying futures
data. Each data vendor also pays an annual license fee, which is
deferred and recognized as revenue ratably over the period of
the annual license. Market data fee revenues also include
monthly data access fees charged to customers that are signed up
to trade on the OTC electronic platform. The monthly data access
amount for each company is based on the number of users at each
company signed up to trade on the electronic platform. The
difference between the monthly data access fee total for each
company and the actual
101
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
amount of commissions paid that month for trading activity is
recognized as monthly data access revenues. The actual amount of
commissions paid that month for trading activity is recognized
as transaction and clearing fee revenues.
Other revenues are recognized as services are provided or they
are deferred and amortized ratably over the periods to which
they relate.
Sources
of Supplies
The Company uses 13 primary vendors for equipment used in the
electronic platform and its network. If these vendors were
unable to meet the Companys needs, management believes
that the Company could obtain this equipment from other vendors
on comparable terms and that its operating results would not be
materially adversely affected.
Credit
Risk and Significant Customers
The Companys accounts receivable related to its OTC
business segment and its market data business segment subjects
the Company to credit risk, as the Company does not require its
customers to post collateral for bilateral trades or for market
data services. The Company does not risk its own capital in
transactions or extend credit to market participants in any
commodities markets. The Company limits its risk of loss by
allowing trading access to companies that qualify as eligible
commercial entities, as defined in the Commodity Exchange Act,
and by terminating access to trade to entities with delinquent
accounts.
The growth of cleared OTC energy products also limits the
Companys risk of loss in its OTC business as the clearing
houses collect cleared transaction fees on the date the
transactions occur. During the year ended December 31, 2008,
62.7% of the OTC business segment commission fee revenues were
from cleared trades. The futures businesses have minimal credit
risk as all of their transaction revenues are currently cleared
through ICE Clear Europe, ICE Clear U.S. or ICE Clear
Canada. The Companys clearing businesses have substantial
credit risk, as more fully described in Note 14.
The Companys accounts receivable is stated at cost. There
were no accounts receivable balances greater than 10% of total
consolidated accounts receivable as of December 31, 2008 or
December 31, 2007. No single customer accounted for more
than 10% of total consolidated revenues during any of the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007 or 2006.
Stock-Based
Compensation
The Company currently sponsors employee stock option and
restricted stock plans. SFAS No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment, requires the measurement and
recognition of compensation expenses for all share-based payment
awards made to employees and directors including employee stock
options and restricted stock based on estimated fair values.
SFAS No. 123(R) requires companies to estimate the
fair value of stock option awards on the date of grant using an
option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that
is ultimately expected to vest is recognized as stock-based
compensation expenses over the requisite service period in the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
the Company recognized excess tax benefits of
$44.2 million, $61.1 million and $43.3 million,
respectively, as an increase to the additional paid-in capital
balance. Of that amount, $44.1 million, $60.8 million
and $41.0 million for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, were qualifying excess tax
benefits that are eligible to absorb future write-offs, if any,
of unrealized deferred tax assets related to stock options. In
accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), the
$44.1 million, $60.8 million and $41.0 million is
reported as a financing cash flow in the accompanying
consolidated statement of cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
102
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Regarding the ordering of tax benefits to determine whether an
excess tax benefit is realized, as well as to measure that
excess tax benefit, the Company follows applicable tax laws and
disregards indirect effects of the excess tax benefit.
Employee and director stock-based compensation expenses and the
related income tax benefit recognized for both stock options and
restricted stock in the accompanying consolidated statement of
income for the year ended December 31, 2008 was
$36.4 million and $11.5 million, respectively, and was
$23.6 million and $7.4 million, respectively, for the
year ended December 31, 2007 and was $8.8 million and
$2.8 million, respectively, for the year ended
December 31, 2006. The amount expensed for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 is net of
$2.5 million, $1.8 million and $664,000, respectively,
of stock-based compensation that was capitalized as software
development costs.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model for
purposes of valuing stock option awards. The Companys
determination of fair value of stock option awards on the date
of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model is
affected by the Companys stock price as well as
assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective
variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, the
Companys expected share price volatility over the term of
the awards and actual and projected employee stock option
exercise behavior. Option-pricing models were developed for use
in estimating the value of traded options that have no vesting
or hedging restrictions and are fully transferable. Because the
Companys employee stock options have certain
characteristics that are significantly different from traded
options, and because changes in the subjective assumptions can
materially affect the estimated value, in managements
opinion, the existing valuation models may not provide an
accurate measure of the fair value of the Companys
employee stock options. Although the fair value of employee
stock options is determined in accordance with
SFAS No. 123(R) using an option pricing model, that
value may not be indicative of the fair value observed in a
willing buyer/willing seller market transaction, if one was to
exist.
Earnings
Per Common Share
Basic earnings per common share is calculated using the weighted
average common shares outstanding during the year. Common
equivalent shares from stock options and restricted stock
awards, using the treasury stock method, are also included in
the diluted per share calculations unless their effect of
inclusion would be antidilutive (Note 19).
Treasury
Stock
The Company records treasury stock activities under the cost
method whereby the cost of the acquired stock is recorded as
treasury stock (Note 10).
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The Companys financial instruments consist primarily of
cash and cash equivalents, short-term and long-term restricted
cash, short-term and long-term investments, customer accounts
receivable, margin deposits and guaranty funds, cost method
investments, short-term and long-term debt and other short-term
assets and liabilities. The fair value of the investments is
determined primarily by quoted prices in active markets for
identical securities. The fair value of short-term and long-term
debt approximates carrying value since the rate of interest on
the debt adjusts to market rates on a periodic basis. All other
financial instruments are determined to approximate carrying
value due to the short period of time to their maturities.
We carry our cost method investments at cost, or if a decline in
the value of the investment is deemed to be other than
temporary, at fair value. Estimates of fair value are generally
based on a discounted cash flow analysis.
103
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Foreign
Currency Translation Adjustments and Foreign Currency
Transaction Gains and Losses
In accordance with SFAS No. 52, Foreign Currency
Translation, the functional currency of all the
Companys U.K. subsidiaries had historically been pounds
sterling. The Company translated the assets and liabilities of
its U.K. subsidiaries into U.S. dollars using period-end
exchange rates and the revenues and expenses of these entities
were translated using the average exchange rates for the
reporting period. Translation adjustments were recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive income, a separate component of
shareholders equity in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets and in the consolidated statements of
comprehensive income.
Effective July 1, 2006, the functional currency of the
majority of the Companys U.K. subsidiaries, including ICE
Futures Europe, became the U.S. dollar.
SFAS No. 52 states that the functional currency
of an entity is the currency of the primary economic environment
in which the entity operates. The functional currency changed
based on various economic factors and circumstances, including
the fact that during the second quarter of 2006, ICE Futures
Europe began to charge and collect exchange fees in
U.S. dollars rather than pounds sterling in its key futures
contracts, including crude oil and heating oil contracts. The
Company no longer recognizes any translation adjustments in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements subsequent to
June 30, 2006 for those U.K. subsidiaries that have
switched their functional currency to the U.S. dollar.
In connection with the Companys acquisition of ICE Futures
Canada in August 2007 and Creditex in August 2008 (Note 3),
the Company now has foreign currency translation risk equal to
its net investment in certain Canadian and U.K. subsidiaries.
The revenues, expenses and financial results of these Canadian
and U.K. subsidiaries are denominated in Canadian dollars or
pounds sterling, which are the functional currencies of these
subsidiaries. The financial statements of these subsidiaries are
translated into U.S. dollars using current rates of
exchange, with gains or losses included in the cumulative
translation adjustment account, a component of
shareholders equity.
The Company has foreign currency transaction gains and losses
related to the settlement of foreign currency denominated
assets, liabilities and payables that occur through its
operations which are received in or paid in pounds sterling or
euros due to the increase or decrease in the period-end foreign
currency exchange rates between periods. Gains and losses from
foreign currency transactions are included in other income
(expense) in the accompanying consolidated statements of income
and resulted in net gains (losses) of $3.1 million,
$842,000 and ($288,000) for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Marketing
and Promotional Fees
Advertising costs, including print advertising and production
costs, product promotion campaigns and seminar, conference and
convention costs related to trade shows and other industry
events, are expensed as incurred. The Company incurred
advertising costs of $4.3 million, $4.1 million and
$1.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006, respectively.
Recently
Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB), issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands
fair value measurement disclosures. SFAS No. 157
became effective for the Company beginning in fiscal year 2008.
The Companys adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not
have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities including an Amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115, which permits entities to choose to measure
certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair
value. Unrealized gains and losses on items
104
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in
earnings. SFAS No. 159 became effective for the
Company beginning in fiscal year 2008. The Companys
adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not have a material
impact on its consolidated financial statements.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141
(revised 2007), Business Combinations,
(SFAS No. 141(R)).
SFAS No. 141(R) will significantly change the
accounting for business combinations. Under
SFAS No. 141(R), an acquiring entity will be required
to recognize all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in
a transaction at the acquisition-date fair value with limited
exceptions. SFAS No. 141(R) will change the accounting
treatment for certain specific acquisition related items
including expensing acquisition related costs as incurred,
valuing non-controlling interests at fair value at the
acquisition date and expensing restructuring costs associated
with an acquired business. SFAS No. 141(R) also
includes a substantial number of new disclosure requirements.
SFAS No. 141(R) is to be applied prospectively to
business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or
after January 1, 2009. The Company expects that
SFAS No. 141(R) will have an impact on its accounting
for future business combinations once adopted but the extent of
the impact is dependent upon the size, complexity and number of
acquisitions that are made in the future. In addition, as of
December 31, 2008, the Company has included deferred
acquisition costs of $2.2 million in its consolidated
balance sheet in non-current assets related to the expected 2009
acquisition of The Clearing Corporation. The Clearing
Corporation is a clearing house that provides clearing and
settlement services to its participants for trades in futures
contracts, options on futures contracts and OTC transactions
executed on various exchanges and marketplaces. These deferred
costs will be expensed upon the Companys adoption of
SFAS No. 141(R) on January 1, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements-an amendment of ARB No. 51.
SFAS No. 160 amends ARB No. 51 to establish and
improve accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 also
changes the way the consolidated income statement is presented,
establishes a single method of accounting for changes in a
parents ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not
result in deconsolidation, requires that a parent recognize a
gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated,
and expands disclosures in the consolidated financial statements
in order to clearly identify and distinguish between the
interests of the parents owners and the interest of the
noncontrolling owners of a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 is
effective for the Companys 2009 fiscal year. The Company
does not expect that the adoption of SFAS No. 160 will
have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
Creditex
Acquisition
The Company acquired 100% of Creditex on August 29, 2008
for a combination of stock and cash. The Company also assumed
the Creditex stock option and restricted stock award plans.
Creditex is a market leader and innovator in the execution and
processing of CDS with markets spanning the United States,
Europe and Asia. Creditex serves the most liquid segments of the
traded CDS market, including indexes, single-name instruments
and standardized tranches. The acquisition provides the Company
with the opportunity to expand into the global CDS market,
including trade execution and post-trade services. The
acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase business
combination. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed were
recorded at
105
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
their estimated fair values as of August 29, 2008. The
total purchase price was $535.4 million, and was comprised
of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid to Creditex stockholders
|
|
$
|
48,684
|
|
Fair value of the Companys common stock and vested stock
options issued
|
|
|
475,197
|
|
Excess working capital
|
|
|
6,188
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
5,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$
|
535,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the acquisition, the Company issued
4.7 million shares of its common stock to Creditex
stockholders and issued 764,000 vested stock options to Creditex
employees. The fair value of the Companys common stock was
determined for accounting purposes to be $85.50 per share, which
represented the average closing price of the Companys
common stock for the five business day period commencing two
business days prior to the first date on which the number of
shares and the amount of other consideration became fixed, which
was August 22, 2008. Acquisition-related transaction costs
include investment banking, legal and accounting fees,
valuation, printing and other external costs directly related to
the acquisition.
Under purchase accounting, the total purchase price was
allocated to Creditexs net tangible and identifiable
intangible assets based on the estimated fair values of those
assets as of August 29, 2008, as set forth below. The
excess of the purchase price over the net tangible and
identifiable intangible assets was recorded as goodwill. The
purchase price allocation is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments
|
|
$
|
45,913
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
35,795
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
5,368
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
380,080
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
215,400
|
|
Other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
20,896
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
(55,510
|
)
|
Deferred tax liabilities on identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
(99,110
|
)
|
Other long-term liabilities and minority interests
|
|
|
(13,437
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price allocation
|
|
$
|
535,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The entire goodwill amount above is included in the OTC business
segment for purposes of segment reporting as this is consistent
with how it is reported internally to the Companys chief
operating decision maker. The entire goodwill amount above was
allocated to the Creditex reporting unit for purposes of future
impairment testing.
In performing the purchase price allocation, the Company
considered, among other factors, the intended future use of
acquired assets, analyses of historical financial performance
and estimates of future performance of Creditexs business.
The following table sets forth the components of intangible
assets associated with the acquisition as of December 31,
2008 (in thousands, except years):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Book
|
|
|
|
Intangible Asset
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
184,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,534
|
|
|
$
|
180,466
|
|
|
12 years
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
15,100
|
|
|
|
2,990
|
|
|
|
12,110
|
|
|
1-1.75 years
|
Developed technology
|
|
|
13,700
|
|
|
|
1,476
|
|
|
|
12,224
|
|
|
5 years
|
Trade names
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
2,167
|
|
|
2 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
215,400
|
|
|
$
|
8,433
|
|
|
$
|
206,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Customer relationships represent the established and ongoing
relationships with Creditexs existing customers.
Non-compete agreements represent the estimated fair value of
agreements with Creditexs brokers and management team.
Developed technology represents both internally and externally
developed software related to Creditex trading operations. Trade
names represent the estimated fair value of the Creditex trade
names and trademarks. The customer relationships intangible
assets and the developed technology intangible assets are being
amortized using an accelerated method over their estimated
useful lives and the other intangible assets are being amortized
using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives.
The financial information in the table below summarizes the
combined results of operations of the Company and Creditex, on a
pro forma basis, as though the companies had been combined as of
the beginning of the periods presented. The pro forma financial
information is presented for informational purposes only and is
not indicative of the results of operations that would have been
achieved if the acquisition had taken place at the beginning of
the periods presented. Such pro forma financial information is
based on the historical financial statements of the Company and
Creditex. This pro forma financial information is based on
estimates and assumptions that have been made solely for
purposes of developing such pro forma information, including,
without limitation, purchase accounting adjustments. The pro
forma financial information presented below also includes
depreciation and amortization based on the preliminary valuation
of Creditexs tangible assets and identifiable intangible
assets resulting from the acquisition. The pro forma financial
information does not reflect any synergies or operating cost
reductions that may be achieved from the combined operations.
The pro forma financial information combines the historical
results for the Company and Creditex for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 in the following table (in
thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
933,584
|
|
|
$
|
733,634
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
286,841
|
|
|
$
|
225,924
|
|
Earnings per common share Basic
|
|
$
|
3.77
|
|
|
$
|
3.06
|
|
Earnings per common share Diluted
|
|
$
|
3.72
|
|
|
$
|
2.95
|
|
ICE
Futures U.S. Acquisition
The Company completed its acquisition of ICE Futures
U.S. on January 12, 2007. The acquisition has been
accounted for as a purchase business combination. Assets
acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their
estimated fair values as of January 12, 2007. The total
purchase price was $1.1 billion, and was comprised of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid to ICE Futures U.S. members
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
Fair value of the Companys common stock issued
|
|
|
706,663
|
|
Excess working capital
|
|
|
2,109
|
|
Transaction costs
|
|
|
14,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price
|
|
$
|
1,123,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the acquisition, the Company issued
10.3 million shares of its common stock to ICE Futures
U.S. members. The fair value of the Companys common
stock was determined for accounting purposes to be $68.63 per
share, which represented the average closing price of the
Companys common stock for the five business day period
commencing two business days prior to the public announcement of
the acquisition on September 14, 2006.
Under purchase accounting, the total purchase price was
allocated to ICE Futures U.S.s net tangible and
identifiable intangible assets based on the estimated fair
values of these assets as of January 12, 2007, as set
107
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
forth below. The excess of the purchase price over the net
tangible and identifiable intangible assets was recorded as
goodwill. The purchase price allocation is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments
|
|
$
|
39,945
|
|
Margin deposits and guaranty funds
|
|
|
784,385
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
14,993
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
16,149
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
890,573
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets
|
|
|
327,500
|
|
Other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
24,658
|
|
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(37,985
|
)
|
Accrued restructuring costs
|
|
|
(14,366
|
)
|
Margin deposits and guaranty funds
|
|
|
(784,385
|
)
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(114,108
|
)
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(23,917
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price allocation
|
|
$
|
1,123,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The entire goodwill amount above is included in the OTC business
segment for purposes of segment reporting as this is consistent
with how it is reported internally to the Companys chief
operating decision maker. Of the ICE Futures U.S. goodwill
balance above, $443.5 million was allocated to the OTC
reporting unit, $266.1 million was allocated to the ICE
Futures Europe reporting unit, $19.7 million was allocated
to the market data reporting unit and the remaining
$161.3 million was allocated to the ICE Futures
U.S. reporting unit for purposes of impairment testing. The
goodwill from the ICE Futures U.S. acquisition was
allocated based on the portion of the synergy, costs savings and
other expected future cash flows expected to benefit the
reporting units at the time of the acquisition.
The following table sets forth the components of intangible
assets associated with the acquisition as of December 31,
2008 (in thousands, except years):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Book
|
|
|
|
Intangible Asset
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
Agriculture and soft commodity trading products
|
|
$
|
195,200
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
195,200
|
|
|
Indefinite
|
Financial trading products
|
|
|
14,400
|
|
|
|
1,003
|
|
|
|
13,397
|
|
|
20 years
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
29,700
|
|
|
|
4,030
|
|
|
|
25,670
|
|
|
17-20 years
|
Technology
|
|
|
7,900
|
|
|
|
5,178
|
|
|
|
2,722
|
|
|
3 years
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
7,894
|
|
|
|
4,106
|
|
|
2-5 years
|
DCM/DCO designation
|
|
|
68,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,300
|
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
327,500
|
|
|
$
|
18,105
|
|
|
$
|
309,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The agriculture and soft commodity trading products identifiable
intangible asset relates to the core trading product rights and
privileges relating to the agriculture and soft commodity
trading products. An indefinite life was used for the
agriculture and soft commodity trading products as these
products have traded for many years at ICE Futures U.S., ICE
Futures U.S. is allowed to trade these products without
requiring a license from any third party and authorizations by
the CFTC to trade these products are perpetual. The financial
trading products have been assigned a 20 year useful life
as they do not have a long trading history, are not unique to
ICE Futures U.S. and in some cases are dependent on
licenses with third parties. Customer relationships represent
the underlying relationships with ICE Futures U.S.s
existing customers. Technology
108
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
represents both internally and externally developed software
related to clearing operations, back office, floor operations
and general operations. Non-compete agreements represent the
estimated fair value of agreements with ICE Futures U.S.s
former management team. DCM/DCO designation represents
Designated Contract Market (DCM) and Derivatives
Clearing Organization (DCO) designations available
from the CFTC under the Commodity Exchange Act when certain
standards are met. The customer relationships intangible asset
and the financial trading products intangible asset are being
amortized using an accelerated method and the other finite-lived
intangible assets are being amortized using the straight-line
method.
As a part of the acquisition of ICE Futures U.S., the Company
formed a plan to restructure the ICE Futures
U.S. duplicative employee functions to align them with the
Companys existing business functions and to streamline ICE
Futures U.S.s operations. The restructuring costs and the
related payments are documented in the following table (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve balance, January 12, 2007
|
|
$
|
11,040
|
|
Increase in reserve
|
|
|
3,326
|
|
Cost applied against the reserve
|
|
|
(11,761
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
2,605
|
|
Cost applied against the reserve
|
|
|
(2,605
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Acquisitions
On February 13, 2008, the Company acquired 100% of
YellowJacket Software, Inc. (YellowJacket) for a
combination of stock and cash. YellowJacket is a financial
technology firm that operates electronic trade negotiation
technology which offers a range of trading tools including
instant communication, negotiation and data for various
financial markets. With the YellowJacket platform, traders can
aggregate and consolidate fragmented instant message-based
communications and key transaction details on a single screen.
The acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase business
combination. The financial results of YellowJacket have been
included in the OTC business segment from the date of
acquisition.
On October 1, 2007, the Company acquired certain assets of
Chatham Energy Partners, LLC (Chatham) for cash.
Chatham is a leading OTC brokerage firm that specializes in
structuring and facilitating transactions in the natural gas
markets for energy options. Chatham supports the execution of
the Companys strategic plans to develop the leading
electronic marketplace for the execution of OTC energy options.
The acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase business
combination. The financial results of Chatham have been included
in the OTC business segment from the date of acquisition.
On August 27, 2007, the Company acquired 100% of ICE
Futures Canada and its clearing house, ICE Clear Canada, Inc.,
for cash. ICE Futures Canada is the leading agricultural futures
exchange in Canada and it offers futures and options contracts
on canola and western barley. In connection with the
acquisition, the Company transitioned the trading of the ICE
Futures Canada products to the Companys electronic
platform in December 2007. The acquisition has been accounted
for as a purchase business combination. The financial results
have been included in the futures business segment from the date
of acquisition.
On July 9, 2007, the Company acquired certain assets of
ChemConnect Inc. for cash. ChemConnect is an electronic
marketplace for the trading of OTC natural gas liquids and
chemical products, including propane, ethane, ethylene,
propylene and benzene. On the closing date of the acquisition,
the Company transitioned the trading of these products to the
Companys electronic platform. The acquisition has been
accounted for as a purchase business combination. The financial
results have been included in the OTC business segment from the
date of acquisition.
109
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
On February 28, 2007, the Company acquired all the assets
of Commoditrack, Inc. for a combination of cash and the
Companys common stock. The acquisition enables the Company
to provide its customers a real-time risk management program as
well as the ability to download trades and access profit and
loss detail on the Companys electronic platform. The
acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase business
combination. The financial results have been included in the OTC
business segment from the date of acquisition.
The aggregate cost of these other acquisitions was
$150.7 million, which was paid in cash and stock. Under
purchase accounting, the total purchase price was allocated to
net tangible and identifiable intangible assets based on
estimated fair values of these assets. The Company will make
additional payments in cash or stock to certain former
shareholders of YellowJacket and former shareholders of certain
other acquired companies if specified revenue targets or certain
other strategic goals specified in the purchase agreements for
those acquired companies are achieved. The maximum annual
contingent payments that could be made in 2009 and 2010 are
$16.2 million and $79.2 million, respectively.
|
|
4.
|
Short-Term
and Long-Term Restricted Cash
|
As a Recognized Investment Exchange, the FSA in the United
Kingdom requires ICE Futures Europe to restrict the use of the
equivalent of six months of operating expenditures in cash or
cash equivalents at all times. As of December 31, 2008 and
2007, this amount was equal to $12.1 million and
$13.1 million, respectively, and is reflected as short-term
restricted cash in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
The Company owns 100% of ICE Markets Limited, which is based in
London and supports the markets for European energy commodities,
performs helpdesk functions and is authorized by the FSA to act
as an arranger of deals in investments. The FSA requires ICE
Markets Limited to maintain a minimum level of financial
resources, which is calculated monthly on the basis of 25% of
the relevant annual expenditures, adjusted for any illiquid
assets. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the resource
requirement was equal to $1.9 million and
$2.7 million, respectively, and is reflected as short-term
restricted cash in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
The Company formed ICE Clear Europe to serve as a clearing house
to perform the clearing and settlement of each futures and
options contract that trades through ICE Futures Europe and for
all of the Companys cleared OTC energy products. ICE Clear
Europe began clearing these contracts in November 2008, upon the
transition of the clearing function from LCH.Clearnet Ltd. ICE
Clear Europe has been recognized by the FSA as a U.K. Recognized
Clearing House. As such, the FSA requires ICE Clear Europe to
restrict the use of the equivalent of six months of operating
expenditures in cash or cash equivalents at all times. As of
December 31, 2008, the resource requirement was equal to
$7.2 million and is reflected as short-term restricted cash
in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
Consistent with the other clearing houses that the Company owns,
ICE Clear Europe requires that each clearing member make
deposits in a fund known as the guaranty fund. The amounts in
the guaranty fund will serve to secure the obligations of a
clearing member to ICE Clear Europe and may be used to cover
losses in excess of the margin and clearing firm accounts
sustained by ICE Clear Europe in the event of a default of a
clearing member. ICE Clear Europe has committed
$100.0 million of its own cash as part of its guaranty
fund. This contribution was made in July 2008 and this cash is
reflected as long-term restricted cash in the consolidated
balance sheet as of December 31, 2008. ICE Clear
U.S. and ICE Clear Canada do not contribute to their
respective guaranty funds.
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, there is
$15.3 million and $6.9 million, respectively, of cash
held as escrow for previous acquisitions that is reflected as
short-term and long-term restricted cash in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets.
110
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
Short-Term
and Long-Term Investments
|
Investments consist of available-for-sale securities.
Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value using
primarily quoted prices in active markets for identical
securities, with unrealized gains or losses reported as a
component of accumulated other comprehensive income. The cost of
securities sold is based on the specific identification method.
As of December 31, 2008, available-for-sale securities
consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Foreign government securities
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
|
1,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,997
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
1,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
1,272
|
|
Municipal bonds
|
|
|
3,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
6,533
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
6,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007, available-for-sale securities
consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Government securities
|
|
$
|
418
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
417
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
28,757
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
28,817
|
|
Municipal bonds
|
|
|
111,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
140,896
|
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
140,955
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The contractual maturities of these investments as of
December 31, 2008, were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
Due within 1 year
|
|
$
|
3,107
|
|
Due within 1 year to 5 years
|
|
|
312
|
|
Due within 5 years to 10 years
|
|
|
|
|
Due after 10 years
|
|
|
3,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
6,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments that the Company intends to hold for more than one
year are classified as long-term investments. The Company
currently expects to hold $3.1 million of the investments
for more than one year as of December 31, 2008 and has
classified them as long-term investments in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet. The $3.1 million in long-term
investments relates to an auction rate security that failed to
settle at auction during the year ended December 31, 2008
due to recent credit market conditions. The fair value of this
auction rate security, which has continued to pay the full
coupon rate and has a high credit rating, was determined based
on level 3 unobservable inputs, which means the inputs
reflect managements own assumptions and the assets trade
infrequently, and are supported by little or no market activity
that are significant to the fair value of the asset. The Company
does not intend to hold any of the other investments for more
than one year. Therefore, the Company has classified the
remaining $3.4 million and $141.0 million as
short-term investments in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
111
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The Company considers all short-term, highly liquid investments
with remaining maturities at the purchase date of three months
or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Due to
the Companys decision to shift more of its funds into cash
equivalent investments, the available-for-sale short-term and
long-term investments decreased from $141.0 million as of
December 31, 2007 to $6.5 million as of
December 31, 2008. The decision to invest more in cash and
cash equivalent investments was primarily due to credit market
conditions.
|
|
6.
|
Cost
Method Investments and Impairment of NCDEX
|
The Company has an 8% equity ownership in the National Commodity
and Derivatives Exchange, Ltd (NCDEX), a derivatives
exchange located in Mumbai, India, which it acquired for
$37.0 million in 2006. In response to political pressure
regarding high commodity prices, the Indian government suspended
trading in several key agricultural contracts traded on NCDEX
during the year ended December 31, 2007. It is not yet
certain whether these suspensions will be permanent. However,
the Company currently believes that the delisting of the
contracts may be a temporary event as price volatility actually
increased after the contracts were delisted from trading,
suggesting little to no correlation between trading in these
products and price volatility. The Company also may be required
to sell a portion of its NCDEX stake by June 30, 2009 as a
result of a recently announced change in Indian law that limits
the total ownership by foreign entities in Indian commodities
exchanges to a maximum of 5%. The Company, as well as NCDEX and
other non-Indian NCDEX shareholders, have petitioned the Indian
government and the Forward Markets Commission, the market
regulator, to either increase the foreign ownership limit, to
grandfather those who were foreign investors at the time that
the law was passed in August 2008 or to extend the amount of
time permitted to sell interests in excess of 5% given current
market challenges. If these petitions are not successful, the
Company could be required to sell the 3% interest by June 2009
or shortly thereafter. The Company currently believes there may
not be sufficient demand for its shares due to current market
conditions such that it will likely not be able to recover its
carrying value if it is required to sell the 3% stake in the
near term.
The Company has estimated the current fair value of the NCDEX
investment to be in the range of $19 million to
$23 million as of December 31, 2008. The fair value of
this investment was determined based on level 3
unobservable inputs, which represent managements own
assumptions. The level 3 inputs were based on analyses of
discounted cash flows, comparable investments made by other
companies and revenue multiples, weighted based on
applicability. Observable inputs were not available as the asset
trades infrequently and has little or no market activity that
would be useful in estimating fair value. Given the significance
of the decrease in the estimated fair value resulting from the
suspended trading of the key NCDEX contracts, potential foreign
investment limits, current market conditions and the uncertainty
surrounding the potential for the Company to recover the
carrying value of the investment, the Company has written down
its cost method investment in NCDEX. As of December 31,
2008, the Company recorded an impairment loss of
$15.7 million, reducing the carrying value of the
investment to $21.3 million. The $15.7 million
impairment loss was recognized as other expense in the
accompanying consolidated statement of income for the year ended
December 31, 2008. The Company will continue to monitor the
$21.3 million carrying value and if it is determined that
additional other-than-temporary impairment exists, the Company
will recognize an impairment loss equal to the difference
between the fair value and the adjusted carrying value of the 8%
equity stake.
The Company has cost method investments in The Clearing
Corporation and in Trade-Settlement, Inc., both of which the
Company acquired in connection with its acquisition of Creditex
on August 29, 2008. Trade-Settlement, Inc. is a post trade
loan settlement process company that serves the global primary
and secondary syndicated loan markets. The Company also has cost
method investments in LCH.Clearnet Ltd, a third party clearing
house that previously cleared the Companys OTC and energy
futures contracts until the transition to ICE Clear Europe in
November 2008, and in Psydex Corporation, a company that
provides news aggregation services. The Company uses the cost
method to account for these investments as the Company
112
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
does not control and does not have the ability to exercise
significant influence over the operating and financial policies
of these companies.
|
|
7.
|
Property
and Equipment
|
Property and equipment consisted of the following as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Computer and network equipment
|
|
$
|
64,398
|
|
|
$
|
46,393
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Software and internally developed software
|
|
|
94,733
|
|
|
|
70,336
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Office furniture and equipment
|
|
|
12,830
|
|
|
|
11,707
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
27,028
|
|
|
|
14,492
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198,989
|
|
|
|
142,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(110,037
|
)
|
|
|
(79,404
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
88,952
|
|
|
$
|
63,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
amortization of software and internally developed software was
$12.7 million, $8.1 million and $6.1 million,
respectively, and depreciation of all other property and
equipment was $19.7 million, $15.1 million and
$4.7 million, respectively. The unamortized software and
internally developed software balances were $32.8 million
and $21.5 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
In August 2006, the Company entered into an agreement with a
third party to sell its former open-outcry disaster recovery
site in London. Prior to the closure of the Companys
open-outcry floor in London during April 2005, the building on
this site was used as a backup open-outcry trading facility. The
sale was completed in February 2007 at which time final payment
was received and a net gain on disposal of an asset of
$9.3 million was recognized as other income in the
accompanying consolidated statement of income for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
|
|
8.
|
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
|
The following is a summary of the activity in the goodwill
balance for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
79,575
|
|
Acquisition of ICE Futures U.S.
|
|
|
890,466
|
|
Other acquisitions
|
|
|
37,801
|
|
Other activity
|
|
|
1,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,009,687
|
|
Acquisition of Creditex
|
|
|
380,080
|
|
Acquisition of YellowJacket
|
|
|
46,961
|
|
Other activity
|
|
|
(1,912
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
1,434,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company completed the ICE Futures U.S. acquisition
during the year ended December 31, 2007, which resulted in
goodwill of $890.6 million, and the Creditex acquisition
during the year ended December 31, 2008, which resulted in
goodwill of $380.1 million (Note 3). The Company also
completed the acquisition of YellowJacket during the year ended
December 31, 2008 and the acquisitions of Commoditrack,
ChemConnect, ICE Futures Canada and Chatham during the year
ended December 31, 2007. The total amount of goodwill
113
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
expected to be deductible for tax purposes for the
Companys acquisitions is $15.1 million. The other
activity in the goodwill balance relates to adjustments to the
purchase price and related goodwill for acquisitions completed
in the prior years, primarily relating to updated valuations of
identified intangible assets, and to foreign currency
translation adjustments. The Company did not recognize any
impairment losses on goodwill during the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.
Other intangible assets and the related accumulated amortization
consisted of the following as of December 31, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
249,409
|
|
|
$
|
62,709
|
|
|
|
4 to 20
|
|
Russell licensing rights
|
|
|
149,796
|
|
|
|
149,796
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Trading products with finite lives
|
|
|
14,400
|
|
|
|
14,400
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
31,402
|
|
|
|
15,502
|
|
|
|
1 to 5
|
|
Technology
|
|
|
31,580
|
|
|
|
9,383
|
|
|
|
3 to 11
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,585
|
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
2 to 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
479,172
|
|
|
|
252,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(45,516
|
)
|
|
|
(15,754
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total finite-lived intangible assets, net
|
|
|
433,656
|
|
|
|
236,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading products with indefinite-lives
|
|
|
212,684
|
|
|
|
216,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
DCM/DCO designation for ICE Futures U.S.
|
|
|
68,300
|
|
|
|
68,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
14,215
|
|
|
|
15,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other indefinite-lived intangible assets
|
|
|
295,199
|
|
|
|
301,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other intangible assets, net
|
|
$
|
728,855
|
|
|
$
|
537,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Note 3 for a discussion of the $327.5 million in
other intangible assets relating to the ICE Futures
U.S. acquisition during the year ended December 31,
2007 and $215.4 million in other intangible assets relating
to the Creditex acquisition during the year ended
December 31, 2008. See Note 15 for a discussion of the
$149.8 million in Russell licensing rights. In addition to
the Creditex acquisition, the Company also increased the other
intangibles assets by $5.5 million during the year ended
December 31, 2008 relating to the YellowJacket acquisition
completed during the year ended December 31, 2008 and
updated valuations of identified intangible assets for
acquisition completed during the year ended December 31,
2007.
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
amortization of other intangible assets was $29.8 million,
$9.5 million and $648,000, respectively. Collectively, the
remaining weighted average useful lives of the finite-lived
intangible assets is 11.3 years. The Company expects future
amortization expense from other intangible assets as of
December 31, 2008 to be as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
63,354
|
|
2010
|
|
|
55,860
|
|
2011
|
|
|
54,642
|
|
2012
|
|
|
53,068
|
|
2013
|
|
|
52,377
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
154,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
433,656
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The Company has a senior unsecured credit agreement under which
a term loan facility in the aggregate principal amount of
$184.4 million is outstanding as of December 31, 2008,
and a revolving credit facility in the aggregate principal
amount of $250.0 million (collectively, the Credit
Facilities). Under the terms of the Credit Facilities, the
Company may borrow an aggregate principal amount of up to
$250.0 million under the revolving credit facility at any
time until its termination on January 12, 2010. The Company
has agreed to reserve $50.0 million of the
$250.0 million available under the revolving credit
facility for use by ICE Clear U.S., ICE Futures U.S.s
clearing organization, to provide short-term liquidity, if
necessary, in the event of default by a clearing member firm.
The Company borrowed $195.0 million under the revolving
credit facility during the three months ended September 30,
2008 and that amount is outstanding as of December 31,
2008. This amount was used by the Company for stock repurchases
(Note 10). The remaining amount under the revolving credit
facility, which is $5.0 million after factoring in the
$50.0 million reserved for ICE Clear U.S., could be used by
the Company for general corporate purposes.
Loans under the Credit Facilities shall, at the option of the
Company, bear interest on the principal amount outstanding at
either (i) LIBOR plus an applicable margin rate or
(ii) a base rate plus an applicable margin
rate. The base rate will be equal to the higher of
(i) Wachovia Bank, National Associations
(Wachovia) prime rate or (ii) the federal funds
rate plus 0.5%. The applicable margin rate ranges from 0.625% to
1.125% on the LIBOR loans and from 0.00% to 0.125% for the base
rate loans based on the Companys total leverage ratio
calculated on a trailing twelve month period. Interest on each
loan is payable quarterly. As of December 31, 2008, the
Company had a six-month LIBOR loan for $184.4 million
outstanding under the term loan facility with a stated interest
rate of 2.44% per annum, including the applicable margin rate at
December 31, 2008 of 0.625% on the LIBOR loan. For the
borrowings under the term loan facility, the Company began
making payments on June 30, 2007, and will make payments
quarterly thereafter until January 12, 2012, the fifth
anniversary of the closing date of the merger with ICE Futures
U.S. Aggregate principal maturities on this note over each
of the next four years are $46.9 million,
$50.0 million, $68.8 million and $18.7 million in
2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively. As of December 31,
2008, the Company had a six-month LIBOR loan for
$195.0 million outstanding under the revolving credit
facility with a stated interest rate of 3.60% per annum,
including the applicable margin rate at December 31, 2008
of 0.50% on the LIBOR loan. For the borrowings under the
revolving credit facility, any amount borrowed would need to be
repaid by January 12, 2010.
The Credit Facilities require the Company to use 100% of the net
cash proceeds raised from debt issuances or asset dispositions,
with certain limited exceptions, to prepay outstanding loans
under the Credit Facilities. With limited exceptions, the
Company may prepay the outstanding loans under the Credit
Facilities, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty. The
Credit Facilities contain affirmative and negative covenants,
including, but not limited to, leverage and interest coverage
ratios, as well as limitations or required approvals for
acquisitions, dispositions of assets and certain investments,
the incurrence of additional debt or the creation of liens and
other fundamental changes to the Companys business. The
Company has been and is currently in compliance with all
applicable covenants under the Credit Facilities.
On June 27, 2008, the Company entered into a separate
senior unsecured credit agreement (the Credit
Agreement) with Wachovia, as Administrative Agent, Bank of
America, N.A., as Syndication Agent, and the lenders named
therein. The Credit Agreement provides for a
364-day
revolving credit facility in the aggregate principal amount of
$150.0 million, which may be increased to
$200.0 million under certain conditions. The Credit
Agreement is available for operational use solely by ICE Clear
Europe, the Companys wholly-owned U.K. clearing house.
Loans under the Credit Agreement shall, at the option of the
Company, bear interest on the principal amount outstanding at
either (i) LIBOR plus an applicable margin rate or
(ii) a base rate plus an applicable margin
rate. The base rate will be equal to the higher of
(i) Wachovias prime rate or (ii) the federal
funds rate plus 0.5%. The applicable margin rate ranges from
1.50% to 2.50% on the LIBOR loans
115
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
and from 0.50% to 1.50% for the base rate loans based on the
Companys total leverage ratio calculated on a trailing
twelve month period. No amounts are outstanding under the
$150.0 million Credit Agreement as of December 31,
2008.
Stock
Option Plans
The Company has adopted the IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2000
Stock Option Plan (the 2000 Stock Option Plan). As
of December 31, 2008, there are 5,250,000 shares of
common stock reserved for issuance under the 2000 Stock Option
Plan, of which 45,282 shares are available for future
issuance as of December 31, 2008. The Company has also
adopted the IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive
Plan (the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan). The 2005
Equity Incentive Plan allows the Company to grant incentive
stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation
rights, restricted stock and restricted stock units. As of
December 31, 2008, there are 2,125,000 shares reserved
for issuance under the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, of which
903,320 shares are available for future issuance as of
December 31, 2008. In connection with the acquisition of
Creditex in August 2008 (Note 3), the Company assumed the
1999 Stock Options/Stock Issuance Plan of Creditex (the
Creditex Plan). Details of the Creditex Plan are discussed
below.
Stock options are granted at the discretion of the compensation
committee of the board of directors. All stock options are
granted at an exercise price equal to the fair value of the
common stock on the date of grant. The grant date fair value is
based on the closing stock price on the date of grant. The fair
value of the stock options on the date of grant is recognized as
expense ratably over the vesting period, net of estimated
forfeitures. The Company may grant, under provisions of the
plans, both incentive stock options and nonqualified stock
options. The options generally vest from three to four years,
but can vest at different intervals based on the compensation
committees determination. Generally, options may be
exercised up to ten years after the date of grant, but generally
expire 14 days after termination of employment. The
following is a summary of options for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Price per
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2006
|
|
|
4,787,418
|
|
|
$
|
9.51
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
170,654
|
|
|
|
100.38
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(2,510,481
|
)
|
|
|
8.80
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(142,683
|
)
|
|
|
8.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
2,304,908
|
|
|
|
17.05
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
108,126
|
|
|
|
180.63
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1,043,734
|
)
|
|
|
9.51
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(10,213
|
)
|
|
|
10.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,359,087
|
|
|
|
35.91
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,534,390
|
|
|
|
31.28
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(397,255
|
)
|
|
|
13.05
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(32,807
|
)
|
|
|
26.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
2,463,415
|
|
|
|
36.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Details of stock options outstanding as of December 31,
2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
Number of Options
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Vested or expected to vest
|
|
|
2,281,687
|
|
|
$
|
34.68
|
|
|
|
6.94
|
|
|
$
|
118,308
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
1,675,337
|
|
|
$
|
24.35
|
|
|
|
6.32
|
|
|
$
|
101,377
|
|
The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 were
$45.3 million, $143.6 million and $157.7 million,
respectively. As of December 31, 2008, there were
$28.7 million in total unrecognized compensation costs
related to stock options. These costs are expected to be
recognized over a weighted average period of 2.6 years as
the stock options vest.
Details of options outstanding as of December 31, 2008 are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ 4.19 - 12.00
|
|
|
878,429
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
874,944
|
|
17.57 - 35.08
|
|
|
851,398
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
627,498
|
|
45.84 - 81.25
|
|
|
499,820
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
48,320
|
|
104.23 - 138.80
|
|
|
138,200
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
91,106
|
|
156.78 - 189.43
|
|
|
95,568
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
33,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,463,415
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
1,675,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of the options outstanding at December 31, 2008, 1,675,337
were exercisable at a weighted-average exercise price of $24.35.
Of the options outstanding at December 31, 2007, 936,690
were exercisable at a weighted-average exercise price of $15.59.
Of the options outstanding at December 31, 2006, 1,346,834
were exercisable at a weighted-average exercise price of $9.17.
The Company completed its acquisition of Creditex on
August 29, 2008 (Note 3). In connection with the
acquisition, the Company assumed the stock option and restricted
stock plans of Creditex into the Companys stock award
plans. As a result, the Company exchanged its stock options and
restricted stock for Creditex stock options and restricted
stock. The fair value of the acquiring-company awards was less
than the fair value of the acquired-company awards. The Company
issued approximately 764,000 vested stock options to Creditex
employees. The Company issued approximately 636,000 unvested
stock option awards and approximately 179,000 unvested
restricted stock awards issued to Creditex employees and will
recognize non-cash compensation expense on a straight-line basis
as the awards vest based on the fair value of the awards on the
consummation date of the transaction on August 29, 2008.
These 1.4 million stock options issued are included in the
tables above as being granted during the year ended
December 31, 2008.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model for
purposes of valuing stock option awards. The Company has used
the Black-Scholes option pricing model weighted-average
assumptions in the table below to compute the value of all
options for shares of common stock granted to employees,
including options exchanged in connection with the acquisition
of Creditex:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
Assumptions
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.13
|
%
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
Expected life in years
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
|
|
49
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Estimated weighted-average fair value of options granted per
share
|
|
$
|
64.65
|
|
|
$
|
92.58
|
|
|
$
|
53.06
|
|
117
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The risk-free interest rate is based on the zero-coupon
U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.
Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of the
Companys stock. The expected life computation is derived
from historical exercise patterns and anticipated future
patterns. The decrease in the expected life assumption from
prior years is primarily a result of the expected short life of
awards exchanged in connection with the Creditex acquisition, as
well as the Companys historical exercise patterns.
Restricted
Stock Plans
The Company has adopted the IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2004
Restricted Stock Plan (the Restricted Plan). As of
December 31, 2008, there are 1,475,000 shares of
common stock reserved for issuance under the Restricted Plan, of
which 117,768 shares are available for future issuance as
of December 31, 2008.
The Company granted a maximum of 677,484, 398,013 and 407,661
time-based and performance-based restricted stock units under
the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan and the Restricted Plan during
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, including 211,589, 85,460 and 141,111 time-based
restricted stock units in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The
grant date fair value of each award is based on the closing
stock price at the date of grant. The fair value of the
time-based restricted stock units on the date of the grant is
recognized as expense ratably over the vesting period, net of
forfeitures. Granted but unvested shares would be forfeited upon
termination of employment. When restricted stock is forfeited,
compensation costs previously recognized for unvested shares are
reversed. Until the shares vest and are issued, the participants
have no voting or dividend rights and the shares may not be
sold, assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered.
Under SFAS No. 123(R), the Company will recognize
compensation costs, net of forfeitures, using an accelerated
attribution method over the vesting period for awards with
performance conditions. Compensation costs for such awards will
be recognized only if it is probable that the condition will be
satisfied. If the Company initially determines that it is not
probable that the performance condition will be satisfied and
later determines that it is probable that the performance
condition will be satisfied, or vice versa, the effect of the
change in estimate will be accounted for in the period of change
by recording a cumulative
catch-up
adjustment to retroactively apply the new estimate. The Company
would recognize the remaining compensation costs over the
remaining vesting period. The Companys compensation
committee, pursuant to the terms of the 2005 Equity Incentive
Plan and the authority delegated to it by the Companys
board of directors, can make equitable adjustments to the
performance condition in recognition of unusual or non-recurring
events.
In December 2008, the Company reserved a maximum of 465,895
restricted shares for potential issuance as performance-based
restricted shares for certain Company employees. These
restricted shares are also subject to a market condition that
may reduce the number of shares that are granted if the 2009
Company total shareholder return falls below that of the Dow
Jones Global Exchanges Index. The number of shares granted will
be reduced by either 10% or 20% if the 2009 Company total
shareholder return is below the 2009 return of the Dow Jones
Global Exchange Index. These shares vest over a three-year
period based on the Companys financial performance targets
set by the Companys compensation committee for the year
ending December 31, 2009. The potential compensation
expenses to be recognized under these performance-based
restricted shares are expected to be $6.3 million if the
Threshold Performance Target is met and 93,179 shares vest,
$12.7 million if the Target Performance Target is met and
186,358 shares vest, $22.2 million if the Above Target
Performance Target is met and 326,127 shares vest, and
$31.7 million if the Maximum Performance Target is met and
465,895 shares vest. Shares to be granted will be prorated
on a straight-line basis between performance level targets. The
Company will recognize expense on an accelerated basis over the
three-year vesting period beginning January 1, 2009 based
on the Companys quarterly assessment of the probable 2009
actual performance as compared to the 2009 financial performance
targets.
In December 2007, the Company reserved a maximum of 309,913
restricted shares for potential issuance as performance-based
restricted shares for certain Company employees. These
restricted shares were subject to
118
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
a market condition that reduced the number of shares that were
granted since the 2008 Company total shareholder return fell
below that of the S&P 500 Index. Based on the actual
shareholder return for the year ended December 31, 2008
compared to the S&P 500 Index, the Company reduced the
number of shares granted by 20%. These shares vest over a
three-year period based on the Companys financial
performance targets set by the Companys compensation
committee for the year ending December 31, 2008. As of
December 31, 2008, the Company determined that the 96.8%
target level was achieved for this award and 88,590 restricted
shares were granted. The Company recorded non-cash compensation
expenses in the accompanying consolidated statement of income of
$9.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008
relating to this performance-based plan. The remaining
$6.2 million in non-cash compensation expenses will be
expensed on an accelerated basis over the remaining two-year
vesting period.
In December 2006, the Company reserved a maximum of 269,190
restricted shares for potential issuance as performance-based
restricted shares for certain Company employees, of which
207,382 restricted shares were ultimately granted based on the
Companys financial performance targets set by the
Companys compensation committee for the year ended
December 31, 2007. These shares vest over a three-year
period. Non-cash compensation expenses recorded in the
accompanying consolidated statements of income related to this
performance-based plan were $5.1 million and
$11.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively, and the remaining $2.0 million in
non-cash compensation expenses will be expensed during the year
ended December 31, 2009.
The Company has adopted the IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2003
Restricted Stock Deferral Plan for Outside Directors (the
Director Plan). Directors can elect to receive up to
100% of their board compensation in restricted stock or
restricted stock units. The restricted stock generally vests
over a three-year period. As of December 31, 2008 there are
250,000 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under
the Director Plan. Under the Director Plan, the compensation
committee reserved a number of the Companys common stock
treasury shares sufficient to cover the current obligations
under the Director Plan for issuance to the board of directors
in lieu of fees otherwise payable in cash. During the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, 628, 947 and
5,043 shares, respectively, of restricted stock and
restricted stock units were granted to members of the board of
directors under the Director Plan.
Restricted shares are used as an incentive to attract and retain
qualified senior officers and to increase shareholder returns
with actual performance-based awards based on enhanced
shareholder value. The restricted plans include a change in
control provision that may accelerate vesting on both the
time-based and performance-based restricted shares if employment
is terminated or if the individual resigns for good
reason
119
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
within 12 months after the effective date of a change in
control. The following is a summary of the nonvested restricted
shares under all plans discussed above for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Grant-Date Fair
|
|
|
|
Stock Shares
|
|
|
Value per Share
|
|
|
Nonvested at January 1, 2006
|
|
|
1,271,474
|
|
|
$
|
9.01
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
349,521
|
|
|
|
89.29
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(213,391
|
)
|
|
|
(9.78
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(68,535
|
)
|
|
|
(8.31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
1,339,069
|
|
|
|
29.87
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
199,159
|
|
|
|
165.27
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(268,998
|
)
|
|
|
(21.91
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(32,276
|
)
|
|
|
(38.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,236,954
|
|
|
|
53.19
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
857,265
|
|
|
|
84.80
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(898,927
|
)
|
|
|
(26.58
|
)
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(30,694
|
)
|
|
|
(103.62
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,164,598
|
|
|
|
95.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock shares granted in the table above include both
time-based and performance-based grants. Performance based
shares awarded in prior years have been adjusted to reflect the
actual shares to be issued based on the achievement of past
performance targets. Unvested performance-based restricted
shares granted are presented in the table above at the maximum
number of restricted shares that would vest if the maximum
performance targets are met. As of December 31, 2008, there
were $34.7 million in total unrecognized compensation costs
related to the time-based restricted stock and the
performance-based restricted stock. These costs are expected to
be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.1 years
as the restricted stock vests. During the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the total fair value of
restricted stock vested under all restricted stock plans was
$137.6 million, $41.0 million and $14.5 million,
respectively.
Treasury
Stock
During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
the Company received 294,854, 180,601 and 68,654 shares,
respectively, of common stock from certain employees of the
Company related to tax withholdings made by the Company on the
employees behalf. The Company recorded the receipt of the
shares as treasury stock. The Company also issued 629,444,
404,740 and 135,370 shares of treasury stock during the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively,
under the Director Plan and the Restricted Plan. During the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the
Companys compensation committee reserved 628, 947 and
5,043 treasury shares, respectively, for potential issuance
under the Director Plan. Treasury stock activity is presented in
the accompanying consolidated statements of changes in
shareholders equity.
Stock
Repurchase Program
On August 4, 2008, the Company announced that its board of
directors authorized the repurchase of up to $500.0 million
of the Companys outstanding common stock over a twelve
month period. After the completion of the Creditex acquisition,
the Company repurchased 3.2 million shares of the
Companys common stock at a cost of $300.0 million on
the open market through December 31, 2008 at an average
price per common share of $93.16. The shares are being held in
treasury as of December 31, 2008. Additional common shares
may be
120
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
repurchased under this authorization from time to time, with
consideration given to the market price of the common shares,
the nature of the Companys investment opportunities, cash
flows from operations and general economic conditions. The
Company expects to fund any future share repurchases with a
combination of cash on hand and future cash flows from
operations. The Company is not obligated to acquire any specific
number of shares and may amend, suspend or terminate the
repurchase program at any time.
Redeemable
Stock Put
The Creditex stock awards assumed by the Company include 35,937
vested and unvested stock options of the Company and 1,103
unvested restricted stock of the Company, as well at 16,388
common stock shares of the Company, that are held by a Creditex
employee which were covered by a put agreement. The put
agreement allowed the employee, under certain circumstances, the
right to require the Company to purchase the Companys
common stock held by the employee for an amount equal to the
fair market value of the stock at the date the put was
exercised. The employee had the right to exercise the put option
if the employee was employed through a certain date and upon the
termination of employment. The Company initially recorded the
redeemable stock put at its redemption value at the
August 29, 2008 acquisition date of Creditex and has
adjusted it to this redemption amount at each subsequent balance
sheet date.
The redemption amount for the common stock held by this employee
in excess of six months was $1.1 million as of
December 31, 2008 and is recorded as redeemable stock put
in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The redemption
amount for the common stock held by this employee less than six
months and for the vested and unvested stock options and
restricted stock was $2.1 million as of December 31,
2008 and is recorded as an other current liability in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The adjustment to the
redemption amount has been recorded directly to retained
earnings for the common stock classified as temporary equity and
to operating expenses for awards and stock classified as a
liability.
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
income before income taxes from domestic operations was
$319.6 million, $192.3 million and
$144.2 million, respectively, and income before income
taxes from foreign operations was $153.9 million,
$166.1 million and $68.3 million, respectively.
Details of the income tax provision in the accompanying
consolidated statements of income for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Current tax expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
140,233
|
|
|
$
|
72,623
|
|
|
$
|
44,576
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
49,277
|
|
|
|
48,144
|
|
|
|
30,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189,510
|
|
|
|
120,767
|
|
|
|
74,935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax expense (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
(11,609
|
)
|
|
|
(4,393
|
)
|
|
|
(2,370
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(5,377
|
)
|
|
|
1,448
|
|
|
|
(3,290
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,986
|
)
|
|
|
(2,945
|
)
|
|
|
(5,660
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tax expense
|
|
$
|
172,524
|
|
|
$
|
117,822
|
|
|
$
|
69,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying
amount of assets and liabilities in the consolidated financial
statements and their respective tax bases which give rise to
deferred tax assets (liabilities) as of December 31, 2008
and 2007 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred and stock-based compensation
|
|
$
|
10,998
|
|
|
$
|
7,478
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
12,119
|
|
|
|
9,904
|
|
Tax credits
|
|
|
7,130
|
|
|
|
8,446
|
|
NOL carryforward
|
|
|
4,209
|
|
|
|
1,888
|
|
NCDEX impairment
|
|
|
4,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5,765
|
|
|
|
3,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
44,698
|
|
|
|
31,114
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(5,078
|
)
|
|
|
(2,718
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance
|
|
|
39,620
|
|
|
|
28,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
(5,748
|
)
|
|
|
(6,772
|
)
|
Acquired intangibles
|
|
|
(213,358
|
)
|
|
|
(122,642
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(2,429
|
)
|
|
|
(2,813
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(221,535
|
)
|
|
|
(132,227
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(181,915
|
)
|
|
|
(103,831
|
)
|
Net current deferred tax assets
|
|
|
7,909
|
|
|
|
4,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net noncurrent deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
(189,824
|
)
|
|
$
|
(108,739
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company has excess
foreign tax credits of $2.7 million and $1.2 million,
respectively, for tax purposes which are expected to offset
future tax liabilities. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
the Company has net operating loss carryforwards of
$16.5 million and $13.0 million, respectively, for
state and local tax purposes, which will be available to offset
future taxable income. If not used, these carryforwards will
begin to expire in 2026. In addition, as of December 31,
2008, the Company has a net operating loss carryforward of
$12.7 million related to Creditexs Singapore
operations which is not expected to be utilized prior to
expiration. The Company recognized a valuation allowance for
deferred tax assets of $5.1 million and $2.7 million
as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The
valuation allowance is due to excess state tax credits and
Singapore net operating loss carryforwards that are available to
offset future taxes.
A reconciliation of the statutory U.S. federal income tax
rate to the Companys effective income tax rate for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Statutory federal income tax rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State income taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Tax credits
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
Foreign tax rate differential
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for income taxes
|
|
|
36.4
|
%
|
|
|
32.9
|
%
|
|
|
32.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2008
is higher than the federal statutory rate primarily due to state
taxes and non-deductible expenses, which are partially offset by
favorable foreign income tax rates, tax exempt interest income
and tax credits. The effective tax rate for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 is lower than the federal
statutory rate primarily due to favorable foreign income tax
rates, tax exempt interest income and tax credits, which are
partially offset by state taxes and non-deductible expenses. The
effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2008 is
higher than the effective tax rate for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 primarily due to an increase in
the percentage of income taxable in the United States at higher
statutory tax rates in 2008 and the tax benefit recognized in
2007 and 2006 under the indefinite reinvestment exception of APB
Opinion No. 23, Accounting for Income Taxes-Special
Areas.
The undistributed earnings of the Companys foreign
subsidiaries that have not been remitted to the United States
totaled $363.4 million and $209.5 million as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007. These earnings are not subject
to U.S. income tax until they are distributed to the United
States. Historically, the Company has provided for deferred
U.S. federal income taxes on these undistributed earnings
in the accompanying consolidated statements of income as they
were determined not to be indefinitely reinvested. However,
during the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company
determined in accordance with APB No. 23, that
$51.0 million of the undistributed earnings are
indefinitely reinvested, primarily related to the cost method
investment made during the fourth quarter of 2006 (Note 6).
Also during the three months ended March 31, 2007, the
Company determined that $31.2 million of the undistributed
earnings will be indefinitely reinvested, primarily relating to
the cash required to establish and to fund the new European
clearing house that the Company began operating in the fourth
quarter of 2008. The undistributed earnings that had been
indefinitely reinvested total $82.3 million and
$51.0 million as of March 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, respectively. During the three months
ended June 30, 2007, the Company further determined that
all prior undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries
will be indefinitely reinvested. The Company made this
determination on the basis of sufficient evidence that
demonstrates that it will invest the undistributed earnings
overseas indefinitely. Under APB Opinion No. 23, when it
becomes apparent that some or all of the undistributed earnings
of a foreign subsidiary on which income taxes have been accrued
in the past will not be remitted in the foreseeable future, then
the parent company should adjust income tax expense of the
current period to reflect this change. The Company reduced tax
expense by $3.6 million and $4.8 million for the years
ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, to reflect
the decision to indefinitely reinvest these prior undistributed
earnings. Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred
U.S. income tax liability on the undistributed earnings of
the Companys foreign subsidiaries is not practical.
123
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of
unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
13,173
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to current year
|
|
|
2,570
|
|
Additions based on tax positions in prior years
|
|
|
1,659
|
|
Reductions based on tax positions related to current year
|
|
|
(3,365
|
)
|
Reductions based on tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
Reductions resulting from statute of limitation lapses
|
|
|
(1,894
|
)
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
11,963
|
|
Additions related to acquisitions
|
|
|
5,217
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to current year
|
|
|
1,409
|
|
Additions based on tax positions in prior years
|
|
|
117
|
|
Reductions based on tax positions related to current year
|
|
|
(370
|
)
|
Reductions based on tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
(2,473
|
)
|
Reductions resulting from statute of limitation lapses
|
|
|
(193
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
15,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of the adoption date of FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, on
January 1, 2007, the Company had unrecognized tax benefits
of $13.2 million of which $5.0 million, if recognized,
would affect the effective tax rate. The Company recorded an
increase to unrecognized tax benefits of $3.7 million and a
decrease of $1.2 million as of December 31, 2008 and
2007, respectively, of which approximately $915,000 and
$2.4 million increased income tax expense for the years
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. As of
December 31, 2008, the Company had unrecognized tax
benefits of $15.7 million, of which $7.4 million, if
recognized, would affect the effective tax rate. As of
December 31, 2007, the Company had unrecognized tax
benefits of $12.0 million, of which $4.6 million, if
recognized, would affect the effective tax rate. The Company
recognizes interest accrued related to income tax uncertainties
as a component of interest expense. Any related penalties, if
incurred, would be included in selling, general and
administrative expenses. Interest expense related to the
unrecognized tax benefits totaled $727,000 and $478,000 for the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Accrued interest and penalties were $3.6 million and
$1.9 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
The Company currently anticipates the amount of unrecognized tax
benefits to decrease by $4.6 million by December 31,
2009. The unrecognized tax benefit, related to research and
development and investment tax credits claimed, settlement
payments and the classification of income, would decrease due to
the closing of the related statue of limitations of the
jurisdiction where reported and the filing of tax returns. The
Company or one of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in
the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and various state and
foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no
longer subject to U.S. federal, state, local or foreign
examinations by tax authorities for years before 2005.
Related-parties include principal owners of the Company and
other parties that control or can significantly influence the
management or operating policies of the Company. Principal
owners include any party that owns more than 10% of the voting
interest in or common stock of the Company. The Company
previously had two shareholders who held more than 10% of the
common stock of the Company and who were considered to be
124
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
related-parties. In connection with the Companys secondary
offering of common stock on July 21, 2006, the voting
interest of the two shareholders of the Company who previously
held more than 10% of the common stock of the Company fell below
the 10% threshold. Therefore, beginning on July 21, 2006,
these two shareholders are no longer considered related-parties
for disclosure purposes. The Company has also classified all
companies that had board of director participation as a
related-party due to their significant influence over the
Company. Prior to March 18, 2008, the Company licensed its
technology to an entity whose founder and Chief Executive
Officer was also a member of the Companys board of
directors. On March 18, 2008, this director resigned from
the Companys board and this company is no longer
considered to be a related party and the Company no longer has
any related party transactions. Revenues earned from
related-parties of the Company totaled $680,000,
$1.7 million and $16.1 million for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
|
|
13.
|
Unearned
Government Grant
|
In November 2002, ICE Futures U.S. entered into a ten-year
agreement with the New York State Urban Development Corporation
d/b/a Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC).
As a result of the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center
on September 11, 2001, the ESDC, in cooperation with the
New York City Economic Development Corporation d/b/a New York
City Industrial Development Agency, determined that ICE Futures
U.S. was eligible for assistance under the World Trade
Center Job Creation and Retention Program. In November 2002, ICE
Futures U.S. received a cash grant of $23.3 million
for fixed asset investment. This agreement requires ICE Futures
U.S. to maintain certain annual employment levels in a
certain geographic area of New York City and the grant is
subject to recapture amounts on a declining scale over a ten
year term if ICE Futures U.S. employment levels fall below
the minimum level. The grant is recognized in the income
statement ratably in accordance with the ten-year recapture
schedule as a credit to depreciation and amortization expense.
As of December 31, 2008, the potential recapture amount
decreased to $8.7 million and was scheduled to decrease by
$1.7 million at the end of each fiscal year for the next
five years. However, the Company has calculated that as of
December 31, 2008, the ICE Futures U.S. annual
employment levels have fallen below the minimum level required
per the agreement and it will be required to pay the recapture
amount. Accordingly, the full amount of the unamortized grant
proceeds of $8.7 million is classified as a current
liability in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2008 and this amount was paid in January 2009.
|
|
14.
|
Clearing
Organizations
|
ICE Clear U.S. performs the clearing and settlement of
every futures and options contract traded through ICE Futures
U.S., ICE Clear Canada performs the same function for every
futures and options contract traded through ICE Futures Canada
and ICE Clear Europe performs the same function for every
futures and options contract traded through ICE Futures Europe
and for all of the Companys cleared OTC energy products.
ICE Clear Europe began clearing contracts in November 2008 upon
the transition of clearing from LCH.Clearnet Ltd. ICE Clear
U.S., ICE Clear Europe and ICE Clear Canada are referred to
herein collectively as the ICE Clearing Houses.
Each of the ICE Clearing Houses has equal and offsetting claims
to and from their respective clearing members on opposite sides
of each contract, standing as the central financial counterparty
on every contract cleared. To the extent that funds are not
otherwise available to satisfy an obligation under an applicable
contract, each ICE Clearing House bears financial counterparty
credit risk in the event that future market movements create
conditions that could lead to its clearing members failing to
meet their obligations to that ICE Clearing House. Accordingly,
the ICE Clearing Houses account for this central counterparty
guarantee as a performance guarantee under FIN 45,
Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for
Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of
Others an interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57, and
107 and rescission of FASB interpretation No. 34
(FIN 45). Given that each contract is
settled on at least a
125
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
daily basis for each clearing member, the ICE Clearing
Houses maximum exposure for this guarantee is
approximately $22 billion as of December 31, 2008,
which represents the maximum estimated value by the ICE Clearing
Houses of a one to two day movement in pricing of the underlying
unsettled contracts. This amount is based on calculations
determined using proprietary software that simulates gains and
losses based on historical market prices, volatility and other
factors present at that point in time for those particular
unsettled contracts. Future actual market price volatility could
result in the exposure being significantly different than the
amount estimated by the ICE Clearing Houses. The net notional
value of the unsettled contracts was approximately
$64 billion as of December 31, 2008.
The Company performed calculations to determine the fair value
of a FIN 45 liability as of December 31, 2008 taking
into consideration factors such as daily settlement of
contracts, margining requirements, other elements of the
Companys risk management program, historical evidence of
default payments, and estimated probability of potential default
payouts by the ICE Clearing Houses. Based on these analyses, the
estimated FIN 45 liability was determined to be nominal and
no liability was recorded as of December 31, 2008.
The ICE Clearing Houses reduce their exposure through a risk
management program that includes initial and ongoing financial
standards for admission as a clearing member, original and
variation margin requirements and mandatory deposits to a
guaranty fund. The standardized amounts that the clearing
members are required to maintain in the original margin and
Guaranty Fund accounts are determined by parameters established
by the margin committees, risk management departments and the
boards of directors of each of the ICE Clearing Houses and may
fluctuate over time. The ICE Clearing Houses also have powers of
assessment that provide the ability to collect additional funds
from their clearing members to cover a defaulting members
remaining obligations. ICE Clear Europe has also set up
$100 million of insurance in the event of a clearing member
default and this would be called upon prior to any member
assessment.
Each of the ICE Clearing Houses requires all clearing members to
maintain on deposit or through pledge with it cash, money market
mutual fund shares, Government obligations or letters of credit
to secure payment of variation margin as may become due from the
clearing members, and such amounts in total are known as
original margin. The daily payment of profits and losses from
and to the ICE Clearing Houses in respect of relevant contracts
are known as variation margin. ICE Clear U.S. marks all
outstanding futures contracts to market at least twice daily and
pays and collects option premiums daily. ICE Clear Europe and
ICE Clear Canada mark all outstanding positions to market at
least once per day.
Each of the ICE Clearing Houses requires that each clearing
member make deposits in a fund known as a guaranty or clearing
fund (Guaranty Fund), which is maintained by the
relevant ICE Clearing House. These amounts serve to secure the
obligations of a clearing member to the ICE Clearing House to
which it has made the Guaranty Fund deposits and may be used to
cover losses sustained by the respective ICE Clearing House in
the event of a default of a clearing member. For ICE Clear
U.S. and ICE Clear Canada, all income earned from investing
clearing members cash deposits in the Guaranty Fund, and
for ICE Clear U.S., all income earned from the cash variation
margin deposits, belongs to the respective ICE Clearing House
and is included in interest income in the accompanying
consolidated statements of income and all other interest earned
on the cash margin deposits belong to the clearing members. ICE
Clear Europe has agreed to pay clearing members all interest
earned on their cash margin deposits plus an additional
115 basis points on cash deposits made to the Guaranty Fund
and an additional 10 basis points for cash deposits made
for original margin requirements. These additional basis points
amounts paid to the clearing members are recorded net against
revenue in the accompanying consolidated statement of income for
the year ended December 31, 2008.
Should a particular clearing member fail to deposit original
margin, or to make a variation margin payment, when and as
required, the relevant ICE Clearing House may liquidate the
clearing members open positions and use the clearing
members original margin and Guaranty Fund deposits to make
up the amount owed. In the event that those deposits are not
sufficient to pay that owed amount in full, ICE Clear
U.S. and ICE Clear Canada may utilize the Guaranty Fund
deposits of all clearing members pro rata for that purpose.
126
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
For ICE Clear Europe, once a clearing members deposits are
depleted and a default occurs, a $100.0 million
contribution made by the Company to ICE Clear Europe would be
utilized. The $100.0 million is solely available in the
event of an ICE Clear Europe clearing member default and
$50.0 million of the $100.0 million will be utilized
after the available funds of the defaulting member but before
all other amounts within the Guaranty Fund. If additional cash
is required to settle positions, then the remaining
$50.0 million will be called pro-rata along with other
non-defaulting ICE Clear Europe clearing members deposits
in the Guaranty Fund. Additionally, for ICE Clear Europe, if all
Guaranty Fund amounts are depleted, proceeds from the
Companys $100.0 million insurance policy would be
utilized. In addition, the relevant ICE Clearing House may
assess its clearing members to meet any remaining shortfall. As
of December 31, 2008, original margin, unsettled variation
margin and Guaranty Fund cash deposits are as follows for ICE
Clear U.S., ICE Clear Europe and ICE Clear Canada (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICE Clear U.S.
|
|
|
ICE Clear Europe
|
|
|
ICE Clear Canada
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Original margin
|
|
$
|
1,815,532
|
|
|
$
|
9,872,269
|
|
|
$
|
11,023
|
|
|
$
|
11,698,824
|
|
Variation margin
|
|
|
11,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,325
|
|
Guaranty Fund
|
|
|
22,914
|
|
|
|
381,877
|
|
|
|
2,880
|
|
|
|
407,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,849,771
|
|
|
$
|
10,254,146
|
|
|
$
|
13,903
|
|
|
$
|
12,117,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007, original margin, unsettled
variation margin and Guaranty Fund cash deposits are as follows
for ICE Clear U.S. and ICE Clear Canada (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICE Clear U.S.
|
|
|
ICE Clear Canada
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Original margin
|
|
$
|
774,593
|
|
|
$
|
6,936
|
|
|
$
|
781,529
|
|
Variation margin
|
|
|
7,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,895
|
|
Guaranty Fund
|
|
|
1,768
|
|
|
|
860
|
|
|
|
2,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
784,256
|
|
|
$
|
7,796
|
|
|
$
|
792,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has recorded these cash deposits in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets as current assets with offsetting
current liabilities to the clearing members of the relevant ICE
Clearing House. All cash, securities and letters of credit are
only available to meet the financial obligations of that
clearing firm to the relevant ICE Clearing House. ICE Clear
U.S., ICE Clear Europe and ICE Clear Canada are separate legal
entities and are not subject to the liabilities of the other ICE
Clearing Houses or the obligations of the members of the other
ICE Clearing Houses. These cash deposits may fluctuate due to
the types of margin collateral choices available to clearing
members and the change in the amount of deposits required. As a
result, these assets and offsetting liabilities may vary
significantly over time.
The ICE Clearing Houses have credit risk for maintaining the
cash deposits at various financial institutions. The deposits at
times may be in excess of federally insured limits. The ICE
Clearing Houses monitor the cash deposits and mitigate credit
risk by keeping such deposits in several financial institutions.
If the cash deposits decrease in value, the ICE Clearing Houses
would be liable for the losses. The ICE Clearing Houses have not
experienced losses related to these cash deposits.
The total ICE Clear Europe Guaranty Fund balance as of
December 31, 2008 is $482.9 million. This includes the
$382.9 million in Guaranty Fund deposits from clearing
members as well as $100.0 million that ICE Clear Europe has
committed of its own cash. As discussed in Note 4, the
$100.0 million is reflected in restricted cash in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
2008.
In addition to the cash deposits for original margin, variation
margin, and Guaranty Fund made to the relevant ICE Clearing
House, clearing members also pledge assets, including Government
obligations, money market mutual funds and letters of credit to
the relevant ICE Clearing House to mitigate its credit risk.
These
127
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
assets are held in safekeeping and any interest and gain or loss
for ICE Clear U.S. and ICE Clear Canada accrues to the
clearing member. However, ICE Clear Europe has agreed to pay
clearing members all interest earned on their non-cash margin
deposits plus an additional 50 basis points on non-cash
deposits made to the Guaranty Fund and ICE Clear Europe will
charge clearing members 5 basis points for non-cash
deposits made for original margin requirements. These additional
basis points amounts paid to the clearing members are recorded
net against revenue in the accompanying consolidated statement
of income for the year ended December 31, 2008. These
assets are not reflected in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet as the ICE Clearing Houses do not take legal
ownership of the assets as the risks and rewards remain with the
clearing members. The ICE Clearing Houses have the ability to
access the accounts where these assets are held at the financial
institutions and depositories in the event of a clearing member
default.
As of December 31, 2008, the U.S. Government
obligations and money market mutual funds pledged by the
clearing members as original margin and Guaranty Fund deposits
for ICE Clear U.S. are detailed below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government
|
|
|
Money
|
|
|
|
Securities at
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
|
Face Value
|
|
|
Mutual Fund
|
|
|
Original margin
|
|
$
|
8,238,542
|
|
|
$
|
580,906
|
|
Guaranty Fund
|
|
|
137,596
|
|
|
|
24,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
8,376,138
|
|
|
$
|
605,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008, the Government obligations pledged
by the clearing members as original margin and Guaranty Fund
deposits for ICE Clear Europe are detailed below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities at
|
|
|
Letters
|
|
|
|
Face Value
|
|
|
of Credit
|
|
|
Original margin
|
|
$
|
4,803,718
|
|
|
$
|
1,270,000
|
|
Guaranty Fund
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,804,718
|
|
|
$
|
1,270,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008, the Canadian Government
obligations and letters of credit pledged by the clearing
members as original margin and Guaranty Fund deposits for ICE
Clear Canada are detailed below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities at
|
|
|
Letters
|
|
|
|
Face Value
|
|
|
of Credit
|
|
|
Original margin
|
|
$
|
55,842
|
|
|
$
|
5,311
|
|
Guaranty Fund
|
|
|
22,611
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
78,453
|
|
|
$
|
5,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of December 31, 2007, the U.S. Government
obligations and money market mutual funds pledged by the
clearing members as original margin and Guaranty Fund deposits
for ICE Clear U.S. are detailed below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government
|
|
|
Money
|
|
|
|
Securities at
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
|
Face Value
|
|
|
Mutual Fund
|
|
|
Original margin
|
|
$
|
3,139,010
|
|
|
$
|
834,310
|
|
Guaranty Fund
|
|
|
94,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,233,453
|
|
|
$
|
834,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007, the Canadian Government
obligations and letters of credit pledged by the clearing
members as original margin and Guaranty Fund deposits for ICE
Clear Canada are detailed below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities at
|
|
|
Letters
|
|
|
|
Face Value
|
|
|
of Credit
|
|
|
Original margin
|
|
$
|
40,897
|
|
|
$
|
18,925
|
|
Guaranty Fund
|
|
|
17,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
58,648
|
|
|
$
|
18,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICE Clear U.S. and the Options Clearing Corporation
(OCC) have entered into a cross-margin agreement,
whereby a common clearing firm, or a pair of affiliated clearing
firms, may maintain a cross-margin account in which positions in
certain of ICE Clear U.S.s futures and options are
combined with certain positions cleared by OCC for purposes of
calculating margin requirements of the clearing firms. The
margin deposits are held jointly by ICE Clear U.S. and OCC.
Cross-margin cash, securities and letters of credit jointly held
with OCC under the cross-margin agreement are reflected at 50%
of the total, or ICE Clear U.S.s proportionate share, in
accordance with the agreement. As of December 31, 2008, the
margin deposits in the joint account were $167.0 million of
which $83.5 million is ICE Clear U.S.s proportionate
share and the entire $83.5 million is reflected in the
pledged asset margin balances above. Clearing firms maintain
separate margin requirements with each clearing house. Depending
on the impact resulting from offsetting positions between ICE
Clear U.S. and OCC, each clearing house may reduce that
firms margin requirements. Cross margin deposits are held
in a joint custody account controlled by ICE Clear U.S. and
OCC. If a participating firm defaults, the gain or loss on the
liquidation of the firms open position and the proceeds
from the liquidation of the cross-margin account will be split
50% each to ICE Clear U.S. and OCC. The cross-margining
arrangement reduces capital costs for clearing firms and
eligible customers. The agreement permits a participating
clearing house to recognize a clearing firms open
positions at another participating clearing house, and clearing
firms are able to offset risks of positions held at one clearing
house against those held at another participating clearing
house, with respect to particular accounts.
129
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
15.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Leases
The Company leases office space, equipment facilities, and
certain computer equipment. As of December 31, 2008, future
minimum lease payments under these noncancelable operating
agreements are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
15,525
|
|
2010
|
|
|
14,345
|
|
2011
|
|
|
14,198
|
|
2012
|
|
|
12,709
|
|
2013
|
|
|
9,529
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
5,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
71,806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company had capital lease obligations of $3.7 million
as of December 31, 2008 and no capital lease obligations as
of December 31, 2007. The amortization of assets recorded
under capital leases is included in depreciation expense in the
accompanying consolidated statements of income and totaled
$176,000 for the year ended December 31, 2008. Rental
expense amounted to $13.9 million, $11.8 million and
$4.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006, respectively.
Russell
Licensing Agreement
On June 15, 2007, the Company entered into an exclusive
licensing agreement (the Licensing Agreement) with
the Frank Russell Company (Russell) to offer futures
and options on futures contracts based on the full range of
Russells benchmark U.S. equity indexes. Due to the
wind-down provisions of other Russell licensing contracts,
during the first year of the Licensing Agreement, the Company
offered the Russell contracts on a non-exclusive basis. These
rights became exclusive on September 19, 2008, and subject
to achieving specified trading volumes, will remain exclusive
throughout the remainder of the Licensing Agreement, which
extends through June 2014. Beginning three years after the
effective date of the Licensing Agreement, the Company will be
required to maintain a minimum level of average trading volume
per quarter to preserve the exclusive rights granted to it under
the Licensing Agreement.
In exchange for the license rights, the Company paid Russell
$50.0 million in July 2007 and will also make annual
royalty payments based on the annual contract trade volumes,
subject to certain minimum annual royalty payments. The Company
has recorded the license rights as intangible assets, which were
valued based on the net present value of all minimum annual
royalty payments that the Company is required to make to Russell
throughout the term of the agreement. As of December 31,
2008 and 2007, the net assets related to the Licensing Agreement
are $142.5 million and $149.7 million, respectively,
and are included in other intangible assets in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets. The intangible assets are being
amortized based on the Companys valuations of the
non-exclusive and the exclusive elements of the Licensing
Agreement. For the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
amortization expense related to the Licensing Agreement was
$7.2 million and $83,000, respectively, which reflects
amortization on the non-exclusive and exclusive portions of the
intangible assets. The exclusive period commenced on
September 19, 2008 as noted above.
Because the Company is required to make minimum annual royalty
payments in order to maintain the Russell license rights, the
Company has also recorded a liability based on the net present
value of the total required minimum royalty payments as of the
effective date of the Licensing Agreement. As of
December 31, 2008, the current and noncurrent liabilities
relating to the minimum annual royalty payments under the
Licensing Agreement are $12.7 million and
$83.0 million, respectively, and are reflected as licensing
agreement liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheet. As of December 31, 2007, the current
130
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
and noncurrent liabilities relating to the minimum annual
royalty payments of the Licensing Agreement are
$10.6 million and $89.6 million, respectively. The
difference between the present value of the payments and the
actual payments is recorded as interest expense using the
effective interest method over the term of the Licensing
Agreement. For the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
interest expense related to the Licensing Agreement was
$6.0 million and $3.1 million, respectively.
Patent
Licensing Agreement
In 2002, the Company entered into a long-term, non-exclusive
licensing agreement with eSpeed, Inc. (eSpeed),
which granted the use of eSpeeds patent to the Company and
its majority-owned and controlled affiliates. Under the
agreement, the Company was required to pay minimum annual
license fees of $2.0 million beginning in April 2002
through the expiration date of the patent in February 2007 along
with additional royalty payments calculated quarterly based upon
the volume of certain futures transactions executed on the
electronic platform. The Company recorded amortization expense
of $283,000 and $2.2 million during the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 respectively, relating to the
licensing agreement. The Company paid royalty payments of
$1.7 million and $9.0 million during the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, which were
recorded as patent royalty expenses in the accompanying
consolidated statements of income. The licensing agreement and
related patent expired in February 2007 and no future payments
are required.
Employment
Agreements
The Company has entered into employment agreements with all of
its corporate officers. If the corporate officers are terminated
without cause, the employment agreements result in separation
payments ranging from six months to three years of the corporate
officers annual base salary. In some cases, the employment
agreements also stipulate an additional payment for bonus
compensation for the balance of the term of the employment
agreement. Also, certain employment agreements have provisions
that provide for termination payments following a change of
control and corresponding loss of employment, which generally
provide for base salary, bonus payment, benefits continuation
for the full term of the employment agreement (ranging from one
to three years), gross up payment for any excise taxes due under
Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and the
acceleration of vesting of any stock options granted after the
execution of the employment agreements. The Companys U.K.
subsidiaries, in accordance with normal U.K. practice, have
entered into employment agreements with all of its employees.
The employment agreements require a severance notice ranging
from one to six months.
Legal
Proceedings
On April 6, 2007, the Supreme Court of the State of New
York, County of New York, granted ICE Futures U.S.s motion
to dismiss all claims brought against it in an action commenced
on December 8, 2006 by certain holders of non-equity
trading permits (Permit Holders) of ICE Futures
U.S. The plaintiffs alleged that, in violation of purported
contract rights
and/or
rights under New Yorks Not-For-Profit Corporation Law, ICE
Futures U.S. had not allowed its Permit Holders, including
plaintiffs, to vote on the merger pursuant to which the Company
acquired ICE Futures U.S. and had improperly denied the
Permit Holders a portion of the merger consideration. Plaintiffs
sought (i) to enjoin consummation of the merger,
(ii) declaratory relief regarding their past and future
rights as Permit Holders, and (iii) an award of unspecified
damages on claims for breach of fiduciary duty, breach of
contract, unjust enrichment, estoppel and fraud. In addition to
dismissing its claims, the court also denied the
plaintiffs motion for a preliminary injunction. On
February 4, 2008, the Permit Holders appealed the lower
courts ruling dismissing their complaint but did not
pursue an appeal of the lower courts denial of their
request for an order enjoining the merger. The appeal was denied
in its entirety by the appellate court in a decision issued on
June 24, 2008. On October 7, 2008, a motion by the
Permit Holders for leave to appeal to the New York Court of
Appeals was denied by the Appellate Division.
131
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Thereafter, a motion by the Permit Holders for leave to appeal
directly to the New York Court of Appeals was denied on
January 20, 2009 by the Court of Appeals.
The Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims that
arise in the ordinary course of business. However, the Company
does not believe that the resolution of these matters, including
those specifically discussed above, will have a material adverse
effect on the Companys consolidated financial condition,
results of operations, or liquidity. It is possible, however,
that future results of operations for any particular quarterly
or annual period could be materially and adversely affected by
any new developments relating to the legal proceedings and
claims.
|
|
16.
|
Employee
Benefit Plans
|
The Companys U.K.-based subsidiaries have a defined
contribution pension plan for eligible employees. The Company
contributes a percentage of the employees base salary to
the plan each month and employees are also able to make
additional voluntary contributions, subject to plan and
statutory limits. The Companys contribution ranges from
10% to 20% of the employees base salary. Total pension
contributions made by the Company for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 were $1.0 million,
$982,000 and $832,000, respectively.
The Companys ICE Futures U.S. employees are eligible
to participate in ICE Futures U.S.s 401(k) and Profit
Sharing Plan (the NY 401(k) Plan). The Company
offers a match of 50% of the first 4% of the eligible
employees compensation contributed to the NY 401(k) Plan,
subject to plan and statutory limits, and an annual
discretionary contribution. Total matching contributions and
discretionary contributions under the NY 401(k) Plan for the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was
$1.5 million and $1.6 million, respectively. This plan
was frozen to new contributions effective December 31, 2008.
The Companys Creditex employees are eligible to
participate in The Creditex Group Inc. 401(k) Plan. There were
no contributions to this plan during the year ended
December 31, 2008. This plan was frozen to new
contributions effective December 31, 2008.
The remaining employees of the Companys
U.S. operations are eligible to participate in the
Companys 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan (the 401(k)
Plan). The Company offers a match of 100% of the first 5%
of the eligible employees compensation contributed to the
401(k) Plan, subject to plan and statutory limits. Total
matching contributions under the Companys 401(k) Plan for
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 were
$1.4 million, $1.1 million and $860,000, respectively.
No discretionary or profit sharing contributions were made
during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 or 2006.
|
|
17.
|
CBOT
Merger-Related Transaction Costs
|
The Company incurred incremental direct merger-related
transaction costs of $11.1 million during the year ended
December 31, 2007 relating to the proposed merger with CBOT
Holdings, Inc. (CBOT). Ultimately, CBOTs board
of directors did not accept the Companys proposal to merge
with CBOT, and instead accepted an improved proposal from the
Chicago Mercantile Exchange Holdings, Inc. (CME),
which resulted in a completed transaction between CME and CBOT
on July 13, 2007. The $11.1 million in merger-related
transaction costs included investment banking advisors, legal,
accounting, proxy advisor, public relation services and other
external costs directly related to the proposed transaction.
These costs have been recorded as CBOT merger-related
transaction costs in the accompanying consolidated statements of
income for the year ended December 31, 2007.
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Companys
principal business segments consist of its OTC business segment,
its futures business segment and
132
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
its market data business segment. The operations of ICE Futures
Europe, ICE Futures U.S. and ICE Futures Canada make up the
futures business segment and the operations of ICE Data make up
the market data business segment. The remaining companies,
including the acquisitions of Creditex, YellowJacket,
ChemConnect, Chatham and Commoditrack, have been included in the
OTC business segment as they primarily support the
Companys OTC business operations.
Intersegment revenues and transactions attributable to the
performance of services are recorded at cost plus an agreed
market percentage intercompany profit. Intersegment revenues
attributable to licensing transactions have been priced in
accordance with comparable third party agreements. The
accounting policies of the business segments are the same as
those described in the summary of significant accounting
policies. Financial data for the Companys business
segments and geographic areas are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTC
|
|
|
Futures
|
|
|
Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
396,351
|
|
|
$
|
362,194
|
|
|
$
|
54,533
|
|
|
$
|
813,078
|
|
Intersegment revenues
|
|
|
41,199
|
|
|
|
5,746
|
|
|
|
33,432
|
|
|
|
80,377
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
48,651
|
|
|
|
13,472
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
62,247
|
|
Interest and investment income
|
|
|
2,828
|
|
|
|
8,045
|
|
|
|
663
|
|
|
|
11,536
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
13,219
|
|
|
|
6,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,573
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
61,622
|
|
|
|
84,017
|
|
|
|
26,885
|
|
|
|
172,524
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
92,879
|
|
|
|
156,343
|
|
|
|
51,750
|
|
|
|
300,972
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
2,307,685
|
|
|
|
12,633,541
|
|
|
|
18,355
|
|
|
|
14,959,581
|
|
Capital expenditures and software development costs
|
|
|
35,473
|
|
|
|
13,121
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
48,812
|
|
Goodwill and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
2,021,201
|
|
|
|
142,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,163,671
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
176,445
|
|
|
|
110,182
|
|
|
|
88,485
|
|
|
|
375,112
|
|
Geographic
areas:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
European
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Union and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
565,028
|
|
|
$
|
248,050
|
|
|
$
|
813,078
|
|
As of December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
74,488
|
|
|
|
14,464
|
|
|
|
88,952
|
|
Goodwill and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
2,163,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,163,671
|
|
133
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Revenues from three clearing members of the futures business
segment comprised 17.0%, 13.1% and 10.4% of the Companys
futures revenues for the year ended December 31, 2008.
These clearing members are primarily intermediaries and
represent a broad range of principal trading firms. If a
clearing member ceased its operations, the Company believes that
the trading firms would continue to conduct transactions and
would clear those transactions through a different clearing
member. No additional customers accounted for more than 10% of
the Companys segment revenues or consolidated revenues
during the year ended December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTC
|
|
|
Futures
|
|
|
Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
241,803
|
|
|
$
|
289,333
|
|
|
$
|
43,157
|
|
|
$
|
574,293
|
|
Intersegment revenues
|
|
|
32,311
|
|
|
|
3,754
|
|
|
|
19,079
|
|
|
|
55,144
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
26,286
|
|
|
|
6,386
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
32,701
|
|
Interest and investment income
|
|
|
5,589
|
|
|
|
5,747
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
11,865
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
15,658
|
|
|
|
2,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,641
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
33,907
|
|
|
|
64,005
|
|
|
|
19,910
|
|
|
|
117,822
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
79,199
|
|
|
|
126,024
|
|
|
|
35,389
|
|
|
|
240,612
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,654,133
|
|
|
|
1,122,279
|
|
|
|
19,933
|
|
|
|
2,796,345
|
|
Capital expenditures and software development costs
|
|
|
38,044
|
|
|
|
5,051
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
43,266
|
|
Goodwill and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
1,397,696
|
|
|
|
149,713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,547,409
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
115,541
|
|
|
|
120,249
|
|
|
|
51,991
|
|
|
|
287,781
|
|
Geographic
areas:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
European
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Union and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
376,012
|
|
|
$
|
198,281
|
|
|
$
|
574,293
|
|
As of December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
60,874
|
|
|
|
2,650
|
|
|
|
63,524
|
|
Goodwill and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
1,547,409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,547,409
|
|
134
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Revenues from one clearing member of the futures business
segment comprised 11.5% of the Companys futures revenues
for the year ended December 31, 2007. This clearing member
is primarily an intermediary and represents a broad range of
principal trading firms. If a clearing member ceased its
operations, the Company believes that the trading firms would
continue to conduct transactions and would clear those
transactions through a different clearing member. No additional
customers accounted for more than 10% of the Companys
segment revenues or consolidated revenues during the year ended
December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTC
|
|
|
Futures
|
|
|
Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
168,743
|
|
|
$
|
127,024
|
|
|
$
|
18,032
|
|
|
$
|
313,799
|
|
Intersegment revenues
|
|
|
26,704
|
|
|
|
4,404
|
|
|
|
11,123
|
|
|
|
42,231
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
11,671
|
|
|
|
2,031
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
13,714
|
|
Interest and investment income
|
|
|
6,067
|
|
|
|
2,402
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
8,565
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
33,858
|
|
|
|
28,089
|
|
|
|
7,328
|
|
|
|
69,275
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
77,494
|
|
|
|
52,164
|
|
|
|
13,610
|
|
|
|
143,268
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
414,193
|
|
|
|
71,972
|
|
|
|
7,046
|
|
|
|
493,211
|
|
Capital expenditures and software development costs
|
|
|
18,068
|
|
|
|
1,678
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
19,815
|
|
Goodwill and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
81,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,126
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
68,884
|
|
|
|
64,730
|
|
|
|
17,075
|
|
|
|
150,689
|
|
Geographic
areas:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
European
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
Union
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
178,100
|
|
|
$
|
135,699
|
|
|
$
|
313,799
|
|
As of December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
21,820
|
|
|
|
4,460
|
|
|
|
26,280
|
|
Goodwill and other intangibles, net
|
|
|
81,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,126
|
|
Revenues from two clearing members of the futures business
segment comprised 15.4% and 12.1% of the Companys futures
revenues for the year ended December 31, 2006. These
clearing members are primarily intermediaries and represent a
broad range of principal trading firms. If a clearing member
ceased its operations, the Company believes that the trading
firms would continue to conduct transactions and would clear
those transactions through a different clearing member. No
additional customers accounted for more than 10% of the
Companys segment revenues or consolidated revenues during
the year ended December 31, 2006.
135
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
19.
|
Earnings
Per Common Share
|
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and
denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per common share
computations for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007
and 2006 (in thousands, expect per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
300,972
|
|
|
$
|
240,612
|
|
|
$
|
143,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
71,184
|
|
|
|
68,985
|
|
|
|
56,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
4.23
|
|
|
$
|
3.49
|
|
|
$
|
2.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
71,184
|
|
|
|
68,985
|
|
|
|
56,474
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options and restricted stock
|
|
|
980
|
|
|
|
1,995
|
|
|
|
3,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
72,164
|
|
|
|
70,980
|
|
|
|
59,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share
|
|
$
|
4.17
|
|
|
$
|
3.39
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share is calculated using the weighted
average common shares outstanding during the period. Common
equivalent shares from stock options and restricted stock
awards, using the treasury stock method, are also included in
the diluted per share calculations unless their effect of
inclusion would be antidilutive. During the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, 605,000 and 37,000 outstanding
stock options, respectively, were not included in the
computation of diluted earnings per common share, because to do
so would have had an antidilutive effect because the outstanding
stock option exercise prices were greater than the average
market price of the common shares during the relevant periods.
136
IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
20.
|
Quarterly
Financial Data (Unaudited)
|
The following table has been prepared from the financial records
of the Company, and reflects all adjustments that are, in the
opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the
results of operations for the interim periods presented (in
thousands, expect per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st
Qtr(a)
|
|
|
2nd
Qtr(b)
|
|
|
3rd
Qtr
|
|
|
4th
Qtr(c)
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
207,214
|
|
|
$
|
197,160
|
|
|
$
|
201,444
|
|
|
$
|
207,260
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
144,280
|
|
|
|
132,785
|
|
|
|
119,142
|
|
|
|
97,327
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
92,290
|
|
|
|
84,864
|
|
|
|
74,963
|
|
|
|
48,855
|
|
Earnings per common share(d):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.31
|
|
|
$
|
1.20
|
|
|
$
|
1.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.68
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.29
|
|
|
$
|
1.19
|
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.67
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
126,608
|
|
|
$
|
136,654
|
|
|
$
|
151,735
|
|
|
$
|
159,296
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
79,643
|
|
|
|
76,529
|
|
|
|
100,864
|
|
|
|
96,527
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
55,586
|
|
|
|
53,693
|
|
|
|
66,681
|
|
|
|
64,652
|
|
Earnings per common share(d):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
|
$
|
0.78
|
|
|
$
|
0.96
|
|
|
$
|
0.93
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
0.93
|
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The Company recognized a net gain on disposal of an asset of
$9.3 million during the first quarter of 2007 (Note 7). |
|
(b) |
|
The Company recognized $11.1 million in CBOT merger-related
transaction costs during the second quarter of 2007
(Note 17). |
|
(c) |
|
The Company recognized an impairment loss on the NCDEX cost
method investment of $15.7 million during the fourth
quarter of 2008 (Note 6). |
|
(d) |
|
The annual earnings per common share may not equal the sum of
the individual quarters earnings per common share due to
rounding. |
137
|
|
ITEM 9.
|
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
None.
|
|
ITEM 9(A).
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures. As of the end of the period covered
by this report, an evaluation was carried out by our management,
with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon that
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures
were effective as of the end of the period covered by this
report.
(b) Changes in Internal Controls over Financial
Reporting. There were no changes in our internal
controls over financial reporting that occurred during our most
recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls
over financial reporting. As a result, no corrective actions
were taken.
(c) Managements Annual Report on Internal Control
over Financial Reporting and the Attestation Report of the
Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm. Managements report on its assessment
of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2008 and the attestation
report of Ernst & Young LLP on our internal control
over financial reporting are set forth in Part II,
Item 8 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
|
|
ITEM 9(B).
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
Not applicable.
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
Information relating to our Board of Directors set forth under
the captions Proposal 1 Election of
Directors Nominees for Election as Directors at the
2009 Annual Meeting and Proposal 1
Election of Directors Continuing Directors in
our Proxy Statement for our 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
(2009 Proxy Statement) is incorporated herein by
reference. Information relating to our executive officers is,
pursuant to Instruction 3 of Item 401(b) of
Regulation S-K
and General Instruction G(3) of
Form 10-K,
set forth at Part I, Item 4(A) of this Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
under the caption Executive Officers of
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. Information regarding
compliance by our directors and executive officers and owners of
more than ten percent of our Common Stock with the reporting
requirements of Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, set forth under the caption
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance in the 2009
Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference. Information
relating to our financial expert serving on our Audit Committee
(Item 407(d)(5) of
Regulation S-K),
our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
(Item 407(c)(3) of
Regulation S-K),
our Audit Committee (Item 407(d)(4) of
Regulation S-K)
and compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
(Item 405 of
Regulation S-K),
is set forth under the caption Meetings and Committees of
the Board in our 2009 Proxy Statement and is incorporated
herein by reference.
Code of
Ethics
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which
applies to all of our employees, officers and directors. Our
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics meets the requirements of a
code of ethics as defined by Item 406 of
Regulation S-K,
and applies to our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer (who is the principal financial and principal accounting
officer), as well as all other employees, as indicated above.
Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics also meets the
requirements of a code of ethics and business
138
conduct under the New York Stock Exchange listing standards. Our
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on our website
at www.theice.com under the heading About
ICE, Investors & Media, then
Corporate Governance. We will also provide a copy of
the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics to stockholders at no
charge upon written request.
|
|
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
Information relating to executive compensation set forth under
the captions Proposal 1 Election of
Directors Directors Compensation,
Compensation Discussion & Analysis and
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation in our 2009 Proxy Statement is incorporated
herein by reference, except for the information set forth in the
section entitled Compensation Committee Report,
which specifically is not so incorporated by reference.
|
|
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
Information regarding ownership of our common stock by certain
persons as set forth under the caption Security Ownership
of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management in our 2009
Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference. In
addition, information in tabular form relating to securities
authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans is
set forth under the caption Equity Compensation Plan
Information and Benefit Plans and is
incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
Information regarding certain relationships and transactions
between our company and certain of our affiliates as set forth
under the caption Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions in our 2009 Proxy Statement is incorporated
herein by reference. In addition, information regarding our
directors independence (Item 407(a) of
Regulation S-K)
as set forth under the caption Proposal 1
Election of Directors Nominees for Election as
Directors as the 2009 Annual Meeting in our 2009 Proxy
Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Information regarding principal accountant fees and services of
our independent registered public accounting firm,
Ernst & Young LLP, is set forth under the caption
Information About the Companys Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees and Services in our
2009 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
|
|
ITEM 15.
|
EXHIBITS,
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
(a) Documents Filed as Part of this Report.
(1) Financial Statements
Our consolidated financial statements and the related reports of
management and independent registered public accounting firm
which are required to be filed as part of this Report are
included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
These consolidated financial statements are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2008 and
2007.
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity
for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
(2) Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule II Consolidated Valuation and
Qualifying Accounts is included as a schedule herein.
Schedules not listed have been omitted because they are not
applicable or the required information is included in the
consolidated financial statements or notes, thereto.
(3) Exhibits
See (b) below.
(b) Exhibits
The exhibits listed below under Index to Exhibits
are filed with or incorporated by reference in this Report.
Where such filing is made by incorporation by reference to a
previously filed registration statement or report, such
registration statement or report is identified in parentheses.
We will furnish any exhibit upon request to Investor Relations,
2100 RiverEdge Parkway, Suite 500, Atlanta, Georgia 30328.
140
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
INTERCONTINENTALEXCHANGE, INC.
(Registrant)
Date: February 11, 2009
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/
Jeffrey C. Sprecher
|
Jeffrey C. Sprecher
Chief Executive Officer
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature
appears below constitutes and appoints Jeffrey C. Sprecher and
Scott A. Hill, and each of them his or her true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution
and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place
and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all
amendments to this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the calendar year ended December 31, 2008 and to file
the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and
each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each
and every act and thing requisite or necessary to be done, as
fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or their or his
substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done
by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated as
of the date indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jeffrey
C. Sprecher
Jeffrey
C. Sprecher
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
|
|
February 11, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Scott
A. Hill
Scott
A. Hill
|
|
Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial
and accounting officer)
|
|
February 11, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Charles
R. Crisp
Charles
R. Crisp
|
|
Director
|
|
February 11, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Fredrick
W. Hatfield
Fredrick
W. Hatfield
|
|
Director
|
|
February 11, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Jean-Marc
Forneri
Jean-Marc
Forneri
|
|
Director
|
|
February 11, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Terrence
F. Martell
Terrence
F. Martell
|
|
Director
|
|
February 11, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Sir
Robert Reid
Sir
Robert Reid
|
|
Director
|
|
February 11, 2009
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Frederic
V. Salerno
Frederic
V. Salerno
|
|
Director
|
|
February 11, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Fred
W. Schoenhut
Fred
W. Schoenhut
|
|
Director
|
|
February 11, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Judith
A. Sprieser
Judith
A. Sprieser
|
|
Director
|
|
February 11, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Vincent
Tese
Vincent
Tese
|
|
Director
|
|
February 11, 2009
|
142
FINANCIAL
STATEMENT SCHEDULE
INTERCONTINENTALEXCHANGE,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II
CONSOLIDATED VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of
|
|
|
Costs and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
Description
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Expenses(1)
|
|
|
Deductions(2)
|
|
|
End of Year
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
370
|
|
|
$
|
2,019
|
|
|
$
|
(989
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,400
|
|
Deferred income tax valuation allowance
|
|
$
|
2,718
|
|
|
$
|
2,360
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,078
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
985
|
|
|
$
|
199
|
|
|
$
|
(814
|
)
|
|
$
|
370
|
|
Deferred income tax valuation allowance
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,718
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,718
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
261
|
|
|
$
|
1,034
|
|
|
$
|
(310
|
)
|
|
$
|
985
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Additions charged to costs and expenses for the allowance for
doubtful accounts are based on our historical collection
experiences and managements assessment of the
collectibility of specific accounts. Additions to the deferred
income tax valuation allowance relate to state research and
development tax credits and foreign net operating loss
carryforwards which the Company does not expect to realize. This
column also includes the foreign currency translation
adjustments. |
|
(2) |
|
Deductions represent the write-off of uncollectible receivables,
net of recoveries. |
143
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
The following exhibits are filed with this Report. We will
furnish any exhibit upon request to IntercontinentalExchange,
Inc., Investor Relations, 2100 RiverEdge Parkway,
Suite 500, Atlanta, Georgia 30328.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Description of Document
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc., Columbia Merger Corporation,
Creditex Group Inc. and TA Associates, Inc. dated June 3,
2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
ICEs Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q,
filed with the SEC on August 4, 2008, File
No. 001-32671).
|
|
2
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of
August 26, 2008, to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated
as of June 3, 2008, by and among ICE, MergerCo, Creditex
and the Stockholders Representative (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ICEs Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on September 2, 2008, File
No. 001-32671).
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Fourth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to ICEs Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
filed with the SEC on March 10, 2006, File
No. 001-32671).
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to ICEs
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on December 16, 2008, File
No. 001-32671).
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2008,
between IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Jeffrey C. Sprecher
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ICEs
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File
No. 001-32671).
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2008,
between Intercontinental-Exchange, Inc. and Charles A. Vice
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to ICEs
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File
No. 001-32671).
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2008,
between Intercontinental-Exchange, Inc. and David S. Goone
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to ICEs
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File
No. 001-32671).
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2008,
between Intercontinental-Exchange, Inc. and Edwin D. Marcial
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to ICEs
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File
No. 001-32671).
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of December 31, 2008, between
Intercontinental-Exchange, Inc. and Scott A. Hill (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to ICEs Current Report
on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on January 7, 2009, File
No. 001-32671).
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
|
|
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan, as
amended effective December 31, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
|
|
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2003 Restricted Stock Deferral
Plan for Outside Directors, as amended effective
December 31, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
|
|
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2004 Restricted Stock Plan, as
amended effective December 31, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
|
|
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan, as
amended effective December 31, 2008.
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
|
|
$500,000,000 Credit Agreement, dated as of January 12,
2007, among IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. Wachovia Bank,
National Association, as Administrative Agent, Bank of America,
N.A., as Syndication Agent, and other Lenders named therein
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ICEs
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on January 12, 2007, File
No. 001-32671).
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to $500,000,000 Credit Agreement among
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Wachovia Bank, National
Association, as Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A., as
Syndication Agent, and the Lenders named therein dated as of
August 24, 2007 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on August 30, 2007, File
No. 001-32671).
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Description of Document
|
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
|
|
Second Amendment to $500,000,000 Credit Agreement among
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Wachovia Bank, National
Association, as Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A., as
Syndication Agent, and the Lenders named therein dated as of
June 13, 2008 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on June 19, 2008, File
No. 001-32671).
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
|
|
$150,000,000 Credit Agreement, dated as of June 27, 2008,
among IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. Wachovia Bank, National
Association, as Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A., as
Syndication Agent, and other Lenders named therein (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ICEs Current Report
on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on July 3, 2008,
File No. 001-32671).
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
|
|
Office Lease, dated as of June 8, 2000, as amended, between
CMD Realty Investment Fund IV, L.P. and
IntercontinentalExchange, LLC (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.17 to ICEs registration statement on
Form S-1,
filed with the SEC on June 6, 2005, File
No. 333-123500).*
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
|
|
Lease Amendment Six, dated as of October 12, 2005, by and
between CMD Realty Investment Fund IV, L.P. and
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.27 to ICEs registration statement on
Form S-1,
filed with the SEC on October 14, 2005, File
No. 333-123500).*
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
|
|
Lease Amendment Seven, dated as of May 12, 2006, by and
between CMD Realty Investment Fund IV, L.P. and
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to ICEs Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on May 17, 2006, File
No. 001-32671).*
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
|
|
Lease Amendment Eight, dated as of November 28, 2006.*
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
|
|
Lease Amendment Nine, dated as of February 21, 2007.*
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
|
|
Lease Amendment Ten, dated as of May 15, 2008.*
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
|
|
TRS Application Services Agreement, dated as of
April 25, 2001, between The International Petroleum
Exchange of London Limited and LIFFE Services Company Limited
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to ICEs
registration statement on
Form S-1,
filed with the SEC on October 14, 2005, File
No. 333-123500).*
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
|
|
Deed of Novation, dated July 22, 2005, between The
International Petroleum Exchange of London Limited, LIFFE
Services Limited, Atos Euronext Market Solutions Limited, and
LIFFE Administration and Management (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.25 to ICEs registration statement on
Form S-1,
filed with the SEC on October 14, 2005, File
No. 333-123500).
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
|
|
Managed Services Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2007,
between ICE Clear Europe Limited and Atos Euronext Market
Solutions Limited.*
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
|
|
Patent License Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2002,
between eSpeed, Inc. and IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to ICEs
registration statement on
Form S-1,
filed with the SEC on June 6, 2005,
File No. 333-123500).
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
|
|
Settlement Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2005, by and
between EBS Group Limited and IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to ICEs
registration statement on
Form S-1,
filed with the SEC on October 14, 2005, File
No. 333-123500).
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
|
|
License Agreement For Index-Related Derivative Products dated as
of June 15, 2007 between IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and
Frank Russell Company (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to ICEs Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on June 20, 2007,
File No. 001-32671).*
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
|
|
Contribution and Asset Transfer Agreement, dated as of
May 11, 2000, by and between IntercontinentalExchange, LLC,
Continental Power Exchange, Inc., and Jeffrey C. Sprecher
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 to ICEs
registration statement on
Form S-1,
filed with the SEC on October 25, 2005, File
No. 333-123500).
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to Contribution and Asset Transfer Agreement,
dated as of May 17, 2000, by and among
IntercontinentalExchange, LLC, Continental Power Exchange, Inc.,
and Jeffrey C. Sprecher (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.32 to ICEs registration statement on
Form S-1,
filed with the SEC on October 25, 2005, File
No. 333-123500).
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
Description of Document
|
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
|
|
Second Amendment to Contribution and Asset Transfer Agreement,
dated as of October 24, 2005, by and among
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc., Continental Power Exchange,
Inc., and Jeffrey C. Sprecher (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.33 to ICEs registration
statement on
Form S-1,
filed with the SEC on October 25, 2005, File
No. 333-123500).
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
|
|
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. Amended and Restated 1999 Stock
Option/Stock Issuance Plan (formerly the Creditex Group Inc.
Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan)
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to ICEs
registration statement on
Form S-8,
filed with the SEC on September 2, 2008, File
No. 333-153299).
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm.
|
|
24
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Power of Attorney (included with signature page hereto).
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Rule 13a - 14(a)/15d - 14(a) Certification of
Chief Executive Officer.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Rule 13a - 14(a)/15d - 14(a) Certification of
Chief Financial Officer.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Confidential treatment has been previously requested or granted
to portions of this exhibit by the SEC. |
146