FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
June 30,
2009
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to .
|
Commission file
no. 001-13831
Quanta Services, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
74-2851603
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
1360 Post
Oak Blvd.
Suite 2100
Houston, Texas 77056
(Address
of principal executive offices, including zip
code)
(Registrants
telephone number, including area code)
(713) 629-7600
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer þ
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
197,664,132 shares of Common Stock were outstanding as of
July 31, 2009. As of the same date, 662,293 shares of
Limited Vote Common Stock were outstanding.
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
437,901
|
|
|
$
|
524,356
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $8,802 and $9,817
|
|
|
795,251
|
|
|
|
723,711
|
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on
uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
54,379
|
|
|
|
49,007
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
25,813
|
|
|
|
27,967
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
68,147
|
|
|
|
60,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,381,491
|
|
|
|
1,385,892
|
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of
$330,070 and $359,565
|
|
|
635,456
|
|
|
|
677,346
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
33,479
|
|
|
|
42,159
|
|
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of
$57,215 and $67,027
|
|
|
140,717
|
|
|
|
130,905
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,363,100
|
|
|
|
1,363,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,554,243
|
|
|
$
|
3,599,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
$
|
1,155
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
400,253
|
|
|
|
364,514
|
|
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on
uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
50,390
|
|
|
|
66,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
451,798
|
|
|
|
430,722
|
|
Convertible subordinated notes, net of discount of $21,475 and
$19,350
|
|
|
122,275
|
|
|
|
124,400
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
91,104
|
|
|
|
92,001
|
|
Insurance and other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
217,851
|
|
|
|
218,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
883,028
|
|
|
|
866,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.00001 par value, 300,000,000 shares
authorized, 199,317,237 and 200,246,239 shares issued and
196,928,203 and 197,654,372 shares outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Limited Vote Common Stock, $.00001 par value,
3,345,333 shares authorized, 662,293 and
662,293 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
2,803,836
|
|
|
|
2,811,846
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(97,485
|
)
|
|
|
(42,704
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(2,956
|
)
|
|
|
(450
|
)
|
Treasury stock, 2,389,034 and 2,591,867 common shares, at cost
|
|
|
(32,182
|
)
|
|
|
(35,569
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,671,215
|
|
|
|
2,733,125
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
2,671,215
|
|
|
|
2,733,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
3,554,243
|
|
|
$
|
3,599,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
960,882
|
|
|
$
|
813,379
|
|
|
$
|
1,805,324
|
|
|
$
|
1,551,909
|
|
Cost of services (including depreciation)
|
|
|
802,192
|
|
|
|
675,597
|
|
|
|
1,522,757
|
|
|
|
1,296,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
158,690
|
|
|
|
137,782
|
|
|
|
282,567
|
|
|
|
254,913
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
76,292
|
|
|
|
72,970
|
|
|
|
147,008
|
|
|
|
146,573
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
9,876
|
|
|
|
4,906
|
|
|
|
20,466
|
|
|
|
9,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
72,522
|
|
|
|
59,906
|
|
|
|
115,093
|
|
|
|
98,528
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(9,722
|
)
|
|
|
(2,803
|
)
|
|
|
(19,316
|
)
|
|
|
(5,621
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2,088
|
|
|
|
628
|
|
|
|
6,083
|
|
|
|
1,709
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
482
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
65,166
|
|
|
|
57,889
|
|
|
|
102,342
|
|
|
|
94,850
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
27,498
|
|
|
|
24,245
|
|
|
|
43,203
|
|
|
|
39,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
37,668
|
|
|
|
33,644
|
|
|
|
59,139
|
|
|
|
55,134
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stock
|
|
$
|
37,668
|
|
|
$
|
33,427
|
|
|
$
|
59,139
|
|
|
$
|
54,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share attributable to common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average basic shares outstanding
|
|
|
172,393
|
|
|
|
198,300
|
|
|
|
171,681
|
|
|
|
198,365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding
|
|
|
197,021
|
|
|
|
198,379
|
|
|
|
172,112
|
|
|
|
198,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
37,668
|
|
|
$
|
33,644
|
|
|
$
|
59,139
|
|
|
$
|
55,134
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
19,188
|
|
|
|
20,195
|
|
|
|
38,180
|
|
|
|
39,963
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
9,876
|
|
|
|
4,906
|
|
|
|
20,466
|
|
|
|
9,812
|
|
Non-cash interest expense
|
|
|
4,620
|
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
|
|
9,131
|
|
|
|
2,125
|
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
|
|
461
|
|
Amortization of deferred revenues
|
|
|
(2,123
|
)
|
|
|
(4,283
|
)
|
|
|
(4,251
|
)
|
|
|
(6,919
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
(458
|
)
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
(306
|
)
|
|
|
635
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
1,550
|
|
|
|
1,477
|
|
|
|
2,902
|
|
|
|
1,932
|
|
Provision for insurance receivable
|
|
|
3,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(4,180
|
)
|
|
|
(176
|
)
|
|
|
(5,489
|
)
|
|
|
4,582
|
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation
|
|
|
4,583
|
|
|
|
4,964
|
|
|
|
8,359
|
|
|
|
9,666
|
|
Tax impact of stock-based equity awards
|
|
|
(1,073
|
)
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
(2,307
|
)
|
|
|
1,708
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of non-cash
transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Increase) decrease in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable
|
|
|
(61,830
|
)
|
|
|
(47,087
|
)
|
|
|
(94,657
|
)
|
|
|
60,953
|
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on
uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
(951
|
)
|
|
|
11,328
|
|
|
|
(3,506
|
)
|
|
|
5,464
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(5,851
|
)
|
|
|
(2,180
|
)
|
|
|
(4,911
|
)
|
|
|
(2,154
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(1,333
|
)
|
|
|
2,159
|
|
|
|
(422
|
)
|
|
|
2,264
|
|
Increase (decrease) in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses and other non-current
liabilities
|
|
|
23,758
|
|
|
|
25,168
|
|
|
|
22,717
|
|
|
|
(30,094
|
)
|
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on
uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
(9,967
|
)
|
|
|
6,638
|
|
|
|
(17,097
|
)
|
|
|
15,824
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
1,089
|
|
|
|
904
|
|
|
|
(726
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
18,116
|
|
|
|
59,428
|
|
|
|
33,302
|
|
|
|
170,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
6,919
|
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
9,064
|
|
|
|
2,704
|
|
Additions of property and equipment
|
|
|
(59,983
|
)
|
|
|
(43,575
|
)
|
|
|
(113,149
|
)
|
|
|
(84,840
|
)
|
Cash paid for acquisition, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(22,722
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,909
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for developed technology
|
|
|
(14,573
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,573
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(90,359
|
)
|
|
|
(42,697
|
)
|
|
|
(141,567
|
)
|
|
|
(82,136
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from other long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
2,095
|
|
Payments on other long-term debt
|
|
|
(654
|
)
|
|
|
(2,110
|
)
|
|
|
(1,598
|
)
|
|
|
(3,247
|
)
|
Tax impact of stock-based equity awards
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
2,307
|
|
|
|
(1,708
|
)
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
4,236
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
5,648
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
4,655
|
|
|
|
(2,006
|
)
|
|
|
6,992
|
|
|
|
(2,718
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(67,588
|
)
|
|
|
14,725
|
|
|
|
(101,273
|
)
|
|
|
85,776
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
822
|
|
|
|
(1,017
|
)
|
|
|
679
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
372,194
|
|
|
|
508,809
|
|
|
|
407,081
|
|
|
|
437,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
304,791
|
|
|
$
|
524,356
|
|
|
$
|
304,791
|
|
|
$
|
524,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (paid) received during the period for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
(8,951
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,734
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,137
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,894
|
)
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$
|
(31,119
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,223
|
)
|
|
$
|
(35,455
|
)
|
|
$
|
(32,141
|
)
|
Income tax refunds
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
421
|
|
|
$
|
485
|
|
|
$
|
1,369
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
4
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Unaudited)
|
|
1.
|
BUSINESS
AND ORGANIZATION:
|
Quanta Services, Inc. (Quanta) is a leading national provider of
specialized contracting services, offering
end-to-end
network solutions to the electric power, gas, telecommunications
and cable television industries. Effective during the quarter
ended June 30, 2009, Quanta began reporting its results
under three reportable segments: (1) Electric & Gas
Infrastructure Services, (2) Telecom & Ancillary
Infrastructure Services and (3) Dark Fiber. Prior to the
quarter ended June 30, 2009, we reported our results under
two business segments, with all of our operating segments, other
than Dark Fiber, having been aggregated into the Infrastructure
Services segment.
Electric
& Gas Infrastructure Services Segment
The Electric & Gas Infrastructure Services segment
predominantly provides comprehensive network solutions to
customers in the electric power and gas industries, including
designing, installing, repairing and maintaining network
infrastructure. In addition and to a lesser extent, the segment
provides services to customers in the telecommunications and
cable television industries, as well as various ancillary
services which are similar to the services provided by the
Telecom & Ancillary Infrastructure Services segment.
Telecom &
Ancillary Infrastructure Services Segment
The Telecom & Ancillary Infrastructure Services segment
predominantly provides comprehensive network solutions to
customers in the telecommunications and cable television
industries, including designing, installing, repairing and
maintaining network infrastructure, as well as various ancillary
services, such as inside electrical wiring, intelligent traffic
networks, cable and control systems for light rail lines,
airports and highways, and specialty rock trenching, directional
boring and road milling for industrial and commercial customers.
In addition and to a lesser extent, the segment provides
services to customers in the electric power and gas industries
which are similar to the services provided by the Electric
& Gas Infrastructure Services segment.
Dark
Fiber Segment
The Dark Fiber segment designs, procures, constructs and
maintains fiber-optic telecommunications infrastructure in
select markets and licenses the right to use these
point-to-point fiber-optic telecommunications facilities to its
customers. The Dark Fiber segment services educational and
healthcare institutions, large industrial and financial services
customers and other entities with high bandwidth
telecommunication needs. The telecommunication services provided
through this business are generally subject to regulation by the
Federal Communications Commission and certain state public
utility commissions.
Acquisitions
During 2008, Quanta made three acquisitions of businesses, which
have been reflected in Quantas consolidated financial
statements as of their respective acquisition dates. These
acquisitions further expanded Quantas capabilities and
scope of services in various locations around the United States.
Quanta has not made any acquisitions during the first half of
2009.
Changes
in Accounting Principles
The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31,
2008 and condensed consolidated statements of operations and
cash flows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008
have been retrospectively restated as discussed in Note 3
to reflect the impact of the January 1, 2009 adoption of
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Staff Position (FSP)
APB 14-1,
Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be
Settled in Cash
5
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement) and
FSP Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
03-6-1,
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based
Payment Transactions are Participating Securities.
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
|
Interim
Condensed Consolidated Financial Information
These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have
been prepared pursuant to the rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC). Certain information and footnote
disclosures, normally included in annual financial statements
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States, have been condensed or
omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations. Quanta believes
that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information
presented not misleading. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments,
necessary to fairly state the financial position, results of
operations and cash flows with respect to the interim
consolidated financial statements have been included. The
results of operations for the interim periods are not
necessarily indicative of the results for the entire fiscal
year. The results of Quanta have historically been subject to
significant seasonal fluctuations.
Quanta recommends that these unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements be read in conjunction with the audited
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of Quanta
and its subsidiaries included in Quantas Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, which was filed with
the SEC on March 2, 2009.
Use of
Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires the use of estimates and assumptions by management in
determining the reported amounts of assets and liabilities,
disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities known to exist
as of the date the financial statements are published and the
reported amount of revenues and expenses recognized during the
periods presented. Quanta reviews all significant estimates
affecting its consolidated financial statements on a recurring
basis and records the effect of any necessary adjustments prior
to their publication. Judgments and estimates are based on
Quantas beliefs and assumptions derived from information
available at the time such judgments and estimates are made.
Uncertainties with respect to such estimates and assumptions are
inherent in the preparation of financial statements. Estimates
are primarily used in Quantas assessment of the allowance
for doubtful accounts, valuation of inventory, useful lives of
assets, fair value assumptions in analyzing goodwill, other
intangibles and long-lived asset impairments, purchase price
allocations, liabilities for self-insured claims, convertible
debt, revenue recognition for construction contracts and dark
fiber licensing, share-based compensation, provision for income
taxes and calculation of uncertain tax positions.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made in prior years
financial statements to conform to classifications used in the
current year.
Cash and
Cash Equivalents
Quanta had cash and cash equivalents of $437.9 million and
$524.4 million as of December 31, 2008 and
June 30, 2009. Cash consisting of interest-bearing demand
deposits is carried at cost, which approximates fair value.
Quanta considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an
original maturity of three months or less to be cash
equivalents, which are carried at fair value. At
December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009, cash equivalents
were $399.1 million and $476.2 million, which
consisted primarily of money market mutual funds and investment
grade commercial paper and are discussed further in Fair
Value Measurements below. As of December 31, 2008 and
6
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
June 30, 2009, cash held in domestic bank accounts was
approximately $433.7 million and $518.2 million and
cash held in foreign bank accounts was approximately
$4.2 million and $6.2 million.
Current
and Long-term Accounts and Notes Receivable and Allowance for
Doubtful Accounts
Quanta provides an allowance for doubtful accounts when
collection of an account or note receivable is considered
doubtful, and receivables are written off against the allowance
when deemed uncollectible. Inherent in the assessment of the
allowance for doubtful accounts are certain judgments and
estimates including, among others, the customers access to
capital, the customers willingness or ability to pay,
general economic and market conditions and the ongoing
relationship with the customer. Under certain circumstances such
as foreclosures or negotiated settlements, Quanta may take title
to the underlying assets in lieu of cash in settlement of
receivables. Material changes in Quantas customers
business or cash flows, which may be further impacted by the
current financial crisis and volatility of the markets, could
affect its ability to collect amounts due from them. As of
December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009, Quanta had total
allowances for doubtful accounts of approximately
$8.8 million and $9.8 million. Should customers
experience financial difficulties or file for bankruptcy, or
should anticipated recoveries relating to receivables in
existing bankruptcies or other workout situations fail to
materialize, Quanta could experience reduced cash flows and
losses in excess of current allowances provided.
The balances billed but not paid by customers pursuant to
retainage provisions in certain contracts will be due upon
completion of the contracts and acceptance by the customer.
Based on Quantas experience with similar contracts in
recent years, the majority of the retention balances at each
balance sheet date will be collected within the subsequent
fiscal year. Current retainage balances as of December 31,
2008 and June 30, 2009 were approximately
$101.1 million and $95.4 million and are included in
accounts receivable. Retainage balances with settlement dates
beyond the next twelve months are included in other assets, net,
and as of December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009 were
$6.0 million and $12.2 million.
Within accounts receivable, Quanta recognizes unbilled
receivables in circumstances such as when: revenues have been
earned and recorded but the amount cannot be billed under the
terms of the contract until a later date; costs have been
incurred but are yet to be billed under cost-reimbursement type
contracts; or amounts arise from routine lags in billing (for
example, work completed one month but not billed until the next
month). These balances do not include revenues accrued for work
performed under fixed-price contracts as these amounts are
recorded as costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings
on uncompleted contracts. At December 31, 2008 and
June 30, 2009, the balances of unbilled receivables
included in accounts receivable were approximately
$122.9 million and $113.9 million.
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
Quanta has recorded goodwill in connection with various of its
acquisitions. Goodwill is subject to an annual assessment for
impairment using a two-step fair value-based test, which Quanta
performs at the reporting unit level. Quanta has determined
that, based on its cash flow structure and its organizational
structure, its individual operating units represent its
reporting units for the purpose of assessing goodwill
impairments. This assessment is performed annually at year-end,
or more frequently if events or circumstances exist which
indicate that goodwill may be impaired. For instance, a decrease
in Quantas market capitalization below book value, a
significant change in business climate or a loss of a
significant customer, among other things, may trigger the need
for interim impairment testing of goodwill associated with one
or all of its reporting units. The change in Quantas
reportable segments during the quarter ended June 30, 2009
did not have any impact on its operating unit structure or the
methods to be used in assessing goodwill for impairment in the
future. The first step of the two-step fair value-based test
involves comparing the fair value of each of Quantas
reporting units with its carrying value, including goodwill. If
the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value,
the second step is performed. The second step compares the
carrying amount of the reporting units goodwill to the
implied fair value of the goodwill. If the implied fair value of
goodwill is less than
7
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the carrying amount, an impairment loss would be recorded as a
reduction to goodwill with a corresponding charge to operating
expense.
Quanta determines the fair value of its reporting units using a
weighted combination of the discounted cash flow, market
multiple and market capitalization valuation approaches, with
heavier weighting on the discounted cash flow method, as in
managements opinion, this method currently results in the
most accurate calculation of a reporting units fair value.
Determining the fair value of a reporting unit requires judgment
and the use of significant estimates and assumptions. Such
estimates and assumptions include revenue growth rates,
operating margins, discount rates, weighted average costs of
capital and future market conditions, among others. Quanta
believes that the estimates and assumptions used in its
impairment assessments are reasonable and based on available
market information, but variations in any of the assumptions
could result in materially different calculations of fair value
and determinations of whether or not an impairment is indicated.
Under the discounted cash flow method, Quanta determines fair
value based on the estimated future cash flows of each reporting
unit, discounted to present value using risk-adjusted industry
discount rates, which reflects the overall level of inherent
risk of a reporting unit and the rate of return an outside
investor would expect to earn. Year one cash flows are derived
from budgeted amounts and operating forecasts, both of which are
evaluated by management. Subsequent period cash flows are
developed for each reporting unit using growth rates that
management believes are reasonably likely to occur along with a
terminal value derived from the reporting units earnings
before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA).
The EBITDA multiples for each reporting unit are based on
trailing
twelve-month
comparable industry data.
Under the market multiple and market capitalization approaches,
Quanta determines the estimated fair value of each of its
reporting units by applying multiples to each reporting
units projected EBITDA and then averaging that estimate
with similar historical calculations using either a one year or
a two year average. For the market capitalization approach,
Quanta adds a reasonable control premium, which is estimated as
the premium that would be received in a sale of the reporting
unit in an orderly transaction between market participants.
The projected cash flows and estimated levels of EBITDA by
reporting unit were used to determine fair value under the three
approaches discussed herein. The following table presents the
significant estimates used by management in determining the fair
values of Quantas reporting units at December 31,
2007 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric & Gas
|
|
Telecom & Ancillary
|
|
Dark Fiber
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
Segment
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
Years of cash flows before terminal value
|
|
5
|
|
5
|
|
5
|
|
5
|
|
N/A
|
|
15
|
Discount rates
|
|
14%
|
|
14% to 15%
|
|
15% to 17%
|
|
15% to 17%
|
|
N/A
|
|
15%
|
EBITDA multiples
|
|
7.0 to 9.0
|
|
6.0 to 8.0
|
|
6.0 to 8.0
|
|
5.0 to 6.0
|
|
N/A
|
|
10.0
|
Weighting of three approaches:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discounted cash flows
|
|
60%
|
|
70%
|
|
60%
|
|
70%
|
|
N/A
|
|
90%
|
Market multiple
|
|
20%
|
|
15%
|
|
20%
|
|
15%
|
|
N/A
|
|
5%
|
Market capitalization
|
|
20%
|
|
15%
|
|
20%
|
|
15%
|
|
N/A
|
|
5%
|
At December 31, 2007, Quanta did not perform a separate
goodwill impairment analysis for the reporting unit that
comprises the Dark Fiber segment as Quanta had recently acquired
this reporting unit on August 30, 2007 in connection with
its acquisition of InfraSource Services, Inc., and goodwill
associated with that transaction was assessed in the aggregate.
The 15-year
discounted cash flow model used for the Dark Fiber segment in
2008 was based on the long-term nature of the underlying fiber
network licensing agreements.
8
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Quanta assigned a higher weighting to the discounted cash flow
approach at both December 31, 2007 and 2008 to reflect
increased expectations of market value being determined from a
held and used model. At December 31, 2008,
Quanta increased the weighting for the discounted cash flow
approach as compared to December 31, 2007 due to the
volatility of the capital markets at the end of 2008 and the
impact such volatility may have had on the accuracy of the
market multiple and market capitalization approaches. Also at
December 31, 2008, Quanta increased discount rates and
decreased EBITDA multiples at reporting units to reflect
potential declines in market conditions.
Quantas intangible assets include customer relationships,
backlog, non-compete agreements and patented rights and
developed technology. The value of customer relationships is
estimated using the
value-in-use
concept utilizing the income approach, specifically the excess
earnings method. The excess earnings analysis consists of
discounting to present value the projected cash flows
attributable to the customer relationships, with consideration
given to customer contract renewals, the importance or lack
thereof of existing customer relationships to Quantas
business plan, income taxes and required rates of return. Quanta
values backlog based upon the contractual nature of the backlog
within each service line, using the income approach to discount
back to present value the cash flows attributable to the backlog.
Quanta amortizes intangible assets based upon the estimated
consumption of the economic benefits of each intangible asset or
on a straight-line basis if the pattern of economic benefits
consumption cannot be reliably estimated. Intangible assets
subject to amortization are reviewed for impairment and are
tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be
recoverable. An impairment loss must be recognized if the
carrying amount of an intangible asset is not recoverable and
its carrying amount exceeds its fair value.
Investments
in Joint Ventures
During the first quarter of 2009, one of Quantas
subsidiaries entered into a joint venture arrangement that was
formed for the purpose of providing infrastructure services
under a contract with a large utility customer. The scope of
services to be provided include the design, installation and
maintenance of electric transmission and distribution systems in
the northeast United States. The joint venture members each own
an equal (50%) equity interest in the joint venture entity and
participate equally in the losses of the entity. Generally,
Quantas share of the profits in the joint venture will be
75%, 67% and 50% during the first year, second year and
thereafter, respectively. Certain incentive profits will be
shared equally between the joint venture members throughout the
term of the joint venture.
Quanta has evaluated its investment in this joint venture in
accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 46(R),
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities an
interpretation of ARB No. 51, (FIN 46(R)) and
determined that the joint venture is a variable interest entity,
with Quanta providing more than half of the subordinated
financial support to the entity through its expected provision
of the majority of the subcontractor services to be provided to
the joint venture. As a result, Quanta has been determined to be
the primary beneficiary of the joint venture and has accounted
for the results of the joint venture on a consolidated basis. In
accordance with FIN 46(R) and SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements, the other 50% equity interest in the joint
venture has been accounted for as a noncontrolling interest as
of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009.
Also during the first quarter of 2009, one of Quantas
subsidiaries began operating under the terms of an
unincorporated joint venture which was entered into for the
purpose of providing joint engineering and construction services
for the design and installation of fuel storage facilities under
a contract for a specific customer. The joint venture is a
general partnership, and the joint venture partners each own an
equal equity interest in the joint venture and participate
equally in the profits and losses of the entity. Quanta has
evaluated this investment in accordance with the FASBs
EITF Issue
No. 00-1,
Investor Balance Sheet and Income Statement Display under
the Equity Method for Investments in Certain Partnerships and
Other Ventures, which provides standards of accounting for
investments in joint ventures that are unique to the
construction industry and that do not qualify as variable
interest
9
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
entities. As a result of this evaluation, Quanta has determined
that its investment in this joint venture partnership represents
an undivided 50% interest in the assets, liabilities, revenues
and profits of the joint venture, and such amounts have been
presented in the accompanying financial statements.
Revenue
Recognition
Infrastructure services Through its Electric &
Gas Infrastructure Services and Telecom & Ancillary
Infrastructure Services segments, Quanta designs, installs and
maintains networks for customers in the electric power, gas,
telecommunications and cable television industries, as well as
provides various ancillary services to commercial, industrial
and governmental entities. These services may be provided
pursuant to master service agreements, repair and maintenance
contracts and fixed price and non-fixed price installation
contracts. Pricing under these contracts may be competitive unit
price, cost-plus/hourly (or time and materials basis) or fixed
price (or lump sum basis), and the final terms and prices of
these contracts are frequently negotiated with the customer.
Under unit-based contracts, the utilization of an output-based
measurement is appropriate for revenue recognition. Under these
contracts, Quanta recognizes revenue as units are completed
based on pricing established between Quanta and the customer for
each unit of delivery, which best reflects the pattern in which
the obligation to the customer is fulfilled. Under
cost-plus/hourly and time and materials type contracts, Quanta
recognizes revenue on an input-basis, as labor hours are
incurred and services are performed.
Revenues from fixed price contracts are recognized using the
percentage-of-completion
method, measured by the percentage of costs incurred to date to
total estimated costs for each contract. These contracts provide
for a fixed amount of revenues for the entire project. Such
contracts provide that the customer accept completion of
progress to date and compensate us for services rendered,
measured in terms of units installed, hours expended or some
other measure of progress. Contract costs include all direct
material, labor and subcontract costs and those indirect costs
related to contract performance, such as indirect labor,
supplies, tools, repairs and depreciation costs. Much of the
materials associated with Quantas work are owner-furnished
and are therefore not included in contract revenues and costs.
The cost estimation process is based on the professional
knowledge and experience of Quantas engineers, project
managers and financial professionals. Changes in job
performance, job conditions and final contract settlements are
factors that influence managements assessment of the total
estimated costs to complete those contracts and therefore,
Quantas profit recognition. Changes in these factors may
result in revisions to costs and income, and their effects are
recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined.
Provisions for losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the
period in which such losses are determined to be probable and
the amount can be reasonably estimated.
Quanta may incur costs subject to change orders, whether
approved or unapproved by the customer,
and/or
claims related to certain contracts. Quanta determines the
probability that such costs will be recovered based upon
evidence such as past practices with the customer, specific
discussions or preliminary negotiations with the customer or
verbal approvals. Quanta treats items as a cost of contract
performance in the period incurred if it is not probable that
the costs will be recovered or will recognize revenue if it is
probable that the contract price will be adjusted and can be
reliably estimated. As of June 30, 2009, Quanta had
approximately $16.6 million of change orders
and/or
claims that had been included as contract price adjustments on
certain contracts which were in the process of being negotiated
in the normal course of business.
The current asset Costs and estimated earnings in excess
of billings on uncompleted contracts represents revenues
recognized in excess of amounts billed for fixed price
contracts. The current liability Billings in excess of
costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts
represents billings in excess of revenues recognized for fixed
price contracts.
Dark fiber The Dark Fiber segment constructs and
licenses the right to use fiber-optic telecommunications
facilities to its customers pursuant to licensing agreements,
typically with terms from five to twenty-five years, inclusive
of certain renewal options. Under those agreements, customers
are provided the right to use a portion of the capacity of a
fiber-optic facility, with the facility owned and maintained by
Quanta. Revenues, including any
10
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
initial fees or advance billings, are recognized ratably over
the expected length of the agreements, including probable
renewal periods. As of December 31, 2008 and June 30,
2009, initial fees and advance billings on these licensing
agreements not yet recorded in revenue were $34.6 million
and $36.0 million and are recognized as deferred revenue,
with $25.1 million and $23.4 million considered to be
long-term and included in other non-current liabilities. Minimum
future licensing revenues expected to be recognized by Quanta
pursuant to these agreements at June 30, 2009 are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
|
Future
|
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of 2009
|
|
$
|
32,297
|
|
2010
|
|
|
55,339
|
|
2011
|
|
|
43,237
|
|
2012
|
|
|
32,682
|
|
2013
|
|
|
22,381
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
65,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed non-cancelable minimum licensing revenues
|
|
$
|
250,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
Taxes
Quanta follows the liability method of accounting for income
taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities
are recorded for future tax consequences of temporary
differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of
assets and liabilities, and are measured using the enacted tax
rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the
underlying assets or liabilities are recovered or settled.
Quanta regularly evaluates valuation allowances established for
deferred tax assets for which future realization is uncertain.
The estimation of required valuation allowances includes
estimates of future taxable income. The ultimate realization of
deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future
taxable income during the periods in which those temporary
differences become deductible. Quanta considers projected future
taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this
assessment. If actual future taxable income differs from these
estimates, Quanta may not realize deferred tax assets to the
extent estimated.
Quanta accounts for uncertain tax positions in accordance with
FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes An Interpretation of
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes
(FIN 48). FIN 48 prescribes a comprehensive model for
how companies should recognize, measure, present and disclose in
their financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or to
be taken on a tax return. Quanta records reserves for expected
tax consequences of uncertain positions assuming that the taxing
authorities have full knowledge of the position and all relevant
facts. As of June 30, 2009, the total amount of
unrecognized tax benefits relating mainly to uncertain tax
positions was $65.0 million, an increase from
December 31, 2008 of $5.8 million primarily related to
tax positions expected to be taken for 2009. For the three
months ended June 30, 2008 and 2009, Quanta recognized
$1.5 million and $1.4 million of interest and
penalties in the provision for income taxes. For each of the six
months ended June 30, 2008 and 2009, Quanta recognized
$2.8 million of interest and penalties in the provision for
income taxes. Quanta believes that it is reasonably possible
that within the next 12 months unrecognized tax benefits
may decrease up to $25.0 million due to the expiration of
certain statutes of limitations.
The income tax laws and regulations are voluminous and are often
ambiguous. As such, Quanta is required to make many subjective
assumptions and judgments regarding its tax positions that could
materially affect amounts recognized in its future consolidated
balance sheets and statements of operations.
11
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Fair
Value Measurements
The carrying values of cash equivalents, accounts receivable,
accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value due
to the short-term nature of those instruments. Categorization
for disclosure purposes is required for qualifying assets and
liabilities into three broad levels based on the priority of the
inputs used to determine the fair values. The fair value
hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices
(unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to
unobservable inputs (Level 3). All of Quantas cash
equivalents that require categorization are categorized as
Level 1 assets at December 31, 2008 and June 30,
2009, as all fair values are based on unadjusted quoted prices
for identical assets in an active market that Quanta has the
ability to access.
Quantas convertible subordinated notes are not required to
be carried at fair value, although their fair market value must
be disclosed. The fair market value of Quantas convertible
subordinated notes is subject to interest rate risk because of
their fixed interest rate and market risk due to the convertible
feature of the convertible subordinated notes. Generally, the
fair market value of fixed interest rate debt will increase as
interest rates fall and decrease as interest rates rise. The
fair market value of Quantas convertible subordinated
notes will also increase as the market price of its stock rises
and will decrease as the market price of its stock falls. The
interest and market value changes affect the fair market value
of Quantas convertible subordinated notes but do not
impact their carrying value. The fair market value of
Quantas convertible subordinated notes is determined based
upon the quoted secondary market price on or before the dates
specified, which is considered a Level 2 input. The fair
value of the aggregate principal amount of Quantas
fixed-rate debt of $143.8 million was $136.6 million
and $160.3 million at December 31, 2008 and
June 30, 2009.
Quanta uses fair value measurements on a non-recurring basis in
its assessment of assets classified as goodwill, other
intangible assets and long-lived assets held and used. In
accordance with its annual impairment test during the quarter
ended December 31, 2008, the carrying amount of goodwill
was compared to its fair value. No changes in carrying amount
resulted. The level of inputs used for fair value measurements
for goodwill, other intangibles assets and long-lived assets
held and used are the lowest level (Level 3) inputs
for which Quanta uses the assistance of third party specialists
to develop valuation assumptions.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Quanta recognizes compensation expense for all stock-based
compensation based on the fair value of the awards granted, net
of estimated forfeitures, at the date of grant. Quanta
calculates the fair value of stock options using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model. The fair value of restricted
stock awards is determined based on the number of shares granted
and the closing price of Quantas common stock on the date
of grant. Forfeitures are estimated based upon historical
activity. The resulting compensation expense from discretionary
awards is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite
service period, which is generally the vesting period, while
compensation expense from performance based awards is recognized
using the graded vesting method over the requisite service
period. The cash flows resulting from the tax deductions in
excess of the compensation expense recognized for options and
restricted stock (excess tax benefit) are classified as
financing cash flows.
|
|
3.
|
CHANGES
IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES AND NEW ACCOUNTING
PRONOUNCEMENTS:
|
New
Accounting Pronouncements
Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements. On
January 1, 2009, Quanta adopted FSP APB
14-1, which
requires issuers of such instruments to separately account for
the liability and equity components of qualifying convertible
debt instruments in a manner that adjusts the recorded value of
the convertible debt to reflect the entitys
non-convertible debt borrowing rate and interest cost at the
time of issuance. The value of the debt instrument is adjusted
through a discount to the face value of the debt, which is
amortized as non-cash interest expense over the expected life of
the debt, with an offsetting adjustment to equity to separately
recognize the value of the debt
12
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
instruments conversion feature. This FSP has been applied
retrospectively to all periods presented. Accordingly, Quanta
recorded a cumulative effect of the change in accounting
principle to accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2007 of
approximately $29.6 million. Also included in accumulated
deficit is the impact from non-cash interest expense recorded in
the amounts of approximately $18.3 million
($11.8 million after tax effect) and $14.9 million
($9.6 million after tax effect) for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2008. In addition, Quanta recorded
non-cash interest expense during the first and second quarters
of 2009 and will continue doing so until Quantas 3.75%
convertible subordinated notes are redeemable at the
holders option in April 2013. Approximately
$4.3 million ($2.8 million after tax effect) non-cash
interest expense will be recorded in 2009, with approximately
$1.1 million ($0.7 million after tax effect) recorded
in each the first and second quarters of 2009. See the tables
below for the impact of the adoption of FSP APB
14-1 as of
December 31, 2008 and for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008.
Also on January 1, 2009, Quanta adopted FSP
EITF 03-6-1.
FSP
EITF 03-6-1 states
that unvested share-based payment awards that contain
non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents
(whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and should
be included in the computation of both basic and diluted
earnings per share. All prior period earnings per share data
presented have been adjusted retrospectively to conform to the
provisions of FSP
EITF 03-6-1.
All of Quantas restricted stock grants have
non-forfeitable rights to dividends and are considered
participating securities under FSP
EITF 03-6-1.
Prior to the retrospective application of FSP
EITF 03-6-1
on January 1, 2009, unvested restricted stock grants were
included in the calculation of weighted average dilutive shares
outstanding using the treasury stock method. Under this previous
method, unvested restricted common shares were not included in
the calculation of weighted average basic shares outstanding and
were included in the calculation of weighted average diluted
shares outstanding to the extent the grant price was less than
the average share price for the respective period. The impact of
the retrospective application of FSP
EITF 03-6-1
on earnings per share for prior periods is immaterial.
Additionally, the adoption of FSP
EITF 03-6-1
had no material impact on basic and diluted income per share in
the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. See the
Statement of Operations table below for the impact of adopting
FSP
EITF 03-6-1
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008.
The following financial statement line items were affected as of
December 31, 2008 and for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008 as a result of the retrospective adoption of
FSP APB 14-1
and FSP
EITF 03-6-1
on January 1, 2009 (in thousands, except per share data):
Consolidated
Balance Sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally
|
|
|
Effect of FSP
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
APB 14-1
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
$
|
34,023
|
|
|
$
|
(544
|
)
|
|
$
|
33,479
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
3,554,787
|
|
|
|
(544
|
)
|
|
|
3,554,243
|
|
Convertible subordinated notes
|
|
|
143,750
|
|
|
|
(21,475
|
)
|
|
|
122,275
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
83,422
|
|
|
|
7,682
|
|
|
|
91,104
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
896,821
|
|
|
|
(13,793
|
)
|
|
|
883,028
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
2,740,552
|
|
|
|
63,284
|
|
|
|
2,803,836
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(47,450
|
)
|
|
|
(50,035
|
)
|
|
|
(97,485
|
)
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,657,966
|
|
|
|
13,249
|
|
|
|
2,671,215
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
3,554,787
|
|
|
$
|
(544
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,554,243
|
|
13
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Consolidated
Statement of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally
|
|
|
Effect of FSP
|
|
|
Effect of
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
APB 14-1
|
|
|
EITF 03-6-1
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
(5,219
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,503
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(9,722
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
29,151
|
|
|
|
(1,653
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,498
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
40,518
|
|
|
|
(2,850
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,668
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average basic shares outstanding
|
|
|
171,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,330
|
|
|
|
172,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding
|
|
|
202,535
|
|
|
|
(6,414
|
)
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
197,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally
|
|
|
Effect of FSP
|
|
|
Effect of
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
APB 14-1
|
|
|
EITF 03-6-1
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
(10,419
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,897
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(19,316
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
46,469
|
|
|
|
(3,266
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,203
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
64,770
|
|
|
|
(5,631
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,139
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average basic shares outstanding
|
|
|
170,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
|
|
171,681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding
|
|
|
201,940
|
|
|
|
(30,650
|
)
|
|
|
822
|
|
|
|
172,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally
|
|
|
Effect of FSP
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
APB 14-1
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
40,518
|
|
|
$
|
(2,850
|
)
|
|
$
|
37,668
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,620
|
|
|
|
4,620
|
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
538
|
|
Deferred income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(2,527
|
)
|
|
|
(1,653
|
)
|
|
|
(4,180
|
)
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
18,116
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally
|
|
|
Effect of FSP
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
APB 14-1
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
64,770
|
|
|
$
|
(5,631
|
)
|
|
$
|
59,139
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,131
|
|
|
|
9,131
|
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
1,309
|
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
Deferred income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(2,223
|
)
|
|
|
(3,266
|
)
|
|
|
(5,489
|
)
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
33,302
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
33,302
|
|
14
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 141(R)-1,
Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in
a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies. FSP
FAS 141(R)-1 amends the provisions related to the initial
recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and
disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies
in a business combination under SFAS No. 141(R) and
has the same effective date as SFAS No. 141(R).
Accordingly, Quanta adopted FSP FAS 141(R)-1 effective
January 1, 2009. FSP FAS 141(R)-1 carries forward the
requirements in SFAS No. 141, Business
Combinations for acquired contingencies, which requires
that such contingencies be recognized at fair value on the
acquisition date if fair value can be reasonably estimated
during the measurement period. Otherwise, companies should
typically account for the acquired contingencies in accordance
with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies. FSP FAS 141(R)-1 also amends the
disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 141(R) to require
separate disclosure of recognized and unrecognized contingencies
if certain conditions are met. As Quanta did not complete any
acquisitions in the first six months of 2009, FSP
FAS 141(R)-1 had no impact on its consolidated financial
position, results of operations, cash flows or disclosures in
the first six months of 2009, but Quanta expects that it may
have a material impact on its consolidated financial position,
results of operations, cash flows or disclosures as a result of
acquisitions in future periods.
On January 1, 2009, Quanta fully adopted
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements.
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes methods
used to measure fair value and expands disclosure requirements
about fair value measurements with respect to financial and
non-financial assets and liabilities. The adoption of
SFAS No. 157 did not have a material impact on
Quantas consolidated financial position, results of
operations, cash flows or disclosures. In April 2009, the FASB
issued FSP
FAS 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of
Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased
and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly. FSP
FAS 157-4
provides additional guidance for estimating fair value when an
entity determines that either the volume
and/or level
of activity for an asset or liability has significantly
decreased. This FSP also provides guidance to identify
circumstances that indicate when a transaction is not orderly.
FSP
FAS 157-4
is effective for interim and annual periods ending after
June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted in certain
circumstances for periods ending after March 15, 2009.
Quanta adopted FSP
FAS 157-4
in the quarter ended March 31, 2009. The adoption of FSP
FAS 157-4
did not have any material impact on Quantas consolidated
financial position, results of operations, cash flows or
disclosures.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, Quanta adopted FSP
FAS 107-1
and APB
28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments. FSP
FAS 107-1
requires public entities to provide the disclosures required by
SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments on a quarterly basis and is
effective for interim and annual periods ending after
June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted in certain
circumstances for periods ending after March 15, 2009.
Because Quanta has been providing these disclosures in its
quarterly reports prior to the issuance of FSP
FAS 107-1,
the adoption of FSP
FAS 107-1
did not have any impact on Quantas consolidated financial
position, results of operations, cash flows or disclosures.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, Quanta adopted FSP
FAS 115-2
and
FAS 124-2,
Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments. FSP
FAS 115-2
establishes a new method of recognizing and reporting
other-than-temporary
impairments of debt securities. The FSP also contains additional
disclosure requirements related to debt and equity securities.
FSP
FAS 115-2
is effective for interim and annual periods ending after
June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted in certain
circumstances for periods ending after March 15, 2009.
Because Quanta has not held any debt or equity securities that
would be within the scope of FSP
FAS 115-2
since its adoption, the adoption of FSP
FAS 115-2
did not have any impact on Quantas consolidated financial
position, results of operations, cash flows or disclosures.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, Quanta adopted
SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events. Although
SFAS No. 165 should not result in significant changes
in the subsequent events an entity reports, it requires enhanced
disclosures related to subsequent events occurring through the
date which an entity has evaluated subsequent events.
SFAS No. 165 is effective for interim and annual
financial statements ending after June 15, 2009
15
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
and must be applied prospectively. In accordance with
SFAS No. 165, Quanta has evaluated subsequent events
through the date of issuance of these condensed consolidated
financial statements, which is August 10, 2009. The
adoption of SFAS No. 165 had no material impact on
Quantas condensed consolidated financial position, results
of operations, cash flows or disclosures in the quarter ended
June 30, 2009, but it may have a material impact on its
disclosures in the future if subsequent events occur that
require disclosure.
On July 1, 2009, Quanta adopted SFAS No. 168,
The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles a replacement of FASB Statement
No. 162. SFAS No. 168 establishes the FASB
Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) as the source
of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to
be used by non-governmental entities in the preparation of
financial statements presented in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP).
Rules and interpretations of the SEC under the authority of
federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP
for SEC registrants such as Quanta. On July 1, 2009, the
Codification reorganized the pre-Codification GAAP into
approximately 90 accounting topics and superseded all
then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All
accounting literature not included in the Codification became
non-authoritative. All of the Codifications content
carries the same level of authority, which effectively
superseded SFAS No. 162. SFAS No. 168 is
effective for financial statements for interim or annual periods
ending after September 15, 2009. Accordingly, it is
effective for Quanta for the quarter ended September 30,
2009, and Quanta has therefore adopted SFAS No. 168 on
the first day of the third quarter of 2009. The adoption of
SFAS No. 168 is not anticipated to have a material
impact on Quantas consolidated financial position, results
of operations or cash flows but will result in a change to the
references to accounting principles in its notes to the
consolidated financial statements in the quarter ended
September 30, 2009.
Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted. In June
2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting
for Transfers of Financial Assets an amendment of
FASB Statement No. 140 and SFAS No. 167,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an amendment
to FIN 46(R). Together these new standards aim to
improve the visibility of off-balance sheet vehicles currently
exempt from consolidation and address practice issues involving
the accounting for transfers of financial assets as sales or
secured borrowings. These new standards are effective as of the
beginning of an entitys fiscal year beginning after
November 15, 2009, and for interim periods within that
first year, with earlier adoption prohibited. Accordingly,
Quanta will adopt SFAS Nos. 166 and 167 on January 1,
2010. Quanta has not yet determined the impact, if any,
SFAS Nos. 166 and 167 will have on its consolidated
financial statements.
|
|
4.
|
GOODWILL
AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS:
|
A summary of changes in Quantas goodwill between
December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009 is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric &
|
|
|
Telecom &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Ancillary
|
|
|
Dark Fiber
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
912,649
|
|
|
$
|
113,660
|
|
|
$
|
336,791
|
|
|
$
|
1,363,100
|
|
Purchase price adjustments related to acquisitions closed in
previous quarters
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
912,635
|
|
|
$
|
113,774
|
|
|
$
|
336,791
|
|
|
$
|
1,363,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Other intangible assets are comprised of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Other intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
111,379
|
|
|
$
|
111,379
|
|
Backlog
|
|
|
54,139
|
|
|
|
54,139
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
16,336
|
|
|
|
16,336
|
|
Patented rights and developed technology
|
|
|
16,078
|
|
|
|
16,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets
|
|
|
197,932
|
|
|
|
197,932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
(11,381
|
)
|
|
|
(15,154
|
)
|
Backlog
|
|
|
(38,109
|
)
|
|
|
(41,974
|
)
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
(6,000
|
)
|
|
|
(7,540
|
)
|
Patented rights and developed technology
|
|
|
(1,725
|
)
|
|
|
(2,359
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(57,215
|
)
|
|
|
(67,027
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
$
|
140,717
|
|
|
$
|
130,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses for the amortization of intangible assets were
$9.9 million and $4.9 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2008 and 2009 and $20.5 million and
$9.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008
and 2009. The remaining weighted average amortization period for
all intangible assets as of June 30, 2009 is
11.2 years, while the remaining weighted average
amortization periods for customer relationships, backlog,
non-compete agreements and the patented rights and developed
technology are 13.2 years, 1.9 years, 2.5 years
and 11.2 years, respectively. The estimated future
aggregate amortization expense of intangible assets as of
June 30, 2009 is set forth below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of 2009
|
|
$
|
9,809
|
|
2010
|
|
|
14,147
|
|
2011
|
|
|
13,003
|
|
2012
|
|
|
13,802
|
|
2013
|
|
|
8,770
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
71,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
130,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION:
|
Stock
Incentive Plans
Pursuant to the Quanta Services, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan
(the 2007 Plan), which was adopted on May 24, 2007, Quanta
may award restricted common stock, incentive stock options and
non-qualified stock options. The purpose of the 2007 Plan is to
provide directors, key employees, officers and certain
consultants and advisors with additional performance incentives
by increasing their proprietary interest in Quanta. Prior to the
adoption of the 2007 Plan, Quanta had issued awards of
restricted common stock and stock options under its 2001 Stock
Incentive Plan (as amended and restated March 13, 2003)
(the 2001 Plan), which was terminated effective May 24,
2007, except that outstanding awards will continue to be
governed by the terms of the 2001 Plan. In connection with the
acquisition of InfraSource Services, Inc. (InfraSource) on
August 30, 2007, Quanta assumed InfraSources 2003
Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan and 2004 Omnibus Stock Incentive
Plan, in each case as amended (the InfraSource
17
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Plans). The InfraSource Plans were terminated in connection with
the acquisition, and no further awards will be made under these
plans, although the terms of these plans will govern outstanding
awards. The 2007 Plan, the 2001 Plan and the InfraSource Plans
are referred to as the Plans.
Restricted
Stock
Restricted common stock has been issued under the Plans at the
fair market value of the common stock as of the date of
issuance. The shares of restricted common stock issued are
subject to forfeiture, restrictions on transfer and certain
other conditions until they vest, which generally occurs over
three or four years in equal annual installments. During the
restriction period, the restricted stockholders are entitled to
vote and receive dividends on such shares.
During the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2009,
Quanta granted 78,591 and 38,791 shares of restricted stock
under the 2007 Plan with a weighted average grant price of
$29.07 and $21.27. During the six months ended June 30,
2008 and 2009, Quanta granted 0.8 million and
0.9 million shares of restricted stock under the 2007 Plan
with a weighted average grant price of $23.62 and $22.13.
Additionally, during the three months ended June 30, 2008
and 2009, 61,943 and 63,112 shares vested with an
approximate fair value at the time of vesting of
$1.9 million and $1.4 million. During the six months
ended June 30, 2008 and 2009, 0.6 million and
0.6 million shares vested with an approximate fair value at
the time of vesting of $14.5 million and $10.8 million.
As of June 30, 2009, there was approximately
$26.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to unvested restricted stock granted to both employees
and non-employees. This cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted average period of 2.2 years.
Stock
Options
The stock options granted under the InfraSource Plans, which
were converted to options to acquire Quanta common stock upon
the acquisition of InfraSource, generally vest over four years
and have a maximum term of ten years; however, some options
vested on August 30, 2007 due to change of control
provisions in place in certain InfraSource option or management
agreements, and there has been and may be additional accelerated
vesting if the employment of certain option holders is
terminated within a certain period following the acquisition.
As of June 30, 2009, there was approximately
$1.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to unvested stock options issued under the InfraSource
Plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted
average period of 0.9 year.
Former InfraSource options exercised during the six months ended
June 30, 2009 had an intrinsic value of $0.1 million,
generated $0.1 million of cash proceeds and generated a
nominal amount of associated income tax benefit. Former
InfraSource options exercised during the six months ended
June 30, 2008 had an intrinsic value of $10.6 million,
generated $5.4 million of cash proceeds and generated
$4.1 million of associated income tax benefit.
18
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Non-Cash
Compensation Expense and Related Tax Benefits
The amounts of non-cash compensation expense and related tax
benefits, as well as the amount of actual tax benefits related
to vested restricted stock and options exercised are as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Non-cash compensation expense related to restricted stock
|
|
$
|
3,646
|
|
|
$
|
4,381
|
|
|
$
|
6,447
|
|
|
$
|
8,507
|
|
Non-cash compensation expense related to stock options
|
|
|
937
|
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
|
1,912
|
|
|
|
1,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation included in selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
$
|
4,583
|
|
|
$
|
4,964
|
|
|
$
|
8,359
|
|
|
$
|
9,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual tax benefit (expense) from vested restricted stock
|
|
$
|
388
|
|
|
$
|
(95
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,426
|
|
|
$
|
(1,730
|
)
|
Actual tax benefit for the tax deductions from options exercised
|
|
|
3,637
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
4,279
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual tax benefit (expense) related to stock-based compensation
expense
|
|
|
4,025
|
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
5,705
|
|
|
|
(1,695
|
)
|
Income tax benefit related to non-cash compensation expense
|
|
|
1,787
|
|
|
|
1,936
|
|
|
|
3,260
|
|
|
|
3,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tax benefit related to stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
5,812
|
|
|
$
|
1,861
|
|
|
$
|
8,965
|
|
|
$
|
2,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
PER SHARE
INFORMATION:
|
Basic earnings per share is computed using the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during the period, and
diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period
adjusted for all potentially dilutive common stock equivalents,
except in cases where the effect of the common stock equivalent
would be antidilutive. The amounts used to compute the basic and
diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2009 are illustrated below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
NET INCOME:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stock
|
|
$
|
37,668
|
|
|
$
|
33,427
|
|
|
$
|
59,139
|
|
|
$
|
54,781
|
|
Effect of convertible subordinated notes under the
if-converted method interest expense
addback, net of taxes
|
|
|
4,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stock for diluted earnings per
share
|
|
$
|
42,200
|
|
|
$
|
33,427
|
|
|
$
|
59,139
|
|
|
$
|
54,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding for basic earnings per share
|
|
|
172,393
|
|
|
|
198,300
|
|
|
|
171,681
|
|
|
|
198,365
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock options
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
Effect of convertible subordinated notes under the
if-converted method weighted convertible
shares issuable
|
|
|
24,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding for diluted earnings per
share
|
|
|
197,021
|
|
|
|
198,379
|
|
|
|
172,112
|
|
|
|
198,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, stock
options of approximately 0.1 million shares were excluded
from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the
options exercise prices were greater than the average
market price of Quantas common stock. For the three months
ended June 30, 2008, the effect of assuming conversion of
the 3.75% convertible subordinated notes would have been
antidilutive, and they were therefore excluded from the
calculation of diluted earnings per share. For the six months
ended June 30, 2008, the effect of assuming conversion of
the 4.5% and 3.75% convertible subordinated notes would have
been antidilutive and they were therefore excluded from the
calculation of diluted earnings per share. For the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009, the effect of assuming
conversion of the 3.75% convertible subordinated notes would
have been antidilutive and they were therefore excluded from the
calculation of diluted earnings per share. The 4.5% convertible
subordinated notes were not outstanding during the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009.
Credit
Facility
Quanta has a credit facility with various lenders that provides
for a $475.0 million senior secured revolving credit
facility maturing on September 19, 2012. Subject to the
conditions specified in the credit facility, borrowings under
the credit facility are to be used for working capital, capital
expenditures and other general corporate purposes. The entire
unused portion of the credit facility is available for the
issuance of letters of credit.
As of June 30, 2009, Quanta had approximately
$158.0 million of letters of credit issued under the credit
facility and no outstanding revolving loans. The remaining
$317.0 million was available for revolving loans or issuing
new letters of credit. Amounts borrowed under the credit
facility bear interest, at Quantas option, at a rate equal
to either (a) the Eurodollar Rate (as defined in the credit
facility) plus 0.875% to 1.75%, as determined by the ratio of
Quantas total funded debt to consolidated EBITDA (as
defined in the credit facility), or (b) the base rate (as
described below) plus 0.00% to 0.75%, as determined by the ratio
of Quantas total funded debt to consolidated EBITDA.
Letters of credit issued under the credit facility are subject
to a letter of credit fee of 0.875% to 1.75%, based on the ratio
of Quantas total funded debt to consolidated EBITDA.
Quanta is also subject to a commitment fee of 0.15% to 0.35%,
based on the ratio of its total funded debt to consolidated
EBITDA, on any unused availability under the credit facility.
The base rate equals the higher of (i) the Federal Funds
Rate (as defined in the credit facility) plus
1/2
of 1% or (ii) the banks prime rate.
The credit facility contains certain covenants, including
covenants with respect to maximum funded debt to consolidated
EBITDA, maximum senior debt to consolidated EBITDA and minimum
interest coverage, in each case as specified in the credit
facility. For purposes of calculating the maximum funded debt to
consolidated EBITDA ratio and the maximum senior debt to
consolidated EBITDA ratio, Quantas maximum funded debt and
maximum senior debt are reduced by all cash and cash equivalents
(as defined in the credit facility) held by Quanta in excess of
$25.0 million. As of June 30, 2009, Quanta was in
compliance with all of its covenants. The credit facility limits
certain acquisitions, mergers and consolidations, capital
expenditures, asset sales and prepayments of indebtedness and,
subject to certain exceptions, prohibits liens on material
assets. The credit facility also limits the payment of dividends
and stock repurchase programs in any fiscal year except those
payments or other distributions payable solely in capital stock.
The credit facility provides for customary events of default and
carries cross-default provisions with all of Quantas
existing subordinated notes, its continuing indemnity and
security agreement with its sureties and all of its other debt
instruments exceeding $15.0 million in borrowings. If an
event of default (as defined in the credit facility) occurs and
is continuing, on the terms and subject to the conditions set
forth in the credit facility, amounts outstanding under the
credit facility may be accelerated and may become or be declared
immediately due and payable.
The credit facility is secured by a pledge of all of the capital
stock of Quantas U.S. subsidiaries, 65% of the
capital stock of its foreign subsidiaries and substantially all
of its assets. Quantas U.S. subsidiaries guarantee
the repayment of all amounts due under the credit facility.
Quantas obligations under the credit facility constitute
designated senior indebtedness under its 3.75% convertible
subordinated notes.
20
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
3.75% Convertible
Subordinated Notes
At June 30, 2009, Quanta had outstanding
$143.8 million aggregate principal amount of 3.75%
convertible subordinated notes due 2026 (3.75% Notes). The
resale of the notes and the shares issuable upon conversion
thereof was registered for the benefit of the holders in a shelf
registration statement filed with the SEC. The 3.75% Notes
mature on April 30, 2026 and bear interest at the annual
rate of 3.75%, payable semi-annually on April 30 and
October 30, until maturity.
The $122.3 million and $124.4 million of convertible
subordinated notes on the consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009 is presented net
of a debt discount of $21.5 million and $19.4 million,
which is amortized as interest expense over the remaining
amortization period. This debt discount was recorded in
accordance with the January 1, 2009 adoption of FSP APB
14-1 as
discussed in Notes 1 and 3. The effective interest rate
used to calculate total interest expense for the
3.75% Notes under FSP APB
14-1 was
7.85%. At June 30, 2009, the remaining amortization period
of the debt discount is approximately 3.8 years.
The 3.75% Notes are convertible into Quantas common
stock, based on an initial conversion rate of
44.6229 shares of Quantas common stock per $1,000
principal amount of 3.75% Notes (which is equal to an
initial conversion price of approximately $22.41 per share),
subject to adjustment as a result of certain events. The
3.75% Notes are convertible by the holder (i) during
any fiscal quarter if the closing price of Quantas common
stock is greater than 130% of the conversion price for at least
20 trading days in the period of 30 consecutive trading days
ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding
fiscal quarter, (ii) upon Quanta calling the
3.75% Notes for redemption, (iii) upon the occurrence
of specified distributions to holders of Quantas common
stock or specified corporate transactions or (iv) at any
time on or after March 1, 2026 until the business day
immediately preceding the maturity date of the 3.75% Notes.
The 3.75% Notes are not presently convertible, although
they have been convertible in certain prior quarters as a result
of the satisfaction of the market price condition described in
clause (i) above. If the 3.75% Notes become
convertible under any of these circumstances, Quanta has the
option to deliver cash, shares of Quantas common stock or
a combination thereof, with the amount of cash determined in
accordance with the terms of the indenture under which the notes
were issued. Conversions that may occur in the future could
result in the recording of losses on extinguishment of debt if
the conversions are settled in cash for an amount in excess of
the principal amount. The holders of the 3.75% Notes who
convert their notes in connection with certain change in control
transactions, as defined in the indenture, may be entitled to a
make whole premium in the form of an increase in the conversion
rate. In the event of a change in control, in lieu of paying
holders a make whole premium, if applicable, Quanta may elect,
in some circumstances, to adjust the conversion rate and related
conversion obligations so that the 3.75% Notes are
convertible into shares of the acquiring or surviving company.
Beginning on April 30, 2010 until April 30, 2013,
Quanta may redeem for cash all or part of the 3.75% Notes
at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus accrued
and unpaid interest, if the closing price of Quantas
common stock is equal to or greater than 130% of the conversion
price then in effect for the 3.75% Notes for at least 20
trading days in the 30 consecutive trading day period ending on
the trading day immediately prior to the date of mailing of the
notice of redemption. In addition, Quanta may redeem for cash
all or part of the 3.75% Notes at any time on or after
April 30, 2010 at certain redemption prices, plus accrued
and unpaid interest. Beginning with the six-month interest
period commencing on April 30, 2010, and for each six-month
interest period thereafter, Quanta will be required to pay
contingent interest on any outstanding 3.75% Notes during
the applicable interest period if the average trading price of
the 3.75% Notes reaches a specified threshold. The
contingent interest payable within any applicable interest
period will equal an annual rate of 0.25% of the average trading
price of the 3.75% Notes during a five trading day
reference period.
The holders of the 3.75% Notes may require Quanta to
repurchase all or a part of the notes in cash on each of
April 30, 2013, April 30, 2016 and April 30,
2021, and in the event of a change in control of Quanta, as
defined in the indenture, at a purchase price equal to 100% of
the principal amount of the 3.75% Notes plus accrued and
unpaid
21
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
interest. The 3.75% Notes carry cross-default provisions
with Quantas other debt instruments exceeding
$20.0 million in borrowings, which includes Quantas
existing credit facility.
4.5% Convertible
Subordinated Notes
During 2008, the holders of $269.8 million aggregate
principal amount of Quantas 4.5% convertible subordinated
notes due 2023 (4.5% Notes) elected to convert their notes,
resulting in the issuance of 24,229,781 shares of
Quantas common stock, substantially all of which followed
a notice of redemption by Quanta that it would redeem on
October 8, 2008 all of the 4.5% Notes outstanding
pursuant to the indenture governing the notes. Quanta also
repurchased $106,000 aggregate principal amount of the
4.5% Notes on October 1, 2008 pursuant to the
holders election and redeemed for cash $49,000 aggregate
principal amount of the notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest,
on October 8, 2008. As a result of all of these
transactions, none of the 4.5% Notes remained outstanding
as of October 8, 2008. The 4.5% Notes were originally
issued in October 2003 for an aggregate principal amount of
$270.0 million and required semi-annual interest payments
on April 1 and October 1 until maturity.
Treasury
Stock
Pursuant to the stock incentive plans described in Note 5,
employees may elect to satisfy their tax withholding obligations
upon vesting of restricted stock by having Quanta make such tax
payments and withhold a number of vested shares having a value
on the date of vesting equal to their tax withholding
obligation. As a result of such employee elections, during the
six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2009, Quanta withheld
179,376 and 189,620 shares of Quanta common stock with a
total market value of $4.3 million and $3.4 million
for settlement of employee tax liabilities. These shares were
accounted for as treasury stock. Also, participants may elect a
net settlement upon the exercise of vested stock options. When
such election is made, Quanta withholds from the total number of
shares of Quanta common stock purchased through the exercise
that number of shares of Quanta common stock having a value on
the date of exercise equal to the aggregate exercise price.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, Quanta withheld
and placed into treasury stock 13,213 shares of Quanta
common stock as a result of the net settlement of stock options.
Under Delaware corporate law, treasury stock is not entitled to
vote or be counted for quorum purposes.
Noncontrolling
Interest
During the first quarter of 2009, Quanta acquired a 50% interest
in a joint venture that qualifies as a variable interest entity
under FIN 46(R) and has been included on a consolidated
basis in the accompanying financial statements as described in
Note 2. As a result, income attributable to the other joint
venture member has been accounted for as a reduction of reported
net income to derive net income attributable to the common
stockholders of Quanta. Equity in the consolidated assets and
liabilities of the joint venture attributable to the other joint
venture member has been accounted for as a noncontrolling
interest component of total equity in the accompanying balance
sheet.
Income before income taxes in the condensed consolidated
statements of operations includes $0.2 million and
$0.4 million related to the noncontrolling interest for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009. The carrying
value of the investments held by Quanta and the noncontrolling
interest in the variable interest entity were both approximately
$0.4 million at June 30, 2009. There were no changes
in equity as a result of transfers (to) from the noncontrolling
interest during the period.
22
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Comprehensive
Income
Quantas foreign operations are translated into
U.S. dollars, and a translation adjustment is recorded in
other comprehensive income (loss) as a result. The following
table presents the components of comprehensive income for the
periods presented (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
37,668
|
|
|
$
|
33,644
|
|
|
$
|
59,139
|
|
|
$
|
55,134
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
3,173
|
|
|
|
(1,017
|
)
|
|
|
2,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
37,853
|
|
|
|
36,817
|
|
|
|
58,122
|
|
|
|
57,640
|
|
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to the noncontrolling
interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to common stock
|
|
$
|
37,853
|
|
|
$
|
36,600
|
|
|
$
|
58,122
|
|
|
$
|
57,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quanta reports its results under three reportable segments:
(1) Electric & Gas Infrastructure Services,
(2) Telecom & Ancillary Infrastructure Services
and (3) Dark Fiber. These reportable segments represent the
aggregation of Quantas operating units based on the
divisional structure by which Quantas operations are
internally organized. Prior to the second quarter of 2009,
Quanta reported its results under two business segments, with
all of its operating units, other than the operating unit
comprising Dark Fiber, having been aggregated into the
Infrastructure Services segment. This change to Quantas
segment reporting disclosures provides additional information
that is aligned with the divisional responsibilities that
management uses to oversee the business. As a result, the former
Infrastructure Services segment has been divided into the
Electric & Gas Infrastructure Services and
Telecom & Ancillary Infrastructure Services segments.
The prior periods presented have been restated to reflect the
changed segments.
Operating units are organized into divisions based on
similarities in the predominant type of work performed (i.e.,
greater than 50%) by an operating unit at the point in time
when the divisional designation is made. These types of work are
either electric, gas, telecommunications, ancillary services, or
dark fiber licensing and the operating units within each
division share similar processes for delivering these services
to the same or similar customers within each division. The types
of information and internal reports used by management to
evaluate results of operations at each operating unit, allocate
resources and otherwise manage operating unit performance are
similar and support the aggregation of Quantas operating
segments along divisional lines.
Quanta generally manages its business based on the consolidated
results of its operations achieved through the collective
performance of its stand-alone operating units. Although
Quantas operating units have been aggregated along
divisional lines based on their predominant type of work, the
range of infrastructure services provided by Quantas
operating units is not limited to the predominant type of work
within their given segment. While certain of Quantas
operating units specialize in providing services to customers
within the predominant type of work for their segment, the
majority of Quantas operating units provide infrastructure
services that encompass types of work provided by both the
Electric & Gas Infrastructure Services and
Telecom & Ancillary Infrastructure Services segments
or types of work that are considered common to both segments.
Regardless of the internal reporting division in which
Quantas operating units are included, the predominance of
the type of work performed by an individual operating unit can
change as the operating unit may expand its service capabilities
or develop market opportunities for different types of work.
Electric &
Gas Infrastructure Services Segment
The Electric & Gas Infrastructure Services segment
predominantly provides comprehensive network solutions to
customers in the electric power and gas industries, including
designing, installing, repairing and maintaining network
infrastructure. In addition and to a lesser extent, this segment
provides services to customers in the telecommunications and
cable television industries, as well as various ancillary
services which are similar to the services provided by the
Telecom & Ancillary Infrastructure Services segment.
23
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Telecom &
Ancillary Infrastructure Services Segment
The Telecom & Ancillary Infrastructure Services
segment predominantly provides comprehensive network solutions
to customers in the telecommunications and cable television
industries, including designing, installing, repairing and
maintaining network infrastructure. In addition, and to a lesser
extent, this segment, also provides services to customers in the
electric power and gas industries, which are similar to the
services provided by the Electric & Gas Infrastructure
Services segment.
Dark
Fiber Segment
The Dark Fiber segment designs, procures, constructs and
maintains fiber-optic telecommunications infrastructure in
select markets and licenses the right to use these
point-to-point fiber-optic telecommunications facilities to its
customers. The Dark Fiber segment services educational and
healthcare institutions, large industrial and financial services
customers and other entities with high bandwidth
telecommunication needs. The telecommunication services provided
through this business are generally subject to regulation by the
Federal Communications Commission and certain state public
utility commissions.
Quanta uses the same accounting policies to prepare its
reporting segment results as those that are used to prepare its
consolidated financial statements. Quanta evaluates performance
based on the operating income of the operating units before
income tax, interest and other non-operating income (expense).
Summarized financial information concerning Quantas
reportable segments is presented in the following tables (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric &
|
|
|
Ancillary
|
|
|
Dark Fiber
|
|
|
Corporate &
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009:
|
|
Gas Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,003,539
|
|
|
$
|
353,596
|
|
|
$
|
639,785
|
|
|
$
|
602,582(a
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,599,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
2,016,022
|
|
|
$
|
363,866
|
|
|
$
|
617,888
|
|
|
$
|
556,467(a
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,554,243
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes cash and other corporate assets that are not allocated
to the reporting segments and adjustments to eliminate
intersegment transactions in consolidation. |
24
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric &
|
|
|
Ancillary
|
|
|
Dark Fiber
|
|
|
Corporate &
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009:
|
|
Gas Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Revenues from unaffiliated customers by type of work:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric power services
|
|
$
|
458,796
|
|
|
$
|
12,128
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
470,924
|
|
Gas services
|
|
|
162,952
|
|
|
|
2,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165,627
|
|
Telecommunications and cable television network services
|
|
|
24,709
|
|
|
|
71,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,560
|
|
Ancillary services
|
|
|
27,291
|
|
|
|
30,188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,479
|
|
Dark fiber services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from unaffiliated customers
|
|
$
|
673,748
|
|
|
$
|
116,842
|
|
|
$
|
22,789
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
813,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter-segment revenues
|
|
$
|
2,210
|
|
|
$
|
14,896
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(17,106
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Segment operating income
|
|
|
62,776
|
|
|
|
6,050
|
|
|
|
9,957
|
|
|
|
(18,877
|
)
|
|
|
59,906
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
16,849
|
|
|
|
3,964
|
|
|
|
3,501
|
|
|
|
787
|
|
|
|
25,101
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
14,538
|
|
|
$
|
2,138
|
|
|
$
|
27,441
|
|
|
$
|
(542
|
)
|
|
$
|
43,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric &
|
|
|
Ancillary
|
|
|
Dark Fiber
|
|
|
Corporate &
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008:
|
|
Gas Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Revenues from unaffiliated customers by type of work:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric power services
|
|
$
|
516,332
|
|
|
$
|
15,720
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
532,052
|
|
Gas services
|
|
|
195,266
|
|
|
|
6,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201,925
|
|
Telecommunications and cable television network services
|
|
|
40,104
|
|
|
|
116,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,805
|
|
Ancillary services
|
|
|
27,478
|
|
|
|
29,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,636
|
|
Dark fiber services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from unaffiliated customers
|
|
$
|
779,180
|
|
|
$
|
168,238
|
|
|
$
|
13,464
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
960,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter-segment revenues
|
|
$
|
829
|
|
|
$
|
10,736
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(11,565
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Segment operating income
|
|
|
71,137
|
|
|
|
13,895
|
|
|
|
6,324
|
|
|
|
(18,834
|
)
|
|
|
72,522
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
21,588
|
|
|
|
3,991
|
|
|
|
2,999
|
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
|
29,064
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
21,155
|
|
|
$
|
5,557
|
|
|
$
|
33,709
|
|
|
$
|
(438
|
)
|
|
$
|
59,983
|
|
25
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric &
|
|
|
Ancillary
|
|
|
Dark Fiber
|
|
|
Corporate &
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009:
|
|
Gas Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Revenues from unaffiliated customers by type of work:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric power services
|
|
$
|
951,168
|
|
|
$
|
20,611
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
971,779
|
|
Gas services
|
|
|
253,161
|
|
|
|
3,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256,563
|
|
Telecommunications and cable television network services
|
|
|
44,498
|
|
|
|
125,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,111
|
|
Ancillary services
|
|
|
51,755
|
|
|
|
60,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,782
|
|
Dark fiber services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from unaffiliated customers
|
|
$
|
1,300,582
|
|
|
$
|
209,653
|
|
|
$
|
41,674
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,551,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter-segment revenues
|
|
$
|
3,522
|
|
|
$
|
22,661
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(26,183
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Segment operating income
|
|
|
114,655
|
|
|
|
4,081
|
|
|
|
17,837
|
|
|
|
(38,045
|
)
|
|
|
98,528
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
33,436
|
|
|
|
7,955
|
|
|
|
6,853
|
|
|
|
1,531
|
|
|
|
49,775
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
33,819
|
|
|
$
|
5,727
|
|
|
$
|
45,850
|
|
|
$
|
(556
|
)
|
|
$
|
84,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecom &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric &
|
|
|
Ancillary
|
|
|
Dark Fiber
|
|
|
Corporate &
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008:
|
|
Gas Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Revenues from unaffiliated customers by type of work:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric power services
|
|
$
|
998,559
|
|
|
$
|
21,631
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,020,190
|
|
Gas services
|
|
|
323,136
|
|
|
|
15,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
338,487
|
|
Telecommunications and cable television network services
|
|
|
75,419
|
|
|
|
225,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,863
|
|
Ancillary services
|
|
|
55,039
|
|
|
|
64,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,112
|
|
Dark fiber services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from unaffiliated customers
|
|
$
|
1,452,153
|
|
|
$
|
326,499
|
|
|
$
|
26,672
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,805,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter-segment revenues
|
|
$
|
1,263
|
|
|
$
|
16,111
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(17,374
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Segment operating income
|
|
|
110,437
|
|
|
|
29,405
|
|
|
|
10,983
|
|
|
|
(35,732
|
)
|
|
|
115,093
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
44,527
|
|
|
|
7,296
|
|
|
|
5,820
|
|
|
|
1,003
|
|
|
|
58,646
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$
|
47,605
|
|
|
$
|
11,518
|
|
|
$
|
53,849
|
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
$
|
113,149
|
|
Foreign
Operations
Quanta does not have significant operations or long-lived assets
in countries outside of the United States. Quanta derived
$19.3 million and $34.4 million of its revenues from
foreign operations during the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009. Quanta derived $27.1 million and
$51.5 million of its revenues from foreign operations
during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008. The
majority of revenues from foreign operations was earned in
Canada during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008
and 2009.
26
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
10.
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES:
|
Joint
Venture Contingencies
As described in Note 2, one of Quantas subsidiaries
entered into a joint venture with a third party engineering
company during the first quarter of 2009 for the purpose of
providing infrastructure services under a contract with a large
utility customer. Losses incurred by the joint venture are
typically shared equally by the joint venture members. However,
under the terms of the joint venture agreement, each member of
the joint venture has guaranteed all of the obligations of the
joint venture under the contract with the customer and therefore
can be liable for full performance of the contract to the
customer. Quanta is not aware of circumstances that would lead
to future claims against it for material amounts in connection
with this performance guarantee.
In addition, as described in Note 2, another of
Quantas subsidiaries began operations during the first
quarter of 2009 in a joint venture with a third party for the
purpose of providing joint engineering and construction services
for the design and installation of fuel storage facilities under
a contract with a specific customer. Under the joint venture
agreement, the losses incurred by the joint venture are
typically shared equally by the joint venture partners. However,
the joint venture is a general partnership, and as such, the
joint venture partners are jointly and severally liable for all
of the obligations of the joint venture, including obligations
owed to the customer or any other person or entity. Quanta is
not aware of circumstances that would lead to future claims
against it for material amounts in connection with its joint and
several liability.
In each of the above joint venture arrangements, each joint
venturer has indemnified the other for any liabilities incurred
in excess of the liabilities for which the joint venturer is
obligated to bear under the respective joint venture agreement.
It is possible, however, that Quanta could be required to pay or
perform obligations in excess of its share if the other joint
venturer failed or refused to pay or perform its share of the
obligations. Quanta is not aware of circumstances that would
lead to future claims against it for material amounts that would
not be indemnified.
Leases
Quanta leases certain land, buildings and equipment under
non-cancelable lease agreements, including related party leases.
The terms of these agreements vary from lease to lease,
including some with renewal options and escalation clauses. The
following schedule shows the future minimum lease payments under
these leases as of June 30, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of 2009
|
|
$
|
29,195
|
|
2010
|
|
|
41,615
|
|
2011
|
|
|
31,757
|
|
2012
|
|
|
21,317
|
|
2013
|
|
|
15,959
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
16,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
156,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense related to operating leases was approximately
$26.5 million and $54.4 million for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 and approximately $26.3 million
and $52.7 million for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008.
Quanta has guaranteed the residual value on certain of its
equipment operating leases. Quanta guarantees the difference
between this residual value and the fair market value of the
underlying asset at the date of termination of the leases. At
June 30, 2009, the maximum guaranteed residual value was
approximately $147.3 million. Quanta
27
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
believes that no significant payments will be made as a result
of the difference between the fair market value of the leased
equipment and the guaranteed residual value. However, there can
be no assurance that significant payments will not be required
in the future.
Committed
Capital Expenditures
Quanta has committed capital for expansion of its dark fiber
network. Quanta typically does not commit capital to new network
expansions until it has a committed licensing arrangement in
place with at least one customer. The amounts of committed
capital expenditures are estimates of costs required to build
the networks under contract. The actual capital expenditures
related to building the networks could vary materially from
these estimates. As of June 30, 2009, Quanta estimates
these committed capital expenditures to be approximately
$27.8 million for the period July 1, 2009 through
December 31, 2009 and $2.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2010.
Litigation
Quanta is also from time to time party to various lawsuits,
claims and other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary
course of business. These actions typically seek, among other
things, compensation for alleged personal injury, breach of
contract
and/or
property damages, punitive damages, civil penalties or other
losses, or injunctive or declaratory relief. With respect to all
such lawsuits, claims and proceedings, Quanta records reserves
when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the
amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. Quanta does not
believe that any of these proceedings, separately or in the
aggregate, would be expected to have a material adverse effect
on Quantas financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
Concentration
of Credit Risk
Quanta is subject to concentrations of credit risk related
primarily to its cash and cash equivalents and accounts
receivable. Substantially all of Quantas cash investments
are managed by what it believes to be high credit quality
financial institutions. In accordance with Quantas
investment policies, these institutions are authorized to invest
this cash in a diversified portfolio of what Quanta believes to
be high quality investments, which consist primarily of
interest-bearing demand deposits, money market mutual funds and
investment grade commercial paper with original maturities of
three months or less. Although Quanta does not currently believe
the principal amount of these investments is subject to any
material risk of loss, the recent volatility in the financial
markets is likely to significantly impact the interest income
Quanta receives from these investments. In addition, Quanta
grants credit under normal payment terms, generally without
collateral, to its customers, which include electric power and
gas companies, telecommunications and cable television system
operators, governmental entities, general contractors, and
builders, owners and managers of commercial and industrial
properties located primarily in the United States. Consequently,
Quanta is subject to potential credit risk related to changes in
business and economic factors throughout the United States,
which may be heightened as a result of the current financial
crisis and volatility of the markets. However, Quanta generally
has certain statutory lien rights with respect to services
provided. Under certain circumstances, such as foreclosures or
negotiated settlements, Quanta may take title to the underlying
assets in lieu of cash in settlement of receivables. In such
circumstances, extended time frames may be required to liquidate
these assets, causing the amounts realized to differ from the
value of the assumed receivable. Historically, some of
Quantas customers have experienced significant financial
difficulties, and others may experience financial difficulties
in the future. These difficulties expose Quanta to increased
risk related to collectibility of receivables for services
Quanta has performed. One customer accounted for approximately
11% of consolidated revenues during the three months ended
June 30, 2009. Revenues from this customer are included in
the Electric & Gas Infrastructure Services segment. No
other customer represented 10% or more of revenues during the
three and six months ended June 30, 2008 or 2009. None of
Quantas customers accounted for 10% or more of accounts
receivable at June 30, 2009.
28
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Self-Insurance
Quanta is insured for employers liability, general
liability, auto liability and workers compensation claims.
Through July 31, 2009, employers liability claims
were subject to a deductible of $1.0 million per
occurrence, general liability and auto liability claims were
subject to a deductible of $3.0 million per occurrence, and
workers compensation claims were subject to a deductible
of $2.0 million per occurrence. Additionally, through
July 31, 2009, Quantas workers compensation
claims were subject to an annual cumulative aggregate liability
of up to $1.0 million on claims in excess of
$2.0 million per occurrence. As of August 1, 2009,
Quanta renewed its employers liability, general liability,
auto liability and workers compensation policies for the
2009 to 2010 policy year. As a result of the renewal, the
deductibles for all policies have increased to $5.0 million
per occurrence. Additionally, in connection with this renewal,
the amount of letters of credit required by Quanta to secure its
obligations under its casualty insurance program, which is
discussed further below, has increased. Quanta also has employee
health care benefit plans for most employees not subject to
collective bargaining agreements, of which the primary plan is
subject to a deductible of $350,000 per claimant per year.
Losses under all of these insurance programs are accrued based
upon Quantas estimates of the ultimate liability for
claims reported and an estimate of claims incurred but not
reported, with assistance from third-party actuaries. These
insurance liabilities are difficult to assess and estimate due
to unknown factors, including the severity of an injury, the
determination of Quantas liability in proportion to other
parties, the number of incidents not reported and the
effectiveness of its safety program. The accruals are based upon
known facts and historical trends and management believes such
accruals to be adequate. As of December 31, 2008 and
June 30, 2009, the gross amount accrued for insurance
claims totaled $147.9 million and $145.2 million, with
$105.0 million and $103.1 million considered to be
long-term and included in other non-current liabilities. Related
insurance recoveries/receivables as of December 31, 2008
and June 30, 2009 were $12.5 million and
$12.1 million, of which $7.2 million and
$5.8 million are included in prepaid expenses and other
current assets and $5.3 million and $6.3 million are
included in other assets, net.
Letters
of Credit
Certain of Quantas vendors require letters of credit to
ensure reimbursement for amounts they are disbursing on its
behalf, such as to beneficiaries under its self-funded insurance
programs. In addition, from time to time some customers require
Quanta to post letters of credit to ensure payment to its
subcontractors and vendors under those contracts and to
guarantee performance under its contracts. Such letters of
credit are generally issued by a bank or similar financial
institution. The letter of credit commits the issuer to pay
specified amounts to the holder of the letter of credit if the
holder demonstrates that Quanta has failed to perform specified
actions. If this were to occur, Quanta would be required to
reimburse the issuer of the letter of credit. Depending on the
circumstances of such a reimbursement, Quanta may also have to
record a charge to earnings for the reimbursement. Quanta does
not believe that it is likely that any material claims will be
made under a letter of credit in the foreseeable future.
As of June 30, 2009, Quanta had $158.0 million in
letters of credit outstanding under its credit facility
primarily to secure obligations under its casualty insurance
program. These are irrevocable stand-by letters of credit with
maturities generally expiring at various times throughout 2009
and 2010. Upon maturity, it is expected that the majority of
these letters of credit will be renewed for subsequent one-year
periods.
Performance
Bonds and Parent Guarantees
In certain circumstances, Quanta is required to provide
performance bonds in connection with its contractual
commitments. Quanta has indemnified its sureties for any
expenses paid out under these performance bonds. As of
June 30, 2009, the total amount of outstanding performance
bonds was approximately $908.6 million, and the estimated
cost to complete these bonded projects was approximately
$228.1 million.
29
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Quanta, from time to time, guarantees the obligations of its
wholly owned subsidiaries, including obligations under certain
contracts with customers, certain lease obligations and, in some
states, obligations in connection with obtaining
contractors licenses. Quanta has also guaranteed the
obligations of its wholly owned subsidiary under the joint
venture arrangement with a third party engineering company
entered into in the first quarter of 2009, which is described in
Notes 2 and 8.
Employment
Agreements
Quanta has various employment agreements with certain executives
and other employees, which provide for compensation and certain
other benefits and for severance payments under certain
circumstances. Certain employment agreements also contain
clauses that become effective upon a change of control of
Quanta. In addition, employment agreements between InfraSource
and certain of its executives and employees included provisions
that became effective upon termination of employment within a
specified time period, generally two years, following the change
of control of InfraSource. Upon the occurrence of any of the
defined events in the various employment agreements, Quanta will
pay certain amounts to the employee, which vary with the level
of the employees responsibility.
Collective
Bargaining Agreements
Certain of Quantas subsidiaries are party to various
collective bargaining agreements with certain of their
employees. The agreements require such subsidiaries to pay
specified wages, provide certain benefits to their union
employees and contribute certain amounts to multi-employer
pension plans and employee benefit trusts. If the participating
subsidiaries withdrew from, or otherwise terminated
participation in, one or more multi-employer pension plans or
the plans were to otherwise become underfunded, the subsidiaries
could be assessed liabilities for additional contributions
related to the underfunding of these plans. The collective
bargaining agreements expire at various times and have typically
been renegotiated and renewed on terms similar to the ones
contained in the expiring agreements.
Indemnities
Quanta has indemnified various parties against specified
liabilities that those parties might incur in the future in
connection with Quantas previous acquisitions of certain
companies. The indemnities under acquisition agreements usually
are contingent upon the other party incurring liabilities that
reach specified thresholds. Quanta also generally indemnifies
its customers for the services it provides under its contracts,
as well as other specified liabilities, which may subject Quanta
to indemnity claims and liabilities and related litigation. As
of June 30, 2009, Quanta is not aware of any asserted
claims against it for material amounts in connection with these
indemnity obligations.
30
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition
and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our
condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes
included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
and with our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, which was filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 2,
2009 and is available on the SECs website at www.sec.gov
and on our website, which is www.quantaservices.com. The
discussion below contains forward-looking statements that are
based upon our current expectations and are subject to
uncertainty and changes in circumstances. Actual results may
differ materially from these expectations due to inaccurate
assumptions and known or unknown risks and uncertainties,
including those identified under the headings Uncertainty
of Forward-Looking Statements and Information below in
this Item 2 and Risk Factors in Item 1A of
Part II of this Quarterly Report.
Introduction
We are a leading national provider of specialty contracting
services, offering end-to-end network solutions to the electric
power, gas, telecommunications and cable television industries.
We believe we are one of the largest contractors servicing the
transmission and distribution sector of the North American
electric utility industry.
We had consolidated revenues for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 of approximately $1.55 billion, of which
62.6% was attributable to electric power work, 16.5% to gas
work, 11.0% to telecommunications and cable television work,
7.2% to ancillary services and 2.7% to dark fiber services.
Effective during the quarter ended June 30, 2009, we began
reporting our results under three reportable segments:
(1) Electric & Gas Infrastructure Services,
(2) Telecom & Ancillary Infrastructure Services
and (3) Dark Fiber. These reportable segments are based on
the divisional structure by which our operating units are
internally organized. For internal management purposes, each of
Quantas operating units is organized into an internal
reporting division based on the predominant type of work
(i.e., greater than 50%), which is either electric, gas,
telecommunications, ancillary services or dark fiber licensing,
performed by the operating unit as of the point in time when the
designation is made. Prior to the quarter ended June 30,
2009, we reported our results under two business segments, with
all of our operating segments, other than the operating segment
comprising the Dark Fiber segment, having been aggregated into
the Infrastructure Services segment.
Electric &
Gas Infrastructure Services and Telecom & Ancillary
Infrastructure Services Segments
These segments are composed of the same operating segments that
had previously comprised the Infrastructure Services segment.
They provide comprehensive network solutions to customers across
the electric power, gas, telecommunications and cable television
industries, including designing, installing, repairing and
maintaining network infrastructure. In addition, they provide
ancillary services, such as inside electrical wiring,
intelligent traffic networks, cable and control systems for
light rail lines, airports and highways, and specialty rock
trenching, directional boring and road milling for industrial
and commercial customers.
Our customers include many of the leading companies in the
industries we serve. We have developed strong strategic
alliances with numerous customers and strive to develop and
maintain our status as a preferred vendor to our customers. We
enter into various types of contracts, including competitive
unit price, hourly rate, cost-plus (or time and materials
basis), and fixed price (or lump sum basis), the final terms and
prices of which we frequently negotiate with the customer.
Although the terms of our contracts vary considerably, most are
made on either a unit price or fixed price basis in which we
agree to do the work for a price per unit of work performed
(unit price) or for a fixed amount for the entire project (fixed
price). We complete a substantial majority of our fixed price
projects within one year, while we frequently provide
maintenance and repair work under open-ended unit price or
cost-plus master service agreements that are renewable annually.
We recognize revenue on our unit price and cost-plus contracts
as units are completed or services are performed. For our fixed
price contracts, we record revenues as work on the contract
progresses on a percentage-of-completion basis. Under this
method, revenue is recognized based on the percentage of total
costs incurred to date in proportion to total
31
estimated costs to complete the contract. Fixed price contracts
generally include retainage provisions under which a percentage
of the contract price is withheld until the project is complete
and has been accepted by our customer.
Dark
Fiber Segment
The Dark Fiber segment designs, procures, constructs and
maintains fiber-optic telecommunications infrastructure in
select markets and licenses the right to use these
point-to-point fiber-optic telecommunications facilities to our
customers pursuant to licensing agreements, typically with lease
terms from five to twenty-five years, inclusive of certain
renewal options. Under those agreements, customers are provided
the right to use a portion of the capacity of a fiber-optic
facility, with the facility owned and maintained by us. Revenues
earned pursuant to these fiber-optic facility licensing
agreements, including any initial fees or advanced billings, are
recognized ratably over the expected length of the agreements,
including probable renewal periods. The Dark Fiber segment
services educational and healthcare institutions, large
industrial and financial services customers and other entities
with high bandwidth telecommunication needs. The
telecommunication services provided through this segment are
subject to regulation by the Federal Communications Commission
and certain state public utility commissions.
Seasonality;
Fluctuations of Results; Economic Conditions
Our revenues and results of operations can be subject to
seasonal and other variations. These variations are influenced
by weather, customer spending patterns, bidding seasons, project
schedules and timing and holidays. Typically, our revenues are
lowest in the first quarter of the year because cold, snowy or
wet conditions cause delays. The second quarter is typically
better than the first, as some projects begin, but continued
cold and wet weather can often impact second quarter
productivity. The third quarter is typically the best of the
year, as a greater number of projects are underway and weather
is more accommodating to work on projects. Revenues during the
fourth quarter of the year are typically lower than the third
quarter but higher than the second quarter. Many projects are
completed in the fourth quarter, and revenues are often impacted
positively by customers seeking to spend their capital budget
before the end of the year; however, the holiday season and
inclement weather sometimes can cause delays and thereby reduce
revenues and increase costs.
Additionally, our industry can be highly cyclical. As a result,
our volume of business may be adversely affected by declines or
delays in new projects in various geographic regions in the
United States. Project schedules, in particular in connection
with larger, longer-term projects, can also create fluctuations
in the services provided under projects, which may adversely
affect us in a given quarter. The financial condition of our
customers and their access to capital, variations in the margins
of projects performed during any particular quarter, regional,
national and global economic and market conditions, timing of
acquisitions, timing and magnitude of assimilation costs
associated with acquisitions and interest rate fluctuations may
also materially affect quarterly results. Accordingly, our
operating results in any particular quarter or year may not be
indicative of the results that can be expected for any other
quarter or for any other year.
We recognize that we and our customers are operating in a
challenging business environment in light of the economic
downturn and weak capital markets. We are closely monitoring our
customers and the effect that changes in economic and market
conditions may have on them. Certain of our customers have
reduced spending in the first half of 2009, which we attribute
to the negative economic and market conditions, and we
anticipate that these negative conditions may continue to affect
demand for some of our services in the near-term. However, we
believe that most of our customers, many of whom are regulated
utilities, remain financially stable in general and will be able
to continue with their business plans in the long-term without
substantial constraints. You should read Outlook
and Understanding Gross Margins for
additional discussion of trends and challenges that may affect
our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Understanding
Gross Margins
Our gross margin is gross profit expressed as a percentage of
revenues. Cost of services, which is subtracted from revenues to
obtain gross profit, consists primarily of salaries, wages and
benefits to employees, depreciation, fuel and other equipment
expenses, equipment rentals, subcontracted services, insurance,
facilities expenses,
32
materials and parts and supplies. Various factors
some controllable, some not impact our gross margins
on a quarterly or annual basis.
Seasonal and Geographical. As discussed above,
seasonal patterns can have a significant impact on gross
margins. Generally, business is slower in the winter months
versus the warmer months of the year. This can be offset
somewhat by increased demand for electrical service and repair
work resulting from severe weather. In addition, the mix of
business conducted in different parts of the country will affect
margins, as some parts of the country offer the opportunity for
higher gross margins than others due to the geographic
characteristics associated with the physical location where the
work is being performed. Such characteristics include whether
the project is performed in an urban versus a rural setting or
in a mountainous area or in open terrain. Site conditions,
including unforeseen underground conditions, can also impact
margins.
Weather. Adverse or favorable weather
conditions can impact gross margins in a given period. For
example, it is typical in the first quarter of any fiscal year
that parts of the country may experience snow or rainfall that
may negatively impact our revenues and gross margin due to
reduced productivity. In many cases, projects may be delayed or
temporarily placed on hold. Conversely, in periods when weather
remains dry and temperatures are accommodating, more work can be
done, sometimes with less cost, which would have a favorable
impact on gross margins. In some cases, severe weather, such as
hurricanes and ice storms, can provide us with higher margin
emergency restoration service work, which generally has a
positive impact on margins.
Revenue Mix. The mix of revenues derived from
the industries we serve will impact gross margins, as certain
industries provide higher margin opportunities. Additionally,
changes in our customers spending patterns in each of the
industries we serve can cause an imbalance in supply and demand
and, therefore, affect margins and mix of revenues by industry
served.
Service and Maintenance versus
Installation. Installation work is often obtained
on a fixed price basis, while maintenance work is often
performed under pre-established or negotiated prices or
cost-plus pricing arrangements. Gross margins for installation
work may vary from project to project, and can be higher than
maintenance work, because work obtained on a fixed price basis
has higher risk than other types of pricing arrangements. We
typically derive approximately 50% of our annual revenues from
maintenance work, but a higher portion of installation work in
any given period may affect our gross margins for that period.
Subcontract Work. Work that is subcontracted
to other service providers generally yields lower gross margins.
An increase in subcontract work in a given period may contribute
to a decrease in gross margin. We typically subcontract
approximately 10% to 15% of our work to other service providers.
Materials versus Labor. Margins may be lower
on projects on which we furnish materials as our
mark-up on
materials is generally lower than on labor costs. In a given
period, a higher percentage of work that has a higher materials
component may decrease overall gross margin.
Depreciation. We include depreciation in cost
of services. This is common practice in our industry, but it can
make comparability to other companies difficult. This must be
taken into consideration when comparing us to other companies.
Insurance. Gross margins could be impacted by
fluctuations in insurance accruals as additional claims arise
and as circumstances and conditions of existing claims change.
We are insured for employers liability, general liability,
auto liability and workers compensation claims. Through
July 31, 2009, employers liability claims were
subject to a deductible of $1.0 million per occurrence,
general liability and auto liability claims were subject to a
deductible of $3.0 million per occurrence, and
workers compensation claims were subject to a deductible
of $2.0 million per occurrence. Additionally, through
July 31, 2009, our workers compensation claims were
subject to an annual cumulative aggregate liability of up to
$1.0 million on claims in excess of $2.0 million per
occurrence. As of August 1, 2009, we renewed our
employers liability, general liability, auto liability and
workers compensation policies for the 2009 to 2010 policy
year. As a result of the renewal, the deductibles for all
policies have increased to $5.0 million per occurrence. We
also have employee health care benefit plans for most employees
not subject to collective bargaining agreements, of which the
primary plan is subject to a deductible of $350,000 per claimant
per year.
33
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily
of compensation and related benefits to management,
administrative salaries and benefits, marketing, office rent and
utilities, communications, professional fees, bad debt expense,
gains and losses on the sale of property and equipment, letter
of credit fees and maintenance, training and conversion costs
related to the implementation of an information technology
solution.
Results
of Operations
The results of operations data below for the three and six month
periods ended June 30, 2008 has been retrospectively
restated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Staff Position (FSP) FSP APB
14-1,
Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be
Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial
Settlement). For more details regarding how the adoption
of FSP APB
14-1
impacted Quantas consolidated financial statements, see
Note 3 to our condensed consolidated financial statements.
The following table sets forth selected statements of operations
data and such data as a percentage of revenues for the three and
six month periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
960,882
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
813,379
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,805,324
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,551,909
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of services (including depreciation)
|
|
|
802,192
|
|
|
|
83.5
|
|
|
|
675,597
|
|
|
|
83.1
|
|
|
|
1,522,757
|
|
|
|
84.3
|
|
|
|
1,296,996
|
|
|
|
83.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
158,690
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
137,782
|
|
|
|
16.9
|
|
|
|
282,567
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
254,913
|
|
|
|
16.4
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
76,292
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
72,970
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
147,008
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
146,573
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
9,876
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
4,906
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
20,466
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
9,812
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
72,522
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
59,906
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
115,093
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
98,528
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(9,722
|
)
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(2,803
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(19,316
|
)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
(5,621
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
2,088
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
628
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
6,083
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
1,709
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
65,166
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
57,889
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
102,342
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
94,850
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
27,498
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
24,245
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
43,203
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
39,716
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
37,668
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
33,644
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
59,139
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
55,134
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stock
|
|
$
|
37,668
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
33,427
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
59,139
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
54,781
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three months
ended June 30, 2008
Revenues. Revenues decreased
$147.5 million, or 15.4%, to $813.4 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2009. Revenues from electric
power services decreased by approximately $61.1 million, or
11.5%, revenues from telecommunications and cable television
network services decreased by approximately $60.2 million,
or 38.4%, and revenues from gas services decreased by
approximately $36.3 million, or 18.0%, while revenues from
ancillary services increased nominally. Overall, revenues were
negatively impacted by decreases in the number and size of
projects as a result of reduced capital spending by our
customers. Revenues from electric power services were also
impacted by a decrease in revenues from emergency restoration
services of approximately $8.1 million from
$23.1 million in the second quarter of 2008 to
$15.0 million in the second quarter of 2009. Partially
offsetting these decreases was an increase in our dark fiber
revenues from $13.5 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2008 to $22.8 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2009. This increase in our dark fiber
revenues is a result of our continued network expansion and the
associated revenues from licensing the right to use
point-to-point fiber-optic telecommunications facilities.
34
Gross profit. Gross profit decreased
$20.9 million, or 13.2%, to $137.8 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease in gross
profit resulted primarily from the effect of the decreased
revenues discussed above. As a percentage of revenues, gross
margin increased from 16.5% for the three months ended
June 30, 2008 to 16.9% for the three months ended
June 30, 2009, primarily as a result of higher margins
associated with certain of our electric power services and
improved margins in ancillary services resulting from the
completion of work under certain low margin contracts in 2008
that did not recur in 2009. In addition, gross margins were
favorably impacted by increased dark fiber revenues, which
historically generate higher gross margins than our other
services. Partially offsetting these increases were decreases in
margins from our gas and telecommunication services, primarily
due to less ability to cover fixed costs as a result of lower
revenues, as well as lower margins on certain gas transmission
projects.
Selling, general and administrative
expenses. Selling, general and administrative
expenses decreased $3.3 million, or 4.4%, to
$73.0 million for the three months ended June 30,
2009. The decrease in selling, general and administrative
expenses was due to lower salaries and benefits costs primarily
associated with a decrease in performance bonuses of
approximately $4.4 million resulting from current levels of
operating activity. Partially offsetting this decrease were
higher professional fees of approximately $0.5 million
associated with renewable energy initiatives during the second
quarter of 2009 and non-capitalizable costs of $0.5 million
associated with the ongoing implementation of information
technology solutions. As a percentage of revenues, selling,
general and administrative expenses increased from 7.9% to 8.9%
due to the lower revenues earned in second quarter of 2009.
Amortization of intangible
assets. Amortization of intangible assets
decreased $5.0 million to $4.9 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2009. This decrease is primarily due
to the run-off of amortization associated with the backlog
acquired during 2007.
Interest expense. Interest expense for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 decreased
$6.9 million as compared to the three months ended
June 30, 2008, primarily due to the conversion, redemption
and repurchase of all remaining 4.5% convertible subordinated
notes that occurred in the third quarter of 2008.
Interest income. Interest income was
$0.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2009,
compared to $2.1 million for the quarter ended
June 30, 2008. The decrease results primarily from
substantially lower interest rates partially offset by a higher
average cash balance for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as
compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2008.
Provision for income taxes. The provision for
income taxes was $24.2 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2009, with an effective tax rate of 41.9%. The
provision for income taxes was $27.5 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2008, with an effective tax rate of
42.2%.
Six
months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the six months ended
June 30, 2008
Revenues. Revenues decreased
$253.4 million, or 14.0%, to $1.55 billion for the six
months ended June 30, 2009. Revenues from
telecommunications and cable television network services
decreased by approximately $130.8 million, or 43.5%,
revenues from gas services decreased by approximately
$81.9 million, or 24.2%, revenues from electric power
services decreased by approximately $48.4 million, or 4.7%,
and revenues from ancillary services decreased approximately
$7.3 million, or 6.2%. Overall, revenues were negatively
impacted by decreases in the number and size of projects as a
result of reduced capital spending by our customers. Partially
offsetting the decrease in revenues from electric power services
was an increase in revenues from emergency restoration services
of approximately $15.6 million from $45.7 million in
the six months ended June 30, 2008 to $61.3 million in
the six months ended June 30, 2009. Additionally, our dark
fiber revenues increased from $26.7 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 to $41.7 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2009. This increase in our dark
fiber revenues is a result of our continued network expansion
and the associated revenues from licensing the right to use
point-to-point fiber-optic telecommunications facilities.
Gross profit. Gross profit decreased
$27.7 million, or 9.8%, to $254.9 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease in gross profit
resulted primarily from the effect of the decreased revenues
discussed above. As a percentage of revenues, gross margin
increased from 15.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2008
to 16.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The
increase in gross margin is primarily due to a higher amount of
35
emergency restoration services discussed above, which typically
generate higher margins. Also contributing to this increase in
gross margin are higher margins in connection with certain of
our electric power services as well as improved margins in
ancillary services resulting from the completion of work under
certain low margin contracts in 2008 that did not recur in 2009.
Gross margins were also favorably impacted by increased dark
fiber revenues, which historically generate higher gross margins
than our other services. Partially offsetting these increases
were decreases in margins from our gas and telecommunication
services, primarily due to less ability to cover fixed costs as
a result of lower revenues, as well as lower margins on certain
gas transmission projects.
Selling, general and administrative
expenses. Selling, general and administrative
expenses decreased $0.4 million, or 0.3%, to
$146.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses was
due to lower salaries and benefits costs primarily associated
with a decrease in performance bonuses of approximately
$4.3 million resulting from current levels of operating
activity. Partially offsetting this decrease were higher
professional fees of approximately $1.8 million associated
with ongoing litigation and our renewable energy initiatives, as
well as an increase in non-capitalizable costs of
$1.5 million associated with the ongoing implementation of
information technology solutions. As a percentage of revenues,
selling, general and administrative expenses increased from 8.1%
to 9.4% due to the lower revenues earned in the six months ended
June 30, 2009.
Amortization of intangible
assets. Amortization of intangible assets
decreased $10.7 million to $9.8 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2009. This decrease is primarily due
to the run-off of amortization associated with the backlog
acquired during 2007.
Interest expense. Interest expense for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 decreased $13.7 million as
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008, primarily
due to the conversion, redemption and repurchase of all
remaining 4.5% convertible subordinated notes that occurred in
the third quarter of 2008.
Interest income. Interest income was
$1.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009,
compared to $6.1 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2008. The decrease resulted primarily from
substantially lower interest rates partially offset by a higher
average cash balance for the six months ended June 30, 2009
as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Provision for income taxes. The provision for
income taxes was $39.7 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2009, with an effective tax rate of 41.9%. The
provision for income taxes was $43.2 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2008, with an effective tax rate of
42.2%.
Business
Segment Analysis
We manage our business based on the consolidated results of our
operations achieved through the collective performance of our
stand-alone operating units, which have been aggregated into
three reportable segments: (1) Electric & Gas
Infrastructure Services, (2) Telecom & Ancillary
Infrastructure Services and (3) Dark Fiber. Our reported
business segments are subject to a greater degree of volatility
in their respective results of operations as a result of the
impact of multiple factors, including the outcome related to
job-specific performance risks, fluctuations
36
in the level of inter-segment contracting activities, and
variations in the different types of services that are provided
by each business segment as a result of evolving market
conditions.
Three
months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three months
ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Electric &
|
|
|
Telecom &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric &
|
|
|
Telecom &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Ancillary
|
|
|
Dark Fiber
|
|
|
Corporate &
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Ancillary
|
|
|
Dark Fiber
|
|
|
Corporate &
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Revenues from unaffiliated customers by type of work:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric power services
|
|
$
|
516,332
|
|
|
$
|
15,720
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
532,052
|
|
|
$
|
458,796
|
|
|
$
|
12,128
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
470,924
|
|
Gas services
|
|
|
195,266
|
|
|
|
6,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201,925
|
|
|
|
162,952
|
|
|
|
2,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165,627
|
|
Telecommunications and cable television network services
|
|
|
40,104
|
|
|
|
116,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,805
|
|
|
|
24,709
|
|
|
|
71,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,560
|
|
Ancillary services
|
|
|
27,478
|
|
|
|
29,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,636
|
|
|
|
27,291
|
|
|
|
30,188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,479
|
|
Dark fiber services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from unaffiliated customers
|
|
$
|
779,180
|
|
|
$
|
168,238
|
|
|
$
|
13,464
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
960,882
|
|
|
$
|
673,748
|
|
|
$
|
116,842
|
|
|
$
|
22,789
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
813,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income
|
|
$
|
71,137
|
|
|
$
|
13,895
|
|
|
$
|
6,324
|
|
|
$
|
(18,834
|
)
|
|
$
|
72,522
|
|
|
$
|
62,776
|
|
|
$
|
6,050
|
|
|
$
|
9,957
|
|
|
$
|
(18,877
|
)
|
|
$
|
59,906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric &
Gas Infrastructure Services Segment
Revenues. Revenues decreased
$105.4 million, or 13.5%, to $673.7 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2009. Revenues from electric
power services decreased by approximately $57.5 million, or
11.1%, revenues from gas services decreased by approximately
$32.3 million, or 16.5%, revenues from telecommunications
and cable television network services decreased by approximately
$15.4 million, or 38.4%, and revenues from ancillary
services remained constant. Overall, revenues were negatively
impacted by decreases in the number and size of projects as a
result of reduced capital spending by our customers. Revenues
from electric power services were also impacted by a decrease in
revenues from emergency restoration services of approximately
$8.1 million from $23.1 million in the second quarter
of 2008 to $15.0 million in the second quarter of 2009.
Operating Income. Operating income decreased
$8.4 million to $62.8 million in the
Electric & Gas Infrastructure Services segment for the
three months ended June 30, 2009. The decrease in operating
income resulted primarily from the effect of the decreased
revenues discussed above. Operating income as a percentage of
revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2009 increased
slightly from 9.1% to 9.3%, primarily as a result of higher
margins associated with certain of our electric power services
and improved margins in ancillary services resulting from the
completion of work under certain low margin contracts in 2008
that did not recur in 2009. Partially offsetting these increases
were decreases in margins from our gas and telecommunications
services, primarily due to less ability to cover fixed costs as
a result of lower revenues, as well as lower margins on certain
gas transmission projects.
Telecom &
Ancillary Infrastructure Services Segment
Revenues. Revenues decreased
$51.4 million, or 30.5%, to $116.8 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2009. Of the total decrease,
$44.9 million relates to telecommunication services, which
decreased 38.4% from the second quarter of 2008 due to decreases
in the number and size of projects as a result of reduced
capital spending by our customers. The remaining decrease is
associated with electric power and gas services, which were
impacted by similar market effects, although these services
represent a smaller portion of this segments revenues.
Revenues from ancillary services increased nominally.
Operating Income. Operating income decreased
$7.8 million to $6.1 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2009. The decrease in operating income
resulted primarily from the effect of the decreased revenues
discussed above. Operating income as a percentage of revenues
decreased from 8.3% to 5.2% during the three
37
months ended June 30, 2009, primarily due to lower revenues
that impacted the segments ability to cover its fixed
operating and administrative costs.
Dark
Fiber Segment
Revenues. Revenues from the Dark Fiber segment
increased from $13.5 million to $22.8 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2009. This increase in revenues
is primarily a result of our continued network expansion and the
associated revenues from licensing the right to use
point-to-point fiber-optic telecommunications facilities.
Operating Income. Operating income for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 increased
$3.7 million to $10.0 million due to the increased
revenues discussed above. Operating income as a percentage of
revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2009 decreased
from 46.7% to 43.7% primarily as a result of the timing of
various system maintenance costs.
Six
months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the six months ended
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Electric &
|
|
|
Telecom &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric &
|
|
|
Telecom &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Ancillary
|
|
|
Dark Fiber
|
|
|
Corporate &
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
|
|
|
Ancillary
|
|
|
Dark Fiber
|
|
|
Corporate &
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Revenues from unaffiliated customers by type of work:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric power services
|
|
$
|
998,559
|
|
|
$
|
21,631
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,020,190
|
|
|
$
|
951,168
|
|
|
$
|
20,611
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
971,779
|
|
Gas services
|
|
|
323,136
|
|
|
|
15,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
338,487
|
|
|
|
253,161
|
|
|
|
3,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256,563
|
|
Telecommunications and cable television network services
|
|
|
75,419
|
|
|
|
225,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,863
|
|
|
|
44,498
|
|
|
|
125,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,111
|
|
Ancillary services
|
|
|
55,039
|
|
|
|
64,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,112
|
|
|
|
51,755
|
|
|
|
60,027
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,782
|
|
Dark fiber services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from unaffiliated customers
|
|
$
|
1,452,153
|
|
|
$
|
326,499
|
|
|
$
|
26,672
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,805,324
|
|
|
$
|
1,300,582
|
|
|
$
|
209,653
|
|
|
$
|
41,674
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,551,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income
|
|
$
|
110,437
|
|
|
$
|
29,405
|
|
|
$
|
10,983
|
|
|
$
|
(35,732
|
)
|
|
$
|
115,093
|
|
|
$
|
114,655
|
|
|
$
|
4,081
|
|
|
$
|
17,837
|
|
|
$
|
(38,045
|
)
|
|
$
|
98,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric &
Gas Infrastructure Services Segment
Revenues. Revenues decreased
$151.6 million, or 10.4%, to $1.3 billion for the six
months ended June 30, 2009. Revenues from electric power
services decreased by approximately $47.4 million, or 4.7%,
revenues from gas services decreased by approximately
$70.0 million, or 21.7%, revenues from telecommunications
and cable television network services decreased by approximately
$30.9 million, or 41.0%, and revenues from ancillary
services decreased by approximately $3.3 million or 6.0%.
Overall, revenues were negatively impacted by decreases in the
number and size of projects as a result of reduced capital
spending by our customers. Partially offsetting the decrease in
electric power services was an increase in revenues from
emergency restoration services of approximately
$14.4 million from $45.6 million in the six months
ended June 30, 2008 to $60.0 million in the six months
ended June 30, 2009.
Operating Income. Operating income increased
$4.2 million to $114.7 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2009. Operating income as a percentage of
revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2009 increased
from 7.6% to 8.8%, primarily due to increased revenues from
emergency restoration services discussed above, which typically
generate higher margins, and the impact of the completion of
work under low margin ancillary service contracts in 2008 that
did not recur in 2009.
Telecom &
Ancillary Infrastructure Services Segment
Revenues. Revenues decreased
$116.8 million, or 35.8%, to $209.7 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2009. Of the total decrease,
$99.8 million relates to telecommunication services, which
decreased 44.3% from the
38
first six months of 2008 due to decreases in the number and size
of projects as a result of reduced capital spending by our
customers. The remaining decrease is associated with gas and
ancillary services, which were impacted by similar market
effects; however, these services represent a smaller portion of
this segments revenues.
Operating Income. Operating income decreased
$25.3 million to $4.1 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2009. The decrease in operating income resulted
primarily from the effect of the decreased revenues discussed
above. Operating income as a percentage of revenues decreased
from 9.0% to 1.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2009
primarily due to lower revenues that impacted the segments
ability to cover its fixed operating and administrative costs.
Dark
Fiber Segment
Revenues. Revenues from the Dark Fiber segment
increased from $26.7 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 to $41.7 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2009. This increase in revenues is primarily
a result of our continued network expansion and the associated
revenues from licensing the right to use point-to-point
fiber-optic telecommunications facilities.
Operating Income. Operating income for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 increased $6.9 million to
$17.8 million due to the increased revenues discussed
above. Operating income as a percentage of revenues for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 remained relatively constant.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Cash
Requirements
We anticipate that our cash and cash equivalents on hand, which
totaled $524.4 million as of June 30, 2009, existing
borrowing capacity under our credit facility, and our future
cash flows from operations will provide sufficient funds to
enable us to meet our future operating needs, debt service
requirements and planned capital expenditures, as well as
facilitate our ability to grow in the foreseeable future.
Management assesses our liquidity in terms of our ability to
generate cash to fund our operating, investing and financing
activities. Increased demand for services resulting from, for
example, initiatives to rebuild the United States electric power
grid or support renewable energy projects may require a
significant amount of additional working capital. We also
evaluate opportunities for strategic acquisitions from time to
time that may require cash.
Management continues to monitor the financial markets and
general national and global economic conditions. If further
changes in financial markets or other areas of the economy
adversely impacted our ability to access capital markets, we
would expect to rely on a combination of available cash and
borrowing capacity under our credit facility to provide
short-term funding. We consider our cash investment policies to
be conservative in that we maintain a diverse portfolio of what
we believe to be high-quality cash investments with short-term
maturities. We were in compliance with our covenants under our
credit facility at June 30, 2009. Accordingly, we do not
anticipate that the volatility in the capital markets will have
a material impact on the principal amounts of our cash
investments or our ability to rely upon our existing credit
facility for funds. To date, we have experienced no loss or lack
of access to our invested cash or cash equivalents; however, we
can provide no assurances that access to our invested cash and
cash equivalents will not be impacted in the future by adverse
conditions in the financial markets.
Capital expenditures are expected to be approximately
$175 million for 2009. Approximately $85 million of
expected 2009 capital expenditures are targeted for the
expansion of our dark fiber network, primarily in connection
with committed customer arrangements, with the majority of the
remaining expenditures for operating equipment in the
Electric & Gas Infrastructure Services and Telecom
& Ancillary Infrastructure Services segments.
Our 3.75% convertible subordinated notes due 2026
(3.75% Notes) are not presently convertible into our common
stock, although they have been convertible in certain prior
quarters as a result of the satisfaction of the market price
condition described in further detail in Debt
Instruments 3.75% Convertible Subordinated
Notes below. The 3.75% Notes could become
convertible in future periods upon the satisfaction of the
market price condition or other conditions. If any holder of the
convertible notes requests to convert their notes, we have the
option to deliver cash, shares of our common stock or a
combination thereof, with the amount of cash determined in
accordance with the terms of the indenture under which the notes
were issued.
39
Sources
and Uses of Cash
As of June 30, 2009, we had cash and cash equivalents of
$524.4 million, working capital of $955.2 million and
long-term obligations of $124.4 million, net of current
maturities. The long-term obligations are our 3.75% Notes,
which have an aggregate principal amount of $143.8 million.
We also had $158.0 million of letters of credit outstanding
under our credit facility, leaving $317.0 million available
for revolving loans or issuing new letters of credit.
Operating
Activities
Cash flow from operations is primarily influenced by demand for
our services, operating margins and the type of services we
provide but can also be influenced by working capital needs such
as the timing of collection of receivables and the settlement of
payables and other obligations. Working capital needs are
generally higher during the summer and fall months due to
increased services in weather affected regions of the country.
Conversely, working capital assets are typically converted to
cash during the winter months. Operating activities provided net
cash to us of $59.4 million during the three months ended
June 30, 2009 as compared to $18.1 million in the
three months ended June 30, 2008. Operating activities
provided net cash to us of $170.6 million during the six
months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to
$33.3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2008.
The increase in operating cash flows in the first six months of
2009 as compared to the first six months of 2008 is primarily
due to collections of accounts receivable and retainage that
were outstanding at December 31, 2008, coupled with reduced
overall working capital needs in the first six months of 2009
associated with lower levels of revenue activity. Cash flow for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 was negatively
impacted by higher working capital requirements associated with
invoice processing issues by a certain customer as a result of
the rapid
ramp-up of
FTTx and wireless installations over the nine months prior to
June 30, 2008. The specific telecommunications work that
was being performed had voluminous billing requirements and had
been subject to lengthy delays as our invoices worked their way
through the customers payment system. By the fourth
quarter of 2008, these collection delays had been resolved.
Investing
Activities
In the three months ended June 30, 2009, we used net cash
in investing activities of $42.7 million as compared to
$90.4 million used in investing activities in the three
months ended June 30, 2008. Investing activities in the
second quarter of 2009 included $43.6 million used for
capital expenditures, partially offset by $1.0 million of
proceeds from the sale of equipment. Investing activities in the
second quarter of 2008 included $60.0 million used for
capital expenditures, $22.7 million in net cash outlays for
acquisitions and $14.6 million paid to secure patents and
developed technology, partially offset by $6.9 million of
proceeds from the sale of equipment.
In the six months ended June 30, 2009, we used net cash in
investing activities of $82.1 million as compared to
$141.6 million used in investing activities in the six
months ended June 30, 2008. Investing activities in the six
months ended June 30, 2009 included $84.8 million used
for capital expenditures, partially offset by $2.7 million
of proceeds from the sale of equipment. Investing activities in
the six months ended June 30, 2008 included
$113.1 million used for capital expenditures,
$22.9 million in net cash outlays for acquisitions and
$14.6 million paid to secure patents and developed
technology, partially offset by $9.1 million of proceeds
from the sale of equipment.
Financing
Activities
In the three months ended June 30, 2009, financing
activities used net cash flow of $2.0 million as compared
to $4.7 million provided by financing activities in the
three months ended June 30, 2008. The $2.0 million
used in financing activities in the three months ended
June 30, 2009 resulted primarily from $2.0 million in
net repayments of borrowings. The $4.7 million provided by
financing activities in the three months ended June 30,
2008 resulted primarily from $4.2 million received from the
exercise of stock options. Also contributing to the inflow was
$1.1 million of tax benefit from stock-based equity awards,
slightly offset by $0.7 million of payments on other
long-term debt.
In the six months ended June 30, 2009, financing activities
used net cash flow of $2.7 million as compared to
$7.0 million provided by financing activities in the six
months ended June 30, 2008. The $2.7 million used in
40
financing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2009
resulted primarily from a $1.7 million tax impact from
stock-based equity awards combined with $1.2 million in net
repayments of borrowings. The $7.0 million provided by
financing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2008
resulted primarily from $5.6 million received from the
exercise of stock options. Also contributing to the inflow was
$2.3 million of tax benefit from stock-based equity awards,
slightly offset by $1.0 million of payments on other
long-term debt, net of proceeds.
Debt
Instruments
Credit
Facility
We have a credit facility with various lenders that provides for
a $475.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility
maturing on September 19, 2012. Subject to the conditions
specified in the credit facility, borrowings under the credit
facility are to be used for working capital, capital
expenditures and other general corporate purposes. The entire
unused portion of the credit facility is available for the
issuance of letters of credit.
As of June 30, 2009, we had approximately
$158.0 million of letters of credit issued under the credit
facility and no outstanding revolving loans. The remaining
$317.0 million was available for revolving loans or issuing
new letters of credit. Amounts borrowed under the credit
facility bear interest, at our option, at a rate equal to either
(a) the Eurodollar Rate (as defined in the credit facility)
plus 0.875% to 1.75%, as determined by the ratio of our total
funded debt to consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the credit
facility), or (b) the base rate (as described below) plus
0.00% to 0.75%, as determined by the ratio of our total funded
debt to consolidated EBITDA. Letters of credit issued under the
credit facility are subject to a letter of credit fee of 0.875%
to 1.75%, based on the ratio of our total funded debt to
consolidated EBITDA. We are also subject to a commitment fee of
0.15% to 0.35%, based on the ratio of our total funded debt to
consolidated EBITDA, on any unused availability under the credit
facility. The base rate equals the higher of (i) the
Federal Funds Rate (as defined in the credit facility) plus
1/2
of 1% or (ii) the banks prime rate.
The credit facility contains certain covenants, including
covenants with respect to maximum funded debt to consolidated
EBITDA, maximum senior debt to consolidated EBITDA and minimum
interest coverage, in each case as specified in the credit
facility. For purposes of calculating the maximum funded debt to
consolidated EBITDA ratio and the maximum senior debt to
consolidated EBITDA ratio, our maximum funded debt and maximum
senior debt are reduced by all cash and cash equivalents (as
defined in the credit facility) held by us in excess of
$25.0 million. As of June 30, 2009, we were in
compliance with all of its covenants. The credit facility limits
certain acquisitions, mergers and consolidations, capital
expenditures, asset sales and prepayments of indebtedness and,
subject to certain exceptions, prohibits liens on material
assets. The credit facility also limits the payment of dividends
and stock repurchase programs in any fiscal year except those
payments or other distributions payable solely in capital stock.
The credit facility provides for customary events of default and
carries cross-default provisions with all of our existing
subordinated notes, our continuing indemnity and security
agreement with our sureties and all of our other debt
instruments exceeding $15.0 million in borrowings. If an
event of default (as defined in the credit facility) occurs and
is continuing, on the terms and subject to the conditions set
forth in the credit facility, amounts outstanding under the
credit facility may be accelerated and may become or be declared
immediately due and payable.
The credit facility is secured by a pledge of all of the capital
stock of our U.S. subsidiaries, 65% of the capital stock of
our foreign subsidiaries and substantially all of our assets.
Our U.S. subsidiaries guarantee the repayment of all
amounts due under the credit facility. Our obligations under the
credit facility constitute designated senior indebtedness under
our 3.75% Notes.
3.75% Convertible
Subordinated Notes
At June 30, 2009, we had outstanding $143.8 million
aggregate principal amount of the 3.75% Notes. The resale
of the notes and the shares issuable upon conversion thereof was
registered for the benefit of the holders in a shelf
registration statement filed with the SEC. The 3.75% Notes
mature on April 30, 2026 and bear interest at the annual
rate of 3.75%, payable semi-annually on April 30 and
October 30, until maturity.
The $122.3 million and $124.4 million of convertible
subordinated notes on the consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009 is presented net
of a debt discount of $21.5 million and $19.4 million,
41
which is amortized as interest expense over the remaining
amortization period. This debt discount was recorded in
accordance with the January 1, 2009 adoption of FSP APB
14-1 as
discussed in Notes 1 and 3 to the condensed consolidated
financial statements. The effective interest rate used to
calculate total interest expense for the 3.75% Notes under
FSP APB 14-1
was 7.85%. At June 30, 2009, the remaining amortization
period for the debt discount, which continues until the first
repurchase right on April 30, 2013, is approximately
3.8 years.
The 3.75% Notes are convertible into our common stock,
based on an initial conversion rate of 44.6229 shares of
our common stock per $1,000 principal amount of 3.75% Notes
(which is equal to an initial conversion price of approximately
$22.41 per share), subject to adjustment as a result of certain
events. The 3.75% Notes are convertible by the holder
(i) during any fiscal quarter if the closing price of our
common stock is greater than 130% of the conversion price for at
least 20 trading days in the period of 30 consecutive trading
days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding
fiscal quarter, (ii) upon us calling the 3.75% Notes
for redemption, (iii) upon the occurrence of specified
distributions to holders of our common stock or specified
corporate transactions or (iv) at any time on or after
March 1, 2026 until the business day immediately preceding
the maturity date of the 3.75% Notes. The 3.75% Notes
are not presently convertible, although they have been
convertible in certain prior quarters as a result of the
satisfaction of the market price condition in clause (i)
above. If the 3.75% Notes become convertible under any of
these circumstances, we have the option to deliver cash, shares
of our common stock or a combination thereof, with the amount of
cash determined in accordance with the terms of the indenture
under which the notes were issued. Conversions that may occur in
the future could result in the recording of losses on
extinguishment of debt if the conversions are settled in cash
for an amount in excess of the principal amount. The holders of
the 3.75% Notes who convert their notes in connection with
certain change in control transactions, as defined in the
indenture, may be entitled to a make whole premium in the form
of an increase in the conversion rate. In the event of a change
in control, in lieu of paying holders a make whole premium, if
applicable, we may elect, in some circumstances, to adjust the
conversion rate and related conversion obligations so that the
3.75% Notes are convertible into shares of the acquiring or
surviving company.
Beginning on April 30, 2010 until April 30, 2013, we
may redeem for cash all or part of the 3.75% Notes at a
price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and
unpaid interest, if the closing price of our common stock is
equal to or greater than 130% of the conversion price then in
effect for the 3.75% Notes for at least 20 trading days in
the 30 consecutive trading day period ending on the trading day
immediately prior to the date of mailing of the notice of
redemption. In addition, we may redeem for cash all or part of
the 3.75% Notes at any time on or after April 30, 2010
at certain redemption prices, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
Beginning with the six-month interest period commencing on
April 30, 2010, and for each six-month interest period
thereafter, we will be required to pay contingent interest on
any outstanding 3.75% Notes during the applicable interest
period if the average trading price of the 3.75% Notes
reaches a specified threshold. The contingent interest payable
within any applicable interest period will equal an annual rate
of 0.25% of the average trading price of the 3.75% Notes
during a five trading day reference period.
The holders of the 3.75% Notes may require us to repurchase
all or a part of the notes in cash on each of April 30,
2013, April 30, 2016 and April 30, 2021, and in the
event of a change in control of the company, as defined in the
indenture, at a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal
amount of the 3.75% Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest.
The 3.75% Notes carry cross-default provisions with our
other debt instruments exceeding $20.0 million in
borrowings, which includes our existing credit facility.
4.5% Convertible
Subordinated Notes
During 2008, the holders of $269.8 million aggregate
principal amount of 4.5% convertible subordinated notes due 2023
(4.5% Notes) elected to convert their notes, resulting in
the issuance of 24,229,781 shares of our common stock,
substantially all of which followed a notice of redemption that
we would redeem on October 8, 2008 all of the
4.5% Notes outstanding pursuant to the indenture governing
the notes. We also repurchased $106,000 aggregate principal
amount of the 4.5% Notes on October 1, 2008 pursuant
to the holders election and redeemed for cash $49,000
aggregate principal amount of the notes, plus accrued and unpaid
interest, on October 8, 2008. As a result of all of these
transactions, none of the 4.5% Notes remained outstanding
as of October 8, 2008. The 4.5% Notes were originally
issued in October 2003 for an aggregate principal amount of
$270.0 million and required semi-annual interest payments
on April 1 and October 1 until maturity.
42
Off-Balance
Sheet Transactions
As is common in our industry, we have entered into certain
off-balance sheet arrangements in the ordinary course of
business that result in risks not directly reflected in our
balance sheets. Our significant off-balance sheet transactions
include liabilities associated with non-cancelable operating
leases, letter of credit obligations, commitments to expand our
dark fiber networks, surety guarantees and obligations relating
to our joint venture arrangements. During the first quarter of
2009, two of our subsidiaries began operating in separate joint
venture structures which contain risks not directly reflected in
our balance sheets. In association with one of these joint
ventures, our subsidiary has guaranteed all of the obligations
of the joint venture under the contract with the customer.
Additionally, our second joint venture arrangement qualifies as
a general partnership, for which we are jointly and severally
liable for all of the obligations of the joint venture. In each
of these joint venture arrangements, each joint venturer has
indemnified the other party for any liabilities incurred in
excess of the liabilities for which the joint venturer is
obligated to bear under the respective joint venture agreement.
Other than as previously discussed, we have not engaged in any
off-balance sheet financing arrangements through special purpose
entities, and we have no other material guarantees of the work
or obligations of third parties.
Leases
We enter into non-cancelable operating leases for many of our
facility, vehicle and equipment needs. These leases allow us to
conserve cash by paying a monthly lease rental fee for use of
facilities, vehicles and equipment rather than purchasing them.
We may decide to cancel or terminate a lease before the end of
its term, in which case we are typically liable to the lessor
for the remaining lease payments under the term of the lease.
We have guaranteed the residual value of the underlying assets
under certain of our equipment operating leases at the date of
termination of such leases. We have agreed to pay any difference
between this residual value and the fair market value of each
underlying asset as of the lease termination date. As of
June 30, 2009, the maximum guaranteed residual value was
approximately $147.3 million. We believe that no
significant payments will be made as a result of the difference
between the fair market value of the leased equipment and the
guaranteed residual value. However, there can be no assurance
that future significant payments will not be required.
Letters
of Credit
Certain of our vendors require letters of credit to ensure
reimbursement for amounts they are disbursing on our behalf,
such as to beneficiaries under our self-funded insurance
programs. In addition, from time to time some customers require
us to post letters of credit to ensure payment to our
subcontractors and vendors under those contracts and to
guarantee performance under our contracts. Such letters of
credit are generally issued by a bank or similar financial
institution. The letter of credit commits the issuer to pay
specified amounts to the holder of the letter of credit if the
holder demonstrates that we have failed to perform specified
actions. If this were to occur, we would be required to
reimburse the issuer of the letter of credit. Depending on the
circumstances of such a reimbursement, we may also have to
record a charge to earnings for the reimbursement. We do not
believe that it is likely that any claims will be made under a
letter of credit in the foreseeable future.
As of June 30, 2009, we had $158.0 million in letters
of credit outstanding under our credit facility primarily to
secure obligations under our casualty insurance program. These
are irrevocable stand-by letters of credit with maturities
generally expiring at various times throughout 2009 and 2010.
Upon maturity, it is expected that the majority of these letters
of credit will be renewed for subsequent one-year periods.
Performance
Bonds and Parent Guarantees
Many customers, particularly in connection with new
construction, require us to post performance and payment bonds
issued by a financial institution known as a surety. These bonds
provide a guarantee to the customer that we will perform under
the terms of a contract and that we will pay subcontractors and
vendors. If we fail to perform under a contract or to pay
subcontractors and vendors, the customer may demand that the
surety make payments or provide services under the bond. We must
reimburse the surety for any expenses or outlays it incurs.
Under our continuing indemnity and security agreement with our
sureties and with the consent of our lenders under our credit
facility, we have granted security interests in certain of our
assets to collateralize our obligations to the
43
sureties. In addition, under our agreement with the surety that
issued bonds on behalf of InfraSource, which remains in place
for any bonds that were outstanding under it on August 30,
2007 and have not expired or been replaced, we will be required
to transfer to the surety certain of our assets as collateral in
the event of a default under the agreement. We may be required
to post letters of credit or other collateral in favor of the
sureties or our customers in the future. Posting letters of
credit in favor of the sureties or our customers would reduce
the borrowing availability under our credit facility. To date,
we have not been required to make any reimbursements to our
sureties for bond-related costs. We believe that it is unlikely
that we will have to fund significant claims under our surety
arrangements in the foreseeable future. As of June 30,
2009, the total amount of outstanding performance bonds was
approximately $908.6 million, and the estimated cost to
complete these bonded projects was approximately
$228.1 million.
From time to time, we guarantee the obligations of our wholly
owned subsidiaries, including obligations under certain
contracts with customers, certain lease obligations and, in some
states, obligations in connection with obtaining
contractors licenses. We have also guaranteed the
obligations of our wholly owned subsidiary under the joint
venture arrangement with a third party engineering company
entered into in the first quarter of 2009, which is described in
Notes 2 and 10 to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
Contractual
Obligations
As of June 30, 2009, our future contractual obligations are
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
of 2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Long-term obligations principal
|
|
$
|
143,752
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
143,750
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Long-term obligations interest
|
|
|
20,663
|
|
|
|
2,695
|
|
|
|
5,391
|
|
|
|
5,391
|
|
|
|
5,391
|
|
|
|
1,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
156,807
|
|
|
|
29,195
|
|
|
|
41,615
|
|
|
|
31,757
|
|
|
|
21,317
|
|
|
|
15,959
|
|
|
|
16,964
|
|
Committed capital expenditures for dark fiber networks under
contracts with customers
|
|
|
29,854
|
|
|
|
27,832
|
|
|
|
1,993
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
351,076
|
|
|
$
|
59,724
|
|
|
$
|
48,999
|
|
|
$
|
37,177
|
|
|
$
|
26,708
|
|
|
$
|
161,504
|
|
|
$
|
16,964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual maturities of our long-term obligations may differ from
contractual maturities because convertible note holders may
convert their notes prior to the maturity dates or subsequent to
optional maturity dates. Additionally, the $143.8 million
aggregate principal amount above differs from the
$124.4 million of convertible subordinated notes on the
consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2009 due to the
balance sheet amount being presented net of a discount of
$19.4 million.
The committed capital expenditures for dark fiber networks
represent commitments related to signed contracts with
customers. The amounts are estimates of costs required to build
the networks under contract. The actual capital expenditures
related to building the networks could vary materially from
these estimates.
As of June 30, 2009, the total unrecognized tax benefit
related to uncertain tax positions was $65.0 million. We
estimate that none of this will be paid within the next twelve
months. However, we believe that it is reasonably possible that
within the next 12 months unrecognized tax benefits may
decrease up to $25.0 million due to the expiration of
certain statutes of limitations. We are unable to make
reasonably reliable estimates regarding the timing of future
cash outflows, if any, associated with the remaining
unrecognized tax benefits.
Our multi-employer pension plan contributions are determined
annually based on our union employee payrolls, which cannot be
determined in advance for future periods. We may also be
required to make additional contributions to our multi-employer
pension plans if they become underfunded.
Self-Insurance
We are insured for employers liability, general liability,
auto liability and workers compensation claims. Through
July 31, 2009, employers liability claims were
subject to a deductible of $1.0 million per occurrence,
general liability and auto liability claims were subject to a
deductible of $3.0 million per occurrence, and
workers
44
compensation claims were subject to a deductible of
$2.0 million per occurrence. Additionally, through
July 31, 2009, our workers compensation claims were
subject to an annual cumulative aggregate liability of up to
$1.0 million on claims in excess of $2.0 million per
occurrence. As of August 1, 2009, we renewed our
employers liability, general liability, auto liability and
workers compensation policies for the 2009 to 2010 policy
year. As a result of the renewal, the deductibles for all
policies have increased to $5.0 million per occurrence.
Additionally, in connection with this renewal, the amount of
letters of credit required to secure our obligations under our
casualty insurance program, which is discussed above, has
increased. We also have employee health care benefit plans for
most employees not subject to collective bargaining agreements,
of which the primary plan is subject to a deductible of $350,000
per claimant per year.
Losses under all of these insurance programs are accrued based
upon our estimate of the ultimate liability for claims reported
and an estimate of claims incurred but not reported, with
assistance from third-party actuaries. These insurance
liabilities are difficult to assess and estimate due to unknown
factors, including the severity of an injury, the determination
of our liability in proportion to other parties, the number of
incidents not reported and the effectiveness of our safety
program. The accruals are based upon known facts and historical
trends and management believes such accruals to be adequate. As
of December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009, the gross
amount accrued for insurance claims totaled $147.9 million
and $145.2 million, with $105.0 million and
$103.1 million considered to be long-term and included in
other non-current liabilities. Related insurance
recoveries/receivables as of December 31, 2008 and
June 30, 2009 were $12.5 million and
$12.1 million, of which $7.2 million and
$5.8 million are included in prepaid expenses and other
current assets and $5.3 million and $6.3 million are
included in other assets, net.
Concentration
of Credit Risk
We are subject to concentrations of credit risk related
primarily to our cash and cash equivalents and accounts
receivable. Substantially all of our cash investments are
managed by what we believe to be high credit quality financial
institutions. In accordance with our investment policies, these
institutions are authorized to invest this cash in a diversified
portfolio of what we believe to be high quality investments,
which primarily include interest-bearing demand deposits, money
market mutual funds and investment grade commercial paper with
original maturities of three months or less. Although we do not
currently believe the principal amount of these investments is
subject to any material risk of loss, the recent volatility in
the financial markets is likely to continue to significantly
impact the interest income we receive from these investments. In
addition, we grant credit under normal payment terms, generally
without collateral, to our customers, which include electric
power and gas companies, telecommunications and cable television
system operators, governmental entities, general contractors,
and builders, owners and managers of commercial and industrial
properties located primarily in the United States. Consequently,
we are subject to potential credit risk related to changes in
business and economic factors throughout the United States,
which may be heightened as a result of the current financial
crisis and volatility of the markets. However, we generally have
certain statutory lien rights with respect to services provided.
Under certain circumstances, such as foreclosures or negotiated
settlements, we may take title to the underlying assets in lieu
of cash in settlement of receivables. In such circumstances,
extended time frames may be required to liquidate these assets,
causing the amounts realized to differ from the value of the
assumed receivable. Historically, some of our customers have
experienced significant financial difficulties, and others may
experience financial difficulties in the future. These
difficulties expose us to increased risk related to
collectability of receivables for services we have performed.
One customer accounted for approximately 11% of consolidated
revenues during the three months ended June 30, 2009.
Revenues from this customer are included in the Electric &
Gas Infrastructure Services segment. No other customer
represented 10% or more of revenues during the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008 or the six months ended
June 30, 2009. None of Quantas customers accounted
for 10% or more of accounts receivable as of June 30, 2009.
Litigation
We are from time to time party to various lawsuits, claims and
other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of
business. These actions typically seek, among other things,
compensation for alleged personal injury,
45
breach of contract
and/or
property damages, punitive damages, civil penalties or other
losses, or injunctive or declaratory relief. With respect to all
such lawsuits, claims and proceedings, we record reserves when
it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount
of loss can be reasonably estimated. We do not believe that any
of these proceedings, separately or in the aggregate, would be
expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
Related
Party Transactions
In the normal course of business, we enter into transactions
from time to time with related parties. These transactions
typically take the form of facility leases with prior owners of
certain acquired companies and payables to prior owners who are
now employees.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements. On
January 1, 2009, we adopted FSP APB
14-1, which
requires issuers of such instruments to separately account for
the liability and equity components of qualifying convertible
debt instruments in a manner that adjusts the recorded value of
the convertible debt to reflect the entitys
non-convertible debt borrowing rate and interest cost at the
time of issuance. The value of the debt instrument is adjusted
through a discount to the face value of the debt, which is
amortized as non-cash interest expense over the expected life of
the debt, with an offsetting adjustment to equity to separately
recognize the value of the debt instruments conversion
feature. This FSP has been applied retrospectively to all
periods presented. Accordingly, we recorded a cumulative effect
of the change in accounting principle to accumulated deficit as
of January 1, 2007 of approximately $29.6 million.
Also included in accumulated deficit is the impact from non-cash
interest expense recorded in the amounts of approximately
$18.3 million ($11.8 million after tax effect) and
$14.9 million ($9.6 million after tax effect) for the
years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008. In addition, we
recorded non-cash interest expense during the first and second
quarters of 2009 and will continue doing so until our 3.75%
convertible subordinated notes are redeemable at the
holders option in April 2013. Approximately
$4.3 million ($2.8 million after tax effect) non-cash
interest expense will be recorded in 2009, with approximately
$1.1 million ($0.7 million after tax effect) recorded
in each the first and second quarters of 2009. See the tables in
Note 3 of our consolidated financial statements for the
impact of FSP APB
14-1 as of
December 31, 2008 and for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008.
On January 1, 2009, we adopted FSP
EITF 03-6-1,
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based
Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities. FSP
EITF 03-6-1 states
that unvested share-based payment awards that contain
non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents
(whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and should
be included in the computation of both basic and diluted
earnings per share. All prior period earnings per share data
presented have been adjusted retrospectively to conform to the
provisions of FSP
EITF 03-6-1.
All of our restricted stock grants have non-forfeitable rights
to dividends and are considered participating securities under
FSP
EITF 03-6-1.
Prior to the retrospective application of FSP
EITF 03-6-1
on January 1, 2009, unvested restricted stock grants were
included in the calculation of weighted average dilutive shares
outstanding using the treasury stock method. Under this previous
method, unvested restricted common shares were not included in
the calculation of weighted average basic shares outstanding and
were included in the calculation of weighted average diluted
shares outstanding to the extent the grant price was less than
the average share price for the respective period. The impact of
the retrospective application of FSP
EITF 03-6-1
on earnings per share for prior periods is immaterial.
Additionally, the adoption of FSP
EITF 03-6-1
had no material impact on basic and diluted income per share in
the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. See
Note 3 of our consolidated financial statements for the
impact of adopting FSP
EITF 03-6-1
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 141(R)-1,
Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in
a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies. FSP
FAS 141(R)-1 amends the provisions related to the initial
recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and
disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies
in a business combination under SFAS No. 141(R) and
has the same effective date as SFAS No. 141(R).
Accordingly, we adopted FSP FAS 141(R)-1 effective
January 1, 2009. FSP FAS 141(R)-1 carries forward the
requirements in SFAS No. 141, Business
Combinations for acquired contingencies, which requires
that such contingencies be recognized at fair value on the
acquisition date if fair value can be reasonably estimated
during the measurement period. Otherwise, companies should
typically account for the acquired
46
contingencies in accordance with SFAS No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencies. FSP FAS 141(R)-1
also amends the disclosure requirements of
SFAS No. 141(R) to require separate disclosure of
recognized and unrecognized contingencies if certain conditions
are met. As we did not complete any acquisitions in the first
six months of 2009, FSP FAS 141(R)-1 had no impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations, cash
flows or disclosures in the first six months of 2009, but we
expect that it may have a material impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations, cash flows or
disclosures as a result of acquisitions in future periods.
On January 1, 2009, we fully adopted
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements.
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes methods
used to measure fair value and expands disclosure requirements
about fair value measurements with respect to financial and
non-financial assets and liabilities. The adoption of
SFAS No. 157 did not have a material impact on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations, cash
flows or disclosures. In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP
FAS 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of
Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased
and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly. FSP
FAS 157-4
provides additional guidance for estimating fair value when an
entity determines that either the volume
and/or level
of activity for an asset or liability has significantly
decreased. This FSP also provides guidance to identify
circumstances that indicate when a transaction is not orderly.
FSP
FAS 157-4
is effective for interim and annual periods ending after
June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted in certain
circumstances for periods ending after March 15, 2009. We
adopted FSP
FAS 157-4
in the quarter ended March 31, 2009. The adoption of FSP
FAS 157-4
did not have any material impact on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations, cash flows or disclosures.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we adopted FSP
FAS 107-1
and APB
28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments. FSP
FAS 107-1
requires public entities to provide the disclosures required by
SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments on a quarterly basis and is
effective for interim and annual periods ending after
June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted in certain
circumstances for periods ending after March 15, 2009.
Because we have been providing these disclosures in our
quarterly reports prior to the issuance of FSP
FAS 107-1,
the adoption of FSP
FAS 107-1
did not have any material impact on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations, cash flows or disclosures.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we adopted FSP
FAS 115-2
and
FAS 124-2,
Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments. FSP
FAS 115-2
establishes a new method of recognizing and reporting
other-than-temporary
impairments of debt securities. The FSP also contains additional
disclosure requirements related to debt and equity securities.
FSP
FAS 115-2
is effective for interim and annual periods ending after
June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted in certain
circumstances for periods ending after March 15, 2009.
Because we have not held any debt or equity securities that
would be within the scope of FSP
FAS 115-2
since its adoption, the adoption of FSP
FAS 115-2
did not have any material impact on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations, cash flows or disclosures.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, we adopted
SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events. Although
SFAS No. 165 should not result in significant changes
in the subsequent events an entity reports, it requires enhanced
disclosures related to subsequent events including the date
through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events.
SFAS No. 165 is effective for interim and annual
financial statements ending after June 15, 2009 and must be
applied prospectively. In accordance with
SFAS No. 165, we have evaluated subsequent events
through the date of issuance of these condensed consolidated
financial statements, which is August 10, 2009. The
adoption of SFAS No. 165 had no material impact on our
condensed consolidated financial position, results of
operations, cash flows or disclosures in the quarter ended
June 30, 2009, but it may have a material impact on our
disclosures in the future if subsequent events occur that
require disclosure.
On July 1, 2009, we adopted SFAS No. 168,
The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles a replacement of FASB Statement
No. 162. SFAS No. 168 establishes the FASB
Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) as the source
of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to
be used by non-governmental entities in the preparation of
financial statements presented in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP).
Rules and interpretations of the SEC under the authority of
federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP
for SEC registrants such as us. On July 1, 2009, the
Codification reorganized the pre-Codification GAAP into
approximately 90 accounting topics and superseded all
then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting
47
standards. All accounting literature not included in the
Codification became non-authoritative. All of the
Codifications content carries the same level of authority,
which effectively superseded SFAS No. 162.
SFAS No. 168 is effective for financial statements for
interim or annual periods ending after September 15, 2009.
Accordingly, it is effective for us for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009, and we have therefore adopted
SFAS No. 168 on the first day of the third quarter of
2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 168 is not anticipated
to have a material impact on our consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows but will result in
a change to the references to accounting principles in our notes
to the consolidated financial statements in the quarter ended
September 30, 2009.
Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted. In June
2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting
for Transfers of Financial Assets an amendment of
FASB Statement No. 140 and SFAS No. 167,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an amendment
to FIN 46(R). Together these new standards aim to
improve the visibility of off-balance sheet vehicles currently
exempt from consolidation and address practice issues involving
the accounting for transfers of financial assets as sales or
secured borrowings. These new standards are effective as of the
beginning of an entitys fiscal year beginning after
November 15, 2009, and for interim periods within that
first year, with earlier adoption prohibited. Accordingly, we
will adopt SFAS Nos. 166 and 167 on January 1, 2010.
We have not yet determined the impact, if any, SFAS Nos.
166 and 167 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Except as provided in the New Accounting
Pronouncements section above and the enhanced
disclosures regarding goodwill below, as of the date of this
filing, there have been no material changes in our critical
accounting policies disclosed in Item 7 to Part I of
our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 (2008 Annual Report).
Due to the current recessionary environment, we have enhanced
our disclosures related to valuation of goodwill from what was
included in our 2008 Annual Report under Critical Accounting
Policies Valuation of Intangibles and Long-Lived
Assets.
Valuation of goodwill. We have recorded
goodwill in connection with various of our acquisitions.
Goodwill is subject to an annual assessment for impairment using
a two-step fair value-based test, which we perform at the
reporting unit level. We have determined that, based on our cash
flow structure and organizational structure, our individual
operating units represent our reporting units for the purpose of
assessing goodwill impairments. This assessment is performed
annually at year-end, or more frequently if events or
circumstances exist which indicate that goodwill may be
impaired. For instance, a decrease in our market capitalization
below book value, a significant change in business climate or a
loss of a significant customer, among other things, may trigger
the need for interim impairment testing of goodwill associated
with one or all of our reporting units. The change in our
reportable segments during the quarter ended June 30, 2009
did not have any impact on our operating unit structure or the
methods to be used in assessing goodwill for impairment in the
future. The first step of the two-step fair value-based test
involves comparing the fair value of each of our reporting units
with its carrying value, including goodwill. If the carrying
value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second
step is performed. The second step compares the carrying amount
of the reporting units goodwill to the implied fair value
of the goodwill. If the implied fair value of goodwill is less
than the carrying amount, an impairment loss would be recorded
as a reduction to goodwill with a corresponding charge to
operating expense.
We determine the fair value of our reporting units using a
weighted combination of the discounted cash flow, market
multiple and market capitalization valuation approaches, with
heavier weighting on the discounted cash flow method, as in
managements opinion, this method currently results in the
most accurate calculation of a reporting units fair value.
Determining the fair value of a reporting unit requires judgment
and the use of significant estimates and assumptions. Such
estimates and assumptions include revenue growth rates,
operating margins, discount rates, weighted average costs of
capital and future market conditions, among others. We believe
that the estimates and assumptions used in our impairment
assessments are reasonable and based on available market
information, but variations in any of the assumptions could
result in materially different calculations of fair value and
determinations of whether or not an impairment is indicated.
48
Under the discounted cash flow method, we determine fair value
based on the estimated future cash flows of each reporting unit,
discounted to present value using risk-adjusted industry
discount rates, which reflects the overall level of inherent
risk of a reporting unit and the rate of return an outside
investor would expect to earn. Year one cash flows are derived
from budgeted amounts and operating forecasts, both of which are
evaluated by management. Subsequent period cash flows are
developed for each reporting unit using growth rates that
management believes are reasonably likely to occur along with a
terminal value derived from the reporting units earnings
before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA).
The EBITDA multiples for each reporting unit are based on
trailing twelve-month comparable industry data.
Under the market multiple and market capitalization approaches,
we determine the estimated fair value of each of our reporting
units by applying EBITDA multiples to each reporting units
projected EBITDA and then averaging that estimate with similar
historical calculations using either a one year or a two year
average. For the market capitalization approach, we add a
reasonable control premium, which is estimated as the premium
that would be received in a sale of the reporting unit in an
orderly transaction between market participants.
The projected cash flows and estimated levels of EBITDA by
reporting unit were used to determine fair value under the three
approaches discussed herein. The following table presents the
significant estimates used by management in determining the fair
values of our reporting units at December 31, 2007 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric & Gas
|
|
Telecom & Ancillary
|
|
Dark Fiber
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
Segment
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
Years of cash flows before terminal value
|
|
5
|
|
5
|
|
5
|
|
5
|
|
N/A
|
|
15
|
Discount rates
|
|
14%
|
|
14% to 15%
|
|
15% to 17%
|
|
15% to 17%
|
|
N/A
|
|
15%
|
EBITDA multiples
|
|
7.0 to 9.0
|
|
6.0 to 8.0
|
|
6.0 to 8.0
|
|
5.0 to 6.0
|
|
N/A
|
|
10.0
|
Weighting of three approaches:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discounted cash flows
|
|
60%
|
|
70%
|
|
60%
|
|
70%
|
|
N/A
|
|
90%
|
Market multiple
|
|
20%
|
|
15%
|
|
20%
|
|
15%
|
|
N/A
|
|
5%
|
Market capitalization
|
|
20%
|
|
15%
|
|
20%
|
|
15%
|
|
N/A
|
|
5%
|
At December 31, 2007, we did not perform a separate
goodwill impairment analysis for the reporting unit that
comprises the Dark Fiber segment as we had recently acquired
this reporting unit on August 30, 2007 in connection with
our acquisition of InfraSource Services, Inc., and goodwill
associated with that transaction was assessed in the aggregate.
The 15-year
discounted cash flow model used for the Dark Fiber segment in
2008 was based on the long-term nature of the underlying fiber
network licensing agreements.
We assigned a higher weighting to the discounted cash flow
approach at both December 31, 2007 and 2008 to reflect
increased expectations of market value being determined from a
held and used model. At December 31, 2008, we
increased the weighting for the discounted cash flow approach as
compared to December 31, 2007 due to the volatility of the
capital markets at the end of 2008 and the impact such
volatility may have had on the accuracy of the market multiple
and market capitalization approaches. Also at December 31,
2008, we increased discount rates and decreased EBITDA multiples
at reporting units to reflect potential declines in market
conditions.
As stated previously, year one cash flows are derived from
budgeted amounts and operating forecasts, both of which were
evaluated by management. For 2009, projected growth rates by
reporting unit varied widely. Projected annual growth rates
ranged from 2% to 10% thereafter for the Electric & Gas
Infrastructure Services segment, 2% to 10% thereafter for the
Telecom & Ancillary Infrastructure Services segment
and 10% to 50% thereafter for the Dark Fiber segment.
Based on the first step of the goodwill impairment analysis, we
determined that, as of December 31, 2008, the fair value of
each reporting unit was in excess of its carrying value. We
considered the sensitivity of these fair value estimates to
changes in certain of managements assumptions, noting
that, after giving consideration to at least a 10% decrease in
the fair value of each of our reporting units, the results of
our assessment would not have changed. Additionally, we compared
the sum of fair values of our reporting units to our market
capitalization at December 31, 2008 and determined that the
excess of the aggregate fair value of all reporting units to our
market capitalization
49
reflected a reasonable control premium. Further, our market
capitalization at December 31, 2008, which was
approximately $3.9 billion, and our carrying value,
including goodwill, was approximately $2.7 billion at
December 31, 2008. Accordingly, we determined that there
was no goodwill impairment at December 31, 2008. As of
June 30, 2009, there were no known impairment indicators at
any of the reporting units. Additionally at June 30, 2009,
our market capitalization was approximately $4.6 billion
and our aggregate carrying value, including goodwill, was
approximately $2.7 billion. Increases in the carrying value
of individual reporting units that may be indicated by our
impairment tests are not recorded, therefore we may record
goodwill impairments in the future, even when the aggregate fair
value of our reporting units as a whole may increase.
We recognize that we and our customers are operating in a
challenging business environment in light of the economic
downturn and weak capital markets. We are closely monitoring our
customers and the effect that changes in economic and market
conditions may have on them and therefore our reporting units.
Certain of our customers, in particular our electric power,
telecommunications and gas customers, have reduced spending in
the first half of 2009, which we attribute to the negative
economic and market conditions, and we anticipate that these
negative conditions may continue to affect demand for some of
our services in the near-term. We continue to monitor the impact
of the economic environment on our reporting units and the
valuation of recorded goodwill. Although we are not aware of
circumstances that would lead to a goodwill impairment at a
reporting unit currently, circumstances such as a continued
market decline, the loss of a major customer or other factors
could impact the valuation of goodwill in the future.
Outlook
Over the past two years, many utilities across the country
increased or indicated plans to increase spending on their
transmission and distribution systems, with a more significant
focus on the upgrade and build-out of the transmission grid. As
a result, new construction, structure change-outs, line upgrades
and maintenance projects on many transmission systems are
occurring. We have seen a slow-down in spending by our customers
on their distribution systems, which we believe is due primarily
to negative economic and market conditions, but we expect
distribution spending to return some time during 2010,
particularly as maintenance issues begin to affect reliability.
We believe that utilities remain committed to the expansion and
strengthening of their transmission infrastructure, and we do
not expect significant delays in large transmission projects.
However, if economic and market conditions remain stagnant or
worsen, spending on these projects could be negatively affected
as well. Additionally, as an indirect result of the economic
downturn, overall demand for electricity has decreased, which
could affect the timing and scope of transmission and
distribution spending by our customers on their existing systems
or planned projects.
We are seeing increased infrastructure spending as a result of
the Energy Policy Act of 2005, which requires the power industry
to meet federal reliability standards for its transmission and
distribution systems and provides further incentives to the
industry to invest in and improve maintenance on its systems.
The American Clean Energy and Security (ACES) Act, which was
approved by the House of Representatives in June 2009 and is
currently pending in the Senate, could also positively impact
infrastructure spending in the long-term. If enacted as
proposed, the ACES Act could alleviate some of the siting and
right-of-way challenges that impact transmission projects,
potentially accelerating future transmission projects.
Additionally, we expect the construction of renewable energy
facilities, including wind and solar power generation sources,
to result in the need for additional transmission lines and
substations. As a result of these and other factors, we expect a
continued shift over the long-term in our service mix to a
greater proportion of high-voltage electric power transmission
and substation projects, as well as opportunities to provide
installation services for renewable projects. Many of these
projects have a long-term horizon, and timing and scope can be
negatively affected by numerous factors, including regulatory
permitting, availability of funding and the effect of negative
economic and market conditions.
We believe that opportunities also exist for us to provide
engineering, project management and installation services for
renewable projects, including wind and solar. State mandates,
which set standards for how much power is required to be
generated from renewable energy sources, as well as general
environmental concerns, are driving the development of renewable
energy projects. Tax incentives and government stimulus funds
are also expected to encourage development. Additionally, the
pending ACES Act includes a proposed federal renewable portfolio
standard that we expect could further advance the installation
of renewable generation facilities. While renewable
50
energy spending declined in the latter part of 2008 and first
half of 2009, we expect future spending on renewable energy
initiatives to increase beginning in late 2009, although
investments could be impacted by capital constraints if the
financial markets continue to deteriorate or remain stagnant. It
is also not certain when or if the ACES Act will be enacted or
whether the potentially beneficial provisions we highlight in
this outlook will be included in the final legislation.
We believe that certain provisions of the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), enacted in February 2009, will
also increase demand for our services over the long-term. The
economic stimulus programs under the ARRA include incentives in
the form of grants, loans, tax cuts and tax credits for
renewable energy, energy efficiency and electric power and
telecommunications infrastructure. For example, the ARRA
extended tax credits for wind projects until 2012, which we
expect will encourage further development in wind energy.
Additionally, loan guarantee programs partially funded through
the ARRA and cash grant programs have recently been implemented
for renewable energy and transmission reliability and efficiency
projects. Funds provided to the states for the restoration,
repair and construction of highways will also likely require the
relocation and upgrade of electric power, telecommunications and
natural gas infrastructure. We anticipate investments in many of
these initiatives to create opportunities for our operations,
although we cannot predict with certainty the timing of the
implementation of the programs that support these investments or
the timing or scope of the investments once the programs are
implemented.
Several industry and market trends are also prompting customers
in the electric power industry to seek outsourcing partners.
These trends include an aging utility workforce, increasing
volumes of work, increasing costs and labor issues. The need to
ensure available labor resources for larger projects is also
driving strategic relationships with customers.
We also see potential growth opportunities over the long-term in
our gas operations, primarily in natural gas gathering and
pipeline installation and maintenance services. The natural gas
industry is cyclical as a result of fluctuations in natural gas
prices, and over the past twelve months, spending in this
industry has been negatively impacted by lower natural gas
prices and capital constraints. However, we believe that the
cyclical nature of this business can be somewhat normalized by
the opportunities associated with the on-going development of
tight gas shale formations, which will require the construction
of transmission infrastructure to connect production with demand
centers. Additionally, the objectives of the ACES Act are clean
energy and energy independence. Abundant, low-cost natural gas
is likely to be the fuel of choice to replace coal for power
generation until renewable energy becomes a significant part of
the overall generation of electricity, creating the demand for
additional production of natural gas and the need for related
infrastructure. In the past, our gas operations have been
challenged by lower margins overall, due in part to our gas
distribution services that have been impacted by certain lower
margin contracts and by declines in new housing construction.
Accordingly, we have reallocated resources to our gas
transmission opportunities and other more profitable services,
and we are optimistic about these operations in the future.
However, we expect economic and market conditions as well as the
level of natural gas prices to continue to negatively affect
this business in the near-term.
In connection with our telecommunications services, various
initiatives are underway by several wireline carriers and
government organizations that provide us with opportunities, in
particular, with respect to deployment of fiber to the premises
(FTTP) and fiber to the node (FTTN). Such initiatives have been
underway by Verizon, AT&T and other telecommunications
providers, and municipalities and other government jurisdictions
have also become active in these opportunities. Since the second
quarter of 2008, we have seen a significant slow-down in FTTP
and FTTN deployment, and we anticipate this slow-down to
continue throughout 2009. However, AT&T and Verizon remain
committed to their annual deployment goals for 2009, although
only a small portion of allocated capital expenditures was spent
in the first half of 2009. Additionally, we expect future
opportunities from certain rural broadband deployment projects,
as stimulus funding for these projects will likely be awarded to
municipalities, states and rural telephone companies, some of
which are long-standing customers. As a result of these factors,
we expect spending on FTTP and FTTN and other broadband
deployment to improve in the latter half of 2009 and into 2010,
although if economic and market conditions remain stagnant or
further deteriorate, this spending could be further delayed. In
connection with our wireless services, several wireless
companies have announced plans to increase their cell site
deployments over the next few years, including the expansion of
next generation technology. In particular, the transition to 4G
technology by wireless service providers will require the
51
enhancement of their networks. We anticipate increased
opportunities from these plans over the long-term, with the
timing and amount of spending on these plans somewhat dependent
on future economic and market conditions.
We anticipate that the future initiatives by the
telecommunication carriers will serve as a catalyst for the
cable industry to begin a new network upgrade cycle to expand
its service offerings in an effort to retain and attract
customers; however, the timing of any upgrades is uncertain.
Our Dark Fiber segment is experiencing growth primarily through
geographic expansion, with a focus on markets such as education
and healthcare where secure high-speed networks are important.
We continue to see opportunities for growth both in the markets
we currently serve and new markets, although we cannot predict
the negative impact, if any, of the current economic downturn on
these growth opportunities. To support the growth in this
business, we anticipate the need for continued significant
capital expenditures. Our Dark Fiber segment typically generates
higher margins than our other operations, but we can give no
assurance that the Dark Fiber segment margins will continue at
historical levels.
Historically, our customers have continued to spend throughout
short-term economic softness or weak recessions, although
spending over the past several months has been at reduced
levels. A longer-term or deeper recession, however, would likely
have a much more negative impact on our customers
spending. In addition, the volatility of the capital markets may
continue to negatively affect some of our customers plans
for future projects, which could be delayed, reduced or
suspended if funding is not available. It is uncertain when and
to what extent the current unfavorable economic and market
conditions will improve, or if they will deteriorate further.
Despite reductions in capital spending by some of our customers,
our revenues in certain of the industries we serve may not
decline significantly, as utilities continue spending on
projects to upgrade and build out their transmission systems and
continue outsourcing more of their work, in part due to their
aging workforce issues. We believe that we remain the partner of
choice for many utilities in need of broad infrastructure
expertise, specialty equipment and workforce resources.
Furthermore, as new technologies emerge in the future for
communications and digital services such as voice, video and
data, telecommunications and cable service providers are
expected to work quickly to deploy fast, next-generation fiber
and wireless networks, and we are recognized as a key partner in
deploying these services.
With the growth in several of our markets and our margin
enhancement initiatives, we expect to continue to see our gross
margins generally improve over the long-term, although
reductions in spending by our customers could further negatively
affect our margins, with the most significant impact to our
telecommunications, gas and electric power distribution
services. We continue to focus on the elements of the business
we can control, including costs, the margins we accept on
projects, collecting receivables, ensuring quality service and
rightsizing initiatives to match the markets we serve. These
initiatives include aligning our workforce with our current
revenue base, evaluating opportunities to reduce the number of
field offices and evaluating our non-core assets for potential
sale. Such initiatives could result in future charges related
to, among other things, severance, retention, the shutdown and
consolidation of facilities, property disposal and other exit
costs.
Capital expenditures for 2009 are expected to be approximately
$175 million, of which $85 million of these
expenditures are targeted for dark fiber network expansion with
the majority of the remaining expenditures for operating
equipment. We expect 2009 capital expenditures to continue to be
funded substantially through internal cash flows and cash on
hand.
We continue to evaluate potential strategic acquisitions or
investments to broaden our customer base, expand our geographic
area of operation and grow our portfolio of services. We believe
that additional attractive acquisition candidates exist
primarily as a result of the highly fragmented nature of the
industry, the inability of many companies to expand and
modernize due to capital constraints and the desire of owners
for liquidity. We also believe that our financial strength and
experienced management team will be attractive to acquisition
candidates.
We believe that we are adequately positioned to capitalize upon
opportunities and trends in the industries we serve because of
our proven full-service operating units with broad geographic
reach, financial capability and technical expertise.
Additionally, we believe that industry opportunities and trends
will increase the demand for our services over the long-term;
however, we cannot predict the actual timing, magnitude or
impact these opportunities and trends will have on our operating
results and financial position, especially in light of the
economic downturn and weak capital markets.
52
Uncertainty
of Forward-Looking Statements and Information
This Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
includes forward-looking statements reflecting
assumptions, expectations, projections, intentions or beliefs
about future events that are intended to qualify for the
safe harbor from liability established by the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You can
identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate
strictly to historical or current facts. They use words such as
anticipate, estimate,
project, forecast, may,
will, should, could,
expect, believe, plan,
intend and other words of similar meaning. In
particular, these include, but are not limited to, statements
relating to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Projected operating or financial results;
|
|
|
|
The effects of any acquisitions and divestitures we may make,
including the acquisition of InfraSource Services, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
Expectations regarding our business outlook, growth and capital
expenditures;
|
|
|
|
The effects of competition in our markets;
|
|
|
|
The benefits of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, renewable energy
initiatives, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
(ARRA) and other potential energy legislation;
|
|
|
|
The current economic conditions and trends in the industries we
serve; and
|
|
|
|
Our ability to achieve cost savings.
|
These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future
performance and involve or rely on a number of risks,
uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult to predict or
beyond our control. We have based our forward-looking statements
on our managements beliefs and assumptions based on
information available to our management at the time the
statements are made. We caution you that actual outcomes and
results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or
forecasted by our forward-looking statements and that any or all
of our forward-looking statements may turn out to be wrong.
Those statements can be affected by inaccurate assumptions and
by known or unknown risks and uncertainties, including the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly variations in our operating results;
|
|
|
|
Adverse changes in economic and financial conditions, including
the recent volatility in the capital markets, and trends in
relevant markets;
|
|
|
|
Delays, reductions in scope or cancellations of existing
projects, including as a result of capital constraints that may
impact our customers;
|
|
|
|
Our ability to generate internal growth;
|
|
|
|
Our dependence on fixed price contracts and the potential to
incur losses with respect to those contracts;
|
|
|
|
Estimates relating to our use of
percentage-of-completion
accounting;
|
|
|
|
Our ability to effectively compete for new projects;
|
|
|
|
Potential failure of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, renewable
energy initiatives, the ARRA or other potential energy
legislation to result in increased spending in the industries we
serve;
|
|
|
|
Cancellation provisions within our contracts and the risk that
contracts expire and are not renewed or are replaced on less
favorable terms;
|
|
|
|
Our ability to attract skilled labor and retain key personnel
and qualified employees;
|
|
|
|
The potential shortage of skilled employees;
|
|
|
|
Our ability to realize our backlog;
|
|
|
|
Estimates and assumptions in determining our financial results
and backlog;
|
|
|
|
Our ability to successfully identify, complete and integrate
acquisitions;
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
The adverse impact of goodwill, other intangible asset or
long-lived asset impairments;
|
|
|
|
The potential inability to realize a return on our capital
investments in our dark fiber infrastructure;
|
|
|
|
The inability of our customers to pay for services following a
bankruptcy or other financial difficulty;
|
|
|
|
Beliefs and assumptions about the collectability of receivables;
|
|
|
|
Liabilities for claims that are not insured;
|
|
|
|
The impact of our unionized workforce on our operations and on
our ability to complete future acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
Liabilities associated with union pension plans, including
underfunding liabilities;
|
|
|
|
Potential liabilities relating to occupational health and safety
matters;
|
|
|
|
Potential lack of available suppliers, subcontractors or
equipment manufacturers;
|
|
|
|
Our growth outpacing our infrastructure;
|
|
|
|
Unexpected costs or liabilities that may arise from lawsuits or
indemnity claims related to the services we perform;
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
and/or harm
to our reputation resulting from failures of our joint venture
partners to perform;
|
|
|
|
Our ability to obtain performance bonds;
|
|
|
|
Risks related to the implementation of an information technology
solution;
|
|
|
|
Our ability to continue to meet the requirements of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002;
|
|
|
|
Potential exposure to environmental liabilities;
|
|
|
|
Risks associated with expanding our business in international
markets, including losses that may arise from currency
fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
Requirements relating to governmental regulation and changes
thereto, including state and federal telecommunication
regulations affecting our dark fiber licensing business,
additional regulation relating to existing or potential foreign
operations and changes in legislation under the new presidential
administration;
|
|
|
|
Our ability to achieve anticipated synergies and other benefits
from our acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
Rapid technological and structural changes that could reduce the
demand for the services we provide;
|
|
|
|
The cost of borrowing, availability of credit, debt covenant
compliance, interest rate fluctuations and other factors
affecting our financing, leasing and investment activities and
thereby our ability to grow our operations;
|
|
|
|
The potential conversion of our outstanding 3.75% Notes
into cash
and/or
common stock; and
|
|
|
|
The other risks and uncertainties as are described elsewhere
herein and under Item 1A Risk Factors in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 and as disclosed in
Item 1A to Part II of our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 and as
may be detailed from time to time in our other public filings
with the SEC.
|
All of our forward-looking statements, whether written or oral,
are expressly qualified by these cautionary statements and any
other cautionary statements that may accompany such
forward-looking statements or that are otherwise included in
this report. In addition, we do not undertake and expressly
disclaim any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking
statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of
this report or otherwise.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
|
The information in this section should be read in connection
with the information on financial market risk related to changes
in interest rates and currency exchange rates in Part II,
Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk, in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008. Our
54
primary exposure to market risk relates to unfavorable changes
in concentration of credit risk, interest rates and currency
exchange rates. We are currently not exposed to any significant
market risks or interest rate risk from the use of derivatives.
Credit Risk. We are subject to concentrations
of credit risk related to our cash and cash equivalents and
accounts receivable. Substantially all of our cash investments
are managed by what we believe to be high credit quality
financial institutions. In accordance with our investment
policies, these institutions are authorized to invest this cash
in a diversified portfolio of what we believe to be high-quality
investments, which primarily include interest-bearing demand
deposits, money market mutual funds and investment grade
commercial paper with original maturities of three months or
less. Although we do not currently believe the principal amounts
of these investments are subject to any material risk of loss,
the recent volatility in the financial markets is likely to
continue to significantly impact the interest income we receive
from these investments. In addition, as we grant credit under
normal payment terms, generally with collateral, we are subject
to potential credit risk related to our customers ability
to pay for services provided. This risk may be heightened as a
result of the current financial crisis and volatility of the
markets. However, we believe the concentration of credit risk
related to trade accounts receivable is limited because of the
diversity of our customers. We perform ongoing credit risk
assessments of our customers and financial institutions and
obtain collateral or other security from our customers when
appropriate.
Interest Rate. Our exposure to market rate
risk for changes in interest rates relates to our convertible
subordinated notes. The fair market value of our fixed rate
convertible subordinated notes is subject to interest rate risk
because of their fixed interest rate and market risk due to the
convertible feature of our convertible subordinated notes.
Generally, the fair market value of fixed interest rate debt
will increase as interest rates fall and decrease as interest
rates rise. The fair market value of our convertible
subordinated notes will also increase as the market price of our
stock rises and decrease as the market price falls. The interest
and market value changes affect the fair market value of our
convertible subordinated notes but do not impact their carrying
value. As of December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009, the
fair value of the aggregate principal amount of our fixed-rate
debt of $143.8 million was approximately
$136.6 million and $160.3 million, based upon quoted
secondary market prices on or before such dates. In addition,
the volatility of the credit markets has had a negative impact
on interest income in the last several quarters, and it is
likely to significantly impact our interest income related to
our cash investments in the near-term.
Currency Risk. The business of our Canadian
subsidiaries is subject to currency fluctuations. We do not
expect any such currency risk to be material.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures.
|
Attached as exhibits to this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
are certifications of Quantas Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer that are required in accordance with
Rule 13a-14
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act). This Controls and Procedures section includes
information concerning the controls and controls evaluation
referred to in the certifications, and it should be read in
conjunction with the certifications for a more complete
understanding of the topics presented.
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management has established and maintains a system of
disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide
reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed
by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange
Act, such as this quarterly report, is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
SEC rules and forms. The disclosure controls and procedures are
also designed to provide reasonable assurance that such
information is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, we
evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to
Rule 13a-15(b)
of the Exchange Act. This evaluation was carried out under the
supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer. Based on this evaluation, these officers have concluded
that, as of
55
June 30, 2009, our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their
objectives.
Internal
Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30,
2009, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Design
and Operation of Control Systems
Our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls
and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting
will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control
system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide
only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control
systems objectives will be met. The design of a control
system must reflect the fact that there are resource
constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered
relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent
limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls
can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error
or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances
of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These
inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in
decision-making can be faulty and breakdowns can occur because
of simple errors or mistakes. Controls can be circumvented by
the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more
people, or by management override of the controls. The design of
any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions
about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no
assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated
goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or
deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or
procedures.
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings.
|
We are from time to time a party to various lawsuits, claims and
other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of
business. These actions typically seek, among other things,
compensation for alleged personal injury, breach of contract
and/or
property damages, punitive damages, civil penalties or other
losses, or injunctive or declaratory relief. With respect to all
such lawsuits, claims and proceedings, we record reserves when
it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount
of loss can be reasonably estimated. We do not believe that any
of these proceedings, separately or in the aggregate, would be
expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
Except as disclosed in Item 1A to Part II of our
Quarterly Report on From
10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2009, as of the date of this
filing, there have been no material changes from the risk
factors previously disclosed in Item 1A to Part I of
our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 (2008 Annual Report).
An investment in our common stock involves various risks. When
considering an investment in our company, you should carefully
consider all of the risk factors referenced herein and in our
2008 Annual Report. These risks and uncertainties are not the
only ones facing us and there may be additional matters that are
not known to us or that we currently consider immaterial. All of
these risks and uncertainties could adversely affect our
business, financial condition or future results and, thus, the
value of an investment in our company.
56
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
|
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table contains information about our purchases of
equity securities during the three months ended June 30,
2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Maximum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Total Number
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares Purchased
|
|
|
that may yet be
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly
|
|
|
Purchased Under
|
|
|
|
(a) Total Number of
|
|
|
(b) Average Price
|
|
|
Announced Plans
|
|
|
the Plans or
|
|
Period
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Paid Per Share
|
|
|
or Programs
|
|
|
Programs
|
|
|
May 1, 2009 May 31, 2009
|
|
|
11,430
|
(i)
|
|
$
|
21.97
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
June 1, 2009 June 30, 2009
|
|
|
26
|
(i)
|
|
$
|
23.62
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
(i) |
|
Represents shares purchased from employees to satisfy tax
withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of
restricted stock awards pursuant to the 2001 Stock Incentive
Plan (as amended and restated March 13, 2003) and the 2007 Stock
Incentive Plan. |
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
We held our annual meeting of stockholders in Houston, Texas on
May 21, 2009. Eleven members were elected to the board of
directors, each to serve until our next annual meeting of
stockholders and until their respective successors have been
elected and qualified.
The following ten individuals were elected to the board of
directors by the holders of our common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominee
|
|
For
|
|
|
Withheld
|
|
|
James R. Ball
|
|
|
168,730,557
|
|
|
|
4,090,840
|
|
John R. Colson
|
|
|
168,328,098
|
|
|
|
4,493,299
|
|
J. Michal Conaway
|
|
|
169,606,394
|
|
|
|
3,215,003
|
|
Ralph R. DiSibio
|
|
|
171,389,505
|
|
|
|
1,431,892
|
|
Bernard Fried
|
|
|
167,622,018
|
|
|
|
5,199,379
|
|
Louis C. Golm
|
|
|
170,977,035
|
|
|
|
1,844,362
|
|
Worthing F. Jackman
|
|
|
170,853,341
|
|
|
|
1,968,056
|
|
Bruce Ranck
|
|
|
170,442,579
|
|
|
|
2,378,818
|
|
John R. Wilson
|
|
|
169,155,859
|
|
|
|
3,665,538
|
|
Pat Wood, III
|
|
|
171,000,193
|
|
|
|
1,821,204
|
|
The holders of our limited vote common stock elected Vincent D.
Foster to the board of directors by a vote of
337,715 shares of limited vote common stock, with
280,820 shares withheld.
The stockholders ratified the appointment of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2009 by a vote of 172,361,888 shares of common stock and
limited vote common stock, voting together, with
(i) 368,819 shares of common stock and no shares of
limited vote common stock voting against and
(ii) 152,744 shares of common stock and no shares of
limited vote common stock abstaining.
|
|
Item 5.
|
Other
Information.
|
None.
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
No.
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation (previously filed as
Exhibit 3.3 to the Companys
Form 10-Q
(No. 001-13831)
filed August 14, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws (previously filed as
Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys 2000
Form 10-K
(No. 001-13831)
filed April 2, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
31
|
.1*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
and pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (filed herewith)
|
|
31
|
.2*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
and pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (filed herewith)
|
|
32
|
.1*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith)
|
|
101
|
.INS*
|
|
|
|
XBRL Instance Document.
|
|
101
|
.SCH*
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
|
|
101
|
.CAL*
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
|
|
101
|
.LAB*
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
|
|
101
|
.PRE*
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
|
|
101
|
.DEF*
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed or furnished herewith |
|
|
|
Included in Exhibit 101 to this report are the following
documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting
Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as
of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, and
(iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
Users of the XBRL data furnished herewith are advised pursuant
to Rule 406T of
Regulation S-T
that this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a
registration statement or prospectus for purposes of
sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed
not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability
under these sections. |
58
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant, Quanta Services, Inc., has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
Quanta Services, Inc.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Derrick
A. Jensen
|
Derrick A. Jensen
Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
Dated: August 10, 2009
59
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
No.
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation (previously filed as
Exhibit 3.3 to the Companys
Form 10-Q
(No. 001-13831)
filed August 14, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws (previously filed as
Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys 2000
Form 10-K
(No. 001-13831)
filed April 2, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
31
|
.1*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
and pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (filed herewith)
|
|
31
|
.2*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
and pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (filed herewith)
|
|
32
|
.1*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith)
|
|
101
|
.INS*
|
|
|
|
XBRL Instance Document.
|
|
101
|
.SCH*
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
|
|
101
|
.CAL*
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
|
|
101
|
.LAB*
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
|
|
101
|
.PRE*
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
|
|
101
|
.DEF*
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed or furnished herewith |
|
|
|
Included in Exhibit 101 to this report are the following
documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting
Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as
of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, and
(iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.
Users of the XBRL data furnished herewith are advised pursuant
to Rule 406T of
Regulation S-T
that this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a
registration statement or prospectus for purposes of
sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed
not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability
under these sections. |
60