Edgar Filing: DELUXE CORP

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

e10vq

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q


(Mark One)


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 1-7945

DELUXE CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Minnesota		41-0216800

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3680 Victoria St. N., Shoreview, Minnesota		55126-2966

(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(651) 483-7111
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

þ Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

þ Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer þ	Accelerated filer o	Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company o
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No

The number of shares outstanding of registrant’s common stock, par value $1.00 per share, at July 21, 2010 was 51,375,871.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


PART I-FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1. Financial Statements
	Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
	Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
	Item 4. Controls and Procedures
PART II-OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1. Legal Proceedings
	Item 1A. Risk Factors
	Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
	Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
	Item 5. Other Information
	Item 6. Exhibits
SIGNATURES
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
EX-12.1
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

PART I-FINANCIAL INFORMATION


Item 1. Financial Statements.

DELUXE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share par value)
(Unaudited)


	June 30,			December 31,
	2010			2009

ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	15,513		$	12,789
Trade accounts receivable (net of allowances for uncollectible accounts of $4,338 and $4,991, respectively)		61,478			65,564
Inventories and supplies		21,331			22,122
Deferred income taxes		10,043			10,841
Funds held for customers		39,992			26,901
Other current assets		35,658			21,282

Total current assets		184,015			159,499
Long-Term Investments (including $2,106 and $2,231 of investments at fair value, respectively)		36,728			39,200
Property, Plant, and Equipment (net of accumulated depreciation of $336,471 and $335,415, respectively)		119,200			121,797
Assets Held for Sale		4,527			4,527
Intangibles (net of accumulated amortization of $385,105 and $362,201, respectively)		171,375			145,910
Goodwill		725,387			658,666
Other Non-Current Assets		95,677			81,611

Total assets	$	1,336,909		$	1,211,210


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	65,829		$	60,640
Accrued liabilities		136,645			156,408
Short-term debt		99,000			26,000

Total current liabilities		301,474			243,048
Long-Term Debt		747,513			742,753
Deferred Income Taxes		43,908			24,800
Other Non-Current Liabilities		81,063			83,399
Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 11, 12 and 15)
Shareholders’ Equity:
Common shares $1 par value (authorized: 500,000 shares; outstanding: 2010 — 51,376; 2009 — 51,189)		51,376			51,189
Additional paid-in capital		61,429			58,071
Retained earnings		102,071			60,768
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(51,925	)		(52,818	)

Total shareholders’ equity		162,951			117,210

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	1,336,909		$	1,211,210

See Condensed Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

DELUXE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)


	Quarter Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009

Revenue	$	347,996		$	332,069		$	683,116		$	671,589
Cost of goods sold, including restructuring charges		121,940			126,964			240,303			256,223

Gross Profit		226,056			205,105			442,813			415,366

Selling, general and administrative expense		160,685			151,730			308,730			310,086
Net restructuring charges		2,151			292			1,908			115
Asset impairment charges		—			—			—			24,900

Operating Income		63,220			53,083			132,175			80,265

Gain on early debt extinguishment		—			—			—			9,834
Interest expense		(11,508	)		(11,627	)		(22,043	)		(24,047	)
Other (expense) income		(1,044	)		207			(1,400	)		565

Income Before Income Taxes		50,668			41,663			108,732			66,617

Income tax provision		17,054			13,887			41,334			26,337

Income From Continuing Operations		33,614			27,776			67,398			40,280

Net Loss From Discontinued Operations		—			—			(399	)		—

Net Income	$	33,614		$	27,776		$	66,999		$	40,280


Basic Earnings Per Share:
Income from continuing operations	$	0.65		$	0.54		$	1.31		$	0.79
Net loss from discontinued operations		—			—			(0.01	)		—
Basic earnings per share		0.65			0.54			1.30			0.79

Diluted Earnings Per Share:
Income from continuing operations	$	0.65		$	0.54		$	1.31		$	0.79
Net loss from discontinued operations		—			—			(0.01	)		—
Diluted earnings per share		0.65			0.54			1.30			0.79

Cash Dividends Per Share	$	0.25		$	0.25		$	0.50		$	0.50

Total Comprehensive Income	$	32,794		$	32,577		$	67,892		$	47,099

See Condensed Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

DELUXE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)
(Unaudited)


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2010			2009

Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net income	$	66,999		$	40,280
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations:
Net loss from discontinued operations		399			—
Depreciation		10,542			11,638
Amortization of intangibles		24,742			23,116
Asset impairment charges		—			24,900
Amortization of contract acquisition costs		9,803			12,460
Deferred income taxes		6,068			3,826
Employee share-based compensation expense		3,084			3,464
Gain on early debt extinguishment		—			(9,834	)
Other non-cash items, net		6,188			9,228
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions and discontinued operations:
Trade accounts receivable		3,043			7,203
Inventories and supplies		(36	)		1,065
Other current assets		(2,131	)		(2,969	)
Non-current assets		3,029			5,671
Accounts payable		(234	)		3,031
Contract acquisition payments		(10,689	)		(15,456	)
Other accrued and non-current liabilities		(50,268	)		(31,763	)

Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations		70,539			85,860


Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Purchases of capital assets		(21,066	)		(23,737	)
Payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired		(98,621	)		—
Purchases of customer lists		(70	)		(1,639	)
Proceeds from life insurance policies		5,782			—
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities		1,970			—
Other		(1,748	)		(3,023	)

Net cash used by investing activities of continuing operations		(113,753	)		(28,399	)


Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Net proceeds (payments) on short-term debt		73,000			(2,743	)
Payments on long-term debt		—			(22,134	)
Payments for debt issue costs, credit facility		(2,324	)		—
Change in book overdrafts		(939	)		(4,161	)
Proceeds from issuing shares under employee plans		1,600			1,042
Excess tax benefit from share-based employee awards		471			8
Payments for common shares repurchased		—			(1,319	)
Cash dividends paid to shareholders		(25,696	)		(25,621	)

Net cash provided (used) by financing activities of continuing operations		46,112			(54,928	)


Effect Of Exchange Rate Change On Cash		(174	)		500
Cash Used By Operating Activities Of Discontinued Operations		—			(470	)
Cash Used By Investing Activities Of Discontinued Operations		—			(12	)


Net Change In Cash And Cash Equivalents		2,724			2,551
Cash And Cash Equivalents: Beginning Of Period		12,789			15,590

End Of Period	$	15,513		$	18,141

See Condensed Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

DELUXE CORPORATION
CONDENSED NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1: Consolidated financial statements

The consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2010, the consolidated statements of income for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 and the consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 are unaudited. The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 was derived from audited consolidated financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States of America. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the consolidated financial statements are included. Adjustments consist only of normal recurring items, except for any discussed in the notes below. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. The consolidated financial statements and notes are presented in accordance with instructions for Form 10-Q, and do not contain certain information included in our annual consolidated financial statements and notes. The consolidated financial statements and notes appearing in this report should be read in conjunction with the consolidated audited financial statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “2009 Form 10-K”).

Note 2: New accounting pronouncements

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. This guidance requires new disclosures and clarifies some existing disclosure requirements regarding fair value measurements. The disclosures required under this guidance are included in Note 5, with the exception of disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the rollforward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures will be effective for our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2011.

In February 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-09, Subsequent Events (Topic 855): Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements. This guidance removes the requirement to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated in both issued and revised financial statements for companies that file financial statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This new guidance was effective immediately. We evaluate subsequent events through the date our financial statements are filed with the SEC.

Note 3: Supplemental balance sheet information

Inventories and supplies — Inventories and supplies were comprised of the following:


	June 30,		December 31,
(in thousands)	2010		2009

Raw materials	$	4,526	$	4,048
Semi-finished goods		8,344		8,750
Finished goods		5,078		5,602

Total inventories		17,948		18,400
Supplies, primarily production		3,383		3,722

Inventories and supplies	$	21,331	$	22,122

Marketable securities — Available-for-sale marketable securities included within funds held for customers and other current assets were comprised of the following:


	June 30, 2010
			Gross unrealized		Gross unrealized
(in thousands)	Cost		gains		losses			Fair value

Corporate investments:
Money market securities	$	1,895	$	—	$	—		$	1,895
Funds held for customers:⁽¹⁾
Money market securities		4,738		—		—			4,738
Canadian and provincial government securities		4,761		—		(3	)		4,758

Marketable securities — funds held for customers		9,499		—		(3	)		9,496

Total marketable securities	$	11,394	$	—	$	(3	)	$	11,391


⁽¹⁾		Funds held for customers, as reported on the consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2010, also included cash and cash equivalents of $30,496.


	December 31, 2009
			Gross unrealized		Gross unrealized
(in thousands)	Cost		gains		losses		Fair value

Corporate investments:
Money market securities	$	3,667	$	—	$	—	$	3,667
Funds held for customers:⁽¹⁾
Money market securities		9,522		—		—		9,522

Total marketable securities	$	13,189	$	—	$	—	$	13,189


⁽¹⁾		Funds held for customers, as reported on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009, also included cash and cash equivalents of $17,379.

Expected maturities of available-for-sale securities as of June 30, 2010 were as follows:


(in thousands)	Fair value

Due in one year or less	$	7,656
Due in one to three years		1,198
Due in three to five years		342
Due after five years		2,195

Total marketable securities	$	11,391

Further information regarding the fair value of marketable securities can be found in Note 5: Fair value measurements.

Intangibles — Intangibles were comprised of the following:


	June 30, 2010							December 31, 2009
	Gross carrying		Accumulated							Accumulated
(in thousands)	amount		amortization			Net carrying amount		Gross carrying amount		amortization			Net carrying amount

Indefinite-lived:
Trade name	$	19,100	$	—		$	19,100	$	19,100	$	—		$	19,100
Amortizable intangibles:
Internal-use software		367,146		(299,478	)		67,668		341,822		(285,181	)		56,641
Customer lists/relationships		71,469		(33,291	)		38,178		55,745		(25,777	)		29,968
Trade names		59,361		(20,268	)		39,093		51,861		(20,375	)		31,486
Distributor contracts		30,900		(25,495	)		5,405		30,900		(24,594	)		6,306
Other		8,504		(6,573	)		1,931		8,683		(6,274	)		2,409

Amortizable intangibles		537,380		(385,105	)		152,275		489,011		(362,201	)		126,810

Intangibles	$	556,480	$	(385,105	)	$	171,375	$	508,111	$	(362,201	)	$	145,910

Total amortization of intangibles was $14.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 and $11.9 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. Amortization of intangibles was $24.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and $23.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Based on the intangibles in service as of June 30, 2010, estimated future amortization expense is as follows:


(in thousands)

Remainder of 2010	$	28,438
2011		39,442
2012		20,706
2013		11,433
2014		7,992

Goodwill — Changes in goodwill during the six months ended June 30, 2010 were as follows:


	Small
	Business					Direct
(in thousands)	Services			Financial Services		Checks		Total

Balance, December 31, 2009:
Goodwill	$	596,429		$	—	$	82,237	$	678,666
Accumulated impairment charges		(20,000	)		—		—		(20,000	)

		576,429			—		82,237		658,666
Acquisition of Custom Direct, Inc. (see Note 7)		—			—		65,843		65,843
Acquisition of Cornerstone Customer Solutions, LLC (see Note 7)		—			897		—		897
Currency translation adjustment		(19	)		—		—		(19	)

Balance, June 30, 2010:
Goodwill		596,410			897		148,080		745,387
Accumulated impairment charges		(20,000	)		—		—		(20,000	)

	$	576,410		$	897	$	148,080	$	725,387

Other non-current assets — Other non-current assets were comprised of the following:


	June 30,		December 31,
(in thousands)	2010		2009

Contract acquisition costs (net of accumulated amortization of $91,673 and $107,971, respectively)	$	57,483	$	45,701
Deferred advertising costs		14,938		14,455
Other		23,256		21,455

Other non-current assets	$	95,677	$	81,611

See Note 15 for discussion of the risks associated with the recoverability of contract acquisition costs. Changes in contract acquisition costs during the first six months of 2010 and 2009 were as follows:


	Six Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands)	2010			2009

Balance, beginning of year	$	45,701		$	37,706
Additions⁽¹⁾		21,728			30,556
Amortization		(9,803	)		(12,460	)
Write-off		(143	)		—

Balance, end of period	$	57,483		$	55,802


⁽¹⁾		Contract acquisition costs are accrued upon contract execution. Cash payments made for contract acquisition costs were $10,689 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and $15,456 for the six months ended June 30, 2009.

Accrued liabilities — Accrued liabilities were comprised of the following:


	June 30,		December 31,
(in thousands)	2010		2009

Funds held for customers	$	39,880	$	26,901
Customer rebates		19,681		21,861
Employee profit sharing and pension		18,322		36,594
Wages, including vacation		11,099		5,272
Contract acquisition costs due within one year		9,610		2,795
Deferred revenue		8,817		23,720
Interest		5,241		5,227
Restructuring due within one year (see Note 8)		3,819		11,151
Other		20,176		22,887

Accrued liabilities	$	136,645	$	156,408

Note 4: Derivative financial instruments

In September 2009, we entered into interest rate swaps with a notional amount of $210.0 million to hedge against changes in the fair value of a portion of our ten-year bonds due in 2012. We entered into these swaps, which we designated as fair value hedges, to achieve a targeted mix of fixed and variable rate debt, where we receive a fixed rate and pay a variable rate based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps and the related long-term debt are included in interest expense in the consolidated statements of income. When the change in the fair value of the interest rate swaps and the hedged debt are not equal (i.e., hedge ineffectiveness), the difference in the changes in fair value affects the reported amount of interest expense in our consolidated statements of income. Hedge ineffectiveness was not significant for the quarter or six months ended June 30, 2010. The fair value of the interest rate swaps was an asset of $4.8 million as of June 30, 2010, which is included in other non-current assets on the consolidated balance sheet. As of December 31, 2009, the fair value of the interest rate swaps was a liability of $0.2 million, which is included in other non-current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. See Note 5 for further information regarding the fair value of these instruments.

Note 5: Fair value measurements

2010 acquisition — During April 2010, we purchased the stock of Custom Direct, Inc. (see Note 7). With the exception of goodwill and deferred income taxes, we were required to measure the fair value of the net identifiable tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired. The identifiable net assets acquired (excluding goodwill) were comprised primarily of a customer list, internal-use software and trade names. The fair value of the customer list was estimated using the multi-period excess earnings method. Assumptions used in this calculation included a same-customer revenue growth rate and an estimated annual customer retention rate. The customer retention rate was based on estimated re-order rates, as well as management’s estimates of the costs to obtain and retain customers. The calculated fair value of the customer list was $15.0 million, which is being amortized over 1.3 years using an accelerated method. The fair value of the internal-use software was estimated using a cost of reproduction method. The primary components of the software were identified and the estimated cost to reproduce the software was calculated based on estimated time and labor rates derived from our historical data from previous upgrades of similar size and nature. The calculated fair value of the internal-use software was $12.6 million, which is being amortized on the straight-line basis over a weighted average useful life of 4.7 years. The fair value of the trade names was estimated using a relief from royalty method, which calculates the cost savings associated with owning rather than licensing the trade names. An assumed royalty rate was applied to forecasted revenue and the resulting cash flows were discounted. The assumed royalty rate was based on market data and an analysis of the expected margins for Custom Direct’s operations. The calculated fair value of the trade names was $8.9 million, which is being amortized on the straight-line basis over 10 years.

2009 asset impairment analyses — We evaluate the carrying value of our indefinite-lived trade name and goodwill as of July 31^st of each year and between annual evaluations if events occur or circumstances change that would indicate a possible impairment. During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we experienced continued declines in our stock price, as well as a continuing negative impact of the economic downturn on our expected operating results. Based on these indicators of potential impairment, we completed impairment analyses of our indefinite-lived trade name and goodwill as of March 31, 2009.

The estimate of fair value of our indefinite-lived trade name is based on a relief from royalty method, which calculates the cost savings associated with owning rather than licensing the trade name. An assumed royalty rate is applied to forecasted revenue and the resulting cash flows are discounted. If the estimated fair value is less than the carrying value of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized. During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we recorded a non-cash asset impairment charge in our Small Business Services segment of $4.9 million related to our indefinite-lived trade name.

A two-step approach is used in evaluating goodwill for impairment. First, we compare the fair value of the reporting unit to which the goodwill is assigned to the carrying amount of its net assets. In calculating fair value, we use the income approach. The income approach is a valuation technique under which we estimate future cash flows using the reporting unit’s financial forecast from the perspective of an unrelated market participant. Future estimated cash flows are discounted to their present value to calculate fair value. During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, the carrying value of the net assets of one of our reporting units exceeded the estimated fair value. As such, the second step of the goodwill impairment analysis required that we compare the implied fair value of the goodwill to its carrying amount. In calculating the implied fair value of the goodwill, we measured the fair value of the reporting unit’s assets and liabilities, excluding goodwill. The excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the amount assigned to its assets and liabilities, excluding goodwill, is the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill. Significant intangible assets of the reporting unit identified for purposes of this impairment analysis included the indefinite-lived trade name discussed above and a distributor contract intangible asset. The fair value of the distributor contract was measured using the income approach, including adjustments for an estimated distributor retention rate based on historical experience. As a result of our analysis, we recorded a non-cash asset impairment charge during the quarter ended March 31, 2009 in our Small Business Services segment of $20.0 million related to goodwill.

Information regarding the nonrecurring fair value measurements completed during the quarter ended March 31, 2009 was as follows:


			Fair value measurements using
	Fair value		Quoted prices in active		Significant other		Significant
	as of measurement		markets for identical		observable inputs		unobservable inputs
(in thousands)	date		assets (Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		Impairment charge

Goodwill⁽¹⁾	$	20,245	$	—	$	—	$	20,245	$	20,000
Indefinite-lived trade name⁽²⁾		19,100		—		—		19,100		4,900

Total impairment charges									$	24,900


⁽¹⁾		Represents the implied fair value of the goodwill assigned to the reporting unit for which we were required to calculate this amount.

⁽²⁾		Represents the event-driven impairment analysis completed during the quarter ended March 31, 2009. This asset was reassessed during the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as part of our annual impairment analysis, at which time the fair value of the asset was estimated to be $23,500.

Recurring fair value measurements — We held, as corporate investments, available-for-sale marketable securities of $1.9 million as of June 30, 2010 and $3.7 million as of December 31, 2009. These investments are included in other current assets on the consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of these assets is determined based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. Because of the short-term nature of the underlying investments, the cost of these securities approximates their fair value. The cost of securities sold is determined using the average cost method. No gains or losses on sales of marketable securities were realized during the quarters or six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.

Funds held for customers included available-for-sale marketable securities of $9.5 million as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The fair value of these assets is determined based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. Unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, are included in other comprehensive loss on the consolidated balance sheets. Realized gains and losses are included in revenue on the consolidated statements of income and were not significant for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010. The cost of securities sold is determined using the average cost method. Funds held for customers during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2009 did not include marketable securities.

We have elected to account for a long-term investment in domestic mutual funds under the fair value option for financial assets and financial liabilities. Realized and unrealized gains and losses, as well as dividends earned by the investment, are included in selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expense in our consolidated statements of income. This investment corresponds to a liability under an officers’ deferred compensation plan which is not available to new participants and is fully funded by the investment in mutual funds. The liability under the plan equals the fair value of the investment in mutual funds. Thus, as the value of the investment changes, the liability changes accordingly. As changes in the liability are reflected within SG&A expense in the consolidated statements of income, the fair value option of accounting for the investment in mutual funds allows us to net changes in the investment and the related liability in the statements of income. The fair value of this investment is included in long-term investments in the consolidated balance sheets. The long-term investment caption on our consolidated balance sheets also includes life insurance policies which are recorded at their cash surrender values. The cost of securities sold is determined using the average cost method. Unrealized gains recognized on the investment in mutual funds were not significant during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010. We recognized net unrealized gains of $0.4 million during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and $0.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009. Realized gains and losses recognized during the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 were not significant.

The fair value of interest rate swaps (see Note 4) is determined at each reporting date by means of a pricing model utilizing readily observable market interest rates. The change in fair value is determined as the change in the present value of estimated future cash flows discounted using the LIBOR rate applicable to the interest rate swaps. During the quarter ended June 30, 2010, we recognized a gain on these derivative instruments of $2.5 million, which was offset by a loss of $2.4 million related to an increase in the fair value of the hedged long-term debt. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we recognized a gain on these derivative instruments of $5.0 million, which was offset by a loss of $4.6 million related to an increase in the fair value of the hedged long-term debt. These changes in fair value are included in interest expense in the consolidated statements of income for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010.

Information regarding recurring fair value measurements completed during each period was as follows:


			Fair value measurements using
			Quoted prices in
	Fair value		active markets for		Significant other		Significant
	as of		identical assets		observable inputs		unobservable inputs
(in thousands)	June 30, 2010		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)

Marketable securities — funds held for customers	$	9,496	$	9,496	$	—	$	—
Marketable securities — corporate investments		1,895		1,895		—		—
Long-term investment in mutual funds		2,106		2,106		—		—
Derivative assets		4,817		—		4,817		—


			Fair value measurements using
	Fair value		Quoted prices in
	as of		active markets for		Significant other		Significant
	December 31,		identical assets		observable inputs		unobservable inputs
(in thousands)	2009		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)

Marketable securities — funds held for customers	$	9,522	$	9,522	$	—	$	—
Marketable securities — corporate investments		3,667		3,667		—		—
Long-term investment in mutual funds		2,231		2,231		—		—
Derivative liabilities		152		—		152		—

Fair value measurements of other financial instruments — The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument for which it is practicable to estimate fair value.

Cash and cash equivalents, cash and cash equivalents included within funds held for customers, and short-term debt — The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of these items.

Long-term debt — The fair value of long-term debt is based on quoted prices for identical liabilities when traded as assets in an active market (Level 1 fair value measurement). The fair value of long-term debt included in the table below does not reflect the impact of hedging activity. The carrying amount of long-term debt includes the change in fair value of hedged long-term debt.

The estimated fair values of these financial instruments were as follows:


	June 30, 2010				December 31, 2009
(in thousands)	Carrying amount		Fair value		Carrying amount		Fair value

Cash and cash equivalents	$	15,513	$	15,513	$	12,789	$	12,789
Cash and cash equivalents — funds held for customers		30,496		30,496		17,379		17,379
Short-term debt		99,000		99,000		26,000		26,000
Long-term debt		747,513		731,988		742,753		719,283

Note 6: Earnings per share

The following table reflects the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations. During each period, certain options, as noted below, were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because their effect would have been antidilutive.


	Quarter Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(in thousands, except per share amounts)	2010			2009			2010			2009

Earnings per share — basic:
Income from continuing operations	$	33,614		$	27,776		$	67,398		$	40,280
Income allocated to participating securities		(173	)		(212	)		(360	)		(312	)

Income available to common shareholders	$	33,441		$	27,564		$	67,038		$	39,968

Weighted-average shares outstanding		51,163			50,824			51,100			50,767
Earnings per share — basic	$	0.65		$	0.54		$	1.31		$	0.79

Earnings per share — diluted:
Income from continuing operations	$	33,614		$	27,776		$	67,398		$	40,280
Income allocated to participating securities		(173	)		(212	)		(360	)		(312	)
Re-measurement of share-based awards classified as liabilities		(4	)		97			51			(63	)

Income available to common shareholders	$	33,437		$	27,661		$	67,089		$	39,905

Weighted-average shares outstanding		51,163			50,824			51,100			50,767
Dilutive impact of options and employee stock purchase plan		222			66			200			39

Weighted-average shares and potential dilutive shares outstanding		51,385			50,890			51,300			50,806

Earnings per share — diluted	$	0.65		$	0.54		$	1.31		$	0.79

Antidilutive options excluded from calculation		2,343			2,315			2,343			2,315

Note 7: Acquisitions and discontinued operations

During April 2010, we acquired all of the outstanding stock of Custom Direct, Inc. (Custom Direct), a leading provider of direct-to-consumer checks, in a cash transaction for $97.9 million, net of cash acquired. We funded the acquisition with our credit facility. The results of operations of this business from its acquisition date are included in our Direct Checks segment. The preliminary allocation of the purchase price based upon the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed resulted in goodwill of $65.8 million. We believe this acquisition resulted in the recognition of goodwill as we expect Custom Direct to contribute to our strategy of optimizing cash flows in our Direct Checks segment. Transaction costs related to this acquisition were expensed as incurred and were not significant to our consolidated statements of income for the quarter or six months ended June 30, 2010.

The allocation of the purchase price to the acquired assets and liabilities is preliminary pending completion of the valuation of current income taxes receivable and deferred income taxes, as well as our analysis of the establishment of reserves for uncertain income tax positions. Our preliminary allocation of the purchase price includes current income taxes receivable of $10.8 million and net deferred tax liabilities of $12.5 million. The following illustrates our preliminary allocation of the Custom Direct purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed:


(in thousands)

Cash and cash equivalents	$	24
Other current assets		13,141
Intangibles		36,487
Goodwill		65,843
Other non-current assets		5,082
Current liabilities		(8,685	)
Non-current liabilities		(13,947	)

Total purchase price		97,945
Less: cash acquired		(24	)

Purchase price, net of cash acquired	$	97,921

Acquired intangible assets included a customer list valued at $15.0 million with a useful life of 1.3 years, internal-use software valued at $12.6 million with a weighted-average useful life of 4.7 years, and trade names valued at $8.9 million with a useful life of 10 years. The software and the trade name are being amortized using the straight-line method, while the customer list is being amortized using an accelerated method. Further information regarding the calculation of the estimated fair values of these assets can be found in Note 5.

During March 2010, we purchased the assets of Cornerstone Customer Solutions, LLC (CCS) in a cash transaction for $0.7 million. CCS is a full-service, marketing solutions provider specializing in the development and execution of analytics-driven direct marketing programs. The results of operations of this business from its acquisition date are included in our Financial Services segment. The allocation of the purchase price based upon the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed resulted in tax deductible goodwill of $0.9 million. We believe this acquisition resulted in the recognition of goodwill as we are offering these strategic and tactical marketing solutions to our financial institution clients. Transaction costs related to this acquisition were expensed as incurred and were not significant to our consolidated statement of income for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

Net loss from discontinued operations for the six months ended June 30, 2010 represents an additional loss on the disposal of a previously divested business.

Note 8: Restructuring charges

Net restructuring charges for each period consisted of the following components:


	Quarter Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(in thousands)	2010			2009			2010			2009

Severance accruals	$	2,526		$	824		$	3,207		$	977
Severance reversals		(732	)		(967	)		(1,552	)		(1,596	)
Operating lease obligations		—			—			415			865
Operating lease reversals		(308	)		—			(308	)		—

Net restructuring accruals (reversals)		1,486			(143	)		1,762			246
Other costs		607			1,213			709			2,154

Net restructuring charges	$	2,093		$	1,070		$	2,471		$	2,400

2010 restructuring charges — During the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010, the net restructuring accruals included severance charges related to employee reductions primarily resulting from the acquisition of Custom Direct in April 2010 (see Note 7), as well as employee reductions in various functional areas as we continue our cost reduction initiatives. The restructuring accruals included severance benefits for 43 employees for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 and severance benefits

for 73 employees for the six months ended June 30, 2010. These charges were reduced by the reversal of restructuring accruals as fewer employees received severance benefits than originally estimated. Other restructuring costs, which were expensed as incurred, included items such as equipment moves, training and travel related to our restructuring activities. The net restructuring charges were reflected as net restructuring reversals of $0.1 million within cost of goods sold and net restructuring charges of $2.2 million within operating expenses in the consolidated statement of income for the quarter ended June 30, 2010. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, the net restructuring charges were reflected as net restructuring charges of $0.6 million within cost of goods sold and net restructuring charges of $1.9 million within operating expenses in the consolidated statement of income.

2009 restructuring charges — During the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2009, the net restructuring accruals included severance charges related to employee reductions in various functional areas as we continued our cost reduction initiatives. Net restructuring accruals for the six months ended June 30, 2009 also included operating lease obligations on two manufacturing facilities which were closed during 2009. The restructuring accruals included severance benefits for 70 employees for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and severance benefits for 81 employees for the six months ended June 30, 2009. These charges were reduced by the reversal of restructuring accruals recorded in 2008 and 2007 as fewer employees received severance benefits than originally estimated. Other restructuring costs, which were expensed as incurred, included items such as equipment moves, training and travel related to our restructuring activities. The net restructuring charges were reflected as net restructuring charges of $0.8 million within cost of goods sold and net restructuring charges of $0.3 million within operating expenses in the consolidated statement of income for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, the net restructuring charges were reflected as net restructuring charges of $2.3 million within cost of goods sold and net restructuring charges of $0.1 million within operating expenses in the consolidated statement of income.

Restructuring accruals of $4.0 million as of June 30, 2010 are reflected in the consolidated balance sheet as accrued liabilities of $3.8 million and other non-current liabilities of $0.2 million. Restructuring accruals of $11.5 million as of December 31, 2009 are reflected in the consolidated balance sheet as accrued liabilities of $11.2 million and other non-current liabilities of $0.3 million. The majority of the employee reductions are expected to be completed in 2010. We expect most of the related severance payments to be fully paid by mid-2011, utilizing cash from operations. The remaining payments due under operating lease obligations will be paid through May 2013. As of June 30, 2010, 92 employees had not yet started to receive severance benefits. Further information regarding our restructuring accruals can be found under the caption “Note 8: Restructuring charges” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in the 2009 Form 10-K.

As of June 30, 2010, our restructuring accruals, by company initiative, were as follows:


	2007			2008			2009			2010
(in thousands)	initiatives			initiatives			initiatives			initiatives			Total

Balance, December 31, 2009	$	64		$	2,175		$	9,253		$	—		$	11,492
Restructuring charges		—			516			84			3,022			3,622
Restructuring reversals		—			(762	)		(962	)		(136	)		(1,860	)
Payments, primarily severance		—			(1,195	)		(5,987	)		(2,042	)		(9,224	)

Balance, June 30, 2010	$	64		$	734		$	2,388		$	844		$	4,030


Cumulative amounts:
Restructuring charges	$	7,181		$	27,536		$	11,000		$	3,022		$	48,739
Restructuring reversals		(1,439	)		(5,647	)		(1,110	)		(136	)		(8,332	)
Payments, primarily severance		(5,678	)		(21,155	)		(7,502	)		(2,042	)		(36,377	)

Balance, June 30, 2010	$	64		$	734		$	2,388		$	844		$	4,030

As of June 30, 2010, the components of our restructuring accruals, by segment, were as follows:


													Operating
													lease
	Employee severance benefits												obligations
	Small												Small
	Business			Financial			Direct						Business
(in thousands)	Services			Services			Checks			Corporate			Services			Total

Balance, December 31, 2009	$	4,745		$	1,053		$	116		$	4,781		$	797		$	11,492
Restructuring charges		346			64			2,080			717			415			3,622
Restructuring reversals		(591	)		(131	)		(116	)		(714	)		(308	)		(1,860	)
Payments		(3,603	)		(815	)		(1,891	)		(2,527	)		(388	)		(9,224	)

Balance, June 30, 2010	$	897		$	171		$	189		$	2,257		$	516		$	4,030


Cumulative amounts for current initiatives⁽¹⁾ :
Restructuring charges	$	15,210		$	5,755		$	2,555		$	23,418		$	1,801		$	48,739
Restructuring reversals		(1,966	)		(1,244	)		(125	)		(4,676	)		(321	)		(8,332	)
Inter-segment transfer		1,552			739			61			(2,352	)		—			—
Payments		(13,899	)		(5,079	)		(2,302	)		(14,133	)		(964	)		(36,377	)

Balance, June 30, 2010	$	897		$	171		$	189		$	2,257		$	516		$	4,030


⁽¹⁾		Includes accruals related to our cost reduction initiatives for 2007 through 2010.

Note 9: Pension and other postretirement benefits

We have historically provided certain health care benefits for a large number of retired employees. In addition to our retiree health care plan, we also have a supplemental executive retirement plan in the United States. We previously had a pension plan that covered certain Canadian employees which was settled during the quarter ended March 31, 2009. Further information regarding our postretirement benefit plans can be found under the caption “Note 12: Pension and other postretirement benefits” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in the 2009 Form 10-K. See Note 15 for discussion of the risks associated with the plan assets of our postretirement benefit plan.

Pension and postretirement benefit expense for the quarters ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 consisted of the following components:


	Postretirement benefit
	plan						Pension plan
(in thousands)	2010			2009			2010		2009

Interest cost	$	1,820		$	2,140		$	45	$	51
Expected return on plan assets		(1,806	)		(1,480	)		—		—
Amortization of prior service credit		(936	)		(954	)		—		—
Amortization of net actuarial losses		1,352			2,096			—		(1	)

Total periodic benefit expense	$	430		$	1,802		$	45	$	50

Pension and postretirement benefit expense for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 consisted of the following components:


	Postretirement benefit
	plan						Pension plans
(in thousands)	2010			2009			2010		2009

Interest cost	$	3,641		$	4,184		$	90	$	161
Expected return on plan assets		(3,613	)		(2,940	)		—		(58	)
Amortization of prior service credit		(1,871	)		(1,944	)		—		—
Amortization of net actuarial losses		2,703			5,606			—		11

Total periodic benefit expense		860			4,906			90		114
Settlement loss		—			—			—		402

Net periodic benefit expense	$	860		$	4,906		$	90	$	516

Note 10: Income tax provision

Our effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was 38.0%, compared to our 2009 annual effective tax rate of 35.9%. Our 2010 effective tax rate included discrete items which increased our tax rate by 2.1 points, as well as lower tax credits in 2010 for research and development. The discrete items in 2010 consisted primarily of a $3.4 million charge resulting from a reconciliation bill, formerly known as the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, which was signed into law in March 2010 and which requires that certain tax deductions after 2012 be reduced by the amount of the Medicare Part D subsidy payments. Prior to this law change, the subsidy was to be disregarded in all future years when computing tax deductions. This resulted in a reduction in the deferred tax asset associated with our postretirement benefit plan.

Our 2009 effective tax rate included the non-deductible portion of the goodwill impairment charge recorded during the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (see Note 5), which increased our effective tax rate 2.9 percentage points. Our 2009 effective tax rate also included favorable adjustments related to receivables for prior year tax returns, which lowered our effective tax rate 2.2 percentage points.

Note 11: Debt

Total debt outstanding was comprised of the following:


	June 30,		December 31,
(in thousands)	2010		2009

5.0% senior, unsecured notes due December 15, 2012, net of discount, including cumulative change in fair value of hedged debt: 2010 - $4,389 increase; 2009 - $254 decrease	$	284,264	$	279,533
5.125% senior, unsecured notes due October 1, 2014, net of discount		263,249		263,220
7.375% senior, unsecured notes due June 1, 2015		200,000		200,000

Long-term portion of debt		747,513		742,753
Amounts drawn on credit facilities		99,000		26,000

Total debt	$	846,513	$	768,753

Our senior, unsecured notes include covenants that place restrictions on the issuance of additional debt, the execution of certain sale-leaseback agreements and limitations on certain liens. Discounts from par value are being amortized ratably as increases to interest expense over the term of the related debt.

In May 2007, we issued $200.0 million of 7.375% senior, unsecured notes maturing on June 1, 2015. The notes were issued via a private placement under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These notes were subsequently registered with the SEC via a registration statement which became effective on June 29, 2007. Interest payments are due each June and December. The notes place a limitation on restricted payments, including increases in dividend levels and share repurchases. This limitation does not apply if the notes are upgraded to an investment-grade credit rating. Principal redemptions may be made at our election at any time on or after June 1, 2011 at redemption prices ranging from 100% to 103.688% of the principal amount. In addition, at any time prior to June 1, 2011, we may redeem some or all of the notes at a price equal to

100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest and a make-whole premium. If we sell certain of our assets or experience specific types of changes in control, we must offer to purchase the notes at 101% of the principal amount. Proceeds from the offering, net of offering costs, were $196.3 million. These proceeds were subsequently used on October 1, 2007 as part of our repayment of $325.0 million of unsecured notes plus accrued interest. The fair value of the notes issued in May 2007 was $199.1 million as of June 30, 2010, based on quoted prices for identical liabilities when traded as assets.

In October 2004, we issued $275.0 million of 5.125% senior, unsecured notes maturing on October 1, 2014. The notes were issued via a private placement under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933. These notes were subsequently registered with the SEC via a registration statement which became effective on November 23, 2004. Interest payments are due each April and October. Proceeds from the offering, net of offering costs, were $272.3 million. These proceeds were used to repay commercial paper borrowings used for the acquisition of New England Business Service, Inc. in 2004. During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we retired $11.5 million of these notes, realizing a pre-tax gain of $4.1 million. As of June 30, 2010, the fair value of the $263.5 million remaining notes outstanding was $252.3 million, based on quoted prices for identical liabilities when traded as assets.

In December 2002, we issued $300.0 million of 5.0% senior, unsecured notes maturing on December 15, 2012. These notes were issued under our shelf registration statement covering up to $300.0 million in medium-term notes, thereby exhausting that registration statement. Interest payments are due each June and December. Principal redemptions may be made at our election prior to the stated maturity. Proceeds from the offering, net of offering costs, were $295.7 million. These proceeds were used for general corporate purposes, including funding share repurchases, capital asset purchases and working capital. During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we retired $19.7 million of these notes, realizing a pre-tax gain of $5.7 million. As of June 30, 2010, the fair value of the $280.3 million remaining notes outstanding was $280.6 million, based on quoted prices for identical liabilities when traded as assets. As discussed in Note 4, during September 2009, we entered into interest rate swaps with a notional amount of $210.0 million to hedge a portion of these notes. The fair value of long-term debt disclosed here does not reflect the impact of these fair value hedges. The carrying amount of long-term debt has increased $4.4 million since the inception of the interest rate swaps due to changes in the fair value of the hedged long-term debt.

As of December 31, 2009, we had a $275.0 million committed line of credit which was scheduled to expire in July 2010. During March 2010, we cancelled this line of credit and executed a new $200.0 million credit facility, which expires in March 2013. Borrowings under the credit facility are collateralized by substantially all of our assets. Our commitment fee ranges from 0.40% to 0.50% based on our leverage ratio. The credit agreement governing the credit facility contains customary covenants regarding limits on levels of subsidiary indebtedness and capital expenditures, liens, investments, acquisitions, certain mergers, certain asset sales outside the ordinary course of business, and change in control as defined in the agreement. The agreement also contains financial covenants regarding our leverage ratio, interest coverage and liquidity.

The daily average amount outstanding under our credit facilities during the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $56.6 million at a weighted-average interest rate of 3.08%. As of June 30, 2010, $99.0 million was outstanding at a weighted-average interest rate of 3.39%. During 2009, the daily average amount outstanding under our line of credit was $69.3 million at a weighted-average interest rate of 0.76%. As of December 31, 2009, $26.0 million was outstanding at a weighted-average interest rate of 0.67%. As of June 30, 2010, amounts were available for borrowing under our credit facility as follows:


	Total
(in thousands)	available

Credit facility commitment	$	200,000
Amounts drawn on credit facility		(99,000	)
Outstanding letters of credit		(9,313	)

Net available for borrowing as of June 30, 2010	$	91,687

Absent certain defined events of default under our debt instruments, and as long as our ratio of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization to interest expense is in excess of two to one, our debt covenants do not restrict our ability to pay cash dividends at our current rate.

Note 12: Other commitments and contingencies

Information regarding indemnifications, environmental matters, self-insurance and litigation can be found under the caption “Note 14: Other commitments and contingencies” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in the 2009 Form 10-K. No significant changes in these items occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2010.

Note 13: Shareholders’ equity

We have an outstanding authorization from our board of directors to purchase up to 10 million shares of our common stock. This authorization has no expiration date, and 6.4 million shares remain available for purchase under this authorization as of June 30, 2010. We did not repurchase any shares during the six months ended June 30, 2010. The terms of our $200.0 million notes maturing in 2015 place a limitation on restricted payments, including increases in dividend levels and share repurchases. The terms of our $200.0 million credit facility also limit our ability to increase dividends or repurchase shares above certain levels.

Changes in shareholders’ equity during the six months ended June 30, 2010 were as follows:


													Accumulated
	Common shares						Additional						other			Total
	Number			Par			paid-in			Retained			comprehensive			shareholders’
(in thousands)	of shares			value			capital			earnings			loss			equity

Balance, December 31, 2009		51,189		$	51,189		$	58,071		$	60,768		$	(52,818	)	$	117,210
Net income		—			—			—			66,999			—			66,999
Cash dividends		—			—			—			(25,696	)		—			(25,696	)
Common shares issued		239			239			2,089			—			—			2,328
Tax impact of share-based awards		—			—			(819	)		—			—			(819	)
Common shares retired		(53	)		(53	)		(846	)		—			—			(899	)
Fair value of share-based compensation		1			1			2,934			—			—			2,935
Amortization of postretirement prior service credit, net of tax		—			—			—			—			(1,161	)		(1,161	)
Amortization of postretirement net actuarial losses, net of tax		—			—			—			—			1,677			1,677
Amortization of loss on derivatives, net of tax⁽¹⁾		—			—			—			—			660			660
Net unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of tax		—			—			—			—			(4	)		(4	)
Currency translation adjustment		—			—			—			—			(279	)		(279	)

Balance, June 30, 2010		51,376		$	51,376		$	61,429		$	102,071		$	(51,925	)	$	162,951


⁽¹⁾		Relates to interest rate locks executed in 2004 and 2002. See the caption “Note 6: Derivative financial instruments” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in the 2009 Form 10-K.

Accumulated other comprehensive loss was comprised of the following:


	June 30,			December 31,
(in thousands)	2010			2009

Postretirement and defined benefit pension plans:
Unrealized prior service credit	$	16,817		$	17,978
Unrealized net actuarial losses		(68,651	)		(70,328	)

Postretirement and defined benefit pension plans, net of tax		(51,834	)		(52,350	)
Loss on derivatives, net of tax		(5,181	)		(5,841	)
Unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of tax		(4	)		—
Currency translation adjustment		5,094			5,373

Accumulated other comprehensive loss	$	(51,925	)	$	(52,818	)

Note 14: Business segment information

We operate three reportable business segments: Small Business Services, Financial Services and Direct Checks. Small Business Services sells personalized printed products, which include business checks, printed forms, promotional products, marketing materials and related services, as well as retail packaging supplies and a suite of business services, including web design and hosting, fraud protection, payroll, logo design, search engine marketing and business networking, to small businesses. These products and services are sold through direct response marketing, referrals from financial institutions and telecommunications companies, independent distributors and dealers, the internet and sales representatives. Financial Services’ products and services for financial instituations include comprehensive check programs for both personal and business checks, fraud prevention and monitoring services, customer acquisition campaigns, marketing communications, and services intended to enhance the financial institution customer experience, such as customer loyalty programs. These products and services are sold through multiple channels, including a direct sales force. Direct Checks sells personal and business checks and related products and services directly to consumers through direct response marketing and the internet. All three segments operate primarily in the United States. Small Business Services also has operations in Canada and Europe.

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the 2009 Form 10-K. We allocate corporate costs for our shared services functions to our business segments, including costs of our executive management, human resources, supply chain, finance, information technology and legal functions. Generally, where costs incurred are directly attributable to a business segment, primarily within the areas of information technology, supply chain and finance, those costs are reported in that segment’s results. Because we use a shared services approach for many of our functions, certain costs are not directly attributable to a business segment. These costs are allocated to our business segments based on segment revenue, as revenue is a measure of the relative size and magnitude of each segment and indicates the level of corporate shared services consumed by each segment. Corporate assets are not allocated to the segments and consist of property, plant and equipment, internal-use software, inventories and supplies related to our corporate shared services functions of manufacturing, information technology and real estate, as well as long-term investments and deferred income taxes.

We are an integrated enterprise, characterized by substantial intersegment cooperation, cost allocations and the sharing of assets. Therefore, we do not represent that these segments, if operated independently, would report the operating income and other financial information shown.

The following is our segment information as of and for the quarters ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:


		Reportable Business Segments
		Small
		Business		Financial		Direct
(in thousands)		Services		Services		Checks		Corporate		Consolidated

Revenue from external customers:	2010	$	193,165	$	98,248	$	56,583	$	—	$	347,996
	2009		191,938		100,472		39,659		—		332,069
Operating income:	2010		30,476		20,032		12,712		—		63,220
	2009		20,589		19,288		13,206		—		53,083
Depreciation and amortization expense:	2010		11,693		3,068		5,076		—		19,837
	2009		14,155		2,685		1,061		—		17,901
Total assets:	2010		778,017		68,335		185,380		305,177		1,336,909
	2009		750,858		65,891		96,015		290,132		1,202,896
Capital asset purchases:	2010		—		—		—		11,267		11,267
	2009		—		—		—		13,779		13,779

The following is our segment information as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:


		Reportable Business Segments
		Small
		Business		Financial		Direct
(in thousands)		Services		Services		Checks		Corporate		Consolidated

Revenue from external customers:	2010	$	385,491	$	199,693	$	97,932	$	—	$	683,116
	2009		385,220		202,475		83,894		—		671,589
Operating income:	2010		59,545		44,021		28,609		—		132,175
	2009		13,961		38,849		27,455		—		80,265
Depreciation and amortization expense:	2010		23,131		5,969		6,184		—		35,284
	2009		27,502		5,195		2,057		—		34,754
Asset impairment charges:	2010		—		—		—		—		—
	2009		24,900		—		—		—		24,900
Total assets:	2010		778,017		68,335		185,380		305,177		1,336,909
	2009		750,858		65,891		96,015		290,132		1,202,896
Capital asset purchases:	2010		—		—		—		21,066		21,066
	2009		—		—		—		23,737		23,737

Note 15: Market risks

Due to the downturn in the U.S. economy, including the liquidity crisis in the credit markets, as well as failures and consolidations of companies within the financial services industry since 2008, we have identified certain market risks which may affect our future operating performance.

Economic conditions – As discussed in Note 5, during the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we completed impairment analyses of goodwill and our indefinite-lived trade name due to indicators of potential impairment. We recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $20.0 million in our Small Business Services segment related to one of our reporting units, as well as an impairment charge of $4.9 million in our Small Business Services segment related to an indefinite-lived trade name. The annual impairment analyses completed during the quarter ended September 30, 2009 indicated that the calculated fair values of our reporting units’ net assets exceeded their carrying values by amounts between $18 million and $308 million, or by amounts between 46% and 70% above the carrying values of their net assets. The calculated fair value of our indefinite-lived trade name exceeded its carrying value of $19.1 million by $4.4 million based on the analysis completed during the quarter ended September 30, 2009. Due to the ongoing uncertainty in market conditions, which may continue to negatively impact our expected operating results or share price, we will continue to monitor whether additional impairment analyses are required with respect to the carrying value of goodwill and the indefinite-lived trade name.

Postretirement benefit plan – The fair value of the plan assets of our postretirement benefit plan is subject to various risks, including credit, interest and overall market volatility risks. During 2008, the equity markets experienced a significant decline in value. As such, the fair value of our plan assets decreased significantly during the year, resulting in a $29.9 million increase in the unfunded status of our plan as compared to the end of the previous year. This affected the amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008 and also contributed to an increase in postretirement benefit expense of $2.4 million in 2009, as compared to 2008. As of December 31, 2009, the fair value of our plan assets had partially recovered, contributing to an $11.8 million improvement in the unfunded status of our plan as compared to December 31, 2008. If the equity and bond markets decline in future periods, the funded status of our plan could again be materially affected. This could result in higher postretirement benefit expense in the future, as well as the need to contribute increased amounts of cash to fund the benefits payable under the plan, although our obligation is limited to funding benefits as they become payable. We did not use plan assets to make benefit payments during the first six months of 2010 or during 2009. Rather, we used cash provided by operating activities to make these payments.

Financial institution clients – Continued turmoil in the financial services industry, including further bank failures and consolidations, could have a significant impact on our consolidated results of operations if we were to lose a significant contract and/or we were unable to recover the value of an unamortized contract acquisition cost or account receivable. As of June 30, 2010, unamortized contract acquisition costs totalled $57.5 million, while liabilities for contract acquisition costs not paid as of June 30, 2010 were $19.8 million. The inability to recover amounts paid to one or more of our larger financial institution clients could have a significant negative impact on our consolidated results of operations.

The consolidation of financial institutions may also impact our results of operations. In the past we have acquired new clients as financial institutions that were not our clients consolidated with our clients. When two of our financial institution clients consolidate, the increase in general negotiating leverage possessed by the consolidated entity could result in a new contract which is not as favorable to us as those historically negotiated with the clients individually. However, we may also generate non-recurring conversion revenue when obsolete checks have to be replaced after one financial institution merges with or acquires another. Conversely, we have also lost financial institution clients when they consolidated with financial institutions which were not our clients. If we were to lose a significant amount of business in this manner, it could have a significant negative impact on our consolidated results of operations. In such situations, we have typically collected contract termination payments and we may be able to do so in similar circumstances in the future.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

Our business is organized into three segments: Small Business Services, Financial Services and Direct Checks. Our Small Business Services segment generated 56.4% of our consolidated revenue for the first six months of 2010. This segment has sold personalized printed products, which include business checks, printed forms, promotional products, marketing materials and related services, as well as retail packaging supplies and a suite of business services, including web design and hosting, fraud protection, payroll, logo design, search engine marketing and business networking, to over four million small businesses in the last 24 months. These products and services are sold through direct response marketing, referrals from financial institutions and telecommunications companies, independent distributors and dealers, the internet and sales representatives. Our Financial Services segment generated 29.2% of our consolidated revenue for the first six months of 2010. This segment’s products and services for financial instituations include comprehensive check programs for both personal and business checks, fraud prevention and monitoring services, customer acquisition campaigns, marketing communications, and services intended to enhance the financial institution customer experience, such as customer loyalty programs. These products and services are sold through multiple channels, including a direct sales force, to 6,400 financial institution clients nationwide, including banks, credit unions and financial services companies. Our Direct Checks segment generated 14.4% of our consolidated revenue for the first six months of 2010, including Custom Direct, Inc., which was acquired in April 2010. This segment is the nation’s leading direct-to-consumer check supplier, selling under various brand names including Checks Unlimited^®, Designer^® Checks, Checks.com, Check Gallery^®, The Styles Check Company^®, and Artistic Checks^®, among others. Through these brands, we sell personal and business checks and related products and services directly to consumers using direct response marketing and the internet. We operate primarily in the United States. Small Business Services also has operations in Canada and Europe.

We have continued to see the negative impact of the economic environment on our results of operations for the first half of 2010. The severe downturn in the economy and the turmoil in the financial services industry continue to affect our operating results. Demand has fallen for many of our Small Business Services products as we believe small business owners have reduced their discretionary spending. Additionally, we believe interruptions and consumer uncertainty related to financial institution consolidations and failures have led to reduced check orders from several of our financial institution

clients. During this difficult economic environment, we have accelerated many of our cost reduction actions, and we have identified additional opportunities to improve our cost structure. We believe we have taken appropriate steps to position ourselves for sustainable growth as the economy recovers, including accelerating our brand awareness and positioning initiatives, investing in technology for new service offerings, enhancing our internet capabilities, improving customer segmentation and adding new small business customers. We have invested in acquisitions that offer higher growth business services, extend our direct-to-consumer offerings, enhance our cash flow generating capabilities, and bring analytics-driven deposit acquisition marketing programs to our financial institution clients. We are focused on capitalizing on transformational opportunities available to us in this difficult environment and believe that we will be positioned to consistently deliver strong margins once the economy recovers.

Our earnings for the first half of 2010, as compared to the first half of 2009, benefited from the following:

•

Asset impairment charges of $24.9 million in the first quarter of 2009 within Small Business Services related to goodwill and an indefinite-lived trade name;

•

Continuing initiatives to reduce our cost structure, primarily within manufacturing, sales and marketing and information technology;

•

Recognition of deferred revenue from a Financial Services contract termination settlement executed in the fourth quarter of 2009; and

•

Price increases in Small Business Services and Financial Services.

These benefits were partially offset by the following:

•

Pre-tax gains of $9.8 million in the first quarter of 2009 from the retirement of long-term notes;

•

Reduced volume for our personal check businesses due to the continuing decline in check usage, turmoil in the financial services industry, including bank failures, and continued economic softness;

•

Lower volume in Small Business Services due primarily to changes in our customers’ buying patterns, we believe, as a result of the continued economic downturn;

•

Increased marketing investment in brand positioning and awareness; and

•

Increases in delivery rates.

Our Strategies

Details concerning our strategies were provided in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “2009 Form 10-K”). There were no significant changes in our strategies during the first half of 2010.

During April 2010, we acquired all of the outstanding stock of Custom Direct, Inc. (Custom Direct), a leading provider of direct-to-consumer checks, in a cash transaction for $97.9 million, net of cash acquired. We funded the acquisition with our credit facility. The results of operations of this business from its acquisition date are included in our Direct Checks segment. We expect the acquisition of Custom Direct to contribute to our strategy of optimizing cash flows in this segment. During 2010, the acquisition is expected to generate approximately $60 million in revenue and $15 million of operating cash flow, including cash tax savings of approximately $10 million from certain acquired tax attributes, although we have not completed our analysis of these income tax positions. The acquisition is expected to be neutral to earnings per share in 2010, including $2.5 million of severance benefits and other transaction-related costs, as well as approximately $12 million of acquisition-related amortization.

Update on Cost Reduction Initiatives

As discussed in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of the 2009 Form 10-K, we are pursuing aggressive cost reduction and business simplification initiatives which we expect to collectively reduce our annual cost structure by at least $325 million, net of required investments, by the end of 2010. The baseline for these anticipated savings is the estimated cost structure for 2006, which was reflected in the earnings guidance reported in our press release on July 27, 2006 regarding second quarter 2006 results. We estimate that we realized approximately $260 million of the $325 million target through the end of 2009, and we are currently on track to realize the remaining $65 million in 2010. To date, most of our savings are from sales and marketing, information technology and fulfillment, including manufacturing and supply chain.

Outlook for 2010

We anticipate that consolidated revenue from continuing operations for 2010 will be between $1.390 billion and $1.415 billion, as compared to $1.344 billion for 2009, including approximately $60 million of revenue from the Custom Direct acquisition. In July 2010, we finalized a contract settlement with a large financial institution that previously acquired one of our clients and recently chose to consolidate its check printing business with another provider. We have been producing checks for a minority portion of this client’s customers. This business is expected to transition during the third quarter of 2010 and we expect to receive contract termination payments of approximately $24 million, which will be included in revenue in our Small Business Services and Financial Services segments. Including the anticipated reduction in volume from the termination of this contract, we expect a net positive impact on revenue of approximately $18 million from the contract settlement.

Excluding the contract settlement, in Small Business Services we expect the revenue decline percentage to be in the very low single digits to flat range as declines in core business products are expected to be offset by growth in business service offerings, including 2009 acquisitions, and benefits from our e-commerce investments. We expect that approximately $10 million of the net contract settlement will be included in Small Business Services revenue. Excluding the contract settlement, in Financial Services we expect the revenue decline percentage to be in the low single digits to flat range. We estimate that the decline in check orders will be approximately eight percent compared to 2009, given the continued weak economy and increases in electronic payments. The eight percent estimated decline in check orders may not necessarily correspond to our reported decline in orders, as it is an overall estimate, excluding the impact of client additions and losses. We expect these declines to be partially offset by higher revenue per order from price increases, the amortization of a past contract settlement, a new contract acquisition which will begin to contribute volume in the second half of the year, and continued contributions from non-check revenue streams. We expect that approximately $8 million of the net contract settlement will be included in Financial Services revenue. Direct Checks revenue is expected to increase approximately thirty percent driven by the Custom Direct acquisition and improved reorder volumes stemming from past quantity reductions, partially offset by check usage declines and the continued weak economy.

We expect that 2010 diluted earnings per share will be between $2.90 and $3.00, which includes an estimated $0.30 per diluted share impact of the $24 million third quarter contract settlement, as well as an estimated $0.10 per share impact of a first quarter charge to income tax expense due to recent health care reform legislation and restructuring-related costs. Earnings per share for 2009 was $1.94, which included a $0.50 per share impact of impairment charges, restructuring and transaction-related costs, and gains on debt repurchases. We expect that continued execution of our cost reduction initiatives will be offset by the revenue decline, excluding the Custom Direct acquisition, continued investments in revenue growth opportunities and increases in delivery rates. Our outlook reflects a merit wage freeze in 2010, leaving base salary levels consistent with 2009. We estimate that our annual effective tax rate for 2010 will be approximately 34%, excluding a first quarter charge of $3.4 million related to recent health care reform legislation, compared to 35.9% in 2009.

We believe our credit facility, along with cash generated by operating activities, will be sufficient to support our operations, including capital expenditures, small-to-medium-sized acquisitions, required debt service and dividend payments, for the next 12 months. With no long-term debt maturities until December 2012, we are focused on a disciplined approach to capital deployment that focuses on our need to continue investing in initiatives to drive revenue growth, including small-to-medium-sized acquisitions. We also anticipate that our board of directors will maintain our current dividend level. However, dividends

are approved by the board of directors on a quarterly basis and thus, are subject to change. To the extent we have cash flow in excess of these priorities, our focus during the remainder of 2010 will be on further reducing our debt. During the first half of 2010, we borrowed $73.0 million under our credit facility, primarily to complete the acquisition of Custom Direct.

BUSINESS CHALLENGES/MARKET RISKS

Details concerning business challenges/market risks were provided in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of our 2009 Form 10-K. There were no significant changes in these items during the first half of 2010.

CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Consolidated Revenue


	Quarter Ended June 30,							Six Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands, except per order amounts)	2010		2009		Change			2010		2009		Change

Revenue	$	347,996	$	332,069		4.8	%	$	683,116	$	671,589		1.7	%
Orders		14,501		14,830		(2.2	)%		28,574		30,127		(5.2	)%
Revenue per order	$	24.00	$	22.39		7.2	%	$	23.91	$	22.29		7.3	%

The increase in revenue for the second quarter and first half of 2010, as compared to the same periods in 2009, was due to a revenue contribution of $18.3 million from the acquisition of Custom Direct in April 2010 discussed under Executive Overview, as well as higher revenue per order in Financial Services, sales of business services by other businesses acquired in 2009 and 2010, price increases in Small Business Services and a favorable currency exchange rate impact of $2.1 million for the second quarter of 2010 and $5.2 million for the first half of 2010. Partially offsetting these revenue increases was lower order volume.

The number of orders decreased for the second quarter and first half of 2010, as compared to the same periods in 2009, due primarily to general economic conditions which we believe affected our customers’ buying patterns, as well as the continuing decline in check and forms usage, partially offset by the acquisition of Custom Direct in April 2010. Revenue per order increased for the second quarter and first half of 2010, as compared to the same periods in 2009, primarily due to the recognition of deferred revenue from a Financial Services contract termination settlement executed in the fourth quarter of 2009 and the benefit of price increases, partially offset by continued pricing pressure when executing contracts within Financial Services.

Consolidated Gross Margin


	Quarter Ended June 30,									Six Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands)	2010			2009			Change			2010			2009			Change

Gross profit	$	226,056		$	205,105			10.2	%	$	442,813		$	415,366			6.6	%
Gross margin		65.0	%		61.8	%	3.2		pts.		64.8	%		61.8	%	3.0		pts.

We evaluate gross margin when analyzing our consolidated results of operations as we believe it provides important insight into significant profit drivers. As more than 90% of our revenue at this time is generated from the sale of manufactured and purchased products, the measure of gross margin best demonstrates our manufacturing and distribution performance, as well as the impact of pricing on our profitability. Gross margin is not a complete measure of profitability, as it omits selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expense. However, it is a financial measure which is useful in evaluating our results of operations.

Gross margin increased for the second quarter and first half of 2010, as compared to the same periods in 2009, due primarily to manufacturing efficiencies and other benefits resulting from our cost reduction initiatives, as well as the higher revenue per order discussed earlier and favorable product mix. Also contributing to the higher gross margin was a decrease in restructuring charges and other costs related to our cost reduction initiatives. Restructuring and related costs decreased $1.4 million for the second quarter of 2010 and $3.3 million for the first six months of 2010, as compared to the same periods in 2009. Further information regarding our restructuring costs can be found under Restructuring Costs. The lower charges for restructuring and related costs contributed 0.4 percentage points of the increase in gross margin for the second quarter of 2010, as compared to 2009, and 0.5 percentage points of the increase in gross margin for the first half of 2010 as compared to 2009.

Consolidated Selling, General & Administrative Expense


	Quarter Ended June 30,									Six Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands)	2010			2009			Change			2010			2009			Change

SG&A expense	$	160,685		$	151,730			5.9	%	$	308,730		$	310,086			(0.4	)%
SG&A as a percentage of revenue		46.2	%		45.7	%	0.5		pt.		45.2	%		46.2	%	(1.0		) pt.

The increase in SG&A expense for the second quarter of 2010, as compared to the second quarter of 2009, was driven primarily by expenses from the businesses we acquired in 2009 and 2010, as well as marketing investments in our brand awareness and positioning initiatives. These increases were partly offset by various cost reduction initiatives within our shared services organizations, primarily within sales and marketing and information technology, as well as lower acquisition-related amortization related to acquisitions completed prior to 2009.

The decrease in SG&A expense for the first half of 2010, as compared to the first half of 2009, was due primarily to various cost reduction initiatives within our shared services organizations, primarily within sales and marketing and information technology, as well as lower acquisition-related amortization related to acquisitions completed prior to 2009. Partially offsetting these decreases were expenses from the businesses we acquired in 2009 and 2010 and marketing investments in our brand awareness and positioning initiatives.

Net Restructuring Charges


	Quarter Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands)	2010		2009		Change		2010		2009		Change

Net restructuring charges	$	2,151	$	292	$	1,859	$	1,908	$	115	$	1,793

We recorded restructuring charges and reversals related to the cost reduction initiatives discussed under Executive Overview. The charges and reversals for each period primarily relate to accruals for employee severance benefits. Additional restructuring charges were included within cost of goods sold in our consolidated statements of income for each period. Further information can be found under Restructuring Costs.

Asset Impairment Charges


	Quarter Ended June 30,			Six Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands)	2010	2009	Change	2010	2009		Change

Asset impairment charges	$—	$—	$—	$—	$	24,900	$	(24,900	)

As of March 31, 2009, we completed impairment analyses of goodwill and an indefinite-lived trade name due to declines in our stock price during the first quarter of 2009 coupled with the continuing negative impact of the economic downturn on our expected operating results. We recorded non-cash asset impairment charges in our Small Business Services segment of $20.0 million related to goodwill and $4.9 million related to the indefinite-lived trade name. Further information regarding our impairment analyses can be found under the caption “Note 5: Fair value measurements” of the Condensed Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in Item 1 of this report.

Gain on Early Debt Extinguishment


	Quarter Ended June 30,			Six Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands)	2010	2009	Change	2010	2009		Change

Gain on early debt extinguishment	$—	$—	$—	$—	$	9,834	$	(9,834	)

During the first quarter of 2009, we retired $31.2 million of long-term notes at an average 32% discount from par value, realizing a pre-tax gain of $9.8 million. We may retire additional debt, depending on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements and other potential uses of cash, including acquisitions or share repurchases.

Interest Expense


	Quarter Ended June 30,									Six Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands)	2010			2009			Change			2010			2009			Change

Interest expense	$	11,508		$	11,627			(1.0	)%	$	22,043		$	24,047			(8.3	)%
Weighted-average debt outstanding		838,967			817,448			2.6	%		800,367			829,625			(3.5	)%
Weighted-average interest rate		5.02	%		5.22	%	(0.20)		pt.		5.07	%		5.24	%	(0.17)		pt.

The decrease in interest expense for the second quarter of 2010, as compared to the second quarter of 2009, was due primarily to the impact of interest rate swaps. During the third quarter of 2009, we entered into interest rate swaps with a notional amount of $210.0 million to hedge against changes in the fair value of a portion of our long-term debt. These fair value hedges reduced interest expense by $0.9 million during the second quarter of 2010. This decrease in interest expense was partly offset by a higher average debt level in the second quarter of 2010 due to borrowings to complete the Custom Direct acquisition.

The decrease in interest expense for the first half of 2010, as compared to the first half of 2009, was due to a $2.0 million favorable impact of the interest rates swaps during the first half of 2010, as well as the lower average debt level in 2010. Additionally, due to the early retirement of long-term notes during the first quarter of 2009, we were required to accelerate the recognition of a portion of a previously deferred derivative loss. This resulted in additional interest expense of $0.5 million during the first half of 2009.

Income Tax Provision


	Quarter Ended June 30,									Six Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands)	2010			2009			Change			2010			2009			Change

Income tax provision	$	17,054		$	13,887			22.8	%	$	41,334		$	26,337			56.9	%
Effective tax rate		33.7	%		33.3	%	0.4		pt.		38.0	%		39.5	%	(1.5		) pts.

The increase in our effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2010, as compared to the second quarter of 2009, was primarily due to a higher state income tax rate in 2010. This increase was partly offset by the higher favorable impact of discrete items in 2010. Discrete credits to income tax expense in the second quarter of 2010 lowered our effective tax rate 2.7 points and consisted primarily of reductions in accruals for uncertain tax positions. Discrete credits to income tax expense in the second quarter of 2009 lowered our effective tax rate 2.0 points and consisted primarily of receivables related to prior year tax returns.

The decrease in our effective tax rate for the first half of 2010, as compared to the first half of 2009, was primarily due to the impact of discrete income tax expense in 2009, which increased our effective tax rate 3.9 points for the first half of 2009. The discrete items in 2009 consisted of the non-deductible portion of the goodwill impairment charge, among other items. Discrete income tax expense in 2010 increased our effective tax rate by 2.1 points. The discrete items in 2010 consisted primarily of a $3.4 million charge resulting from a reconciliation bill, formerly known as the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, which was signed into law in March 2010 and which requires that certain tax deductions after 2012 be reduced by the amount of the Medicare Part D subsidy payments. Prior to this law change, the subsidy was to be disregarded in all future years when computing tax deductions. This resulted in a reduction in the deferred tax asset associated with our postretirement benefit plan.

RESTRUCTURING COSTS

During the first half of 2010, we recorded net restructuring charges of $2.5 million. This amount included expenses related to our restructuring activities, including equipment moves, training and travel which were expensed as incurred, as well as net restructuring accruals of $1.8 million. The net restructuring accruals included charges of $3.2 million related to severance for employee reductions primarily resulting from the acquisition of Custom Direct in April 2010, as well as reductions in various functional areas as we continue our cost reduction initiatives. The net restructuring accruals included severance benefits for 73 employees. Further information regarding our cost reduction initiatives can be found under Executive Overview. These charges were reduced by the reversal of $1.6 million of severance accruals as fewer employees received severance benefits than originally estimated. The restructuring charges were reflected as net restructuring charges of $0.6 million within cost of goods sold and net restructuring charges of $1.9 million within operating expenses in the consolidated statement of income for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

During 2009, we recorded net restructuring charges of $12.0 million. This amount included expenses related to our restructuring activities, including items such as equipment moves, training and travel which were expensed as incurred, as well as net restructuring accruals of $8.2 million. The net restructuring accruals included charges of $11.8 million related to

severance for employee reductions in various functional areas, including the closing of one customer call center, which was completed in the first quarter of 2010, and further consolidation in the sales, marketing and fulfillment organizations, as well as operating lease obligations on three manufacturing facilities closed during 2009. These actions were the result of our cost reduction initiatives. The net restructuring accruals included severance benefits for 643 employees.

During 2009, we closed seven manufacturing operations and two customer call centers which were located in five leased facilities and three owned facilities. The operations and related assets were relocated to other locations. We have remaining rent obligations for three of the five leased facilities and we are actively marketing the three owned facilities. The remaining payments due under the operating lease obligations will be paid through May 2013. Although we closed the manufacturing operations within our Colorado Springs, Colorado facility during 2009, this owned location also houses administrative functions and two customer call centers, one of which we closed during the first quarter of 2010. Once this facility is sold, we plan to relocate the remaining employees to another location in the same area. The majority of the employee reductions included in our restructuring accruals are expected to be completed in 2010. We expect most of the related severance payments to be fully paid by mid-2011 utilizing cash from operations.

As a result of our employee reductions and facility closings, we expect to realize cost savings of approximately $11 million in cost of goods sold and $21 million in SG&A expense in 2010 relative to 2009. These cost savings exclude the impact of Custom Direct employee reductions, as Custom Direct’s results of operations were not included in our 2009 results. Expense reductions consist primarily of labor and facility costs.

Further information regarding our restructuring charges can be found under the caption “Note 8: Restructuring charges” of the Condensed Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in Item 1 of this report.

SEGMENT RESULTS

Additional financial information regarding our business segments appears under the caption “Note 14: Business segment information” of the Condensed Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in Item 1 of this report.

Small Business Services

This segment sells personalized printed products, which include business checks, printed forms, promotional products, marketing materials and related services, as well as retail packaging supplies and a suite of business services including web design and hosting, fraud protection, payroll, logo design, search engine marketing and business networking, to small businesses. These products and services are sold through direct response marketing, referrals from Financial Services’ financial institution clients and Small Business Services’ telecommunications clients, independent distributors and dealers, the internet and sales representatives.


	Quarter Ended June 30,									Six Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands)	2010			2009			Change			2010			2009			Change

Revenue	$	193,165		$	191,938			0.6	%	$	385,491		$	385,220			0.1	%
Operating income		30,476			20,589			48.0	%		59,545			13,961			326.5	%
Operating margin		15.8	%		10.7	%	5.1		pts.		15.4	%		3.6	%	11.8		pts.

The increase in revenue for the second quarter and first half of 2010, as compared to the same periods in 2009, was due primarily to sales of products and services by businesses acquired in 2009, as well as price increases and a favorable currency exchange rate impact related to our Canadian operations of $2.1 million for the second quarter of 2010 and $5.2 million for the first half of 2010. These increases in revenue were partly offset by the impact of negative general economic conditions which we believe affected our customers’ buying patterns, as well as the continuing decline in check and forms usage.

The increase in operating income and operating margin for the second quarter of 2010, as compared to the second quarter of 2009, was due to continued progress on our cost reduction initiatives, price increases, lower acquisition-related amortization related to acquisitions completed prior to 2009, favorable product mix and a $2.3 million reduction in restructuring and transaction-related costs in 2010. Further information regarding the restructuring costs can be found under Restructuring Costs. These increases in operating income were partially offset by the impacts of negative economic conditions, the continuing decline in checks and forms, marketing investments in our brand awareness and positioning initiatives, and increases in delivery rates.

Operating income and operating margin increased for the first half of 2010, as compared to the first half of 2009, for the same reasons as discussed for the quarter. In addition, the increase was due to the asset impairment charges of $24.9 million in 2009 discussed earlier under Consolidated Results of Operations and a $4.1 million reduction in restructuring and transaction-related costs in 2010.

Financial Services

Financial Services’ products and services for financial instituations include comprehensive check programs for both personal and business checks, fraud prevention and monitoring services, customer acquisition campaigns, marketing communications, and services intended to enhance the financial institution customer experience, such as customer loyalty programs. These products and services are sold through multiple channels, including a direct sales force. As part of our check programs, we also offer enhanced services such as customized reporting, file management and expedited account conversion support.


	Quarter Ended June 30,									Six Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands)	2010			2009			Change			2010			2009			Change

Revenue	$	98,248		$	100,472			(2.2	)%	$	199,693		$	202,475			(1.4	)%
Operating income		20,032			19,288			3.9	%		44,021			38,849			13.3	%
Operating margin		20.4	%		19.2	%	1.2		pts.		22.0	%		19.2	%	2.8		pts.

The decrease in revenue for the second quarter and first half of 2010, as compared to the same periods in 2009, was due primarily to a decrease in order volume resulting from the continuing decline in check usage and the weak economy. The volume decline and continuing competitive pricing pressure were partly offset by higher revenue per order from the recognition of deferred revenue related to a contract termination settlement executed in the fourth quarter of 2009, price increases implemented in the second quarter of 2010 and the third quarter of 2009, and increased non-check revenue.

Operating income and operating margin increased for the second quarter and first half of 2010, as compared to the same periods in 2009, primarily due to higher revenue per order and the benefit of our various cost reduction initiatives. These increases in operating income and operating margin were partially offset by the volume decline, increased marketing investment and delivery rate increases.

Direct Checks

Direct Checks sells personal and business checks and related products and services directly to consumers using direct response marketing and the internet. We use a variety of direct marketing techniques to acquire new customers in the direct-to-consumer channel, including newspaper inserts, in-package advertising, statement stuffers and co-op advertising. We also use e-commerce strategies to direct traffic to our websites. Direct Checks sells under various brand names including Checks Unlimited®, Designer® Checks, Checks.com, Check Gallery®, The Styles Check Company®, and Artistic Checks®, among others.


	Quarter Ended June 30,									Six Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands)	2010			2009			Change			2010			2009			Change

Revenue	$	56,583		$	39,659			42.7	%	$	97,932		$	83,894			16.7	%
Operating income		12,712			13,206			(3.7	)%		28,609			27,455			4.2	%
Operating margin		22.5	%		33.3	%	(10.8)		pts.		29.2	%		32.7	%	(3.5		) pts.

The increase in revenue for the second quarter and first half of 2010, as compared to the same periods in 2009, was due to the revenue contribution of $18.3 million from the acquisition of Custom Direct in April 2010 discussed under Executive Overview. Partially offsetting the impact of the acquisition was a reduction in orders stemming from the decline in check usage, as well as the weak economy.

The decrease in operating income and operating margin for the second quarter of 2010, as compared to the second quarter of 2009, was due to an increase of $2.4 million in restructuring-related costs related primarily to employee reductions at Custom Direct, as well as the lower order volume and increased delivery rates. These decreases in operating income were partly offset by the benefit of our cost reduction initiatives.

The increase in operating income for the first half of 2010, as compared to the first half of 2009, was due primarily to the benefit of our cost reduction initiatives, partially offset by the lower order volume, an increase of $2.4 million in restructuring-related costs and increased delivery rates.

CASH FLOWS

As of June 30, 2010, we held cash and cash equivalents of $15.5 million. The following table shows our cash flow activity for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated statements of cash flows appearing in Item 1 of this report.


	Six Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands)	2010			2009			Change

Continuing operations:
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	70,539		$	85,860		$	(15,321	)
Net cash used by investing activities		(113,753	)		(28,399	)		(85,354	)
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities		46,112			(54,928	)		101,040
Effect of exchange rate change on cash		(174	)		500			(674	)

Net cash provided by continuing operations		2,724			3,033			(309	)
Net cash used by operating activities of discontinued operations		—			(470	)		470
Net cash used by investing activities of discontinued operations		—			(12	)		12

Net change in cash and cash equivalents	$	2,724		$	2,551		$	173

The $15.3 million decrease in cash provided by operating activities for the first half of 2010, as compared to the first half of 2009, was due primarily to an $18.4 million increase in 2010 in employee profit sharing payments and pension contributions related to our 2009 performance, as well as higher income tax payments. These decreases in cash provided by operating activities were partially offset by a decrease of $4.8 million in contract acquisition payments in 2010 as compared to 2009, as well as the higher earnings discussed earlier under Consolidated Results of Operations.

Included in net cash provided by operating activities were the following operating cash outflows:


	Six Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands)	2010		2009		Change

Income tax payments	$	39,060	$	31,946	$	7,114
Voluntary employee beneficiary association (VEBA) trust contributions to fund medical benefits		22,800		21,800		1,000
Interest payments		22,120		21,985		135
Contract acquisition payments		10,689		15,456		(4,767	)
Severance payments		8,836		9,985		(1,149	)
Employee profit sharing payments and pension contributions		29,790		11,430		18,360

Net cash used by investing activities in the first half of 2010 was $85.4 million higher than the first half of 2009 primarily due to the acquisition of Custom Direct in April 2010, partly offset by proceeds from life insurance policies in 2010 and a $2.7 reduction in purchases of capital assets.

Net cash provided by financing activities in the first half of 2010 was $101.0 million higher than the first half of 2009. This was due primarily to net borrowings under our credit facility in 2010 to complete the acquisition of Custom Direct, as well as payments in 2009 of $21.2 million to retire long-term notes and $2.7 million to repay amounts borrowed on our line of credit.

Significant cash inflows, excluding those related to operating activities, for each period were as follows:


	Six Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands)	2010		2009		Change

Net proceeds from short-term debt	$	73,000	$	—	$	73,000
Proceeds from life insurance policies		5,782		—		5,782
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities		1,970		—		1,970
Proceeds from issuing shares under employee plans		1,600		1,042		558

Significant cash outflows, excluding those related to operating activities, for each period were as follows:


	Six Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands)	2010		2009		Change

Payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired	$	98,621	$	—	$	98,621
Cash dividends paid to shareholders		25,696		25,621		75
Purchases of capital assets		21,066		23,737		(2,671	)
Payments for debt issue costs, credit facility		2,324		—		2,324
Payments on long-term debt		—		22,134		(22,134	)
Net payments on short-term debt		—		2,743		(2,743	)
Payments for common shares repurchased		—		1,319		(1,319	)

We anticipate that net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations will be between $220 million and $230 million in 2010, compared to $206 million in 2009. We anticipate that the increase will be driven by the third quarter contract settlement discussed under Executive Overview, cash flow generated by the Custom Direct acquisition, stronger earnings, continued progress on working capital initiatives and lower contract acquisition payments. We expect that these increases will be partly offset by higher performance-based compensation payments for all employee levels in 2010. We anticipate that cash generated by operating activities in 2010 will be utilized for dividend payments of approximately $50 million, capital expenditures of approximately $40 million, debt reduction, and possibly additional small-to-medium-sized acquisitions. We intend to focus our capital spending on expanding our use of digital printing technology, completing the automation of our flat check packaging process and investing in order fulfillment, delivery productivity and information technology infrastructure. We have no maturities of long-term debt until December 2012. We executed a $200.0 million credit facility during the first quarter of 2010 and we had $91.7 million available for borrowing under this credit facility as of June 30, 2010. We believe our credit facility, along with cash generated by operating activities, will be sufficient to support our operations, including capital expenditures, possible small-to-medium-sized acquisitions, required debt service and dividend payments, for the next 12 months.

CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our total debt was $846.5 million as of June 30, 2010, an increase of $77.8 million from December 31, 2009. Our capital structure for each period was as follows:


	June 30, 2010					December 31, 2009
			Weighted-					Weighted-
			average interest					average interest
(in thousands)	Amount		rate			Amount		rate			Change

Fixed interest rate	$	533,450		6.0	%	$	533,399		6.0	%	$	51
Floating interest rate		313,063		3.7	%		235,354		3.0	%		77,709

Total debt		846,513		5.3	%		768,753		5.1	%		77,760
Shareholders’ equity		162,951					117,210					45,741

Total capital	$	1,009,464				$	885,963				$	123,501

During September 2009, we entered into interest rate swaps with a notional amount of $210.0 million to hedge a portion of our notes due in 2012. The carrying amount of long-term debt increased $4.4 million since the inception of the interest rate swaps due to changes in the fair value of the hedged long-term debt. Further information concerning the interest rate swaps and our outstanding debt can be found under the captions “Note 4: Derivative financial instruments” and “Note 11: Debt” of the Condensed Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in Item 1 of this report.

We have an outstanding authorization from our board of directors to purchase up to 10 million shares of our common stock. This authorization has no expiration date, and 6.4 million shares remained available for purchase under this authorization as of June 30, 2010. We did not repurchase any shares during the first half of 2010. Information regarding changes in shareholders’ equity appears under the caption “Note 13: Shareholders equity” of the Condensed Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in Item 1 of this report.

We may, from time to time, consider retiring outstanding debt through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Any such repurchases or exchanges would depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements and other potential uses of cash, including acquisitions or share repurchases.


(in thousands)	Total available

Credit facility commitment	$	200,000
Amounts drawn on credit facility		(99,000	)
Outstanding letters of credit		(9,313	)

Net available for borrowing as of June 30, 2010	$	91,687

OTHER FINANCIAL POSITION INFORMATION

Contract acquisition costs – Other non-current assets include contract acquisition costs of our Financial Services segment. These costs, which are essentially pre-paid product discounts, are recorded as non-current assets upon contract execution and are amortized, generally on the straight-line basis, as reductions of revenue over the related contract term. Cash payments made for contract acquisition costs were $10.7 million for the first half of 2010 and $15.5 million for the first half of 2009. We anticipate cash payments of approximately $15 million in 2010. Changes in contract acquisition costs during the first half of 2010 and 2009 were as follows:


	Six Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands)	2010			2009

Balance, beginning of year	$	45,701		$	37,706
Additions⁽¹⁾		21,728			30,556
Amortization		(9,803	)		(12,460	)
Write-off		(143	)		—

Balance, end of period	$	57,483		$	55,802


⁽¹⁾		Contract acquisition costs are accrued upon contract execution. Cash payments made for contract acquisition costs were $10,689 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and $15,456 for the six months ended June 30, 2009.

The number of checks being written has been in decline since the mid-1990s, which has contributed to increased competitive pressure when attempting to retain or acquire clients. Both the number of financial institution clients requesting contract acquisition payments and the amount of the payments increased in the mid-2000s, and has fluctuated significantly from year to year. Although we anticipate that we will selectively continue to make contract acquisition payments, we cannot quantify future amounts with certainty. The amount paid depends on numerous factors such as the number and timing of contract executions and renewals, competitors’ actions, overall product discount levels and the structure of up-front product discount payments versus providing higher discount levels throughout the term of the contract. When the overall discount level provided for in a contract is unchanged, contract acquisition costs do not result in lower net revenue. These payments impact the timing of cash flows. An up-front cash payment is made rather than providing higher product discount levels throughout the term of the contract. Information regarding the recoverability of contract acquisition costs appears under the caption “Note 15: Market risks” of the Condensed Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in Item 1 of this report.

Liabilities for contract acquisition payments are recorded upon contract execution. These obligations are monitored for each contract and are adjusted as payments are made. Contract acquisition payments due within the next year are included in accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. These accruals were $9.6 million as of June 30, 2010 and $2.8 million as of December 31, 2009. Accruals for contract acquisition payments included in other non-current liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets were $10.2 million as of June 30, 2010 and $6.0 million as of December 31, 2009.

Funds held for customers – Funds held for customers of $40.0 million as of June 30, 2010 increased $13.1 million from December 31, 2009. The increase in funds held for customers, and the corresponding accrued liability, was due primarily to the timing of the end of the quarter relative to the timing of customer payroll disbursements.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS, GUARANTEES AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

It is not our general business practice to enter into off-balance sheet arrangements or to guarantee the performance of third parties. In the normal course of business we periodically enter into agreements that incorporate general indemnification language. These indemnifications encompass such items as product or service defects, including breach of security, intellectual property rights, governmental regulations and/or employment-related matters. Performance under these indemnities would generally be triggered by our breach of terms of the contract. In disposing of assets or businesses, we often provide representations, warranties and/or indemnities to cover various risks, including, for example, unknown damage to the assets, environmental risks involved in the sale of real estate, liability to investigate and remediate environmental contamination at waste disposal sites and manufacturing facilities, and unidentified tax liabilities and legal fees related to periods prior to disposition. We do not have the ability to estimate the potential liability from such indemnities because they relate to unknown conditions. However, we have no reason to believe that any likely liability under these indemnities would

have a material adverse effect on our financial position, annual results of operations or annual cash flows. We have recorded liabilities for known indemnifications related to environmental matters. Further information can be found under the caption “Note 14: Other commitments and contingencies” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in Item 8 of the 2009 Form 10-K.

We are not engaged in any transactions, arrangements or other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other third parties that are reasonably likely to have a material effect on our liquidity or on our access to, or requirements for, capital resources. In addition, we have not established any special purpose entities.

A table of our contractual obligations was provided in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of the 2009 Form 10-K. There were no significant changes in these obligations during the first half of 2010.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

We have not entered into any material related party transactions during the six months ended June 30, 2010 or during 2009.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

A description of our critical accounting policies was provided in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of the 2009 Form 10-K. There were no changes in these policies during the first half of 2010.

NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Information regarding the accounting pronouncements adopted during the first quarter of 2010 can be found under the caption “Note 2: New accounting pronouncements” of the Condensed Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements appearing in Item 1 of this report.

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. This guidance requires new disclosures and clarifies some existing disclosure requirements regarding fair value measurements. The disclosure required under this guidance regarding purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the rollforward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements will be effective for our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2011.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the Reform Act) provides a “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements to encourage companies to provide prospective information. We are filing this cautionary statement in connection with the Reform Act. When we use the words or phrases “should result,” “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” “are expected to,” “targeted,” “will continue,” “will approximate,” “is anticipated,” “estimate,” “project” or similar expressions in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, in future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in our press releases and in oral statements made by our representatives, they indicate forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Reform Act.

We want to caution you that any forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf are subject to uncertainties and other factors that could cause them to be incorrect. The material uncertainties and other factors known to us are discussed in Item 1A of the 2009 Form 10-K and are incorporated into this Item 2 of this report on Form 10-Q as if fully stated herein. Although we have attempted to compile a comprehensive list of these important factors, we want to caution you that other factors may prove to be important in affecting future operating results. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of these factors, nor can we assess the impact each factor or combination of factors may have on our business.

You are further cautioned not to place undue reliance on those forward-looking statements because they speak only of our views as of the date the statements were made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We are exposed to changes in interest rates primarily as a result of the borrowing activities used to support our capital structure, maintain liquidity and fund business operations. We do not enter into financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. During the first half of 2010, we used our credit facilities to fund working capital, acquisitions and debt service requirements. The nature and amount of debt outstanding can be expected to vary as a result of future business requirements, market conditions and other factors. As of June 30, 2010, our total debt was comprised of the following:


					Weighted-
					average
	Carrying		Fair		interest
(in thousands)	amount		value⁽¹⁾		rate

Long-term notes maturing December 2012	$	284,264	$	280,627		3.83	%
Long-term notes maturing October 2014		263,249		252,301		5.13	%
Long-term notes maturing June 2015		200,000		199,060		7.38	%
Amounts drawn on credit facility		99,000		99,000		3.39	%

Total debt	$	846,513	$	830,988		5.34	%


⁽¹⁾		Based on quoted market prices as of June 30, 2010 for identical liabilities when traded as assets, with the exception of amounts drawn on our credit facility for which fair value equals carrying value due to its short-term nature.

We may, from time to time, retire outstanding debt through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Any such repurchases or exchanges would depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements and other potential uses of cash, including acquisitions or share repurchases.

In September 2009, we entered into interest rate swaps with a notional amount of $210.0 million to hedge against changes in the fair value of a portion of our ten-year bonds due in 2012. We entered into these swaps, which we designated as fair value hedges, to achieve a targeted mix of fixed and variable rate debt, where we receive a fixed rate and pay a variable rate based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps and the related long-term debt are included in interest expense in the consolidated statements of income. When the changes in fair value of the interest rate swaps and the hedged debt are not equal (i.e., hedge ineffectiveness), the difference in the changes in fair value affects the reported amount of interest expense in our consolidated statements of income. Hedge ineffectiveness was not significant for the quarter or six months ended June 30, 2010. The fair value of the interest rate swaps as of June 30, 2010 was $4.8 million and is included in other non-current assets on the consolidated balance sheet. Based on the outstanding variable rate debt in our portfolio, a one percentage point change in interest rates would have resulted in a $1.3 million change in interest expense for the first half of 2010, excluding the impact of the interest rate swaps.

We are exposed to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Investments in, loans and advances to foreign subsidiaries and branches, as well as the operations of these businesses, are denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the Canadian dollar. The effect of exchange rate changes is expected to have a minimal impact on our results of operations and cash flows, as our foreign operations represent a relatively small portion of our business.

See Business Challenges/Market Risks in Item 2 of this report for further discussion of market risks.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures — As of the end of the period covered by this report (the “Evaluation Date”), we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “1934 Act”)). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicable rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b) Internal Control Over Financial Reporting — There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with our evaluation during the quarter ended June 30, 2010, which have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II-OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

We record provisions with respect to identified claims or lawsuits when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Claims and lawsuits are reviewed quarterly and provisions are taken or adjusted to reflect the status of a particular matter. We believe the recorded reserves in our consolidated financial statements are adequate in light of the probable and estimable outcomes. Recorded liabilities were not material to our financial position, results of operations and liquidity, and we do not believe that any of the currently identified claims or litigation will materially affect our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Our risk factors are outlined in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “2009 Form 10-K”). There have been no significant changes to these risk factors since we filed the 2009 Form 10-K.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

While not considered repurchases of shares, we do at times withhold shares that would otherwise be issued under equity-based awards to cover the withholding taxes due as a result of the exercising or vesting of such awards. During the second quarter of 2010, we withheld 2,806 shares in conjunction with the vesting and exercise of equity-based awards.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

Item 6. Exhibits.


Exhibit			Method of
Number		Description	Filing
	2.1	Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 17, 2004, by and among us, Hudson Acquisition Corporation and New England Business Service, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (d)(1) to the Deluxe Corporation Schedule TO-T filed with the Commission on May 25, 2004)	*

	2.2	Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 18, 2008, by and among us, Deluxe Business Operations, Inc., Helix Merger Corp. and Hostopia.com Inc. (excluding schedules which we agree to furnish to the Commission upon request) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 23, 2008)	*

	3.1	Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1990)	*

	3.2	Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October 23, 2008)	*

	4.1	Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2006, by and between us and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Rights Agent, which includes as Exhibit A thereto, the Form of Rights Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December 21, 2006)	*

	4.2	First Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 4, 2002, by and between us and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A. (formerly Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association), as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December 5, 2002)	*

	4.3	Indenture, dated as of April 30, 2003, by and between us and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A. (formerly Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association), as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-104858) filed with the Commission on April 30, 2003)	*

	4.4	Form of Officer’s Certificate and Company Order authorizing the 2014 Notes, series B (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-120381) filed with the Commission on November 12, 2004)	*

	4.5	Specimen of 5 1/8% notes due 2014, series B (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-120381) filed with the Commission on November 12, 2004)	*

	4.6	Indenture, dated as of May 14, 2007, by and between us and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including form of 7.375% Senior Notes due 2015) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 15, 2007)	*


Exhibit			Method of
Number		Description	Filing
	4.7	Registration Rights Agreement, dated May 14, 2007, by and between us and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., as representative of the several initial purchasers listed in Schedule I to the Purchase Agreement related to the 7.375% Senior Notes due 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 15, 2007)	*

	4.8	Specimen of 7.375% Senior Notes due 2015 (included in Exhibit 4.6)	*

	4.9	Revolving credit agreement dated as of March 12, 2010, among us, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as administrative agent, Fifth Third Bank as Syndication Agent, U.S. Bank National Association and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. as co-documentation agents, and the other financial institutions party thereto, related to a $200,000,000 three-year revolving credit agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 15, 2010)	*

	12.1	Statement re: Computation of Ratios	Filed herewith

	31.1	CEO Certification of Periodic Report pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed herewith

	31.2	CFO Certification of Periodic Report pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed herewith

	32.1	CEO and CFO Certification of Periodic Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Furnished herewith

	101	Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, and (iv) Condensed Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text**	Furnished herewith


*		Incorporated by reference

**		Submitted electronically with this report

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	DELUXE CORPORATION (Registrant)
Date: August 5, 2010	/s/ Lee Schram
	Lee Schram
	Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


Date: August 5, 2010	/s/ Terry D. Peterson
	Terry D. Peterson
	Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

INDEX TO EXHIBITS


Exhibit No.		Description
12.1		Statement re: Computation of Ratios

31.1		CEO Certification of Periodic Report pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2		CFO Certification of Periodic Report pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1		CEO and CFO Certification of Periodic Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101		Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, and (iv) Condensed Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text

Description

Purchase Agreement, dated September 28, 2004, by and among us and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, as representatives of the several initial purchasers listed in Schedule 1 of the Purchase Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October 4, 2004)