e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended
September 30,
2010
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to .
|
Commission file
no. 001-13831
Quanta Services, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
74-2851603
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
1360 Post
Oak Blvd.
Suite 2100
Houston, Texas 77056
(Address
of principal executive offices, including zip
code)
(Registrants
telephone number, including area code)
(713) 629-7600
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer þ
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
211,170,379 shares of Common Stock were outstanding as of
November 2, 2010. As of the same date, 432,485 shares
of Limited Vote Common Stock were outstanding.
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
441,247
|
|
|
$
|
699,629
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $5,769 and $8,119
|
|
|
787,580
|
|
|
|
688,260
|
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on
uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
266,032
|
|
|
|
61,239
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
46,445
|
|
|
|
33,451
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
79,958
|
|
|
|
100,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,621,262
|
|
|
|
1,582,792
|
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of
$407,787 and $383,714
|
|
|
864,279
|
|
|
|
854,437
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
39,317
|
|
|
|
45,345
|
|
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of
$124,501 and $96,167
|
|
|
156,501
|
|
|
|
184,822
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,449,603
|
|
|
|
1,449,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
4,130,962
|
|
|
$
|
4,116,954
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt and notes payable
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
|
$
|
3,426
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
440,877
|
|
|
|
422,034
|
|
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on
uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
63,258
|
|
|
|
70,228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
504,397
|
|
|
|
495,688
|
|
Convertible subordinated notes, net of discount of $0 and $17,142
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
126,608
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
176,879
|
|
|
|
167,575
|
|
Insurance and other non-current liabilities
|
|
|
211,611
|
|
|
|
216,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
892,887
|
|
|
|
1,006,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.00001 par value, 300,000,000 shares
authorized, 213,351,903 and 211,977,811 shares issued and
210,529,056 and 209,378,308 shares outstanding
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Limited Vote Common Stock, $.00001 par value,
3,345,333 shares authorized, 432,485 and
662,293 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,073,955
|
|
|
|
3,065,581
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
195,346
|
|
|
|
75,836
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
5,775
|
|
|
|
3,502
|
|
Treasury stock, 2,822,847 and 2,599,503 common shares, at cost
|
|
|
(39,994
|
)
|
|
|
(35,738
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
3,235,084
|
|
|
|
3,109,183
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
2,991
|
|
|
|
1,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
3,238,075
|
|
|
|
3,110,561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
4,130,962
|
|
|
$
|
4,116,954
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,206,007
|
|
|
$
|
780,794
|
|
|
$
|
2,824,792
|
|
|
$
|
2,332,703
|
|
Cost of services (including depreciation)
|
|
|
1,016,013
|
|
|
|
633,166
|
|
|
|
2,349,619
|
|
|
|
1,930,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
189,994
|
|
|
|
147,628
|
|
|
|
475,173
|
|
|
|
402,541
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
82,037
|
|
|
|
71,018
|
|
|
|
245,163
|
|
|
|
217,591
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
13,396
|
|
|
|
5,448
|
|
|
|
28,334
|
|
|
|
15,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
94,561
|
|
|
|
71,162
|
|
|
|
201,676
|
|
|
|
169,690
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(269
|
)
|
|
|
(2,816
|
)
|
|
|
(4,660
|
)
|
|
|
(8,437
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
1,166
|
|
|
|
2,047
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(7,107
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
479
|
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
95,189
|
|
|
|
69,276
|
|
|
|
191,446
|
|
|
|
164,126
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
31,489
|
|
|
|
5,320
|
|
|
|
70,323
|
|
|
|
45,036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
63,700
|
|
|
|
63,956
|
|
|
|
121,123
|
|
|
|
119,090
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
920
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
1,613
|
|
|
|
873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stock
|
|
$
|
62,780
|
|
|
$
|
63,436
|
|
|
$
|
119,510
|
|
|
$
|
118,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share attributable to common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.57
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.57
|
|
|
$
|
0.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average basic shares outstanding
|
|
|
209,428
|
|
|
|
198,608
|
|
|
|
209,125
|
|
|
|
198,618
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding
|
|
|
211,096
|
|
|
|
205,224
|
|
|
|
210,798
|
|
|
|
198,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
63,700
|
|
|
$
|
63,956
|
|
|
$
|
121,123
|
|
|
$
|
119,090
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
26,502
|
|
|
|
20,574
|
|
|
|
80,377
|
|
|
|
60,537
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
13,396
|
|
|
|
5,448
|
|
|
|
28,334
|
|
|
|
15,260
|
|
Non-cash interest expense
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
|
|
1,704
|
|
|
|
3,218
|
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
691
|
|
Amortization of deferred revenues
|
|
|
(2,733
|
)
|
|
|
(3,397
|
)
|
|
|
(9,702
|
)
|
|
|
(10,316
|
)
|
Loss on sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
3,287
|
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
4,164
|
|
|
|
1,518
|
|
Non-cash loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
4,797
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Foreign currency (gain) loss
|
|
|
(368
|
)
|
|
|
(634
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(634
|
)
|
Provision for (recovery of) doubtful accounts, net
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
(788
|
)
|
|
|
2,088
|
|
Deferred income tax provision
|
|
|
21,129
|
|
|
|
28,764
|
|
|
|
27,052
|
|
|
|
33,346
|
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation
|
|
|
5,703
|
|
|
|
4,969
|
|
|
|
17,465
|
|
|
|
14,635
|
|
Tax impact of stock-based equity awards
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
(1,970
|
)
|
|
|
1,593
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of non-cash
transactions (Increase) decrease in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable
|
|
|
(113,914
|
)
|
|
|
75,205
|
|
|
|
(94,145
|
)
|
|
|
136,158
|
|
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on
uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
(137,845
|
)
|
|
|
(12,560
|
)
|
|
|
(204,598
|
)
|
|
|
(7,096
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(5,693
|
)
|
|
|
(3,391
|
)
|
|
|
(12,928
|
)
|
|
|
(5,545
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(8,568
|
)
|
|
|
(9,760
|
)
|
|
|
3,927
|
|
|
|
(7,496
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses and other non-current
liabilities
|
|
|
59,853
|
|
|
|
(48,792
|
)
|
|
|
21,687
|
|
|
|
(78,886
|
)
|
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on
uncompleted contracts
|
|
|
20,318
|
|
|
|
(15,284
|
)
|
|
|
(6,976
|
)
|
|
|
540
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
614
|
|
|
|
(1,378
|
)
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(54,707
|
)
|
|
|
107,959
|
|
|
|
(21,332
|
)
|
|
|
278,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
7,147
|
|
|
|
2,075
|
|
|
|
21,254
|
|
|
|
4,779
|
|
Additions of property and equipment
|
|
|
(31,674
|
)
|
|
|
(36,012
|
)
|
|
|
(114,044
|
)
|
|
|
(120,852
|
)
|
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(14,148
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(14,148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(24,527
|
)
|
|
|
(48,085
|
)
|
|
|
(92,790
|
)
|
|
|
(130,221
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from other long-term debt
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2,218
|
|
Payments on other long-term debt
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
(3,397
|
)
|
|
|
(3,376
|
)
|
Payments on convertible notes
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(143,750
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
Tax impact of stock-based equity awards
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
1,970
|
|
|
|
(1,593
|
)
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
613
|
|
|
|
(144,721
|
)
|
|
|
(2,105
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
|
(805
|
)
|
|
|
461
|
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(78,571
|
)
|
|
|
59,682
|
|
|
|
(258,382
|
)
|
|
|
146,137
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
519,818
|
|
|
|
524,356
|
|
|
|
699,629
|
|
|
|
437,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
441,247
|
|
|
$
|
584,038
|
|
|
$
|
441,247
|
|
|
$
|
584,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash (paid) received during the period for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
(149
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,037
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,346
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,931
|
)
|
Redemption premium on convertible subordinated notes
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
(2,310
|
)
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
$
|
(24,617
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,264
|
)
|
|
$
|
(90,293
|
)
|
|
$
|
(38,405
|
)
|
Income tax refunds
|
|
$
|
2,266
|
|
|
$
|
791
|
|
|
$
|
8,152
|
|
|
$
|
2,160
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed
consolidated financial statements.
4
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Unaudited)
|
|
1.
|
BUSINESS
AND ORGANIZATION:
|
Quanta Services, Inc. (Quanta) is a leading national provider of
specialized contracting services, offering infrastructure
solutions to the electric power, natural gas, oil and
telecommunications industries. Quanta reports its results under
four reportable segments: (1) Electric Power Infrastructure
Services, (2) Natural Gas and Pipeline Infrastructure
Services, (3) Telecommunications Infrastructure Services
and (4) Fiber Optic Licensing.
Electric
Power Infrastructure Services Segment
The Electric Power Infrastructure Services segment provides
comprehensive network solutions to customers in the electric
power industry. Services performed by the Electric Power
Infrastructure Services segment generally include the design,
installation, upgrade, repair and maintenance of electric power
transmission and distribution networks and substation facilities
along with other engineering and technical services. This
segment also provides emergency restoration services, including
repairing infrastructure damaged by inclement weather, the
energized installation, maintenance and upgrade of electric
power infrastructure utilizing unique bare hand and hot stick
methods and our proprietary robotic arm technologies, and the
installation of smart grid technologies on electric
power networks. In addition, this segment designs, installs and
maintains wind turbine facilities and solar arrays and related
switchyards and transmission networks for renewable power
generation sources. To a lesser extent, this segment provides
services such as the design, installation, maintenance and
repair of commercial and industrial wiring, installation of
traffic networks and the installation of cable and control
systems for light rail lines.
Natural
Gas and Pipeline Infrastructure Services Segment
The Natural Gas and Pipeline Infrastructure Services segment
provides comprehensive network solutions to customers involved
in the transportation of natural gas, oil and other pipeline
products. Services performed by the Natural Gas and Pipeline
Infrastructure Services segment generally include the design,
installation, repair and maintenance of natural gas and oil
transmission and distribution systems, compressor and pump
stations and gas gathering systems, as well as related
trenching, directional boring and automatic welding services. In
addition, this segments services include pipeline
protection, pipeline integrity and rehabilitation and
fabrication of pipeline support systems and related structures
and facilities. This segment also provides emergency restoration
services, including repairing natural gas and oil pipeline
infrastructure damaged by inclement weather. To a lesser extent,
this segment designs, installs and maintains airport fueling
systems as well as water and sewer infrastructure.
Telecommunications
Infrastructure Services Segment
The Telecommunications Infrastructure Services segment provides
comprehensive network solutions to customers in the
telecommunications and cable television industries. Services
performed by the Telecommunications Infrastructure Services
segment generally include the design, installation, repair and
maintenance of fiber optic, copper and coaxial cable networks
used for video, data and voice transmission, as well as the
design and installation of wireless communications towers and
switching systems. This segment also provides emergency
restoration services, including repairing telecommunications
infrastructure damaged by inclement weather. To a lesser extent,
services provided under this segment include cable locating,
splicing and testing of fiber optic networks and residential
installation of fiber optic cabling.
Fiber
Optic Licensing Segment
The Fiber Optic Licensing segment designs, procures, constructs
and maintains fiber optic telecommunications infrastructure in
select markets and licenses the right to use these
point-to-point
fiber optic telecommunications facilities to its customers
pursuant to licensing agreements, typically with lease terms
from five to twenty-five years, inclusive of certain renewal
options. Under those agreements, customers are provided the
right to use a portion of the capacity of a fiber optic
facility, with the facility owned and maintained by Quanta. The
Fiber Optic
5
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Licensing segment provides services to enterprise, education,
carrier, financial services and healthcare customers and other
entities with high bandwidth telecommunication needs. The
telecommunication services provided through this segment are
subject to regulation by the Federal Communications Commission
and certain state public utility commissions.
Acquisitions
On October 1, 2009, Quanta acquired Price Gregory Services,
Incorporated (Price Gregory). In connection with the
acquisition, Quanta issued approximately 10.9 million
shares of Quanta common stock valued at approximately
$231.8 million and paid approximately $95.8 million in
cash to the stockholders of Price Gregory. As the transaction
was effective October 1, 2009, the results of Price Gregory
have been included in the consolidated financial statements
beginning on such date. Price Gregory provides natural gas and
oil transmission pipeline infrastructure services in North
America, specializing in the construction of large diameter
transmission pipelines. Price Gregorys financial results
have been and will generally be included in Quantas
Natural Gas and Pipeline Infrastructure Services segment.
At various times during 2009, Quanta acquired three other
businesses that predominately provide electric power and
telecommunications services, and the results for such businesses
are reflected in Quantas consolidated financial statements
as of their respective acquisition dates. These acquisitions
allow Quanta to further expand its capabilities and scope of
services in various locations around the United States.
On October 25, 2010, Quanta acquired Valard Construction LP
and certain of its affiliated entities (Valard),
an electric power infrastructure services company based in
Alberta, Canada. In connection with the acquisition, Quanta paid
the shareholders of Valard approximately $118.9 million in
cash and issued an aggregate of approximately 4.5 million
in Quanta common shares and exchangeable shares of a Canadian
subsidiary of Quanta valued at approximately $88.5 million.
The exchangeable shares are substantially equivalent to, and
exchangeable on a
one-for-one
basis for, Quanta common shares. On the date of the acquisition,
Quanta also repaid approximately $12.5 million in Valard
debt. This acquisition allows Quanta to further expand its
capabilities and scope of services in Canada.
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
|
Principles
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements of Quanta include the
accounts of Quanta and its wholly owned subsidiaries, which are
also referred to as its operating units. The consolidated
financial statements also include the accounts of certain of
Quantas investments in joint ventures, which are either
consolidated or partially consolidated, as discussed in the
following summary of significant accounting policies. All
significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation. Unless the context requires
otherwise, references to Quanta include Quanta and its
consolidated subsidiaries.
Interim
Condensed Consolidated Financial Information
These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have
been prepared pursuant to the rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC). Certain information and footnote
disclosures, normally included in annual financial statements
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States, have been condensed or omitted
pursuant to those rules and regulations. Quanta believes that
the disclosures made are adequate to make the information
presented not misleading. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments,
necessary to fairly state the financial position, results of
operations and cash flows with respect to the interim
consolidated financial statements have been included. The
results of operations for the interim periods are not
necessarily indicative of the results for the entire fiscal
year. The results of Quanta have historically been subject to
significant seasonal fluctuations.
6
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Quanta recommends that these unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements be read in conjunction with the audited
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of Quanta
and its subsidiaries included in Quantas Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, which was filed with
the SEC on March 1, 2010.
Use of
Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires the use of estimates and assumptions by management in
determining the reported amounts of assets and liabilities,
disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities known to exist
as of the date the financial statements are published and the
reported amount of revenues and expenses recognized during the
periods presented. Quanta reviews all significant estimates
affecting its consolidated financial statements on a recurring
basis and records the effect of any necessary adjustments prior
to their publication. Judgments and estimates are based on
Quantas beliefs and assumptions derived from information
available at the time such judgments and estimates are made.
Uncertainties with respect to such estimates and assumptions are
inherent in the preparation of financial statements. Estimates
are primarily used in Quantas assessment of the allowance
for doubtful accounts, valuation of inventory, useful lives of
assets, fair value assumptions in analyzing goodwill, other
intangibles and long-lived asset impairments, valuation of
derivative contracts, purchase price allocations, liabilities
for self-insured claims, convertible debt, revenue recognition
for construction contracts and fiber optic licensing,
share-based compensation, operating results of reportable
segments, provision for income taxes and the calculation of
uncertain tax positions.
Cash and
Cash Equivalents
Quanta had cash and cash equivalents of $441.2 million and
$699.6 million as of September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009. Cash consisting of interest-bearing
demand deposits is carried at cost, which approximates fair
value. Quanta considers all highly liquid investments purchased
with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash
equivalents, which are carried at fair value. At
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, cash
equivalents were $403.4 million and $636.8 million,
which consisted primarily of money market mutual funds and
investment grade commercial paper and are discussed further in
Fair Value Measurements below. As of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, cash and
cash equivalents held in domestic bank accounts was
approximately $432.4 million and $669.8 million and
cash and cash equivalents held in foreign bank accounts was
approximately $8.8 million and $29.8 million.
Current
and Long-term Accounts and Notes Receivable and Allowance for
Doubtful Accounts
Quanta provides an allowance for doubtful accounts when
collection of an account or note receivable is considered
doubtful, and receivables are written off against the allowance
when deemed uncollectible. Inherent in the assessment of the
allowance for doubtful accounts are certain judgments and
estimates including, among others, the customers access to
capital, the customers willingness or ability to pay,
general economic and market conditions and the ongoing
relationship with the customer. Under certain circumstances such
as foreclosures or negotiated settlements, Quanta may take title
to the underlying assets in lieu of cash in settlement of
receivables. Material changes in Quantas customers
business or cash flows, which may be further impacted by the
continuing economic downturn and weakness in the markets, could
affect its ability to collect amounts due from them. As of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, Quanta had
total allowances for doubtful accounts of approximately
$5.8 million and $8.1 million. Should customers
experience financial difficulties or file for bankruptcy, or
should anticipated recoveries relating to receivables in
existing bankruptcies or other workout situations fail to
materialize, Quanta could experience reduced cash flows and
losses in excess of current allowances provided.
The balances billed but not paid by customers pursuant to
retainage provisions in certain contracts will be due upon
completion of the contracts and acceptance by the customer.
Based on Quantas experience with similar
7
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
contracts in recent years, the majority of the retention
balances at each balance sheet date will be collected within the
next twelve months. Current retainage balances as of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were
approximately $90.3 million and $152.1 million and are
included in accounts receivable. Retainage balances with
settlement dates beyond the next twelve months are included in
other assets, net, and as of September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 were $1.9 million and
$2.4 million.
Within accounts receivable, Quanta recognizes unbilled
receivables in circumstances such as when: revenues have been
earned and recorded but the amount cannot be billed under the
terms of the contract until a later date; costs have been
incurred but are yet to be billed under cost-reimbursement type
contracts; or amounts arise from routine lags in billing (for
example, work completed one month but not billed until the next
month). These balances do not include revenues accrued for work
performed under fixed-price contracts as these amounts are
recorded as costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings
on uncompleted contracts. At September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, the balances of unbilled receivables
included in accounts receivable were approximately
$128.7 million and $96.9 million.
Goodwill
and Other Intangibles
Quanta has recorded goodwill in connection with its
acquisitions. Goodwill is subject to an annual assessment for
impairment using a two-step fair value-based test, which Quanta
performs at the operating unit level. Each of Quantas
operating units is organized into one of three internal
divisions, which are closely aligned with Quantas
reportable segments, based on the predominant type of work
performed by the operating unit at the point in time the
divisional designation is made. Because separate measures of
assets and cash flows are not produced or utilized by management
to evaluate segment performance, Quantas impairment
assessments of its goodwill do not include any consideration of
assets and cash flows by reportable segment. As a result, Quanta
has determined that its individual operating units represent its
reporting units for the purpose of assessing goodwill
impairments.
Quantas goodwill impairment assessment is performed
annually at year-end, or more frequently if events or
circumstances exist which indicate that goodwill may be
impaired. For instance, a decrease in Quantas market
capitalization below book value, a significant change in
business climate or a loss of a significant customer, among
other things, may trigger the need for interim impairment
testing of goodwill associated with one or all of its reporting
units. The first step of the two-step fair value-based test
involves comparing the fair value of each of Quantas
reporting units with its carrying value, including goodwill. If
the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value,
the second step is performed. The second step compares the
carrying amount of the reporting units goodwill to the
implied fair value of its goodwill. If the implied fair value of
goodwill is less than the carrying amount, an impairment loss
would be recorded as a reduction to goodwill with a
corresponding charge to operating expense.
Quanta determines the fair value of its reporting units using a
weighted combination of the discounted cash flow, market
multiple and market capitalization valuation approaches, with
heavier weighting on the discounted cash flow method, as in
managements opinion, this method currently results in the
most accurate calculation of a reporting units fair value.
Determining the fair value of a reporting unit requires judgment
and the use of significant estimates and assumptions. Such
estimates and assumptions include revenue growth rates,
operating margins, discount rates, weighted average costs of
capital and future market conditions, among others. Quanta
believes the estimates and assumptions used in its impairment
assessments are reasonable and based on available market
information, but variations in any of the assumptions could
result in materially different calculations of fair value and
determinations of whether or not an impairment is indicated.
Under the discounted cash flow method, Quanta determines fair
value based on the estimated future cash flows of each reporting
unit, discounted to present value using risk-adjusted industry
discount rates, which reflect the overall level of inherent risk
of a reporting unit and the rate of return an outside investor
would expect to earn. Cash flow projections are derived from
budgeted amounts and operating forecasts (typically a three-year
model) plus an estimate of later period cash flows, all of which
are evaluated by management. Subsequent period cash flows are
8
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
developed for each reporting unit using growth rates that
management believes are reasonably likely to occur along with a
terminal value derived from the reporting units earnings
before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA).
The EBITDA multiples for each reporting unit are based on
trailing twelve-month comparable industry data.
Under the market multiple and market capitalization approaches,
Quanta determines the estimated fair value of each of its
reporting units by applying transaction multiples to each
reporting units projected EBITDA and then averaging that
estimate with similar historical calculations using either a
one, two or three year average. For the market capitalization
approach, Quanta adds a reasonable control premium, which is
estimated as the premium that would be received in a sale of the
reporting unit in an orderly transaction between market
participants.
For recently acquired reporting units, a step one impairment
test may not indicate an implied fair value that is
substantially different from the reporting units carrying
value. Such similarities in value are generally an indication
that managements estimates of future cash flows associated
with the recently acquired reporting unit remain relatively
consistent with the assumptions that were used to derive its
initial fair value. During the fourth quarter of 2009, a
goodwill impairment analysis was performed for each of
Quantas operating units, which indicated that the implied
fair value of each of Quantas operating units was
substantially in excess of carrying value except for one
recently acquired operating unit for which the implied fair
value approximated its carrying value. Following the analysis,
management concluded that no impairment was indicated at any
operating unit. As discussed generally above, when evaluating
the 2009 step one impairment test results, management considered
many factors in determining whether or not an impairment of
goodwill for any reporting unit was reasonably likely to occur
in future periods, including future market conditions and the
economic environment in which Quantas reporting units were
operating. As of September 30, 2010, there were no known
factors that would indicate the need for an interim impairment
assessment at any of Quantas reporting units; however,
circumstances such as continued market declines, the loss of a
major customer or other factors could impact the valuation of
goodwill in future periods.
Quantas intangible assets include customer relationships,
backlog, trade names, non-compete agreements and patented rights
and developed technology. The value of customer relationships is
estimated using the
value-in-use
concept utilizing the income approach, specifically the excess
earnings method. The excess earnings analysis consists of
discounting to present value the projected cash flows
attributable to the customer relationships, with consideration
given to customer contract renewals, the importance or lack
thereof of existing customer relationships to Quantas
business plan, income taxes and required rates of return. Quanta
values backlog based upon the contractual nature of the backlog
within each service line, using the income approach to discount
back to present value the cash flows attributable to the
backlog. The value of trade names is estimated using the
relief-from-royalty method of the income approach. This approach
is based on the assumption that in lieu of ownership, a company
would be willing to pay a royalty in order to exploit the
related benefits of this intangible asset.
Quanta amortizes intangible assets based upon the estimated
consumption of the economic benefits of each intangible asset or
on a straight-line basis if the pattern of economic benefits
consumption cannot otherwise be reliably estimated. Intangible
assets subject to amortization are reviewed for impairment and
are tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be
recoverable. For instance, a significant change in business
climate or a loss of a significant customer, among other things,
may trigger the need for interim impairment testing of
intangible assets. An impairment loss would be recognized if the
carrying amount of an intangible asset is not recoverable and
its carrying amount exceeds its fair value.
Investments
in Joint Ventures
Quanta has an investment in a joint venture that provides
infrastructure services, including the design, installation and
maintenance of electric transmission and distribution systems in
the northeast United States, under a contract awarded by a large
utility customer. The joint venture members each own equal
equity interests in the joint venture. Quanta has determined
that the joint venture is a variable interest entity, with
Quanta providing the majority of the subcontractor services to
the joint venture, which management believes most significantly
9
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
influences the economic performance of the joint venture. As a
result, Quanta has determined that it is the primary beneficiary
of the joint venture and has accounted for the results of the
joint venture on a consolidated basis. The other partys
equity interest in the joint venture has been accounted for as a
noncontrolling interest as of September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 and for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009. Notes 8 and 10 contain
further disclosures related to this variable interest entity.
One of Quantas operating units operates under the terms of
an unincorporated joint venture that provides joint engineering
and construction services for the design and installation of
fuel storage facilities under a contract for a specific
customer. The joint venture is a general partnership, and the
joint venture partners each own an equal equity interest in the
joint venture and participate equally in the profits and losses
of the entity. Quanta has determined that its investment in this
joint venture partnership represents an undivided 50% interest
in the assets, liabilities, revenues and profits of the joint
venture, and such amounts have been proportionally consolidated
in the accompanying financial statements.
Revenue
Recognition
Infrastructure Services Through its Electric Power
Infrastructure Services, Natural Gas and Pipeline Infrastructure
Services and Telecommunications Infrastructure Services
segments, Quanta designs, installs and maintains networks for
customers in the electric power, natural gas and oil,
telecommunications and cable television industries. These
services may be provided pursuant to master service agreements,
repair and maintenance contracts and fixed price and non-fixed
price installation contracts. Pricing under these contracts may
be competitive unit price, cost-plus/hourly (or time and
materials basis) or fixed price (or lump sum basis), and the
final terms and prices of these contracts are frequently
negotiated with the customer. Under unit-based contracts, the
utilization of an output-based measurement is appropriate for
revenue recognition. Under these contracts, Quanta recognizes
revenue as units are completed based on pricing established
between Quanta and the customer for each unit of delivery, which
best reflects the pattern in which the obligation to the
customer is fulfilled. Under cost-plus/hourly and time and
materials type contracts, Quanta recognizes revenue on an
input-basis, as labor hours are incurred and services are
performed.
Revenues from fixed price contracts are recognized using the
percentage-of-completion
method, measured by the percentage of costs incurred to date to
total estimated costs for each contract. These contracts provide
for a fixed amount of revenues for the entire project. Such
contracts provide that the customer accept completion of
progress to date and compensate Quanta for services rendered,
which may be measured in terms of units installed, hours
expended or some other measure of progress. Contract costs
include all direct materials, labor and subcontract costs and
those indirect costs related to contract performance, such as
indirect labor, supplies, tools, repairs and depreciation costs.
Much of the materials associated with Quantas work are
owner-furnished and are therefore not included in contract
revenues and costs. The cost estimation process is based on the
professional knowledge and experience of Quantas
engineers, project managers and financial professionals. Changes
in job performance, job conditions and final contract
settlements are factors that influence managements
assessment of total contract value and the total estimated costs
to complete those contracts and therefore, Quantas profit
recognition. Changes in these factors may result in revisions to
costs and income, and their effects are recognized in the period
in which the revisions are determined. Provisions for losses on
uncompleted contracts are made in the period in which such
losses are determined to be probable and the amount can be
reasonably estimated.
Quanta may incur costs subject to change orders, whether
approved or unapproved by the customer,
and/or
claims related to certain contracts. Quanta determines the
probability that such costs will be recovered based upon
evidence such as past practices with the customer, specific
discussions or preliminary negotiations with the customer or
verbal approvals. Quanta treats items as a cost of contract
performance in the period incurred if it is not probable that
the costs will be recovered or will recognize revenue if it is
probable that the contract price will be adjusted and can be
reliably estimated. As of September 30, 2010, Quanta had
approximately $40.6 million of
10
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
change orders
and/or
claims that had been included as contract price adjustments on
certain contracts which were in the process of being negotiated
in the normal course of business.
The current asset Costs and estimated earnings in excess
of billings on uncompleted contracts represents revenues
recognized in excess of amounts billed for fixed price
contracts. The current liability Billings in excess of
costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts
represents billings in excess of revenues recognized for fixed
price contracts.
Fiber Optic Licensing The Fiber Optic Licensing
segment constructs and licenses the right to use fiber optic
telecommunications facilities to its customers pursuant to
licensing agreements, typically with terms from five to
twenty-five years, inclusive of certain renewal options. Under
those agreements, customers are provided the right to use a
portion of the capacity of a fiber optic facility, with the
facility owned and maintained by Quanta. Revenues, including any
initial fees or advance billings, are recognized ratably over
the expected length of the agreements, including probable
renewal periods. As of September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, initial fees and advance billings on
these licensing agreements not yet recorded in revenue were
$41.8 million and $35.9 million and are recognized as
deferred revenue, with $32.9 million and $25.4 million
considered to be long-term and included in other non-current
liabilities. Minimum future licensing revenues expected to be
recognized by Quanta pursuant to these agreements at
September 30, 2010 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
|
Future
|
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of 2010
|
|
$
|
22,491
|
|
2011
|
|
|
77,637
|
|
2012
|
|
|
64,310
|
|
2013
|
|
|
51,851
|
|
2014
|
|
|
35,858
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
76,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed non-cancelable minimum licensing revenues
|
|
$
|
328,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
Taxes
Quanta follows the liability method of accounting for income
taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities
are recorded for future tax consequences of temporary
differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of
assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax
rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the
underlying assets or liabilities are recovered or settled.
Quanta regularly evaluates valuation allowances established for
deferred tax assets for which future realization is uncertain.
The estimation of required valuation allowances includes
estimates of future taxable income. The ultimate realization of
deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future
taxable income during the periods in which those temporary
differences become deductible. Quanta considers projected future
taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this
assessment. If actual future taxable income differs from these
estimates, Quanta may not realize deferred tax assets to the
extent estimated.
Quanta records reserves for expected tax consequences of
uncertain positions assuming that the taxing authorities have
full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts. As of
September 30, 2010, the total amount of unrecognized tax
benefits relating to uncertain tax positions was
$48.5 million, an increase from December 31, 2009 of
$3.3 million. This increase in unrecognized tax benefits
results from a $7.7 million increase relating to the tax
positions expected to be taken for 2010 and a $4.8 million
increase related to a tax position taken in a 2009 tax
11
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
return that was filed in July 2010, partially offset by a
$9.2 million decrease primarily due to the expiration of
certain statutes of limitations for the 2006 tax year.
Additionally, due to the expiration of certain statutes of
limitations, Quanta reduced previously accrued interest expense
and penalties in the provision for income taxes by recording net
adjustments of $(4.6) million and $(6.4) million for
the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, and net
adjustments of $(2.6) million and $(3.6) million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. Quanta
believes that it is reasonably possible that within the next
12 months unrecognized tax benefits may decrease up to
$9.0 million due to the expiration of certain statutes of
limitations.
The income tax laws and regulations are voluminous and are often
ambiguous. As such, Quanta is required to make many subjective
assumptions and judgments regarding its tax positions that could
materially affect amounts recognized in its future consolidated
balance sheets and statements of operations.
Fair
Value Measurements
The carrying values of cash equivalents, accounts receivable,
accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value due
to the short-term nature of these instruments. For disclosure
purposes, qualifying assets and liabilities are categorized into
three broad levels based on the priority of the inputs used to
determine their fair values. The fair value hierarchy gives the
highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets
for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the
lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). All of
Quantas cash equivalents are categorized as Level 1
assets at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, as
all values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical
assets in an active market that Quanta has the ability to access.
In connection with Quantas acquisition of Price Gregory,
identifiable intangible assets acquired included goodwill,
backlog, customer relationships, trade names and covenants
not-to-compete.
Quanta utilized the fair value premise as the primary basis for
its valuation procedures, which is a market based approach to
determining the price that would be received to sell an asset or
paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants. Quanta engaged the services of an
independent valuation firm to assist management with this
valuation process, which included assistance with the selection
of appropriate valuation methodologies and the development of
market-based valuation assumptions. Based on these
considerations, management utilized various valuation methods,
including an income approach, a market approach and a cost
approach, to determine the fair value of intangible assets
acquired based on the appropriateness of each method in relation
to the type of asset being valued. The assumptions used in these
valuation methods were analyzed and compared, where possible, to
available market data, such as industry-based weighted average
costs of capital and discount rates, trade name royalty rates,
public company valuation multiples and recent market acquisition
multiples. The level of inputs used for these fair value
measurements is the lowest level (Level 3). Quanta believes
that these valuation methods appropriately represent the methods
that would be used by other market participants in determining
fair value.
Quantas convertible subordinated notes, which were
redeemed in full on May 14, 2010, were not required to be
carried at fair value, although their fair market value was
required to be disclosed. Prior to the redemption, the fair
market value of Quantas convertible subordinated notes was
subject to interest rate risk because of their fixed interest
rate and market risk due to the convertible feature of the
convertible subordinated notes. The fair market value of this
fixed interest rate debt increased as interest rates fell and
decreased as interest rates rose. The fair market value of
Quantas convertible subordinated notes also increased as
the market price of its stock rose and decreased as the market
price of its stock fell. The interest and market value changes
affected the fair market value of Quantas convertible
subordinated notes but did not impact their carrying value. The
fair market value of Quantas convertible subordinated
notes was determined based upon the quoted secondary market
price on or before the dates specified, which is considered a
Level 2 input. The fair value of the aggregate outstanding
principal amount of Quantas convertible subordinated notes
of $143.8 million was $160.8 million at
December 31, 2009.
Quantas derivative liabilities are classified as
Level 2 liabilities at September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 and have a total fair market value of
$0.5 million and $0.7 million. The fair values are
determined based on adjusted
12
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
broker quotes derived from open market pricing information.
These derivative liabilities are included within accounts
payable and accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance
sheets.
Quanta uses fair value measurements on a routine basis in its
assessment of assets classified as goodwill, other intangible
assets and long-lived assets held and used. In accordance with
its annual impairment test during the quarter ended
December 31, 2009, the carrying amount of such assets,
including goodwill, was compared to its fair value. No changes
in carrying amount resulted. The inputs used for fair value
measurements for goodwill, other intangible assets and
long-lived assets held and used are the lowest level
(Level 3) inputs for which Quanta uses the assistance
of third party specialists to develop valuation assumptions.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Quanta recognizes compensation expense for all stock-based
compensation based on the fair value of the awards granted, net
of estimated forfeitures, at the date of grant. Quanta
calculates the fair value of stock options using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model. The fair value of restricted
stock awards is determined based on the number of shares granted
and the closing price of Quantas common stock on the date
of grant. Forfeitures are estimated based upon historical
activity. The resulting compensation expense from discretionary
awards is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite
service period, which is generally the vesting period, while
compensation expense from performance based awards is recognized
using the graded vesting method over the requisite service
period. The cash flows resulting from the tax deductions in
excess of the compensation expense recognized for stock options
and restricted stock (excess tax benefit) are classified as
financing cash flows.
Functional
Currency and Translation of Financial Statements
The U.S. dollar is the functional currency for the majority
of Quantas operations. However, Quanta has foreign
operating units in Canada, for which Quanta considers the
Canadian dollar to be the functional currency. Generally, the
currency in which the operating unit transacts a majority of its
transactions, including billings, financing, payroll and other
expenditures, would be considered the functional currency, but
any dependency upon the parent company and the nature of the
operating units operations must also be considered. Under
the relevant accounting guidance, the treatment of these
translation gains or losses is dependent upon managements
determination of the functional currency of each operating unit,
which involves consideration of all relevant economic facts and
circumstances affecting the operating unit. In preparing the
consolidated financial statements, Quanta translates the
financial statements of its foreign operating units from their
functional currency into U.S. dollars. Statements of
operations and cash flows are translated at average monthly
rates, while balance sheets are translated at the month-end
exchange rates. The translation of the balance sheets at the
month-end exchange rates results in translation gains or losses.
If transactions are denominated in the operating units
functional currency, the translation gains and losses are
included as a separate component of equity under the caption
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). If
transactions are not denominated in the operating units
functional currency, the translation gains and losses are
included within the statement of operations.
Derivatives
From time to time, Quanta may enter into forward currency
contracts that qualify as derivatives in order to hedge the
risks associated with fluctuations in foreign currency exchange
rates related to certain forecasted foreign currency denominated
transactions. Quanta does not enter into derivative transactions
for speculative purposes; however, for accounting purposes,
certain transactions may not meet the criteria for cash flow
hedge accounting. For a hedge to qualify for cash flow hedge
accounting treatment, a hedge must be documented at the
inception of the contract, with the objective and strategy
stated, along with an explicit description of the methodology
used to assess hedge effectiveness. The dates (or periods) for
the expected forecasted events and the nature of the exposure
involved (including quantitative measures of the size of the
exposure) must also be documented. At the inception of the hedge
and on an ongoing basis, the hedge must be deemed to be
highly effective at minimizing the risk of the
13
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
identified exposure. Effectiveness measures relate the gains or
losses of the derivative to changes in the cash flows associated
with the hedged item, and the forecasted transaction must be
probable of occurring.
For forward contracts that qualify as cash flow hedges, Quanta
accounts for the change in fair value of the forward contracts
directly in equity as part of accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss). Any ineffective portion of cash flow hedges is
recognized in earnings in the period ineffectiveness occurs. For
instance, if a forward contract is discontinued as a cash flow
hedge because it is probable that the original forecasted
transaction will not occur by the end of the originally
specified time period, the related amounts in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) would be reclassified to other
income (expense) in the consolidated statement of operations in
the period such determination is made. When a forecasted
transaction occurs, the portion of the accumulated gain or loss
applicable to the forecasted transaction is reclassified from
equity to earnings. Changes in fair value related to
transactions that do not meet the criteria for cash flow hedge
accounting are recorded in the consolidated results of
operations and are included in other income (expense).
Comprehensive
Income
Comprehensive income includes all changes in equity during a
period except those resulting from investments by and
distributions to stockholders. As described above, Quanta
records other comprehensive income, net of tax, for the foreign
currency translation adjustment related to its foreign
operations and for changes in fair value of its derivative
contracts that are classified as cash flow hedges.
|
|
3.
|
NEW
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS:
|
Adoption
of New Accounting Pronouncements.
On January 1, 2010, Quanta adopted new standards aimed to
improve the visibility of off-balance sheet vehicles previously
exempt from consolidation and address practice issues involving
the accounting for transfers of financial assets as sales or
secured borrowings. The impact from the adoption of these new
standards was not material.
On October 25, 2010, Quanta acquired Valard. In connection
with the acquisition, Quanta (i) paid to or for the benefit
of the shareholders of Valard an aggregate of approximately
$118.9 million in cash, (ii) issued to certain
shareholders 623,720 shares of Quanta common stock,
(iii) issued to certain shareholders 3,909,110 exchangeable
shares of a Canadian subsidiary of Quanta that are substantially
equivalent to, and exchangeable on a
one-for-one
basis for, Quanta common shares, and (iv) issued to a
voting trust on behalf of the holders of the exchangeable shares
one share of Quanta Series F preferred stock with voting
rights equivalent to Quanta common stock equal to the number of
exchangeable shares outstanding at any time. The aggregate value
of the above issued securities on the closing date totaled
approximately $88.5 million.
14
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
GOODWILL
AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS:
|
A summary of changes in Quantas goodwill between
December 31, 2009 and September 30, 2010 is as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric
|
|
|
Gas and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Power
|
|
|
Pipeline
|
|
|
Telecommunications
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
651,815
|
|
|
$
|
337,938
|
|
|
$
|
523,069
|
|
|
$
|
1,512,822
|
|
Accumulated impairment
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(63,264
|
)
|
|
|
(63,264
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
651,815
|
|
|
|
337,938
|
|
|
|
459,805
|
|
|
|
1,449,558
|
|
Foreign currency translation related to goodwill
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
Purchase price adjustments related to prior periods
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
651,876
|
|
|
|
337,922
|
|
|
|
523,069
|
|
|
|
1,512,867
|
|
Accumulated impairment
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(63,264
|
)
|
|
|
(63,264
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
651,876
|
|
|
$
|
337,922
|
|
|
$
|
459,805
|
|
|
$
|
1,449,603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As described in Note 2, Quantas operating units are
organized into one of Quantas three internal divisions and
accordingly, Quantas goodwill associated with each of its
operating units has been aggregated on a divisional basis and
reported in the table above. These divisions are closely aligned
with Quantas reportable segments based on the predominant
type of work performed by the operating units within the
divisions.
Intangible assets are comprised of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Assets, Net
|
|
|
Other intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
127,585
|
|
|
$
|
(19,234
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,274
|
)
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
|
$
|
102,077
|
|
Backlog
|
|
|
92,238
|
|
|
|
(64,347
|
)
|
|
|
(17,758
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
10,133
|
|
Trade names
|
|
|
23,649
|
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
|
|
(591
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
22,861
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
21,439
|
|
|
|
(9,398
|
)
|
|
|
(2,761
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
9,293
|
|
Patented rights and developed technology
|
|
|
16,078
|
|
|
|
(2,991
|
)
|
|
|
(950
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
12,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets
|
|
$
|
280,989
|
|
|
$
|
(96,167
|
)
|
|
$
|
(28,334
|
)
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
156,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses for the amortization of intangible assets were
$13.4 million and $5.4 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 and $28.3 million
and $15.3 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009. The remaining weighted average
amortization period for all intangible assets as of
September 30, 2010 is 13.2 years, while the remaining
weighted average amortization periods for customer
relationships, backlog, trade names, non-compete agreements and
the patented rights and developed technology are
12.3 years, 0.8 years,
15
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
29.0 years, 2.7 years and 10.0 years,
respectively. The estimated future aggregate amortization
expense of intangible assets as of September 30, 2010 is
set forth below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of 2010
|
|
$
|
8,364
|
|
2011
|
|
|
15,937
|
|
2012
|
|
|
14,712
|
|
2013
|
|
|
11,828
|
|
2014
|
|
|
11,224
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
94,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
156,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
PER SHARE
INFORMATION:
|
Basic earnings per share is computed using the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during the period, and
diluted earnings per share is computed using the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period
adjusted for all potentially dilutive common stock equivalents,
except in cases where the effect of the common stock equivalent
would be antidilutive. The amounts used to compute the basic and
diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 are illustrated below (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
NET INCOME:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stock
|
|
$
|
62,780
|
|
|
$
|
63,436
|
|
|
$
|
119,510
|
|
|
$
|
118,217
|
|
Effect of convertible subordinated notes under the
if-converted method interest expense
addback, net of taxes
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,659
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stock for diluted earnings per
share
|
|
$
|
62,780
|
|
|
$
|
65,095
|
|
|
$
|
119,510
|
|
|
$
|
118,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding for basic earnings per share
|
|
|
209,428
|
|
|
|
198,608
|
|
|
|
209,125
|
|
|
|
198,618
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock options
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
Effect of shares in escrow
|
|
|
1,532
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,532
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Effect of convertible subordinated notes under the
if-converted method weighted convertible
shares issuable
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
6,415
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding for diluted earnings per
share
|
|
|
211,096
|
|
|
|
205,224
|
|
|
|
210,798
|
|
|
|
198,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009, a nominal number of stock options were excluded from the
computation of diluted earnings per share because the grant
prices of these common stock equivalents were greater than the
average market price of Quantas common stock. For the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the effect of
assuming conversion of Quantas 3.75% convertible
subordinated notes would have been antidilutive and therefore
the shares issuable upon conversion were excluded from the
calculation of diluted earnings per share. See Note 7 below
regarding the redemption of the 3.75% convertible subordinated
16
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
notes on May 14, 2010. Shares placed in escrow related to
the acquisition of Price Gregory are included in the computation
of diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2010. These shares will be released
from escrow when certain conditions are satisfied.
Credit
Facility
Quanta has an agreement with various lenders that provides for a
$475.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility
maturing on September 19, 2012. Subject to the conditions
specified in the credit facility, borrowings under the credit
facility are to be used for working capital, capital
expenditures and other general corporate purposes. The entire
unused portion of the credit facility is available for the
issuance of letters of credit.
As of September 30, 2010, Quanta had approximately
$191.2 million of letters of credit issued under the credit
facility and no outstanding revolving loans. The remaining
$283.8 million was available for revolving loans or issuing
new letters of credit. Amounts borrowed under the credit
facility bear interest, at Quantas option, at a rate equal
to either (a) the Eurodollar Rate (as defined in the credit
facility) plus 0.875% to 1.75%, as determined by the ratio of
Quantas total funded debt to consolidated EBITDA (as
defined in the credit facility), or (b) the base rate (as
described below) plus 0.00% to 0.75%, as determined by the ratio
of Quantas total funded debt to consolidated EBITDA.
Letters of credit issued under the credit facility are subject
to a letter of credit fee of 0.875% to 1.75%, based on the ratio
of Quantas total funded debt to consolidated EBITDA.
Quanta is also subject to a commitment fee of 0.15% to 0.35%,
based on the ratio of its total funded debt to consolidated
EBITDA, on any unused availability under the credit facility.
The base rate equals the higher of (i) the Federal Funds
Rate (as defined in the credit facility) plus
1/2
of 1% or (ii) the banks prime rate.
The credit facility contains certain covenants, including
covenants with respect to maximum funded debt to consolidated
EBITDA, maximum senior debt to consolidated EBITDA and minimum
interest coverage, in each case as specified in the credit
facility. For purposes of calculating the maximum funded debt to
consolidated EBITDA ratio and the maximum senior debt to
consolidated EBITDA ratio, Quantas maximum funded debt and
maximum senior debt are reduced by all cash and cash equivalents
(as defined in the credit facility) held by Quanta in excess of
$25.0 million. As of September 30, 2010, Quanta was in
compliance with all of its covenants. The credit facility limits
certain acquisitions, mergers and consolidations, capital
expenditures, asset sales and prepayments of indebtedness and,
subject to certain exceptions, prohibits liens on material
assets. The credit facility also limits the payment of dividends
and stock repurchase programs in any fiscal year except those
payments or other distributions payable solely in capital stock.
The credit facility provides for customary events of default and
carries cross-default provisions with Quantas continuing
indemnity and security agreement with its sureties and all of
its other debt instruments exceeding $15.0 million in
borrowings. If an event of default (as defined in the credit
facility) occurs and is continuing, on the terms and subject to
the conditions set forth in the credit facility, amounts
outstanding under the credit facility may be accelerated and may
become or be declared immediately due and payable.
The credit facility is secured by a pledge of all of the capital
stock of Quantas U.S. subsidiaries, 65% of the
capital stock of its foreign subsidiaries and substantially all
of its assets. Quantas U.S. subsidiaries guarantee
the repayment of all amounts due under the credit facility.
3.75% Convertible
Subordinated Notes
Since May 14, 2010, none of Quantas 3.75% convertible
subordinated notes (3.75% Notes) were outstanding. The
3.75% Notes were originally issued in April 2006 for an
aggregate principal amount of $143.8 million and required
semi-annual interest payments on April 30 and October 30 until
maturity.
17
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
On May 14, 2010, Quanta redeemed all of the
$143.8 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of
the 3.75% Notes at a redemption price of 101.607% of the
principal amount of the notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest
to, but not including, the date of redemption. The redemption
resulted in a payment of the aggregate redemption price of
$146.1 million and the recognition of a loss on early
extinguishment of debt of approximately $7.1 million.
Included in the loss on early extinguishment of debt was a
non-cash loss of $3.5 million related to the difference
between the net carrying value and the estimated fair value of
the 3.75% Notes, calculated as of the date of redemption,
the payment of $2.3 million representing the 1.607%
redemption premium above par value and a non-cash loss of
$1.3 million from the write-off of the remaining
unamortized deferred financing costs related to the
3.75% Notes.
The $126.6 million of convertible subordinated notes on the
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 is
presented net of a debt discount of $17.2 million, which
was being amortized as interest expense. The effective interest
rate that was used to calculate total interest expense for the
3.75% Notes was 7.85%.
Treasury
Stock
Pursuant to the stock incentive plans described in Note 9,
employees may elect to satisfy their tax withholding obligations
upon vesting of restricted stock by having Quanta make such tax
payments and withhold a number of vested shares having a value
on the date of vesting equal to their tax withholding
obligation. As a result of such employee elections, Quanta
withheld 223,344 and 195,733 shares of Quanta common stock
with a total market value of $4.3 million and
$3.5 million for settlement of employee tax liabilities
during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
These shares were accounted for as treasury stock. Under
Delaware corporate law, treasury stock is not entitled to vote
or be counted for quorum purposes.
Noncontrolling
Interest
Quanta has a 50% interest in a joint venture that qualifies as a
variable interest entity and has been included on a consolidated
basis in the accompanying financial statements as described in
Note 2. As a result, income attributable to the other joint
venture member has been accounted for as a reduction of reported
net income of approximately $0.9 million and
$0.5 million related to the noncontrolling interest for the
three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 and
approximately $1.5 million and $0.9 million related to
the noncontrolling interest for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 to derive net income
attributable to the common stockholders of Quanta. Equity in the
consolidated assets and liabilities of the joint venture
attributable to the other joint venture member has been
accounted for as a noncontrolling interest component of total
equity in the accompanying balance sheets.
In conjunction with the Price Gregory acquisition on
October 1, 2009, Quanta acquired investments in three joint
ventures of 65%, 49% and 49%. These investments, which
constitute variable interest entities, have been included on a
consolidated basis in the accompanying financial statements with
nominal amounts recorded as net income attributable to the other
joint venture members in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010. Equity in the consolidated assets and
liabilities of the joint ventures attributable to the other
joint venture members has been accounted for as a noncontrolling
interest component of total equity in the accompanying balance
sheet.
The carrying values of the investments held by Quanta and the
noncontrolling interests in the variable interest entities that
have been included on a consolidated basis in the accompanying
financial statements at September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 were $3.0 million and
$1.4 million. There were no changes in equity as a result
of transfers (to) from the noncontrolling interest during the
period. Note 10 has further disclosures related to
Quantas joint venture arrangements.
18
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Comprehensive
Income
Quantas foreign operations are translated into
U.S. dollars, and a translation adjustment is recorded in
other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, as a result.
Additionally, unrealized gains and losses on foreign currency
cash flow hedges are also recorded in other comprehensive income
(loss), net of tax. The following table presents the components
of comprehensive income for the periods presented (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
63,700
|
|
|
$
|
63,956
|
|
|
$
|
121,123
|
|
|
$
|
119,090
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
1,945
|
|
|
|
2,274
|
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
4,780
|
|
Gain (loss) on foreign currency cash flow hedges, net of tax
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
65,663
|
|
|
|
66,199
|
|
|
|
123,396
|
|
|
|
123,839
|
|
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to the noncontrolling
interest
|
|
|
920
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
1,613
|
|
|
|
873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income attributable to common stock
|
|
$
|
64,743
|
|
|
$
|
65,679
|
|
|
$
|
121,783
|
|
|
$
|
122,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the third quarter of 2009, one of Quantas Canadian
operating units entered into three forward contracts with
settlement dates in December 2009, June 2010 and November 2010,
to reduce foreign currency risk associated with anticipated
customer sales that are denominated in South African rand. This
same operating unit also entered into three additional forward
contracts to reduce the foreign currency exposure associated
with a series of forecasted intercompany payments denominated in
U.S. dollars to be made over a twelve-month period, which
also had settlement dates in December 2009, June 2010 and
November 2010.
The South African rand to Canadian dollar forward contracts had
an aggregate notional amount of approximately $11.0 million
($CAD) at origination, with contracts for approximately
$5.8 million ($CAD) and $3.2 million ($CAD) being
settled in December 2009 and June 2010. These contracts have
been accounted for by the Canadian operating unit as cash flow
hedges. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of the forward
contracts between the South African rand and the Canadian dollar
are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) prior to their
settlement and have been and will be reclassified into earnings
in the periods in which the hedged transactions occur. During
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, gains
of $0.1 million and $0.2 million were recorded to
other comprehensive income (loss) related to the remaining South
African rand to Canadian dollar forward contract. Additionally,
during the second quarter of 2010, approximately
$0.1 million of loss was reclassified into current period
earnings in connection with the contract settled in June 2010.
The Canadian dollar to U.S. dollar forward contracts had an
aggregate notional amount of approximately $9.5 million
(U.S.) at origination, with contracts for approximately
$5.0 million and $2.7 million having settled in
December 2009 and June 2010. Such contracts have also been
accounted for as cash flow hedges. Accordingly, changes in the
fair value of the forward contracts between the Canadian dollar
and the U.S. dollar are recorded in other comprehensive
income (loss) prior to their settlement and have been or will be
reclassified into earnings in the periods in which the hedged
transactions occur. During the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010, a loss of $0.1 million and a gain
of $0.3 million were recorded to other comprehensive income
related to the remaining Canadian dollar to U.S. dollar
forward contract. Additionally, during the second quarter of
2010, approximately $0.3 million of loss was reclassified
into current period earnings in connection with the contract
settled in June 2010.
Effectiveness testing related to these cash flow hedges is
performed at the end of each quarter. Any ineffective portion of
these contracts is reclassified into earnings if the derivatives
are no longer deemed to be cash flow hedges.
19
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
For the quarter ended September 30, 2010, no portion of the
South African rand to Canadian dollar or Canadian dollar to
U.S. dollar forward contracts was considered ineffective.
|
|
9.
|
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION:
|
Stock
Incentive Plans
Pursuant to the Quanta Services, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan
(the 2007 Plan), which was adopted on May 24, 2007, Quanta
may award restricted common stock, incentive stock options and
non-qualified stock options. The purpose of the 2007 Plan is to
provide directors, key employees, officers and certain
consultants and advisors with additional performance incentives
by increasing their proprietary interest in Quanta. Prior to the
adoption of the 2007 Plan, Quanta had issued awards of
restricted common stock and stock options under its 2001 Stock
Incentive Plan (as amended and restated March 13, 2003)
(the 2001 Plan), which was terminated effective May 24,
2007, except that outstanding awards will continue to be
governed by the terms of the 2001 Plan. In connection with the
acquisition of InfraSource Services, Inc. (InfraSource) on
August 30, 2007, Quanta assumed InfraSources 2003
Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan and 2004 Omnibus Stock Incentive
Plan, in each case as amended (the InfraSource Plans). The
InfraSource Plans were terminated in connection with the
acquisition, although the terms of these plans will govern
outstanding awards. The 2007 Plan, the 2001 Plan and the
InfraSource Plans are referred to as the Plans.
Restricted
Stock
Restricted common stock has been issued under the Plans at the
fair market value of the common stock as of the date of
issuance. The shares of restricted common stock issued are
subject to forfeiture, restrictions on transfer and certain
other conditions until they vest, which generally occurs over
three or four years in equal annual installments. During the
restriction period, the restricted stockholders are entitled to
vote and receive dividends on such shares.
During the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
Quanta granted 6,252 and 6,453 shares of restricted stock
under the 2007 Plan with a weighted average grant price of
$19.99 and $23.25. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, Quanta granted
1.1 million and 0.9 million shares of restricted stock
under the 2007 Plan with a weighted average grant price of
$19.20 and $22.14. Additionally, during the three months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, 17,918 and 20,503 shares
vested with an approximate fair value at the time of vesting of
$0.3 million and $0.5 million. During the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, 0.7 million and
0.6 million shares vested with an approximate fair value at
the time of vesting of $13.3 million and $11.3 million.
As of September 30, 2010, there was approximately
$25.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to unvested restricted stock granted to both employees
and non-employees. This cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted average period of 1.93 years.
Stock
Options
No stock options have been granted by Quanta since November
2002. As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
the number of options outstanding under the 2001 Plan, all of
which have vested, was not material. Although some options
granted under the InfraSource Plans assumed in connection with
the InfraSource acquisition are still outstanding, certain
disclosures have been omitted due to immateriality. As of
September 30, 2010, there was approximately
$0.1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to unvested stock options issued under the InfraSource
Plans, which is expected to be recognized during 2010.
20
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Non-Cash
Compensation Expense and Related Tax Benefits
The amounts of non-cash compensation expense and related tax
benefits, as well as the amount of actual tax benefits related
to vested restricted stock and options exercised are as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Non-cash compensation expense related to restricted stock
|
|
$
|
5,522
|
|
|
$
|
4,383
|
|
|
$
|
16,922
|
|
|
$
|
12,890
|
|
Non-cash compensation expense related to stock options
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
586
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
1,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation included in selling, general and
administrative expenses
|
|
$
|
5,703
|
|
|
$
|
4,969
|
|
|
$
|
17,465
|
|
|
$
|
14,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual tax benefit (expense) from vested restricted stock
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
|
$
|
(1,923
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,595
|
)
|
Actual tax benefit (expense) from options exercised
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual tax benefit (expense) related to stock-based compensation
expense
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
(1,939
|
)
|
|
|
(1,581
|
)
|
Income tax benefit related to non-cash compensation expense
|
|
|
2,224
|
|
|
|
1,938
|
|
|
|
6,811
|
|
|
|
5,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tax benefit related to stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
2,272
|
|
|
$
|
2,052
|
|
|
$
|
4,872
|
|
|
$
|
4,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES:
|
Joint
Venture Contingencies
As described in Notes 2 and 8, one of Quantas
operating units operates in a joint venture with a third party
engineering company for the purpose of providing infrastructure
services under a contract with a large utility customer. Losses
incurred by the joint venture are typically shared equally by
the joint venture members. However, under the terms of the joint
venture agreement, each member of the joint venture has
guaranteed all of the obligations of the joint venture under the
contract with the customer and therefore can be liable for full
performance of the contract to the customer. Quanta is not aware
of circumstances that would lead to future claims against it for
material amounts in connection with this performance guarantee.
In addition, as described in Note 2, another of
Quantas operating units operates in a joint venture with a
third party for the purpose of providing joint engineering and
construction services for the design and installation of fuel
storage facilities under a contract with a specific customer.
Under the joint venture agreement, the losses incurred by the
joint venture are typically shared equally by the joint venture
partners. However, the joint venture is a general partnership,
and as such, the joint venture partners are jointly and
severally liable for all of the obligations of the joint
venture, including obligations owed to the customer or any other
person or entity. Quanta is not aware of circumstances that
would lead to future claims against it for material amounts in
connection with its joint and several liability.
In each of the above joint venture arrangements, each joint
venturer has indemnified the other for any liabilities incurred
in excess of the liabilities for which the joint venturer is
obligated to bear under the respective joint venture agreement.
It is possible, however, that Quanta could be required to pay or
perform obligations in excess of its share if the other joint
venturer failed or refused to pay or perform its share of the
obligations. Quanta is not aware of circumstances that would
lead to future claims against it for material amounts that would
not be indemnified.
21
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Leases
Quanta leases certain land, buildings and equipment under
non-cancelable lease agreements, including related party leases.
The terms of these agreements vary from lease to lease,
including some with renewal options and escalation clauses. The
following schedule shows the future minimum lease payments under
these leases as of September 30, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder of 2010
|
|
$
|
12,699
|
|
2011
|
|
|
39,195
|
|
2012
|
|
|
25,841
|
|
2013
|
|
|
18,916
|
|
2014
|
|
|
9,400
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
13,365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
119,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense related to operating leases was approximately
$27.2 million and $82.1 million for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2010 and approximately
$27.3 million and $81.7 million for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009.
Quanta has guaranteed the residual value on certain of its
equipment operating leases. Quanta guarantees the difference
between this residual value and the fair market value of the
underlying asset at the date of termination of the leases. At
September 30, 2010, the maximum guaranteed residual value
was approximately $118.0 million. Quanta believes that no
significant payments will be made as a result of the difference
between the fair market value of the leased equipment and the
guaranteed residual value. However, there can be no assurance
that significant payments will not be required in the future.
Committed
Capital Expenditures
Quanta has committed capital for expansion of its fiber optic
network. Quanta typically does not commit capital to new network
expansions until it has a committed lease arrangement in place
with at least one customer. The amounts of committed capital
expenditures are estimates of costs required to build the
networks under contract. The actual capital expenditures related
to building the networks could vary materially from these
estimates. As of September 30, 2010, Quanta estimates these
committed capital expenditures to be approximately
$10.7 million for the period October 1, 2010 through
December 31, 2010 and $8.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2011.
Litigation
Quanta is from time to time party to various lawsuits, claims
and other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of
business. These actions typically seek, among other things,
compensation for alleged personal injury, breach of contract
and/or
property damages, punitive damages, civil penalties or other
losses, or injunctive or declaratory relief. With respect to all
such lawsuits, claims and proceedings, Quanta records reserves
when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the
amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. None of these
proceedings, separately or in the aggregate, are expected to
have a material adverse effect on Quantas consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
22
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Concentration
of Credit Risk
Quanta is subject to concentrations of credit risk related
primarily to its cash and cash equivalents and its accounts
receivable, including amounts related to unbilled accounts
receivables and costs and estimated earnings in excess of
billings on uncompleted contracts. Substantially all of
Quantas cash investments are managed by what it believes
to be high credit quality financial institutions. In accordance
with Quantas investment policies, these institutions are
authorized to invest this cash in a diversified portfolio of
what Quanta believes to be high quality investments, which
consist primarily of interest-bearing demand deposits, money
market mutual funds and investment grade commercial paper with
original maturities of three months or less. Although Quanta
does not currently believe the principal amount of these
investments is subject to any material risk of loss, the
weakness in the economy has significantly impacted the interest
income Quanta receives from these investments and is likely to
continue to do so in the future. In addition, Quanta grants
credit under normal payment terms, generally without collateral,
to its customers, which include electric power, natural gas and
pipeline companies, telecommunications and cable television
system operators, governmental entities, general contractors,
and builders, owners and managers of commercial and industrial
properties located primarily in the United States. Consequently,
Quanta is subject to potential credit risk related to changes in
business and economic factors throughout the United States,
which may be heightened as a result of ongoing depressed
economic and financial market conditions. However, Quanta
generally has certain statutory lien rights with respect to
services provided. Under certain circumstances, such as
foreclosures or negotiated settlements, Quanta may take title to
the underlying assets in lieu of cash in settlement of
receivables. In such circumstances, extended time frames may be
required to liquidate these assets, causing the amounts realized
to differ from the value of the assumed receivable.
Historically, some of Quantas customers have experienced
significant financial difficulties, and others may experience
financial difficulties in the future. These difficulties expose
Quanta to increased risk related to collectability of
receivables and costs and estimated earnings in excess of
billings on uncompleted contracts for services Quanta has
performed. Two customers accounted for approximately 18% and 15%
of consolidated revenues during the three months ended
September 30, 2010, and one of these customers accounted
for approximately 11% of consolidated revenues during the nine
months ended September 30, 2010. These two customers
represented approximately 14% and 11% of billed and accrued
receivables at September 30, 2010. Revenues from these
customers are included in the Natural Gas and Pipeline
Infrastructure Services segment. No other customer represented
10% or more of revenues during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010. No customers represented 10% or more of
revenues during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 or of accounts receivable at
December 31, 2009.
Self-Insurance
Quanta is insured for employers liability, general
liability, auto liability and workers compensation claims.
As of August 1, 2010, all policies were renewed with
deductibles continuing at existing levels of $5.0 million
per occurrence, other than employers liability, which
continues to be subject to a deductible of $1.0 million.
Quanta also has employee healthcare benefit plans for most
employees not subject to collective bargaining agreements, of
which the primary plan is subject to a deductible of $350,000
per claimant per year. For the policy year ended July 31,
2009, employers liability claims were subject to a
deductible of $1.0 million per occurrence, general
liability and auto liability claims were subject to a deductible
of $3.0 million per occurrence, and workers
compensation claims were subject to a deductible of
$2.0 million per occurrence. Additionally, for the policy
year ended July 31, 2009, Quantas workers
compensation claims were subject to an annual cumulative
aggregate liability of up to $1.0 million on claims in
excess of $2.0 million per occurrence.
Losses under all of these insurance programs are accrued based
upon Quantas estimates of the ultimate liability for
claims reported and an estimate of claims incurred but not
reported, with assistance from third-party actuaries. These
insurance liabilities are difficult to assess and estimate due
to unknown factors, including the severity of an injury, the
determination of Quantas liability in proportion to other
parties, the number of incidents not reported and the
effectiveness of its safety program. The accruals are based upon
known facts and historical trends and management believes such
accruals to be adequate. As of September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009,
23
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the gross amount accrued for insurance claims totaled
$142.8 million and $153.6 million, with
$101.5 million and $109.8 million considered to be
long-term and included in other non-current liabilities. Related
insurance recoveries/receivables as of September 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009 were $26.5 million and
$33.7 million, of which $9.4 million and
$13.4 million are included in prepaid expenses and other
current assets and $17.1 million and $20.3 million are
included in other assets, net.
Quanta renews its insurance policies on an annual basis, and
therefore deductibles and levels of insurance coverage may
change in future periods. In addition, insurers may cancel
Quantas coverage or determine to exclude certain items
from coverage, or the cost to obtain such coverage may become
unreasonable. In any such event, Quantas overall risk
exposure would increase, which could negatively affect its
results of operations and financial condition.
Letters
of Credit
Certain of Quantas vendors require letters of credit to
ensure reimbursement for amounts they are disbursing on its
behalf, such as to beneficiaries under its self-funded insurance
programs. In addition, from time to time some customers require
Quanta to post letters of credit to ensure payment to its
subcontractors and vendors under those contracts and to
guarantee performance under its contracts. Such letters of
credit are generally issued by a bank or similar financial
institution. The letter of credit commits the issuer to pay
specified amounts to the holder of the letter of credit if the
holder demonstrates that Quanta has failed to perform specified
actions. If this were to occur, Quanta would be required to
reimburse the issuer of the letter of credit. Depending on the
circumstances of such a reimbursement, Quanta may also have to
record a charge to earnings for the reimbursement. Quanta does
not believe that it is likely that any material claims will be
made under a letter of credit in the foreseeable future.
As of September 30, 2010, Quanta had $191.2 million in
letters of credit outstanding under its credit facility
primarily to secure obligations under its casualty insurance
program. These are irrevocable stand-by letters of credit with
maturities generally expiring at various times throughout 2010
and 2011. Upon maturity, it is expected that the majority of
these letters of credit will be renewed for subsequent one-year
periods.
Performance
Bonds and Parent Guarantees
In certain circumstances, Quanta is required to provide
performance bonds in connection with its contractual
commitments. Quanta has indemnified its sureties for any
expenses paid out under these performance bonds. As of
September 30, 2010, the total amount of outstanding
performance bonds was approximately $1.1 billion, and the
estimated cost to complete these bonded projects was
approximately $246.1 million.
Quanta, from time to time, guarantees the obligations of its
wholly owned subsidiaries, including obligations under certain
contracts with customers, certain lease obligations and, in some
states, obligations in connection with obtaining contractors
licenses. Quanta has also guaranteed the obligations of its
wholly owned subsidiary that is a party to the joint venture
arrangement with a third party engineering company.
Employment
Agreements
Quanta has various employment agreements with certain executives
and other employees, which provide for compensation and certain
other benefits and for severance payments under certain
circumstances. Certain employment agreements also contain
clauses that become effective upon a change of control of
Quanta. Upon the occurrence of any of the defined events in the
various employment agreements, Quanta will pay certain amounts
to the employee, which vary with the level of the
employees responsibility.
Collective
Bargaining Agreements
Certain of Quantas operating units are parties to various
collective bargaining agreements with certain of their
employees. The agreements require such subsidiaries to pay
specified wages, provide certain benefits to their union
24
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
employees and contribute certain amounts to multi-employer
pension plans and employee benefit trusts. Quantas
multi-employer pension plan contribution rates are determined
annually and assessed on a pay-as-you-go basis based
on its union employee payrolls, which cannot be determined for
future periods because the location and number of union
employees that Quanta has employed at any given time and the
plans in which they may participate vary depending on projects
Quanta has ongoing at any time and the need for union resources
in connection with those projects. The collective bargaining
agreements expire at various times and have typically been
renegotiated and renewed on terms similar to the ones contained
in the expiring agreements.
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended
by the Multi-Employer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980,
imposes certain liabilities upon employers who are contributors
to a multi-employer plan in the event of the employers
withdrawal from, or upon termination of, such plan. None of
Quantas operating units have any current plans to withdraw
from these plans. In addition, the Pension Protection Act of
2006 added new funding rules generally applicable to plan years
beginning after 2007 for multi-employer plans that are
classified as endangered, seriously
endangered, or critical status. For a plan in
critical status, additional required contributions and benefit
reductions may apply. Quanta has been notified that two plans to
which a Quanta operating unit contributes are in
critical status. One of the plans requires
additional contributions in the form of a surcharge on future
benefit contributions required for future work performed by
union employees covered by this plan. The amount of additional
funds that Quanta may be obligated to contribute to this plan in
the future cannot be estimated, as such amounts will be based on
future levels of work that require the specific use of those
union employees covered by this plan. No additional
contributions are required for the other plan.
Indemnities
Quanta has indemnified various parties against specified
liabilities that those parties might incur in the future in
connection with Quantas previous acquisitions of certain
companies. The indemnities under acquisition agreements usually
are contingent upon the other party incurring liabilities that
reach specified thresholds. Quanta also generally indemnifies
its customers for the services it provides under its contracts,
as well as other specified liabilities, which may subject Quanta
to indemnity claims and liabilities and related litigation. As
of September 30, 2010, Quanta does not believe any material
liabilities for asserted claims against it in connection with
any of these indemnity obligations are probable.
Quanta presents its operations under four reportable segments:
(1) Electric Power Infrastructure Services,
(2) Natural Gas and Pipeline Infrastructure Services,
(3) Telecommunications Infrastructure Services and
(4) Fiber Optic Licensing. This structure is generally
focused on broad end-user markets for Quantas services.
The Electric Power Infrastructure Services segment provides
comprehensive network solutions to customers in the electric
power industry. Services performed by the Electric Power
Infrastructure Services segment generally include the design,
installation, upgrade, repair and maintenance of electric power
transmission and distribution networks and substation facilities
along with other engineering and technical services. This
segment also provides emergency restoration services, including
repairing infrastructure damaged by inclement weather, the
energized installation, maintenance and upgrade of electric
power infrastructure utilizing unique bare hand and hot stick
methods and our proprietary robotic arm technologies, and the
installation of smart grid technologies on electric
power networks. In addition, this segment designs, installs and
maintains wind turbine facilities and solar arrays and related
switchyards and transmission networks for renewable power
generation sources. To a lesser extent, this segment provides
services such as the design, installation, maintenance and
repair of commercial and industrial wiring, installation of
traffic networks and the installation of cable and control
systems for light rail lines.
The Natural Gas and Pipeline Infrastructure Services segment
provides comprehensive network solutions to customers involved
in the transportation of natural gas, oil and other pipeline
products. Services performed by the Natural Gas and Pipeline
Infrastructure Services segment generally include the design,
installation, repair and
25
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
maintenance of natural gas and oil transmission and distribution
systems, compressor and pump stations and gas gathering systems,
as well as related trenching, directional boring and automatic
welding services. In addition, this segments services
include pipeline protection, pipeline integrity and
rehabilitation and fabrication of pipeline support systems and
related structures and facilities. This segment also provides
emergency restoration services, including repairing natural gas
and oil pipeline infrastructure damaged by inclement weather. To
a lesser extent, this segment designs, installs and maintains
airport fueling systems as well as water and sewer
infrastructure.
The Telecommunications Infrastructure Services segment provides
comprehensive network solutions to customers in the
telecommunications and cable television industries. Services
performed by the Telecommunications Infrastructure Services
segment generally include the design, installation, repair and
maintenance of fiber optic, copper and coaxial cable networks
used for video, data and voice transmission, as well as the
design and installation of wireless communications towers and
switching systems. This segment also provides emergency
restoration services, including repairing telecommunications
infrastructure damaged by inclement weather. To a lesser extent,
services provided under this segment include cable locating,
splicing and testing of fiber optic networks and residential
installation of fiber optic cabling.
The Fiber Optic Licensing segment designs, procures, constructs
and maintains fiber optic telecommunications infrastructure in
select markets and licenses the right to use these
point-to-point
fiber optic telecommunications facilities to its customers
pursuant to licensing agreements, typically with lease terms
from five to twenty-five years, inclusive of certain renewal
options. Under those agreements, customers are provided the
right to use a portion of the capacity of a fiber optic
facility, with the facility owned and maintained by Quanta. The
Fiber Optic Licensing segment provides services to enterprise,
education, carrier, financial services and healthcare customers
and other entities with high bandwidth telecommunication needs.
The telecommunication services provided through this segment are
subject to regulation by the Federal Communications Commission
and certain state public utility commissions.
Quantas segment results are derived from the types of
services provided across its operating units in each of the end
user markets described above. Quantas entrepreneurial
business model allows each of its operating units to serve the
same or similar customers and to provide a range of services
across end user markets. Quantas operating units are
organized into one of three internal divisions, namely, the
electric power division, natural gas and pipeline division and
telecommunications division. These internal divisions are
closely aligned with the reportable segments described above
based on their operating units predominant type of work,
with the operating units providing predominantly
telecommunications and fiber optic licensing services being
managed within the same internal division.
Reportable segment information, including revenues and operating
income by type of work, is gathered from each operating unit for
the purpose of evaluating segment performance in support of
Quantas market strategies. These classifications of
Quantas operating unit revenues by type of work for
segment reporting purposes can at times require judgment on the
part of management. Quantas operating units may perform
joint infrastructure service projects for customers in multiple
industries, deliver multiple types of network services under a
single customer contract or provide service across industries,
for example, joint trenching projects to install distribution
lines for electric power, natural gas and telecommunications
customers or the installation of broadband communication over
electric power lines.
In addition, Quantas integrated operations and common
administrative support at each of its operating units requires
that certain allocations, including allocations of shared and
indirect costs, such as facility costs, indirect operating
expenses including depreciation, and general and administrative
costs, are made to determine operating segment profitability.
Corporate costs, such as payroll and benefits, employee travel
expenses, facility costs, professional fees, acquisition costs
and amortization related to certain intangible assets are not
allocated.
26
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Summarized financial information for Quantas reportable
segments is presented in the following tables (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric Power
|
|
$
|
532,603
|
|
|
$
|
512,797
|
|
|
$
|
1,452,774
|
|
|
$
|
1,551,496
|
|
Natural Gas and Pipeline
|
|
|
551,674
|
|
|
|
131,628
|
|
|
|
1,003,728
|
|
|
|
433,138
|
|
Telecommunications
|
|
|
93,618
|
|
|
|
113,998
|
|
|
|
289,506
|
|
|
|
284,024
|
|
Fiber Optic Licensing
|
|
|
28,112
|
|
|
|
22,371
|
|
|
|
78,784
|
|
|
|
64,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
1,206,007
|
|
|
$
|
780,794
|
|
|
$
|
2,824,792
|
|
|
$
|
2,332,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric Power
|
|
$
|
60,361
|
|
|
$
|
66,778
|
|
|
$
|
150,567
|
|
|
$
|
178,768
|
|
Natural Gas and Pipeline
|
|
|
53,118
|
|
|
|
2,097
|
|
|
|
97,388
|
|
|
|
8,157
|
|
Telecommunications
|
|
|
5,605
|
|
|
|
12,317
|
|
|
|
12,499
|
|
|
|
18,684
|
|
Fiber Optic Licensing
|
|
|
13,266
|
|
|
|
11,757
|
|
|
|
39,265
|
|
|
|
32,023
|
|
Corporate and non-allocated costs
|
|
|
(37,789
|
)
|
|
|
(21,787
|
)
|
|
|
(98,043
|
)
|
|
|
(67,942
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
94,561
|
|
|
$
|
71,162
|
|
|
$
|
201,676
|
|
|
$
|
169,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric Power
|
|
$
|
10,091
|
|
|
$
|
10,068
|
|
|
$
|
30,060
|
|
|
$
|
30,157
|
|
Natural Gas and Pipeline
|
|
|
10,494
|
|
|
|
5,530
|
|
|
|
32,992
|
|
|
|
16,521
|
|
Telecommunications
|
|
|
1,671
|
|
|
|
1,678
|
|
|
|
5,135
|
|
|
|
4,864
|
|
Fiber Optic Licensing
|
|
|
3,246
|
|
|
|
2,489
|
|
|
|
9,415
|
|
|
|
6,676
|
|
Corporate and non-allocated costs
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
809
|
|
|
|
2,775
|
|
|
|
2,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
26,502
|
|
|
$
|
20,574
|
|
|
$
|
80,377
|
|
|
$
|
60,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Separate measures of Quantas assets and cash flows,
including capital expenditures, by reportable segment are not
produced or utilized by management to evaluate segment
performance. Quantas fixed assets include operating
machinery, equipment and vehicles that are used on an
interchangeable basis across its reportable segments, as well as
office equipment, buildings and leasehold improvements that are
shared across segment operations. As a result, depreciation is
allocated to Quantas reportable segments based upon each
operating units revenue contribution to each reportable
segment.
Foreign
Operations
Quanta does not have significant operations or long-lived assets
in countries outside of the United States. Quanta derived
$75.2 million and $27.2 million of its revenues from
foreign operations, the majority of which was earned in Canada,
during the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
Quanta derived $173.4 million and $61.6 million of its
revenues from foreign operations, the majority of which was
earned in Canada, during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009. In addition, Quanta held
property and equipment of $64.7 million and
$57.1 million in foreign countries as of September 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009.
27
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition
and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our
condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes
included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
and with our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, which was filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 1,
2010 and is available on the SECs website at www.sec.gov
and on our website, which is www.quantaservices.com. The
discussion below contains forward-looking statements that are
based upon our current expectations and are subject to
uncertainty and changes in circumstances. Actual results may
differ materially from these expectations due to inaccurate
assumptions and known or unknown risks and uncertainties,
including those identified under the headings Uncertainty
of Forward-Looking Statements and Information below in
this Item 2 and Risk Factors in Item 1A of
Part II of this Quarterly Report.
Introduction
We are a leading national provider of specialty contracting
services, offering infrastructure solutions to the electric
power, natural gas, oil and telecommunications industries. The
services we provide include the design, installation, upgrade,
repair and maintenance of infrastructure within each of the
industries we serve, such as electric power transmission and
distribution networks and substation facilities, natural gas and
oil transmission and distribution systems, and fiber optic,
copper and coaxial cable networks used for video, data and voice
transmission. We also design, procure, construct and maintain
fiber optic telecommunications infrastructure in select markets
and license the right to use these
point-to-point
fiber optic telecommunications facilities to customers.
We report our results under four reportable segments:
(1) Electric Power Infrastructure Services,
(2) Natural Gas and Pipeline Infrastructure Services,
(3) Telecommunications Infrastructure Services and
(4) Fiber Optic Licensing. These reportable segments are
based on the types of services we provide. Our consolidated
revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were
approximately $2.82 billion, of which 51.4% was
attributable to the Electric Power Infrastructure Services
segment, 35.5% to the Natural Gas and Pipeline Infrastructure
Services segment, 10.3% to the Telecommunications Infrastructure
Services segment and 2.8% to the Fiber Optic Licensing segment.
Our customers include many of the leading companies in the
industries we serve. We have developed strong strategic
alliances with numerous customers and strive to develop and
maintain our status as a preferred vendor to our customers. We
enter into various types of contracts, including competitive
unit price, hourly rate, cost-plus (or time and materials
basis), and fixed price (or lump sum basis), the final terms and
prices of which we frequently negotiate with the customer.
Although the terms of our contracts vary considerably, most are
made on either a unit price or fixed price basis in which we
agree to do the work for a price per unit of work performed
(unit price) or for a fixed amount for the entire project (fixed
price). We complete a substantial majority of our fixed price
projects within one year, while we frequently provide
maintenance and repair work under open-ended unit price or
cost-plus master service agreements that are renewable
periodically.
We recognize revenue on our unit price and cost-plus contracts
when units are completed or services are performed. For our
fixed price contracts, we record revenues as work on the
contract progresses on a
percentage-of-completion
basis. Under this method, revenue is recognized based on the
percentage of total costs incurred to date in proportion to
total estimated costs to complete the contract. Fixed price
contracts generally include retainage provisions under which a
percentage of the contract price is withheld until the project
is complete and has been accepted by our customer.
For internal management purposes, we are organized into three
internal divisions, namely, the electric power division, the
natural gas and pipeline division and the telecommunications
division. These internal divisions are closely aligned with the
reportable segments described above based on the predominant
type of work provided by the operating units within a division.
The operating units providing predominantly telecommunications
and fiber optic licensing services are managed within the same
internal division.
Reportable segment information, including revenues and operating
income by type of work, is gathered from each operating unit for
the purpose of evaluating segment performance in support of our
market strategies. These
28
classifications of our operating unit revenues by type of work
for segment reporting purposes can at times require judgment on
the part of management. Our operating units may perform joint
infrastructure service projects for customers in multiple
industries, deliver multiple types of network services under a
single customer contract or provide services across industries,
for example, joint trenching projects to install distribution
lines for electric power, natural gas and telecommunication
customers or the installation of broadband communication over
electric power lines. Our integrated operations and common
administrative support at each of our operating units require
that certain allocations, including allocations of shared and
indirect costs, such as facility costs, indirect operating
expenses including depreciation and general and administrative
costs, are made to determine operating segment profitability.
Corporate costs, such as payroll and benefits, employee travel
expenses, facility costs, professional fees, acquisition costs
and amortization related to certain intangible costs are not
allocated.
The Electric Power Infrastructure Services segment provides
comprehensive network solutions to customers in the electric
power industry. Services performed by the Electric Power
Infrastructure Services segment generally include the design,
installation, upgrade, repair and maintenance of electric power
transmission and distribution networks and substation facilities
along with other engineering and technical services. This
segment also provides emergency restoration services, including
repairing infrastructure damaged by inclement weather, the
energized installation, maintenance and upgrade of electric
power infrastructure utilizing unique bare hand and hot stick
methods and our proprietary robotic arm technologies, and the
installation of smart grid technologies on electric
power networks. In addition, this segment designs, installs and
maintains wind turbine facilities and solar arrays and related
switchyards and transmission networks for renewable power
generation sources. To a lesser extent, this segment provides
services such as the design, installation, maintenance and
repair of commercial and industrial wiring, installation of
traffic networks and the installation of cable and control
systems for light rail lines.
The Natural Gas and Pipeline Infrastructure Services segment
provides comprehensive network solutions to customers involved
in the transportation of natural gas, oil and other pipeline
products. Services performed by the Natural Gas and Pipeline
Infrastructure Services segment generally include the design,
installation, repair and maintenance of natural gas and oil
transmission and distribution systems, compressor and pump
stations and gas gathering systems, as well as related
trenching, directional boring and automatic welding services. In
addition, this segments services include pipeline
protection, pipeline integrity and rehabilitation and
fabrication of pipeline support systems and related structures
and facilities. This segment also provides emergency restoration
services, including repairing natural gas and oil pipeline
infrastructure damaged by inclement weather. To a lesser extent,
this segment designs, installs and maintains airport fueling
systems as well as water and sewer infrastructure.
The Telecommunications Infrastructure Services segment provides
comprehensive network solutions to customers in the
telecommunications and cable television industries. Services
performed by the Telecommunications Infrastructure Services
segment generally include the design, installation, repair and
maintenance of fiber optic, copper and coaxial cable networks
used for video, data and voice transmission, as well as the
design and installation of wireless communications towers and
switching systems. This segment also provides emergency
restoration services, including repairing telecommunications
infrastructure damaged by inclement weather. To a lesser extent,
services provided under this segment include cable locating,
splicing and testing of fiber optic networks and residential
installation of fiber optic cabling.
The Fiber Optic Licensing segment designs, procures, constructs
and maintains fiber optic telecommunications infrastructure in
select markets and licenses the right to use these
point-to-point
fiber optic telecommunications facilities to its customers
pursuant to licensing agreements, typically with lease terms
from five to twenty-five years, inclusive of certain renewal
options. Under those agreements, customers are provided the
right to use a portion of the capacity of a fiber optic
facility, with the facility owned and maintained by us. The
Fiber Optic Licensing segment provides services to enterprise,
education, carrier, financial services and healthcare customers
and other entities with high bandwidth telecommunication needs.
The telecommunication services provided through this segment are
subject to regulation by the Federal Communications Commission
and certain state public utility commissions.
29
Price
Gregory Acquisition
On October 1, 2009, we acquired Price Gregory Services,
Incorporated (Price Gregory), which provides natural gas and oil
transmission pipeline infrastructure services in North America.
In connection with this acquisition, we issued approximately
10.9 million shares of our common stock valued at
approximately $231.8 million and paid approximately
$95.8 million in cash to the stockholders of Price Gregory.
The results of Price Gregory have been included in our
consolidated financial statements beginning on October 1,
2009. The acquisition significantly expanded our natural gas and
pipeline operations. In conjunction with this acquisition, we
added the natural gas and pipeline division for internal
management purposes. Because of the type of work performed by
Price Gregory, its financial results are generally included in
the Natural Gas and Pipeline Infrastructure Services segment.
Backlog
Backlog represents the amount of revenue that we expect to
realize from work to be performed in the future on uncompleted
contracts, including new contractual agreements on which work
has not begun. The backlog estimates include amounts under
long-term maintenance contracts in addition to construction
contracts. We determine the amount of backlog for work under
long-term maintenance contracts, or master service agreements
(MSAs), by using recurring historical trends inherent in the
current MSAs, factoring in seasonal demand and projected
customer needs based upon ongoing communications with the
customer. We also include in backlog our share of work to be
performed under contracts signed by joint ventures in which we
have an ownership interest. The following tables present our
total backlog by reportable segment as of September 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009, along with an estimate of the
backlog amounts expected to be realized within 12 months of
each balance sheet date (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog as of
|
|
|
Backlog as of
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
12 Month
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
12 Month
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Electric Power Infrastructure Services
|
|
$
|
1,562,553
|
|
|
$
|
4,163,150
|
|
|
$
|
1,312,141
|
|
|
$
|
3,855,320
|
|
Natural Gas and Pipeline Infrastructure Services
|
|
|
627,697
|
|
|
|
841,433
|
|
|
|
847,702
|
|
|
|
1,120,795
|
|
Telecommunications Infrastructure Services
|
|
|
189,329
|
|
|
|
315,090
|
|
|
|
222,999
|
|
|
|
285,295
|
|
Fiber Optic Licensing
|
|
|
95,815
|
|
|
|
403,957
|
|
|
|
87,786
|
|
|
|
387,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,475,394
|
|
|
$
|
5,723,630
|
|
|
$
|
2,470,628
|
|
|
$
|
5,648,783
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As discussed above, our backlog estimates include amounts under
MSAs. In many instances, our customers are not contractually
committed to specific volumes of services under our MSAs, and
many of our contracts may be terminated with notice. There can
be no assurance as to our customers requirements or that
our estimates are accurate. In addition, many of our MSAs, as
well as contracts for fiber optic licensing, are subject to
renewal options. For purposes of calculating backlog, we have
included future renewal options only to the extent the renewals
can reasonably be expected to occur. Contracts included in
backlog can be subject to delays as a result of commercial
issues, regulatory requirements and other factors which could
cause revenue amounts to be realized in periods later than
originally expected.
Seasonality;
Fluctuations of Results; Economic Conditions
Our revenues and results of operations can be subject to
seasonal and other variations. These variations are influenced
by weather, customer spending patterns, bidding seasons, project
schedules and timing and holidays. Typically, our revenues are
lowest in the first quarter of the year because cold, snowy or
wet conditions cause delays. The second quarter is typically
better than the first, as some projects begin, but continued
cold and wet weather can often impact second quarter
productivity. The third quarter is typically the best of the
year, as a greater number of projects are underway and weather
is normally more accommodating to work on projects. Generally,
revenues during the fourth quarter of the year are lower than
the third quarter but higher than the second quarter. Many
projects are completed in the fourth quarter, and revenues are
often impacted positively by customers seeking to spend their
capital budget before the end of the year; however, the holiday
season and inclement weather sometimes can cause delays and
thereby reduce revenues and increase costs. Any quarter may be
positively or negatively
30
affected by atypical weather patterns such as excessive rainfall
in a given part of the country or warmer winter weather, making
it difficult to predict these variations quarter-to-quarter and
their effect on particular projects.
Additionally, our industry can be highly cyclical. As a result,
our volume of business may be adversely affected by declines or
delays in new projects in various geographic regions in the
United States. Project schedules, in particular in connection
with larger, longer-term projects, can also create fluctuations
in the services provided, which may adversely affect us in a
given period. The financial condition of our customers and their
access to capital, variations in the margins of projects
performed during any particular period, regional, national and
global economic and market conditions, timing of acquisitions,
the timing and magnitude of acquisition and integration costs
associated with acquisitions and interest rate fluctuations may
also materially affect quarterly results. Accordingly, our
operating results in any particular period may not be indicative
of the results that can be expected for any other period. You
should read Outlook and
Understanding Margins for additional
discussion of trends and challenges that may affect our
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We and our customers are operating in a challenging business
environment in light of the slow economy, weak capital markets
and increasing regulatory requirements. We are closely
monitoring our customers and the effect that changes in
economic, market and regulatory conditions have had or may have
on them. We have experienced reduced spending by our customers
since late 2008, and we anticipate that the challenges they face
will continue to affect demand for our services in the near-term
until conditions improve. However, we believe that most of our
customers, many of whom are regulated utilities, remain
financially stable in general and will be able to continue with
their business plans in the long-term. You should read
Outlook and Understanding
Margins for additional discussion of trends and
challenges that may affect our financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows.
Understanding
Margins
Our gross margin is gross profit expressed as a percentage of
revenues, and our operating margin is operating income expressed
as a percentage of revenues. Cost of services, which is
subtracted from revenues to obtain gross profit, consists
primarily of salaries, wages and benefits to employees,
depreciation, fuel and other equipment expenses, equipment
rentals, subcontracted services, insurance, facilities expenses,
materials and parts and supplies. Selling, general and
administrative expenses and amortization of intangible assets
are then subtracted from gross profit to obtain operating
income. Various factors some controllable, some
not impact our margins on a quarterly or annual
basis.
Seasonal and Geographical. As discussed above,
seasonal patterns can have a significant impact on margins.
Generally, business is slower in the winter months versus the
warmer months of the year. This can be offset somewhat by
increased demand for electrical service and repair work
resulting from severe weather. In addition, the mix of business
conducted in different parts of the country will affect margins,
as some parts of the country offer the opportunity for higher
margins than others due to the geographic characteristics
associated with the physical location where the work is being
performed. Such characteristics include whether the project is
performed in an urban versus a rural setting or in a mountainous
area or in open terrain. Site conditions, including unforeseen
underground conditions, can also impact margins.
Weather. Adverse or favorable weather
conditions can impact margins in a given period. For example, it
is typical that parts of the country may experience snow or
rainfall that may negatively impact our revenues and margins due
to reduced productivity. In many cases, projects may be delayed
or temporarily placed on hold. Conversely, in periods when
weather remains dry and temperatures are accommodating, more
work can be done, sometimes with less cost, which would have a
favorable impact on margins. In some cases, severe weather, such
as hurricanes and ice storms, can provide us with higher margin
emergency restoration service work, which generally has a
positive impact on margins.
Revenue Mix. The mix of revenues derived from
the industries we serve will impact margins, as certain
industries provide higher margin opportunities. Additionally,
changes in our customers spending patterns in each of the
industries we serve can cause an imbalance in supply and demand
and, therefore, affect margins and mix of revenues by industry
served.
31
Service and Maintenance versus
Installation. Installation work is often obtained
on a fixed price basis, while maintenance work is often
performed under pre-established or negotiated prices or
cost-plus pricing arrangements. Margins for installation work
may vary from project to project, and can be higher than
maintenance work, because work obtained on a fixed price basis
has higher risk than other types of pricing arrangements. We
typically derive approximately 30% of our annual revenues from
maintenance work, but a higher portion of installation work in
any given period may affect our margins for that period.
Subcontract Work. Work that is subcontracted
to other service providers generally yields lower margins. An
increase in subcontract work in a given period may contribute to
a decrease in margins. We typically subcontract approximately
10% to 15% of our work to other service providers.
Materials versus Labor. Typically, our
customers are responsible for supplying their own materials on
projects; however, for some of our contracts, we may agree to
procure all or part of the required materials. Margins may be
lower on projects where we furnish a significant amount of
materials, as our
mark-up on
materials is generally lower than on our labor costs. In a given
period, an increase in the percentage of work with higher
materials procurement requirements may decrease our overall
margins.
Depreciation. We include depreciation in cost
of services. This is common practice in our industry, but it can
make comparability to other companies difficult. This must be
taken into consideration when comparing us to other companies.
Insurance. Margins could be impacted by
fluctuations in insurance accruals as additional claims arise
and as circumstances and conditions of existing claims change.
We are insured for employers liability, general liability,
auto liability and workers compensation claims. As of
August 1, 2010, all policies were renewed with deductibles
continuing at existing levels of $5.0 million per
occurrence other than employers liability, which continues
to be subject to a deductible of $1.0 million. We also have
employee healthcare benefit plans for most employees not subject
to collective bargaining agreements, of which the primary plan
is subject to a deductible of $350,000 per claimant per year.
For the policy year ended July 31, 2009, employers
liability claims were subject to a deductible of
$1.0 million per occurrence, general liability and auto
liability claims were subject to a deductible of
$3.0 million per occurrence, and workers compensation
claims were subject to a deductible of $2.0 million per
occurrence. Additionally, through July 31, 2009, our
workers compensation claims were subject to an annual
cumulative aggregate liability of up to $1.0 million on
claims in excess of $2.0 million per occurrence.
Performance Risk. Margins may fluctuate
because of the volume of work and the impacts of pricing and job
productivity, which can be impacted both favorably and
negatively by weather, geography, customer decisions and crew
productivity. For example, when comparing a service contract
between a current quarter and the comparable prior years
quarter, factors affecting the gross margins associated with the
revenues generated by the contract may include pricing under the
contract, the volume of work performed under the contract, the
mix of the type of work specifically being performed and the
productivity of the crews performing the work. Productivity of a
crew can be influenced by many factors, including where the work
is performed (e.g., rural versus urban area or
mountainous or rocky area versus open terrain), whether the work
is on an open or encumbered right of way, or the impacts of
inclement weather. These types of factors are not practicable to
quantify through accounting data, but each may have a direct
impact on the gross margin of a specific project.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily
of compensation and related benefits to management,
administrative salaries and benefits, marketing, office rent and
utilities, communications, professional fees, bad debt expense,
acquisition costs, gains and losses on the sale of property and
equipment, letter of credit fees and maintenance, training and
conversion costs related to the implementation of information
technology solutions.
32
Results
of Operations
The following table sets forth selected statements of operations
data and such data as a percentage of revenues for the three and
nine month periods indicated (dollars in thousands):
Consolidated
Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
1,206,007
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
780,794
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,824,792
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,332,703
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of services (including depreciation)
|
|
|
1,016,013
|
|
|
|
84.2
|
|
|
|
633,166
|
|
|
|
81.1
|
|
|
|
2,349,619
|
|
|
|
83.2
|
|
|
|
1,930,162
|
|
|
|
82.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
189,994
|
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
|
|
147,628
|
|
|
|
18.9
|
|
|
|
475,173
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
402,541
|
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
82,037
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
71,018
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
245,163
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
217,591
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
13,396
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
5,448
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
28,334
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
15,260
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
94,561
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
71,162
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
201,676
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
169,690
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(269
|
)
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
(2,816
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(4,660
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(8,437
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
1,166
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
2,047
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
(7,107
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
479
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
826
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
95,189
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
|
|
69,276
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
191,446
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
|
|
164,126
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
31,489
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
5,320
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
70,323
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
45,036
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
63,700
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
63,956
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
121,123
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
119,090
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
920
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
1,613
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
873
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stock
|
|
$
|
62,780
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
63,436
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
119,510
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
118,217
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the three
months ended September 30, 2009
Revenues. Revenues increased
$425.2 million, or 54.5%, to $1.2 billion for the
three months ended September 30, 2010. Natural gas and
pipeline infrastructure services revenues increased
$420.0 million, or 319.1%, to $551.7 million, electric
power infrastructure services revenues increased
$19.8 million, or 3.9%, to $532.6 million and fiber
optic licensing revenues increased $5.7 million, or 25.7%,
to $28.1 million. Revenues from natural gas and pipeline
infrastructure services increased primarily as a result of
revenue contributions from Price Gregory, which was acquired on
October 1, 2009. These increases were partially offset by
lower revenues from telecommunications infrastructure services,
which decreased $20.4 million, or 17.9%, to
$93.6 million, primarily due to a decrease in spending by
our customers on their FTTx build-out initiatives.
Gross profit. Gross profit increased
$42.4 million, or 28.7%, to $190.0 million for the
three months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in
gross profit was predominantly due to the contribution of
revenues from natural gas and pipeline infrastructure services
in the third quarter of 2010 primarily resulting from the
acquisition of Price Gregory in the fourth quarter of 2009. As a
percentage of revenues, gross margin decreased to 15.8% for the
three months ended September 30, 2010 from 18.9% for the
three months ended September 30, 2009. The decrease in
gross margin was primarily due to decreases in gross margin in
both electric power and telecommunications infrastructure
services. Partially offsetting these decreases was an increase
in gross margins in natural gas and pipeline infrastructure
services. Although our natural gas and pipeline infrastructure
services margins were higher in the third quarter of 2010 than
the third quarter of 2009, these margins were still lower than
our overall gross margins and as a result, our overall gross
margins were negatively impacted by these services making up a
higher proportion of total revenues in the current period.
33
Selling, general and administrative
expenses. Selling, general and administrative
expenses increased $11.0 million, or 15.5%, to
$82.0 million for the three months ended September 30,
2010. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased
approximately $7.1 million as a result of the addition of
administrative expenses associated with Price Gregory, which was
acquired in the fourth quarter of 2009. Administrative expenses
also increased as a result of $2.1 million in higher
salaries and benefits costs from increased personnel, an
increase of approximately $2.1 million in professional fees
and other costs primarily related to ongoing legal matters and
an increase of $2.3 million in loss on sale of equipment.
These increases were partially offset by a decrease in incentive
compensation expenses of approximately $2.9 million
associated with current levels of operating activity. Selling,
general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues
decreased from 9.1% for the third quarter of 2009 to 6.8% for
the third quarter of 2010 primarily due to the increase in
revenues described above.
Amortization of intangible
assets. Amortization of intangible assets
increased $7.9 million to $13.4 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2010. This increase was
primarily due to increased amortization of backlog resulting
from the acquisition of Price Gregory on October 1, 2009.
Intangibles associated with backlog are amortized over the
period of estimated economic consumption and therefore
amortization was higher in the third quarter of 2010 as work
ramped up on certain contracts acquired as part of the Price
Gregory acquisition.
Interest expense. Interest expense for the
three months ended September 30, 2010 decreased
$2.5 million as compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2009, primarily due to the redemption of our
3.75% convertible subordinated notes due 2026 (3.75% Notes)
on May 14, 2010.
Interest income. Interest income was
$0.4 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2010,
compared to $0.3 million for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009. The increase results primarily from
higher interest rates, partially offset by a lower average cash
balance for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as
compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2009.
Provision for income taxes. The provision for
income taxes was $31.5 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2010, with an effective tax rate of 33.1% as
compared to $5.3 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 at an effective tax rate of 7.7%. We
recorded tax benefits of $9.4 million and
$22.4 million for the three months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009 due to decreases in reserves for uncertain tax
benefits resulting from the expiration of various federal and
state statutes of limitations.
Nine
months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the nine months
ended September 30, 2009
Revenues. Revenues increased
$492.1 million, or 21.1%, to $2.8 billion for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010. Natural gas and pipeline
infrastructure services revenues increased $570.6 million,
or 131.7%, to $1.0 billion, telecommunication
infrastructure services revenues increased $5.5 million, or
1.9%, to $289.5 million and fiber optic licensing revenues
increased $14.7 million, or 23.0%, to $78.8 million.
Revenues from natural gas and pipeline infrastructure services
increased primarily as a result of revenue contributions from
Price Gregory, which was acquired on October 1, 2009. These
increases were partially offset by lower revenues from electric
power infrastructure services, which decreased
$98.7 million, or 6.4%, to $1.5 billion, primarily due
to decreases in spending by our customers and the timing of
major transmission projects.
Gross profit. Gross profit increased
$72.6 million, or 18.0%, to $475.2 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010. The increase in gross
profit was predominantly due to the contribution of gas
transmission services revenues in the first nine months of 2010,
primarily as a result of the acquisition of Price Gregory. As a
percentage of revenues, gross margin decreased to 16.8% for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 from 17.3% for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009. The decrease in gross
margin was primarily due to decreases in gross margin in both
electric power and telecommunications infrastructure services.
Partially offsetting these decreases was an increase in gross
margins in natural gas and pipeline infrastructure services.
Although our natural gas and pipeline infrastructure services
margins were higher in the nine months ended September 30, 2010
than the nine months ended September 30, 2009, these margins
were still lower than our overall gross margins and as a result,
our overall gross margins were negatively impacted by these
services making up a higher proportion of total revenues in the
current period.
34
Selling, general and administrative
expenses. Selling, general and administrative
expenses increased $27.6 million, or 12.7%, to
$245.2 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased
approximately $20.9 million as a result of the addition of
administrative expenses associated with Price Gregory, which was
acquired in the fourth quarter of 2009. The remaining increase
primarily results from an increase of $3.9 million in
salaries and benefits costs resulting from increased personnel
and incentive compensation expenses associated with current
levels of operating activity, an increase of $2.8 million
in professional fees and costs primarily associated with ongoing
legal matters and acquisition activities and an increase of
$1.2 million associated with the ongoing implementation of
information technology solutions. These increases are partially
offset by a decrease in bad debt expense of $2.9 million in
the first nine months of 2010 as compared to the same period of
2009. Selling, general and administrative expenses as a
percentage of revenues decreased from 9.3% for the first nine
months of 2009 to 8.7% for the first nine months of 2010
primarily due to the increase in revenues described above.
Amortization of intangible
assets. Amortization of intangible assets
increased $13.1 million to $28.3 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010. This increase is primarily
due to increased amortization of intangibles resulting from the
acquisition of Price Gregory on October 1, 2009, partially
offset by reduced amortization expense from previously acquired
intangible assets as balances became fully amortized.
Interest expense. Interest expense for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 decreased
$3.8 million as compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, primarily due to the redemption of our
3.75% Notes on May 14, 2010 as described above.
Interest income. Interest income was
$1.2 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010, compared to $2.0 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. The decrease results primarily from
substantially lower interest rates, partially offset by a higher
average cash balance for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 as compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2009.
Loss on early extinguishment of debt. Loss on
early extinguishment of debt was $7.1 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010. The loss on early
extinguishment of debt is a result of the redemption of all of
the outstanding 3.75% Notes on May 14, 2010. This loss
includes a non-cash loss of $3.5 million related to the
difference between the net carrying value and the estimated fair
value of the 3.75% Notes calculated as of the date of
redemption, the payment of $2.3 million representing the
1.607% redemption premium above par value and a non-cash loss of
$1.3 million from the write-off of the remaining
unamortized deferred financing costs related to the
3.75% Notes.
Provision for income taxes. The provision for
income taxes was $70.3 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, with an effective tax rate of 36.7% as
compared to $45.0 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 with an effective tax rate of 27.4%. The
low effective tax rates for 2010 and 2009 result from
$9.4 million and $22.4 million of tax benefits
recorded in the third quarter of 2010 and 2009 associated with
the reversal of tax contingencies.
35
Segment
Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric Power
|
|
$
|
532,603
|
|
|
|
44.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
512,797
|
|
|
|
65.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,452,774
|
|
|
|
51.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,551,496
|
|
|
|
66.5
|
%
|
Natural Gas and Pipeline
|
|
|
551,674
|
|
|
|
45.7
|
|
|
|
131,628
|
|
|
|
16.9
|
|
|
|
1,003,728
|
|
|
|
35.5
|
|
|
|
433,138
|
|
|
|
18.6
|
|
Telecommunications
|
|
|
93,618
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
113,998
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
289,506
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
284,024
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
Fiber Optic Licensing
|
|
|
28,112
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
22,371
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
78,784
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
64,045
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated revenues from external customers
|
|
$
|
1,206,007
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
780,794
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,824,792
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,332,703
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric Power
|
|
$
|
60,361
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
66,778
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
150,567
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
178,768
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
Natural Gas and Pipeline
|
|
|
53,118
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
2,097
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
97,388
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
8,157
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
Telecommunications
|
|
|
5,605
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
12,317
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
|
|
12,499
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
18,684
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
Fiber Optic Licensing
|
|
|
13,266
|
|
|
|
47.2
|
|
|
|
11,757
|
|
|
|
52.6
|
|
|
|
39,265
|
|
|
|
49.8
|
|
|
|
32,023
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
Corporate and non-allocated costs
|
|
|
(37,789
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(21,787
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(98,043
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(67,942
|
)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated operating income
|
|
$
|
94,561
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
71,162
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
201,676
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
169,690
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the three
months ended September 30, 2009
Electric
Power Infrastructure Services Segment Results
Revenues for this segment increased $19.8 million, or 3.9%,
to $532.6 million for the quarter ended September 30,
2010. Revenues were positively impacted by increases in revenue
from electric power distribution services due to increased
customer spending, partially offset by lower electric power
transmission services revenues primarily due to the timing of
major transmission projects.
Operating income decreased $6.4 million, or 9.6%, to
$60.4 million for the quarter ended September 30,
2010, as compared to operating income of $66.8 million for
the third quarter of 2009. Operating income as a percentage of
revenues decreased to 11.3% for the quarter ended
September 30, 2010, from 13.0% for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009. These decreases are primarily due to
continued pricing pressures on our distribution projects and
certain higher margin transmission projects that were completed
in last years third quarter but were not replaced with
comparable margin projects this year, primarily as a result of
the timing of major projects.
Natural
Gas and Pipeline Infrastructure Services Segment
Results
Revenues for this segment increased $420.0 million, or
319.1%, to $551.7 million for the quarter ended
September 30, 2010. This increase in revenues is primarily
due to the contribution of natural gas transmission services
revenues in the third quarter of 2010 from the operations of
Price Gregory, which was acquired on October 1, 2009.
Operating income increased $51.0 million to
$53.1 million for the quarter ended September 30,
2010, as compared to operating income of $2.1 million for
the quarter ended September 30, 2009. Operating income as a
percentage of revenues increased to 9.6% for the quarter ended
September 30, 2010 from 1.6% for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009. These increases are primarily due to
the increased revenues discussed above, which include a greater
contribution of higher margin gas transmission services.
Telecommunications
Infrastructure Services Segment Results
Revenues for this segment decreased $20.4 million, or
17.9%, to $93.6 million for the quarter ended
September 30, 2010. This decrease in revenues is primarily
due to lower revenues from FTTx build-out initiatives as a
result of reduced capital spending by our customers in the third
quarter of 2010 as compared to the third quarter of 2009.
36
Operating income decreased $6.7 million, or 54.5%, to
$5.6 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2010,
as compared to operating income of $12.3 million for the
third quarter of 2009. Operating income as a percentage of
revenues decreased from 10.8% in the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 to 6.0% in the quarter ended
September 30, 2010. These decreases are primarily due to
lower revenues available to cover fixed costs and overall lower
margins on work performed in the third quarter of 2010 as
compared to the third quarter of 2009.
Fiber
Optic Licensing Segment Results
Revenues for this segment increased $5.7 million, or 25.7%,
to $28.1 million for the quarter ended September 30,
2010. This increase in revenues is primarily a result of our
continued network expansion and the associated revenues from
licensing the right to use
point-to-point
fiber optic telecommunications facilities.
Operating income increased $1.5 million, or 12.8%, to
$13.3 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2010
as a result of the increased revenues discussed above. Operating
income as a percentage of revenues decreased to 47.2% for the
quarter ended September 30, 2010, from 52.6% for the
quarter ended September 30, 2009. The decrease in operating
income as a percentage of revenues is primarily due to certain
contracts in the third quarter of 2010 with higher materials
procurement requirements on behalf of customers.
Corporate
and Non-allocated Costs
Certain selling, general and administrative expenses and
amortization of intangible assets are not allocated to segments.
Corporate and non-allocated costs for the quarter ended
September 30, 2010 increased $16.0 million, or 73.4%,
to $37.8 million primarily due to an increase of
$7.9 million in amortization expense of intangible assets
associated with acquisitions, $3.0 million of higher
salaries and related benefits expenses and $1.4 million in
additional professional fees and acquisition costs.
Nine
months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the nine months
ended September 30, 2009
Electric
Power Infrastructure Services Segment Results
Revenues for this segment decreased $98.7 million, or 6.4%,
to $1.4 billion for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010. Revenues were negatively impacted by
decreases in electric power distribution services revenues due
to reduced customer spending on maintenance, coupled with a
reduction in electric power transmission services related to the
timing of major transmission projects. Partially offsetting
these decreases was an increase in revenues from emergency
restoration services, which increased approximately
$15.7 million to $80.1 million in the first nine
months of 2010, primarily as a result of increased work
associated with ice storms in the Northeast United States during
the first quarter of 2010.
Operating income decreased $28.2 million, or 15.8%, to
$150.6 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010, as compared to $178.8 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, while operating income as a
percentage of revenues decreased to 10.4% for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, from 11.5% for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009. These decreases are primarily the
result of the reduced revenues described above, which had a
negative impact on this segments ability to cover fixed
costs, as well as the impact of a more competitive pricing
environment for smaller dollar transmission projects and for
certain distribution projects. In addition, margins were lower
on emergency restoration services performed in 2010 as compared
to 2009.
Natural
Gas and Pipeline Infrastructure Services Segment
Results
Revenues for this segment increased $570.6 million, or
131.7%, to $1.0 billion for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010. This increase in revenues is primarily
due to the contribution of natural gas transmission service
revenues in the current period from the operations of Price
Gregory, which was acquired on October 1, 2009.
Operating income increased $89.2 million to
$97.4 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010, as compared to operating income of $8.2 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Operating income
as a percentage of revenues increased to 9.7% for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 from 1.9% for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009. These increases are
primarily due to a change in the mix of services in the 2010
37
period as compared to the 2009 period as a result of the revenue
increase described above, with the 2010 period including a
greater volume of higher margin gas transmission services.
Telecommunications
Infrastructure Services Segment Results
Revenues for this segment increased $5.5 million, or 1.9%,
to $289.5 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010. This increase in revenues is primarily
due to increases in the volume of work associated with long-haul
fiber installation during the first nine months of 2010,
partially offset by lower revenues from FTTx build-out
initiatives as a result of reduced capital spending by our
customers in the 2010 period as compared to the 2009 period.
Operating income decreased $6.2 million, or 33.1%, to
$12.5 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010, as compared to operating income of $18.7 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Operating income
as a percentage of revenues decreased from 6.6% in the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 to 4.3% in the nine months
ended September 30, 2010. These decreases are primarily due
to the impact of losses incurred during the first quarter of
2010 as a result of weather related slowdowns impacting this
segments productivity and performance on various ongoing
jobs.
Fiber
Optic Licensing Segment Results
Revenues for this segment increased $14.7 million, or
23.0%, to $78.8 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010. This increase in revenues is primarily
a result of our continued network expansion and the associated
revenues from licensing the right to use
point-to-point
fiber optic telecommunications facilities.
Operating income increased $7.2 million, or 22.6%, to
$39.3 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010, as compared to operating income of $32.0 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009, resulting from
the increased revenues discussed above. Operating income as a
percentage of revenues was 49.8% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, which is consistent with 50.0% for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Corporate
and Non-allocated Costs
Certain selling, general and administrative expenses and
amortization of intangible assets are not allocated to segments.
Corporate and non-allocated costs for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 increased $30.1 million to
$98.0 million primarily due to increases of
$13.1 million in amortization expense of intangible assets
associated with acquisitions, approximately $10.7 million
in higher salaries and benefits costs from increased personnel
and incentive compensation expenses associated with current
levels of operating activity, an increase of $1.4 million
associated with increased acquisition activities and an increase
of $1.2 million in costs associated with the ongoing
implementation of information technology solutions.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Cash
Requirements
We anticipate that our cash and cash equivalents on hand, which
totaled $441.2 million as of September 30, 2010,
existing borrowing capacity under our credit facility, and our
future cash flows from operations will provide sufficient funds
to enable us to meet our future operating needs, debt service
requirements and planned capital expenditures, as well as
facilitate our ability to grow in the foreseeable future. We
also evaluate opportunities for strategic acquisitions from time
to time that may require cash. In addition, we evaluate
opportunities to make investments in customer-sponsored projects
where we anticipate performing engineering, procurement, or
construction services, and we believe such investments enhance
our ability to secure such services. These investment
opportunities exist in the markets and industries we serve and
may take the form of debt or equity investments, which may
require cash.
On May 14, 2010, we redeemed all of the $143.8 million
aggregate principal amount outstanding of our 3.75% Notes,
at a redemption price of 101.607% of the principal amount of the
notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date.
We paid the aggregate redemption price of approximately
$146.1 million, plus accrued and unpaid interest, using
cash on hand.
38
On October 25, 2010, we completed the acquisition of Valard
Construction LP and certain of its affiliated entities (Valard).
Valard provides electric power infrastructure services and is
located in Alberta, Canada. In connection with the acquisition,
we paid from cash on hand approximately $118.9 million to
the shareholders of Valard and repaid approximately
$12.5 million in debt owed by Valard on the date of
acquisition.
Management continues to monitor the financial markets and
general national and global economic conditions. We consider our
cash investment policies to be conservative in that we maintain
a diverse portfolio of what we believe to be high-quality cash
investments with short-term maturities. We were in compliance
with our covenants under our credit facility at
September 30, 2010. Accordingly, we do not anticipate that
the current weakness in the capital markets will have a material
impact on the principal amounts of our cash investments or our
ability to rely upon our existing credit facility for funds. To
date, we have experienced no loss or lack of access to our cash
or cash equivalents or funds under our credit facility; however,
we can provide no assurances that access to our invested cash
and cash equivalents will not be impacted in the future by
adverse conditions in the financial markets.
Capital expenditures are expected to be approximately
$170 million to $180 million for 2010. Approximately
$35 million to $45 million of the expected 2010
capital expenditures are targeted for the expansion of our fiber
optic network.
Sources
and Uses of Cash
As of September 30, 2010, we had cash and cash equivalents
of $441.2 million, working capital of $1.1 billion and
a nominal amount of long-term obligations. We also had
$191.2 million of letters of credit outstanding under our
credit facility, leaving $283.8 million available for
revolving loans or issuing new letters of credit.
Operating
Activities
Cash flow from operations is primarily influenced by demand for
our services, operating margins and the type of services we
provide, but can also be influenced by our working capital
needs, in particular on larger projects, due to the timing of
collection of receivables and the settlement of payables and
other obligations. Working capital needs are generally higher
during the summer and fall months due to increased demand for
our services when favorable weather conditions exist in certain
regions of the country. Conversely, working capital assets are
typically converted to cash during the winter months.
Net cash used by operating activities was $54.7 million
during the three months ended September 30, 2010 as
compared to net cash provided by operating activities of
$108.0 million during the three months ended
September 30, 2009. The decrease in operating cash flows
during the third quarter of 2010 as compared to the third
quarter of 2009 was primarily due to higher seasonal working
capital requirements during 2010 primarily related to the
ramp-up of
certain natural gas transmission projects.
Net cash used by operating activities was $21.3 million
during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared
to net cash provided by operating activities of
$278.6 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. The decrease in operating cash flows
during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared
to the same period in 2009 was primarily due to the collection
in the first quarter of 2009 of significantly higher receivable
balances that were outstanding at the end of 2008 partially as a
result of the higher level of emergency restoration work
performed in the fourth quarter of 2008. Also contributing to
the decrease in operating cash flows during the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in
2009 were increased working capital requirements in the 2010
period associated with an increased number of large natural gas
transmission projects during the period.
Investing
Activities
In the three months ended September 30, 2010, we used net
cash in investing activities of $24.5 million as compared
to $48.1 million used in investing activities in the three
months ended September 30, 2009. Investing activities in
the third quarter of 2010 included $31.7 million used for
capital expenditures, partially offset by $7.1 million of
proceeds from the sale of equipment. Investing activities in the
third quarter of 2009 included
39
$36.0 million used for capital expenditures and
$14.1 million in net cash outlays for acquisitions,
partially offset by $2.1 million of proceeds from the sale
of equipment.
In the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we used net
cash in investing activities of $92.8 million as compared
to $130.2 million used in investing activities in the nine
months ended September 30, 2009. Investing activities in
the nine months ended September 30, 2010 included
$114.0 million used for capital expenditures, partially
offset by $21.3 million of proceeds from the sale of
equipment. Investing activities in the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 included $120.9 million used for
capital expenditures and $14.1 million in net cash outlays
for acquisitions, partially offset by $4.8 million of
proceeds from the sale of equipment.
Financing
Activities
In the three months ended September 30, 2010, net cash used
in financing activities was $0.1 million as compared to
$0.6 million provided by financing activities in the three
months ended September 30, 2009. Financing activities in
the third quarter of 2009 included $0.5 million received
from the exercise of stock options and $0.1 million of tax
benefit from the vesting of stock-based equity awards.
In the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we used net
cash in financing activities of $144.7 million as compared
to $2.1 million used in financing activities in the nine
months ended September 30, 2009. Financing activities in
the nine months ended September 30, 2010 included
$143.8 million in payments for the redemption of our
3.75% Notes, described above and in Note 7 to our
condensed consolidated financial statements, as well as
$3.4 million in net repayments of other borrowings during
the first nine months of 2010. These outflows were partially
offset by $2.0 million in tax impact from stock-based
equity awards and $0.5 million received from the exercise
of stock options. Financing activities in the first nine months
of 2009 included $1.6 million in tax impact from
stock-based equity awards and $1.2 million used in net
repayments of borrowings.
Debt
Instruments
Credit
Facility
We have an agreement with various lenders that provides for a
$475.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility
maturing on September 19, 2012. Subject to the conditions
specified in the credit facility, borrowings under the credit
facility are to be used for working capital, capital
expenditures and other general corporate purposes. The entire
unused portion of the credit facility is available for the
issuance of letters of credit.
As of September 30, 2010, we had approximately
$191.2 million of letters of credit issued under the credit
facility and no outstanding revolving loans. The remaining
$283.8 million was available for revolving loans or issuing
new letters of credit. Amounts borrowed under the credit
facility bear interest, at our option, at a rate equal to either
(a) the Eurodollar Rate (as defined in the credit facility)
plus 0.875% to 1.75%, as determined by the ratio of our total
funded debt to consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the credit
facility), or (b) the base rate (as described below) plus
0.00% to 0.75%, as determined by the ratio of our total funded
debt to consolidated EBITDA. Letters of credit issued under the
credit facility are subject to a letter of credit fee of 0.875%
to 1.75%, based on the ratio of our total funded debt to
consolidated EBITDA. We are also subject to a commitment fee of
0.15% to 0.35%, based on the ratio of our total funded debt to
consolidated EBITDA, on any unused availability under the credit
facility. The base rate equals the higher of (i) the
Federal Funds Rate (as defined in the credit facility) plus
1/2
of 1% or (ii) the banks prime rate.
The credit facility contains certain covenants, including
covenants with respect to maximum funded debt to consolidated
EBITDA, maximum senior debt to consolidated EBITDA and minimum
interest coverage, in each case as specified in the credit
facility. For purposes of calculating the maximum funded debt to
consolidated EBITDA ratio and the maximum senior debt to
consolidated EBITDA ratio, our maximum funded debt and maximum
senior debt are reduced by all cash and cash equivalents (as
defined in the credit facility) held by us in excess of
$25.0 million. As of September 30, 2010, we were in
compliance with all of its covenants. The credit facility limits
certain acquisitions, mergers and consolidations, capital
expenditures, asset sales and prepayments of indebtedness and,
subject to certain exceptions, prohibits liens on material
assets. The credit facility also limits the payment of dividends
and stock repurchase programs in any fiscal year except those
payments or other distributions
40
payable solely in capital stock. The credit facility provides
for customary events of default and carries cross-default
provisions with our continuing indemnity and security agreement
with our sureties and all of our other debt instruments
exceeding $15.0 million in borrowings. If an event of
default (as defined in the credit facility) occurs and is
continuing, on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth
in the credit facility, amounts outstanding under the credit
facility may be accelerated and may become or be declared
immediately due and payable.
The credit facility is secured by a pledge of all of the capital
stock of our U.S. subsidiaries, 65% of the capital stock of
our foreign subsidiaries and substantially all of our assets.
Our U.S. subsidiaries guarantee the repayment of all
amounts due under the credit facility.
3.75% Convertible
Subordinated Notes
Since May 14, 2010, none of our 3.75% Notes were
outstanding. The 3.75% Notes were originally issued in
April 2006 for an aggregate principal amount of
$143.8 million and required semi-annual interest payments
on April 30 and October 30 until maturity.
On May 14, 2010, we redeemed all of the $143.8 million
aggregate principal amount outstanding of the 3.75% Notes
at a redemption price of 101.607% of the principal amount of the
notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including,
the date of redemption. The redemption resulted in the payment
of the aggregate redemption price of $146.1 million and the
recognition of a loss on extinguishment of debt of approximately
$7.1 million. Included in the loss on early extinguishment
of debt was a non-cash loss of $3.5 million related to the
difference between the net carrying value and the estimated fair
value of the 3.75% Notes calculated as of the date of
redemption, the payment of $2.3 million representing the
1.607% redemption premium above par value and a non-cash loss of
$1.3 million from the write-off of the remaining
unamortized deferred financing costs related to the
3.75% Notes. Additionally, the redemption of all of the
outstanding 3.75% Notes is expected to result prospectively
in the elimination of approximately $6.7 million in
aggregate 2011 annual cash and non-cash interest expense, net of
tax.
The $126.6 million of convertible subordinated notes on the
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 was
presented net of a debt discount of $17.2 million, which
was being amortized as interest expense. The effective interest
rate that was used to calculate total interest expense for the
3.75% Notes was 7.85%.
Off-Balance
Sheet Transactions
As is common in our industry, we have entered into certain
off-balance sheet arrangements in the ordinary course of
business that result in risks not directly reflected in our
balance sheets. Our significant off-balance sheet transactions
include liabilities associated with non-cancelable operating
leases, letter of credit obligations, commitments to expand our
fiber optic networks, surety guarantees, multi-employer pension
plan liabilities and obligations relating to our joint venture
arrangements. Two of our operating units operate in separate
joint venture structures which contain risks not directly
reflected in our balance sheets. In association with one of
these joint ventures, we have guaranteed all of the obligations
of the joint venture under the contract with the customer.
Additionally, our second joint venture arrangement qualifies as
a general partnership, for which we are jointly and severally
liable for all of the obligations of the joint venture. In each
of these joint venture arrangements, each joint venturer has
indemnified the other party for any liabilities incurred in
excess of the liabilities for which the joint venturer is
obligated to bear under the respective joint venture agreement.
Other than as previously discussed, we have not engaged in any
off-balance sheet financing arrangements through special purpose
entities, and we have no other material guarantees of the work
or obligations of third parties.
Leases
We enter into non-cancelable operating leases for many of our
facility, vehicle and equipment needs. These leases allow us to
conserve cash by paying a monthly lease rental fee for use of
facilities, vehicles and equipment rather than purchasing them.
We may decide to cancel or terminate a lease before the end of
its term, in which case we are typically liable to the lessor
for the remaining lease payments under the term of the lease.
41
We have guaranteed the residual value of the underlying assets
under certain of our equipment operating leases at the date of
termination of such leases. We have agreed to pay any difference
between this residual value and the fair market value of each
underlying asset as of the lease termination date. As of
September 30, 2010, the maximum guaranteed residual value
was approximately $118.0 million. We believe that no
significant payments will be made as a result of the difference
between the fair market value of the leased equipment and the
guaranteed residual value. However, there can be no assurance
that future significant payments will not be required.
Letters
of Credit
Certain of our vendors require letters of credit to ensure
reimbursement for amounts they are disbursing on our behalf,
such as to beneficiaries under our self-funded insurance
programs. In addition, from time to time some customers require
us to post letters of credit to ensure payment to our
subcontractors and vendors under those contracts and to
guarantee performance under our contracts. Such letters of
credit are generally issued by a bank or similar financial
institution. The letter of credit commits the issuer to pay
specified amounts to the holder of the letter of credit if the
holder demonstrates that we have failed to perform specified
actions. If this were to occur, we would be required to
reimburse the issuer of the letter of credit. Depending on the
circumstances of such a reimbursement, we may also have to
record a charge to earnings for the reimbursement. We do not
believe that it is likely that any claims will be made under a
letter of credit in the foreseeable future.
As of September 30, 2010, we had $191.2 million in
letters of credit outstanding under our credit facility
primarily to secure obligations under our casualty insurance
program. These are irrevocable stand-by letters of credit with
maturities generally expiring at various times throughout 2010
and 2011. Upon maturity, it is expected that the majority of
these letters of credit will be renewed for subsequent one-year
periods.
Performance
Bonds and Parent Guarantees
Many customers, particularly in connection with new
construction, require us to post performance and payment bonds
issued by a financial institution known as a surety. These bonds
provide a guarantee to the customer that we will perform under
the terms of a contract and that we will pay subcontractors and
vendors. If we fail to perform under a contract or to pay
subcontractors and vendors, the customer may demand that the
surety make payments or provide services under the bond. We must
reimburse the surety for any expenses or outlays it incurs.
Under our continuing indemnity and security agreement with our
sureties and with the consent of our lenders under our credit
facility, we have granted security interests in certain of our
assets to collateralize our obligations to the sureties. In
addition, we have assumed obligations with other sureties with
respect to bonds issued on behalf of acquired companies that
were outstanding as of the applicable dates of acquisition. To
the extent these bonds have not expired or been replaced, we may
be required to transfer to the applicable sureties certain of
our assets as collateral in the event of a default under these
other agreements. We may be required to post letters of credit
or other collateral in favor of the sureties or our customers in
the future. Posting letters of credit in favor of the sureties
or our customers would reduce the borrowing availability under
our credit facility. To date, we have not been required to make
any reimbursements to our sureties for bond-related costs. We
believe that it is unlikely that we will have to fund
significant claims under our surety arrangements in the
foreseeable future. As of September 30, 2010, the total
amount of outstanding performance bonds was approximately
$1.1 billion, and the estimated cost to complete these
bonded projects was approximately $246.1 million.
From time to time, we guarantee the obligations of our wholly
owned subsidiaries, including obligations under certain
contracts with customers, certain lease obligations and, in some
states, obligations in connection with obtaining
contractors licenses. We have also guaranteed the
obligations of our wholly owned subsidiary under the joint
venture arrangement with a third party engineering company,
which is described in the accompanying notes to the condensed
consolidated financial statements.
42
Contractual
Obligations
As of September 30, 2010, our future contractual
obligations are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
of 2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
$
|
119,416
|
|
|
$
|
12,699
|
|
|
$
|
39,195
|
|
|
$
|
25,841
|
|
|
$
|
18,916
|
|
|
$
|
9,400
|
|
|
$
|
13,365
|
|
Committed capital expenditures for fiber optic networks under
contracts with customers
|
|
|
19,454
|
|
|
|
10,706
|
|
|
|
8,748
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
138,870
|
|
|
$
|
23,405
|
|
|
$
|
47,943
|
|
|
$
|
25,841
|
|
|
$
|
18,916
|
|
|
$
|
9,400
|
|
|
$
|
13,365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The committed capital expenditures for fiber optic networks
represent commitments related to signed contracts with
customers. The amounts are estimates of costs required to build
the networks under contract. The actual capital expenditures
related to building the networks could vary materially from
these estimates.
As of September 30, 2010, the total unrecognized tax
benefit related to uncertain tax positions was
$48.5 million. We estimate that none of this will be paid
within the next twelve months. However, we believe that it is
reasonably possible that within the next twelve months
unrecognized tax benefits may decrease up to $9.0 million
due to the expiration of certain statutes of limitations. We are
unable to make reasonably reliable estimates regarding the
timing of future cash outflows, if any, associated with the
remaining unrecognized tax benefits.
The above table does not reflect estimated contractual
obligations under the multi-employer pension plans in which our
union employees participate. Certain of our operating units are
parties to various collective bargaining agreements that require
us to provide to the employees subject to these agreements
specified wages and benefits, as well as to make contributions
to multi-employer pension plans. Our multi-employer pension plan
contribution rates are determined annually and assessed on a
pay-as-you-go basis based on our union employee
payrolls, which cannot be determined for future periods because
the location and number of union employees that we have employed
at any given time and the plans in which they may participate
vary depending on the projects we have ongoing at any time and
the need for union resources in connection with those projects.
Additionally, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of
1974, as amended by the Multi-Employer Pension Plan Amendments
Act of 1980, imposes certain liabilities upon employers who are
contributors to a multi-employer plan in the event of the
employers withdrawal from, or upon termination of, such
plan. None of our operating units have any current plans to
withdraw from these plans, and accordingly, no withdrawal
liabilities are reflected in the above table. We may also be
required to make additional contributions to our multi-employer
pension plans if they become underfunded, and these additional
contributions will be determined based on our union employee
payrolls. The Pension Protection Act of 2006 added new funding
rules generally applicable to plan years beginning after 2007
for multi-employer plans that are classified as
endangered, seriously endangered, or
critical status. For a plan in critical status,
additional required contributions and benefit reductions apply.
We have been notified that two plans to which a Quanta operating
unit contributes are in critical status, one of
which requires additional contributions in the form of a
surcharge on future benefit contributions required for future
work performed by union employees covered by this plan. The
amount of additional funds that we may be obligated to
contribute to this plan in the future cannot be estimated and is
not included in the above table, as such amounts will be based
on future levels of work that require the specific use of those
union employees covered by this plan. No additional
contributions are required for the other plan in critical status.
Self-Insurance
We are insured for employers liability, general liability,
auto liability and workers compensation claims. As of
August 1, 2010, all policies were renewed with deductibles
continuing at existing levels of $5.0 million per
occurrence, other than employers liability, which
continues to be subject to a deductible of $1.0 million. We
also have employee healthcare benefit plans for most employees
not subject to collective bargaining agreements, of which the
primary plan is subject to a deductible of $350,000 per claimant
per year. For the policy year ended July 31, 2009,
employers liability claims were subject to a deductible of
$1.0 million per occurrence, general
43
liability and auto liability claims were subject to a deductible
of $3.0 million per occurrence, and workers
compensation claims were subject to a deductible of
$2.0 million per occurrence. Additionally, for the policy
year ended July 31, 2009, our workers compensation
claims were subject to an annual cumulative aggregate liability
of up to $1.0 million on claims in excess of
$2.0 million per occurrence.
Losses under all of these insurance programs are accrued based
upon our estimate of the ultimate liability for claims reported
and an estimate of claims incurred but not reported, with
assistance from third-party actuaries. These insurance
liabilities are difficult to assess and estimate due to unknown
factors, including the severity of an injury, the determination
of our liability in proportion to other parties, the number of
incidents not reported and the effectiveness of our safety
program. The accruals are based upon known facts and historical
trends and management believes such accruals to be adequate. As
of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the gross
amount accrued for insurance claims totaled $142.8 million
and $153.6 million, with $101.5 million and
$109.8 million considered to be long-term and included in
other non-current liabilities. Related insurance
recoveries/receivables as of September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 were $26.5 million and
$33.7 million, of which $9.4 million and
$13.4 million are included in prepaid expenses and other
current assets and $17.1 million and $20.3 million are
included in other assets, net.
We renew our insurance policies on an annual basis, and
therefore deductibles and levels of insurance coverage may
change in future periods. In addition, insurers may cancel our
coverage or determine to exclude certain items from coverage, or
the cost to obtain such coverage may become unreasonable. In any
such event, our overall risk exposure would increase, which
could negatively affect our results of operations and financial
condition.
Concentration
of Credit Risk
We are subject to concentrations of credit risk related
primarily to our cash and cash equivalents and our accounts
receivable, including amounts related to unbilled accounts
receivable and costs and estimated earnings in excess of
billings on uncompleted contracts. Substantially all of our cash
investments are managed by what we believe to be high credit
quality financial institutions. In accordance with our
investment policies, these institutions are authorized to invest
this cash in a diversified portfolio of what we believe to be
high quality investments, which primarily include
interest-bearing demand deposits, money market mutual funds and
investment grade commercial paper with original maturities of
three months or less. Although we do not currently believe the
principal amount of these investments is subject to any material
risk of loss, the weakness in the economy has significantly
impacted the interest income we receive from these investments
and is likely to continue to do so in the future. In addition,
we grant credit under normal payment terms, generally without
collateral, to our customers, which include electric power,
natural gas and pipeline companies, telecommunications and cable
television system operators, governmental entities, general
contractors, and builders, owners and managers of commercial and
industrial properties located primarily in the United States.
Consequently, we are subject to potential credit risk related to
changes in business and economic factors throughout the United
States, which may be heightened as a result of ongoing depressed
economic and financial market conditions. However, we generally
have certain statutory lien rights with respect to services
provided. Under certain circumstances, such as foreclosures or
negotiated settlements, we may take title to the underlying
assets in lieu of cash in settlement of receivables. In such
circumstances, extended time frames may be required to liquidate
these assets, causing the amounts realized to differ from the
value of the assumed receivable. Historically, some of our
customers have experienced significant financial difficulties,
and others may experience financial difficulties in the future.
These difficulties expose us to increased risk related to
collectability of receivables and costs and estimated earnings
in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts for services we
have performed. Two customers accounted for approximately 18%
and 15% of consolidated revenues during the three months ended
September 30, 2010, and one of these customers accounted
for approximately 11% of revenues during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010. These two customers represented
approximately 14% and 11% of billed and accrued receivables at
September 30, 2010. Revenues from these customers are
included in the Natural Gas and Pipeline Infrastructure Services
segment. No other customer represented 10% or more of revenues
during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010.
No customers represented 10% or more of revenues during the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 or of
accounts receivable at December 31, 2009.
44
Litigation
We are from time to time party to various lawsuits, claims and
other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of
business. These actions typically seek, among other things,
compensation for alleged personal injury, breach of contract
and/or
property damages, punitive damages, civil penalties or other
losses, or injunctive or declaratory relief. With respect to all
such lawsuits, claims and proceedings, we record reserves when
it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount
of loss can be reasonably estimated. None of these proceedings,
separately or in the aggregate, are expected to have a material
adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations
or cash flows.
Related
Party Transactions
In the normal course of business, we enter into transactions
from time to time with related parties. These transactions
typically take the form of facility leases with prior owners of
certain acquired companies and payables to prior owners who are
now employees.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements. On
January 1, 2010, we adopted new standards aimed to improve
the visibility of off-balance sheet vehicles previously exempt
from consolidation and address practice issues involving the
accounting for transfers of financial assets as sales or secured
borrowings. The impact from the adoption of these new standards
was not material.
Outlook
We and our customers are operating in a difficult business
environment in light of the slow economy and uncertainty in the
capital markets. Our customers are also facing stringent
regulatory processes as they implement projects to enhance their
infrastructure, which has resulted in reductions or delays in
spending in 2010. These economic and regulatory factors have
negatively affected our results to date in 2010, as well as our
expectations for the fourth quarter of 2010. We believe,
however, that economic conditions are beginning to improve and
activity and spending in the industries we serve will begin to
increase in 2011, although the regulatory obstacles our
customers must overcome create continuing uncertainty as to the
timing of spending. We continue to be optimistic, however, about
our long-term opportunities in each of the industries we serve,
and we believe that our financial and operational strengths will
enable us to manage the challenges and uncertainties created by
the adverse economic and market conditions.
Electric
Power Infrastructure Services Segment
The North American electric grid is aging and requires
significant upgrades to meet future demands for power. Over the
past several years, many utilities across the country have begun
to implement plans to improve their transmission systems. As a
result, new construction, structure change-outs, line upgrades
and maintenance projects on many transmission systems are
occurring or planned. In addition, we anticipate that utilities
will continue to integrate smart grid technologies
into their transmission and distribution systems to improve grid
management and create efficiencies. Over the past two years, we
have seen a slowdown in spending by our customers on their
distribution systems, which we believe is due primarily to
adverse economic and market conditions, and although we have
seen some increase in spending in the third quarter of 2010, we
expect distribution spending to remain at low levels throughout
2010. We have also seen some delays in transmission projects
currently proposed, primarily due to regulatory processes. As an
indirect result of the economic downturn, overall demand for
electricity has decreased, which could also affect the timing
and scope of transmission and distribution spending by our
customers on their existing systems or planned projects. We
believe, however, that utilities remain committed to the
expansion and strengthening of their transmission
infrastructure, with planning, engineering and funding for many
of their projects in place, and to date we have not seen the
current economic conditions negatively impact our
customers plans for spending on transmission expansion,
with demand for electricity and the need for reliability
expected to increase over the long-term. As a result of these
and other factors, including the renewable energy initiatives
discussed below, we anticipate a continued shift over the
long-term in our electric power service mix to a greater
45
proportion of high-voltage electric power transmission and
substation projects. Many of these projects have a long-term
horizon, and timing and scope can be affected by numerous
factors, including regulatory permitting, siting and
right-of-way
issues, environmental approvals and economic and market
conditions.
We believe that opportunities also exist as a result of
renewable energy initiatives. State renewable portfolio
standards, which set required or voluntary standards for how
much power is required to be generated from renewable energy
sources, as well as general environmental concerns, are driving
the development of renewable energy projects, with a stronger
focus currently on utility-scale and distributed solar projects.
Tax incentives and government stimulus funds are also expected
to encourage development. We expect the construction of
renewable energy facilities, including wind and solar power
generation sources, to result in the need for additional
transmission lines and substations to transport the power from
the facilities, which are often in remote locations, to demand
centers. We also believe opportunities exist for us to provide
engineering, project management, materials procurement and
installation services for renewable projects, as reflected by
recent awards to us of contracts for these services on various
utility-scale solar facilities. However, the economic
feasibility of renewable energy projects, and therefore the
attractiveness of investment in the projects, may depend on the
availability of tax incentive programs or the ability of the
projects to take advantage of such incentives, and there is no
assurance that the government will extend existing tax
incentives or create new incentive or funding programs.
Furthermore, to the extent that renewable energy projects are
developed to satisfy mandatory state renewable portfolio
standards, spending on such projects would likely decline if
states were to lessen those standards. Additionally, the timing
of investments in renewable energy projects and related
infrastructure could be affected by regulatory permitting
processes and siting issues, as well as capital constraints if
the financial markets worsen or remain stagnant. Overall
renewable energy spending has declined since the latter part of
2008, due in part to slow government funding and tight credit
markets. However, we realized some increased spending in the
fourth quarter of 2009 and throughout 2010, and we expect future
spending on renewable energy initiatives to continue to increase
in 2011 and beyond.
We believe that certain provisions of the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), enacted in February 2009, will
also increase demand for our services over the long-term. The
economic stimulus programs under the ARRA include incentives in
the form of grants, loans, tax cuts and tax credits for
renewable energy, energy efficiency and electric power and
telecommunications infrastructure. Additionally, loan guarantee
programs partially funded through the ARRA and cash grant
programs have recently been implemented for renewable energy and
transmission reliability and efficiency projects. For example,
in October 2009, approximately $3.4 billion in cash grants
were awarded to foster the transition to a smarter
electric grid. We anticipate investments in many of these
initiatives to create opportunities for our operations, although
many projects are waiting on government funding. While we cannot
predict with certainty the timing of the implementation of the
programs under the ARRA, the funding of stimulus projects or the
scope of projects once funding is received, we anticipate
projects to have aggressive deployment schedules due to the
deadlines under the stimulus plan, resulting in increased
opportunities in the near term.
Several existing or pending legislative or regulatory actions
may also positively affect demand for the services provided by
this segment in the long-term, in particular in connection with
electric power infrastructure and renewable energy spending. For
example, legislative or regulatory action that alleviates some
of the siting and
right-of-way
challenges that impact transmission projects would potentially
accelerate future transmission projects. We also anticipate
increased infrastructure spending by our customers as a result
of legislation requiring the power industry to meet federal
reliability standards for its transmission and distribution
systems and providing further incentives to the industry to
invest in and improve maintenance on its systems. Additionally,
the proposed federal renewable portfolio standard could further
advance the installation of renewable generation facilities and
related electric transmission infrastructure. It is uncertain,
however, if or when pending legislation or regulations will be
effective or whether the potentially beneficial provisions we
highlight in this outlook will be included in the final
legislation, and this uncertainty could affect our
customers decisions regarding potential projects and the
timing thereof.
Several industry and market trends are also prompting customers
in the electric power industry to seek outsourcing partners.
These trends include an aging utility workforce, increasing
costs and labor issues. The need to ensure available labor
resources for larger projects is also driving strategic
relationships with customers.
46
Natural
Gas and Pipeline Infrastructure Services Segment
We also see potential growth opportunities over the long-term in
our natural gas and pipeline operations, primarily in natural
gas and oil pipeline installation and maintenance and related
services such as gas gathering and pipeline integrity. We
believe our acquisition of Price Gregory, which significantly
expanded our services in this segment and positioned us as a
leading provider of transmission pipeline infrastructure
services in North America, will allow us to take advantage of
these opportunities. However, the natural gas industry is
cyclical as a result of fluctuations in natural gas prices, and
over the past twelve months, spending in this industry has been
negatively impacted by lower natural gas prices, a reduction in
the development of natural gas resources, regulatory permitting
processes and capital constraints. We believe that the cyclical
nature of this business can be somewhat normalized by
opportunities associated with an increase in the ongoing
development of unconventional shale formations that produce
natural gas
and/or oil,
which will require the construction of transmission pipeline
infrastructure to connect production with demand centers.
Additionally, we believe the goals of clean energy and energy
independence for the United States will make abundant, low-cost
natural gas the fuel of choice to replace coal for power
generation until renewable energy becomes a significant part of
the overall generation of electricity, creating the demand for
additional production of natural gas and the need for related
infrastructure. In the past, our natural gas operations have
been challenged by lower margins overall, due in part to the
impact to our natural gas distribution services from declines in
new housing construction. As a result, as evidenced by our
acquisition of Price Gregory, we have primarily focused our
efforts on transmission pipeline opportunities and other more
profitable services, and we are optimistic about these
operations in the future. The timing and scope of projects could
be affected, however, by economic and market conditions as well
as lower natural gas prices and regulatory requirements,
especially in the near-term.
Telecommunications
Infrastructure Services Segment
In connection with our telecommunications services, we expect
increasing opportunities in the future as $7.2 billion in
stimulus funding for broadband deployment to underserved areas
is awarded to municipalities, states and rural telephone
companies, some of which are long-standing customers.
Approximately $3.0 billion in funding has been awarded
under the ARRA for numerous broadband deployment projects across
the U.S., and the balance is expected to be awarded within the
next few months. However, to receive funding for these projects,
certain awardees may be required to file environmental impact
statements, which may delay projects. If funding is delayed, the
demand for our telecommunications services will be affected.
Although the timing of funding is uncertain, once funding is
received, projects are expected to be rapidly deployed to meet
stimulus deadlines, which we anticipate will increase spending
in late 2010 and into 2011. We also anticipate spending by our
customers on fiber optic backhaul to provide links
from wireless cell sites to broader voice, data and video
networks. Additionally, we believe opportunities exist in the
long-term as a result of the continued deployment of fiber to
the premises and fiber to the node, or FTTx, by wireline
carriers and government organizations, although we have seen a
significant slowdown in FTTx deployment since the second quarter
of 2008. We anticipate that these opportunities will continue to
be limited throughout 2010, with the possibility of some
increase in spending for FTTx deployment in 2011. If economic
and market conditions remain stagnant or further deteriorate,
however, deployment spending could be further limited or
delayed. In connection with our wireless services, several
wireless companies have announced plans to increase their cell
site deployments over the next few years, including the
expansion of next generation technology. In particular, the
transition to 4G and LTE (long-term evolution) technology by
wireless service providers will require the enhancement of their
networks. Each of these opportunities is anticipated to increase
demand for our telecommunications services over the long-term,
with the timing and amount of spending from these opportunities
being dependent on future economic, market and regulatory
conditions.
We anticipate that the future initiatives by the
telecommunication carriers will serve as a catalyst for the
cable industry to begin a new network upgrade cycle to expand
its service offerings in an effort to retain and attract
customers; however, the timing of any upgrades is uncertain.
Fiber
Optic Licensing Segment
Our Fiber Optic Licensing segment is experiencing growth
primarily through geographic expansion, with a focus on markets
where secure high-speed networks are important, such as
enterprises, communications carriers and educational, financial
services and healthcare institutions. We continue to see
opportunities for growth both in
47
the markets we currently serve and new markets, although we
cannot predict the adverse impact, if any, of the ongoing
economic downturn on these growth opportunities. To support the
growth in this business, we anticipate the need for continued
capital expenditures. Our Fiber Optic Licensing segment
typically generates higher margins than our other operations,
but we can give no assurance that the Fiber Optic Licensing
segment margins will continue at historical levels.
Conclusion
Spending by our customers declined in 2009 and has remained slow
throughout 2010; however, we are seeing growth opportunities
beginning in 2011 in our electric transmission, gas
transmission, telecommunications, renewables and fiber licensing
operations despite negative forces from the economic recession
and heightened regulatory requirements. We expect spending on
electric distribution services to remain at low levels
throughout 2010, although there was an increase in these
services in the third quarter of 2010. We are continuing to see
reduced or stagnant spending for our gas distribution services,
which have been affected by the current economic conditions. The
weakness in the capital markets has also negatively affected
some of our customers plans for projects, and it may
continue to do so in the future, which could delay, reduce or
suspend future projects if funding is not available. However, we
do not believe these factors are material or will affect revenue
growth in 2011 and beyond. We anticipate that utilities will
increase spending on projects to upgrade and build out their
transmission systems and outsource more of their work, due in
part to their aging workforce issues. We believe that we remain
the partner of choice for many utilities in need of broad
infrastructure expertise, specialty equipment and workforce
resources. We also believe that we are one of the largest
full-service solution providers of natural gas transmission and
distribution services in North America, which positions us to
leverage opportunities in the natural gas industry. Furthermore,
as new technologies emerge in the future for communications and
digital services such as voice, video and data,
telecommunications and cable service providers are expected to
work quickly to deploy fast, next-generation fiber and wireless
networks, and we are recognized as a key partner in deploying
these services.
We also expect to continue to see our margins generally improve
over the long-term as a result of our margin enhancement
strategies, although reductions in spending by our customers
could further negatively affect our margins, with the most
significant impact to our telecommunications operations and
natural gas and electric power distribution services.
Additionally, margins may be negatively impacted on a quarterly
basis due to adverse weather conditions and other factors as
described in Understanding Margins above. We
continue to focus on the elements of the business we can
control, including costs, the margins we accept on projects,
collecting receivables, ensuring quality service and rightsizing
initiatives to match the markets we serve.
Capital expenditures for 2010 are expected to be approximately
$170 million to $180 million, of which approximately
$35 million to $45 million of these expenditures are
targeted for fiber optic network expansion with the majority of
the remaining expenditures for operating equipment. We expect
2010 capital expenditures to continue to be funded substantially
through internal cash flows and cash on hand.
We continue to evaluate other potential strategic acquisitions
or investments to broaden our customer base, expand our
geographic area of operation and grow our portfolio of services.
We believe that additional attractive acquisition candidates
exist primarily as a result of the highly fragmented nature of
the industry, the inability of many companies to expand and
modernize due to capital constraints and the desire of owners
for liquidity. We consider that our financial strength and
experienced management team will be attractive to acquisition
candidates.
We believe certain international regions also present
significant opportunities for growth across many of our
operations. We are strategically evaluating ways in which we can
apply our expertise to strengthen the infrastructure in various
foreign countries where infrastructure enhancements are
increasingly important. For example, we are actively pursuing
opportunities in growth markets where we can leverage our
technology or proprietary work methods, such as our energized
services, to establish a presence in these markets.
We believe that we are adequately positioned to capitalize upon
opportunities and trends in the industries we serve because of
our proven full-service operations with broad geographic reach,
financial capability and technical expertise. Additionally, we
believe that these industry opportunities and trends will
increase the demand for our services over the long-term;
however, we cannot predict the actual timing, magnitude or
impact these
48
opportunities and trends will have on our operating results and
financial position, especially in light of the slow economy,
weak capital markets and regulatory environment.
Uncertainty
of Forward-Looking Statements and Information
This Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
includes forward-looking statements reflecting
assumptions, expectations, projections, intentions or beliefs
about future events that are intended to qualify for the
safe harbor from liability established by the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You can
identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate
strictly to historical or current facts. They use words such as
anticipate, estimate,
project, forecast, may,
will, should, could,
expect, believe, plan,
intend and other words of similar meaning. In
particular, these include, but are not limited to, statements
relating to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Projected operating or financial results;
|
|
|
|
The effects of any acquisitions and divestitures we may make,
including the acquisitions of Price Gregory and Valard;
|
|
|
|
Expectations regarding our business outlook, growth and capital
expenditures;
|
|
|
|
The effects of competition in our markets;
|
|
|
|
The benefits of renewable energy initiatives, the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) and other existing
or potential energy legislation;
|
|
|
|
The current economic conditions and trends in the industries we
serve; and
|
|
|
|
Our ability to achieve cost savings.
|
These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future
performance and involve or rely on a number of risks,
uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult to predict or
beyond our control. We have based our forward-looking statements
on our managements beliefs and assumptions based on
information available to our management at the time the
statements are made. We caution you that actual outcomes and
results may differ materially from what is expressed, implied or
forecasted by our forward-looking statements and that any or all
of our forward-looking statements may turn out to be wrong.
Those statements can be affected by inaccurate assumptions and
by known or unknown risks and uncertainties, including the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly variations in our operating results;
|
|
|
|
Adverse economic and financial conditions, including weakness in
the capital markets;
|
|
|
|
Trends and growth opportunities in relevant markets;
|
|
|
|
Delays, reductions in scope or cancellations of existing or
pending projects, including as a result of regulatory processes
or capital constraints that may impact our customers;
|
|
|
|
The impact of adverse weather conditions on our operations;
|
|
|
|
Our dependence on fixed price contracts and the potential to
incur losses with respect to those contracts;
|
|
|
|
Estimates relating to our use of
percentage-of-completion
accounting;
|
|
|
|
Our ability to generate internal growth;
|
|
|
|
The effect of natural gas and oil prices on our operations and
growth opportunities;
|
|
|
|
Our ability to effectively compete for new projects and obtain
contract awards for projects bid;
|
|
|
|
Our ability to successfully negotiate, execute, perform and
complete pending and existing contracts;
|
|
|
|
Cancellation provisions within our contracts and the risk that
contracts expire and are not renewed or are replaced on less
favorable terms;
|
|
|
|
Liabilities for claims that are not insured;
|
|
|
|
Unexpected costs or liabilities that may arise from lawsuits or
indemnity claims related to the services we perform;
|
|
|
|
Risks relating to the potential unavailability or cancellation
of third party insurance;
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
The failure to effectively integrate Price Gregory and Valard
and their operations or to realize potential synergies, such as
cross-selling opportunities, from the acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
Our ability to attract skilled labor and retain key personnel
and qualified employees;
|
|
|
|
The potential shortage of skilled employees;
|
|
|
|
Our ability to realize our backlog;
|
|
|
|
Estimates and assumptions in determining our financial results
and backlog;
|
|
|
|
Our ability to successfully identify, complete and integrate
other acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
The potential adverse impact resulting from uncertainty
surrounding acquisitions, including the ability to retain key
personnel from the acquired businesses and the potential
increase in risks already existing in our operations such as
those relating to our unionized workforce and occupational
health and safety matters;
|
|
|
|
Potential failure of renewable energy initiatives, the ARRA or
other existing or potential energy legislation to result in
increased spending in the industries we serve;
|
|
|
|
The adverse impact of goodwill, other intangible asset or
long-lived asset impairments;
|
|
|
|
The potential inability to realize a return on our capital
investments in our fiber optic infrastructure;
|
|
|
|
The inability of our customers to pay for services following a
bankruptcy or other financial difficulty;
|
|
|
|
Beliefs and assumptions about the collectability of receivables;
|
|
|
|
The impact of our unionized workforce on our operations and on
our ability to complete future acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
Liabilities associated with union pension plans, including
underfunding liabilities;
|
|
|
|
Potential liabilities relating to occupational health and safety
matters;
|
|
|
|
Risks associated with expanding our business in international
markets, including losses that may arise from currency
fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
and/or harm
to our reputation resulting from failures of our joint venture
partners to perform;
|
|
|
|
Risks related to the implementation of an information technology
solution;
|
|
|
|
Potential lack of available suppliers, subcontractors or
equipment manufacturers;
|
|
|
|
Our growth outpacing our infrastructure;
|
|
|
|
Our ability to obtain performance bonds;
|
|
|
|
Requirements relating to governmental regulation and changes
thereto, including state and federal telecommunication
regulations affecting our fiber optic licensing business,
additional regulation relating to existing or potential foreign
operations and changes to legislation under the presidential
administration, including those related to occupational health
and safety, health care and financial reform;
|
|
|
|
Potential exposure to environmental liabilities;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increased costs resulting from new legislation, including the
recently enacted healthcare reform legislation;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our ability to continue to meet the requirements of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002;
|
|
|
|
Inability to enforce our intellectual property rights or the
obsolescence of such rights;
|
|
|
|
Potential losses associated with hedged transactions;
|
|
|
|
The cost of borrowing, availability of credit, debt covenant
compliance, interest rate fluctuations and other factors
affecting our financing, leasing and investment activities and
thereby our ability to grow our operations;
|
|
|
|
Rapid technological and structural changes that could reduce the
demand for the services we provide; and
|
|
|
|
The other risks and uncertainties as are described elsewhere
herein and under Item 1A Risk Factors in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 and as may be detailed
from time to time in our other public filings with the SEC.
|
50
All of our forward-looking statements, whether written or oral,
are expressly qualified by these cautionary statements and any
other cautionary statements that may accompany such
forward-looking statements or that are otherwise included in
this report. In addition, we do not undertake and expressly
disclaim any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking
statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of
this report or otherwise.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
|
The information in this section should be read in connection
with the information on financial market risk related to changes
in interest rates and currency exchange rates in Part II,
Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk, in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009. Our primary exposure
to market risk relates to unfavorable changes in concentration
of credit risk, interest rates and currency exchange rates.
Credit Risk. We are subject to concentrations
of credit risk related primarily to our cash and cash
equivalents and our accounts receivable including amounts
related to unbilled accounts receivable and costs and estimated
earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts.
Substantially all of our cash investments are managed by what we
believe to be high credit quality financial institutions. In
accordance with our investment policies, these institutions are
authorized to invest this cash in a diversified portfolio of
what we believe to be high-quality investments, which primarily
include interest-bearing demand deposits, money market mutual
funds and investment grade commercial paper with original
maturities of three months or less. Although we do not currently
believe the principal amounts of these investments are subject
to any material risk of loss, the weakness in the economy has
significantly impacted the interest income we receive from these
investments and is likely to continue to do so in the future. In
addition, as we grant credit under normal payment terms,
generally without collateral, we are subject to potential credit
risk related to our customers ability to pay for services
provided. This risk may be heightened as a result of ongoing
depressed economic and financial market conditions. However, we
believe the concentration of credit risk related to trade
accounts receivable and costs and estimated earnings in excess
of billings on uncompleted contracts is limited because of the
diversity of our customers. We perform ongoing credit risk
assessments of our customers and financial institutions and
obtain collateral or other security from our customers when
appropriate.
Interest Rate and Market Risk. Currently, we
do not have any significant assets or obligations with exposure
to significant interest rate and market risk.
Currency Risk. In the third quarter of 2009,
one of our Canadian operating units entered into three forward
contracts with settlement dates in December 2009, June 2010 and
November 2010, to reduce foreign currency risk associated with
anticipated customer sales that are denominated in South African
rand. This same operating unit also entered into three
additional forward contracts to reduce the foreign currency
exposure associated with a series of forecasted intercompany
payments denominated in U.S. dollars to be made over a
twelve-month period, which also had settlement dates in December
2009, June 2010 and November 2010.
The South African rand to Canadian dollar forward contracts had
an aggregate notional amount of approximately $11.0 million
($CAD) at origination, with contracts for approximately
$5.8 million ($CAD) and $3.2 million ($CAD) being
settled in December 2009 and June 2010. These contracts have
been accounted for by the Canadian operating unit as cash flow
hedges. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of the forward
contracts between the South African rand and the Canadian dollar
are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) prior to their
settlement and have been and will be reclassified into earnings
in the periods in which the hedged transactions occur. During
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, gains
of $0.1 million and $0.2 million were recorded to
other comprehensive income related to the remaining South
African rand to Canadian dollar forward contract. Additionally,
during the second quarter of 2010, approximately
$0.1 million of loss was reclassified into current period
earnings in connection with the contract settled in June 2010.
The Canadian dollar to U.S. dollar forward contracts had an
aggregate notional amount of approximately $9.5 million
(U.S.) at origination, with contracts for approximately
$5.0 million and $2.7 million having settled in
December 2009 and June 2010. Such contracts have also been
accounted for as cash flow hedges. Accordingly, changes in the
fair value of the forward contracts between the Canadian dollar
and the U.S. dollar are recorded in other comprehensive
income (loss) prior to their settlement and have been or will be
reclassified into earnings in the periods in which the hedged
transactions occur. During the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010, a loss
51
of $0.1 million and a gain of $0.3 million were
recorded to other comprehensive income related to the remaining
Canadian dollar to U.S. dollar forward contract.
Additionally, during the second quarter of 2010, approximately
$0.3 million of loss was reclassified into current period
earnings in connection with the contract settled in June 2010.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures.
|
Attached as exhibits to this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
are certifications of Quantas Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer that are required in accordance with
Rule 13a-14
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act). This Controls and Procedures section includes
information concerning the controls and controls evaluation
referred to in the certifications, and it should be read in
conjunction with the certifications for a more complete
understanding of the topics presented.
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management has established and maintains a system of
disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide
reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed
by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange
Act, such as this quarterly report, is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
SEC rules and forms. The disclosure controls and procedures are
also designed to provide reasonable assurance that such
information is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, we
evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to
Rule 13a-15(b)
of the Exchange Act. This evaluation was carried out under the
supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer. Based on this evaluation, these officers have concluded
that, as of September 30, 2010, our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance of
achieving their objectives.
Internal
Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the quarter ended
September 30, 2010, that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
Design
and Operation of Control Systems
Our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls
and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting
will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control
system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide
only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control
systems objectives will be met. The design of a control
system must reflect the fact that there are resource
constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered
relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent
limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls
can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error
or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances
of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These
inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in
decision-making can be faulty and breakdowns can occur because
of simple errors or mistakes. Controls can be circumvented by
the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more
people, or by management override of the controls. The design of
any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions
about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no
assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated
goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or
deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or
procedures.
52
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
QUANTA
SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings.
|
We are from time to time a party to various lawsuits, claims and
other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of
business. These actions typically seek, among other things,
compensation for alleged personal injury, breach of contract
and/or
property damages, punitive damages, civil penalties or other
losses, or injunctive or declaratory relief. With respect to all
such lawsuits, claims and proceedings, we record reserves when
it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount
of loss can be reasonably estimated. We do not believe that any
of these proceedings, separately or in the aggregate, would be
expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
Except as provided below, as of the date of this filing, there
have been no material changes from the risk factors previously
disclosed in Item 1A to Part I of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 (2009 Annual Report).
An investment in our common stock involves various risks. When
considering an investment in our company, you should carefully
consider all of the risk factors described herein and in our
2009 Annual Report. These risks and uncertainties are not the
only ones facing us and there may be additional matters that are
not known to us or that we currently consider immaterial. All of
these risks and uncertainties could adversely affect our
business, financial condition or future results and, thus, the
value of an investment in our company.
We may
incur additional healthcare costs arising from federal
healthcare reform legislation.
In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010
were signed into law in the U.S. This legislation expands
health care coverage to many uninsured individuals and expands
coverage to those already insured. The changes required by this
legislation could cause us to incur additional healthcare and
other costs, but we do not expect any material short-term impact
on our financial results as a result of the legislation and are
currently assessing the extent of any long-term impact.
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
|
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table contains information about our purchases of
equity securities during the three months ended
September 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Maximum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Total Number
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares Purchased
|
|
that may yet be
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly
|
|
Purchased Under
|
|
|
(a) Total Number of
|
|
(b) Average Price
|
|
Announced Plans
|
|
the Plans or
|
Period
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
Paid Per Share
|
|
or Programs
|
|
Programs
|
|
August 1, 2010 August 31, 2010
|
|
|
5,195
|
(i)
|
|
$
|
17.95
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
(i) |
|
Represents shares purchased from employees to satisfy tax
withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of
restricted stock awards pursuant to Quantas 2007 Stock
Incentive Plan and InfraSources 2004 Omnibus Stock
Incentive Plan. |
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
No.
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Share Purchase Agreement dated as of October 22, 2010, by and
among Quanta Services, Inc., Quanta Services EC Canada Ltd.,
Quanta Services CC Canada Ltd., the shareholders of Valard
Construction (2008) Ltd., Valard Construction Ltd. and
Sharps Construction Services 2006 Ltd., and the
covenantors named therein (previously filed as Exhibit 2.1 to
the Companys Form 8-K (No. 001-13831) filed on October 28,
2010 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation (previously filed as
Exhibit 3.3 to the Companys
Form 10-Q
(No. 001-13831)
filed August 14, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws (previously filed as
Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys 2000
Form 10-K
(No. 001-13831)
filed April 2, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Designation of Series F Preferred Stock
(previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Form 8-K
(No. 001-13831) filed on October 28, 2010 and incorporated
herein by reference)
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Support Agreement dated as of October 25, 2010, by and among
Quanta Services, Inc., Quanta Services EC Canada Ltd., Quanta
Services CC Canada Ltd., and certain shareholders of Valard
Construction (2008) Ltd., Valard Construction Ltd. and
Sharps Construction Services 2006 Ltd. (previously filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Form 8-K (No.
001-13831) filed on October 28, 2010 and incorporated herein by
reference)
|
|
31
|
.1*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
and pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (filed herewith)
|
|
31
|
.2*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
and pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (filed herewith)
|
|
32
|
.1*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith)
|
|
101
|
.INS
|
|
|
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
101
|
.SCH
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
|
101
|
.CAL
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
101
|
.LAB
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
|
101
|
.PRE
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed or furnished herewith |
|
|
|
Filed or furnished with this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
included in Exhibit 101 to this report are the following
documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting
Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Operations
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009, (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and
(iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
Users of the XBRL data furnished herewith are advised pursuant
to Rule 406T of
Regulation S-T
that this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a
registration statement or prospectus for purposes of
sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed
not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability
under these sections. |
54
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant, Quanta Services, Inc., has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
Quanta Services, Inc.
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Derrick
A. Jensen
|
Derrick A. Jensen
Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
Dated: November 9, 2010
55
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
No.
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Share Purchase Agreement dated as of October 22, 2010, by and
among Quanta Services, Inc., Quanta Services EC Canada Ltd.,
Quanta Services CC Canada Ltd., the shareholders of Valard
Construction (2008) Ltd., Valard Construction Ltd. and
Sharps Construction Services 2006 Ltd., and the
covenantors named therein (previously filed as Exhibit 2.1 to
the Companys Form 8-K (No. 001-13831) filed on October 28,
2010 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation (previously filed as
Exhibit 3.3 to the Companys
Form 10-Q
(No. 001-13831)
filed August 14, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws (previously filed as
Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys 2000
Form 10-K
(No. 001-13831)
filed April 2, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Designation of Series F Preferred Stock
(previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Form 8-K
(No. 001-13831) filed on October 28, 2010 and incorporated
herein by reference)
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
Support Agreement dated as of October 25, 2010, by and among
Quanta Services, Inc., Quanta Services EC Canada Ltd., Quanta
Services CC Canada Ltd., and certain shareholders of Valard
Construction (2008) Ltd., Valard Construction Ltd. and
Sharps Construction Services 2006 Ltd. (previously filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Form 8-K (No. 001-13831)
filed on October 28, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
|
31
|
.1*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
and pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (filed herewith)
|
|
31
|
.2*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
and pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (filed herewith)
|
|
32
|
.1*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Periodic Report by Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith)
|
|
101
|
.INS
|
|
|
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
101
|
.SCH
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
|
101
|
.CAL
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
101
|
.LAB
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
|
101
|
.PRE
|
|
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed or furnished herewith |
|
|
|
Filed or furnished with this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
included in Exhibit 101 to this report are the following
documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting
Language): (i) the Consolidated Statements of Operations
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009, (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and
(iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
Users of the XBRL data furnished herewith are advised pursuant
to Rule 406T of
Regulation S-T
that this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a
registration statement or prospectus for purposes of
sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed
not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability
under these sections. |
56