Skechers U.S.A., Inc.
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(AMENDMENT NO.___)
Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
o Preliminary Proxy Statement
o Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þ Definitive Proxy Statement
o Definitive Additional Materials
o Soliciting Material Pursuant to sec. 240.14a-12
SKECHERS U.S.A., INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
|
|
|
|
|
þ |
|
Fee not required. |
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the
filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SKECHERS
U.S.A., INC.
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF
STOCKHOLDERS
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy
Materials for the Stockholder
Meeting to Be Held on May 30, 2008
Dear Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders (the Annual Meeting) of Skechers
U.S.A., Inc., a Delaware corporation, to be held at the Shade
Hotel located at 1221 North Valley Drive, Manhattan Beach,
California 90266 on May 30, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. Pacific
Time.
Our Annual Meeting is being held to elect two members to the
Board of Directors to serve for a three-year term as
Class III Directors and to transact such other business as
may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments thereof.
The Board of Directors has set the close of business on
March 31, 2008 as the record date for determining those
stockholders who will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
The following proxy statement and enclosed proxy card are being
sent to each stockholder as of the record date, and our 2007
annual report is enclosed with this notice to our stockholders.
The proxy statement and 2007 annual report are available in
the SEC filings section of the investor relations page of our
corporate information website at
http://www.skx.com/investor.html.
You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting, and if
you plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person, you may find
directions by going to the annual meeting of stockholders
section of the investor relations page of our corporate
information website at www.skx.com/investor.html. If you
do not expect to attend, or if you plan to attend but desire the
proxy holders to vote your shares, please date and sign your
proxy card and return it in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.
The giving of this proxy card will not affect your right to vote
in person in the event you find it convenient to attend. Please
return the proxy card promptly to avoid the expense of
additional proxy solicitation.
FOR THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Philip G. Paccione,
Corporate Secretary
Dated: April 30, 2008
Manhattan Beach, California
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SKECHERS
U.S.A., INC.
For
Annual Meeting to be Held
May 30, 2008 at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time
This proxy statement is delivered to you by Skechers U.S.A.,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (we, us,
our, our company or
Skechers), in connection with our Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be held on May 30, 2008 at 10:00 a.m.
Pacific Time at the Shade Hotel located at 1221 North Valley
Drive, Manhattan Beach, California 90266 (the Annual
Meeting). The approximate mailing date for this proxy
statement and the enclosed proxy is April 30, 2008. If a
proxy in the accompanying form is duly executed and returned,
the shares represented by the proxy will be voted as directed.
If no direction is given, the shares represented by the proxy
will be voted for the election of the nominees for director
named herein. Any proxy given may be revoked at any time prior
to its exercise by notifying our Corporate Secretary, Philip
Paccione, in writing of such revocation, by duly executing and
delivering another proxy bearing a later date, or by attending
and voting in person at the Annual Meeting. Our principal
executive office is located at 228 Manhattan Beach Boulevard,
Manhattan Beach, California 90266.
We will incur the cost of this solicitation of proxies that will
be made by mail. In addition, our officers and other regularly
engaged employees may, in a limited number of instances, solicit
proxies personally or by telephone. We will reimburse banks,
brokerage firms, other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for
reasonable expenses incurred in sending proxy materials to
beneficial owners of our Class A Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock.
Holders of our Class A Common Stock and Class B Common
Stock of record at the close of business on March 31, 2008
will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. There were
33,287,596 shares of Class A Common Stock and
12,851,789 shares of Class B Common Stock outstanding
on that date. Each share of Class A Common Stock is
entitled to one vote and each share of Class B Common Stock
is entitled to ten votes, and the presence in person or by proxy
of holders of a majority of the combined voting interest of the
outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock and Class B
Common Stock is necessary to constitute a quorum for the Annual
Meeting. A quorum must be established to consider any matter.
The two candidates for director receiving the most votes will
become directors of Skechers. Stockholders may not cumulate
their votes. Any other proposals require the affirmative
for vote of a majority of the shares present in
person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on those
proposals at the Annual Meeting. If you hold shares beneficially
in street name and do not provide your broker with voting
instructions, your shares may constitute broker
non-votes. Generally, broker non-votes occur on a matter
when a broker is not permitted to vote on that matter without
instructions from the beneficial owner and instructions are not
given. In tabulating the voting result for any particular
proposal, shares that constitute broker non-votes are not
considered entitled to vote on that proposal. Thus, broker
non-votes will not affect the outcome of any matter being voted
on at the meeting, assuming that a quorum is obtained. However,
shares represented by such broker non-votes will be
counted in determining whether there is a quorum. A properly
executed proxy marked Abstain with respect to any
such matter will not be voted, although it will be counted for
purposes of determining whether there is a quorum. Because
directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast, proxies
marked Abstain as to Proposal No. 1 will
not have any effect on the election of directors as long as one
vote is cast for each director nominee.
PROPOSAL NO. 1
ELECTION
OF DIRECTORS
Our Board of Directors is divided into three classes, with each
class serving a three-year term until their successors are duly
elected and qualified or until their death, resignation or
removal. One class of directors is elected annually at our
annual meeting of stockholders. Our bylaws provide for a
variable Board of Directors with between five and nine members.
We currently have seven members on our Board of Directors. Our
bylaws give the Board of Directors the authority to increase or
decrease the number of directors without the approval of our
stockholders, and our bylaws also give our stockholders the
authority to increase or decrease the size of our Board of
Directors.
Unless otherwise directed by stockholders, within the limits set
forth in our bylaws, the proxy holders will vote all shares
represented by proxies held by them for the election of Geyer
Kosinski and Richard Siskind, who are director nominees and are
currently members of the Board of Directors. We have been
advised by Geyer Kosinski and Richard Siskind of their
availability and willingness to serve if re-elected. In the
event that Geyer Kosinski and/or Richard Siskind becomes
unavailable or unable to serve as a member of the Board of
Directors prior to the voting, the proxy holders will refrain
from voting for them or will vote for a substitute nominee in
the exercise of their best judgment.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR these
director-nominees.
2
BOARD OF
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Information
Concerning Director Nominees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class and Year in Which
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
|
Term Will Expire
|
|
|
Position
|
|
|
Geyer
Kosinski(1)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
Class III (2011
|
)
|
|
|
Director
|
|
Richard
Siskind(1)(2)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
Class III (2011
|
)
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Member of the Audit Committee
|
|
(2)
|
|
Member of the Compensation Committee
|
Geyer Kosinski has served as a member of our Board of
Directors since November 2001. Since July 2004,
Mr. Kosinski has been the Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Media Talent Group, a talent management and
production company that produces feature films and television
programming and manages over 50 actors, writers and directors.
From April 1997 to June 2004, Mr. Kosinski was a Managing
Partner and co-owner of Industry Entertainment, a talent
management and production company that produces feature films
and television programming and manages over 100 actors, writers
and directors.
Richard Siskind has served as a member of our Board of
Directors since June 1999. In 1991, Mr. Siskind founded R.
Siskind & Company, a business that purchases brand
name mens and womens apparel and accessories and
redistributes those items to off-price retailers, and he is its
sole shareholder, Chief Executive Officer, President and sole
member of its Board of Directors. From November 2002 to June
2006, Mr. Siskind served as a member of the Board of
Directors of Magic Lantern Group, Inc. (AMEX:GML), which changed
its name from JKC Group, Inc.
Directors
Not Standing for Election
The members of the Board of Directors who are continuing and not
standing for election at this years Annual Meeting are set
forth below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class and Year in Which
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Term Will Expire
|
|
Position
|
|
Robert Greenberg
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
Class I (2009)
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|
Morton D.
Erlich(1)(2)
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
Class I (2009)
|
|
|
Director
|
Michael Greenberg
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
Class II (2010)
|
|
|
President and Director
|
David Weinberg
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
Class II (2010)
|
|
|
Executive Vice President; Chief Operating Officer and Director
|
Jeffrey Greenberg
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
Class II (2010)
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Active Electronic Media and Director
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Member of the Audit Committee
|
|
(2)
|
|
Member of the Compensation Committee
|
Robert Greenberg has served as our Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer since October 1993.
Morton D. Erlich has served as a member of our Board of
Directors since January 2006 and provided consulting services to
various private enterprises since September 2004.
Mr. Erlich worked for 34 years at KPMG LLP including
24 years as an audit partner until retiring in September
2004.
Michael Greenberg has served as our President and a
member of our Board of Directors since our companys
inception in 1992, and from June 1992 to October 1993, he served
as our Chairman of the Board.
David Weinberg has served as our Chief Operating Officer
since January 2006 and as Executive Vice President and a member
of our Board of Directors since July 1998, and from October 1993
to January 2006, he also served as our Chief Financial Officer.
3
Jeffrey Greenberg has served as our Senior Vice
President, Active Electronic Media since June 2005 and as a
member of our Board of Directors since September 2000. From
January 1998 to June 2005, Mr. Greenberg served as our Vice
President, Active Electronic Media. Previously,
Mr. Greenberg served as our Chief Operating Officer,
Secretary and a member of our Board of Directors from June 1992
to July 1998, and as our Chief Executive Officer from June 1992
to October 1993.
Executive
Officers
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to our executive officers who are not also members of our Board
of Directors. For information concerning Robert Greenberg,
Michael Greenberg and David Weinberg, see Directors Not
Standing for Election above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Frederick Schneider
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
Philip Paccione
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
General Counsel; Executive Vice President, Business Affairs; and
Corporate Secretary
|
Mark Nason
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Product Development
|
Frederick Schneider has served as our Chief Financial
Officer since January 2006. From February 2004 to when he joined
our company in January 2006, Mr. Schneider served on our
Board of Directors and as Chairman of our Audit Committee. He
also currently serves on the Board of Directors and as Chairman
of the Audit Committee at each of Meade Instruments
(NASDAQ:MEAD) and Sport Chalet, Inc. (NASDAQ:SPCH).
Mr. Schneider has served as a Board member and Audit
Committee member at Meade Instruments since August 2004 and at
Sport Chalet since May 2002. From July 2004 to December 2005, he
served as a senior managing director at Pasadena Capital
Partners, a private equity investment firm. Prior to working at
Pasadena Capital Partners, Mr. Schneider was an independent
private equity investor and consultant; from September 1994 to
January 1998, he served as chief financial officer and principal
of Leonard Green & Partners, L.P., a merchant banking
firm specializing in leveraged buyouts; and from June 1978 to
September 1994, he worked at KPMG LLP including five years as an
audit and due diligence partner.
Philip Paccione has served as our Executive Vice
President, Business Affairs since February 2000, as our
Corporate Secretary since July 1998 and as our General Counsel
since May 1998.
Mark Nason has served as our Executive Vice President,
Product Development since March 2002. From January 1998 to March
2002, Mr. Nason served as our Vice President, Retail and
Merchandising, and from December 1993 to January 1998, he served
as our Director of Merchandising and Retail Development.
Robert Greenberg is the father of Michael Greenberg and Jeffrey
Greenberg; other than the foregoing, no family relationships
exist between any of our executive officers or directors.
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS
Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics
Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all
directors, officers and employees, was adopted by the Board of
Directors as of April 28, 2004 and amended by the Board as
of January 15, 2007. The purpose of the Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics is to promote honest and ethical conduct. The
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is posted in the corporate
governance section of the investor relations page of our
corporate information website located at www.skx.com, and is
available in print, without charge, upon written request to our
Corporate Secretary at Skechers U.S.A., Inc., 228 Manhattan
Beach Boulevard, Manhattan Beach, California 90266. We intend to
promptly post any amendments to or waivers of the Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics on our website.
Controlled
Company Exemption under NYSE Rules
Under Section 303A of the New York Stock Exchange
(NYSE) Listed Company Manual (collectively, the
NYSE Rules), we are considered a Controlled
Company because Robert Greenberg beneficially owns 62.0%
of
4
the voting power in our company (see Transactions with
Related Persons). As a Controlled Company, we are
exempt from certain NYSE Rules requiring a board of directors
with a majority of independent members, a compensation committee
composed entirely of independent directors and a nominating
committee composed entirely of independent directors. However,
notwithstanding this exemption, as described more fully below,
we established a Compensation Committee in 2006 that is composed
entirely of independent directors in accordance with
Section 303A.05 of the NYSE Rules.
Director
Independence
Our Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that the
Board has three members who are independent
consistent with Section 303A.02 of the NYSE Rules. These
directors are currently Morton D. Erlich, who is Chairman of our
Audit Committee and a member of our Compensation Committee,
Geyer Kosinski, who is a member of our Audit Committee, and
Richard Siskind, who is Chairman of our Compensation Committee
and a member of our Audit Committee. The Board of Directors made
this affirmative determination regarding these directors
independence based on discussions with the directors and on its
review of the directors responses to a questionnaire
regarding employment and compensation history; affiliations,
family and other relationships; and transactions with our
company, its subsidiaries and affiliates. The Board considered
relationships and transactions between each director or any
member of his immediate family and our company and its
subsidiaries and affiliates, including those reported in the
section entitled Transactions with Related
Persons in this proxy statement. The purpose of the
Boards review with respect to each director was to
determine whether any such relationships or transactions were
inconsistent with a determination that the director is
independent under the NYSE Rules.
Attendance
of Directors at Board Meetings and Annual Meeting of
Stockholders
Our Board of Directors met four times in 2007, and each of the
directors attended all of the meetings, except Geyer Kosinski
who was unable to attend one meeting. While we do not have a
policy requiring our directors to attend our Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, all but one of the directors attended the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders held in 2007.
Audit
Committee
Our Audit Committee, which was established in accordance with
Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the Exchange Act), is responsible for
overseeing (i) the quality and integrity of our financial
statements, (ii) the appointment, compensation,
independence and performance of the independent registered
public accounting firm, (iii) our compliance with legal and
regulatory requirements and (iv) the performance of
internal audit and controls function.
The Audit Committee is currently composed of Chairman Morton D.
Erlich, Geyer Kosinski and Richard Siskind, each of whom is
independent under Sections 303A.02 of the NYSE
Rules and Section 10A(m)(3) of, and
Rule 10A-3(b)
under, the Exchange Act. The Audit Committee held seven meetings
in 2007, each of which was attended by all of its members.
Our Audit Committee currently acts under a written Audit
Committee Charter adopted by the Board of Directors as of
April 29, 2004 and amended by the Board as of
January 15, 2007 and December 18, 2007. The Audit
Committee Charter, which complies with the NYSE Rules and is
subject to amendment from time to time by the Board of
Directors, is attached as Appendix A to this proxy
statement. The Audit Committee Charter is also posted in the
corporate governance section of the investor relations page of
our corporate information website located at www.skx.com,
and copies are available in print, without charge, upon written
request to our Corporate Secretary at Skechers U.S.A., Inc., 228
Manhattan Beach Boulevard, Manhattan Beach, California 90266.
Audit
Committee Financial Expert
Our Board of Directors has determined that Morton D. Erlich, who
currently serves as Chairman of our Audit Committee, is an
audit committee financial expert as that term is
defined in Item 407(d)(5) of
Regulation S-K.
5
Compensation
Committee
Our Compensation Committee is responsible for
(i) discharging the Boards responsibilities relating
to compensation of our executive officers, (ii) overseeing
the administration of our executive compensation plans,
(iii) reviewing and discussing with our management the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by the applicable
rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC) and recommending to the Board whether such
disclosure should be included in our proxy statement and
(iv) producing an annual report on executive compensation
for inclusion in our proxy statement in accordance with the
applicable rules of the SEC. This includes reviewing and
approving the annual compensation of our Chief Executive Officer
and other executive officers, reviewing and making
recommendations to the Board with respect to executive
compensation plans, including incentive compensation and
equity-based compensation, and reviewing and approving
performance goals and objectives with respect to the
compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive
officers consistent with our executive compensation plans.
The Compensation Committee is composed of Chairman Richard
Siskind and Morton D. Erlich. The Compensation Committee held
seven meetings in 2007, each of which was attended by both of
its members.
Our Compensation Committee currently acts under a written
Compensation Committee Charter adopted by the Board of Directors
as of March 31, 2006 and amended by the Board as of
December 12, 2006. The Compensation Committee Charter,
which complies with the NYSE Rules and is subject to amendment
from time to time by the Board of Directors, is posted in the
corporate governance section of the investor relations page of
our corporate information website located at www.skx.com.
Copies are available in print, without charge, upon written
request to our Corporate Secretary at Skechers U.S.A., Inc., 228
Manhattan Beach Boulevard, Manhattan Beach, California 90266.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Our Compensation Committee is composed of Richard Siskind and
Morton D. Erlich, neither of whom has ever been an employee or
officer of our company or any of its subsidiaries. None of our
executive officers has served or currently serves on the board
of directors or on the compensation committee of any other
entity, which has officers who served on our Board of Directors
or Compensation Committee during the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007.
Director
Nominations
As a Controlled Company under the NYSE Rules, we are not
required to and currently do not have a nominating committee.
Our Chairman of the Board, in consultation with other members of
management and directors, performs the functions of a nominating
committee, including the identification and evaluation of
director candidates. Nominees for directors are identified and
recommended by the Chairman of the Board and presented to the
full Board of Directors. Qualifications and skills that the
Board of Directors requires of directors are set forth in our
Corporate Governance Guidelines, which was adopted by the Board
as of April 28, 2004 and is posted in the corporate
governance section of the investor relations page of our
corporate information website located at www.skx.com. Copies are
available in print, without charge, upon written request to our
Corporate Secretary at Skechers U.S.A., Inc., 228 Manhattan
Beach Boulevard, Manhattan Beach, California 90266. Our Board of
Directors seeks members from diverse professional and personal
backgrounds who combine a broad spectrum of experience and
expertise with a reputation for integrity. Factors considered in
evaluating a director candidate include the evaluation of
diversity, age, skills and experience in the context of the
needs of the Board. Additionally, directors should not serve on
more than two boards of public companies in addition to our
Board of Directors. The Board believes that the functions of a
nominating committee are more than adequately performed by our
Chairman of the Board and the Board of Directors as a whole.
Pursuant to our bylaws, a stockholder may nominate a person for
election as a director at an annual meeting of stockholders only
if written notice of such stockholders intent to make such
nomination has been given to our Corporate Secretary no later
than the close of business on the 60th day nor earlier than the
close of business on the 90th day in advance of such meeting.
Each notice is required to set forth certain information,
including (i) the name and address of the stockholder and
of the person or persons to be nominated, (ii) a
description of all arrangements or
6
understandings between the stockholder and each nominee pursuant
to which the nomination is to be made, (iii) information
regarding each nominee as would be required to be included in a
proxy statement filed pursuant to the proxy rules of the SEC had
the nominee been nominated, or intended to be nominated, by the
Board and (iv) the consent of each nominee to serve as a
director if so elected. The stockholder must also promptly
provide any other information that we reasonably request.
Executive
Sessions
Non-management directors meet regularly in executive sessions
without our management. Non-management directors are those
directors who are not also our executive officers and include
directors, if any, who are not independent by virtue of the
existence of a material relationship with our company. Executive
sessions are led by a Presiding Independent Director. An
executive session is typically held in conjunction with each
regularly scheduled Audit Committee meeting and other sessions
may be called by the Presiding Independent Director in his own
discretion or at the request of the Board of Directors. Morton
D. Erlich is currently designated as the Presiding Independent
Director.
COMPENSATION
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The following discussion and analysis of compensation
arrangements of our Named Executive Officers for 2007 should be
read together with the compensation tables and related
disclosures set forth below. The Named Executive Officers are
those executive officers listed in the table captioned
Summary Compensation Table in this proxy statement:
Robert Greenberg, Chief Executive Officer; Michael Greenberg,
President; David Weinberg, Chief Operating Officer; Frederick
Schneider, Chief Financial Officer; and Mark Nason, Executive
Vice President of Product Development. This discussion contains
forward looking statements that are based on our current plans,
considerations, expectations and determinations regarding future
compensation programs. Actual compensation programs that we
adopt may differ materially from currently planned programs as
summarized in this discussion.
Role of
Compensation Committee
Our executive compensation program is administered by or under
the direction of the Compensation Committee of our Board of
Directors. Under the terms of its Charter, the Compensation
Committee is responsible for (i) discharging the
Boards responsibilities relating to compensation of our
executive officers, (ii) overseeing the administration of
our executive compensation plans, (iii) reviewing and
discussing with Skechers management this Compensation
Discussion and Analysis required by the applicable SEC rules and
recommending to the Board its inclusion in this proxy statement
and (iv) producing the annual report on executive
compensation included elsewhere in this proxy statement in
accordance with the applicable SEC rules.
The Compensation Committee has the authority to retain the
services of outside advisors, experts and other consultants to
assist in the evaluation of the compensation of the Chief
Executive Officer, the other executive officers and the Board of
Directors. Neither we nor our Compensation Committee retained a
compensation consultant in 2007 to review policies and
procedures with respect to executive compensation or to advise
us on compensation matters. For 2007, the Compensation Committee
reviewed managements compensation recommendations and then
discussed these recommendations with management. The final
recommendation by the Compensation Committee was approved by the
Board of Directors.
Role of
Management in Compensation Decisions
Management, led by our Chief Executive Officer, President and
Chief Operating Officer, annually makes recommendations to the
Compensation Committee regarding (i) annual base salary and
bonuses to be paid to executive officers, (ii) the
formation and modification of our equity-based and incentive
compensation plans for executive officers, (iii) awards to
be granted under our equity-based compensation plan and
(iv) performance metrics to be used to calculate incentive
compensation that executive officers may earn under our
incentive compensation plan. Management also meets periodically
with the Compensation Committee to discuss these
recommendations, which are based on managements assessment
of the base salary, equity-based compensation and incentive
compensation opportunities that are competitive within our
industry and within the geographical labor
7
markets in which we participate. The Compensation Committee has
the authority to adopt, modify or reject any of these
recommendations.
Compensation
Objectives
The basic compensation philosophy of our management and the
Compensation Committee is to provide competitive salaries and
incentives to executive officers in order to promote superior
financial performance. The Compensation Committee believes that
compensation paid to executive officers should be closely
aligned with our performance on both a short-term and long-term
basis, linked to specific, measurable results intended to create
value for stockholders, and that such compensation should assist
us in attracting and retaining key executives critical to our
long-term success.
Our executive compensation policies are designed to achieve four
primary objectives:
|
|
|
|
|
attract and motivate well-qualified individuals with the ability
and talent for us to achieve our business objectives and
corporate strategies;
|
|
|
|
provide incentives to achieve specific short-term individual and
corporate goals by rewarding achievement of those goals at
established financial performance levels;
|
|
|
|
provide incentives to achieve longer-term financial goals and
reinforce sense of ownership through award opportunities that
can result in ownership of stock; and
|
|
|
|
promote retention of key executives and align the interests of
management with those of the stockholders to reinforce
achievement of continuing increases in stockholder value.
|
Consistent with our performance-based philosophy, the
Compensation Committee reviews and approves our compensation
programs to effectively balance executive officers
salaries with incentive compensation that is performance-based
as well as to reward annual performance while maintaining a
focus on longer-term objectives. We believe that it serves the
needs of our stockholders and key executives to provide
incentives commensurate with individual management
responsibilities and past and future contributions to corporate
objectives. The mix of compensation elements varies based on an
executive officers position and responsibilities with
Skechers.
To maximize stockholder value, we believe that it is necessary
to deliver consistent, long-term sales and earnings growth.
Accordingly, the Compensation Committee reviews not only the
individual compensation elements, but the mix of individual
compensation elements that make up the aggregate compensation
and attempts to balance the total compensation package between
short-term, long-term and currently paid cash and equity
compensation in a way that meets the objectives set forth above.
Elements
of Compensation
Our executive compensation consists of three primary components:
|
|
|
|
|
base salary and benefits;
|
|
|
|
performance-based compensation, if any, under the 2006 Annual
Incentive Compensation Plan (the 2006 Plan); and
|
|
|
|
equity compensation awarded under the 2007 Incentive Award Plan
(the 2007 Plan), including restricted stock and
stock options.
|
These components, individually and in the aggregate, are
designed to accomplish one or more of the four compensation
objectives described above.
Base
Salary
Base salaries for our Named Executive Officers are established
based on the scope of their respective responsibilities, taking
into account market compensation paid by competitors within our
industry and other companies of similar type, size and financial
performance for individuals in similar positions. We set base
compensation for our Named Executive Officers at levels that we
believe enable us to hire and retain individuals in a
8
competitive environment, and to reward satisfactory performance
at an acceptable level based upon contributions to our overall
business objectives.
Base salaries are generally reviewed annually, but may be
adjusted from time to time to realign salaries with market
levels. In reviewing base salaries, we consider various factors,
including (i) each individuals level of
responsibilities, performance and results achieved, and
professional experience, (ii) a comparison to base salaries
paid to employees in comparable positions by our competitors and
companies of similar type, size and financial performance and
(iii) cost of living increases. The base salaries of
Messrs. Weinberg and Nason increased for 2007 over the
previous years levels as a result of a combination of
factors, including continued positive financial performance by
Skechers, improved individual performances and increased
responsibilities. While the base salaries of Robert Greenberg
and Michael Greenberg remained unchanged
year-over-year,
the same factors could be attributed to increases in their total
compensation over 2006. This was consistent with our
performance-based philosophy, as our Named Executive
Officers total compensation for 2007 was generally more
heavily weighted towards incentive compensation as compared to
the previous year. This same philosophy was applied when
determining Mr. Schneiders base salary (and formulae
for annual incentive compensation) for 2007, and while his base
salary remained unchanged
year-over-year
too, his total compensation for 2007 did not increase largely
due to the decrease in the fair value of stock awards and option
awards that were granted prior to 2007.
Annual
Incentive Compensation
The 2006 Plan is intended to advance our interests and those of
our stockholders and to assist us in attracting and retaining
executive officers by providing incentives and financial rewards
to such executives who, because of the extent of their
responsibilities can make significant contributions to our
success through their ability, industry expertise, loyalty and
exceptional services.
The 2006 Plan continues the annual bonus policy that we have
used for many years and provides executive employees including
the Named Executive Officers with the opportunity to earn
bonuses based on our financial performance by linking incentive
award opportunities to the achievement of our performance goals.
The 2006 Plan allows us to set annual performance criteria and
goals that are flexible and change with the needs of our
business. The Compensation Committee annually approves the
performance criteria and goals that will be used in formulae to
calculate our Named Executive Officers incentive
compensation for each fiscal year. By determining performance
criteria and setting goals at the beginning of each fiscal year,
our Named Executive Officers understand our goals and priorities
during the current fiscal year. Our performance goals are set by
reference to one or more of the business criteria that are
listed under Executive Compensation2006 Annual
Incentive Compensation Plan. The business criteria
used in the formulae to calculate the incentive compensation of
our Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating
Officer for 2007 were our net sales and net earnings because the
Compensation Committee believes that they provide an accurate
and comprehensive measure of our annual performance. For our
other Named Executive Officers, our net sales were used to
calculate their incentive compensation for 2007.
The potential payments of incentive compensation to our Named
Executive Officers are performance-driven and therefore
completely at risk. The payment of any incentive compensation
for a fiscal year under the 2006 Plan is conditioned on the
Company achieving at least certain threshold performance levels
of the business criteria approved by the Compensation Committee,
and no payments will be made to the Companys Named
Executive Officers if the threshold performance levels are not
met. Any incentive compensation to be paid to the Named
Executive Officers in excess of the threshold amounts is based
on the Compensation Committees pre-approved business
criteria and formulae for the respective Named Executive
Officers. The threshold performance levels for 2007 were
attainable based on our recent historical financial
performance, and additional incentive compensation could have
been earned based on our financial performance exceeding
increasingly challenging levels of performance goals, none of
which was certain to be achieved. The Compensation Committee did
not place a maximum limit on the incentive compensation that
could have been earned by the Named Executive Officers in 2007,
although the maximum amount of incentive compensation that any
Named Executive Officer may earn in a
12-month
period under the 2006 Plan is $5,000,000.
The Named Executive Officers were generally targeted to receive
from 20% to 70% of their annual salaries for 2007 in annual
bonus compensation, which was determined to be competitive in
the marketplace for similar
9
positions. In determining the potential awards that computed
into these percentages, the Compensation Committee considered
each Named Executive Officers position, responsibilities
and prospective contribution to the attainment of our
performance goals. The percentage of total compensation
represented by incentive awards is generally higher for more
senior executives to reflect their greater influence on profits
and sales and to put a larger percentage of their total
potential cash compensation at risk. Accordingly,
our Chief Executive Officer, Robert Greenberg, was at the top
end of the range.
Based on our financial performance and the performance goals
previously set by the Compensation Committee for each Named
Executive Officer for 2007, the actual incentive compensation
earned by each Named Executive Officer for 2007 was $1,706,330
for Robert Greenberg, which represented 62% of his total
compensation; $873,798 for Michael Greenberg, which represented
45% of his total compensation; $528,166 for David Weinberg,
which represented 33% of his total compensation, $382,532 for
Mark Nason, which represented 27% of his total compensation; and
$191,266 for Frederick Schneider, which represented 26% of his
total compensation.
Incentive compensation awarded under the 2006 Plan complements
the approach of our equity compensation program described below,
which is focused on our long-term achievements for earnings per
share and total stockholder return.
Equity-Based
Compensation
Awards of restricted stock, stock options and other forms of
equity-based compensation under the 2007 Plan are designed to:
|
|
|
|
|
closely align management and stockholder interests;
|
|
|
|
promote retention and reward executives and other key employees
for building stockholder value; and
|
|
|
|
encourage long-term investment in Skechers by participating
Named Executive Officers.
|
The Compensation Committee believes that stock ownership by
management has been demonstrated to be beneficial to all
stockholders and stock awards have been granted by Skechers to
executive officers and other employees prior to 2007 for the
foregoing reasons. However, under the 1998 Stock Option,
Deferred Stock and Restricted Stock Plan (the 1998 Stock
Plan), we did not issue any shares of restricted stock to
the Named Executive Officers as part of their annual
compensation in 2007, and we have not granted any stock options
to the Named Executive Officers as part of their annual
compensation since February 2004. The 1998 Stock Plan was
terminated and no additional awards under that plan were
permitted after December 31, 2007. As of January 1,
2008, our employees including the Named Executive Officers were
eligible to receive, from time to time, issuances of restricted
stock, grants of stock options and other equity-based
compensation under the 2007 Plan. Following a meeting of the
Compensation Committee in December 2007, certain executive
employees including all of the Named Executive Officers were
awarded shares of restricted stock in January 2008 under the
2007 Plan as a component of their total compensation for the
2008 fiscal year.
Restricted
Stock
Historically, awards of restricted stock made to our Named
Executive Officers are subject to certain restrictions that
generally lapse over a period of four years from the date of
award. This vesting schedule promotes retention and encourages
long-term investment in Skechers by those Named Executive
Officers who do not already hold shares of our Class A or
Class B Common Stock. This also provides a reasonable time
frame to align the Named Executive Officers compensation
with stockholder interests since any appreciation of our stock
price will benefit both management and stockholders. An
additional advantage of restricted stock is that, in comparison
to stock options, fewer shares are required to deliver the same
economic value. This may result in lower stockholder dilution
than granting stock options. While we did not issue any shares
of restricted stock to the Named Executive Officers as part of
their annual compensation in 2007, they were awarded restricted
shares in January 2008 as part of their total compensation for
the 2008 fiscal year in part due to these advantages.
10
Stock
Options
Historically, grants of stock options made to our Named
Executive Officers generally vest over a period of three years,
with 25% vesting on the date of grant and 25% vesting each
anniversary thereafter, with all such options exercisable on the
third anniversary of the date of grant. This vesting schedule
promotes retention while the nature of stock options provides
Named Executive Officers and other key employees with an
incentive to contribute to stockholder value in the long term.
Stock options are typically priced at the closing price of our
Class A Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the
date of grant. All stock options expire ten years from the date
of grant. This provides a reasonable time frame to align the
Named Executive Officers compensation with stockholder
interests since any appreciation of our stock price will benefit
both management and stockholders. While playing a lesser role in
our current equity-based compensation program, stock options are
still an appropriate and highly motivating vehicle for
delivering long-term incentives. Stock options provide a direct
link with stockholder interests as they have zero intrinsic
value unless our stock price increases above the grant date
price. Despite these advantages, when the Compensation Committee
met in December 2007 to re-evaluate whether to award
equity-based compensation, they decided to award shares of
restricted stock rather than grant stock options to the Named
Executive Officers in January 2008 as part of their total
compensation for the 2008 fiscal year.
Employment
Agreements, Severance Benefits and Change of Control
Provisions
We do not have any employment, severance or
change-of-control
agreements in effect with any of our Named Executive Officers.
As mentioned above in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis
under the heading Equity-Based Compensation,
as of December 31, 2007, we had granted certain stock
options and awarded shares of restricted stock that are subject
to accelerated vesting upon a change of control of Skechers.
Generally, with respect to stock options previously granted
under the 1998 Stock Plan that remain outstanding, 25% of the
options vested immediately on the date of grant and the
remaining options vest 25% per year on each anniversary of the
date of grant, with all such options exercisable on the third
anniversary of the date of grant. For all shares of restricted
stock awarded to date under the 1998 Stock Plan, 20% of the
shares vested immediately on the date of award and the remaining
shares vest 20% per year on each anniversary of the date of
award, with restrictions on all shares lapsing on the fourth
anniversary of the date of award. In the event of a change of
control, all stock options and awards of restricted stock will
vest in full.
A change of control is defined in the 1998 Stock
Plan and the agreements under the 1998 Stock Plan as
(i) the acquisition by certain persons of our securities
representing 50% or more of the combined voting power of our
outstanding securities; (ii) a change during any two-year
period in a majority of the Board of Directors unless each new
director was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the
directors then still in office who were directors at the
beginning of the period, or whose election or nomination was so
approved; approval by our stockholders of a merger or
consolidation (except with certain permitted entities); or
(iii) approval by our stockholders of a complete
liquidation of our company or the sale or disposition of all or
substantially all of our assets.
As of December 31, 2007, we had not granted any awards of
restricted shares of Class A Common Stock, grants of
options to purchase shares of Class A Common Stock or other
equity-based compensation under the 2007 Plan, although the
change of control terms of the 2007 Plan are substantially
similar to those of the 1998 Stock Plan.
The Compensation Committee believes that our change of control
policy is consistent with the objectives of providing the
highest possible return to stockholders by allowing the Named
Executive Officers to be able to effectively participate equally
with stockholders in evaluating alternatives in the event of a
change of control transaction, without compelling the Named
Executive Officer to remain employed under new ownership.
Equity
Award Practices
As described under the Equity Compensation section, equity-based
awards are a key component of our overall executive compensation
program. We do not backdate grants of awards nor do we
coordinate the grant of awards with the release of material
information to result in favorable pricing. Initial grants of
awards to executive officers and other new employees are based
on the timing of date of hire. Historically, all grants of stock
options have been
11
made at 100% of fair market valuethe closing price of our
Class A Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the
date of grantand grants have never been re-priced.
Perquisites
and Other Benefits
We provide our Named Executive Officers with perquisites and
other benefits, reflected in the All Other
Compensation column in the table captioned Summary
Compensation Table in this proxy statement, that we believe
are reasonable, competitive and consistent with our overall
executive compensation program. The costs of these benefits
constitute only a small percentage of each Named Executive
Officers total compensation and include the following:
Employee Healthcare Premiums. We, at our sole
cost, provide to each Named Executive Officer, his spouse and
his children such health, dental and vision insurance as we may
from time to time make available to our other employees.
Matching Contributions to 401(k) Plan
Accounts. Each Named Executive Officer
participating in our contributory retirement plan (the
401(k) Plan) may contribute up to 15% of his salary
to his account under the 401(k) Plan, up to the IRS statutory
limitation of $15,500 for 2007 or $20,500 for those over
50 years old. We may make a matching contribution equal to
a percentage of salary contributed by the Named Executive
Officer to his account by the end of the first quarter of the
following fiscal year, which vests 20% per year for five years
beginning on the first anniversary of the Named Executive
Officers hire date. The percentage of this matching
contribution is the same for all of our employees participating
in the 401(k) Plan for each calendar year.
Aircraft usage. We have an agreement with an
aircraft operator for use of its aircraft for business travel.
Each Named Executive Officer may also use the aircraft for
personal use. If we are not reimbursed for costs associated with
personal use of the aircraft, such costs are considered taxable
income to the Named Executive Officer. During 2007, there was no
personal use of the aircraft by any of the Named Executive
Officers for which we were not reimbursed in full.
Automobile usage. During 2007, automobiles
that we leased or purchased at our sole cost were used by Robert
Greenberg, Michael Greenberg and David Weinberg. We also paid on
their behalf the automobile insurance premiums related to their
use of these automobiles.
Health Club Dues. During 2007, we paid health
club membership fees for David Weinberg and Frederick Schneider.
Impact of
Regulatory Requirements
Tax
Deductibility of Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the Code and, collectively,
Section 162(m)), places a limit of $1,000,000
on the annual amount of compensation (other than compensation
that qualifies as qualified performance-based
compensation) that publicly held companies may deduct for
federal income tax purposes for certain executive officers.
The Compensation Committee believes that tax deductibility is an
important factor, but only one factor, to be considered in
evaluating a compensation program. Thus, while the 2006 Plan has
generally been designed and administered to maintain tax
deductibility and the 2007 Plan permits the Compensation
Committee to grant awards that constitute qualified
performance-based compensation, the Compensation Committee
believes competitive and other circumstances may require that
the interests of Skechers and its stockholders are best served
by providing compensation that is not fully tax deductible.
Accordingly, the Compensation Committee may continue to exercise
discretion to provide base salaries or other compensation that
may not be fully tax deductible by Skechers.
Other
Tax, Accounting and Regulatory Considerations
Many other Code provisions, SEC regulations and accounting rules
affect the delivery of executive compensation and are generally
taken into consideration as programs are developed. Our goal is
to create and maintain plans that are efficient and in full
compliance with these requirements.
12
REPORT OF
THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis (set forth above) with the
management of Skechers, and, based on such review and
discussion, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the
Board of Directors inclusion of the Compensation Discussion and
Analysis in this proxy statement and, through incorporation by
reference from this proxy statement, in Skechers Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Respectfully submitted,
Morton D. Erlich, Chairman
Geyer Kosinski
Richard Siskind
13
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth selected information concerning
the compensation earned by our Principal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and each of our three most highly
compensated executive officers who served in positions other
than Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
at the end of the last completed fiscal year (the Named
Executive Officers).
Summary
Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Salary($)
|
|
|
Awards
($)(1)
|
|
|
Awards
($)(2)
|
|
|
Compensation
($)(3)
|
|
|
Compensation ($)
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
|
Robert Greenberg
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,706,330
|
|
|
|
29,920
|
(4)
|
|
|
2,736,250
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,494,455
|
|
|
|
35,941
|
(4)
|
|
|
2,530,396
|
|
and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frederick Schneider
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
31,320
|
|
|
|
5,416
|
|
|
|
191,266
|
|
|
|
21,799
|
(5)
|
|
|
749,801
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
62,389
|
|
|
|
54,930
|
|
|
|
198,891
|
|
|
|
23,860
|
(5)
|
|
|
840,070
|
|
Michael Greenberg
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
873,798
|
|
|
|
48,055
|
(6)
|
|
|
1,921,853
|
|
President
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
696,673
|
|
|
|
40,993
|
(6)
|
|
|
1,737,666
|
|
David Weinberg
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,773
|
|
|
|
528,166
|
|
|
|
57,514
|
(7)
|
|
|
1,592,453
|
|
Executive Vice President
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
900,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,663
|
|
|
|
497,227
|
|
|
|
53,574
|
(7)
|
|
|
1,519,464
|
|
and Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Nason
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,546
|
|
|
|
382,532
|
|
|
|
14,465
|
(8)
|
|
|
1,410,543
|
|
Executive Vice President,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
846,154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,325
|
|
|
|
397,782
|
|
|
|
11,139
|
(8)
|
|
|
1,392,400
|
|
Product Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents the dollar amount
recognized for financial statement reporting purposes in
accordance with SFAS 123R for the fair value of restricted
stock that was awarded in 2006, as we did not grant any stock
awards prior to 2006 and we did not grant any stock awards to
Named Executive Officers in 2007. These stock awards are subject
to certain restrictions that lapse over a period of four years,
with 20% of the shares vesting on the date of award in 2006 and
20% vesting each anniversary thereafter, with all such shares
fully vested on the fourth anniversary of the award date. The
fair value is calculated using the closing price of our
Class A Common Stock on the grant date for the shares
awarded. Pursuant to SEC rules, the amount shown excludes the
impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based vesting
conditions. The reported amount reflects our companys
stock-based compensation expense for this award and does not
correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by
Mr. Schneider.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Represents the dollar amount
recognized for financial statement reporting purposes in
accordance with SFAS 123R for the fair value of all stock
options granted to the Named Executive Officers. We have not
granted stock options to Named Executive Officers since 2004.
Frederick Schneiders compensation relates to stock options
granted to him in 2004 when he was a non-employee director.
These stock options vested over a period of three years, with
25% vesting on the date of grant in 2004 and 25% vesting each
anniversary thereafter, with all such options exercisable on the
third anniversary of the grant date. The fair value was
estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model in
accordance with SFAS 123R. The fair value per option was
$5.49 based on assumptions of five years expected life, expected
volatility of 73%, a risk free rate of 3.23% and no expected
dividend yield. Pursuant to SEC rules, the amount shown excludes
the impact of estimated forfeitures related to service-based
vesting conditions. The reported amounts reflect our
companys stock-based compensation expense for these awards
and do not correspond to the actual value that will be
recognized by Messrs. Schneider, Weinberg and Nason.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Represents the cash awards that the
Named Executive Officers earned under our 2006 Annual Incentive
Compensation Plan. Incentive compensation is paid quarterly
based on performance levels that our company achieved in the
prior quarter. The amounts listed for 2007 exclude any bonuses
earned by the Named Executive Officers in 2006 that were paid in
2007 and include incentive compensation earned in the fourth
quarter of 2007 that was paid in February 2008. The amounts
listed for 2006 exclude any bonuses earned by the Named
Executive Officers in 2005 that were paid in 2006 and include
incentive compensation earned in the fourth quarter of 2006 that
was paid in March 2007. Additional information regarding the
2006 Annual Incentive Compensation Plan is described in the
section entitled Compensation Discussion and
Analysis in this proxy statement.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Represents health and life
insurance payments of $10,514 and $11,712, and costs of $19,406
and $24,229 related to automobiles purchased by our company for
use by Mr. Greenberg for 2007 and 2006, respectively. The
aggregate incremental costs of automobile usage are based on
depreciation expense for an automobile purchased in 2006 and
automobile insurance premiums paid by our company on behalf of
Mr. Greenberg.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Represents health and life
insurance payments of $14,150 and $16,240, and payments of
health club membership fees of $1,049 and $1,020 for 2007 and
2006, respectively, in addition to matching contributions of
$6,600 that we made under the 401(k) Plan for each year.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Represents health and life
insurance payments of $14,340 and $16,240, and costs of $27,115
and $18,153 related to automobiles purchased by our company for
use by Mr. Greenberg for 2007 and 2006, respectively, in
addition to matching contributions of $6,600 that we made under
the 401(k) Plan for each year. The aggregate incremental costs
of automobile usage are based on depreciation expense for an
automobile purchased in 2006 and automobile insurance premiums
paid by our company on behalf of Mr. Greenberg.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Represents health and life
insurance payments of $9,354 and $10,423, payments of health
club membership fees of $1,049 and $1,020, and costs of $40,511
and $35,531 related to automobiles leased or purchased by our
company for use by Mr. Weinberg for 2007 and 2006,
respectively, in addition to matching contributions of $6,600
that we made under the 401(k) Plan for each year. The aggregate
incremental
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
costs of automobile usage are based
on depreciation expense for an automobile purchased in 2006,
payments for another automobile leased prior to the one
purchased in 2006 and automobile insurance premiums paid by our
company on behalf of Mr. Weinberg.
|
|
(8)
|
|
Represents health and life
insurance payments of $14,340 and $11,014 for 2007 and 2006,
respectively, and matching contributions of $125 that we made
under the 401(k) Plan for each year.
|
2006
Annual Incentive Compensation Plan
The 2006 Plan, which is designed to satisfy the requirements of
Section 162(m), generally provides for performance-based
incentive awards to certain of our key employees.
The 2006 Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors (the Committee). The
Committee has the authority and discretion to administer and
interpret the provisions of the 2006 Plan and to adopt such
rules and regulations for the administration of the 2006 Plan as
the Committee deems necessary or advisable. Decisions of the
Committee are final, conclusive and binding upon all parties,
including, without limitation, our company and participants in
the 2006 Plan. The Committee may designate all or any portion of
its power and authority under the 2006 Plan to any sub-committee
of the Committee or to any of our executive officers, provided
that any such designation is consistent with the requirements of
Section 162(m).
The individuals eligible to participate in the 2006 Plan are our
Chief Executive Officer and any other executive officer of our
company or a subsidiary thereof. Prior to or at the time
performance objectives are established for a fiscal quarter,
fiscal year or such other period of our company that the
Committee, in its sole discretion, may establish up to five
years in length (collectively, Performance Period),
the Committee identifies those executive officers including the
Chief Executive Officer who will in fact be participants for
such Performance Period.
Within the time period prescribed by Section 162(m), for
each Performance Period for which performance objectives are
established, the Committee (i) determines the participants
who are to be eligible to receive performance-based awards under
the 2006 Plan, (ii) selects the performance criteria to be
used for each participant and (iii) establishes, in terms
of an objective formula or standard for each participant, the
performance goal and the amount of each award which may be
earned if such performance goal is achieved.
The performance criteria are as follows: net sales, revenue,
revenue growth, operating income, pre- or after-tax income
(before or after allocation of corporate overhead and bonus),
net earnings, earnings per share, net income, financial goals
(division, group or corporate), return on equity, total
shareholder return, return on assets or net assets, attainment
of strategic and operational initiatives, appreciation in and/or
maintenance of the price of the shares of our Class A
Common Stock or any other publicly-traded securities of our
company, market share, gross profits, earnings (including
earnings before taxes, earnings before interest and taxes or
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization),
economic value-added models, comparisons with various stock
market indices, reductions in costs, cash flow (before or after
dividends), cash flow per share (before or after dividends),
return on capital (including return on total capital or return
on invested capital), cash flow return on investment, and
improvement in or attainment of expense levels or working
capital levels.
In determining satisfaction with performance goals for a
Performance Period, the Committee may direct that adjustments be
made to the performance goals or actual financial performance
results as reported to reflect extraordinary, unusual or
non-recurring organizational, operational or other changes that
have occurred during such Performance Period, in each case only
to the extent that such adjustments are consistent with the
requirements of Section 162(m).
At such time as it determines appropriate following the
conclusion of each Performance Period, the Committee certifies,
in writing, the amount of the award for each participant for
such Performance Period. The amount of an award actually paid to
a participant may, in the sole discretion of the Committee, be
reduced to less than the amount payable to the participant based
on attainment of the performance goals for a Performance Period.
Payment of an award to each participant shall be made no later
than the fifteenth day of the third month following the end of
the our fiscal quarter in which the applicable Performance
Period ends.
The 2006 Plan is effective for fiscal years 2006 through 2010,
after which our stockholders must re-approve the 2006 Plan for
an additional five years at our annual meeting of stockholders
in 2011 in order for awards under the 2006 Plan to continue to
qualify as performance-based compensation under
Section 162(m). The Committee may at any time alter, amend,
suspend or terminate the 2006 Plan as it shall deem advisable,
subject to any requirement for
15
stockholder approval as required by applicable law, including
Section 162(m), and our obligations under our listing
agreement with the NYSE. No amendments to, or termination of,
the 2006 Plan shall in any way impair the rights of a
participant under any award previously granted without such
participants consent.
We may deduct from any payments of awards under the 2006 Plan
any applicable withholding taxes required by law to be withheld
with respect to such payments.
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards in Fiscal 2007
The following table provides information about plan-based awards
granted to the Named Executive Officers in 2007, specifically,
the grant date and the estimated future payouts under non-equity
incentive plan awards, which consist of potential payouts under
the 2006 Annual Incentive Compensation Plan that were awarded in
2007 for the performance period covering fiscal 2007. The Named
Executive Officers did not receive any grants of equity
incentive plan awards or other stock or option awards in 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payments Under
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
Awards(1)
|
|
Name of Executive
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Threshold ($)
|
|
|
Target ($)
|
|
|
Maximum ($)
|
|
|
Robert Greenberg
|
|
|
3/30/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,706,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frederick Schneider
|
|
|
3/30/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191,266
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Greenberg
|
|
|
3/30/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
873,798
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Weinberg
|
|
|
3/30/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
528,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Nason
|
|
|
3/30/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
382,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
These columns are intended to show
the potential value of the payments for each Named Executive
Officer under the 2006 Plan if the threshold, target or maximum
goals are satisfied for the performance measures. The potential
payments are performance-driven and therefore completely at
risk. Incentive compensation is conditioned on our company
achieving a minimum or threshold performance level, and no
payments are made to the Named Executive Officers if the
threshold performance levels are not met. The Compensation
Committee approved the performance goals during the first
quarter of 2007 for fiscal 2007. Additional information
regarding the business measurements and performance goals for
determining the payments are described in the section entitled
Compensation Discussion and Analysis in this
proxy statement. There are no specific target amounts that can
be determined, as any incentive compensation for each Named
Executive Officer is based on pre-approved percentages in excess
of certain performance goals of Skechers. The target amounts
presented in this table represent the actual payments of
non-equity incentive compensation to each of our Named Executive
Officers that was earned in fiscal 2007. There are no maximum
amounts presented in this table because when determining the
performance goals, the Compensation Committee did not place a
limit on the non-equity incentive compensation that could be
earned by the Named Executive Officers in fiscal 2007, although
the maximum amount of incentive compensation that any Named
Executive Officer may earn in a
12-month
period under the 2006 Plan is $5,000,000.
|
Options
Exercised and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2007
The following table provides information for the Named Executive
Officers regarding the number of shares acquired in 2007 upon
the vesting of restricted stock awards and the value realized
before payment of any applicable withholding tax and broker
commissions. None of the Named Executive Officers exercised
stock options in 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Value Realized
|
|
Name of Executive
|
|
Acquired on Vesting (#)
|
|
|
on Vesting ($)
|
|
Robert Greenberg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frederick Schneider
|
|
|
2,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
67,340
|
|
Michael Greenberg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Weinberg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Nason
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Mr. Schneider held 2,000
restricted shares that vested on January 3, 2007, when the
closing price per share was $33.67. A
|
Outstanding
Equity Awards at 2007 Fiscal Year-End
The following table provides information on the outstanding
stock option and stock awards held by the Named Executive
Officers as of December 31, 2007. This table includes
unexercised option awards and unvested shares of
16
restricted stock. Each equity award is shown separately for each
Named Executive Officer. The market value of the stock award is
based on the closing price of our Class A Common Stock as
of December 31, 2007, which was $19.51. For additional
information about option awards and stock awards, see the
description of equity-based compensation in the section entitled
Compensation Discussion and Analysis in this
proxy statement. The Named Executive Officers did not hold any
shares underlying unexercised options, unvested shares of stock,
units or other rights under any equity incentive plan that had
not been earned as of December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or
|
|
|
Market Value
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units of
|
|
|
of Shares or
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Stock That
|
|
|
Units of Stock
|
|
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
Have Not
|
|
|
That Have
|
|
Name of Executive
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
Price ($)
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Vested (#)
|
|
|
Not Vested ($)
|
|
|
Robert Greenberg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frederick Schneider
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
8.35
|
|
|
|
2/5/14
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
117,060
|
|
Michael Greenberg
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
13.00
|
|
|
|
7/6/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Weinberg
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
13.00
|
|
|
|
7/6/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
15.50
|
|
|
|
1/1/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
24.00
|
|
|
|
4/1/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
10.58
|
|
|
|
11/6/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,453
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
8.35
|
|
|
|
2/5/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Nason
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
2.78
|
|
|
|
1/15/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,118
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3.94
|
|
|
|
2/1/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,200
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
13.00
|
|
|
|
7/6/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
15.50
|
|
|
|
1/1/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
24.00
|
|
|
|
4/1/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,200
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
10.58
|
|
|
|
11/6/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
6.95
|
|
|
|
10/9/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
8.35
|
|
|
|
2/5/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
On January 3, 2006,
Mr. Schneider was issued 10,000 restricted shares of
Class A Common Stock, of which 2,000 shares vested
immediately upon issuance, 2,000 shares vested on
January 3, 2007 and 2,000 shares vest each anniversary
thereafter for three years. A
|
Change of
Control Benefits
Upon a change of control under the 1998 Stock Plan,
Frederick Schneider would be entitled to full vesting of his
outstanding restricted stock valued at $117,060 based on the
closing price of our Class A Common Stock on
December 31, 2007. As of December 31, 2007, there were
no outstanding unexercisable stock options under the 1998 Stock
Plan held by any of the Named Executive Officers, which would be
subject to full vesting upon a change of control. For additional
information about change of control terms under the 1998 Stock
Plan, see the description of 1998 Stock Plan provisions in the
section entitled Compensation Discussion and
Analysis in this proxy statement. As of
December 31, 2007, there were no outstanding awards under
the 2007 Plan, which would be entitled to any change of control
benefits, although the change of control terms of the 2007 Plan
are substantially similar to those of the 1998 Stock Plan.
17
Securities
Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation
Plans
The following table provides information as of December 31,
2007 regarding compensation plans (including individual
compensation arrangements) under which our equity securities are
authorized for issuance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available
|
|
|
to be Issued Upon
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
for Future Issuance
|
|
|
Exercise of
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
Under Equity Compensation
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
Plans (Excluding Securities
|
Plan Category
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
Reflected in Column (a))
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
1,961,756
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
11.56
|
|
|
|
15,141,459
|
(2)
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,961,756
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,141,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents 1,961,756 stock options
outstanding under the 1998 Stock Plan. Amount does not include
an additional 15,167 shares of restricted stock that were
outstanding with a weighted-average grant date fair value of
$18.32.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Represents 3,258,209 shares
available for issuance under the 1998 Stock Plan,
1,383,250 shares available for issuance under the Amended
and Restated 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the 1998
ESPP), 7,500,000 shares available for issuance under
the 2007 Plan and 3,000,000 shares available for issuance
under the 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the 2008
ESPP). The shares available for issuance under the 1998
Stock Plan and the 2007 Stock Plan are available for issuance as
restricted stock and other forms of equity-based compensation in
addition to stock options, warrants and rights. However, the
1998 Stock Plan and the 1998 ESPP were terminated and no
additional granting of awards or rights under those plans were
permitted after December 31, 2007. The number of shares
available for future issuance under the 2008 ESPP Plan may be
adjusted on January 1, 2009 and each anniversary thereof
for increases equal to the least of 500,000 shares, 1% of
the outstanding shares of our capital stock on such date or a
lesser amount as may be determined by our Board of Directors.
|
18
DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth information concerning the
compensation earned by our directors during 2007. Robert
Greenberg, Michael Greenberg, David Weinberg and Jeffrey
Greenberg are not included because as employee directors, they
did not earn any additional compensation for services provided
as members of our Board of Directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned or
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Paid in Cash
($)(1)
|
|
|
Awards
($)(2)
|
|
|
Awards
($)(3)
|
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
|
Morton D. Erlich
|
|
|
72,000
|
|
|
|
31,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,320
|
|
Geyer Kosinski
|
|
|
55,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,708
|
|
|
|
58,208
|
|
Richard Siskind
|
|
|
62,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,708
|
|
|
|
64,708
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
This column reports the amount of
cash compensation earned in 2007 for Board and committee service.
|
|
(2)
|
|
This column represents the dollar
amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes
with respect to the 2007 fiscal year in accordance with
SFAS 123R for the fair value of restricted stock that
vested in 2007. These shares represent restricted stock that was
awarded in 2006, as we did not grant any stock awards prior to
2006 and we did not grant any stock awards to directors in 2007.
These stock awards are subject to certain restrictions that
lapse over a period of four years, with 20% of the shares
vesting on the date of award in 2006 and 20% vesting each
anniversary thereafter, with all such shares fully vested on the
fourth anniversary of the award date. The fair value of the
award granted to Mr. Erlich was calculated using the
closing price of $15.66 for our Class A Common Stock on the
New York Stock Exchange on the date of grant, which was
January 3, 2006. Mr. Erlich was the only non-employee
director with an outstanding stock award at 2007 fiscal
year-end, holding 8,000 restricted shares of Class A Common
Stock, of which 2,000 shares were vested and
6,000 shares remained restricted.
|
|
(3)
|
|
This column represents the dollar
amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes
with respect to the 2007 fiscal year in accordance with
SFAS 123R for the fair value of all stock options granted
to the non-employee directors. We have not granted stock options
to our directors since 2004. These stock options vested over a
period of three years, with 25% vesting on the date of grant in
2004 and 25% vesting each anniversary thereafter, with all such
options exercisable on the third anniversary of the grant date.
The fair value was estimated using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model in accordance with SFAS 123R. The fair
value per option was $5.49 based on assumptions of five years
expected life, expected volatility of 73%, a risk free rate of
3.23% and no expected dividend yield. We have not granted stock
options to non-employee directors since 2004. The following
non-employee directors had outstanding option awards at 2007
fiscal year-end: Messrs. Kosinski and Siskind held options
to purchase 35,000 shares and 75,000 shares,
respectively.
|
Non-Employee Directors. We paid each of our
non-employee directors annual compensation of $30,000 for
serving on the Board of Directors in 2007. Our Audit Committee
Chairman and Compensation Committee Chairman were paid
additional annual fees of $15,000 and $5,000, respectively, in
2007. Non-employee directors also received fees of $1,500 for
each Board and committee meeting attended during 2007.
Non-employee directors are reimbursed for reasonable costs and
expenses incurred for attending any of our Board or committee
meetings. Compensation, fees, and reimbursable costs and
expenses are paid quarterly. During 2007, non-employee directors
were not issued any restricted shares of Class A Common
Stock nor granted any options to purchase shares of Class A
Common Stock under the 1998 Stock Plan. As of January 1,
2008, non-employee directors were eligible to receive awards of
restricted shares of Class A Common Stock, grants of
options to purchase shares of Class A Common Stock and
other equity-based compensation under the 2007 Plan as
determined by the Board of Directors.
Employee Directors. As of December 31,
2007, Robert Greenberg, Michael Greenberg and David Weinberg
were the only Named Executive Officers serving on our Board of
Directors, and Jeffrey Greenberg was the only non-executive
employee serving on our Board of Directors. Employees of
Skechers who are members of the Board of Directors are not paid
any directors fees. Compensation of Robert Greenberg,
Michael Greenberg and David Weinberg earned in 2007 is set forth
under Executive Compensation. Compensation of
Jeffrey Greenberg earned in 2007 is discussed in the section
entitled Transactions with Related Persons in
this proxy statement. During 2007, employee directors were not
awarded any restricted shares of Class A Common Stock nor
granted any options to purchase shares of Class A Common
Stock under the 1998 Stock Plan. As of January 1, 2008,
employee directors were eligible to receive awards of shares of
Class A Common Stock, grants of options to purchase shares
of Class A Common Stock and other equity-based compensation
under the 2007 Plan as determined by the Board of Directors. In
January 2008, they were awarded shares of restricted stock as a
component of their total compensation as executive employees for
the 2008 fiscal year.
19
REPORT OF
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Audit Committee consists of three non-employee directors who
are independent under the standards adopted by the Board of
Directors and applicable NYSE Rules and SEC standards. The Audit
Committee is responsible for oversight and evaluation of the
quality and integrity of Skechers financial statements,
Skechers compliance with legal and regulatory
requirements, the qualifications and independence of
Skechers registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, and
the performance of Skechers internal audit function and of
KPMG LLP.
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with
Skechers management, internal finance staff, internal
auditors and KPMG LLP, with and without management present,
Skechers audited financial statements for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2007, managements assessment of
the effectiveness of Skechers internal controls over
financial reporting and KPMG LLPs evaluation of
Skechers internal controls over financial reporting. The
Audit Committee has also discussed with KPMG LLP the results of
the independent auditors examinations and the judgments of
KPMG LLP concerning the quality, as well as the acceptability,
of Skechers accounting principles and such other matters
that Skechers is required to discuss with the independent
auditors under applicable rules, regulations or generally
accepted auditing standards (including Statement on Auditing
Standards No. 114). In addition, the Audit Committee has
received from KPMG LLP the written disclosures required by
Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, as amended,
and has discussed with KPMG LLP their independence from Skechers
and management, including a consideration of the compatibility
of non-audit services with their independence, the scope of the
audit and the fees paid to KPMG LLP during the year.
Based on our review and the discussions referred to above, the
Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the
audited financial statements be included in Skechers
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007 for filing with the
SEC.
Respectfully submitted,
Morton D. Erlich, Chairman
Geyer Kosinski
Richard Siskind
20
INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Fees to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for
Fiscal Years 2007 and 2006
We retained KPMG LLP to provide services for fiscal years 2007
and 2006 in the categories and amounts as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Audit
fees(1)
|
|
$
|
1,554,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,577,000
|
|
Audit-related fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
fees(2)
|
|
|
177,000
|
|
|
|
173,000
|
|
All other
fees(3)
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
63,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total audit and non-audit fees
|
|
$
|
1,831,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,813,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
These are fees for professional
services performed by KPMG LLP for the audit of our annual
financial statements and the review of our annual report on
Form 10-K,
the review of financial statements included in our quarterly
reports on
Form 10-Q,
the attestation of the effectiveness of internal controls under
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended,
and consultations regarding financial accounting and reporting,
as well as for services that are normally provided in connection
with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
|
|
(2)
|
|
These are fees for professional
services performed by KPMG LLP with respect to U.S. federal,
state and international tax compliance, tax consulting and tax
work stemming from Audit items. This includes
preparation of original tax returns for our company and its
consolidated subsidiaries.
|
|
(3)
|
|
These are fees for other
permissible work performed by KPMG LLP that does not meet the
other category descriptions.
|
Pre-Approval
Policy
The Audit Committees Pre-Approval Policy provides for
pre-approval of specifically described audit, audit-related, tax
and all other services by the Audit Committee in order to ensure
that the provision of such services does not impair the
independent registered public accounting firms
independence. The Pre-Approval Policy also provides a list of
prohibited non-audit services. Unless a type of service to be
provided by the independent registered public accounting firm
has received general pre-approval, the requested service will
require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee. The term
of any pre-approved services is 12 months from the date of
pre-approval, unless the Audit Committee specifically provides
for a different period. The Audit Committee will periodically
review and may revise the list of pre-approved services, based
on subsequent determinations. Pre-approval fee levels for all
services to be provided by the independent registered public
accounting firm are established annually by the Audit Committee
after the independent registered public accounting firms
appointment for the then current fiscal year has been ratified
by our stockholders at the Annual Meeting. Any fees for proposed
services exceeding these levels will also require specific
pre-approval by the Audit Committee.
Attendance
at Annual Meeting
A representative of KPMG LLP will attend the Annual Meeting to
make any statements he or she may desire and to respond to
appropriate stockholder questions.
21
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
beneficial ownership of Class A Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock as of March 31, 2008 by
(i) each of our directors, (ii) each of our Named
Executive Officers, (iii) each person that we know to be a
beneficial owner of more than 5% of either class of our Common
Stock and (iv) all of our directors and executive officers
as a group.
Each stockholders percentage of ownership in the following
table is based upon 33,287,596 shares of Class A
Common Stock and 12,851,789 shares of Class B Common
Stock outstanding as of March 31, 2008. Our Class B
Common Stock is convertible at any time into shares of
Class A Common Stock on a
one-for-one
basis. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with SEC
rules and regulations. In computing the number of shares of our
Class A Common Stock beneficially owned by a person and the
percentage of beneficial ownership of that person, shares of
Class A Common Stock underlying notes, options or shares of
Class B Common Stock held by that person that are
convertible or exercisable, as the case may be, within
60 days of March 31, 2008 are included. Those shares,
however, are not deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing
the percentage ownership of any other person. See the section
entitled Transactions with Related Persons in
this proxy statement for a description of transactions between
the Greenberg Family Trust, of which Robert Greenberg is a
trustee, Michael Greenberg and our company. To our knowledge,
unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to this table and
subject to applicable community property laws, each person named
in the table has sole voting and investment power with respect
to the shares of Class A and Class B Common Stock set
forth opposite such persons name. Unless otherwise
indicated in the footnotes below, the address of each beneficial
owner listed below is c/o Skechers U.S.A., Inc., 228 Manhattan
Beach Boulevard, Manhattan Beach, California 90266.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
Number of
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
Class A Shares
|
|
Class A Shares
|
|
Class B Shares
|
|
Class B Shares
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
Beneficially Owned
|
|
5% stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wellington Management Company, LLP
|
|
|
3,141,875
|
(1)
|
|
|
9.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defiance Asset Management, LLC
|
|
|
1,996,359
|
(2)
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Named Executive Officers and directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Greenberg
|
|
|
10,061,478
|
(3)
|
|
|
23.2
|
|
|
|
10,031,840
|
(4)
|
|
|
78.1
|
%
|
Michael Greenberg
|
|
|
896,883
|
(5)
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
799,991
|
(6)
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
Jeffrey Greenberg
|
|
|
747,526
|
(7)
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
624,834
|
(8)
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
David Weinberg
|
|
|
286,890
|
(9)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Nason
|
|
|
140,333
|
(10)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frederick Schneider
|
|
|
73,266
|
(11)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Philip Paccione
|
|
|
21,403
|
(12)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Morton D. Erlich
|
|
|
8,000
|
(13)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geyer Kosinski
|
|
|
35,000
|
(14)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Siskind
|
|
|
89,333
|
(15)
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All current directors and executive officers as a group (10
persons)
|
|
|
12,360,112
|
(16)
|
|
|
27.3
|
%
|
|
|
11,456,665
|
|
|
|
89.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Less than 1.0%
|
|
(1)
|
|
Information is based on a
Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2008
and represents the number of shares reported as beneficially
owned as of December 31, 2007. Wellington Management
Company, LLP (Wellington), in its capacity as
investment adviser, may be deemed to beneficially own
3,141,875 shares that are held of record by its clients.
Wellington has shared voting power with respect to 2,012,604 of
the shares that it beneficially owns and shared dispositive
power with respect to 3,080,075 of these shares. Principal
business office of Wellington is located at 75 State Street,
Boston, Massachusetts 02109.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Information is based on a
Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2008
and represents the number of shares beneficially owned as of
December 31, 2007. Defiance Asset Management, LLC
(Defiance), Robert Marcin and Steve Epstein have
shared voting power and shared dispositive power with respect to
1,996,359 shares. Principal business office of Defiance is
located at 100 Front Street, Suite 920, West Conshohocken,
PA 19428.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes 10,031,840 shares of
Class B Common Stock that are convertible at any time into
shares of Class A Common Stock on a
one-for-one
basis. Beneficial ownership of these shares is described in
greater detail in note 4 below.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Represents 10,031,840 shares
of Class B Common Stock held by the Greenberg Family Trust
(the Trust) that Robert Greenberg, our Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, is deemed to
beneficially own as a trustee of the Trust. His wife, Susan
Greenberg, is also a trustee of the Trust and is also deemed to
beneficially own all shares held by the Trust.
|
22
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
Includes 799,991 shares of
Class B Common Stock that are convertible at any time into
shares of Class A Common Stock on a
one-for-one
basis, 37,500 shares of Class A Common Stock
underlying options that are exercisable currently or within
60 days of March 31, 2008 and 22,650 shares of
Class A Common Stock beneficially owned by Michael
Greenberg, our President and a member of our Board of Directors,
indirectly through his wife, Wendy Greenberg, and their
children. Mr. Greenberg disclaims beneficial ownership of
these 22,650 shares except to the extent of his pecuniary
interest therein. Beneficial ownership of the
799,991 shares of Class B Common Stock is described in
greater detail in note 6 below.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Represents 748,691 shares of
Class B Common Stock held by the Michael and Wendy
Greenberg Family Trust that Michael Greenberg is deemed to
beneficially own as trustee of such trust, and
51,300 shares of Class B Common Stock held in various
trust accounts for Mr. Greenbergs minor children and
of which a third party acts as trustee. Mr. Greenberg
disclaims beneficial ownership of these 51,300 shares
except to the extent of his pecuniary interest therein.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Includes 624,834 shares of
Class B Common Stock that are convertible at any time into
shares of Class A Common Stock on a
one-for-one
basis and 47,260 shares of Class A Common Stock
underlying options that are exercisable currently or within
60 days of March 31, 2008. Beneficial ownership of the
624,834 shares of Class B Common Stock is described in
greater detail in note 8 below.
|
|
(8)
|
|
Represents 549,830 shares of
Class B Common Stock held by the Jeffrey and Lori Greenberg
Family Trust that Jeffrey Greenberg, a member of our Board of
Directors, is deemed to beneficially own as trustee of such
trust. Also represents 36,476 shares of Class B Common
Stock held by the Chloe July Greenberg 2004 Trust and
30,000 shares of Class B Common Stock held by the
Catherine Elle Greenberg 2006 Trust that Mr. Greenberg is
deemed to beneficially own as trustee of such trusts, and
5,914 shares of Class B Common Stock held by the Chloe
July Greenberg custodial account and 2,614 shares of
Class B Common Stock held by the Catherine Elle Greenberg
custodial account, for which one of his siblings acts as
custodian. These trust accounts and custodial accounts are for
Mr. Greenbergs two daughters who are minors, and he
disclaims beneficial ownership of the 8,528 shares held in
the two custodial accounts except to the extent of his pecuniary
interest therein.
|
|
(9)
|
|
Includes 97,654 shares of
Class A Common Stock that David Weinberg, our Chief
Operating Officer, Executive Vice President and a member of our
Board of Directors, is deemed to beneficially own as sole
trustee of The David Weinberg Trust dated September 7,
2000, and 171,453 shares of Class A Common Stock
underlying options that are exercisable currently or within
60 days of March 31, 2008.
|
|
(10)
|
|
Includes 124,018 shares of
Class A Common Stock underlying options that are
exercisable currently or within 60 days of March 31,
2008.
|
|
(11)
|
|
Includes 40,000 shares of
Class A Common Stock underlying options that are
exercisable currently or within 60 days of March 31,
2008, 15,000 shares held by the Schneider Limited
Partnership that Frederick Schneider, our ChiefFinancial
Officer, is deemed to beneficially own as its general partner
and 8,338 shares held by The Schneider CA Partnership that
Mr. Schneider is deemed to beneficially own as its general
partner.
|
|
(12)
|
|
Includes 15,000 shares of
Class A Common Stock underlying options that are
exercisable currently or within 60 days of March 31,
2008.
|
|
(13)
|
|
Includes 4,000 shares of
Class A Common Stock held by The Erlich Family Trust that
Morton D. Erlich, a member of our Board of Directors, is deemed
to beneficially own as a trustee of such trust.
|
|
(14)
|
|
Represents shares of Class A
Common Stock underlying options that are exercisable currently
or within 60 days of March 31, 2008.
|
|
(15)
|
|
Includes 75,000 shares of
Class A Common Stock underlying options that are
exercisable currently or within 60 days of March 31,
2008.
|
|
(16)
|
|
Includes 545,231 shares of
Class A Common Stock underlying options that are
exercisable currently or within 60 days of March 31,
2008 by our executive officers and Board of Directors.
|
23
COMPLIANCE
WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our officers,
directors and persons who own more than ten percent of a
registered class of our securities, to file with the SEC reports
of initial ownership (Form 3s) and reports of changes
in ownership (Form 4s and 5s) of our
securities. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent
stockholders are required by the SECs regulations to
furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms that they
file. Based on our review of copies of Form 3s,
4s and 5s furnished to us as well as communications
with our officers, directors and greater than ten percent
stockholders, we believe that all of them complied with the
filing requirements of Section 16(a) and we are not aware
of any late or missed filings of such reports for the 2007
fiscal year.
TRANSACTIONS
WITH RELATED PERSONS
Policies
and Procedures
As provided in our Audit Committee Charter, a copy of which is
attached as Appendix A to this proxy statement, the
Audit Committee shall review (i) at least annually a
summary of directors and executive officers related
party transactions and potential conflicts of interest and our
policies relating to the avoidance of conflicts of interest
(which is discussed in our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics),
(ii) past and proposed transactions between our company, on
the one hand, and any of our directors or executive officers, on
the other hand, and (iii) policies and procedures as well
as audit results associated with directors and executive
officers expense accounts and perquisites, including the
use of corporate assets.
Our Policies and Procedures for Related Person Transactions (the
Policy), which was adopted by the Board of Directors
as of March 8, 2007, covers any transaction, arrangement or
relationship, or series of similar transactions, arrangements or
relationships, (including any indebtedness or guarantee of
indebtedness) in which (i) the aggregate amount involved
will or may be expected to exceed $100,000 in any calendar year,
(ii) we are a participant, and (iii) any Related
Person has or will have a direct or indirect interest (other
than solely as a result of being a director or a less than ten
percent beneficial owner of another entity). A Related
Person is any (a) person who is or was (since the
beginning of the last fiscal year for which we have filed a
Form 10-K
and proxy statement, even if they do not presently serve in that
role) an executive officer, director or nominee for election as
a director of Skechers, (b) greater than five percent
beneficial owner of our Class A or Class B Common
Stock or (c) immediate family member of either of the
foregoing.
Certain categories of transactions with Related Persons (such as
transactions involving competitive bids) have been reviewed and
pre-approved by the Audit Committee under the Policy. The Audit
Committee shall review the material facts of all other
transactions with Related Persons that require the
Committees approval. If advance approval by the Audit
Committee of a transaction with a Related Person is not
feasible, then the transaction shall be considered and, if the
Committee determines it to be appropriate, ratified at the
Committees next regularly scheduled meeting. Factors that
the Audit Committee will take into account include whether the
transaction with a Related Person is on terms no less favorable
than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third-party
under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the
Related Persons interest in the transaction. No Audit
Committee member shall participate in any discussion or approval
of a transaction with a Related Person pursuant to which he is a
Related Person except for providing material information
concerning the transaction. For those transactions with a
Related Person that are ongoing, the Audit Committee, on at
least an annual basis, shall review and assess ongoing
relationships with the Related Person to determine that the
Related Person remains appropriate.
The following list of transactions with Related Persons includes
all such transactions that took place since January 1,
2007, which were identified by the Audit Committee, and each of
these transactions was reviewed, and approved or ratified by the
Audit Committee, pursuant to the policies and procedures
discussed herein.
Related
Person Transactions
As of March 31, 2008, Robert Greenberg, who is our Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, his children and the
Greenberg Family Trust, collectively, beneficially own 99.6% of
our Class B Common Stock and
24
approximately 79.5% of the combined voting power of our
Class A and Class B Common Stock. Robert Greenberg,
directly and indirectly through the Greenberg Family Trust,
beneficially owns approximately 62.0% of the combined voting
power of our Class A and Class B Common Stock. As a
result, Robert Greenberg is a control person of
Skechers within the meaning of the rules and regulations
promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and we
are considered a Controlled Company under the NYSE
Rules and are thereby exempt from certain listing requirements
and regulations as set forth in the NYSE Rules. Michael
Greenberg, who is our President, and Jeffrey Greenberg, both of
whom are members of our Board of Directors, are each
beneficiaries of the Greenberg Family Trust, which influences
the election of Robert Greenberg, Michael Greenberg and Jeffrey
Greenberg to our Board of Directors.
Shares of our Class A Common Stock issuable upon conversion
of shares of Class B Common Stock held by the Greenberg
Family Trust and Michael Greenberg are subject to certain
registration rights. We entered into a registration rights
agreement with the Greenberg Family Trust and Michael Greenberg
pursuant to which we agreed that we will, on up to two separate
occasions per year, register up to one-third of the shares of
our Class A Common Stock issuable upon conversion of their
shares of Class B Common Stock beneficially owned as of our
initial public offering of Class A Common Stock by each
such stockholder in any one year, provided, among other
conditions, that the underwriters of any such offering have the
right to limit the number of shares included in such
registration. We also agreed that, if we cause a registration
statement to be filed with the SEC, each such stockholder shall
have the right to include in such registration statement up to
one-third of the shares of our Class A Common Stock
issuable upon conversion of their shares of Class B Common
Stock beneficially owned as of our initial public offering of
Class A Common Stock provided, among other conditions, that
the underwriters of any such offering have the right to limit
the number of shares included in such registration. All expenses
of such registrations shall be at our expense.
Michael Greenberg owns a 12% beneficial ownership interest in
Manhattan Inn Operating Company, LLC (MIOC), the
primary business of which is to own and operate the Shade Hotel,
which opened in Manhattan Beach, California in November 2005.
Michael Greenberg, David Weinberg, who is our Chief Operating
Officer, Executive Vice President and a member of our Board of
Directors, and Michael Greenbergs brothers Jeffrey
Greenberg, who is a director of Skechers, and Jason and Joshua
Greenberg, all of whom are senior vice presidents of Skechers,
own in aggregate a 17% beneficial ownership interest in MIOC.
During 2007, we paid approximately $175,000 to the Shade Hotel
for lodging, food and events that were held there including our
annual holiday party.
Jeffrey Greenberg, Jason Greenberg and Joshua Greenberg, who are
the children of Robert Greenberg and also the siblings of
Michael Greenberg, are non-executive employees of Skechers, and
they earned total compensation of $746,843, $793,105 and
$772,900, respectively, in 2007. Jeffrey Greenberg was also a
member of our Board of Directors in 2007, but did not earn any
additional compensation for services provided as a director.
25
NOMINATIONS
AND STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2009 ANNUAL MEETING
Stockholder proposals intended to be presented at our next
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in 2009 must be
received at our principal executive offices no later than
January 1, 2009 to be considered for inclusion in the proxy
statement and form of proxy relating to that meeting. Proposals
must comply with the proxy rules relating to stockholder
proposals, in particular
Rule 14a-8
under the Exchange Act, to be included in our proxy materials.
Stockholders who wish to submit a proposal for consideration at
our 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, but who do not wish to
submit a proposal for inclusion in our proxy statement, must, in
accordance with our bylaws, deliver a copy of their proposal no
later than the close of business on the 60th day nor earlier
than the close of business on the 90th day in advance of such
meeting. In either case, proposals should be delivered to
Skechers U.S.A., Inc., 228 Manhattan Beach Boulevard, Manhattan
Beach, California 90266, Attention: Michael Greenberg,
President. To avoid controversy and establish timely receipt by
our company, it is suggested that stockholders send their
proposals by certified mail, return receipt requested.
STOCKHOLDER
COMMUNICATION WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Stockholders and other interested parties who wish to contact
our Presiding Independent Director, Morton D. Erlich, or any of
our other directors either individually or as a group may do so
by writing to them c/o Philip Paccione, Corporate Secretary,
Skechers U.S.A., Inc., 228 Manhattan Beach Boulevard, Manhattan
Beach, California 90266. Each writing interested party should
specify whether the communication is directed to our entire
Board of Directors, to only the non-management directors or to a
particular director. Our personnel will review the
communications and screen improper and irrelevant communications
such as solicitations.
OTHER
BUSINESS
Our Board of Directors does not know of any other matter to be
acted upon at the meeting. However, if any other matter shall
properly come before the meeting, the proxyholders named in the
proxy accompanying this proxy statement will have authority to
vote all proxies in accordance with their discretion.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Philip G. Paccione,
Corporate Secretary
Dated: April 30, 2008
Manhattan Beach, California
26
APPENDIX
A
SKECHERS
U.S.A., INC.
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
Purpose:
The purpose of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors is
to assist the Board in fulfilling its responsibility for
oversight and evaluation of (1) the quality and integrity
of the Companys financial statements, (2) the
Companys compliance with legal and regulatory
requirements, (3) the independent auditors
qualifications and independence, and (4) the performance of
the Companys internal audit function and independent
auditors, and such other duties as directed by the Board. The
Audit Committee is expected to maintain free and open
communication (including separate private executive sessions at
least annually) with the independent auditors, the internal
auditors and the management of the Company. In discharging this
oversight role, the Audit Committee is empowered to investigate
any matter brought to its attention, with full power to retain
external auditors, outside counsel or other experts for this
purpose. The Audit Committee shall review this Charter
periodically and recommend any proposed changes to the Board for
approval.
Audit
Committee Composition and Meetings:
The Audit Committee shall be comprised of three or more
directors as determined by the Board, each of whom shall satisfy
the independence requirements of the New York Stock Exchange and
Section 10A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and the rules
promulgated thereunder. Each member of the Audit Committee shall
be financially literate, as determined by the Board in
accordance with the New York Stock Exchange Rules. At least one
member of the Audit Committee shall (i) qualify as a
financial expert within the meaning of the rules of
the Securities and Exchange Commission and (ii) have
accounting or related financial management expertise
within the meaning of the rules of the New York Stock Exchange.
Audit Committee members shall not simultaneously serve on the
audit committees of more than three public companies.
Directors fees (including fees for attendance at meetings
of committees of the Board) are the only compensation that an
Audit Committee member may receive from the Company.
Audit Committee members shall be appointed by the Board. If an
Audit Committee Chair is not designated or present, the members
of the Audit Committee may, subject to the provisions of the
preceding paragraph, designate a Chair by majority vote of the
Audit Committee membership.
The Audit Committee shall meet at least four times annually (in
the absence of unusual circumstances), or more frequently as
circumstances dictate. The Audit Committee Chair shall approve
an agenda in advance of each meeting. The Audit Committee shall
report its activities to the Board of Directors on a regular
basis and make such recommendations as the Audit Committee may
deem necessary or appropriate.
Audit
Committee Responsibilities and Duties:
(1) The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the
appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of the
independent auditors, and any registered public accounting firm,
engaged by the Company (including resolution of disagreements
between management and the auditors regarding financial
reporting) for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit
report or performing other audit, review or attest services for
the Company or related work. The independent auditors, and each
such registered public accounting firm, shall report directly to
the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee shall have the sole
authority to appoint or replace the independent auditors that
audit the financial statements of the Company. The Audit
Committee shall have the ultimate authority and responsibility
to evaluate the qualifications, performance and independence of
the independent auditors. In the process, the Audit Committee
will (i) discuss and consider the auditors written
affirmation that the auditors are in fact independent,
(ii) discuss the nature and rigor of the audit process,
receive and review all reports and (iii) provide to the
independent auditors full access to the Audit Committee (and the
Board) to report on any and all appropriate matters. The
evaluation of the independent auditors shall include a review
and evaluation of the lead partner of the independent auditors,
taking into account the opinions of management and the
Companys internal auditors. The Audit Committee will
assure the regular rotation of the independent auditors
lead and concurring audit partners
A-1
serving on the Companys audit engagement team, as well as
the rotation of any other persons on the Companys audit
engagement team who fall within the definition of audit
partner, as defined by applicable SEC regulation, in each
case as required by applicable law. In order to assure
continuing auditor independence, the Audit Committee will
consider whether it is appropriate to adopt a policy of rotating
the Companys independent auditing firm itself on a regular
basis. The Audit Committee shall present its conclusions with
respect to the independent auditors to the full Board of
Directors.
(2) The Audit Committee shall obtain and review a report
from the independent auditors at least annually regarding
(i) the independent auditors internal quality-control
procedures, (ii) any material issues raised by the most
recent quality-control review, or peer review, of the firm, or
by any inquiry or investigation by governmental or professional
authorities within the preceding five years respecting one or
more independent audits carried out by the firm, (iii) any
steps taken to deal with any such issues, and (iv) all
relationships between the independent auditors and the Company.
(3) The Audit Committee shall review the independent
auditors audit plan - discuss scope, staffing, budget,
locations, reliance upon management, and internal audit and
general audit approach. Approve the fees and other significant
compensation to be paid to the independent auditors as well as
approve all non-audit engagements with the independent auditors.
The Audit Committee shall consult with management but shall not
delegate these responsibilities, except that pre-approvals of
non-audit services may be delegated to a single member of the
Audit Committee.
(4) The Audit Committee shall review the Companys
annual audited financial statements prior to filing or
distribution, including the Companys disclosures under
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations. Review should include
discussion with management and independent auditors of
significant issues regarding accounting principles, practices
and judgments. The Audit Committee shall advise management and
the independent auditors that they are expected to provide to
the Audit Committee a timely analysis of significant financial
reporting issues and practices; and obtain from the independent
auditors assurance that the audit was conducted in a manner
consistent with Section 10A of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, which sets forth certain procedures to be
followed in any audit of financial statements required under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
(5) The Audit Committee shall review reports from the
independent auditors on (i) the Companys critical
accounting policies and practices, (ii) all alternative
treatments of financial information permitted under GAAP that
have been discussed with management, the ramifications of the
use of such treatments and the treatment preferred by the
independent auditors, and (iii) all other material written
communications between the auditing firm and management.
(6) The Audit Committee shall review with financial
management and the independent auditors the Companys
quarterly financial results prior to the release of earnings
and/or the Companys quarterly financial statements prior
to filing or distribution including the Companys
disclosures under Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The Audit Committee shall review and discuss with financial
management earnings press releases (paying particular attention
to any use of pro forma, or adjusted
non-GAAP, information), and discuss financial information and
earnings guidance, if any, provided to analysts and rating
agencies. The Audit Committee shall discuss any significant
changes to the Companys accounting principles and any
items required to be communicated by the independent auditors in
accordance with Statement of Auditing Standards 61, as amended.
(7) The Audit Committee shall, in consultation with
management and the independent auditors, consider the adequacy
and effectiveness of the Companys financial reporting
processes and controls. The Audit Committee shall discuss
policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management,
including discussion of significant financial risk exposures and
the steps management has taken to monitor, control and report
such exposures.
(8) The Audit Committee shall review with the independent
auditors significant findings prepared by the independent
auditors together with any audit problems or difficulties and
managements responses. The review shall include the
resolution of any significant problems or difficulties and
managements responses, including with respect to:
(1) any restrictions on the scope of the independent
auditors activities or access to requested
A-2
information; (2) any significant disagreements with
management; (3) any accounting adjustments that were noted
or proposed by the auditor but were passed;
(4) any communications between the audit team and the audit
firms national office respecting auditing or accounting
issues presented by the engagement; and (5) any
management or internal controls letter
issued or proposed to be issued.. The review shall include the
resolution of any significant problems and material disputes
between management and the independent auditors and a discussion
with the independent auditors out of managements presence
of the quality of the Companys accounting principles as
applied in its financial reporting, including any significant
changes in the Companys selection or application of
accounting principles, the clarity of the Companys
financial disclosures and a discussion of other significant
decisions made by management in preparing the financial
disclosures.
(9) The Audit Committee shall obtain and review disclosures
made by the Companys principal executive officer and
principal financial officer regarding compliance with their
certification obligations as required under the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and the rules promulgated thereunder, including the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures and internal
controls for financial reporting and evaluations thereof.
(10) The Audit Committee shall review with the
Companys General Counsel legal matters that may have a
material impact on the financial statements, the Companys
compliance policies and any material reports or inquiries
received from regulators or governmental agencies.
(11) The Audit Committee shall review the effect of
regulatory and accounting initiatives, as well as off-balance
sheet structures, on the financial statements of the Company.
(12) The Audit Committee shall meet at least annually and
separately with management, with internal auditors (or other
personnel responsible for the internal audit function) and with
independent auditors.
(13) With respect to the Companys internal audit
function, the Audit Committee shall:
|
|
|
|
|
review the appointment, retention and/or replacement of the
director of the internal audit department (or other person,
persons or outside firm responsible for the Companys
internal audit function) and ensure the independence of the
director of the internal audit department, or, at the discretion
of the Board, select and contract with an outside accounting
firm to serve as the Companys internal auditors and
perform the Companys internal audit function;
|
|
|
|
approve, and periodically review and revise as necessary, an
Internal Audit Charter, which describes the mission, scope of
work, independence, authority, and responsibilities conferred by
the Audit Committee on the Companys Internal Audit
function;
|
|
|
|
advise the director of the internal audit department (or other
person, persons or outside firm responsible for the
Companys internal audit function) that he or she is
expected to provide to the Audit Committee summaries of and, as
appropriate, the significant reports to management prepared by
the internal audit department (or other person, persons or
outside firm responsible for the Companys internal audit
function) and managements responses thereto and review
such reports; and
|
|
|
|
discuss with the Companys independent auditors
responsibilities of the internal audit department (or such other
person, persons or outside firm responsible for the
Companys internal audit function), the budget and staffing
relative to the Companys internal audit function and any
recommended changes in the planned scope of the Companys
internal audit.
|
(14) The Audit Committee shall receive periodic reports
from the Companys Disclosure Committee, which is
responsible for assisting the Companys Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer in fulfilling their
responsibility for oversight of the accuracy and timeliness of
the disclosures made by the Company and reviewing material
issues relating thereto.
(15) The Audit Committee shall receive periodic reports
from the independent auditors regarding the auditors
independence, discuss such reports with the auditors, and, if so
determined by the Audit Committee, take appropriate action to
satisfy itself of the independence of the auditors.
A-3
(16) The Audit Committee shall review the Companys
policies and practices related to compliance with the law, the
Companys Code of Ethical Conduct, and conflicts of
interest, to be satisfied that such policies are adequate and
adhered to by the Company and its executive officers and
directors.
(17) The Audit Committee shall review (i) at least
annually a summary of directors and officers related
party transactions and potential conflicts of interest and the
Companys policies relating to the avoidance of conflicts
of interest, (ii) past and proposed transactions between
the Company, on the one hand, and any of its directors or
executive officers, on the other hand, and (iii) policies
and procedures as well as audit results associated with
directors and officers expense accounts and
perquisites, including the use of corporate assets. The Audit
Committee shall consider the results of any review of any of the
foregoing by the Companys independent auditors.
(18) The Audit Committee shall maintain and review annually
procedures for (i) the receipt, retention and treatment of
complaints received by the Committee regarding accounting,
internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and
(ii) the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of
the Company of concerns regarding questionable accounting or
auditing matters.
(19) The Audit Committee shall set clear hiring policies
for employees or former employees of the independent auditors.
(20) The Audit Committee shall annually prepare an audit
committee report to shareholders as required by the Securities
and Exchange Commission. The report should be included in the
Companys annual proxy statement.
(21) The Audit Committee shall annually conduct a
self-evaluation of the Audit Committee.
(22) The Audit Committee shall have the authority to engage
independent counsel and other advisers as it determines
necessary to carry out its duties.
(23) The Audit Committee shall provide for appropriate
funding, as determined by the Audit Committee, in its capacity
as a committee of the Board, for payment of:
|
|
|
|
|
compensation to any registered public accounting firm engaged
for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or
performing other audit, review or attest services for the
Company;
|
|
|
|
compensation of any advisors employed by the Audit Committee to
assist the Audit Committee in carrying out its duties; and
|
|
|
|
ordinary administrative expenses of the Audit Committee that are
necessary or appropriate in carrying out its duties.
|
While the Audit Committee has the responsibilities and powers
set forth in this Charter, the Audit Committees function
is one of oversight. The Companys management is
responsible for preparing the Companys financial
statements and, along with the internal auditors, for developing
and maintaining systems of internal accounting and financial
controls. The independent auditors will assist the Audit
Committee and the Board in fulfilling their responsibilities for
the review of these financial statements and internal controls.
The Audit Committee expects the independent auditors to call its
attention to any accounting, auditing, internal accounting
control, regulatory or other related matters that they believe
warrant consideration or action. The Audit Committee recognizes
that the financial management and the internal and independent
auditors have more knowledge and information about the Company
than do Audit Committee members. Consequently, in carrying out
its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee does not
provide any expert or special assurance as to the Companys
financial statements or internal controls or any professional
certification as to the independent auditors work.
A-4
ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF
SKECHERS U.S.A., INC.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder
Meeting to Be Held on May 30, 2008
The Notice of Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement, 2007 Annual Report and other SEC filings are
available at the investor relations page of our corporate information website at
http://www.skx.com/investor.html.
Please date, sign and mail
your proxy card in the
envelope provided as soon
as possible.
â Please detach along perforated line and mail in the envelope provided. â
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE NOMINEES LISTED IN PROPOSAL
1. PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK
YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE. x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
|
Election of Directors
|
|
FOR ALL THE NOMINEES
|
|
WITHHOLD AUTHORITY
|
|
FOR ALL EXCEPT
|
|
NOMINEES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR ALL
NOMINEES
|
|
(See instructions
below) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
¡ Geyer Kosinski |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
¡ Richard Siskind |
INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark FOR ALL
EXCEPT and fill in the circle next to each nominee you wish to withhold, as shown here: l
Each of the persons
named as proxies
herein are
authorized, in such
persons
discretion, to vote
upon such other
matters as may
properly come
before the Annual
Meeting of
Stockholders, or
any adjournments
thereof.
|
|
|
|
|
To change the
address on your
account, please
fill in the box at
right and indicate
your new address in
the address space
above. Please note
that changes to the
registered name(s)
on the account may
not be submitted
via this
method. o
|
|
Please
check here if you plan to attend the meeting. o
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
of Stockholder:
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
|
|
Signature
of Stockholder:
|
|
|
|
Date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: |
|
Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy.
When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When signing
as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian, please
give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please
sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full
title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in
partnership name by authorized person. |
SKECHERS U.S.A., INC.
PROXY FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 30, 2008
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The undersigned stockholder(s) of Skechers U.S.A., Inc. a Delaware corporation,
hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement,
each dated April 30, 2008, and hereby appoints Michael Greenberg and David Weinberg and each of them,
with full power of substitution, as attorneys-in-fact and proxies for, and in the name and place of, the
undersigned, and hereby authorizes each of them to represent and to vote all of the shares which the undersigned
is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Skechers U.S.A., Inc. to be held at the Shade Hotel
located at 1221 North Valley, Manhattan Beach, California 90266, on Friday, May 30, 2008, at 10:00 a.m. Pacific time,
and at any adjournments thereof, upon the matters as set forth in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy
Statement, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged. Directions to the Annual Meeting may be found by going to the annual
meeting section of the investor relations page of our corporate
information website at www.skx.com.
THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED AND RETURNED IN A TIMELY MANNER, WILL BE VOTED AT THE
ANNUAL MEETING AND AT ANY ADJOURNMENTS THEREOF IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED
STOCKHOLDER(S). IF NO SPECIFICATION IS MADE, THE PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES
LISTED IN PROPOSAL 1, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE JUDGMENT OF THE PERSONS NAMED AS PROXIES HEREIN ON ANY OTHER
MATTERS THAT MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING.
PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE
ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
(continued, and to be signed and dated, on reverse side)