10-K
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2007
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period
from to .
|
Commission File
Number: 0-20322
Starbucks Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Washington
|
|
91-1325671
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
|
|
(IRS Employer
|
incorporation or
organization)
|
|
Identification
No.)
|
2401 Utah
Avenue South
Seattle, Washington 98134
(Address
of principal executive offices, zip code)
(Registrants
telephone number, including area code):
(206) 447-1575
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value Per Share
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the
past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation of S-K is not contained
herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the
registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and
large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one)
Large Accelerated Filer
þ Accelerated
Filer
o Non-Accelerated
Filer
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant as of the last business day of
the registrants most recently completed second fiscal
quarter, based upon the closing sale price of the
registrants common stock on March 30, 2007 as
reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market was
$22.7 billion.
As of November 16, 2007, there were approximately
730.4 million shares of the registrants Common Stock
outstanding.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement for the
registrants Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on
March 19, 2008 have been incorporated by reference into
Part III of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
STARBUCKS
CORPORATION
Form 10-K
For the
Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2007
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
General
Starbucks Corporation (together with its subsidiaries,
Starbucks or the Company) was formed in
1985. Starbucks purchases and roasts high-quality whole bean
coffees and sells them, along with fresh, rich-brewed coffees,
Italian-style espresso beverages, cold blended beverages, a
variety of complementary food items, coffee-related accessories
and equipment, a selection of premium teas and a line of compact
discs, primarily through Company-operated retail stores.
Starbucks also sells coffee and tea products and licenses its
trademark through other channels and, through certain of its
equity investees, Starbucks produces and sells ready-to-drink
beverages which include, among others, bottled
Frappuccino®
beverages and Starbucks
DoubleShot®
espresso drinks, and a line of superpremium ice creams. All
channels outside the Company-operated retail stores are
collectively known as Specialty Operations. The
Companys objective is to establish Starbucks as one of the
most recognized and respected brands in the world. To achieve
this goal, the Company plans to continue expansion of its retail
operations, to grow its Specialty Operations and to selectively
pursue other opportunities to leverage the Starbucks brand by
introducing new products and developing new channels of
distribution. The Companys brand portfolio includes
superpremium
Tazo®
teas, Starbucks Hear
Music®
compact discs, Seattles Best
Coffee®
and Torrefazione
Italia®
coffee.
Segment
Financial Information
Starbucks has three reportable operating segments: United
States, International and Global Consumer Products Group
(CPG). The United States and International segments
both include Company-operated retail stores and certain
components of Specialty Operations. Specialty Operations within
the United States include licensed retail stores, foodservice
accounts and other initiatives related to the Companys
core business. International specialty operations primarily
include retail store licensing operations in more than 30
countries and foodservice accounts in Canada and the United
Kingdom (UK). The CPG segment includes the
Companys grocery and warehouse club business as well as
branded products operations worldwide. Financial information
about Starbucks segments is included in Note 18 to the
consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
(Form 10-K
or Report).
Revenue
Components
The following table shows the Companys revenue components
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total
|
|
|
% of Specialty
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Net Revenues
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Company-operated retail
|
|
|
85
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail stores
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
Grocery and warehouse club
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
Branded products
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total licensing
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
73
|
%
|
Foodservice and other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foodservice
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
Other initiatives
|
|
|
<1
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total foodservice and other
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total specialty
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
Company-operated
Retail Stores
The Companys retail goal is to become the leading retailer
and brand of coffee in each of its target markets by selling the
finest quality coffee and related products and by providing each
customer a unique Starbucks Experience. The Starbucks
Experience, or third place after home and work, is built
upon superior customer service as well as clean and
well-maintained Company-operated retail stores that reflect the
personalities of the communities in which they operate, thereby
building a high degree of customer loyalty. Starbucks strategy
for expanding its retail business is to increase its market
share primarily by opening additional stores in existing markets
and opening stores in new markets where the opportunity exists
to become the leading specialty coffee retailer. In support of
this strategy, Starbucks opened 1,342 new Company-operated
stores during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007
(fiscal 2007). Starbucks Company-operated retail
stores, including 11 Seattles Best
Coffee®
stores and 4 Hear Music retail stores, accounted for 85% of
total net revenues during fiscal 2007.
The following table summarizes total Company-operated retail
store data for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Stores Opened During the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended(1)
|
|
|
Stores Open as of
|
|
|
|
Sept 30, 2007
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
|
Sept 30, 2007
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
1,065
|
|
|
|
810
|
|
|
|
6,793
|
|
|
|
5,728
|
|
International:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
China(2)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
Thailand
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Australia
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
Singapore
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
Other
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total International(2)
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
1,712
|
|
|
|
1,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company-operated
|
|
|
1,342
|
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
|
|
8,505
|
|
|
|
7,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Store openings are reported net of closures. |
|
(2) |
|
Store data has been adjusted for the acquisition of the Beijing
operations by reclassifying historical information from Licensed
stores to Company-operated stores. |
Starbucks retail stores are typically located in high-traffic,
high-visibility locations. Because the Company can vary the size
and format, its stores are located in or near a variety of
settings, including downtown and suburban retail centers, office
buildings and university campuses. While the Company selectively
locates stores in shopping malls, it focuses on locations that
provide convenient access for both pedestrians and drivers. With
the flexibility in store size and format, the Company also
locates retail stores in select rural and off-highway locations
to serve a broader array of customers outside major metropolitan
markets and further expand brand awareness. To provide a greater
degree of access and convenience for nonpedestrian customers,
the Company continues to expand development of Drive Thru retail
stores. At the end of fiscal 2007, the Company operated
approximately 2,300 Drive Thru locations, compared to
approximately 1,600 at the end of fiscal 2006.
All Starbucks stores offer a choice of regular and decaffeinated
coffee beverages, a broad selection of Italian-style espresso
beverages, cold blended beverages, iced shaken refreshment
beverages, a selection of teas and distinctively packaged
roasted whole bean coffees. Starbucks stores also offer a
selection of fresh pastries and other food items, sodas, juices,
bottled water, coffee-making equipment and accessories, a
selection of compact discs and seasonal novelty items. Each
Starbucks store varies its product mix depending upon the size
of the store and its location. Larger stores carry a broad
selection of the Companys whole bean coffees in various
sizes and types of packaging, as well as an assortment of coffee
and espresso-making equipment and accessories such as coffee
grinders, coffee filters, storage containers, travel tumblers
and mugs. Smaller Starbucks stores and kiosks typically sell a
full line of
2
coffee beverages, a limited selection of whole bean coffees and
a few accessories such as travel tumblers and logo mugs. A
selection of prepared sandwiches and salads were carried in
approximately 4,800 United States and 1,600 International
stores, at the end of fiscal 2007. Starbucks continues to expand
its food warming program in the United States, with over 3,000
stores as of September 30, 2007 providing warm food items,
primarily breakfast sandwiches.
The Companys retail sales mix by product type was as
follows for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sept 30, 2007
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
|
Oct 2, 2005
|
|
|
Beverages
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
|
|
77
|
%
|
|
|
77
|
%
|
Food
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
Coffee-making equipment and other merchandise
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Whole bean coffees
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty
Operations
Specialty Operations strive to develop the Companys brands
outside the Company-operated retail store environment through a
number of channels. Starbucks strategy is to reach customers
where they work, travel, shop and dine by establishing
relationships with prominent third parties that share the
Companys values and commitment to quality. These
relationships take various forms, including licensing
arrangements, foodservice accounts and other initiatives related
to the Companys core businesses. In certain situations,
Starbucks has an equity ownership interest in licensee
operations. During fiscal 2007, specialty revenues (which
include royalties and fees from licensees, as well as product
sales derived from Specialty Operations) accounted for 15% of
total net revenues.
Licensing
Retail stores
In its licensed retail store operations, the Company leverages
the expertise of its local partners and shares Starbucks
operating and store development experience. Licensee partners
provide improved and, at times, the only access to desirable
retail space. Most licensees are prominent retailers with
in-depth market knowledge and access. As part of these
arrangements, Starbucks receives license fees and royalties and
sells coffee, tea, compact discs and related products for resale
in licensed locations. Employees working in licensed retail
locations are required to follow Starbucks detailed store
operating procedures and attend training classes similar to
those given to employees in Company-operated stores.
During fiscal 2007, 723 Starbucks licensed retail stores were
opened in the United States and, as of September 30, 2007,
the Companys U.S. licensees operated 3,891 stores.
During fiscal 2007, 506 International licensed stores were
opened. At September 30, 2007, the Companys
International operating segment had a total of 2,615 licensed
retail stores. Product sales to and royalty and license fee
revenues from U.S. and International licensed retail stores
accounted for 47% of specialty revenues in fiscal 2007.
At fiscal year end 2007, Starbucks total licensed retail stores
by region and specific location were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
|
Europe/Middle East/Africa
|
|
|
Americas
|
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
Turkey
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
3,891
|
|
South Korea
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
Spain
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
234
|
|
China
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
Greece
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
Mexico
|
|
|
159
|
|
Taiwan
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
Saudi Arabia
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
26
|
|
Philippines
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
Kuwait
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
United Arab Emirates
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indonesia
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
France
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Zealand
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
Switzerland
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
Licensing
Grocery and warehouse club
The Company, through a licensing relationship with Kraft Foods,
Inc. (Kraft), sells a selection of Starbucks,
Seattles Best Coffee and Torrefazione Italia branded
packaged coffees and
Tazo®
teas in grocery and warehouse club stores throughout the United
States. Kraft manages all distribution, marketing, advertising
and promotion of these products.
The Company sells packaged coffee and tea internationally both
directly to warehouse club customers such as Costco and through
an expanded licensing relationship with Kraft. In February 2007,
the licensing relationship with Kraft was expanded globally and
now also includes distribution of packaged coffee in Canada and
the UK.
By the end of fiscal 2007, the Companys coffees and teas
were available in approximately 34,000 grocery and warehouse
club stores, with 30,000 in the United States and 4,000 in
International markets. Revenues from this category comprised 23%
of specialty revenues in fiscal 2007.
Licensing
Branded products
The Company licenses the rights to produce and market Starbucks
branded products through several partnerships both domestically
and internationally. The North American Coffee Partnership, a
joint venture with the Pepsi-Cola Company in which Starbucks is
a 50% equity investor, manufactures and markets ready-to-drink
beverages, including bottled
Frappuccino®
beverages and Starbucks
DoubleShot®
espresso drinks. Other partnerships produce and market branded
products in these categories: superpremium ice cream (joint
venture with Dreyers Grand Ice Cream, Inc.), premium
coffee liqueur (license agreement with Beam Global
Spirits & Wine) and chocolate (license agreement with
The Hershey Company). Internationally, the Company licenses
Starbucks
Discoveries®,
a ready-to-drink chilled cup coffee beverage, in Japan, Taiwan
and South Korea.
Collectively, the revenues from these branded products accounted
for 3% of specialty revenues in fiscal 2007.
Foodservice
The Company sells whole bean and ground coffees, including the
Starbucks, Seattles Best Coffee and Torrefazione Italia
brands, as well as a selection of premium
Tazo®
teas and other related products, to institutional foodservice
companies that service business & industry, education,
healthcare, office coffee distributors, hotels, restaurants,
airlines and other retailers. The majority of the Companys
direct distribution accounts are through national broadline
distribution networks with SYSCO Corporation and
U.S. Foodservicetm.
Starbucks foodservice sales, customer service and support
resources are aligned with those of SYSCO Corporation and
U.S. Foodservice. Starbucks and Seattles Best Coffee
are the only superpremium national-brand coffees actively
promoted by SYSCO Corporation.
The Companys total foodservice operations had
approximately 18,000 accounts, primarily in the U.S., at fiscal
year end 2007, compared to approximately 16,200 accounts at
fiscal year end 2006. Revenues from foodservice accounts
comprised 26% of total specialty revenues in fiscal 2007.
Other
Initiatives
Included in this category is the Companys entertainment
business, which encompasses multiple music, book, film and
technology based initiatives designed to appeal to new and
existing Starbucks customers. Among these initiatives are
strategic marketing and co-branding arrangements, such as the
Starbucks XM Café Channel 45 available to all XM Satellite
Radio subscribers and the availability of wireless broadband
Internet service in United States and Canadian Company-operated
retail stores. The entertainment business also includes the Hear
Music label, an innovative record label and partnership between
Starbucks Entertainment and Concord Music Group. In fiscal 2007,
Starbucks and
Apple®
announced an exclusive partnership that lets customers
wirelessly browse, preview, buy and download music from the
iTunes®
Wi-Fi Music Store onto their wireless devices while at
participating Starbucks locations.
The Company has a strategic agreement with Chase Bank USA, N.A.
and Visa to issue the Starbucks Card
Duettotm
Visa®
(the Duetto Card) in the United States, and a
similar arrangement with Royal Bank of Canada and Visa
4
Canada Association to issue the Duetto Card in Canada. The
Duetto Card combines the functionality of a credit card with the
convenience of a reloadable Starbucks Card. Through these
arrangements, Starbucks primarily receives commissions for each
activated customer account and payments based on credit card
usage.
Collectively, the operations of these other initiatives
accounted for 1% of specialty revenues in fiscal 2007.
Product
Supply
Starbucks is committed to selling only the finest whole bean
coffees and coffee beverages. To ensure compliance with its
rigorous coffee standards, Starbucks controls its coffee
purchasing, roasting and packaging, and the distribution of
coffee used in its operations. The Company purchases green
coffee beans from coffee-producing regions around the world and
custom roasts them to its exacting standards for its many blends
and single origin coffees.
The supply and price of coffee are subject to significant
volatility. Although most coffee trades in the commodity market,
high-altitude arabica coffee of the quality sought by the
Company tends to trade on a negotiated basis at a substantial
premium above commodity coffee prices, depending upon the supply
and demand at the time of purchase. Supply and price can be
affected by multiple factors in the producing countries,
including weather, political and economic conditions. In
addition, green coffee prices have been affected in the past,
and may be affected in the future, by the actions of certain
organizations and associations that have historically attempted
to influence prices of green coffee through agreements
establishing export quotas or by restricting coffee supplies.
The Company depends upon its relationships with coffee
producers, outside trading companies and exporters for its
supply of green coffee. Due to volatility in green coffee
commodity prices, the Company has predominantly used fixed-price
purchase commitments in order to secure an adequate supply of
quality green coffee, bring greater certainty to its cost of
sales in future periods, and promote sustainability by paying an
equitable price to coffee producers. As of September 30,
2007, the Company had $324 million in fixed-price purchase
commitments which, together with existing inventory, is expected
to provide an adequate supply of green coffee through fiscal
2008. The Company believes, based on relationships established
with its suppliers, the risk of non-delivery on such purchase
commitments is remote. During fiscal 2007, C coffee
commodity prices traded on the New York Board of Trade within a
price range of $1.00 to $1.35 per pound and prices were, on
average, approximately 10% higher than in fiscal 2006. In
September 2007, prices moved sharply higher as poor weather led
to decreased expectations for the next harvest in the
worlds largest arabica coffee producer, Brazil.
Based on its market experience, the Company believes that
fixed-price purchase commitments are less likely to be available
on favorable terms when commodity prices are high. If prices
were to continue to move higher during fiscal 2008, Starbucks
likely would increase the use of price-to-be-fixed purchase
contracts to meet its demand for coffee. These types of
contracts state the quality, quantity and delivery periods but
allow the price of green coffee over a market index to be
established after contract signing. The Company believes that,
through a combination of fixed-price and price-to-be-fixed
contracts it will be able to secure an adequate supply of
quality green coffee. However, an increased use of
price-to-be-fixed contracts instead of fixed-price contracts
would decrease the predictability of coffee costs in future
periods. By volume, approximately 20% of the Companys
coffee purchase agreements entered during fiscal 2007 were
price-to-be-fixed contracts.
During fiscal 2004, Starbucks established the Starbucks Coffee
Agronomy Company S.R.L., a wholly owned subsidiary located in
Costa Rica, to reinforce the Companys leadership role in
the coffee industry and to help ensure sustainability and future
supply of high-quality green coffees from Central America.
Staffed with agronomists and sustainability experts, this
first-of-its-kind Farmer Support Center is designed to
proactively respond to changes in coffee producing countries
that impact farmers and the supply of green coffee. During
fiscal 2007, the Company announced plans to conduct similar
activities in East Africa.
In addition to coffee, the Company also purchases significant
amounts of dairy products, particularly fluid milk, to support
the needs of its Company-operated retail stores. Dairy expense
for the U.S. segment represents approximately 75% of the
Companys total dairy expense; therefore significant
changes in U.S. dairy prices can have a material impact on
total dairy expense. The U.S. segments dairy costs,
which closely follow the monthly Class I fluid milk base
price as calculated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture,
can change significantly in the short term. The Companys
U.S. dairy costs rose materially in fiscal 2007 compared to
fiscal 2006 and costs accelerated in the
5
fourth quarter of fiscal 2007 and have remained high, adversely
affecting the U.S. segments and the Companys
profitability. In the United States, the Company purchases
substantially all of its fluid milk requirements from two dairy
suppliers. The Company believes, based on relationships
established with these suppliers, that the risk of non-delivery
of enough fluid milk to support its U.S. retail business is
remote.
The Company also purchases a broad range of paper and plastic
products, such as cups, lids, cutlery, napkins, straws, shopping
bags and corrugated paper boxes from several companies to
support the needs of its retail stores as well as its
manufacturing and distribution operations. The cost of these
materials is dependent in part upon commodity paper and plastic
resin costs, but the Company believes it mitigates the effect of
short-term raw material price fluctuations through strategic
relationships with key suppliers.
Products other than whole bean coffees and coffee beverages sold
in Starbucks retail stores are obtained through a number of
different channels. Beverage ingredients, other than coffee and
milk, including leaf teas and the Companys selection of
ready-to-drink beverages, are purchased from several specialty
manufacturers, usually under long-term supply contracts. Food
products, such as fresh pastries, breakfast sandwiches and lunch
items, are generally purchased from both regional and local
sources. Coffee-making equipment, such as drip and coffee press
coffeemakers, espresso machines and coffee grinders, are
generally purchased directly from their manufacturers.
Coffee-related accessories, including items bearing the
Companys logos and trademarks, are produced and
distributed through contracts with a number of different
suppliers.
Competition
The Companys primary competitors for coffee beverage sales
are quick-service restaurants and specialty coffee shops. In
almost all markets in which the Company does business, there are
numerous competitors in the specialty coffee beverage business,
and management expects this situation to continue. The Company
believes that its customers choose among retailers primarily on
the basis of product quality, service and convenience, and, to a
lesser extent, on price. Starbucks has recently experienced
significantly greater direct competition from large competitors
in the United States quick-service restaurant sector, some of
whom have substantially greater financial, marketing and
operating resources than the Company. Starbucks also faces
well-established competitors in many International markets and
increased competition in the U.S. ready-to-drink coffee
beverage market.
The Companys whole bean coffees compete directly against
specialty coffees sold through supermarkets, specialty retailers
and a growing number of specialty coffee stores. Both the
Companys whole bean coffees and its coffee beverages
compete indirectly against all other coffees on the market.
Starbucks Specialty Operations face significant competition from
established wholesale and mail order suppliers, some of whom
have greater financial and marketing resources than the Company.
Starbucks faces intense competition from both restaurants and
other specialty retailers for prime retail locations and
qualified personnel to operate both new and existing stores.
Patents,
Trademarks, Copyrights and Domain Names
The Company owns
and/or has
applied to register numerous trademarks and service marks in the
United States and in many additional countries throughout the
world. Rights to the trademarks and service marks in the
United States are generally held by a wholly owned
affiliate of the Company and are used by the Company under
license. Some of the Companys trademarks, including
Starbucks, the Starbucks logo, Frappuccino, Seattles Best
Coffee and Tazo are of material importance to the Company. The
duration of trademark registrations varies from country to
country. However, trademarks are generally valid and may be
renewed indefinitely as long as they are in use
and/or their
registrations are properly maintained.
The Company owns numerous copyrights for items such as product
packaging, promotional materials, in-store graphics and training
materials. The Company also holds patents on certain products,
systems and designs. In addition, the Company has registered and
maintains numerous Internet domain names, including
Starbucks.com and Starbucks.net.
6
Research
and Development
Starbucks research and development efforts are led by food
scientists, engineers, chemists and culinarians in the Research
and Development department. This team is responsible for the
technical development of food and beverage products and new
equipment. The Company spent approximately $7.0 million,
$6.5 million and $6.2 million during fiscal 2007, 2006
and 2005, respectively, on technical research and development
activities, in addition to customary product testing and product
and process improvements in all areas of its business.
Seasonality
and Quarterly Results
Starbucks business is subject to seasonal fluctuations,
including fluctuations resulting from the holiday season. The
Companys cash flows from operations are considerably
higher in the fiscal first quarter than the remainder of the
year. This is largely driven by cash received as Starbucks Cards
are purchased and loaded during the holiday season. Since
revenues from the Starbucks Card are recognized upon redemption
and not when purchased, seasonal fluctuations on the
consolidated statements of earnings are much less pronounced.
Quarterly results are affected by the timing of the opening of
new stores, and the Companys growth may conceal the impact
of other seasonal influences. For these reasons, results for any
quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results that may
be achieved for the full fiscal year.
Employees
The Company employed approximately 172,000 people worldwide
as of September 30, 2007. In the United States, Starbucks
employed approximately 144,000 people, with 136,000 in
Company-operated retail stores and the remainder in the
Companys administrative and regional offices, and store
development, roasting and warehousing operations. Approximately
28,000 employees were employed outside of the United
States, with 27,000 in Company-operated retail stores and the
remainder in the Companys regional support facilities and
roasting and warehousing operations. The number of the
Companys employees represented by unions is immaterial.
Starbucks believes its current relations with its employees are
good.
Available
Information
Starbucks
Form 10-K
reports, along with all other reports and amendments filed with
or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC), are publicly available free of charge on the
Investor Relations section of Starbucks website at
http://investor.starbucks.com or at www.sec.gov as soon as
reasonably practicable after these materials are filed with or
furnished to the SEC. The Companys corporate governance
policies, ethics code and Board of Directors committee
charters are also posted within this section of the website. The
information on the Companys website is not part of this or
any other report Starbucks files with, or furnishes to, the SEC.
Starbucks demonstrates its commitment to corporate social
responsibility (CSR) by conducting its business in
ways that produce social, environmental and economic benefits to
the communities in which Starbucks operates. The Company aligns
its principles for social responsibility with its overall
strategy and business operations. As a result, Starbucks
believes it delivers benefits to the Company and its
stakeholders employees, business partners,
customers, suppliers, shareholders, community members and
others while distinguishing Starbucks as a leader
within the coffee industry. Providing open communication and
transparency helps the Company be accountable to its
stakeholders. To support this goal, Starbucks publishes a CSR
Annual Report. Starbucks fiscal 2007 CSR Annual Report will be
available online at www.starbucks.com/csr beginning in May 2008.
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K
includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that
they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They
often include words such as believes,
expects, anticipates,
estimates, intends, plans,
seeks or words of similar meaning, or future or
conditional verbs, such as will, should,
could or may. A forward-looking
statement is neither a prediction nor a guarantee of future
events or circumstances, and those future events or
circumstances may not occur. Investors should not place undue
reliance on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as
of the date of this Report. Starbucks is under no obligation
7
to update or alter any forward-looking statements, whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise. These
forward-looking statements are all based on currently available
operating, financial and competitive information and are subject
to various risks and uncertainties. The Companys actual
future results and trends may differ materially depending on a
variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the risks and
uncertainties discussed below. The risks below are not the only
ones the Company faces. Additional risks and risks that
management currently considers immaterial may also have an
adverse effect on the Company.
|
|
|
Failing
to meet market expectations for Starbucks financial performance
could cause the market price of Starbucks stock to drop rapidly
and sharply.
|
Management believes the price of Starbucks stock reflects high
market expectations for the Companys future operating
results. Any failure to meet those expectations, particularly
for the growth rates for (i) comparable store sales
attributable to number of transactions, average value per
transaction, or both, (ii) net revenues,
(iii) earnings per share or (iv) net new store
openings could cause the market price of Starbucks stock to drop
rapidly and sharply.
|
|
|
Starbucks
is subject to a number of significant risks that might cause the
Companys actual results to vary materially from its
forecasts, targets, or projections, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
lower customer traffic or average value per transaction, which
negatively impacts comparable store sales, net revenues,
operating income and earnings per share, due to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the impact of initiatives by competitors and increased
competition generally;
|
|
|
|
lack of customer acceptance of price increases necessary to
cover costs or new products;
|
|
|
|
unfavorable general economic conditions in the markets in which
Starbucks operates, including, but not limited to, downturns in
the housing market, higher interest rates, higher unemployment
rates, lower disposable income due to higher energy or other
consumer costs, lower consumer confidence, and other events or
factors that adversely affect consumer spending;
|
|
|
|
declines in general consumer demand for specialty coffee
products; or
|
|
|
|
adverse impacts due to negative publicity regarding the
Companys business practices or the health effects of
consuming its products;
|
|
|
|
|
|
cost increases that are either wholly or partially beyond the
Companys control, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
commodity costs for commodities that cannot be effectively
hedged, such as fluid milk, and to a lesser extent, high quality
arabica coffee;
|
|
|
|
labor costs such as increased health care costs, general market
wage levels and workers compensation insurance costs;
|
|
|
|
construction costs associated with new store openings;
|
|
|
|
information technology costs and other logistical resources
necessary to maintain and support the global growth of the
Companys business; and
|
|
|
|
litigation against Starbucks, particularly class action
litigation;
|
|
|
|
|
|
delays in store openings for reasons beyond the Companys
control, or a lack of desirable real estate locations available
for lease at reasonable rates, either of which could keep the
Company from meeting annual store opening targets and, in turn,
negatively impact net revenues, operating income and earnings
per share;
|
|
|
|
any material interruption in the Companys supply chain
beyond its control, such as (i) material interruption of
roasted coffee supply due to the casualty loss of any of the
Companys roasting plants or the failures of third-party
suppliers, or (ii) interruptions in service by common
carriers that ship goods within the Companys distribution
channels; and
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
the impact on Starbucks business of factors such as labor
discord, war, terrorism (including incidents targeting
Starbucks), political instability in certain markets and natural
disasters.
|
|
|
|
Starbucks
is highly dependent on the financial performance of its United
States operating segment.
|
The Companys financial performance is highly dependent on
its United States operating segment, which comprised 78% of
consolidated total net revenues in fiscal 2007. Any substantial
or sustained decline in these operations, if not offset by
increased financial performance elsewhere, could materially
adversely affect the Companys business and financial
results.
|
|
|
Starbucks
faces intense competition in the specialty coffee
market.
|
A description of the general competitive conditions in which
Starbucks operates appears on page 6 under
Competition. In the United States, the continued
focus by one or more large competitors in the quick-service
restaurant sector on selling high-quality specialty coffee
beverages at a low cost could attract Starbucks customers and
adversely affect the Companys sales and results of
operations. Similarly, continued competition from
well-established competitors in international markets could
hinder growth and adversely affect the Companys sales and
results of operations in those markets. Increased competition
from large competitors with significant resources in the United
States ready-to-drink coffee beverage market could adversely
affect the profitability of the CPG segment and the
Companys results of operations.
|
|
|
The
Companys success depends substantially on the value of the
Starbucks brand.
|
Starbucks believes it has built an excellent reputation globally
for the quality of its products, for delivery of a consistently
positive consumer experience and for its corporate social
responsibility programs. The Starbucks brand has been highly
rated in several global brand value studies. Management believes
it must preserve and grow the value of the Starbucks brand to be
successful in the future, particularly outside of North America,
where the Starbucks brand is less well-known. Brand value is
based in part on consumer perceptions as to a variety of
subjective qualities. Even isolated business incidents that
erode consumer trust, particularly if the incidents receive
considerable publicity or result in litigation, can
significantly reduce brand value. Consumer demand for the
Companys products and its brand equity could diminish
significantly if Starbucks fails to preserve the quality of its
products, is perceived to act in an unethical or socially
irresponsible manner or fails to deliver a consistently positive
consumer experience in each of its markets.
|
|
|
Starbucks
is increasingly dependent on the success of its International
operating segment in order to achieve its growth
targets.
|
The Companys future growth will increasingly depend on the
growth and sustained profitability of its International
operating segment. Some or all of the Companys
International market business units (MBUs), which
Starbucks generally defines by the countries or regions in which
they operate, may not be successful in their operations or in
achieving expected growth, which ultimately requires achieving
consistent, stable net revenues and earnings. Some factors that
will be critical to the success of International MBUs are
different than those affecting the Companys
U.S. stores and licensees. Tastes naturally vary by region,
and consumers in new international markets into which Starbucks
and its licensees expand may not embrace Starbucks products to
the same extent as consumers in the Companys existing
markets. Occupancy costs and store operating expenses are also
sometimes higher internationally than in the United States due
to higher rents for prime store locations or costs of compliance
with country-specific regulatory requirements. Because many of
the Companys International operations are in an early
phase of development, operating expenses as a percentage of
related revenues are often higher compared to
U.S. operations. The Companys International
operations are also subject to additional inherent risks of
conducting business abroad, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
changes or uncertainties in economic, social and political
conditions in the Companys markets;
|
|
|
|
interpretation and application of laws and regulations;
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
restrictive actions of foreign or United States governmental
authorities affecting trade and foreign investment, including
protective measures such as export and customs duties and
tariffs and restrictions on the level of foreign ownership;
|
|
|
|
import or other business licensing requirements;
|
|
|
|
the enforceability of intellectual property and contract rights;
|
|
|
|
limitations on the repatriation of funds and foreign currency
exchange restrictions;
|
|
|
|
lower levels of consumer spending on a per capita basis
than in the United States;
|
|
|
|
difficulty in staffing, developing and managing foreign
operations, including ensuring the consistency of product
quality and service, due to distance, language and cultural
differences; and
|
|
|
|
local laws that make it more expensive and complex to negotiate
with, retain or terminate employees.
|
|
|
|
The
China market is important to the Companys long-term growth
prospects - doing business there and in other developing
countries can be challenging.
|
Starbucks expects the Peoples Republic of China to be its
largest market outside of the United States. The Companys
growing investments in its China operations will increase the
Companys exposure in this market. Any significant or
prolonged deterioration in
U.S.-China
relations might adversely affect the Companys China
business.
Many of the risks and uncertainties of doing business in China
are solely within the control of the Chinese government.
Chinas government regulates the business conducted by
Starbucks by restricting the scope of the Companys foreign
investments within China and the food and beverage, retail,
wholesale and distribution business conducted within China.
Although management believes it has structured the
Companys China operations to comply with local laws, there
are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and
application of laws and regulations and the enforceability of
intellectual property and contract rights in China. If
Chinas governmental authorities were ultimately to
conclude that Starbucks has not complied with one or more
existing or future laws or regulations, or if their
interpretations of those laws or regulations were to change over
time, the Companys affiliates could be subject to fines
and other financial penalties, prohibited from opening new
stores or forced to cease operations entirely. Moreover, any
inability of the Company to enforce its intellectual property
and contract rights in Chinas courts could adversely
affect the Companys business.
Additionally, Starbucks plans to continue entering selected
markets in other developing countries, and has recently entered
Russia as an important part of the projected growth of the
International operating segment. Some of those markets pose
legal and business challenges similar to the China market, such
as substantial uncertainty regarding the interpretation and
application of laws and regulations and the enforceability of
intellectual property and contract rights.
|
|
|
The
Companys earnings and business growth strategy depends in
large part on the success of its business partners and
suppliers, and the Companys reputation may be harmed by
actions taken by third parties that are outside of the
Companys control.
|
The Companys growth strategy, including its plans for new
stores, foodservice, branded products and other initiatives,
relies significantly on a variety of licensee and partnership
relationships, particularly in its International markets.
Licensees are often authorized to use the Starbucks logo and
provide Starbucks-branded beverages, food and other products
directly to customers. The Company provides training and support
to, and monitors the operations of, these business partners, but
the product quality and service they deliver to Starbucks
customers may be diminished by any number of factors beyond the
Companys control. Management believes customers expect the
same quality of products and service from the Companys
licensees as they do from Starbucks and the Company strives to
ensure customers have the same experience whether they visit a
Company-operated or licensed store. Any shortcoming of a
Starbucks business partner, particularly an issue affecting the
quality of the service experience or the safety of beverages or
food, may be attributed by customers to Starbucks, thus damaging
the Companys reputation and brand value and potentially
affecting the results of operations.
10
|
|
|
Effectively
managing the Companys rapid growth is
challenging.
|
The Companys long-term goal is to open approximately
20,000 Starbucks stores in the United States and at least 20,000
stores in International markets. Starbucks expects to double the
size of its business over the next four to five years and
achieve higher annual growth in net earnings than revenue.
Effectively managing growth on this scale is challenging,
particularly as Starbucks expands into new markets
internationally, where it must balance the need for flexibility
and a degree of autonomy for local management with consistency
with the Companys goals, philosophy and standards. Growth
on this scale makes it increasingly difficult to ensure a
consistent supply of high quality raw materials, to locate and
hire sufficient numbers of key employees to meet the
Companys growth targets, to maintain an effective system
of internal controls for a globally dispersed enterprise and to
train employees worldwide to deliver a consistently high quality
product and customer experience.
|
|
|
The
loss of key personnel or difficulties recruiting and retaining
qualified personnel could jeopardize the Companys ability
to meet its growth targets.
|
The Companys future growth depends substantially on the
contributions and abilities of key executives and other
employees. Starbucks future growth also depends substantially on
its ability to recruit and retain high quality employees to work
in and manage Starbucks stores. Starbucks must continue to
recruit, retain and motivate management and other employees
sufficient to maintain its current business and support its
projected growth. A loss of key employees or a significant
shortage of high quality store employees could jeopardize the
Companys ability to meet its growth targets.
|
|
|
Adverse
public or medical opinions about the health effects of consuming
the Companys products, as well as reports of incidents
involving food-borne illnesses or food tampering, whether or not
accurate, could harm its business.
|
Some Starbucks products contain caffeine, dairy products, sugar
and other active compounds, the health effects of which are the
subject of increasing public scrutiny, including the suggestion
that excessive consumption of caffeine, dairy products, sugar
and other active compounds can lead to a variety of adverse
health effects. There has also been greater public awareness
that sedentary lifestyles, combined with excessive consumption
of high-calorie foods, have led to a rapidly rising rate of
obesity. Particularly in the United States, there is increasing
consumer awareness of health risks, including obesity, due in
part to increasing publicity and attention from health
organizations, as well as increased consumer litigation based on
alleged adverse health impacts of consumption of various food
products. While Starbucks has a variety of beverage and food
items that are low in caffeine and calories, an unfavorable
report on the health effects of caffeine or other compounds
present in the Companys products, or negative publicity or
litigation arising from other health risks such as obesity,
could significantly reduce the demand for the Companys
beverages and food products.
Similarly, reports, whether true or not, of unclean water
supply, food-borne illnesses and food tampering have in the past
severely injured the reputations of companies in the food
processing, grocery and quick-service restaurant sectors and
could in the future affect the Company as well. Any report
linking Starbucks to the use of unclean water, food-borne
illnesses or food tampering could damage its brand value,
immediately and severely hurt sales of its beverages and food
products, and possibly lead to product liability claims. Clean
water is critical to the preparation of specialty coffee
beverages. The Companys ability to ensure a clean water
supply to its stores is limited, particularly in some
International locations. If customers become ill from food-borne
illnesses, the Company could also be forced to temporarily close
some stores. In addition, instances of food-borne illnesses or
food tampering, even those occurring solely at the restaurants
or stores of competitors, could, by resulting in negative
publicity about the foodservice industry, adversely affect
Starbucks sales on a regional or global basis. A decrease in
customer traffic as a result of these health concerns or
negative publicity, or as a result of a temporary closure of any
of the Companys stores, could materially harm the
Companys business and results of operations.
11
|
|
|
Significant
increases in the market price or decreases in availability of
high quality arabica coffee or fluid milk could harm the
Companys business and financial results.
|
A discussion of the sources and availability of coffee of the
quality sought by Starbucks and fluid milk appears on
page 5 under Product Supply. Any significant
increase in the market price or any significant decrease in the
availability of high-quality arabica coffee or fluid milk
could adversely affect the Companys business and financial
results.
|
|
|
A
regional or global health pandemic could severely affect
Starbucks business.
|
A health pandemic is a disease that spreads rapidly and widely
by infection and affects many individuals in an area or
population at the same time. If a regional or global health
pandemic were to occur, depending upon its duration and
severity, the Companys business could be severely
affected. Starbucks has positioned itself as a third place
between home and work where people can gather together for human
connection. Customers might avoid public gathering places in the
event of a health pandemic, and local, regional or national
governments might limit or ban public gatherings to halt or
delay the spread of disease. A regional or global health
pandemic might also adversely impact the Companys business
by disrupting or delaying production and delivery of materials
and products in its supply chain and by causing staffing
shortages in its stores. The impact of a health pandemic on
Starbucks might be disproportionately greater than on other
companies that depend less on the gathering of people together
for the sale, use or license of their products and services.
|
|
|
Starbucks
relies heavily on information technology in its operations, and
any material failure, inadequacy, interruption or security
failure of that technology could harm the Companys ability
to effectively operate its business.
|
Starbucks relies heavily on information technology systems
across its operations, including for management of its supply
chain, point-of-sale processing in its stores, and various other
processes and transactions. The Companys ability to
effectively manage its business and coordinate the production,
distribution and sale of its products depends significantly on
the reliability and capacity of these systems. The failure of
these systems to operate effectively, problems with
transitioning to upgraded or replacement systems, or a breach in
security of these systems could cause delays in product sales
and reduced efficiency of the Companys operations, and
significant capital investments could be required to remediate
the problem.
|
|
|
Failure
of the Companys internal control over financial reporting
could harm its business and financial results.
|
Starbucks management is responsible for establishing and
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting.
Internal control over financial reporting is a process to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting for external purposes in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. Internal control over financial reporting includes:
(i) maintaining reasonably detailed records that accurately
and fairly reflect the Companys transactions; and
(ii) providing reasonable assurance that the Company
(a) records transactions as necessary to prepare the
financial statements, (b) makes receipts and expenditures
in accordance with management authorizations, and (c) would
timely prevent or detect any unauthorized acquisition, use or
disposition of Company assets that could have a material effect
on the financial statements. Because of its inherent
limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not
intended to provide absolute assurance that the Company would
prevent or detect a misstatement of the Companys financial
statements or fraud. The Companys rapid growth and entry
into new, globally dispersed markets will place significant
additional pressure on the Companys system of internal
control over financial reporting. Any failure to maintain an
effective system of internal control over financial reporting
could limit the Companys ability to report its financial
results accurately and timely or to detect and prevent fraud. A
significant financial reporting failure could cause an immediate
loss of investor confidence in Starbucks and a sharp decline in
the market price of its common stock.
12
|
|
|
Increased
leverage may harm the Companys financial condition and
results of operations.
|
As of September 30, 2007, Starbucks had approximately
$5.0 billion in minimum future rental payments under
non-cancelable operating leases and $3.1 billion of total
liabilities on a consolidated basis. Included in total
liabilities are aggregate principal indebtedness of
$710 million under outstanding commercial paper and
$550 million under ten-year notes issued in an August 2007
underwritten registered public offering. The Company will incur
additional operating lease obligations, largely driven by new
store openings, and may incur additional indebtedness, subject
to the limitations contained in its financing agreements. The
recent increase in the Companys level of financial
obligations has had, and any future increase (which may or may
not occur) will have, several important effects on the
Companys future operations, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
additional cash requirements to support the payment of rents and
interest on outstanding indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
possible increased vulnerability to adverse changes in general
economic and industry conditions, as well as to competitive
pressure;
|
|
|
|
possible limitations on the Companys ability to obtain
additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures,
general corporate and other purposes; and
|
|
|
|
possible limitations on the Companys flexibility in
planning for, or reacting to, changes in its business and its
industry.
|
The Companys ability to satisfy its lease obligations and
make payments of principal and interest on its indebtedness
depends on its future performance, which will be subject to
general economic conditions, industry cycles and financial,
business and other factors affecting its consolidated
operations, many of which are beyond the Companys control.
If Starbucks is unable to generate sufficient cash flow from
operations in the future to satisfy its financial obligations,
it may be required, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
to seek additional financing in the debt or equity markets;
|
|
|
|
to refinance or restructure all or a portion of its indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
to sell selected assets; or
|
|
|
|
to reduce or delay planned capital or operating expenditures.
|
Such measures might not be sufficient to enable Starbucks to
satisfy its financial obligations. In addition, any such
financing, refinancing or sale of assets might not be available
on economically favorable terms.
The Companys existing strong cash flow and capital
structure mitigate the current risk associated with leverage.
Management expects future cash flows to be sufficient to meet
operating expenses, debt service costs, and capital expenditures
required to support projected new store openings and investments
in existing and new markets. In addition, management does not
expect to increase leverage to levels that would inhibit the
Companys access to capital markets in the event of
short-falls in anticipated operating cash flow.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
Not applicable.
13
The following table shows properties used by Starbucks in
connection with its roasting and distribution operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Size
|
|
|
Owned or
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
in Square Feet
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
Purpose
|
|
Kent, WA
|
|
|
332,000
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Roasting and distribution
|
Kent, WA
|
|
|
403,000
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
Warehouse
|
Renton, WA
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
Warehouse
|
York County, PA
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Roasting and distribution
|
York County, PA
|
|
|
298,000
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Warehouse
|
York County, PA
|
|
|
231,000
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
Warehouse
|
Carson Valley, NV
|
|
|
360,000
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Roasting and distribution
|
Portland, OR
|
|
|
86,000
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
Warehouse
|
Basildon, United Kingdom
|
|
|
142,000
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
Warehouse and distribution
|
Amsterdam, Netherlands
|
|
|
97,000
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
Roasting and distribution
|
The Company leases approximately 1.1 million square feet of
office space and owns a 204,000 square foot office building
in Seattle, Washington for corporate administrative purposes.
As of September 30, 2007, Starbucks had more than 8,500
Company-operated retail stores. The Company also leases space in
approximately 160 additional locations for regional, district
and other administrative offices, training facilities and
storage, not including certain seasonal retail storage
locations. The Company is constructing a new, owned,
150,000 square foot roasting and distribution plant in St.
Matthews, South Carolina. Operations are planned to begin in
early 2009.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
See discussion of Legal Proceedings in Note 17 to the
consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of
this Report.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during
the fiscal fourth quarter of 2007.
Executive
Officers of the Registrant
The executive officers of the Company are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Howard Schultz
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
chairman of the Board of Directors
|
James L. Donald
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
president, chief executive officer and director
|
Martin Coles
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
chief operating officer
|
Launi Skinner
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
president, Starbucks Coffee U.S.
|
James C. Alling
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
president, Starbucks Coffee International
|
Gerardo I. Lopez
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
senior vice president; president, Global Consumer Products and
Seattles Best Coffee
|
Peter J. Bocian
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
executive vice president, chief financial officer and chief
administrative officer
|
Paula E. Boggs
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
executive vice president, general counsel and secretary
|
Dorothy J. Kim
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
executive vice president, Supply Chain Operations
|
David A. Pace
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
executive vice president, Partner Resources
|
Howard Schultz is the founder of the Company and the
chairman of the board. From the Companys inception in 1985
to June 2000, he served as chairman of the board and chief
executive officer. From June 2000 to February 2005,
Mr. Schultz held the title of chief global strategist.
Mr. Schultz also serves on the board of directors of
DreamWorks Animation SKG, Inc.
14
James L. Donald joined Starbucks in October 2002 and has
been president and chief executive officer and a director of the
Company since April 2005. From October 2004 to April 2005,
Mr. Donald served as ceo designate. Prior to that,
Mr. Donald served as president, North America from the time
he joined the Company in October 2002. From October 1996 to
October 2002, Mr. Donald served as chairman, president and
ceo of Pathmark Stores, Inc. and prior to that time he held a
variety of senior management positions with Albertsons,
Inc., Safeway, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Martin Coles joined Starbucks in April 2004 as president,
Starbucks Coffee International and was promoted to chief
operating officer in September 2007. Prior to joining Starbucks,
Mr. Coles served as an executive vice president of Reebok
International, Ltd. from December 2001 to February 2004. Prior
to joining Reebok International, Mr. Coles held several
executive level management sales and operations positions with
NIKE Inc., Letsbuyit.com and Gateway, Inc.
Launi Skinner joined Starbucks in August 1993 and was
promoted to president, Starbucks Coffee U.S. in September
2007. Ms. Skinner previously served as the Companys
senior vice president, Store Development since October 2004.
From January 1999 to September 2004, she served as regional vice
president for retail operations in several different zones in
the western U.S. and Canada. Prior to becoming a regional
vice president, she served as a market director.
James C. Alling joined Starbucks in September 1997 as
senior vice president, Grocery and became president, Starbucks
Coffee International in September 2007. Mr. Alling served
as president, Starbucks Coffee U.S. from October 2004 to
September 2007, executive vice president, Business and
Operations United States from November 2003 to
October 2004 and held a number of positions as senior vice
president from September 1997 until November 2003.
Gerardo I. Lopez joined Starbucks in October 2004 as
senior vice president; president, Global Consumer Products and
became senior vice president; president, Global Consumer
Products and Seattles Best Coffee in November 2007. Prior
to joining Starbucks, Mr. Lopez was president of the
Handleman Entertainment Resources division of Handleman Company,
from November 2001 to September 2004 and as senior vice
president and general manager from May 2000 to November 2001.
Prior to that, Mr. Lopez held a variety of executive
management positions with Frito-Lay, Inc., Pepsi-Cola Company
and The Procter & Gamble Company.
Peter J. Bocian joined Starbucks as executive vice
president and chief financial officer designate in May 2007 and
became executive vice president, chief financial officer and
chief administrative officer in October 2007. Prior to joining
Starbucks, Mr. Bocian worked at NCR Corporation since 1983,
most recently as senior vice president and chief financial
officer since 2004. From 2003 to 2004, he served as NCRs
vice president, finance and interim chief financial officer.
From 2002 to 2003, Mr. Bocian was the chief financial
officer of NCRs Retail and Financial Group, covering four
business units and from 1999 to 2002, he served as the chief
financial officer of NCRs Retail Solutions Division.
Paula E. Boggs joined Starbucks in September 2002 as
executive vice president, general counsel and secretary. Prior
to joining Starbucks, Ms. Boggs served as vice president,
legal, for products, operations and information technology at
Dell Computer Corporation from 1997 to 2002. From 1995 to 1997,
Ms. Boggs was a partner with the law firm of Preston
Gates & Ellis. Ms. Boggs served in several roles
at the Pentagon, White House and U.S. Department of Justice
between 1984 and 1995.
Dorothy J. Kim joined Starbucks in November 1995 and was
promoted to executive vice president, Supply Chain Operations in
December 2004. From April 2003 to December 2004, Ms. Kim
was senior vice president, Global Logistics, Planning and
Procurement. From April 2002 to April 2003, Ms. Kim was
vice president, Supply Chain and Coffee Operations, Logistics,
and from October 2000 to April 2002, Ms. Kim was vice
president, Supply Chain and Coffee Operations, Finance and
Systems. Prior to becoming a vice president, Ms. Kim held
several positions in retail planning and operations.
David A. Pace joined Starbucks in July 2002 as executive
vice president of Partner Resources. Mr. Pace has notified
the Company that he intends to resign for personal reasons
effective December 31, 2007. From 2000 to 2002,
Mr. Pace was the president of i2 Technologies. From
1999 to 2000, Mr. Pace served as the chief human resources
officer for HomeGrocer.com. From 1995 to 1999, he served as
senior vice president of human resources for Tricon Restaurants
International (now YUM! Brands, Inc.).
There are no family relationships among any directors or
executive officers of the Company.
15
Item 5. Market
for the Registrants Common Equity, Related Shareholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
SHAREHOLDER
INFORMATION
Market
Information and Dividend Policy
The Companys common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global
Select Market (NASDAQ), under the symbol
SBUX. The following table shows the quarterly high
and low closing sale prices per share of the Companys
common stock as reported by NASDAQ for each quarter during the
last two fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
28.29
|
|
|
$
|
25.87
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
31.84
|
|
|
|
25.54
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
36.29
|
|
|
|
29.32
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
39.43
|
|
|
|
33.62
|
|
October 1, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
38.02
|
|
|
$
|
29.55
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
39.63
|
|
|
|
34.93
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
37.63
|
|
|
|
30.24
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
31.96
|
|
|
|
24.91
|
|
As of November 16, 2007, the Company had approximately
18,500 shareholders of record. Starbucks has never paid any
dividends on its common stock. The Company presently intends to
retain earnings for use in its business and to repurchase shares
of common stock and, therefore, does not anticipate paying a
cash dividend in the near future.
The following table provides information regarding repurchases
by the Company of its common stock during the 13-week period
ended September 30, 2007:
ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as
|
|
|
Shares that May
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
|
Yet be
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Announced
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Paid per
|
|
|
Plans or
|
|
|
Under the Plans
|
|
Period(1)
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Programs(2)
|
|
|
or Programs(2)
|
|
|
July 2, 2007 July 29, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,138,212
|
|
July 30, 2007 August 26, 2007
|
|
|
8,304,303
|
|
|
|
27.12
|
|
|
|
8,304,303
|
|
|
|
17,833,909
|
|
August 27, 2007 September 30, 2007
|
|
|
4,315,202
|
|
|
|
27.02
|
|
|
|
4,315,202
|
|
|
|
13,518,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
12,619,505
|
|
|
|
27.09
|
|
|
|
12,619,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Monthly information is presented by reference to the
Companys fiscal months during the fourth quarter of fiscal
2007. |
|
(2) |
|
The Companys share repurchase program is conducted under
authorizations made from time to time by the Companys
Board of Directors. The shares reported in the table are covered
by a Board authorization to repurchase 25 million shares of
common stock publicly announced on August 2, 2006, and a
Board authorization to repurchase 25 million shares of
common stock publicly announced on May 3, 2007. Neither of
these authorizations has an expiration date. |
16
Performance
Comparison Graph
The following graph depicts the Companys total return to
shareholders from September 29, 2002 through
September 30, 2007, relative to the performance of the
Standard & Poors 500 Index, the NASDAQ Composite
Index, and the Standard & Poors 500 Consumer
Discretionary Sector, a peer group that includes Starbucks. All
indices shown in the graph have been reset to a base of 100 as
of September 29, 2002, and assume an investment of $100 on
that date and the reinvestment of dividends paid since that
date. Starbucks has never paid a dividend on its common stock.
The stock price performance shown in the graph is not
necessarily indicative of future price performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/29/02
|
|
|
9/28/03
|
|
|
10/3/04
|
|
|
10/2/05
|
|
|
10/1/06
|
|
|
9/30/07
|
Starbucks Corporation
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
140.81
|
|
|
|
$
|
224.86
|
|
|
|
$
|
238.57
|
|
|
|
$
|
324.29
|
|
|
|
$
|
249.52
|
|
S&P 500
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
124.40
|
|
|
|
$
|
141.65
|
|
|
|
$
|
159.01
|
|
|
|
$
|
176.17
|
|
|
|
$
|
205.13
|
|
NASDAQ Composite
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
150.59
|
|
|
|
$
|
162.89
|
|
|
|
$
|
185.48
|
|
|
|
$
|
196.37
|
|
|
|
$
|
236.60
|
|
S&P Consumer Discretionary
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
122.65
|
|
|
|
$
|
140.01
|
|
|
|
$
|
147.07
|
|
|
|
$
|
160.09
|
|
|
|
$
|
170.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
In
millions, except earnings per share and store operating
data
The following selected financial data are derived from the
consolidated financial statements of the Company. The data below
should be read in conjunction with Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, Risk Factors, and the
Companys consolidated financial statements and notes. In
particular, see Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements included in Item 8 of this Report for a
description of accounting changes that materially affect the
comparability of the data presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
Oct 2,
|
|
|
Oct 3,
|
|
|
Sept 28,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
As of and for the Fiscal Year Ended(1)
|
|
(52 Wks)
|
|
|
(52 Wks)
|
|
|
(52 Wks)
|
|
|
(53 Wks)
|
|
|
(52 Wks)
|
|
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-operated retail
|
|
$
|
7,998
|
|
|
$
|
6,583
|
|
|
$
|
5,392
|
|
|
$
|
4,457
|
|
|
$
|
3,450
|
|
Specialty:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
1,026
|
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
Foodservice and other
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total specialty
|
|
|
1,413
|
|
|
|
1,204
|
|
|
|
977
|
|
|
|
837
|
|
|
|
626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
$
|
9,411
|
|
|
$
|
7,787
|
|
|
$
|
6,369
|
|
|
$
|
5,294
|
|
|
$
|
4,076
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
1,054
|
|
|
|
894
|
|
|
|
781
|
|
|
|
606
|
|
|
|
421
|
|
Earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change for FIN 47, net of
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
673
|
|
|
$
|
564
|
|
|
$
|
494
|
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
$
|
265
|
|
Earnings per common share before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle diluted
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
$
|
0.73
|
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.47
|
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change for FIN 47, net of
taxes per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per common share diluted
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.47
|
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
Cash dividends per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE SHEET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital (deficit)(2)
|
|
$
|
(459
|
)
|
|
$
|
(406
|
)
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
|
$
|
605
|
|
|
$
|
336
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
5,344
|
|
|
|
4,429
|
|
|
|
3,514
|
|
|
|
3,386
|
|
|
|
2,776
|
|
Short-term borrowings(3)
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (including current portion)(4)
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
2,284
|
|
|
$
|
2,229
|
|
|
$
|
2,090
|
|
|
$
|
2,470
|
|
|
$
|
2,069
|
|
STORE INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage change in comparable store sales(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Stores opened during the year:(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company operated stores
|
|
|
1,065
|
|
|
|
810
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
Licensed stores
|
|
|
723
|
|
|
|
733
|
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company operated stores
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
Licensed stores
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,571
|
|
|
|
2,199
|
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
|
|
1,344
|
|
|
|
1,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
Oct 2,
|
|
|
Oct 3,
|
|
|
Sept 28,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
As of and for the Fiscal Year Ended(1)
|
|
(52 Wks)
|
|
|
(52 Wks)
|
|
|
(52 Wks)
|
|
|
(53 Wks)
|
|
|
(52 Wks)
|
|
|
Stores open at year end:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-operated stores
|
|
|
6,793
|
|
|
|
5,728
|
|
|
|
4,918
|
|
|
|
4,338
|
|
|
|
3,817
|
|
Licensed stores
|
|
|
3,891
|
|
|
|
3,168
|
|
|
|
2,435
|
|
|
|
1,839
|
|
|
|
1,422
|
|
International(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-operated stores
|
|
|
1,712
|
|
|
|
1,435
|
|
|
|
1,202
|
|
|
|
1,031
|
|
|
|
873
|
|
Licensed stores
|
|
|
2,615
|
|
|
|
2,109
|
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
|
|
1,361
|
|
|
|
1,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
15,011
|
|
|
|
12,440
|
|
|
|
10,241
|
|
|
|
8,569
|
|
|
|
7,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Companys fiscal year ends on the Sunday closest to
September 30. |
|
(2) |
|
Working capital deficits were primarily due to increased current
liabilities from short term borrowings as of September 30,
2007 and October 1, 2006. See (3) below. |
|
(3) |
|
Commercial paper totaling $710 million was outstanding as
of September 30, 2007. Short term borrowings of
$700 million under the five-year revolving credit facility
were outstanding as of October 1, 2006. |
|
(4) |
|
In August 2007, the Company issued $550 million of
10-year
notes with a stated interest rate of 6.25%. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes only Starbucks Company-operated retail stores open
13 months or longer. Comparable store sales percentage for
fiscal 2004 excludes the extra sales week. |
|
(6) |
|
Store openings are reported net of closures. |
|
(7) |
|
International store information has been adjusted for the fiscal
2007 acquisition of Beijing licensed operations by reclassifying
historical information from Licensed stores to Company-operated
stores. |
19
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
General
Starbucks Corporations fiscal year ends on the Sunday
closest to September 30. Some fiscal years include
53 weeks. The fiscal years ended on September 30,
2007, October 1, 2006 and October 2, 2005, all
included 52 weeks. All references to store counts,
including data for new store openings, are reported net of
related store closures.
Management
Overview
Fiscal
2007 The Year in Review
Starbucks achieved solid performance in fiscal 2007
meeting its targets for store openings, revenue growth,
comparable store sales growth, and earnings per
share despite a challenging economic and operating
environment, and significant cost increases from dairy. The
Company completed the fiscal year with encouraging trends and
momentum in its International business but faced increasing
challenges in its U.S. business. While U.S. comparable
store sales were within the Companys stated target range,
it was accomplished through two price increases which offset
flat-to-negative transaction count trends in the
U.S. business. The pressure on traffic is consistent with
similar trends reported across both the retail and restaurant
industry. Management believes that the combination of the
economic slowdown and the price increases implemented in fiscal
2007 to help mitigate significant cost pressures have impacted
the frequency of customer visits to Starbucks stores.
Consolidated net revenues for fiscal year 2007 increased 21% to
$9.4 billion. Company-operated retail revenues in fiscal
2007 rose 21% to $8.0 billion, predominantly due to the
opening of 1,342 stores and comparable store sales growth of 5%.
The increase in comparable store sales was due to a 4% increase
in the average value per transaction and 1% growth in the number
of customer transactions. The Company opened a total of 2,571
new company-operated and licensed stores during the year, with
70% in the U.S. and 30% in International markets, to end
the year with over 15,000 stores.
For fiscal 2007, operating income increased to
$1.1 billion, while operating margin contracted
30 basis points to 11.2% of total net revenues. Margin
compression was due to higher costs of sales including occupancy
costs as a percentage of total net revenues due to a shift in
sales to higher cost products and higher distribution costs,
rent expense and dairy costs. These cost pressures were offset
in part by leveraging general and administrative expenses, store
operating expenses, and other operating expenses as a percentage
of total net revenues.
Net earnings rose to $673 million in fiscal 2007 from
$564 million for the previous year. Diluted earnings per
share for fiscal 2007 increased to $0.87 compared to $0.71 a
year ago. Excluding the cumulative effect of adopting
FIN 47 in the fiscal fourth quarter of 2006, earnings grew
16% and diluted earnings per share increased 19%.
Fiscal
2008 The View Ahead
Throughout fiscal 2007, Starbucks experienced a consistent
weakening in its U.S. business, exiting the year with a
negative trend in transactions. Management recognizes that it
faces a more challenging environment from an economic,
operational and competitive standpoint entering fiscal 2008. In
response to those challenges, management intends to focus in the
following key areas:
|
|
|
|
|
Better operational excellence at the store level;
|
|
|
|
More meaningful innovation to continue to differentiate the
store experience; and
|
|
|
|
Increased efficiencies and effectiveness in the general and
administrative infrastructure, to become more capable of
navigating through the fluctuations in the external environment.
|
20
In setting targets for fiscal 2008, managements goal was
to balance the long-term opportunity for store growth with the
near-term realities of the challenging economic and operating
environment. For fiscal 2008 the Company is targeting:
|
|
|
|
|
Opening approximately 2,500 new stores;
|
|
|
|
Comparable store sales growth in the range of 3% to 5%;
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue growth in the range of approximately 17% to
18%, to over $11 billion; and
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share in the range of $1.02 to $1.05, representing
17% to 21% growth, with earnings per share expansion expected to
be greater in the second half of fiscal 2008.
|
In summary, management believes these targets are balanced for
fiscal 2008. The Company intends to continue to build out stores
to take advantage of its global opportunity, to better execute
in its U.S. business, to grow and deliver significant
margin expansion in its International business, and to deliver
margin improvement for the Company on a consolidated basis.
Operating
Segment Overview
Starbucks has three reportable operating segments: United
States, International and CPG.
The United States and International segments both include
Company-operated retail stores, licensed retail stores and
foodservice operations. The United States segment has been
operating significantly longer than the International segment
and has developed deeper awareness of, and attachment to, the
Starbucks brand and stores among its customer base. As a result,
the United States segment has significantly more stores, and
higher total revenues than the International segment. Average
sales per store are also higher in the United States due to
various factors including length of time in market and local
income levels. Further, certain market costs, particularly
occupancy costs, are lower in the United States segment compared
to the average for the International segment, which comprises a
more diverse group of operations. As a result of the relative
strength of the brand in the United States segment, the number
of stores, the higher unit volumes, and the lower market costs,
the United States segment has a higher operating margin than the
less-developed International segment.
The Companys International store base continues to
increase rapidly and Starbucks is achieving a growing
contribution from established international markets while at the
same time investing in emerging markets, such as China, Brazil
and Russia. The Companys newer international markets
require a more extensive support organization, relative to the
current levels of revenue and operating income.
The CPG segment includes the Companys grocery and
warehouse club business as well as branded products operations
worldwide. The CPG segment operates primarily through joint
ventures and licensing arrangements with large consumer products
business partners, most significantly The North American Coffee
Partnership with the Pepsi-Cola Company for distribution of
ready-to-drink beverages, and with Kraft Foods Inc. for
distribution of packaged coffees and teas. This operating model
allows the CPG segment to leverage the business partners
existing infrastructures and to extend the Starbucks brand in an
efficient way. Most of the customer revenues from the
ready-to-drink and packaged coffee channels are recognized as
revenues by the joint venture or licensed business partner, not
by the CPG segment, and the proportionate share of the results
of the Companys joint ventures are included on a net basis
in Income from equity investees on the consolidated
statements of earnings. As a result, the CPG segment reflects
relatively lower revenues, a modest cost structure, and a
resulting higher operating margin, compared to the
Companys other two reporting segments, which consist
primarily of retail stores.
Expenses pertaining to corporate administrative functions that
support the operating segments but are not specifically
attributable to or managed by any segment are not included in
the reported financial results of the operating segments. These
unallocated corporate expenses include certain general and
administrative expenses, related depreciation and amortization
expenses and amounts included in Net interest and other
income on the consolidated statements of earnings.
21
Acquisitions
In the first quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company purchased a 90%
stake in its previously-licensed operations in Beijing, China.
Due to its majority ownership of these operations, Starbucks
applied the consolidation method of accounting subsequent to the
date of acquisition.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS FISCAL 2007 COMPARED TO FISCAL
2006
The following table presents the consolidated statement of
earnings as well as the percentage relationship to total net
revenues, unless otherwise indicated, of items included in the
Companys consolidated statements of earnings (amounts
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept 30,
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
Oct 2,
|
|
|
% of
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-operated retail
|
|
$
|
7,998,265
|
|
|
|
85.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,583,098
|
|
|
|
84.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,391,927
|
|
|
|
84.7
|
%
|
Specialty:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
1,026,338
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
860,676
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
673,015
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Foodservice and other
|
|
|
386,894
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
343,168
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
304,358
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total specialty
|
|
|
1,413,232
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
|
1,203,844
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
977,373
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
|
9,411,497
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
7,786,942
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
6,369,300
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Cost of sales including occupancy costs
|
|
|
3,999,124
|
|
|
|
42.5
|
|
|
|
3,178,791
|
|
|
|
40.8
|
|
|
|
2,605,212
|
|
|
|
40.9
|
|
Store operating expenses(1)
|
|
|
3,215,889
|
|
|
|
34.2
|
|
|
|
2,687,815
|
|
|
|
34.5
|
|
|
|
2,165,911
|
|
|
|
34.0
|
|
Other operating expenses(2)
|
|
|
294,136
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
253,724
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
192,525
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expenses
|
|
|
467,160
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
387,211
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
340,169
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
489,249
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
479,386
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
361,613
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
8,465,558
|
|
|
|
89.9
|
|
|
|
6,986,927
|
|
|
|
89.7
|
|
|
|
5,665,430
|
|
|
|
88.9
|
|
Income from equity investees
|
|
|
108,006
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
93,937
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
76,648
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
1,053,945
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
893,952
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
780,518
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
Net interest and other income
|
|
|
2,419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,291
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
15,829
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
1,056,364
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
906,243
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
796,347
|
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
383,726
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
324,770
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
301,977
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle
|
|
|
672,638
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
581,473
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
494,370
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change for FIN 47, net of
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,214
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
672,638
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
564,259
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
494,370
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As a percentage of related Company-operated retail revenues,
store operating expenses were 40.2%, 40.8% and 40.2% for the
fiscal years ended September 30, 2007, October 1, 2006
and October 2, 2005, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
As a percentage of related total specialty revenues, other
operating expenses were 20.8%, 21.1% and 19.7% for the fiscal
years ended September 30, 2007, October 1, 2006 and
October 2, 2005, respectively. |
22
Consolidated
Results of Operations
Net revenues for the fiscal year ended 2007, increased 21% to
$9.4 billion from $7.8 billion for fiscal 2006, driven
by increases in both Company-operated retail revenues and
specialty operations.
During the fiscal year ended 2007, Starbucks derived 85% of
total net revenues from its Company-operated retail stores.
Company-operated retail revenues increased 21% to
$8.0 billion for the fiscal year ended 2007, from
$6.6 billion for fiscal 2006. The increase was primarily
attributable to the opening of 1,342 new Company-operated retail
stores in the last 12 months and comparable store sales
growth of 5% for the fiscal year ended 2007. The increase in
comparable store sales was due to a 4% increase in the average
value per transaction and a 1% increase in the number of
customer transactions.
The Company derived the remaining 15% of total net revenues from
channels outside the Company-operated retail stores,
collectively known as specialty operations. Specialty revenues,
which include licensing revenues and foodservice and other
revenues, increased 17% to $1.4 billion for the fiscal year
ended 2007, from $1.2 billion for fiscal 2006.
Licensing revenues, which are derived from retail store
licensing arrangements as well as grocery, warehouse club and
certain other branded-product operations, increased 19% to
$1.0 billion for the fiscal year ended 2007, from
$861 million for fiscal 2006. The increase was primarily
due to higher product sales and royalty revenues from the
opening of 1,229 new licensed retail stores in the last
12 months and a 20% increase in licensing revenues from the
Companys CPG business.
Foodservice and other revenues increased 13% to
$387 million for the fiscal year ended 2007, from
$343 million for fiscal 2006. The increase was primarily
attributable to growth in new and existing accounts in the
U.S. foodservice business.
Cost of sales including occupancy costs increased to 42.5% of
total net revenues for the fiscal year ended 2007, compared to
40.8% for fiscal 2006. The increase was primarily due to a shift
in sales mix to higher cost products, the rise in distribution
costs, higher rent expense and higher dairy costs. Dairy expense
for the U.S. segment represents approximately 75% of the
total Companys dairy expense. For the U.S. segment
the average dairy costs per gallon rose 10% in fiscal 2007
compared to fiscal 2006, resulting in approximately
$20 million of additional expense.
Store operating expenses as a percentage of Company-operated
retail revenues decreased to 40.2% for the fiscal year ended
2007, from 40.8% for fiscal 2006, primarily due to higher
provisions for incentive compensation in the prior year due to
exceptionally strong performance as well as leverage on regional
overhead costs in fiscal 2007.
Other operating expenses (expenses associated with the
Companys Specialty Operations) decreased to 20.8% of total
specialty revenues for the fiscal year ended 2007, compared to
21.1% in fiscal 2006. The decline resulted primarily from
controlled discretionary spending in fiscal 2007.
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased to
$467 million for the fiscal year ended 2007, compared to
$387 million for the corresponding period of fiscal 2006.
The increase was primarily due to the opening of 1,342 new
Company-operated retail stores in the last 12 months. As a
percentage of total net revenues, depreciation and amortization
expenses decreased to 4.9% for the fiscal 2007, compared to 5.0%
for fiscal 2006.
General and administrative expenses increased to
$489 million for the fiscal year ended 2007, compared to
$479 million for fiscal 2006. The increase was primarily
due to higher payroll-related expenditures in support of
continued global growth, offset in part by unusually high
charitable contributions in fiscal 2006. As a percentage of
total net revenues, general and administrative expenses
decreased to 5.2% for the fiscal year ended 2007, from 6.1% for
fiscal 2006.
Income from equity investees increased 15% to $108 million
for the fiscal year ended 2007, compared to $94 million for
fiscal 2006, primarily due to higher equity income from
international investees.
Operating income increased 18% to $1.1 billion for the
fiscal year ended 2007, compared to $894 million for fiscal
2006. Operating margin decreased to 11.2% of total net revenues
for the fiscal year ended 2007, from 11.5% for fiscal 2006.
Margin compression was due to higher costs of sales and
occupancy costs as a percentage of total net revenues due to a
shift in sales to higher cost products and higher distribution
costs, rent expense and dairy costs.
23
These cost pressures were offset in part by leveraging general
and administrative expenses, store operating expenses, and other
operating expenses as a percentage of total net revenues.
Net interest and other income was $2 million for the fiscal
year ended 2007, compared to $12 million for fiscal 2006.
The decrease was primarily due to increased interest expense
resulting from a higher level of borrowings outstanding, which
include the $550 million of senior notes issued in August
2007, offset in part by a higher amount of income recognized on
unredeemed stored value card and gift certificate balances in
fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006.
Income taxes for the fiscal year ended 2007 resulted in an
effective tax rate of 36.3%, compared to 35.8% for fiscal 2006.
The effective tax rate for fiscal 2008 is expected to be
approximately in line with fiscal 2007, with quarterly
variations.
Net earnings for the fiscal year ended 2007, increased 19% to
$673 million from $564 million for fiscal 2006.
Diluted earnings per share increased to $0.87 for the fiscal
year ended 2007, compared to $0.71 per share for fiscal 2006.
Excluding the cumulative effect of adopting FIN 47 in
fourth quarter 2006, earnings before cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle grew 16% and diluted earnings per share
increased 19%.
Operating
Segments
Segment information is prepared on the same basis that the
Companys management reviews financial information for
operational decision-making purposes. Starbucks has three
reportable operating segments: United States, International and
CPG. Unallocated Corporate includes expenses
pertaining to corporate administrative functions that support
the operating segments but are not specifically attributable to
or managed by any segment and are not included in the reported
financial results of the operating segments. Operating income
represents earnings before Net interest and other
income and Income taxes. The following tables
summarize the Companys results of operations by segment
for fiscal 2007 and 2006 (in thousands):
United
States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended
|
|
|
|
Sept 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Sept 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of U.S. total net revenues
|
|
|
Net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-operated retail
|
|
$
|
6,560,864
|
|
|
$
|
5,495,240
|
|
|
|
19.4
|
%
|
|
|
89.3
|
%
|
|
|
88.9
|
%
|
Specialty:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
439,161
|
|
|
|
369,155
|
|
|
|
19.0
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
Foodservice and other
|
|
|
348,968
|
|
|
|
314,162
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total specialty
|
|
|
788,129
|
|
|
|
683,317
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
|
7,348,993
|
|
|
|
6,178,557
|
|
|
|
18.9
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Cost of sales including occupancy costs
|
|
|
2,956,231
|
|
|
|
2,374,485
|
|
|
|
24.5
|
|
|
|
40.2
|
|
|
|
38.4
|
|
Store operating expenses(1)
|
|
|
2,684,196
|
|
|
|
2,280,044
|
|
|
|
17.7
|
|
|
|
36.5
|
|
|
|
36.9
|
|
Other operating expenses(2)
|
|
|
204,672
|
|
|
|
190,624
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expenses
|
|
|
348,199
|
|
|
|
284,625
|
|
|
|
22.3
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
85,948
|
|
|
|
93,754
|
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
6,279,246
|
|
|
|
5,223,532
|
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
|
|
85.4
|
|
|
|
84.5
|
|
Income from equity investees
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
1,070,515
|
|
|
$
|
955,176
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
%
|
|
|
14.6
|
%
|
|
|
15.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As a percentage of related Company-operated retail revenues,
store operating expenses were 40.9% and 41.5% for the fiscal
years ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006,
respectively. |
24
|
|
|
(2) |
|
As a percentage of related total specialty revenues, other
operating expenses were 26.0% and 27.9% for the fiscal years
ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006,
respectively. |
The United States operating segment (United States)
sells coffee and other beverages, complementary food, whole bean
coffees, and coffee brewing equipment and merchandise primarily
through Company-operated retail stores. Specialty operations
within the United States include licensed retail stores,
foodservice accounts and other initiatives related to the
Companys core business.
United States total net revenues increased 19% to
$7.3 billion for the fiscal year ended 2007, compared to
$6.2 billion for fiscal 2006.
United States Company-operated retail revenues increased 19% to
$6.6 billion for the fiscal year ended 2007, compared to
$5.5 billion for fiscal 2006, primarily due to the opening
of 1,065 new Company-operated retail stores in the last
12 months and comparable store sales growth of 4% for
fiscal 2007, nearly all resulting from an increase in the
average value per transaction. The U.S. Company-operated
retail business experienced deteriorating trends in transactions
late in the year, driven by, management believes, the
U.S. economic slowdown combined with two price increases in
U.S. retail stores implemented in fiscal 2007. Management
believes that several initiatives underway in the
U.S. business, namely an enhanced focus on operational
excellence in the stores, a more robust marketing strategy,
meaningful product innovation and a renewed focus on the core
beverage and coffeehouse experience, will help address those
challenges in the U.S. retail business. In addition, in
fiscal 2008 the Company plans to slightly reduce the pace of new
store openings in the U.S. from the previous year in order
to ensure the selection of store location and store format are
the best fit for its customers and the business.
Total United States specialty revenues increased 15% to
$788 million for the fiscal year ended 2007, compared to
$683 million in fiscal 2006. United States licensing
revenues increased 19% to $439 million, compared to
$369 million for fiscal 2006 primarily due to higher
product sales and royalty revenues as a result of opening 723
new licensed retail stores in the last 12 months. United
States foodservice and other revenues increased 11% to
$349 million, from $314 million in fiscal 2006,
primarily due to growth in new and existing foodservice accounts.
United States operating income increased 12% to
$1.1 billion for the fiscal year ended 2007, compared to
$955 million for fiscal 2006. Operating margin decreased to
14.6% of related revenues from 15.5% in fiscal 2006. The
decrease was due to higher cost of sales including occupancy
costs, primarily due to a shift in sales mix to higher cost
products such as food and merchandise, higher distribution
costs, higher rent expense and higher dairy costs. Partially
offsetting these were lower store operating expenses, lower
general and administrative expenses, and lower other operating
expenses as a percentage of total net revenues. The decline in
store operating expenses as a percentage of total net revenues
was primarily due to higher provisions for incentive
compensation in the prior year as well as leverage on regional
overhead costs in fiscal 2007. General and administrative
expenses were lower primarily due to decreased salary and
related benefits expense as well as lower professional fees. The
decline in other operating expenses as a percentage of total net
revenues was primarily due to controlled discretionary spending
in the current year.
25
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended
|
|
|
|
Sept 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Sept 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of international total net revenues
|
|
|
Net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-operated retail
|
|
$
|
1,437,401
|
|
|
$
|
1,087,858
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
%
|
|
|
84.7
|
%
|
|
|
83.5
|
%
|
Specialty:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
220,832
|
|
|
|
186,050
|
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
Foodservice and other
|
|
|
37,926
|
|
|
|
29,006
|
|
|
|
30.8
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total specialty
|
|
|
258,758
|
|
|
|
215,056
|
|
|
|
20.3
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
|
1,696,159
|
|
|
|
1,302,914
|
|
|
|
30.2
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Cost of sales including occupancy costs
|
|
|
824,594
|
|
|
|
625,008
|
|
|
|
31.9
|
|
|
|
48.6
|
|
|
|
48.0
|
|
Store operating expenses(1)
|
|
|
531,693
|
|
|
|
407,771
|
|
|
|
30.4
|
|
|
|
31.4
|
|
|
|
31.3
|
|
Other operating expenses(2)
|
|
|
69,881
|
|
|
|
50,900
|
|
|
|
37.3
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expenses
|
|
|
84,165
|
|
|
|
66,800
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
93,806
|
|
|
|
78,337
|
|
|
|
19.7
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
1,604,139
|
|
|
|
1,228,816
|
|
|
|
30.5
|
|
|
|
94.6
|
|
|
|
94.3
|
|
Income from equity investees
|
|
|
45,723
|
|
|
|
34,370
|
|
|
|
33.0
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
137,743
|
|
|
$
|
108,468
|
|
|
|
27.0
|
%
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As a percentage of related Company-operated retail revenues,
store operating expenses were 37.0% and 37.5% for the fiscal
years ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006,
respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
As a percentage of related total specialty revenues, other
operating expenses were 27.0% and 23.7% for the fiscal years
ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006,
respectively. |
The International operating segment (International)
sells coffee and other beverages, complementary food, whole bean
coffees, and coffee brewing equipment and merchandise through
Company-operated retail stores in Canada, the UK and eight other
markets. Specialty operations in International primarily include
retail store licensing operations in more than 30 other
countries and foodservice accounts, primarily in Canada and the
UK. The Companys International store base continues to
increase rapidly and Starbucks is achieving a growing
contribution from established areas of the business while at the
same time investing in emerging markets and channels. Many of
the Companys International operations are in early stages
of development that require a more extensive support
organization, relative to the current levels of revenue and
operating income, than in the United States. This continuing
investment is part of the Companys long-term, balanced
plan for profitable growth.
International total net revenues increased 30% to
$1.7 billion for the fiscal year ended 2007, compared to
$1.3 billion for fiscal 2006.
International Company-operated retail revenues increased 32% to
$1.4 billion for the fiscal year ended 2007, compared to
$1.1 billion for fiscal 2006. The increase was primarily
due to the opening of 277 new Company-operated retail stores in
the last 12 months, comparable store sales growth of 7% for
fiscal 2007 and favorable foreign currency exchange for the
British pound sterling. The increase in comparable store sales
resulted from a 5% increase in the number of customer
transactions coupled with a 2% increase in the average value per
transaction.
Total International specialty revenues increased 20% to
$259 million for the fiscal year ended 2007, compared to
$215 million in fiscal 2006. The increase was primarily due
to higher product sales and royalty revenues from opening 506
new licensed retail stores in the last 12 months.
26
International operating income increased 27% to
$138 million for the fiscal year ended 2007, compared to
$108 million in fiscal 2006. Operating margin decreased to
8.1% of related revenues from 8.3% in fiscal 2006, primarily due
to higher cost of sales including occupancy costs due in part to
a shift in sales mix to higher cost products such as food and
merchandise and higher distribution costs. Partially offsetting
this increase was lower general and administrative expenses as a
percentage of total net revenues.
Global
Consumer Products Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended
|
|
|
|
Sept 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Sept 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of CPG total net revenues
|
|
|
Net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
$
|
366,345
|
|
|
$
|
305,471
|
|
|
|
19.9
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total specialty
|
|
|
366,345
|
|
|
|
305,471
|
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
218,299
|
|
|
|
179,298
|
|
|
|
21.8
|
|
|
|
59.6
|
|
|
|
58.7
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
19,583
|
|
|
|
12,200
|
|
|
|
60.5
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expenses
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
(29.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
6,349
|
|
|
|
6,363
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
244,307
|
|
|
|
197,969
|
|
|
|
23.4
|
|
|
|
66.7
|
|
|
|
64.8
|
|
Income from equity investees
|
|
|
61,515
|
|
|
|
59,416
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
19.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
183,553
|
|
|
$
|
166,918
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
50.1
|
%
|
|
|
54.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The CPG operating segment sells a selection of whole bean and
ground coffees and premium
Tazo®
teas through licensing arrangements in United States and
international markets. CPG also produces and sells
ready-to-drink beverages through its joint ventures and
marketing and distribution agreements. CPG General and
administrative expenses, previously included in
Other operating expenses, are now presented
separately.
CPG total net revenues increased 20% to $366 million for
the fiscal year ended 2007, compared to $305 million for
fiscal 2006. The increase was primarily due to increased sales
of U.S. packaged coffee and tea as well as increased
product sales and royalties in the international ready-to-drink
business.
CPG operating income increased by 10% to $184 million for
the fiscal year ended 2007, compared to $167 million in
fiscal 2006. Operating margin decreased to 50.1% of related
revenues, from 54.6% in fiscal 2006. Contraction of operating
margin was primarily due to slower growth in income from the
North American Coffee Partnership, an equity investee, which
produces ready-to-drink beverages.
Unallocated
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended
|
|
|
|
Sept 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Sept 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of total net revenues
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expenses
|
|
$
|
34,720
|
|
|
$
|
35,678
|
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
303,146
|
|
|
|
300,932
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
$
|
(337,866
|
)
|
|
$
|
(336,610
|
)
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated corporate expenses pertain to corporate
administrative functions that support but are not specifically
attributable to the Companys operating segments.
27
Total unallocated corporate expenses remained relatively flat at
$338 million for the fiscal year ended 2007, compared to
$337 million in fiscal 2006. Unallocated corporate expenses
as a percentage of total net revenues decreased to 3.6% for the
fiscal year ended 2007, from 4.3% for fiscal 2006, primarily as
a result of leveraging of the Companys scale and
infrastructure against global growth.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS FISCAL 2006 COMPARED TO FISCAL
2005
Consolidated
Results of Operations
Net revenues for the fiscal year ended 2006 increased 22% to
$7.8 billion from $6.4 billion for fiscal 2005, driven
by increases in both Company-operated retail revenues and
specialty operations.
During the fiscal year ended 2006, Starbucks derived 85% of
total net revenues from its Company-operated retail stores.
Company-operated retail revenues increased 22% to
$6.6 billion for the fiscal year ended 2006, from
$5.4 billion for fiscal 2005. This increase was primarily
due to the opening of 1,043 new Company-operated retail stores
in the last 12 months and comparable store sales growth of
7% in fiscal 2006. The increase in comparable store sales was
due to a 5% increase in the number of customer transactions and
a 2% increase in the average value per transaction.
The Company derived the remaining 15% of total net revenues from
channels outside the Company-operated retail stores. Specialty
revenues, which include licensing revenues and foodservice and
other revenues, increased 23% to $1.2 billion for the
fiscal year ended 2006, from $977 million for fiscal 2005.
Licensing revenues, which are derived from retail store
licensing arrangements, as well as grocery, warehouse club and
certain other branded product operations, increased 28% to
$861 million for fiscal 2006, from $673 million for
fiscal 2005. The increase is primarily due to higher product
sales and royalty revenues from the opening of 1,156 new
licensed retail stores in the last 12 months and, to a
lesser extent, growth in the licensed grocery and warehouse club
business.
Foodservice and other revenues increased 13% to
$343 million for fiscal 2006, from $304 million for
fiscal 2005. Foodservice and other revenues increased primarily
due to growth in new and existing U.S. foodservice accounts.
Cost of sales including occupancy costs decreased slightly to
40.8% of total net revenues for fiscal 2006, from 40.9% in
fiscal 2005. The decrease was primarily due to fixed rent costs
in fiscal 2006 being distributed over an expanded revenue base,
as well as increased occupancy costs in fiscal 2005 resulting
from intensified store maintenance activities. These favorable
items, combined with lower dairy costs, offset higher green
coffee costs for fiscal 2006.
Store operating expenses as a percentage of Company-operated
retail revenues increased to 40.8% for fiscal 2006 from 40.2%
for fiscal 2005. The increase was due to the recognition of
stock-based compensation expense and to higher provisions for
incentive compensation. The Company adopted the fair value
recognition provisions of new accounting requirements to expense
stock-based compensation at the beginning of its fiscal first
quarter of 2006. Under the transition provisions allowed, it
adopted the new requirements on a prospective basis and the
financial statements for fiscal 2005 and prior years do not
include stock-based compensation expense.
Other operating expenses, which are expenses associated with the
Companys Specialty Operations, increased to 21.1% of
specialty revenues in fiscal 2006, compared to 19.7% in fiscal
2005. The increase was primarily due to the recognition of
stock-based compensation expense as well as higher
payroll-related expenditures to support the expanding licensed
store operations, both in the U.S. and in existing and new
international markets.
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased to
$387 million in fiscal 2006, from $340 million in
fiscal 2005. The increase of $47 million was due to the
opening of 1,043 new Company-operated retail stores in the last
12 months. As a percentage of total net revenues,
depreciation and amortization decreased to 5.0% for fiscal 2006,
from 5.3% for fiscal 2005.
General and administrative expenses increased to
$479 million in fiscal 2006, compared to $362 million
in fiscal 2005. The increase was due to higher payroll-related
expenditures from the recognition of stock-based compensation
expense, additional employees to support continued global
growth, and higher professional fees in support of global
systems infrastructure development. As a percentage of total net
revenues, general and administrative expenses increased to 6.1%
for fiscal 2006, from 5.7% for fiscal 2005.
28
Income from equity investees increased to $94 million in
fiscal 2006, compared to $77 million in fiscal 2005. The
increase was primarily due to favorable volume-driven operating
results for The North American Coffee Partnership, which
produces ready-to-drink beverages which include, among others,
bottled
Frappuccino®
coffee drinks and Starbucks
DoubleShot®
espresso drinks, as well as improved operating results from
international investees, including Korea and Japan, mainly as a
result of new store openings.
Operating income increased 15% to $894 million in fiscal
2006, from $781 million in fiscal 2005. The operating
margin decreased to 11.5% of total net revenues in fiscal 2006,
compared to 12.3% in fiscal 2005, due to the recognition of
stock-based compensation expense.
Net interest and other income, which primarily consists of
interest income, decreased to $12 million in fiscal 2006,
from $16 million in fiscal 2005. The decrease was primarily
due to higher interest expense on the Companys revolving
credit facility, as well as lower interest income earned due to
lower average investment balances, offset in part by the
recognition of $4.4 million of income on unredeemed stored
value card balances in fiscal 2006. There was no income
recognized on unredeemed stored value card balances in fiscal
2005.
Income taxes for fiscal 2006 resulted in an effective tax rate
of 35.8%, compared to 37.9% in fiscal 2005. The decline in the
effective tax rate was due to the reversal of a valuation
allowance in fiscal 2006 that had been established in fiscal
2005, the settlement in the third quarter of fiscal 2006 of a
multi-year income tax audit in a foreign jurisdiction for which
the Company had established a contingent liability, and to
increased effectiveness of the Companys long-term tax
planning strategies.
Operating
Segments
Segment information is prepared on the same basis that the
Companys management reviews financial information for
operational decision-making purposes. Operating income
represents earnings before Net interest and other
income and Income taxes. The following tables
summarize the Companys results of operations by segment
for fiscal 2006 and 2005 (in thousands):
United
States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended
|
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
Oct 2,
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
Oct 2,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of U.S. total net revenues
|
|
|
Net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-operated retail
|
|
$
|
5,495,240
|
|
|
$
|
4,539,455
|
|
|
|
21.1
|
%
|
|
|
88.9
|
%
|
|
|
89.1
|
%
|
Specialty:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
369,155
|
|
|
|
277,987
|
|
|
|
32.8
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
Foodservice and other
|
|
|
314,162
|
|
|
|
280,073
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total specialty
|
|
|
683,317
|
|
|
|
558,060
|
|
|
|
22.4
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
|
6,178,557
|
|
|
|
5,097,515
|
|
|
|
21.2
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Cost of sales including occupancy costs
|
|
|
2,374,485
|
|
|
|
1,944,356
|
|
|
|
22.1
|
|
|
|
38.4
|
|
|
|
38.1
|
|
Store operating expenses(1)
|
|
|
2,280,044
|
|
|
|
1,848,836
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
|
|
|
36.9
|
|
|
|
36.3
|
|
Other operating expenses(2)
|
|
|
190,624
|
|
|
|
150,712
|
|
|
|
26.5
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expenses
|
|
|
284,625
|
|
|
|
250,339
|
|
|
|
13.7
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
93,754
|
|
|
|
85,362
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
5,223,532
|
|
|
|
4,279,605
|
|
|
|
22.1
|
|
|
|
84.5
|
|
|
|
83.9
|
|
Income from equity investees
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
955,176
|
|
|
$
|
818,502
|
|
|
|
16.7
|
%
|
|
|
15.5
|
%
|
|
|
16.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As a percentage of related Company-operated retail revenues,
store operating expenses were 41.5% and 40.7% for the fiscal
years ended October 1, 2006 and October 2, 2005,
respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
As a percentage of related total specialty revenues, other
operating expenses were 27.9% and 27.0% for the fiscal years
ended October 1, 2006 and October 2, 2005,
respectively. |
United States total net revenues increased 21% to
$6.2 billion for the fiscal year ended 2006, compared to
$5.1 billion for fiscal 2005.
United States Company-operated retail revenues increased 21% to
$5.5 billion for the fiscal year ended 2006, compared to
$4.5 billion for fiscal 2005. United States
Company-operated retail revenues increased primarily due to the
opening of 810 new Company-operated retail stores in the last
12 months and comparable store sales growth of 7% for
fiscal 2006. The increase in comparable store sales was due to a
5% increase in the number of customer transactions and a 2%
increase in the average value per transaction.
Total United States specialty revenues increased 22% to
$683 million for the fiscal year ended 2006, compared to
$558 million in fiscal 2005. United States licensing
revenues increased 33% to $369 million, compared to
$278 million for fiscal 2005. United States licensing
revenues increased due to increased product sales and royalty
revenues as a result of opening 733 new licensed retail stores
in the last 12 months. Foodservice and other revenues
increased 12% to $314 million from $280 million for
fiscal 2005. United States foodservice and other revenues
increased primarily due to growth in new and existing
foodservice accounts.
United States operating income increased 17% to
$955 million for the fiscal year ended 2006, from
$819 million for the fiscal year ended 2005. Operating
margin decreased to 15.5% of related revenues from 16.1% in
fiscal 2005. The decrease was due to the recognition of
stock-based compensation expense.
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended
|
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
Oct 2,
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
Oct 2,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of international total net revenues
|
|
|
Net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-operated retail
|
|
$
|
1,087,858
|
|
|
$
|
852,472
|
|
|
|
27.6
|
%
|
|
|
83.5
|
%
|
|
|
83.4
|
%
|
Specialty:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
186,050
|
|
|
|
145,736
|
|
|
|
27.7
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
Foodservice and other
|
|
|
29,006
|
|
|
|
24,285
|
|
|
|
19.4
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total specialty
|
|
|
215,056
|
|
|
|
170,021
|
|
|
|
26.5
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
16.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
|
1,302,914
|
|
|
|
1,022,493
|
|
|
|
27.4
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Cost of sales including occupancy costs
|
|
|
625,008
|
|
|
|
511,761
|
|
|
|
22.1
|
|
|
|
48.0
|
|
|
|
50.1
|
|
Store operating expenses(1)
|
|
|
407,771
|
|
|
|
317,075
|
|
|
|
28.6
|
|
|
|
31.3
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Other operating expenses(2)
|
|
|
50,900
|
|
|
|
32,061
|
|
|
|
58.8
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expenses
|
|
|
66,800
|
|
|
|
56,705
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
78,337
|
|
|
|
53,069
|
|
|
|
47.6
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
1,228,816
|
|
|
|
970,671
|
|
|
|
26.6
|
|
|
|
94.3
|
|
|
|
95.0
|
|
Income from equity investees
|
|
|
34,370
|
|
|
|
30,477
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
108,468
|
|
|
$
|
82,299
|
|
|
|
31.8
|
%
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As a percentage of related Company-operated retail revenues,
store operating expenses were 37.5% and 37.2% for the fiscal
years ended October 1, 2006 and October 2, 2005,
respectively. |
30
|
|
|
(2) |
|
As a percentage of related total specialty revenues, other
operating expenses were 23.7% and 18.9% for the fiscal years
ended October 1, 2006 and October 2, 2005,
respectively. |
International total net revenues increased 27% to
$1.3 billion for the fiscal year ended 2006, compared to
$1.0 billion for fiscal 2005. International
Company-operated retail revenues increased 28% to
$1.1 billion for the fiscal year ended 2006, compared to
$852 million for fiscal 2005. International
Company-operated revenues increased due to the opening of 233
new Company-operated retail stores in the last 12 months,
comparable store sales growth of 8% for fiscal 2006, and the
weakening of the U.S. dollar against the Canadian dollar.
The increase in comparable store sales resulted from a 5%
increase in the number of customer transactions and a 3%
increase in the average value per transaction.
Total International specialty revenues increased 26% to
$215 million for the fiscal year ended 2006, compared to
$170 million for fiscal 2005. International licensing
revenues increased 28% to $186 million for the fiscal year
ended 2006, compared to $146 million in fiscal 2005.
International licensing revenues increased due to higher product
sales and royalty revenues from opening 423 new licensed retail
stores in the last 12 months. International foodservice and
other revenues increased 19% to $29 million for the fiscal
year ended 2006, compared to $24 million in fiscal 2005.
International foodservice and other revenues increased primarily
due to growth in the total number of foodservice accounts.
International operating income increased to $108 million
for the fiscal year ended 2006, compared to $82 million in
fiscal 2005. Operating margin increased to 8.3% of related
revenues from 8.0% in fiscal 2005, primarily due to lower cost
of sales including occupancy costs due to leverage gained from
fixed costs distributed over an expanded revenue base, as well
as lower dairy costs. These improvements were partially offset
by higher store operating expenses and other operating expenses
due to higher payroll-related expenditures primarily to support
global expansion as well as the recognition of stock-based
compensation expense.
Global
Consumer Products Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended
|
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
Oct 2,
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
Oct 2,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of CPG total net revenues
|
|
|
Net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
$
|
305,471
|
|
|
$
|
249,292
|
|
|
|
22.5
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total specialty
|
|
|
305,471
|
|
|
|
249,292
|
|
|
|
22.5
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
179,298
|
|
|
|
149,095
|
|
|
|
20.3
|
|
|
|
58.7
|
|
|
|
59.8
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
12,200
|
|
|
|
9,752
|
|
|
|
25.1
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expenses
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
42.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
6,363
|
|
|
|
4,499
|
|
|
|
41.4
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
197,969
|
|
|
|
163,422
|
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
|
|
64.8
|
|
|
|
65.5
|
|
Income from equity investees
|
|
|
59,416
|
|
|
|
45,579
|
|
|
|
30.4
|
|
|
|
19.4
|
|
|
|
18.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
166,918
|
|
|
$
|
131,449
|
|
|
|
27.0
|
%
|
|
|
54.6
|
%
|
|
|
52.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPG total net revenues increased 23% to $305 million for
the fiscal year ended 2006, compared to $249 million for
fiscal 2005, primarily due to volume growth in the licensed
grocery and warehouse club business as well as sales of
ready-to-drink coffee beverages introduced in Japan and Taiwan
in the fall of 2005 and Korea in December of 2005.
CPG operating income increased to $167 million for the
fiscal year ended 2006, compared to $131 million for fiscal
2005. Operating margin increased to 54.6% of related revenues,
from 52.7% in fiscal 2005, primarily due to higher income from
the Companys equity investees and lower cost of sales as a
percentage of revenues. The increase in equity investee income
was primarily due to volume-driven results for The North
American Coffee Partnership, which produces ready-to-drink
beverages which include, among others, bottled
Frappuccino®
beverages and
31
Starbucks
DoubleShot®
espresso drinks. Lower cost of sales was due to a sales mix
shift to products with higher gross margins.
Unallocated
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended
|
|
|
52 Weeks Ended
|
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
Oct 2,
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
Oct 2,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of total net revenues
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expenses
|
|
$
|
35,678
|
|
|
$
|
33,049
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
300,932
|
|
|
|
218,683
|
|
|
|
37.6
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
$
|
(336,610
|
)
|
|
$
|
(251,732
|
)
|
|
|
33.7
|
%
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated corporate expenses increased to $337 million
for the fiscal year ended 2006, from $252 million in fiscal
2005. The increase was due to higher payroll-related
expenditures from the recognition of stock-based compensation
expense and to additional employees, as well as higher
professional fees primarily in support of global systems
infrastructure development. Total unallocated corporate expenses
as a percentage of total net revenues were 4.3% for the fiscal
year ended 2006, compared to 3.9% for fiscal 2005.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The primary sources of the Companys liquidity are cash
flows generated from retail store operations and other business
channels, borrowings under available commercial paper programs
and credit agreements, proceeds from the issuance of long-term
debt securities and the Companys existing cash and liquid
investments, which were $460 million and $459 million
as of September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006,
respectively.
Components of the Companys most liquid assets are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
281,261
|
|
|
$
|
312,606
|
|
Short-term investments available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
83,845
|
|
|
|
87,542
|
|
Short-term investments trading securities
|
|
|
73,588
|
|
|
|
53,496
|
|
Long-term investments available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
21,022
|
|
|
|
5,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and liquid investments
|
|
$
|
459,716
|
|
|
$
|
459,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to hedge its liability under its Management Deferred
Compensation Plan (MDCP), the Company maintains a
portfolio of unrestricted trading securities, the value of which
was $74 million as of September 30, 2007. In addition,
unrestricted cash and liquid securities held within the
Companys wholly owned captive insurance company to fund
claim payouts totaled approximately $98 million as of
September 30, 2007. The Company manages the balance of its
cash and liquid investments in order to internally fund
operating needs and make scheduled payments on short-term
borrowings.
In determining the appropriate capital structure for the
Company, management considers, among other things, how debt may
reduce its total cost of capital when used to fund increased
distributions to shareholders in the form of stock repurchases.
The Company also evaluates its degree of cash flow risk and how
much financial flexibility should be retained for future
investment opportunities given its high growth rate. The
Companys key metrics for monitoring its capital structure
are leverage, measured as the ratio of debt to EBITDA, and
coverage, measured as the ratio of EBITDA to interest expense
including rent expense. Both ratios are adjusted to capitalize
operating leases. The credit rating agencies, Moodys and
Standard & Poors, currently rate the
Companys commercial paper
P-2 and
A-2,
respectively, and its long-term debt Baa1 and BBB+, respectively.
The Company intends to use its cash and liquid investments,
including any borrowings under its revolving credit facility,
commercial paper program and proceeds from the issuance of long
term debt securities, to invest in its core businesses and other
new business opportunities related to its core businesses. The
Company may use its available
32
cash resources to make proportionate capital contributions to
its equity method and cost method investees, as well as purchase
larger ownership interests in selected equity method investees
and licensed operations, particularly in international markets.
Depending on market conditions, Starbucks may repurchase shares
of its common stock under its authorized share repurchase
program. Management believes that strong cash flow generated
from operations, existing cash and liquid investments, as well
as borrowing capacity under the revolving credit facility and
commercial paper program, should be sufficient to finance
capital requirements for its core businesses for the foreseeable
future. Significant new joint ventures, acquisitions, share
repurchases
and/or other
new business opportunities may require additional outside
funding.
Other than normal operating expenses, cash requirements for
fiscal 2008 are expected to consist primarily of capital
expenditures for new Company-operated retail stores and the
remodeling and refurbishment of existing Company-operated retail
stores, as well as potential increased investments in
International licensees and for additional share repurchases, if
any. Management expects capital expenditures for fiscal 2008 to
be consistent with the $1.1 billion invested in fiscal
2007, primarily driven by new store development and existing
store renovations.
Cash provided by operating activities totaled $1.3 billion
for fiscal 2007. Of this amount, net earnings provided
$673 million and noncash depreciation and amortization
expenses further increased cash provided by operating activities
by $491 million. In addition, an increase in accrued taxes
payable due to the timing of payments provided $86 million.
Cash used by investing activities for fiscal 2007 totaled
$1.2 billion. Net capital additions to property, plant and
equipment used $1.1 billion, primarily from opening 1,342
new Company-operated retail stores and remodeling certain
existing stores. During fiscal 2007, the Company used
$53 million for acquisitions, net of cash acquired. In
addition, the net activity in the Companys portfolio of
available-for-sale securities used $12 million.
Cash used by financing activities for fiscal 2007 totaled
$172 million. Cash used to repurchase shares of the
Companys common stock totaled $997 million. This
amount includes the effect of the net change in unsettled trades
from October 1, 2006. Share repurchases, up to the limit
authorized by the Board of Directors, are at the discretion of
management and depend on market conditions, capital requirements
and other factors. As of September 30, 2007, a total of up
to 13.5 million shares remained available for repurchase,
under existing authorizations.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company issued
$550 million of 6.25% Senior Notes due in August 2017,
in an underwritten registered public offering. The proceeds of
$549 million, before expenses, were primarily used to repay
short-term borrowings and fund additional share repurchases. Net
new borrowings under the Companys credit facility and
commercial paper program were $10 million for fiscal 2007.
As of September 30, 2007, a total of $710 million in
borrowings were outstanding under the commercial paper program
and $13 million in letters of credit were outstanding under
the credit facility, leaving $275 million of capacity
available under the $1 billion combined commercial paper
program and revolving credit facility.
Partially offsetting cash used for share repurchases were
proceeds of $177 million from the exercise of employee
stock options and the sale of the Companys common stock
from employee stock purchase plans. As options granted are
exercised, the Company will continue to receive proceeds and a
tax deduction; however, the amounts and the timing cannot be
predicted.
33
The following table summarizes the Companys contractual
obligations and borrowings as of September 30, 2007, and
the timing and effect that such commitments are expected to have
on the Companys liquidity and capital requirements in
future periods (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than 1
|
|
|
1 - 3
|
|
|
3 - 5
|
|
|
More Than 5
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Debt obligations(1)
|
|
$
|
1,607,845
|
|
|
$
|
747,268
|
|
|
$
|
69,896
|
|
|
$
|
68,806
|
|
|
$
|
721,875
|
|
Operating lease obligations(2)
|
|
|
5,016,583
|
|
|
|
691,011
|
|
|
|
1,300,776
|
|
|
|
1,109,193
|
|
|
|
1,915,603
|
|
Purchase obligations(3)
|
|
|
427,306
|
|
|
|
267,743
|
|
|
|
141,611
|
|
|
|
13,426
|
|
|
|
4,526
|
|
Other obligations(4)
|
|
|
57,594
|
|
|
|
1,181
|
|
|
|
17,159
|
|
|
|
4,741
|
|
|
|
34,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,109,328
|
|
|
$
|
1,707,203
|
|
|
$
|
1,529,442
|
|
|
$
|
1,196,166
|
|
|
$
|
2,676,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Debt amounts include principal maturities and expected interest
payments on commercial paper and long-term debt. |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts include the direct lease obligations, excluding any
taxes, insurance and other related expenses. |
|
(3) |
|
Purchase obligations include agreements to purchase goods or
services that are enforceable and legally binding on Starbucks
and that specify all significant terms. Purchase obligations
relate primarily to green coffee and other commodities. |
|
(4) |
|
Other obligations include other long-term liabilities primarily
consisting of asset retirement obligations, hedging instruments
and capital lease obligations. |
Starbucks expects to fund these commitments primarily with
operating cash flows generated in the normal course of business,
as well as ongoing borrowings under the commercial paper program.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangement
The Company has unconditionally guaranteed the repayment of
certain Japanese yen-denominated bank loans and related interest
and fees of an unconsolidated equity investee, Starbucks Coffee
Japan, Ltd. (Starbucks Japan). The guarantees
continue until the loans, including accrued interest and fees,
have been paid in full, with the final loan amount due in 2014.
The maximum amount is limited to the sum of unpaid principal and
interest amounts, as well as other related expenses. These
amounts will vary based on fluctuations in the yen foreign
exchange rate. As of September 30, 2007, the maximum amount
of the guarantees was approximately $4.9 million. Since
there has been no modification of these loan guarantees
subsequent to the Companys adoption of Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation
No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure
Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of
Indebtedness of Others, Starbucks has applied the
disclosure provisions only and has not recorded the guarantees
on its consolidated balance sheet.
COMMODITY
PRICES, AVAILABILITY AND GENERAL RISK CONDITIONS
Commodity price risk represents the Companys primary
market risk, generated by its purchases of green coffee and
dairy products. The Company purchases, roasts and sells high
quality whole bean coffee and related products and risk arises
from the price volatility of green coffee. In addition to
coffee, the Company also purchases significant amounts of dairy
products to support the needs of its Company-operated retail
stores. The price and availability of these commodities directly
impacts the Companys results of operations and can be
expected to impact its future results of operations. For
additional details see Product Supply in
Item 1, as well as Risk Factors in Item 1A
of this
Form 10-K.
FINANCIAL
RISK MANAGEMENT
Market risk is defined as the risk of losses due to changes in
commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates, equity
prices, and interest rates. The Company manages its exposure to
various market-based risks according to an umbrella risk
management policy. Under this policy, market-based risks are
quantified and evaluated for potential mitigation strategies,
such as entering into hedging transactions. The umbrella risk
management policy governs the
34
hedging instruments the business may use and limits the dollar
risk to net earnings. The Company also monitors and limits the
amount of associated counterparty credit risk. Additionally,
this policy restricts, among other things, the amount of
market-based risk the Company will tolerate before implementing
approved hedging strategies and prohibits speculative trading
activity. In general, hedge instruments do not have maturities
in excess of five years.
The sensitivity analyses performed below provide only a limited,
point-in-time
view of the market risk of the financial instruments discussed.
The actual impact of the respective underlying rates and price
changes on the financial instruments may differ significantly
from those shown in the sensitivity analyses.
Commodity
Price Risk
The Company purchases commodity inputs, including coffee and
dairy products that are used in its operations and are subject
to price fluctuations that impact its financial results. In
addition to fixed-priced contracts and price-to-be-fixed
contracts for coffee purchases, the Company may enter into
commodity hedges to manage commodity price risk using financial
derivative instruments. The Company performed a sensitivity
analysis based on a 10% change in the underlying commodity
prices of its commodity hedges, as of the end of fiscal 2007,
and determined that such a change would not have a significant
effect on the fair value of these instruments.
Foreign
Currency Exchange Risk
The majority of the Companys revenue, expense and capital
purchasing activities are transacted in U.S. dollars.
However, because a portion of the Companys operations
consists of activities outside of the United States, the Company
has transactions in other currencies, primarily the Canadian
dollar, British pound sterling, euro, and Japanese yen. As a
result, Starbucks may engage in transactions involving various
derivative instruments to hedge revenues, inventory purchases,
assets, and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies.
As of September 30, 2007, the Company had forward foreign
exchange contracts that qualify as cash flow hedges under
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS)
No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, as amended and interpreted, to hedge
portions of anticipated international revenue streams and
inventory purchases. In addition, Starbucks had forward foreign
exchange contracts that qualify as accounting hedges of its net
investment in Starbucks Japan, as well as the Companys net
investments in its Canadian, UK, and Chinese subsidiaries, to
minimize foreign currency exposure. These contracts expire
within 30 months.
The Company also had forward foreign exchange contracts that are
not designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes
(free standing derivatives), but which largely offset the
financial impact of translating certain foreign currency
denominated payables and receivables. Increases or decreases in
the fair value of these hedges are generally offset by
corresponding decreases or increases in the U.S. dollar
value of the Companys foreign currency denominated
payables and receivables (i.e. hedged items) that
would occur within the hedging period.
The following table summarizes the potential impact to the
Companys future net earnings and other comprehensive
income (OCI) from changes in the fair value of these
derivative financial instruments due in turn to a change in the
value of the U.S. dollar as compared to the level of
foreign exchange rates. The information provided below relates
only to the hedging instruments and does not represent the
corresponding changes in the underlying hedged items (in
millions):
September 30,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(Decrease) to Net Earnings
|
|
|
Increase/(Decrease) to OCI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10% Increase in
|
|
|
10% Decrease in
|
|
|
10% Increase in
|
|
|
10% Decrease in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying Rate
|
|
|
Underlying Rate
|
|
|
Underlying Rate
|
|
|
Underlying Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency hedges
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
Security Price Risk
The Company has minimal exposure to price fluctuations on equity
mutual funds within its trading portfolio. The trading
securities approximate a portion of the Companys liability
under the MDCP. A corresponding liability is included in
Accrued compensation and related costs on the
consolidated balance sheets. These investments are
35
recorded at fair value with unrealized gains and losses
recognized in Net interest and other income in the
consolidated statements of earnings. The offsetting changes in
the MDCP liability are recorded in General and
administrative expenses. The Company performed a
sensitivity analysis based on a 10% change in the underlying
equity prices of its investments, as of the end of fiscal 2007,
and determined that such a change would not have a significant
effect on the fair value of these instruments.
Interest
Rate Risk
The Company utilizes short and long term financing and may use
interest rate hedges to manage the effect of interest rate
changes on its existing debt as well as the anticipated issuance
of new debt. At the end of fiscal years 2007 and 2006, the
Company did not have any interest rate hedge agreements
outstanding. During the fiscal fourth quarter of 2007, the
Company had Treasury interest rate contracts in place to
mitigate a portion of the interest rate risk associated with the
$550 million Senior Notes issued in August 2007. These
contracts were dedesignated and settled at closing of the debt
offering.
The following table summarizes the impact of a change in
interest rates on the fair value of the Companys debt
(in millions):
September 30,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 Basis Point Increase in
|
|
|
100 Basis Point Decrease in
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Underlying Rate
|
|
|
Underlying Rate
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
$
|
1,269
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys available-for-sale securities comprise a
diversified portfolio consisting mainly of fixed income
instruments. The primary objectives of these investments are to
preserve capital and liquidity. Available-for-sale securities
are investment grade and are recorded on the balance sheet at
fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported as a
separate component of Accumulated other comprehensive
income. The Company does not hedge the interest rate
exposure on its available-for-sale securities. The Company
performed a sensitivity analysis based on a 100 basis point
change in the underlying interest rate of its available-for-sale
securities, as of the end of fiscal 2007, and determined that
such a change would not have a significant effect on the fair
value of these instruments.
SEASONALITY
AND QUARTERLY RESULTS
The Companys business is subject to seasonal fluctuations,
including fluctuations resulting from the holiday season. The
Companys cash flows from operations are considerably
higher in the fiscal first quarter than the remainder of the
year. This is largely driven by cash received as Starbucks Cards
are purchased and loaded during the holiday season. Since
revenues from the Starbucks Card are recognized upon redemption
and not when purchased, seasonal fluctuations on the
consolidated statements of earnings are much less pronounced.
Quarterly results are affected by the timing of the opening of
new stores, and the Companys growth may conceal the impact
of other seasonal influences. For these reasons, results for any
quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results that may
be achieved for the full fiscal year.
APPLICATION
OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Critical accounting policies are those that management believes
are both most important to the portrayal of the Companys
financial condition and results, and require managements
most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a
result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters
that are inherently uncertain. Judgments and uncertainties
affecting the application of those policies may result in
materially different amounts being reported under different
conditions or using different assumptions.
Starbucks considers its policies on impairment of long-lived
assets, stock-based compensation, operating leases, self
insurance reserves and income taxes to be the most critical in
understanding the judgments that are involved in preparing its
consolidated financial statements.
36
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
When facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying values
of long-lived assets may be impaired, an evaluation of
recoverability is performed by comparing the carrying values of
the assets to projected future cash flows, in addition to other
quantitative and qualitative analyses. For goodwill and other
intangible assets, impairment tests are performed annually and
more frequently if facts and circumstances indicate goodwill
carrying values exceed estimated reporting unit fair values and
if indefinite useful lives are no longer appropriate for the
Companys trademarks. Upon indication that the carrying
values of such assets may not be recoverable, the Company
recognizes an impairment loss as a charge against current
operations. Property, plant and equipment assets are grouped at
the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows
when assessing impairment. Cash flows for retail assets are
identified at the individual store level. Long-lived assets to
be disposed of are reported at the lower of their carrying
amount or fair value, less estimated costs to sell. Judgments
made by the Company related to the expected useful lives of
long-lived assets and the ability of the Company to realize
undiscounted cash flows in excess of the carrying amounts of
such assets are affected by factors such as the ongoing
maintenance and improvements of the assets, changes in economic
conditions and changes in operating performance. As the Company
assesses the ongoing expected cash flows and carrying amounts of
its long-lived assets, these factors could cause the Company to
realize material impairment charges.
Stock-based
Compensation
Starbucks accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance
with the fair value recognition provisions of
SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment. The
Company uses the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model which
requires the input of subjective assumptions. These assumptions
include estimating the length of time employees will retain
their stock options before exercising them (expected
term), the estimated volatility of the Companys
common stock price over the expected term and the number of
options that will ultimately not complete their vesting
requirements (forfeitures). Changes in the
subjective assumptions could materially affect the estimate of
fair value of stock-based compensation; however based on an
analysis using changes in certain assumptions that could be
reasonably possible in the near term, management believes the
effect on the expense recognized for fiscal 2007 would not have
been material.
Operating
Leases
Starbucks leases retail stores, roasting and distribution
facilities and office space under operating leases. The Company
provides for an estimate of asset retirement obligation
(ARO) expense at the lease inception date for
operating leases with requirements to remove leasehold
improvements at the end of the lease term. Estimating AROs
involves subjective assumptions regarding both the amount and
timing of actual future retirement costs. Future actual costs
could differ significantly from amounts initially estimated. In
addition, the large number of operating leases and the
significant number of international markets in which the Company
has operating leases adds administrative complexity to the
calculation of ARO expense, as well as to the other technical
accounting requirements of operating leases such as contingent
rent.
Self
Insurance Reserves
The Company uses a combination of insurance and self-insurance
mechanisms, including a wholly owned captive insurance entity
and participation in a reinsurance pool, to provide for the
potential liabilities for workers compensation, healthcare
benefits, general liability, property insurance, director and
officers liability insurance and vehicle liability.
Liabilities associated with the risks that are retained by the
Company are not discounted and are estimated, in part, by
considering historical claims experience, demographic factors,
severity factors and other actuarial assumptions. The estimated
accruals for these liabilities could be significantly affected
if future occurrences and claims differ from these assumptions
and historical trends.
Income
Taxes
Starbucks accounts for income taxes in accordance with Statement
of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes, which recognizes deferred tax assets and
liabilities based on the differences between the financial
statement
37
carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using current
enacted tax rates in effect for the years in which those
temporary differences are expected to reverse. Judgment is
required in determining the provision for income taxes and
related accruals, deferred tax assets and liabilities. These
include establishing a valuation allowance related to the
realizability of certain deferred tax assets, and contingent tax
liabilities provided for the possibility of unfavorable outcomes
in certain tax positions. Although the Company believes that its
estimates are reasonable, actual results could differ from these
estimates.
RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN 48), which seeks to reduce the diversity
in practice associated with the accounting and reporting for
uncertainty in income tax positions. This Interpretation
prescribes a comprehensive model for the financial statement
recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of
uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income
tax returns. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2006, and the Company will adopt the new
requirements in its first fiscal quarter of 2008. The cumulative
effect of adopting FIN 48 will be recorded as an adjustment
to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of
adoption. The Company expects that the effect of adopting
FIN 48 will result in an immaterial adjustment to fiscal
year 2008 opening retained earnings.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157),
which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157
is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods
within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted.
Starbucks must adopt these new requirements no later than its
first fiscal quarter of 2009. Starbucks has not yet determined
the effect on the Companys consolidated financial
statements, if any, upon adoption of SFAS 157, or if it
will adopt the requirements prior to the first fiscal quarter of
2009.
In September 2006, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of
Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in
Current Year Financial Statements
(SAB 108). The intent of SAB 108 is to
reduce diversity in practice for the method companies use to
quantify financial statement misstatements, including the effect
of prior year uncorrected errors. SAB 108 establishes an
approach that requires quantification of financial statement
errors using both an income statement and cumulative balance
sheet approach. SAB 108 was effective for annual financial
statements for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006,
and the Company adopted the new requirements in fiscal 2007 with
no impact to its consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities (SFAS 159). SFAS 159
permits companies to choose to measure many financial
instruments and certain other items at fair value. SFAS 159
is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007, or Starbucks first
fiscal quarter of 2009. Early adoption is permitted. Starbucks
has not yet determined if it will elect to apply any of the
provisions of SFAS 159 or what the effect of adoption of
the statement would have, if any, on its consolidated financial
statements.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to the section entitled Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Commodity Prices, Availability and
General Risk Conditions and Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Financial Risk Management in
Item 7 of this Report.
38
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
STARBUCKS
CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sept 30, 2007
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
|
Oct 2, 2005
|
|
|
|
In thousands, except earnings per share
|
|
|
Net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-operated retail
|
|
$
|
7,998,265
|
|
|
$
|
6,583,098
|
|
|
$
|
5,391,927
|
|
Specialty:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
1,026,338
|
|
|
|
860,676
|
|
|
|
673,015
|
|
Foodservice and other
|
|
|
386,894
|
|
|
|
343,168
|
|
|
|
304,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total specialty
|
|
|
1,413,232
|
|
|
|
1,203,844
|
|
|
|
977,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
|
9,411,497
|
|
|
|
7,786,942
|
|
|
|
6,369,300
|
|
Cost of sales including occupancy costs
|
|
|
3,999,124
|
|
|
|
3,178,791
|
|
|
|
2,605,212
|
|
Store operating expenses
|
|
|
3,215,889
|
|
|
|
2,687,815
|
|
|
|
2,165,911
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
294,136
|
|
|
|
253,724
|
|
|
|
192,525
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expenses
|
|
|
467,160
|
|
|
|
387,211
|
|
|
|
340,169
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
489,249
|
|
|
|
479,386
|
|
|
|
361,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
8,465,558
|
|
|
|
6,986,927
|
|
|
|
5,665,430
|
|
Income from equity investees
|
|
|
108,006
|
|
|
|
93,937
|
|
|
|
76,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
1,053,945
|
|
|
|
893,952
|
|
|
|
780,518
|
|
Net interest and other income
|
|
|
2,419
|
|
|
|
12,291
|
|
|
|
15,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
1,056,364
|
|
|
|
906,243
|
|
|
|
796,347
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
383,726
|
|
|
|
324,770
|
|
|
|
301,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle
|
|
|
672,638
|
|
|
|
581,473
|
|
|
|
494,370
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change for FIN 47, net of
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
672,638
|
|
|
$
|
564,259
|
|
|
$
|
494,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle basic
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
|
$
|
0.63
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change for FIN 47, net of
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings basic
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
$
|
0.74
|
|
|
$
|
0.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle diluted
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
$
|
0.73
|
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change for FIN 47, net of
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings diluted
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
749,763
|
|
|
|
766,114
|
|
|
|
789,570
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
770,091
|
|
|
|
792,556
|
|
|
|
815,417
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
39
STARBUCKS
CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
In thousands, except share data
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
281,261
|
|
|
$
|
312,606
|
|
Short-term investments available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
83,845
|
|
|
|
87,542
|
|
Short-term investments trading securities
|
|
|
73,588
|
|
|
|
53,496
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
287,925
|
|
|
|
224,271
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
691,658
|
|
|
|
636,222
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
148,757
|
|
|
|
126,874
|
|
Deferred income taxes, net
|
|
|
129,453
|
|
|
|
88,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,696,487
|
|
|
|
1,529,788
|
|
Long-term investments available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
21,022
|
|
|
|
5,811
|
|
Equity and other investments
|
|
|
258,846
|
|
|
|
219,093
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
2,890,433
|
|
|
|
2,287,899
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
219,422
|
|
|
|
186,917
|
|
Other intangible assets
|
|
|
42,043
|
|
|
|
37,955
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
215,625
|
|
|
|
161,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
5,343,878
|
|
|
$
|
4,428,941
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper and short-term borrowings
|
|
$
|
710,248
|
|
|
$
|
700,000
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
390,836
|
|
|
|
340,937
|
|
Accrued compensation and related costs
|
|
|
332,331
|
|
|
|
288,963
|
|
Accrued occupancy costs
|
|
|
74,591
|
|
|
|
54,868
|
|
Accrued taxes
|
|
|
92,516
|
|
|
|
94,010
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
257,369
|
|
|
|
224,154
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
296,900
|
|
|
|
231,926
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
|
762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
2,155,566
|
|
|
|
1,935,620
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
550,121
|
|
|
|
1,958
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
354,074
|
|
|
|
262,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
3,059,761
|
|
|
|
2,200,435
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock ($0.001 par value) authorized,
1,200,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding, 738,285,285
and 756,602,071 shares, respectively, (includes 3,420,448
common stock units in both periods)
|
|
|
738
|
|
|
|
756
|
|
Other additional
paid-in-capital
|
|
|
39,393
|
|
|
|
39,393
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
2,189,366
|
|
|
|
2,151,084
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
54,620
|
|
|
|
37,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
2,284,117
|
|
|
|
2,228,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
$
|
5,343,878
|
|
|
$
|
4,428,941
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
40
STARBUCKS
CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
Oct 2,
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
In thousands
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
672,638
|
|
|
$
|
564,259
|
|
|
$
|
494,370
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change for FIN 47, net of
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
491,238
|
|
|
|
412,625
|
|
|
|
367,207
|
|
Provision for impairments and asset disposals
|
|
|
26,032
|
|
|
|
19,622
|
|
|
|
19,464
|
|
Deferred income taxes, net
|
|
|
(37,326
|
)
|
|
|
(84,324
|
)
|
|
|
(31,253
|
)
|
Equity in income of investees
|
|
|
(65,743
|
)
|
|
|
(60,570
|
)
|
|
|
(49,537
|
)
|
Distributions of income from equity investees
|
|
|
65,927
|
|
|
|
49,238
|
|
|
|
30,919
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
103,865
|
|
|
|
105,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
7,705
|
|
|
|
1,318
|
|
|
|
109,978
|
|
Excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
(93,055
|
)
|
|
|
(117,368
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net amortization of premium on securities
|
|
|
653
|
|
|
|
2,013
|
|
|
|
10,097
|
|
Cash provided/(used) by changes in operating assets and
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(48,576
|
)
|
|
|
(85,527
|
)
|
|
|
(121,618
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
36,068
|
|
|
|
104,966
|
|
|
|
9,717
|
|
Accrued compensation and related costs
|
|
|
38,628
|
|
|
|
54,424
|
|
|
|
22,711
|
|
Accrued taxes
|
|
|
86,371
|
|
|
|
132,725
|
|
|
|
14,435
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
63,233
|
|
|
|
56,547
|
|
|
|
53,276
|
|
Other operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(16,437
|
)
|
|
|
(41,193
|
)
|
|
|
(6,851
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
1,331,221
|
|
|
|
1,131,633
|
|
|
|
922,915
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
(237,422
|
)
|
|
|
(639,192
|
)
|
|
|
(643,488
|
)
|
Maturity of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
178,167
|
|
|
|
269,134
|
|
|
|
469,554
|
|
Sale of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
47,497
|
|
|
|
431,181
|
|
|
|
626,113
|
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(53,293
|
)
|
|
|
(91,734
|
)
|
|
|
(21,583
|
)
|
Net purchases of equity, other investments and other assets
|
|
|
(56,552
|
)
|
|
|
(39,199
|
)
|
|
|
(7,915
|
)
|
Net additions to property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(1,080,348
|
)
|
|
|
(771,230
|
)
|
|
|
(643,296
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities
|
|
|
(1,201,951
|
)
|
|
|
(841,040
|
)
|
|
|
(220,615
|
)
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of commercial paper
|
|
|
(16,600,841
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of commercial paper
|
|
|
17,311,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of short-term borrowings
|
|
|
(1,470,000
|
)
|
|
|
(993,093
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from short-term borrowings
|
|
|
770,000
|
|
|
|
1,416,093
|
|
|
|
277,000
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
176,937
|
|
|
|
159,249
|
|
|
|
163,555
|
|
Excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
93,055
|
|
|
|
117,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on long-term debt
|
|
|
(784
|
)
|
|
|
(898
|
)
|
|
|
(735
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
548,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(996,798
|
)
|
|
|
(854,045
|
)
|
|
|
(1,113,647
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(3,505
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by financing activities
|
|
|
(171,887
|
)
|
|
|
(155,326
|
)
|
|
|
(673,827
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
11,272
|
|
|
|
3,530
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(31,345
|
)
|
|
|
138,797
|
|
|
|
28,756
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
312,606
|
|
|
|
173,809
|
|
|
|
145,053
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
$
|
281,261
|
|
|
$
|
312,606
|
|
|
$
|
173,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, net of capitalized interest
|
|
$
|
35,294
|
|
|
$
|
10,576
|
|
|
$
|
1,060
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$
|
342,223
|
|
|
$
|
274,134
|
|
|
$
|
227,812
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
41
STARBUCKS
CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Other Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income/(Loss)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
In thousands, except share data
|
|
|
Balance, October 3, 2004
|
|
|
794,811,688
|
|
|
$
|
795
|
|
|
$
|
955,890
|
|
|
$
|
39,393
|
|
|
$
|
1,444,617
|
|
|
$
|
29,241
|
|
|
$
|
2,469,936
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
494,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
494,370
|
|
Unrealized holding gain, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
Translation adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,677
|
)
|
|
|
(8,677
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
486,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options, including tax benefit of $108,428
|
|
|
16,169,992
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
239,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239,028
|
|
Sale of common stock, including tax benefit of $1,550
|
|
|
1,563,964
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
34,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,505
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(45,103,534
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(1,139,205
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,139,250
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, October 2, 2005
|
|
|
767,442,110
|
|
|
$
|
767
|
|
|
$
|
90,201
|
|
|
$
|
39,393
|
|
|
$
|
1,938,987
|
|
|
$
|
20,914
|
|
|
$
|
2,090,262
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
564,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
564,259
|
|
Unrealized holding gain, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,767
|
|
|
|
1,767
|
|
Translation adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,592
|
|
|
|
14,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
580,618
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,738
|
|
Exercise of stock options, including tax benefit of $116,762
|
|
|
13,222,729
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
235,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
235,285
|
|
Sale of common stock, including tax benefit of $1,924
|
|
|
1,544,634
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
42,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,651
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(25,607,402
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(475,860
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(352,162
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(828,048
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, October 1, 2006
|
|
|
756,602,071
|
|
|
$
|
756
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
39,393
|
|
|
$
|
2,151,084
|
|
|
$
|
37,273
|
|
|
$
|
2,228,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
672,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
672,638
|
|
Unrealized holding loss, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,380
|
)
|
|
|
(20,380
|
)
|
Translation adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,727
|
|
|
|
37,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
689,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,373
|
|
Exercise of stock options, including tax benefit of $95,276
|
|
|
12,744,226
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
225,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225,246
|
|
Sale of common stock, including tax provision of $139
|
|
|
1,908,407
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
46,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,828
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(32,969,419
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(378,432
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(634,356
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,012,821
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2007
|
|
|
738,285,285
|
|
|
$
|
738
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
39,393
|
|
|
$
|
2,189,366
|
|
|
$
|
54,620
|
|
|
$
|
2,284,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
42
STARBUCKS
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Fiscal Years ended September 30, 2007, October 1,
2006, and October 2, 2005
|
|
Note 1:
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Description
of Business
Starbucks Corporation (together with its subsidiaries,
Starbucks or the Company) purchases and
roasts high-quality whole bean coffees and sells them, along
with fresh, rich-brewed coffees, Italian-style espresso
beverages, cold blended beverages, a variety of complementary
food items, coffee-related accessories and equipment, a
selection of premium teas and a line of compact discs, primarily
through its Company-operated retail stores. Starbucks also sells
coffee and tea products and licenses its trademark through other
channels and, through certain of its equity investees, Starbucks
produces and sells ready-to-drink beverages which include, among
others, bottled
Frappuccino®
beverages and Starbucks
DoubleShot®
espresso drinks, and a line of superpremium ice creams. All
channels outside the Company-operated retail stores are
collectively known as Specialty Operations. The
Companys objective is to establish Starbucks as one of the
most recognized and respected brands in the world. To achieve
this goal, the Company plans to continue expansion of its retail
operations, to grow its Specialty Operations and to selectively
pursue other opportunities to leverage the Starbucks brand by
introducing new products and developing new channels of
distribution. The Companys brand portfolio includes
superpremium
Tazo®
teas, Starbucks Hear
Music®
compact discs, Seattles Best
Coffee®
and Torrefazione
Italia®
coffee.
Principles
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements reflect the financial
position and operating results of Starbucks, including wholly
owned subsidiaries and investees controlled by the Company.
Investments in entities that the Company does not control, but
has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating
and financial policies, are accounted for under the equity
method. Investments in entities in which Starbucks does not have
the ability to exercise significant influence are accounted for
under the cost method. Intercompany transactions and balances
have been eliminated.
Fiscal
Year End
Starbucks Corporations fiscal year ends on the Sunday
closest to September 30. Some fiscal years include
53 weeks. The fiscal years ended on September 30,
2007, October 1, 2006 and October 2, 2005 included
52 weeks.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications of prior years balances have
been made to conform to the current format, including
reclassifications from Other operating expenses to
General and administrative expenses on the
consolidated statements of earnings.
Estimates
and Assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (GAAP) requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses. Actual results may differ
from these estimates.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with a
maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be
cash equivalents. The Company maintains cash and cash equivalent
balances with financial institutions that exceed federally
insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses
related to these balances, and management believes its credit
risk to be minimal.
43
Cash
Management
The Companys cash management system provides for the
funding of all major bank disbursement accounts on a daily basis
as checks are presented for payment. Under this system,
outstanding checks are in excess of the cash balances at certain
banks, which creates book overdrafts. Book overdrafts are
presented as a current liability in Accounts payable
on the consolidated balance sheets.
Short-term
and Long-term Investments
The Companys short-term and long-term investments consist
primarily of investment-grade marketable debt securities as well
as bond and equity mutual funds, all of which are classified as
available-for-sale or trading. Trading securities are recorded
at fair value with unrealized holding gains and losses included
in net earnings. Available-for-sale securities are recorded at
fair value, and unrealized holding gains and losses are
recorded, net of tax, as a separate component of accumulated
other comprehensive income. Available-for-sale securities with
remaining maturities of less than one year and those identified
by management at time of purchase for funding operations in less
than one year are classified as short-term, and all other
available-for-sale securities are classified as long-term.
Unrealized losses are charged against net earnings when a
decline in fair value is determined to be other than temporary.
Management reviews several factors to determine whether a loss
is other than temporary, such as the length of time a security
is in an unrealized loss position, the extent to which fair
value is less than amortized cost, the impact of changing
interest rates in the short and long term, the financial
condition and near term prospects of the issuer and the
Companys intent and ability to hold the security for a
period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery
in fair value. Realized gains and losses are accounted for on
the specific identification method. Purchases and sales are
recorded on a trade date basis.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximates
fair value because of the short-term maturity of those
instruments. The fair value of the Companys investments in
marketable debt and equity securities, as well as bond and
equity mutual funds, is based upon the quoted market price on
the last business day of the fiscal year. For equity securities
of companies that are privately held, or where an observable
quoted market price does not exist, the Company estimates fair
value using a variety of valuation methodologies. Such
methodologies include comparing the security with securities of
publicly traded companies in similar lines of business, applying
revenue multiples to estimated future operating results for the
private company and estimating discounted cash flows for that
company. Declines in fair value below the Companys
carrying value deemed to be other than temporary are charged
against net earnings. For further information on investments,
see Notes 3 and 6. The carrying value of short-term and
long-term debt approximates fair value.
Derivative
Instruments
The Company manages its exposure to various risks within the
consolidated financial statements according to an umbrella risk
management policy. Under this policy, Starbucks may engage in
transactions involving various derivative instruments, with
maturities generally not longer than five years, to hedge
interest rates, commodity prices, and foreign currency
denominated revenues, purchases, assets and liabilities.
The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
(SFAS) No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended and
interpreted, which requires that all derivatives be recorded on
the balance sheet at fair value. For a cash flow hedge, the
effective portion of the derivatives gain or loss is
initially reported as a component of other comprehensive income
(OCI) and subsequently reclassified into net
earnings when the hedged exposure affects net earnings. For a
net investment hedge, the effective portion of the
derivatives gain or loss is reported as a component of OCI.
Cash flow hedges related to anticipated transactions are
designated and documented at the inception of each hedge by
matching the terms of the contract to the underlying
transaction. The Company classifies the cash flows from hedging
transactions in the same categories as the cash flows from the
respective hedged items. Once established, cash flow hedges are
generally not removed until maturity unless an anticipated
transaction is no longer likely to occur. Discontinued or
dedesignated cash flow hedges are immediately settled with
counterparties, and the related
44
accumulated derivative gains or losses are recognized into net
earnings in Net interest and other income on the
consolidated statements of earnings.
Forward contract effectiveness for cash flow hedges is
calculated by comparing the fair value of the contract to the
change in value of the anticipated transaction using forward
rates on a monthly basis. For net investment hedges, the
spot-to-spot method is used to calculate effectiveness. Under
this method, the change in fair value of the forward contract
attributable to the changes in spot exchange rates (the
effective portion) is reported as a component of OCI. The
remaining change in fair value of the forward contract (the
ineffective portion) is reclassified into net earnings. Any
ineffectiveness is recognized immediately in Net interest
and other income on the consolidated statements of
earnings.
The Company also entered into foreign currency forward contracts
that are not designated as hedging instruments for accounting
purposes. These contracts are recorded at fair value, with the
changes in fair value recognized in Net interest and other
income on the consolidated statements of earnings.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
Allowance for doubtful accounts is calculated based on
historical experience, customer credit risk and application of
the specific identification method. As of September 30,
2007 and October 1, 2006, the allowance for doubtful
accounts was $3.2 million and $3.8 million,
respectively.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (primarily moving
average cost) or market. The Company records inventory reserves
for obsolete and slow-moving items and for estimated shrinkage
between physical inventory counts. Inventory reserves are based
on inventory turnover trends, historical experience and
application of the specific identification method. As of
September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006, inventory
reserves were $14.9 million and $10.5 million,
respectively.
Property,
Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost less
accumulated depreciation. Depreciation of property, plant and
equipment, which includes assets under capital leases, is
provided on the straight-line method over estimated useful
lives, generally ranging from two to seven years for equipment
and 30 to 40 years for buildings. Leasehold improvements
are amortized over the shorter of their estimated useful lives
or the related lease life, generally 10 years. For leases
with renewal periods at the Companys option, Starbucks
generally uses the original lease term, excluding renewal option
periods to determine estimated useful lives. If failure to
exercise a renewal option imposes an economic penalty to
Starbucks, management may determine at the inception of the
lease that renewal is reasonably assured and include the renewal
option period in the determination of appropriate estimated
useful lives. The portion of depreciation expense related to
production and distribution facilities is included in Cost
of sales including occupancy costs on the consolidated
statements of earnings. The costs of repairs and maintenance are
expensed when incurred, while expenditures for refurbishments
and improvements that significantly add to the productive
capacity or extend the useful life of an asset are capitalized.
When assets are retired or sold, the asset cost and related
accumulated depreciation are eliminated with any remaining gain
or loss reflected in net earnings.
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and other intangible assets are tested for impairment
annually and more frequently if facts and circumstances indicate
goodwill carrying values exceed estimated reporting unit fair
values and if indefinite useful lives are no longer appropriate
for the Companys trademarks. Based on the impairment tests
performed, there was no impairment of goodwill or other
intangible assets in fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005. Definite-lived
intangibles, which mainly consist of contract-based patents and
copyrights, are amortized over their estimated useful lives. For
further information on goodwill and other intangible assets, see
Note 8.
45
Long-lived
Assets
When facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying values
of long-lived assets may be impaired, an evaluation of
recoverability is performed by comparing the carrying values of
the assets to projected future cash flows in addition to other
quantitative and qualitative analyses. Upon indication that the
carrying values of such assets may not be recoverable, the
Company recognizes an impairment loss by a charge to net
earnings. Property, plant and equipment assets are grouped at
the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows
when assessing impairment. Cash flows for retail assets are
identified at the individual store level.
The Company recognized net impairment and disposition losses of
$26.0 million, $19.6 million and $19.5 million in
fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, due to renovation and
remodeling activity and from underperforming Company-operated
retail stores, in the normal course of business. Depending on
the underlying asset that is impaired, these losses may be
recorded in any one of the operating expense lines on the
consolidated statements of earnings: for retail operations,
these losses are recorded in Store operating
expenses; for Specialty Operations, these losses are
recorded in Other operating expenses; and for all
other operations, these losses are recorded in either Cost
of sales including occupancy costs or General and
administrative expenses.
Insurance
Reserves
The Company uses a combination of insurance and self-insurance
mechanisms, including a wholly owned captive insurance entity
and participation in a reinsurance pool, to provide for the
potential liabilities for workers compensation, healthcare
benefits, general liability, property insurance, director and
officers liability insurance and vehicle liability.
Liabilities associated with the risks that are retained by the
Company are not discounted and are estimated, in part, by
considering historical claims experience, demographic factors,
severity factors and other actuarial assumptions. The estimated
accruals for these liabilities could be significantly affected
if future occurrences and claims differ from these assumptions
and historical trends. As of September 30, 2007, and
October 1, 2006, these reserves were $137.0 million
and $113.2 million, respectively, and were included in
Accrued compensation and related costs and
Other accrued expenses on the consolidated balance
sheets.
Revenue
Recognition
Consolidated revenues are presented net of intercompany
eliminations for wholly owned subsidiaries and investees
controlled by the Company and for licensees accounted for under
the equity method, based on the Companys percentage
ownership. Additionally, consolidated revenues are recognized
net of any discounts, returns, allowances and sales incentives,
including coupon redemptions and rebates.
Stored
Value Cards
Revenues from the Companys stored value cards, such as the
Starbucks Card, and gift certificates are recognized when
tendered for payment, or upon redemption. Outstanding customer
balances are included in Deferred revenue on the
consolidated balance sheets. There are no expiration dates on
the Companys stored value cards or gift certificates, and
Starbucks does not charge any service fees that cause a
decrement to customer balances.
While the Company will continue to honor all stored value cards
and gift certificates presented for payment, management may
determine the likelihood of redemption to be remote for certain
card and certificate balances due to, among other things, long
periods of inactivity. In these circumstances, to the extent
management determines there is no requirement for remitting
balances to government agencies under unclaimed property laws,
card and certificate balances may be recognized in the
consolidated statements of earnings in Net interest and
other income. For the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006, income
recognized on unredeemed stored value card balances and gift
certificates was $12.9 million and $4.4 million,
respectively. There was no income recognized on unredeemed
stored value card balances during the fiscal year ended
October 2, 2005. There was no income recognized on gift
certificate balances during fiscal 2006 or 2005.
46
Retail
Revenues
Company-operated retail store revenues are recognized when
payment is tendered at the point of sale. Starbucks maintains a
sales return allowance, to reduce retail revenues for estimated
future product returns, including brewing equipment, based on
historical patterns. Retail store revenues are reported net of
sales, use or other transaction taxes that are collected from
customers and remitted to taxing authorities.
Specialty
Revenues
Specialty revenues consist primarily of product sales to
customers other than through Company-operated retail stores, as
well as royalties and other fees generated from licensing
operations. Sales of coffee, tea and related products are
generally recognized upon shipment to customers, depending on
contract terms. Shipping charges billed to customers are also
recognized as revenue, and the related shipping costs are
included in Cost of sales including occupancy costs
on the consolidated statements of earnings.
Specific to retail store licensing arrangements, initial
nonrefundable development fees are recognized upon substantial
performance of services for new market business development
activities, such as initial business, real estate and store
development planning, as well as providing operational materials
and functional training courses for opening new licensed retail
markets. Additional store licensing fees are recognized when new
licensed stores are opened. Royalty revenues based upon a
percentage of reported sales and other continuing fees, such as
marketing and service fees, are recognized on a monthly basis
when earned. For certain licensing arrangements, where the
Company intends to acquire an ownership interest, the initial
nonrefundable development fees are deferred to Other
long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets
until acquisition, at which point the fees are reflected as a
reduction of the Companys investment.
Other arrangements involving multiple elements and deliverables
as well as upfront fees are individually evaluated for revenue
recognition. Cash payments received in advance of product or
service delivery are recorded in Deferred revenue
until earned.
Advertising
The Company expenses most advertising costs as they are
incurred, except for certain production costs that are expensed
the first time the advertising campaign takes place and
direct-response advertising, which is capitalized and amortized
over its expected period of future benefits. Direct-response
advertising consists primarily of customer acquisition expenses
including applications for customers to apply for the Starbucks
Card
Duettotm
Visa®.
These capitalized costs are amortized over the life of the
credit card which is estimated to be three years.
Total advertising expenses, recorded in Store operating
expenses, Other operating expenses and
General and administrative expenses on the
consolidated statements of earnings, totaled
$103.5 million, $107.5 million and $87.7 million
in fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. As of
September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006,
$12.0 million and $19.2 million, respectively, of
capitalized advertising costs were recorded in Prepaid
expenses and other current assets and Other
assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
Research
and Development
Starbucks expenses research and development costs as they are
incurred. The Company spent approximately $7.0 million,
$6.5 million and $6.2 million during fiscal 2007, 2006
and 2005, respectively, on technical research and development
activities, in addition to customary product testing and product
and process improvements in all areas of its business.
Store
Preopening Expenses
Costs incurred in connection with the
start-up and
promotion of new store openings are expensed as incurred.
47
Operating
Leases
Starbucks leases retail stores, roasting and distribution
facilities and office space under operating leases. Most lease
agreements contain tenant improvement allowances, rent holidays,
lease premiums, rent escalation clauses
and/or
contingent rent provisions. For purposes of recognizing
incentives, premiums and minimum rental expenses on a
straight-line basis over the terms of the leases, the Company
uses the date of initial possession to begin amortization, which
is generally when the Company enters the space and begins to
make improvements in preparation of intended use.
For tenant improvement allowances and rent holidays, the Company
records a deferred rent liability in Accrued occupancy
costs and Other long-term liabilities on the
consolidated balance sheets and amortizes the deferred rent over
the terms of the leases as reductions to rent expense on the
consolidated statements of earnings.
For premiums paid upfront to enter a lease agreement, the
Company records a deferred rent asset in Prepaid expenses
and other current assets and Other assets on
the consolidated balance sheets and then amortizes the deferred
rent over the terms of the leases as additional rent expense on
the consolidated statements of earnings.
For scheduled rent escalation clauses during the lease terms or
for rental payments commencing at a date other than the date of
initial occupancy, the Company records minimum rental expenses
on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases on the
consolidated statements of earnings.
Certain leases provide for contingent rents, which are
determined as a percentage of gross sales in excess of specified
levels. The Company records a contingent rent liability in
Accrued occupancy costs on the consolidated balance
sheets and the corresponding rent expense when specified levels
have been achieved or when management determines that achieving
the specified levels during the fiscal year is probable.
Asset
Retirement Obligations
Starbucks accounts for asset retirement obligations under
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Interpretation No. 47 (FIN 47),
Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement
Obligations an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 143, which it adopted at the end of fiscal 2006.
FIN 47 requires recognition of a liability for the fair
value of a required asset retirement obligation
(ARO) when such obligation is incurred. The
Companys AROs are primarily associated with leasehold
improvements which, at the end of a lease, the Company is
contractually obligated to remove in order to comply with the
lease agreement. At the inception of a lease with such
conditions, the Company records an ARO liability and a
corresponding capital asset in an amount equal to the estimated
fair value of the obligation. The liability is estimated based
on a number of assumptions requiring managements judgment,
including store closing costs, cost inflation rates and discount
rates, and is accreted to its projected future value over time.
The capitalized asset is depreciated using the convention for
depreciation of leasehold improvement assets. Upon satisfaction
of the ARO conditions, any difference between the recorded ARO
liability and the actual retirement costs incurred is recognized
as an operating gain or loss in the consolidated statement of
earnings.
Total ARO expense in fiscal 2007 was $4.2 million with
components included in Costs of sales including occupancy
costs, Depreciation and amortization expenses
and Income from equity investees. The initial impact
of adopting FIN 47 at the end of fiscal year 2006 was a
charge of $27.1 million, with a related tax benefit of
$9.9 million, for a net expense of $17.2 million; as
required by FIN 47, the net amount was recorded as a
cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle on the
consolidated statement of earnings for fiscal year 2006. As of
September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006, the
Companys net ARO asset included in Property,
plant and equipment, net was $20.2 million and
$15.5 million, respectively, while the Companys
net ARO liability included in Other long-term
liabilities was $43.7 million and $34.3 million,
on the same respective dates.
Stock-based
Compensation
The Company maintains several equity incentive plans under which
it may grant non-qualified stock options, incentive stock
options, restricted stock, restricted stock units
(RSUs) or stock appreciation rights to employees,
non-employee directors and consultants. The Company also has
employee stock purchase plans (ESPP). RSUs
48
issued by the Company are equivalent to nonvested shares, as
defined by SFAS 123(R), Share-Based Payment
(SFAS 123R). See Note 13 for additional
details.
Foreign
Currency Translation
The Companys international operations generally use their
local currency as their functional currency. Assets and
liabilities are translated at exchange rates in effect at the
balance sheet date. Income and expense accounts are translated
at the average monthly exchange rates during the year. Resulting
translation adjustments are recorded as a separate component of
Accumulated other comprehensive income.
Income
Taxes
The Company computes income taxes using the asset and liability
method, under which deferred income taxes are provided for the
temporary differences between the financial statement carrying
amounts and the tax basis of the Companys assets and
liabilities. The Company will establish a valuation allowance
for deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that these
items will either expire before the Company is able to realize
their benefits, or that future deductibility is uncertain.
Periodically, the valuation allowance is reviewed and adjusted
based on managements assessments of realizable deferred
tax assets. The Company establishes, and periodically reviews
and re-evaluates, an estimated contingent tax liability to
provide for the possibility of unfavorable outcomes in tax
matters in accordance with the requirements of
SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies
(SFAS 5). See the Recent Accounting
Pronouncements at the end of this Note for a discussion of
the new accounting and disclosure requirements for uncertain tax
positions, which the Company will adopt in its first fiscal
quarter of 2008.
Earnings
per Share
The computation of basic earnings per share is based on the
weighted average number of shares and common stock units that
were outstanding during the period. The computation of diluted
earnings per share includes the dilutive effect of common stock
equivalents consisting of certain shares subject to stock
options and RSUs.
Common
Stock Share Repurchases
The Company may repurchase shares of its common stock under a
program authorized by its Board of Directors including pursuant
to a contract, instruction or written plan meeting the
requirements of
Rule 10b5-1(c)(1)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In accordance with the
Washington Business Corporation Act, share repurchases are not
displayed separately as treasury stock on the consolidated
balance sheets or consolidated statements of shareholders
equity. Instead, the par value of repurchased shares is deducted
from Common stock and the remaining excess
repurchase price over par value is deducted from
Additional paid-in capital and from Retained
earnings, once additional paid-in capital is depleted. See
Note 12 for additional information.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN 48), which seeks to reduce the diversity
in practice associated with the accounting and reporting for
uncertainty in income tax positions. This Interpretation
prescribes a comprehensive model for the financial statement
recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of
uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income
tax returns. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2006, and the Company will adopt the new
requirements in its first fiscal quarter of 2008. The cumulative
effect of adopting FIN 48 will be recorded as an adjustment
to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of
adoption. The Company expects that the effect of adopting
FIN 48 will result in an immaterial adjustment to fiscal
year 2008 opening retained earnings.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157),
which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157
is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods
within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted.
Starbucks must adopt these new requirements no later than its
first fiscal quarter of 2009. Starbucks has not yet
49
determined the effect on the Companys consolidated
financial statements, if any, upon adoption of SFAS 157, or
if it will adopt the requirements prior to the first fiscal
quarter of 2009.
In September 2006, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects of
Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in
Current Year Financial Statements
(SAB 108). The intent of SAB 108 is to
reduce diversity in practice for the method companies use to
quantify financial statement misstatements, including the effect
of prior year uncorrected errors. SAB 108 establishes an
approach that requires quantification of financial statement
errors using both an income statement and cumulative balance
sheet approach. SAB 108 was effective for annual financial
statements for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006,
and the Company adopted the new requirements in fiscal 2007 with
no impact to its consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities (SFAS 159). SFAS 159
permits companies to choose to measure many financial
instruments and certain other items at fair value. SFAS 159
is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007, or Starbucks first
fiscal quarter of 2009. Early adoption is permitted. Starbucks
has not yet determined if it will elect to apply any of the
provisions of SFAS 159 or what the effect of adoption of
the statement would have, if any, on its consolidated financial
statements.
|
|
Note 2:
|
Business
Acquisitions
|
In the first quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company purchased a 90%
stake in its previously-licensed operations in Beijing, China.
Due to its majority ownership of these operations, Starbucks
applied the consolidation method of accounting subsequent to the
date of acquisition.
50
|
|
Note 3:
|
Short-term
and Long-term Investments
|
The Companys short-term and long-term investments consist
of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Holding
|
|
|
Holding
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and local government obligations
|
|
$
|
81,366
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
$
|
81,345
|
|
U.S. government agency obligations
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
83,866
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
83,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments trading securities
|
|
|
67,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments
|
|
$
|
151,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
157,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agency obligations
|
|
$
|
21,000
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and local government obligations
|
|
$
|
75,379
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
(332
|
)
|
|
$
|
75,056
|
|
U.S. government agency obligations
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
2,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
2,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
87,867
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
(334
|
)
|
|
|
87,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments trading securities
|
|
|
55,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments
|
|
$
|
143,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
141,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and local government obligations
|
|
$
|
5,893
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(82
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For available-for-sale securities, proceeds from sales were
$47 million, $431 million and $626 million, in
fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Gross realized
gains from sales were $3.8 million and $0.1 million in
fiscal years 2006 and 2005, respectively. Gross realized losses
from sales were $0.1 million and $1.7 million in
fiscal years 2006 and 2005, respectively. For fiscal 2007, there
were no realized losses and an immaterial amount of realized
gains from sales.
51
The following tables present the length of time
available-for-sale securities were in continuous unrealized loss
positions but were not deemed to be other-than-temporarily
impaired (in thousands):
Consecutive
monthly unrealized losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater Than
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
or Equal to 12 Months
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Holding
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and local government obligations
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(21
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 1, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and local government obligations
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(414
|
)
|
|
$
|
49,960
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
2,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,486
|
|
|
$
|
(414
|
)
|
|
$
|
49,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized holding losses of $21 thousand for greater than
or equal to twelve months as of September 30, 2007,
pertained to two fixed income securities, specifically state and
local government obligations, and were primarily caused by
interest rate increases subsequent to the date of purchase. The
contractual terms of these securities do not permit the issuer
to settle at a price less than the par value of the investment,
which is the equivalent of the amount due at maturity. These
securities had a minimum credit rating of A+. Since
Starbucks has the ability and intent to hold these securities
until a recovery of fair value, which may be at maturity, and
because the unrealized losses were primarily due to higher
interest rates subsequent to the date of purchase, the Company
does not consider these securities to be other-than-temporarily
impaired.
There were no realized losses recorded for other than temporary
impairments during fiscal years 2007, 2006 or 2005.
Trading securities are comprised mainly of marketable equity
mutual funds that approximate a portion of the Companys
liability under the Management Deferred Compensation Plan
(MDCP), a defined contribution plan. The
corresponding deferred compensation liability of
$86.4 million in fiscal 2007 and $64.6 million in
fiscal 2006 is included in Accrued compensation and
related costs on the consolidated balance sheets. In
fiscal years 2007 and 2006, the changes in net unrealized
holding gains/losses in the trading portfolio included in
earnings were a net gain of $7.5 million and a net loss of
$4.2 million, respectively.
Long-term investments generally mature in less than two years.
|
|
Note 4:
|
Derivative
Financial Instruments
|
The Company may engage in transactions involving various
derivative instruments, with maturities generally not longer
than five years, to hedge interest rates, commodity prices, and
foreign currency denominated revenues, purchases, assets and
liabilities.
Cash
Flow Hedges
The Company and certain subsidiaries enter into cash flow
derivative instruments to hedge portions of anticipated revenue
streams and inventory purchases in currencies other than the
entitys functional currency. Outstanding forward
contracts, which comprise the majority of the Companys
derivative instruments, hedge monthly forecasted revenue
transactions denominated in Japanese yen and Canadian dollars,
as well as forecasted inventory purchases denominated primarily
in U.S. dollars for foreign operations. The Company also
has futures contracts to hedge the variable price component for
a small portion of its price-to-be-fixed green coffee purchase
contracts.
52
In addition, the Company entered into, dedesignated and settled
forward interest rate contracts during the fiscal fourth quarter
of 2007 in conjunction with a new debt issuance. These contracts
hedged movements in interest rates prior to issuance of the
Companys $550 million of 6.25% Senior Notes. See
Note 9 for additional information on Senior Notes.
The Company had accumulated net derivative losses of
$15.0 million, net of taxes, in other comprehensive income
as of September 30, 2007, related to cash flow hedges. Of
this amount, $6.6 million of net derivative losses pertain
to hedging instruments that will be dedesignated within
12 months and will also continue to experience fair value
changes before affecting earnings. Ineffectiveness from hedges
that were discontinued during the 52-week period ended
September 30, 2007 was insignificant. No cash flow hedges
were discontinued and no significant ineffectiveness was
recognized during the 52-week periods ended October 1, 2006
and October 2, 2005. Outstanding contracts will expire
within 24 months.
Net
Investment Hedges
Net investment derivative instruments are used to hedge the
Companys equity method investment in Starbucks Coffee
Japan, Ltd. (Starbucks Japan) as well as the
Companys net investments in its Canadian, UK, and Chinese
subsidiaries, to minimize foreign currency exposure. The Company
had accumulated net derivative losses of $12.0 million, net
of taxes, in other comprehensive income as of September 30,
2007, related to net investment derivative hedges. Outstanding
contracts expire within 30 months.
The following table presents the net gains and losses
reclassified from other comprehensive income into the
consolidated statements of earnings during the periods indicated
for cash flow and net investment hedges (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
Oct 2,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassified gains/(losses) into net revenues
|
|
$
|
1,494
|
|
|
$
|
1,489
|
|
|
$
|
(843
|
)
|
Reclassified losses into cost of sales
|
|
|
(2,201
|
)
|
|
|
(7,698
|
)
|
|
|
(4,535
|
)
|
Reclassified losses into other income
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reclassified losses cash flow hedges
|
|
|
(763
|
)
|
|
|
(6,209
|
)
|
|
|
(5,378
|
)
|
Net reclassified gains net investment hedges
|
|
|
6,031
|
|
|
|
3,754
|
|
|
|
1,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,268
|
|
|
$
|
(2,455
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,320
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Derivatives
Starbucks entered into foreign currency forward contracts that
are not designated as hedging instruments for accounting
purposes to mitigate the translation risk of certain balance
sheet items. For the 52-week period ended September 30,
2007, these forward contracts resulted in net losses of
$9.7 million. These losses were largely offset by the
financial impact of translating foreign currency denominated
payables and receivables, which are also recognized in Net
interest and other income. No similar contracts were held
as of October 1, 2006.
53
Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sept 30, 2007
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
|
Coffee:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unroasted
|
|
$
|
339,434
|
|
|
$
|
328,051
|
|
Roasted
|
|
|
88,615
|
|
|
|
80,199
|
|
Other merchandise held for sale
|
|
|
175,489
|
|
|
|
146,345
|
|
Packaging and other supplies
|
|
|
88,120
|
|
|
|
81,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
691,658
|
|
|
$
|
636,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other merchandise held for sale includes, among other items,
brewing equipment, serveware and retail media.
As of September 30, 2007, the Company had committed to
purchasing green coffee totaling $324 million under
fixed-price contracts and an estimated $49 million under
price-to-be-fixed contracts. The Company believes, based on
relationships established with its suppliers in the past, the
risk of non-delivery on such purchase commitments is remote.
|
|
Note 6:
|
Equity
and Other Investments
|
The Companys equity and other investments consist of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sept 30, 2007
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
|
Equity method investments
|
|
$
|
234,468
|
|
|
$
|
205,004
|
|
Cost method investments
|
|
|
24,378
|
|
|
|
14,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
258,846
|
|
|
$
|
219,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
Method
The Companys equity investees and ownership interests by
reportable operating segment are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sept 30, 2007
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
StarCon, LLC
|
|
|
50.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starbucks Coffee Korea Co., Ltd.
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
Starbucks Coffee Austria GmbH
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
Starbucks Coffee Switzerland AG
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
Starbucks Coffee España, S.L.
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
President Starbucks Coffee Taiwan Ltd.
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
Shanghai President Coffee Co.
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
Starbucks Coffee France SAS
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
Berjaya Starbucks Coffee Company Sdn. Bhd.
|
|
|
49.9
|
|
|
|
49.9
|
|
Starbucks Brasil Comercio de Cafes Ltda.
|
|
|
49.0
|
|
|
|
49.0
|
|
Starbucks Coffee Japan, Ltd
|
|
|
40.1
|
|
|
|
40.1
|
|
CPG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The North American Coffee Partnership
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
Starbucks Ice Cream Partnership
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
StarCon, LLC is a joint venture formed in March 2007 with
Concord Music Group, Inc. that is engaged in the recorded music
business. The International entities operate licensed Starbucks
retail stores. The Company also has licensed the rights to
produce and distribute Starbucks branded products to two
partnerships in which the Company holds 50% equity interests.
The North American Coffee Partnership with the Pepsi-Cola
Company develops and
54
distributes bottled
Frappuccino®
beverages and Starbucks
DoubleShot®
espresso drinks. The Starbucks Ice Cream Partnership with
Dreyers Grand Ice Cream, Inc. develops and distributes
superpremium ice creams.
During fiscal 2004, Starbucks acquired an equity interest in its
licensed operations of Malaysia. During fiscal 2003, Starbucks
increased its ownership of its licensed operations in Austria,
Shanghai, Spain, Switzerland and Taiwan. The carrying amount of
these investments was $24.3 million more than the
underlying equity in net assets due to acquired goodwill, which
is evaluated for impairment annually. No impairment was recorded
during fiscal years 2007, 2006 or 2005.
The Companys share of income and losses is included in
Income from equity investees on the consolidated
statements of earnings. Also included is the Companys
proportionate share of gross margin resulting from coffee and
other product sales to, and royalty and license fee revenues
generated from, equity investees. Revenues generated from these
related parties, net of eliminations, were $107.9 million,
$94.2 million and $86.1 million in fiscal years 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively. Related costs of sales, net of
eliminations, were $57.1 million, $47.5 million and
$43.3 million in fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. As of September 30, 2007 and October 1,
2006, there were $30.6 million and $17.7 million of
accounts receivable, respectively, on the consolidated balance
sheets from equity investees primarily related to product sales
and store license fees. As of September 30, 2007, there was
$1.6 million of accounts payable on the consolidated
balance sheet to equity investees related to product purchases.
There was no accounts payable balance as of October 1, 2006.
As of September 30, 2007, the aggregate market value of the
Companys investment in Starbucks Japan was approximately
$272 million, based on its available quoted market price.
Summarized combined financial information of the Companys
equity method investees, that represent 100% of the
investees financial information, is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Position as of
|
|
Sept 30, 2007
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
183,123
|
|
|
$
|
148,169
|
|
Noncurrent assets
|
|
|
408,591
|
|
|
|
358,818
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
166,386
|
|
|
|
133,304
|
|
Noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
56,807
|
|
|
|
58,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results of Operations for Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sept 30, 2007
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
|
Oct 2, 2005
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
1,452,949
|
|
|
$
|
1,303,522
|
|
|
$
|
1,135,040
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
186,159
|
|
|
|
152,285
|
|
|
|
146,362
|
|
Earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle
|
|
|
159,547
|
|
|
|
136,360
|
|
|
|
121,501
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
159,547
|
|
|
|
124,049
|
|
|
|
121,501
|
|
Cost
Method
The Company has equity interests in entities to develop
Starbucks licensed retail stores in Hong Kong, Mexico, Cyprus,
Greece, Romania and Russia. Additionally, Starbucks has
investments in privately held equity securities unrelated to
Starbucks licensed retail stores of $3 million at both
September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006. As of
September 30, 2007, and October 1, 2006, management
determined that the estimated fair values of each cost method
investment exceeded the related carrying values. There were no
realized losses recorded for other-than-temporary impairment of
the Companys cost method investments during fiscal years
2007, 2006 or 2005.
Starbucks has the ability to acquire additional interests in
some of these cost method investees at certain intervals.
Depending on the Companys total percentage of ownership
interest and its ability to exercise significant influence over
financial and operating policies, additional investments may
require the retroactive application of the equity method of
accounting.
55
|
|
Note 7:
|
Property,
Plant and Equipment
|
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost and consist
of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sept 30, 2007
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
56,238
|
|
|
$
|
32,350
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
161,730
|
|
|
|
109,129
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
3,103,121
|
|
|
|
2,436,503
|
|
Store equipment
|
|
|
1,002,289
|
|
|
|
784,444
|
|
Roasting equipment
|
|
|
208,816
|
|
|
|
197,004
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and other
|
|
|
559,077
|
|
|
|
523,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,091,271
|
|
|
|
4,082,705
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(2,416,142
|
)
|
|
|
(1,969,804
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,675,129
|
|
|
|
2,112,901
|
|
Work in progress
|
|
|
215,304
|
|
|
|
174,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
2,890,433
|
|
|
$
|
2,287,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8:
|
Other
Intangible Assets and Goodwill
|
As of September 30, 2007, indefinite-lived intangibles were
$36.9 million and definite-lived intangibles, which
collectively had a remaining weighted average useful life of
approximately eight years, were $5.1 million, net of
accumulated amortization of $4.3 million. As of
October 1, 2006, indefinite-lived intangibles were
$34.1 million and definite-lived intangibles, which
collectively had a remaining weighted average useful life of
approximately eight years, were $3.9 million, net of
accumulated amortization of $3.4 million. The increase in
indefinite-lived intangibles was primarily due to ongoing
trademark activity. Amortization expense for definite-lived
intangibles was $1.0 million, $1.2 million and
$0.8 million during fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
The following table summarizes, as of September 30, 2007,
the estimated amortization expense for each of the next five
fiscal years (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ending
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
1,203
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1,065
|
|
2010
|
|
|
601
|
|
2011
|
|
|
547
|
|
2012
|
|
|
447
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by reportable
operating segment for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2007 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
Global CPG
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance as of October 1, 2006
|
|
$
|
125,976
|
|
|
$
|
25,802
|
|
|
$
|
9,700
|
|
|
$
|
161,478
|
|
Business Acquisitions (see Note 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,289
|
|
Purchase price adjustment of previous acquisitions
|
|
|
1,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,660
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
127,636
|
|
|
$
|
78,289
|
|
|
$
|
9,700
|
|
|
$
|
215,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
United
States
The $1.7 million increase in goodwill was primarily due to
a contingent payment for the Companys fiscal 2006
acquisition of its licensed operations in Hawaii.
International
During fiscal 2007, the International segment completed a
majority stake acquisition of its licensed Beijing operations
(See Note 2) and acquired an additional equity
interest in its South China operations, which increased goodwill
by $46.2 million and $5.1 million, respectively. The
increase related to Other was due to foreign
currency fluctuations.
Revolving
Credit Facility and Commercial Paper Program
The Company has a $1 billion unsecured credit facility (the
facility) with various banks, of which
$100 million may be used for issuances of letters of
credit. The facility is available for working capital, capital
expenditures and other corporate purposes, which may include
acquisitions and share repurchases. The facility is currently
set to terminate in August 2011. The interest rate for
borrowings under the facility ranges from 0.11% to 0.27% over
LIBOR or an alternate base rate, which is the greater of the
bank prime rate or the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%. The
specific spread over LIBOR will depend upon the Companys
long-term credit ratings assigned by Moodys and Standard
and Poors rating agencies and the Companys coverage
ratio. The facility contains provisions requiring the Company to
maintain compliance with certain covenants, including a minimum
fixed charge coverage ratio which measures the Companys
ability to cover financing expenses. As of September 30,
2007 and October 1, 2006, the Company was in compliance
with each of these covenants.
As of September 30, 2007, the Company had no borrowings
under this credit facility. As of October 1, 2006, the
Company had $700 million outstanding under the facility
with a weighted average interest rate of 5.5%.
In March 2007, the Company established a commercial paper
program (the program). Under the program the Company
may issue unsecured commercial paper notes, up to a maximum
aggregate amount outstanding at any time of $1 billion,
with individual maturities that may vary, but not exceed
397 days from the date of issue. The program is backstopped
by the Companys revolving credit facility, and the
combined borrowing limit is $1 billion for the program and
the facility. The Company may issue commercial paper from time
to time, and the proceeds of the commercial paper financing will
be used for working capital, capital expenditures and other
corporate purposes, which may include acquisitions and share
repurchases.
As of September 30, 2007, the Company had $710 million
in borrowings outstanding under the program with a weighted
average interest rate of 5.4%.
As of September 30, 2007, the Company also had
$12.9 million in letters of credit outstanding under the
revolving credit facility, leaving a total of $275 million
in remaining borrowing capacity under the combined revolving
credit facility and commercial paper program. As of
October 1, 2006, a letter of credit of $11.9 million
was outstanding.
Long-term
Debt
In August 2007, the Company issued $550 million of
6.25% Senior Notes (the notes) due in August
2017, in an underwritten registered public offering. Interest is
payable semi-annually on February 15 and August 15 of each year,
commencing February 15, 2008. The notes require the Company
to maintain compliance with certain covenants, which limit
future liens and sale and leaseback transactions on certain
material properties. As of September 30, 2007, the Company
was in compliance with each of these covenants. The notes were
priced at a discount, resulting in proceeds to the Company of
$549 million, before expenses.
In 1999, Starbucks purchased the land and building comprising
its York County, Pennsylvania roasting plant and distribution
facility and assumed certain related loans from the York County
Industrial Development Corporation. As of September 30,
2007, $2.0 million remained outstanding on these loans. The
remaining maturities of these loans range from three to four
years, with interest rates from 0.0% to 2.0%.
57
Scheduled principal payments on long-term debt are as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ending
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
775
|
|
2009
|
|
|
789
|
|
2010
|
|
|
337
|
|
2011
|
|
|
56
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
550,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total principal payments
|
|
$
|
551,957
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
Expense
Interest expense, net of interest capitalized, was
$38.2 million, $8.4 million and $1.3 million in
fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. In fiscal 2007 and
2006, $3.9 million and $2.7 million, respectively, of
interest was capitalized for new store construction and included
in Property, plant and equipment, net, on the
consolidated balance sheet. No interest was capitalized in
fiscal 2005.
|
|
Note 10:
|
Other
Long-term Liabilities
|
The Companys other long-term liabilities consist of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sept 30, 2007
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
|
Deferred rent
|
|
$
|
271,736
|
|
|
$
|
203,903
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
43,670
|
|
|
|
34,271
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
17,252
|
|
|
|
10,739
|
|
Other
|
|
|
21,416
|
|
|
|
13,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
354,074
|
|
|
$
|
262,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred rent liabilities represent amounts for tenant
improvement allowances, rent escalation clauses and rent
holidays related to certain operating leases. The Company
amortizes deferred rent over the terms of the leases as
reductions to rent expense on the consolidated statements of
earnings.
Asset retirement obligations represent the estimated fair value
of the Companys future costs of removing leasehold
improvements at the termination of leases for certain stores and
administrative facilities.
Minority interest represents the collective ownership interests
of minority shareholders for operations accounted for under the
consolidation method, in which Starbucks owns less than 100% of
the equity interest.
The other remaining long-term liabilities generally include
obligations to be settled or paid for one year beyond each
period presented, for items such as hedging instruments,
guarantees, the long-term portion of capital lease obligations
and donation commitments.
Rental expense under operating lease agreements was as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sept 30, 2007
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
|
Oct 2, 2005
|
|
|
Minimum rentals retail stores
|
|
$
|
527,877
|
|
|
$
|
406,329
|
|
|
$
|
340,474
|
|
Minimum rentals other
|
|
|
59,286
|
|
|
|
52,367
|
|
|
|
43,532
|
|
Contingent rentals
|
|
|
50,966
|
|
|
|
40,113
|
|
|
|
32,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
638,129
|
|
|
$
|
498,809
|
|
|
$
|
416,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58
Minimum future rental payments under noncancelable operating
leases as of September 30, 2007, are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ending
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
691,011
|
|
2009
|
|
|
671,080
|
|
2010
|
|
|
629,696
|
|
2011
|
|
|
582,509
|
|
2012
|
|
|
526,684
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,915,603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
5,016,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has subleases related to certain of its operating
leases. During fiscal 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Company
recognized sublease income of $3.6 million,
$5.7 million and $4.3 million, respectively.
The Company had capital lease obligations of $3.1 million
and $4.1 million as of September 30, 2007 and
October 1, 2006, respectively. As of September 30,
2007, the $1.2 million current portion of the total
obligation was included in Other accrued expenses
and the remaining long-term portion of $1.9 million was
included in Other long-term liabilities on the
consolidated balance sheet. Capital lease obligations expire at
various dates, with the latest maturity in 2020. Assets held
under capital leases are included in Property, plant and
equipment, net, on the consolidated balance sheets.
|
|
Note 12:
|
Shareholders
Equity
|
In addition to 1.2 billion shares of authorized common
stock with $0.001 par value per share, the Company has
authorized 7.5 million shares of preferred stock, none of
which was outstanding at September 30, 2007.
Under the Companys authorized share repurchase program,
Starbucks acquired 33.0 million shares at an average price
of $30.72 for a total accrual-based cost of $1.0 billion in
fiscal 2007. The related cash amount used to repurchase shares
in fiscal 2007 totaled $997 million. The difference between
the two amounts represents the effect of the net change in
unsettled trades totaling $16 million from October 1,
2006. Starbucks acquired 25.6 million shares at an average
price of $32.34 for a total accrual-based cost of
$828 million during fiscal 2006. The related cash amount
used to repurchase shares in fiscal 2006 totaled
$854 million. The difference between the two amounts
represents the effect of the net change in unsettled trades
totaling $26 million from October 2, 2005. Share
repurchases were funded through cash, cash equivalents,
available-for-sale securities, borrowings under the revolving
credit facility and commercial paper program and proceeds from
sale of the notes, and were part of the Companys active
capital management program. On May 1, 2007, the Starbucks
Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to
25 million additional shares of the Companys common
stock. As of September 30, 2007, a total of up to
13.5 million shares remained available for repurchase,
under the current authorization.
Comprehensive
Income
Comprehensive income includes all changes in equity during the
period, except those resulting from transactions with
shareholders and subsidiaries of the Company. It has two
components: net earnings and other comprehensive income.
Accumulated other comprehensive income reported on the
Companys consolidated balance sheets consists of foreign
currency translation adjustments and the unrealized gains and
losses, net of applicable taxes, on available-for-sale
securities and on derivative instruments designated and
qualifying as cash flow and net investment hedges.
59
Comprehensive income, net of related tax effects, is as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sept 30, 2007
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
|
Oct 2, 2005
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
672,638
|
|
|
$
|
564,259
|
|
|
$
|
494,370
|
|
Unrealized holding gains/(losses) on available-for-sale
securities, net of tax benefit/(provision) of ($152), ($1,298)
and $889 in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
2,164
|
|
|
|
(1,482
|
)
|
Unrealized holding losses on cash flow hedging instruments, net
of tax benefit of $7,489, $1,646 and $2,268 in 2007, 2006 and
2005, respectively
|
|
|
(12,751
|
)
|
|
|
(2,803
|
)
|
|
|
(3,861
|
)
|
Unrealized holding gains/(losses) on net investment hedging
instruments, net of tax benefit/(provision) of $5,175, ($21) and
($609) in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively
|
|
|
(8,812
|
)
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for net (gains)/losses realized in
net earnings for available-for-sale securities, net of tax
provision/(benefit) of ($1), $1,060 and ($812) in 2007, 2006 and
2005, respectively
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1,767
|
)
|
|
|
1,354
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for net losses realized in net
earnings for cash flow hedges, net of tax benefit of $545,
$2,430 and $1,939 in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively
|
|
|
928
|
|
|
|
4,138
|
|
|
|
3,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gain/(loss)
|
|
|
(20,380
|
)
|
|
|
1,767
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
Translation adjustment, net of tax provision of $12, $1,794 and
$5,482 in 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively
|
|
|
37,727
|
|
|
|
14,592
|
|
|
|
(8,677
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
689,985
|
|
|
$
|
580,618
|
|
|
$
|
486,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The favorable translation adjustment change during fiscal 2007
of $37.7 million was primarily due to the weakening of the
U.S. dollar against several currencies including the euro,
Canadian dollar and British pound sterling. The favorable
translation adjustment change during fiscal 2006 of
$14.6 million was primarily due to the weakening of the
U.S. dollar against several currencies including British
pound sterling, the euro and Canadian dollar. The unfavorable
translation adjustment change during fiscal 2005 of
$8.7 million was primarily due to the strengthening of the
U.S. dollar against the euro, British pound sterling and
Japanese yen.
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of
tax, were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sept 30, 2007
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
|
Net unrealized holding gains/(losses) on available-for-sale
securities
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
(254
|
)
|
Net unrealized holding (losses) on hedging instruments
|
|
|
(27,051
|
)
|
|
|
(6,416
|
)
|
Translation adjustment
|
|
|
81,670
|
|
|
|
43,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
54,620
|
|
|
$
|
37,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007, the translation adjustment of
$81.7 million was net of tax provisions of
$7.3 million. As of October 1, 2006, the translation
adjustment of $43.9 million was net of tax provisions of
$7.3 million.
|
|
Note 13:
|
Employee
Stock and Benefit Plans
|
The Company maintains several equity incentive plans under which
it may grant non-qualified stock options, incentive stock
options, restricted stock, RSUs, or stock appreciation rights to
employees, non-employee directors and consultants. The Company
issues new shares of common stock upon exercise of stock options
and the vesting of RSUs. As of September 30, 2007, there
were 59.1 million shares of common stock available for
issuance pursuant to future equity-based compensation awards.
60
The Company also has employee stock purchase plans
(ESPP).
Stock
Option Plans
Stock options to purchase the Companys common stock are
granted at the fair market value of the stock on the date of
grant. The majority of options become exercisable in four equal
installments beginning a year from the date of grant and
generally expire 10 years from the date of grant. Certain
options granted prior to October 1, 2006 become exercisable
in three equal installments beginning a year from the date of
grant. Options granted to non-employee directors generally vest
over one to three years. Nearly all outstanding stock options
are non-qualified stock options.
Prior to the October 3, 2005 adoption of the
SFAS 123R, Starbucks accounted for stock-based compensation
using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting
Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and
related interpretations. Accordingly, because the stock option
grant price equaled the market price on the date of grant, and
any purchase discounts under the Companys stock purchase
plans were within statutory limits, no compensation expense was
recognized by the Company for stock-based compensation. As
permitted by SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123),
stock-based compensation was included as a pro forma disclosure
in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
Effective October 3, 2005, the beginning of Starbucks first
fiscal quarter of 2006, the Company adopted the fair value
recognition provisions of SFAS 123R, using the
modified-prospective transition method. Under this transition
method, stock-based compensation expense was recognized in the
consolidated financial statements for granted, modified, or
settled stock options and RSUs and for expense related to the
ESPP, since the related purchase discounts exceeded the amount
allowed under SFAS 123R for non-compensatory treatment.
Compensation expense recognized included the estimated expense
for stock options granted on and subsequent to October 3,
2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance
with the provisions of SFAS 123R, and the estimated expense
for the portion vesting in the period for options granted prior
to, but not vested as of October 3, 2005, based on the
grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original
provisions of SFAS 123. Results for prior periods were not
restated, as provided for under the modified-prospective method.
The following table shows the effect on net earnings and
earnings per share had compensation cost been recognized based
upon the estimated fair value on the grant date of stock
options, and ESPP, in accordance with SFAS 123, as amended
by SFAS No. 148 Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation Transition and Disclosure (in
thousands, except earnings per share):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Oct 2, 2005
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
494,370
|
|
Deduct: stock-based compensation expense determined under fair
value method, net of tax
|
|
|
(58,742
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net earnings
|
|
$
|
435,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
Basic as reported
|
|
$
|
0.63
|
|
Deduct: stock-based compensation expense determined under fair
value method, net of tax
|
|
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic pro forma
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted as reported
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
Deduct: stock-based compensation expense determined under fair
value method, net of tax
|
|
|
(0.08
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted pro forma
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disclosures for the years ended September 30, 2007 and
October 1, 2006 are not presented because the amounts are
recognized in the consolidated financial statements.
61
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, Starbucks presented all
tax benefits resulting from the exercise of stock options as
operating cash inflows on the consolidated statements of cash
flows, in accordance with the provisions of the Emerging Issues
Task Force (EITF) Issue No
00-15,
Classification in the Statement of Cash Flows of the
Income Tax Benefit Received by a Company upon Exercise of a
Nonqualified Employee Stock Option. SFAS 123R
requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of the tax
effect of the compensation cost recognized for those options to
be classified as financing cash inflows rather than operating
cash inflows, on a prospective basis. This amount is shown as
Excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options on
the consolidated statements of cash flows.
For option grants made in November 2003 and thereafter, the
Company may provide for immediate vesting upon retirement for
optionees who have attained at least 10 years of service
and are age 55 or older. Prior to adoption of
SFAS 123R, the Company amortized the expense over the
related vesting period with acceleration of expense upon
retirement. With the adoption of SFAS 123R, the accounting
treatment for retirement features changed. Expense for awards
made prior to adoption of SFAS 123R is still amortized over
the vesting period until retirement, at which point any
remaining unrecognized expense is immediately recognized. For
awards made on or after October 3, 2005, the related
expense is recognized either from grant date through the date
the employee reaches the years of service and age requirements,
or from grant date through the stated vesting period, whichever
is shorter.
The fair value of each stock option granted is estimated on the
grant date using the Black-Scholes-Merton (BSM)
option valuation model. The assumptions used to calculate the
fair value of options granted are evaluated and revised, as
necessary, to reflect market conditions and the Companys
experience. Options granted are valued using the multiple option
valuation approach, and the resulting expense is recognized
using the graded, or accelerated, attribution method, consistent
with the multiple option valuation approach. Compensation
expense is recognized only for those options expected to vest,
with forfeitures estimated at the date of grant based on the
Companys historical experience and future expectations.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R, the effect of
forfeitures on the pro forma expense amounts was recognized as
the forfeitures occurred.
The following represents total stock based compensation expense
recognized in the consolidated financial statements (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sept 30, 2007
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
|
Stock option expense
|
|
$
|
92.3
|
|
|
$
|
94.8
|
|
ESPP expense
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense on the consolidated
statements of earnings
|
|
|
103.9
|
|
|
|
105.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total related tax benefit
|
|
|
35.3
|
|
|
|
36.1
|
|
Stock-based compensation capitalized in the current fiscal year,
as included in Property, plant and equipment, net
and Inventories on the consolidated balance sheets
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
The fair value of stock awards was estimated at the grant date
with the following weighted average assumptions for the
52 weeks ended September 30, 2007, October 1,
2006 and October 2, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted During the Period
|
|
|
ESPP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(Pro Forma)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
(Pro Forma)
|
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
0.25 - 0.5
|
|
0.25 - 3.0
|
|
0.25 - 3.0
|
Expected stock price volatility
|
|
|
28.9
|
%
|
|
|
28.9
|
%
|
|
|
33.0
|
%
|
|
28% - 31%
|
|
22% - 50%
|
|
20% - 40%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
4.7% - 5.1%
|
|
2.3% - 5.0%
|
|
1.9% - 3.5%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
0.0%
|
|
0.0%
|
|
0.0%
|
Estimated fair value per option granted
|
|
$
|
11.72
|
|
|
$
|
9.59
|
|
|
$
|
8.10
|
|
|
$6.03
|
|
$6.60
|
|
$5.05
|
62
The expected term of the options represents the estimated period
of time until exercise and is based on historical experience of
similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms,
vesting schedules and expectations of future employee behavior.
For fiscal years 2007 and 2006, expected stock price volatility
is based on a combination of historical volatility of the
Companys stock and the one-year implied volatility of its
traded options, for the related vesting periods. Prior to the
adoption of SFAS 123R, expected stock price volatility was
estimated using only historical volatility. The risk-free
interest rate is based on the implied yield available on
U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with an equivalent
remaining term. The Company has not paid dividends in the past
and does not plan to pay any dividends in the near future.
The BSM option valuation model was developed for use in
estimating the fair value of traded options, which have no
vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition,
option valuation models require the input of subjective
assumptions, particularly for the expected term and expected
stock price volatility. The Companys employee stock
options have characteristics significantly different from those
of traded options, and changes in the subjective input
assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate.
Because Company stock options do not trade on a secondary
exchange, employees do not derive a benefit from holding stock
options unless there is an increase, above the grant price, in
the market price of the Companys stock. Such an increase
in stock price would benefit all shareholders commensurately.
The following summarizes all stock option transactions from
October 3, 2004, through September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Subject to
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Life (Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Outstanding, October 3, 2004
|
|
|
76,833,220
|
|
|
$
|
9.52
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,082,324
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
15,627,550
|
|
|
|
27.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(16,169,992
|
)
|
|
|
8.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/forfeited
|
|
|
(3,831,872
|
)
|
|
|
17.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, October 2, 2005
|
|
|
72,458,906
|
|
|
|
13.22
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
857,319
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
13,357,095
|
|
|
|
30.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(13,222,729
|
)
|
|
|
9.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/forfeited
|
|
|
(3,173,401
|
)
|
|
|
24.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, October 1, 2006
|
|
|
69,419,871
|
|
|
|
16.83
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
1,196,209
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
12,298,465
|
|
|
|
36.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(12,744,226
|
)
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/forfeited
|
|
|
(3,458,007
|
)
|
|
|
30.92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, September 30, 2007
|
|
|
65,516,103
|
|
|
|
20.97
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
507,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, September 30, 2007
|
|
|
40,438,082
|
|
|
|
14.65
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
488,898
|
|
Vested and expected to vest, September 30, 2007
|
|
|
63,681,867
|
|
|
|
20.60
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
507,489
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above is the amount
by which the market value of the underlying stock exceeded the
exercise price of outstanding options, is before applicable
income taxes and represents the amount optionees would have
realized if all in-the-money options had been exercised on the
last business day of the period indicated. As of
September 30, 2007, total unrecognized stock-based
compensation expense related to nonvested stock options was
approximately $103 million, before income taxes, and is
expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
approximately 24 months. The total intrinsic value of stock
options exercised was $274 million and $327 million
during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 and
October 1, 2006 respectively. The total fair value of
options vested was $28 million and $95 million during
fiscal years 2007 and 2006, respectively.
63
Restricted
Stock Units
In fiscal 2007 the Company granted service-based RSUs to certain
of its senior executives. The fair values of the RSUs are based
on the fair value of common stock. RSUs entitle the grantee to
receive shares of common stock at the end of a vesting period,
subject to the executives continuing employment. As of
September 30, 2007, there were 0.2 million RSUs
outstanding and total unrecognized stock-based compensation
expense related to nonvested RSUs of approximately
$5 million, before income taxes, which is expected to be
recognized over a weighted average period of approximately
36 months.
Employee
Stock Purchase Plans
The Company has an ESPP allowing eligible employees to
contribute up to 10% of their base earnings toward the quarterly
purchase of the Companys common stock. The employees
purchase price is 85% of the lesser of the fair market value of
the stock on the first business day or the last business day of
the quarterly offering period. Employees may purchase shares
having a fair market value of up to $25,000 (measured as of the
first day of each quarterly offering period for each calendar
year). The total number of shares issuable under the plan is
32.0 million. There were 1.9 million shares issued
under the plan during the fiscal year ended September 30,
2007 at an average price of $24.59. There were 1.5 million
shares issued under the plan during the fiscal year ended
October 1, 2006 at an average price of $26.81. There were
1.5 million shares issued under the plan during the fiscal
year ended October 2, 2005 at an average price of $21.27.
Since inception of the plan, 18.2 million shares have been
purchased, leaving 13.8 million shares available for future
issuance.
Starbucks had an additional employee stock purchase plan in the
United Kingdom (SAYE plan) that allowed eligible UK
employees to save toward the purchase of the Companys
common stock. The final offering under the plan was made in
fiscal 2003 and final purchase in fiscal 2006. In fiscal 2004,
the UK Share Incentive Plan was introduced to replace the SAYE
plan. This plan allows eligible UK employees to purchase shares
of common stock through payroll deductions during six-month
offering periods at the lesser of the fair market value of the
stock at the beginning or at the end of the offering period. The
Company will award one matching share for each six shares
purchased under the plan. The total number of shares issuable
under the plan is 1.4 million. There were
13,814 shares issued under the plan during the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2007 at an average price of $33.56.
There were 11,138 shares issued under the plan during the
fiscal year ended October 1, 2006 at an average price of
$26.42. There were 10,732 shares issued under the plan
during the fiscal year ended October 2, 2005 at an average
price of $22.08. As of September 30, 2007,
1.36 million shares were available for future issuance.
Deferred
Stock Plan
Starbucks has a deferred stock plan for certain key employees
that enables participants in the plan to defer receipt of
ownership of common shares from the exercise of nonqualified
stock options. The minimum deferral period is five years. As of
September 30, 2007, receipt of 3.4 million shares was
deferred under the terms of this plan. The rights to receive
these shares, represented by common stock units, are included in
the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share as
common stock equivalents. No new initial deferrals are permitted
under this plan; the plan permits re-deferrals of previously
deferred shares.
Defined
Contribution Plans
Starbucks maintains voluntary defined contribution plans, both
qualified and non-qualified, covering eligible employees as
defined in the plan documents. Participating employees may elect
to defer and contribute a portion of their compensation to the
plans up to limits stated in the plan documents, not to exceed
the dollar amounts set by applicable laws. For employees in the
United States, the Company matched 25% to 150% of each
employees eligible contribution based on years of service,
up to a maximum of the first 4% of each employees
compensation. The Companys matching contributions to all
U.S. and
non-U.S. plans
were approximately $20.1 million, $19.3 million and
$12.4 million in fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
64
A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate with
the Companys effective income tax rate is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sept 30, 2007
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
|
Oct 2, 2005
|
|
|
Statutory rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
36.3
|
%
|
|
|
35.8
|
%
|
|
|
37.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes consists of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sept 30, 2007
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
|
Oct 2, 2005
|
|
|
Current taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
326,725
|
|
|
$
|
332,202
|
|
|
$
|
273,178
|
|
State
|
|
|
65,308
|
|
|
|
57,759
|
|
|
|
51,949
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
31,181
|
|
|
|
12,398
|
|
|
|
14,106
|
|
Deferred taxes, net
|
|
|
(39,488
|
)
|
|
|
(77,589
|
)
|
|
|
(37,256
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
383,726
|
|
|
$
|
324,770
|
|
|
$
|
301,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. income and foreign withholding taxes have not been
provided on approximately $284.2 million of cumulative
undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries and equity
investees. The Company intends to reinvest these earnings for
the foreseeable future. If these amounts were distributed to the
United States, in the form of dividends or otherwise, the
Company would be subject to additional U.S. income taxes.
Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred income tax
liabilities on these earnings is not practicable because such
liability, if any, is dependent on circumstances existing if and
when remittance occurs.
The tax effect of temporary differences and carryforwards that
comprise significant portions of deferred tax assets and
liabilities is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sept 30, 2007
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued occupancy costs
|
|
$
|
47,611
|
|
|
$
|
36,205
|
|
Accrued compensation and related costs
|
|
|
131,882
|
|
|
|
90,815
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
42,022
|
|
|
|
34,959
|
|
Foreign tax credits
|
|
|
11,137
|
|
|
|
20,948
|
|
Other
|
|
|
29,159
|
|
|
|
19,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
261,811
|
|
|
|
202,022
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(13,658
|
)
|
|
|
(8,767
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax asset, net of valuation allowance
|
|
|
248,153
|
|
|
|
193,255
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(8,070
|
)
|
|
|
(12,759
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(23,867
|
)
|
|
|
(16,249
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(31,937
|
)
|
|
|
(29,008
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
216,216
|
|
|
$
|
164,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company will establish a valuation allowance if it is more
likely than not that these items will either expire before the
Company is able to realize their benefits, or that future
deductibility is uncertain. Periodically, the valuation
allowance is reviewed and adjusted based on managements
assessments of realizable deferred tax assets. The valuation
allowance as of September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006
was related to net operating losses of
65
consolidated foreign subsidiaries. The net change in the total
valuation allowance for the years ended September 30, 2007,
and October 1, 2006, was an increase of $4.9 million
and $0.7 million, respectively.
As of September 30, 2007, the Company has foreign tax
credit carryforwards of $11.1 million with expiration dates
between fiscal years 2012 and 2014. As of the end of fiscal
2007, the Company also has capital loss carryforwards of
$0.7 million, expiring in fiscal year 2010.
Taxes currently payable of $38.5 million and
$50.6 million are included in Accrued taxes on
the consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2007
and October 1, 2006, respectively.
The Company has established, and periodically reviews and
re-evaluates, estimated contingent tax liabilities to provide
for the possibility of unfavorable outcomes in tax matters.
Contingent tax liabilities totaled $25.9 million and
$27.6 million as of September 30, 2007 and
October 1, 2006, respectively, and are included in
Accrued taxes on the consolidated balance sheets.
These liabilities are provided for in accordance with the
requirements of SFAS 5. The Company believes its contingent
tax liabilities are adequate in the event the tax positions are
not ultimately upheld.
The Company will adopt FIN 48 in its first fiscal quarter
of 2008. See Note 1 for additional information.
|
|
Note 15:
|
Earnings
per Share
|
The following table represents the calculation of net earnings
per common share basic and diluted (in thousands,
except earnings per share):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sept 30, 2007
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
|
Oct 2, 2005
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
672,638
|
|
|
$
|
564,259
|
|
|
$
|
494,370
|
|
Weighted average common shares and common stock units
outstanding (for basic calculation)
|
|
|
749,763
|
|
|
|
766,114
|
|
|
|
789,570
|
|
Dilutive effect of outstanding common stock options
|
|
|
20,328
|
|
|
|
26,442
|
|
|
|
25,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding
(for diluted calculation)
|
|
|
770,091
|
|
|
|
792,556
|
|
|
|
815,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per common share basic
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
$
|
0.74
|
|
|
$
|
0.63
|
|
Net earnings per common and common equivalent share
diluted
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
Potential dilutive shares consist of the incremental common
shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options
(both vested and non-vested) and unvested RSUs using the
treasury stock method. Potential dilutive shares are excluded
from the computation of earnings per share if their effect is
antidilutive. The number of antidilutive options and RSUs
totaled 10.4 million, 10.3 million and
13.7 million in fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
|
|
Note 16:
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
In April 2001, certain members of the Board of Directors and
other investors, organized as The Basketball Club of Seattle,
LLC (The Basketball Club), purchased the franchises
for The Seattle Supersonics and The Seattle Storm basketball
teams. An executive officer of the Company and member of the
Board of Directors, Howard Schultz, owned a controlling interest
in The Basketball Club, until the franchises were sold to an
unrelated third party in October 2006. Starbucks paid no amounts
in fiscal 2007 and approximately $0.6 million and
$0.8 million during fiscal years 2006 and 2005,
respectively, for team sponsorships and ticket purchases during
the time when Mr. Schultz owned a controlling interest in
The Basketball Club. Terms of the team sponsorship agreements
did not change as a result of the related party relationship.
In June 2005, a then-member of the Companys Board of
Directors was appointed president and chief financial officer of
Oracle Corporation. Starbucks had a pre-existing business
relationship with Oracle related to financial systems and
systems consulting at the time of the appointment and Starbucks
continued to make payments for supplies and services subsequent
to June 2005 in the ordinary course of business. These payments
totaled
66
approximately $2.7 million from the inception of the
related party relationship in fiscal 2005 through
November 15, 2005 when the former Board members
employment relationship with Oracle ended.
|
|
Note 17:
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Guarantees
The Company has unconditionally guaranteed the repayment of
certain Japanese yen-denominated bank loans and related interest
and fees of an unconsolidated equity investee, Starbucks Japan.
The guarantees continue until the loans, including accrued
interest and fees, have been paid in full, with the final loan
amount due in 2014. The maximum amount is limited to the sum of
unpaid principal and interest amounts, as well as other related
expenses. These amounts will vary based on fluctuations in the
yen foreign exchange rate. As of September 30, 2007, the
maximum amount of the guarantees was approximately
$4.9 million. Since there has been no modification of these
loan guarantees subsequent to the Companys adoption of
FASB Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors
Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including
Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, Starbucks
has applied the disclosure provisions only and has not recorded
the guarantee on its consolidated balance sheet.
Starbucks has commitments under which it unconditionally
guarantees its proportionate share of certain borrowings of
unconsolidated equity investees. The Companys maximum
exposure under these commitments is approximately
$12.9 million, excluding interest and other related costs,
and these commitments expire between 2008 and 2012. As of
September 30, 2007, the Company had a total of
$3.1 million in Equity and other investments
and Other long-term liabilities on the consolidated
balance sheet for the fair value of the guarantee arrangements.
Legal
Proceedings
On June 3, 2004, two then-current employees of the Company
filed a lawsuit, entitled Sean Pendlebury and Laurel
Overton v. Starbucks Coffee Company, in the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida
claiming the Company violated requirements of the Fair Labor
Standards Act (FLSA). The suit alleges that the
Company misclassified its retail store managers as exempt from
the overtime provisions of the FLSA, and that each manager
therefore is entitled to overtime compensation for any week in
which he or she worked more than 40 hours during the three
years before joining the suit as a plaintiff, and for as long as
they remain a manager thereafter. Plaintiffs seek to represent
themselves and all similarly situated U.S. current and
former store managers of the Company. Plaintiffs seek
reimbursement for an unspecified amount of unpaid overtime
compensation, liquidated damages, attorneys fees and
costs. Plaintiffs also filed on June 3, 2004 a motion for
conditional collective action treatment and court-supervised
notice to additional putative class members under the opt-in
procedures in section 16(b) of the FLSA. On January 3,
2005, the district court entered an order authorizing nationwide
notice of the lawsuit to all current and former store managers
employed by the Company during the three years before the suit
was filed. The Companys motion for summary judgment is
pending before the court. Starbucks believes that the plaintiffs
are properly classified as exempt under the federal wage laws.
The Company cannot estimate the possible loss to the Company, if
any, and believes that a loss in this case is unlikely. There is
currently no trial date. The Company intends to vigorously
defend the lawsuit.
On October 8, 2004, a former hourly employee of the Company
filed a lawsuit in San Diego County Superior Court entitled
Jou Chau v. Starbucks Coffee Company. The lawsuit
alleges that the Company violated the California Labor Code by
allowing shift supervisors to receive tips. More specifically,
the lawsuit alleges that since shift supervisors direct the work
of baristas, they qualify as agents of the Company
and are therefore excluded from receiving tips under California
Labor Code Section 351, which prohibits employers and their
agents from collecting or receiving tips left by patrons for
other employees. The lawsuit further alleges that because the
tipping practices violate the Labor Code, they also are unfair
practices under the California Unfair Competition Law. In
addition to recovery of an unspecified amount of tips
distributed to shift supervisors, the lawsuit seeks penalties
under California Labor Code Section 203 for willful failure
to pay wages due. Plaintiff also seeks attorneys fees and
costs. On March 30, 2006, the Court issued an order
certifying the case as a class action, with the plaintiff
representing a class of all persons employed as baristas in the
state of California since October 8, 2000. In March 2007,
notice of action was sent to approximately 120,000 potential
members of the class. The Company cannot estimate the possible
loss to the
67
Company, if any. Trial is currently set for February 2008. The
Company believes its practices comply with California law, and
the Company intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit.
On March 11, 2005, a former employee of the Company filed a
lawsuit, entitled James Falcon v. Starbucks Corporation
and Does 1 through 100, in the U.S. District Court for
the Southern District of Texas claiming that the Company
violated requirements of the FLSA. Specifically, the plaintiff
claims that the Company misclassified its retail assistant store
managers as exempt from the overtime provisions of the FLSA and
that each assistant manager therefore is entitled to overtime
compensation for any week in which he or she worked more than
40 hours during the three years before joining the suit as
a plaintiff, and for as long as they remain an assistant manager
thereafter. On August 18, 2005, the plaintiff amended his
complaint to include allegations that he and other retail
assistant store managers were not paid overtime compensation for
all hours worked in excess of 40 hours in a work week after
they were re-classified as non-exempt employees in September
2002. In both claims, Plaintiff seeks to represent himself and a
putative class of all current and former assistant store
managers employed by the Company in the United States from
March 11, 2002 until the present. He also seeks, on behalf
of himself and the class, reimbursement for an unspecified
amount of unpaid overtime compensation, liquidated damages,
injunctive relief, and attorneys fees and costs. On
September 13, 2005, the plaintiff filed a motion for
conditional collective action treatment and court-supervised
notice to all putative class members under the opt-in procedures
in section 16(b) of the FLSA. On November 29, 2005,
the court entered an order authorizing notice to the class of
the existence of the lawsuit and their opportunity to join as
plaintiffs. The Company has a policy requiring that all
non-exempt partners, including assistant store managers, be paid
for all hours worked, including any hours worked in excess of 40
per week. The Company also believes that this policy is, and at
all relevant times has been, communicated and followed
consistently. Further, the Company believes that the plaintiff
and other assistant store managers were properly classified as
exempt under the FLSA prior to September 2002. The Company
cannot estimate the possible loss to the Company, if any, and
believes that a loss in this case is unlikely. Trial is
currently set for February 2008. The Company intends to
vigorously defend the lawsuit.
On June 30, 2005, three individuals, Erik Lords, Hon Yeung,
and Donald Brown filed a lawsuit in Orange County Superior
Court, California. The lawsuit alleges that the Company violated
the California Labor Code section 432.8 by asking job
applicants to disclose at the time of application convictions
for marijuana related offenses more than two years old.
Plaintiffs also seek attorneys fees and costs. On
November 1, 2007, the Court issued an order certifying the
case as a class action, with the plaintiffs representing a class
of all persons who have applied for employment with Starbucks
Coffee Company in California since June 23, 2004 who cannot
claim damages in excess of $200. The Company cannot estimate the
possible loss to the Company, if any. No trial date has been
set. The Company believes its employment application complies
with California law, and the Company intends to vigorously
defend the lawsuit.
The Company is party to various other legal proceedings arising
in the ordinary course of its business, but it is not currently
a party to any legal proceeding that management believes would
have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial
position or results of operations of the Company.
|
|
Note 18:
|
Segment
Reporting
|
Segment information is prepared on the same basis that the
Companys management reviews financial information for
operational decision making purposes. Starbucks has three
reportable operating segments: United States, International and
CPG.
United
States
The Companys United States operations represent 82% of
total Company-operated retail revenues, 56% of total specialty
revenues and 78% of total net revenues for fiscal year 2007.
United States operations sell coffee and other beverages,
complementary food, whole bean coffees, and coffee brewing
equipment and merchandise primarily through Company-operated
retail stores. Specialty Operations within the United States
include licensed retail stores, foodservice accounts and other
initiatives related to the Companys core business.
68
International
The Companys International operations represent the
remaining 18% of Company-operated retail revenues and 18% of
total specialty revenues as well as 18% of total net revenues
for fiscal year 2007. International operations sell coffee and
other beverages, complementary food, whole bean coffees, and
coffee brewing equipment and merchandise through
Company-operated retail stores in the UK, Canada and eight other
markets. Specialty Operations in International primarily include
retail store licensing operations in more than 30 countries and
foodservice accounts, primarily in Canada and the UK. Many of
the Companys International operations are in early stages
of development that require a more extensive support
organization, relative to the current levels of revenue and
operating income, than in the United States.
Global
Consumer Products Group
The Companys CPG segment represents 26% of total specialty
revenues and 4% of total net revenues for fiscal year 2007. CPG
operations sell a selection of whole bean and ground coffees as
well as a selection of premium
Tazo®
teas through licensing arrangements in United States and
international markets. CPG operations also produce and sell
ready-to-drink beverages which include, among others, bottled
Frappuccino®
beverages, Starbucks
DoubleShot®
espresso drinks, and
Discoveries®
chilled cup coffee, as well as
Starbucks®
superpremium ice creams and
Starbuckstm
Coffee and Cream Liqueurs, through its joint ventures and
marketing and distribution agreements.
Unallocated Corporate includes expenses pertaining to corporate
administrative functions that support the operating segments but
are not specifically attributable to or managed by any segment
and are not included in the reported financial results of the
operating segments. These unallocated corporate expenses include
certain general and administrative expenses, related
depreciation and amortization expenses and amounts included in
Net interest and other income on the consolidated
statements of earnings.
Management evaluates the performance of its operating segments
based on net revenues and operating income. The accounting
policies of the operating segments are the same as those
described in the summary of significant accounting policies in
Note 1. Operating income represents earnings before
Net interest and other income and Income
taxes. Allocations of portions of corporate overhead,
interest or income taxes to the segments are not significant.
Identifiable assets by segment are those assets used in the
Companys operations in each segment. Unallocated corporate
assets include cash and investments, unallocated assets of the
corporate headquarters and roasting facilities, deferred taxes
and certain other intangibles.
69
The table below presents information by operating segment for
the fiscal years noted (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
Global CPG
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fiscal 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-operated retail
|
|
$
|
6,560,864
|
|
|
$
|
1,437,401
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,998,265
|
|
Specialty:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
439,161
|
|
|
|
220,832
|
|
|
|
366,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,026,338
|
|
Foodservice and other
|
|
|
348,968
|
|
|
|
37,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
386,894
|
|
Total specialty
|
|
|
788,129
|
|
|
|
258,758
|
|
|
|
366,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,413,232
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
|
7,348,993
|
|
|
|
1,696,159
|
|
|
|
366,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,411,497
|
|
Operating income/(loss)
|
|
|
1,070,515
|
|
|
|
137,743
|
|
|
|
183,553
|
|
|
|
(337,866
|
)
|
|
|
1,053,945
|
|
Earnings/(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
1,079,684
|
|
|
|
147,221
|
|
|
|
183,553
|
|
|
|
(354,094
|
)
|
|
|
1,056,364
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
348,199
|
|
|
|
84,165
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
34,720
|
|
|
|
467,160
|
|
Income from equity investees
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
45,723
|
|
|
|
61,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,006
|
|
Equity method investments
|
|
|
772
|
|
|
|
196,940
|
|
|
|
36,756
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
234,468
|
|
Identifiable assets
|
|
|
2,454,619
|
|
|
|
1,116,054
|
|
|
|
91,614
|
|
|
|
1,681,591
|
|
|
|
5,343,878
|
|
Net impairment and disposition losses
|
|
|
9,291
|
|
|
|
15,092
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1,647
|
|
|
|
26,032
|
|
Net capital expenditures
|
|
|
779,270
|
|
|
|
189,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,305
|
|
|
|
1,080,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-operated retail
|
|
$
|
5,495,240
|
|
|
$
|
1,087,858
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,583,098
|
|
Specialty:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
369,155
|
|
|
|
186,050
|
|
|
|
305,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
860,676
|
|
Foodservice and other
|
|
|
314,162
|
|
|
|
29,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
343,168
|
|
Total specialty
|
|
|
683,317
|
|
|
|
215,056
|
|
|
|
305,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,203,844
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
|
6,178,557
|
|
|
|
1,302,914
|
|
|
|
305,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,786,942
|
|
Operating income/(loss)
|
|
|
955,176
|
|
|
|
108,468
|
|
|
|
166,918
|
|
|
|
(336,610
|
)
|
|
|
893,952
|
|
Earnings/(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
957,631
|
|
|
|
109,494
|
|
|
|
166,918
|
|
|
|
(327,800
|
)
|
|
|
906,243
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
284,625
|
|
|
|
66,800
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
35,678
|
|
|
|
387,211
|
|
Income from equity investees
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
34,370
|
|
|
|
59,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,937
|
|
Equity method investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163,566
|
|
|
|
41,438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205,004
|
|
Identifiable assets
|
|
|
1,996,295
|
|
|
|
746,398
|
|
|
|
94,160
|
|
|
|
1,592,088
|
|
|
|
4,428,941
|
|
Net impairment and disposition losses
|
|
|
9,395
|
|
|
|
10,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
19,622
|
|
Net capital expenditures
|
|
|
545,074
|
|
|
|
112,054
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
113,816
|
|
|
|
771,230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-operated retail
|
|
$
|
4,539,455
|
|
|
$
|
852,472
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,391,927
|
|
Specialty:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
277,987
|
|
|
|
145,736
|
|
|
|
249,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
673,015
|
|
Foodservice and other
|
|
|
280,073
|
|
|
|
24,285
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304,358
|
|
Total specialty
|
|
|
558,060
|
|
|
|
170,021
|
|
|
|
249,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
977,373
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
|
5,097,515
|
|
|
|
1,022,493
|
|
|
|
249,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,369,300
|
|
Operating income/(loss)
|
|
|
818,502
|
|
|
|
82,299
|
|
|
|
131,449
|
|
|
|
(251,732
|
)
|
|
|
780,518
|
|
Earnings/(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
817,815
|
|
|
|
82,465
|
|
|
|
131,449
|
|
|
|
(235,382
|
)
|
|
|
796,347
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
250,339
|
|
|
|
56,705
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
33,049
|
|
|
|
340,169
|
|
Income from equity investees
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
30,477
|
|
|
|
45,579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,648
|
|
Equity method investments
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
161,056
|
|
|
|
28,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189,876
|
|
Identifiable assets
|
|
|
1,562,973
|
|
|
|
604,577
|
|
|
|
71,549
|
|
|
|
1,274,594
|
|
|
|
3,513,693
|
|
Net impairment and disposition losses
|
|
|
13,647
|
|
|
|
4,039
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
1,791
|
|
|
|
19,464
|
|
Net capital expenditures
|
|
|
440,228
|
|
|
|
115,064
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
87,932
|
|
|
|
643,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
The tables below represent information by geographic area (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sept 30, 2007
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
|
Oct 2, 2005
|
|
|
Net revenues from external customers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
7,678,876
|
|
|
$
|
6,478,142
|
|
|
$
|
5,346,967
|
|
Other countries
|
|
|
1,732,621
|
|
|
|
1,308,800
|
|
|
|
1,022,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
9,411,497
|
|
|
$
|
7,786,942
|
|
|
$
|
6,369,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No customer accounts for 10% or more of the Companys
revenues. Revenues are shown based on the geographic location of
the customers. Revenues from countries other than the United
States consist primarily of revenues from the UK and Canada,
which together account for approximately 71% of net revenues
from other countries for fiscal 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sept 30, 2007
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
|
Oct 2, 2005
|
|
|
Long-lived assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
2,990,655
|
|
|
$
|
2,446,126
|
|
|
$
|
1,914,846
|
|
Other countries
|
|
|
667,873
|
|
|
|
453,027
|
|
|
|
389,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,658,528
|
|
|
$
|
2,899,153
|
|
|
$
|
2,304,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 19:
|
Quarterly
Financial Information (unaudited)
|
Summarized quarterly financial information in fiscal 2007 and
2006 is as follows (in thousands, except earnings per
share):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2007 quarter:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
2,355,723
|
|
|
$
|
2,255,594
|
|
|
$
|
2,359,245
|
|
|
$
|
2,440,935
|
|
|
$
|
9,411,497
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
319,724
|
|
|
|
240,974
|
|
|
|
245,214
|
|
|
|
248,033
|
|
|
|
1,053,945
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
204,952
|
|
|
|
150,840
|
|
|
|
158,343
|
|
|
|
158,503
|
|
|
|
672,638
|
|
Net earnings per common share diluted
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
0.19
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
0.87
|
|
2006 quarter:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
1,934,092
|
|
|
$
|
1,885,822
|
|
|
$
|
1,963,673
|
|
|
$
|
2,003,355
|
|
|
$
|
7,786,942
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
279,847
|
|
|
|
201,894
|
|
|
|
214,573
|
|
|
|
197,638
|
|
|
|
893,952
|
|
Earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle
|
|
|
174,156
|
|
|
|
127,316
|
|
|
|
145,498
|
|
|
|
134,503
|
|
|
|
581,473
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change for FIN 47, net of
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,214
|
|
|
|
17,214
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
174,156
|
|
|
|
127,316
|
|
|
|
145,498
|
|
|
|
117,289
|
|
|
|
564,259
|
|
Earnings per common share before cumulative effect of accounting
change for FIN 47 diluted
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
0.73
|
|
Net earnings per common share diluted
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
71
AUDITORS
REPORT ON CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Starbucks
Corporation
Seattle, Washington
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Starbucks Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company)
as of September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006, and the
related consolidated statements of earnings, shareholders
equity, and cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the
period ended September 30, 2007. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Starbucks Corporation and subsidiaries as of September 30,
2007 and October 1, 2006, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended September 30, 2007, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, on October 1, 2006, the Company changed its
method of accounting for conditional asset retirement
obligations upon adoption of Financial Accounting Standards
Board Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for
Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations - an interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 143. As discussed in Note 13,
on October 3, 2005, the Company changed its method of
accounting for stock-based compensation upon adoption of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
September 30, 2007, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
and our report dated November 29, 2007 expressed an
unqualified opinion on the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Seattle, Washington
November 29, 2007
72
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
Not applicable.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that
are designed to ensure that material information required to be
disclosed in the Companys periodic reports filed or
submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act), is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
SECs rules and forms. Starbucks disclosure controls and
procedures are also designed to ensure that information required
to be disclosed in the reports the Company files or submits
under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the
Companys management, including its principal executive
officer and principal financial officer as appropriate, to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
During the quarter the Company carried out an evaluation, under
the supervision and with the participation of the Companys
management, including the chief executive officer and the chief
financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of the disclosure controls and procedures, as defined
in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, the
Companys chief executive officer and chief financial
officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls
and procedures were effective, as of the end of the period
covered by this report (September 30, 2007).
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, there were no changes
in the Companys internal control over financial reporting
(as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f) of
the Exchange Act) that materially affected or are reasonably
likely to materially affect internal control over financial
reporting.
The certifications required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are filed as exhibits 31.1 and
31.2, respectively, to this
Form 10-K.
Report of
Management on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
The management of Starbucks is responsible for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.
Internal control over financial reporting is a process to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our
financial reporting for external purposes in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. Internal control over financial reporting includes
maintaining records that in reasonable detail accurately and
fairly reflect our transactions; providing reasonable assurance
that transactions are recorded as necessary for preparation of
our financial statements; providing reasonable assurance that
receipts and expenditures are made in accordance with management
authorization; and providing reasonable assurance that
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of company assets
that could have a material effect on our financial statements
would be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Because of its
inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting
is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a
misstatement of our financial statements would be prevented or
detected.
Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting based on the framework
and criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. This evaluation
included review of the documentation of controls, evaluation of
the design effectiveness of controls, testing of the operating
effectiveness of controls and a conclusion on this evaluation.
Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the
Companys internal control over financial reporting was
effective as of September 30, 2007.
73
Auditors
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Starbucks
Corporation
Seattle, Washington
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of
Starbucks Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company)
as of September 30, 2007, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. The Companys management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Report of
Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys
internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
companys principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected
by the companys board of directors, management, and other
personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over
financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or
improper management override of controls, material misstatements
due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting
to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of September 30, 2007, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2007, of the Company and our report
dated November 29, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on
those financial statements.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Seattle, Washington
November 29, 2007
74
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
As used in this Part III, Starbucks and the
Company mean Starbucks Corporation.
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
The information required by this item regarding the
Companys directors is incorporated herein by reference to
the sections entitled Proposal 1 Election
Of Directors and Executive Compensation
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance and Corporate Governance
Board Committees and Related Matters in the Companys
definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held on March 19, 2008 (the Proxy
Statement). Information regarding the Companys
executive officers is set forth in Item 4 of Part 1 of
this Report under the caption Executive Officers of the
Registrant.
The Company adopted a code of ethics applicable to its chief
executive officer, chief financial officer, controller and other
finance leaders, which is a code of ethics as
defined by applicable rules of the SEC. This code is publicly
available on the Companys website at
www.starbucks.com/aboutus/corporate governance.asp.
If the Company makes any amendments to this code other than
technical, administrative or other non-substantive amendments,
or grants any waivers, including implicit waivers, from a
provision of this code to the Companys chief executive
officer, chief financial officer or controller, the Company will
disclose the nature of the amendment or waiver, its effective
date and to whom it applies on its website or in a report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to the sections entitled Executive
Compensation and Corporate Governance
Compensation Committee in the Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Shareholder Matters
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to the sections entitled Beneficial Ownership of
Common Stock and Executive Compensation
Equity Compensation Plan Information in the Proxy
Statement.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to the section entitled Executive
Compensation Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions and Corporate Governance
Affirmative Determinations Regarding Director Independence and
Other Matters in the Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to the sections entitled Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm Fees and Policy on Audit
Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit
Services of the Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm in the Proxy Statement.
75
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
(a) The following documents are filed as a part of this
Form 10-K:
The following financial statements are included in Part II,
Item 8 of this
Form 10-K:
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2007, October 1, 2006, and
October 2, 2005;
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2007, and
October 1, 2006;
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended
September 30, 2007, October 1, 2006, and
October 2, 2005;
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity for the
fiscal years ended September 30, 2007, October 1,
2006, and October 2, 2005;
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements; and
|
|
|
|
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
2.
|
Financial
Statement Schedules
|
Financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not
required or are not applicable, or the required information is
provided in the consolidated financial statements or notes
described in Item 15(a)(1) above.
The Exhibits listed in the Index to Exhibits, which appears
immediately following the signature page and is incorporated
herein by reference, are filed as part of this
Form 10-K.
76
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
STARBUCKS CORPORATION
James L. Donald
president and chief executive officer
November 29, 2007
POWER OF
ATTORNEY
Know all persons by these presents, that each person whose
signature appears below constitutes and appoints Howard Schultz,
James L. Donald and Peter J. Bocian, and each of them, as such
persons true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with
full power of substitution and resubstitution, for such person
and in such persons name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Report, and
to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents
in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and
each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each
and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in
connection therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as
such person might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming that all said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of
them or their or such persons substitute or substitutes,
may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Howard
Schultz
Howard
Schultz
|
|
chairman of the Board of Directors
|
|
November 29, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ James
L. Donald
James
L. Donald
|
|
president and chief executive officer, director
|
|
November 29, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Peter
J. Bocian
Peter
J. Bocian
|
|
executive vice president, chief financial officer and chief
administrative officer (principal financial officer and
principal accounting officer)
|
|
November 29, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Barbara
Bass
Barbara
Bass
|
|
director
|
|
November 29, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Howard
Behar
Howard
Behar
|
|
director
|
|
November 29, 2007
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ William
W. Bradley
William
W. Bradley
|
|
director
|
|
November 29, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Mellody
Hobson
Mellody
Hobson
|
|
director
|
|
November 29, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Olden
Lee
Olden
Lee
|
|
director
|
|
November 29, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ James
G. Shennan Jr.
James
G. Shennan Jr.
|
|
director
|
|
November 29, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Javier
G. Teruel
Javier
G. Teruel
|
|
director
|
|
November 29, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Myron
E. Ullman III
Myron
E. Ullman III
|
|
director
|
|
November 29, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Craig
E. Weatherup
Craig
E. Weatherup
|
|
director
|
|
November 29, 2007
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
First Filing
|
|
Number
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation of Starbucks Corporation
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-20322
|
|
05/12/06
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Starbucks Corporation
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
11/20/07
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Form of Indenture
|
|
S-3 ASR
|
|
333-145572
|
|
8/20/07
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Form of Note for 6.25% Senior Notes due 2017
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
8/23/07
|
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Form of Supplemental Indenture for 6.25% Senior Notes due
2017
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
8/23/07
|
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
|
|
10
|
.1*
|
|
Starbucks Corporation Amended and Restated Key Employee Stock
Option Plan 1994
|
|
10-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
12/23/03
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
.2*
|
|
Starbucks Corporation Amended and Restated 1989 Stock Option
Plan for Non-Employee Directors
|
|
10-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
12/23/03
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Starbucks Corporation 1991 Company-Wide Stock Option Plan, as
amended and restated through November 20, 2003
|
|
10-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
12/23/03
|
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
|
|
10
|
.3.1
|
|
Starbucks Corporation 1991 Company-Wide Stock Option
Plan Rules of the UK Sub-Plan, as amended and
restated through November 20, 2003
|
|
10-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
12/23/03
|
|
|
10
|
.3.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
.4*
|
|
Starbucks Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan
1995 as amended and restated through October 1, 2006
|
|
10-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
12/14/06
|
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Amended and Restated Lease, dated as of January 1, 2001,
between First and Utah Street Associates, L.P. and Starbucks
Corporation
|
|
10-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
12/20/01
|
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
|
|
10
|
.6*
|
|
Starbucks Corporation Executive Management Bonus Plan, as
amended and restated effective September 19, 2006
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
9/25/06
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
.7*
|
|
Starbucks Corporation Management Deferred Compensation Plan
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-65181
|
|
10/01/98
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
.8*
|
|
Starbucks Corporation 1997 Deferred Stock Plan
|
|
10-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
12/23/99
|
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Starbucks Corporation UK Share Save Plan
|
|
10-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
12/23/03
|
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
|
|
10
|
.10*
|
|
Starbucks Corporation Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, as
amended and restated effective September 29, 2003
|
|
10-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
12/23/03
|
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
|
|
10
|
.11*
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated
December 16, 2005 between Starbucks Corporation and Howard
Behar
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
12/19/05
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Starbucks Corporation UK Share Incentive Plan, as amended and
restated effective November 14, 2006
|
|
10-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
12/14/06
|
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
|
|
10
|
.13*
|
|
Starbucks Corporation 2005 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan, as
amended and restated effective November 15, 2005
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-20322
|
|
02/10/06
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
First Filing
|
|
Number
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
10
|
.14*
|
|
2005 Key Employee Sub-Plan to the Starbucks Corporation 2005
Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated
effective November 15, 2005
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-20322
|
|
02/10/06
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
|
|
10
|
.15*
|
|
2005 Non-Employee Director Sub-Plan to the Starbucks Corporation
2005 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
02/10/05
|
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
|
|
10
|
.16*
|
|
Stock Option Grant Agreement for Purchase of Stock under the
2005 Key Employee Sub-Plan to the Starbucks Corporation 2005
Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
02/10/05
|
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
|
|
10
|
.17*
|
|
Stock Option Grant Agreement for Purchase of Stock under the
2005 Non-Employee Director Sub-Plan to the Starbucks Corporation
2005 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
02/10/05
|
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
|
|
10
|
.18*
|
|
Letter Agreement dated as of February 11, 2005 by and among
the Company, the Schultz Irrevocable Trust and the Howard D.
Schultz Irrevocable Trust
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-20322
|
|
02/16/05
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
.19*
|
|
Letter Agreement dated March 30, 2005 between Starbucks
Corporation and James L. Donald
|
|
8-K/A
|
|
0-20322
|
|
04/07/05
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
.20*
|
|
Letter Agreement dated September 24, 2007 between Starbucks
Corporation and Michael Casey
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10
|
.21*
|
|
Letter Agreement dated May 25, 2005 between Starbucks
Corporation and David A. Pace
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
05/27/05
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
2005 Company-Wide Sub-Plan to the Starbucks Corporation 2005
Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-20322
|
|
08/10/05
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Stock Option Grant Agreement for Purchase of Stock under the
2005 Company-Wide Sub-Plan to the Starbucks Corporation 2005
Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-20322
|
|
08/10/05
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Credit Agreement dated August 12, 2005 among Starbucks
Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent,
Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, Wachovia Bank N.A. and
Citibank, N.A., as Co-Documentation Agents, Banc of America
Securities LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Joint Lead
Arrangers and Joint Book Managers, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as
Syndication Agent, and the other Lenders party thereto.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
08/15/05
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement between Starbucks Corporation
and Banc of America Securities LLC, dated as of March 27,
2007.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
3/27/07
|
|
|
10
|
.1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
First Filing
|
|
Number
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement between Starbucks Corporation
and Goldman, Sachs & Co., dated as of March 27,
2007
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
3/27/07
|
|
|
10
|
.1.2
|
|
|
|
10
|
.27*
|
|
Letter Agreement dated April 2, 2007 between Starbucks
Corporation and Peter J. Bocian
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
4/3/07
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
.28*
|
|
Letter Agreement dated July 16, 2007 between Starbucks
Corporation and Martin Coles
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
7/17/07
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
.29*
|
|
Letter Agreement dated July 16, 2007 between Starbucks
Corporation and James C. Alling
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
7/17/07
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
|
|
10
|
.30*
|
|
Letter Agreement dated July 16, 2007 between Starbucks
Corporation and Launi Skinner
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
7/17/07
|
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
21
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of Starbucks Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
23
|
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
32
|
|
|
Certifications of Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes a compensatory plan, contract or arrangement, in which
the Companys directors or executive officers may
participate. |