e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the fiscal year ended
September 28, 2008
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period
from to .
|
Commission File Number: 0-20322
Starbucks Corporation
(Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Washington
|
|
91-1325671
|
(State of
Incorporation)
|
|
(IRS Employer ID)
|
2401 Utah
Avenue South
Seattle, Washington 98134
(206) 447-1575
(Address of principal executive
offices, zip code, telephone number)
Securities
Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share
|
|
Nasdaq Global Select Market
|
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation of S-K is not contained
herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the
registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer þ
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant as of the last business day of
the registrants most recently completed second fiscal
quarter, based upon the closing sale price of the
registrants common stock on March 28, 2008 as
reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market was
$12.1 billion. As of November 13, 2008, there were
approximately 733.3 million shares of the registrants
Common Stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement for the
registrants Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on
March 18, 2009 have been incorporated by reference into
Part III of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
STARBUCKS
CORPORATION
Form 10-K
For the
Fiscal Year Ended September 28, 2008
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
PART I
Item 1. Business
General
Starbucks Corporation was formed in 1985 and today is the
worlds leading roaster and retailer of specialty coffee.
Starbucks (together with its subsidiaries, Starbucks
or the Company) purchases and roasts high-quality
whole bean coffees and sells them, along with fresh, rich-brewed
coffees, Italian-style espresso beverages, cold blended
beverages, a variety of complementary food items, a selection of
premium teas, and coffee-related accessories and equipment,
primarily through Company-operated retail stores. Starbucks also
sells coffee and tea products and licenses its trademark through
other channels such as licensed retail stores and, through
certain of its equity investees and licensees, Starbucks
produces and sells a variety of ready-to-drink beverages. All
channels outside the Company-operated retail stores are
collectively known as specialty operations.
The Companys objective is to establish Starbucks as one of
the most recognized and respected brands in the world. To
achieve this goal, the Company plans to continue disciplined
expansion of its retail operations, to grow its specialty
operations and to selectively pursue other opportunities by
introducing new products and developing new channels of
distribution.
Segment
Financial Information
Starbucks has three reportable operating segments, with each
segment providing the indicated percentage of total net revenues
for fiscal year ended September 28, 2008 (fiscal
2008): United States (76%), International (20%) and Global
Consumer Products Group (CPG) (4%). The United
States and International segments both include Company-operated
retail stores and certain components of specialty operations.
Specialty operations within the United States includes licensed
retail stores, foodservice accounts and other initiatives
related to the Companys core business. International
specialty operations primarily consists of retail store
licensing operations in more than 30 countries and foodservice
accounts in Canada and the United Kingdom (UK). The
International segments largest markets, based on number of
retail stores, currently are Canada, Japan and the UK. The CPG
segment includes packaged coffee and tea as well as branded
products sold worldwide through channels such as grocery stores,
warehouse clubs and convenience stores, and operates primarily
through joint ventures and licensing arrangements with large
consumer products business partners. This operating model
leverages the business partners existing infrastructures
and as a result, the CPG segment reflects relatively lower
revenues, a modest cost structure, and a resulting higher
operating margin, compared to the Companys other two
reporting segments, which consist primarily of retail stores.
Financial information about Starbucks segments is included in
Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements included
in Item 8 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
(10-K
or Report).
1
Revenue
Components
The following table shows the Companys revenue components
as a percentage of total net revenues and related specialty
revenues for the fiscal year ended September 28, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
Total Net
|
|
|
Specialty
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Company-operated retail
|
|
|
84
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail stores
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
Packaged coffee and tea
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
Branded products
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total licensing
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
73
|
%
|
Foodservice and other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foodservice
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
Other initiatives
|
|
|
<1
|
%
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total foodservice and other
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total specialty
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-operated
Retail Stores
The Companys retail goal is to become the leading retailer
and brand of coffee in each of its target markets by selling the
finest quality coffee and related products and by providing each
customer a unique Starbucks Experience. The Starbucks
Experience, or third place beyond home and work, is built
upon superior customer service as well as clean and
well-maintained Company-operated retail stores that reflect the
personalities of the communities in which they operate, thereby
building a high degree of customer loyalty.
Starbucks strategy for expanding its retail business is to
increase its market share by selectively opening additional
stores in existing markets and opening stores in new markets to
support its long term strategic objectives. As described in more
detail in Managements Discussion and Analysis in this
10-K, the
Company committed in June 2008 to close approximately 600
underperforming Company-operated stores in the US. The decision
was an integral part of its transformation strategy, first
announced in January 2008, and was a result of a rigorous
evaluation of the US Company-operated store portfolio. The store
closures were initiated in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 and
are expected to be completed by the end of fiscal 2009.
Starbucks Company-operated retail stores accounted for 84% of
total net revenues during fiscal 2008.
2
The following table summarizes total Company-operated retail
store data for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Stores Opened
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Closed) During the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year
Ended(1)
|
|
|
Stores Open as of
|
|
|
|
Sep 28, 2008
|
|
|
Sep 30, 2007
|
|
|
Sep 28, 2008
|
|
|
Sep 30, 2007
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
445
|
(2)
|
|
|
1,065
|
|
|
|
7,238
|
|
|
|
6,793
|
|
International:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada(3)
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
627
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
664
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
China
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
Thailand
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
Singapore
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Australia(4)
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
Other
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total International
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
1,979
|
|
|
|
1,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Company-operated
|
|
|
681
|
|
|
|
1,351
|
|
|
|
9,217
|
|
|
|
8,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Store openings are reported net of closures. |
|
(2) |
|
Of the approximately 600 stores selected for closure, 205 stores
were closed in fiscal 2008. |
|
(3) |
|
Store data has been adjusted for the fiscal 2008 acquisition of
assets and development rights for the Companys Quebec and
Atlantic Canada operations by reclassifying historical
information from Licensed stores to Company-operated stores. |
|
(4) |
|
Starbucks restructured its Australia market by closing 61 stores
in August 2008. |
Starbucks retail stores are typically located in high-traffic,
high-visibility locations. Because the Company can vary the size
and format, its stores are located in or near a variety of
settings, including downtown and suburban retail centers, office
buildings and university campuses. While the Company selectively
locates stores in shopping malls, it focuses on locations that
provide convenient access for both pedestrians and drivers. The
Company also locates retail stores in select rural and
off-highway locations to serve a broader array of customers
outside major metropolitan markets. To provide a greater degree
of access and convenience for nonpedestrian customers, the
Company has continued to expand development of drive-thru retail
stores. At the end of fiscal 2008, the Company operated
approximately 2,800 drive-thru locations, compared to
approximately 2,300 at the end of fiscal 2007, representing
approximately 35% and 31%, respectively, of Company-operated
stores in the US and Canada combined.
All Starbucks stores offer a choice of regular and decaffeinated
coffee beverages, a broad selection of Italian-style espresso
beverages, cold blended beverages, iced shaken refreshment
beverages, a selection of premium teas and distinctively
packaged roasted whole bean coffees. Starbucks stores also offer
a variety of fresh food items, including several healthy choice
selections. Food items include pastries, prepared breakfast and
lunch sandwiches, and salads as well as sodas, juices, and
bottled water. Starbucks continues to expand its food warming
program in the United States and Canada, with approximately half
of these stores as of September 28, 2008 providing warm
food items, primarily breakfast sandwiches. A range of
coffee-making equipment and accessories are also sold in the
stores. Each Starbucks store varies its product mix depending
upon the size of the store and its location. Larger stores carry
a broad selection of the Companys whole bean coffees in
various sizes and types of packaging, as well as coffee and
espresso-making equipment and accessories. Smaller Starbucks
stores and kiosks typically sell a full line of coffee
beverages, a limited selection of whole bean coffees and a few
accessories such as travel tumblers and logo mugs.
3
Retail sales mix by product type for Company-operated stores was
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sep 28, 2008
|
|
|
Sep 30, 2007
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
|
Beverages
|
|
|
76
|
%
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
|
|
77
|
%
|
Food
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
Coffee-making equipment and other merchandise
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
Whole bean coffees
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty
Operations
Specialty operations strive to develop the Companys brands
outside the Company-operated retail store environment through a
number of channels. Starbucks strategy is to reach customers
where they work, travel, shop and dine by establishing
relationships with prominent third parties that share the
Companys values and commitment to quality. These
relationships take various forms, including licensing
arrangements, foodservice accounts and other initiatives related
to the Companys core businesses. In certain situations,
Starbucks has an equity ownership interest in licensee
operations. During fiscal 2008, specialty revenues (which
include royalties and fees from licensees, as well as product
sales derived from specialty operations) accounted for 16% of
total net revenues.
Licensing
Retail stores
In its licensed retail store operations, the Company leverages
the expertise of its local partners and shares Starbucks
operating and store development experience. Licensee partners
provide improved and, at times, the only access to desirable
retail space. Most licensees are prominent retailers with
in-depth market knowledge and access. As part of these
arrangements, Starbucks receives license fees and royalties and
sells coffee, tea and related products for resale in licensed
locations. Employees working in licensed retail locations are
required to follow Starbucks detailed store operating procedures
and attend training classes similar to those given to employees
in Company-operated stores.
During fiscal 2008, 438 Starbucks licensed retail stores were
opened in the United States and, as of September 28, 2008,
the Companys US licensees operated 4,329 stores. During
fiscal 2008, 550 International licensed stores were opened. At
September 28, 2008, the Companys International
operating segment had a total of 3,134 licensed retail stores.
Product sales to and royalty and license fee revenues from US
and International licensed retail stores accounted for 48% of
specialty revenues in fiscal 2008.
At fiscal year end 2008, Starbucks total licensed retail stores
by region and specific location were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia Pacific
|
|
Europe/Middle East/Africa
|
|
Americas
|
|
Japan
|
|
814
|
|
Turkey
|
|
107
|
|
United States
|
|
4,329
|
China
|
|
269
|
|
Spain
|
|
76
|
|
Mexico
|
|
241
|
South Korea
|
|
254
|
|
Greece
|
|
76
|
|
Canada
|
|
231
|
Taiwan
|
|
221
|
|
United Arab Emirates
|
|
69
|
|
Other
|
|
44
|
Philippines
|
|
150
|
|
Saudi Arabia
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
113
|
|
Kuwait
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
Indonesia
|
|
69
|
|
France
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
New Zealand
|
|
43
|
|
Switzerland
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
1,933
|
|
Total
|
|
685
|
|
Total
|
|
4,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing
Packaged coffee and tea
Through a licensing relationship with Kraft Foods, Inc.
(Kraft), the Company sells a selection of Starbucks
and Seattles Best Coffee branded packaged coffees and
Tazo®
teas in grocery and warehouse club stores throughout the United
States. Kraft manages all distribution, marketing, advertising
and promotion of these products.
4
The Company sells packaged coffee and tea internationally both
directly to warehouse club customers, such as Costco, and
through a licensing relationship with Kraft in Canada and the UK.
By the end of fiscal 2008, the Companys coffees and teas
were available in approximately 37,000 grocery and warehouse
club stores, with 33,000 in the United States and 4,000 in
International markets. Revenues from this category comprised 21%
of specialty revenues in fiscal 2008.
Licensing
Branded products
The Company licenses the rights to produce and market Starbucks
branded products through several partnerships both domestically
and internationally. Significant licensing agreements include:
|
|
|
|
|
The North American Coffee Partnership, a joint venture with the
Pepsi-Cola Company in which Starbucks is a 50% equity investor,
manufactures and markets ready-to-drink beverages, including
bottled
Frappuccino®
beverages and Starbucks
DoubleShot®
espresso drinks;
|
|
|
|
licensing agreements for the manufacturing, marketing and
distribution of Starbucks
Discoveries®,
a ready-to-drink chilled cup coffee beverage, in Japan and South
Korea;
|
|
|
|
a licensing agreement established in August 2008 with Unilever
and Pepsi-Cola Company for the manufacturing, marketing and
distribution of Starbucks super-premium
Tazo®
Tea ready-to-drink beverages in the US and Canada; and
|
|
|
|
the International Coffee Partnership, another joint venture with
the Pepsi-Cola Company, to manufacture, market and distribute
ready-to-drink beverages internationally which currently
includes bottled
Frappuccino®
beverages in China and Mexico.
|
Collectively, the revenues from these branded products accounted
for 4% of specialty revenues in fiscal 2008.
Foodservice
The Company sells whole bean and ground coffees, including the
Starbucks and Seattles Best Coffee brands, as well as a
selection of premium
Tazo®
teas and other related products, to institutional foodservice
companies that service business and industry, education,
healthcare, office coffee distributors, hotels, restaurants,
airlines and other retailers. The majority of the Companys
direct accounts are through national broadline distribution
networks with SYSCO Corporation and US
Foodservicetm.
Starbucks foodservice sales, customer service and support
resources are aligned with those of SYSCO Corporation and US
Foodservice.
The Companys total foodservice operations had over 19,000
accounts, primarily in the US, at fiscal year end 2008. Revenues
from foodservice accounts comprised 25% of total specialty
revenues in fiscal 2008.
Product
Supply
Starbucks is committed to selling only the finest whole bean
coffees and coffee beverages. To ensure compliance with its
rigorous coffee standards, Starbucks controls its coffee
purchasing, roasting and packaging, and the distribution of
coffee used in its operations. The Company purchases green
coffee beans from coffee-producing regions around the world and
custom roasts them to its exacting standards for its many blends
and single origin coffees.
The supply and price of coffee are subject to significant
volatility. Although most coffee trades in the commodity market,
high-altitude arabica coffee of the quality sought by the
Company tends to trade on a negotiated basis at a substantial
premium above commodity coffee prices, depending upon the supply
and demand at the time of purchase. Supply and price can be
affected by multiple factors in the producing countries,
including weather, political and economic conditions. In
addition, green coffee prices have been affected in the past,
and may be affected in the future, by the actions of certain
organizations and associations that have historically attempted
to influence prices of green coffee through agreements
establishing export quotas or by restricting coffee supplies.
To help ensure sustainability and future supply of high-quality
green coffees in Central America and to reinforce the
Companys leadership role in the coffee industry, Starbucks
operates the Starbucks Coffee Agronomy Company
5
S.R.L., a wholly owned subsidiary located in Costa Rica. Staffed
with agronomists and sustainability experts, this
first-of-its-kind Farmer Support Center is designed to
proactively respond to changes in coffee producing countries
that impact farmers and the supply of green coffee. During
fiscal 2008, the Company expanded this sustainability program to
Africa by establishing a Farmer Support Center in Rwanda.
The Company buys coffee using fixed-price and price-to-be-fixed
purchase commitments, depending on market conditions, to secure
an adequate supply of quality green coffee. Due to volatility in
green coffee commodity prices, the Company has historically used
fixed-price purchase contracts in order to bring greater
certainty to its cost of sales in future periods and promote
sustainability by paying an equitable price to coffee producers.
When green coffee commodity prices are high for sustained
periods of time, the Company is less likely to enter into
fixed-price contracts on favorable terms and more likely to
increase the use of price-to-be-fixed contracts to meet its
demand for coffee. These types of contracts state the quality,
quantity and delivery periods and fix the price relative to a
green coffee commodity benchmark, but allow the benchmark price
to be established after contract signing. An increased use of
price-to-be-fixed contracts instead of fixed-price contracts
decreases the predictability of coffee costs in future periods
until the price of green coffee becomes fixed by
either Starbucks or the seller.
During fiscal 2008 Starbucks more than doubled its volume of
price-to-be-fixed purchase commitments when compared to fiscal
2007, as a result of higher green coffee commodity prices.
During fiscal 2008, C coffee commodity prices traded
on the New York Board of Trade within a price range of $1.18 to
$1.67 per pound and prices were, on average, approximately 20%
higher than fiscal 2007 and 25% higher than fiscal 2006.
As of September 28, 2008, the Company had $583 million
of purchase commitments which, together with existing inventory,
is expected to provide an adequate supply of green coffee
through calendar 2009. Based on expected coffee delivery dates,
approximately 86%, 9% and 5% of these purchase commitments will
be received by Starbucks in fiscal years 2009, 2010 and 2011 and
later, respectively. Additionally, approximately
$246 million of these purchase commitments are
price-to-be-fixed contracts, most of which will be received by
Starbucks during fiscal 2009.
The Company depends upon its relationships with coffee
producers, outside trading companies and exporters for its
supply of green coffee. The Company believes, based on
relationships established with its suppliers, the risk of
non-delivery on such purchase commitments is remote.
In addition to coffee, the Company also purchases significant
amounts of dairy products, particularly fluid milk, to support
the needs of its Company-operated retail stores. Dairy expense
for the US segment represents a large majority of the
Companys total dairy expense; therefore significant
changes in US dairy prices can have a material impact on total
dairy expense. The US segments dairy costs, which closely
follow the monthly Class I fluid milk base price as
calculated by the US Department of Agriculture, can change
significantly in the short term. The Companys US dairy
costs remained higher throughout most of fiscal 2008 compared to
fiscal 2007, adversely affecting the US segments and the
Companys profitability. In the United States, the Company
purchases substantially all of its fluid milk requirements from
three dairy suppliers. The Company believes, based on
relationships established with these suppliers, that the risk of
non-delivery of enough fluid milk to support its US retail
business is remote.
The Company also purchases a broad range of paper and plastic
products, such as cups, lids, cutlery, napkins, straws, shopping
bags and corrugated paper boxes from several companies to
support the needs of its retail stores as well as its
manufacturing and distribution operations. The cost of these
materials is dependent in part upon commodity paper and plastic
resin costs, but the Company believes it mitigates the effect of
short-term raw material price fluctuations through strategic
relationships with key suppliers.
Products other than whole bean coffees and coffee beverages sold
in Starbucks retail stores are obtained through a number of
different channels. Beverage ingredients, other than coffee and
milk, including leaf teas and the Companys selection of
ready-to-drink beverages, are purchased from several specialty
manufacturers, usually under long-term supply contracts. Food
products, such as fresh pastries, breakfast sandwiches and lunch
items, are generally purchased from both regional and local
sources. Coffee-making equipment, such as drip and coffee press
coffeemakers, espresso machines and coffee grinders, are
generally purchased directly from their manufacturers.
6
Coffee-related accessories, including items bearing the
Companys logos and trademarks, are produced and
distributed through contracts with a number of different
suppliers.
Competition
The Companys primary competitors for coffee beverage sales
are quick-service restaurants and specialty coffee shops. In
almost all markets in which the Company does business, there are
numerous competitors in the specialty coffee beverage business,
and management expects this situation to continue. The Company
believes that its customers choose among specialty coffee
retailers primarily on the basis of product quality, service and
convenience, as well as price. Starbucks has been experiencing
significantly greater direct competition from large competitors
in the United States quick-service restaurant sector, some of
whom have substantially greater financial, marketing and
operating resources than the Company. Starbucks also faces
well-established competitors in many International markets and
increased competition in the US ready-to-drink coffee beverage
market.
The Companys whole bean coffees compete directly against
specialty coffees sold through supermarkets, specialty retailers
and a growing number of specialty coffee stores. Both the
Companys whole bean coffees and its coffee beverages
compete indirectly against all other coffees on the market.
Starbucks specialty operations face significant competition from
established wholesale and mail order suppliers, some of whom
have greater financial and marketing resources than the Company.
Starbucks also faces intense competition from both restaurants
and other specialty retailers for prime retail locations and
qualified personnel to operate both new and existing stores.
Patents,
Trademarks, Copyrights and Domain Names
The Company owns
and/or has
applied to register numerous trademarks and service marks in the
United States and in many additional countries throughout the
world. Rights to the trademarks and service marks in the United
States are generally held by a wholly owned affiliate of the
Company and are used by the Company under license. Some of the
Companys trademarks, including Starbucks, the Starbucks
logo, Frappuccino, Seattles Best Coffee and Tazo are of
material importance to the Company. The duration of trademark
registrations varies from country to country. However,
trademarks are generally valid and may be renewed indefinitely
as long as they are in use
and/or their
registrations are properly maintained.
The Company owns numerous copyrights for items such as product
packaging, promotional materials, in-store graphics and training
materials. The Company also holds patents on certain products,
systems and designs. In addition, the Company has registered and
maintains numerous Internet domain names, including
Starbucks.com and Starbucks.net.
Research
and Development
Starbucks research and development efforts are led by the
Research and Development department. This team is responsible
for the technical development of food and beverage products and
new equipment. The Company spent approximately
$7.2 million, $7.0 million and $6.5 million
during fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, on technical
research and development activities, in addition to customary
product testing and product and process improvements in all
areas of its business.
Seasonality
and Quarterly Results
The Companys business is subject to seasonal fluctuations,
including fluctuations resulting from the holiday season. The
Companys cash flows from operations are considerably
higher in the fiscal first quarter than the remainder of the
year. This is largely driven by cash received as Starbucks Cards
are purchased and loaded during the holiday season. Since
revenues from the Starbucks Card are recognized upon redemption
and not when purchased, seasonal fluctuations on the
consolidated statements of earnings are much less pronounced.
Quarterly results are affected by the timing of the opening of
new stores, and the Companys growth may conceal the impact
of other seasonal influences. For these reasons, results for any
quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results that may
be achieved for the full fiscal year.
7
Employees
The Company employed approximately 176,000 people worldwide
as of September 28, 2008. In the United States, Starbucks
employed approximately 143,000 people, with 136,000 in
Company-operated retail stores and the remainder in the
Companys administrative and regional offices, and store
development, roasting and warehousing operations. Approximately
33,000 employees were employed outside of the United
States, with 32,000 in Company-operated retail stores and the
remainder in the Companys regional support facilities and
roasting and warehousing operations. The number of the
Companys employees represented by unions is immaterial.
Starbucks believes its current relations with its employees are
good.
Available
Information
Starbucks
10-K
reports, along with all other reports and amendments filed with
or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC), are publicly available free of charge on the
Investor Relations section of Starbucks website at
http://investor.starbucks.com
or at www.sec.gov as soon as reasonably practicable after these
materials are filed with or furnished to the SEC. The
Companys corporate governance policies, ethics code and
Board of Directors committee charters are also posted
within this section of the website. The information on the
Companys website is not part of this or any other report
Starbucks files with, or furnishes to, the SEC.
Global
Responsibility
Starbucks is committed to being a deeply responsible company in
the communities where it does business around the world. The
Companys focus is on ethically sourcing high-quality
coffee, reducing its environmental impacts and contributing
positively to communities. Starbucks Global Responsibility
strategy and commitments are integral to the Companys
overall business strategy. As a result, Starbucks believes it
delivers benefits to the Company and its stakeholders, including
employees, business partners, customers, suppliers,
shareholders, community members and others. For an overview of
Starbucks Global Responsibility strategy and commitments, please
see Starbucks fiscal 2008 Global Responsibility Report, which
will be available online at www.starbucks.com/sharedplanet in
April 2009.
Item 1A. Risk
Factors
Starbucks is including this Cautionary Statement to make
applicable and take advantage of the safe harbor provisions of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the
Act) for forward-looking statements. This
10-K
includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Act. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact
that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts.
They often include words such as believes,
expects, anticipates,
estimates, intends, plans,
seeks or words of similar meaning, or future or
conditional verbs, such as will, should,
could, may, aims,
intends, or projects. A forward-looking
statement is neither a prediction nor a guarantee of future
events or circumstances, and those future events or
circumstances may not occur. Investors should not place undue
reliance on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as
of the date of this Report. These forward-looking statements are
all based on currently available operating, financial and
competitive information and are subject to various risks and
uncertainties. The Companys actual future results and
trends may differ materially depending on a variety of factors,
including, but not limited to, the risks and uncertainties
discussed below.
|
|
|
Failure
to meet market expectations for Starbucks financial performance
will likely adversely affect the market price of Starbucks
stock.
|
The Companys failure to meet market expectations going
forward, particularly with respect to comparable store sales,
net revenues, operating margins, and earnings per share, will
likely result in a decline in the market price of Starbucks
stock.
8
|
|
|
The
Company may not be successful in implementing important new
strategic initiatives, which may have a material adverse impact
on its business and financial results.
|
In fiscal 2008, the Company undertook the development and
implementation of several important strategic initiatives as
part of a transformation strategy designed to drive long-term
shareholder value and improve Starbucks results of operations,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
improving the current state of the US business by refocusing on
the customer experience in the stores, new products and store
design elements, and new training and tools for the
Companys store partners to help them give customers a
superior experience;
|
|
|
|
slowing the Companys pace of US store openings and closing
a number of underperforming US store locations, enabling
Starbucks to renew its focus on its store-level unit economics;
|
|
|
|
re-igniting the emotional attachment with customers and
restoring the connections customers have with
Starbucks®
coffee, brand, people and stores; and
|
|
|
|
re-aligning Starbucks organization and streamlining the
management to better support customer-focused initiatives and
reallocating resources to key value drivers.
|
There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to
successfully implement its new strategic initiatives or that its
transformation plan will result in improved results of
operations. If the Company does not successfully implement its
new strategic initiatives, or if its transformation plan does
not achieve its intended results, the Company may experience a
material adverse impact on its business and financial results.
|
|
|
Starbucks
is subject to a number of significant risks that might cause the
Companys actual results to vary materially from its
forecasts, targets, plans, or projections,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
lower customer traffic or average value per transaction, which
negatively impacts comparable store sales, net revenues,
operating income, operating margins and earnings per share, due
to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the impact of initiatives by competitors and increased
competition generally;
|
|
|
|
lack of customer acceptance of new products or price increases
necessary to cover costs of new products
and/or
higher input costs;
|
|
|
|
unfavorable general economic conditions in the markets in which
Starbucks operates, including, but not limited to, downturns in
the housing market, higher interest rates, higher unemployment
rates, lower disposable income due to higher energy or other
consumer costs, lower consumer confidence, and other events or
factors that adversely affect consumer spending, including the
ongoing global financial crises;
|
|
|
|
customers trading down to lower priced products within
Starbucks,
and/or
shifting to competitors with lower priced products;
|
|
|
|
declines in general consumer demand for specialty coffee
products; or
|
|
|
|
adverse impacts due to negative publicity regarding the
Companys business practices or the health effects of
consuming its products;
|
|
|
|
|
|
cost increases that are either wholly or partially beyond the
Companys control, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
commodity costs for commodities that cannot be effectively
hedged, such as fluid milk, and to a lesser extent, high-
quality arabica coffee (See also the discussion on
page 6 under Product Supply);
|
|
|
|
labor costs such as increased health care costs, general market
wage levels and workers compensation insurance costs;
|
|
|
|
litigation against Starbucks, particularly class action
litigation;
|
|
|
|
construction costs associated with new store openings;
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
information technology costs and other logistical resources
necessary to maintain and support the global growth of the
Companys business; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
delays in store openings for reasons beyond the Companys
control, or a lack of desirable real estate locations available
for lease at reasonable rates, either of which could keep the
Company from meeting annual store opening targets and, in turn,
negatively impact net revenues, operating income and earnings
per share;
|
|
|
|
any material interruption in the Companys supply chain
beyond its control, such as material interruption of roasted
coffee supply due to the casualty loss of any of the
Companys roasting plants or the failures of third-party
suppliers, or interruptions in service by common carriers that
ship goods within the Companys distribution
channels; and
|
|
|
|
the impact on Starbucks business of factors such as labor
discord, war, terrorism (including incidents targeting
Starbucks), political instability in certain markets and natural
disasters.
|
|
|
|
The
global economic crisis could adversely affect the Companys
business and financial results and have a material adverse
affect on Starbucks liquidity and capital
resources.
|
As the recent global financial crisis has broadened and
intensified, other sectors of the economy have been adversely
impacted and a severe global recession now appears likely. As a
retailer that is dependent upon consumer discretionary spending,
the Company will face an extremely challenging fiscal 2009
because Starbucks customers may have less money for
discretionary purchases as a result of job losses, foreclosures,
bankruptcies, reduced access to credit and sharply falling home
prices. Any resulting decreases in customer traffic or average
value per transaction will negatively impact the Companys
financial performance as reduced revenues result in sales
de-leveraging which creates downward pressure on margins.
Additionally, many of the effects and consequences of the global
financial crisis and a broader global economic downturn are
currently unknown; any one or all of them could potentially have
a material adverse effect on the Companys liquidity and
capital resources, including Starbucks ability to issue
commercial paper and to raise additional capital if needed, the
ability of banks to honor draws on Starbucks credit facility, or
otherwise negatively impact the Companys business and
financial results.
|
|
|
Starbucks
is highly dependent on the financial performance of its United
States operating segment.
|
The Companys financial performance is highly dependent on
its United States operating segment, which comprised 76% of
consolidated total net revenues in fiscal 2008. The Company
experienced a substantial down-turn in traffic in its US stores
in fiscal 2008, which adversely affected the operating results
of the US segment and the Company as a whole. If the US segment
is unable to improve its financial performance, the
Companys business and financial results will continue to
be adversely affected.
|
|
|
Starbucks
may not fully realize the anticipated positive impacts to future
financial results from the restructuring measures announced in
July 2008.
|
In July 2008, the Company announced several restructuring
measures as part of the Companys multi-faceted plan to
transform its business and improve results of operations,
including a plan to close approximately 600 underperforming
Company-operated stores in the US market, a restructuring of the
Australia market, and certain leadership and non-store
organization changes. There can be no assurance that the Company
will fully realize the anticipated positive impacts to future
financial results from these restructuring measures. The
estimated costs and charges associated with the US store
closures are based on managements assumptions and
projections and may vary materially based on various factors,
including the timing of store closures, the outcome of
negotiations with landlords and other third parties, the
Companys ability to place affected partners (employees)
into available positions at other Starbucks stores, and other
changes in managements assumptions and projections. As a
result of these events and circumstances, delays and unexpected
costs may occur, which could result in the Company not fully
realizing the anticipated positive impact to the Companys
future financial results from such US store closures. Further,
to the extent that the Company is unable to improve its
financial performance in fiscal 2009, further restructuring
measures may be required in the future.
10
|
|
|
Starbucks
is increasingly dependent on the success of its International
operating segment in order to achieve its growth
targets.
|
The Companys future growth will increasingly depend on the
growth and sustained profitability of its International
operating segment. Some or all of the Companys
International market business units (MBUs), which
Starbucks generally defines by the countries or regions in which
they operate, may not be successful in their operations or in
achieving expected growth, which ultimately requires achieving
consistent, stable net revenues and earnings. The performance of
the International operating segment may be adversely affected by
economic downturns in one or more of the Companys large
MBUs. Additionally, some factors that will be critical to the
success of International MBUs are different than those affecting
the Companys US stores and licensees. Tastes naturally
vary by region, and consumers in new international markets into
which Starbucks and its licensees expand may not embrace
Starbucks products to the same extent as consumers in the
Companys existing markets. Occupancy costs and store
operating expenses are also sometimes higher internationally
than in the United States due to higher rents for prime store
locations or costs of compliance with country-specific
regulatory requirements. Because many of the Companys
International operations are in an early phase of development,
operating expenses as a percentage of related revenues are often
higher compared to US operations. The Companys
International operations are also subject to additional inherent
risks of conducting business abroad, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations;
|
|
|
|
changes or uncertainties in economic, legal, regulatory, social
and political conditions in the Companys markets;
|
|
|
|
interpretation and application of laws and regulations;
|
|
|
|
restrictive actions of foreign or United States governmental
authorities affecting trade and foreign investment, including
protective measures such as export and customs duties and
tariffs and restrictions on the level of foreign ownership;
|
|
|
|
import or other business licensing requirements;
|
|
|
|
the enforceability of intellectual property and contract rights;
|
|
|
|
limitations on the repatriation of funds and foreign currency
exchange restrictions;
|
|
|
|
in developing economies, the growth rate in the portion of the
population achieving targeted levels of disposable income may
not be as fast as the Company forecasts;
|
|
|
|
difficulty in staffing, developing and managing foreign
operations, including ensuring the consistency of product
quality and service, due to distance, language and cultural
differences; and
|
|
|
|
local laws that make it more expensive and complex to negotiate
with, retain or terminate employees.
|
Moreover, many of the foregoing risks are particularly acute in
developing counties, which are important to the Companys
long-term growth prospects.
|
|
|
Starbucks
International segment is highly dependent on the financial
performance of its Canada, Japan and UK markets; any significant
increases in costs or significant declines in net revenues or
profit contribution from one or more of these markets could have
a material adverse impact on the results of operations of the
International segment.
|
Starbucks Canada, Japan and UK markets account for a significant
portion of the net revenues and profit contribution of the
Companys International operating segment. Any significant
decline in the financial performance of one of these key markets
may have a material adverse impact on the results of operations
of the entire Starbucks International segment, if not partially
or fully offset by positive financial performance from the other
two major markets.
11
|
|
|
Starbucks
faces intense competition in the specialty coffee
market.
|
A description of the general competitive conditions in which
Starbucks operates appears on page 7 under
Competition. In the United States, the continued
focus by one or more large competitors in the quick-service
restaurant sector on selling high-quality specialty coffee
beverages at a low cost has attracted Starbucks customers and
could, if the numbers become large enough, adversely affect the
Companys sales and results of operations. Similarly,
continued competition from well-established competitors in
international markets could hinder growth and adversely affect
the Companys sales and results of operations in those
markets. Increased competition from large competitors with
significant resources in the United States packaged coffee and
tea, and ready-to-drink coffee beverage market could adversely
affect the profitability of the CPG segment and the
Companys results of operations. Given its premium brand,
Starbucks may be impacted more severely than its competitors by
customers trading down to lower priced coffee beverages and
related products.
|
|
|
The
Companys success depends substantially on the value of the
Starbucks brand.
|
Starbucks believes it has built an excellent reputation globally
for the quality of its products, for delivery of a consistently
positive consumer experience and for its corporate social
responsibility programs. The Starbucks brand has been highly
rated in several global brand value studies. Management believes
it must preserve and grow the value of the Starbucks brand to be
successful in the future, particularly outside of North America,
where the Starbucks brand is less well-known. Brand value is
based in part on consumer perceptions as to a variety of
subjective qualities. Even isolated business incidents that
erode consumer trust, particularly if the incidents receive
considerable publicity or result in litigation, can
significantly reduce brand value. Consumer demand for the
Companys products and its brand equity could diminish
significantly if Starbucks fails to preserve the quality of its
products, is perceived to act in an unethical or socially
irresponsible manner or fails to deliver a consistently positive
consumer experience in each of its markets.
|
|
|
The
loss of key personnel or difficulties recruiting and retaining
qualified personnel could jeopardize the Companys ability
to meet its financial targets.
|
The Companys success depends substantially on the
contributions and abilities of key executives and other
employees, and on its ability to recruit and retain high quality
employees to work in and manage Starbucks stores. Starbucks must
continue to recruit, retain and motivate management and other
employees sufficient to maintain its current business and
support its projected growth. A loss of key employees or a
significant shortage of high quality store employees could
jeopardize the Companys ability to meet its financial
targets.
|
|
|
The
Companys business depends in large part on the success of
its business partners and suppliers, and the Companys
brand and reputation may be harmed by actions taken by third
parties that are outside of the Companys
control.
|
The Companys business strategy, including its plans for
new stores, foodservice, branded products and other initiatives,
relies significantly on a variety of licensee and partnership
relationships, particularly in its International markets.
Licensees are often authorized to use the Starbucks logo and
provide Starbucks-branded beverages, food and other products
directly to customers. The Company provides training and support
to, and monitors the operations of, these business partners, but
the product quality and service they deliver to Starbucks
customers may be diminished by any number of factors beyond the
Companys control. Management believes customers expect the
same quality of products and service from the Companys
licensees as they do from Starbucks and the Company strives to
ensure customers have the same experience whether they visit a
Company-operated or licensed store. Any shortcoming of a
Starbucks business partner, particularly an issue affecting the
quality of the service experience or the safety of beverages or
food, may be attributed by customers to Starbucks, thus damaging
the Companys reputation and brand value and potentially
affecting the results of operations.
|
|
|
Effectively
managing the Companys growth is challenging.
|
Effectively managing growth can be challenging, particularly as
Starbucks expands into new markets internationally, where it
must balance the need for flexibility and a degree of autonomy
for local management with
12
consistency with the Companys goals, philosophy and
standards. Significant growth can make it increasingly difficult
to ensure a consistent supply of high quality raw materials, to
locate and hire sufficient numbers of key employees to meet the
Companys financial targets, to maintain an effective
system of internal controls for a globally dispersed enterprise
and to train employees worldwide to deliver a consistently high
quality product and customer experience.
|
|
|
Adverse
public or medical opinions about the health effects of consuming
the Companys products, as well as reports of incidents
involving food-borne illnesses or food tampering, whether or not
accurate, could harm its business.
|
Some Starbucks products contain caffeine, dairy products, sugar
and other active compounds, the health effects of which are the
subject of increasing public scrutiny, including the suggestion
that excessive consumption of caffeine, dairy products, sugar
and other active compounds can lead to a variety of adverse
health effects. There has also been greater public awareness
that sedentary lifestyles, combined with excessive consumption
of high-calorie foods, have led to a rapidly rising rate of
obesity. Particularly in the United States, there is increasing
consumer awareness of health risks, including obesity, due in
part to increasing publicity and attention from health
organizations, as well as increased consumer litigation based on
alleged adverse health impacts of consumption of various food
products. While Starbucks has a variety of healthy choice
beverage and food items, including items that are low in
caffeine and calories, an unfavorable report on the health
effects of caffeine or other compounds present in the
Companys products, or negative publicity or litigation
arising from other health risks such as obesity, could
significantly reduce the demand for the Companys beverages
and food products.
Similarly, instances or reports, whether true or not, of unclean
water supply, food-borne illnesses and food tampering have in
the past severely injured the reputations of companies in the
food processing, grocery and quick-service restaurant sectors
and could in the future affect the Company as well. Any report
linking Starbucks to the use of unclean water,
food-borne
illnesses or food tampering could damage its brand value,
immediately and severely hurt sales of its beverages and food
products, and possibly lead to product liability claims. Clean
water is critical to the preparation of specialty coffee
beverages. The Companys ability to ensure a clean water
supply to its stores is limited, particularly in some
International locations. If customers become ill from food-borne
illnesses, the Company could also be forced to temporarily close
some stores. In addition, instances of food-borne illnesses or
food tampering, even those occurring solely at the restaurants
or stores of competitors, could, by resulting in negative
publicity about the foodservice industry, adversely affect
Starbucks sales on a regional or global basis. A decrease in
customer traffic as a result of these health concerns or
negative publicity, or as a result of a temporary closure of any
of the Companys stores, could materially harm the
Companys business and results of operations.
|
|
|
A
regional or global health pandemic could severely affect
Starbucks business.
|
A health pandemic is a disease that spreads rapidly and widely
by infection and affects many individuals in an area or
population at the same time. If a regional or global health
pandemic were to occur, depending upon its duration and
severity, the Companys business could be severely
affected. Starbucks has positioned itself as a third place
between home and work where people can gather together for human
connection. Customers might avoid public gathering places in the
event of a health pandemic, and local, regional or national
governments might limit or ban public gatherings to halt or
delay the spread of disease. A regional or global health
pandemic might also adversely impact the Companys business
by disrupting or delaying production and delivery of materials
and products in its supply chain and by causing staffing
shortages in its stores. The impact of a health pandemic on
Starbucks might be disproportionately greater than on other
companies that depend less on the gathering of people together
for the sale, use or license of their products and services.
|
|
|
Increased
leverage and/or increases in interest rates may harm the
Companys financial condition and results of
operations.
|
As of September 28, 2008, Starbucks had approximately
$5.1 billion in minimum future rental payments under
non-cancelable operating leases and $3.2 billion of total
liabilities on a consolidated basis. Included in total
liabilities are aggregate principal indebtedness of
$713 million under outstanding commercial paper and
revolving credit facility borrowings, and $550 million
under ten-year notes maturing in August 2017. Future increases
in the Companys
13
level of financial obligations, if any, would have several
important effects on the Companys future operations, such
as:
|
|
|
|
|
additional cash requirements to support the payment of rents and
interest on outstanding indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
possible increased vulnerability to adverse changes in general
economic and industry conditions, as well as to competitive
pressure;
|
|
|
|
possible limitations on the Companys ability to obtain
additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures,
general corporate and other purposes; and
|
|
|
|
possible limitations on the Companys flexibility in
planning for, or reacting to, changes in its business and its
industry.
|
The Companys ability to satisfy its lease obligations and
make payments of principal and interest on its indebtedness
depends on its future performance, which will be subject to
general economic conditions, industry cycles and financial,
business and other factors affecting its consolidated
operations, many of which are beyond the Companys control.
If Starbucks is unable to generate sufficient cash flow from
operations in the future to satisfy its financial obligations,
it may be required, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
to seek additional financing in the debt or equity markets;
|
|
|
|
to refinance or restructure all or a portion of its indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
to sell selected assets; or
|
|
|
|
to reduce or delay planned capital or operating expenditures.
|
Such measures might not be sufficient to enable Starbucks to
satisfy its financial obligations. In addition, any such
financing, refinancing or sale of assets might not be available
on economically favorable terms.
An increase in leverage could lead to deterioration in Starbucks
credit ratings. A reduction in its credit ratings, regardless of
the cause, could limit the Companys availability of
additional financing and increase its cost of obtaining
financing.
|
|
|
Starbucks
relies heavily on information technology in its operations, and
any material failure, inadequacy, interruption or security
failure of that technology could harm the Companys ability
to effectively operate its business.
|
Starbucks relies heavily on information technology systems
across its operations, including for management of its supply
chain, point-of-sale processing in its stores, and various other
processes and transactions. The Companys ability to
effectively manage its business and coordinate the production,
distribution and sale of its products depends significantly on
the reliability and capacity of these systems. The failure of
these systems to operate effectively, problems with
transitioning to upgraded or replacement systems, or a breach in
security of these systems could cause delays in product sales
and reduced efficiency of the Companys operations, and
significant capital investments could be required to remediate
the problem.
|
|
|
Failure
of the Company to comply with applicable laws and regulations
could harm its business and financial results.
|
Starbucks policies and procedures are designed to comply with
all applicable laws and regulations, including those imposed by
the SEC, NASDAQ, and foreign countries, as well as applicable
labor laws. Additional legal and regulatory requirements, such
as those arising under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, together
with the fact that foreign laws occasionally conflict with
domestic laws, increase the complexity of the regulatory
environment in which the Company operates and the related cost
of compliance. Failure to comply with the various laws and
regulations may result in damage to Starbucks reputation, civil
and criminal liability, fines and penalties, increased cost of
regulatory compliance and restatements of the Companys
financial statements.
If any of the risks and uncertainties described in the
cautionary factors described above actually occurs, Starbucks
business, financial condition and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected. The factors listed
14
above are not exhaustive. Other sections of this
10-K include
additional factors that could materially and adversely impact
Starbucks business, financial condition and results of
operations. Moreover, Starbucks operates in a very competitive
and rapidly changing environment. New factors emerge from time
to time and it is not possible for management to predict the
impact of all these factors on Starbucks business, financial
condition or results of operation or the extent to which any
factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to
differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking
statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors
should not rely on forward-looking statements as a prediction of
actual results. Any or all of the forward-looking statements
contained in this
10-K and any
other public statement made by Starbucks or its management may
turn out to be incorrect. Starbucks expressly disclaims any
obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements,
whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise.
Item 1B. Unresolved
Staff Comments
Not applicable.
Item 2. Properties
The following table shows properties used by Starbucks in
connection with its roasting and distribution operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Size
|
|
|
Owned or
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
in Square Feet
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
Purpose
|
Kent, WA
|
|
|
332,000
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Roasting and distribution
|
Kent, WA
|
|
|
285,000
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
Warehouse
|
Renton, WA
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
Warehouse
|
York County, PA
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Roasting and distribution
|
York County, PA
|
|
|
298,000
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Warehouse
|
York County, PA
|
|
|
231,000
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
Warehouse
|
Carson Valley, NV
|
|
|
360,000
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Roasting and distribution
|
Sandy Run, SC
|
|
|
117,000
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Roasting and distribution
|
Portland, OR
|
|
|
68,000
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
Warehouse
|
Basildon, United Kingdom
|
|
|
142,000
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
Warehouse and distribution
|
Amsterdam, Netherlands
|
|
|
97,000
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
Roasting and distribution
|
The Company leases approximately 1.0 million square feet of
office space in Seattle, Washington for corporate administrative
purposes. Also in Seattle, Washington, the Company owns a
205,000 square foot office building with an adjacent
36,000 square foot plot of land, which is currently under
development. The Company is no longer occupying the office
building and is currently considering various options for both
the building and the adjacent land, including sublease and sale.
As of September 28, 2008, Starbucks had more than 9,000
Company-operated retail stores. The Company also leases space in
approximately 170 additional locations for regional, district
and other administrative offices, training facilities and
storage, not including certain seasonal retail storage locations.
Item 3. Legal
Proceedings
See discussion of Legal Proceedings in Note 17 to the
consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of
this Report.
Item 4. Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during
the fiscal fourth quarter of 2008.
15
Executive
officers of the registrant
The executive officers of the Company are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
Howard Schultz
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
chairman, president and chief executive officer
|
Cliff Burrows
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
president, Starbucks Coffee US
|
Martin Coles
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
president, Starbucks Coffee International
|
Gerardo I. Lopez
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
senior vice president; president, Global Consumer Products,
Foodservice and Seattles Best Coffee
|
Arthur Rubinfeld
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
president, Global Development
|
Peter J. Bocian
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
executive vice president, chief financial officer and chief
administrative officer
|
Troy Alstead
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
executive vice president, chief financial officer and chief
administrative officer (designate)
|
Paula E. Boggs
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
executive vice president, general counsel and secretary
|
Michelle Gass
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
executive vice president, Marketing and Category (designate)
|
Peter D. Gibbons
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
executive vice president, Global Supply Chain Operations
|
Dorothy J. Kim
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
executive vice president, Global Strategy, Office of the ceo
|
Chet Kuchinad
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
executive vice president, Partner Resources
|
Howard Schultz is the founder of Starbucks and serves as
the Companys chairman, president and chief executive
officer. Mr. Schultz has served as chairman of the board
since the Companys inception in 1985 and he resumed his
role as president and chief executive officer in January 2008.
From June 2000 to February 2005, Mr. Schultz held the title
of chief global strategist. From November 1985 to June 2000, he
served as chief executive officer. From November 1985 to June
1994, Mr. Schultz also served as president.
Cliff Burrows joined Starbucks in April 2001 and has
served as president, Starbucks Coffee US since March 2008.
Mr. Burrows served as president, Europe, Middle East and
Africa (EMEA) from April 2006 to March 2008. He served as vice
president and managing director, UK prior to April 2006. Prior
to joining Starbucks, Mr. Burrows served in various
management positions with Habitat Designs Limited, a furniture
and housewares retailer.
Martin P. Coles joined Starbucks in April 2004 as
president, Starbucks Coffee International, and, in July 2008,
reassumed this role, after having served as chief operating
officer from September 2007 to July 2008. Prior to joining
Starbucks, Mr. Coles served as an executive vice president
of Reebok International, Ltd. a sports and fitness products
company, from December 2001 to February 2004. Prior to joining
Reebok International, Ltd., Mr. Coles held several
executive level management sales and operations positions with
NIKE Inc., Letsbuyit.com and Gateway, Inc.
Gerardo I. Lopez joined Starbucks in October 2004 as
senior vice president; president, Global Consumer Products and
became senior vice president; president, Global Consumer
Products, Foodservice and Seattles Best Coffee in
November 2007. Prior to joining Starbucks, Mr. Lopez
was president of the Handleman Entertainment Resources division
of Handleman Company from November 2001 to September 2004 and
was senior vice president and general manager from May 2000 to
November 2001. Prior to that, Mr. Lopez held a variety of
executive management positions with Frito-Lay, Inc., Pepsi-Cola
Company and The Procter & Gamble Company.
Arthur Rubinfeld rejoined Starbucks in February 2008 as
president, Global Development. Mr. Rubinfeld also serves as
president of AIRVISION LLC, an advisory firm specializing in
brand positioning that he founded in June 2002. From March 2006
to February 2008, Mr. Rubinfeld served as executive vice
president, Corporate Strategy and chief development officer at
Potbelly Sandwich Works. Prior to 2002, Mr. Rubinfeld held
several positions in Store Development at Starbucks.
16
Peter J. Bocian joined Starbucks as executive vice
president and chief financial officer designate in May 2007 and
became executive vice president, chief financial officer and
chief administrative officer in October 2007. As previously
announced Mr. Bocian will resign as executive vice
president, chief financial officer and chief administrative
officer at the end of November 2008. Prior to joining Starbucks,
Mr. Bocian worked at NCR Corporation a technology and
services company. From 2004 to May 2007, Mr. Bocian served
as NCRs senior vice president and chief financial officer.
From 2003 to 2004, he served as NCRs vice president,
finance and interim chief financial officer. From 2002 to 2003,
Mr. Bocian was the chief financial officer of NCRs
Retail and Financial Group, covering four business units and
from 1999 to 2002, he served as the chief financial officer of
NCRs Retail Solutions Division.
Troy Alstead joined Starbucks in 1992 and currently
serves as the Companys senior vice president, Global
Finance, a position he has held since September 2007. As
previously announced, Mr. Alstead will succeed
Mr. Bocian as executive vice president, chief financial
officer and chief administrative officer at the end of November
2008. Mr. Alstead previously served as chief operating
officer, Starbucks Greater China from April 2008 to September
2008, senior vice president, Corporate Finance from September
2004 to August 2007, interim president, Starbucks Europe/Middle
East/Africa from April 2003 through August 2004, and senior vice
president, Starbucks Coffee International from March 2003
through March 2004. Mr. Alstead served in a number of other
senior positions with Starbucks prior to 2004.
Paula E. Boggs joined Starbucks in September 2002 as
executive vice president, general counsel and secretary. Prior
to joining Starbucks, Ms. Boggs served as vice president,
legal, for products, operations and information technology at
Dell Computer Corporation from 1997 to 2002. From 1995 to 1997,
Ms. Boggs was a partner with the law firm of Preston
Gates & Ellis (now K&L Gates). Ms. Boggs
served in several roles at the Pentagon, White House and US
Department of Justice between 1984 and 1995.
Michelle Gass joined Starbucks in 1996 and has served as
the Companys senior vice president, Marketing and Category
since July 2008. As previously announced, Ms. Gass will
assume the role of executive vice president, Marketing and
Category beginning December 1, 2008. Ms. Gass previously
served as senior vice president, Global Strategy, Office of the
ceo from January 2008 to July 2008, senior vice
president, Global Product and Brand from August 2007 to
January 2008, senior vice president, U.S. Category
Management from May 2004 to August 2007 and vice
president, U.S. Category Management from October 2003 to
April 2004. Ms. Gass served in a number of other positions
with Starbucks prior to 2003.
Peter D. Gibbons joined Starbucks in February 2007 and
has served as executive vice president, Global Supply Chain
Operations since July 2008. From February 2007 to July 2008,
Mr. Gibbons served as senior vice president, Global
Manufacturing Operations. From March 1999 to February 2007,
Mr. Gibbons was executive vice president, Supply Chain, of
The Glidden Company, a subsidiary of ICI Americas, Inc.
Dorothy J. Kim joined Starbucks in November 1995 and has
served as executive vice president, Global Strategy, Office of
the ceo since July 2008. From December 2004 to July 2008,
Ms. Kim served as executive vice president, Supply Chain
Operations. From April 2003 to December 2004, Ms. Kim
served as senior vice president, Global Logistics, Planning and
Procurement. Prior to April 2003, Ms. Kim served in various
executive roles in Supply Chain and Coffee Operations and also
held several positions in retail planning and operations.
Chet Kuchinad joined Starbucks in April 2003 and has
served as executive vice president, Partner Resources since
January 2008. Mr. Kuchinad served as senior vice president,
Total Pay from April 2003 to January 2008. Prior to joining
Starbucks, Mr. Kuchinad held a number of positions in the
field of human resources with NIKE, Inc., McDonalds
Corporation and Towers Perrin.
There are no family relationships among any directors or
executive officers of the Company.
17
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for the Registrants Common Equity, Related Shareholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
SHAREHOLDER
INFORMATION
MARKET
INFORMATION AND DIVIDEND POLICY
The Companys common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global
Select Market (NASDAQ), under the symbol
SBUX. The following table shows the quarterly high
and low closing sale prices per share of the Companys
common stock as reported by NASDAQ for each quarter during the
last two fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
September 28, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
16.92
|
|
|
$
|
13.58
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
18.60
|
|
|
|
15.66
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
20.47
|
|
|
|
16.80
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
26.84
|
|
|
|
20.03
|
|
September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
28.29
|
|
|
$
|
25.87
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
31.84
|
|
|
|
25.54
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
36.29
|
|
|
|
29.32
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
39.43
|
|
|
|
33.62
|
|
As of November 13, 2008, the Company had approximately
21,000 shareholders of record. Starbucks has never paid any
dividends on its common stock and does not currently anticipate
paying a cash dividend in the near future.
ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The Company did not repurchase any shares during the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2008. As of the end of the quarter, the
maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under
publicly announced stock repurchase plans was
6,272,128 shares.
18
Performance
Comparison Graph
The following graph depicts the Companys total return to
shareholders from September 28, 2003 through
September 28, 2008, relative to the performance of the
Standard & Poors 500 Index, the NASDAQ Composite
Index, and the Standard & Poors 500 Consumer
Discretionary Sector, a peer group that includes Starbucks. All
indices shown in the graph have been reset to a base of 100 as
of September 28, 2003, and assume an investment of $100 on
that date and the reinvestment of dividends paid since that
date. Starbucks has never paid a dividend on its common stock.
The stock price performance shown in the graph is not
necessarily indicative of future price performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9/28/03
|
|
|
10/3/04
|
|
|
10/2/05
|
|
|
10/1/06
|
|
|
9/30/07
|
|
|
9/28/08
|
Starbucks Corporation
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
159.69
|
|
|
|
$
|
169.43
|
|
|
|
$
|
230.30
|
|
|
|
$
|
177.21
|
|
|
|
$
|
101.18
|
|
S&P 500
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
113.87
|
|
|
|
$
|
127.82
|
|
|
|
$
|
141.62
|
|
|
|
$
|
164.90
|
|
|
|
$
|
128.66
|
|
NASDAQ Composite
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
107.74
|
|
|
|
$
|
123.03
|
|
|
|
$
|
131.60
|
|
|
|
$
|
158.88
|
|
|
|
$
|
119.05
|
|
S&P Consumer Discretionary
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
114.15
|
|
|
|
$
|
119.91
|
|
|
|
$
|
130.53
|
|
|
|
$
|
138.80
|
|
|
|
$
|
107.69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
Item 6. Selected
Financial Data
In
millions, except earnings per share and store
information
The following selected financial data are derived from the
consolidated financial statements of the Company. The data below
should be read in conjunction with Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, Risk Factors, and the
Companys consolidated financial statements and notes. In
particular, see Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements included in Item 8 of this Report for a
description of accounting changes that materially affect the
comparability of the data presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28,
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
Oct 2,
|
|
|
Oct 3,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
As of and for the Fiscal Year
Ended(1)
|
|
(52 Wks)
|
|
|
(52 Wks)
|
|
|
(52 Wks)
|
|
|
(52 Wks)
|
|
|
(53 Wks)
|
|
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-operated retail
|
|
$
|
8,771.9
|
|
|
$
|
7,998.3
|
|
|
$
|
6,583.1
|
|
|
$
|
5,391.9
|
|
|
$
|
4,457.4
|
|
Specialty:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
1,171.6
|
|
|
|
1,026.3
|
|
|
|
860.6
|
|
|
|
673.0
|
|
|
|
565.8
|
|
Foodservice and other
|
|
|
439.5
|
|
|
|
386.9
|
|
|
|
343.2
|
|
|
|
304.4
|
|
|
|
271.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total specialty
|
|
|
1,611.1
|
|
|
|
1,413.2
|
|
|
|
1,203.8
|
|
|
|
977.4
|
|
|
|
836.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
$
|
10,383.0
|
|
|
$
|
9,411.5
|
|
|
$
|
7,786.9
|
|
|
$
|
6,369.3
|
|
|
$
|
5,294.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
income(2)
|
|
$
|
503.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,053.9
|
|
|
$
|
894.0
|
|
|
$
|
780.5
|
|
|
$
|
606.5
|
|
Earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle
|
|
|
315.5
|
|
|
|
672.6
|
|
|
|
581.5
|
|
|
|
494.4
|
|
|
|
388.9
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change for FIN 47, net of
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
315.5
|
|
|
$
|
672.6
|
|
|
$
|
564.3
|
|
|
$
|
494.4
|
|
|
$
|
388.9
|
|
Earnings per common share before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle diluted (EPS)
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
$
|
0.73
|
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.47
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change for FIN 47, net of
taxes per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per common share diluted
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.47
|
|
Cash dividends per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
1,258.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,331.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,131.6
|
|
|
$
|
922.9
|
|
|
$
|
862.9
|
|
Capital expenditures (net additions to property, plant and
equipment)
|
|
$
|
984.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,080.3
|
|
|
$
|
771.2
|
|
|
$
|
643.3
|
|
|
$
|
416.9
|
|
BALANCE SHEET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
(deficit)(3)
|
|
$
|
(441.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(459.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(405.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
604.6
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
5,672.6
|
|
|
|
5,343.9
|
|
|
|
4,428.9
|
|
|
|
3,513.7
|
|
|
|
3,386.3
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
713.0
|
|
|
|
710.3
|
|
|
|
700.0
|
|
|
|
277.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (including current
portion)(4)
|
|
|
550.3
|
|
|
|
550.9
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
2,490.9
|
|
|
$
|
2,284.1
|
|
|
$
|
2,228.5
|
|
|
$
|
2,090.3
|
|
|
$
|
2,469.9
|
|
STORE INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage change in comparable store
sales(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Stores opened during the year (net of closures):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company operated stores
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
1,065
|
|
|
|
810
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
Licensed stores
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
723
|
|
|
|
733
|
|
|
|
596
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
International(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company operated stores
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
Licensed stores
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,669
|
|
|
|
2,571
|
|
|
|
2,199
|
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
|
|
1,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28,
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
Oct 2,
|
|
|
Oct 3,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
As of and for the Fiscal Year
Ended(1)
|
|
(52 Wks)
|
|
|
(52 Wks)
|
|
|
(52 Wks)
|
|
|
(52 Wks)
|
|
|
(53 Wks)
|
|
|
Stores open at year end:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-operated stores
|
|
|
7,238
|
|
|
|
6,793
|
|
|
|
5,728
|
|
|
|
4,918
|
|
|
|
4,338
|
|
Licensed stores
|
|
|
4,329
|
|
|
|
3,891
|
|
|
|
3,168
|
|
|
|
2,435
|
|
|
|
1,839
|
|
International(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-operated stores
|
|
|
1,979
|
|
|
|
1,743
|
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
|
|
1,217
|
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
Licensed stores
|
|
|
3,134
|
|
|
|
2,584
|
|
|
|
2,087
|
|
|
|
1,671
|
|
|
|
1,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
16,680
|
|
|
|
15,011
|
|
|
|
12,440
|
|
|
|
10,241
|
|
|
|
8,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Companys fiscal year ends on the Sunday closest to
September 30. |
|
(2) |
|
Fiscal 2008 results include pretax restructuring charges of
$266.9 million. |
|
(3) |
|
Working capital deficits were primarily due to increased current
liabilities from short term borrowings. |
|
(4) |
|
In August 2007, the Company issued $550 million of
10-year
notes. |
|
(5) |
|
Includes only Starbucks Company-operated retail stores open
13 months or longer. Comparable store sales percentage for
fiscal 2004 excludes the extra sales week. |
|
(6) |
|
International store information has been adjusted for the fiscal
2008 acquisition of assets and development rights for the
Companys Quebec and Atlantic Canada Operations by
reclassifying historical information from Licensed stores to
Company-operated stores. |
21
Item 7. Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
General
Starbucks Corporations fiscal year ends on the Sunday
closest to September 30. Some fiscal years include
53 weeks. The fiscal years ended on September 28,
2008, September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006 all
included 52 weeks. All references to store counts,
including data for new store openings, are reported net of
related store closures, unless otherwise noted.
Management
Overview
Fiscal
2008 The Year in Review
Throughout fiscal 2008, Starbucks continued to experience
declining comparable store sales in its US stores, primarily due
to lower customer traffic. With the US segment representing 76%
of consolidated revenues, the impact of this decline on the
Companys financial results for fiscal 2008 was
significant. For fiscal year 2008 comparable store sales
declined 5% in the US, with a declining trend over the course of
the year, ending with a decline of 8% in the fourth quarter. The
Company also experienced declining comparable sales in Canada
and the UK, its two largest Company-operated International
markets, primarily due to lower traffic. The Company believes
that the weaker traffic has been caused by a number of ongoing
factors in the global economies that have negatively impacted
consumers discretionary spending, as well as factors
within the Companys control with respect to the pace of
store openings in the US and store level execution. In the US,
the economic factors included the higher cost of such basic
consumer staples as gas and food, rising levels of unemployment
and personal debt, reduced access to consumer credit, and lower
home values as well as increased foreclosure activity in certain
areas of the country (California and Florida) where Starbucks
has a high concentration of Company-operated stores. These
developments combined with recent and ongoing unprecedented
shocks to the global financial system and capital markets have
all contributed to sharp declines in consumer confidence in the
US.
Starbucks business is highly sensitive to increases and
decreases in customer traffic. Increased customer visits create
sales leverage, meaning that fixed expenses, such as occupancy
costs, are spread across a greater revenue base, thereby
improving operating margins. But the reverse is also
true sales de-leveraging creates downward pressure
on margins. The softness in US revenues during fiscal 2008
impacted nearly all consolidated and US segment operating
expense line items when viewed as a percentage of sales.
Since January 2008, when Company founder Howard Schultz
reassumed the role of president and chief executive officer in
addition to his role as chairman, Starbucks has taken steps to
address the deterioration in the US retail environment and
address its global support structure. These included the
development and implementation of several important strategic
initiatives as part of a transformation strategy designed to
reinvigorate the Starbucks Experience for the
Companys customers, increase customer traffic in its US
stores, reduce infrastructure expenses, and improve the
Companys results of operations. These significant actions
have been designed to structure the Companys business for
long-term profitable growth.
As a result of the continued weak economy and decreased customer
traffic, as well as the costs associated with the store closures
and other actions in its transformation strategy, the
Companys fiscal 2008 results were negatively impacted in
the following ways:
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated operating income was $503.9 million in fiscal
2008, and operating margin for the year was 4.9% compared with
11.2% in the prior year. Approximately 260 basis points of
the decrease in operating margin was a result of restructuring
charges, primarily related to the significant US store closures.
Softness in US revenues along with higher cost of sales
including occupancy costs and store operating expenses were also
significant drivers in the margin decline.
|
|
|
|
EPS for fiscal 2008 was $0.43, compared to EPS of $0.87 per
share earned in the prior year. Restructuring charges and costs
associated with the execution of the transformation agenda
impacted EPS by approximately $0.28 per share in fiscal 2008.
|
22
Significant
Actions Taken in Fiscal 2008
The more significant actions taken by Starbucks in fiscal 2008
to transform and reinvigorate its business included:
|
|
|
|
|
A plan to close approximately 600 underperforming
Company-operated stores in the US market, of which 205 were
closed as of fiscal year-end with the remaining stores to be
closed by the end of fiscal 2009;
|
|
|
|
Restructuring the Companys Australia business by closing
61 Company-operated stores, focusing on the remaining 23 stores
in three key metro areas;
|
|
|
|
Reducing approximately 1,000 open and filled positions within
the Companys leadership structure and its non-store
organization, to rationalize its infrastructure for the reduced
number of stores; and
|
|
|
|
Introducing new beverage platforms designed to reinvigorate the
Starbucks beverage offerings, new breakfast food offerings and
bakery and chilled foods, including health and wellness choices,
and a new, everyday brewed coffee, Pike
Placetm
Roast, which returned the Company to the practice of grinding
whole beans in stores and brewing every 30 minutes to provide
customers with the freshest coffee possible.
|
Fiscal
2009 The View Ahead
Management expects the Company to continue to face a very
difficult economic environment throughout fiscal 2009, both in
the US and internationally, including in its two largest
Company-operated markets of Canada and the UK. As the global
financial crisis has broadened and intensified, other sectors of
the global economy have been adversely impacted and a severe
global recession of uncertain length now appears likely. As a
retailer that is dependent upon consumer discretionary spending,
the Company expects to face an extremely challenging fiscal 2009
because of these economic conditions. Accordingly, Starbucks
expects to report negative comparable store sales for fiscal
2009. Additionally, the Companys earnings for fiscal 2009
will be impacted by lease termination and severance costs from
the US and Australia store closures, totaling up to an estimated
$0.12 of EPS for fiscal 2009. The Company estimates that the
combination of the US and Australia store closures and head
count reductions will result in a pre-tax benefit to operating
income of approximately $200 million to $210 million
in fiscal 2009, which equates to approximately $0.17 to $0.18 of
EPS.
Starbucks plans to be disciplined in its approach to new store
openings, in both Company-operated and licensed markets, and
adjust as needed in response to further worsening in the global
economy. Starbucks fiscal 2009 US store opening target is
approximately a negative 20 net new stores, which includes
a nearly 225 Company-operated store decline and approximately
205 net new licensed stores. Internationally, Starbucks is
planning to open approximately 700 net new stores in fiscal
2009, two-thirds of which are expected to be licensed, as it
factors in the current global economic climate, with a more
cautious approach in the UK and western Europe.
Operating
Segment Overview
Starbucks has three reportable operating segments: United
States, International and CPG.
The United States and International segments both include
Company-operated retail stores, licensed retail stores and
foodservice operations. Licensed stores frequently have a higher
operating margin than Company-operated stores. Under the
licensed model, Starbucks receives a reduced share of the total
store revenues, but this is more than offset by the reduction in
its share of costs as these are primarily borne by the licensee.
The International segment has a higher relative share of
licensed stores versus Company-operated compared to the US
segment; however, the US segment has been operating
significantly longer than the International segment and has
developed deeper awareness of, and attachment to, the Starbucks
brand and stores among its customer base. As a result, the more
mature US segment has significantly more stores, and higher
total revenues than the International segment. Average sales per
store are also higher in the US due to various factors including
length of time in market and local income levels. Further,
certain market costs, particularly occupancy costs, are lower in
the US segment compared to the average for the International
segment, which comprises a more diverse group of operations. As
a result of the relative strength of the brand in the US
segment, the number of stores, the higher unit volumes, and the
lower market costs, the US segment, despite its higher relative
percentage of Company-operated stores, has a higher operating
margin, excluding restructuring costs, than the less-developed
International segment.
23
The Companys International store base continues to
increase and Starbucks has been achieving a growing contribution
from established international markets while at the same time
investing in emerging markets, such as China, Brazil and Russia.
The Companys newer international markets require a more
extensive support organization, relative to the current levels
of revenue and operating income.
The CPG segment includes packaged coffee and tea as well as
branded products operations worldwide. The CPG segment operates
primarily through joint ventures and licensing arrangements with
large consumer products business partners, most significantly
The North American Coffee Partnership with the Pepsi-Cola
Company for distribution of ready-to-drink beverages, and with
Kraft Foods Inc. for distribution of packaged coffees and teas.
This operating model allows the CPG segment to leverage the
business partners existing infrastructures and to extend
the Starbucks brand in an efficient way. Most of the customer
revenues from the ready-to-drink and packaged coffee channels
are recognized as revenues by the joint venture or licensed
business partner, not by the CPG segment, and the proportionate
share of the results of the Companys joint ventures are
included on a net basis in Income from equity
investees on the consolidated statements of earnings. As a
result, the CPG segment reflects relatively lower revenues, a
modest cost structure, and a resulting higher operating margin,
compared to the Companys other two reporting segments,
which consist primarily of retail stores.
Expenses pertaining to corporate administrative functions that
support the operating segments but are not specifically
attributable to or managed by any segment are not included in
the reported financial results of the operating segments. These
unallocated corporate expenses include certain general and
administrative expenses, related depreciation and amortization
expenses, restructuring charges and amounts included in
Interest income and other, net and Interest
expense on the consolidated statements of earnings.
Acquisitions
See Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in this
10-K.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS FISCAL 2008 COMPARED TO FISCAL
2007
Consolidated
results of operations (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28,
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28,
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total Net Revenues
|
|
|
STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-operated retail
|
|
$
|
8,771.9
|
|
|
$
|
7,998.3
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
|
|
84.5
|
%
|
|
|
85.0
|
%
|
Specialty:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
1,171.6
|
|
|
|
1,026.3
|
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Foodservice and other
|
|
|
439.5
|
|
|
|
386.9
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total specialty
|
|
|
1,611.1
|
|
|
|
1,413.2
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
$
|
10,383.0
|
|
|
$
|
9,411.5
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Net revenues for the fiscal year ended 2008 increased due to
growth in both Company-operated retail revenues and specialty
operations.
During fiscal 2008, Starbucks derived 84% of total net revenues
from its Company-operated retail stores. Company-operated retail
revenues increased, primarily attributable to the opening of 681
new Company-operated retail stores in the last 12 months,
offset by negative 3% comparable store sales for the same
period. Revenue growth was slower than in previous years due to
a combination of declining comparable store sales and a decrease
in the number of net new stores opened during fiscal 2008. The
weakness in consolidated comparable store sales was driven by
the US segment, which posted a comparable store sales decline of
5% for the year. Partially offsetting this was 2% comparable
store sales growth in the International segment. Within fiscal
2008, consolidated quarterly revenue
24
growth decelerated each quarter and comparable store sales
declined each quarter, reflecting the ongoing challenging
economic conditions in the US.
The Company derived the remaining 16% of total net revenues from
channels outside the Company-operated retail stores,
collectively known as specialty operations. Licensing revenues,
which are derived from retail store licensing arrangements as
well as grocery, warehouse club and certain other
branded-product operations, increased primarily due to higher
product sales and royalty revenues from the opening of 988 new
licensed retail stores in the last 12 months. The increase
in Foodservice and other revenues was primarily driven by growth
in new and existing accounts in the US foodservice business.
For fiscal 2009, the Company expects total revenues to be
relatively flat compared to fiscal 2008, with variations driven
by the level of comparable store sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28,
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28,
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total Net Revenues
|
|
|
Cost of sales including occupancy costs
|
|
$
|
4,645.3
|
|
|
$
|
3,999.1
|
|
|
|
16.2
|
%
|
|
|
44.7
|
%
|
|
|
42.5
|
%
|
Store operating
expenses(1)
|
|
|
3,745.1
|
|
|
|
3,215.9
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
36.1
|
|
|
|
34.2
|
|
Other operating
expenses(2)
|
|
|
330.1
|
|
|
|
294.2
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expenses
|
|
|
549.3
|
|
|
|
467.2
|
|
|
|
17.6
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
456.0
|
|
|
|
489.2
|
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
266.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nm
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
9,992.7
|
|
|
|
8,465.6
|
|
|
|
18.0
|
|
|
|
96.2
|
|
|
|
89.9
|
|
Income from equity investees
|
|
|
113.6
|
|
|
|
108.0
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
503.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,053.9
|
|
|
|
(52.2
|
)%
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As a percentage of related Company-operated retail revenues,
store operating expenses were 42.7% and 40.2% for the fiscal
years ended September 28, 2008 and September 30, 2007,
respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
As a percentage of related total specialty revenues, other
operating expenses were 20.5% and 20.8% for the fiscal years
ended September 28, 2008 and September 30, 2007,
respectively. |
As discussed in the Management Overview section above, many of
the Companys operating expenses are fixed in nature. As a
result, the softness in US revenues during fiscal 2008 impacted
nearly all consolidated and US segment operating expense line
items when viewed as a percentage of sales, and pressured
operating margins.
Cost of sales including occupancy costs increased primarily due
to higher distribution costs and higher rent expenses as a
percentage of revenues. Store operating expenses as a percentage
of Company-operated retail revenues increased primarily due to
higher payroll expenditures as a percentage of revenues coupled
with impairment provisions in the US business, primarily driven
by the slowdown in projected store openings. Depreciation and
amortization expenses increased primarily due to the opening of
681 new Company-operated retail stores in the last
12 months. General and administrative expenses decreased
primarily due to lower payroll-related expenses. Restructuring
charges include asset impairment, lease exit and severance
costs. These costs are associated with the closure of
underperforming stores in the US and Australia, and the
rationalization of the Companys leadership structure and
non-store organization. See Note 3 to the consolidated
financial statements for further discussion.
25
Operating margin compression was primarily due to lower
revenues; in addition, restructuring charges accounted for
approximately 40% of the decrease.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28,
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28,
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total Net Revenues
|
|
|
Interest income and other, net
|
|
$
|
9.0
|
|
|
$
|
40.4
|
|
|
|
(77.7
|
)%
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(53.4
|
)
|
|
|
(38.0
|
)
|
|
|
40.5
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
459.5
|
|
|
|
1,056.3
|
|
|
|
(56.5
|
)
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
144.0
|
|
|
|
383.7
|
|
|
|
(62.5
|
)
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
315.5
|
|
|
$
|
672.6
|
|
|
|
(53.1
|
)%
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income and other net, decreased due primarily to
unrealized market value losses on the Companys trading
securities portfolio. As described in more detail in Note 4
to the consolidated financial statements, the trading securities
approximate a portion of the Companys liability under its
Management Deferred Compensation Plan (MDCP). The
MDCP liability also increases and decreases with changes in
investment performance, with this offsetting impact recorded in
General and administrative expenses on the
consolidated statements of earnings. Interest expense increased
due to the Companys issuance of $550 million of
10-year
6.25% Senior Notes in August of fiscal 2007.
Income taxes for the fiscal year ended 2008 resulted in an
effective tax rate of 31.3% compared to 36.3% for fiscal 2007.
The lower rate is due to the higher proportion of income earned
in foreign jurisdictions which have lower tax rates, as well as
an increase in the domestic manufacturing deduction for
manufacturing activities in the US.
Operating
Segments
Segment information is prepared on the same basis that the
Companys management reviews financial information for
operational decision-making purposes. Starbucks has three
reportable operating segments: United States, International and
CPG. Unallocated Corporate includes expenses
pertaining to corporate administrative functions that support
the operating segments but are not specifically attributable to
or managed by any segment and are not included in the reported
financial results of the operating segments. Operating income
represents earnings before Interest income and other,
net, Interest expense and Income
taxes. The following tables summarize the Companys
results of operations by segment for fiscal 2008 and 2007 (in
millions).
United
States
The United States operating segment sells coffee and other
beverages, complementary food, whole bean coffees, and coffee
brewing equipment and merchandise primarily through
Company-operated retail stores. Specialty operations within the
United States include licensed retail stores, foodservice
accounts and other initiatives related to the Companys
core business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28,
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28,
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of US Total Net Revenues
|
|
|
Net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-operated retail
|
|
$
|
6,997.7
|
|
|
$
|
6,560.9
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
|
88.7
|
%
|
|
|
89.3
|
%
|
Specialty:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
504.2
|
|
|
|
439.1
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
Foodservice and other
|
|
|
385.1
|
|
|
|
349.0
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total specialty
|
|
|
889.3
|
|
|
|
788.1
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
$
|
7,887.0
|
|
|
$
|
7,349.0
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
26
Company-operated retail revenues increased primarily due to the
opening of 445 new Company-operated retail stores in the last
12 months, partially offset by a 5% decrease in comparable
store sales for fiscal 2008. The US Company-operated retail
business continued to experience deteriorating trends in
transactions during the year, driven by the US economic slowdown.
Licensing revenues increased primarily due to higher product
sales and royalty revenues as a result of opening 438 new
licensed retail stores in the last 12 months. Foodservice
and other revenues increased primarily due to growth in new and
existing foodservice accounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28,
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28,
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of US Total Net Revenues
|
|
|
Cost of sales including occupancy costs
|
|
$
|
3,371.7
|
|
|
$
|
2,956.2
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
|
|
42.8
|
%
|
|
|
40.2
|
%
|
Store operating
expenses(1)
|
|
|
3,081.0
|
|
|
|
2,684.2
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
|
|
|
39.1
|
|
|
|
36.5
|
|
Other operating
expenses(2)
|
|
|
219.6
|
|
|
|
204.8
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expenses
|
|
|
401.7
|
|
|
|
348.2
|
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
72.7
|
|
|
|
85.9
|
|
|
|
(15.4
|
)
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
210.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nm
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
7,357.6
|
|
|
|
6,279.3
|
|
|
|
17.2
|
|
|
|
93.3
|
|
|
|
85.4
|
|
Income from equity investees
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
528.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,070.5
|
|
|
|
(50.7
|
)%
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
|
14.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As a percentage of related Company-operated retail revenues,
store operating expenses were 44.0% and 40.9% for the fiscal
years ended September 28, 2008 and September 30, 2007,
respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
As a percentage of related total specialty revenues, other
operating expenses were 24.7% and 26.0% for the fiscal years
ended September 28, 2008 and September 30, 2007,
respectively. |
Operating margin contracted significantly primarily due to
restructuring charges incurred and to softer revenues due to
weak traffic, as well as higher cost of sales including
occupancy costs and higher store operating expenses as a
percentage of revenues. Restructuring charges of
$210.9 million had a 270 basis point impact on the
operating margin. The increase in cost of sales including
occupancy costs was primarily due to higher distribution costs
and higher rent expenses as a percentage of revenues. Higher
store operating expenses was due to the softer sales, higher
payroll-related expenditures, and charges from canceling future
store sites and asset impairments.
International
The International operating segment sells coffee and other
beverages, complementary food, whole bean coffees, and coffee
brewing equipment and merchandise through Company-operated
retail stores in Canada, the UK and nine other markets.
Specialty operations primarily include retail store licensing
operations in nearly forty other countries and foodservice
accounts, primarily in Canada and Japan. The Companys
International store base continues to increase and Starbucks
expects to achieve a growing contribution from established areas
of the business while at the same time investing in emerging
markets and channels. Many of the Companys International
operations are in early stages of development that require a
more extensive support organization, relative to the current
levels of revenue and operating income, than in the United
States. This continuing investment is part of the Companys
long-term, balanced plan for profitable growth.
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28,
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28,
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Revenues
|
|
|
Net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-operated retail
|
|
$
|
1,774.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,437.4
|
|
|
|
23.4
|
%
|
|
|
84.3
|
%
|
|
|
84.7
|
%
|
Specialty:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
274.8
|
|
|
|
220.9
|
|
|
|
24.4
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
Foodservice and other
|
|
|
54.4
|
|
|
|
37.9
|
|
|
|
43.5
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total specialty
|
|
|
329.2
|
|
|
|
258.8
|
|
|
|
27.2
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
$
|
2,103.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,696.2
|
|
|
|
24.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Company-operated retail revenues increased due to the opening of
236 new Company-operated retail stores in the last
12 months, favorable foreign currency exchange rates,
primarily on the Canadian dollar, and comparable store sales
growth of 2% for fiscal 2008. In the fourth quarter of fiscal
2008, Company-operated retail revenues grew at a slower rate
year-over-year of 12% and comparable store sales were flat
compared to the same quarter in fiscal 2007, both driven by
slowdowns in the UK and Canada, due to the weakening global
economy.
Specialty revenues increased primarily due to higher product
sales and royalty revenues from opening 550 new licensed retail
stores in the last 12 months.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28,
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28,
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Revenues
|
|
|
Cost of sales including occupancy costs
|
|
$
|
1,054.0
|
|
|
$
|
824.6
|
|
|
|
27.8
|
%
|
|
|
50.1
|
%
|
|
|
48.6
|
%
|
Store operating
expenses(1)
|
|
|
664.1
|
|
|
|
531.7
|
|
|
|
24.9
|
|
|
|
31.6
|
|
|
|
31.3
|
|
Other operating
expenses(2)
|
|
|
88.5
|
|
|
|
69.9
|
|
|
|
26.6
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expenses
|
|
|
108.8
|
|
|
|
84.2
|
|
|
|
29.2
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
113.0
|
|
|
|
93.8
|
|
|
|
20.5
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
19.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nm
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
2,047.6
|
|
|
|
1,604.2
|
|
|
|
27.6
|
|
|
|
97.3
|
|
|
|
94.6
|
|
Income from equity investees
|
|
|
54.2
|
|
|
|
45.7
|
|
|
|
18.6
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
110.0
|
|
|
$
|
137.7
|
|
|
|
(20.1
|
)%
|
|
|
5.2
|
%
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As a percentage of related Company-operated retail revenues,
store operating expenses were 37.4% and 37.0% for the fiscal
years ended September 28, 2008 and September 30, 2007,
respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
As a percentage of related total specialty revenues, other
operating expenses were 26.9% and 27.0% for the fiscal years
ended September 28, 2008 and September 30, 2007,
respectively. |
Operating margin decreased primarily due to higher cost of sales
including occupancy costs driven by continued expansion of lunch
and warming programs in Canada, higher distribution costs, and
higher building maintenance expense due to store renovation
activities. In addition, restructuring charges of
$19.2 million recognized in fiscal 2008 had a 90 basis
point impact on the operating margin, nearly all due to the
closure of 61 Company-operated stores in Australia.
Global
Consumer Products Group
The CPG operating segment sells a selection of whole bean and
ground coffees and premium
Tazo®
teas through licensing arrangements in United States and
international markets. CPG also produces and sells a variety of
ready-to-drink beverages through its joint ventures and
marketing and distribution agreements.
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28,
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28,
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of CPG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Revenues
|
|
|
Net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
$
|
392.6
|
|
|
$
|
366.3
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total specialty
|
|
|
392.6
|
|
|
|
366.3
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Total net revenues increased primarily due to higher royalties
and product sales in the international ready-to-drink business
and increased sales of US packaged tea and International club
packaged coffee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28,
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28,
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of CPG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Revenues
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
$
|
219.6
|
|
|
$
|
218.3
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
55.9
|
%
|
|
|
59.6
|
%
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
22.0
|
|
|
|
19.5
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
248.0
|
|
|
|
244.2
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
63.2
|
|
|
|
66.7
|
|
Income from equity investees
|
|
|
60.7
|
|
|
|
61.5
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
205.3
|
|
|
$
|
183.6
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
|
|
52.3
|
%
|
|
|
50.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Growth of operating margin was primarily due to lower cost of
sales as a percentage of related revenues, partially offset by
lower income from equity investees. Lower cost of sales was
primarily due to a sales mix shift to more profitable products.
Unallocated
Corporate
Unallocated corporate expenses pertain to corporate
administrative functions that support, but are not specifically
attributable to the Companys operating segments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28,
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28,
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of Total Net Revenues
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expenses
|
|
$
|
38.8
|
|
|
$
|
34.7
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
263.9
|
|
|
|
303.2
|
|
|
|
(13.0
|
)
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
36.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nm
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
$
|
(339.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(337.9
|
)
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unallocated corporate expenses remained relatively flat
due to lower payroll-related expenditures, which were offset by
restructuring charges incurred for corporate office facilities
that were no longer occupied by the Company due to the reduction
in positions within Starbucks leadership structure and non-store
organization.
29
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS FISCAL 2007 COMPARED TO FISCAL
2006
Consolidated
Results of Operations (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total Net Revenues
|
|
|
STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-operated retail
|
|
$
|
7,998.3
|
|
|
$
|
6,583.1
|
|
|
|
21.5
|
%
|
|
|
85.0
|
%
|
|
|
84.5
|
%
|
Specialty:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
1,026.3
|
|
|
|
860.6
|
|
|
|
19.3
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
Foodservice and other
|
|
|
386.9
|
|
|
|
343.2
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total specialty
|
|
|
1,413.2
|
|
|
|
1,203.8
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
$
|
9,411.5
|
|
|
$
|
7,786.9
|
|
|
|
20.9
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Net revenues for the fiscal year ended 2007 increased from
fiscal 2006, driven by increases in both Company-operated retail
revenues and specialty operations.
During the fiscal year ended 2007, Starbucks derived 85% of
total net revenues from its Company-operated retail stores.
Company-operated retail revenues increased primarily due to the
opening of 1,342 new Company-operated retail stores in the last
12 months and comparable store sales growth of 5% for the
fiscal year ended 2007. The increase in comparable store sales
was due to a 4% increase in the average value per transaction
and a 1% increase in the number of customer transactions.
The Company derived the remaining 15% of total net revenues from
channels outside the Company-operated retail stores,
collectively known as specialty operations. Licensing revenues,
which are derived from retail store licensing arrangements as
well as grocery, warehouse club and certain other
branded-product operations, increased primarily due to higher
product sales and royalty revenues from the opening of 1,229 new
licensed retail stores in the last 12 months and a 20%
increase in licensing revenues from the Companys CPG
business. Foodservice and other revenues increased due to growth
in new and existing accounts in the US foodservice business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total Net Revenues
|
|
|
Cost of sales including occupancy costs
|
|
$
|
3,999.1
|
|
|
$
|
3,178.8
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
%
|
|
|
42.5
|
%
|
|
|
40.8
|
%
|
Store operating
expenses(1)
|
|
|
3,215.9
|
|
|
|
2,687.8
|
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
|
|
34.2
|
|
|
|
34.5
|
|
Other operating
expenses(2)
|
|
|
294.2
|
|
|
|
253.7
|
|
|
|
16.0
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expenses
|
|
|
467.2
|
|
|
|
387.2
|
|
|
|
20.7
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
489.2
|
|
|
|
479.4
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
8,465.6
|
|
|
|
6,986.9
|
|
|
|
21.2
|
|
|
|
89.9
|
|
|
|
89.7
|
|
Income from equity investees
|
|
|
108.0
|
|
|
|
94.0
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
1,053.9
|
|
|
$
|
894.0
|
|
|
|
17.9
|
%
|
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As a percentage of related Company-operated retail revenues,
store operating expenses were 40.2% and 40.8% for the fiscal
years ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006,
respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
As a percentage of related total specialty revenues, other
operating expenses were 20.8% and 21.1% for the fiscal years
ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006,
respectively. |
30
Cost of sales including occupancy costs increased primarily due
to a shift in sales mix to higher cost products, the rise in
distribution costs, higher rent expense and higher dairy costs.
Dairy expense for the US segment represents approximately 75% of
the total Companys dairy expense. For the US segment the
average dairy costs per gallon rose 10% in fiscal 2007 compared
to fiscal 2006, resulting in approximately $20 million of
additional expense.
Store operating expenses as a percentage of Company-operated
retail revenues decreased primarily due to higher provisions for
incentive compensation in the prior year due to exceptionally
strong performance as well as leverage on regional overhead
costs in fiscal 2007. Other operating expenses decreased
primarily as a result of controlled discretionary spending in
fiscal 2007. Depreciation and amortization expenses increased
primarily due to the opening of 1,342 new Company-operated
retail stores in the last 12 months. General and
administrative expenses increased primarily due to higher
payroll-related expenditures in support of continued global
growth, offset in part by unusually high charitable
contributions in fiscal 2006. Income from equity investees
increased primarily due to higher equity income from
international investees.
Operating margin compression was due to higher costs of sales
and occupancy costs as a percentage of total net revenues due to
a shift in sales to higher cost products and higher distribution
costs, rent expense and dairy costs. These cost pressures were
offset in part by leveraging general and administrative
expenses, store operating expenses, and other operating expenses
as a percentage of total net revenues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total Net Revenues
|
|
|
Interest income and other, net
|
|
$
|
40.4
|
|
|
$
|
20.7
|
|
|
|
95.2
|
%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(38.0
|
)
|
|
|
(8.4
|
)
|
|
|
nm
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
1,056.3
|
|
|
|
906.3
|
|
|
|
16.6
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
383.7
|
|
|
|
324.8
|
|
|
|
18.1
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle
|
|
|
672.6
|
|
|
|
581.5
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change for FIN 47, net of
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.2
|
|
|
|
nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
672.6
|
|
|
$
|
564.3
|
|
|
|
19.2
|
%
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income and other, net, increased due to a higher amount
of income recognized on unredeemed stored value card and gift
certificate balances in fiscal 2007 compared to fiscal 2006.
Interest expense increased due to a higher level of borrowings
outstanding, which included the $550 million of Senior
Notes issued in August 2007.
Income taxes for the fiscal year ended 2007 resulted in an
effective tax rate of 36.3%, compared to 35.8% for fiscal 2006.
31
Operating
Segments (in millions):
United
States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of US Total Net Revenues
|
|
|
Net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-operated retail
|
|
$
|
6,560.9
|
|
|
$
|
5,495.2
|
|
|
|
19.4
|
%
|
|
|
89.3
|
%
|
|
|
88.9
|
%
|
Specialty:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
439.1
|
|
|
|
369.1
|
|
|
|
19.0
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
Foodservice and other
|
|
|
349.0
|
|
|
|
314.2
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total specialty
|
|
|
788.1
|
|
|
|
683.3
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
$
|
7,349.0
|
|
|
$
|
6,178.5
|
|
|
|
18.9
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Company-operated retail revenues increased primarily due to the
opening of 1,065 new Company-operated retail stores in the last
12 months and comparable store sales growth of 4% for
fiscal 2007, nearly all resulting from an increase in the
average value per transaction. The US Company-operated retail
business experienced deteriorating trends in transactions late
in the year, driven by, management believes, the US economic
slowdown combined with two price increases in US retail stores
implemented in fiscal 2007.
Licensing revenues increased primarily due to higher product
sales and royalty revenues as a result of opening 723 new
licensed retail stores in the last 12 months. Foodservice
and other revenues increased primarily due to growth in new and
existing foodservice accounts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of US Total Net Revenues
|
|
|
Cost of sales including occupancy costs
|
|
$
|
2,956.2
|
|
|
$
|
2,374.5
|
|
|
|
24.5
|
%
|
|
|
40.2
|
%
|
|
|
38.4
|
%
|
Store operating
expenses(1)
|
|
|
2,684.2
|
|
|
|
2,280.0
|
|
|
|
17.7
|
|
|
|
36.5
|
|
|
|
36.9
|
|
Other operating
expenses(2)
|
|
|
204.8
|
|
|
|
190.6
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expenses
|
|
|
348.2
|
|
|
|
284.6
|
|
|
|
22.3
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
85.9
|
|
|
|
93.8
|
|
|
|
(8.4
|
)
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
6,279.3
|
|
|
|
5,223.5
|
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
|
|
85.4
|
|
|
|
84.5
|
|
Income from equity investees
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
1,070.5
|
|
|
$
|
955.2
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
%
|
|
|
14.6
|
%
|
|
|
15.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As a percentage of related Company-operated retail revenues,
store operating expenses were 40.9% and 41.5% for the fiscal
years ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006,
respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
As a percentage of related total specialty revenues, other
operating expenses were 26.0% and 27.9% for the fiscal years
ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006,
respectively. |
Operating margin decreased due to higher cost of sales including
occupancy costs, primarily due to a shift in sales mix to higher
cost products such as food and merchandise, higher distribution
costs, higher rent expense and higher dairy costs. Partially
offsetting these were lower store operating expenses, lower
general and administrative expenses, and lower other operating
expenses as a percentage of total net revenues. The decline in
store operating expenses as a percentage of total net revenues
was primarily due to higher provisions for incentive
compensation in the prior year as well as leverage on regional
overhead costs in fiscal 2007. General and administrative
expenses were lower primarily due to decreased salary and
related benefits expense as well as lower professional fees. The
32
decline in other operating expenses as a percentage of total net
revenues was primarily due to controlled discretionary spending
in the current year.
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Revenues
|
|
|
Net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-operated retail
|
|
$
|
1,437.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,087.9
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
%
|
|
|
84.7
|
%
|
|
|
83.5
|
%
|
Specialty:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
220.9
|
|
|
|
186.0
|
|
|
|
18.8
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
Foodservice and other
|
|
|
37.9
|
|
|
|
29.0
|
|
|
|
30.7
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total specialty
|
|
|
258.8
|
|
|
|
215.0
|
|
|
|
20.4
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
$
|
1,696.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,302.9
|
|
|
|
30.2
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Company-operated retail revenues increased due to the opening of
277 new Company-operated retail stores in the last
12 months, comparable store sales growth of 7% for fiscal
2007 and favorable foreign currency exchange for the British
pound sterling. The increase in comparable store sales resulted
from a 5% increase in the number of customer transactions
coupled with a 2% increase in the average value per transaction.
Total specialty revenues increased primarily due to higher
product sales and royalty revenues from opening 506 new licensed
retail stores in the last 12 months.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International Total Net Revenues
|
|
|
Cost of sales including occupancy costs
|
|
$
|
824.6
|
|
|
$
|
625.0
|
|
|
|
31.9
|
%
|
|
|
48.6
|
%
|
|
|
48.0
|
%
|
Store operating
expenses(1)
|
|
|
531.7
|
|
|
|
407.8
|
|
|
|
30.4
|
|
|
|
31.3
|
|
|
|
31.3
|
|
Other operating
expenses(2)
|
|
|
69.9
|
|
|
|
50.9
|
|
|
|
37.3
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expenses
|
|
|
84.2
|
|
|
|
66.8
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
93.8
|
|
|
|
78.3
|
|
|
|
19.8
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
1,604.2
|
|
|
|
1,228.8
|
|
|
|
30.5
|
|
|
|
94.6
|
|
|
|
94.3
|
|
Income from equity investees
|
|
|
45.7
|
|
|
|
34.4
|
|
|
|
32.9
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
137.7
|
|
|
$
|
108.5
|
|
|
|
26.9
|
%
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As a percentage of related Company-operated retail revenues,
store operating expenses were 37.0% and 37.5% for the fiscal
years ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006,
respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
As a percentage of related total specialty revenues, other
operating expenses were 27.0% and 23.7% for the fiscal years
ended September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006,
respectively. |
Operating margin decreased primarily due to higher cost of sales
including occupancy costs due in part to a shift in sales mix to
higher cost products such as food and merchandise and higher
distribution costs. Partially offsetting this increase was lower
general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total net
revenues.
33
Global
Consumer Products Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of CPG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Revenues
|
|
|
Net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
$
|
366.3
|
|
|
$
|
305.5
|
|
|
|
19.9
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total specialty
|
|
|
366.3
|
|
|
|
305.5
|
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Total net revenues increased primarily due to increased sales of
US packaged coffee and tea as well as increased product sales
and royalties in the international ready-to-drink business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of CPG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Revenues
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
$
|
218.3
|
|
|
$
|
179.3
|
|
|
|
21.8
|
%
|
|
|
59.6
|
%
|
|
|
58.7
|
%
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
19.5
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
59.8
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expenses
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
244.2
|
|
|
|
198.0
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
|
|
|
66.7
|
|
|
|
64.8
|
|
Income from equity investees
|
|
|
61.5
|
|
|
|
59.4
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
19.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
183.6
|
|
|
$
|
166.9
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
50.1
|
%
|
|
|
54.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margin contraction was primarily due to slower growth
in income from The North American Coffee Partnership, an equity
investee, which produces ready-to-drink beverages.
Unallocated
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a % of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Revenues
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expenses
|
|
$
|
34.7
|
|
|
$
|
35.7
|
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
303.2
|
|
|
|
300.9
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
$
|
(337.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(336.6
|
)
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated corporate expenses as a percentage of total net
revenues decreased primarily as a result of leveraging of the
Companys scale and infrastructure against global growth.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Companys existing cash and liquid investments were
$322.3 million and $459.7 million as of
September 28, 2008 and September 30, 2007,
respectively. The decrease in liquid investments was driven
primarily by $59.8 million of auction rate securities,
nearly all of which are held within the Companys wholly
owned captive insurance company, that are not currently
considered liquid and were reclassified to long-term investments
in the second quarter of fiscal 2008.
34
Included in the cash and liquid investment balances are the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
A portfolio of unrestricted trading securities, designed to
hedge the Companys liability under its Management Deferred
Compensation Plan (MDCP). The value of this
portfolio was $49.5 million and $73.6 million as of
September 28, 2008 and September 30, 2007,
respectively. The decrease was driven by the sale of a bond
income fund to better align with the Companys total risk
profile and declines in market values of the underlying equity
funds, which were offset by a comparable decline in the MDCP
liability.
|
|
|
|
Unrestricted cash and liquid securities, held within the
Companys wholly owned captive insurance company, to fund
claim payouts. The value of these unrestricted cash and liquid
securities was approximately $35.6 million and
$98.1 million as of September 28, 2008 and
September 30, 2007, respectively. The decrease was due
primarily to reclassification of auction rate securities held by
the wholly owned captive.
|
As described in more detail in Note 4 to the consolidated
financial statements, as of September 28, 2008, the Company
had $74.4 million invested in available-for-sale
securities, consisting primarily of auction rate securities.
While the ongoing auction failures will limit the liquidity of
these investments for some period of time, the Company does not
believe the auction failures will materially impact its ability
to fund its working capital needs, capital expenditures or other
business requirements.
The Company manages the balance of its cash and liquid
investments in order to internally fund operating needs and make
scheduled interest and principal payments on its borrowings.
Following the Companys announcement on July 1, 2008 that
it planned to close approximately 600 underperforming
US Company-operated stores and reduce new store growth in
fiscal year 2009, Standard & Poors placed the
BBB+ long-term rating and
A-2 short
term ratings for Starbucks on CreditWatch with negative
implications. On July 3, 2008, Moodys placed the Baa1
senior unsecured rating for Starbucks on review for possible
downgrade, however Moodys reaffirmed the Companys
Prime-2 short-term rating for commercial paper. Standard and
Poors and Moodys subsequently downgraded the
long-term ratings as of September 4, 2008 and November 17,
2008, respectively.
Credit rating agencies currently rate the Companys
borrowings as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
Standard & Poors
|
|
|
Moodys
|
|
|
Short term debt
|
|
|
A-2
|
|
|
|
P-2
|
|
Senior unsecured long term debt
|
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
|
Baa2
|
|
Outlook
|
|
|
Stable
|
|
|
|
Negative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard & Poors downgraded the Companys
long-term rating from BBB+ to BBB on September 4, 2008, and
re-affirmed the
A-2
short-term rating. At the same time, Standard &
Poors outlook was changed to stable.
|
|
|
|
Moodys downgraded the Companys long-term rating from
Baa1 to Baa2 on November 17, 2008, and re-affirmed the
Companys Prime-2 short term rating for commercial paper.
At the same time, Moodys outlook was changed to negative.
|
Factors that may affect credit ratings include changes in the
Companys operating performance, the economic environment
and the Companys capital structure. In order to maintain
its credit ratings, there is an expectation that the Company
will modestly reduce its leverage during fiscal 2009. The
Company expects to improve its leverage ratio below a certain
target level primarily through the reduction in short term
borrowings. Credit rating downgrades can adversely impact, among
other things, future borrowing costs, access to capital markets,
and future operating lease terms. If either of the
Companys short-term ratings were downgraded, it would
likely make the issuance of commercial paper difficult. In these
circumstances the Company could draw upon its credit facility.
In normal market conditions, it is generally more favorable for
the Company to issue commercial paper rather than borrow against
the credit facility. However, as described in Item 1A Risk
Factors the ongoing global financial crisis may result in
conditions where commercial paper is not available at reasonable
rates. In such situations the Company is more likely to draw on
its credit facility. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008,
the Company borrowed against the credit facility as liquidity
conditions in the commercial paper market deteriorated. As of
September 28, 2008, borrowings outstanding under the credit
facility totaled $300 million.
35
The Companys credit facility contains provisions requiring
Starbucks to maintain compliance with certain covenants,
including a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. As of
September 28, 2008 and September 30, 2007, the Company
was in compliance with each of these covenants. On
October 31, 2008, the Company entered into an amendment to
the credit facility to exclude up to $130 million of lease
termination expenses and lease exit costs incurred during the
period beginning on June 30, 2008 and ending
September 27, 2009 from the agreements
Operating Lease and Rental Expense definition. The
purpose of the amendment was to limit the short-term effects of
lease-related restructuring expenses from the Companys
store closure actions on the fixed charge coverage ratio. These
expenses would have otherwise put pressure on the coverage ratio
and raised the risk of the Company losing access to liquidity.
Over the long term, the reduction in lease expense and
improvement in operating cash flows resulting from these store
closures are expected to have a favorable effect on this
coverage ratio. The amendment also increased the cost to borrow
under the facility by an additional 0.10% to 0.40%, depending on
the Companys fixed charge ratio and its senior unsecured
debt rating.
The $550 million of
10-year
6.25% Senior Notes, issued in the fourth quarter of fiscal
2007, also require Starbucks to maintain compliance with certain
covenants that limit future liens and sale and leaseback
transactions on certain material properties. As of
September 28, 2008 and September 30, 2007, the Company
was in compliance with each of these covenants.
The Company expects to use its cash and liquid investments,
including any borrowings under its revolving credit facility and
commercial paper program to invest in its core businesses,
including new beverage innovations, as well as other new
business opportunities related to its core businesses. The
Company may use its available cash resources to make
proportionate capital contributions to its equity method and
cost method investees. Any decisions to increase its ownership
interest in its equity method investees or licensed operations
will be driven by valuation and fit with the Companys
ownership strategy and are likely to be infrequent.
Depending on market conditions and within the constraint of
maintaining an appropriate capital structure, Starbucks may
repurchase shares of its common stock under its authorized share
repurchase program. Due to the current challenging operating and
economic environment, the Company continues to be conservative
in its uses of cash and did not repurchase any shares in the
second, third or fourth quarters of fiscal 2008. Management also
does not currently anticipate any share repurchases in fiscal
2009. Management believes that cash flows generated from
operations and existing cash and liquid investments should be
sufficient to finance capital requirements for its core
businesses for the foreseeable future, as well as to fund the
cost of lease termination and severance costs from the US and
Australia store closures. As a result, the Company expects to
decrease short-term borrowings in fiscal 2009. Significant new
joint ventures, acquisitions
and/or other
new business opportunities may require additional outside
funding.
Other than normal operating expenses, cash requirements for
fiscal 2009 are expected to consist primarily of capital
expenditures for new Company-operated retail stores, remodeling
and refurbishment of existing Company-operated retail stores,
and new equipment to support enhanced quality standards and
expanded offerings in the stores. Other capital expenditures in
fiscal 2009 are expected to consist principally of investments
in information technology systems and in the Companys
global supply chain operations. Total expenditures for fiscal
2009 are expected to be approximately $700 million.
Cash provided by operating activities decreased by
$72.5 million to $1.3 billion for fiscal 2008 compared
to the corresponding period of fiscal 2007. The modest decrease
was primarily due to the slowing pace of store construction
which led to a decline in the balance in accounts payable
year-over-year.
Cash used by investing activities for fiscal 2008 totaled
$1.1 billion. Net capital additions to property, plant and
equipment used $984.5 million, primarily from opening new
Company-operated retail stores and remodeling certain existing
stores during fiscal 2008. In addition, the sale and maturity of
available-for-sale securities provided $75.9 million and
$20.0 million, respectively, for fiscal 2008, consisting
primarily of auction rate securities and agency notes. The
auction rate securities were sold through the normal auction
process prior to the auction failures that began in mid-February
2008, as described in Note 4 to the consolidated financial
statements, and the agency notes, issued by government-sponsored
enterprises, were called in the first half of fiscal 2008.
Cash used by financing activities for fiscal 2008 totaled
$184.5 million. Cash used to repurchase shares of the
Companys common stock totaled $311.4 million, all in
the first quarter of fiscal 2008. This amount includes the
36
effect of the net change in unsettled trades from
September 30, 2007 of $16.1 million. Net repayments of
commercial paper were $297.2 million and net borrowings
under short term borrowings were $299.4 million for fiscal
2008. As of September 28, 2008, a total of
$713.2 million in borrowings were outstanding under the
combined commercial paper program and revolving credit facility,
as well as $15.9 million in letters of credit which were
outstanding under the credit facility, leaving
$270.9 million of capacity available under the
$1 billion combined commercial paper program and revolving
credit facility. Partially offsetting cash used for share
repurchases were proceeds of $112.3 million from the
exercise of employee stock options and the sale of the
Companys common stock from employee stock purchase plans.
As options granted are exercised, Starbucks will continue to
receive proceeds and a tax deduction, but the amount and the
timing of these cash flows cannot be reliably predicted as
option holders decisions to exercise options will be
largely driven by movements in the Companys stock price.
The following table summarizes the Companys contractual
obligations and borrowings as of September 28, 2008, and
the timing and effect that such commitments are expected to have
on the Companys liquidity and capital requirements in
future periods (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 1
|
|
|
1 - 3
|
|
|
3 - 5
|
|
|
More than
|
|
Contractual
Obligations(1)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Debt
obligations(2)
|
|
$
|
1,573.9
|
|
|
$
|
748.4
|
|
|
$
|
69.2
|
|
|
$
|
68.8
|
|
|
$
|
687.5
|
|
Operating lease
obligations(3)
|
|
|
5,098.1
|
|
|
|
741.0
|
|
|
|
1,367.2
|
|
|
|
1,151.1
|
|
|
|
1,838.8
|
|
Purchase
obligations(4)
|
|
|
682.3
|
|
|
|
575.5
|
|
|
|
93.2
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
Other
obligations(5)
|
|
|
102.3
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
78.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,456.6
|
|
|
$
|
2,069.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,540.8
|
|
|
$
|
1,239.6
|
|
|
$
|
2,607.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Liabilities for incomes taxes under FIN 48 were excluded as
the Company is not able to make a reasonably reliable estimate
of the amount and period of related future payments. As of
September 28, 2008, the Company had $52.6 million of
gross unrecognized tax benefits under FIN 48. |
|
(2) |
|
Debt amounts include principal maturities and expected interest
payments on commercial paper, credit facility borrowings, and
long-term debt. |
|
(3) |
|
Amounts include the direct lease obligations, excluding any
taxes, insurance and other related expenses. |
|
(4) |
|
Purchase obligations include agreements to purchase goods or
services that are enforceable and legally binding on Starbucks
and that specify all significant terms. Purchase obligations
relate primarily to green coffee. |
|
(5) |
|
Other obligations include other long-term liabilities primarily
consisting of asset retirement obligations, capital lease
obligations and hedging instruments. |
Starbucks expects to fund these commitments primarily with
operating cash flows generated in the normal course of business,
as well as ongoing borrowings under the combined commercial
paper program and revolving credit facility.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangement
The Companys off-balance sheet arrangements relate to
certain guarantees and are detailed in Note 17 to the
consolidated financial statements in this
10-K.
COMMODITY
PRICES, AVAILABILITY AND GENERAL RISK CONDITIONS
Commodity price risk represents the Companys primary
market risk, generated by its purchases of green coffee and
dairy products. The Company purchases, roasts and sells
high-quality whole bean arabica coffee and related products and
risk arises from the price volatility of green coffee. In
addition to coffee, the Company also purchases significant
amounts of dairy products to support the needs of its
Company-operated retail stores. The price and availability of
these commodities directly impacts the Companys results of
operations and can be expected to impact its future results of
operations. For additional details see Product Supply in
Item 1, as well as Risk Factors in Item 1A of this
10-K.
37
FINANCIAL
RISK MANAGEMENT
Market risk is defined as the risk of losses due to changes in
commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates, equity
prices, and interest rates. The Company manages its exposure to
various market-based risks according to an umbrella risk
management policy. Under this policy, market-based risks are
quantified and evaluated for potential mitigation strategies,
such as entering into hedging transactions. The umbrella risk
management policy governs the hedging instruments the business
may use and limits the dollar risk to net earnings. The Company
also monitors and limits the amount of associated counterparty
credit risk. Additionally, this policy restricts, among other
things, the amount of market-based risk the Company will
tolerate before implementing approved hedging strategies and
prohibits speculative trading activity. In general, hedge
instruments do not have maturities in excess of five years.
The sensitivity analyses performed below provide only a limited,
point-in-time
view of the market risk of the financial instruments discussed.
The actual impact of the respective underlying rates and price
changes on the financial instruments may differ significantly
from those shown in the sensitivity analyses.
Commodity
Price Risk
The Company purchases commodity inputs, including coffee and
dairy products that are used in its operations and are subject
to price fluctuations that impact its financial results. In
addition to fixed-priced contracts and price-to-be-fixed
contracts for coffee purchases, the Company may enter into
commodity hedges to manage commodity price risk using financial
derivative instruments. The Company performed a sensitivity
analysis based on a 10% change in the underlying commodity
prices of its commodity hedges, as of the end of fiscal 2008,
and determined that such a change would not have a significant
effect on the fair value of these instruments.
Foreign
Currency Exchange Risk
The majority of the Companys revenue, expense and capital
purchasing activities are transacted in US dollars. However,
because a portion of the Companys operations consists of
activities outside of the United States, the Company has
transactions in other currencies, primarily the Canadian dollar,
British pound sterling, euro, and Japanese yen. As a result,
Starbucks may engage in transactions involving various
derivative instruments to hedge revenues, inventory purchases,
assets, and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies.
As of September 28, 2008, the Company had forward foreign
exchange contracts that hedge portions of anticipated
international revenue streams and inventory purchases. In
addition, Starbucks had forward foreign exchange contracts that
qualify as accounting hedges of its net investment in Starbucks
Japan, as well as the Companys net investments in its
Canada, UK, and China subsidiaries, to minimize foreign currency
exposure.
The Company also had forward foreign exchange contracts that are
not designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes
(free standing derivatives), but which largely offset the
financial impact of translating certain foreign currency
denominated payables and receivables. Increases or decreases in
the fair value of these hedges are generally offset by
corresponding decreases or increases in the US dollar value of
the Companys foreign currency denominated payables and
receivables (i.e. hedged items) that would occur
within the hedging period.
The following table summarizes the potential impact to the
Companys future net earnings and other comprehensive
income (OCI) from changes in the fair value of these
derivative financial instruments due in turn to a change in the
value of the US dollar as compared to the level of foreign
exchange rates. The information provided below relates only to
the hedging instruments and does not represent the corresponding
changes in the underlying hedged items (in millions):
September 28,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase/(Decrease) to Net Earnings
|
|
Increase/(Decrease) to OCI
|
|
|
10% Increase in
|
|
10% Decrease in
|
|
10% Increase in
|
|
10% Decrease in
|
|
|
Underlying Rate
|
|
Underlying Rate
|
|
Underlying Rate
|
|
Underlying Rate
|
|
Foreign currency hedges
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
Equity
Security Price Risk
The Company has minimal exposure to price fluctuations on equity
mutual funds within its trading portfolio. The trading
securities approximate a portion of the Companys liability
under the MDCP. A corresponding liability is included in
Accrued compensation and related costs on the
consolidated balance sheets. These investments are recorded at
fair value with unrealized gains and losses recognized in
Interest income and other, net in the consolidated
statements of earnings. The offsetting changes in the MDCP
liability are recorded in General and administrative
expenses. The Company performed a sensitivity analysis
based on a 10% change in the underlying equity prices of its
investments, as of the end of fiscal 2008, and determined that
such a change would not have a significant effect on the fair
value of these instruments.
Interest
Rate Risk
The Company utilizes short-term and long-term financing and may
use interest rate hedges to manage the effect of interest rate
changes on its existing debt as well as the anticipated issuance
of new debt. At the end of fiscal years 2008 and 2007, the
Company did not have any interest rate hedge agreements
outstanding.
The following table summarizes the impact of a change in
interest rates on the fair value of the Companys debt
(in millions):
September 28,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
100 Basis Point Increase in
|
|
100 Basis Point Decrease in
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Underlying Rate
|
|
Underlying Rate
|
|
Debt
|
|
$
|
1,251
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys available-for-sale securities comprise a
diversified portfolio consisting mainly of fixed income
instruments. The primary objectives of these investments are to
preserve capital and liquidity. Available-for-sale securities
are investment grade and are recorded on the consolidated
balance sheets at fair value with unrealized gains and losses
reported as a separate component of Accumulated other
comprehensive income. The Company does not hedge the
interest rate exposure on its available-for-sale securities. The
Company performed a sensitivity analysis based on a
100 basis point change in the underlying interest rate of
its available-for-sale securities as of the end of fiscal 2008,
and determined that such a change would not have a significant
effect on the fair value of these instruments.
APPLICATION
OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Critical accounting policies are those that management believes
are both most important to the portrayal of the Companys
financial condition and results, and require managements
most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a
result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters
that are inherently uncertain. Judgments and uncertainties
affecting the application of those policies may result in
materially different amounts being reported under different
conditions or using different assumptions.
Starbucks considers its policies on asset impairment,
stock-based compensation, operating leases, self insurance
reserves and income taxes to be the most critical in
understanding the judgments that are involved in preparing its
consolidated financial statements.
Asset
Impairment
When facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying values
of long-lived assets may be impaired, an evaluation of
recoverability is performed by comparing the carrying values of
the assets to projected future cash flows, in addition to other
quantitative and qualitative analyses. For goodwill and other
intangible assets, impairment tests are performed annually and
more frequently if facts and circumstances indicate goodwill
carrying values exceed estimated reporting unit fair values and
if indefinite useful lives are no longer appropriate for the
Companys trademarks. Upon indication that the carrying
values of such assets may not be recoverable, the Company
recognizes an impairment loss as a charge against current
operations. Judgments made by the Company related to
39
the expected useful lives of long-lived assets and the ability
of the Company to realize undiscounted cash flows in excess of
the carrying amounts of such assets are affected by factors such
as the ongoing maintenance and improvements of the assets,
changes in economic conditions and changes in operating
performance. As the Company assesses the ongoing expected cash
flows and carrying amounts of its long-lived assets, these
factors could cause the Company to realize material impairment
charges.
Stock-based
Compensation
Starbucks accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance
with the fair value recognition provisions of
SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment. The
Company uses the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model which
requires the input of subjective assumptions. These assumptions
include estimating the length of time employees will retain
their stock options before exercising them (expected
term), the estimated volatility of the Companys
common stock price over the expected term and the number of
options that will ultimately not complete their vesting
requirements (forfeitures). Changes in the
subjective assumptions could materially affect the estimate of
fair value of stock-based compensation; however based on an
analysis using changes in certain assumptions that could be
reasonably possible in the near term, management believes the
effect on the expense recognized for fiscal 2008 would not have
been material.
Operating
Leases
Starbucks leases retail stores, roasting and distribution
facilities and office space under operating leases. The Company
provides for an estimate of asset retirement obligation
(ARO) expense at the lease inception date for
operating leases with requirements to remove leasehold
improvements at the end of the lease term. Estimating AROs
involves subjective assumptions regarding both the amount and
timing of actual future retirement costs. Future actual costs
could differ significantly from amounts initially estimated. In
addition, the large number of operating leases and the
significant number of international markets in which the Company
has operating leases adds administrative complexity to the
calculation of ARO expense, as well as to the other technical
accounting requirements of operating leases such as contingent
rent. Starbucks accounts for lease contract termination costs in
accordance with SFAS 146, Accounting for Costs
Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. Estimating
the cost of certain lease exit costs involves subjective
assumptions, including the time it would take to sublease the
leased location and the related potential sublease income. The
estimated accruals for these costs could be significantly
affected if future experience differs from that used in the
initial estimate.
Self
Insurance Reserves
The Company uses a combination of insurance and self-insurance
mechanisms, including a wholly owned captive insurance entity
and participation in a reinsurance pool, to provide for the
potential liabilities for workers compensation, healthcare
benefits, general liability, property insurance, director and
officers liability insurance and vehicle liability.
Liabilities associated with the risks that are retained by the
Company are not discounted and are estimated, in part, by
considering historical claims experience, demographic factors,
severity factors and other actuarial assumptions. The estimated
accruals for these liabilities could be significantly affected
if future occurrences and claims differ from these assumptions
and historical trends.
Income
Taxes
Starbucks accounts for income taxes in accordance with
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes,
which recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities based on
the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts
and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. Accruals for
uncertain tax positions are accounted for under FASB
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109 (FIN 48). Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are measured using current enacted tax
rates in effect for the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to reverse. Judgment is required in
determining the provision for income taxes and related accruals,
deferred tax assets and liabilities. These include establishing
a valuation allowance related to the realizability of certain
deferred tax assets. Accounting for uncertain tax positions
requires significant judgments, including estimating the amount,
timing and likelihood of ultimate settlement. Although the
Company believes that its estimates are reasonable, actual
results could differ from these estimates.
40
RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this
10-K.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to the section entitled Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Commodity Prices, Availability and
General Risk Conditions and Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Financial Risk Management in
Item 7 of this Report.
41
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
STARBUCKS
CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
In
millions, except earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sep 28, 2008
|
|
|
Sep 30, 2007
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
|
Net revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-operated retail
|
|
$
|
8,771.9
|
|
|
$
|
7,998.3
|
|
|
$
|
6,583.1
|
|
Specialty:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
1,171.6
|
|
|
|
1,026.3
|
|
|
|
860.6
|
|
Foodservice and other
|
|
|
439.5
|
|
|
|
386.9
|
|
|
|
343.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total specialty
|
|
|
1,611.1
|
|
|
|
1,413.2
|
|
|
|
1,203.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
|
10,383.0
|
|
|
|
9,411.5
|
|
|
|
7,786.9
|
|
Cost of sales including occupancy costs
|
|
|
4,645.3
|
|
|
|
3,999.1
|
|
|
|
3,178.8
|
|
Store operating expenses
|
|
|
3,745.1
|
|
|
|
3,215.9
|
|
|
|
2,687.8
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
330.1
|
|
|
|
294.2
|
|
|
|
253.7
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expenses
|
|
|
549.3
|
|
|
|
467.2
|
|
|
|
387.2
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
456.0
|
|
|
|
489.2
|
|
|
|
479.4
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
266.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
9,992.7
|
|
|
|
8,465.6
|
|
|
|
6,986.9
|
|
Income from equity investees
|
|
|
113.6
|
|
|
|
108.0
|
|
|
|
94.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
503.9
|
|
|
|
1,053.9
|
|
|
|
894.0
|
|
Interest income and other, net
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
40.4
|
|
|
|
20.7
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(53.4
|
)
|
|
|
(38.0
|
)
|
|
|
(8.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
459.5
|
|
|
|
1,056.3
|
|
|
|
906.3
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
144.0
|
|
|
|
383.7
|
|
|
|
324.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle
|
|
|
315.5
|
|
|
|
672.6
|
|
|
|
581.5
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change for FIN 47, net of
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
315.5
|
|
|
$
|
672.6
|
|
|
$
|
564.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle basic
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change for FIN 47, net of
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings basic
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
$
|
0.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle diluted
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
$
|
0.73
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change for FIN 47, net of
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings diluted
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
731.5
|
|
|
|
749.8
|
|
|
|
766.1
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
741.7
|
|
|
|
770.1
|
|
|
|
792.6
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
42
STARBUCKS
CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
In
millions, except per share data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28,
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
269.8
|
|
|
$
|
281.3
|
|
Short-term investments available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
83.8
|
|
Short-term investments trading securities
|
|
|
49.5
|
|
|
|
73.6
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
329.5
|
|
|
|
287.9
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
692.8
|
|
|
|
691.7
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
169.2
|
|
|
|
148.8
|
|
Deferred income taxes, net
|
|
|
234.2
|
|
|
|
129.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,748.0
|
|
|
|
1,696.5
|
|
Long-term investments available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
71.4
|
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
Equity and cost investments
|
|
|
302.6
|
|
|
|
258.9
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
2,956.4
|
|
|
|
2,890.4
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
261.1
|
|
|
|
219.4
|
|
Other intangible assets
|
|
|
66.6
|
|
|
|
42.1
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
266.5
|
|
|
|
215.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
5,672.6
|
|
|
$
|
5,343.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper and short-term borrowings
|
|
$
|
713.0
|
|
|
$
|
710.3
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
324.9
|
|
|
|
390.8
|
|
Accrued compensation and related costs
|
|
|
253.6
|
|
|
|
292.4
|
|
Accrued occupancy costs
|
|
|
136.1
|
|
|
|
74.6
|
|
Accrued taxes
|
|
|
76.1
|
|
|
|
92.5
|
|
Insurance reserves
|
|
|
152.5
|
|
|
|
137.0
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
164.4
|
|
|
|
160.3
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
368.4
|
|
|
|
296.9
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
2,189.7
|
|
|
|
2,155.6
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
549.6
|
|
|
|
550.1
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
442.4
|
|
|
|
354.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
3,181.7
|
|
|
|
3,059.8
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock ($0.001 par value) authorized,
1,200.0 shares; issued and outstanding, 735.5 and
738.3 shares, respectively (includes 3.4 common stock
units in both periods)
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
Other additional
paid-in-capital
|
|
|
39.4
|
|
|
|
39.4
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
2,402.4
|
|
|
|
2,189.4
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
48.4
|
|
|
|
54.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
2,490.9
|
|
|
|
2,284.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
$
|
5,672.6
|
|
|
$
|
5,343.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
43
STARBUCKS
CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
In
millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28,
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
315.5
|
|
|
$
|
672.6
|
|
|
$
|
564.3
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change for FIN 47, net of
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.2
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
604.5
|
|
|
|
491.2
|
|
|
|
412.6
|
|
Provision for impairments and asset disposals
|
|
|
325.0
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
Deferred income taxes, net
|
|
|
(117.1
|
)
|
|
|
(37.3
|
)
|
|
|
(84.3
|
)
|
Equity in income of investees
|
|
|
(61.3
|
)
|
|
|
(65.7
|
)
|
|
|
(60.6
|
)
|
Distributions of income from equity investees
|
|
|
52.6
|
|
|
|
65.9
|
|
|
|
49.2
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
75.0
|
|
|
|
103.9
|
|
|
|
105.7
|
|
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
Excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
(14.7
|
)
|
|
|
(93.1
|
)
|
|
|
(117.4
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
Cash provided/(used) by changes in operating assets and
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(48.6
|
)
|
|
|
(85.5
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(63.9
|
)
|
|
|
36.1
|
|
|
|
105.0
|
|
Accrued taxes
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
86.4
|
|
|
|
132.7
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
72.4
|
|
|
|
63.2
|
|
|
|
56.6
|
|
Other operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
60.3
|
|
|
|
22.2
|
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
1,258.7
|
|
|
|
1,331.2
|
|
|
|
1,131.6
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
(71.8
|
)
|
|
|
(237.4
|
)
|
|
|
(639.2
|
)
|
Maturity of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
178.2
|
|
|
|
269.1
|
|
Sale of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
75.9
|
|
|
|
47.5
|
|
|
|
431.2
|
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(74.2
|
)
|
|
|
(53.3
|
)
|
|
|
(91.7
|
)
|
Net purchases of equity, other investments and other assets
|
|
|
(52.0
|
)
|
|
|
(56.6
|
)
|
|
|
(39.2
|
)
|
Net additions to property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(984.5
|
)
|
|
|
(1,080.3
|
)
|
|
|
(771.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities
|
|
|
(1,086.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1,201.9
|
)
|
|
|
(841.0
|
)
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of commercial paper
|
|
|
(66,068.0
|
)
|
|
|
(16,600.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of commercial paper
|
|
|
65,770.8
|
|
|
|
17,311.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of short-term borrowings
|
|
|
(228.8
|
)
|
|
|
(1,470.0
|
)
|
|
|
(993.1
|
)
|
Proceeds from short-term borrowings
|
|
|
528.2
|
|
|
|
770.0
|
|
|
|
1,416.1
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
112.3
|
|
|
|
176.9
|
|
|
|
159.2
|
|
Excess tax benefit from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
93.1
|
|
|
|
117.4
|
|
Principal payments on long-term debt
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
549.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(311.4
|
)
|
|
|
(996.8
|
)
|
|
|
(854.0
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by financing activities
|
|
|
(184.5
|
)
|
|
|
(171.9
|
)
|
|
|
(155.3
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(11.5
|
)
|
|
|
(31.3
|
)
|
|
|
138.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
281.3
|
|
|
|
312.6
|
|
|
|
173.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
$
|
269.8
|
|
|
$
|
281.3
|
|
|
$
|
312.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, net of capitalized interest
|
|
$
|
52.7
|
|
|
$
|
35.3
|
|
|
$
|
10.6
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$
|
259.5
|
|
|
$
|
342.2
|
|
|
$
|
274.1
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
44
STARBUCKS
CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
In
millions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income/(Loss)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance, October 2, 2005
|
|
|
767.4
|
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
$
|
90.2
|
|
|
$
|
39.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,939.0
|
|
|
$
|
20.9
|
|
|
$
|
2,090.2
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
564.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
564.3
|
|
Unrealized holding gain, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Translation adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
580.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107.7
|
|
Exercise of stock options, including tax benefit of $116.8
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
235.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
235.3
|
|
Sale of common stock, including tax benefit of $1.9
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.7
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(25.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(475.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(352.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(828.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, October 1, 2006
|
|
|
756.6
|
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
39.4
|
|
|
$
|
2,151.1
|
|
|
$
|
37.3
|
|
|
$
|
2,228.5
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
672.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
672.6
|
|
Unrealized holding loss, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20.4
|
)
|
|
|
(20.4
|
)
|
Translation adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.7
|
|
|
|
37.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
689.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106.4
|
|
Exercise of stock options, including tax benefit of $95.3
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225.2
|
|
Sale of common stock, including tax provision of $0.1
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.8
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(33.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(378.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(634.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,012.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2007
|
|
|
738.3
|
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
39.4
|
|
|
$
|
2,189.4
|
|
|
$
|
54.6
|
|
|
$
|
2,284.1
|
|
Cumulative impact for adoption of FIN 48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
315.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
315.5
|
|
Unrealized holding gain, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
Translation adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.0
|
)
|
|
|
(7.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
309.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76.8
|
|
Exercise of stock options, including tax benefit of $8.4
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77.4
|
|
Sale of common stock, including tax benefit of $0.1
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41.9
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(12.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(194.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(295.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 28, 2008
|
|
|
735.5
|
|
|
$
|
0.7
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
39.4
|
|
|
$
|
2,402.4
|
|
|
$
|
48.4
|
|
|
$
|
2,490.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
45
STARBUCKS
CORPORATION
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Fiscal Years ended September 28, 2008,
September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006
|
|
Note 1:
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Description
of Business
Starbucks Corporation (together with its subsidiaries,
Starbucks or the Company) purchases and
roasts high-quality whole bean coffees and sells them, along
with fresh, rich-brewed coffees, Italian-style espresso
beverages, cold blended beverages, a variety of complementary
food items, a selection of premium teas, and coffee-related
accessories and equipment, primarily through its
Company-operated retail stores. Starbucks also sells coffee and
tea products and licenses its trademark through other channels
such as licensed stores, and, through certain of its equity
investees and licensees, Starbucks produces and sells a variety
of ready-to-drink beverages. All channels outside the
Company-operated retail stores are collectively known as
specialty operations. Additional details on the nature of the
Companys business is in Item 1 of this
10-K.
Starbucks has three reportable operating segments: United
States, International and Global Consumer Products Group
(CPG). See Note 18 for additional details.
Principles
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements reflect the financial
position and operating results of Starbucks, including wholly
owned subsidiaries and investees controlled by the Company.
Investments in entities that the Company does not control, but
has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating
and financial policies, are accounted for under the equity
method. Investments in entities in which Starbucks does not have
the ability to exercise significant influence are accounted for
under the cost method. Intercompany transactions and balances
have been eliminated.
Fiscal
Year End
Starbucks Corporations fiscal year ends on the Sunday
closest to September 30. Some fiscal years include
53 weeks. The fiscal years ended on September 28,
2008, September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006 included
52 weeks.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications of prior years balances have
been made to conform to the current format, including separately
presenting balances for Insurance reserves on the
consolidated balance sheet.
Estimates
and Assumptions
Preparing financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America
(GAAP) requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses. Actual results may differ
from these estimates.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with a
maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be
cash equivalents. The Company maintains cash and cash equivalent
balances with financial institutions that exceed federally
insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses
related to these balances, and management believes its credit
risk to be minimal.
Cash
Management
The Companys cash management system provides for the
funding of all major bank disbursement accounts on a daily basis
as checks are presented for payment. Under this system,
outstanding checks are in excess of the cash
46
balances at certain banks, which creates book overdrafts. Book
overdrafts are presented as a current liability in
Accounts payable on the consolidated balance sheets.
Short-term
and Long-term Investments
The Companys short-term and long-term investments consist
primarily of investment-grade debt securities as well as bond
and equity mutual funds, all of which are classified as
available-for-sale or trading. As of September 28, 2008, a
substantial portion of the Companys available-for-sale
investments consisted of auction rate securities, as described
in more detail in Note 4. Trading securities are recorded
at fair value with unrealized holding gains and losses included
in net earnings. Available-for-sale securities are recorded at
fair value, and unrealized holding gains and losses are
recorded, net of tax, as a separate component of accumulated
other comprehensive income. Available-for-sale securities with
remaining maturities of less than one year and those identified
by management at time of purchase for funding operations in less
than one year are classified as short-term, and all other
available-for-sale securities are classified as long-term.
Unrealized losses are charged against net earnings when a
decline in fair value is determined to be other than temporary.
Management reviews several factors to determine whether a loss
is other than temporary, such as the length of time a security
is in an unrealized loss position, the extent to which fair
value is less than amortized cost, the impact of changing
interest rates in the short and long term, the financial
condition and near term prospects of the issuer and the
Companys intent and ability to hold the security for a
period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery
in fair value. Realized gains and losses are accounted for on
the specific identification method. Purchases and sales are
recorded on a trade date basis.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximates
fair value because of the short-term maturity of those
instruments. The fair value of the Companys investments in
marketable debt and equity securities, as well as bond and
equity mutual funds, is based upon the quoted market price on
the last business day of the fiscal year. For equity securities
of companies that are privately held, or where an observable
quoted market price does not exist, the Company estimates fair
value using a variety of valuation methodologies. Such
methodologies include comparing the security with securities of
publicly traded companies in similar lines of business, applying
revenue multiples to estimated future operating results for the
private company and estimating discounted cash flows for that
company. Declines in fair value below the Companys
carrying value deemed to be other than temporary are charged
against net earnings. For further information on investments,
see Notes 4 and 7. The fair value of the Companys
debt is estimated based on the quoted market prices for the same
or similar issues or on the current rates offered to the Company
for debt of the same remaining maturities. The carrying value of
short-term debt approximates fair value. The estimated fair
value of Starbucks $550 million of 6.25% Senior Notes
was approximately $536 million.
Derivative
Instruments
The Company manages its exposure to various risks within the
consolidated financial statements according to an umbrella risk
management policy. Under this policy, Starbucks may engage in
transactions involving various derivative instruments, with
maturities generally not longer than five years, to hedge
interest rates, commodity prices, and foreign currency
denominated revenues, purchases, assets and liabilities.
The Company records all derivatives on the balance sheets at
fair value. For a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the
derivatives gain or loss is initially reported as a
component of other comprehensive income (OCI) and
subsequently reclassified into net earnings when the hedged
exposure affects net earnings. For a net investment hedge, the
effective portion of the derivatives gain or loss is
reported as a component of OCI.
Cash flow hedges related to anticipated transactions are
designated and documented at the inception of each hedge by
matching the terms of the contract to the underlying
transaction. The Company classifies the cash flows from hedging
transactions in the same categories as the cash flows from the
respective hedged items. Once established, cash flow hedges are
generally not removed until maturity unless an anticipated
transaction is no longer likely to occur. Discontinued or
dedesignated cash flow hedges are immediately settled with
counterparties, and the related accumulated derivative gains or
losses are recognized in Interest income and other,
net on the consolidated statements of earnings.
47
Forward contract effectiveness for cash flow hedges is
calculated by comparing the fair value of the contract to the
change in value of the anticipated transaction using forward
rates on a monthly basis. For net investment hedges, the
spot-to-spot method is used to calculate effectiveness. Under
this method, the change in fair value of the forward contract
attributable to the changes in spot exchange rates (the
effective portion) is reported as a component of OCI. The
remaining change in fair value of the forward contract (the
ineffective portion) is reclassified into net earnings. Any
ineffectiveness is recognized immediately in Interest
income and other, net on the consolidated statements of
earnings.
The Company also entered into foreign currency forward contracts
that are not designated as hedging instruments for accounting
purposes. These contracts are recorded at fair value, with the
changes in fair value recognized in Interest income and
other, net on the consolidated statements of earnings.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
Allowance for doubtful accounts is calculated based on
historical experience, customer credit risk and application of
the specific identification method. As of September 28,
2008 and September 30, 2007, the allowance for doubtful
accounts was $4.5 million and $3.2 million,
respectively.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (primarily moving
average cost) or market. The Company records inventory reserves
for obsolete and slow-moving items and for estimated shrinkage
between physical inventory counts. Inventory reserves are based
on inventory turnover trends, historical experience and
application of the specific identification method. As of
September 28, 2008 and September 30, 2007, inventory
reserves were $25.5 million and $14.9 million,
respectively.
Property,
Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost less
accumulated depreciation. Depreciation of property, plant and
equipment, which includes assets under capital leases, is
provided on the straight-line method over estimated useful
lives, generally ranging from two to seven years for equipment
and 30 to 40 years for buildings. Leasehold improvements
are amortized over the shorter of their estimated useful lives
or the related lease life, generally 10 years. For leases
with renewal periods at the Companys option, Starbucks
generally uses the original lease term, excluding renewal option
periods, to determine estimated useful lives. If failure to
exercise a renewal option imposes an economic penalty to
Starbucks, management may determine at the inception of the
lease that renewal is reasonably assured and include the renewal
option period in the determination of appropriate estimated
useful lives. The portion of depreciation expense related to
production and distribution facilities is included in Cost
of sales including occupancy costs on the consolidated
statements of earnings. The costs of repairs and maintenance are
expensed when incurred, while expenditures for refurbishments
and improvements that significantly add to the productive
capacity or extend the useful life of an asset are capitalized.
When assets are retired or sold, the asset cost and related
accumulated depreciation are eliminated with any remaining gain
or loss reflected in net earnings.
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and other intangible assets are tested for impairment
annually and more frequently if facts and circumstances indicate
goodwill carrying values exceed estimated reporting unit fair
values and if indefinite useful lives are no longer appropriate
for the Companys trademarks. Based on the impairment tests
performed, there was no impairment of goodwill or other
intangible assets in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006. Definite-lived
intangibles, which mainly consist of contract-based patents and
copyrights, are amortized over their estimated useful lives. For
further information on goodwill and other intangible assets, see
Note 9.
Long-lived
Assets
When facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying values
of long-lived assets may be impaired, an evaluation of
recoverability is performed by comparing the carrying values of
the assets to projected undiscounted future cash flows in
addition to other quantitative and qualitative analyses. Upon
indication that the carrying values of such
48
assets may not be recoverable, the Company recognizes an
impairment loss by a charge to net earnings. The fair value of
the assets is estimated using the discounted future cash flows
of the assets. Property, plant and equipment assets are grouped
at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows
when assessing impairment. Cash flows for retail assets are
identified at the individual store level. Long-lived assets to
be disposed of are reported at the lower of their carrying
amount, or fair value less estimated costs to sell.
The Company recognized net impairment and disposition losses of
$325.0 million, $26.0 million and $19.6 million
in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, due to
underperforming Company-operated retail stores, as well as
renovation and remodeling activity in the normal course of
business. The net losses in fiscal 2008 include
$201.6 million of asset impairments related to the US and
Australia store closures and charges incurred for office
facilities no longer occupied by the Company due to the
reduction in positions within Starbucks leadership structure and
non-store organization. See Note 3 for further details.
Depending on the underlying asset that is impaired, these losses
may be recorded in any one of the operating expense lines on the
consolidated statements of earnings: for retail operations,
these losses are recorded in Restructuring charges
and Store operating expenses; for specialty
operations, these losses are recorded in Other operating
expenses; and for all other operations, these losses are
recorded in Cost of sales including occupancy costs,
General and administrative expenses, or
Restructuring charges.
Insurance
Reserves
The Company uses a combination of insurance and self-insurance
mechanisms, including a wholly owned captive insurance entity
and participation in a reinsurance pool, to provide for the
potential liabilities for workers compensation, healthcare
benefits, general liability, property insurance, director and
officers liability insurance and vehicle liability.
Liabilities associated with the risks that are retained by the
Company are not discounted and are estimated, in part, by
considering historical claims experience, demographic factors,
severity factors and other actuarial assumptions.
Revenue
Recognition
Consolidated revenues are presented net of intercompany
eliminations for wholly owned subsidiaries and investees
controlled by the Company and for licensees accounted for under
the equity method, based on the Companys percentage
ownership. Additionally, consolidated revenues are recognized
net of any discounts, returns, allowances and sales incentives,
including coupon redemptions and rebates.
Stored
Value Cards
Revenues from the Companys stored value cards, such as the
Starbucks Card, and gift certificates are recognized when
tendered for payment, or upon redemption. Outstanding customer
balances are included in Deferred revenue on the
consolidated balance sheets. There are no expiration dates on
the Companys stored value cards or gift certificates, and
Starbucks does not charge any service fees that cause a
decrement to customer balances.
While the Company will continue to honor all stored value cards
and gift certificates presented for payment, management may
determine the likelihood of redemption to be remote for certain
card and certificate balances due to, among other things, long
periods of inactivity. In these circumstances, to the extent
management determines there is no requirement for remitting
balances to government agencies under unclaimed property laws,
card and certificate balances may be recognized in the
consolidated statements of earnings in Interest income and
other, net. For the fiscal years ended September 28,
2008, September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006, income
recognized on unredeemed stored value card balances and gift
certificates was $13.6 million, $12.9 million and
$4.4 million, respectively.
Retail
Revenues
Company-operated retail store revenues are recognized when
payment is tendered at the point of sale. Starbucks maintains a
sales return allowance to reduce retail revenues for estimated
future product returns, including brewing equipment, based on
historical patterns. Retail store revenues are reported net of
sales, use or other transaction taxes that are collected from
customers and remitted to taxing authorities.
49
Specialty
Revenues
Specialty revenues consist primarily of product sales to
customers other than through Company-operated retail stores, as
well as royalties and other fees generated from licensing
operations. Sales of coffee, tea and related products are
generally recognized upon shipment to customers, depending on
contract terms. Shipping charges billed to customers are also
recognized as revenue, and the related shipping costs are
included in Cost of sales including occupancy costs
on the consolidated statements of earnings.
Specific to retail store licensing arrangements, initial
nonrefundable development fees are recognized upon substantial
performance of services for new market business development
activities, such as initial business, real estate and store
development planning, as well as providing operational materials
and functional training courses for opening new licensed retail
markets. Additional store licensing fees are recognized when new
licensed stores are opened. Royalty revenues based upon a
percentage of reported sales and other continuing fees, such as
marketing and service fees, are recognized on a monthly basis
when earned. For certain licensing arrangements, where the
Company intends to acquire an ownership interest, the initial
nonrefundable development fees are deferred to Other
long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets
until acquisition, at which point the fees are reflected as a
reduction of the Companys investment.
Other arrangements involving multiple elements and deliverables
as well as upfront fees are individually evaluated for revenue
recognition. Cash payments received in advance of product or
service delivery are recorded in Deferred revenue
until earned.
Advertising
The Company expenses most advertising costs as they are
incurred, except for certain production costs that are expensed
the first time the advertising campaign takes place and
direct-response advertising, which is capitalized and amortized
over its expected period of future benefits. Direct-response
advertising consists primarily of customer acquisition expenses
including applications for customers to apply for the Starbucks
Card
Duetto®
Visa®.
These capitalized costs are amortized over the life of the
credit card which is estimated to be three years.
Total advertising expenses, recorded in Store operating
expenses, Other operating expenses and
General and administrative expenses on the
consolidated statements of earnings, totaled
$129.0 million, $103.5 million and $107.5 million
in fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. As of
September 28, 2008 and September 30, 2007,
$8.8 million and $12.0 million, respectively, of
capitalized advertising costs were recorded in Prepaid
expenses and other current assets and Other
assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
Research
and Development
Starbucks expenses research and development costs as they are
incurred. The Company spent approximately $7.2 million,
$7.0 million and $6.5 million during fiscal 2008, 2007
and 2006, respectively, on technical research and development
activities, in addition to customary product testing and product
and process improvements in all areas of its business.
Store
Preopening Expenses
Costs incurred in connection with the
start-up and
promotion of new store openings are expensed as incurred.
Operating
Leases
Starbucks leases retail stores, roasting and distribution
facilities and office space under operating leases. Most lease
agreements contain tenant improvement allowances, rent holidays,
lease premiums, rent escalation clauses
and/or
contingent rent provisions. For purposes of recognizing
incentives, premiums and minimum rental expenses on a
straight-line basis over the terms of the leases, the Company
uses the date of initial possession to begin amortization, which
is generally when the Company enters the space and begins to
make improvements in preparation of intended use.
50
For tenant improvement allowances and rent holidays, the Company
records a deferred rent liability in Accrued occupancy
costs and Other long-term liabilities on the
consolidated balance sheets and amortizes the deferred rent over
the terms of the leases as reductions to rent expense on the
consolidated statements of earnings.
For premiums paid upfront to enter a lease agreement, the
Company records a deferred rent asset in Prepaid expenses
and other current assets and Other assets on
the consolidated balance sheets and then amortizes the deferred
rent over the terms of the leases as additional rent expense on
the consolidated statements of earnings.
For scheduled rent escalation clauses during the lease terms or
for rental payments commencing at a date other than the date of
initial occupancy, the Company records minimum rental expenses
on a straight-line basis over the terms of the leases on the
consolidated statements of earnings.
Certain leases provide for contingent rents, which are
determined as a percentage of gross sales in excess of specified
levels. The Company records a contingent rent liability in
Accrued occupancy costs on the consolidated balance
sheets and the corresponding rent expense when specified levels
have been achieved or when management determines that achieving
the specified levels during the fiscal year is probable.
When ceasing operations in Company-operated stores under
operating leases, the Company accounts for any lease contract
termination costs in accordance with SFAS 146,
Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal
Activities. Accordingly, in cases where the lease contract
specifies a termination fee due to the landlord, the Company
records such expense at the time written notice is given to the
landlord. In cases where terms, including termination fees, are
yet to be negotiated with the landlord, the Company will record
the expense upon signing of an agreement with the landlord.
Finally, in cases where the landlord does not allow the Company
to prematurely exit its lease, but allows for subleasing, the
Company estimates the fair value of any sublease income that can
be generated from the location and records as an expense the
excess of remaining lease payments to the landlord over the
projected sublease income at the cease-use date.
Asset
Retirement Obligations
Starbucks accounts for asset retirement obligations under FASB
Interpretation No. 47 (FIN 47),
Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement
Obligations an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 143, which it adopted at the end of fiscal 2006.
FIN 47 requires recognition of a liability for the fair
value of a required asset retirement obligation
(ARO) when such obligation is incurred. The
Companys AROs are primarily associated with leasehold
improvements which, at the end of a lease, the Company is
contractually obligated to remove in order to comply with the
lease agreement. At the inception of a lease with such
conditions, the Company records an ARO liability and a
corresponding capital asset in an amount equal to the estimated
fair value of the obligation. The liability is estimated based
on a number of assumptions requiring managements judgment,
including store closing costs, cost inflation rates and discount
rates, and is accreted to its projected future value over time.
The capitalized asset is depreciated using the convention for
depreciation of leasehold improvement assets. Upon satisfaction
of the ARO conditions, any difference between the recorded ARO
liability and the actual retirement costs incurred is recognized
as an operating gain or loss in the consolidated statements of
earnings.
ARO expense was $6.5 million and $4.2 million, in
fiscal 2008 and 2007, respectively, with components included in
Costs of sales including occupancy costs, and
Depreciation and amortization expenses. The initial
impact of adopting FIN 47 at the end of fiscal year 2006
was a charge of $27.1 million, with a related tax benefit
of $9.9 million, for a net expense of $17.2 million,
with the net amount recorded as a cumulative effect of a change
in accounting principle on the consolidated statement of
earnings for fiscal year 2006. As of September 28, 2008 and
September 30, 2007, the Companys net ARO asset
included in Property, plant and equipment, net was
$18.5 million and $20.2 million, respectively, while
the Companys net ARO liability included in
Other long-term liabilities was $44.6 million
and $43.7 million, as of the same respective dates.
Stock-based
Compensation
The Company maintains several equity incentive plans under which
it may grant non-qualified stock options, incentive stock
options, restricted stock, restricted stock units
(RSUs) or stock appreciation rights to employees,
non-employee directors and consultants. The Company also has
employee stock purchase plans (ESPP). RSUs
51
issued by the Company are equivalent to nonvested shares, as
defined by SFAS 123(R), Share-Based Payment
(SFAS 123R). See Note 14 for additional
details.
Foreign
Currency Translation
The Companys international operations generally use their
local currency as their functional currency. Assets and
liabilities are translated at exchange rates in effect at the
balance sheet date. Income and expense accounts are translated
at the average monthly exchange rates during the year. Resulting
translation adjustments are recorded as a separate component of
Accumulated other comprehensive income on the
consolidated balance sheets.
Income
Taxes
The Company computes income taxes using the asset and liability
method, under which deferred income taxes are provided for the
temporary differences between the financial statement carrying
amounts and the tax basis of the Companys assets and
liabilities. The Company will establish a valuation allowance
for deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that these
items will either expire before the Company is able to realize
their benefits, or that future deductibility is uncertain.
Periodically, the valuation allowance is reviewed and adjusted
based on managements assessments of realizable deferred
tax assets.
On October 1, 2007, the first day of the Companys
first fiscal quarter of 2008, Starbucks adopted FASB
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109 (FIN 48). FIN 48
clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income tax positions
recognized in the financial statements in accordance with
SFAS No. 109. Under FIN 48, the Company may
recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if
it is more likely than not that the tax position will be
sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the
technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in
the financial statements from such a position should be measured
based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50%
likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
FIN 48 also provides guidance on measurement,
classification, interest and penalties associated with tax
positions, and income tax disclosures. The Company recognizes
interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income
tax expense. The cumulative effects of applying FIN 48 have
been recorded as a decrease of $1.7 million and
$1.6 million, respectively, to the Companys fiscal
2008 opening balances of retained earnings and additional
paid-in capital. See Note 15 for additional details.
Earnings
per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed on the basis of the
weighted average number of shares and common stock units that
were outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share
includes the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents
consisting of certain shares subject to stock options and RSUs,
using the treasury stock method.
Common
Stock Share Repurchases
The Company may repurchase shares of its common stock under a
program authorized by its Board of Directors including pursuant
to a contract, instruction or written plan meeting the
requirements of
Rule 10b5-1(c)(1)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In accordance with the
Washington Business Corporation Act, share repurchases are not
displayed separately as treasury stock on the consolidated
balance sheets or consolidated statements of shareholders
equity. Instead, the par value of repurchased shares is deducted
from Common stock and the remaining excess
repurchase price over par value is deducted from
Additional paid-in capital and from Retained
earnings, once additional paid-in capital is depleted. See
Note 13 for additional information.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157),
which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. For financial assets and liabilities,
SFAS 157 will be effective for Starbucks first fiscal
quarter of 2009. As permitted by
FSP-FAS 157-2,
SFAS 157 is effective for nonfinancial assets and
liabilities for Starbucks first fiscal quarter of 2010.
Starbucks believes the adoption of SFAS 157 for its
financial assets and liabilities will not have a material
52
impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements
and continues to evaluate the potential impact of the adoption
of SFAS 157 related to its nonfinancial assets and
liabilities.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities (SFAS 159). SFAS 159
permits companies to choose to measure many financial
instruments and certain other items at fair value. SFAS 159
will be effective for Starbucks first fiscal quarter of 2009.
Starbucks believes the adoption of SFAS 159 will not have a
material impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141
(revised 2007), Business Combinations
(SFAS 141R), which replaces SFAS 141.
SFAS 141R establishes principles and requirements for how
an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements
the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any
resulting goodwill, and any noncontrolling interest in the
acquiree. SFAS 141R also provides for disclosures to enable
users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and
financial effects of the business combination. SFAS 141R
will be effective for Starbucks first fiscal quarter of 2010 and
must be applied prospectively to business combinations completed
on or after that date.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 51 (SFAS 160),
which establishes accounting and reporting standards for
noncontrolling interests (minority interests) in
subsidiaries. SFAS 160 clarifies that a noncontrolling
interest in a subsidiary should be accounted for as a component
of equity separate from the parents equity. SFAS 160
will be effective for Starbucks first fiscal quarter of 2010 and
must be applied prospectively, except for the presentation and
disclosure requirements, which will apply retrospectively. The
Company is currently evaluating the potential impact that
adoption of SFAS 160 may have on its consolidated financial
statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 133 (SFAS 161), which requires
enhanced disclosures about an entitys derivative and
hedging activities. SFAS 161 will be effective for
Starbucks second fiscal quarter of 2009.
|
|
Note 2:
|
Business
Acquisitions
|
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company acquired
substantially all of the assets, including development and
operating rights, of Coffee Vision, Inc. (CVI) and
Coffee Vision Atlantic, Inc. (CVAI), its licensee in
Quebec and Atlantic Canada. In addition, Starbucks acquired full
development and operation rights for the retail stores in these
provinces.
In the third quarter of fiscal 2008, Starbucks purchased 100%
equity ownership in Coffee Equipment Company (CEC),
a Seattle-based manufacturer and seller of a single cup,
commercial grade coffee brewer called the
Clovertm.
In the second quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company purchased the
remaining 10% equity ownership in its operations in Beijing,
China. Starbucks has applied the consolidation method of
accounting since the first quarter of fiscal 2007, when it
acquired 90% of these previously-licensed operations.
|
|
Note 3:
|
Restructuring
Charges
|
In January of fiscal 2008, Starbucks began a transformation plan
designed to address the deterioration of its US retail business,
reduce its global infrastructure costs and position the
Companys business for long-term profitable growth. Since
the announcement, a number of actions have been initiated,
resulting in the recognition of certain exit, impairment and
severance costs. The total amount of these restructuring costs
recognized in fiscal 2008 was $266.9 million. Certain
additional costs from these actions are expected to be
recognized in fiscal 2009, nearly all related to US store
closures.
US Store Closures The most significant
action was the commitment to close approximately 600
underperforming Company-operated stores in the US market and
reduce the number of future store openings. The decision was a
result of a rigorous evaluation of the Company-operated store
portfolio, and the Company closed the first 205 of these stores
during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008. As a result of the
announced store closures and actions taken to
53
date, the Company recognized $206.3 million of
restructuring charges in fiscal 2008, comprised of
$169.6 million of store asset impairments, lease exit costs
of $33.6 million, and severance totaling $3.1 million.
The Company expects to complete the remainder of the closures by
the end of fiscal 2009, and recognize the total remaining lease
exit costs and related severance during that time.
Australia Store Closures To address the
difficulties specific to its Australia market, Starbucks closed
61 Company-operated stores in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008.
As a result of these store closures, the Company recognized
$16.9 million of restructuring charges in fiscal 2008,
comprised of $1.5 million of store asset impairments, lease
exit costs of $11.6 million, and severance totaling
$3.8 million. Starbucks continues to have wholly owned
operations in Australia but with a more focused presence with 23
Company-operated stores as of September 28, 2008.
Reduction in Force within the Non-store
Organization To address its global cost
structure, on July 29, 2008, Starbucks announced the
reduction of approximately 1,000 open and filled positions
within its leadership structure and its non-store organization.
As a result, the Company recognized, in fiscal 2008,
$10.7 million in employee termination benefits expense as
well as $33.0 million related to consolidation of support
facilities, primarily at the corporate headquarters in Seattle.
Restructuring charges by reportable segment were as follows
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Total expected costs
|
|
$
|
345.3
|
|
|
$
|
25.1
|
|
|
$
|
37.4
|
|
|
$
|
407.8
|
|
Expenses recognized in fiscal
2008(1)
|
|
|
210.9
|
|
|
|
19.2
|
|
|
|
36.8
|
|
|
|
266.9
|
|
Costs incurred in fiscal
2008(1)
|
|
|
225.7
|
|
|
|
19.2
|
|
|
|
36.8
|
|
|
|
281.7
|
|
Costs incurred to date
|
|
|
225.7
|
|
|
|
19.2
|
|
|
|
36.8
|
|
|
|
281.7
|
|
Restructuring charges by type and a reconciliation of the
associated accrued liability were as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease Exit
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Costs
|
|
|
Impairments
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Total expected costs
|
|
$
|
185.0
|
|
|
$
|
202.5
|
|
|
$
|
20.3
|
|
|
$
|
407.8
|
|
Expenses recognized in fiscal
2008(1)
|
|
|
47.8
|
|
|
|
201.6
|
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
|
|
266.9
|
|
Costs incurred in fiscal
2008(1)
|
|
|
62.6
|
|
|
|
201.6
|
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
|
|
281.7
|
|
Costs incurred to date
|
|
|
62.6
|
|
|
|
201.6
|
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
|
|
281.7
|
|
Accrued liability as of September 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Costs incurred in fiscal 2008, excluding non-cash charges and
credits(2)
|
|
|
72.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
|
|
89.9
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(24.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.1
|
)
|
|
|
(36.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liability as of September 28, 2008
|
|
$
|
48.0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.4
|
|
|
$
|
53.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The difference between expenses recognized and costs incurred in
fiscal 2008 represents deferred termination fees related to
stores not yet closed, for which termination agreements had been
finalized as of the end of the fiscal year. These costs are
being amortized to the date of closure. |
|
(2) |
|
Non-cash charges and credits for Lease Exit and Other
Related Costs represent deferred rent balances recognized
as expense credits at the
cease-use
date. |
54
|
|
Note 4:
|
Short-term
and Long-term Investments
|
The Companys short-term and long-term investments
consisted of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Holding
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
September 28, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
$
|
3.0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments trading securities
|
|
|
58.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments
|
|
$
|
61.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
52.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and local government obligations
|
|
$
|
65.8
|
|
|
$
|
(6.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
59.8
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term investments
|
|
$
|
77.9
|
|
|
$
|
(6.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
71.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and local government obligations
|
|
$
|
81.4
|
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
81.3
|
|
US government agency obligations
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
83.9
|
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
83.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments trading securities
|
|
|
67.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments
|
|
$
|
151.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
157.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US government agency obligations
|
|
$
|
21.0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
21.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For available-for-sale securities, proceeds from sales were
$75.9 million, $47.5 million and $431.2 million,
in fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Gross
realized gains from sales were $3.8 million in fiscal year
2006. Gross realized losses from sales were $0.1 million in
fiscal year 2006. For fiscal years 2008 and 2007, there were no
realized losses and immaterial amounts of realized gains from
sales.
As of September 28, 2008, the Companys long-term
available-for-sale securities of $71.4 million included
$59.8 million invested in auction rate securities
(ARS). As of September 30, 2007, the Company
held $75.6 million of ARS, which were all classified as
short-term available-for-sale securities. ARS have long-dated
maturities but provide liquidity through a Dutch auction process
that resets the applicable interest rate at pre-determined
calendar intervals. Due to the auction failures that began in
mid-February 2008, these securities became illiquid and were
classified as long-term investments. The investment principal
associated with the failed auctions will not be accessible until:
|
|
|
|
|
successful auctions resume;
|
|
|
|
an active secondary market for these securities develops;
|
|
|
|
the issuers replace these securities with another form of
financing; or
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
final payments are made according to the contractual maturities
of the debt issues which range from 22 to 37 years.
|
The Company intends to hold the ARS until it can recover the
full principal amount and has the ability to do so based on
other sources of liquidity. The Company expects such recoveries
to occur prior to the contractual maturities. In July 2008, one
of the Companys ARS was called at its par value of
$4.7 million.
The Company recorded $6.0 million of unrealized losses on
ARS in fiscal 2008, determined to be temporary, which is
included in accumulated other comprehensive income as a
reduction in shareholders equity. The Companys ARS
are collateralized by portfolios of student loans, substantially
all of which are guaranteed by the United States Department of
Education. As of September 28, 2008, approximately
$4.4 million in ARS was rated AA/Aa3 by
Standard & Poors and Moodys, respectively.
All of the remaining securities were rated triple-A by two or
more of the following major rating agencies: Moodys,
Standard & Poors and Fitch Ratings.
The following table presents the length of time
available-for-sale securities were in continuous unrealized loss
positions but were not deemed to be other-than-temporarily
impaired (in millions):
Consecutive
Monthly Unrealized Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater Than
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
or Equal to
|
|
|
|
12 Months
|
|
|
12 months
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Holding
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
September 28, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and local government obligations
|
|
$
|
(6.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
59.8
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(6.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
71.4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and local government obligations
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized holding losses on the state and local
obligations consist of unrealized losses on the Companys
twelve ARS. Gross unrealized holding losses on the corporate
debt pertain to five fixed income securities and were primarily
caused by interest rate increases subsequent to the date of
purchase. The contractual terms of the non-ARS fixed income
securities do not permit the issuer to settle at a price less
than the par value of the investment, which is the equivalent of
the amount due at maturity. As Starbucks has the ability and
intent to hold its available-for-sale securities until a
recovery of fair value, which may be at maturity, the Company
does not consider these securities to be other-than-temporarily
impaired. Long-term corporate debt securities generally mature
in less than five years.
There were no realized losses recorded for other than temporary
impairments during fiscal years 2008, 2007 or 2006.
Trading securities are comprised mainly of marketable equity
mutual funds that approximate a portion of the Companys
liability under the Management Deferred Compensation Plan
(MDCP), a defined contribution plan. The
corresponding deferred compensation liability of
$68.0 million in fiscal 2008 and $86.4 million in
fiscal 2007 is included in Accrued compensation and
related costs on the consolidated balance sheets. In
fiscal years 2008 and
56
2007, the changes in net unrealized holding gains/losses in the
trading portfolio included in earnings were a net loss of
$14.5 million and a net gain of $7.5 million,
respectively.
|
|
Note 5:
|
Derivative
Financial Instruments
|
Cash
Flow Hedges
The Company and certain subsidiaries enter into cash flow
derivative instruments to hedge portions of anticipated revenue
streams and inventory purchases in currencies other than the
entitys functional currency. Outstanding forward
contracts, which comprise the majority of the Companys
derivative instruments, hedge monthly forecasted revenue
transactions denominated in Japanese yen and Canadian dollars,
as well as forecasted inventory purchases denominated primarily
in US dollars for foreign operations. From time to time, the
Company also uses futures contracts to hedge the variable price
component for a small portion of its price-to-be-fixed green
coffee purchase contracts.
In addition, during fiscal 2007 the Company entered into,
dedesignated and settled forward interest rate contracts to
hedge movements in interest rates prior to issuance its
$550 million of 6.25% Senior Notes. The resulting net
losses from these contracts will continue to be reclassified to
Interest expense on the consolidated statements of
earnings over the life of the Senior Notes due in 2017. See
Note 10 for additional information on Senior Notes.
Including the interest rate contracts, the Company had
accumulated net derivative losses of $9.2 million, net of
taxes, in other comprehensive income as of September 28,
2008, related to cash flow hedges. Of this amount,
$3.6 million of net derivative losses pertain to hedging
instruments that will be dedesignated within 12 months and
will also continue to experience fair value changes before
affecting earnings. Ineffectiveness from hedges that were
discontinued in fiscal years 2008 and 2007 was insignificant. No
cash flow hedges were discontinued and no significant
ineffectiveness was recognized in fiscal year 2006. Outstanding
contracts will expire within 48 months.
Net
Investment Hedges
Net investment derivative instruments are used to hedge the
Companys equity method investment in Starbucks Coffee
Japan, Ltd. (Starbucks Japan) as well as the
Companys net investments in its Canada, UK and China
subsidiaries, to minimize foreign currency exposure. The Company
had accumulated net derivative losses of $13.0 million, net
of taxes, in other comprehensive income as of September 28,
2008, related to net investment derivative hedges. Outstanding
contracts expire within 29 months.
The following table presents the net gains and losses
reclassified from other comprehensive income into the
consolidated statements of earnings during the fiscal years
indicated for cash flow and net investment hedges (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28,
|
|
|
Sep 30,
|
|
|
Oct 1,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Cash flow hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassified (losses)/gains into total net revenues
|
|
$
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
1.5
|
|
Reclassified losses into cost of sales
|
|
|
(7.7
|
)
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
(7.7
|
)
|
Reclassified losses into interest expense
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reclassified losses cash flow hedges
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
Net investment hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassified gains into interest income and other, net
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(7.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
5.3
|
|
|
$
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Derivatives
The Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts that
are not designated as hedging instruments for accounting
purposes to mitigate the translation risk of certain balance
sheet items. For the fiscal years 2008 and 2007, these forward
contracts resulted in net losses of $0.1 million and
$9.7 million. These losses were largely offset
57
by the financial impact of translating foreign currency
denominated payables and receivables, which are also recognized
in Interest income and other, net. No similar
contracts were held in fiscal 2006.
Inventories consisted of the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sep 28, 2008
|
|
|
Sep 30, 2007
|
|
|
Coffee:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unroasted
|
|
$
|
377.7
|
|
|
$
|
339.5
|
|
Roasted
|
|
|
89.6
|
|
|
|
88.6
|
|
Other merchandise held for sale
|
|
|
120.6
|
|
|
|
175.5
|
|
Packaging and other supplies
|
|
|
104.9
|
|
|
|
88.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
692.8
|
|
|
$
|
691.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other merchandise held for sale includes, among other items,
brewing equipment, serveware and tea.
As of September 28, 2008, the Company had committed to
purchasing green coffee totaling $336 million under
fixed-price contracts and an estimated $246 million under
price-to-be-fixed contracts. The Company believes, based on
relationships established with its suppliers in the past, the
risk of non-delivery on such purchase commitments is remote.
|
|
Note 7:
|
Equity
and Cost Investments
|
The Companys equity and cost investments consisted of the
following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sep 28, 2008
|
|
|
Sep 30, 2007
|
|
|
Equity method investments
|
|
$
|
267.9
|
|
|
$
|
234.5
|
|
Cost method investments
|
|
|
34.7
|
|
|
|
24.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
302.6
|
|
|
$
|
258.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
Method
The Companys equity investees and ownership interests by
reportable operating segment are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sep 28, 2008
|
|
|
Sep 30, 2007
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
StarCon, LLC
|
|
|
50.0
|
%
|
|
|
50.0
|
%
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starbucks Coffee Korea Co., Ltd.
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
Starbucks Coffee Austria GmbH
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
Starbucks Coffee Switzerland AG
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
Starbucks Coffee España, S.L.
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
President Starbucks Coffee Taiwan Ltd.
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
Shanghai President Coffee Co.
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
Starbucks Coffee France SAS
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
Berjaya Starbucks Coffee Company Sdn. Bhd. (Malaysia)
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
49.9
|
|
Starbucks Brasil Comercio de Cafes Ltda.
|
|
|
49.0
|
|
|
|
49.0
|
|
Starbucks Coffee Japan, Ltd.
|
|
|
40.1
|
|
|
|
40.1
|
|
Starbucks Coffee Portugal Lda.
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The North American Coffee Partnership
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
Starbucks Ice Cream Partnership
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
|
|
50.0
|
|
58
StarCon, LLC is a joint venture formed in March 2007 with
Concord Music Group, Inc. that is engaged in the recorded music
business. The International entities operate licensed Starbucks
retail stores. The Company also has licensed the rights to
produce and distribute Starbucks branded products to two
partnerships in which the Company holds 50% equity interests:
The North American Coffee Partnership with the Pepsi-Cola
Company develops and distributes bottled
Frappuccino®
beverages and Starbucks
DoubleShot®
espresso drinks, and Starbucks Ice Cream Partnership with
Dreyers Grand Ice Cream, Inc. develops and distributes
superpremium ice creams.
Prior to fiscal 2005, Starbucks acquired equity interest in its
licensed operations of Malaysia, Austria, Shanghai, Spain,
Switzerland and Taiwan. The carrying amount of these investments
was $24.3 million more than the underlying equity in net
assets due to acquired goodwill, which is evaluated for
impairment annually. No impairment was recorded during fiscal
years 2008, 2007 or 2006.
The Companys share of income and losses is included in
Income from equity investees on the consolidated
statements of earnings. Also included is the Companys
proportionate share of gross margin resulting from coffee and
other product sales to, and royalty and license fee revenues
generated from, equity investees. Revenues generated from these
related parties, net of eliminations, were $128.1 million,
$107.9 million and $94.2 million in fiscal years 2008,
2007 and 2006, respectively. Related costs of sales, net of
eliminations, were $66.2 million, $57.1 million and
$47.5 million in fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. As of September 28, 2008 and
September 30, 2007, there were $40.6 million and
$30.6 million of accounts receivable, respectively, on the
consolidated balance sheets from equity investees primarily
related to product sales and store license fees.
As of September 28, 2008, the aggregate market value of the
Companys investment in Starbucks Japan was approximately
$214 million, based on its available quoted market price.
Summarized combined financial information of the Companys
equity method investees, that represent 100% of the
investees financial information, was as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Position as of
|
|
Sep 28, 2008
|
|
|
Sep 30, 2007
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
247.2
|
|
|
$
|
183.1
|
|
Noncurrent assets
|
|
|
604.9
|
|
|
|
408.6
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
273.5
|
|
|
|
166.4
|
|
Noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
59.8
|
|
|
|
56.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results of Operations for Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sep 28, 2008
|
|
|
Sep 30, 2007
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
1,961.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,452.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,303.5
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
171.3
|
|
|
|
186.2
|
|
|
|
152.3
|
|
Earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle
|
|
|
136.9
|
|
|
|
159.5
|
|
|
|
136.4
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
136.9
|
|
|
|
159.5
|
|
|
|
124.0
|
|
Cost
Method
The Company has equity interests in entities to develop and
operate Starbucks licensed retail stores in several global
markets, including Mexico, Hong Kong and Greece. Additionally,
Starbucks has investments in privately held equity securities
unrelated to Starbucks licensed retail stores of
$2.8 million at September 28, 2008 and
September 30, 2007. As of September 28, 2008 and
September 30, 2007, management determined that the
estimated fair values of each cost method investment exceeded
the related carrying values. There were no realized losses
recorded for other-than-temporary impairment of the
Companys cost method investments during fiscal years 2008,
2007 or 2006.
Starbucks has the ability to acquire additional interests in
some of these cost method investees at certain intervals.
Depending on the Companys total percentage of ownership
interest and its ability to exercise significant influence over
financial and operating policies, additional investments may
require the retroactive application of the equity method of
accounting.
59
|
|
Note 8:
|
Property,
Plant and Equipment
|
Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sep 28, 2008
|
|
|
Sep 30, 2007
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
59.1
|
|
|
$
|
56.2
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
217.7
|
|
|
|
161.7
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
3,363.1
|
|
|
|
3,179.6
|
|
Store equipment
|
|
|
1,045.3
|
|
|
|
1,007.0
|
|
Roasting equipment
|
|
|
220.7
|
|
|
|
208.8
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and other
|
|
|
517.8
|
|
|
|
477.9
|
|
Work in progress
|
|
|
293.6
|
|
|
|
215.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,717.3
|
|
|
|
5,306.5
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(2,760.9
|
)
|
|
|
(2,416.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
2,956.4
|
|
|
$
|
2,890.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 9:
|
Other
Intangible Assets and Goodwill
|
Other intangible assets consisted of the following (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sep 28, 2008
|
|
|
Sep 30, 2007
|
|
|
Indefinite-lived intangibles
|
|
$
|
58.3
|
|
|
$
|
36.9
|
|
Definite-lived intangibles
|
|
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Definite-lived intangibles, net
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other intangible assets
|
|
$
|
66.6
|
|
|
$
|
42.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Definite-lived intangibles approximate remaining weighted
average useful life in years
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
The increase in indefinite-lived intangibles was primarily due
to the purchase of distribution rights for Seattle Best
Coffee®
products in Canada as well as the CEC acquisition (see
Note 2). The increase in definite-lived intangibles was
primarily due to patents acquired in the CEC acquisition.
Amortization expense for definite-lived intangibles was
$1.5 million, $1.0 million and $1.2 million
during fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The following table summarizes, as of September 28, 2008,
the estimated amortization expense for each of the next five
fiscal years and thereafter (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ending
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
1.7
|
|
2010
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
2012
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
2013
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by reportable
operating segment for the fiscal year ended September 28,
2008 were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
Global CPG
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
127.6
|
|
|
$
|
78.3
|
|
|
$
|
9.7
|
|
|
$
|
215.6
|
|
Business Acquisitions
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
39.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51.1
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 28, 2008
|
|
$
|
139.4
|
|
|
$
|
117.4
|
|
|
$
|
9.7
|
|
|
$
|
266.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States
The $11.8 million increase in goodwill was due to the
acquisition of CEC.
International
The increase in goodwill was due to the acquisition of CVI and
CVAI, as well as the remaining equity interest in Beijing during
the fiscal year, which increased goodwill by $33.0 million
and $6.3 million, respectively (see Note 2). The
decrease related to Other was due to foreign
currency fluctuations.
The Companys debt consisted of the following (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 28, 2008
|
|
|
Sep 30, 2007
|
|
|
Commercial paper program (weighted average interest rate of 3.4%
and 5.4%, respectively)
|
|
$
|
413.0
|
|
|
$
|
710.3
|
|
Revolving credit facility (weighted average interest rate of
3.5%)
|
|
|
300.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
713.7
|
|
|
|
711.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.25%
10-year
Senior Notes (due Aug 2017)
|
|
|
549.2
|
|
|
|
549.0
|
|
Other long-term debt
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
549.6
|
|
|
|
550.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
1,263.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,261.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving
Credit Facility and Commercial Paper Program
The Company has a $1 billion unsecured credit facility (the
facility) with various banks, of which
$100 million may be used for issuances of letters of
credit. The facility is available for working capital, capital
expenditures and other corporate purposes, which may include
acquisitions and share repurchases. The facility is currently
set to terminate in August 2011. The interest rate for
borrowings under the facility as of September 28, 2008
ranged from 0.11% to 0.27% over LIBOR or an alternate base rate,
which is the greater of the bank prime rate or the Federal Funds
Rate plus 0.50%. On October 31, 2008, the Company entered
into an amendment to its facility that, amongst other changes,
increased the interest rate range for borrowings under the
facility to 0.21% to 0.67% over LIBOR or the greater of the bank
prime rate or the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%. The specific
spread over LIBOR will continue to depend upon the
Companys long-term credit ratings assigned by Moodys
and Standard & Poors rating agencies and the
Companys coverage ratio. The facility contains provisions
requiring the Company to maintain compliance with certain
covenants, including a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio which
measures the Companys ability to cover financing expenses.
The Company established a commercial paper program (the
program) in March 2007. Under the program the
Company may issue unsecured commercial paper notes, up to a
maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any time of
$1 billion, with individual maturities that may vary, but
not exceed 397 days from the date of issue. The program is
backstopped by the Companys revolving credit facility, and
the combined borrowing limit is $1 billion
61
for the program and the facility. The Company may issue
commercial paper from time to time, and the proceeds of the
commercial paper financing will be used for working capital
needs, capital expenditures and other corporate purposes, which
may include acquisitions and share repurchases.
As of September 28, 2008, the Company also had
$15.9 million in letters of credit outstanding under the
revolving credit facility, leaving a total of
$270.9 million in remaining borrowing capacity under the
combined revolving credit facility and commercial paper program.
As of September 30, 2007, letters of credit totaling
$12.9 million were outstanding.
Long-term
Debt
In August 2007, the Company issued $550 million of
6.25% Senior Notes (the notes) due in August
2017, in an underwritten registered public offering. Interest is
payable semi-annually on February 15 and August 15 of each year.
The notes require the Company to maintain compliance with
certain covenants, which limit future liens and sale and
leaseback transactions on certain material properties. The notes
were priced at a discount, resulting in proceeds to the Company
of $549 million, before expenses.
Other long term debt, totaling $0.4 million as of
September 28, 2008, matures in fiscal 2011.
Scheduled principal payments on long-term debt are as follows
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ending
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
2010
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
2011
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
550.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total principal payments
|
|
$
|
551.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
Expense
Interest expense, net of interest capitalized, was
$53.4 million, $38.2 million and $8.4 million in
fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. In fiscal 2008, 2007
and 2006, $7.2 million, $3.9 million and
$2.7 million, respectively, of interest was capitalized for
new store and other asset construction projects, and included in
Property, plant and equipment, net, on the
consolidated balance sheets.
|
|
Note 11:
|
Other
Long-term Liabilities
|
The Companys other long-term liabilities consisted of the
following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sep 28, 2008
|
|
|
Sep 30, 2007
|
|
|
Deferred rent
|
|
$
|
303.9
|
|
|
$
|
271.7
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits
|
|
|
60.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
44.6
|
|
|
|
43.7
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
18.3
|
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
Other
|
|
|
15.2
|
|
|
|
21.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
442.4
|
|
|
$
|
354.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred rent liabilities represent amounts for tenant
improvement allowances, rent escalation clauses and rent
holidays related to certain operating leases. The Company
amortizes deferred rent over the terms of the leases as
reductions to rent expense on the consolidated statements of
earnings. Unrecognized tax benefits represent the estimated
long-term portion of the Companys gross unrecognized tax
benefits including interest under FIN 48. See Notes 1
and 15 for additional information. Asset retirement obligations
represent the estimated fair value of the
62
Companys future costs of removing leasehold improvements
at the termination of leases for certain stores and
administrative facilities. Minority interest represents the
collective ownership interests of minority shareholders for
operations accounted for under the consolidation method, in
which Starbucks owns less than 100% of the equity interest. The
other remaining long-term liabilities generally include
obligations to be settled or paid for one year beyond each
period presented, for items such as hedging instruments and the
long-term portion of capital lease obligations.
Rental expense under operating lease agreements was as follows
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sep 28, 2008
|
|
|
Sep 30, 2007
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
|
Minimum rentals
|
|
$
|
683.4
|
|
|
$
|
587.2
|
|
|
$
|
458.7
|
|
Contingent rentals
|
|
|
57.7
|
|
|
|
50.9
|
|
|
|
40.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
741.1
|
|
|
$
|
638.1
|
|
|
$
|
498.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum future rental payments under noncancelable operating
leases as of September 28, 2008, were as follows
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ending
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
741.0
|
|
2010
|
|
|
706.6
|
|
2011
|
|
|
660.7
|
|
2012
|
|
|
604.6
|
|
2013
|
|
|
546.4
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,838.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
5,098.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has subleases related to certain of its operating
leases. During fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company
recognized sublease income of $3.5 million,
$3.6 million and $5.7 million, respectively.
The Company had capital lease obligations of $6.7 million
and $3.1 million as of September 28, 2008 and
September 30, 2007, respectively. Capital lease obligations
expire at various dates, with the latest maturity in 2018. The
current portion of the total obligation is included in
Other accrued expenses and the remaining long-term
portion is included in Other long-term liabilities
on the consolidated balance sheets. Assets held under capital
leases are included in Property, plant and equipment,
net, on the consolidated balance sheets.
The Company had $91.1 million and $73.7 million in
prepaid rent included in Prepaid expenses and other
current assets on the consolidated balance sheets as of
September 28, 2008 and September 30, 2007,
respectively.
Note 13: Shareholders
Equity
In addition to 1.2 billion shares of authorized common
stock with $0.001 par value per share, the Company has
authorized 7.5 million shares of preferred stock, none of
which was outstanding at September 28, 2008.
Share repurchase activity was as follows (in millions, except
for average price data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ending
|
|
Sep 28, 2008
|
|
|
Sep 30, 2007
|
|
|
Number of shares acquired
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
33.0
|
|
Average price per share of acquired shares
|
|
$
|
24.12
|
|
|
$
|
30.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrual-based cost of acquired shares
|
|
$
|
295.3
|
|
|
$
|
1,012.7
|
|
Total cash-based cost of acquired shares
|
|
$
|
311.4
|
|
|
$
|
996.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The difference between the accrual-based and cash-based cost of
acquired shares represents the effect of the net change in
unsettled trades from the prior fiscal year end. Share
repurchases were funded through cash, cash
63
equivalents, available-for-sale securities, borrowings under the
commercial paper program and revolving credit facility and
proceeds from sale of the notes, and were part of the
Companys active capital management program. As of
September 28, 2008, approximately 6.3 million shares
remained available for repurchase, under current authorizations.
Comprehensive
Income
Comprehensive income includes all changes in equity during the
period, except those resulting from transactions with
shareholders and subsidiaries of the Company. It has two
components: net earnings and other comprehensive income.
Accumulated other comprehensive income reported on the
Companys consolidated balance sheets consists of foreign
currency translation adjustments and the unrealized gains and
losses, net of applicable taxes, on available-for-sale
securities and on derivative instruments designated and
qualifying as cash flow and net investment hedges.
Comprehensive income, net of related tax effects, was as follows
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sep 28, 2008
|
|
|
Sep 30, 2007
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
315.5
|
|
|
$
|
672.6
|
|
|
$
|
564.3
|
|
Unrealized holding gains/(losses) on available-for-sale
securities, net of tax (provision)/benefit of $2.4, ($0.2) and
($1.3) in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively
|
|
|
(4.0
|
)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Unrealized holding gains/(losses) on cash flow hedging
instruments, net of tax (provision)/benefit of ($0.4), $7.5 and
$1.6 in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
(12.8
|
)
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)
|
Unrealized holding losses on net investment hedging instruments,
net of tax benefit of $0.6 and $5.2 in 2008 and 2007,
respectively
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(8.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for net (gains)/losses realized in
net earnings for available-for-sale securities, net of tax
provision of $1.1 in 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
Reclassification adjustment for net losses realized in net
earnings for cash flow hedges, net of tax benefit of $3.0, $0.5
and $2.4 in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gain/(loss)
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
(20.4
|
)
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Translation adjustment, net of tax benefit/(provision) of $0.3,
$, and ($1.8) in 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively
|
|
|
(7.0
|
)
|
|
|
37.7
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
309.3
|
|
|
$
|
689.9
|
|
|
$
|
580.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The unfavorable translation adjustment change during fiscal 2008
of $7.0 million was primarily due to the strengthening of
the US dollar against several currencies including the
Australian dollar, Korean won and Canadian dollar. The favorable
translation adjustment change during fiscal 2007 of
$37.7 million was primarily due to the weakening of the US
dollar against several currencies including the euro, Canadian
dollar and British pound sterling. The favorable translation
adjustment change during fiscal 2006 of $14.6 million was
primarily due to the weakening of the US dollar against several
currencies including British pound sterling, the euro and
Canadian dollar.
64
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of
tax, were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sep 28, 2008
|
|
|
Sep 30, 2007
|
|
|
Net unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities
|
|
$
|
(4.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Net unrealized losses on hedging instruments
|
|
|
(22.2
|
)
|
|
|
(27.1
|
)
|
Translation adjustment
|
|
|
74.7
|
|
|
|
81.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
48.4
|
|
|
$
|
54.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 28, 2008, the translation adjustment of
$74.7 million was net of tax provisions of
$7.0 million. As of September 30, 2007, the
translation adjustment of $81.7 million was net of tax
provisions of $7.3 million.
|
|
Note 14:
|
Employee
Stock and Benefit Plans
|
The Company maintains several equity incentive plans under which
it may grant non-qualified stock options, incentive stock
options, restricted stock, RSUs, or stock appreciation rights to
employees, non-employee directors and consultants. The Company
issues new shares of common stock upon exercise of stock options
and the vesting of RSUs. As of September 28, 2008, there
were 51.1 million shares of common stock available for
issuance pursuant to future equity-based compensation awards.
The Company also has employee stock purchase plans
(ESPP).
The following represents total stock based compensation and ESPP
expense recognized in the consolidated financial statements
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sep 28, 2008
|
|
|
Sep 30, 2007
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
|
Stock option expense
|
|
$
|
57.6
|
|
|
$
|
92.3
|
|
|
$
|
94.8
|
|
RSU expense
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ESPP expense
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense on the consolidated
statements of earnings
|
|
$
|
75.0
|
|
|
$
|
103.9
|
|
|
$
|
105.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total related tax benefit
|
|
$
|
24.0
|
|
|
$
|
35.3
|
|
|
$
|
36.1
|
|
Stock-based compensation capitalized in the respective fiscal
year, as included in Property, plant and equipment,
net and Inventories on the consolidated
balance sheets
|
|
$
|
1.9
|
|
|
$
|
2.5
|
|
|
$
|
2.1
|
|
The decrease in stock option expense in fiscal 2008 was due to a
higher level of forfeitures.
Stock
Option Plans
Stock options to purchase the Companys common stock are
granted at the fair market value of the stock on the date of
grant. The majority of options become exercisable in four equal
installments beginning a year from the date of grant and
generally expire 10 years from the date of grant. Certain
options granted prior to October 1, 2006 become exercisable
in three equal installments beginning a year from the date of
grant. Options granted to non-employee directors generally vest
over one to three years. Nearly all outstanding stock options
are non-qualified stock options.
The fair value of each stock option granted is estimated on the
grant date using the Black-Scholes-Merton (BSM)
option valuation model. The assumptions used to calculate the
fair value of options granted are evaluated and revised, as
necessary, to reflect market conditions and the Companys
experience. Options granted are valued using the multiple option
valuation approach, and the resulting expense is recognized
using the graded, or accelerated, attribution method, consistent
with the multiple option valuation approach. Compensation
expense is recognized only for those options expected to vest,
with forfeitures estimated at the date of grant based on the
Companys historical experience and future expectations.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 123R on October 3, 2005,
the effect of forfeitures on the disclosed pro forma expense
amounts was recognized as the forfeitures occurred.
65
The fair value of stock option awards and ESPP shares was
estimated at the grant date with the following weighted average
assumptions for the fiscal years ended September 28, 2008,
September 30, 2007 and October 1, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Stock Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted During the Period
|
|
|
ESPP
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
0.25 - 0.5
|
|
|
|
0.25 - 0.5
|
|
|
|
0.25 - 3.0
|
|
Expected stock price volatility
|
|
|
29.3
|
%
|
|
|
28.9
|
%
|
|
|
28.9
|
%
|
|
|
26% - 44%
|
|
|
|
28% - 31%
|
|
|
|
22% - 50%
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
4.4
|
%
|
|
|
1.3% - 4.5%
|
|
|
|
4.7% - 5.1%
|
|
|
|
2.3% - 5.0%
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
Weighted average grant price
|
|
$
|
22.11
|
|
|
$
|
36.04
|
|
|
$
|
30.52
|
|
|
$
|
14.52
|
|
|
$
|
24.59
|
|
|
$
|
26.81
|
|
Estimated fair value per option granted
|
|
$
|
6.85
|
|
|
$
|
11.72
|
|
|
$
|
9.59
|
|
|
$
|
4.00
|
|
|
$
|
6.03
|
|
|
$
|
6.60
|
|
The expected term of the options represents the estimated period
of time until exercise and is based on historical experience of
similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms,
vesting schedules and expectations of future employee behavior.
Expected stock price volatility is based on a combination of
historical volatility of the Companys stock and the
one-year implied volatility of its traded options, for the
related vesting periods. The risk-free interest rate is based on
the implied yield available on US Treasury zero-coupon issues
with an equivalent remaining term. The Company has not paid
dividends in the past and does not currently anticipate paying
any dividends in the near future.
The BSM option valuation model was developed for use in
estimating the fair value of traded options, which have no
vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. The
Companys employee stock options have characteristics
significantly different from those of traded options, and
changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially
affect the fair value estimate. Because Starbucks stock options
do not trade on a secondary exchange, employees do not derive a
benefit from holding stock options unless there is an increase,
above the grant price, in the market price of the Companys
stock. Such an increase in stock price would benefit all
shareholders commensurately.
66
The following summarizes all stock option transactions from
October 2, 2005, through September 28, 2008 (in
millions, except per share and contractual life amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Subject to
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Life (Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Outstanding, October 2, 2005
|
|
|
72.5
|
|
|
$
|
13.22
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
$
|
857.3
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
30.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(13.2
|
)
|
|
|
9.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/forfeited
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
|
24.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, October 1, 2006
|
|
|
69.4
|
|
|
|
16.83
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
1,196.2
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
36.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(12.7
|
)
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/forfeited
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
|
30.92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, September 30, 2007
|
|
|
65.5
|
|
|
|
20.97
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
507.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
|
|
22.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(6.6
|
)
|
|
|
10.71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/forfeited
|
|
|
(11.3
|
)
|
|
|
28.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, September 28, 2008
|
|
|
63.0
|
|
|
|
20.96
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
114.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, September 28, 2008
|
|
|
41.1
|
|
|
|
17.73
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
114.8
|
|
Vested and expected to vest, September 28, 2008
|
|
|
60.1
|
|
|
|
20.68
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
114.9
|
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above is the amount
by which the market value of the underlying stock exceeded the
exercise price of outstanding options, is before applicable
income taxes and represents the amount optionees would have
realized if all in-the-money options had been exercised on the
last business day of the period indicated. The closing per share
market value of the Companys stock on September 26,
2008 was $14.96.
As of September 28, 2008, total unrecognized stock-based
compensation expense related to nonvested stock options was
approximately $64.6 million, before income taxes, and is
expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
approximately 2.7 years. The total intrinsic value of stock
options exercised was $50 million, $274 million and
$327 million during the fiscal years ended
September 28, 2008, September 30, 2007 and
October 1, 2006, respectively. The total fair value of
options vested was $99 million, $28 million and
$95 million during fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
RSUs
RSUs are awarded to eligible employees and entitle the grantee
to receive shares of common stock at the end of a vesting
period, subject to the employees continuing employment.
The fair value of these service-based RSUs are based on the fair
value of Starbucks common stock on the award date. The following
table summarizes all RSU
67
transactions from October 1, 2006 through
September 28, 2008 (in millions, except per share and
contractual life amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Life (Years)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Nonvested, October 1, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
27.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/Cancelled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested, September 30, 2007
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
27.83
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
16.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/Cancelled
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
17.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested, September 28, 2008
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
17.36
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
30.5
|
|
As of September 28, 2008, total unrecognized stock-based
compensation expense related to nonvested RSUs was approximately
$29.4 million, before income taxes, which is expected to be
recognized over a weighted average period of approximately
3.5 years.
ESPP
The Companys ESPP allows eligible employees to contribute
up to 10% of their base earnings toward the quarterly purchase
of the Companys common stock, subject to an annual maximum
dollar amount. The employees purchase price is 85% of the
lesser of the fair market value of the stock on the first
business day or the last business day of the quarterly offering
period. The following summarizes transactions under this ESPP
from fiscal year 2006 through 2008 (shares in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price Per
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Issued during fiscal year 2006
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
$
|
26.81
|
|
Issued during fiscal year 2007
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
24.59
|
|
Issued during fiscal year 2008
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
14.52
|
|
Total number of shares issuable under the plan
|
|
|
32.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number of shares issued since inception
|
|
|
21.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares available for future issuance
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starbucks has an additional employee stock purchase plan in the
United Kingdom, which allows eligible UK employees to purchase
shares of common stock through payroll deductions during
six-month offering periods at the lesser of the fair market
value of the stock at the beginning or at the end of the
offering period. The Company awards one matching share for each
six shares purchased under the plan. The total number of shares
issuable under the plan is 1.4 million. As of
September 28, 2008, 1.3 million shares were available
for future issuance.
Deferred
Stock Plan
Starbucks has a deferred stock plan for certain key employees
that enables participants in the plan to defer receipt of
ownership of common shares from the exercise of nonqualified
stock options. The minimum deferral period is five years. As of
September 28, 2008, receipt of 3.4 million shares was
deferred under the terms of this plan. The rights to receive
these shares, represented by common stock units, are included in
the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share as
common stock equivalents. No new initial deferrals are permitted
under this plan; the plan permits re-deferrals of previously
deferred shares.
68
Defined
Contribution Plans
Starbucks maintains voluntary defined contribution plans, both
qualified and non-qualified, covering eligible employees as
defined in the plan documents. Participating employees may elect
to defer and contribute a portion of their eligible compensation
to the plans up to limits stated in the plan documents, not to
exceed the dollar amounts set by applicable laws. For employees
in the United States, the Company matched 25% to 150% of each
employees eligible contribution based on years of service,
up to a maximum of the first 4% of each employees
compensation. The Companys matching contributions to all
US and non-US plans were approximately $25.3 million,
$20.1 million and $19.3 million in fiscal years 2008,
2007 and 2006, respectively.
The provision for income taxes consisted of the following (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sep 28, 2008
|
|
|
Sep 30, 2007
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
|
Current taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
180.4
|
|
|
$
|
326.7
|
|
|
$
|
332.2
|
|
State
|
|
|
34.3
|
|
|
|
65.3
|
|
|
|
57.8
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
40.4
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
|
Deferred taxes, net
|
|
|
(111.1
|
)
|
|
|
(39.5
|
)
|
|
|
(77.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
144.0
|
|
|
$
|
383.7
|
|
|
$
|
324.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate with
the Companys effective income tax rate was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sep 28, 2008
|
|
|
Sep 30, 2007
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
|
Statutory rate
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Foreign earnings taxed at lower rates
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
Domestic production activity deduction
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
31.3
|
%
|
|
|
36.3
|
%
|
|
|
35.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US income and foreign withholding taxes have not been provided
on approximately $409 million of cumulative undistributed
earnings of foreign subsidiaries and equity investees. The
Company intends to reinvest these earnings for the foreseeable
future. If these amounts were distributed to the United States,
in the form of dividends or otherwise, the Company would be
subject to additional US income taxes. Determination of the
amount of unrecognized deferred income tax liabilities on these
earnings is not practicable because such liability, if any, is
dependent on circumstances existing if and when remittance
occurs.
69
The tax effect of temporary differences and carryforwards that
comprise significant portions of deferred tax assets and
liabilities was as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sep 28, 2008
|
|
|
Sep 30, 2007
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued occupancy costs
|
|
$
|
54.8
|
|
|
$
|
47.6
|
|
Accrued compensation and related costs
|
|
|
56.2
|
|
|
|
65.1
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
25.2
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
FIN 47 asset
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
36.0
|
|
|
|
18.3
|
|
Asset impairments
|
|
|
80.8
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
Foreign tax credits
|
|
|
26.1
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
79.6
|
|
|
|
66.8
|
|
Other
|
|
|
49.6
|
|
|
|
29.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
421.6
|
|
|
|
276.7
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(20.0
|
)
|
|
|
(13.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax asset, net of valuation allowance
|
|
|
401.6
|
|
|
|
263.0
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(18.1
|
)
|
|
|
(22.9
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(21.4
|
)
|
|
|
(23.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(39.5
|
)
|
|
|
(46.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
362.1
|
|
|
$
|
216.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred income tax asset
|
|
$
|
234.2
|
|
|
$
|
129.4
|
|
Long-term deferred income tax asset (included in Other
assets)
|
|
|
127.9
|
|
|
|
86.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
362.1
|
|
|
$
|
216.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company will establish a valuation allowance if it is more
likely than not that these items will either expire before the
Company is able to realize their benefits, or that future
deductibility is uncertain. Periodically, the valuation
allowance is reviewed and adjusted based on managements
assessments of realizable deferred tax assets. The valuation
allowance as of September 28, 2008 and September 30,
2007 was related to net operating losses of consolidated foreign
subsidiaries. The net change in the total valuation allowance
for the years ended September 28, 2008, and
September 30, 2007, was an increase of $6.3 million
and $4.9 million, respectively.
As of September 28, 2008, the Company has foreign tax
credit carryforwards of $26.2 million with expiration dates
between fiscal years 2013 and 2018. As of the end of fiscal
2008, the Company also has capital loss carryforwards of
$0.5 million, expiring in fiscal year 2010.
Taxes currently payable of $14.8 million and
$38.5 million are included in Accrued taxes on
the consolidated balance sheets as of September 28, 2008
and September 30, 2007, respectively.
FIN 48
As described in Note 1, on October 1, 2007, the first
day of the Companys fiscal 2008, Starbucks adopted
FIN 48. The cumulative effects of applying FIN 48 have
been recorded as a decrease of $1.7 million and
$1.6 million, respectively, to the Companys fiscal
2008 opening balances of retained earnings and additional
paid-in capital. The Company also recorded an increase of
$28.5 million to current income tax assets, an increase of
$12.2 million to
long-term
income tax assets, a decrease of $24.6 million to current
tax liabilities and an increase of $68.6 million to
long-term
tax liabilities.
70
As of September 28, 2008, the Company had
$52.6 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits of which
$21.4 million, if recognized, would affect the effective
tax rate. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related
to income tax matters in income tax expense. During fiscal 2008,
interest and penalties included in income tax expense was
$2.5 million. As of September 28, 2008 and
October 1, 2007, the Company had accrued interest and
penalties of $9.1 million and $11.4 million,
respectively, before benefit of federal tax deduction, recorded
on its consolidated balance sheets.
The following table summarizes the activity related to the
Companys unrecognized tax benefits from October 1,
2007 to September 28, 2008 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of October 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
58.3
|
|
Increase related to prior year tax positions
|
|
|
64.9
|
|
Decrease related to prior year tax positions
|
|
|
(37.2
|
)
|
Increase related to current year tax positions
|
|
|
17.0
|
|
Decrease related to current year tax positions
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
Decreases related to settlements with taxing authorities
|
|
|
(11.1
|
)
|
Decreases related to lapsing of statute of limitations
|
|
|
(33.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 28, 2008
|
|
$
|
52.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starbucks is currently under routine audit by various state
taxing jurisdictions for fiscal years 2003 through 2006. During
fiscal year 2008, the Company reached a settlement with the IRS
on its 2005 federal income tax examination. As a result,
unrecognized tax benefits were reduced by $11.1 million and
the tax provision was reduced by $6.5 million. The Company
reversed a portion of long-term taxes payable, which resulted in
recording a tax benefit in fiscal year 2008. The Company is no
longer subject to US federal or state examination for years
before fiscal year 2005, with the exception of nine states. As a
result of federal and certain state statute closures related to
fiscal year 2004, the Company reversed the long-term income
taxes payable, which resulted in recording an additional tax
benefit in the third quarter of fiscal year 2008. The Company is
subject to income tax in many jurisdictions outside the United
States, none of which are individually material to the
consolidated financial statements.
There is a reasonable possibility that the unrecognized tax
benefits will change within the next 12 months, but the
Company does not expect this change to be material to the
consolidated financial statements.
|
|
Note 16:
|
Earnings
per Share
|
The following table presents the calculation of net earnings per
common share (EPS) basic and diluted
(in millions, except EPS):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sep 28, 2008
|
|
|
Sep 30, 2007
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$
|
315.5
|
|
|
$
|
672.6
|
|
|
$
|
564.3
|
|
Weighted average common shares and common stock units
outstanding (for basic calculation)
|
|
|
731.5
|
|
|
|
749.8
|
|
|
|
766.1
|
|
Dilutive effect of outstanding common stock options and RSUs
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
20.3
|
|
|
|
26.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding
(for diluted calculation)
|
|
|
741.7
|
|
|
|
770.1
|
|
|
|
792.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPS basic
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
$
|
0.90
|
|
|
$
|
0.74
|
|
EPS diluted
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
$
|
0.87
|
|
|
$
|
0.71
|
|
Potential dilutive shares consist of the incremental common
shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding stock options
(both vested and non-vested) and unvested RSUs, using the
treasury stock method. Potential dilutive shares are excluded
from the computation of earnings per share if their effect is
antidilutive. The number of antidilutive
71
options and RSUs totaled 40.4 million, 10.4 million
and 10.3 million in fiscal years 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
|
|
Note 17:
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Guarantees
The Company has unconditionally guaranteed the repayment of
certain Japanese yen-denominated bank loans and related interest
and fees of an unconsolidated equity investee, Starbucks Japan.
The guarantees continue until the loans, including accrued
interest and fees, have been paid in full. The maximum amount is
limited to the sum of unpaid principal and interest amounts, as
well as other related expenses. These amounts will vary based on
fluctuations in the yen foreign exchange rate.
Starbucks has commitments under which it unconditionally
guarantees its proportionate share of certain borrowings of
unconsolidated equity investees. The Companys maximum
exposure under these commitments disclosed in the table below
excludes interest and other related costs. The fair value of
these guarantees are included in Equity and cost
investments and Other long-term liabilities on
the consolidated balance sheets.
The following table presents information on unconditional
guarantees as of September 28, 2008 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Estimate
|
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Year Guarantee
|
|
|
Recorded on
|
|
|
|
Exposure
|
|
|
Expires in
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
Japanese yen-denominated bank loans
|
|
$
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
$
|
|
(1)
|
Borrowings of other unconsolidated equity investees
|
|
$
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
2008 to 2012
|
|
|
$
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Since there has been no modification of these loan guarantees
subsequent to the Companys adoption of FASB Interpretation
No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure
Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of
Indebtedness of Others, Starbucks has applied the
disclosure provisions only and has not recorded the guarantees
on its consolidated balance sheets. |
Legal
Proceedings
On October 8, 2004, a former hourly employee of the Company
filed a lawsuit in San Diego County Superior Court entitled
Jou Chau v. Starbucks Coffee Company. The lawsuit
alleges that the Company violated the California Labor Code by
allowing shift supervisors to receive tips. More specifically,
the lawsuit alleges that since shift supervisors direct the work
of baristas, they qualify as agents of the Company
and are therefore excluded from receiving tips under California
Labor Code Section 351, which prohibits employers and their
agents from collecting or receiving tips left by patrons for
other employees. The lawsuit further alleges that because the
tipping practices violate the Labor Code, they also are unfair
practices under the California Unfair Competition Law. In
addition to recovery of an unspecified amount of tips
distributed to shift supervisors, the lawsuit seeks penalties
under California Labor Code Section 203 for willful failure
to pay wages due. Plaintiff also seeks attorneys fees and
costs. On February 28, 2008, the court ruled against the
Company in the liability phase of the trial and on
March 20, 2008 the court ordered the Company to pay
approximately $87 million in restitution, plus interest. On
July 31, 2008, the Company filed a notice of appeal with
the California Court of Appeals. Starbucks believes that while
the adverse ruling by the trial judge in this case makes the
possibility of loss somewhat more likely, the Company is only at
the very beginning of the appellate process. Starbucks believes
that the likelihood that the Company will ultimately incur a
loss in connection with this litigation is reasonably possible
rather than probable. The Company has not accrued any loss
related to this litigation.
On June 30, 2005, three individuals, Erik Lords, Hon Yeung,
and Donald Brown filed a lawsuit in Orange County Superior
Court, California. The lawsuit alleges that the Company violated
the California Labor Code section 432.8 by asking job
applicants to disclose at the time of application convictions
for marijuana related offenses more than two years old.
Plaintiffs also seek attorneys fees and costs. On
November 1, 2007, the Court issued an order certifying the
case as a class action, with the plaintiffs representing a class
of all persons who have applied for employment with Starbucks
Coffee Company in California since June 23, 2004 who cannot
claim damages in excess of $200. On November 15, 2007, the
court denied the Companys motion for summary judgment.
Starbucks
72
has appealed the denial of its motion for summary judgment and
the California Court of Appeals has agreed to hear the
Companys appeal. The Company cannot estimate the possible
loss to the Company, if any. No trial date has been set. The
Company believes its employment application complies with
California law, and the Company intends to vigorously defend the
lawsuit.
As previously disclosed in the Companys
Form 10-Q
for the Quarterly Period Ended June 29, 2008, two former
employees of the Company filed a lawsuit, entitled Sean
Pendlebury and Laurel Overton v. Starbucks Coffee Company,
in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of
Florida claiming the Company violated requirements of the Fair
Labor Standards Act (FLSA). In August 2008, the
Company and the plaintiffs agreed upon terms of a settlement
which was approved by the court on August 21, 2008.
The Company is party to various other legal proceedings arising
in the ordinary course of its business, but it is not currently
a party to any legal proceeding that management believes would
have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial
position or results of operations of the Company.
|
|
Note 18:
|
Segment
Reporting
|
Segment information is prepared on the same basis that the
Companys management reviews financial information for
operational decision making purposes. Starbucks has three
reportable operating segments: United States, International and
CPG.
United
States
The Companys United States operations represent 80% of
total Company-operated retail revenues, 55% of total specialty
revenues and 76% of total net revenues for fiscal year 2008.
United States operations sell coffee and other beverages,
complementary food, whole bean coffees, and coffee brewing
equipment and merchandise primarily through Company-operated
retail stores. Specialty operations within the United States
include licensed retail stores, foodservice accounts and other
initiatives related to the Companys core business.
International
The Companys International operations represent the
remaining 20% of Company-operated retail revenues and 21% of
total specialty revenues as well as 20% of total net revenues
for fiscal year 2008. International operations sell coffee and
other beverages, complementary food, whole bean coffees, and
coffee brewing equipment and merchandise through
Company-operated retail stores in the UK, Canada and nine other
markets. Specialty operations in International primarily include
retail store licensing operations in nearly 40 countries and
foodservice accounts, primarily in Canada and Japan. Many of the
Companys International operations are in early stages of
development that require a more extensive support organization,
relative to the current levels of revenue and operating income,
than in the United States.
Global
Consumer Products Group
The Companys CPG segment represents 24% of total specialty
revenues and 4% of total net revenues for fiscal year 2008. CPG
operations sell a selection of whole bean and ground coffees as
well as a selection of premium
Tazo®
teas through licensing arrangements in US and international
markets. CPG operations also produce and sell ready-to-drink
beverages which include, among others, bottled
Frappuccino®
beverages, Starbucks
DoubleShot®
espresso drinks, and
Discoveries®
chilled cup coffee, as well as
Starbucks®
superpremium ice creams and
Starbuckstm
Coffee and Cream Liqueurs, through its joint ventures and
marketing and distribution agreements.
Unallocated Corporate includes expenses pertaining to corporate
administrative functions that support the operating segments but
are not specifically attributable to or managed by any segment
and are not included in the reported financial results of the
operating segments. These unallocated corporate expenses include
certain general and administrative expenses, related
depreciation and amortization expenses, restructuring charges
and amounts included in Interest income and other,
net and Interest expense on the consolidated
statements of earnings.
73
The Companys revenue mix by product type was as follows
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sep 28, 2008
|
|
Sep 30, 2007
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
Beverage
|
|
$
|
6,663.3
|
|
|
64%
|
|
$
|
6,029.1
|
|
|
64%
|
|
$
|
5,043.4
|
|
|
65%
|
Food
|
|
|
1,511.7
|
|
|
15%
|
|
|
1,332.7
|
|
|
14%
|
|
|
1,024.3
|
|
|
13%
|
Coffee-making equipment and
other(1)
|
|
|
1,220.2
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
1,136.6
|
|
|
12%
|
|
|
918.2
|
|
|
12%
|
Whole bean coffees
|
|
|
987.8
|
|
|
9%
|
|
|
913.1
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
801.0
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
10,383.0
|
|
|
100%
|
|
$
|
9,411.5
|
|
|
100%
|
|
$
|
7,786.9
|
|
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Other includes royalty and licensing revenues |
The tables below represent information by geographic area (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sep 28, 2008
|
|
|
Sep 30, 2007
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
|
Net revenues from external customers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
8,227.0
|
|
|
$
|
7,678.9
|
|
|
$
|
6,478.1
|
|
Other countries
|
|
|
2,156.0
|
|
|
|
1,732.6
|
|
|
|
1,308.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
10,383.0
|
|
|
$
|
9,411.5
|
|
|
$
|
7,786.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No customer accounts for 10% or more of the Companys
revenues. Revenues are shown based on the geographic location of
the customers. Revenues from countries other than the United
States consist primarily of revenues from Canada and the UK,
which together account for approximately 69% of net revenues
from other countries for fiscal 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
Sep 28, 2008
|
|
|
Sep 30, 2007
|
|
|
Oct 1, 2006
|
|
|
Long-lived assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
3,099.9
|
|
|
$
|
2,990.6
|
|
|
$
|
2,446.1
|
|
Other countries
|
|
|
824.8
|
|
|
|
667.9
|
|
|
|
453.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,924.7
|
|
|
$
|
3,658.5
|
|
|
$
|
2,899.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management evaluates the performance of its operating segments
based on net revenues and operating income. The accounting
policies of the operating segments are the same as those
described in the summary of significant accounting policies in
Note 1. Operating income represents earnings before
Interest income and other, net, Interest
expense and Income taxes. Allocations of
portions of corporate overhead, interest or income taxes to the
segments are not significant. Identifiable assets by segment are
those assets used in the Companys operations in each
segment. Unallocated corporate assets include cash and
investments, unallocated assets of the corporate headquarters
and roasting facilities, deferred taxes and certain other
intangibles.
74
The table below presents information by operating segment for
the fiscal years noted (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
Global CPG
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-operated retail
|
|
$
|
6,997.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,774.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,771.9
|
|
Specialty:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
504.2
|
|
|
|
274.8
|
|
|
|
392.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,171.6
|
|
Foodservice and other
|
|
|
385.1
|
|
|
|
54.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439.5
|
|
Total specialty
|
|
|
889.3
|
|
|
|
329.2
|
|
|
|
392.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,611.1
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
|
7,887.0
|
|
|
|
2,103.4
|
|
|
|
392.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,383.0
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
401.7
|
|
|
|
108.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.8
|
|
|
|
549.3
|
|
Income (loss) from equity investees
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
54.2
|
|
|
|
60.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113.6
|
|
Operating income/(loss)
|
|
|
528.1
|
|
|
|
110.0
|
|
|
|
205.3
|
|
|
|
(339.5
|
)
|
|
|
503.9
|
|
Earnings/(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
541.6
|
|
|
|
119.4
|
|
|
|
205.3
|
|
|
|
(406.8
|
)
|
|
|
459.5
|
|
Equity method investments
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
223.6
|
|
|
|
44.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267.9
|
|
Identifiable assets
|
|
|
2,362.9
|
|
|
|
1,272.7
|
|
|
|
116.0
|
|
|
|
1,921.0
|
|
|
|
5,672.6
|
|
Net impairment and disposition losses
|
|
|
275.1
|
|
|
|
19.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.9
|
|
|
|
325.0
|
|
Net capital expenditures
|
|
|
534.7
|
|
|
|
253.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196.2
|
|
|
|
984.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-operated retail
|
|
$
|
6,560.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,437.4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,998.3
|
|
Specialty:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
439.1
|
|
|
|
220.9
|
|
|
|
366.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,026.3
|
|
Foodservice and other
|
|
|
349.0
|
|
|
|
37.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
386.9
|
|
Total specialty
|
|
|
788.1
|
|
|
|
258.8
|
|
|
|
366.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,413.2
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
|
7,349.0
|
|
|
|
1,696.2
|
|
|
|
366.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,411.5
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
348.2
|
|
|
|
84.2
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
34.7
|
|
|
|
467.2
|
|
Income from equity investees
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
45.7
|
|
|
|
61.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108.0
|
|
Operating income/(loss)
|
|
|
1,070.5
|
|
|
|
137.7
|
|
|
|
183.6
|
|
|
|
(337.9
|
)
|
|
|
1,053.9
|
|
Earnings/(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
1,079.7
|
|
|
|
147.2
|
|
|
|
183.6
|
|
|
|
(354.2
|
)
|
|
|
1,056.3
|
|
Equity method investments
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
196.9
|
|
|
|
36.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
234.5
|
|
Identifiable assets
|
|
|
2,454.6
|
|
|
|
1,116.1
|
|
|
|
91.6
|
|
|
|
1,681.6
|
|
|
|
5,343.9
|
|
Net impairment and disposition losses
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
|
Net capital expenditures
|
|
|
779.2
|
|
|
|
189.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111.3
|
|
|
|
1,080.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company-operated retail
|
|
$
|
5,495.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,087.9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,583.1
|
|
Specialty:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Licensing
|
|
|
369.1
|
|
|
|
186.0
|
|
|
|
305.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
860.6
|
|
Foodservice and other
|
|
|
314.2
|
|
|
|
29.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
343.2
|
|
Total specialty
|
|
|
683.3
|
|
|
|
215.0
|
|
|
|
305.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,203.8
|
|
Total net revenues
|
|
|
6,178.5
|
|
|
|
1,302.9
|
|
|
|
305.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,786.9
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
284.6
|
|
|
|
66.8
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
35.7
|
|
|
|
387.2
|
|
Income from equity investees
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
34.4
|
|
|
|
59.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94.0
|
|
Operating income/(loss)
|
|
|
955.2
|
|
|
|
108.5
|
|
|
|
166.9
|
|
|
|
(336.6
|
)
|
|
|
894.0
|
|
Earnings/(loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
957.7
|
|
|
|
109.5
|
|
|
|
166.9
|
|
|
|
(327.8
|
)
|
|
|
906.3
|
|
Equity method investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163.6
|
|
|
|
41.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205.0
|
|
Identifiable assets
|
|
|
1,996.3
|
|
|
|
746.4
|
|
|
|
94.1
|
|
|
|
1,592.1
|
|
|
|
4,428.9
|
|
Net impairment and disposition losses
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
19.6
|
|
Net capital expenditures
|
|
|
545.1
|
|
|
|
112.0
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
113.8
|
|
|
|
771.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Note 19:
|
Summarized
Quarterly Financial Information (unaudited, in millions, except
EPS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
2,767.6
|
|
|
$
|
2,526.0
|
|
|
$
|
2,574.0
|
|
|
$
|
2,515.4
|
|
|
$
|
10,383.0
|
|
Operating income/(loss)
|
|
|
333.1
|
|
|
|
178.2
|
|
|
|
(21.6
|
)(1)
|
|
|
14.2
|
(2)
|
|
|
503.9
|
|
Net earnings/(loss)
|
|
|
208.1
|
|
|
|
108.7
|
|
|
|
(6.7
|
)(1)
|
|
|
5.4
|
(2)
|
|
|
315.5
|
|
EPS diluted
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues
|
|
$
|
2,355.7
|
|
|
$
|
2,255.6
|
|
|
$
|
2,359.3
|
|
|
$
|
2,440.9
|
|
|
$
|
9,411.5
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
319.7
|
|
|
|
241.0
|
|
|
|
245.2
|
|
|
|
248.0
|
|
|
|
1,053.9
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
205.0
|
|
|
|
150.8
|
|
|
|
158.3
|
|
|
|
158.5
|
|
|
|
672.6
|
|
EPS diluted
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
0.19
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
0.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes pretax restructuring charges of $167.7 million. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes pretax restructuring charges of $99.2 million. |
76
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Starbucks
Corporation
Seattle, Washington
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Starbucks Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company)
as of September 28, 2008 and September 30, 2007, and
the related consolidated statements of earnings,
shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended September 28, 2008. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Starbucks Corporation and subsidiaries as of September 28,
2008 and September 30, 2007, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended September 28, 2008, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, on October 1, 2006, the Company changed its
method of accounting for conditional asset retirement
obligations upon adoption of Financial Accounting Standards
Board Interpretation No. 47, Accounting for
Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations - an interpretation of
FASB Statement No. 143.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
the Companys internal control over financial reporting as
of September 28, 2008, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
and our report dated November 24, 2008 expressed an
unqualified opinion on the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Seattle, Washington
November 24, 2008
77
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
Not applicable.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that
are designed to ensure that material information required to be
disclosed in the Companys periodic reports filed or
submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act), is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
SECs rules and forms. Starbucks disclosure controls and
procedures are also designed to ensure that information required
to be disclosed in the reports the Company files or submits
under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the
Companys management, including its principal executive
officer and principal financial officer as appropriate, to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
During the fourth quarter the Company carried out an evaluation,
under the supervision and with the participation of the
Companys management, including the chief executive officer
and the chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, the
Companys chief executive officer and chief financial
officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls
and procedures were effective, as of the end of the period
covered by this report (September 28, 2008).
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, there were no changes
in the Companys internal control over financial reporting
(as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f) of
the Exchange Act) that materially affected or are reasonably
likely to materially affect internal control over financial
reporting.
The certifications required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are filed as exhibits 31.1 and
31.2, respectively, to this
10-K.
Report of
Management on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
The management of Starbucks is responsible for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.
Internal control over financial reporting is a process to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our
financial reporting for external purposes in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. Internal control over financial
reporting includes maintaining records that in reasonable detail
accurately and fairly reflect our transactions; providing
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary
for preparation of our financial statements; providing
reasonable assurance that receipts and expenditures are made in
accordance with management authorization; and providing
reasonable assurance that unauthorized acquisition, use or
disposition of company assets that could have a material effect
on our financial statements would be prevented or detected on a
timely basis. Because of its inherent limitations, internal
control over financial reporting is not intended to provide
absolute assurance that a misstatement of our financial
statements would be prevented or detected.
Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting based on the framework
and criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. This evaluation
included review of the documentation of controls, evaluation of
the design effectiveness of controls, testing of the operating
effectiveness of controls and a conclusion on this evaluation.
Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the
Companys internal control over financial reporting was
effective as of September 28, 2008.
The Companys internal control over financial reporting as
of September 28, 2008, has been audited by
Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is
included herein.
78
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Starbucks
Corporation
Seattle, Washington
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of
Starbucks Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company)
as of September 28, 2008, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. The Companys management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Report of
Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys
internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
companys principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected
by the companys board of directors, management, and other
personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over
financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or
improper management override of controls, material misstatements
due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting
to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of September 28, 2008, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year
ended September 28, 2008, of the Company and our report
dated November 24, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion on
those financial statements.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Seattle, Washington
November 24, 2008
79
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
PART III
As used in this Part III, Starbucks and the
Company mean Starbucks Corporation.
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
The information required by this item regarding the
Companys directors is incorporated herein by reference to
the sections entitled Proposal 1 Election
Of Directors and Executive Compensation
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance and Corporate Governance
Board Committees and Related Matters in the Companys
definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held on March 18, 2009 (the Proxy
Statement). Information regarding the Companys
executive officers is set forth in Item 4 of Part 1 of
this Report under the caption Executive Officers of the
Registrant.
The Company adopted a code of ethics applicable to its chief
executive officer, chief financial officer, controller and other
finance leaders, which is a code of ethics as
defined by applicable rules of the SEC. This code is publicly
available on the Companys website at
www.starbucks.com/aboutus/corporate_governance.asp. If the
Company makes any amendments to this code other than technical,
administrative or other non-substantive amendments, or grants
any waivers, including implicit waivers, from a provision of
this code to the Companys chief executive officer, chief
financial officer or controller, the Company will disclose the
nature of the amendment or waiver, its effective date and to
whom it applies on its website or in a report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to the sections entitled Executive
Compensation and Corporate Governance
Compensation Committee in the Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Shareholder Matters
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to the sections entitled Beneficial Ownership of
Common Stock and Executive Compensation
Equity Compensation Plan Information in the Proxy
Statement.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to the section entitled Executive
Compensation Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions and Corporate Governance
Affirmative Determinations Regarding Director Independence and
Other Matters in the Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to the sections entitled Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm Fees and Policy on Audit
Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit
Services of the Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm in the Proxy Statement.
80
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
(a) The following documents are filed as a part of this
10-K:
The following financial statements are included in Part II,
Item 8 of this
10-K:
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the fiscal years ended
September 28, 2008, September 30, 2007 and
October 1, 2006;
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 28, 2008 and
September 30, 2007;
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended
September 28, 2008, September 30, 2007 and
October 1, 2006;
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity for the
fiscal years ended September 28, 2008, September 30,
2007 and October 1, 2006;
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements; and
|
|
|
|
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
2.
|
Financial
Statement Schedules
|
Financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not
required or are not applicable, or the required information is
provided in the consolidated financial statements or notes
described in Item 15(a)(1) above.
The Exhibits listed in the Index to Exhibits, which appears
immediately following the signature page and is incorporated
herein by reference, are filed as part of this
10-K.
81
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
STARBUCKS CORPORATION
Howard Schultz
chairman, president and chief executive officer
November 24, 2008
POWER OF
ATTORNEY
Know all persons by these presents, that each person whose
signature appears below constitutes and appoints Howard Schultz
and Peter J. Bocian, and each of them, as such persons
true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, for such person and in such
persons name, place and stead, in any and all capacities,
to sign any and all amendments to this Report, and to file the
same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and
each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each
and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in
connection therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as
such person might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming that all said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of
them or their or such persons substitute or substitutes,
may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the
capacities indicated as of November 24, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Howard
Schultz
Howard
Schultz
|
|
chairman, president and chief executive officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Peter
J. Bocian
Peter
J. Bocian
|
|
executive vice president, chief financial officer and chief
administrative officer (principal financial officer and
principal accounting officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Barbara
Bass
Barbara
Bass
|
|
director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ William
W. Bradley
William
W. Bradley
|
|
director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Mellody
Hobson
Mellody
Hobson
|
|
director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Olden
Lee
Olden
Lee
|
|
director
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ James
G. Shennan Jr.
James
G. Shennan Jr.
|
|
director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Javier
G. Teruel
Javier
G. Teruel
|
|
director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Myron
E. Ullman III
Myron
E. Ullman III
|
|
director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Craig
E. Weatherup
Craig
E. Weatherup
|
|
director
|
|
|
83
INDEX TO
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
First Filing
|
|
Number
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation of Starbucks Corporation
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-20322
|
|
05/12/06
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Starbucks Corporation
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
11/20/07
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Form of Indenture
|
|
S-3 ASR
|
|
333-145572
|
|
8/20/07
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Form of Note for 6.25% Senior Notes due 2017
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
8/23/07
|
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Form of Supplemental Indenture for 6.25% Senior Notes due
2017
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
8/23/07
|
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
|
|
10
|
.1*
|
|
Starbucks Corporation Amended and Restated Key Employee Stock
Option Plan 1994
|
|
10-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
12/23/03
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
.2*
|
|
Starbucks Corporation Amended and Restated 1989 Stock Option
Plan for Non-Employee Directors
|
|
10-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
12/23/03
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Starbucks Corporation 1991 Company-Wide Stock Option Plan, as
amended and restated through November 20, 2003
|
|
10-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
12/23/03
|
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
|
|
10
|
.3.1
|
|
Starbucks Corporation 1991 Company-Wide Stock Option
Plan Rules of the UK Sub-Plan, as amended and
restated through November 20, 2003
|
|
10-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
12/23/03
|
|
|
10
|
.3.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
.4*
|
|
Starbucks Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan
1995 as amended and restated through October 1,
2006
|
|
10-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
12/14/06
|
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Amended and Restated Lease, dated as of January 1, 2001,
between First and Utah Street Associates, L.P. and Starbucks
Corporation
|
|
10-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
12/20/01
|
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
|
|
10
|
.6*
|
|
Starbucks Corporation Executive Management Bonus Plan, as
amended and restated effective September 19, 2006
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
9/25/06
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
.7*
|
|
Starbucks Corporation Management Deferred Compensation Plan
|
|
S-8
|
|
333-65181
|
|
10/01/98
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
.8*
|
|
Starbucks Corporation 1997 Deferred Stock Plan
|
|
10-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
12/23/99
|
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Starbucks Corporation UK Share Save Plan
|
|
10-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
12/23/03
|
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
|
|
10
|
.10*
|
|
Starbucks Corporation Directors Deferred Compensation Plan, as
amended and restated effective September 29, 2003
|
|
10-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
12/23/03
|
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
|
|
10
|
.11*
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated
December 16, 2005 between Starbucks Corporation and Howard
Behar
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
12/19/05
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Starbucks Corporation UK Share Incentive Plan, as amended and
restated effective November 14, 2006
|
|
10-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
12/14/06
|
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
First Filing
|
|
Number
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
10
|
.13*
|
|
Starbucks Corporation 2005 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan, as
amended and restated effective November 15, 2005
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-20322
|
|
02/10/06
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
.14*
|
|
2005 Key Employee Sub-Plan to the Starbucks Corporation 2005
Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan, as amended and restated
effective November 15, 2005
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-20322
|
|
02/10/06
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
|
|
10
|
.15*
|
|
2005 Non-Employee Director Sub-Plan to the Starbucks Corporation
2005 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
02/10/05
|
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
|
|
10
|
.16*
|
|
Stock Option Grant Agreement for Purchase of Stock under the
2005 Key Employee Sub-Plan to the Starbucks Corporation 2005
Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
02/10/05
|
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
|
|
10
|
.17*
|
|
Stock Option Grant Agreement for Purchase of Stock under the
2005 Non-Employee Director Sub-Plan to the Starbucks Corporation
2005 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
02/10/05
|
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
|
|
10
|
.18*
|
|
Letter Agreement dated as of February 11, 2005 by and among
the Company, the Schultz Irrevocable Trust and the Howard D.
Schultz Irrevocable Trust
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-20322
|
|
02/16/05
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
.19*
|
|
Letter Agreement dated March 30, 2005 between Starbucks
Corporation and James L. Donald
|
|
8-K/A
|
|
0-20322
|
|
04/07/05
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
2005 Company-Wide Sub-Plan to the Starbucks Corporation 2005
Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-20322
|
|
08/10/05
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Stock Option Grant Agreement for Purchase of Stock under the
2005 Company-Wide Sub-Plan to the Starbucks Corporation 2005
Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-20322
|
|
08/10/05
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
Credit Agreement dated August 12, 2005 among Starbucks
Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent,
Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer, Wachovia Bank N.A. and
Citibank, N.A., as Co-Documentation Agents, Banc of America
Securities LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Joint Lead
Arrangers and Joint Book Managers, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as
Syndication Agent, and the other Lenders party thereto.
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
08/15/05
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement between Starbucks Corporation
and Banc of America Securities LLC, dated as of March 27,
2007
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
3/27/07
|
|
|
10
|
.1.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement between Starbucks Corporation
and Goldman, Sachs & Co., dated as of March 27,
2007
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
3/27/07
|
|
|
10
|
.1.2
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
First Filing
|
|
Number
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
10
|
.25*
|
|
Letter Agreement dated April 2, 2007 between Starbucks
Corporation and Peter J. Bocian
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
4/3/07
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
.26*
|
|
Letter Agreement dated July 16, 2007 between Starbucks
Corporation and Martin Coles
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
7/17/07
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
.27*
|
|
Letter Agreement dated July 16, 2007 between Starbucks
Corporation and James C. Alling
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
7/17/07
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
|
|
10
|
.28*
|
|
Letter Agreement dated February 19, 2008 between Starbucks
Corporation and Arthur Rubinfeld
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-20322
|
|
05/08/08
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
.29*
|
|
Letter Agreement dated January 10, 2008 between Starbucks
Corporation and Chet Kuchinad
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-20322
|
|
05/08/08
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
|
|
10
|
.30*
|
|
Letter Agreement dated February 21, 2008 between Starbucks
Corporation and Clifford Burrows
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-20322
|
|
05/08/08
|
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
|
|
10
|
.31*
|
|
Separation Agreement and Release dated January 7, 2008
between Starbucks Corporation and James L. Donald
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-20322
|
|
05/08/08
|
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
|
|
10
|
.32*
|
|
Separation Agreement and Release dated March 3, 2008
between Starbucks Corporation and Launi Skinner
|
|
10-Q
|
|
0-20322
|
|
05/08/08
|
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
|
|
10
|
.33*
|
|
Separation Agreement and Release dated July 29, 2008
between Starbucks Corporation and James C. Alling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
10
|
.34
|
|
Amendment No. 4 to Credit Agreement dated October 31,
2008, among Starbucks Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., as
Administrative Agent and the Lenders party thereto
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
10/31/08
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
.35*
|
|
Time Vested Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (US) under Starbucks
Corporation 2005
Long-Term
Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
11/7/08
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
|
|
10
|
.36*
|
|
Time Vested Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (International)
under Starbucks Corporation 2005 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
11/7/08
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
|
|
10
|
.37*
|
|
Performance Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under
Starbucks Corporation 2005 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
8-K
|
|
0-20322
|
|
11/7/08
|
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
21
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of Starbucks Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
23
|
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
Filed
|
Number
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Form
|
|
File No.
|
|
First Filing
|
|
Number
|
|
Herewith
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
32
|
|
|
Certifications of Principal Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 USC. Section 1350, As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Denotes a compensatory plan, contract or arrangement, in which
the Companys directors or executive officers may
participate. Pike Place is a trademark of the Pike Place Market
PDA, used under license. |
87