National Fuel Gas Company 10-Q
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For
the transition period from
to
Commission File Number 1-3880
NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
New Jersey
|
|
13-1086010 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
6363 Main Street |
|
|
Williamsville, New York
|
|
14221 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(716) 857-7000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer þ Accelerated Filer o Non-Accelerated Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). YES o NO þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date:
Common stock, $1 par value, outstanding at April 30, 2007: 83,475,537 shares.
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Frequently used abbreviations, acronyms, or terms used in this report:
|
|
|
National Fuel Gas Companies |
Company |
|
The Registrant, the Registrant and its subsidiaries or the Registrants
subsidiaries as appropriate in the context of the disclosure |
Data-Track |
|
Data-Track Account Services, Inc. |
Distribution Corporation |
|
National Fuel Gas Distribution Corporation |
Empire |
|
Empire State Pipeline |
ESNE |
|
Energy Systems North East, LLC |
Highland |
|
Highland Forest Resources, Inc. |
Horizon |
|
Horizon Energy Development, Inc. |
Horizon LFG |
|
Horizon LFG, Inc. |
Horizon Power |
|
Horizon Power, Inc. |
Leidy Hub |
|
Leidy Hub, Inc. |
Model City |
|
Model City Energy, LLC |
National Fuel |
|
National Fuel Gas Company |
NFR |
|
National Fuel Resources, Inc. |
Registrant |
|
National Fuel Gas Company |
SECI |
|
Seneca Energy Canada Inc. |
Seneca |
|
Seneca Resources Corporation |
Seneca Energy |
|
Seneca Energy II, LLC |
Supply Corporation |
|
National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation |
|
|
|
Regulatory Agencies |
FASB |
|
Financial Accounting Standards Board |
FERC |
|
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission |
NTSB |
|
National Transportation Safety Board |
NYDEC |
|
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation |
NYPSC |
|
State of New York Public Service Commission |
PaPUC |
|
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission |
SEC |
|
Securities and Exchange Commission |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
2006 Form 10-K |
|
The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
September 30, 2006 |
Bbl |
|
Barrel (of oil) |
Bcf |
|
Billion cubic feet (of natural gas) |
Board foot |
|
A measure of lumber and/or timber equal to 12 inches in length by 12
inches in width by one inch in thickness. |
Btu |
|
British thermal unit; the amount of heat needed to raise the temperature
of one pound of water one degree Fahrenheit. |
Capital expenditure |
|
Represents additions to property, plant, and equipment, or the amount of
money a company spends to buy capital assets or upgrade its existing
capital assets. |
Cashout revenues |
|
A cash resolution of a gas imbalance whereby a customer pays Supply
Corporation for gas the customer receives in excess of amounts
delivered into Supply Corporations system by the customers shipper. |
Degree day |
|
A measure of the coldness of the weather experienced, based on the
extent to which the daily average temperature falls below a reference
temperature, usually 65 degrees Fahrenheit. |
Derivative |
|
A financial instrument or other contract, the terms of which include an
underlying variable (a price, interest rate, index rate, exchange rate, or
other variable) and a notional amount (number of units, barrels, cubic
feet, etc.). The terms also permit for the instrument or contract to be
settled net and no initial net investment is required to enter into the
financial instrument or contract. Examples include futures contracts,
options, no cost collars and swaps. |
Dth |
|
Decatherm; one Dth of natural gas has a heating value of 1,000,000
British thermal units, approximately equal to the heating value of 1 Mcf
of natural gas. |
-2-
|
|
|
GLOSSARY OF TERMS (Cont.) |
|
|
|
Exchange Act |
|
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended |
Expenditures for long-lived assets |
|
Includes capital expenditures, stock acquisitions and/or investments in partnerships. |
FIN |
|
FASB Interpretation Number |
FIN 48 |
|
FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
- an interpretation of SFAS 109 |
Firm transportation and/or storage |
|
The transportation and/or storage service that a supplier of such service
is obligated by contract to provide and for which the customer is
obligated to pay whether or not the service is utilized. |
GAAP |
|
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America |
Goodwill |
|
An intangible asset representing the difference between the fair value of
a company and the price at which a company is purchased. |
Hedging |
|
A method of minimizing the impact of price, interest rate, and/or foreign
currency exchange rate changes, often times through the use of
derivative financial instruments. |
Hub |
|
Location where pipelines intersect enabling the trading, transportation,
storage, exchange, lending and borrowing of natural gas. |
Interruptible transportation and/or storage |
|
The transportation and/or storage service that, in accordance with
contractual arrangements, can be interrupted by the supplier of such
service, and for which the customer does not pay unless utilized. |
LIFO |
|
Last-in, first-out |
Mbbl |
|
Thousand barrels (of oil) |
Mcf |
|
Thousand cubic feet (of natural gas) |
MD&A |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations |
MDth |
|
Thousand decatherms (of natural gas) |
MMcf |
|
Million cubic feet (of natural gas) |
Precedent Agreement |
|
An agreement between a pipeline company and a potential customer to
sign a service agreement after specified events (called
conditions precedent) happen, usually within a specified time. |
Proved developed reserves |
|
Reserves that can be expected to be recovered through existing wells
with existing equipment and operating methods. |
Proved undeveloped reserves |
|
Reserves that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled
acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major
expenditure is
required to make these reserves productive. |
Reserves |
|
The unproduced but recoverable oil and/or gas in place in a formation
which has been proven by production. |
Restructuring |
|
Generally referring to partial deregulation of the utility industry by a
statutory or regulatory process. Restructuring of federally regulated
natural gas pipelines has resulted in the separation (or unbundling) of
gas commodity service from transportation service for wholesale and
large-volume retail markets. State restructuring programs attempt to
extend the same process to retail mass markets. |
SAR |
|
Stock-settled stock appreciation right |
SFAS |
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards |
SFAS 87 |
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 87, Employers
Accounting for Pensions |
SFAS 88 |
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 88, Employers
Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit
Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits |
SFAS 106 |
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 106, Employers
Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions |
SFAS 109 |
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes |
SFAS 115 |
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities |
-3-
|
|
|
GLOSSARY OF TERMS (Concl.) |
|
|
|
SFAS 123R |
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R,
Share-Based Payment |
SFAS 132R |
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 132R, Employers
Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits |
SFAS 157 |
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements |
SFAS 158 |
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans, an amendment of SFAS 87, 88, 106, and 132R |
SFAS 159 |
|
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value
Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an
Amendment of SFAS 115 |
Stock acquisitions |
|
Investments in corporations. |
Unbundled service |
|
A service that has been separated from other services, with rates
charged that reflect only the cost of the separated service. |
WNC |
|
Weather normalization clause; a clause in utility rates which adjusts
customer rates to allow a utility to recover its normal operating costs
calculated at normal temperatures. If temperatures during the
measured period are warmer than normal, customer rates are adjusted
upward in order to recover projected operating costs. If
temperatures
during the measured period are colder than normal, customer
rates
are adjusted downward so that only the projected operating costs
will
be recovered. |
-4-
INDEX
The Company has nothing to report under this item.
Reference to the Company in this report means the Registrant or the Registrant and its
subsidiaries collectively, as appropriate in the context of the disclosure. All references to a
certain year in this report are to the Companys fiscal year ended September 30 of that year,
unless otherwise noted.
This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements should be read with the cautionary
statements and important factors included in this Form 10-Q at Item 2 MD&A, under the heading
Safe Harbor for Forward-Looking Statements. Forward-looking statements are all statements other
than statements of historical fact, including, without limitation, those statements that are
designated with an asterisk (*) following the statement, as well as those statements that are
identified by the use of the words anticipates, estimates, expects, intends, plans,
predicts, projects, and similar expressions.
-5-
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
National Fuel Gas Company
Consolidated Statements of Income and Earnings
Reinvested in the Business
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
(Thousands of Dollars, Except Per Common Share Amounts) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Revenues |
|
$ |
812,156 |
|
|
$ |
890,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased Gas |
|
|
476,904 |
|
|
|
566,540 |
|
Operation and Maintenance |
|
|
125,539 |
|
|
|
121,076 |
|
Property, Franchise and Other Taxes |
|
|
20,233 |
|
|
|
20,120 |
|
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization |
|
|
42,061 |
|
|
|
44,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
664,737 |
|
|
|
752,014 |
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
147,419 |
|
|
|
138,967 |
|
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Unconsolidated Subsidiaries |
|
|
942 |
|
|
|
720 |
|
Interest Income |
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
965 |
|
Other Income |
|
|
2,526 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
Interest Expense on Long-Term Debt |
|
|
(17,888 |
) |
|
|
(18,149 |
) |
Other Interest Expense |
|
|
(1,516 |
) |
|
|
(1,465 |
) |
|
Income Before Income Taxes |
|
|
132,368 |
|
|
|
121,286 |
|
Income Tax Expense |
|
|
53,921 |
|
|
|
42,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Available for Common Stock |
|
|
78,447 |
|
|
|
78,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS REINVESTED IN THE BUSINESS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31 |
|
|
781,728 |
|
|
|
845,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
860,175 |
|
|
|
924,545 |
|
Share Repurchases |
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
22,619 |
|
Dividends on Common Stock
(2007 - $0.30; 2006 - $0.29) |
|
|
24,940 |
|
|
|
24,327 |
|
|
Balance at March 31 |
|
$ |
834,902 |
|
|
$ |
877,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Common Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Available for Common Stock |
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
$ |
0.93 |
|
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Available for Common Stock |
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
|
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used in Basic Calculation |
|
|
82,895,087 |
|
|
|
84,346,733 |
|
|
Used in Diluted Calculation |
|
|
85,033,127 |
|
|
|
86,253,597 |
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
-6-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
National Fuel Gas Company
Consolidated Statements of Income and Earnings
Reinvested in the Business
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
(Thousands of Dollars, Except Per Common Share Amounts) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Revenues |
|
$ |
1,316,396 |
|
|
$ |
1,601,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased Gas |
|
|
719,843 |
|
|
|
1,003,317 |
|
Operation and Maintenance |
|
|
224,913 |
|
|
|
224,704 |
|
Property, Franchise and Other Taxes |
|
|
37,345 |
|
|
|
37,302 |
|
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization |
|
|
84,886 |
|
|
|
87,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,066,987 |
|
|
|
1,352,647 |
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
249,409 |
|
|
|
249,090 |
|
Other Income (Expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Unconsolidated Subsidiaries |
|
|
2,173 |
|
|
|
1,985 |
|
Interest Income |
|
|
2,248 |
|
|
|
2,098 |
|
Other Income |
|
|
3,241 |
|
|
|
989 |
|
Interest Expense on Long-Term Debt |
|
|
(33,931 |
) |
|
|
(36,367 |
) |
Other Interest Expense |
|
|
(3,366 |
) |
|
|
(3,240 |
) |
|
Income Before Income Taxes |
|
|
219,774 |
|
|
|
214,555 |
|
Income Tax Expense |
|
|
86,807 |
|
|
|
78,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Available for Common Stock |
|
|
132,967 |
|
|
|
136,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS REINVESTED IN THE BUSINESS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at October 1 |
|
|
786,013 |
|
|
|
813,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
918,980 |
|
|
|
949,033 |
|
Share Repurchases |
|
|
34,351 |
|
|
|
22,619 |
|
Dividends on Common Stock
(2007 - $0.60; 2006 - $0.58) |
|
|
49,727 |
|
|
|
48,815 |
|
|
Balance at March 31 |
|
$ |
834,902 |
|
|
$ |
877,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Common Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Available for Common Stock |
|
$ |
1.61 |
|
|
$ |
1.61 |
|
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Available for Common Stock |
|
$ |
1.57 |
|
|
$ |
1.58 |
|
|
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Used in Basic Calculation |
|
|
82,786,027 |
|
|
|
84,385,140 |
|
|
Used in Diluted Calculation |
|
|
84,891,742 |
|
|
|
86,256,515 |
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
-7-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
National Fuel Gas Company
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
(Thousands of Dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment |
|
$ |
4,820,700 |
|
|
$ |
4,703,040 |
|
Less Accumulated Depreciation, Depletion
and Amortization |
|
|
1,893,449 |
|
|
|
1,825,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,927,251 |
|
|
|
2,877,726 |
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Temporary Cash Investments |
|
|
121,809 |
|
|
|
69,611 |
|
Hedging Collateral Deposits |
|
|
2,034 |
|
|
|
19,676 |
|
Receivables
Net of Allowance for Uncollectible
Accounts of
$44,471 and $31,427, Respectively |
|
|
335,666 |
|
|
|
144,254 |
|
Unbilled Utility Revenue |
|
|
58,850 |
|
|
|
25,538 |
|
Gas Stored Underground |
|
|
17,021 |
|
|
|
59,461 |
|
Materials and Supplies at average cost |
|
|
31,853 |
|
|
|
36,693 |
|
Unrecovered Purchased Gas Costs |
|
|
13,962 |
|
|
|
12,970 |
|
Prepaid Pension and Post-Retirement Benefit Costs |
|
|
68,483 |
|
|
|
64,125 |
|
Other Current Assets |
|
|
30,700 |
|
|
|
63,723 |
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
23,951 |
|
|
|
23,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
704,329 |
|
|
|
519,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoverable Future Taxes |
|
|
79,177 |
|
|
|
79,511 |
|
Unamortized Debt Expense |
|
|
14,482 |
|
|
|
15,492 |
|
Other Regulatory Assets |
|
|
85,427 |
|
|
|
76,917 |
|
Deferred Charges |
|
|
5,234 |
|
|
|
3,558 |
|
Other Investments |
|
|
80,866 |
|
|
|
88,414 |
|
Investments in Unconsolidated Subsidiaries |
|
|
15,850 |
|
|
|
11,590 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
5,476 |
|
|
|
5,476 |
|
Intangible Assets |
|
|
30,423 |
|
|
|
31,498 |
|
Fair Value of Derivative Financial Instruments |
|
|
1,866 |
|
|
|
11,305 |
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
4,627 |
|
|
|
9,003 |
|
Other |
|
|
6,010 |
|
|
|
4,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
329,438 |
|
|
|
337,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
3,961,018 |
|
|
$ |
3,734,331 |
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
-8-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
National Fuel Gas Company
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
(Thousands of Dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $1 Par Value
Authorized 200,000,000 Shares; Issued
And Outstanding 83,132,149 Shares and
83,402,670 Shares, Respectively |
|
$ |
83,132 |
|
|
$ |
83,403 |
|
Paid in Capital |
|
|
565,809 |
|
|
|
543,730 |
|
Earnings Reinvested in the Business |
|
|
834,902 |
|
|
|
786,013 |
|
|
Total Common Shareholder Equity Before
Items of Other Comprehensive Income |
|
|
1,483,843 |
|
|
|
1,413,146 |
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
|
|
21,733 |
|
|
|
30,416 |
|
|
Total Comprehensive Shareholders Equity |
|
|
1,505,576 |
|
|
|
1,443,562 |
|
Long-Term Debt, Net of Current Portion |
|
|
999,000 |
|
|
|
1,095,675 |
|
|
Total Capitalization |
|
|
2,504,576 |
|
|
|
2,539,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current and Accrued Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes Payable to Banks and Commercial Paper |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Portion of Long-Term Debt |
|
|
96,393 |
|
|
|
22,925 |
|
Accounts Payable |
|
|
166,990 |
|
|
|
133,034 |
|
Amounts Payable to Customers |
|
|
10,596 |
|
|
|
23,935 |
|
Dividends Payable |
|
|
24,927 |
|
|
|
25,008 |
|
Interest Payable on Long-Term Debt |
|
|
18,419 |
|
|
|
18,420 |
|
Other Accruals and Current Liabilities |
|
|
176,307 |
|
|
|
27,040 |
|
Fair Value of Derivative Financial Instruments |
|
|
32,122 |
|
|
|
39,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
525,754 |
|
|
|
290,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Credits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
556,115 |
|
|
|
544,502 |
|
Taxes Refundable to Customers |
|
|
10,433 |
|
|
|
10,426 |
|
Unamortized Investment Tax Credit |
|
|
5,743 |
|
|
|
6,094 |
|
Cost of Removal Regulatory Liability |
|
|
87,986 |
|
|
|
85,076 |
|
Other Regulatory Liabilities |
|
|
70,842 |
|
|
|
75,456 |
|
Post-Retirement Liabilities |
|
|
26,953 |
|
|
|
32,918 |
|
Asset Retirement Obligations |
|
|
79,609 |
|
|
|
77,392 |
|
Other Deferred Credits |
|
|
93,007 |
|
|
|
72,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
930,688 |
|
|
|
904,749 |
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capitalization and Liabilities |
|
$ |
3,961,018 |
|
|
$ |
3,734,331 |
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
-9-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
National Fuel Gas Company
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
(Thousands of Dollars) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income Available for Common Stock |
|
$ |
132,967 |
|
|
$ |
136,013 |
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash
Provided by Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization |
|
|
84,886 |
|
|
|
87,324 |
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
21,803 |
|
|
|
(1,435 |
) |
(Income) Loss from Unconsolidated Subsidiaries, Net of
Cash Distributions |
|
|
(960 |
) |
|
|
1,166 |
|
Excess Tax Benefits Associated with Stock-Based
Compensation Awards |
|
|
(13,689 |
) |
|
|
(6,515 |
) |
Other |
|
|
3,818 |
|
|
|
(5,297 |
) |
Change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedging Collateral Deposits |
|
|
17,642 |
|
|
|
60,894 |
|
Receivables and Unbilled Utility Revenue |
|
|
(225,511 |
) |
|
|
(249,466 |
) |
Gas Stored Underground and Materials and Supplies |
|
|
47,243 |
|
|
|
33,486 |
|
Unrecovered Purchased Gas Costs |
|
|
(992 |
) |
|
|
14,817 |
|
Prepayments and Other Current Assets |
|
|
28,659 |
|
|
|
24,372 |
|
Accounts Payable |
|
|
34,417 |
|
|
|
(9,951 |
) |
Amounts Payable to Customers |
|
|
(13,339 |
) |
|
|
11,492 |
|
Other Accruals and Current Liabilities |
|
|
163,928 |
|
|
|
139,020 |
|
Other Assets |
|
|
(3,765 |
) |
|
|
(11,837 |
) |
Other Liabilities |
|
|
(2,434 |
) |
|
|
19,107 |
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
|
|
274,673 |
|
|
|
243,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures |
|
|
(132,313 |
) |
|
|
(134,961 |
) |
Investment in Partnership |
|
|
(3,300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net Proceeds from Sale of Oil and Gas Producing Properties |
|
|
2,330 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Other |
|
|
(339 |
) |
|
|
(1,396 |
) |
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities |
|
|
(133,622 |
) |
|
|
(136,353 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess Tax Benefits Associated with Stock-Based
Compensation Awards |
|
|
13,689 |
|
|
|
6,515 |
|
Shares Repurchased under Repurchase Plan |
|
|
(43,344 |
) |
|
|
(26,577 |
) |
Reduction of Long-Term Debt |
|
|
(23,207 |
) |
|
|
(4,529 |
) |
Dividends Paid on Common Stock |
|
|
(49,808 |
) |
|
|
(48,933 |
) |
Net Proceeds from Issuance of Common Stock |
|
|
14,604 |
|
|
|
7,164 |
|
|
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities |
|
|
(88,066 |
) |
|
|
(66,360 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Exchange Rates on Cash |
|
|
(787 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Cash and Temporary Cash Investments |
|
|
52,198 |
|
|
|
40,492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Temporary Cash Investments at October 1 |
|
|
69,611 |
|
|
|
57,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Temporary Cash Investments at March 31 |
|
$ |
121,809 |
|
|
$ |
98,099 |
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
-10-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
National Fuel Gas Company
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
(Thousands of Dollars) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Net Income Available for Common Stock |
|
$ |
78,447 |
|
|
$ |
78,594 |
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Before Tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment |
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
|
(991 |
) |
Minimum Pension Liability Adjustment |
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Gain on Securities Available for Sale Arising
During the Period |
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
1,121 |
|
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Financial Instruments
Arising During the Period |
|
|
(20,456 |
) |
|
|
21,618 |
|
Reclassification Adjustment for Realized (Gains) Losses on
Derivative Financial Instruments in Net Income |
|
|
(958 |
) |
|
|
25,794 |
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Before Tax |
|
|
(20,028 |
) |
|
|
47,542 |
|
|
Income Tax Benefit Related to Minimum Pension
Liability Adjustment |
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income Tax Expense Related to Unrealized Gain
on Securities Available for Sale Arising During the Period |
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) Related to Unrealized Gain (Loss)
on Derivative Financial Instruments Arising During the Period |
|
|
(8,494 |
) |
|
|
8,334 |
|
Reclassification Adjustment for Income Tax (Expense) Benefit on
Realized (Gains) Losses from Derivative Financial Instruments
In Net Income |
|
|
(364 |
) |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
Income Taxes
Net |
|
|
(8,770 |
) |
|
|
18,726 |
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
|
(11,258 |
) |
|
|
28,816 |
|
|
Comprehensive Income |
|
$ |
67,189 |
|
|
$ |
107,410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
(Thousands of Dollars) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Net Income Available for Common Stock |
|
$ |
132,967 |
|
|
$ |
136,013 |
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Before Tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment |
|
|
(3,645 |
) |
|
|
(736 |
) |
Minimum Pension Liability Adjustment |
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Gain on Securities Available for Sale Arising
During the Period |
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
2,263 |
|
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivative Financial Instruments
Arising During the Period |
|
|
(10,955 |
) |
|
|
62,615 |
|
Reclassification Adjustment for Realized Losses on
Derivative Financial Instruments in Net Income |
|
|
2,218 |
|
|
|
63,725 |
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Before Tax |
|
|
(11,428 |
) |
|
|
127,867 |
|
|
Income Tax Benefit Related to Minimum Pension
Liability Adjustment |
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income Tax Expense Related to Unrealized Gain
on Securities Available for Sale Arising During the Period |
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
791 |
|
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) Related to Unrealized Gain (Loss)
on Derivative Financial Instruments Arising During the Period |
|
|
(4,764 |
) |
|
|
24,110 |
|
Reclassification Adjustment for Income Tax Benefit on
Realized Losses from Derivative Financial Instruments
In Net Income |
|
|
1,656 |
|
|
|
24,586 |
|
|
Income Taxes
Net |
|
|
(2,745 |
) |
|
|
49,487 |
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
|
|
(8,683 |
) |
|
|
78,380 |
|
|
Comprehensive Income |
|
$ |
124,284 |
|
|
$ |
214,393 |
|
|
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
-11-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
National Fuel Gas Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation. The Company consolidates its majority owned entities. The equity
method is used to account for minority owned entities. All significant intercompany balances and
transactions are eliminated.
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
Earnings for Interim Periods. The Company, in its opinion, has included all adjustments that are
necessary for a fair statement of the results of operations for the reported periods. The
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, included herein, should be read in conjunction
with the financial statements and notes for the years ended September 30, 2006, 2005 and 2004 that
are included in the Companys 2006 Form 10-K. The consolidated financial statements for the year
ended September 30, 2007 will be audited by the Companys independent registered public accounting
firm after the end of the fiscal year.
The earnings for the six months ended March 31, 2007 should not be taken as a prediction of
earnings for the entire fiscal year ending September 30, 2007. Most of the business of the Utility
and Energy Marketing segments is seasonal in nature and is influenced by weather conditions. Due
to the seasonal nature of the heating business in the Utility and Energy Marketing segments,
earnings during the winter months normally represent a substantial part of the earnings that those
segments are expected to achieve for the entire fiscal year. The Companys business segments are
discussed more fully in Note 5 Business Segment Information.
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. For purposes of the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows,
the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of generally
three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Hedging Collateral Deposits. Cash held in margin accounts serve as collateral for open positions
on exchange-traded futures contracts, exchange-traded options and over-the-counter swaps and
collars.
Gas Stored Underground Current. In the Utility segment, gas stored underground current is
carried at lower of cost or market, on a LIFO method. Gas stored underground current normally
declines during the first and second quarters of the year and is replenished during the third and
fourth quarters. In the Utility segment, the current cost of replacing gas withdrawn from storage
is recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Income and a reserve for gas replacement is recorded
in the Consolidated Balance Sheets under the caption Other Accruals and Current Liabilities.
Such reserve, which amounted to $141.8 million at March 31, 2007, is reduced to zero by September
30 of each year as the inventory is replenished.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income,
net of related tax effect, are as follows (in thousands):
-12-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2007 |
|
|
At September 30, 2006 |
|
Minimum Pension Liability Adjustment |
|
$ |
(199 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Cumulative Foreign Currency
Translation Adjustment |
|
|
31,056 |
|
|
|
34,701 |
|
Net Unrealized Loss on Derivative
Financial Instruments |
|
|
(17,139 |
) |
|
|
(11,510 |
) |
Net Unrealized Gain on Securities
Available for Sale |
|
|
8,015 |
|
|
|
7,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income |
|
$ |
21,733 |
|
|
$ |
30,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Common Share. Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing income
available for common stock by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the
period. Diluted earnings per common share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if
securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.
For purposes of determining earnings per common share, the only potentially dilutive securities the
Company has outstanding are stock options and stock-settled SARs. The diluted weighted average
shares outstanding shown on the Consolidated Statements of Income reflects the potential dilution
as a result of these stock options and stock-settled SARs as determined using the Treasury Stock
Method. Stock options and stock-settled SARs that are antidilutive are excluded from the
calculation of diluted earnings per common share. For the quarter and six months ended March 31,
2007, 11,879 and 283,288 stock options, respectively, were excluded as being antidilutive. In
addition, there were 11,111 and 5,494 stock-settled SARs excluded as being antidilutive for the
quarter and six months ended March 31, 2007, respectively. For the quarter and six months ended
March 31, 2006, there were no stock options or stock-settled SARs excluded as being antidilutive.
Share Repurchases. The Company considers all shares repurchased as cancelled shares restored to
the status of authorized but unissued shares, in accordance with New Jersey law. The repurchases
are accounted for on the date the share repurchase is settled as an adjustment to common stock (at
par value) with the excess repurchase price allocated between paid in capital and retained
earnings. Refer to Note 3 Capitalization for further discussion of the share repurchase program.
Stock-Based Compensation. For the quarter and six months ended March 31, 2007, the Company granted
50,000 stock-settled SARs having a weighted average exercise price of $41.20 per share. The
weighted average grant date fair value of these stock-settled SARs was $7.81 per share for the
quarter and six months ended March 31, 2007. The accounting treatment for such stock-settled SARs
is the same under SFAS 123R as the accounting for stock options under SFAS 123R. There were no
stock options granted during the quarter ended March 31, 2007. During the six months ended March
31, 2007, the Company granted 448,000 stock options having a weighted average exercise price of
$39.48 per share. The weighted average grant date fair value of such options was $7.27 per share
for the six months ended March 31, 2007. The Company also granted 10,000 and 25,000 restricted
share awards (non-vested stock as defined in SFAS 123R), during the quarter and six months ended
March 31, 2007, respectively. The weighted average fair values of such restricted shares were
$41.20 and $40.18 per share, respectively, for the quarter and six months ended March 31, 2007.
New Accounting Pronouncements. In July 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a minimum
probability threshold that a tax position must meet before a financial statement benefit is
recognized. The minimum threshold is defined in FIN 48 as a tax position that is more likely than
not to be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority, including resolution of
any related appeals or litigation
processes, based on the technical merits of the position. The cumulative effect of
applying FIN 48 at
-13-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
adoption, if any, is to be reported as an adjustment to opening retained earnings for the year of
adoption. FIN 48 is effective for the first quarter of the Companys 2008 fiscal year. The
Company is currently assessing the potential effect of FIN 48 on its consolidated financial
statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS 157 provides
guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. The pronouncement serves to
clarify the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value, the information
used to measure fair value, and the effect that fair-value measurements have on earnings. SFAS 157
is to be applied whenever another standard requires or allows assets or liabilities to be measured
at fair value. The pronouncement is effective as of the Companys first quarter of fiscal 2009. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS 157 will have on its
consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB also issued SFAS 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans (an amendment of SFAS 87, SFAS 88, SFAS 106, and SFAS
132R). SFAS 158 requires that companies recognize a net liability or asset to report the
underfunded or overfunded status of their defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit
plans on their balance sheets, as well as recognize changes in the funded status of a defined
benefit post-retirement plan in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income.
The pronouncement also specifies that a plans assets and obligations that determine its funded
status be measured as of the end of the Companys fiscal year, with limited exceptions. The Company
is required to recognize the funded status of its benefit plans and the disclosure requirements of
SFAS 158 by the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007. The requirement to measure the plan assets and
benefit obligations as of the Companys fiscal year-end date will be adopted by the Company by the
end of fiscal 2009. If the Company recognized the funded status of its pension and post-retirement
benefit plans at September 30, 2006, the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet would reflect a
liability of $232.5 million instead of the prepaid pension and post-retirement costs of $64.1
million and post-retirement liabilities of $32.9 million that were presented on the balance sheet
at September 30, 2006. The Company expects that it will record a regulatory asset for the majority
of this liability with the remainder reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income. The
Company will recalculate the funded status of its pension and post-retirement benefit plans during
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of SFAS 115. SFAS 159 permits entities to choose
to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not otherwise
required to be measured at fair value under GAAP. A company that elects the fair value option for
an eligible item will be required to recognize in current earnings any changes in that items fair
value in reporting periods subsequent to the date of adoption. SFAS 159 is effective as of the
Companys first quarter of fiscal 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any,
that the adoption of SFAS 159 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
Note 2 Income Taxes
The components of federal, state and foreign income taxes included in the Consolidated
Statements of Income are as follows (in thousands):
-14-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Income Taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
49,937 |
|
|
$ |
62,466 |
|
State |
|
|
14,823 |
|
|
|
15,181 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
2,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
14,181 |
|
|
|
(1,433 |
) |
State |
|
|
3,546 |
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
Foreign |
|
|
4,076 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,807 |
|
|
|
78,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Investment Tax Credit |
|
|
(348 |
) |
|
|
(348 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Income Taxes |
|
$ |
86,459 |
|
|
$ |
78,194 |
|
|
|
|
The U.S. and foreign components of income before income taxes are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
$ |
208,512 |
|
|
$ |
195,503 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
10,914 |
|
|
|
18,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
219,426 |
|
|
$ |
214,207 |
|
|
|
|
Total income taxes as reported differ from the amounts that were computed by applying the
federal income tax rate to income before income taxes. The following is a reconciliation of this
difference (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Income Tax
Expense, Computed at Statutory Rate of 35% |
|
$ |
76,799 |
|
|
$ |
74,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Reduction) in Taxes Resulting From: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State Income Taxes |
|
|
11,940 |
|
|
|
9,723 |
|
Foreign Tax Differential |
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
(4,704 |
)(1) |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
(2,708 |
) |
|
|
(1,797 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Income Taxes |
|
$ |
86,459 |
|
|
$ |
78,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes a $5.1 million deferred tax benefit relating to additional future tax
deductions forecasted in the Exploration and Production segments Canadian division. |
Significant components of the Companys deferred tax liabilities and assets were as
follows (in thousands):
-15-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2007 |
|
At September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment |
|
$ |
593,523 |
|
|
$ |
569,677 |
|
Other |
|
|
35,876 |
|
|
|
37,865 |
|
|
|
|
Total Deferred Tax Liabilities |
|
|
629,399 |
|
|
|
607,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Loss Carryover |
|
|
(5,976 |
) |
|
|
(8,786 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(95,886 |
) |
|
|
(86,659 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Deferred Tax Assets |
|
|
(101,862 |
) |
|
|
(95,445 |
) |
|
|
|
Total Net Deferred Income Taxes |
|
$ |
527,537 |
|
|
$ |
512,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presented as Follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Deferred Tax Asset Current |
|
$ |
(23,951 |
) |
|
$ |
(23,402 |
) |
Net Deferred Tax Asset Non-Current |
|
|
(4,627 |
) |
|
|
(9,003 |
) |
Net Deferred Tax Liability Non-Current |
|
|
556,115 |
|
|
|
544,502 |
|
|
|
|
Total Net Deferred Income Taxes |
|
$ |
527,537 |
|
|
$ |
512,097 |
|
|
|
|
Regulatory liabilities representing the reduction of previously recorded deferred income taxes
with rate-regulated activities that are expected to be refundable to customers amounted to $10.4
million at both March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006. Also, regulatory assets representing future
amounts collectible from customers, corresponding to additional deferred income taxes not
previously recorded because of prior ratemaking practices, amounted to $79.2 million and $79.5
million at March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006, respectively.
A capital loss carryover of $17.1 million existed at March 31, 2007, which expires if not
utilized by September 30, 2008. Although realization is not assured, management determined that it
is more likely than not that the entire deferred tax asset associated with this carryover will be
realized during the carryover period, and as such, no valuation allowance has been provided at
March 31, 2007.
A deferred tax asset of $4.6 million and $9.0 million relating to Canadian operations existed
at March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006, respectively. Although realization is not assured,
management determined that it is more likely than not that future taxable income will be generated
in Canada to fully utilize this asset, and as such, no valuation allowance has been provided.
Note 3 Capitalization
Common Stock. During the six months ended March 31, 2007, the Company issued 1,264,117 original
issue shares of common stock as a result of stock option exercises and 25,000 original issue shares
for restricted stock awards (non-vested stock as defined in SFAS 123R). The Company also issued
4,346 original issue shares of common stock to the non-employee directors of the Company as partial
consideration for the directors services during the six months ended March 31, 2007. Holders of
stock options or restricted stock will often tender shares of common stock to the Company for
payment of option exercise prices and/or applicable withholding taxes. During the six months ended
March 31, 2007, 368,656 shares of common stock were tendered to the Company for such purposes. The
Company considers all shares tendered as cancelled shares restored to the status of authorized but
unissued shares, in accordance with New Jersey law.
On December 8, 2005, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the Company to implement a
share repurchase program, whereby the Company may repurchase outstanding shares of common stock, up
to an aggregate amount of 8 million shares in the open market or through privately negotiated
transactions. During the six months ended March 31, 2007, the Company repurchased 1,195,328
shares
-16-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
for $43.3 million under this program, funded with cash provided by operating activities and/or
through the use of the Companys bi-lateral lines of credit. Since the share repurchase program
was implemented, the Company has repurchased 3,721,878 shares for $128.5 million.
Long-Term Debt. On December 8, 2006, the Company repaid $22.8 million of Empires secured debt.
Such amount was classified as Current Portion of Long-Term Debt on the Companys Consolidated
Balance Sheet at September 30, 2006.
Note 4 Commitments and Contingencies
Environmental Matters. The Company is subject to various federal, state and local laws and
regulations relating to the protection of the environment. The Company has established procedures
for the ongoing evaluation of its operations to identify potential environmental exposures and
comply with regulatory policies and procedures. It is the Companys policy to accrue estimated
environmental clean-up costs (investigation and remediation) when such amounts can reasonably be
estimated and it is probable that the Company will be required to incur such costs.
As disclosed in Note H of the Companys 2006 Form 10-K, the Company received, in 1998 and
again in October 1999, notice that the NYDEC believes the Company is responsible for contamination
discovered at a former manufactured gas plant site in New York for which the Company had not been
named as a potentially responsible party. In February 2007, the NYDEC identified the Company as a
potentially responsible party for the site and issued a proposed remedial action plan. The NYDEC
estimated clean-up costs under its proposed remedy to be $8.9 million if implemented. Although the
Company commented to the NYDEC that the proposed remedial action plan contained a number of
material errors, omissions and procedural defects, the NYDEC, in a March 2007 Record of Decision,
selected the remedy it had previously proposed. The Company has not incurred any clean-up costs at
this site. The Company expects to enter negotiations with the NYDEC regarding this site and
anticipates that negotiations will extend into 2008.
At March 31, 2007, the Company has estimated its remaining clean-up costs related to former
manufactured gas plant sites and third party waste disposal sites will be in the range of $12.5
million to $16.1 million. The minimum estimated liability of $12.5 million has been recorded on
the Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2007. The Company expects to recover its environmental
clean-up costs from a combination of rate recovery and insurance proceeds.
The Company is currently not aware of any material additional exposure to environmental
liabilities. However, changes in environmental regulations or other factors could adversely impact
the Company.
Other. The Company is involved in other litigation and regulatory matters arising in the normal
course of business. These other matters may include, for example, negligence claims and tax,
regulatory or other governmental audits, inspections, investigations and other proceedings. These
matters may involve state and federal taxes, safety, compliance with regulations, rate base, cost
of service and purchased gas cost issues, among other things. While these normal-course matters
could have a material effect on earnings and cash flows in the quarterly and annual period in which
they are resolved, they are not expected to change materially the Companys present liquidity
position, nor to have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company.
-17-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
Note 5 Business Segment Information.
The Company has five reportable segments: Utility, Pipeline and Storage, Exploration and
Production, Energy Marketing, and Timber. The division of the Companys operations into the
reportable segments is based upon a combination of factors including differences in products and
services, regulatory environment and geographic factors.
The data presented in the tables below reflect the reportable segments and reconciliations to
consolidated amounts. As stated in the 2006 Form 10-K, the Company evaluates segment performance
based on income before discontinued operations, extraordinary items and cumulative effects of
changes in accounting (where applicable). When these items are not applicable, the Company
evaluates performance based on net income. There have been no changes in the basis of segmentation
nor in the basis of measuring segment profit or loss from those used in the Companys 2006 Form
10-K. There have been no material changes in the amount of assets for any operating segment from
the amounts disclosed in the 2006 Form 10-K.
-18-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
Quarter Ended March 31, 2007 (Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipeline |
|
Exploration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
and |
|
Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable |
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment |
|
Total |
|
|
Utility |
|
Storage |
|
Production |
|
Marketing |
|
Timber |
|
Segments |
|
All Other |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue from External Customers |
|
$ |
501,473 |
|
|
$ |
34,952 |
|
|
$ |
92,610 |
|
|
$ |
163,338 |
|
|
$ |
18,184 |
|
|
$ |
810,557 |
|
|
$ |
1,403 |
|
|
$ |
196 |
|
|
$ |
812,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment Revenues |
|
$ |
5,941 |
|
|
$ |
20,884 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
26,825 |
|
|
$ |
2,090 |
|
|
$ |
(28,915 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
33,444 |
|
|
$ |
13,936 |
|
|
$ |
19,801 |
|
|
$ |
6,706 |
|
|
$ |
3,200 |
|
|
$ |
77,087 |
|
|
$ |
467 |
|
|
$ |
893 |
|
|
$ |
78,447 |
|
Six Months Ended March 31, 2007 (Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipeline |
|
Exploration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
and |
|
Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable |
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment |
|
Total |
|
|
Utility |
|
Storage |
|
Production |
|
Marketing |
|
Timber |
|
Segments |
|
All Other |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue from
External Customers |
|
$ |
790,256 |
|
|
$ |
64,761 |
|
|
$ |
181,318 |
|
|
$ |
246,656 |
|
|
$ |
29,947 |
|
|
$ |
1,312,938 |
|
|
$ |
3,079 |
|
|
$ |
379 |
|
|
$ |
1,316,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment Revenues |
|
$ |
9,970 |
|
|
$ |
41,252 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
51,222 |
|
|
$ |
4,287 |
|
|
$ |
(55,509 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
50,618 |
|
|
$ |
27,624 |
|
|
$ |
40,523 |
|
|
$ |
7,198 |
|
|
$ |
3,417 |
|
|
$ |
129,380 |
|
|
$ |
1,453 |
|
|
$ |
2,134 |
|
|
$ |
132,967 |
|
Quarter Ended March 31, 2006 (Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipeline |
|
Exploration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
and |
|
Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable |
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment |
|
Total |
|
|
Utility |
|
Storage |
|
Production |
|
Marketing |
|
Timber |
|
Segments |
|
All Other |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue from
External Customers |
|
$ |
536,235 |
|
|
$ |
39,346 |
|
|
$ |
88,719 |
|
|
$ |
206,061 |
|
|
$ |
19,157 |
|
|
$ |
889,518 |
|
|
$ |
1,075 |
|
|
$ |
388 |
|
|
$ |
890,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment Revenues |
|
$ |
5,681 |
|
|
$ |
19,711 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(23 |
) |
|
$ |
25,369 |
|
|
$ |
2,057 |
|
|
$ |
(27,426 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
28,654 |
|
|
$ |
16,892 |
|
|
$ |
25,845 |
|
|
$ |
3,877 |
|
|
$ |
2,242 |
|
|
$ |
77,510 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
1,038 |
|
|
$ |
78,594 |
|
Six Months Ended March 31, 2006 (Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipeline |
|
Exploration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
and |
|
Energy |
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable |
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment |
|
Total |
|
|
Utility |
|
Storage |
|
Production |
|
Marketing |
|
Timber |
|
Segments |
|
All Other |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenue from
External Customers |
|
$ |
967,714 |
|
|
$ |
74,085 |
|
|
$ |
170,806 |
|
|
$ |
351,620 |
|
|
$ |
36,066 |
|
|
$ |
1,600,291 |
|
|
$ |
1,058 |
|
|
$ |
388 |
|
|
$ |
1,601,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment Revenues |
|
$ |
9,803 |
|
|
$ |
41,006 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
50,809 |
|
|
$ |
6,584 |
|
|
$ |
(57,393 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
50,407 |
|
|
$ |
32,742 |
|
|
$ |
43,280 |
|
|
$ |
4,864 |
|
|
$ |
3,706 |
|
|
$ |
134,999 |
|
|
$ |
616 |
|
|
$ |
398 |
|
|
$ |
136,013 |
|
-19-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Cont.)
Note 6 Intangible Assets
The components of the Companys intangible assets were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, |
|
|
|
At March 31, 2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible Assets Subject to Amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Transportation Contracts |
|
$ |
8,580 |
|
|
$ |
(4,454 |
) |
|
$ |
4,126 |
|
|
$ |
4,660 |
|
Long-Term Gas Purchase Contracts |
|
|
31,864 |
|
|
|
(5,823 |
) |
|
|
26,041 |
|
|
|
26,838 |
|
Intangible Assets Not Subject to
Amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Qualified Benefit Plan Intangible
Asset |
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
40,700 |
|
|
$ |
(10,277 |
) |
|
$ |
30,423 |
|
|
$ |
31,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Amortization Expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
1,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended March 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
1,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The gross carrying amount of intangible assets subject to amortization at March 31, 2007
remained unchanged from September 30, 2006. The only activity with regard to intangible assets
subject to amortization was amortization expense as shown in the table above. Amortization expense
for the long-term transportation contracts is estimated to be $0.5 million for the remainder of
2007 and $1.1 million and $0.5 million for 2008 and 2009, respectively. Amortization expense for
transportation contracts is estimated to be $0.4 million annually for 2010 and 2011. Amortization
expense for the long-term gas purchase contracts is estimated to be $0.8 million for the remainder
of 2007 and $1.6 million annually for 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011.
Note 7 Retirement Plan and Other Post-Retirement Benefits
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost (in thousands):
Three months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plan |
|
Other Post-Retirement Benefits |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Service Cost |
|
$ |
3,225 |
|
|
$ |
4,104 |
|
|
$ |
1,403 |
|
|
$ |
2,007 |
|
Interest Cost |
|
|
11,088 |
|
|
|
10,049 |
|
|
|
6,800 |
|
|
|
6,701 |
|
Expected Return on Plan Assets |
|
|
(12,809 |
) |
|
|
(12,486 |
) |
|
|
(6,740 |
) |
|
|
(5,576 |
) |
Amortization of Prior Service Cost |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Amortization of Transition Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,782 |
|
|
|
1,782 |
|
Amortization of Losses |
|
|
3,382 |
|
|
|
5,777 |
|
|
|
2,053 |
|
|
|
5,850 |
|
Net Amortization and Deferral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Regulatory Purposes (Including
Volumetric Adjustments) (1) |
|
|
4,074 |
|
|
|
1,907 |
|
|
|
10,732 |
|
|
|
2,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Periodic Benefit Cost |
|
$ |
9,180 |
|
|
$ |
9,590 |
|
|
$ |
16,031 |
|
|
$ |
13,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-20-
Item 1. Financial Statements (Concl.)
Six months ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement Plan |
|
Other Post-Retirement Benefits |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Service Cost |
|
$ |
6,450 |
|
|
$ |
8,208 |
|
|
$ |
2,807 |
|
|
$ |
4,015 |
|
Interest Cost |
|
|
22,175 |
|
|
|
20,098 |
|
|
|
13,599 |
|
|
|
13,402 |
|
Expected Return on Plan Assets |
|
|
(25,618 |
) |
|
|
(24,972 |
) |
|
|
(13,480 |
) |
|
|
(11,151 |
) |
Amortization of Prior Service Cost |
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Amortization of Transition Amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,563 |
|
|
|
3,564 |
|
Amortization of Losses |
|
|
6,764 |
|
|
|
11,554 |
|
|
|
4,107 |
|
|
|
11,701 |
|
Net Amortization and Deferral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Regulatory Purposes (Including
Volumetric Adjustments) (1) |
|
|
4,229 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
13,071 |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Periodic Benefit Cost |
|
$ |
14,441 |
|
|
$ |
15,745 |
|
|
$ |
23,669 |
|
|
$ |
21,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Companys policy is to record retirement plan and other post-retirement
benefit costs in the Utility segment on a volumetric basis to reflect the fact that the Utility segment experiences higher throughput of natural
gas in the winter months and lower throughput of natural gas in the summer months. |
Employer Contributions. During the six months ended March 31, 2007, the Company contributed
$11.4 million to its retirement plan and $27.6 million to its other post-retirement benefit plan.
In the remainder of 2007, the Company expects to contribute in the range of $3.0 million to $7.0
million to its retirement plan and to contribute in the range of $12.0 million to $16.0 million to
its other post-retirement benefit plan.
Note 8 Subsequent Event
On April 30, 2007, the Company repaid $96.3 million of 6.5% unsecured notes. Such amount was
classified as Current Portion of Long-Term Debt on the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet at
March 31, 2007. These notes were callable by the Company at par at any time after September 15,
2006.
-21-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
OVERVIEW
The Company is a diversified energy company consisting of five reportable business segments.
For the quarter ended March 31, 2007 compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2006, the Company has
experienced a slight decrease in earnings primarily due to lower earnings in the Pipeline and
Storage, and Exploration and Production segments. Higher earnings in the Utility, Energy
Marketing, and Timber segments largely offset these decreases. For the six months ended March 31,
2007 compared to the six months ended March 31, 2006, the Company experienced a decrease in
earnings of $3.0 million due primarily to lower earnings in the Pipeline and Storage, and
Exploration and Production segments. Higher earnings in the Energy Marketing segment and the
Corporate and All Other categories partially offset these decreases. The Companys earnings are
discussed further in the Results of Operations section that follows.
From a capital resources and liquidity perspective, the Company spent $132.3 million on
capital expenditures during the six months ended March 31, 2007, with approximately 72% being spent
in the Exploration and Production segment. This is in line with the Companys expectations.
The Company is still pursuing its Empire Connector project to expand its natural gas pipeline
operations. On December 21, 2006, FERC issued an order granting a Certificate of Public
Convenience and Necessity authorizing the construction and operation of the Empire Connector and
various other related pipeline projects by other unaffiliated companies. Empire has accepted that
Certificate and has also filed a request for clarification of limited aspects of the December 21,
2006 order. The Company expects to make a final decision by May 31, 2007 on whether it will build
these facilities and place them in service by November 2008.* The total cost of the Empire
Connector project is estimated at $177 million, which is higher than the costs estimated in
Empires 2005 application.* The Company is seeking to mitigate the impact of this cost increase.
There are no other significant changes in the status of the project. The project is discussed
further in the Capital Resources and Liquidity section that follows.
The Company also began repurchasing outstanding shares of common stock during fiscal 2006
under a share repurchase program authorized by the Companys Board of Directors. The program
authorizes the Company to repurchase up to an aggregate amount of 8 million shares. Through March
31, 2007, the Company had repurchased 3,721,878 shares for $128.5 million under this program,
including 1,195,328 shares for $43.3 million during the six months ended March 31, 2007. These
matters are discussed further in the Capital Resources and Liquidity section that follows.
On January 29, 2007, the Company commenced a rate case in the New York rate jurisdiction of
the Utility segment by filing proposed tariff amendments and supporting testimony requesting
approval to increase its annual revenues by $52.0 million annually. The Company explains in the
filing that its request for rate relief is necessitated by decreased revenues resulting from
customer conservation efforts and increased customer uncollectibles, among other things. The rate
filing also includes a proposal for an aggressive efficiency and conservation initiative with a
revenue decoupling mechanism designed to render the Company indifferent to throughput reductions
resulting from conservation. This matter is discussed more fully in the Rate and Regulatory
Matters section that follows.
On April 7, 2006, the NYPSC, PaPUC, and Pennsylvania Office of Consumer Advocate filed a
complaint and motion for summary disposition against Supply Corporation with the FERC. The
complainants alleged that Supply Corporations rates were unjust and unreasonable, and that Supply
Corporation was permitted to retain more gas from shippers than it needed for fuel and loss. A
settlement was reached with all parties and filed with the FERC in November 2006. On February 9,
2007, the FERC issued an order approving the settlement among the parties and Supply Corporation.
No parties sought rehearing or challenged the settlement in court, so the settlement is now final
and unappealable. This matter is discussed more fully in the Rate and Regulatory Matters and
Results of Operations sections that follow.
-22-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
Lastly, the Company recently announced plans for its Exploration and Production unit, Seneca,
to explore the sale of SECI, Senecas wholly owned subsidiary that operates in Canada. Seneca
plans to focus on areas of value and recent success for its properties in the Gulf of Mexico,
maintain its California properties in the West, and dedicate significant additional resources to
the development of its Appalachian properties.*
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
For a complete discussion of critical accounting estimates, refer to Critical Accounting
Estimates in Item 7 of the Companys 2006 Form 10-K. There have been no subsequent changes to
that disclosure.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Earnings
The Companys earnings were $78.4 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 compared to
earnings of $78.6 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2006. The slight decrease in earnings is
primarily the result of lower earnings in the Pipeline and Storage, and Exploration and Production
segments, largely offset by higher earnings in the Utility, Energy Marketing, and Timber segments.
The Exploration and Production segments earnings for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 include a
$5.1 million benefit to earnings resulting from an adjustment to a deferred income tax balance.
The Companys earnings were $133.0 million for the six months ended March 31, 2007 compared to
earnings of $136.0 million for the six months ended March 31, 2006. The decrease in earnings of
$3.0 million is primarily the result of lower earnings in the Pipeline and Storage, and Exploration
and Production segments, partially offset by higher earnings in the Energy Marketing segment and
the Corporate and All Other categories. As mentioned above, earnings for the six months ended
March 31, 2006 include a $5.1 million deferred income tax benefit in the Exploration and Production
segment.
Additional discussion of earnings in each of the business segments can be found in the
business segment information that follows. Note that all amounts used in the earnings discussions
are after tax amounts.
Earnings (Loss) by Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
(Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Utility |
|
$ |
33,444 |
|
|
$ |
28,654 |
|
|
$ |
4,790 |
|
|
$ |
50,618 |
|
|
$ |
50,407 |
|
|
$ |
211 |
|
Pipeline and Storage |
|
|
13,936 |
|
|
|
16,892 |
|
|
|
(2,956 |
) |
|
|
27,624 |
|
|
|
32,742 |
|
|
|
(5,118 |
) |
Exploration and Production |
|
|
19,801 |
|
|
|
25,845 |
|
|
|
(6,044 |
) |
|
|
40,523 |
|
|
|
43,280 |
|
|
|
(2,757 |
) |
Energy Marketing |
|
|
6,706 |
|
|
|
3,877 |
|
|
|
2,829 |
|
|
|
7,198 |
|
|
|
4,864 |
|
|
|
2,334 |
|
Timber |
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
|
2,242 |
|
|
|
958 |
|
|
|
3,417 |
|
|
|
3,706 |
|
|
|
(289 |
) |
|
Total Reportable Segments |
|
|
77,087 |
|
|
|
77,510 |
|
|
|
(423 |
) |
|
|
129,380 |
|
|
|
134,999 |
|
|
|
(5,619 |
) |
All Other |
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
837 |
|
Corporate (1) |
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
1,038 |
|
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
2,134 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
1,736 |
|
|
Total Consolidated |
|
$ |
78,447 |
|
|
$ |
78,594 |
|
|
$ |
(147 |
) |
|
$ |
132,967 |
|
|
$ |
136,013 |
|
|
$ |
(3,046 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes earnings from the former International segments activity. |
-23-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations (Cont.)
Utility
Utility Operating Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
(Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Retail Sales Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
$ |
394,218 |
|
|
$ |
422,495 |
|
|
$ |
(28,277 |
) |
|
$ |
619,650 |
|
|
$ |
767,368 |
|
|
$ |
(147,718 |
) |
Commercial |
|
|
67,469 |
|
|
|
75,758 |
|
|
|
(8,289 |
) |
|
|
103,105 |
|
|
|
132,648 |
|
|
|
(29,543 |
) |
Industrial |
|
|
3,748 |
|
|
|
6,272 |
|
|
|
(2,524 |
) |
|
|
5,649 |
|
|
|
10,724 |
|
|
|
(5,075 |
) |
|
|
|
|
465,435 |
|
|
|
504,525 |
|
|
|
(39,090 |
) |
|
|
728,404 |
|
|
|
910,740 |
|
|
|
(182,336 |
) |
|
Transportation |
|
|
38,464 |
|
|
|
32,360 |
|
|
|
6,104 |
|
|
|
65,340 |
|
|
|
59,276 |
|
|
|
6,064 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,515 |
|
|
|
5,031 |
|
|
|
(1,516 |
) |
|
|
6,482 |
|
|
|
7,501 |
|
|
|
(1,019 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
507,414 |
|
|
$ |
541,916 |
|
|
$ |
(34,502 |
) |
|
$ |
800,226 |
|
|
$ |
977,517 |
|
|
$ |
(177,291 |
) |
|
Utility Throughput
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
(MMcf) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Retail Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
29,372 |
|
|
|
26,807 |
|
|
|
2,565 |
|
|
|
46,050 |
|
|
|
46,331 |
|
|
|
(281 |
) |
Commercial |
|
|
5,428 |
|
|
|
5,038 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
8,296 |
|
|
|
8,481 |
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
Industrial |
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
35,123 |
|
|
|
32,304 |
|
|
|
2,819 |
|
|
|
54,860 |
|
|
|
55,598 |
|
|
|
(738 |
) |
|
Transportation |
|
|
24,723 |
|
|
|
22,119 |
|
|
|
2,604 |
|
|
|
40,576 |
|
|
|
36,461 |
|
|
|
4,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
59,846 |
|
|
|
54,423 |
|
|
|
5,423 |
|
|
|
95,436 |
|
|
|
92,059 |
|
|
|
3,377 |
|
|
Degree Days
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colder (Warmer) Than |
March 31 |
|
Normal |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Normal |
|
Prior Year |
|
Buffalo |
|
|
3,327 |
|
|
|
3,327 |
|
|
|
2,875 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
Erie |
|
|
3,142 |
|
|
|
3,152 |
|
|
|
2,705 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buffalo |
|
|
5,587 |
|
|
|
5,274 |
|
|
|
5,085 |
|
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
3.7 |
|
Erie |
|
|
5,223 |
|
|
|
5,030 |
|
|
|
4,753 |
|
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
2007 Compared with 2006
Operating revenues for the Utility segment decreased $34.5 million for the quarter ended March
31, 2007 as compared with the quarter ended March 31, 2006. The decrease is attributable primarily
to lower retail gas sales revenues. Retail gas sales revenues decreased $39.1 million largely due
to the recovery of lower gas costs (gas costs are recovered dollar for dollar in revenues), which
more than offset the increase in retail gas sales revenues resulting from higher volumes. The
increase in volumes primarily reflects colder weather for the period. Partially offsetting this
decrease in operating revenues was an increase in transportation revenues of $6.1 million. This
increase is primarily attributable to the migration of retail customers to transportation service.
Also, in the Pennsylvania jurisdiction, the impact
of a base rate increase, which became effective in January 2007, increased operating revenues
in the quarter by $4.7 million.
Operating revenues for the Utility segment decreased $177.3 million for the six months ended
March 31, 2007 as compared with the six months ended March 31, 2006. The decrease is primarily
attributable to lower retail gas sales revenues. The decrease in retail gas sales revenues was
largely a function of the recovery of lower gas costs, and, to a lesser extent, slightly lower
throughput, as shown
-24-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
above. Partially offsetting this decrease was an increase in transportation revenues of $6.1
million, largely due to a 4.1 Bcf increase in transportation throughput. The $6.1 million increase
in transportation revenues would have been greater if not for the impact of a $3.9 million positive
out-of-period adjustment recorded in the first quarter of 2006 to correct Distribution
Corporations calculation of the symmetrical sharing component of New Yorks gas adjustment rate.
The increase in transportation throughput is primarily attributable to the migration of retail
customers to transportation service. Slightly offsetting these decreases, in the Pennsylvania
jurisdiction, the impact of a base rate increase, which became effective in January 2007, increased
operating revenues for the six-month period by $4.7 million.
The Utility segments earnings for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 were $33.44 million, an
increase of $4.79 million when compared with earnings of $28.65 million for the quarter ended March
31, 2006. In the Pennsylvania jurisdiction, earnings increased by $6.1 million primarily due to
the impact of a base rate increase ($3.0 million), discussed above, colder weather ($1.8 million),
and a lower effective tax rate ($1.3 million). In the New York jurisdiction, earnings decreased by
$1.3 million principally due to higher operating expenses.
The impact of weather variations on earnings in the New York jurisdiction is mitigated by that
jurisdictions WNC. The WNC in New York, which covers the eight-month period from October through
May, has had a stabilizing effect on earnings for the New York rate jurisdiction. For the quarter
ended March 31, 2007, the WNC preserved earnings of approximately $0.8 million, as weather was
slightly warmer than normal for the period. For the quarter ended March 31, 2006, the WNC
preserved earnings of approximately $4.2 million, as weather was warmer than normal for that period
as well.
The Utility segments earnings for the six months ended March 31, 2007 were $50.6 million, an
increase of $0.2 million when compared with the earnings of $50.4 million for the six months ended
March 31, 2006. In the Pennsylvania jurisdiction, earnings increased $5.8 million due primarily to
a base rate increase that became effective in January 2007 ($3.0 million), discussed above, colder
weather ($2.1 million), and a lower effective tax rate ($1.4 million). Higher intercompany and
other interest expense of $0.6 million partly offset these increases. In the New York jurisdiction,
earnings decreased $5.6 million due primarily to the out-of-period symmetrical sharing adjustment
discussed above ($2.6 million), higher bad debt and other operating costs ($2.7 million), and
higher property taxes ($0.5 million).
For the six months ended March 31, 2007, the WNC preserved earnings of approximately $2.4
million, as the weather was warmer than normal. For the six months ended March 31, 2006, the WNC
preserved earnings of approximately $4.7 million, as the weather was also warmer than normal.
Pipeline and Storage
Pipeline and Storage Operating Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
(Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Firm Transportation |
|
$ |
31,774 |
|
|
$ |
31,738 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
61,262 |
|
|
$ |
62,824 |
|
|
$ |
(1,562 |
) |
Interruptible Transportation |
|
|
955 |
|
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
1,901 |
|
|
|
2,438 |
|
|
|
(537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
32,729 |
|
|
|
32,853 |
|
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
63,163 |
|
|
|
65,262 |
|
|
|
(2,099 |
) |
|
Firm Storage Service |
|
|
16,790 |
|
|
|
16,408 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
33,192 |
|
|
|
32,655 |
|
|
|
537 |
|
Other |
|
|
6,317 |
|
|
|
9,796 |
|
|
|
(3,479 |
) |
|
|
9,658 |
|
|
|
17,174 |
|
|
|
(7,516 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
55,836 |
|
|
$ |
59,057 |
|
|
$ |
(3,221 |
) |
|
$ |
106,013 |
|
|
$ |
115,091 |
|
|
$ |
(9,078 |
) |
|
Pipeline and Storage Throughput
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(MMcf) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Decrease |
|
Firm Transportation |
|
|
120,631 |
|
|
|
114,828 |
|
|
|
5,803 |
|
|
|
195,058 |
|
|
|
217,650 |
|
|
|
(22,592 |
) |
Interruptible Transportation |
|
|
932 |
|
|
|
1,831 |
|
|
|
(899 |
) |
|
|
1,927 |
|
|
|
5,554 |
|
|
|
(3,627 |
) |
|
|
|
|
121,563 |
|
|
|
116,659 |
|
|
|
4,904 |
|
|
|
196,985 |
|
|
|
223,204 |
|
|
|
(26,219 |
) |
|
-25-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
2007 Compared with 2006
Operating revenues for the Pipeline and Storage segment decreased $3.2 million for the quarter
ended March 31, 2007 as compared with the quarter ended March 31, 2006. The decrease was primarily
due to lower efficiency gas revenues ($4.9 million) reported as part of other revenues in the table
above. This decrease was due primarily to the Companys recent settlement with the FERC, which
decreased the efficiency gas retainage allowances, coupled with lower gas prices in the three
months ended March 31, 2007 as compared with the three months ended March 31, 2006. This decrease
was offset by a $1.4 million increase in other revenues attributable to the lease termination fee
adjustment in 2006 (an intercompany transaction) for the Companys former corporate headquarters,
which did not recur in 2007. In addition, there was a $0.4 million increase in firm storage
service attributable to an increase in storage rates that began in April 2006.
Operating revenues for the Pipeline and Storage Segment for the six months ended March 31,
2007 decreased $9.1 million as compared with the six months ended March 31, 2006. The decrease was
primarily due to lower efficiency gas revenues ($9.0 million) reported as part of other revenues in
the table above. This decrease was due primarily to the Companys recent settlement with the FERC,
which decreased the efficiency gas retainage allowances, coupled with lower gas prices during the
six months ended March 31, 2007 as compared with the six months ended March 31, 2006. In addition,
there was a $1.6 million decrease to transportation/storage revenues caused by the Utility
segments reduction in their firm contract volumes in fiscal 2007, coupled with non-recurring
market conditions resulting from the effect of hurricane damage to production and pipeline
infrastructure in the Gulf of Mexico during the fall of 2005. Offsetting these decreases was a
$1.4 million increase in other revenues attributable to the lease termination fee adjustment
discussed above.
The Pipeline and Storage segments earnings for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 were $13.9
million, a decrease of $3.0 million when compared with earnings of $16.9 million for the quarter
ended March 31, 2006. The decrease primarily reflects the earnings impact associated with lower
efficiency gas revenues ($3.2 million). It also reflects higher operation costs of $0.5 million
and higher interest expense of $0.9 million. These earnings decreases were partially offset by an
earnings increase due to lower depreciation expense ($1.0 million) due to decreased depreciation
rates agreed upon by the FERC in the most recent rate settlement. The FERC settlement impacted
three specific financial areas: efficiency gas revenues, depreciation expense, and post-retirement
benefit expense. As previously mentioned, the settlement called for a decrease to efficiency gas
revenues and a decrease to
depreciation rates. As for post-retirement benefit expense, the settlement called for an
increase that is reflected in higher operation costs discussed above.
The Pipeline and Storage segments earnings for the six months ended March 31, 2007 were $27.6
million, a decrease of $5.1 million when compared with earnings of $32.7 million for the six months
ended March 31, 2006. The decrease reflects the earnings impact associated with lower efficiency
gas revenues ($5.8 million) due to the recent FERC settlement. It also reflects the earnings
impact of lower transportation and storage service revenues ($1.0 million), and higher intercompany
interest expense of $2.0 million. These earnings decreases were partially offset by an earnings
increase due to lower depreciation expense ($1.0 million), which was caused by decreased
depreciation rates agreed upon by the FERC in the most recent rate settlement. There was a $1.9
million positive earnings impact associated with the discontinuance of hedge accounting for
Empires interest rate collar. On December 8, 2006, Empire repaid $22.8 million of secured debt.
The interest costs of this secured debt were hedged by the interest rate collar. Since the hedged
transaction was settled and there will be no future cash flows associated with the secured debt,
the unrealized gain in accumulated other comprehensive income associated with the interest rate
collar was reclassified to the income statement.
-26-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
Exploration and Production
Exploration and Production Operating Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
(Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Gas (after Hedging) |
|
$ |
48,156 |
|
|
$ |
49,432 |
|
|
$ |
(1,276 |
) |
|
$ |
95,170 |
|
|
$ |
98,774 |
|
|
$ |
(3,604 |
) |
Oil (after Hedging) |
|
|
41,599 |
|
|
|
36,262 |
|
|
|
5,337 |
|
|
|
79,925 |
|
|
|
65,656 |
|
|
|
14,269 |
|
Gas Processing Plant |
|
|
9,117 |
|
|
|
10,662 |
|
|
|
(1,545 |
) |
|
|
17,746 |
|
|
|
24,082 |
|
|
|
(6,336 |
) |
Other |
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
770 |
|
|
|
1,835 |
|
|
|
(1,065 |
) |
Intrasegment Elimination (1) |
|
|
(6,443 |
) |
|
|
(7,949 |
) |
|
|
1,506 |
|
|
|
(12,293 |
) |
|
|
(19,541 |
) |
|
|
7,248 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
92,610 |
|
|
$ |
88,719 |
|
|
$ |
3,891 |
|
|
$ |
181,318 |
|
|
$ |
170,806 |
|
|
$ |
10,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the elimination of certain West Coast gas production included in
Gas (after Hedging) in the table above that was sold to the gas processing plant shown in the
table above. An elimination for the same dollar amount was made to reduce the gas processing
plants Purchased Gas expense. |
Production Volumes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Gas Production (MMcf) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf Coast |
|
|
2,893 |
|
|
|
2,752 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
5,616 |
|
|
|
4,419 |
|
|
|
1,197 |
|
West Coast |
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
933 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
1,865 |
|
|
|
1,951 |
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
Appalachia |
|
|
1,339 |
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
2,732 |
|
|
|
2,499 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
Canada |
|
|
1,856 |
|
|
|
1,761 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
3,577 |
|
|
|
3,672 |
|
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
|
|
7,008 |
|
|
|
6,692 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
13,790 |
|
|
|
12,541 |
|
|
|
1,249 |
|
|
Oil Production (Mbbl) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf Coast |
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
West Coast |
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
1,190 |
|
|
|
1,324 |
|
|
|
(134 |
) |
Appalachia |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Canada |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
865 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
1,741 |
|
|
|
1,789 |
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
Average Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Average Gas Price/Mcf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf Coast |
|
$ |
6.42 |
|
|
$ |
8.47 |
|
|
$ |
(2.05 |
) |
|
$ |
6.48 |
|
|
$ |
9.33 |
|
|
$ |
(2.85 |
) |
West Coast |
|
$ |
6.95 |
|
|
$ |
8.02 |
|
|
$ |
(1.07 |
) |
|
$ |
6.51 |
|
|
$ |
9.62 |
|
|
$ |
(3.11 |
) |
Appalachia |
|
$ |
7.39 |
|
|
$ |
10.03 |
|
|
$ |
(2.64 |
) |
|
$ |
7.30 |
|
|
$ |
11.83 |
|
|
$ |
(4.53 |
) |
Canada |
|
$ |
5.87 |
|
|
$ |
7.21 |
|
|
$ |
(1.34 |
) |
|
$ |
6.12 |
|
|
$ |
9.06 |
|
|
$ |
(2.94 |
) |
Weighted Average |
|
$ |
6.53 |
|
|
$ |
8.37 |
|
|
$ |
(1.84 |
) |
|
$ |
6.56 |
|
|
$ |
9.79 |
|
|
$ |
(3.23 |
) |
Weighted Average After Hedging |
|
$ |
6.87 |
|
|
$ |
7.39 |
|
|
$ |
(0.52 |
) |
|
$ |
6.90 |
|
|
$ |
7.88 |
|
|
$ |
(0.98 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Oil Price/bbl |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gulf Coast |
|
$ |
57.21 |
|
|
$ |
58.69 |
|
|
$ |
(1.48 |
) |
|
$ |
56.84 |
|
|
$ |
58.39 |
|
|
$ |
(1.55 |
) |
West Coast |
|
$ |
49.99 |
|
|
$ |
53.65 |
|
|
$ |
(3.66 |
) |
|
$ |
50.55 |
|
|
$ |
52.46 |
|
|
$ |
(1.91 |
) |
Appalachia |
|
$ |
57.88 |
|
|
$ |
60.28 |
|
|
$ |
(2.40 |
) |
|
$ |
58.76 |
|
|
$ |
60.84 |
|
|
$ |
(2.08 |
) |
Canada |
|
$ |
49.98 |
|
|
$ |
48.63 |
|
|
$ |
1.35 |
|
|
$ |
46.45 |
|
|
$ |
45.57 |
|
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
Weighted Average |
|
$ |
51.73 |
|
|
$ |
54.37 |
|
|
$ |
(2.64 |
) |
|
$ |
51.91 |
|
|
$ |
52.92 |
|
|
$ |
(1.01 |
) |
Weighted Average After Hedging |
|
$ |
48.09 |
|
|
$ |
40.30 |
|
|
$ |
7.79 |
|
|
$ |
45.90 |
|
|
$ |
36.70 |
|
|
$ |
9.20 |
|
|
-27-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
2007 Compared with 2006
Operating revenues for the Exploration and Production segment increased $3.9 million for the
quarter ended March 31, 2007 as compared with the quarter ended March 31, 2006. Oil production
revenue after hedging increased $5.3 million due to a $7.79 per barrel increase in weighted average
prices after hedging. Gas production revenue after hedging decreased $1.3 million due to a
decrease in the weighted average price of gas after hedging ($0.52 per Mcf). This was offset
slightly by an overall increase in gas production of 316 MMcf. While oil prices before hedging
decreased quarter over quarter, many of the lower priced hedges in place during the quarter ended
March 31, 2006 expired and were not replaced, resulting in an increase to the weighted average oil
price after hedging received for this segments oil production during the quarter ended March 31,
2007.
Operating revenues for the Exploration and Production segment increased $10.5 million for the
six months ended March 31, 2007 as compared with the six months ended March 31, 2006. Oil
production revenue after hedging increased $14.3 million due to a $9.20 per barrel increase in
weighted average prices after hedging. While oil prices before hedging decreased for the six
months ended March 31, 2007 as compared with the six months ended March 31, 2006, many of the lower
priced hedges in place during the six months ended March 31, 2006 expired and were not replaced,
resulting in an increase to the weighted average oil price after hedging received for this
segments oil production during the six months ended March 31, 2007. Gas production revenue after
hedging decreased $3.6 million. An increase in gas production of 1,249 MMcf more than offset a
decrease in the weighted average price of gas after hedging ($0.98 per Mcf). The increase in gas
production occurred primarily in the Gulf Coast region (1,197 MMcf). During the quarter ended
December 31, 2005, Seneca experienced significant production delays due largely to the impact of
hurricane damage to pipeline infrastructure in the Gulf of Mexico. Seneca had substantially all of
its pre-hurricane Gulf of Mexico production back on line at the beginning of fiscal 2007.
The Exploration and Production segments earnings for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 were
$19.8 million, a decrease of $6.0 million when compared with earnings of $25.8 million for the
quarter ended March 31, 2006. The decrease is primarily attributable to a $5.1 million benefit to
earnings, recognized during the quarter ended March 31, 2006, resulting from an adjustment to a
deferred income tax balance. While higher crude oil prices and higher natural gas production
increased earnings by $4.4 million and $1.5 million, respectively, lower natural gas prices and
lower crude oil production decreased
earnings by $2.4 million and $0.9 million, respectively. Earnings were also negatively impacted by
a higher effective tax rate ($3.8 million), largely due to higher New York State taxes. The
Company files a combined New York State tax return and allocates such state tax among all
subsidiaries.
The Exploration and Production segments earnings for the six months ended March 31, 2007 were
$40.5 million, a decrease of $2.8 million when compared with earnings of $43.3 million for the
quarter ended March 31, 2006. The decrease can be attributed to the $5.1 million benefit to
earnings recognized during the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as discussed above, combined with an
additional $4.1 million earnings reduction associated with a higher effective tax rate, as
discussed above. While higher crude oil prices and higher natural gas production increased earnings
by $10.4 million and $6.4 million, respectively, lower natural gas prices and lower crude oil
production decreased earnings by $8.8 million and $1.1 million, respectively.
Energy Marketing
Energy Marketing Operating Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
(Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Natural Gas (after Hedging) |
|
$ |
163,274 |
|
|
$ |
206,057 |
|
|
$ |
(42,783 |
) |
|
$ |
246,544 |
|
|
$ |
351,580 |
|
|
$ |
(105,036 |
) |
Other |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
163,338 |
|
|
$ |
206,061 |
|
|
$ |
(42,723 |
) |
|
$ |
246,656 |
|
|
$ |
351,620 |
|
|
$ |
(104,964 |
) |
|
-28-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
Energy Marketing Volumes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Increase |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Increase |
|
Natural Gas (MMcf) |
|
|
19,935 |
|
|
|
17,332 |
|
|
|
2,603 |
|
|
|
31,049 |
|
|
|
27,306 |
|
|
|
3,743 |
|
|
2007 Compared with 2006
Operating revenues for the Energy Marketing segment decreased $42.7 million and $105.0
million, respectively, for the quarter and six months ended March 31, 2007, as compared with the
quarter and six months ended March 31, 2006. The decrease for both the quarter and six months
ended March 31, 2007 primarily reflects lower gas sales revenue due to a decrease in natural gas
commodity prices that were recovered through revenues, offset in part by an increase in throughput.
The increase in throughput was due to the addition of certain large, low-margin commercial and
industrial customers, as well as colder weather.
Earnings in the Energy Marketing segment increased $2.8 million and $2.3 million,
respectively, for the quarter and six months ended March 31, 2007 as compared with the quarter and
six months ended March 31, 2006. Higher margins of $3.1 million and $2.6 million, respectively,
for the quarter and six-month periods are responsible for these increases. The increase in margin
is mainly the result of a $2.3 million reversal of an accrual for purchased gas expense related to
the resolution of a contingency during the quarter ended March 31, 2007. The increase in
throughput noted above, as well as greater financial benefits recognized from increased storage
capacity utilization and price differentials, also contributed to the increase in margin.
Timber
Timber Operating Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Decrease |
|
Log Sales |
|
$ |
9,381 |
|
|
$ |
8,267 |
|
|
$ |
1,114 |
|
|
$ |
13,446 |
|
|
$ |
14,523 |
|
|
$ |
(1,077 |
) |
Green Lumber Sales |
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
|
1,968 |
|
|
|
(621 |
) |
|
|
2,265 |
|
|
|
3,430 |
|
|
|
(1,165 |
) |
Kiln Dry Lumber Sales |
|
|
7,225 |
|
|
|
8,384 |
|
|
|
(1,159 |
) |
|
|
13,495 |
|
|
|
16,885 |
|
|
|
(3,390 |
) |
Other |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
(284 |
) |
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
1,228 |
|
|
|
(487 |
) |
|
Operating Revenues |
|
$ |
18,184 |
|
|
$ |
19,134 |
|
|
$ |
(950 |
) |
|
$ |
29,947 |
|
|
$ |
36,066 |
|
|
$ |
(6,119 |
) |
|
Timber Board Feet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
(Thousands) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Decrease |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Decrease |
|
Log Sales |
|
|
3,025 |
|
|
|
3,282 |
|
|
|
(257 |
) |
|
|
4,734 |
|
|
|
5,774 |
|
|
|
(1,040 |
) |
Green Lumber Sales |
|
|
2,380 |
|
|
|
2,982 |
|
|
|
(602 |
) |
|
|
3,910 |
|
|
|
4,956 |
|
|
|
(1,046 |
) |
Kiln Dry Lumber Sales |
|
|
3,794 |
|
|
|
4,512 |
|
|
|
(718 |
) |
|
|
6,952 |
|
|
|
8,998 |
|
|
|
(2,046 |
) |
|
|
|
|
9,199 |
|
|
|
10,776 |
|
|
|
(1,577 |
) |
|
|
15,596 |
|
|
|
19,728 |
|
|
|
(4,132 |
) |
|
-29-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
2007 Compared with 2006
Operating revenues for the Timber segment decreased $1.0 million and $6.1 million,
respectively, for the quarter and six months ended March 31, 2007, as compared with the quarter and
six months ended March 31, 2006. For the quarter ended March 31, 2007, the decrease can be
primarily attributed to a decrease in kiln dry lumber sales ($1.2 million and 718,000 board feet)
and green lumber sales ($0.6 million and 602,000 board feet). There were fewer logs available for
processing due to unfavorable weather conditions earlier in the fiscal year that greatly limited
the harvesting of logs. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in cherry veneer log
sales ($1.2 million and 146,000 board feet increase) as a result of favorable weather conditions in
March 2007 allowing for an increase in harvesting, as compared to unfavorable weather conditions
that limited harvesting in March 2006. Although there was an overall decrease in log sales volumes
in the table above, most of the decrease came from lower priced logs. Cherry veneer logs command
the highest prices and have the largest impact on overall log sales revenue. For the six months
ended March 31, 2007, the decrease in revenues can be attributed to unfavorable weather conditions
primarily during the first quarter of fiscal 2007 that greatly diminished the harvesting of logs.
These conditions consisted of warm, wet weather that made it difficult to bring logging trucks into
the forests. Weather conditions were significantly more favorable throughout the six months ended
March 31, 2006. These unfavorable conditions for harvesting resulted in a decline in log sales of
$1.1 million or 1.0 million board feet. There was also a decline in both green lumber and kiln dry
lumber sales of $1.2 million and $3.4 million, respectively, since there were fewer logs available
for processing.
Earnings in the Timber segment were $3.2 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, an
increase of $1.0 million when compared with earnings of $2.2 million for the quarter ended March
31, 2006. This increase was the result of higher margins from log and lumber sales of $0.6 million
as well as a decline in depletion expense of $0.5 million. The decrease in depletion expense
reflects the cutting of more low cost or no cost basis timber from Company owned land.
The Timber segments earnings were $3.4 million for the six months ended March 31, 2007, a
decrease of $0.3 million when compared with earnings of $3.7 million for the six months ended March
31, 2006. The decrease was primarily due to lower margins from lumber and log sales ($1.0 million)
as a result of the decline in revenues noted above. Partially offsetting this decrease was a
decline in depletion expense of $0.9 million. The decrease in depletion expense reflects the
cutting of more low cost or no cost basis timber from Company owned land.
Corporate and All Other
2007 Compared with 2006
Corporate and All Other recorded earnings of $1.4 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2007
compared with earnings of $1.1 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2006. For the six months
ended March 31, 2006, Corporate and All Other had earnings of $3.6 million compared with earnings
of $1.0 million for the six months ended March 31, 2006. These improvements were largely due to an
increase in intercompany interest income of $1.4 million and $2.8 million, respectively, for the
quarter and six-month periods. On a consolidated basis, all significant intercompany balances and
transactions are eliminated. A death benefit gain on life insurance proceeds ($1.9 million) was
recognized in the Corporate category during the current quarter as noted below under Other
Income, but was largely offset by an out-of-period pension expense adjustment associated with the
Companys Non-Qualified defined benefit plan of $1.8 million. The Corporate and All Other
category also experienced higher operating costs of $0.5 million and $0.4 million, respectively,
for the quarter and six-month periods, exclusive of the pension expense adjustment, and higher
interest expense of $0.4 million and $0.8 million, respectively, for the quarter and six-month
periods. Horizon LFGs earnings benefited from higher margins of $0.3 million and $0.7 million,
respectively, for the quarter and six-month periods.
Other Income
Other income increased $2.3 million for both the quarter and six months ended March 31, 2007
as compared to the quarter and six months ended March 31, 2006. The increase can be attributed to
a death benefit gain on life insurance proceeds of $1.9 million recognized in the Corporate
category.
-30-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
Interest Charges
Interest on long-term debt decreased $0.3 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as
compared with the quarter ended March 31, 2006. For the six months ended March 31, 2007, interest
on long-term debt decreased $2.4 million as compared with the six months ended March 31, 2006 due
to a $1.9 million benefit to interest expense as a result of the discontinuance of hedge accounting
for Empires interest rate collar, as discussed above under Pipeline and Storage. The underlying
long-term debt associated with this interest rate collar was repaid in December 2006 and the
unrealized gain recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income associated with the interest
rate collar was reclassified to interest expense during the quarter ended December 31, 2006.
Income Tax Expense
The Companys effective income tax rate for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 was approximately
41%, up from approximately 35% for the quarter ended March 31, 2006. The effective income tax rate
increased primarily as a result of the income tax benefit of $5.1 million that was recognized in
the Exploration and Production segment in the quarter ended March 31, 2006 that did not recur in
2007. It also reflects higher New York State taxes in the Exploration and Production segment. The
Company files a combined New York State tax return and allocates such state tax among all
subsidiaries.
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
The Companys primary source of cash during the six-month period ended March 31, 2007
consisted of cash provided by operating activities. This source of cash was supplemented by issues
of new shares of common stock as a result of stock option exercises. During the six months ended
March 31, 2007, the common stock used to fulfill the requirements of the Companys 401(k) plans and
Direct Stock Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Plan was obtained via open market purchases.
During fiscal 2006, the Company began repurchasing outstanding shares of its common stock under a
share repurchase program, which is discussed below under Financing Cash Flow.
Operating Cash Flow
Internally generated cash from operating activities consists of net income available for
common stock, adjusted for non-cash expenses, non-cash income and changes in operating assets and
liabilities. Non-cash items include depreciation, depletion and amortization, deferred income
taxes, and income or loss from unconsolidated subsidiaries net of cash distributions.
Cash provided by operating activities in the Utility and the Pipeline and Storage segments may
vary from period to period because of the impact of rate cases. In the Utility segment, supplier
refunds, over- or under-recovered purchased gas costs and weather may also significantly impact
cash flow. The impact of weather on cash flow is tempered in the Utility segments New York rate
jurisdiction by its WNC and in the Pipeline and Storage segment by Supply Corporations straight
fixed-variable rate design.
Because of the seasonal nature of the heating business in the Utility and Energy Marketing
segments, revenues in these segments are relatively high during the heating season, primarily the
first and second quarters of the fiscal year, and receivable balances historically increase during
these periods from the balances receivable at September 30.
The storage gas inventory normally declines during the first and second quarters of the fiscal
year and is replenished during the third and fourth quarters. For storage gas inventory accounted
for under the LIFO method, the current cost of replacing gas withdrawn from storage is recorded in
the Consolidated Statements of Income and a reserve for gas replacement is recorded in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets under the caption Other Accruals and Current Liabilities. Such
reserve is reduced as the inventory is replenished.
-31-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
Cash provided by operating activities in the Exploration and Production segment may vary from
period to period as a result of changes in the commodity prices of natural gas and crude oil. The
Company uses various derivative financial instruments, including price swap agreements, no cost
collars, options and futures contracts in an attempt to manage this energy commodity price risk.
Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $274.7 million for the six months ended
March 31, 2007, an increase of $31.5 million compared with $243.2 million provided by operating
activities for the six months ended March 31, 2006. The timing of gas cost recovery in the Utility
segment for the six months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the six months ended March 31, 2006
is primarily responsible for the increase.
Investing Cash Flow
Expenditures for Long-Lived Assets
The Companys expenditures for long-lived assets totaled $135.6 million during the six months
ended March 31, 2007. The table below presents these expenditures:
Six Months Ended March 31, 2007 (in millions of dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Capital |
|
Investment |
|
Expenditures for |
|
|
Expenditures |
|
in Partnership |
|
Long-Lived Assets |
|
Utility |
|
$ |
25.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25.6 |
|
Pipeline and Storage |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
Exploration and Production |
|
|
95.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95.9 |
|
Timber |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Corporate and All Other |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
132.3 |
|
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
|
$ |
135.6 |
|
|
Utility
The majority of the Utility capital expenditures for the six months ended March 31, 2007 were
made for replacement of mains and main extensions, as well as for the replacement of service lines.
Pipeline and Storage
The majority of the Pipeline and Storage capital expenditures for the six months ended March
31, 2007 were made for additions, improvements, and replacements to this segments transmission and
gas storage systems.
The Company continues to explore various opportunities to expand its capabilities to transport
gas to the East Coast, either through the Supply Corporation or Empire systems or in partnership
with others. In October 2005, Empire filed an application with the FERC for the authority to build
and operate the Empire Connector project to expand its natural gas pipeline operations to serve new
markets in New York and elsewhere in the Northeast by extending the Empire Pipeline. The
application also asked that Empires existing business and facilities be brought under FERC
jurisdiction, and that FERC approve rates for Empires existing and proposed services. Assuming
the proposed Millennium Pipeline is constructed, the Empire Connector will provide an upstream
supply link for the Millennium Pipeline and will transport Canadian and other natural gas supplies
to downstream customers, including KeySpan Gas East Corporation (Keyspan), which has entered into
precedent agreements to subscribe for at least 150 MDth per day of natural gas transportation
service through the Empire State Pipeline and the Millennium Pipeline systems.* The Empire
Connector will be designed to move up to approximately 250 MDth of natural gas per day.* The
targeted in-service date is November 2008.* FERC issued on December 21, 2006 an order granting a
Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity authorizing the construction and operation of the
Empire Connector and various other related pipeline projects by other unaffiliated companies.
Refer to the Rate and Regulatory Matters section that follows for further discussion of this
matter. The total cost of the Empire Connector project is estimated at $177 million, which is
higher than
-32-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
the costs estimated in Empires 2005 application.* The Company is seeking to mitigate the impact
of this cost increase by competitive bidding and, as discussed in the Rate and Regulatory Matters
section that follows, sales tax exemptions and temporary partial property tax abatements as means
of offsetting the impact of rising construction costs. The Company anticipates financing this
project with cash on hand and/or through the use of the Companys bi-lateral lines of credit.* As
of March 31, 2007, the Company had incurred approximately $7.4 million in costs (all of which have
been reserved) related to this project. Of this amount, $1.0 million and $1.4 million,
respectively, were incurred during the quarter and six months ended March 31, 2007, and $0.5
million and $1.2 million were incurred during the quarter and six months ended March 31, 2006,
respectively. The Company will continue to reserve for project related costs until such time as a
final service agreement is signed with KeySpan, which the Company expects to occur by the end of
May 2007.* At such time, the Company anticipates reversing the reserve that has been established
since it believes that such costs will be recovered as part of rate base.*
Supply Corporation continues to view its potential Tuscarora Extension project as an important
link to Millennium and potential storage development in the Corning, New York area.* This new
pipeline, which would expand the Supply Corporation system from its Tuscarora storage field to the
intersection of the proposed Millennium and Empire Connector pipelines, will be designed initially
to transport up to approximately 130 MDth of natural gas per day. It may also provide Supply
Corporation with the opportunity to increase the deliverability of the existing Tuscarora storage
field.* Supply Corporation has launched an Open Season seeking customers for new capacity from
the Rockies Express Project, Appalachian production, storage and other points to Leidy and to
interconnections with Millennium and Empire at Corning which, if successful, could include the
Tuscarora Extension. The project timeline depends on market development, and should the market
mature, the Company anticipates financing the Tuscarora Extension with cash on hand and/or through
the use of the Companys bi-lateral lines of credit.* There have been no costs incurred by the
Company related to this project as of March 31, 2007. The Company has not yet filed an application with the FERC for the authority to build and operate
the Tuscarora Extension.
Exploration and Production
The Exploration and Production segment capital expenditures for the six months ended March 31,
2007 included approximately $20.0 million for Canada, $41.3 million for the Gulf Coast region
($38.3 million for the off-shore program in the Gulf of Mexico), $22.0 million for the West Coast
region and $12.6 million for the Appalachian region. The significant amount spent in the Gulf
Coast region corresponds to high commodity pricing, which has improved the economics of investment
in the area, plus projected royalty relief. These amounts included approximately $16.8 million
spent to develop proved undeveloped reserves.
Timber
The majority of the Timber segment capital expenditures for the six months ended March 31,
2007 were made for purchases of equipment for Highlands sawmill and kiln operations.
Corporate and All Other
The majority of the Corporate and All Other category expenditures for long-lived assets for
the six months ended March 31, 2007 consisted of a $3.3 million capital contribution to Seneca
Energy by Horizon Power, $1.65 million in each of the first and second quarters of fiscal 2007.
Seneca Energy generates and sells electricity using methane gas obtained from landfills owned by
outside parties. Seneca Energy is in the process of expanding its generating capacity from 11.2
megawatts to 17.6 megawatts. Horizon Power has funded its capital contributions with short-term
borrowings.
The Company continuously evaluates capital expenditures and investments in corporations,
partnerships, and other business entities. The amounts are subject to modification for
opportunities such as the acquisition of attractive oil and gas properties, timber or natural gas
storage facilities and the expansion of transmission line capacities. While the majority of
capital expenditures in the Utility segment are necessitated by the continued need for replacement
and upgrading of mains and service lines, the magnitude of future capital expenditures or other
investments in the Companys other business segments depends, to a large degree, upon market
conditions.*
-33-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
Financing Cash Flow
The Company did not have any outstanding short-term notes payable to banks or commercial paper
at March 31, 2007. The Company continues to consider short-term debt (consisting of short-term
notes payable to banks and commercial paper) an important source of cash for temporarily financing
capital expenditures and investments in corporations and/or partnerships, gas-in-storage inventory,
unrecovered purchased gas costs, margin calls on derivative financial instruments, exploration and
development expenditures, repurchases of stock, and other working capital needs. Fluctuations in
these items can have a significant impact on the amount and timing of short-term debt. As for bank
loans, the Company maintains a number of individual (bi-lateral) uncommitted or discretionary lines
of credit with certain financial institutions for general corporate purposes. Borrowings under
these lines of credit are made at competitive market rates. These credit lines, which aggregate to
$455.0 million, are revocable at the option of the financial institutions and are reviewed on an
annual basis. The Company anticipates that these lines of credit will continue to be renewed, or
replaced by similar lines.* The total amount available to be issued under the Companys commercial
paper program is $300.0 million. The commercial paper program is backed by a syndicated committed
credit facility which totals $300.0 million and extends through September 30, 2010.
Under the Companys committed credit facility, the Company has agreed that its debt to
capitalization ratio will not exceed .65 at the last day of any fiscal quarter from September 30,
2005 through September 30, 2010. At March 31, 2007, the Companys debt to capitalization ratio (as
calculated under the facility) was .42. The constraints specified in the committed credit facility
would permit an additional $1.7 billion in short-term and/or long-term debt to be outstanding
(further limited by the indenture covenants discussed below) before the Companys debt to
capitalization ratio would
exceed .65. If a downgrade in any of the Companys credit ratings were to occur, access to the
commercial paper markets might not be possible.* However, the Company expects that it could borrow
under its uncommitted bank lines of credit or rely upon other liquidity sources, including cash
provided by operations.*
Under the Companys existing indenture covenants, at March 31, 2007, the Company would have
been permitted to issue up to a maximum of $1.1 billion in additional long-term unsecured
indebtedness at then-current market interest rates in addition to being able to issue new
indebtedness to replace maturing debt. The Companys present liquidity position is believed to be
adequate to satisfy known demands.*
The Companys 1974 indenture pursuant to which $399.0 million (or 36%) of the Companys
long-term debt (as of March 31, 2007) was issued, contains a cross-default provision whereby the
failure by the Company to perform certain obligations under other borrowing arrangements could
trigger an obligation to repay the debt outstanding under the indenture. In particular, a
repayment obligation could be triggered if the Company fails (i) to pay any scheduled principal or
interest on any debt under any other indenture or agreement or (ii) to perform any other term in
any other such indenture or agreement, and the effect of the failure causes, or would permit the
holders of the debt to cause, the debt under such indenture or agreement to become due prior to its
stated maturity, unless cured or waived.
The Companys $300.0 million committed credit facility also contains a cross-default provision
whereby the failure by the Company or its significant subsidiaries to make payments under other
borrowing arrangements, or the occurrence of certain events affecting those other borrowing
arrangements, could trigger an obligation to repay any amounts outstanding under the committed
credit facility. In particular, a repayment obligation could be triggered if (i) the Company or
any of its significant subsidiaries fail to make a payment when due of any principal or interest on
any other indebtedness aggregating $20.0 million or more or (ii) an event occurs that causes, or
would permit the holders of any other indebtedness aggregating $20.0 million or more to cause, such
indebtedness to become due prior to its stated maturity. As of March 31, 2007, the Company had no
debt outstanding under the committed credit facility.
-34-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
The Company has an effective registration statement on file with the SEC under which it has
available capacity to issue an additional $550.0 million of debt and equity securities under the
Securities Act of 1933. The Company may sell all or a portion of the remaining registered
securities if warranted by market conditions and the Companys capital requirements. Any offer and
sale of the above mentioned $550.0 million of debt and equity securities will be made only by means
of a prospectus meeting the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and the rules and
regulations thereunder.
The amounts and timing of the issuance and sale of debt or equity securities will depend on
market conditions, indenture requirements, regulatory authorizations and the capital requirements
of the Company.
On April 30, 2007, the Company repaid $96.3 million of 6.5% unsecured notes. Such amount was
classified as Current Portion of Long-Term Debt on the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet at
March 31, 2007. These notes were callable by the Company at par at any time after September 15,
2006. On December 8, 2006, the Company repaid $22.8 million of Empires secured debt. Such amount
was classified as Current Portion of Long-Term Debt on the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet at
September 30, 2006.
On December 8, 2005, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the Company to implement a
share repurchase program, whereby the Company may repurchase outstanding shares of common stock, up
to an aggregate amount of 8 million shares in the open market or through privately negotiated
transactions. As of March 31, 2007, the Company has repurchased 3,721,878 shares for $128.5
million under this program, including 11,400 shares for $0.4 million and 1,195,328 shares for $43.3
million
during the quarter and six months ended March 31, 2007, respectively. These share repurchases
were funded with cash provided by operating activities and/or through the use of the Companys
bi-lateral lines of credit. In the future, it is expected that this share repurchase program will
continue to be funded with cash provided by operating activities and/or through the use of the
Companys bi-lateral lines of credit.* It is expected that open market repurchases will continue
from time to time depending on market conditions.*
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
The Company has entered into certain off-balance sheet financing arrangements. These
financing arrangements are primarily operating and capital leases. The Companys consolidated
subsidiaries have operating leases, the majority of which are with the Utility and the Pipeline and
Storage segments, having a remaining lease commitment of approximately $39.6 million. These leases
have been entered into for the use of buildings, vehicles, construction tools, meters, computer
equipment and other items and are accounted for as operating leases. The Companys unconsolidated
subsidiaries, which are accounted for under the equity method, have capital leases of electric
generating equipment having a remaining lease commitment of approximately $5.7 million. The
Company has guaranteed 50% or $2.9 million of these capital lease commitments.
OTHER MATTERS
In addition to the legal proceedings disclosed in Part II, Item 1 of this report, the Company
is involved in other litigation and regulatory matters arising in the normal course of business.
These other matters may include, for example, negligence claims and tax, regulatory or other
governmental audits, inspections, investigations or other proceedings. These matters may involve
state and federal taxes, safety, compliance with regulations, rate base, cost of service and
purchased gas cost issues, among other things. While these normal-course matters could have a
material effect on earnings and cash flows in the quarterly and annual period in which they are
resolved, they are not expected to change materially the Companys present liquidity position, nor
to have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company.*
Market Risk Sensitive Instruments
For a complete discussion of market risk sensitive instruments, refer to Market Risk
Sensitive Instruments in Item 7 of the Companys 2006 Form 10-K. There have been no subsequent
material changes to the Companys exposure to market risk sensitive instruments.
-35-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
Rate and Regulatory Matters
Utility Operation
Base rate adjustments in both the New York and Pennsylvania jurisdictions do not reflect the
recovery of purchased gas costs. Such costs are recovered through operation of the purchased gas
adjustment clauses of the appropriate regulatory authorities.
New York Jurisdiction
On August 27, 2004, Distribution Corporation commenced a rate case by filing proposed tariff
amendments and supporting testimony requesting approval to increase its annual revenues beginning
October 1, 2004. Various parties opposed the filing. On April 15, 2005, Distribution Corporation,
the parties and others executed an agreement settling all outstanding issues. In an order issued
July 22, 2005, the NYPSC approved the April 15, 2005 settlement agreement, substantially as filed,
for an effective date of August 1, 2005. The settlement agreement provided for a rate increase of
$21 million by means of the elimination of bill credits ($5.8 million) and an increase in base
rates ($15.2 million). For the two-year term of the agreement and until new rates should go into
effect, the return on equity level above which earnings must be shared with rate payers is 11.5%.
On January 29, 2007, Distribution Corporation commenced a rate case by filing proposed tariff
amendments and supporting testimony requesting approval to increase its annual revenues by $52.0
million. Following standard procedure, the NYPSC suspended the proposed tariff amendments to
enable its staff and intervenors to conduct a routine investigation and hold hearings.
Distribution Corporation explains in the filing that its request for rate relief is necessitated by
decreased revenues resulting from customer conservation efforts and increased customer
uncollectibles, among other things. The rate filing also includes a proposal for an aggressive
efficiency and conservation initiative with a revenue decoupling mechanism designed to render the
company indifferent to throughput reductions resulting from conservation. The NYPSC may accept,
reject or modify the Companys filing. Assuming standard procedure, rates would become effective
in late December 2007. The outcome of the proceeding cannot be ascertained at this time. In an
unrelated action, on April 30, 2007 the NYPSC adopted a generic order finding that energy
efficiency and conservation programs can create significant cost savings for customers. The
order further states that existing rate designs still may discourage utilities from actively
promoting energy efficiency. To address these disincentives, the order directs utilities,
including Distribution Corporation, to develop proposals for true-up based delivery service revenue
decoupling mechanisms, among other things. Distribution Corporation believes that the conservation
initiative and revenue decoupling mechanism submitted with its rate case is generally consistent
with the requirements of the April 30, 2007 directive.
Pennsylvania Jurisdiction
On June 8, 2006, the NTSB issued safety recommendations to Distribution Corporation, the PaPUC
and certain other parties as a result of an investigation of a natural gas explosion that occurred
on Distribution Corporations system in Dubois, Pennsylvania in August 2004. The explosion
destroyed a residence, resulting in the death of two people who lived there, and damaged a number
of other houses in the immediate vicinity.
The NTSB and Distribution Corporation differ in their assessment of the probable cause of the
explosion. The NTSB determined that the probable cause was the fracture of a defective butt-fusion
joint which had joined two sections of plastic pipe, and the failure of Distribution Corporation
to have an adequate program to inspect butt-fusion joints and replace those joints not meeting its
inspection criteria. Based on the report of its third-party plastic pipe expert and other relevant
evidence, Distribution Corporation believes that the probable cause was the improper excavation and
backfill operations of a third party that had worked in the vicinity of Distribution Corporations
pipeline. The NTSB has noted Distribution Corporations disagreement with the NTSBs finding of
probable cause and has forwarded to its pipeline staff the information provided by Distribution
Corporation.
-36-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
The NTSBs safety recommendations to Distribution Corporation involved revisions to its
butt-fusion procedures for joining plastic pipe, and revisions to its procedures for qualifying
personnel who perform plastic fusions. Although not required by law to do so, Distribution
Corporation implemented those recommendations. In December 2006, the NTSB classified its
recommendations as closed after determining that Distribution Corporation took acceptable action
with respect to the recommendations.
The NTSBs recommendation to the PaPUC was to require an analysis of the integrity of
butt-fusion joints in Distribution Corporations system and replacement of those joints that are
determined to have unacceptable characteristics. Distribution Corporation is working cooperatively
with the Staff of the PaPUC to permit the PaPUC to undertake the analysis recommended by the NTSB.
Specifically, Distribution has done the following, in agreement with the PaPUC Staff:
|
(i) |
|
Distribution Corporation uncovered a limited number of butt-fusions at two
locations designated by the PaPUC Staff; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
Commencing July 6, 2006, Distribution Corporation has uncovered additional
butt- fusions throughout its Pennsylvania service area as it has uncovered
facilities for other purposes; when a butt-fusion has been uncovered, Distribution
Corporation has notified the designated PaPUC Staff representative to permit
inspection of the quality of the fusion. Distribution Corporation has removed a number of fusions for
further evaluation. |
Distribution Corporation met with the PaPUC Staff in August 2006 to review findings to date
and to discuss further procedures to facilitate the analysis. Distribution Corporation and the
PaPUC Staff agreed to submit several of the butt-fusion specimens removed during the inspection
process to an independent testing laboratory to assess the integrity of the fusions (and to provide
an evaluation of the sampling procedure employed). Distribution Corporation and the PaPUC Staff
have agreed upon procedures to test the butt-fusion specimens. Distribution Corporation
anticipates that it will continue to meet with the PaPUC Staff to review findings pertaining to
this matter and address any integrity concerns that may be identified.* At this time, Distribution
Corporation is unable to predict the outcome of the analysis or of any negotiations or proceedings
that may result from it. Distribution Corporations response to the actions of the PaPUC will
depend on its assessment of the validity of the PaPUCs analysis and conclusions.
Without admitting liability, Distribution Corporation has settled all significant third-party
claims against it related to the explosion. Distribution Corporation has been committed to
providing safe and reliable service throughout its service territory and firmly believes, based on
information presently known, that its system continues to be safe and reliable. According to the
Plastics Pipe Institute, plastic pipe today accounts for over 90% of the pipe installed for the
natural gas distribution industry in the United States and Canada. Distribution Corporation, along
with many other natural gas utilities operating in the United States, has relied extensively upon
the use of plastic pipe in its natural gas distribution system since the 1970s.
Pipeline and Storage
On April 7, 2006, the NYPSC, PaPUC and the Pennsylvania Office of Consumer Advocate filed a
complaint and a motion for summary disposition against Supply Corporation with FERC under Sections
5(a) and 13 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA). The complainants alleged that Supply Corporations rates
were unjust and unreasonable, that Supply Corporation was permitted to retain more gas from
shippers than is necessary for fuel and loss, and that Supply Corporation may not have the
authority to make sales of gas retained from shippers. The settlement of this complaint was
approved by FERC during the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as described below.
After considerable motion practice, discovery and negotiation, Supply Corporation filed on
November 17, 2006 a motion asking FERC to approve an uncontested settlement of all the issues
raised or which could have been raised in the proceeding. The terms of that proposed settlement
were detailed in the Rate and Regulatory Matters section under MD&A in the Companys Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006.
-37-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
On December 20, 2006, the Administrative Law Judge certified the settlement to FERC, and on
February 9, 2007, FERC issued an order approving the settlement. No parties sought rehearing or
challenged the settlement in court, so the settlement is now final and unappealable. In accordance
with the terms of the settlement, tariff sheets implementing the settlement have been filed at and
accepted by FERC, effective April 1, 2007, and refunds for the four months ended March 31, 2007
will be made as credits on bills for services performed by Supply Corporation during April 2007.
Accounting entries were made during the quarter ended March 31, 2007 implementing various portions
of the settlement that, upon its final approval, became effective as of December 1, 2006. Refer to
the Results of Operations section above for further discussion of the settlements impact on
current quarter and year-to-date earnings.
Empire currently does not have a rate case on file with the NYPSC. Management will continue
to monitor its financial position in the New York jurisdiction to determine the necessity of filing
a rate case in the future.
Among the issues resolved in connection with Empires FERC application to build the Empire
Connector are the rates and terms of service that would become applicable to all of Empires
business, effective upon Empire constructing and placing its new facilities into service (currently
targeted for November 2008). At that time, Empire would be designated an interstate pipeline and become
subject to FERC regulation.*
FERC issued on December 21, 2006 an order granting a Certificate of Public Convenience and
Necessity authorizing the construction and operation of the Empire Connector and various other
related pipeline projects by other unaffiliated companies. The Empire Certificate contains various
environmental and other conditions. Empire has accepted that Certificate and has also filed a
request for clarification (or, in the alternative, rehearing) of limited aspects of the December
21, 2006 order. Additional environmental permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and state
environmental agencies will also be required.* Empire has also sought from six counties in upstate
New York sales tax exemptions and temporary partial property tax abatements necessary to enable
the Empire Connector to generate a fair return, in light of construction costs which are expected
to exceed the costs anticipated in Empires 2005 application to build this project.* In all six of
these counties, Empire and the relevant government authority have negotiated an acceptable
resolution, and the governmental authority has publicly issued a resolution urging final approval,
which the Company expects will happen.* However, at this time Empire has not actually received
those tax exemptions and abatements, does not have all the environmental permits necessary for
construction, and has not acquired all the land rights necessary for the project. The Company
expects to make a final decision by about May 31, 2007 on whether it will build these facilities
and place them in service by November 2008.*
Environmental Matters
The Company is subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to
the protection of the environment. The Company has established procedures for the ongoing
evaluation of its operations to identify potential environmental exposures and comply with
regulatory policies and procedures. It is the Companys policy to accrue estimated environmental
clean-up costs (investigation and remediation) when such amounts can reasonably be estimated and it
is probable that the Company will be required to incur such costs.
The Company received, in 1998 and again in October 1999, notice that the NYDEC believes the
Company is responsible for contamination discovered at a former manufactured gas plant site in New
York for which the Company had not been named as a potentially responsible party. In February
2007, the NYDEC identified the Company as a potentially responsible party for the site and issued
a proposed remedial action plan. The NYDEC estimated clean-up costs under its proposed remedy to
be $8.9 million if implemented. Although the Company commented to the NYDEC that the proposed
remedial action plan contained a number of material errors, omissions and procedural defects, the
NYDEC, in a March 2007 Record of Decision, selected the remedy it had previously proposed. The
Company has not incurred any clean-up costs at this site. The Company expects to enter
negotiations with the NYDEC regarding this site and anticipates that negotiations will extend into
2008.*
-38-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
At March 31, 2007, the Company has estimated its remaining clean-up costs related to former
manufactured gas plant sites and third party waste disposal sites will be in the range of $12.5
million to $16.1 million.* The minimum estimated liability of $12.5 million has been recorded on
the Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2007. The Company expects to recover its
environmental clean-up costs from a combination of rate recovery and insurance proceeds.*
The Company is currently not aware of any material additional exposure to environmental
liabilities. However, changes in environmental regulations or other factors could adversely
impact the Company.*
New Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by
prescribing a minimum probability threshold that a tax position must meet before a financial
statement benefit is recognized. The minimum threshold is defined in FIN 48 as a tax position that
is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority,
including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits
of the position. The cumulative
effect of applying FIN 48 at adoption, if any, is to be reported as an adjustment to opening
retained earnings for the year of adoption. FIN 48 is effective for the first quarter of the
Companys 2008 fiscal year. The Company is currently assessing the potential effect of FIN 48 on
its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157. SFAS 157 provides guidance for using fair value
to measure assets and liabilities. The pronouncement serves to clarify the extent to which
companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value, the information used to measure fair value,
and the effect that fair-value measurements have on earnings. The Company is currently evaluating
the impact that the adoption of SFAS 157 will have on its consolidated financial statements. SFAS
157 is to be applied whenever another standard requires or allows assets or liabilities to be
measured at fair value. The pronouncement is effective as of the Companys first quarter of fiscal
2009.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 158, an amendment of SFAS 87, SFAS 88, SFAS 106, and
SFAS 132R. SFAS 158 requires that companies recognize a net liability or asset to report the
underfunded or overfunded status of their defined benefit pension and other post-retirement benefit
plans on their balance sheets, as well as recognize changes in the funded status of a defined
benefit post-retirement plan in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income.
The pronouncement also specifies that a plans assets and obligations that determine its funded
status be measured as of the end of Companys fiscal year, with limited exceptions. The Company is
required to recognize the funded status of its benefit plans and the disclosure requirements of
SFAS 158 by the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007. The requirement to measure the plan assets and
benefit obligations as of the Companys fiscal year-end date will be adopted by the Company by the
end of fiscal 2009. If the Company recognized the funded status of its pension and post-retirement
benefit plans at September 30, 2006, the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet would reflect a
liability of $232.5 million instead of the prepaid pension and post-retirement costs of $64.1
million and pension and post-retirement liabilities of $32.9 million that were presented on the
balance sheet at September 30, 2006. The Company expects that it will record a regulatory asset
for the majority of this liability with the remainder reflected in accumulated other comprehensive
income. The Company will recalculate the funded status of its pension and post-retirement benefit
plans during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007. The difference between what the Company currently
records on its Consolidated Balance Sheet for its pension and post-retirement benefit obligations
and what it will be required to record under SFAS 158 is due to certain unrecognized actuarial
gains and losses and unrecognized prior service costs for both the pension and other
post-retirement benefit plans as well as an unrecognized transition obligation for the other
post-retirement benefit plan. These amounts are not required to be recorded on the Companys
Consolidated Balance Sheet under the current accounting standards, but were instead amortized over
a period of time.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159. SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure
many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not otherwise required to
be measured at fair value under GAAP. A company that elects the fair value option for an eligible
item will be
-39-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Cont.)
required to recognize in current earnings any changes in that items fair value in reporting
periods subsequent to the date of adoption. SFAS 159 is effective as of the Companys first
quarter of fiscal 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption
of SFAS 159 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
Safe Harbor for Forward-Looking Statements
The Company is including the following cautionary statement in this Form 10-Q to make
applicable and take advantage of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 for any forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, the Company.
Forward-looking statements include statements concerning plans, objectives, goals, projections,
strategies, future events or performance, and underlying assumptions and other statements which are
other than statements of historical facts. From time to time, the Company may publish or otherwise
make available forward-looking statements of this nature. All such subsequent forward-looking
statements, whether written or oral and whether made by or on behalf of the Company, are also
expressly qualified by these cautionary statements. Certain statements contained in this report,
including, without limitation, those which are
designated with an asterisk (*) and those which are identified by the use of the words
anticipates, estimates, expects, intends, plans, predicts, projects, and similar
expressions, are forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995 and accordingly involve risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results
or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. The
forward-looking statements contained herein are based on various assumptions, many of which are
based, in turn, upon further assumptions. The Companys expectations, beliefs and projections are
expressed in good faith and are believed by the Company to have a reasonable basis, including,
without limitation, managements examination of historical operating trends, data contained in the
Companys records and other data available from third parties, but there can be no assurance that
managements expectations, beliefs or projections will result or be achieved or accomplished. In
addition to other factors and matters discussed elsewhere herein, the following are important
factors that, in the view of the Company, could cause actual results to differ materially from
those discussed in the forward-looking statements:
1. |
|
Changes in laws and regulations to which the Company is subject, including changes in tax,
environmental, safety and employment laws and regulations; |
|
2. |
|
Changes in economic conditions, including economic disruptions caused by terrorist
activities, acts of war or major accidents; |
|
3. |
|
Changes in demographic patterns and weather conditions, including the occurrence of severe
weather such as hurricanes; |
|
4. |
|
Changes in the availability and/or price of natural gas or oil and the effect of such
changes on the accounting treatment or valuation of derivative financial instruments or the
Companys natural gas and oil reserves; |
|
5. |
|
Impairments under the SECs full cost ceiling test for natural gas and oil reserves; |
|
6. |
|
Changes in the availability and/or price of derivative financial instruments; |
|
7. |
|
Changes in the price differentials between various types of oil; |
|
8. |
|
Inability to obtain new customers or retain existing ones; |
|
9. |
|
Significant changes in competitive factors affecting the Company; |
|
10. |
|
Governmental/regulatory actions, initiatives and proceedings, including those involving
acquisitions, financings, rate cases (which address, among other things, allowed rates of
return, rate design and retained gas), affiliate relationships, industry structure, franchise
renewal, and environmental/safety requirements; |
-40-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
(Concl.)
11. |
|
Unanticipated impacts of restructuring initiatives in the natural gas and electric
industries; |
|
12. |
|
Significant changes from expectations in actual capital expenditures and operating expenses
and unanticipated project delays or changes in project costs or plans, including changes in
the plans of the sponsors of the proposed Millennium Pipeline with respect to that project,
and the ability to obtain necessary environmental permits; |
|
13. |
|
The nature and projected profitability of pending and potential projects and other
investments; |
|
14. |
|
Occurrences affecting the Companys ability to obtain funds from operations or from issuances
of debt or equity securities to finance needed capital expenditures and other investments,
including any downgrades in the Companys credit ratings; |
|
15. |
|
Uncertainty of oil and gas reserve estimates; |
|
16. |
|
Ability to successfully identify and finance acquisitions or other investments and ability to
operate and integrate existing and any subsequently acquired business or properties; |
|
17. |
|
Ability to successfully identify, drill for and produce economically viable natural gas and
oil reserves; |
|
18. |
|
Significant changes from expectations in the Companys actual production levels for natural
gas or oil; |
|
19. |
|
Regarding foreign operations, changes in trade and monetary policies, inflation and exchange
rates, taxes, operating conditions, laws and regulations related to foreign operations, and
political and governmental changes; |
|
20. |
|
Significant changes in tax rates or policies or in rates of inflation or interest; |
|
21. |
|
Significant changes in the Companys relationship with its employees or contractors and the
potential adverse effects if labor disputes, grievances or shortages were to occur; |
|
22. |
|
Changes in accounting principles or the application of such principles to the Company; |
|
23. |
|
The cost and effects of legal and administrative claims against the Company; |
|
24. |
|
Changes in actuarial assumptions and the return on assets with respect to the Companys
retirement plan and post-retirement benefit plans; |
|
25. |
|
Increasing health care costs and the resulting effect on health insurance premiums and on the
obligation to provide post-retirement benefits; or |
|
26. |
|
Increasing costs of insurance, changes in coverage and the ability to obtain insurance. |
The Company disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect
events or circumstances after the date hereof.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Refer to the Market Risk Sensitive Instruments section in Item 2 MD&A.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The term disclosure controls and procedures is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act. These rules refer to the controls and other procedures of a company that
are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the
reports that it files or submits
-41-
Item 4. Controls and Procedures (Concl.)
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without
limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed is
accumulated and communicated to the companys management, including its principal executive and
principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. The Companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures
as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Companys
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2007.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the quarter ended March 31, 2007 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
In an action instituted in the New York State Supreme Court, Kings County on February 18, 2003
against Distribution Corporation and Paul J. Hissin, an unaffiliated third party, plaintiff Donna
Fordham-Coleman, as administratrix of the estate of Velma Arlene Fordham, alleges that Distribution
Corporations denial of natural gas service in November 2000 to the plaintiffs decedent, Velma
Arlene Fordham, caused the decedents death in February 2001. The plaintiff sought damages for
wrongful death and pain and suffering, plus punitive damages. Distribution Corporation denied
plaintiffs material allegations, asserted seven affirmative defenses and asserted a cross-claim
against the co-defendant. Distribution Corporation believes, and has vigorously asserted, that
plaintiffs allegations lack merit. The court changed venue of the action to New York State Supreme
Court, Erie County. Discovery closed in October 2005, and Distribution Corporation filed a motion
for summary judgment in November 2005. In February 2006, the court granted Distribution
Corporations motion for summary judgment to dismiss plaintiffs claims for wrongful death and
punitive damages. The court denied Distribution Corporations motion for summary judgment to
dismiss plaintiffs negligence claim seeking recovery for conscious pain and suffering. In March
2006, the plaintiff appealed the courts dismissal of the wrongful death and punitive damages
claims, and Distribution Corporation appealed the courts denial of its motion to dismiss the
negligence claim for pain and suffering. In April 2007, the Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial
Department, of the New York State Supreme Court reinstated the plaintiffs wrongful death and
punitive damages claims and denied Distribution Corporations appeal. A trial date is scheduled
for October 15, 2007.
On April 7, 2006, the NYPSC, PaPUC and Pennsylvania Office of Consumer Advocate filed a
complaint and a motion for summary disposition against Supply Corporation with FERC under Sections
5(a) and 13 of the Natural Gas Act. On June 23, 2006, FERC denied the complainants motion for
summary disposition, and on February 9, 2007, FERC issued an order approving the settlement of the
complaint. For a discussion of the settlement, refer to Part I, Item 2 MD&A of this report under
the heading Other Matters Rate and Regulatory Matters.
On June 8, 2006, the NTSB issued safety recommendations to Distribution Corporation, the PaPUC
and certain others as a result of its investigation of a natural gas explosion that occurred on
Distribution Corporations system in Dubois, Pennsylvania in August 2004. For a discussion of this
matter, refer to Part I, Item 2 MD&A of this report under the heading Other Matters Rate and
Regulatory Matters.
The Company believes, based on the information presently known, that the ultimate resolution
of the above matters will not be material to the consolidated financial condition, results of
operations, or cash flow of the Company.* No assurances can be given, however, as to the ultimate
outcome of these matters, and it is possible that the outcome could be material to results of
operations or cash flow for a particular quarter or annual period.*
-42-
Item 1. Legal Proceedings (Concl.)
For a discussion of various environmental and other matters, refer to Part I, Item 1 at Note 4
Commitments and Contingencies, and Part I, Item 2 MD&A of this report under the heading Other
Matters Environmental Matters.
In addition to the matters disclosed above, the Company is involved in other litigation and
regulatory matters arising in the normal course of business. These other matters may include, for
example, negligence claims and tax, regulatory or other governmental audits, inspections,
investigations or other proceedings. These matters may involve state and federal taxes, safety,
compliance with regulations, rate base, cost of service, and purchased gas cost issues, among other
things. While these normal-course matters could have a material effect on earnings and cash flows
in the quarterly and annual period in which they are resolved, they are not expected to change
materially the Companys
present liquidity position, nor to have a material adverse effect on the financial condition
of the Company.*
Item 1A. Risk Factors
For a complete discussion of risk factors, refer to Risk Factors in Item 1A of the Companys
2006 Form 10-K, as amended by the discussion in Item 1A of the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended December 31, 2006. There have been no subsequent material changes to that disclosure.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
On January 2, 2007, the Company issued a total of 2,100 unregistered shares of Company common
stock to the seven non-employee directors of the Company then serving on the Board of Directors,
300 shares to each such director. On February 23, 2007, the Company issued 146 unregistered shares
of Company common stock to Stephen E. Ewing, who was elected to the Board as a non-employee
director of the Company at the Companys Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on February 15, 2007.
All of these unregistered shares were issued as partial consideration for the directors services
during the quarter ended March 31, 2007, pursuant to the Companys Retainer Policy for Non-Employee
Directors. These transactions were exempt from registration by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
of 1933 as transactions not involving a public offering.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Maximum Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
of Shares that May |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly |
|
Yet Be Purchased |
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
Announced Share |
|
Under Share |
|
|
Shares |
|
Average Price Paid |
|
Repurchase Plans |
|
Repurchase Plans |
Period |
|
Purchased(a) |
|
per Share |
|
or Programs |
|
or Programs (b) |
Jan. 1 - 31, 2007 |
|
|
41,369 |
|
|
$ |
38.87 |
|
|
|
11,400 |
|
|
|
4,278,122 |
|
Feb. 1 - 28, 2007 |
|
|
183,202 |
|
|
$ |
42.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,278,122 |
|
Mar. 1 - 31, 2007 |
|
|
24,718 |
|
|
$ |
41.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,278,122 |
|
Total |
|
|
249,289 |
|
|
$ |
41.94 |
|
|
|
11,400 |
|
|
|
4,278,122 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents (i) shares of common stock of the Company purchased on the open market
with Company matching contributions for the accounts of participants in the Companys 401(k)
plans, (ii) shares of common stock of the Company tendered to the Company by holders of stock
options or shares of restricted stock for the payment of option exercise prices or applicable
withholding taxes, and (iii) shares of common stock of the Company purchased on the open
market pursuant to the Companys publicly announced share repurchase program. Shares
purchased other than through a publicly announced share repurchase program totaled 29,969 in
January 2007, 183,202 in February 2007 and 24,718 in March 2007 (a three month total of
237,889). Of those shares, 26,095 were purchased for the Companys 401(k) plans and 211,794
were purchased as a result of shares tendered to the Company by holders of stock options or
shares of restricted stock. |
|
(b) |
|
On December 8, 2005, the Companys Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of
up to eight million shares of the Companys common stock. Repurchases may be made from time
to time in the open market or through private transactions. |
-43-
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of National Fuel Gas Company was held on February 15, 2007.
At that meeting, the shareholders elected directors, appointed an independent registered public
accounting firm, approved the Annual At Risk Compensation Incentive Program, approved amendments to
the 1997 Award and Option Plan, and rejected a shareholder proposal to reduce the compensation of
the Companys non-employee directors.
The total votes were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Withheld |
(i |
) |
|
Election of directors to
serve for a three-year term: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Philip C. Ackerman |
|
|
71,748,527 |
|
|
|
1,932,966 |
|
|
|
|
- Craig G. Matthews |
|
|
72,203,373 |
|
|
|
1,478,120 |
|
|
|
|
- Richard G. Reiten |
|
|
72,087,456 |
|
|
|
1,594,037 |
|
|
|
|
- David F. Smith |
|
|
71,842,593 |
|
|
|
1,838,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Election of directors to serve for a two-year term: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Stephen E. Ewing |
|
|
72,165,280 |
|
|
|
1,516,213 |
|
Other directors whose term of office continued after the meeting:
Term expiring in 2008: Robert T. Brady, Rolland E. Kidder, and John F. Riordan.
Term expiring in 2009: R. Don Cash and George L. Mazanec.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broker |
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
Non- Votes |
(ii) |
|
Appointment of
PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP as independent
registered public
accounting firm |
|
|
72,822,424 |
|
|
|
520,972 |
|
|
|
338,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(iii) |
|
Approval of the Annual
At Risk Compensation
Incentive Program |
|
|
68,787,527 |
|
|
|
4,005,347 |
|
|
|
888,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(iv) |
|
Approval of Amendments
to the 1997 Award and
Option Plan |
|
|
49,009,932 |
|
|
|
8,413,892 |
|
|
|
931,326 |
|
|
|
15,326,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(v) |
|
Adoption of shareholder
proposal to reduce the
compensation of non-
employee directors |
|
|
4,344,960 |
|
|
|
52,189,890 |
|
|
|
1,820,300 |
|
|
|
15,326,343 |
|
-44-
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
3(ii)
|
|
By-Laws: |
·
|
|
National Fuel Gas Company By-Laws as amended February 15, 2007,
effective April 1, 2007 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
3, Form 8-K dated February 21, 2007). |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
National Fuel Gas Company 2007 Annual At Risk Compensation
Incentive Program. |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
National Fuel Gas Company 1997 Award and Option Plan, as amended
and restated as of February 15, 2007. |
|
|
|
12
|
|
Statements regarding Computation of Ratios: |
|
|
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges for the Twelve Months Ended March
31, 2007 and the Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2002 through 2006. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Written statements of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Written statements of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
32
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
|
|
|
99
|
|
National Fuel Gas Company Consolidated Statement of Income for
the Twelve Months Ended March 31, 2007 and 2006. |
-45-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NATIONAL FUEL GAS COMPANY
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ R. J. Tanski
R. J. Tanski
Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ K. M. Camiolo
K. M. Camiolo
Controller and Principal Accounting Officer
|
|
|
Date: May 8, 2007
-46-