10-K
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
Commission File
Number: 1-14094
Meadowbrook Insurance Group,
Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Michigan
|
|
38-2626206
|
(State of
Incorporation)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification
No.)
|
|
|
|
26255 American Drive, Southfield, MI
|
|
48034-6112
|
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(248) 358-1100
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Exchange on Which Registered
|
|
Common Stock, $.01 par value per share
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer o
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common
stock held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price
at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and
asked price of such common equity, as of June 30, 2008 was
$196,211,470. As of March 4, 2009, there were
57,447,707 shares of the Companys common stock
($.01 par value) outstanding.
Documents
Incorporated by Reference
Certain portions of the Registrants Proxy Statement for
the 2009 Annual Shareholders Meeting scheduled for
May 14, 2009 are incorporated by reference into
Part III of this report.
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
PART I
The
Company
Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. (We,
Our, Us, or Meadowbrook)
(NYSE: MIG) is a holding company organized as a Michigan
corporation in 1985. Meadowbrook was founded in 1955 as
Meadowbrook Insurance Agency and was subsequently incorporated
in Michigan in 1965. Our principal executive offices are located
at 26255 American Drive, Southfield, Michigan
48034-5178
(telephone number:
(248) 358-1100).
We serve as a holding company for our wholly owned subsidiary
Star Insurance Company (Star), and Stars
wholly owned subsidiaries, Savers Property and Casualty
Insurance Company (Savers), Williamsburg National
Insurance Company (Williamsburg), and Ameritrust
Insurance Corporation (Ameritrust), as well as,
American Indemnity Insurance Company, Ltd. (American
Indemnity) and Preferred Insurance Company, Ltd.
(PICL). We also serve as a holding company for
Meadowbrook, Inc. (Meadowbrook), Crest Financial
Corporation, and their respective subsidiaries. In addition, as
described further below, we also serve as a holding company for
ProCentury Corporation (ProCentury) and its wholly
owned subsidiaries. ProCenturys wholly owned subsidiaries
consist of Century Surety Company (Century) and its
wholly owned subsidiary ProCentury Insurance Company
(PIC). In addition, ProCentury Risk Partners
Insurance Co. (Propic) is a wholly owned subsidiary
of ProCentury.
Star, Savers, Williamsburg, Ameritrust, Century, and PIC are
collectively referred to as the Insurance Company Subsidiaries.
Pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation
Number (FIN) 46(R), we do not consolidate our
subsidiaries, Meadowbrook Capital Trust I and II (the
Trusts), as they are not variable interest entities
and we are not the primary beneficiary of the Trusts. Our
consolidated financial statements, however, include the equity
earnings of the Trusts. In addition and in accordance with
FIN 46(R), we do not consolidate our subsidiary American
Indemnity. While we and our subsidiary Star are the common
shareholders, neither are the primary beneficiaries of American
Indemnity. Our consolidated financial statements, however,
include the equity earnings of American Indemnity.
ProCentury
Merger
On February 20, 2008, Meadowbrook and ProCentury
Corporation entered into a merger agreement (the Merger
Agreement), pursuant to which ProCentury would become a
wholly owned subsidiary of Meadowbrook (the Merger).
Following the close of business on July 31, 2008, the
Merger of Meadowbrook and ProCentury was completed. Under the
terms of the Merger Agreement, ProCentury shareholders were
entitled to receive, for each ProCentury common share, either
$20.00 in cash or Meadowbrook common stock based on a 2.50
exchange ratio, subject to adjustment as described within the
Merger Agreement. In accordance with the Merger Agreement, the
stock price used in determining the final cash and share
consideration portion of the purchase price was based on the
volume-weighted average sales price of a share of Meadowbrook
common stock for the
30-day
trading period ending on the sixth trading day before the
completion of the Merger, or $5.7326. Based upon the final
proration, the total purchase price was $227.2 million, of
which $99.1 million consisted of cash, $122.7 million
in newly issued Meadowbrook common stock, and approximately
$5.4 million in transaction related expenses. The total
number of new common shares issued for purposes of the stock
portion of the purchase price was 21.1 million shares.
Refer to Note 2 ProCentury Merger in the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
discussion of the Merger and a pro forma presentation of
financial results for the combined company.
The combined company maintained the Meadowbrook Insurance Group,
Inc. name and the New York Stock Exchange symbol of
MIG.
2
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
ProCentury is a specialty insurance company, which primarily
underwrites general liability, commercial property,
environmental, garage keepers, commercial multi-peril,
commercial auto, surety, and marine insurance primarily in the
excess and surplus lines, or non-admitted, market
through a select group of general agents. The excess and surplus
lines market provides insurance coverage for customers with
hard-to-place risks that standard or admitted insurers typically
choose not to insure. For further detail relating to ProCentury
and its subsidiaries, refer to the section on Insurance Company
Programs and Insurance Company Subsidiaries below.
Five months of earnings of ProCentury are included in our
financial statements as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
The Merger is expected to expand and complement our specialty
lines capabilities with the addition of ProCenturys
insurance professionals and product expertise in the excess and
surplus lines market. We believe there are significant
profitable revenue growth opportunities, as well as cost savings
opportunities. Since the completion of the Merger, we have been
executing on numerous revenue enhancement opportunities and
leveraging the infrastructure as summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
launching a new wholesale relationship in the Midwest;
|
|
|
|
fulfilling a surplus lines market need for an existing
workers compensation partner in New England;
|
|
|
|
expanding ProCentury products into states through our existing
admitted market capability;
|
|
|
|
capitalizing on enhanced business development capabilities by
having a more comprehensive risk management offering and shared
marketing platform;
|
|
|
|
reorganization and development of claims expertise in our
various offices;
|
|
|
|
generation of reinsurance cost savings due to the increased size
and diversity of the merged companies; and
|
|
|
|
providing a workers compensation market to select
qualified ProCentury wholesalers.
|
Other
Significant Acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
In April 2007, we acquired the business of U.S. Specialty
Underwriters, Inc. (USSU). USSU is a specialty
program manager that produces fee based income by underwriting
targeted classes within excess workers compensation
coverage for a select group of insurance companies.
|
|
|
|
In November 2005, we acquired the business of
Insurance & Benefit Consultants (IBC) of
Sarasota, Florida. IBC is a retail and wholesale agency
specializing in group and individual health insurance products
and personal financial planning services.
|
|
|
|
In August 1999, we acquired the assets of TPA Associates, Inc.,
all the outstanding stock of TPA Insurance Agency, Inc., and
Preferred Insurance Agency, Inc., and approximately ninety-four
percent of the outstanding stock of PICL (collectively,
TPA). TPA is a program-oriented risk management
company that provides risk management services to self-insured
clients, manages alternative risk management programs, and
performs underwriting, policy issuance and loss control services
for unaffiliated insurance companies. In January 2002, we
purchased the remaining six percent minority interest of PICL.
PICL was dissolved effective January 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
In July 1998, we acquired Florida Preferred Administrators, Inc.
(Florida Preferred), a third party administrator and
Ameritrust Insurance Corporation (Ameritrust). In
December 2002, Ameritrust became a wholly owned subsidiary of
Star. Florida Preferred provides a broad range of risk
management services for Ameritrust and other third parties.
|
|
|
|
In July 1997, we acquired Crest Financial Corporation
(Crest), a California-based holding company, which
formerly owned Williamsburg National Insurance Company
(Williamsburg). Crest provides
|
3
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
risk management services primarily to Williamsburg. On
December 31, 1999, Williamsburg became a wholly owned
subsidiary of Star.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In July 1990, we acquired Savers Property and Casualty Insurance
Company (Savers).
|
Employees
At March 4, 2009, we employed approximately 921 associates
to service our clients and provide management services to our
Insurance Company Subsidiaries as described below. We believe we
have good relationships with our associates.
Overview
We are a specialty insurance underwriter and insurance
administration services company, that serves the needs of
underserved market segments that value service and specialized
knowledge. We market and underwrite specialty property and
casualty insurance products on both an admitted and non-admitted
basis through a broad and diverse network of independent retail,
wholesale program administrators and general agents. We
primarily focus on niche or specialty program business and risk
management solutions for agents, professional and trade
associations, pools, trusts, and small to medium-sized insureds.
These solutions include specialty program underwriting; excess
and surplus lines insurance products; alternative risk transfer
solutions, agency operations, and insurance administration
services.
Our programs are diversified geographically, by class and line
of business, type of insured and distribution. Within the
workers compensation line of business, we have a regional
focus in New England, Florida, and Nevada. Within the commercial
auto and commercial multiple peril line of business, we have a
regional focus in the Southeast and California. Within the
general liability line of business we have a focus in Texas. Our
fee-for-service business is managed on a regional basis with an
emphasis in the Midwest, New England, and southeastern regions,
as well as the self-insured market in Nevada. Our corporate
strategy emphasizes a regional focus and diverse sources of
revenue between underwritten premiums, service fee revenue, and
commissions. This allows us to leverage fixed costs over a
larger revenue base and take advantage of new opportunities.
We were founded in 1955 as a retail insurance agency. We earn
commission revenue through the operation of our retail property
and casualty insurance agencies, located in Michigan,
California, and Florida.
For over thirty years, we have specialized in providing full
service risk management and insurance solutions for our clients.
By forming risk-sharing partnerships, we align our financial
objectives with our clients. By utilizing our products and
services, small to medium-sized client groups gain access to
more sophisticated risk management techniques previously
available only to larger corporations. This enables our clients
to control insurance costs and achieve more predictable
underwriting results.
Based upon the particular risk management goals of our clients,
market conditions and our assessment of the opportunity for
operating profit, we offer solutions on a managed basis, a
risk-sharing basis, or a fully-insured basis, in response to a
specific market opportunity. In a managed program, we earn
service fee revenue by providing certain operational functions
and other services to a clients risk-bearing entity, but
generally do not share in the operating results. In a
risk-sharing program, we share the operating results with the
client through a reinsurance agreement with a captive or
rent-a-captive.
The captive and
rent-a-captive
structures are licensed reinsurance companies and are accounted
for under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 113, Accounting
and Reporting for Reinsurance of Short-Duration and
Long-Duration Contracts. In risk-sharing programs, we
derive revenue from net earned premiums, fee-for-service revenue
and commissions, and investment income. In addition, we may
benefit from the fees our risk management subsidiary earns for
services we perform on behalf of our Insurance Company
Subsidiaries. These fees are eliminated upon consolidation.
However, the fees associated with the captives portion of
the program
4
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
are reimbursed through a ceding commission. For a fully-insured
program, we provide insurance products without a risk-bearing
mechanism and derive revenue from net earned premiums and
investment income.
Objective
and Strategy
Our corporate objective is to generate predictable earnings
across the market cycle, with a long term targeted return on
average equity of 12%-15%. Our strategy is to maximize on the
unique characteristics of our balanced business model to:
Generate profitable underwriting results from our
insurance operations;
|
|
|
|
|
Generate consistent investment income with a low-risk,
high-quality, primarily fixed income portfolio;
|
|
|
|
Leverage invested assets to equity;
|
|
|
|
Generate stable, consistent fee and commission income through
our agency and specialty insurance operations; and
|
|
|
|
Generate free cash flow from dividends from our Insurance
Company Subsidiaries and non-regulated insurance administration
services.
|
Operational
Structure
We have developed a broad range of capabilities and services in
the design, management, and servicing of our clients risk
management needs. These capabilities and services include:
|
|
|
|
|
Program and Product Design
|
|
|
|
Underwriting, Risk Selection, and Policy Issuance
|
|
|
|
Sales, Marketing, and Public Relations to Members of Groups
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance Placement
|
|
|
|
Policy Administration and Statistical Reporting
|
|
|
|
Loss Prevention and Control
|
|
|
|
Claims Administration and Handling
|
5
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
Litigation Management
|
|
|
|
Information Technology and Processing
|
|
|
|
Accounting and Actuarial Functions
|
|
|
|
General Management and Oversight of the Program
|
|
|
|
Rate and Policy Form Filing
|
Our specialty insurance operations and agency operations are
entirely supported by our full-service processing capabilities,
which provide every function necessary to a risk management
organization.
Company
Segments
Our revenues are derived from two distinct business operations:
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty insurance operations, which generate service fees, net
earned premium and investment income; and
|
|
|
|
Agency operations, which generate commission income.
|
Specialty
Insurance Operations
Our specialty insurance operations, which includes insurance
company specialty programs and fee-for-service specialty or
managed programs, focuses on specialty or niche insurance
business. Specialty insurance operations provide services and
coverages tailored to meet the specific requirements of defined
client groups and their members. These services include risk
management consulting, claims administration and handling, loss
control and prevention, and reinsurance placement, along with
various types of property and casualty insurance coverage,
including workers compensation, commercial multiple peril,
general liability, commercial auto liability, excess and surplus
lines, environmental, garage keepers, surety, legal,
professional liability, errors & omissions, inland
marine, and other lines of business, where we see a market need
and a profit potential. Insurance coverage is provided primarily
to associations or similar groups of members and to specified
classes of business of our agents. We recognize revenue related
to the services and coverages from our specialty insurance
operations within seven categories: net earned premiums,
management fees, claims fees, loss control fees, reinsurance
placement, investment income, and net realized gains (losses).
We included the results of operations related to ProCentury
within the specialty insurance operations. Therefore, our
specialty insurance operations include five months of operations
for ProCentury.
Our specialty insurance operations generated gross written
premiums of $457.7 million, $346.5 million, and
$330.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007, and 2006, respectively.
Gross written premiums include the following lines of business:
|
|
|
|
|
Workers Compensation
|
|
|
|
Commercial Multiple Peril
|
|
|
|
Commercial Automobile
|
|
|
|
General Liability
|
Errors and Omissions
Owners, Landlord and Tenant
|
|
|
|
|
Garage Keepers Liability
|
|
|
|
Employment Practices Liability
|
6
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
Medical
Real Estate Appraisers
Pharmacists
|
|
|
|
|
Marine
|
|
|
|
Product Liability
|
|
|
|
Excess Insurance and Reinsurance
|
|
|
|
Commercial Property
|
|
|
|
Surety
|
Agency
Operations
Our agency operations segment earns commission revenue through
the operation of its retail property and casualty insurance
agencies, located in Michigan, California, and Florida. These
agencies produce commercial, personal lines, life and accident
and health insurance, with more than fifty unaffiliated
insurance carriers. These agencies produce an immaterial amount
of business for our affiliated Insurance Company Subsidiaries.
Our agency operations generated commissions of
$11.1 million, $11.3 million, and $12.3 million
for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006,
respectively.
Description
of Specialty Insurance Operations
Fee-for-Service
Specialty or Managed Programs:
With a fee-for-service or managed program, we earn revenue by
providing certain operational and management functions and other
services to a clients risk-bearing entity, but generally
do not share in the operating results of the program. We believe
our fee-for-service or managed programs provide a consistent
source of revenue, as well as opportunities for revenue growth
without a proportionate increase in capital. Revenue growth may
occur through the sale of existing products to additional
members of the group, the expansion of coverages and services
provided to existing programs and the creation of programs for
new client groups.
Services for which we receive revenue from fee-for-service or
managed programs include:
|
|
|
|
|
program design and development;
|
|
|
|
underwriting;
|
|
|
|
reinsurance placement;
|
|
|
|
policy administration;
|
|
|
|
loss prevention and control;
|
|
|
|
claims administration and handling;
|
|
|
|
litigation management;
|
|
|
|
information technology and processing;
|
|
|
|
accounting functions; and
|
|
|
|
general operational functions and oversight of the program.
|
7
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
The fees we receive from these managed programs are generally
either a fixed amount or based on a percentage of premium
serviced or by claim count.
We also provide insurance management services to public entity
associations and currently provide services to public entity
pools and other insurance entities, which provide insurance
coverage for participants, including city, county, township,
villages and other quasi governmental entities in three states,
as well as other diverse industry groups.
Insurance
Company Programs:
As a specialty insurance company, we market and underwrite
specialty property and casualty insurance products on both an
admitted and non-admitted basis through a broad and diverse
network of independent retail, wholesale program administrators
and general agents. With a program-focus we
distribute our products through select independent, general
agents, and wholesale agents with either a defined geographic
specialty and / or product specialty. An example of a
geographic focus is our New England program, which distributes a
workers compensation product through a general agent in
Massachusetts. An example of a product specialty would be a book
of business that provides general liability insurance to high
tech manufacturers in the Northwest region. Another example of a
product specialty would be a garage keepers liability product
that requires specialized pricing and manuscript coverage forms.
We compensate our distribution network primarily on a flat
commission rate based upon premiums written, or other
risk-sharing mechanism such as a captive, segregated cell or
rent-a-captive.
Our specialty focus allows us to develop underwriting, services,
and product expertise for underserved market segments that value
service, specialized knowledge and other value-based
considerations. Our Insurance Company Subsidiaries include two
specialty areas, specialty programs and specialty excess and
surplus lines. With all of our specialty programs and our
specialty excess and surplus lines business we seek to combine
profitable underwriting, investment returns and efficient
capital management to deliver consistent long-term growth in
shareholder value.
Our specialty excess and surplus lines subsidiaries provide a
market for customers with hard-to-place risks that standard or
admitted insurers typically choose not to insure. In the excess
and surplus lines market, we serve businesses that are unable to
obtain coverage from standard or admitted carriers for a variety
of reasons, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the unique nature of the insured business is outside the risk
profile of standard lines carriers;
|
|
|
|
the risk associated with an insured is higher than the risk
anticipated by a standard lines carrier when it filed its rates
and forms for regulatory approval, which prevents it from
charging a premium that is thought to be appropriate for the
heightened risk;
|
|
|
|
many geographic regions are considered to be adverse or more
risky markets in which to operate due to legal, regulatory or
claims issues or because they are too remote to warrant a
marketing effort and, as a result, agents in theses areas have a
limited choice of admitted insurers; and
|
|
|
|
small agent organizations who do not generate enough premium
volume to qualify for direct relationships with standard lines
carriers.
|
We provide three broad types of insurance company programs,
including fully insured, captives and client risk-sharing
programs. With a client risk-sharing program, our Insurance
Company Subsidiaries underwrite individual primary insurance
policies for members of a group or association, or a specific
industry and then share the operating results with the client or
client group through a reinsurance agreement with a captive or
rent-a-captive.
In some instances, a captive owned by a client or client group
reinsures a portion of the risk on a quota-share basis. A
captive is an insurance company or reinsurance company, which is
formed for the purpose of insuring or reinsuring risks related
to the businesses of its shareholders or members. A
rent-a-captive
allows organizations to obtain the benefits of a captive
insurance company, without the initial costs and capital
investment required to form their own captive. This is often an
interim step utilized by
8
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
groups and associations prior to forming their own captive. As
part of its participation in a
rent-a-captive,
the client group purchases redeemable preferred stock of our
unconsolidated subsidiary. These shares entitle the client group
to participate in profits and losses of the program through a
dividend or additional capital contribution. Dividends or
additional capital contributions are determined and accrued on
the basis of underwriting profits or losses plus investment
income on trust accounts less costs. The captive and
rent-a-captive
structures are licensed reinsurance companies, which have a
self-sustaining integrated set of activities and assets, and are
in the reinsurance business for the purpose of providing a
return to their investors, who are the shareholders
(primary beneficiaries) of the captive company. The
primary beneficiaries have their own equity at risk, decision
making authority, and the ability to absorb losses. Therefore,
the transactions associated with the captive and
rent-a-captive
structures are accounted for under the provisions of
SFAS No. 113, Accounting and Reporting for
Reinsurance of Short-Duration and Long-Duration
Contracts.
In addition to premium revenue and investment income from our
net retained portion of the operating results, we may also be
compensated through the receipt of fees for policy issuance
services and acquisition costs, captive administration,
reinsurance placement, loss prevention services, and claims
administrative and handling services. In addition, we may
benefit from the fees our risk management subsidiary earns for
services we perform on behalf of our Insurance Company
Subsidiaries. These fees are eliminated upon consolidation.
However, the fees associated with the captives portion of
the program are reimbursed through a ceding commission. For
financial reporting purposes, ceding commissions are treated as
a reduction in underwriting expenses.
Our experience has been that the number of claims and the cost
of losses tend to be lower in risk-sharing programs than with
traditional forms of insurance. We believe that client
risk-sharing motivates participants to focus on loss prevention,
risk control measures and adherence to stricter underwriting
guidelines.
The following schematic illustrates the basic elements in many
of our client risk-sharing programs.
CAPTIVE
RISK-SHARING STRUCTURE
9
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
We account for transactions with
these risk-sharing clients as reinsurance under the provisions
of SFAS No. 113 Accounting and Reporting for
Reinsurance of Short-Duration and Long-Duration
Clients.
|
The captives shareholders, which may or may not include
the insured, and its board of directors make the decision to
form the captive or terminate the captive, based upon either
their own analysis or the analysis performed by an independent
third party consultant they hire. The shareholders of the
captive make the decision whether to invest and how much to
invest in the captive. This decision may be based upon advice
from third party consultants.
The agent of the business will make the decision to submit the
risk to the insurance company for underwriting and the
policyholders make the decision to purchase the quoted policy.
The captive administrator provides administrative services to
the captive in exchange for a fee. This fee is usually a fixed
amount, but can be a variable amount based upon premium volume,
and is negotiated on an annual basis with the captives
board of directors. Such services may include bookkeeping,
providing regulatory information, and other administrative
services. We also may provide loss prevention, claims handling,
underwriting, and other insurance services directly to certain
of our captives. However, our risk management services
subsidiary provides these services to our Insurance Company
Subsidiaries for a fee, which is eliminated upon consolidation.
The costs associated with these services are included within the
premium quoted to the policyholder.
In applying FIN 46(R)s provisions to the captive
risk-sharing structure, our variable interest in the captive is
limited to administrative fees based upon a fixed amount or a
percentage of premiums and the credit risk associated with any
reinsurance recoverables recognized.
The captives are generally capitalized with common stock and may
use preferred stock in isolated instances. The captives
variability is: (1) created based upon the experience of
their portion of business directly written through our Insurance
Company Subsidiaries and ceded to the captive on a quota share
basis; and (2) absorbed by the captives shareholders.
In general, the captives common
and/or
preferred shareholders are either the agents or producers of the
business, a sponsoring group or association, a group of
policyholders, a policyholder, or a general agent. The
captives shareholders are not related parties of ours
pursuant to either SFAS No. 57, Related Party
Disclosures, or paragraph 16 of FIN 46(R).
By design, the capital base of the captive is structured to
absorb the projected losses of the program, and the
captives shareholders bear the risk of loss. Through a
trust agreement, we protect ourselves from potential credit risk
related to reinsurance recoverables from the captive by a
collateral requirement of up to 110% of the estimated reserves
for losses and unearned premiums. In addition, we monitor the
capital adequacy and financial leverage ratios of the captive to
mitigate future credit risk.
In another variation of client risk-sharing, we establish
retrospectively rated programs for individual accounts. With
this type of program, we work with the client to develop the
appropriate self-insured retention and loss fund amount and then
help arrange for excess-of-loss reinsurance. The client
reimburses us for all claim payments within the clients
retention. We generally earn a management fee (which includes
claims and loss control fees). In most of these programs, we
also share in the operating results with the client and receive
a ceding commission in the excess-of-loss reinsurance contract
to reimburse us for expenses, including a fee for services.
In another version of client risk-sharing, the agent accepts an
upfront commission that is adjusted up or down based on
operating results of the program produced.
With a fully-insured program, we provide our insurance products
without a risk-sharing mechanism and derive revenue from net
earned premiums and investment income. Fully-insured programs
are generally developed in response to specific market
opportunities and may evolve into a risk-sharing arrangement.
10
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
Description
of Major Specialty Risk Management Services
Our risk management subsidiary provides the following services
to our fee-for-service clients and to our Insurance Company
Subsidiaries for a fee. The fees associated with services
provided to our Insurance Company Subsidiaries are eliminated
upon consolidation. The costs associated with these services are
charged to our insureds in the form of premiums.
Program and Product Design. Before
implementing a new program, we generally review:
(1) financial projections for the contemplated program,
(2) historical loss experience, (3) actuarial studies
of the underlying risks, (4) the credit worthiness of the
potential agent or client, and (5) the availability of
reinsurance. Our senior management team and associates
representing each of the risk-management disciplines work
together to design, market, and implement new programs. Our due
diligence process is structured to provide a risk assessment of
the program and how the program fits within our entity wide
business plan and risk profile.
Underwriting Risk Selection and Policy
Issuance. Through our risk management subsidiary,
we perform underwriting services for our Insurance Company
Subsidiaries that meet our corporate underwriting guidelines. We
retain ultimate underwriting authority and monitor adherence to
our corporate underwriting guidelines through periodic audits.
Our underwriting personnel help develop the proper criteria for
selecting risks, while actuarial and reinsurance personnel
evaluate and recommend the appropriate levels of rate and risk
retention. The program is then tailored according to the
requirements and qualifications of each client. With managed
programs, we may also perform underwriting services based upon
the profile of the specific program for a fee.
Claims Administration and Handling. Through
our risk management subsidiary, we provide substantially all
claims management and handling services for workers
compensation and most other lines, such as property,
professional liability, and general liability. Our claims
handling standards are set by our corporate claims department
and are monitored through self-audits, corporate claim audits,
internal controls, and other executive oversight reports. We
handle substantially all claims functions for the majority of
the programs we manage. Our involvement in claims administration
and handling provides feedback to program managers in assessing
the clients risk environment and the overall structure of
the program.
Loss Prevention and Control. Through our risk
management subsidiary, we provide loss control services, which
are designed to help clients prevent or limit the impact of
certain loss events. Through an evaluation of the clients
workplace environment, our loss control specialists assist the
client in planning and implementing a loss prevention program
and, in certain cases, provide educational and training
programs. With our managed programs, we provide these same
services for a fee based upon the profile of the specific
program.
Administration of Risk-Bearing Entities. We
generate fee revenue by assisting in the formation and
administration of risk-bearing entities for clients and agents.
Through our subsidiaries in Bermuda and Washington D.C., we
provide administrative services for certain captives
and/or
rent-a-captives.
Reinsurance Placement. Through our reinsurance
intermediary subsidiary, we earn commissions from placing
excess-of-loss reinsurance and insurance coverage with high
deductibles for insurance companies, captives, and managed
self-insured programs. Reinsurance is also placed for clients
who do not have other business relationships with us.
Sales, Marketing, and Public Relations. We
market our programs and services to associations, professional
and trade groups, local, regional and national insurance agents,
and insurance consultants. Sales and marketing efforts include
personal contact through independent agents, direct mail,
telemarketing, association publications/newsletters,
advertising, Internet-based marketing including our corporate
website (www.meadowbrook.com), and subsidiary branch/division
websites. We access or manage a range of distribution systems
and regional agency networks on a program-specific basis.
We also participate in seminars, trade and industry conventions
such as Target Markets Program Administrators Association,
American Association of Managing General Agents, American
Society of
11
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
Association Executives, Self Insurance Institute of America,
National Association of Professional Surplus Lines Offices,
Public Risk Management Association, and various individual state
independent agent associations.
In 2000, we launched our Advantage System
(Advantage). Advantage is an Internet-based business
processing system for quoting and binding workers
compensation insurance policies. In addition to reducing our
internal administrative processing costs, Advantage enhances
underwriting practices by automating risk selection criteria.
Insurance
Company Subsidiaries
Our Insurance Company Subsidiaries issue insurance policies.
Through our Insurance Company Subsidiaries, we engage in
specialty risk management programs where we market and
underwrite specialty property and casualty insurance products on
both an admitted and non-admitted basis through a broad and
diverse network of independent retail, wholesale program
administrators and general agents. Our Insurance Company
Subsidiaries primarily focus on specialty programs in which we
distribute our products through select independent, general
agents, and wholesale agents with either a defined geographic
specialty and / or product specialty. These programs
are generally designed specifically for trade groups and
associations, whose members are homogeneous in nature. Members
are typically small-to-medium sized businesses. We compensate
our distribution network primarily on a flat commission rate
based upon premiums written, or other risk-sharing mechanism
such as a captive, segregated cell or
rent-a-captive.
Through our excess and surplus lines insurance carriers, we
provide coverage for risks that either do not fit the
underwriting criteria of standard carriers with which the retail
agent has a direct relationship, or they are of a class or risk
that the standard market generally avoids since the regulated
nature of that market does not allow for customized terms or
rates. Non-standard risks can be underwritten profitably,
however, by the excess and surplus market, by using highly
specific coverage forms with terms based on individual risk
assessment, rather than the risk profile of the most desirable
members of the class. When a certain risk has been excluded from
the standard market, the retail agents need quick placement with
the excess and surplus lines market in order to maintain
coverage for the insured. As a result, the primary basis for
competition within the excess and surplus lines industry can be
focused more on service and availability rather than rate.
Our programs focus on select classes of property and casualty
business which, through our due diligence process, we believe
have demonstrated a fundamentally sound prospect for generating
underwriting profits. We occasionally do offer our programs on a
multi-state basis; but more generally, our programs operate on a
regional or state-specific basis. We maintain underwriting
authority through our regional offices based upon underwriting
guidelines set forth by our corporate underwriting department,
which we monitor through underwriting audits and a series of
executive underwriting and rate monitor reports. We seek to
avoid geographic concentration of risks that might lead to
aggregation of exposure to losses from natural or intentionally
caused catastrophic events. We also handle the majority of our
claims through our regional offices based upon standards set
forth by our corporate claims office and monitored through a
series of self-audits and corporate claims audit, internal
control audits, and executive claims monitoring reports.
American Indemnity, a Bermuda-based insurance company which
offers our clients a captive or
rent-a-captive
option, complements our Insurance Company Subsidiaries.
In addition, we may at times place risks directly with third
party insurance carriers and participate in the risk as a
reinsurance partner. Such arrangements typically generate
management fee revenue and provide a means to manage premium
leverage ratios.
Our Insurance Company Subsidiaries primarily offer workers
compensation, commercial multiple peril, general liability,
marine and other liability coverages on both an admitted and
non-admitted basis. Our Insurance Company Subsidiaries maintain
a variety of licenses in order for us to write on an admitted
and / or a non-admitted basis in all fifty states,
including the District of Columbia.
12
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
Our insurance operations are subject to various leverage tests
(e.g., premium to statutory surplus ratios), which are evaluated
by regulators and rating agencies. Our targets for gross and net
written premium to statutory surplus are 2.8 to 1.0 and 2.25 to
1.0, respectively. As of December 31, 2008, on a statutory
consolidated basis, including the insurance company subsidiaries
acquired in the ProCentury merger, gross and net premium
leverage ratios were 1.4 to 1.0 and 1.2 to 1.0, respectively.
The following table summarizes gross written premiums, net
earned premiums, and net written premiums for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005, and 2004 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Written Premium
|
|
2008
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Workers Compensation
|
|
$
|
137,503
|
|
|
|
30.04
|
%
|
|
$
|
116,717
|
|
|
|
33.69
|
%
|
|
$
|
118,794
|
|
|
|
35.90
|
%
|
|
$
|
133,732
|
|
|
|
40.26
|
%
|
|
$
|
146,982
|
|
|
|
46.89
|
%
|
Commercial Multi-Peril Liability
|
|
|
29,114
|
|
|
|
6.36
|
%
|
|
|
69,970
|
|
|
|
20.20
|
%
|
|
|
67,764
|
|
|
|
20.48
|
%
|
|
|
59,928
|
|
|
|
18.04
|
%
|
|
|
51,083
|
|
|
|
16.29
|
%
|
Commercial Multi-Peril Property
|
|
|
37,519
|
|
|
|
8.20
|
%
|
|
|
30,394
|
|
|
|
8.77
|
%
|
|
|
26,591
|
|
|
|
8.04
|
%
|
|
|
26,050
|
|
|
|
7.84
|
%
|
|
|
20,632
|
|
|
|
6.58
|
%
|
Other Liability
|
|
|
116,988
|
|
|
|
25.56
|
%
|
|
|
28,550
|
|
|
|
8.24
|
%
|
|
|
20,001
|
|
|
|
6.04
|
%
|
|
|
16,167
|
|
|
|
4.87
|
%
|
|
|
15,248
|
|
|
|
4.86
|
%
|
Other Commercial Auto Liability
|
|
|
73,952
|
|
|
|
16.16
|
%
|
|
|
61,119
|
|
|
|
17.64
|
%
|
|
|
59,308
|
|
|
|
17.92
|
%
|
|
|
59,144
|
|
|
|
17.80
|
%
|
|
|
48,070
|
|
|
|
15.33
|
%
|
All Other Lines
|
|
|
62,607
|
|
|
|
13.68
|
%
|
|
|
39,701
|
|
|
|
11.46
|
%
|
|
|
38,414
|
|
|
|
11.61
|
%
|
|
|
37,188
|
|
|
|
11.19
|
%
|
|
|
31,478
|
|
|
|
10.04
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
457,683
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
346,451
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
330,872
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
332,209
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
313,493
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Earned Premium
|
|
2008
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Workers Compensation
|
|
$
|
109,312
|
|
|
|
29.57
|
%
|
|
$
|
102,256
|
|
|
|
38.13
|
%
|
|
$
|
108,085
|
|
|
|
42.40
|
%
|
|
$
|
119,423
|
|
|
|
47.78
|
%
|
|
$
|
117,914
|
|
|
|
54.97
|
%
|
Commercial Multi-Peril Liability
|
|
|
46,326
|
|
|
|
12.53
|
%
|
|
|
50,031
|
|
|
|
18.65
|
%
|
|
|
45,192
|
|
|
|
17.73
|
%
|
|
|
38,541
|
|
|
|
15.42
|
%
|
|
|
32,018
|
|
|
|
14.93
|
%
|
Commercial Multi-Peril Property
|
|
|
31,847
|
|
|
|
8.61
|
%
|
|
|
21,018
|
|
|
|
7.84
|
%
|
|
|
17,946
|
|
|
|
7.04
|
%
|
|
|
16,288
|
|
|
|
6.52
|
%
|
|
|
11,683
|
|
|
|
5.45
|
%
|
Other Liability
|
|
|
74,470
|
|
|
|
20.14
|
%
|
|
|
15,571
|
|
|
|
5.81
|
%
|
|
|
10,433
|
|
|
|
4.09
|
%
|
|
|
8,072
|
|
|
|
3.23
|
%
|
|
|
6,416
|
|
|
|
2.99
|
%
|
Other Commercial Auto Liability
|
|
|
62,306
|
|
|
|
16.85
|
%
|
|
|
53,469
|
|
|
|
19.94
|
%
|
|
|
49,341
|
|
|
|
19.36
|
%
|
|
|
45,374
|
|
|
|
18.15
|
%
|
|
|
29,274
|
|
|
|
13.65
|
%
|
All Other Lines
|
|
|
45,460
|
|
|
|
12.30
|
%
|
|
|
25,852
|
|
|
|
9.64
|
%
|
|
|
23,923
|
|
|
|
9.38
|
%
|
|
|
22,261
|
|
|
|
8.91
|
%
|
|
|
17,188
|
|
|
|
8.01
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
369,721
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
268,197
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
254,920
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
249,959
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
214,493
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Written Premium
|
|
2008
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Workers Compensation
|
|
$
|
120,507
|
|
|
|
32.12
|
%
|
|
$
|
105,003
|
|
|
|
37.47
|
%
|
|
$
|
104,846
|
|
|
|
39.92
|
%
|
|
$
|
117,287
|
|
|
|
45.44
|
%
|
|
$
|
122,896
|
|
|
|
52.53
|
%
|
Commercial Multi-Peril Liability
|
|
|
24,690
|
|
|
|
6.58
|
%
|
|
|
52,815
|
|
|
|
18.85
|
%
|
|
|
48,737
|
|
|
|
18.55
|
%
|
|
|
42,157
|
|
|
|
16.33
|
%
|
|
|
32,872
|
|
|
|
14.05
|
%
|
Commercial Multi-Peril Property
|
|
|
30,270
|
|
|
|
8.07
|
%
|
|
|
23,465
|
|
|
|
8.37
|
%
|
|
|
18,767
|
|
|
|
7.14
|
%
|
|
|
17,713
|
|
|
|
6.86
|
%
|
|
|
13,479
|
|
|
|
5.76
|
%
|
Other Liability
|
|
|
87,760
|
|
|
|
23.39
|
%
|
|
|
18,915
|
|
|
|
6.75
|
%
|
|
|
12,384
|
|
|
|
4.71
|
%
|
|
|
8,004
|
|
|
|
3.10
|
%
|
|
|
7,568
|
|
|
|
3.23
|
%
|
Other Commercial Auto Liability
|
|
|
64,678
|
|
|
|
17.24
|
%
|
|
|
52,798
|
|
|
|
18.84
|
%
|
|
|
52,950
|
|
|
|
20.16
|
%
|
|
|
49,122
|
|
|
|
19.03
|
%
|
|
|
37,762
|
|
|
|
16.14
|
%
|
All Other Lines
|
|
|
47,289
|
|
|
|
12.60
|
%
|
|
|
27,215
|
|
|
|
9.71
|
%
|
|
|
24,984
|
|
|
|
9.51
|
%
|
|
|
23,851
|
|
|
|
9.24
|
%
|
|
|
19,384
|
|
|
|
8.29
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
375,194
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
280,211
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
262,668
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
258,134
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
233,961
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As previously indicated, the Merger with ProCentury was
completed following the close of business on July, 31, 2008.
Therefore, the above table includes only five months of premium
for ProCentury for the year ended December 31, 2008.
From 2004 to 2007 there was a shift in our mix of business,
which was intended to diversify our product line and produce
more predictable and stable results. The mix of business has
impacted our expense ratio; as the percentage of workers
compensation premium in relation to our other lines of business
has declined from a high of approximately 47% in 2004 to
approximately 30% in 2008. The decline in workers
compensation premium from 2004 is primarily due to our decision
to exit a limited number of small programs that were no longer
meeting our pricing standards, an overall reduction in
audit-related premiums, and a decline in the amount of
13
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
residual market assignments we receive relative to workers
compensation premiums. The residual market assignments are in
essence a form of a tax whereby any workers
compensation risk that cannot be written in the voluntary market
is assigned to carriers underwriting workers compensation
business in that state.
In addition, workers compensation has declined due to a
reduction in premium writings as pricing competition has
intensified and due to past mandatory rate deceases in Florida,
Massachusetts and Nevada. We believe the benefit changes and
other actions we have taken in those states have allowed us to
maintain underwriting profitability even in these more
competitive environments.
The Merger with ProCentury contributed to the diversification of
our business mix even with only five months of reported results
for ProCentury. Significantly, the other liability line of
business accounted for approximately 26% of our premium in 2008,
compared to only 8% in 2007, and 5% in 2004. The majority of our
other liability line of business is related to primarily shorter
tail classes of business, such as habitational risks of hotels,
motels and apartments, contractors and mercantile operations.
The majority of our primary liability insurance policies have
limits between $500,000 and $1.0 million.
Additionally, prior to the Merger we had relatively low property
related premium and exposure to property perils. Historically
approximately 35% of ProCenturys production was property
related. Property classes include fire and allied lines,
non-liability portions of commercial multi-peril, and inland and
ocean marine. Our property business has an inherently short
tail, but has exposure to catastrophe perils. The majority of
the property business has limits of less than $2.0 million.
Through the use of treaty, automatic facultative and certificate
facultative reinsurance we retain the first $500,000 of each
individual loss for the current accident year. We attempt to
minimize catastrophic risk through reinsurance and geographic
diversification. Historically, we have not written property
coverage for the peril of wind on fixed properties in Florida or
within two counties of the Gulf of Mexico and in states along
the eastern seaboard.
Excluding the impact of the Merger, the increase in premium
volume in lines other than workers compensation has been
driven by new programs we have implemented with both existing
and new program agents, all of which have a history of
profitability and for which we believe we are receiving adequate
pricing to produce our targeted return on equity. Overall, both
net written premium and net earned premium have increased over
the same time frame, largely as a result of the increase in the
amount of premium we retain versus premium ceded to excess of
loss reinsurers.
A.M. Best Company (A.M. Best), which rates
insurance companies based on factors of concern to
policyholders, maintains a letter scale rating system ranging
from A++ (Superior) to F (In
Liquidation). In evaluating a companys financial and
operating performance, A.M. Best reviews the companys
profitability, leverage and liquidity, as well as its book of
business, the adequacy and soundness of its reinsurance, the
quality and estimated market value of its assets, the adequacy
of its loss and loss expense reserves, the adequacy of its
surplus, its capital structure, the experience and competence of
its management and its market presence. A.M. Best ratings
are directed toward the concerns of policyholders and insurance
agencies and are not intended for the protection of investors or
as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell securities. Currently
our financial strength rating by A.M. Best for our
Insurance Company Subsidiaries is an A−
(Excellent) rating.
Reserves
The following table shows the development of reserves for unpaid
losses and loss adjustment expenses (LAE) from 1999
through 2008 for our Insurance Company Subsidiaries including
PICL, and the deconsolidation impact of American Indemnity.
Development on the ProCentury acquired reserves is not included
for the years prior to 2008, which was the year of acquisition.
In accordance with SFAS 113, the bottom portion of the
table shows the impact of reinsurance for the years 1999 through
2008, reconciling the net reserves shown in the upper portion of
the table to gross reserves.
14
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
Additional information relating to our reserves is included
within the Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses and
Reinsurance Recoverables section of Note 1
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and
Note 5 Liability for Losses and Loss
Adjustment Expenses of the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements, as well as to the Critical Accounting
Policies section and the Reserves section of
Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis.
Analysis
of Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Development (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Reserves for losses and LAE at end of period
|
|
$
|
127,500
|
|
|
$
|
172,862
|
|
|
$
|
198,653
|
|
|
$
|
193,116
|
|
|
$
|
192,019
|
|
|
$
|
226,996
|
|
|
$
|
271,423
|
|
|
$
|
302,655
|
|
|
$
|
341,541
|
|
|
$
|
625,331
|
|
Deconsolidation of subsidiary(1)
|
|
|
(1,425
|
)
|
|
|
(3,744
|
)
|
|
|
(5,572
|
)
|
|
|
(2,973
|
)
|
|
|
(2,989
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted reserves for losses and LAE at end of period
|
|
$
|
126,075
|
|
|
$
|
169,118
|
|
|
$
|
193,081
|
|
|
$
|
190,143
|
|
|
$
|
189,030
|
|
|
$
|
226,996
|
|
|
$
|
271,423
|
|
|
$
|
302,655
|
|
|
$
|
341,541
|
|
|
$
|
625,331
|
|
Cumulative paid as of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 year later
|
|
|
54,928
|
|
|
|
70,952
|
|
|
|
77,038
|
|
|
|
78,023
|
|
|
|
71,427
|
|
|
|
79,056
|
|
|
|
83,271
|
|
|
|
81,779
|
|
|
|
95,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 years later
|
|
|
90,416
|
|
|
|
115,669
|
|
|
|
130,816
|
|
|
|
122,180
|
|
|
|
118,729
|
|
|
|
124,685
|
|
|
|
133,809
|
|
|
|
140,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 years later
|
|
|
116,001
|
|
|
|
146,548
|
|
|
|
157,663
|
|
|
|
151,720
|
|
|
|
145,279
|
|
|
|
153,780
|
|
|
|
170,226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 years later
|
|
|
132,995
|
|
|
|
160,673
|
|
|
|
176,172
|
|
|
|
167,288
|
|
|
|
159,220
|
|
|
|
171,946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 years later
|
|
|
139,939
|
|
|
|
171,992
|
|
|
|
186,847
|
|
|
|
174,778
|
|
|
|
169,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 years later
|
|
|
146,997
|
|
|
|
179,010
|
|
|
|
191,936
|
|
|
|
180,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 years later
|
|
|
150,514
|
|
|
|
182,954
|
|
|
|
196,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 years later
|
|
|
152,544
|
|
|
|
186,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 years later
|
|
|
154,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves re-estimated as of end of year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 year later
|
|
|
146,213
|
|
|
|
182,976
|
|
|
|
199,171
|
|
|
|
193,532
|
|
|
|
193,559
|
|
|
|
231,880
|
|
|
|
268,704
|
|
|
|
295,563
|
|
|
|
330,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 years later
|
|
|
144,453
|
|
|
|
186,191
|
|
|
|
205,017
|
|
|
|
196,448
|
|
|
|
203,394
|
|
|
|
227,462
|
|
|
|
263,069
|
|
|
|
286,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 years later
|
|
|
152,630
|
|
|
|
189,632
|
|
|
|
207,379
|
|
|
|
202,126
|
|
|
|
205,650
|
|
|
|
226,437
|
|
|
|
261,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 years later
|
|
|
156,997
|
|
|
|
190,305
|
|
|
|
211,394
|
|
|
|
203,738
|
|
|
|
202,748
|
|
|
|
226,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 years later
|
|
|
158,287
|
|
|
|
196,158
|
|
|
|
213,802
|
|
|
|
202,028
|
|
|
|
202,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 years later
|
|
|
159,449
|
|
|
|
199,520
|
|
|
|
212,274
|
|
|
|
201,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 years later
|
|
|
161,376
|
|
|
|
198,500
|
|
|
|
212,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 years later
|
|
|
161,023
|
|
|
|
198,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 years later
|
|
|
161,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cumulative (deficiency) redundancy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars
|
|
$
|
(34,973
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29,552
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,211
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,643
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13,686
|
)
|
|
$
|
504
|
|
|
$
|
10,104
|
|
|
$
|
16,008
|
|
|
$
|
11,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
27.7
|
%
|
|
|
17.5
|
%
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserves
|
|
|
126,075
|
|
|
|
169,118
|
|
|
|
193,081
|
|
|
|
190,143
|
|
|
|
189,030
|
|
|
|
226,996
|
|
|
|
271,423
|
|
|
|
302,655
|
|
|
|
341,541
|
|
|
|
625,331
|
|
Ceded reserves
|
|
|
101,744
|
|
|
|
168,962
|
|
|
|
195,943
|
|
|
|
181,817
|
|
|
|
147,446
|
|
|
|
151,161
|
|
|
|
187,254
|
|
|
|
198,422
|
|
|
|
198,461
|
|
|
|
260,366
|
|
Gross reserves
|
|
|
227,819
|
|
|
|
338,080
|
|
|
|
389,024
|
|
|
|
371,960
|
|
|
|
336,476
|
|
|
|
378,157
|
|
|
|
458,677
|
|
|
|
501,077
|
|
|
|
540,002
|
|
|
|
885,697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net re-estimated
|
|
|
161,048
|
|
|
|
198,670
|
|
|
|
212,292
|
|
|
|
201,786
|
|
|
|
202,716
|
|
|
|
226,492
|
|
|
|
261,319
|
|
|
|
286,647
|
|
|
|
330,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceded re-estimated
|
|
|
178,358
|
|
|
|
261,594
|
|
|
|
286,950
|
|
|
|
257,069
|
|
|
|
246,190
|
|
|
|
205,591
|
|
|
|
208,436
|
|
|
|
206,696
|
|
|
|
209,483
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross re-estimated
|
|
|
339,406
|
|
|
|
460,264
|
|
|
|
499,242
|
|
|
|
458,855
|
|
|
|
448,906
|
|
|
|
432,083
|
|
|
|
469,755
|
|
|
|
493,343
|
|
|
|
539,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross cumulative (deficiency) redundancy
|
|
$
|
(111,587
|
)
|
|
$
|
(122,184
|
)
|
|
$
|
(110,218
|
)
|
|
$
|
(86,895
|
)
|
|
$
|
(112,430
|
)
|
|
$
|
(53,926
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,078
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,734
|
|
|
$
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
In accordance with FIN 46(R),
we performed an evaluation of our business relationships and
determined our wholly owned subsidiary, American Indemnity, did
not meet the tests for consolidation, as neither us, nor our
subsidiary Star, are the primary beneficiaries of American
Indemnity. Therefore, effective January 1, 2004, we
deconsolidated American Indemnity on a prospective basis in
accordance with the provisions of FIN 46(R). Accordingly,
we have adjusted the reserves and development within the above
table. The adoption of FIN 46(R) and the deconsolidation of
American Indemnity did not have a material impact on our
consolidated balance sheet or consolidated statement of income.
|
15
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
The following table sets forth the difference between generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) reserves for
loss and loss adjustment expenses and statutory reserves for
loss and loss adjustment expenses at December 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
GAAP reserves for losses and LAE
|
|
$
|
885,697
|
|
|
$
|
540,002
|
|
Reinsurance recoverables for unpaid losses
|
|
|
(260,366
|
)
|
|
|
(198,461
|
)
|
Allowances against reinsurance recoverables*
|
|
|
(481
|
)
|
|
|
(833
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statutory reserves for losses and LAE
|
|
$
|
624,850
|
|
|
$
|
340,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
The GAAP allowance for reinsurance
recoverables is reported as a Schedule F penalty or a
non-admitted asset for the purpose of statutory accounting.
|
For the year ended December 31, 2008, we reported a
decrease of $103,000 in gross ultimate loss estimates for
accident years 2007 and prior, or 0.02% of $540.0 million
of gross losses and LAE reserves at January 1, 2008. The
gross development excludes development on ProCentury reserves
acquired on August 1, 2008. We reported an
$11.1 million decrease in net ultimate loss and LAE
estimates for accident years 2007 and prior, or 3.3% of
$341.5 million of Meadowbrook only net loss and LAE
reserves at January 1, 2008, because the table reflects
reserves as of January 1, 2008, which was pre-Merger. The
ProCentury acquired reserves of $247.7 million had prior
year favorable development of $5.7 million. Thus, total net
development on prior accident year reserves is
$16.8 million.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, we reported a
decrease of $8.9 million in gross ultimate loss estimates
for accident years 2006 and prior, or 1.8% of
$501.1 million of gross losses and LAE reserves at
January 1, 2007. We reported a $7.1 million decrease
in net ultimate losses and LAE estimates for accident years 2006
and prior, or 2.3% of $302.7 million.
Reinsurance
Information relating to our reinsurance structure and treaty
information is included within Note 6
Reinsurance of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Investments
Information relating to our investment portfolio is included
within Note 3 Investments of the Notes
to the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Investments
section of Item 7, Managements Discussion and
Analysis, as well as Item 7A Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Competition
and Pricing
We compete with other providers of risk management programs and
services, as well as, with traditional providers of commercial
insurance. Both the risk management and the traditional property
and casualty insurance markets are highly competitive. Our risk
management programs and services compete with products and
services offered by insurance companies, other providers of risk
management services (including domestic and foreign insurers and
reinsurers and insurance agents), as well as with self-insurance
plans, captives managed by others, and a variety of other
risk-financing vehicles and mechanisms. These competitive
products are offered by other companies that may have greater
financial resources than we do. Our agency operations compete
with other local, regional, and national insurance agencies for
individual client insurance needs.
The market for insurance and risk management products and
services is significantly influenced by market conditions
affecting the traditional property and casualty insurance
industry. Insurance market conditions historically have been
subject to significant variability due to premium rate
competition, natural disasters and other catastrophic events,
judicial trends, changes in the investment and interest rate
environment, regulation, and general economic conditions.
Pricing is a primary means of competition in the commercial
16
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
insurance market. Competition is also based on the availability
and quality of products, quality and speed of service (including
claims service), financial strength, ratings, distribution
systems and technical expertise. The primary basis for
competition among risk management providers varies with the
financial and insurance needs and resources of each potential
insured. Principal factors that are considered by insureds
include an analysis of the net present-value (after-tax) of the
cost of financing the insureds expected level of losses;
the amount of excess coverage provided in the event losses
exceed expected levels; cash flow and tax planning
considerations; and the expected quality and consistency of the
services to be provided. We believe that we are able to compete
based on our experience, the quality of our products and
services, and our program-oriented approach. However, our
ability to successfully compete is dependent upon a number of
factors, including market and competitive conditions, many of
which are outside of our control.
Regulation
Insurance
Company Regulation
Our Insurance Company Subsidiaries are subject to regulation in
the states where they conduct business. State insurance
regulations generally are designed to protect the interests of
policyholders, state insurance consumers or claimants rather
than shareholders or other investors. The nature and extent of
such state regulation varies by jurisdiction, but generally
involves:
|
|
|
|
|
prior approval of the acquisition of control of an insurance
company or of any company controlling an insurance company;
|
|
|
|
regulation of certain transactions entered into by an insurance
company with any of its affiliates;
|
|
|
|
approval of premium rates, forms and policies used for many
lines of insurance;
|
|
|
|
standards of solvency and minimum amounts of capital and surplus
that must be maintained;
|
|
|
|
establishment of reserves required to be maintained for unearned
premium, loss and loss adjustment expense, or for other purposes;
|
|
|
|
limitations on types and amounts of investments;
|
|
|
|
underwriting and claims settlement practices;
|
|
|
|
restrictions on the size of risks that may be insured by a
single company;
|
|
|
|
licensing of insurers and agents;
|
|
|
|
deposits of securities for the benefit of policyholders; and
|
|
|
|
the filing of periodic reports with respect to financial
condition and other matters.
|
In addition, state regulatory examiners perform periodic
examinations of insurance companies. The results of these
examinations can give rise to regulatory orders requiring
remedial, injunctive or other corrective action.
Insurance
Holding Company Regulation
We operate as an insurance holding company system and are
subject to regulation in the jurisdictions in which we conduct
business. These regulations require that each insurance company
in the system register with the insurance department of its
state of domicile and furnish information concerning the
operations of companies within the holding company system that
may materially affect the operations, management or financial
condition of the insurers within the system domiciled in that
state. The insurance laws similarly provide that all
transactions among members of a holding company system must be
fair and reasonable. Transactions between insurance subsidiaries
and their parents and affiliates generally must be disclosed to
the state regulators, and prior approval of the applicable state
insurance regulator generally is required for any material or
extraordinary transaction. In addition, a change of control of a
domestic insurer or of any controlling person requires the prior
approval of the state insurance regulator. Generally, any person
who acquires ten percent or more of the outstanding voting
securities of the insurer or its parent company is presumed to
have acquired control of the domestic insurer.
17
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
Various
State and Federal Regulation
Insurance companies are also affected by a variety of state and
federal legislative and regulatory measures and judicial
decisions that define and extend the risks and benefits for
which insurance is sought and provided. These include
redefinition of risk exposure in areas such as product
liability, environmental damage, and workers compensation.
In addition, individual state insurance departments may prevent
premium rates for some classes of insureds from reflecting the
level of risk assumed by the insurer for those classes. Such
developments may adversely affect the profitability of various
lines of insurance. In some cases, these adverse effects on
profitability can be minimized through repricing, if permitted
by applicable regulations, of coverages or limitations or
cessation of the affected business.
Reinsurance
Intermediary
Our reinsurance intermediary is also subject to regulation.
Under applicable regulations, the intermediary is responsible,
as a fiduciary, for funds received on account of the parties to
the reinsurance transaction and is required to hold such funds
in appropriate bank accounts subject to restrictions on
withdrawals and prohibitions on commingling.
Licensing
and Agency Contracts
We, or certain of our designated employees, must be licensed to
act as agents by state regulatory authorities in the states in
which we conduct business. Regulations and licensing laws vary
in individual states and are often complex.
Insurance licenses are issued by state insurance regulators upon
application and may be of perpetual duration or may require
periodic renewal. We must apply for and obtain appropriate new
licenses before we can expand into a new state on an admitted
basis or offer new lines of insurance that require separate or
additional licensing.
Insurers operating on an admitted basis must file premium rate
schedules and policy or coverage forms for review and approval
by the insurance regulators. In many states, rates and policy
forms must be approved prior to use, and insurance regulators
have broad discretion in judging whether an insurers rates
are adequate, not excessive and not unfairly discriminatory.
The applicable licensing laws and regulations in all states are
subject to amendment or reinterpretation by state regulatory
authorities, and such authorities are vested in most cases with
relatively broad discretion as to the granting, revocation,
suspension and renewal of licenses. The possibility exists that
we, or our employees, could be excluded, or temporarily
suspended, from continuing with some or all of our activities
in, or otherwise subjected to penalties by, a particular state.
Insurance
Regulation Concerning Change or Acquisition of
Control
Star, Williamsburg, and Ameritrust are domestic property and
casualty insurance companies organized under the insurance laws
(the Insurance Codes) of Michigan, while Savers,
Century, PIC, and Propic are organized under the Insurance Codes
of Missouri, Ohio, Texas, and Washington D.C., respectively. The
Insurance Codes provide that acquisition or change of control of
a domestic insurer or of any person that controls a domestic
insurer cannot be consummated without the prior approval of the
relevant insurance regulatory authority. A person seeking to
acquire control, directly or indirectly, of a domestic insurance
company or of any person controlling a domestic insurance
company must generally file with the relevant insurance
regulatory authority an application for change of control
(commonly known as a Form A) containing
information required by statute and published regulations and
provide a copy of such Form A to the domestic insurer. In
Michigan and Missouri, control is generally presumed to exist if
any person, directly or indirectly, owns, controls, holds with
the power to vote or holds proxies representing ten percent or
more of the voting securities of the company.
In addition, many state insurance regulatory laws contain
provisions that require pre-notification to state agencies of a
change in control of a non-domestic admitted insurance company
in that state. While such
pre-notification
statutes do not authorize the state agency to disapprove the
change of control, such statutes do
18
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
authorize issuance of a cease and desist order with respect to
the non-domestic admitted insurer if certain conditions exist,
such as undue market concentration.
Any future transactions that would constitute a change in
control would also generally require prior approval by the
Insurance Departments of Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Texas, and
Washington D.C. and would require pre-acquisition notification
in those states that have adopted pre-acquisition notification
provisions and in which the insurers are admitted. Such
requirements may deter, delay or prevent certain transactions
that could be advantageous to our shareholders.
Membership
in Insolvency Funds and Associations and Mandatory
Pools
Most states require admitted property and casualty insurers to
become members of insolvency funds or associations, which
generally protect policyholders against the insolvency of such
insurers. Members of the fund or association must contribute to
the payment of certain claims made against insolvent insurers.
Maximum contributions required by law in any one year vary
between 1% and 2% of annual premium written by a member in that
state. Assessments from insolvency funds were $196,000,
$156,000, and $306,000, for 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.
Most of these payments are recoverable through future policy
surcharges and premium tax reductions. Except for New Jersey,
business written on a surplus lines basis is not subject to
state guaranty fund assessments.
Our Insurance Company Subsidiaries are also required to
participate in various mandatory insurance facilities or in
funding mandatory pools, which are generally designed to provide
insurance coverage for consumers who are unable to obtain
insurance in the voluntary insurance market. Among the pools
participated in are those established in certain states to
provide windstorm and other similar types of property coverage.
These pools typically require all companies writing applicable
lines of insurance in the state for which the pool has been
established to fund deficiencies experienced by the pool based
upon each companys relative premium writings in that
state, with any excess funding typically distributed to the
participating companies on the same basis. To the extent that
reinsurance treaties do not cover these assessments, they may
adversely affect us. Total assessments paid to all such
facilities were $2.4 million, $2.6 million, and
$3.1 million, for 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.
Restrictions
on Dividends and Risk-Based Capital
For information on Restrictions on Dividends and Risk-based
Capital which affect us please refer to Note 10
Regulatory Matters and Rating Issues of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements and the Regulatory and
Rating Issues section within Item 7,
Managements Discussion and Analysis.
NAIC-IRIS
Ratios
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners
(NAIC) Insurance Regulatory Information System
(IRIS) was developed by a committee of state
insurance regulators and is primarily intended to assist state
insurance departments in executing their statutory mandates to
oversee the financial condition of insurance companies operating
in their respective states. IRIS identifies thirteen industry
ratios and specifies usual values for each ratio.
Departure from the usual values on four or more ratios generally
leads to inquiries or possible further review from individual
state insurance commissioners. Refer to the Regulatory and
Rating Issues section of Item 7, Managements
Discussion and Analysis.
Effect of
Federal Legislation
The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 (TRIA)
established a program under which the United States federal
government will provide governmental support for businesses that
suffer damages from certain acts of international terrorism. In
December 2005 under the Terrorism Risk Insurance Extension Act
of 2005, TRIA was modified and extended through
December 31, 2007. On December 26, 2007, Congress
extended and expanded TRIA beyond 2007. The terms of the
legislation enacted now also include domestic terrorist acts.
TRIA serves as an additional high layer of reinsurance against
losses that may arise from a terrorist incident. The impact to
us resulting from TRIA is minimal as we generally do not
underwrite risks that are considered
19
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
targets for terrorism, avoid concentration of exposures in both
property and workers compensation, and have terrorism
coverage included in our reinsurance treaties to cover the most
likely exposure.
Recently, as a result of comments made related to claims
handling practices by insurers in the wake of the 2005
hurricanes that struck the gulf coast states, Congress has
examined a possible repeal of the McCarran-Ferguson Act, which
allows insurers to compile and share loss data, develop standard
policy forms and manuals and predict future loss costs with
greater reliability, among other things. The ability of the
industry, under the exemption permitted in the McCarran-Ferguson
Act, to collect loss cost data and build a credible database as
a means of predicting future loss costs is an important part of
cost-based pricing. If the ability to collect this data were
removed, the predictability of future loss costs and the
reliability of pricing could be undermined. We are unable to
predict whether the McCarran-Ferguson Act will be repealed, or
that any such repeal, if enacted, would not have a material
adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
SEC
Investigation Developments
On April 2, 2008, the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) requested that ProCentury
voluntarily provide information relating to its construction
defect reserves for the fiscal years 2003 through 2006.
ProCentury has produced information and related documents in
response to this request and
follow-up
requests. Some documents the SEC requested were the subject of a
confidentiality agreement resulting in the SEC issuing a
subpoena requiring production of the subject documents. These
documents were subsequently provided to the SEC. Because the SEC
has not completed its review of the matter and the inquiry
relates back to fiscal year 2003, the SEC requested that Century
and certain of its former and existing officers execute a
tolling agreement, which would allow the SEC additional time to
conduct its inquiry and conclude whether additional action is
required. Century and the certain former and existing officers
executed a tolling agreement as requested. ProCentury is
prepared to respond to additional information requests of the
SEC with the goal of expediting a resolution of the inquiry. The
SEC has indicated that its inquiry and subpoena should not be
construed as an indication by the SEC or the staff that any
violation of law has occurred. Although we have confidence in
the integrity of the financial statements and ProCenturys
method for establishing reserves, including construction defect
reserves, we cannot predict the outcome of the inquiry at this
time. Based upon current information, we believe the resolution
of the matter will not have a material adverse effect on our
financial position, results of operation or cash flows.
Available
Information
Our Internet address is www.meadowbrook.com. There we
make available, free of charge, our Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q,
Current Reports on
Form 8-K,
Statements of Beneficial Ownership (Forms 3, 4, and 5), and
any amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably
practicable after we electronically file such material with, or
furnish to, the SEC. You may read and copy materials we file
with the SEC at the SECs Public Reference Room at
100 F Street, N.E., Washington D.C., 20549. You may
obtain information about the operation of the Public Reference
Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet site that contains
reports, proxy statements, and other information that we file at
www.sec.gov. Our SEC reports can also be accessed through
the investor relations section of our website. The information
found on our website is not part of this or any other report we
file with, or furnished to the SEC. The Charters of the
Nominating and Governance Committee, the Compensation Committee,
the Audit Committee, the Finance Committee, and the Investment
Committee of our Board of Directors are also available on our
website, or available in print to any shareholder who requests
this information. In addition, our Corporate Governance
documents, Code of Conduct, and our Business Conduct Policy are
available on our website, or in print to any shareholder who
requests this information.
Corporate
Governance Listing Standards
On June 4, 2008, we submitted to the New York Stock
Exchange a certificate signed by our Chief Executive Officer
certifying that he was not aware of any violation by us of New
York Stock Exchanges corporate governance listing
standards.
20
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
Difficulties
in combining ProCenturys operations with ours may prevent
us from achieving the expected benefits from the recent
merger.
There are significant risks and uncertainties associated with
our recent Merger with ProCentury. Upon completion of the
Merger, the combined entity was expected to provide shareholders
with substantial benefits, including among other things,
enhanced revenues, cost savings and operating efficiencies.
Achieving such expected benefits is subject to a number of
uncertainties, including whether the combined businesses are
integrated in an efficient and effective manner, and general
competitive factors in the marketplace. Failure to achieve these
benefits could result in increased costs, decreases in the
amount of expected revenues and diversion of managements
time and energy that could materially impact our business,
financial condition and operating results.
In addition, we may face substantial difficulties, costs and
delays in integration, including:
|
|
|
|
|
perceived adverse changes in product offerings available or
service standards, whether or not these changes do, in fact,
occur;
|
|
|
|
the retention of existing policyholders, general agents and
agents of each company; and
|
|
|
|
retaining and integrating management and other key employees of
the combined company.
|
Any one or all of these factors may increase our operating costs
or worsen our anticipated financial performance.
If our
estimates of reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses
are not adequate, we will have to increase our reserves, which
would result in reductions in net income, retained earnings,
statutory surplus, liquidity, and may limit our ability to pay
future dividends and service debt.
We establish reserves for losses and expenses related to the
adjustment of losses for the insurance policies we write. In
many cases, several years may elapse between the occurrence of
an insured loss, the reporting of the loss to us and our payment
of the loss. We determine the amount of these reserves based on
our best estimate and judgment of the losses and costs we will
incur on existing insurance policies. While we believe our
reserves are adequate, we base these reserves on assumptions
about past and future events. The following factors could have a
substantial impact on our future loss experience:
|
|
|
|
|
the amounts of claims settlements and awards;
|
|
|
|
claims development patterns;
|
|
|
|
legislative and judicial activity;
|
|
|
|
changes in inflation and economic conditions; and
|
|
|
|
the accuracy and timely reporting of claim information.
|
Actual losses and the costs we incur related to the adjustment
of losses under insurance policies could exceed, perhaps
substantially, the amount of reserves we establish. When we
increase reserves, our pre-tax income for the period will
decrease by a corresponding amount. An increase in reserves may
also require us to write off a portion of our deferred
acquisition costs asset, which would cause a further reduction
of pre-tax income in that period.
If our
financial strength ratings are reduced, we may be adversely
impacted.
Insurance companies are subject to financial strength ratings
produced by external rating agencies. Higher ratings generally
indicate greater financial stability and a stronger ability to
pay claims. Ratings are assigned
21
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
by rating agencies to insurers based upon factors they believe
are important to policyholders. Ratings are not recommendations
to buy, hold, or sell our securities.
Our ability to write business is most influenced by our rating
from A.M. Best. A.M. Best ratings are designed to
assess an insurers financial strength and ability to meet
continuing obligations to policyholders. Currently, our
financial strength rating from A.M. Best is
A− (Excellent) for our Insurance Company
Subsidiaries. There can be no assurance that A.M. Best will
not change this rating in the future. A rating downgrade from
A.M. Best could materially adversely affect the business we
write and our results of operations.
Severe
weather conditions and other catastrophes may result in an
increase in the number and amount of claims
incurred.
The majority of the property business acquired with the
ProCentury merger is exposed to the risk of severe weather
conditions and other catastrophes. Catastrophes can be caused by
various events, including natural events, such as hurricanes,
winter weather, tornadoes, windstorms, earthquakes, hailstorms,
severe thunderstorms and fires, and other events, such as
explosions, terrorist attacks and riots. The incidence and
severity of catastrophes and severe weather conditions are
inherently unpredictable. Severe weather conditions and
catastrophes can cause losses in the lines of business acquired
with the Merger. Generally these losses result in an increase in
the number of claims incurred as well as the amount of
compensation sought by claimants. In 2008, we recorded
$5.4 million of after tax losses related to catastrophe
losses. Currently, we purchase catastrophe reinsurance to cover
for a potential catastrophe. However, it is possible that a
catastrophic event or multiple catastrophic events could cause
our loss and loss adjustment expense reserves to increase and
our liquidity and financial condition to decline. Refer to
Note 6 # Reinsurance for a detailed description of
our reinsurance treaties and structure.
If
market conditions cause our reinsurance to be more costly or
unavailable, we may be required to bear increased risks or
reduce the level of our underwriting commitments.
As part of our overall risk and capacity management strategy, we
purchase reinsurance for significant amounts of risk
underwritten by our Insurance Company Subsidiaries, especially
for the excess-of-loss and severity risks. Market conditions
beyond our control determine the availability and cost of the
reinsurance we purchase, which may affect the level of our
business and profitability. Our reinsurance facilities are
generally subject to annual renewal. We may be unable to
maintain our current reinsurance facilities or to obtain other
reinsurance in adequate amounts and at favorable rates.
Increases in the cost of reinsurance would adversely affect our
profitability. In addition, if we are unable to renew our
expiring facilities or to obtain new reinsurance on favorable
terms, either our net exposure to risk would increase or, if we
are unwilling to bear an increase in net risk exposures, we
would have to reduce the amount of risk we underwrite.
We are
subject to credit risk with respect to the obligations of our
reinsurers and risk-sharing partners. The inability of our
reinsurers or risk-sharing partners to meet their obligations
could adversely affect our profitability.
We purchase reinsurance by transferring part of the risk we have
assumed (known as ceding) to a reinsurance company in exchange
for part of the premium we receive in connection with the risk
under pro rata and excess-of-loss contracts. These reinsurance
arrangements diversify our business and reduce our exposure to
large losses or from hazards of an unusual nature. Although
reinsurance makes the reinsurer liable to us to the extent the
risk is transferred, the ceding of insurance does not discharge
us of our primary liability to our policyholder. If all or any
of the reinsuring companies fail to pay or pay on a timely
basis, we would be liable for such defaulted amounts. Therefore,
we are subject to credit risk with respect to the obligations of
our reinsurers. If our reinsurers fail to pay us or fail to pay
on a timely basis, our financial results and financial condition
could be adversely affected. In order to minimize our exposure
to significant losses from reinsurer insolvencies, we evaluate
the financial condition of our reinsurers and monitor the
economic characteristics of the reinsurers on an ongoing basis
and, if appropriate, we may require trust agreements to
22
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
collateralize the reinsurers financial obligation to us. As of
December 31, 2008, the amount recoverable from our
reinsurers on paid and unpaid losses was $268.7 million.
In addition, with our risk-sharing programs, we are subject to
credit risk with respect to the payment of claims by our
clients captive,
rent-a-captive,
large deductible programs and indemnification agreements, as
well as on the portion of risk either ceded to captives or
retained by our clients. The capitalization and creditworthiness
of prospective risk-sharing partners is one of the factors we
consider upon entering into and renewing risk-sharing programs.
Generally, we collateralize balances due from our risk-sharing
partners through funds withheld trusts or stand-by letters of
credit issued by highly rated banks. No assurance can be given
regarding the future ability of any of our risk-sharing partners
to meet their obligations. The inability of our risk-sharing
partners to meet their obligations could adversely affect our
profitability.
We
face competitive pressures in our business that could cause our
revenues to decline and adversely affect our
profitability.
We compete with a large number of other companies in our
selected lines of business. We compete, and will continue to
compete, with major United States, foreign and other regional
insurers, as well as mutual companies, specialty insurance
companies, underwriting agencies and diversified financial
services companies. Many of our competitors have greater
financial and marketing resources than we do. Our profitability
could be adversely affected if we lose business or any of our
agents to competitors offering similar or better products at or
below our prices.
A number of new, proposed or potential legislative or industry
developments could further increase competition in our industry.
These developments include:
|
|
|
|
|
the formation of new insurers and an influx of new capital in
the marketplace as existing companies attempt to expand their
business as a result of better pricing
and/or terms;
|
|
|
|
programs in which state-sponsored entities provide property
insurance in catastrophe-prone areas or other alternative market
types of coverage; and
|
|
|
|
changing practices created by the Internet, which has increased
competition within the insurance business.
|
These developments could make the property and casualty
insurance marketplace more competitive by increasing the supply
of insurance capacity. In that event, the current market softens
further, and it may negatively influence our ability to maintain
or increase rates. Accordingly, these developments could have an
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
Our
results may fluctuate as a result of many factors, including
cyclical changes in the insurance industry.
The results of companies in the property and casualty insurance
industry historically have been subject to significant
fluctuations and uncertainties. Our industrys
profitability can be affected by:
|
|
|
|
|
rising levels of actual costs that are not known by companies at
the time they price their products;
|
|
|
|
volatile and unpredictable developments, including man-made,
weather-related and other natural catastrophes or terrorist
attacks;
|
|
|
|
changes in loss reserves resulting from the general claims and
legal environments as different types of claims arise and
judicial interpretations relating to the scope of insurers
liability develop;
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in interest rates, inflationary pressures and other
changes in the investment environment, which affect returns on
invested assets and may impact the ultimate payout of
losses; and
|
|
|
|
an increase in medical costs beyond historic or expected annual
inflationary levels.
|
23
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
The demand for property and casualty insurance can also vary
significantly, rising as the overall level of economic activity
increases and falling as that activity decreases. The property
and casualty insurance industry historically is cyclical in
nature, with periods of reduced underwriting capacity and
favorable premium rates alternating with periods of excess
underwriting capacity and flat or falling premium rates. These
fluctuations in demand and supply could produce underwriting
results that would have a negative impact on our financial
condition and results of operations.
Our
success depends on our ability to appropriately price the risks
we underwrite.
Our financial results depend on our ability to underwrite and
collect adequate premium rates for a wide variety of risks. Rate
adequacy is necessary to generate sufficient premiums to pay
losses, loss expenses and underwriting expenses and to earn a
profit. In order to price our products accurately, we must
collect and properly analyze a substantial amount of data,
develop, test and apply appropriate rating formulas, closely
monitor and timely recognize changes in trends and project both
severity and frequency of losses with reasonable accuracy. Our
ability to undertake these efforts successfully and price our
products accurately is subject to a number of risks and
uncertainties, some of which are outside our control. These
uncertainties include:
|
|
|
|
|
the availability of sufficient reliable data and our ability to
properly analyze available data;
|
|
|
|
the uncertainties that inherently characterize estimates and
assumptions;
|
|
|
|
the selection and application of appropriate rating and pricing
techniques;
|
|
|
|
any changes in legal standards, claim settlement practices,
medical care expenses and restoration costs;
|
|
|
|
changes in mandated rates or benefits set by the state
regulators; and
|
|
|
|
legislative actions.
|
Consequently, we could underprice risks, which would negatively
affect our profit margins, or we could overprice risks, which
could reduce our sales volume and competitiveness. In either
event, our profitability could be materially and adversely
affected.
The
failure of any of the loss limitation methods we employ could
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and
financial condition.
We seek to limit our loss exposure by writing a number of our
insurance and reinsurance contracts on an excess-of-loss basis.
Excess-of-loss insurance and reinsurance indemnifies the insured
against losses in excess of a specified amount. In addition, we
limit program size for each client and purchase third-party
reinsurance for our own account. In the case of our assumed
proportional reinsurance treaties, we seek per occurrence
limitations or loss and loss adjustment expense ratio caps to
limit the impact of losses ceded by the client. In proportional
reinsurance, the reinsurer shares a proportional part of the
premiums and losses of the reinsured. We also seek to limit our
loss exposure by geographic diversification. Various provisions
of our policies, such as limitations or exclusions from coverage
or choice of forum negotiated to limit our risks, may not be
enforceable in the manner we intend. As a result, one or more
catastrophic or other events could result in claims that
substantially exceed our expectations, which could have an
adverse effect on our results of operations or financial
condition.
Our
investment results and, therefore, our financial condition may
be impacted by changes in the business, financial condition or
operating results of the entities in which we invest, as well as
changes in government monetary policies, general economic
conditions and overall capital market conditions, all of which
impact interest rates.
Our results of operations depend, in part, on the performance of
our investments. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many
factors, including governmental monetary policies and domestic
and international economic
24
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
and political conditions. Fluctuations in interest rates affect
our returns on and the fair value of our fixed-maturity and
equity securities. In addition, market volatility can make it
difficult to value certain of our securities if trading becomes
less frequent. Interest rates in the United States are currently
low relative to historical levels. Our available for sale
fixed-maturity and equity securities are currently in a net
unrealized loss position, and an increase in interest rates
would further reduce the fair value of our investments in
available for sale fixed-maturity and equity securities. In
addition, defaults by third parties who fail to pay or perform
obligations could reduce our investment income and could result
in further investment losses in our portfolio.
We had fixed-maturity and equity investments with a fair value
of $1.0 billion as of December 31, 2008 that are
subject to:
|
|
|
|
|
credit risk, which is the risk that our investments will
decrease in value due to unfavorable changes in the financial
prospects or a downgrade in the credit rating of an entity in
which we have invested;
|
|
|
|
equity price risk, which is the risk that we will incur economic
loss due to a decline in common or preferred stock or bond
mutual fund share prices; and
|
|
|
|
interest rate risk, which is the risk that our investments may
decrease in value due to changes in interest rates.
|
Our fixed-maturity investment portfolio had a fair value of
$986.5 million as of December 31, 2008 and includes
mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities. As of
December 31, 2008, the fair value of the mortgage-backed
securities, asset-backed securities and collateralized mortgage
obligations totaled $306.8 million and constituted 30.4% of
our investment portfolio. As with other fixed-maturity
investments, the fair value of these securities fluctuates
depending on market and other general economic conditions and
the interest rate environment. Changes in interest rates can
expose us to prepayment risks on these investments. When
interest rates fall, mortgage-backed securities are prepaid more
quickly than expected and the holder must reinvest the proceeds
at lower interest rates. Our mortgage-backed securities
currently consist of securities with features that reduce the
risk of prepayment, but there is no guarantee that we will not
invest in other mortgage-backed securities that lack this
protection. In periods of increasing interest rates,
mortgage-backed securities are prepaid more slowly, which may
require us to receive interest payments that are below the
prevailing interest rates for longer than expected.
Our equity investment portfolio totaled $22.6 million as of
December 31, 2008. These investments are in preferred and
common stocks of individual companies, which are subject to
economic loss from the decline in preferred and common share
prices. As a result, the fair value of these investments will be
determined by the specific financial prospects of these
individual companies, as well as the equity markets in general.
We
could be forced to sell investments to meet our liquidity
requirements.
We believe we maintain adequate amounts of cash and short-term
investments to pay claims, and do not expect to have to sell
securities prematurely for such purposes. We may, however,
decide to sell securities as a result of changes in interest
rates, credit quality, the rate or repayment or other similar
factors. A significant increase in market interest rates could
result in a situation in which we are required to sell
securities at depressed prices to fund claims payments. Since
the securities within our investment portfolio are carried at
fair value, we expect these securities would be sold with no
material impact on our net equity, although it could result in
net realized losses. If these securities are sold, future net
investment income may be reduced if we are unable to reinvest in
securities with similar yields.
If our
businesses do not perform well, we may be required to recognize
an impairment of our goodwill, which could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations and financial
condition.
Goodwill represents the excess of the amounts we paid to acquire
subsidiaries and other businesses over the fair value of their
net assets at the date of acquisition. We test all existing
goodwill at least annually for
25
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
impairment, using a fair value approach on a reporting unit
basis. The reporting unit is the operating segment or a business
one level below that operating segment if discrete financial
information is prepared and regularly reviewed by management at
that level. Our annual assessment date for goodwill impairment
testing is October 1st. However, pursuant to
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, we are required to test for impairment more
frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the asset might be impaired. The fair value of the reporting
unit is impacted by the performance of the business and could be
adversely impacted by any efforts we make to limit risk. If it
is determined that the goodwill has been impaired, we would be
required to write down the goodwill by the amount of the
impairment, with a corresponding charge to net income. Such
impairments could have a material adverse effect on our results
of operations or financial position.
Because
we are heavily regulated by the states in which we operate, we
may be limited in the way we operate.
We are subject to extensive supervision and regulation in the
states in which we operate. The supervision and regulation
relate to numerous aspects of our business and financial
condition. The primary purpose of the supervision and regulation
is to maintain compliance with insurance regulations and to
protect policyholders and not our shareholders. The extent of
regulation varies, but generally is governed by state statutes.
These statutes delegate regulatory, supervisory and
administrative authority to state insurance departments. This
system of regulation covers, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
standards of solvency, including risk-based capital measurements;
|
|
|
|
restrictions on the nature, quality and concentration of
investments;
|
|
|
|
restrictions on the types of terms that we can include in the
insurance policies we offer;
|
|
|
|
required methods of accounting;
|
|
|
|
required reserves for unearned premiums, losses and other
purposes;
|
|
|
|
permissible underwriting and claims settlement
practices; and
|
|
|
|
assessments for the provision of funds necessary for the
settlement of covered claims under certain insurance policies
provided by impaired, insolvent or failed insurance companies.
|
The regulations of the state insurance departments may affect
the cost or demand for our products and may impede us from
obtaining rate increases or taking other actions we might wish
to take to increase our profitability. Furthermore, we may be
unable to maintain all required licenses and approvals and our
business may not fully comply with the wide variety of
applicable laws and regulations or the relevant authoritys
interpretation of the laws and regulations. Also, regulatory
authorities have relatively broad discretion to grant, renew or
revoke licenses and approvals. If we do not have the requisite
licenses and approvals or do not comply with applicable
regulatory requirements, the insurance regulatory authorities
could stop or temporarily suspend us from conducting some or all
of our activities or monetarily penalize us.
Also, the insurance industry has become the focus of increased
scrutiny by regulatory authorities relating to the placement of
insurance, as well as claims handling by insurers in the wake of
prior hurricane losses. Some states have adopted new disclosure
requirements relating to the placement of insurance business,
while other states are considering what additional regulatory
oversight might be required with regard to claims handling
activities of insurers. It is difficult to predict the outcome
of these regulatory activities, whether they will expand into
other areas of the business not yet contemplated, whether
activities and practices currently thought of to be lawful will
be characterized as unlawful and what form of additional or new
regulations may be finally adopted and what impact, if any, such
increase regulatory actions may have on our business. We have
received and responded to general industry-wide requests for
information from a few state insurance departments regarding
compensation with insurance agents. Subsequent to our responses,
we have not received any further inquiries or comments from the
state insurance departments.
26
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
Our
reliance on producers subjects us to their credit
risk.
With respect to our agency billed premiums generated by our
Insurance Company Subsidiaries, producers collect premiums from
the policyholders and forward them to us. In certain
jurisdictions, when the insured pays premium for these policies
to producers for payment, the premium might be considered to
have been paid under applicable insurance laws and the insured
will no longer be liable to us for those amounts, whether or not
we have actually received the premium from the producer.
Consequently, we assume a degree of credit risk associated with
producers. Although producers failures to remit premiums
to us have not caused a material adverse impact on us to date,
there may be instances where producers collect premium but do
not remit it to us and we may be required under applicable law
to provide the coverage set forth in the policy despite the
actual collection of the premium by us. Because the possibility
of these events is dependent in large part upon the financial
condition and internal operations of our producers, we may not
be able to quantify any potential exposure presented by the
risk. If we are unable to collect premium from our producers in
the future, our financial condition and results of operations
could be materially and adversely affected.
Provisions
of the Michigan Business Corporation Act, our articles of
incorporation and other corporate governing documents and the
insurance laws of Michigan and Missouri may discourage takeover
attempts.
The Michigan Business Corporation Act contains
anti-takeover provisions. Chapters 7A (the
Fair Price Act) and 7B (the Control Share
Act) of the Business Corporation Act apply to us and may
have an anti-takeover effect and may delay, defer or prevent a
tender offer or takeover attempt that a shareholder might
consider in their best interest, including those attempts that
might result in shareholders receiving a premium over market
price for their shares.
The Fair Price Act provides that a supermajority vote of ninety
percent of the shareholders and no less than two-thirds of the
votes of non interested shareholders must approve a
business combination. The Fair Price Act defines a
business combination to encompass any merger,
consolidation, share exchange, sale of assets, stock issue,
liquidation, or reclassification of securities involving an
interested shareholder or certain
affiliates. An interested shareholder is
generally any person who owns ten percent or more of the
outstanding voting shares of the company. An
affiliate is a person who directly or indirectly
controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, a
specified person. The supermajority vote required by the Fair
Price Act does not apply to business combinations that satisfy
certain conditions. These conditions include, among others:
(i) the purchase price to be paid for the shares of the
company in the business combination must be at least equal to
the highest of either (a) the market value of the shares or
(b) the highest per share price paid by the interested
shareholder within the preceding two-year period or in the
transaction in which the shareholder became an interested
shareholder, whichever is higher; and (ii) once becoming an
interested shareholder, the person may not become the beneficial
owner of any additional shares of the company except as part of
the transaction that resulted in the interested shareholder
becoming an interested shareholder or by virtue of proportionate
stock splits or stock dividends.
The Control Share Act establishes procedures governing
control share acquisitions of large public Michigan
corporations. A control share acquisition is defined as an
acquisition of shares by an acquirer that, when combined with
other shares held by that person or entity, would give the
acquirer voting power, alone or as part of a group, at or above
any of the following thresholds: 20%,
331/3%
or 50%. Under the Control Share Act, an acquirer may not vote
control shares unless the companys
disinterested shareholders (defined to exclude the acquiring
person, officers of the target company, and directors of the
target company who are also employees of the company) vote to
confer voting rights on the control shares. The Control Share
Act does not affect the voting rights of shares owned by an
acquiring person prior to the control share acquisition. The
Control Share Act entitles corporations to redeem control shares
from the acquiring person under certain circumstances. In other
cases, the Control Share Act confers dissenters right upon
all of the corporations shareholders except the acquiring
person.
27
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
Our articles of incorporation allow our Board of Directors to
issue one or more classes or series of preferred stock with
voting rights, preferences and other privileges as the Board of
Directors may determine. Also, we have adopted a shareholder
rights plan, which if triggered would significantly dilute the
stock ownership percentage of anyone who acquires more than
fifteen percent of our shares without the approval of our Board
of Directors. The existence of our shareholder rights plan and
the possible issuance of preferred shares could adversely affect
the holders of our common stock and could prevent, delay or
defer a change of control.
We are also subject to the laws of Michigan, Ohio, Texas,
Washington D.C., California, and Missouri, for which govern
insurance holding companies. Under these laws, a person
generally must obtain the applicable Insurance Departments
approval to acquire, directly or indirectly, five to ten percent
or more of the outstanding voting securities of our Insurance
Company Subsidiaries. An Insurance Departments
determination of whether to approve an acquisition would be
based on a variety of factors, including an evaluation of the
acquirers financial stability, the competence of its
management, and whether competition in that state would be
reduced. These laws may prevent, delay or defer a change of
control of us or our Insurance Company Subsidiaries.
Most
states assess our Insurance Company Subsidiaries to provide
funds for failing insurance companies and those assessments
could be material.
Our Insurance Company Subsidiaries are subject to assessments in
most states where we are licensed for the provision of funds
necessary for the settlement of covered claims under certain
policies provided by impaired, insolvent or failed insurance
companies. Maximum contributions required by law in any one year
vary by state, and have historically been less than one percent
of annual premiums written. We cannot predict with certainty the
amount of future assessments. Significant assessments could have
a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results
of operations.
We may
require additional capital in the future, which may not be
available or may only be available on unfavorable
terms.
Our future capital requirements depend on many factors,
including our ability to write new business successfully and to
establish premium rates and reserves at levels sufficient to
cover losses. To the extent that our present capital is
insufficient to meet future operating requirements
and/or cover
losses, we may need to raise additional funds through
financings. If we had to raise additional capital, equity or
debt financing may not be available or may be on terms that are
not favorable to us. In the case of equity financings, dilution
to our shareholders could result, and in any case such
securities may have rights, preferences and privileges that are
senior to those of the shares currently outstanding. If we
cannot obtain adequate capital on favorable terms or at all, our
business, operating results and financial condition could be
adversely affected.
Our
status as an insurance holding company with no direct operations
could adversely affect our ability to meet our debt obligations
and pay shareholder dividends.
We are a holding company that transacts the majority of our
business through our Insurance Company Subsidiaries. Our ability
to meet our obligations on our outstanding debt, and to pay our
expenses and shareholder dividends, may depend upon the surplus
and earnings of our Insurance Company Subsidiaries and their
ability to pay dividends to us. Payments of dividends to us by
our Insurance Company Subsidiaries are restricted by state
insurance laws, including laws establishing minimum solvency and
liquidity thresholds, and could be subject to revised
restrictions in the future. As a result, at times, we may not be
able to receive dividends from our Insurance Company
Subsidiaries and we may not receive dividends in amounts
necessary to meet our debt obligations or to pay shareholder
dividends on our capital stock. In addition, the payment of
shareholder dividends by us is within the discretion of our
Board of Directors and depends on numerous factors, including
our results of operations, financial condition, competition,
market conditions, capital requirements and other factors that
our Board of Directors considers relevant.
28
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
Our
performance is dependent on the continued services and
performance of our senior management and other key
personnel.
The success of our business is dependent on our ability to
retain and motivate our senior management and key management
personnel and their efforts. The loss of the services of any of
our executive officers or other key employees could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition,
and results of operations. We have existing employment or
severance agreements with Robert S. Cubbin, Karen M. Spaun,
Michael G. Costello, and other senior executives. We maintain a
key person life insurance policy on Robert S.
Cubbin, our President and CEO. The loss of any of these officers
or other key personnel could cause our ability to implement our
business strategies to be delayed or hindered.
Our future success also will depend on our ability to attract,
train, motivate and retain other highly skilled technical,
managerial, marketing, and customer service personnel.
Competition for these employees is strong and we may not be able
to successfully attract, integrate or retain sufficiently
qualified personnel. In addition, our future success depends on
our ability to attract, retain and motivate our agents and other
producers. Our failure to attract and retain the necessary
personnel and producers could have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Although
we have paid cash dividends in the past, we may not pay cash
dividends in the future.
The declaration and payment of dividends is subject to the
discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on our
financial condition, results of operations, cash requirements,
future prospects, regulatory and contractual restrictions on the
payment of dividends by our Insurance Company Subsidiaries and
other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors. There
is no requirement that we must, and we cannot assure you that we
will, declare and pay any dividends in the future. Our Board of
Directors may determine to retain such capital for general
corporate or other purposes.
We
rely on our information technology and telecommunications
systems to conduct our business.
Our business is dependent upon the uninterrupted functioning of
our information technology and telecommunication systems. We
rely upon our systems, as well as the systems of our vendors, to
underwrite and process our business, make claim payments,
provide customer service, provide policy administration
services, such as endorsements, cancellations and premium
collections, comply with insurance regulatory requirements and
perform actuarial and other analytical functions necessary for
pricing and product development. Our operations are dependent
upon our ability to timely and efficiently process our business
and protect our information and telecommunications systems from
physical loss, telecommunications failure or other similar
catastrophic events, as well as from security breaches. While we
have implemented business contingency plans and other reasonable
and appropriate internal controls to protect our systems from
interruption, loss or security breaches, a sustained business
interruption or system failure could adversely impact our
ability to process our business, provide customer service, pay
claims in a timely manner or perform other necessary business
functions. Likewise, a security breach of our computer systems
could also interrupt or damage our operations or harm our
reputation in the event confidential customer information is
disclosed to third parties. Either of these circumstances could
have a material adverse effect upon our financial condition,
operations or reputation.
Managing
technology initiatives and obtaining the efficiencies
anticipated with technology implementation may present
significant challenges.
While technological enhancements and initiatives can streamline
several business processes and ultimately reduce the costs of
operations, these initiatives can present short-term costs and
implementation risks. Projections of associated costs,
implementation timelines, and the benefits of those results may
be inaccurate and such inaccuracies could increase over time. In
addition, there are risks associated with not achieving the
anticipated efficiencies from technology implementation that
could impact our financial condition and results of operations.
29
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
|
|
ITEM 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
None.
In 1998, we purchased land in Southfield, Michigan for a cost of
$3.2 million. In 2004, the construction of our corporate
headquarters was completed on half of this land and in December
2004 we relocated to the new office building. Our corporate
headquarters are approximately 72,000 square feet. The
total construction cost of the building approximated
$12.0 million, which was paid in full at the closing on
January 19, 2005.
In 2003, we entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement, whereby
we agreed to sell the remaining portion of the land to an
unaffiliated third party for the purpose of constructing an
office building adjacent to our corporate headquarters. Under
the Purchase and Sale Agreement, the third party agreed to pay
$2.1 million for the land, $1.2 million for their
share of the costs related to the common areas of the building,
and other related costs of approximately $226,000. In May 2005,
we closed on the transaction.
The unaffiliated third party had until July 2007 to pay the
principal balance, however we negotiated an extension through
May 1, 2009. The unaffiliated third party continues to pay
interest during the extension period and has the option to pay
the principal balance, or $750,000 less in exchange for granting
us an ownership interest in their portion of the building.
With our Merger with ProCentury, we assumed the lease of their
corporate headquarters, an approximately 44,000 square foot
office building located in Westerville, Ohio. The lease
agreement for this building has an initial term of ten years,
which expires in 2013.
We are also a party to various leases, including other leases
acquired from ProCentury, for other locations in which we have
offices. We do not consider any of these leases to be material.
|
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
We are subject at times to various claims, lawsuits and
proceedings relating principally to alleged errors or omissions
in the placement of insurance, claims administration, consulting
services and other business transactions arising in the ordinary
course of business. Where appropriate, we vigorously defend such
claims, lawsuits and proceedings. Some of these claims, lawsuits
and proceedings seek damages, including consequential, exemplary
or punitive damages, in amounts that could, if awarded, be
significant. Most of the claims, lawsuits and proceedings
arising in the ordinary course of business are covered by errors
and omissions insurance or other appropriate insurance. In terms
of deductibles associated with such insurance, we have
established provisions against these items, which are believed
to be adequate in light of current information and legal advice.
In accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies, if it is probable that an asset has
been impaired or a liability has been incurred as of the date of
the financial statements and the amount of loss is estimable, an
accrual is provided for the costs to resolve these claims in our
consolidated financial statements. Period expenses related to
the defense of such claims are included in other operating
expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.
With the assistance of outside counsel, we adjust such
provisions according to new developments or changes in the
strategy in dealing with such matters. On the basis of current
information, we do not expect the outcome of the claims,
lawsuits and proceedings to which we are subject to, either
individually, or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition. However, it is possible that
future results of operations or cash flows for any particular
quarter or annual period could be materially affected by an
unfavorable resolution of any such matters.
|
|
ITEM 4.
|
SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
None.
30
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5.
|
Market
Price of and Dividends on the Registrants Common Equity
and Related Stockholder Matters
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholder Information
Corporate Headquarters
26255 American Drive
Southfield, MI
48034-6112
Phone:
(248) 358-1100
Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
Ernst & Young LLP
Detroit, MI
Corporate Counsel
Howard & Howard Attorneys PLLC. Royal Oak, MI
|
|
Transfer Agent & Registrar
BNY Mellon Shareowner Services P.O. Box 358015
Pittsburg, PA 15252-8015
Stock Listing
New York Stock Exchange Symbol: MIG
|
|
Annual Meeting
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders
will be held at:
2:00 p.m.
May 14, 2009
Corporate Headquarters
26255 American Drive
Southfield, MI
|
Shareholder
Relations and
Form 10-K
A copy of our 2008 Annual Report and
Form 10-K,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, may be
obtained upon written request to our Financial Reporting
Department at our corporate headquarters, or contact:
Karen M. Spaun, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
(248) 204-8178
karen.spaun@meadowbrook.com
Holly A. Moltane, Controller GAAP Financial
Reporting
(248) 204-8590
holly.moltane@meadowbrook.com
Direct
Investment Plan
Our Shareholder Investment Plan (Plan) offers a
simple and systematic way to purchase our common stock without
paying brokerage fees or commissions. With the Plans many
flexible features, an account may be customized to reflect
individual financial and investment objectives. If you would
like additional information including a prospectus and an
application, please contact:
BNY Mellon Shareowner Services
1-800-
442-8134
Or visit their website at
www.bnymellon.com/shareowner/isd
Share
Price and Dividend Information
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under
the symbol MIG. The following table sets forth the
high and low closing sale prices of our common shares as
reported by the NYSE and our quarterly dividends declared for
each period shown:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
9.95
|
|
|
$
|
7.16
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
8.60
|
|
|
|
5.20
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
8.25
|
|
|
|
5.20
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
7.59
|
|
|
|
3.97
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
31
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
11.68
|
|
|
$
|
9.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
12.45
|
|
|
|
9.94
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
11.57
|
|
|
|
8.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
8.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
For additional information regarding dividend restrictions,
refer to the Liquidity and Capital Resources section of
Managements Discussion and Analysis.
When evaluating the declaration of a dividend, our Board of
Directors considers a variety of factors, including but not
limited to, our cash flow, liquidity needs, results of
operations strategic plans, industry conditions, our overall
financial condition and other relevant factors. As a holding
company, the ability to pay cash dividends is partially
dependent on dividends and other permitted payments from our
subsidiaries. The Insurance Company Subsidiaries, which include
the insurance companies acquired in the ProCentury merger, have
paid dividends of $46.2 million in 2008. We did not receive
any dividends in 2007 from our Insurance Company Subsidiaries.
Shareholders
of Record
As of March 4, 2009, there were approximately
274 shareholders of record of our common stock. For
purposes of this determination, Cede & Co., the
nominee for the Depositary Trust Company is treated as one
holder.
Purchase
of Equity Securities by the Issuer
At the our board meeting on July 25, 2008, our Board of
Directors authorized management to purchase up to
3,000,000 shares of our common stock in market transactions
for a period not to exceed twenty-four months. This share
repurchase plan replaced the existing share repurchase plan
authorized in October 2007.
The following table presents information with respect to
repurchases of our common stock made during the quarterly period
ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
Maximum Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
of Shares That May
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly
|
|
|
Yet Be Repurchased
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Paid per
|
|
|
Announced Plans or
|
|
|
Under the Plans or
|
|
Period
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Programs
|
|
|
Programs
|
|
|
October 1 October 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 1 November 30, 2008
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
$
|
4.51
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
2,300,000
|
|
December 1 December 31, 2008
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
5.07
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
2,200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
$
|
4.70
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
Performance
Graph
The following graph sets forth, for the five year period ended
December 31, 2008, the cumulative total stockholder return
for the Companys common stock, the Russell 2000 Index, and
a Peer Group index. The graph assumes the investment of $100 on
December 31, 2003 in Common Stock of the Company, the
Russell 2000 Index, and a Peer Group index. The stock price
performance represented on the following graph is not
necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.
The performance graph shall not be deemed soliciting
material or to be filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, nor shall such information be deemed to
be incorporated by reference into any future filing of the
Company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 or Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended, except to the extent the
Company specifically incorporates it by reference into such
filing.
Comparison of Five Year Cumulative Total Return
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
Index
|
|
|
12/31/03
|
|
|
12/31/04
|
|
|
12/31/05
|
|
|
12/31/06
|
|
|
12/31/07
|
|
|
12/31/08
|
|
Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc.
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
117.97
|
|
|
|
|
138.06
|
|
|
|
|
233.81
|
|
|
|
|
222.46
|
|
|
|
|
154.23
|
|
|
|
Russell 2000
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
118.33
|
|
|
|
|
123.72
|
|
|
|
|
146.44
|
|
|
|
|
144.15
|
|
|
|
|
95.44
|
|
|
|
SNL Insurance $1B-$2.5B
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
131.59
|
|
|
|
|
151.94
|
|
|
|
|
190.73
|
|
|
|
|
184.93
|
|
|
|
|
152.28
|
|
|
|
33
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
|
|
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share and ratio data)
|
|
|
Income Statement Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross written premiums
|
|
$
|
457,683
|
|
|
$
|
346,451
|
|
|
$
|
330,872
|
|
|
$
|
332,209
|
|
|
$
|
313,493
|
|
Net written premiums
|
|
|
375,194
|
|
|
|
280,211
|
|
|
|
262,668
|
|
|
|
258,134
|
|
|
|
233,961
|
|
Net earned premiums
|
|
|
369,721
|
|
|
|
268,197
|
|
|
|
254,920
|
|
|
|
249,959
|
|
|
|
214,493
|
|
Net commissions and fees
|
|
|
42,904
|
|
|
|
45,988
|
|
|
|
41,172
|
|
|
|
35,916
|
|
|
|
40,535
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
36,624
|
|
|
|
26,400
|
|
|
|
22,075
|
|
|
|
17,975
|
|
|
|
14,911
|
|
Net realized (losses) gains
|
|
|
(11,422
|
)
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
339
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
437,827
|
|
|
|
340,735
|
|
|
|
318,236
|
|
|
|
304,017
|
|
|
|
270,278
|
|
Net losses and LAE
|
|
|
212,885
|
|
|
|
150,969
|
|
|
|
146,293
|
|
|
|
151,542
|
|
|
|
135,938
|
|
Policy acquisition and other underwriting expenses
|
|
|
69,294
|
|
|
|
53,717
|
|
|
|
50,479
|
|
|
|
44,439
|
|
|
|
33,424
|
|
Other administrative expenses
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
32,269
|
|
|
|
28,824
|
|
|
|
26,810
|
|
|
|
25,588
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
|
62,862
|
|
|
|
56,433
|
|
|
|
54,569
|
|
|
|
51,331
|
|
|
|
52,297
|
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
6,310
|
|
|
|
1,930
|
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
7,681
|
|
|
|
6,030
|
|
|
|
5,976
|
|
|
|
3,856
|
|
|
|
2,281
|
|
Income before income taxes and equity earnings of affiliates
|
|
|
43,795
|
|
|
|
39,387
|
|
|
|
31,505
|
|
|
|
25,666
|
|
|
|
20,374
|
|
Equity earnings of affiliates
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
27,397
|
|
|
|
27,992
|
|
|
|
22,034
|
|
|
|
17,910
|
|
|
|
14,061
|
|
Earnings per share Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments and cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1,085,648
|
|
|
$
|
651,601
|
|
|
$
|
527,600
|
|
|
$
|
460,233
|
|
|
$
|
402,156
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,813,916
|
|
|
|
1,113,966
|
|
|
|
969,000
|
|
|
|
901,344
|
|
|
|
801,696
|
|
Loss and LAE reserves
|
|
|
885,697
|
|
|
|
540,002
|
|
|
|
501,077
|
|
|
|
458,677
|
|
|
|
378,157
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
60,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
12,144
|
|
Debentures
|
|
|
80,930
|
|
|
|
55,930
|
|
|
|
55,930
|
|
|
|
55,930
|
|
|
|
35,310
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
438,170
|
|
|
|
301,894
|
|
|
|
201,693
|
|
|
|
177,365
|
|
|
|
167,510
|
|
Book value per share
|
|
$
|
7.64
|
|
|
$
|
8.16
|
|
|
$
|
6.93
|
|
|
$
|
6.19
|
|
|
$
|
5.76
|
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP ratios (insurance companies only):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss and LAE ratio(1)
|
|
|
62.0
|
%
|
|
|
61.2
|
%
|
|
|
62.3
|
%
|
|
|
65.2
|
%
|
|
|
67.9
|
%
|
Expense ratio(1)
|
|
|
31.3
|
%
|
|
|
34.2
|
%
|
|
|
34.5
|
%
|
|
|
33.5
|
%
|
|
|
33.5
|
%
|
Combined ratio
|
|
|
93.3
|
%
|
|
|
95.4
|
%
|
|
|
96.8
|
%
|
|
|
98.7
|
%
|
|
|
101.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Both the GAAP loss and loss adjustment expense ratio and the
GAAP expense ratio are calculated based upon unconsolidated
insurance company operations. The following table sets forth the
intercompany fees, which are eliminated upon consolidation. |
34
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
Unconsolidated
GAAP data Ratio Calculation Table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Net earned premiums
|
|
$
|
369,721
|
|
|
$
|
268,197
|
|
|
$
|
254,920
|
|
|
$
|
249,959
|
|
|
$
|
214,493
|
|
Consolidated net losses and LAE
|
|
$
|
212,885
|
|
|
$
|
150,969
|
|
|
$
|
146,293
|
|
|
$
|
151,542
|
|
|
$
|
135,938
|
|
Intercompany claim fees
|
|
|
16,296
|
|
|
|
13,058
|
|
|
|
12,553
|
|
|
|
11,523
|
|
|
|
9,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unconsolidated net losses and LAE
|
|
$
|
229,181
|
|
|
$
|
164,027
|
|
|
$
|
158,846
|
|
|
$
|
163,065
|
|
|
$
|
145,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP net loss and LAE ratio
|
|
|
62.0
|
%
|
|
|
61.2
|
%
|
|
|
62.3
|
%
|
|
|
65.2
|
%
|
|
|
67.9
|
%
|
Consolidated policy acquisition and other underwriting expenses
|
|
|
69,349
|
|
|
$
|
53,717
|
|
|
$
|
50,479
|
|
|
$
|
44,439
|
|
|
$
|
33,424
|
|
Intercompany administrative and other underwriting fees
|
|
|
46,371
|
|
|
|
37,890
|
|
|
|
37,442
|
|
|
|
39,231
|
|
|
|
38,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unconsolidated policy acquisition and other underwriting expenses
|
|
$
|
115,720
|
|
|
$
|
91,607
|
|
|
$
|
87,921
|
|
|
$
|
83,670
|
|
|
$
|
71,783
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP expense ratio
|
|
|
31.3
|
%
|
|
|
34.2
|
%
|
|
|
34.5
|
%
|
|
|
33.5
|
%
|
|
|
33.5
|
%
|
GAAP combined ratio
|
|
|
93.3
|
%
|
|
|
95.4
|
%
|
|
|
96.8
|
%
|
|
|
98.7
|
%
|
|
|
101.4
|
%
|
Management uses the GAAP combined ratio and its components to
assess and benchmark underwriting performance.
The GAAP combined ratio is the sum of the GAAP loss and loss
adjustment expense ratio and the GAAP expense ratio. The GAAP
loss and loss adjustment expense ratio is the unconsolidated net
loss and loss adjustment expense in relation to net earned
premiums. The GAAP expense ratio is the unconsolidated policy
acquisition and other underwriting expenses in relation to net
earned premiums.
As previously indicated, the Merger with ProCentury was
completed following the close of business on July, 31, 2008.
Therefore, the above table includes only five months of
financial results for ProCentury as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
35
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
Forward-Looking
Statements
This
Form 10-K
may provide information including certain statements which
constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. These include statements regarding the intent, belief,
or current expectations of management, including, but not
limited to, those statements that use the words
believes, expects,
anticipates, estimates, or similar
expressions. You are cautioned that any such forward-looking
statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve
a number of risks and uncertainties, and results could differ
materially from those indicated by such forward-looking
statements. Among the important factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those indicated by such
forward-looking statements are: the frequency and severity of
claims; uncertainties inherent in reserve estimates;
catastrophic events; a change in the demand for, pricing of,
availability or collectibility of reinsurance; increased rate
pressure on premiums; ability to obtain rate increases in
current market conditions; investment rate of return; changes in
and adherence to insurance regulation; actions taken by
regulators, rating agencies or lenders; attainment of certain
processing efficiencies; changing rates of inflation; general
economic conditions and other risks identified in our reports
and registration statements filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. We are not under any obligation to (and
expressly disclaim any such obligation to) update or alter our
forward-looking statements whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
Business
Overview
We are a publicly traded specialty insurance company and risk
management organization offering a full range of insurance
products and services, focused on niche and specialty program
business, which we believe is under served by the standard
insurance market. Program business refers to an aggregation of
individually underwritten risks that have some unique
characteristic and are distributed through a select group of
focused general agencies, retail agencies and program
administrators. We perform the majority of underwriting and
claims services associated with these programs. We also provide
property and casualty insurance coverage and services through
programs and specialty risk management solutions for agents,
professional and trade associations, public entities and small
to medium-sized insureds. In addition, we also operate as an
insurance agency representing unaffiliated insurance companies
in placing insurance coverages for policyholders. We define our
business segments as specialty insurance operations and agency
operations.
On July 31, 2008, our merger with ProCentury Corporation
(ProCentury) was completed (Merger).
Under the terms of the merger agreement, ProCentury shareholders
were entitled to receive, for each ProCentury common share,
either $20.00 in cash or Meadowbrook common stock based on a
2.5000 exchange ratio, subject to adjustment as described within
the merger agreement. In accordance with the merger agreement,
the stock price used in determining the final cash and share
consideration portion of the purchase price was based on the
volume-weighted average sales price of a share of Meadowbrook
common stock for the
30-day
trading period ending on the sixth trading day before the
completion of the Merger, or $5.7326. Based upon the final
proration, the total purchase price was $227.2 million, of
which $99.1 million consisted of cash, $122.7 million
in newly issued common stock, and approximately
$5.4 million in transaction related costs. The total number
of common shares issued for purposes of the stock portion of the
purchase price was 21.1 million shares.
ProCentury is a specialty insurance company, which primarily
underwrites general liability, commercial property,
environmental, garage keepers, commercial multi-peril,
commercial auto, surety, and marine insurance primarily in the
excess and surplus lines, or non-admitted market
through a select group of general agents. The excess and surplus
lines market provides insurance coverage for customers with
hard-to-place risks that standard or admitted insurers typically
choose not to insure.
36
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
Five months of earnings of ProCentury are included in our
financial statements as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
In July 2007, we completed an offering of 6,437,500 additional
shares of newly issued common stock at $9.65 per share. The
gross proceeds of the offering were $62.1 million. The net
proceeds were $58.6 million. The net proceeds from the
offering are being utilized to support organic growth within our
underwriting operations, to fund select acquisitions and other
general corporate purposes. Upon receipt of the net proceeds, we
also reduced our outstanding line of credit balance from
$22.0 million to zero.
Specialty
Insurance Operations
Our specialty insurance operations segment, which includes
insurance company specialty programs and fee-for-service
specialty or managed programs, focuses on specialty or niche
insurance business. Our specialty insurance operations provide
services and coverages tailored to meet specific requirements of
defined client groups and their members. These services include
risk management consulting, claims administration and handling,
loss control and prevention, and reinsurance placement, along
with various types of property and casualty insurance coverage,
including workers compensation, commercial multiple peril,
general liability, commercial auto liability, excess and surplus
lines, environmental, garage keepers, surety, legal,
professional liability, errors and omissions, inland marine, and
other lines of business, where we see a market need and a profit
potential. Insurance coverage is provided primarily to
associations or similar groups of members and to specified
classes of business of our agents. We recognize revenue related
to the services and coverages the specialty insurance operations
provides within seven categories: net earned premiums,
management fees, claims fees, loss control fees, reinsurance
placement, investment income, and net realized gains (losses).
We included the results of operations related to ProCentury
within the specialty insurance operations. Therefore, specialty
insurance operations include five months of results for
ProCentury.
With a fee-for-service or managed program, we earn revenue by
providing certain operational functions and other services to a
clients risk-bearing entity, but generally do not share in
the operating results of the program. The fees we receive from
these programs are generally either a fixed amount or based on a
percentage of premium serviced or claim count.
We provide three broad types of insurance company programs,
including fully insured, captives and client risk-sharing
programs. With a client risk-sharing program, our Insurance
Company Subsidiaries underwrite individual primary insurance
policies for members of a group or association, or a specific
industry and then share the operating results with the client or
client group through a reinsurance agreement with a captive or
rent-a-captive.
In some instances, a captive owned by a client or client group
reinsures a portion of the risk on a quota-share basis. A
captive is an insurance company or reinsurance company, which is
formed for the purpose of insuring or reinsuring risks related
to the businesses of its shareholders or members. A
rent-a-captive
allows organizations to obtain the benefits of a captive
insurance company, without the initial costs and capital
investment required to form their own captive. This is often an
interim step utilized by groups and associations prior to
forming their own captive. As part of its participation in a
rent-a-captive,
the client group purchases redeemable preferred stock of our
unconsolidated subsidiary. These shares entitle the client group
to participate in profits and losses of the program through a
dividend or additional capital contribution. Dividends or
additional capital contributions are determined and accrued on
the basis of underwriting profits or losses plus investment
income on trust accounts less costs. The captive and
rent-a-captive
structures are licensed reinsurance companies, which have a
self-sustaining integrated set of activities and assets, and are
in the reinsurance business for the purpose of providing a
return to their investors, who are the shareholders
(primary beneficiaries) of the captive company. The
primary beneficiaries have their own equity at risk, decision
making authority, and the ability to absorb losses. Therefore,
the transactions associated with the captive and
rent-a-captive
structures are accounted for under the provisions of
SFAS No. 113, Accounting and Reporting for
Reinsurance of Short-Duration and Long-Duration
Contracts.
37
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
In addition to premium revenue and investment income from our
net retained portion of the operating results, we may also be
compensated through the receipt of fees for policy issuance
services and acquisition costs, captive administration,
reinsurance placement, loss prevention services, and claims
administrative and handling services. In addition, we may
benefit from the fees our risk management subsidiary earns for
services we perform on behalf of our Insurance Company
Subsidiaries. These fees are eliminated upon consolidation.
However, the fees associated with the captives portion of
the program are reimbursed through a ceding commission. For
financial reporting purposes, ceding commissions are treated as
a reduction in underwriting expenses.
With fully insured programs, we provide our insurance products
without a risk-bearing mechanism and derive revenue from net
earned premiums and investment income. Fully insured programs
are generally developed in response to specific market
opportunities and may evolve into a risk-sharing arrangement.
Agency
Operations
We earn commission revenue through the operation of our retail
property and casualty insurance agencies, located in Michigan,
California, and Florida. The agency operations produce
commercial, personal lines, life, and accident and health
insurance, for more than fifty unaffiliated insurance carriers.
The agency produces an immaterial amount of business for our
affiliated Insurance Company Subsidiaries.
In recent years, we have derived our revenue from the following
sources (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earned premiums
|
|
$
|
369,721
|
|
|
$
|
268,197
|
|
|
$
|
254,920
|
|
Management fees
|
|
|
21,168
|
|
|
|
23,963
|
|
|
|
18,714
|
|
Claims fees
|
|
|
8,879
|
|
|
|
9,025
|
|
|
|
8,776
|
|
Loss control fees
|
|
|
2,069
|
|
|
|
2,151
|
|
|
|
2,216
|
|
Reinsurance placement
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
35,888
|
|
|
|
25,487
|
|
|
|
21,115
|
|
Net realized (losses) gains
|
|
|
(11,422
|
)
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty insurance operations
|
|
|
427,031
|
|
|
|
329,902
|
|
|
|
306,545
|
|
Agency operations
|
|
|
11,064
|
|
|
|
11,316
|
|
|
|
12,285
|
|
Holding Company interest income earned
|
|
|
736
|
|
|
|
913
|
|
|
|
960
|
|
Intersegment revenue
|
|
|
(1,004
|
)
|
|
|
(1,396
|
)
|
|
|
(1,554
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated revenue
|
|
$
|
437,827
|
|
|
$
|
340,735
|
|
|
$
|
318,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Critical
Accounting Policies
General
In certain circumstances, we are required to make estimates and
assumptions that affect amounts reported in our consolidated
financial statements and related footnotes. We evaluate these
estimates and assumptions on an on-going basis based on a
variety of factors. There can be no assurance, however, the
actual results will not be materially different than our
estimates and assumptions, and that reported results of
operation will not be affected by accounting adjustments needed
to reflect changes in these estimates and assumptions. We
believe the following policies are the most sensitive to
estimates and judgments.
38
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
Losses
and Loss Adjustment Expenses
Significant periods of time can elapse between the occurrence of
a loss, the reporting of the loss to the insurer, and the
insurers payment of that loss. To recognize liabilities
for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
(LAE), insurers establish reserves as balance sheet
liabilities representing estimates of amounts needed to pay
reported and unreported net losses and LAE.
We establish a liability for losses and LAE, which represents
case based estimates of reported unpaid losses and LAE and
actuarial estimates of incurred but not reported losses
(IBNR) and LAE. Such liabilities, by necessity, are
based upon estimates and, while we believe the amount of our
reserves is adequate, the ultimate liability may be greater or
less than the estimate. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
we have accrued $885.7 million and $540.0 million of
gross loss and LAE reserves, respectively.
Components
of Losses and Loss Adjustment Expense
The following table sets forth our gross and net reserves for
losses and LAE based upon an underlying source of data, at
December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case
|
|
|
IBNR
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Direct
|
|
$
|
251,362
|
|
|
$
|
501,500
|
|
|
$
|
752,862
|
|
Assumed-Directly Managed(1)
|
|
|
41,228
|
|
|
|
59,313
|
|
|
|
100,541
|
|
Assumed-Residual Markets(2)
|
|
|
9,893
|
|
|
|
14,091
|
|
|
|
23,984
|
|
Assumed-Retroceded
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
1,588
|
|
Assumed-Other
|
|
|
4,384
|
|
|
|
2,338
|
|
|
|
6,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
308,155
|
|
|
|
577,542
|
|
|
|
885,697
|
|
Less Ceded
|
|
|
95,016
|
|
|
|
165,350
|
|
|
|
260,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
$
|
213,139
|
|
|
$
|
412,192
|
|
|
$
|
625,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Directly managed represents
business managed and processed by our underwriting, claims, and
loss control departments, utilizing our internal systems and
related controls.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Residual markets represent
mandatory pooled workers compensation business allocated
to individual insurance company writers based on the
insurers market share in a given state.
|
The reserves referenced in the above table related to our direct
and assumed business, which we directly manage and are
established through transactions processed through our internal
systems and related controls. Accordingly, the case reserves are
established on a current basis, therefore there is no delay or
lag in reporting of losses from a ceding company, and IBNR is
determined utilizing various actuarial methods based upon
historical data. Ultimate reserve estimates related to assumed
business from residual markets are provided by individual states
on a two quarter lag between the date of the evaluation and the
receipt of the estimate from the National Council on
Compensation Insurance (NCCI), and include an
estimated reserve based upon actuarial methods for this lag.
Assumed business, which is subsequently 100% retroceded to
participating reinsurers, relates to business previously
discontinued and now is in run-off. Relative to assumed business
from other sources, we receive case and paid loss data within a
forty-five day reporting period and develop our estimates for
IBNR based on both current and historical data.
The completeness and accuracy of data received from cedants on
assumed business that we do not manage directly is verified
through monthly reconciliations to detailed statements,
inception to date rollforwards of claim data, actuarial
estimates of historical trends, field audits, and a series of
management oversight reports on a program basis.
39
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
The following table sets forth our net case and IBNR reserves
for losses and LAE by line of business at December 31, 2008
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Case
|
|
|
Net IBNR
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Workers Compensation
|
|
$
|
61,383
|
|
|
$
|
86,430
|
|
|
$
|
147,813
|
|
Residual Markets
|
|
|
9,893
|
|
|
|
14,091
|
|
|
|
23,984
|
|
Commercial Multiple Peril/General Liability
|
|
|
82,317
|
|
|
|
234,871
|
|
|
|
317,188
|
|
Commercial Automobile
|
|
|
36,980
|
|
|
|
55,808
|
|
|
|
92,788
|
|
Other
|
|
|
22,566
|
|
|
|
20,992
|
|
|
|
43,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
213,139
|
|
|
$
|
412,192
|
|
|
$
|
625,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claim
Reserving Process and Methodology
When a claim is reported to one of our Insurance Company
Subsidiaries, for the majority of claims, our claims personnel
within our risk management subsidiary will establish a case
reserve for the estimated amount of the ultimate payment. The
amount of the reserve is primarily based upon a
case-by-case
evaluation of the type of claim involved, the circumstances
surrounding each claim, and the policy provisions relating to
the type of losses. The estimate reflects the informed judgment
of such personnel based on general insurance reserving
practices, which focus on the ultimate probable cost of each
reported claim, as well as the experience and knowledge of the
claims person. Until the claim is resolved, these estimates are
revised as deemed necessary by the responsible claims personnel
based on subsequent developments, new information or periodic
reviews of the claims.
In addition to case reserves and in accordance with industry
practice, we maintain estimates of reserves for losses and LAE
incurred but not yet reported. We project an estimate of
ultimate losses and LAE at each reporting date. The difference
between the projected ultimate loss and LAE reserves and the
case loss reserves and LAE reserves, is carried as IBNR
reserves. By using both estimates of reported claims and IBNR
determined using generally accepted actuarial reserving
techniques, we estimate the ultimate liability for losses and
LAE, net of reinsurance recoverables.
In developing claim and claim adjustment expense reserve
estimates, we perform a complete and detailed reserve analyses
each quarter. To perform this analysis, the data is organized at
a reserve category level. A reserve category can be
a line of business such as commercial automobile liability, or
it may be a particular geographical area within a line of
business such as Nevada workers compensation. The reserves
within a reserve category level are characterized as either
short tail or long tail. About 95% of our reserves can be
characterized as coming from long tail lines of business. For
long tail business, several years may lapse between the time the
business is written and the time when all claims are settled.
Our long-tail exposures include workers compensation,
commercial automobile liability, general liability, professional
liability, products liability, excess, and umbrella. Short-tail
exposures include property, commercial automobile physical
damage, a portion of ocean marine, and inland marine. The
analyses generally review losses both gross and net of
reinsurance.
The standard actuarial methods that we use to project ultimate
losses for both long-tail and short-tail exposures include, but
are not limited to, the following:
Paid Development Method
Incurred Development Method
Paid Bornhuetter-Ferguson Method
Reported Bornhuetter-Ferguson Method
Initial Expected Loss Method
Paid Roll-forward Method
40
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
Incurred Roll-forward Method
Construction Defect Method
All of these methods are consistently applied to every reserve
category where they are applicable and they create indications
for each accident year. We use judgment selecting the best
estimate from within these estimates or adjusted estimates. As
such, no one method or group of methods is strictly used for any
line of business or reserve category within a line of business.
The individual selections by year are our best judgments based
on the strengths and weaknesses of the method, indications, the
inherent variability in the data and the specific modifications
to selections for data characteristics.
A brief description of the methods and some discussion of their
inherent strengths, weaknesses and uses are as follows:
Paid Development Method. This method uses
historical, cumulative paid losses by accident year and develops
those actual losses to estimated ultimate losses based upon the
assumption that each accident year will develop to estimated
ultimate cost in a manner that is analogous to prior years,
adjusted as deemed appropriate for the expected effects of known
changes in the claim payment environment, and to the extent
necessary supplemented by analyses of the development of broader
industry data.
Selection of the paid loss pattern requires analysis of several
factors including the impact of inflation on claims costs, the
rate at which claims professionals make claim payments and close
claims, the impact of judicial decisions, the impact of
underwriting changes, the impact of large claim payments and
other factors. Claim cost inflation itself requires evaluation
of changes in the cost of repairing or replacing property,
changes in the cost of medical care, changes in the cost of wage
replacement, judicial decisions, legislative changes and other
factors. Because this method assumes that losses are paid at a
consistent rate, changes in any of these factors can impact the
results. Since the method does not rely on case reserves, it is
not directly influenced by changes in the adequacy of case
reserves.
Incurred Development Method. This method uses
historical, cumulative reported loss dollars by accident year
and develops those actual losses to estimated ultimate losses
based upon the assumption that each accident year will develop
to estimated ultimate cost in a manner that is analogous to
prior years, adjusted as deemed appropriate for the expected
effects of known changes in the claim payment and case reserving
environment, and to the extent necessary supplemented by
analyses of the development of broader industry data.
Since the method uses more data (case reserves in addition to
paid losses) than the paid development method, the incurred
development patterns may be less variable than paid patterns.
However, selection of the incurred loss pattern requires
analysis of all of the factors listed in the description of the
paid development method. In addition, the inclusion of case
reserves can lead to distortions if changes in case reserving
practices have taken place and the use of case incurred losses
may not eliminate the issues associated with estimating the
incurred loss pattern subsequent to the most mature point
available.
Paid Bornhuetter-Ferguson Method. This is a
method that assigns partial weight to initial expected losses
for each accident year and partial weight to observed paid
losses. The weights assigned to the initial expected losses
decrease as the accident year matures.
The method assumes that only future losses will develop at the
expected loss ratio level. The percent of paid loss to ultimate
loss implied from the paid development method is used to
determine what percentage of ultimate loss is yet to be paid.
The use of the pattern from the paid development method requires
consideration of all factors listed in the description of the
paid development method. The estimate of losses yet to be paid
is added to current paid losses to estimate the ultimate loss
for each year. This method will react very slowly if actual
ultimate loss ratios are different from expectations due to
changes not accounted for by the expected loss ratio calculation.
41
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
Reported Bornhuetter-Ferguson Method. This is
a method that assigns partial weight to the initial expected
losses and partial weight to observed reported loss dollars
(paid losses plus case reserves). The weights assigned to the
initial expected losses decrease as the accident year matures.
The use of case incurred losses instead of paid losses can
result in development patterns that are less variable than paid
patterns. However, the inclusion of case reserves can lead to
distortions if changes in case reserving have taken place, and
the method requires analysis of all the factors that need to be
reviewed for the expected loss ratio and incurred development
methods.
Initial Expected Loss Method. This method is
used directly, and as an input to the Bornhuetter-Ferguson
methods. Initial expected losses for an accident year are based
on adjusting prior accident year projections to the current
accident year levels using underlying loss trends, rate changes,
benefit changes, reinsurance structure and cost changes and
other pertinent adjustments specific to the line of business.
This method may be useful if loss development patterns are
inconsistent, losses emerge very slowly, or there is relatively
little loss history from which to estimate future losses. The
selection of the expected loss ratio requires analysis of loss
ratios from earlier accident years or pricing studies and
analysis of inflationary trends, frequency trends, rate changes,
underwriting changes, and other applicable factors.
Paid Roll-forward Method. This method adjusts
prior estimates of ultimate losses based on the actual paid loss
emergence in the quarter compared to the expected emergence. It
is useful in determining reserves that avoid overreacting to
ordinary fluctuations in the development patterns.
Incurred Roll-forward Method. This method
adjusts prior estimates of ultimate losses based on the actual
case incurred loss emergence in the quarter compared to the
expected emergence. It may also be useful in determining
reserves that avoid overreacting to ordinary fluctuations in the
development patterns and generally reacts faster than the paid
roll-forward method.
Claims for short-tail lines of business settle more quickly than
long-tail lines of business, and in general, loss development
factors for short-tail lines are smaller than long-tail lines.
For long-tail lines, we tend to rely on initial expected loss
methods throughout the current accident year then move to
development factor based methods for older accident years.
Development methods on short-tail lines are generally reliable
in the third and fourth quarter of the initial accident year and
recorded loss ratios reflect a blend of the development and
forecast methods. Short-tail lines represent 5% of our total
reserves at December 31, 2008.
Construction Defect Method. The provision for IBNR loss
and ALAE for construction defect claims is analyzed by
projecting the number of IBNR claim counts and applying a
selected severity (i.e., a frequency severity type approach).
The provision for development on reported claims is projected
using a methodology similar to the incurred loss development
approach described above. However, the claims are organized in a
report year rather than accident year format. The advantage of
this is that it substantially reduces the length or
tail of the development.
The reserve categories where the above methods are not
applicable are few. The largest of these is our workers
compensation residual market reserve category, where we utilize
detailed reserve analyses performed by the industry statistical
agency NCCI in making our estimates. We adjust these estimates
for timing differences in the reporting of the data. The other
reserve categories that deviate from the above methods are
smaller; as a group constituting approximately one percent of
the total reserves.
Each of the methods listed above requires the selection and
application of parameters and assumptions. For all but the
initial expected loss method, the key assumptions are the
patterns with which our aggregate claims data will be paid or
will emerge over time (development patterns). These
patterns incorporate inherent assumptions of claims cost
inflation rates and trends in the frequency of claims, both
overall and by severity of claim. These are affected by
underlying loss trends, rate changes, benefit changes,
reinsurance
42
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
structure and cost changes and other pertinent adjustments which
are explicit key assumptions underlying the initial expected
loss method. Each of these key assumptions is discussed in the
following paragraphs.
To analyze the development patterns, we compile, to the extent
available, long-term and short-term historical data for our
insurance subsidiaries, organized in a manner which provides an
indication of the historical development patterns. To the extent
that the historical data may provide insufficient information
about future patterns whether due to environmental
changes such as legislation or due to the small volume or short
history of data for some segments of our business
benchmarks based on industry data, and forecasts made by
industry rating bureaus regarding the effect of legislative
benefit changes on such patterns, may be used to supplement,
adjust, or replace patterns based on our insurance
companies historical data.
Actuarial judgment is required in selecting the patterns to
apply to each segment of data being analyzed, and our views
regarding current and future claim patterns are among the
factors that enter into our establishment of the reserve for
losses and LAE at each balance sheet date. When short-term
averages or external rate bureau analyses indicate the claims
patterns are changing from historical company or industry
patterns, the new or forecasted information typically is
factored into the methodologies. When new claims emergence or
payment patterns have appeared in the actual data repeatedly
over multiple evaluations, those new patterns are given greater
weight in the selection process.
Because some claims are paid over many years, the selection of
claim emergence and payment patterns involves judgmentally
estimating the manner in which recently occurring claims will
develop for many years and at times, decades in the future. When
it is likely the actual development will occur in the distant
future, the potential for actual development to differ
substantially from historical patterns or current projections is
increased.
This process assumes that past experience, adjusted for the
effects of current developments and anticipated trends, is an
appropriate basis for predicting future events. In particular,
the development factor based methods all have as a key
assumption that the development of losses in the future will
follow a pattern similar to those measured by past experience
and as adjusted either explicitly or by actuarial judgment.
There is no precise method for subsequently evaluating the
impact of any specific factor on the adequacy of reserves,
because the eventual deficiency or redundancy is affected by
multiple and varied factors. With respect to the ultimate
estimates for losses and LAE, the key assumptions remained
consistent for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.
Variability
of Claim Reserve Estimates
By its nature, the estimate of ultimate losses and LAE is
subject to variability due to differences between our
assumptions and actual events in the future. Although many
factors influence the actual cost of claims and our
corresponding reserve estimates, we do not measure and estimate
values for all of these variables individually. This is due to
the fact that many of the factors known to impact the cost of
claims cannot be measured directly, such as the impact on claim
costs due to economic inflation, coverage interpretations and
jury determinations. In most instances, we rely on our
historical experience or industry information to estimate the
values for the variables that are explicitly used in our reserve
analyses. We assume that the historical effect of these
unmeasured factors, which is embedded in our experience or
industry experience, is representative of the future effects of
these factors. Where we have reason to expect a change in the
effect of one of these factors, we perform analyses to perform
the necessary adjustments.
One implicit assumption underlying development patterns is that
the claims inflation trends will continue into the future
similar to their past patterns. To estimate the sensitivity of
the estimated ultimate loss and settlement expense payments to
an unexpected change in inflationary trends, our actuarial
department derives expected payment patterns separately for each
major line of business. These patterns were applied to the
December 31, 2008 loss and settlement expense reserves to
generate estimated annual incremental loss and
43
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
settlement expense payments for each subsequent calendar year.
Then, for the purpose of sensitivity testing, an explicit annual
inflationary variance of one percent was added to the
inflationary trend that is implicitly embedded in the estimated
payment pattern, and revised incremental loss and settlement
expense payments were calculated. General inflation trends have
been fairly stable over the past several years but there have
been fluctuations of one to two percent over the past ten years
and therefore we used a one percent annual inflation variance
factor. The effect differed by line of business but overall was
a three percent change in reserve adequacy or approximately
$11.9 million effect on after tax net income. A variance of
this type would typically be recognized in loss and settlement
expense reserves and, accordingly, would not have a material
effect on liquidity because the claims have not been paid.
An explicit assumption used in the analysis is the set of
initial expected loss ratios (IELRs) used in the
current accident year reserve projections and in some of the
prior accident year ultimate loss indications. To estimate the
sensitivity of the estimated ultimate loss to a change in IELRs,
the actuarial department recasted the loss reserve indications
using a set of IELRs all one percent higher than the final
IELRs. The effect differed by line of business but overall a one
percent change in reserve adequacy or a $4.2 million effect
on after tax net income. Often the loss ratios by line of
business will vary from the IELR in different directions causing
them to partially offset each other. A variance of this type
would typically be recognized in loss and settlement expense
reserves and, accordingly, would not have a material effect on
liquidity because the claims have not been paid.
The other factors having influence upon the loss and LAE reserve
levels are too numerous and interdependent to efficiently model
and test for sensitivity. Likewise, the development factors by
reserve category and age are too numerous to model and test for
sensitivity. Instead, ranges are estimated by reserve category
considering past history, fluctuations in the development
patterns, emerging issues, trends and other factors. The ranges
are compiled and the total range is estimated considering the
sensitivity to all of the underlying factors together. The
resulting range is our best estimate of the expected ongoing
variability in the loss reserves.
Historic development as shown within the Analysis of
Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Development table has
been five percent or less in the last four years but was ten to
twenty-eight percent in the years prior to the underwriting and
reserving shift in 2002. At that time, we concentrated our
efforts on eliminating underwriting relationships where we had
substantial liabilities above an aggregate exposure retained by
risk sharing associations and captives. For a large share of our
business, we also accelerated the pace at which we brought the
claim administration to our employees and away from outside
third party administrators. This change enabled us to more
rapidly recognize trends and underlying loss patterns, and
establish more accurate reserves in a timely manner.
Our range of loss and LAE reserves table shows that presently we
estimate them as going from favorable development of 8.9% to
unfavorable of 6.1%. The range was evaluated based on the
ultimate loss estimates from the actuarial methods described
above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax Impact on Earnings from a Variance in Future Loss
Payments and Case Reserves as of December 31, 2008
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Line of Business
|
|
Minimum Reserve Range
|
|
|
Maximum Reserve Range
|
|
|
Workers Compensation (including Residual Markets)
|
|
$
|
(11,286
|
)
|
|
|
(6.6
|
)%
|
|
$
|
6,007
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
Commercial Multiple Peril/General Liability
|
|
|
(35,199
|
)
|
|
|
(11.1
|
)%
|
|
|
25,640
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
Commercial Automobile
|
|
|
(5,888
|
)
|
|
|
(6.3
|
)%
|
|
|
4,346
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
(2,971
|
)
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)%
|
|
|
2,335
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(55,344
|
)
|
|
|
(8.9
|
)%
|
|
$
|
38,328
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
The sensitivity around our workers compensation reserves
primarily reflects the size and the maturity of the underlying
book of business. Our workers compensation reserves
represent 27% of our total reserves at December 31, 2008.
The sensitivity around our commercial multiple peril/general
liability reserves primarily reflects the longer duration of
reserves relating to our liability excess program, which started
in 2003, and construction defect exposure, which together
represent approximately 19% of the $317.2 million reserves
in this line of business as of December 31, 2008. These
lines of business are subject to greater uncertainty than the
remainder of our book of business. With the ProCentury merger,
our liability reserves represent slightly over 50% of our total
reserves as of December 31, 2008.
The sensitivity around our commercial automobile reserves
primarily reflects the speed of reporting of the underlying
losses, as well as the maturity of the case law surrounding
automobile liability.
The sensitivity around the other lines of business primarily
reflects the size of the underlying book of business. Our other
reserves represent 7% of total reserves at December 31,
2008. A large portion of these reserves represent professional
liability programs which tend to be claims-made and reinsured at
lower limits, therefore reducing the volatility that is inherent
in a smaller book of business. Another large portion represents
property claims, which have a shorter reporting and payout
pattern than liability and workers compensation claims.
All of our reserves are sensitive to changes in the underlying
claim payment and case reserving practices, as well as the other
sources of variations mentioned above.
Reinsurance
Recoverables
Reinsurance recoverables represent (1) amounts currently
due from reinsurers on paid losses and LAE, (2) amounts
recoverable from reinsurers on case basis estimates of reported
losses and LAE, and (3) amounts recoverable from reinsurers
on actuarial estimates of IBNR losses and LAE. Such
recoverables, by necessity, are based upon estimates.
Reinsurance does not legally discharge us from our legal
liability to our insureds, but it does make the assuming
reinsurer liable to us to the extent of the reinsurance ceded.
Instead of being netted against the appropriate liabilities,
ceded unearned premiums and reinsurance recoverables on paid and
unpaid losses and LAE are reported separately as assets in our
consolidated balance sheets. Reinsurance recoverable balances
are also subject to credit risk associated with the particular
reinsurer. In our selection of reinsurers, we continually
evaluate their financial stability. While we believe our
reinsurance recoverables are collectible, the ultimate
recoverable may be greater or less than the amount accrued. At
December 31, 2008 and 2007, reinsurance recoverables on
paid and unpaid losses were $268.7 million and
$199.5 million, respectively.
In our risk-sharing programs, we are subject to credit risk with
respect to the payment of claims by our clients captive,
rent-a-captive,
large deductible programs, indemnification agreements, or on the
portion of risk either ceded to the captives, or retained by the
clients. The capitalization and credit worthiness of prospective
risk-sharing partners is one of the factors we consider upon
entering into and renewing risk-sharing programs. We
collateralize balances due from our risk-sharing partners
through funds withheld trusts or stand-by letters of credit
issued by highly rated banks. We have historically maintained an
allowance for the potential uncollectibility of certain
reinsurance balances due from some risk-sharing partners, some
of which may be in dispute. At the end of each quarter, an
analysis of these exposures is conducted to determine the
potential exposure to uncollectibility. At December 31,
2008, we believe this allowance is adequate. To date, we have
not, in the aggregate, experienced material difficulties in
collecting balances from our risk-sharing partners. No assurance
can be given, however, regarding the future ability of our
risk-sharing partners to meet their obligations.
45
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
Valuation
of Investments, Other Than Temporary Impairments of Securities,
and Unrealized Losses on Investments
Our investment securities are classified as available for sale.
Investments classified as available for sale are available to be
sold in the future in response to our liquidity needs, changes
in market interest rates, tax strategies and asset-liability
management strategies, among other reasons. Available for sale
securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and
losses reported in the accumulated other comprehensive income
component of shareholders equity, net of deferred taxes
and, accordingly, have no effect on net income. However, if
there is a decline in the fair value of an investment below its
cost and the decline is considered other than temporary, the
amount of decline below cost is charged to earnings. The fair
value for fixed maturity securities is largely determined by one
of two primary pricing methods: third party pricing service
market prices or independent broker quotations. Prices from
third party pricing services are often unavailable for
securities that are rarely traded or are traded only in
privately negotiated transactions and as a result, certain of
our securities are priced via independent broker quotations.
Short-term investments are carried at amortized cost, which
approximates fair value.
Our investment portfolio is primarily invested in debt
securities classified as available for sale, with a
concentration in fixed income securities of a high quality. Our
investment philosophy is to maximize after-tax earnings and
maintain significant investments in tax-exempt bonds. Our policy
for the valuation of temporarily impaired securities is to
determine impairment based on analysis of, but not limited to,
the following factors: (1) rating downgrade or other credit
event (e.g., failure to pay interest when due);
(2) financial condition and near-term prospects of the
issuer, including any specific events which may influence the
operations of the issuer such as changes in technology or
discontinuance of a business segment; (3) prospects for the
issuers industry segment; and (4) intent and ability
to retain the investment for a period of time sufficient to
allow for anticipated recovery in fair value. We evaluate our
investments in securities to determine other than temporary
impairment, no less than quarterly. Investments that are deemed
other than temporarily impaired are written down to their
estimated net fair value and the related losses recognized in
income.
Additionally, for certain securitized financial assets with
contractual cash flows (including asset-backed securities), FASB
Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
99-20,
Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on
Purchased and Retained Beneficial Interests in Securitized
Financial Assets, requires us to periodically update
our best estimate of cash flows over the life of the security.
If management determines that the fair value of a securitized
financial asset is less than its carrying amount and there has
been a decrease in the present value of the estimated cash flows
since the last revised estimate, considering both timing and
amount, then an other than temporary impairment is recognized.
After review of our investment portfolio in relation to our
policy, we recorded a pre-tax realized loss of
$11.7 million, for the year ended December 31, 2008,
related to certain preferred stock investments, including Fannie
Mae, Freddie Mac, and Lehman Brothers investments, as well as
several corporate bonds and asset-backed and mortgage-backed
securities. There were no impaired investments written down in
2007 or 2006.
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, we had 365 and 160
securities that were in an unrealized loss position,
respectively. Of the securities held at December 31, 2008,
twenty-three had an aggregate $24.5 million and
$3.7 million fair value and unrealized loss, respectively,
and have been in an unrealized loss position for more than
twelve months. At December 31, 2007, 128 had an aggregate
$122.2 million and $1.3 million fair value and
unrealized loss, respectively, and have been in an unrealized
loss position for more than twelve months. As of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, gross unrealized losses on
available for sale securities were $22.1 million and
$1.9 million, respectively.
46
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
Revenue
Recognition
Premiums written, which include direct, assumed, and ceded
premiums are recognized as earned on a pro rata basis over the
life of the policy term. Unearned premiums represent the portion
of premiums written that are applicable to the unexpired terms
of an in force policy. Provisions for unearned premiums on
reinsurance assumed from others are made on the basis of ceding
reports when received and actuarial estimates.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, total assumed written
premiums were $8.1 million, of which $1.0 million
relates to assumed business we manage directly. The remaining
$7.1 million of assumed written premiums relates to
residual markets, mandatory assumed pool business, and other
unaffiliated entities.
Assumed premium estimates are specifically related to the
mandatory assumed pool business from the NCCI, or residual
market business. The pools cede workers compensation
business to participating companies based upon the individual
companys market share by state. The activity is reported
from the NCCI to participating companies on a two quarter lag.
To accommodate this lag, we estimate premium and loss activity
based on historical and market based results. Historically, we
have not experienced any material difficulties or disputes in
collecting balances from NCCI; and therefore, no provision for
doubtful accounts is recorded related to the assumed premium
estimate.
In addition, certain premiums are subject to retrospective
premium adjustments. Premium is recognized over the term of the
insurance contract. During the three months ended March 31,
2008, we recorded a $1.8 million adjustment to reduce a
premium accrual associated with a discontinued retrospectively
rated policy with one of its risk sharing partners.
Fee income, which includes risk management consulting, loss
control, and claims services, is recognized during the period
the services are provided. Depending on the terms of the
contract, claims processing fees are recognized as revenue over
the estimated life of the claims, or the estimated life of the
contract. For those contracts that provide services beyond the
expiration or termination of the contract, fees are deferred in
an amount equal to managements estimate of our obligation
to continue to provide services in the future.
Commission income, which includes reinsurance placement, is
recorded on the later of the effective date or the billing date
of the policies on which they were earned. Commission income is
reported net of any sub-producer commission expense. Any
commission adjustments that occur subsequent to the earnings
process are recognized upon notification from the insurance
companies. Profit sharing commissions from insurance companies
are recognized when determinable, which is when such commissions
are received.
We review, on an ongoing basis, the collectibility of our
receivables and establish an allowance for estimated
uncollectible accounts. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
the allowance for uncollectibles on receivables was
$2.9 million and $2.7 million, respectively.
Legal
Contingencies
We are subject at times to various claims, lawsuits and
proceedings relating principally to alleged errors or omissions
in the placement of insurance, claims administration, consulting
services and other business transactions arising in the ordinary
course of business. Where appropriate, we vigorously defend such
claims, lawsuits and proceedings. Some of these claims, lawsuits
and proceedings seek damages, including consequential, exemplary
or punitive damages, in amounts that could, if awarded, be
significant. Most of the claims, lawsuits and proceedings
arising in the ordinary course of business are covered by errors
and omissions insurance or other appropriate insurance. In terms
of deductibles associated with such insurance, we have
established provisions against these items, which are believed
to be adequate in light of current information and legal advice.
In accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies, if it is probable that an asset has
been impaired or a liability has been incurred as of the date of
the financial statements and the amount of loss is estimable, an
accrual is provided for the costs to resolve these claims in our
consolidated
47
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
financial statements. Period expenses related to the defense of
such claims are included in other operating expenses in the
accompanying consolidated statements of income. We, with the
assistance of outside counsel, adjust such provisions according
to new developments or changes in the strategy in dealing with
such matters. On the basis of current information, we do not
expect the outcome of the claims, lawsuits and proceedings to
which we are subject to, either individually, or in the
aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition. However, it is possible that future results of
operations or cash flows for any particular quarter or annual
period could be materially affected by an unfavorable resolution
of any such matters.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost over the fair value
of net assets of subsidiaries acquired and was
$119.0 million, or 6.6% of total assets, as of
December 31, 2008. As required by SFAS No. 142
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, we no
longer amortize goodwill and, at least annually, we test all
existing goodwill for impairment using a fair value approach, on
a reporting unit basis. Our annual assessment date for goodwill
impairment testing is October 1st. We test for impairment
more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate
that there may be an impairment to goodwill. Based on our most
recent evaluation of goodwill impairment, we determined that no
impairment of goodwill exists. Refer to Note 16
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets for further
discussion relating to our reporting units.
Deferred
Policy Acquisition Costs
Commissions and other costs of acquiring insurance business that
vary with and are primarily related to the production of new and
renewal business are deferred and amortized over the terms of
the policies or reinsurance treaties to which they relate.
Investment earnings are anticipated in determining the
recoverability of such deferred amounts. We reduce these costs
for premium deficiencies. There were no premium deficiencies for
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.
Federal
Income Taxes
We provide for federal income taxes based on amounts we believe
we ultimately will owe. Inherent in the provision for federal
income taxes are estimates regarding the deductibility of
certain items and the realization of certain tax credits. In the
event the ultimate deductibility of certain items or the
realization of certain tax credits differs from estimates, we
may be required to significantly change the provision for
federal income taxes recorded in the consolidated financial
statements. Any such change could significantly affect the
amounts reported in the consolidated statements of income.
We utilize the asset and liability method of accounting for
income tax. Under this method, deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their
respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit
carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured
using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in
the years in which those temporary differences are expected to
be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and
liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in
the period that includes the enactment date. Valuation
allowances are established when necessary to reduce the deferred
tax assets to the amounts more likely than not to be realized.
Results
of Operations
Executive
Overview
Over the last half of the year, there have been many
well-documented events that have occurred in the global economy
and financial markets, some of which adversely impacted our
results. Among those events was the impact on our investment
portfolio primarily because of impairments we recorded related
to certain
48
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
preferred stock investments, which primarily consisted of Fannie
Mae, Freddie Mac, and Lehman Brothers investments. In addition,
ProCenturys results since the consummation of the Merger
included property losses from Hurricanes Gustav and Ike. Despite
these unusual factors, our core operating results continue to be
favorable. Our results include the positive impact from
continued selective growth, coupled with adherence to strict
corporate underwriting guidelines, expense savings from the
elimination of the fronting fees paid prior to achievement of
our A.M. Best upgrade to A− (Excellent),
as well as a focus on current accident year price adequacy. In
addition, we continue to experience a favorable impact due to
the further leveraging of our fixed costs, which has helped
reduce our expense ratio. Our generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) combined ratio improved
2.1 percentage points to 93.3% in 2008 from 95.4% in 2007.
Net operating income, excluding amortization, increased
$15.3 million, or 51.3%, to $45.1 million, compared to
$29.8 million in 2007.
Gross written premium increased $111.2 million, or 32.1%,
to $457.7 million, compared to $346.5 million in 2007.
Included in this increase was $80.6 million in gross
written premiums related to ProCentury. Excluding the gross
written premiums related to ProCentury, the increase was
primarily the result of growth in new business from programs
implemented in late 2007 and early 2008. During the year, new
business written was $45.4 million. We anticipate further
growth into 2009 as the annualized premiums of these programs
continue to be realized. In addition, we continue to experience
selective growth within existing programs consistent with our
corporate underwriting guidelines and our controls over price
adequacy. Offsetting this growth was the loss of one program in
which our pricing and financial targets were higher than our
competition.
We believe that overall, the specialty insurance market will
continue to be competitive in 2009, but less than last year. We
continue to follow pricing guidelines mandated by our corporate
underwriting guidelines. Throughout 2008 we experienced
declining rates, and on average, Meadowbrooks rates were
down about 4%, while ProCenturys were down by about 6%. We
remain selective on new program implementation by focusing only
on those programs that meet our underwriting guidelines and have
a proven history of profitability.
We believe our actions in 2008 have set a solid foundation for
2009 and beyond, and we are excited about the ability to work
from a position of strength; strength of our balance sheet and
strength of our team. We believe that the market will begin to
firm, however we do not know when it will firm, and we view 2009
as a transition year for the industry. Our plans consider a
range of scenarios in 2009 with outcomes along a continuum that
includes market softening, a flat market and some firming to
hardening.
ProCentury
Merger
On July 31, 2008, we completed our Merger with ProCentury.
The total purchase price, as determined in accordance with GAAP,
was $227.2 million, of which $99.1 million consisted
of cash, $122.7 million in newly issued common stock, and
approximately $5.4 million in transaction related costs.
The total number of common shares issued for the stock portion
of the purchase price was approximately 21.1 million
shares. The purchase price was calculated based upon the
volume-weighted average sales price of a share of our common
stock for the
30-day
trading period ending the sixth trading day prior to completing
the Merger, or $5.7326. We financed the cash portion of the
Merger consideration with a combination of an $18.8 million
dividend from our insurance company subsidiary, Star Insurance
Company, available cash of $12.6 million, and loan proceeds
of approximately $67.8 million.
As of September 30, 2008, we recorded $48.8 million in
goodwill from the ProCentury merger. In addition, we recorded an
increase to other intangible assets of approximately
$21.0 million and $5.0 million related to agent
relationships and trade names, respectively.
As of December 31, 2008, we recorded an increase to
goodwill of $10.7 million from the ProCentury merger. This
increase was primarily related to a $9.1 million adjustment
to record a deferred tax liability
49
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
related to the other intangible assets related to the agent
relationships and the trade name. The remaining increase to
goodwill was primarily related to adjustments recorded to
reflect updated information on certain accruals and related
expenses as more refined information became available during our
fourth quarter review.
Since the completion of the Merger, we have been pleased with
the integration process. We are executing on several revenue
enhancement opportunities and leveraging the infrastructure as
summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
launching a new wholesale relationship in the Midwest;
|
|
|
|
fulfilling a surplus lines market need for an existing
workers compensation partner in New England;
|
|
|
|
expanding ProCentury products into states through our existing
admitted market capability;
|
|
|
|
capitalizing on enhanced business development capabilities by
having a more comprehensive risk management offering and shared
marketing platform;
|
|
|
|
reorganization and development of claims expertise in our
various offices;
|
|
|
|
generation of reinsurance cost savings due to the increased size
and diversity of the merged companies; and
|
|
|
|
providing a workers compensation market to select
qualified ProCentury wholesalers.
|
Other
Items
On January 31, 2008, we exercised our option to acquire the
remainder of the economics related to the acquisition of the
USSU business, by terminating the Management Agreement with the
former owners for a cash payment of $20.9 million. As a
result of this event, we recorded an increase to other
intangible assets of approximately $4.9 million and an
increase to goodwill of approximately $16.0 million.
On June 4, 2008, we announced the affirmation of
A.M. Best Companys financial strength rating of
A− (Excellent) for our Insurance Company
Subsidiaries.
2008
compared to 2007:
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2008, was
$27.4 million, or $0.61 per dilutive share, compared to net
income of $28.0 million, or $0.85 per dilutive share, for
the comparable period of 2007. Net operating income, a non-GAAP
measure, increased $10.9 million, or 39.2%, to
$38.8 million, or $0.86 per dilutive share, compared to net
operating income of $27.9 million, or $0.84 per dilutive
share for the comparable period in 2007, with lower weighted
average shares outstanding. Total weighted average shares
outstanding for the year ended December 31, 2008 were
44,995,712, compared to 33,101,965 for the comparable period in
2007. This increase in the weighted average shares is primarily
the result of the equity issued in connection with the
ProCentury merger, as well as a full year impact of the shares
issued in July 2007 related to our capital raise.
Net income for the year ended December 31, 2008, was
negatively impacted by after-tax realized losses of
$11.4 million, or $0.25 per diluted share, primarily as a
result of the other than temporary impairments in certain
preferred stock investments, which primarily related to Freddie
Mac, Fannie Mae, and Lehman Brothers investments, but also
included several corporate bonds and asset-backed and
mortgage-backed securities. In addition, net income for the year
includes the after-tax impact of the catastrophe losses related
to Hurricanes Gustav and Ike of $5.4 million, or $0.12 per
diluted share. In addition, net income included amortization
expense of $6.3 million, compared to $1.9 million in
2007. We have experienced improvements in our expense ratio as
we continue to benefit from the elimination of the fronting fees
associated with our prior use of an unaffiliated insurance
carriers A rated policy forms. Our expense
ratio also benefited by our ability to further leverage our
fixed costs in the management company. In addition, net
investment income
50
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
increased 38.7% to $36.6 million. Somewhat offsetting the
positive variables was a substantial increase in amortization
expense related to the acquisition of the USSU business in 2007.
In addition, amortization expense increased due to the other
intangibles recorded as a result of the ProCentury merger. We
continue to see favorable prior accident year reserve
development, as well as selective premium growth consistent with
our corporate underwriting guidelines and our controls over
price adequacy.
Revenues increased $97.1 million, or 28.5%, to
$437.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008,
from $340.7 million for the comparable period in 2007. This
increase reflects a $101.5 million increase in net earned
premiums, of which $80.6 million related to ProCentury.
Excluding the net earned premiums related to ProCentury, the
increase was primarily the result of overall growth within our
existing programs and new business we began underwriting in 2007
and 2008. Our overall net commissions and fees were down 6.7%,
or $3.1 million. This decrease was primarily the result of
a decrease in fees related to our New England-based programs,
caused by a decrease in premium volume due to reduced rates in
the self-insured markets on which the fees are based, because of
mandatory rate reductions and an increase in competition. In
addition, this decrease reflects slightly lower agency
commission revenue, which resulted from more competitive pricing
in certain jurisdictions. In 2008, we converted a portion of the
policies produced by USSU to our Insurance Company Subsidiaries.
The intercompany management fees associated with that portion of
the underwritten policies of the USSU business that we brought
in house were $2.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008. These fees are now eliminated upon
consolidation, thereby lowering net commissions and fees, but
not impacting overall consolidated results.
In addition, the revenues reflect a $10.2 million increase
in investment income, which primarily reflects the increase in
invested assets acquired in the ProCentury merger. The remaining
increase in investment income was partially the result of
overall positive cash flow and the net proceeds received from
our equity offering in July 2007. Slightly offsetting the
increases was the $11.4 million in realized losses,
primarily related to the other than temporary impairments
recorded in the last half of 2008, as previously indicated.
2007
compared to 2006:
Net income improved $6.0 million, or 27.0%, to
$28.0 million, or $0.85 per diluted share, in 2007, from
net income of $22.0 million, or $0.75 per diluted share, in
2006. This improvement primarily reflects growth in underwriting
profits and an increase in net investment income. Net investment
income increased primarily from an overall increase in average
invested assets. Improvements in our overall underwriting
results reflect continued favorable development on prior year
losses and a slight reduction in the expense ratio. These
improvements were partially offset by amortization of
intangibles and interest expense associated with our acquisition
of the USSU business.
Revenues increased $22.5 million, or 7.1%, to
$340.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2007,
from $318.2 million for the comparable period in 2006. This
increase reflects a $13.3 million, or 5.2%, increase in net
earned premiums. The increase in net earned premiums was the
result of selective growth consistent with our corporate
underwriting guidelines and our controls over price adequacy,
partially offset by a reduction in residual market premiums that
are assigned to us as a result of a decrease in the estimate of
the overall size of the residual market. The increase in revenue
was also due to an overall increase in fee-for-service revenue,
primarily as a result of our acquisition of the USSU business.
Total fees received in 2007 as a result of this acquisition were
$5.5 million. In addition, the increase in revenue reflects
a $4.3 million increase in investment income, primarily the
result of overall positive cash flow, a slight increase in yield
and to a lesser extent the cash received from our equity
offering in July 2007.
51
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
Specialty
Insurance Operations
The following table sets forth the revenues and results from
operations for our specialty insurance operations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earned premiums
|
|
$
|
369,721
|
|
|
$
|
268,197
|
|
|
$
|
254,920
|
|
Management fees
|
|
|
21,168
|
|
|
|
23,963
|
|
|
|
18,714
|
|
Claims fees
|
|
|
8,879
|
|
|
|
9,025
|
|
|
|
8,776
|
|
Loss control fees
|
|
|
2,069
|
|
|
|
2,151
|
|
|
|
2,216
|
|
Reinsurance placement
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
35,888
|
|
|
|
25,487
|
|
|
|
21,115
|
|
Net realized (losses) gains
|
|
|
(11,422
|
)
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
427,031
|
|
|
$
|
329,902
|
|
|
$
|
306,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty insurance operations
|
|
$
|
60,897
|
|
|
$
|
47,898
|
|
|
$
|
38,292
|
|
2008
compared to 2007:
Revenues from specialty insurance operations increased
$97.1 million, or 29.4%, to $427.0 million for the
year ended December 31, 2008, from $329.9 million for
the comparable period in 2007.
Net earned premiums increased $101.5 million, or 37.8%, to
$369.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008,
from $268.2 million in the comparable period in 2007. This
increase was primarily the result of $79.3 million in net
earned premiums related to ProCentury. Excluding the net earned
premiums related to ProCentury, net earned premiums increased
$22.2 million, or 8.3%. This increase was primarily the
result of overall growth within our existing programs and the
new business we began writing in 2007 and 2008, as well as
additional selective growth consistent with our corporate
underwriting guidelines and our controls over price adequacy.
Management fees decreased $2.8 million, or 11.7%, to
$21.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008,
from $24.0 in the comparable period in 2007. This decrease was
primarily the result of a decrease in fees related to our New
England-based programs, primarily caused by a decrease in
premium volume due to reduced rates in the self-insured markets
on which the fees are based, because of mandatory rate
reductions and an increase in competition.
Claim fees remained relatively flat for 2008 compared to 2007.
Net investment income increased $10.4 million, or 40.8%, to
$35.9 million in 2008, from $25.5 million in 2007.
This increase is primarily the result of $8.7 million in
net investment income related to ProCentury. Overall invested
assets increased due to the inclusion of ProCenturys
invested assets, from the Merger, which were $434.3 million
at December 31, 2008, coupled with the investing from
positive cash flows from operations. The positive cash flows
from operations were due to favorable underwriting results,
increased fee revenue, and the lengthening of the duration of
our reserves. The increase in the duration of our reserves
reflects the impact of growth in our excess liability business,
which was implemented at the end of 2003. This type of business
has a longer duration than the average reserves on our other
programs and is now a larger proportion of reserves. In
addition, the increase in average invested assets reflects cash
flows from our equity offering in July 2007. The average
investment yield for December 31, 2008 was 4.3%, compared
to 4.6% in 2007. The current pre-tax book yield was 4.4%. The
current after-tax book yield for the year ended
52
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
December 31, 2008 was 3.3%, compared to 3.4% in 2007. The
duration of the investment portfolio is 4.5 years at
December 31, 2008, compared to 4.3 years at
December 31, 2007.
Specialty insurance operations generated pre-tax income of
$60.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008,
compared to pre-tax income of $47.9 million for the
comparable period in 2007. This increase in pre-tax income
primarily demonstrates a continued improvement in underwriting
results including favorable reserve development on prior
accident years, selective growth in premium, adherence to our
strict underwriting guidelines, and our overall leveraging of
fixed costs. In addition, this improvement was also attributable
to an increase in net investment income. Partially offsetting
these improvements were the previously mentioned other than
temporary impairments recognized in the investment portfolio in
the last half of the year, which primarily related to securities
within the investment portfolio acquired with the Merger. In
addition, these improvements were also partially offset by the
impact of the losses incurred with the two hurricanes, as
mentioned above. The GAAP combined ratio was 93.3% for the year
ended December 31, 2008, compared to 95.4% for the same
period in 2007.
Net loss and loss adjustment expenses (LAE)
increased $61.9 million, or 41.0%, to $212.9 million
for the year ended December 31, 2008, from
$151.0 million for the same period in 2007. Our loss and
LAE ratio increased 0.8 percentage points to 62.0% in 2008,
from 61.2% for the same period in 2007. This ratio is the
unconsolidated net loss and LAE in relation to net earned
premiums. Net loss and LAE includes $49.2 million of net
loss and LAE expense related to ProCentury. In addition, the
loss and LAE ratio of 62.0% includes 2.3 percentage points
related to the previously mentioned catastrophe losses. The loss
and LAE ratio includes favorable development of
$16.8 million, or 4.5 percentage points, compared to
favorable development of $7.1 million, or
2.6 percentage points in 2007. The increase in our
favorable development in comparison to 2007 was primarily the
result of an increase in favorable development within our auto
liability and general liability lines of business due to lower
frequency and severity and better than expected claims results.
This was somewhat offset by an increase in adverse development
for an excess program. Additional discussion of our reserve
activity is described below within the Other Items
Reserves section.
Our expense ratio decreased 2.9 percentage points to 31.3%
for the year ended December 31, 2008, from 34.2% for the
same period in 2007. This ratio is the unconsolidated policy
acquisition and other underwriting expenses in relation to net
earned premiums. The decrease in our expense ratio reflects the
anticipated decrease in commission due to the elimination of the
fronting fees paid in 2007 to an unaffiliated insurance carrier
to use their A rated policy forms, which was
approximately 0.6 percentage points incurred in 2007,
compared to no costs in 2008. Despite a higher level of internal
fixed costs at ProCentury, we achieved a 0.5 percentage
point improvement on the expense ratio from leveraging the fixed
costs of the combined company. In addition, lower insurance
related assessments and a lower level of other underwriting
expenses, such as loss control and commissions relating to mix
of business also contributed to this improvement.
2007
compared to 2006:
Revenues from specialty insurance operations increased
$23.4 million, or 7.6%, to $329.9 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007, from $306.5 million for the
comparable period in 2006.
Net earned premiums increased $13.3 million, or 5.2%, to
$268.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007,
from $254.9 million in the comparable period in 2006. This
increase was the result of selective growth consistent with our
corporate underwriting guidelines and our controls over price
adequacy, partially offset by the reduction in residual market
premiums and mandatory rate decreases in the Nevada, Florida and
Massachusetts workers compensation lines of business.
Management fees increased $5.3 million, or 28.0%, to
$24.0 million, for the year ended December 31, 2007,
from $18.7 million for the comparable period in 2006. This
increase was related to fees received as a result of our
acquisition of the USSU business. Total fees received in 2007 as
a result of the USSU acquisition
53
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
were $5.5 million. Slightly offsetting these fees was a
slight decrease in fees in our Northeast operations. This
decrease in fees primarily related to a decrease in premium
volume due to reduced rates in the self-insured markets on which
the fees are based, because of mandatory rate reductions and an
increase in competition.
Claim fees remained relatively flat for 2007 compared to 2006.
Net investment income increased $4.4 million, or 20.7%, to
$25.5 million in 2007, from $21.1 million in 2006.
Average invested assets increased $79.2 million, or 16.0%,
to $573.1 million in 2007, from $493.9 million in
2006. The increase in average invested assets primarily relates
to the cash flows from operations, resulting from continued
favorable underwriting results, increased fee revenue, and the
lengthening of the duration of our reserves. The increase in the
duration of our reserves reflects the impact of growth in our
excess liability business, which was implemented at the end of
2003. This type of business has a longer duration than the
average reserves on our other programs and is now a larger
proportion of reserves. In addition, the increase in average
invested assets reflects cash flows from our equity offering in
July. The invested proceeds from the equity offering added
approximately $600,000 to the overall net investment income for
the year. The average investment yield for 2007 was 4.6%,
compared to 4.5% in 2006. The current pre-tax book yield was
4.5%. The current after-tax book yield was 3.4%, compared to
3.3% in 2006. This increase is primarily the result of the
increase in market interest rates, and the purchase of assets of
longer duration to take advantage of higher yields. The duration
of the investment portfolio is 4.3 years at
December 31, 2007, compared to 3.9 years at
December 31, 2006.
Specialty insurance operations generated pre-tax income of
$47.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007,
compared to pre-tax income of $38.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2006. This increase in pre-tax income
primarily reflects expansion of cash margins on our fee revenue,
an increase in net investment income, increased underwriting
profits, favorable development in prior accident year reserves,
and a slightly lower expense ratio. The GAAP combined ratio was
95.4% for the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to
96.8% for the comparable period in 2006.
Net losses and LAE increased $4.7 million, or 3.2%, to
$151.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2007,
from $146.3 million for the same period in 2006. Our loss
and LAE ratio improved 1.1 percentage points to 61.2% for
the year ended December 31, 2007, from 62.3% for the same
period in 2006. This ratio is the unconsolidated net loss and
LAE in relation to net earned premiums. This improvement
reflects the impact of overall favorable development on prior
accident year reserves of 1.5 percentage points from the
December 31, 2006 reserves. The improvement was primarily
within the workers compensation and professional liability
lines of business, partially offset by an increase in the
ultimate loss projections within the general liability line of
business. The unfavorable development within the general
liability line of business reflects a claim reserving process
change for an excess liability program.
Our expense ratio for the year ended December 31, 2007 was
34.2%, compared to 34.5% in 2006. This ratio is the
unconsolidated policy acquisition and other underwriting
expenses in relation to net earned premiums.
Agency
Operations
The following table sets forth the revenues and results from
operations from our agency operations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net commission
|
|
$
|
11,064
|
|
|
$
|
11,316
|
|
|
$
|
12,285
|
|
Pre-tax income(1)
|
|
$
|
1,142
|
|
|
$
|
2,087
|
|
|
$
|
2,609
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Our agency operations include an
allocation of corporate overhead, which includes expenses
associated with accounting, information services, legal, and
other corporate services. The corporate overhead allocation
excludes those expenses specific to the holding company. For the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, the
allocation of corporate overhead to the agency operations
segment was $2.8 million, $2.8 million, and
$3.3 million, respectively.
|
54
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
2008
compared to 2007:
Revenue from agency operations, which consists primarily of
agency commission revenue, decreased $252,000, or 2.2%, to
$11.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008,
from $11.3 million for the comparable period in 2007. This
decrease primarily reflects regional competition and a softer
insurance market within our mid to larger Michigan accounts and
isolated competitive pricing pressure in the California
automobile market.
Agency operations generated pre-tax income, after the allocation
of corporate overhead, of $1.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008, compared to $2.1 million for the
comparable period in 2007. The decrease in the pre-tax income is
primarily attributable to the decrease in agency commission
revenue mentioned above.
2007
compared to 2006:
Revenue from agency operations, which consists primarily of
agency commission revenue, decreased $969,000, or 7.9%, to
$11.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2007,
from $12.3 million for the comparable period in 2006. This
decrease was primarily the result of a reduction in premium on
client renewals due to a more competitive pricing environment
primarily on larger Michigan accounts.
Agency operations generated pre-tax income, after the allocation
of corporate overhead, of $2.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007, compared to $2.6 million for the
comparable period in 2006. The decrease in the pre-tax income
was primarily attributable to the decrease in agency commission
revenue mentioned above.
Other
Items
Reserves
At December 31, 2008, our best estimate for the ultimate
liability for loss and LAE reserves, net of reinsurance
recoverables, was $625.3 million. We established a
reasonable range of reserves of approximately
$570.0 million to $663.7 million. This range was
established primarily by considering the various indications
derived from standard actuarial techniques and other appropriate
reserve considerations. The following table sets forth this
range by line of business (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Reserve
|
|
|
Maximum Reserve
|
|
|
|
|
Line of Business
|
|
Range
|
|
|
Range
|
|
|
Selected Reserves
|
|
|
Workers Compensation(1)
|
|
$
|
160,511
|
|
|
$
|
177,804
|
|
|
$
|
171,797
|
|
Commercial Multiple Peril/General Liability
|
|
|
281,989
|
|
|
|
342,828
|
|
|
|
317,188
|
|
Commercial Automobile
|
|
|
86,900
|
|
|
|
97,134
|
|
|
|
92,788
|
|
Other
|
|
|
40,587
|
|
|
|
45,893
|
|
|
|
43,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Reserves
|
|
$
|
569,987
|
|
|
$
|
663,659
|
|
|
$
|
625,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes residual markets
|
Reserves are reviewed by our internal actuaries for adequacy on
a quarterly basis. When reviewing reserves, we analyze
historical data and estimate the impact of numerous factors such
as (1) per claim information; (2) industry and our
historical loss experience; (3) legislative enactments,
judicial decisions, legal developments in the imposition of
damages, and changes in political attitudes; and (4) trends
in general economic conditions, including the effects of
inflation. This process assumes that past experience, adjusted
for
55
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
the effects of current developments and anticipated trends, is
an appropriate basis for predicting future events. There is no
precise method for subsequently evaluating the impact of any
specific factor on the adequacy of reserves, because the
eventual deficiency or redundancy is affected by multiple
factors.
The key assumptions used in our selection of ultimate reserves
included the underlying actuarial methodologies, a review of
current pricing and underwriting initiatives, an evaluation of
reinsurance costs and retention levels, and a detailed claims
analysis with an emphasis on how aggressive claims handling may
be impacting the paid and incurred loss data trends embedded in
the traditional actuarial methods. With respect to the ultimate
estimates for losses and LAE, the key assumptions remained
consistent for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and
2006.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, we reported a
decrease in net ultimate loss estimates for accident years 2007
and prior of $16.8 million, or 2.8% of $589.3 million
of net loss and LAE reserves, which include $341.5 million
of Meadowbrook net loss and LAE reserves at December 31,
2007 and $247.7 million of ProCentury net loss and LAE
reserves at August 1, 2008. The decrease in net ultimate
loss estimates reflected revisions in the estimated reserves as
a result of actual claims activity in calendar year 2008 that
differed from the projected activity. There were no significant
changes in the key assumptions utilized in the analysis and
calculations of our reserves during 2007 and 2008. The major
components of this change in ultimate loss estimates are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves at
|
|
|
Reserves at
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Incurred Losses(1)
|
|
|
Paid Losses(1)
|
|
|
Reserves at
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
August 1,
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Prior
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Prior
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Line of Business
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Incurred
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Paid
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Workers Compensation
|
|
$
|
141,359
|
|
|
$
|
3,259
|
|
|
$
|
144,618
|
|
|
$
|
62,753
|
|
|
$
|
(12,710
|
)
|
|
$
|
50,043
|
|
|
$
|
8,877
|
|
|
$
|
37,971
|
|
|
$
|
46,848
|
|
|
$
|
147,813
|
|
Residual Markets
|
|
|
25,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,428
|
|
|
|
7,749
|
|
|
|
(2,739
|
)
|
|
|
5,010
|
|
|
|
2,319
|
|
|
|
4,135
|
|
|
|
6,454
|
|
|
|
23,984
|
|
Commercial Multiple Peril / General Liability
|
|
|
87,812
|
|
|
|
203,613
|
|
|
|
291,425
|
|
|
|
64,555
|
|
|
|
7,293
|
|
|
|
71,848
|
|
|
|
3,325
|
|
|
|
42,760
|
|
|
|
46,085
|
|
|
|
317,188
|
|
Commercial Automobile
|
|
|
69,426
|
|
|
|
17,234
|
|
|
|
86,660
|
|
|
|
52,660
|
|
|
|
(5,166
|
)
|
|
|
47,494
|
|
|
|
14,148
|
|
|
|
27,218
|
|
|
|
41,366
|
|
|
|
92,788
|
|
Other
|
|
|
17,516
|
|
|
|
23,633
|
|
|
|
41,149
|
|
|
|
41,940
|
|
|
|
(3,450
|
)
|
|
|
38,490
|
|
|
|
28,245
|
|
|
|
7,836
|
|
|
|
36,081
|
|
|
|
43,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Reserves
|
|
|
341,541
|
|
|
|
247,739
|
|
|
|
589,280
|
|
|
$
|
229,657
|
|
|
$
|
(16,772
|
)
|
|
$
|
212,885
|
|
|
$
|
56,914
|
|
|
$
|
119,920
|
|
|
$
|
176,834
|
|
|
|
625,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance Recoverable
|
|
|
198,461
|
|
|
|
41,793
|
|
|
|
240,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
540,002
|
|
|
$
|
289,532
|
|
|
$
|
829,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
885,697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re-estimated
|
|
|
Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves at
|
|
|
as a
|
|
|
|
Reserves at
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
at August 1,
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
2008 on
|
|
|
Prior Year
|
|
Line of Business
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
Prior Years(1)
|
|
|
Reserves
|
|
|
Workers Compensation
|
|
$
|
141,359
|
|
|
$
|
3,259
|
|
|
$
|
144,618
|
|
|
$
|
131,908
|
|
|
|
(8.8
|
)%
|
Commercial Multiple Peril/General Liability
|
|
|
87,812
|
|
|
|
203,613
|
|
|
|
291,425
|
|
|
|
298,718
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
Commercial Automobile
|
|
|
69,426
|
|
|
|
17,234
|
|
|
|
86,660
|
|
|
|
81,494
|
|
|
|
(6.0
|
)%
|
Other
|
|
|
17,516
|
|
|
|
23,633
|
|
|
|
41,149
|
|
|
|
37,699
|
|
|
|
(8.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total
|
|
|
316,113
|
|
|
|
247,739
|
|
|
|
563,852
|
|
|
|
549,819
|
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)%
|
Residual Markets
|
|
|
25,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,428
|
|
|
|
22,689
|
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Reserves
|
|
$
|
341,541
|
|
|
$
|
247,739
|
|
|
$
|
589,280
|
|
|
$
|
572,508
|
|
|
|
(2.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Paid and incurred loss and LAE
activity includes that related to ProCentury of
$247.7 million of net loss and LAE reserves added at
August 1, 2008. Therefore, incurred and paid loss and LAE
activity on these reserves do not constitute a full calendar
year.
|
Workers
Compensation Excluding Residual Markets
The projected net ultimate loss estimate for the workers
compensation line of business excluding residual markets
decreased $12.7 million, or 8.8% of net workers
compensation reserves. This net overall decrease reflects
decreases of $5.5 million, $3.3 million,
$1.8 million and $747,000 in accident years 2006, 2005,
2004 and 2001, respectively. The decreases reflect better than
expected experience for many of our workers compensation
programs, including a Nevada, Florida, and a countrywide
association program. Actual losses reported during the quarter
were less than expected given the prior actuarial assumptions.
The change in ultimate loss estimates for all other accident
years was insignificant.
Commercial
Multiple Peril and General Liability
The commercial multiple peril line and general liability line of
business had an increase in net ultimate loss estimates of
$7.3 million, or 2.5% of net commercial multiple peril and
general liability reserves. The net increase reflects increases
of $1.7 million, $1.5 million, $2.8 million,
$877,000 and $1.7 million in the ultimate loss estimates
for accident years 2006, 2005, 2004, 2000 and 1995,
respectively. These increases were due to greater than expected
claim emergence in two discontinued programs, an excess
liability program, and a contractors business program.
These increases were offset by decreases in the net ultimate
loss estimates of $1.2 million and $739,000 for accident
years 2007 and 1997, respectively. The decreases in the net
ultimate loss estimates for these accident years were due to
better than expected claim emergence in a contractors
business program and ProCentury liability business. The change
in ultimate loss estimates for all other accident years was
insignificant.
Commercial
Automobile
The projected net ultimate loss estimate for the commercial
automobile line of business decreased $5.2 million, or 6.0%
of net commercial automobile reserves. This net overall decrease
reflects decreases of $2.8 million, $2.5 million and
$501,000 in accident years 2007, 2006, and 2004, respectively.
These decreases primarily reflect better than expected case
reserve development on two California-based programs. These
decreases were offset by an increase in the net ultimate loss
estimates of $853,000 for accident year 2005 due to greater than
expected claim emergence in a California-based program and an
excess liability program. The change in ultimate loss estimates
for all other accident years was insignificant.
57
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
Other
The projected net ultimate loss estimate for the other lines of
business decreased $3.5 million, or 8.4% of net reserves.
This net decrease reflects reductions of $2.1 million and
$2.2 million in net ultimate loss estimate for accident
years 2007 and 2006, respectively. These decreases are primarily
due to better than expected case reserve development during the
calendar year in a professional liability program. The change in
ultimate loss estimates for all other accident years was
insignificant.
Residual
Markets
The workers compensation residual market line of business
had a decrease in net ultimate loss estimate of
$2.7 million, or 10.8% of net reserves. This decrease
reflects reductions of $404,000, $916,000 and $1.1 million
in accident years 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. We record
loss reserves as reported by the National Council on
Compensation Insurance (NCCI), plus a provision for
the reserves incurred but not yet analyzed and reported to us
due to a two quarter lag in reporting. These changes reflect a
difference between our estimate of the lag incurred but not
reported and the amounts reported by the NCCI in the year. The
change in ultimate loss estimates for all other accident years
was insignificant.
Salaries
and Employee Benefits
Salaries and employee benefits increased $6.4 million, or
11.4%, to $62.9 million in 2008, from $56.4 million in
2007. Included in the $62.9 million were salaries and
employee benefits related to ProCentury of $9.1 million.
Excluding the salaries and employee benefits related to
ProCentury, overall salaries and employee benefits would have
decreased $2.6 million. This decrease primarily reflects a
decrease in variable compensation. The decrease in variable
compensation, in comparison to 2007, reflects the increase in
our targeted measure for earning variable compensation. In
addition, this decrease was the result of a decrease in profit
sharing commissions. The decrease in profit sharing commissions
was the result of our purchase of an excess liability book of
business. As a result of us owning the book of business, we no
longer pay the profit sharing commissions.
Salaries and employee benefits increased $1.8 million, or
3.4%, to $56.4 million in 2007, from $54.6 million for
the comparable period in 2006. This increase was primarily due
to merit increases, our acquisition of the USSU business, and
variable compensation attributable to our performance. Overall,
our headcount remained flat for 2007.
Additional discussion of our variable compensation plan is
described below under Variable Compensation.
Other
Administrative Expenses
Other administrative expenses increased $2.7 million, or
8.4%, to $35.0 million, from $32.3 million in 2007.
This increase was primarily the result of slight increases in
various general operating expenses, primarily due to the Merger
with ProCentury. Partially offsetting this increase was a
reduction in the management fee previously associated with our
acquisition of USSU. In January 2008, we exercised our option to
purchase the remainder of the economics related to the
acquisition of the USSU business, by terminating the Management
Agreement with the former owners, thereby eliminating the
management fee associated with the Management Agreement.
Other administrative expenses increased $3.5 million, or
12.0%, to $32.3 million in 2007, from $28.8 million in
2006. Other administrative expenses increased in comparison to
2006 as a result of our acquisition of the USSU business,
primarily due to the management fee associated with this
acquisition. In addition, this increase was the result of
information technology initiatives. Offsetting the increases
related to
58
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
the USSU business were decreases related to policyholder
dividends, as well as various decreases in other general
operating expenses in comparison to 2006.
Salaries and employee benefits and other administrative expenses
include both corporate overhead and the holding company expenses
included in the non-allocated expenses of our segment
information.
Amortization
Expense
Amortization expense for 2008, 2007, and 2006 was
$6.3 million, $1.9 million, and $590,000,
respectively. Amortization expense per dilutive share for 2007,
2006, and 2005 was $0.14, $0.06, and $0.02, respectively. The
increase in amortization expense primarily relates to the
customer relationships acquired with the USSU business and the
excess liability book of business acquired in late 2007. In
addition, the increase in 2008 was also due to the amortization
expense associated with the other intangibles recorded as a
result of the ProCentury merger, related to the agent
relationships and trade names.
Interest
Expense
Interest expense for 2008, 2007, and 2006 was $7.7 million,
$6.0 million, and $6.0 million, respectively. Interest
expense is primarily attributable to our debentures, which are
described within the Liquidity and Capital Resources
section of Managements Discussion and Analysis, as well as
our line of credit and term loan. The overall increase in 2008
compared to 2007, primarily relates to interest expense related
to the term loan we used to finance a portion of the purchase
price for the ProCentury merger. In addition, the increase is
partially due to the interest related to the trust preferred
debt instruments acquired with the Merger. The average interest
rate for the year ended December 31, 2008 was 7.13%,
compared to 8.67% in 2007. This decrease reflects the impact of
a lower cost of debt associated with the term loan, which had an
average interest rate of 5.95% in 2008. The average interest
rate in 2007 was 8.67%, which primarily related to the
debentures.
Interest expense for 2007 includes interest related to a
temporary increase in our line of credit, which was associated
with borrowings to fund the cash portion of the USSU business
acquisition. Upon receipt of the net proceeds from our capital
raise in July 2007, we reduced this outstanding balance to zero.
The average interest rate for the year ended December 31,
2007 was 8.67%, compared to 8.48% in 2006.
Income
Taxes
Income tax expense, which includes both federal and state taxes,
for 2008, 2007 and 2006, was $16.7 million,
$11.7 million, and $9.6 million, or 38.1%, 29.8% and
30.5% of income before taxes, respectively. The increase in the
effective tax rate from 2007 to 2008 reflects the impact of
establishing a valuation allowance for the previously mentioned
other than temporary impairments. Excluding, the impact of these
impairments and the related tax valuation, the effective tax
rate would have been 30.2%. This increase reflects the impact of
a higher contribution of underwriting income to pre-tax income
and a lower contribution of net investment income in 2008,
compared to 2007. Investment income represented 83.6% of pre-tax
income for 2008, compared to 67.0% in 2007. This change in
proportion reflects the improved underwriting results in 2008,
compared to 2007.
The decrease in the effective tax rate from 2006 to 2007
primarily reflects a higher level of tax exempt securities in
our investment portfolio, slightly offset by a higher level of
income within our fee-based operations, which are taxed at a 35%
rate.
Other
Than Temporary Impairments
Our policy for the valuation of temporarily impaired securities
is to determine impairment based on analysis of the following
factors: (1) rating downgrade or other credit event (e.g.,
failure to pay interest when due); (2) financial condition
and near-term prospects of the issuer, including any specific
events which may
59
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
influence the operations of the issuer such as changes in
technology or discontinuance of a business segment;
(3) prospects for the issuers industry segment; and
(4) our intent and ability to retain the investment for a
period of time sufficient to allow for anticipated recovery in
fair value. We evaluate our investments in securities to
determine other than temporary impairment, no less than
quarterly. Investments that are deemed other than temporarily
impaired are written down to their estimated net fair value and
the related losses recognized in operations.
After review of our investment portfolio in relation to our
policy, we recorded a pre-tax realized loss of
$11.7 million, for the year ended December 31, 2008,
related to certain preferred stock investments, including Fannie
Mae, Freddie Mac, and Lehman Brothers investments, as well as
several corporate bonds and asset-backed and mortgage-backed
securities.
At December 31, 2008, we had 365 securities that were in an
unrealized loss position. At December 31, 2008,
twenty-three of those investments, with an aggregate fair value
of $24.5 million and $3.7 million unrealized loss,
have been in an unrealized loss position for more than twelve
months. Positive evidence considered, where applicable, in
reaching our conclusion that the investments in an unrealized
loss position are not other than temporarily impaired consisted
of: 1) there were no specific credit events which caused
concerns; 2) there were no past due interest payments;
3) our ability and intent to retain the investment for a
sufficient amount of time to allow an anticipated recovery in
value; and 4) changes in fair value were considered normal
in relation to overall fluctuations in interest rates.
For additional information regarding our other than temporary
impairments and their fair value and amount of unrealized losses
segregated by the time period the investment has been in an
unrealized loss position, please refer to
Note 3 Investments.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Our principal sources of funds are insurance premiums,
investment income, proceeds from the maturity and sale of
invested assets from our Insurance Company Subsidiaries, and
risk management fees and agency commissions from our
non-regulated subsidiaries. Funds are primarily used for the
payment of claims, commissions, salaries and employee benefits,
other operating expenses, shareholder dividends, share
repurchases, and debt service.
A significant portion of our consolidated assets represents
assets of our Insurance Company Subsidiaries that may not be
transferable to the holding company in the form of dividends,
loans or advances. The restriction on the transferability to the
holding company from our Insurance Company Subsidiaries is
limited by regulatory guidelines. These guidelines generally
specify that dividends can be paid only from unassigned surplus
and only to the extent that all dividends in the current twelve
months do not exceed the greater of 10% of total statutory
surplus as of the end of the prior fiscal year or 100% of the
statutory net income for the prior year. Using these criteria,
the available ordinary dividend available to be paid from the
Insurance Company Subsidiaries during 2008 is
$46.2 million. The Insurance Company Subsidiaries, which
include the insurance companies acquired in the ProCentury
merger, paid ordinary dividends of $46.2 million in 2008.
In 2009, the Insurance Company Subsidiaries have the capacity to
pay ordinary dividends of $39.5 million without prior
regulatory approval. In addition to ordinary dividends, the
Insurance Company Subsidiaries have the capacity to pay
$31.1 million of extraordinary dividends with prior
regulatory approval. The Insurance Company Subsidiaries
ability to pay future dividends without advance regulatory
approval is dependent upon maintaining a positive level of
unassigned surplus, which in turn, is dependent upon the
Insurance Company Subsidiaries generating net income. No
statutory dividends were paid from our Insurance Company
Subsidiaries during 2007.
We also generate operating cash flow from non-regulated
subsidiaries in the form of commission revenue, outside
management fees, and intercompany management fees. These sources
of income are used to meet debt service, shareholders
dividends, and other operating expenses of the holding company
and non-regulated
60
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
subsidiaries. Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and
amortization from non-regulated subsidiaries were approximately
$14.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.
These earnings were available for debt service.
We have a line of credit totaling $35.0 million, of which
there was no outstanding balance at December 31, 2008. The
undrawn portion of the revolving credit facility is available to
finance working capital and for general corporate purposes,
including but not limited to, surplus contributions to our
Insurance Company Subsidiaries to support premium growth or
strategic acquisitions.
Cash flow provided by operations was $100.9 million,
$88.6 million, and $74.3 million in 2008, 2007, and
2006, respectively. The increase in cash from operations
reflects growth in underwriting profits, the increase in
duration of our reserves, and growth in net investment income.
Other
Items
Debentures
The following table summarizes the principal amounts and
variables associated with our debentures (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
Year of
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate at
|
|
Principal
|
|
Issuance
|
|
Description
|
|
Callable
|
|
|
Year Due
|
|
|
Interest Rate Terms
|
|
12/31/08(1)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2003
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2033
|
|
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 4.05%
|
|
|
5.51
|
%
|
|
$
|
10,310
|
|
2004
|
|
Senior debentures
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2034
|
|
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 4.00%
|
|
|
6.15
|
%
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
2004
|
|
Senior debentures
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2034
|
|
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 4.20%
|
|
|
6.35
|
%
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
2005
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2035
|
|
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 3.58%
|
|
|
5.58
|
%
|
|
|
20,620
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures(2)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2032
|
|
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 4.00%
|
|
|
6.21
|
%
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures(2)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2033
|
|
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 4.10%
|
|
|
6.25
|
%
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
80,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The underlying three-month LIBOR
rate varies as a result of the interest rate reset dates used in
determining the three-month LIBOR rate, which varies for each
long-term debt item each quarter.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Represents the junior subordinated
debentures acquired in conjunction with the Merger.
|
We received a total of $53.3 million in net proceeds from
the issuances of the above long-term debt, of which
$26.2 million was contributed to the surplus of our
Insurance Company Subsidiaries and the remaining balance was
used for general corporate purposes. Associated with the
issuance of the above long-term debt we incurred approximately
$1.7 million in issuance costs for commissions paid to the
placement agents in the transactions.
The issuance costs associated with these debentures have been
capitalized and are included in other assets on the balance
sheet. As of June 30, 2007, these issuance costs were being
amortized over a seven year period as a component of interest
expense. The seven year amortization period represented
managements best estimate of the estimated useful life of
the bonds related to both the senior debentures and junior
subordinated debentures. Beginning July 1, 2007, we
reevaluated our best estimate and determined a five year
amortization period to be a more accurate representation of the
estimated useful life. Therefore, this change in amortization
period from seven years to five years has been applied
prospectively beginning July 1, 2007.
61
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
The junior subordinated debentures issued in 2003 and 2005, were
issued in conjunction with the issuance of $10.0 million
and $20.0 million in mandatory redeemable trust preferred
securities to a trust formed by an institutional investor from
our unconsolidated subsidiary trusts, respectively.
In relation to the junior subordinated debentures acquired in
conjunction with the Merger, we also acquired the remaining
unamortized portion of the capitalized issuance costs associated
with these debentures. The remaining unamortized portion of the
issuance costs we acquired was $625,000. These are included in
other assets on the balance sheet. The remaining balance is
being amortized over a five year period beginning August 1,
2008, as a component of interest expense.
Interest
Rate Swaps
We have entered into interest rate swap transactions to mitigate
our interest rate risk on our existing debt obligations. We
accrue for these transactions in accordance with
SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, as subsequently
amended. These interest rate swap transactions have been
designated as cash flow hedges and are deemed highly effective
hedges under SFAS No. 133. In accordance with
SFAS No. 133, these interest rate swap transactions
are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet and the
effective portion of the changes in fair value are accounted for
within other comprehensive income. The interest differential to
be paid or received is accrued and recognized as an adjustment
to interest expense.
The following table summarizes the rates and amounts associated
with our interest rate swaps (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Amount at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Counterparty Interest
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Effective Date
|
|
Expiration Date
|
|
Debt Instrument
|
|
Rate Terms
|
|
Fixed Rate
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
10/06/2005
|
|
05/24/2009
|
|
Senior debentures
|
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 4.20%
|
|
|
8.925
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
10/06/2005
|
|
09/16/2010
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 3.58%
|
|
|
8.340
|
%
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
04/23/2008
|
|
05/24/2011
|
|
Senior debentures
|
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 4.20%
|
|
|
7.720
|
%
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
04/23/2008
|
|
06/30/2013
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 4.05%
|
|
|
8.020
|
%
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
04/29/2008
|
|
04/29/2013
|
|
Senior debentures
|
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 4.00%
|
|
|
7.940
|
%
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
07/31/2008
|
|
07/31/2013
|
|
Term loan(1)
|
|
Three-month LIBOR
|
|
|
3.950
|
%
|
|
|
60,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08/15/2008
|
|
08/15/2013
|
|
debentures(2)
|
|
Three-month LIBOR
|
|
|
3.780
|
%
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
09/04/2008
|
|
09/04/2013
|
|
debentures(2)
|
|
Three-month LIBOR
|
|
|
3.790
|
%
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Relates to our term loan, which has
an effective date of July 31, 2008 and an expiration date
of July 31, 2013. We are required to make fixed rate
interest payments on the current balance of the term loan,
amortizing in accordance with the term loan amortization
schedule. We fixed only the variable interest portion of the
loan. The actual interest payments associated with the term loan
also include an additional rate of 2.00% in accordance with the
credit agreement, as of December 31, 2008.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Relates to the debentures acquired
from the ProCentury merger. We fixed only the variable interest
portion of the debt. The actual interest payments associated
with the debentures also include an additional rate of 4.10% and
4.00% on the $10.0 million and $15.0 million
debentures, respectively.
|
62
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
In relation to the above interest rate swaps, the net interest
expense incurred for the year ended December 31, 2008, was
approximately $763,000. The net interest income received for the
years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, was approximately
$172,000 and $67,000, respectively.
The total fair value of the interest rate swaps as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007 was approximately
($8.9 million) and ($545,000), respectively. Accumulated
other comprehensive income at December 31, 2008 and 2007,
included an accumulated loss on the cash flow hedge, net of
taxes, of approximately $5.5 million and $484,000,
respectively.
Credit
Facilities
On July 31, 2008, we executed $100 million in senior
credit facilities (the Credit Facilities). The
Credit Facilities included a $65.0 million term loan
facility, which was fully funded upon the closing of our Merger
with ProCentury and a $35.0 million revolving credit
facility, which was partially funded upon closing of the Merger.
As of December 31, 2008, the outstanding balance on our
term loan facility was $60.25 million. We did not have an
outstanding balance on our revolving credit facility as of
December 31, 2008. The undrawn portion of the revolving
credit facility is available to finance working capital and for
general corporate purposes, including but not limited to,
surplus contributions to our Insurance Company Subsidiaries to
support premium growth or strategic acquisitions. These Credit
Facilities replaced our prior revolving credit agreement, which
was terminated upon the execution of the Credit Facilities. At
December 31, 2007, we did not have an outstanding balance
on our former revolving line of credit.
The principal amount outstanding under the Credit Facilities
provides for interest at LIBOR, plus the applicable margin, or
at our option, the base rate. The base rate is defined as the
higher of the lending banks prime rate or the Federal
Funds rate, plus 0.50%, plus the applicable margin. The
applicable margin is determined by the consolidated indebtedness
to consolidated total capital ratio. In addition, the Credit
Facilities provide for an unused facility fee ranging between
twenty basis points and forty basis points, based on our
consolidated leverage ratio as defined by the Credit Facilities.
At December 31, 2008, the interest rate on our term loan
was 5.95%, which consisted of the fixed rate of 3.95%, plus an
applicable margin of 2.00%.
The debt covenants applicable to the Credit Facilities consist
of: (1) minimum consolidated net worth starting at eighty
percent of pro forma consolidated net worth after giving effect
to the acquisition of ProCentury, with quarterly increases
thereafter, (2) minimum Risk Based Capital Ratio for Star
of 1.75 to 1.00, (3) maximum permitted consolidated
leverage ratio of 0.35 to 1.00, (4) minimum consolidated
debt service coverage ratio of 1.25 to 1.00, and
(5) minimum A.M. Best rating of B++. As of
December 31, 2008, we were in compliance with these debt
covenants.
Investment
Portfolio
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, the recorded values of
our investment portfolio, including cash and cash equivalents,
were $1.1 billion and $651.6 million, respectively.
Total invested assets included $434.3 million related to
ProCentury.
We believe our overall investment portfolio exhibits
appropriately conservative characteristics. The duration on the
investment portfolio at December 31, 2008 is
4.5 years, compared to 4.3 years at December 31,
2007. Our pre-tax book yield is 4.4%. The current after-tax
yield is 3.3%, compared to 3.4% in 2007. Approximately 98.7% of
our fixed income investment portfolio is investment grade.
Shareholders
Equity
At December 31, 2008, shareholders equity was
$438.2 million, or a book value of $7.64 per common share,
compared to $301.9 million, or a book value of $8.16 per
common share, at December 31, 2007. In
63
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
conjunction with the share consideration portion of the purchase
price, we issued 21.1 million shares, or
$122.7 million of new equity.
At our board meeting on July 25, 2008, our Board of
Directors authorized us to purchase up to 3,000,000 shares
of our common stock in market transactions for a period not to
exceed twenty-four months. This share repurchase plan replaced
the existing share repurchase plan authorized in October 2007.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, we purchased and
retired 800,000 shares of common stock for a total cost of
approximately $4.9 million. We did not repurchase any
common stock during 2007.
Cash dividends paid to common shareholders totaled
$3.8 million in 2008. Dividends to common shareholders were
not paid in 2007 or 2006. On February 13, 2009, our Board
of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per common
share. The dividend is payable on March 30, 2009, to
shareholders of record as of March 13, 2009.
When evaluating the declaration of a dividend, our Board of
Directors considers a variety of factors, including but not
limited to, cash flow, liquidity needs, results of operations,
industry conditions, overall financial condition and other
relevant factors. As a holding company, the ability to pay cash
dividends is partially dependent on dividends and other
permitted payments from our Insurance Company Subsidiaries.
ProCentury
Merger
Following the close of business on July 31, 2008, our
Merger with ProCentury was completed. In accordance with the
Merger Agreement, the stock price used in determining the final
cash and share consideration portion of the purchase price was
based on the volume-weighted average sales price of a share of
Meadowbrook common stock for the
30-day
trading period ending on the sixth trading day before the
completion of the Merger, or $5.7326. Based upon the final
proration, the total purchase price was $227.2 million, of
which $99.1 million consisted of cash, $122.7 million
in newly issued common stock, and approximately
$5.4 million in transaction related costs. The total number
of new common shares issued for purposes of the stock portion of
the purchase price was 21.1 million shares.
The Merger was accounted for under the purchase method of
accounting, which resulted in goodwill of $48.8 million
equaling the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of
identifiable assets. Goodwill is not amortized, but is subject
to at least annual impairment testing. Identifiable intangibles
of $21.0 million and $5.0 million were recorded
related to agent relationships and trade names, respectively.
As of December 31, 2008, we recorded an increase to
goodwill of $10.7 million. This increase was primarily
related to a $9.1 million adjustment on the holding company
to a deferred tax liability related to the other intangible
assets related to the agent relationships and the trade name.
The remaining increase to goodwill was primarily related to
adjustments recorded to reflect updated information on certain
accruals and related expenses as more refined information became
available during the fourth quarter of 2008.
USSU
Acquisition
Effective January 31, 2008, we exercised our option to
purchase the remainder of the economics related to the
acquisition of the USSU business in April 2007, by terminating
the Management Agreement for a payment of $20.9 million. As
a result, we recorded an increase to other intangible assets of
approximately $4.9 million and an increase to goodwill of
approximately $16.0 million.
64
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
Adjusted
Expense Ratio
Included in our GAAP expense ratio is the impact of the margin
associated with our fee-based operations. If the profit margin
from our fee-for-service business is recognized as an offset to
our underwriting expense, a more realistic picture of our
operating efficiency emerges. The following table illustrates
our adjusted expense ratio, which reflects the GAAP expense
ratio of our insurance company subsidiaries, net of the pre-tax
profit, excluding investment income, of our fee-for-service and
agency subsidiaries (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net earned premiums
|
|
$
|
369,721
|
|
|
$
|
268,197
|
|
|
$
|
254,920
|
|
Less: Consolidated net loss and LAE
|
|
|
212,885
|
|
|
|
150,969
|
|
|
|
146,293
|
|
Intercompany claim fees
|
|
|
16,296
|
|
|
|
13,058
|
|
|
|
12,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unconsolidated net loss and LAE
|
|
|
229,181
|
|
|
|
164,027
|
|
|
|
158,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated policy acquisition and other underwriting expenses
|
|
|
69,349
|
|
|
|
53,717
|
|
|
|
50,479
|
|
Intercompany administrative and other underwriting fees
|
|
|
46,371
|
|
|
|
37,890
|
|
|
|
37,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unconsolidated policy acquisition and other underwriting expenses
|
|
|
115,720
|
|
|
|
91,607
|
|
|
|
87,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting income
|
|
$
|
24,820
|
|
|
$
|
12,563
|
|
|
$
|
8,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP combined ratio as reported
|
|
|
93.3
|
%
|
|
|
95.4
|
%
|
|
|
96.8
|
%
|
Specialty risk management operations pre-tax income
|
|
$
|
60,897
|
|
|
$
|
47,898
|
|
|
$
|
38,292
|
|
Less: Underwriting income
|
|
|
24,820
|
|
|
|
12,563
|
|
|
|
8,153
|
|
Net investment income and realized (losses) gains
|
|
|
25,202
|
|
|
|
26,550
|
|
|
|
22,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee-based operations pre-tax income
|
|
|
10,875
|
|
|
|
8,785
|
|
|
|
7,995
|
|
Agency operations pre-tax income
|
|
|
1,142
|
|
|
|
2,087
|
|
|
|
2,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fee-for-service pre-tax income
|
|
$
|
12,017
|
|
|
$
|
10,872
|
|
|
$
|
10,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP expense ratio as reported
|
|
|
31.3
|
%
|
|
|
34.2
|
%
|
|
|
34.5
|
%
|
Adjustment to include pre-tax income from total fee-for-service
income(1)
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP expense ratio as adjusted
|
|
|
28.0
|
%
|
|
|
30.1
|
%
|
|
|
30.3
|
%
|
GAAP loss and LAE ratio as reported
|
|
|
62.0
|
%
|
|
|
61.2
|
%
|
|
|
62.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAAP combined ratio as adjusted
|
|
|
90.0
|
%
|
|
|
91.3
|
%
|
|
|
92.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Reconciliation of consolidated pre-tax income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty risk management operations pre-tax income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee-based operations pre-tax income
|
|
$
|
10,875
|
|
|
$
|
8,785
|
|
|
$
|
7,995
|
|
Underwriting income
|
|
|
24,820
|
|
|
|
12,563
|
|
|
|
8,153
|
|
Net investment income and realized (losses) gains
|
|
|
25,202
|
|
|
|
26,550
|
|
|
|
22,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total specialty risk management operations pre-tax income
|
|
|
60,897
|
|
|
|
47,898
|
|
|
|
38,292
|
|
Agency operations pre-tax income
|
|
|
1,142
|
|
|
|
2,087
|
|
|
|
2,609
|
|
Less: Holding company expenses
|
|
|
4,253
|
|
|
|
2,638
|
|
|
|
2,830
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
7,681
|
|
|
|
6,030
|
|
|
|
5,976
|
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
6,310
|
|
|
|
1,930
|
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated pre-tax income
|
|
$
|
43,795
|
|
|
$
|
39,387
|
|
|
$
|
31,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Adjustment to include pre-tax income from total fee-for-service
income is calculated by dividing total fee-for-service income by
net earned premiums. |
Regulatory
A significant portion of our consolidated assets represents
assets of our Insurance Company Subsidiaries that may not be
transferable to the holding company in the form of dividends,
loans or advances. The restriction on the transferability to the
holding company from our Insurance Company Subsidiaries is
limited by regulatory guidelines. These guidelines generally
specify that dividends can be paid only from unassigned surplus
and only to the extent that all dividends in the current twelve
months do not exceed the greater of 10% of total statutory
surplus as of the end of the prior fiscal year or 100% of the
statutory net income for the prior year. Using these criteria,
the available ordinary dividend available to be paid from the
Insurance Company Subsidiaries during 2008 is
$46.2 million. The Insurance Company Subsidiaries, which
include the insurance companies acquired in the ProCentury
merger, have paid ordinary dividends of $46.2 million in
2008. In 2009, the Insurance Company Subsidiaries have the
capacity to pay ordinary dividends of $39.5 million
without prior regulatory approval. In addition to ordinary
dividends, the Insurance Company Subsidiaries have the capacity
to pay $31.1 million of extraordinary dividends with prior
regulatory approval. The Insurance Company Subsidiaries
ability to pay future dividends without advance regulatory
approval is dependent upon maintaining a positive level of
unassigned surplus, which in turn, is dependent upon the
Insurance Company Subsidiaries generating net income. No
statutory dividends were paid from our Insurance Company
Subsidiaries during 2007.
Our Insurance Company Subsidiaries are required to maintain
certain deposits with regulatory authorities, which totaled
$100.9 million and $115.2 million at December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
66
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
Contractual
Obligations and Commitments
The following table is a summary of our contractual obligations
and commitments as of December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
One to
|
|
|
Three to
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
One Year
|
|
|
Three Years
|
|
|
Five Years
|
|
|
Five Years
|
|
|
Non-regulated companies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term Loan
|
|
$
|
60,250
|
|
|
$
|
10,375
|
|
|
$
|
26,000
|
|
|
$
|
23,875
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Lines of Credit(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note Payable, non-interest bearing
|
|
|
2,150
|
|
|
|
2,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debentures(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior debentures due 2034; issued $13.0 million
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
Senior debentures due 2034; issued $12.0 million
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures due 2035; issued
$20.6 million
|
|
|
20,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,620
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures due 2033; issued
$10.3 million
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures due 2032; issued
$15.0 million(3)
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures due 2033; issued
$10.0 million(3)
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Debt
|
|
|
143,330
|
|
|
|
12,525
|
|
|
|
26,000
|
|
|
|
23,875
|
|
|
|
80,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on Term Loan(4)
|
|
|
9,440
|
|
|
|
3,412
|
|
|
|
4,721
|
|
|
|
1,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on Debentures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior debentures due 2034; issued $13.0 million
|
|
|
7,224
|
|
|
|
1,032
|
|
|
|
2,064
|
|
|
|
2,064
|
|
|
|
2,064
|
|
Senior debentures due 2034; issued $12.0 million
|
|
|
6,906
|
|
|
|
987
|
|
|
|
1,973
|
|
|
|
1,973
|
|
|
|
1,973
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures due 2035; issued
$20.6 million
|
|
|
11,918
|
|
|
|
1,703
|
|
|
|
3,405
|
|
|
|
3,405
|
|
|
|
3,405
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures due 2033; issued
$10.3 million
|
|
|
5,733
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
|
|
1,638
|
|
|
|
1,638
|
|
|
|
1,638
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures due 2032; issued
$15.0 million(3)
|
|
|
8,180
|
|
|
|
1,169
|
|
|
|
2,337
|
|
|
|
2,337
|
|
|
|
2,337
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures due 2033; issued
$10.3 million(3)
|
|
|
5,516
|
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
1,576
|
|
|
|
1,576
|
|
|
|
1,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Interest Payable
|
|
|
54,917
|
|
|
|
9,910
|
|
|
|
17,714
|
|
|
|
14,300
|
|
|
|
12,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations(5)
|
|
|
16,651
|
|
|
|
4,031
|
|
|
|
7,287
|
|
|
|
5,113
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulated companies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses(6)
|
|
|
885,697
|
|
|
|
249,990
|
|
|
|
330,398
|
|
|
|
156,740
|
|
|
|
148,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,100,595
|
|
|
$
|
276,456
|
|
|
$
|
381,399
|
|
|
$
|
200,028
|
|
|
$
|
242,712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Relates to our revolving line of credit, which currently does
not have an outstanding balance. |
67
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Five year call feature associated with debentures, estimated
seven year repayment. For a description of our debentures and
related interest rate terms, as well as actual rates in
accordance with our interest rate swap transactions, refer to
Note 8 Debt and Note 9
Derivative Instruments. |
|
(3) |
|
Relates to the junior subordinated debentures acquired in
conjunction with the ProCentury merger. |
|
(4) |
|
For a description of our term loan and its interest rate terms,
as well as actual rates in accordance with our interest rate
swap transaction, refer to Note 8 Debt
and Note 9 Derivative Instruments. |
|
(5) |
|
Consists of rental obligations under real estate leases related
to branch offices. In addition, includes amounts related to
equipment leases. |
|
(6) |
|
The loss and loss adjustment expense payments do not have
contractual maturity dates and the exact timing of payments
cannot be predicted with certainty. However, based upon
historical payment patterns, we have included an estimate of our
gross losses and loss adjustment expenses. In addition, we have
anticipated cash receipts on reinsurance recoverables on unpaid
losses and loss adjustment expenses of $260.4 million, of
which we estimate that these payments to be paid for losses and
loss adjustment expenses for the periods less than one year, one
to three years, three to five years, and more than five years to
be $55.6 million, $92.2 million, $65.3 million,
and $47.3 million, respectively, resulting in net losses
and loss adjustment expenses of $194.4 million,
$238.2 million, $91.4 million, and
$101.3 million, respectively. |
We maintain an investment portfolio with varying maturities that
we believe will provide adequate cash for the payment of claims.
Variable
Compensation
We have established two variable compensation plans as an
incentive for performance of our management team. They consist
of an Annual Bonus Plan (Bonus Plan) and a Long-Term
Incentive Plan (LTIP). The Bonus Plan is a
discretionary cash bonus plan premised upon a targeted growth in
net after-tax earnings on a year over year basis. Each year, the
Compensation Committee and our Board of Directors establish a
new target based upon prior year performance and the forecasted
performance levels anticipated for the following year. The
amount of the bonus pool is established by aggregating the
individual targets for each participant, which is a percentage
of salary. At the end of the year, the Compensation Committee
and the Board of Directors review our performance in relation to
performance targets and then establish the total bonus pool to
be utilized to pay cash bonuses to the management team based
upon overall corporate and individual participant goals.
The LTIP is intended to provide an incentive to management to
improve our performance over a three year period, thereby
increasing shareholder value. The LTIP is not discretionary and
is based upon a target for an average three year return on
beginning equity. If the targets are met and all other terms and
conditions are satisfied, the LTIP awards are paid. The LTIP is
paid 50% in cash and 50% in stock. A participants
percentage is established by the Compensation Committee and the
Board of Directors in advance of any new three year LTIP award.
The stock component of the LTIP is paid based upon the closing
stock price at the beginning of the three year LTIP performance
period, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the LTIP.
With the ProCentury merger our Compensation Committee and Board
of Directors determined that our need for successfully
integrating ProCentury associates into our LTIP would be
heightened and shareholder value increased, if all participants
were in the same plan beginning in 2009. As a result, our
Compensation Committee approved the termination of our current
2007-2009
LTIP effective December 31, 2008 and established a new plan
for
2009-2011
based on new performance targets. Based on this amendment, the
current LTIP participants would receive their award based on a
two-year performance period, rather than a three-year period.
Therefore, the total award would be approximately two-thirds of
the original three-year
68
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
award. There were no accounting adjustments as a result of the
amendment as there were no changes to the underlying plan, only
an adjustment to the performance period.
Both the Bonus Plan and the LTIP are administered by the
Compensation Committee and all awards are reviewed and approved
by the Board of Directors at both inception and at distribution.
Regulatory
and Rating Issues
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners
(NAIC) has adopted a risk-based capital
(RBC) formula to be applied to all property and
casualty insurance companies. The formula measures required
capital and surplus based on an insurance companys
products and investment portfolio and is used as a tool to
evaluate the capital of regulated companies. The RBC formula is
used by state insurance regulators to monitor trends in
statutory capital and surplus for the purpose of initiating
regulatory action. In general, an insurance company must submit
a calculation of its RBC formula to the insurance department of
its state of domicile as of the end of the previous calendar
year. These laws require increasing degrees of regulatory
oversight and intervention as an insurance companys RBC
declines. The level of regulatory oversight ranges from
requiring the insurance company to inform and obtain approval
from the domiciliary insurance commissioner of a comprehensive
financial plan for increasing its RBC to mandatory regulatory
intervention requiring an insurance company to be placed under
regulatory control in a rehabilitation or liquidation proceeding.
At December 31, 2008, each of our Insurance Company
Subsidiaries was in excess of any minimum threshold at which
corrective action would be required.
Insurance operations are subject to various leverage tests
(e.g., premium to statutory surplus ratios), which are evaluated
by regulators and rating agencies. Our targets for gross and net
written premium to statutory surplus are 2.8 to 1.0 and 2.25 to
1.0, respectively. As of December 31, 2008, on a statutory
consolidated basis, including the insurance company subsidiaries
acquired in the ProCentury merger, gross and net premium
leverage ratios were 1.4 to 1.0 and 1.2 to 1.0, respectively.
The NAICs Insurance Regulatory Information System
(IRIS) was developed by a committee of state
insurance regulators and is primarily intended to assist state
insurance departments in executing their statutory mandates to
oversee the financial condition of insurance companies operating
in their respective states. IRIS identifies thirteen industry
ratios and specifies usual values for each ratio.
Departure from the usual values on four or more
ratios generally leads to inquiries or possible further review
from individual state insurance commissioners.
In 2008, our Insurance Company Subsidiaries generated four
ratios that varied from the usual value range. The
variations and reasons are set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Usual Range
|
|
Value
|
|
Company: Williamsburg
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Agents Balances to Policyholders Surplus
|
|
Under 40%
|
|
40%(1)
|
Company: ProCentury Insurance Company
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Liabilities to Liquid Assets
|
|
Under 105%
|
|
106%(2)
|
Company: Century Surety Company
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Change in Policyholders Surplus
|
|
Over -10% or Under 50%
|
|
(20)%(3)
|
Change in Adjusted Policyholders Surplus
|
|
Over -10% or Under 25%
|
|
(20)%(3)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Gross Agents Balances to Policyholders Surplus
on Williamsburg was impacted by our Intercompany Reinsurance
Pooling Agreement. Williamsburgs assumed premium
receivable increased |
69
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
|
|
|
|
|
$6.3 million as a result of the intercompany pooling.
Excluding the intercompany pooling, this ratio would have been
within the usual range for 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
Adjusted Liabilities to Liquid Assets on ProCentury Insurance
Company is outside the usual range primarily from the result of
a reinsurance pooling agreement whereby its parent, Century
Surety Company, has withheld $30.4 million in accordance
with a provision included in the agreement for funds held to
secure unearned premiums and liabilities for loss and loss
adjustment expenses. |
|
(3) |
|
Both the Gross Change in Policyholders Surplus and Change
in Adjusted Policyholders Surplus are outside the usual
range for Century Surety Company primarily as a result of paying
its parent the maximum ordinary dividend of $27.4 million
in 2008. |
Reinsurance
Considerations
We seek to manage the risk exposure of our Insurance Company
Subsidiaries, including those insurance company subsidiaries we
acquired in the ProCentury merger, and our clients through the
purchase of excess-of-loss and quota share reinsurance. Our
reinsurance requirements are analyzed on a specific program
basis to determine the appropriate retention levels and
reinsurance coverage limits. We secure this reinsurance based on
the availability, cost, and benefits of various reinsurance
alternatives.
Reinsurance does not legally discharge an insurer from its
primary liability for the full amount of risks assumed under
insurance policies it issues, but it does make the assuming
reinsurer liable to the insurer to the extent of the reinsurance
ceded. Therefore, we are subject to credit risk with respect to
the obligations of our reinsurers.
In regard to our excess-of-loss reinsurance, we manage our
credit risk on reinsurance recoverables by reviewing the
financial stability, A.M. Best rating, capitalization, and
credit worthiness of prospective or existing reinsurers. We
generally do not seek collateral where the reinsurer is rated
A− or better by A. M. Best, has
$500 million or more in surplus, and is admitted in the
state of Michigan. The following table sets forth information
relating to our five largest unaffiliated excess-of-loss
reinsurers based upon ceded premium as of December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance Premium Ceded
|
|
|
Reinsurance Recoverable
|
|
|
A.M. Best
|
Reinsurer
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Rating
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Munich Reinsurance America
|
|
$
|
10,004
|
|
|
$
|
20,152
|
|
|
|
A+
|
|
Motors Insurance Corporation
|
|
|
9,482
|
|
|
|
19,694
|
|
|
|
A−
|
|
Lloyds Syndicate Number 2003
|
|
|
7,535
|
|
|
|
9,157
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
Swiss Reinsurance Corporation
|
|
|
6,834
|
|
|
|
12,014
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
Aspen Insurance UK Ltd.
|
|
|
4,636
|
|
|
|
16,457
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
In regard to our risk-sharing partners (client captive or
rent-a-captive
quota-share non-admitted reinsurers), we manage credit risk on
reinsurance recoverables by reviewing the financial stability,
capitalization, and credit worthiness of prospective or existing
reinsures or partners. We customarily collateralize reinsurance
balances due from non-admitted reinsurers through funds withheld
trusts or stand-by letters of credit issued by highly rated
banks.
To date, we have not, in the aggregate, experienced material
difficulties in collecting reinsurance recoverables.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2008, we have no off-balance sheet
arrangements as defined in Item 303(a) (4) of
Regulation S-K.
70
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
Convertible
Note
In December 2005, we entered into a $6.0 million
convertible note receivable with an unaffiliated insurance
agency. The effective interest rate of the convertible note is
equal to the three-month LIBOR, plus 5.2% and is due
December 20, 2010. This agency has been a producer for us
for over ten years. As security for the loan, the borrower
granted us a security interest in its accounts, cash, general
intangibles, and other intangible property. Also, the
shareholder then pledged 100% of the common shares of three
insurance agencies, the common shares owned by the shareholder
in another agency, and has executed a personal guaranty. This
note is convertible upon our option based upon a pre-determined
formula. The conversion feature of this note is considered an
embedded derivative pursuant to SFAS No. 133, and
therefore is accounted for separately from the note. At
December 31, 2008, the estimated fair value of the
derivative is not material to the financial statements.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair
value and establishes a framework for measuring fair value in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
SFAS No. 157 also requires expanded disclosures about
(1) the extent to which companies measure assets and
liabilities at fair value, (2) the methods and assumptions
used to measure fair value and (3) the effect of fair value
measures on earnings. SFAS No. 157 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We adopted
SFAS 157 in the first quarter of 2008.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115. SFAS No. 159 permits
entities the option to measure many financial instruments and
certain other assets and liabilities at fair value on an
instrument-by-instrument
basis as of specified election dates. This election is
irrevocable as to specific assets and liabilities. The objective
of SFAS No. 159 is to improve financial reporting and
reduce the volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring
related assets and liabilities differently.
SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007. We did not elect the fair value
option for existing eligible items under SFAS No. 159;
therefore it did not impact our consolidated financial condition
or results of operations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R),
Business Combinations.
SFAS No. 141(R) provides revised guidance on how
an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements,
the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and
any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. In addition, it
provides revised guidance on the recognition and measurement of
goodwill acquired in the business combination.
SFAS No. 141(R) also establishes disclosure
requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and
financial effects of the business combination.
SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for business combinations
completed on or after the beginning of the first annual
reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008,
or January 1, 2009. We do not expect the provisions of
SFAS No. 141(R) to have a material impact on our
consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 51 SFAS No. 160
establishes accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008. We are in the process of evaluating the impact of
SFAS No. 160, but believe the adoption of
SFAS No. 160 will not impact our consolidated
financial condition or results of operations.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities. SFAS No. 161 amends and expands
the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for
71
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
SFAS No. 161 requires qualitative disclosures
about objectives and strategies for using derivatives,
quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of gains and
losses on derivative instruments and disclosures about
credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative
agreements. This statement is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008.
We are in the process of evaluating the impact of
SFAS No. 161, but believe the adoption of
SFAS No. 161 will not materially impact our
consolidated financial condition or results of operations, but
may require additional disclosures related to any derivative or
hedging activities of ours.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
(FSP)
FAS 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets. FSP
FAS 142-3
amends the factors that should be considered in developing
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful
life of a recognized intangible asset under
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets. This FSP is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008. We are in the process of
evaluating the impact of this FSP, but believe it will not
materially impact our consolidated financial condition or
results of operations.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162,
The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles. SFAS No. 162 identifies the
sources of accounting principles and provides entities with a
framework for selecting the principles used in preparation of
financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP.
The current GAAP hierarchy has been criticized because it is
directed to the auditor rather than the entity, it is complex,
and it ranks FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Concepts,
which are subject to the same level of due process as FASB
Statements of Financial Accounting Standards, below industry
practices that are widely recognized as generally accepted but
that are not subject to due process. The FASB believes the GAAP
hierarchy should be directed to entities because it is the
entity that is responsible for selecting accounting principles
for financial statements that are presented in conformity with
GAAP, not its auditors. SFAS No. 162 is effective
sixty days following the Securities and Exchange
Commissions approval of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411 The
Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles. The adoption of
SFAS No. 162 is not expected to have a material impact
on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 163,
Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance
Contracts-an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 60. Diversity exists in practice in
accounting for financial guarantee insurance contracts by
insurance enterprises under SFAS No. 60
Accounting and Reporting by Insurance
Enterprises. This results in inconsistencies in the
recognition and measurement of claim liabilities due to
differing views about when a loss has been incurred under
SFAS No. 5 Accounting for
Contingencies. This Statement requires that an
insurance enterprise recognize a claim liability prior to an
event of default when there is evidence that credit
deterioration has occurred in an insured financial obligation.
This Statement requires expanded disclosures about financial
guarantee insurance contracts. The accounting and disclosure
required under SFAS No. 163 will improve the quality
of information provided to users of financial statements. This
statement is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and all
interim periods within those fiscal years, except for some
disclosures about the insurance enterprises
risk-management activities. We are in the process of evaluating
the impact of SFAS No. 163, but believe the adoption
of SFAS No. 163 will not impact our consolidated
financial condition or results of operations, but may require
additional disclosures.
In January 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
No. EITF 99-20-1,
Amendments to the Impairment and Interest Income
Measurement Guidance of EITF Issue
No. 99-20
(FSP
EITF 99-20-1),
which is effective for interim and annual reporting periods
ending after December 15, 2008. FSP
EITF 99-20-1
amends
EITF 99-20,
Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment of
Purchased Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests That
Continue to Be Held by a Transferor in Securitized Financial
Assets
(EITF 99-20).
FSP
EITF 99-20-1
eliminates the requirement that a holders best estimate of
cash flows be based upon those that a market participant would
use. Instead, FSP
EITF 99-20-1
requires that an other than temporary
72
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS continued
impairment be recognized as a realized loss through earnings
when it is probable there has been an adverse change in the
estimated cash flows from those previously projected, which is
consistent with the impairment model in SFAS 115,
Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity
Securities. We are in the process of evaluating the
impact of FSP
EITF 99-20-1,
but believe the adoption of FSP
EITF 99-20-1
will not have a material impact our consolidated financial
condition or results of operations.
Related
Party Transactions
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, we held an $852,000 and
$870,000 note receivable from one of our executive officers,
including $191,000 and $209,000 of accrued interest,
respectively. This note arose from a transaction in late 1998 in
which we loaned the officer funds to exercise 64,718 common
stock options to cover the exercise price and the taxes incurred
as a result of the exercise. The note bears interest equal to
the rate charged pursuant to our revolving credit agreement and
is due on demand any time after January 1, 2002. As of
December 31, 2008, the rate was 3.42%. The loan is
partially collateralized by 64,718 shares of our common
stock under a stock pledge agreement. For the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, $43,800 and $43,800,
respectively, have been paid against the loan. As of
December 31, 2008, the cumulative amount that has been paid
against this loan was $206,600. Refer to
Note 20 Related Party Transaction for
further information.
73
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Qualitative
and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in
market rates and prices, such as interest rates as well as other
relevant market rate or price changes. The volatility and
liquidity in the markets in which the underlying assets are
traded directly influence market risk. The following is a
discussion of our primary risk exposures and how those exposures
are currently managed as of December 31, 2008. Our market
risk sensitive instruments are primarily related to fixed income
securities, which are available for sale and not held for
trading purposes.
Interest rate risk is managed within the context of an asset and
liability management strategy where the target duration for the
fixed income portfolio is based on the estimate of the liability
duration and takes into consideration our surplus. The
investment policy guidelines provide for a fixed income
portfolio duration of between three and a half and five and a
half years. At December 31, 2008, our fixed income
portfolio had a modified duration of 4.47, compared to 4.30 at
December 31, 2007.
At December 31, 2008, the fair value of our investment
portfolio, excluding cash and cash equivalents, was
$1.0 billion. Our market risk to the investment portfolio
is primarily interest rate risk associated with debt securities.
Our exposure to equity price risk is related to our investments
in relatively small positions of preferred stocks and mutual
funds with an emphasis on dividend income. These investments,
which were acquired as a result of our Merger with ProCentury,
comprise 2.4% of our investment portfolio.
Our investment philosophy is one of maximizing after-tax
earnings and has historically included significant investments
in tax-exempt bonds. We continue to increase our holdings of
tax-exempt securities based on our desire to maximize after-tax
investment income. For our investment portfolio, there were no
significant changes in our primary market risk exposures or in
how those exposures are managed compared to the year ended
December 31, 2007. We do not anticipate significant changes
in our primary market risk exposures or in how those exposures
are managed in future reporting periods based upon what is known
or expected to be in effect.
A sensitivity analysis is defined as the measurement of
potential loss in future earnings, fair values, or cash flows of
market sensitive instruments resulting from one or more selected
hypothetical changes in interest rates and other market rates or
prices over a selected period. In our sensitivity analysis
model, a hypothetical change in market rates is selected that is
expected to reflect reasonable possible near-term changes in
those rates. Near term means a period of up to one
year from the date of the consolidated financial statements. In
our sensitivity model, we use fair values to measure our
potential loss of debt securities assuming an upward parallel
shift in interest rates to measure the hypothetical change in
fair values. The table below presents our models estimate
of changes in fair values given a change in interest rates.
Dollar values are in thousands.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rates Down 100bps
|
|
|
Rates Unchanged
|
|
|
Rates Up 100bps
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
$
|
1,027,299
|
|
|
$
|
984,169
|
|
|
$
|
931,577
|
|
Yield to Maturity or Call
|
|
|
3.97
|
%
|
|
|
4.91
|
%
|
|
|
5.86
|
%
|
Effective Duration
|
|
|
4.23
|
|
|
|
4.81
|
|
|
|
5.12
|
|
The other financial instruments, which include cash and cash
equivalents, equity securities, premium receivables, reinsurance
recoverables, line of credit and other assets and liabilities,
when included in the sensitivity model, do not produce a
material change in fair values.
Our debentures are subject to variable interest rates. Thus, our
interest expense on these debentures is directly correlated to
market interest rates. At December 31, 2008, we had
debentures of $80.9 million. At this level, a
100 basis point (1%) change in market rates would change
annual interest expense by $809,000. At December 31, 2007,
we had debentures of $55.9 million. At this level, a
100 basis point (1%) change in market rates would change
annual interest expense by $559,000.
Our term loan is subject to variable interest rates. Thus, our
interest expense on our term loan is directly correlated to
market interest rates. At December 31, 2008, we had an
outstanding balance on our term loan of
74
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
$60.25 million. At this level, a 100 basis point (1%)
change in market rates would change annual interest expense by
$602,500. At December 31, 2007, we did not have any
outstanding term loans.
We have entered into interest rate swap transactions to mitigate
our interest rate risk on our existing debt obligations. We
accrue for these transactions in accordance with
SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, as subsequently
amended. These interest rate swap transactions have been
designated as cash flow hedges and are deemed highly effective
hedges under SFAS No. 133. In accordance with
SFAS No. 133, these interest rate swap transactions
are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet and the
effective portion of the changes in fair value are accounted for
within other comprehensive income. The interest differential to
be paid or received is accrued and recognized as an adjustment
to interest expense. Refer to
Note 9 Derivative Instruments for
further detail relating to our interest rate swap transactions.
In addition, our revolving line of credit under which we can
borrow up to $35.0 million is subject to variable interest
rates. Thus, our interest expense on the revolving line of
credit is directly correlated to market interest rates. At
December 31, 2008 and 2007, we did not have an outstanding
balance on our revolving line of credit.
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
Refer to list of Financial Statement Schedules and
Note 22 Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Exchange
Act), which we refer to as disclosure controls, are
controls and procedures that are designed with the objective of
ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our
reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this annual
report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms. Disclosure controls are also
designed with the objective of ensuring that such information is
accumulated and communicated to our management, including our
Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness
of any control system. A control system, no matter how well
conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance
that its objectives are met. No evaluation of controls can
provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances
of fraud, if any, within our Company have been detected.
As of December 31, 2008, an evaluation was carried out
under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that the design and operation of these
disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that
material information relating to us is made known to management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, particularly during the period when our periodic
reports are being prepared.
Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined
in
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15d-15(f)
under the Exchange Act). Our internal control system was
designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the
75
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. Because of its inherent limitations,
internal controls over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may be inadequate because of changes in conditions, or
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the
effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2008. In making this assessment,
management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in
Internal Control Integrated Framework.
Based on our assessment, we concluded that, as of
December 31, 2008, our internal controls over financial
reporting was effective based on those criteria.
Our assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting excluded the internal
controls of ProCentury, Five months of earnings of ProCentury
are included in the financial statements of the Company as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2008. As of
December 31, 2008, ProCentury constituted approximately
$584.8 million and $141.3 million of total assets and
net assets, respectively, and $80.1 million and
($2.7 million) of revenues and net loss, respectively, for
the year then ended.
The attestation report of Ernst & Young LLP, our
independent registered public accounting firm, regarding
internal control over financial reporting is set forth in
Item 8 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
under the caption Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm and incorporated herein by reference.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting during the most recent quarter ended
December 31, 2008, which have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls
over financial reporting.
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
PART III
Certain information required by Part III is omitted from
this Report in that the Registrant will file a definitive Proxy
Statement pursuant to Regulation 14A (the Proxy
Statement) not later than 120 days after the end of
the fiscal year covered by this report and certain information
included therein is incorporated herein by reference. Only those
sections of the Proxy Statement that specifically address the
items set forth herein are incorporated by reference.
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance
|
The information required by this item is included under the
captions Information about the Nominees, the Incumbent
Directors and Other Executive Officers, Corporate
Governance, Code of Conduct, Report of
the Audit Committee, and Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance of our Proxy
Statement relating to our Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be
held on May 14, 2009, which is hereby incorporated by
reference. Our Code of Conduct can be found on our website
www.meadowbrook.com.
76
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
The information required by this item is included under the
captions Compensation of Executive Officers,
Director Compensation, Report of the
Compensation Committee of the Board on Executive
Compensation, and Compensation Committee
Interlocks and Insider Participation of our Proxy
Statement relating to our Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be
held on May 14, 2009, which is hereby incorporated by
reference.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
The information required by this item is included under the
caption Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
and Management of our Proxy Statement relating to our
Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 14, 2009,
which is hereby incorporated by reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plan Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available for
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities to
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Future Issuance Under
|
|
|
|
be Issued Upon Exercise
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Equity Compensation
|
|
|
|
of Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
|
Plans (Excluding
|
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
|
Securities in Column (a))
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
64,750
|
|
|
$
|
16.03
|
|
|
|
779,601
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
64,750
|
|
|
$
|
16.03
|
|
|
|
779,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions and Director
Independence
|
The information required by this item is included under the
captions Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions and Independence
Determination of our Proxy Statement relating to our
Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 14, 2009,
which is hereby incorporated by reference.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
The information required by this item is included under the
caption The Second Proposal on Which You are Voting on
Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm of our Proxy Statement relating to our
Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 14, 2009,
which is hereby incorporated by reference.
77
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits,
Financial Statement Schedules
|
(A) The following documents are filed as part of this
Report:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
1.
|
|
|
List of Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86-125
|
|
|
2.
|
|
|
Financial Statement Schedules
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127-130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131-133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
3.
|
|
|
Exhibits: The Exhibits listed on the accompanying
Exhibit Index immediately following the financial statement
schedule are filed as part of, or incorporated by reference
into, this
Form 10-K
|
|
|
|
|
78
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board
of Directors and Shareholders of
Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. as of December 31, 2008
and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income,
comprehensive income, shareholders equity, and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2008. Our audits also included the financial
statement schedules listed in the Index at Item 15(a).
These financial statements and schedules are the responsibility
of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements and schedules
based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. at
December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the consolidated results of
its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2008, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our
opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken
as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc.s internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on
criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission and our report dated March 16, 2009
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst
&
Young LLP
Detroit, Michigan
March 16, 2009
79
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc.:
We have audited Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc.s
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(the COSO criteria). Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc.s
management is responsible for maintaining effective internal
control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
included in the accompanying Managements Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on the Companys internal control
over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As indicated in the accompanying Managements Report on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting, managements
assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting did not include the internal
controls of ProCentury Corporation, which is included in the
2008 consolidated financial statements of Meadowbrook Insurance
Group, Inc. and constituted $593.8 million and
$141.3 million of total and net assets, respectively, as of
December 31, 2008 and $80.1 million and
($2.7 million) of revenues and net income (loss),
respectively, for the year then ended. Our audit of internal
control over financial reporting of Meadowbrook Insurance Group,
Inc. also did not include an evaluation of the internal control
over financial reporting of ProCentury Corporation.
In our opinion, Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. maintained, in
all material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on the COSO
criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc.
as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related
consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income,
shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2008 and our report
dated March 16, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion
thereon.
/s/ Ernst
&
Young LLP
Detroit, Michigan
March 16, 2009
80
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands,
|
|
|
|
except share data)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities available for sale, at fair value (amortized
cost of $977,613 and $604,829 in 2008 and 2007, respectively)
|
|
$
|
986,483
|
|
|
$
|
610,756
|
|
Equity securities available for sale, at fair value (cost of
$27,660 and $0 in 2008 and 2007, respectively)
|
|
|
22,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
76,588
|
|
|
|
40,845
|
|
Accrued investment income
|
|
|
10,441
|
|
|
|
6,473
|
|
Premiums and agent balances receivable (net of allowance of
$2,945 and $2,747 in 2008 and 2007, respectively)
|
|
|
117,675
|
|
|
|
87,341
|
|
Reinsurance recoverable on:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid losses
|
|
|
8,337
|
|
|
|
1,053
|
|
Unpaid losses
|
|
|
260,366
|
|
|
|
198,461
|
|
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
|
|
|
31,885
|
|
|
|
17,763
|
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
56,454
|
|
|
|
26,926
|
|
Deferred income taxes, net
|
|
|
22,718
|
|
|
|
14,936
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
119,028
|
|
|
|
43,497
|
|
Other intangible assets
|
|
|
46,951
|
|
|
|
17,078
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
54,413
|
|
|
|
48,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,813,916
|
|
|
$
|
1,113,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
$
|
885,697
|
|
|
$
|
540,002
|
|
Unearned premiums
|
|
|
282,086
|
|
|
|
153,927
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
60,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debentures
|
|
|
80,930
|
|
|
|
55,930
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
27,839
|
|
|
|
22,604
|
|
Reinsurance funds held and balances payable
|
|
|
27,793
|
|
|
|
16,416
|
|
Payable to insurance companies
|
|
|
3,221
|
|
|
|
6,231
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
7,930
|
|
|
|
16,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,375,746
|
|
|
|
812,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 stated value; authorized
75,000,000 shares; 57,341,989 and 36,996,287 shares
issued and outstanding
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
314,641
|
|
|
|
194,621
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
127,157
|
|
|
|
104,274
|
|
Note receivable from officer
|
|
|
(852
|
)
|
|
|
(870
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
|
(3,349
|
)
|
|
|
3,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
438,170
|
|
|
|
301,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,813,916
|
|
|
$
|
1,113,966
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
81
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
$
|
455,782
|
|
|
$
|
337,099
|
|
|
$
|
327,287
|
|
Ceded
|
|
|
(86,061
|
)
|
|
|
(68,902
|
)
|
|
|
(72,367
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earned premiums
|
|
|
369,721
|
|
|
|
268,197
|
|
|
|
254,920
|
|
Net commissions and fees
|
|
|
42,904
|
|
|
|
45,988
|
|
|
|
41,172
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
36,624
|
|
|
|
26,400
|
|
|
|
22,075
|
|
Net realized (losses) gains
|
|
|
(11,422
|
)
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
437,827
|
|
|
|
340,735
|
|
|
|
318,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
282,822
|
|
|
|
191,885
|
|
|
|
212,383
|
|
Reinsurance recoveries
|
|
|
(69,937
|
)
|
|
|
(40,916
|
)
|
|
|
(66,090
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
212,885
|
|
|
|
150,969
|
|
|
|
146,293
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
|
62,862
|
|
|
|
56,433
|
|
|
|
54,569
|
|
Policy acquisition and other underwriting expenses
|
|
|
69,294
|
|
|
|
53,717
|
|
|
|
50,479
|
|
Other administrative expenses
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
32,269
|
|
|
|
28,824
|
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
6,310
|
|
|
|
1,930
|
|
|
|
590
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
7,681
|
|
|
|
6,030
|
|
|
|
5,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
394,032
|
|
|
|
301,348
|
|
|
|
286,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes and equity earnings
|
|
|
43,795
|
|
|
|
39,387
|
|
|
|
31,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal and state income tax expense
|
|
|
16,667
|
|
|
|
11,726
|
|
|
|
9,599
|
|
Equity earnings of affiliates
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
27,397
|
|
|
$
|
27,992
|
|
|
$
|
22,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
44,810,944
|
|
|
|
33,007,200
|
|
|
|
28,963,228
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
44,995,712
|
|
|
|
33,101,965
|
|
|
|
29,566,141
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
82
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
27,397
|
|
|
$
|
27,992
|
|
|
$
|
22,034
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (losses) gains on securities
|
|
|
(12,960
|
)
|
|
|
4,810
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
Net deferred derivative (loss) gain hedging activity
|
|
|
(5,457
|
)
|
|
|
(484
|
)
|
|
|
121
|
|
Less: reclassification adjustment for investment losses included
in net income
|
|
|
11,569
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
|
(6,848
|
)
|
|
|
4,336
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
20,549
|
|
|
$
|
32,328
|
|
|
$
|
22,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
83
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Receivable
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
from Officer
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balances January 1, 2006
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
124,819
|
|
|
$
|
54,248
|
|
|
$
|
(859
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,130
|
)
|
|
$
|
177,365
|
|
Unrealized appreciation on available for sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
Net deferred derivative gain hedging activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
Long term incentive plan; stock award
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
897
|
|
Stock-based employee compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
Issuance of 791,038 shares of common stock
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
4,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,161
|
|
Retirement of 355,229 shares of common stock
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(3,162
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,166
|
)
|
Note receivable from an officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances December 31, 2006
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
126,828
|
|
|
|
76,282
|
|
|
|
(871
|
)
|
|
|
(837
|
)
|
|
|
201,693
|
|
Unrealized appreciation on available for sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,820
|
|
|
|
4,820
|
|
Net deferred derivative loss hedging activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(484
|
)
|
|
|
(484
|
)
|
Long term incentive plan; stock award for
2007-2009
plan years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
772
|
|
Long term incentive plan; stock award for
2004-2006
plan years
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(1,845
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,841
|
)
|
Stock-based employee compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Issuance of 244,574 shares of common stock
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
Retirement of 89,466 shares of common stock
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1,020
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,021
|
)
|
Equity offering issuance of 6,437,500 shares of common stock
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
58,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,584
|
|
Issuance of 907,935 shares of common stock for acquisition
of business of USSU
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9,991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Note receivable from an officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances December 31, 2007
|
|
|
370
|
|
|
|
194,621
|
|
|
|
104,274
|
|
|
|
(870
|
)
|
|
|
3,499
|
|
|
|
301,894
|
|
Unrealized depreciation on available for sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,391
|
)
|
|
|
(1,391
|
)
|
Net deferred derivative loss hedging activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,457
|
)
|
|
|
(5,457
|
)
|
Dividends declared at $0.02 per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,797
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,797
|
)
|
Long term incentive plan; stock award for
2007-2008
plan years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,902
|
|
Issuance of 31,745 shares of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
Retirement of 7,000 shares of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
Repurchase of 800,000 shares of common stock
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(4,217
|
)
|
|
|
(717
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,942
|
)
|
Issuance of 21,122,990 shares of common stock for merger
with ProCentury Corporation
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
122,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,725
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments related to the merger with
ProCentury Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(263
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(263
|
)
|
Note receivable from an officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
573
|
|
|
$
|
314,641
|
|
|
$
|
127,157
|
|
|
$
|
(852
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,349
|
)
|
|
$
|
438,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
84
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
27,397
|
|
|
$
|
27,992
|
|
|
$
|
22,034
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of other intangible assets
|
|
|
6,310
|
|
|
|
1,930
|
|
|
|
590
|
|
Amortization of deferred debenture issuance costs
|
|
|
496
|
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
Depreciation of furniture, equipment, and building
|
|
|
3,953
|
|
|
|
3,147
|
|
|
|
2,553
|
|
Net accretion of discount and premiums on bonds
|
|
|
3,080
|
|
|
|
2,707
|
|
|
|
2,646
|
|
Loss on investments
|
|
|
11,569
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Gain on sale of fixed assets
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
Stock-based employee compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
Incremental tax benefits from stock options exercised
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(728
|
)
|
|
|
(1,532
|
)
|
Long term incentive plan expense
|
|
|
817
|
|
|
|
772
|
|
|
|
897
|
|
Deferred income tax expense
|
|
|
2,742
|
|
|
|
(1,538
|
)
|
|
|
741
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums and agent balances receivable
|
|
|
6,162
|
|
|
|
2,111
|
|
|
|
(771
|
)
|
Reinsurance recoverable on paid and unpaid losses
|
|
|
(23,667
|
)
|
|
|
3,166
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
Prepaid reinsurance premiums
|
|
|
3,572
|
|
|
|
2,662
|
|
|
|
4,162
|
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
(2,092
|
)
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
|
(1,531
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
6,848
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(1,044
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
56,163
|
|
|
|
38,925
|
|
|
|
42,400
|
|
Unearned premiums
|
|
|
1,901
|
|
|
|
9,352
|
|
|
|
3,585
|
|
Payable to insurance companies
|
|
|
(3,009
|
)
|
|
|
789
|
|
|
|
(1,242
|
)
|
Reinsurance funds held and balances payable
|
|
|
(2,533
|
)
|
|
|
1,292
|
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
(5,244
|
)
|
|
|
718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
73,520
|
|
|
|
60,615
|
|
|
|
52,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
100,917
|
|
|
|
88,607
|
|
|
|
74,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of debt securities available for sale
|
|
|
(171,750
|
)
|
|
|
(393,676
|
)
|
|
|
(201,920
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of equity securities available for sale
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales and maturities of debt securities available
for sale
|
|
|
168,582
|
|
|
|
272,337
|
|
|
|
116,978
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(3,007
|
)
|
|
|
(3,109
|
)
|
|
|
(4,850
|
)
|
Purchase of books of business
|
|
|
(2,454
|
)
|
|
|
(3,344
|
)
|
|
|
(834
|
)
|
Acquisition of U.S. Specialty Underwriters, Inc.(1)
|
|
|
(20,971
|
)
|
|
|
(12,644
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Merger with ProCentury, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(82,039
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan receivable
|
|
|
(1,656
|
)
|
|
|
(310
|
)
|
|
|
(202
|
)
|
Net cash (withheld) deposited in funds held
|
|
|
(3,055
|
)
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(116,271
|
)
|
|
|
(140,402
|
)
|
|
|
(90,299
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from lines of credit
|
|
|
73,000
|
|
|
|
19,025
|
|
|
|
14,078
|
|
Payment of lines of credit
|
|
|
(12,750
|
)
|
|
|
(26,025
|
)
|
|
|
(14,078
|
)
|
Book overdrafts
|
|
|
(384
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
142
|
|
Dividend paid on common stock
|
|
|
(3,797
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payment for payroll taxes associated with long-term
incentive plan net stock issuance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,841
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(374
|
)
|
|
|
(538
|
)
|
Share repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
(4,942
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incremental tax benefits from stock options exercised
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
1,532
|
|
Net proceeds received from public equity offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financing activities
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
(295
|
)
|
|
|
(290
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
51,097
|
|
|
|
49,764
|
|
|
|
846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
35,743
|
|
|
|
(2,031
|
)
|
|
|
(15,162
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
|
|
40,845
|
|
|
|
42,876
|
|
|
|
58,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
|
|
$
|
76,588
|
|
|
$
|
40,845
|
|
|
$
|
42,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
6,513
|
|
|
$
|
5,894
|
|
|
$
|
5,616
|
|
Net income taxes paid
|
|
$
|
10,855
|
|
|
$
|
11,557
|
|
|
$
|
9,159
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure of Non Cash Investing and Financing
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit from stock options
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
$
|
728
|
|
|
$
|
1,532
|
|
Stock-based employee compensation
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
Common stock portion of purchase price for acquisition of U.S.
Specialty Underwriters, Inc.
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Common stock portion of purchase price for merger with
ProCentury Corporation
|
|
$
|
122,725
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Effective January 31, 2008,
the Company exercised its option to purchase the remainder of
the economics related to the acquisition of the USSU business.
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
85
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
1.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Basis of
Presentation and Principles of Consolidation
On February 20, 2008, Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc.
(Meadowbrook or the Company) and
ProCentury Corporation (ProCentury) entered into a
merger agreement (the Merger Agreement) pursuant to
which ProCentury and its wholly owned subsidiaries, became a
wholly owned subsidiary of Meadowbrook as of August 1, 2008
(the Merger). Meadowbrook has accounted for the
Merger as a purchase business combination and has applied fair
value estimates to the acquired assets and liabilities of
ProCentury as of August 1, 2008. As a result of the Merger,
the consolidated financial statements presented herein for
periods ending prior to the effective date of the Merger are the
consolidated financial statements and other financial
information of Meadowbrook. The Consolidated Balance Sheet at
December 31, 2008 and the Consolidated Statement of Income
for the year ended December 31, 2008, reflect the
consolidated results of Meadowbrook and ProCentury commencing on
August 1, 2008. Refer to Note 2
ProCentury Merger, for additional discussion of the Merger
and a pro forma presentation of financial results of the
combined company.
The consolidated financial statements include accounts, after
elimination of intercompany accounts and transactions, of
Meadowbrook, its wholly owned subsidiary Star Insurance Company
(Star), and Stars wholly owned subsidiaries,
Savers Property and Casualty Insurance Company
(Savers), Williamsburg National Insurance Company
(Williamsburg), and Ameritrust Insurance Corporation
(Ameritrust), and Preferred Insurance Company, Ltd.
(PICL). The consolidated financial statements also
include Meadowbrook, Inc. (Meadowbrook), Crest
Financial Corporation, and their respective subsidiaries. As of
December 31, 2007, PICL was deregulated under Bermuda law
and merged into Meadowbrooks subsidiary, Meadowbrook Risk
Management, Ltd. On January 31, 2008, PICL was legally
dissolved. In addition and as described above, the consolidated
financial statements also include ProCentury and its wholly
owned subsidiaries. ProCenturys wholly owned subsidiaries
consist of Century Surety Company (Century) and its
wholly owned subsidiary ProCentury Insurance Company
(PIC). In addition, ProCentury Risk Partners
Insurance Co., (Propic) is a wholly owned subsidiary
of ProCentury. Star, Savers, Williamsburg, Ameritrust, Century,
and PIC are collectively referred to as the Insurance Company
Subsidiaries.
Pursuant to Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Interpretation Number (FIN)
46(R), the Company does not consolidate its subsidiaries,
Meadowbrook Capital Trust I and II (the
Trusts), as they are not variable interest entities
and the Company is not the primary beneficiary of the Trusts.
The consolidated financial statements, however, include the
equity earnings of the Trusts. In addition and in accordance
with FIN 46(R), the Company does not consolidate its
subsidiary American Indemnity Insurance Company, Ltd.
(American Indemnity). While the Company and its
subsidiary Star are the common shareholders, they are not the
primary beneficiaries of American Indemnity. The consolidated
financial statements, however, include the equity earnings of
American Indemnity.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States (GAAP), which differ
from statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted for
insurance companies by regulatory authorities. Prescribed
statutory accounting practices include a variety of publications
of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners
(NAIC), as well as state laws, regulations and
general administrative rules. Permitted statutory accounting
practices encompass all accounting practices not so prescribed.
Business
The Company, through its subsidiaries, is engaged primarily in
developing and managing specialty risk management programs for
defined client groups and their members. These services include:
risk management consulting, claims administration and handling,
loss control and prevention, and reinsurance placement, along
with various types of property and casualty insurance coverage,
including workers compensation, commercial
86
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
multiple peril, general liability, commercial auto liability,
and inland marine. The Company, through its Insurance Company
Subsidiaries, issues insurance policies for client risk-sharing
and fully insured programs. The Company retains underwriting
risk in these insurance programs, which may result in
fluctuations in earnings. The Company also operates retail
insurance agencies, which primarily place commercial insurance
as well as personal property, casualty, life and accident and
health insurance, with multiple insurance carriers. Insurance
coverage is primarily provided to associations or similar groups
of members, commonly referred to as programs.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. While management
believes the amounts included in the consolidated financial
statements reflect managements best estimates and
assumptions, actual results may differ from those estimates.
Cash and
Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand and highly liquid
short-term investments. The Company considers all short-term
investments purchased with an original maturity of three months
or less to be cash equivalents.
Investments
The Companys investment securities are classified as
available for sale. Investments classified as available for sale
are available to be sold in the future in response to the
Companys liquidity needs, changes in market interest
rates, tax strategies and asset-liability management strategies,
among other reasons. Available for sale securities are reported
at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses reported in the
accumulated other comprehensive income component of
shareholders equity, net of deferred taxes and,
accordingly have no effect on net income.
Realized gains or losses on sale of investments are determined
on the basis of specific costs of the investments. Dividend
income is recognized when declared and interest income is
recognized when earned. Discount or premium on debt securities
purchased at other than par value is amortized using the
effective yield method. Investments with other than temporary
declines in fair value are written down to their estimated net
fair value and the related realized losses are recognized in
income.
Other
Than Temporary Impairments of Securities and Unrealized Losses
on Investments
The Companys investment portfolio is primarily invested in
debt securities classified as available for sale, with a
concentration in fixed income securities of a high quality. The
Companys policy for the evaluation of temporarily impaired
securities to determine whether the impairment is other than
temporary is based on analysis of the following factors:
(1) rating downgrade or other credit event (e.g., failure
to pay interest when due); (2) financial condition and
near-term prospects of the issuer, including any specific events
which may influence the operations of the issuer such as changes
in technology or discontinuance of a business segment;
(3) prospects for the issuers industry segment, and
(4) intent and ability of the Company to retain the
investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for
anticipated recovery in fair value. The Company evaluates its
investments in securities to determine other than temporary
impairment, no less than quarterly. Investments that are deemed
other than temporarily impaired are written down to their
estimated net fair value and the related losses are recognized
in operations.
87
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
After the Companys review of its investment portfolio in
relation to the above policy, the Company recorded a pre-tax
realized loss of $11.7 million, for the year ended
December 31, 2008, related to certain preferred stock
investments, including Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Lehman
Brothers investments, as well as several corporate bonds and
asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities. There were no
impaired investments written down in 2007 or 2006.
Additionally, for certain securitized financial assets with
contractual cash flows (including asset-backed securities), FASB
Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
99-20,
Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on
Purchased and Retained Beneficial Interests in Securitized
Financial Assets, requires us to periodically update
our best estimate of cash flows over the life of the security.
If management determines that the fair value of a securitized
financial asset is less than its carrying amount and there has
been a decrease in the present value of the estimated cash flows
since the last revised estimate, considering both timing and
amount, then an other than temporary impairment is recognized.
Losses
and Loss Adjustment Expenses and Reinsurance
Recoverables
The liability for losses and loss adjustment expenses
(LAE) represents case base estimates of reported
unpaid losses and LAE and actuarial estimates of incurred but
not reported (IBNR) losses and LAE. In addition, the
liability for losses and loss adjustment expenses represents
estimates received from ceding reinsurers on assumed business.
Such liabilities, by necessity, are based upon estimates and,
while management believes the amount of its reserves is
adequate, the ultimate liability may be greater or less than the
estimate.
Reserves related to the Companys direct business and
assumed business it manages directly, are established through
transactions processed through the Companys internal
systems and related controls. Accordingly, case reserves are
established on a current basis, therefore there is no delay or
lag in reporting of losses from a ceding company, and IBNR is
determined utilizing various actuarial methods based upon
historical data. Ultimate reserve estimates related to assumed
business from residual markets are provided by individual states
on a two quarter lag and include an estimated reserve based upon
actuarial methods for this lag. Assumed business which is
subsequently 100% retroceded to participating reinsurers relates
to business previously discontinued and now is in run-off.
Lastly, in relation to assumed business from other sources, the
Company receives case and paid loss data within a forty-five day
reporting period and develops estimates for IBNR based on both
current and historical data.
In addition to case reserves and in accordance with industry
practice, the Company maintains estimates of reserves for losses
and LAE IBNR. The Company projects an estimate of ultimate
losses and LAE expenses at each reporting date. The difference
between the projected ultimate loss and LAE reserves and the
case loss and LAE reserves, is carried as IBNR reserves. By
using both estimates of reported claims and IBNR determined
using generally accepted actuarial reserving techniques, the
Company estimates the ultimate liability for losses and LAE, net
of reinsurance recoverables.
Reinsurance recoverables represent (1) amounts currently
due from reinsurers on paid losses and LAE, (2) amounts
recoverable from reinsurers on case basis estimates of reported
losses and LAE, and (3) amounts recoverable from reinsurers
on actuarial estimates of incurred but not reported losses and
LAE. Such recoverables, by necessity, are based upon estimates
and, while management believes that the amount accrued is
collectible, the ultimate recoverable may be greater or less
than the amount accrued.
The methods for making such estimates and for establishing the
loss reserves and reinsurance recoverables are continually
reviewed and updated. There were no significant changes in key
assumptions during 2008, 2007 and 2006.
Revenue
Recognition
Premiums written, which include direct, assumed, and ceded
premiums are recognized as earned on a pro rata basis over the
life of the policy term. Unearned premiums represent the portion
of premiums written that are
88
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
applicable to the unexpired terms of policies in force.
Provisions for unearned premiums on reinsurance assumed from
others are made on the basis of ceding reports when received and
actuarial estimates.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, total assumed written
premiums were $8.1 million, of which $1.0 million
relates to assumed business the Company manages directly. The
remaining $7.1 million of assumed written premiums relates
to residual markets, mandatory assumed pool business, and other
unaffiliated entities. For the year ended December 31,
2007, total assumed written premiums were $39.2 million, of
which $31.0 million relates to assumed business the Company
manages directly. The remaining $8.2 million of assumed
written premiums relates to residual markets and mandatory
assumed pool business.
Assumed premium estimates are specifically related to the
mandatory assumed pool business from the National Council on
Compensation Insurance (NCCI), or residual market
business. The pool cedes workers compensation business to
participating companies based upon the individual companys
market share by state. The activity is reported from the NCCI to
participating companies on a two quarter lag. To accommodate
this lag, the Company estimates premium and loss activity based
on historical and market based results. Historically, the
Company has not experienced any material difficulties or
disputes in collecting balances from NCCI; and therefore, no
provision for doubtful accounts is recorded related to the
assumed premium estimate.
In addition, certain premiums are subject to retrospective
premium adjustments. Premium is recognized over the term of the
insurance contract. During the three months ended March 31,
2008, the Company recorded a $1.8 million adjustment to
reduce a premium accrual associated with a discontinued
retrospectively rated policy with one of its risk sharing
partners.
Fee income, which includes risk management consulting, loss
control, and claims services, is recognized during the period
the services are provided. Depending on the terms of the
contract, claims processing fees are recognized as revenue over
the estimated life of the claims, or the estimated life of the
contract. For those contracts that provide services beyond the
expiration or termination of the contract, fees are deferred in
an amount equal to managements estimate of the
Companys obligation to continue to provide services in the
future.
Commission income, which includes reinsurance placement, is
recorded on the later of the effective date or the billing date
of the policies on which they were earned. Commission income is
reported net of any
sub-producer
commission expense. Any commission adjustments that occur
subsequent to the earnings process are recognized upon
notification from the insurance companies. Profit sharing
commissions from insurance companies are recognized when
determinable, which is when such commissions are received.
The Company reviews, on an ongoing basis, the collectibility of
its receivables and establishes an allowance for estimated
uncollectible accounts.
Deferred
Policy Acquisition Costs
Commissions and other costs of acquiring insurance business that
vary with and are primarily related to the production of new and
renewal business are deferred and amortized over the terms of
the policies or reinsurance treaties to which they relate.
Investment earnings are anticipated in determining the
recoverability of such deferred amounts. The Company reduces
these costs for premium deficiencies. There were no premium
deficiencies for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007
and 2006.
Participating
Policyholder Dividends
The Companys method for determining policyholder dividends
is a combination of subjective and objective decisions, which
may include loss ratio analysis for the specific program and the
Companys overall business strategy. The Company determines
the total dividends to be paid and then obtains the approval of
the
89
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Board of Directors to pay up to a certain amount. At
December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had
$1.0 million and $1.3 million accrued for policyholder
dividends, respectively.
Furniture
and Equipment
Furniture and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated
depreciation, and are primarily depreciated using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
assets, generally three to ten years. Upon sale or retirement,
the cost of the asset and related accumulated depreciation are
eliminated from their respective accounts, and the resulting
gain or loss is included in income. Repairs and maintenance are
charged to operations when incurred.
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
The Company is required to test, at least annually, all existing
goodwill for impairment using a fair value approach, on a
reporting unit basis. The Companys annual assessment date
for goodwill impairment testing is October 1st. Also pursuant to
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, the Company is required to test for impairment
more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the asset might be impaired. Refer to
Note 16 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
for further information.
Income
Taxes
The Company provides for federal income taxes based on amounts
the Company believes it ultimately will owe. Inherent in the
provision for federal income taxes are estimates regarding the
deductibility of certain items and the realization of certain
tax credits. In the event the ultimate deductibility of certain
items or the realization of certain tax credits differs from
estimates, the Company may be required to significantly change
the provision for federal income taxes recorded in the
consolidated financial statements. Any such change could
significantly affect the amounts reported in the consolidated
statements of income.
The Company and its subsidiaries file a consolidated federal
income tax return in accordance with a tax sharing agreement,
whereby allocation is made primarily on a separate return basis
with current credit for any net operating losses or other items
utilized in the consolidated tax return.
The Company utilizes the asset and liability method of
accounting for income tax. Under this method, deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax
consequences attributable to differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities
and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit
carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured
using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in
the years in which those temporary differences are expected to
be recovered or settled. Under this method, the effect on
deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is
recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment
date. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to
reduce the deferred tax assets to the amounts which are more
likely than not to be realized.
At December 31, 2008, the Company had a net deferred tax
asset of $22.7 million. Realization of the deferred tax
asset is dependent upon generating sufficient taxable income to
absorb the applicable reversing temporary differences. A
valuation allowance is established if, based upon certain facts
and/or
circumstances, management believes some or all of certain tax
assets will not be realized. At December 31, 2008, the
Company established a valuation allowance of $8.7 million
related to unrealized losses on equity securities and other than
temporary impairments that, upon realization, could not be
offset by past or future capital gains, of which
$4.0 million was recorded as an adjustment to goodwill and
the remainder was recorded through the statement of operations.
The Company did not record a valuation allowance at
December 31, 2007. Management periodically evaluates the
adequacy of related valuation allowances, taking into account
90
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
open tax positions, tax assessments received and tax law
changes. This evaluation involves the use of estimates and a
high degree of management judgment. Actual results could differ
significantly from the estimates and interpretations used in
determining the current and deferred income tax liabilities and
reserves.
Stock
Options
The Company, through its 1995 and 2002 Amended and Restated
Stock Option Plans (the Plans), may grant options to
key executives and other members of management of the Company
and its subsidiaries in amounts not to exceed
2,000,000 shares of the Companys common stock
allocated for each plan. The Plans are administered by the
Compensation Committee (the Committee) of the Board
of Directors. Option shares may be exercised subject to the
terms of the Plans and the terms prescribed by the Committee at
the time of grant. Currently, the Plans options have
either five or ten-year terms and are exercisable and vest in
equal increments over the option term. Since 2003, the Company
has not issued any new stock options to employees.
Long Term
Incentive Plan
The Company maintains a Long Term Incentive Plan (the
LTIP). The LTIP provides participants with the
opportunity to earn cash and stock awards based upon the
achievement of specified financial goals over a three-year
performance period. At the end of a three-year performance
period, and if the performance targets for that period are
achieved, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
shall determine the amount of LTIP awards that are payable to
participants in the LTIP for the current performance period.
One-half of any LTIP award will be payable in cash and one-half
of the award will be payable in the form of a stock award. If
the Company achieves the performance targets for the three-year
performance period, payment of the cash portion of the award
would be made in three annual installments, with the first
payment being paid as of the end of the that performance period
and the remaining two payments to be paid in the subsequent two
years. Any unpaid portion of a cash award is subject to
forfeiture if the participant voluntarily leaves the Company or
is discharged for cause. The portion of the award to be paid in
the form of stock will be issued as of the end of that
performance period. The number of shares of the Companys
common stock subject to the stock award shall equal the dollar
amount of one-half of the LTIP award divided by the market value
of Companys common stock on the first date of the
beginning of the performance period. The stock awards shall be
made subject to the terms and conditions of the LTIP and Plans.
The Company accrues awards based upon the criteria set-forth and
approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors, as included in the LTIP. Refer to Note 13 -
Stock Options, Long Term Incentive Plan, and Deferred
Compensation Plan for related disclosure on the
Companys change in the three-year performance period for
its LTIP for the current plan years.
Deferred
Compensation Plan
The Company maintains an Executive Nonqualified Excess Plan (the
Excess Plan). The Excess Plan is intended to be a
nonqualified deferred compensation plan that will comply with
the provisions of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue
Code. The Company maintains the Excess Plan to provide a means
by which certain key management employees may elect to defer
receipt of current compensation from the Company in order to
provide retirement and other benefits, as provided for in the
Excess Plan. The Excess Plan is funded solely by the
participating employees and maintained primarily for the purpose
of providing deferred compensation benefits for eligible
employees.
Earnings
Per Share
Basic earnings per share are based on the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during the year, while
diluted earnings per share includes the weighted average number
of common shares and
91
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
potential dilution from shares issuable pursuant to stock
options or stock awards using the treasury stock method.
Outstanding options of 63,250, 98,807, and 112,959 for the
periods ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006,
respectively, have been excluded from the diluted earnings per
share, as they were anti-dilutive. Shares issuable pursuant to
stock options included in diluted earnings per share were 71,
16,495, and 126,660 for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007, and 2006, respectively. Shares related to the LTIP
included in diluted earnings per share were 184,697, 78,270, and
476,252 for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and
2006, respectively.
Comprehensive
Income
Comprehensive income (loss) encompasses all changes in
shareholders equity (except those arising from
transactions with shareholders) and includes net income, net
unrealized capital gains or losses on available for sale
securities, and net deferred derivative gains or losses on
hedging activity.
Derivative
Instruments
The Company has entered into interest rate swap transactions in
order to mitigate its interest rate risk on its debt
obligations. The Company accounts for these transactions in
accordance with SFAS No. 133 Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as
subsequently amended. These interest rate swap transactions have
been designated as cash flow hedges and are deemed highly
effective hedges under SFAS No. 133. Under
SFAS No. 133, these interest rate swap transactions
are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet and the
effective portion of the changes in fair value are accounted for
within other comprehensive income. Any portion of the hedge
deemed to be ineffective is recognized within the consolidated
statements of income. The Company does not use interest rate
swaps for trading or other speculative purposes.
In December 2005, the Company entered into a $6.0 million
convertible note receivable with an unaffiliated insurance
agency. The effective interest rate of the convertible note is
equal to the three-month LIBOR, plus 5.2% and is due
December 20, 2010. This note is convertible at the option
of the Company based upon a pre-determined formula. The
conversion feature of this note is considered an embedded
derivative pursuant to SFAS No. 133, and therefore is
accounted for separately from the note. At December 31,
2008, the estimated fair value of the derivative was not
material to the financial statements.
Fair
Value Disclosures
Due to the short-term nature of cash and cash equivalents,
premiums and agent balances receivable, reinsurance
recoverables, accrued interest, and other assets their estimated
fair value approximates their carrying value. Since debt and
equity securities are recorded in the financial statements at
their estimated fair value as securities available for sale
under SFAS No. 115 Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, their
carrying value is their estimated fair value. The Companys
long term debt, including its debentures, line of credit,
accrued expenses and other liabilities, reinsurance balances
payable are either short term in nature or based on current
market prices, so their estimated fair value approximates their
carrying value. In addition, the Companys derivative
instruments, as disclosed in Note 9
Derivative Instruments, are recorded in accordance with
SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, and therefore are
recorded at fair value.
Shareholder
Rights Plan (Rights Agreement)
On September 15, 1999, the Company declared a dividend of
one preferred share purchase right (a Right) for
each outstanding share of common stock. Each Right entitles the
registered holder to purchase
92
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
from the Company one one-hundredth of a share of Series A
Preferred Stock, at a price of $80.00 per one one-hundredth of a
share of preferred stock (the Purchase Price),
subject to adjustment.
The Rights are not exercisable until the earlier to occur of:
(i) ten business days following the date of public
announcement by the Company or a person or group
(Acquiring Person) that the Acquiring Person has
acquired beneficial ownership of fifteen percent or more of the
outstanding shares of common stock, (ii) ten business days
(or such later date as determined by the Board of Directors)
following the commencement of a tender offer or exchange offer,
or (iii) ten business days following the date on which a
majority of the Continuing Directors (as defined in the Rights
Agreement) informs the Company of the existence of an Acquiring
Person (the Distribution Date). Unless extended, the
Rights will expire on October 15, 2009. At any time prior
to the time an Acquiring Person becomes such, the Board of
Directors of the Company may redeem the Rights in whole, but not
in part, at a price of $.01 per Right. The effect of the
triggering of the Rights would be to significantly dilute the
ownership percentage of any person as described in
(i) through (iii) above.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS No. 157).
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value and establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. SFAS No. 157 also
requires expanded disclosures about (1) the extent to which
companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value,
(2) the methods and assumptions used to measure fair value
and (3) the effect of fair value measures on earnings.
SFAS No. 157 was effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007. The Company adopted SFAS 157
in the first quarter of 2008 and appropriate disclosures are
provided in Note 4 Fair Value
Measurements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115
(SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159
permits entities the option to measure many financial
instruments and certain other assets and liabilities at fair
value on an
instrument-by-instrument
basis as of specified election dates. This election is
irrevocable as to specific assets and liabilities. The objective
of SFAS No. 159 is to improve financial reporting and
reduce the volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring
related assets and liabilities differently.
SFAS No. 159 was effective for fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2007. The Company did not elect the fair
value option for existing eligible items under
SFAS No. 159; therefore it did not impact its
consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R),
Business Combinations
(SFAS No. 141(R)).
SFAS No. 141(R) provides revised guidance on how an
acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements,
the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and
any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. In addition, it
provides revised guidance on the recognition and measurement of
goodwill acquired in the business combination.
SFAS No. 141(R) also establishes disclosure
requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and
financial effects of the business combination.
SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for business combinations
completed on or after the beginning of the first annual
reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008.
The Company does not expect the provisions of
SFAS No. 141(R) to have a material impact on its
consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 51
(SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160
establishes accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS No. 160 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of
SFAS No. 160, but believes the adoption of
SFAS No. 160 will not impact its consolidated
financial condition or results of operations.
93
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities (SFAS No. 161).
SFAS No. 161 amends and expands the disclosure
requirements of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
SFAS No. 161 requires qualitative disclosures
about objectives and strategies for using derivatives,
quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of gains and
losses on derivative instruments and disclosures about
credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative
agreements. This statement is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008.
The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of
SFAS No. 161, but believes the adoption of
SFAS No. 161 will not materially impact its
consolidated financial condition or results of operations, but
may require additional disclosures related to any derivative or
hedging activities of the Company.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
(FSP)
FAS 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets. FSP
FAS 142-3
amends the factors that should be considered in developing
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful
life of a recognized intangible asset under
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets. This FSP is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company is in the
process of evaluating the impact of this FSP, but believes it
will not materially impact its consolidated financial condition
or results of operations.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162,
The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles. SFAS No. 162 identifies the
sources of accounting principles and provides entities with a
framework for selecting the principles used in preparation of
financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP.
The current GAAP hierarchy has been criticized because it is
directed to the auditor rather than the entity, it is complex,
and it ranks FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Concepts,
which are subject to the same level of due process as FASB
Statements of Financial Accounting Standards, below industry
practices that are widely recognized as generally accepted but
that are not subject to due process. The FASB believes the GAAP
hierarchy should be directed to entities because it is the
entity that is responsible for selecting accounting principles
for financial statements that are presented in conformity with
GAAP, not its auditors. SFAS No. 162 is effective
sixty days following the Securities and Exchange
Commissions approval of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411 The
Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles. The adoption of
SFAS No. 162 is not expected to have a material impact
on the Companys consolidated financial position and
results of operations.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 163,
Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance
Contracts-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 60.
Diversity exists in practice in accounting for financial
guarantee insurance contracts by insurance enterprises under
SFAS No. 60 Accounting and Reporting by
Insurance Enterprises. This results in inconsistencies
in the recognition and measurement of claim liabilities due to
differing views about when a loss has been incurred under
SFAS No. 5 Accounting for
Contingencies. This Statement requires that an
insurance enterprise recognize a claim liability prior to an
event of default when there is evidence that credit
deterioration has occurred in an insured financial obligation.
This Statement requires expanded disclosures about financial
guarantee insurance contracts. The accounting and disclosure
required under SFAS No. 163 will improve the quality
of information provided to users of financial statements. This
statement is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and all
interim periods within those fiscal years, except for some
disclosures about the insurance enterprises
risk-management activities. The Company is in the process of
evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 163, but believes
the adoption of SFAS No. 163 will not impact its
consolidated financial condition or results of operations, but
may require additional disclosures.
In January 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
No. EITF 99-20-1,
Amendments to the Impairment and Interest Income
Measurement Guidance of EITF Issue
No. 99-20
(FSP
EITF 99-20-1),
which is effective for interim and annual reporting periods
ending after December 15, 2008. FSP
EITF 99-20-1
amends
EITF 99-20,
Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment of
Purchased Beneficial Interests and
94
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Beneficial Interests That Continue to Be Held by a Transferor
in Securitized Financial Assets
(EITF 99-20).
FSP
EITF 99-20-1
eliminates the requirement that a holders best estimate of
cash flows be based upon those that a market participant would
use. Instead, FSP
EITF 99-20-1
requires that an other than temporary impairment be recognized
as a realized loss through earnings when it is probable there
has been an adverse change in the estimated cash flows from
those previously projected, which is consistent with the
impairment model in SFAS 115, Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. The
Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of FSP
EITF 99-20-1,
but believes the adoption of FSP
EITF 99-20-1
will not have a material impact its consolidated financial
condition or results of operations.
Following the close of business on July 31, 2008, the
Merger of Meadowbrook and ProCentury was completed. Under the
terms of the Merger Agreement, ProCentury shareholders were
entitled to receive, for each ProCentury common share, either
$20.00 in cash or Meadowbrook common stock based on a 2.50
exchange ratio, subject to adjustment as described within the
Merger Agreement. In accordance with the Merger Agreement, the
stock price used in determining the final cash and share
consideration portion of the purchase price was based on the
volume-weighted average sales price of a share of Meadowbrook
common stock for the
30-day
trading period ending on the sixth trading day before the
completion of the Merger, or $5.7326. Based upon the final
proration, the total purchase price was $227.2 million, of
which $99.1 million consisted of cash, $122.7 million
in newly issued common stock, and approximately
$5.4 million in transaction related costs. The total number
of new common shares issued for purposes of the stock portion of
the purchase price was 21.1 million shares.
The Merger was accounted for under the purchase method of
accounting, which resulted in initial goodwill of
$48.8 million equaling the excess of the purchase price
over the fair value of identifiable assets. Goodwill is not
amortized, but is subject to at least annual impairment testing.
Identifiable intangibles of $21.0 million and
$5.0 million were recorded related to agent relationships
and trade names, respectively.
As of December 31, 2008, the Company recorded an increase
to goodwill of $10.7 million. This increase was primarily
related to a $9.1 million adjustment to record a deferred
tax liability related to the other intangible assets related to
the agent relationships and the trade name. The remaining
increase to goodwill was primarily related to adjustments
recorded to reflect updated information on certain accruals and
related expenses as more refined information became available
during the Companys fourth quarter review.
ProCentury is a specialty insurance company, which primarily
underwrites general liability, commercial property,
environmental, garage keepers, commercial multi-peril,
commercial auto, surety, and marine insurance primarily in the
excess and surplus lines, or non-admitted market
through a select group of general agents. The excess and surplus
lines market provides insurance coverage for customers with
hard-to-place
risks that standard or admitted insurers typically choose not to
insure.
Five months of earnings of ProCentury are included in the
financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
The combined company maintained the Meadowbrook Insurance Group,
Inc. name and the New York Stock Exchange symbol of
MIG.
As described above, the purchase price consisted of both cash
and stock consideration. The value of the equity issued, in
accordance with SFAS No. 141 Business
Combinations,(SFAS 141) was based on
an average of the closing prices of Meadowbrook common shares
for the two trading days before through the two trading days
after Meadowbrook announced the final exchange ratio on
July 24, 2008. The purchase price also includes the
transaction costs incurred by Meadowbrook. The purchase price,
as initially calculated and as
95
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
calculated at December 31, 2008, after the Companys
fourth quarter review, was calculated as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Initially
|
|
|
Subsequent
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
Calculated
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
Adjusted at
|
|
|
|
at August 1,
|
|
|
Accounting
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Cash consideration portion of purchase price
|
|
$
|
99,073
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
99,073
|
|
Value of equity issued for stock consideration portion of
purchase price
|
|
|
122,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,725
|
|
Transaction related costs of Meadowbrook
|
|
|
5,383
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
5,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price
|
|
$
|
227,181
|
|
|
$
|
566
|
|
|
$
|
227,747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company obtained third-party valuations of certain fixed
assets and other intangible assets, which have been reflected
within the purchase price allocation. In accordance with
SFAS 141, the Company will continue to review and account
for any adjustments, up to a twelve month period following the
close of the Merger, in order to reflect updated information on
certain accruals, related expenses, or other potential valuation
adjustments, if further refined information becomes available.
96
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes the fair values of
ProCenturys assets and liabilities assumed upon the
closing of the Merger and as adjusted for subsequent purchase
accounting adjustments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Initially
|
|
|
Subsequent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculated at
|
|
|
Purchase
|
|
|
As Adjusted at
|
|
|
|
August 1,
|
|
|
Accounting
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
23,248
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
23,248
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
412,542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
412,542
|
|
Agent balances
|
|
|
36,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,497
|
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
27,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,435
|
|
Federal income taxes recoverable
|
|
|
7,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,386
|
|
Deferred taxes(1)
|
|
|
16,551
|
|
|
|
(9,100
|
)
|
|
|
7,451
|
|
Reinsurance recoverables
|
|
|
45,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,522
|
|
Prepaid insurance premiums
|
|
|
17,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,695
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
48,812
|
|
|
|
10,678
|
|
|
|
59,490
|
|
Other intangible assets
|
|
|
26,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,000
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
28,176
|
|
|
|
(1,012
|
)
|
|
|
27,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
689,864
|
|
|
$
|
566
|
|
|
$
|
690,430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
$
|
289,533
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
289,533
|
|
Unearned premiums
|
|
|
126,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,259
|
|
Reinsurance funds held and balances payable
|
|
|
13,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,911
|
|
Debentures
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
7,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
462,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
462,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price
|
|
$
|
227,181
|
|
|
$
|
566
|
|
|
$
|
227,747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Relates to a deferred tax liability adjustment in relation to
the other intangible assets related to the agent relationships
and the trade name. The deferred tax liability reflects the
value of the tax benefit related to the amortization embedded
within the value that is not deductible as a result of the stock
nature of the transaction. |
97
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table reflects the unaudited pro forma results for
the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, giving effect
to the Merger as if it had occurred as though the companies had
been combined as of the beginning of each of the periods
presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
561,049
|
|
|
$
|
578,585
|
|
Expenses(1)
|
|
|
520,211
|
|
|
|
503,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes and equity earnings
|
|
|
40,838
|
|
|
|
75,429
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
15,596
|
|
|
|
23,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
25,242
|
|
|
$
|
52,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per diluted share
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
$
|
0.97
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted(2)
|
|
|
58,153,667
|
|
|
|
54,224,955
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The pro forma results for the year ended December 31, 2008,
include approximately $7.0 million in expenses related to
transaction costs and restructuring charges ProCentury incurred
in conjunction with the Merger. |
|
(2) |
|
The weighted average number of diluted common shares has been
adjusted giving effect as if the shares issued in accordance
with the purchase price had been as of the beginning of each
period presented. |
The estimated fair value of investments in securities is
determined based on published market quotations and
broker/dealer quotations. The cost or amortized cost, gross
unrealized gains and losses, and estimated fair value of
investments in securities classified as available for sale at
December 31, 2008 and 2007 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Cost or
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Debt Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities issued by the U.S. Government and agencies
|
|
$
|
51,248
|
|
|
$
|
5,015
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
56,263
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
475,369
|
|
|
|
8,429
|
|
|
|
(3,876
|
)
|
|
|
479,922
|
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
146,605
|
|
|
|
1,840
|
|
|
|
(4,949
|
)
|
|
|
143,496
|
|
Mortgage and asset-backed securities
|
|
|
304,391
|
|
|
|
10,504
|
|
|
|
(8,093
|
)
|
|
|
306,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Debt Securities available for sale
|
|
|
977,613
|
|
|
|
25,788
|
|
|
|
(16,918
|
)
|
|
|
986,483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
12,945
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
(2,524
|
)
|
|
|
10,479
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
14,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,617
|
)
|
|
|
12,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity Securities available for sale
|
|
|
27,660
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
(5,141
|
)
|
|
|
22,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Securities available for sale
|
|
$
|
1,005,273
|
|
|
$
|
25,846
|
|
|
$
|
(22,059
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,009,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Cost or
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Debt Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities issued by the U.S. Government and agencies
|
|
$
|
53,436
|
|
|
$
|
1,541
|
|
|
$
|
(29
|
)
|
|
$
|
54,948
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
287,392
|
|
|
|
3,329
|
|
|
|
(323
|
)
|
|
|
290,398
|
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
116,406
|
|
|
|
1,941
|
|
|
|
(928
|
)
|
|
|
117,419
|
|
Mortgage and asset-backed securities
|
|
|
147,595
|
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
|
|
(615
|
)
|
|
|
147,991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Debt Securities available for sale
|
|
$
|
604,829
|
|
|
$
|
7,822
|
|
|
$
|
(1,895
|
)
|
|
$
|
610,756
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized appreciation and depreciation on available for
sale securities were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Unrealized appreciation
|
|
$
|
25,846
|
|
|
$
|
7,822
|
|
Unrealized depreciation
|
|
|
(22,059
|
)
|
|
|
(1,895
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation
|
|
|
3,787
|
|
|
|
5,927
|
|
Deferred federal income tax expense
|
|
|
(1,325
|
)
|
|
|
(2,075
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation on investments, net of deferred
federal income taxes
|
|
$
|
2,462
|
|
|
$
|
3,852
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized (losses) gains, including other than temporary
impairments, for the three years ended December 31, 2008,
2007, and 2006 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Realized (losses) gains:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross realized gains
|
|
$
|
352
|
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Gross realized losses
|
|
|
(3,266
|
)
|
|
|
(252
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities
|
|
|
(2,914
|
)
|
|
|
(164
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross realized gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross realized losses
|
|
|
(8,655
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity securities
|
|
|
(8,655
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized (losses) gains
|
|
$
|
(11,569
|
)
|
|
$
|
(164
|
)
|
|
$
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sales of fixed maturity securities available
for sale were $170.2 million, $222.4 million, and
$77.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007, and 2006, respectively.
At December 31, 2008, the amortized cost and estimated fair
value of available for sale debt securities, by contractual
maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from
contractual maturities because
99
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
certain borrowers may have the right to call or prepay
obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for Sale
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
114,600
|
|
|
$
|
114,608
|
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
209,903
|
|
|
|
213,088
|
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
296,164
|
|
|
|
300,295
|
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
52,555
|
|
|
|
51,690
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities, collateralized obligations and
asset-backed
|
|
|
304,391
|
|
|
|
306,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
977,613
|
|
|
$
|
986,483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income for the three years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 was as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net Investment Income Earned From:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities
|
|
$
|
33,906
|
|
|
$
|
23,746
|
|
|
$
|
19,376
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
1,105
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2,485
|
|
|
|
3,224
|
|
|
|
3,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross investment income
|
|
|
37,496
|
|
|
|
26,995
|
|
|
|
22,655
|
|
Less investment expenses
|
|
|
872
|
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$
|
36,624
|
|
|
$
|
26,400
|
|
|
$
|
22,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States Government obligations, municipal bonds, and bank
certificates of deposit aggregating $100.9 million and
$115.2 million were on deposit at December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively, with state regulatory authorities or
otherwise pledged as required by law or contract.
Other
Than Temporary Impairments of Securities and Unrealized Losses
on Investments
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had 365 and 160
securities that were in an unrealized loss position,
respectively. Of the securities held at December 31, 2008,
twenty-three had an aggregate $24.5 million and
$3.7 million fair value and unrealized loss, respectively,
and have been in an unrealized loss position for more than
twelve months. At December 31, 2007, 128 had an aggregate
$122.2 million and $1.3 million fair value and
unrealized loss, respectively, and have been in an unrealized
loss position for more than twelve months. Positive evidence
considered in reaching the Companys conclusion that the
investments in an unrealized loss position are not other than
temporarily impaired consisted of: 1) there were no
specific events which caused concerns; 2) there were no
past due interest payments; 3) the Companys ability
and intent to retain the investment for a sufficient amount of
time to allow an anticipated recovery in value; and
4) changes in fair value were considered normal in relation
to overall fluctuations in interest rates.
After the Companys review of its investment portfolio in
relation to this policy, the Company recorded a pre-tax realized
loss of $11.7 million, for the year ended December 31,
2008, related to certain preferred stock investments, including
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Lehman Brothers investments, as
well as several corporate bonds and asset-backed and
mortgage-backed securities.
100
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The fair value and amount of unrealized losses segregated by the
time period the investment has been in an unrealized loss
position were as follows for the years ended (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months
|
|
|
Greater than 12 months
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
with
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
with
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Debt Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities issued by U.S. Government and agencies
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
130,948
|
|
|
|
(3,516
|
)
|
|
|
4,778
|
|
|
|
(360
|
)
|
|
|
135,726
|
|
|
|
(3,876
|
)
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
72,962
|
|
|
|
(4,021
|
)
|
|
|
8,141
|
|
|
|
(928
|
)
|
|
|
81,103
|
|
|
|
(4,949
|
)
|
Mortgage and asset-backed securities
|
|
|
43,891
|
|
|
|
(5,701
|
)
|
|
|
11,600
|
|
|
|
(2,392
|
)
|
|
|
55,491
|
|
|
|
(8,093
|
)
|
Equity Securities:
|
|
|
21,166
|
|
|
|
(5,141
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,166
|
|
|
|
(5,141
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
268,967
|
|
|
$
|
(18,379
|
)
|
|
$
|
24,519
|
|
|
$
|
(3,680
|
)
|
|
$
|
293,486
|
|
|
$
|
(22,059
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months
|
|
|
Greater than 12 months
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
with
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
with
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Debt Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities issued by U.S. Government and agencies
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,963
|
|
|
$
|
(29
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,963
|
|
|
$
|
(29
|
)
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
19,400
|
|
|
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
45,177
|
|
|
|
(255
|
)
|
|
|
64,577
|
|
|
|
(323
|
)
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
15,564
|
|
|
|
(415
|
)
|
|
|
30,601
|
|
|
|
(513
|
)
|
|
|
46,165
|
|
|
|
(928
|
)
|
Mortgage and asset-backed securities
|
|
|
9,116
|
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
47,963
|
|
|
|
(520
|
)
|
|
|
57,079
|
|
|
|
(615
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
44,080
|
|
|
$
|
(578
|
)
|
|
$
|
129,704
|
|
|
$
|
(1,317
|
)
|
|
$
|
173,784
|
|
|
$
|
(1,895
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
Fair
Value Measurements
|
The Companys available for sale investment portfolio
consists primarily of debt securities, which are recorded in
accordance with SFAS No. 115, Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. The
change in fair value of these investments is recorded as a
component of other comprehensive income. In addition, the
Company has eight interest rate swaps that are designated as
cash flow hedges, in accordance with SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities. The Company records these interest rate
swap transactions at fair value on the balance sheet and the
effective portion of the changes in fair value are accounted for
within other comprehensive income.
The implementation of SFAS No. 157 resulted in
expanded disclosures about securities measured at fair value, as
discussed below.
101
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
SFAS No. 157 establishes a three-level hierarchy for
fair value measurements that distinguishes between market
participant assumptions based on market data obtained from
sources independent of the reporting entity (observable
inputs) and the reporting entitys own assumptions
about market participants assumptions (unobservable
inputs). The hierarchy level assigned to each security in
the Companys available for sale portfolio is based upon
its assessment of the transparency and reliability of the inputs
used in the valuation as of the measurement date. The three
hierarchy levels are defined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 Observable unadjusted quoted prices in
active markets for identical securities.
|
The fair value measurements of exchange-traded preferred and
common equities, and mutual funds were based on Level 1
inputs, or quoted market prices in active markets.
The fair value measurements of a slight portion of the
Companys fixed income securities, comprising 2.4% of the
fair value of the total fixed income portfolio, were based on
Level 1 inputs.
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Observable inputs other than quoted
prices in active markets for identical securities, including:
quoted prices in active markets for similar securities; quoted
prices for identical or similar securities in markets that are
not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable
for the security, (e.g., interest rates, yield curves observable
at commonly quoted intervals, volatilities, prepayment speeds,
credit risks, default rates); and inputs derived from or
corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other
means.
|
The fair value measurements of substantially all of the
Companys fixed income securities, comprising 96.4% of the
fair value of the total fixed income portfolio, were based on
Level 2 inputs.
The fair values of the Companys interest rate swaps were
based on Level 2 inputs.
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs, including the
reporting entitys own data, (e.g., cash flow estimates),
as long as there are no contrary data indicating market
participants would use different assumptions.
|
The fair value measurements for twenty-three securities,
comprising 1.2% of the fair value of the total fixed income
portfolio, were based on Level 3 inputs, due to the limited
availability of corroborating market data. Inputs for valuation
of these securities included benchmark yields, broker quotes,
and models based on cash flows and other inputs.
The fair values of securities were based on market values
obtained from an independent pricing service that were evaluated
using pricing models that vary by asset class and incorporate
available trade, bid, and other market information and price
quotes from well established independent broker-dealers. The
independent pricing service monitors market indicators, industry
and economic events, and for broker-quoted only securities,
obtains quotes from market makers or broker-dealers that it
recognizes to be market participants.
The following table presents the Companys assets and
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis,
classified by the SFAS No. 157 valuation hierarchy as
of December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
Other
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
Identical
|
|
Observable
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
Available-for-Sale
Securities
|
|
$
|
1,009,060
|
|
|
$
|
24,415
|
|
|
$
|
972,654
|
|
|
$
|
11,991
|
|
Derivatives interest rate
|
|
$
|
(8,940
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(8,940
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
102
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table presents changes in Level 3 available
for sale investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis
as of December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Measurement
|
|
|
|
Using
|
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
Inputs - Level 3
|
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
|
|
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings
|
|
|
96
|
|
Included in other comprehensive income
|
|
|
344
|
|
Purchases, issuances and settlements(1)
|
|
|
11,551
|
|
Transfers in and out of Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
11,991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of total gains or losses for the period included in
earnings (or changes in net assets) attributable to the change
in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at
the reporting date
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Relates to the invested assets acquired in conjunction with the
ProCentury merger, and a $6.1 million purchase of MBS. |
103
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
Liability
for Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses
|
The Company regularly updates its reserve estimates as new
information becomes available and further events occur that may
impact the resolution of unsettled claims. Changes in prior
reserve estimates are reflected in results of operations in the
year such changes are determined to be needed and recorded.
Activity in the reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses
is summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
$
|
540,002
|
|
|
$
|
501,077
|
|
|
$
|
458,677
|
|
Less reinsurance recoverables
|
|
|
198,461
|
|
|
|
198,422
|
|
|
|
187,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net balance, beginning of year
|
|
|
341,541
|
|
|
|
302,655
|
|
|
|
271,423
|
|
Additional net reserves acquired at August 1, 2008(1)
|
|
|
247,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total beginning reserves
|
|
|
589,280
|
|
|
|
302,655
|
|
|
|
271,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incurred related to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year
|
|
|
229,657
|
|
|
|
158,060
|
|
|
|
149,012
|
|
Prior years
|
|
|
(16,772
|
)
|
|
|
(7,091
|
)
|
|
|
(2,719
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total incurred
|
|
|
212,885
|
|
|
|
150,969
|
|
|
|
146,293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid related to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year
|
|
|
56,914
|
|
|
|
30,303
|
|
|
|
31,790
|
|
Prior years
|
|
|
119,920
|
|
|
|
81,780
|
|
|
|
83,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total paid
|
|
|
176,834
|
|
|
|
112,083
|
|
|
|
115,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net balance, end of year
|
|
|
625,331
|
|
|
|
341,541
|
|
|
|
302,655
|
|
Plus reinsurance recoverables
|
|
|
260,366
|
|
|
|
198,461
|
|
|
|
198,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
$
|
885,697
|
|
|
$
|
540,002
|
|
|
$
|
501,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amount represents the fair value of the reserves acquired from
ProCentury. Please refer to Note 2
ProCentury Merger for related disclosures. |
As a result of favorable development on prior accident
years reserves, the provision for loss and loss adjustment
expenses (LAE) decreased by $16.8 million,
$7.1 million, and $2.7 million in calendar years 2008,
2007, and 2006, respectively.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company reported
net favorable development on loss and LAE of $16.8 million,
or 2.8% of $589.3 million of beginning net loss and LAE
reserves, which includes $247.7 million of reserved
acquired from ProCentury at August 1, 2008. There were no
significant changes in the key assumptions utilized in the
analysis and calculations of the Companys reserves during
2008. The $16.8 million of favorable development reflects
favorable development of $12.7 million, $5.2 million,
$3.5 million, and $2.7 million related to
workers compensation programs, commercial auto programs,
other lines of business, and residual markets, respectively. The
2008 development also reflects unfavorable development of
$7.3 million related to the commercial multiple peril
programs.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company reported
net favorable development on loss and LAE of $7.1 million,
or 2.3% of net loss and LAE reserves. There were no significant
changes in the key assumptions utilized in the analysis and
calculations of the Companys reserves during 2007. The
$7.1 million of favorable development reflects favorable
development of $11.4 million, $6.0 million, and
$3.1 million related to workers compensation
programs, other lines of business, and residual markets,
respectively. The
104
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2007 development also reflects adverse development of
$12.5 million and $847,000 related to commercial multiple
peril and commercial auto programs, respectively.
For the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company reported
net favorable development on loss and LAE of $2.7 million,
or 1.0% of net loss and LAE reserves. There were no significant
changes in the key assumptions utilized in the analysis and
calculations of the Companys reserves during 2006. The
$2.7 million of favorable development reflects favorable
development of $920,000, $1.8 million, and $848,000 related
to workers compensation programs, other lines of business,
and residual markets, respectively. The 2006 development also
reflects adverse development of $283,000 and $596,000 related to
commercial multiple peril and commercial auto programs,
respectively.
Our Insurance Company Subsidiaries, including the insurance
company subsidiaries acquired in the ProCentury Merger, cede
insurance to reinsurers under pro-rata and excess-of-loss
contracts. These reinsurance arrangements diversify the
Companys business and minimize its exposure to large
losses or hazards of an unusual nature. The ceding of insurance
does not discharge the original insurer from its primary
liability to its policyholder. In the event that all or any of
the reinsuring companies are unable to meet their obligations,
the Company would be liable for such defaulted amounts.
Therefore, the Company is subject to credit risk with respect to
the obligations of its reinsurers. In order to minimize its
exposure to significant losses from reinsurer insolvencies, the
Company evaluates the financial condition of its reinsurers and
monitors the economic characteristics of the reinsurers on an
ongoing basis. The Company also assumes insurance from other
domestic insurers and reinsurers. Based upon managements
evaluation, they have concluded the reinsurance agreements
entered into by the Company transfer both significant timing and
underwriting risk to the reinsurer and, accordingly, are
accounted for as reinsurance under the provisions of
SFAS No. 113 Accounting and Reporting for
Reinsurance for Short-Duration and Long-Duration
Contracts.
The Company receives ceding commissions in conjunction with
reinsurance activities. These ceding commissions are offset
against the related underwriting expenses and were
$12.6 million, $10.2 million, and $9.2 million in
2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had reinsurance
recoverables for paid and unpaid losses of $268.7 million
and $199.5 million, respectively.
In regard to the Companys excess-of-loss reinsurance, the
Company manages its credit risk on reinsurance recoverables by
reviewing the financial stability, A.M. Best rating,
capitalization, and credit worthiness of prospective and
existing risk-sharing partners. The Company generally does not
seek collateral where the reinsurer is rated
A− or better by A.M. Best, has
$500 million or more in surplus, and is admitted in the
state of Michigan. As of December 31, 2008, the largest
unsecured reinsurance recoverable is due from an admitted
reinsurer with an A+ A.M. Best rating and
accounts for 27.8% of the total recoverable for paid and unpaid
losses.
In regard to the Companys risk-sharing partners (client
captive or
rent-a-captive
quota-share non-admitted reinsurers), the Company manages credit
risk on reinsurance recoverables by reviewing the financial
stability, capitalization, and credit worthiness of prospective
or existing reinsurers or partners. The Company customarily
collateralizes reinsurance balances due from non-admitted
reinsurers through funds withheld trusts or stand-by letters of
credit issued by highly rated banks.
To date, the Company has not, in the aggregate, experienced
material difficulties in collecting reinsurance recoverables.
The Company has historically maintained an allowance for the
potential exposure to the uncollectibility of certain
reinsurance balances. At the end of each quarter, an analysis of
these exposures is conducted to
105
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
determine the potential exposure to uncollectibility. While
management believes the allowances to be adequate, no assurance
can be given, however, regarding the future ability of any of
the Companys risk-sharing partners to meet their financial
obligations.
The Company maintains an excess-of-loss reinsurance treaty
designed to protect against large or unusual loss and loss
adjustment expense activity. The Company determines the
appropriate amount of reinsurance primarily based on the
Companys evaluation of the risks accepted, but also
considers analysis prepared by consultants and reinsurers and on
market conditions including the availability and pricing of
reinsurance. To date, there have been no material disputes with
the Companys excess-of-loss reinsurers. No assurance can
be given, however, regarding the future ability of any of the
Companys excess-of-loss reinsurers to meet their
obligations.
The following are descriptions of the reinsurance treaties the
Company maintains for its insurance company subsidiary, Star,
and Stars subsidiaries. These treaties, with the exception
of the property reinsurance treaty, do not pertain to ProCentury
and its subsidiaries. Treaties pertaining to ProCentury and its
subsidiaries are separately described further below.
Under the workers compensation reinsurance treaty,
reinsurers are responsible for 100% of each loss in excess of
$350,000, up to $5.0 million for each claimant, on losses
occurring prior to April 1, 2005. The Company increased its
retention from $350,000 to $750,000, for losses occurring on or
after April 1, 2005 and to $1.0 million for losses
occurring on or after April 1, 2006. In addition, there is
coverage for loss events involving more than one claimant up to
$75.0 million per occurrence in excess of retentions of
$1.0 million. In a loss event involving more than one
claimant, the per claimant coverage is $9.0 million in
excess of retentions of $1.0 million.
Under the core liability reinsurance treaty, the reinsurers are
responsible for 100% of each loss in excess of $350,000, up to
$2.0 million per occurrence on policies effective prior to
June 1, 2005. The Company increased its retention from
$350,000 to $500,000, for losses occurring on policies effective
on or after June 1, 2005. Effective June 1, 2008, the
Company expanded its clash protection to cover all casualty
lines other than workers compensation. The Company
maintained $3.0 million of reinsurance clash coverage in
excess of $2.0 million to cover amounts that may be in
excess of the policy limit, such as expenses associated with the
settlement of claims or a loss where two or more policies are
involved in a common occurrence. In addition, effective
June 1, 2008, the Company purchased an awards made cover
for judgments in excess of policy limits or extra contractual
obligations arising under all casualty lines other than
workers compensation. Reinsurers are responsible for 100%
of each award in excess of $500,000 up to $10.0 million.
Historically, the Company had separate clash provisions for
various casualty treaties, but now will be protected by one
common treaty.
Effective June 1, 2006, the Company purchased a
$5.0 million excess cover to support its umbrella business,
which is renewed on an annual basis. This business had
previously been reinsured through various semi-automatic
agreements but now is protected by one common treaty. The
Company has no retention when the umbrella limit is in excess of
the primary limit, but does warrant it will maintain a minimum
liability of $1.0 million if the primary limit does not
respond or is exhausted.
The Company has a separate treaty to cover liability
specifically related to commercial trucking, whereby reinsurers
are responsible for 100% of each loss in excess of $350,000, up
to $1.0 million for losses occurring prior to
December 1, 2005. The Company increased its retention from
$350,000 to $500,000 for losses occurring on or after
December 1, 2005. Effective December 1, 2007, the
Company entered into a new $1.0 million in excess of
$1.0 million per occurrence layer for additional capacity
for its commercial trucking business, which is reinsured 100%.
In addition, the Company purchased an additional
$1.0 million of reinsurance clash coverage. The Company
established a separate treaty to cover liability related to
chemical distributors and repackagers, whereby reinsurers are
responsible for 100% of each loss in excess of $500,000, up to
$1.0 million, applied separately to general liability and
auto liability. This treaty was terminated on a run-off basis on
August 1, 2006. The exposures are covered under the core
casualty treaty for policies effective August 1, 2006 and
after.
106
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Additionally, the Company has a separate treaty structure to
cover liability related to agricultural business. The reinsurer
is responsible for 100% of each loss in excess of $500,000, up
to $1.0 million for casualty losses and up to
$5.0 million, for property losses occurring on or after
May 1, 2006. This treaty also provides an additional
$1.0 million of reinsurance clash coverage for the casualty
lines. The clash coverage expired May 31, 2008 and is now
protected by the awards and clash coverage treaty described
above.
Under the property reinsurance treaty, reinsurers are
responsible for 100% of the amount of each loss in excess of
$500,000, up to $5.0 million per location. In addition,
there is coverage for loss events involving multiple locations
up to $25.0 million after the Company has incurred $750,000
in loss. Effective December 1, 2008, the Company placed its
property reinsurance structure inclusive of all carriers
including ProCentury and its subsidiaries. The Company increased
its retention from $500,000 per risk to $1.0 million per
risk and now has capacity up to $10.0 million per location.
Effective December 1, 2008, Company has protection for loss
events involving multiple locations up to $26.0 million after
the Company has incurred a $4.0 million loss.
Centurys catastrophe reinsurance limit of
$20.0 million excess of a $4.0 million retention
remains in place and applies separately for loss events through
December 31, 2008.
On May 1, 2008, the Company renewed its existing
reinsurance agreement that provides reinsurance coverage for
policies written in the Companys public entity excess
liability program. The agreement provides reinsurance coverage
of $4.0 million in excess of $1.0 million for each
occurrence in excess of the policyholders self-insured
retentions.
In addition, the Company maintains a reinsurance agreement that
provides $10.0 million in excess of $5.0 million for
each occurrence, which is above the underlying $5.0 million
of coverage for the Companys public entity excess
liability program. Under this agreement, reinsurers are
responsible for 100% of each loss in excess of $5.0 million
for all lines, except workers compensation, which is
covered by the Companys core catastrophic workers
compensation treaty structure up to $75.0 million per
occurrence.
On December 1, 2007, the Company entered into a reinsurance
agreement that provides reinsurance coverage for excess
workers compensation business. Reinsurers are responsible
for 80% of the difference between $2.0 million and the
policyholders self-insured retention for each occurrence.
Reinsurers are then responsible for 100% of $8.0 million in
excess of $2.0 million for each occurrence. Coverage in
excess of $10.0 million up to $50.0 million per
occurrence is covered by the Companys core catastrophic
workers compensation treaty.
Additionally, certain small programs have separate reinsurance
treaties in place, which limit the Companys exposure to
$350,000 or less.
Facultative reinsurance is purchased for property values in
excess of $5.0 million, casualty limits in excess of
$2.0 million, or for coverage not covered by a treaty.
As previously indicated, the Company closed on the Merger with
ProCentury on July 31, 2008. At the time of the closing,
ProCentury had its own reinsurance agreements in place and those
agreements have remained in effect following completion of the
Merger. Star Insurance Company has been named as an additional
reinsured under ProCenturys in force reinsurance
agreements effective August 1, 2008.
Under ProCenturys property reinsurance treaties,
reinsurers are responsible for 82.0% of each loss in excess of
$500,000 up to $1.0 million and 100% of each loss excess of
$1.0 million, up to $7.5 million per risk. This
agreement was terminated on November 30, 2008, and is now
part of a consolidated treaty. Additional coverage of up to
$15.0 million per risk is available through an automatic
facultative agreement. Facultative reinsurance is purchased
separately for property values in excess of $15.0 million.
The property portfolio is protected for loss events involving
multiple locations up to $16.0 million after ProCentury has
incurred $4.0 million in loss for any one event. The
catastrophe coverage was terminated December 31, 2008 and
is now part of a consolidated treaty.
107
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Under ProCenturys casualty reinsurance structure,
reinsurers are responsible for 50% of each loss occurrence in
excess of $500,000 up to $1.0 million. In addition,
ProCentury maintains $20.0 million of reinsurance clash
coverage in excess of $1.0 million to cover amounts that
may be in excess of the policy limit, such as expenses
associated with the settlement of claims or a loss where two or
more policies are involved in a common occurrence, including
judgments in excess of policy limits and claims for bad faith.
Century also maintains reinsurance protection for excess and
umbrella limits issued up to $5.0 million. Reinsurers are
responsible for 90% of the first $1.0 million and 100% of
the next $4.0 million.
In addition, ProCentury maintains a terrorism aggregate excess
of loss reinsurance treaty whereby reinsurers are responsible
for 100% of $8.5 million in excess of $8.0 million
each occurrence.
ProCentury maintains a variable quota share reinsurance treaty
for its ocean marine business which allows for a proportionate
sharing of premium and losses. The percentage of ceded
reinsurance increases as the limit on the policy increases. The
maximum policy limit is $6.0 million and reinsurers are
responsible for limits up to $5.0 million while the
Companys retention is limited to its proportional share up
to $1.0 million.
In addition, ProCentury maintains a variable quota share
reinsurance treaty for surety bonds underwritten by ProCentury.
The percentage of ceded reinsurance increases as the bond value
increases. The maximum bond value under the treaty is
$10.0 million and reinsurers are responsible for limits up
to $7.5 million, while the Companys retention is limited
to its proportional share up to $2.5 million.
Effective August 1, 2008, Star transitioned as the assuming
reinsurer for certain bond business underwritten by Evergreen
National Indemnity and Continental Heritage Insurance Company.
Stars maximum liability under these agreements is
$500,000. Prior to August 1, 2008, ProCentury acted as the
assuming reinsurer.
ProCentury has a separate treaty to cover liability specifically
related to environmental contracting exposures. Reinsurers are
responsible for a 50% quota share participation of the first
$1.0 million and varying quota share participations for
limits excess of $1.0 million up to $6.0 million.
ProCenturys fixed retention under the variable quota share
is $500,000.
ProCentury also has separate treaties in place to cover certain
small programs that limits exposure to $500,000 or less.
Reconciliations of direct to net premiums, on a written and
earned basis, for 2008, 2007, and 2006 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Written
|
|
|
Earned
|
|
|
Written
|
|
|
Earned
|
|
|
Written
|
|
|
Earned
|
|
|
Direct
|
|
$
|
449,618
|
|
|
$
|
441,709
|
|
|
$
|
307,266
|
|
|
$
|
266,049
|
|
|
$
|
246,985
|
|
|
$
|
251,288
|
|
Assumed(1)
|
|
|
8,065
|
|
|
|
14,073
|
|
|
|
39,184
|
|
|
|
71,050
|
|
|
|
83,887
|
|
|
|
75,999
|
|
Ceded
|
|
|
(82,489
|
)
|
|
|
(86,061
|
)
|
|
|
(66,239
|
)
|
|
|
(68,902
|
)
|
|
|
(68,204
|
)
|
|
|
(72,367
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
$
|
375,194
|
|
|
$
|
369,721
|
|
|
$
|
280,211
|
|
|
$
|
268,197
|
|
|
$
|
262,668
|
|
|
$
|
254,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One reinsurer, with a financial strength rating of
A+ (Superior) rated by A.M. Best, accounts for
12.1% of ceded premiums in 2008. |
|
(1) |
|
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006,
$925,000, $31.0 million, and $72.6 million, relates to
assumed business the Company manages directly, respectively. The
related transactions of this business are processed through the
Companys internal systems and related controls. In
addition, the Company does not assume any foreign reinsurance. |
108
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company defines its operations as specialty insurance
operations and agency operations based upon differences in
products and services. The separate financial information of
these segments is consistent with the way results are regularly
evaluated by management in deciding how to allocate resources
and in assessing performance. Intersegment revenue is eliminated
upon consolidation. It would be impracticable for the Company to
determine the allocation of assets between the two segments.
Specialty
Insurance Operations
The specialty insurance operations segment, which includes
insurance company specialty programs and fee-for-service
specialty or managed programs, focuses on specialty or niche
insurance business. Specialty insurance operations provide
services and coverages tailored to meet specific requirements of
defined client groups and their members. These services include
risk management consulting, claims administration and handling,
loss control and prevention, and reinsurance placement, along
with various types of property and casualty insurance coverage,
including workers compensation, commercial multiple peril,
general liability, commercial auto liability, excess and surplus
lines, environmental, garage keepers, surety, legal,
professional liability, errors & omissions, inland
marine, and other lines of business. Insurance coverage is
provided primarily to associations or similar groups of members
and to specified classes of business of the Companys
agents. The Company recognizes revenue related to the services
and coverages the specialty insurance operations provides within
seven categories: net earned premiums, management fees, claims
fees, loss control fees, reinsurance placement, investment
income, and net realized gains (losses).
The Company included the results of operations related to
ProCentury within the specialty insurance operations. Therefore,
specialty insurance operations include five months of operations
for ProCentury.
Agency
Operations
The Company earns commissions through the operation of its
retail property and casualty insurance agencies, which are
located in Michigan, California, and Florida. The agency
operations produce commercial, personal lines, life, and
accident and health insurance, for more than fifty unaffiliated
insurance carriers. The agency produces an immaterial amount of
business for its affiliated Insurance Company Subsidiaries.
109
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table sets forth the segment results (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earned premiums
|
|
$
|
369,721
|
|
|
$
|
268,197
|
|
|
$
|
254,920
|
|
Management fees
|
|
|
21,168
|
|
|
|
23,963
|
|
|
|
18,714
|
|
Claims fees
|
|
|
8,879
|
|
|
|
9,025
|
|
|
|
8,776
|
|
Loss control fees
|
|
|
2,069
|
|
|
|
2,151
|
|
|
|
2,216
|
|
Reinsurance placement
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
35,888
|
|
|
|
25,487
|
|
|
|
21,115
|
|
Net realized (losses) gains
|
|
|
(11,422
|
)
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty insurance operations
|
|
|
427,031
|
|
|
|
329,902
|
|
|
|
306,545
|
|
Agency operations
|
|
|
11,064
|
|
|
|
11,316
|
|
|
|
12,285
|
|
Holding Company interest income earned
|
|
|
736
|
|
|
|
913
|
|
|
|
960
|
|
Intersegment revenue
|
|
|
(1,004
|
)
|
|
|
(1,396
|
)
|
|
|
(1,554
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated revenue
|
|
$
|
437,827
|
|
|
$
|
340,735
|
|
|
$
|
318,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty insurance operations
|
|
$
|
60,897
|
|
|
$
|
47,898
|
|
|
$
|
38,292
|
|
Agency operations(1)
|
|
|
1,142
|
|
|
|
2,087
|
|
|
|
2,609
|
|
Non-allocated expenses
|
|
|
(18,244
|
)
|
|
|
(10,598
|
)
|
|
|
(9,396
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated pre-tax income
|
|
$
|
43,795
|
|
|
$
|
39,387
|
|
|
$
|
31,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Companys agency operations include an allocation of
corporate overhead, which includes expenses associated with
accounting, information services, legal, and other corporate
services. The corporate overhead allocation excludes those
expenses specific to the holding company. For the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, the allocation of
corporate overhead to the agency operations segment was
$2.8 million, $2.8 million, and $3.3 million,
respectively. |
The following table sets forth the non-allocated expenses
included in pre-tax income (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Holding company expenses
|
|
$
|
(4,253
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,638
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,830
|
)
|
Amortization
|
|
|
(6,310
|
)
|
|
|
(1,930
|
)
|
|
|
(590
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(7,681
|
)
|
|
|
(6,030
|
)
|
|
|
(5,976
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(18,244
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,598
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,396
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit
Facilities
On July 31, 2008, the Company executed $100 million in
senior credit facilities (the Credit Facilities).
The Credit Facilities included a $65.0 million term loan
facility, which was fully funded upon the closing of its Merger
with ProCentury and a $35.0 million revolving credit
facility, which was partially funded upon closing of the Merger.
As of December 31, 2008, the outstanding balance on its
term loan facility was
110
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
$60.25 million. The Company did not have an outstanding
balance on its revolving credit facility as of December 31,
2008. The undrawn portion of the revolving credit facility is
available to finance working capital and for general corporate
purposes, including but not limited to, surplus contributions to
its Insurance Company Subsidiaries to support premium growth or
strategic acquisitions. These Credit Facilities replaced the
Companys prior revolving credit agreement, which was
terminated upon the execution of the Credit Facilities. At
December 31, 2007, the Company did not have an outstanding
balance on its former revolving line of credit.
The principal amount outstanding under the Credit Facilities
provides for interest at LIBOR, plus the applicable margin, or
at the Companys option, the base rate. The base rate is
defined as the higher of the lending banks prime rate or
the Federal Funds rate, plus 0.50%, plus the applicable margin.
The applicable margin is determined by the consolidated
indebtedness to consolidated total capital ratio. In addition,
the Credit Facilities provide for an unused facility fee ranging
between twenty basis points and forty basis points, based on our
consolidated leverage ratio as defined by the Credit Facilities.
At December 31, 2008, the interest rate on the
Companys term loan was 5.95%, which consisted of a fixed
rate of 3.95%, as described in Note 9
Derivative Instruments, plus an applicable margin of
2.00%.
The debt covenants applicable to the Credit Facilities consist
of: (1) minimum consolidated net worth starting at eighty
percent of pro forma consolidated net worth after giving effect
to the acquisition of ProCentury, with quarterly increases
thereafter, (2) minimum Risk Based Capital Ratio for Star
of 1.75 to 1.00, (3) maximum permitted consolidated
leverage ratio of 0.35 to 1.00, (4) minimum consolidated
debt service coverage ratio of 1.25 to 1.00, and
(5) minimum A.M. Best rating of B++. As of
December 31, 2008, the Company was in compliance with these
debt covenants.
Debentures
The following table summarizes the principal amounts and
variables associated with the Companys debentures (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/31/08
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
Description
|
|
Callable
|
|
|
Year Due
|
|
|
Interest Rate Terms
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2033
|
|
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 4.05%
|
|
|
5.51
|
%
|
|
$
|
10,310
|
|
Senior debentures
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2034
|
|
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 4.00%
|
|
|
6.15
|
%
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
Senior debentures
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
2034
|
|
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 4.20%
|
|
|
6.35
|
%
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2035
|
|
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 3.58%
|
|
|
5.58
|
%
|
|
|
20,620
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures(2)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
2032
|
|
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 4.00%
|
|
|
6.21
|
%
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures(2)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
2033
|
|
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 4.10%
|
|
|
6.25
|
%
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
80,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The underlying three-month LIBOR rate varies as a result of the
interest rate reset dates used in determining the three-month
LIBOR rate, which varies for each long-term debt item each
quarter. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the junior subordinated debentures acquired in
conjunction with the Merger. |
The Company received a total of $53.3 million in net
proceeds from the issuances of the above long-term debt, of
which $26.2 million was contributed to the surplus of its
Insurance Company Subsidiaries and the remaining balance was
used for general corporate purposes. Associated with the
issuance of the above long-term debt, the Company incurred
approximately $1.7 million in issuance costs for
commissions paid to the placement agents in the transactions.
111
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The issuance costs associated with these debentures have been
capitalized and are included in other assets on the balance
sheet. As of June 30, 2007, these issuance costs were being
amortized over a seven year period as a component of interest
expense. The seven year amortization period represented
managements best estimate of the estimated useful life of
the bonds related to both the senior debentures and junior
subordinated debentures. Beginning July 1, 2007, the
Company reevaluated its best estimate and determined a five year
amortization period to be a more accurate representation of the
estimated useful life. Therefore, this change in amortization
period from seven years to five years has been applied
prospectively beginning July 1, 2007.
The junior subordinated debentures issued in 2003 and 2005 were
issued in conjunction with the issuance of $10.0 million
and $20.0 million in mandatory redeemable trust preferred
securities to a trust formed by an institutional investor from
the Companys unconsolidated subsidiary trusts,
respectively.
In relation to the junior subordinated debentures acquired in
conjunction with the Merger, the Company also acquired the
remaining unamortized portion of the capitalized issuance costs
associated with these debentures. The remaining unamortized
portion of the issuance costs acquired was $625,000. These are
included in other assets on the balance sheet. The remaining
balance is being amortized over a five year period beginning
August 1, 2008, as a component of interest expense.
The junior subordinated debentures are unsecured obligations of
the Company and are junior to the right of payment to all senior
indebtedness of the Company. The Company has guaranteed that the
payments made to both Trusts will be distributed by the Trusts
to the holders of the trust preferred securities.
The Company estimates that the fair value of the above mentioned
junior subordinated debentures and senior debentures issued
approximate the gross proceeds of cash received at the time of
issuance.
|
|
9.
|
Derivative
Instruments
|
The Company has entered into interest rate swap transactions to
mitigate its interest rate risk on its existing debt
obligations. The Company accrues for these transactions in
accordance with SFAS No. 133 Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as
subsequently amended. These interest rate swap transactions have
been designated as cash flow hedges and are deemed highly
effective hedges under SFAS No. 133. In accordance
with SFAS No. 133, these interest rate swap
transactions are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet and
the effective portion of the changes in fair value are accounted
for within other comprehensive income. The interest differential
to be paid or received is accrued and recognized as an
adjustment to interest expense.
The following table summarizes the rates and amounts associated
with the Companys interest rate swaps (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount at
|
|
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
|
|
Counterparty
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
Effective Date
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Debt Instrument
|
|
Interest Rate Terms
|
|
Fixed Rate
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
10/06/2005
|
|
|
|
05/24/2009
|
|
|
Senior debentures
|
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 4.20%
|
|
|
8.925
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
10/06/2005
|
|
|
|
09/16/2010
|
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 3.58%
|
|
|
8.340
|
%
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
04/23/2008
|
|
|
|
05/24/2011
|
|
|
Senior debentures
|
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 4.20%
|
|
|
7.720
|
%
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
04/23/2008
|
|
|
|
06/30/2013
|
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 4.05%
|
|
|
8.020
|
%
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
04/29/2008
|
|
|
|
04/29/2013
|
|
|
Senior debentures
|
|
Three-month LIBOR, plus 4.00%
|
|
|
7.940
|
%
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
07/31/2008
|
|
|
|
07/31/2013
|
|
|
Term loan(1)
|
|
Three-month LIBOR
|
|
|
3.950
|
%
|
|
|
60,250
|
|
|
08/15/2008
|
|
|
|
08/15/2013
|
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures(2)
|
|
Three-month LIBOR
|
|
|
3.780
|
%
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
09/04/2008
|
|
|
|
09/04/2013
|
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures(2)
|
|
Three-month LIBOR
|
|
|
3.790
|
%
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
112
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Relates to the Companys term loan, which has an effective
date of July 31, 2008 and an expiration date of
July 31, 2013. The Company is required to make fixed rate
interest payments on the current balance of the term loan,
amortizing in accordance with the term loan amortization
schedule. The Company fixed only the variable interest portion
of the loan. The actual interest payments associated with the
term loan also include an additional rate of 2.00% in accordance
with the credit agreement, as of December 31, 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
Relates to the debentures acquired from the ProCentury merger.
The Company fixed only the variable interest portion of the
debt. The actual interest payments associated with the
debentures also include an additional rate of 4.10% and 4.00% on
the $10.0 million and $15.0 million debentures,
respectively. |
In relation to the above interest rate swaps, the net interest
expense incurred for the year ended December 31, 2008, was
approximately $763,000. The net interest income received for the
years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, was approximately
$172,000 and $67,000, respectively.
The total fair value of the interest rate swaps as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007 was approximately
($8.9 million) and ($545,000), respectively. Accumulated
other comprehensive income at December 31, 2008 and 2007,
included accumulated loss on the cash flow hedge, net of taxes,
of approximately $5.5 million and $484,000, respectively.
In December 2005, the Company entered into a $6.0 million
convertible note receivable with an unaffiliated insurance
agency. The effective interest rate of the convertible note is
equal to the three-month LIBOR, plus 5.2% and is due
December 20, 2010. This agency has been a producer for the
Company for over ten years. As security for the loan, the
borrower granted the Company a security interest in its
accounts, cash, general intangibles, and other intangible
property. Also, the shareholder then pledged 100% of the common
shares of three insurance agencies, the common shares owned by
the shareholder in another agency, and has executed a personal
guaranty. This note is convertible at the option of the Company
based upon a pre-determined formula. The conversion feature of
this note is considered an embedded derivative pursuant to
SFAS No. 133, and therefore is accounted for
separately from the note. At December 31, 2008, the
estimated fair value of the derivative was not material to the
financial statements.
|
|
10.
|
Regulatory
Matters and Rating Issues
|
A significant portion of the Companys consolidated assets
represents assets of its Insurance Company Subsidiaries that may
not be transferable to the holding company in the form of
dividends, loans or advances. The restriction on the
transferability to the holding company from its Insurance
Company Subsidiaries is limited by regulatory guidelines. These
guidelines specify that dividends can be paid only from
unassigned surplus and only to the extent that all dividends in
the current twelve months do not exceed the greater of 10% of
total statutory surplus as of the end of the prior fiscal year
or 100% of the statutory net income for the prior year, less any
dividends paid in the past twelve months. Using these criteria,
the available ordinary dividend available to be paid from the
insurance company subsidiaries during 2008 is
$46.2 million. The Insurance Company Subsidiaries, which
include the insurance companies acquired in the ProCentury
merger, have paid ordinary dividends of $46.2 million in
2008. In 2009, the Companys Insurance Company Subsidiaries
have the capacity to pay ordinary dividends of
$39.5 million without prior regulatory approval. In
addition to ordinary dividends, the Insurance Company
Subsidiaries have the capacity to pay $31.1 million of
extraordinary dividends with prior regulatory approval. The
Insurance Company Subsidiaries ability to pay future
dividends without advance regulatory approval is dependent upon
maintaining a positive level of unassigned surplus, which in
turn, is dependent upon the Insurance Company Subsidiaries
generating net income. No statutory dividends were paid from the
Companys Insurance Company Subsidiaries during 2007.
113
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Summarized 2008 and 2007 statutory basis information for the
primary insurance subsidiaries, which differs from generally
accepted accounting principles, is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ProCentury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
2008:
|
|
Star
|
|
|
Savers
|
|
|
Williamsburg
|
|
|
Ameritrust
|
|
|
Century
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Statutory capital and surplus
|
|
$
|
199,889
|
|
|
$
|
42,718
|
|
|
$
|
21,945
|
|
|
$
|
19,177
|
|
|
$
|
122,948
|
|
|
$
|
31,228
|
|
RBC authorized control level
|
|
$
|
36,244
|
|
|
$
|
6,499
|
|
|
$
|
3,382
|
|
|
$
|
2,893
|
|
|
$
|
33,918
|
|
|
$
|
2,860
|
|
Statutory net income
|
|
$
|
27,179
|
|
|
$
|
6,546
|
|
|
$
|
2,783
|
|
|
$
|
2,671
|
|
|
$
|
(11,227
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007:
|
|
Star
|
|
|
Savers
|
|
|
Williamsburg
|
|
|
Ameritrust
|
|
|
Statutory capital and surplus
|
|
$
|
188,381
|
|
|
$
|
41,633
|
|
|
$
|
21,846
|
|
|
$
|
18,989
|
|
RBC authorized control level
|
|
$
|
34,419
|
|
|
$
|
6,278
|
|
|
$
|
3,272
|
|
|
$
|
2,786
|
|
Statutory net income
|
|
$
|
13,893
|
|
|
$
|
5,460
|
|
|
$
|
2,775
|
|
|
$
|
2,479
|
|
Insurance operations are subject to various leverage tests
(e.g., premium to statutory surplus ratios), which are evaluated
by regulators and rating agencies. The Companys targets
for gross and net written premium to statutory surplus are 2.8
to 1.0 and 2.25 to 1.0, respectively. As of December 31,
2008, on a statutory consolidated basis, including the insurance
company subsidiaries acquired in the ProCentury merger, the
gross and net premium leverage ratios were 1.4 to 1.0 and 1.2 to
1.0, respectively.
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners
(NAIC) has adopted a risk-based capital
(RBC) formula to be applied to all property and
casualty insurance companies. The formula measures required
capital and surplus based on an insurance companys
products and investment portfolio and is used as a tool to
evaluate the capital of regulated companies. The RBC formula is
used by state insurance regulators to monitor trends in
statutory capital and surplus for the purpose of initiating
regulatory action. In general, an insurance company must submit
a calculation of its RBC formula to the insurance department of
its state of domicile as of the end of the previous calendar
year. These laws require increasing degrees of regulatory
oversight and intervention as an insurance companys RBC
declines. The level of regulatory oversight ranges from
requiring the insurance company to inform and obtain approval
from the domiciliary insurance commissioner of a comprehensive
financial plan for increasing its RBC to mandatory regulatory
intervention requiring an insurance company to be placed under
regulatory control in a rehabilitation or liquidation proceeding.
The RBC Model Act provides for four different levels of
regulatory attention depending on the ratio of the
companys total adjusted capital, defined as the total of
its statutory capital, surplus and asset valuation reserve, to
its risk-based capital.
At December 31, 2008, each of our Insurance Company
Subsidiaries was in excess of any minimum threshold at which
corrective action would be required. At December 31, 2008
and 2007, the Companys consolidated statutory surplus was
$322.8 million and $188.4 million, respectively. The
December 31, 2008 statutory surplus includes the insurance
company subsidiaries acquired in the ProCentury merger.
Currently, the Companys financial strength rating from
A.M. Best is A− (Excellent) for its
Insurance Company Subsidiaries. A.M. Best ratings are
designed to assess an insurers financial strength and
ability to meet continuing obligations to policyholders.
114
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
11.
|
Deferred
Policy Acquisition Costs
|
The following table reflects the amounts of policy acquisition
costs deferred and amortized (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
26,926
|
|
|
$
|
27,902
|
|
|
$
|
26,371
|
|
Additional deferred policy acquisition costs at August 1,
2008(1)
|
|
|
27,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition costs deferred
|
|
|
54,652
|
|
|
|
37,395
|
|
|
|
39,201
|
|
Amortized to expense during the period
|
|
|
(52,560
|
)
|
|
|
(38,371
|
)
|
|
|
(37,670
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
56,454
|
|
|
$
|
26,926
|
|
|
$
|
27,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs activity for 2008 includes
that related to ProCentury of $27.4 million added at
August 1, 2008. |
The Company reduces deferred policy acquisition costs for
premium deficiencies. There were no premium deficiencies at
December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006.
The provision for income taxes consists of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Current tax expense
|
|
$
|
13,925
|
|
|
$
|
13,264
|
|
|
$
|
8,858
|
|
Deferred tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
2,742
|
|
|
|
(1,538
|
)
|
|
|
741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for income tax expense
|
|
$
|
16,667
|
|
|
$
|
11,726
|
|
|
$
|
9,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of the Companys tax provision on income
from operations to the U.S. federal income tax rate of 35%
is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Tax provision at statutory rate
|
|
$
|
15,338
|
|
|
$
|
13,760
|
|
|
$
|
11,027
|
|
Tax effect of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax exempt interest
|
|
|
(3,840
|
)
|
|
|
(2,832
|
)
|
|
|
(2,021
|
)
|
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance
|
|
|
4,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State income taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
610
|
|
|
|
352
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal and state income tax expense
|
|
$
|
16,667
|
|
|
$
|
11,726
|
|
|
$
|
9,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax expense rate
|
|
|
38.0
|
%
|
|
|
29.8
|
%
|
|
|
30.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The current federal statutory tax rate of 35% is based upon
$43.2 million, $38.4 million, and $31.0 million
of taxable income for 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively. At
December 31, 2008 and 2007, the current taxes receivable
were $2.7 million and $760,000, respectively.
115
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Deferred federal income taxes, under SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes, reflect the
estimated future tax effect of temporary differences between the
bases of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes
and such amounts as measured by tax laws and regulations.
The components of deferred tax assets and liabilities as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
$
|
25,705
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,487
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Unearned premium reserves
|
|
|
17,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss / gains on investments
|
|
|
1,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,884
|
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,759
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,424
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
1,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
959
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
Long term incentive plan
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,426
|
|
|
|
789
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other than temporary impairment losses on investments
|
|
|
16,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred gain on sale-leaseback transaction
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred taxes
|
|
|
63,092
|
|
|
|
31,709
|
|
|
|
28,744
|
|
|
|
13,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets before valuation allowance
|
|
|
31,383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(8,665
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
22,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008, the Company had a net deferred tax
asset of $22.7 million. Realization of the deferred tax
asset is dependent upon generating sufficient taxable income to
absorb the applicable reversing temporary differences. A
valuation allowance is established if, based upon certain facts
and/or
circumstances, management believes some or all of certain tax
assets will not be realized. At December 31, 2008, the
Company established a valuation allowance of $8.7 million
related to unrealized losses on equity securities and other than
temporary impairments that, upon realization, could not be
offset by past or future capital gains, of which
$4.0 million was recorded as an adjustment to goodwill and
the remainder was recorded through the statement of operations.
The Company did not record a valuation allowance at
December 31, 2007. Management periodically evaluates the
adequacy of related valuation allowances, taking into account
open tax positions, tax assessments received and tax law
changes. This evaluation involves the use of estimates and a
high degree of management judgment. Actual results could differ
significantly from the estimates and interpretations used in
determining the current and deferred income tax liabilities and
reserves.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN 48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting
and reporting for uncertain tax positions. This interpretation
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for
the financial statement recognition, measurement, and
presentation of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be
taken in an income tax return. The Company adopted the
provisions of FIN 48 as of January 1, 2007.
116
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
As a result of the adoption of FIN 48, the Company
identified, evaluated and measured the amount of income tax
benefits to be recognized for all income tax positions. The net
tax assets recognized under FIN 48 did not differ from the
net tax assets recognized prior to adoption, and, therefore, the
Company did not record an adjustment. As of December 31,
2008 and 2007, the Company did not have any unrecognized tax
benefits.
Interest costs and penalties related to income taxes are
classified as interest expense and other administrative
expenses, respectively. As of December 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, the Company had no accrued interest or
penalties related to uncertain tax positions.
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to
U.S. federal income tax as well as to income tax of
multiple state jurisdictions. Tax returns for all years after
2004 are subject to future examination by tax authorities.
13. Stock
Options, Long Term Incentive Plan, and Deferred Compensation
Plan
Stock
Options
The Company has two plans under which it has issued stock
options, its 1995 and 2002 Amended and Restated Stock Option
Plans (the Plans). Currently the Plans options
have either five or ten-year terms and are exercisable and vest
in equal increments over the option term. Since 2003, the
Company has not issued any new stock options to employees.
The following is a summary of the Companys stock option
activity and related information for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Outstanding beginning of year
|
|
|
132,052
|
|
|
$
|
14.51
|
|
|
|
391,678
|
|
|
$
|
7.38
|
|
|
|
1,605,901
|
|
|
$
|
5.42
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(31,745
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.17
|
|
|
|
(244,574
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.65
|
|
|
|
(791,038
|
)
|
|
$
|
3.32
|
|
Expired and/or forfeited
|
|
|
(35,557
|
)
|
|
$
|
22.75
|
|
|
|
(15,052
|
)
|
|
$
|
21.68
|
|
|
|
(423,185
|
)
|
|
$
|
7.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding end of year
|
|
|
64,750
|
|
|
$
|
16.03
|
|
|
|
132,052
|
|
|
$
|
14.51
|
|
|
|
391,678
|
|
|
$
|
7.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at end of year
|
|
|
64,750
|
|
|
$
|
16.03
|
|
|
|
106,182
|
|
|
$
|
14.51
|
|
|
|
324,704
|
|
|
$
|
7.62
|
|
The following table summarizes information about stock options
outstanding at December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
Range of
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Exercise Prices
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Life (Years)
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
$6.48
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
6.48
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
$
|
6.48
|
|
$10.91 to $24.6875
|
|
|
63,250
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
$
|
16.26
|
|
|
|
63,250
|
|
|
$
|
16.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,750
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
16.03
|
|
|
|
64,750
|
|
|
$
|
16.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long
Term Incentive Plan
The Company maintains a Long Term Incentive Plan (the
LTIP). The LTIP provides participants with the
opportunity to earn cash and stock awards based upon the
achievement of specified financial goals over a three-year
performance period. At the end of a three-year performance
period, and if the performance targets for that period are
achieved, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
shall determine the amount of LTIP awards that are payable to
participants in the LTIP for the current performance period. One-
117
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
half of any LTIP award will be payable in cash and one-half of
the award will be payable in the form of a stock award. If the
Company achieves the performance targets for the three-year
performance period, payment of the cash portion of the award
would be made in three annual installments, with the first
payment being paid as of the end of the that performance period
and the remaining two payments to be paid in the subsequent two
years. Any unpaid portion of a cash award is subject to
forfeiture if the participant voluntarily leaves the Company or
is discharged for cause. The portion of the award to be paid in
the form of stock will be issued as of the end of that
performance period. The number of shares of Companys
common stock subject to the stock award shall equal the dollar
amount of one-half of the LTIP award divided by the market value
of Companys common stock on the first date of the
beginning of the performance period. The stock awards shall be
made subject to the terms and conditions of the LTIP and Plans.
The Company accrues awards based upon the criteria set-forth and
approved by the Compensation Committee, as included in the LTIP.
With the ProCentury merger the Companys Compensation
Committee and its Board of Directors determined that the
Companys need for successfully integrating ProCentury
associates into its LTIP would be heightened and shareholder
value increased, if all participants were in the same plan
beginning in 2009. As a result, its Compensation Committee
approved the termination of Companys current
2007-2009
LTIP effective December 31, 2008 and established a new plan
for
2009-2011
based on new performance targets. Based on this amendment, the
current LTIP participants would receive their award based on a
two-year performance period, rather than a three-year period.
Therefore, the total award would be approximately two-thirds of
the original three-year award. There were no accounting
adjustments as a result of the amendment as there were no
changes to the underlying plan, only an adjustment to the
performance period.
At December 31, 2008, the Company had $1.6 million and
$1.6 million accrued for the cash and stock award,
respectively, for all plan years under the LTIP. The stock
portion for the
2007-2008
plan years was fully expensed as of December 31, 2008. At
December 31, 2007, the Company had $1.6 million and
$772,000 accrued for the cash and stock award, respectively, for
all plan years under the LTIP. Shares related to the
Companys LTIP included in diluted earnings per share were
184,697 and 78,270 for the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively.
Deferred
Compensation Plan
The Company maintains an Executive Nonqualified Excess Plan (the
Excess Plan). The Excess Plan is intended to be a
nonqualified deferred compensation plan that will comply with
the provisions of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue
Code. The Company maintains the Excess Plan to provide a means
by which certain key management employees may elect to defer
receipt of current compensation from the Company in order to
provide retirement and other benefits, as provided for in the
Excess Plan. The Excess Plan is funded solely by the
participating employees and maintained primarily for the purpose
of providing deferred compensation benefits for eligible
employees. At December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
the Company had $690,000 and $644,000 accrued for the Excess
Plan, respectively.
At December 31, 2008, shareholders equity was
$438.2 million, or a book value of $7.64 per common share,
compared to $301.9 million, or a book value of $8.16 per
common share, at December 31, 2007. In conjunction with the
share consideration portion of the purchase price, as described
in Note 2 ~ ProCentury Merger, the Company
issued 21.1 million shares, or $122.7 million of new
equity.
At the Companys regularly scheduled board meeting on
July 25, 2008, the Companys Board of Directors
authorized management to purchase up to 3,000,000 shares of
the Companys common stock in market transactions for a
period not to exceed twenty-four months. This share repurchase
plan replaced the existing share repurchase plan authorized in
October 2007. For the year ended December 31, 2008, the
Company
118
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
purchased and retired 800,000 shares of common stock for a
total cost of approximately $4.9 million. The Company did
not repurchase any common stock during 2007.
The Company paid dividends to its common shareholders of
$3.8 million in 2008. The Company did not pay dividends to
common shareholders in 2007 or 2006. On February 13, 2009,
the Companys Board of Directors declared a quarterly
dividend of $0.02 per common share. The dividend is payable on
March 30, 2009, to shareholders of record as of
March 13, 2009.
When evaluating the declaration of a dividend, the
Companys Board of Directors considers a variety of
factors, including but not limited to, cash flow, liquidity
needs, results of operations, industry conditions, and its
overall financial condition. As a holding company, the
Companys ability to pay cash dividends to its shareholders
is partially dependent on dividends and other permitted payments
from its Insurance Company Subsidiaries.
Basic earnings per share are based on the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during the year, while
diluted earnings per share includes the weighted average number
of common shares and potential dilution from shares issuable
pursuant to stock options or stock awards using the treasury
stock method.
The following table is a reconciliation of the income and share
data used in the basic and diluted earnings per share
computations for the years ended December 31 (in thousands,
except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net income, as reported
|
|
$
|
27,397
|
|
|
$
|
27,992
|
|
|
$
|
22,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
44,810,944
|
|
|
|
33,007,200
|
|
|
|
28,963,228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
44,810,944
|
|
|
|
33,007,200
|
|
|
|
28,963,228
|
|
Dilutive effect of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
16,495
|
|
|
|
126,660
|
|
Share awards under long term incentive plan
|
|
|
184,697
|
|
|
|
78,270
|
|
|
|
476,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
44,995,712
|
|
|
|
33,101,965
|
|
|
|
29,566,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.61
|
|
|
$
|
0.85
|
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
16.
|
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
|
Goodwill
The Company evaluates existing goodwill for impairment on an
annual basis as of October 1st, or more frequently if
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might
be impaired. Goodwill impairment is performed at the reporting
unit level. The fair value of each reporting unit is determined
based upon a current market valuation approach compared to the
carrying value. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value
then possible goodwill impairment may exist and further
evaluation is required.
119
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
During the Companys 2008 annual review of goodwill
impairment, recent acquisitions of ProCentury and USSU were
incorporated into the review of reporting units within each
segment. In accordance with SFAS 142, the Company concluded
its reporting units to be agency operations and specialty
insurance operations. The nature of the business and economic
characteristics of all agency operations and all specialty
insurance operations are similar based upon, but not limited to,
the following; (1) management alignment within each
reporting unit, (2) the Companys Insurance Company
Subsidiaries operate under a reinsurance pooling arrangement,
and (3) the ability of the Company to leverage its
expertise and fixed costs within each reporting unit.
Based on this review, the Company concluded that a certain
business formerly within the agency operations reporting unit,
should now be a component within the specialty insurance
operations reporting unit. While this business has some
intersegment revenue, the majority of the business is included
in specialty insurance operations and the economic
characteristics are similar to the other components within that
reporting unit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency Operations
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
6,469
|
|
|
$
|
37,028
|
|
|
$
|
43,497
|
|
Transfer between reporting units
|
|
|
(3,024
|
)
|
|
|
3,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to goodwill USSU acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,041
|
|
|
|
16,041
|
|
Additions to goodwill ProCentury merger
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,490
|
|
|
|
59,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
3,445
|
|
|
$
|
115,583
|
|
|
$
|
119,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, the Company performed an additional impairment
analysis of goodwill as of December 31, 2008 due to a
decline in the Companys market capitalization and further
economic conditions. As a result of these tests, no impairment
of goodwill was recorded for 2008. The Company did not record
any impairment losses in relation to its existing goodwill
during 2007 or 2006.
Goodwill
related to ProCentury Merger
Following the close of business on July 31, 2008, the
Companys Merger with ProCentury was completed. The Merger
was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting, which
resulted in initial goodwill of $48.8 million equaling the
excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable
assets.
As of December 31, 2008, the Company recorded an additional
increase to goodwill of $10.7 million. This increase was
primarily related to a $9.1 million adjustment to record a
deferred tax liability related to the other intangible assets
related to the agent relationships and the trade name, which are
described below. The remaining increase to goodwill was
primarily related to adjustments recorded to reflect updated
information on certain accruals and related expenses as more
refined information became available during the Companys
fourth quarter review.
Refer to Note 2 ProCentury Merger for
further detail and pro forma information relating to the
Companys Merger with ProCentury.
Goodwill
related to USSU Acquisition
Effective January 31, 2008, the Company exercised its
option to purchase the remainder of the economics related to the
acquisition of the USSU business in April 2007, by terminating
the Management Agreement for a payment of $20.9 million. As
a result, the Company recorded an increase to other intangible
assets of approximately $4.9 million and an increase to
goodwill of approximately $16.0 million.
120
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Other
Intangible Assets
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had other
intangible assets, net of related accumulated amortization, of
$47.0 million and $17.1 million, respectively,
recorded on the consolidated balance sheet as part of
Other Assets.
As described above, the Company completed its Merger with
ProCentury following the close of business on July 31,
2008. Following the Merger, the Company obtained third-party
valuations of other intangible assets, which were reflected
within the purchase price allocation. As a result of the
valuation analysis, the Company recorded a $21.0 million
and $5.0 million increase to other intangible assets
related to agent relationships and trade names. The other
intangible asset related to the agent relationships is being
amortized based on the life of cash flows over an estimated
useful life of fifteen years. The other intangible asset related
to the trade names is being amortized over an estimated useful
life of ten years. In addition and based on the valuation
analysis, the Company also recorded an increase of $5.0 related
to insurance licenses, which were determined to have an
indefinite life and are not subject to amortization.
In addition, and as described above, the Company also recorded a
$4.9 million increase to other intangible assets related to
the USSU acquisition. As of December 31, 2008, the gross
carrying amount of other intangible assets related to the USSU
acquisition was $14.5 million and is being amortized over
an estimated useful life of eight years.
All other intangible assets, except those described above, are
being amortized over an estimated useful life period of between
five to ten years. The Company has an additional other
intangible asset which has an indefinite life and is evaluated
annually in accordance with SFAS No. 142.
At December 31, 2008, the gross carrying amount of other
intangible assets was $56.7 million and the accumulated
amortization was $9.8 million. At December 31, 2007,
the gross carrying amount of other intangible assets was
$20.5 million and the accumulated amortization was
$3.4 million. Amortization expense related to other
intangible assets for 2008, 2007, and 2006, was
$6.3 million, $1.9 million, and $590,000, respectively.
Amortization expense for the five succeeding years is as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
5,737
|
|
2010
|
|
|
4,907
|
|
2011
|
|
|
4,632
|
|
2012
|
|
|
4,692
|
|
2013
|
|
|
3,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortization expense
|
|
$
|
23,954
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.
|
U.S.
Specialty Underwriters, Inc. Acquisition
|
In April 2007, the Company acquired the business of
U.S. Specialty Underwriters, Inc. (USSU) for a
purchase price of $23.0 million. Goodwill associated with
this acquisition was approximately $12.0 million. In
addition, the Company recorded an increase to other intangible
assets of approximately $9.5 million. These other
intangible assets related to customer relationships acquired
with the acquisition.
In addition, the Company had entered into a Management Agreement
with the former owners of USSU. Under the terms of the
Management Agreement, the former owners were responsible for
certain aspects of the daily administration and management of
the USSU business. Their consideration for the performance of
these duties was in the form of a management fee payable by the
Company based on a share of net income before interest, taxes,
depreciation, and amortization. The Company retained the option
to terminate the Management
121
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Agreement, at its discretion, based on a multiple of the
management fee calculated for the trailing twelve months.
Effective January 31, 2008, the Company exercised its
option to purchase the remainder of the economics related to the
acquisition of the USSU business, by terminating the Management
Agreement with the former owners for a payment of
$20.9 million. As a result of this purchase, the Company
recorded an increase to other intangible assets of approximately
$4.9 million and an increase to goodwill of approximately
$16.0 million.
|
|
18.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
The Company has certain operating lease agreements for its
offices and equipment. A majority of the Companys lease
agreements contain renewal options and rent escalation clauses.
At December 31, 2008, future minimum rental payments
required under non-cancelable long-term operating leases are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
4,031
|
|
2010
|
|
|
3,825
|
|
2011
|
|
|
3,462
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2,790
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2,323
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease commitments
|
|
$
|
16,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007,
and 2006 was $3.3 million, $2.7 million, and
$2.4 million, respectively.
Most states require admitted property and casualty insurers to
become members of insolvency funds or associations, which
generally protect policyholders against the insolvency of such
insurers. Members of the fund or association must contribute to
the payment of certain claims made against insolvent insurers.
Maximum contributions required by law in any one year vary
between 1% and 2% of annual premium written by a member in that
state. Assessments from insolvency funds were $196,000,
$156,000, and $306,000, for 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.
Most of these payments are recoverable through future policy
surcharges and premium tax reductions.
The Companys Insurance Company Subsidiaries are also
required to participate in various mandatory insurance
facilities or in funding mandatory pools, which are generally
designed to provide insurance coverage for consumers who are
unable to obtain insurance in the voluntary insurance market.
Among the pools participated in are those established in certain
states to provide windstorm and other similar types of property
coverage. These pools typically require all companies writing
applicable lines of insurance in the state for which the pool
has been established to fund deficiencies experienced by the
pool based upon each companys relative premium writings in
that state, with any excess funding typically distributed to the
participating companies on the same basis. To the extent that
reinsurance treaties do not cover these assessments, they may
have an adverse effect on the Company. Total assessments paid to
all such facilities were $2.4 million, $2.6 million,
and $3.1 million, for 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.
The Company, and its subsidiaries, are subject at times to
various claims, lawsuits and proceedings relating principally to
alleged errors or omissions in the placement of insurance,
claims administration, consulting services and other business
transactions arising in the ordinary course of business. Where
appropriate, the Company vigorously defends such claims,
lawsuits and proceedings. Some of these claims, lawsuits and
proceedings seek damages, including consequential, exemplary or
punitive damages, in amounts that could, if awarded, be
significant. Most of the claims, lawsuits and proceedings
arising in the ordinary
122
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
course of business are covered by errors and omissions insurance
or other appropriate insurance. In terms of deductibles
associated with such insurance, the Company has established
provisions against these items, which are believed to be
adequate in light of current information and legal advice. In
accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies, if it is probable that an asset has
been impaired or a liability has been incurred as of the date of
the financial statements and the amount of loss is estimable; an
accrual for the costs to resolve these claims is recorded by the
Company in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Period
expenses related to the defense of such claims are included in
other operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated
statements of income. Management, with the assistance of outside
counsel, adjusts such provisions according to new developments
or changes in the strategy in dealing with such matters. On the
basis of current information, the Company does not expect the
outcome of the claims, lawsuits and proceedings to which the
Company is subject to, either individually, or in the aggregate,
will have a material adverse effect on the Companys
financial condition. However, it is possible that future results
of operations or cash flows for any particular quarter or annual
period could be materially affected by an unfavorable resolution
of any such matters.
|
|
19.
|
Sale-Leaseback
Transaction
|
In 2004, the Company entered into an agreement with an
unaffiliated third party to sell its property in Cerritos,
California, owned by Savers and subsequently leaseback the
property to Meadowbrook, Inc. There were no future commitments,
obligations, provisions, or circumstances included in either the
sale contract or the lease contract that would result in the
Companys continuing involvement; therefore, the assets
associated with the property were removed from the
Companys consolidated balance sheets.
The sale proceeds were $2.9 million and the net book value
of the property was $1.9 million. Direct costs associated
with the transaction were $158,000. In conjunction with the
sale, a deferred gain of $880,000 was recorded and is being
amortized over the ten-year term of the operating lease. At
December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had a deferred gain
of $484,000 and $572,000, respectively, on the consolidated
balance sheet in Other Liabilities. Total
amortization of the gain was $88,000 a year for 2008 and 2007,
for a total accumulated amortization of $396,000 as of
December 31, 2008.
|
|
20.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company held an $852,000
and $870,000 note receivable from one of its executive officers,
including $191,000 and $209,000 of accrued interest,
respectively. This note arose from a transaction in late 1998 in
which the Company loaned the officer funds to exercise 64,718
common stock options to cover the exercise price and the taxes
incurred as a result of the exercise. The note bears interest
equal to the rate charged pursuant to the Companys
revolving credit agreement and is due on demand any time after
January 1, 2002. As of December 31, 2008, the rate was
3.42%. The loan is partially collateralized by
64,718 shares of the Companys common stock under a
stock pledge agreement. For the years ended December 31,
2008 and 2007, $43,800 and $43,800, respectively, have been paid
against the loan. As of December 31, 2008, the cumulative
amount that has been paid against this loan was $206,600.
The Company maintains an employment agreement with the executive
officer, which provides the note is a non-recourse loan and the
Companys sole legal remedy in the event of a default is
the right to reclaim the shares pledged under the stock pledge
agreement. Also, if there is a change in control of the Company
and the officer is terminated or if the officer is terminated
without cause, the note is cancelled and deemed paid in full. In
these events, the officer may also retain the pledged shares of
the Company, or, at the officers discretion, sell these
shares back to the Company at the then current market price or
their book value, whichever is greater.
123
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
If the officer is terminated by the Company for cause, the note
is cancelled and considered paid in full. In this case, however,
the officer forfeits the pledged shares of the Company, or, at
the Companys discretion, must sell these shares back to
the Company for a nominal amount.
If the officer terminates his employment during the term of the
agreement, the Company could demand full repayment of the note.
If the note was not paid by the officer on the demand of the
Company, the Companys only recourse is to reclaim the
shares of the Company that were pledged under the stock pledge
agreement.
|
|
21.
|
Employee
Benefit Plans
|
Company employees over the age of
201/2
who have completed six months of service are eligible for
participation in The Meadowbrook, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing
Plan (the 401(k) Plan). The 401(k) Plan provides for
matching contributions
and/or
profit sharing contributions at the discretion of the Board of
Directors of Meadowbrook, Inc. In 2008, 2007, and 2006, the
matching contributions were $1.1 million, $928,000, and
$852,000, respectively. There were no profit sharing
contributions in 2008, 2007, and 2006.
124
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
22.
|
Quarterly
Financial Data (Unaudited)
|
The following is a summary of unaudited quarterly results of
operations for 2008 and 2007 (in thousands, except per share and
ratio data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st
|
|
|
2nd
|
|
|
3rd
|
|
|
4th
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written
|
|
$
|
90,468
|
|
|
$
|
94,370
|
|
|
$
|
134,418
|
|
|
$
|
138,427
|
|
Net premiums written
|
|
|
71,399
|
|
|
|
76,071
|
|
|
|
112,465
|
|
|
|
115,259
|
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
|
66,022
|
|
|
|
77,031
|
|
|
|
104,243
|
|
|
|
122,425
|
|
Net commissions and fees
|
|
|
12,031
|
|
|
|
9,632
|
|
|
|
12,309
|
|
|
|
8,932
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
7,148
|
|
|
|
6,917
|
|
|
|
10,622
|
|
|
|
11,937
|
|
Net realized losses
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
(7,290
|
)
|
|
|
(3,955
|
)
|
Net losses and LAE incurred
|
|
|
37,661
|
|
|
|
43,542
|
|
|
|
63,932
|
|
|
|
67,750
|
|
Policy acquisition and other underwriting expenses
|
|
|
13,147
|
|
|
|
12,716
|
|
|
|
19,470
|
|
|
|
23,961
|
|
Other administrative expenses
|
|
|
8,832
|
|
|
|
7,961
|
|
|
|
8,055
|
|
|
|
10,153
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
|
12,755
|
|
|
|
14,143
|
|
|
|
17,056
|
|
|
|
18,908
|
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
1,551
|
|
|
|
1,563
|
|
|
|
1,531
|
|
|
|
1,665
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
|
|
1,254
|
|
|
|
2,333
|
|
|
|
2,783
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
7,058
|
|
|
|
8,437
|
|
|
|
4,195
|
|
|
|
7,706
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
GAAP combined ratio(1)
|
|
|
93.9
|
%
|
|
|
90.5
|
%
|
|
|
96.7
|
%
|
|
|
91.8
|
%
|
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written
|
|
$
|
89,504
|
|
|
$
|
78,000
|
|
|
$
|
90,729
|
|
|
$
|
88,218
|
|
Net premiums written
|
|
|
71,972
|
|
|
|
65,670
|
|
|
|
73,203
|
|
|
|
69,366
|
|
Net premiums earned
|
|
|
65,204
|
|
|
|
67,191
|
|
|
|
67,337
|
|
|
|
68,465
|
|
Net commissions and fees
|
|
|
11,551
|
|
|
|
10,743
|
|
|
|
13,319
|
|
|
|
10,375
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
6,156
|
|
|
|
6,229
|
|
|
|
6,788
|
|
|
|
7,227
|
|
Net realized (losses) gains
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
|
|
36
|
|
Net losses and LAE incurred
|
|
|
36,646
|
|
|
|
39,707
|
|
|
|
37,015
|
|
|
|
37,601
|
|
Policy acquisition and other underwriting expenses
|
|
|
13,643
|
|
|
|
13,169
|
|
|
|
12,927
|
|
|
|
13,978
|
|
Other administrative expenses
|
|
|
7,393
|
|
|
|
7,598
|
|
|
|
8,890
|
|
|
|
8,087
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
|
13,532
|
|
|
|
12,900
|
|
|
|
15,750
|
|
|
|
14,251
|
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
622
|
|
|
|
621
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
1,488
|
|
|
|
1,667
|
|
|
|
1,476
|
|
|
|
1,400
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
6,923
|
|
|
|
6,186
|
|
|
|
7,555
|
|
|
|
7,328
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
GAAP combined ratio(1)
|
|
|
96.3
|
%
|
|
|
97.4
|
%
|
|
|
93.8
|
%
|
|
|
94.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Management uses the GAAP combined ratio and its components to
assess and benchmark underwriting performance. The GAAP combined
ratio is the sum of the GAAP loss and loss adjustment expense
ratio and the GAAP expense ratio. The GAAP loss and loss
adjustment expense ratio is the unconsolidated net incurred loss
and loss adjustment expense in relation to net earned premium.
The GAAP expense ratio is the unconsolidated policy acquisition
and other underwriting expenses in relation to net earned
premium. |
125
Schedule I
Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc.
Summary of investments-other than investments in related
parties
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Which
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shown in the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
Type of Investment
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Sheet
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Fixed Maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US government and government agencies and authorities
|
|
$
|
51,248
|
|
|
$
|
56,263
|
|
|
$
|
56,263
|
|
States and political subdivisions
|
|
|
475,369
|
|
|
|
479,922
|
|
|
|
479,922
|
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
146,605
|
|
|
|
143,496
|
|
|
|
143,496
|
|
Mortgage and asset-backed securities
|
|
|
304,391
|
|
|
|
306,802
|
|
|
|
306,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fixed Maturities
|
|
$
|
977,613
|
|
|
$
|
986,483
|
|
|
$
|
986,483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
12,945
|
|
|
|
10,479
|
|
|
|
10,479
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
14,715
|
|
|
|
12,098
|
|
|
|
12,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Equity Securities
|
|
|
27,660
|
|
|
|
22,577
|
|
|
|
22,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments
|
|
$
|
1,005,273
|
|
|
$
|
1,009,060
|
|
|
$
|
1,009,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126
SCHEDULE II
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
PARENT COMPANY ONLY
BALANCE SHEET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Investments
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
32,643
|
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
|
|
501,533
|
|
|
|
317,544
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
492
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
62,514
|
|
|
|
3,024
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
40,277
|
|
|
|
27,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
604,551
|
|
|
$
|
381,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
Other liabilities
|
|
$
|
3,747
|
|
|
$
|
2,231
|
|
Payable to subsidiaries
|
|
|
46,454
|
|
|
|
21,459
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
60,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debentures
|
|
|
55,930
|
|
|
|
55,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
166,381
|
|
|
|
79,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
314,641
|
|
|
|
194,621
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
127,157
|
|
|
|
104,274
|
|
Note receivable from officer
|
|
|
(852
|
)
|
|
|
(870
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) gain
|
|
|
(3,349
|
)
|
|
|
3,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
438,170
|
|
|
|
301,894
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
604,551
|
|
|
$
|
381,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127
SCHEDULE II
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
PARENT COMPANY ONLY
INCOME STATEMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
2,636
|
|
|
$
|
3,318
|
|
|
$
|
2,690
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
7,298
|
|
|
|
6,558
|
|
|
|
6,375
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
5,386
|
|
|
|
4,332
|
|
|
|
3,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
12,684
|
|
|
|
10,890
|
|
|
|
10,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes and subsidiary equity
|
|
|
(10,048
|
)
|
|
|
(7,572
|
)
|
|
|
(7,654
|
)
|
Federal and state income tax benefit
|
|
|
(3,561
|
)
|
|
|
(2,878
|
)
|
|
|
(2,878
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before subsidiary equity earnings
|
|
|
(6,487
|
)
|
|
|
(4,694
|
)
|
|
|
(4,776
|
)
|
Subsidiary equity earnings
|
|
|
33,884
|
|
|
|
32,686
|
|
|
|
26,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
27,397
|
|
|
$
|
27,992
|
|
|
$
|
22,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
SCHEDULE II
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
PARENT COMPANY ONLY
STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
27,397
|
|
|
$
|
27,992
|
|
|
$
|
22,034
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities:
|
|
|
(12,960
|
)
|
|
|
4,810
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
Net deferred derivative (loss) gain hedging activity
|
|
|
(5,457
|
)
|
|
|
(484
|
)
|
|
|
121
|
|
Less: reclassification adjustment for gains included in net
income
|
|
|
11,569
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(6,848
|
)
|
|
|
4,336
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
20,549
|
|
|
$
|
32,328
|
|
|
$
|
22,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129
SCHEDULE II
CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF REGISTRANT
MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
PARENT COMPANY ONLY
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
$
|
4,278
|
|
|
$
|
1,320
|
|
|
$
|
(1,488
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow from Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net purchase of investments
|
|
|
(32,979
|
)
|
|
|
(32,643
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from subsidiaries
|
|
|
18,862
|
|
|
|
1,729
|
|
|
|
4,629
|
|
Investment in subsidiaries
|
|
|
(42,004
|
)
|
|
|
(19,350
|
)
|
|
|
(4,600
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(56,121
|
)
|
|
|
(50,264
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from borrowings
|
|
|
73,000
|
|
|
|
19,025
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
Principal payments on borrowings
|
|
|
(12,750
|
)
|
|
|
(26,025
|
)
|
|
|
(10,500
|
)
|
Net proceeds from issuance of debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(374
|
)
|
|
|
(538
|
)
|
Dividends paid on common stock
|
|
|
(3,797
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
(4,942
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payroll taxes associated with long-term incentive plan stock
issuance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,841
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from public equity offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financing activities
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
51,533
|
|
|
|
49,371
|
|
|
|
1,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(310
|
)
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
|
|
$
|
182
|
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Disclosure for Non-cash Investing and Financing
Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock portion of purchase price for acquisition of
U.S. Specialty Underwriters, Inc.
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Common stock portion of purchase price for merger with
ProCentury Corporation
|
|
$
|
122,725
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
130
Schedule III
Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc.
Supplementary Insurance Information
December 31, 2008
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Losses,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy
|
|
|
Claims &
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Premium
|
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Premium
|
|
|
Payable
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Specialty Risk Management Operations
|
|
$
|
56,454
|
|
|
$
|
885,697
|
|
|
$
|
282,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
369,721
|
|
Agency Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
56,454
|
|
|
$
|
885,697
|
|
|
$
|
282,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
369,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits,
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims,
|
|
|
of Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Losses &
|
|
|
Policy
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Settlement
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Premium
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Written
|
|
|
Specialty Risk Management Operations
|
|
$
|
35,888
|
|
|
$
|
212,885
|
|
|
$
|
52,560
|
|
|
$
|
100,689
|
|
|
$
|
375,194
|
|
Agency Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
736
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,624
|
|
|
$
|
212,885
|
|
|
$
|
52,560
|
|
|
$
|
128,587
|
|
|
$
|
375,194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
Schedule III
Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc.
Supplementary Insurance Information
December 31, 2007
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Losses,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy
|
|
|
Claims &
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Premium
|
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Premium
|
|
|
Payable
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Specialty Risk Management Operations
|
|
$
|
26,926
|
|
|
$
|
540,002
|
|
|
$
|
153,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
268,197
|
|
Agency Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
26,926
|
|
|
$
|
540,002
|
|
|
$
|
153,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
268,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits,
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims,
|
|
|
of Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Losses &
|
|
|
Policy
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Settlement
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Premium
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Written
|
|
|
Specialty Risk Management Operations
|
|
$
|
25,487
|
|
|
$
|
150,969
|
|
|
$
|
38,371
|
|
|
$
|
92,664
|
|
|
$
|
280,211
|
|
Agency Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
26,400
|
|
|
$
|
150,969
|
|
|
$
|
38,371
|
|
|
$
|
112,008
|
|
|
$
|
280,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132
Schedule III
Meadowbrook
Insurance Group, Inc.
Supplementary
Insurance Information
December 31, 2006
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Losses,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy
|
|
|
Claims &
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Premium
|
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Premium
|
|
|
Payable
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Speciality Risk Management Operations
|
|
$
|
27,902
|
|
|
$
|
501,077
|
|
|
$
|
144,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
254,920
|
|
Agency Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
27,902
|
|
|
$
|
501,077
|
|
|
$
|
144,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
254,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits,
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims,
|
|
|
of Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Losses &
|
|
|
Policy
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Settlement
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Premium
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Written
|
|
|
Speciality Risk Management Operations
|
|
$
|
21,115
|
|
|
$
|
146,293
|
|
|
$
|
37,670
|
|
|
$
|
84,632
|
|
|
$
|
262,668
|
|
Agency Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,075
|
|
|
$
|
146,293
|
|
|
$
|
37,670
|
|
|
$
|
102,768
|
|
|
$
|
262,668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133
Schedule IV
Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc.
Reinsurance
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceded
|
|
|
Assumed
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Amount
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
to Other
|
|
|
from Other
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Assumed to
|
|
Property and Liability Insurance
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Companies
|
|
|
Companies
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
441,709
|
|
|
$
|
86,061
|
|
|
$
|
14,073
|
|
|
$
|
369,721
|
|
|
|
3.81
|
%
|
2007
|
|
$
|
266,049
|
|
|
$
|
68,902
|
|
|
$
|
71,050
|
|
|
$
|
268,197
|
|
|
|
26.49
|
%
|
2006
|
|
$
|
251,288
|
|
|
$
|
72,367
|
|
|
$
|
75,999
|
|
|
$
|
254,920
|
|
|
|
29.81
|
%
|
134
Schedule VI
Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc.
Supplemental Information Concerning Property and Casualty
Insurance Operations
For the Years Ended December 31,
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount, If
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves for
|
|
|
Any,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Losses and
|
|
|
Deducted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
from
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Previous
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Premiums
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
Affiliation with Registrant
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Expenses(2)
|
|
|
Column(1)
|
|
|
Premiums(2)
|
|
|
Earned
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
(a) Consolidated Property and Casualty Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
56,454
|
|
|
$
|
885,697
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
282,086
|
|
|
$
|
369,721
|
|
|
$
|
35,888
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
26,926
|
|
|
$
|
540,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
153,927
|
|
|
$
|
268,197
|
|
|
$
|
25,487
|
|
2006
|
|
$
|
27,902
|
|
|
$
|
501,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
144,575
|
|
|
$
|
254,920
|
|
|
$
|
21,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Deferred
|
|
|
Paid Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and Loss
|
|
|
Policy
|
|
|
and Loss
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Adjustment Expense
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Premiums
|
|
|
|
Current Year
|
|
|
Prior Years
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Written
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
229,657
|
|
|
$
|
(16,772
|
)
|
|
$
|
52,560
|
|
|
$
|
176,834
|
|
|
$
|
375,194
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
158,061
|
|
|
$
|
(7,091
|
)
|
|
$
|
38,371
|
|
|
$
|
112,084
|
|
|
$
|
280,211
|
|
2006
|
|
$
|
149,012
|
|
|
$
|
(2,719
|
)
|
|
$
|
37,670
|
|
|
$
|
115,061
|
|
|
$
|
262,668
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Company does not employ any discounting techniques. |
|
(2) |
|
Reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses are shown gross
of $260.4 million, $198.5 million and
$198.4 million of reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses
in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Unearned premiums are
shown gross of ceded unearned premiums of $31.9 million,
$17.8 million and $20.4 million in 2008, 2007 and
2006, respectively. |
136
MEADOWBROOK
INSURANCE GROUP, INC.
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
Basis
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company
|
|
|
(15)
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company
|
|
|
(16)
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Junior Subordinated Indenture between Meadowbrook Insurance
Group, Inc., and JP Morgan Chase Bank, dated September 30,
2003
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Junior Subordinated Indenture between Meadowbrook Insurance
Group, Inc. and LaSalle Bank National Association, dated as of
September 16, 2005
|
|
|
(11)
|
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Indenture, dated as of December 4, 2002, by and between
ProFinance Holdings Corporation and State Street Bank and
Trust Company of Connecticut
|
|
|
(22)
|
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, dated as of
December 4, 2002, by and among State Street Bank and
Trust Company of Connecticut, ProFinance Holdings
Corporation and Steven R. Young and John Marazza, as
Administrators
|
|
|
(22)
|
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Guarantee Agreement, dated as of December 4, 2002, by and
between ProFinance Holdings Corporation and State Street Bank
and Trust Company of Connecticut
|
|
|
(22)
|
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
Indenture, dated as of May 16, 2003, by and between
ProFinance Holdings Corporation and U.S. Bank National
Association
|
|
|
(22)
|
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust, dated as of
May 16, 2003, by and among U.S. Bank National
Association, ProFinance Holdings Corporation and Steven R. Young
and John Marazza, as Administrators
|
|
|
(22)
|
|
|
4
|
.8
|
|
Guarantee Agreement, dated as of May 16, 2003, by and
between ProFinance Holdings Corporation and U.S. Bank National
Association
|
|
|
(22)
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. Amended and Restated 1995
Stock Option Plan
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Meadowbrook, Inc. 401(k) and Profit Sharing Plan Trust, amended
and restated December 31, 1994
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Demand Note dated November 9, 1998 among the Company and
Robert S. Cubbin and Kathleen D. Cubbin and Stock Pledge
Agreement
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. Amended and Restated 2002
Stock Option Plan
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Agency Agreement by and between Meadowbrook, Inc., Preferred
Insurance Agency, Inc., TPA Insurance Agency, Inc., Preferred
Comp Insurance Agency of New Hampshire, TPA Insurance Agency of
New Hampshire, Inc., Meadowbrook of Nevada, Inc., d/b/a
Meadowbrook Insurance Services, Meadowbrook of Florida, Inc.,
Association Self-Insurance Services, Inc., Commercial Carriers
Insurance Agency, Inc., and Star Insurance Company, Savers
Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Williamsburg National
Insurance Company, and Ameritrust Insurance Corporation, dated
January 1, 2003
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Purchase Agreement among Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc.,
Meadowbrook Capital Trust I, and Dekania CDO I, Ltd.,
dated September 30, 2003
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Amended and Restated Trust Agreement among Meadowbrook
Insurance Group, Inc., JP Morgan Chase Bank, Chase
Manhattan Bank USA, National Association, and
The Administrative Trustees Named Herein, dated
September 30, 2003
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Guaranty Agreement between Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc.,
and JP Morgan Chase Bank, dated September 30, 2003
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. Long Term Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
(8)
|
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
Indenture between Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. and JPMorgan
Chase Bank, as Trustee, dated April 29, 2004
|
|
|
(8)
|
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
Indenture between Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. and
Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee, dated May 26,
2004
|
|
|
(8)
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
Basis
|
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
Land Contract between Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. and MB
Center II LLC, dated July 15, 2004
|
|
|
(8)
|
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
Loan Agreement by and between Ameritrust Insurance Corporation,
Savers Property and Casualty Insurance Company, Star Insurance
Company, Williamsburg National Insurance Company, Meadowbrook
Insurance Group, Inc., and Meadowbrook, Inc., dated
September 1, 2004
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under the
Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc., Stock Option Plan, dated
February 21, 2003
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Lease Agreement between Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. and
Meadowbrook, Inc., dated December 6, 2004
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Master Lease Agreement between LaSalle National Leasing
Corporation and Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc., dated
December 30, 2004
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
Promissory Note between Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. and
Star Insurance Company, dated January 1, 2005
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
Commercial Mortgage between Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc.
and Star Insurance Company, dated January 1, 2005
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Assignment of Leases and Rents between Meadowbrook Insurance
Group, Inc. and Star Insurance Company, dated January 1,
2005
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Amendment to Demand Note Addendum among the Company and Robert
S. Cubbin and Kathleen D. Cubbin, dated February 17, 2005
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Reciprocal Easement and Operation Agreement between Meadowbrook
Insurance Group, Inc. and MB Center II, LLC, dated May 9,
2005
|
|
|
(10)
|
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
First Amendment to Land Contract between MB Center II, LLC and
Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc., dated May 20, 2005
|
|
|
(10)
|
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Purchase Agreement among Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc.,
Meadowbrook Capital Trust II, and Merrill Lynch
International, dated as of September 16, 2005
|
|
|
(11)
|
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Amended and Restated Trust Agreement among Meadowbrook
Insurance Group, Inc., LaSalle Bank National Association,
Christiana Bank & Trust Company, and The
Administrative Trustees Named Herein, dated as of
September 16, 2005
|
|
|
(11)
|
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Guarantee Agreement between Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc.,
and LaSalle Bank National Association, dated as of
September 16, 2005
|
|
|
(11)
|
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
Convertible Note between Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. and
Renaissance Insurance Group, LLC, dated December 20, 2005
|
|
|
(12)
|
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
Executive Nonqualified Excess Plan, Plan Document, effective
May 1, 2006
|
|
|
(13)
|
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
Executive Nonqualified Excess Plan Adoption Agreement, effective
May 1, 2006
|
|
|
(13)
|
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
Executive Nonqualified Excess Plan, Rabbi Trust Agreement,
between Meadowbrook, Inc. and Delaware Charter
Guarantee & Trust Company, conducting business as
Principal Trust Company, dated March 30, 2006
|
|
|
(14)
|
|
|
10
|
.30
|
|
Amendment to Land Contract between Meadowbrook Insurance Group,
Inc. and MB Center II, LLC, dated January 31, 2008
|
|
|
(17)
|
|
|
10
|
.31
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated July 31, 2008, between Meadowbrook
Insurance Group, Inc., as the Borrower, Bank of America, N.A.,
as Administrative Agent and L/C Issuer, KeyBank National
Association, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and RBS Citizens N.A., as
Co-Syndication Agents, the other lenders party hereto, and Banc
of America Securities LLC, as Sole Lead Arranger and Sole Book
Manager
|
|
|
(18)
|
|
|
10
|
.32
|
|
Revolving Credit Note, dated July 31, 2008, between
Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. and RBS Citizens, National
Association, D/B/A Charter One
|
|
|
(18)
|
|
|
10
|
.33
|
|
Term Note, dated July 31, 2008, between Meadowbrook
Insurance Group, Inc. and RBS Citizens, National Association,
D/B/A Charter One
|
|
|
(18)
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Filing
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
|
Basis
|
|
|
10
|
.34
|
|
Revolving Credit Note, dated July 31, 2008, between
Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. and The PrivateBank and
Trust Company
|
|
|
(18)
|
|
|
10
|
.35
|
|
Term Note, dated July 31, 2008, between Meadowbrook
Insurance Group, Inc. and The PrivateBank and Trust Company
|
|
|
(18)
|
|
|
10
|
.36
|
|
Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated
July 31, 2008, by and between ProCentury Corporation and
Christopher J. Timm
|
|
|
(19)
|
|
|
10
|
.37
|
|
Consulting Agreement, dated October 1, 2008, by and among
Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc., Meadowbrook, Inc., and Merton
J. Segal
|
|
|
(20)
|
|
|
10
|
.38
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Company and Robert S. Cubbin,
dated January 1, 2009
|
|
|
(21)
|
|
|
10
|
.39
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Company and Michael G.
Costello, dated January 1, 2009
|
|
|
(21)
|
|
|
10
|
.40
|
|
Form of senior executive Employment Agreement by and between the
Company and Karen M. Spaun, Stephen Belden, Archie McIntyre,
James M. Mahoney, Joseph E. Mattingly, and Robert C. Spring,
dated January 1, 2009
|
|
|
(21)
|
|
|
10
|
.41
|
|
First Amendment to the Companys Long Term Incentive Plan,
dated December 30, 2008
|
|
|
(21)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
Compliance Program / Code of Conduct
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
List of Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
Power of Attorney
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
.1
|
|
Star Insurance Companys 2008 Schedule P
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
28
|
.2
|
|
Savers Property & Casualty Insurance Companys
2008 Schedule P
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
28
|
.3
|
|
Williamsburg National Insurance Companys 2008
Schedule P
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
28
|
.4
|
|
Ameritrust Insurance Corporations 2008 Schedule P
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Robert S. Cubbin, Chief Executive Officer of
the Corporation, pursuant to Securities Exchange Act
Rule 13a-14(a).
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Karen M. Spaun, Chief Financial Officer of the
Corporation, pursuant to Securities Exchange Act
Rule 13a-14(a).
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, signed by Robert S. Cubbin, Chief Executive Officer of
the Corporation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, signed by Karen M. Spaun, Chief Financial Officer of
the Corporation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
.1
|
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of September 30, 1999, by and
between Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. and First Chicago
Trust Company of New York, including the Certificate of
Designation, the form of Rights Certificate and the Summary of
Rights attached thereto as Exhibits A, B and C, respectively
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to
Form S-1
Registration Statement (No.
33-2626206)
of Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc. declared effective
November 20, 1995.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Submitted in paper format under
separate cover; see Form SE filing.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99.1 to the Companys
Form 8-A
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
October 12, 1999.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Filed as Exhibit to
Form 10-K
for the year ending December 31, 1998.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Filed as Exhibit to
Form 10-K
for the year ending December 31, 2002.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Filed as Exhibit to
Form 10-Q
for the period ending September 30, 2003.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Filed as Appendix to Meadowbrook
Insurance Group, Inc. 2004 Proxy Statement.
|
|
(8)
|
|
Filed as Exhibit to
Form 10-Q
for the period ending June 30, 2004.
|
139
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
Filed as Exhibit to
Form 10-K
for the year ending December 31, 2004.
|
|
(10)
|
|
Filed as Exhibit to
Form 10-Q
for the period ending June 30, 2005.
|
|
(11)
|
|
Filed as Exhibit to Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed on September 22, 2005.
|
|
(12)
|
|
Filed as Exhibit to
Form 10-K
for the year ending December 31, 2005.
|
|
(13)
|
|
Filed as Exhibit to Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed on May 31, 2006.
|
|
(14)
|
|
Filed as Exhibit to
Form 10-Q
for the period ending June 30, 2006.
|
|
(15)
|
|
Filed as Exhibit to
Form 10-Q
for the period ending June 30, 2007.
|
|
(16)
|
|
Filed as Exhibit to
Form 10-K
for the year ending December 31, 2007.
|
|
(17)
|
|
Filed as Exhibit to
Form 10-K
for the year ending December 31, 2007.
|
|
(18)
|
|
Filed as Exhibit to Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed on July 31, 2008.
|
|
(19)
|
|
Filed as Exhibit to Current Report
on
Form 8-K
as filed by ProCentury Corporation on July 31, 2008.
|
|
(20)
|
|
Filed as Exhibit to Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed on September 8, 2008.
|
|
(21)
|
|
Filed as Exhibit to Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed on January 7, 2009.
|
|
(22)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to
ProCentury Corporations Registration Statement on
Form S-1,
as amended.
|
140
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in Southfield, Michigan.
MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC
By:
Robert S. Cubbin
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
By:
Karen M. Spaun
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Dated: March 16, 2009
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**
Merton
J. Segal
|
|
Chairman and Director
|
|
March 16, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert
S. Cubbin
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
March 16, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
**
Joseph
S. Dresner
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
**
Hugh
W. Greenberg
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
**
Florine
Mark
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
**
Robert
H. Naftaly
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2009
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**
David
K. Page
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
**
Robert
W. Sturgis
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
**
Bruce
E. Thal
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
**
Herbert
Tyner
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
**
Jeffrey
A. Maffett
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
**
Robert
F. Fix
|
|
Director
|
|
March 16, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
**By:
Robert
S. Cubbin,
Attorney-in-fact
|
|
|
|
|
142