UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X] Quarterly report pursuant section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010

[  ] Transition report pursuant section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from ________________ to ________________

Commission file number 000-31909

ALTERNET SYSTEMS INC.
(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

2665 S. Bayshore Dr.
Miami, Florida 33133  
Tel: 786-265-1840
(Address and telephone number of Registrant's principal
executive offices and principal place of business)

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X]    No [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [   ]    No [X]

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

PART 1 – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

Our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements for the six month period ended June 30, 2010 form part of this quarterly report. They are stated in United States Dollars (US$) and are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles.

ALTERNET SYSTEMS INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2010

(Unaudited – Prepared by Management)

The accompanying notes are an intergral part of these consolidated financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an intergral part of these consolidated financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an intergral part of these consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 1 – NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Alternet Systems Inc. (“Alternet” or the “Company”) designs, markets and sells proprietary software and hardware systems known as “SchoolWeb” and “CommunityWeb”. The Company’s products provide high speed Internet access to schools and rural communities, in North America and internationally. The Company also provides Voice over IP services, primarily in Latin America.

The Company was incorporated on June 26, 2000 in the State of Nevada as North Pacific Capital Corp. and was organized for the purpose of creating a corporate vehicle to locate and acquire an operating business. On December 19, 2001, the Company changed its name to Schoolweb Systems Inc. and on May 14, 2002 the Company changed its name to Alternet Systems Inc. (“Alternet” or the “Company”). On November 6, 2000, the Company filed a Form 10SB registration statement with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and as a result is subject to the regulations governing reporting issuers in the United States. On March 14, 2003, the Company was listed for quotation on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board.

By agreement entered into December 31, 2007, Alternet issued 4,000,000 shares of restricted common stock to the shareholders of TekVoice Communications, Inc., a Company incorporated on May 17, 2002 in the State of Florida, in exchange for all of the issued and outstanding shares of TekVoice Communications, Inc.

The acquisition resulted in the former shareholders of TekVoice Communications, Inc. acquiring 38.92% of the then outstanding shares of the Company and has been accounted for as a reverse merger with TekVoice Communications, Inc., the legal subsidiary, being treated as the accounting parent and Alternet, the legal parent, being treated as the accounting subsidiary. Accordingly, the consolidated results of operations of the Company include those of TekVoice Communications, Inc. for all periods shown and those of Alternet since the date of the reverse acquisition.

On July 29, 2009 the Company incorporated Alternet Transactions Systems, Inc. (“ATS”) in the State of Florida in partnership with Utiba PTE Ltd. The Company owns 5,100 shares (51%) of the outstanding shares of ATS with Utiba PTE Ltd. owning the remaining 4,900 (49%). ATS is doing business as Utiba Americas.

On September 17, 2009 the Company incorporated International Mobile Security, Inc. (“IMS”) in the State of Florida in partnership with General Services Holdings, LLC. The Company owns 6,000 shares (60%) of the outstanding shares of IMS with General Services Holdings, LLC. owning the remaining 4,000 (40%).

On January 11, 2010, AI Systems Group (Canada) Inc. was dissolved. All transactions incurred from January 1, 2010 to January 11, 2010 have been included in these financial statements.

The consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared on the basis of a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. At June 30, 2010 the Company had a working capital deficiency of $988,772. The Company’s continued operations are dependent on the successful implementation of its business plan, its ability to obtain additional financing as needed, continued support from creditors, settling its outstanding debts and ultimately attaining profitable operations.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated interim financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, AI Systems Group, Inc., AI Systems Group (Canada) Ltd., TekVoice Communications, Inc., Alternet Transactions Systems, Inc., and International Mobile Security, Inc. All significant intercompany transactions and account balances have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions
Preparation of the Company’s financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all liquid investments, with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased, to be cash equivalents.

Equipment
Fixed assets are recorded at cost and depreciated at the following rates:

Impairment of Long Lived Assets
Management monitors the recoverability of long-lived assets based on estimates using factors such as current market value, future asset utilization, and future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from its investment or use of the related assets. The Company’s policy is to record any impairment loss in the period when it is determined that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. Any impairment loss is calculated as the excess of the carrying value over estimated realizable value.

Revenue Recognition
Revenues are recognized when title transfers or services are rendered. Telecommunications services are billed at the end of the month the services are provided.

Foreign Currency Translation
The financial statements are presented in United States dollars. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 52, “Foreign Currency Translation”, foreign denominated monetary assets and liabilities are translated to their United States dollar equivalents using foreign exchange rates which prevailed at the balance sheet date. Revenue and expenses are translated at average rates of exchange during the year. Related translation adjustments are reported as a separate component of stockholders’ deficit, whereas gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in the results of operations.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments
In accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 107, the Company has determined the estimated fair value of financial instruments using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. The fair value of financial instruments classified as current assets or liabilities approximate carrying value due to the short-term maturity of the instruments.

Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under a method which requires the Company to recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company’s financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial statements carrying amounts and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates. The Company presently prepares its tax returns on the cash basis and financial statement on the accrual basis. No deferred tax assets or liabilities have been recognized at this time, since the Company has shown losses for both tax and financial reporting.

Stock-Based Compensation
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for stock-based awards under the recognition and measurement provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” using the intrinsic value method of accounting, under which compensation expense was only recognized if the exercise price of the Company’s employee stock options was less than the market price of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R “Share Based Payments”, using the modified prospective transition method. Under that transition method, compensation cost is recognized for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, and compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R. Results for prior periods have not been restated.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Stock-Based Compensation (continued)
All transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. Equity instruments issued to employees and the cost of the services received as consideration are measured and recognized based on the fair value of the equity instruments issued.

Loss per Share
The Company computes net earnings (loss) per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share”. SFAS No. 128 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the statement of operations. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period including warrants using the treasury stock method. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential common shares if their effect is anti-dilutive. As the Company has net losses, no common equivalent shares have been included in the computation of diluted net loss per share as the effect would be anti-dilutive.

Risk Management
The Company is exposed to credit risk through accounts receivable and therefore, the Company maintains adequate provisions for potential credit losses.

The Company’s functional currency is the United States dollar. The Company operates in foreign jurisdictions, giving rise to exposure to market risks from changes in foreign currency rates. The financial risk is the risk to the Company's operations that arises from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and the degree of volatility of these rates. Currently, the Company does not use derivative instruments to reduce its exposure to foreign currency risk.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No.165, Subsequent Events, which is effective for interim or annual financial statements issued after June 15, 2009. This statement requires the Company to disclose the period for which subsequent events have been reported and clarifies when subsequent events should be disclosed. This standard did not effect the Company’s reported financial position or results of operations.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No.166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, which is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. This statement amends SFAS No.140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and extinguishments of Liabilities, by removing the concept of special purpose entity from SFAS No.140. This statement also clarifies the objective of paragraph 9 of SFAS No.140 which is to determine whether a transferor and all of the entities included in the transferor’s financial statements being presented have surrendered control of transferred financial assets. This standard did not effect the Company’s reported financial position or results of operations.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No.167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No.46(R), which is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. This statement amends FASB Interpretation No.46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, by requiring an entity to perform an analysis to determine whether the entity’s variable interest or interest give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. This standard did not effect the Company’s reported financial position or results of operations.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No.168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, which replaces SFAS 162 and is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This statement identifies the sources of accounting principles and framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, the GAAP hierarchy. This standard did not effect the Company’s reported financial position or results of operations.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-01, Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash (Topic 505), which is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. This update identifies how companies should be reporting distributions to shareholders that offers them the ability to elect to receive the distribution in cash or an equivalent number of shares. It was determined that all distributions of shares relating to these payments should be recorded as new share issuances. This standard did not effect the Company’s reported financial position or results of operations.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-02, Consolidation (Topic 810), which replaces SFAS No. 160 and is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. This update establishes the accounting and reporting guidance for non-controlling interest and changes in ownership interests of a subsidiary. This standard did not effect the Company’s reported financial position or results of operations.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820), which replaces SFAS No. 157 and is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009 except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward activity in Level 3 fair value measurements which are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2010 and interim periods commencing December 16, 2009. This update identifies new disclosure requirements relating to fair value measurements. This standard did not effect the Company’s reported financial position or results of operations.

In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-09, Subsequent Event (Topic 855)s, which is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2010. This update addresses both the interaction of the requirements of Topic 855 with the SEC’s reporting requirements and the intended breadth of the reissuance disclosure provision related to subsequent events. This standard is not expected to have a significant effect on the Company’s reported financial position or results of operations.

In March 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-11, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), which is effective for financial statements issued at the beginning of the entity’s first fiscal quarter beginning after June 15, 2010. This update provides amendments to Subtopic 815-15, Derivatives and Hedging – Embedded Derivatives, such as clarification of the scope exception for embedded credit derivative features related to the transfer of credit risk in the form of subordination of one financial instrument to another and whether those derivatives are subject to potential bifurcation. This standard is not expected to have a significant effect on the Company’s reported financial position or results of operations.

In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-13, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718), which is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. This update addresses the classification of an employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in a currency that differs from the functional currency of the employer entity or payroll currency of the employee. This standard is not expected to have an effect on the Company’s reported financial position or results of operations.

In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-17, Revenue Recognition – Milestone Method (Topic 605), which is effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010. This update provides guidance on defining a milestone and determining when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research and development transactions. This standard is not expected to have an effect on the Company’s reported financial position or results of operations.

In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-18, Receivables (Topic 310), which is effective on a prospective basis for modifications of loans accounted for within pools occurring in the first interim or annual period ending on or after July 15, 2010. This update provides guidance on accounting for acquired loans that have evidence of credit deterioration upon acquisition. This standard is not expected to have an effect on the Company’s reported financial position or results of operations.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)

In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310), which for public entities, the disclosures as of the end of a reporting period are effective in financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2010 and for disclosures about activities that occur during a period are effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. This update provides guidance on increasing transparency about an entity’s allowance for credit losses and the credit quality of its financing receivables. This standard is not expected to have an effect on the Company’s reported financial position or results of operations.

NOTE 3 – FIXED ASSETS

NOTE 4 – CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE NOTES

On January 8, 2009, the Company issued a note payable in the amount of $48,464. The note carries interest at the rate of 10% per annum and is due on January 8, 2010. If the note is not repaid on maturity or in any other event of default, the holder is entitled to convert all or any portion of the original principal face value of the note into shares of common stock of the Company at a conversion value equal to 50% of the average market price of the Company’s stock for the 30 days prior to the date of conversion. As the loan had not been repaid by the maturity date, the loan was extended and interest continued to accrue. On April 22, 2010 the Company signed a Debt Settlement Agreement with the creditor whereby the creditor agreed to receive shares in lieu of payment of the outstanding balance. Under the terms of the Debt Settlement Agreement, the creditor is entitled to receive common stock of the Company at a conversion value equal to 50% of the average daily low price of the Company’s stock for the 20 days prior to the date of conversion. The holder may not hold more than 4.99% of the outstanding common stock of the Company at any point in time. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the creditor converted $55,141 of debt into 2,542,782 common shares of the company resulting in a full repayment of the loan.

NOTE 4 – CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE NOTES (continued)

On January 8, 2009, the Company issued a note payable in the amount of $48,517. The note carries interest at the rate of 10% per annum and is due on January 8, 2010. If the note is not repaid on maturity or in any other event of default, the holder is entitled to convert all or any portion of the original principal face value of the note into shares of common stock of the Company at a conversion value equal to 50% of the average market price of the Company’s stock for the 30 days prior to the date of conversion. As the loan had not been repaid by the maturity date, the loan was extended and interest continued to accrue. On April 22, 2010 the Company signed a Debt Settlement Agreement with the creditor whereby the creditor agreed to receive shares in lieu of payment of the outstanding balance. Under the terms of the Debt Settlement Agreement, the creditor is entitled to receive common stock of the Company at a conversion value equal to 50% of the average daily low price of the Company’s stock for the 20 days prior to the date of conversion. The holder may not hold more than 4.99% of the outstanding common stock of the Company at any point in time. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the creditor converted $55,066 of debt into 1,180,846 common shares of the company resulting in a full repayment of the loan.

On January 8, 2009, the Company issued a note payable in the amount of $42,085. The note carries interest at the rate of 10% per annum and is due on January 8, 2010. If the note is not repaid on maturity or in any other event of default, the holder is entitled to convert all or any portion of the original principal face value of the note into shares of common stock of the Company at a conversion value equal to 50% of the average market price of the Company’s stock for the 30 days prior to the date of conversion. On September 15, 2009, the balance outstanding on the note payable was agreed to be settled prior to the conversion date and as such the corresponding derivative liability was written off.

On December 18, 2009, the Company issued a note payable in the amount of $100,000. The note carries interest at the rate of 12% per annum and is due on March 18, 2010. If the note is not repaid on maturity or in any other event of default, the holder is entitled to convert all or any portion of the original principal face value of the note into shares of common stock of the Company at a conversion value equal to 80% of the lowest daily low price of the Company’s stock for the 30 trading days immediately preceding and including the date of conversion.

On December 18, 2009, the Company entered into a Debt Settlement agreement whereby a creditor agreed to receive shares in lieu of payment of a $152,916 promissory note. The holder is entitled to receive common stock of the Company at a conversion value equal to 50% of the lowest closing price of the Company’s stock for the 10 days prior to the date of conversion. The holder may not hold more than 4.99% of the outstanding common stock of the Company at any point in time. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the creditor converted $93,660 of debt into 3,935,898 common shares of the company.

On March 8, 2009, the Company issued a note payable in the amount of $25,000. The note carries interest at the rate of 12% per annum and is due on April 8, 2010. If the note is not repaid on maturity or in any other event of default, the holder is entitled to convert all or any portion of the original principal face value of the note into shares of common stock of the Company at a conversion value equal to 50% of the lowest closing price of the Company’s stock for the 10 trading days immediately preceding and including the date of conversion.

On April 14, 2010, the Company issued a note payable in the amount of $15,000. The note carries interest at the rate of 10% per annum and is due on May 18, 2010. If the note is not repaid on maturity or in any other event of default, the holder is entitled to convert all or any portion of the original principal face value of the note into shares of common stock of the Company at a conversion value equal to 50% of the lowest closing price of the Company’s stock for the 10 trading days immediately preceding and including the date of conversion.

On April 22, 2010, the Company entered into a Debt Settlement agreement whereby a creditor agreed to receive shares in lieu of payment of a $50,000 promissory note plus accrued interest calculated at 10% per annum. The creditor is entitled to receive common stock of the Company at a conversion value equal to 50% of the average daily low price of the Company’s stock for the 20 days prior to the date of conversion. The holder my not hold more than 4.99% of the outstanding common stock of the Company at any point in time. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the creditor converted $51,874 of debt into 1,703,169 common shares of the company.

NOTE 4 – CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE NOTES (continued)

On April 30, 2010, the Company issued a note payable in the amount of $100,000. The note carries interest at the rate of 10% per annum and is due on July 30, 2010. If the note is not repaid on maturity or in any other event of default, the holder is entitled to convert all or any portion of the original principal face value of the note into shares of common stock of the Company at a conversion value equal to 50% of the lowest daily low price of the Company’s stock for the 10 trading days immediately preceding and including the date of conversion.

On June 1, 2010, the Company entered into a Debt Settlement agreement whereby a creditor agreed to receive shares in lieu of payment of a $32,000 debt. The creditor is entitled to receive common stock of the Company at a conversion value equal to 50% of the lowest daily low price of the Company’s stock for the 20 days prior to the date of conversion. The holder my not hold more than 4.99% of the outstanding common stock of the Company at any point in time. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the creditor converted $51,874 of debt into 1,703,169 common shares of the company.

The Company accounts for debt with embedded conversion features and warrant issues in accordance with EITF 98-5: Accounting for convertible securities with beneficial conversion features or contingency adjustable conversion and EITF No. 00-27: Application of issue No 98-5 to certain convertible instruments. Conversion features determined to be beneficial to the holder are valued at fair value and recorded to additional paid in capital. The Company determines the fair value to be ascribed to the detachable warrants issued with the convertible debentures utilizing the Black-Scholes method. Any discount derived from determining the fair value to the debenture conversion features and warrants is amortized to financing cost over the life of the debenture. The unamortized costs if any, upon the conversion of the warrants is expensed to financing cost on a pro rata basis over the life of the warrant.

Debt issued with the variable conversion features are considered to be embedded derivatives and are accountable in accordance with FASB 161; Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. The fair value of the embedded derivative is recorded to derivative liability. This liability is required to be marked each reporting period. The resulting discount on the debt is amortized to interest expense over the life of the related debt.

NOTE 5 – CAPITAL STOCK

The Company is authorized to issue up to 100,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with a par value of $0.00001. As at June 30, 2010, 38,897,967 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding.

Effective January 29, 2008, the Company adopted a Retainer Stock Plan for Professional and Consultants (the “2008 Professional/Consultant Stock Compensation Plan”) for the purpose of providing the Company with the means to compensate, in the form of common stock of the Company, eligible consultants that have previously rendered services or that will render services during the term of this 2008 Professional/Consultant Stock Compensation Plan. A total of 6,000,000 common shares may be awarded under this plan. The Company filed a Registration Statement on Form S-8 to register the underlying shares included in the 2008 Plan. To date, 5,998,542 common shares valued at $431,631 relating to services provided have been awarded, leaving a balance of 1,458 shares which maybe awarded under this plan.

The Company is obligated to issue 300,000 (December 31, 2009 – 864,554) common shares valued at $19,500 (December 31, 2009 - $83,196) as at June 30, 2010 of which zero (December 31, 2009 – 450,000) shares valued at $Nil (December 31, 2009 - $56,250) are for services rendered by consultants during the year ended December 31, 2009, 300,000 shares are for services rendered by consultants during the current year, and zero (December 31, 2009 - 414,554) shares valued at $Nil (December 31, 2009 - $26,946) are for a debt settlement agreed on October 1, 2009. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, a liability to issued 200,000 (December 31, 2009 - 100,000) shares valued at $40,000 (December 31, 2009 - $50,000) owed to one consultant was written off to consulting fees as the consultant had not performed the services in accordance with the contract.

During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company issued 312,500 shares valued at $25,000 for cash received during the six months ended March 31, 2009 and 200,000 shares valued at $20,000 for services to be rendered over a one year period.

NOTE 5 – CAPITAL STOCK (continued)

During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued 250,000 shares valued at $16,250 for services rendered during the year ended December 31, 2009, 17,761,506 shares valued at $810,624 for debt settlement and convertible debenture agreements, and 633,691 shares valued at $95,053 for share subscriptions previously received. As at June 30, 2010, the Company has $145,362 (December 31, 2009 - $225,415) in private placement subscriptions which are reported as private placement subscriptions within stockholders’ deficit.

The shares which were not issued as at June 30, 2010 or June 30, 2009 were not used to compute the total weighted average shares outstanding as at June 30, 2010 or June 30, 2009 respectively and were thus not used in the basic net loss per share calculation.

NOTE 6 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

As at June 30, 2010, a total of $120,782 (December 31, 2009 - $566,714) was payable to directors of which $120,782 (December 31, 2009 -$528,597) is non-interest bearing and has no specific terms of repayment and $Nil (December 31, 2009 - $38,117) relates to the convertible debentures detailed in Note 4. Of the amount payable, $115,537 (December 31, 2009 - $484,684) is included in accounts payable for accrued fees and expense reimbursements.

During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the company expensed a total of $158,847 (December 31, 2009 - $424,668) in consulting fees, investor relations, and salaries paid to directors and officers of the Company. Of the amounts incurred, $87,923 (December 31, 2009 - $424,668) was accrued and $75,000 (December 31, 2009 - $Nil) was paid in cash.

During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the company issued 3,010,087 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $90,303 to two directors of the Company and 1,836,890 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $55,107 to a previous director of the Company for accrued consulting fees and investor relations.

NOTE 7 – DEFERRED COMPENSATION

On June 26, 2008, 1,500,000 common shares valued at $630,000 were issued to a consultant pursuant to a contract with certain terms and benchmarks. As at September 30, 2009 these benchmarks have not been met, thus the entire amount has been classified as deferred compensation.

On April 15, 2008, the Company entered into agreement with a consultant for a one-year term whereby the consultant will provide investor relations services to the Company in exchange for 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. On June 6, 2008, 100,000 common shares valued at $50,000 were issued to the consultant and 100,000 common shares valued at $50,000 were recorded as obligation to issue share during the year (refer to note 5). These amounts are being expensed over the life of the contract.

On May 12, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant for a one-year term whereby the consultant will provide business consulting services to the Company (valued at $76,500) in exchange for 150,000 shares of the Company’s common stock which was issued on May 23, 2008.

On September 15, 2008, the Company entered into agreement with two consultants for a one-year term whereby the consultants will provide marketing services to the Company (valued at $82,000) in exchange for 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The consultants will provide such services as developing sales channels for the Company’s products, developing marketing plans and maintaining customer relations and reporting to the Company’s board of directors as determined by the board.

On October 15, 2008, the Company entered into agreement with a consultant for a one-year term whereby the consultants will provide consulting services to the Company in exchange for 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. As of the year ended date, 200,000 common shares valued at $40,000 were recorded as obligation to issue share during the year (refer to note 5). These amounts are being expensed over the life of the contract.

NOTE 7 – DEFERRED COMPENSATION (continued)

On January 5, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant for a one-year term whereby the consultant will provide business consulting services to the Company in exchange for 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $20,000.

On December 8, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant for a one-year term whereby the consultant will provide business consulting services to the Company in exchange for 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $16,250 based on the date of issuance.

On January 5, 2009, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant for a one-year term whereby the consultant will provide business consulting services to the Company in exchange for 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $19,500. As the shares have not yet been issued, the stated value is subject to change.

The Company recorded the aggregate fair value of the shares issued pursuant to the above agreements as deferred compensation and amortizes the costs of all these services on a straight-line basis over the respective terms of the contracts. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company expensed $17,542 (December 31, 2009 - $263,212) relating to the above contracts. At June 30, 2010, the unamortized portion of the deferred compensation totalled $647,139 (December 31, 2009 - $645,181). The shares issued were all valued at their market price on the date of issuance.

NOTE 8 – LAWSUITS

On October 16, 2009, the Company received noticed that they had been named as Defendants in a lawsuit whereby the Plaintiffs are seeking a judgment of $39,000 plus interest thereon from March 11, 2009 for breach of contract. The Company had 30 days to respond to the notice before a default judgment is awarded. As at June 30, 2010, no amounts have been accrued as the likelihood of an unfavorable judgment is considered low.

On May 10, 2010, the Company received noticed that they had been named as Defendants in a lawsuit whereby the Plaintiffs are seeking a judgment of $6,889 including interest of $1,444 for unpaid invoices. The Company had 30 days to respond to the notice before a default judgment is awarded. As at June 30, 2010, the full amount has been accrued and is included in accounts payable.

NOTE 9 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS:

Overview

This quarterly report may contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These include statements about our expectations, beliefs, intentions or strategies for the future, which we indicate by words or phrases such as "anticipate," "expect," "intend," "plan," "will," "we believe," "our company believes," "management believes" and similar language. These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those set forth in the following discussion, including under the heading "Risk Factors". Our actual results may differ materially from results anticipated in these forward-looking statements. We base our forward-looking statements on information currently available to us, and we assume no obligation to update them. In addition, our historical financial performance is not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected in the future and we believe that such comparisons cannot be relied upon as indicators of future performance. Other important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include the following: business conditions, the price of precious metals, ability to attract and retain personnel; the price of the Company's stock; and the risk factors set forth from time to time in the Company's SEC reports, including but not limited to its annual report on Form 10-K; its quarterly reports on Forms 10-Q; and any reports on Form 8-K. In addition, the Company disclaims any obligation to update or correct any forward-looking statements in all the Company's annual reports and SEC filings to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof.

Company History and Business

Alternet Systems, Inc. (the "Company"), was organized under the laws of the State of Nevada on June 26, 2000 under the name North Pacific Capital Corp. On December 20, 2001 the Company received shareholder approval to change its name from North Pacific Capital Corp. to "SchoolWeb Systems Inc.".

On April 26, 2002, the Company received shareholder approval to change its name from SchoolWeb Systems Inc. to Alternet Systems, Inc. and in May of 2002 this change of name was completed.

Alternet Systems, Inc. previous to the merger with TekVoice, sold network systems and software for education and healthcare, marketed under the names "SchoolWeb" and HealthWeb.

Alternet Systems has been granted trademark rights in the Canada for the trademark "SchoolWeb". The initial application was filed in Canada on March 30, 2001 and it was granted in March of 2003. The trademark is also registered on the supplemental register in the United States, as the United States trademark was applied for based on the Canadian trademark application. Once a company has used a supplemental register mark in the United States for five years, the company's mark is placed on the full register. In the meantime, its rights in the United States are protected.

TekVoice Inc. Merger

Alternet Systems Inc. executed a merger with TekVoice Communications, Inc. of Miami, Florida, on December 31, 2007 . TekVoice is a telecommunications services company with operations in North America and Latin America. The combined entity is called Alternet Systems Inc. and its primary business is delivering electronic transaction services, telecom services; and education / healthcare application software and content; and to customers primarily located in Latin America, North America and the Caribbean. Alternet offers a portfolio of next-generation solutions for government, business, schools, hospitals and residents.

About TekVoice Communications Inc.

TekVoice Communications, Inc. is a Voice over IP telecommunications company that since 2002, offers convergent voice and data services over IP networks., TekVoice has capitalized on its in-depth knowledge of the Hispanic and Latin American market, the quality of its telecommunications network and the dramatic cost savings that the network delivers to its customers. As a pioneer in the VOIP industry, TekVoice has been at the leading edge in the design and deployment of new products and services for the corporate and residential markets. TekVoice Communications, Inc. is a U.S. corporation with offices in Miami, Florida.

TekVoice Share Acquisition On December 31, 2007, Alternet Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) Fabio Alvino, Eduardo & Monica Bello, Henryk Dabrowski, Manfred Koroschetz, New Market Technology, Inc., John Puente, Red Hawke, Inc., Hector Rodriguez (each, a “Transferor” and collectively, the “Transferors”) and TekVoice Communications, Inc. (“TekVoice”)entered into and closed a Stock Acquisition Agreement (the “Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of TekVoice from the Transferors in consideration for an aggregate amount of four million (4,000,000) shares of common stock of the Company (the “Acquisition Shares”). In addition to the Acquisition Shares, the Transferors, in the aggregate, shall be entitled to receive an up to an additional two million (2,000,000) shares of common stock of the Company if TekVoice’s sales for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008 exceed sales for fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 by twenty percent (20%) (the “Additional Consideration”). In the event the Company is merged with another entity prior to December 31, 2008, the Additional Consideration shall be issued to the Transferors on the day immediately prior to the day that such merger takes place. The Transferors shall be entitled to appoint three (3) members to the Company’s board of directors, effective at the closing, provided , however , in no event shall Transferors be required to appoint a member to the Company’s Board of Directors.

The Company’s results, on a consolidated basis, reflected its own results consolidated with its subsidiary TekVoice Communications Inc. For the remainder of this part, the term “Company” refers to both the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary above.

On July 29, 2009 the Company incorporated Alternet Transactions Systems, Inc. (“ATS”) in the State of Florida in partnership with Utiba PTE Ltd. The Company owns 5,100 shares (51%) of the outstanding shares of ATS with Utiba PTE Ltd. owning the remaining 4,900 (49%). ATS is doing business as Utiba Americas. As at December 31, 2009, ATS has not incurred nay transactions.

On September 17, 2009 the Company incorporated International Mobile Security, Inc. (“IMS”) in the State of Florida in partnership with General Services Holdings, LLC. The Company owns 6,000 shares (60%) of the outstanding shares of IMS with General Services Holdings, LLC. owning the remaining 4,000 (40%). As at December 31, 2009, IMS has not incurred nay transactions

Plan of Operation

Over the next year, the Company will be concentrating on marketing its mobile financial transaction and telecommunications platforms, in the telecommunication, public utility, government and financial industries.

Sales and marketing is accomplished through the Company’s existing sales staff, who contact potential clients through personal and agent sales, trade shows and industry associations.

Sales will come from organic growth from its existing operations. The Company may identify in the course of business, strategic acquisition targets.

Company has accomplished the execution of framework agreements with critical vendors, and is in the process of launching its mobile financial and mobile commerce suite of services.

We have also initiated a program to participate in the financial services industry, by enabling cellular phone technologies that will allow customers to make “mobile to mobile”, “mobile to cash” and “mobile to money remittances”.

Demand for our services is driven primarily by mobile subscriber purchasing activity via their cellular phone. The global mobile commerce industry is in its early growth and adoption stages. The drivers for growth are cellular phone penetration, large unbanked population worldwide, user acceptance of the cell phone as a means of payment. Subscriber adoption of new wireless technologies and services can also drive demand for our services due to the resulting increase in interoperability complexities. We believe that as wireless usage expands and complexity continues to increase, the demand for our services will grow.

A structured plan has been defined to close and pursue opportunities. The company has a funnel of potential prospects in different stages of closing. The needs and opportunities of these initial prospects have been identified and we are preparing offers and agreements.

The Company will be updating its marketing material, including web presence and technical information. It will also be focusing on its electronic transaction products, targeting specific vertical industries, specifically the telecom, financial, utilities and transportation sectors.

Currently our sales and business development partners have identified and pursued projects in Colombia, Ecuador, Bolivia, Guatemala, Panama, Mexico, Brasil, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Honduras, Venezuela, Guyana, Haiti, Dominican Republic and the United States.

Although the Company believes that demand exists for its products and services, there can be no assurance that sales will increase in the future. The Company is expected to remain dependent upon debt or equity financing unless revenues from operations grow significantly.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009

Net Sales

For the six months ended June 30 2010, the Company had $97,604 in sales compared to $161,830 for the corresponding period in 2009. The decrease in sales resulted from a decrease in VoIP telephony sales from the Company’s subsidiary, TekVoice Inc.

Gross Profit

Gross profit was $64,240 in the six months ending June 30, 2010 compared to a gross profit of $79,610 in the six month period ending June 30, 2008. This represents a decrease in gross profit for the period of $15,370.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

For the six months ended June 30 2010, the Company had office and general expenses of $12,470, marketing expenses of $1,490, management and consulting fees of $417,800 professional fees of $50,249 and rent of $13,974.

For the corresponding period in 2008 the Company incurred office and general expenses of $12,470; marketing expenses of $1490; management and consulting fees of $417,800; $50,249 in professional fees and $13974 in rent. Rent expense was reduced in the period due to the company moving to more cost effective premises.

Accounts payable totaled $399,406 and accounts receivable were $18,841 at June 30, 2010

Net Loss

For the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company had a net loss of $ 992,781 or $(0.04) per share, which was a increase of 21% when compared to the net loss for the corresponding period to June 30 2008 of $787,811 or $(0.04) per share. The increased loss was primarily due to increased financing costs during the period ending June 30 2010.

Interest and other expenses

The Company had no material interest expenses.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company had current assets including cash on hand of $99,307 as at June 30, 2010. The Company also had a net loss of $992,781 during the six months ended June 30, 2010.

The Company had a working capital deficiency of $988,772 at June 30 2010. Management of the Company has determined that the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on raising additional capital and achieving increased sales of its TekVoice, Electronic Transaction and SchoolWeb / HealthWeb products.

Management can give no assurance that any increase in sales will occur in the future and if they do occur, may not be enough to cover the Company’s operating expenses or any other costs. Should this be the case, we would be forced, unless sufficient working capital can be raised, to suspend operations and possibly liquidate the assets and wind up and dissolve the Company.

RISK FACTORS

The Company is exposed to a number of risks, including the following:

• The Company may be unable to market and sell its software and sales of its telecommunications products could decline;
   
• The Company has a history of operating its software business at a significant loss;
   
• The Company requires additional equity financing to continue operations and may be unable to obtain this financing;
   
• If further equity financing is obtained, it will dilute the value of existing shareholders’ stock;
   
• The Company has limited working capital with which to continue operations;
   
• The telecom and software industries are extremely competitive and the Company faces competition from more established distributors and producers with greater financial resources and established sales and distribution capabilities;
   
• The Company has a significant number of shares outstanding which may be eligible for resale under Rule 144 and which, if sold, could depress the market price of the Company’s shares;
   
• The profit margins in the telecom industry have been steadily eroding such that, even if it is able to make sales for its products, the Company may be unable to do so at a profitable margin.
   
• We have had negative cash flows from operations. If we are unable to obtain financing in the amounts and on terms deemed acceptable to us, we may be unable to continue our business and as a result may be required to scale back or cease operations for our business, the result of which would be that our stockholders would lose some or all of their investment. To date we have had negative cash flows from operations and we have been dependent on sales of our equity securities and debt financing to meet our cash. We do not expect positive cash flow from operations in the near term and there is no assurance that actual cash requirements will not exceed our estimates, or that our sales projections will be realized as estimated. The occurrence of any of the aforementioned events could adversely affect our ability to meet our business plans.

• We will depend almost exclusively on outside capital to pay for the continued development of our business. Such outside capital may include the sale of additional stock and/or commercial borrowing. Capital may not continue to be available if necessary to meet these continuing development costs or, if the capital is available, that it will be on terms acceptable to us. The issuance of additional equity securities by us would result in a significant dilution in the equity interests of our current stockholders. Obtaining commercial loans, assuming those loans would be available, will increase our liabilities and future cash commitments. If we are unable to obtain financing in the amounts and on terms deemed acceptable to us, we may be unable to continue our business and as a result may be required to scale back or cease operations for our business, the result of which would be that our stockholders would lose some or all of their investment.
   
• A decline in the price of our common stock could affect our ability to raise further working capital and adversely impact our operations.
  A prolonged decline in the price of our common stock could result in a reduction in the liquidity of our common stock and a reduction in our ability to raise capital. Because our operations have been primarily financed through the sale of equity securities, a decline in the price of our common stock could be especially detrimental to our liquidity and our continued operations. Any reduction in our ability to raise equity capital in the future would force us to reallocate funds from other planned uses and would have a significant negative effect on our business plans and operations, including our ability to develop new products and continue our current operations. If our stock price declines, we may not be able to raise additional capital or generate funds from operations sufficient to meet our obligations.
   
• We have a history of losses and fluctuating operating results.
  There is no assurance that we will operate profitably or will generate positive cash flow in the future. In addition, our operating results in the future may be subject to significant fluctuations due to many factors not within our control, such as the unpredictability of when customers will purchase our products and/or services, the size of customers’ purchases, the demand for our production and/or services, and the level of competition and general economic conditions. If we cannot generate positive cash flows in the future, or raise sufficient financing to continue our normal operations, then we may be forced to scale down or even close our operations.
   
• We have a limited operating history and if we are not successful in continuing to grow our business, then we may have to scale back or even cease our ongoing business operations.
  We have limited history of revenues from operations and have limited significant tangible assets. We have yet to generate positive earnings and there can be no assurance that we will ever operate profitably. Our company has a limited operating history and must be considered in the development stage. Our company’s operations will be subject to all the risks inherent in the establishment of a developing enterprise and the uncertainties arising from the absence of a significant operating history. We are in the development stage and potential investors should be aware of the difficulties normally encountered by enterprises in the development stage. If our business plan is not successful, and we are not able to operate profitably, investors may lose some or all of their investment in our company.

• Trading of our stock may be restricted by the SEC's "Penny Stock" regulations, which may limit a stockholder's ability to buy and sell our stock.
  The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted regulations which generally define "penny stock" to be any equity security that has a market price (as defined) less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Our securities are covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and "accredited investors." The term "accredited investor" refers generally to institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the SEC, which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer's account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer's confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the stock that is subject to these penny stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to trade our securities. We believe that the penny stock rules discourage investor interest in and limit the marketability of, our common stock.
   
• The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or FINRA, has adopted sales practice requirements which may also limit a stockholder's ability to buy and sell our stock.
  In addition to the "penny stock" rules described above, FINRA has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer's financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.

• Trading in our common shares on the OTC Bulletin Board is limited and sporadic making it difficult for our shareholders to sell their shares or liquidate their investments.
  Our common shares are currently listed for public trading on the OTC Bulletin Board. The trading price of our common shares has been subject to wide fluctuations. Trading prices of our common shares may fluctuate in response to a number of factors, many of which will be beyond our control. The stock market has generally experienced extreme

price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of companies with no current business operation. There can be no assurance that trading prices and price earnings ratios previously experienced by our common shares will be matched or maintained. These broad market and industry factors may adversely affect the market price of our common shares, regardless of our operating performance.
In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company's securities, securities class-action litigation has often been instituted. Such litigation, if instituted, could result in substantial costs for us and a diversion of management's attention and resources.
 
• Because of the early stage of development and the nature of our business, our securities are considered highly speculative.
  Our securities must be considered highly speculative, generally because of the nature of our business and the early stage of its development.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No.161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities , which is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The statement amends and expands the disclosure requirements of Statement 133 and requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. The Company has expanded the information included in Note 4 – Convertible Debenture Notes to include the new requirements. This standard did not effect the Company’s reported financial position or results of operations.

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No.162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, which is effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411. This statement identifies the sources of accounting principles and framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, the GAAP hierarchy. This standard did not effect the Company’s reported financial position or results of operations.

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No.163, Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance Contract, which is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. This statement requires that an insurance enterprise recognize a claim liability prior to an event of default when there is evidence that credit deterioration has occurred in an insured financial obligation. This Statement also clarifies how Statement 60, Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises, applies to financial guarantee insurance contract, including the recognition and measurement to be used to account for premium revenue and claim liabilities. This standard did not effect the Company’s reported financial position or results of operations.

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No.165, Subsequent Events, which is effective for interim or annual financial statements issued after June 15, 2009. This statement requires the Company to disclose the period for which subsequent events have been reported and clarifies when subsequent events should be disclosed. This standard did not effect the Company’s reported financial position or results of operations.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No.166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, which is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. This statement amends SFAS No.140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and extinguishments of Liabilities, by removing the concept of special purpose entity from SFAS No.140. This statement also clarifies the objective of paragraph 9 of SFAS No.140 which is to determine whether a transferor and all of the entities included in the transferor’s financial statements being presented have surrendered control of transferred financial assets. This standard did not effect the Company’s reported financial position or results of operations.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No.167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No.46(R), which is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. This statement amends FASB Interpretation No.46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, by requiring an entity to perform an analysis to determine whether the entity’s variable interest or interest give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. This standard did not effect the Company’s reported financial position or results of operations.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No.168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and t he Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, which replaces SFAS 162 and is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. This statement identifies the sources of accounting principles and framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, the GAAP hierarchy. This standard did not effect the Company’s reported financial position or results of operations.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-01, Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash (Topic 505), which is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. This update identifies how companies should be reporting distributions to shareholders that offers them the ability to elect to receive the distribution in cash or an equivalent number of shares. It was determined that all distributions of shares relating to these payments should be recorded as new share issuances. This standard did not effect the Company’s reported financial position or results of operations.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-02, Consolidation (Topic 810), which replaces SFAS No. 160 and is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. This update establishes the accounting and reporting guidance for non-controlling interest and changes in ownership interests of a subsidiary. This standard did not effect the Company’s reported financial position or results of operations.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820), which replaces SFAS No. 157 and is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009 except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward activity in Level 3 fair value measurements which are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2010 and interim periods commencing December 16, 2009. This update identifies new disclosure requirements relating to fair value measurements. This standard did not effect the Company’s reported financial position or results of operations.

In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-09, Subsequent Event (Topic 855)s, which is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2010. This update addresses both the interaction of the requirements of Topic 855 with the SEC’s reporting requirements and the intended breadth of the reissuance disclosure provision related to subsequent events. This standard is not expected to have a significant effect on the Company’s reported financial position or results of operations.

In March 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-11, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), which is effective for financial statements issued at the beginning of the entity’s first fiscal quarter beginning after June 15, 2010. This update provides amendments to Subtopic 815-15, Derivatives and Hedging – Embedded Derivatives, such as clarification of the scope exception for embedded credit derivative features related to the transfer of credit risk in the form of subordination of one financial instrument to another and whether those derivatives are subject to potential bifurcation. This standard is not expected to have a significant effect on the Company’s reported financial position or results of operations.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Not applicable

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Management’s Report on Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 , as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our president (also our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As of June 30, 2010, the end of our second quarter covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our president (also our principal executive officer) and our secretary, treasurer and chief financial officer (also our principal financial and accounting officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, our president (also our principal executive officer) and our secretary, treasurer and chief financial officer (also our principal financial and accounting officer) concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in providing reasonable assurance in the reliability of our financial reports as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no significant changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2010 that have materially or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Other than as described below, management is not aware of any legal proceedings (either presently engaged in or contemplated) by any government authority or other party involving the Company, its properties or its products.

On March 14, 2005 the Company was named as a defendant in a Writ of Summons and Statement of Claim in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, Vancouver Registry in which the Native Trade and Investment Association requested an order to pay the Plaintiff Cdn $53,500 and 100,000 common shares for trade shows attended by the Company. On February 6 2007 The Supreme Court of British Columbia ordered the Company to pay NITA $53,500 plus interest of $4,126 and costs of $5,673 and 100,000 common shares, which were paid in March 2007. No directors, officers, or affiliate of the Company is (i) a party adverse to the Company in any legal proceedings, or (ii) has an adverse interest to the Company in any legal proceedings.

On June 30, 2008, the Company filed an action in the Circuit Court in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida against a customer seeking to recover a total of $142,121 for services and loans provided. The Company is also seeking to recover interest and attorneys' fees and costs. The likelihood of any results from the above lawsuit is not determinable at this time, consequently the company has made bad debt provisions for the entire amounts.

On October 16 2009 the Company received notice that they had been named as Defendants in a lawsuit whereby the Plaintiffs are seeking a judgement of $39,000 plus interest thereon from March 11 2009 for breach of contract. As at September 30 2009 no amounts have been accrued as the result of the lawsuit is not determinable at this time.

On May 10, 2010, the Company received noticed that they had been named as Defendants in a lawsuit whereby the Plaintiffs are seeking a judgment of $6,889 including interest of $1,444 for unpaid invoices. The Company had 30 days to respond to the notice before a default judgment is awarded. As at June 30, 2010, the full amount has been accrued and is included in accounts payable.

No directors, officers, or affiliate of the Company is (i) a party adverse to the Company in any legal proceedings, or (ii) has an adverse interest to the Company in any legal proceedings.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

During the quarter ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued 250,000 shares valued at $16,250 for services rendered during the year ended December 31, 2009, 17,761,506 shares valued at $810,624 for debt settlement and convertible debenture agreements, and 633,691 shares valued at $95,053 for share subscriptions previously received. As at June 30, 2010, the Company has $145,362 (December 31, 2009 - $225,415) in private placement subscriptions which are reported as private placement subscriptions within stockholders’ deficit.

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a) Reports on Form 8-K. The Registrant filed one report on Form 8K during the period ending June 30 2010 and one subsequent to the period on July 2 2010

(b) Exhibits. Exhibits included or incorporated by reference herein: See Exhibit Index below.

EXHIBIT INDEX

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

ALTERNET SYSTEMS INC.

By: /s/ Henryk Dabrowski                                  
Henryk Dabrowski, President
(Principal Executive Officer)
August 12, 2010

By: /s/ Luz Villanueva                                        
Luz Villanueva, Secretary, Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
August 12, 2010