Nevada
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
86-0945116
(I.R.S.
employer
identification
number)
|
425
Madison Ave., Suite 902, New York, New York, 10017
(Address
of principal executive offices and zip code)
(212)
874-6008
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area
code)
|
Page
|
||||
PART
I
|
||||
Item
1.
|
Description
of Business
|
3
|
||
Item
2.
|
Description
of Property
|
16
|
||
Item
3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
16
|
||
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
16
|
||
PART
II
|
||||
Item
5.
|
Market
for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
|
17
|
||
Item
6.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation
|
19
|
||
Item
6.
|
Risk
Factors
|
25
|
||
Item
7.
|
Financial
Statements
|
41
|
||
Item
8.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
|
41
|
||
Item
8A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
41
|
||
Item
8B.
|
Other
Information
|
43
|
||
PART
III
|
||||
Item
9.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons; Compliance with
Section
16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
|
44
|
||
Item
10.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
47
|
||
Item
11.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
|
49
|
||
Item
12.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions
|
51
|
||
Item
13.
|
Exhibits
|
52
|
||
Item
14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
53
|
||
SIGNATURES
|
53
|
|||
EXHIBIT
INDEX
|
54
|
•
|
The
Id proteins have been shown to be a key component for tumor
angiogenesis.
|
•
|
The
Id proteins are fetal specific and are only re-expressed during tumor
vascularization but not in normal adult vasculature (with the exception
of
wound healing and reproductive functions) making it possible to design
drugs that are not expected to cause
side-effects
|
•
|
Only
partial reduction in Id activity causes a significant inhibition
of tumor
angiogenesis.
|
•
|
The
mechanism of Id action is well understood-thus allowing high-throughput
screening and rational design of drug
candidates.
|
•
|
Inactivation
of Id before or after tumor formation is effective in preventing
or
limiting tumor growth in animal models that we believe is reasonably
predictive of human activity.
|
•
|
Compounds
of a known chemical class have been identified that bind and inhibit
the
Id protein in a biochemical and a cell culture
screen.
|
Drug
|
Company
|
Action(s)
|
Clinical
status
|
|||
Avastin
|
Genentech,
Inc.
|
Monoclonal
|
Market
approval first-line or previously untreated metastatic cancer of
the
antibody to VEGF colon or rectum received Q1/04 Phase III for adjuvant
colorectal cancer, renal cell carcinoma, prostate cancer, and metastatic
and locally advanced pancreatic cancer
|
|||
Neovastat
AE-941
|
NCI,
Aeterna,
Zentaris
Inc.,
|
Multiple
|
Phase
III for NSCLC mechanisms, eg inhibits
MMPs, blocks binding of
VEGF
to its receptor, promotes apoptosis of endothelial cells and
increases
levels of angiostatin, a naturally occurring anti- angiogenic
agent.
|
|||
Thalidomide
|
Celgene
|
Immunomodulation
|
NDA
submitted for multiple myeloma, Phase III for renal cell cancer,
Phase II
for prostate
|
|||
Revlimid/Actimed
|
Celgene
|
Immunomodulatory
|
Phase
II/III for prostate thalidomide and multiple myeloma, analogs Phase
III
for metastaic melanoma, Phase II for solid tumors and
MDS
|
|||
Combrestatin-A4
|
OXiGene
|
Directly
inhibits
|
Phase
I/II for advanced endothelial cells colorectal cancer, Phase II
for
breast, Phase I for cervical, Phase I/II for head/neck cancer,
Phase II
for lung cancer, Phase II for ovarian cancer, Phase I/II prostate
cancer,
Phase II for advanced regional or metastatic anaplastic thryoid
cancer
|
|||
PTK787
ZK222584
|
Schering
AG
|
Inhibits
VEGF receptor
tyrosine
kinases
|
Phase
III for colorectal
|
|||
BMS-275291
|
Bristol
Meyers Squibb
Co.
|
MMP
inhibitor
|
Phase
III combination with Paclitaxel
and Carboplatin for for
NSCL
|
|||
Cilengitide
(EMD121974)
|
Merck
KGaA
|
Integrin
inhibitor
|
Phase
I for solid tumors or lymphoma
|
|||
Panzem
|
EntreMed,
Inc.
|
Steroid
(2-Methoxy
estradiol)
|
Phase
II for various solid tumors
|
|||
LY317615
|
Eli
Lilly & Co.
|
Protein
kinase C Inhibitor
|
Phase
II for gliomas & lymphomas
|
|||
IL-12
+ IL-2
|
NCI,
Chiron, Wyeth
|
Multiple
mechanisms
|
Phase
I for lymphoma, Phase I
for neuroblastoma
|
|||
IL-12
|
Wyeth,
NCI
|
Multiple
Mechanisms
|
Phase
II for lymphoma, Phase
II for ovarian, Phase
I
for kidney, Phase I for solid
tumors
|
|||
Fragmin
|
Pfizer,
Inc.
|
Blocks
matrix
|
Phase
II/III for pancreatic breakdown
|
|||
Suramin
|
Pfizer,
Inc.
|
Blocks
matrix
|
Kidney
Phase I/II, breast cancer Phase I/II Phase I
for
bladder breakdown
|
|||
VEGF-Trap
AVE0005
|
Sanofi-Aventis
|
Blocks
VEGF
|
Phase
I for solid tumors,
|
|||
Regeneron
Pharmaceuticals
Inc.
|
|
Phase
I for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
|
||||
Vitaxin
|
Medimmune,
Inc. inhibits
key
integrin
|
Antibody
that
|
Phase
II for melanoma and prostate
cancer
|
|||
ZD6474
|
AstraZeneca
Plc
|
Blocks
VEGF and EGF
receptors
|
Phase III for myeloma, SCLC and NSCLC, Phase II for solid tumors | |||
PI-88
|
Progen
Industries Ltd.
|
Mechanism
not established
|
Phase
II for myeloma, liver and
lung cancer
|
|||
IMC-1121b
|
Imclone
|
Inhibition
of VEGFR-2
|
Phase
I for solid tumors
|
|||
CDP791
|
Imclone
|
Inhibition
of VEGFR-2
|
Phase
II for solid tumors
|
·
|
Preclinical laboratory and animal tests; |
·
|
Submission
of an Investigational New Drug application or “IND”, which must become
effective before human clinical trials may
begin;
|
·
|
Adequate
and well-controlled human clinical trials to establish the safety
and
efficacy of the product candidate for its intended
use;
|
·
|
Submission to the FDA of an New Drug Application or “NDA”; and |
·
|
FDA review and approval of an NDA. |
Nominee
|
|
Total
Votes For All Nominees
|
|
Total
Votes Withheld From All Nominees
|
William
Garland
|
|
11,009,115
|
|
0
|
Martin
Murray
|
|
11,009,115
|
|
0
|
Richard
Salvador
|
|
11,009,115
|
|
0
|
Michael
Strage
|
|
11,009,115
|
|
0
|
Total
Votes For
|
|
Total
Votes Against
|
|
Abstained
|
11,008,115
|
|
1,000
|
|
YEAR
|
PERIOD
|
HIGH
|
LOW
|
|||||||
Fiscal
Year 2007
|
Second
Quarter
|
$
|
0.54
|
$
|
0.31
|
|||||
Third
Quarter
|
$
|
0.85
|
$
|
0.51
|
||||||
Fourth
Quarter
|
$
|
0.65
|
$
|
0.85
|
·
|
our
existing capital resources and interest earned on that
capital;
|
·
|
royalty
income, if any, from licensed product sales by BioCheck,
Inc.;
|
·
|
annual
minimum royalty payments from BioCheck if aggregate royalty income
received by AngioGenex during the twelve months ending in the second
quarter of 2009 is less than
$50,000;
|
·
|
through
future private placement financing.
|
·
|
the
progress and magnitude of our product development
programs,
|
·
|
the
scope and results of product development
testing,
|
·
|
the
costs under current and future license agreements for our product
candidates, including the costs of obtaining and maintaining patent
protection for our product candidates,
|
·
|
the
costs of acquiring any technologies or additional product
candidates,
|
·
|
the
rate of technological advances,
|
·
|
the
commercial potential of our product
candidates,
|
·
|
the
magnitude of our administrative and legal expenses, including office
and
research development facilities rent, and
|
·
|
the
costs of establishing third party arrangements for
manufacturing.
|
·
|
the
amount of revenues we may generate from our license agreement with
BioCheck, Inc..
|
·
|
raise
sufficient capital in the public and/or private
markets;
|
·
|
obtain
the regulatory approvals necessary to commence selling its therapeutic
drugs or diagnostic products in the U.S., Europe or
elsewhere;
|
·
|
develop
and manufacture drugs in a manner that enables AngioGenex to be profitable
and meets regulatory, strategic partner and customer
requirements;
|
·
|
develop
and maintain relationships with key vendors and strategic partners
that
will be necessary to optimize the market value of the drugs AngioGenex
plans to develop
|
·
|
respond
effectively to competitive pressures; or
|
·
|
recruit
and build a management team to accomplish AngioGenex's business
plan.
|
·
|
difficulty
in securing centers to conduct trials;
|
·
|
difficulty
in enrolling patients in conformity with required protocols or projected
timelines;
|
·
|
unexpected
adverse reactions by patients or a temporary suspension or complete
ban on
trials of AngioGenex's products due to adverse side
effects;
|
·
|
clinical
trials may not yield sufficiently conclusive results for regulatory
agencies to approve the use of AngioGenex's lead product, other products
in development, or any other products AngioGenex may acquire or
in-license;
|
·
|
there
can be delays, sometimes long delays, in obtaining approval for its
product candidates;
|
·
|
the
rules and regulations governing product candidates can change during
the
review process, which can result in the need to spend time and money
for
further testing or review;
|
·
|
if
approval for commercialization is granted, it is possible the authorized
use will be more limited than we believe is necessary for commercial
success, or that approval may be conditioned on completion of further
clinical trials or other activities; and
|
·
|
once
granted, approval can be withdrawn, or limited, if previously unknown
problems arise with AngioGenex's human-use product or data arising
from
its use.
|
·
|
changes
to applicable regulatory requirements;
|
·
|
unforeseen
safety issues;
|
·
|
determination
of dosing issues;
|
·
|
lack
of effectiveness in the clinical trials;
|
·
|
slower
than expected rates of patient
recruitment;
|
·
|
inability
to monitor patients adequately during or after
treatment;
|
·
|
inability
or unwillingness of medical investigators to follow AngioGenex's
clinical
protocols;
|
·
|
inability
to maintain a supply of the investigational drug in sufficient quantities
to support the trials; and
|
·
|
suspension
or termination of clinical trials for various reasons, including
noncompliance with regulatory requirements or changes in the clinical
care
protocols and standards of care within the institutions in which
AngioGenex's trials take place.
|
·
|
Most
competitors have greater financial resources and can afford more
technical
and development setbacks than we can.
|
·
|
Most
competitors have been in the drug-discovery and drug-development business
longer than we have. They have greater experience than us in critical
areas like clinical testing, obtaining regulatory approval, and sales
and
marketing. This experience and their name recognition give them a
competitive advantage over AngioGenex.
|
·
|
Some
competitors may have a better patent position protecting their technology
than AngioGenex has or will have to protect its technology. If AngioGenex
cannot use AngioGenex's proprietary rights to prevent others from
copying
AngioGenex's technology or developing similar technology, then
AngioGenex's competitive position will be
harmed.
|
·
|
Some
companies with competitive technologies may move through stages of
development, approval, and marketing faster than we do. If a competitor
receives FDA approval before AngioGenex, then it will be authorized
to
sell its products before AngioGenex can sell its products. The first
company "to market" often has a significant advantage over latecomers;
a
second-place position could result in less-than-anticipated
sales.
|
·
|
The
recent completion of the sequencing of the human genome may result
in an
acceleration of competing products due to enhanced information about
disease states and the factors that contribute to the
disease.
|
·
|
disputes
with respect to payments that we believe are due under a collaboration
agreement;
|
·
|
disagreements
with respect to ownership of intellectual property
rights;
|
·
|
unwillingness
on the part of a collaborator to keep us informed regarding the progress
of its development and commercialization activities, or to permit
public
disclosure of these activities;
|
·
|
delay
of a collaborator's development or commercialization efforts with
respect
to drug candidates; or
|
·
|
termination
or non-renewal of the
collaboration.
|
·
|
The
United States or foreign patent offices may not grant patents of
meaningful scope based on the applications we have already filed
and those
we intend to file. If our current patents do not adequately protect
its
drug molecules and the indications for their use, then management
will not
be able to prevent imitation and any product may not be commercially
viable.
|
·
|
Some
of the issued patents we now license may be determined to be invalid.
If
we have to defend the validity of its patents the costs of such defense
could be substantial, and there is no guarantee of a successful outcome.
In the event any of the patents in-licensed is found to be invalid,
we may
lose its competitive position and may not be able to receive royalties
for
products covered in part or whole by that patent under license
agreements.
|
·
|
In
addition, changes in or different interpretations of patent laws
in the
United States and foreign countries may permit others to use discoveries
or to develop and commercialize technology and products without providing
any compensation to us. The laws of some countries do not protect
intellectual property rights to the same extent as U.S. laws and
those
countries may lack adequate rules and procedures for defending the
intellectual property rights. For example, some countries, including
many
in Europe, do not grant patent claims directed to methods of treating
humans, and in these countries patent protection may not be available
at
all to protect
|
·
|
payment
of damages, potentially treble damages, if we are found to have willfully
infringed a party's patent rights;
|
·
|
injunctive
or other equitable relief that may effectively block the ability
to
further develop, commercialize and sell products;
or
|
·
|
we
or our collaborators having to enter into license arrangements that
may
not be available on commercially acceptable terms, if at
all.
|
|
·
|
our
financial results;
|
|
·
|
fluctuations
in our operating results;
|
|
·
|
announcements
of technological innovations or new commercial health care products
or
therapeutic products by us or our competitors;
|
|
·
|
government
regulation;
|
|
·
|
developments
in patents or other intellectual property rights;
|
|
·
|
developments
in our relationships with customers and potential customers;
and
|
|
·
|
general
market conditions.
|
·
|
Pertain
to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately
and
fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of
the
company;
|
·
|
Provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary
to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management
and
directors of the company; and
|
·
|
Provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that
could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
|
·
|
We
will segregate incompatible functions using existing personnel where
possible or, given sufficient capital resources, we will hire additional
personnel to perform those functions.
|
·
|
We
will increase the oversight and review procedures of the board
of
directors with regard to financial reporting, financial reporting
processes and procedures and internal control
procedures.
|
·
|
To
the extent we can attract outside directors, we will nominate an
audit
committee to review and assist the board with its oversight
responsibilities.
|
·
|
We
will adopt a code of conduct and ethics
|
·
|
We
will remedy the deficiencies in communication between those executing
transactions and those who are responsible for accounting for such
transactions by adopting written procedures and implementing a
monitoring
mechanism to ensure that transactions are recorded
appropriately
|
·
|
We
will remedy the deficiencies in reconciliation and disposition
of
reconciling items related to shares issued and
outstanding.
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Principal
Occupation
|
|
Served
as
Director
Since
|
Richard
Salvador
|
|
79
|
|
President,
Chief Executive Officer, Director
|
|
1999
|
William
Garland
|
|
61
|
|
Chief
Operating Officer, Director
|
|
2007
|
Martin
Murray
|
|
41
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary, Director
|
|
1999
|
Michael
Strage
|
|
48
|
|
Vice
President Business Development, Director
|
|
1999
|
Name
and
Principal
Position
(a)
|
Year
(b)
|
Salary
($)
(c)
|
Bonus
($)
(d)
|
Stock
Awards
($)
(e)
|
Option
Awards
($)
(f)
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation ($)
(g)
|
Non-Qualified
Deferred Compen-sation Earnings ($)
(h)
|
All
other Compen-sation
($)
(i)
|
Total
($)
(j)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Richard
Salvador
Pres.
& CEO, Dir.
|
2007
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|||||||||||||||||||
2006
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
29,644
|
* |
0
|
0
|
0
|
29,644
|
Option
Awards
|
Stock
Awards
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
Number
of
Shares
or
Units of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
|
Market
Value
of
Shares
or
Units
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units
or
Other
Rights
That
Have
Not
Vested
(#)
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
or
Payout
Value
of
Unearned
Shares
Units
or
Other
Rights
That
Have
Not
Vested
($)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
(d)
|
(e)
|
(f)
|
(g)
|
(h)
|
(i)
|
(j)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Salvador
|
90,000
|
-
|
-
|
$
|
1.50
|
5/31/2010
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
200,000
|
-
|
-
|
$
|
1.00
|
1/1/2012
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
120,000
|
-
|
-
|
$
|
0.01
|
7/31/2015
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
Name
|
|
Fees
Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)
|
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
|
Option
Awards
($)
|
|
Non-Equity
incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
|
|
Change
in
Pension
Vslue
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
|
|
All
other
Compensation
($)
|
|
Total
($)
|
||||||||
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
(d)
|
(e)
|
(f)
|
(g)
|
(h)
|
|||||||||||||||
Gould
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|||||||||||||||
Murray
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|||||||||||||||
Strage
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Name
and, as Appropriate, Address
of Beneficial Owner (1)
|
Amount
and Nature of
Beneficial
Owner
|
Percent
of
Common
Stock
|
|||||
Michael
Strage (2)
|
3,375,639
|
15.59
|
%
|
||||
Richard
Salvador(3)
|
2,273,364
|
10.32
|
%
|
||||
William
Garland (4)
|
1,070,000
|
4.97
|
%
|
||||
Martin
Murray (6)
|
189,000
|
*
|
|||||
All
directors and executive officers (six persons) as a group
|
29.83
|
%
|
|||||
Atypical
BioVentures Fund LLC (9)
c/o
Aurora Capital LLC
200
Park Avenue South, Suite 1301
New
York, NY 10003
|
3,652,505
|
14.78
|
%
|
(1)
|
Unless
otherwise indicated, the address of each of the listed beneficial
owners
identified above is c/o 425
Madison Avenue, Suite 902, New York, New York 10017.
|
(2)
|
Michael
Strage. Includes 2,773,014 shares held by Mr. Strage, 200,000 options
exercisable at $1.65 per share, 100,000 options exercisable at $1.10
per
share, 120,000 options exercisable at $0.01 per share, and warrants
to
purchase 182,625 shares exercisable at $0.15 per
share.
|
(3)
|
Richard
Salvador. Includes 1,275,488 shares held by Mr. Salvador, 32,000
shares
held by his wife, a warrant to purchase 8,000 shares at $6.00 per
share
held by Dick Salvador’s wife, 90,000 options exercisable at $1.50 per
share, 200,000 options exercisable at $1.00 per share and 120,000
options
exercisable at $0.01 per share and 547,876 warrants exercisable at
$0.15
per share.
|
(4)
|
William
Garland. Includes 600,000 shares held by Mr. Garland, 30,000 options
exercisable at $3.00 per share, 200,000 options exercisable at $1.00
per
share, 240,000 exercisable at $0.01 per
share.
|
(5)
|
George
Gould. Includes 396,517 shares held by Mr. Gould, 90,000 options
exercisable at $1.50 per share, 50,000 options exercisable at $1.00
per
share, 20,000 options exercisable at $0.01 per share, and 182,625
warrants
exercisable at $0.15 per share.
|
(6)
|
Martin
Murray. Includes 129,000 shares held by Mr. Murray, 45,000 options
exercisable at $1.50 per share, 5,000 options exercisable at $1.00
per
share, and 10,000 options exercisable at $0.01 per
share.
|
(7)
|
Atypical
BioVentures Fund LLC. Includes 3,652,505 warrants exercisable at
$0.15 per
share.
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
||||||
Plan
Category
|
Number
of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options,
warrants
and rights.
|
|
Weighted-average
exercise price of outstanding options, warrants, and
rights
|
|
Number
of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity
compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column
(a))
|
|||||
Equity
compensation plan approved by security holders (1)
|
2,000,000
|
$
|
0.77
|
0
|
||||||
Equity
compensation plan approved by security holders (2)
|
90,000
|
$
|
0.01
|
4,910,000
|
||||||
Total
|
2,090,000
|
$
|
0.77
|
4,910,000
|
(1)
|
The
AngioGenex 2000 Stock Option Plan had 2,000,000 shares of common
stock
reserved for issuance under the Plan under which the board of directors
may grant incentive or non-statutory stock options to officers, directors,
employees, consultants and advisors of
AngioGenex.
|
(2)
|
The
AngioGenex 2004 Stock Option Plan has 5,000,000 shares of common
stock
reserved for issuance under the Plan under which the board of directors
may grant incentive or non-statutory stock options to officers, directors,
employees, consultants and advisors of
AngioGenex.
|
Amount
Invested
|
Shares
|
Warrants
|
||||||||
Michael
Strage
|
$
|
25,000
|
202,011
|
182,625
|
||||||
Richard
Salvador
|
$
|
75,000
|
605,488
|
547,876
|
||||||
George
Gould
|
$
|
25,000
|
201,517
|
182,625
|
AngioGenex, Inc. | ||
|
|
|
By: | /s/ Richard Salvador | |
Richard
Salvador
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
/s/ Martin Murray | ||
Martin
Murray
Chief
Financial Officer
Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer
|
/s/
Richard Salvador
|
April
2, 2008
|
|
/s/
Michael M. Strage*
|
April
2, 2008
|
||
Richard
Salvador
|
Date
|
|
Michael
M. Strage
|
Date
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
/s/
Martin Murray
|
April
2, 2008
|
|
/s/
William Garland*
|
April
2, 2008
|
||
Martin
Murray
|
Date
|
|
William
Garland
|
Date
|
||
*By:
|
/s/ Martin
Murray
|
|
March
28, 2008
|
|
Martin
Murray
As
Attorney-in-Fact
|
|
|
Exhibits | Description of Document |
2.1
|
Acquisition
Agreement and Plan of Reorganization between AngioGenex, Inc. and
eClic,
Inc. dated December 1, 2005 (Incorporated by reference to the
corresponding exhibit to the Form 8-K previously filed by AngioGenex
on
December 30, 2005 (File No.
000-26181))
|
3.1
|
Amended
Articles of Incorporation dated December 30, 2005 (Incorporated by
reference to exhibit 3.4 to the Form 8-K previously filed by AngioGenex
on
December 30, 2005 (File No.
000-26181))
|
10.2
|
Exclusive
License Agreement between AngioGenex, Inc. and Sloan Kettering Institutes
for Cancer Research, dated April 3, 2000. (Incorporated by reference
to
the corresponding exhibit to the Form 8-K/A previously filed by AngioGenex
on January 9, 2006 (File No.
000-26181))
|
31.1
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive
Officer
|
31.2
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial
Officer
|
32
|
Section
1350 Certifications
|
ANGIOGENEX,
INC.
|
(FORMERLY
ECLIC, INC.)
|
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
|
BALANCE
SHEETS
|
December
31,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
ASSETS
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||
CURRENT ASSETS | |||||||
Cash
|
$
|
45,406
|
$
|
4,386
|
|||
Prepaid
offering costs
|
—
|
15,000
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
6,122
|
739
|
|||||
Receivable
|
50,000
|
—
|
|||||
TOTAL
CURRENT ASSETS
|
101,528
|
20,125
|
|||||
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT
|
|||||||
Equipment,
net of depreciation
|
1,190
|
1,810
|
|||||
TOTAL
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
|
1,190
|
1,810
|
|||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$
|
102,718
|
$
|
21,935
|
|||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
|||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
|||||||
Accrued
expenses
|
$
|
273,442
|
$
|
235,835
|
|||
Accrued
expenses - related parties
|
148,793
|
127,706
|
|||||
Notes
payable
|
11,000
|
1,000
|
|||||
Notes
payable, related parties
|
35,000
|
35,000
|
|||||
Accrued
interest
|
4,859
|
2,629
|
|||||
TOTAL
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
473,094
|
402,170
|
|||||
LONG-TERM
LIABILITIES
|
|||||||
Settlement
payable
|
35,000
|
—
|
|||||
35,000
|
—
|
||||||
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
|||||||
STOCKHOLDERS'
DEFICIT
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock, 5,000,000 shares authorized, $0.001 par value;
|
|||||||
no
shares issued and outstanding
|
—
|
—
|
|||||
Common
stock, 70,000,000 shares authorized, $0.001 par value;
|
|||||||
21,053,406
and 20,347,285 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
|
21,053
|
20,347
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
2,770,675
|
2,448,888
|
|||||
Stock
options, warrants, and beneficial conversion rights
|
912,379
|
895,608
|
|||||
Accumulated
deficit during development stage
|
(4,109,483
|
)
|
(3,745,078
|
)
|
|||
TOTAL
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
(405,376
|
)
|
(380,235
|
)
|
|||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
$
|
102,718
|
$
|
21,935
|
|||
ANGIOGENEX,
INC
|
(FORMERLY
ECLIC, INC.)
|
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
|
STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS
|
March
, 1999
|
||||||||||
Year
Ended
|
(Inception)
to
|
|||||||||
December
31,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
||||||||
REVENUES
|
$
|
50,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
50,000
|
||||
EXPENSES
|
||||||||||
Research
and development
|
64,834
|
64,974
|
1,667,815
|
|||||||
Consulting
|
—
|
—
|
109,666
|
|||||||
Licenses
and fees
|
—
|
—
|
155,000
|
|||||||
Professional
fees
|
228,260
|
210,446
|
1,376,872
|
|||||||
General
and administrative
|
52,836
|
25,990
|
272,871
|
|||||||
TOTAL
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
345,930
|
301,410
|
3,582,224
|
|||||||
LOSS
FROM OPERATIONS
|
(295,930
|
)
|
(301,410
|
)
|
(3,532,224
|
)
|
||||
OTHER
INCOME (EXPENSES)
|
||||||||||
Other
income
|
—
|
—
|
464,688
|
|||||||
Interest
income
|
—
|
—
|
7,236
|
|||||||
Finance
costs
|
(68,475
|
)
|
(41,728
|
)
|
(1,049,183
|
)
|
||||
TOTAL
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES)
|
(68,475
|
)
|
(41,728
|
)
|
(577,259
|
)
|
||||
LOSS
BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
(364,405
|
)
|
(343,138
|
)
|
(4,109,483
|
)
|
||||
INCOME
TAXES
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||
NET
LOSS
|
$
|
(364,405
|
)
|
$
|
(343,138
|
)
|
$
|
(4,109,483
|
)
|
|
NET
LOSS PER COMMON SHARE,
|
||||||||||
BASIC
AND DILUTED
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
||||
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE NUMBER OF
|
||||||||||
COMMON
STOCK SHARES OUTSTANDING,
|
||||||||||
BASIC
AND DILUTED
|
20,673,474
|
14,409,084
|
||||||||
ANGIOGENEX,
INC.
|
(FORMERLY
ECLIC, INC.)
|
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
|
STATEMENT
OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(DEFICIT)
|
Deficit
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Common
Stock
|
Stock
options /
|
Accumulated
|
|||||||||||||||||
Warrants
/
|
During
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||
Number
|
Additional
|
Beneficial
|
Development
|
Stockholders'
|
|||||||||||||||
of
Shares
|
Amount
|
Paid-in
Capital
|
conversion
|
Stage
|
Equity
(Deficit)
|
||||||||||||||
Issuance
of founders' common stock at $0.01 per share
|
8,100,000
|
$
|
8,100
|
$
|
900
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
9,000
|
||||||||
Issuance
of common stock at $0.17 per share
|
729,000
|
729
|
120,271
|
—
|
—
|
121,000
|
|||||||||||||
Net
Loss for the year ended March 31, 2000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(104,357
|
)
|
(104,357
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Balance,
March 31, 2000
|
8,829,000
|
8,829
|
121,171
|
—
|
(104,357
|
)
|
25,643
|
||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock at $0.17 per share
|
171,000
|
171
|
28,829
|
—
|
—
|
29,000
|
|||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock and warrants (net of cash and
|
|||||||||||||||||||
non
cash expenses of $146,000) at $12,500 per unit
|
144,000
|
144
|
347,856
|
—
|
—
|
348,000
|
|||||||||||||
Stock
options vested
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
22,845
|
—
|
22,845
|
|||||||||||||
Net
loss for the year ended March 31, 2001
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(181,811
|
)
|
(181,811
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Balance
March 31, 2001
|
9,144,000
|
9,144
|
497,856
|
22,845
|
(286,168
|
)
|
243,677
|
||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock and warrants (net of cash and
|
|||||||||||||||||||
non
cash expenses of $118,000) at $12,500 per unit
|
62,000
|
62
|
75,149
|
—
|
—
|
75,211
|
|||||||||||||
Stock
options vested
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
82,875
|
—
|
82,875
|
|||||||||||||
Net
loss for the year ended March 31, 2002
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(482,903
|
)
|
(482,903
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Balance
March 31, 2002
|
9,206,000
|
9,206
|
573,005
|
105,720
|
(769,071
|
)
|
(81,140
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock for services at $0.25 per share
|
510,000
|
510
|
124,490
|
—
|
—
|
125,000
|
|||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock at $0.25 per share (net of
|
|||||||||||||||||||
cash
and non cash expenses of $14,989)
|
216,000
|
216
|
38,795
|
—
|
—
|
39,011
|
|||||||||||||
Stock
options vested
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
74,280
|
—
|
74,280
|
|||||||||||||
Net
loss for the year ended March 31, 2003
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(469,897
|
)
|
(469,897
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Balance,
March 31, 2003
|
9,932,000
|
9,932
|
736,290
|
180,000
|
(1,238,968
|
)
|
(312,746
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock for services at $0.25 per share
|
1,255,000
|
1,255
|
312,495
|
—
|
—
|
313,750
|
|||||||||||||
Private
placement costs from prior year offering
|
—
|
—
|
(2,300
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
(2,300
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Stock
options vested
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
35,653
|
—
|
35,653
|
|||||||||||||
Issuance
of warrants attached to convertible bridge loan
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
586,551
|
—
|
586,551
|
|||||||||||||
Beneficial
conversion rights of convertible bridge loan
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
288,449
|
—
|
288,449
|
|||||||||||||
Net
loss for the year ended March 31, 2004
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(356,061
|
)
|
(356,061
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Balance,
March 31, 2004
|
11,187,000
|
11,187
|
1,046,485
|
1,090,653
|
(1,595,029
|
)
|
553,296
|
||||||||||||
Stock
options vested
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
21,614
|
—
|
21,614
|
|||||||||||||
Net
loss for the year ended March 31, 2005
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(1,396,914
|
)
|
(1,396,914
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Balance,
March 31, 2005
|
11,187,000
|
11,187
|
1,046,485
|
1,112,267
|
(2,991,943
|
)
|
(822,004
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Stock
options granted for prepaid offering costs
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
14,822
|
—
|
14,822
|
|||||||||||||
Stock
options vested
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
36,954
|
—
|
36,954
|
|||||||||||||
Common
stock issued in recapitalization and
|
|||||||||||||||||||
reverse
merger
|
1,500,000
|
1,500
|
(1,500
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||
Net
loss for the nine months ended December 31, 2005
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(409,997
|
)
|
(409,997
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2005
|
12,687,000
|
$
|
12,687
|
$
|
1,044,985
|
$
|
1,164,043
|
$
|
(3,401,940
|
)
|
$
|
(1,180,225
|
)
|
||||||
ANGIOGENEX,
INC.
|
(FORMERLY
ECLIC, INC.)
|
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
|
STATEMENT
OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(DEFICIT)
|
Deficit
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Common
Stock
|
Stock
options /
|
Accumulated
|
|||||||||||||||||
Warrants
/
|
During
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||
Number
|
Additional
|
Beneficial
|
Development
|
Stockholders'
|
|||||||||||||||
of
Shares
|
Amount
|
Paid-in
Capital
|
conversion
|
Stage
|
Equity
(Deficit)
|
||||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2005
|
12,687,000
|
$
|
12,687
|
$
|
1,044,985
|
$
|
1,164,043
|
$
|
(3,401,940
|
)
|
$
|
(1,180,225
|
)
|
||||||
Issuance
of common stock at $0.25 per share
|
310,000
|
310
|
77,190
|
—
|
—
|
77,500
|
|||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock at $0.33 per share
|
300,000
|
300
|
80,200
|
19,500
|
—
|
100,000
|
|||||||||||||
Stock
options vested
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
514
|
—
|
514
|
|||||||||||||
Shares
issued in connection to converstion of notes payable
|
7,050,285
|
7050
|
1,246,513
|
(288,449
|
)
|
—
|
965,114
|
||||||||||||
Net
loss for the year ended December 31, 2006
|
(343,138
|
)
|
(343,138
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2006
|
20,347,285
|
20,347
|
2,448,888
|
895,608
|
(3,745,078
|
)
|
(380,235
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock at $0.50 per share
|
78,000
|
78
|
17,266
|
13,086
|
—
|
30,430
|
|||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock for services at $0.45 per share
|
200,000
|
200
|
89,800
|
—
|
—
|
90,000
|
|||||||||||||
Shares
issued in connection to converstion of notes payable
|
242,859
|
243
|
145,471
|
—
|
—
|
145,714
|
|||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock at $0.65 per share
|
16,000
|
16
|
3,059
|
3,685
|
—
|
6,760
|
|||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock at $0.50 per share
|
169,262
|
169
|
84,191
|
84,360
|
|||||||||||||||
Amortized
private placement costs
|
—
|
—
|
(18,000
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
(18,000
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Net
loss for the year ended December 31, 2007
|
(364,405
|
)
|
(364,405
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2007
|
21,053,406
|
$
|
21,053
|
$
|
2,770,675
|
$
|
912,379
|
$
|
(4,109,483
|
)
|
$
|
(405,376
|
)
|
||||||
ANGIOGENEX,
INC.
|
(FORMERLY
ECLIC, INC.)
|
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
|
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
|
Period
from
|
||||||||||
March,
1999
|
||||||||||
Year
Ended
|
(Inception)
to
|
|||||||||
December
31,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
||||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(364,405
|
)
|
$
|
(343,138
|
)
|
$
|
(4,109,483
|
)
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss
|
||||||||||
to
net cash used by operating activities:
|
||||||||||
Depreciation
|
620
|
27
|
6,659
|
|||||||
Services
paid by issuance of common stock
|
90,000
|
—
|
526,450
|
|||||||
Services
paid by issuance of common stock options
|
—
|
514
|
289,557
|
|||||||
Amortization
of warrants and beneficial conversion
|
54,429
|
19,500
|
948,929
|
|||||||
Non
cash financing charges
|
6,285
|
—
|
6,285
|
|||||||
(Increase)
decrease in prepaid expenses
|
(5,383
|
)
|
(510
|
)
|
(6,122
|
)
|
||||
(Increase)
decrease in prepaid offering costs
|
15,000
|
51,178
|
—
|
|||||||
(Increase)
decrease in receivables
|
(50,000
|
)
|
—
|
(50,000
|
)
|
|||||
Increase
(decrease) in accrued expenses
|
37,607
|
23,690
|
272,020
|
|||||||
Increase
(decrease) in accrued expenses, related party
|
21,087
|
52,647
|
150,215
|
|||||||
Increase
(decrease) in accrued interest
|
2,230
|
39,842
|
94,973
|
|||||||
Increase
(decrease) in settlement payable
|
35,000
|
—
|
35,000
|
|||||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(157,530
|
)
|
(156,250
|
)
|
(1,835,517
|
)
|
||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||
Purchase
of equipment
|
—
|
—
|
(7,849
|
)
|
||||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
—
|
—
|
(7,849
|
)
|
||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||
Proceeds
from bridge loan
|
—
|
—
|
875,000
|
|||||||
Payment
of notes payable - related party
|
—
|
—
|
(25,000
|
)
|
||||||
Payment
of notes payable
|
—
|
—
|
(35,000
|
)
|
||||||
Proceeds
from notes payable
|
95,000
|
—
|
191,000
|
|||||||
Issuance
of stock for cash - net
|
103,550
|
158,000
|
882,772
|
|||||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
198,550
|
158,000
|
1,888,772
|
|||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash
|
41,020
|
1,750
|
45,406
|
|||||||
Cash,
beginning of period
|
4,386
|
2,636
|
—
|
|||||||
Cash,
end of period
|
$
|
45,406
|
$
|
4,386
|
$
|
45,406
|
||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES:
|
||||||||||
Cash
paid for interest and income taxes:
|
||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
||||
Income
taxes
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
||||
NON-CASH
INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||
Services
paid by issuance of stock
|
$
|
90,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
526,450
|
||||
Services
paid by issuance of stock options
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
514
|
$
|
274,735
|
||||
Offering
costs paid by issuance of stock options
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
14,822
|
||||
Conversion
of debt to equity
|
$
|
85,000
|
$
|
875,000
|
$
|
960,000
|
||||
December
31,
2007
|
December
31,
2006
|
||||||
Operating
Loss
|
$
|
353,000
|
$
|
301,000
|
|||
Permanent
Differences:
|
|||||||
Nondeductible
meals and entertainment
|
1,000
|
2,000
|
|||||
Temporary
Differences:
|
|||||||
Stock
options issued under a non-qualified plan:
|
—
|
1,000
|
|||||
Financing
costs
|
61,000
|
15,000
|
|||||
Deferred
research and development costs:
|
9,000
|
15,000
|
|||||
Operating
loss after permanent and temporary differences
|
$
|
282,000
|
$
|
268,000
|
|||
Accumulated
Net Operating Loss Carryforward
|
$
|
1,906,000
|
$
|
1,573,000
|
|||
Other
accumulated temporary differences
|
2,149,000
|
2,085,000
|
|||||
Accumulated
net operating loss carryforward after all temporary and permanent
differences
|
$
|
4,055,000
|
$
|
3,658,000
|
|||
Research
and development tax credit
|
$
|
85,000
|
$
|
82,000
|
|||
Deferred
tax asset
|
$
|
1,707,000
|
$
|
1,509,000
|
|||
Deferred
tax asset valuation allowance
|
(1,707,000
|
)
|
(1,509,000
|
)
|
|||
Net
deferred tax asset
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
|
December
31,
2007
|
December
31,
2006
|
From
April 1999
(Inception)
to
December
31, 2007
|
|||||||
Net
loss
|
||||||||||
As
reported
|
$
|
353,234
|
$
|
343,138
|
$
|
4,098,312
|
||||
Pro
forma
|
$
|
353,234
|
$
|
343,138
|
$
|
5,395,418
|
Shares
Under Options
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
||||||
Options
at April 1, 2005
|
1,385,000
|
$
|
1.34
|
||||
Options
issued (2001 Plan)
|
615,000
|
0.01
|
|||||
Options
issued (2004 Plan)
|
90,000
|
0.01
|
|||||
Options
at December 31, 2005
|
2,090,000
|
$
|
0.77
|
||||
Options
exercisable at December 31, 2005
|
2,085,000
|
$
|
0.77
|
||||
Weighted
average fair value of options
granted at December 31, 2005
|
$
|
0.25
|
|||||
Options
at December 31, 2005
|
2,090,000
|
$
|
0.77
|
||||
Options
issued (2004 Plan)
|
—
|
—
|
|||||
Options
at December 31, 2006
|
2,090,000
|
$
|
0.77
|
Options
exercisable at December 31, 2006
|
2,090,000
|
$
|
0.77
|
||||
Weighted
average fair value of options
granted at December 31, 2006
|
$
|
0.25
|
Options
at December 31, 2006
|
2,090,000
|
$
|
0.77
|
||||
Options
issued (2004 Plan)
|
—
|
—
|
|||||
Options
at December 31, 2007
|
2,090,000
|
$
|
0.77
|
Options
exercisable at December 31, 2007
|
2,090,000
|
$
|
0.77
|
||||
Weighted
average fair value of options
granted at December 31, 2007
|
$
|
0.25
|
Total
compensation costs related to non-vested stock options as of
December 31,
2006
|
$
|
514
|
||
Weighted
average period of nonvested stock options as of December 31,
2007
|
0
months
|