(Mark One) | ||
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
New York | 11-3289165 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
75 Maxess Road, Melville, New York | 11747 | |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer x | Accelerated Filer o | Non-Accelerated Filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x
As of June 29, 2010, 44,607,453 shares of Class A common stock and 18,125,474 shares of Class B common stock of the registrant were outstanding.
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the Report) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Discussions containing such forward-looking statements may be found in Items 2 and 3 of Part I of this Report, as well as within this Report generally. The words believes, anticipates, thinks, expects, estimates, plans, intends, and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. In addition, any statements which refer to expectations, projections or other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly disclose any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring subsequent to filing this Report with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation, those discussed in this section and Items 2 and 3 of Part I, as well as in Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors of this Report, and in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors and in Part II, Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 29, 2009. In addition, new risks emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors or to assess the impact of such risk factors on our business. Accordingly, future results may differ materially from historical results or from those discussed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, the reader should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:
| current economic, political, and social conditions; |
| general economic conditions in the markets in which the Company operates; |
| changing customer and product mixes; |
| competition; |
| industry consolidation and other changes in the industrial distribution sector; |
| volatility in commodity and energy prices; |
| the outcome of potential government or regulatory proceedings or future litigation; |
| credit risk of our customers; |
| risk of cancellation or rescheduling of orders; |
| work stoppages or other business interruptions (including those due to extreme weather conditions) at transportation centers or shipping ports; |
| dependence on our information systems; and |
| retention of key personnel. |
i
ii
May 29, 2010 |
August 29, 2009 |
|||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current Assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 167,900 | $ | 225,572 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $5,097 and $5,863, respectively | 212,873 | 165,368 | ||||||
Inventories | 266,066 | 246,649 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 18,729 | 17,169 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes | 26,313 | 27,956 | ||||||
Total current assets | 691,881 | 682,714 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net | 139,697 | 131,885 | ||||||
Goodwill | 271,765 | 271,765 | ||||||
Identifiable intangibles, net | 50,520 | 55,766 | ||||||
Other assets | 7,157 | 15,417 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 1,161,020 | $ | 1,157,547 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current Liabilities: |
||||||||
Revolving credit notes | $ | | $ | 95,000 | ||||
Current maturities of long-term notes payable | 59,858 | 59,105 | ||||||
Accounts payable | 75,470 | 55,345 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities | 56,498 | 46,388 | ||||||
Total current liabilities | 191,826 | 255,838 | ||||||
Long-term notes payable | 47 | 39,365 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes and tax uncertainties | 60,280 | 56,808 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 252,153 | 352,011 | ||||||
Commitments and Contingencies |
||||||||
Shareholders Equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock; $0.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding | | | ||||||
Class A common stock (one vote per share); $0.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 48,147,830 and 46,868,631 shares issued, and 45,509,846 and 44,247,972 shares outstanding, respectively | 48 | 47 | ||||||
Class B common stock (ten votes per share); $0.001 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 18,125,474 and 18,389,874 shares issued and outstanding, respectively | 18 | 18 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 373,631 | 336,092 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 645,713 | 577,321 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (3,379 | ) | (2,068 | ) | ||||
Class A treasury stock, at cost, 2,637,984 and 2,620,659 shares, respectively | (107,164 | ) | (105,874 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders equity | 908,867 | 805,536 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity | $ | 1,161,020 | $ | 1,157,547 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||||
May 29, 2010 |
May 30, 2009 |
May 29, 2010 |
May 30, 2009 |
|||||||||||||
Net sales | $ | 450,381 | $ | 350,489 | $ | 1,230,680 | $ | 1,135,421 | ||||||||
Cost of goods sold | 245,499 | 189,470 | 671,064 | 606,529 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit | 204,882 | 161,019 | 559,616 | 528,892 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses | 134,481 | 115,778 | 388,303 | 365,981 | ||||||||||||
Income from operations | 70,401 | 45,241 | 171,313 | 162,911 | ||||||||||||
Other (Expense) Income: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | (248 | ) | (544 | ) | (993 | ) | (3,212 | ) | ||||||||
Interest income | 43 | 164 | 137 | 710 | ||||||||||||
Other income, net | 19 | 65 | 31 | 44 | ||||||||||||
Total other expense | (186 | ) | (315 | ) | (825 | ) | (2,458 | ) | ||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes | 70,215 | 44,926 | 170,488 | 160,453 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 25,968 | 17,171 | 64,172 | 61,325 | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 44,247 | $ | 27,755 | $ | 106,316 | $ | 99,128 | ||||||||
Per Share Information: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.70 | $ | 0.45 | $ | 1.69 | $ | 1.59 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.69 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 1.67 | $ | 1.58 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares used in computing net income per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic | 62,790 | 61,838 | 62,509 | 61,710 | ||||||||||||
Diluted | 63,320 | 62,352 | 63,025 | 62,294 | ||||||||||||
Cash dividend declared per common share | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.20 | $ | 0.60 | $ | 0.60 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
Class A Common Stock |
Class B Common Stock |
Additional Paid-In Capital |
Retained Earnings |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
Class A Treasury Stock |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount at Cost | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at August 29, 2009. | 46,869 | $ | 47 | 18,390 | $ | 18 | $ | 336,092 | $ | 577,321 | $ | (2,068 | ) | 2,621 | $ | (105,874 | ) | $ | 805,536 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Exchange of Class B common stock for Class A common stock | 265 | | (265 | ) | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of common stock options, including income tax benefits of $5,390 | 842 | 1 | | | 27,245 | | | | | 27,246 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued under associate stock purchase plan | | | | | 185 | | | (46 | ) | 1,776 | 1,961 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grant of restricted common stock, net of cancellations | 172 | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation. | | | | | 10,109 | | | | | 10,109 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock | | | | | | | | 63 | (3,066 | ) | (3,066 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends paid on Class A common stock | | | | | | (26,916 | ) | | | | (26,916 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends paid on Class B common stock | | | | | | (11,008 | ) | | | | (11,008 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative translation adjustment | | | | | | | (1,311 | ) | | | (1,311 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | | | | | | 106,316 | | | | 106,316 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income | 105,005 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at May 29, 2010 | 48,148 | $ | 48 | 18,125 | $ | 18 | $ | 373,631 | $ | 645,713 | $ | (3,379 | ) | 2,638 | $ | (107,164 | ) | $ | 908,867 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended | ||||||||
May 29, 2010 |
May 30, 2009 |
|||||||
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
||||||||
Net income | $ | 106,316 | $ | 99,128 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 19,250 | 20,075 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation | 10,109 | 7,800 | ||||||
Loss on disposal of property, plant, and equipment | 16 | | ||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts | 1,029 | 3,574 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes and tax uncertainties | 5,115 | 4,630 | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation | (4,531 | ) | (1,575 | ) | ||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable | (49,386 | ) | 51,869 | |||||
Inventories | (20,311 | ) | 58,389 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | (1,632 | ) | 3,232 | |||||
Other assets | 7,829 | 7,734 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 35,459 | (15,735 | ) | |||||
Total adjustments | 2,947 | 139,993 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 109,263 | 239,121 | ||||||
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
||||||||
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment | (21,516 | ) | (18,048 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment | | 448 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (21,516 | ) | (17,600 | ) | ||||
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
||||||||
Purchases of treasury stock | (2,211 | ) | (1,200 | ) | ||||
Payment of cash dividends | (37,924 | ) | (37,355 | ) | ||||
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation | 4,531 | 1,575 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of Class A common stock in connection with associate stock purchase plan | 1,961 | 2,096 | ||||||
Proceeds from exercise of Class A common stock options | 21,856 | 5,761 | ||||||
Borrowings under the revolving credit line commitment from credit facility | | 4,000 | ||||||
Paydown of the revolving credit line commitment from credit facility | (95,000 | ) | | |||||
Repayments of notes payable under the credit facility and other notes | (38,565 | ) | (30,875 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (145,352 | ) | (55,998 | ) | ||||
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | (67 | ) | (174 | ) | ||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (57,672 | ) | 165,349 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period | 225,572 | 42,843 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents end of period | $ | 167,900 | $ | 208,192 | ||||
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: |
||||||||
Cash paid for income taxes | $ | 53,771 | $ | 43,652 | ||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | 918 | $ | 3,685 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. (MSC) and all of its subsidiaries (hereinafter referred to collectively as the Company). All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) have been included. Operating results for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended May 29, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending August 28, 2010. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 29, 2009.
The Companys fiscal year ends on a Saturday close to August 31 of each year.
In June 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued amendments to Accounting Standards CodificationTM (ASC) Topic 260, Earnings Per Share (ASC 260). At the beginning of its 2010 fiscal year, the Company adopted the new authoritative guidance of ASC 260. The Companys non-vested share-based compensation awards contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends and meet the criteria of a participating security as defined by ASC 260. Under the two-class method, net income per share is computed by dividing net income allocated to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. In applying the two-class method, net income is allocated to both common stock shares and participating securities based on their respective weighted average shares outstanding for the period. Prior period net income per share data presented has been adjusted retrospectively.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per common share under the two-class method:
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||||
May 29, 2010 |
May 30, 2009 |
May 29, 2010 |
May 30, 2009 |
|||||||||||||
Net income as reported | $ | 44,247 | $ | 27,755 | $ | 106,316 | $ | 99,128 | ||||||||
Less: Distributed net income available to participating securities | (101 | ) | (90 | ) | (304 | ) | (277 | ) | ||||||||
Less: Undistributed net income available to participating securities | (305 | ) | (136 | ) | (670 | ) | (561 | ) | ||||||||
Numerator for basic net income per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Undistributed and distributed net income available to common shareholders | $ | 43,841 | $ | 27,529 | $ | 105,342 | $ | 98,290 | ||||||||
Add: Undistributed net income allocated to participating securities | 305 | 136 | 670 | 561 | ||||||||||||
Less: Undistributed net income reallocated to participating securities | (302 | ) | (135 | ) | (665 | ) | (556 | ) | ||||||||
Numerator for diluted net income per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Undistributed and distributed net income available to common shareholders | $ | 43,844 | $ | 27,530 | $ | 105,347 | $ | 98,295 |
5
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||||
May 29, 2010 |
May 30, 2009 |
May 29, 2010 |
May 30, 2009 |
|||||||||||||
Denominator: |
||||||||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding for basic net income per share | 62,790 | 61,838 | 62,509 | 61,710 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities | 530 | 514 | 516 | 584 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding for diluted net income per share | 63,320 | 62,352 | 63,025 | 62,294 | ||||||||||||
Net income per share Two-class method: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.70 | $ | 0.45 | $ | 1.69 | $ | 1.59 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.69 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 1.67 | $ | 1.58 |
Antidilutive stock options (0 and 1,715 shares at May 29, 2010 and May 30, 2009, respectively) were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share.
The Company accounts for all share-based payments in accordance with ASC Topic 718, Compensation Stock Compensation (ASC 718). The stock-based compensation expense related to the stock option plans and the Associate Stock Purchase Plan included in operating expenses was $1,468 and $1,249 for the thirteen week periods ended May 29, 2010 and May 30, 2009, respectively, and $4,645 and $4,059 for the thirty-nine week periods ended May 29, 2010 and May 30, 2009, respectively. Tax benefits related to these expenses for the thirteen week periods ended May 29, 2010 and May 30, 2009, were $541 and $471, respectively, and for the thirty-nine week periods ended May 29, 2010 and May 30, 2009, were $1,709 and $1,477, respectively.
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:
Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended | ||||||||
May 29, 2010 |
May 30, 2009 |
|||||||
Expected life (in years) | 4.8 | 4.8 | ||||||
Risk-free interest rate | 2.18 | % | 2.72 | % | ||||
Expected volatility | 35.2 | % | 30.3 | % | ||||
Expected dividend yield | 1.70 | % | 1.40 | % |
6
A summary of the activity of the Companys stock option plans for the thirty-nine weeks ended May 29, 2010 is as follows:
Options | Weighted- Average Exercise Price per Share | Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (In Years) |
Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
|||||||||||||
Outstanding on August 29, 2009 | 2,759 | $ | 33.65 | |||||||||||||
Granted | 515 | 44.17 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised | (842 | ) | 25.94 | |||||||||||||
Canceled | (2 | ) | 14.45 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding on May 29, 2010 | 2,430 | $ | 38.57 | 4.26 | $ | 32,002 | ||||||||||
Exercisable on May 29, 2010 | 1,209 | $ | 34.17 | 3.07 | $ | 21,246 |
The weighted-average grant-date fair values of the stock options granted for the thirty-nine week periods ended May 29, 2010 and May 30, 2009 were $12.49 and $10.05, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the thirty-nine week periods ended May 29, 2010 and May 30, 2009 were $21,344 and $6,482, respectively. The unrecognized share-based compensation cost related to stock option expense at May 29, 2010 was $10,736 and will be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.51 years.
A summary of the activity of the share-based compensation awards granted under the Companys 1995 Restricted Stock Plan and 2005 Omnibus Equity Plan (the Plans) for the thirty-nine weeks ended May 29, 2010 is as follows:
Shares | Weighted- Average Grant-Date Fair Value |
|||||||
Non-vested at August 29, 2009 | 558 | $ | 41.47 | |||||
Granted | 185 | 44.34 | ||||||
Vested | (128 | ) | 41.56 | |||||
Canceled | (13 | ) | 41.97 | |||||
Non-vested at May 29, 2010 | 602 | $ | 42.60 |
Stock-based compensation expense recognized for the share-based compensation awards was $1,860 and $1,291 for the thirteen week periods ended May 29, 2010 and May 30, 2009, respectively, and $5,464 and $3,741 for the thirty-nine week periods ended May 29, 2010 and May 30, 2009, respectively. The unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation awards granted under the Plans at May 29, 2010 was $15,119 and will be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.23 years.
7
The Company complies with the provisions of ASC Topic 220, Comprehensive Income (ASC 220) which establishes standards for the reporting of comprehensive income and its components. The components of comprehensive income, net of tax are as follows:
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||||
May 29, 2010 |
May 30, 2009 |
May 29, 2010 |
May 30, 2009 |
|||||||||||||
Net income as reported: | $ | 44,247 | $ | 27,755 | $ | 106,316 | $ | 99,128 | ||||||||
Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment | (502 | ) | 1,445 | (1,311 | ) | (1,540 | ) | |||||||||
Comprehensive income | $ | 43,745 | $ | 29,200 | $ | 105,005 | $ | 97,588 |
Fair value accounting standards define fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The following fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three levels, with Level 1 being of the highest priority. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:
Level 1 Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
Level 2 Include other inputs that are directly or indirectly observable in the marketplace.
Level 3 Unobservable inputs which are supported by little or no market activity.
As of May 29, 2010 and August 29, 2009, the Company measured cash equivalents consisting of money market funds at fair value on a recurring basis for which market prices are readily available (Level 1) and that invest primarily in United States government and government agency securities and municipal bond securities, which aggregated $141,127 and $198,702, respectively.
The Companys financial instruments, other than those presented in the disclosure above, include cash, receivables, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and short-term and long-term debt. Substantially all of the Companys long-term debt accrues interest at a floating rate, which reprices frequently. Management believes the carrying amount of the aforementioned financial instruments is a reasonable estimate of fair value as of May 29, 2010 and August 29, 2009 due to the short-term maturity of these items or variable interest rate.
On August 30, 2009, the Company adopted the remaining provisions of ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820) for all non-financial assets and liabilities measured on a non-recurring basis. During the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended May 29, 2010, the Company had no significant measurements of non-financial assets or liabilities at fair value on a non-recurring basis subsequent to their initial recognition.
The Company has an unsecured credit facility that consists of a revolving credit line commitment and term loan facility (the Credit Facility) which expires on June 8, 2011. The Companys revolving credit line commitment is $150,000, of which $0 and $95,000 were outstanding at May 29, 2010 and August 29, 2009, respectively. The Company paid down its $95,000 outstanding balance in April 2010. The interest rate payable for any borrowings under the revolving loans is currently 40 basis points over LIBOR rates. The weighted average borrowing rate in effect for the revolving loans at August 29, 2009 was 0.69%. The Company is also charged a fee of 10 basis points on the borrowed and unborrowed balances of the revolving loans.
8
At May 29, 2010 and August 29, 2009, the Company had term loan borrowings outstanding under its term loan facility of $59,687 and $98,125, respectively. At May 29, 2010, principal payments consist of quarterly installments of $20,500 in each of the next two quarters commencing in June 2010, and a final payment of approximately $18,687 due in December 2010. Optional prepayments may be made at any time, or from time to time, in whole or part, without premium or penalty. The interest rate payable for borrowings under the term loan facility is currently 50 basis points over LIBOR rates. The borrowing rates in effect for the term loan borrowings at May 29, 2010 and August 29, 2009 were 0.78% and 0.79%, respectively.
Under the terms of the Credit Facility, the Company is subject to various operating and financial covenants, including a maximum consolidated leverage ratio and a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio. At May 29, 2010, the Company is in compliance with the operating and financial covenants of the Credit Facility.
The Company also has a long-term note payable in the amount of $218 to the Pennsylvania Industrial Development Authority, which is secured by the land on which the Harrisburg, Pennsylvania customer fulfillment center is located, which bears interest at 3% per annum and is payable in monthly installments of approximately $15 (includes principal and interest) through September 2011.
The Company paid dividends of $37,924 for the thirty-nine weeks ended May 29, 2010. On June 29, 2010, the Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.22 per share payable on July 27, 2010 to shareholders of record at the close of business on July 13, 2010. The dividend will result in a payout of approximately $13,801, based on the number of shares outstanding at June 29, 2010.
The Board of Directors established the MSC stock repurchase plan (the Plan) which allows the Company to repurchase shares at any time and in any increments it deems appropriate in accordance with Rule 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
During the thirty-nine weeks ended May 29, 2010, the Company repurchased 16 shares of its common stock in the open market at an aggregate cost of $855. This amount is not reported in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows since the transactions did not settle until June 2010. As of May 29, 2010, the maximum number of shares that may yet be repurchased under the Plan was 2,989 shares.
In addition to the above repurchases, upon vesting of certain restricted stock awards, 47 shares were reacquired to satisfy employees tax withholding obligations for the thirty-nine weeks ended May 29, 2010. These reacquired shares were recorded as an additional $2,211 of treasury stock. For the thirty-nine weeks ended May 30, 2009, 34 shares were reacquired to satisfy employees tax withholding obligations. These reacquired shares were recorded as an additional $1,200 of treasury stock.
During the thirty-nine weeks ended May 29, 2010 and May 30, 2009, the Company reissued approximately 46 and 64 shares, respectively, at a cost of approximately $1,776 and $1,252, respectively, to fund the Associate Stock Purchase Plan.
The Company generally offers a maximum one-year warranty, including parts and labor, for some of its machinery products. The specific terms and conditions of those warranties vary depending upon the product sold. The Company may be able to recoup some of these costs through product warranties it holds with its original equipment manufacturers, which typically range from thirty to ninety days. In general, many of the Companys general merchandise products are covered by third party original equipment manufacturers warranties. The Companys warranty expense for the thirty-nine week periods ended May 29, 2010 and May 30, 2009 was minimal.
9
During the thirteen and thirty-nine periods ended May 29, 2010, there were no material changes in unrecognized tax benefits.
With limited exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to Federal income tax examinations through fiscal 2006 and State jurisdictions through fiscal 2005.
There are various claims, lawsuits, and pending actions against the Company incidental to the operation of its business. Although the outcome of these matters is currently not determinable, management does not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.
As a government contractor, the Company is, from time to time, subject to governmental or regulatory inquiries or audits. As previously disclosed, the General Services Administrations (the GSA) Office of Inspector General has substantially completed an audit relating to the Companys sales to the government under a contract that the Company has with the GSA and concerning compliance with the Trade Agreements Act of 1979. The Trade Agreements Act prohibits the sale to the government of products obtained from certain countries. Based on the GSAs findings, in May 2010, the Department of Justice (the DOJ) asserted damages of approximately $3,300 relating to fiscal years prior to 2008. The Company has begun the process of discussing with the DOJ its claims and damages calculations. The timing and outcome of these discussions are not certain. If a settlement is not reached, the DOJ could commence civil litigation to recover treble damages. The Company believes it has complied with the GSA contract in all material respects and does not expect the ultimate resolution of this matter to have any material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, an update to Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. ASU 2010-06 provides an update specifically to Subtopic 820-10 that requires new disclosures, including details of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 measurements and the reasons for the transfers and a gross presentation of activity within the Level 3 roll forward, presenting separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements. ASU 2010-06 is effective for the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the gross presentation of the Level 3 roll forward, which is required for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of ASU 2010-06 did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In November 2008, the SEC issued for comment a proposed roadmap outlining several milestones that, if achieved, could lead to mandatory adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), which is a comprehensive series of accounting standards published by the International Accounting Standards Board (the IASB). In February 2010, the SEC approved a statement confirming its commitment to move toward a set of globally accepted accounting standards. As initially set forth in the November 2008 roadmap, the SEC intends to decide by 2011 whether to transition to IFRS and to implement the transition no earlier than 2015. The Company is currently assessing the impact that this potential change would have on its consolidated financial statements, and the Company will continue to monitor the development of the potential implementation of IFRS, as well as the ongoing convergence efforts of the FASB and the IASB.
The Company repurchased approximately 904 shares of its common stock for a total cost of approximately $45,173 during the period June 1, 2010 through June 10, 2010.
10
The following is intended to update the information contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 29, 2009 and presumes that readers have access to, and will have read, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K.
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, MSC, the Company, we, our, or us) is one of the largest direct marketers and distributors of a broad range of metalworking and maintenance, repair, and operations (MRO) products to customers throughout the United States.
We offer approximately 600,000 stock-keeping units (SKUs) through our master catalogs; weekly, monthly and quarterly specialty and promotional catalogs; newspapers; brochures; and the Internet, including our websites, MSCDirect.com, MSCMetalworking.com and Use-Enco.com (the MSC Websites). We service our customers from five customer fulfillment centers and 96 branch offices. Most of our products are carried in stock, and orders for these in-stock products are typically fulfilled the day on which the order is received. We also offer a nationwide cutoff time of 8:00 PM Eastern time on qualifying orders for customers in the contiguous United States, which will be delivered to the customer the next day at no additional cost.
Net sales increased by 28.5% and 8.4% for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended May 29, 2010, as compared to the same periods in fiscal 2009. Net sales, on an average daily basis, increased 26.5% and 7.8% for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended May 29, 2010, as compared to the same periods in fiscal 2009. The thirteen and thirty-nine week periods have one more business day than the corresponding prior year periods. Fiscal 2009 was characterized by credit constraints in the financial markets and a weak global economy that had impacted both our core manufacturing customers (the core business) and our national account and government program (the Large Account Customer). During this time, we took advantage of these market conditions by taking market share from our smaller competitors, who have experienced profitability, liquidity and operating cash flow challenges. We also increased our competitive advantages by investing in the growth of our business. These investments include, among other things, growth in our sales force, improvements to our electronic procurement tools, and productivity investments. These investments, combined with our huge product assortment, high in-stock levels, same day shipment, and high levels of execution, have increased our competitive advantage over smaller distributors.
There are encouraging trends in key economic indicators, such as the ISM index and durable goods orders, which indicate industry conditions have generally begun to improve. We believe that the financial results for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 reflect increased market share and greater demand for our products due to the more favorable economic and industry conditions compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2009. We are continuing to monitor the economic conditions for their impact on our customers and markets and assessing both risks and opportunities that may affect our business. See the discussion below describing recent fluctuations in economic indicators and the possible impact on our future sales and margins.
Our gross profit margin was 45.5% for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended May 29, 2010, as compared to 45.9% and 46.6% for the same periods in fiscal 2009. The decrease in gross margin was primarily driven by the change in customer and product mix as our Large Account Customers, which typically generate lower margins and also purchase more of our lower margin products, constituted a larger portion of our total sales.
Operating expenses increased for the thirteen week period ended May 29, 2010, as compared to the same period in fiscal 2009, as a result of the increased sales volume related expenses (primarily payroll related costs and freight expenses). The payroll related costs increase resulted from increased sales commissions and an increase in incentive compensation. As a result of the increase in sales, our operating margins for the thirteen week period ended May 29, 2010 increased to 15.6% compared to 12.9% for the same period in fiscal 2009.
Operating expenses increased for the thirty-nine week period ended May 29, 2010, as compared to the same period in fiscal 2009. The increase in operating expenses for the thirty-nine week period is primarily a result of an increase in payroll and payroll related costs. Included in payroll and payroll related costs are increases in incentive compensation, sales commissions, and medical costs. Medical costs of our self-insured
11
group health plan increased as a result of the increased number of medical claims filed by participants and the increased cost per claim. As a result of the decrease in gross margin, our operating margins for the thirty-nine week period ended May 29, 2010 decreased to 13.9%, as compared to 14.3% for the same period in fiscal 2009.
We expect operating costs to continue to increase through the remainder of fiscal 2010 as compared to the same period in fiscal 2009 due to increased sales volumes, compensation expenses, and fringe benefits. We have removed the compensation related cost containment measures that were implemented in fiscal 2009 and have partially restored merit salary increases. We anticipate that cash flows from operations, available cash and funds available under the revolving credit facility will be adequate to support our operations for the next twelve months.
The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) index, which measures the economic activity of the U.S. manufacturing sector, is important to our planning because it historically has been an indicator of our manufacturing customers activity. A substantial portion of our revenues came from sales in the manufacturing sector during the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended May 29, 2010, including some national account customers. An ISM reading below 50.0% generally indicates that the manufacturing sector is contracting. Conversely, an ISM reading above 50.0% generally indicates that the manufacturing sector is expanding. The ISM was 59.7% for the month of May 2010. We have historically experienced revenue growth during periods where the ISM is above 50%. Details released with the most recent index indicate that economic activity in the manufacturing sector related to new orders, production, and employment are all growing, while inventories are contracting. Historically, this has boded well for our future growth. However, there still remains significant uncertainty relating to the current economic environment. We are continuing to take advantage of our strong balance sheet, which enables us to maintain or extend credit to our credit worthy customers and maintain optimal inventory and service levels to meet customer demands during these challenging economic conditions, while many of our smaller competitors in our fragmented industry continue to have difficulties in offering competitive service levels. We also believe that customers will continue to seek cost reductions and shorter cycle times from their suppliers. Our business model focuses on providing overall procurement cost reduction and just-in-time delivery to meet our customers needs. We will seek to continue to drive cost reduction throughout our business through cost saving strategies and increased leverage from our existing infrastructure, and continue to provide additional procurement cost savings solutions to our customers through technology such as our Customer Managed Inventory and Vendor Managed Inventory programs.
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
May 29, 2010 |
May 30, 2009 |
Percentage Change |
May 29, 2010 |
May 30, 2009 |
Percentage Change |
|||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Sales | $ | 450,381 | $ | 350,489 | 28.5 | % | $ | 1,230,680 | $ | 1,135,421 | 8.4 | % |
Net sales increased 28.5%, or approximately $100 million for the thirteen week period ended May 29, 2010, as compared to the same period in fiscal 2009. Net sales, on an average daily basis, increased 26.5% for the thirteen week period ended May 29, 2010, as compared to the same period in fiscal 2009. We estimate that this increase is comprised of an increase in our Large Account Customer programs of approximately $49 million, an increase in the core business of approximately $48 million, and an increase in prices on certain stock keeping units (SKUs) of approximately $3 million. Included in the above comparisons is the effect of the additional one day of sales in the third quarter of fiscal 2010.
Net sales increased 8.4%, or approximately $95 million for the thirty-nine week period ended May 29, 2010, as compared to the same period in fiscal 2009. Net sales, on an average daily basis, increased 7.8% for the thirty-nine week period ended May 29, 2010, as compared to the same period in fiscal 2009. We estimate that this increase is comprised of an increase in our Large Account Customer programs of approximately $99 million and an increase in prices on certain SKUs of approximately $1 million. This is partially offset by a decline in the core business of approximately $5 million. Included in the above comparisons is the effect of the additional one day of sales in the third quarter of fiscal 2010.
12
The global economic recession impacted our net sales for the thirty-nine week period ended May 30, 2009. Net sales for the Company began to improve in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 and have continued to improve through the third quarter of fiscal 2010. Exclusive of the UK, average order size increased to approximately $327 for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 as compared to $293 in the third quarter of fiscal 2009. We believe that our ability to transact business with our customers through various electronic portals and directly through the MSC Websites, gives us a competitive advantage over smaller suppliers. As noted earlier, we believe that our competitive advantages have resulted in solid share gains for the Company. Sales through the MSC Websites were $137.1 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2010, representing 30.4% of consolidated net sales, compared to sales of $102.4 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2009, representing 29.2% of consolidated net sales. We grew our field sales associate headcount to 947 at May 29, 2010, an increase of approximately 2.2%, from field sales associates of 927 at May 30, 2009, in order to support our strategy to acquire new accounts and expand existing accounts across all customer types. We plan to increase our field sales associate headcount to approximately 970 by the end of fiscal 2010 and we will continue to manage the timing of new branch openings based on economic conditions.
In the fiscal 2010 MSC catalog distributed in September 2009, we added approximately 21,000 new stock keeping units (SKUs) and removed approximately 22,000 SKUs. We believe that the new SKUs improve the overall quality of our product offerings.
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
May 29, 2010 |
May 30, 2009 |
Percentage Change |
May 29, 2010 |
May 30, 2009 |
Percentage Change |
|||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Profit | $ | 204,882 | $ | 161,019 | 27.2 | % | $ | 559,616 | $ | 528,892 | 5.8 | % | ||||||||||||
Gross Profit Margin | 45.5 | % | 45.9 | % | 45.5 | % | 46.6 | % |
Gross profit margin for the thirty-nine week period ended May 29, 2010 declined from the comparable period in fiscal 2009. This is primarily a result of the change in customer and product mix, as our Large Account Customers, which typically generate lower gross margins due to larger volume discounts, and also purchase more of our lower gross margin products as a percentage of their sales volume, constituted a larger portion of our total sales.
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
May 29, 2010 |
May 30, 2009 |
Percentage Change |
May 29, 2010 |
May 30, 2009 |
Percentage Change |
|||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Expenses | $ | 134,481 | $ | 115,778 | 16.2 | % | $ | 388,303 | $ | 365,981 | 6.1 | % | ||||||||||||
Percentage of Net Sales | 29.9 | % | 33.0 | % | 31.6 | % | 32.2 | % |
The increase in operating expenses in dollars for the thirteen week period ended May 29, 2010, as compared to the same period in fiscal 2009, was a result of increases in incentive compensation, freight expenses, and sales commissions. This is partially offset by a decrease in advertising expenses resulting from reduced numbers of brochures mailed.
The increase in operating expenses in dollars for the thirty-nine week period ended May 29, 2010, as compared to the same period in fiscal 2009, was primarily a result of increases in payroll and payroll related costs. This was partially offset by a decline in advertising expenses resulting from reduced numbers of brochures mailed.
Payroll and payroll related costs continue to make up a significant portion of our operating expenses. These costs increased for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended May 29, 2010, as compared to the same periods in the prior fiscal year, primarily as a result of increased incentive compensation, sales commissions, medical costs, and an increase in staffing levels to support our growth initiatives. In addition,
13
the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended May 29, 2010 include the partial restoration of associate merit increases. For the thirty-nine week period ended May 29, 2010, this increase was partially offset by the reduction in associate hours in volume sensitive areas, such as fulfillment and call centers, during the first two quarters of fiscal 2010.
We have experienced an increase in the medical costs of our self-insured group health plan for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended May 29, 2010, as compared to the same periods in fiscal 2009. This is a result of an increase in both the number of medical claims filed by participants of our self-insured group health plan and the average cost per claim, which has been adversely affected by an increase in the number of large claims. It is uncertain as to whether the medical costs will continue to increase through the remainder of fiscal 2010.
The decrease in operating expenses as a percentage of net sales for the thirteen week period ended May 29, 2010, as compared to the same period in fiscal 2009, was primarily a result of the allocation of fixed expenses over a larger revenue base. The decrease in operating expenses as a percentage of net sales for the thirty-nine week period ended May 29, 2010, as compared to the same period in fiscal 2009, was primarily a result of the productivity gains related to the cost containment measures we put in place and the allocation of fixed expenses over a larger revenue base.
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
May 29, 2010 |
May 30, 2009 |
Percentage Change |
May 29, 2010 |
May 30, 2009 |
Percentage Change |
|||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income from Operations | $ | 70,401 | $ | 45,241 | 55.6 | % | $ | 171,313 | $ | 162,911 | 5.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Percentage of Net Sales | 15.6 | % | 12.9 | % | 13.9 | % | 14.3 | % |
The increase in income from operations for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended May 29, 2010, as compared to the same periods in fiscal 2009, was primarily attributable to the increases in net sales, offset in part by the increases in operating expenses as described above. Income from operations as a percentage of net sales increased for the thirteen week period ended May 29, 2010, as compared to the same period in fiscal 2009, primarily as a result of the distribution of expenses over a larger revenue base. Income from operations as a percentage of net sales decreased for the thirty-nine week period ended May 29, 2010, as compared to the same period in fiscal 2009, primarily as a result of the decrease in gross profit margin.
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
May 29, 2010 |
May 30, 2009 |
Percentage Change |
May 29, 2010 |
May 30, 2009 |
Percentage Change |
|||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Expense | $ | (248 | ) | $ | (544 | ) | (54.4 | )% | $ | (993 | ) | $ | (3,212 | ) | (69.1 | )% |
The decrease in interest expense for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended May 29, 2010, as compared to the same periods in fiscal 2009, was due to a combination of lower weighted average interest rates and lower average loan balances. Average loan balances outstanding for the term loan and revolving loans for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended May 29, 2010 were approximately $112.5 million and $155.5 million, respectively, as compared to approximately $209.3 million and $212.9 million for the same periods in fiscal 2009. The decrease in the average loan balances for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods is primarily a result of the pay down of the outstanding balance on the revolving credit line commitment during the thirteen weeks ended May 29, 2010 and the increased scheduled quarterly principal payments made on the term loan beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009.
14
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
May 29, 2010 |
May 30, 2009 |
Percentage Change |
May 29, 2010 |
May 30, 2009 |
Percentage Change |
|||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for Income Taxes | $ | 25,968 | $ | 17,171 | 51.2 | % | $ | 64,172 | $ | 61,325 | 4.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Effective Tax Rate | 36.98 | % | 38.22 | % | 37.64 | % | 38.22 | % |
The effective tax rate for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended May 29, 2010 was 36.98% and 37.64%, compared to 38.22% for the comparable periods in fiscal 2009. The rate decrease is primarily attributable to the impact of the completion of the Federal income tax examination for fiscal year 2006.
Thirteen Weeks Ended | Thirty-Nine Weeks Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
May 29, 2010 |
May 30, 2009 |
Percentage Change |
May 29, 2010 |
May 30, 2009 |
Percentage Change |
|||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income | $ | 44,247 | $ | 27,755 | 59.4 | % | $ | 106,316 | $ | 99,128 | 7.3 | % | ||||||||||||
Diluted Earnings Per Share | $ | 0.69 | $ | 0.44 | 56.8 | % | $ | 1.67 | $ | 1.58 | 5.7 | % |
The factors which affected net income for the thirteen and thirty-nine week periods ended May 29, 2010, as compared to the same periods in fiscal 2009, have been discussed above.
As of May 29, 2010, we held $167.9 million in cash and cash equivalent funds consisting primarily of money market funds that invest primarily in U.S. government and government agency securities and municipal bond securities and contain portfolios with average maturities of less than three months. Historically, our primary capital needs have been to fund our working capital requirements necessitated by our sales growth, the cost of an acquisition, adding new products, and facilities expansions. Our primary sources of capital have been cash generated from operations. Borrowings under our credit facility, together with cash generated from operations, have been used to fund our working capital needs, repurchase shares of our Class A common stock, and pay dividends. At May 29, 2010, total borrowings outstanding were $59.9 million, as compared to $193.5 million at August 29, 2009.
We have an unsecured credit facility that consists of a revolving credit line commitment and term loan facility (the Credit Facility) which expires on June 8, 2011. We have a $150.0 million revolving credit line commitment, of which $0 and $95.0 million was outstanding at May 29, 2010 and August 29, 2009, respectively. We paid down the $95.0 million outstanding balance in April 2010. The interest rate payable for borrowings under the revolving credit line commitment is currently 40 basis points over LIBOR rates. These interest rates will reset in thirty, sixty, ninety, or one hundred eighty day increments, at the Companys discretion. We are also charged a fee of 10 basis points on the borrowed and unborrowed balances of the revolving loans. The loans under the revolving credit line commitment are due on June 8, 2011.
At May 29, 2010 and August 29, 2009, under our Credit Facility, we had term loan borrowings outstanding of $59.7 million and $98.1 million, respectively. Remaining payments as of May 29, 2010 consist of quarterly installments of $20.5 million in each of the next two quarters commencing in June 2010, and a final payment of approximately $18.7 million due in December 2010. Optional prepayments may be made at any time, or from time to time, in whole or part, without premium or penalty. The interest rate payable for borrowings under the term loan is currently 50 basis points over LIBOR rates. The borrowing rates in effect for the term loan borrowings at May 29, 2010 and August 29, 2009 were 0.78% and 0.79%, respectively. As of May 29, 2010, the current interest rate will reset in thirty day periods.
15
Under the terms of the Credit Facility, we are subject to various operating and financial covenants, including a maximum consolidated leverage ratio and a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio. At May 29, 2010, we were in compliance with the operating and financial covenants of the Credit Facility.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the thirty-nine week periods ended May 29, 2010 and May 30, 2009 was $109.3 million and $239.1 million, respectively. The decrease of approximately $129.8 million in net cash provided from operations resulted primarily from increases in accounts receivable and inventory, offset by an increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.
Net cash used in investing activities for the thirty-nine week periods ended May 29, 2010 and May 30, 2009 was $21.5 million and $17.6 million, respectively, and relate primarily to the purchase of property, plant and equipment.
Net cash used in financing activities for the thirty-nine week periods ended May 29, 2010 and May 30, 2009 was $145.4 million and $56.0 million, respectively. The increase of approximately $89.4 million in net cash used in financing activities was primarily attributable to the paydown of the outstanding balance on the revolving credit line commitments of $95.0 million, offset by the increase in proceeds from the exercise of Class A common stock options.
The Board of Directors established the MSC stock repurchase plan (the Plan) which allows the Company to repurchase shares at any time and in any increments it deems appropriate in accordance with Rule 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Under the Plan, we repurchased 16,000 shares of Class A common stock in the open market for approximately $0.9 million during the thirty-nine week period ended May 29, 2010. We did not repurchase any shares of our Class A common stock in the open market during the thirty-nine week period ended May 30, 2009. In addition, we repurchased approximately 904,000 of Class A common stock in the open market for a total cost of approximately $45.2 million during the period June 1, 2010 through June 10, 2010.
We paid a dividend of $12.7 million on April 27, 2010, $12.6 million on February 2, 2010 and $12.6 million on November 13, 2009 to shareholders of record at the close of business on April 16, 2010, January 19, 2010 and October 30, 2009, respectively. On June 29, 2010, the Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.22 per share payable on July 27, 2010 to shareholders of record at the close of business on July 13, 2010. The dividend will result in a payout of approximately $13.8 million, based on the number of shares outstanding at June 29, 2010.
Although there are positive signs of an economic recovery, the continuing economic recessionary conditions could negatively impact our overall business, and as a result, could negatively impact our liquidity. In addition, the continuing instability in the financial markets could limit our access to additional capital resources, if needed, and could increase associated costs. We believe, based on our current business plan, that our existing cash, cash equivalents, funds available under the revolving Credit Facility, and cash flow from operations will be sufficient to fund our planned capital expenditures and operating cash requirements for at least the next 12 months.
We are affiliated with two real estate entities (together, the Affiliates), which lease property to us. The Affiliates are owned and controlled by our principal shareholders, Mitchell Jacobson, our Chairman, and his sister Marjorie Gershwind, and by their family related trusts. We paid rent under operating leases to the Affiliates for the first thirty-nine weeks of fiscal 2010 of approximately $1.7 million, in connection with our occupancy of our Atlanta Customer Fulfillment Center and one branch office. In the opinion of our management, based on its market research, the leases with Affiliates are on terms which approximate fair market value.
Certain of our operations are conducted on leased premises, two of which are leased from Affiliates, as noted above. The leases (most of which require us to provide for the payment of real estate taxes, insurance and other operating costs) are for varying periods, the longest extending to the year 2030, at May 29, 2010. In addition, we are obligated under certain equipment and automobile operating leases, which expire on varying dates through 2014.
16
We have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements.
We make estimates, judgments and assumptions in determining the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Estimates are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The estimates are used to form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the amount of revenues and expenses reported that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates. Our significant accounting policies are described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. The accounting policies described below are impacted by our critical accounting estimates.
We perform periodic credit evaluations of our customers financial condition and collateral is generally not required. We evaluate the collectibility of accounts receivable based on numerous factors, including past transaction history with customers and their credit-worthiness. We estimate an allowance for doubtful accounts as a percentage of net sales based on historical bad debt experience and adjust it for changes in the overall aging of accounts receivable, as well as specifically identified customers that are having difficulty meeting their financial obligations (e.g., bankruptcy, etc.). Historically, there has not been significant volatility in our bad debt expense due to strict adherence to our credit policy.
Inventories consist of merchandise held for resale and are stated at the lower of weighted average cost or market. Management evaluates the need to record adjustments to reduce inventory to net realizable value on a quarterly basis. Each quarter, items to be liquidated are specifically identified and written-down, using historical data and reasonable assumptions, to their estimated market value, if less than their cost. Inherent in the estimates of market value are managements estimates related to customer demand, technological and/or market obsolescence, possible alternative uses and ultimate realization of excess inventory.
We have a self-insured group health plan. We are responsible for all covered claims up to a maximum liability of $300,000 per participant during a September 1 plan year. Benefits paid in excess of $300,000 are reimbursed to the plan under our stop loss policy. Due to the time lag between the time claims are incurred and the time claims are paid by us, a reserve for those claims incurred but not reported (IBNR) is established. The amount of this reserve is reviewed quarterly and is evaluated based on a historical analysis of claim trends, reporting and processing lag times and medical costs inflation.
See Note 11 to the accompanying financial statements.
There have been no material changes to our exposures to market risks since August 29, 2009. Please refer to the 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 29, 2009 for a complete discussion of our exposures to market risks.
Our senior management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act) designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits
17
under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuers management, including its principal executive officer or officers and principal financial officer or officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
In accordance with Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15, we carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as well as other key members of our management, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of the end of the period covered by this report, to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is (i) accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms.
No change occurred in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and Rule 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter ended May 29, 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
18
There are various claims, lawsuits, and pending actions against the Company incidental to the operation of its business. Although the outcome of these matters is currently not determinable, management does not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations, or liquidity.
As a government contractor, the Company is, from time to time, subject to governmental or regulatory inquiries or audits. As previously disclosed, the General Services Administrations (the GSA) Office of Inspector General has substantially completed an audit relating to the Companys sales to the government under a contract that the Company has with the GSA and concerning compliance with the Trade Agreements Act of 1979. The Trade Agreements Act prohibits the sale to the government of products obtained from certain countries. Based on the GSAs findings, in May 2010, the Department of Justice (the DOJ) asserted damages of approximately $3.3 million relating to fiscal years prior to 2008. The Company has begun the process of discussing with the DOJ its claims and damages calculations. The timing and outcome of these discussions are not certain. If a settlement is not reached, the DOJ could commence civil litigation to recover treble damages. The Company believes it has complied with the GSA contract in all material respects and does not expect the ultimate resolution of this matter to have any material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
In addition to the other information set forth in this Report, consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 29, 2009, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in the aforementioned report are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be not material also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
The following table sets forth repurchases by the Company of its outstanding shares of Class A common stock during the thirteen week period ended May 29, 2010:
Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased |
Average Price Paid Per Share(1) |
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs(2) |
Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
||||||||||||
02/28/10 03/27/10 | | | | 3,005,657 | ||||||||||||
03/28/10 04/27/10 | | | | 3,005,657 | ||||||||||||
04/28/10 05/29/10 | 16,468 | $ | 51.89 | 16,468 | 2,989,189 | |||||||||||
Total | 16,468 | $ | 51.89 | 16,468 |
(1) | Average price paid per share includes any commissions paid. Activity is reported on a trade date basis. |
(2) | During fiscal 1999, the Board of Directors established the MSC stock repurchase plan (the Plan). The total number of shares of Class A common stock initially authorized for future repurchase was set at 5,000,000 shares. On January 8, 2008, the Board of Directors reaffirmed and replenished the Plan so that the total number of shares of Class A common stock authorized for future repurchase was increased to 7,000,000 shares. As of May 29, 2010, the maximum number of shares that may yet be repurchased under the Plan was 2,989,189 shares. There is no expiration date for this program. |
19
Exhibits: |
||
31.1 | Chief Executive Officers Certificate, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* | |
31.2 | Chief Financial Officers Certificate, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
* | Filed herewith. |
| Furnished herewith. |
20
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
MSC Industrial Direct Co., Inc. | ||
Dated: July 1, 2010 | By: /s/ David Sandler | |
Dated: July 1, 2010 | By: /s/ Charles Boehlke |
21
Exhibit No. | Exhibit | |
31.1 | Chief Executive Officers Certificate, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* | |
31.2 | Chief Financial Officers Certificate, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
* | Filed herewith. |
| Furnished herewith. |
22