Edgar Filing: POSITIVEID Corp

psid20130630_10q.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

☑

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013

☐

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 001-33297

POSITIVEID CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE		06-1637809
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1690 South Congress Avenue, Suite 201
Delray Beach, Florida 33445		(561) 805-8000
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)		(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☑ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☑ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☐	Accelerated filer ☐	Non-accelerated filer ☐	Smaller reporting company ☑
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☑

The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the close of business on August 9, 2013 is as follows:

Class		Number of Shares
Common Stock: $0.01 Par Value		24,055,194

POSITIVEID CORPORATION

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I —FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets — June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012	1

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations — Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012	2

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit — Six Months Ended June 30, 2013	3

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012	4

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	5

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS	25

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	27

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	31

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	31

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	32

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS	32

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	34

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.	35

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	35

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION	35

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS	35

SIGNATURES	36

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

POSITIVEID CORPORATION

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except share data)

	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
	(unaudited)
Assets
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	65		$	111
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		10			37
Total Current Assets		75			148

Equipment, net		18			24
Prepaid tax advance		708			738
Goodwill		510			510
Intangibles, net		784			980
Other assets		11			11
Total Assets	$	2,106		$	2,411

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	562		$	967
Deferred revenue		2,500			1,000
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		1,402			1,449
Convertible debt, net of discount		365			221
Notes payable		694			716
Warrant liability		55			93
Tax contingency		896			337
Total Current Liabilities		6,474			4,783

Tax contingency		—			743
Contingent earn-out liability		714			645
Total Liabilities		7,188			6,171

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders’ Deficit:
Convertible preferred stock, 5,000,000 shares authorized, $.001 par value; Series F Preferred – 150 and 776 shares issued and outstanding, liquidation preference of $165 and $876, at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively		—			—
Common stock, 470,000,000 shares authorized, $.01 par value, 19,548,610 and 9,541,174 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively		195			2,385
Common stock payable		235			—
Additional paid-in capital		113,681			105,448
Accumulated deficit		(119,193	)		(111,329	)
		(5,082	)		(3,496	)
Note receivable for shares issued		—			(264	)
Total Stockholders’ Deficit		(5,082	)		(3,760	)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit	$	2,106		$	2,411

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

POSITIVEID CORPORATION

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Revenue	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Cost of sales		—			—			—			—
Gross profit		—			—			—			—

Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative		1,288			1,636			2,882			3,803
Research and development		160			246			331			496
Total operating expenses		1,448			1,882			3,213			4,299
Operating loss		(1, 448	)		(1,882	)		(3,213	)		(4,299	)

Other income (expense), net		(30	)		(7	)		(166	)		62
Net loss		(1,478	)		(1,889	)		(3,379	)		(4,237	)

Preferred stock dividends		101			(22	)		91			(48	)
Beneficial conversion dividend on preferred stock		(1,080	)		(2,889	)		(4,485	)		(4,895	)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	$	(2,457	)	$	(4,800	)	$	(7,773	)	$	(9,180	)

Loss per common share attributable to common stockholders – basic and diluted	$	(0.19	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.66	)	$	(0.10	)

Weighted average shares outstanding – basic and diluted		12,649			111,684			11,761			95,602

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

POSITIVEID CORPORATION

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2013

(In thousands, except share data)

(Unaudited)

	Preferred Stock					Common Stock							Additional Paid-in			Accumulated			Note Receivable For Shares			Total Stockholders’ Equity
	Shares			Amount		Shares		Amount			Payable		Capital			Deficit			Issued			(Deficit)

Balance at January 1, 2013		776			—		9,541		2,385			—		105,448			(111,329	)		(264	)		(3,760	)

Conversion of Series F Preferred shares and repayment of note receivable		(626	)		—		3,925		39			—		52			—			264			355
Beneficial conversion dividends for Series F Preferred conversion		—			—		—		—			—		4,485			(4,485	)		—			—
Issuance of Common Stock pursuant to convertible note conversion		—			—		681		7			—		143			—			—			150
Beneficial conversion feature and issuance of warrants related to financing agreement		—			—		—		—			—		19			—			—			19
Cost of debt related to debenture agreement		—			—		244		2			—		101			—			—			103
Issuance of Common Stock pursuant to stock purchase agreement		—			—		1,307		13			—		286			—			—			299
Issuance of Common Stock pursuant to debt to equity settlement including discount on shares		—			—		377		4			235		67						—			306
Cost of debt related to stock purchase agreement		—			—		145		2			—		(14	)		—			—			(12	)
Stock-based compensation		—			—		3,328		33			—		804			—			—			837
Reverse stock-split adjustment		—			—		—		(2,290	)		—		2,290			—			—			—
Net loss		—			—		—		—			—		—			(3,379	)		—			(3,379	)

Balance at June 30, 2013		150		$	—		19,548	$	195		$	235	$	113,681		$	(119,193	)	$	—		$	(5,082	)

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

POSITIVEID CORPORATION

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2013			2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(3,379	)	$	(4,237	)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		204			216
Stock-based compensation to employees and advisors		449			828
Debt discount and cost amortization		206			—
Discount on liability settlement		92			—
Warrants fair-value adjustments		(101	)		—
Non-cash interest expense		14			—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets		(128	)		22
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses		279			1,906
Increase in deferred revenue		1,500			—
Net cash used in operating activities		(864	)		(1,265	)
Cash flows from investing activity:
Purchase of equipment		(3	)		(5	)
Net cash used in investing activity		(3	)		(5	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from equity financings, net of fees		551			1,488
Proceeds from debt financing, net of fees		608			—
Principal payment of short-term debt		(338	)		—
Net cash provided by financing activities		821			1,488
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(46	)		218
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		111			28
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	65		$	246

Supplementary Cash Flow Information:
Non-cash financing and investing activities:
Conversion of promissory note	$	150		$	—
Issuance of shares for fees		147			—
Issuance of warrants for advisory services		58			—
Equity conversion of accrued compensation payable		388			—
	$	738		$	—

See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

POSITIVEID CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Organization and Basis of Presentation

PositiveID, through its wholly owned subsidiary MicroFluidic Systems (“MFS”) (collectively, the “Company” or “PositiveID”) , develops molecular diagnostic systems for bio-threat detection, for rapid diagnostic testing, and also develops assays to detect a range of biological threats. The Company’s M-BAND (Microfluidic Bio-agent Autonomous Networked Detector) system is an airborne bio-threat detection system developed for the homeland defense industry, to detect biological weapons of mass destruction. The Company is also developing automated pathogen detection systems Firefly Dx (handheld) and Dragonfly (desktop) for rapid diagnostics, both for point of need and clinical applications.

PositiveID is a Delaware corporation formed in 2001. The Company commenced operations in 2002 as VeriChip Corporation. In 2007, the Company completed an initial public offering of its common stock.

In July 2008, the Company completed the sale of all of the outstanding capital stock of its subsidiary, Xmark Corporation (“Xmark”), which at the time was principally all of the Company’s operations to Stanley Canada Corporation (“Stanley”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Stanley Black and Decker. The sale transaction was closed for $47.9 million in cash, which consisted of the $45 million purchase price plus a balance sheet adjustment of approximately $2.9 million, which was adjusted to $2.8 million at settlement of the escrow. Under the terms of the stock purchase agreement, $43.4 million of the proceeds were paid at closing and $4.4 million was released from escrow in July 2009. As a result, the Company recorded a gain on the sale of Xmark of $6.2 million, with $4.5 million of that gain deferred until the escrow was settled in 2009.

Following the completion of the sale, the Company retired all of its outstanding debt for a combined payment of $13.5 million and settled all contractual payments to Xmark’s and the Company’s officers and management for $9.1 million. In August 2008, the Company paid a special dividend to its stockholders of $15.8 million.

In November 2008, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (“APA”) with Digital Angel Corporation and Destron Fearing Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Digital Angel Corporation, which collectively is referred to as “Digital Angel.” The terms of the APA included the Company’s purchase of patents related to an embedded bio-sensor system for use in humans, and the assignment of any rights of Digital Angel under a development agreement associated with the development of an implantable glucose sensing microchip. The Company also received covenants from Digital Angel Corporation and Destron Fearing that will permit the use of intellectual property of Digital Angel related to the Company’s health care business without payment of ongoing royalties, as well as inventory and a limited period of technology support by Digital Angel. The Company paid Digital Angel $500,000 at the closing of the APA, which was recorded in the financials as research and development expense.

In September 2009, the Company, VeriChip Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Acquisition Subsidiary”), and Steel Vault Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Steel Vault”), signed an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (the “Merger Agreement”), dated September 4, 2009, as amended, pursuant to which the Acquisition Subsidiary was merged with and into Steel Vault on November 10, 2009, with Steel Vault surviving and becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (the “Merger”). Upon the consummation of the Merger, all outstanding shares, options and warrants of Steel Vault’s common stock were converted into approximately 0.2 million shares of common stock, 0.1 million options, and 18,200 warrants of the Company. At the closing of the Merger, the Company changed its name to PositiveID Corporation.

In February 2010, the Company acquired the assets of Easy Check Medical Diagnostics, LLC (“Easy Check”), which included the glucose breath analysis system and the iglucose wireless communication system. The Company issued 12,000 shares of common stock in February 2010, with a fair value of $351,000, as consideration for the purchase. The purchase agreement also included certain contingent payments and cash royalties based on future revenues.

In May 2011, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement to acquire MFS, pursuant to which MFS became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

Beginning with the acquisition of MFS, the Company began a process to focus its operations on molecular diagnostics and detection. Since acquiring MFS, the Company has (i) sold substantially all of the assets of NationalCreditReport.com in 2011, which it had acquired in the merger that formed PositiveID in 2009, (ii) sold its VeriChip and HealthLink (personal health record) businesses in 2012, and (iii) entered into an exclusive license for its iglucose technology in 2013. The Company will continue to seek either strategic partners or acquirers for its GlucoChip (glucose sensing microchip) and its glucose breath detection system.

POSITIVEID CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Authorized Common Stock (Reverse Stock Split)

As of June 30, 2013, the Company was authorized to issue 470 million shares of common stock. On April 18, 2013, the Company’s stockholders approved a reverse stock split within a range between 1-for-10 to 1-for-25. On that same date, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a reverse stock split in the ratio of 1-for- 25 and the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to its Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware to effect the reverse stock split. The reverse split only affected outstanding common stock and the number of authorized shares was not adjusted. On April 23, 2013, the reverse stock split became effective. All share amounts in our historical financial statements have been adjusted to reflect the 1-for-25 reverse stock split.

Going Concern

The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As of June 30, 2013, the Company had a working capital deficiency of approximately $6.4 million and an accumulated deficit of $119.2 million, compared to a working capital deficiency of $4.6 million and an accumulated deficit of approximately $111.3 million as of December 31, 2012. The Company has incurred operating losses since its inception, and has not generated revenue from continuing operations since 2009. The current operating losses are the result of research and development expenses and selling, general and administrative expenses. The Company expects its operating losses to continue through at least 2013. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to obtain financing to fund the continued development of its products and to support working capital requirements. Until the Company is able to achieve operating profits, the Company will continue to seek to access the capital markets. In 2012 and 2011, the Company raised approximately $7.4 million from the issuance of convertible preferred stock, common stock under an equity line financing, and convertible debt. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company has raised approximately $0.8 million, net of $0.3 million principal payment, from a debenture, convertible notes, preferred stock conversions, and through its equity line financings (See Note 4). Additionally, in March and April 2013 the Company received $1,500,000 in two equal installments, under its license agreement with The Boeing Company (see Note 9). During 2013, the Company will need to raise additional capital in order to execute its business plan.

These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company intends to continue to access capital to provide funds to meet its working capital requirements for the near-term future. In addition and if necessary, the Company could reduce and/or delay certain discretionary research, development and related activities and costs. However, there can be no assurances that the Company will be able to negotiate additional sources of equity or credit for its long term capital needs. The Company’s inability to have continuous access to such financing at reasonable costs could materially and adversely impact its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, and result in significant dilution to the Company’s existing stockholders. The Company’s consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating recoverability of assets and classifications of assets and liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2012 has been derived from the Company’s audited financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2013 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information not misleading. In the opinion of the Company’s management, all adjustments (including normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation for the periods presented have been reflected as required by Regulation S-X, Rule 10-01.

The unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year. These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

POSITIVEID CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Loss per Common Share

Basic and diluted loss per common share for all periods presented is calculated based on the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. The following potentially dilutive securities were outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and 2012 and were not included in the computation of dilutive loss per common share because the effect would have been anti-dilutive (in thousands):

	June 30,
	2013		2012
Convertible preferred stock		12		95
Stock options		428		423
Warrants		636		12
Unvested shares of restricted common stock		5,865		16
		6,941		546

Segment Information

The Company operates in a single market segment.

Reclassification

During the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company revised its allocation method for the expenses of its MFS subsidiary between Research and Development (“R&D”) expenses and Selling, General and Administrative (“SGA”) expenses. As a result, the Company has made reclassification of such expenses in its quarterly reporting for 2011 (not presented herein) and 2012 increasing R&D and decreasing SGA. The three-month expense amounts as reported in the Company’s Forms 10-Q, for the quarters ended September 30, 2012, June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012 were changed by approximately $150,000, $140,000 and $135,000, respectively. There was no impact on the Company’s operating loss, balance sheet or cash flow statements in any period.

Additionally, certain items previously reported in the consolidated financial statement captions have been reclassified to conform to the current financial statement presentation.

3. Acquisitions/Dispositions

MicroFluidic Systems Acquisition

On May 23, 2011, the Company acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of MFS in a transaction accounted for using the purchase method of accounting (the “Acquisition”). Since MFS’s inception, its key personnel have had an important role in developing technologies to automate the process of biological pathogen detection.

As consideration for the consummation of the Acquisition, the Company paid $250,000 to fund certain accounts payable of MFS (of which approximately $24,000 was paid to selling shareholders) and issued 95,000 shares of common stock of the Company (the “Stock Consideration”). The Company issued a total of 38,857 shares of common stock in 2011 to its advisors for brokerage services rendered in conjunction with the Acquisition. The Company incurred a charge in 2011 of approximately $550,000 related to the direct costs of the Acquisition, consisting of the $365,000 value of the shares of common stock issued to its advisors and $185,000 of cash costs. The Company issued an additional 18,406 shares of common stock to the advisors during the first quarter of 2012, pursuant to which a charge of approximately $69,000 was recorded.

POSITIVEID CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

In connection with the Acquisition, the Company is also required to make certain earn-out payments, up to a maximum of $4,000,000 payable in shares of the Company’s common stock, upon certain conditions over 2013 and 2014 (the “Earn-Out Payment”). There was also opportunity for the MFS sellers to achieve Earn-Out Payments in 2011 and 2012. Targets were not met in either of these two years. The earn-out for years 2013-2014 is based on MFS achieving certain earnings targets for the respective year, subject to a maximum Earn-Out Payment of $2,000,000 per year and an overall cumulative maximum Earn-Out Payment of $4,000,000. Additionally, approximately two-thirds of the earn-out is capped at $8.00 per share. Further, the Company is prohibited from making any Earn-Out Payment until stockholder approval is obtained if the aggregate number of shares to be issued exceeds 19.99% of the Company’s common stock outstanding immediately prior to the closing. In the event the Company is unable to obtain any required stockholder approval, the Company is obligated to pay the applicable Earn-Out Payment in cash to the sellers. In addition, the Company may pay any Earn-Out Payment in cash at its option.

The estimated purchase price of the Acquisition totaled approximately $1,653,000, comprised of (i) $24,000 in cash, (ii) Stock Consideration of $879,000 based on a stock price of $9.25 per share, and (iii) contingent consideration of approximately $750,000. The fair value of the contingent consideration was estimated based upon the present value of the probability-weighted expected future payouts under the earn-out arrangement. On October 31, 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with two of the selling MFS shareholders pursuant to which the two individuals waived their right to any earn-out compensation for 2011 in settlement of the closing working capital adjustment provisions of the purchase agreement.

Sale of Subsidiary to Related Party

On January 11, 2012, VeriTeQ Acquisition Corporation (“VeriTeQ”), which is owned and controlled by Mr. Silverman, our former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, purchased all of the outstanding capital stock of PositiveID Animal Health (“Animal Health”) in exchange for a secured promissory note in the amount of $200,000 (the “Note”) and 4 million shares of common stock of VeriTeQ representing a 10% ownership interest, to which no value was ascribed. Our chief executive officer, Mr. Caragol, served on the Board of Directors of VeriTeQ until July 8, 2013. The Note accrues interest at 5% per annum. Payments under the Note were to begin on January 11, 2013 and are due and payable monthly, and the Note matures on January 11, 2015. The Note is secured by substantially all of the assets of Animal Health pursuant to a Security Agreement dated January 11, 2012 (the “VeriTeQ Security Agreement”). The Company has not recorded the Note or any accrued interest in its consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2013, and currently plans to recognize the $200,000 gain represented by the Note as the Note is collected. As of June 30, 2013, VeriTeQ had not yet made payment on the Note.

In connection with the sale, the Company entered into a license agreement with VeriTeQ (the “Original License Agreement”) which grants VeriTeQ a non-exclusive, perpetual, non-transferable, license to utilize the Company’s bio-sensor implantable radio frequency identification (RFID) device that is protected under United States Patent No. 7,125,382, “Embedded Bio Sensor System” (the “Patent”) for the purpose of designing and constructing, using, selling and offering to sell products or services related to the VeriChip business, but excluding the GlucoChip or any product or application involving blood glucose detection or diabetes management. Pursuant to the Original License Agreement, the Company was to receive royalties in the amount of 10% on all gross revenues arising out of or relating to VeriTeQ’s sale of products, whether by license or otherwise, specifically relating to the Patent, and a royalty of 20% on gross revenues that are generated under the Development and Supply Agreement between the Company and Medical Components, Inc. (“Medcomp”) dated April 2, 2009. The total cumulative royalty payments under the agreement with Medcomp will not exceed $600,000.

The Company also entered into a shared services agreement with VeriTeQ on January 11, 2012 (the “SSA”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to provide certain services, including administrative, rent, accounting, business development and marketing, to VeriTeQ in exchange for $30,000 per month. The SSA has also included working capital advances from time to time. The term of the Shared Services Agreement commenced on January 23, 2012. The first payment for such services was not payable until VeriTeQ receives gross proceeds of a financing of at least $500,000. The balance due from VeriTeQ under the SSA, including certain expenses paid by the Company on behalf of VeriTeQ, totaled approximately $160,000 as of May 31, 2012, which was not recorded in the Company’s balance sheet and was to be recorded on a cash basis as collected. On June 25, 2012, the level of resources provided under the SSA was reduced and the agreement was amended, pursuant to which all amounts owed to the Company under the SSA as of May 31, 2012 were converted into 2,285,779 shares of common stock of VeriTeQ, to which no value was ascribed. In addition, effective June 1, 2012, the monthly charge for the shared services under the SSA was reduced from $30,000 to $12,000.

POSITIVEID CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

On June 26, 2012, the Original License Agreement was amended pursuant to which the license was converted from a non-exclusive license to an exclusive license, subject to VeriTeQ meeting certain minimum royalty requirements as follows: 2013 - $400,000; 2014 - $800,000; and 2015 and thereafter - $1,600,000.

On August 28, 2012, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (“APA”) with VeriTeQ (the “VeriTeQ Asset Purchase Agreement”), whereby VeriTeQ purchased all of the intellectual property, including patents and patents pending, related to the Company’s embedded biosensor portfolio of intellectual property. There were no proceeds received in connection with this sale and the intellectual property had a book value of nil. Under the VeriTeQ APA, the Company is to receive royalties in the amount of ten percent (10%) on all gross revenues arising out of or relating to VeriTeQ’s sale of products, whether by license or otherwise, specifically relating to the embedded biosensor intellectual property, to be calculated quarterly with royalty payments due within 30 days of each quarter end. In 2012, there are no minimum royalty requirements. Minimum royalty requirements thereafter, and through the remaining life of any of the patents and patents pending, are identical to the minimum royalties due under the Original License Agreement, as amended.

Simultaneously with the VeriTeQ APA, the Company entered into a license agreement with VeriTeQ granting the Company an exclusive, perpetual, transferable, worldwide and royalty-free license to the Patent and patents pending that are a component of the GlucoChip in the fields of blood glucose monitoring and diabetes management. In connection with the VeriTeQ APA, the Original License Agreement, as amended June 26, 2012, was terminated. Also on August 28, 2012, the VeriTeQ Security Agreement was amended, pursuant to which the assets sold by the Company to VeriTeQ under the VeriTeQ APA and the related royalty payments were added as collateral under the VeriTeQ Security Agreement.

On August 28, 2012, the SSA was further amended to align with the level of services being provided, pursuant to which, effective September 1, 2012, the monthly charge for the shared services under the SSA was reduced from $12,000 to $5,000. As of December 31, 2012 and June 30, 2013, VeriTeQ owed the Company $138,000 and $ 273,000, respectively, for shared services and working capital advances, for which no revenue has been recorded.

On July 8, 2013, the Company entered into a letter agreement with VeriTeQ which amended certain terms of the SSA, the APA, and the Secured Promissory Note dated January 11, 2012. The letter agreement effectively terminates the SSA, including a payment of $63,000 toward the current outstanding balance for past shared services. The letter agreement also eliminates minimum royalties payable to PositiveID under the APA, with remedies for the Company to recover ownership or license of the underlying patents if VeriTeQ fails to meet certain sales levels. Further, the letter agreement amended the Secured Promissory Note, which has a current balance of $228,000, to include a conversion feature under which the Note may be repaid, at VeriTeQ’s option, in equity in lieu of cash.

License of iglucose

In February 15, 2013, the Company entered into an agreement the (“SGMC Agreement”) with SGMC, Easy Check, Easy-Check Medical Diagnostic Technologies Ltd., an Israeli company, and Benjamin Atkin, an individual (“Atkin”), pursuant to which the Company licensed its iglucose™ technology to SGMC for up to $2 million based on potential future revenues of glucose test strips sold by SGMC. These revenues will range between $0.0025 and $0.005 per strip. A person with diabetes who tests three times per day will use over 1,000 strips per year.

Pursuant to the SGMC Agreement, the Company granted SGMC an exclusive right and license to the intellectual property rights in the iglucose patent applications; a non-exclusive right and license to use and make a “white label” version of the iglucose websites; a non-exclusive right and license to use all documents relating to the iglucose 510(k) application to the Food and Drug Administration of the United States Government; and an exclusive right and license to the iglucose trademark. The Company has also agreed to transfer to SGMC all right, title, and interest in the www.iglucose.com and www.iglucose.net domain names.

In consideration for the rights and licenses discussed above, and the transfer of the domain names, SGMC shall pay to the Company the amount set forth below for each glucose test strip sold by SGMC and any sublicensees of SGMC for which results are posted by SGMC via its communications servers (the “Consideration”):

(i)

$0.0025 per strip sold until SGMC has paid aggregate Consideration of $1,000,000; and

(ii)

$0.005 per strip sold thereafter until SGMC has paid aggregate Consideration of $2,000,000; provided, however, that the aggregate Consideration payable by SGMC pursuant to the SGMC Agreement shall in no event exceed $2,000,000.

POSITIVEID CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

4. Financing Agreements

Optimus Financing

On September 29, 2009, the Company entered into a Convertible Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Optimus Purchase Agreement”) with Optimus Technology Capital Partners, LLC (“Optimus”) under which Optimus was committed to purchase up to $10 million shares of convertible Series A Preferred Stock of the Company in one or more tranches.

To facilitate the transactions contemplated by the Optimus Purchase Agreement, R & R Consulting Partners, LLC (“R&R”), a company controlled by Scott R. Silverman, the Company’s former chairman and chief executive officer, loaned shares of common stock of the Company to Optimus equal to 135% of the aggregate purchase price for each tranche pursuant to stock loan agreements between R & R and Optimus. R & R was paid a $100,000 fee in October 2009 and was to be paid 2% as interest for the fair value of the loaned shares for entering into the stock loan arrangement. R & R could demand return of some or all of the borrowed shares (or an equal number of freely tradable shares of common stock) at any time on or after the six-month anniversary date such borrowed shares were loaned to Optimus, but no such demand could be made if there are any shares of Series A Preferred Stock then outstanding. If a permitted return demand was made, Optimus was required to return the borrowed shares (or an equal number of freely tradable shares of common stock) within three trading days after such demand. Optimus could return the borrowed shares in whole or in part, at any time or from time to time, without penalty or premium. On September 29, 2009, October 8, 2009, and October 21, 2009, R & R loaned Optimus 52,000, 32,000 and 24,000 shares, respectively, of Company common stock.

On September 29, 2009, the Company exercised the first tranche of the Optimus financing, pursuant to which it issued 296 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, for a purchase price of approximately $3.0 million. In support of this tranche, R & R loaned Optimus 52,000 shares of common stock. The tranche closed on October 13, 2009, and the Company received proceeds of approximately $3.0 million, less the fees due on the entire financing commitment of $800,000. On November 5, 2009, the Company closed the second tranche of this financing, issuing 166 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, for a purchase price of approximately $1.7 million. In support of this tranche, R & R loaned Optimus approximately 56,000 shares of common stock.

On May 12, 2010, R & R demanded the return of 108,000 shares loaned to Optimus. Also on May 12, 2010, the Company sent Optimus a notice of its election to convert all of the outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock into 109,178 shares of Company common stock. Optimus returned these shares to R & R in repayment of the loan. The conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock was determined by a fixed conversion price that was determined at the time of the two tranche closings, which were approximately $76.75 and $40 per share, respectively. The Company was required to issue make-whole shares to Optimus equal to 35% of the Series A Liquidation Value ($10,000 per share of Series A Preferred Stock) because the Series A Preferred Stock was redeemed prior the first anniversary of the issuance date. On October 13, 2010, the Company filed a Certificate of Elimination with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware effecting the elimination of the Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series A Preferred Stock. No shares of Series A Preferred Stock remained outstanding as of December 31, 2010.

On March 14, 2011, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Convertible Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Amended Optimus Purchase Agreement”) with Optimus. The Amended Optimus Purchase Agreement amended and restated the Optimus Purchase Agreement, and, among other things, specifically (i) replaced the Series A Preferred Stock issuable under the Purchase Agreement with Series C Preferred Stock with substantially similar terms, and (ii) reduced the maximum amount of preferred stock issuable to Optimus under the Optimus Purchase Agreement from $10 million to $8.7 million, of which $4.7 million was previously issued in 2009 as described above.

Under the terms of the Amended Optimus Purchase Agreement, from time to time and at the Company’s sole discretion, the Company could present Optimus with a notice to purchase shares of Series C Preferred Stock (the “Notice”). Optimus was obligated to purchase such Series C Preferred Stock on the twentieth trading day after any Notice date, subject to satisfaction of certain closing conditions, including (i) that the Company is listed for and trading on a trading market, such as the Nasdaq or the over the counter bulletin board, (ii) the representations and warranties of the Company set forth in the Amended Optimus Purchase Agreement are true and correct as if made on each tranche date, and (iii) that no such purchase would result in Optimus and its affiliates beneficially owning more than 9.99% of the Company’s common stock. In the event the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock during any one or more of the nineteen trading days following the delivery of a Notice were to fall below 75% of the closing bid price on the trading day prior to the Notice date and Optimus determined not to complete the tranche closing, then the Company could, at its option, proceed to issue some or all of the applicable shares, provided that the conversion price for the Preferred Stock that is issued would reset at the lowest closing bid price for such nineteen trading day period.

POSITIVEID CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

On March 14, 2011, the Company delivered a Notice to Optimus to sell 140 shares of Series C Preferred Stock for a purchase price of approximately $1.4 million. In support of this tranche, R & R loaned 109,178 shares, Mr. Silverman loaned 2,822 shares and William Caragol, the Company’s current chairman and chief executive officer, loaned 28,000 shares of Company common stock to Optimus (the “Loaned Shares”). On April 12, 2011, the tranche closed and the Company received proceeds of approximately $1.4 million, less $100,000 paid to Optimus to waive the requirement under the Amended Optimus Purchase Agreement that the conversion price of the Series C Preferred Stock issued in the tranche be reset at the lowest closing bid price for the nineteen trading days following the tranche notice date, which was March 14, 2011, due to the closing bid price of a share of the Company’s common stock falling below 75% during such nineteen trading day period.

On October 12, 2011, R & R, Mr. Caragol and Mr. Silverman demanded the return of the Loaned Shares from Optimus. Also on October 12, 2011, the Company sent Optimus a notice of its election to convert all of the outstanding shares of Series C Preferred Stock into 140,000 shares of common stock. The conversion of the Series C Preferred Stock was determined by a fixed conversion price that was determined at the time of the tranche closing, which was approximately $10 per share. On October 17, 2011, Optimus failed to return the Loaned Shares within three trading days of the demand by R & R, Mr. Silverman and Mr. Caragol as required under the terms of the Amended Optimus Purchase Agreement. No shares of Series C Preferred Stock remained outstanding as of December 31, 2012 and 2011.

On January 27, 2012, the Company issued an aggregate of 140,000 shares of common stock to R & R, Mr. Silverman and Mr. Caragol in exchange for the Loaned Shares. The securities that were originally issued upon conversion remain outstanding but have no voting, dividend, distribution or other rights of common stockholders. Further, Optimus has indicated in a public filing the absence of beneficial ownership of the 140,000 shares of common stock. The Company believes that, while the transfer agent has not yet cancelled the original 140,000 shares, no requirements exist that legally prevent such cancellation from being effectuated.

The Company believes that the transactions undertaken with Optimus as discussed herein were in compliance with applicable securities laws at the time of the financing transactions, including Section 5 of the Securities Act. If a violation did occur in connection with Optimus' resale of the common stock it received in connection with these financings, security holders who purchased these securities would have certain remedies available to them, including the right to rescind the purchase of those securities within the applicable statute of limitations, which under the Securities Act is one year commencing on the date of violation of the federal registration requirements. The Company believes that the federal statute of limitations on sales of shares of the Company’s common stock has expired for sales made under the 2009 Optimus transactions, and that the federal statute of limitations on sales of shares of the Company’s common stock expired in 2012 for sales made under the March 2011 Optimus transaction. Statutes of limitations under state laws vary by state, with the limitation time period under many state statutes not typically beginning until the facts giving rise to a violation are known. The Company is applying a contingency accounting model in determining whether a liability exists for this matter. Under this model, the Company evaluates whether a violation of the applicable securities laws has occurred resulting in a rescission right and whether a claim for a potential violation will be asserted. The Company has determined that there is a remote likelihood as to whether a violation has occurred. If the Company were required to pay security holders for rescission of their purchase of such securities, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. The Company is not presently able to accurately determine an estimated amount for any potential rescission liability associated with the resale of the loaned shares by Optimus in the event that the transaction were to be found to violate Section 5 of the Securities Act as it does not have knowledge of the amount and timing of such resales, nor information regarding the state or states in which such resales may have occurred. The Company believes that the range of prices at which Optimus sold the loaned shares was between $12.5-$80.5 per share related to the 2009 Optimus transactions and between $2.75-$15.75 per share related to the 2011 Optimus transaction. No adjustment has been made in the accompanying consolidated financial statements related to the outcome of this contingency. As of June 30, 2013, no shares of Series C Preferred Stock were outstanding.

Ironridge 2011 Common Stock Purchase Agreement

On July 27, 2011, the Company entered into a Common Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Common Stock Agreement”) with Ironridge Global Technology under which the Company could deliver a notice to Ironridge Global Technology exercising its right to require Ironridge Global Technology to purchase shares up to $2.5 million of its common stock at a price per share equal to $9.175. The purchase price was equal to 102% of the per share closing bid price of the Company’s common stock as reported on a public market on the trading day immediately before the date the Company announced that it entered into the Common Stock Agreement, which was July 27, 2011.

POSITIVEID CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Ironridge Global Technology could pay the purchase price for the shares, at Ironridge Global Technology’s option, in cash or a secured promissory note, except that at least $250,000 of the purchase price was required to be paid in cash. The promissory note bears interest at 1.6% per year calculated on a simple interest basis. The entire principal balance and interest thereon is due and payable seven and one-half years from the date of the promissory note, but no payments are due so long as the Company is in default under the Common Stock Agreement or the Series F Agreement (defined below) or if there are any shares of Series F Preferred Stock issued or outstanding. The promissory note is secured by Ironridge Global Technology’s right, title and interest in all shares legally or beneficially owned by Ironridge or an affiliate, common stock and other securities with a fair market value equal to the principal amount of the promissory note.

The Company’s right to deliver a tranche notice to Ironridge Global Technology pursuant to the Common Stock Agreement was subject to satisfaction of certain closing conditions, including (i) that the Company’s common stock is listed and trading on a trading market, (ii) no uncured default exists under the Common Stock Agreement, and (iii) the Company’s representations and warranties set forth in the common Stock Agreement are true and correct in all material respects. The Company could not deliver a notice to Global Technology to purchase shares of its common stock if the total number of shares of common stock owned or deemed beneficially owned by Ironridge Global Technology and its affiliates would result in Ironridge Global Technology owning or being deemed to beneficially own more than 9.99% of all such common stock and other voting securities as would be outstanding on the date of exercise.

On July 28, 2011, the Company presented Ironridge Global Technology with a notice to purchase $2.5 million of its common stock under the Common Stock Agreement. Ironridge paid $250,000 in cash and the remaining $2.25 million in a promissory note, the terms of which are described above. The Company issued an aggregate of 272,480 shares of its common stock to Ironridge Global Technology in connection with the July 28, 2011 notice. No further shares may be sold under the Common Stock Agreement. In connection with the conversion of 1,324 shares of Series F Preferred Stock during 2012 (discussed below), a total of $1.9 million of the promissory note was repaid. The remaining $264,000 of the promissory note was repaid during early 2013 in connection with the conversion of 376 shares of Series F Preferred Stock (discussed below).

Ironridge Series F Preferred Stock Financing

On July 27, 2011, the Company also entered into a Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Series F Agreement”) with Ironridge Global III, LLC (“Ironridge Global”), under which Ironridge Global was committed to purchase for cash up to $1.5 million in shares of the Company’s redeemable, convertible Series F Preferred Stock (the “Series F Preferred Stock”) at $1,000 per share of Series F Preferred Stock. The Series F Preferred Stock is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at the option of the holder at a fixed conversion price of $12.5 per common share. The conversion price if the Company elects to convert the Series F Preferred Stock is subject to adjustment based on the market price of the Company's common stock and any applicable early redemption price at the time the Company converts.

Ironridge Global's obligation to purchase the Series F Preferred Stock was subject to satisfaction of certain closing conditions, including (i) that the Company’s common stock is listed and trading on a trading market, (ii) no uncured default exists under the Series F Agreement, (iii) the Company’s representations and warranties set forth in the Series F Agreement are true and correct in all material respects; and (iv) the trading price of the Company’s common stock has not fallen below 70% of the closing price on the trading day immediately before the date it announced that it entered into the Series F Agreement (the “Condition”).

Under the terms of the Series F Agreement, as amended on August 12, 2011 (the “Waiver”), and from time to time and at the Company’s sole discretion, the Company may present Ironridge Global with a notice to purchase such Series F Preferred Stock. Upon receipt of a notice, Ironridge Global was obligated to purchase the Series F Preferred Stock in installments as follows: (i) $500,000 on August 15, 2011; (ii) $500,000 on the earlier of (1) 20 trading days after August 15, 2011 and (2) the number of trading days necessary for an aggregate of $2.0 million of the Company’s common stock to trade on a public market; and (iii) $500,000 on the earlier of (1) 20 trading days after the closing of the second tranche above, (2) the number of trading days necessary for an aggregate of $2.0 million of the Company’s common stock to trade on a public market subsequent to the closing of the second tranche above, and (3) September 26, 2011, with the requirement that cash for that tranche be received by the Company on or before September 30, 2011. On August 15, 2011, Ironridge Global funded the first $500,000 installment, pursuant to which the Company issued 500 shares of Series F Preferred Stock to Ironridge Global.

POSITIVEID CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

On September 16, 2011, the Company entered into a First Amendment to Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement (the “First Amendment”) with Ironridge Global, which superseded the Waiver. Pursuant to the First Amendment, Ironridge Global was obligated to purchase the Series F Preferred Stock in installments as follows: (1) 130 preferred shares on the trading day (“First Closing”) following the later of (i) 10 trading days after September 7, 2011 and (ii) the trading day that aggregate trading volume of the Company's common stock after September 7, 2011, as reported by Bloomberg, equals or exceeds $500,000; (2) 290 preferred shares on the trading day (“Second Closing”) the earlier of (i) 10 trading days after the First Closing and (ii) the trading day that aggregate trading volume of the Company's common stock after the First Closing, as reported by Bloomberg, equals or exceeds $1 million; (3) 290 preferred shares on the trading day (“Third Closing”) following the earlier of (i) 10 trading days after the Second Closing and (ii) the trading day that aggregate trading volume of the Company's common stock after the Second Closing, as reported by Bloomberg, equals or exceeds $1 million; and (4) 290 preferred shares on the trading day (“Fourth Closing”) following the earlier of (i) 10 trading days after the Third Closing and (ii) the trading day that aggregate trading volume of the Company's common stock after the Third Closing, as reported by Bloomberg, equals or exceeds $1 million (each of the First, Second, Third and Fourth Closings, a “Purchase Closing”). Each of the respective time periods between each Purchase Closing and the prior Purchase Closing shall be the respective “Calculation Period.”

Pursuant to the First Amendment, the price per preferred share with respect to the First Closing was equal to the lesser of: (a) $1,000; and (b) an amount, not below zero, equal to (i) $1,000, multiplied by (ii) 85% of the average of the VWAPs during the period between September 7, 2011 through the First Closing minus $5.00, divided by (iii) $1.425. The First Closing occurred on September 20, 2011, pursuant to which the Company issued 130 shares of Series F Preferred Stock to Ironridge Global for a nominal purchase price.

On November 14, 2011, the Second Closing occurred, pursuant to which the Company issued 290 shares of Series F Preferred Stock to Ironridge Global for a purchase price of approximately $193,000. On November 18, 2011, the Third Closing occurred, pursuant to which the Company issued 290 shares of Series F Preferred Stock to Ironridge Global for a purchase price of approximately $243,000. On December 5, 2011, the Fourth Closing occurred, pursuant to which the Company issued 290 shares of Series F Preferred Stock to Ironridge Global for a purchase price of approximately $188,000. Overall, the Company issued a total of 1,500 shares of Series F Preferred Stock to Ironridge Global under the Series F Agreement.

On July 12, 2012, the Company also entered into an agreement with Ironridge Technology Co., a division of Ironridge Global IV, Ltd. (“Ironridge,” and together with Ironridge Global Technology and Ironridge Global, the “Ironridge Entities”) pursuant to which 500 shares of Series F Preferred Stock were issued to Ironridge. The $500,000 value which represents the fair value of the preferred shares was recorded as a charge to stockholder’s equity.

On September 12, 2012, the Company also entered into an agreement with Ironridge pursuant to which 100 shares of Series F Preferred Stock were issued to Ironridge. The Series F Preferred Stock were issued as a waiver to satisfy any penalties resulting from the Company’s late delivery of shares under a conversion of Series F Preferred Stock by Ironridge. The $100,000 value, which represent the fair value of the preferred shares, was recorded as other expense in the statement of operations.

Through June 30, 2013, the Company has converted a total of 1,950 shares of Series F Preferred Stock, pursuant to which the Company issued a total of 7,109,751 shares of common stock to the Ironridge Entities. As of June 30, 2013 there were 150 shares of Series F Preferred Stock outstanding. Subsequent to June 30, 2013, 50 shares of Series Preferred Stock were converted into 1,039,742 shares of common stock.

In connection with the Series F conversions, the Company recorded beneficial conversion dividends during the three months ended June 30, 2013and 2012 totaling $1.1 and $ 2.9 respectively, and during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, totaling $4.5 million and $4.9 million, respectively, representing the excess of fair value of the Company’s common stock at the date of issuance of the converted Series F Preferred Stock over the effective conversion rate, multiplied by the common shares issued upon conversion.

Certificate of Designations for Series F Preferred Stock

On July 27, 2011, the Company filed a Certificate of Designations of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series F Preferred Stock with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. A summary of the Certificate of Designations is set forth below:

POSITIVEID CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Dividends and Other Distributions. Commencing on the date of issuance of any such shares of Series F Preferred Stock, holders of Series F Preferred Stock are entitled to receive dividends on each outstanding share of Series F Preferred Stock, which accrue in shares of Series F Preferred Stock at a rate equal to 7.65% per annum from the date of issuance. Accrued dividends are payable upon redemption of the Series F Preferred Stock.

Redemption. The Company may redeem the Series F Preferred Stock, for cash or by an offset against any outstanding note payable from Ironridge Global to the Company that Ironridge Global issued, as follows. The Company may redeem any or all of the Series F Preferred Stock at any time after the seventh anniversary of the issuance date at the redemption price per share equal to $1,000 per share of Series F Preferred Stock, plus any accrued but unpaid dividends with respect to such shares of Series F Preferred Stock (the “Series F Liquidation Value”). Prior to the seventh anniversary of the issuance of the Series F Preferred Stock, the Company may redeem the shares at any time after six months from the issuance date at a make-whole price per share equal to the following with respect to such redeemed Series F Preferred Stock: (i) 149.99% of the Series F Liquidation Value if redeemed prior to the first anniversary of the issuance date, (ii) 141.6% of the Series F Liquidation Value if redeemed on or after the first anniversary but prior to the second anniversary of the issuance date, (iii) 133.6% of the Series F Liquidation Value if redeemed on or after the second anniversary but prior to the third anniversary of the issuance date, (iv) 126.1% of the Series F Liquidation Value if redeemed on or after the third anniversary but prior to the fourth anniversary of the issuance date, (v) 119.0% of the Series F Liquidation Value if redeemed on or after the fourth anniversary but prior to the fifth anniversary of the issuance date, (vi) 112.3% of the Series F Liquidation Value if redeemed on or after the fifth anniversary but prior to the sixth anniversary of the issuance date, and (vii) 106.0% of the Series F Liquidation Value if redeemed on or after the sixth anniversary but prior to the seventh anniversary of the issuance date.

In addition, if the Company determines to liquidate, dissolve or wind-up its business, or engage in any deemed liquidation event, it must redeem the Series F Preferred Stock at the applicable early redemption price set forth above.

Conversion. The Series F Preferred Stock is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at the applicable Ironridge Entities option or at the Company’s option at any time after six months from the date of issuance of the Series F Preferred Stock. The fixed conversion price is equal to $12.50 per share which represented a premium of 32% over the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the trading day immediately before the date the Company announced the entry into the Series F Agreement (the “Series F Conversion Price”).

If an Ironridge Entity elects to convert, the Company will issue that number of shares of its common stock equal to the Series F Liquidation Value multiplied by the number of shares subject to conversion, divided by the Series F Conversion Price.

If the Company elects to convert the Series F Preferred Stock into common stock and the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock exceeds 150% of the Series F Conversion Price for any 20 consecutive trading days, the Company will issue that number of shares of its common stock equal to the early redemption price set forth above multiplied by the number of shares subject to conversion, divided by the Series F Conversion Price. If the Company elects to convert the Series F Preferred Stock into common stock and the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock is less than 150% of the Series F Conversion Price, the Company will issue an initial number of shares of its common stock equal to 130% of the early redemption price set forth above multiplied by the number of shares subject to conversion, divided by the lower of (i) the Series F Conversion Price and (ii) 100% of the closing bid price of a share of the Company’s common stock on the trading day immediately before the date of the conversion notice.

After 20 trading days, the Ironridge Entity shall return, or the Company shall issue, a number of conversion shares (the “Series F Reconciling Conversion Shares”), so that the total number of conversion shares under the conversion notice equals the early redemption price set forth above multiplied by the number of shares of subject to conversion, divided by the lower of (i) the Series F Conversion Price and (ii) 85% of the average of the daily volume-weighted average prices of the Company’s common stock for the 20 trading days following the Ironridge Entity’s receipt of the conversion notice. However, if the trading price of the Company’s common stock during any one or more of the 20 trading days following the Ironridge Entity’s receipt of the conversion notice falls below 70% of the closing bid price on the day prior to the date the Company gives notice of its intent to convert, the Ironridge Entity will return the Series F Reconciling Conversion Shares to the Company and the pro rata amount of the conversion notice will be deemed canceled.

The Company cannot issue any shares of common stock upon conversion of the Series F Preferred Stock if it would result in an Ironridge Entity being deemed to beneficially own, within the meaning of Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act, more than 9.99% of the total shares of common stock then outstanding. Furthermore, until stockholder approval is obtained or the holder obtains an opinion of counsel reasonably satisfactory to the Company and its counsel that such approval is not required, both the holder and the Company are prohibited from delivering a conversion notice if, as a result of such exercise, the aggregate number of shares of common stock to be issued, when aggregated with any common stock issued to holder or any affiliate of holder under any other agreements or arrangements between the Company and the holder or any applicable affiliate of the holder, such aggregate number would, under NASDAQ Marketplace rules (or the rules of any other exchange where the common stock is listed), exceed the Cap Amount (meaning 19.99% of the common stock outstanding on the date of the Series F Agreement). If delivery of a conversion notice is prohibited by the preceding sentence because the Cap Amount would be exceeded, the Company must, upon the written request of the holder, hold a meeting of its stockholders within sixty (60) days following such request, and use its best efforts to obtain the approval of its stockholders for the transactions described herein.

POSITIVEID CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

2012 Ironridge Series H Preferred Financing

On January 13, 2012, the Company, entered into a Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Series H Agreement”) with Ironridge, under which Ironridge was committed to purchase for cash $500,000 in shares of the Company’s redeemable, convertible Series H Preferred Stock (the “Series H Preferred Stock”) at $1,000 per share of Series H Preferred Stock.

Each share of Series H Preferred Stock was convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at any time by the holder at a conversion price of $3.75 per share. The Series H Preferred Stock accrued dividends in the amount of 4.5% per annum, subject to increase if the closing price of the Company’s common stock fell below $3.125 per share, up to a maximum rate of 10% per annum. The dividends were payable quarterly, at the Company’s option, in cash or shares of the Company’s common stock. The holder of the Series H Preferred Stock could have converted the Series H Preferred Stock into shares of the Company’s common stock at any time at an initial conversion price of $3.75 per share plus a make-whole adjustment equal to accrued but unpaid dividends and dividends that otherwise would be due through the 10th anniversary of the Series H Preferred Stock. The Company could have converted the Series H Preferred Stock if the closing price of the Company’s common stock exceeded 200% of the conversion price, and certain other conditions were met. The holder was prohibited, however, from converting the Series H Preferred Stock into shares of the Company’s common stock if, as a result of such conversion, the holder together with its affiliates, would have owned more than 9.99% of the total number of shares of the Company’s common stock then issued and outstanding.

On January 17, 2012, Ironridge funded the $500,000 purchase price, pursuant to which the Company issued 500 shares of Series H Preferred Stock to Ironridge. Through December 31, 2012, Ironridge had converted all 500 shares of Series H Preferred Stock, pursuant to which the Company issued a total of 589,016 shares of common stock to Ironridge. In connection with the conversions, the Company recorded a total of $1.7 million of beneficial conversion dividend in 2012, representing the excess of the fair value of the Company’s common stock at the date of issuance of the converted Series H Preferred Stock over the effective conversion rate, multiplied by the common shares issued upon conversion. As of June 30, 2013, no shares of Series H Preferred Stock were outstanding.

Certificate of Designations for Series H Preferred Stock

On January 12, 2012, the Company filed a Certificate of Designations of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series H Preferred Stock (the “Series H Certificate of Designations”) with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware and the number of shares so designated is 500, par value $0.001 per share, which shall not be subject to increase without the consent of the holders of the Series H Preferred Stock. A summary of the Series H Certificate of Designations is set forth below:

Dividends and Other Distributions. Commencing on the date of issuance of any such shares of Series H Preferred Stock, holders of Series H Preferred Stock are entitled to receive quarterly dividends on each outstanding share of Series H Preferred Stock, which are payable, at the Company’s option, in cash or shares of the Company’s common stock at a rate equal to 4.5% per annum from the date of issuance. Accrued dividends are payable on the last business day of each calendar quarter and upon redemption of the Series H Preferred Stock. The dividend rate will adjust upward by 98.2350 basis points for each $0.01 that the price of the Company’s common stocks falls below $3.125 per share, up to a maximum rate of 10% per annum.

Conversion. The Series H Preferred Stock is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at holder's option at any time from the date of issuance of the Series H Preferred Stock. If the holder elects to convert, the Company will issue that number of shares of its common stock equal to the Early Redemption Price, as defined below, multiplied by the number of shares subject to conversion, divided by the conversion price of $3.75 (“Series H Conversion Price”). There are no resets, ratchets or anti-dilution provisions that adjust the Series H Conversion Price other than the customary adjustments for stock splits.

POSITIVEID CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

The Company may convert the Series H Preferred Stock into common stock if the closing price of the Company’s common stock exceeds 200% of the Series H Conversion Price for any consecutive 20 trading days and certain equity conditions are met.

Upon such conversion, the Company will issue that number of shares of the Company’s common stock equal to the Early Redemption Price, as defined below, multiplied by the number of shares subject to conversion, divided by the Series H Conversion Price.

Redemption. The Company may redeem any or all of the Series H Preferred Stock for cash at any time after the tenth anniversary of the issuance date at the redemption price per share (the “Series H Redemption Price”), equal to $1,000 per share of Series H Preferred Stock, plus any accrued but unpaid dividends with respect to such shares of Series H Preferred Stock (the “Series H Liquidation Value”). Prior to the tenth anniversary of the issuance of the Series H Preferred Stock, the Company may, at its option, redeem the shares at any time after the issuance date at a price per share equal to the Series H Liquidation Value plus the total cumulative amount of dividends that otherwise would have been payable through the tenth anniversary of the issuance date, less any dividends that have been paid (the “Early Redemption Price”).

In addition, if the Company determines to liquidate, dissolve or wind-up the Company’s business, or engage in any liquidation event, it must redeem the Series H Preferred Stock at the applicable Early Redemption Price.

The Company cannot issue any shares of common stock upon conversion of the Series H Preferred Stock if it would result in the holder being deemed to beneficially own, within the meaning of Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act, more than 9.99% of the total shares of common stock then outstanding.

Ironridge's obligation to purchase the Series H Preferred Stock was subject to satisfaction of certain closing conditions, including (i) that the Company’s common stock is listed for and trading on a trading market, (ii) no uncured default exists under the Series H Agreement, and (iii) the Company’s representations and warranties set forth in the Series H Agreement are true and correct in all material respects.

2012 Ironridge Securities Purchase Agreement

On January 13, 2012, the Company also entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) with Ironridge whereby Ironridge agreed to purchase up to $10 million of shares of the Company’s common stock from time to time over a 24-month period. Under the terms of the Securities Purchase Agreement, Ironridge was not obligated to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock unless and until certain conditions were met, including but not limited to the SEC declaring effective a Registration Statement (the “First Ironridge Registration Statement”) on Form S-1 and the Company maintaining an effective First Ironridge Registration Statement which registers Ironridge’s resale of any shares purchased by it under the facility, including the Commitment Fee Shares and Success Fee Shares (each as defined in the Securities Purchase Agreement). The customary terms and conditions associated with Ironridge’s registration rights were set forth in a Registration Rights Agreement that was also entered into by the parties on January 13, 2012. As the First Ironridge Registration Statement never went effective, the Securities Purchase Agreement was terminated on April 26, 2012. It was replaced by an agreement that was substantially equivalent (see the Stock Purchase Agreement below).

On July 12, 2012, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”) with Ironridge whereby Ironridge agreed to purchase up to $10 million of shares of the Company’s common stock from time to time over a 24-month period. Under the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, Ironridge was not obligated to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock unless and until certain conditions were met, including but not limited to the Company maintaining an effective Registration Statement (the “Second Ironridge Registration Statement”) on Form S-1which registers Ironridge’s resale of any shares purchased by it under the facility, including the Commitment Fee Shares (as defined below). The customary terms and conditions associated with Ironridge’s registration rights are set forth in a Registration Rights Agreement that was also entered into by the parties on July 12, 2012 (the “Second Ironridge Registration Rights Agreement”).

On August 13, 2012, the Second Ironridge Registration Statement was declared effective by the SEC. Fifteen (15) trading days after the Second Ironridge Registration Statement was declared effective, the Company had the right to sell and issue to Ironridge, and Ironridge was obligated to purchase from the Company, up to $10 million of shares of the Company’s common stock over a 24-month period beginning on such date (the “Commitment Period”). Ironridge did continuous drawdowns of 80,000 shares under the facility until the Company sent a notice suspending the draw down notice. The draw down pricing period was the number of consecutive trading days necessary for 240,000 shares of the Company’s stock to trade. Only one draw down was allowed in each draw down pricing period. The purchase price for the shares was 90% of the average of the daily VWAP on each trading day during the draw down pricing period preceding such current draw down pricing period, not to exceed the arithmetic average of any three daily VWAPs during the draw down pricing period preceding such current draw down pricing period. For purposes of a recommencement following a suspension, the purchase price was the lower of the foregoing and the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the trading day prior to the recommencement date; and for purposes of the first draw down the purchase price meant the VWAP for the 15 consecutive trading days after the effective date of the Second Ironridge Registration Statement. The Company delivered the shares sold to Ironridge by the third trading day following the draw down pricing period. Ironridge was entitled to liquidated damages in connection with certain delays in the delivery of any draw down shares. The Stock Purchase Agreement also provided for a commitment fee to Ironridge of 120,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Commitment Fee Shares”). The Company issued 1,000,000 shares to Ironridge under the equity line during 2012 (inclusive of the commitment shares), for which it received $379,220 in proceeds. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company issued 360,000 shares under the equity line and had received $153,040 in proceeds. At June 30, 2013, all shares previously registered had been issued. While shares of our common stock may be issuable to the Ironridge Entities upon conversion of the Series F Preferred Stock, no more sales can be made under our previous equity line with the Ironridge Entities.

POSITIVEID CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Convertible Note Financings

On August 14, 2012, the Company entered into a financing arrangement pursuant to which it may borrow up to $400,000 in convertible, unsecured debt, at the discretion of the lender. The Company issued a promissory note in favor of a lender with a principal sum of $445,000 (with a $45,000 original issue discount). The debt is to be issued at a 10% discount, matures twelve months from the date funded, has a one time 10% interest charge if not paid within 90 days, and is convertible at the option of the lender into shares of the Company’s common stock at the lesser of $0.50 per share or 75% of the lowest closing price in the 25 trading days prior to conversion. The note might be accelerated if an event of default occurs under the terms of the note, including the Company’s failure to pay principal and interest when due, certain bankruptcy events or if the Company is delinquent in its SEC filings.

On August 15, 2012, the Company borrowed an initial $100,000 under the arrangement, in connection with which it issued to the lender immediately exercisable warrants to purchase 111,111 shares of common stock at an initial exercise price of $0.45 per share. Debt was recorded at a discount in the amount of $32,888, representing the relative fair value of the warrants. The debt shall accrete in value over its one year term to its face value of approximately $111,000. Additionally, a liability of $49,000 has been recorded as the fair value of the warrant as a result of a down round adjustment to the exercise price of the warrants. In connection with the issuance of the $100,000 note there is a beneficial conversion feature of approximately $25,000, which will be amortized over the one year term of the note. As of June 30, 2013, the Company has issued an aggregate of 421,656 shares of common stock to convert the face value of the promissory note. All related debt discount and beneficial conversion feature were fully amortized in conjunction with the conversion of the note.

On November 8, 2012, the Company borrowed an additional $100,000 under the agreement, in connection with which it issued the lender immediately exercisable warrants to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at an initial exercise price of $0.50 per share. As an inducement to enter into the loan the Company issued the lender 74,000 shares of common stock with a fair value of $37,925 at the time of issuance, which will be amortized over the one year life of the note. The debt was recorded at a discount in the amount of $32,683, representing the relative fair value of the warrants. The debt shall accrete in value over its one year term to its face value of approximately $110,000. Additionally, a liability of $49,000 has been recorded as the fair value of the warrant as a result of a down round adjustment to the exercise price of the warrants. In connection with the issuance of the $100,000 note there is a beneficial conversion feature of approximately $25,000, which will be amortized over the one year term of the note. As of June 30, 2013, the Company has issued an aggregate of 260,000 shares of common stock to convert $42,600 of the convertible promissory note pursuant to the financing arrangement. The amortization expense recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 was approximately $24,000 and $47,000 and the Company recorded an additional $22,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 to reflect an acceleration of cost of debt, the beneficial conversion feature and debt discount amortization in conjunction with the conversion.

On February 27, 2013, the Company borrowed an additional $75,000 under the agreement, in connection with which it issued the lender immediately exercisable warrants to purchase 68,182 shares of common stock at an initial exercise price of $0.55 per share. The debt was recorded at a discount in the amount of $28,125, representing the relative fair value of the warrants. The debt shall accrete in value over its one year term to its face value of approximately $82,500. Additionally, a liability of $35,687 has been recorded as the fair value of the warrant as a result of a down round adjustment to the exercise price of the warrants. In connection with the issuance of the $75,000 note there is a beneficial conversion feature of approximately $18,750, which will be amortized over the one year term of the note. The amortization expense recorded for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 was approximately $12,000.

POSITIVEID CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

On June 4, 2013, the Company borrowed an additional $50,000 under the agreement, in connection with which it issued the lender immediately exercisable warrants to purchase 104,167 shares of common stock at an initial exercise price of $0.24 per share. The debt was recorded at a discount in the amount of $23,684, representing the relative fair value of the warrants. The debt shall accrete in value over its one year term to its face value of approximately $55,000. Additionally, a liability of $23,223 has been recorded as the fair value of the warrant as a result of a down round adjustment to the exercise price of the warrants. In connection with the issuance of the $50,000 note there is a beneficial conversion feature of approximately $12,500, which will be amortized over the one year term of the note. The amortization expense recorded for the quarter ended June 30, 2013 was approximately $2,400.

On July 3, 2013, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement for a new convertible promissory note (the " Purchase Agreement"). Pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Agreement the investor committed to purchase an 8% Convertible Promissory Note (the "Note") in the principal amount of $78,500 (together with any note(s) issued in replacement thereof or as a dividend thereon or otherwise with respect thereto in accordance with the terms thereof, the “Note”), convertible into shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, of the Company (the “Common Stock”), upon the terms and subject to the limitations and conditions set forth in such Note. Interest shall commence accruing on the date that the Note is issued and shall be computed on the basis of a 365-day year and the actual number of days elapsed. The lender may convert the Note into common shares of stock at a 42% discount to the price of common shares in the ten days prior to conversion.

Debenture Financing

Effective as of January 16, 2013, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “TCA Purchase Agreement”) with TCA Global Credit Master Fund, LP, a Cayman Islands limited partnership (“TCA”), pursuant to which TCA may purchase from the Company up to $5,000,000 senior secured, convertible, redeemable debentures (the “Debentures”). A $550,000 Debenture was purchased by TCA on January 16, 2013 (the “First Debenture”).

The maturity date of the First Debenture is January 16, 2014, subject to adjustment (the “Maturity Date”). The First Debenture bears interest at a rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum. The Company additionally pays a 7% premium on all scheduled principal payments. The Company, at its option, may repay the principal, interest, fees and expenses due under the Debenture with no penalty or premium and in full and for cash, at any time prior to the Maturity Date, with three (3) business days advance written notice to the holder. At any time while the Debenture is outstanding, but only upon the occurrence of an event of default under the TCA Purchase Agreement or any other transaction documents, the holder may convert all or any portion of the outstanding principal, accrued and unpaid interest, redemption premium and any other sums due and payable under the First Debenture or any other transaction document (such total amount, the “Conversion Amount”) into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to (i) the Conversion Amount divided by (ii) eighty-five (85%) of the average daily volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock during the five (5) trading days immediately prior to the date of conversion. The Debenture also contains a provision whereby TCA may not own more than 4.99% of the Company’s common stock at any one time.

As consideration for entering into the TCA Purchase Agreement, the Company paid to TCA (i) a transaction advisory fee in the amount of $22,000, (ii) a due diligence fee equal to $10,000, and (iii) document review and legal fees in the amount of $12,500.

As further consideration, the Company agreed to issue to TCA that number of shares of the Company’s common stock that equals $100,000 (the “Incentive Shares”). For purposes of determining the number of Incentive Shares issuable to TCA, the Company’s common stock was valued at the volume weighted average price for the five (5) trading days immediately prior to the date of the TCA Purchase Agreement, as reported by Bloomberg, 191,388 shares were issued. It is the intention of the Company and TCA that the value of the Incentive Shares shall equal $100,000. In the event the value of the Incentive Shares issued to TCA does not equal $100,000 after a twelve month evaluation date, the TCA Purchase Agreement provides for an adjustment provision allowing for necessary action (either the issuance of additional shares to TCA or the return of shares previously issued to TCA to the Company’s treasury). Any adjustment necessary related to the Incentive Shares will be recorded at the twelve month evaluation date. Had the Incentive Shares been remeasured at June 30, 2013, the Company would have owed an additional 475,328 shares based on the share price at June 30, 2013. Additionally, the Company paid a broker fee consisting of $22,000 and 52,632 shares of its common stock for arranging this financing. Such fee was recorded as a cost of capital, or reduction to stockholder’s equity.

POSITIVEID CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

In connection with the TCA Purchase Agreement, the Company entered into a Security Agreement (the “TCA Security Agreement”) with TCA. As security for the Company’s obligations to TCA under the Debentures, the TCA Purchase Agreement and any other transaction document, the TCA Security Agreement grants to TCA a continuing, second priority security interest in all of the Company’s assets and property, wheresoever located and whether now existing or hereafter arising or acquired. This security interest is subordinate to the security interest of The Boeing Company (“Boeing”), who has a secured interest supporting that certain Boeing License Agreement (defined below). (See Note 9)

On March 18, 2013, the Company entered into an Intercreditor and Non-Disturbance Agreement (the “Intercreditor Agreement”) among PositiveID and MFS; VeriGreen Energy Corporation, Steel Vault Corporation, IFTH NY Sub, Inc., and IFTH NJ Sub, Inc. Boeing, and TCA. The Intercreditor Agreement sets forth the agreement of Boeing and TCA as to their respective rights and obligations with respect to the Boeing Collateral (as described below) and the TCA Collateral (as described below) and their understanding relative to their respective positions in the Boeing Collateral and the TCA Collateral.

The “Boeing Collateral” includes, among other things, all Intellectual Property Rights (as defined in the Intercreditor Agreement) in the M-BAND Technology (as defined in the Intercreditor Agreement), including without limitation certain patents and patent applications set forth in the Intercreditor Agreement. The TCA Collateral includes any and all property and assets of PositiveID. The liens of Boeing on the Boeing Collateral are senior and prior in right to the liens of TCA on the Boeing Collateral and such liens of TCA on the Boeing Collateral are junior and subordinate to the liens of Boeing on the Boeing Collateral.

In July 2013 the Company and TCA reached a verbal agreement to defer the July and August principal payments until the first half of 2014. In exchange for this principal holiday the Company and TCA agreed to increase the outstanding principal balance by $80,000. The parties are in the process of documenting this agreement. Completion of the agreement will result in an outstanding principal balance owed to TCA of $416,544 as of June 30, 2013.

Equity Line Financing

On May 10, 2013, the Company entered into an investment agreement (“Investment Agreement”) and a registration rights agreement (“RRA”) with IBC Funds LLC (“IBC”), a Nevada limited liability company. Pursuant to the terms of the Investment Agreement, IBC committed to purchase up to $5,000,000 of the Company’s common stock over a period of up to thirty-six (36) months. From time to time during the thirty-six (36) month period commencing on the day immediately following the effectiveness of the IBC Registration Statement (defined below), the Company may deliver a drawdown notice to IBC which states the dollar amount that the Company intends to sell to IBC on a date specified in the drawdown notice. The maximum investment amount per notice shall be equal to two hundred percent (200%) of the average daily volume of the common stock for the ten consecutive trading days immediately prior to date of the applicable drawdown notice so long as such amount does not exceed 4.99% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. The purchase price per share to be paid by IBC shall be calculated at a twenty percent (20%) discount to the average of the three lowest prices of the Company’s common stock during the ten (10) consecutive trading days immediately prior to the receipt by IBC of the drawdown notice. Additionally, the Investment Agreement provides for a commitment fee to IBC of 104,000 shares of the Company's common stock (the “IBC Commitment Shares”). The IBC Commitment Shares were issued May 10, 2013. Such commitment shares were recorded as a cost of capital, or reduction of shareholder’s equity when issued.

Pursuant to the RRA, the Company is obligated to file a registration statement (the “IBC Registration Statement”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission covering the shares of its common stock underlying the Investment Agreement, including the IBC Commitment Shares, within 21 days after the closing of the transaction. Such IBC Registration Statement was filed on May 10, 2013.

On May 10, 2013, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with IBC whereby IBC agreed to purchase 40,064, shares of common stock for $12,500. The proceeds of the sale of the shares will be used to fund the Company’s legal expenses associated with the Investment Agreement. These shares were included in the IBC Registration Statement filed May 10, 2013.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, the Company issued 1,091,425shares to IBC under the equity line (inclusive of the commitment shares), for which it received $146,524 in proceeds.

POSITIVEID CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Other Financings

On July 9, 2012, the Company issued a Secured Promissory Note (the “H&K Note”) in the principal amount of $849,510 to Holland & Knight LLP (“Holland & Knight”), its external legal counsel, in support of amounts due and owing to Holland & Knight as of June 30, 2012. The H&K Note is non-interest bearing, and principal on the H&K Note is due and payable as soon as practicably possible by the Company. The Company has agreed to remit payment against the H&K Note immediately upon each occurrence of any of the following events: (a) completion of an acquisition or disposition of any of the Company’s assets or stock or any of the Company’s subsidiaries’ assets or stock with gross proceeds in excess of $750,000, (b) completion of any financing with gross proceeds in excess of $1,500,000, (c) receipt of any revenue in excess of $750,000 from the licensing or development of any of the Company’s or the Company’s subsidiaries’ products, or (d) any liquidation or reorganization of the Company’s assets or liabilities. The amount of payment to be remitted by the Company shall equal one-third of the gross proceeds received by the Company upon each occurrence of any of the above events, until the principal is repaid in full. If the Company receives $3,000,000 in gross proceeds in any one financing or licensing arrangement, the entire principal balance shall be paid in full. The H&K Note was secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets pursuant to a security agreement between the Company and Holland & Knight dated July 9, 2012. In conjunction with the TCA Purchase Agreement and the Boeing License Agreement (defined below), Holland & Knight agreed to terminate its security interest. As of June 30, 2013, the Company had repaid $250,000 of the H&K Note.

On September 7, 2012, the Company issued a Secured Promissory Note (the “Caragol Note”) in the principal amount of $200,000 to William J. Caragol (“Caragol”), the Company’s chairman and chief executive officer, in connection with a $200,000 loan to the Company by Caragol. The Caragol Note accrues interest at a rate of 5% per annum, and principal and interest on the Caragol Note are due and payable on September 6, 2013. The Company agreed to accelerate the repayment of principal and interest in the event that the Company raises at least $1,500,000 from any combination of equity sales, strategic agreements, or other loans, with no prepayment penalty for any paydown prior to maturity. The Caragol Note was secured by a subordinated security interest in substantially all of the assets of the Company pursuant to a Security Agreement between the Company and Caragol dated September 7, 2012 (the “Caragol Security Agreement”). The Caragol Note may be accelerated if an event of default occurs under the terms of the Caragol Note or the Caragol Security Agreement, or upon the insolvency, bankruptcy, or dissolution of the Company. In December, 2012, the Company has paid $100,000 of the principal amount of the Caragol Note and all accrued interest owed on the date of payment on December 18, 2012. In conjunction with the TCA Purchase Agreement and the Boeing License Agreement (defined below), Caragol agreed to terminate his security interest, effective January 16, 2013. As of June 30, 2013, the outstanding principal and interest on the Caragol Note was $102,695.

On June 5, 2013, the Company entered into a Settlement and Agreement and Release (the “Settlement Agreement”) with IBC Funds, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company (“IBC”) pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue common stock to in exchange for the settlement of $214,535(the “Settlement Amount”) of past-due accounts payable of the Company. IBC purchased the accounts payable from certain vendors of the Company, pursuant to the terms of separate receivable purchase agreements between IBC and each of such vendors (the “Assigned Accounts”). The Assigned Accounts relate to certain legal, accounting, and financial services provided to the Company. The Settlement Agreement became effective and binding upon the Company and IBC upon execution of the Order by the Court on June 7, 2013.

Pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement approved by the Order, on June 7, 2013, the Company agreed to issue to IBC shares (the “Settlement Shares”) of the Company’s common stock, $0.001 par value (the “Common Stock”). The Settlement Agreement provides that the Settlement Shares will be issued in one or more tranches, as necessary, sufficient to satisfy the Settlement Amount through the issuance of freely trading securities issued pursuant to Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, IBC may deliver a request to the Company which states the dollar amount (designated in U.S. Dollars) of Common Stock to be issued to IBC (the “Share Request”). The parties agree that the total amount of Common Stock to be delivered by the Company to satisfy the Share Request shall be issued at a thirty percent (30%) discount to market based upon the average of the volume weighted average price of the Common Stock over the three (3) trading day period preceding the Share Request. Additional tranche requests shall be made as requested by IBC until the Settlement Amount is paid in full so long as the number of shares requested does not make IBC the owner of more than 4.99% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock at any given time. The Company has recorded a charge of $91,944 in the quarter ended June 30, 2013 representing the total cost to the company for settling the $214,535 claim by issuing shares of common stock at a 30% discount. During the three months ended June 30, 2013, $50,000 of the settlement amount was converted into 376,789 shares of common stock.

Based on the market price of the Company’s common stock on June 30, 2013 and applying the 30% discount. 1,566,998 shares would be issuable relating to the common stock payable balance of $235,050.

POSITIVEID CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

The Settlement Agreement provides that in no event shall the number of shares of Common Stock issued to IBC or its designee in connection with the Settlement Agreement, when aggregated with all other shares of Common Stock then beneficially owned by IBC and its affiliates (as calculated pursuant to Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the rules and regulations thereunder), result in the beneficial ownership by IBC and its affiliates (as calculated pursuant to Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder) at any time of more than 4.99% of the Common Stock.

5. Stock-Based Compensation

On August 26, 2011, the Company’s stockholders approved and adopted the PositiveID Corporation 2011 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2011 Plan”). The 2011 Plan provides for awards of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, restricted stock awards, performance units, performance shares, SARs and other stock-based awards to employees and consultants. Under the 2011 Plan, up to 1 million shares of common stock may be granted pursuant to awards.

A summary of option activity under the Company’s stock incentive plans as of June 30, 2013, and changes during the six months then ended is presented below (in thousands, except per share amounts):

	Number of Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share
Outstanding at January 1, 2013		429		$	15.50
Granted		—		$	—
Exercised		—		$	—
Forfeited		(2	)	$	66.20
Outstanding at June 30, 2013		427		$	15.30
Exercisable at June 30, 2013		393		$	16.54

The Black-Scholes model, which the Company uses to determine compensation expense, requires the Company to make several key judgments including:

●

the value of the Company’s common stock;

●

the expected life of issued stock options;

●

the expected volatility of the Company’s stock price;

●

the expected dividend yield to be realized over the life of the stock option; and

●

the risk-free interest rate over the expected life of the stock options.

The Company’s computation of the expected life of issued stock options was determined based on historical experience of similar awards giving consideration to the contractual terms of the stock-based awards, vesting schedules and expectations about employees’ future length of service. The interest rate was based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The computation of volatility was based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock.

A summary of restricted stock outstanding under the Company’s stock incentive plans as of June 30, 2013 and changes during the six months then ended is presented below (in thousands):

Unvested at January 1, 2013	215
Issued	180
Vested	(95	)
Forfeited	—
Unvested at June 30, 2013	300

POSITIVEID CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Additionally, the Company has 5,564,996 unvested restricted shares outstanding, not issued under stock incentive plans, which have been issued to employees, directors, and consultants. These restricted shares vest between October 1, 2013 and January 1, 2016.

The Company recorded an expense related to stock options and restricted stock issued to employees and advisors of approximately $204,000 and $170,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively and $449,000 and $759,000 to the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

As of June 30, 2013 the Company had $1.2 million of unamortized compensation related to stock option and restricted share grants. This compensation will be amortized as an operating expense over the remainder of 2013, and the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2015.

6. Income Taxes

The Company had an effective tax rate of nil for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. The Company incurred losses before taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. However, it has not recorded a tax benefit for the resulting net operating loss carryforwards, as the Company has determined that a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets was appropriate based primarily on its historical operating results.

In July 2008, the Company completed the sale of all of the outstanding capital stock of Xmark to Stanley. In January 2010, Stanley received a notice from the Canadian Revenue Agency (“CRA”) that the CRA would be performing a review of Xmark’s Canadian tax returns for the periods 2005 through 2008. This review covers all periods that the Company owned Xmark.

In February 2011, and as revised on November 9, 2011, Stanley received a notice from the CRA that the CRA completed its review of the Xmark returns and was questioning certain deductions attributable to allocations from related companies on the tax returns under review. In November and December 2011, the CRA and the Ministry of Revenue of the Province of Ontario issued notices of reassessment confirming the proposed adjustments. The total amount of the income tax reassessments for the 2006-2008 tax years, including both provincial and federal reassessments, plus interest, was approximately $1.4 million.

On January 20, 2012, the Company received an indemnification claim notice from Stanley related to the matter. The Company does not agree with the position taken by the CRA, and filed a formal appeal related to the matter on March 8, 2012. In addition, on March 28, 2012, Stanley received assessments for withholding taxes on deemed dividend payments in respect of the disallowed management fee totaling approximately $0.2 million, for which we filed a formal appeal on June 7, 2012. In October 2012, the Company submitted a Competent Authority filing to the U.S. IRS seeking relief in the matter. In connection with the filing of the appeals, Stanley was required to remit an upfront payment of a portion of the tax reassessment totaling approximately $950,000. The Company has also filed a formal appeal related to the withholding tax assessments, pursuant to which Stanley was required to remit an additional upfront payment of approximately $220,000. Pursuant to a letter agreement dated March 7, 2012, the Company has agreed to repay Stanley for the upfront payments, plus interest at the rate of five percent per annum, in 24 equal monthly payments beginning on June 1, 2012. To the extent that the Company and Stanley reach a successful resolution of the matter through the appeals process, the upfront payment (or a portion thereof) will be returned to Stanley or the Company as applicable. Based on the Company’s review of the correspondence and evaluation of the supporting detail, it does not believe that the ultimate resolution of this matter will have a material negative impact on the Company’s historical tax liabilities or results of operations. The Company has established an accrual of $400,000 for this contingency, which management believes is adequate. This accrual was reclassified as a liability to Stanley and recorded in the tax contingency line in the consolidated balance sheets, and a prepaid tax advance to Stanley in the amount of $708,000 has been recorded, as of
June 30, 2013.

During 2012 and continuing into 2013, the Company has been delinquent in its payments to Stanley. The Company and Stanley have agreed to monthly payments of approximately $26,000 per month for 2013. The outstanding balance of the liability to Stanley is $896,000 as of June 30, 2013.

7. Legal Proceedings

The Company is a party to certain legal actions, as either plaintiff or defendant, arising in the ordinary course of business, none of which is expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations. However, litigation is inherently unpredictable, and the costs and other effects of pending or future litigation, governmental investigations, legal and administrative cases and proceedings, whether civil or criminal, settlements, judgments and investigations, claims or charges in any such matters, and developments or assertions by or against the Company relating to the Company or to the Company’s intellectual property rights and intellectual property licenses could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and operating results.

POSITIVEID CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

8. Employment Contracts and Stock Compensation to Related Parties

On September 30, 2011, the Company entered into a First Amendment to Employment and Non-Compete Agreement (the “First Silverman Amendment”) with Mr. Silverman in connection with Mr. Silverman’s ceasing to be the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. The First Silverman Amendment amended the Employment and Non-Compete Agreement dated November 11, 2010 between the Company and Mr. Silverman and provided for, among other things, the issuance of restricted stock of the Company to Mr. Silverman in the aggregate amount of approximately $3.4 million (the “Restricted Stock”) in lieu of contractually-committed cash salary and bonus for 2012 through 2015. The Restricted Stock was to be issued based upon the average daily volume-weighted average price of the Company’s common stock for the five trading days preceding the date of the First Silverman Amendment. The Restricted Stock was subject to registration rights and price protection provisions, and was to be granted upon the earlier of (i) a reverse stock split or (ii) the receipt of stockholder approval to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock of the Company to at least 7 million shares. The Restricted Stock was price protected through the date on which the registration statement registering such shares became effective, such that if the value of the Restricted Stock at such time was less than the average daily volume-weighted average price of the Company’s common stock for the five trading days preceding the date of the First Silverman Amendment, additional shares would be issued to subsidize any shortfall. On January 27, 2012, the Company issued the Restricted Stock to Mr. Silverman, totaling 0.7 million shares.

On December 6, 2011, the Compensation Committee approved an Amended and Restated Employment, Consulting and Non-Compete Agreement (the “Amended and Restated Agreement”) between the Company and Mr. Silverman in connection with Mr. Silverman’s negotiated departure from the Board of Directors of the Company as of December 6, 2011 and his continued service as consultant to the Company until March 1, 2012. The Amended and Restated Agreement amends and restates the Employment and Non-Compete Agreement dated November 11, 2010 between the Company and Mr. Silverman and the First Silverman Amendment, and provides for, among other things, clarification of the terms of Mr. Silverman’s separation from the Company and continued vesting of Mr. Silverman’s unvested stock grants. The Company also granted Mr. Silverman a security interest in substantially all of the Company’s assets (the “Security Agreement”) until such time as the stock obligations under the Amended and Restated Agreement were fulfilled.

Under the Amended and Restated Agreement, the Company agreed to satisfy certain contractual obligations totaling approximately $462,000, which was recorded in accrued liabilities at December 31, 2011 (the “Contractual Obligations”), through the issuance of 98,724 shares of common stock from the 2011 Plan to Mr. Silverman (the “Contractual Obligations Stock”) on January 2, 2012. On January 2, 2012, the Company issued the Contractual Obligations Stock to Mr. Silverman. The Company filed a registration statement on Form S-1 for resale of the Restricted Stock (the “Registration Statement”) with the SEC on January 31, 2012, as amended on February 2, 2012 and as further amended on February 13, 2012, March 28, 2012 and April 6, 2012.

On March 23, 2012, the Board of Directors approved a First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Agreement (the “First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement”) between the Company and Mr. Silverman in connection with the elimination of any and all price protection provisions under the Amended and Restated Agreement and any other further registration rights obligations. Under the First Amendment to Amended and Restated Agreement, the Company agreed to issue 0.54 million shares of restricted stock of the Company to Mr. Silverman on March 23, 2012 (the “Price Protection Shares”). The Price Protection Shares were issued in order to (i) eliminate any and all price protection provisions under the Amended and Restated Agreement, including, but not limited to, any price protection provisions relating to a reverse stock split, and (ii) any further registration rights obligations. The Price Protection Shares were included on a pre-effective amendment to the Registration Statement filed with the SEC on March 28, 2012, which Registration Statement went effective on April 10, 2012. Upon effectiveness of the Registration Statement, the Security Agreement terminated.

On December 6, 2011, the Compensation Committee approved a First Amendment to Employment and Non-Compete Agreement (the “First Caragol Amendment”) between the Company and Mr. Caragol in connection with Mr. Caragol’s assumption of the position of Chairman of the Board of the Company effective December 6, 2011. The First Caragol Amendment amends the Employment and Non-Compete Agreement dated November 11, 2010, between the Company and Mr. Caragol and provides for, among other things, the elimination of any future guaranteed raises and bonuses, other than a 2011 bonus of $375,000 to be paid beginning January 1, 2012 in twelve (12) equal monthly payments. This bonus was not paid during 2012 and on January 8, 2013, $300,000 of such bonus was converted into 738,916 shares of our restricted common stock, which vest on January 1, 2016. The remaining $75,000 remains deferred. The First Caragol Amendment obligates the Company to grant to Mr. Caragol an aggregate of 0.5 million shares of restricted stock over a four-year period as follows: (i) 100,000 shares upon execution of the First Caragol Amendment, which shall vest on January 1, 2014, (ii) 100,000 shares on January 1, 2012, which shall vest on January 1, 2015, (iii) 100,000 shares on January 1, 2013, which shall vest on January 1, 2015, (iv) 100,000 shares on January 1, 2014, which shall vest on January 1, 2016, and (v) 100,000 shares on January 1, 2015, which shall vest on January 1, 2016. Stock compensation expense related to the restricted share grants totaled approximately $180,000 and $172,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

POSITIVEID CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

On February 21, 2013, the Board approved a Tax Equalization Plan to compensate board members for permanent out-of-pocket tax payments incurred by accepting equity compensation in lieu of cash consideration between 2010-2012. The total plan compensation is $510,000 in aggregate and will only be paid out such time as the Company has sufficient working capital. The Company expensed the compensation in the six months ended June 30, 2013.

9. Agreements with The Boeing Company

On December 20, 2012, the Company entered into a Sole and Exclusive License Agreement (the “Boeing License Agreement”), a Teaming Agreement (“Teaming Agreement”), and a Security Agreement (“Boeing Security Agreement”) with The Boeing Company (“Boeing”).

The Boeing License Agreement provides Boeing the exclusive license to manufacture and sell PositiveID’s M-BAND airborne bio-threat detector for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s BioWatch Generation 3 opportunity, as well as other opportunities (government or commercial) that may arise in the North American market. As consideration for entering into the Boeing License Agreement, Boeing agreed to pay a license fee of $2.5 million (the “Boeing License Fee”) to the Company in three installments, which has been paid in full as of June 30, 2013. The $2.5 million license fee received as of June 30, 2013 has been recorded as deferred revenue.

Under the Teaming Agreement, the Company retained exclusive rights to serve as the reagent and assay supplier of the M-BAND systems to Boeing. The Company also retained all rights to sell M-BAND units, reagents and assays in international markets.

Pursuant to the Boeing Security Agreement, the Company granted Boeing a security interest in all of its assets, including the licensed products and intellectual property rights (as defined in the Boeing License Agreement), to secure the Company’s performance under the Boeing License Agreement.

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this “Report”) contains forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), that reflect our current estimates, expectations and projections about our future results, performance, prospects and opportunities. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements about our market opportunities, our business and growth strategies, our projected revenue and expense levels, possible future consolidated results of operations, the adequacy of our available cash resources, our financing plans, our competitive position and the effects of competition and the projected growth of the industries in which we operate, as well as the following statements:

●

the expectation that operating losses will continue for the near future, and that until we are able to achieve profits, we intend to continue to seek to access the capital markets to fund the development of our products;

●

that we seek to structure our research and development on a project basis to allow management of costs and results on a discrete short term project basis, the expectation that doing so may result in quarterly expenses that rise and fall depending on the underlying project status, and the expectation that this method of managing projects may allow us to minimize our firm fixed commitments at any given point in time;

●

that based on our review of the correspondence and evaluation of the supporting detail involving the Canada Revenue Agency audit, we do not believe that the ultimate resolution of this dispute will have a material negative impact on our historical tax liabilities or results of operations;

●

that we intend to continue to explore strategic opportunities, including potential acquisition opportunities of businesses that are complementary to ours;

●

that we do not anticipate declaring any cash dividends on our common stock;

●

that our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to obtain financing to fund the continued development of our products and working capital requirements;

●

that we are well positioned to compete for BioWatch Generation 3, Phase II of the BioWatch Program and to take meaningful steps in the monetization of our legacy diabetes management products;

●

that M-BAND was developed in accordance with DHS guidelines;

●

that the full-roll out of the BioWatch Generation 3, Phase II is estimated at $3.1 billion;

●

that our current cash resources, our expected access to capital under the equity line financing arrangements, and, if necessary, delaying and/or reducing certain research, development and related activities and costs, that we will have sufficient funds available to meet our working capital requirements for the near-term future;

●

that our products have certain technological advantages, but maintaining these advantages will require continual investment in research and development, and later in sales and marketing;

●

that if any of our manufacturers or suppliers were to cease supplying us with system components, we would be able to procure alternative sources without material disruption to our business, and that we plan to continue to outsource any manufacturing requirements of our current and under development products;

●

that medical application of our Firefly Dx and Dragonfly products, our breath glucose detection device, and GlucoChip product will require FDA clearance;

●

that we will receive royalties in the amount of ten percent on all gross revenues arising out of or relating to VeriTeQ’s sale of products, whether by license or otherwise, specifically relating to the United States Patent No. 7,125,382, “Embedded Bio Sensor System”, and a royalty of twenty percent on gross revenues generated under the Development and Supply Agreement between us and Medcomp dated April 2, 2009;

●

that we anticipate recognizing the entire $2.5 million fee under the Boeing License Agreement as revenue in accordance with applicable accounting literature and Securities and Exchange Commission guidance; and

●

that we will receive royalties related to our license of the iglucose™ technology to Smart Glucose Meter Corp (“SGMC”) for up to $2 million based on potential future revenues of glucose test strips sold by SGMC.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q also contains forward-looking statements attributed to third parties relating to their estimates regarding the size of the future market for products and systems such as our products and systems, and the assumptions underlying such estimates. Forward-looking statements include all statements that are not historical facts and can be identified by forward-looking statements such as “may,” “might,” “should,” “could,” “will,” “intends,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “projects,” “potential,” “continue,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects” and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are only predictions based on our current expectations and projections, or those of third parties, about future events and involve risks and uncertainties.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are based upon reasonable assumptions, no assurance can be given that such expectations will be attained or that any deviations will not be material. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking statements, events and circumstances discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may not occur and actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause our actual results, level of performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in, or implied by, the forward-looking statements we make in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are discussed under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and elsewhere in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 and include:

●

our ability to predict the extent of future losses or when we will become profitable;

●

our ability to continue as a going concern;

●

our ability to successfully consider, review, and if appropriate, implement other strategic opportunities;

●

our expectation that we will incur losses, on a consolidated basis, for the foreseeable future;

●

our ability to fund our operations and continued development of our products, including M-BAND, Dragonfly and Firefly;

●

our ability to obtain and maximize the amount of capital that we will have available to pursue business opportunities;

●

our ability to successfully identify strategic partners or acquirers for the GlucoChip and the breath glucose detection system;

●

our ability to obtain patents on our products, the validity, scope and enforceability of our patents, and the protection afforded by our patents;

●

the potential for costly product liability claims and claims that our products infringe the intellectual property rights of others;

●

our ability to comply with current and future regulations relating to our businesses;

●

the potential for patent infringement claims to be brought against us asserting that we are violating another party’s intellectual property rights;

●

the potential for an unfavorable outcome relating to the Canadian tax audit;

●

our ability to be awarded government contracts;

●

our ability to establish and maintain proper and effective internal accounting and financial controls;

●

our ability to receive royalties under the Asset Purchase Agreement with VeriTeQ;

●

our ability to receive payments from the Shared Services Agreement with VeriTeQ;

●

our ability to pay obligations when due which may result in an event of default under our financing arrangements;

●

our ability to drawdown on the equity line if the trading volume in our common stock declines;

●

our ability to access the full amount under the Investment Agreement, dated May 10, 2013, between the Company and IBC (the “Investment Agreement”).

You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. In addition, past financial or operating performance is not necessarily a reliable indicator of future performance, and you should not use our historical performance to anticipate future results or future period trends. Except as otherwise required by federal securities laws, we disclaim any obligation or undertaking to disseminate any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to reflect any change in our expectations or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based. All forward-looking statements attributable to us, or persons acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and under the section entitled “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. These are factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from expected results. Other factors besides those listed could also adversely affect us.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the accompanying financial statements and related notes included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this “Report”) as well as our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Overview

PositiveID , through its wholly owned subsidiary MicroFluidic Systems (“MFS”) (collectively, the “Company” or “PositiveID”), develops molecular diagnostic systems for bio-threat detection, for rapid diagnostic testing, and assays to detect a range of biological threats. The Company’s M-BAND (Microfluidic Bio-agent Autonomous Networked Detector) system is an airborne bio-threat detection system developed for the homeland defense industry, to detect biological weapons of mass destruction. MFS is also developing automated pathogen detection systems (Firefly Dx and Dragonfly) for rapid diagnostics, both for point of need and clinical applications.

Since its inception, and prior to our acquisition of MFS in May 2011, MFS had received over $50 million in government grants and contract work for the Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and industrial clients. MFS holds a substantial portfolio of key patents/patents pending primarily for the automation of biological detection using real-time analysis for the rapid, reliable and specific identification of pathogens.

Beginning in 2011 and continuing into the first quarter of 2013, as a part of our refocusing our business, we set out to (1) align ourselves with strong strategic partners to prepare our M-BAND product for the DHS’s BioWatch Generation 3, Phase II program, which has been estimated to be a $3.1 billion program over five years; (2) identify a research and development contract to complete the development of our clinical/point of demand diagnostic platform, the Firefly Dx and Dragonfly systems; and (3) reduce our operating costs to focus solely on those initiatives.

Subsequent to acquiring MFS, the Company has: (1) sold substantially all of the assets of NationalCreditReport.com, which it had acquired in connection with the Steel Vault Merger in 2011; (2) sold its VeriChip and HealthLink businesses in 2012; (3) drastically reduced its operating cost and cash burn; (4) entered into a license agreement and teaming agreement with The Boeing Company (“Boeing”) for its M-BAND system in the fourth quarter of 2012; and (5) executed into an exclusive license for its iglucose technology in February, 2013. The Company will continue to either seek strategic partners or acquirers for its GlucoChip and its glucose breath detection system.

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2012

Revenue and Gross Profit

We reported no revenue or gross profit from continuing operations for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. Until such time as we are under a government contract for the BioWatch Generation 3 program, under contract for the final development of our diagnostic platform (which includes our Firefly product), we do not anticipate generating significant revenue or gross profit. The Company has deferred the $2.5 million received in conjunction with the Boeing License Agreement and anticipates recognizing the entire $2.5 million fee as revenue in accordance with applicable accounting literature and Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)guidance. The Company continues to bid on various potential new United States Government contracts; however, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining any such contracts.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense

Selling, general and administrative expense consists primarily of compensation for employees in executive, sales, marketing and operational functions, including finance and accounting and corporate development, and also including stock-based compensation. Other significant costs include depreciation and amortization, professional fees for accounting and legal services, consulting fees and facilities costs.

Selling, general and administrative expense decreased by approximately $0.3 million, or 21%, for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in stock-based compensation and reductions in personnel costs, rent and other operating costs, pursuant to the Company’s efforts to reduce its operating costs.

Research and Development

Our research and development expense consists primarily of labor and materials costs associated with various development projects, including testing, developing prototypes and related expenses. Our research and development costs include payments to our project partners and acquisition of in process research and development. We seek to structure our research and development on a project basis to allow the management of costs and results on a discrete short term project basis. This may result in quarterly expenses that rise and fall depending on the underlying project status. We expect this method of managing projects to allow us to minimize our firm fixed commitments at any given point in time.

Research and development expense decreased by $85,000, or 35%, for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease was primarily attributable to decrease in activities related to the development of our molecular diagnostic products.

Other Income (Expense)

Other expense for the three months ended June 30, 2013 increased by $23,000 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2012. This increase is primarily the result of increased interest expense in 2013 related to the Company’s borrowing arrangements.

Beneficial Conversion Dividend on Preferred Stock

Beneficial conversion dividend on preferred stock for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $1.1 million and $2.9 million, respectively. This amount in both periods is a non-cash charge. The decrease of $1.8 million is primarily the result of decreased Series F preferred conversions during the three months ended June 30, 2013.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2012

Revenue and Gross Profit

We reported no revenue or gross profit from continuing operations for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. Until such time as we are under a government contract for the BioWatch Generation 3 program, under contract for the final development of our diagnostic platform (which includes our Firefly product), we do not anticipate generating significant revenue or gross profit. The Company has deferred the $2.5 million received in conjunction with the Boeing License Agreement (defined in Note 9) and anticipates recognizing the entire $2.5 million fee as revenue in accordance with applicable accounting literature and SEC guidance. The Company continues to bid on various potential new U.S. Government contracts; however, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining any such contracts.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense

Selling, general and administrative expense decreased by approximately $0.9 million, or 24%, for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in stock-based compensation and reductions in personnel costs, rent and other operating costs, pursuant to the Company’s efforts to reduce its operating costs.

Research and Development

Research and development expense decreased by $0.2 million, or 33%, for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease was primarily attributable to decrease in activities related to the development of our molecular diagnostic products.

Other Income (Expense)

Other expense for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was $166,000 and other income for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $62,000. This decrease of $228,000 is primarily the result of increased interest expense in 2013 related to the Company’s borrowing arrangements.

Beneficial Conversion Dividend on Preferred Stock

Beneficial conversion dividend on preferred stock for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 was $4.5 million and $4.9 million, respectively. This amount in both periods is a non-cash charge. The decrease of $0.4 million is primarily the result of decreased Series F preferred conversions during the six months ended June 30, 2013.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of June 30, 2013, cash and cash equivalents totaled $65,000 compared to cash and cash equivalents of $111,000 at December 31, 2012.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities totaled approximately $0.9 million and $1.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, primarily to fund operating losses. This decrease in cash used in operating activities was primarily the result of the Company’s efforts to reduce operating expenses.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was not significant for the six months ended June 30, 2013 or 2012.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Financing activities provided cash of approximately $0.8 million and $1.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, primarily related to proceeds from the issuance of shares under the Company’s equity lines, the issuance of convertible notes and debentures, and the conversion of Series F Preferred Stock and related repayments of the related note receivable in the 2013 and 2012 periods (See Note 4).

Financial Condition

As of June 30, 2013, we had a working capital deficiency of approximately $6.4 million and an accumulated deficit of approximately $119.2 million, compared to a working capital deficit of approximately $4.6 million and an accumulated deficit of approximately $111.3 million as of December 31, 2012. The decrease in working capital was primarily due to operating losses for the period, deferral of the Boeing license payments and the reclassification of the Stanley tax obligation as a current liability.

We have incurred operating losses since our inception. The current operating losses are the result of research and development expenditures, selling, general and administrative expenses related to our projects and products. We expect our operating losses to continue through at least the next twelve months. These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to obtain financing to fund the continued development of our products and to support working capital requirements. Until we are able to achieve operating profits, we will continue to seek to access the capital markets. In the six months ended June 30, 2013 we have raised approximately $0.8 million, net of $0.3 million principal payment, from a debenture, issuance of convertible debt, preferred stock conversions, and our equity line financings (See Note 4). Additionally, in March and April 2013, we received $1.5 million under the Boeing License Agreement.

On May 10, 2013, the Company entered into an Investment Agreement with IBC Funds LLC (“IBC”). Pursuant to the terms of the Investment Agreement, IBC committed to purchase up to $5,000,000 of the Company’s common stock over a period of up to thirty-six (36) months. From time to time during the thirty-six (36) month period commencing on the day immediately following the effectiveness of the registration statement that was filed with the SEC on May 10, 2013 (the “IBC Registration Statement”), the Company may deliver a drawdown notice to IBC which states the dollar amount that the Company intends to sell to IBC on a date specified in the drawdown notice. The maximum investment amount per notice shall be equal to two hundred percent (200%) of the average daily volume of the common stock for the ten consecutive trading days immediately prior to date of the applicable drawdown notice so long as such amount does not exceed 4.99% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock. The purchase price per share to be paid by IBC shall be calculated at a twenty percent (20%) discount to the average of the three lowest prices of the Company’s common stock during the ten (10) consecutive trading days immediately prior to the receipt by IBC of the drawdown notice. The IBC Registration Statement was declared effective on May 29, 2013. During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, the Company issued 1,200,000 shares to IBC under the equity line (inclusive of the commitment shares), for which it received $134,025 in proceeds.

On June 5, 2013, the Company entered into a Settlement and Agreement and Release (the “Settlement Agreement”) with IBC pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue common stock to in exchange for the settlement of $214,534.82 (the “Settlement Amount”) of past-due accounts payable of the Company. IBC purchased the accounts payable from certain vendors of the Company. On June 7, 2013, the Circuit Court of the Twelfth Judicial Circuit for Sarasota County, Florida (the “Court”), entered an order (the “Order”) approving, among other things, the fairness of the terms and conditions of an exchange pursuant to Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act, in accordance with a stipulation of settlement, pursuant to the Settlement Agreement between the Company and IBC, in the matter entitled IBC Funds, LLC v. PositiveID Corporation (the “Action”). IBC commenced the Action against the Company to recover an aggregate of $214,534.82 of past-due accounts payable of the Company (the “Claim”), which IBC had purchased from certain vendors of the Company pursuant to the terms of separate receivable purchase agreements between IBC and each of such vendors (the “Assigned Accounts”). The Assigned Accounts relate to certain legal, accounting, and financial services provided to the Company. The Settlement Agreement was entered into on June 5, 2013. The Order provides for the full and final settlement of the Claim and the Action. The Settlement Agreement became effective and binding upon the Company and IBC upon execution of the Order by the Court on June 7, 2013.

Pursuant to the terms of the Settlement Agreement approved by the Order, on June 7, 2013, the Company agreed to issue to IBC shares (the “Settlement Shares”) of the Company’s Common Stock. The Settlement Agreement provides that the Settlement Shares will be issued in one or more tranches, as necessary, sufficient to satisfy the Settlement Amount through the issuance of freely trading securities issued pursuant to Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, IBC may deliver a request to the Company which states the dollar amount (designated in U.S. Dollars) of Common Stock to be issued to IBC (the “Share Request”). The parties agree that the total amount of Common Stock to be delivered by the Company to satisfy the Share Request shall be issued at a thirty percent (30%) discount to market based upon the average of the volume weighted average price of the Common Stock over the three (3) trading day period preceding the Share Request. Additional tranche requests shall be made as requested by IBC until the Settlement Amount is paid in full so long as the number of shares requested does not make IBC the owner of more than 4.99% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock at any given time. The Company has recorded a charge of $91,944 in the quarter ended June 30, 2013 representing the total cost to the company for settling the $214,535 claim by issuing shares of common stock at a 30% discount. During the three months ended June 30, 2013, $50,000 of the settlement amount was converted into 376,789 shares of common stock.

Based on the market price of the Company’s common stock on June 30, 2013 and applying the 30% discount. 1,566,998 shares would be issuable relating to the common stock payable balance of $235,050.

These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company intends to continue to access capital to provide funds to meet its working capital requirements for the near-term future. In addition and if necessary, the Company could reduce and/or delay certain discretionary research, development and related activities and costs. However, there can be no assurances that the Company will be able to negotiate additional sources of equity or credit for its long term capital needs. The Company’s inability to have continuous access to such financing at reasonable costs could materially and adversely impact its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, and result in significant dilution to the Company’s existing stockholders. The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating recoverability of assets and classifications of assets and liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

As a “Smaller Reporting Company,” we are not required to provide the information required by this item.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls. We evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our “disclosure controls and procedures” as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) as of June 30, 2013. This evaluation (the “disclosure controls evaluation”) was done under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the person(s) performing the function of our chief executive officer (“CEO”) and acting chief financial officer (“CFO”). Rules adopted by the SEC require that in this section of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q we present the conclusions of the CEO and CFO about the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2013 based on the disclosure controls evaluation.

Objective of Controls. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed so that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Our disclosure controls and procedures are also intended to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the CEO and acting CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives, and management necessarily is required to use its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures.

Conclusion. Based upon the disclosure controls evaluation, our CEO and CFO had concluded that, as of June 30, 2013, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that the foregoing objectives are achieved.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

We are a party to certain legal actions, as either plaintiff or defendant, arising in the ordinary course of business, none of which is expected to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. However, litigation is inherently unpredictable, and the costs and other effects of pending or future litigation, governmental investigations, legal and administrative cases and proceedings, whether civil or criminal, settlements, judgments and investigations, claims or charges in any such matters, and developments or assertions by or against us relating to the Company or to our intellectual property rights and intellectual property licenses could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Other than as set forth below, there have been no material changes from the risk factors as previously disclosed in the Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Funding from our Investment Agreement with IBC may be limited or be insufficient to fund our operations or to implement our strategy.

Under our Investment Agreement with IBC, upon effectiveness of the IBC Registration Statement, and subject to other conditions, we may direct IBC to purchase up to $5,000,000 (“Total Commitment”) of our shares of common stock over a 36-month period. The IBC Registration Statement has not yet been declared effective and the timing of the effectiveness of the IBC Registration Statement cannot yet be determined. Although the Investment Agreement provides that we may sell up to $5,000,000 of our common stock to IBC, only 4,500,000 shares of our common stock are being offered under the IBC Registration Statement, which represents (i) 104,000 shares of common stock that we issued to IBC as IBC Commitment Shares, (ii) 40,064 shares of common stock that we issued to IBC pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, dated May 10, 2013, between the Company and IBC (the “SPA”) and (iii) 4,355,936 shares issuable to IBC pursuant to drawdown under the Investment Agreement.

At an assumed purchase price of $0.312 (equal to 80% of the closing price of our common stock of $0.39 on May 9, 2013), and assuming the sale by us to IBC of all of 4,355,936 shares being registered under the IBC Registration Statement pursuant to drawdown under the Investment Agreement, we would receive only approximately $1,359,052 in gross proceeds. If we elect to issue and sell more than the 4,355,936 shares offered under the IBC Registration Statement to IBC, which we have the right, but not the obligation, to do, we must first register for resale under the Securities Act any such additional shares, which could cause additional substantial dilution to our stockholders. Based on the above assumptions, we would be required to register an additional approximately 11,669,706 shares of our common stock to obtain the balance of $3,640,948 of the Total Commitment that would be available to us under the Investment Agreement.

There can be no assurance that we will be able to receive all or any of the Total Commitment from IBC because the Investment Agreement contains certain limitations, restrictions, requirements, conditions and other provisions that could limit our ability to cause IBC to buy common stock from us. For instance, the Company is prohibited from issuing a drawdown notice if the amount requested in such drawdown notice exceeds the maximum drawdown amount which shall be equal to 200% of average daily trading volume of the common stock during the pricing period or the sale of shares pursuant to the drawdown notice would cause the Company to sell or IBC to purchase an aggregate number of shares of the Company’s common stock which would result in beneficial ownership by IBC of more than 4.99% of the Company’s common stock (as calculated pursuant to Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, and the rules and regulations thereunder). Also, as discussed above, there must be an effective registration statement covering the resale of any shares to be issued pursuant to any drawdown under the Investment Agreement, and the IBC Registration Statement covers the resale of only 4,355,936 shares that may be issuable pursuant to drawdown under the Investment Agreement. These registration statements may be subject to review and comment by the staff of the SEC, and will require the consent of our independent registered public accounting firm. Therefore, the timing of effectiveness of these registration statements cannot be assured.

The extent to which we rely on IBC as a source of funding will depend on a number of factors, including the amount of working capital needed, the prevailing market price of our common stock and the extent to which we are able to secure working capital from other sources. If obtaining sufficient funding from IBC were to prove unavailable or prohibitively dilutive, we would need to secure another source of funding. Even if we sell all $5,000,000 of common stock under the Investment Agreement with IBC, we will still need additional capital to fully implement our current business, operating plans and development plans.

IBC will pay less than the then-prevailing market price for our common stock.

The common stock to be issued to IBC pursuant to the Investment Agreement will be purchased at a 20% discount to the average of the three lowest prices of our common stock during the ten (10) consecutive trading days immediately before IBC receives our notice of sale. IBC has a financial incentive to sell our common stock immediately upon receiving the shares to realize the profit equal to the difference between the discounted price and the market price. If IBC sells the shares, the price of our common stock could decrease. If our stock price decreases, IBC may have a further incentive to sell the shares of our common stock that it holds. These sales may have a further impact on our stock price.

Your ownership interest may be diluted and the value of our common stock may decline by exercising the drawdown right pursuant to the Investment Agreement.

Pursuant to the Investment Agreement, when we deem it necessary, we may raise capital through the private sale of our common stock to IBC at a price equal to a 20% discount to the average of the three lowest prices of our common stock for the ten (10) consecutive trading days before IBC receives our notice of sale. Because the drawdown price is lower than the prevailing market price of our common stock, to the extent that the drawdown right is exercised, your ownership interest may be diluted.

We have registered an aggregate of 4,500,000 shares of common stock to be issued under the Investment Agreement and the SPA. The sales of such shares could depress the market price of our common stock.

We are registered an aggregate of 4,500,000 shares of common stock under the IBC Registration Statement, including 4,355,936 shares issuable pursuant to the drawdown notice under the Investment Agreement, 104,000 IBC Commitment Shares pursuant to the Investment Agreement and 40,064 shares issued under the SPA. Notwithstanding IBC’s ownership limitation, the 4,500,000 shares would represent approximately 22.2% of our shares of common stock outstanding immediately after our exercise of the drawdown right under the Investment Agreement. The sale of these shares into the public market by IBC could depress the market price of our common stock.

At an assumed purchase price of $0.312 (equal to 80% of the closing price of our common stock of $0.39 on May 9, 2013), we will be able to receive up $1,359,052 in gross proceeds, assuming the sale of the entire 4,355,936 shares being registered hereunder pursuant to the Investment Agreement. Accordingly, we would be required to register additional 11,669,706 shares to obtain the balance of $3,640,948 under the Investment Agreement. Due to the floating offering price, we are not able to determine the exact number of shares that we will issue under the Investment Agreement.

We may not have access to the full amount available under the Investment Agreement.

We have not drawn down funds and have not issued shares of our common stock under the Investment Agreement. Our ability to drawdown funds and sell shares under the Investment Agreement requires that the IBC Registration Statement be declared effective by the SEC, and that the IBC Registration Statement continue to be effective. In addition, the IBC Registration Statement registers 4,355,936 shares issuable under the Investment Agreement, and our ability to sell any remaining shares issuable under the Investment Agreement is subject to our ability to prepare and file one or more additional registration statements registering the resale of these shares. These registration statements may be subject to review and comment by the staff of the SEC, and will require the consent of our independent registered public accounting firm. Therefore, the timing of effectiveness of these registration statements cannot be assured. The effectiveness of these registration statements is a condition precedent to our ability to sell the shares of common stock to IBC under the Investment Agreement. Even if we are successful in causing one or more registration statements registering the resale of some or all of the shares issuable under the Investment Agreement to be declared effective by the SEC in a timely manner, we may not be able to sell the shares unless certain other conditions are met. For instance, we are prohibited from issuing a drawdown notice if the amount requested in such drawdown notice exceeds the maximum drawdown amount which shall be equal to 200% of average daily trading volume of the common stock during the pricing period or the sale of shares pursuant to the drawdown notice would cause us to sell or IBC to purchase an aggregate number of shares of our common stock which would result in beneficial ownership by IBC of more than 4.99% of our common stock. Accordingly, because our ability to drawdown any amounts under the Investment Agreement is subject to a number of conditions, there is no guarantee that we will be able to drawdown any portion or all of the proceeds of $5,000,000 under the Investment Agreement.

Certain restrictions on the extent of drawdowns and the delivery of advance notices may have little, if any, effect on the adverse impact of our issuance of shares in connection with the Investment Agreement, and as such, IBC may sell a large number of shares, resulting in substantial dilution to the value of shares held by existing stockholders.

IBC has agreed, subject to certain exceptions listed in the Investment Agreement, to refrain from holding an amount of shares which would result in IBC or its affiliates owning more than 4.99% of the then-outstanding shares of our common stock at any one time. These restrictions, however, do not prevent IBC from selling shares of common stock received in connection with a drawdown, and then receiving additional shares of common stock in connection with a subsequent drawdown. In this way, IBC could sell more than 4.99% of the outstanding common stock in a relatively short time frame while never holding more than 4.99% at one time.

Item 2. Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities.

During the three months ended June 30, 2013, we issued shares of our common stock that were not registered under the Securities Act, and were not previously disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K as follows:

1)	On April 12, 2013, we issued 40,000 shares of our common stock to Trilogy Capital Partners, Inc. in connection with an advisory agreement.

2)	On April 22, 2013, we issued 72,000 shares of our common stock to JMJ Financial in connection with the issuance of a promissory note.

3)	On April 26, 2013, we issued 200,000 shares of our common stock to MarketByte, LLC connection with a consulting engagement agreement.

4)	On April 26, 2013, we issued 100,000 shares of our common stock to SmallCapVoice.com, Inc. in connection with a consulting engagement agreement.

5)	On May 8, 2013, we issued 85,656 shares of our common stock to JMJ Financial in connection with the issuance of a promissory note.

6)	On May 21, 2013, we issued 80,000 shares of our common stock to Steve Kashian in connection with a consulting engagement agreement.

7)	On May 21, 2013, 2013, we issued 100,000 shares of our common stock to JMJ Financial in connection with the issuance of a promissory note.

8)	On June 4, 2013, we issued 55,000 shares of our common stock to Vista Partners, LLC connection with a consulting engagement agreement.

9)	On June 4, 2013, we issued 50,000 shares of our common stock to Cali Van Zant connection with a consulting engagement agreement.

10)	On June 4, 2013, we issued 19,000 shares of our common stock to Infinite Vision connection with a consulting engagement agreement.

11)	On June12, 2013, we issued 300,000 shares of our common stock to Hanover Financial Services connection with a consulting engagement agreement.

12)	On June 17, 2013, 2013, we issued 160,000 shares of our common stock to JMJ Financial in connection with the issuance of a promissory note

13)	On June 17, 2013, 2013, we issued 376,789 shares of our common stock to IBC in connection with the conversion of a court settled liability.

The shares of common stock described in this Item 2 were issued without registration in reliance upon the exemption provided, among others, by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as a transaction not involving any public offering. Our reliance on Section 4(2) of the Securities Act was based upon the following factors: (a) the transaction did not involve a public offering; (b) there were only a limited number of offerees; (c) there were no subsequent or contemporaneous public offerings of the securities by us; (d) the securities were not broken down into smaller denominations; and (e) the negotiations for the sale of the stock took place directly between the offeree and us.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

None.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

Item 6. Exhibits.

We have listed the exhibits by numbers corresponding to the Exhibit Table of Item 601 in Regulation S-K on the Exhibit list attached to this report.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

	POSITIVEID CORPORATION (Registrant)

Date: August 14, 2013	By:	/s/ William J. Caragol
		William J. Caragol
		Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and Acting Chief Financial Officer (Duly Authorized Officer, Principal Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer)

Exhibit Index

Exhibit
Number		Description
3.1		Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of PositiveID Corporation filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware on December 18, 2006, as amended on November 10, 2009, January 27, 2012, May 31, 2012 and April 18, 2013 (1)
3.2		Amended and Restated By-laws of PositiveID Corporation adopted as of December 12, 2005, as amended on March 16, 2010 (2)
4.1		Common Stock Purchase Warrant, dated February 27, 2013, issued to JMJ Financial (3)
4.2		Senior Secured, Convertible, Redeemable Debenture issued to TC4 Global Credit Master Fund, LP on January 16, 2013 (3)
10.1		Termination Agreement, dated January 16, 2013, between PositiveID Corporation and William J. Caragol (3)
10.2		Termination Agreement, dated January 16, 2013, between PositiveID Corporation and Holland & Knight LLP (3)
10.3		Intercreditor and Non-Disturbance Agreement, dated March 18, 2013, among PositiveID Corporation and MicroFluidic Systems; VeriGreen Energy Corporation, Steel Vault Corporation, IFTH NY Sub, Inc., and IFTH NJ Sub, Inc., The Boeing Company and TCA Global Credit Master Fund, LP (3)
10.4		Securities Purchase Agreement, dated January 16, 2013, between PositiveID Corporation and TCA Global Credit Master Fund, LP (3)
10.5		Security Agreement, dated January 16, 2013, between PositiveID Corporation and TCA Global Credit Master Fund, LP (3)
10.6		Security Agreement, dated January 16, 2013, between TCA Global Credit Master Fund, LP and the subsidiaries of PositiveID Corporation named therein (3)
10.7		Guaranty Agreement, dated January 16, 2013, by the subsidiaries of PositiveID Corporation named therein in favor of TCA Global Credit Master Fund, LP (3)
10.8		Subordination of Loans Agreement, dated January 16, 2013, between PositiveID Corporation, the subsidiaries of PositiveID Corporation named therein, and TCA Global Credit Master Fund, LP (3)
10.9		Validity Guaranty, dated January 16, 2013, executed by William J. Caragol in favor of TCA Global Credit Master Fund, LP (3)
10.10		Agreement, dated February 15, 2013, among PositiveID Corporation, Smart Glucose Meter Corp., Easy Check Medical Diagnostics, LLC, Easy-Check Medical Diagnostic Technologies Ltd., and Benjamin Atkin (3)
10.11		Investment Agreement, dated May 10, 2013, between PositiveID Corporation and IBC Funds LLC (4)
10.12		Registration Rights Agreement, dated May 10, 2013, between PositiveID Corporation and IBC Funds LLC (4)
10.13		Securities Purchase Agreement, dated May 10, 2013, between PositiveID Corporation and IBC Funds LLC (4)
10.14		Settlement Agreement and Release, dated June 5, 2013, between PositiveID Corporation and IBC Funds LLC (5)
10.15		Letter Agreement, dated July 8, 2013, between PositiveID Corporation and VeriTeQ Acquisition Corporation (6)
31.1	*	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	†	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS	**	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB	**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

*	Filed herewith.
†	Furnished herewith
**	As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.
(1)	Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K/A previously filed by PositiveID Corporation on April 26, 2013.

(2)	Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K previously filed by PositiveID Corporation on March 19, 2010.
(3)	Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K previously filed by PositiveID Corporation on April 16, 2013.
(4)	Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K previously filed by PositiveID Corporation on May 10, 2013.
(5)	Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K previously filed by PositiveID Corporation on June 7, 2013.
(6)	Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K previously filed by PositiveID Corporation on July 10, 2013.

*	Filed herewith.
†	Furnished herewith
**	As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.
(1)	Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K/A previously filed by PositiveID Corporation on April 26, 2013.
(2)	Incorporated by reference to the Form 10-K previously filed by PositiveID Corporation on March 19, 2010.
(3)	Incorporated by reference to Form 10-K previously filed by PositiveID Corporation on April 16, 2013.
(4)	Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K previously filed by PositiveID Corporation on May 10, 2013.
(5)	Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K previously filed by PositiveID Corporation on June 7, 2013.
(6)	Incorporated by reference to the Form 8-K previously filed by PositiveID Corporation on July 10, 2013.