SUPPLEMENTAL NON-CASH ACTIVITIES:

1.     BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, the “Company”) in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information that are consistent in all material respects with those applied in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, and pursuant to the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 promulgated by Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes to financial statements required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements contain all normal and recurring adjustments necessary to fairly present the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017. The condensed consolidated financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

2.     USE OF ESTIMATES AND RECLASSIFICATIONS

The Company’s reports for interim periods utilize numerous estimates of general and administrative expenses and other costs for the full year. Future actual amounts may differ from these estimates. Amounts reflected in interim reports are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. Certain amounts in the December 31, 2017 condensed consolidated balance sheet were reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation. Such amounts had no impact on total assets and liabilities or net income and comprehensive income (loss) previously reported.

3.     BASIC AND DILUTED SHARES

Basic and diluted weighted-average shares outstanding for the periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:

Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed similar to basic net income (loss) per common share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares from share-based compensation arrangements had been issued.

Potentially dilutive shares arise from non-qualified stock options to purchase common stock. The treasury stock method is utilized to determine the number of potentially dilutive shares related to the outstanding non-qualified stock options.

Property at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 consisted of the following:

Land

Most of the Company’s 22,800 acres of land were acquired between 1911 and 1932 and is carried in its balance sheets at cost. Approximately 20,700 acres of land are located in West Maui and comprise a largely contiguous parcel that extends from the sea to an elevation of approximately 5,700 feet. This parcel includes approximately 900 acres within the Kapalua Resort, a master-planned, destination resort and residential community located in West Maui encompassing approximately 3,000 acres. The Company’s remaining 2,100 acres of land are located in Upcountry Maui in an area commonly known as Hali’imaile and are mainly comprised of leased agricultural fields, including related processing and maintenance facilities.

Land Improvements

Land improvements are comprised primarily of roads, utilities, and landscaping infrastructure improvements at the Kapalua Resort. Also included is the Company’s potable and non-potable water systems in West Maui. The majority of the Company’s land improvements were constructed and placed in service in the mid-to-late 1970’s or conveyed in 2017. Depreciation expense would be considerably higher if these assets were stated at current replacement cost.

Buildings

Buildings are comprised of restaurant, retail and light industrial spaces located at the Kapalua Resort and Hali’imaile which are used in the Company’s leasing operations. The majority of the buildings were constructed and placed in service in the mid-to-late 1970’s. Depreciation expense would be considerably higher if these assets were stated at current replacement cost.

5.     ASSETS HELD FOR SALE AND REAL ESTATE OPERATING REVENUES

Assets held for sale at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 consisted of the following:

None of the above assets held for sale have been pledged as collateral under the Company’s credit facility.

Included in the Company’s real estate operating revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2017 are approximately $6.7 million of land improvements that were conveyed to the Company by the owner of a 125-acre portion of the Company’s Kapalua Mauka project. The owner purchased the 125-acre property, commonly known as Mahana Estates, in 2009. As part of the sale, the owner agreed to subsequently develop and convey to the Company upon completion certain easements, subdivision and utility improvements related to the Mahana Estates property. The owner completed and conveyed the land improvements to the Company in April 2017.

In February 2017, the Company sold the 15-acre Kapalua Golf Academy practice course located in the Kapalua Resort for $7.0 million to the owner of the Kapalua Plantation and Bay Golf Courses. The property was sold without any development entitlements. The sale resulted in a gain of approximately $6.4 million. The Company used $5.6 million of the sale proceeds to pay down its long-term debt.

6.     LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt is comprised of amounts outstanding under the Company’s $15.0 million revolving line of credit facility with First Hawaiian Bank (Credit Facility). The Credit Facility matures on December 31, 2019 and provides for two optional one-year extension periods. Interest on borrowings is at LIBOR plus 3.50%, or 5.48% and 4.86% at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. The Company has pledged its 800-acre Kapalua Mauka project and approximately 30,000 square feet of commercial leased space in the Kapalua Resort as security for the Credit Facility. Net proceeds from the sale of any collateral are required to be repaid toward outstanding borrowings and will permanently reduce the Credit Facility’s revolving commitment amount. There are no commitment fees on the unused portion of the Credit Facility.

The terms of the Credit Facility include various representations, warranties, affirmative, negative and financial covenants and events of default customary for financings of this type. Financial covenants include a minimum liquidity (as defined) of $1.5 million, a maximum of $45.0 million in total liabilities, and a limitation on new indebtedness.

The Company believes that it is in compliance with the covenants under the Credit Facility as of June 30, 2018.

The Company’s directors, officers and certain members of management receive a portion of their compensation in shares of the Company’s common stock granted under the Company’s 2017 Equity and Incentive Award Plan (Equity Plan). Share-based compensation is valued based on the average of the high and low share price on the date of grant. Shares are issued upon execution of agreements reflecting the grantee’s acceptance of the respective shares subject to the terms and conditions of the Equity Plan. Restricted shares issued under the Equity Plan vest quarterly and have voting and regular dividend rights but cannot be disposed of until such time as they are vested. All unvested restricted shares are forfeited upon the grantee’s termination of directorship or employment from the Company.

Share-based compensation is determined and awarded annually to the Company’s officers and certain members of management based on their achievement of certain predefined performance goals and objectives under the Equity Plan. Such share-based compensation is comprised of an annual incentive paid in shares of common stock and a long-term incentive paid in restricted shares vesting quarterly over a period of three years.

Share-based compensation totaled $899,000 and $812,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Included in these amounts were $268,000 and $207,000 of restricted shares of common stock which vested during the first six months of 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Accrued retirement benefits at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 consisted of the following:

The net periodic benefit costs for pension and postretirement benefits for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:

The Company uses a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Company’s effective tax rate for 2018 and 2017 reflects the recognition of expected federal alternative minimum tax liabilities and interim period tax benefits and changes to its tax valuation allowance. In 2017, the Company fully utilized the special alternative minimum tax net operating loss carryforward from 2008 which allows for 100% offset to the alternative minimum taxable income in subsequent years.

10.     REPORTABLE OPERATING SEGMENTS

The Company’s reportable operating segments are comprised of the discrete business units whose operating results are regularly reviewed by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer – its chief decision maker – in assessing performance and determining the allocation of resources. Reportable operating segments are as follows:

The Company’s reportable operating segment results are measured based on operating income (loss), exclusive of interest, depreciation, general and administrative, share-based compensation, pension and other postretirement expenses.

Reportable operating segment revenues and income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:

There have been no changes in the status of commitments and contingencies as reported in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. There are various other claims and legal actions pending against the Company. In the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, the resolution of these other matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

GAAP establishes a framework for measuring fair value and requires certain disclosures about fair value measurements to enable the reader of the financial statements to assess the inputs used to develop those measurements by establishing a hierarchy for ranking the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. GAAP requires that financial assets and liabilities be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

The Company considers all cash on hand to be unrestricted cash for the purposes of the consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of cash flows. The fair value of receivables and payables approximate their carrying value due to the short-term nature of the instruments. The valuation is based on settlements of similar financial instruments all of which are short-term in nature and are generally settled at or near cost. The fair value of debt was estimated based on borrowing rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms and maturities. The carrying amount of debt at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 was $1,235,000, which approximated fair value. The fair value of debt was measured using the level 2 inputs, noted above.

13.     NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an Accounting Standards Update (ASU) on recognition of revenue arising from contracts with customers, as well as recognition of gains and losses from the transfer of nonfinancial assets in contracts with noncustomers, and subsequently, it issued additional guidance that further clarified the ASU. The revenue recognition ASU has implications for all revenues, excluding those that are under the specific scope of other accounting standards, such as revenue associated with leases (described below).

The Company’s revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2018, that were subject to the revenue recognition ASU were as follows (in thousands):

The core principle underlying the revenue recognition ASU is that an entity will recognize revenue to represent the transfer of goods and services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in such exchange. This requires entities to identify contractual performance obligations and determine whether revenue should be recognized at a point in time or over time, based on when control of goods and services transfers to a customer. The Company’s revenue streams are recognized at a point in time except for the utilities and resort amenities revenue. Utility services are recognized as provided over the monthly billing period, and the annual membership dues are recognized over a period of twelve months.

A customer is distinguished from a noncustomer by the nature of the goods or services that are transferred. Customers are provided with goods or services that are generated by a company’s ordinary output activities, whereas noncustomers are provided with nonfinancial assets that are outside of a company’s ordinary output activities. This distinction may not significantly change the pattern of income recognition but determines whether that income is classified as revenue (contracts with customers) or other gains/losses (contracts with noncustomers) in the Company’s financial statements. The Company’s revenue streams for the period were generated as ordinary output activities to customers as defined by the guidance and were properly classified as revenues.

The ASU requires the use of a new five-step model to recognize revenue from customer contracts. The five-step model requires that the Company (i) identify the contract with the customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii) determine the transaction price, including variable consideration to the extent that it is probable that a significant future reversal will not occur, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the respective performance obligations in the contract, and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the Company satisfies the performance obligation. The application of the five-step model to the revenue streams compared to the prior guidance did not result in significant changes in the way the Company records its real estate revenue, utilities revenue and resort amenities and other revenues.

An entity is also required to determine if it controls the goods or services prior to the transfer to the customer in order to determine if it should account for the arrangement as a principal or agent. Principal arrangements, where the entity controls the goods or services provided, will result in the recognition of the gross amount of consideration expected in the exchange. Agent arrangements, where the entity simply arranges but does not control the goods or services being transferred to the customer, will result in the recognition of the net amount the entity is entitled to retain in the exchange. The Company is currently evaluating the option to use a practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components as shown in ASU No.2018-11 prior to adoption in 2019. Property services categorized as nonlease components that are reimbursed by the Company’s tenants may need to be presented on a net basis if it is determined that the Company held an agent arrangement.

Upon adoption, entities can use either a full retrospective or modified retrospective method to adopt this ASU. Under the full retrospective method, all periods presented will be restated upon adoption to conform to the new standard and a cumulative adjustment for effects on periods prior to 2016 will be recorded to retained earnings as of January 1, 2016. Under the modified retrospective approach, prior periods are not restated to conform to the new standard. Instead, a cumulative adjustment for effects of applying the new standard to periods prior to 2018 is recorded to retained earnings as of January 1, 2018. Additionally, incremental footnote disclosures are required to present the 2018 revenues under the prior standard. Under the modified retrospective method, an entity may also elect to apply the standard to either (i) all contracts as of January 1, 2018, or (ii) only to contracts that are not completed as of January 1, 2018. The Company elected to adopt this guidance using the modified retrospective method at January 1, 2018 which did not result in an adjustment to retained earnings. Additionally, upon adoption, the Company evaluated its revenue recognition policy for all revenue streams within the scope of the ASU under previous standards and using the five-step model under the new guidance and confirmed that there were no differences in the pattern of revenue recognition.

In February 2016, FASB issued an ASU that sets out the principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of leases for both parties to a lease agreement (i.e., lessees and lessors). The ASU is further supplemented by ASU No. 2018-11 and effective for the Company no later than January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The updated ASU provides the Company an option to use a practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components. This ASU will govern the recognition of revenue for lease components. Revenue related to nonlease components under the Company’s lease agreements will be subject to the new revenue recognition standard effective upon adoption of the new lease accounting standard. The Company expects to adopt the new lease accounting standard on January 1, 2019.

In August 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows. This ASU aims to reduce the existing diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for public business entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In October 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Income Taxes. This ASU simplifies the recognition of intra-entity income tax consequences when an asset other than inventory is transferred. This ASU is effective for public business entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In November 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows-Restricted Cash. This ASU addresses the diversity in the classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. This ASU is effective for public business entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In December 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This ASU summarizes the various amendments that serve to clarify the codification or to correct unintended application of guidance. This ASU is effective for public business entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In March 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation-Retirement Benefits. This ASU aims to improve the presentation of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost by requiring the reporting of the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by employees during the period. The other components of net benefit cost are required to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotal of income from operations. This ASU is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Scope of Modification Accounting. This ASU clarifies which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. This ASU is effective for public business entities for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.