Blueprint
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
☑ QUARTERLY REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2018
OR
☐ TRANSITION REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the Transition Period from ___ to ___
Commission File Number 1-14523
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
California
|
|
95-2086631
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification Number)
|
|
|
|
16139 Wyandotte Street
|
|
|
Van Nuys, California
|
|
91406
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
Registrant's
Telephone Number, Including Area
Code: 818-787-7000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a nonaccelerated
filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.
See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting
company”, and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b2 of
the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer
|
☐
|
|
Accelerated Filer
|
☐
|
Non-Accelerated Filer
|
☐
|
|
Smaller reporting company
|
☒
|
|
|
|
Emerging growth company
|
☐
|
|
|
|
|
|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the
registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period
for complying with any new or revised financial accounting
standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange
Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
☐ No ☒
As of November 1, 2018, there were 3,608,055 shares of the issuer’s Common Stock, no par
value, outstanding.
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL
INDEX TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION, OTHER
INFORMATION AND SIGNATURE
|
|
Page
|
Part I.
|
Financial Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
Part II.
|
Other Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The
discussions of Trio-Tech International’s (the
“Company”) business and activities set forth in this
Form 10-Q and in other past and future reports and announcements by
the Company may contain forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and assumptions regarding future activities and results of
operations of the Company. In light of the “safe
harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995, the following factors, among others, could
cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in
any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company:
market acceptance of Company products and services; changing
business conditions or technologies and volatility in the
semiconductor industry, which could affect demand for the
Company’s products and services; the impact of competition;
problems with technology; product development schedules; delivery
schedules; changes in military or commercial testing specifications
which could affect the market for the Company’s products and
services; difficulties in profitably integrating acquired
businesses, if any, into the Company; risks associated with
conducting business internationally and especially in Asia,
including currency fluctuations and devaluation, currency
restrictions, local laws and restrictions and possible social,
political and economic instability; changes in U.S. and global
financial and equity markets, including market disruptions and
significant interest rate fluctuations; and other economic,
financial and regulatory factors beyond the Company’s
control. Other than statements of historical fact, all statements
made in this Quarterly Report are forward-looking, including, but
not limited to, statements regarding industry prospects, future
results of operations or financial position, and statements of our
intent, belief and current expectations about our strategic
direction, prospective and future financial results and condition.
In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the
use of terminology such as “may,” “will,”
“expects,” “plans,”
“anticipates,” “estimates,”
“potential,” “believes,” “can
impact,” “continue,” or the negative thereof or
other comparable terminology. Forward-looking statements
involve risks and uncertainties that are inherently difficult to
predict, which could cause actual outcomes and results to differ
materially from our expectations, forecasts and
assumptions.
Unless
otherwise required by law, we undertake no obligation to update
forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events, changed
circumstances, or the occurrence of unanticipated events. You are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking
statements.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT NUMBER
OF SHARES)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
CURRENT
ASSETS:
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$7,101
|
$6,539
|
Short-term
deposits
|
1,011
|
653
|
Trade
accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $249
and $259
|
8,121
|
7,747
|
Other
receivables
|
889
|
881
|
Inventories,
less provision for obsolete inventory of $694 and $695
|
2,386
|
2,930
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
330
|
208
|
Assets
held for sale
|
486
|
91
|
Total current assets
|
20,324
|
19,049
|
NON-CURRENT
ASSETS:
|
|
|
Deferred
tax asset
|
406
|
400
|
Investment
properties, net
|
693
|
1,146
|
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
12,267
|
11,935
|
Other
assets
|
1,664
|
2,249
|
Restricted
term deposits
|
1,685
|
1,695
|
Total non-current assets
|
16,715
|
17,425
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
$37,039
|
$36,474
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
CURRENT
LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
Lines
of credit
|
$2,133
|
$2,043
|
Accounts
payable
|
2,939
|
3,704
|
Accrued
expenses
|
3,571
|
3,172
|
Income
taxes payable
|
255
|
285
|
Current
portion of bank loans payable
|
478
|
367
|
Current
portion of capital leases
|
248
|
250
|
Total current liabilities
|
9,624
|
9,821
|
NON-CURRENT
LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
Bank
loans payable, net of current portion
|
2,647
|
1,437
|
Capital leases,
net of current portion
|
450
|
524
|
Deferred
tax liabilities
|
359
|
327
|
Income
taxes payable
|
756
|
828
|
Other
non-current liabilities
|
36
|
36
|
Total non-current liabilities
|
4,248
|
3,152
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
$13,872
|
$12,973
|
|
|
|
EQUITY
|
|
|
TRIO-TECH
INTERNATIONAL’S SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:
|
|
|
Common
stock, no par value, 15,000,000 shares authorized; 3,608,055 shares
issued outstanding as at September 30, 2018, and 3,553,055 shares
as at June 30, 2018
|
$11,222
|
$11,023
|
Paid-in
capital
|
3,251
|
3,249
|
Accumulated
retained earnings
|
5,590
|
5,525
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive gain-translation adjustments
|
1,719
|
2,182
|
Total Trio-Tech International shareholders' equity
|
21,782
|
21,979
|
Non-controlling
interest
|
1,385
|
1,522
|
TOTAL
EQUITY
|
$23,167
|
$23,501
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
$37,039
|
$36,474
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME / (LOSS)
UNAUDITED (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Manufacturing
|
$3,637
|
$4,765
|
Testing
services
|
4,437
|
4,605
|
Distribution
|
1,944
|
1,536
|
Others
|
27
|
39
|
|
10,045
|
10,945
|
Cost of Sales
|
|
|
Cost
of manufactured products sold
|
2,857
|
3,649
|
Cost
of testing services rendered
|
3,383
|
3,139
|
Cost
of distribution
|
1,686
|
1,368
|
Others
|
18
|
29
|
|
7,944
|
8,185
|
|
|
|
Gross Margin
|
2,101
|
2,760
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
General
and administrative
|
1,759
|
1,839
|
Selling
|
147
|
179
|
Research
and development
|
72
|
184
|
Loss
on disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
-
|
11
|
Total
operating expenses
|
1,978
|
2,213
|
|
|
|
Income from Operations
|
123
|
547
|
|
|
|
Other Income
|
|
|
Interest
expenses
|
(78)
|
(58)
|
Other income,
net
|
43
|
158
|
Total
other income
|
(35)
|
100
|
|
|
|
Income from Continuing Operations before Income
Taxes
|
88
|
647
|
|
|
|
Income Tax Expenses
|
(74)
|
(42)
|
|
|
|
Income from Continuing Operations before Non-controlling Interest,
Net of Tax
|
14
|
605
|
|
|
|
Discontinued Operations
|
|
|
Loss
from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
(8)
|
(3)
|
NET INCOME
|
6
|
602
|
|
|
|
Less:
net (loss) / income attributable to the non-controlling
interest
|
(59)
|
27
|
Net Income Attributable to Trio-Tech International Common
Shareholder
|
$65
|
$575
|
|
|
|
Amounts Attributable to Trio-Tech International Common
Shareholders:
|
|
|
Income
from continuing operations, net of tax
|
69
|
576
|
Loss
from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
(4)
|
(1)
|
Net Income Attributable to Trio-Tech International Common
Shareholders
|
$65
|
$575
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings per Share:
|
|
|
Basic
per share from continuing operations attributable to Trio-Tech
International
|
$0.02
|
$0.16
|
Basic
earnings per share from discontinued operations attributable to
Trio-Tech International
|
$-
|
$-
|
Basic Earnings per Share from Net Income
|
|
|
Attributable to Trio-Tech International
|
$0.02
|
$0.16
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings per Share:
|
|
|
Diluted
earnings per share from continuing operations attributable to
Trio-Tech International
|
$0.02
|
$0.16
|
Diluted
earnings per share from discontinued operations attributable to
Trio-Tech International
|
$-
|
$-
|
Diluted Earnings per Share from Net Income
|
|
|
Attributable to Trio-Tech International
|
$0.02
|
$0.16
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
Basic
|
3,608
|
3,533
|
Dilutive
effect of stock options
|
124
|
140
|
Number
of shares used to compute earnings per share diluted
|
3,732
|
3,673
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME /
(LOSS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Trio-Tech
International Common Shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
6
|
602
|
Foreign
currency translation, net of tax
|
(539)
|
375
|
Comprehensive (Loss) / Income
|
(533)
|
977
|
Less:
comprehensive (loss) / income attributable to the non-controlling
interests
|
(135)
|
27
|
Comprehensive (Loss) / Income Attributable to Trio-Tech
International Common Shareholders
|
$(398)
|
$950
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(IN THOUSANDS)
Three Months ended September 30, 2018
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at June 30, 2018
|
3,553
|
11,023
|
3,249
|
5,525
|
2,182
|
1,522
|
23,501
|
Stock
option expenses
|
-
|
-
|
2
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2
|
Net
income / (loss)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
65
|
-
|
(59)
|
6
|
Dividend declared
by subsidiary
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(2)
|
(2)
|
Exercise of stock
option
|
55
|
199
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
199
|
Translation
adjustment
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(463)
|
(76)
|
(539)
|
Balance
at Sept. 30, 2018
|
3,608
|
11,222
|
3,251
|
5,590
|
1,719
|
1,385
|
23,167
|
Three Months ended September 30, 2017
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at June 30, 2017
|
3,523
|
10,921
|
3,206
|
4,341
|
1,633
|
1,426
|
21,527
|
Stock
option expenses
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
Net
income
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
575
|
-
|
27
|
602
|
Dividend declared
by subsidiary
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(2)
|
(2)
|
Issue of restricted
shares to consultant
|
10
|
51
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
51
|
Translation
adjustment
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
374
|
1
|
375
|
Balance
at Sept. 30, 2017
|
3,533
|
10,972
|
3,207
|
4,916
|
2,007
|
1,452
|
22,554
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (IN THOUSANDS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow from Operating Activities
|
|
|
Net
income
|
$6
|
$602
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash flow provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
555
|
500
|
Stock
compensation
|
2
|
1
|
Reversal
of provision for obsolete inventory
|
1
|
(2)
|
Bad
debt recovery
|
(2)
|
-
|
Accrued
interest expense, net accrued interest income
|
13
|
51
|
Gain
on proceeds from insurance claim
|
-
|
(73)
|
Issuance
of shares to service provider
|
-
|
51
|
Loss
on disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
-
|
11
|
Warranty
recovery, net
|
(13)
|
(7)
|
Deferred
tax benefit
|
21
|
(26)
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisition
effects
|
|
|
Trade
accounts receivable
|
(372)
|
(1,163)
|
Other
receivables
|
(8)
|
99
|
Other
assets
|
517
|
(262)
|
Inventories
|
535
|
(699)
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
(122)
|
(110)
|
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
(473)
|
935
|
Income
taxes payable
|
(102)
|
22
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
|
558
|
(70)
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow from Investing Activities
|
|
|
Additions
to property, plant and equipment
|
(1,214)
|
(529)
|
Proceeds
from disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
3
|
-
|
Insurance
proceeds received
|
-
|
73
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
|
(1,211)
|
(456)
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow from Financing Activities
|
|
|
Repayment
on lines of credit
|
(3,728)
|
(2,935)
|
Repayment
of bank loans and capital leases
|
(182)
|
(186)
|
Dividends
paid on non-controlling interest
|
(2)
|
(2)
|
Proceeds
from exercising stock options
|
199
|
-
|
Proceeds
from lines of credit
|
3,877
|
878
|
Proceeds
from bank loans
|
1,475
|
1,320
|
Net Cash Generated from / (Used in) Financing
Activities
|
1,639
|
(925)
|
|
|
|
Effect of Changes in Exchange Rate
|
(76)
|
152
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted
cash
|
910
|
(1,299)
|
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of
period
|
8,887
|
7,216
|
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of
period
|
$9,797
|
$5,917
|
|
|
|
Supplementary Information of Cash Flows
|
|
|
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
|
|
Interest
|
$65
|
$49
|
Income
taxes
|
$24
|
$52
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash Transactions
|
|
|
Capital
lease of property, plant and equipment
|
$-
|
$-
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
Reconciliation of Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted
cash
|
|
|
Cash
|
7,101
|
3,188
|
Short-term deposits
|
1,011
|
1,043
|
Restricted term-deposits in non-current assets
|
1,685
|
1,686
|
Total Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash shown in
statement of cash flows
|
$9,797
|
$5,917
|
|
|
|
1)
Amounts
reflecting adoption of ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows,
Restricted Cash (Topic 230) beginning in the first quarter of
2019.
Amounts included in restricted deposits represent the amount of
cash pledged to secure loans payable or trade financing granted by
financial institutions and serve as collateral for public utility
agreements such as electricity and water. Restricted deposits are
classified as non-current assets, as they relate to long-term
obligations and will become unrestricted only upon discharge of the
obligations.
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE AND NUMBER OF
SHARES)
1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Trio-Tech International (“the Company” or
“TTI” hereafter) was incorporated in fiscal year 1958
under the laws of the State of California. TTI provides third-party
semiconductor testing and burn-in services primarily through its
laboratories in Southeast Asia. In addition, TTI operates testing
facilities in the United States. The Company also designs,
develops, manufactures and markets a broad range of equipment and
systems used in the manufacturing and testing of semiconductor
devices and electronic components. In the first quarter of fiscal
year 2019, TTI conducted business in four business segments:
Manufacturing, Testing Services, Distribution and Real Estate. TTI
has subsidiaries in the U.S., Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand and
China as follows:
|
Ownership
|
Location
|
Express Test Corporation (Dormant)
|
100%
|
Van Nuys, California
|
Trio-Tech Reliability Services (Dormant)
|
100%
|
Van Nuys, California
|
KTS Incorporated, dba Universal Systems (Dormant)
|
100%
|
Van Nuys, California
|
European Electronic Test Centre (Dormant)
|
100%
|
Dublin, Ireland
|
Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd.
|
100%
|
Singapore
|
Universal (Far East) Pte. Ltd. *
|
100%
|
Singapore
|
Trio-Tech International (Thailand) Co. Ltd. *
|
100%
|
Bangkok, Thailand
|
Trio-Tech (Bangkok) Co. Ltd.
|
100%
|
Bangkok, Thailand
|
(49% owned by Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. and 51% owned by
Trio-Tech International (Thailand) Co. Ltd.)
|
|
|
Trio-Tech (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.
(55% owned by Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd.)
|
55%
|
Penang and Selangor, Malaysia
|
Trio-Tech (Kuala Lumpur) Sdn. Bhd.
|
55%
|
Selangor, Malaysia
|
(100% owned by Trio-Tech Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.)
|
|
|
Prestal Enterprise Sdn. Bhd.
|
76%
|
Selangor, Malaysia
|
(76% owned by Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd.)
|
|
|
Trio-Tech (SIP) Co., Ltd. *
|
100%
|
Suzhou, China
|
Trio-Tech (Chongqing) Co. Ltd. *
|
100%
|
Chongqing, China
|
SHI International Pte. Ltd. (Dormant)
(55% owned by Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd)
|
55%
|
Singapore
|
PT SHI Indonesia (Dormant)
(100% owned by SHI International Pte. Ltd.)
|
55%
|
Batam, Indonesia
|
Trio-Tech (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. *
|
100%
|
Tianjin, China
|
*
100% owned by Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd.
The accompanying un-audited condensed consolidated financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial
information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10
of Regulation S-X. All significant inter-company accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S.
dollars. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial
statements do not include all the information and footnotes
required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion
of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring
adjustments) considered necessary for fair presentation have been
included. Operating results for the three months ended September
30, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2019. For further
information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and
footnotes thereto included in the Company's annual report for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2018.
The Company’s operating results are presented based on the
translation of foreign currencies using the respective
quarter’s average exchange rate.
Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
Comparability
Effective on the first day of fiscal 2019, the company adopted
Accounting Standards Update 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with
Customers (“ASC
606”). Prior periods were not retrospectively restated, and
accordingly, the consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2018,
and the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the
three months ended September 30, 2017 were prepared using
accounting standards that were different than those in effect for
the three months ended September 30, 2018.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) issued ASC 606, which supersedes the guidance
in ASC 605, Revenue Recognition
(“ASC 605”). The Company
adopted ASU 2014-09 effective July 1, 2018 using the modified
retrospective transition approach.
The Company generates revenue primarily from 3 different segments:
Manufacturing, Testing and Distribution. The Company accounts for a
contract with a customer when there is approval and commitment from
both parties, the rights of the parties are identified, payment
terms are identified, the contract has commercial substance and
collectability of consideration is probable. The Company’s
revenues are measured based on consideration stipulated in the
arrangement with each customer, net of any sales incentives and
amounts collected on behalf of third parties, such as sales taxes.
The revenues are recognized as separate performance obligations
that are satisfied by transferring control of the product or
service to the customer.
The Company’s arrangements with its customers include various
combinations of products and services, which are generally capable
of being distinct and accounted for as separate performance
obligations. A product or service is considered distinct if it is
separately identifiable from other deliverables in the arrangement
and if a customer can benefit from it on its own or with other
resources that are readily available to the customer.
The Company allocates the transaction price to each performance
obligation on a relative standalone selling price basis (SSP). The
Company typically establishes the SSP based on observable prices of
products or services sold separately in comparable circumstances to
similar clients. The Company may estimate SSP by considering
internal costs, profit objectives and pricing practices in certain
circumstances. Warranties, discounts and allowances are estimated
using historical and recent data trends. The Company includes
estimates in the transaction price only to the extent that a
significant reversal of revenue is not probable in subsequent
periods. The Company’s products and services are generally
not sold with a right of return, nor has the Company experienced
significant returns from or refunds to its customers.
Manufacturing
The Company primarily derives revenue from the sale of both
front-end and back-end semiconductor test equipment and related
peripherals, maintenance and support of all these products,
installation and training services and the sale of spare parts. The
Company’s revenues are measured based on consideration
stipulated in the arrangement with each customer, net of any sales
incentives and amounts collected on behalf of third parties, such
as sales taxes.
The Company recognizes revenue at a point in time when the Company
has satisfied its performance obligation by transferring control of
the product to the customer. The Company uses judgment to evaluate
whether the control has transferred by considering several
indicators, including:
●
whether the Company has a present right to
payment;
●
the customer has legal title;
●
the customer has physical
possession;
●
the customer has significant risk and rewards of
ownership; and
●
the customer has accepted the product, or whether
customer acceptance is considered a formality based on history of
acceptance of similar products (for example, when the customer has
previously accepted the same equipment, with the same
specifications, and when we can objectively demonstrate that the
tool meets all of the required acceptance criteria, and when the
installation of the system is deemed
perfunctory).
Not all of the indicators need to be met for the Company to
conclude that control has transferred to the customer. In
circumstances in which revenue is recognized prior to the product
acceptance, the portion of revenue associated with its performance
obligations to install product is deferred and recognized upon
acceptance.
The majority of sales under Manufacturing segment include a
standard 12-month warranty. The Company has concluded that the
warranty provided for standard products are assurance type
warranties and are not separate performance obligations. Warranty
provided for customized products are service warranties and are
separate performance obligations. Transaction prices are allocated
to this performance obligation using cost plus method. The portion
of revenue associated with warranty service is deferred and
recognized as revenue over the warranty period, as the customer
simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits of warranty
services provided by the Company.
Testing
The Company rendered testing services to manufacturers and
purchasers of semiconductors and other entities who either lack
testing capabilities or whose in-house screening facilities are
insufficient. The Company primarily derives testing revenue from
burn-in services, manpower supply and other associated services.
Standalone Selling price is directlyobservable from the sales
orders. Revenue is allocated to performance obligations satisfied
at a point in time depending upon terms of the sales order.
Generally, there is no other performance obligation other from what
has been stated inside the sales order for each of these
sales.
Terms of contract that may indicate potential variable
consideration included warranty, late delivery penalty and
reimbursement to solve non-conformance issues for rejected
products. Based on historical and recent data trends, it is
concluded that these terms of the contract do not represent
potential variable consideration. The transaction price is not
contingent on the occurrence of any future event.
Distribution
The Company distributes complementary products particularly
equipments, industrial products and components by manufacturers
mainly from the U.S., Europe, Taiwan and Japan. The Company
recognizes revenue from product sales at a point in time when the
Company has satisfied its performance obligation by transferring
control of the product to the customer. The Company uses judgment
to evaluate whether the control has transferred by considering
several indicators discussed above. Generally, the Company
recognizes the revenue at a point in time, generally upon shipment
or delivery of the products to the customer or distributors,
depending upon terms of the sales order.
Contract Assets/Liabilities
The
timing of revenue recognition, billings and cash collections may
result in accounts receivable, contract assets, and contract
liabilities (deferred revenue) on the Company’s condensed
consolidated balance sheet. A receivable is recorded in the period
the Company delivers products or provides services when the Company
has an unconditional right to payment. Contract assets primarily
relate to the value of products and services transferred to the
customer for which the right to payment is not just dependent on
the passage of time. Contract assets are transferred to receivable
when rights to payment become unconditional. A contract liability
is recognized when the Company receives payment or has an
unconditional right to payment in advance of the satisfaction of
performance. The contract liabilities represent (1) Deferred
product revenue relates to the value of products that have been
shipped and billed to customers and for which the control has not
been transferred to the customers, and (2) Deferred service
revenue, which is recorded when the Company receives consideration,
or such consideration is unconditionally due, from a customer prior
to transferring services to the customer under the terms of a sales
contract. Deferred service revenue typically results from warranty
services, and maintenance and other service contracts.
2. NEW ACCOUNTING
PRONOUNCEMENTS
The
amendments in ASU 2018-13 ASC Topic 820: Fair Value Measurement: Disclosure
Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair
Value Measurement modify the disclosure requirements on fair
value measurements based on the concepts in the Concepts Statement,
including the consideration of costs and benefits. The amendments
on changes in unrealized gains and losses, the range and weighted
average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3
fair value measurements, and the narrative description of
measurement uncertainty should be applied prospectively for only
the most recent interim or annual period presented in the initial
fiscal year of adoption. All other amendments should be applied
retrospectively to all periods presented upon their effective date.
The amendments are effective for all entities for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those
fiscal years. While early application is permitted, including
adoption in an interim period, the Company has not elected to early
adopt. The effectiveness of this update is not expected to have a
significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
The
amendments in ASU 2018-11 ASC Topic 842: Leases: Targeted Improvements related
to transition relief on comparative reporting at adoption affect
all entities with lease contracts that choose the additional
transition method and separating components of a contract affect
only lessors whose lease contracts qualify for the practical
expedient. The amendments in ASC Topic 842 are effective for public
business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years. While early
application is permitted, including adoption in an interim period,
the Company has not elected to early adopt. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of this accounting standard update
on its consolidated financial statements.
The
amendments in ASU 2018-10 ASC Topic 842: Codification Improvements to Leases are
to address stakeholders’ questions about how to apply certain
aspects of the new guidance in Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) 842, Leases. The
clarifications address the rate implicit in the lease, impairment
of the net investment in the lease, lessee reassessment of lease
classification, lessor reassessment of lease term and purchase
options, variable payments that depend on an index or rate and
certain transition adjustments. The amendments in ASC Topic 842 are
effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal
years. While early application is permitted, including adoption in
an interim period, the Company has not elected to early adopt. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact of this accounting
standard update on its consolidated financial
statements.
The amendments in ASU 2018-09 Codification
Improvements represent changes
to clarify, correct errors in, or make minor improvements to the
Codification, eliminating inconsistencies and providing
clarifications in current guidance. The amendments in this ASU
include those made to: Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive
Income-Overall; Debt-Modifications and Extinguishments;
Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity-Overall; Compensation-Stock
Compensation-Income Taxes; Business Combinations-Income Taxes;
Derivatives and Hedging-Overall; Fair Value Measurement-Overall;
Financial Services-Brokers and Dealers-Liabilities; and Plan
Accounting-Defined Contribution Pension Plans-Investments-Other.
The amendments are effective for all entities for annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2018. The effectiveness of this update
is not expected to have a significant effect on the Company’s
consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
The
amendments in ASU 2018-02 ASC Topic 220: Income Statement – Reporting
Comprehensive Income provide financial statement preparers
with an option to reclassify stranded tax effects within
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income to retained earnings in each
period in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal
corporate income tax rate in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (or portion
thereof) is recorded. The amendments
in ASC Topic 220 are effective for public business entities for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods
within those fiscal years. While early application is
permitted, including adoption in an interim period, the
Company has not elected to early adopt. The effectiveness of this
update is not expected to have a significant effect on the
Company’s consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
The amendments in Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)
2017-11: Earnings Per Share
(Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities
from Equity (Topic
480);
Derivatives and Hedging (Topic
815) are effective for public companies for annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within
those periods. While early application is permitted, including
adoption in an interim period, the Company has not elected to early
adopt. The effectiveness of this update is not expected to have a
significant effect on the Company’s presentation of
consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
The amendments in ASU 2017-04 ASC Topic 350 —
'Intangibles - Goodwill and
Other (“ASC Topic
350”) simplify the test for goodwill impairment. For public
companies, these amendments are effective for annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within
those periods. While early application is permitted, including
adoption in an interim period, the Company has not elected to early
adopt. The effectiveness of this update is not expected to have a
significant effect on the Company’s presentation of
consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
The amendments in ASU 2016-13 ASC Topic 326: Financial Instruments —
Credit losses (“ASC Topic
326”) are issued for the measurement of all expected credit
losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on
historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and
supportable forecasts. For public companies that are not SEC
filers, ASC Topic 326 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2020, and interim periods within those fiscal years.
While early application will be permitted for all organizations for
fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years,
beginning after December 15, 2018, the Company has not yet
determined if it will early adopt. The effectiveness of this update
is not expected to have a significant effect on the Company’s
consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
The amendments in ASU 2016-02 ASC Topic 842: Leases require companies to recognize the following for
all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the
commencement date of the applicable lease: (a) a lease liability,
which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising
from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and (b) a
right-of-use asset, which is as an asset that represents the
lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified
asset for the lease term. These amendments become effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim
periods within those fiscal years, for a variety of entities
including a public company. While early adoption is permitted, the
Company has not elected to early adopt. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of this accounting standard update on its
consolidated financial statements.
Other new pronouncements issued but not yet effective until after
September 30, 2018 are not expected to have a significant effect on
the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
3. TERM
DEPOSITS
|
Sep.
30,
2018
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term
deposits
|
$1,024
|
$606
|
Currency
translation effect on short-term deposits
|
(13)
|
47
|
Total short-term deposits
|
1,011
|
653
|
Restricted
term deposits
|
1,696
|
1,664
|
Currency
translation effect on restricted term deposits
|
(11)
|
31
|
Total restricted term deposits
|
1,685
|
1,695
|
Total term deposits
|
$2,696
|
$2,348
|
Restricted deposits represent the amount of cash pledged to secure
loans payable granted by financial institutions and serve as
collateral for public utility agreements such as electricity and
water. Restricted deposits are classified as non-current assets, as
they relate to long-term obligations and will become unrestricted
only upon discharge of the obligations. Short-term deposits
represent bank deposits, which do not qualify as cash
equivalents.
4. TRADE ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND ALLOWANCE FOR
DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
Accounts receivable consists of customer obligations due under
normal trade terms. Although management generally does not require
collateral, letters of credit may be required from the customers in
certain circumstances. Management periodically performs credit
evaluations of customers’ financial conditions.
Senior management reviews accounts receivable on a periodic basis
to determine if any receivables will potentially be uncollectible.
Management includes any accounts receivable balances that are
determined to be uncollectible in the allowance for doubtful
accounts. After all reasonable attempts to collect a receivable
have failed, the receivable is written off against the
allowance. Based on the information available,
management believed the allowance for doubtful accounts as of
September 30, 2018 and June 30, 2018 was
adequate.
The following table represents the changes in the allowance for
doubtful accounts:
|
Sept.
30,
2018
(Unaudited)
|
|
Beginning
|
$259
|
$247
|
Additions charged
to expenses
|
-
|
8
|
Recovered
|
(2)
|
(1)
|
Write-off
|
-
|
-
|
Currency
translation effect
|
(8)
|
5
|
Ending
|
$249
|
$259
|
5. LOANS RECEIVABLE FROM PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT
PROJECTS
The following table presents Trio-Tech (Chongqing) Co. Ltd
(“TTCQ”)’s loan receivable from property
development projects in China as of September 30, 2018. The
exchange rate is based on the date published by the
Monetary Authority of Singapore as of March 31, 2015, since the net
loan receivable was “nil” as of September 30,
2018.
|
|
|
Loan Amount
(U.S. Dollars)
|
Short-term loan receivables
|
|
|
|
JiangHuai
(Project – Yu Jin Jiang An)
|
May
31, 2013
|
2,000
|
325
|
Less:
allowance for doubtful receivables
|
|
(2,000)
|
(325)
|
Net loan receivables from property development
projects
|
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Long-term loan receivables
|
|
|
|
Jun
Zhou Zhi Ye
|
Oct
31, 2016
|
5,000
|
814
|
Less:
transfer – down-payment for purchase of investment
property
|
|
(5,000)
|
(814)
|
Net loan receivables from property development
projects
|
|
-
|
-
|
On November 1, 2010, TTCQ entered into a Memorandum Agreement with
JiangHuai Property Development Co. Ltd. (“JiangHuai”)
to invest in their property development projects (Project - Yu Jin
Jiang An) located in Chongqing City, China. Due to the short-term
nature of the investment, the amount was classified as a loan based
on ASC Topic 310-10-25 Receivables, amounting to renminbi (“RMB”) 2,000,
or approximately $325. The loan was renewed but expired on May 31,
2013. TTCQ is in the legal process of recovering the outstanding
amount of $325. TTCQ did not generate other income from JiangHuai
for the quarter ended September 30, 2018 or for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2018. Based on TTI’s financial policy, a
provision for doubtful receivables of $325 on the investment in
JiangHuai was recorded during the second quarter of fiscal 2014
based on TTI’s financial policy. TTCQ is in the legal process
of recovering the outstanding amount of $325.
On November 1, 2010, TTCQ entered into a Memorandum Agreement with
JiaSheng Property Development Co. Ltd. (“JiaSheng”) to
invest in their property development projects (Project B-48 Phase
2) located in Chongqing City, China. Due to the short-term nature
of the investment, the amount was classified as a loan based on ASC
Topic 310, amounting to RMB 5,000, or approximately $814 based on
the exchange rate as at March 31, 2015 published by the Monetary
Authority of Singapore. The amount was unsecured and repayable at
the end of the term. The loan was renewed in November 2011 for a
period of one year, which expired on October 31, 2012 and was again
renewed in November 2012 and expired in November 2013. On November
1, 2013 the loan was transferred by JiaSheng to, and is now payable
by, Chong Qing Jun Zhou Zhi Ye Co. Ltd. (“Jun Zhou Zhi
Ye”), and the transferred agreement expired on October 31,
2016. Prior to the second quarter of fiscal year 2015, the loan
receivable was classified as a long-term receivable. The book value
of the loan receivable approximates its fair value. In the second
quarter of fiscal year 2015, the loan receivable was transferred to
down payment for purchase of investment property that is being
developed in the Singapore Themed Resort Project (see Note
8).
6. INVENTORIES
Inventories consisted of the following:
|
Sept.
30,
2018
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Raw
materials
|
$1,176
|
$1,153
|
Work
in progress
|
1,654
|
1,947
|
Finished
goods
|
261
|
505
|
Currency
translation effect
|
(11)
|
20
|
Less:
provision for obsolete inventory
|
(694)
|
(695)
|
|
$2,386
|
$2,930
|
The following table represents the changes in provision for
obsolete inventory:
|
Sept.
30,
2018
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
$695
|
$686
|
Additions
charged to expenses
|
-
|
9
|
Usage
– disposition
|
(1)
|
(5)
|
Currency
translation effect
|
-
|
5
|
Ending
|
$694
|
$695
|
7. ASSETS HELD FOR
SALE
Penang Property
During
the fourth quarter of 2015, the operations in Malaysia planned to
sell its factory building in Penang, Malaysia. In accordance with
ASC Topic 360, during fiscal year 2015 the property was
reclassified from investment property, which had a net book value
of RM 371, or approximately $98, to assets held for sale, since
there was an intention to sell the factory building. In May 2015,
Trio-Tech Malaysia was approached by a potential buyer to purchase
the factory building. On September 14, 2015, application to sell
the property was rejected by Penang Development Corporation (PDC).
The rejection was because the business activity of the purchaser
was not suitable to the industry that is being promoted on said
property. PDC made an offer to purchase the property, which was not
at the expected value and the offer expired on March 28, 2016. The
last conversation with PDC was on 24th July 2018, there
has been no news from PDC to confirm their interest in buying the
property as of Sep 30, 2018. During the first quarter of fiscal
year 2019, there was an interested buyer to purchase the property;
however, the purchase was not consummated as the potential buyer
was unable to obtain financing. . As of the end of the first
quarter of fiscal year 2019, management is working closely with two
agents to search for potential buyers. The net book values of the
building were RM371, or $89, as at September 30, 2018 and RM 371,
or $91, as at June 30, 2018.
Mao Ye Property
During the first quarter of 2019, management decided to sell our
Mao Ye Property, which is one of our earlier investment properties.
In order to monetize the capital gain on property, TTCQ appointed a
sole agent for 6 months as of September 1, 2018 to search for
suitable buyers for this property. The
Company believes that it has the ability to complete the sale
transaction within a period of one year since the asset can be
transferred to the buyer in its present condition and the target
price given to the sole agent is reasonable in relation to its
current fair value. In
accordance with ASC Topic 360, as there was an intention to sell
the investment properties within 1 year, the property was
reclassified from investment property, which had a net book value
of RMB 2,729, or approximately $397 as at September 30,2018 and RMB
2,729, or approximately $412 as at June 30,2018 to assets held for
sale.
8. INVESTMENTS
During the second quarter of fiscal year 2011, the Company
entered into a joint venture agreement with JiaSheng to develop
real estate projects in China. The Company invested RMB 10,000, or
approximately $1,606 based on the exchange rate as of March 31,
2014 published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore, for a 10%
interest in the newly formed joint venture, which was incorporated
as a limited liability company, Chong Qing Jun Zhou Zhi Ye Co. Ltd.
(the “joint venture”), in China. The agreement
stipulated that the Company would nominate two of the five members
of the Board of Directors of the joint venture and had the ability
to assign two members of management to the joint venture. The
agreement also stipulated that the Company would receive a fee of
RMB 10,000, or approximately $1,606 based on the exchange rate as
of March 31, 2014, published by the Monetary Authority of
Singapore, for the services rendered in connection with bidding in
certain real estate projects from the local government. Upon
signing of the agreement, JiaSheng paid the Company RMB 5,000 in
cash, or approximately $803 based on the exchange rate published by
the Monetary Authority of Singapore as of March 31, 2014. The
remaining RMB 5,000, which was not recorded as a receivable as the
Company considered the collectability uncertain, would be paid over
72 months commencing in 36 months from the date of the agreement
when the joint venture secured a property development project
stated inside the joint venture agreement. The Company considered
the RMB 5,000, or approximately $803 based on the exchange rate as
of March 31, 2014 published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore,
received in cash from JiaSheng, the controlling venturer in the
joint venture, as a partial return of the Company’s initial
investment of RMB 10,000, or approximately $1,606 based on the
exchange rate as of March 31, 2014 published by the Monetary
Authority of Singapore. Therefore, the RMB 5,000 received in cash
was offset against the initial investment of RMB 10,000, resulting
in a net investment of RMB 5,000 as of March 31, 2014. The Company
further reduced its investments by RMB 137, or approximately $22,
towards the losses from operations incurred by the joint venture,
resulting in a net investment of RMB 4,863, or approximately $781
based on exchange rates published by the Monetary Authority of
Singapore as of March 31, 2014.
“Investments”
in the real estate segment were the cost of an investment in a
joint venture in which we had a 10% interest. During the second
quarter of fiscal year 2014, TTCQ disposed of its 10% interest in
the joint venture. The joint venture had to raise funds for the
development of the project. As a joint-venture partner, TTCQ was
required to stand guarantee for the funds to be borrowed;
considering the amount of borrowing, the risk involved was higher
than the investment made, hence TTCQ decided to dispose of the 10%
interest in the joint venture investment. On October 2, 2013, TTCQ
entered into a share transfer agreement (the “Share Transfer
Agreement”) with Zhu Shu. Based on the agreement, the
purchase price was to be paid by (1) RMB 10,000 worth of commercial
property in Chongqing China, or approximately $1,634 based on
exchange rates published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore as
of October 2, 2013, by non-monetary consideration and (2) the
remaining RMB 8,000, or approximately $1,307 based on exchange
rates published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore as of
October 2, 2013, by cash consideration. The consideration consisted
of (1) commercial units measuring 668 square meters to be delivered
in June 2016 and (2) sixteen quarterly equal installments of RMB
500 per quarter commencing from January 2014. Based on ASC Topic
845 Non-monetary Consideration, the Company deferred the
recognition of the gain on disposal of the 10% interest in joint
venture investment until such time that the consideration is paid,
so that the gain can be ascertained. The recorded value of the
disposed investment amounting to $783, based on exchange rates
published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore as of June 30,
2014, is classified as “other assets” under non-current
assets, because it is considered a down payment for the purchase of
the commercial property in Chongqing. The first three installments,
amounting to RMB 500 each due in January 2014, April 2014 and July
2014, were all outstanding until the date of disposal of the
investment in the joint venture. Out of the outstanding RMB 8,000,
TTCQ received RMB 100 during May 2014.
On
October 14, 2014, TTCQ and Jun Zhou Zhi Ye entered into a
memorandum of understanding. Based on the memorandum of
understanding, both parties agreed to register a sales and purchase
agreement upon Jun Zhou Zhi Ye obtaining the license to sell the
commercial property (the Singapore Themed Resort Project) located
in Chongqing, China. The proposed agreement is for the sale of shop
lots with a total area of 1,484.55 square meters as consideration
for the outstanding amounts owed to TTCQ by Jun Zhou Zhi Ye as
follows:
a) Long
term loan receivable RMB 5,000, or approximately $814, as disclosed
in Note 5, plus the interest receivable on long term loan
receivable of RMB 1,250;
b)
Commercial units measuring 668 square meters, as mentioned above;
and
c) RMB
5,900 for the part of the unrecognized cash consideration of RMB
8,000 relating to the disposal of the joint venture.
The
consideration does not include the remaining outstanding amount of
RMB 2,000, or approximately $326, which will be paid to TTCQ in
cash.
The
shop lots are to be delivered to TTCQ upon completion of the
construction of the shop lots in the Singapore Themed Resort
Project. The initial targeted date of completion was December 31,
2016. Based on discussions with the developers, the completion date
is currently estimated to be December 31, 2019.
The
Share Transfer Agreement (10% interest in the joint venture) was
registered with the relevant authorities in China during October
2016.
9. INVESTMENT
PROPERTIES
The following table presents the Company’s investment in
properties in China as of September 30, 2018. The exchange rate is
based on the market rate as of September 30, 2018.
|
Investment
Date / Reclassification Date
|
|
Investment Amount
(U.S. Dollars)
|
Purchase
of rental property – Property I - MaoYe
Property
|
Jan
04, 2008
|
5,554
|
894
|
Purchase
of rental property – Property II -
JiangHuai
|
Jan
06, 2010
|
3,600
|
580
|
Purchase
of rental property – Property III - Fu Li
|
Apr
08, 2010
|
4,025
|
648
|
Reclassification
of Mao Ye Property as "Asset held for sale"
|
July
01, 2018
|
(5,554)
|
(894)
|
Currency
translation
|
|
-
|
(118)
|
Gross
investment in rental property
|
|
7,625
|
1,110
|
Accumulated
depreciation on rental property
|
Sep
30, 2018
|
(5,691)
|
(889)
|
Reclassified
as "Asset for sale"
|
July
01, 2018
|
2,822
|
472
|
Net investment in property – China
|
|
4,756
|
693
|
The following table presents the Company’s investment in
properties in China as of June 30, 2018. The exchange rate is based
on the market rate as of June 30, 2018.
|
|
|
Investment Amount
(U.S. Dollars)
|
Purchase
of rental property – Property I - MaoYe
Property
|
Jan
04, 2008
|
5,554
|
894
|
Purchase
of rental property – Property II -
JiangHuai
|
Jan
06, 2010
|
3,600
|
580
|
Purchase
of rental property – Property III - Fu Li
|
Apr
08, 2010
|
4,025
|
648
|
Currency
translation
|
|
-
|
(131)
|
Gross
investment in rental property
|
|
13,179
|
1,991
|
Accumulated
depreciation on rental property
|
June
30, 2018
|
(5,596)
|
(845)
|
Net investment in property – China
|
|
7,583
|
1,146
|
The following table presents the Company’s investment
properties in Malaysia as of September 30, 2018 and June 30, 2018.
The exchange rate is based on the exchange rate as of June 30, 2015
published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
|
|
|
Investment Amount
(U.S.
Dollars)
|
Reclassification
of Penang Property I
|
Dec
31, 2012
|
681
|
181
|
Gross
investment in rental property
|
|
681
|
181
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
depreciation on rental property
|
June
30, 2015
|
(310)
|
(83)
|
Reclassified
as “Assets held for sale”
|
June
30, 2015
|
(371)
|
(98)
|
Net
investment in rental property - Malaysia
|
|
-
|
-
|
Rental Property I - Mao Ye Property
In
fiscal 2008, TTCQ purchased an office in Chongqing, China from
MaoYe Property Ltd. (“MaoYe”), for a total cash
purchase price of RMB 5,554, or approximately $894. TTCQ identified
a new tenant and signed a new rental agreement (653 square meters
at a monthly rent of RMB 39, or approximately $6) on August 1,
2015. This rental agreement provides for a rent increase of 5%
every year on January 31, commencing with 2017 until the rental
agreement expires on July 31, 2020. TTCQ signed a new rental
agreement (451 square meters at a monthly rent of RMB 24, or
approximately $4) on February 1, 2018. This rental agreement
provides for a rent increase of 6% from the second year of the
contract onwards until the rental agreement expires on January 31,
2021.
During
the first quarter of 2019, management decided to sell our Mao Ye
Property, which is one of our earlier investment properties. In
order to monetize the capital gain on property, TTCQ appointed a
sole agent for 6 months as of September 1, 2018 to search for
suitable buyers for this property. The Company believes that it has
the ability to complete the sale transaction within a period of one
year since the asset can be transferred to the buyer in its present
condition and the target price given to the sole agent is
reasonable in relation to its current fair value. In accordance
with ASC Topic 360, as there was an intention to sell the
investment properties within 1 year, the property was reclassified
from investment property, which had a net book value of RMB 2,729,
or approximately $397 as at September 30,2018 and RMB 2,729, or
approximately $412 as at June 30,2018 to assets held for
sale.
Property
purchased from MaoYe generated a rental income of $22 during the
three months ended September 30, 2018 as compared to $27 for the
same period in last fiscal year.
Rental Property II - JiangHuai
In fiscal year 2010, TTCQ purchased eight units of commercial
property in Chongqing, China from Chongqing JiangHuai Real Estate
Development Co. Ltd. (“JiangHuai”) for a total purchase
price of RMB 3,600, or approximately $580. TTCQ rented all of these
commercial units to a third party until the agreement expired in
January 2012. TTCQ then rented three of the eight commercial units
to another party during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2013
under a rental agreement that expired on March 31, 2014. Currently
all the units are vacant and TTCQ is working with the developer to
find a suitable buyer to purchase all the commercial units. TTCQ
has yet to receive the title deed for these properties; however,
TTCQ has the vacancies in possession with the exception of two
units, which are in the process of clarification. TTCQ is in the
legal process to obtain the title deed, which is dependent on
JiangHuai completing the entire project. In August 2016, TTCQ
performed a valuation on one of the commercial units and its market
value was higher than the carrying amount.
Property purchased from JiangHuai did not generate any rental
income during the three months ended September 30, 2018 or during
the same period in the prior fiscal year.
Rental Property III – FuLi
In fiscal 2010, TTCQ entered into a Memorandum Agreement with
Chongqing FuLi Real Estate Development Co. Ltd.
(“FuLi”) to purchase two commercial properties totaling
311.99 square meters (“office space”) located in Jiang
Bei District Chongqing. Although TTCQ currently rents its office
premises from a third party, it intends to use the office space as
its office premises. The total purchase price committed and paid
was RMB 4,025, or approximately $648. The development was
completed, and the property was handed over in April 2013 and the
title deed was received during the third quarter of fiscal
2014.
The two commercial properties were leased to third parties under
two separate rental agreements, one of which expires in April 2019
and provides for a rent increase of 5% every year on May 1,
commencing in 2017 until the rental agreement expires on April 30,
2019 and the other of which expired in March 31, 2018. Management
continues to follow-up closely on getting a new tenant for this
vacant unit despite the slow current market rental
situation.
Properties purchased from Fu Li generated a rental income of $5 for
the three months ended September 30, 2018, and $12 for the same
period in the last fiscal year.
Summary
Total rental income for all investment properties in China was $27
for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and $39 for the same
period in the last fiscal year.
Depreciation expenses for all investment properties in China were
$14 for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and $25 for the
same period in the last fiscal year.
10. OTHER ASSETS
Other
assets consisted of the following:
|
Sept.
30, 2018
(Unaudited)
|
|
Down
payment for purchase of investment properties
|
$1,645
|
$1,645
|
Down
payment for purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
44
|
561
|
Deposits
for rental and utilities
|
140
|
140
|
Currency
translation effect
|
(165)
|
(97)
|
Total
|
$1,664
|
$2,249
|
11. LINES OF CREDIT
Carrying value of the Company’s lines of credit approximates
its fair value because the interest rates associated with the lines
of credit are adjustable in accordance with market situations when
the Company borrowed funds with similar terms and remaining
maturities.
The Company’s credit rating provides it with readily and
adequate access to funds in global markets.
As of September 30, 2018, the Company had certain lines of credit
that are collateralized by restricted deposits.
Entity with
|
Type of
|
|
|
|
|
Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trio-Tech
International Pte. Ltd., Singapore
|
Lines of
Credit
|
Ranging from
1.6% to 5.5%
|
-
|
$4,169
|
$3,307
|
Trio-Tech
(Tianjin) Co., Ltd.
|
Lines of
Credit
|
5.22%
|
-
|
$1,456
|
$434
|
Universal (Far East) Pte.
Ltd.
|
Lines of
Credit
|
Ranging from
1.6% to 5.5%
|
-
|
$366
|
$117
|
As of June 30, 2018, the Company had certain lines of credit that
are collateralized by restricted deposits.
Entity with
|
Type of
|
|
|
|
|
Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trio-Tech
International Pte. Ltd., Singapore
|
Lines of
Credit
|
Ranging
from
1.6% to
5.5%
|
-
|
$4,183
|
$3,325
|
Trio-Tech
(Tianjin) Co., Ltd.
|
Lines of
Credit
|
5.22%
|
-
|
$1,511
|
$437
|
Universal (Far East) Pte.
Ltd.
|
Lines of
Credit
|
Ranging
from
1.6% to
5.5%
|
-
|
$367
|
$256
|
On January 4, 2018, Trio-Tech International Pte. Ltd. signed an
agreement with a bank to sub-allocate a portion of the facility
thereunder to its subsidiary - Universal (Far East) Pte. Ltd. for
an Accounts Payable Financing facility for SGD 500, or
approximately $367 based on the market exchange rate. Interest is
charged at 1.6% to 5.5%. The financing facility was set up to
facilitate the working capital in our operations in Singapore. The
Company started to use this facility in fiscal year
2018.
12. ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accrued
expenses consisted of the following:
|
Sept. 30,
2018
(Unaudited)
|
|
Payroll
and related costs
|
$1,488
|
$1,545
|
Commissions
|
68
|
89
|
Customer
deposits
|
518
|
17
|
Legal
and audit
|
274
|
265
|
Sales
tax
|
20
|
17
|
Utilities
|
139
|
130
|
Warranty
|
69
|
82
|
Accrued
purchase of materials and property, plant and
equipment
|
394
|
454
|
Provision
for re-instatement
|
294
|
289
|
Other
accrued expenses
|
367
|
203
|
Currency
translation effect
|
(60)
|
81
|
Total
|
$3,571
|
$3,172
|
13. WARRANTY ACCRUAL
The Company provides for the estimated costs that may be incurred
under its warranty program at the time the sale is
recorded. The warranty period of the products
manufactured by the Company is generally one year or the warranty
period agreed with the customer. The Company estimates
the warranty costs based on the historical rates of warranty
returns. The Company periodically assesses the adequacy of its
recorded warranty liability and adjusts the amounts as
necessary.
|
Sept.
30,
2018
(Unaudited)
|
|
Beginning
|
$82
|
$48
|
Additions
charged to cost and expenses
|
-
|
64
|
Reversal
|
(13)
|
(30)
|
Currency
translation effect
|
-
|
-
|
Ending
|
$69
|
$82
|
14. BANK LOANS PAYABLE
Bank loans payable consisted of the following:
|
Sept.
30, 2018
(Unaudited)
|
|
Note
payable denominated in RM for expansion plans in Malaysia, maturing
in August 2028, bearing interest at the bank’s prime rate
less 1.50% (5.00% at September 30, 2018 and June 30, 2018) per
annum, with monthly payments of principal plus interest through
August 2028, collateralized by the acquired building with a
carrying value of $5,666 and 2,809, as at September 30, 2018 and
June 30, 2018, respectively.
|
2,935
|
1,615
|
|
|
|
Note
payable denominated in U.S. dollars for expansion plans in
Singapore and its subsidiaries, maturing in April 2020, bearing
interest at the bank’s lending rate (3.96% for September 30,
2018 and June 30, 2018) with monthly payments of principal plus
interest through June 2020. This note payable is secured by plant
and equipment with a carrying value of $177 and $187, as at
September 30, 2018 and June 30, 2018, respectively.
|
254
|
293
|
|
|
|
Total bank loans payable
|
$3,189
|
$1,908
|
Current
portion of bank loan payable
|
486
|
380
|
Currency
translation effect on current portion of bank loan
|
(8)
|
(13)
|
Current portion of bank loan payable
|
478
|
367
|
Long
term portion of bank loan payable
|
2,703
|
1,528
|
Currency
translation effect on long-term portion of bank loan
|
(56)
|
(91)
|
Long term portion of bank loans payable
|
$2,647
|
$1,437
|
Future minimum payments (excluding interest) as at September 30,
2018 were as follows:
2019
|
$478
|
2020
|
449
|
2021
|
363
|
2022
|
382
|
2023
|
401
|
Thereafter
|
1,052
|
Total
obligations and commitments
|
$3,125
|
Future minimum payments (excluding interest) as at June 30, 2018
were as follows:
2019
|
$367
|
2020
|
372
|
2021
|
242
|
2022
|
254
|
2023
|
267
|
Thereafter
|
302
|
Total
obligations and commitments
|
$1,804
|
15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Trio-Tech
(Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. has capital commitments for the purchase of
equipment and other related infrastructure costs amounting to RM
62, or approximately $15, based on the exchange rate as at
September 30, 2018, as compared to the capital commitment as at
June 30, 2018 amounting to RM 62, or approximately
$16.
Trio-Tech (Tianjin) Co. Ltd. in China has capital commitments for
the purchase of equipment and other related infrastructure costs
amounting to RMB 2,379, or approximately $346, based on the
exchange rate as on September 30, 2018, as compared to the capital
commitment as at June 30, 2018 amounting to RMB 3,927, or
approximately $593.
Trio-Tech (SIP) Co., Ltd. in China has capital commitments for the
purchase of equipment and other related infrastructure costs
amounting to RMB 6,341, or approximately $923, based on the
exchange rate as on September 30, 2018 as compared to the capital
commitment as at June 30, 2018 amounting to RMB 6,084, or
approximately $919.
Deposits with banks in China are not insured by the local
government or agency, and are consequently exposed to risk of loss.
The Company believes the probability of a bank failure, causing
loss to the Company, is remote.
The Company is, from time to time, the subject of litigation claims
and assessments arising out of matters occurring in its normal
business operations. In the opinion of management, resolution of
these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the
Company’s financial statements.
16. BUSINESS
SEGMENTS
In fiscal year 2019, the Company operates in four segments; the
testing service industry (which performs structural and electronic
tests of semiconductor devices), the designing and manufacturing of
equipment (which equipment tests the structural integrity of
integrated circuits and other products), distribution of various
products from other manufacturers in Singapore and Southeast Asia,
and the real estate segment in China.
The revenue allocated to individual countries was based on where
the customers were located. The allocation of the cost of
equipment, the current year investment in new equipment and
depreciation expense have been made on the basis of the primary
purpose for which the equipment was acquired.
All inter-segment revenue was from the manufacturing segment to the
testing and distribution segments. Total inter-segment revenue was
$285 for the three months ended September 30, 2018, as compared to
$95 for the same period in the last fiscal
year. Corporate assets mainly consisted of cash and
prepaid expenses. Corporate expenses mainly consisted of stock
option expenses, salaries, insurance, professional expenses and
directors' fees. Corporate expenses are allocated to the four
segments. The following segment information table includes segment
operating income or loss after including the corporate expenses
allocated to the segments, which gets eliminated in the
consolidation.
The following segment information is un-audited for the three
months ended September 30, 2018 and September 30,
2017:
Business Segment Information:
|
Three
Months
Ended
Sept.
30,
|
|
Operating
Income
/ (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
$3,637
|
107
|
8,566
|
29
|
1
|
|
2017
|
$4,765
|
186
|
8,194
|
28
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
4,437
|
(138)
|
24,200
|
512
|
1,213
|
|
2017
|
4,605
|
336
|
22,129
|
447
|
494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
1,944
|
172
|
656
|
-
|
-
|
|
2017
|
1,536
|
101
|
573
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
27
|
(12)
|
3,441
|
14
|
-
|
|
2017
|
39
|
(10)
|
3,568
|
25
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
-
|
-
|
25
|
-
|
-
|
|
2017
|
-
|
-
|
28
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
-
|
(6)
|
151
|
-
|
-
|
|
2017
|
-
|
(66)
|
214
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
$10,045
|
123
|
37,039
|
555
|
1,214
|
|
2017
|
$10,945
|
547
|
34,706
|
500
|
529
|
* Fabrication Services is a discontinued operation.
17. OTHER
INCOME
Other income consisted of the following:
|
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
10
|
8
|
Other
rental income
|
27
|
26
|
Exchange
loss
|
(39)
|
(6)
|
Bad
debt recovery
|
2
|
1
|
Other
miscellaneous income
|
43
|
129
|
Total
|
$43
|
$158
|
18. INCOME TAX
The
Company is subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous foreign
jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining the
provision for income taxes and income tax assets and liabilities,
including evaluating uncertainties in the application of accounting
principles and complex tax laws. The statute of limitations, in
general, is open for years 2014 to 2017 for tax authorities in
those jurisdictions to audit or examine income tax returns. The
Company is under annual review by the tax authorities of the
respective jurisdiction to which the subsidiaries
belong.
The Tax
Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) was enacted on
December 22, 2017, and permanently reduces the U.S. federal
corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, eliminated corporate
Alternative Minimum Tax, modified rules for expensing capital
investment, and limited the deduction of interest expense for
certain companies. The Act is a fundamental change to the taxation
of multinational companies, including a shift from a system of
worldwide taxation with some deferral elements to a territorial
system, current taxation of certain foreign income, a minimum tax
on low tax foreign earnings, and new measures to curtail base
erosion and promote U.S. production.
As the
Company has a June 30 fiscal year end, the lower corporate income
tax rate will be phased in, resulting in a lower U.S. statutory
federal rate. In accordance with Section 15 of the Internal Revenue
Code, the Company applied a blended U.S. statutory federal income
tax rate of 27.55% for the year ended June 30, 2018. Accounting
Standard Codification (“ASC”) 740 requires filers to
record the effect of tax law changes in the period enacted. The
Company recognized income tax expenses of $900 related to the
one-time deemed repatriation. No expenses have been recognized
related to the deferred tax re-measurement and minimum tax on low
tax foreign earnings. However, the SEC issued Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”), that permits filers who
may not have the necessary information available, prepared, or
analyzed (including computations) for certain income tax effects of
the Act in order to determine a reasonable estimate to be recorded
as provisional amounts during a measurement period ending no later
than one year from the date of enactment. Accordingly, the Company
has recorded an estimated $900 and will finalize the accounting for
the tax impact of the Tax Act no later than the end of the
permitted measurement period under the SAB 118.
Discussion
of the certain material provisions affecting the Company is
provided below.
One-Time Mandatory
Repatriation
One of the effects of the Tax Act is to transition from a
world-wide to a territorial tax system. The Tax Act requires a
mandatory one-time repatriation of certain post-1986 earnings and
profits that were deferred from U.S. taxation by the
Company’s foreign subsidiaries. The basis of the tax is on
cash held and specified assets which are taxed at 15.5% and 8%,
respectively. The Company has elected to pay the Repatriation Tax
over an 8-year period.
We recorded an estimated $900 charge in fiscal 2018 related to the
one-time transition tax on the deemed repatriation of deferred
foreign income, which was included in the provision for income
taxes on our consolidated income statements and income taxes on our
consolidated balance sheets, based on existing tax laws and the
best information available as of the date of estimate.
As of September 30, 2018, we have not completed our accounting for
the estimated tax effects of one-time mandatory repatriation tax,
as our analysis of deferred foreign income and foreign tax credit
is not complete. Due to the timing of enactment and complexity in
applying the provisions of the Tax Act, the provisional net charge
is subject to revisions as we continue to complete our analysis of
the Tax Act, collect and prepare necessary data, and interpret
additional guidance issued by the U.S Treasury Department, IRS,
FASB, and other standard-setting and regulatory bodies. Adjustments
may materially impact our provision for income taxes and effective
tax rate in the period in which the adjustments are
made.
The final impact of the Tax Act may differ, possibly materially,
due to factors such as changes in interpretations and assumptions
that the company has made in its assessment, further refinement of
the company’s calculations, additional guidance that may be
issued by the U.S. government, among other items. The company has
not completed its assessment and the tax charge remains provisional
as of September 30, 2018.
Our accounting for the estimated tax effects will be completed
during the measurement period, which should not extend beyond one
year from the enactment date.
Minimum Tax on Low
Tax Foreign Earnings
The Tax
Act implemented the inclusion in gross income for the Global
Intangible Low-Tax Income (GILTI) for any taxable year beginning on
or after January 1, 2018. This provision significantly expands
current taxation of foreign subsidiary corporate earnings. The
Company must generally include in current income all earnings of
the foreign subsidiaries in excess of the assumed deemed return on
tangible assets of the foreign subsidiaries. Given the complexity
of GILTI provision, the company is still assessing the effects of
the provisions to determine whether to elect to either provide for
the minimum tax as future income tax expense as a period expense or
as a deferred tax on the related investment in foreign
subsidiaries.
Deferred Tax
Re-Measurement
The
re-measurement is based on the expected reversals of the deferred
taxes at the estimated US federal tax rates of 28% for the current
fiscal year and 21% for future fiscal years. As the Company
established a full valuation allowance on the U.S. deferred tax
assets, the Company has not recognized any income tax effects for
the deferred tax re-measurement under the Tax Act. Our accounting
for the any possible income tax effects for the deferred tax
re-measurement will be completed during the measurement period,
which should not extend beyond one year from the enactment
date.
The
Company accrues penalties and interest related to unrecognized tax
benefits when necessary as a component of penalties and interest
expenses, respectively. The Company had not accrued any penalties
or interest expenses relating to unrecognized benefits as of
September 30, 2018.
19. REVENUE
Method and Impact of Adoption
Effective as of July 1, 2018, the Company adopted
ASU 2014-09,
Revenue from contracts with Customers (Topic
606), and its related
amendments using the modified retrospective transition method. This
method was applied to contracts that were not complete as of the
date of adoption. Under the modified retrospective transition
approach, periods prior to the adoption date were not adjusted and
continue to be reported in accordance with ASC
605.
An assessment was made on the impact of all existing arrangements
as at the date of adoption, under ASC 606, to identify the
cumulative effect of applying ASC 606 on the beginning retained
earnings. The Company quantified the impact of the adoption on
its’ financial position, results of operations and cash flow.
The impact amounted to 0.06% of fiscal 2018 sales or $28, which is
immaterial to the Company. Hence, based on materiality
principle, the Company concluded that the cumulative adjustment is
not required to be made to the Company’s Beginning Retained
Earnings.
The impact is primarily driven by the changes related to the
accounting of standard warranty. Prior to adoption of ASC 606, the
Company accounted for the estimated warranty cost as a charge to
costs of sales when revenue was recognized. Upon adoption of ASC
606, the standard warranty for customized products is recognized as
a separate performance obligation.
We have completed our adoption and implemented policies, processes
and controls to support the standard’s measurement and
disclosure requirements. We recognize net product revenue when we
satisfy obligations as evidenced by the transfer of control of our
products and services to customers. The guidance did not have
material impact on the company’s consolidated financial
results.
Contract Balances
The timing of revenue recognition, billings and collections may
result in billed accounts receivable, unbilled receivables
(contract assets), and customer advances and deposits (contract
liabilities). As of July 1, 2018, deferred income amounting to $260
was reclassified from trade receivables to contract assets and
customer deposits amounting to $31 was reclassified from accrued
expenses to contract liabilities in order to establish the new
opening balance for contract assets and liabilities.
The Company’s payment terms and conditions vary by contract
type, although terms generally include a requirement of payment of
70% to 90% of total contract consideration within 30 to 60 days of
shipment, with the remainder payable within 30 days of acceptance.
In instances where the timing of revenue recognition differs from
the timing of invoicing, the Company has determined that its
contracts generally do not include a significant financing
component.
Contract assets were recorded
under other receivable while contract liabilities were recorded
under accrued expenses in the balance
sheet.
The
following table summarizes the effects of adopting ASU 2014-09 as
an adjustment to the opening balance.
|
|
|
Opening as at
July 1, 2018
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
Trade
Accounts Receivable
|
8,007
|
(260)
|
7,747
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Receivables
|
|
|
|
Others
|
621
|
-
|
621
|
Contract
Assets
|
-
|
260
|
260
|
Total
|
621
|
260
|
881
|
|
|
|
Opening as at
July 1, 2018
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
Accounts
Payable
|
3,704
|
-
|
3,704
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
Expenses
|
|
|
|
Others
|
3,172
|
(31)
|
3,141
|
Contract
Liabilities
|
-
|
31
|
31
|
Total
|
3,172
|
-
|
3,172
|
The
following table is the reconciliation of contract
balances.
|
Sept.
30,
2018
(Unaudited)
|
|
Trade
Accounts Receivable
|
8,121
|
7,747
|
Accounts
Payable
|
2,939
|
3,704
|
Contract
Assets
|
271
|
260
|
Contract
Liabilities
|
485
|
31
|
20. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The Company adopted ASC Topic 260, Earnings Per Share.
Basic Earnings Per Share
(“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income available to
common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding (denominator) during the
period. Diluted EPS give effect to all dilutive
potential common shares outstanding during a period. In
computing diluted EPS, the average price for the period is used in
determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the
exercise of stock options and warrants.
The following table is a reconciliation of the weighted average
shares used in the computation of basic and diluted EPS for the
years presented herein:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
attributable to Trio-Tech International common shareholders from
continuing operations, net of tax
|
$69
|
$576
|
Loss
attributable to Trio-Tech International common shareholders from
discontinued operations, net of tax
|
(4)
|
(1)
|
Net income attributable to Trio-Tech International common
shareholders
|
$65
|
$575
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding - basic
|
3,608
|
3,533
|
Dilutive
effect of stock options
|
124
|
140
|
Number
of shares used to compute earnings per share –
diluted
|
3,732
|
3,673
|
|
|
|
Basic
earnings per share from continuing operations attributable to
Trio-Tech International
|
0.02
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
Basic
earnings per share from discontinued operations attributable to
Trio-Tech International
|
-
|
-
|
Basic earnings
per share from net loss attributable to Trio-Tech
International
|
$0.02
|
$0.16
|
|
|
|
Diluted
earnings per share from continuing operations attributable to
Trio-Tech International
|
0.02
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
Diluted
earnings per share from discontinued operations attributable to
Trio-Tech International
|
-
|
-
|
Diluted
earnings per share from net loss attributable to Trio-Tech
International
|
$0.02
|
$0.16
|
|
|
|
21. STOCK OPTIONS
On September 24, 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors
unanimously adopted the 2007 Employee Stock Option Plan (the
“2007 Employee Plan”) and the 2007 Directors Equity
Incentive Plan (the “2007 Directors Plan”), each of
which was approved by the shareholders on December 3, 2007. Each of
those plans was amended during the term of such plan to increase
the number of shares covered thereby. As of the last amendment
thereof, the 2007 Employee Plan covered an aggregate of 600,000
shares of the Company’s Common Stock and the 2007 Directors
Plan covered an aggregate of 500,000 shares of the Company’s
Common Stock. Each of those plans terminated by its respective
terms on September 24, 2017. These two plans were administered by
the Board, which also established the terms of the
awards.
On September 14, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors
unanimously adopted the 2017 Employee Stock Option Plan (the
“2017 Employee Plan”) and the 2017 Directors Equity
Incentive Plan (the “2017 Directors Plan”) each of
which was approved by the shareholders on December 4, 2017. Each of
these plans is administered by the Board of Directors of the
Company.
Assumptions
The fair value for the options granted were estimated using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted
average assumptions, assuming no expected
dividends:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected
volatility
|
|
60.41%
to 104.94%
|
|
60.41%
to 104.94%
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
|
0.30%
to 0.78%
|
|
0.30%
to 0.78%
|
Expected
life (years)
|
|
2.50
|
|
2.50
|
The expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility of
the Company’s stock. Due to higher volatility, the
observation is made on a daily basis for the three months ended
September 30, 2018. The observation period covered is consistent
with the expected life of options. The expected life of the options
granted to employees has been determined utilizing the
“simplified” method as prescribed by ASC Topic
718 Stock
Based Compensation, which,
among other provisions, allows companies without access to adequate
historical data about employee exercise behavior to use a
simplified approach for estimating the expected life of a "plain
vanilla" option grant. The simplified rule for estimating the
expected life of such an option is the average of the time to
vesting and the full term of the option. The risk-free rate is
consistent with the expected life of the stock options and is based
on the United States Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of
grant.
2017 Employee Stock Option Plan
The
Company’s 2017 Employee Plan permits the grant of stock
options to its employees covering up to an aggregate of 300,000
shares of Common Stock. Under the 2017 Employee Plan, all options
must be granted with an exercise price of not less than fair value
as of the grant date and the options granted must be exercisable
within a maximum of ten years after the date of grant, or such
lesser period of time as is set forth in the stock option
agreements. The options may be exercisable (a) immediately as of
the effective date of the stock option agreement granting the
option, or (b) in accordance with a schedule related to the date of
the grant of the option, the date of first employment, or such
other date as may be set by the Compensation Committee. Generally,
options granted under the 2017 Employee Plan are exercisable within
five years after the date of grant, and vest over the period as
follows: 25% vesting on the grant date and the remaining balance
vesting in equal installments on the next three succeeding
anniversaries of the grant date. The share-based compensation will
be recognized in terms of the grade method on a straight-line basis
for each separately vesting portion of the award. Certain option
awards provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in
control (as defined in the 2017 Employee Plan).
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2018, the Company did not
grant any options pursuant to the 2017 Employee Plan. There were no
stock options exercised during the three-month period ended
September 30, 2018. The Company recognized $1 stock-based
compensation expenses during the three months ended September 30,
2018.
As of September 30, 2018, there were vested stock options granted
under the 2017 Employee Plan covering a total of 15,000 shares of
Common Stock. The weighted-average exercise price was $5.98 and the
weighted average remaining contractual term was 4.48
years.
A
summary of option activities under the 2017 Employee Plan during
the three months ended September 30, 2018 is presented as
follows:
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
at July 1, 2018
|
60,000
|
$5.98
|
4.73
|
$-
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Forfeited
or expired
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Outstanding at September 30,
2018
|
60,000
|
5.98
|
4.48
|
-
|
Exercisable at September 30,
2018
|
15,000
|
5.98
|
4.48
|
-
|
A
summary of the status of the Company’s non-vested employee
stock options during the three months ended September 30,
2018
is
presented below:
|
|
Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
Non-vested
at July 1, 2018
|
45,000
|
$5.98
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
Vested
|
-
|
-
|
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
Non-vested at September 30,
2018
|
45,000
|
$5.98
|
2007 Employee Stock Option Plan
The
Company’s 2007 Employee Plan terminated by its terms on
September 24, 2017 and no further options may be granted
thereunder. However, the options outstanding thereunder continue to
remain outstanding and in effect in accordance with their terms.
The Employee Plan permitted the grant of stock options to its
employees covering up to an aggregate of 600,000 shares of Common
Stock. Under the 2007 Employee Plan, all options were required to
be granted with an exercise price of not less than fair value as of
the grant date and the options granted were required to be
exercisable within a maximum of ten years after the date of grant,
or such lesser period of time as is set forth in the stock option
agreements. The options were permitted to be exercisable (a)
immediately as of the effective date of the stock option agreement
granting the option, or (b) in accordance with a schedule related
to the date of the grant of the option, the date of first
employment, or such other date as may be set by the Compensation
Committee. Generally, options granted under the 2007 Employee Plan
are exercisable within five years after the date of grant, and vest
over the period as follows: 25% vesting on the grant date and the
remaining balance vesting in equal installments on the next three
succeeding anniversaries of the grant date. The share-based
compensation will be recognized in terms of the grade method on a
straight-line basis for each separately vesting portion of the
award. Certain option awards provide for accelerated vesting if
there is a change in control (as defined in the 2007 Employee
Plan).
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2019, the Company did not
grant any options pursuant to the 2007 Employee Plan. There were
15,000 of options exercised during the three-month period ended
September 30, 2018. The Company recognized $1 stock-based
compensation expenses during the three months ended September 30,
2018.
The Company did not grant any options pursuant to the 2007 Employee
Plan during the three months ended September 2017. There were no
options exercised during the three months ended September 2017. The
Company recognized stock-based compensation expenses of $1 in the
three months ended September 30, 2017 under the Employee Plan. The
balance of unamortized stock-based compensation of $4 based on
weighted-average remaining contractual term for non-vested options
was 3.97 years.
As of September 30, 2018, there were vested stock options granted
under the 2007 Employee Plan covering a total of 83,750 shares of
Common Stock. The weighted-average exercise price was $3.39 and the
weighted average remaining contractual term was 1.75
years.
As of September 30, 2017, there were vested employee stock options
covering a total of 79,375 shares of Common Stock. The
weighted-average exercise price was $3.36 and the weighted average
contractual term was 2.11 years.
A summary of option activities under the 2007 Employee Plan during
the three months ended September 30, 2018 is presented as
follows:
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
Outstanding
at July 1, 2018
|
127,500
|
$3.52
|
2.10
|
$121
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Exercised
|
(15,000)
|
3.62
|
-
|
-
|
Forfeited
or expired
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Outstanding
at September 30, 2018
|
112,500
|
$3.50
|
2.10
|
$120
|
Exercisable
at September 30, 2018
|
83,750
|
$3.39
|
1.75
|
$99
|
A summary of the status of the Company’s non-vested employee
stock options during the three months ended September 30, 2018 is
presented below:
|
|
Weighted
Average Grant-Date
Fair
Value
|
Non-vested
at July 1, 2018
|
28,750
|
$3.83
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
Vested
|
-
|
-
|
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
Non-vested
at September 30, 2018
|
28,750
|
$3.83
|
A summary of option activities under the 2007 Employee Plan during
the three months ended September 30, 2017 is presented as
follows:
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
Outstanding
at July 1, 2017
|
127,500
|
$3.52
|
3.10
|
$187
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Forfeited
or expired
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Outstanding
at September 30, 2017
|
127,500
|
$3.52
|
2.85
|
$220
|
Exercisable
at September 30, 2017
|
79,375
|
$3.36
|
2.11
|
$149
|
A summary of the status of the Company’s non-vested employee
stock options during the three months ended September 30, 2017 is
presented below:
|
|
Weighted
Average Grant-Date
Fair
Value
|
Non-vested
at July 1, 2017
|
48,125
|
$3.77
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
Vested
|
-
|
-
|
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
Non-vested
at September 30, 2017
|
48,125
|
$3.77
|
2017 Directors Equity Incentive Plan
The
2017 Directors Plan permits the grant of options covering up to an
aggregate of 300,000 shares of Common Stock to its directors in the
form of non-qualified options and restricted stock. The exercise
price of the non-qualified options is 100% of the fair value of the
underlying shares on the grant date. The options have five-year
contractual terms and are generally exercisable immediately as of
the grant date.
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2019, the Company did not
grant any options pursuant to the 2017 Directors Plan. There were
no stock options exercised during the three-month period ended
September 30, 2018. The Company did not recognize any stock-based
compensation expenses during the three months ended September 30,
2018.
As all of the stock options granted under the 2017 Directors Plan
vest immediately on the date of grant, there were no unvested stock
options granted under the 2017 Directors Plan as of September 30,
2018. As of September 30, 2018, there were vested stock options
granted under the 2017 Directors Plan covering a total of 80,000
shares of Common Stock. The weighted-average exercise price was
$5.98 and the weighted average remaining contractual term was 4.48
years.
2007 Directors Equity Incentive Plan
The
2007 Directors Plan terminated by its terms on September 24, 2017
and no further options may be granted thereunder. However, the
options outstanding thereunder continue to remain outstanding and
in effect in accordance with their terms. The Directors Plan
permitted the grant of options covering up to an aggregate of
500,000 shares of Common Stock to its directors in the form of
non-qualified options and restricted stock. The exercise price of
the non-qualified options is 100% of the fair value of the
underlying shares on the grant date. The options have five-year
contractual terms and are generally exercisable immediately as of
the grant date.
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2019, the Company did not
grant any options pursuant to the 2007 Directors Plan. There were
40,000 of stock options exercised during the three-month period
ended September 30, 2018. The Company did not recognize any
stock-based compensation expenses during the three months ended
September 30, 2018.
During the first quarter of fiscal year 2018, the Company did not
grant any options pursuant to the 2007 Directors Plan. There were
no stock options exercised during the three-month period ended
September 30, 2017. The Company did not recognize any stock-based
compensation expenses during the three months ended September 30,
2017.
As of September 30, 2018, there were vested stock options granted
under the 2007 Directors Plan covering a total of 330,000 shares of
Common Stock. The weighted-average exercise price was $3.38 and the
weighted average remaining contractual term was 2.13 years. Both
the aggregate intrinsic value of such stock options outstanding and
the aggregate intrinsic value of such options exercisable as of
September 30, 2018 were $394.
As of September 30, 2017, there were vested stock options granted
under the 2007 Directors Plan covering a total of 415,000 shares of
Common Stock. The weighted-average exercise price was $3.36 and the
weighted average remaining contractual term was 2.68 years. Both
the aggregate intrinsic value of such stock options outstanding and
the aggregate intrinsic value of such options exercisable as of
September 30, 2017 were $781.
A summary of option activities under the 2007 Directors Plan during
the three months ended September 30, 2018 is presented as
follows:
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
at July 1, 2018
|
390,000
|
$3.41
|
2.05
|
$412
|
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Exercised
|
(40,000)
|
3.62
|
-
|
-
|
Forfeited
or expired
|
(20,000)
|
(3.62)
|
-
|
-
|
Outstanding
at September 30, 2018
|
330,000
|
$3.38
|
2.13
|
$394
|
Exercisable
at September 30, 2018
|
330,000
|
$3.38
|
2.13
|
$394
|
A summary of option activities under the 2007 Directors Plan during
the three months ended September 30, 2017 is presented as
follows:
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Weighted Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (Years)
|
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at July 1, 2017
|
|
|
415,000
|
|
|
$
|
3.36
|
|
|
|
2.93
|
|
|
$
|
673
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Forfeited or expired
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2017
|
|
|
415,000
|
|
|
$
|
3.36
|
|
|
|
2.68
|
|
|
$
|
781
|
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2017
|
|
|
415,000
|
|
|
$
|
3.36
|
|
|
|
2.68
|
|
|
$
|
781
|
|
22. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS APPROXIMATE
CARRYING VALUE
In accordance with ASC Topics 825 and 820, the following presents
assets and liabilities measured and carried at fair value and
classified by level of fair value measurement
hierarchy:
There were no transfers between Levels 1 and 2 during the three
months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.
Term deposits (Level 2) – The carrying amount approximates
fair value because of the short maturity of these
instruments.
Restricted term deposits (Level 2) – The carrying amount
approximates fair value because of the short maturity of these
instruments.
Lines of credit (Level 3) – The carrying value of the lines
of credit approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of
the obligations.
Bank loans payable (Level 3) – The carrying value of the
Company’s bank loan payables approximates its fair value as
the interest rates associated with long-term debt is adjustable in
accordance with market situations when the Company borrowed funds
with similar terms and remaining maturities.
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL AND SUBSIDIARIES
ITEM 2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION
AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (IN
THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
Overview
The following should be read in conjunction with the condensed
consolidated financial statements and notes in Item I above and
with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes, the
information under the headings “Risk Factors” and
“Management’s discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations” in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018.
Trio-Tech International (“TTI”) was incorporated in
1958 under the laws of the State of California. As used
herein, the term “Trio-Tech” or “Company”
or “we” or “us” or “Registrant”
includes Trio-Tech International and its subsidiaries unless the
context otherwise indicates. Our mailing address and executive
offices are located at 16139 Wyandotte Street, Van Nuys, California
91406, and our telephone number is (818) 787-7000.
The Company is a provider of reliability test equipment and
services to the semiconductor industry. Our customers rely on us to
verify that their semiconductor components meet or exceed the
rigorous reliability standards demanded for aerospace,
communications and other electronics products.
TTI generated approximately 99.7% of its revenue from its three
core business segments in the test and measurement industry, i.e.
manufacturing of test equipment, testing services and distribution
of test equipment during the three months ended September 30, 2018.
The Real Estate segment contributed only 0.3% to the total revenue
and has been insignificant since the property market in China has
slowed down due to control measures in China.
Manufacturing
TTI develops and manufactures an extensive range of test equipment
used in the "front end" and the "back end" manufacturing processes
of semiconductors. Our equipment includes leak detectors,
autoclaves, centrifuges, burn-in systems and boards, HAST testers,
temperature controlled chucks, wet benches and more.
Testing
TTI provides comprehensive electrical, environmental, and burn-in
testing services to semiconductor manufacturers in our testing
laboratories in Asia and the U.S. Our customers include both
manufacturers and end-users of semiconductor and electronic
components, who look to us when they do not want to establish their
own facilities. The independent tests are performed to industry and
customer specific standards.
Distribution
In addition to marketing our proprietary products, we distribute
complementary products made by manufacturers mainly from the U.S.,
Europe, Taiwan and Japan. The products include environmental
chambers, handlers, interface systems, vibration systems, shaker
systems, solderability testers and other semiconductor equipment.
Besides equipment, we also distribute a wide range of components
such as connectors, sockets, LCD display panels and touch-screen
panels. Furthermore, our range of products are mainly targeted for
industrial products rather than consumer products whereby the life
cycle of the industrial products can last from 3 years to 7
years.
Real Estate
Beginning in 2007, TTI has invested in real estate property in
Chongqing, China, which has generated investment income from the
rental revenue from real estate we purchased in Chongqing, China,
and investment returns from deemed loan receivables, which are
classified as other income. The rental income is generated from the
rental properties in MaoYe and FuLi in Chongqing, China. In the
second quarter of fiscal 2015, the investment in JiaSheng, which
was deemed as loans receivable, was transferred to down payment for
purchase of investment property in China.
First Quarter Fiscal Year 2019 Highlights
●
Total
revenue decreased by $900, or 8.2 %, to $10,045 in the first
quarter of fiscal year 2019, compared to $10,945 for the same
period in fiscal year 2018.
●
Manufacturing
segment revenue decreased by $1,128, or 23.7%, to $3,637 for the
first quarter of fiscal year 2019, compared to $4,765 for the same
period in fiscal year 2018.
●
Testing
segment revenue decreased by $168, or 3.6%, to $4,437 for the first
quarter of fiscal year 2019, compared to $4,605 for the same period
in fiscal year 2018.
●
Distribution
segment revenue increased by $408, or 26.6%, to $1,944 for the
first quarter of fiscal year 2019, compared to $1,536 for the same
period in fiscal year 2018.
●
Real
estate segment rental revenue was $27 for the first quarter of
fiscal year 2019 and $39 for the first quarter of fiscal year
2018.
●
The
overall gross profit margin decreased by 4.3% to 20.9% for the
first quarter of fiscal year 2019, from 25.2% for the same period
in fiscal year 2018.
●
Income
from operations was $123 for the first quarter of fiscal year 2019,
a decrease of $424, as compared to an income from operations of
$547 for the same period in fiscal year 2018.
●
General
and administrative expenses decreased by $80, or 4.4%, to $1,759
for the first quarter of fiscal year 2019, from $1,839 for the same
period in fiscal year 2018.
●
Selling
expenses decreased by $32, or 17.9%, to $147 for the first quarter
of fiscal year 2019, from $179 for the same period in fiscal year
2018.
●
Other
income decreased by $115 to $43 in the first quarter of fiscal year
2019 compared to $158 in the same period in fiscal year
2018.
●
Tax
expense increased by $32 to $74 in the first quarter of fiscal year
2019 compared to $42 in the same period in fiscal year
2018.
●
During
the first quarter of fiscal year 2019, income from continuing
operations before non-controlling interest, net of tax was $14, as
compared to an income of $605 for the same period in fiscal year
2018.
●
Net
loss attributable to non-controlling interest for the first quarter
of fiscal year 2019 was $59, a deterioration of $86, as compared to
net income of $27 in the same period in fiscal year
2018.
●
Working
capital increased by $1,472, or 16.0%, to $10,700 as of September
30, 2018 compared to $9,228 as of June 30, 2018.
●
Basic
Earnings per share for the first quarter of fiscal year 2019 were
$0.02, as compared to earnings per share of $0.16 for the same
period in fiscal year 2018.
●
Dilutive
Earnings per share for the first quarter of fiscal year 2019 were
$0.02, as compared to earnings per share of $0.16 for the same
period in fiscal year 2018.
●
Total
assets increased by $565, or 1.5% to $37,039 as of September 30,
2018 compared to $36,474 as of June 30, 2018.
●
Total
liabilities increased by $899, or 6.9% to $13,872 as of September
30, 2018 compared to $12,973 as of June 30, 2018.
Results of Operations and Business Outlook
The following table sets forth our revenue components for the three
months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017,
respectively.
Revenue
Components
|
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
Manufacturing
|
36.2%
|
43.5%
|
Testing
Services
|
44.2
|
42.1
|
Distribution
|
19.3
|
14.0
|
Real
Estate
|
0.3
|
0.4
|
Total
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
Revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2018 was $10,045,
a decrease of $900 from $10,945 when compared to the revenue for
the same period of the prior fiscal year. As a percentage, revenue
decreased by 8.2% for the three months ended September 30, 2018
when compared to revenue for the same period of the prior
year.
For the three months ended September 30, 2018, there was a decrease
in revenue across all segments except for the distribution
segment when
compared to the same period of the prior fiscal
year.
Total revenue into and within China, the Southeast Asia regions and
other countries (except revenue into and within the United States)
decreased by $842, or 8.1%, to $9,576 for the three months ended
September 30, 2018, as compared with $10,418 for the same period of
last fiscal year. The decrease was mainly due to a decrease in the manufacturing
segment in the Singapore and Suzhou, China operations and a
decrease in the testing segment in the Tianjin, China operations
which was partially offset by an increase in the testing segment
and distribution segment in our Singapore
operations.
Total revenue into and within the U.S. was $469 for the three
months ended September 30, 2018, a decrease of $58 from $527 for
the same period of the prior year. The decrease in the three months
result was mainly due to a decrease in orders from existing
customers in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019 as compared to
the same period in fiscal year 2018.
Revenue within our four current segments for the three months ended
September 30, 2018 is discussed below.
Manufacturing Segment
Revenue in the manufacturing segment as a percentage of total
revenue was 36.2% for the three months ended September 30, 2018, a
decrease of 7.3% of total revenue when compared to 43.5% in the
same period of the last fiscal year. The absolute amount of
revenue decreased by $1,128 to $3,637 for the three months ended
September 30, 2018, compared to $4,765, for the same period of the
last fiscal year.
Revenue in the manufacturing segment for the three months ended
September 30, 2018 decreased primarily due to a decrease in orders
by customers in the Singapore and Suzhou, China
operations.
The revenue in the manufacturing segment from a major customer
accounted for 39.6% and 37.9% of our revenue in the manufacturing
segment for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017,
respectively. The future revenue in our manufacturing segment will
be affected by the purchase and capital expenditure plans of this
major customer, if the customer base cannot be
increased.
Testing Services Segment
Revenue in the testing segment as a percentage of total revenue was
44.2% for the three months ended September 30, 2018, a increase of
2.1% of total revenue when compared to 42.1% for the same period of
the last fiscal year. The absolute amount of revenue decreased
by $168 to $4,437 for the three months ended September 30,
2018, as compared to $4,605 for the same period of the last fiscal
year.
Revenue in the testing segment for the three months ended September
30, 2018 decreased primarily due to a decrease in our Tianjin,
China operations but was partially offset by an increase in our
Singapore operations. The decrease in Tianjin, China was caused by
a decrease in orders from our major customer.
The revenue in the testing segment from a major customer accounted
for 76.0% and 78.4% of our revenue in the testing segment for the
three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The
future revenue in our testing segment will be affected by the
demands of this major customer, if the customer base cannot be
increased. Demand for testing services varies from country to
country depending on changes taking place in the market and our
customers’ forecasts. As it is difficult to accurately
forecast fluctuations in the market, management believes it is
necessary to maintain testing facilities in close proximity to our
customers in order to make it convenient for them to send us their
newly manufactured parts for testing and to enable us to maintain a
share of the market.
Distribution Segment
Revenue in the distribution segment as a percentage of total
revenue was 19.3% for the three months ended September 30, 2018, an
increase of 5.3% of total revenue when compared to 14.0% in the
same period of the last fiscal year. The absolute amount of
revenue increased by $408 to $1,944 for the three months ended
September 30, 2018, compared to $1,536 for the same period of the
last fiscal year.
Revenue in the distribution segment for the three months ended
September 30, 2018 increased primarily due to an increase in
revenue generated from customers in the Singapore
operations.
Demand for the distribution segment varies depending on the demand
for our customers’ products, the changes taking place in the
market and our customers’ forecasts. Hence it is
difficult to accurately forecast fluctuations in the
market.
Real Estate Segment
The real estate segment accounted for 0.3% of total revenue for the
three months ended September 30, 2018 and 0.4% of total revenue for
three months ended September 30, 2017. The absolute amount of
revenue in the real estate segment was $27 for the three months
ended September 30, 2018 and $39 for the three months ended 30
September 2017.
During the first quarter of 2019, Management decided to sell our
Mao Ye Property, which is one of our earlier investment properties.
In order to monetize the capital gain on property, TTCQ appointed a
sole agent for 6 months as of September 1, 2018 to search for
suitable buyers for this property. In accordance with ASC Topic
360, as there was an intention to sell the investment properties,
the property was reclassified from investment property, which had a
net book value of RMB 2,729, or approximately $397 as at September
30, 2018, to assets held for sale.
Uncertainties and Remedies
There are several influencing factors which create uncertainties
when forecasting performance, such as the constantly changing
nature of technology, specific requirements from the customer,
decline in demand for certain types of burn-in devices or
equipment, decline in demand for testing services and fabrication
services, and other similar factors. One factor that influences
uncertainty is the highly competitive nature of the semiconductor
industry. Another is that some customers are unable to provide a
forecast of the products required in the upcoming weeks; hence it
is difficult to plan for the resources needed to meet these
customers’ requirements due to short lead time and last
minute order confirmation. This will normally result in a lower
margin for these products, as it is more expensive to purchase
materials in a short time frame. However, the Company has taken
certain actions and formulated certain plans to deal with and to
help mitigate these unpredictable factors. For example, in order to
meet manufacturing customers’ demands upon short notice, the
Company maintains higher inventories, but continues to work closely
with its customers to avoid stock piling. We believe that we have
improved customer service from staff through our efforts to keep
our staff up to date on the newest technology and stressing the
importance of understanding and meeting the stringent requirements
of our customers. Finally, the Company is exploring new markets and
products, looking for new customers, and upgrading and improving
burn-in technology while at the same time searching for improved
testing methods of higher technology chips.
We are in the process of implementing an Enterprise Resource
Planning (“ERP”) system, as part of a multi-year plan
to integrate and upgrade our systems and processes. The
implementation of this ERP system is scheduled to occur in phases
over the next few years, and began with the migration of certain of
our operational and financial systems in our Singapore operations
to the new ERP system during the second quarter of fiscal 2018.
This implementation effort will continue in fiscal 2019, when the
operational and financial systems in Singapore will be
substantially transitioned to the new system. Implementation of a
new ERP system involves risks and uncertainties. Any disruptions,
delays or deficiencies in the design or implementation of the new
system could result in increased costs and adversely affect our
ability to timely report our financial results, which could
negatively impact our business and results of
operations.
The Company’s primary exposure to movements in foreign
currency exchange rates relates to non-U.S. dollar-denominated
sales and operating expenses in its subsidiaries. Strengthening of
the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies adversely affects
the U.S. dollar value of the Company’s foreign
currency-denominated sales and earnings, and generally leads the
Company to raise international pricing, potentially reducing demand
for the Company’s products. Margins on sales of the
Company’s products in foreign countries and on sales of
products that include components obtained from foreign suppliers
could be materially adversely affected by foreign currency exchange
rate fluctuations. In some circumstances, for competitive or other
reasons, the Company may decide not to raise local prices to fully
offset the dollar’s strengthening, or at all, which would
adversely affect the U.S. dollar value of the Company’s
foreign currency-denominated sales and earnings. Conversely, a
strengthening of foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar,
while generally beneficial to the Company’s foreign currency
denominated sales and earnings could cause the Company to reduce
international pricing, thereby limiting the benefit. Additionally,
strengthening of foreign currencies may also increase the
Company’s cost of product components denominated in those
currencies, thus adversely affecting gross margins.
There are several influencing factors which create uncertainties
when forecasting performance of our real estate segment, such as
obtaining the rights by the joint venture to develop the real
estate projects in China, inflation in China, currency fluctuations
and devaluation, and changes in Chinese laws, regulations, or their
interpretation.
Comparison of the First Quarter Ended September 30, 2018 and
September 30, 2017
The following table sets forth certain consolidated statements of
income data as a percentage of revenue for the first quarter of
fiscal years 2019 and 2018, respectively:
|
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
Cost
of sales
|
79.1
|
74.8
|
Gross Margin
|
20.9%
|
25.2%
|
Operating
expenses
|
|
|
General
and administrative
|
17.5%
|
16.8%
|
Selling
|
1.5
|
1.6
|
Research
and development
|
0.7
|
1.7
|
Loss
on disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
0.0
|
0.1
|
Total
operating expenses
|
19.7%
|
20.2%
|
Income from Operations
|
1.2%
|
5.0%
|
Overall Gross Margin
Overall gross margin as a percentage of revenue decreased by 4.3%
to 20.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2018, from 25.2%
for the same period of the last fiscal year, primarily due to a
decrease in the gross profit margin in the testing segment. The
decrease was partially offset by an increase in gross profit margin
in the distribution segment.
Gross profit margin as a percentage of revenue in the manufacturing
segment decreased by 2.0% to 21.4% for the three months ended
September 30, 2018, as compared to 23.4% for the same period in
last fiscal year. The decrease in gross profit margin was primarily
due to more sales of low profit margin products being higher than
the sale of high profit margin products in the three months ended
September 30, 2018. In absolute dollar amounts, gross profits in
the manufacturing segment decreased by $336 to $780 for the three
months ended September 30, 2018, from $1,116 for the same period in
the last fiscal year.
Gross profit margin as a percentage of revenue in the testing
segment decreased by 8.0% to 23.8% for the three months ended
September 30, 2018, from 31.8% in the same period of the last
fiscal year. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in
testing volume in our Tianjin, China operations. Significant
portions of our cost of goods sold are fixed in the testing
segment. Thus, as the demand of services and factory
utilization decreases, the fixed costs are spread over the
decreased output, which decreases the gross profit margin. In
absolute dollar amounts, gross profit in the testing segment
decreased by $412 to $1,054 for the three months ended September
30, 2018 from $1,466 for the same period of the last fiscal
year.
Gross profit margin of the distribution segment is not only
affected by the market price of the products we distribute, but
also the mix of products we distribute, which changes frequently as
a result of changes in market demand. Gross profit margin as a
percentage of revenue in the distribution segment increased by 2.4%
to 13.3% for the three months ended September 30, 2018, from 10.9%
in the same period of the last fiscal year. The increase in
gross margin was due to the increase in sales of high profit margin
products in our Singapore operation as compared to the same period
of last fiscal year. In terms of absolute dollar amounts, gross
profit in the distribution segment for the three months ended
September 30, 2018 was $258 as compared to $168 in the same period
of the last fiscal year.
Gross profit margin as a percentage of revenue in the real estate
segment was 33.3% for the three months ended September 30, 2018, as
compared to 25.6% in the same period of the last fiscal year. In
absolute dollar amounts, for the three months ended September 30,
2018, gross profit margin in the real estate segment was $9. For
the three months ended September 30, 2017, gross profit margin of
$10 was generated.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses for the first quarter of fiscal years 2018 and
2017 were as follows:
|
Three Months
Ended
September
30,
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
General
and administrative
|
$1,759
|
$1,839
|
Selling
|
147
|
179
|
Research
and development
|
72
|
184
|
Loss
on disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
-
|
11
|
Total
|
$1,978
|
$2,213
|
General and administrative expenses decreased by $80, or 4.4%, from
$1,839 to $1,759 for the three months ended September 30, 2018
compared to the same period of last fiscal year. The decrease in
general and administrative expenses was mainly attributable to the
decrease in staff welfare related expenses in the U.S.
operations.
Selling expenses decreased by $32, or 17.9%, from $179 to $147 for
the three months ended September 30, 2018, compared to the same
period of the last fiscal year. The decrease was mainly due to a
decrease in commission expenses in the manufacturing segment of our
Singapore operations because of a decrease in commissionable
revenue and a decrease in warranty expenses due to adoption of a
new revenue standard as described in note 19 to the financial
statements included in item 1 of this Form 10-Q.
Research and development expenses decreased by $112, or 60.9%, from
$184 to $72 for the three months ended September 30, 2018, compared
to the same period of the last fiscal year. The decrease was mainly
due to a decrease of the expenses in Suzhou, China operation. The
operation did not incur research and development expenses in three
months ended September 30, 2018 whereas there was a one-off
research and development project in the Suzhou, China operations in
the three months ended September 30, 2017.
Income from Operations
Income from operations was $123 for the three months ended
September 30, 2018, a decrease of $424, as compared to an income
from operations of $547 for the three months ended September 30,
2017. The decrease was mainly due to the decrease in revenue and
the decrease in gross profit which was partially offset by the
decrease in operating expenses, as previously
discussed.
Interest Expense
Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and
2017 were as follows:
|
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Interest expenses
|
$78
|
$58
|
Interest expense was $78 for the three months ended September 30,
2018 and $58 for the three months ended September 30, 2017. The
increase is was due to increase utilization of short-term loan in
the Singapore operation. As of September 30, 2018, the Company
had an unused line of credit of $3,858 as compared to $4,639 at
September 30, 2017.
Other Income
Other income for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017
were as follows:
|
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
10
|
8
|
Other
rental income
|
27
|
26
|
Exchange
loss
|
(39)
|
(6)
|
Bad
debt recovery
|
2
|
1
|
Other
miscellaneous income
|
43
|
129
|
Total
|
$43
|
$158
|
Other income decreased by $115 to $43 for the three months ended
September 30, 2018 from $158 as compared to the same period in the
last fiscal year. The decrease was primarily due to the existence
of a non-recurring reimbursement income for the three months ended
September 30, 2017. Furthermore, this decrease was also caused by
an increase of exchange loss. The exchange loss increases by $33
from $6 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 to an
exchange loss of $39 for the three months ended September 30, 2018
was mainly due to transactional foreign exchange differences in the
Malaysia and Tianjin, China operations.
Income Tax Expenses
The Company had an income tax expense of $74 for the three months
ended September 30, 2018 as compared to an income tax expense of
$42 for the same period in the last fiscal year. The increase in
income tax expenses was mainly due to a change from deferred tax
benefit in the same period last fiscal year to deferred tax expense
for timing differences recorded by the Malaysia
operation.
The Tax
Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) was enacted on
December 22, 2017, the Tax Act requires a mandatory one-time
repatriation of certain post-1986 earnings and profits that were
deferred from US taxation by the Company’s foreign
subsidiaries. The Company recognized an income tax expense
and payable of $900 in fiscal year 2018. The computation of the
post-1986 earning and profits used estimates and are preliminary
amounts which will be finalized during the measurement period. No
adjustment of provision being made in this period. The company
elected to pay the Repatriation Tax over an 8-year period at no
interest rate and is not expected to have a material effect on the
Company’s working capital position.
The Tax
Act implemented the inclusion in gross income for the Global
Intangible Low-Tax Income (GILTI) for any taxable year beginning on
or after January 1, 2018. This provision significantly expands
current taxation of foreign subsidiary corporate earnings. Given
the complexity of GILTI provision, the company is still assessing
the effects of the provisions to determine whether to elect to
either provide for the minimum tax as future income tax expense as
a period expense or as a deferred tax on the related investment in
foreign subsidiaries.
Non-controlling Interest
As of September 30, 2018, we held a 55% interest in Trio-Tech
(Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd., Trio-Tech (Kuala Lumpur) Sdn. Bhd., SHI
International Pte. Ltd., and PT. SHI Indonesia. We also held a 76%
interest in Prestal Enterprise Sdn. Bhd. The share of net loss from
the subsidiaries by the non-controlling interest for the three
months ended September 30, 2017 was $59, a decrease of $86 compared
to the share of net income of $27 for the same period of the
previous fiscal year. The decrease in the net income of the
non-controlling interest in the subsidiaries was attributable to
the decrease in net income generated by the Malaysia operations as
compared to the same period in the previous fiscal
year.
Net Income
Net income for the three months ended September 30, 2018 was $65, a
decrease of $510, as compared to a net income of $575 for the same
period last fiscal year.
Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations were $0.02 for
the three months ended September 30, 2018 as compared to $0.16 for
the same period in the last fiscal year. Basic earnings per share
from discontinued operations were nil for both the three months
ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations were $0.02
for the three months ended September 30, 2018 as compared to $0.16
for the same period in the last fiscal year. Diluted earnings per
share from discontinued operations were nil for both the three
months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.
Segment Information
The revenue, gross margin and income or loss from operations for
each segment during the first quarter of fiscal year 2019 and
fiscal year 2018 are presented below. As the revenue and gross
margin for each segment have been discussed in the previous
section, only the comparison of income or loss from operations is
discussed below.
Manufacturing Segment
The revenue, gross margin and income from operations for the
manufacturing segment for the three months ended September 30, 2018
and 2017 were as follows:
|
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$3,637
|
$4,765
|
Gross margin
|
21.4%
|
23.4%
|
Income from operations
|
$107
|
$186
|
Income from operations from the manufacturing segment was $107
as compared to $185 in the same period of the last fiscal year,
primarily due to a decrease in gross margin, and partially offset
by a decrease in operating expenses. Gross profit decreased by $336
while operating expenses decreased by $258. Operating expenses for
the manufacturing segment were $673 and $930 for the three months
ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The $258 decrease
in operating expenses was mainly due to a decrease in general and
administrative expenses by $67, selling expenses decreased by $50
and research and development expenses decreased by $133. The
decrease in general and administrative expenses was mainly
attributable to the revision in method of allocation of payroll
related expenses between segments in the Singapore operations. The
decrease in selling expenses was due to lower commission expenses
as there was less commissionable revenue in the Singapore
operations. The decrease of research and development expenses was
due to the existence of a one-off project in the Suzhou, China
operations in three months ended September 30, 2017.
Testing Segment
The revenue, gross margin and (loss) / income from operations for
the testing segment for the three months ended September 30, 2018
and 2017 were as follows:
|
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$4,437
|
$4,605
|
Gross margin
|
23.8%
|
31.8%
|
(Loss)/ Income from operations
|
$(138)
|
$336
|
Loss from operations in the testing segment for the three months
ended September 30, 2018 was $138, a change of $474 compared to
income from operations of $336 in the same period of the last
fiscal year. The change in operating income was mainly
attributable to a decrease of gross profit margin as discussed
earlier and also an increase in operating expenses. Operating
expenses were $1,192 and $1,130 for the three months ended
September 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The
$62 increase in operating expenses was mainly due to an increase in
general and administrative expenses by $130, which was partially
offset by a decrease in corporate overhead by $91. The increase in
general and administrative expenses was mainly due to a revision in
method of allocation of payroll related expenses between segments
in the Singapore operations.
Distribution Segment
The revenue, gross margin and income from operations for the
distribution segment for the three months ended September 30, 2018
and 2017 were as follows:
|
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$1,944
|
$1,536
|
Gross margin
|
13.3%
|
10.9%
|
Income from operations
|
$172
|
$101
|
Income from operations was $172, for the three months ended
September 30, 2018, as compared to $101 for the same period of last
fiscal year. The increase of $71 was mainly due to an increase
in gross margin, as discussed earlier, and partially offset by an
increase in operating expenses. Gross profit increased by $90 while
operating expenses increased by $19. Operating expenses were $86
and $67 for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017,
respectively. The increase in operating expenses was mainly due to
an increase in general and administrative expenses of
$11.
Real Estate Segment
The revenue, gross margin and loss from operations for the real
estate segment for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and
2017 were as follows:
|
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$27
|
$39
|
Gross margin
|
33.3%
|
25.6%
|
Loss from operations
|
$(12)
|
$(10)
|
Loss from operations in the real estate segment for the three
months ended September 30, 2018 was $12 compared to $10 for the
same period of last fiscal year. Operating expenses were $21
and $20 for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017,
respectively.
Corporate
The loss from operations for Corporate for the three months ended
September 30, 2018 and 2017 was as
follows:
|
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(66
|
)
|
Corporate operating loss was $6 for the three months ended
September 30, 2018, a decrease of $60 from a loss of $66 in the
same period of the last fiscal year. The decrease was mainly
attributable to a decrease in general and administrative
expenses.
Financial Condition
During the three months ended September 30, 2018 total assets
increased by $565 from $36,474 as at June 30, 2018 to $37,039. The
increase in total assets was primarily due to an increase in cash
& cash equivalents, short term deposits, trade accounts
receivable, prepaid expenses, property, plant and equipment and
deferred tax assets, which were partially offset by a decrease in
notes & other receivables, inventory and restricted term
deposits.
Cash and cash equivalents were $7,101 as at September 30, 2018,
reflecting an increase of $562 from $6,539 as at June 30,
2018, primarily due to loan drawdown in the Malaysia operation and
a deposit from a customer, which were partially offset by the
decrease due to placement of a fixed deposit and repayment of a
loan by the Singapore operation and purchase of property, plant and
equipment by the China operation.
Short term deposits were $1,011 as at September 30, 2018,
reflecting an increase of $358 from $653 as at June 30, 2018,
primarily due to placement of a deposit by the Singapore
operation.
As at September 30, 2018, the trade accounts receivable balance
increased by $374 to $8,121, from $7,747 as at June 30, 2018,
primarily due to the increase in revenue for the first three months
of fiscal year 2019 as compared to the revenue in the fourth
quarter of last fiscal year in the Singapore operation and longer
collection cycles in the Singapore operation. The increase was
partially offset by the decrease in the Malaysia and Tianjin, China
operations due to the decrease in revenue for the first three
months of fiscal year 2019 as compared to the revenue in the fourth
quarter of last fiscal year. The number of days’ sales
outstanding in accounts receivables for the Group was 74 and 72
days at the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2019 and for
the fiscal year ended 2018, respectively.
As at September 30, 2018 other receivables were $889, reflecting an
increase of 8 from $881 as at June 30, 2018. The increase was
primarily due to the tax incentive received by the Tianjin, China
Operation in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019.
Inventories as at September 30, 2018 were $2,386, a decrease of
$544, as compared to $2,930 as at June 30, 2018. The decrease in
inventory was mainly due to higher inventory turnover days in the
Singapore operations.
Prepaid expenses were $330 as at September 30, 2018 compared to
$208 as at June 30, 2018. The increase of $122 was primarily due to
prepayment for software related expenses in the Singapore operation
and insurance in the Singapore and Tianjin, China
operations.
Investment properties, net in China were $693 as at September 30,
2018 and $1,146 as at June 30, 2018. The decrease was due to
reclassification of the Maoye properties amounting to RMB 2,729, or
approximately $397 to Asset held for sale due to management’s
decision to sell the investment property.
Assets held for sales were $486 as at September 30, 2018 and $91 as
at June 30, 2018. The increase was due to reclassification of
the Maoye properties amounting to RMB 2,729, or approximately $397
from investment properties due to management’s decision to
sell the investment property.
Property, plant and equipment, net increased by $332 from $11,935
as at June 30, 2018, to $12,267 as at September 30, 2018, mainly
due to higher capital expenditure in the Malaysia and Tianjin,
China operations for the three months ended September 30,
2018.
Restricted cash decreased by $10 to $1,685 as at September 30,
2018, as compared to $1,695 as at June 30, 2018. This was
primarily due to the foreign currency exchange difference between
functional currency and U.S. dollars from June 30, 2018 to
September 30, 2018.
Other assets decreased by $585 to $1,664 as at September 30, 2018,
as compared to $2,249 as at June 30, 2018. This was
mainly due to reclassification of down payment made for purchase of
property, plant equipment to fixed assets by the Malaysia and
Tianjin, China operations.
Utilized lines of credit increased by $90 to $2,133 as at September
30, 2018 compared to $2,043 as at June 30, 2018, which was mainly
due to utilization of the credit facility by Tianjin, China
operation in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019 which was
partially offset by the lower utilization of lines of credit by the
Singapore operation.
Accounts payable decreased by $765 to $2,939 as at September 30,
2018, as compared to $3,704 as at June 30, 2018. This was due to
the increase in creditor turnover days in the Singapore
operation.
Accrued expenses increased by $399 to $3,571 as at September 30,
2018, as compared to $3,172 as at June 30, 2018. The increase in
accrued expenses was mainly due to an increase in a customer
deposit in the Suzhou, China Operation.
Bank loans payable increased by $1,321 to $3,125 as at September
30, 2018, as compared to $1,804 as at June 30, 2018. This was due
to an additional loan availed by the Malaysia
operation.
Capital leases decreased by $76 to $698 as at September 30, 2018,
as compared to $774 as at June 30, 2018. This was due to the
repayment of capital leases by the Singapore and Malaysia
operations.
Liquidity Comparison
Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $628 to an
inflow of $558 for the three months ended September 30, 2018 from
an outflow of $70 for the same period of the last fiscal year. The
increase in net cash inflow provided by operating activities was
primarily due to an increase in cash inflow of $1,234 from
inventories, an increase of $779 from other assets and a decrease
in cash outflow of $791 from accounts receivables. These were
partially offset by decrease in net income by $596, an increase in
cash outflow of $1,408 from accounts payable and accrued expenses
and an increase in cash outflow by $124 from income tax
payable.
Net cash used in investing activities increased by $755 to an
outflow of $1,211 for the three months ended September 30, 2018
from an outflow of $456 for the same period of the last fiscal
year. The increase in cash outflow was primarily due to an increase
in capital expenditure by $685 and by a decrease of $73 in proceeds
from insurance claim.
Net cash generated in financing activities for the three months
ended September 30, 2018 was $1,639, representing an increase of
$2,564, as compared to net cash used in financing activities of
$925 during the three months ended September 30, 2017. The increase
was mainly attributable to an increase by $3,154 in cash inflow
from borrowings through lines of credit and bank loans and an
increase by $199 in proceeds from exercising of stock option which
was partially offset by an increase in cash outflow of $793 from
repayment of lines of credit.
We believe that our projected cash flows from operations, borrowing
availability under our revolving lines of credit, cash on hand,
trade credit and the secured bank loan will provide the necessary
financial resources to meet our projected cash requirements for at
least the next 12 months.
Critical Accounting Estimates & Policies
Effective
as of July 1, 2018, the Company has adopted ASU 2014-09, Revenue from contracts with
Customers (Topic 606),, and its related amendments using
modified retrospective transition method. We have completed our
adoption and implemented policies, processes and controls to
support the standard’s measurement and disclosure
requirements as described in note 1 to
the financial statements included in item 1 of this Form
10-Q.
The amendments in ASU 2016-02 ASC Topic 842: Leases become effective for the Company
in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including
interim periods within those fiscal years. These amendments require
companies to recognize the following for all leases (with the
exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date of the
applicable lease: (a) a lease liability, which is a lessee’s
obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on
a discounted basis; and (b) a right-of-use asset, which is as an
asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control
the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of this accounting standard update
on its consolidated financial statements.
There
have been no other significant changes in the critical accounting
policies from those, disclosed in” Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations” included in the most recent Annual Report on Form
10-K.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT
MARKET RISK
Not applicable.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
An evaluation was carried out by the Company’s Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the effectiveness
of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of September 30, 2018, the end
of the period covered by this Form 10-Q. Based upon that
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were
effective at a reasonable level.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Except as discussed below, there has been no change in the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting
during the fiscal quarter
ended September 30, 2018, that have materially affected, or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting.
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Implementation
We are in the process of implementing an ERP System, as part of a
multi-year plan to integrate and upgrade our systems and processes.
The implementation of this ERP system is scheduled to occur in
phases over the next few years, and began with the migration of
certain operational and financial systems in our Singapore
operations to the new ERP system during the second quarter of
fiscal 2017. During the third quarter of fiscal 2018, the
operational and financial systems in Singapore were substantially
transitioned to the new system.
This implementation effort continued in fiscal 2019. The
operational and financial systems in our Malaysia operation have
been substantially transitioned to the new system during the first
quarter of fiscal 2019.
As a phased implementation of this system occurs, we are
experiencing certain changes to our processes and procedures which,
in turn, result in changes to our internal control over financial
reporting. While we expect the new ERP system to strengthen our
internal financial controls by automating certain manual processes
and standardizing business processes and reporting across our
organization, management will continue to evaluate and
monitor our internal controls as processes and procedures in each
of the affected areas evolve.
Adoption of New Revenue
Recognition Accounting Standard
We implemented controls relating to adoption of the new revenue
recognition accounting standards that were adopted in fiscal 2019
to ensure that the revenue contracts, and related policies and
process flows were sufficiently reviewed to identify adoption
impacts.
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL
PART II. OTHER
INFORMATION
Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
Not applicable.
Item 1A. Risk
Factors
Not applicable
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of
Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Malaysia and Singapore regulations prohibit the payment of
dividends if the Company does not have sufficient retained earnings
and tax credit. In addition, the payment of dividends can only be
made after making deductions for income tax pursuant to the
regulations. Furthermore, the cash movements from the
Company’s 55% owned Malaysian subsidiary to overseas are
restricted and must be authorized by the Central Bank of Malaysia.
California law also prohibits the payment of dividends if the
Company does not have sufficient retained earnings or cannot meet
certain asset to liability ratios.
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Mine
Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other
Information
Not applicable.
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer of
Registrant
|
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer of
Registrant
|
|
|
Section 1350 Certification
|
|
|
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
|
TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL
|
|
By:
|
/s/
Victor H.M. Ting
VICTOR H.M. TING
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Dated: November 13, 2018
|