The information furnished herewith reflects all adjustments, which are in the opinion of management necessary to a fair statement of the results for the period. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principals generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to SEC rules and regulations, although the Company believes the disclosures which are made are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.

The condensed consolidated financial statements contained herein should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's latest annual report on Form 10-K. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have not been audited by a firm of certified public accountants.

It is the Company's policy to reclassify amounts in the prior year financial statements to conform to the current year presentation.

Note B - New Accounting Standards

In September 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 157, "Fair Value Measurements". SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, but does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those years. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of the guidance contained in SFAS 157 and does not expect the implementation to have a material effect on the Company's financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159. SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not otherwise required to be measured at fair value under GAAP. A company that elects the fair value option for an eligible item will be required to recognize in current earnings any changes in that item's fair value in reporting periods subsequent to the date of adoption. SFAS 159 is effective as of the Company's first quarter of fiscal 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of SFAS 159 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard ("SFAS") No. 141(R), "Business Combinations". SFAS 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer, recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase, and determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS 141(R) is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. As such, the Company is required to adopt these provisions at the beginning of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 141(R) on its consolidated financial statements but does not expect it to have a material effect.

In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard ("SFAS") No. 160, "Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51". SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. As such, the Company is required to adopt these provisions at the beginning of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 160 on its consolidated financial statements but does not expect it to have a material effect.

Note C - Pension and Other Post-retirement Benefit Plans

The Company uses June 30 as the measurement date for its plans.

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost:

The Company's pension plan weighted-average asset allocations at December 31, 2007 and 2006 by asset category are as follows:

There is no Company common stock included in the plan assets.

Amounts recognized in the Statement of Financial Position consist of:

Information for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets:

The plan objective is to provide real (inflation adjusted) growth in assets vs. benchmark over a complete market cycle. The plan's objective assumes asset growth will meet or exceed 8% of (risk adjusted) growth over a complete market cycle.

Investment guidelines are based upon an investment horizon of greater than five years. There is a requirement to maintain sufficient liquid reserves to provide for payment of retirement benefits.

The asset allocation guidelines for the plan are as follows:

These asset allocation guidelines reflect the plan's desire for investment return. They also reflect the full discretion of the Investment Manager to shift the asset mix within the specified ranges.

The desired investment objective is a long-term rate of return on assets that is approximately 8%. The target rate of return for the plan has been based upon the assumption that future real returns will approximate the long-term rates of return experienced for each asset class of the Investment Policy Statement over a complete business cycle. The plan's overall annualized total return after deducting advisory, money management and custodial fees, as well as total transaction costs should perform above an index comprised of market indices weighted by the strategic asset allocation of the plan.

In order to accomplish the investment goals, the Investment Committee believes that the investments of the plan must be diversified to provide the Investment Manager with the flexibility to invest in various types of assets. The Investment Committee recognizes that a moderate amount of risk must be assumed to achieve the Plan's long-term objectives. The Investment Committee believes that the Company's prospects for the future, current financial conditions and several other factors suggest collectively that the plan can tolerate some interim fluctuations in market value and rates of return in order to achieve long-term objectives.

The Company expects to contribute $475,000 to its Pension Plan and $57,254 to its Post Retirement Benefit Plan in 2008.

The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid:

Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for health care plans. A one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following

Note D - Segment Overview

The following table reflects the results of the segments consistent with the Company's internal financial reporting process. The following results are used in part, by management, both in evaluating the performance of, and in allocating resources to, each of these segments.

(1) Before elimination of intercompany interest.

(2) The Appliance Co. discontinued operations in September 2003.

(3) Corning Realty and Corning Mortgage discontinued operations in August 2006.

Note E - Other Events

On June 28, 2007 the Company filed a rate case with the New York Public Service Commission (the "NYPSC") requesting an increase of $581,038 for rates to become effective June 2008. In November 2007, we amended our June 28, 2007 filing to make the rate case a mini filing so that under the NYPSC regulations the Company would be permitted to increase the amount requested to $681,000 and accelerate the effective date of the increase. On December 12, 2007, the NYPSC granted Corning Natural Gas Corporation ("Corning") a 2.5% ($681,000) rate increase effective December 17, 2007. In addition, the NYPSC allowed Corning to retain $250,000 in revenue from gas producers relevant to producer interconnects with the Corning system. Because the NYPSC imputed $250,000 in revenue from gas producers interconnected with the Corning system in its determination of the $681,000 rate relief, the NYPSC allowed Corning to retain the first $250,000 of such revenues and 10 percent of any amount above that level.  

The Company's primary business is natural gas distribution. We serve approximately 14,500 customers through 325 miles of pipeline. Residential growth in our service territory is dependent on overall economic activity. Several significant employers have recently announced expansions. The Company's major growth opportunities exist in the industrial market, as well as connecting to local gas production. Increased focus will be given to efficient operations and improving infrastructure.

Our key performance indicators are net income, stockholders' equity and the safety of our system.

For the three months ended December 31, 2007 results were better than the same periods in 2006. Lower revenue in 2007 was primarily the result of a one time revenue item in 2006. Operating expenses were lower due to improved operation. The other taxes and depreciation expenses were higher due to Company's significant investment in infrastructure.

As a regulated utility company, stockholders equity is an important performance indicator for us. The NYPSC allows us to earn a just and reasonable return on stockholders' equity. Stockholders' equity is therefore a precursor of future earnings potential. In 2007, stockholders' equity increased by $4.5 million due, in part, to a rights offering to holders of our common stock in which we raised $4.6 million net of expenses. Going forward, we continue to focus on rebuilding stockholders' equity.

Other indicators that are tracked involve safe and efficient operations. These include leak repair, main and service replacements and customer service metrics. During 2007 the Company made a significant effort to improve its infrastructure and we intend to continue this program in 2008. More than $1.8 million was invested in line, meter and service replacement. We repaired 189 leaks and replaced 214 services and 2.27 miles of gas main during the first three months of fiscal 2008.

Gas supply is the largest expense of the Company. The Company signed an asset management agreement with Merrill Lynch Commodities in 2007 to be the Company's agent in managing our upstream storage and pipeline contracts.

We had net income of $154,547 or $.191 per share in the first quarter of 2008 compared to $47,456 or $.094 per share in the first quarter of 2007.

Utility operating revenue decreased $372,728 in the three months ended December 31, 2007 compared to the same period last year due to the recognition of one time revenue in the prior year.

Looking forward, we anticipate the Company's cost of gas will remain stable because of the quantity of gas the Company has in storage as well as its gas purchasing program. Margins are also expected to outperform same period 2007 as the result of our latest rate case.

Purchased gas expense decreased $144,456 to $3,257,582 in the three months ended December 31, 2007 compared to $3,402,038 in the same period last year due primarily to the lower gas cost. Other operating and maintenance expense decreased in the first quarter of 2008 to $1,441,404 compared to $1,487,432 in the first quarter of 2007 due primarily to more efficient operation. Depreciation expense increased to $172,992 in the first quarter of 2008 from $154,641 in 2007 due to increased investment in plant property and equipment.

Internally generated cash from operating activities consists of net income, adjusted for non-cash expenses and changes in operating assets and liabilities. Non-cash items include depreciation and amortization, gain on sale of securities, deferred income taxes and losses on sale of discontinued operations. Over or under recovered gas costs significantly impact cash flow. In addition, there are significant year-to-year changes in regulatory assets that impact cash flow. Cash flows from investing activities consist primarily of capital expenditures.

During the third quarter of 2007 we conducted a rights offering pursuant to a May 2006 order of the NYPSC that required us to conduct an equity offering and make various capital investments. The rights offering provided holders of our common stock with a basic privilege whereby each holder had the right to purchase, at the price of $16.00, one investment unit for each share of common stock held. Each investment unit consisted of one share of common stock and one four-year warrant to purchase .7 shares of our common stock at a price of $19.00. The rights offering also provided shareholders with an over subscription privilege whereby any shareholder fully exercising his/her rights under the basic subscription privilege would be entitled to subscribe to additional investment units also at $16.00 per unit. Through the rights offering, we raised $4.6 million (net of expenses). We have already begun using these funds for capital investments. Capital expenditures have historically exceeded $1.0 million annually and will increase significantly due to a mandate in our recently approved rate order to improve our infrastructure.

Cash flows from financing activities consist of repayment of long-term debt and borrowings and repayments under our lines-of-credit. For our consolidated operations, we had $6.6 million during 2007 available through lines of credit at a local bank. The amount outstanding under these lines at December 31, 2007 was $5.375 million. As security for our line of credit, collateral assignments have been executed which assign to the lender various rights in the investment trust account. In addition, our lender has a purchase money interest in and to all natural gas purchases by us utilizing funds advanced by the bank under the line-of-credit agreement and all proceeds of sale thereof and accounts receivable pertaining to such sale. We rely heavily on our credit lines to finance gas purchases that the Company places in storage.

We have $9.7 million in long term debt outstanding. We repaid $104,000 in the first quarter of 2008 consistent with the requirements of our debt instruments.

In 2007 we entered in to an asset management agreement with Merrill Lynch Commodities and purchased $3.8 million of gas by the end of September 2007 that was placed into storage. During the first quarter of 2008 we withdrew gas from storage and by December 31, 2007 had $3.05 million left in storage. As the result of these actions, we anticipate that we will have sufficient gas to supply our customers for the 2007-2008 winter season.

The Company has no off balance sheet arrangements.

As a regulated public utility, our earnings are primarily determined by a rate of return set by NYPSC on the investments in our facilities and equipment (i.e., our rate base). On June 28, 2007 the Company filed a rate case with the NYPSC requesting an increase of $581,038 for rates to become effective June 2008. In November 2007, we amended our June 28, 2007 filing to make the rate case a mini filing so that under the NYPSC regulations the Company would be permitted to increase the amount requested to $681,000 and accelerate the effective date of the increase. On December 12, 2007, the NYPSC granted us a 2.5% ($681,000) rate increase effective December 17, 2007. In addition, the NYPSC allowed us to retain $250,000 in revenue from gas producers relevant to producer interconnects with the Corning system. Because the NYPSC imputed $250,000 in revenue from gas producers interconnected with the Corning system in its determination of the $681,000 rate relief, the NYPSC allowed us to retain the first $250,000 of such revenues and 10 percent of any amount above that level.  

The Company's significant accounting policies are described in the notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. It is increasingly important to understand that the application of generally accepted accounting principles involve certain assumptions, judgments and estimates that affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Thus, the application of these principles can result in varying results from company to company. The most significant principles that impact the Company are discussed below.

The Company records revenues from residential and commercial customers based on meters read on a cycle basis throughout each month, while certain large industrial and utility customers' meters are read at the end of each month. The Company does not accrue revenue for gas delivered but not yet billed, as the NYPSC requires that such accounting must be adopted during a rate proceeding, which the Company has not done. The Company does not currently anticipate adopting unbilled revenue recognition and does not believe it would have a material impact in financial results. The Company's tariffs contain mechanisms that provide for the recovery of the cost of gas applicable to firm customers, which includes estimates. Under these mechanisms, the Company periodically adjusts its rates to reflect increases and decreases in the cost of gas. Annually, the Company reconciles the difference between the total gas costs collected from customers and the cost of gas. The Company defers any excess or deficiency and subsequently either recovers it from, or refunds it to, customers over the following twelve-month period. To the extent estimates are inaccurate, a regulatory asset on the balance sheet is increased or decreased.

All of the Company's business is subject to regulation. The Company's regulated utility records the results of its regulated activities in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 71, "Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation", which results in differences in the application of generally accepted accounting principles between regulated and non-regulated businesses. SFAS No. 71 requires the recording of regulatory assets and liabilities for certain transactions that would have been treated as revenue and expense in non-regulated businesses. In certain circumstances, SFAS No. 71 allows entities whose rates are determined by third-party regulators to defer costs as "regulatory" assets in the balance sheet to the extent that the entity expects to recover these costs in future rates. Management believes that currently available facts support the continued application of SFAS No. 71 and that all regulatory assets and liabilities are recoverable or refundable through the regulatory environment.

The amounts reported in the Company's financial statements related to its pension and other post-retirement benefits are determined on an actuarial basis, which uses many assumptions in the calculation of such amounts. These assumptions include the discount rate, the expected return on plan assets, the rate of compensation increase and, for other post-retirement benefits, the expected annual rate of increase in per capita cost of covered medical and prescription benefits. Changes in actuarial assumptions and actuarial experience could have a material impact on the amount of pension and post-retirement benefit costs and funding requirements experienced by the Company. However, the Company expects to recover substantially its entire net periodic pension and other post-retirement benefit costs attributed to employees in its utility segment in accordance with the applicable NYPSC authorization. For financial reporting purposes, the difference between the amounts of such costs as determined under applicable accounting principles is recorded as either a regulatory asset or liability.

This report contains statements which, to the extent they are not recitations of historical facts, constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (Reform Act). In this respect, the words "estimate", "project", "anticipate", "expect", "intend", "believe" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. All such forward-looking statements are intended to be subject to the safe harbor protection provided by the Reform Act. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that our expectations will be achieved. As forward looking statements, these statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the expected results. Accordingly, actual results may differ materially from those expressed in any forward looking statements. Factors that could cause results to differ materially from our management's expectations include, but are not limited to, those listed under Item 1A - "Risk Factors" of the Company's Form 10-K in addition to:

 Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement in light of new information or future events.

The Company's exposure to interest rate risk arises from borrowing under short-term debt instruments. At December 31, 2007, these instruments consisted of a term loan and bank credit line borrowings outstanding of $6,356,657. The interest rate (30 day Libor plus 1.85 BP) on this loan and these lines was 7.09 percent at December 31, 2007.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our "disclosure controls and procedures" (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the evaluation date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that material information relating to us and our consolidated subsidiaries is recorded, processed, summarized and reported in a timely manner.

Changes in Internal Controls. There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

The Company has nothing to report under this item.

The Company has nothing to report under this item.

The Company has nothing to report under this item.

The Company has nothing to report under this item.

31.2* Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1* Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2* Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

____________

* Filed or furnished herewith