UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-07866
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
300 S.E. 2nd Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-1923
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Craig S. Tyle, One Franklin Parkway, San Mateo, CA 94403-1906
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (954) 527-7500_
Date of fiscal year end: _8/31__
Date of reporting period: 8/31/13__
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders.
Contents | ||||
Annual Report | Financial Highlights and | Tax Information | 34 | |
Statement of Investments | 10 | |||
Templeton Emerging Markets | Annual Meeting of | |||
Income Fund | 1 Financial Statements | 18 | Shareholders | 35 |
Performance Summary | 5 Notes to Financial Statements | 21 | Dividend Reinvestment and | |
Cash Purchase Plan | 36 | |||
Important Notice to | Report of Independent | |||
Shareholders | 7 Registered Public | Board Members and Officers | 39 | |
Accounting Firm | 33 | |||
Shareholder Information | 44 |
Annual Report
Templeton Emerging Markets
Income Fund
Your Funds Goals and Main Investments: Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
seeks high, current income, with a secondary goal of capital appreciation, by investing, under normal
market conditions, at least 80% of its total net assets in income-producing securities of sovereign or
sovereign-related entities and private sector companies in emerging market countries.
Performance data represent past |
performance, which does not |
guarantee future results. |
Investment return and principal |
value will fluctuate, and you may |
have a gain or loss when you sell |
your shares. Current performance |
may differ from figures shown. |
Dear Shareholder:
This annual report for Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund covers the
fiscal year ended August 31, 2013.
Performance Overview
For the 12 months under review, Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
had cumulative total returns of -8.75% based on market price and +2.87%
based on net asset value. In comparison, U.S. dollar-denominated emerging
market bonds, as measured by the J.P. Morgan (JPM) Emerging Markets Bond
Index (EMBI) Global, had a -5.46% cumulative total return in U.S. dollar
terms for the same period.1 You can find the Funds long-term performance
data in the Performance Summary beginning on page 5.
1. Source: © 2013 Morningstar. All Rights Reserved. The information contained herein: (1) is proprietary to Morningstar
and/or its content providers; (2) may not be copied or distributed; and (3) is not warranted to be accurate, complete or
timely. Neither Morningstar nor its content providers are responsible for any damages or losses arising from any use of
this information. The index is unmanaged and includes reinvested interest. One cannot invest directly in an index, and
an index is not representative of the Funds portfolio.
The dollar value, number of shares or principal amount, and names of all portfolio holdings are listed in the Funds
Statement of Investments (SOI). The SOI begins on page 11.
Annual Report | 1
Portfolio Breakdown | |
Based on Total Net Assets as of 8/31/13 | |
Foreign Government & Agency Securities | |
57.8 | % |
Quasi-Sovereign & Corporate Bonds | |
34.6 | % |
Credit-Linked Notes | |
0.2 | % |
Short-Term Investments & Other Net Assets | |
7.4 | % |
Geographic Breakdown* | |
Based on Total Net Assets as of 8/31/13 | |
Other Europe | |
30.0 | % |
Americas | |
27.4 | % |
Middle East & Africa | |
19.9 | % |
Asia Pacific | |
17.8 | % |
Supranational** | |
0.7 | % |
Euro Area*** | |
0.4 | % |
Other Net Assets | |
3.8 | % |
*The Geographic Breakdown is a snapshot of the Fund
on 8/31/13 and may not reflect ongoing repositioning or
reinvestment of cash in the Fund.
**The Funds supranational investment was denomi-
nated in the U.S. dollar.
***The Funds euro area investment was in Slovenia.
Economic and Market Overview
The global economic recovery was mixed during the period under review. The recovery in emerging markets moderated after many economies had previously returned to or exceeded pre-crisis activity levels. Although some developed economies, such as those of Australia and some Scandinavian countries, have also enjoyed relatively strong recoveries in the aftermath of the global financial crisis, growth in the G-3 (U.S., eurozone and Japan) continued to be slow by the standards of previous recoveries. As fears eased surrounding the issues of sovereign debt in Europe, the possibility of another recession in the U.S., and a potential hard landing in China, financial market performance was positive. Improving sentiment, relatively strong fundamentals and continued provision of global liquidity supported assets with inherent risk, and equity markets generally performed well. Policymakers in the largest developed economies continued to increase their already unprecedented efforts to supply liquidity. Actions elsewhere in the world were mixed, with some policymakers less willing to reverse previous tightening efforts in response to the external environment.
Fears of possible reductions to stimulative government policies contributed to periods of risk aversion, when credit spreads widened and equities and other assets perceived as risky declined, alternating with periods of heightened risk appetite, when spreads narrowed and investors again favored assets with inherent risk. Against this backdrop, increased liquidity creation continued. For example, the Bank of Japan raised its inflation target and the U.S. Federal Reserve Board (Fed) extended quantitative easing and tried to be more transparent about its intentions. Economic data among the largest economies remained inconsistent with some observers predictions of a severe global economic slowdown.
During the period, the Fed increased the size of its quantitative easing program but announced later in the period that it might reduce the program at subsequent meetings. The announcement that the amount of bond purchases might be reduced led assets with inherent risk, particularly those in emerging markets, to sell off as market participants began to change their expectations of global liquidity conditions.
Investment Strategy
We invest selectively in bonds from emerging markets around the world to generate income for the Fund, seeking opportunities while monitoring changes in interest rates, currency exchange rates and credit risk. We seek to manage the Funds exposure to various currencies and may use currency forward contracts.
2 | Annual Report
Managers Discussion
The Fund purchased investment-grade and subinvestment-grade hard currency-denominated sovereign debt that typically compensates for greater credit risk by offering higher yields relative to U.S. Treasury and European benchmark bonds. Spreads widened between yields on sovereign credits and assets often considered safer, such as U.S. Treasuries, during the period. As financial markets began reflecting the underlying strength of emerging economies, many traditional emerging markets could borrow more cheaply than some eurozone members and, in several cases, U.S. states. U.S. dollar-denominated emerging market debt had a -5.46% total return during the period, as measured by the JPM EMBI Global.1 Overall, sovereign credit yield spreads over Treasuries widened 50 basis points (100 basis points equal one percentage point) during the period.2 Regionally, Latin American sovereign debt had a -6.41% total return, Asian debt -8.82%, and central and eastern European debt -2.97%.2
As part of its investment strategy, the Fund used currency forward contracts to limit or add exposure to various currencies.
Latin America
The Funds exposure to Latin American currencies detracted from absolute performance, while credit exposures contributed, and contributions from interest rate strategies were largely neutral. Mexicos central bank cut its policy rate, while rates were held constant in Chile. The central bank in Brazil cut rates 25 basis points before hiking rates 175 basis points during the period. The Mexican peso, Chilean peso and Brazilian real depreciated 0.72%, 5.79% and 14.65%, respectively, against the U.S. dollar.3
Europe-Middle East-Africa (EMEA)
The Funds credit and duration exposures in the EMEA region contributed to performance, while the effect of currency exposures was largely neutral. The euro appreciated 4.61% against the U.S. dollar during the period as the European Central Bank maintained its commitment to preserving the European Monetary Union.3 The Polish zloty appreciated 2.49% against the U.S. dollar, while the Swedish krona was largely unchanged.3 The Hungarian forint and Norwegian krone depreciated 1.39% and 5.48% against the U.S. dollar.3
Asia
The Funds exposure to Asian currencies detracted from performance as most currencies in the region depreciated against the U.S. dollar. Malaysias central
What is a currency forward |
contract? |
A currency forward contract is an |
agreement between the Fund and a |
counterparty to buy or sell a foreign |
currency at a specific exchange rate |
on a future date. |
What is duration? |
Duration is a measure of a bonds price |
sensitivity to interest rate changes. In |
general, a portfolio of securities with a |
lower duration can be expected to be |
less sensitive to interest rate changes |
than a portfolio with a higher duration. |
Top 10 Countries | ||
8/31/13 | ||
% of Total | ||
Net Assets | ||
Brazil | 8.6 | % |
Kazakhstan | 8.2 | % |
Mexico | 7.5 | % |
Russia | 7.0 | % |
Ukraine | 6.2 | % |
Ghana | 6.0 | % |
Hungary | 4.9 | % |
Argentina | 4.7 | % |
Sri Lanka | 3.9 | % |
United Arab Emirates | 3.7 | % |
Annual Report | 3
2. Source: J.P. Morgan. Regional returns are from subindexes of the JPM EMBI Global.
3. Source: IDC/Exshare.
Currency Breakdown | ||
8/31/13 | ||
% of Total | ||
Net Assets | ||
Americas | 96.8 | % |
U.S. Dollar | 83.0 | % |
Brazilian Real | 8.7 | % |
Mexican Peso | 5.1 | % |
Middle East & Africa | 5.1 | % |
Ghanaian Cedi | 3.8 | % |
Nigerian Naira | 1.3 | % |
Europe | 0.1 | % |
Serbian Dinar | 1.8 | % |
Polish Zloty | 0.7 | % |
Ukrainian Hryvnia | 0.2 | % |
Euro* | -2.6 | % |
Asia Pacific* | -2.0 | % |
Indonesian Rupiah | 3.4 | % |
Sri Lankan Rupee | 2.5 | % |
South Korean Won | 0.9 | % |
Malaysian Ringgit | 0.7 | % |
Japanese Yen* | -9.5 | % |
*A negative figure reflects net short exposure,
designed to benefit if the value of the associated
currency decreases. Conversely, the Funds value
would potentially decline if the value of the associated
currency increases.
bank kept its policy rate constant while Australia, India, the Philippines, Sri
Lanka and South Korea cut rates. Most of the currencies of these economies
depreciated against the U.S. dollar; the Australian dollar depreciated 13.82%,
the Indian rupee fell 15.81%, the Philippine peso declined 5.66%, and the
Malaysian ringgit lost 4.88%.3 The South Korean won, however, gained 2.21%
against the U.S. dollar.3 Contributions from credit and duration exposures in
the region were largely neutral.
Thank you for your continued participation in Templeton Emerging Markets
Income Fund. We look forward to serving your future investment needs.
Sincerely,
The foregoing information reflects our analysis, opinions and portfolio holdings as of August 31, 2013, the end of
the reporting period. The way we implement our main investment strategies and the resulting portfolio holdings
may change depending on factors such as market and economic conditions. These opinions may not be relied upon
as investment advice or an offer for a particular security. The information is not a complete analysis of every
aspect of any market, country, industry, security or the Fund. Statements of fact are from sources considered reli-
able, but the investment manager makes no representation or warranty as to their completeness or accuracy.
Although historical performance is no guarantee of future results, these insights may help you understand our
investment management philosophy.
Performance Summary as of 8/31/13
Your dividend income will vary depending on dividends or interest paid by securities in the Funds portfolio, adjusted for operating expenses. Capital gain distributions are net profits realized from the sale of portfolio securities. Total return reflects reinvestment of the Funds dividends and capital gain distributions, if any, and any unrealized gains or losses. Total returns do not reflect any sales charges paid at inception or brokerage commissions paid on secondary market purchases. The performance table does not reflect any taxes that a shareholder would pay on Fund dividends, capital gain distributions, if any, or any realized gains on the sale of Fund shares.
Price and Distribution Information | |||||||||||
Symbol: TEI | Change | 8/31/13 | 8/31/12 | ||||||||
Net Asset Value (NAV) | -$ | 1.33 | $ | 14.58 | $ | 15.91 | |||||
Market Price (NYSE) | -$ | 3.16 | $ | 13.85 | $ | 17.01 | |||||
Distributions (9/1/128/31/13) | |||||||||||
Dividend Income | $ | 1.4442 | |||||||||
Long-Term Capital Gain | $ | 0.4239 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 1.8681 | |||||||||
Performance | |||||||||||
1-Year | 5-Year | 10-Year | |||||||||
Cumulative Total Return1 | |||||||||||
Based on change in NAV2 | + | 2.87 | % | + | 62.64 | % | + | 173.30 | % | ||
Based on change in market price3 | -8.75 | % | + | 60.79 | % | + | 173.72 | % | |||
Average Annual Total Return1 | |||||||||||
Based on change in NAV2 | + | 2.87 | % | + | 10.22 | % | + | 10.58 | % | ||
Based on change in market price3 | -8.75 | % | + | 9.96 | % | + | 10.59 | % | |||
Average Annual Total Return (9/30/13)4 | |||||||||||
Based on change in NAV2 | + | 2.39 | % | + | 12.39 | % | + | 10.45 | % | ||
Based on change in market price3 | -5.43 | % | + | 16.55 | % | + | 10.84 | % |
Performance data represent past performance, which does not guarantee future results. Investment return and principal
value will fluctuate, and you may have a gain or loss when you sell your shares. Current performance may differ from
figures shown.
Annual Report | 5
Performance Summary (continued)
Endnotes
All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal. Changes in interest rates will affect the value of the Funds portfolio and its share price and yield. Bond prices generally move in the opposite direction of interest rates. Thus, as prices of bonds in the Fund adjust to a rise in interest rates, the Funds share price may decline. Special risks are associated with foreign investing, including currency fluctuations, economic instability and political developments of countries where the Fund invests. The Funds investments in emerging market countries are subject to all of the risks of foreign investing generally, and have additional heightened risks due to these markets smaller size and lesser liquidity and lack of established legal, political, business and social frameworks to support securities markets, including: delays in settling portfolio securities transactions; currency and capital controls; greater sensitivity to interest rate changes; pervasiveness of corruption and crime; currency exchange rate volatility; and inflation, deflation or currency devaluation. The Funds use of foreign currency techniques involves special risks as such techniques may not achieve the anticipated benefits and/or may result in losses to the Fund. Also, as a nondi-versified investment company, the Fund may invest in a relatively small number of issuers and, as a result, be subject to a greater risk of loss with respect to its portfolio securities. The Fund is actively managed but there is no guarantee that the managers investment decisions will produce the desired results.
1. Total return calculations represent the cumulative and average annual changes in value of an investment over the periods indicated.
2. Assumes reinvestment of distributions based on net asset value.
3. Assumes reinvestment of distributions based on the dividend reinvestment and cash purchase plan.
4. In accordance with SEC rules, we provide standardized average annual total return information through the latest calendar quarter.
6 | Annual Report
Important Notice to Shareholders
Share Repurchase Program
The Funds Board of Trustees (Board) has approved a modification to the Funds previously announced open-market share repurchase program to authorize the Fund to repurchase up to 10% of the Funds outstanding shares in open-market transactions, at the discretion of management. Under the Funds previously announced open-market share repurchase program, no specific amount of the Funds outstanding shares were authorized for repurchase.
The Boards action provides greater flexibility by enabling the Fund to engage in open-market repurchases under a continuing authorization for up to 10% of the Funds outstanding shares, at the discretion of Fund management. Subject to the 10% limitation, the timing and amount of repurchases would continue to be at the discretion of the investment manager. In exercising its discretion consistent with its portfolio management responsibilities, the investment manager will take into account various other factors, including, but not limited to, the level of the discount, the Funds performance, portfolio holdings, dividend history, market conditions, cash on hand, the availability of other attractive investments and whether the sale of certain portfolio securities would be undesirable because of liquidity concerns or because the sale might subject the Fund to adverse tax consequences. Any repurchases would be made on a national securities exchange at the prevailing market price, subject to exchange requirements, Federal securities laws and rules that restrict repurchases, and the terms of any outstanding leverage or borrowing of the Fund. If and when the Funds 10% threshold is reached, no further repurchases could be completed until authorized by the Board. Until the 10% threshold is reached, Fund management will have the flexibility to rapidly commence share repurchases if and when it is determined to be appropriate in light of prevailing circumstances. As with the current share repurchase program, the modified share repurchase program is intended to benefit shareholders by enabling the Fund to repurchase shares at a discount to net asset value, thereby increasing the proportionate interest of each remaining shareholder in the Fund.
Inflation Index Swaps
The Board authorized the Fund to use inflation index swaps in an amount up to 5% of the Funds net assets (as measured by notional value), and consistent with the Funds investment goal, approved a change in the Funds investment policies to include such authority to use inflation index swaps.
An inflation index swap is a contract between the Fund and a swap counter-party (generally a brokerage firm, bank or other financial institution) to make payments based on the cumulative percentage increase in an index that serves as a measure of inflation (typically, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) in the
Annual Report | 7
Important Notice to Shareholders (continued)
United States, but other measures of inflation throughout the world may also be used) in exchange for a regular payment based on a compounded fixed rate. For example, the Fund may enter into a swap whereby it receives the increase in the CPI over a one year period, and pays in return a set rate for each maturity, typically represented by the expected break-even rate. Each partys payment obligation under the swap is determined by reference to a specified notional amount of money. Typically, an inflation index swap is priced on a zero-coupon basis, with payment obligations netted and exchanged upon maturity.
Entering into over-the-counter (OTC) swap instruments such as inflation index swaps requires the execution of an International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) Master Agreement, as supplemented by an applicable schedule and credit support annex (CSA), which sets out the rights and obligations of the Fund and the counterparty. ISDA agreements generally include requirements for each party regarding the pledging of collateral as credit support of any outstanding receivables.
The primary use of inflation index swaps will be to gain exposure to inflation when the portfolio manager believes inflation expectations will increase from where they are currently priced in the market. For example, the Fund could enter into a long position in an inflation index swap and pay the fixed rate set at the time of the trade, then receive the actual CPI at the end of the swap contracts term. The Fund could also use inflation index swaps to adjust exposure to or hedge against inflation. For example, inflation index swaps may be used by the Fund to hedge the inflation risk of nominal bonds in a Funds portfolio (i.e., non-inflation indexed bonds).
The values of inflation index swaps are expected to change in response to changes in inflation expectations in the market as represented by break-even rates. If inflation expectations increase at a faster rate than anticipated at the time the swap is entered into, the swap will increase in value and vice versa.
The Funds investments in inflation index swaps would involve certain risks, including risk of loss. Inflation rates, and consequently the value of an infla-tion index swap, may change drastically as a result of unexpected shifts in the global economy. If the investment manager, in using swap agreements, is incorrect in its forecasts of market values, interest rates, inflation, currency exchange rates or other applicable factors, the investment performance of the Fund will be less than its performance would have been if it had not used
8 | Annual Report
Important Notice to Shareholders (continued)
the swap agreements. While management believes that there currently exists a liquid market for inflation index swaps, there can be no assurance that a liquid secondary market will exist for any particular inflation index swap, or at any particular time, and the Fund may have difficulty affecting transactions in particular inflation index swaps.
Inflation index swaps are negotiated and traded OTC directly with each coun-terparty, and as such subject the Fund to counterparty risk. Counterparty risk involves the risk that the counterparty will not complete the trade according to the negotiated terms. To help mitigate this risk, inflation index swaps, like other OTC derivatives, are subject to the terms of an ISDA Master Agreement between each Fund and the counterparty. The Fund can only complete infla-tion index swaps with counterparties where an ISDA Master Agreement is in place. The ISDA Master Agreement and its accompanying CSA provide for collateral movement between the counterparty and the Fund as credit support under the Funds internal collateral management policies.
Certain swaps and options thereon are now under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) while security-based swaps are under the exclusive jurisdiction of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and mixed-swaps are subject to the joint jurisdiction of the CFTC and the SEC. Based upon rules of the CFTC and the SEC, the CFTC will have jurisdiction over the particular inflation index swaps described here.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 gives the CFTC and the SEC authority to impose capital and margin requirements on swaps dealers and major swap participants and to mandate that certain swaps be centrally cleared. The CFTC has not, to date, mandated that inflation index swaps be centrally cleared; should the CFTC do so in the future, management anticipates that such swaps required to be centrally cleared would be handled and settled in much the same way as a futures contract is executed and settled, including a requirement that the Fund post initial and variation margin, although the margin required for swaps is likely to be higher. The regulatory environment continues to evolve and management is monitoring developments.
Annual Report | 9
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Financial Highlights
Year Ended August 31, | |||||||||||||||
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||
Per share operating performance | |||||||||||||||
(for a share outstanding throughout the year) | |||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of year | $ | 15.91 | $ | 16.61 | $ | 16.27 | $ | 13.82 | $ | 14.45 | |||||
Income from investment operations: | |||||||||||||||
Net investment incomea | 1.07 | 1.08 | 1.17 | 1.12 | 1.03 | ||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) | (0.54 | ) | (0.37 | ) | 0.41 | 2.45 | (0.22 | ) | |||||||
Total from investment operations | 0.53 | 0.71 | 1.58 | 3.57 | 0.81 | ||||||||||
Less distributions from: | |||||||||||||||
Net investment income and net foreign currency gains | (1.44 | ) | (1.34 | ) | (1.19 | ) | (1.05 | ) | (1.36 | ) | |||||
Net realized gains | (0.42 | ) | (0.07 | ) | (0.05 | ) | (0.07 | ) | (0.08 | ) | |||||
Total distributions | (1.86 | ) | (1.41 | ) | (1.24 | ) | (1.12 | ) | (1.44 | ) | |||||
Net asset value, end of year | $ | 14.58 | $ | 15.91 | $ | 16.61 | $ | 16.27 | $ | 13.82 | |||||
Market value, end of yearb | $ | 13.85 | $ | 17.01 | $ | 17.22 | $ | 16.18 | $ | 13.11 | |||||
Total return (based on market value per share) | (8.75 | )% | 8.17 | % | 14.60 | % | 33.26 | % | 6.57 | % | |||||
Ratios to average net assets | |||||||||||||||
Expenses | 1.09 | %c | 1.15 | % | 1.20 | %c | 1.19 | %c | 1.20 | %c | |||||
Net investment income | 6.79 | % | 6.90 | % | 7.08 | % | 7.36 | % | 8.59 | % | |||||
Supplemental data | |||||||||||||||
Net assets, end of year (000s) | $ | 699,414 | $ | 759,024 | $ | 789,998 | $ | 769,970 | $ | 653,992 | |||||
Portfolio turnover rate | 14.53 | % | 16.56 | % | 24.59 | % | 13.26 | % | 34.03 | % | |||||
aBased on average daily shares outstanding. | |||||||||||||||
bBased on the last sale on the New York Stock Exchange. | |||||||||||||||
cBenefit of expense reduction rounds to less than 0.01%. |
10 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | Annual Report
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Statement of Investments, August 31, 2013
Principal Amount* | Value | |||
Foreign Government and Agency Securities 57.8% | ||||
Argentina 4.7% | ||||
Government of Argentina, | ||||
a GDP Linked Securities, 6.266%, 12/15/35 | 219,745,000 | $ | 16,316,066 | |
senior bond, 7.00%, 10/03/15 | 18,000,000 | 16,397,000 | ||
32,713,066 | ||||
Bosnia & Herzegovina 0.6% | ||||
b Government of Bosnia & Herzegovina, FRN, 1.063%, 12/11/17 | 7,660,090 | DEM | 4,452,121 | |
Brazil 8.6% | ||||
Nota Do Tesouro Nacional, | ||||
10.00%, 1/01/14 | 20,000c BRL | 8,398,948 | ||
d Index Linked, 6.00%, 5/15/15 | 22,323c BRL | 22,202,078 | ||
d Index Linked, 6.00%, 8/15/16 | 7,319c BRL | 7,239,602 | ||
d Index Linked, 6.00%, 5/15/17 | 134c BRL | 132,652 | ||
d Index Linked, 6.00%, 8/15/18 | 4,055c BRL | 4,010,850 | ||
d Index Linked, 6.00%, 5/15/45 | 17,820c BRL | 17,908,361 | ||
59,892,491 | ||||
Croatia 1.2% | ||||
e Government of Croatia, 144A, 6.75%, 11/05/19 | 7,920,000 | 8,380,350 | ||
El Salvador 0.4% | ||||
e Government of El Salvador, 144A, 7.65%, 6/15/35 | 2,650,000 | 2,582,067 | ||
Georgia 0.5% | ||||
e Government of Georgia, 144A, 6.875%, 4/12/21 | 3,050,000 | 3,227,281 | ||
Ghana 6.0% | ||||
Government of Ghana, | ||||
13.30%, 9/30/13 | 10,150,000 | GHS | 4,706,488 | |
13.00%, 6/02/14 | 9,110,000 | GHS | 4,052,667 | |
14.00%, 10/13/14 | 210,000 | GHS | 92,395 | |
24.00%, 5/25/15 | 7,690,000 | GHS | 3,764,107 | |
21.00%, 10/26/15 | 3,207,000 | GHS | 1,510,620 | |
19.24%, 5/30/16 | 11,745,000 | GHS | 5,348,419 | |
23.00%, 8/21/17 | 7,560,000 | GHS | 3,732,545 | |
e 144A, 8.50%, 10/04/17 | 2,029,000 | 2,206,781 | ||
e 144A, 7.875%, 8/07/23 | 15,169,086 | 14,770,897 | ||
f Reg S, 8.50%, 10/04/17 | 1,559,000 | 1,695,600 | ||
41,880,519 | ||||
Hungary 3.5% | ||||
Government of Hungary, | ||||
4.125%, 2/19/18 | 2,040,000 | 1,986,450 | ||
5.375%, 2/21/23 | 3,750,000 | 3,535,125 | ||
senior note, 3.50%, 7/18/16 | 190,000 | EUR | 251,669 | |
senior note, 4.375%, 7/04/17 | 560,000 | EUR | 740,597 | |
senior note, 3.875%, 2/24/20 | 535,000 | EUR | 661,869 |
Annual Report | 11
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Statement of Investments, August 31, 2013 (continued)
Principal Amount* | Value | |||
Foreign Government and Agency Securities (continued) | ||||
Hungary (continued) | ||||
Government of Hungary, (continued) | ||||
senior note, 6.375%, 3/29/21 | 15,000,000 | $ | 15,506,250 | |
f senior note, Reg S, 5.75%, 6/11/18 | 1,255,000 | EUR | 1,700,331 | |
24,382,291 | ||||
Indonesia 3.3% | ||||
Government of Indonesia, | ||||
FR31, 11.00%, 11/15/20 | 132,050,000,000 | IDR | 13,364,543 | |
FR36, 11.50%, 9/15/19 | 40,000,000,000 | IDR | 4,080,372 | |
FR40, 11.00%, 9/15/25 | 58,140,000,000 | IDR | 5,964,681 | |
23,409,596 | ||||
Iraq 3.1% | ||||
e Government of Iraq, 144A, 5.80%, 1/15/28 | 27,190,000 | 21,932,678 | ||
Latvia 1.7% | ||||
e Government of Latvia, 144A, 5.25%, 2/22/17 | 11,050,000 | 11,915,160 | ||
Lithuania 0.6% | ||||
e Government of Lithuania, 144A, 7.375%, 2/11/20 | 3,400,000 | 4,023,475 | ||
Mexico 3.0% | ||||
Government of Mexico, | ||||
8.00%, 12/19/13 | 1,653,500g MXN | 12,527,288 | ||
7.00%, 6/19/14 | 93,900g MXN | 719,435 | ||
9.50%, 12/18/14 | 626,140g MXN | 5,008,534 | ||
6.00%, 6/18/15 | 8,680g MXN | 67,034 | ||
8.00%, 12/17/15 | 250,400g MXN | 2,024,963 | ||
6.25%, 6/16/16 | 65,350g MXN | 510,051 | ||
20,857,305 | ||||
Mongolia 0.8% | ||||
e Government of Mongolia, senior note, 144A, 5.125%, 12/05/22 | 7,100,000 | 5,741,486 | ||
Romania 1.1% | ||||
f Government of Romania, senior note, Reg S, 5.25%, 6/17/16 | 5,460,000 | EUR | 7,744,232 | |
Russia 0.7% | ||||
f Government of Russia, senior bond, Reg S, 7.50%, 3/31/30 | 3,970,850 | 4,582,857 | ||
Serbia 3.3% | ||||
e Government of Serbia, senior note, 144A, 7.25%, 9/28/21 | 11,080,000 | 11,152,075 | ||
Serbia Treasury Note, 10.00%, | ||||
4/27/15 | 780,000,000 | RSD | 8,872,094 | |
9/14/15 | 205,300,000 | RSD | 2,315,795 | |
11/08/17 | 36,330,000 | RSD | 385,849 | |
22,725,813 |
12 | Annual Report
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Statement of Investments, August 31, 2013 (continued)
Principal Amount* | Value | |||
Foreign Government and Agency Securities (continued) | ||||
Slovenia 0.5% | ||||
e Government of Slovenia, senior note, 144A, 5.85%, 5/10/23 | 3,370,000 | $ | 3,180,859 | |
Sri Lanka 3.9% | ||||
Government of Sri Lanka, | ||||
e 144A, 7.40%, 1/22/15 | 3,500,000 | 3,677,188 | ||
e 144A, 5.875%, 7/25/22 | 7,750,000 | 6,984,688 | ||
A, 7.00%, 3/01/14 | 19,710,000 | LKR | 145,875 | |
A, 11.25%, 7/15/14 | 354,200,000 | LKR | 2,680,606 | |
A, 11.75%, 3/15/15 | 3,840,000 | LKR | 29,211 | |
A, 6.50%, 7/15/15 | 108,070,000 | LKR | 752,534 | |
A, 11.00%, 8/01/15 | 607,700,000 | LKR | 4,569,845 | |
A, 6.40%, 8/01/16 | 49,800,000 | LKR | 331,256 | |
A, 5.80%, 1/15/17 | 51,000,000 | LKR | 326,392 | |
A, 8.00%, 11/15/18 | 230,150,000 | LKR | 1,488,788 | |
A, 9.00%, 5/01/21 | 387,750,000 | LKR | 2,506,064 | |
B, 11.75%, 4/01/14 | 31,010,000 | LKR | 234,989 | |
B, 6.60%, 6/01/14 | 29,500,000 | LKR | 215,765 | |
B, 6.40%, 10/01/16 | 53,200,000 | LKR | 351,260 | |
B, 8.50%, 7/15/18 | 65,800,000 | LKR | 438,283 | |
C, 8.50%, 4/01/18 | 108,910,000 | LKR | 730,758 | |
D, 8.50%, 6/01/18 | 284,830,000 | LKR | 1,918,295 | |
27,381,797 | ||||
h Supranational 0.7% | ||||
f Eastern & Southern African Trade and Development Bank, Reg S, 6.875%, | ||||
1/09/16 | 5,000,000 | 5,156,250 | ||
Ukraine 5.7% | ||||
e Government of Ukraine, | ||||
144A, 9.25%, 7/24/17 | 1,330,000 | 1,305,063 | ||
144A, 7.75%, 9/23/20 | 19,840,000 | 17,611,075 | ||
senior bond, 144A, 7.80%, 11/28/22 | 3,780,000 | 3,288,505 | ||
senior note, 144A, 7.95%, 2/23/21 | 260,000 | 232,050 | ||
senior note, 144A, 7.50%, 4/17/23 | 6,080,000 | 5,217,400 | ||
e,i Kyiv Finance PLC (City of Kiev), loan participation, senior note, 144A, 9.375%, | ||||
7/11/16 | 12,940,000 | 12,235,676 | ||
39,889,769 | ||||
Venezuela 0.5% | ||||
Government of Venezuela, 10.75%, 9/19/13 | 3,800,000 | 3,809,310 | ||
Vietnam 1.0% | ||||
e Government of Vietnam, 144A, 6.75%, 1/29/20 | 6,835,000 | 7,240,828 | ||
Zambia 2.4% | ||||
e Government of Zambia International Bond, 144A, 5.375%, 9/20/22 | 20,000,000 | 17,000,000 | ||
Total Foreign Government and Agency Securities (Cost $420,579,640) | 404,101,601 |
Annual Report | 13
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Statement of Investments, August 31, 2013 (continued)
Principal Amount* | Value | ||||
Quasi | -Sovereign and Corporate Bonds 34.6% | ||||
Hungary 1.4% | |||||
e Magyar Export-Import Bank RT, senior note, 144A, 5.50%, 2/12/18 | 10,000,000 | $ | 10,010,100 | ||
India 0.5% | |||||
e ICICI Bank Ltd., sub. bond, 144A, 6.375% to 4/30/17, FRN thereafter, | |||||
4/30/22 | 4,100,000 | 3,751,500 | |||
Kazakhstan 8.2% | |||||
e HSBK | (Europe) BV, senior note, 144A, 7.25%, 5/03/17 | 26,035,000 | 27,584,603 | ||
e Kazakhstan Temir Zholy Finance BV, senior note, 144A, 6.375%, 10/06/20 | 6,090,000 | 6,424,341 | |||
e KazMunayGas National Co., senior note, 144A, 9.125%, 7/02/18 | 19,200,000 | 23,016,000 | |||
57,024,944 | |||||
Mexico 4.0% | |||||
e Cemex Espana Luxembourg, senior secured note, 144A, 9.25%, 5/12/20 | 2,355,000 | 2,493,356 | |||
e Cemex SAB de CV, senior secured note, 144A, 9.00%, 1/11/18 | 21,845,000 | 23,360,497 | |||
e,j Corporacion GEO SAB de CV, senior note, 144A, 8.875%, 3/27/22 | 8,420,000 | 1,852,400 | |||
27,706,253 | |||||
Peru 0.3% | |||||
e Peru Enhanced Pass-Through Finance Ltd., senior secured bond, A-1, 144A, zero | |||||
cpn., 5/31/18 | 2,562,668 | 2,319,972 | |||
Russia 6.3% | |||||
e,i Alfa Bond Issuance PLC (Alfa Bank OJSC), loan participation, | |||||
secured note, 144A, 7.875%, 9/25/17 | 6,550,000 | 7,214,006 | |||
senior note, 144A, 7.75%, 4/28/21 | 7,900,000 | 8,354,250 | |||
e,i Gaz Capital SA (OJSC Gazprom), loan participation, senior bond, 144A, 8.146%, | |||||
4/11/18 | 6,000,000 | 6,927,510 | |||
LUKOIL International Finance BV, | |||||
e 144A, 6.356%, 6/07/17 | 890,000 | 986,040 | |||
e 144A, 6.656%, 6/07/22 | 4,540,000 | 4,880,500 | |||
f Reg S, 6.356%, 6/07/17 | 2,300,000 | 2,549,435 | |||
f Reg S, 6.656%, 6/07/22 | 3,970,000 | 4,260,942 | |||
e,i RSHB Capital SA (Russian Agricultural Bank OJSC), loan participation, senior | |||||
note, 144A, 9.00%, 6/11/14 | 4,880,000 | 5,148,791 | |||
e TNK | -BP Finance SA, senior bond, 144A, 7.25%, 2/02/20 | 1,190,000 | 1,325,731 | ||
e,i VTB Capital SA (VTB Bank), loan participation, senior bond, 144A, 6.25%, | |||||
6/30/35 | 2,400,000 | 2,538,000 | |||
44,185,205 | |||||
South Africa 2.8% | |||||
b,e Edcon Holdings Pty. Ltd., secured note, 144A, FRN, 5.709%, 6/15/15 | 8,285,000 | EUR | 9,685,109 | ||
e Edcon Pty. Ltd., senior secured note, 144A, 9.50%, | |||||
3/01/18 | 7,250,000 | 6,647,344 | |||
3/01/18 | 2,828,000 | EUR | 3,401,626 | ||
19,734,079 |
14 | Annual Report
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Statement of Investments, August 31, 2013 (continued)
Principal Amount* | Value | |||
Quasi-Sovereign and Corporate Bonds (continued) | ||||
Trinidad and Tobago 0.8% | ||||
Petro Co. of Trinidad and Tobago Ltd., senior note, | ||||
e 144A, 9.75%, 8/14/19 | 4,500,000 | $ | 5,568,750 | |
f Reg S, 9.75%, 8/14/19 | 210,000 | 259,875 | ||
5,828,625 | ||||
Turkey 3.5% | ||||
e Akbank TAS, senior note, 144A, 6.50%, 3/09/18 | 2,588,000 | 2,646,126 | ||
e Finansbank AS, senior note, 144A, 5.50%, 5/11/16 | 8,425,000 | 8,245,969 | ||
e Turkiye Is Bankasi, sub. note, 144A, 6.00%, 10/24/22 | 3,000,000 | 2,675,550 | ||
f,i Willow No.2 (Yasar Holding SA), loan participation, secured note, Reg S, 9.625%, | ||||
10/07/15 | 10,900,000 | 10,901,635 | ||
24,469,280 | ||||
Ukraine 0.3% | ||||
e Financing of Infrastructure Projects State Enterprise, 144A, 8.375%, 11/03/17 | 2,000,000 | 1,811,170 | ||
United Arab Emirates 3.7% | ||||
e DP World Ltd., 144A, 6.85%, 7/02/37 | 13,500,000 | 12,952,440 | ||
e Dubai Electricity & Water Authority, senior note, 144A, 7.375%, 10/21/20 | 11,500,000 | 12,962,915 | ||
25,915,355 | ||||
United States 1.2% | ||||
General Electric Capital Corp., senior note, A, 8.50%, 4/06/18 | 101,000,000 | MXN | 8,445,788 | |
Venezuela 1.6% | ||||
Petroleos de Venezuela SA, senior sub. bond, 4.90%, 10/28/14 | 11,800,000 | 11,141,619 | ||
Total Quasi-Sovereign and Corporate Bonds (Cost $221,935,990) | 242,343,890 | |||
k Credit-Linked Notes (Cost $1,043,014) 0.2% | ||||
Ukraine 0.2% | ||||
e ING Americas Issuance BV, (Government of Ukraine), 144A, 5.50%, 8/25/15 | 9,882,800 | UAH | 1,110,175 | |
Total Investments before Short Term Investments | ||||
(Cost $643,558,644) | 647,555,666 | |||
Short Term Investments 3.6% | ||||
Foreign Government and Agency Securities 1.8% | ||||
Mexico 0.5% | ||||
l Mexico Treasury Bills, 9/19/13 - 4/30/14 | 5,026,580m MXN | 3,724,515 | ||
Nigeria 1.3% | ||||
l Nigeria Treasury Bills, 1/09/14 - 5/08/14 | 1,611,380,000 | NGN | 9,187,733 | |
Sri Lanka 0.0% | ||||
l Sri Lanka Treasury Bill, 10/11/13 | 4,590,000 | LKR | 34,235 | |
Total Foreign Government and Agency Securities (Cost $13,427,949) | 12,946,483 | |||
Total Investments before Money Market Funds (Cost $656,986,593) | 660,502,149 |
Annual Report | 15
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Statement of Investments, August 31, 2013 (continued)
Shares | Value | ||
Short Term Investments (continued) | |||
Money Market Funds (Cost $12,617,116) 1.8% | |||
United States 1.8% | |||
n,o Institutional Fiduciary Trust Money Market Portfolio | 12,617,116 | $ | 12,617,116 |
Total Investments (Cost $669,603,709) 96.2% | 673,119,265 | ||
Other Assets, less Liabilities 3.8% | 26,294,411 | ||
Net Assets 100.0% | $ | 699,413,676 |
Rounds to less than 0.1% of net assets.
*The principal amount is stated in U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated.
aSecurity is linked to the Argentine GDP and does not pay principal over the life of the security or at expiration. The holder is entitled to receive only variable payments, subject to
certain conditions, which are based on growth of the Argentine GDP and the principal or notional value of this GDP linked security.
bThe coupon rate shown represents the rate at period end.
cPrincipal amount is stated in 1,000 Brazilian Real Units.
dRedemption price at maturity is adjusted for inflation. See Note 1(g).
eSecurity was purchased pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933 and may be sold in transactions exempt from registration only to qualified institutional buyers or in
a public offering registered under the Securities Act of 1933. These securities have been deemed liquid under guidelines approved by the Funds Board of Trustees. At August 31,
2013, the aggregate value of these securities was $369,800,353, representing 52.87% of net assets.
fSecurity was purchased pursuant to Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933, which exempts from registration securities offered and sold outside of the United States. Such a
security cannot be sold in the United States without either an effective registration statement filed pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, or pursuant to an exemption from regis-
tration. These securities have been deemed liquid under guidelines approved by the Funds Board of Trustees. At August 31, 2013, the aggregate value of these securities was
$38,851,157, representing 5.55% of net assets.
gPrincipal amount is stated in 100 Mexican Peso Units.
hA supranational organization is an entity formed by two or more central governments through international treaties.
iSee Note 1(d) regarding loan participation notes.
jSee Note 8 regarding defaulted securities.
kSee Note 1(e) regarding credit-linked notes.
lThe security is traded on a discount basis with no stated coupon rate.
mPrincipal amount is stated in 10 Mexican Peso Units.
nNon-income producing.
oSee Note 7 regarding investments in the Institutional Fiduciary Trust Money Market Portfolio.
At August 31, 2013, the Fund had the following forward exchange contracts outstanding. See Note 1(c).
Forward Exchange Contracts | ||||||||||
Contract | Settlement | Unrealized | Unrealized | |||||||
Currency | Counterparty | Type | Quantity | Amount* | Date | Appreciation | Depreciation | |||
Ghana Cedi | BZWS | Buy | 1,780,000 | 852,899 | 9/10/13 | $ | | $ | (28,448 | ) |
Ghana Cedi | BZWS | Sell | 1,780,000 | 824,074 | 9/10/13 | | (377 | ) | ||
Euro | DBAB | Sell | 1,506,000 | 1,949,592 | 9/16/13 | | (41,146 | ) | ||
Ghana Cedi | BZWS | Buy | 1,395,324 | 629,943 | 10/07/13 | 7,831 | | |||
Euro | DBAB | Sell | 266,000 | 342,236 | 11/08/13 | | (9,454 | ) | ||
Euro | MSCO | Sell | 907,070 | 1,157,263 | 11/15/13 | | (42,045 | ) | ||
Japanese Yen | CITI | Sell | 624,500,000 | 7,157,675 | 1/10/14 | 788,876 | | |||
Euro | UBSW | Sell | 628,500 | 822,700 | 1/13/14 | | (8,475 | ) | ||
Japanese Yen | UBSW | Sell | 1,873,240,000 | 21,421,619 | 1/14/14 | 2,317,254 | |
16 | Annual Report
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Statement of Investments, August 31, 2013 (continued)
Forward Exchange Contracts (continued)
Contract | Settlement | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||
Currency | Counterparty | Type | Quantity | Amount* | Date | Appreciation | Depreciation | ||||
Japanese Yen | HSBK | Sell | 1,620,890,000 | 18,461,162 | 1/15/14 | $ | 1,930,271 | $ | | ||
Japanese Yen | DBAB | Sell | 626,420,000 | 7,060,322 | 1/16/14 | 671,631 | | ||||
Japanese Yen | UBSW | Sell | 1,770,880,000 | 19,953,353 | 1/16/14 | 1,892,620 | | ||||
Euro | BZWS | Sell | 2,547,416 | 3,371,416 | 1/27/14 | 2,343 | | ||||
Euro | UBSW | Sell | 362,390 | 484,280 | 2/26/14 | 4,948 | | ||||
Ghana Cedi | BZWS | Buy | 1,780,000 | 755,839 | 3/10/14 | 1,013 | | ||||
Euro | DBAB | Sell | 3,345,000 | 4,313,110 | 3/31/14 | | (111,894 | ) | |||
Euro | HSBK | Sell | 826,000 | 1,079,475 | 4/10/14 | | (13,261 | ) | |||
Euro | DBAB | Sell | 688,000 | 900,420 | 4/11/14 | | (9,756 | ) | |||
Euro | UBSW | Sell | 413,000 | 540,720 | 4/11/14 | | (5,650 | ) | |||
Euro | GSCO | Sell | 3,663,000 | 4,898,530 | 5/13/14 | 52,013 | | ||||
South Korean Won | JPHQ | Buy | 7,297,662,505 | 6,426,827 | 6/09/14 | 60,881 | | ||||
Polish Zloty | DBAB | Buy | 16,600,000 | 3,744,980 | EUR | 7/07/14 | 83,832 | | |||
Malaysian Ringgit | DBAB | Buy | 2,499,000 | 772,966 | 7/18/14 | | (29,701 | ) | |||
Malaysian Ringgit | DBAB | Buy | 3,942,000 | 1,213,745 | 7/22/14 | | (41,517 | ) | |||
Malaysian Ringgit | DBAB | Buy | 4,793,000 | 1,488,186 | 7/25/14 | | (63,100 | ) | |||
Malaysian Ringgit | JPHQ | Buy | 5,039,000 | 1,546,512 | 7/30/14 | | (48,639 | ) | |||
Euro | CITI | Sell | 358,630 | 477,870 | 8/11/14 | 3,140 | | ||||
Euro | DBAB | Sell | 359,450 | 477,181 | 8/15/14 | 1,356 | | ||||
Euro | MSCO | Sell | 907,070 | 1,203,673 | 8/15/14 | 2,932 | | ||||
Euro | DBAB | Sell | 1,347,000 | 1,798,972 | 8/20/14 | 15,822 | | ||||
Euro | JPHQ | Sell | 2,260,000 | 3,021,157 | 8/21/14 | 29,366 | | ||||
Euro | BZWS | Sell | 1,604,997 | 2,151,643 | 8/25/14 | 26,899 | | ||||
Euro | DBAB | Sell | 9,366,031 | 12,507,398 | 8/29/14 | 108,087 | | ||||
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 8,001,115 | (453,463 | ) | ||||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | $ | 7,547,652 | |||||||||
*In U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated. |
At August 31, 2013, the Fund had the following interest rate swap contracts outstanding. See Note 1(c). | ||||||||||
Interest Rate Swap Contracts | ||||||||||
Pay/Receive | Fixed | Expiration | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||
Counterparty | Floating Rate | Rate | Floating Rate | Notional Amount* | Date | Appreciation | Depreciation | |||
CITI | Receive | 3.440 | % | 3-month USD BBA LIBOR | 7,900,000 | 4/21/21 | $ | $ | (595,718 | ) |
*In U.S. Dollars unless otherwise indicated.
See Abbreviations on page 32.
Annual Report | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 17
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Financial Statements
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
August 31, 2013
Assets: | ||
Investments in securities: | ||
Cost - Unaffiliated issuers | $ | 656,986,593 |
Cost - Sweep Money Fund (Note 7) | 12,617,116 | |
Total cost of investments | $ | 669,603,709 |
Value - Unaffiliated issuers | $ | 660,502,149 |
Value - Sweep Money Fund (Note 7) | 12,617,116 | |
Total value of investments | 673,119,265 | |
Cash | 230,000 | |
Foreign currency, at value (cost $7,438,521) | 7,432,176 | |
Receivables: | ||
Interest | 12,701,018 | |
Due from brokers | 180,000 | |
Unrealized appreciation on forward exchange contracts | 8,001,115 | |
Total assets | 701,663,574 | |
Liabilities: | ||
Payables: | ||
Management fees | 604,081 | |
Unrealized depreciation on forward exchange contracts | 453,463 | |
Unrealized depreciation on OTC swap contracts | 595,718 | |
Deferred tax | 355,472 | |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 241,164 | |
Total liabilities | 2,249,898 | |
Net assets, at value | $ | 699,413,676 |
Net assets consist of: | ||
Paid-in capital | $ | 678,205,788 |
Undistributed net investment income | 5,978,365 | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | 9,873,988 | |
Accumulated net realized gain (loss) | 5,355,535 | |
Net assets, at value | $ | 699,413,676 |
Shares outstanding | 47,959,695 | |
Net asset value per share | $ | 14.58 |
18 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | Annual Report
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Financial Statements (continued)
Statement of Operations
for the year ended August 31, 2013
Investment income: | |||
Interest (net of foreign taxes of $272,259) | $ | 59,682,592 | |
Expenses: | |||
Management fees (Note 3a) | 6,588,217 | ||
Administrative fees (Note 3b) | 953,962 | ||
Transfer agent fees | 133,258 | ||
Custodian fees (Note 4) | 279,295 | ||
Reports to shareholders | 79,838 | ||
Registration and filing fees | 44,856 | ||
Professional fees | 65,803 | ||
Trustees fees and expenses | 71,658 | ||
Other | 20,824 | ||
Total expenses | 8,237,711 | ||
Expense reductions (Note 4) | (37 | ) | |
Net expenses | 8,237,674 | ||
Net investment income | 51,444,918 | ||
Realized and unrealized gains (losses): | |||
Net realized gain (loss) from: | |||
Investments | 15,366,481 | ||
Foreign currency transactions | 9,561,471 | ||
Swap contracts | (244,044 | ) | |
Net realized gain (loss) | 24,683,908 | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on: | |||
Investments | (55,724,625 | ) | |
Translation of other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies | 4,793,025 | ||
Change in deferred taxes on unrealized appreciation | 522,184 | ||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | (50,409,416 | ) | |
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) | (25,725,508 | ) | |
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | $ | 25,719,410 |
Annual Report | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | 19
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Financial Statements (continued)
Statements of Changes in Net Assets | ||||||
Year Ended August 31, | ||||||
2013 | 2012 | |||||
Increase (decrease) in net assets: | ||||||
Operations: | ||||||
Net investment income | $ | 51,444,918 | $ | 51,276,254 | ||
Net realized gain (loss) from investments, foreign currency transactions and swap contracts | 24,683,908 | 26,565,028 | ||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments, translation of other assets | ||||||
and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies and deferred taxes | (50,409,416 | ) | (44,434,534 | ) | ||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | 25,719,410 | 33,406,748 | ||||
Distributions to shareholders from: | ||||||
Net investment income and net foreign currency gains | (69,051,494 | ) | (63,588,210 | ) | ||
Net realized gains | (20,243,294 | ) | (3,210,158 | ) | ||
Total distributions to shareholders | (89,294,788 | ) | (66,798,368 | ) | ||
Capital share transactions: (Note 2) | 3,965,253 | 2,417,467 | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets | (59,610,125 | ) | (30,974,153 | ) | ||
Net assets: | ||||||
Beginning of year | 759,023,801 | 789,997,954 | ||||
End of year | $ | 699,413,676 | $ | 759,023,801 | ||
Undistributed net investment income included in net assets: | ||||||
End of year | $ | 5,978,365 | $ | 4,296,182 |
20 | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | Annual Report
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Notes to Financial Statements
1. ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund (Fund) is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, (1940 Act) as a closed-end investment company.
The following summarizes the Funds significant accounting policies.
a. Financial Instrument Valuation
The Funds investments in financial instruments are carried at fair value daily. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Under procedures approved by the Funds Board of Trustees (the Board), the Funds administrator, investment manager and other affiliates have formed the Valuation and Liquidity Oversight Committee (VLOC). The VLOC provides administration and oversight of the Funds valuation policies and procedures, which are approved annually by the Board. Among other things, these procedures allow the Fund to utilize independent pricing services, quotations from securities and financial instrument dealers, and other market sources to determine fair value.
Debt securities generally trade in the over-the-counter (OTC) market rather than on a securities exchange. The Funds pricing services use multiple valuation techniques to determine fair value. In instances where sufficient market activity exists, the pricing services may utilize a market-based approach through which quotes from market makers are used to determine fair value. In instances where sufficient market activity may not exist or is limited, the pricing services also utilize proprietary valuation models which may consider market characteristics such as benchmark yield curves, credit spreads, estimated default rates, anticipated market interest rate volatility, coupon rates, anticipated timing of principal repayments, underlying collateral, and other unique security features in order to estimate the relevant cash flows, which are then discounted to calculate the fair value. Securities denominated in a foreign currency are converted into their U.S. dollar equivalent at the foreign exchange rate in effect at the close of the NYSE on the date that the values of the foreign debt securities are determined. Investments in open-end mutual funds are valued at the closing net asset value.
Certain derivatives trade in the OTC market. The Funds pricing services use various techniques including industry standard option pricing models and proprietary discounted cash flow models to determine the fair value of those instruments. The Funds net benefit or obligation under the derivative contract, as measured by the fair market value of the contract, is included in net assets.
The Fund has procedures to determine the fair value of financial instruments for which market prices are not reliable or readily available. Under these procedures, the VLOC convenes on a regular basis to review such financial instruments and considers a number of factors, including significant unobservable valuation inputs, when arriving at fair value. The VLOC primarily employs a market-based approach which may use related or comparable assets or liabilities,
Annual Report | 21
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
1. | ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) |
a. | Financial Instrument Valuation (continued) |
recent transactions, market multiples, book values, and other relevant information for the investment to determine the fair value of the investment. An income-based valuation approach may also be used in which the anticipated future cash flows of the investment are discounted to calculate fair value. Discounts may also be applied due to the nature or duration of any restrictions on the disposition of the investments. Due to the inherent uncertainty of valuations of such investments, the fair values may differ significantly from the values that would have been used had an active market existed. The VLOC employs various methods for calibrating these valuation approaches including a regular review of key inputs and assumptions, transactional back-testing or disposition analysis, and reviews of any related market activity.
Trading in securities on foreign securities stock exchanges and OTC markets may be completed before the daily close of business on the NYSE. Occasionally, events occur between the time at which trading in a foreign security is completed and the close of the NYSE that might call into question the reliability of the value of a portfolio security held by the Fund. As a result, differences may arise between the value of the Funds portfolio securities as determined at the foreign market close and the latest indications of value at the close of the NYSE. In order to minimize the potential for these differences, the VLOC monitors price movements following the close of trading in foreign stock markets through a series of country specific market proxies (such as baskets of American Depositary Receipts, futures contracts and exchange traded funds). These price movements are measured against established trigger thresholds for each specific market proxy to assist in determining if an event has occurred that may call into question the reliability of the values of the foreign securities held by the Fund. If such an event occurs, the securities may be valued using fair value procedures, which may include the use of independent pricing services.
In addition, certain foreign markets may be open on days that the NYSE is closed, which could result in differences between the value of the Funds portfolio securities on the last business day and the last calendar day of the reporting period. Any significant security valuation changes due to an open foreign market are adjusted and reflected by the Fund for financial reporting purposes.
b. Foreign Currency Translation
Portfolio securities and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars based on the exchange rate of such currencies against U.S. dollars on the date of valuation. The Fund may enter into foreign currency exchange contracts to facilitate transactions denominated in a foreign currency. Purchases and sales of securities, income and expense items denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate in effect on the transaction date. Portfolio securities and assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies contain risks that those currencies will decline in value relative to the U.S. dollar. Occasionally, events may impact the availability or reliability of foreign exchange rates used to convert the U.S. dollar equivalent value. If such an event occurs, the foreign exchange rate will be valued at fair value using procedures established and approved by the Board.
22 | Annual Report
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
1. | ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) |
b. | Foreign Currency Translation (continued) |
The Fund does not separately report the effect of changes in foreign exchange rates from changes in market prices on securities held. Such changes are included in net realized and unrealized gain or loss from investments on the Statement of Operations.
Realized foreign exchange gains or losses arise from sales of foreign currencies, currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions and the difference between the recorded amounts of dividends, interest, and foreign withholding taxes and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. Net unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses arise from changes in foreign exchange rates on foreign denominated assets and liabilities other than investments in securities held at the end of the reporting period.
c. Derivative Financial Instruments
The Fund invested in derivatives in order to manage risk or gain exposure to various other investments or markets. Derivatives are financial contracts based on an underlying or notional amount, require no initial investment or an initial net investment that is smaller than would normally be required to have a similar response to changes in market factors, and require or permit net settlement. Derivatives contain various risks including the potential inability of the counterparty to fulfill their obligations under the terms of the contract, the potential for an illiquid secondary market, and/or the potential for market movements which expose the Fund to gains or losses in excess of the amounts shown on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Realized gain and loss and unrealized appreciation and depreciation on these contracts for the period are included in the Statement of Operations.
Derivative counterparty credit risk is managed through a formal evaluation of the creditworthiness of all potential counterparties. The Fund attempts to reduce its exposure to counterparty credit risk on OTC derivatives, whenever possible, by entering into International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) master agreements with certain counterparties. These agreements contain various provisions, including but not limited to collateral requirements, events of default, or early termination. Termination events applicable to the counterparty include certain deteriorations in the credit quality of the counterparty. Termination events applicable to the Fund include failure of the Fund to maintain certain net asset levels and/or limit the decline in net assets over various periods of time. In the event of default or early termination, the ISDA master agreement gives the non-defaulting party the right to net and close-out all transactions traded, whether or not arising under the ISDA agreement, to one net amount payable by one counterparty to the other. However, absent an event of default or early termination, OTC derivative assets and liabilities are presented gross and not offset in the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Early termination by the counterparty may result in an immediate payment by the Fund of any net liability owed to that counterparty under the ISDA agreement. At August 31, 2013, the Fund had OTC derivatives in a net liability position of $39,113.
Annual Report | 23
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
1. | ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) |
c. | Derivative Financial Instruments (continued) |
Collateral requirements differ by type of derivative. Collateral terms are contract specific for OTC derivatives. For OTC derivatives traded under an ISDA master agreement, posting of collateral is required by either the fund or the applicable counterparty if the total net exposure of all OTC derivatives with the applicable counterparty exceeds the minimum transfer amount, which typically ranges from $100,000 to $250,000, and can vary depending on the counterparty and the type of the agreement. Generally, collateral is determined at the close of fund business each day and any additional collateral required due to changes in derivative values may be delivered by the fund or the counterparty within a few business days. Collateral pledged and/or received by the fund, if any, is held in segregated accounts with the funds custodian/counterparty broker and can be in the form of cash and/or securities. Unrestricted cash may be invested according to the Funds investment objectives.
At August 31, 2013, the Fund received $5,957,698 in United Kingdom Treasury Bonds and Notes and United States Treasury Bonds and Notes as collateral for derivatives.
The Fund entered into OTC forward exchange contracts primarily to manage and/or gain exposure to certain foreign currencies. A forward exchange contract is an agreement between the Fund and a counterparty to buy or sell a foreign currency at a specific exchange rate on a future date.
The Fund entered into interest rate swap contracts primarily to manage interest rate risk. An interest rate swap is an agreement between the Fund and a counterparty to exchange cash flows based on the difference between two interest rates, applied to a notional principal amount. These agreements may be privately negotiated in the over-the-counter market (OTC interest rate swaps) or may be executed on a registered exchange (centrally cleared interest rate swaps). For centrally cleared interest rate swaps, required initial margin deposits of cash or securities are pledged by the Fund. Subsequent payments, known as variation margin, are made or received by the Fund, depending on fluctuations in the value of the centrally cleared interest rate swaps. Such variation margin is accounted for as a payable or receivable on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and settled daily until the contract is closed, at which time the gains or losses are realized. Over the term of the contract, contractually required payments to be paid and to be received are accrued daily and recorded as unrealized depreciation and appreciation until the payments are made, at which time they are realized.
See Note 10 regarding other derivative information.
d. Loan Participation Notes
The Fund invests in loan participation notes (Participations). Participations are loans originally issued to a borrower by one or more financial institutions (the Lender) and subsequently sold to other investors, such as the Fund. Participations typically result in the Fund having a contractual relationship only with the Lender, and not with the borrower. The Fund has the right to receive from the Lender any payments of principal, interest and fees which the Lender received
24 | Annual Report
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
1. | ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) |
d. | Loan Participation Notes (continued) |
from the borrower. The Fund generally has no rights to either enforce compliance by the borrower with the terms of the loan agreement or to any collateral relating to the original loan. As a result, the Fund assumes the credit risk of both the borrower and the Lender that is selling the Participation. The Participations may also involve interest rate risk and liquidity risk, including the potential default or insolvency of the borrower and/or the Lender.
e. Credit-Linked Notes
The Fund purchases credit-linked notes. Credit-linked notes are intended to replicate the economic effects that would apply had the Fund directly purchased the underlying reference asset. The risks of credit-linked notes include the potential default of the underlying reference asset, the potential inability of the Fund to dispose of the credit-linked note in the normal course of business, and the possible inability of the counterparties to fulfill their obligations under the contracts.
f. Income and Deferred Taxes
It is the Funds policy to qualify as a regulated investment company under the Internal Revenue Code. The Fund intends to distribute to shareholders substantially all of its taxable income and net realized gains to relieve it from federal income and excise taxes. As a result, no provision for U.S. federal income taxes is required.
The Fund may be subject to foreign taxation related to income received, capital gains on the sale of securities and certain foreign currency transactions in the foreign jurisdictions in which it invests. Foreign taxes, if any, are recorded based on the tax regulations and rates that exist in the foreign markets in which the Fund invests. When a capital gain tax is determined to apply the Fund records an estimated deferred tax liability in an amount that would be payable if the securities were disposed of on the valuation date.
The Fund recognizes the tax benefits of uncertain tax positions only when the position is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities based on the technical merits of the tax position. As of August 31, 2013, and for all open tax years, the Fund has determined that no liability for unrecognized tax benefits is required in the Funds financial statements related to uncertain tax positions taken on a tax return (or expected to be taken on future tax returns). Open tax years are those that remain subject to examination and are based on each tax jurisdiction statute of limitation.
g. Security Transactions, Investment Income, Expenses and Distributions
Security transactions are accounted for on trade date. Realized gains and losses on security transactions are determined on a specific identification basis. Interest income and estimated expenses are accrued daily. Amortization of premium and accretion of discount on debt securities are included in interest income. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date
Annual Report | 25
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
1. | ORGANIZATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) |
g. | Security Transactions, Investment Income, Expenses and Distributions (continued) |
and are determined according to income tax regulations (tax basis). Distributable earnings determined on a tax basis may differ from earnings recorded in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These differences may be permanent or temporary. Permanent differences are reclassified among capital accounts to reflect their tax character. These reclassifications have no impact on net assets or the results of operations. Temporary differences are not reclassified, as they may reverse in subsequent periods.
Inflation-indexed bonds are adjusted for inflation through periodic increases or decreases in the securitys interest accruals, face amount, or principal redemption value, by amounts corresponding to the rate of inflation as measured by an index. Any increase or decrease in the face amount or principal redemption value will be included as interest income on the Statement of Operations.
h. Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
i. Guarantees and Indemnifications
Under the Funds organizational documents, its officers and trustees are indemnified by the Fund against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Fund. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts with service providers that contain general indemnification clauses. The Funds maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Fund that have not yet occurred. Currently, the Fund expects the risk of loss to be remote.
2. SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST
At August 31, 2013, there were an unlimited number of shares authorized (without par value).
Transactions in the Funds shares were as follows:
Year Ended August 31, | ||||||
2013 | 2012 | |||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |||
Shares issued in reinvestment of distributions | 242,378 | $ | 3,965,253 | 159,418 | $ | 2,417,467 |
26 | Annual Report
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
2. SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST (continued)
The Board previously authorized an open-market share repurchase program pursuant to which the Fund may purchase, from time to time, Fund shares in open-market transactions, at the discretion of management. Effective February 26, 2013, the Board approved a modification to the Funds previously announced open-market share repurchase program to authorize the Fund to repurchase up to 10% of the Funds shares outstanding in open market transactions as of that date, at the discretion of management. Since the inception of the program, the Fund had repurchased a total of 610,500 shares. During the years ended August 31, 2013 and August 31, 2012, there were no shares repurchased.
3. TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES
Franklin Resources, Inc. is the holding company for various subsidiaries that together are referred to as Franklin Templeton Investments. Certain officers and trustees of the Fund are also officers and/or directors of the following subsidiaries:
Subsidiary | Affiliation |
Franklin Advisers, Inc. (Advisers) | Investment manager |
Franklin Templeton Services, LLC (FT Services) | Administrative manager |
a. Management Fees
The Fund pays an investment management fee to Advisers based on the average daily net assets of the Fund as follows:
Annualized Fee Rate | Net Assets | |
1.00 | % | Up to and including $1 billion |
0.98 | % | Over $1 billion, up to and including $5 billion |
0.96 | % | Over $5 billion, up to and including $10 billion |
0.94 | % | Over $10 billion, up to and including $15 billion |
0.92 | % | Over $15 billion, up to and including $20 billion |
0.90 | % | In excess of $20 billion |
Effective July 1, 2013, the Fund combined its investment management and administration agreements as approved by the Board. The fees paid under the combined agreement do not exceed the aggregate fees that were paid under the separate agreements.
Prior to July 1, 2013, the Fund paid fees to Advisers based on the average daily net assets of the Fund as follows:
Annualized Fee Rate | Net Assets | |
0.850 | % | Up to and including $1 billion |
0.830 | % | Over $1 billion, up to and including $5 billion |
0.810 | % | Over $5 billion, up to and including $10 billion |
0.790 | % | Over $10 billion, up to and including $15 billion |
0.770 | % | Over $15 billion, up to and including $20 billion |
0.750 | % | In excess of $20 billion |
Annual Report | 27
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
3. | TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES (continued) |
b. | Administrative Fees |
Effective July 1, 2013, under an agreement with Advisers, FT Services provides administrative services to the Fund. The fee is paid by Advisers based on the Funds average daily net assets, and is not an additional expense of the Fund.
Prior to July 1, 2013, the Fund paid administrative fees to FT Services of 0.15% per year of the average daily net assets of the Fund.
4. EXPENSE OFFSET ARRANGEMENT
The Fund has entered into an arrangement with its custodian whereby credits realized as a result of uninvested cash balances are used to reduce a portion of the Funds custodian expenses. During the year ended August 31, 2013, the custodian fees were reduced as noted in the Statement of Operations.
5. INCOME TAXES
The tax character of distributions paid during the years ended August 31, 2013 and 2012, was as follows:
2013 | 2012 | |||
Distributions paid from: | ||||
Ordinary income | $ | 69,051,494 | $ | 63,649,766 |
Long term capital gain | 20,243,294 | 3,148,602 | ||
$ | 89,294,788 | $ | 66,798,368 |
At August 31, 2013, the cost of investments, net unrealized appreciation (depreciation), undistributed ordinary income and undistributed long term capital gains for income tax purposes were as follows:
Cost of investments | $ | 674,559,644 | |
Unrealized appreciation | $ | 43,799,754 | |
Unrealized depreciation | (45,240,133 | ) | |
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | $ | (1,440,379 | ) |
Undistributed ordinary income | $ | 21,487,202 | |
Undistributed long term capital gains | 5,357,076 | ||
Distributable earnings | $ | 26,844,278 |
Differences between income and/or capital gains as determined on a book basis and a tax basis are primarily due to differing treatments of foreign currency transactions and notional principal contracts.
28 | Annual Report
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
6. INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS
Purchases and sales of investments (excluding short term securities) for the year ended August 31, 2013, aggregated $104,839,011 and $101,359,467, respectively.
7. INVESTMENTS IN INSTITUTIONAL FIDUCIARY TRUST MONEY MARKET PORTFOLIO
The Fund invests in the Institutional Fiduciary Trust Money Market Portfolio (Sweep Money Fund), an open-end investment company managed by Advisers. Management fees paid by the Fund are reduced on assets invested in the Sweep Money Fund, in an amount not to exceed the management and administrative fees paid by the Sweep Money Fund.
8. CREDIT RISK AND DEFAULTED SECURITIES
At August 31, 2013, the Fund had 62.09% of its portfolio invested in high yield or other securities rated below investment grade. These securities may be more sensitive to economic conditions causing greater price volatility and are potentially subject to a greater risk of loss due to default than higher rated securities.
The Fund held a defaulted security and/or other securities for which the income has been deemed uncollectible. At August 31, 2013, the value of this security was $1,852,400, representing 0.26% of the Funds net assets. The Fund discontinues accruing income on securities for which income has been deemed uncollectible and provides an estimate for losses on interest receivable. The security has been identified on the accompanying Statement of Investments.
9. CONCENTRATION OF RISK
Investing in foreign securities may include certain risks and considerations not typically associated with investing in U.S. securities, such as fluctuating currency values and changing local and regional economic, political and social conditions, which may result in greater market volatility. In addition, certain foreign securities may not be as liquid as U.S. securities.
Annual Report | 29
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
10. OTHER DERIVATIVE INFORMATION
At August 31, 2013, the Funds investments in derivative contracts are reflected on the
Statement of Assets and Liabilities as follows:
Asset Derivatives | Liability Derivatives | ||||||||
Derivative Contracts | |||||||||
Not Accounted for as | Statement of Assets and | Fair Value | Statement of Assets and | Fair Value | |||||
Hedging Instruments | Liabilities Location | Amount | Liabilities Location | Amount | |||||
Interest rate | |||||||||
contracts | Unrealized appreciation | Unrealized depreciation | |||||||
on swap contracts | $ | | on swap contracts | $ | 595,718 | ||||
Foreign exchange | |||||||||
contracts | Unrealized appreciation on | Unrealized appreciation on | |||||||
forward exchange contracts | 8,001,115 | forward exchange contracts | 453,463 | ||||||
For the year ended August 31, 2013, the effect of derivative contracts on the Funds Statement | |||||||||
of Operations was as follows: | |||||||||
Change in | |||||||||
Unrealized | |||||||||
Appreciation | |||||||||
Derivative Contracts | Realized Gain | (Depreciation) | |||||||
Not Accounted for as | Statement of | (Loss) for the | for the | ||||||
Hedging Instruments | Operations Locations | Year | Year | ||||||
Interest rate contracts | Net realized gain (loss) from | ||||||||
swap contracts / Net change | |||||||||
in unrealized appreciation | |||||||||
(depreciation) on investments | $ | (244,044 | ) | $ | 780,702 | ||||
Foreign exchange | |||||||||
contracts | Net realized gain (loss) from foreign | ||||||||
currency transactions/Net change in | |||||||||
unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on | |||||||||
translation of other assets and liabilities | |||||||||
denominated in foreign currencies | 10,545,896 | 5,000,790 |
For the year ended August 31, 2013, the average month end market value of derivatives represented 1.32% of average month end net assets. The average month end number of open derivative contracts for the year was 40.
See Note 1(c) regarding derivative financial instruments.
30 | Annual Report
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
11. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Fund follows a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and the Funds own market assumptions (unobservable inputs). These inputs are used in determining the value of the Funds financial instruments and are summarized in the following fair value hierarchy:
The inputs or methodology used for valuing financial instruments are not an indication of the risk associated with investing in those financial instruments.
For movements between the levels within the fair value hierarchy, the Fund has adopted a policy of recognizing the transfers as of the date of the underlying event which caused the movement.
A summary of inputs used as of August 31, 2013, in valuing the Funds assets and liabilities carried at fair value, is as follows:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||
Assets: | |||||||||
Investments in Securities: | |||||||||
Foreign Government and Agency | |||||||||
Securitiesa | $ | | $ | 404,101,601 | $ | | $ | 404,101,601 | |
Quasi-Sovereign and Corporate Bondsa | | 242,343,890 | | 242,343,890 | |||||
Credit-Linked Notes | | 1,110,175 | | 1,110,175 | |||||
Short Term Investments | 12,617,116 | 12,946,483 | | 25,563,599 | |||||
Total Investments in Securities | $ | 12,617,116 | $ | 660,502,149 | $ | | $ | 673,119,265 | |
Forward Exchange Contracts | $ | | $ | 8,001,115 | $ | | $ | 8,001,115 | |
Liabilities: | |||||||||
Swap Contracts | | 595,718 | | 595,718 | |||||
Forward Exchange Contracts | | 453,463 | | 453,463 | |||||
aFor detailed categories, see the accompanying Statement of Investments. |
Annual Report | 31
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
12. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-11, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. The amendments in the ASU enhance disclosures about offsetting of financial assets and liabilities to enable investors to understand the effect of these arrangements on a funds financial position. In January 2013, FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities. The amendments in ASU No. 2013-01 clarify the intended scope of disclosures required by ASU No. 2011-11. These ASUs are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Fund believes the adoption of these ASUs will not have a material impact on its financial statements.
In June 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-08, Investment Companies (Topic 946): Amendments to the Scope, Measurement, and Disclosure Requirements. The ASU modifies the criteria used in defining an investment company under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and also sets forth certain measurement and disclosure requirements. Under the ASU, an entity that is registered under the 1940 Act automatically qualifies as an investment company. The ASU is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013. The Fund is currently reviewing the requirements and believes the adoption of this ASU will not have a material impact on its financial statements.
13. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Fund has evaluated subsequent events through the issuance of the financial statements and determined that no events have occurred that require disclosure.
ABBREVIATIONS | |||||
Counterparty | Currency | Selected Portfolio | |||
BZWS | - Barclays Bank PLC | BRL | - Brazilian Real | FRN | - Floating Rate Note |
CITI | - Citibank N.A. | DEM | - Deutsche Mark | GDP | - Gross Domestic Product |
DBAB | - Deutsche Bank AG | EUR | - Euro | ||
GSCO | - The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | GHS | - Ghanaian Cedi | ||
HSBK | - HSBC Bank PLC | IDR | - Indonesian Rupiah | ||
JPHQ | - JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. | LKR | - Sri Lankan Rupee | ||
MSCO | - Morgan Stanley and Co. Inc. | MXN | - Mexican Peso | ||
UBSW | - UBS AG | NGN | - Nigerian Naira | ||
RSD | - Serbian Dinar | ||||
UAH | - Ukraine Hryvnia |
32 | Annual Report
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Trustees and Shareholders of Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
In our opinion, the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the statement of investments, and the related statements of operations and of changes in net assets and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund (the Fund) at August 31, 2013, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as financial statements) are the responsibility of the Funds management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of securities at August 31, 2013 by correspondence with the custodian, transfer agent and brokers, provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Francisco, California
October 18, 2013
Annual Report | 33
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Tax Information (unaudited)
Under Section 852(b)(3)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code), the Fund hereby reports the maximum amount allowable but no less than $20,243,294 as a long term capital gain dividend for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2013.
At August 31, 2012, more than 50% of the Funds total assets were invested in securities of foreign issuers. In most instances, foreign taxes were withheld from income paid to the Fund on these investments. As shown in the table below, the Fund hereby reports to shareholders the foreign source income and foreign taxes paid, pursuant to Section 853 of the Code. This written statement will allow shareholders of record on September 28, 2012, to treat their proportionate share of foreign taxes paid by the Fund as having been paid directly by them. The shareholder shall consider these amounts as foreign taxes paid in the tax year in which they receive the Fund distribution.
The following table provides a detailed analysis of foreign tax paid, foreign source income, and foreign qualified dividends as reported by the Fund, to shareholders of record.
Foreign Tax Paid | Foreign Source | Foreign Qualified | ||
Per Share | Income Per Share | Dividends Per Share | ||
$ | 0.0351 | $ | 1.3694 | $ |
Foreign Tax Paid Per Share (Column 1) is the amount per share available to you, as a tax credit (assuming you held your shares in the Fund for a minimum of 16 days during the 31-day period beginning 15 days before the ex-dividend date of the Funds distribution to which the foreign taxes relate), or, as a tax deduction.
Foreign Source Income Per Share (Column 2) is the amount per share of income dividends attributable to foreign securities held by the Fund, plus any foreign taxes withheld on these dividends. The amounts reported include foreign source qualified dividends that have not been adjusted for the rate differential applicable to such dividend income.1
Foreign Qualified Dividends Per Share (Column 3) is the amount per share of foreign source quali-fied dividends, plus any foreign taxes withheld on these dividends. These amounts represent the portion of the Foreign Source Income reported to you in column 2 that were derived from quali-fied foreign securities held by the Fund.1
By mid-February 2013, shareholders received Form 1099-DIV which included their share of taxes paid and foreign source income distributed during the calendar year 2012. The Foreign Source Income reported on Form 1099-DIV has not been adjusted for the rate differential on foreign source qualified dividend income. Shareholders are advised to check with their tax advisors for information on the treatment of these amounts on their 2012 individual income tax returns.
1. Qualified dividends are taxed at reduced long term capital gains tax rates. In determining the amount of foreign tax credit that may be applied against the U.S. tax liability of individuals receiving foreign source qualified dividends, adjustments may be required to the foreign tax credit limitation calculation to reflect the rate differential applicable to such dividend income. The rules however permit certain individuals to elect not to apply the rate differential adjustments for capital gains and/or dividends for any taxable year. Please consult your tax advisor and the instructions to Form 1116 for more information.
34 | Annual Report
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Annual Meeting of Shareholders, March 1, 2013 (unaudited)
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Fund was held at the Funds offices, 300 S.E. 2nd Street, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, on March 1, 2013. The purpose of the meeting was to elect four Trustees of the Fund and to ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Fund for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2013.
At the meeting, the following persons were elected by the shareholders to serve as Trustees of the Fund: Frank J. Crothers, Frank A. Olson, Charles B. Johnson and Gregory E. Johnson.* Shareholders also ratified the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Fund for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2013. No other business was transacted at the meeting.
The results of the voting at the Annual Meeting are as follows: | ||||||||||
1. Election of four Trustees: | ||||||||||
% of | % of | |||||||||
Shares | Shares | |||||||||
% of | Present | % of | Present | |||||||
Outstanding | and | Outstanding | and | |||||||
Term Expiring 2016 | For | Shares | Voting | Withheld | Shares | Voting | ||||
Frank J. Crothers | 42,810,033 | 89.65 | % | 98.05 | % | 851,475 | 1.78 | % | 1.95 | % |
Frank A. Olson | 42,734,340 | 89.49 | % | 97.88 | % | 927,168 | 1.94 | % | 2.12 | % |
Charles B. Johnson | 42,721,822 | 89.46 | % | 97.85 | % | 939,686 | 1.97 | % | 2.15 | % |
Gregory E. Johnson | 42,781,835 | 89.59 | % | 97.99 | % | 879,673 | 1.84 | % | 2.01 | % |
There were approximately 318,026 broker non-votes and 1,125 uncast votes received with respect to this item.
2. Ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Fund for the fiscal year ending August 31, 2013:
% of | |||||
Shares | |||||
% of | Present | ||||
Shares | Outstanding | and | |||
Voted | Shares | Voting | |||
For | 43,258,963 | 90.59 | % | 98.36 | % |
Against | 321,319 | 0.67 | % | 0.73 | % |
Abstain | 400,377 | 0.84 | % | 0.91 | % |
Total | 43,980,659 | 92.10 | % | 100.00 | % |
*Harris J. Ashton, Ann Torre Bates, Edith E. Holiday, J. Michael Luttig, David W. Niemiec, Larry D. Thompson, Constantine D. Tseretopoulos and Robert E. Wade are Trustees of the Fund who are currently serving and whose terms of office continued after the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Annual Report | 35
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Dividend Reinvestment and Cash Purchase Plan
The Fund offers a Dividend Reinvestment and Cash Purchase Plan (the Plan) with the following features:
If shares of the Fund are held in the shareholders name, the shareholder will automatically be a participant in the Plan unless he elects to withdraw. If the shares are registered in the name of a broker-dealer or other nominee (i.e., in street name), the broker-dealer or nominee will elect to participate in the Plan on the shareholders behalf unless the shareholder instructs them otherwise, or unless the reinvestment service is not provided by the broker-dealer or nominee.
Participants should contact Computershare Shareowner Services, LLC, P.O. Box 43006, Providence, RI, 02940-3006, to receive the Plan brochure.
To receive dividends or distributions in cash, the shareholder must notify Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (formerly, The Bank of New York Mellon) (the Plan Administrator) at the address above or the institution in whose name the shares are held. The Plan Administrator must receive written notice ten business days before the record date for the distribution.
Whenever the Fund declares dividends in either cash or shares of the Fund, if the market price is equal to or exceeds net asset value at the valuation date, the participant will receive the dividends entirely in new shares at a price equal to the net asset value, but not less than 95% of the then current market price of the Funds shares. If the market price is lower than net asset value or if dividends and/or capital gains distributions are payable only in cash, the participant will receive shares purchased on the New York Stock Exchange or otherwise on the open market.
A participant has the option of submitting additional cash payments to the Plan Administrator, in any amounts of at least $100, up to a maximum of $5,000 per month, for the purchase of Fund shares for his or her account. These payments can be made by check payable to Computershare Trust Company, N.A. and sent to Computershare Shareowner Services, LLC, P.O. Box 43006, Providence, RI, 02940-3006, Attention: Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund. The Plan Administrator will apply such payments (less a $5.00 service charge and less a pro rata share of trading fees) to purchases of the Funds shares on the open market.
The automatic reinvestment of dividends and/or capital gains does not relieve the participant of any income tax that may be payable on dividends or distributions.
Whenever shares are purchased on the New York Stock Exchange or otherwise on the open market, each participant will pay a pro rata portion of trading fees. Trading fees will be deducted from amounts to be invested. The Plan Administrators fee for a sale of shares through the Plan is $15.00 per transaction plus a $0.12 per share trading fee.
36 | Annual Report
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Dividend Reinvestment and Cash Purchase Plan (continued)
A participant may withdraw from the Plan without penalty at any time by written notice to the Plan Administrator sent to Computershare Shareowner Services, LLC, P. O. Box 43006, Providence, RI, 02940-3006. Upon withdrawal, the participant will receive, without charge, share certificates issued in the participants name for all full shares held by the Plan Administrator; or, if the participant wishes, the Plan Administrator will sell the shares and send the proceeds to the participant, less a service charge of $15.00 and less trading fees of $0.12 per share. The Plan Administrator will convert any fractional shares held at the time of withdrawal to cash at current market price and send a check to the participant for the net proceeds.
Direct Deposit Service for Registered Shareholders
Cash distributions can now be electronically credited to a checking or savings account at any financial institution that participates in the Automated Clearing House (ACH) system. The Direct Deposit service is provided for registered shareholders at no charge. To enroll in the service, access your account online by going to www.computershare.com/investor or dial (800) 416-5585 (toll free) and follow the instructions. Direct Deposit will begin with the next scheduled distribution payment date following enrollment in the service.
Annual Report | 37
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Transfer Agent
Computershare Shareowner Services, LLC
P.O. Box 43006
Providence, RI 02940-3006
Overnight Address:
250 Royall Street
Canton, MA 02021
(800) 416-5585
www.computershare.com/investor
Direct Registration
If you are a registered shareholder of the Fund, purchases of shares of the Fund can be electronically credited to your Fund account at Computershare Shareowner Services, LLC through Direct Registration. This service provides shareholders with a convenient way to keep track of shares through book entry transactions, electronically move book-entry shares between broker-dealers, transfer agents and DRS eligible issuers, and eliminate the possibility of lost certificates.
For additional information, please contact Computershare Shareowner Services, LLC at (800) 416-5585.
Shareholder Information
Shares of Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol TEI. Information about the net asset value and the market price is published each Monday in the Wall Street Journal, weekly in Barrons and each Saturday in The New York Times and other newspapers. Daily market prices for the Funds shares are published in the New York Stock Exchange Composite Transactions section of newspapers.
For current information about dividends and shareholder accounts, call (800) 416-5585. Registered shareholders can access their Fund account on-line with the Investor ServiceDirect website. For information go to Computershare Shareowner Services, LLCs web site at www.computershare.com/investor and follow the instructions.
The daily closing net asset value as of the previous business day may be obtained when available by calling Franklin Templeton Fund Information after 7 a.m. Pacific time any business day at (800) DIAL BEN/342-5236. The Funds net asset value and dividends are also listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc.s Mutual Fund Quotation Service (NASDAQ MFQS).
Shareholders not receiving copies of reports to shareholders because their shares are registered in the name of a broker or a custodian can request that they be added to the Funds mailing list, by writing Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund, 100 Fountain Parkway, P.O. Box 33030, St. Petersburg, FL 33733-8030.
38 | Annual Report
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Board Members and Officers
The name, year of birth and address of the officers and board members, as well as their affiliations, positions held with the Fund, principal occupations during the at least the past five years and number of U.S. registered portfolios overseen in the Franklin Templeton Investments fund complex are shown below. Generally, each board member serves a three-year term that continues until that persons successor is elected and qualified.
Independent Board Members | ||||
Number of Portfolios in | ||||
Name, Year of Birth | Length of | Fund Complex Overseen | Other Directorships Held | |
and Address | Position | Time Served | by Board Member* | During at Least the Past 5 Years |
Harris J. Ashton (1932) | Trustee | Since 1993 | 141 | Bar-S Foods (meat packing |
300 S.E. 2nd Street | company) (1981-2010). | |||
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-1923 | ||||
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: | ||||
Director of various companies; and formerly, Director, RBC Holdings, Inc. (bank holding company) (until 2002); and President, Chief | ||||
Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, General Host Corporation (nursery and craft centers) (until 1998). | ||||
Ann Torre Bates (1958) | Trustee | Since 2008 | 38 | SLM Corporation (Sallie Mae), Ares |
300 S.E. 2nd Street | Capital Corporation (specialty finance | |||
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-1923 | company) and Allied Capital Corporation | |||
(financial services) (2003-2010). | ||||
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: | ||||
Independent strategic and financial consultant; and formerly, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, NHP Incorporated | ||||
(manager of multifamily housing) (1995-1997); and Vice President and Treasurer, US Airways, Inc. (until 1995). | ||||
Frank J. Crothers (1944) | Trustee | Since 1999 | 27 | Talon Metals Corp. (mining explo- |
300 S.E. 2nd Street | ration), Fortis, Inc. (utility holding | |||
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-1923 | company) and AML Foods Limited | |||
(retail distributors). | ||||
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: | ||||
Director and Vice Chairman, Caribbean Utilities Company, Ltd.; director of various other private business and nonprofit organizations; and | ||||
formerly, Chairman, Atlantic Equipment and Power Ltd. (1977-2003). | ||||
Edith E. Holiday (1952) | Lead | Trustee | 141 | Hess Corporation (exploration and |
300 S.E. 2nd Street | Independent | since 1996 | refining of oil and gas), H.J. Heinz | |
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-1923 | Trustee | and Lead | Company (processed foods and | |
Independent | allied products) (1994-2013), RTI | |||
Trustee | International Metals, Inc. (manufacture | |||
since 2007 | and distribution of titanium), Canadian | |||
National Railway (railroad) and White | ||||
Mountains Insurance Group, Ltd. | ||||
(holding company). | ||||
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: | ||||
Director or Trustee of various companies and trusts; and formerly, Assistant to the President of the United States and Secretary of the | ||||
Cabinet (1990-1993); General Counsel to the United States Treasury Department (1989-1990); and Counselor to the Secretary and Assistant | ||||
Secretary for Public Affairs and Public Liaison United States Treasury Department (1988-1989). |
Annual Report | 39
Number of Portfolios in | ||||
Name, Year of Birth | Length of | Fund Complex Overseen | Other Directorships Held | |
and Address | Position | Time Served | by Board Member* | During at Least the Past 5 Years |
J. Michael Luttig (1954) | Trustee | Since 2009 | 141 | Boeing Capital Corporation (aircraft |
300 S.E. 2nd Street | financing) (2006-2013). | |||
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-1923 | ||||
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: | ||||
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and member of Executive Council, The Boeing Company (aerospace company); and formerly, | ||||
Federal Appeals Court Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (1991-2006). | ||||
David W. Niemiec (1949) | Trustee | Since 2005 | 34 | Emeritus Corporation (assisted living) |
300 S.E. 2nd Street | (1999-2010) and OSI Pharmaceuticals, | |||
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-1923 | Inc. (pharmaceutical products) | |||
(2006-2010). | ||||
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: | ||||
Advisor, Saratoga Partners (private equity fund); and formerly, Managing Director, Saratoga Partners (1998-2001) and SBC Warburg Dillon | ||||
Read (investment banking) (1997-1998); Vice Chairman, Dillon, Read & Co. Inc. (investment banking) (1991-1997); and Chief Financial | ||||
Officer, Dillon, Read & Co. Inc. (1982-1997). | ||||
Frank A. Olson (1932) | Trustee | Since 2003 | 141 | Hess Corporation (exploration and |
300 S.E. 2nd Street | refining of oil and gas) (1998-2013). | |||
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-1923 | ||||
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: | ||||
Chairman Emeritus, The Hertz Corporation (car rental) (since 2000) (Chairman of the Board (1980-2000) and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
(1977-1999)); and formerly, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer, UAL Corporation (airlines) (until 1987). | ||||
Larry D. Thompson (1945) | Trustee | Since 2005 | 141 | Cbeyond, Inc. (business communica- |
300 S.E. 2nd Street | tions provider) (2010-2012), The | |||
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-1923 | Southern Company (energy company) | |||
(2010-2012) and The Washington | ||||
Post Company (education and media | ||||
organization). | ||||
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: | ||||
Executive Vice President Government Affairs, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, PepsiCo, Inc. (consumer products) (July 2012); and | ||||
formerly, John A. Sibley Professor of Corporate and Business Law, University of Georgia School of Law (2011-2012); Senior Vice President | ||||
Government Affairs, General Counsel and Secretary, PepsiCo, Inc. (2004-2011); Senior Fellow of The Brookings Institution (2003-2004); Visiting | ||||
Professor, University of Georgia School of Law (2004); and Deputy Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice (2001-2003). | ||||
Constantine D. Tseretopoulos | Trustee | Since 1999 | 27 | None |
(1954) | ||||
300 S.E. 2nd Street | ||||
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-1923 | ||||
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: | ||||
Physician, Chief of Staff, owner and operator of the Lyford Cay Hospital (1987-present); director of various nonprofit organizations; and formerly, | ||||
Cardiology Fellow, University of Maryland (1985-1987); and Internal Medicine Resident, Greater Baltimore Medical Center (1982-1985). | ||||
Robert E. Wade (1946) | Trustee | Since 2006 | 45 | El Oro Ltd (investments). |
300 S.E. 2nd Street | ||||
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-1923 | ||||
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: | ||||
Attorney at law engaged in private practice (1972-2008) and member of various boards. |
40 | Annual Report
Interested Board Members and Officers | ||||
Number of Portfolios in | ||||
Name, Year of Birth | Length of | Fund Complex Overseen | Other Directorships Held | |
and Address | Position | Time Served | by Board Member* | During at Least the Past 5 Years |
**Gregory E. Johnson (1961) | Trustee | Since 2007 | 152 | None |
One Franklin Parkway | ||||
San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 | ||||
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: | ||||
Chairman of the Board, Member Office of the Chairman, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer, Franklin Resources, Inc.; officer | ||||
and/or director or trustee, as the case may be, of some of the other subsidiaries of Franklin Resources, Inc. and of 44 of the investment | ||||
companies in Franklin Templeton Investments; and Chairman, Investment Company Institute. | ||||
**Rupert H. Johnson, Jr. (1940) | Chairman of | Chairman of the | 141 | None |
One Franklin Parkway | the Board and | Board and Trustee | ||
San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 | Trustee and | since June 2013, | ||
Vice President | and Vice President | |||
since 1996 | ||||
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: | ||||
Vice Chairman, Member - Office of the Chairman and Director, Franklin Resources, Inc.; Director, Franklin Advisers, Inc.; Senior Vice | ||||
President, Franklin Advisory Services, LLC; and officer and/or director or trustee, as the case may be, of some of the other subsidiaries of | ||||
Franklin Resources, Inc. and of 41 of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton Investments. | ||||
Alison E. Baur (1964) | Vice President | Since 2012 | Not Applicable | Not Applicable |
One Franklin Parkway | ||||
San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 | ||||
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: | ||||
Deputy General Counsel, Franklin Templeton Investments; and officer of some of the other subsidiaries of Franklin Resources, Inc. and of 46 | ||||
of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton Investments. | ||||
Laura F. Fergerson (1962) | Chief Executive | Since 2009 | Not Applicable | Not Applicable |
One Franklin Parkway | Officer | |||
San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 | Finance and | |||
Administration | ||||
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: | ||||
Senior Vice President, Franklin Templeton Services, LLC; and officer of 46 of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton Investments. | ||||
Aliya S. Gordon (1973) | Vice President | Since 2009 | Not Applicable | Not Applicable |
One Franklin Parkway | ||||
San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 | ||||
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: | ||||
Senior Associate General Counsel, Franklin Templeton Investments; officer of 46 of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton | ||||
Investments; and formerly, Litigation Associate, Steefel, Levitt & Weiss, LLP (2000-2004). | ||||
Steven J. Gray (1955) | Vice President | Since 2009 | Not Applicable | Not Applicable |
One Franklin Parkway | ||||
San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 | ||||
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: | ||||
Senior Associate General Counsel, Franklin Templeton Investments; Vice President, Franklin Templeton Distributors, Inc.; and officer of 46 of | ||||
the investment companies in Franklin Templeton Investments. |
Annual Report | 41
Number of Portfolios in | ||||
Name, Year of Birth | Length of | Fund Complex Overseen | Other Directorships Held | |
and Address | Position | Time Served | by Board Member* | During at Least the Past 5 Years |
Selena L. Holmes (1965) | Vice President | Not Applicable | Not Applicable | |
100 Fountain Parkway | AML | |||
St. Petersburg, FL 33716-1205 | Compliance | |||
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: | ||||
Director, Global Compliance Monitoring; and officer of 46 of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton Investments. | ||||
Christopher J. Molumphy (1962) | President and | Since 2002 | Not Applicable | Not Applicable |
One Franklin Parkway | Chief Executive | |||
San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 | Officer | |||
Investment | ||||
Management | ||||
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: | ||||
Director and Executive Vice President, Franklin Advisers, Inc.; Executive Vice President, Franklin Templeton Institutional, LLC; and officer of | ||||
some of the other subsidiaries of Franklin Resources, Inc. and of 22 of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton Investments. | ||||
Kimberly H. Novotny (1972) | Vice President | Since March 2013 | Not Applicable | Not Applicable |
300 S.E. 2nd Street | ||||
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-1923 | ||||
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: | ||||
Senior Corporate Counsel, Franklin Templeton Investments; Vice President, Secretary and Trust Officer, Fiduciary Trust International of the | ||||
South; Vice President, Templeton Investment Counsel, LLC; Assistant Secretary, Franklin Resources, Inc.; and officer of 46 of the investment | ||||
companies in Franklin Templeton Investments. | ||||
Mark H. Otani (1968) | Treasurer, | Since 2009 | Not Applicable | Not Applicable |
One Franklin Parkway | Chief Financial | |||
San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 | Officer and | |||
Chief | ||||
Accounting | ||||
Officer | ||||
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: | ||||
Director, Global Fund Accounting Operations, Franklin Templeton Investments; and officer of 14 of the investment companies in Franklin | ||||
Templeton Investments. | ||||
Robert C. Rosselot (1960) | Chief | Since March 2013 | Not Applicable | Not Applicable |
300 S.E. 2nd Street | Compliance | |||
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-1923 | Officer | |||
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: | ||||
Director, Global Compliance, Franklin Templeton Investments; officer of 46 of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton Investments; | ||||
and formerly, Senior Associate General Counsel, Franklin Templeton Investments (2007-2013); and Secretary and Vice President, Templeton | ||||
Group of Funds (2004-2013). | ||||
Karen L. Skidmore (1952) | Vice President | Since 2009 | Not Applicable | Not Applicable |
One Franklin Parkway | ||||
San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 | ||||
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: | ||||
Senior Associate General Counsel, Franklin Templeton Investments; and officer of 46 of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton | ||||
Investments. |
42 | Annual Report
Number of Portfolios in | ||||
Name, Year of Birth | Length of | Fund Complex Overseen | Other Directorships Held | |
and Address | Position | Time Served | by Board Member* | During at Least the Past 5 Years |
Craig S. Tyle (1960) | Vice President | Since 2005 | Not Applicable | Not Applicable |
One Franklin Parkway | ||||
San Mateo, CA 94403-1906 | ||||
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: | ||||
General Counsel and Executive Vice President, Franklin Resources, Inc.; officer of some of the other subsidiaries of Franklin Resources, Inc. | ||||
and of 46 of the investment companies in Franklin Templeton Investments; and formerly, Partner, Shearman & Sterling, LLP (2004-2005); | ||||
and General Counsel, Investment Company Institute (ICI) (1997-2004). | ||||
Lori A. Weber (1964) | Secretary and | Secretary since | Not Applicable | Not Applicable |
300 S.E. 2nd Street | Vice President | March 2013 and | ||
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-1923 | Vice President | |||
since 2011 | ||||
Principal Occupation During at Least the Past 5 Years: | ||||
Senior Associate General Counsel, Franklin Templeton Investments; Assistant Secretary, Franklin Resources, Inc.; Vice President and | ||||
Secretary, Templeton Investment Counsel, LLC; Vice President, Fiduciary Trust International of the South; and officer of 46 of the investment | ||||
companies in Franklin Templeton Investments. |
*We base the number of portfolios on each separate series of the U.S. registered investment companies within the Franklin Templeton Investments fund complex. These portfolios
have a common investment manager or affiliated investment managers.
** Gregory E. Johnson is considered to be an interested person of the Fund under the federal securities laws due to his position as an officer and director of Franklin Resources, Inc.
(Resources), which is the parent company of the Funds investment manager. Rupert H. Johnson, Jr. is considered to be an interested person of the Fund under the federal securities
laws due to his position as officer and director and major shareholder of Resources.
Note 1: Rupert H. Johnson, Jr. is the uncle of Gregory E. Johnson.
Note 2: Officer information is current as of the date of this report. It is possible that after this date, information about officers may change.
Note 3: Effective June 13, 2013, Charles B. Johnson ceased to be a trustee of the Fund.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Rules adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission require the Fund to disclose whether the Funds Audit Committee
includes at least one member who is an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of such Act and Rules. The Funds Board has determined that there is at least
one such financial expert on the Audit Committee and has designated each of Ann Torre Bates and David W. Niemiec as an audit committee financial expert. The Board
believes that Ms. Bates and Mr. Niemiec qualify as such an expert in view of their extensive business background and experience. Ms. Bates has served as a member of the
Fund Audit Committee since 2008. She currently serves as a director of SLM Corporation and Ares Capital Corporation and was formerly a director of Allied Capital
Corporation from 2003 to 2010, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of NHP Incorporated and Vice President and Treasurer of US Airways, Inc. Mr. Niemiec
has served as a member of the Fund Audit Committee since 2005, currently serves as an Advisor to Saratoga Partners and was formerly its Managing Director from 1998 to
2001. Mr. Niemiec was formerly a director of Emeritus Corporation from 1999 to 2010 and OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. from 2006 to 2010, Managing Director of SBC Warburg
Dillon Read from 1997 to 1998, and was Vice Chairman from 1991 to 1997 and Chief Financial Officer from 1982 to 1997 of Dillon, Read & Co. Inc. As a result of such back-
ground and experience, the Board believes that Ms. Bates and Mr. Niemiec have each acquired an understanding of generally accepted accounting principles and financial
statements, the general application of such principles in connection with the accounting estimates, accruals and reserves, and analyzing and evaluating financial state-
ments that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues generally comparable to those of the Fund, as well as an understanding of internal controls and
procedures for financial reporting and an understanding of audit committee functions. Ms. Bates and Mr. Niemiec are independent Board members as that term is defined
under the applicable U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Rules and Releases or the listing standards applicable to the Fund.
Annual Report | 43
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Shareholder Information
Board Review of Investment Management Agreement
At a meeting held May 21, 2013, the Board of Trustees (Board), including a majority of non-interested or independent Trustees, approved renewal of the investment management agreement for the Fund. In reaching this decision, the Board took into account information furnished throughout the year at regular Board meetings, as well as information prepared specifically in connection with the annual renewal review process. Information furnished and discussed throughout the year included investment performance reports on the Fund, information on its share price discount to net asset value, and other related financial information, as well as periodic reports on expenses, legal and compliance matters, pricing, brokerage commissions and execution and other services provided by the Investment Manager (Manager) and its affiliates. Information furnished specifically in connection with the renewal process included a report prepared by Lipper, Inc. (Lipper), an independent organization, as well as additional material, including a Fund profitability analysis prepared by management. The Lipper reports compared the Funds investment performance and expenses with those of other mutual funds deemed comparable to the Fund as selected by Lipper. The Fund profitability analysis discussed the profitability to Franklin Templeton Investments from its overall U.S. fund operations, as well as on an individual fund-by-fund basis. Additional material accompanying such profitability analysis included information on a fund-by-fund basis listing portfolio managers and other accounts they manage, as well as information on management fees charged by the Manager and its affiliates to U.S. mutual funds and other accounts, including managements explanation of differences where relevant. Such material also included a memorandum prepared by management describing project initiatives and capital investments relating to the services provided to the Fund by the Franklin Templeton Investments organization, as well as a memorandum relating to economies of scale.
In considering such materials, the independent Trustees received assistance and advice from and met separately with independent counsel. In approving continuance of the investment management agreement for the Fund, the Board, including a majority of independent Trustees, determined that the existing management fee structure was fair and reasonable and that continuance of the investment management agreement was in the best interests of the Fund and its shareholders. While attention was given to all information furnished, the following discusses some primary factors relevant to the Boards decision.
NATURE, EXTENT AND QUALITY OF SERVICE. The Board was satisfied with the nature and quality of the overall services provided by the Manager and its affiliates to the Fund and its shareholders. In addition to investment performance and expenses discussed later, the Boards opinion was based, in part, upon periodic reports furnished it showing that the investment policies and restrictions for the Fund were consistently complied with as well as other reports periodically furnished the Board covering matters such as the compliance of portfolio managers and other management personnel with the code of ethics adopted throughout the Franklin Templeton fund complex, the adherence to fair value pricing procedures established by the Board, and the accuracy of net asset value calculations. Favorable consideration was given to managements continuous
44 | Annual Report
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Shareholder Information (continued)
Board Review of Investment Management Agreement (continued)
efforts and expenditures in establishing back-up systems and recovery procedures to function in the event of a natural disaster, it being noted that such systems and procedures had functioned well during the Florida hurricanes and blackouts experienced in previous years, and that those operations in the New York/New Jersey area ran smoothly during the more recent Hurricane Sandy. Consideration was also given to the experience of the Funds portfolio management team, the number of accounts managed and general method of compensation. In this latter respect, the Board noted that a primary factor in managements determination of the level of a portfolio managers bonus compensation was the relative investment performance of the funds he or she managed and that a portion of such bonus was required to be invested in a predesignated list of funds within such persons fund management area so as to be aligned with the interests of shareholders. Particular attention was given to managements conservative approach and diligent risk management procedures, including continuous monitoring of counterparty credit risk and attention given to derivatives and other complex instruments included expanded collateralization requirements. The Board also took into account, among other things, the strong financial position of the Managers parent company and its commitment to the mutual fund business as evidenced by its subsidization of money market funds.
INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE. The Board placed significant emphasis on the investment performance of the Fund in view of its importance to shareholders. While consideration was given to performance reports and discussions with portfolio managers at Board meetings during the year, particular attention in assessing performance was given to the Lipper reports furnished for the agreement renewal. The Lipper report for the Fund showed its investment performance for the one-year period ended February 28, 2013, as well as the previous 10 years ended that date in respect to a performance universe consisting of the Fund and all other closed-end nonleveraged emerging market debt funds as selected by Lipper. Such report considered the Funds income return and total return on a net asset value basis without regard to market discounts or premiums to accurately reflect investment performance. The Lipper report showed the Funds income return to be the highest among the six funds composing its Lipper performance universe for the one-year period, and for the previous three- and five-year periods on an annualized basis and to be the second highest of the five funds constituting such universe for the previous annualized 10-year period. The Lipper report showed the Funds total return to also be the highest in such universe for the one-year period, and the previous three- and five-year periods on an annualized basis, and to be the second highest of the five funds constituting such universe for the previous annualized 10-year period. The Board was satisfied with such comparative investment performance.
COMPARATIVE EXPENSES. Consideration was given to a comparative analysis of the management fee and total expense ratio of the Fund within a group of five funds, including the Fund, selected by Lipper as constituting its appropriate Lipper expense group. Lipper expense data is based upon information taken from each funds most recent annual report, which reflects historical asset levels that may be quite different from those currently existing, particularly in a
Annual Report | 45
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Shareholder Information (continued)
Board Review of Investment Management Agreement (continued)
period of market volatility. While recognizing such inherent limitation and the fact that expense ratios generally increase as assets decline and decrease as assets grow, the Board believed the independent analysis conducted by Lipper to be an appropriate measure of comparative expenses. In reviewing comparative costs, Lipper provides information on the Funds contractual investment management fee in comparison with the effective management fee that would have been charged by the other funds within the Lipper expense group assuming they were similar in size to the Fund, as well as the actual total expenses of the Fund in comparison with those of the other funds. The Lipper contractual investment management fee analysis considers administrative fees to be part of management fees and the results of such expense comparison showed the Funds contractual investment management fee rate to be the second lowest in its Lipper expense group and the Funds actual total expense ratio to be at the Lipper expense group median. The Board was satis-fied with the Funds expenses in comparison to those of its Lipper expense group.
MANAGEMENT PROFITABILITY. The Board also considered the level of profits realized by the Manager and its affiliates in connection with the operation of the Fund. In this respect, the Board reviewed the Fund profitability analysis that addresses the overall profitability of Franklin Templetons U.S. fund business, as well as its profits in providing management and other services to each of the individual funds during the 12-month period ended September 30, 2012, being the most recent fiscal year-end for Franklin Resources, Inc., the Managers parent. In reviewing the analysis, attention was given to the methodology followed in allocating costs to the Fund, it being recognized that allocation methodologies are inherently subjective and various allocation methodologies may each be reasonable while producing different results. In this respect, the Board noted that, while being continuously refined and reflecting changes in the Managers own cost accounting, the allocation methodology was consistent with that followed in profitability report presentations made in prior years and that the Funds independent registered public accounting firm had been engaged by the Manager to periodically review the reasonableness of the allocation methodologies solely for use by the Funds Board in reference to the profitability analysis. In reviewing and discussing such analysis, management discussed with the Board its belief that costs incurred in establishing the infrastructure necessary for the type of mutual fund operations conducted by the Manager and its affiliates may not be fully reflected in the expenses allocated to each Fund in determining its profitability, as well as the fact that the level of profits, to a certain extent, reflected operational cost savings and efficiencies initiated by management. In addition, the Board considered a third-party study comparing the profitability of the Managers parent on an overall basis to other publicly held managers broken down to show profitability from management operations exclusive of distribution expenses, as well as profitability including distribution expenses. The Board also considered the extent to which the Manager and its affiliates might derive ancillary benefits from fund operations. Based upon its consideration of all these factors, the Board determined that the level of profits realized by the Manager and its affiliates from providing services to the Fund was not excessive in view of the nature, quality and extent of services provided.
46 | Annual Report
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Shareholder Information (continued)
Board Review of Investment Management Agreement (continued)
ECONOMIES OF SCALE. The Board also considered whether the Manager realizes economies of scale as the Fund grows larger and the extent to which any such benefit is shared with the Fund and its shareholders. The Board believed that a managers ability to realize economies of scale and the sharing of such benefit is a more relevant consideration in the case of an open-end fund whose size increases as a result of the continuous sale of its shares. A closed-end investment company such as the Fund does not continuously offer shares, and growth following its initial public offering will primarily result from market appreciation, which benefits its shareholders. The Funds investment advisory fee provides a rate of 0.85% on the first $1 billion of net assets, with breakpoints thereafter, and the Fund also pays a flat 0.15% fee at all asset levels for administrative services. At the end of 2012, the Funds net assets amounted to approximately $757 million, While believing economies of scale to be less of a factor in the context of a closed-end fund, the Board believes at some point an increase in size may lead to economies of scale that should be shared with the Fund and its shareholders and intends to monitor future growth of the Fund accordingly, noting the management fee breakpoints at the $1 billion net asset level.
In addition to the investment advisory services provided the Fund under its investment management agreement, administrative services are provided under a separate agreement at a fixed charge of 15 basis points as mentioned above. At the May 21, 2013, Board meeting, the Board eliminated the separate agreements and approved a new form of investment management agreement for the Fund combining such services. In approving the new form of investment management agreements, the Board took into account the fact that the types of services and aggregate fee, including breakpoints, would be the same as provided under the previous separate agreements and that combining such services was consistent with Lippers methodology of considering contractual investment management fees to include any separately charged administrative fee.
Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures
The Funds investment manager has established Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures (Policies) that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities. Shareholders may view the Funds complete Policies online at franklintempleton.com. Alternatively, shareholders may request copies of the Policies free of charge by calling the Proxy Group collect at (954) 527-7678 or by sending a written request to: Franklin Templeton Companies, LLC, 300 S.E. 2nd Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301, Attention: Proxy Group. Copies of the Funds proxy voting records are also made available online at franklintempleton.com and posted on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commissions website at sec.gov and reflect the most recent 12-month period ended June 30.
Annual Report | 47
Templeton Emerging Markets Income Fund
Shareholder Information (continued)
Quarterly Statement of Investments
The Fund files a complete statement of investments with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for the first and third quarters for each fiscal year on Form N-Q. Shareholders may view the filed Form N-Q by visiting the Commissions website at sec.gov. The filed form may also be viewed and copied at the Commissions Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information regarding the operations of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling (800) SEC-0330.
Certifications
The Funds Chief Executive Officer Finance and Administration is required by the New York Stock Exchanges Listing Standards to file annually with the Exchange a certification that she is not aware of any violation by the Fund of the Exchanges Corporate Governance Standards applicable to the Fund. The Fund has filed such certification.
In addition, the Funds Chief Executive Officer Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer are required by the rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to provide certain certifications with respect to the Funds Form N-CSR and Form N-CSRS (which include the Funds annual and semiannual reports to shareholders) that are filed annually with the Commission. The Fund has filed such certifications with its Form N-CSRS for the six months ended February 28, 2013. Additionally, the Fund expects to file, on or about October 30, 2013, such certifications with its Form N-CSR for the year ended August 31, 2013.
48 | Annual Report
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
(a) | The Registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to its principal executive officers and principal financial and accounting officer. |
(c) | N/A |
(d) | N/A |
(f) | Pursuant to Item 12(a)(1), the Registrant is attaching as an exhibit a copy of its code of ethics that applies to its principal executive officers and principal financial and accounting officer. |
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
(a)(1) The Registrant has an audit committee financial expert serving on its audit committee.
(2) The audit committee financial expert is David W. Niemiec and he is "independent" as defined under the relevant Securities and Exchange Commission Rules and Releases.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
(a) Audit Fees
The aggregate fees paid to the principal accountant for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of the registrants annual financial statements or for services that are normally provided by the principal accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements were $48,187 for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2013 and $49,110 for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2012.
(b) Audit-Related Fees
There were no fees paid to the principal accountant for assurance and related services rendered by the principal accountant to the registrant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the registrant's financial statements and are not reported under paragraph (a) of Item 4.
There were no fees paid to the principal accountant for assurance and related services rendered by the principal accountant to the registrant's investment adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of their financial statements.
(c) Tax Fees
There were no fees paid to the principal accountant for professional services rendered by the principal accountant to the registrant for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.
The aggregate fees paid to the principal accountant for professional services rendered by the principal accountant to the registrants investment adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the
investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning were $6,100 for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2013 and $54,600 for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2012. The services for which these fees were paid included technical tax consultation for capital gain tax reporting to foreign governments, application of local country tax laws to investments and licensing securities with local country offices.
(d) All Other Fees
The aggregate fees paid to the principal accountant for products and services rendered by the principal accountant to the registrant, other than the services reported in paragraphs (a)-(c) of Item 4 were $0 for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2013 and $267 for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2012. The services for which these fees were paid included review of materials provided to the fund Board in connection with the investment management contract renewal process.
The aggregate fees paid to the principal accountant for products and services rendered by the principal accountant to the registrants investment adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant, other than the services reported in paragraphs (a)-(c) of Item 4 were $0 for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2013 and $152,183 for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2012. The services for which these fees were paid included review of materials provided to the fund Board in connection with the investment management contract renewal process.
(e) (1) The registrants audit committee is directly responsible for approving the services to be provided by the auditors, including:
(i) | pre-approval of all audit and audit related services; |
(ii) | pre-approval of all non-audit related services to be provided to |
the Fund by the auditors;
(iii) pre-approval of all non-audit related services to be provided to the registrant by the auditors to the registrants investment adviser or to any entity that controls, is controlled by or is under common control with the registrants investment adviser and that provides ongoing services to the registrant where the non-audit services relate directly to the operations or financial reporting of the registrant; and (iv) establishment by the audit committee, if deemed necessary or appropriate, as an alternative to committee pre-approval of services to be provided by the auditors, as required by paragraphs (ii) and (iii) above, of policies and procedures to permit such services to be pre-approved by other means, such as through establishment of guidelines or by action of a designated member or members of the committee; provided the policies and procedures are detailed as to the particular service and the committee is informed of each service and such policies and procedures do not include delegation of audit committee responsibilities, as contemplated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, to management; subject, in the case of (ii) through (iv), to any waivers, exceptions or exemptions that may be available under applicable law or rules.
(e) | (2) None of the services provided to the registrant described in paragraphs |
(b) | -(d) of Item 4 were approved by the audit committee pursuant to paragraph |
(c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of regulation S-X.
(f) No disclosures are required by this Item 4(f).
(g) The aggregate non-audit fees paid to the principal accountant for services rendered by the principal accountant to the registrant and the registrants investment adviser and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant were $6,100 for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2013 and $207,050 for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2012.
(h) The registrants audit committee of the board has considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to the registrants investment adviser (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were not pre-approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X is compatible with maintaining the principal accountants independence.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
Members of the Audit Committee are: Ann Torre Bates, Frank J. Crothers, David W. Niemiec and Constantine D. Tseretopoulos.
Item 6. Schedule of Investments. N/A
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
The board of trustees of the Fund has delegated the authority to vote proxies related to the portfolio securities held by the Fund to the Fund's investment manager Franklin Advisers, Inc. in accordance with the Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures (Policies) adopted by the investment manager.
The investment manager has delegated its administrative duties with respect to the voting of proxies to the Proxy Group within Franklin Templeton Companies, LLC (Proxy Group), an affiliate and wholly owned subsidiary of Franklin Resources, Inc. All proxies received by the Proxy Group will be voted based upon the investment managers instructions and/or policies. The investment manager votes proxies solely in the best interests of the Fund and its shareholders.
To assist it in analyzing proxies, the investment manager subscribes to Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc. (ISS), an unaffiliated third-party corporate governance research service that provides in-depth analyses of shareholder meeting agendas, vote recommendations, vote execution services, ballot reconciliation services, recordkeeping and vote disclosure services. In addition, the investment manager subscribes to Glass, Lewis & Co., LLC (Glass Lewis), an unaffiliated third-party analytical research firm, to receive analyses and vote recommendations on the shareholder meetings of publicly held U.S. companies, as well as a limited subscription to its international research. Although ISS and/or Glass Lewis analyses are thoroughly reviewed and considered in making a final voting decision, the investment manager does
not consider recommendations from ISS, Glass Lewis or any other third party to be determinative of the investment managers ultimate decision. As a matter of policy, the officers, directors/trustees and employees of the investment manager and the Proxy Group will not be influenced by outside sources whose interests conflict with the interests of the Fund and its shareholders. Efforts are made to resolve all conflicts in the best interests of the investment managers clients. Material conflicts of interest are identified by the Proxy Group based upon analyses of client, distributor, broker-dealer and vendor lists, information periodically gathered from directors and officers, and information derived from other sources, including public filings. In situations where a material conflict of interest is identified, the Proxy Group may defer to the voting recommendation of ISS, Glass Lewis or those of another independent third-party provider of proxy services; or send the proxy directly to the Fund's board or a committee of the board with the investment manager's recommendation regarding the vote for approval.
Where a material conflict of interest has been identified, but the items on which the investment managers vote recommendations differ from Glass Lewis, ISS, or another independent third-party provider of proxy services relate specifically to (1) shareholder proposals regarding social or environmental issues, (2) Other Business without describing the matters that might be considered, or (3) items the investment manager wishes to vote in opposition to the recommendations of an issuers management, the Proxy Group may defer to the vote recommendations of the investment manager rather than sending the proxy directly to the Fund's board or a board committee for approval.
To avoid certain potential conflicts of interest, the investment manager will employ echo voting, if possible, in the following instances: (1) when the Fund invests in an underlying fund in reliance on any one of Sections 12(d) (1) (E), (F), or (G) of the 1940 Act, the rules thereunder, or pursuant to a SEC exemptive order thereunder; (2) when the Fund invests uninvested cash in affiliated money market funds pursuant to the rules under the 1940 Act or any exemptive orders thereunder (cash sweep arrangement); or (3) when required pursuant to the Funds governing documents or applicable law. Echo voting means that the investment manager will vote the shares in the same proportion as the vote of all of the other holders of the Funds shares.
The recommendation of management on any issue is a factor that the investment manager considers in determining how proxies should be voted. However, the investment manager does not consider recommendations from management to be determinative of the investment managers ultimate decision. As a matter of practice, the votes with respect to most issues are cast in accordance with the position of the company's management. Each issue, however, is considered on its own merits, and the investment manager will not support the position of the company's management in any situation where it deems that the ratification of managements position would adversely affect the investment merits of owning that companys shares.
Investment managers proxy voting policies and principles The investment manager has adopted general proxy voting guidelines, which are summarized below. These guidelines are not an exhaustive list of all the issues that may arise and the investment manager cannot anticipate all future situations. In all cases, each proxy will be considered based on the relevant facts and circumstances.
Board of directors. The investment manager supports an independent board of directors, and prefers that key committees such as audit, nominating, and
compensation committees be comprised of independent directors. The investment manager will generally vote against management efforts to classify a board and will generally support proposals to declassify the board of directors. The investment manager will consider withholding votes from directors who have attended less than 75% of meetings without a valid reason. While generally in favor of separating Chairman and CEO positions, the investment manager will review this issue as well as proposals to restore or provide for cumulative voting on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration factors such as the companys corporate governance guidelines or provisions and performance. The investment manager generally will support non-binding shareholder proposals to require a majority vote standard for the election of directors; however, if these proposals are binding, the investment manager will give careful review on a case-by-case basis of the potential ramifications of such implementation.
In the event of a contested election, the investment manager will review a number of factors in making a decision including managements track record, the companys financial performance, qualifications of candidates on both slates, and the strategic plan of the dissidents.
Ratification of auditors of portfolio companies. The investment manager will closely scrutinize the independence, role and performance of auditors. On a case-by-case basis, the investment manager will examine proposals relating to non-audit relationships and non-audit fees. The investment manager will also consider, on a case-by-case basis, proposals to rotate auditors, and will vote against the ratification of auditors when there is clear and compelling evidence of a lack of independence, accounting irregularities or negligence. The investment manager may also consider whether the ratification of auditors has been approved by an appropriate audit committee that meets applicable composition and independence requirements.
Management and director compensation. A companys equity-based compensation plan should be in alignment with the shareholders long-term interests. The investment manager believes that executive compensation should be directly linked to the performance of the company. The investment manager evaluates plans on a case-by-case basis by considering several factors to determine whether the plan is fair and reasonable, including the ISS quantitative model utilized to assess such plans and/or the Glass Lewis evaluation of the plans. The investment manager will generally oppose plans that have the potential to be excessively dilutive, and will almost always oppose plans that are structured to allow the repricing of underwater options, or plans that have an automatic share replenishment evergreen feature. The investment manager will generally support employee stock option plans in which the purchase price is at least 85% of fair market value, and when potential dilution is 10% or less.
Severance compensation arrangements will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis, although the investment manager will generally oppose golden parachutes that are considered to be excessive. The investment manager will normally support proposals that require a percentage of directors compensation to be in the form of common stock, as it aligns their interests with those of shareholders.
The investment manager will review non-binding say-on-pay proposals on a case-by-case basis, and will generally vote in favor of such proposals unless compensation is misaligned with performance and/or shareholders interests, the company has not provided reasonably clear disclosure regarding its compensation practices, or there are concerns with the companys remuneration practices.
Anti-takeover mechanisms and related issues. The investment manager generally opposes anti-takeover measures since they tend to reduce shareholder rights. However, as with all proxy issues, the investment manager conducts an independent review of each anti-takeover proposal. On occasion, the investment manager may vote with management when the research analyst has concluded that the proposal is not onerous and would not harm the Fund or its shareholders interests. The investment manager generally supports proposals that require shareholder rights plans (poison pills) to be subject to a shareholder vote and will closely evaluate such plans on a case-by-case basis to determine whether or not they warrant support. In addition, the investment manager will generally vote against any proposal to issue stock that has unequal or subordinate voting rights. The investment manager generally opposes any supermajority voting requirements as well as the payment of greenmail. The investment manager generally supports fair price provisions and confidential voting. The investment manager will review a companys proposal to reincorporate to a different state or country on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration financial benefits such as tax treatment as well as comparing corporate governance provisions and general business laws that may result from the change in domicile.
Changes to capital structure. The investment manager realizes that a company's financing decisions have a significant impact on its shareholders, particularly when they involve the issuance of additional shares of common or preferred stock or the assumption of additional debt. The investment manager will review, on a case-by-case basis, proposals by companies to increase authorized shares and the purpose for the increase. The investment manager will generally not vote in favor of dual-class capital structures to increase the number of authorized shares where that class of stock would have superior voting rights. The investment manager will generally vote in favor of the issuance of preferred stock in cases where the company specifies the voting, dividend, conversion and other rights of such stock and the terms of the preferred stock issuance are deemed reasonable. The investment manager will review proposals seeking preemptive rights on a case-by-case basis.
Mergers and corporate restructuring. Mergers and acquisitions will be subject to careful review by the research analyst to determine whether they would be beneficial to shareholders. The investment manager will analyze various economic and strategic factors in making the final decision on a merger or acquisition. Corporate restructuring proposals are also subject to a thorough examination on a case-by-case basis.
Environment, social and governance issues. The investment manager will generally give management discretion with regard to social, environmental and ethical issues, although the investment manager may vote in favor of those that are believed to have significant economic benefits or implications for the Fund and its shareholders. The investment manager generally supports the right of shareholders to call special meetings and act by written consent. However, the investment manager will review such shareholder proposals on a case-by-case basis in an effort to ensure that such proposals do not disrupt the course of business or waste company resources for the benefit of a small minority of shareholders. The investment manager will consider supporting a shareholder proposal seeking disclosure and greater board oversight of lobbying and corporate political contributions if the investment manager believes that there is evidence of inadequate oversight by the companys board, if the companys current disclosure is significantly deficient, or if the disclosure is notably lacking in comparison to the companys peers. The investment manager will consider on a case-by-case basis any well-drafted and reasonable proposals for
proxy access considering such factors as the size of the company, ownership thresholds and holding periods, responsiveness of management, intentions of the shareholder proponent, company performance, and shareholder base.
Global corporate governance. Many of the tenets discussed above are applied to the investment manager's proxy voting decisions for international investments. However, the investment manager must be flexible in these worldwide markets. Principles of good corporate governance may vary by country, given the constraints of a countrys laws and acceptable practices in the markets. As a result, it is on occasion difficult to apply a consistent set of governance practices to all issuers. As experienced money managers, the investment manager's analysts are skilled in understanding the complexities of the regions in which they specialize and are trained to analyze proxy issues germane to their regions.
The investment manager will generally attempt to process every proxy it receives for all domestic and foreign securities. However, there may be situations in which the investment manager may be unable to vote a proxy, or may choose not to vote a proxy, such as where: (i) the proxy ballot was not received from the custodian bank; (ii) a meeting notice was received too late; (iii) there are fees imposed upon the exercise of a vote and it is determined that such fees outweigh the benefit of voting; (iv) there are legal encumbrances to voting, including blocking restrictions in certain markets that preclude the ability to dispose of a security if the investment manager votes a proxy or where the investment manager is prohibited from voting by applicable law or other regulatory or market requirements, including but not limited to, effective Powers of Attorney; (v) the investment manager held shares on the record date but has sold them prior to the meeting date; (vi) proxy voting service is not offered by the custodian in the market; (vii) the investment manager believes it is not in the best interest of the Fund or its shareholders to vote the proxy for any other reason not enumerated herein; or (viii) a security is subject to a securities lending or similar program that has transferred legal title to the security to another person. The investment manager or its affiliates may, on behalf of one or more of the proprietary registered investment companies advised by the investment manager or its affiliates, determine to use its best efforts to recall any security on loan where the investment manager or its affiliates (a) learn of a vote on a material event that may affect a security on loan and (b) determine that it is in the best interests of such proprietary registered investment companies to recall the security for voting purposes.
Shareholders may view the complete Policies online at franklintempleton.com. Alternatively, shareholders may request copies of the Policies free of charge by calling the Proxy Group collect at (954) 527-7678 or by sending a written request to: Franklin Templeton Companies, LLC, 300 S.E. 2nd Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-1923, Attention: Proxy Group. Copies of the Funds proxy voting records are available online at franklintempleton.com and posted on the SEC website at www.sec.gov. The proxy voting records are updated each year by August 31 to reflect the most recent 12-month period ended June 30.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
(a)(1) As of October 28, 2013, the portfolio manager of the Fund is as follows:
MICHAEL HASENSTAB Ph.D, Senior Vice President of Franklin Advisers, Inc.
Dr. Hasenstab has been a portfolio manager of the Fund since 2002. He has final
authority over all aspects of the Fund's investment portfolio, including but not limited to, purchases and sales of individual securities, portfolio risk assessment, and the management of daily cash balances in accordance with anticipated management requirements. The degree to which he may perform these functions, and the nature of these functions, may change from time to time. He first joined Franklin Templeton Investments in 1995, rejoining again in 2001 after a three-year leave to obtain his PH.D.
(a)(2) This section reflects information about the portfolio managers as of the fiscal year ended August 31, 2013.
The following table shows the number of other accounts managed by each portfolio manager and the total assets in the accounts managed within each category:
Assets of | Assets of | |||||||
Number of | Other | Other | ||||||
Other | Registered | Number of | Pooled | Assets of | ||||
Registered | Investment | Other | Investment | Other | ||||
Investment | Companies | Pooled | Vehicles | Number | Accounts | |||
Companies | Managed | Investment | Managed | of Other | Managed | |||
Managed | (x $1 | Vehicles | (x $1 | Accounts | (x $1 | |||
Name | million) | Managed1 | million)1 | Managed1 | million)1 | |||
Michael | ||||||||
Hasenstab | 17 | 86,299.9 | 422 | 103,825.6 | 142 | 4,429.9 | ||
1 | . | The various pooled investment vehicles and accounts listed are managed by a team of | ||||||
investment professionals. Accordingly, the individual managers listed would not be solely | ||||||||
responsible for managing such listed amounts. | ||||||||
2 | . | Dr. Hasenstab manages other account with $436.2 in assets and also manages a pooled account | ||||||
with $434.9 in assets with a performance fee. |
Portfolio managers that provide investment services to the Fund may also provide services to a variety of other investment products, including other funds, institutional accounts and private accounts. The advisory fees for some of such other products and accounts may be different than that charged to the Fund and may include performance-based compensation (as noted, in the chart above, if any). This may result in fees that are higher (or lower) than the advisory fees paid by the Fund. As a matter of policy, each fund or account is managed solely for the benefit of the beneficial owners thereof. As discussed below, the separation of the trading execution function from the portfolio management function and the application of objectively based trade allocation procedures help to mitigate potential conflicts of interest that may arise as a result of the portfolio managers managing accounts with different advisory fees.
Conflicts. The management of multiple funds, including the Fund, and accounts may also give rise to potential conflicts of interest if the funds and other accounts have different objectives, benchmarks, time horizons, and fees as the portfolio manager must allocate his or her time and investment ideas across multiple funds and accounts. The manager seeks to manage such competing interests for the time and attention of portfolio managers by having portfolio managers focus on a particular investment discipline. Most other accounts managed by a portfolio manager are managed using the same investment strategies that are used in connection with the management of the Fund. Accordingly, portfolio holdings, position sizes, and industry and sector exposures tend to be similar across similar portfolios, which may minimize the potential for conflicts of interest. As noted above, the separate management of the trade execution and valuation functions from the portfolio management process also helps to reduce potential conflicts of interest. However, securities selected
for funds or accounts other than the Fund may outperform the securities
selected for the Fund. Moreover, if a portfolio manager identifies a limited
investment opportunity that may be suitable for more than one fund or other
account, the Fund may not be able to take full advantage of that opportunity
due to an allocation of that opportunity across all eligible funds and other
accounts. The manager seeks to manage such potential conflicts by using
procedures intended to provide a fair allocation of buy and sell opportunities
among funds and other accounts.
The structure of a portfolio manager’s compensation may give rise to potential
conflicts of interest. A portfolio manager’s base pay and bonus tend to
increase with additional and more complex responsibilities that include
increased assets under management. As such, there may be an indirect
relationship between a portfolio manager’s marketing or sales efforts and his
or her bonus.
Finally, the management of personal accounts by a portfolio manager may give
rise to potential conflicts of interest. While the funds and the manager have
adopted a code of ethics, which they believe contains provisions reasonably
necessary to prevent a wide range of prohibited activities by portfolio
managers and others with respect to their personal trading activities, there
can be no assurance that the code of ethics addresses all individual conduct
that could result in conflicts of interest.
The manager and the Fund have adopted certain compliance procedures that are
designed to address these, and other, types of conflicts. However, there is no
guarantee that such procedures will detect each and every situation where a
conflict arises.
Compensation. The investment manager seeks to maintain a compensation program
that is competitively positioned to attract, retain and motivate top-quality
investment professionals. Portfolio managers receive a base salary, a cash
incentive bonus opportunity, an equity compensation opportunity, and a benefits
package. Portfolio manager compensation is reviewed annually and the level of
compensation is based on individual performance, the salary range for a
portfolio manager’s level of responsibility and Franklin Templeton guidelines.
Portfolio managers are provided no financial incentive to favor one fund or
account over another. Each portfolio manager’s compensation consists of the
following three elements:
Base salary Each portfolio manager is paid a base salary.
Annual bonus Annual bonuses are structured to align the interests of the
portfolio manager with those of the Fund’s shareholders. Each portfolio
manager is eligible to receive an annual bonus. Bonuses generally are split
between cash (50% to 65%) and restricted shares of Resources stock (17.5% to
25%) and mutual fund shares (17.5% to 25%). The deferred equity-based
compensation is intended to build a vested interest of the portfolio manager
in the financial performance of both Resources and mutual funds advised by
the investment manager. The bonus plan is intended to provide a competitive
level of annual bonus compensation that is tied to the portfolio manager
achieving consistently strong investment performance, which aligns the
financial incentives of the portfolio manager and Fund shareholders. The
Chief Investment Officer of the investment manager and/or other officers of
the investment manager, with responsibility for the Fund, have discretion in
the granting of annual bonuses to portfolio managers in accordance with
Franklin Templeton guidelines. The following factors are generally used in
determining bonuses under the plan:
Investment performance. Primary consideration is given to the historic
investment performance of all accounts managed by the portfolio manager
over the 1, 3 and 5 preceding years measured against risk benchmarks
developed by the fixed income management team. The pre-tax performance of
each fund managed is measured relative to a relevant peer group and/or
applicable benchmark as appropriate.
Non-investment performance. The more qualitative contributions of the
portfolio manager to the investment managers business and the investment
management team, including business knowledge, productivity, customer
service, creativity, and contribution to team goals, are evaluated in
determining the amount of any bonus award.
Responsibilities. The characteristics and complexity of funds managed by
the portfolio manager are factored in the investment managers appraisal.
Additional long-term equity-based compensation Portfolio managers may also
be awarded restricted shares or units of Resources stock or restricted
shares or units of one or more mutual funds. Awards of such deferred equity-
based compensation typically vest over time, so as to create incentives to
retain key talent.
Portfolio managers also participate in benefit plans and programs available
generally to all employees of the investment manager.
Ownership of Fund shares. The investment manager has a policy of encouraging
portfolio managers to invest in the funds they manage. Exceptions arise when,
for example, a fund is closed to new investors or when tax considerations or
jurisdictional constraints cause such an investment to be inappropriate for the
portfolio manager. The following is the dollar range of Fund shares beneficially
owned by the portfolio manager (such amounts may change from time to time):
Dollar Range of Fund Shares | |
Beneficially Owned | |
Portfolio Manager | |
Michael Hasenstab | None |
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment
Company and Affiliated Purchasers. N/A
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
There have been no changes to the procedures by which shareholders may
recommend nominees to the Registrant's Board of Trustees that would require
disclosure herein.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Registrant maintains
disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in the Registrants filings under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940 is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the periods specified in the rules
and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Such information is
accumulated and communicated to the Registrants management, including its
principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Registrants
management, including the principal executive officer and the principal
financial officer, recognizes that any set of controls and procedures, no
matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of
achieving the desired control objectives.
Within 90 days prior to the filing date of this Shareholder Report on Form N-
CSR, the Registrant had carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and
with the participation of the Registrants management, including the
Registrants principal executive officer and the Registrants principal
financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the
Registrants disclosure controls and procedures. Based on such evaluation, the
Registrants principal executive officer and principal financial officer
concluded that the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures are
effective.
(b) Changes in Internal Controls. There have been no changes in the
Registrants internal controls or in other factors that could materially affect
the internal controls over financial reporting subsequent to the date of their
evaluation in connection with the preparation of this Shareholder Report on
Form N-CSR.
Item 12. Exhibits.
(a)(1) Code of Ethics
(a)(2) Certifications pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
of Laura F. Fergerson, Chief Executive Officer - Finance and Administration, and
Mark H. Otani, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
(b) Certifications pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of
Laura F. Fergerson, Chief Executive Officer - Finance and Administration, and
Mark H. Otani, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
TEMPLETON EMERGING MARKETS INCOME FUND
By /s/LAURA F. FERGERSON
Laura F. Fergerson
Chief Executive Officer - Finance and
Administration
Date: October 28, 2013
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By /s/LAURA F. FERGERSON
Laura F. Fergerson
Chief Executive Officer - Finance and
Administration
Date: October 28, 2013
By /s/MARK H. OTANI
Mark H. Otani
Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Accounting Officer
Date: October 28, 2013