10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 |
or |
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to |
Commission File Number 1-8787
American International Group, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
13-2592361 |
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
70 Pine Street, New York, New York |
|
10270 |
(Address of principal executive
offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(212) 770-7000
Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if
changed since last report: None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o |
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
(Do
not check if a |
|
smaller
reporting company) |
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell
company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of July 31, 2008, there were
2,688,833,724 shares outstanding of the registrants
common stock.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
Description |
|
Number |
|
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures
|
|
|
123 |
|
PART II OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
Item 6. |
|
Exhibits
|
|
|
124 |
|
SIGNATURES |
|
|
125 |
|
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Part I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Financial Statements (unaudited)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(in millions) (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
| |
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments and Financial Services assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds available for sale, at fair value (amortized cost:
2008 $400,052; 2007 $393,170)
|
|
$ |
393,316 |
|
|
$ |
397,372 |
|
|
|
|
Bonds held to maturity, at amortized cost (fair value:
2008 $21,809; 2007 $22,157)
|
|
|
21,632 |
|
|
|
21,581 |
|
|
|
|
Bond trading securities, at fair value
|
|
|
8,801 |
|
|
|
9,982 |
|
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stocks available for sale, at fair value (cost:
2008 $13,490; 2007 $12,588)
|
|
|
17,306 |
|
|
|
17,900 |
|
|
|
|
Common and preferred stocks trading, at fair value
|
|
|
22,514 |
|
|
|
21,376 |
|
|
|
|
Preferred stocks available for sale, at fair value (cost:
2008 $2,596; 2007 $2,600)
|
|
|
2,496 |
|
|
|
2,370 |
|
|
|
Mortgage and other loans receivable, net of allowance
(2008 $99; 2007 $77) (held for sale:
2008 $30; 2007 $377 (amount measured at
fair value: 2008 $745)
|
|
|
34,384 |
|
|
|
33,727 |
|
|
|
Financial Services assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flight equipment primarily under operating leases, net of
accumulated depreciation (2008 $11,359;
2007 $10,499)
|
|
|
43,887 |
|
|
|
41,984 |
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale, at fair value (cost:
2008 $1,246; 2007 $40,157)
|
|
|
1,205 |
|
|
|
40,305 |
|
|
|
|
Trading securities, at fair value
|
|
|
35,170 |
|
|
|
4,197 |
|
|
|
|
Spot commodities, at fair value
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on swaps, options and forward transactions, at
fair value
|
|
|
11,548 |
|
|
|
12,318 |
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
2,294 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell, at fair value
in 2008
|
|
|
16,597 |
|
|
|
20,950 |
|
|
|
|
Finance receivables, net of allowance (2008 $1,133;
2007 $878) (held for sale: 2008 $36;
2007 $233)
|
|
|
33,311 |
|
|
|
31,234 |
|
|
|
Securities lending invested collateral, at fair value (cost:
2008 $67,758; 2007 $80,641)
|
|
|
59,530 |
|
|
|
75,662 |
|
|
|
Other invested assets (amount measured at fair value:
2008 $22,099; 2007 $20,827)
|
|
|
62,029 |
|
|
|
58,823 |
|
|
|
Short-term investments (amount measured at fair value:
2008 $24,167)
|
|
|
69,492 |
|
|
|
51,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments and Financial Services assets
|
|
|
835,602 |
|
|
|
842,042 |
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
2,229 |
|
|
|
2,284 |
|
|
Investment income due and accrued
|
|
|
6,614 |
|
|
|
6,587 |
|
|
Premiums and insurance balances receivable, net of allowance
(2008 $596; 2007 $662)
|
|
|
20,050 |
|
|
|
18,395 |
|
|
Reinsurance assets, net of allowance (2008 $502;
2007 $520)
|
|
|
22,940 |
|
|
|
23,103 |
|
|
Current and deferred income taxes
|
|
|
8,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
46,733 |
|
|
|
43,914 |
|
|
Investments in partially owned companies
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
654 |
|
|
Real estate and other fixed assets, net of accumulated
depreciation (2008 $5,710; 2007 $5,446)
|
|
|
5,692 |
|
|
|
5,518 |
|
|
Separate and variable accounts, at fair value
|
|
|
73,401 |
|
|
|
78,684 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
10,661 |
|
|
|
9,414 |
|
|
Other assets (amount measured at fair value: 2008
$2,452; 2007 $4,152)
|
|
|
17,115 |
|
|
|
17,766 |
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
1,049,876 |
|
|
$ |
1,048,361 |
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
1
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEET (continued)
(in millions, except share
data) (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
| |
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses
|
|
$ |
88,747 |
|
|
$ |
85,500 |
|
|
Unearned premiums
|
|
|
28,738 |
|
|
|
27,703 |
|
|
Future policy benefits for life and accident and health
insurance contracts
|
|
|
147,232 |
|
|
|
136,387 |
|
|
Policyholders contract deposits (amount measured at fair
value: 2008 $4,179; 2007 $295)
|
|
|
265,411 |
|
|
|
258,459 |
|
|
Other policyholders funds
|
|
|
13,773 |
|
|
|
12,599 |
|
|
Commissions, expenses and taxes payable
|
|
|
5,597 |
|
|
|
6,310 |
|
|
Insurance balances payable
|
|
|
5,569 |
|
|
|
4,878 |
|
|
Funds held by companies under reinsurance treaties
|
|
|
2,498 |
|
|
|
2,501 |
|
|
Current income taxes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,823 |
|
|
Financial Services liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (amount measured
at fair value: 2008 $8,338)
|
|
|
9,659 |
|
|
|
8,331 |
|
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
1,622 |
|
|
|
6,445 |
|
|
|
Securities and spot commodities sold but not yet purchased, at
fair value
|
|
|
3,189 |
|
|
|
4,709 |
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on swaps, options and forward transactions, at
fair value
|
|
|
24,232 |
|
|
|
14,817 |
|
|
|
Trust deposits and deposits due to banks and other depositors
(amount measured at fair value: 2008 $240)
|
|
|
6,165 |
|
|
|
4,903 |
|
|
Commercial paper and extendible commercial notes
|
|
|
15,061 |
|
|
|
13,114 |
|
|
Long-term borrowings (amount measured at fair value:
2008 $53,839)
|
|
|
163,577 |
|
|
|
162,935 |
|
|
Separate and variable accounts
|
|
|
73,401 |
|
|
|
78,684 |
|
|
Securities lending payable
|
|
|
75,056 |
|
|
|
81,965 |
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
11,149 |
|
|
|
10,422 |
|
|
Other liabilities (amount measured at fair value:
2008 $6,861; 2007 $3,262)
|
|
|
31,012 |
|
|
|
27,975 |
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
971,688 |
|
|
|
952,460 |
|
|
Preferred shareholders equity in subsidiary
companies
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees (See Note 6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $2.50 par value; 5,000,000,000 shares
authorized; shares issued 2008 2,948,038,001;
2007 2,751,327,476
|
|
|
7,370 |
|
|
|
6,878 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
9,446 |
|
|
|
2,848 |
|
|
Payments advanced to purchase shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(912 |
) |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
73,743 |
|
|
|
89,029 |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(3,903 |
) |
|
|
4,643 |
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost; 2008 259,225,244;
2007 221,743,421 shares of common stock
|
|
|
(8,568 |
) |
|
|
(6,685 |
) |
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
78,088 |
|
|
|
95,801 |
|
|
Total liabilities, preferred shareholders equity in
subsidiary companies and shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
1,049,876 |
|
|
$ |
1,048,361 |
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
2
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share data) (unaudited) | |
| |
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Six Months | |
|
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
| |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums and other considerations
|
|
$ |
21,735 |
|
|
$ |
19,533 |
|
|
$ |
42,407 |
|
|
$ |
39,175 |
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
6,728 |
|
|
|
7,853 |
|
|
|
11,682 |
|
|
|
14,977 |
|
|
Net realized capital losses
|
|
|
(6,081 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(12,170 |
) |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
Unrealized market valuation losses on AIGFP super senior credit
default swap portfolio
|
|
|
(5,565 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,672 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
3,116 |
|
|
|
3,792 |
|
|
|
6,717 |
|
|
|
7,741 |
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
19,933 |
|
|
|
31,150 |
|
|
|
33,964 |
|
|
|
61,795 |
|
|
Benefits and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incurred policy losses and benefits
|
|
|
18,450 |
|
|
|
16,221 |
|
|
|
34,332 |
|
|
|
32,367 |
|
|
Insurance acquisition and other operating expenses
|
|
|
10,239 |
|
|
|
8,601 |
|
|
|
19,652 |
|
|
|
16,928 |
|
|
|
Total benefits and expenses
|
|
|
28,689 |
|
|
|
24,822 |
|
|
|
53,984 |
|
|
|
49,295 |
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes (benefits) and
minority interest
|
|
|
(8,756 |
) |
|
|
6,328 |
|
|
|
(20,020 |
) |
|
|
12,500 |
|
Income taxes (benefits)
|
|
|
(3,357 |
) |
|
|
1,679 |
|
|
|
(6,894 |
) |
|
|
3,405 |
|
|
Income (loss) before minority interest
|
|
|
(5,399 |
) |
|
|
4,649 |
|
|
|
(13,126 |
) |
|
|
9,095 |
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
(372 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(688 |
) |
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(5,357 |
) |
|
$ |
4,277 |
|
|
$ |
(13,162 |
) |
|
$ |
8,407 |
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
(2.06 |
) |
|
$ |
1.64 |
|
|
$ |
(5.11 |
) |
|
$ |
3.22 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
(2.06 |
) |
|
$ |
1.64 |
|
|
$ |
(5.11 |
) |
|
$ |
3.21 |
|
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
$ |
0.220 |
|
|
$ |
0.200 |
|
|
$ |
0.420 |
|
|
$ |
0.365 |
|
|
Average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
2,605 |
|
|
|
2,602 |
|
|
|
2,575 |
|
|
|
2,607 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
2,605 |
|
|
|
2,613 |
|
|
|
2,575 |
|
|
|
2,621 |
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
3
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 | |
|
|
| |
(in millions, except share and per share data) (unaudited) |
|
Amounts | |
|
Shares | |
| |
Common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$ |
6,878 |
|
|
|
2,751,327,476 |
|
|
|
Issuances
|
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
196,710,525 |
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
|
7,370 |
|
|
|
2,948,038,001 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
|
2,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess of proceeds over par value of common stock issued
|
|
|
6,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of future contract adjustment payments related to
issuance of equity units
|
|
|
(431 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess of cost over proceeds of common stock issued under stock
plans
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
|
9,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments advanced to purchase shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
|
(912 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments advanced
|
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares purchased
|
|
|
1,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
|
89,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting changes, net of tax
|
|
|
(1,003 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted balance, beginning of period
|
|
|
88,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(13,162 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends to common shareholders ($0.42 per share)
|
|
|
(1,121 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
|
73,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments, net
of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
|
4,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting changes, net of tax
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted balance, beginning of period
|
|
|
4,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized depreciation of investments, net of
reclassification adjustments
|
|
|
(14,254 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
4,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
|
(5,171 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation adjustment
|
|
|
1,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
|
1,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net derivative gains (losses) arising from cash flow hedging
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred gains on cash flow hedges, net of reclassification
adjustments
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax expense
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement plan liabilities adjustment, net of taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
|
(525 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service credit
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax expense
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
|
(515 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), end of period
|
|
|
(3,903 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
|
(6,685 |
) |
|
|
(221,743,421 |
) |
|
|
Shares acquired
|
|
|
(1,912 |
) |
|
|
(37,927,125 |
) |
|
|
Issued under stock plans
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
443,767 |
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,535 |
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
|
(8,568 |
) |
|
|
(259,225,244 |
) |
|
Total shareholders equity, end of period
|
|
$ |
78,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
4
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) (unaudited) | |
| |
|
|
Six Months | |
|
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
| |
Summary:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$ |
16,589 |
|
|
$ |
17,431 |
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(21,963 |
) |
|
|
(40,314 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
5,274 |
|
|
|
22,947 |
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
Change in cash
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
45 |
|
|
Cash at beginning of year period
|
|
|
2,284 |
|
|
|
1,590 |
|
|
|
Cash at end of year period
|
|
$ |
2,229 |
|
|
$ |
1,635 |
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(13,162 |
) |
|
$ |
8,407 |
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash revenues, expenses, gains and losses included in
income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized market valuation losses on AIGFP super senior credit
default swap portfolio
|
|
|
14,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gains on sales of securities available for sale and other
assets
|
|
|
(494 |
) |
|
|
(732 |
) |
|
|
Foreign exchange transaction (gains) losses
|
|
|
857 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
Net unrealized (gains) losses on non-AIGFP derivatives and
other assets and liabilities
|
|
|
2,086 |
|
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
Equity in income of partially owned companies and other invested
assets
|
|
|
(151 |
) |
|
|
(2,747 |
) |
|
|
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
7,343 |
|
|
|
5,911 |
|
|
|
Depreciation and other amortization
|
|
|
1,799 |
|
|
|
1,608 |
|
|
|
Provision for mortgage, other loans and finance receivables
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairments
|
|
|
12,416 |
|
|
|
884 |
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and life insurance reserves
|
|
|
9,748 |
|
|
|
8,238 |
|
|
|
Premiums and insurance balances receivable and
payable net
|
|
|
(1,104 |
) |
|
|
(941 |
) |
|
|
Reinsurance assets
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
Capitalization of deferred policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
(9,160 |
) |
|
|
(7,567 |
) |
|
|
Investment income due and accrued
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
Funds held under reinsurance treaties
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
Other policyholders funds
|
|
|
851 |
|
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
Income taxes receivable and payable net
|
|
|
(6,960 |
) |
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
Commissions, expenses and taxes payable
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
Other assets and liabilities net
|
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
Trade receivables and payables net
|
|
|
(6,446 |
) |
|
|
(925 |
) |
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
930 |
|
|
|
(2,258 |
) |
|
|
Spot commodities
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
Net unrealized (gain) loss on swaps, options and forward
transactions
|
|
|
(3,993 |
) |
|
|
1,317 |
|
|
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
|
|
|
4,353 |
|
|
|
2,116 |
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
1,237 |
|
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
Securities and spot commodities sold but not yet purchased
|
|
|
(1,531 |
) |
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
Finance receivables and other loans held for sale
originations and purchases
|
|
|
(279 |
) |
|
|
(3,957 |
) |
|
|
Sales of finance receivables and other loans held
for sale
|
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
4,177 |
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
922 |
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
29,751 |
|
|
|
9,024 |
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
16,589 |
|
|
$ |
17,431 |
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
5
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH
FLOWS (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) (unaudited) | |
| |
|
|
Six Months | |
|
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from (payments for)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and maturities of fixed maturity securities available for
sale and hybrid investments
|
|
$ |
42,026 |
|
|
$ |
64,563 |
|
|
Sales of equity securities available for sale
|
|
|
4,861 |
|
|
|
4,275 |
|
|
Proceeds from fixed maturity securities held to maturity
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
Sales of trading securities
|
|
|
14,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of flight equipment
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
Sales or distributions of other invested assets
|
|
|
8,715 |
|
|
|
6,208 |
|
|
Payments received on mortgage and other loans receivable
|
|
|
3,457 |
|
|
|
2,270 |
|
|
Principal payments received on finance receivables held for
investment
|
|
|
6,757 |
|
|
|
6,430 |
|
|
Purchases of fixed maturity securities available for sale and
hybrid investments
|
|
|
(47,114 |
) |
|
|
(72,348 |
) |
|
Purchases of equity securities available for sale
|
|
|
(5,808 |
) |
|
|
(5,852 |
) |
|
Purchases of fixed maturity securities held to maturity
|
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
Purchases of trading securities
|
|
|
(9,244 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of flight equipment (including progress payments)
|
|
|
(2,950 |
) |
|
|
(3,883 |
) |
|
Purchases of other invested assets
|
|
|
(11,988 |
) |
|
|
(12,171 |
) |
|
Mortgage and other loans receivable issued
|
|
|
(3,340 |
) |
|
|
(5,029 |
) |
|
Finance receivables held for investment originations
and purchases
|
|
|
(8,778 |
) |
|
|
(7,387 |
) |
|
Change in securities lending invested collateral
|
|
|
6,315 |
|
|
|
(11,772 |
) |
|
Net additions to real estate, fixed assets, and other assets
|
|
|
(663 |
) |
|
|
(466 |
) |
|
Net change in short-term investments
|
|
|
(18,832 |
) |
|
|
(4,636 |
) |
|
Net change in non-AIGFP derivative assets and liabilities
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
(548 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
$ |
(21,963 |
) |
|
$ |
(40,314 |
) |
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from (payments for)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policyholders contract deposits
|
|
$ |
33,322 |
|
|
$ |
28,769 |
|
|
Policyholders contract withdrawals
|
|
|
(27,926 |
) |
|
|
(29,379 |
) |
|
Change in other deposits
|
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
(823 |
) |
|
Change in commercial paper and extendible commercial notes
|
|
|
1,930 |
|
|
|
1,768 |
|
|
Long-term borrowings issued
|
|
|
55,685 |
|
|
|
50,091 |
|
|
Repayments on long-term borrowings
|
|
|
(56,645 |
) |
|
|
(34,937 |
) |
|
Change in securities lending payable
|
|
|
(6,919 |
) |
|
|
12,021 |
|
|
Proceeds from common stock issued
|
|
|
7,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of treasury stock
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
Payments advanced to purchase treasury stock
|
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
Cash dividends paid to shareholders
|
|
|
(1,036 |
) |
|
|
(859 |
) |
|
Acquisition of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(173 |
) |
|
|
132 |
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
$ |
5,274 |
|
|
$ |
22,947 |
|
|
Supplementary disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$ |
3,493 |
|
|
$ |
3,744 |
|
|
Taxes
|
|
$ |
66 |
|
|
$ |
3,524 |
|
Non-cash financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest credited to policyholder accounts included in financing
activities
|
|
$ |
3,815 |
|
|
$ |
5,932 |
|
|
Treasury stock acquired using payments advanced to purchase
shares
|
|
$ |
1,912 |
|
|
$ |
1,664 |
|
|
Present value of future contract adjustment payments related to
issuance of equity units
|
|
$ |
431 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Non-cash investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt assumed on acquisitions and warehoused investments
|
|
$ |
153 |
|
|
$ |
354 |
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
6
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) (unaudited) | |
| |
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Six Months | |
|
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
| |
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(5,357 |
) |
|
$ |
4,277 |
|
|
$ |
(13,162 |
) |
|
$ |
8,407 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax benefit on above changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (depreciation) appreciation of
investments net of reclassification adjustments
|
|
|
(3,682 |
) |
|
|
(2,161 |
) |
|
|
(14,254 |
) |
|
|
(852 |
) |
|
|
Deferred income tax benefit on above changes
|
|
|
1,065 |
|
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
4,813 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
1,108 |
|
|
|
(329 |
) |
|
|
Deferred income tax benefit (expense) on above changes
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
Net derivative gains (losses) arising from cash flow hedging
activities net of reclassification adjustments
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
Deferred income tax benefit on above changes
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
Change in pension and postretirement unrecognized periodic
benefit
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
Deferred income tax benefit (expense) on above changes
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(2,632 |
) |
|
|
(1,667 |
) |
|
|
(8,546 |
) |
|
|
(923 |
) |
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(7,989 |
) |
|
$ |
2,610 |
|
|
$ |
(21,708 |
) |
|
$ |
7,484 |
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
7
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited)
|
|
1. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Basis of Presentation
These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do
not include all disclosures required by accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) for complete
financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the
audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes
included in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of
American International Group, Inc. (AIG) for the year ended
December 31, 2007 (2007 Annual Report on
Form 10-K).
In the opinion of management, these consolidated financial
statements contain the normal recurring adjustments necessary
for a fair statement of the results presented herein. All
material intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated.
Changes in Presentation
In the second quarter of 2008, AIG determined that certain
accident and health contracts in its Foreign General Insurance
reporting unit, which were previously accounted for as short
duration contracts, should be treated as long duration insurance
products. Accordingly, the December 31, 2007 consolidated
balance sheet has been revised to reflect the reclassification
of $763 million of deferred direct response advertising costs,
previously reported in other assets, to deferred policy
acquisition costs. Additionally, $320 million has been
reclassified on the consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2007 from unearned premiums to future policy
benefits for life and accident and health insurance contracts.
These revisions did not have a material effect on AIGs
consolidated income before income taxes, net income, or
shareholders equity for any period presented.
In addition, see Recent Accounting Standards
Accounting Changes, below for a discussion of AIGs
adoption of FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FIN 39-1,
Amendment of FASB Interpretation No. 39
(FSP FIN 39-1).
Additionally, certain other reclassifications and format changes
have been made to prior period amounts to conform to the current
period presentation.
Recent Accounting Standards
Accounting Changes
FAS 157
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(FAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(FAS 157). FAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure
requirements regarding fair value measurements but does not
change existing guidance about whether an asset or liability is
carried at fair value. FAS 157 nullifies the guidance in
Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue
No. 02-3,
Issues Involved in Accounting for Derivative Contracts
Held for Trading Purposes and Contracts Involved in Energy
Trading and Risk Management Activities,
(EITF 02-3) that
precluded the recognition of a trading profit at the inception
of a derivative contract unless the fair value of such contract
was obtained from a quoted market price or other valuation
technique incorporating observable market data. FAS 157
also clarifies that an issuers credit standing should be
considered when measuring liabilities at fair value. The fair
value measurement and related disclosure guidance in
FAS 157 do not apply to fair value measurements associated
with AIGs share-based employee compensation awards
accounted for in accordance with FAS 123(R),
Share-Based Payment.
AIG adopted FAS 157 on January 1, 2008, its required
effective date. FAS 157 must be applied prospectively,
except for certain stand-alone derivatives and hybrid
instruments initially measured using the guidance in
EITF 02-3, which
must be applied as a cumulative effect accounting change to
retained earnings at January 1, 2008. The cumulative
effect, net of taxes, of adopting FAS 157 on AIGs
consolidated balance sheet was an increase in retained earnings
of $4 million.
The most significant effect of adopting FAS 157 on
AIGs consolidated results of operations for the three- and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 related to changes in
fair value methodologies with respect to both liabilities
already carried at fair value, primarily hybrid notes and
derivatives, and newly elected liabilities measured at fair
value (see FAS 159 discussion below). Specifically, the
incorporation of AIGs own credit spreads and the
incorporation of explicit risk margins (embedded policy
derivatives at transition only) resulted in a decrease in
pre-tax income of $149 million ($97 million after tax)
and an increase in pre-tax income of $2.6 billion
($1.7 billion after tax) for the three- and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2008, respectively. The effect of
the changes in AIGs own credit spreads was a decrease in
pre-tax income of $112 million and an increase of
$2.5 billion for the three- and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2008, respectively. The effect of the changes in
counterparty credit spreads for assets measured at fair value at
AIG Financial Products Corp. and AIG Trading Group Inc. and
their respective subsidiaries (AIGFP) was decreases of
$362 million and $3.0 billion for the three- and
six-month periods ended
June 30, 2008, respectively.
See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
additional FAS 157 disclosures.
FAS 159
In February 2007, the FASB issued FAS 159, The Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities (FAS 159). FAS 159 permits entities
to choose to measure at
8
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(continued)
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
1. |
Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies (continued) |
fair value many financial instruments and certain other items
that are not required to be measured at fair value. Subsequent
changes in fair value for designated items are required to be
reported in income. FAS 159 also establishes presentation
and disclosure requirements for similar types of assets and
liabilities measured at fair value. FAS 159 permits the
fair value option election on an instrument-by-instrument basis
for eligible items existing at the adoption date and at initial
recognition of an asset or liability, or upon most events that
give rise to a new basis of accounting for that instrument.
AIG adopted FAS 159 on January 1, 2008, its required
effective date. The adoption of FAS 159 with respect to
elections made in the Life Insurance & Retirement
Services segment resulted in an after-tax decrease to 2008
opening retained earnings of $559 million. The adoption of
FAS 159 with respect to elections made by AIGFP resulted in
an after-tax decrease to 2008 opening retained earnings of
$448 million. Included in this amount are net unrealized
gains of $105 million that were reclassified to retained
earnings from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
related to available for sale securities recorded on the
consolidated balance sheet at January 1, 2008 for which the
fair value option was elected.
See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
additional FAS 159 disclosures.
FAS 157 and FAS 159
The following table summarizes the after-tax increase
(decrease) from adopting FAS 157 and FAS 159 on the
opening shareholders equity accounts at January 1,
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1, 2008 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
Cumulative | |
|
|
Other | |
|
|
|
Effect of | |
|
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Retained | |
|
Accounting | |
(in millions) |
|
Income/(Loss) | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Changes | |
|
FAS 157
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
FAS 159
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(1,007 |
) |
|
|
(1,112 |
) |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting changes
|
|
$ |
(105 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,003 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,108 |
) |
|
FSP FIN 39-1
In April 2007, the FASB directed the FASB Staff to issue FSP
FIN 39-1. FSP
FIN 39-1 modifies
FIN No. 39, Offsetting of Amounts Related to
Certain Contracts, and permits companies to offset cash
collateral receivables or payables against derivative
instruments under certain circumstances. AIG adopted the
provisions of FSP
FIN 39-1 effective
January 1, 2008, which requires retrospective application
to all prior periods presented. At June 30, 2008, the
amounts of cash collateral received and paid that were offset
against net derivative positions totaled $7.3 billion and
$12.3 billion, respectively. The cash collateral received
and paid related to AIGFP derivative instruments were previously
recorded in trade payables and trade receivables. Cash
collateral received related to non-AIGFP derivative instruments
was previously recorded in other liabilities. Accordingly, the
derivative assets and liabilities at December 31, 2007 have
been reduced by $6.3 billion and $5.8 billion,
respectively, related to the netting of cash collateral.
Future Application of Accounting Standards
FAS 141(R)
In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS 141 (revised 2007),
Business Combinations (FAS 141(R)).
FAS 141(R) changes the accounting for business combinations
in a number of ways, including broadening the transactions or
events that are considered business combinations; requiring an
acquirer to recognize 100 percent of the fair value of
assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and noncontrolling (i.e.,
minority) interests; recognizing contingent consideration
arrangements at their acquisition-date fair values with
subsequent changes in fair value generally reflected in income;
and recognizing preacquisition loss and gain contingencies at
their acquisition-date fair values, among other changes.
AIG is required to adopt FAS 141(R) for business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after
January 1, 2009. Early adoption is prohibited.
FAS 160
In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51
(FAS 160). FAS 160 requires noncontrolling (i.e.,
minority) interests in partially owned consolidated subsidiaries
to be classified in the consolidated balance sheet as a separate
component of consolidated shareholders equity.
FAS 160 also establishes accounting rules for subsequent
acquisitions and sales of noncontrolling interests and provides
for how noncontrolling interests should be presented in the
consolidated statement of income. The noncontrolling
interests share of subsidiary income should be reported as
a part of consolidated net income with disclosure of the
attribution of consolidated net income to the controlling and
noncontrolling interests on the face of the consolidated
statement of income.
AIG is required to adopt FAS 160 on January 1, 2009
and early application is prohibited. FAS 160 must be
adopted prospectively, except that noncontrolling interests
should be reclassified from liabilities to a separate component
of shareholders equity and consolidated net income should
be recast to include net income attributable to both the
controlling and noncontrolling interests retrospectively. AIG is
currently assessing the effect that adopting FAS 160 will
have on its consolidated financial statements.
9
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(continued)
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
1. |
Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies (continued) |
FAS 161
In March 2008, the FASB issued FAS 161, Disclosures
about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133
(FAS 161). FAS 161 requires enhanced disclosures about
(a) how and why AIG uses derivative instruments,
(b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are
accounted for under FAS No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
(FAS 133), and its related interpretations, and
(c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items
affect AIGs consolidated financial condition, results of
operations, and cash flows. FAS 161 is effective for AIG
beginning with financial statements issued in the first quarter
of 2009. Because FAS 161 only requires additional
disclosures about derivatives, it will have no effect on
AIGs consolidated financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows.
FAS 162
In May 2008, the FASB issued FAS 162, The Hierarchy of
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (FAS 162). FAS
162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the
framework for selecting the principles to be used in the
preparation of financial statements presented in conformity with
GAAP but does not change current practices. FAS 162 will become
effective on the
60th day
following Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approval of
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to
remove GAAP hierarchy from the auditing standards. FAS 162
will have no effect on AIGs consolidated financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows.
FSP FAS 140-3
In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS
No. 140-3,
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets and
Repurchase Financing Transactions (FSP FAS 140-3). FSP FAS
140-3 requires an initial transfer of a financial asset and a
repurchase financing that was entered into contemporaneously
with or in contemplation of the initial transfer to be evaluated
as a linked transaction unless certain criteria are met. FSP FAS
140-3 is effective for AIG beginning January 1, 2009 and
will be applied to new transactions entered into from that date
forward. Early adoption is prohibited. AIG is currently
assessing the effect that adopting FSP FAS 140-3 will have on
its consolidated financial statements but does not believe the
effect will be material.
10
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(continued)
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
AIG identifies its reportable segments by product line
consistent with its management structure. These segments are
General Insurance, Life Insurance & Retirement
Services, Financial Services and Asset Management.
AIGs operations by major operating segment were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Six Months | |
|
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
Ended June 30, | |
Operating Segments |
|
| |
|
| |
(in millions) | |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
| |
Total
revenues(a):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Insurance
|
|
$ |
12,757 |
|
|
$ |
12,928 |
|
|
$ |
25,046 |
|
|
$ |
25,831 |
|
|
Life Insurance & Retirement
Services(b)
|
|
|
10,161 |
|
|
|
14,023 |
|
|
|
18,913 |
|
|
|
27,705 |
|
|
Financial
Services(c)(d)
|
|
|
(3,605 |
) |
|
|
2,123 |
|
|
|
(10,165 |
) |
|
|
4,324 |
|
|
Asset
Management(e)
|
|
|
797 |
|
|
|
1,781 |
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
3,450 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
Consolidation and eliminations
|
|
|
(385 |
) |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
(558 |
) |
|
|
91 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
19,933 |
|
|
$ |
31,150 |
|
|
$ |
33,964 |
|
|
$ |
61,795 |
|
|
Operating income
(loss)(a):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Insurance
|
|
$ |
827 |
|
|
$ |
2,976 |
|
|
$ |
2,164 |
|
|
$ |
6,072 |
|
|
Life Insurance & Retirement
Services(b)
|
|
|
(2,401 |
) |
|
|
2,620 |
|
|
|
(4,232 |
) |
|
|
4,901 |
|
|
Financial
Services(c)(d)
|
|
|
(5,905 |
) |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
(14,677 |
) |
|
|
339 |
|
|
Asset
Management(e)
|
|
|
(314 |
) |
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
(1,565 |
) |
|
|
1,685 |
|
|
Other(f)
|
|
|
(715 |
) |
|
|
(460 |
) |
|
|
(1,483 |
) |
|
|
(930 |
) |
|
Consolidation and eliminations
|
|
|
(248 |
) |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
(227 |
) |
|
|
433 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
(8,756 |
) |
|
$ |
6,328 |
|
|
$ |
(20,020 |
) |
|
$ |
12,500 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Includes other-than-temporary impairment charges of
$6.8 billion and $417 million for the three-month
periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and
$12.4 billion and $884 million for the six-month
periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Also
includes gains (losses) from hedging activities that did not
qualify for hedge accounting treatment under FAS 133,
including the related foreign exchange gains and losses. For the
three-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the
effect was $272 million and $(430) million,
respectively. For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008
and 2007, the effect was $(476) million and
$(882) million, respectively. These amounts result
primarily from interest rate and foreign currency derivatives
that are effective economic hedges of investments and
borrowings. |
(b) |
Includes other-than-temporary impairment charges of
$5.2 billion and $324 million for the three-month
periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and
$9.6 billion and $716 million for the six-month
periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
(c) |
Includes gains (losses) from hedging activities that did not
qualify for hedge accounting treatment under FAS 133,
including the related foreign exchange gains and losses. For the
three-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the
effect was $5 million and $(443) million,
respectively. For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008
and 2007, the effect was $(199) million and
$(603) million, respectively. These amounts result
primarily from interest rate and foreign currency derivatives
that are effective economic hedges of investments and
borrowings. |
(d) |
For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30,
2008, includes unrealized market valuation losses of
$5.6 billion and $14.7 billion, respectively, on
AIGFPs super senior credit default swap portfolio. |
|
|
(e) |
Includes net realized capital losses of $464 million and
$1.9 billion for the three- and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2008, respectively, including other-than-temporary
impairment charges of $882 million and $1.9 billion,
respectively. |
(f) |
Includes AIG parent and other operations that are not
required to be reported separately. The following table presents
the operating loss for AIGs Other category: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Six Months | |
|
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
Ended June 30, | |
Other |
|
| |
|
| |
(in millions) |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
| |
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity earnings in partially owned companies
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(452 |
) |
|
|
(302 |
) |
|
|
(820 |
) |
|
|
(554 |
) |
|
Unallocated corporate
expenses(a)
|
|
|
(282 |
) |
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
|
(382 |
) |
|
Net realized capital gains
(losses)(b)
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(235 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
Other miscellaneous, net
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
Total Other
|
|
$ |
(715 |
) |
|
$ |
(460 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,483 |
) |
|
$ |
(930 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Includes expenses of corporate staff not attributable to
specific operating segments, expenses related to efforts to
improve internal controls, corporate initiatives and certain
compensation plan expenses. For the three- and six-month periods
ended June 30, 2008, includes a charge of $101 million
as a result of the settlement of a dispute in connection with
the July 2008 purchase of the balance of Ascot Underwriting
Holdings Ltd., partially offset by a decrease in certain
compensation plan expenses. |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
The increase in net realized capital losses in the six-month
period ended June 30, 2008 reflected higher foreign
exchange losses on foreign-denominated debt, a portion of which
was economically hedged but did not qualify for hedge accounting
treatment under FAS 133, and losses on non-hedged
derivatives. |
11
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(continued)
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
2. |
Segment
Information (continued) |
AIGs General Insurance operations by major internal
reporting unit were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Six Months | |
|
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
Ended June 30, | |
General Insurance |
|
| |
|
| |
(in millions) |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
| |
Total revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Insurance
|
|
$ |
5,937 |
|
|
$ |
6,904 |
|
|
$ |
11,924 |
|
|
$ |
13,995 |
|
|
Transatlantic
|
|
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
1,069 |
|
|
|
2,222 |
|
|
|
2,165 |
|
|
Personal Lines
|
|
|
1,259 |
|
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
|
2,511 |
|
|
|
2,436 |
|
|
Mortgage Guaranty
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
611 |
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
Foreign General Insurance
|
|
|
4,139 |
|
|
|
3,475 |
|
|
|
7,767 |
|
|
|
6,737 |
|
|
Reclassifications and eliminations
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
12,757 |
|
|
$ |
12,928 |
|
|
$ |
25,046 |
|
|
$ |
25,831 |
|
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Insurance
|
|
$ |
381 |
|
|
$ |
1,904 |
|
|
$ |
1,166 |
|
|
$ |
3,833 |
|
|
Transatlantic
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
Personal Lines
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
Mortgage Guaranty
|
|
|
(518 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(872 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
Foreign General Insurance
|
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
1,532 |
|
|
|
1,776 |
|
|
Reclassifications and eliminations
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
827 |
|
|
$ |
2,976 |
|
|
$ |
2,164 |
|
|
$ |
6,072 |
|
|
AIGs Life Insurance & Retirement Services
operations by major internal reporting unit were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Six Months | |
|
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
Ended June 30, | |
Life Insurance & Retirement Services |
|
| |
|
| |
(in millions) |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
| |
Total revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan and Other
|
|
$ |
5,369 |
|
|
$ |
4,863 |
|
|
$ |
9,265 |
|
|
$ |
9,633 |
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
4,575 |
|
|
|
5,019 |
|
|
|
8,852 |
|
|
|
9,510 |
|
|
Domestic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic Life Insurance
|
|
|
1,234 |
|
|
|
2,359 |
|
|
|
2,517 |
|
|
|
4,880 |
|
|
|
Domestic Retirement Services
|
|
|
(1,017 |
) |
|
|
1,782 |
|
|
|
(1,721 |
) |
|
|
3,682 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
10,161 |
|
|
$ |
14,023 |
|
|
$ |
18,913 |
|
|
$ |
27,705 |
|
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan and Other
|
|
$ |
577 |
|
|
$ |
810 |
|
|
$ |
1,060 |
|
|
$ |
1,723 |
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
844 |
|
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
1,215 |
|
|
Domestic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic Life Insurance
|
|
|
(1,005 |
) |
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
(1,875 |
) |
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
Domestic Retirement Services
|
|
|
(2,169 |
) |
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
(3,865 |
) |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
(2,401 |
) |
|
$ |
2,620 |
|
|
$ |
(4,232 |
) |
|
$ |
4,901 |
|
|
AIGs Financial Services operations by major internal
reporting unit were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Six Months | |
|
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
Ended June 30, | |
Financial Services |
|
| |
|
| |
(in millions) |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
| |
Total revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft Leasing
|
|
$ |
1,298 |
|
|
$ |
1,173 |
|
|
$ |
2,463 |
|
|
$ |
2,231 |
|
|
Capital
Markets(a)
|
|
|
(6,088 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(14,831 |
) |
|
|
161 |
|
|
Consumer
Finance(b)
|
|
|
1,028 |
|
|
|
911 |
|
|
|
1,959 |
|
|
|
1,756 |
|
|
Other, including intercompany adjustments
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
(3,605 |
) |
|
$ |
2,123 |
|
|
$ |
(10,165 |
) |
|
$ |
4,324 |
|
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft Leasing
|
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
$ |
207 |
|
|
$ |
555 |
|
|
$ |
371 |
|
|
Capital
Markets(a)
|
|
|
(6,284 |
) |
|
|
(255 |
) |
|
|
(15,211 |
) |
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
Consumer
Finance(b)
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
111 |
|
|
Other, including intercompany adjustments
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
(5,905 |
) |
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
$ |
(14,677 |
) |
|
$ |
339 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Revenues are shown net of interest expense of
$1.2 billion and $805 million in the three-month
periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and
$1.7 billion and $1.9 billion for the six-month
periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. In the
three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008, both
revenues and operating income (loss) includes unrealized market
valuation losses of $5.6 billion and $14.7 billion,
respectively, on AIGFPs super senior credit default swap
portfolio. |
(b) |
The three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2007
included pre-tax charges of $50 million and
$178 million, respectively, in connection with domestic
Consumer Finances mortgage banking activities. Based on a
current evaluation of the estimated cost of implementing the
Supervisory Agreement entered into with the Office of Thrift
Supervision (OTS), partial reversals of these prior year charges
of $25 million and $43 million, respectively, are
included in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30,
2008. |
AIGs Asset Management operations consist of a single
internal reporting unit.
12
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(continued)
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
3. |
Fair Value Measurements |
Effective January 1, 2008 AIG adopted FAS 157 and
FAS 159, which specify measurement and disclosure standards
related to assets and liabilities measured at fair value. See
Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
additional information.
The most significant effect of adopting FAS 157 on
AIGs results of operations for the three- and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2008 related to changes in fair
value methodologies with respect to both liabilities already
carried at fair value, primarily hybrid notes and derivatives,
and newly elected liabilities measured at fair value (see
FAS 159 discussion below). Specifically, the incorporation
of AIGs own credit spreads and the incorporation of
explicit risk margins (embedded policy derivatives at transition
only) resulted in a decrease of $149 million to pre-tax
income ($97 million after tax) and an increase of
$2.6 billion to pre-tax income ($1.7 billion after
tax) for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30,
2008, respectively, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Pre-Tax Increase (Decrease) | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Six Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
Liabilities Carried |
|
Business Segment |
(in millions) |
|
2008 | |
|
2008 | |
|
at Fair Value |
|
Affected |
|
Income statement caption:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized capital gains (losses)
|
|
$ |
(37 |
) |
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
Freestanding derivatives |
|
All segments - excluding AIGFP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
Embedded policy derivatives |
|
Life Insurance & Retirement Services |
|
Unrealized market valuation losses on AIGFP super senior credit
default swap portfolio
|
|
|
44 |
* |
|
|
109 |
* |
|
Super senior credit default swap portfolio |
|
AIGFP |
|
Other income
|
|
|
(156 |
)* |
|
|
2,427 |
* |
|
Notes, GIAs, derivatives, other liabilities |
|
AIGFP |
|
|
|
|
|
Net pre-tax increase
|
|
$ |
(149 |
) |
|
$ |
2,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities already carried at fair value
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
1,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
Newly elected liabilities measured at fair value (FAS 159
elected)
|
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net pre-tax increase
|
|
$ |
(149 |
) |
|
$ |
2,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
The effect of changes in AIGs own credit spreads on
pre-tax income for AIGFP was a decrease of $112 million and
an increase of $2.5 billion for the three- and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2008, respectively. The effect of
the changes in counterparty credit spreads for assets measured
at fair value at AIGFP was decreases in pre-tax income of
$362 million and $3.0 billion for the three- and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2008, respectively. |
Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis
AIG measures at fair value on a recurring basis financial
instruments in its trading and available for sale securities
portfolios, certain mortgage and other loans receivable, certain
spot commodities, derivative assets and liabilities, securities
purchased (sold) under agreements to resell (repurchase),
securities lending invested collateral, non-traded equity
investments and certain private limited partnership and certain
hedge funds included in other invested assets, certain
short-term investments, separate and variable account assets,
certain policyholders contract deposits, securities and
spot commodities sold but not yet purchased, certain trust
deposits and deposits due to banks and other depositors, certain
long-term borrowings, and certain hybrid financial instruments
included in other liabilities. The fair value of a financial
instrument is the amount that would be received to sell an asset
or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date.
The degree of judgment used in measuring the fair value of
financial instruments generally correlates with the level of
pricing observability. Financial instruments with quoted prices
in active markets generally have more pricing observability and
less judgment is used in measuring fair value. Conversely,
financial instruments traded in other-than-active markets or
that do not have quoted prices have less observability and are
measured at fair value using valuation models or other pricing
techniques that require more judgment. Pricing observability is
affected by a number of factors, including the type of financial
instrument, whether the financial instrument is new to the
market and not yet established, the characteristics specific to
the transaction and general market conditions.
Fixed Maturity Securities Trading and Available
for Sale
AIG maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use
of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Whenever
available, AIG obtains quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets at the balance sheet date to measure at fair
value fixed maturity securities in its trading and available for
sale portfolios. Market price data generally is obtained from
exchange or dealer markets.
AIG estimates the fair value of fixed maturity securities not
traded in active markets, including securities purchased
(sold) under agreements to resell (repurchase), and
mortgage and other loans receivable for which AIG elected the
fair value option, by referring to traded securities with
similar attributes, using dealer quotations, a matrix pricing
methodology, discounted cash flow analyses or internal valuation
models. This methodology considers such factors as the
issuers industry, the securitys rating and tenor,
its coupon rate, its position in the capital structure of the
issuer, yield curves, credit curves, prepayment rates and other
relevant factors. For fixed maturity instruments that are not
traded in active markets or that are subject to transfer
restrictions, valuations are adjusted to reflect illiquidity
and/or non-transferability, and such adjustments generally are
based on avail-
13
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(continued)
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
3. |
Fair Value
Measurements (continued) |
able market evidence. In the absence of such evidence,
managements best estimate is used.
Equity Securities Traded in Active Markets
Trading and Available for Sale
AIG maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use
of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Whenever
available, AIG obtains quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets at the balance sheet date to measure at fair
value marketable equity securities in its trading and available
for sale portfolios. Market price data generally is obtained
from exchange or dealer markets.
Non-Traded Equity Investments Other Invested
Assets
AIG initially estimates the fair value of equity instruments not
traded in active markets by reference to the transaction price.
This valuation is adjusted only when changes to inputs and
assumptions are corroborated by evidence such as transactions in
similar instruments, completed or pending third-party
transactions in the underlying investment or comparable
entities, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalizations and
other transactions across the capital structure, offerings in
the equity capital markets, and changes in financial ratios or
cash flows. For equity securities that are not traded in active
markets or that are subject to transfer restrictions, valuations
are adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability
and such adjustments generally are based on available market
evidence. In the absence of such evidence, managements
best estimate is used.
Private Limited Partnership and Hedge Fund
Investments Other Invested Assets
AIG initially estimates the fair value of investments in certain
private limited partnerships and certain hedge funds by
reference to the transaction price. Subsequently, AIG obtains
the fair value of these investments generally from net asset
value information provided by the general partner or manager of
the investments, the financial statements of which generally are
audited annually.
Separate and Variable Account Assets
Separate and variable account assets are composed primarily of
registered and unregistered open-end mutual funds that generally
trade daily and are measured at fair value in the manner
discussed above for equity securities traded in active markets.
Freestanding Derivatives
Derivative assets and liabilities can be exchange-traded or
traded over the counter (OTC). AIG generally values
exchange-traded derivatives using quoted prices in active
markets for identical derivatives at the balance sheet date.
OTC derivatives are valued using market transactions and other
market evidence whenever possible, including market-based inputs
to models, model calibration to market clearing transactions,
broker or dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources with
reasonable levels of price transparency. When models are used,
the selection of a particular model to value an OTC derivative
depends on the contractual terms of, and specific risks inherent
in, the instrument as well as the availability of pricing
information in the market. AIG generally uses similar models to
value similar instruments. Valuation models require a variety of
inputs, including contractual terms, market prices and rates,
yield curves, credit curves, measures of volatility, prepayment
rates and correlations of such inputs. For OTC derivatives that
trade in liquid markets, such as generic forwards, swaps and
options, model inputs can generally be corroborated by
observable market data by correlation or other means, and model
selection does not involve significant management judgment.
Certain OTC derivatives trade in less liquid markets with
limited pricing information, and the determination of fair value
for these derivatives is inherently more difficult. When AIG
does not have corroborating market evidence to support
significant model inputs and cannot verify the model to market
transactions, the transaction price is initially used as the
best estimate of fair value. Accordingly, when a pricing model
is used to value such an instrument, the model is adjusted so
the model value at inception equals the transaction price.
Subsequent to initial recognition, AIG updates valuation inputs
when corroborated by evidence such as similar market
transactions, third-party pricing services and/or broker or
dealer quotations, or other empirical market data. When
appropriate, valuations are adjusted for various factors such as
liquidity, bid/offer spreads and credit considerations. Such
adjustments are generally based on available market evidence. In
the absence of such evidence, managements best estimate is
used.
With the adoption of FAS 157 on January 1, 2008,
AIGs own credit risk has been considered and is
incorporated into the fair value measurement of all freestanding
derivative liabilities.
Embedded Policy Derivatives
The fair value of embedded policy derivatives contained in
certain variable annuity and equity-indexed annuity and life
contracts is measured based on actuarial and capital market
assumptions related to projected cash flows over the expected
lives of the contracts. These cash flow estimates primarily
include benefits and related fees assessed, when applicable, and
incorporate expectations about policyholder behavior. Estimates
of future policyholder behavior are subjective and based
primarily on AIGs historical experience. With respect to
embedded policy derivatives in AIGs variable annuity
contracts, because of the dynamic and complex nature of the
14
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(continued)
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
3. |
Fair Value
Measurements (continued) |
expected cash flows, risk neutral valuations are used.
Estimating the underlying cash flows for these products involves
many estimates and judgments, including those regarding expected
market rates of return, market volatility, correlations of
market index returns to funds, fund performance, discount rates
and policyholder behavior. With respect to embedded policy
derivatives in AIGs equity-indexed annuity and life
contracts, option pricing models are used to estimate fair
value, taking into account assumptions for future equity index
growth rates, volatility of the equity index, future interest
rates, and determinations on adjusting the participation rate
and the cap on equity indexed credited rates in light of market
conditions and policyholder behavior assumptions. With the
adoption of FAS 157, these methodologies were not changed,
with the exception of incorporating an explicit risk margin to
take into consideration market participant estimates of
projected cash flows and policyholder behavior.
AIGFPs Super Senior Credit Default Swap Portfolio
AIGFP values its credit default swaps written on the most senior
risk layers (super senior) of designated pools of debt
securities or loans using internal valuation models, third-party
prices and market indices. The specific valuation methodologies
vary based on the nature of the referenced obligations and
availability of market prices. AIGFP uses a modified version of
the Binomial Expansion Technique (BET) model to value its
credit default swap portfolio written on super senior tranches
of collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) of asset-backed
securities (ABS), including maturity-shortening puts that allow
the holders of the securities issued by certain CDOs to treat
the securities as short-term eligible
2a-7 investments under
the Investment Company Act of 1940
(2a-7 Puts). The BET
model uses default probabilities derived from credit spreads
implied from prices for the individual securities included in
the underlying collateral pools securing the CDOs, as well as
diversity scores, weighted average lives, recovery rates and
discount rates. Prices for the individual securities held by a
CDO are obtained in most cases from the CDO collateral managers,
to the extent available. The CDO collateral managers obtain
these prices from various sources, which include dealer
quotations, third party pricing services and in-house valuation
models. To the extent there is a lag in the prices provided by
the collateral managers, AIGFP rolls forward these prices to the
end of the quarter using data provided by a third-party pricing
service. Where a price for an individual security is not
provided by the CDO collateral manager, AIGFP derives the price
from a matrix that averages the prices of the various securities
at the level of ABS category, vintage and the rating of the
reference security. The determination of some of these inputs
requires the use of judgment and estimates, particularly in the
absence of market observable data. AIGFP also employs a Monte
Carlo simulation to assist in quantifying the effect on the
valuation of the CDOs of the unique aspects of the CDOs
structures such as triggers that divert cash flows to the most
senior part of the capital structure. In the determination of
fair value, AIGFP also considers prices from collateral calls by
counterparties to these transactions and the price estimates for
the super senior CDO securities provided by third parties.
In the case of credit default swaps written on investment-grade
corporate debt and collateralized loan obligations (CLOs), AIGFP
estimates the value of its obligations by reference to the
relevant market indices or third-party quotes on the underlying
super senior tranches when available.
In the case of credit default swaps written to facilitate
regulatory capital relief for AIGFPs European financial
institution counterparties, AIGFP estimates the fair value of
these derivatives by considering observable market transactions,
including the early termination of these transactions by
counterparties, and other market data, to the extent relevant.
Policyholders Contract Deposits
Policyholders contract deposits accounted for at fair
value beginning January 1, 2008 are measured using an
income approach by taking into consideration the following
factors:
|
|
|
Current policyholder account values and related surrender
charges, |
|
|
The present value of estimated future cash inflows (policy fees)
and outflows (benefits and maintenance expenses) associated with
the product using risk neutral valuations, incorporating
expectations about policyholder behavior, market returns and
other factors, and |
|
|
A risk margin that market participants would require for a
market return and the uncertainty inherent in the model inputs. |
The change in fair value of these policyholders contract
deposits is recorded as incurred policy losses and benefits in
the consolidated statement of income (loss).
Fair Value Measurements on a Non-Recurring Basis
AIG also measures the fair value of certain assets on a
non-recurring basis, generally quarterly, annually, or when
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of the asset may not be recoverable. These assets include
held to maturity securities, cost and equity-method investments,
life settlement contracts, flight equipment, collateral securing
foreclosed loans and real estate and other fixed assets,
goodwill, and other intangible assets. AIG uses a variety of
techniques to measure the fair value of these assets when
appropriate, as described below:
|
|
|
Held to Maturity Securities, Cost and Equity-Method
Investments: When AIG determines the carrying value of these
assets may not be recoverable, AIG records the assets |
15
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(continued)
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
3. |
Fair Value
Measurements (continued) |
at fair value with the loss recognized in income. In such
cases, AIG measures the fair value of these assets using the
techniques discussed above for fixed maturities and equity
securities.
|
|
|
Life Settlement Contracts: AIG measures the fair value of
individual life settlement contracts (which are included in
other invested assets) whenever the carrying value plus the
undiscounted future costs that are expected to be incurred to
keep the life settlement contract in force exceed the expected
proceeds from the contract. In those situations, the fair value
is determined on a discounted cash flows basis, incorporating
current life expectancy assumptions. The discount rate
incorporates current information about market interest rates,
the credit exposure to the insurance company that issued the
life settlement contract and AIGs estimate of the risk
margin an investor in the contracts would require. |
|
|
Flight Equipment Primarily Under Operating Leases: When
AIG determines the carrying value of its commercial aircraft may
not be recoverable, AIG records the aircraft at fair value with
the loss recognized in income. AIG measures the fair value of
its commercial aircraft using an income approach based on the
present value of all cash flows from existing and projected
lease payments (based on historical experience and current
expectations of market participants) including net contingent
rentals for the period extending to the end of the
aircrafts economic life in its highest and best use
configuration, plus its disposition value. |
|
|
Collateral Securing Foreclosed Loans and Real Estate and
Other Fixed Assets: When AIG takes collateral in connection
with foreclosed loans, AIG generally bases its estimate of fair
value on the price that would be received in a current
transaction to sell the asset by itself. |
|
|
Goodwill: AIG tests goodwill for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount
of goodwill may not be recoverable, but at least annually. When
AIG determines goodwill may be impaired, AIG uses techniques
that consider market-based earnings multiples of the units
peer companies or discounted cash flow techniques based on the
price that could be received in a current transaction to sell
the asset assuming the asset would be used with other assets as
a group (in-use premise). |
|
|
Intangible Assets: AIG tests its intangible assets for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
the carrying amount of an intangible asset may not be
recoverable. AIG measures the fair value of intangible assets
based on an in-use premise that considers the same factors used
to estimate the fair value of its real estate and other fixed
assets under an in-use premise discussed above. |
See Notes 1(c), (d), (e), (t), and (v) to Consolidated
Financial Statements included in the 2007 Annual Report on
Form 10-K for
additional information about how AIG tests various asset classes
for impairment.
Fair Value Hierarchy
Beginning January 1, 2008, assets and liabilities recorded
at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet are measured and
classified in a hierarchy for disclosure purposes consisting of
three levels based on the observability of inputs
available in the marketplace used to measure the fair values as
discussed below:
|
|
|
Level 1: Fair value measurements that are quoted
prices (unadjusted) in active markets that AIG has the ability
to access for identical assets or liabilities. Market price data
generally is obtained from exchange or dealer markets. AIG does
not adjust the quoted price for such instruments. Assets and
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and
classified as Level 1 include certain government and agency
securities, actively traded listed common stocks and derivative
contracts, most separate account assets and most mutual funds. |
|
|
Level 2: Fair value measurements based on inputs
other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are
observable for the asset or liability, either directly or
indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for
similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs
other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or
liability, such as interest rates and yield curves that are
observable at commonly quoted intervals. Assets and liabilities
measured at fair value on a recurring basis and classified as
Level 2 generally include certain government securities,
most investment-grade and high-yield corporate bonds, certain
asset-backed securities, certain listed equities, state,
municipal and provincial obligations, hybrid securities, mutual
fund and hedge fund investments, derivative contracts,
guaranteed investment agreements at AIGFP and physical
commodities. |
|
|
Level 3: Fair value measurements based on valuation
techniques that use significant inputs that are unobservable.
These measurements include circumstances in which there is
little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. In
certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall
into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such
cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the
fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based
on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value
measurement in its entirety. AIGs assessment of the
significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement
in its entirety requires judgment. In |
16
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(continued)
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
3. |
Fair Value
Measurements (continued) |
making the assessment, AIG considers factors specific to the
asset or liability. Assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a recurring basis and classified as Level 3
include certain distressed ABS, structured credit products,
certain derivative contracts (including AIGFPs super
senior credit default swap portfolio), policyholders
contract deposits carried at fair value, private equity and real
estate fund investments, and direct private equity investments.
AIGs non-financial-instrument assets that are measured at
fair value on a non-recurring basis generally are classified as
Level 3.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring
Basis
The following table presents information about assets and
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at
June 30, 2008, and indicates the level of the fair value
measurement based on the levels of the inputs used:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Total | |
|
|
Counterparty | |
|
June 30, | |
(in millions) |
|
Level 1 | |
|
Level 2 | |
|
Level 3 | |
|
Netting | |
|
2008 | |
| |
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds available for sale
|
|
$ |
3,986 |
|
|
$ |
370,850 |
|
|
$ |
18,480 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
393,316 |
|
|
Bond trading securities
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
8,605 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,801 |
|
|
Common stocks available for sale
|
|
|
16,812 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,306 |
|
|
Common and preferred stocks trading
|
|
|
21,510 |
|
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,514 |
|
|
Preferred stocks available for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,238 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,496 |
|
|
Mortgage and other loans receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
745 |
|
|
Financial Services assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,205 |
|
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
1,276 |
|
|
|
30,214 |
|
|
|
3,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,170 |
|
|
|
Spot commodities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on swaps, options and forward transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,493 |
|
|
|
3,625 |
|
|
|
(51,570 |
) |
|
|
11,548 |
|
|
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,597 |
|
|
Securities lending invested
collateral(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,595 |
|
|
|
8,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,084 |
|
|
Other invested
assets(b)
|
|
|
2,643 |
|
|
|
7,588 |
|
|
|
11,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,099 |
|
|
Short-term
investments(c)
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
24,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,167 |
|
|
Separate and variable accounts
|
|
|
69,162 |
|
|
|
3,061 |
|
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,401 |
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
4,611 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
(2,606 |
) |
|
|
2,452 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
115,525 |
|
|
$ |
570,908 |
|
|
$ |
48,734 |
|
|
$ |
(54,176 |
) |
|
$ |
680,991 |
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
Policyholders contract deposits
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,179 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,179 |
|
|
Other policyholders funds
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Financial Services liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,298 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,338 |
|
|
|
Securities and spot commodities sold but not yet purchased
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
3,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,189 |
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on swaps, options and forward
transactions(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,897 |
|
|
|
30,299 |
|
|
|
(58,964 |
) |
|
|
24,232 |
|
|
|
Trust deposits and deposits due to banks and other depositors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,150 |
|
|
|
2,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,839 |
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
7,005 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
(194 |
) |
|
|
6,861 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
$ |
122,685 |
|
|
$ |
37,251 |
|
|
$ |
(59,158 |
) |
|
$ |
100,880 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Amounts exclude short-term investments that are carried at
cost, which approximates fair value of $10.4 billion. |
|
(b) |
Approximately 13 percent of the fair value of the assets
recorded as Level 3 relates to various private equity, real
estate, hedge fund and
fund-of-funds
investments. AIGs ownership in these funds represented
22 percent, or $1.4 billion of the Level 3
amount. |
|
|
(c) |
Level 2 includes short-term investments that are carried
at cost, which approximates fair value of $23.1 billion. |
|
|
(d) |
Included in Level 3 are unrealized market valuation
losses of $26.1 billion on AIGFP super senior credit
default swap portfolio. |
At June 30, 2008, Level 3 assets totaled
$48.7 billion, representing 4.7 percent of total
assets, and Level 3 liabilities totaled $37.3 billion,
representing 3.8 percent of total liabilities.
17
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(continued)
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
3. |
Fair Value
Measurements (continued) |
The following tables present changes during the three- and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 in Level 3
assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis, and the realized and unrealized gains (losses) recorded
in income during the three- and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2008 related to the Level 3 assets and
liabilities that remained on the consolidated balance sheet at
June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Net | |
|
|
|
Changes in | |
|
|
Realized and | |
|
|
|
Unrealized Gains | |
|
|
Unrealized | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Purchases, | |
|
|
|
(Losses) on | |
|
|
Balance | |
|
Gains (Losses) | |
|
Other | |
|
Sales, | |
|
|
|
Balance at | |
|
Instruments | |
|
|
Beginning of | |
|
Included | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Issuances and | |
|
Transfers | |
|
June 30, | |
|
Held at | |
(in millions) |
|
Period(a) | |
|
in Income(b) | |
|
Income (Loss) | |
|
Settlements-net | |
|
In (Out) | |
|
2008 | |
|
June 30, 2008 | |
| |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds available for sale
|
|
$ |
17,198 |
|
|
$ |
(679 |
) |
|
$ |
(58 |
) |
|
$ |
(34 |
) |
|
$ |
2,053 |
|
|
$ |
18,480 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Bond trading securities
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
Common stocks available for sale
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common and preferred stocks trading
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stocks available for sale
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage and other loans receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Services assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
3,419 |
|
|
|
(472 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
3,680 |
|
|
|
(361 |
) |
|
Securities lending invested collateral
|
|
|
9,622 |
|
|
|
(1,346 |
) |
|
|
908 |
|
|
|
(590 |
) |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
8,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other invested assets
|
|
|
11,348 |
|
|
|
(153 |
) |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
11,868 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
Separate and variable accounts
|
|
|
1,065 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
43,808 |
|
|
$ |
(2,664 |
) |
|
$ |
930 |
|
|
$ |
746 |
|
|
$ |
2,270 |
|
|
$ |
45,090 |
|
|
$ |
(198 |
) |
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
Policyholders contract deposits
|
|
$ |
(4,118 |
) |
|
$ |
129 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
(203 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(4,179 |
) |
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
Financial Services liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
(220 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on swaps, options and forward transactions, net
|
|
|
(20,860 |
) |
|
|
(5,679 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(240 |
) |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
(26,674 |
) |
|
|
(5,496 |
) |
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
|
(2,838 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(2,689 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
52 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
(28,110 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,546 |
) |
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
(283 |
) |
|
$ |
320 |
|
|
$ |
(33,607 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,393 |
) |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds available for sale
|
|
$ |
18,786 |
|
|
$ |
(1,444 |
) |
|
$ |
(550 |
) |
|
$ |
(224 |
) |
|
$ |
1,912 |
|
|
$ |
18,480 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Bond trading securities
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
Common stocks available for sale
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common and preferred stocks trading
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stocks available for sale
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage and other loans receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Services assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
4,422 |
|
|
|
(1,433 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
702 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
3,680 |
|
|
|
(1,233 |
) |
|
Securities lending invested collateral
|
|
|
11,353 |
|
|
|
(3,138 |
) |
|
|
1,087 |
|
|
|
(818 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
8,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other invested assets
|
|
|
10,373 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
11,868 |
|
|
|
818 |
|
|
Separate and variable accounts
|
|
|
1,003 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
46,893 |
|
|
$ |
(5,827 |
) |
|
$ |
692 |
|
|
$ |
1,171 |
|
|
$ |
2,161 |
|
|
$ |
45,090 |
|
|
$ |
(398 |
) |
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
Policyholders contract deposits
|
|
$ |
(3,674 |
) |
|
$ |
(57 |
) |
|
$ |
(51 |
) |
|
$ |
(397 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(4,179 |
) |
|
$ |
(221 |
) |
|
Financial Services liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
(208 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on swaps, options and forward transactions, net
|
|
|
(11,718 |
) |
|
|
(14,562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(429 |
) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(26,674 |
) |
|
|
(14,693 |
) |
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
|
(3,578 |
) |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
(2,689 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(503 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
28 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
(19,681 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,604 |
) |
|
$ |
(51 |
) |
|
$ |
310 |
|
|
$ |
419 |
|
|
$ |
(33,607 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,885 |
) |
|
|
|
(a) |
Certain recharacterizations of amounts previously reported in
Level 3 were identified in the second quarter of 2008, and
have been adjusted. The effect of these reclassifications and
recharacterizations on Level 3 net assets were net decreases of
$1.8 billion and $1.0 billion at January 1, 2008
and March 31, 2008, respectively. The Consolidated
Statement of Income, the Consolidated Balance Sheet, and the
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows presented in the 2008 |
18
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(continued)
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
3. |
Fair Value
Measurements (continued) |
|
|
|
first quarter
Form 10-Q were not
affected by these changes. Total Level 3 derivative
exposures have been netted on these tables for presentation
purposes only. |
(b) |
Net realized and unrealized
gains and losses shown above are reported on the consolidated
statement of income (loss) primarily as follows: |
|
|
|
|
Major category of Assets/ Liabilities |
|
Consolidated Statement of Income (Loss) Line Items |
|
Financial Services assets and liabilities
|
|
Other income |
|
|
Unrealized market valuation losses on AIGFP super
senior credit default swap portfolio |
Other invested assets
|
|
Net realized capital gains (losses) |
Policyholders contract deposits
|
|
Incurred policy losses and benefits |
|
|
Net realized capital gains (losses) |
19
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(continued)
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
3. |
Fair Value
Measurements (continued) |
Both observable and unobservable inputs may be used to determine
the fair values of positions classified in Level 3 in the
tables above. As a result, the unrealized gains (losses) on
instruments held at June 30, 2008 may include changes in
fair value that were attributable to both observable (e.g.,
changes in market interest rates) and unobservable inputs (e.g.,
changes in unobservable long-dated volatilities).
AIG uses various hedging techniques to manage risks associated
with certain positions, including those classified within
Level 3. Such techniques may include the purchase or sale
of financial instruments that are classified within Level 1
and/or Level 2. As a result, the realized and unrealized
gains (losses) for assets and liabilities classified within
Level 3 presented in the table above do not reflect the
related realized or unrealized gains (losses) on hedging
instruments that are classified within Level 1 and/or
Level 2.
Changes in the fair value of separate and variable account
assets are completely offset in the consolidated statement of
income (loss) by changes in separate and variable account
liabilities, which are not carried at fair value and therefore
not included in the foregoing tables.
Fair Value Measured on a Non-Recurring Basis
At June 30, 2008, AIG had assets measured at fair value on
a non-recurring basis on which it recorded impairment charges
totaling $107 million during the six-month period ended
June 30, 2008. These charges included a $45 million
write-off of goodwill related to the Mortgage Guaranty reporting
unit; a $49 million impairment charge on real estate owned,
real estate loans held for sale and other intangible assets for
American General Finance, Inc.; and impairment charges on other
assets of $13 million.
Fair Value Option
FAS 159 permits a company to choose to measure at fair
value many financial instruments and certain other assets and
liabilities that are not required to be measured at fair value.
Subsequent changes in fair value for designated items are
required to be reported in income. Unrealized gains and losses
on financial instruments in AIGs insurance businesses and
in AIGFP for which the fair value option was elected under
FAS 159 are classified in incurred policy losses and
benefits and in other income, respectively, in the consolidated
statement of income (loss).
20
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(continued)
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
3. |
Fair Value
Measurements (continued) |
The following table presents the gains or losses recorded
during the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008
related to the eligible instruments for which AIG elected the
fair value option and the related transition adjustment recorded
as a decrease to opening shareholders equity at
January 1,
2008(a):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Gain (Loss) | |
|
Gain (Loss) | |
|
|
January 1, | |
|
Transition | |
|
January 1, | |
|
Three Months | |
|
Six Months | |
|
|
2008 | |
|
Adjustment | |
|
2008 | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
prior to | |
|
upon | |
|
after | |
|
June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
(in millions) |
|
Adoption | |
|
Adoption | |
|
Adoption | |
|
2008 | |
|
2008 | |
| |
Mortgage and other loans receivable
|
|
$ |
1,109 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,109 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
79 |
|
Financial Services
assets(b):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities (formerly available for sale)
|
|
|
39,278 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
39,283 |
|
|
|
(718 |
) |
|
|
(1,151 |
) |
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
|
|
|
20,950 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
20,951 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
575 |
|
Other invested assets
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
6,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,969 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
1,147 |
|
|
|
(1,147 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
(435 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future policy benefits for life, accident and health insurance
contracts
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policyholders contract
deposits(c)
|
|
|
3,739 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
3,379 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
Financial Services
liabilities(b):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
6,750 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
6,760 |
|
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
(416 |
) |
|
Securities and spot commodities sold but not yet purchased
|
|
|
3,797 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
3,807 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
Trust deposits and deposits due to banks and other depositors
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
Long-term borrowings
|
|
|
57,968 |
|
|
|
(675 |
) |
|
|
58,643 |
|
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
(391 |
) |
Other liabilities
|
|
|
1,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,792 |
|
|
|
(286 |
) |
|
|
(319 |
) |
|
Total gain (loss) for the three- and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(206 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,450 |
) |
Pre-tax cumulative effect of adopting the fair value option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,638 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of adopting the fair value option
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,112 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Certain of AIGs financial instruments are required to
be accounted for at fair value, with changes in fair value
included in earnings, under FAS 115, Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, or
FAS 133 and are not included in the table above. |
(b) |
AIGFP elected to apply the fair value option to all eligible
assets and liabilities (other than equity method investments,
trade receivables and trade payables) because electing the fair
value option will allow AIGFP to more closely align its earnings
with the economics of its transactions by recognizing
concurrently through earnings the change in fair value of its
derivatives and the offsetting change in fair value of the
assets and liabilities being hedged as well as the manner in
which the business is evaluated by management. Substantially all
of the gain (loss) amounts shown above are reported in other
income on the consolidated statement of income (loss). |
(c) |
AIG elected to apply the fair value option to certain single
premium variable life products in Japan and an investment-linked
life insurance product sold principally in Asia, both classified
within policyholders contract deposits in the consolidated
balance sheet. AIG elected the fair value option for these
liabilities to more closely align its accounting with the
economics of its transactions. For the investment-linked product
sold principally in Asia, the election will more effectively
align changes in the fair value of assets with a commensurate
change in the fair value of policyholders liabilities. For
the single premium life products in Japan, the fair value option
election will allow AIG to economically hedge the inherent
market risks associated with this business in an efficient and
effective manner through the use of derivative instruments. The
hedging program, which was initiated in the second quarter of
2008, results in an accounting presentation for this business
that more closely reflects the underlying economics and the way
the business is managed, with the change in the fair value of
derivatives and underlying assets largely offsetting the change
in fair value of the policy liabilities. AIG did not elect the
fair value option for other liabilities classified in
policyholders contract deposits because other contracts do
not share the same contract features that created the disparity
between the accounting presentation and the economic
performance. |
Interest income and expense and dividend income on assets and
liabilities elected under the fair value option are recognized
and classified in the consolidated statement of income (loss)
depending on the nature of the instrument and related market
conventions. At AIGFP, interest and dividends and interest
expense are included in other income. Otherwise, interest and
dividends are included in net investment income in the
consolidated statement of income (loss). See Note 1(a) to
the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the 2007
Annual Report on
Form 10-K for
additional information about AIGs policies for
recognition, measurement, and disclosure of interest and
dividend income and interest expense.
During the three- and six-month periods ended June 30,
2008, AIG recognized a loss of $169 million and a gain of
$1.3 billion, respectively, attributable to the observable
effect of changes in credit spreads on AIGs own
liabilities for which the fair value option was elected. AIG
calculates the effect of these credit spread changes using
discounted cash flow techniques that incorporate current market
interest rates, AIGs ob-
21
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(continued)
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
3. Fair Value
Measurements (continued)
servable credit spreads on these liabilities and other factors
that mitigate the risk of nonperformance such as collateral
posted.
The following table presents the difference between fair
values and the aggregate contractual principal amounts of
mortgage and other loans receivable and long-term borrowings,
for which the fair value option was elected:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Principal | |
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at | |
|
Amount | |
|
|
|
|
June 30, | |
|
Due Upon | |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
2008 | |
|
Maturity | |
|
Difference | |
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage and other loans receivable
|
|
$ |
745 |
|
|
$ |
716 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
$ |
48,176 |
|
|
$ |
47,168 |
|
|
$ |
1,008 |
|
|
At June 30, 2008, there were no mortgage and other loans
receivable for which the fair value option was elected, that
were 90 days or more past due and in non-accrual status.
|
|
4. |
Shareholders Equity and Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
Shareholders Equity
From time to time, AIG may buy shares of its common stock for
general corporate purposes, including to satisfy its obligations
under various share-based employee compensation plans. In
February 2007, AIGs Board of Directors increased
AIGs share repurchase program by authorizing the purchase
of shares with an aggregate purchase price of $8 billion.
In November 2007, AIGs Board of Directors authorized the
purchase of an additional $8 billion in common stock. In
2007, AIG entered into structured share repurchase arrangements
providing for the purchase of shares over time with an aggregate
purchase price of $7 billion.
A total of 37,926,059 shares were purchased during the
first six months of 2008 to meet commitments that existed at
December 31, 2007. At August 5, 2008, $9 billion
was available for purchases under the aggregate authorization.
AIG does not expect to purchase additional shares under its
share repurchase program for the foreseeable future.
The quarterly dividend per common share declared in May 2008 and
payable on September 19, 2008 is $0.22.
In May 2008, AIG sold 196,710,525 shares of common stock at a
price per share of $38 for gross proceeds of $7.47 billion
and 78,400,000 equity units at a price per unit of $75 for gross
proceeds of $5.88 billion. The equity units, the key terms
of which are summarized below, are recorded as
long-term borrowings on
the consolidated balance sheet.
Equity Units
Each equity unit has an initial stated amount of $75 and
consists of a stock purchase contract issued by AIG and,
initially, a
1/40th
or 2.5 percent undivided beneficial ownership interest in
three series of junior subordinated debentures
(Series B-1, B-2
and B-3), each with a principal amount of $1,000.
Each stock purchase contract requires its holder to purchase,
and requires AIG to sell, a variable number of shares of AIG
common stock for $25 in cash on each of the following dates:
February 15, 2011, May 1, 2011 and August 1,
2011. The number of shares that AIG is obligated to deliver on
each stock purchase date is set forth in the chart below (where
the applicable market value is an average of the
trading prices of AIGs common stock over the
20-trading-day period ending on the third business day prior to
the relevant stock purchase date).
|
|
|
If the applicable market |
|
|
value is: |
|
then AIG is obligated to issue: |
|
|
|
Greater than or equal to $45.60
|
|
0.54823 shares per stock purchase contract |
Between $45.60 and $38.00
|
|
Shares equal to $25 divided by the applicable
market value |
Less than or equal to $38.00
|
|
0.6579 shares per stock purchase contract |
Basic earnings (loss) per share (EPS) will not be affected
by outstanding stock purchase contracts. Diluted EPS will be
determined considering the potential dilution from outstanding
stock purchase contracts using the treasury stock method, and
therefore diluted EPS will not be affected by outstanding stock
purchase contracts until the applicable market value exceeds
$45.60.
AIG is obligated to pay quarterly contract adjustment payments
to the holders of the stock purchase contracts, at an initial
annual rate of 2.7067 percent applied to the stated amount.
The present value of the contract adjustment payments,
$431 million, was recognized at inception as a liability (a
component of other liabilities), and was recorded as a reduction
to additional paid-in capital.
In addition to the stock purchase contracts, as part of the
equity units, AIG issued $1.96 billion of each of the
Series B-1, B-2
and B-3 junior subordinated debentures, which initially pay
interest at rates of 5.67 percent, 5.82 percent and
5.89 percent, respectively. For accounting purposes, AIG
allocated the proceeds of the equity units between the stock
purchase contracts and the junior subordinated debentures on a
relative fair value basis. AIG determined that the fair value of
the stock purchase contract at issuance was zero, and therefore
all of the proceeds were allocated to the junior subordinated
debentures.
22
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(continued)
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
4. |
Shareholders Equity and Earnings (Loss) Per
Share (continued) |
Share-based Employee Compensation Plans
During the first quarter of 2008, AIG reviewed the vesting
schedules of its share-based employee compensation plans, and on
March 11, 2008, AIGs management and the Compensation
and Management Resources Committee of AIGs Board of
Directors determined that, to fulfill the objective of
attracting and retaining high quality personnel, the vesting
schedules of certain awards outstanding under these plans and
all awards made in the future under these plans should be
shortened.
For accounting purposes, a modification of the terms or
conditions of an equity award is treated as an exchange of the
original award for a new award. As a result of this
modification, the incremental compensation cost related to the
affected awards totaled $24 million and will, together with
the unamortized originally-measured compensation cost, be
amortized over shorter periods. AIG estimates the modifications
will increase the amortization of this cost by $106 million
and $46 million in 2008 and 2009, respectively, with a
related reduction in amortization expense of $128 million
in 2010 through 2013.
In the second quarter of 2008, reversals of previously accrued
costs related to certain performance-based compensation plans
were made, as performance to date is below the performance
thresholds set forth in those plans.
Earnings (Loss) Per Share (EPS)
Basic EPS is based on the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding, adjusted to reflect all stock dividends and
stock splits. Diluted EPS is based on those shares used in basic
EPS plus shares that would have been outstanding assuming
issuance of common shares for all dilutive potential common
shares outstanding, adjusted to reflect all stock dividends and
stock splits.
The computation of basic and diluted EPS was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Six Months | |
|
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
(in millions, except per share data) |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
| |
Numerator for EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(5,357 |
) |
|
$ |
4,277 |
|
|
$ |
(13,162 |
) |
|
$ |
8,407 |
|
|
Denominator for EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding used in the computation of
EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued
|
|
|
2,850 |
|
|
|
2,751 |
|
|
|
2,808 |
|
|
|
2,751 |
|
|
|
Common stock in treasury
|
|
|
(258 |
) |
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
(247 |
) |
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
Deferred shares
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
2,605 |
|
|
|
2,602 |
|
|
|
2,575 |
|
|
|
2,607 |
|
Incremental shares arising from awards outstanding under
share-based employee compensation plans*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted*
|
|
|
2,605 |
|
|
|
2,613 |
|
|
|
2,575 |
|
|
|
2,621 |
|
|
EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
(2.06 |
) |
|
$ |
1.64 |
|
|
$ |
(5.11 |
) |
|
$ |
3.22 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
(2.06 |
) |
|
$ |
1.64 |
|
|
$ |
(5.11 |
) |
|
$ |
3.21 |
|
|
|
|
* |
Calculated using the treasury stock method. Certain potential
common shares arising from share-based employee compensation
plans were not included in the computation of diluted EPS
because the effect would have been antidilutive. The number of
potential shares excluded was 7 million for the six-month
period ended 2007. |
According to the Schedule 13D filed on March 20, 2007
by C.V. Starr & Co., Inc. (Starr), Starr International
Company, Inc. (SICO), Edward E. Matthews, Maurice R. Greenberg,
the Maurice R. and Corinne P. Greenberg Family Foundation, Inc.,
the Universal Foundation, Inc., the Maurice R. and Corinne P.
Greenberg Joint Tenancy Company, LLC and the C.V.
Starr & Co., Inc. Trust, these reporting persons could
be considered to beneficially own 354,987,261 shares of
AIGs common stock at that date. Based on the shares of
AIGs common stock outstanding at July 31, 2008, this
ownership would represent approximately 13 percent of the
voting stock of AIG. Although these reporting persons have made
filings under Section 16 of the Exchange Act, reporting
sales of shares of common stock, no amendment to the
Schedule 13D has been filed to report a change in ownership
subsequent to March 20, 2007.
|
|
6. |
Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees |
|
|
(a) |
Litigation and Investigations |
AIG and its subsidiaries, in common with the insurance and
financial services industries in general, are subject to
litigation, including claims for punitive damages, in the normal
course of their business. At the current time, AIG cannot
predict the outcome of the matters described below, or estimate
any potential additional costs related to these matters, unless
otherwise indicated. In AIGs insurance operations,
litigation arising from claims settlement activities is
generally considered in the establishment of AIGs reserve
for losses
23
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(continued)
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
6. |
Commitments, Contingencies and
Guarantees (continued) |
and loss expenses. However, the potential for increasing jury
awards and settlements makes it difficult to assess the ultimate
outcome of such litigation.
Various federal, state and foreign regulatory and governmental
agencies are reviewing certain public disclosures, transactions
and practices of AIG and its subsidiaries in connection with
industry wide and other inquiries. These reviews include the
inquiries by the SEC and U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ),
previously confirmed by AIG, with respect to AIGs
valuation of and disclosures relating to the AIGFP super senior
credit default swap portfolio. AIG has cooperated, and will
continue to cooperate, in producing documents and other
information in response to subpoenas and other requests. In
connection with some of the SEC investigations, AIG understands
that some of its employees have received Wells notices and it is
possible that additional current and former employees could
receive similar notices in the future. Under SEC procedures, a
Wells notice is an indication that the SEC staff has made a
preliminary decision to recommend enforcement action that
provides recipients with an opportunity to respond to the SEC
staff before a formal recommendation is finalized.
In the opinion of AIG management, AIGs ultimate liability
for the unresolved litigation and investigation matters referred
to below is not likely to have a material adverse effect on
AIGs consolidated financial condition, although it is
possible that the effect would be material to AIGs
consolidated results of operations for an individual reporting
period.
Litigation Relating to AIGFPs Super Senior Credit
Default Swap Portfolio
Securities Actions Southern District of New
York. On May 21, 2008, a purported securities fraud
class action complaint was filed against AIG and certain of its
current and former officers and directors in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York (the
Southern District of New York). The complaint alleges that
defendants made statements during the period May 11, 2007
through May 9, 2008 in press releases, the Companys
quarterly and year-end filings and during conference calls with
analysts which were materially false and misleading and which
artificially inflated the price of the Companys stock. The
alleged false and misleading statements relate to, among other
things, unrealized market valuation losses on AIGFPs super
senior credit default swap portfolio as a result of severe
credit market disruption. The complaint alleges claims under
Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act. Three
additional purported securities class action complaints were
subsequently filed in the Southern District of New York, all
containing similar allegations. One of the additional complaints
filed on June 19, 2008, alleges a purported class period of
November 10, 2006 through June 6, 2008. The Court has
not yet appointed a lead plaintiff in these actions.
ERISA Actions Southern District of New
York. On June 25, 2008, the Company, certain of its
executive officers and directors, and unnamed members of the
Companys Retirement Board and Investment Committee were
named as defendants in two nearly identical separate actions
filed in the Southern District of New York. The actions purport
to be brought as class actions on behalf of all participants in
or beneficiaries of certain pension plans sponsored by AIG or
its subsidiaries (the Plans) during the period May 11, 2007
to June 25, 2008 and whose participant accounts included
investments in the Companys common stock. Plaintiffs
allege, among other things, that the defendants breached their
fiduciary responsibilities to Plan participants and their
beneficiaries under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974, as amended (ERISA), by: (i) failing to prudently
and loyally manage the Plans and the Plans assets;
(ii) failing to provide complete and accurate information
to participants and beneficiaries about the Company and the
value of the Companys stock; (iii) failing to monitor
appointed Plan fiduciaries and to provide them with complete and
accurate information; and (iv) breach of the duty to avoid
conflicts of interest. The alleged ERISA violations relate to,
among other things, the defendants purported failure to
monitor and/or disclose unrealized market valuation losses on
AIGFPs super senior credit default swap portfolio as a
result of severe credit market disruption. Three additional
purported ERISA class action complaints were subsequently filed
in the Southern District of New York, both containing similar
allegations. It is anticipated that these actions will all be
consolidated and that the Court will then appoint a lead
plaintiff in the consolidated action.
Derivative Actions Southern District of New
York. On November 20, 2007, two purported
shareholder derivative actions were filed in the Southern
District of New York naming as defendants the then current
directors of AIG and certain senior officers of AIG and its
subsidiaries. Plaintiffs assert claims for breach of fiduciary
duty, waste of corporate assets and unjust enrichment, as well
as violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and
Rule 10b-5
promulgated thereunder, and Section 20(a) of the Exchange
Act, among other things, in connection with AIGs public
disclosures regarding its exposure to what the lawsuits describe
as the subprime market crisis. The actions were consolidated as
In re American International Group, Inc. 2007 Derivative
Litigation (the 2007 Derivative Litigation). On
February 15, 2008, plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended
complaint alleging the same causes of action. On April 15,
2008, motions to dismiss the action were filed on behalf of all
defendants.
On June 9, 2008, a purported shareholder derivative action
was filed in the Southern District of New York assert-
24
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(continued)
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
6. |
Commitments, Contingencies and
Guarantees (continued) |
ing claims on behalf of AIG based generally on the same
allegations as in the consolidated amended complaint in the 2007
Derivative Litigation. On June 10, 2008, the clerk of the
court was informed that the action should be consolidated with
the 2007 Derivative Litigation.
Derivative Action Supreme Court of New
York. On February 29, 2008, a purported shareholder
derivative complaint was filed in the Supreme Court of Nassau
County, asserting the same state law claims against the same
defendants as in the consolidated amended complaint in the 2007
Derivative Litigation. On May 19, 2008, defendants filed a
motion to dismiss or to stay the proceedings in light of the
pending 2007 Derivative Litigation.
Action by the Starr Foundation Supreme Court
of New York. On May 7, 2008, the Starr Foundation
filed a complaint in New York State Supreme Court against AIG,
AIGs former Chief Executive Officer, Martin Sullivan, and
AIGs Chief Financial Officer, Steven Bensinger, asserting
a claim for common law fraud. The complaint alleges that the
defendants made materially misleading statements and omissions
concerning alleged multi-billion dollar losses in AIGs
portfolio of credit default swaps. The complaint asserts that if
the Starr Foundation had known the truth about the alleged
losses, it would have sold its remaining shares of AIG stock.
The complaint alleges that the Starr Foundation has suffered
damages of at least $300 million. On May 30, 2008, a
motion to dismiss the complaint was filed on behalf of
defendants.
2006 Regulatory Settlements and Related Matters
2006 Regulatory Settlements. In February 2006, AIG
reached a resolution of claims and matters under investigation
with the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), the SEC, the
Office of the New York Attorney General (NYAG) and the New
York State Department of Insurance (DOI). AIG recorded an
after-tax charge of $1.15 billion relating to these
settlements in the fourth quarter of 2005. The settlements
resolved investigations conducted by the SEC, NYAG and DOI in
connection with the accounting, financial reporting and
insurance brokerage practices of AIG and its subsidiaries, as
well as claims relating to the underpayment of certain workers
compensation premium taxes and other assessments. These
settlements did not, however, resolve investigations by
regulators from other states into insurance brokerage practices
related to contingent commissions and other broker-related
conduct, such as alleged bid rigging. Nor did the settlements
resolve any obligations that AIG may have to state guarantee
funds in connection with any of these matters.
As a result of these settlements, AIG made payments or placed
amounts in escrow in 2006 totaling approximately
$1.64 billion, $225 million of which represented fines
and penalties. Amounts held in escrow totaling
$334 million, including interest thereon, are included in
other assets at June 30, 2008. At that date, all of the
funds were escrowed for settlement of claims resulting from the
underpayment by AIG of its residual market assessments for
workers compensation.
In addition to the escrowed funds, $800 million was
deposited into a fund under the supervision of the SEC as part
of the settlements to be available to resolve claims asserted
against AIG by investors, including the securities class action
shareholder lawsuits described below.
Also, as part of the settlements, AIG agreed to retain, for a
period of three years, an independent consultant to conduct a
review that will include, among other things, the adequacy of
AIGs internal control over financial reporting, the
policies, procedures and effectiveness of AIGs regulatory,
compliance and legal functions and the remediation plan that AIG
has implemented as a result of its own internal review.
Other Regulatory Settlements. AIGs 2006
regulatory settlements with the SEC, DOJ, NYAG and DOI did not
resolve investigations by regulators from other states into
insurance brokerage practices. AIG entered into agreements
effective January 29, 2008 with the Attorneys General of
the States of Florida, Hawaii, Maryland, Michigan, Oregon, Texas
and West Virginia; the Commonwealths of Massachusetts and
Pennsylvania; and the District of Columbia; as well as the
Florida Department of Financial Services and the Florida Office
of Insurance Regulation, relating to their respective industry
wide investigations into producer compensation and insurance
placement practices. The settlements call for total payments of
$12.5 million to be allocated among the ten jurisdictions
representing restitution to state agencies and reimbursement of
the costs of the investigation. During the term of the
settlement agreements, AIG will continue to maintain certain
producer compensation disclosure and ongoing compliance
initiatives. AIG will also continue to cooperate with the
industry wide investigations. The agreement with the Texas
Attorney General also settles allegations of anticompetitive
conduct relating to AIGs relationship with Allied World
Assurance Company and includes an additional settlement payment
of $500,000 related thereto.
AIG entered into an agreement effective March 13, 2008 with
the Pennsylvania Insurance Department relating to the
Departments investigation into the affairs of AIG and
certain of its Pennsylvania-domiciled insurance company
subsidiaries. The settlement calls for total payments of
approximately $13.5 million, of which approximately
$4.4 million was paid under previous settlement agreements.
During the term of the settlement agreement, AIG will provide
annual reinsurance
25
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(continued)
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
6. |
Commitments, Contingencies and
Guarantees (continued) |
reports, as well as maintain certain producer compensation
disclosure and ongoing compliance initiatives.
NAIC Examination of Workers Compensation Premium
Reporting. During 2006, the Settlement Review Working
Group of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners
(NAIC), under the direction of the states of Indiana, Minnesota
and Rhode Island, began an investigation into the underreporting
of workers compensation premiums. In late 2007, the
Settlement Review Working Group recommended that a multi-state
targeted market conduct examination focusing on workers
compensation insurance be commenced under the direction of the
NAICs Market Analysis Working Group. AIG was informed of
the multi-state targeted market conduct examination in January
2008. AIG has been advised that the lead states in the
multi-state examination are Delaware, Florida, Indiana,
Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, Pennsylvania, and Rhode
Island and that all other states (and the District of Columbia)
have agreed to participate. AIG has also been advised that the
examination will focus on both legacy issues and AIGs
current compliance with legal requirements applicable to
AIGs writing and reporting of workers compensation
insurance, but as of July 31, 2008 no determinations had
been made with respect to these issues.
Securities Action Southern District of New
York. Beginning in October 2004, a number of putative
securities fraud class action suits were filed in the Southern
District of New York against AIG and consolidated as In re
American International Group, Inc. Securities Litigation.
Subsequently, a separate, though similar, securities fraud
action was also brought against AIG by certain Florida pension
funds. The lead plaintiff in the class action is a group of
public retirement systems and pension funds benefiting Ohio
state employees, suing on behalf of themselves and all
purchasers of AIGs publicly traded securities between
October 28, 1999 and April 1, 2005. The named
defendants are AIG and a number of present and former AIG
officers and directors, as well as Starr, SICO, General
Reinsurance Corporation (General Re), and PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP (PwC), among others. The lead plaintiff alleges, among other
things, that AIG: (1) concealed that it engaged in
anti-competitive conduct through alleged payment of contingent
commissions to brokers and participation in illegal bid-rigging;
(2) concealed that it used income smoothing
products and other techniques to inflate its earnings;
(3) concealed that it marketed and sold income
smoothing insurance products to other companies; and
(4) misled investors about the scope of government
investigations. In addition, the lead plaintiff alleges that
AIGs former Chief Executive Officer, Maurice R. Greenberg,
manipulated AIGs stock price. The lead plaintiff asserts
claims for violations of Sections 11 and 15 of the
Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act
and Rule 10b-5
promulgated thereunder, Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act,
and Section 20A of the Exchange Act. In April 2006, the
court denied the defendants motions to dismiss the second
amended class action complaint and the Florida complaint. In
December 2006, a third amended class action complaint was filed,
which does not differ substantially from the prior complaint.
Fact and class discovery is currently ongoing. On
February 20, 2008, the lead plaintiff filed a motion for
class certification. On June 9, 2008, the lead plaintiff
filed a motion for leave to amend its complaint to include
allegations related to unrealized market valuation losses on
AIGFPs super senior credit default swap portfolio. On
July 17, 2008, the Court denied lead plaintiffs
motion for leave to amend.
ERISA Action Southern District of New
York. Between November 30, 2004 and July 1,
2005, several ERISA actions were filed in the Southern District
of New York on behalf of purported class participants and
beneficiaries of three pension plans sponsored by AIG or its
subsidiaries. A consolidated complaint filed on
September 26, 2005 alleges a class period between
September 30, 2000 and May 31, 2005 and names as
defendants AIG, the members of AIGs Retirement Board and
the Administrative Boards of the plans at issue, and present or
former members of AIGs Board of Directors. The factual
allegations in the complaint are essentially identical to those
in the securities actions described above. The parties have
reached an agreement to settle this matter for an amount within
AIGs insurance coverage limits. On July 3, 2008, the
Court granted preliminary approval of the settlement. The Court
has scheduled a hearing on final settlement approval for
October 7, 2008.
Derivative Action Southern District of New
York. Between October 25, 2004 and July 14,
2005, seven separate derivative actions were filed in the
Southern District of New York, five of which were consolidated
into a single action (the New York 2004/2005 Derivative
Litigation). The complaint in this action contains nearly the
same types of allegations made in the securities fraud action
described above. The named defendants include current and former
officers and directors of AIG, as well as Marsh &
McLennan Companies, Inc. (Marsh), SICO, Starr, ACE Limited and
subsidiaries (ACE), General Re, PwC, and certain employees or
officers of these entity defendants. Plaintiffs assert claims
for breach of fiduciary duty, gross mismanagement, waste of
corporate assets, unjust enrichment, insider selling, auditor
breach of contract, auditor professional negligence and
disgorgement from AIGs former Chief Executive Officer,
Maurice R. Greenberg, and former Chief Financial Officer, Howard
I. Smith, of incentive-based compensation and AIG share proceeds
under Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, among others.
Plaintiffs seek, among other things, compensatory damages,
corporate governance reforms, and a voiding of the election of
26
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(continued)
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
6. |
Commitments, Contingencies and
Guarantees (continued) |
certain AIG directors. AIGs Board of Directors has
appointed a special committee of independent directors (special
committee) to review the matters asserted in the operative
consolidated derivative complaint. The court has entered an
order staying this action pending resolution of the Delaware
2004/2005 Derivative Litigation discussed below. The court also
has entered an order that termination of certain named
defendants from the Delaware action applies to this action
without further order of the court. On October 17, 2007,
plaintiffs and those AIG officer and director defendants against
whom the shareholder plaintiffs in the Delaware action are no
longer pursuing claims filed a stipulation providing for all
claims in this action against such defendants to be dismissed
with prejudice. Former directors and officers Maurice R.
Greenberg and Howard I. Smith have asked the court to refrain
from so ordering this stipulation.
Derivative Actions Delaware Chancery
Court. From October 2004 to April 2005, AIG shareholders
filed five derivative complaints in the Delaware Chancery Court.
All of these derivative lawsuits were consolidated into a single
action as In re American International Group, Inc. Consolidated
Derivative Litigation (the Delaware 2004/2005 Derivative
Litigation). The amended consolidated complaint named 43
defendants (not including nominal defendant AIG) who, as in the
New York 2004/2005 Derivative Litigation, were current and
former officers and directors of AIG, as well as other entities
and certain of their current and former employees and directors.
The factual allegations, legal claims and relief sought in this
action are similar to those alleged in the New York 2004/2005
Derivative Litigation, except that the claims are only under
state law. Earlier in 2007, the court approved an agreement that
AIG be realigned as plaintiff, and, on June 13, 2007,
acting on the direction of the special committee, AIG filed an
amended complaint against former directors and officers Maurice
R. Greenberg and Howard I. Smith, alleging breach of fiduciary
duty and indemnification. Also on June 13, 2007, the
special committee filed a motion to terminate the litigation as
to certain defendants, while taking no action as to others.
Defendants Greenberg and Smith filed answers to AIGs
complaint and brought third-party complaints against certain
current and former AIG directors and officers, PwC and
Regulatory Insurance Services, Inc. On September 28, 2007,
AIG and the shareholder plaintiffs filed a combined amended
complaint in which AIG continued to assert claims against
defendants Greenberg and Smith and took no position as to the
claims asserted by the shareholder plaintiffs in the remainder
of the combined amended complaint. In that pleading, the
shareholder plaintiffs are no longer pursuing claims against
certain AIG officers and directors. On February 12, 2008,
the court granted AIGs motion to stay discovery pending
the resolution of claims against AIG in the New York
consolidated securities action. The court also directed the
parties to coordinate a briefing schedule for the motions to
dismiss. On April 11, 2008, the shareholder plaintiffs
filed the First Amended Combined Complaint, which added claims
against former AIG directors and officers Maurice Greenberg,
Edward Matthews, and Thomas Tizzio for breach of fiduciary duty
based on alleged bid-rigging in the municipal derivatives
market. On April 15, 2008, shareholder plaintiffs submitted
a stipulation dismissing former AIG director and officer, Evan
Greenberg, without prejudice. On June 13, 2008, certain
defendants filed motions to dismiss the shareholder
plaintiffs portions of the complaint.
AIG is also named as a defendant in a derivative action in the
Delaware Chancery Court brought by shareholders of Marsh. On
July 10, 2008, shareholder plaintiffs filed a second
consolidated amended complaint, which contains claims against
AIG for aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty and
contribution and indemnification in connection with alleged
bid-rigging and steering practices in the commercial insurance
market.
Policyholder Antitrust and RICO Actions.
Commencing in 2004, policyholders brought multiple federal
antitrust and Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act
(RICO) class actions in jurisdictions across the nation
against insurers and brokers, including AIG and a number of its
subsidiaries, alleging that the insurers and brokers engaged in
a broad conspiracy to allocate customers, steer business, and
rig bids. These actions, including 24 complaints filed in
different federal courts naming AIG or an AIG subsidiary as a
defendant, were consolidated by the judicial panel on
multi-district litigation and transferred to the United States
District Court for the District of New Jersey for coordinated
pretrial proceedings. The consolidated actions have proceeded in
that court in two parallel actions, In re Insurance Brokerage
Antitrust Litigation (the Commercial Complaint) and In re
Employee Benefit Insurance Brokerage Antitrust Litigation (the
Employee Benefits Complaint, and, together with the Commercial
Complaint, the multi-district litigation).
The plaintiffs in the Commercial Complaint are a group of
corporations, individuals and public entities that contracted
with the broker defendants for the provision of insurance
brokerage services for a variety of insurance needs. The broker
defendants are alleged to have placed insurance coverage on the
plaintiffs behalf with a number of insurance companies
named as defendants, including AIG subsidiaries. The Commercial
Complaint also named various brokers and other insurers as
defendants (three of which have since settled). The Commercial
Complaint alleges, among other things, that defendants engaged
in a widespread conspiracy to allocate customers through
bid-rigging and steering prac-
27
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(continued)
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
6. |
Commitments, Contingencies and
Guarantees (continued) |
tices. Plaintiffs assert that the defendants violated the
Sherman Antitrust Act, RICO, and the antitrust laws of
48 states and the District of Columbia, and are liable
under common law breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment
theories. Plaintiffs seek treble damages plus interest and
attorneys fees as a result of the alleged RICO and Sherman
Antitrust Act violations.
The plaintiffs in the Employee Benefits Complaint are a group of
individual employees and corporate and municipal employers
alleging claims on behalf of two separate nationwide purported
classes: an employee class and an employer class that acquired
insurance products from the defendants from August 26, 1994
to the date of any class certification. The Employee Benefits
Complaint names AIG, as well as various other brokers and
insurers, as defendants. The activities alleged in the Employee
Benefits Complaint, with certain exceptions, track the
allegations made in the Commercial Complaint.
The Court in connection with the Commercial Complaint granted
(without leave to amend) defendants motions to dismiss the
federal antitrust and RICO claims on August 31, 2007 and
September 28, 2007, respectively. The court declined to
exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims in
the Commercial Complaint and therefore dismissed it in its
entirety. On January 14, 2008, the court granted
defendants motion for summary judgment on the ERISA claims
in the Employee Benefits Complaint and subsequently dismissed
the remaining state law claims without prejudice, thereby
dismissing the Employee Benefits Complaint in its entirety. On
February 12, 2008, plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to
the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit with
respect to the dismissal of the Employee Benefits Complaint.
Plaintiffs previously appealed the dismissal of the Commercial
Complaint to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third
Circuit on October 10, 2007. On July 2, 2008, the
Third Circuit stayed all proceedings in both appeals pending
resolution in the district court of joint motions for approval
of class plaintiffs settlement with the Marsh defendants.
On July 10, 2008, appellants filed a motion to vacate the
stay, which was granted on July 30, 2008. On July 31,
2008, the Third Circuit informed the parties that oral argument
in both appeals had been tentatively scheduled for
April 20, 2009.
A number of complaints making allegations similar to those in
the multi-district litigation have been filed against AIG and
other defendants in state and federal courts around the country.
The defendants have thus far been successful in having the
federal actions transferred to the District of New Jersey and
consolidated into the multi-district litigation. These
additional consolidated actions are still pending in the
District Court, but are currently stayed pending a decision by
the court on whether they will proceed during the appeal of the
dismissal of the multi-district litigation. The AIG defendants
have also sought to have state court actions making similar
allegations stayed pending resolution of the multi-district
litigation proceeding. These efforts have generally been
successful, although plaintiffs in one case pending in Texas
state court have moved to re-open discovery; a hearing on that
motion was held on April 9, 2008 at which the court
deferred ruling on the motion until defendants file their
Special Exceptions. AIG has recently settled several of the
various federal and state actions alleging claims similar to
those in the multi-district litigation, including a state court
action pending in Florida in which discovery had been allowed to
proceed.
Ohio Attorney General Action Ohio Court of
Common Pleas. On August 24, 2007, the Ohio Attorney
General filed a complaint in the Ohio Court of Common Pleas
against AIG and a number of its subsidiaries, as well as several
other broker and insurer defendants, asserting violation of
Ohios antitrust laws. The complaint, which is similar to
the Commercial Complaint, alleges that AIG and the other broker
and insurer defendants conspired to allocate customers, divide
markets, and restrain competition in commercial lines of
casualty insurance sold through the broker defendant. The
complaint seeks treble damages on behalf of Ohio public
purchasers of commercial casualty insurance, disgorgement on
behalf of both public and private purchasers of commercial
casualty insurance, as well as a $500 per day penalty for
each day of conspiratorial conduct. AIG, along with other
co-defendants, moved to dismiss the complaint on
November 16, 2007. On June 30, 2008, the Court denied
defendants motion to dismiss.
Action Relating to Workers Compensation Premium
Reporting Northern District of Illinois. On
May 24, 2007, the National Workers Compensation Reinsurance
Pool (the NWCRP), on behalf of its participant members, filed a
lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern
District of Illinois against AIG with respect to the
underpayment by AIG of its residual market assessments for
workers compensation. The complaint alleges claims for
violations of RICO, breach of contract, fraud and related state
law claims arising out of AIGs alleged underpayment of
these assessments between 1970 and the present and seeks damages
purportedly in excess of $1 billion. On August 6,
2007, the court denied AIGs motion seeking to dismiss or
stay the complaint or, in the alternative, to transfer to the
Southern District of New York. On December 26, 2007, the
court denied AIGs motion to dismiss the complaint. On
March 17, 2008, AIG filed an amended answer, counterclaims
and third-party claims against NCCI (in its capacity as
attorney-in-fact for
the NWCRP), the NWCRP, its board members, and certain of the
other insurance companies that are members of the
28
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(continued)
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
6. |
Commitments, Contingencies and
Guarantees (continued) |
NWCRP alleging violations of RICO, as well as claims for
conspiracy, fraud, and other state law claims. The counterclaim-
and third-party defendants filed motions to dismiss on
June 9, 2008. The motions are scheduled for decision on
November 20, 2008. Discovery is currently ongoing while the
motions are pending.
Action Relating to Workers Compensation Premium
Reporting Minnesota. On February 16,
2006, the Attorney General of the State of Minnesota filed a
complaint against AIG with respect to claims by the Minnesota
Department of Revenue and the Minnesota Special Compensation
Fund, alleging that AIG made false statements and reports to
Minnesota agencies and regulators, unlawfully reducing
AIGs contributions and payments to Minnesota and certain
state funds relating to its workers compensation premiums.
While AIG settled that litigation in December 2007, a similar
lawsuit was filed by the Minnesota Workers Compensation
Reinsurance Association and the Minnesota Workers Compensation
Insurers Association in the United States District Court for the
District of Minnesota. On March 28, 2008, the court granted
AIGs motion to dismiss the case in its entirety. On
April 25, 2008, plaintiffs appealed to the United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit and also filed a new
complaint making similar allegations in Minnesota state court.
On April 30, 2008, substantially identical claims were also
filed in Minnesota state court by the Minnesota Insurance
Guaranty Association and Minnesota Assigned Risk Plan.
Action Relating to Workers Compensation Premium
Reporting District of South Carolina. A
purported class action was also filed in the United States
District Court for the District of South Carolina on
January 25, 2008 against AIG and certain of its
subsidiaries, on behalf of a class of employers that obtained
workers compensation insurance from AIG companies and
allegedly paid inflated premiums as a result of AIGs
alleged underreporting of workers compensation premiums.
An amended complaint in the South Carolina action was filed on
March 24, 2008, and AIG filed a motion to dismiss the
amended complaint on April 21, 2008. On July 8, 2008,
the South Carolina court granted AIGs motion to dismiss
all claims without prejudice and granted plaintiff leave to
refile subject to certain conditions.
Litigation Relating to SICO and Starr
SICO Action. In July, 2005 SICO filed a complaint
against AIG in the Southern District of New York, claiming that
AIG had refused to provide SICO access to certain artwork, and
asking the court to order AIG immediately to release the
property to SICO. AIG filed an answer denying SICOs
allegations and setting forth defenses to SICOs claims. In
addition, AIG filed counterclaims asserting breach of contract,
unjust enrichment, conversion, breach of fiduciary duty, a
constructive trust and declaratory judgment, relating to
SICOs breach of its commitment to use its AIG shares only
for the benefit of AIG and AIG employees. On June 23, 2008,
the Court denied in part and granted in part SICOs motion
for summary judgment, and on July 31, 2008 the parties
submitted a joint pre-trial order.
Derivative Action Relating to Starr and SICO. On
December 31, 2002, a derivative lawsuit was filed in the
Delaware Chancery Court against twenty directors and executives
of AIG as well as against AIG as a nominal defendant that
alleges, among other things, that the directors of AIG breached
the fiduciary duties of loyalty and care by approving the
payment of commissions to insurance managing general agencies
owned by Starr and of rental and service fees to SICO and the
executives breached their duty of loyalty by causing AIG to
enter into contracts with Starr and SICO and their fiduciary
duties by usurping AIGs corporate opportunities. The
complaint further alleges that the Starr agencies did not
provide any services that AIG was not capable of providing
itself, and that the diversion of commissions to these entities
was solely for the benefit of Starrs owners. The complaint
also alleges that the service fees and rental payments made to
SICO and its subsidiaries were improper. Under the terms of a
stipulation approved by the court on February 16, 2006, the
claims against the outside independent directors were dismissed
with prejudice, while the claims against the other directors
were dismissed without prejudice. In an opinion dated
June 21, 2006, the Court denied defendants motion to
dismiss, except with respect to plaintiffs challenge to
payments made to Starr before January 1, 2000. On
July 21, 2006, plaintiff filed its second amended
complaint, which alleges that, between January 1, 2000 and
May 31, 2005, individual defendants breached their duty of
loyalty by causing AIG to enter into contracts with Starr and
SICO and breached their fiduciary duties by usurping AIGs
corporate opportunity. Starr is charged with aiding and abetting
breaches of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment for its
acceptance of the fees. SICO is no longer named as a defendant.
On June 27, 2007, Starr filed a cross-claim against AIG,
alleging one count that includes contribution, unjust enrichment
and setoff. On November 15, 2007, the court granted
AIGs motion to dismiss the cross-claim by Starr to the
extent that it sought affirmative relief from AIG. On
February 14, 2008, the court granted a motion to add former
AIG officer Thomas Tizzio as a defendant. As a result, the
remaining defendants in the case are AIG (the nominal
defendant), Starr and former directors and officers Maurice
Greenberg, Howard Smith, Edward Matthews and Thomas Tizzio.
Trial is currently scheduled to begin in September 2008.
29
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(continued)
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
6. |
Commitments, Contingencies and
Guarantees (continued) |
Litigation Matters Relating to AIGs General
Insurance Operations
Caremark. AIG and certain of its subsidiaries have
been named defendants in two putative class actions in state
court in Alabama that arise out of the 1999 settlement of class
and derivative litigation involving Caremark Rx, Inc.
(Caremark). The plaintiffs in the second-filed action have
intervened in the first-filed action, and the second-filed
action has been dismissed. An excess policy issued by a
subsidiary of AIG with respect to the 1999 litigation was
expressly stated to be without limit of liability. In the
current actions, plaintiffs allege that the judge approving the
1999 settlement was misled as to the extent of available
insurance coverage and would not have approved the settlement
had he known of the existence and/or unlimited nature of the
excess policy. They further allege that AIG, its subsidiaries,
and Caremark are liable for fraud and suppression for
misrepresenting and/or concealing the nature and extent of
coverage. In addition, the intervenor-plaintiffs allege that
various lawyers and law firms who represented parties in the
underlying class and derivative litigation (the Lawyer
Defendants) are also liable for fraud and suppression,
misrepresentation, and breach of fiduciary duty. The complaints
filed by the plaintiffs and the intervenor-plaintiffs request
compensatory damages for the 1999 class in the amount of
$3.2 billion, plus punitive damages. AIG and its
subsidiaries deny the allegations of fraud and suppression and
have asserted that information concerning the excess policy was
publicly disclosed months prior to the approval of the
settlement. AIG and its subsidiaries further assert that the
current claims are barred by the statute of limitations and that
plaintiffs assertions that the statute was tolled cannot
stand against the public disclosure of the excess coverage. The
plaintiffs and intervenor-plaintiffs, in turn, have asserted
that the disclosure was insufficient to inform them of the
nature of the coverage and did not start the running of the
statute of limitations. On November 26, 2007, the trial
court issued an order that dismissed the intervenors
complaint against the Lawyer Defendants and entered a final
judgment in favor of the Lawyer Defendants. The intervenors are
appealing the dismissal of the Lawyer Defendants and on
January 2, 2008, requested a stay of all trial court
proceedings pending the appeal. On March 4, 2008, the trial
court granted the motion for a stay. No further proceedings at
the trial court level will occur until the appeal of the
dismissal of the Lawyer Defendants is resolved. AIG cannot
reasonably estimate either the likelihood of its prevailing in
these actions or the potential damages in the event liability is
determined.
Gunderson. A subsidiary of AIG has been named as a
defendant in a putative class action lawsuit in the
14th Judicial District Court for the State of Louisiana.
The complaint alleges failure to comply with certain provisions
of the Louisiana Any Willing Provider Act relating to discounts
taken by defendants on bills submitted by Louisiana medical
providers and hospitals that provided treatment or services to
workers compensation claimants and seeks monetary penalties and
injunctive relief. On January 25, 2008, plaintiffs and the
AIG subsidiary agreed to resolve the lawsuit on a class-wide
basis for approximately $29 million. On May 29, 2008,
the court entered a Final Order and Judgment, approving the
settlement and fully and finally resolving the litigation.
Flight Equipment
At June 30, 2008, International Lease Finance Corporation
(ILFC) had committed to purchase 179 new aircraft
deliverable from 2008 through 2019 at an estimated aggregate
purchase price of $17.6 billion. ILFC will be required to
find customers for any aircraft acquired, and it must arrange
financing for portions of the purchase price of such equipment.
ILFC ordered 74 Boeing 787 aircraft with the first aircraft now
scheduled to be delivered in late 2011. Boeing has made several
announcements concerning the delays in the deliveries of the
787s. Boeing has informed ILFC that its 787 deliveries will
be delayed
19-30 months with
an average delay in excess of 27 months per aircraft and
span across ILFCs entire order, with the original
contracted deliveries running from 2010 through 2017.
Other Commitments
In the normal course of business, AIG enters into commitments to
invest in limited partnerships, private equities, hedge funds
and mutual funds and to purchase and develop real estate in the
U.S. and abroad. These commitments totaled $8.7 billion at
June 30, 2008.
On June 27, 2005, AIG entered into an agreement pursuant to
which AIG agreed, subject to certain conditions, to make any
payment that is not promptly paid with respect to the benefits
accrued by certain employees of AIG and its subsidiaries under
the SICO Plans (as discussed below under Benefits Provided
by Starr International Company, Inc. and C.V. Starr &
Co., Inc.).
Loss Reserves. Although AIG regularly reviews the
adequacy of the established reserve for losses and loss
expenses, there can be no assurance that AIGs ultimate
loss reserves will not develop adversely and materially exceed
AIGs current loss reserves. Estimation of ultimate net
losses, loss expenses and loss reserves is a complex process for
long-tail casualty lines of business, which include excess and
umbrella liability, directors and officers liability (D&O),
professional liability, medical malpractice, workers
compensation, general liability, products liability and related
classes, as well as for asbes-
30
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(continued)
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
6. |
Commitments, Contingencies and
Guarantees (continued) |
tos and environmental exposures. Generally, actual historical
loss development factors are used to project future loss
development. However, there can be no assurance that future loss
development patterns will be the same as in the past. Moreover,
any deviation in loss cost trends or in loss development factors
might not be discernible for an extended period of time
subsequent to the recording of the initial loss reserve
estimates for any accident year. Thus, there is the potential
for reserves with respect to a number of years to be
significantly affected by changes in loss cost trends or loss
development factors that were relied upon in setting the
reserves. These changes in loss cost trends or loss development
factors could be attributable to changes in inflation, in labor
and material costs or in the judicial environment, or in other
social or economic phenomena affecting claims.
Benefits Provided by Starr International Company, Inc. and
C.V. Starr & Co., Inc. SICO has provided a
series of two-year Deferred Compensation Profit Participation
Plans (SICO Plans) to certain AIG employees. The SICO Plans were
created in 1975 when the voting shareholders and Board of
Directors of SICO, a private holding company whose principal
asset is AIG common stock, decided that a portion of the capital
value of SICO should be used to provide an incentive plan for
the current and succeeding managements of all American
International companies, including AIG.
None of the costs of the various benefits provided under the
SICO Plans has been paid by AIG, although AIG has recorded a
charge to reported earnings for the deferred compensation
amounts paid to AIG employees by SICO, with an offsetting amount
credited to additional paid-in capital reflecting amounts
considered to be contributed by SICO. The SICO Plans provide
that shares currently owned by SICO are set aside by SICO for
the benefit of the participant and distributed upon retirement.
The SICO Board of Directors currently may permit an early payout
of units under certain circumstances. Prior to payout, the
participant is not entitled to vote, dispose of or receive
dividends with respect to such shares, and shares are subject to
forfeiture under certain conditions, including but not limited
to the participants voluntary termination of employment
with AIG prior to normal retirement age. Under the SICO Plans,
SICOs Board of Directors may elect to pay a participant
cash in lieu of shares of AIG common stock. Following
notification from SICO to participants in the SICO Plans that it
will settle specific future awards under the SICO Plans with
shares rather than cash, AIG modified its accounting for the
SICO Plans from variable to fixed measurement accounting. AIG
gave effect to this change in settlement method beginning on
December 9, 2005, the date of SICOs notice to
participants in the SICO Plans.
AIG and certain of its subsidiaries become parties to derivative
financial instruments with market risk resulting from both
dealer and end-user activities to reduce currency, interest
rate, equity and commodity exposures. These instruments are
carried at their fair value in the consolidated balance sheet.
The majority of AIGs derivative activity is transacted by
AIGFP. See Note 8 to the 2007 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
AIG has issued unconditional guarantees with respect to the
prompt payment, when due, of all present and future payment
obligations and liabilities of AIGFP arising from transactions
entered into by AIGFP.
SAI Deferred Compensation Holdings, Inc., a wholly owned
subsidiary of AIG, has established a deferred compensation plan
for registered representatives of certain AIG subsidiaries,
pursuant to which participants have the opportunity to invest
deferred commissions and fees on a notional basis. The value of
the deferred compensation fluctuates with the value of the
deferred investment alternatives chosen. AIG has provided a full
and unconditional guarantee of the obligations of SAI Deferred
Compensation Holdings, Inc. to pay the deferred compensation
under the plan.
31
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(continued)
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
The components of the net periodic benefit cost with respect
to pensions and other postretirement benefits were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Pensions | |
|
Postretirement | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Non-U.S. | |
|
U.S. | |
|
|
|
Non-U.S. | |
|
U.S. | |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Plans | |
|
Plans | |
|
Total | |
|
Plans | |
|
Plans | |
|
Total | |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net loss
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement loss
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Amortization of net loss
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement loss
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net loss
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement loss
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
112 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Amortization of net loss
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement loss
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
Interim Period Tax Assumptions and Effective Tax Rates
AIGs interim period tax expense or benefit is measured
using an estimated annual effective tax rate. To the extent that
a portion of AIGs annual pretax income or loss cannot be
reliably estimated, the actual tax expense or benefit applicable
to that income or loss is reported in the interim period in
which the related income or loss is reported. AIG is unable to
reliably estimate other-than-temporary impairments and the
operating results of AIGFP. Therefore, the related tax effect of
other-than-temporary
impairments, which is calculated at the applicable local
statutory rate (predominantly 35 percent), and the
operating results of AIGFP, which are tax effected at the
U.S. statutory tax rate of 35 percent, are reported as
discrete adjustments to the estimated annual effective tax rate
that AIG applies to all other pretax income.
The effective tax rate on the pre-tax loss for the three-month
period ended June 30, 2008 was 38.4 percent. The
effective tax rate was higher than the statutory rate of 35
32
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(continued)
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
8. |
Federal Income
Taxes (continued) |
percent due primarily to tax benefits from foreign operations
and tax exempt interest. The effective tax rate on the pre-tax
loss for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 was
34.4 percent. The effective tax rate was adversely affected
by $703 million of tax charges from the first three months
of 2008, comprised of increases in the reserves for uncertain
tax positions and other discrete period items. The effective tax
rate on the pre-tax income for the three- and six-month periods
ended June 30, 2007 was 26.5 percent and
27.2 percent, respectively. The effective tax rates were
low, due primarily to benefits from remediation adjustments and
the recognition of tax benefits associated with the SICO Plan
for which the compensation expense was recognized in prior years.
Tax Filings and Examinations
On April 3, 2008, AIG filed a refund claim for tax years
1997 through 2004. The refund claim relates to the tax effect of
the restatement of AIGs 2004 and prior financial
statements.
There has been no material change to the status of the assertion
of additional tax made by the Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) in their Statutory Notice of Deficiency as described
in AIGs Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2008. AIG continues to believe that
it has adequate reserves for any liability that could result
from the IRS actions.
In the second quarter of 2008, three separate court decisions
were rendered relating to certain leasing transactions, which
were adverse to the affected taxpayers. In accordance with
FIN 48 and
FSP 13-2, AIG
evaluated the effect of these decisions on leasing transactions
of AIG subsidiaries and adjusted the timing of cash flows
relating to income taxes generated by the transactions. AIG
recorded a $100 million after-tax charge in the quarter
ended June 30, 2008 as a result of this evaluation.
FIN 48
As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, AIGs
unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties,
were $2.5 billion and $1.3 billion, respectively. As
of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, AIGs
unrecognized tax benefits included $965 million and
$299 million, respectively, related to tax positions the
disallowance of which would not affect the effective tax rate.
Accordingly, as of June 30, 2008 and December 31,
2007, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if
recognized, would favorably affect the effective tax rate was
$1.5 billion and $1.0 billion, respectively.
Substantially all of the increase as of June 30, 2008 was
attributable to the quarter ended March 31, 2008.
At June 30, 2008, AIG had accrued $429 million for the
payment of interest (net of the federal benefit) and penalties.
AIG continually evaluates proposed adjustments by taxing
authorities. At June 30, 2008, such proposed adjustments
would not result in a material change to AIGs consolidated
financial condition, although it is possible that the effect
could be material to AIGs consolidated results of
operations for an individual reporting period. Although it is
reasonably possible that a significant change in the balance of
unrecognized tax benefits may occur within the next twelve
months, at this time it is not possible to estimate the range of
the change due to the uncertainty of the potential outcomes.
33
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(continued)
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
9. |
Information Provided in Connection with Outstanding Debt |
The following condensed consolidating financial statements
reflect the following:
|
|
|
AIG Life Holdings (US), Inc. (AIGLH), formerly known as
American General Corporation, is a holding company and a wholly
owned subsidiary of AIG. AIG provides a full and unconditional
guarantee of all outstanding debt of AIGLH. |
|
|
AIG Liquidity Corp. is a wholly owned subsidiary of AIG. AIG
provides a full and unconditional guarantee of all obligations
of AIG Liquidity Corp. |
|
|
AIG Program Funding, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of
AIG. AIG provides a full and unconditional guarantee of all
obligations of AIG Program Funding, Inc. |
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American | |
|
|
|
|
International | |
|
|
|
AIG | |
|
AIG | |
|
|
|
|
Group, Inc. | |
|
|
|
Liquidity | |
|
Program | |
|
Other | |
|
|
|
Consolidated | |
(in millions) |
|
(As Guarantor) | |
|
AIGLH | |
|
Corp. | |
|
Funding, Inc. | |
|
Subsidiaries | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
AIG | |
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments and Financial Services assets
|
|
$ |
28,453 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
829,778 |
|
|
$ |
(22,669 |
) |
|
$ |
835,602 |
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,229 |
|
|
Carrying value of subsidiaries and partially owned companies, at
equity
|
|
|
91,567 |
|
|
|
19,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,151 |
|
|
|
(129,959 |
) |
|
|
628 |
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
19,511 |
|
|
|
2,608 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189,172 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
211,417 |
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
139,534 |
|
|
$ |
22,517 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,040,327 |
|
|
$ |
(152,502 |
) |
|
$ |
1,049,876 |
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance liabilities
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
557,673 |
|
|
$ |
(108 |
) |
|
$ |
557,565 |
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
47,827 |
|
|
|
2,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,034 |
|
|
|
(20,359 |
) |
|
|
178,638 |
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
13,619 |
|
|
|
2,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220,587 |
|
|
|
(1,712 |
) |
|
|
235,485 |
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
61,446 |
|
|
|
5,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
927,294 |
|
|
|
(22,179 |
) |
|
|
971,688 |
|
|
Preferred shareholders equity in subsidiary companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
78,088 |
|
|
|
17,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,933 |
|
|
|
(130,323 |
) |
|
|
78,088 |
|
|
Total liabilities, preferred shareholders equity in
subsidiary companies and shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
139,534 |
|
|
$ |
22,517 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,040,327 |
|
|
$ |
(152,502 |
) |
|
$ |
1,049,876 |
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments and Financial Services assets
|
|
$ |
14,648 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
849,144 |
|
|
$ |
(21,790 |
) |
|
$ |
842,042 |
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,284 |
|
|
Carrying value of subsidiaries and partially owned companies, at
equity
|
|
|
111,714 |
|
|
|
24,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,542 |
|
|
|
(153,998 |
) |
|
|
654 |
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
9,414 |
|
|
|
2,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191,220 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
203,381 |
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
135,860 |
|
|
$ |
27,029 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,061,105 |
|
|
$ |
(175,633 |
) |
|
$ |
1,048,361 |
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance liabilities
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
534,369 |
|
|
$ |
(75 |
) |
|
$ |
534,337 |
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
36,045 |
|
|
|
2,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156,003 |
|
|
|
(18,135 |
) |
|
|
176,049 |
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
3,971 |
|
|
|
2,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238,362 |
|
|
|
(3,085 |
) |
|
|
242,074 |
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
40,059 |
|
|
|
4,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
928,734 |
|
|
|
(21,295 |
) |
|
|
952,460 |
|
|
Preferred shareholders equity in subsidiary companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
95,801 |
|
|
|
22,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,271 |
|
|
|
(154,338 |
) |
|
|
95,801 |
|
|
Total liabilities, preferred shareholders equity in
subsidiary companies and shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
135,860 |
|
|
$ |
27,029 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,061,105 |
|
|
$ |
(175,633 |
) |
|
$ |
1,048,361 |
|
|
34
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(continued)
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
9. |
Information Provided in Connection with Outstanding
Debt (continued) |
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American | |
|
|
|
|
International | |
|
|
|
AIG | |
|
AIG | |
|
|
|
|
Group, Inc. | |
|
|
|
Liquidity | |
|
Program | |
|
Other | |
|
|
|
Consolidated | |
(in millions) |
|
(As Guarantor) | |
|
AIGLH | |
|
Corp. | |
|
Funding, Inc. | |
|
Subsidiaries | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
AIG | |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(52 |
) |
|
$ |
(20 |
) |
|
$ |
* |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(8,684 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(8,756 |
) |
Equity in undistributed net income of consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
(6,164 |
) |
|
|
(1,729 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income from consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income taxes (benefits)
|
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,218 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,357 |
) |
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(5,357 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,745 |
) |
|
$ |
* |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(5,424 |
) |
|
$ |
7,169 |
|
|
$ |
(5,357 |
) |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(282 |
) |
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
|
$ |
* |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,623 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,328 |
|
Equity in undistributed net income of consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
3,605 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,945 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividend income from consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,097 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income taxes (benefits)
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,679 |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(372 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(372 |
) |
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
4,277 |
|
|
$ |
560 |
|
|
$ |
* |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,482 |
|
|
$ |
(5,042 |
) |
|
$ |
4,277 |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(885 |
) |
|
$ |
(41 |
) |
|
$ |
* |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(19,094 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(20,020 |
) |
Equity in undistributed net income of consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
(13,918 |
) |
|
|
(2,975 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income from consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
1,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,473 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income taxes (benefits)
|
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,719 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,894 |
) |
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(13,162 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,009 |
) |
|
$ |
* |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(12,411 |
) |
|
$ |
15,420 |
|
|
$ |
(13,162 |
) |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(543 |
) |
|
$ |
(86 |
) |
|
$ |
* |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13,129 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12,500 |
|
Equity in undistributed net income of consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
6,849 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,340 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividend income from consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
2,165 |
|
|
|
658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,823 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income taxes (benefits)
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,405 |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(688 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(688 |
) |
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
8,407 |
|
|
$ |
1,070 |
|
|
$ |
* |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,093 |
|
|
$ |
(10,163 |
) |
|
$ |
8,407 |
|
|
*Less than $1 million.
35
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(continued)
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
9. |
Information Provided in Connection with Outstanding
Debt (continued) |
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American | |
|
|
|
|
International | |
|
|
|
AIG | |
|
AIG | |
|
|
|
|
Group, Inc. | |
|
|
|
Liquidity | |
|
Program | |
|
Other | |
|
Consolidated | |
(in millions) |
|
(As Guarantor) | |
|
AIGLH | |
|
Corp. | |
|
Funding, Inc. | |
|
Subsidiaries | |
|
AIG | |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$ |
(594 |
) |
|
$ |
115 |
|
|
$ |
* |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17,068 |
|
|
$ |
16,589 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Invested assets disposed
|
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,738 |
|
|
|
80,341 |
|
|
Invested assets acquired
|
|
|
(2,096 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(87,214 |
) |
|
|
(89,310 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
(11,466 |
) |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,412 |
) |
|
|
(12,994 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(12,959 |
) |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,888 |
) |
|
|
(21,963 |
) |
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of debt
|
|
|
13,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,605 |
|
|
|
55,685 |
|
|
Repayments of debt
|
|
|
(1,912 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54,733 |
) |
|
|
(56,645 |
) |
|
Proceeds from common stock issued
|
|
|
7,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,343 |
|
|
Payments advanced to purchase shares
|
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
Cash dividends paid to shareholders
|
|
|
(1,036 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,036 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
(3,003 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,930 |
|
|
|
927 |
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
13,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,198 |
) |
|
|
5,274 |
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
Change in cash
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
Cash at beginning of period
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,199 |
|
|
|
2,284 |
|
|
Cash at end of period
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
* |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,226 |
|
|
$ |
2,229 |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$ |
(1,076 |
) |
|
$ |
172 |
|
|
$ |
* |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18,335 |
|
|
$ |
17,431 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Invested assets disposed
|
|
|
1,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,139 |
|
|
|
83,907 |
|
|
Invested assets acquired
|
|
|
(6,857 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(99,942 |
) |
|
|
(106,799 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
(2,012 |
) |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,334 |
) |
|
|
(17,422 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(7,101 |
) |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,137 |
) |
|
|
(40,314 |
) |
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of debt
|
|
|
11,958 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,133 |
|
|
|
50,091 |
|
|
Repayments of debt
|
|
|
(790 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,147 |
) |
|
|
(34,937 |
) |
|
Proceeds from common stock issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments advanced to purchase shares
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
Cash dividends paid to shareholders
|
|
|
(859 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(859 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
1,828 |
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,920 |
|
|
|
12,652 |
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
8,137 |
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,906 |
|
|
|
22,947 |
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
Change in cash
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Cash at beginning of period
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,514 |
|
|
|
1,590 |
|
|
Cash at end of period
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
* |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,599 |
|
|
$ |
1,635 |
|
|
*Less than $1 million.
During the second quarter of 2008, AIG made certain revisions to
the American International Group, Inc. (as Guarantor) Condensed
Statement of Cash Flows, primarily relating to the effect of
reclassifying certain intercompany and securities lending
balances. Accordingly, AIG revised the previous period presented
to conform to the revised presentation. There was no effect on
the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows or ending cash balances.
The revisions and their effect on the American International
Group, Inc. (as Guarantor) Condensed Statement of Cash Flows for
the six months ended June 30, 2007 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally Reported | |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
June 30, 2007 | |
|
Revisions | |
|
As Revised | |
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$ |
743 |
|
|
$ |
(1,819 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,076 |
) |
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(7,215 |
) |
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
(7,101 |
) |
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
6,432 |
|
|
|
1,705 |
|
|
|
8,137 |
|
|
36
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (unaudited)
(continued)
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
During 2007, AIG made certain revisions to the Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows, primarily relating to the effect of
reclassifying certain policyholders account balances, the
elimination of certain intercompany balances and revisions
related to separate account assets. Accordingly, AIG revised the
previous periods presented to conform to the revised
presentation. There was no effect on ending cash balances.
In addition, the table below reflects the effects of the
adoption of FSP FIN 39-1 as discussed in Note 1,
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.
The revisions and their effect on the Consolidated Statement
of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2007 were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally Reported | |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
June 30, 2007 | |
|
Revisions | |
|
As Revised | |
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) from operating activities
|
|
$ |
15,071 |
|
|
$ |
2,360 |
|
|
$ |
17,431 |
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) from investing activities
|
|
|
(37,873 |
) |
|
|
(2,441 |
) |
|
|
(40,314 |
) |
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
22,866 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
22,947 |
|
|
37
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
ITEM 2. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations is designed to provide the
reader a narrative with respect to AIGs operations,
financial condition and liquidity and certain other significant
matters.
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
| |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
Cautionary Statement Regarding Projections and Other
Information About Future Events
This Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q and
other publicly available documents may include, and AIGs
officers and representatives may from time to time make,
projections concerning financial information and statements
concerning future economic performance and events, plans and
objectives relating to management, operations, products and
services, and assumptions underlying these projections and
statements. These projections and statements are not historical
facts but instead represent only AIGs belief regarding
future events, many of which, by their nature, are inherently
uncertain and outside AIGs control. These projections and
statements may address, among other things, the status and
potential future outcome of the current regulatory and civil
proceedings against AIG and their potential effect on AIGs
businesses, financial condition, results of operations, cash
flows and liquidity, AIGs exposures to subprime mortgages,
monoline insurers and the residential and commercial real estate
markets and AIGs strategy for growth, product development,
market position, financial results and reserves. It is possible
that AIGs actual results and financial condition may
differ, possibly materially, from the anticipated results and
financial condition indicated in these projections and
statements. Factors that could cause AIGs actual results
to differ, possibly materially, from those in the specific
projections and statements are discussed in Outlook and
throughout this Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and in
Item 1A. Risk Factors of AIGs Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2007 (2007 Annual Report on
Form 10-K). AIG is
not under any obligation (and expressly disclaims any such
obligations) to update or alter any projection or other
statement, whether written or oral, that may be made from time
to time, whether as a result of new information, future events
or otherwise.
38
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
In addition to reviewing AIGs results for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2008, this Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations supplements and updates the information and
discussion included in the 2007 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Throughout this Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, AIG presents its
operations in the way it believes will be most meaningful.
Statutory loss ratios and combined ratios are presented in
accordance with accounting principles prescribed by insurance
regulatory authorities because these are standard measures of
performance filed with insurance regulatory authorities and used
for analysis in the insurance industry and thus allow more
meaningful comparisons with AIGs insurance competitors.
AIG also uses cross-references to additional information
included in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q and in
the 2007 Annual Report on
Form 10-K to
assist readers seeking related information on a particular
subject.
Overview of Operations
and Business Results
AIG identifies its reportable segments by product line,
consistent with its management structure. These segments are
General Insurance, Life Insurance & Retirement
Services, Financial Services and Asset Management. Through these
operating segments, AIG provides insurance, financial and
investment products and services to both businesses and
individuals in more than 130 countries and jurisdictions. This
geographic, product and service diversification is one of
AIGs major strengths and sets it apart from its
competitors. AIGs Other category consists of items not
allocated to AIGs operating segments.
AIGs subsidiaries serve commercial, institutional and
individual customers through an extensive property-casualty and
life insurance and retirement services network. In the United
States, AIG companies are the largest underwriters of commercial
and industrial insurance and are among the largest life
insurance and retirement services operations as well. AIGs
Financial Services businesses include commercial aircraft and
equipment leasing, capital markets operations and consumer
finance, both in the United States and abroad. AIG also provides
asset management services to institutions and individuals. As
part of its Spread-Based Investment activities, and to finance
its operations, AIG issues various debt instruments in the
public and private markets.
Outlook
The following paragraphs supplement and update the information
and discussion included in Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Outlook in the 2007 Annual Report on
Form 10-K to
reflect developments in or affecting AIGs business to date
during 2008. These paragraphs also supplement and update
Item 1A. Risk Factors in the 2007 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
General Trends
In mid-2007, the U.S. residential mortgage market began to
experience serious disruption due to credit quality
deterioration in a significant portion of loans originated,
particularly to non-prime and subprime borrowers; evolving
changes in the regulatory environment; a residential housing
market characterized by a slowing pace of transactions and
declining prices; increased cost and reduced availability of
borrowings for mortgage participants; a rising unemployment
rate; increased delinquencies in non-mortgage consumer credit;
and illiquid credit markets. The conditions continued and
worsened throughout 2007 and to date in 2008, expanding into the
broader U.S. credit markets and resulting in greater
volatility, less liquidity, widening of credit spreads, a lack
of price transparency and increased credit losses in certain
markets.
AIG participates in the U.S. residential mortgage market in
several ways: American General Finance, Inc. (AGF) originates
principally first-lien mortgage loans and to a lesser extent
second-lien mortgage loans to buyers and owners of residential
housing; United Guaranty Corporation (UGC) provides first loss
mortgage guaranty insurance for high
loan-to-value first-
and second-lien residential mortgages; AIG insurance and
financial services subsidiaries invest in mortgage-backed
securities and collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), in which
the underlying collateral is composed in whole or in part of
residential mortgage loans; and AIG Financial Products Corp. and
AIG Trading Group Inc. and their respective subsidiaries
(collectively, AIGFP) provides credit protection through credit
default swaps on certain super senior tranches of CDOs.
Continuing disruption in the U.S. residential mortgage and
other credit markets may also increase claim activity in the
financial institution segment of AIGs directors and
officers liability (D&O) and professional liability classes
of business. However, based on its review of information
currently available, AIG believes overall loss activity for the
broader D&O and professional liability classes is likely to
remain within or near the levels observed during the last
several years, which include losses related to stock options
backdating as well as to the U.S. residential mortgage
market.
The operating results of AIGs consumer finance and
mortgage guaranty operations in the United States have been and
are likely to continue to be adversely affected by the factors
referred to above. The downward cycle in the U.S. housing
market is not expected to improve until residential inventories
return to a more normal level and the mortgage credit market
stabilizes. The duration and severity of the downward cycle
could be further negatively affected in the event of an economic
recession. AIG expects that this
39
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
downward cycle will continue to adversely affect UGCs
operating results for the foreseeable future and will result in
a significant operating loss for UGC through at least the first
half of 2009. AIG also incurred substantial unrealized market
valuation losses on AIGFPs super senior credit default
swap portfolio and substantial other-than-temporary impairment
charges on AIGs available for sale securities in the first
six months of 2008 and fourth quarter of 2007. The results from
AIGs operations with exposure to the U.S. residential
mortgage market will be highly dependent on future market
conditions. Continuing market deterioration will cause AIG to
report additional unrealized market valuation losses and
impairment charges. Given the current difficult market
conditions, AIG is not able to predict the extent of any future
market valuation losses or impairment charges. Moreover, AIG is
unable to assess the effect, if any, that recent transactions
involving sales of large portfolios of CDOs will have on the
pricing of its credit default swaps, referenced CDOs or
available for sale securities or on collateral posting
requirements. There can be no assurance that increased claims
activity, operating losses, unrealized market valuation losses
and impairment charges will not be material to AIGs
consolidated financial condition or AIGs consolidated
results of operations for an individual reporting period.
The ongoing effect of the downward cycle in the
U.S. housing market on AIGs consolidated financial
condition could be material if the market disruption continues
to expand beyond the residential mortgage markets,
notwithstanding AIGs efforts to mitigate the risks to its
business by disciplined underwriting and active risk management.
AIG is also exploring measures to further protect its capital,
reduce risks where appropriate and enhance its overall liquidity.
A significant portion of AIGFPs guaranteed investment
agreements (GIAs) and financial derivative transactions include
provisions that require AIGFP, upon a downgrade of AIGs
long-term debt ratings, to post collateral or, with the consent
of the counterparties, assign or repay its positions or arrange
a substitute guarantee of its obligations by an obligor with
higher debt ratings.
It is estimated that, as of the close of business on
July 31, 2008, based on AIGFPs outstanding municipal
GIAs and financial derivative transactions at that date, a
downgrade of AIGs long-term senior debt ratings to
A1 by Moodys Investors Service (Moodys)
and A+ by Standard & Poors, a division of
The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (S&P), would permit
counterparties to make additional calls for up to approximately
$13.3 billion of collateral, while a downgrade to
A2 by Moodys and A by S&P
would permit counterparties to call for approximately
$1.2 billion of additional collateral. If either of
Moodys or S&P downgraded AIGs ratings to
A1 or A+, respectively, the estimated
collateral call would be for up to approximately
$10.5 billion, while a downgrade to A2 or
A, respectively, by either of the two rating
agencies would permit counterparties to call for up to
approximately $1.1 billion of additional collateral.
Furthermore, a downgrade of AIGs long-term senior debt
ratings to A1 by Moodys or to the same levels
by both rating agencies would permit either AIG or the
counterparties to elect early termination of contracts resulting
in payments of up to approximately $4.6 billion, while a
downgrade to A2 by Moodys and A by
S&P would permit either AIG or the counterparties to elect
early termination of additional contracts resulting in
additional payments of up to approximately $800 million.
AIGFP believes that it is unlikely that certain of these
counterparties would exercise their rights to elect termination
of their contracts given the substantial economic benefit that
such counterparties would forfeit upon termination.
The actual amount of collateral that AIGFP would be required to
post to counterparties in the event of such downgrades, or the
aggregate amount of payments that AIG could be required to make,
depends on market conditions, the fair value of outstanding
affected transactions and other factors prevailing at the time
of the downgrade. Additional obligations to post collateral or
the costs of assignment, repayment or alternative credit support
would increase the demands on AIGs liquidity. Further
downgrades could result in requirements for substantial
additional collateral, which could have a material adverse
effect on AIGs liquidity. For a further discussion of
AIGs credit ratings and the potential effect of posting
collateral on AIGs liquidity, see Capital
Resources and Liquidity Credit Ratings and
Liquidity herein.
Globally, heightened regulatory scrutiny of financial services
companies in many jurisdictions has the potential to affect
future financial results through higher compliance costs. This
is particularly true in the United States, where federal and
state authorities have commenced various investigations of the
financial services industry, and in Japan and Southeast Asia,
where financial institutions have received remediation orders
affecting consumer and policyholder rights.
As a result of the disruption of the U.S. residential housing
market, AIG recognized
other-than-temporary
impairment charges over the last three quarters. Accordingly,
any accretion to the expected recovery amount will be recognized
in earnings in future periods over the expected recovery periods.
AIG tested goodwill for impairment as of June 30, 2008 and
no impairment was identified. However, as a result of structural
trends in the consumer finance market and the current
competitive environment in the personal lines market,
40
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
the excess of the fair value over the carrying value of
AIGs Consumer Finance and Personal Lines reporting units
has narrowed. As of June 30, 2008, goodwill related to each
of these reporting units amounted to approximately
$700 million. A continuation of these trends could result
in impairment in goodwill for these reporting units in the
future.
General Insurance
The commercial property and casualty insurance industry has
historically experienced cycles of price erosion followed by
rate strengthening as a result of catastrophes or other
significant losses that affect the overall capacity of the
industry to provide coverage. As premium rates decline, AIG will
generally experience higher current accident year loss ratios,
as the written premiums are earned, and higher expense ratios if
written premiums decline more quickly than expenses. Despite
industry price erosion in commercial lines, AIG expects to
continue to identify profitable opportunities and build
attractive new general insurance businesses as a result of
AIGs broad product line and extensive distribution
networks in the United States and abroad.
Workers compensation remains under considerable pricing
pressure, as statutory rates continue to decline. Rates for most
casualty lines of insurance continue to decline due to
competitive pressures, particularly for aviation, excess
casualty and D&O exposures. Rates for commercial property
lines are also declining following another year of relatively
low catastrophe losses in 2007, a decline that is continuing
despite increased natural catastrophe losses in 2008. Further
price erosion is expected during the remainder of 2008 for the
commercial lines. AIG seeks to mitigate the decline by
constantly seeking out profitable opportunities across its
diverse product lines and distribution networks while
maintaining a commitment to underwriting discipline. There can
be no assurance that price erosion will not become more
widespread or that AIGs profitability will not deteriorate
from current levels in major commercial lines.
The personal lines automobile insurance industry is currently
experiencing a soft market. Industry underwriting results are
expected to deteriorate due to a generally weakening economy and
increasing loss trends. AIGs personal auto business has
been affected by these trends, but AIG has filed rate increases,
tightened underwriting guidelines and made pricing enhancements
to seek to improve the underwriting results.
AIG has capital maintenance agreements with the companies
included in the Commercial Insurance and Mortgage Guaranty
reporting units that set forth procedures through which AIG will
provide ongoing capital support. AIG expects that additional
capital contributions may be required during the remainder of
2008 pursuant to these agreements.
Life Insurance & Retirement Services
Disruption in the U.S. residential mortgage and credit
markets had a significant adverse effect on Life
Insurance & Retirement Services operating results,
specifically its net investment income and net realized capital
losses in 2007 and the first six months of 2008, and AIG expects
that this disruption will continue to be a key factor in the
remainder of 2008 and beyond, especially in its
U.S.-based operations.
The volatility in operating results will be further magnified by
the continuing market shift to variable products with living
benefits.
In response to the market disruption, AIG, including Domestic
Life and Domestic Retirement Services, has been increasing its
liquidity position and investing in shorter duration
investments. While prudent in the current environment, such
actions will reduce overall investment yields for the
foreseeable future.
Recent capital markets volatility has put pressure on credit
lenders resulting in increased costs for premium financing,
which could affect future sales of products where such financing
is used, primarily in large universal life policies in Domestic
Life Insurance.
The U.S. dollar has significantly weakened against many
currencies, resulting in a favorable effect on operating results
due to the translation of foreign currencies to the
U.S. dollar. However, the weakened dollar has an
unfavorable effect on other-than-temporary impairments in
Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement Services and will
continue to affect operating results throughout 2008.
During the second quarter of 2008, AIG made capital
contributions aggregating $1.1 billion to the surplus of
certain of its Domestic Life Insurance and Domestic Retirement
Services subsidiaries to replace a portion of the capital lost
as a result of net realized capital losses, including other-than
temporary impairments. In Taiwan, $361 million was
contributed to meet the needs of this growing business and
increased risk-based capital requirements. AIG expects that it
will make additional capital contributions to these operations
during the remainder of 2008, in large measure due to the
continued effect of net realized capital losses resulting from
severity-related other-than-temporary impairment charges.
Financial Services
During 2008, AIGFPs revenues from certain products have
declined, in part, as a consequence of the continued disruption
in the credit markets, the general decline in liquidity in the
marketplace, and AIGFPs efforts to manage its liquidity.
Furthermore, AIGFP has not been able to replace revenues
previously generated from certain structured tax and credit
derivative transactions that were terminated or matured at the
end of 2007 and early 2008. AIG expects that
41
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
AIGFPs operating results will continue to be adversely
affected for the foreseeable future.
AIG exercises significant judgment in the valuation of its
various credit default swap portfolios. AIG uses pricing models
and other methodologies to value these portfolios that take into
account, where applicable, and to the extent possible,
third-party prices, pricing matrices, the movement of indices
(such as the CDX and iTraxx), collateral calls and other
observable market data. AIG believes that the assumptions and
judgments it makes are reasonable and lead to an overall
methodology that is reasonable, but other market participants
may use other methodologies, including, among other things,
models, indices and selection of third-party pricing sources,
that are based upon different assumptions and judgments, and
these methodologies may generate materially different values.
For additional information regarding AIGs methodology,
models and assumptions with respect to the valuation and
credit-based analyses of the AIGFP super senior credit default
swap portfolio, see Critical Accounting Estimates
Fair Value Measurements of Certain Financial Assets and
Liabilities AIGFPs Super Senior Credit Default
Swap Portfolio, and Valuation of Level 3 Assets
and Liabilities Super senior credit default swap
portfolio. See Risk Management Credit Derivatives.
The ongoing disruption in the U.S. residential mortgage and
credit markets and the downgrades of residential mortgage-backed
securities and CDO securities by rating agencies continue to
adversely affect the fair value of the super senior credit
default swap portfolio written by AIGFP. AIG expects that
continuing limitations on the availability of market observable
data will affect AIGs determinations of the fair value of
these derivatives. The fair value of these derivatives is
expected to continue to fluctuate, perhaps materially, in
response to changing market conditions, and AIGs estimates
of the value of AIGFPs super senior credit default swap
portfolio at future dates could therefore be materially
different from current estimates. Further declines in the fair
values of these derivatives may also require AIGFP to post
additional collateral which may be material to AIGFPs
financial condition.
At June 30, 2008, the fair value of AIGFPs super
senior credit default swap portfolio, a net loss of
$26.1 billion, represents AIGs best estimate of the
amount it would need to pay a willing, able and knowledgeable
third party to assume the obligations under AIGFPs super
senior credit default swap portfolio at that date.
At June 30, 2008, AIG used a roll rate analysis to stress
the AIGFP super senior multi-sector CDO credit default swap
portfolio for potential pre-tax realized credit losses. Two
scenarios illustrated in this process resulted in potential
realized credit losses of approximately $5.0 billion
(Scenario A) and approximately $8.5 billion
(Scenario B). Actual ultimate realized credit losses are
likely to vary, perhaps materially, from these scenarios, and
there can be no assurance that the ultimate realized credit
losses related to the AIGFP super senior multi-sector CDO credit
default swap portfolio will be consistent with either scenario
or that such realized credit losses will not exceed the
potential realized credit losses illustrated by Scenario B.
For a further discussion of AIGs stress testing using the
roll rate analyses, see Risk Management Stress
Testing/Sensitivity Analysis.
Approximately $307 billion of the $441 billion in
notional exposure on AIGFPs super senior credit default
swap portfolio as of June 30, 2008 was written to
facilitate regulatory capital relief for financial institutions
primarily in Europe. AIG expects that the majority of these
transactions will be terminated within the next 9 to 21 months
by AIGFPs counterparties when they no longer provide the
regulatory capital benefit.
In light of early termination experience to date and after other
comprehensive analyses, AIG determined that there was no
unrealized market valuation adjustment to be recognized for this
regulatory capital relief portfolio for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 other than for transactions where AIGFP
believes the counterparties are no longer using the transactions
to obtain regulatory capital relief. AIG will continue to assess
the valuation of this portfolio and monitor developments in the
marketplace. Given the significant deterioration in the global
credit markets and the risk that AIGFPs expectations with
respect to the termination of these transactions by its
counterparties may not materialize, there can be no assurance
that AIG will not recognize unrealized market valuation losses
from this portfolio in future periods, and recognition of even a
small percentage decline in the fair value of this portfolio
could be material to an individual reporting period. These
transactions contributed approximately $156 million to
AIGFPs revenues in the six-month period ended
June 30, 2008. If AIGFP is not successful in replacing the
revenues generated by these transactions, AIGFPs operating
results could be materially adversely affected.
The airline industry is experiencing financial stress primarily
due to record-high fuel costs, tightening of the credit markets
and generally worsening economic conditions. This financial
stress is causing a slow-down in the airline industry, and will
likely have a negative effect on future lease rates and could
begin to influence ILFCs results of operations as some
airlines may approach ILFC to renegotiate transactions.
Asset Management
In the Institutional Asset Management business, management fees
are earned based on the value of assets under management or
committed capital. Declines in the equity and credit markets
negatively affect the value of these investments
42
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
which may result in lower base management fees. Additionally,
real estate investments are made through AIG Global Real Estate
Investment Corp. (AIG Global Real Estate), typically for the
purpose of development or repositioning and subsequent sale.
Softening of the real estate and/or credit markets may delay the
timing of development, repositioning and subsequent sale of
these investments.
From time to time, AIG Global Asset Management Holdings Corp.
and its subsidiaries and affiliated companies (collectively, AIG
Investments) acquires alternative investments, primarily
consisting of direct controlling equity interests in private
enterprises, with the intention of transferring such investments
to a to-be-established AIG sponsored fund or acquiring such
investments to be held temporarily until distribution to a third
party or AIG affiliate is completed (warehoused assets). Market
conditions may impede AIG from launching new investment products
for which these warehoused assets are being held. Market
conditions may also prevent AIG from recovering its investment
upon transfer or divestment.
For a description of important factors that may affect the
operations and initiatives described above, see Item 1A.
Risk Factors in the 2007 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Consolidated Results
AIGs consolidated revenues, income (loss) before income
taxes, minority interest and net income (loss) were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
|
|
June 30, | |
|
Percentage | |
|
June 30, | |
|
Percentage | |
|
|
| |
|
Increase/ | |
|
| |
|
Increase/ | |
(in millions) |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
| |
Total revenues
|
|
$ |
19,933 |
|
|
$ |
31,150 |
|
|
|
(36) |
% |
|
$ |
33,964 |
|
|
$ |
61,795 |
|
|
|
(45) |
% |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interest
|
|
|
(8,756 |
) |
|
|
6,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,020 |
) |
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(5,357 |
) |
|
$ |
4,277 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
(13,162 |
) |
|
$ |
8,407 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
AIGs consolidated revenues decreased in the three and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same
periods in 2007 due to unrealized market valuation losses of
$5.6 billion and $14.7 billion, respectively, on
AIGFPs super senior credit default swap portfolio recorded
in other income, higher net realized capital losses and a
decline in net investment income, which more than offset growth
in premiums and other considerations in the Life
Insurance & Retirement Services segment. Net realized
capital losses of $6.1 billion and $12.2 billion in
the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008,
respectively, included other-than-temporary impairment charges
of $6.8 billion and $12.4 billion, primarily related
to the significant disruption in the residential mortgage and
credit markets and investment-related losses of
$241 million and $1.0 billion where AIG lacks the
intent to hold the investments to recovery. Total
other-than-temporary impairment charges in the three- and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2007 were
$417 million and $884 million, respectively. See
Invested Assets Portfolio Review
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments herein. The decline in net
investment income reflects higher trading account losses in the
U.K., lower returns from yield enhancement income, partnerships,
hedge funds and mutual funds as well as lower policyholder
trading gains in Life Insurance & Retirement Services.
Policyholder trading gains are offset by a charge to incurred
policy losses and benefits expense.
Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interest declined
in the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 due
primarily to the losses described above.
Income Taxes
The effective tax rate on the pre-tax loss for the three-month
period ended June 30, 2008 was 38.4 percent. The
effective tax rate was higher than the statutory rate of
35 percent due primarily to tax benefits from foreign
operations and tax exempt interest. The effective tax rate on
the pre-tax loss for the six-month period ended June 30,
2008 was 34.4 percent. The effective tax rate was adversely
affected by $703 million of tax charges from the first
three months of 2008, comprised of increases in the reserves for
uncertain tax positions and other discrete period items. The
effective tax rate on the pre-tax income for the three- and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2007 was 26.5 percent
and 27.2 percent, respectively. The effective tax rates
were low due primarily to benefits from remediation adjustments
and the recognition of tax benefits associated with the SICO
Plan for which the compensation expense was recognized in prior
years. See also Note 8 to Consolidated Financial Statements.
43
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Segment Results
The following table summarizes the operations of each
principal segment: (See also Note 2 to Consolidated
Financial Statements.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
Percentage |
|
June 30, |
|
Percentage |
Operating Segments |
|
|
|
Increase/ |
|
|
|
Increase/ |
(in millions) |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
(Decrease) |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Total
revenues(a):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Insurance
|
|
$ |
12,757 |
|
|
$ |
12,928 |
|
|
|
(1) |
% |
|
$ |
25,046 |
|
|
$ |
25,831 |
|
|
|
(3) |
% |
|
Life Insurance & Retirement
Services(b)
|
|
|
10,161 |
|
|
|
14,023 |
|
|
|
(28) |
|
|
|
18,913 |
|
|
|
27,705 |
|
|
|
(32) |
|
|
Financial
Services(c)(d)
|
|
|
(3,605 |
) |
|
|
2,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,165 |
) |
|
|
4,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset
Management(e)
|
|
|
797 |
|
|
|
1,781 |
|
|
|
(55) |
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
3,450 |
|
|
|
(81) |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
(21) |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
(80) |
|
|
Consolidation and eliminations
|
|
|
(385 |
) |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(558 |
) |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
19,933 |
|
|
$ |
31,150 |
|
|
|
(36) |
% |
|
$ |
33,964 |
|
|
$ |
61,795 |
|
|
|
(45) |
% |
|
Operating income
(loss)(a):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Insurance
|
|
$ |
827 |
|
|
$ |
2,976 |
|
|
|
(72) |
% |
|
$ |
2,164 |
|
|
$ |
6,072 |
|
|
|
(64) |
% |
|
Life Insurance & Retirement
Services(b)
|
|
|
(2,401 |
) |
|
|
2,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,232 |
) |
|
|
4,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
Services(c)(d)
|
|
|
(5,905 |
) |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,677 |
) |
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset
Management(e)
|
|
|
(314 |
) |
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,565 |
) |
|
|
1,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(715 |
) |
|
|
(460 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,483 |
) |
|
|
(930 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidation and eliminations
|
|
|
(248 |
) |
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(227 |
) |
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
(8,756 |
) |
|
$ |
6,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(20,020 |
) |
|
$ |
12,500 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(a) |
Includes other-than-temporary impairment charges of
$6.8 billion and $417 million for the three-month
periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and
$12.4 billion and $884 million for the six-month
periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Also
includes gains (losses) from hedging activities that did not
qualify for hedge accounting treatment under
FAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities (FAS 133),
including the related foreign exchange gains and losses. For the
three-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the
effect was $272 million and $(430) million,
respectively, in both revenues and operating income (loss). For
the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the
effect was $(476) million and $(882) million,
respectively, in both revenues and operating income (loss).
These amounts result primarily from interest rate and foreign
currency derivatives that are effective economic hedges of
investments and borrowings. |
(b) |
Includes other-than-temporary impairment charges of
$5.2 billion and $324 million for the three-month
periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and
$9.6 billion and $716 million for the six-month
periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
|
|
(c) |
Includes gains (losses) from hedging activities that did not
qualify for hedge accounting treatment under FAS 133,
including the related foreign exchange gains and losses. For the
three-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the
effect was $5 million and $(443) million,
respectively, in both revenues and operating income (loss). For
the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the
effect was $(199) million and $(603) million,
respectively, in both revenues and operating income (loss).
These amounts result primarily from interest rate and foreign
currency derivatives that are effective economic hedges of
investments and borrowings. |
|
|
(d) |
For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30,
2008, both revenues and operating income (loss) include
unrealized market valuation losses of $5.6 billion and
$14.7 billion, respectively, on AIGFPs super senior
credit default swap portfolio. |
|
|
(e) |
Includes net realized capital losses of $464 million and
$1.9 billion for the three- and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2008, respectively, including other-than-temporary
impairment charges of $882 million and $1.9 billion,
respectively. |
General Insurance
AIGs General Insurance operations provide property and
casualty products and services throughout the world. Revenues in
the General Insurance segment represent net premiums earned, net
investment income and net realized capital gains (losses). The
decrease in General Insurance revenues in the three-month period
ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 was
due to higher net realized capital losses in the three-month
period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in
2007 and lower net investment income as returns on partnership
investments declined. The decrease in General Insurance revenues
in the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the
same period in 2007 was due to net realized capital losses in
the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to net
realized capital gains in the same period of 2007 and lower net
investment income as returns on partnership investments
declined. The decrease in General Insurance operating income in
the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008
compared to the same period in 2007 was principally due to lower
underwriting profit and net investment income from AIG
Commercial Insurance (Commercial Insurance) as well as net
realized capital losses incurred by Commercial Insurance in
2008. Operating losses from the Mortgage Guaranty business and a
decline in Foreign General Insurance net investment income in
2008 also contributed to the decrease in General Insurance
operating income.
Life Insurance & Retirement Services
AIGs Life Insurance & Retirement Services
operations provide insurance, financial and investment-oriented
products throughout the world. Revenues in the Life
Insurance & Retirement Services operations represent
premiums and other considerations, net investment income and net
realized capital gains (losses). Foreign operations contributed
approximately 80 percent of AIGs Life
Insurance & Retirement Services premiums and other
considerations for both the three- and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007.
Life Insurance & Retirement Services reported operating
losses in the three- and six-month periods of 2008 compared to
operating income in the same period in 2007, primarily due to
lower net investment income and higher net realized capital
losses in 2008, which were partially offset by the favorable
effect of foreign exchange rates, lower deferred
44
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
policy acquisition costs (DAC) and sales inducement asset
(SIA) amortization related to realized capital losses,
growth in the underlying reserves which reflects increased
assets under management and increased business in force.
Financial Services
AIGs Financial Services subsidiaries engage in diversified
activities including aircraft and equipment leasing, capital
markets, consumer finance and insurance premium finance.
Revenues in the Financial Services segment include interest,
realized and unrealized gains and losses, including the
unrealized market valuation losses on AIGFPs super senior
credit default swap portfolio, and lease and finance charges.
Financial Services reported operating losses in the three-and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 compared to operating
income in the same periods in 2007, primarily due to unrealized
market valuation losses of $5.6 billion and
$14.7 billion in the three- and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2008, respectively, on AIGFPs super senior
credit default swap portfolio, the remaining operating loss
resulting from the change in credit spreads on AIGFPs
other assets and liabilities and a decline in operating income
for AGF. Capital Markets net operating loss for the three- and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 was $6.3 billion and
$15.2 billion, respectively, reflecting the pre-tax unrealized
market valuation loss on the super senior credit default swap
portfolio. Included in the unrealized market valuation loss were
gains of $44 million and $109 million as a result of
the effects of AIGs own credit spreads on the valuation of
these derivatives for the three- and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2008, respectively. The effect of the changes in
AIGs own credit spreads, including the aforementioned
amounts reflected in the unrealized market valuation loss, was a
decrease in pre-tax income of $112 million and an increase of
$2.5 billion for the three- and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2008, respectively. The effect of the changes in
counterparty credit spreads for assets measured at fair value at
AIGFP was a decrease of $362 million and $3.0 billion
for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008,
respectively. On January 1, 2008, AIGFP elected the fair
value option for almost all of its eligible financial assets and
liabilities. Included in the first quarter 2008 net
operating loss was the transition amount of $291 million
related to the adoption of FAS 157 and FAS 159.
AGFs operating income declined in the three- and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same periods in
2007, primarily due to increases in the provision for finance
receivable losses and unfavorable variances related to
derivatives which economically hedge AGF debt. AGFs
operating income for the three- and six- month periods ended
June 30, 2008 also reflected a pre-tax charge of
$27 million resulting from AGFs decision to cease its
wholesale originations (originations through mortgage brokers).
In the second quarter and first six months of 2007, the domestic
consumer finance operations recorded pre-tax charges of
$50 million and $178 million, respectively,
representing the estimated cost of implementing the Supervisory
Agreement entered into with the Office of Thrift Supervision
(OTS), which are discussed in the Consumer Finance results of
operations section. Based on the current estimated cost of
implementing the Supervisory Agreement, partial reversals of
these prior year charges of $25 million and
$43 million were recorded for the three- and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2008, respectively.
Operating income for ILFC increased in the three and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same periods in
2007 driven to a large extent by a larger aircraft fleet, higher
lease rates and higher utilization and lower composite borrowing
rates.
Asset Management
AIGs Asset Management operations include institutional
asset management, broker-dealer related services and mutual
funds and the Spread-Based Investment business. Revenues in the
Asset Management segment represent investment income with
respect to spread-based products, and management and advisory
fees, carried interest revenues on the performance of the
underlying funds, and realized gains on real estate investments
in institutional products.
Asset Management reported operating losses in the three- and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 compared to operating
income in the same periods in 2007, due to other-than-temporary
impairment charges on fixed maturity securities, lower
partnership income and a decline in carried interest revenues.
2007 results included a gain of $398 million related to the
sale of a portion of AIGs investment in The Blackstone
Group L.P. in connection with its initial public offering.
Capital Resources
At June 30, 2008, AIG had total consolidated
shareholders equity of $78.1 billion and total
consolidated borrowings of $178.6 billion. At that date,
$68.6 billion of such borrowings were subsidiary borrowings
not guaranteed by AIG.
In May 2008, AIG raised a total of approximately
$20 billion through the sale of: (i) 196,710,525
shares of AIG common stock at a price per share of $38, for an
aggregate amount of $7.47 billion;
(ii) 78.4 million equity units at a price per unit of
$75, for an aggregate amount of $5.88 billion; and (iii)
$6.9 billion of junior subordinated debentures in three
series. The equity units and junior subordinated debentures
receive hybrid equity treatment from the major rating agencies
under their current policies.
45
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Liquidity
AIG manages liquidity at both the subsidiary and parent company
levels. At June 30, 2008, AIGs consolidated invested
assets, primarily held by its subsidiaries, included
$82.2 billion in cash and short-term investments.
Consolidated net cash provided from operating activities in the
first six months of 2008 amounted to $16.6 billion. At both
the subsidiary and parent company level, liquidity management
activities are intended to preserve and enhance funding
stability, flexibility, and diversity through a wide range of
potential operating environments and market conditions.
AIGs primary sources of cash flow are dividends and other
payments from its regulated and unregulated subsidiaries, as
well as issuances of debt and equity securities. Primary uses of
cash flow are for debt service, subsidiary funding, shareholder
dividend payments and common stock repurchases. Management
believes that AIGs liquid assets, cash provided by
operations and access to the capital markets will enable it to
meet its anticipated cash requirements.
For additional information, see Capital Resources and Liquidity.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (GAAP) requires the application of accounting policies
that often involve a significant degree of judgment. AIG
considers that its accounting policies that are most dependent
on the application of estimates and assumptions, and therefore
viewed as critical accounting estimates, to be those relating to
reserves for losses and loss expenses, future policy benefits
for life and accident and health contracts, recoverability of
DAC, estimated gross profits for investment-oriented products,
fair value measurements of certain financial assets and
liabilities, other-than-temporary impairments, the allowance for
finance receivable losses and flight equipment recoverability.
These accounting estimates require the use of assumptions about
matters, some of which are highly uncertain at the time of
estimation. To the extent actual experience differs from the
assumptions used, AIGs results of operations would be
directly affected.
Throughout this Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, AIGs
critical accounting estimates are discussed in detail. The major
categories for which assumptions are developed and used to
establish each critical accounting estimate are highlighted
below.
Reserves for Losses and Loss Expenses
(General Insurance):
|
|
|
Loss trend factors: used to establish expected loss
ratios for subsequent accident years based on premium rate
adequacy and the projected loss ratio with respect to prior
accident years. |
|
|
Expected loss ratios for the latest accident year: in
this case, accident year 2008 for the year-end 2008 loss reserve
analysis. For low-frequency, high-severity classes such as
excess casualty, expected loss ratios generally are utilized for
at least the three most recent accident years. |
|
|
Loss development factors: used to project the reported
losses for each accident year to an ultimate amount. |
|
|
Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses: the expected
recoveries from reinsurers on losses that have not yet been
reported and/or settled. |
Future Policy Benefits for Life and Accident and Health
Contracts (Life Insurance & Retirement Services):
|
|
|
Interest rates: which vary by geographical region, year
of issuance and products. |
|
|
Mortality, morbidity and surrender rates: based upon
actual experience by geographical region modified to allow for
variation in policy form, risk classification and distribution
channel. |
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs (Life Insurance &
Retirement Services):
|
|
|
Recoverability: based on current and future expected
profitability, which is affected by interest rates, foreign
exchange rates, mortality/morbidity experience, expenses,
investment returns and policy persistency. |
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs (General Insurance):
|
|
|
Recoverability: based upon the current terms and
profitability of the underlying insurance contracts. |
Estimated Gross Profits for Investment-Oriented Products
(Life Insurance & Retirement Services):
|
|
|
Estimated gross profits: to be realized over the
estimated duration of the contracts (investment-oriented
products) affect the carrying value of DAC, unearned revenue
liability, SIAs and associated amortization patterns. Estimated
gross profits include investment income and gains and losses on
investments less required interest, actual mortality and other
expenses. |
Allowance for Finance Receivable Losses (Financial
Services):
|
|
|
Historical defaults and delinquency experience: utilizing
factors, such as delinquency ratio, allowance ratio, charge-off
ratio and charge-off coverage. |
|
|
Portfolio characteristics: portfolio composition and
consideration of the recent changes to underwriting criteria and
portfolio seasoning. |
|
|
External factors: consideration of current economic
conditions, including levels of unemployment and personal
bankruptcies. |
46
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Migration analysis: empirical technique measuring
historical movement of similar finance receivables through
various levels of repayment, delinquency, and loss categories to
existing finance receivable pools. |
Flight Equipment Recoverability (Financial Services):
|
|
|
Expected undiscounted future net cash flows: based upon
current lease rates, projected future lease rates and estimated
terminal values of each aircraft based on expectations of market
participants. |
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments:
AIG evaluates its investments for impairment such that a
security is considered a candidate for other-than-temporary
impairment if it meets any of the following criteria:
|
|
|
Trading at a significant (25 percent or more) discount to
par, amortized cost (if lower) or cost for an extended period of
time (nine consecutive months or longer); |
|
|
The occurrence of a discrete credit event resulting in
(i) the issuer defaulting on a material outstanding
obligation; (ii) the issuer seeking protection from
creditors under the bankruptcy laws or any similar laws intended
for court supervised reorganization of insolvent enterprises; or
(iii) the issuer proposing a voluntary reorganization
pursuant to which creditors are asked to exchange their claims
for cash or securities having a fair value substantially lower
than par value of their claims; or |
|
|
AIG may not realize a full recovery on its investment,
regardless of the occurrence of one of the foregoing events. |
The determination that a security has incurred an
other-than-temporary decline in value requires the judgment of
management and consideration of the fundamental condition of the
issuer, its near-term prospects and all the relevant facts and
circumstances. The above criteria also consider circumstances of
a rapid and severe market valuation decline, such as that
experienced in current credit markets, in which AIG could not
reasonably assert that the recovery period would be temporary
(severity losses). For further discussion, see Invested
Assets Portfolio Review
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments.
At each balance sheet date, AIG evaluates its securities
holdings with unrealized losses. When AIG does not intend to
hold such securities until they have recovered their cost basis,
AIG records the unrealized loss in income. If a loss is
recognized from a sale subsequent to a balance sheet date
pursuant to changes in circumstances, the loss is recognized in
the period in which the intent to hold the securities to
recovery no longer existed.
In periods subsequent to the recognition of an
other-than-temporary impairment charge for fixed maturity
securities, which is not credit or foreign exchange related, AIG
generally accretes into income the discount or amortizes the
reduced premium resulting from the reduction in cost basis over
the remaining life of the security.
Fair Value Measurements of Certain Financial Assets and
Liabilities:
AIG measures at fair value on a recurring basis financial
instruments in its trading and available for sale securities
portfolios, certain mortgage and other loans receivable, certain
spot commodities, derivative assets and liabilities, securities
purchased (sold) under agreements to resell (repurchase),
securities lending invested collateral, non-marketable equity
investments, included in other invested assets, certain
policyholders contract deposits, securities and spot
commodities sold but not yet purchased, certain trust deposits
and deposits due to banks and other depositors, certain
long-term borrowings, and certain hybrid financial instruments
included in other liabilities. The fair value of a financial
instrument is the amount that would be received to sell an asset
or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date.
The degree of judgment used in measuring the fair value of
financial instruments generally correlates with the level of
pricing observability. Financial instruments with quoted prices
in active markets generally have more pricing observability and
less judgment is used in measuring fair value. Conversely,
financial instruments traded in other-than-active markets or
that do not have quoted prices have less observability and are
measured at fair value using valuation models or other pricing
techniques that require more judgment. Pricing observability is
affected by a number of factors, including the type of financial
instrument, whether the financial instrument is new to the
market and not yet established, the characteristics specific to
the transaction and general market conditions.
Fixed Maturity Securities Trading and Available
for Sale
AIG maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use
of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Whenever
available, AIG obtains quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets at the balance sheet date to measure at fair
value fixed maturity securities in its trading and available for
sale portfolios. Market price data generally is obtained from
exchange or dealer markets.
AIG estimates the fair value of fixed maturity securities not
traded in active markets, including securities purchased (sold)
under agreements to resell (repurchase) and mortgage and other
loans receivable, for which AIG elected the fair value option by
referring to traded securities with similar attributes, using
dealer quotations and matrix pricing methodologies, or
discounted cash flow analyses. This
47
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
methodology considers such factors as the issuers
industry, the securitys rating and tenor, its coupon rate,
its position in the capital structure of the issuer, yield
curves, credit curves, prepayment rates and other relevant
factors. For fixed maturity securities that are not traded in
active markets or that are subject to transfer restrictions,
valuations are adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or
non-transferability, and such adjustments generally are based on
available market evidence. In the absence of such evidence,
managements best estimate is used.
Equity Securities Traded in Active Markets
Trading and Available for Sale
AIG maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use
of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Whenever
available, AIG obtains quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets at the balance sheet date to measure at fair
value marketable equity securities in its trading and available
for sale portfolios. Market price data generally is obtained
from exchange or dealer markets.
Direct Private Equity Securities Not Traded in Active
Markets Other Invested Assets
AIG initially estimates the fair value of equity securities not
traded in active markets by reference to the transaction price.
This valuation is adjusted only when changes to inputs and
assumptions are corroborated by evidence such as transactions in
similar instruments, completed or pending third-party
transactions in the underlying investment or comparable
entities, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalizations and
other transactions across the capital structure, offerings in
the equity capital markets, and changes in financial ratios or
cash flows. For equity securities that are not traded in active
markets or that are subject to transfer restrictions, valuations
are adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability
and such adjustments generally are based on available market
evidence. In the absence of such evidence, managements
best estimate is used. AIG initially estimates the fair value of
investments in private limited partnerships and hedge funds by
reference to the transaction price. Subsequently, AIG obtains
the fair value of these investments generally from net asset
value information provided by the general partner or manager of
the investments, the financial statements of which generally are
audited annually.
Separate and Variable Account Assets
Separate and variable account assets are composed primarily of
registered and unregistered open-end mutual funds that generally
trade daily and are measured at fair value in the manner
discussed above for equity securities traded in active markets.
Freestanding Derivatives
Derivative assets and liabilities can be exchange-traded or
traded over the counter (OTC). AIG generally values
exchange-traded derivatives within portfolios using models that
calibrate to market clearing levels and eliminate timing
differences between the closing price of the exchange-traded
derivatives and their underlying instruments.
OTC derivatives are valued using market transactions and other
market evidence whenever possible, including market-based inputs
to models, model calibration to market clearing transactions,
broker or dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources with
reasonable levels of price transparency. When models are used,
the selection of a particular model to value an OTC derivative
depends on the contractual terms of, and specific risks inherent
in, the instrument as well as the availability of pricing
information in the market. AIG generally uses similar models to
value similar instruments. Valuation models require a variety of
inputs, including contractual terms, market prices and rates,
yield curves, credit curves, measures of volatility, prepayment
rates and correlations of such inputs. For OTC derivatives that
trade in liquid markets, such as generic forwards, swaps and
options, model inputs can generally be corroborated by
observable market data by correlation or other means and model
selection does not involve significant management judgment.
Certain OTC derivatives trade in less liquid markets with
limited pricing information and the determination of fair value
for these derivatives is inherently more difficult. When AIG
does not have corroborating market evidence to support
significant model inputs and cannot verify the model to market
transactions, the transaction price is initially used as the
best estimate of fair value. Accordingly, when a pricing model
is used to value such an instrument, the model is adjusted so
the model value at inception equals the transaction price.
Subsequent to initial recognition, AIG updates valuation inputs
when corroborated by evidence such as similar market
transactions, third-party pricing services and/or broker or
dealer quotations, or other empirical market data. When
appropriate, valuations are adjusted for various factors such as
liquidity, bid/offer spreads and credit considerations. Such
adjustments are generally based on available market evidence. In
the absence of such evidence, managements best estimate is
used.
With the adoption of FAS 157 on January 1, 2008,
AIGs own credit risk has been considered and is
incorporated into the fair value measurement of all freestanding
derivative liabilities.
Embedded Policy Derivatives
The fair value of embedded policy derivatives contained in
certain variable annuity and equity-indexed annuity and life
contracts is measured based on actuarial and capital market
48
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
assumptions related to projected cash flows over the expected
lives of the contracts. These cash flow estimates primarily
include benefits and related fees assessed, when applicable, and
incorporate expectations about policyholder behavior. Estimates
of future policyholder behavior are subjective and based
primarily on AIGs historical experience. With respect to
embedded policy derivatives in AIGs variable annuity
contracts, because of the dynamic and complex nature of the
expected cash flows, risk neutral valuations are used.
Estimating the underlying cash flows for these products involves
many estimates and judgments, including those regarding expected
market rates of return, market volatility, correlations of
market index returns to funds, fund performance, discount rates
and policyholder behavior. With respect to embedded policy
derivatives in AIGs equity-indexed annuity and life
contracts, option pricing models are used to estimate fair
value, taking into account assumptions for future equity indexed
growth rates, volatility of the equity index, future interest
rates, and determination on adjusting the participation rate and
the cap on equity indexed credited rates in light of market
conditions and policyholder behavior assumptions. With the
adoption of FAS 157, these methodologies were not changed,
with the exception of incorporating an explicit risk margin to
take into consideration market participant estimates of
projected cash flows and policyholder behavior.
AIGFPs Super Senior Credit Default Swap Portfolio
AIGFP values its credit default swaps written on the most senior
risk layers (super senior) of designated pools of debt
securities or loans using internal valuation models, third-party
prices and market indices. The specific valuation methodologies
vary based on the nature of the referenced obligations and
availability of market prices. AIGFP uses a modified version of
the Binomial Expansion Technique (BET) model to value its credit
default swap portfolio written on super senior tranches of CDOs
of asset-backed securities (ABS), including maturity-shortening
puts that allow the holders of the securities issued by certain
CDOs to treat the securities as short-term eligible
2a-7 investments under
the Investment Company Act of 1940
(2a-7 Puts). The BET
model uses default probabilities derived from credit spreads
implied from market prices for the individual securities
included in the underlying collateral pools securing the CDOs,
as well as diversity scores, weighted average lives, recovery
rates and discount rates. Prices for the individual securities
held by a CDO are obtained in most cases from the CDO collateral
managers, to the extent available. The CDO collateral managers
obtain these prices from various sources, which include dealer
quotations, third-party pricing services and in-house valuation
models. To the extent there is a lag in the prices provided by
the collateral managers, AIGFP rolls forward these prices to the
end of the quarter using data provided by a third-party pricing
service. Where a price for an individual security is not
provided by the CDO collateral manager, AIGFP derives the price
from a matrix that averages the prices of the various securities
at the level of ABS category, vintage and the rating of the
referenced security. The determination of some of these inputs
requires the use of judgment and estimates, particularly in the
absence of market observable data. AIGFP also employs a Monte
Carlo simulation to assist in quantifying the effect on the
valuation of the CDOs of the unique aspects of the CDOs
structure such as triggers that divert cash flows to the most
senior part of the capital structure. In the determination of
fair value, AIGFP also considers collateral calls and the price
estimates for the super senior CDO securities provided by third
parties, including counterparties to these transactions. See
Note 3 to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
information about fair value measurements.
In the case of credit default swaps written on investment-grade
corporate debt and CLOs, AIGFP estimates the value of its
obligations by reference to the relevant market indices or
third-party quotes on the underlying super senior tranches where
available.
In the case of credit default swaps written to facilitate
regulatory capital relief for AIGFPs European financial
institution counterparties, AIGFP estimates the fair value of
these derivatives by considering observable market transactions,
including the early termination of these transactions by
counterparties, and other market data, to the extent relevant.
Policyholders Contract Deposits
Policyholders contract deposits accounted for at fair
value beginning January 1, 2008 are measured using an
income approach by taking into consideration the following
factors:
|
|
|
Current policyholder account values and related surrender
charges, |
|
|
The present value of estimated future cash inflows (policy fees)
and outflows (benefits and maintenance expenses) associated with
the product using risk neutral valuations, incorporating
expectations about policyholder behavior, market returns and
other factors, and |
|
|
A risk margin that market participants would require for a
market return and the uncertainty inherent in the model inputs. |
The change in fair value of these policyholders contract
deposits is recorded as incurred policy losses and benefits in
the consolidated statement of income (loss).
Level 3 Assets and Liabilities
Under FAS 157, assets and liabilities recorded at fair
value in the consolidated balance sheet are classified in a
hierarchy for disclosure purposes consisting of three
levels based on the
49
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
observability of inputs available in the marketplace used to
measure the fair value. See Note 3 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for additional information about fair value
measurements.
At June 30, 2008, AIG classified $48.7 billion and
$37.3 billion of assets and liabilities, respectively,
measured at fair value on a recurring basis as Level 3.
This represented 4.7 percent and 3.8 percent of the
total assets and liabilities, respectively, measured at fair
value on a recurring basis. Level 3 fair value measurements
are based on valuation techniques that use at least one
significant input that is unobservable. These measurements are
made under circumstances in which there is little, if any,
market activity for the asset or liability. AIGs
assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair
value measurement in its entirety requires judgment.
In making the assessment, AIG considers factors specific to the
asset or liability. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure
fair value of an asset or a liability may fall into different
levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in
the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement
in its entirety is classified is determined based on the lowest
level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in
its entirety.
Valuation of Level 3 Assets and Liabilities
AIG values its assets and liabilities classified as Level 3
using judgment and valuation models or other pricing techniques
that require a variety of inputs including contractual terms,
market prices and rates, yield curves, credit curves, measures
of volatility, prepayment rates and correlations of such inputs,
some of which may be unobservable. The following paragraphs
describe the methods AIG uses to measure on a recurring basis
the fair value of the major classes of assets and liabilities
classified in Level 3.
Private equity and real estate fund investments: These
assets initially are valued at the transaction price, i.e., the
price paid to acquire the asset. Subsequently, they are measured
based on net asset value using information provided by the
general partner or manager of these investments, the accounts of
which generally are audited on an annual basis.
Corporate bonds and private placement debt: These assets
initially are valued at the transaction price. Subsequently,
they are valued using market data for similar instruments (e.g.,
recent transactions, bond spreads or credit default swap
spreads), comparisons to benchmark derivative indices or
movements in underlying credit spreads. When observable price
quotations are not available, fair value is determined based on
cash flow models with yield curves, bond or single-name credit
default swap spreads and estimated recovery rates.
Certain Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (RMBS):
These assets initially are valued at the transaction price.
Subsequently, they may be valued by comparison to transactions
in instruments with similar collateral and risk profiles,
remittances received and updated cumulative loss data on
underlying obligations, discounted cash flow techniques, and/or
option adjusted spread analyses.
Certain Asset-Backed Securities non-mortgage:
These assets initially are valued at the transaction price.
Subsequently, they may be valued based on external price/spread
data. When position-specific external price data are not
observable, the valuation is based on prices of comparable
securities.
CDOs: These assets initially are valued at the
transaction price. Subsequently, they are valued based on
external price/spread data from independent third parties,
dealer quotations, matrix pricing, or using the BET model.
Super senior credit default swap portfolio: AIGFP wrote
credit protection on the super senior risk layer of diversified
portfolios of investment-grade corporate debt, CLOs and
multi-sector CDOs. In these transactions, AIGFP is at risk only
on the super senior portion related to a diversified portfolio
referenced to loans or debt securities, which is the last
tranche to suffer losses after significant subordination. AIGFP
also wrote protection on tranches below the super senior layer.
At June 30, 2008, the notional amount, fair value and
unrealized market valuation loss of the AIGFP super senior
credit default swap portfolio, including certain regulatory
capital relief transactions, by asset class were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Unrealized Market | |
|
|
Valuation Loss | |
|
|
(Gain) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Three | |
|
Six | |
|
|
Fair Value | |
|
Months | |
|
Months | |
|
|
Loss at | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
Notional | |
|
June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
(in millions) |
|
Amount | |
|
2008 | |
|
2008(a) | |
|
2008(a) | |
| |
Regulatory
Capital:(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate loans
|
|
$ |
172,717 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Prime residential mortgages
|
|
|
132,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other(c)(d)
|
|
|
1,619 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
306,948 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
Arbitrage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-sector
CDOs(e)
|
|
|
80,301 |
|
|
|
24,785 |
|
|
|
5,569 |
|
|
|
13,606 |
|
|
Corporate debt/ CLOs
|
|
|
53,767 |
|
|
|
996 |
|
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
770 |
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
134,068 |
|
|
|
25,781 |
|
|
|
5,443 |
|
|
|
14,376 |
|
|
Mezzanine
tranches(f)
|
|
|
5,824 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
171 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
446,840 |
|
|
$ |
26,077 |
(g) |
|
$ |
5,565 |
|
|
$ |
14,672 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Includes credit valuation adjustment gains of
$44 million and $109 million, respectively, for the
three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008. |
(b) |
Represents predominantly transactions written to facilitate
regulatory capital relief. |
|
|
(c) |
Represents transactions where AIGFP believes the
counterparties are no longer using the transactions to obtain
regulatory capital relief. |
|
|
(d) |
During the second quarter of 2008, a European RMBS regulatory
capital relief transaction with a notional amount of
$1.6 billion was not |
50
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
terminated as expected when it
no longer provided regulatory capital relief to the
counterparty. |
|
|
(e) |
Approximately $57.8 billion in net notional amount includes
some exposure to U.S. sub-prime mortgages and approximately
$9.6 billion in net notional amount includes CDOs of
CMBS. |
(f) |
Represents credit default swaps written by AIGFP on tranches
below super senior on certain regulatory capital relief
trades. |
|
|
(g) |
Fair value amounts are shown before the effects of
counterparty netting adjustments. |
The valuation of the super senior credit derivatives continues
to be challenging given the limitation on the availability of
market observable information due to the lack of trading and
price transparency in the structured finance market,
particularly during and since the fourth quarter of 2007. These
market conditions have increased the reliance on management
estimates and judgments in arriving at an estimate of fair value
for financial reporting purposes. Further, disparities in the
valuation methodologies employed by market participants and the
varying judgments reached by such participants when assessing
volatile markets has increased the likelihood that the various
parties to these instruments may arrive at significantly
different estimates as to their fair values.
AIGFPs valuation methodologies for the super senior credit
default swap portfolio have evolved in response to the
deteriorating market conditions and the lack of sufficient
market observable information. AIG has sought to calibrate the
model to market information and to review the assumptions of the
model on a regular basis.
During the second quarter of 2008, AIGFP implemented further
refinements to the cash flow waterfall used by the BET model and
the assumptions used therein. These refinements reflected the
ability of a CDO to use principal proceeds to cover interest
payment obligations on lower-rated tranches, the ability of a
CDO to use principal proceeds to cure a breach of an
overcollateralization test, the ability of a CDO to amortize
certain senior CDO tranches on a pro-rata or sequential basis
and the preferential payment of management fees. To the extent
there is a lag in the prices provided by the collateral
managers, AIG refines those prices by rolling them forward to
the end of the quarter using prices provided by a third-party
pricing service. The net effect of these refinements was an
increase in the unrealized market valuation loss of
$342 million. Refinements made during the first quarter of
2008 had only a de minimus effect on the unrealized market
valuation loss.
AIGFP employs a modified version of the BET model to value its
credit default swap portfolio written on the super senior
securities issued by CDOs, including the embedded
2a-7 Puts. The BET
model uses default probabilities derived from credit spreads
implied from market prices for the individual securities
included in the underlying collateral pools securing the CDOs.
AIGFP obtained prices on these securities primarily from the CDO
collateral managers.
The BET model also uses diversity scores, weighted average
lives, recovery rates and discount rates. The determination of
some of these inputs requires the use of judgment and estimates,
particularly in the absence of market observable data. AIGFP
also employs a Monte Carlo simulation to assist in quantifying
the effect on valuation of the CDO of the unique features of the
CDOs structure such as triggers that divert cash flows to
the most senior level of the capital structure.
AIG selected the BET model for the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
it is known and utilized by other institutions; |
|
|
|
it has been studied extensively, documented and enhanced over
many years; |
|
|
|
it is transparent and relatively simple to apply; |
|
|
|
the parameters required to run the BET model are generally
observable; and |
|
|
|
it can easily be modified to use probabilities of default and
expected losses derived from the underlying collateral
securities market prices instead of using rating-based
historical probabilities of default. |
AIGs implementation of the BET model uses a Monte Carlo
simulation of the cash flows of each underlying CDO for various
scenarios of defaults by the underlying collateral securities.
The Monte Carlo simulation allows the model to take into account
the cash flow waterfall and to capture the benefits due to cash
flow diversion within each CDO.
The BET model has certain limitations. A well known limitation
of the BET model is that it can understate the expected losses
for super senior tranches when default correlations are high.
The model uses correlations implied from diversity scores which
do not capture the tendency for correlations to increase as
defaults increase. Recognizing this concern, AIG tested the
sensitivity of the valuations to the diversity scores. The
results of the testing demonstrated that the valuations are not
very sensitive to the diversity scores because the expected
losses generated from the prices of the collateral pool
securities are currently high, breaching the attachment point in
most transactions. Once the attachment point is breached by a
sufficient amount, the diversity scores, and their implied
correlations, are no longer a significant driver of the
valuation of a super senior tranche.
The credit default swaps written by AIGFP generally cover the
failure of payment on the super senior CDO security, which in
certain cases may also cover the acceleration of the super
senior CDO security upon an event of default of the CDO. AIGFP
does not own the securities in the CDO collateral pool. The
credit spreads implied from the market prices of the securities
in the CDO collateral pool incorporate the risk of default
(credit risk), the markets price for liquidity risk and in
distressed markets, the risk aversion
51
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
costs. Spreads on credit derivatives tend to be narrower than
the credit spreads implied from the market prices of the
securities in the CDO collateral pool because, unlike investing
in a bond, there is no need to fund the position (except when an
actual credit event occurs). In times of illiquidity, the
difference between spreads on cash securities and derivative
instruments (the negative basis) may be even wider for high
quality assets. AIGFP was unable to reliably verify this
negative basis with market observable inputs due to the
accelerating severe dislocation, illiquidity and lack of trading
in the ABS market during the fourth quarter of 2007 and the
first six months of 2008. The valuations produced by the BET
model therefore represent the valuations of the underlying super
senior CDO cash securities based on AIGs assumptions about
those securities, albeit with no recognition of any potential
effect of the basis differential on that valuation. AIGFP also
considered the valuation of the super senior CDO securities
provided by third parties, including counterparties to these
transactions, and made adjustments as necessary.
Valuation Sensitivity
Set forth in the paragraphs below are sensitivity analyses that
estimate the effects of using alternative pricing and other key
inputs on AIGs calculation of the unrealized market
valuation loss related to the AIGFP super senior credit default
swap portfolio. While AIG believes that the ranges used in these
analyses are reasonable, given the current difficult market
conditions, AIG is unable to predict which of the scenarios is
most likely to occur. AIG is also unable to assess the effect,
if any, that recent transactions involving sales of large
portfolios of CDOs will have on the pricing of the AIGFP super
senior credit default swap portfolio. Actual results in any
period are likely to vary, perhaps materially, from the modeled
scenarios, and there can be no assurance that the unrealized
market valuation loss related to the AIGFP super senior credit
default swap portfolio will be consistent with any of the
sensitivity analyses.
The most significant assumption used in developing the estimate
is the pricing of the securities within the CDO collateral
pools. These prices are used to derive default probabilities and
expected losses that are used in the BET model. If the actual
pricing of the securities within the collateral pools differs
from the pricing used in estimating the fair value of the super
senior credit default swap portfolio, there is potential for
material variation in the fair value estimate. A decrease by
five points (for example, from 87 cents per dollar to 82 cents
per dollar) in the aggregate price of the underlying collateral
securities would cause an additional unrealized market valuation
loss of approximately $4.0 billion, while an increase in
the aggregate price of the underlying collateral securities by
five points (for example, from 90 cents per dollar to 95
cents per dollar) would reduce the unrealized market valuation
loss by approximately $3.9 billion. Any further declines in
the value of the underlying collateral securities held by a CDO
will similarly affect the value of the super senior CDO
securities given their significantly depressed valuations. Given
the current difficult market conditions, AIG cannot predict
reasonably likely changes in the prices of the underlying
collateral securities held within a CDO at this time.
The following table presents other key inputs used in the
valuation of the credit default swap portfolio written on the
super senior securities issued by multi-sector CDOs, and the
potential increase (decrease) to the unrealized market valuation
loss at June 30, 2008 calculated using the BET model for
changes in these key inputs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase | |
|
|
(Decrease) To | |
|
|
Unrealized Market | |
(in millions) |
|
Valuation Loss | |
|
Weighted average lives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of an increase of 1 year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
519 |
|
|
Effect of a decrease of 1 year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(905 |
) |
Recovery rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of an increase of 10%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
Effect of a decrease of 10%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254 |
|
Diversity scores
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of an increase of 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
Effect of a decrease of 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261 |
|
Discount curve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of an increase of 100 basis points
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
These results are calculated by stressing a particular
assumption independently of changes in any other assumption. No
assurance can be given that the actual levels of the key inputs
will not exceed, perhaps significantly, the ranges assumed by
AIG for purposes of the above analysis. No assumption should be
made that results calculated from the use of other changes in
these key inputs can be interpolated or extrapolated from the
results set forth above.
In the case of credit default swaps written on investment grade
corporate debt and CLOs, AIGFP estimates the value of its
obligations by reference to the relevant market indices or
third-party quotes on the underlying super senior tranches where
available.
52
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
The following table represents the relevant market credit
indices and index CDS maturity used in the valuation of the
credit default swap portfolio written on investment-grade
corporate debt and the increase (decrease) to the unrealized
market valuation loss at June 30, 2008 corresponding to
changes in these market credit indices and maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase | |
|
|
(Decrease) To | |
|
|
Unrealized Market | |
(in millions) |
|
Valuation Loss | |
|
CDS maturity (in years)
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
CDX Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of an increase of 10 basis points
|
|
$ |
(23 |
) |
|
$ |
(48 |
) |
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
Effect of a decrease of 10 basis points
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
iTraxx Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of an increase of 10 basis points
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
Effect of a decrease of 10 basis points
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
These results are calculated by stressing a particular
assumption independently of changes in any other assumption. No
assurance can be given that the actual levels of the indices and
maturity will not exceed, perhaps significantly, the ranges
assumed by AIG for purposes of the above analysis. No assumption
should be made that results calculated from the use of other
changes in these indices and maturity can be interpolated or
extrapolated from the results set forth above.
For additional information about AIGFPs super senior
credit default swap portfolio, see Risk Management
Credit Derivatives.
Other derivatives. Valuation models that incorporate
unobservable inputs initially are calibrated to the transaction
price. Subsequent valuations are based on observable inputs to
the valuation model (e.g., interest rates, credit spreads,
volatilities, etc.). Model inputs are changed only when
corroborated by market data.
Transfers into Level 3
During the three-months ended June 30, 2008, AIG
transferred from Level 2 to Level 3 approximately
$2.3 billion of assets, primarily representing fixed
maturity securities for which the significant inputs used to
measure the fair value of the securities became unobservable
primarily as a result of the significant disruption in the
credit markets. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information about transfers into
Level 3.
Valuation Controls
AIG is actively developing and implementing a remediation plan
to address the material weakness in internal control relating to
the fair value valuation of the AIGFP super senior credit
default swap portfolio, and oversight thereof as described in
Item 9A. of the 2007 Annual Report on
Form 10-K. AIG is
developing new systems and processes to reduce reliance on
certain manual controls that have been established as
compensating controls over valuation of this portfolio and in
other areas, and is strengthening the resources required to
remediate this weakness. Notwithstanding this need to continue
strengthening these controls, AIG has an oversight structure
that includes appropriate segregation of duties with respect to
the valuation of its financial instruments. Senior management,
independent of the trading and investing functions, is
responsible for the oversight of control and valuation policies
and for reporting the results of these controls and policies to
AIGs Audit Committee. AIG employs procedures for the
approval of new transaction types and markets, price
verification, periodic review of profit and loss, and review of
valuation models by personnel with appropriate technical
knowledge of relevant products and markets. These procedures are
performed by personnel independent of the trading and investing
functions. For valuations that require inputs with little or no
market observability, AIG compares the results of its valuation
models to actual subsequent transactions.
Operating Review
General Insurance Operations
AIGs General Insurance subsidiaries are multiple line
companies writing substantially all lines of property and
casualty insurance and various personal lines both domestically
and abroad and constitute the AIG Property Casualty Group
(formerly known as Domestic General Insurance) and the Foreign
General Insurance Group.
AIG Property Casualty Group is comprised of Commercial
Insurance, Transatlantic, Personal Lines and Mortgage Guaranty
businesses.
Commercial Insurance writes substantially all classes of
business insurance, accepting such business mainly from
insurance brokers. This provides Commercial Insurance the
opportunity to select specialized markets and retain
underwriting control. Any licensed broker is able to submit
business to Commercial Insurance without the traditional
agent-company contractual relationship, but such broker usually
has no authority to commit Commercial Insurance to accept a risk.
Transatlantic Holdings, Inc. (Transatlantic) subsidiaries offer
reinsurance capacity on both a treaty and facultative basis both
in the U.S. and abroad. Transatlantic structures programs for a
full range of property and casualty products with an emphasis on
specialty risk.
AIGs Personal Lines operations provide automobile
insurance through aigdirect.com, its direct marketing
distribution channel, and the Agency Auto Division, its
independent agent/broker distribution channel. It also
53
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
provides a broad range of coverages for high net worth
individuals through the AIG Private Client Group (Private Client
Group). Coverages for the Personal Lines operations are written
predominantly in the United States.
The main business of the subsidiaries of UGC is the issuance of
residential mortgage guaranty insurance, both domestically and
internationally, that covers the first loss for credit defaults
on high loan-to-value
conventional first-lien mortgages for the purchase or refinance
of one to four family residences. UGC subsidiaries also write
second-lien and private student loan guaranty insurance.
AIGs Foreign General Insurance Group writes both
commercial and consumer lines of insurance which is primarily
underwritten through American International Underwriters (AIU),
a marketing unit consisting of wholly owned agencies and
insurance companies. The Foreign General Insurance Group also
includes business written by AIGs foreign-based insurance
subsidiaries.
54
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
General Insurance Results
General Insurance operating income is comprised of statutory
underwriting profit (loss), changes in DAC, net investment
income and net realized capital gains and losses. Operating
income, as well as net premiums written, net premiums earned,
net investment income and net realized capital gains (losses)
and statutory ratios were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
Percentage | |
|
June 30, | |
|
Percentage | |
|
|
| |
|
Increase/ | |
|
| |
|
Increase/ | |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
| |
Net premiums written:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG Property Casualty Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Insurance
|
|
$ |
5,988 |
|
|
$ |
6,439 |
|
|
|
(7 |
)% |
|
$ |
11,101 |
|
|
$ |
12,448 |
|
|
|
(11 |
)% |
|
|
Transatlantic
|
|
|
988 |
|
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2,024 |
|
|
|
1,967 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
Personal Lines
|
|
|
1,230 |
|
|
|
1,203 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2,518 |
|
|
|
2,432 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
Mortgage Guaranty
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
Foreign General Insurance
|
|
|
3,726 |
|
|
|
3,242 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
8,065 |
|
|
|
6,860 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
12,220 |
|
|
$ |
12,139 |
|
|
|
1% |
|
|
$ |
24,300 |
|
|
$ |
24,245 |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
Net premiums earned:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG Property Casualty Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Insurance
|
|
$ |
5,912 |
|
|
$ |
5,996 |
|
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
$ |
11,329 |
|
|
$ |
11,977 |
|
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
|
Transatlantic
|
|
|
1,023 |
|
|
|
948 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
2,040 |
|
|
|
1,913 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
Personal Lines
|
|
|
1,209 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2,408 |
|
|
|
2,323 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
Mortgage Guaranty
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
Foreign General Insurance
|
|
|
3,740 |
|
|
|
3,030 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
7,208 |
|
|
|
5,938 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
12,153 |
|
|
$ |
11,363 |
|
|
|
7% |
|
|
$ |
23,510 |
|
|
$ |
22,582 |
|
|
|
4% |
|
|
Net investment income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG Property Casualty Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Insurance
|
|
$ |
587 |
|
|
$ |
984 |
|
|
|
(40 |
)% |
|
$ |
1,330 |
|
|
$ |
2,017 |
|
|
|
(34 |
)% |
|
|
Transatlantic
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
Personal Lines
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
Mortgage Guaranty
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
Foreign General Insurance
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
Reclassifications and eliminations
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,167 |
|
|
$ |
1,628 |
|
|
|
(28 |
)% |
|
$ |
2,372 |
|
|
$ |
3,191 |
|
|
|
(26 |
)% |
|
Net realized capital gains (losses)
|
|
$ |
(563 |
) |
|
$ |
(63 |
) |
|
|
% |
|
|
$ |
(836 |
) |
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG Property Casualty Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Insurance
|
|
$ |
381 |
|
|
$ |
1,904 |
|
|
|
(80 |
)% |
|
$ |
1,166 |
|
|
$ |
3,833 |
|
|
|
(70 |
)% |
|
|
Transatlantic
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
Personal Lines
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
Mortgage Guaranty
|
|
|
(518 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(872 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign General Insurance
|
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
1,532 |
|
|
|
1,776 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
Reclassifications and eliminations
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
827 |
|
|
$ |
2,976 |
|
|
|
(72 |
)% |
|
$ |
2,164 |
|
|
$ |
6,072 |
|
|
|
(64 |
)% |
|
Statutory underwriting profit
(loss)(b):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG Property Casualty Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Insurance
|
|
$ |
357 |
|
|
$ |
946 |
|
|
|
(62 |
)% |
|
$ |
575 |
|
|
$ |
1,730 |
|
|
|
(67 |
)% |
|
|
Transatlantic
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
Personal Lines
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Guaranty
|
|
|
(564 |
) |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(971 |
) |
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign General Insurance
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
773 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
260 |
|
|
$ |
1,284 |
|
|
|
(80 |
)% |
|
$ |
426 |
|
|
$ |
2,477 |
|
|
|
(83 |
)% |
|
AIG Property Casualty Group:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Ratio
|
|
|
80.6 |
|
|
|
68.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79.6 |
|
|
|
68.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense Ratio
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
|
|
20.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined Ratio
|
|
|
102.0 |
|
|
|
87.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102.4 |
|
|
|
88.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign General Insurance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Ratio
|
|
|
53.7 |
|
|
|
52.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52.8 |
|
|
|
51.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense
Ratio(a)
|
|
|
34.6 |
|
|
|
33.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
30.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio
|
|
|
88.3 |
|
|
|
85.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85.0 |
|
|
|
82.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Ratio
|
|
|
72.3 |
|
|
|
63.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71.4 |
|
|
|
64.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense Ratio
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
23.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined Ratio
|
|
|
97.7 |
|
|
|
87.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97.3 |
|
|
|
87.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Includes amortization of advertising costs. |
(b) |
Statutory underwriting profit (loss) is a measure that
U.S. domiciled insurance companies are required to report
to their regulatory authorities. The following table reconciles
statutory underwriting profit (loss) to operating income for
General Insurance: |
55
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Foreign | |
|
|
|
|
Commercial | |
|
|
|
Personal | |
|
Mortgage | |
|
General | |
|
Reclassifications | |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Insurance | |
|
Transatlantic | |
|
Lines | |
|
Guaranty | |
|
Insurance | |
|
and Eliminations | |
|
Total | |
| |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statutory underwriting profit (loss)
|
|
$ |
357 |
|
|
$ |
66 |
|
|
$ |
(42 |
) |
|
$ |
(564 |
) |
|
$ |
443 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
260 |
|
|
Increase (decrease) in DAC
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,167 |
|
|
Net realized capital gains (losses)
|
|
|
(562 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(563 |
) |
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$ |
381 |
|
|
$ |
141 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
(518 |
) |
|
$ |
796 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
827 |
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statutory underwriting profit (loss)
|
|
$ |
946 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
56 |
|
|
$ |
(126 |
) |
|
$ |
371 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,284 |
|
|
Increase (decrease) in DAC
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1,628 |
|
|
Net realized capital gains (losses)
|
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$ |
1,904 |
|
|
$ |
168 |
|
|
$ |
118 |
|
|
$ |
(81 |
) |
|
$ |
867 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,976 |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statutory underwriting profit (loss)
|
|
$ |
575 |
|
|
$ |
120 |
|
|
$ |
(105 |
) |
|
$ |
(971 |
) |
|
$ |
807 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
426 |
|
|
Increase (decrease) in DAC
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2,372 |
|
|
Net realized capital gains (losses)
|
|
|
(735 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(836 |
) |
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$ |
1,166 |
|
|
$ |
303 |
|
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
(872 |
) |
|
$ |
1,532 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
2,164 |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statutory underwriting profit (loss)
|
|
$ |
1,730 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
$ |
(168 |
) |
|
$ |
773 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,477 |
|
|
Increase (decrease) in DAC
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
2,017 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3,191 |
|
|
Net realized capital gains (losses)
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
58 |
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$ |
3,833 |
|
|
$ |
319 |
|
|
$ |
224 |
|
|
$ |
(73 |
) |
|
$ |
1,776 |
|
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
6,072 |
|
|
AIG transacts business in most major foreign currencies. The
effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on the
growth of General Insurance net premiums written were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Six Months | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
Growth in original currency*
|
|
|
(2.2 |
)% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
(2.8 |
)% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
Foreign exchange effect
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
Growth as reported in U.S. dollars
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
* Computed using a constant exchange rate throughout
each period.
Quarterly General Insurance Results
General Insurance operating income decreased in the three-month
period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in
2007 due to declines in both underwriting profit and net
investment income as well as increased net realized capital
losses in the three month-period ended June 30, 2008. The
combined ratio for the three-month period ended June 30,
2008 increased to 97.7, an increase of 10.6 points compared
to the same period in 2007, primarily due to an increase in the
loss ratio of 8.4 points. The loss ratio for accident year
2008 recorded in the three-month period ended June 30, 2008
was 6.2 points higher than the loss ratio recorded in the
three-month period ended June 30, 2007 for accident year
2007. Increases in Mortgage Guaranty losses accounted for 3.6
points of the increase in the 2008 accident year loss ratio. The
downward cycle in the U.S. housing market is not expected
to improve until residential inventories return to a more normal
level, and AIG expects that this downward cycle will continue to
adversely affect Mortgage Guarantys loss ratios for the
foreseeable future. The loss ratio also increased for other
property and casualty lines due to premium rate decreases and
changes in loss trends. Unfavorable prior year development
increased incurred losses by $93 million in the three-month
period ended June 30, 2008 while favorable prior year
development decreased incurred losses by $87 million in the
three-month period ended June 30, 2007, accounting for 1.5
points of the increase in the loss ratio.
General Insurance net premiums written increased in the
three-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same
period in 2007, as a decline in Commercial Insurance resulting
from declining rates was offset by growth in Foreign General
Insurance from both established and new distribution channels,
and the positive effect of changes in foreign currency exchange
rates.
General Insurance net investment income declined in the
three-month period ended June 30, 2008 by $461 million
compared to the same period in 2007. Interest and dividend
income increased $60 million in the three-month period ended
June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 as
investments in fixed maturities and equity securities increased
by $9.0 billion and the average yield was substantially
unchanged for both periods. Income from partnership and mutual
fund investments declined $413 million in the three-month
period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in
2007, primarily due to weaker equity market performance in 2008.
Net
realized capital losses in the three-month period ended
June 30, 2008 include other-than-temporary
56
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
impairment charges of $685 million principally on fixed
maturity securities, compared to $84 million in the same
period of 2007. See also Capital Resources and Liquidity and
Invested Assets herein.
Year-to-Date General
Insurance Results
General Insurance operating income decreased in the six-month
period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in
2007 due to declines in both underwriting profit and net
investment income as well as net realized capital losses in the
six month-period ended June 30, 2008 compared to net
realized capital gains in the same period in 2007. The combined
ratio for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008
increased to 97.3, an increase of 10.0 points compared to
the same period in 2007, primarily due to an increase in the
loss ratio of 7.4 points. The loss ratio for accident year 2008
recorded in the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 was
5.2 points higher than the loss ratio recorded in the six-month
period ended June 30, 2007 for accident year 2007.
Increases in Mortgage Guaranty losses accounted for 3.3 points
of the increase in the 2008 accident year loss ratio. The loss
ratio also increased for other property and casualty lines due
to premium rate decreases and changes in loss trends. Favorable
development from prior years and increases in the loss reserve
discount reduced incurred losses by $84 million and
$342 million in the six-month periods ended June 30,
2008 and 2007, respectively. The favorable development in the
six-month period ended June 30, 2008 includes
$339 million of favorable development recognized in the
first three months of 2008, related to policies whose premiums
vary with the level of losses incurred (loss sensitive
policies). Loss sensitive policies did not have a significant
effect in 2007. The favorable development on loss sensitive
policies had no effect on underwriting profit as it was entirely
offset by a reduction in earned premiums. The reduction in
incurred losses and earned premiums resulting from loss
sensitive policies reduced the loss ratio by 0.4 points
compared to the same period in 2007. Other unfavorable loss
development, partially offset by increases in the loss reserve
discount for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008,
increased incurred losses by $255 million, accounting for
2.6 points of the increase in the loss ratio compared to
the same period of 2007. Favorable loss development in the
six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, of $37
million and $50 million, respectively (recognized in
consolidation and related to certain asbestos settlements),
reduced overall incurred losses.
General Insurance net premiums written were essentially
unchanged in the six-month period ended June 30, 2008
compared to the same period in 2007, as a decline in Commercial
Insurance rates was offset by growth in Foreign General
Insurance from both established and new distribution channels;
the positive effect of changes in foreign currency exchange
rates; and, to a lesser extent, growth in the Private Client
Group of Personal Lines and in Mortgage Guaranty.
General Insurance net investment income declined in the
six-month period ended June 30, 2008 by $819 million
compared to the same period in 2007. Interest and dividend
income increased $169 million in the six-month period ended
June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 as
investment in fixed maturities and equity securities increased
by $9.0 billion and the average yield was substantially
unchanged for both periods. Income from partnership and mutual
fund investments declined $937 million in the six-month
period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in
2007, primarily due to poor performance in the equity markets in
2008. Investment expenses declined $55 million the
six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same
period in 2007, primarily due to decreased interest expense on
deposit liabilities.
Net realized capital losses in the six-month period ended
June 30, 2008 include other-than-temporary impairment
charges of $840 million compared to $130 million in
the same period of 2007. See also Capital Resources and
Liquidity and Invested Assets herein.
Quarterly Commercial Insurance Results
Commercial Insurances operating income decreased in the
three-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same
period in 2007 primarily due to declines in both underwriting
profit and net investment income as well as increased net
realized capital losses in the three-month period ended
June 30, 2008. The decline is also reflected in the
combined ratio, which increased 10.8 points in the
three-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same
period in 2007. The loss ratio for accident year 2008, recorded
in the three-month period ended June 30, 2008 was
5.1 points higher than the loss ratio recorded in the
three-month period ended June 30, 2007 for accident year
2007. The increase in the 2008 accident year loss ratio includes
1.4 points for losses related to the Midwest floods with the
remaining increase due to higher casualty losses and the effect
of premium rate declines and several large fire losses.
Unfavorable prior year development increased incurred losses by
$75 million in the three-month period ended June 30,
2008 while favorable prior year development decreased incurred
losses by $65 million in the three-month period ended
June 30, 2007, accounting for 2.3 points of the increase in
the loss ratio. Increases in the loss reserve discount reduced
incurred losses by $50 million and $125 million in the
three-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, accounting for 1.2 points of the increase in the
loss ratio. Commercial Insurances net premiums written
declined in the three-month period ended June 30, 2008
compared to the same period in 2007 primarily due to declines in
workers compensation premiums and other casualty lines of
business.
57
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Commercial Insurances expense ratio increased to 19.6 in
the three-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to 17.5
in the same period of 2007. The increase in the expense ratio
was due to changes in property reinsurance programs, increases
in the provision for uncollectible premiums and changes in the
mix of business. The 2008 property reinsurance programs include
more excess of loss treaties, which have little or no ceding
commissions, and less pro rata treaties, which have ceding
commissions, compared to the 2007 property reinsurance programs.
Provision for uncollectible premiums increased by
$39 million in the three-month period ended June 30,
2008 compared to the same period in 2007, primarily due to
increased provisions for uncollectible workers
compensation premium receivables. In general, net premiums
written increased in lines of business with higher expense
ratios and lower loss ratios compared to other Commercial
Insurance lines of business, contributing to the increase in the
expense ratio for the three-month period ended June 30,
2008 compared to the same period in 2007. In addition,
Commercial Insurance continued to invest in systems and process
improvements to enhance operating efficiency and controls over
the long term.
Commercial Insurances net investment income declined in
the three-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the
same period in 2007, primarily due to a decline in income from
partnership and mutual fund investments which decreased
$290 million in the three-month period ended June 30,
2008 compared to the same period in 2007.
Commercial Insurance recorded net realized capital losses in
the three-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to net
realized capital gains in the same period of 2007, primarily due
to other-than-temporary impairment charges of $632 million
in the three-month period ended June 30, 2008, principally
related to fixed maturity securities, compared to $77 million in
the same period in 2007.
Year-to-Date
Commercial Insurance Results
Commercial Insurances operating income decreased in the
six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same
period in 2007, primarily due to declines in both underwriting
profit and net investment income, as well as net realized
capital losses in the six-month period ended June 30, 2008.
The decline is also reflected in the combined ratio, which
increased 10.6 points in the six-month period ended
June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. The loss
ratio for accident year 2008 recorded in the six-month period
ended June 30, 2008 included a 1.4 point effect
related to the Atlanta tornado and Midwest flood catastrophe
losses, and was 4.4 points higher than the loss ratio
recorded in the six-month period ended June 30, 2007 for
accident year 2007. Prior year development and increases in the
loss reserve discount reduced incurred losses by
$192 million and $276 million in the six-month periods
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The favorable
development for 2008 includes $339 million of favorable
development related to loss sensitive polices. The favorable
development on loss sensitive policies had no effect on
underwriting profit as the reduction in incurred losses was
entirely offset by a reduction in earned premiums. However, the
reductions in both earned premiums and incurred losses accounted
for a reduction in the loss ratio of 0.8 points compared to the
same period of 2007 related to loss sensitive policies. Other
unfavorable loss development less the increase in the loss
reserve discount resulted in a net increase in incurred losses
of $147 million, accounting for 3.6 points of the
increase in the loss ratio compared to the same period in 2007.
Commercial Insurances net premiums written declined in the
six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same
period in 2007 primarily due to declines in workers
compensation premiums and the effect of the loss sensitive
policies described above and other casualty lines of business.
Commercial Insurances expense ratio increased to 21.6 in
the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to 18.3
in the same period of 2007. Return premiums on loss sensitive
policies reduced net premiums written, without a corresponding
reduction in expenses, increasing the expense ratio by
0.6 points for the six-month period ended June 30,
2008 compared to the same period in 2007. The remaining increase
in the expense ratio primarily resulted from changes in property
reinsurance programs, increases in the provision for
uncollectible premiums and changes in the mix of business as
discussed above.
Commercial Insurances net investment income declined in
the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the
same period in 2007, primarily due to a decline in income from
partnership and mutual fund investments which decreased
$699 million in the six-month period ended June 30,
2008 compared to the same period in 2007.
Commercial Insurance recorded net realized capital losses in the
six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to net
realized capital gains in the same period in 2007, primarily due
to other-than-temporary impairment charges of $776 million
in the six-month period ended June 30, 2008, related to
both fixed maturity and equity securities, compared to
$113 million in the same period in 2007.
Quarterly Transatlantic Results
Transatlantics operating income decreased in the
three-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same
period in 2007, primarily due to an increase in net realized
capital losses, partially offset by an increase in statutory
underwriting profit. The increase in net realized capital losses
is due principally to other-than-temporary impairment charges
primarily related to domestic residential asset-backed fixed
maturity securities and, to a much lesser extent, equity
securities. The increase in statutory underwriting profit in the
three-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the
58
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
same period in 2007 reflects improved underwriting results in
domestic operations.
Year-to-Date Transatlantic Results
Transatlantics operating income decreased in the six-month
period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in
2007 primarily due to an increase in net realized capital
losses, partially offset by an increase in statutory
underwriting profit. The increase in net realized capital losses
is due principally to other-than-temporary impairment charges
primarily related to domestic residential asset-backed fixed
maturity securities and, to a much lesser extent, equity
securities. The increase in statutory underwriting profit in the
six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same
period in 2007 reflects improved underwriting results in
domestic and international operations. The 2007 international
underwriting results were adversely affected by European
windstorm related losses.
Quarterly Personal Lines Results
Personal Lines operating income decreased in the three-month
period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in
2007 due to a deterioration in underwriting performance as
reflected by the combined ratio, which increased to 103.0 in the
three-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to 94.5 in
the same period in 2007. The loss ratio increased
6.5 points, including an increase in the 2008 accident year
loss ratio of 1.4 points, due primarily to an increase in
the accident year loss ratio for automobile policies, partially
offset by a decline in the accident year loss ratio for the
Private Client Group. The 2008 accident year loss ratio for
automobile polices increased 3.6 points compared to the loss
ratio recorded in the three-month period ended June 30,
2007 for the 2007 accident year, due to declining premium rates
and increased frequency and severity of losses. Prior year loss
development increased incurred losses by $29 million in the
three-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to a
reduction of $32 million in the same period in 2007,
accounting for 5.1 points of the increase in the loss ratio. The
current period adverse loss development on prior years is
primarily related to greater than expected bodily injury
severity and property damage frequency.
The expense ratio increased 2.0 points in the three-month period
ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007,
primarily due to a change in business mix as the Private Client
Group, which carries a higher expense ratio, represented an
increased percentage of the Personal Lines divisions net
premiums written. Additionally, a decrease to ceding commissions
as a result of a restructured reinsurance program, integration
costs relating to 21st Century Insurance Group (21st Century)
and a litigation charge contributed to the overall increase in
the expense ratio.
Net premiums written increased in the three-month period ended
June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007,
primarily due to continued growth in the Private Client Group,
partially offset by reductions in both the aigdirect.com and
Agency Auto businesses. The growth in the Private Client Group
reflects the execution of a plan to expand its distribution
network. Since June 2007, the Private Client Group has expanded
its agency network by 23 percent. Additionally, the Private
Client Groups net premiums written increased as a result
of a restructured reinsurance program which decreased premiums
ceded to reinsurers. The decrease in the aigdirect.com and
Agency Auto business reflects the effects of planned reductions
in these lines as the underlying loss experience has
deteriorated.
Year-to-Date Personal Lines Results
Personal Lines operating income decreased in the six-month
period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in
2007 due to a deterioration in underwriting performance as
reflected by the combined ratio, which increased to 103.2 in the
six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to 95.0 in
the same period in 2007. The loss ratio increased
7.5 points, including an increase in the 2008 accident year
loss ratio of 2.2 points due to an increase in the accident
year loss ratio for automobile policies. The 2008 accident year
loss ratio for automobile polices increased 3.7 points compared
to the loss ratio recorded in the six-month period ended
June 30, 2007 for the 2007 accident year, due to declining
premium rates and increased frequency and severity of losses.
Prior year development increased incurred losses by
$65 million in the six-month period ended June 30,
2008 compared to a reduction of $61 million in the same
period in 2007, accounting for 5.3 points of the increase in the
loss ratio. The current period adverse loss development on prior
years is primarily related to greater than expected bodily
injury severity and property damage frequency.
The expense ratio increased 0.7 points in the six-month
period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in
2007, primarily due to a change in business mix as the Private
Client Group, which carries a higher expense ratio, represented
an increased percentage of the Personal Lines divisions
net premiums written. Also, a decrease to ceding commissions as
a result of a restructured reinsurance program, integration
costs relating to 21st Century and a litigation charge
contributed to the increase in the expense ratio.
Net premiums written increased in the six-month period ended
June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007,
primarily due to continued growth in the Private Client Group,
partially offset by reductions in both the aigdirect.com and
Agency Auto businesses. The growth in the Private Client Group
reflects the execution of a plan to expand the distribution
network. Additionally, the Private Client Groups net
premiums written increased as a result of a
59
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
restructured reinsurance program which decreased premiums ceded
to reinsurers. The decrease in the aigdirect.com and Agency Auto
business reflect the effects of planned reductions in these
lines as the underlying loss experience has deteriorated.
Quarterly Mortgage Guaranty Results
Mortgage Guarantys operating loss in the three-month
period ended June 30, 2008 increased compared to the same
period in 2007 as the deteriorating U.S. residential
housing market adversely affected losses incurred for both the
domestic first- and second-lien businesses. Historically, a
large percentage of reported defaults were cured
resulting in no loss to UGC. A cure can occur when a borrower
brings the mortgage current, refinances the existing mortgage,
sells the home and pays off the current balance or enters into a
payment plan with the lender to bring the mortgage current. In
the current market, loans are less likely to cure, increasing
the probability that a defaulted loan will result in a claim
payment. UGC has reflected that lower cure probability in its
current estimate of unpaid losses resulting in higher loss
reserves and an increase in incurred losses. Domestic first- and
second-lien losses incurred increased 264 percent and
107 percent respectively, compared to the same period in
2007, resulting in loss ratios of 253.9 and 556.0, respectively,
in the three-month period ended June 30, 2008. Increases in
domestic losses incurred resulted in an overall loss ratio of
292.0 in the three-month period ended June 30, 2008
compared to 129.9 in the same period in 2007.
Net premiums written increased in the three-month period ended
June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007,
primarily due to growth in domestic first-lien premiums as a
result of the increased use of mortgage insurance for credit
enhancement as well as a higher persistency rate. UGC has taken
steps to strengthen its underwriting guidelines and increase
rates. It also discontinued new production for certain programs
in the second-lien business beginning in the fourth quarter of
2006. However, UGC will continue to receive renewal premiums on
that portfolio for the life of the loans, estimated to be three
to five years, and will continue to be exposed to losses from
future defaults.
The expense ratio in the three-month period ended June 30,
2008 was 16.5, down from 22.4 in the same period of 2007 as
expenses declined 22 percent. UGC has tightened its
monitoring and control over expenses in response to the adverse
conditions in the U.S. residential housing market,
resulting in the decline in operating expenses and the related
expense ratio.
UGC domestic mortgage risk in force totaled $31.8 billion
as of June 30, 2008 and the
60-day delinquency
ratio was 4.9 percent (based on number of policies,
consistent with mortgage industry practice) compared to domestic
mortgage risk in force of $26.5 billion and a delinquency
ratio of 2.5 percent at June 30, 2007. Approximately
83 percent of the domestic mortgage risk is secured by
first-lien, owner-occupied properties.
Year-to-Date
Mortgage Guaranty Results
Mortgage Guarantys operating loss in the six-month period
ended June 30, 2008 increased compared to the same period
in 2007 as the deteriorating U.S. residential housing
market adversely affected losses incurred for both the domestic
first- and second-lien businesses. Domestic first- and
second-lien losses incurred increased 302 percent and
113 percent respectively, compared to the six-month period
ended June 30, 2007, resulting in loss ratios of 229.0 and
500.7, respectively, in the six-month period ended June 30,
2008. Increases in domestic losses incurred resulted in an
overall loss ratio of 264.5 in the six-month period ended
June 30, 2008 compared to 111.5 in the six-month period
ended June 30, 2007.
Net premiums written increased in the six-month period ended
June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007,
primarily due to growth in domestic first-lien premiums due to
the increased use of mortgage insurance for credit enhancement
as well as a higher persistency rate.
The expense ratio in the six-month period ended June 30,
2008 was 18.2 percent, down from 22.1 percent in the
same period in 2007 as premium growth combined with a
9 percent reduction in expenses resulted in the decline in
the expense ratio.
Quarterly Foreign General Insurance Results
Foreign General Insurance operating income decreased in the
three-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same
period in 2007, primarily due to a decrease in both underwriting
profit and net investment income.
Net premiums written increased 15 percent (5 percent
in original currency) in the three-month period ended
June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007,
reflecting growth in commercial and consumer lines driven by new
business from both established and new distribution channels,
including the late 2007 acquisition of Württembergische und
Badische Versicherungs AG (WüBa) in Germany.
Net premiums written for commercial lines increased due to new
business, mainly in European markets, and decreases in the use
of reinsurance, partially offset by declines in premium rates.
Aviation production increased due to improved account retention
and increased production in the space aviation business. Net
premiums written for the Lloyds syndicate continued to
decline due to rate decreases and increased market competition.
The loss ratio in the three-month period ended June 30,
2008 increased 1.5 points compared to the same period in
60
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
2007, primarily due to an increase in severe but non-catastrophe
losses and higher loss frequency in the current accident year.
Partially offsetting these increases was a 2.1 point loss
ratio improvement due to $67 million of catastrophe losses
in the prior year period with no significant catastrophe losses
in the current period.
The expense ratio in the three-month period ended June 30,
2008 increased 1.3 points compared to the same period in
2007. This increase reflects the cost of realigning certain
legal entities through which Foreign General Insurance operates,
and the increased significance of consumer lines of business,
which have higher acquisition costs. AIG expects the expense
ratio to continue to increase in 2008 due to the cost of
realigning certain legal entities through which Foreign General
Insurance operates.
Net investment income decreased in the three-month period ended
June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. Mutual
fund income was $67 million lower than the three-month
period ended June 30, 2007 reflecting weaker performance in
the equity markets in 2008, partially offset by higher interest
and dividend income of $41 million.
Year-to-Date Foreign
General Insurance Results
Foreign General Insurance operating income decreased in the
six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same
period in 2007, primarily due to decreases in net investment
income and net realized capital losses.
Net premiums written increased 18 percent (8 percent
in original currency) in the six-month period ended
June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007,
reflecting strong growth in commercial and consumer lines driven
by new business from both established and new distribution
channels, including the WüBa acquisition. Net premiums
written for commercial lines increased due to new business in
the U.K. and Europe and decreases in the use of reinsurance,
partially offset by declines in premium rates. Growth in
personal accident business in Latin America, Asia and Europe
also contributed to the increase. Net premiums written for the
Lloyds syndicate Ascot continued to decline due to rate
decreases and increased market competition.
The loss ratio in the six-month period ended June 30, 2008
increased 1.4 points compared to the same period in 2007.
Prior accident year development reduced incurred losses by
$16 million and $68 million in the first six months of
2008 and 2007, respectively, accounting for 0.9 points of
the increase. The current accident year loss ratio excluding
catastrophe losses increased by 1.6 points primarily due to
higher severe but non-catastrophe losses and higher loss
frequency. Partially offsetting this increase in loss ratio is
$67 million of catastrophe losses in the prior year period
with no significant catastrophe losses in the current period,
resulting in a loss ratio decrease of 1.1 points.
The expense ratio in the six-month period ended June 30,
2008 increased 1.4 points compared to the same period in
2007 reflecting the continued cost of realigning certain legal
entities through which Foreign General Insurance operates, and
the increased significance of consumer lines of business, which
have higher acquisition costs.
Net investment income decreased in the six-month period ended
June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. Mutual
fund income was $172 million lower than the six-month
period ended June 30, 2007, reflecting weaker performance
in the equity markets in 2008, partially offset by higher
interest and dividend income of $70 million.
Reserve for Losses and Loss Expenses
The following table presents the components of the General
Insurance gross reserve for losses and loss expenses (loss
reserves) by major lines of business on a statutory Annual
Statement basis*:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
(in millions) |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
Other liability occurrence
|
|
$ |
21,233 |
|
|
$ |
20,580 |
|
Workers compensation
|
|
|
15,234 |
|
|
|
15,568 |
|
Other liability claims made
|
|
|
13,896 |
|
|
|
13,878 |
|
International
|
|
|
8,372 |
|
|
|
7,036 |
|
Auto liability
|
|
|
6,240 |
|
|
|
6,068 |
|
Property
|
|
|
4,554 |
|
|
|
4,274 |
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
3,395 |
|
|
|
3,127 |
|
Products liability
|
|
|
2,430 |
|
|
|
2,416 |
|
Medical malpractice
|
|
|
2,307 |
|
|
|
2,361 |
|
Mortgage guaranty/credit
|
|
|
2,291 |
|
|
|
1,426 |
|
Accident and health
|
|
|
1,831 |
|
|
|
1,818 |
|
Commercial multiple peril
|
|
|
1,796 |
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
Aircraft
|
|
|
1,725 |
|
|
|
1,623 |
|
Fidelity/surety
|
|
|
1,221 |
|
|
|
1,222 |
|
Other
|
|
|
2,222 |
|
|
|
2,203 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
88,747 |
|
|
$ |
85,500 |
|
|
|
|
* |
Presented by lines of business pursuant to statutory
reporting requirements as prescribed by the National Association
of Insurance Commissioners. |
AIGs gross reserve for losses and loss expenses represents
the accumulation of estimates of ultimate losses, including
estimates for incurred but not yet reported reserves
(IBNR) and loss expenses. The methods used to determine
loss reserve estimates and to establish the resulting reserves
are continually reviewed and updated. Any adjustments resulting
therefrom are currently reflected in operating income. Because
loss reserve estimates are subject to the outcome of future
events, changes in estimates are unavoidable given that loss
trends vary and time is often required for changes in trends to
be recognized and confirmed. Reserve changes that increase
previous estimates of ultimate cost are referred to as
unfavorable or adverse development or reserve strengthening.
Reserve changes that decrease previous estimates of ultimate
cost are referred to as favorable development.
61
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Estimates for mortgage guaranty insurance losses and loss
adjustment expense reserves are based on notices of mortgage
loan delinquencies and estimates of delinquencies that have been
incurred but have not been reported by loan servicers, based
upon historical reporting trends. Mortgage Guaranty establishes
reserves using a percentage of the contractual liability (for
each delinquent loan reported) that is based upon past
experience regarding certain loan factors such as age of the
delinquency, cure rates, dollar amount of the loan and type of
mortgage loan. Because mortgage delinquencies and claims
payments are affected primarily by macroeconomic events, such as
changes in home price appreciation or depreciation, interest
rates and unemployment, the determination of the ultimate loss
cost requires a high degree of judgment. AIG believes it has
provided appropriate reserves for currently delinquent loans.
Consistent with industry practice, AIG does not establish a
reserve for insured loans that are not currently delinquent, but
that may become delinquent in future periods.
At June 30, 2008, General Insurance net loss reserves
increased $3.04 billion from the prior year-end to
$72.33 billion. The net loss reserves represent loss
reserves reduced by reinsurance recoverable, net of an allowance
for unrecoverable reinsurance and applicable discount for future
investment income.
The following table classifies the components of the General
Insurance net loss reserve by business unit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
(in millions) |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
Commercial
Insurance(a)
|
|
|
$48,443 |
|
|
|
$47,392 |
|
Transatlantic
|
|
|
7,317 |
|
|
|
6,900 |
|
Personal
Lines(b)
|
|
|
2,448 |
|
|
|
2,417 |
|
Mortgage Guaranty
|
|
|
2,057 |
|
|
|
1,339 |
|
Foreign General
Insurance(c)
|
|
|
12,066 |
|
|
|
11,240 |
|
|
Total Net Loss Reserve
|
|
|
$72,331 |
|
|
|
$69,288 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, Commercial
Insurance loss reserves include approximately $2.89 billion
and $3.13 billion, respectively, ($3.08 billion and
$3.34 billion, respectively, before discount), related to
business written by Commercial Insurance but ceded to American
International Reinsurance Company Limited (AIRCO) and
reported in AIRCOs statutory filings. Commercial Insurance
loss reserves also include approximately $648 million and
$590 million related to business included in AIUOs
statutory filings at June 30, 2008 and December 31,
2007, respectively. |
(b) |
At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, Personal
Lines loss reserves include $1.03 billion and
$894 million, respectively, related to business ceded to
Commercial Insurance and reported in Commercial Insurances
statutory filings. |
(c) |
At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, Foreign
General Insurance loss reserves include approximately
$2.04 billion and $3.02 billion, respectively, related
to business reported in Commercial Insurances statutory
filings. |
The Commercial Insurance net loss reserve is comprised
principally of the business of AIG subsidiaries participating in
the American Home Assurance Company (American Home)/ National
Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. (National Union)
pool (10 companies) and the surplus lines pool (Lexington
Insurance Company, AIG Excess Liability Insurance Company and
Landmark Insurance Company).
Commercial Insurance cedes a quota share percentage of its other
liability occurrence and products liability occurrence business
to AIRCO. The quota share percentage ceded was 10 percent
in the six-month period ended 2008 and 15 percent in 2007
and covered all business written in these years for these lines
by participants in the American Home/ National Union pool.
AIRCOs loss reserves relating to these quota share
cessions from Commercial Insurance are recorded on a discounted
basis. As of June 30, 2008, AIRCO carried a discount of
approximately $190 million applicable to the
$3.08 billion in undiscounted reserves it assumed from the
American Home/ National Union pool via this quota share cession.
AIRCO also carries approximately $532 million in net loss
reserves relating to Foreign General Insurance business. These
reserves are carried on an undiscounted basis.
The companies participating in the American Home/ National Union
pool have maintained a participation in the business written by
AIU for decades. As of June 30, 2008, these AIU reserves
carried by participants in the American Home/ National Union
pool totaled approximately $2.04 billion. The remaining
Foreign General Insurance reserves are carried by American
International Underwriter Overseas, Ltd. (AIUO), AIRCO, AIG
U.K., and other smaller AIG subsidiaries domiciled outside the
United States. Statutory filings in the United States by AIG
companies reflect all the business written by
U.S. domiciled entities only, and therefore exclude
business written by AIUO, AIRCO, and all other internationally
domiciled subsidiaries. The total reserves carried at
June 30, 2008 by AIUO and AIRCO were approximately
$3.63 billion and $3.42 billion, respectively.
AIRCOs $3.42 billion in total general insurance
reserves consist of approximately $2.89 billion from
business assumed from the American Home/ National Union pool and
an additional $532 million relating to Foreign General
Insurance business.
Discounting of Reserves
At June 30, 2008, AIGs overall General Insurance net
loss reserves reflect a loss reserve discount of
$2.48 billion, including tabular and non-tabular
calculations. The tabular workers compensation discount is
calculated using a 3.5 percent interest rate and the
1979-81 Decennial Mortality Table. The non-tabular workers
compensation discount is calculated separately for companies
domiciled in New York and Pennsylvania, and follows the
statutory regulations for each state. For New York companies,
the discount is based on a five percent interest rate and the
companies own payout patterns. For Pennsylvania companies,
the statute has specified discount factors for accident years
2001 and prior, which are based on a six percent interest rate
and an industry payout pattern. For accident years 2002 and
subsequent, the
62
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
discount is based on the yield of U.S. Treasury securities
ranging from one to twenty years and the companies own
payout patterns, with the future expected payment for each year
using the interest rate associated with the corresponding
Treasury security yield for that time period. The discount is
comprised of the following: $794 million tabular
discount for workers compensation in Commercial Insurance;
$1.49 billion non-tabular discount for
workers compensation in Commercial Insurance; and
$190 million non-tabular discount for other
liability occurrence and products liability occurrence in AIRCO.
The total undiscounted workers compensation loss reserve
carried by Commercial Insurance is approximately
$13.5 billion as of June 30, 2008. The other liability
occurrence and products liability occurrence business in AIRCO
that is assumed from Commercial Insurance is discounted based on
the yield of U.S. Treasury securities ranging from one to
twenty years and the Commercial Insurance payout pattern for
this business. The undiscounted reserves assumed by AIRCO from
Commercial Insurance totaled approximately $3.08 billion at
June 30, 2008.
Quarterly Reserving Process
AIG believes that the General Insurance net loss reserves are
adequate to cover General Insurance net losses and loss expenses
as of June 30, 2008. While AIG regularly reviews the
adequacy of established loss reserves, there can be no assurance
that AIGs ultimate loss reserves will not develop
adversely and materially exceed AIGs loss reserves as of
June 30, 2008. In the opinion of management, such adverse
development and resulting increase in reserves is not likely to
have a material adverse effect on AIGs consolidated
financial condition, although it could have a material adverse
effect on AIGs consolidated results of operations for an
individual reporting period.
The reconciliation of net loss reserves was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Six Months | |
|
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
(in millions) |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
| |
Net reserve for losses and loss expenses at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
70,507 |
|
|
$ |
64,034 |
|
|
$ |
69,288 |
|
|
$ |
62,630 |
|
Foreign exchange effect
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
Losses and loss expenses incurred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year
|
|
|
8,620 |
|
|
|
7,334 |
|
|
|
16,641 |
|
|
|
14,549 |
|
Prior years, other than accretion of discount
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
(268 |
) |
Prior years, accretion of discount
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
Losses and loss expenses incurred
|
|
|
8,785 |
|
|
|
7,226 |
|
|
|
16,746 |
|
|
|
14,409 |
|
|
Losses and loss expenses paid
|
|
|
7,154 |
|
|
|
6,315 |
|
|
|
13,966 |
|
|
|
12,056 |
|
|
Net reserve for losses and loss expenses at end of period
|
|
$ |
72,331 |
|
|
$ |
65,197 |
|
|
$ |
72,331 |
|
|
$ |
65,197 |
|
|
The following tables summarize development, (favorable) or
unfavorable, of incurred losses and loss expenses for prior
years (other than accretion of discount):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Six Months | |
|
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
(in millions) |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
| |
Prior Accident Year Development by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reporting Unit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Insurance
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
$ |
(65 |
) |
|
$ |
(142 |
) |
|
$ |
(152 |
) |
|
Personal Lines
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
Mortgage Guaranty
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
Foreign General Insurance
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(254 |
) |
|
Transatlantic
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
Asbestos settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
Prior years, other than accretion of discount
|
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
$ |
(120 |
) |
|
$ |
(71 |
) |
|
$ |
(268 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Calendar Year | |
|
|
| |
(in millions) |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
| |
Prior Accident Year Development by Accident Year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$ |
(135 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(256 |
) |
|
$ |
(454 |
) |
|
2005
|
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
(165 |
) |
|
2004
|
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
2003
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
2002
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
2001 and prior
|
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
Prior years, other than accretion of discount
|
|
$ |
(71 |
) |
|
$ |
(268 |
) |
|
63
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
In determining the quarterly loss development from prior
accident years, AIG conducts analyses to determine the change in
estimated ultimate loss for each accident year for each profit
center. For example, if loss emergence for a profit center is
different than expected for certain accident years, the
actuaries examine the indicated effect such emergence would have
on the reserves of that profit center. In some cases, the higher
or lower than expected emergence may result in no clear change
in the ultimate loss estimate for the accident years in
question, and no adjustment would be made to the profit
centers reserves for prior accident years. In other cases,
the higher or lower than expected emergence may result in a
larger change, either favorable or unfavorable, than the
difference between the actual and expected loss emergence. Such
additional analyses were conducted for each profit center, as
appropriate, in the three-month period ended June 30, 2008
to determine the loss development from prior accident years for
the three-month period ended June 30, 2008. As part of its
quarterly reserving process, AIG also considers notices of
claims received with respect to emerging issues, such as those
related to the U.S. mortgage and housing market.
2008 Net Loss Development
In the three-month period ended June 30, 2008, net loss
development from prior accident years was adverse by
approximately $93 million, excluding approximately
$72 million from accretion of loss reserve discount. The
overall adverse development of $93 million consisted of
approximately $292 million of favorable development from
accident years 2004 through 2007 offset by approximately
$385 million of adverse loss development from accident
years 2003 and prior. The adverse development from accident
years 2003 and prior was primarily related to excess casualty
business within Commercial Insurance. The favorable development
from accident years 2004 through 2007 included approximately $80
million of favorable development from business written by
Lexington Insurance Company, including Healthcare and Casualty
and Program businesses. AIG Executive Liability business
contributed approximately $65 million to the favorable
development from accident years 2004 and 2005, relating
primarily to D&O. Within Commercial Insurance, the overall
adverse development of $75 million consisted of
approximately $160 million of adverse development relating
to excess casualty business and $50 million of adverse
development relating to property business, partially offset by
favorable development from D&O, healthcare and other
classes. A significant portion of the adverse development
relating to excess casualty was related to a variety of latent
exposures, including construction defect exposures, product
aggregate exposure and pharmaceutical related exposures, as well
as a significant number of other large losses primarily from
accident years 1998 through 2002. In addition, the loss
development assumptions applicable to excess casualty reserves
were modified in the second quarter of 2008 to reflect the
adverse experience being observed, and this caused approximately
$90 million of the overall adverse development from
accident years 2003 and prior. Excess casualty results for the
more recent accident years, i.e. 2004 and subsequent years, has
continued to be favorable. AIGs exposure to these latent
exposures was reduced after 2002 due to significant changes in
policy terms and conditions as well as underwriting guidelines.
In the six-month period ended June 30, 2008, net loss
development from prior accident years was favorable by
approximately $71 million, including approximately
$339 million of favorable development relating to loss
sensitive business in the first three months of 2008 (which was
offset by an equal amount of negative earned premium
development), and excluding approximately $176 million from
accretion of loss reserve discount. Excluding both the favorable
development relating to loss sensitive business and accretion of
loss reserve discount, net loss development from prior accident
years in the six-month period ended June 30, 2008, was
adverse by approximately $268 million. The overall favorable
development of $71 million consisted of approximately $841
million of favorable development from accident years 2004
through 2007 partially offset by approximately $770 million
of adverse loss development from accident years 2003 and prior.
Excluding the favorable development from loss sensitive
business, the overall adverse development of $268 million
consisted of approximately $561 million of favorable
development from accident years 2004 through 2007 offset by
approximately $829 million of adverse development from
accident years 2003 and prior. The adverse development from
accident years 2003 and prior was primarily related to excess
casualty business within Commercial Insurance. The favorable
development from accident years 2004 through 2007 included
approximately $280 million in favorable development from
loss sensitive business written by AIG Risk Management, and
approximately $220 million in favorable development from
business written by Lexington Insurance Company, including
Healthcare, AIG CAT Excess, Casualty and Program businesses. AIG
Executive Liability business contributed approximately $110
million to the favorable development from accident years 2004
and 2005, relating primarily to D&O. The adverse development
from accident years 2003 and prior included approximately
$200 million related to claims involving MTBE, a gasoline
additive, primarily on excess casualty business within
Commercial Insurance from accident years 2000 and prior. In
addition, as described above for the three months ended
June 30, 2008, the excess casualty adverse developments
reflect a variety of other latent claims and large losses, as
well as a $90 million increase resulting from the
modification of loss development factors to reflect adverse
experience in excess casualty.
64
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
2007 Net Loss Development
In the three-month period ended June 30, 2007, net loss
development from prior accident years was favorable by
approximately $120 million, including approximately
$18 million of adverse development from the general
reinsurance operations of Transatlantic; and excluding
approximately $12 million from accretion of loss reserve
discount. Excluding Transatlantic, as well as accretion of
discount, net loss development in the three-month period ended
June 30, 2007 from prior accident years was favorable by
approximately $138 million. The overall favorable
development of $120 million consisted of approximately
$475 million of favorable development from accident years
2003 through 2006, partially offset by approximately
$355 million of adverse development from accident years
2002 and prior. For the three-month period ended June 30,
2007, most classes of AIGs business continued to
experience favorable development for accident years 2003 through
2006. The majority of the adverse development from accident
years 2002 and prior was related to developments from excess
casualty business within Commercial Insurance and from
Transatlantic.
In the six-month period ended June 30, 2007, net loss
development from prior accident years was favorable by
approximately $268 million, including approximately
$36 million of adverse development from the general
reinsurance operations of Transatlantic; and excluding
approximately $128 million from accretion of loss reserve
discount. Excluding Transatlantic, as well as accretion of
discount, net loss development in the six-month period ended
June 30, 2007 from prior accident years was favorable by
approximately $304 million. The overall favorable
development of $268 million consisted of approximately
$740 million of favorable development from accident years
2003 through 2006, partially offset by approximately
$472 million of adverse development from accident years
2002 and prior. For the six-month period ended June 30,
2007, most classes of AIGs business continued to
experience favorable development for accident years 2003 through
2006. The majority of the adverse development from accident
years 2002 and prior was related to development from excess
casualty business within Commercial Insurance and from
Transatlantic.
Asbestos and Environmental Reserves
The estimation of loss reserves relating to asbestos and
environmental claims on insurance policies written many years
ago is subject to greater uncertainty than other types of claims
due to inconsistent court decisions as well as judicial
interpretations and legislative actions that in some cases have
tended to broaden coverage beyond the original intent of such
policies and in others have expanded theories of liability.
As
described more fully in the 2007 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
AIGs reserves relating to asbestos and environmental
claims reflect a comprehensive
ground-up analysis. In
the six-month period ended June 30, 2008, AIG maintained
the ultimate loss estimates for asbestos and environmental
claims resulting from the recently completed reserve analyses. A
minor amount of adverse incurred loss development pertaining to
asbestos was reflected in the six-month period ended
June 30, 2008, as presented in the table that follows. This
development was primarily attributable to several large
defendants, the effect of which was largely offset by one large
favorable settlement. A moderate amount of favorable gross
incurred loss development pertaining to environmental was
reflected in the six-month period ended June 30, 2008, as
presented in the table that follows. This development was
primarily attributable to recent favorable experience which was
fully reinsured, resulting in no favorable net development on
environmental net reserves.
65
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
A summary of reserve activity, including estimates for
applicable IBNR, relating to asbestos and environmental claims
separately and combined appears in the following table. The vast
majority of such claims arise from policies written in 1984 and
prior years. The current environmental policies that AIG
underwrites on a claims-made basis have been excluded from the
following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
(in millions) |
|
Gross | |
|
Net | |
|
Gross(a) | |
|
Net | |
|
Asbestos:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
3,864 |
|
|
$ |
1,454 |
|
|
$ |
4,523 |
|
|
$ |
1,889 |
|
|
Losses and loss expenses
incurred(b)
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
Losses and loss expenses
paid(b)
|
|
|
(383 |
) |
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
(454 |
) |
|
|
(268 |
) |
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses at end of period
|
|
$ |
3,541 |
|
|
$ |
1,288 |
|
|
$ |
4,079 |
|
|
$ |
1,596 |
|
|
Environmental:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
515 |
|
|
$ |
237 |
|
|
$ |
629 |
|
|
$ |
290 |
|
|
Losses and loss expenses
incurred(b)
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
Losses and loss expenses
paid(b)
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses at end of period
|
|
$ |
450 |
|
|
$ |
221 |
|
|
$ |
575 |
|
|
$ |
258 |
|
|
Combined:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
4,379 |
|
|
$ |
1,691 |
|
|
$ |
5,152 |
|
|
$ |
2,179 |
|
|
Losses and loss expenses
incurred(b)
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
Losses and loss expenses
paid(b)
|
|
|
(408 |
) |
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
(508 |
) |
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses at end of period
|
|
$ |
3,991 |
|
|
$ |
1,509 |
|
|
$ |
4,654 |
|
|
$ |
1,854 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Gross amounts were revised from the presentation in prior
periods to reflect the inclusion of certain reserves not
previously identified as asbestos and environmental related.
This revision had no effect on net reserves. |
(b) |
All amounts pertain to policies underwritten in prior years,
primarily to policies issued in 1984 and prior. |
The gross and net IBNR included in the reserve for losses
and loss expenses, relating to asbestos and environmental claims
separately and combined, were estimated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
(in millions) |
|
Gross | |
|
Net | |
|
Gross* | |
|
Net | |
|
Asbestos
|
|
$ |
2,256 |
|
|
$ |
997 |
|
|
$ |
3,068 |
|
|
$ |
1,279 |
|
Environmental
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
Combined
|
|
$ |
2,520 |
|
|
$ |
1,114 |
|
|
$ |
3,423 |
|
|
$ |
1,427 |
|
|
|
|
* |
Gross amounts were revised from the presentation in prior
periods to reflect the inclusion of certain reserves not
previously identified as asbestos and environmental related.
This revision had no effect on net reserves. |
A summary of asbestos and environmental claims count
activity was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Asbestos | |
|
Environmental | |
|
Combined | |
|
Asbestos | |
|
Environmental | |
|
Combined | |
|
Claims at beginning of year
|
|
|
6,563 |
|
|
|
7,652 |
|
|
|
14,215 |
|
|
|
6,878 |
|
|
|
9,442 |
|
|
|
16,320 |
|
Claims during year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opened
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
1,066 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
Settled
|
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
Dismissed or otherwise resolved
|
|
|
(551 |
) |
|
|
(1,172 |
) |
|
|
(1,723 |
) |
|
|
(544 |
) |
|
|
(899 |
) |
|
|
(1,443 |
) |
|
Claims at end of period
|
|
|
6,307 |
|
|
|
7,089 |
|
|
|
13,396 |
|
|
|
6,568 |
|
|
|
9,179 |
|
|
|
15,747 |
|
|
Survival Ratios Asbestos and
Environmental
The following table presents AIGs survival ratios for
asbestos and environmental claims at June 30, 2008 and
2007. The survival ratio is derived by dividing the current
carried loss reserve by the average payments for the three most
recent calendar years for these claims. Therefore, the survival
ratio is a simplistic measure estimating the number of years it
would be before the current ending loss reserves for these
claims would be paid off using recent year average payments. The
June 30, 2008 survival ratio is lower than the ratio at
June 30, 2007 because the more recent periods included in
the rolling average reflect higher claims payments. In addition,
AIGs survival ratio for asbestos claims was negatively
affected by the favorable settlement described above, as well as
several similar settlements during 2007. These settlements
reduced gross and net asbestos survival ratios at June 30,
2008 by approximately 1.4 years and 3.0 years,
respectively, and reduced gross and net asbestos survival ratios
at June 30, 2007 by approximately 1.7 years and
4.1 years, respectively. Many factors, such as aggressive
settlement procedures, mix of business and level of coverage
66
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
provided, have a significant effect on the amount of asbestos
and environmental reserves and payments and the resultant
survival ratio. Moreover, as discussed above, the primary basis
for AIGs determination of its reserves is not survival
ratios, but instead the
ground-up and top-down
analysis. Thus, caution should be exercised in attempting to
determine reserve adequacy for these claims based simply on this
survival ratio.
AIGs survival ratios for asbestos and environmental
claims, separately and combined were based upon a three-year
average payment. These ratios at June 30, 2008 and 2007
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross* |
|
Net |
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Survival ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asbestos
|
|
5.7 |
|
4.3 |
|
Environmental
|
|
4.5 |
|
3.7 |
|
Combined
|
|
5.5 |
|
4.2 |
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Survival ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asbestos
|
|
8.6 |
|
7.4 |
|
Environmental
|
|
5.2 |
|
4.0 |
|
Combined
|
|
8.0 |
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
* |
Gross amounts for 2007 were revised from the presentation in
prior periods to reflect the inclusion of certain reserves not
previously identified as asbestos and environmental related.
This revision had no effect on net reserves. |
Operating Review
Life Insurance & Retirement Services
Operations
AIGs Life Insurance & Retirement Services
operations offer a wide range of insurance and retirement
savings products both domestically and abroad.
AIGs Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement Services
operations include insurance and investment-oriented products
such as whole and term life, investment linked, universal life
and endowments, personal accident and health products; group
products including pension, life and health; and fixed and
variable annuities. The Foreign Life Insurance &
Retirement Services products are sold through independent
producers, career agents, financial institutions and direct
marketing channels.
AIGs Domestic Life Insurance operations offer a broad
range of protection products, such as individual life insurance
and group life and health products (including disability income
products and payout annuities), which include single premium
immediate annuities, structured settlements and terminal funding
annuities. The Domestic Life Insurance products are sold through
independent producers, career agents and financial institutions
and direct marketing channels. Home service operations include
an array of life insurance, accident and health and annuity
products sold primarily through career agents.
AIGs Domestic Retirement Services operations include group
retirement products, individual fixed and variable annuities
sold through banks, broker-dealers and exclusive sales
representatives, and annuity runoff operations, which include
previously acquired closed blocks and other fixed
and variable annuities largely sold through distribution
relationships that have been discontinued.
AIGs Life Insurance & Retirement Services reports
its operations through the following major internal reporting
units and legal entities:
Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement Services
Japan and Other
|
|
|
|
|
American Life Insurance Company (ALICO) |
|
|
|
AIG Star Life Insurance Co., Ltd. (AIG Star Life) |
|
|
|
AIG Edison Life Insurance Company (AIG Edison Life) |
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
American International Assurance Company, Limited, together with
American International Assurance Company (Bermuda) Limited (AIA) |
|
|
|
Nan Shan Life Insurance Company, Ltd. (Nan Shan) |
|
|
|
American International Reinsurance Company Limited (AIRCO) |
|
|
|
The Philippine American Life and General Insurance Company
(Philamlife) |
Domestic Life Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
American General Life Insurance Company (AIG American General) |
|
|
|
The United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York
(USLIFE) |
|
|
|
American General Life and Accident Insurance Company (AGLA) |
Domestic Retirement Services
|
|
|
|
|
The Variable Annuity Life Insurance Company (VALIC) |
|
|
|
AIG Annuity Insurance Company (AIG Annuity) |
|
|
|
AIG SunAmerica Life Assurance Company (AIG SunAmerica) |
67
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Life Insurance & Retirement Services
Results
Life Insurance & Retirement Services results were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Premiums | |
|
Net | |
|
Net Realized | |
|
|
|
Operating | |
|
|
and Other | |
|
Investment | |
|
Capital Gains | |
|
Total | |
|
Income | |
(in millions) |
|
Considerations | |
|
Income | |
|
(Losses) | |
|
Revenues | |
|
(Loss) | |
| |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement Services
|
|
$ |
7,691 |
|
|
$ |
3,162 |
|
|
$ |
(909 |
) |
|
$ |
9,944 |
|
|
$ |
773 |
|
|
Domestic Life Insurance
|
|
|
1,604 |
|
|
|
1,006 |
|
|
|
(1,376 |
) |
|
|
1,234 |
|
|
|
(1,005 |
) |
|
Domestic Retirement Services
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
(2,725 |
) |
|
|
(1,017 |
) |
|
|
(2,169 |
) |
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
9,585 |
|
|
$ |
5,586 |
|
|
$ |
(5,010 |
) |
|
$ |
10,161 |
|
|
$ |
(2,401 |
) |
|
Three months ended June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement Services
|
|
$ |
6,503 |
|
|
$ |
3,361 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
9,882 |
|
|
$ |
1,654 |
|
|
Domestic Life Insurance
|
|
|
1,369 |
|
|
|
1,006 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
2,359 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
Domestic Retirement Services
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
1,765 |
|
|
|
(281 |
) |
|
|
1,782 |
|
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
8,170 |
|
|
$ |
6,132 |
|
|
$ |
(279 |
) |
|
$ |
14,023 |
|
|
$ |
2,620 |
|
|
Percentage Increase/(Decrease) from Prior Year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement Services
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
(6 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
(53 |
)% |
|
Domestic Life Insurance
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic Retirement Services
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
(9 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
(28 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement Services
|
|
$ |
15,138 |
|
|
$ |
4,610 |
|
|
$ |
(1,631 |
) |
|
$ |
18,117 |
|
|
$ |
1,508 |
|
|
Domestic Life Insurance
|
|
|
3,191 |
|
|
|
1,990 |
|
|
|
(2,664 |
) |
|
|
2,517 |
|
|
|
(1,875 |
) |
|
Domestic Retirement Services
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
2,789 |
|
|
|
(5,084 |
) |
|
|
(1,721 |
) |
|
|
(3,865 |
) |
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
18,903 |
|
|
$ |
9,389 |
|
|
$ |
(9,379 |
) |
|
$ |
18,913 |
|
|
$ |
(4,232 |
) |
|
Six months ended June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement Services
|
|
$ |
13,116 |
|
|
$ |
6,244 |
|
|
$ |
(217 |
) |
|
$ |
19,143 |
|
|
$ |
2,938 |
|
|
Domestic Life Insurance
|
|
|
2,897 |
|
|
|
2,011 |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
4,880 |
|
|
|
713 |
|
|
Domestic Retirement Services
|
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
3,390 |
|
|
|
(290 |
) |
|
|
3,682 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
16,595 |
|
|
$ |
11,645 |
|
|
$ |
(535 |
) |
|
$ |
27,705 |
|
|
$ |
4,901 |
|
|
Percentage Increase/(Decrease) from Prior Year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement Services
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
(26 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
|
(49 |
)% |
|
Domestic Life Insurance
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic Retirement Services
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
(19 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
(32 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
|
The gross insurance in force for Life Insurance &
Retirement Services was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
(in millions) |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
| |
Foreign*
|
|
$ |
1,438,309 |
|
|
$ |
1,327,251 |
|
Domestic
|
|
|
1,014,785 |
|
|
|
984,794 |
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
2,453,094 |
|
|
$ |
2,312,045 |
|
|
|
|
* |
Includes an increase of $45.2 billion related to changes
in foreign exchange rates at June 30, 2008. |
Disruption in the U.S. residential mortgage and credit
markets was the key driver of operating results in the three-
and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to
significant net realized capital losses resulting from
other-than-temporary impairment charges of $5.2 billion and
$9.6 billion in the three- and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2008, respectively, compared to $324 million
and $716 million in the same periods of 2007. In addition,
net investment income and certain products continued to be
affected by the volatile markets.
Life Insurance & Retirement Services total revenues in
the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008
reflect growth in premiums and other considerations compared to
the same periods in 2007, primarily due to strong production in
the Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement Services
operations and sales of payout annuities in Domestic Life
Insurance. Overall growth in premiums and other considerations
was dampened by a continuing shift to investment-oriented
products and the suspension in the second quarter of 2007 of new
sales on certain products in Japan pending completion of an
industry wide review by the tax authorities. This review was
finalized in March 2008 and resulted in lower tax deductibility
of these products for the policyholder. Although sales of these
products have restarted in Japan, it is expected that sales will
be at lower than historical levels.
Net investment income decreased in the three- and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in
2007 due to significantly lower partnership, yield enhancement
and mutual fund income, trading account losses of
$133 million and $221 million, respectively, in the
U.K. associated with certain investment-linked products and
increased levels of short-term investments. Policyholder
investment income and trading gains and losses (together,
policyholder trading gains (losses)) were $617 million and
$(168) million in the three- and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2008, respectively, compared to gains of
$1.1 billion and $1.9 billion in the same periods in
2007, reflecting equity
68
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
market declines. Policyholder trading gains (losses) are offset
by a charge to incurred policy losses and benefits expense.
Policyholder trading gains (losses) generally reflect the trends
in equity markets, principally in Japan and Asia.
The higher net realized capital losses in the three- and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same
periods in 2007 were primarily related to severity impairments
due to the credit market disruption and foreign exchange losses
as a result of the weakening of the dollar against foreign
currencies.
In addition to the higher net realized capital losses and lower
net investment income noted above, the operating loss for the
three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 was
unfavorably affected by an increased negative investment spread
in Taiwan and changes in actuarial estimates totaling
$31 million in connection with Domestic Retirement
Services variable annuity products. These decreases were
partially offset by the favorable effect of foreign exchange
rates. Operating loss in the three-month period ended
June 30, 2008 included a DAC and SIA benefit of
$212 million related to net realized capital losses
compared to a benefit of $103 million in the same period in
2007. Operating loss in the six-month period ended June 30,
2008 included a DAC and SIA benefit of $479 million related
to net realized capital losses compared to $114 million in
the same period in 2007.
In 2007, operating income included charges of $25 million
and $62 million for the three- and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2007, respectively, related to a regulatory claims
review in Japan.
AIG adopted FAS 157 on January 1, 2008 and the most
significant effect on the Life Insurance & Retirement
Services results was the change in measurement of fair value for
embedded policy derivatives. The pre tax effect of
adoption related to embedded policy derivatives was an increase
in net realized capital losses of $155 million as of
January 1, 2008, partially offset by a $47 million DAC
benefit related to these losses. The effect of initial adoption
was primarily due to an increase in the embedded policy
derivative liability valuations resulting from the inclusion of
explicit risk margins.
AIG adopted FAS 159 on January 1, 2008 and elected to
apply the fair value option to a closed block of single premium
variable life business in Japan and for an
investment linked product sold principally in Asia.
The adoption of FAS 159 with respect to these fair value
elections resulted in a decrease to 2008 opening retained
earnings of $559 million, net of tax. The fair value of the
liabilities for these policies totaled $3.6 billion at
June 30, 2008 and is reported in policyholders
contract deposits.
69
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement Services
Results
Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement Services results
on a subproduct basis were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Premiums | |
|
Net | |
|
Net Realized | |
|
|
|
Operating | |
|
|
and Other | |
|
Investment | |
|
Capital Gains | |
|
Total | |
|
Income | |
(in millions) |
|
Considerations | |
|
Income | |
|
(Losses) | |
|
Revenues | |
|
(Loss) | |
| |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
$ |
4,634 |
|
|
$ |
1,813 |
|
|
$ |
(750 |
) |
|
$ |
5,697 |
|
|
$ |
252 |
|
|
Personal accident
|
|
|
1,855 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
1,938 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
Group products
|
|
|
1,002 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
1,235 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
7,691 |
|
|
$ |
3,162 |
|
|
$ |
(909 |
) |
|
$ |
9,944 |
|
|
$ |
773 |
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
$ |
4,105 |
|
|
$ |
2,092 |
|
|
$ |
141 |
|
|
$ |
6,338 |
|
|
$ |
1,155 |
|
|
Personal accident
|
|
|
1,487 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
Group products
|
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
906 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
6,503 |
|
|
$ |
3,361 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
9,882 |
|
|
$ |
1,654 |
|
|
Percentage Increase/(Decrease) from Prior Year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
(13 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
(10 |
)% |
|
|
(78 |
)% |
|
Personal accident
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
Group products
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
(6 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
(53 |
)% |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
$ |
9,146 |
|
|
$ |
2,732 |
|
|
$ |
(1,317 |
) |
|
$ |
10,561 |
|
|
$ |
483 |
|
|
Personal accident
|
|
|
3,546 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
3,681 |
|
|
|
763 |
|
|
Group products
|
|
|
1,998 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
2,354 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
1,229 |
|
|
|
(228 |
) |
|
|
1,209 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
15,138 |
|
|
$ |
4,610 |
|
|
$ |
(1,631 |
) |
|
$ |
18,117 |
|
|
$ |
1,508 |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
$ |
8,272 |
|
|
$ |
3,649 |
|
|
$ |
(27 |
) |
|
$ |
11,894 |
|
|
$ |
1,807 |
|
|
Personal accident
|
|
|
2,960 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
3,124 |
|
|
|
693 |
|
|
Group products
|
|
|
1,443 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
1,812 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
1,148 |
|
|
|
(157 |
) |
|
|
1,237 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
13,116 |
|
|
$ |
6,244 |
|
|
$ |
(217 |
) |
|
$ |
19,143 |
|
|
$ |
2,938 |
|
|
Percentage Increase/(Decrease) from Prior Year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
(25 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
(11 |
)% |
|
|
(73 |
)% |
|
Personal accident
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
Group products
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
(26 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
|
(49 |
)% |
|
AIG transacts business in most major foreign currencies and
therefore premiums and other considerations reported in
U.S. dollars vary by volume and from changes in foreign
currency translation rates.
The following table summarizes the effect of changes in
foreign currency exchange rates on the growth of the Foreign
Life Insurance & Retirement Services premiums and other
considerations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Six Months | |
|
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
Ended June 30, | |
| |
| |
|
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
| |
Growth in original currency*
|
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
Foreign exchange effect
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
Growth as reported in U.S. dollars
|
|
|
18.3 |
% |
|
|
8.7 |
% |
|
|
15.4 |
% |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
|
* |
Computed using a constant exchange rate each period. |
70
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Quarterly Japan and Other Results
First year premium, single premium and annuity deposits for
Japan and Other were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Percentage | |
|
|
|
|
Increase/ | |
|
|
Three Months | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Original | |
(in millions) |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
U.S.$ | |
|
Currency | |
| |
First year premium
|
|
$ |
734 |
|
|
$ |
673 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
(4 |
)% |
Single premium
|
|
|
2,178 |
|
|
|
2,121 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
Annuity deposits
|
|
|
6,018 |
|
|
|
4,141 |
|
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
43 |
% |
|
First year premium sales in the three-month period ended
June 30, 2008 grew moderately in U.S. dollar terms,
but declined on an original currency basis compared to the same
period in 2007. First year premium life insurance sales in Japan
declined reflecting the continued effect of the suspension of
the increasing term products in April 2007 which more than
offset strong growth of the more profitable U.S. dollar
products in Japan. Personal accident first year premium sales
were flat compared to the same period in 2007. Group products
sales increased primarily due to pension sales in Brazil and
credit life business in the Middle East.
Single premium interest sensitive life insurance sales remained
strong in Japan in the three-month period ended June 30,
2008, while guaranteed income bond sales in the U.K. decreased
in that period due to sales efforts being focused on the launch
of a new variable annuity product. In Japan, a new single
premium personal accident and health product was successfully
launched during the first quarter of 2008 with the majority of
sales coming through banks which were recently deregulated and
are now able to sell accident and health products. Group
products single premium sales increased substantially with
higher production in Brazil, the U.K. and Poland due to the
launch of new products and the addition of large group accounts.
Annuity deposits increased in the three-month period ended
June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 as both
fixed and variable products performed well. In Japan, fixed
annuity deposits increased significantly due to an improved
exchange rate environment and volatile equity markets. Net flows
for Japan fixed annuities increased from $165 million in
the three-month period ended June 30, 2007 to
$1.2 billion in the three-month period ended June 30,
2008. In the U.K., variable annuity deposits continued to
reflect strong growth due to the launch of a new product.
Japan and Other results on a subproduct basis were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Premiums | |
|
Net | |
|
Net Realized | |
|
|
|
Operating | |
|
|
and Other | |
|
Investment | |
|
Capital Gains | |
|
Total | |
|
Income | |
(in millions) |
|
Considerations | |
|
Income | |
|
(Losses) | |
|
Revenues | |
|
(Loss) | |
| |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
$ |
1,568 |
|
|
$ |
643 |
|
|
$ |
(298 |
) |
|
$ |
1,913 |
|
|
$ |
144 |
|
|
Personal accident
|
|
|
1,336 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
1,398 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
Group products
|
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
3,896 |
|
|
$ |
1,902 |
|
|
$ |
(429 |
) |
|
$ |
5,369 |
|
|
$ |
577 |
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
$ |
1,350 |
|
|
$ |
641 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
2,024 |
|
|
$ |
438 |
|
|
Personal accident
|
|
|
1,041 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,093 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
Group products
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
3,133 |
|
|
$ |
1,825 |
|
|
$ |
(95 |
) |
|
$ |
4,863 |
|
|
$ |
810 |
|
|
Percentage Increase/(Decrease) from Prior Year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
|
(67 |
)% |
|
Personal accident
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
Group products
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
(29 |
)% |
|
Total revenues for Japan and Other in the three-month period
ended June 30, 2008 increased compared to the same period
in 2007 primarily due to growth in premiums and other
considerations, partially offset by higher net realized capital
losses. Realized capital losses increased primarily due to
higher other-than-temporary impairments of ABS and Japan real
estate investment trusts. Net investment income grew modestly in
the period as higher interest and dividends more than offset
lower partnership and mutual fund income of $13 million and
higher mark to market trading losses of $119 million
related to certain investment-linked products in the U.K.
compared to the same period in 2007.
Operating income declined in the three-month period ended
June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 due to
significantly increased realized capital losses and the higher
trading losses, partially offset by $25 million of lower
benefit costs in Japan related to the regulatory claims review
which negatively affected prior year results, lower benefit
costs of $37 million, net of hedge gains and losses,
resulting from an increase in the Japanese equity market and
interest rates which
71
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
had the effect of reducing policy liabilities carried at fair
value under FAS 159 and the positive effect of foreign
exchange. During the latter part of the second quarter of 2008,
management implemented a previously announced hedging program
that is expected to reduce future volatility of the policy
liabilities carried at fair value under FAS 159.
Year-to-Date
Japan and Other Results
First year premium, single premium and annuity deposits for
Japan and Other were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Percentage | |
|
|
|
|
Increase/ | |
|
|
Six Months | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Original | |
(in millions) |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
U.S.$ | |
|
Currency | |
| |
First year premium
|
|
$ |
1,376 |
|
|
$ |
1,293 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
(4 |
)% |
Single premium
|
|
|
5,134 |
|
|
|
4,118 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
Annuity deposits
|
|
|
11,525 |
|
|
|
8,212 |
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
First year premium sales in the six-month period ended
June 30, 2008 grew modestly in U.S. dollar terms, but
declined on an original currency basis compared to the same
period in 2007. The lower first year premium sales primarily
reflect the effect of suspending sales of increasing term
products in Japan during the second quarter of last year. Due to
the large premium size for the increasing term products, the
sales suspension masks the positive underlying growth of more
profitable U.S. dollar products in Japan and other life
insurance products in Europe and the Middle East. Personal
accident first year premium sales were flat compared to the same
period in 2007.
Single premium interest sensitive life insurance sales remained
strong in Japan and guaranteed income bond sales in the U.K.
were higher than the same period last year, although sales are
shifting to a new variable annuity product and that trend is
expected to continue for the remainder of the year. A new single
premium personal accident and health product launched in Japan
during the first quarter of 2008 continues to perform well and
sales which started through banks are being expanded to the
agency channels.
Annuity deposits increased in the six-month period ended
June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 as both
fixed and variable products performed well. In Japan, fixed
annuity products improved due to the launch of new products and
a favorable exchange rate environment for non-yen denominated
products. Net flows for Japan individual fixed annuities
increased from $56 million in the six-month period ended
June 30, 2007 to $1.8 billion in the six-month period
ended June 30, 2008. Variable annuity deposit growth in the
U.K. was favorably affected by the launch of a new product.
Japan and Other results on a sub-product basis were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Premiums and | |
|
Net | |
|
Net Realized | |
|
|
|
Operating | |
|
|
Other | |
|
Investment | |
|
Capital Gains | |
|
Total | |
|
Income | |
(in millions) |
|
Considerations | |
|
Income | |
|
(Losses) | |
|
Revenues | |
|
(Loss) | |
| |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
$ |
2,896 |
|
|
$ |
980 |
|
|
$ |
(545 |
) |
|
$ |
3,331 |
|
|
$ |
201 |
|
|
Personal accident
|
|
|
2,513 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
2,599 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
Group products
|
|
|
1,552 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
1,875 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
1,162 |
|
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
7,385 |
|
|
$ |
2,652 |
|
|
$ |
(772 |
) |
|
$ |
9,265 |
|
|
$ |
1,060 |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
$ |
2,566 |
|
|
$ |
1,191 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
3,772 |
|
|
$ |
790 |
|
|
Personal accident
|
|
|
2,069 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2,173 |
|
|
|
532 |
|
|
Group products
|
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1,471 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
1,092 |
|
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
1,145 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,072 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
6,159 |
|
|
$ |
3,615 |
|
|
$ |
(141 |
) |
|
$ |
9,633 |
|
|
$ |
1,723 |
|
|
Percentage Increase/(Decrease) from Prior Year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
(18 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
(12 |
)% |
|
|
(75 |
)% |
|
Personal accident
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
Group products
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(94 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
(27 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
(38 |
)% |
|
Total revenues for Japan and Other in the six-month period ended
June 30, 2008 decreased compared to the same period in 2007
primarily due to higher net realized capital losses and lower
net investment income. Net investment income declined due to
lower policyholder trading gains, partnership and mutual fund
income as well as mark to market trading losses related to
investment-linked products in the U.K. Policyholder trading
gains declined to $176 million for the six-month period
ended June 30, 2008 from $1.4 billion for the same
period in 2007. Policyholder trading gains (losses) are offset
by a charge to incurred policy losses and benefits expense.
Partnership and mutual fund income for the six-month period
ended June 30, 2008 was $59 million lower than the
same period in 2007. Trading account losses in the U.K. on
certain investment-linked products were $221 million for
the six-month period ended June 30, 2008
72
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
compared to a loss of $14 million in the same period in
2007. Net realized capital losses grew significantly in the
period primarily due to other-than-temporary impairments.
Despite the continued strong growth in the underlying business
and the positive effect of foreign exchange, the decline in
total revenues resulted in lower operating income for the
six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same
period in 2007. Operating income for the six-month period ended
June 30, 2008 was favorably affected by lower benefit costs
of $62 million related to the regulatory claims review in
Japan, which negatively affected last years results.
Operating income was negatively affected by higher benefit costs
of $43 million, net of hedge gains and losses, resulting
from volatility in the Japanese equity market and interest rates
which impact variable life fair value liabilities under FAS 159
and lower DAC benefit related to realized capital losses of
$57 million compared to a benefit of $41 million in
the same period in 2007.
Quarterly Asia Results
First year premium, single premium and annuity deposits for
Asia were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Percentage | |
|
|
|
|
Increase/ | |
|
|
Three Months | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Original | |
(in millions) |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
U.S.$ | |
|
Currency | |
| |
First year premium
|
|
$ |
762 |
|
|
$ |
740 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
Single premium
|
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
922 |
|
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
|
(9 |
)% |
Annuity deposits
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
34 |
% |
|
First year premium sales in the three-month period ended
June 30, 2008 grew modestly on a U.S. dollar basis but
were flat on an original currency basis compared to the same
period in 2007 as the sales focus shifted more to single premium
products. In Hong Kong and Singapore, life insurance first year
premium sales increased due to promotional campaigns and
increased bancassurance sales. However, Taiwan first year life
insurance sales declined as the focus has shifted to a newly
launched variable annuity product. First year personal accident
premiums declined due to increased competition in the direct
marketing channel in Korea, which offset positive growth in
other parts of Asia. The group products business performed well,
particularly in Australia.
Single premium sales in the three-month period ended
June 30, 2008 decreased as sales in Taiwan shifted to the
new variable annuity product. This decrease was partially offset
by strong investment-oriented life insurance sales, particularly
in Singapore and Korea and single premium credit life sales in
Thailand and Taiwan.
Annuity deposits in the three-month period ended June 30,
2008 rose significantly compared to the same period in 2007 due
to the launch of the new variable annuity product in Taiwan.
Asia results, presented on a sub-product basis were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Premiums | |
|
Net | |
|
Net Realized | |
|
|
|
|
and Other | |
|
Investment | |
|
Capital Gains | |
|
Total | |
|
Operating | |
(in millions) |
|
Considerations | |
|
Income | |
|
(Losses) | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Income | |
| |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
$ |
3,066 |
|
|
$ |
1,170 |
|
|
$ |
(452 |
) |
|
$ |
3,784 |
|
|
$ |
108 |
|
|
Personal accident
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Group products
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
3,795 |
|
|
$ |
1,260 |
|
|
$ |
(480 |
) |
|
$ |
4,575 |
|
|
$ |
196 |
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
$ |
2,755 |
|
|
$ |
1,451 |
|
|
$ |
108 |
|
|
$ |
4,314 |
|
|
$ |
717 |
|
|
Personal accident
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
Group products
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
3,370 |
|
|
$ |
1,536 |
|
|
$ |
113 |
|
|
$ |
5,019 |
|
|
$ |
844 |
|
|
Percentage Increase/(Decrease) from Prior Year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
(19 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
(12 |
)% |
|
|
(85 |
)% |
|
Personal accident
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
Group products
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
(18 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
(9 |
)% |
|
|
(77 |
)% |
|
Total revenues for Asia in the three-month period ended
June 30, 2008 decreased compared to the same period in
2007, primarily due to the negative effect of policyholder
trading gains (losses) on net investment income and higher net
realized capital losses, which more than offset the growth in
premiums and other considerations. Premiums and other
considerations increased in the three-month period ended
June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007, despite
a continued
73
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
trend toward investment-oriented products where only a portion
of policy charges are reported as premiums. Personal accident
premiums grew despite flat first year premium growth due to a
successful retention initiative. Group products premiums grew,
reflecting increased first year premiums. Net investment income
declined due to policyholder trading losses of $7 million
in 2008 compared to gains of $415 million in the same
period in 2007 and a reduction in partnership and mutual fund
income, which was $44 million lower than the same period in
2007. Net realized capital losses in the three-month period
ended June 30, 2008 included higher other-than-temporary
impairment charges and higher losses on the fair value of
derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment
under FAS 133 compared to the same period in 2007.
Operating income in the three-month period ended June 30,
2008 decreased compared to the same period in 2007 principally
due to higher net realized capital losses and lower net
investment income relative to growth in the business. Operating
income was also affected by the favorable effect of foreign
exchange rates and the unfavorable effect of the increased
negative investment spread in Taiwan resulting from lower
investment returns.
Year-to-Date Asia
Results
First year premium, single premium and annuity deposits for
Asia were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Six Months | |
|
Percentage | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Increase/ | |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original | |
(in millions) |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
U.S.$ | |
|
Currency | |
| |
First year premium
|
|
$ |
1,480 |
|
|
$ |
1,414 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
Single premium
|
|
|
1,850 |
|
|
|
1,570 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
Annuity deposits
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
80 |
% |
|
|
76 |
% |
|
First year premium sales in the six-month period ended
June 30, 2008 grew moderately compared to the same period
in 2007 as the sales focus shifted more to single premium and
annuity products. In Taiwan, life insurance first year premium
sales declined as sales shifted to a newly launched variable
annuity product. The group products business performed well in
Australia, Singapore and Hong Kong.
Single premium sales in the six-month period ended June 30,
2008 grew significantly compared to the same period in 2007
primarily due to investment-oriented life insurance sales,
particularly in Singapore, Hong Kong, and Korea, as well as
strong credit life sales in Thailand.
Annuity deposits in the six-month period ended June 30,
2008 more than doubled the level reported for the same period in
2007 due to the launch of the new variable annuity product in
Taiwan. Deposits in Korea were down in the six-month period
ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period last year
due to a recent market shift toward variable products.
Asia results, presented on a sub-product basis were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Premiums and | |
|
Net | |
|
Net Realized | |
|
|
|
Operating | |
|
|
Other | |
|
Investment | |
|
Capital Gains | |
|
Total | |
|
Income | |
(in millions) |
|
Considerations | |
|
Income | |
|
(Losses) | |
|
Revenues | |
|
(Loss) | |
| |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
$ |
6,250 |
|
|
$ |
1,752 |
|
|
$ |
(772 |
) |
|
$ |
7,230 |
|
|
$ |
282 |
|
|
Personal accident
|
|
|
1,033 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
1,082 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
Group products
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
7,753 |
|
|
$ |
1,958 |
|
|
$ |
(859 |
) |
|
$ |
8,852 |
|
|
$ |
448 |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
$ |
5,706 |
|
|
$ |
2,458 |
|
|
$ |
(42 |
) |
|
$ |
8,122 |
|
|
$ |
1,017 |
|
|
Personal accident
|
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
951 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
Group products
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
6,957 |
|
|
$ |
2,629 |
|
|
$ |
(76 |
) |
|
$ |
9,510 |
|
|
$ |
1,215 |
|
|
Percentage Increase/(Decrease) from Prior Year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
(29 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
(11 |
)% |
|
|
(72 |
)% |
|
Personal accident
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
Group products
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
(26 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
(7 |
)% |
|
|
(63 |
)% |
|
Total revenues in Asia in the six-month period ended
June 30, 2008 decreased compared to the same period in 2007
primarily due to lower net investment income and higher net
realized capital losses, which more than offset the growth in
premiums and other considerations. Net investment income
declined due to policyholder trading losses of $332 million
in 2008 compared to gains of $494 million in 2007 and lower
partnership and mutual fund income. Partnership and mutual fund
income for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 was
$184 million lower than the same period in 2007. The higher
realized capital losses were primarily due to
other-than-temporary impairment of dollar denominated securities
74
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
held in Singapore and Taiwan which declined in value due to a
weakening U.S. dollar.
Operating income for the six-month period ended June 30,
2008 declined compared to the same period in 2007 primarily as a
result of lower revenues. Results for the year were also
affected by lower operating income in Taiwan due to the
increased negative investment spread resulting from lower
investment returns.
Quarterly Domestic Life Insurance Results
Domestic Life Insurance results, presented on a sub-product
basis were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Premiums | |
|
Net | |
|
Net Realized | |
|
|
|
Operating | |
|
|
and Other | |
|
Investment | |
|
Capital Gains | |
|
Total | |
|
Income | |
(in millions) |
|
Considerations | |
|
Income | |
|
(Losses) | |
|
Revenues | |
|
(Loss) | |
| |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
$ |
621 |
|
|
$ |
365 |
|
|
$ |
(1,110 |
) |
|
$ |
(124 |
) |
|
$ |
(918 |
) |
|
Home service
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
Group life/health
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Payout annuities*
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
851 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
Individual fixed and runoff annuities
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,604 |
|
|
$ |
1,006 |
|
|
$ |
(1,376 |
) |
|
$ |
1,234 |
|
|
$ |
(1,005 |
) |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
$ |
603 |
|
|
$ |
402 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
1,048 |
|
|
$ |
262 |
|
|
Home service
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
Group life/health
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Payout annuities*
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
605 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
Individual fixed and runoff annuities
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,369 |
|
|
$ |
1,006 |
|
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
2,359 |
|
|
$ |
368 |
|
|
Percentage Increase/(Decrease) from Prior Year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
(9 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
Home service
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Group life/health
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payout annuities
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual fixed and runoff annuities
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
(48 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
* |
Includes structured settlements, single premium immediate
annuities and terminal funding annuities. |
Total Domestic Life Insurance revenues decreased in the
three-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same
period in 2007 due to significantly higher net realized capital
losses, partially offset by higher premiums and other
considerations. The increase in net realized capital losses was
primarily driven by other-than-temporary impairments of ABS
related to AIGs securities lending program. See Invested
Assets Securities Lending Activities for further
information. Domestic Life Insurance premiums and other
considerations increased in the three-month period ended
June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 primarily
due to strong payout annuity deposits and growth in life
insurance business in force. The growth in payout annuity
deposits was driven by structured settlements and terminal
funding annuities in both the U.S. and Canada. Net investment
income for the three-month period ended June 30, 2008 was
consistent with the same period in 2007 despite growth in the
underlying business. Net investment income for the three-month
period ended June 30, 2008 was affected by lower
partnership and other yield enhancement income of
$66 million and reduced overall investment yield from
increased levels of short-term investments. Offsetting these
items was higher net investment income due to the phase out of
losses related to synthetic fuel production investments
(Synfuel) of $38 million.
Operating income for the three-month period ended June 30,
2008 compared to the same period in 2007 decreased due
principally to higher net realized capital losses as described
above, partially offset by the growth in the in force block
of life insurance and payout annuities and favorable mortality
experience in the life insurance business during the quarter.
Home service operating income decreased due to higher net
realized capital losses partially offset by improved margins on
the in-force business. Group life/health operating income
increased due to favorable development on the financial
institutions credit life run-off block, improved underwriting
results on certain product lines and lower DAC amortization
costs compared to the same period in 2007. In addition, 2007
operating income was positively affected by a $15 million
litigation accrual release. Operating income during the
three-month period ended June 30, 2008 includes a DAC
benefit related to realized capital losses of $17 million
compared to a benefit of $4 million in the same period in
2007.
75
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Year-to-Date
Domestic Life Insurance Results
Domestic Life Insurance results, presented on a sub-product
basis were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Premiums and | |
|
Net | |
|
Net Realized | |
|
|
|
Operating | |
|
|
Other | |
|
Investment | |
|
Capital Gains | |
|
Total | |
|
Income | |
(in millions) |
|
Considerations | |
|
Income | |
|
(Losses) | |
|
Revenues | |
|
(Loss) | |
| |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
$ |
1,210 |
|
|
$ |
738 |
|
|
$ |
(2,165 |
) |
|
$ |
(217 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,757 |
) |
|
Home service
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
(338 |
) |
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
Group life/health
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Payout annuities*
|
|
|
1,158 |
|
|
|
623 |
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
1,726 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
Individual fixed and runoff annuities
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
3,191 |
|
|
$ |
1,990 |
|
|
$ |
(2,664 |
) |
|
$ |
2,517 |
|
|
$ |
(1,875 |
) |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
$ |
1,181 |
|
|
$ |
774 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
1,995 |
|
|
$ |
449 |
|
|
Home service
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
693 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
Group life/health
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Payout annuities*
|
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
Individual fixed and runoff annuities
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
2,897 |
|
|
$ |
2,011 |
|
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
|
$ |
4,880 |
|
|
$ |
713 |
|
|
Percentage Increase/(Decrease) from Prior Year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
Home service
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Group life/health
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
50 |
|
|
Payout annuities
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
Individual fixed and runoff annuities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
(48 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
* |
Includes structured settlements, single premium immediate
annuities and terminal funding annuities. |
Total Domestic Life Insurance revenues decreased in the
six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same
period in 2007 due to higher net realized capital losses and
lower net investment income partially offset by higher premiums
and other considerations. The increase in net realized capital
losses was primarily driven by other-than-temporary impairments
of ABS related to AIGs securities lending program. See
Invested Assets Investments in RMBS, CMBS, CDOs and
ABS Investments in ABS and Securities
Lending Activities for further information. Domestic Life
Insurance premiums and other considerations increased in the
six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same
period in 2007 primarily due to strong payout annuity deposits
and growth in life insurance business in force. The growth in
payout annuity deposits was driven by sales of structured
settlements and terminal funding annuities in both the
U.S. and Canada. Net investment income declined in the
six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same
period in 2007 despite growth in the underlying business. Net
investment income for the
six-month period ended
June 30, 2008 was affected by lower partnership and other
yield enhancement income of $102 million and reduced
overall investment yield from increased levels of
short-term investments.
Offsetting these items was higher net investment income due to
the phase out of losses related to Synfuel investments of
$67 million.
Operating income for the six-month period ended June 30,
2008 compared to the same period in 2007 decreased due
principally to higher net realized capital losses and the lower
net investment income as described above. Partially offsetting
these items was the growth in the in force block of life
insurance and payout annuities and favorable mortality
experience in the life insurance and payout annuities
businesses. Home service operating income decreased due to
higher net realized capital losses partially offset by improved
margins on the in-force business. Group life/health operating
income increased due to favorable development on the financial
institutions credit life run-off block, improved underwriting
results on certain product lines and lower DAC amortization
costs compared to the same period in 2007. In addition, 2007
operating income was positively affected by a $16 million
litigation accrual release. Operating income during the
six-month period ended June 30, 2008 includes a DAC benefit
related to realized capital losses of $37 million compared
to a benefit of $4 million in the same period in 2007.
76
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Domestic Life Insurance sales and deposits by
product* were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
Six Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
|
|
June 30, | |
|
Percentage | |
|
June 30, | |
|
Percentage | |
|
|
| |
|
Increase/ | |
|
| |
|
Increase/ | |
(in millions) |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
| |
Life insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Periodic premium by product:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Universal life
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
$ |
93 |
|
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
Variable universal life
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
Term life
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Whole life/other
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
Total periodic premiums by product
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Unscheduled and single deposits
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
Total life insurance
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
Home service
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance and accident and health
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
(10 |
)% |
|
Fixed annuities
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
Unscheduled and single deposits
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
Total home service
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
Group life/health
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
Payout annuities
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
1,550 |
|
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
Individual fixed and runoff annuities
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
81 |
% |
|
Total sales and deposits
|
|
$ |
1,345 |
|
|
$ |
1,012 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
$ |
2,512 |
|
|
$ |
2,056 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
|
* |
Life insurance sales include periodic premium from new
business expected to be collected over a one-year period and
unscheduled and single premiums from new and existing
policyholders. Sales of group accident and health insurance
represent annualized first year premium from new policies.
Annuity sales represent deposits from new and existing
policyholders. |
Domestic Life Insurance periodic premium sales increased 5
percent and 6 percent in the
three- and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2008, respectively, compared to the
same period in 2007 primarily as a result of strong private
placement variable universal life sales. The U.S. life
insurance market remains highly competitive and Domestic
Lifes emphasis on maintaining new business margins has
negatively affected sales of term and universal life products,
although recent enhancements to term products have resulted in
an increase in term sales. Group life/health growth was driven
by increased sales of supplemental health and voluntary
products. Payout annuities have experienced strong growth from
terminal funding and structured settlement sales in both the
U.S. and Canada. Home service growth was primarily from
increased fixed annuity deposits. Individual fixed and runoff
annuities sales and deposits have increased as a result of the
current interest rate environment as credited rates offered
during the quarter were more competitive with the rates offered
by banks on certificates of deposit.
Quarterly Domestic Retirement Services Results
Domestic Retirement Services results, presented on a
sub-product basis were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Premiums and | |
|
Net | |
|
Net Realized | |
|
|
|
Operating | |
|
|
Other | |
|
Investment | |
|
Capital Gains | |
|
Total | |
|
Income | |
(in millions) |
|
Considerations | |
|
Income | |
|
(Losses) | |
|
Revenues | |
|
(Loss) | |
| |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group retirement products
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
488 |
|
|
$ |
(940 |
) |
|
$ |
(341 |
) |
|
$ |
(699 |
) |
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
(1,591 |
) |
|
|
(757 |
) |
|
|
(1,274 |
) |
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
Individual annuities runoff*
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
(151 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
290 |
|
|
$ |
1,418 |
|
|
$ |
(2,725 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,017 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,169 |
) |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group retirement products
|
|
$ |
112 |
|
|
$ |
641 |
|
|
$ |
(103 |
) |
|
$ |
650 |
|
|
$ |
265 |
|
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
849 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
Individual annuities runoff*
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
298 |
|
|
$ |
1,765 |
|
|
$ |
(281 |
) |
|
$ |
1,782 |
|
|
$ |
598 |
|
|
Percentage Increase/(Decrease) from Prior Year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group retirement products
|
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
(24 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Individual annuities runoff
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
|
(20 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
* |
Primarily represents runoff annuity business sold through
discontinued distribution relationships. |
Total revenues and operating income for Domestic Retirement
Services declined in the three-month period ended June 30,
2008 compared to the same period in 2007, primarily due to
significantly increased net realized capital
77
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
losses, lower partnership income of $170 million and lower
yield enhancement income of $78 million. Net realized
capital losses for Domestic Retirement Services increased
primarily due to higher other-than-temporary impairment charges
of $2.7 billion in the three-month period ended
June 30, 2008 compared to $144 million in the same
period in 2007, primarily driven by severity losses on ABS
related to AIGs securities lending program.
Operating income for group retirement products and individual
fixed annuities decreased in the three-month period ended
June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007,
primarily as a result of increased net realized capital losses
due to higher other-than-temporary impairment charges, lower
partnership income, lower yield enhancement income and reduced
overall investment yield from increased levels of short-term
investments. These decreases were partially offset by decreases
in DAC amortization and sales inducement costs of
$164 million related to the net realized capital losses
compared to $58 million in the same period in 2007.
Individual variable annuities operating income decreased in the
three-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same
period in 2007, primarily due to a $31 million increase in
benefit reserves and related DAC amortization adjustment
reflecting changes in actuarial estimates and to increased net
realized capital losses largely due to higher
other-than-temporary impairment charges.
Year-to-Date
Domestic Retirement Services Results
Domestic Retirement Services results, presented on a
sub-product basis were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Net Realized | |
|
|
|
|
Premiums and | |
|
Net | |
|
Capital | |
|
|
|
Operating | |
|
|
Other | |
|
Investment | |
|
Gains | |
|
Total | |
|
Income | |
(in millions) |
|
Considerations | |
|
Income | |
|
(Losses) | |
|
Revenues | |
|
(Loss) | |
| |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group retirement products
|
|
$ |
218 |
|
|
$ |
982 |
|
|
$ |
(1,680 |
) |
|
$ |
(480 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,192 |
) |
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
(2,837 |
) |
|
|
(1,221 |
) |
|
|
(2,230 |
) |
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
(295 |
) |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
Individual annuities runoff*
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
(256 |
) |
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
574 |
|
|
$ |
2,789 |
|
|
$ |
(5,084 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,721 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,865 |
) |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group retirement products
|
|
$ |
217 |
|
|
$ |
1,211 |
|
|
$ |
(113 |
) |
|
$ |
1,315 |
|
|
$ |
541 |
|
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
1,895 |
|
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
1,777 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
Individual annuities runoff*
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
582 |
|
|
$ |
3,390 |
|
|
$ |
(290 |
) |
|
$ |
3,682 |
|
|
$ |
1,250 |
|
|
Percentage Increase/(Decrease) from Prior Year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group retirement products
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
(19 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Individual annuities runoff
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
(18 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
* |
Primarily represents runoff annuity business sold through
discontinued distribution relationships. |
Total revenues and operating income for Domestic Retirement
Services declined significantly in the six-month period ended
June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 primarily
due to significantly increased net realized capital losses and
lower partnership and yield enhancement income. Net realized
capital losses for Domestic Retirement Services increased
primarily due to higher other-than-temporary impairment charges
of $4.8 billion in the six-month period ended June 30,
2008 compared to $186 million in the same period in 2007.
Both group retirement products and individual fixed annuities
operating income in the six-month period ended June 30,
2008 decreased compared to the same period in 2007 primarily as
a result of increased net realized capital losses due to higher
other-than-temporary impairment charges, lower net investment
income due to lower partnership income of $289 million,
lower yield enhancement income of $152 million and reduced
overall investment yield from increased levels of short term
investments. These decreases were partially offset by decreases
in DAC amortization and sales inducement costs of
$329 million related to the net realized capital losses
compared to $55 million in the same period in 2007.
Individual variable annuities operating income decreased in the
six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same
period in 2007 primarily as a result of increased net realized
capital losses principally due to other-than-temporary
impairment charges. In addition, benefit reserves and DAC
amortization and sales inducement costs increased by a combined
$31 million due to changes in actuarial estimates, offset
by decreases in DAC amortization and sales inducement costs of
$56 million related to the net realized capital losses
compared to $6 million in the same period in 2007.
78
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
The account value roll forward for Domestic Retirement
Services by product was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
(in millions) |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
| |
Group retirement products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
65,640 |
|
|
$ |
65,216 |
|
|
$ |
68,109 |
|
|
$ |
64,357 |
|
|
Deposits annuities
|
|
|
1,472 |
|
|
|
1,463 |
|
|
|
2,925 |
|
|
|
2,881 |
|
|
Deposits mutual funds
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
1,843 |
|
|
|
1,793 |
|
|
|
3,720 |
|
|
|
3,676 |
|
|
Surrenders and other withdrawals
|
|
|
(1,282 |
) |
|
|
(1,487 |
) |
|
|
(2,772 |
) |
|
|
(3,412 |
) |
|
Death benefits
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
Net inflows (outflows)
|
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
Change in fair value of underlying investments, interest
credited, net of fees
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
2,234 |
|
|
|
(2,745 |
) |
|
|
3,195 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$ |
66,189 |
|
|
$ |
67,687 |
|
|
$ |
66,189 |
|
|
$ |
67,687 |
|
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
51,540 |
|
|
$ |
52,339 |
|
|
$ |
50,508 |
|
|
$ |
52,685 |
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
1,944 |
|
|
|
1,633 |
|
|
|
4,475 |
|
|
|
2,864 |
|
|
Surrenders and other withdrawals
|
|
|
(1,461 |
) |
|
|
(1,859 |
) |
|
|
(3,040 |
) |
|
|
(3,519 |
) |
|
Death benefits
|
|
|
(442 |
) |
|
|
(449 |
) |
|
|
(824 |
) |
|
|
(857 |
) |
|
|
Net inflows (outflows)
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(675 |
) |
|
|
611 |
|
|
|
(1,512 |
) |
|
Change in fair value of underlying investments, interest
credited, net of fees
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
958 |
|
|
|
997 |
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$ |
52,077 |
|
|
$ |
52,170 |
|
|
$ |
52,077 |
|
|
$ |
52,170 |
|
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
30,830 |
|
|
$ |
31,432 |
|
|
$ |
33,108 |
|
|
$ |
31,093 |
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
|
1,204 |
|
|
|
2,139 |
|
|
|
2,212 |
|
|
Surrenders and other withdrawals
|
|
|
(964 |
) |
|
|
(1,057 |
) |
|
|
(1,873 |
) |
|
|
(2,047 |
) |
|
Death benefits
|
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
Net inflows (outflows)
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
Change in fair value of underlying investments, interest
credited, net of fees
|
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
(2,457 |
) |
|
|
2,043 |
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$ |
30,667 |
|
|
$ |
33,051 |
|
|
$ |
30,667 |
|
|
$ |
33,051 |
|
|
Total Domestic Retirement Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
148,010 |
|
|
$ |
148,987 |
|
|
$ |
151,725 |
|
|
$ |
148,135 |
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
4,909 |
|
|
|
4,630 |
|
|
|
10,334 |
|
|
|
8,752 |
|
|
Surrenders and other withdrawals
|
|
|
(3,707 |
) |
|
|
(4,403 |
) |
|
|
(7,685 |
) |
|
|
(8,978 |
) |
|
Death benefits
|
|
|
(629 |
) |
|
|
(648 |
) |
|
|
(1,197 |
) |
|
|
(1,237 |
) |
|
|
Net inflows (outflows)
|
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
(421 |
) |
|
|
1,452 |
|
|
|
(1,463 |
) |
|
Change in fair value of underlying investments, interest
credited, net of fees
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
4,341 |
|
|
|
(4,244 |
) |
|
|
6,235 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
Balance at end of period, excluding runoff
|
|
|
148,933 |
|
|
|
152,908 |
|
|
|
148,933 |
|
|
|
152,908 |
|
|
Individual annuities runoff
|
|
|
5,476 |
|
|
|
5,977 |
|
|
|
5,476 |
|
|
|
5,977 |
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$ |
154,409 |
|
|
$ |
158,885 |
|
|
$ |
154,409 |
|
|
$ |
158,885 |
|
|
General and separate account reserves and mutual funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General account reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
91,467 |
|
|
$ |
90,729 |
|
|
Separate account reserve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,629 |
|
|
|
60,554 |
|
|
Total general and separate account reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,096 |
|
|
|
151,283 |
|
|
Group retirement mutual funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,313 |
|
|
|
7,602 |
|
|
Total reserves and mutual funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
154,409 |
|
|
$ |
158,885 |
|
|
The improvement in individual fixed annuity deposits was due to
a steepened yield curve, providing the opportunity to offer
higher interest crediting rates than certificates of deposits
(CDs) and mutual fund money market rates available at the time.
However, beginning in the three-month period ended June 30,
2008, CDs offering more competitive crediting rates than those
currently available on fixed annuities have started to slow
fixed annuity sales.
Domestic Retirement Services surrenders and other withdrawals
decreased in all product lines in the three and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same periods in
2007. In general, surrenders and other withdrawals decreased as
a result of the relative lack of attractive alternative
investment products. Group retirement surrenders and withdrawals
decreased as a result of a few large group mutual fund
surrenders in the first quarter of 2007 and a general reduction
in second quarter 2008 surrenders.
Domestic Retirement Services reserves by surrender charge
category and surrender rates were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Group | |
|
Individual | |
|
Individual | |
|
|
Retirement | |
|
Fixed | |
|
Variable | |
(in millions) |
|
Products* | |
|
Annuities | |
|
Annuities | |
| |
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No surrender charge
|
|
$ |
48,399 |
|
|
$ |
11,465 |
|
|
$ |
12,288 |
|
|
0% - 2%
|
|
|
2,659 |
|
|
|
3,519 |
|
|
|
4,545 |
|
|
Greater than 2% - 4%
|
|
|
3,309 |
|
|
|
7,325 |
|
|
|
4,002 |
|
|
Greater than 4%
|
|
|
2,621 |
|
|
|
26,441 |
|
|
|
9,524 |
|
|
Non-surrenderable
|
|
|
888 |
|
|
|
3,327 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
Total reserves
|
|
$ |
57,876 |
|
|
$ |
52,077 |
|
|
$ |
30,667 |
|
|
Surrender rates
|
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
11.8 |
% |
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No surrender charge
|
|
$ |
45,361 |
|
|
$ |
10,813 |
|
|
$ |
12,591 |
|
|
0% - 2%
|
|
|
6,734 |
|
|
|
4,068 |
|
|
|
5,424 |
|
|
Greater than 2% - 4%
|
|
|
3,872 |
|
|
|
6,665 |
|
|
|
5,589 |
|
|
Greater than 4%
|
|
|
3,241 |
|
|
|
27,182 |
|
|
|
9,355 |
|
|
Non-surrenderable
|
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
3,442 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
Total reserves
|
|
$ |
60,085 |
|
|
$ |
52,170 |
|
|
$ |
33,051 |
|
|
Surrender rates
|
|
|
10.4 |
% |
|
|
13.4 |
% |
|
|
12.8 |
% |
|
|
|
* |
Excludes mutual funds of $8.3 billion and
$7.6 billion at June 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. |
Surrender rates decreased for all three product lines in the
three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 compared
to the same periods in 2007. The surrender rate for individual
fixed annuities continues to be driven by the yield curve and
the general aging of the in-force block. However, less than
23 percent of the individual fixed annuity reserves as of
June 30, 2008 were available for surrender without charge.
An increase in the level of surrenders in any of these
businesses could accelerate the amortization of DAC and
negatively affect fee income earned on assets under management.
79
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Life Insurance & Retirement Services Net Investment
Income and Net Realized Capital Gains (Losses)
The components of net investment income for Life
Insurance & Retirement Services were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
(in millions) |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
| |
Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement Services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, including short-term investments
|
|
$ |
2,334 |
|
|
$ |
1,940 |
|
|
$ |
4,547 |
|
|
$ |
3,839 |
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
Interest on mortgage and other loans
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
Partnership income
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
Mutual funds
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
163 |
|
|
Trading account losses
|
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
Other(a)
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
Total investment income before policyholder income and trading
gains (losses)
|
|
|
2,642 |
|
|
|
2,367 |
|
|
|
4,965 |
|
|
|
4,527 |
|
|
Policyholder investment income and trading gains
(losses)(b)
|
|
|
606 |
|
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
1,876 |
|
|
|
Total investment income
|
|
|
3,248 |
|
|
|
3,446 |
|
|
|
4,809 |
|
|
|
6,403 |
|
|
Investment expenses
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$ |
3,162 |
|
|
$ |
3,361 |
|
|
$ |
4,610 |
|
|
$ |
6,244 |
|
|
Domestic Life Insurance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, including short-term investments
|
|
$ |
847 |
|
|
$ |
870 |
|
|
$ |
1,711 |
|
|
$ |
1,781 |
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
Interest on mortgage and other loans
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
Partnership income excluding Synfuels
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
Partnership loss Synfuels
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
Mutual funds
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
Other(a)
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
Total investment income before policyholder income and trading
gains (losses)
|
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
2,034 |
|
|
|
2,037 |
|
|
Policyholder investment income and trading gains
(losses)(b)
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income
|
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
2,022 |
|
|
|
2,037 |
|
|
Investment expenses
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$ |
1,006 |
|
|
$ |
1,006 |
|
|
$ |
1,990 |
|
|
$ |
2,011 |
|
|
Domestic Retirement Services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, including short-term investments
|
|
$ |
1,137 |
|
|
$ |
1,364 |
|
|
$ |
2,348 |
|
|
$ |
2,764 |
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
Interest on mortgage and other loans
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
Partnership income
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
Other(a)
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
Total investment income
|
|
|
1,434 |
|
|
|
1,777 |
|
|
|
2,820 |
|
|
|
3,419 |
|
|
Investment expenses
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$ |
1,418 |
|
|
$ |
1,765 |
|
|
$ |
2,789 |
|
|
$ |
3,390 |
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, including short-term investments
|
|
$ |
4,318 |
|
|
$ |
4,174 |
|
|
$ |
8,606 |
|
|
$ |
8,384 |
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
Interest on mortgage and other loans
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
774 |
|
|
|
685 |
|
|
Partnership income excluding Synfuels
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
Partnership loss Synfuels
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
Mutual funds
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
168 |
|
|
Trading account losses
|
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
Other(a)
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
Total investment income before policyholder income and trading
gains (losses)
|
|
|
5,086 |
|
|
|
5,161 |
|
|
|
9,819 |
|
|
|
9,983 |
|
|
Policyholder investment income and trading gains
(losses)(b)
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
1,876 |
|
|
|
Total investment income
|
|
|
5,703 |
|
|
|
6,240 |
|
|
|
9,651 |
|
|
|
11,859 |
|
|
Investment expenses
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$ |
5,586 |
|
|
$ |
6,132 |
|
|
$ |
9,389 |
|
|
$ |
11,645 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Includes real estate income, income on non-partnership
invested assets, securities lending and Foreign Life
Insurance & Retirement Services equal share of
the results of AIG Credit Card Company (Taiwan). |
(b) |
Relates principally to assets held in various trading
securities accounts that do not qualify for separate account
treatment under AICPA SOP
03-1, Accounting
and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for Certain
Nontraditional Long-Duration Contracts and for Separate
Accounts (SOP
03-1). These amounts
are principally offset by an equal change included in incurred
policy losses and benefits. |
Net investment income decreased $546 million and
$2.3 billion in the three- and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2008 compared to the same periods in 2007,
respectively, reflective of the recent market volatility. For
the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008,
policyholder trading gains (losses) were $617 million and
$(168) million, respectively, compared to gains of
$1.1 billion and $1.9 billion in the same period of
2007 reflecting equity market declines in Japan and Asia. In
addition, net investment income was negatively affected by
80
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
lower yield enhancement income from equity investments, and
higher trading account losses of $119 million and
$207 million for the three- and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2008 compared to the same periods in 2007.
Domestic Retirement Services held higher balances in cash and
short-term investments which negatively affected investment
income on fixed maturity securities. Historically, AIG generated
income tax credits as a result of investing in Synfuels related
to the partnership income (loss) shown in the table above.
Synfuel production ceased effective December 31, 2007.
The components of net realized capital gains (losses) for
Life Insurance & Retirement Services were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
Ended June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
(in millions) |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
| |
Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement Services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of fixed maturities
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
(25 |
) |
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
(45 |
) |
|
Sales of equity securities
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
Other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary
impairments(a)
|
|
|
(1,071 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
(2,087 |
) |
|
|
(462 |
) |
|
|
Foreign exchange transactions
|
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
Derivatives instruments
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
Other(b)
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
Total Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement Services
|
|
$ |
(909 |
) |
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
(1,631 |
) |
|
$ |
(217 |
) |
|
Domestic Life Insurance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of fixed maturities
|
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
$ |
(58 |
) |
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
$ |
(39 |
) |
|
Sales of equity securities
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
Other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary
impairments(a)
|
|
|
(1,440 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(2,659 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
Foreign exchange transactions
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
Derivatives instruments
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
Other(c)
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
Total Domestic Life Insurance
|
|
$ |
(1,376 |
) |
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,664 |
) |
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
|
Domestic Retirement Services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of fixed maturities
|
|
$ |
(55 |
) |
|
$ |
(79 |
) |
|
$ |
(63 |
) |
|
$ |
(60 |
) |
|
Sales of equity securities
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
Other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary
impairments(a)
|
|
|
(2,682 |
) |
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
(4,839 |
) |
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
Foreign exchange transactions
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
Derivatives instruments
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
Other(c)
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
Total Domestic Retirement Services
|
|
$ |
(2,725 |
) |
|
$ |
(281 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,084 |
) |
|
$ |
(290 |
) |
|
Total:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of fixed maturities
|
|
$ |
(54 |
) |
|
$ |
(162 |
) |
|
$ |
(57 |
) |
|
$ |
(144 |
) |
|
Sales of equity securities
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
Other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary
impairments(a)
|
|
|
(5,193 |
) |
|
|
(324 |
) |
|
|
(9,585 |
) |
|
|
(716 |
) |
|
|
Foreign exchange transactions
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
Derivatives instruments
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
Other(b)(c)
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
(5,010 |
) |
|
$ |
(279 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,379 |
) |
|
$ |
(535 |
) |
|
|
|
(a) |
See Invested Assets Portfolio Review
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments for additional information. |
(b) |
Includes losses of $167 million and gains of
$66 million allocated to participating policyholders for
the three-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, and losses of $178 million and
$5 million for the six-month periods ended June 30,
2008 and 2007, respectively. |
|
|
(c) |
Includes losses of $12 million and $143 million for
the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 for Domestic Life
Insurance and Domestic Retirement Services, respectively,
related to the adoption of FAS 157 related to embedded
policy derivatives. |
Included in net realized capital gains (losses) are gains
(losses) on sales of investments, derivative gains (losses) for
transactions that did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment
under FAS 133, foreign exchange gains and losses,
other-than-temporary impairments and the effects of the adoption
of FAS 157 further described below.
Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement Services net
realized capital losses were significantly higher in the first
six months of 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. The
increased Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement Services
other-than-temporary impairments were primarily driven by
severity losses and foreign currency declines. See Invested
Assets Portfolio Review herein for further
information. Foreign currency losses of $170 million and
$193 million in the three and six-month periods ended
June 30, 2008, respectively, related primarily to the
decline in value of U.S. dollar bonds supporting
liabilities denominated in Taiwan dollars, Singapore dollars,
Japanese yen and British pounds sterling. Derivatives in the
Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement Services operations
are primarily used to economically hedge cash flows related to
U.S. dollar bonds back to the respective currency of the
country, principally in Taiwan, Thailand and Singapore. These
derivatives do not
81
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
qualify for hedge accounting treatment under FAS 133 and
are recorded in net realized capital gains (losses). The
corresponding foreign exchange gain or loss with respect to the
economically hedged bond is deferred in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) until the bond is sold, matures or
deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired.
In the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008,
the Domestic Life Insurance and Domestic Retirement Services
operations incurred higher net realized capital losses primarily
due to other-than-temporary impairment charges related to
severity. Derivatives in the Domestic Life Insurance operations
include affiliated interest rate swaps used to economically
hedge cash flows on bonds and option contracts used to
economically hedge cash flows on indexed annuity and universal
life products. These derivatives do not qualify for hedge
accounting treatment under FAS 133 and are recorded in net
realized capital gains (losses). The corresponding gain or loss
with respect to the economically hedged bond is deferred in
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) until the bond is
sold, matures or is deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired.
The most significant effect of AIGs adoption of
FAS 157 was the change in measurement of fair value for
embedded policy derivatives. The pre-tax effect of adoption
related to embedded policy derivatives was an increase in net
realized capital losses of $155 million as of
January 1, 2008. The effect of initial adoption was
primarily due to an increase in the embedded policy derivative
liability valuations resulting from the inclusion of explicit
risk margins.
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs and Sales Inducement
Assets
DAC for Life Insurance & Retirement Services products
arises from the deferral of costs that vary with, and are
directly related to, the acquisition of new or renewal business.
Policy acquisition costs for life insurance products are
generally deferred and amortized over the premium paying period
in accordance with FAS 60, Accounting and Reporting
by Insurance Enterprises (FAS 60). Policy acquisition
costs that relate to universal life and investment-type products
are generally deferred and amortized, with interest in relation
to the incidence of estimated gross profits to be realized over
the estimated lives of the contracts in accordance with
FAS 97. Value of Business Acquired (VOBA) is
determined at the time of acquisition and is reported on the
consolidated balance sheet with DAC and amortized over the life
of the business, similar to DAC. AIG offers sales inducements to
contract holders (bonus interest) on certain annuity and
investment contracts. Sales inducements are recognized as part
of the liability for policyholders contract deposits on
the consolidated balance sheet and are amortized over the life
of the contract similar to DAC. The deferral of acquisition and
sales inducement costs increased $280 million in the
six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same
period in 2007 primarily due to higher production in the Foreign
Life Insurance operations and Domestic Retirement Services.
Total amortization expense increased by $81 million in the
six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same
period in 2007. The current year amortization includes a
$479 million increase to operating income related to net
realized capital losses in the first six months of 2008 compared
to $114 million in the same period of 2007 reflecting
significantly higher other-than-temporary impairment charges.
Annualized amortization expense levels in the first six months
of 2008 and 2007 were approximately 11 percent and
12 percent, respectively, of the opening DAC balance.
AIG adopted FAS 159 on January 1, 2008 and elected to
apply fair value accounting for an investment-linked product
sold principally in Asia. Upon fair value election, all DAC and
SIA are written off and there is no further deferral or
amortization of DAC and SIA for that product. The amounts of DAC
and SIA written off as of January 1, 2008 were
$1.1 billion and $299 million, respectively.
82
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
The major components of the changes in DAC/ VOBA and SIA were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, | |
|
|
| |
(in millions) | |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
| |
|
| |
|
|
DAC/VOBA | |
|
SIA | |
|
Total | |
|
DAC/VOBA | |
|
SIA | |
|
Total | |
| |
Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
26,175 |
|
|
$ |
681 |
|
|
$ |
26,856 |
|
|
$ |
21,153 |
|
|
$ |
404 |
|
|
$ |
21,557 |
|
Acquisition costs deferred
|
|
|
2,711 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
2,760 |
|
|
|
2,510 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
2,570 |
|
Amortization (charged) or credited to operating income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related to net realized capital gains (losses)
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
Related to unlocking future assumptions
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
All other amortization
|
|
|
(1,783 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(1,811 |
) |
|
|
(1,344 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(1,342 |
) |
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on securities
|
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
531 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
Increase (decrease) due to foreign exchange
|
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
783 |
|
|
|
(230 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(229 |
) |
Other*
|
|
|
(1,090 |
) |
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
(1,389 |
) |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$ |
27,542 |
|
|
$ |
405 |
|
|
$ |
27,947 |
|
|
$ |
22,617 |
|
|
$ |
477 |
|
|
$ |
23,094 |
|
|
Domestic Life Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
6,432 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
6,485 |
|
|
$ |
6,006 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
6,052 |
|
Acquisition costs deferred
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
Amortization (charged) or credited to operating income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related to net realized capital gains (losses)
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
All other amortization
|
|
|
(302 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
(344 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(347 |
) |
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on securities
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230 |
|
Increase (decrease) due to foreign exchange
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
Other*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$ |
6,799 |
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
$ |
6,857 |
|
|
$ |
6,319 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
6,372 |
|
|
Domestic Retirement Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
5,838 |
|
|
$ |
991 |
|
|
$ |
6,829 |
|
|
$ |
5,651 |
|
|
$ |
887 |
|
|
$ |
6,538 |
|
Acquisition costs deferred
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
Amortization (charged) or credited to operating income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related to net realized capital gains (losses)
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
Related to unlocking future assumptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
All other amortization
|
|
|
(409 |
) |
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
(501 |
) |
|
|
(445 |
) |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
(524 |
) |
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on securities
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
535 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
Increase (decrease) due to foreign exchange
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$ |
6,640 |
|
|
$ |
1,179 |
|
|
$ |
7,819 |
|
|
$ |
5,954 |
|
|
$ |
985 |
|
|
$ |
6,939 |
|
|
Total Life Insurance & Retirement Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
38,445 |
|
|
$ |
1,725 |
|
|
$ |
40,170 |
|
|
$ |
32,810 |
|
|
$ |
1,337 |
|
|
$ |
34,147 |
|
Acquisition costs deferred
|
|
|
3,612 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
3,779 |
|
|
|
3,328 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
3,499 |
|
Amortization (charged) or credited to operating income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related to net realized capital gains (losses)
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
Related to unlocking future assumptions
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
All other amortization
|
|
|
(2,494 |
) |
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
(2,619 |
) |
|
|
(2,133 |
) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(2,213 |
) |
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on securities
|
|
|
1,341 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
1,442 |
|
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
1,150 |
|
Increase (decrease) due to foreign exchange
|
|
|
765 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(184 |
) |
Other*
|
|
|
(1,090 |
) |
|
|
(299 |
) |
|
|
(1,389 |
) |
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$ |
40,981 |
|
|
$ |
1,642 |
|
|
$ |
42,623 |
|
|
$ |
34,890 |
|
|
$ |
1,515 |
|
|
$ |
36,405 |
|
|
|
|
* |
In 2008, primarily represents the cumulative effect of
adoption of FAS 159. In 2007, primarily represents the
cumulative effect of adoption of SOP 05-1. |
As AIG operates in various global markets, the estimated gross
profits used to amortize DAC, VOBA and SIA are subject to
differing market returns and interest rate environments in any
single period. The combination of market returns and interest
rates may lead to acceleration of amortization in some products
and regions and simultaneous deceleration of amortization in
other products and regions.
DAC, VOBA and SIA for insurance-oriented, investment-oriented
and retirement services products are reviewed for
recoverability, which involves estimating the future
profitability of current business. This review involves
significant management judgment. If actual future profitability
is substantially lower than estimated, AIGs DAC, VOBA and
SIA may be subject to an impairment
83
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
charge and AIGs results of operations could be
significantly affected in future periods.
Future Policy Benefit Reserves
Periodically, the net benefit reserves (policy benefit reserves
less DAC) established for Life Insurance & Retirement
Services companies are tested to ensure that, including
consideration of future expected premium payments, they are
adequate to provide for future policyholder benefit obligations.
The assumptions used to perform the tests are current
best-estimate assumptions as to policyholder mortality,
morbidity, terminations, company maintenance expenses and
invested asset returns. For long duration traditional business,
a lock-in principle applies, whereby the assumptions
used to calculate the benefit reserves and DAC are set when a
policy is issued and do not change with changes in actual
experience. These assumptions include margins for adverse
deviation in the event that actual experience might deviate from
these assumptions. For business in force outside of North
America, 46 percent of total policyholder benefit
liabilities at June 30, 2008 represent traditional business
where the lock-in principle applies. In most foreign locations,
various guarantees are embedded in policies in force that may
remain applicable for many decades into the future.
As experience changes over time, the best-estimate assumptions
are updated to reflect observed changes. Because of the
long-term nature of many of AIGs liabilities subject to
the lock-in principle, small changes in certain of the
assumptions may cause large changes in the degree of reserve
adequacy. In particular, changes in estimates of future invested
asset return assumptions have a large effect on the degree of
reserve adequacy.
Taiwan
Beginning in 2000, the yield available on Taiwanese
10-year government
bonds dropped from approximately 6 percent to
2.7 percent at June 30, 2008. Yields on most other
invested assets have correspondingly dropped over the same
period. Current sales are focused on products such as:
|
|
|
variable separate account products which do not contain interest
rate guarantees, |
|
|
participating products which contain very low implied interest
rate guarantees, and |
|
|
accident and health policies and riders. |
In developing the reserve adequacy analysis for Nan Shan,
several key best-estimate assumptions have been made:
|
|
|
Observed historical mortality improvement trends have been
projected to 2014; |
|
|
Morbidity, expense and termination rates have been updated to
reflect recent experience; |
|
|
Taiwan government bond rates are expected to remain at current
levels for 10 years and gradually increase to best-estimate
assumptions of a market consensus view of long-term interest
rate expectations; |
|
|
Foreign assets are assumed to comprise 35 percent of
invested assets, resulting in a composite long-term investment
assumption of approximately 4.8 percent; and |
|
|
The current practice permitted in Taiwan of offsetting positive
mortality experience with negative interest margins, thus
eliminating the need for mortality dividends, will continue. |
Future results of the reserve adequacy tests will involve
significant management judgment as to mortality, morbidity,
expense and termination rates and investment yields. Adverse
changes in these assumptions could accelerate DAC amortization
and necessitate reserve strengthening.
84
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Financial Services Operations
AIGs Financial Services subsidiaries engage in diversified
activities including aircraft and equipment leasing, capital
markets, consumer finance and insurance premium finance.
Financial Services Results
Financial Services results were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
|
|
June 30, | |
|
Percentage | |
|
June 30, | |
|
Percentage | |
|
|
| |
|
Increase/ | |
|
| |
|
Increase/ | |
(in millions) |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
Total revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft Leasing
|
|
$ |
1,298 |
|
|
$ |
1,173 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
$ |
2,463 |
|
|
$ |
2,231 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
Capital
Markets(a)
|
|
|
(6,088 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,831 |
) |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
Finance(b)
|
|
|
1,028 |
|
|
|
911 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
1,959 |
|
|
|
1,756 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
Other, including intercompany adjustments
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
(3,605 |
) |
|
$ |
2,123 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
(10,165 |
) |
|
$ |
4,324 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft Leasing
|
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
$ |
207 |
|
|
|
61 |
% |
|
$ |
555 |
|
|
$ |
371 |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
Capital
Markets(a)
|
|
|
(6,284 |
) |
|
|
(255 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,211 |
) |
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
Finance(b)
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, including intercompany adjustments
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
(5,905 |
) |
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
(14,677 |
) |
|
$ |
339 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(a) |
Revenues are shown net of interest expense of
$1.2 billion and $805 million in the three-month
periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and
$1.7 billion and $1.9 billion for the six-month
periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. In the
three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008, both
revenues and operating income (loss) include unrealized market
valuation losses of $5.6 billion and $14.7 billion,
respectively, on AIGFPs super senior credit default swap
portfolio. |
(b) |
The three-month and six-month periods ended June 30,
2007 included pre-tax charges of $50 million and
$178 million, respectively, in connection with domestic
Consumer Finances mortgage banking activities. Based on a
current evaluation of the estimated cost of implementing the
Supervisory Agreement entered into with the OTS, partial
reversals of these prior year charges included in the three- and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 were $25 million
and $43 million, respectively. |
Financial Services reported operating losses in the
three- and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2008 compared to operating income in
the same periods in 2007, primarily due to unrealized market
valuation losses of $5.6 billion and $14.7 billion in
the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008,
respectively, on AIGFPs super senior credit default swap
portfolio, the remaining operating loss resulting from the
change in credit spreads on AIGFPs other assets and
liabilities and a decline in operating income for AGF.
AGFs operating income declined in the three- and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same periods in
2007 primarily due to increases in the provision for finance
receivable losses and unfavorable variances related to
derivatives that economically hedge AGF debt. In addition, in
the three months ended June 30, 2008, AGF recorded a
pre-tax charge of $27 million resulting from AGFs
decision to cease its wholesale originations.
ILFC generated strong operating income growth in the three-and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same
periods in 2007, driven to a large extent by a larger aircraft
fleet, higher lease rates and higher utilization and lower
composite borrowing rates.
Aircraft Leasing
Aircraft Leasing operations represent the operations of ILFC,
which generates its revenues primarily from leasing new and used
commercial jet aircraft to foreign and domestic airlines.
Revenues also result from the remarketing of commercial aircraft
for ILFCs own account, and remarketing and fleet
management services for airlines and financial institutions.
ILFC finances its aircraft purchases primarily through the
issuance of debt instruments. ILFC economically hedges part of
its floating rate and substantially all of its foreign currency
denominated debt using interest rate and foreign currency
derivatives. Starting in the second quarter of 2007, ILFC began
applying hedge accounting to most of its derivatives. The
composite borrowing rates, which include the effect of
derivatives, at June 30, 2008 and 2007 were
4.74 percent and 5.25 percent, respectively.
ILFC typically contracts to re-lease aircraft before the end of
the existing lease term. For aircraft returned before the end of
the lease term, ILFC has generally been able to re-lease such
aircraft within two to six months of their return. As a lessor,
ILFC considers an aircraft idle or off
lease when the aircraft is not subject to a signed lease
agreement or signed letter of intent. During the three-month
period ended June 30, 2008, 16 planes were returned to
ILFC by bankrupt lessees. As of July 31, 2008, ILFC has
leased all of the 16 aircraft.
Quarterly Aircraft Leasing Results
ILFCs operating income increased in the three-month period
ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007.
Rental revenues increased by $130 million or
11 percent,
85
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
driven by a larger aircraft fleet, higher lease rates and higher
utilization. As of June 30, 2008, 947 aircraft in
ILFCs fleet were subject to operating leases compared to
894 aircraft as of June 30, 2007. ILFC had no aircraft off
lease at July 31, 2008. Flight equipment marketing revenues
increased by $26 million in the three-month period ended
June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 due to an
increase in aircraft sales. Interest expense decreased by
$41 million in the three-month period ended June 30,
2008 compared to the same period in 2007 as a result of lower
short-term interest rates. The increases in revenues were
partially offset by an increase in depreciation and a credit
value adjustment on derivatives. Depreciation expense increased
by $30 million, or 7 percent, in line with the increase in
the size of the aircraft fleet. In the three-month period ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007, the gains (losses) from hedging
activities that did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment
under FAS 133, including the related foreign exchange gains
and losses, were $(15) million and $24 million,
respectively, in both revenues and operating income. The net
derivative loss for the three-month period ended June 30,
2008 includes the effect of changes in AIGs credit spreads
of $11 million.
Year-to-Date
Aircraft Leasing Results
ILFCs operating income increased in the six-month period
ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007.
Rental revenues increased by $251 million or
11 percent, driven by a larger aircraft fleet, higher lease
rates and higher utilization. As of June 30, 2008,
947 aircraft in ILFCs fleet were subject to operating
leases compared to 894 aircraft as of June 30, 2007. ILFC
had no aircraft off lease at July 31, 2008, and all of the
new aircraft scheduled for delivery through 2009 have been
leased. Flight equipment marketing revenues increased by
$34 million in the six-month period ended June 30,
2008 compared to the same period in 2007 due to an increase in
aircraft sales. Interest expense decreased by $30 million
in the six-month period ended June 30, 2008, compared to
the same period in 2007, as a result of lower short-term
interest rates. The increases in revenues were partially offset
by an increase in depreciation and a credit value adjustment on
derivatives as a result of the adoption of FAS 157.
Depreciation expense increased by $75 million, or
9 percent, in line with the increase in the size of the
aircraft fleet. In the six-month period ended June 30, 2008
and 2007, the gains (losses) from hedging activities that did
not qualify for hedge accounting treatment under FAS 133,
including the related foreign exchange gains and losses, were
$(63) million and $(13) million, respectively, in both
revenues and operating income. The net derivative loss for the
six-month period ended June 30, 2008 includes the effect of
changes in AIGs credit spreads of $51 million, of
which $12 million represents the transition amount from the
adoption of FAS 157.
Capital Markets
Capital Markets represents the operations of AIGFP, which
engages as principal in a wide variety of financial
transactions, including standard and customized financial
products involving commodities, credit, currencies, energy,
equities and rates. The credit products include credit
protection written through credit default swaps on super senior
risk tranches of diversified pools of loans and debt securities.
AIGFP also invests in a diversified portfolio of securities and
principal investments and engages in borrowing activities
involving the issuance of standard and structured notes and
other securities, and entering into GIAs.
As Capital Markets is a transaction-oriented operation, current
and past revenues and operating results may not provide a basis
for predicting future performance. Through 2007, AIGs
Capital Markets operations derived a significant portion of
their revenues from hedged financial positions entered into in
connection with counterparty transactions. AIGFP also
participates as a dealer in a wide variety of financial
derivatives transactions. Revenues and operating income of the
Capital Markets operations and the percentage change in these
amounts for any given period are significantly affected by
changes in the fair value of AIGFPs assets and liabilities
and by the number, size and profitability of transactions
entered into during that period relative to those entered into
during the prior period. Generally, the realization of
transaction revenues as measured by the receipt of funds is not
a significant reporting event as the gain or loss on
AIGFPs trading transactions is currently reflected in
operating income as the fair values change from period to period.
AIGFPs products generally require sophisticated models and
significant management assumptions to determine fair values and,
particularly during times of market disruption, the absence of
observable market data can result in fair values at any given
balance sheet date that are not indicative of the ultimate
settlement values of the products.
Quarterly Capital Markets Results
Capital Markets reported an operating loss in the three-month
period ended June 30, 2008 compared to operating income in
the same period of 2007, primarily due to unrealized market
valuation losses related to AIGFPs super senior credit
default swap portfolio principally written on multi-sector CDOs.
Financial market conditions during the second quarter of 2008
were characterized by widening credit spreads.
In addition to writing credit protection on the super senior
risk layer on designated portfolios of loans or debt securities,
AIGFP also wrote protection on tranches below the super senior
risk layer. At June 30, 2008, the net notional amount of
the credit default swaps in the regulatory capital relief
portfolio written on tranches below the super senior
86
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
risk layer was $5.8 billion, with an estimated fair value
loss of $171 million.
At June 30, 2008, the notional amount, fair value and
unrealized market valuation loss of the AIGFP super senior
credit default swap portfolio, including certain regulatory
capital relief transactions, by asset class were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Unrealized Market | |
|
|
Valuation Loss | |
|
|
(Gain) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Fair | |
|
Three | |
|
Six | |
|
|
Value | |
|
Months | |
|
Months | |
|
|
Loss at | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
Notional | |
|
June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
(in millions) |
|
Amount | |
|
2008 | |
|
2008(a) | |
|
2008(a) | |
| |
Regulatory
Capital:(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate loans
|
|
$ |
172,717 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Prime residential mortgages
|
|
|
132,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other(c)(d)
|
|
|
1,619 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
306,948 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
Arbitrage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-sector
CDOs(e)
|
|
|
80,301 |
|
|
|
24,785 |
|
|
|
5,569 |
|
|
|
13,606 |
|
|
Corporate debt/ CLOs
|
|
|
53,767 |
|
|
|
996 |
|
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
770 |
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
134,068 |
|
|
|
25,781 |
|
|
|
5,443 |
|
|
|
14,376 |
|
|
Mezzanine
tranches(f)
|
|
|
5,824 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
171 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
446,840 |
|
|
$ |
26,077 |
(g) |
|
$ |
5,565 |
|
|
$ |
14,672 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Includes credit valuation adjustment gains of
$44 million and $109 million, respectively, for the
three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008. |
(b) |
Represents predominantly transactions written to facilitate
regulatory capital relief. |
|
|
(c) |
Represents transactions where AIGFP believes the
counterparties are no longer using the transactions to obtain
regulatory capital relief. |
|
|
(d) |
During the second quarter of 2008, a European RMBS regulatory
capital relief transaction with a notional amount of
$1.6 billion was not terminated as expected when it no
longer provided regulatory capital relief to the
counterparty. |
|
|
(e) |
Approximately $57.8 billion in net notional amount includes
some exposure to U.S. sub-prime mortgages and approximately
$9.6 billion in net notional amount includes CDOs of
CMBS. |
(f) |
Represents credit default swaps written by AIGFP on tranches
below super senior on certain regulatory capital relief
trades. |
|
|
(g) |
Fair value amounts are shown before the effects of
counterparty netting adjustments. |
During the second quarter of 2008, AIGFP implemented further
refinements to the cash flow waterfall used by the BET model and
the assumptions used therein. These refinements reflected the
ability of a CDO to use principal proceeds to cover interest
payment obligations on lower-rated tranches, the ability of a
CDO to use principal proceeds to cure a breach of an
overcollateralization test, the ability of a CDO to amortize
certain senior CDO tranches on a pro-rata or sequential basis
and the preferential payment of management fees. To the extent
there is a lag in the prices provided by the collateral
managers, AIG refines those prices by rolling them forward to
the end of the quarter using prices provided by a third party
pricing service. The net effect of these refinements was an
incremental unrealized market valuation loss of
$342 million. Refinements made during the first quarter of
2008 had only a de minimus effect on the unrealized market
valuation loss.
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, AIGFP issued
new 2a-7 Puts on the
super senior security issued by a CDO of AAA-rated commercial
mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) pursuant to a facility that
was entered into in 2005. The terms of the facility required
AIGFP to issue such options up to a notional amount of
$7.5 billion. Approximately $2.1 billion were issued
in November 2007 with the remainder issued in June 2008. Under
the terms of the put options, AIGFP is required to purchase the
referenced super senior obligations in the event of a failed
remarketing of those securities. Upon the exercise of the put
options, the counterparty will provide funding to AIGFP to
purchase and hold the referenced super senior obligations for a
period ranging from three to six years. At this time, AIGFP
is not party to any commitments to enter into any new 2a-7 Puts.
Included in the unrealized market valuation loss of the super
senior credit default swap portfolio for the second quarter of
2008 was a loss of $810 million resulting from the change
in fair value of these newly issued
2a-7 Puts.
In May 2008, AIGFP extinguished its obligations with respect to
a credit default swap by purchasing the protected CDO security
for $103 million, its principal amount outstanding related
to this obligation. Additionally, AIGFP purchased $682 million
of other super senior CDO securities in connection with
2a-7 Puts. Upon
purchase, these securities were included in AIGFPs trading
portfolio at their fair value. Approximately $67 million of
the cumulative unrealized market valuation loss previously
recognized on these derivatives as of March 31, 2008 was
realized as a result of these purchases.
The change in fair value of AIGFPs credit default swaps
was caused by the significant widening in spreads and the
downgrades of RMBS and CDO securities by rating agencies in the
six-month period ended June 30, 2008 driven by the credit
concerns resulting from U.S. residential mortgages, the
severe liquidity crisis affecting the markets and the effects of
rating agency downgrades on structured securities.
Capital markets net operating loss for the three-month period
ended June 30, 2008 includes a net loss of
$474 million representing the effect of changes in credit
spreads on the valuation of AIGFPs assets and liabilities,
including $44 million of gains reflected in the unrealized
market valuation loss on super senior credit default swaps.
Losses of $362 million on the assets were primarily due to
continued significant widening of credit spreads on CDOs and ABS
products, which represent a significant portion of AIGFPs
investment portfolio. While historically AIGs credit
spreads and those on its assets moved in a similar fashion, that
relationship did not exist in the second quarter of 2008. Credit
spreads on the ABS and CDO investments widened significantly
more than the widening in AIGs credit spreads.
Furthermore, while AIGs credit spreads increased during
the second quarter of 2008, the credit valuation adjustment on
its
87
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
liabilities decreased due to a decline in AIGFPs
outstanding debt obligations and the shortened maturity of its
liabilities.
The following table presents AIGFPs credit spread gains
(losses) for the three-month period ended June 30, 2008
(excluding intercompany transactions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) | |
| |
Counterparty Credit Spread | |
|
AIG Inc.s Own Credit Spread | |
Sensitivity on Assets | |
|
Sensitivity on Liabilities | |
| |
|
| |
Trading securities
|
|
$ |
(503 |
) |
|
Term notes |
|
$ |
(79 |
) |
Loans and other assets
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
Hybrid term notes |
|
|
(47 |
) |
Derivative assets
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
GIAs |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities* |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in assets
|
|
$ |
(362 |
) |
|
Increase in liabilities |
|
$ |
(112 |
) |
|
|
|
Net pre-tax decrease to other income
|
|
$ |
(474 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Includes super senior CDS portfolio |
During 2008, AIGFPs revenues from certain products have
declined, in part, as a consequence of the continued disruption
in the credit markets, the general decline in liquidity in the
marketplace, and AIGFPs efforts to manage its liquidity.
Furthermore, AIGFP has not been able to replace revenues
previously generated from certain structured tax transactions
that were terminated or matured at the end of 2007 and early
2008.
The most significant component of Capital Markets operating
expenses is compensation, which was $155 million and
$153 million in the three-month periods ended June 30,
2008 and 2007, respectively. The amount of compensation was not
affected by gains and losses arising from derivatives not
qualifying for hedge accounting treatment under FAS 133. In
the first quarter of 2008, AIGFP established an employee
retention plan, which guarantees a broad group of AIGFPs
employees and consultants a minimum level of compensation for
each of the 2008 and 2009 compensation years, subject to
mandatory partial deferral which, in certain circumstances, will
be indexed to the price of AIG stock. The deferred amounts may
be reduced in the event of losses prior to payment. The expense
related to the plan is being recognized over the vesting period,
beginning in the first quarter of 2008.
AIGFP recognized a gain of $196 million in the three-month
period ended June 30, 2007 on hybrid financial instruments
for which it applied the fair value option under FAS 155,
Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial
Instruments an amendment of FASB Statements
No. 133 and 140 (FAS 155). These amounts were
largely offset by gains and losses on economic hedge positions
also reflected in AIGFPs operating income or loss.
Year-to-Date
Capital Markets Results
Capital Markets reported an increased operating loss in the
six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the
operating loss in the same period of 2007, primarily due to
unrealized market valuation losses related to AIGFPs super
senior credit default swap portfolio principally written on
multi-sector CDOs. Financial market conditions in the six-month
period ended June 30, 2008 were characterized by widening
credit spreads and declining interest rates.
The net loss recognized for the six-month period ended
June 30, 2007 included a $166 million reduction in
fair value of certain derivatives that are an integral part of,
and economically hedge, the structured transactions potentially
affected by the proposed guidance by the U.S. Treasury
Department affecting the ability to claim foreign tax credits.
Effective January 1, 2008, AIGFP adopted FAS 157. The
most significant effect of adopting FAS 157 was a change in
the valuation methodologies for hybrid financial instruments and
derivative liabilities (both freestanding and embedded)
historically carried at fair value. The changes were primarily
to incorporate AIGFPs own credit risk, when appropriate,
in the fair value measurements.
Effective January 1, 2008, AIGFP also elected to apply the
fair value option under FAS 159 to all eligible assets and
liabilities, other than equity method investments and trade
receivables and trade payables. Electing the fair value option
allows AIGFP to more closely align its earnings with the
economics of its transactions by recognizing the change in fair
value of its derivatives and the offsetting change in fair value
of the assets and liabilities being hedged concurrently through
earnings.
Capital Markets net operating loss for the six-month period
ended June 30, 2008 includes an increase to pre-tax
earnings of $2.5 billion attributable to changes in
AIGs credit spreads, including $109 million of gains
reflected in the unrealized market valuation loss on super
senior credit default swaps, which were offset by the effect of
changes in counterparty credit spreads on assets measured at
fair value of $3.0 billion. Included in the six-month
period ended June 30, 2008 net operating loss is the
transition amount of $291 million related to the adoption
of FAS 157 and FAS 159, as well as a credit valuation
adjustment gain of $193 million for derivatives AIGFP
entered into with other AIG entities, which is eliminated in
consolidation.
88
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
The following table presents AIGFPs credit spread gains
(losses) for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008
(excluding intercompany transactions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) | |
| |
Counterparty Credit Spread | |
|
AIG Inc.s Own Credit Spread | |
Sensitivity on Assets | |
|
Sensitivity on Liabilities | |
| |
|
| |
Trading securities
|
|
$ |
(2,651 |
) |
|
Term notes |
|
$ |
182 |
|
Loans and other assets
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
Hybrid term notes |
|
|
615 |
|
Derivative assets
|
|
|
(303 |
) |
|
GIAs |
|
|
1,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities* |
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
|
Decrease in assets
|
|
$ |
(2,982 |
) |
|
Decrease in liabilities |
|
$ |
2,536 |
|
|
|
|
Net pre-tax decrease to other income
|
|
$ |
(446 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Includes super senior CDS portfolio |
AIGFP recognized a gain of $30 million in the six-month
period ended June 30, 2007 on hybrid financial instruments
for which it applied the fair value option under FAS 155.
These amounts were largely offset by gains and losses on
economic hedge positions also reflected in AIGFPs
operating income or loss.
Capital Markets compensation expense was $298 million and
$276 million in the six-month periods ended June 30,
2008 and 2007, respectively. The amount of compensation was not
affected by gains and losses arising from derivatives not
qualifying for hedge accounting treatment under FAS 133.
Consumer Finance
AIGs Consumer Finance operations in North America are
principally conducted through AGF. AGF derives most of its
revenues from finance charges assessed on outstanding real
estate loans, secured and unsecured non-real estate loans and
retail sales finance receivables and credit-related insurance.
Effective February 29, 2008, AGF purchased a portion of
Equity One, Inc.s consumer branch finance receivable
portfolio consisting of $1.0 billion of real estate loans,
$290 million of non-real estate loans, and
$156 million of retail sales finance receivables.
AIGs foreign consumer finance operations are principally
conducted through AIG Consumer Finance Group, Inc. (AIGCFG).
AIGCFG operates primarily in emerging and developing markets.
AIGCFG has operations in Argentina, China, Hong Kong, Mexico,
Philippines, Poland, Taiwan, Thailand, India and Colombia. In
April 2008, AIGCFG decided to sell or liquidate its existing
operations in Taiwan.
Certain of the AIGCFG operations are partly or wholly owned by
life insurance subsidiaries of AIG. Accordingly, the financial
results of those companies are allocated between Financial
Services and Life Insurance & Retirement Services
according to their ownership percentages. While products vary by
market, the businesses generally provide credit cards, unsecured
and secured non-real estate loans, term deposits, savings
accounts, retail sales finance and real estate loans. AIGCFG
originates finance receivables through its branches and direct
solicitation. AIGCFG also originates finance receivables
indirectly through relationships with retailers, auto dealers,
and independent agents.
Quarterly Consumer Finance Results
Consumer Finance operating income decreased in the three-month
period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in
2007. Operating income from the domestic consumer finance
operations, which include the operations of AGF and AIG Federal
Savings Bank, decreased by $115 million in the three-month
period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in
2007. In the three-month period ended June 30, 2007,
domestic results were adversely affected by the weakening
housing market, which resulted in lower originations of real
estate loans as well as the additional $50 million charge
relating to the estimated cost of implementing the Supervisory
Agreement entered into with the OTS.
AGFs revenues increased $29 million or 4 percent
during the three-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared
to the same period in 2007. Revenues from AGFs finance
receivables benefited from the $1.5 billion finance
receivable purchase in first quarter 2008, but were partially
offset by reduced residential mortgage originations reflecting
the slower U.S. housing market. Revenues from AGFs
mortgage banking activities increased $55 million during
the three-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the
same period in 2007 (which included the second quarter 2007
charge of $50 million related to the Supervisory
Agreement). Based on a current evaluation of the estimated cost
of implementing the Supervisory Agreement entered into with the
OTS, a partial reversal of $25 million of these prior year
charges was recorded in the second quarter of 2008.
During 2007 and the six months ended June 30, 2008, the
U.S. residential real estate and credit markets experienced
significant turmoil as housing prices softened, unemployment
increased, consumer delinquencies increased, and credit
availability contracted and became more expensive for consumers
and financial institutions. These market developments are
reflected in AGFs decline in operating income in 2007 and
2008. AGFs operating income declined in the three-month
period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in
2007 primarily due to increases in the provision for finance
receivable loss of $153 million and unfavorable variances
related to derivatives that economically hedge AGF debt. During
the three-month period ended June 30, 2008, AGF recorded a
net gain of $5 million on its derivatives that did not
qualify for hedge accounting under FAS 133, compared to a
net gain of $17 million in the same period in 2007. The net
derivative
89
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
gain for the three-month period ended June 30, 2008
reflected the effect of changes in AIGs credit spreads.
AGFs operating income also reflected a pre-tax charge of
$27 million resulting from AGFs decision to cease its
wholesale originations.
AGFs net finance receivables totaled $26.5 billion at
June 30, 2008, an increase of approximately
$1.6 billion compared to the prior year period, including
the purchase of $1.5 billion of finance receivables from
Equity One, Inc. on February 29, 2008. The increase in the
net finance receivables resulted in a similar increase in
revenues generated from these assets.
Revenues from the foreign consumer finance operations increased
by 50 percent in the three-month period ended June 30,
2008 compared to the same period in 2007. Loan growth,
particularly in Poland, Mexico and Latin America, was the
primary driver of the increased revenues. In addition, revenues
from recently acquired businesses in India and Thailand
contributed to the increase. The increase in revenues was more
than offset by higher expenses associated with branch
expansions, acquisition activities and product promotion
campaigns.
Year-to-Date
Consumer Finance Results
Consumer Finance operating income decreased in the six-month
period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in
2007. Operating income from the domestic consumer finance
operations, which include the operations of AGF and AIG Federal
Savings Bank, decreased by $190 million in the six-month
period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in
2007. In the six-month period ended June 30, 2007, domestic
results were adversely affected by the weakening housing market,
which resulted in lower originations of real estate loans as
well as the $178 million charge relating to the estimated
cost of implementing the Supervisory Agreement entered into with
the OTS.
AGFs revenues increased $52 million or 4 percent
during the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to
the same period in 2007. Revenues from AGFs finance
receivables benefited from the $1.5 billion finance
receivable purchase in first quarter 2008, but were partially
offset by reduced residential mortgage originations reflecting
the slower U.S. housing market. Revenues from AGFs
mortgage banking activities increased $165 million during
the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the
same period in 2007 (which included a charge of
$178 million related to the Supervisory Agreement in the
six-month period ended June 30, 2007). Prior year charges
of $43 million were reversed in the six months ended
June 30, 2008, related to the Supervisory Agreement. The
six-month period ended June 30, 2007 included a recovery of
$65 million from a favorable out of court settlement.
AGFs operating income declined in the six-month period
ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007
primarily due to increases in the provision for finance
receivable loss of $273 million and unfavorable variances
related to derivatives that economically hedge AGF debt. During
the six-month period ended June 30, 2008, AGF recorded a
net loss of $38 million on its derivatives that did not
qualify for hedge accounting under FAS 133, including the
related foreign exchange losses, compared to a net loss of
$19 million in the same period in 2007. The net derivative
loss for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 includes
the effect of changes in AIGs credit spreads amounting to
$34 million, of which $13 million represents the
transition amount from the adoption of FAS 157. AGFs
operating income also reflected a pre-tax charge of
$27 million resulting from AGFs decision to cease its
wholesale originations.
Revenues from the foreign consumer finance operations increased
by 45 percent in the six-month period ended June 30,
2008 compared to the same period in 2007. Loan growth,
particularly in Poland, Mexico and Latin America, was the
primary driver of the increased revenues. In addition, revenues
from recently acquired businesses in India and Thailand
contributed to the increase. The increase in revenues was more
than offset by higher expenses associated with branch
expansions, acquisition activities and product promotion
campaigns.
Credit Quality of Finance Receivables
The overall credit quality of AGFs finance receivables
portfolio deteriorated during the six-month period ended
June 30, 2008 due to negative economic fundamentals, the
aging of the real estate loan portfolio and a higher proportion
of non-real estate loans and retail sales finance receivables.
At June 30, 2008, the
60-day delinquency rate
for the entire portfolio increased by 138 basis points to
3.56 percent compared to the same period in 2007, while the
60-day delinquency rate
for the real estate loans increased by 155 basis points to
3.50 percent. For the three-month period ended
June 30, 2008, AGFs net charge-off rate increased to
1.73 percent compared to 1.02 percent for the same
period in 2007 and for the six-month period ended June 30,
2008 increased to 1.64 percent compared to
1.00 percent for the same period in 2007.
AGFs allowance for finance receivable losses as a
percentage of outstanding receivables was 3.02 percent at
June 30, 2008 compared to 2.04 percent at
June 30, 2007.
Asset Management Operations
AIGs Asset Management operations comprise a wide variety
of investment-related services and investment products. These
services and products are offered to individuals, pension funds
and institutions (including AIG subsidiaries)
90
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
globally through AIGs Spread-Based Investment business,
Institutional Asset Management, and Brokerage Services and
Mutual Funds business. Also included in Asset Management
operations are the results of certain SunAmerica sponsored
partnership investments.
Revenues and operating income (loss) for Asset Management are
affected by the general conditions in the equity and credit
markets. In addition, net realized gains and carried interest
revenues are contingent upon various fund closings, maturity
levels, investment management performance and market conditions.
Spread-Based Investment Business
AIGs Spread-Based Investment business includes the results
of AIGs proprietary Spread-Based Investment operations,
the Matched Investment Program (MIP), which was launched in
September of 2005 to replace the Guaranteed Investment Contract
(GIC) program, which is in runoff whereby no new GIC
contracts are being written. The MIP is an investment strategy
that involves investing in various asset classes with financing
provided through third parties. This business uses various risk
mitigating strategies designed to hedge interest rate and
currency risk associated with underlying investments and related
liabilities.
Institutional Asset Management
AIGs Institutional Asset Management business, conducted
through AIG Investments, provides an array of investment
products and services globally to institutional investors,
pension funds, AIG subsidiaries and high net worth investors.
These products include traditional equity and fixed maturity
securities, and a wide range of alternative asset classes. These
services include investment advisory and subadvisory services,
investment monitoring, securities lending and transaction
structuring. Within the fixed maturity and equity asset classes,
AIG Investments offers various forms of structured investments
aimed at achieving superior returns or capital preservation.
Within the alternative asset class, AIG Investments offers hedge
and private equity funds and
fund-of-funds, direct
investments and distressed debt investments.
AIG Global Real Estate provides a wide range of real estate
investment and management services for AIG subsidiaries, as well
as for third-party institutional investors, high net worth
investors and pension funds. Through a strategic network of
local real estate ventures, AIG Global Real Estate actively
invests in and develops office, industrial, multi-family
residential, retail, mixed-use hotel and resort properties
located around the world.
AIG Private Bank offers banking, trading and investment
management services to private clients and institutions
globally. To further focus on its wealth management expansion
efforts, AIG Private Bank Ltd. entered into a joint venture
agreement with Bank Sarasin & Co. Ltd. Under this
agreement, a new Swiss bank was established, into which both AIG
Private Bank Ltd. and Bank Sarasin & Co. Ltd.
contributed their retail banking businesses. The new bank
commenced operations on July 1, 2008 with assets under
management of approximately $8 billion.
From time to time, AIG Investments acquires warehoused assets.
During the warehousing period, AIG bears the cost and risks
associated with carrying these investments and consolidates them
on its balance sheet and records the operating results until the
investments are transferred, sold or otherwise divested. Changes
in market conditions may negatively affect the fair value of
these warehoused investments. Market conditions may impede AIG
from launching new investment products for which these
warehoused assets are being held. Market conditions may also
prevent AIG from recovering its investment upon transfer or
divestment. In the event that AIG is unable to transfer or
otherwise divest its interest in the warehoused investment to
third parties, AIG could be required to hold these investments
indefinitely. In certain instances, the consolidated warehoused
investments are not wholly owned by AIG. In such cases, AIG
shares the risk associated with warehousing the asset with the
minority interest investors.
Brokerage Services and Mutual Funds
AIGs Brokerage Services and Mutual Funds business,
conducted through AIG Advisor Group, Inc. and AIG SunAmerica
Asset Management Corp., provides broker-dealer related services
and mutual funds to retail investors, group trusts and corporate
accounts through an independent network of financial advisors.
AIG Advisor Group, Inc., a subsidiary of AIG Retirement
Services, Inc., is comprised of several broker-dealer entities
that provide these services to clients primarily in the
U.S. marketplace. AIG SunAmerica Asset Management Corp.
manages, advises and/or administers retail mutual funds, as well
as the underlying assets of variable annuities sold by AIG
SunAmerica and VALIC to individuals and groups throughout the
United States.
Other Asset Management
Included in Other Asset Management is income or loss from
certain AIG SunAmerica sponsored partnerships and partnership
investments. Partnership assets consist of investments in a
diversified portfolio of private equity funds, affordable
housing partnerships and hedge fund investments.
91
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Asset Management Results
Asset Management results were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Percentage |
|
Six Months |
|
Percentage |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Increase/ |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Increase/ |
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Total revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spread-Based Investment business
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
734 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
(807 |
) |
|
$ |
1,749 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
Institutional Asset Management
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
(21) |
|
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
|
1,298 |
|
|
|
(7) |
|
|
Brokerage Services and Mutual Funds
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
(10) |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
(8) |
|
|
Other Asset Management
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
(65) |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
(60) |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
797 |
|
|
$ |
1,781 |
|
|
|
(55) |
% |
|
$ |
648 |
|
|
$ |
3,450 |
|
|
|
(81) |
% |
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spread-Based Investment business
|
|
$ |
(420 |
) |
|
$ |
244 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
(1,671 |
) |
|
$ |
735 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
Institutional Asset Management
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
(90) |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brokerage Services and Mutual Funds
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(19) |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
(23) |
|
|
Other Asset Management
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
(67) |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
(62) |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
(314 |
) |
|
$ |
927 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
$ |
(1,565 |
) |
|
$ |
1,685 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
Asset Management recognized operating losses in the three-and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 compared to operating
income in the same periods in 2007, primarily due to
other-than-temporary impairment charges on fixed income
investments, significantly lower partnership income, and lower
carried interest revenues. Included in the second quarter 2007
operating income was a gain on the sale of a portion of
AIGs investment in The Blackstone Group L.P. in connection
with its initial public offering.
Quarterly Spread-Based Investment Business Results
The Spread-Based Investment business reported an operating loss
in the three-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to
operating income in the same period in 2007 due to significantly
higher net realized capital losses and lower partnership income.
Included in the operating loss were net realized capital losses
of $549 million for the three-month period ended June 30,
2008, compared to $67 million in the 2007 period. Net
realized capital losses for the three-month period ended
June 30, 2008 primarily consist of $880 million in
other-than-temporary impairment charges on fixed maturity
securities for both the GIC and MIP portfolios, partially offset
by net mark to market gains of $255 million on interest rate and
foreign exchange hedges not qualifying for hedge accounting
treatment for both the GIC and MIP and net foreign exchange
gains on foreign currency denominated GIC and MIP liabilities.
Net realized capital losses of $67 million for the
three-month period ended June 30, 2007 primarily reflect
$86 million of net mark to market losses on interest rate
and foreign exchange hedges, partially offset by net foreign
exchange related gains on the MIP and GIC.
The other-than-temporary impairment charges on fixed maturity
securities held in the GIC and MIP portfolios were $522 million
for the GIC and $358 million for the MIP for the three-month
period ended June 30, 2008. These impairments primarily
resulted from severity losses. See Invested Assets
Portfolio Review Other-Than-Temporary Impairments.
In addition to the other-than-temporary impairments, unrealized
losses on fixed maturity securities were recorded in accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) and were primarily driven by
price declines resulting from decreased market liquidity,
partially offset by unrealized gains resulting from falling
interest rates.
In the GIC program, income from partnership investments declined
$237 million for the three-month period ended June 30,
2008, compared to the same period of 2007, reflecting
significantly higher returns in the 2007 period and weaker
market conditions in 2008. Partially offsetting this decline
were foreign exchange gains on foreign currency denominated GIC
reserves, which increased by $76 million in the three-month
period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same period in
2007 as a result of the weakening of the U.S. dollar. As
noted below, a significant portion of these GIC reserves mature
in 2008.
The MIP experienced net mark to market gains of
$253 million in the second quarter of 2008 due primarily to
interest rate and foreign exchange derivative positions that,
while partially effective in hedging interest rate and foreign
exchange risk, did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment
and an additional $22 million in mark to market gains due
to credit default swap investments. The MIP invests in credit
default swaps comprised predominantly of single-name high-grade
corporate exposures. The mark to market gains for the
three-month period ended June 30, 2008 were driven
primarily by an increase in interest rates and the tightening of
corporate credit spreads. AIG enters into hedging arrangements
to mitigate the effect of changes in currency and interest rates
associated with the fixed and floating rate and foreign currency
denominated obligations issued under these programs. Some of
these hedging relationships qualify for hedge accounting
treatment, while others do not. Income or loss from these hedges
not qualifying for hedge accounting
92
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
treatment are classified as net realized capital gains (losses)
in AIGs Consolidated Statement of Income (Loss).
Year-to-Date
Spread-Based Investment Business Results
The Spread-Based Investment business reported an operating loss
in the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to
operating income in the same period in 2007 due to significantly
higher net realized capital losses and lower partnership income.
Included in the operating loss were net realized capital losses
of $1.9 billion for the six-month period ended June 30,
2008, compared to $87 million in the same period in 2007.
Net realized capital losses for the six-month period ended
June 30, 2008 primarily consist of $1.9 billion in
other-than-temporary impairment charges on fixed maturity
securities for both the GIC and MIP, $325 million in foreign
exchange related losses on foreign denominated GIC reserves and
mark to market losses of $109 million on credit default swap
investments held by the MIP. Partially offsetting these losses
were net mark to market gains of $414 million on interest rate
and foreign exchange hedges not qualifying for hedge accounting
treatment for both the GIC and MIP. Net realized capital losses
of $87 million for the six-month period ended June 30,
2007 primarily reflect $30 million of other-than-temporary
impairment charges, $89 million of net foreign exchange related
losses on foreign denominated, liabilities in both the GIC and
MIP and $29 million in net mark to market losses on
interest rate and foreign exchange hedges, partially offset by
realized gains of $43 million on the sale of fixed maturity and
equity securities in the GIC.
The other-than-temporary impairment charges on fixed maturity
securities held in the GIC and MIP portfolios were $1.1 billion
for the GIC and $852 million for the MIP for the six-month
period ended June 30, 2008, primarily resulting from
severity losses. See Invested Assets Portfolio
Review Other-Than-Temporary Impairments. In addition
to the other-than-temporary impairments, unrealized losses on
fixed maturity securities were recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) and were primarily driven by price
declines resulting from decreased market liquidity, partially
offset by unrealized gains resulting from falling interest rates.
In the GIC program, income from partnership investments was $44
million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008, a
decline of $654 million from the same period of 2007 due to
significantly higher returns in the 2007 period and weaker
market conditions in 2008. Also contributing to the decline was
the one-time distribution from a single partnership of
$164 million in the six-month period ended June 30,
2007. Foreign exchange losses on foreign-denominated GIC
reserves increased by $221 million in the six-month period ended
June 30, 2008 as a result of the weakening of the
U.S. dollar. As noted below, a significant portion of these
GIC reserves mature in the next twelve months. Partially
offsetting the decline in partnership income and increased
foreign exchange losses was an increase in net mark to market
gains on derivative positions of $464 million. These gains
included net mark to market gains on interest rate and foreign
exchange derivatives used to economically hedge the effect of
interest rate and foreign exchange rate movements on GIC
reserves. Although these economic hedges are partially effective
in hedging the interest rate and foreign exchange risk, they did
not qualify for hedge accounting treatment.
The MIP experienced net mark to market losses of
$79 million for the six-month period ended June 30,
2008, due primarily to interest rate and foreign exchange
derivative positions that, while partially effective in hedging
interest rate and foreign exchange risk, did not qualify for
hedge accounting treatment and an additional $109 million
in net mark to market losses were recognized due to credit
default swap investments. These net mark to market losses were
driven primarily by a decline in interest rates, a decline in
value of the U.S. dollar and the widening of corporate
credit spreads.
AIG did not issue any additional debt to fund the MIP in the
six-month period ended June 30, 2008. Through June 30,
2008, the MIP had cumulative debt issuances of
$13.4 billion.
The GIC is in runoff with no new GICs issued subsequent to
2006. The anticipated runoff of the domestic GIC portfolio at
June 30, 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Less Than | |
|
1-3 | |
|
3(+)-5 | |
|
Over Five | |
|
|
(in billions) |
|
One Year | |
|
Years | |
|
Years | |
|
Years | |
|
Total | |
|
Domestic GICs
|
|
$ |
11.2 |
|
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
|
|
$5.6 |
|
|
$ |
23.0 |
|
|
It is expected that available cash, cash flows from investments
and sales of investments on an opportunistic basis in
anticipation of cash needs throughout the year will be
sufficient to repay GIC liabilities as they mature.
Quarterly Institutional Asset Management Results
Institutional Asset Management operating income decreased in the
three-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same
period in 2007. Included in the second quarter of 2007,
operating income was a gain of $398 million related to the
sale of a portion of AIGs investment in The Blackstone
Group L.P. (Blackstone) in connection with its initial public
offering. The decline also reflects lower partnership income in
the second quarter of 2008, along with lower carried interest
revenues and lower real estate related gains. AIG recognizes
carried interest revenues on an unrealized basis by reflecting
the amount owed to AIG as of the balance sheet date based on the
related funds performance. The reduction in carried
interest revenues was driven by lower unrealized carry due to
significantly higher fund performance in the three-month period
ended June 30, 2007. The decline in real estate related gains
was a function of market conditions and the timing of
93
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
proprietary real estate investment sales. Offsetting these
decreases were higher base management fees, driven by a net
increase of approximately $4.3 billion in unaffiliated
client assets under management.
Total operating income (loss) from various consolidated
warehoused investments for the three-month periods ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007 was $14 million and
$(27) million, respectively. A portion of these amounts is
offset in minority interest expense, which is not a component of
operating income (loss).
Year-to-Date
Institutional Asset Management Results
Institutional Asset Management recognized an operating loss in
the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to
operating income in the same period in 2007 reflecting lower
carried interest revenues and lower partnership income in the
2008 period, along with the effect from the sale in 2007 of a
portion of AIGs investment in Blackstone. Also
contributing to the decline in operating income were lower real
estate related gains and increased depreciation and amortization
expense due to additional real estate investments acquired in
late 2007. The reduction in carried interest revenues was driven
by lower unrealized carry due to significantly higher fund
performance in the six-month period ended June 20, 2007.
Slightly offsetting these decreases were higher base management
fees driven by a net increase of approximately $2.6 billion in
unaffiliated client assets under management.
Total operating losses from various consolidated warehoused
investments for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008
and 2007 were $77 million and $39 million,
respectively. A portion of these amounts is offset in minority
interest expense, which is not a component of operating income
(loss).
AIGs unaffiliated client assets under management,
including retail mutual funds and institutional accounts, were
$96.4 billion at June 30, 2008, a decline of
5 percent compared to December 31, 2007 and an
increase of 5 percent compared to $92.1 billion at
June 30, 2007. The decline from December 31, 2007
primarily reflected market valuation declines in the equity and
fixed income markets. The increase from June 30, 2007 was
driven by new business.
Brokerage Services and Mutual Funds
Revenues and operating income related to Brokerage Services and
Mutual Fund activities decreased due to lower fee income as a
result of a lower asset base.
Other Asset Management Results
Revenues and operating income related to the Other Asset
Management activities decreased in the three- and six-month
periods ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same periods in
2007 due to lower income from partnership investments. Similar
to the investments held in the Spread-Based Investment business,
these investments experienced significantly higher returns in
the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2007 and
weaker market conditions in 2008.
Other Operations
The operating loss of AIGs Other category was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Three Months |
|
Six Months |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
| |
|
| |
(in millions) |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity earnings in partially
owned companies
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
91 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(452 |
) |
|
|
(302 |
) |
|
|
(820 |
) |
|
|
(554 |
) |
Unallocated corporate expenses*
|
|
|
(282 |
) |
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
|
(382 |
) |
Net realized capital gains (losses)
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(235 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
Other miscellaneous, net
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
Total Other
|
|
$ |
(715 |
) |
|
$ |
(460 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,483 |
) |
|
$ |
(930 |
) |
|
|
|
* |
Includes a charge for settlement of a dispute, expenses of
corporate staff not attributable to specific operating segments,
expenses related to efforts to improve internal controls,
corporate initiatives and certain compensation plan expenses. |
The operating loss of AIGs Other category increased in the
three-month period ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same
period in 2007 reflecting higher interest expense that resulted
from increased borrowings, including interest on the debt and
equity units from the dates of issuance in May 2008, higher
unallocated corporate expenses primarily from a charge of $101
million as a result of settlement of a dispute in connection
with the July 2008 purchase of the balance of Ascot Underwriting
Holdings, Ltd., additional charitable contribution commitments
and severance compensation for Martin Sullivan, AIGs
former Chief Executive Officer, partially offset by reversals of
previously accrued costs related to certain long-term
performance-based compensation plans, as performance to date is
below the performance thresholds set forth in those plans.
The operating loss in the six-month period ended June 30,
2008 increased compared to the same period in 2007 reflecting
higher interest expense that resulted from increased borrowings,
including interest on the debt and equity units from the dates
of issuance in May 2008, and higher net realized capital losses
and lower equity earnings in partially owned companies. The
increase in net realized capital losses in the six-month period
ended June 30, 2008 reflected higher foreign exchange
losses on foreign-denominated debt, a portion of which was
economically hedged but did not qualify for hedge accounting
treatment under FAS 133, and losses on non-hedged
derivatives. Other miscellaneous, net included a
$45 million write-off of goodwill related to Mortgage
Guaranty in the six-month period ended June 30, 2008.
94
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Capital Resources and Liquidity
At June 30, 2008, AIG had total consolidated
shareholders equity of $78.1 billion and total
consolidated borrowings of $178.6 billion. At that date,
$68.6 billion of such borrowings were subsidiary borrowings
not guaranteed by AIG.
In May 2008, AIG raised a total of approximately
$20 billion through the sale of:
|
|
|
|
|
196,710,525 shares of AIG common stock in a public offering at a
price per share of $38, for an aggregate amount of
$7.47 billion; |
|
|
|
78.4 million equity units in a public offering at a price
per unit of $75, for an aggregate amount of $5.88 billion.
The equity units consist of an ownership interest in AIG junior
subordinated debentures and a stock purchase contract obligating
the holder of an equity unit to purchase, and obligating AIG to
sell, a variable number of shares of AIG common stock on three
dates in 2011 (a minimum of 128,944,480 shares and a
maximum of 154,738,080 shares, subject to anti-dilution
adjustments); and |
|
|
|
$6.9 billion in unregistered offerings of junior
subordinated debentures in three series: $4.0 billion
8.175 percent
Series A-6 junior
subordinated debentures, EUR 750 million 8.0 percent
Series A-7 junior
subordinated debentures, and GBP 900 million
8.625 percent
Series A-8 junior
subordinated debentures. |
The equity units and junior subordinated debentures receive
hybrid equity treatment from the major rating agencies under
their current policies but are recorded as long-term borrowings
on the consolidated balance sheet.
95
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Borrowings
AIGs total borrowings were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
(in millions) |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
| |
Borrowings issued by AIG:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes and bonds payable
|
|
$ |
12,960 |
|
|
$ |
14,588 |
|
|
Junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
12,866 |
|
|
|
5,809 |
|
|
Junior subordinated debt attributable to equity units
|
|
|
5,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and mortgages payable
|
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
MIP matched notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
14,621 |
|
|
|
14,267 |
|
|
Series AIGFP matched notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
Total AIG borrowings
|
|
|
48,218 |
|
|
|
36,267 |
|
|
Borrowings guaranteed by AIG:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIGFP(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GIAs
|
|
|
18,296 |
|
|
|
19,908 |
|
|
Notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
28,304 |
|
|
|
36,676 |
|
|
Loans and mortgages payable
|
|
|
1,577 |
|
|
|
1,384 |
|
|
Hybrid financial instrument
liabilities(b)
|
|
|
5,662 |
|
|
|
7,479 |
|
|
|
Total AIGFP borrowings
|
|
|
53,839 |
|
|
|
65,447 |
|
|
AIG Funding, Inc. commercial paper
|
|
|
5,765 |
|
|
|
4,222 |
|
|
AIGLH notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
797 |
|
|
|
797 |
|
|
Liabilities connected to trust preferred stock
|
|
|
1,415 |
|
|
|
1,435 |
|
|
Total borrowings issued or guaranteed by AIG
|
|
|
110,034 |
|
|
|
108,168 |
|
|
Borrowings not guaranteed by AIG:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ILFC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
4,608 |
|
|
|
4,483 |
|
|
Junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
999 |
|
|
Notes and bonds
payable(c)
|
|
|
26,818 |
|
|
|
25,737 |
|
|
|
Total ILFC borrowings
|
|
|
32,425 |
|
|
|
31,219 |
|
|
AGF
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper and extendible commercial notes
|
|
|
3,912 |
|
|
|
3,801 |
|
|
Junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
Notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
21,204 |
|
|
|
22,369 |
|
|
|
Total AGF borrowings
|
|
|
25,465 |
|
|
|
26,519 |
|
|
AIGCFG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
Loans and mortgages payable
|
|
|
2,257 |
|
|
|
1,839 |
|
|
|
Total AIGCFG borrowings
|
|
|
2,530 |
|
|
|
2,126 |
|
|
AIG Finance Taiwan Limited commercial paper
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other subsidiaries
|
|
|
709 |
|
|
|
775 |
|
|
Borrowings of consolidated investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.I.
Credit(d)
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
AIG Investments
|
|
|
1,502 |
|
|
|
1,636 |
|
|
AIG Global Real Estate Investment
|
|
|
5,294 |
|
|
|
5,096 |
|
|
AIG SunAmerica
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
ALICO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
Total borrowings of consolidated investments
|
|
|
7,472 |
|
|
|
7,242 |
|
|
Total borrowings not guaranteed by AIG
|
|
|
68,604 |
|
|
|
67,881 |
|
|
Consolidated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial paper and extendible commercial notes
|
|
|
15,061 |
|
|
|
13,114 |
|
|
|
Total long-term borrowings
|
|
|
163,577 |
|
|
|
162,935 |
|
|
|
Total borrowings
|
|
$ |
178,638 |
|
|
$ |
176,049 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
In 2008, AIGFP borrowings are carried at fair value. |
(b) |
Represents structured notes issued by AIGFP that are
accounted for using the fair value option at 2008 and 2007. |
|
|
(c) |
Includes borrowings under Export Credit Facility of $2.6
billion and $2.5 billion at June 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively. |
|
|
(d) |
Represents commercial paper issued by a variable interest
entity secured by receivables of A.I. Credit. |
96
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
The roll forward of long-term borrowings, excluding
borrowings of consolidated investments, for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) | |
| |
|
|
Balance at | |
|
|
|
Maturities | |
|
Effect of | |
|
|
|
Balance at | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
and | |
|
Foreign | |
|
Other | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
2007 | |
|
Issuances | |
|
Repayments | |
|
Exchange | |
|
Changes(b) | |
|
2008 | |
|
AIG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes and bonds payable
|
|
$ |
14,588 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,792 |
) |
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
$ |
12,960 |
|
|
Junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
5,809 |
|
|
|
6,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,866 |
|
|
Junior subordinated debt attributable to equity units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,880 |
|
|
Loans and mortgages payable
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
893 |
|
|
MIP matched notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
14,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
14,621 |
|
|
Series AIGFP matched notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
998 |
|
|
AIGFP(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GIAs
|
|
|
19,908 |
|
|
|
2,944 |
|
|
|
(5,039 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
18,296 |
|
|
Notes and bonds payable and hybrid financial instrument
liabilities
|
|
|
44,155 |
|
|
|
33,553 |
|
|
|
(44,951 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,209 |
|
|
|
33,966 |
|
|
Loans and mortgages payable
|
|
|
1,384 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
(165 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
1,577 |
|
|
AIGLH notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
797 |
|
Liabilities connected to trust preferred stock
|
|
|
1,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1,415 |
|
ILFC notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
25,737 |
|
|
|
2,680 |
|
|
|
(1,884 |
) |
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
26,818 |
|
ILFC junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
999 |
|
AGF notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
22,369 |
|
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
(2,098 |
) |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
21,204 |
|
AGF junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349 |
|
AIGCFG loans and mortgages payable
|
|
|
1,839 |
|
|
|
1,234 |
|
|
|
(1,089 |
) |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
2,257 |
|
Other subsidiaries
|
|
|
775 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
709 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
156,014 |
|
|
$ |
54,758 |
|
|
$ |
(57,374 |
) |
|
$ |
774 |
|
|
$ |
2,433 |
|
|
$ |
156,605 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
In 2008, AIGFP borrowings are carried at fair value. |
(b) |
Includes the cumulative effect of the adoption of
FAS 159. |
AIG (Parent Company)
AIG intends to continue its customary practice of issuing debt
securities from time to time to meet its financing needs and
those of certain of its subsidiaries for general corporate
purposes, as well as to opportunistically fund the MIP. As of
June 30, 2008, approximately $7.4 billion principal
amount of senior notes were outstanding under AIGs
medium-term note program, of which $3.2 billion was used
for AIGs general corporate purposes, $1.0 billion was
used by AIGFP (referred to as Series AIGFP in
the preceding tables) and $3.2 billion was used to fund the
MIP. The maturity dates of these notes range from 2008 to 2052.
To the extent considered appropriate, AIG may enter into swap
transactions to manage its effective borrowing rates with
respect to these notes.
AIG also maintains a Euro medium-term note program under which
an aggregate nominal amount of up to $20.0 billion of
senior notes may be outstanding at any one time. As of
June 30, 2008, the equivalent of $13.1 billion of
notes were outstanding under the program, of which
$10.0 billion were used to fund the MIP and the remainder
was used for AIGs general corporate purposes. The
aggregate amount outstanding includes a $1.7 billion loss
resulting from foreign exchange translation into
U.S. dollars, of which $451 million loss relates to
notes issued by AIG for general corporate purposes and
$1.2 billion loss relates to notes issued to fund the MIP.
AIG has economically hedged the currency exposure arising from
its foreign currency denominated notes.
AIG maintains a shelf registration statement in Japan, providing
for the issuance of up to Japanese yen 300 billion
principal amount of senior notes, of which the equivalent of
$470 million was outstanding as of June 30, 2008 and
was used for AIGs general corporate purposes. AIG also
maintains an Australian dollar debt program under which senior
notes with an aggregate principal amount of up to 5 billion
Australian dollars may be outstanding at any one time. Although
as of June 30, 2008 there were no outstanding notes under
the Australian program, AIG intends to use the program
opportunistically to fund the MIP or for AIGs general
corporate purposes.
In May 2008, AIG issued $5.88 billion of junior
subordinated debentures which form part of the equity units sold
by AIG in a public offering. In addition, AIG sold a total of
$6.9 billion of junior subordinated debentures in
Rule 144A/ Regulation S offerings in three series:
$4.0 billion 8.175 percent
Series A-6 junior
subordinated debentures; EUR 750 million 8.0 percent
Series A-7 junior
subordinated debentures; and GBP 900 million
8.625 percent
Series A-8 junior
subordinated debentures. AIG may redeem the A-6 debentures
without penalty on or after May 15, 2038 and may redeem the A-7
and A-8 debentures on or after May 22,
97
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
2018 without penalty. After these dates, the debentures will
bear interest at floating rates. AIG agreed pursuant to a
replacement capital covenant that it will not repay, redeem, or
purchase the
Series A-6, A-7 or
A-8 junior subordinated debentures on or before a specified
date, unless AIG has received qualifying proceeds from the sale
of replacement capital securities. The equity units and the
Series A-6,
A-7 and
A-8 junior subordinated
debentures receive hybrid equity treatment from the major rating
agencies under their current policies but are recorded as
long-term borrowings on the consolidated balance sheet.
In October 2007, AIG borrowed a total of $500 million on an
unsecured basis pursuant to a loan agreement with a third-party
bank. The entire amount of the loan remained outstanding at
June 30, 2008 and will mature in October 2008.
AIGFP
AIGFP uses the proceeds from the issuance of notes and bonds and
GIA borrowings, as well as the issuance of Series AIGFP
notes by AIG, to invest in a diversified portfolio of securities
and derivative transactions. The borrowings may also be
temporarily invested in securities purchased under agreements to
resell. AIGFPs notes and bonds include structured debt
instruments whose payment terms are linked to one or more
financial or other indices (such as an equity index or commodity
index or another measure that is not considered to be clearly
and closely related to the debt instrument). These notes contain
embedded derivatives that otherwise would be required to be
accounted for separately under FAS 133. Upon AIGs
adoption of FAS 155 in 2006, AIGFP elected the fair value
option for these notes. The notes that are accounted for using
the fair value option are reported separately under hybrid
financial instrument liabilities. AIG guarantees the obligations
of AIGFP under AIGFPs notes and bonds and GIA borrowings.
See Liquidity herein.
AIGFP has a Euro medium-term note program under which an
aggregate nominal amount of up to $20.0 billion of notes
may be outstanding at any one time. As of June 30, 2008,
$4.3 billion of notes were outstanding under the program.
The notes issued under this program are guaranteed by AIG and
are included in AIGFPs notes and bonds payable in the
table of total borrowings.
AIG Funding
AIG Funding, Inc. (AIG Funding) issues commercial paper that is
guaranteed by AIG to help fulfill the short-term cash
requirements of AIG and its subsidiaries. The level of issuances
of AIG Fundings commercial paper, including the guarantee
by AIG, is subject to the approval of AIGs Board of
Directors or the Finance Committee of the Board if it exceeds
certain pre-approved limits.
As backup for the commercial paper program and for other general
corporate purposes, AIG and AIG Funding maintain revolving
credit facilities, which, as of June 30, 2008, had an
aggregate of $9.2 billion available to be drawn and which
are summarized below under Revolving Credit Facilities. In July
2008, AIG and AIG Funding renewed their 364-day syndicated
revolving credit facility.
ILFC
ILFC fulfills its short-term cash requirements through operating
cash flows and the issuance of commercial paper. The issuance of
commercial paper is subject to the approval of ILFCs Board
of Directors and is not guaranteed by AIG. ILFC maintains
syndicated revolving credit facilities which, as of
June 30, 2008, totaled $6.5 billion and which are
summarized below under Revolving Credit Facilities. These
facilities are used as back up for ILFCs maturing debt and
other obligations.
As a well-known seasoned issuer, ILFC has filed an automatic
shelf registration statement with the SEC allowing ILFC
immediate access to the U.S. public debt markets. At
June 30, 2008, $6.8 billion of debt securities had
been issued under this registration statement and
$6.1 billion had been issued under a prior registration
statement. In addition, ILFC has a Euro medium-term note program
for $7.0 billion, under which $3.8 billion in notes
were outstanding at June 30, 2008. Notes issued under the
Euro medium-term note program are included in ILFC notes and
bonds payable in the preceding table of borrowings. The
cumulative foreign exchange adjustment loss for the foreign
currency denominated debt was $1.3 billion at June 30,
2008 and $969 million at December 31, 2007. ILFC has
substantially eliminated the currency exposure arising from
foreign currency denominated notes by economically hedging the
note exposure.
ILFC had a $4.3 billion Export Credit Facility for use in
connection with the purchase of approximately 75 aircraft
delivered through 2001. This facility was guaranteed by various
European Export Credit Agencies. The interest rate varies from
5.75 percent to 5.90 percent on these amortizing
ten-year borrowings depending on the delivery date of the
aircraft. At June 30, 2008, ILFC had $504 million
outstanding under this facility. The debt is collateralized by a
pledge of the shares of a subsidiary of ILFC, which holds title
to the aircraft financed under the facility.
In May 2004, ILFC entered into a similarly structured Export
Credit Facility for up to a maximum of $2.6 billion for
Airbus aircraft to be delivered through May 31, 2005. The
facility was subsequently increased to $3.6 billion and
extended to include aircraft to be delivered through
May 31, 2009. The facility becomes available as the various
European Export Credit Agencies provide their guarantees for
aircraft based on a six-month forward-looking calendar, and the
interest rate is determined through a bid process. The interest
rates are either LIBOR based with spreads ranging from
98
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
0.01 percent to 0.28 percent or at fixed rates ranging
from 4.2 percent to 4.7 percent. At June 30,
2008, ILFC had $2.1 billion outstanding under this
facility. The debt is collateralized by a pledge of shares of a
subsidiary of ILFC, which holds title to the aircraft financed
under the facility. Borrowings with respect to these facilities
are included in ILFCs notes and bonds payable in the
preceding table of borrowings.
From time to time, ILFC enters into funded financing agreements.
As of June 30, 2008, ILFC had a total of $1.1 billion
outstanding, which has varying maturities through February 2012.
The interest rates are LIBOR-based, with spreads ranging from
0.30 percent to 1.625 percent.
The proceeds of ILFCs debt financing are primarily used to
purchase flight equipment, including progress payments during
the construction phase. The primary sources for the repayment of
this debt and the interest expense thereon are the cash flow
from operations, proceeds from the sale of flight equipment and
the rollover and refinancing of the prior debt. AIG does not
guarantee the debt obligations of ILFC. See also Liquidity
herein.
AGF
AGF fulfills most of its short-term cash borrowing requirements
through the issuance of commercial paper. The issuance of
commercial paper is subject to the approval of AGFs Board
of Directors and is not guaranteed by AIG. AGF maintains
committed syndicated revolving credit facilities which, as of
June 30, 2008, totaled $4.8 billion and which are
summarized below under Revolving Credit Facilities. The
facilities can be used for general corporate purposes and to
provide backup for AGFs commercial paper programs. In July
2008, AGF renewed its expiring $2.625 billion 364-day
revolving credit facility and decreased the amount to
$2.45 billion.
As of June 30, 2008, notes and bonds aggregating
$21.2 billion were outstanding with maturity dates ranging
from 2008 to 2031 at interest rates ranging from
2.13 percent to 8.45 percent. To the extent considered
appropriate, AGF may enter into swap transactions to manage its
effective borrowing rates with respect to these notes and bonds.
As a well-known seasoned issuer, AGF has an automatic shelf
registration statement on file with the SEC that permits AGF
immediate access to the U.S. public debt markets.
AGFs funding sources include an SEC-registered medium-term
note program, private placement debt, retail note issuances,
bank financing and securitizations of finance receivables that
AGF accounts for as on-balance-sheet secured financings. In
addition, AGF has become a recognized issuer of long-term debt
in the international capital markets and has established a
$5.0 billion Euro medium-term note program. There are
currently no outstanding notes under AGFs Euro program.
In addition to debt refinancing activities, proceeds from the
collection of finance receivables are used to fund cash needs
including the payment of principal and interest on AGFs
debt. AIG does not guarantee any of the debt obligations of AGF.
See also Liquidity herein.
AIGCFG
AIGCFG has a variety of funding mechanisms for its various
markets, including retail and wholesale deposits, short-and
long-term bank loans, securitizations and intercompany
subordinated debt. AIG Credit Card Company (Taiwan), a consumer
finance business in Taiwan, and AIG Retail Bank PLC, a full
service consumer bank in Thailand, have issued commercial paper
for the funding of their respective operations. AIG does not
guarantee any borrowings for AIGCFG businesses, including this
commercial paper.
Revolving Credit Facilities
AIG, ILFC and AGF maintain committed, unsecured revolving credit
facilities listed on the following table in order to support
their respective commercial paper programs and for general
corporate purposes. AIG, ILFC and AGF expect to replace or
extend these credit facilities on or prior to their expiration.
Some of the facilities, as noted below, contain
a term-out option allowing for the conversion
by the borrower of any outstanding loans at expiration into
one-year term loans.
99
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
As of June 30, 2008 (in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-Year | |
|
|
Available | |
|
|
|
Term-Out | |
Facility |
|
Size | |
|
Borrower(s) |
|
Amount | |
|
Expiration |
|
Option | |
|
AIG:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
364-Day Syndicated Facility
|
|
$ |
2,125 |
|
|
AIG/AIG
Funding(a)
AIG Capital
Corporation(a) |
|
$ |
2,125 |
|
|
|
July 2008 (b) |
|
|
|
Yes |
|
|
5-Year Syndicated Facility
|
|
|
1,625 |
|
|
AIG/AIG
Funding(a)
AIG Capital
Corporation(a) |
|
|
1,625 |
|
|
|
July 2011 |
|
|
|
No |
|
|
364-Day Bilateral Facility
(c)
|
|
|
3,200 |
|
|
AIG/AIG Funding |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
December 2008 |
|
|
|
Yes |
|
|
364-Day Intercompany
Facility(d)
|
|
|
5,335 |
|
|
AIG |
|
|
5,335 |
|
|
|
September 2008 |
|
|
|
Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total AIG
|
|
$ |
12,285 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ILFC:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5-Year Syndicated Facility
|
|
$ |
2,500 |
|
|
ILFC |
|
$ |
2,500 |
|
|
|
October 2011 |
|
|
|
No |
|
|
5-Year Syndicated Facility
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
ILFC |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
October 2010 |
|
|
|
No |
|
|
5-Year Syndicated Facility
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
ILFC |
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
October 2009 |
|
|
|
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ILFC
|
|
$ |
6,500 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AGF:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
364-Day Syndicated Facility
|
|
$ |
2,625 |
|
|
American General Finance Corporation
American General Finance,
Inc.(e) |
|
$ |
2,625 |
|
|
|
July 2008 (f) |
|
|
|
Yes |
|
|
5-Year Syndicated Facility
|
|
|
2,125 |
|
|
American General Finance Corporation |
|
|
2,125 |
|
|
|
July 2010 |
|
|
|
No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total AGF
|
|
$ |
4,750 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
In July 2008, this facility was resyndicated at the same
aggregate amount and the expiration was extended to July
2009. |
|
|
(c) |
This facility can be drawn in the form of loans or letters of
credit. All drawn amounts shown above are in the form of letters
of credit. |
|
|
(d) |
Subsidiaries of AIG are the lenders on this facility. |
|
|
(e) |
American General Finance, Inc. is an eligible borrower for up
to $400 million only. |
(f) |
In July 2008, this facility was resyndicated at an aggregate
amount of $2.45 billion and the expiration was extended to
July 2009. |
Credit Ratings
The cost and availability of unsecured financing for AIG and its
subsidiaries are generally dependent on their short-and
long-term debt ratings. The following table presents the credit
ratings of AIG and certain of its subsidiaries as of
July 31, 2008. In parentheses, following the initial
occurrence in the table of each rating, is an indication of that
ratings relative rank within the agencys rating
categories. That ranking refers only to the generic or major
rating category and not to the modifiers appended to the rating
by the rating agencies to denote relative position within such
generic or major category.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term Debt |
|
Senior Long-term Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moodys |
|
S&P |
|
Fitch |
|
Moodys(a) |
|
S&P(b) |
|
Fitch(c) |
|
AIG
|
|
P-1 (1st of 3) |
|
A-1+ (1st of 6) |
|
F1+ (1st of 5) |
|
Aa3 (2nd of 9)
(e) |
|
AA- (2nd of 8)
(f) |
|
AA- (2nd of 9)
(g) |
AIG Financial Products
Corp.(d)
|
|
P-1 |
|
A-1+ |
|
|
|
Aa3(e) |
|
AA-(f) |
|
|
AIG Funding, Inc.
(d)
|
|
P-1 |
|
A-1+ |
|
F1+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ILFC
|
|
P-1 |
|
A-1 (1st of 6) |
|
F1 (1st of 5) |
|
A1 (3rd of 9)
(e) |
|
A+ (3rd of 8)
(f) |
|
A (3rd of 9) |
American General Finance Corporation
|
|
P-1 |
|
A-1 |
|
F1 |
|
A1(e) |
|
A+(f) |
|
A |
American General Finance, Inc.
|
|
P-1 |
|
A-1 |
|
F1 |
|
|
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
(a) |
Moodys appends numerical modifiers 1, 2 and 3 to
the generic rating categories to show relative position within
rating categories. |
(b) |
S&P ratings may be modified by the addition of a plus or
minus sign to show relative standing within the major rating
categories. |
(c) |
Fitch Ratings (Fitch) ratings may be modified by the addition
of a plus or minus sign to show relative standing within the
major rating categories. |
(d) |
AIG guarantees all obligations of AIG Financial Products
Corp. and AIG Funding, Inc. |
(e) |
Negative outlook. A negative outlook by Moodys
indicates that a rating may be lowered but is not necessarily a
precursor of a ratings change. |
(f) |
Negative outlook on Counterparty Credit Ratings or Corporate
Credit Ratings. A negative outlook by S&P indicates that a
rating may be lowered but is not necessarily a precursor of a
ratings change. |
(g) |
Negative outlook on Issuer Default and Senior Unsecured Debt
Ratings. A negative outlook by Fitch indicates that a rating may
be lowered but is not necessarily a precursor of a ratings
change. |
These credit ratings are current opinions of the rating
agencies. As such, they may be changed, suspended or withdrawn
at any time by the rating agencies as a result of changes in, or
unavailability of, information or based on other circumstances.
Ratings may also be withdrawn at AIG managements request.
This discussion of ratings is not a complete list of ratings of
AIG and its subsidiaries.
Ratings triggers have been defined by one
independent rating agency to include clauses or agreements the
outcome of which depends upon the level of ratings maintained by
one or
100
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
more rating agencies. Ratings triggers generally
relate to events that (i) could result in the termination
or limitation of credit availability, or require accelerated
repayment, (ii) could result in the termination of business
contracts or (iii) could require a company to post
collateral for the benefit of counterparties.
A significant portion of AIGFPs GIAs and financial
derivative transactions include provisions that require AIGFP,
upon a downgrade of AIGs long-term debt ratings, to post
collateral or, with the consent of the counterparties, assign or
repay its positions or arrange a substitute guarantee of its
obligations by an obligor with higher debt ratings.
It is estimated that, as of the close of business on
July 31, 2008, based on AIGFPs outstanding municipal
GIAs and financial derivative transactions at that date, a
downgrade of AIGs long-term senior debt ratings to
A1 by Moodys and A+ by S&P
would permit counterparties to make additional calls for up to
approximately $13.3 billion of collateral, while a
downgrade to A2 by Moodys and A by
S&P would permit counterparties to call for approximately
$1.2 billion of additional collateral. If either of
Moodys or S&P downgraded AIGs ratings to
A1 or A+, respectively, the estimated
collateral call would be for up to approximately
$10.5 billion, while a downgrade to A2 or
A, respectively, by either of the two rating
agencies would permit counterparties to call for up to
approximately $1.1 billion of additional collateral.
Furthermore, a downgrade of AIGs long-term senior debt
ratings to A1 by Moodys or to the same levels
by both rating agencies would permit either AIG or the
counterparties to elect early termination of contracts resulting
in payments of up to approximately $4.6 billion, while a
downgrade to A2 by Moodys and A by
S&P would permit either AIG or the counterparties to elect
early termination of additional contracts resulting in
additional payments of up to approximately $800 million.
AIGFP believes that it is unlikely that certain of these
counterparties would exercise their rights to elect termination
of their contracts given the substantial economic benefit that
such counterparties would forfeit upon termination.
The actual amount of collateral that AIGFP would be required to
post to counterparties in the event of such downgrades, or the
aggregate amount of payments that AIG could be required to make,
depends on market conditions, the fair value of outstanding
affected transactions and other factors prevailing at the time
of the downgrade. Additional obligations to post collateral or
the costs of assignment, repayment or alternative credit support
would increase the demands on AIGs liquidity. Further
downgrades could result in requirements for substantial
additional collateral, which could have a material adverse
effect on AIGs liquidity.
Contractual Obligations
Contractual obligations in total, and by remaining maturity
at June 30, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Payments due by Period | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Total | |
|
Less Than | |
|
1-3 | |
|
3+-5 | |
|
Over Five | |
(in millions) |
|
Payments | |
|
One Year | |
|
Years | |
|
Years | |
|
Years | |
|
Borrowings(a)
|
|
$ |
156,605 |
|
|
$ |
34,019 |
|
|
$ |
33,408 |
|
|
$ |
25,983 |
|
|
$ |
63,195 |
|
Interest payments on borrowings
|
|
|
78,502 |
|
|
|
5,930 |
|
|
|
11,136 |
|
|
|
9,477 |
|
|
|
51,959 |
|
Loss
reserves(b)
|
|
|
88,747 |
|
|
|
24,405 |
|
|
|
27,068 |
|
|
|
12,869 |
|
|
|
24,405 |
|
Insurance and investment contract
liabilities(c)
|
|
|
706,108 |
|
|
|
31,947 |
|
|
|
43,609 |
|
|
|
41,707 |
|
|
|
588,845 |
|
GIC
liabilities(d)
|
|
|
25,458 |
|
|
|
11,011 |
|
|
|
4,766 |
|
|
|
2,421 |
|
|
|
7,260 |
|
Aircraft purchase commitments
|
|
|
17,566 |
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
|
|
3,206 |
|
|
|
3,295 |
|
|
|
10,047 |
|
Other long-term obligations
|
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total(e)(f)
|
|
$ |
1,073,595 |
|
|
$ |
108,551 |
|
|
$ |
123,554 |
|
|
$ |
95,779 |
|
|
$ |
745,711 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Excludes commercial paper and borrowings incurred by
consolidated investments and includes hybrid financial
instrument liabilities recorded at fair value. |
(b) |
Represents future loss and loss adjustment expense payments
estimated based on historical loss development payment patterns.
Due to the significance of the assumptions used, the periodic
amounts presented could be materially different from actual
required payments. |
(c) |
Insurance and investment contract liabilities include various
investment-type products with contractually scheduled
maturities, including periodic payments of a term certain
nature. Insurance and investment contract liabilities also
include benefit and claim liabilities, of which a significant
portion represents policies and contracts that do not have
stated contractual maturity dates and may not result in any
future payment obligations. For these policies and contracts
(i) AIG is currently not making payments until the
occurrence of an insurable event, such as death or disability,
(ii) payments are conditional on survivorship, or
(iii) payment may occur due to a surrender or other
non-scheduled event out of AIGs control. AIG has made
significant assumptions to determine the estimated undiscounted
cash flows of these contractual policy benefits, which
assumptions include mortality, morbidity, future lapse rates,
expenses, investment returns and interest crediting rates,
offset by expected future deposits and premiums on in force
policies. Due to the significance of the assumptions used, the
periodic amounts presented could be materially different from
actual required payments. The amounts presented in this table
are undiscounted and therefore exceed the future policy benefits
and policyholders contract deposits included in the
balance sheet. |
(d) |
Represents guaranteed maturities under GICs. |
(e) |
Does not reflect unrecognized tax benefits of $2.5 billion,
the timing of which is uncertain. |
101
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
(f) |
The majority of AIGFPs credit default swaps require
AIGFP to provide credit protection on a designated portfolio of
loans or debt securities. At June 30, 2008, AIG had
recorded $26.1 billion of cumulative unrealized market
valuation losses in its financial statements relating to
AIGFPs super senior credit default swap portfolio, net of
amounts realized in extinguishing derivative obligations.
However, AIGs credit-based stress testing scenarios
illustrate potential pre-tax realized credit losses from these
contracts at approximately $5.0 billion and approximately
$8.5 billion at that date. Due to the long-term maturities
of these credit default swaps, AIG is unable to make reasonable
estimates of the periods during which any payments would be
made. |
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements and Commercial
Commitments
Off balance sheet arrangements and commercial commitments in
total, and by remaining maturity at June 30, 2008 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Amount of Commitment Expiration |
|
|
Total | |
|
| |
|
|
Amounts | |
|
Less Than | |
|
1-3 | |
|
3+-5 | |
|
Over Five | |
(in millions) |
|
Committed | |
|
One Year | |
|
Years | |
|
Years | |
|
Years | |
|
Guarantees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity
facilities(a)
|
|
$ |
2,552 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
884 |
|
|
$ |
1,325 |
|
|
$ |
271 |
|
|
Standby letters of credit
|
|
|
1,702 |
|
|
|
1,481 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
Construction
guarantees(b)
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
Guarantees of indebtedness
|
|
|
1,284 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
All other guarantees
|
|
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
753 |
|
Commitments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
commitments(c)
|
|
|
8,711 |
|
|
|
3,304 |
|
|
|
3,619 |
|
|
|
1,605 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
Commitments to extend credit
|
|
|
1,828 |
|
|
|
1,352 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of credit
|
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
Maturity shortening
puts(d)
|
|
|
7,995 |
|
|
|
2,071 |
|
|
|
2,595 |
|
|
|
1,648 |
|
|
|
1,681 |
|
|
Other commercial
commitments(e)
|
|
|
1,193 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
1,008 |
|
|
Total(f)
|
|
$ |
27,974 |
|
|
$ |
9,504 |
|
|
$ |
7,961 |
|
|
$ |
5,326 |
|
|
$ |
5,183 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Primarily liquidity facilities provided in connection with
certain municipal swap transactions and collateralized bond
obligations. |
(b) |
Primarily AIG SunAmerica construction guarantees connected to
affordable housing investments. |
(c) |
Includes commitments to invest in limited partnerships,
private equity, hedge funds and mutual funds and commitments to
purchase and develop real estate in the United States and
abroad. |
|
|
(d) |
Represents obligations under
2a-7 Puts to purchase
certain multi-sector CDOs at pre-determined contractual
prices. |
(e) |
Includes options to acquire aircraft. Excludes commitments
with respect to pension plans. The annual pension contribution
for 2008 is expected to be approximately $118 million for
U.S. and non-U.S.
plans. |
Arrangements with Variable Interest Entities and
Structured Investment Vehicles
AIG enters into various off-balance-sheet (unconsolidated)
arrangements with variable interest entities (VIEs) in the
normal course of business. AIGs involvement with VIEs
ranges from being a passive investor to designing and
structuring, warehousing and managing the collateral of VIEs.
AIG engages in transactions with VIEs as part of its investment
activities to obtain funding and to facilitate client needs. AIG
purchases debt securities (rated and unrated) and equity
interests issued by VIEs, makes loans and provides other credit
support to VIEs, enters into insurance, reinsurance and
derivative transactions and leasing arrangements with VIEs, and
acts as the warehouse agent and collateral manager for VIEs.
Interest holders in the VIEs generally have recourse only to the
assets and cash flows of the VIEs and do not have recourse to
AIG, except when AIG has provided a guarantee to the VIEs
interest holders.
Under FIN 46(R), AIG consolidates a VIE when it is the
primary beneficiary of the entity. The primary beneficiary is
the party that either (i) absorbs a majority of the
VIEs expected losses; (ii) receives a majority of the
VIEs expected residual returns; or (iii) both. For a
further discussion of AIGs involvement with VIEs, see
Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the
2007 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
A significant portion of AIGs overall exposure to VIEs
results from AIG Investments real estate and investment
funds.
In certain instances, AIG Investments acts as the collateral
manager or general partner of an investment fund, private equity
fund or hedge fund. Such entities are typically registered
investment companies or qualify for the specialized investment
company accounting in accordance with the AICPA Investment
Company Audit and Accounting Guide. For investment partnerships,
hedge funds and private equity funds, AIG acts as the general
partner or manager of the fund and is responsible for carrying
out the investment mandate of the VIE. Often, AIGs
insurance operations participate in these AIG managed structures
as a passive investor in the
102
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
debt or equity issued by the VIE. Typically, AIG does not
provide any guarantees to the investors in the VIE.
During 2008, AIG reduced its maximum exposure to loss from its
involvement with unconsolidated VIEs by approximately
$6.6 billion, primarily as a result of the termination of
certain of AIGFPs transactions. Substantially all of
AIGs exposure to these unconsolidated VIEs is represented
by its equity investment in them, and such investment is
reflected on the consolidated balance sheet.
Shareholders Equity
The changes in AIGs consolidated shareholders
equity were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
June 30, | |
(in millions) |
|
2008 | |
| |
Beginning of year
|
|
|
$95,801 |
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(13,162 |
) |
|
Unrealized (depreciation) appreciation of investments, net
of tax
|
|
|
(9,441 |
) |
|
Cumulative translation adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
984 |
|
|
Dividends to shareholders
|
|
|
(1,121 |
) |
|
Payments advanced to purchase shares, net
|
|
|
912 |
|
|
New share issuance
|
|
|
7,343 |
|
|
Share purchases
|
|
|
(1,912 |
) |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting changes, net of tax
|
|
|
(1,108 |
) |
|
Other*
|
|
|
(208 |
) |
|
End of period
|
|
|
$78,088 |
|
|
|
|
* |
Reflects the effects of employee stock transactions and the
present value of future contract adjustment payments related to
the issuance of equity units. |
New Share Issuance
In May 2008, AIG sold in a public offering 196,710,525 shares of
its common stock at a price per share of $38. Concurrent with
the common stock offering, AIG sold 78.4 million equity
units at a price per unit of $75. The equity units consist of an
ownership interest in AIG junior subordinated debentures and a
stock purchase contract obligating the holder of an equity unit
to purchase, and obligating AIG to sell, on each of
February 15, 2011, May 1, 2011 and August 1,
2011, for a price of $25, a variable number of shares of AIG
common stock, that is not less than 0.54823 shares and not more
than 0.6579 shares, subject to anti-dilution adjustments.
Accordingly, a maximum number of 154,738,080 shares and a
minimum number of 128,944,480 shares of AIG common stock will be
issued in the year 2011 under the stock purchase contracts,
subject to anti-dilution adjustments.
In February 2007, AIGs Board of Directors adopted a new
dividend policy, which took effect with the dividend declared in
the second quarter of 2007, providing that under ordinary
circumstances, AIGs plan will be to increase its common
stock dividend by approximately 20 percent annually. The
payment of any dividend, however, is at the discretion of
AIGs Board of Directors, and the future payment of
dividends will depend on various factors, including the
performance of AIGs businesses, AIGs consolidated
financial condition, results of operations and liquidity and the
existence of investment opportunities. With due consideration of
the foregoing policy, in light of then current market
conditions, on May 7, 2008, AIGs Board of Directors
declared a quarterly cash dividend on the common stock of
$0.22 per share, payable on September 19, 2008 to
shareholders of record on September 5, 2008, representing a
10 percent increase. No assurance can be given under
current market conditions that the Board of Directors will
further increase AIGs dividend or maintain the dividend at
current levels.
Share Repurchases
From time to time, AIG may buy shares of its common stock for
general corporate purposes, including to satisfy its obligations
under various employee benefit plans. In February 2007,
AIGs Board of Directors increased AIGs share
repurchase program by authorizing the purchase of shares with an
aggregate purchase price of $8 billion. In November 2007,
AIGs Board of Directors authorized the purchase of an
additional $8 billion in common stock. In 2007, AIG entered
into structured share repurchase arrangements providing for the
purchase of shares over time with an aggregate purchase price of
$7 billion.
A total of 37,926,059 shares were purchased during the
six-month period ended June 30, 2008 to meet commitments
that existed at December 31, 2007. All shares purchased are
recorded as treasury stock at cost.
At August 5, 2008, $9 billion was available for
purchases under the aggregate authorization. AIG does not expect
to purchase additional shares under its share repurchase program
for the foreseeable future.
Liquidity
AIG manages liquidity at both the subsidiary and parent company
levels. At June 30, 2008, AIGs consolidated invested
assets included $82.2 billion in cash and short-term
investments (including $10.4 billion of securities lending
cash and short-term investments). Consolidated net cash provided
from operating activities in the six-month period ended
June 30, 2008 amounted to $16.6 billion. At both the
subsidiary and parent company level, liquidity management
activities are intended to preserve and enhance funding
stability, flexibility, and diversity through a wide range of
potential operating environments and market conditions.
AIGs primary sources of cash flow are dividends and other
payments from its regulated and unregulated subsidiaries, as
well as issuances of debt and equity securities. Primary uses of
cash flow are for debt service, subsidiary funding,
103
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
shareholder dividend payments and common stock repurchases.
Management believes that AIGs liquid assets, cash provided
by operations and access to the capital markets will enable it
to meet its anticipated cash requirements.
AIG (Parent Company)
The liquidity of the parent company is principally derived from
its subsidiaries. The primary sources of cash flow are dividends
and other payments from its regulated and unregulated
subsidiaries, as well as issuance of debt securities. Primary
uses of cash flow are for debt service, subsidiary funding,
shareholder dividend payments and common stock repurchases. In
the six-month period ended June 30, 2008, AIG parent
collected $1.4 billion in dividends and other payments from
subsidiaries (primarily from insurance company subsidiaries).
Excluding MIP and Series AIGFP debt, AIG parent made
interest payments totaling $522 million, made
$2.4 billion in net capital contributions to subsidiaries,
and paid $1.1 billion in dividends to shareholders in the
six-month period ended June 30, 2008.
AIG parent funds its short-term working capital needs through
commercial paper issued by AIG Funding. As of June 30,
2008, AIG Funding had $5.8 billion of commercial paper
outstanding with an average maturity of 33 days. As
additional liquidity, AIG parent and AIG Funding maintain
committed revolving credit facilities that, as of June 30,
2008, had an aggregate of $9.2 billion available to be
drawn, and which are summarized above under Revolving Credit
Facilities.
104
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Invested Assets
The following tables summarize the composition of AIGs
invested assets by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance & | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General | |
|
Retirement | |
|
Financial | |
|
Asset | |
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Insurance | |
|
Services | |
|
Services | |
|
Management | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds available for sale, at fair value
|
|
$ |
72,981 |
|
|
$ |
297,095 |
|
|
$ |
1,370 |
|
|
$ |
21,870 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
393,316 |
|
|
Bonds held to maturity, at amortized cost
|
|
|
21,346 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,632 |
|
|
Bond trading securities, at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,801 |
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stocks available for sale, at fair value
|
|
|
4,522 |
|
|
|
12,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
17,306 |
|
|
Common and preferred stocks trading, at fair value
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
22,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,514 |
|
|
Preferred stocks available for sale, at fair value
|
|
|
1,943 |
|
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,496 |
|
Mortgage and other loans receivable, net of allowance
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
26,010 |
|
|
|
1,038 |
|
|
|
7,275 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
34,384 |
|
Financial Services assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flight equipment primarily under operating leases, net of
accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,887 |
|
|
Securities available for sale, at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,205 |
|
|
Trading securities, at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,170 |
|
|
Spot commodities, at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
Unrealized gain on swaps, options and forward transactions, at
fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,172 |
) |
|
|
11,548 |
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,294 |
|
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell, at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,597 |
|
|
Finance receivables, net of allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
33,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,311 |
|
Securities lending invested collateral, at fair value
|
|
|
4,951 |
|
|
|
48,312 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
6,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,530 |
|
Other invested assets
|
|
|
12,616 |
|
|
|
20,810 |
|
|
|
3,670 |
|
|
|
17,840 |
|
|
|
7,093 |
|
|
|
62,029 |
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
9,967 |
|
|
|
32,724 |
|
|
|
3,974 |
|
|
|
7,125 |
|
|
|
15,702 |
|
|
|
69,492 |
|
|
Total Investments and Financial Services assets as shown on the
balance sheet
|
|
|
128,627 |
|
|
|
468,482 |
|
|
|
155,472 |
|
|
|
61,374 |
|
|
|
21,647 |
|
|
|
835,602 |
|
Cash
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
979 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2,229 |
|
Investment income due and accrued
|
|
|
1,380 |
|
|
|
4,952 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
6,614 |
|
Real estate, net of accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
965 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
1,654 |
|
|
Total invested assets*
|
|
$ |
130,848 |
|
|
$ |
475,378 |
|
|
$ |
156,005 |
|
|
$ |
61,993 |
|
|
$ |
21,875 |
|
|
$ |
846,099 |
|
|
* At June 30, 2008, approximately 63 percent and 37
percent of invested assets were held in domestic and foreign
investments, respectively.
105
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Life | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance & | |
|
|
|
|
General | |
|
Retirement | |
|
Financial | |
|
Asset | |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Insurance | |
|
Services | |
|
Services | |
|
Management | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds available for sale, at fair value
|
|
$ |
74,057 |
|
|
|
$294,162 |
|
|
$ |
1,400 |
|
|
$ |
27,753 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
397,372 |
|
|
Bonds held to maturity, at amortized cost
|
|
|
21,355 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,581 |
|
|
Bond trading securities, at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,982 |
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stocks available for sale, at fair value
|
|
|
5,599 |
|
|
|
11,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
17,900 |
|
|
Common and preferred stocks trading, at fair value
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
21,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,376 |
|
|
Preferred stocks available for sale, at fair value
|
|
|
1,885 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,370 |
|
Mortgage and other loans receivable, net of allowance
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
24,851 |
|
|
|
1,365 |
|
|
|
7,442 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
33,727 |
|
Financial Services assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flight equipment primarily under operating leases, net of
accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,984 |
|
|
Securities available for sale, at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,305 |
|
|
Trading securities, at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,197 |
|
|
Spot commodities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
Unrealized gain on swaps, options and forward transactions, at
fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(692 |
) |
|
|
12,318 |
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell, at contract
value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,950 |
|
|
Finance receivables, net of allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
31,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,234 |
|
Securities lending invested collateral, at fair value
|
|
|
5,031 |
|
|
|
57,471 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
13,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,662 |
|
Other invested assets
|
|
|
11,895 |
|
|
|
19,015 |
|
|
|
3,663 |
|
|
|
17,261 |
|
|
|
6,989 |
|
|
|
58,823 |
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
7,356 |
|
|
|
25,236 |
|
|
|
12,249 |
|
|
|
4,919 |
|
|
|
1,591 |
|
|
|
51,351 |
|
|
Total Investments and Financial Services assets as shown on the
balance sheet
|
|
|
127,512 |
|
|
|
463,808 |
|
|
|
171,418 |
|
|
|
71,284 |
|
|
|
8,020 |
|
|
|
842,042 |
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
2,284 |
|
Investment income due and accrued
|
|
|
1,431 |
|
|
|
4,728 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
6,587 |
|
Real estate, net of accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
976 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
1,662 |
|
|
Total invested assets*
|
|
$ |
129,789 |
|
|
|
$470,512 |
|
|
$ |
171,853 |
|
|
$ |
72,043 |
|
|
$ |
8,378 |
|
|
$ |
852,575 |
|
|
|
|
* |
At December 31, 2007, approximately 65 percent and
35 percent of invested assets were held in domestic and
foreign investments, respectively. |
Investment Strategy
AIGs investment strategies are tailored to the specific
business needs of each operating unit. The investment objectives
are driven by the business model for each of the businesses:
General Insurance, Life Insurance, Retirement Services and Asset
Managements Spread-Based Investment business. The primary
objectives are liquidity, preservation of capital, growth of
surplus and generation of investment income to support the
insurance products. At the local operating unit level, the
strategies are based on considerations that include the local
market, liability duration and cash flow characteristics, rating
agency and regulatory capital considerations, legal investment
limitations, tax optimization and diversification. In addition
to local risk management considerations, AIGs corporate
risk management guidelines impose limitations on concentrations
to promote diversification by industry, asset class and
geographic sector.
The majority of assets backing insurance liabilities at AIG
consist of intermediate and long duration fixed maturity
securities. In the case of Life Insurance & Retirement
Services companies, as well as in the GIC and MIP portfolios of
the Asset Management segment, the fundamental investment
strategy is, as near as is practicable, to match the duration
characteristics of the liabilities with comparable duration
assets. Fixed maturity securities held by the insurance
companies included in the AIG Property Casualty Group consist
primarily of laddered holdings of tax-exempt municipal bonds,
which provide attractive after-tax return, limited credit risk
and generally good liquidity. Fixed maturity securities held by
Foreign General Insurance companies consist primarily of
intermediate duration high grade securities.
The market price of fixed maturity securities reflects numerous
components, including interest rate environment, credit spread,
embedded optionality (such as call features), liquidity,
structural complexity, foreign exchange risk, and other credit
and non-credit factors. However, in most circumstances, pricing
is most sensitive to interest rates, such that the market price
declines as interest rates rise, and
106
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
increases as interest rates fall. This effect is more pronounced
for longer duration securities.
AIG marks to market the vast majority of the invested assets
held by its insurance companies pursuant to FAS 115,
Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity
Securities, and related accounting pronouncements.
However, with limited exceptions (primarily with respect to
separate account products consolidated on AIGs balance
sheet pursuant to
SOP 03-01), AIG
does not mark to market its insurance liabilities for changes in
interest rates, even though rising interest rates have the
effect of reducing the fair value of such liabilities, and
falling interest rates have the opposite effect. This results in
the recording of changes in unrealized gains (losses) on
securities in Accumulated other comprehensive income resulting
from changes in interest rates without any correlative, inverse
changes in gains (losses) on AIGs liabilities. Because
AIGs asset duration in certain low-yield currencies,
particularly Japan and Taiwan, is shorter than its liability
duration, AIG views increasing interest rates in these countries
as economically advantageous, notwithstanding the effect that
higher rates have on the market value of its fixed maturity
portfolio.
The majority of AIGs non-floating rate fixed maturity
portfolio is held to support intermediate and long duration
liabilities. Assuming no other changes in factors affecting the
valuation of fixed maturity securities, each 10 basis point
(1/10 of 1 percent) increase in interest rates results in a
decline of approximately $2.4 billion in the pre-tax fair
value of the fixed maturity portfolio. In most jurisdictions in
which AIG operates, including the United States, such interest
rate related changes in portfolio value are ignored for purposes
of measuring regulatory capital adequacy.
The amortized cost or cost and fair value of AIGs
available for sale and held to maturity securities were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 | |
|
December 31, 2007 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Amortized | |
|
Gross | |
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
Amortized | |
|
Gross | |
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
|
Cost or | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair | |
|
Cost or | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair | |
(in millions) |
|
Cost | |
|
Gains | |
|
Losses | |
|
Value | |
|
Cost | |
|
Gains | |
|
Losses | |
|
Value | |
|
Bonds available for
sale:(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and government sponsored entities
|
|
$ |
4,588 |
|
|
$ |
158 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
4,712 |
|
|
$ |
7,956 |
|
|
$ |
333 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
8,252 |
|
|
Obligations of states, municipalities and political subdivisions
|
|
|
45,847 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
45,652 |
|
|
|
46,087 |
|
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
46,854 |
|
|
Non-U.S. governments
|
|
|
72,596 |
|
|
|
3,606 |
|
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
74,917 |
|
|
|
67,023 |
|
|
|
3,920 |
|
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
70,200 |
|
|
Corporate debt
|
|
|
223,902 |
|
|
|
3,693 |
|
|
|
8,247 |
|
|
|
219,348 |
|
|
|
239,822 |
|
|
|
6,216 |
|
|
|
4,518 |
|
|
|
241,520 |
|
|
Mortgage-backed, asset- backed and collateralized
|
|
|
111,678 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
13,541 |
|
|
|
98,977 |
|
|
|
140,982 |
|
|
|
1,221 |
|
|
|
7,703 |
|
|
|
134,500 |
|
|
Total bonds
|
|
$ |
458,611 |
|
|
$ |
8,762 |
|
|
$ |
23,767 |
|
|
$ |
443,606 |
|
|
$ |
501,870 |
|
|
$ |
12,617 |
|
|
$ |
13,161 |
|
|
$ |
501,326 |
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
16,086 |
|
|
|
4,332 |
|
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
19,802 |
|
|
|
15,188 |
|
|
|
5,545 |
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
20,270 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
474,697 |
|
|
$ |
13,094 |
|
|
$ |
24,383 |
|
|
$ |
463,408 |
|
|
$ |
517,058 |
|
|
$ |
18,162 |
|
|
$ |
13,624 |
|
|
$ |
521,596 |
|
|
Held to maturity:
(b)
|
|
$ |
21,632 |
|
|
$ |
322 |
|
|
$ |
145 |
|
|
$ |
21,809 |
|
|
$ |
21,581 |
|
|
$ |
609 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
22,157 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
At December 31, 2007, included AIGFP available for sale
securities with a fair value of $39.3 billion, for which
AIGFP elected the fair value option effective January 1,
2008, consisting primarily of corporate debt, mortgage-backed,
asset-backed and collateralized securities. At June 30,
2008 and December 31, 2007, fixed maturities held by AIG
that were below investment grade or not rated totaled
$23.0 billion and $27.0 billion, respectively. |
(b) |
Represents obligations of states, municipalities and
political subdivisions. |
AIGs held to maturity and available for sale fixed
maturity investments totaled $465.4 billion at
June 30, 2008, compared to $523.5 billion at
December 31, 2007. At June 30, 2008, approximately
56 percent of the fixed maturity securities were held by
domestic entities. Approximately 38 percent of such
domestic securities were rated AAA by one or more of the
principal rating agencies. Approximately five percent were below
investment grade or not rated. AIGs investment decision
process relies primarily on internally generated fundamental
analysis and internal risk ratings. Third-party rating
services ratings and opinions provide one source of
independent perspectives for consideration in the internal
analysis.
A significant portion of the foreign fixed maturity portfolio is
rated by Moodys, S&P or similar foreign rating
services. Rating services are not available in all overseas
locations. AIGs Credit Risk Committee (CRC) closely
reviews the credit quality of the foreign portfolios
non-rated fixed maturity securities. At June 30, 2008,
approximately 20 percent of the foreign fixed maturity
securities were either rated AAA or, on the basis of AIGs
internal analysis, were equivalent from a credit standpoint to
securities so rated. Approximately four percent were below
investment grade or not rated at that date. Approximately one
third of the foreign fixed maturity portfolio is sovereign fixed
maturity securities supporting the policy liabilities in the
country of issuance.
107
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
The credit ratings of AIGs fixed maturity securities,
other than those of AIGFP, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
Rating |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
| |
|
AAA
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
AA
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
A
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
Below investment grade
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Non-rated
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
The industry categories of AIGs available for sale
corporate debt securities, other than those of AIGFP, were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
Industry Category |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
| |
Financial institutions
|
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
42 |
% |
Utilities
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Communications
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Consumer noncyclical
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Capital goods
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Consumer cyclical
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Energy
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Other
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
Total*
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
* |
At both June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
approximately 95 percent of these investments were rated
investment grade. |
108
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Investments in RMBS, CMBS, CDOs and ABS
As part of its strategy to diversify its investments, AIG
invests in various types of securities, including RMBS, CMBS,
CDOs and ABS.
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains (losses) and
fair value of AIGs investments in RMBS, CMBS, CDOs and ABS
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 | |
|
December 31, 2007 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Gross | |
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross | |
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
|
Amortized | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair | |
|
Amortized | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair | |
(in millions) |
|
Cost | |
|
Gains | |
|
Losses | |
|
Value | |
|
Cost | |
|
Gains | |
|
Losses | |
|
Value | |
|
Bonds available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG, excluding AIGFP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMBS
|
|
$ |
77,531 |
|
|
$ |
506 |
|
|
$ |
10,139 |
|
|
$ |
67,898 |
|
|
$ |
89,851 |
|
|
$ |
433 |
|
|
$ |
5,504 |
|
|
$ |
84,780 |
|
|
CMBS
|
|
|
22,935 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
1,942 |
|
|
|
21,203 |
|
|
|
23,918 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
1,156 |
|
|
|
22,999 |
|
|
CDO/ ABS
|
|
|
11,212 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
1,460 |
|
|
|
9,876 |
|
|
|
10,844 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
10,447 |
|
|
Subtotal, excluding AIGFP
|
|
|
111,678 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
13,541 |
|
|
|
98,977 |
|
|
|
124,613 |
|
|
|
866 |
|
|
|
7,253 |
|
|
|
118,226 |
|
AIGFP*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,369 |
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
16,274 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
111,678 |
|
|
$ |
840 |
|
|
$ |
13,541 |
|
|
$ |
98,977 |
|
|
$ |
140,982 |
|
|
$ |
1,221 |
|
|
$ |
7,703 |
|
|
$ |
134,500 |
|
|
|
|
* |
Represents total AIGFP investments in mortgage-backed,
asset-backed and collateralized securities for which AIGFP has
elected the fair value option effective January 1, 2008. At
June 30, 2008, the fair value of these securities were
$20.3 billion. An additional $1.8 billion related to
insurance company investments is included in Bonds
trading. |
Investments in RMBS
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains (losses) and
fair value of AIGs investments in RMBS securities, other
than those of AIGFP, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 | |
|
December 31, 2007 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Gross | |
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross | |
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
|
Amortized | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair | |
|
Percent | |
|
Amortized | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair | |
|
Percent | |
(in millions) |
|
Cost | |
|
Gains | |
|
Losses | |
|
Value | |
|
of Total | |
|
Cost | |
|
Gains | |
|
Losses | |
|
Value | |
|
of Total | |
|
RMBS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. agencies
|
|
$ |
16,642 |
|
|
$ |
243 |
|
|
$ |
181 |
|
|
$ |
16,704 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
$ |
14,575 |
|
|
$ |
320 |
|
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
$ |
14,825 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
Prime non-agency
(a)
|
|
|
17,575 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
1,646 |
|
|
|
15,965 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
21,552 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
21,074 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
Alt-A
|
|
|
20,236 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
3,896 |
|
|
|
16,409 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
25,349 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
1,620 |
|
|
|
23,746 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
Other housing-
related(b)
|
|
|
3,090 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
532 |
|
|
|
2,560 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4,301 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
3,946 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
Subprime
|
|
|
19,988 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
3,884 |
|
|
|
16,260 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
24,074 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
2,907 |
|
|
|
21,189 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
77,531 |
|
|
$ |
506 |
|
|
$ |
10,139 |
|
|
$ |
67,898 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
89,851 |
|
|
$ |
433 |
|
|
$ |
5,504 |
|
|
$ |
84,780 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
(a) |
Includes foreign and jumbo RMBS-related securities. |
(b) |
Primarily wrapped second-lien. |
AIGs operations, other than AIGFP, held investments in
RMBS with an estimated fair value of $67.9 billion at
June 30, 2008, or approximately 8 percent of
AIGs total invested assets. In addition, AIGs
insurance operations held investments with a fair value totaling
$3.1 billion in CDOs, of which $39 million included
some level of subprime exposure. AIGs RMBS investments are
predominantly in highly-rated tranches that contain substantial
protection features through collateral subordination. At
June 30, 2008, approximately 87 percent of these
investments were rated AAA, and approximately 8 percent
were rated AA by one or more of the principal rating agencies.
AIGs investments rated BBB or below totaled
$2.7 billion, or less than 0.3 percent of AIGs
total invested assets at June 30, 2008. As of July 30,
2008, $10.9 billion of AIGs RMBS backed primarily by
subprime collateral had been downgraded as a result of rating
agency actions since January 1, 2008, and $212 million
of such investments had been upgraded. Of the downgrades,
$10.0 billion were AAA rated securities. In addition to the
downgrades, as of July 30, 2008, the rating agencies had
$6.1 billion of RMBS on watch for downgrade.
109
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
The amortized cost of AIGs RMBS investments, other than
those of AIGFP, at June 30, 2008 by year of vintage and
credit rating were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year of Vintage | |
|
|
| |
(in billions) | |
|
Prior | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
Total | |
|
Rating:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total RMBS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
$ |
8,968 |
|
|
$ |
6,057 |
|
|
$ |
13,149 |
|
|
$ |
20,561 |
|
|
$ |
15,485 |
|
|
$ |
3,011 |
|
|
$ |
67,231 |
|
|
AA
|
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
1,539 |
|
|
|
1,940 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,407 |
|
|
A
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1,154 |
|
|
BBB and below
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
964 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
2,739 |
|
|
Total RMBS
|
|
$ |
10,387 |
|
|
$ |
7,204 |
|
|
$ |
15,331 |
|
|
$ |
23,644 |
|
|
$ |
17,892 |
|
|
$ |
3,073 |
|
|
$ |
77,531 |
|
|
Alt-A RMBS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
$ |
753 |
|
|
$ |
850 |
|
|
$ |
4,312 |
|
|
$ |
7,606 |
|
|
$ |
5,290 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18,811 |
|
|
AA
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,085 |
|
|
A
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
BBB and below
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
Total Alt-A
|
|
$ |
1,036 |
|
|
$ |
1,082 |
|
|
$ |
4,770 |
|
|
$ |
7,736 |
|
|
$ |
5,612 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20,236 |
|
|
Subprime RMBS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
$ |
398 |
|
|
$ |
423 |
|
|
$ |
4,403 |
|
|
$ |
7,760 |
|
|
$ |
3,884 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16,868 |
|
|
AA
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,690 |
|
|
A
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
436 |
|
|
BBB and below
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
994 |
|
|
Total Subprime
|
|
$ |
605 |
|
|
$ |
653 |
|
|
$ |
4,934 |
|
|
$ |
9,146 |
|
|
$ |
4,650 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,988 |
|
|
AIGs underwriting practices for investing in RMBS, other
ABS and CDOs take into consideration the quality of the
originator, the manager, the servicer, security credit ratings,
underlying characteristics of the mortgages, borrower
characteristics, and the level of credit enhancement in the
transaction. AIGs strategy is typically to invest in
securities rated AA or better and create diversification across
multiple underlying asset classes.
Investments in CMBS
The amortized cost of AIGs CMBS investments, other than
those of AIGFP, at June 30, 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized | |
|
Percent | |
(in millions) |
|
Cost | |
|
of Total | |
|
CMBS (traditional)
|
|
$ |
20,819 |
|
|
|
91 |
% |
ReRemic/ CRE CDO
|
|
|
1,465 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Agency
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Other
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
22,935 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
The percentage of AIGs CMBS investments, other than
those of AIGFP, at June 30, 2008 by credit rating was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage | |
|
Rating:
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
|
79 |
% |
|
AA
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
A
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
BBB and below
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
The percentage of AIGs CMBS investments, other than
those of AIGFP, by year of vintage at June 30, 2008 was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage | |
|
Year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
2007
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
2006
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
2005
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
2004
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
2003 and prior
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
110
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
The percentage of AIGs CMBS investments, other than
those of AIGFP, by geographic region at June 30, 2008 was
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage | |
|
Geographic region:
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
California
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Virginia
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Illinois
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
New Jersey
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Georgia
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Massachusetts
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
At June 30, 2008, AIG held $23 billion in cost basis
of CMBS. Approximately 79 percent of such holdings were
rated AAA, approximately 19 percent were rated AA or A, and
approximately 2 percent were rated BBB or below. At
June 30, 2008, all such securities were current in the
payment of principal and interest.
There have been disruptions in the commercial mortgage markets
in general, and the CMBS market in particular, with credit
default swaps indices and quoted prices of securities at levels
consistent with a severe correction in lease rates, occupancy
and fair value of properties. In addition, spreads in the
primary mortgage market have widened significantly.
While this capital market stress has not to date been reflected
in the performance of commercial mortgage securitization in the
form of increased defaults in underlying mortgage pools, pricing
of CMBS has been adversely affected by market perceptions that
underlying mortgage defaults will increase. As a result, AIG
recognized $387 million of other-than-temporary impairment
charges in the three-month period ended June 30, 2008 on
CMBS trading at a severe discount to cost, despite the absence
of any deterioration in performance of the underlying credits,
because AIG concluded that it could not reasonably assert that
the recovery period was temporary. At this time, AIG anticipates
substantial recovery of principal and interest on the securities
to which such other-than-temporary impairment charges were
recorded.
Investments in CDOs
The amortized cost of AIGs CDO investments, other than
those of AIGFP, by collateral type at June 30, 2008 was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized | |
|
Percent | |
(in millions) |
|
Cost | |
|
of Total | |
|
Collateral Type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank loans (CLO)
|
|
$ |
2,108 |
|
|
|
51 |
% |
|
Synthetic investment grade
|
|
|
1,233 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
733 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
Subprime ABS
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
4,120 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
The amortized cost of the AIGs CDO investments, other
than those of AIGFP, by credit rating at June 30, 2008 was
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized | |
|
Percent | |
(in millions) |
|
Cost | |
|
of Total | |
|
Rating:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
$ |
872 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
AA
|
|
|
766 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
A
|
|
|
2,085 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
Below investment grade and equity
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
4,120 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Securities Lending Activities
AIGs securities lending program is a centrally managed
program by AIG Investments for the benefit of certain of
AIGs insurance companies and the Asset Management segment.
Securities are loaned to various financial institutions,
primarily major banks and brokerage firms. Cash collateral
generally ranging from 100 to 102 percent of the fair value of
the loaned securities is received and is invested in fixed
maturity securities to earn a net spread. To the extent that the
collateral received is less than 102 percent, AIG has
agreed with its insurance companies to deposit funds to the
collateral pool for the benefit of the insurance company
participants.
AIGs liability to the borrower for collateral received was
$75.1 billion and the fair value of the collateral
reinvested was $59.5 billion as of June 30, 2008. In
addition to the invested collateral, the securities on loan as
well as all of the assets of the lending companies are generally
available to satisfy the liability for collateral received.
The composition of the securities lending invested collateral
by credit rating at June 30, 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BBB/Not | |
|
Short- | |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
AAA | |
|
AA | |
|
A | |
|
Rated | |
|
Term | |
|
Total | |
|
Corporate debt
|
|
$ |
696 |
|
|
$ |
7,407 |
|
|
$ |
3,557 |
|
|
$ |
1,245 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12,905 |
|
Mortgage-backed, asset-backed and collateralized
|
|
|
30,933 |
|
|
|
3,170 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
1,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,180 |
|
Cash and short-term investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,445 |
|
|
|
10,445 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
31,629 |
|
|
$ |
10,577 |
|
|
$ |
3,994 |
|
|
$ |
2,885 |
|
|
$ |
10,445 |
|
|
$ |
59,530 |
|
|
111
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Participation in the securities lending program by reporting
unit at June 30, 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent | |
|
|
Participation | |
|
Domestic Life Insurance and Domestic Retirement Services
|
|
|
71 |
% |
Foreign Life Insurance
|
|
|
11 |
|
AIG Property Casualty Group
|
|
|
4 |
|
Foreign General Insurance
|
|
|
5 |
|
Asset Management
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
On June 30, 2008, $7.3 billion (or 10 percent) of
the liabilities were one-day tenor. These one-day tenor loans do
not have a contractual end date but are terminable by either
party on demand. Substantially all of the balance of the
liabilities contractually mature over the next thirty days.
However, the maturing loans are frequently renewed and rolled
over to extended dates. Collateral held for this program at
June 30, 2008 included interest bearing cash equivalents
with overnight maturities of $10.4 billion and other
short-term investments of $1.4 billion.
Liquidity in the securities pool is managed based upon
historical experience regarding volatility of daily, weekly and
biweekly loan balances. The decline in the level of securities
lent, and thus the liability for collateral due back to the
borrowers, is the result of AIGs overall strategy to
reduce the size of this program over time.
In addition, the invested securities are carried at fair value
with unrealized gains and losses recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) while net realized gains and losses
are recorded in earnings. The net unrealized loss on the
investments was $8.2 billion as of June 30, 2008.
During the three- and six-month periods ended June 30,
2008, AIG recorded net realized losses of $3.8 billion and
$6.7 billion, respectively, on this portfolio,
predominantly related to other-than-temporary impairments.
AIG has agreed to deposit into the securities pool an amount
equal to the investment losses realized by the pool in
connection with sales of impaired securities, up to
$5 billion.
Portfolio Review
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
AIG assesses its ability to hold any fixed maturity security in
an unrealized loss position to its recovery, including fixed
maturity securities classified as available for sale, at each
balance sheet date. The decision to sell any such fixed maturity
security classified as available for sale reflects the judgment
of AIGs management that the security sold is unlikely to
provide, on a relative value basis, as attractive a return in
the future as alternative securities entailing comparable risks.
With respect to distressed securities, the sale decision
reflects managements judgment that the risk-discounted
anticipated ultimate recovery is less than the value achievable
on sale.
AIG evaluates its investments for impairments in valuation as
well as credit. The determination that a security has incurred
an other-than-temporary decline in value requires the judgment
of management and consideration of the fundamental condition of
the issuer, its near-term prospects and all the relevant facts
and circumstances. See Critical Accounting Estimates
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments herein for further information
on AIGs policy.
Once a security has been identified as other-than-temporarily
impaired, the amount of such impairment is determined by
reference to that securitys contemporaneous fair value and
recorded as a charge to earnings.
In light of the recent significant disruption in the
U.S. residential mortgage and credit markets, AIG has
recognized an other-than-temporary impairment charge (severity
loss) of $4.8 billion and $8.9 billion in the three-
and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008, primarily
related to certain RMBS and other structured securities. Even
while retaining their investment grade ratings and timely
continuation of interest and principal payments, such securities
were priced at a significant discount to cost (generally below
60 cents on the dollar). Notwithstanding AIGs intent
and ability to hold such securities indefinitely, and despite
structures that indicate that a substantial amount of the
securities should continue to perform in accordance with
original terms, AIG concluded that it could not reasonably
assert that the recovery period would be temporary.
As a result of AIGs periodic evaluation of its securities
for other-than-temporary impairments in value, AIG recorded
other-than-temporary impairment charges of $6.8 billion and
$417 million in the three-month periods ended June 30,
2008 and 2007, respectively, and $12.4 billion and
$884 million in the six-month periods ended June 30,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
In addition to the above severity losses, AIG recorded
other-than-temporary impairment charges in the three- and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 related to:
|
|
|
|
|
securities that AIG does not intend to hold until recovery; |
|
|
|
declines due to foreign exchange rates; |
|
|
|
issuer-specific credit events; |
|
|
|
certain structured securities impaired under Emerging Issues
Task Force Issue
No. 99-20,
Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased
Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests that Continue to
be Held by a Transferor in Securitized Financial Assets;
and |
|
|
|
other impairments, including equity securities and partnership
investments. |
112
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
The composition of net realized capital gains (losses), which
include other-than-temporary impairments, were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Six Months | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
June 30, | |
|
June 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
(in millions) |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
Sales of fixed maturities
|
|
$ |
(29 |
) |
|
$ |
(210 |
) |
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
$ |
(169 |
) |
Sales of equity securities
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
Sales of real estate and other assets
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
499 |
|
Other-than-temporary impairments
|
|
|
(6,777 |
) |
|
|
(417 |
) |
|
|
(12,370 |
) |
|
|
(884 |
) |
Foreign exchange transactions
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
(738 |
) |
|
|
(108 |
) |
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
(6,081 |
) |
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,170 |
) |
|
$ |
(98 |
) |
|
113
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Other-than-temporary impairment charges by reporting segment
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Life | |
|
|
|
|
Insurance & | |
|
|
|
|
General | |
|
Retirement | |
|
Financial | |
|
Asset | |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Insurance | |
|
Services | |
|
Services | |
|
Management | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
| |
Three months ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment Type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severity
|
|
$ |
(633 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,374 |
) |
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
(820 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(4,843 |
) |
|
Trading at 25 percent or more discount for nine consecutive
months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lack of intent to hold to recovery
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(241 |
) |
|
Foreign currency declines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(633 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(633 |
) |
|
Issuer-specific credit events
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(276 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(322 |
) |
|
Adverse projected cash flows on structured securities
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(673 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(738 |
) |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
(685 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,193 |
) |
|
$ |
(17 |
) |
|
$ |
(882 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(6,777 |
) |
|
Three months ended June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment Type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severity
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Trading at 25 percent or more discount for nine consecutive
months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
Lack of intent to hold to recovery
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
Foreign currency declines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
Issuer-specific credit events
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
Adverse projected cash flows on structured securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
(84 |
) |
|
$ |
(324 |
) |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
(417 |
) |
|
Six months ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment Type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severity
|
|
$ |
(745 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,530 |
) |
|
$ |
(27 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,645 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,948 |
) |
|
Trading at 25 percent or more discount for nine consecutive
months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lack of intent to hold to recovery
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(928 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,021 |
) |
|
Foreign currency declines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,034 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,034 |
) |
|
Issuer-specific credit events
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(388 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(493 |
) |
|
Adverse projected cash flows on structured securities
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(705 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(874 |
) |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
(840 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,585 |
) |
|
$ |
(29 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,915 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,370 |
) |
|
Six months ended June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment Type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severity
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Trading at 25 percent or more discount for nine consecutive
months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
Lack of intent to hold to recovery
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(298 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(374 |
) |
|
Foreign currency declines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(304 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(304 |
) |
|
Issuer-specific credit events
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
Adverse projected cash flows on structured securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
(130 |
) |
|
$ |
(716 |
) |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
(30 |
) |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
(884 |
) |
|
114
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Other-than-temporary severity-related impairment charges for
the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 by
type of security and credit rating were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Rating: | |
|
Other | |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
RMBS | |
|
CDO | |
|
CMBS | |
|
Securities | |
|
Total | |
| |
Three months ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
$ |
2,964 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
106 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,071 |
|
|
AA
|
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
737 |
|
|
A
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
BBB and below
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
Nonrated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
4,100 |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
$ |
387 |
|
|
$ |
309 |
|
|
$ |
4,843 |
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
2008*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
$ |
4,460 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
223 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
4,717 |
|
|
AA
|
|
|
1,556 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,669 |
|
|
A
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,026 |
|
|
BBB and below
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
934 |
|
|
Nonrated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Equities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
7,248 |
|
|
$ |
157 |
|
|
$ |
904 |
|
|
$ |
639 |
|
|
$ |
8,948 |
|
|
*Ratings
are as of the date of the impairment charge.
No other-than-temporary impairment charge with respect to any
one single counterparty was significant to AIGs
consolidated financial condition or results of operations, and
no individual other-than-temporary impairment charge exceeded
two percent of the consolidated net loss in the six-month period
ended June 30, 2008.
In periods subsequent to the recognition of an
other-than-temporary impairment charge for fixed maturity
securities that is not credit or foreign exchange related, AIG
generally accretes into income the discount or amortizes the
reduced premium resulting from the reduction in cost basis over
the remaining life of the security. The amount of accretion
recognized in earnings for the three- and six-month periods
ended June 30, 2008 was $75 million and
$87 million, respectively.
Commercial Mortgage Loan Exposure
At June 30, 2008, AIG had direct commercial mortgage loan
exposure of $17.1 billion, with $15.8 billion
representing U.S. loan exposure. At that date,
substantially all of the U.S. loans were current. The
remaining commercial mortgage loans are secured predominantly by
properties in Japan. In addition, at June 30, 2008, AIG had
approximately $2.3 billion in residential mortgage loans in
jurisdictions outside the United States, primarily backed by
properties in Taiwan and Thailand.
115
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
An aging of the pre-tax unrealized losses of fixed maturity
and equity securities, distributed as a percentage of cost
relative to unrealized loss (the extent by which the fair value
is less than amortized cost or cost), including the number of
respective items, at June 30, 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Less than or equal | |
|
Greater than 20% | |
|
Greater than 50% | |
|
|
|
|
to 20% of Cost(b) | |
|
to 50% of Cost(b) | |
|
of Cost(b) | |
|
Total | |
Aging(a) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
(dollars in |
|
|
|
Unrealized | |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized | |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized | |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized | |
|
|
millions) |
|
Cost(c) | |
|
Loss | |
|
Items | |
|
Cost(c) | |
|
Loss | |
|
Items | |
|
Cost(c) | |
|
Loss | |
|
Items | |
|
Cost(c) | |
|
Loss(d) | |
|
Items | |
| |
Investment grade bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-6 months
|
|
$ |
133,610 |
|
|
$ |
4,302 |
|
|
|
19,544 |
|
|
$ |
1,910 |
|
|
$ |
467 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
135,520 |
|
|
$ |
4,769 |
|
|
|
19,878 |
|
|
7-12 months
|
|
|
56,297 |
|
|
|
4,597 |
|
|
|
4,337 |
|
|
|
23,676 |
|
|
|
7,118 |
|
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,973 |
|
|
|
11,715 |
|
|
|
5,077 |
|
|
>12 months
|
|
|
58,277 |
|
|
|
4,773 |
|
|
|
8,523 |
|
|
|
7,541 |
|
|
|
2,074 |
|
|
|
827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,818 |
|
|
|
6,847 |
|
|
|
9,350 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
248,184 |
|
|
$ |
13,672 |
|
|
|
32,404 |
|
|
$ |
33,127 |
|
|
$ |
9,659 |
|
|
|
1,901 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
281,311 |
|
|
$ |
23,331 |
|
|
|
34,305 |
|
|
Below investment grade bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-6 months
|
|
$ |
6,215 |
|
|
$ |
173 |
|
|
|
1,384 |
|
|
$ |
154 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,369 |
|
|
$ |
227 |
|
|
|
1,408 |
|
|
7-12 months
|
|
|
1,294 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,368 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
>12 months
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,222 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
554 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
8,672 |
|
|
$ |
346 |
|
|
|
2,273 |
|
|
$ |
287 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,959 |
|
|
$ |
436 |
|
|
|
2,332 |
|
|
Total bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-6 months
|
|
$ |
139,826 |
|
|
$ |
4,475 |
|
|
|
20,928 |
|
|
$ |
2,064 |
|
|
$ |
521 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
141,890 |
|
|
$ |
4,996 |
|
|
|
21,286 |
|
|
7-12 months
|
|
|
57,590 |
|
|
|
4,691 |
|
|
|
4,686 |
|
|
|
23,750 |
|
|
|
7,139 |
|
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,340 |
|
|
|
11,830 |
|
|
|
5,447 |
|
|
>12 months
|
|
|
59,440 |
|
|
|
4,852 |
|
|
|
9,063 |
|
|
|
7,600 |
|
|
|
2,089 |
|
|
|
841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,040 |
|
|
|
6,941 |
|
|
|
9,904 |
|
|
Total(e)
|
|
$ |
256,856 |
|
|
$ |
14,018 |
|
|
|
34,677 |
|
|
$ |
33,414 |
|
|
$ |
9,749 |
(f) |
|
|
1,960 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
290,270 |
|
|
$ |
23,767 |
|
|
|
36,637 |
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-6 months
|
|
$ |
4,590 |
|
|
$ |
336 |
|
|
|
3,900 |
|
|
$ |
316 |
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
|
667 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,906 |
|
|
$ |
422 |
|
|
|
4,567 |
|
|
7-12 months
|
|
|
747 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,128 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
|
>12 months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
5,337 |
|
|
$ |
422 |
|
|
|
4,225 |
|
|
$ |
697 |
|
|
$ |
194 |
|
|
|
939 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,034 |
|
|
$ |
616 |
|
|
|
5,164 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Represents the number of consecutive months that fair value
has been less than cost by any amount. |
(b) |
Represents the percentage by which fair value is less than
cost at the balance sheet date. |
|
|
(c) |
For bonds, represents amortized cost. |
|
|
(d) |
The effect on net income of unrealized losses after taxes
will be mitigated upon realization because certain realized
losses will be charged to participating policyholder accounts,
or realization will result in current decreases in the
amortization of certain DAC. |
|
|
(e) |
Includes securities lending invested collateral. |
|
|
(f) |
Of this $9.7 billion, $6.7 billion relates to RMBS,
CMBS, CDOs and ABS with unrealized losses between
25 percent and 50 percent; and $1.9 billion
relates to RMBS, CMBS, CDOs and ABS with unrealized losses
between 20 percent and 25 percent. The balance
represents all other classes of fixed maturity securities. |
The aging of the unrealized losses of RMBS, CMBS, CDOs and
ABS with fair values between 20 percent and 50 percent
less than their cost at June 30, 2008 (in footnote (f)
to the table above) is shown in the table below, which provides
the period in which those securities in unrealized loss
positions would become candidates for impairment solely because
they have been trading at a discount for nine consecutive months
(AIGs other-than-temporary aging guideline) without regard
to the level of discount (AIGs other-than-temporary
trading level guideline), assuming prices remained unchanged.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Third | |
|
Fourth | |
|
First | |
|
|
|
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
2008 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
Total | |
Unrealized loss percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
25 to 50 percent
|
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
3,574 |
|
|
$ |
3,104 |
|
|
$ |
6,747 |
|
|
20 to less than 25 percent
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
1,856 |
|
|
$ |
1,897 |
|
|
Given the current difficult market conditions, AIG is not able
to predict reasonably likely changes in the prices of these
securities. Moreover, AIG is unable to assess the effect, if
any, that recent transactions involving sales of large
portfolios of CDOs will have on the pricing of its available for
sale securities.
Unrealized gains and losses
At June 30, 2008, the carrying value of AIGs fixed
maturity and equity securities aggregated $516.4 billion.
At June 30, 2008, aggregate pre-tax unrealized gains for
fixed maturity and equity securities were $13.1 billion
($8.5 billion after tax).
At June 30, 2008, the aggregate pre-tax gross unrealized losses
on fixed maturity and equity securities were
116
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
$24.4 billion ($15.9 billion after tax). Additional
information about these securities is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
These securities were valued, in the aggregate, at approximately
92 percent of their current amortized cost. |
|
|
|
Approximately 12 percent of these securities were valued at
less than 20 percent of their current cost, or amortized
cost. |
|
|
|
Approximately three percent of the fixed maturity securities had
issuer credit ratings that were below investment grade. |
AIG did not consider these securities in an unrealized loss
position to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30,
2008, because management has the intent and ability to hold
these investments until they recover their cost basis. AIG
believes the securities will generally continue to perform in
accordance with the original terms, notwithstanding the present
price declines.
For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008,
unrealized losses related to investment grade bonds increased
$1.0 billion ($0.7 billion after tax) and
$10.5 billion ($6.8 billion after tax), respectively,
reflecting the widening of credit spreads, partially offset by
the effects of a decline in risk-free interest rates.
The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity
securities available for sale in an unrealized loss position at
June 30, 2008, by contractual maturity, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Amortized | |
|
Fair | |
(in millions) |
|
Cost | |
|
Value | |
| |
Due in one year or less
|
|
$ |
8,067 |
|
|
$ |
7,945 |
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
43,226 |
|
|
|
41,595 |
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
68,941 |
|
|
|
65,592 |
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
77,824 |
|
|
|
72,700 |
|
Mortgage-backed, asset-backed and collateralized
|
|
|
92,212 |
|
|
|
78,671 |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
290,270 |
|
|
$ |
266,503 |
|
|
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2008, the pre-tax
realized losses incurred with respect to the sale of fixed
maturities and equity securities were $0.8 billion. The
aggregate fair value of securities sold was $8.9 billion,
which was approximately 92 percent of amortized cost. The
average period of time that securities sold at a loss during the
six-month period ended June 30, 2008 were trading
continuously at a price below book value was approximately five
months. See Risk Management Corporate Risk
Management Credit Risk Management in the 2007 Annual
Report on
Form 10-K for an
additional discussion of investment risks associated with
AIGs investment portfolio.
Risk Management
For a complete discussion of AIGs risk management program,
see Risk Management in the 2007 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
AIG has continued to invest in human resources, systems and
processes in the enterprise risk management functions, both at
the corporate and business unit levels. These efforts include
implementing systems and processes to ensure the aggregation of
the various categories of risk across business units and as a
whole, and incorporating forward-looking analyses and stress
tests. These initiatives are ongoing and will take time to
implement, including the hiring of additional qualified
personnel.
Credit Risk Management
AIG defines its aggregate credit exposures to a counterparty as
the sum of its fixed maturities, loans, finance leases,
derivatives (mark to market), deposits (in the case of financial
institutions) and the specified credit equivalent exposure to
certain insurance products which embody credit risk.
The following table presents AIGs largest credit
exposures at June 30, 2008 as a percentage of total
consolidated shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Credit Exposure | |
|
|
as a Percentage of Total | |
|
|
Consolidated | |
Category |
|
Risk Rating(a) | |
|
Shareholders Equity | |
|
Investment Grade:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 largest combined
|
|
|
A+ (weighted) average |
(b) |
|
|
113.9 |
% |
|
Single largest non- sovereign (financial institution)
|
|
|
A+ |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
Single largest corporate
|
|
|
AAA |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
Single largest sovereign
|
|
|
A |
|
|
|
22.2 |
|
Non-Investment Grade:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single largest sovereign
|
|
|
BB+ |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
Single largest non- sovereign
|
|
|
BB+ |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Risk rating is based on external ratings, or equivalent based
on AIGs internal risk rating process. |
|
(b) |
Five of the ten largest credit exposures are to highly-rated
financial institutions and four are to investment-grade rated
sovereigns; none is rated lower than BBB+ or its equivalent. |
AIG closely controls its aggregate cross-border exposures to
avoid excessive concentrations in any one country or regional
group of countries. AIG defines its cross-border exposure to
include both cross-border credit exposures and its large
cross-border investments in its own international subsidiaries.
Thirteen countries had cross-border exposures in excess of
10 percent of total consolidated shareholders equity
at June 30, 2008. At that date eight were AAA-rated, four
were AA-rated and one was A-rated.
In addition, AIG closely monitors its industry concentrations,
the risks of which are often mitigated by the breadth and scope
of AIGs international operations. Excluding the U.S.
residential and commercial mortgage sectors, AIGs single
largest industry credit exposure is to the highly-rated global
financial institutions sector, accounting for 128 percent of
total consolidated shareholders equity at June 30,
2008 (compared to 87 percent at December 31, 2007, as
a portion of the proceeds of the May 2008 capital raising was
deposited with banks). AIGs other industry credit
117
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
concentrations in excess of 10 percent of total
consolidated shareholders equity are in the following
industries (in descending order by approximate size):
|
|
|
Oil and gas; |
|
|
Electric and water utilities; |
|
|
European regional financial institutions; |
|
|
Global life insurance carriers; |
|
|
Global telecommunications companies; |
|
|
U.S.-based regional financial institutions; |
|
|
Global securities firms and exchanges; |
|
|
Global reinsurance firms; |
|
|
Government sponsored entities; |
|
|
Healthcare companies; and |
|
|
Retail companies. |
Other than as described above, there were no significant changes
to AIGs credit exposures as set forth in Risk
Management Corporate Risk Management
Credit Risk Management in the 2007 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Market Risk Management
Insurance, Asset Management and
Non-Trading Financial Services Value at Risk (VaR)
AIG performs one comprehensive VaR analysis across all of its
non-trading businesses, and a separate VaR analysis for its
trading business at AIGFP. The comprehensive VaR is categorized
by AIG business segment (General Insurance, Life Insurance &
Retirement Services, Financial Services and Asset Management)
and also by market risk factor (interest rate, currency and
equity). AIGs market risk VaR calculations include
exposures to benchmark Treasury or swap interest rates, but do
not include exposures to credit-based factors such as credit
spreads. AIGs credit exposures within its invested assets
and credit derivative portfolios are discussed in Risk
Management Segment Risk Management
Financial Services in the 2007 Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
For the insurance segments, assets included are invested assets
(excluding direct holdings of real estate) and liabilities
included are reserve for losses and loss expenses, reserve for
unearned premiums, future policy benefits for life and accident
and health insurance contracts and other policyholders
funds. For financial services companies, loans and leases
represent the majority of assets represented in the VaR
calculation, while bonds and notes issued represent the majority
of liabilities.
AIG calculated the VaR with respect to net fair values as of
June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007. The VaR number
represents the maximum potential loss as of those dates that
could be incurred with a 95 percent confidence (i.e., only
five percent of historical scenarios show losses greater than
the VaR figure) within a one-month holding period. AIG uses the
historical simulation methodology that entails repricing all
assets and liabilities under explicit changes in market rates
within a specific historical time period. AIG uses the most
recent three years of historical market information for interest
rates, foreign exchange rates, and equity index prices. For each
scenario, each transaction was repriced. Segment and AIG-wide
scenario values are then calculated by netting the values of all
the underlying assets and liabilities.
118
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
The following table presents the period-end, average, high
and low VaRs on a diversified basis and of each component of
market risk for AIGs non-trading businesses. The
diversified VaR is usually smaller than the sum of its
components due to correlation effects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
2008 | |
|
2007 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, | |
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
As of | |
|
| |
|
As of | |
|
| |
(in millions) |
|
June 30 | |
|
Average | |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
December 31 | |
|
Average | |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
| |
Total AIG non-trading market risk:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversified
|
|
$ |
6,645 |
|
|
$ |
6,363 |
|
|
$ |
6,851 |
|
|
$ |
5,593 |
|
|
$ |
5,593 |
|
|
$ |
5,316 |
|
|
$ |
5,619 |
|
|
$ |
5,073 |
|
|
Interest rate
|
|
|
4,822 |
|
|
|
4,798 |
|
|
|
5,190 |
|
|
|
4,383 |
|
|
|
4,383 |
|
|
|
4,600 |
|
|
|
4,757 |
|
|
|
4,383 |
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
1,022 |
|
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
1,022 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
685 |
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
3,138 |
|
|
|
3,011 |
|
|
|
3,268 |
|
|
|
2,627 |
|
|
|
2,627 |
|
|
|
2,183 |
|
|
|
2,627 |
|
|
|
1,873 |
|
General Insurance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversified
|
|
$ |
1,377 |
|
|
$ |
1,365 |
|
|
$ |
1,377 |
|
|
$ |
1,356 |
|
|
$ |
1,363 |
|
|
$ |
1,637 |
|
|
$ |
1,892 |
|
|
$ |
1,363 |
|
|
Interest rate
|
|
|
1,218 |
|
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
1,218 |
|
|
|
1,078 |
|
|
|
1,117 |
|
|
|
1,492 |
|
|
|
1,792 |
|
|
|
1,117 |
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
958 |
|
|
|
1,030 |
|
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
573 |
|
Life Insurance & Retirement Services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversified
|
|
$ |
6,096 |
|
|
$ |
5,853 |
|
|
$ |
6,284 |
|
|
$ |
5,180 |
|
|
$ |
5,180 |
|
|
$ |
4,848 |
|
|
$ |
5,180 |
|
|
$ |
4,574 |
|
|
Interest rate
|
|
|
4,658 |
|
|
|
4,683 |
|
|
|
4,987 |
|
|
|
4,405 |
|
|
|
4,405 |
|
|
|
4,465 |
|
|
|
4,611 |
|
|
|
4,287 |
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
693 |
|
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
678 |
|
|
|
568 |
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
2,196 |
|
|
|
2,072 |
|
|
|
2,210 |
|
|
|
1,810 |
|
|
|
1,810 |
|
|
|
1,512 |
|
|
|
1,810 |
|
|
|
1,293 |
|
Non-Trading Financial Services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversified
|
|
$ |
131 |
|
|
$ |
132 |
|
|
$ |
167 |
|
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
$ |
170 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
Interest rate
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Asset Management:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversified
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
Interest rate
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
AIGs total non-trading market risk VaR increased from
$5.6 billion at year-end 2007 to $6.6 billion at
June 30, 2008. The biggest drivers of this increase were
updated liability cash flow projections, increased volatilities
in equity markets and tail effects (increased
riskiness of the worst 5 percent of simulated portfolio
outcomes that determine VaR).
Capital Markets Trading VaR
AIGFP attempts to minimize risk in benchmark interest rates,
equities, commodities and foreign exchange. Market exposures in
option implied volatilities, correlations and basis risks are
also minimized over time.
AIGFPs minimal reliance on market risk driven revenue is
reflected in its VaR. AIGFPs VaR calculation is based on
the interest rate, equity, commodity and foreign exchange risk
arising from its portfolio. Credit-related factors, such as
credit spreads or credit default, are not included in
AIGFPs VaR calculation. Because the market risk with
respect to securities available for sale, at market, is
substantially hedged, segregation of the financial instruments
into trading and other than trading was not considered
necessary. AIGFP operates under established market risk limits
based upon this VaR calculation. In addition, AIGFP backtests
its VaR.
In the calculation of VaR for AIGFP, AIG uses the historical
simulation methodology based on estimated changes to the value
of all transactions under explicit changes in market rates and
prices within a specific historical time period. AIGFP attempts
to secure reliable and independent current market prices, such
as published exchange prices, external subscription services
such as Bloomberg or Reuters, or third-party or broker quotes.
When such prices are not available, AIGFP uses an internal
methodology that includes extrapolation from observable and
verifiable prices nearest to the dates of the transactions.
Historically, actual results have not deviated from these models
in any material respect.
AIGFP reports its VaR level using a 95 percent confidence
level and a one-day holding period, facilitating risk comparison
with AIGFPs trading peers and reflecting the fact that
market risks can be actively assumed and offset in AIGFPs
trading portfolio.
119
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
The following table presents the year-end, average, high, and
low VaRs on a diversified basis and of each component of market
risk for Capital Markets operations. The diversified VaR is
usually smaller than the sum of its components due to
correlation effects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 | |
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007 | |
|
|
As of | |
|
| |
|
As of | |
|
| |
(in millions) |
|
June 30 | |
|
Average | |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
December 31 | |
|
Average | |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
| |
Capital Markets trading market risk:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversified
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
Interest rate
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Commodity
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Credit Derivatives
AIGFP enters into credit derivative transactions in the ordinary
course of its business. The majority of AIGFPs credit
derivatives require AIGFP to provide credit protection on a
designated portfolio of loans or debt securities. AIGFP provides
such credit protection on a second loss basis, under
which AIGFPs payment obligations arise only after credit
losses in the designated portfolio exceed a specified threshold
amount or level of first losses.
In certain cases, the credit risk associated with a designated
portfolio is tranched into different layers of risk, which are
then analyzed and rated by the credit rating agencies.
Typically, there will be an equity layer covering the first
credit losses in respect of the portfolio up to a specified
percentage of the total portfolio, and then successive layers
ranging from generally a BBB-rated layer to one or more
AAA-rated layers. In transactions that are rated with respect to
the risk layer or tranche that is immediately junior to the
threshold level above which AIGFPs payment obligation
would generally arise, a significant majority were rated AAA at
origination by the rating agencies. In transactions that are not
rated, AIGFP applies the same risk criteria for setting the
threshold level for its payment obligations. Therefore, the risk
layer assumed by AIGFP with respect to the designated portfolio
in these transactions is often called the super
senior risk layer, defined as the layer of credit risk
senior to a risk layer that has been rated AAA by the credit
rating agencies, or if the transaction is not rated, equivalent
thereto.
Approximately $307 billion (consisting of corporate loans
and prime residential mortgages) of the $441 billion in
notional exposure of AIGFPs super senior credit default
swap portfolio as of June 30, 2008 represented derivatives
written for financial institutions, principally in Europe, for
the purpose of providing regulatory capital relief rather than
risk mitigation. In exchange for a minimum guaranteed fee, the
counterparties receive credit protection with respect to
diversified loan portfolios they own, thus improving their
regulatory capital position. These derivatives are generally
expected to terminate at no additional cost to the counterparty
when they no longer provide the regulatory capital benefit. AIG
expects that the majority of these transactions will be
terminated within the next 9 to 21 months by AIGFPs
counterparties. As of July 31, 2008, $80.7 billion in
notional exposures have either been terminated or are in the
process of being terminated. AIGFP was not required to make any
payments as part of these terminations and in certain cases was
paid a fee upon termination.
In light of early termination experience to date and after other
comprehensive analyses, AIG determined that there was no
unrealized market valuation adjustment for this regulatory
capital relief portfolio for the six-month period ended
June 30, 2008 other than for transactions where AIGFP
believes the counterparties are no longer using the transactions
to obtain regulatory capital relief. AIG will continue to assess
the valuation of this portfolio and monitor developments in the
marketplace. Given the significant deterioration in the credit
markets and the risk that AIGFPs expectations with respect
to the termination of these transactions by its counterparties
may not materialize, there can be no assurance that AIG will not
recognize unrealized market valuation losses from this portfolio
in future periods, and recognition of even a small percentage
decline in the fair value of this portfolio could be material to
an individual reporting period.
During the second quarter of 2008, a regulatory capital relief
transaction with a notional amount of $1.6 billion and a
fair value loss of $125 million was not terminated as
expected when it no longer provided regulatory capital benefit
to the counterparty. This transaction provided protection on an
RMBS unlike the other regulatory transactions which provide
protection on loan portfolios held by the counterparties. The
documentation for this transaction contains provisions not
included in AIGFPs other regulatory capital relief
transactions, which enable the counterparty to arbitrage a
specific credit exposure.
Approximately $54 billion of the $441 billion in
notional exposure on AIGFPs super senior credit default
swaps as of June 30, 2008 was written on designated pools
of investment grade corporate debt and CLOs. AIG estimates
120
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
the fair value of this corporate credit default swap portfolio
by reference to benchmark indices, including the CDX and iTraxx,
and third-party prices and collateral calls. No assurance can be
given that the fair value of AIGs corporate credit default
swap portfolio would not change materially if other market
indices or pricing sources were used to estimate the fair value
of the portfolio.
In addition to writing credit protection on the super senior
risk layer on designated portfolios of loans or debt securities,
AIGFP also wrote protection on tranches below the super senior
risk layer. At June 30, 2008 the notional amount of the
credit default swaps in the regulatory capital relief portfolio
written on tranches below the super senior risk layer was $5.8
billion, with an estimated fair value loss of $171 million.
While the credit default swaps written on corporate debt
obligations are cash settled, the majority of the credit default
swaps written on CDOs and CLOs require physical settlement.
Under a physical settlement arrangement, AIGFP would be required
to purchase the referenced super senior security at par in the
event of a non-payment on that security. Certain of the AIGFP
credit default swaps with an aggregate notional amount totaling
$8.2 billion protect CDOs that include
over-collateralization provisions that adjust the value of the
collateral based, in part, on the ratings of the collateral
underlying the CDOs. If the over-collateralization provisions
are not satisfied, an event of default would occur creating a
right to accelerate. In certain of these circumstances, AIGFP
may be required to purchase the referenced super senior security
at par upon the acceleration of the security. As of
July 31, 2008, six CDOs for which AIGFP had written credit
protection on the super senior CDO securities had experienced
events of default. One of these CDOs has been accelerated and
AIGFP extinguished a portion of its swap obligations by
purchasing the protected CDO security for $103 million,
principal amount outstanding related to this obligation.
AIGFPs remaining notional exposure with respect to these
CDOs was $1.5 billion at July 31, 2008. AIGFP cannot
currently quantify its obligations which might occur in the
future under the foregoing provisions, or determine the timing
of any additional purchases that might be required. Therefore,
there can be no assurance that the extinguishment of these
obligations by AIGFP will not have a material effect on
AIGs liquidity.
AIGFP has written 2a-7 Puts in connection with certain
multi-sector CDOs that allow the holders of the securities to
treat the securities as eligible short-term 2a-7 investments
under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Holders of securities
are permitted, in certain circumstances, to tender their
securities to the issuers at par. If an issuers
remarketing agent is unable to resell the securities so
tendered, AIGFP must purchase the securities at par as long as
the security has not experienced a default. During the six-month
period ended June 30, 2008, AIGFP repurchased securities
with a principal amount of approximately $917 million in
connection with these obligations. In certain transactions,
AIGFP has contracted with third parties to provide liquidity for
the securities if they are put to AIGFP for up to a three-year
period. Such liquidity facilities totaled $8.5 billion at
June 30, 2008. As of August 5, 2008, AIGFP has
utilized $3.2 billion of these liquidity facilities. At
June 30, 2008, AIGFP had $11.3 billion of notional
exposure on 2a-7 Puts, included as part of the multi-sector CDO
portfolio discussed herein.
Certain of these credit derivatives are subject to collateral
posting provisions. These provisions differ among counterparties
and asset classes. In the case of most of the multi-sector CDO
transactions, the amount of collateral required is determined
based on the change in value of the underlying cash security
that represents the super senior risk layer subject to credit
protection, and not on the change in value of the super senior
credit derivative.
As of July 31, 2008, AIGFP had received collateral calls
from counterparties in respect of certain super senior credit
default swaps (including those entered into by counterparties
for regulatory capital relief purposes and those in respect of
corporate debt/CLOs). At times, valuation estimates made by
certain of the counterparties with respect to certain super
senior credit default swaps or the underlying reference CDO
securities, for purposes of determining the amount of collateral
required to be posted by AIGFP in connection with such
instruments, have differed significantly from AIGFPs
estimates. AIG is unable to assess the effect, if any, that
recent transactions involving sales of large portfolios of CDOs
will have on collateral posting requirements. In almost all
cases, AIGFP has been able to successfully resolve the
differences or otherwise reach an accommodation with respect to
collateral posting levels, including in certain cases by
entering into compromise collateral arrangements, some of which
are for specified periods of time. Due to the ongoing nature of
these collateral calls, AIGFP may engage in discussions with one
or more counterparties in respect of these differences at any
time. As of July 31, 2008, AIGFP had posted collateral (or
had received collateral, where offsetting exposures on other
transactions resulted in the counterparty posting to AIGFP)
based on exposures, calculated in respect of super senior credit
default swaps, in an aggregate net amount of $16.5 billion.
Valuation estimates made by counterparties for collateral
purposes were considered in the determination of the fair value
estimates of AIGFPs super senior credit default swap
portfolio.
The unrealized market valuation losses of $26.1 billion
recorded on AIGFPs super senior multi-sector CDO credit
default swap portfolio represents the cumulative change in fair
value of these derivatives, which represents AIGs best
estimate of the amount it would need to pay to a willing, able
and knowledgeable third party to assume the obligations under
121
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
AIGFPs super senior
multi-sector credit
default swap portfolio as of June 30, 2008.
Stress Testing/Sensitivity Analysis
At June 30, 2008, AIG used a roll rate analysis to stress
the AIGFP super senior multi-sector CDO credit default swap
portfolio for potential pre-tax realized credit losses that it
may incur if the multi-sector CDO super senior credit default
swap portfolio and the referenced obligations acquired by AIGFP
in extinguishing its obligations under the swaps are held to
maturity. Credit losses represent an estimate of the potential
shortfall of principal and/or interest cash flows on the
referenced obligations and credits underlying the portfolio that
will not be recovered assuming the portfolio and referenced
obligations are held to maturity. Two scenarios illustrated in
this process resulted in potential pre-tax realized credit
losses of approximately $5.0 billion (Scenario A) and
approximately $8.5 billion (Scenario B). Actual ultimate
realized credit losses are likely to vary, perhaps materially,
from these scenarios, and there can be no assurance that the
ultimate realized credit losses related to the AIGFP super
senior multi-sector CDO credit default swap portfolio will be
consistent with either scenario or that such realized credit
losses will not exceed the potential realized credit losses
illustrated by Scenario B.
In prior quarters, AIG conducted risk analyses of the AIGFP
super senior multi-sector CDO credit default swap portfolio
using certain ratings-based static stress tests, which centered
around scenarios of further stress on the portfolio resulting
from downgrades by the rating agencies from current levels on
the underlying collateral in the CDO structures supported by
AIGFPs credit default swaps. During the first quarter of
2008, AIG developed an additional methodology to conduct stress
tests for potential realized credit losses from AIGFPs
super senior multi-sector CDO credit default swap portfolio that
combined a roll rate estimate of the losses emanating from the
subprime and Alt-A RMBS
collateral securities in the multi-sector CDOs, plus an estimate
of losses arising from CDO securities (inner CDOs) and other
ABS, such as CMBS, credit card and auto loan ABS, held by the
CDOs. In conducting its risk analyses as of June 30, 2008,
AIG discontinued use of the rating-based static stress test and
used only the roll rate stress test because it believes that the
roll rate stress test provides a more reasonable analysis
methodology to illustrate potential realized credit losses than
the rating-based static stress test used previously.
In the second quarter of 2008, AIG stressed the AIGFP super
senior multi-sector CDO credit default swap portfolio using a
roll rate analysis as applied to all RMBS collateral including
subprime, Alt-A and
prime residential mortgages that comprise the subprime,
Alt-A and prime RMBS.
This analysis assumed that certain percentages of actual
delinquent mortgages will roll into default and foreclosure. It
also assumed that certain percentages of non-delinquent
mortgages will become delinquent and default over time, with
those delinquency percentages depending on the age of the
mortgage pool. To those assumed defaults AIG applied loss
severities (one minus recovery) to derive estimated ultimate
losses for each mortgage pool comprising a subprime,
Alt-A and prime RMBS.
Because subprime, Alt-A
and prime RMBS have differing characteristics, the roll rates
and loss severities differed. AIG then estimated tranche losses
from these roll rate losses by applying the pool losses up
through the capital structure of the RMBS. In this estimate of
tranche losses, AIG introduced in the quarter an enhancement to
the roll rate analysis to take into account the cash flow
waterfall and to capture the potential effects, both positive
and negative, of cash flow diversion within each CDO. To these
estimated subprime,
Alt-A and prime RMBS
losses AIG added estimated credit losses on the inner CDOs and
other ABS, such as CMBS, credit card and auto loan ABS,
calculated by using rating-based static percentages, in the case
of inner CDOs varying by vintage and type of CDO, and, in the
case of other ABS, by rating. In addition to the foregoing, the
analysis incorporates the effects of certain other factors such
as mortgage prepayment rates, excess spread and delinquency
triggers. The total of the roll rate losses and the losses on
the inner CDOs and other ABS using two different scenarios of
assumptions yielded estimated potential pre-tax realized credit
losses of approximately $5.0 billion and approximately
$8.5 billion.
At March 31, 2008, AIGs credit-based analyses
estimated potential
pre-tax realized credit
losses at approximately $1.2 billion to $2.4 billion.
The estimate of $2.4 billion was derived using the roll
rate stress test described above. The increase in the estimated
potential realized credit loss illustrated by Scenarios A
and B was the result of both enhancements to the model and
changes in the assumptions used. The model was enhanced by
inclusion of prime RMBS into the portfolio of securities
subjected to the roll rate analysis and the introduction of
analytics to capture the potential effects of the cash flow
waterfall. Changes in assumptions included revisions to the roll
rate percentages and loss severities on subprime and
Alt-A mortgages in view
of deteriorating real estate market conditions, as well as a
higher stress to other ABS collateral and the use of current
inner CDO ratings in the rating-based static percentage. The
potential realized credit loss illustrated by Scenario B is the
result of applying different, more highly stressed assumptions
to the roll rate analysis model than those used in Scenario A.
Due to the dislocation in the market for CDO and RMBS
collateral, AIG does not use the market values of the underlying
CDO collateral in estimating its potential realized credit
losses. The use of factors derived from market-observable prices
in models used to determine the estimates for future realized
credit losses could result in materially higher estimates of
potential realized credit losses.
Under the terms of most of these credit derivatives, credit
losses to AIG would generally result from the credit
122
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
impairment of the referenced obligations that AIG would acquire
in extinguishing its swap obligations. Based upon its most
current analyses, AIG believes that any credit losses which may
emerge over time at AIGFP will not be material to AIGs
consolidated financial condition, but could be material to
AIGs liquidity. Other types of analyses or models could
result in materially different estimates. AIG is aware that
other market participants have used different assumptions and
methodologies to estimate the potential realized credit losses
on AIGFPs super senior multi-sector CDO credit default
swap portfolio, resulting in significantly higher estimates than
those resulting from AIGs roll rate stress testing
scenarios. Actual ultimate realized credit losses are likely to
vary, perhaps materially, from AIGs roll rate stress
testing scenarios, and there can be no assurance that the
ultimate realized credit losses related to the AIGFP super
senior multi-sector CDO credit default swap portfolio will be
consistent with either scenario or that such realized credit
losses will not exceed the potential realized credit losses
illustrated by Scenario B.
The potential realized credit losses illustrated in
Scenarios A and B are lower than the fair value of
AIGFPs super senior multi-sector CDO credit default swap
portfolio, a net loss of $26.1 billion at June 30,
2008. The net loss represents AIGs best estimate of the
amount it would need to pay to a willing third party to assume
the obligations under AIGFPs super senior multi-sector CDO
credit default swap portfolio. The fair value of AIGFPs
super senior multi-sector CDO credit default swap portfolio is
based upon fair value accounting principles, which rely on
third-party prices for both the underlying collateral securities
and the CDOs that AIGFPs super senior credit default swaps
wrap. These prices currently incorporate liquidity premiums,
risk aversion elements and credit risk modeling, which in some
instances may use more conservative assumptions than those used
by AIG in its roll rate stress testing. Due to the ongoing
disruption in the U.S. residential mortgage market and credit
markets and the downgrades of RMBS and CDOs by the rating
agencies, the market continues to lack transparency around the
pricing of these securities. These prices are not necessarily
reflective of the ultimate potential realized credit losses
AIGFP could incur in the future related to the AIGFP super
senior multi-sector CDO credit default swap portfolio, and AIG
believes they incorporate a significant amount of market-driven
risk aversion.
|
|
ITEM 3. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk |
Included in Item 2. Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
|
|
ITEM 4. |
Controls and Procedures |
In connection with the preparation of this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q, an
evaluation was carried out by AIGs management, with the
participation of AIGs Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of AIGs disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Exchange Act)). Disclosure controls and procedures are designed
to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports
filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in SEC rules and forms and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosures. Solely as a result of
the previously identified material weakness in internal control
over the fair value valuation of the AIGFP super senior credit
default swap portfolio and oversight thereof as described in the
2007 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
AIGs Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
have concluded that, as of June 30, 2008, AIGs
disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective.
Notwithstanding the existence of this material weakness, AIG
believes that the consolidated financial statements in this
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fairly
present, in all material respects, AIGs consolidated
financial condition as of June 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007 and consolidated results of operations
for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2008
and 2007 and consolidated cash flows for the six-month periods
ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, in conformity with GAAP. In
addition, there has been no change in AIGs internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended
June 30, 2008 that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, AIGs internal
control over financial reporting.
Throughout 2008 and 2007, AIG recorded out of period
adjustments, many of which were detected as part of continuing
remediation efforts. It is AIGs policy to record all error
corrections, without regard to materiality, and AIG has an
established, formal process for the identification, evaluation
and recording of all out of period adjustments. This process
includes a heightened sensitivity for potential errors related
to the internal control matters discussed in Item 9A. of
the 2007 Annual Report on
Form 10-K. AIG
distinguishes error corrections from changes in estimates by
evaluating the facts and circumstances of such items, including
considering whether information was capable of being known at
the time of original recording. AIG has evaluated the
adjustments recorded in 2008 and 2007 from a qualitative and
quantitative perspective and concluded that such adjustments are
immaterial individually and in the aggregate to the current and
prior periods.
123
American International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Part II - OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
ITEM 2. |
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds |
Information with respect to purchases of AIG Common stock
during the three months ended June 30, 2008 was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of | |
|
of Shares that | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Shares | |
|
May Yet Be | |
|
|
|
|
Price | |
|
Purchased as | |
|
Purchased | |
|
|
Total | |
|
Paid | |
|
Part of Publicly | |
|
Under the Plans | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
per | |
|
Announced Plans | |
|
or Programs | |
Period |
|
Shares Purchased(a) | |
|
Share | |
|
or Programs | |
|
at End of Month(b) | |
|
April 1 - 30
|
|
|
3,832,276 |
|
|
$ |
46.78 |
|
|
|
3,832,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
May 1 - 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 1 - 30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,832,276 |
|
|
$ |
46.78 |
|
|
|
3,832,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Reflects date of delivery. Does not include 4,245 shares
delivered or attested to in satisfaction of the exercise price
by holders of AIG employee stock options exercised during the
three months ended June 30, 2008. |
(b) |
In February 2007, AIGs Board of Directors increased
AIGs share repurchase program by authorizing the
repurchase of shares with an aggregate purchase price of
$8 billion. In November 2007, AIGs Board of Directors
authorized the repurchase of an additional $8 billion in
common stock. A balance of $9 billion remained for
purchases under the program as of June 30, 2008. AIG does
not expect to purchase additional shares under its share
repurchase program for the foreseeable future. |
|
|
ITEM 4. |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
At the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 14, 2008,
the Shareholders:
(a) Elected thirteen directors as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominee |
|
Shares For | |
|
Shares Withheld | |
|
Abstained | |
|
Stephen F. Bollenbach
|
|
|
1,685,779,934 |
|
|
|
501,561,929 |
|
|
|
63,124,235 |
|
Martin S. Feldstein
|
|
|
1,691,691,682 |
|
|
|
506,469,958 |
|
|
|
52,304,458 |
|
Ellen V. Futter
|
|
|
1,652,157,470 |
|
|
|
542,842,042 |
|
|
|
55,466,586 |
|
Richard C. Holbrooke
|
|
|
1,518,501,128 |
|
|
|
675,477,016 |
|
|
|
56,487,954 |
|
Fred H. Langhammer
|
|
|
1,675,419,092 |
|
|
|
541,328,771 |
|
|
|
33,718,235 |
|
George L. Miles, Jr.
|
|
|
1,496,407,272 |
|
|
|
717,640,163 |
|
|
|
36,418,663 |
|
Morris W. Offit
|
|
|
1,532,712,325 |
|
|
|
682,550,113 |
|
|
|
35,203,660 |
|
James F. Orr III
|
|
|
1,603,644,400 |
|
|
|
609,750,276 |
|
|
|
37,071,422 |
|
Virginia M. Rometty
|
|
|
1,653,815,644 |
|
|
|
542,266,335 |
|
|
|
54,384,119 |
|
Martin J. Sullivan
|
|
|
1,691,337,900 |
|
|
|
520,729,226 |
|
|
|
38,398,972 |
|
Michael H. Sutton
|
|
|
1,499,773,544 |
|
|
|
715,209,935 |
|
|
|
35,482,619 |
|
Edmund S.W. Tse
|
|
|
1,690,069,518 |
|
|
|
521,903,489 |
|
|
|
38,493,091 |
|
Robert B. Willumstad
|
|
|
1,658,750,176 |
|
|
|
556,048,522 |
|
|
|
35,667,400 |
|
|
There were no broker non-votes with respect to this item.
|
|
(b) |
Approved by a vote of 1,599,775,289 shares for and 616,864,546
shares against, with 33,826,263 shares abstaining, a
proposal to ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
as the independent registered public accounting firm for 2008.
There were no broker non-votes with respect to this item. |
|
|
(c) |
Rejected by a vote of 313,891,912 shares for and 1,363,468,866
shares against, with 391,665,309 shares abstaining and
181,440,011 broker non-votes, a shareholder proposal relating to
the human right to water. |
|
|
(d) |
Rejected by a vote of 347,720,077 shares for and 1,357,015,652
shares against, with 364,290,358 shares abstaining and
181,440,011 broker non-votes, a shareholder proposal relating to
the reporting of political contributions. |
See accompanying Exhibit Index.
124
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed
on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. |
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
/s/ Steven J. Bensinger
|
|
|
|
Steven J. Bensinger |
|
Vice Chairman Financial Services and |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
/s/ David L. Herzog
|
|
|
|
David L. Herzog |
|
Senior Vice President and Comptroller |
|
Principal Accounting Officer |
Dated: August 6, 2008
125
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
Location |
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Statement re computation of per share earnings |
|
Included in Note 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
12
|
|
Computation of ratios of earnings to fixed charges |
|
Filed herewith. |
31
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications |
|
Filed herewith. |
32
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications |
|
Filed herewith. |