Form 10-Q
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
     
þ   Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
or
     
o   Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period from                     to                      .
Commission File Number: 000-30109
LUMINEX CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
DELAWARE   74-2747608
(State or other jurisdiction of   (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)   Identification No.)
     
12212 TECHNOLOGY BLVD., AUSTIN, TEXAS   78727
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)
(512) 219-8020
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
             
Large accelerated filer þ   Accelerated filer o   Non-accelerated filer o   Smaller reporting company o
        (Do not check if smaller reporting company)    
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
     There were 41,798,043 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding on November 2, 2009.
 
 

 


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS
         
    Page  
       
       
    1  
    2  
    3  
    4  
    12  
    29  
    29  
       
    30  
    30  
    30  
    31  
    S-1  
Exhibit 31.1
       
Exhibit 31.2
       
Exhibit 32.1
       
Exhibit 32.2
       
 Exhibit 31.1
 Exhibit 31.2
 Exhibit 32.1
 Exhibit 32.2

iii


Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1.   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
LUMINEX CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
    (unaudited)          
ASSETS
Current assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 78,740     $ 81,619  
Short-term investments
    16,516       40,501  
Accounts receivable, net
    19,116       11,024  
Inventory, net
    12,697       11,589  
Other
    1,641       1,660  
 
           
 
Total current assets
    128,710       146,393  
Property and equipment, net
    17,168       12,567  
Intangible assets, net
    13,428       14,901  
Long-term investments
    19,722       2,000  
Goodwill
    39,617       39,617  
Other
    1,370       1,813  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 220,015     $ 217,291  
 
           
 
               
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
               
Accounts payable
  $ 5,116     $ 4,580  
Accrued liabilities
    6,496       7,181  
Deferred revenue
    3,180       2,671  
Current portion of long term debt
    516       445  
 
           
 
               
Total current liabilities
    15,308       14,877  
 
               
Long-term debt
    3,672       2,914  
Deferred revenue and other
    4,768       4,960  
 
           
 
Total liabilities
    23,748       22,751  
 
           
 
               
Stockholders’ equity:
               
Common stock
    41       40  
Additional paid-in capital
    283,102       279,255  
Accumulated other comprehensive gain (loss)
    119       (47 )
Accumulated deficit
    (86,995 )     (84,708 )
 
           
 
Total stockholders’ equity
    196,267       194,540  
 
           
 
               
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 220,015     $ 217,291  
 
           
See the accompanying notes which are an integral part of these
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

1


Table of Contents

LUMINEX CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
    (unaudited)     (unaudited)  
Revenue
  $ 29,118     $ 28,897     $ 82,476     $ 76,250  
Cost of revenue
    10,347       9,343       26,837       24,876  
 
                       
Gross profit
    18,771       19,554       55,639       51,374  
Operating expenses:
                               
Research and development
    5,643       4,443       15,246       13,899  
Selling, general and administrative
    13,640       12,130       38,292       36,276  
 
                       
Total operating expenses
    19,283       16,573       53,538       50,175  
 
                       
Income (loss) from operations
    (512 )     2,981       2,101       1,199  
Interest expense from long-term debt
    (116 )     (137 )     (358 )     (406 )
Settlement of litigation
                (4,350 )      
Other income, net
    144       490       593       629  
 
                       
Income (loss) before income taxes
    (484 )     3,334       (2,014 )     1,422  
Income taxes
    (125 )     (161 )     (273 )     (374 )
 
                       
Net income (loss)
  $ (609 )   $ 3,173     $ (2,287 )   $ 1,048  
 
                       
Net income (loss) per share, basic
  $ (0.01 )   $ 0.08     $ (0.06 )   $ 0.03  
 
                       
Shares used in computing net income (loss) per share, basic
    40,661       40,002       40,515       37,056  
Net income (loss) per share, diluted
  $ (0.01 )   $ 0.08     $ (0.06 )   $ 0.03  
 
                       
Shares used in computing net income (loss) per share, diluted
    40,661       42,173       40,515       38,957  
See the accompanying notes which are an integral part of these
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

2


Table of Contents

LUMINEX CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
    (unaudited)     (unaudited)  
Cash flows from operating activities:
                               
Net income (loss)
  $ (609 )   $ 3,173     $ (2,287 )   $ 1,048  
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
                               
Depreciation and amortization
    2,116       1,821       5,995       5,125  
Stock-based compensation and other
    2,231       1,781       5,817       5,202  
Loss on disposal of assets
                25       7  
Other
    676       (131 )     1,257       467  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
                               
Accounts receivable, net
    (898 )     (2,771 )     (7,988 )     (985 )
Inventory, net
    (286 )     (1,034 )     (1,108 )     (3,039 )
Prepaids and other
    405       139       (26 )     (793 )
Accounts payable
    1,437       465       376       1,103  
Accrued liabilities
    1,295       (290 )     (3,023 )     (1,346 )
Deferred revenue
    (28 )     530       313       1,122  
 
                       
 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
    6,339       3,683       (649 )     7,911  
 
                       
 
                               
Cash flows from investing activities:
                               
Net purchases of available-for-sale investments
    (12,003 )           (56,649 )      
Maturities of available-for-sale investments
    17,986             22,980        
Net purchases of held-to-maturity investments
          (28,651 )           (36,541 )
Maturities of held-to-maturity investments
    3,938       1,477       40,078       6,435  
Purchase of property and equipment
    (3,502 )     (852 )     (8,618 )     (2,747 )
Acquisition activity
          (93 )           (505 )
Proceeds from sale of assets
          20               20  
Acquired technology rights
          (234 )     (21 )     (1,216 )
 
                       
 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
    6,419       (28,333 )     (2,230 )     (34,554 )
 
                       
Cash flows from financing activities:
                               
Payment on debt
                (440 )     (134 )
Proceeds from secondary offering, net of offering costs
          (104 )           74,675  
Proceeds from debt
                454        
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
    77       3,668       362       6,438  
 
                       
 
Net cash provided by financing activities
    77       3,564       376       80,979  
 
                       
 
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate on cash
    (246 )     25       (376 )     49  
Change in cash and cash equivalents
    12,589       (21,061 )     (2,879 )     54,385  
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
    66,151       102,679       81,619       27,233  
 
                       
 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 78,740     $ 81,618     $ 78,740     $ 81,618  
 
                       
See the accompanying notes which are an integral part of these
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3


Table of Contents

LUMINEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1 — BASIS OF PRESENTATION
     The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by Luminex Corporation (the “Company” or “Luminex”) in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by United States generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring entries) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2009. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
     Certain items in prior financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
     The Company’s comprehensive income or loss is comprised of net income or loss, unrealized gains and losses on securities classified as available for sale, and foreign currency translation. Comprehensive loss, net of tax, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 was approximately $555,000 and $2.1 million, respectively, and comprehensive income, net of tax, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 was approximately $3.1 million and $1.0 million respectively.
     The Company has two segments for financial reporting purposes: the Technology Segment and the Assay Segment. See Note 6 — Segment Information.
     The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the time of filing this Form 10-Q with the SEC on November 5, 2009. No material subsequent events have occurred since September 30, 2009 that required recognition or disclosure in these financial statements.
NOTE 2 — INVESTMENTS
     The Company determines the appropriate classification of its investments in debt and equity securities at the time of purchase and reevaluates such determinations at each balance sheet date. Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash deposits and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less when purchased. Debt securities are classified as held-to-maturity when the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity. Debt securities for which the Company does not have the intent or ability to hold to maturity are classified as available for sale. Held-to-maturity securities are stated at amortized cost, which approximates fair value of these investments. Marketable securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term are classified as trading securities and are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses recognized in earnings. Debt and marketable equity securities not classified as held-to-maturity or as trading are classified as available for sale, and are carried at fair market value, with the unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, included in the determination of comprehensive income and reported in stockholders’ equity. Marketable securities are recorded as either short-term or long-term on the balance sheet based on contractual maturity date. The fair value of all securities is determined by quoted market prices.
     Held-to-maturity securities as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 consisted of government sponsored debt obligations of $2.5 million and $42.8 million, respectively.

4


Table of Contents

LUMINEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
     Held-to-maturity securities consisted of the following as of September 30, 2009 (in thousands):
                         
            Accrued    
    Cost   Interest   Amortized Cost
Due in one year or less
  $ 2,423     $ 76     $ 2,499  
     Held-to-maturity securities consisted of the following as of December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
                         
            Accrued        
    Cost     Interest     Amortized Cost  
Due in one year or less
  $ 40,501     $ 283     $ 40,784  
Due after one year through two years
    2,000       20     $ 2,020  
 
                 
 
                       
Total held-to-maturity securities
  $ 42,501     $ 303     $ 42,804  
 
                 
     Available-for-sale securities consisted of the following as of September 30, 2009 (in thousands):
                                 
            Gains in     Losses in        
            Accumulated     Accumulated        
            Other     Other        
    Amortized     Comprehensive     Comprehensive     Estimated  
    Cost     Gain (Loss)     Gain (Loss)     Fair Value  
Current:
                               
Money Market funds
  $ 63,224     $     $     $ 63,224  
Non-government sponsored debt securities
    23,982       33             24,015  
 
                       
Total current securities
    87,206       33             87,239  
 
                               
Noncurrent:
                               
Non-government sponsored debt securities
    17,590       89       (9 )     17,670  
Government sponsored debt securities
    2,042       11             2,053  
 
                       
Total noncurrent securities
    19,632       100       (9 )     19,723  
 
                               
Total available-for-sale securities
  $ 106,838     $ 133     $ (9 )   $ 106,962  
 
                       
     There were no proceeds from the sales of available-for-sale securities during the three months or nine months ended September 30, 2009 or 2008. Net unrealized holding gains and losses on available-for-sale securities have been included in accumulated other comprehensive gain (loss).

5


Table of Contents

LUMINEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
     The estimated fair value of available-for-sale debt securities at September 30, 2009, by contractual maturity, was as follows (in thousands):
         
    Estimated  
    Fair Value  
Due in one year or less
  $ 24,015  
Due after one year through two years
    19,723  
 
     
 
  $ 43,738  
 
     
     Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because the issuers of the securities may have the right to prepay obligations without prepayment penalties.
     The Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The Codification describes a fair value hierarchy based on the following three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable:
     Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
     Level 2—Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
     Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
     The following table represents the Company’s fair value hierarchy for its financial assets (cash equivalents and investments) measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2009 (in thousands):
                                 
    Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using  
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Total  
Money Market funds
  $ 63,224                 $ 63,224  
Non-government sponsored debt obligations
    44,184                   44,184  
Government sponsored debt obligations
    2,053                   2,053  
 
                       
 
                               
Total
  $ 109,461                 $ 109,461  
 
                       
 
                               
Amounts included in:
                               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 73,223                 $ 73,223  
Short-term investments
    16,516                   16,516  
Long-term investments
    19,722                   19,722  
 
                       
 
                               
Total
  $ 109,461                 $ 109,461  
 
                       

6


Table of Contents

LUMINEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 3 — INVENTORY, NET
     Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined according to the standard cost method. Inventory consisted of the following (in thousands):
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
Parts and supplies
  $ 5,385     $ 5,213  
Work-in-progress
    4,266       3,939  
Finished goods
    3,046       2,437  
 
           
 
  $ 12,697     $ 11,589  
 
           
NOTE 4 — EARNINGS PER SHARE
     A reconciliation of the denominators used in computing per share net income, or EPS, is as follows (in thousands):
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
Numerator:
                               
Net income (loss)
  $ (609 )   $ 3,173     $ (2,287 )   $ 1,048  
 
                               
Denominator:
                               
Denominator for basic net income (loss) per share - weighted average common stock outstanding
    40,661       40,002       40,515       37,056  
Dilutive common stock equivalents — common stock options and awards
          2,171             1,901  
 
                       
 
                               
Denominator for diluted net income (loss) per share - weighted average common stock outstanding and dilutive common stock equivalents
    40,661       42,173       40,515       38,957  
 
                               
Basic net income (loss) per share
  $ (0.01 )   $ 0.08     $ (0.06 )   $ 0.03  
Diluted net income (loss) per share
  $ (0.01 )   $ 0.08     $ (0.06 )   $ 0.03  
     Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) for the period by the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. Restricted stock awards, or RSAs, restricted stock units, or RSUs, and stock options to acquire 1.1 million and 2.3 million shares for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and 1.1 million and 2.0 million shares, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were excluded from the computations of diluted EPS because the effect of including the RSAs, RSUs, and stock options would have been anti-dilutive.

7


Table of Contents

LUMINEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 5 — STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
     The Company’s stock option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was as follows:
                 
            Weighted  
            Average  
    Shares     Exercise  
Stock Options   (in thousands)     Price  
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
    2,771     $ 11.96  
Granted
    167       16.31  
Exercised
    (38 )     9.59  
Cancelled or expired
    (70 )     17.81  
 
           
Outstanding at September 30, 2009
    2,830     $ 12.10  
     The Company had $1.9 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to stock options at September 30, 2009 that are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.5 years.
     The Company’s restricted shares activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was as follows:
                 
            Weighted  
            Average  
    Shares     Grant-Date  
Restricted Stock Awards   (in thousands)     Fair Value  
Non-vested at December 31, 2008
    1,197     $ 15.39  
Granted
    473       16.18  
Vested
    (450 )     14.70  
Cancelled or expired
    (101 )     16.04  
 
           
Non-vested at September 30, 2009
    1,119     $ 15.94  
         
    Shares  
Restricted Stock Units   (in thousands)  
Non-vested at December 31, 2008
    280  
Granted
    353  
Vested
    (11 )
Cancelled or expired
    (77 )
 
     
Non-vested at September 30, 2009
    545  
     As of September 30, 2009, there was $18.0 million and $6.4 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to RSAs and RSUs, respectively. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.3 years for the RSAs and 2.7 years for the RSUs.
          The following are the stock-based compensation costs recognized in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations (in thousands):
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2009     2008     2009     2008  
Cost of revenue
  $ 204     $ 140     $ 493     $ 374  
Research and development
    381       312       923       812  
Selling, general and administrative
    1,646       1,329       4,401       4,016  
 
                       
Total stock-based compensation costs
  $ 2,231     $ 1,781     $ 5,817     $ 5,202  

8


Table of Contents

LUMINEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 6 — SEGMENT INFORMATION
     Management has determined that the Company has two segments for financial reporting purposes: the Technology Segment and the Assay Segment. The accounting principles of the segments are the same as those described in the Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. Following is selected segment information for and as of the periods indicated (in thousands).
                                                 
    Three Months Ended   Three Months Ended
    September 30, 2009   September 30, 2008
    Technology   Assay           Technology   Assay    
    Segment   Segment   Consolidated   Segment   Segment   Consolidated
Revenues from external customers
  $ 22,031     $ 7,087     $ 29,118     $ 22,582     $ 6,315     $ 28,897  
Depreciation and amortization
    1,102       1,014     $ 2,116       829       992     $ 1,821  
Segment profit (loss)
    558       (1,167 )   $ (609 )     3,590       (417 )   $ 3,173  
Segment assets
    147,130       72,885     $ 220,015       141,670       69,940     $ 211,610  
     Following is selected segment information for and as of the periods indicated (in thousands).
                                                 
    Nine Months Ended   Nine Months Ended
    September 30, 2009   September 30, 2008
    Technology   Assay           Technology   Assay    
    Segment   Segment   Consolidated   Segment   Segment   Consolidated
Revenues from external customers
  $ 62,595     $ 19,881     $ 82,476     $ 61,496     $ 14,754     $ 76,250  
Depreciation and amortization
    3,130       2,865     $ 5,995       2,404       2,721     $ 5,125  
Segment profit (loss)
    3,915       (6,202 )   $ (2,287 )     6,900       (5,852 )   $ 1,048  
Segment assets
    147,130       72,885     $ 220,015       141,670       69,940     $ 211,610  
NOTE 7 — INCOME TAXES
     At the end of each interim reporting period, an estimate is made of the effective tax rate expected to be applicable for the full year. The estimated full year’s effective tax rate is used to determine the income tax rate for each applicable interim reporting period. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the results of operations in the period of the enactment date. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was 10.13%. The Company’s tax expense was less than the Federal statutory rate primarily as a result of the utilization of a portion of the Company’s U.S. deferred tax assets which had been subjected to a valuation allowance.
     The Company or one of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, Canada, China, Japan and various states. Due to net operating losses, the U.S. tax returns dating back to 1996 can still be reviewed by the taxing authorities. With respect to Canada, tax returns dating back to 2003 can still be reviewed by the authorities. The Company does not expect any material changes to the estimated amount of liability associated with its uncertain tax positions within the next twelve months. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, there were no material changes to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in the provision for income taxes.

9


Table of Contents

LUMINEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 8 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
     On January 16, 2008, Luminex Corporation and Luminex Molecular Diagnostics, Inc. (“LMD”) were served with a complaint, filed by The Research Foundation of the State University of New York (“SUNY”) in Federal District Court for the Northern District of New York, alleging, among other claims, that LMD breached its license agreement with SUNY by failing to pay royalties allegedly owed under the agreement. The complaint sought an undetermined amount of damages as well as injunctive relief. On March 27, 2009, Luminex and LMD settled the pending litigation with SUNY. As part of the settlement, SUNY received a one time cash payment of approximately $4.4 million, which represents all amounts owed by Luminex as part of the settlement. The cash payment was made by Luminex in exchange for resolution of the dispute between the companies and a complete release of all claims by SUNY against Luminex and correspondingly a complete release of all claims by Luminex against SUNY. All other terms of the agreement are confidential. The parties have formally dismissed the lawsuit, as required by the applicable settlement agreement.
     On June 19, 2009, Luminex terminated a long-term supply contract related to its FlexmiR® product line. A payment of $1 million was made in June 2009 related to this termination. This payment included a purchase of $220,000 of inventory.
     On July 24, 2009, the Company notified Abbott Molecular Inc. of the Company’s intent to convert its right to distribute Luminex’s xTAG® Respiratory Viral Panel (“RVP”) from exclusive to non-exclusive on a worldwide basis under the Distribution Agreement, dated February 1, 2008, between Abbott Molecular and LMD.  On September 11, 2009, Abbott Molecular Inc. notified the Company that it intended to exercise its right to seek arbitration under the Distribution Agreement. Among other matters, Abbott is disputing LMD’s right to terminate Abbott’s exclusive right to distribute RVP under the Agreement.  Irrespective of the result of the arbitration, Abbott will continue to maintain the right to distribute RVP.  The binding arbitration is currently scheduled for December 14, 2009.  At this time, the Company cannot assess the probability of the various potential outcomes of this arbitration.
NOTE 9 — RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
     On June 3, 2009, the FASB approved the “FASB Accounting Standards Codification”, or the Codification, as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or GAAP, in the United States. The Codification is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Codification is the single source of authoritative accounting principles to be applied by all nongovernmental U.S. entities. All other accounting literature not included in the Codification is considered non-authoritative. The adoption of the Codification did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
     The FASB recently amended its guidance on the information that a reporting entity must provide in its financial reports about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a transferor’s continuing involvement in transferred financial assets. Specifically, among other aspects, the new guidance amends previous guidance related to the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity, variable interest entities that are qualifying special-purpose entities and the financial-components approach. The new guidance is effective for transfer of financial assets occurring on or after January 1, 2010. The Company has not determined the effect that the adoption of the new guidance will have on its financial position or results of operations but the effect will generally be limited to future transactions. Historically, the Company has not had any material transfers of financial assets. Additionally, the FASB recently amended its guidance surrounding a company’s analysis to determine whether its variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. The primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity is the enterprise that has both (1) the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. This new guidance also requires ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. The guidance is effective for all variable interest entities and relationships with variable interest entities existing as of January 1, 2010. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have an impact on its financial position or results of operations.

10


Table of Contents

LUMINEX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
     In October 2009, the FASB updated its revenue recognition guidance, amending the criteria for separating consideration in multiple-deliverable arrangements. The amendments establish a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable. The selling price used for each deliverable will be based on vendor-specific objective evidence if available, third–party evidence if vendor-specific objective evidence is not available, or estimated selling price if neither vendor-specific objective evidence nor third-party evidence is available. The amendments will eliminate the residual method of allocation and require that arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method. The relative selling price method allocates any discount in the arrangement proportionally to each deliverable on the basis of each deliverable’s selling price. This update will be effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the requirements of this update and have not yet determined the impact on our consolidated financial statements.
     In October 2009, the FASB updated its software guidance, changing the accounting model for revenue arrangements that include both tangible products and software elements. Tangible products containing software components and nonsoftware components that function together to deliver the tangible product’s essential functionality are no longer within the scope of the software revenue guidance. In addition, the amendments require that hardware components of a tangible product containing software components always be excluded from the software revenue guidance. This update will be effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the requirements of this update and have not yet determined the impact on our consolidated financial statements.

11


Table of Contents

ITEM 2.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
     The following information should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes included in Part I, Item 1 of this Report, and the “Risk Factors” included in Part II Item 1A of this Report and Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “2008 10-K”).
SAFE HARBOR CAUTIONARY STATEMENT
     This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains statements that are forward-looking statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements give our current expectations of forecasts of future events. All statements other than statements of current or historical fact contained in this report, including statements regarding our future financial position, business strategy, new products, assay sales, budgets, liquidity, cash flows, projected costs, litigation costs, including the costs or impact of any litigation settlements or orders, regulatory approvals or the impact of any laws or regulations applicable to us, and plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “should,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “projects,” “will,” and similar expressions, as they relate to us, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are based on our current plans and actual future activities, and our financial condition and results of operations may be materially different from those set forth in the forward-looking statements as a result of known or unknown risks and uncertainties, including, among other things:
    risks and uncertainties relating to market demand and acceptance of our products and technology;
 
    dependence on strategic partners for development, commercialization and distribution of products;
 
    the impact of the ongoing uncertainty in global finance markets and changes in government funding, including its effects on the capital spending policies of our partners and end-users and their ability to finance purchases of our products;
 
    concentration of our revenue in a limited number of strategic partners, some of which may be experiencing decreased demand for their products utilizing or incorporating our technology and budget or finance constraints in the current economic environment or periodic variability in their purchasing patterns or practices;
 
    fluctuations in quarterly results due to a lengthy and unpredictable sales cycle, bulk purchases of consumables, fluctuations in product mix, and the seasonal nature of some of our assay products;
 
    our ability to scale manufacturing operations and manage operating expenses, gross margins and inventory levels;
 
    potential shortages, or increases in costs, of components;
 
    competition;
 
    our ability to successfully launch new products;
 
    the timing of regulatory approvals;
 
    the implementation, including any modification, of our strategic operating plans;
 
    the uncertainty regarding the outcome or expense of any litigation brought against or initiated by us;
 
    risks relating to our foreign operations; and
 
    risks and uncertainties associated with implementing our acquisition strategy including our ability to obtain financing, our ability to integrate acquired companies or selected assets into our consolidated business operations, and the ability to recognize the benefits of our acquisitions.

12


Table of Contents

     Many of these risks, uncertainties and other factors are beyond our control and are difficult to predict. Any or all of our forward-looking statements in this report may turn out to be inaccurate. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy and financial needs. New factors could also emerge from time to time that could adversely affect our business. The forward-looking statements herein can be affected by inaccurate assumptions we might make or by known or unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including the risks, uncertainties and assumptions outlined above and described in the section titled “Risk Factors” below and in the 2008 10-K. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this report may not occur and actual results could differ materially from those anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements. When you consider these forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind these risk factors and other cautionary statements in this report and our other annual and periodic reports.
     Our forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained in this report.
     Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to “Luminex,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Luminex Corporation and its subsidiaries.
OVERVIEW
     We develop, manufacture and sell proprietary biological testing technologies and products with applications throughout the life sciences and diagnostics industries. These industries depend on a broad range of tests, called bioassays, to perform diagnostic tests, discover and develop new drugs and identify genes. Our xMAP® (Multi-Analyte Profiling) technology, an open architecture, multiplexing technology, allows simultaneous analysis of up to 500 bioassays from a small sample volume, typically a single drop of fluid, by reading biological tests on the surface of microscopic polystyrene beads called microspheres. xMAP technology combines this miniaturized liquid array bioassay capability with small lasers, digital signal processors and proprietary software to create a system offering advantages in speed, precision, flexibility and cost. Our xMAP technology is currently being used within various segments of the life sciences industry which includes the fields of drug discovery and development, clinical diagnostics, genetic analysis, bio-defense, protein analysis and biomedical research.
     Our end-user customers and partners, which include laboratory professionals performing research, clinical laboratories performing tests on patients as ordered by a physician and other laboratories, have a fundamental need to perform high quality testing as efficiently as possible. Luminex has adopted a business model built around strategic partnerships. We have licensed our xMAP technology to partner companies, which in turn develop products that incorporate the xMAP technology into products that the partners sell to end-users. Luminex develops and manufactures the proprietary xMAP laboratory instrumentation and the proprietary xMAP microspheres and sells these products to its partners. Our partners then sell xMAP instrumentation and xMAP-based reagent consumable products, which run on the instrumentation, to the end-user laboratory. Luminex was founded on this model, and our success to date has been due to this model. As of September 30, 2009, Luminex had approximately 62 strategic partners and these partners have purchased from Luminex over 6,500 xMAP-based systems. Of the 62 strategic partners, 39 have released commercialized reagent-based products utilizing our technology.
     Beginning in 2006, we began developing proprietary assays. This development was supplemented in 2007 by our acquisition of Tm Bioscience, which we named Luminex Molecular Diagnostics, or LMD. Our Assay Segment focuses on the molecular diagnostics market and certain specialty markets.

13


Table of Contents

     Luminex has several forms of revenue that result from our business model:
    System revenue is generated from the sale of our xMAP systems and peripherals. Currently, system revenue is derived from the sale of the Luminex 100™ and 200™ analyzers, our FLEXMAP 3D™ system, optional XY Platform and Sheath Delivery Systems.
 
    Consumable revenue is generated from the sale of our dyed polystyrene microspheres and sheath fluid. Our larger commercial and development partners often purchase these consumables in bulk to minimize the number of incoming qualification events and to allow for longer development and production runs.
 
    Royalty revenue is generated when a partner sells a kit incorporating our proprietary microspheres to an end user or when a partner utilizes a kit to provide a testing result to a user. End users can be facilities such as testing labs, development facilities and research facilities that purchase prepared kits and have specific testing needs, or testing service companies that provide assay results to pharmaceutical research companies or physicians.
 
    Assay revenue is generated from the sale of our kits which are a combination of chemical and biological reagents and our proprietary bead technology used to perform diagnostic and research assays on samples.
 
    Service revenue is generated when a partner or other owner of a system purchases a service contract from us after the standard warranty has expired. Service contract revenue is amortized over the life of the contract and the costs associated with those contracts are recognized as incurred.
 
    Other revenue consists of items such as training, shipping, parts sales, license revenue, grant revenue, contract research and development fees, milestone revenue and other items that individually amount to less than 5% of total revenue.
Third Quarter 2009 Highlights
    Consolidated revenue of $29.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, representing a 1% increase over revenue for the third quarter of 2008
 
    Consolidated gross profit margin of 64% compared with third quarter 2008 gross profit margin of 68%
 
    System shipments of 259 including 11 shipments of FLEXMAP 3D, resulting in cumulative life-to-date shipments of 6,514; this represents an 8% increase in the number of system shipments and an 18% increase in system sales over the third quarter of 2008
 
    Higher margin items (assays, consumables and royalty revenues) of $17.0 million or 58% of third quarter 2009 revenue
 
    Received 510(k) clearance from the FDA for a new cystic fibrosis test: the xTAG Cystic Fibrosis 39 Kit v2
 
    Establishment of an office in Tokyo, Japan to provide commercial support and service to customers and partners in the area
 
    Received FDA clearance for an update to the xTAG(R) Respiratory Viral Panel package insert
 
    Our partners reported over $74 million of royalty bearing end user sales on xMAP technology for the quarter, a 17% increase over the third quarter of 2008

14


Table of Contents

     We have experienced the fifth sequential quarter of consumable revenue decline since the third quarter of 2008. After thorough analysis of the decline, we have identified several factors contributing to the decline, none of which individually appear to be systemic in nature or indicative of future results. Overall, the decline manifested itself through a decline in activity at varying times from our largest, bulk purchasing partners. In the third quarter of 2008, fourth quarter of 2008, first quarter of 2009, second quarter of 2009, and third quarter of 2009 we had bulk purchases totaling $7.0 million, $6.8 million, $6.1 million, $5.5 million and $4.3 million in consumables, respectively. Alternatively, non bulk consumable sales varied within a much smaller range between $1.2 million and $1.8 million with the largest amount of non bulk sales taking place in the third quarter of 2009 with $1.8 million of consumables. We believe the decrease in bulk purchases can be attributed to several factors including (1) purchases in prior periods of significant volumes of consumables related to the conversion of our partners’ assay product portfolios from carboxyl beads to magnetic beads primarily in anticipation of the release of our new MagPix™ system in 2010; (2) volume reductions in bulk purchases from several of our partners as a result of a reduction in total consumable needs subsequent to the regulatory clearance and commercialization phases of development of new products and transitioning product lines; (3) increased attention on inventory management by our partners during 2009 as a result of the macro economic climate and (4) an increase in our partners’ focus on generating current revenue from commercialized products. The success of our partners’ commercialization efforts is reflected in the rising level of royalties and reported royalty bearing sales during the period over which the consumable revenue has declined. Reported royalty bearing sales have increased by 17% from $63.6 million in the third quarter of 2008 to $74.6 million in the third quarter of 2009.
Segment Information
     Luminex has two reportable segments: the Technology Segment and the Assay Segment. The Technology Segment, which is our base business, consists of system sales to partners, raw bead sales, royalties, service and support of the technology, and other miscellaneous items. The Assay Segment is primarily involved in the development and sale of assays on xMAP technology for use on Luminex’s installed base of systems.
Future Operations
     We expect continued revenue growth to be driven by continued adoption of our core technology coupled with assay introduction and commercialization by the Assay Segment and our partners. We anticipate continued revenue concentration in our high margin items (assays, consumables and royalties) contributing to favorable, but variable gross margin percentages. Additionally, we believe that a sustained investment in R&D is necessary in order to meet the needs of our marketplace and provide a sustainable new product pipeline. Therefore, we estimate that R&D expenditures will increase in absolute dollars over time, but decrease as a percentage of total revenue towards our long term target of 15% of revenue. We could experience volatility in R&D expenses as a percentage of revenue on a quarterly basis.
     We expect our primary challenges throughout the remainder of 2009 to be:
    the timing effect of the ongoing uncertainty in global finance markets and changes in government funding on planned purchases by end users;
 
    continued adoption and development of partner products incorporating Luminex technology;
 
    commercialization, regulatory acceptance and market adoption of output from the Assay Segment; and
 
    the expansion and enhancement of our installed base and leadership position within our identified target market segments.

15


Table of Contents

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
     The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial statements. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
     Management believes there have been no significant changes during the quarter ended September 30, 2009 to the items that we disclosed as our critical accounting policies and estimates in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the 2008 10-K.

16


Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
     Selected consolidated financial data for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 is as follows (dollars in thousands):
                 
    Three Months Ended
    September 30,
    2009   2008
Revenue
  $ 29,118     $ 28,897  
Gross profit
  $ 18,771     $ 19,554  
Gross profit margin percentage
    64 %     68 %
Operating expenses
  $ 19,283     $ 16,573  
Income (loss) from operations
  $ (512 )   $ 2,981  
     Total revenue increased to $29.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from $28.9 million for the comparable period in 2008. We experienced revenue growth in system placements, due to the return of demand for our LX 200 instrument as capital budgets became available and the introduction of our 3D product in the second quarter of 2009 and an increase in assay and royalty revenue as a result of the success of our Cystic Fibrosis (CF) and Respiratory Viral Panel (RVP) product lines. This revenue growth was largely offset by a decrease in consumable sales. System sales for the third quarter of 2009 increased to 259 systems from 239 systems for the corresponding prior year period bringing total system sales since inception to 6,514 as of September 30, 2009.
     A breakdown of revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 is as follows (in thousands):
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    September 30,  
    2009     2008  
System sales
  $ 9,166     $ 7,788  
Consumable sales
    6,062       8,340  
Assay revenue
    6,199       5,897  
Royalty revenue
    4,699       3,865  
Service contracts
    1,491       1,429  
Other revenue
    1,501       1,578  
 
           
 
  $ 29,118     $ 28,897  
 
           
     We continue to experience revenue concentration in a limited number of strategic partners. Two customers accounted for 27% of consolidated total revenue in the third quarter of 2009 (14% and 13%, respectively). For comparative purposes, these same two customers accounted for 35% of total revenue (17% and 18%, respectively) in the third quarter of 2008. The decrease in percentage of total revenue represented by our two largest customers is due to the decrease in the dollar amount of bulk purchases by these two customers due to the varying consumable needs during the regulatory clearance and commercialization phases of development of our partners’ products in a new market and the economic environment as discussed in the Overview section above. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of total revenue in this quarter.

17


Table of Contents

     Gross profit margin percentage decreased to 64% for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from 68% for the comparable period in 2008 due to the increase in system sales, a lower margin item, in the three months ended September 30, 2009. The increase in operating expenses from $16.6 million for the third quarter of 2008 to $19.3 million for the third quarter of 2009 is primarily a result of additional personnel costs and the related stock compensation and travel costs associated with the increase in employees and contract employees as headcount has increased from 381 to 423 from September 30, 2008 to September 30, 2009. Net operating income decreased due to the decrease in gross profit margin percentage and the increase in operating expenses. See additional discussions by segment below.
Technology Segment
     Selected financial data for our Technology Segment for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 is as follows (dollars in thousands):
                 
    Three Months Ended
    September 30,
    2009   2008
Revenue
  $ 22,031     $ 22,582  
Gross profit
  $ 13,767     $ 14,541  
Gross profit margin percentage
    62 %     64 %
Operating expenses
  $ 13,218     $ 11,313  
Income from operations
  $ 549     $ 3,228  
     Revenue. Total revenue for our Technology Segment decreased by 2% to $22.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from $22.6 million for the comparable period in 2008. The decrease in revenue was primarily attributable to a decrease in consumable sales offset by an increase in system sales and royalty revenue. Two customers accounted for 35% of total Technology Segment revenue in the third quarter of 2009 (19% and 16%, respectively). For comparative purposes, these same two customers accounted for 44% of total Technology Segment revenue 21% and 23%, respectively) in the third quarter of 2008. The decrease in percentage of total revenue represented by our two largest customers is due to a decrease in the dollar amount of bulk purchases by our two largest customers as discussed in the Overview section above.
     A breakdown of revenue in the Technology Segment for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 is as follows (in thousands):
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    September 30,  
    2009     2008  
System sales
  $ 8,501     $ 7,483  
Consumable sales
    6,052       8,328  
Royalty revenue
    4,699       3,865  
Service contracts
    1,419       1,403  
Other revenue
    1,360       1,503  
 
           
 
  $ 22,031     $ 22,582  
 
           
     System and peripheral component sales increased by 14% to $8.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from $7.5 million for the comparable period of 2008. The Technology Segment sold 243 of the 259 total system sales in the three months ended September 30, 2009. For the three months ended September 30, 2009, five of our partners accounted for 194, or 80%, of total Technology Segment systems sold for the period. In the three months ended September 30, 2008, the top five partners purchased 178, or 77%, of total Technology Segment system sales.

18


Table of Contents

     Consumable sales, comprised of microspheres and sheath fluid, decreased 27% to $6.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from $8.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. This is primarily the result of a decrease in bulk purchases as described in the Overview above. A bulk purchase is defined as the purchase of $100,000 or more of consumables in a quarter. During the three months ended September 30, 2009, we had 13 bulk purchases of consumables totaling approximately $4.3 million as compared with 14 bulk purchases totaling approximately $7.0 million in the three months ended September 30, 2008. Partners who reported royalty bearing sales accounted for $4.2 million, or 69%, of total consumable sales for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $7.7 million, or 92%, of total consumable sales for the three months ended September 30, 2008.
     Royalty revenue, which results when our partners sell products or services incorporating our technology, increased by 22% to $4.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared with $3.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. We believe this is primarily the result of our increased cumulative instrument placements, menu expansion, and utilization of our partners’ assays on our technology. We expect modest fluctuations in the number of commercial partners submitting royalties quarter to quarter based upon the varying contractual terms, consolidations among partners, differing reporting and payment requirements, and the addition of new partners. For the three months ended September 30, 2009, we had 30 commercial partners submitting royalties as compared to 32 for the three months ended September 30, 2008. One of our partners reported royalties totaling approximately $1.7 million or 36% of total royalties for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 compared to $1.4 million or 36% for the quarter ended September 30, 2008. Two other customers reported royalties totaling approximately $1.2 million or 25% (14% and 11%, respectively) of total royalties for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of total royalty revenue for the quarter ended September 30, 2009. Total royalty bearing sales reported to us by our partners were over $74 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 compared with over $63 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2008.
     Service contracts revenue, comprised of extended warranty contracts earned ratably over the term of a contract, remained flat at $1.4 million for the third quarter of 2009 compared to $1.4 million for the third quarter of 2008. At September 30, 2009 and 2008, we had 1,053 and 981 Luminex systems, respectively, covered under extended service agreements.
     Other revenues, comprised of training revenue, shipping revenue, miscellaneous part sales, amortized license fees, reagent sales, and grant revenue, decreased by 9% to $1.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from $1.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. This decrease is primarily the result of a decrease in shipping revenue and miscellaneous part sales.
     Gross profit. The gross profit margin percentage (gross profit as a percentage of total revenue) for the Technology Segment decreased to 62% for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from 64% for the three months ended September 30, 2008. Gross profit for the Technology Segment decreased to $13.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to $14.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. The decrease in gross profit margin percentage was primarily attributable to changes in revenue mix between our higher and lower gross margin items. System sales, a lower margin item, comprised 39% of total Technology Segment revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to 33% for the three months ended September 30, 2008. Consumables, one of our higher margin items, comprised $6.1 million, or 27%, of Technology Segment revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and $8.3 million, or 37%, of Technology Segment revenue for the quarter ended September 30, 2008. The decrease in gross profit was primarily attributable to the overall decrease in revenue coupled with the decrease in gross margin.
     Research and development expense. Research and development expenses for the Technology Segment increased to $3.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from $2.6 million for the comparable period in 2008. The increase was primarily related to increases in materials and supplies for the expansion and development of our systems and applications for use on our platforms as well as additional personnel costs related to the appointment of our new Vice President of Systems Research and Development in the third quarter of 2009.

19


Table of Contents

     Selling, general and administrative expense. Selling, general and administrative expense for the Technology Segment increased to $10.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from $8.7 million for the comparable period in 2008. The increase was primarily related to additional personnel costs and the related stock compensation and travel costs associated with the increase in selling, general, and administrative employees and contract employees of the Technology Segment to 111 at September 30, 2009 from 97 at September 30, 2008.
     Other income, net. Other income decreased to $144,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from $490,000 for the comparable period in 2008. The decrease is primarily due to the decrease in the average rate earned on our current invested balances from 2.0% at September 30, 2008 to 0.5% at September 30, 2009. This decrease is the result of an overall decrease in market rates compared to the prior year period.
Assay Segment
     Selected financial data for our Assay Segment for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 is as follows (dollars in thousands):
                 
    Three Months Ended
    September 30,
    2009   2008
Revenue
  $ 7,087     $ 6,315  
Gross profit
  $ 5,004     $ 5,013  
Gross profit margin percentage
    71 %     79 %
Operating expenses
  $ 6,065     $ 5,260  
Loss from operations
  $ (1,061 )   $ (247 )
     A breakdown of revenue in the Assay Segment for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 is as follows (in thousands):
                 
    Three Months Ended  
    September 30,  
    2009     2008  
System sales
  $ 665     $ 305  
Consumable sales
    10       12  
Assay revenue
    6,199       5,897  
Service contracts
    72       26  
Other revenue
    141       75  
 
           
 
  $ 7,087     $ 6,315  
 
           
     Revenue. Total revenue for our Assay Segment increased by 12% to $7.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from $6.3 million for the comparable period in 2008. The increase in revenue was primarily attributable to an increase in system revenue and assay revenue, driven primarily by increased sales of our RVP product due to the 2009 novel influenza H1N1. The majority of our Assay Segment revenues are generated from the sale of test kits. As a result of the launch of our RVP product in January 2008, our top two products in the third quarter of 2009 were CF and RVP, which represented over 87% of total assay revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The top five customers, by revenue, accounted for 83% of total Assay Segment revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to 71% of total Assay Segment revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2008. In particular, three customers accounted for 67% of total Assay Segment revenue (36%, 18% and 13%, respectively) for the three months ended September 30, 2009. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of total Assay Segment revenue. During the three months ended September 30, 2009, our Assay Segment sold sixteen systems. Other revenue includes shipping revenue and training revenue.

20


Table of Contents

     Gross profit. The gross profit margin percentage (gross profit as a percentage of total revenue) for the Assay Segment decreased to 71% for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from 79% for the three months ended September 30, 2008. Gross profit for the Assay Segment remained flat at $5.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008. The decrease in gross profit margin percentage was primarily attributable to a contractual amendment with a partner resulting in a positive pricing adjustment of $327,000 in the third quarter of 2008 and accelerated amortization of a license agreement related to the termination of a supply contract associated with our FlexmiR product line.
     Research and development expense. Research and development expenses for our Assay Segment were $2.5 million and $1.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase in research and development expenses was primarily due to increased activity for clinical trials and FDA submissions related to our assay development.
     Selling, general and administrative expense. Selling, general and administrative expenses, including the amortization of acquired intangibles, for the Assay Segment were $3.5 million and $3.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 COMPARED TO NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
     Selected consolidated financial data for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 (dollars in thousands):
                 
    Nine Months Ended
    September 30,
    2009   2008
Revenue
  $ 82,476     $ 76,250  
Gross profit
  $ 55,639     $ 51,374  
Gross profit margin percentage
    67 %     67 %
Operating expenses
  $ 53,538     $ 50,175  
Income from operations
  $ 2,101     $ 1,199  
     Total revenue increased by 8% to $82.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $76.3 million for the comparable period in 2008. The increase in revenue was attributable to an increase of $4.9 million in assay revenue in the Assay Segment and continued growth in royalty revenue in the Technology Segment, offset by a decrease in consumable sales. System sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 decreased to 620 systems from 662 systems for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 bringing total system sales since inception to 6,514 as of September 30, 2009.
     A breakdown of revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 is as follows (in thousands):
                 
    Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,  
    2009     2008  
System sales
  $ 21,404     $ 20,733  
Consumable sales
    20,347       23,397  
Assay revenue
    18,164       13,268  
Royalty revenue
    13,524       10,855  
Service contracts
    4,347       3,926  
Other revenue
    4,690       4,071  
 
           
 
  $ 82,476     $ 76,250  
 
           

21


Table of Contents

     We continue to experience revenue concentration in a limited number of strategic partners. Two customers accounted for 29% of consolidated total revenue in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 (17% and 12%, respectively). For comparative purposes, these same two customers accounted for 36% of total revenue (20% and 16%, respectively) in the nine months ended September 30, 2008. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of total revenue in the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Our two largest customers are customers of our Technology Segment. The decrease in percentage of total revenue represented by our two largest customers is the result of the shift in revenue allocation from the Technology Segment to the Assay Segment. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, Assay Segment revenue represented 24% of total revenue, while Assay Segment revenue represented 19% of total revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. In addition, there was a decrease in the dollar amount of bulk purchases by our two largest customers due to the varying consumable needs during the regulatory clearance and commercialization phases of development of our partners’ products and the economic environment as discussed in the Overview section above.
     Gross profit margin percentage remained flat at 67% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008. The increase in operating expenses from $50.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 to $53.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 reflects growth in the Assay Segment, additional personnel costs and the related stock compensation and travel costs associated with the increase in employees and contract employees to 423 at September 30, 2009 from 381 at September 30, 2008, and a payment of $780,000 made related to the termination of a supply contract associated with our FlexmiR product line. We launched our next generation FlexmiR product line in July 2009. This termination is not expected to affect FlexmiR product supply to customers. Net operating income increased as a result of the increase in revenues in 2009. Other income, net decreased to $593,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $629,000 for the comparable period in 2008 due to a decrease in the average rate earned on invested balances offset by $412,000 in costs recorded in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 related to a potential acquisition that did not occur. The average rate earned on current invested balances decreased to 0.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from 2.5% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. This decrease in the average rate earned is the result of an overall decrease in market rates compared to the prior year period. See additional discussions by segment below.
Technology Segment
     Selected financial data for our Technology Segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 is as follows (dollars in thousands):
                 
    Nine Months Ended
    September 30,
    2009   2008
Revenue
  $ 62,595     $ 61,496  
Gross profit
  $ 41,308     $ 40,356  
Gross profit margin percentage
    66 %     66 %
Operating expenses
  $ 35,855     $ 33,768  
Income from operations
  $ 5,453     $ 6,588  
     Revenue. Total revenue for our Technology Segment increased by 2% to $62.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $61.5 million for the comparable period in 2008. The increase in revenue was primarily attributable to an increase in royalty revenue as a result of the continued acceptance and utilization of our technology in the marketplace offset by decreases in consumable sales. Two customers accounted for 38% of total Technology Segment revenue in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 (23% and 15%, respectively). For comparative purposes, these same two customers accounted for 45% of total Technology Segment revenue (25% and 20%, respectively) in the nine months ended September, 30 2008. The decrease in percentage of total revenue represented by our two largest customers is due to a decrease in the dollar amount of bulk purchases by our two largest customers as discussed in the Overview section above.

22


Table of Contents

     A breakdown of revenue in the Technology Segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 is as follows (in thousands):
                 
    Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,  
    2009     2008  
System sales
  $ 20,231     $ 19,506  
Consumable sales
    20,302       23,365  
Royalty revenue
    13,524       10,855  
Service contracts
    4,144       3,888  
Other revenue
    4,394       3,882  
 
           
 
  $ 62,595     $ 61,496  
 
           
     System and peripheral component sales increased by 4% to $20.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $19.5 million for the comparable period of 2008. The Technology Segment sold 591 of the 620 total system sales in the nine months ended September 30, 2009. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, five of our partners accounted for 400, or 68%, of total technology segment system sales for the period. Five of our partners accounted for 455, or 72%, of total technology segment system sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
     Consumable sales decreased by 13% to $20.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $23.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. This is primarily the result of a decrease in the number and average dollar amount of bulk purchases as described in the Overview section above. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we had 37 bulk purchases of consumables totaling approximately $15.8 million, or 78% of total consumable sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as compared with 39 bulk purchases totaling approximately $19.4 million, or 83% of total consumable sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Partners who reported royalty bearing sales accounted for $16.4 million, or 81%, of total consumable sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. As the number of applications available on our platform expands, we anticipate that the overall level of consumable sales, and related bulk purchases, will continue to fluctuate.
     Royalty revenue increased by 25% to $13.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared with $10.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. We believe this is primarily the result of the increased use and acceptance of our technology. We expect modest fluctuations in the number of commercial partners submitting royalties period to period based upon the varying contractual terms, consolidations among partners, differing reporting and payment requirements, and the addition of new partners. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we had 39 commercial partners submitting royalties as compared to 34 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. One of our partners reported royalties totaling approximately $4.6 million or 34% of total royalties for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $3.4 million or 29% of total royalties for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Two other customers reported royalties totaling approximately $3.2 million or 24% (14% and 10%, respectively) of total royalties for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of total royalty revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Total royalty bearing sales reported to us by our partners were over $206 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared with over $172 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and over $238 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.
     Service contracts revenue increased by 7% to $4.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $3.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. This increase is attributable to additional resources allocated to the sale of extended service agreements resulting in increased penetration. At September 30, 2009 and 2008, we had 1,053 and 981 Luminex systems, respectively, covered under extended service agreements.
     Other revenues increased by 13% to $4.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $3.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. This increase is primarily the result of an increase in grant revenue.

23


Table of Contents

     Gross profit. The gross profit margin percentage (gross profit as a percentage of total revenue) for the Technology Segment remained flat at 66% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008. Gross profit for the Technology Segment increased to $41.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to $40.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The increase in gross profit margin percentage was primarily attributable to changes in revenue mix between our higher and lower gross margin items. The increase in gross profit was primarily attributable to the overall increase in revenue. Royalties, one of our higher margin items, comprised $13.5 million, or 22%, of Technology Segment revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and $10.9 million, or 18%, of Technology Segment revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. We anticipate continued fluctuation in gross margin rate and related gross profit for the Technology Segment primarily as a result of variability in partner bulk purchases and absolute number of quarterly system sales.
     Research and development expense. Research and development expenses for the Technology Segment remained at $8.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and for the comparable period in 2008. The number of research and development employees and contract employees for the Technology Segment remained relatively flat at 74 at September 30, 2009 from 73 at September 30, 2008.
     Selling, general and administrative expense. Selling, general and administrative expense for the Technology Segment increased to $27.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $25.8 million for the comparable period in 2008. The increase was primarily related to additional personnel costs and the related stock compensation and travel costs associated with the increase in selling, general, and administrative employees and contract employees of the Technology Segment to 111 at September 30, 2009 from 97 at September 30, 2008.
Assay Segment
     Selected financial data for our Assay Segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 is as follows (dollars in thousands):
                 
    Nine Months Ended
    September 30,
    2009   2008
Revenue
  $ 19,881     $ 14,754  
Gross profit
  $ 14,331     $ 11,018  
Gross profit margin percentage
    72 %     75 %
Operating expenses
  $ 17,683     $ 16,407  
Loss from operations
  $ (3,352 )   $ (5,389 )

24


Table of Contents

     A breakdown of revenue in the Assay Segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 is as follows (in thousands):
                 
    Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,  
    2009     2008  
System sales
  $ 1,173     $ 1,227  
Consumable sales
    45       32  
Assay revenue
    18,164       13,268  
Service contracts
    203       38  
Other revenue
    296       189  
 
           
 
  $ 19,881     $ 14,754  
 
           
     Revenue. Total revenue for our Assay Segment increased by 35% to $19.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $14.8 million for the comparable period in 2008. The increase in revenue was primarily attributable to a 37% increase in assay revenue, driven primarily by increased sales of RVP due to the 2009 novel influenza H1N1. The majority of our Assay Segment revenues are generated from the sale of test kits. Historically, over 70% of our total assay revenue was derived from our CF product line. As a result of the launch of our RVP product in January 2008, our top two products in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 were CF and RVP, which together represented 85% of total assay revenue. The top five customers, by revenue, accounted for 76% of total Assay Segment revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. In particular, three customers accounted for 61% of total assay segment revenue (28%, 18%, and 15%, respectively) for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Three customers accounted for 56% of total assay segment revenue (25%, 21% and 10%, respectively) for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of total Assay Segment revenue. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, our Assay Segment sold 29 systems. Other revenue includes shipping revenue and training revenue.
     Gross profit. The gross profit margin percentage (gross profit as a percentage of total revenue) for the Assay Segment decreased to 72% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from 75% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Gross profit for the Assay Segment increased to $14.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, as compared to $11.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The decrease in gross profit margin percentage was primarily attributable to a contractual amendment with a partner resulting in a positive pricing adjustment of $327,000 in the third quarter of 2008 and accelerated amortization of a license agreement related to the termination of a supply contract associated with our FlexmiR product line. The increase in gross profit was primarily attributable to the overall increase in revenue offset by the decrease in gross margin.
     Research and development expense. Research and development expenses for our Assay Segment were $7.2 million and $5.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase in research and development expenses was primarily related to additional personnel costs and the related stock compensation and travel costs associated with the increase in research and development employees and contract employees of the Assay Segment to 57 at September 30, 2009 from 47 at September 30, 2008.
     Selling, general and administrative expense. Selling, general and administrative expenses, including the amortization of acquired intangibles, for the Assay Segment were $10.4 million and $10.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The slight decrease in selling, general, and administrative expenses is primarily due to a decrease in marketing expenses, outside services and legal fees, offset by a payment of $780,000 made related to the termination of a supply contract associated with our FlexmiR product line. We launched our next generation FlexmiR in July 2009. This termination is not expected to affect FlexmiR product supply to customers.

25


Table of Contents

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2009     2008  
    (in thousands)     (in thousands)  
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 78,740     $ 81,619  
Short-term investments
    16,516       40,501  
Long-term investments
    19,722       2,000  
 
           
 
  $ 114,978     $ 124,120  
 
           
     At September 30, 2009, we held cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, and long-term investments of $115.0 million and had working capital of $113.4 million. At December 31, 2008, we held cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, and long-term investments of $124.1 million and had working capital of $131.5 million. The decrease in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments is primarily attributable to capital expenditures and an increase in our accounts receivable as of September 30, 2009.
     We have funded our operations to date primarily through the issuance of equity securities (in conjunction with an initial public offering in 2000, subsequent option exercises, and our secondary public offering in 2008) and cash generated from operations. Our cash reserves are held directly or indirectly in a variety of short-term, interest-bearing instruments, including government sponsored debt obligations and non-government sponsored debt obligations. We do not have any investments in asset-backed commercial paper, auction rate securities, mortgage backed or sub-prime style investments.
     Cash provided by operating activities was $6.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, compared with cash provided by operating activities of $3.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. Significant items affecting operating cash flows for the three months ended September 30, 2009 were an increase in accounts payable of $1.4 million, depreciation and amortization of $2.1 million and stock-based compensation of $2.2 million.
     Cash provided by investing activities was $6.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, compared with cash used in investing activities of $28.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. In the third quarter of 2009, our purchases of securities decreased as we decided to hold maturing short-term investments in cash and cash equivalents. In addition, our capital expenditures for property, plant, and equipment increased to $3.5 million and $8.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, compared to $0.9 million and $2.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively. The capital expenditures were primarily related to leasehold improvements for additional space leased in the U.S. and the Netherlands, acquisitions of FLEXMAP 3D systems for internal use, and purchases of equipment for our business continuity site.
     Our operating expenses during the three months ended September 30, 2009 were $19.3 million, of which $5.6 million was research and development expense and $13.6 million was selling, general and administrative expense, including the amortization of acquired intangibles. We expect our investment in research and development will increase in absolute dollars, but decrease as a percentage of revenue as a result of our continuing investment in the research and development pipeline to support our strategy and expanded focus on product and platform development. In the longer term, we expect total expense as a percentage of revenue to decrease towards our long term target of 15% of total revenue. We currently expect selling, general, and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue for 2009, excluding the impact of foreign exchange on foreign denominated balances, to be lower than in 2008.

26


Table of Contents

     Our future capital requirements will depend on a number of factors, including our success in developing and expanding markets for our products, payments under possible future strategic arrangements, continued progress of our research and development of potential products, the timing and outcome of regulatory approvals, the need to acquire licenses to new technology, costs associated with strategic acquisitions including integration costs and assumed liabilities, litigation expense, the status of competitive products and potential costs associated with both protecting and defending our intellectual property. We believe, however, that our existing cash and cash equivalents are sufficient to fund our operating expenses, capital equipment requirements and other expected liquidity requirements for the coming twelve months. Factors that could affect this estimate are discussed in the “Safe Harbor Cautionary Statement” of this report and the Risk Factors in our 2008 10-K.
     To the extent capital resources are insufficient to meet future capital requirements we will have to raise additional funds to continue the development and deployment of our technologies or the acquisition of new products or technologies. There can be no assurance that debt or equity funds will be available on favorable terms, if at all, particularly given the current state of the capital markets. To the extent that additional capital is raised through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of those securities could result in dilution to our stockholders. Moreover, incurring debt financing could result in a substantial portion of our operating cash flow being dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on such indebtedness, could render us more vulnerable to competitive pressures and economic downturns and could impose restrictions on our operations. If adequate funds are not available, we may be required to curtail operations significantly or to obtain funds through entering into agreements on unattractive terms.

27


Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations
     As of September 30, 2009, we had approximately $10.6 million in non-cancelable obligations for the following 12 months. These obligations are included in our estimated cash usage described below. The following table reflects our total current non-cancelable obligations by period as of September 30, 2009 (in thousands):
                                         
    Payment Due By Period  
            Less Than                     More Than  
Contractual Obligations   Total     1 Year     1-3 Years     3-5 Years     5 Years  
    (in thousands)  
Non-cancelable rental obligations
  $ 11,119     $ 2,227     $ 4,369     $ 3,617     $ 906  
Non-cancelable purchase obligations (1)
  $ 12,568       7,700       1,348       1,288       2,232  
Long-term debt obligations (2)
  $ 5,247       672       2,050       1,356       1,169  
Capital lease obligations
  $ 27       26       1              
 
                             
 
                                       
Total (3)
  $ 28,961     $ 10,625     $ 7,768     $ 6,261     $ 4,307  
 
                             
 
(1)   Purchase obligations include contractual arrangements in the form of purchase orders primarily as a result of normal inventory purchases or minimum payments due resulting when minimum purchase commitments are not met.
 
(2)   On December 12, 2003, LMD entered into an agreement with the Ministry of Industry of the Government of Canada under which the Government agreed to invest up to Canadian (Cdn) $7.3 million relating to the development of several genetic tests. This agreement was amended in March 2009. Funds were advanced from Technology Partnerships Canada (TPC), a special operating program. The actual payments we received were predicated on eligible expenditures made during the amended project period which ended July 31, 2008. LMD has received Cdn $4.9 million from TPC which is expected to be repaid along with approximately Cdn $1.6 million of imputed interest for a total of approximately Cdn $6.5 million.
 
    LMD has agreed to repay the TPC funding through a royalty on revenues. Royalty payments commenced in 2007 at a rate of 1% of total revenue and at a rate of 2.5% for 2008 and thereafter. Aggregate royalty repayment will continue until total advances plus imputed interest has been repaid or until December 31, 2016, whichever is earlier. The repayment obligation expires on December 31, 2016 and any unpaid balance will be cancelled and forgiven on that date. Should the term of repayment be shorter than expected due to higher than expected assay revenue, the effective interest rate would increase as repayment is accelerated. Repayments denominated in U.S. Dollars are currently projected to be as shown in the table above, but actual future sales generating a repayment obligation will vary from this projection and are subject to the risks and uncertainties described elsewhere in this report, including under “Risk Factors” and “Safe Harbor Cautionary Statement.” The amount due within one year, as shown in the table above, is our estimated repayment amount based on the current projected sales for the full year 2009. Furthermore, payments reflected in U.S. Dollars are subject to adjustment based upon applicable exchange rates as of the reporting date.
 
(3)   Due to the uncertainty with respect to the timing of future cash flows associated with Luminex’s unrecognized tax benefits at September 30, 2009, Luminex is unable to make reasonable reliable estimates of the timing of cash settlement with the respective taxing authority. Therefore, $251,000 of unrecognized tax benefits have been excluded from the contractual obligations table above.

28


Table of Contents

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
     Interest Rate Risk. Our investment portfolio includes cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and long-term investments. Our interest income is sensitive to changes in the general level of domestic interest rates. A 50 basis point fluctuation from average investment returns at September 30, 2009 would yield an approximate 1.4% variance in overall investment return. Due to the types of investments that we hold, we believe that there is currently no material market risk exposure.
     Foreign Currency Risk. As of September 30, 2009, as a result of our foreign operations, we have costs, assets and liabilities that are denominated in foreign currencies, primarily Canadian dollars and to a lesser extent the Euro, Renminbi, and Yen. For example, some fixed asset purchases, certain expenses, and the TPC debt of our Canadian subsidiary, LMD, are denominated in Canadian dollars while sales of products are primarily denominated in U.S. dollars. All transactions in our Netherlands and Japanese subsidiaries are denominated in Euros and Yen, respectively. All transactions, with the exception of our initial capital investment, in our Chinese subsidiary are denominated in Renminbi. As a consequence, movements in exchange rates could cause our foreign currency denominated expenses to fluctuate as a percentage of net revenue, affecting our profitability and cash flows. A significant majority of our revenues are denominated in U.S. dollars. The impact of foreign exchange on foreign denominated balances will vary in relation to changes between the U.S. and Canadian Dollar, Euro, Yen, and Renminbi exchange rates. A 10% change in these exchange rates in relation to the U.S. dollar would result in an immaterial foreign exchange impact. As a result of our efforts to expand globally, in the future we will be exposed to additional foreign currency risk in multiple currencies; however, at this time, our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations is not material.
     In addition, the indirect effect of fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates could have a material adverse effect on our business financial condition and results of operations. For example currency exchange rate fluctuations could affect international demand for our products. In addition, interest rate fluctuations could affect our customers’ buying patterns. Furthermore, interest rate and currency exchange rate fluctuations may broadly influence the United States and foreign economies resulting in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. As a result, we cannot give any assurance as to the effect that future changes in foreign currency rates will have on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Aggregate foreign currency transaction loss of $57,000 was included in determining our consolidated results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2009.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
     We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act), which are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. Based on the evaluation and criteria of these disclosure controls and procedures, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
     There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(d) during the quarter ended September 30, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

29


Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
     On July 24, 2009, we notified Abbott Molecular Inc. of our intent to convert its right to distribute Luminex’s xTAG® Respiratory Viral Panel (“RVP”) from exclusive to non-exclusive on a worldwide basis under the Distribution Agreement, dated February 1, 2008, between Abbott Molecular and LMD.  On September 11, 2009, Abbott Molecular Inc. notified us that it intended to exercise its right to seek arbitration under the Distribution Agreement. Among other matters, Abbott is disputing LMD’s right to terminate Abbott’s exclusive right to distribute RVP under the Agreement.  Irrespective of the result of the arbitration, Abbott will continue to maintain the right to distribute RVP.  The binding arbitration is currently scheduled for December 14, 2009.  At this time, we cannot assess the probability of the various potential outcomes of this arbitration.
     When and if it appears probable in management’s judgment that we will incur monetary damages or other costs in connection with any claims or proceedings, and such costs can be reasonably estimated, liabilities will be recorded in the financial statements and charges will be recorded against earnings. Though there can be no assurances, our management believes that the resolution of existing routine matters and other incidental claims, taking into account accruals and insurance, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
     Reference is made to the factors set forth under the caption “Safe Harbor Cautionary Statement” in Part I, Item 2 of this report and other risk factors described in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, which are incorporated herein by reference. There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
     The stock repurchase activity for the third quarter of 2009 was as follows:
                                 
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
                    Total Number of Shares   Appromixate Dollar Value of
    Total Number of   Average Price   Purchased as Part of   Shares that May Yet Be
    Shares   Paid per Share   Publicly Announced   Purchased Under the Plans or
Period   Purchased   (1)($)   Plans or Programs   Programs
 
07/01/09 - 07/31/09
    650       17.70              
08/01/09 - 08/31/09
    16,257       17.71              
09/01/09 - 09/30/09
    72       18.13              
 
Total Third Quarter
    16,979       17.71              
 
 
(1)   Shares purchased are attributable to the withholding of shares by Luminex to satisfy the payment of tax obligations related to the vesting of restricted shares.

30


Table of Contents

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
     The following exhibits are filed herewith:
     
Exhibit    
Number   Description of Documents
 
   
31.1
  Certification by CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
31.2
  Certification by CFO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
32.1
  Certification by CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
32.2
  Certification of CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
         
          Date: November 5, 2009  LUMINEX CORPORATION
 
 
  By:   /s/ Harriss T. Currie    
    Harriss T. Currie   
    Vice President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)   
 
     
  By:   /s/ Patrick J. Balthrop, Sr.    
    Patrick J. Balthrop, Sr.   
    President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)   
 

S-1


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX
     
Exhibit    
Number   Description of Documents
 
   
31.1
  Certification by CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
31.2
  Certification by CFO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
32.1
  Certification by CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
32.2
  Certification of CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

S-2