10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number: 001-33876
Athersys, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
20-4864095 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
3201 Carnegie Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio
|
|
44115-2634 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (216) 431-9900
Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report: Not Applicable
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company þ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act): Yes o No þ
The number of outstanding shares of the registrants common stock, $0.001 par value, as of October
31, 2009 was 18,929,333.
ATHERSYS INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements. |
Athersys, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Note) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
9,208 |
|
|
$ |
12,552 |
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
9,621 |
|
|
|
15,460 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
Receivable from Angiotech |
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
Investment interest receivable |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
19,791 |
|
|
|
29,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
3,604 |
|
|
|
3,601 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
Equipment, net |
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
701 |
|
Equity investments and other |
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
24,368 |
|
|
$ |
33,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
852 |
|
|
$ |
1,498 |
|
Accrued compensation and related benefits |
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
Accrued expenses and other |
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,653 |
|
|
|
2,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, at stated value; 10,000,000 shares authorized, and no shares
issued and outstanding at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, and 18,929,333
shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2009 and 18,927,988 at
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
211,416 |
|
|
|
209,895 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(188,823 |
) |
|
|
(178,471 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
22,715 |
|
|
|
31,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
24,368 |
|
|
$ |
33,877 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
Athersys, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
License fees |
|
$ |
167 |
|
|
$ |
885 |
|
|
$ |
636 |
|
|
$ |
1,728 |
|
Grant revenue |
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
1,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
1,290 |
|
|
|
2,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
2,704 |
|
|
|
4,730 |
|
|
|
7,868 |
|
|
|
12,782 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
1,189 |
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
3,928 |
|
|
|
4,108 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
3,951 |
|
|
|
6,025 |
|
|
|
11,971 |
|
|
|
17,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
|
|
(3,467 |
) |
|
|
(4,747 |
) |
|
|
(10,681 |
) |
|
|
(14,202 |
) |
Interest income and other |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
1,016 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(3,380 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,493 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,352 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,279 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net loss
per common share
attributable to common
stockholders |
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.24 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.55 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.70 |
) |
Weighted average shares
outstanding, basic and
diluted |
|
|
18,928,193 |
|
|
|
18,927,988 |
|
|
|
18,928,057 |
|
|
|
18,927,988 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Athersys, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(10,352 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,279 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
Gain on sale of fixed assets |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
1,520 |
|
|
|
1,404 |
|
Provision on note receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
Expense related to warrants issued to lenders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
Amortization of premium (discount) on
available-for-sale securities and other |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
Receivable from Angiotech |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
(180 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(777 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(661 |
) |
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(8,963 |
) |
|
|
(12,536 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
(7,634 |
) |
|
|
(21,701 |
) |
Maturities of available-for-sale securities |
|
|
13,300 |
|
|
|
37,999 |
|
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Purchase of securities of cost-method investee |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchase of equipment |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(486 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
5,619 |
|
|
|
15,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,800 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,800 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(3,344 |
) |
|
|
1,500 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period |
|
|
12,552 |
|
|
|
13,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period |
|
$ |
9,208 |
|
|
$ |
14,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
Athersys, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Background and Basis of Presentation
We are a biopharmaceutical company engaged in the discovery and development of therapeutic products
in one business segment. Our operations consist primarily of research and product development
activities.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. The accompanying financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim
financial information and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, since they are interim
statements, the accompanying financial statements do not include all of the information and notes
required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The accompanying financial statements reflect
all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, that are, in the opinion of
management, necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and results of operations for
the interim periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a
full year.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Our critical accounting policies, estimates and assumptions are described in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, which is
included below in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentations.
2. New Accounting Standards
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued guidance (issued as EITF
Issue No. 07-1) related to accounting for collaborative arrangements, now referred to as Accounting
Standards Codification (ASC) FASB ASC Topic 808. The effective date of the guidance was January
1, 2009 for calendar year companies with retrospective application required for all periods
presented for collaborative arrangements existing as of the effective date. FASB ASC Topic 808
requires certain disclosures related to collaborative arrangements where parties are active
participants and exposed to significant risks and rewards dependent on the commercial success of
the activity. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on our financial
statements because our accounting for our collaborative agreement was consistent with the
standards provisions.
In May 2008, the FASB issued guidance (issued as Staff Position APB 14-1) related to accounting for
convertible debt that may be settled in cash upon conversion, now referred to as FASB ASC Topic
470. The new guidance requires the issuer of certain convertible debt instruments that may be
settled in cash on conversion to separately account for the liability and equity components in a
manner that reflects the issuers nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. We have no current
convertible debt instruments, and concluded that all of our prior instruments were not within the
scope of the new guidance; therefore, there was no retrospective effect from the adoption of the
new guidance on our financial statements.
In June 2008, the FASB issued clarifying guidance (issued as EITF Issue No. 07-5) related to
determining whether an instrument is indexed to an entitys own stock, now referred to as ASC Topic
815. The new guidance was effective for us on January 1, 2009. The adoption of the new guidance
had no impact on our financial statements.
6
In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance (issued as Staff Position FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2) related
to the recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairments, now referred to as ASC
Topic 320. The guidance requires, among other things, that other-than-temporary impairments be
separated into the amount recognized in earnings and the amount recognized in other comprehensive
income. The guidance was effective for us on June 30, 2009. The adoption of the new guidance had
no impact on our financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued additional guidance (issued as FSP 157-4) related to determining
fair value when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability has significantly
decreased and required additional disclosures about fair value measurements in annual and interim
reporting periods. FASB ASC Topic 820 provides guidance on estimating fair value when the volume
and level of transaction activity for an asset or liability have significantly decreased in
relation to normal market activity for the asset or liability. The standard also provides guidance
on circumstances that may indicate that a transaction is not orderly. The additional guidance
within FASB ASC Topic 820 was effective for us on June 30, 2009. The adoption of the additional
guidance had no impact on our financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued additional guidance (issued as Staff Position FAS 107-1 and APB
28-1) related to interim disclosures about fair value of financial instruments, now referred to as
FASB ASC Topic 825. The additional guidance extends the disclosure requirements of prior guidance
to interim financial statements of publicly traded companies. The additional guidance was
effective for us on June 30, 2009. The adoption of the additional guidance had no impact on our
financial statements, since we have been making the required disclosures in our interim financial
statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued additional guidance (issued as SFAS No. 165) , now referred to as ASC
Topic 855, related to subsequent events and provides authoritative guidance regarding subsequent
events as this guidance was previously only addressed in auditing literature. The additional
guidance was effective for us on June 30, 2009 and its adoption had no impact on our financial
statements. We have evaluated subsequent events through November 5, 2009, the date of filing of
this report with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
In September 2009, FASB ASC 605-25 was updated (ASU No. 2009-07) related to revenue recognition for
arrangements with multiple elements. The new guidance will be effective for us for our annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Early adoption is permitted provided
that the new guidance is retroactively applied to the beginning of the year of adoption. We have
not yet evaluated the potential effect of the future adoption of this new guidance.
3. Net Loss per Share
Basic and diluted net loss per share has been computed using the weighted-average number of shares
of common stock outstanding during the period.
We have outstanding options and warrants that are not used in the calculation of diluted net loss
per share because to do so would be anti-dilutive. The following instruments were excluded from
the calculation of diluted net loss per share because their effects would be antidilutive:
1) |
|
Outstanding stock options to purchase 3,881,149 shares of common stock for both the three-
and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009, and 3,733,240 shares of common stock for both
the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008; and |
2) |
|
Warrants to purchase 5,125,496 shares of common stock for each of the three- and nine-month
periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. |
7
4. Comprehensive Loss
All components of comprehensive loss, including net loss, are reported in the financial statements
in the period in which they are recognized. Comprehensive loss is defined as the change in equity
during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources.
Below is a reconciliation, in thousands, of net loss to comprehensive loss for all periods
presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(3,380 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,493 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,352 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,279 |
) |
Unrealized loss on
available-for-sale
securities |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(3,405 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,538 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,369 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,384 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Our available-for-sale securities include U.S. government obligations and corporate debt
securities. As of September 30, 2009, approximately 69% of our investments were in U.S. government
obligations, which included government-backed agencies.
The inputs used to measure fair value are classified into the following hierarchy:
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities,
or unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in
markets that are not active, or inputs other than quoted prices that are
observable for the asset or liability. |
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. |
The following table provides a summary of the fair values of our assets and liabilities measured at
fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2009 Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in Active |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
|
|
Markets for Identical |
|
|
Observable Inputs |
|
|
Significant Unobservable |
|
Description |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
Assets (Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
Inputs (Level 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
securities |
|
$ |
13,225 |
|
|
$ |
13,225 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Fair value is based upon quoted market prices in active markets. We had no level 2 or level 3
assets at September 30, 2009. We review and reassess the fair value hierarchy classifications on a
quarterly basis. Changes from one quarter to the next related to the observability of inputs to a
fair value measurement may result in a reclassification between hierarchy levels.
8
The following is a summary of available-for-sale securities (in thousands) at September 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Value |
|
September 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government
obligations, which
included
government-backed
agencies |
|
$ |
9,080 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
$ |
9,153 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
4,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
4,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,122 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
$ |
13,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government
obligations, which
included
government-backed
agencies |
|
$ |
13,603 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
125 |
|
|
$ |
13,728 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
5,338 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
5,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18,941 |
|
|
$ |
(24 |
) |
|
$ |
144 |
|
|
$ |
19,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We had no realized gains or losses on the sale of available-for-sale securities for any of the
periods presented. Unrealized gains and losses on our available-for-sale securities are excluded
from earnings and are reported as a separate component of stockholders equity within accumulated
other comprehensive income until realized. We have no other-than-temporary impairments recognized
in accumulated other comprehensive income. When available-for-sale securities are sold in the
future, the cost of the securities will be specifically identified and used to determine any
realized gain or loss. The net unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities was $103,000 and
$120,000 as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
The amortized cost of and estimated fair value of available-for-sale securities at September 30,
2009, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual
maturities because the issuers of the securities may have the right to repay the obligations
without prepayment penalties. Although the investments are available-for-sale, it is our intention
to hold the investments classified as long-term for more than a year from September 30, 2009 (in
thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
9,552 |
|
|
$ |
9,621 |
|
Due after one year through two years |
|
|
3,571 |
|
|
|
3,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,123 |
|
|
$ |
13,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also, in connection with a dormant joint venture accounted for under the equity method, we received
in 2003 and 2006 stock in another privately-held company with an aggregate value of $200,000 based
on the value at the time of issuance. In the third quarter of 2009, we invested an additional
$14,000 in the privately-held company. We have evaluated our investment in the privately-held
company, which is a cost-method investment, noting no impairment.
6. Collaboration
Collaborative arrangements that involve cost or revenue sharing are reviewed to determine the
nature of the arrangement and the nature of the collaborative parties businesses. The
arrangements are also reviewed to determine if one party has sole or primary responsibility for an
activity, or whether the parties have shared responsibility for the activity. If responsibility
for an activity is shared and there is
no principal party, then the related costs of that activity are recognized by us on a net basis in
the statement of operations (e.g., total cost, less reimbursement from collaborator). If we are
deemed to be the principal party for an activity, then the costs and revenues associated with that
activity are recognized on a gross basis in the statement of operations.
9
In 2006, we entered into a co-development collaboration with Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and
received $10 million in initial funding. We may receive up to $3.75 million of equity investments
and $63.75 million of aggregate cash payments upon the successful achievement of specified clinical
development and commercialization milestones, though there can be no assurance that we will achieve
any such milestones. We continue to jointly fund clinical development activities with Angiotech in
accordance with our collaboration, and, as of September 30, 2009, $183,000 was due from Angiotech.
Our clinical costs for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are reflected net
of Angiotechs cost-sharing amount in the amounts of $183,000 and $243,000, respectively, since the
responsibilities under this collaboration are shared with no principal party. The parties will
share net profits from the future sale of approved products, if any.
7. Stock-Based Compensation
We have two incentive plans that authorize an aggregate of 4,500,000 shares of common stock for
awards to employees, directors and consultants. These equity incentive plans authorize the
issuance of equity-based compensation in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights,
restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares and units, and other stock-based
awards to qualified employees, directors and consultants.
As of September 30, 2009, a total of 621,000 shares were available for issuance under our equity
compensation plans and options to purchase 3,881,149 shares of common stock were outstanding (which
includes options to purchase 2,149 shares of common stock related to our old option plans prior to
our merger in June 2007). For the three-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, stock
compensation expense was approximately $515,000 and $501,000, respectively. At September 30, 2009,
total unrecognized estimated compensation cost related to unvested stock options was approximately
$1.6 million, which is expected to be recognized by the end of 2012 using the straight-line method.
8. Warrants
As of September 30, 2009, we had the following outstanding warrants to purchase shares of common
stock that were issued upon the closing of our equity offering in June 2007 to investors and
lenders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of underlying shares |
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Expiration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,976,470 |
|
|
$ |
6.00 |
|
|
June 8, 2012 |
|
149,026 |
|
|
$ |
5.00 |
|
|
June 8, 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,125,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Income Taxes
We have net operating loss and research and development tax credit carryforwards that may be used
to reduce future taxable income and tax liabilities. However, as a result of the change in
ownership related to our capital restructuring and equity offering in June 2007, we lost the use of
a significant portion of our pre-merger net operating loss carryforwards under Section 382 of the
Internal Revenue Code. Our deferred tax assets have been fully offset by a valuation allowance due
to our cumulative losses.
10
10. Contingencies
In 2004, we issued $7.5 million of notes payable to lenders, which were repaid in June 2008. The
lenders retain a right to receive a milestone payment of $2.25 million upon the occurrence of
certain events as follows: (1) the entire amount upon (a) our merger with or into another entity
where our stockholders do not hold at least a majority of the voting power of the surviving entity;
(b) the sale of all or substantially all of our assets; or (c) our liquidation or dissolution; or
(2) a portion of the amount from proceeds of equity financings not tied to research and development
activities that are part of a research or development collaboration, in which case, the lenders
will receive an amount equal to 10% of proceeds above $5 million in cumulative gross proceeds until
the milestone amount is paid in full. The milestone amount is payable in cash, except that if the
milestone event is (2) above, we may elect to pay 75% in shares of common stock at the per-share
offering price. No amounts have been recorded in relation to the milestone as of September 30,
2009.
We filed a resale registration statement with the SEC in July 2007 covering the resale of
18,508,251 shares of common stock, which was declared effective by the SEC in 2007. Subject to
certain exceptions, if the registration statement ceases to remain effective, a 1% cash penalty
will be assessed for each 30-day period until the registration statement becomes effective again,
capped at 10% of the aggregate gross proceeds in the June 2007 offering. Because this potential
penalty is based on the number of unregistered shares of common stock held by investors that
purchased those shares in the June 2007 offering, our maximum penalty exposure will decline over
time as those investors sell their shares of common stock that were included in the registration
statement.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and notes
thereto included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the audited financial statement and
notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Operating results are not necessarily indicative of results that may occur in future periods.
Overview and Recent Developments
We are a biopharmaceutical company engaged in the discovery and development of therapeutic product
candidates designed to extend and enhance the quality of human life. Through the application of our
proprietary technologies, we have established a pipeline of therapeutic product development
programs in multiple disease areas. Our current product development portfolio includes
MultiStem®, a patented and proprietary stem cell product that we are developing as a
treatment for multiple disease indications, which is currently being evaluated in two ongoing
clinical trials. In addition, we are developing novel pharmaceuticals to treat indications such as
obesity and certain neurological conditions that affect attention, cognition or wakefulness, such
as narcolepsy, excessive daytime sleepiness, and chronic fatigue associated with Parkinsons
disease and other conditions.
Current Programs
In 2008, we advanced two MultiStem programs into clinical development, initiating phase I studies
in cardiovascular disease (treating patients that have suffered an acute myocardial infarction) and
in oncology treatment support (administering MultiStem to leukemia or lymphoma patients who are
receiving a traditional bone marrow or hematopoietic stem cell transplant to reduce the risk or
severity of graft-versus-host disease, (GVHD)). We are conducting the acute myocardial
infarction clinical trial with our partner, Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Angiotech). In
2006, we entered into a product co-development collaboration with Angiotech to jointly develop and
ultimately market MultiStem for the treatment of certain cardiovascular indications, including
myocardial infarction and peripheral vascular disease. We retain the exclusive commercial rights
to the development of MultiStem for other indication areas, including oncology treatment support,
neurological indications, autoimmune disease, and other areas.
11
Although early in 2009 we suspended the further development of our ATHX-105 obesity product
candidate, we are continuing to develop next generation 5HT2c agonist compounds while we explore
potential partnerships for the program. We are also developing a different class of novel, orally
active pharmaceutical compounds for the treatment of certain central nervous system disorders,
including disorders affecting attention, cognition or wakefulness.
Our collaboration agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb, which was initially established in 2001 to
provide cell lines expressing well validated drug targets produced using our RAGE technology, is
now in its final phase. In April 2009, we executed an agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb
extending our collaboration to prepare and deliver validated drug targets through 2009 for use by
Bristol-Myers Squibb in its drug discovery efforts and to provide for the possibility of delivering
additional validated drug targets in the future. We remain entitled to receive license fees for
targets delivered to Bristol-Myers Squibb, as well as milestone payments and royalties on compounds
developed by Bristol-Myers Squibb using our technology.
Financial
We have incurred losses since inception of operations in 1995 and had an accumulated deficit of
$189 million at September 30, 2009. Our losses have resulted principally from costs incurred in
research and development, clinical and preclinical product development, acquisition and licensing
costs, and general and administrative costs associated with our operations. We have used the
financing proceeds from private equity and debt offerings and other sources of capital to develop
our technologies, to discover and develop therapeutic product candidates and to acquire certain
technologies and assets. We have also built drug development capabilities that have enabled us to
advance product candidates into clinical trials. We have established strategic collaborations that
have provided revenues and capabilities to help further advance our product candidates, and we have
also built a substantial portfolio of intellectual property.
Results of Operations
Since our inception, our revenues have consisted of license fees and milestone payments from our
collaborators, and grant proceeds primarily from federal and state grants. We have derived no
revenue on the sale of FDA-approved products to date. Research and development expenses consist
primarily of external clinical and preclinical study fees, manufacturing costs for clinical and
preclinical product, salaries and related personnel costs, legal expenses resulting from
intellectual property prosecution processes, facility costs and laboratory supply and reagent
costs. We expense research and development costs as they are incurred. We expect to continue to
make significant investments in research and development to enhance our technologies, conduct
clinical trials of our product candidates, advance our regulatory affairs and product development
capabilities, undertake preclinical studies of our product and manufacture our product candidates.
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and related personnel costs,
professional fees and other corporate expenses. To date, we have financed our operations through
private equity and debt financing and investments by strategic collaborators. We expect to continue
to incur substantial losses through at least the next several years.
The following tables set forth our revenues and expenses for the periods indicated. The
following tables are stated in thousands.
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
License fees |
|
$ |
167 |
|
|
$ |
885 |
|
|
$ |
636 |
|
|
$ |
1,728 |
|
Grant revenue |
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
1,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
484 |
|
|
$ |
1,278 |
|
|
$ |
1,290 |
|
|
$ |
2,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
Research and development expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
Type of expense |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Personnel costs |
|
$ |
844 |
|
|
$ |
675 |
|
|
$ |
2,509 |
|
|
$ |
2,241 |
|
Research supplies |
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
649 |
|
Facilities |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
Clinical and preclinical
development costs |
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
2,639 |
|
|
|
988 |
|
|
|
6,471 |
|
Sponsored research |
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
668 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
Patent legal fees |
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
1,055 |
|
|
|
1,077 |
|
Other |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,704 |
|
|
$ |
4,730 |
|
|
$ |
7,868 |
|
|
$ |
12,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
Type of expense |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Personnel costs |
|
$ |
468 |
|
|
$ |
370 |
|
|
$ |
1,453 |
|
|
$ |
1,335 |
|
Facilities |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
Legal and professional
fees |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
733 |
|
Other |
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
933 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,189 |
|
|
$ |
1,246 |
|
|
$ |
3,928 |
|
|
$ |
4,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
Revenues. Revenues decreased to $484,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from $1.3
million in the comparable period in 2008. Grant revenue decreased $76,000 for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2008 primarily due to the
completion late in 2008 of a three-year state grant and to the timing of expenditures that are
reimbursed with grant proceeds. License fee revenue decreased $718,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2008 as a result of the nature
and timing of target acceptances and fees under our collaboration agreement with Bristol-Myers
Squibb, including a clinical development milestone in the third quarter of 2008. During the
remainder of 2009, our revenues may continue to fluctuate compared to 2008 as a result of
differences in demand for targets and the achievement and timing of Bristol-Myers Squibb
milestones, if any. Beyond 2009, we anticipate that Bristol-Myers Squibbs demand for new targets
will be reduced, or cease altogether. Additionally, our grant revenues could fluctuate based on
the timing of grant-related activities and the award of new grants for which we continue to apply.
13
Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses decreased to $2.7 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2009 from $4.7 million in the comparable period in 2008. The
decrease of approximately $2.0 million related primarily to a decrease in clinical and preclinical
development costs of $2.3 million, a decrease in research supplies of $69,000, and a decrease in
patent legal fees and other of $84,000, partially offset by an increase in other research and
development expenses of approximately $437,000. Of the decrease in clinical and preclinical
development costs of $2.3 million, $2.1 million related to preparations for a phase II clinical
trial of ATHX-105 in 2008, which included several preclinical studies and manufacturing costs. The
ATHX-105 program was suspended early in 2009 and there will be no future costs incurred for the
program. The remaining $200,000 decrease in clinical and preclinical development costs related
primarily to less external costs for regulatory consulting and other preclinical studies. Our
clinical costs for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are reflected net of
Angiotechs cost-sharing amount related to our MultiStem acute myocardial infarction collaboration
in the amount of $183,000 and $243,000, respectively. The increase in other research and
development expenses of approximately $437,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from
the comparable period in 2008 was primarily a result of increased sponsored research costs
associated with a grant and increased personnel and stock-based compensation costs in the third
quarter of 2009. Our research and development costs may fluctuate as we advance the clinical
development of our product candidates and enroll subjects in clinical trials. Other than external
expenses for our clinical and preclinical programs, we do not track our research expenses by
project, rather, we track such expenses by the type of cost incurred.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses remained consistent at
approximately $1.2 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
Depreciation. Depreciation expense remained relatively consistent at $58,000 for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 and $49,000 for the comparable period in 2008.
Interest Income and Other. Interest income represents interest income earned on our cash and
available-for-sale securities and other income includes foreign currency gains and losses, if any,
related to our activities in Europe and certain contracts denominated in foreign currencies.
Interest income and other decreased to $89,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from
$254,000 for the comparable period in 2008 due to the decline in our investment balances as they
are used to fund our operations. We expect our 2009 interest income to continue to decline through
the remainder of 2009.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
Revenues. Revenues decreased to $1.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
from $2.8 million in the comparable period in 2008. Grant revenue decreased $464,000 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008 primarily due
to the completion late in 2008 of a three-year state grant and to the timing of expenditures that
are reimbursed with grant proceeds. License fee revenue decreased $1.1 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008 as a result of
the nature and timing of target acceptances and fees under our collaboration agreement with
Bristol-Myers Squibb, including a clinical development milestone in the third quarter of 2008.
During 2009, our revenues may fluctuate compared to 2008 as a result of differences in demand for
targets and the achievement and timing of Bristol-Myers Squibb milestones, if any. Beyond 2009, we
anticipate that Bristol-Myers Squibbs demand for new targets will be reduced, or cease altogether.
Additionally, our grant revenues could fluctuate based on the timing of grant-related activities
and the award of new grants for which we continue to apply.
14
Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses decreased to $7.9 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $12.8 million in the comparable period in 2008. The
decrease of approximately $4.9 million related primarily to a decrease in clinical and preclinical
development costs of $5.5 million and a decrease in patent legal fees and other of $173,000,
partially
offset by an increase in other research and development expenses of approximately $742,000. Of the
decrease in clinical and preclinical development costs of $5.5 million, $4.5 million related to
costs associated with the completion of an ATHX-105 phase I clinical trial in the first half of
2008 and preparations for a phase II clinical trial of ATHX-105 in 2008, which included several
preclinical studies and manufacturing costs. The ATHX-105 program was suspended early in 2009 and
there will be no future costs incurred for the program. The remaining $1.0 million decrease in
clinical and preclinical development costs related primarily to a $235,000 credit from a
renegotiated contract with a contract research organization in June 2009, $322,000 of manufacturing
costs in the first nine months of 2008 associated with our MultiStem clinical trials, and reduced
external costs for regulatory consulting and preclinical studies in the first nine months of 2009
compared to 2008. Our clinical costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are
reflected net of Angiotechs cost-sharing amount related to our MultiStem acute myocardial
infarction collaboration in the amount of $621,000 and $709,000, respectively. The increase in
other expenses of approximately $742,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from the
comparable period in 2008 was primarily a result of increased sponsored research costs associated
with a grant, and increased personnel, stock-based compensation and research supply costs in the
first nine months of 2009. Our research and development costs may fluctuate as we advance the
clinical development of our product candidates and enroll subjects in clinical trials. Other than
external expenses for our clinical and preclinical programs, we do not track our research expenses
by project, rather, we track such expenses by the type of cost incurred.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses remained relatively
consistent at approximately $3.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and $4.1
million in the comparable period in 2008.
Depreciation. Depreciation expense remained relatively consistent at $175,000 for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and $158,000 for the comparable period in 2008.
Interest Income and Other. Interest income represents interest income earned on our cash and
available-for-sale securities and other income includes foreign currency gains and losses, if any,
related to our activities in Europe and certain contracts denominated in foreign currencies.
Interest income and other decreased to $331,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from
$1.0 million for the comparable period in 2008 due to the decline in our investment balances as
they are used to fund our operations. We expect our 2009 interest income to continue to decline
through the remainder of 2009.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our sources of liquidity include our cash balances and available-for-sale securities. At September
30, 2009, we had $9.2 million in cash and cash equivalents and $13.2 million in available-for-sale
securities. We have primarily financed our operations through private equity and debt financings
that have resulted in aggregate cumulative proceeds of approximately $200 million.
Our available-for-sale securities typically include United States government obligations and
corporate debt securities. As of September 30, 2009, approximately 69% of our investments were in
United States government obligations, which included government-backed agencies. We have been
investing conservatively due to the current economic conditions, including the current credit
crisis, and have prioritized liquidity and the preservation of principal in lieu of potentially
higher returns. As a result, we have experienced no losses on the principal of our investments and
have held our investments until maturity. Also, although these unfavorable market and economic
conditions have resulted in a decrease to our market capitalization, there has been no impairment
to the value of our assets. Our fixed assets are used for internal research and development and,
therefore, are not impacted by these external factors.
15
We will require substantial additional funding in order to continue our research and product
development programs, including preclinical testing and clinical trials of our product candidates.
We expect to have available cash to fund our operations approximately through 2011 based on our
current
business and operational plans and assuming no new financings. Our funding requirements may change
at any time due to technological advances or competition from other companies. Our future capital
requirements will also depend on numerous other factors, including scientific progress in our
research and development programs, additional personnel costs, progress in preclinical testing and
clinical trials, the time and cost related to proposed regulatory approvals, if any, and the costs
in filing and prosecuting patent applications and enforcing patent claims. We cannot assure you
that adequate funding will be available to us or, if available, that it will be available on
acceptable terms, particularly in light of the current credit crisis. Any shortfall in funding
could result in, among other things, our having to curtail our research and development efforts.
We expect to continue to incur substantial losses through at least the next several years and may
incur losses in subsequent periods. The amount and timing of our future losses are highly
uncertain. Our ability to achieve and thereafter sustain profitability will be dependent upon,
among other things, successfully developing, commercializing and obtaining regulatory approval or
clearances for our technologies and products resulting from these technologies.
Net cash used in operating activities was $9.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
and $12.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 representing the use of cash in
funding research, preclinical and clinical development initiatives and administrative costs, and
may fluctuate as we advance the clinical development of our product candidates and enroll subjects
in clinical trials.
Net cash provided by investing activities was $5.6 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and $15.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The fluctuations from period
to period are due to the timing of purchases and maturity dates of investments and the purchase of
equipment. Purchases of equipment were $54,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
$486,000 in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008.
Financing activities provided no cash for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and used cash of
$1.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 related to the repayment of our senior
loan in June 2008.
Bridge noteholders and investors in the equity offering in June 2007 received five-year warrants to
purchase an aggregate of 132,945 and 3,250,000 shares of common stock, respectively, with an
exercise price of $6.00 per share. The lead investor received additional five-year warrants to
purchase an aggregate of 500,000 shares of common stock with a cash or cashless exercise price of
$6.00 per share. The placement agents received five-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of
1,093,525 shares of common stock with a cash or cashless exercise price of $6.00 per share. The
exercise of such warrants could provide us with cash proceeds. No warrants were exercised at
September 30, 2009.
Our senior loan was repaid in full in June 2008. The senior lenders retain a right to receive a
milestone payment of $2.25 million upon the occurrence of certain events as follows: (1) the entire
amount upon (a) the merger with or into another entity where our stockholders do not hold at least
a majority of the voting power of the surviving entity, (b) the sale of all or substantially all
of our assets, or (c) our liquidation or dissolution; or (2) a portion of the amount from proceeds
of equity financings not tied to specific research and development activities that are part of a
research or development collaboration, in which case, the senior lenders will receive an amount
equal to 10% of proceeds above $5.0 million in cumulative gross proceeds until the milestone amount
is paid in full. The milestone payment is payable in cash, except that if the milestone event is
(2) above, we may elect to pay 75% of the milestone in shares of common stock at the per-share
offering price. No milestone events have occurred as of September 30, 2009. The senior lenders
also received warrants to purchase 149,026 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $5.00
upon the closing of our equity offering in June 2007. The exercise of such warrants could provide
us with cash proceeds. No warrants were exercised at September 30, 2009.
16
Our collaboration agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb, which was initially established in 2001 to
provide cell lines expressing well validated drug targets produced using our RAGE technology, is
now in its final phase. In April 2009, we executed an agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb
extending our collaboration to prepare and deliver validated drug targets through 2009 for use by
Bristol-Myers Squibb in its drug discovery efforts and to provide for the possibility of delivering
additional validated drug targets in the future. We remain entitled to receive license fees for
targets delivered to Bristol-Myers Squibb, as well as milestone payments and royalties on compounds
developed by Bristol-Myers Squibb using our technology.
In connection with our MultiStem collaboration with Angiotech, upon the successful achievement of
specified clinical development and commercialization milestones, we may receive up to $3.75 million
of additional equity investments and $63.75 million of aggregate cash payments, though there can be
no assurance that we will achieve any milestones. We continue to jointly fund clinical development
activities with Angiotech in accordance with our collaboration, and, as of September 30, 2009,
$183,000 was due from Angiotech.
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND MANAGEMENT ESTIMATES
The SEC defines critical accounting policies as those that are, in managements view, important to
the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and demanding of managements
judgment. Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based on
our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The preparation of these financial statements requires us
to make estimates on experience and on various assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values
of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may
differ from those estimates. A description of these accounting policies and estimates is included
in Item 7 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. There have been no material
changes in our accounting policies and estimates as described in our Annual Report. For additional
information regarding our accounting policies, see Note B to the Consolidated Financial Statements
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
New Accounting Standards
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued guidance (issued as EITF
Issue No. 07-1) related to accounting for collaborative arrangements, now referred to as Accounting
Standards Codification (ASC) FASB ASC Topic 808. The effective date of the guidance was January
1, 2009 for calendar year companies with retrospective application required for all periods
presented for collaborative arrangements existing as of the effective date. FASB ASC Topic 808
requires certain disclosures related to collaborative arrangements where parties are active
participants and exposed to significant risks and rewards dependent on the commercial success of
the activity. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on our financial
statements because our accounting for our collaborative agreement was consistent with the
standards provisions.
In May 2008, the FASB issued guidance (issued as Staff Position APB 14-1) related to accounting for
convertible debt that may be settled in cash upon conversion, now referred to as FASB ASC Topic
470. The new guidance requires the issuer of certain convertible debt instruments that may be
settled in cash on conversion to separately account for the liability and equity components in a
manner that reflects the issuers nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. We have no current
convertible debt instruments, and concluded that all of our prior instruments were not within the
scope of the new guidance; therefore, there was no retrospective effect from the adoption of the
new guidance on our financial statements.
17
In June 2008, the FASB issued clarifying guidance (issued as EITF Issue No. 07-5) related to
determining whether an instrument is indexed to an entitys own stock, now referred to as ASC Topic
815. The new guidance was effective for us on January 1, 2009. The adoption of the new guidance
had no impact on our financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued guidance (issued as Staff Position FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2) related
to the recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairments, now referred to as ASC
Topic 320. The guidance requires, among other things, that other-than-temporary impairments be
separated into the amount recognized in earnings and the amount recognized in other comprehensive
income. The guidance was effective for us on June 30, 2009. The adoption of the new guidance had
no impact on our financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued additional guidance (issued as FSP 157-4) related to determining
fair value when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability has significantly
decreased and required additional disclosures about fair value measurements in annual and interim
reporting periods. FASB ASC Topic 820 provides guidance on estimating fair value when the volume
and level of transaction activity for an asset or liability have significantly decreased in
relation to normal market activity for the asset or liability. The standard also provides guidance
on circumstances that may indicate that a transaction is not orderly. The additional guidance
within FASB ASC Topic 820 was effective for us on June 30, 2009. The adoption of the additional
guidance had no impact on our financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued additional guidance (issued as Staff Position FAS 107-1 and APB
28-1) related to interim disclosures about fair value of financial instruments, now referred to as
FASB ASC Topic 825. The additional guidance extends the disclosure requirements of prior guidance
to interim financial statements of publicly traded companies. The additional guidance was
effective for us on June 30, 2009. The adoption of the additional guidance had no impact on our
financial statements, since we have been making the required disclosures in our interim financial
statements.
In May 2009, the FASB issued additional guidance (issued as SFAS No. 165) , now referred to as ASC
Topic 855, related to subsequent events and provides authoritative guidance regarding subsequent
events as this guidance was previously only addressed in auditing literature. The additional
guidance was effective for us on June 30, 2009 and its adoption had no impact on our financial
statements. We have evaluated subsequent events through November 5, 2009, the date of filing of
this report with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
In September 2009, FASB ASC 605-25 was updated (ASU No. 2009-07) related to revenue recognition for
arrangements with multiple elements. The new guidance will be effective for us for our annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Early adoption is permitted provided
that the new guidance is retroactively applied to the beginning of the year of adoption. We have
not yet evaluated the potential effect of the future adoption of this new guidance.
CAUTIONARY NOTE ON FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve risks and uncertainties. These
forward-looking statements relate to, among other things, the expected timetable for development of
our product candidates, our growth strategy, and our future financial performance, including our
operations, economic performance, financial condition, prospects, and other future events. We have
attempted to identify forward-looking statements by using such words as anticipates, believes,
can, continue, could, estimates, expects, intends, may, plans, potential,
should, will, or other similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are only
predictions and are largely based on our current expectations. These forward-looking statements
appear in a number of places in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
18
In addition, a number of known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors could affect the
accuracy of these statements. Some of the more significant known risks that we face are the risks
and uncertainties inherent in the process of discovering, developing, and commercializing products
that are safe and effective for use as human therapeutics, including the uncertainty regarding
market acceptance of our product candidates and our ability to generate revenues. These risks may
cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements to differ materially
from any future results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by
these forward-looking statements.
Other important factors to consider in evaluating our forward-looking statements include:
|
|
|
our ability to successfully initiate or complete clinical trials for our product
candidates; |
|
|
|
the possibility of delays in, adverse results of and excessive costs of the development
process; |
|
|
|
changes in external market factors; |
|
|
|
changes in our industrys overall performance; |
|
|
|
changes in our business strategy; |
|
|
|
our ability to protect our intellectual property portfolio; |
|
|
|
our possible inability to enter into licensing or co-development arrangements for
certain product candidates; |
|
|
|
our possible inability to execute our strategy due to changes in our industry or the
economy generally, including the current economic crisis; |
|
|
|
our ability to obtain capital in difficult market conditions; |
|
|
|
changes in financial stability of collaborators; |
|
|
|
changes in productivity and reliability of suppliers; and |
|
|
|
the success of our competitors and the emergence of new competitors. |
Although we currently believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking
statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee our future results, levels of activity or
performance. We undertake no obligation to publicly update forward-looking statements, whether as
a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. You are
advised, however, to consult any further disclosures we make on related subjects in our reports on
Forms 10-Q, 8-K and 10-K furnished to the SEC. You should understand that it is not possible to
predict or identify all risk factors. Consequently, you should not consider any such list to be a
complete set of all potential risks or uncertainties.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. |
Interest Rate Risk
Our exposure to interest rate risk is related to our investment portfolio and our borrowings. Fixed
rate investments and borrowings may have their fair market value adversely impacted from changes in
interest rates. Due in part to these factors, our future investment income may fall short of
expectations. Further, we may suffer losses in investment principal if we are forced to sell
securities that have declined in market value due to changes in interest rates. We invest our
excess cash primarily in debt instruments of the United States government and its agencies,
corporate debt securities and A1+/P1 commercial paper. As of September 30, 2009, approximately 69%
of our investments were in United States government obligations, which included government-backed
agencies. We have been investing conservatively due to the current economic conditions, including
the current credit crisis, and have
prioritized liquidity and the preservation of principal in lieu of potentially higher returns. As
a result, we have experienced no losses on the principal of our investments.
19
We enter into loan arrangements with financial institutions when needed and when available to us.
At September 30, 2009, we had no borrowings outstanding.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures. |
Disclosure controls and procedures
Our management, under the supervision of and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer
and our Vice President of Finance, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Based upon this
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Vice President of Finance have concluded that, as of
the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting
During the third quarter of 2009, there has been no change in our internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Gil Van Bokkelen, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
pursuant to SEC Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Laura K. Campbell, Vice President of Finance, pursuant to
SEC Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Gil Van Bokkelen, Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer, and Laura Campbell, Vice President of Finance, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
20
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ATHERSYS, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 5, 2009
|
|
/s/ Gil Van Bokkelen
Gil Van Bokkelen
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
(principal executive officer authorized to sign on |
|
|
|
|
behalf of the registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Laura K. Campbell
Laura K. Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President, Finance |
|
|
|
|
(principal financial and accounting officer |
|
|
|
|
authorized to sign on behalf of the registrant) |
|
|
21
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Gil Van Bokkelen, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
pursuant to SEC Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Laura K. Campbell, Vice President of Finance, pursuant to
SEC Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Gil Van Bokkelen, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and
Laura Campbell, Vice President of Finance, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
22