e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 1-33615
Concho Resources Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
76-0818600 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
550 West Texas Avenue, Suite 100 |
|
|
Midland, Texas
|
|
79701 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
(432) 683-7443
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Number of shares of the registrants common stock outstanding at November 2, 2009: 85,784,691 shares.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of
the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the Exchange Act) that are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which
are beyond our control. All statements, other than statements of historical fact included in this
report, regarding our strategy, future operations, financial position, estimated revenues and
losses, projected costs, prospects, plans and objectives of management are forward-looking
statements. When used in this report, the words could, believe, anticipate, intend,
estimate, expect, may, continue, predict, potential, project and similar expressions
are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements
contain such identifying words. In particular, the factors discussed below and in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the
quarters ended March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009, could affect our actual results and cause our
actual results to differ materially from expectations, estimates, or assumptions expressed in,
forecasted in, or implied in such forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements may include statements about:
|
|
|
our business and financial strategy; |
|
|
|
the estimated quantities of oil and natural gas reserves; |
|
|
|
our use of industry technology; |
|
|
|
our realized oil and natural gas prices; |
|
|
|
the timing and amount of the future production of our oil and natural
gas; |
|
|
|
the amount, nature and timing of our capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
the drilling of our wells; |
|
|
|
our competition and government regulations; |
|
|
|
the marketing of our oil and natural gas; |
|
|
|
our exploitation activities or property acquisitions; |
|
|
|
the costs of exploiting and developing our properties and conducting
other operations; |
|
|
|
general economic and business conditions; |
|
|
|
our cash flow and anticipated liquidity; |
|
|
|
uncertainty regarding our future operating results; |
|
|
|
our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions contained in this
report that are not historical; and |
|
|
|
our ability to integrate acquisitions. |
You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. All forward-looking
statements speak only as of the date of this report. We do not undertake any obligation to release
publicly any revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after
the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by
law.
Although we believe that our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions reflected in or
suggested by the forward-looking statements we make in this report are reasonable, we can give no
assurance that they will be achieved. These cautionary statements qualify all forward-looking
statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf.
ii
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
iii
Concho Resources Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands, except share and per share data) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Assets
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
15,695 |
|
|
$ |
17,752 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and natural gas |
|
|
67,021 |
|
|
|
48,793 |
|
Joint operations and other |
|
|
72,402 |
|
|
|
92,833 |
|
Related parties |
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
9,405 |
|
|
|
113,149 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
5,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid costs and other |
|
|
8,462 |
|
|
|
5,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
178,923 |
|
|
|
278,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, at cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and natural gas properties, successful efforts method |
|
|
2,980,268 |
|
|
|
2,693,574 |
|
Accumulated depletion |
|
|
(468,247 |
) |
|
|
(306,990 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total oil and natural gas properties, net |
|
|
2,512,021 |
|
|
|
2,386,584 |
|
Other property and equipment, net |
|
|
16,151 |
|
|
|
14,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, net |
|
|
2,528,172 |
|
|
|
2,401,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred loan costs, net |
|
|
21,982 |
|
|
|
15,701 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
24,351 |
|
|
|
19,956 |
|
Intangible asset, net operating rights |
|
|
36,909 |
|
|
|
37,768 |
|
Noncurrent derivative instruments |
|
|
30,727 |
|
|
|
61,157 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,821,526 |
|
|
$ |
2,815,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade |
|
$ |
12,010 |
|
|
$ |
7,462 |
|
Related parties |
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
Other current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank overdrafts |
|
|
2,810 |
|
|
|
9,434 |
|
Revenue payable |
|
|
40,532 |
|
|
|
22,286 |
|
Accrued and prepaid drilling costs |
|
|
120,726 |
|
|
|
154,196 |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
23,158 |
|
|
|
1,866 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,205 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
42,204 |
|
|
|
38,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
242,233 |
|
|
|
270,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
645,747 |
|
|
|
630,000 |
|
Noncurrent derivative instruments |
|
|
16,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
591,029 |
|
|
|
573,763 |
|
Asset retirement obligations and other long-term liabilities |
|
|
13,258 |
|
|
|
15,468 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note K) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 300,000,000 authorized; 85,605,502 and 84,828,824 shares
issued at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,023,543 |
|
|
|
1,009,025 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
289,488 |
|
|
|
316,169 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost; 12,380 and 3,142 shares at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively |
|
|
(417 |
) |
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,312,700 |
|
|
|
1,325,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,821,526 |
|
|
$ |
2,815,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
1
Concho Resources Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Operating revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil sales |
|
$ |
121,301 |
|
|
$ |
130,600 |
|
|
$ |
287,786 |
|
|
$ |
301,826 |
|
Natural gas sales |
|
|
32,193 |
|
|
|
39,857 |
|
|
|
79,042 |
|
|
|
112,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
153,494 |
|
|
|
170,457 |
|
|
|
366,828 |
|
|
|
414,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and natural gas production |
|
|
25,439 |
|
|
|
27,041 |
|
|
|
76,022 |
|
|
|
65,915 |
|
Exploration and abandonments |
|
|
2,776 |
|
|
|
16,824 |
|
|
|
10,195 |
|
|
|
20,288 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
54,835 |
|
|
|
32,528 |
|
|
|
157,985 |
|
|
|
75,822 |
|
Accretion of discount on asset retirement obligations |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
799 |
|
|
|
571 |
|
Impairments of long-lived assets |
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
|
2,758 |
|
|
|
9,686 |
|
|
|
2,827 |
|
General and administrative (including non-cash stock-based
compensation of $2,548 and $1,925 for the three months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $6,661 and $4,954 for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively) |
|
|
12,715 |
|
|
|
10,778 |
|
|
|
38,633 |
|
|
|
27,044 |
|
Bad debt expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,905 |
|
Ineffective portion of cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(416 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,336 |
) |
(Gain) loss on derivatives not designated as hedges |
|
|
7,783 |
|
|
|
(163,312 |
) |
|
|
94,435 |
|
|
|
(43,678 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
104,899 |
|
|
|
(72,423 |
) |
|
|
387,755 |
|
|
|
150,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
48,595 |
|
|
|
242,880 |
|
|
|
(20,927 |
) |
|
|
264,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(6,809 |
) |
|
|
(10,255 |
) |
|
|
(17,379 |
) |
|
|
(19,755 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
(348 |
) |
|
|
1,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense |
|
|
(7,009 |
) |
|
|
(9,921 |
) |
|
|
(17,727 |
) |
|
|
(18,090 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
41,586 |
|
|
|
232,959 |
|
|
|
(38,654 |
) |
|
|
246,103 |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
(21,824 |
) |
|
|
(91,031 |
) |
|
|
11,973 |
|
|
|
(96,230 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
19,762 |
|
|
$ |
141,928 |
|
|
$ |
(26,681 |
) |
|
$ |
149,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
1.75 |
|
|
$ |
(0.31 |
) |
|
$ |
1.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in basic earnings per share |
|
|
85,061 |
|
|
|
81,288 |
|
|
|
84,798 |
|
|
|
77,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per share |
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
1.72 |
|
|
$ |
(0.31 |
) |
|
$ |
1.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in diluted earnings per share |
|
|
86,088 |
|
|
|
82,724 |
|
|
|
84,798 |
|
|
|
78,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
2
Concho Resources Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2008 |
|
|
84,829 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
1,009,025 |
|
|
$ |
316,169 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
$ |
(125 |
) |
|
$ |
1,325,154 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,681 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,681 |
) |
Stock options exercised |
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,501 |
|
Stock-based compensation for restricted stock |
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,433 |
|
Cancellation of restricted stock |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation for stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,228 |
|
Excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,357 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(292 |
) |
|
|
(292 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 |
|
|
85,606 |
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
$ |
1,023,543 |
|
|
$ |
289,488 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
$ |
(417 |
) |
|
$ |
1,312,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
Concho Resources Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(26,681 |
) |
|
$ |
149,873 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
157,985 |
|
|
|
75,822 |
|
Impairments of long-lived assets |
|
|
9,686 |
|
|
|
2,827 |
|
Accretion of discount on asset retirement obligations |
|
|
799 |
|
|
|
571 |
|
Exploration expense, including dry holes |
|
|
6,950 |
|
|
|
17,860 |
|
Non-cash compensation expense |
|
|
6,661 |
|
|
|
4,954 |
|
Bad debt expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,905 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(21,840 |
) |
|
|
86,908 |
|
(Gain) loss on sale of assets |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
(777 |
) |
Ineffective portion of cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,336 |
) |
(Gain) loss on derivatives not designated as hedges |
|
|
94,435 |
|
|
|
(43,678 |
) |
Dedesignated cash flow hedges reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
260 |
|
Other non-cash items |
|
|
2,656 |
|
|
|
2,749 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(10,367 |
) |
|
|
26,209 |
|
Prepaid costs and other |
|
|
(2,519 |
) |
|
|
(1,035 |
) |
Inventory |
|
|
(3,979 |
) |
|
|
(14,985 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
5,029 |
|
|
|
(12,472 |
) |
Revenue payable |
|
|
17,581 |
|
|
|
6,982 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
(4,465 |
) |
|
|
15,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
232,078 |
|
|
|
319,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures on oil and natural gas properties |
|
|
(316,756 |
) |
|
|
(213,666 |
) |
Acquisition of oil and gas properties, businesses and other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(586,925 |
) |
Additions to other property and equipment |
|
|
(3,716 |
) |
|
|
(6,711 |
) |
Proceeds from the sale of oil and natural gas properties and other assets |
|
|
1,004 |
|
|
|
1,034 |
|
Settlements received (paid) on derivatives not designated as hedges |
|
|
77,590 |
|
|
|
(29,170 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(241,878 |
) |
|
|
(835,438 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
672,650 |
|
|
|
767,800 |
|
Payments of long-term debt |
|
|
(656,916 |
) |
|
|
(460,700 |
) |
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
4,501 |
|
|
|
3,861 |
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation |
|
|
3,357 |
|
|
|
2,884 |
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
242,426 |
|
Proceeds from repayment of employee notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
333 |
|
Payments for loan costs |
|
|
(8,933 |
) |
|
|
(15,541 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(292 |
) |
|
|
(125 |
) |
Bank overdrafts |
|
|
(6,624 |
) |
|
|
(954 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
7,743 |
|
|
|
539,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(2,057 |
) |
|
|
23,946 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
17,752 |
|
|
|
30,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
15,695 |
|
|
$ |
54,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOWS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest and fees, net of $33 and $1,090 capitalized interest |
|
$ |
13,291 |
|
|
$ |
16,164 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
5,598 |
|
|
$ |
5,964 |
|
NON-CASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax effect of acquired oil and gas properties |
|
$ |
(835 |
) |
|
$ |
200,786 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
Note A. Organization and nature of operations
Concho Resources Inc. (the Company) is a Delaware corporation formed on February 22, 2006.
The Companys principal business is the acquisition, development, exploitation and exploration of
oil and natural gas properties in the Permian Basin region of Southeast New Mexico and West Texas.
Note B. Summary of significant accounting policies
Principles of consolidation. The consolidated financial statements of the Company include the
accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All material intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated.
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements. Preparation of financial
statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
periods. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Depletion of oil and natural gas
properties are determined using estimates of proved oil and natural gas reserves. There are
numerous uncertainties inherent in the estimation of quantities of proved reserves and in the
projection of future rates of production and the timing of development expenditures. Similarly,
evaluations for impairment of proved and unproved oil and natural gas properties are subject to
numerous uncertainties including, among others, estimates of future recoverable reserves and
commodity price outlooks. Other significant estimates include, but are not limited to, asset
retirement obligations, fair value of derivative financial instruments, purchase price allocations
for business and oil and natural gas property acquisitions and fair value of stock-based
compensation.
Interim financial statements. The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the
Company have not been audited by the Companys independent registered public accounting firm,
except that the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2008 is derived from audited
consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying consolidated
financial statements reflect all adjustments necessary to present fairly the Companys financial
position at September 30, 2009, its results of operations for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, and its cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. In preparing the accompanying
consolidated financial statements, management has made certain estimates and assumptions that
affect reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements and disclosures of contingencies.
Actual results may differ from those estimates. The results for interim periods are not necessarily
indicative of annual results.
Certain disclosures have been condensed or omitted from these consolidated financial
statements. Accordingly, these consolidated financial statements should be read with the audited
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Deferred loan costs. Deferred loan costs are stated at cost, net of amortization, which is
computed using the effective interest and straight-line methods. The Company had deferred loan
costs of $22.0 million and $15.7 million, net of accumulated amortization of $7.5 million and $4.9
million, at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
5
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
Future amortization expense of deferred loan costs at September 30, 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Credit |
|
|
8.625% |
|
|
Deferred |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Facility |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Loan Costs |
|
|
Remaining 2009 |
|
$ |
853 |
|
|
$ |
189 |
|
|
$ |
1,042 |
|
2010 |
|
|
3,411 |
|
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
4,213 |
|
2011 |
|
|
3,411 |
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
4,292 |
|
2012 |
|
|
3,411 |
|
|
|
968 |
|
|
|
4,379 |
|
2013 & thereafter |
|
|
1,990 |
|
|
|
6,066 |
|
|
|
8,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
13,076 |
|
|
$ |
8,906 |
|
|
$ |
21,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets. The Company has capitalized certain operating rights acquired in an
acquisition in 2008, see Note D. The gross operating rights of approximately $38.7 million, which
have no residual value, are amortized over the estimated economic life of approximately 25 years.
Impairment will be assessed if indicators of potential impairment exist or when there is a material
change in the remaining useful economic life. Amortization expense for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2009 was approximately $0.4 million and $1.2 million, respectively, and $0.3
million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008. The following table reflects the
estimated aggregate amortization expense at September 30, 2009 for each of the periods presented
below:
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining 2009 |
|
$ |
387 |
|
2010 |
|
|
1,549 |
|
2011 |
|
|
1,549 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1,549 |
|
2013 |
|
|
1,549 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
30,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
36,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and natural gas sales and imbalances. Oil and natural gas revenues are recorded at the
time of delivery of such products to pipelines for the account of the purchaser or at the time of
physical transfer of such products to the purchaser. The Company follows the sales method of
accounting for oil and natural gas sales, recognizing revenues based on the Companys share of
actual proceeds from the oil and natural gas sold to purchasers. Oil and natural gas imbalances are
generated on properties for which two or more owners have the right to take production in-kind
and, in doing so, take more or less than their respective entitled percentage. Imbalances are
tracked by well, but the Company does not record any receivable from or payable to the other owners
unless the imbalance has reached a level at which it exceeds the remaining reserves in the
respective well. If reserves are insufficient to offset the imbalance and the Company is in an
overtake position, a liability is recorded for the amount of shortfall in reserves valued at a
contract price or the market price in effect at the time the imbalance is generated. If the Company
is in an undertake position, a receivable is recorded for an amount that is reasonably expected to
be received, not to exceed the current market value of such imbalance.
6
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
The following table reflects the Companys natural gas imbalance positions at September 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008 as well as amounts reflected in oil and natural gas production expense
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overtake |
|
|
|
|
|
Overtake |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Undertake) |
|
|
|
|
|
(Undertake) |
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
Volume (Mcf) |
|
Amount |
|
Volume (Mcf) |
|
|
|
Natural gas imbalance receivable (included in other assets) |
|
$ |
434 |
|
|
|
(96,549 |
) |
|
$ |
406 |
|
|
|
(90,321 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas imbalance liability (included in asset retirement
obligations and other long-term liabilities) |
|
$ |
(451 |
) |
|
|
79,973 |
|
|
$ |
(472 |
) |
|
|
85,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Value of net overtake (undertake) arising during the period
(increasing (reducing) oil and natural gas production
expense) |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
(45 |
) |
|
$ |
(49 |
) |
|
$ |
(182 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net overtake (undertake) position arising during the
period (Mcf) |
|
|
(1,882 |
) |
|
|
(8,440 |
) |
|
|
(11,951 |
) |
|
|
(16,543 |
) |
Treasury stock. Treasury stock purchases are recorded at cost. Upon reissuance, the cost
of treasury shares held is reduced by the average purchase price per share of the aggregate
treasury shares held.
General and administrative expense. The Company receives fees for the operation of jointly
owned oil and natural gas properties and records such reimbursements as reductions of general and
administrative expense. Such fees totaled approximately $3.2 million and $2.1 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $8.6 million and $2.6 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Reclassifications. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2009
presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on net income (loss), total stockholders
equity or cash flows.
Recent accounting pronouncements:
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASC 105-10 (formerly
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 168), Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification
(the Codification) has become the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the
FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in
accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). All existing accounting standard
documents are superseded by the Codification and any accounting literature not included in the
Codification will not be authoritative. However, rules and interpretive releases of the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) issued under the authority of federal
securities laws will continue to be the source of authoritative generally accepted accounting
principles for SEC registrants. Effective September 30, 2009, there will be no more references made
to the superseded FASB standards in the Companys consolidated financial statements. The
Codification does not change or alter existing GAAP and, therefore, will not have an impact on the
Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
ASU 2009-05. In August 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2009-05, Fair
Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820)Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value (ASU 2009-05).
The FASB issued this update because some entities have expressed concern that there may be a lack
of observable market information to measure the fair value of a liability. ASU 2009-05 is effective
for the first reporting period beginning after August 28, 2009, with earlier application permitted.
The guidance provides clarification on measuring liabilities at fair value when a quoted price in
an active market is not available. In such circumstances, ASU 2009-05 specifies that a valuation
technique should be applied that uses either the quote of the liability when traded as an asset,
the quoted prices for similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets, or another
valuation technique consistent with existing fair value measurement guidance. Examples of the
alternative valuation methods include using a present value technique or a market
7
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
approach, which
is based on the amount at the measurement date that the reporting entity would pay to transfer the
identical liability or would receive to enter into the identical liability. The guidance also
states that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to
include a separate input or adjustments to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction
that prevents the transfer of the liability. The Company adopted ASU 2009-05 effective September
30, 2009, and the adoption did not have a significant impact on the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
ASU 2009-11. In September 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-11, Extractive Activities Oil and
Gas: Amendment to Section 932-10-S99, which makes a technical correction in ASC 932-10-S99-5
related to an SEC Observer comment, regarding the accounting and disclosures for gas balancing
arrangements. The ASU amends FASB ASC 932-10-S99-5 because the SEC staff has not taken a position
on whether the entitlements method or sales method is preferable for gas-balancing arrangements as
defined in FASB ASC 932-815-55-1 and FASB ASC 932-815-55-2 that do not meet the definition of a
derivative.
With the entitlements method, sales revenue is recognized to the extent of each well
partners proportionate share of gas sold regardless of which partner sold the gas. Under the
sales method, sales revenue is recognized for all gas sold by a partner even if the partners
ownership is less than 100% of the gas sold.
ASU 2009-11 included an instruction in FASB ASC 932-10-S99-5 that public companies must
account for all significant gas imbalances consistently using one accounting method. Both the
method and any significant amount of imbalances in units and value should be disclosed in
regulatory filings. The Company currently accounts for all gas balances under the sales method and
makes all required disclosures.
Recent developments in reserves reporting. In December 2008, the SEC released Final Rule,
Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting (the Reserve Ruling). The Reserve Ruling revises oil and
natural gas reporting disclosures. The Reserve Ruling permits the use of new technologies to
determine proved reserves estimates if those technologies have been demonstrated empirically to
lead to reliable conclusions about reserve volume estimates. The Reserve Ruling will also allow,
but not require, companies to disclose their probable and possible reserves to investors in
documents filed with the SEC. In addition, the new disclosure requirements require companies to:
(i) report the independence and qualifications of its reserves preparer or auditor; (ii) file
reports when a third party is relied upon to prepare reserves estimates or conduct a reserves
audit; and (iii) report oil and natural gas reserves using an average price based upon the prior
12-month period rather than a year-end price. The Reserve Ruling becomes effective for fiscal
years ending on or after December 31, 2009. The Company is currently assessing the impact that
adoption of the provisions of the Reserve Ruling will have on its financial position, results of
operations and disclosures.
8
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
Note C. Exploratory well costs
The Company capitalizes exploratory well costs until a determination is made that the well has
either found proved reserves or that it is impaired. The capitalized exploratory well costs are
presented in unproved properties in the consolidated balance sheets. If the exploratory well is
determined to be impaired, the well costs are charged to expense.
The following table reflects the Companys capitalized exploratory well activity during the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
(in thousands) |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
Beginning capitalized exploratory well costs |
|
$ |
7,304 |
|
|
$ |
25,553 |
|
Additions to exploratory well costs pending the determination of proved reserves |
|
|
35,822 |
|
|
|
129,664 |
|
Reclassifications due to determination of proved reserves |
|
|
(30,474 |
) |
|
|
(142,114 |
) |
Exploratory well costs charged to expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(451 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending capitalized exploratory well costs |
|
$ |
12,652 |
|
|
$ |
12,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides an aging, at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, of
capitalized exploratory well costs based on the date drilling was completed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Wells in drilling progress |
|
$ |
2,958 |
|
|
$ |
7,765 |
|
Capitalized exploratory well costs that have been
capitalized for a period of one year or less |
|
|
9,694 |
|
|
|
17,788 |
|
Capitalized exploratory well costs that have been
capitalized for a period greater than one year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalized exploratory well costs |
|
$ |
12,652 |
|
|
$ |
25,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2009, the Company had eleven gross exploratory wells waiting on completion,
seven of which were in the Companys New Mexico Permian area, three of which were in the Companys
Texas Permian area and one was in the Companys emerging play in North Dakota. At September 30,
2009, the Company had five gross exploratory wells drilling in the following areas: one in the New
Mexico Permian area, one in the Texas Permian area, one in the emerging play in North Dakota and
two in the Lower Abo oil play in New Mexico.
Note D. Acquisitions
Henry Entities acquisition. On July 31, 2008, the Company closed the acquisition of Henry
Petroleum LP and certain entities affiliated with Henry Petroleum LP (the Henry Entities) and
additional non-operated interests in oil and natural gas properties from persons affiliated with
the Henry Entities. In August 2008 and September 2008, the Company acquired additional
non-operated interests in oil and natural gas properties from persons affiliated with the Henry
Entities. The assets acquired in the Henry Entities acquisition, including the additional
non-operated interests, are referred to as the Henry Properties. The Company paid $583.7 million
in cash for the Henry Properties acquisition.
The cash paid for the Henry Properties acquisition was funded with (i) borrowings under the
Companys credit facility and (ii) proceeds from a private placement of approximately 8.3 million
shares of the Companys common stock.
9
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
The Henry Properties acquisition was being accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting for business combinations. Under the purchase method of accounting, the Company recorded
the Henry Properties assets and liabilities at fair value. The purchase price of the acquired
Henry Properties net assets is based on the total value of the cash consideration.
The following tables represent the allocation of the total purchase price of the Henry
Properties to the acquired assets and liabilities of the Henry Properties and the consideration
paid for the Henry Properties. The allocation represents the fair values assigned to each of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of Henry Properties net assets: |
|
|
|
|
Current assets, net of cash acquired of $19,049 (a) |
|
$ |
86,005 |
|
Proved oil and natural gas properties |
|
|
593,634 |
|
Unproved oil and natural gas properties |
|
|
233,527 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
7,392 |
|
Intangible assets operating rights |
|
|
38,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
|
959,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
(114,394 |
) |
Asset retirement obligations and other long-term liabilities |
|
|
(7,529 |
) |
Noncurrent derivative liabilities |
|
|
(39,037 |
) |
Deferred tax liability |
|
|
(214,640 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed |
|
|
(375,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net purchase price |
|
$ |
583,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration paid for Henry Properties net assets: |
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration paid, net of cash acquired of $19,049 |
|
$ |
578,025 |
|
Acquisition costs (b) |
|
|
5,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
$ |
583,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes a deferred tax asset of approximately $9.0 million. |
|
(b) |
|
Acquisition costs include legal and accounting fees, advisory fees and other
acquisition-related costs. |
10
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
The following unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial data for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008 was derived from the historical financial statements of the Company
and Henry Properties giving effect to the acquisition as if it had occurred on January 1, 2008.
The unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial data has been included for comparative
purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the results that might have occurred had the
Henry Properties acquisition taken place as of the date indicated and is not intended to be a
projection of future results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
509,976 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
134,959 |
|
Earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.57 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
Note E. Asset retirement obligations
The Companys asset retirement obligations represent the estimated present value of the
estimated cash flows the Company will incur to plug, abandon and remediate its producing properties
at the end of their production lives, in accordance with applicable state laws. The Company does
not provide for a market risk premium associated with asset retirement obligations because a
reliable estimate cannot be determined. The Company has no assets that are legally restricted for
purposes of settling asset retirement obligations.
The following table summarizes the Companys asset retirement obligations (ARO) recorded
during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Asset retirement obligations, beginning of period |
|
$ |
14,386 |
|
|
$ |
10,356 |
|
|
$ |
16,809 |
|
|
$ |
9,418 |
|
Liabilities incurred from new wells |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
660 |
|
Liabilities incurred in acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,062 |
|
Accretion expense |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
799 |
|
|
|
571 |
|
Disposition of wells sold |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Liabilities settled upon plugging and
abandoning wells |
|
|
(630 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(983 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Revision of estimates |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(2,670 |
) |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations, end of period |
|
$ |
14,134 |
|
|
$ |
18,061 |
|
|
$ |
14,134 |
|
|
$ |
18,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note F. Stockholders equity
Common stock private placement. On June 5, 2008, the Company entered into a common stock
purchase agreement with certain unaffiliated third-party investors to sell certain shares of the
Companys common stock in a private placement (the Private Placement) contemporaneous with the
closing of the Henry Properties acquisition. On July 31, 2008, the Company issued 8,302,894 shares
of its common stock at $30.11 per share. The Private Placement resulted in net proceeds of
approximately $242.4 million to the Company, after payment of approximately $7.6 million for the
fee paid to the placement agent.
11
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
Treasury stock. The restrictions on certain restricted stock awards issued to certain of the
Companys executive officers lapsed during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.
Immediately upon the lapse of restrictions, these executive officers became liable for certain
federal income taxes on the value of such shares. In accordance with the Companys 2006 Stock
Incentive Plan and the applicable restricted stock award agreements, some of such officers elected
to deliver shares of the Companys common stock to the Company in exchange for cash used to satisfy
such tax liability. In total, at September 30, 2009, the Company acquired 12,380 shares that are
held as treasury stock in the approximate amount of $417,000.
Note G. Incentive plans
Defined contribution plan. The Company sponsors a 401(k) defined contribution plan for the
benefit of all employees and maintains certain other acquired plans. The Company matches 100
percent of employee contributions, not to exceed 6 percent of the employees salary. The Companys
contributions to the plans for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were
approximately $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively, and $0.8 million and $0.5 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Stock incentive plan. The Companys 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (together with applicable
option agreements and restricted stock agreements, the Plan) provides for granting stock options
and restricted stock awards to employees and individuals associated with the Company. The
following table shows the number of awards available under the Companys Plan at September 30,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Common Shares |
|
Approved and authorized awards |
|
|
5,850,000 |
|
Restricted stock grants, net of forfeitures |
|
|
(776,611 |
) |
Stock option grants, net of forfeitures |
|
|
(3,463,985 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Awards available for future grant |
|
|
1,609,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock awards. All restricted shares are treated as issued and outstanding in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets. If an employee terminates employment prior to the date
restrictions lapse, restricted shares awarded to such employee as to which restrictions have not
lapsed are forfeited and cancelled and are no longer considered issued and outstanding. A summary
of the
Companys restricted stock awards activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 is
presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Restricted |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Shares |
|
Per Share |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
407,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares granted |
|
|
268,398 |
|
|
$ |
25.53 |
|
Shares cancelled / forfeited |
|
|
(4,596 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Lapse of restrictions |
|
|
(193,358 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
477,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
The following table summarizes information about stock-based compensation for the Companys
restricted stock awards for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Grant date fair value for awards during the period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee grants |
|
$ |
382 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,002 |
|
|
$ |
1,989 |
|
Officer and director grants (a) |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
1,934 |
|
|
|
1,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
466 |
|
|
$ |
577 |
|
|
$ |
6,936 |
|
|
$ |
3,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense from restricted stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee grants |
|
$ |
793 |
|
|
$ |
514 |
|
|
$ |
2,185 |
|
|
$ |
1,212 |
|
Officer and director grants (a) |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
1,248 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,233 |
|
|
$ |
716 |
|
|
$ |
3,433 |
|
|
$ |
1,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes and other information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit related to restricted stock |
|
$ |
137 |
|
|
$ |
276 |
|
|
$ |
1,064 |
|
|
$ |
617 |
|
Deductions in current taxable income related to restricted stock |
|
$ |
699 |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
5,066 |
|
|
$ |
1,268 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 includes effects of modifications to
certain stock-based awards, see further discussion below. |
Stock option awards. A summary of the Companys stock option award activity under the Plan
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Number of |
|
Exercise |
|
|
Options |
|
Price |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
2,731,324 |
|
|
$ |
12.46 |
|
Options granted |
|
|
120,301 |
|
|
$ |
20.75 |
|
Options exercised |
|
|
(512,876 |
) |
|
$ |
8.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
2,338,749 |
|
|
$ |
13.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested at end of period |
|
|
1,639,459 |
|
|
$ |
10.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and exercisable at end of period |
|
|
814,467 |
|
|
$ |
13.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
The following table summarizes information about the Companys vested and exercisable stock
options outstanding at September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Life |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Vested options: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise price |
|
$ |
8.00 |
|
|
|
1,121,212 |
|
|
2.38 years |
|
$ |
8.00 |
|
|
$ |
31,753 |
|
Exercise price |
|
$ |
12.00 |
|
|
|
118,681 |
|
|
4.63 years |
|
$ |
12.00 |
|
|
|
2,886 |
|
Exercise price |
|
$ |
14.84 |
|
|
|
263,750 |
|
|
6.96 years |
|
$ |
14.84 |
|
|
|
5,664 |
|
Exercise price |
|
$ |
21.84 |
|
|
|
102,250 |
|
|
8.42 years |
|
$ |
21.84 |
|
|
|
1,481 |
|
Exercise price |
|
$ |
31.81 |
|
|
|
33,566 |
|
|
8.76 years |
|
$ |
31.81 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,639,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
10.74 |
|
|
$ |
41,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and exercisable options: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise price |
|
$ |
8.00 |
|
|
|
332,181 |
|
|
3.89 years |
|
$ |
8.00 |
|
|
$ |
9,407 |
|
Exercise price |
|
$ |
12.00 |
|
|
|
82,720 |
|
|
5.88 years |
|
$ |
12.00 |
|
|
|
2,012 |
|
Exercise price |
|
$ |
14.84 |
|
|
|
263,750 |
|
|
6.96 years |
|
$ |
14.84 |
|
|
|
5,664 |
|
Exercise price |
|
$ |
21.84 |
|
|
|
102,250 |
|
|
8.42 years |
|
$ |
21.84 |
|
|
|
1,481 |
|
Exercise price |
|
$ |
31.81 |
|
|
|
33,566 |
|
|
8.76 years |
|
$ |
31.81 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
814,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13.34 |
|
|
$ |
18,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
The following table summarizes information about stock-based compensation for stock
options for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Grant date fair value for awards during the period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee grants |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
206 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
389 |
|
Officer and director grants (a) |
|
|
2,907 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
4,361 |
|
|
|
5,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,957 |
|
|
$ |
791 |
|
|
$ |
4,411 |
|
|
$ |
6,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense from stock options: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee grants |
|
$ |
132 |
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
$ |
273 |
|
|
$ |
113 |
|
Performance vesting options- officers |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
Officer and director grants (a) |
|
|
1,161 |
|
|
|
1,012 |
|
|
|
2,862 |
|
|
|
2,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,315 |
|
|
$ |
1,209 |
|
|
$ |
3,228 |
|
|
$ |
3,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes and other information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit related to stock options |
|
$ |
194 |
|
|
$ |
461 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,319 |
|
Deductions in current taxable income related to stock options exercised |
|
$ |
1,729 |
|
|
$ |
2,880 |
|
|
$ |
8,886 |
|
|
$ |
8,218 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 includes effects of modifications to
certain stock-based awards, see further discussion below. |
In calculating compensation expense for stock options granted during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, the Company estimated the fair value of each grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model. Assumptions utilized in the model are shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.47 |
% |
Expected term (years) |
|
|
6.25 |
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
63.19 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
The Company used the simplified method that is accepted by the SEC staff to calculate the
expected term for stock options granted during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009,
since it does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which
to estimate expected term due to the limited period of time its shares of common stock have been
publicly traded. Expected volatilities are based on a combination of historical and implied
volatilities of comparable companies.
Modification of stock-based awards. Steven L. Beal, the Companys former President and Chief
Operating Officer, retired from such positions on June 30, 2009. Mr. Beal began serving as a
consultant on July 1, 2009; see Note M. As part of the consulting agreement, certain of Mr. Beals stock-based awards were modified to permit vesting and exercise under the original terms of the stock-based awards as if Mr. Beal was still an
employee of the Company while he is performing consulting services for the Company. As a result of this modification, the Company (i) immediately recognized $0.4 million of
stock-based compensation during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and (ii) will
recognize additional stock-based compensation of $1.3 million in future periods.
15
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
Future stock-based compensation expense. Future stock-based compensation expense at September
30, 2009 is summarized in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Stock |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Remaining 2009 |
|
$ |
1,200 |
|
|
$ |
1,059 |
|
|
$ |
2,259 |
|
2010 |
|
|
3,612 |
|
|
|
2,279 |
|
|
|
5,891 |
|
2011 |
|
|
2,231 |
|
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
3,158 |
|
2012 |
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
881 |
|
2013 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,766 |
|
|
$ |
4,482 |
|
|
$ |
12,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note H. Disclosures about fair value measurements
The Company uses a valuation framework based upon inputs that market participants use in
pricing an asset or liability, which are classified into two categories: observable inputs and
unobservable inputs. Observable inputs represent market data obtained from independent sources,
whereas unobservable inputs reflect a companys own market assumptions, which are used if
observable inputs are not reasonably available without undue cost and effort. These two types of
inputs are further prioritized into the following fair value input hierarchy:
|
|
|
Level 1: |
|
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the
measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities. The Company considers
active markets to be those in which transactions for the assets or liabilities occur in
sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. |
|
|
|
Level 2: |
|
Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs which are observable,
either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
This category includes those derivative instruments that the Company values using
observable market data. Substantially all of these inputs are observable in the
marketplace throughout the full term of the derivative instrument, can be derived from
observable data, or supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in
the marketplace. Level 2 instruments primarily include non-exchange traded derivatives
such as over-the-counter commodity price swaps, basis swaps, investments and interest
rate swaps. The Companys valuation models are primarily industry-standard models that
consider various inputs including: (i) quoted forward prices for commodities, (ii) time
value and (iii) current market and contractual prices for the underlying instruments, as
well as other relevant economic measures. The Company utilizes its counterparties
valuations to assess the reasonableness of its prices and valuation techniques. |
|
|
|
Level 3: |
|
Measured based on prices or valuation models that require inputs that are both
significant to the fair value measurement and less observable from objective sources
(i.e., supported by little or no market activity). Level 3 instruments primarily include
derivative instruments, such as commodity price collars and floors, as well as
investments. The Companys valuation models are primarily industry-standard models that
consider various inputs including: (i) quoted forward prices for commodities, (ii) time
value, (iii) volatility factors and (iv) current market and contractual prices for the
underlying instruments, as well as other relevant economic measures. Although the
Company utilizes its counterparties valuations to assess the reasonableness of our
prices and valuation techniques, the Company does not have sufficient corroborating
market evidence to support classifying these assets and liabilities as Level 2. |
16
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
The fair value input hierarchy level to which an asset or liability measurement in its
entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the measurement
in its entirety. The following table presents the Companys assets and liabilities that are
measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2009, for each of the fair value
hierarchy levels:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value measurements at reporting date using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted prices in |
|
|
other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
active markets for |
|
|
observable |
|
|
unobservable |
|
|
Fair value at |
|
|
|
identical assets |
|
|
inputs |
|
|
inputs |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivative price swap contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
62,723 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
62,723 |
|
Commodity derivative price collar contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,078 |
|
|
|
10,078 |
|
Interest rate derivative swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,015 |
|
|
|
10,078 |
|
|
|
74,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivative price swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58,186 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58,186 |
) |
Commodity derivative basis swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,483 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,483 |
) |
Interest rate derivative swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,020 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,020 |
) |
Commodity derivative price collar contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,989 |
) |
|
|
(3,989 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69,689 |
) |
|
|
(3,989 |
) |
|
|
(73,678 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial assets (liabilities) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(5,674 |
) |
|
$ |
6,089 |
|
|
$ |
415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the fair value of financial
assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy:
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
49,562 |
|
Realized and unrealized losses |
|
|
(9,429 |
) |
Purchases, issuances, and settlements |
|
|
(34,044 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
6,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total losses for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized
losses relating to assets
still held at the reporting date |
|
$ |
(43,473 |
) |
|
|
|
|
17
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following table presents the carrying amounts and fair values of the Companys financial
instruments at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
(in thousands) |
|
value |
|
value |
|
value |
|
value |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments |
|
$ |
40,132 |
|
|
$ |
40,132 |
|
|
$ |
174,306 |
|
|
$ |
174,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative instruments |
|
$ |
39,717 |
|
|
$ |
39,717 |
|
|
$ |
1,866 |
|
|
$ |
1,866 |
|
Credit facility |
|
$ |
350,000 |
|
|
$ |
324,342 |
|
|
$ |
630,000 |
|
|
$ |
553,645 |
|
8.625% senior notes due 2017 |
|
$ |
295,747 |
|
|
$ |
307,500 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other current assets, accounts payable,
interest payable and other current liabilities. The carrying amounts approximate fair value due to
the short maturity of these instruments.
Credit facility. The fair value of the Companys credit facility is estimated by discounting
the principal and interest payments at the Companys credit adjusted discount rate. The fair value
at September 30, 2009 was approximately $324.3 million based on outstanding borrowings of $350
million and approximately $553.6 million at December 31, 2008 based on outstanding borrowings of
$630 million.
Senior notes. The fair value of the Companys senior notes are based on quoted market prices.
Derivative instruments. The fair value of the Companys derivative instruments are estimated
by management considering various factors, including closing exchange and over-the-counter
quotations and the time value of the underlying commitments. Financial assets and liabilities are
classified based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The Companys assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement
requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of the fair value of assets and liabilities and
their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels. The following table (i) summarizes the
valuation of each of the Companys financial instruments by required pricing levels and (ii)
summarizes the gross fair value by the appropriate balance sheet classification, even when the
derivative instruments are subject to netting arrangements and qualify for net presentation in the
Companys consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
18
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value measurements using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
prices |
|
|
other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
carrying value |
|
|
|
in active |
|
|
observable |
|
|
unobservable |
|
|
at |
|
|
|
markets |
|
|
inputs |
|
|
inputs |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Assets (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current:(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivative price swap contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,580 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,580 |
|
Commodity derivative price collar contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,078 |
|
|
|
10,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,580 |
|
|
|
10,078 |
|
|
|
29,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent:(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivative price swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,143 |
|
Interest rate derivative swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current:(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivative price swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,432 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,432 |
) |
Commodity derivative basis swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,630 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,630 |
) |
Interest rate derivative swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,020 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,020 |
) |
Commodity derivative price collar contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,329 |
) |
|
|
(2,329 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,082 |
) |
|
|
(2,329 |
) |
|
|
(43,411 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent:(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivative price swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,754 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,754 |
) |
Commodity derivative basis swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,853 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,853 |
) |
Commodity derivative price collar contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,660 |
) |
|
|
(1,660 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,607 |
) |
|
|
(1,660 |
) |
|
|
(30,267 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial assets (liabilities) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(5,674 |
) |
|
$ |
6,089 |
|
|
$ |
415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Total current financial assets (liabilities),
gross basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(13,753 |
) |
(b) Total noncurrent financial assets
(liabilities), gross basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial assets (liabilities) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value measurements using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
prices |
|
|
other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
carrying value |
|
|
|
in active |
|
|
observable |
|
|
unobservable |
|
|
at |
|
|
|
markets |
|
|
inputs |
|
|
inputs |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Assets (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current:(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivative price swap contracts |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
64,162 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
64,162 |
|
Commodity derivative price collar contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,562 |
|
|
|
49,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,162 |
|
|
|
49,562 |
|
|
|
113,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent:(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivative price swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,995 |
|
Interest rate derivative swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current:(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivative price swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivative basis swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(680 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(680 |
) |
Interest rate derivative swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,761 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,761 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,441 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,441 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent:(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivative price swap contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(516 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(516 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(516 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(516 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial assets (liabilities) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
122,878 |
|
|
$ |
49,562 |
|
|
$ |
172,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Total current financial assets
(liabilities), gross basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
111,283 |
|
(b) Total noncurrent financial assets
(liabilities), gross basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial assets (liabilities) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
172,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The fair value of derivative instruments reported in the Companys consolidated balance
sheets are subject to netting arrangements and qualify for net presentation. The following
table reports the net basis derivative fair values as reported in the consolidated balance
sheets at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Classification: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current derivative contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
$ |
9,405 |
|
|
$ |
113,149 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
(23,158 |
) |
|
|
(1,866 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net current |
|
$ |
(13,753 |
) |
|
$ |
111,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent derivative contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
$ |
30,727 |
|
|
$ |
61,157 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
(16,559 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net noncurrent |
|
$ |
14,168 |
|
|
$ |
61,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
Certain assets and liabilities are reported at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in the
Companys consolidated balance sheets. The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate
the fair values:
Impairments of long-lived assets The Company reviews its long-lived assets to be held and
used, including proved oil and gas properties, whenever events or circumstances indicate that the
carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is indicated if the sum
of the expected future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the assets. In this
circumstance, the Company recognizes an impairment loss for the amount by which the carrying amount
of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset. The Company reviews its oil and gas
properties by amortization base or by individual well for those wells not constituting part of an
amortization base. For each property determined to be impaired, an impairment loss equal to the
difference between the carrying value of the properties and the estimated fair value (discounted
future cash flows) of the properties would be recognized at that time. Estimating future cash flows
involves the use of judgments, including estimation of the proved and unproved oil and gas reserve
quantities, timing of development and production, expected future commodity prices, capital
expenditures and production costs.
The Company periodically reviews its proved oil and gas properties that are sensitive to oil
and natural gas prices for impairment. Due to downward adjustments to the economically recoverable
resource potential associated with declines in commodity prices and well performance, the Company
recognized impairment expense of $1.1 million and $9.7 million for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, respectively, related to its proved oil and gas properties. For the three
months ended September 30, 2009, the impaired assets, which had a total carrying amount of $1.7
million, were reduced to their estimated fair value of $0.6 million. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, the impaired assets, which had a total carrying amount of $15.9 million, were
reduced to their estimated fair value of $6.2 million.
Asset Retirement Obligations The Company estimates the fair value of AROs based on
discounted cash flow projections using numerous estimates, assumptions and judgments regarding such
factors as the existence of a legal obligation for an ARO; amounts and timing of settlements; the
credit-adjusted risk-free rate to be used; and inflation rates. See Note E for a summary of changes
in AROs.
21
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
Measurement information for assets that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis was
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value measurements using |
|
|
|
|
Quoted |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
prices |
|
other |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
in active |
|
observable |
|
unobservable |
|
Total |
|
|
markets |
|
inputs |
|
inputs |
|
Impairment |
(in thousands) |
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
|
Loss |
|
Three months ended September 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
629 |
|
|
$ |
(1,131 |
) |
Asset retirement obligations incurred in current period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,068 |
|
|
$ |
(2,758 |
) |
Asset retirement obligations incurred in current period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,249 |
|
|
$ |
(9,686 |
) |
Asset retirement obligations incurred in current period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,075 |
|
|
$ |
(2,827 |
) |
Asset retirement obligations incurred in current period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
22
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
Note I. Derivative financial instruments
The Company uses derivative financial contracts to manage exposures to commodity price and
interest rate fluctuations. Commodity hedges are used to (i) reduce the effect of the volatility of
price changes on the natural gas and oil the Company produces and sells, (ii) support the Companys
capital budget and expenditure plans and (iii) support the economics associated with acquisitions.
Interest rate hedges are used to mitigate the cash flow risk associated with rising interest rates.
The Company does not enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading
purposes. The Company also may enter into physical delivery contracts to effectively provide
commodity price hedges. Because these contracts are not expected to be net cash settled, they are
considered to be normal sales contracts and not derivatives. Therefore, these contracts are not
recorded in the Companys consolidated financial statements.
Currently, the Company does not designate its derivative instruments to qualify for hedge
accounting. Accordingly, the Company reflects changes in the fair value of its derivative
instruments in its statements of operations. All of the Companys remaining hedges that
historically qualified for hedge accounting or were dedesignated from hedge accounting were settled
in 2008.
23
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
New commodity derivatives contracts in 2009. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
the Company entered into additional commodity derivative contracts to hedge a portion of its
estimated future production. The following table summarizes information about these additional
commodity derivative contracts. When aggregating multiple contracts, the weighted average contract price is disclosed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
Index |
|
Contract |
|
|
Volume |
|
Price |
|
Period |
|
Oil (volumes in Bbls): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price collar |
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
$ |
45.00 - $49.00 |
(a) |
|
|
3/1/09 - 5/31/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price swap |
|
|
960,000 |
|
|
$ |
59.44 |
(a) |
|
|
7/1/09 - 12/31/09 |
|
Price swap |
|
|
273,000 |
|
|
$ |
67.50 |
(a) |
|
|
8/1/09 - 12/31/09 |
|
Price swap |
|
|
3,307,000 |
|
|
$ |
63.44 |
(a) |
|
|
1/1/10 - 12/31/10 |
|
Price swap |
|
|
2,601,000 |
|
|
$ |
71.66 |
(a) |
|
|
1/1/11 - 12/31/11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (volumes in MMBtus): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price collar |
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
5.00 - $5.81 |
(b) |
|
|
10/1/09 - 12/31/09 |
|
Price collar |
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
5.00 - $5.81 |
(b) |
|
|
1/1/10 - 3/31/10 |
|
Price collar |
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
5.25 - $5.75 |
(b) |
|
|
4/1/10 - 9/30/10 |
|
Price collar |
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
6.00 - $6.80 |
(b) |
|
|
10/1/10 - 12/31/10 |
|
Price collar |
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
6.00 - $6.80 |
(b) |
|
|
1/1/11 - 3/31/11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price swap |
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
4.31 |
(b) |
|
|
4/1/09 - 9/30/09 |
|
Price swap |
|
|
1,050,000 |
|
|
$ |
4.66 |
(b) |
|
|
7/1/09 - 12/31/09 |
|
Price swap |
|
|
6,810,000 |
|
|
$ |
6.13 |
(b) |
|
|
1/1/10 - 12/31/10 |
|
Price swap |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
$ |
7.29 |
(b) |
|
|
1/1/11 - 3/31/11 |
|
Price swap |
|
|
5,400,000 |
|
|
$ |
6.96 |
(b) |
|
|
4/1/11 - 12/31/11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis swap |
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
(c) |
|
|
7/1/09 - 9/30/09 |
|
Basis swap |
|
|
450,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.89 |
(c) |
|
|
10/1/09 - 12/31/09 |
|
Basis swap |
|
|
8,400,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
(c) |
|
|
1/1/10 - 12/31/10 |
|
Basis swap |
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
(c) |
|
|
1/1/11 - 3/31/11 |
|
Basis swap |
|
|
5,400,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
(c) |
|
|
4/1/11 - 12/31/11 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The index prices for the oil price swaps and collars are based on the NYMEX-West Texas Intermediate monthly average futures price. |
|
(b) |
|
The index prices for the natural gas price swaps and collars are based on the NYMEX-Henry Hub last trading day futures price. |
|
(c) |
|
The basis differential between the El Paso Permian delivery point and NYMEX Henry Hub delivery point. |
24
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
In October 2009, the Company entered into the following oil and natural gas price swaps
to hedge an additional portion of its estimated future production:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
Index |
|
Contract |
|
|
Volume |
|
Price |
|
Period |
|
Oil (volumes in Bbls): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price swap |
|
|
540,000 |
|
|
$ |
80.33 |
(a) |
|
|
1/1/10 - 12/31/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (volumes in MMBtus): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price swap |
|
|
1,504,000 |
|
|
$ |
6.11 |
(b) |
|
|
1/1/10 - 12/31/10 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The index price for the oil price swap is based on the NYMEX-West Texas Intermediate monthly average futures price. |
|
(b) |
|
The index prices for the natural gas price swaps and collars are based on the NYMEX-Henry Hub last trading day futures price. |
25
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
Commodity derivative contracts at September 30, 2009. The following table sets forth the
Companys outstanding commodity derivative contracts at
September 30, 2009. When aggregating multiple contracts, the weighted average contract price is disclosed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
Second |
|
Third |
|
Fourth |
|
|
|
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Total |
|
Oil Swaps: (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume (Bbl) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,028,473 |
|
|
|
1,028,473 |
|
Price per Bbl |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
72.31 |
|
|
$ |
72.31 |
|
2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume (Bbl) |
|
|
1,099,436 |
|
|
|
1,013,436 |
|
|
|
944,436 |
|
|
|
891,436 |
|
|
|
3,948,744 |
|
Price per Bbl |
|
$ |
68.21 |
|
|
$ |
68.27 |
|
|
$ |
68.32 |
|
|
$ |
68.37 |
|
|
$ |
68.29 |
|
2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume (Bbl) |
|
|
844,436 |
|
|
|
805,436 |
|
|
|
770,436 |
|
|
|
738,436 |
|
|
|
3,158,744 |
|
Price per Bbl |
|
$ |
77.24 |
|
|
$ |
77.44 |
|
|
$ |
77.65 |
|
|
$ |
77.85 |
|
|
$ |
77.53 |
|
2012: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume (Bbl) |
|
|
126,000 |
|
|
|
126,000 |
|
|
|
126,000 |
|
|
|
126,000 |
|
|
|
504,000 |
|
Price per Bbl |
|
$ |
127.80 |
|
|
$ |
127.80 |
|
|
$ |
127.80 |
|
|
$ |
127.80 |
|
|
$ |
127.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil Collars: (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume (Bbl) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192,000 |
|
|
|
192,000 |
|
Price per Bbl |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
120.00 - $134.60 |
|
|
$ |
120.00 - $134.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Swaps: (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume (MMBtu) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
460,000 |
|
|
|
460,000 |
|
Price per MMBtu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8.44 |
|
|
$ |
8.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Swaps: (c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume (MMBtu) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
450,000 |
|
|
|
450,000 |
|
Price per MMBtu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4.66 |
|
|
$ |
4.66 |
|
2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume (MMBtu) |
|
|
1,950,000 |
|
|
|
1,770,000 |
|
|
|
1,620,000 |
|
|
|
1,470,000 |
|
|
|
6,810,000 |
|
Price per MMBtu |
|
$ |
6.11 |
|
|
$ |
6.12 |
|
|
$ |
6.13 |
|
|
$ |
6.15 |
|
|
$ |
6.13 |
|
2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume (MMBtu) |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
|
|
5,700,000 |
|
Price per MMBtu |
|
$ |
7.29 |
|
|
$ |
6.96 |
|
|
$ |
6.96 |
|
|
$ |
6.96 |
|
|
$ |
6.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Collars: (c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume (MMBtu) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
Price per MMBtu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5.00 - $5.81 |
|
|
$ |
5.00 - $5.81 |
|
2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume (MMBtu) |
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
6,000,000 |
|
Price per MMBtu |
|
$ |
5.00 - $5.81 |
|
|
$ |
5.25 - $5.75 |
|
|
$ |
5.25 - $5.75 |
|
|
$ |
6.00 - $6.80 |
|
|
$ |
5.38 - $6.03 |
|
2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume (MMBtu) |
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
Price per MMBtu |
|
$ |
6.00 - $6.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6.00 - $6.80 |
|
26
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
|
Second |
|
Third |
|
Fourth |
|
|
|
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Quarter |
|
Total |
|
Natural Gas Basis Swaps: (d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume (MMBtu) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,968,000 |
|
|
|
1,968,000 |
|
Price per MMBtu |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume (MMBtu) |
|
|
2,100,000 |
|
|
|
2,100,000 |
|
|
|
2,100,000 |
|
|
|
2,100,000 |
|
|
|
8,400,000 |
|
Price per MMBtu |
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
2011: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volume (MMBtu) |
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
|
|
7,200,000 |
|
Price per MMBtu |
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The index prices for the oil price swaps and collars are based on the NYMEX-West Texas Intermediate monthly average futures price. |
|
(b) |
|
The index price for the natural gas price swap is based on the Inside FERC-El Paso Permian Basin first-of-the-month spot price. |
|
(c) |
|
The index prices for the natural gas price swaps and collars are based on the NYMEX-Henry Hub last trading day futures price. |
|
(d) |
|
The basis differential between the El Paso Permian delivery point and NYMEX Henry Hub delivery point. |
Interest rate derivative contracts at September 30, 2009. The Company entered into an
interest rate swap which fixes the LIBOR interest rate on $300 million of the Companys debt under
its Credit Facility at 1.90 percent for three years, which commenced in May of 2009. For this
portion of the Companys debt under its Credit Facility, the all-in interest rate will be
calculated by adding the fixed rate of 1.90 percent to a margin that ranges from 2.00 percent to
3.00 percent depending on the amount of debt outstanding under its Credit Facility.
27
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
The Companys reported oil and natural gas revenue and average oil and natural gas prices
includes the effects of oil quality and Btu content, gathering and transportation costs, natural
gas processing and shrinkage, and the net effect of the commodity hedges that qualified for cash
flow hedge accounting. The following table summarizes the gains and losses reported in earnings
related to the commodity and interest rate derivative instruments and the net change in accumulated
other comprehensive income (AOCI) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Decrease in oil and natural gas revenue from derivative activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments on cash flow hedges in oil sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(12,111 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(32,684 |
) |
Dedesignated cash flow hedges reclassified from AOCI in natural gas sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total decrease in oil and natural gas revenue from derivative activity |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(12,149 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(32,944 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on derivatives not designated as hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark-to-market gain (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil |
|
$ |
(12,821 |
) |
|
$ |
160,148 |
|
|
$ |
(156,920 |
) |
|
$ |
71,248 |
|
Natural gas |
|
|
(8,442 |
) |
|
|
15,947 |
|
|
|
(13,460 |
) |
|
|
1,600 |
|
Interest rate derivatives |
|
|
(2,645 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,645 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash (payments) receipts on derivatives not designated as hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil |
|
|
13,971 |
|
|
|
(11,837 |
) |
|
|
70,383 |
|
|
|
(27,802 |
) |
Natural gas |
|
|
3,395 |
|
|
|
(946 |
) |
|
|
9,227 |
|
|
|
(1,368 |
) |
Interest rate derivatives |
|
|
(1,241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,020 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gain (loss) on derivatives not designated as hedges |
|
$ |
(7,783 |
) |
|
$ |
163,312 |
|
|
$ |
(94,435 |
) |
|
$ |
43,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain from ineffective portion of cash flow hedges |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
416 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark-to-market gain (loss) of cash flow hedges |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14,588 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(17,922 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment of losses to earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change, before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,762 |
|
Income tax effect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,441 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,776 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change, net of income taxes |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16,258 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedesignated cash flow hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustment of losses to earnings |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
260 |
|
Income tax effect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change, net of income taxes |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
Note J. Debt
The Companys debt consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Credit facility |
|
$ |
350,000 |
|
|
$ |
630,000 |
|
8.625% unsecured senior notes due 2017 |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less: unamortized original issue discount |
|
|
(4,253 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Less: current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
645,747 |
|
|
$ |
630,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit facility. The Companys credit facility, as amended, has a maturity date of July 31,
2013 (the Credit Facility). At September 30, 2009, the Company had letters of credit outstanding
under the Credit Facility of approximately $25,000 and its availability to borrow additional funds
was approximately $605.9 million. The Company obtained a waiver from lenders representing 95.4% of
the commitments under the Credit Facility in conjunction with the offering of the Senior Notes,
described below, to not reduce the borrowing base as required by the Credit Facility; as a result,
the Companys borrowing base was reduced to $955.9 million from $960 million. In October 2009, the
lenders reaffirmed the Companys $955.9 million borrowing base under the Credit Facility until the
next scheduled borrowing base redetermination in April 2010. Between scheduled borrowing base
redeterminations, the Company and, if requested by 66 2/3 percent of the lenders, the lenders, may
each request one special redetermination.
Advances on the Credit Facility bear interest, at the Companys option, based on (i) the prime
rate of JPMorgan Chase Bank (JPM Prime Rate) (3.25 percent at September 30, 2009) or (ii) a
Eurodollar rate (substantially equal to the London Interbank Offered Rate). At September 30, 2009,
the interest rates of Eurodollar rate advances and JPM Prime Rate advances vary, with interest
margins ranging from 200 to 300 basis points and 112.5 to 212.5 basis points, respectively, per
annum depending on the debt balance outstanding. At September 30, 2009, the Company pays
commitment fees on the unused portion of the available borrowing base of 50 basis points per annum.
The Credit Facility also includes a same-day advance facility under which the Company may
borrow funds from the administrative agent. Same-day advances cannot exceed $25 million and the
maturity dates cannot exceed fourteen days. The interest rate on this facility is the JPM Prime
Rate plus the applicable interest margin.
The Companys obligations under the Credit Facility are secured by a first lien on
substantially all of the Companys oil and natural gas properties. In addition, all of the
Companys subsidiaries are guarantors and all general partner, limited partner and membership
interests in the Companys subsidiaries owned by the Company have been pledged to secure borrowings
under the Credit Facility. The credit agreement contains various restrictive covenants and
compliance requirements which include (a) maintenance of certain financial ratios, including (i) a
quarterly ratio of total debt to consolidated earnings before interest expense, income taxes,
depletion, depreciation, and amortization, exploration expense and other noncash income and
expenses to be no greater than 4.0 to 1.0, and (ii) a ratio of current assets to current
liabilities, excluding noncash assets and liabilities related to financial derivatives and asset
retirement obligations and including the unfunded amounts under the Credit Facility, to be no less
than 1.0 to 1.0; (b) limits on the incurrence of additional indebtedness and certain types of
liens; (c) restrictions as to mergers, combinations and dispositions of assets; and
(d) restrictions on the payment of cash dividends. At September 30, 2009, the Company was in
compliance with its covenants under the Credit Facility.
8.625% unsecured senior notes. On September 18, 2009, the Company completed its public
offering of $300 million aggregate principal amount of 8.625% senior notes due 2017 (the Senior
Notes) at 98.578% of par. The Senior Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior
unsecured basis by all of the Companys subsidiaries.
29
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
The Senior Notes will mature on October 1, 2017, and interest is payable on the Senior Notes
each April 1 and October 1, commencing on April 1, 2010. The Company received net proceeds of
$288.2 million (net of related estimated offering costs), which were used to repay a portion of the
outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility.
The Company may redeem some or all of the Senior Notes at any time on or after October 1, 2013
at the redemption prices specified in the indenture. The Company may also redeem up to 35% of the
Senior Notes using all or a portion of the net proceeds of certain public sales of equity interests
completed before October 1, 2012 at a redemption price as specified in the indenture. If the
Company sells certain assets or experiences specific kinds of change of control, each as described
in the indenture, each holder of the
Senior Notes will have the right to require the Company to repurchase the Senior Notes at a
purchase price described in the indenture plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of
repurchase.
The Senior Notes are the Companys senior unsecured obligations, and rank equally in right of
payment with all of the Companys existing and future senior debt, and rank senior in right of
payment to all of the Companys future subordinated debt. The Senior Notes are structurally
subordinated to all of the Companys existing and future secured debt to the extent of the value of
the collateral securing such indebtedness.
Principal maturities of debt. Principal maturities of debt outstanding, excluding original
issue discount, at September 30, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining 2009 |
|
$ |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
350,000 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
650,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense. The following amounts have been incurred and charged to interest expense
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Cash payments for interest |
|
$ |
6,395 |
|
|
$ |
6,496 |
|
|
$ |
13,324 |
|
|
$ |
17,254 |
|
Amortization of original issue discount |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
Amortization of deferred loan origination costs |
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
2,596 |
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
Write-off of deferred loan origination costs and original issue discount |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
1,547 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
1,547 |
|
Net changes in accruals |
|
|
(524 |
) |
|
|
1,780 |
|
|
|
1,422 |
|
|
|
686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest costs incurred |
|
|
6,824 |
|
|
|
10,505 |
|
|
|
17,412 |
|
|
|
20,845 |
|
Less: capitalized interest |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(1,090 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
$ |
6,809 |
|
|
$ |
10,255 |
|
|
$ |
17,379 |
|
|
$ |
19,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note K. Commitments and contingencies
Severance agreements. The Company has entered into severance and change of control agreements
with all of its officers. The current annual salaries for the Companys officers covered under
such agreements total approximately $2.0 million.
30
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
Indemnifications. The Company has agreed to indemnify its directors and officers, with
respect to claims and damages arising from certain acts or omissions taken in such capacity.
Legal actions. The Company is a party to proceedings and claims incidental to its business.
While many of these matters involve inherent uncertainty, the Company believes that the amount of
the liability, if any, ultimately incurred with respect to any such proceedings or claims will not
have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial position as a whole or on
its liquidity, capital resources or future results of operations. The Company will continue to
evaluate proceedings and claims involving the Company on a quarter-by-quarter basis and will
establish and adjust any reserves as appropriate to reflect its assessment of the then current
status of the matters.
Acquisition commitments. In connection with the acquisition of the Henry Entities, the
Company agreed to pay certain employees, who were formerly employed by the Henry Entities, bonuses
of approximately $11.0 million in the aggregate at each of the first and second anniversaries of
the closing of the acquisition, respectively. Except as described below, these employees must
remain employed with the Company to receive the bonus. A former Henry Entities employee who is
otherwise entitled to a full bonus will receive the full bonus (i) if the Company terminates the
employee without cause, (ii) upon the death or disability of such employee or (iii) upon a change
in control of the Company. If any such employee resigns or is terminated for cause, the employee
will not receive the bonus and, subject to certain conditions, the Company will be required to
reimburse the sellers in the acquisition of the Henry Entities 65 percent of the bonus amount not
paid to the employee. The Company will reflect the bonus amounts to be paid to these employees as a
period cost, which will be included in the Companys results of operations over the period earned.
Amounts that ultimately are determined to be paid to the sellers will be treated as a contingent
purchase price and reflected as an adjustment to the purchase price. During the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recognized $2.4 million and $7.7 million,
respectively, of this obligation in its results of operations, and $0.2 million as contingent
purchase price. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company recognized
$2.4 million of the obligation in its results of operations and $0.7 million as contingent purchase
price.
Daywork commitments. The Company periodically enters into contractual arrangements under
which the Company is committed to expend funds to drill wells in the future, including agreements
to secure drilling rig services, which require the Company to make future minimum payments to the
rig operators. The Company records drilling commitments in the periods in which well capital is
incurred or rig services are provided. The following table summarizes the Companys future
drilling commitments at September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due By Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
1 - 3 |
|
|
3 - 5 |
|
|
More than |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
1 year |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
5 years |
|
|
Daywork drilling contracts with related parties (a) |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Daywork drilling contracts assumed in the Henry Properties acquisition (b) |
|
|
1,085 |
|
|
|
1,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual drilling commitments |
|
$ |
2,085 |
|
|
$ |
2,085 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Consists of daywork drilling contracts with Silver Oak Drilling, LLC, an affiliate of Chase Oil Corporation. |
|
(b) |
|
A major oil and gas company which owns an interest in the wells being drilled and the Company are parties to these contracts. Only the
Companys 25% share of the contract obligation has been reflected above. |
31
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
Operating leases. The Company leases vehicles, equipment and office facilities under
non-cancellable operating leases. Lease payments associated with these operating leases for the
three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were approximately $693,000 and $571,000,
respectively, and $1,946,000 and $851,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Future minimum lease commitments under non-cancellable operating leases at September
30, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining 2009 |
|
$ |
268 |
|
2010 |
|
|
1,077 |
|
2011 |
|
|
1,083 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1,077 |
|
2013 |
|
|
1,084 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
3,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
7,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note L. Income taxes
The Company uses an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting for
income taxes. The Companys objectives of accounting for income taxes are to recognize (i) the
amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and (ii) deferred tax liabilities and
assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in its financial
statements or tax returns. The Company and its subsidiaries file a federal corporate income tax
return on a consolidated basis. The tax returns and the amount of taxable income or loss are
subject to examination by federal and state taxing authorities. In determining the interim period
income tax provision, the Company utilizes an estimated annual effective tax rate.
At September 30, 2009, the Company did not have any significant uncertain tax positions
requiring recognition in the financial statements. The tax years 2004 through 2008 remain subject
to examination by the major tax jurisdictions.
32
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
Income tax provision. The Companys income tax provision and amounts separately allocated
were attributable to the following items for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
$ |
21,824 |
|
|
$ |
91,031 |
|
|
$ |
(11,973 |
) |
|
$ |
96,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred hedge gains (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,013 |
) |
Net settlement losses included in earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,891 |
|
Tax benefits related to stock-based compensation |
|
|
(365 |
) |
|
|
(738 |
) |
|
|
(3,357 |
) |
|
|
(2,884 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,459 |
|
|
$ |
100,749 |
|
|
$ |
(15,330 |
) |
|
$ |
99,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys income tax provision (benefit) attributable to income (loss) from operations
consisted of the following for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. federal |
|
$ |
2,766 |
|
|
$ |
7,620 |
|
|
$ |
8,060 |
|
|
$ |
8,234 |
|
U.S. state and local |
|
|
1,099 |
|
|
|
1,007 |
|
|
|
1,807 |
|
|
|
1,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,865 |
|
|
|
8,627 |
|
|
|
9,867 |
|
|
|
9,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. federal |
|
|
15,941 |
|
|
|
73,865 |
|
|
|
(19,162 |
) |
|
|
77,902 |
|
U.S. state and local |
|
|
2,018 |
|
|
|
8,539 |
|
|
|
(2,678 |
) |
|
|
9,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,959 |
|
|
|
82,404 |
|
|
|
(21,840 |
) |
|
|
86,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,824 |
|
|
$ |
91,031 |
|
|
$ |
(11,973 |
) |
|
$ |
96,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reconciliation between the tax expense computed by multiplying pretax income (loss) by the
U.S. federal statutory rate and the reported amounts of income tax expense (benefit) is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Income (loss) at U.S. federal statutory rate |
|
$ |
14,555 |
|
|
$ |
81,536 |
|
|
$ |
(13,529 |
) |
|
$ |
86,136 |
|
State income taxes (net of federal tax effect) |
|
|
1,762 |
|
|
|
9,546 |
|
|
|
(830 |
) |
|
|
10,094 |
|
Nondeductible expense & other |
|
|
5,507 |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
2,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
$ |
21,824 |
|
|
$ |
91,031 |
|
|
$ |
(11,973 |
) |
|
$ |
96,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
Note M. Related party transactions
Consulting Agreement. On June 30, 2009, Steven L. Beal, the Companys President and Chief
Operating Officer, retired from such positions. Mr. Beal was recently re-elected to the Companys
Board of Directors and continues to serve as a member of the Companys Board of Directors. On
June 9, 2009, the Company entered into a consulting agreement (the Consulting Agreement ) with
Mr. Beal, under which Mr. Beal began serving as a consultant to the Company on July 1, 2009. Either
the Company or Mr. Beal may terminate the consulting relationship at any time by giving ninety days
written notice to the other party; however, the Company may terminate the relationship immediately
for cause. During the term of the consulting relationship, Mr. Beal will receive a consulting fee
of $20,000 per month and a monthly reimbursement for his medical and dental coverage costs. If
Mr. Beal dies during the term of the Consulting Agreement, his estate will receive a $60,000 lump
sum payment. As part of the consulting agreement, certain of Mr. Beals stock-based awards were modified to permit vesting and exercise under the original terms of the stock-based awards as if
Mr. Beal was still an employee of the Company while he is performing consulting services for the Company.
Chase Group transactions. The Company incurred charges from Mack Energy Corporation (MEC),
an affiliate of Chase Oil Corporation (Chase Oil), of approximately $0.3 million and $0.2 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $1.0 million and
$1.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, for services
rendered in the ordinary course of business.
The Company had $38,000 in outstanding receivables due from MEC at September 30, 2009 and no
outstanding receivables due from MEC at December 31, 2008. The Company had $46,000 in outstanding
payables to MEC at September 30, 2009 and no outstanding payables to MEC at December 31, 2008.
Saltwater disposal services agreement. Among the assets the Company acquired from Chase Oil
is an undivided interest in a saltwater gathering and disposal system, which is owned and
maintained under a written agreement among the Company and Chase Oil and certain of its affiliates,
and under which the Company as operator gathers and disposes of produced water. The system is owned
jointly by the Company and Chase Oil and its affiliates in undivided ownership percentages, which
are annually redetermined as of January 1 on the basis of each partys percentage contribution of
the total volume of produced water disposed of through the system during the prior calendar year.
As of January 1, 2009, the Company owned 95.4% of the system and Chase Oil and its affiliates owned
4.6%.
Other related party transactions. The Company also has engaged in transactions with certain
other affiliates of Chase Oil, Caza Energy LLC (Caza) and certain other parties thereto
(collectively the Chase Group), including a drilling contractor, an oilfield services company, a
supply company, a drilling fluids supply company, a pipe and tubing supplier, a fixed base operator
of aircraft services and a software company.
The Company incurred charges from these related party vendors of approximately $5.3 million
and $6.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and
$17.9 million and $19.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
The Company had outstanding amounts payable to these related party vendors identified above of
approximately $0.4 million and $21,000 at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively,
which are reflected in accounts payablerelated parties in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets.
Overriding royalty and royalty interests. Certain members of the Chase Group own overriding
royalty interests in certain of the Chase Group properties. The amount paid attributable to such
interests was approximately $402,000 and $984,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively, and $901,000 and $2.6 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively. The Company owed these owners royalty payments of approximately $253,000 and
$146,000 at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Royalties are paid on certain properties located in Andrews County, Texas to a partnership of
which one of the Companys directors is the general partner and owner of a 3.5% partnership
interest. The Company paid this partnership approximately $39,000 and $115,000 for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $95,000 and $279,000 for the nine months
34
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company owed this partnership royalty payments of
approximately $13,000 at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
In April 2005, the Company acquired certain working interests in 46,861 gross (26,908 net)
acres located in Culberson County, Texas from an entity partially owned by a person who became an
executive officer of the Company immediately following such acquisition. In connection with this
acquisition, such entity retained a 2% overriding royalty interest in the acquired properties,
which overriding royalty interest later became owned equally by such officer and a non-officer
employee of the Company. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, no
payments were made related to this overriding royalty interest. Effective March 31, 2008, the
executive officer involved in this matter resigned from the Company.
Working interests owned by employees. As part of the Henry Properties acquisition, the Company
purchased oil and natural gas properties in which certain employees owned interests. The Company
distributed revenues to these employees totaling approximately $66,000 and $192,000 for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, and received joint interest payments from
these employees of approximately $95,000 and $979,000 for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2009, respectively. The Company distributed revenues to these employees totaling approximately
$34,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, and received joint interest
payments from these employees of approximately $635,000 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008.
At September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company was owed by these employees
approximately $100,000 and $300,000, respectively, which is reflected in accounts receivable -
related parties. The Company owed these employees revenue payments of approximately $13,000 at
September 30, 2009 and had no outstanding payables at December 31, 2008.
Note N. Net income (loss) per share
Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) applicable to
common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares treated as outstanding for the
period. All capital options were exercised prior to March 31, 2008.
The computation of diluted income (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that could
occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock that are dilutive to income (loss)
were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that
would then share in the earnings of the Company. These amounts include unexercised stock options
and restricted stock (as issued under the Plan and described in Note G). Potentially dilutive
effects are calculated using the treasury stock method.
The following table is a reconciliation of the basic weighted average common shares
outstanding to diluted weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
85,061 |
|
|
|
81,288 |
|
|
|
84,798 |
|
|
|
77,489 |
|
Dilutive capital options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
Dilutive common stock options |
|
|
789 |
|
|
|
1,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,203 |
|
Dilutive restricted stock |
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
86,088 |
|
|
|
82,724 |
|
|
|
84,798 |
|
|
|
78,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options equivalent to 65,891 and 96,555 shares of common stock were not included in the
computation of diluted income per share for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, as inclusion of these items would be antidilutive.
35
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the computation of diluted net loss per share
was anti-dilutive due to the net loss reported by the Company; therefore, the amounts reported for
basic and diluted net loss per share were the same. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009,
477,795 shares of restricted stock and 2,338,749 stock options were not included in the computation
of diluted loss per share, as inclusion of these items would be anti-dilutive.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the effects of all potentially dilutive
securities were included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because there were no
antidilutive effects.
Note O. Other current liabilities
The following table provides the components of the Companys other current liabilities at
September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Other current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued oil and natural gas related costs |
|
$ |
24,585 |
|
|
$ |
15,489 |
|
Payroll related matters |
|
|
8,364 |
|
|
|
11,290 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
1,775 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
1,473 |
|
|
|
2,611 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,532 |
|
|
|
8,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
$ |
42,204 |
|
|
$ |
38,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note P. Subsidiary Guarantors
All of the Companys wholly-owned subsidiaries have fully and unconditionally guaranteed the
Senior Notes of the Company (see Note J). In accordance with practices accepted by the SEC, the
Company has prepared Consolidating Condensed Financial Statements in order to quantify the assets
and results of operations of such subsidiaries as subsidiary guarantors. The following
Consolidating Condensed Balance Sheets at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, and
Consolidating Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008 and Consolidating Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008, present financial information for Concho Resources Inc. as the Parent on a
stand-alone basis (carrying any investments in subsidiaries under the equity method), financial
information for the subsidiary guarantors on a stand-alone basis (carrying any investment in
non-guarantor subsidiaries under the equity method), and the consolidation and elimination entries
necessary to arrive at the information for the Company on a consolidated basis. All current and
deferred taxes are recorded on Concho Resources Inc. as the subsidiaries are flow-through entities
for tax purposes. The subsidiary guarantors are not restricted from making distributions to the
Company.
36
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
Consolidating Condensed Balance Sheet
September 30, 2009
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Entries |
|
|
Total |
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable related parties |
|
$ |
1,718,424 |
|
|
$ |
2,683 |
|
|
$ |
(1,720,969 |
) |
|
$ |
138 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
20,010 |
|
|
|
158,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178,785 |
|
Total oil and natural gas properties, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,512,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,512,021 |
|
Total property and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,151 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
800,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(800,070 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total other long-term assets |
|
|
52,708 |
|
|
|
61,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,591,212 |
|
|
$ |
2,751,353 |
|
|
$ |
(2,521,039 |
) |
|
$ |
2,821,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable related parties |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,721,762 |
|
|
$ |
(1,720,969 |
) |
|
$ |
793 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
27,245 |
|
|
|
214,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241,440 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
605,520 |
|
|
|
15,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
620,846 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
645,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
645,747 |
|
Equity |
|
|
1,312,700 |
|
|
|
800,070 |
|
|
|
(800,070 |
) |
|
|
1,312,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
2,591,212 |
|
|
$ |
2,751,353 |
|
|
$ |
(2,521,039 |
) |
|
$ |
2,821,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidating Condensed Balance Sheet
December 31, 2008
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Entries |
|
|
Total |
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable related parties |
|
$ |
2,500,186 |
|
|
$ |
1,432,829 |
|
|
$ |
(3,932,701 |
) |
|
$ |
314 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
120,406 |
|
|
|
158,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
278,469 |
|
Total oil and natural gas properties, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,386,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,386,584 |
|
Total property and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,820 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries |
|
|
734,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(734,969 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total other long-term assets |
|
|
73,538 |
|
|
|
61,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
3,429,099 |
|
|
$ |
4,053,774 |
|
|
$ |
(4,667,670 |
) |
|
$ |
2,815,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable related parties |
|
$ |
860,758 |
|
|
$ |
3,072,255 |
|
|
$ |
(3,932,701 |
) |
|
$ |
312 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
39,424 |
|
|
|
231,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270,506 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
573,763 |
|
|
|
15,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
589,231 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
630,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
630,000 |
|
Equity |
|
|
1,325,154 |
|
|
|
734,969 |
|
|
|
(734,969 |
) |
|
|
1,325,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
3,429,099 |
|
|
$ |
4,053,774 |
|
|
$ |
(4,667,670 |
) |
|
$ |
2,815,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
Consolidating Condensed Statement of Operations
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Entries |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
153,494 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
153,494 |
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
(9,083 |
) |
|
|
(95,816 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(104,899 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
(9,083 |
) |
|
|
57,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,595 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(6,809 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,809 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
57,478 |
|
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
(57,478 |
) |
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
41,586 |
|
|
|
57,478 |
|
|
|
(57,478 |
) |
|
|
41,586 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(21,824 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,824 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
19,762 |
|
|
$ |
57,478 |
|
|
$ |
(57,478 |
) |
|
$ |
19,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidating Condensed Statement of Operations
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2008
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Entries |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
(12,150 |
) |
|
$ |
182,607 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
170,457 |
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
19,782 |
|
|
|
52,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
7,632 |
|
|
|
235,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
242,880 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(10,255 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,255 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
235,582 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
(235,577 |
) |
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
232,959 |
|
|
|
235,577 |
|
|
|
(235,577 |
) |
|
|
232,959 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(91,031 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91,031 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
141,928 |
|
|
$ |
235,577 |
|
|
$ |
(235,577 |
) |
|
$ |
141,928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
Consolidating Condensed Statement of Operations
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Entries |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
366,828 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
366,828 |
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
(86,376 |
) |
|
|
(301,379 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(387,755 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
(86,376 |
) |
|
|
65,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,927 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(17,379 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,379 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
65,101 |
|
|
|
(348 |
) |
|
|
(65,101 |
) |
|
|
(348 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
(38,654 |
) |
|
|
65,101 |
|
|
|
(65,101 |
) |
|
|
(38,654 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
11,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(26,681 |
) |
|
$ |
65,101 |
|
|
$ |
(65,101 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,681 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidating Condensed Statement of Operations
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Entries |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
(32,945 |
) |
|
$ |
447,496 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
414,551 |
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
19,638 |
|
|
|
(169,996 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150,358 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
(13,307 |
) |
|
|
277,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264,193 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(19,755 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,755 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
279,165 |
|
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
|
(279,160 |
) |
|
|
1,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
246,103 |
|
|
|
279,160 |
|
|
|
(279,160 |
) |
|
|
246,103 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(96,230 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96,230 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
149,873 |
|
|
$ |
279,160 |
|
|
$ |
(279,160 |
) |
|
$ |
149,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
Consolidating Condensed Statement of Cash Flows
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Entries |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
$ |
(91,954 |
) |
|
$ |
324,032 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
232,078 |
|
Net cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
77,590 |
|
|
|
(319,468 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(241,878 |
) |
Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
14,367 |
|
|
|
(6,624 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(2,060 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,057 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
15,692 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidating Condensed Statement of Cash Flows
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Consolidating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Entries |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
$ |
(514,355 |
) |
|
$ |
833,755 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
319,400 |
|
Net cash flows used in investing activities |
|
|
(26,175 |
) |
|
|
(809,263 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(835,438 |
) |
Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
540,938 |
|
|
|
(954 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
539,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
23,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,946 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
30,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
515 |
|
|
$ |
53,855 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
54,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note Q. Subsequent events
The Company has evaluated subsequent events through November 5, 2009, which was the date these
financial statements were issued.
40
Concho Resources Inc.
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2009
Unaudited
Note R. Supplementary information
Capitalized costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Oil and natural gas properties: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
$ |
2,706,933 |
|
|
$ |
2,316,330 |
|
Unproved |
|
|
273,335 |
|
|
|
377,244 |
|
Less: accumulated depletion |
|
|
(468,247 |
) |
|
|
(306,990 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net capitalized costs for oil and natural gas properties |
|
$ |
2,512,021 |
|
|
$ |
2,386,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs incurred for oil and natural gas producing activities (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Property acquisition costs:(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
$ |
(467 |
) |
|
$ |
589,986 |
|
|
$ |
(1,475 |
) |
|
$ |
589,987 |
|
Unproved |
|
|
7,618 |
|
|
|
223,892 |
|
|
|
12,200 |
|
|
|
225,241 |
|
Exploration |
|
|
26,065 |
|
|
|
30,131 |
|
|
|
111,005 |
|
|
|
80,638 |
|
Development |
|
|
64,554 |
|
|
|
78,477 |
|
|
|
179,783 |
|
|
|
149,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs incurred for oil and natural gas properties |
|
$ |
97,770 |
|
|
$ |
922,486 |
|
|
$ |
301,513 |
|
|
$ |
1,045,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The costs incurred for oil and natural gas producing activities includes the following
amounts of asset retirement obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Proved property acquisition costs |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,062 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,062 |
|
Exploration costs |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
Development costs |
|
|
(321 |
) |
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
(3,048 |
) |
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
(391 |
) |
|
$ |
7,435 |
|
|
$ |
(2,898 |
) |
|
$ |
8,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
|
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company adjusted the purchase
price allocation related to the acquisition of the Henry Properties. This adjustment reduced
the proved acquisition costs by $350,000 and $1,371,000 during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, respectively, while the unproved acquisition costs were increased by
$35,000 and $328,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. |
41
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion is intended to assist in understanding our business and results
of operations together with our present financial condition. This section should be read in
conjunction with our historical consolidated financial statements and notes, as well as the
selected historical consolidated financial data included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008.
During the third quarter of 2008, we closed a significant acquisition as discussed below. As
a result of the acquisition many comparisons between periods will be difficult or impossible.
Statements in this discussion may be forward-looking statements. These forward-looking
statements involve risks and uncertainties. We caution that a number of factors could cause future
production, revenue and expenses to differ materially from our expectations. See Cautionary
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.
Overview
We are an independent oil and natural gas company engaged in the acquisition, development,
exploitation and exploration of producing oil and natural gas properties. Our operations are
primarily focused in the Permian Basin of Southeast New Mexico and West Texas. We have also
acquired significant acreage positions in and are actively involved in drilling or participating in
drilling in emerging plays located in the Permian Basin of Southeast New Mexico and the Williston
Basin in North Dakota, where we are applying horizontal drilling and advanced fracture stimulation
techniques. Oil comprised 62.9 percent of our 137.3 MMBoe of estimated net proved reserves at
December 31, 2008, and 66.9 percent of our 8.1 MMBoe of production during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. We generally seek to operate the wells in which we own an interest, and we
operated wells that accounted for 93.1 percent of our proved developed producing PV-10 at December
31, 2008 and 65.6 percent of our 3,831 gross wells at September 30, 2009. By controlling
operations, we believe that we are able to more effectively manage the cost and timing of
exploration and development of our properties, including the drilling, completion and stimulation
methods used.
Commodity prices
Factors that may impact future commodity prices, including the price of oil and natural gas,
include:
|
|
|
developments generally impacting the Middle East, including Iraq and Iran; |
|
|
|
|
the extent to which members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and
other oil exporting nations are able to continue to manage oil supply through export
quotas; |
|
|
|
|
the overall global demand for oil; and |
|
|
|
|
overall North American natural gas supply and demand fundamentals, including: |
|
§ |
|
the impact of the decline of the United States economy, |
|
|
§ |
|
weather conditions, and |
|
|
§ |
|
liquefied natural gas deliveries to the United States. |
Although we cannot predict the occurrence of events that may affect future commodity prices or
the degree to which these prices will be affected, the prices for any commodity that we produce
will generally approximate current market prices in the geographic region of the production. From
time to time, we expect that we may hedge a portion of our commodity price risk to mitigate the
impact of price volatility on our business. See Note I of the Condensed Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements included in Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) for
additional information regarding our commodity hedge positions at September 30, 2009.
42
Oil prices in 2008 were high and particularly volatile compared to historical prices. In
addition, natural gas prices have been subject to significant fluctuations during the past several
years. In general, oil and natural gas prices were substantially lower during the comparable
periods of 2009 measured against 2008. The following table sets forth the average NYMEX oil and
natural gas prices for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, as well as the
high and low NYMEX price for the same periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Average NYMEX prices: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (Bbl) |
|
$ |
68.24 |
|
|
$ |
118.67 |
|
|
$ |
57.22 |
|
|
$ |
113.59 |
|
Natural gas (MMBtu) |
|
$ |
3.42 |
|
|
$ |
9.02 |
|
|
$ |
3.90 |
|
|
$ |
9.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High / Low NYMEX prices: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (Bbl): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
$ |
74.37 |
|
|
$ |
145.29 |
|
|
$ |
74.37 |
|
|
$ |
145.29 |
|
Low |
|
$ |
59.52 |
|
|
$ |
91.15 |
|
|
$ |
33.98 |
|
|
$ |
86.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (MMBtu): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
$ |
4.88 |
|
|
$ |
13.58 |
|
|
$ |
6.07 |
|
|
$ |
13.58 |
|
Low |
|
$ |
2.51 |
|
|
$ |
7.22 |
|
|
$ |
2.51 |
|
|
$ |
7.22 |
|
Further demonstrating the continuing volatility, the NYMEX oil price and NYMEX natural gas
price reached highs and lows of $81.37 and $69.57 per Bbl and $5.16 and $4.29 per MMBtu,
respectively, during the period from October 1, 2009 to November 2, 2009. At November 2, 2009, the
NYMEX oil price and NYMEX natural gas price were $78.13 per Bbl and $4.82 per MMBtu, respectively.
2010 capital budget
On November 5, 2009, our board of directors approved a capital budget for 2010 of
approximately $506 million. The capital budget is predicated on us funding it substantially within
our cash flow. If commodity prices decline, below those at the time of the capital budget
approval, and considering other factors that may change, we expect we would adjust our spending
such that we spend substantially within our cash flow. The following is a summary of our 2010
capital budget:
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
2010 Budget |
|
|
Drilling and recompletion opportunities in our core operating area |
|
$ |
383 |
|
Projects operated by third parties |
|
|
8 |
|
Emerging plays, acquisition of leasehold acreage and other
property interests, and geological and geophysical |
|
|
82 |
|
Maintenance capital in our core operating areas |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total 2010 capital budget |
|
$ |
506 |
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Notes Issuance
On September 18, 2009, we issued $300 million in principal amount of 8.625% senior notes due
2017 at 98.578% of par. The 8.625% senior notes will mature on October 1, 2017 and interest is
paid in arrears semi-annually on April 1 and October 1 beginning April 1, 2010. We used the net
proceeds of $288.2 million (net of related estimated offering costs) to repay a portion of the
borrowings under our credit facility. The senior notes are senior unsecured obligations of ours
and rank equally in right of payment with all of our other existing and future senior unsecured
indebtedness.
We issued the senior notes to (i) extend the maturities of our debt to better match the
long-lived nature of our assets, (ii) increase liquidity under our credit facility and (iii) reduce
our dependency on bank debt.
43
Borrowing base
Pursuant to the terms of our credit facility, our borrowing base was to be reduced by $0.30
for every dollar of new indebtedness evidenced by unsecured senior notes or unsecured senior
subordinated notes that we issue. As a result of this provision, the borrowing base under our
credit facility would have been reduced by $90 million due to our issuance and sale of the senior
notes. However, we received waivers of this provision from lenders representing approximately 95.4%
of our borrowing base, resulting in an actual reduction of approximately $4.1 million in our
borrowing base, which reduced our borrowing base to $955.9 million.
On October 23, 2009, our borrowing base of $955.9 million was reaffirmed by our lenders under
our credit facility. At September 30, 2009, we have $605.9 million of availability under our
credit facility based on the reaffirmed borrowing base.
2009 capital budget
On November 6, 2008, our board of directors approved the following capital budget for 2009,
predicated on us funding it substantially within our cash flow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current 2009 |
|
|
|
Original 2009 |
|
|
Planned Capital |
|
(in millions) |
|
Budget |
|
|
Expenditures |
|
|
Drilling and recompletion opportunities in our core operating area |
|
$ |
398 |
|
|
$ |
316 |
|
Projects operated by third parties |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Emerging plays, acquisition of leasehold acreage and other
property interests, and geological and geophysical |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Maintenance capital in our core operating areas |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total 2009 capital budget |
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
$ |
400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In January 2009, in light of the significant drop in commodity prices during the fourth
quarter of 2008, we took actions to reduce our activities to a level that would allow us to fund
our capital expenditures substantially within our cash flow, which at the time resulted in
estimated annual capital expenditures of approximately $300 million for 2009. As a result of
improved commodity prices, in particular oil prices, we recently increased our estimated capital
expenditures for 2009 to approximately $400 million, which we believe we can substantially fund
within our cash flow. We will continue to monitor our capital expenditures, at least on a quarterly
basis, in relation to our cash flow and expect to adjust our activity and capital spending level
based on changes in commodity prices and the cost of goods and services and other considerations.
For clarity purposes we view our cash flow as our cash flow from operations before changes in
working capital, and we include the cash payments/receipts on our derivatives that are included in
our investing activities.
During the first nine months of 2009, we incurred approximately $305.5 million of capital
expenditures (excluding the effects of asset retirement obligations and adjustments to the
acquisition of the Henry Properties). These costs were in line with our cash flows (as described in
the previous paragraph) during the period. For the balance of 2009, we expect to use the remaining
approximately $94.5 million of our planned capital expenditures to pursue increased opportunities
in our core operating areas along with targeted opportunities in our emerging plays.
Henry Entities acquisition
On July 31, 2008, we closed the acquisition of Henry Petroleum LP and certain entities
affiliated with Henry Petroleum LP (the Henry Entities) and additional non-operated interests in
oil and natural gas properties from persons affiliated with the Henry Entities. In August 2008 and
September 2008, we acquired additional non-operated interests in oil and natural gas properties
from persons affiliated with the Henry Entities. The assets acquired in the Henry Entities
acquisition, including the additional non-operated interests, are referred to as the Henry
Properties. We paid $583.7 million in cash for the Henry Properties acquisition, which was funded
with borrowings under our credit facility, which was amended and restated on July 31, 2008, and net
proceeds of approximately $242.4 million from our private placement of 8,302,894 shares of our
common stock.
Derivative financial instrument exposure
At September 30, 2009, the fair value of our financial derivatives was a net asset of
$0.4 million. All of our counterparties to these financial derivatives are parties to our credit
facility and have their outstanding debt commitments and derivative exposures collateralized
pursuant to our credit facility. Pursuant to the terms of our financial derivative instruments and
their collateralization under our credit facility, we do not have exposure to potential margin
calls on our financial derivative instruments.
44
We currently have no reason to believe that our counterparties to these commodity derivative
contracts are not financially viable. Our credit facility does not allow us to offset amounts we
may owe a lender under our credit facility against amounts we may be owed related to our derivative
financial instruments with such party.
New commodity derivative contracts. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we
entered into additional commodity derivative contracts to economically hedge a portion of our
estimated future production. The following table summarizes information about these additional
commodity derivative contracts. When aggregating multiple contracts, the weighted average contract price is disclosed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
Index |
|
Contract |
|
|
Volume |
|
Price |
|
Period |
|
Oil (volumes in Bbls): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price collar |
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
$ |
45.00 - $49.00 |
(a) |
|
3/1/09 - 5/31/09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price swap |
|
|
960,000 |
|
|
$ |
59.44 |
(a) |
|
7/1/09 - 12/31/09 |
Price swap |
|
|
273,000 |
|
|
$ |
67.50 |
(a) |
|
8/1/09 - 12/31/09 |
Price swap |
|
|
3,307,000 |
|
|
$ |
63.44 |
(a) |
|
1/1/10 - 12/31/10 |
Price swap |
|
|
2,601,000 |
|
|
$ |
71.66 |
(a) |
|
1/1/11 - 12/31/11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (volumes in MMBtus): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price collar |
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
5.00 - $5.81 |
(b) |
|
10/1/09 - 12/31/09 |
Price collar |
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
5.00 - $5.81 |
(b) |
|
1/1/10 - 3/31/10 |
Price collar |
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
5.25 - $5.75 |
(b) |
|
4/1/10 - 9/30/10 |
Price collar |
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
6.00 - $6.80 |
(b) |
|
10/1/10 - 12/31/10 |
Price collar |
|
|
1,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
6.00 - $6.80 |
(b) |
|
1/1/11 - 3/31/11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price swap |
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
4.31 |
(b) |
|
4/1/09 - 9/30/09 |
Price swap |
|
|
1,050,000 |
|
|
$ |
4.66 |
(b) |
|
7/1/09 - 12/31/09 |
Price swap |
|
|
6,810,000 |
|
|
$ |
6.13 |
(b) |
|
1/1/10 - 12/31/10 |
Price swap |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
$ |
7.29 |
(b) |
|
1/1/11 - 3/31/11 |
Price swap |
|
|
5,400,000 |
|
|
$ |
6.96 |
(b) |
|
4/1/11 - 12/31/11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis swap |
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
(c) |
|
7/1/09 - 9/30/09 |
Basis swap |
|
|
450,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.89 |
(c) |
|
10/1/09 - 12/31/09 |
Basis swap |
|
|
8,400,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
(c) |
|
1/1/10 - 12/31/10 |
Basis swap |
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
(c) |
|
1/1/11 - 3/31/11 |
Basis swap |
|
|
5,400,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
(c) |
|
4/1/11 - 12/31/11 |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The index prices for the oil price swaps and collars are based on the NYMEX-West Texas Intermediate monthly average futures price. |
|
(b) |
|
The index prices for the natural gas price swaps and collars are based on the NYMEX-Henry Hub last trading day futures price. |
|
(c) |
|
The basis differential between the El Paso Permian delivery point and NYMEX Henry Hub delivery point. |
45
In October 2009, we entered into the following oil and natural gas price swaps to hedge
an additional portion of our estimated future production:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
Index |
|
Contract |
|
|
Volume |
|
Price |
|
Period |
|
Oil (volumes in Bbls): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price swap |
|
|
540,000 |
|
|
$ |
80.33 |
(a) |
|
1/1/10 - 12/31/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (volumes in MMBtus): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price swap |
|
|
1,504,000 |
|
|
$ |
6.11 |
(b) |
|
1/1/10 - 12/31/10 |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The index price for the oil price swap is based on the NYMEX-West Texas Intermediate monthly average futures price. |
|
(b) |
|
The index prices for the natural gas price swaps and collars are based on the NYMEX-Henry Hub last trading day futures price. |
46
Results of Operations
The following table presents selected volume and price information for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Net production volumes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (MBbl) |
|
|
1,912 |
|
|
|
1,247 |
|
|
|
5,430 |
|
|
|
3,033 |
|
Natural gas (MMcf) |
|
|
5,753 |
|
|
|
3,944 |
|
|
|
16,122 |
|
|
|
10,395 |
|
Total (MBoe) |
|
|
2,871 |
|
|
|
1,904 |
|
|
|
8,117 |
|
|
|
4,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average daily production volumes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (Bbl) |
|
|
20,783 |
|
|
|
13,554 |
|
|
|
19,890 |
|
|
|
11,069 |
|
Natural gas (Mcf) |
|
|
62,533 |
|
|
|
42,870 |
|
|
|
59,055 |
|
|
|
37,938 |
|
Total (Boe) |
|
|
31,205 |
|
|
|
20,699 |
|
|
|
29,733 |
|
|
|
17,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average prices: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil, without hedges (Bbl) |
|
$ |
63.44 |
|
|
$ |
114.44 |
|
|
$ |
53.00 |
|
|
$ |
110.29 |
|
Oil, with hedges(a) (Bbl) |
|
$ |
63.44 |
|
|
$ |
104.73 |
|
|
$ |
53.00 |
|
|
$ |
99.51 |
|
Natural gas, without hedges (Mcf) |
|
$ |
5.60 |
|
|
$ |
10.12 |
|
|
$ |
4.90 |
|
|
$ |
10.87 |
|
Natural gas, with hedges(a) (Mcf) |
|
$ |
5.60 |
|
|
$ |
10.11 |
|
|
$ |
4.90 |
|
|
$ |
10.84 |
|
Total, without hedges (Boe) |
|
$ |
53.46 |
|
|
$ |
95.91 |
|
|
$ |
45.19 |
|
|
$ |
93.89 |
|
Total, with hedges(a) (Boe) |
|
$ |
53.46 |
|
|
$ |
89.53 |
|
|
$ |
45.19 |
|
|
$ |
86.98 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
These prices do not reflect the cash receipts/payments related to the oil and natural
gas derivatives that were not designated as hedges and are reflected in (gain) loss on
derivatives not designated as hedges in our statements of operations. If the cash
receipts/payments related to the oil and natural gas derivatives that were not designated
as hedges were included in our oil and natural gas sales our oil and natural gas prices
would be as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Oil (Bbl) |
|
$ |
70.75 |
|
|
$ |
95.24 |
|
|
$ |
65.96 |
|
|
$ |
90.35 |
|
Natural gas (Mcf) |
|
$ |
6.19 |
|
|
$ |
9.87 |
|
|
$ |
5.48 |
|
|
$ |
10.71 |
|
Total (Boe) |
|
$ |
59.51 |
|
|
$ |
82.81 |
|
|
$ |
55.00 |
|
|
$ |
80.86 |
|
The presentation above provides the full effect of our oil and natural gas derivatives
program without consideration for the financial presentation of the cash receipts/payments
from the oil and natural gas derivatives.
47
Three months ended September 30, 2009, compared to three months ended September 30, 2008
Oil and natural gas revenues. Revenue from oil and natural gas operations was $153.5
million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of $17.0 million (10 percent)
from $170.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. This decrease was primarily due
to substantial decreases in realized oil and natural gas prices, offset by increased production (i)
as a result of the acquisition of the Henry Properties on July 31, 2008 and (ii) due to successful
drilling efforts during 2008 and 2009. Specifically, the:
average realized oil price (after giving effect to hedging activities) was $63.44 per
Bbl during the three months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of 39 percent from
$104.73 per Bbl during the three months ended September 30, 2008;
total oil production was 1,912 MBbl for the three months ended September 30, 2009, an
increase of 665 MBbl (53 percent) from 1,247 MBbl for the three months ended September
30, 2008;
average realized natural gas price (after giving effect to hedging activities) was
$5.60 per Mcf during the three months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of 45 percent
from $10.11 per Mcf during the three months ended September 30, 2008; and
total natural gas production was 5,753 MMcf for the three months ended September 30,
2009, an increase of 1,809 MMcf (46 percent) from 3,944 MMcf for the three months ended
September 30, 2008.
Hedging activities. The oil and natural gas prices that we report are based on the market
price received for the commodities adjusted to give effect to the results of our cash flow hedging
activities. We utilize commodity derivative instruments in order to (i) reduce the effect of the
volatility of price changes on the commodities we produce and sell, (ii) support our capital budget
and expenditure plans and (iii) support the economics associated with acquisitions.
Currently, we do not designate our derivative instruments to qualify for hedge accounting.
Accordingly, we reflect the changes in the fair value of our derivative instruments in the
statements of operations as (gain) loss on derivatives not designated as hedges. All of our
remaining hedges that historically qualified or were dedesignated from hedge accounting were
settled in 2008.
The following is a summary of the effects of commodity hedges that qualify for hedge
accounting treatment for the three months ended September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil Hedges |
|
Natural Gas Hedges |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
(dollars in thousands) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
Hedging revenue decrease |
|
$ |
(12,111 |
) |
|
$ |
(38 |
) |
Hedged volumes (Bbls and MMBtus, respectively) |
|
|
239,000 |
|
|
|
1,242,000 |
|
48
Production expenses. The following tables provide the components of our total oil and natural
gas production costs for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per |
|
(in thousands, except per unit amounts) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Boe |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Boe |
|
|
Lease operating expenses |
|
$ |
13,573 |
|
|
$ |
4.73 |
|
|
$ |
12,338 |
|
|
$ |
6.48 |
|
Taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ad valorem |
|
|
954 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
792 |
|
|
|
0.42 |
|
Production |
|
|
10,682 |
|
|
|
3.72 |
|
|
|
13,734 |
|
|
|
7.21 |
|
Workover costs |
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total oil and gas production expenses |
|
$ |
25,439 |
|
|
$ |
8.86 |
|
|
$ |
27,041 |
|
|
$ |
14.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Among the cost components of production expenses, in general, we have some control over lease
operating expenses and workover costs on properties we operate, but production and ad valorem taxes
are directly related to commodity price changes.
The lease operating expenses during the third quarter of 2009 include the benefit of
approximately $2.3 million ($.79 per Boe) related to overestimate of costs in the prior periods.
Lease operating expenses were $13.6 million ($4.73 per Boe) for the three months ended
September 30, 2009, an increase of $1.3 million (11 percent) from $12.3 million ($6.48 per Boe) for
the three months ended September 30, 2008. The total increase in absolute amounts, taking into
consideration details in the preceding paragraph, in lease operating expenses is due to (i) the
wells acquired in the Henry Properties acquisition and (ii) our wells successfully drilled and
completed in 2008 and 2009. The decrease in lease operating expenses on a per unit basis, taking
into consideration details in the preceding paragraph, is due to (i) increased volumes from our
successful drilling program in 2008 and 2009 that has allowed economies of scale in our cost
structure and (ii) cost reductions in the services and supplies primarily as a result of the
recently lower commodity prices, offset by the wells acquired in the Henry Properties acquisition,
which have a higher per unit cost as compared to our historical per unit cost.
Ad valorem taxes have increased primarily as a result of the Henry Properties acquisition,
which were highly concentrated in Texas, a state which has a higher ad valorem tax rate than New
Mexico, where substantially all of our properties prior to the acquisition were located.
Production taxes per unit of production were $3.72 per Boe during the three months ended
September 30, 2009, a decrease of 48 percent from $7.21 per Boe during the three months ended
September 30, 2008. The decrease is directly related to the decrease in commodity prices offset by
the increase in oil and natural gas revenues related to increased production volumes. Over the same
period, our Boe prices (before the effects of hedging) decreased 44 percent.
Workover expenses were approximately $0.2 million for the three months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008. The 2008 and 2009 amounts related primarily to workovers in our Texas Permian area.
Exploration and abandonments expense. The following table provides a breakdown of our
exploration and abandonments expense for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Geological and geophysical |
|
$ |
2,120 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
Exploratory dry holes |
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
2,779 |
|
Leasehold abandonments and other |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
13,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total exploration and abandonments |
|
$ |
2,776 |
|
|
$ |
16,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
Our geological and geophysical expense during the three months ended September 30, 2009 is
primarily attributable to continued seismic activity in our Lower Abo emerging play. During the
three months ended September 30, 2008, our geological and geophysical expense was primarily
attributable to a comprehensive seismic survey on our New Mexico shelf properties which was
initiated in December 2007 and completed in 2008.
During
the three months ended September 30, 2009, we wrote-off
additional costs associated with a prior quarter unsuccessful
exploratory well in our Texas Permian area. Our exploratory dry hole expense during the
three months ended September 30, 2008 is primarily attributable to an unsuccessful operated
exploratory well located in our emerging plays area in Texas.
For the three months ended September 30, 2009, we recorded approximately $0.2 million of
leasehold abandonments, which relates primarily to the write-off of a prospect in our New Mexico
Permian area and a prospect in our Texas Permian area. For the three months ended September 30,
2008, we recorded $13.9 million of leasehold abandonments, which were primarily related to our
Western Delaware Basin acreage and a portion of our Fayetteville acreage in Arkansas.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense. The following table provides components of
our depreciation, depletion and amortization expense for the three months ended September 30, 2009
and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per |
|
(in thousands, except per unit amounts) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Boe |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Boe |
|
|
Depletion of proved oil and natural gas properties |
|
$ |
53,824 |
|
|
$ |
18.75 |
|
|
$ |
31,729 |
|
|
$ |
16.66 |
|
Depreciation of other property and equipment |
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
Amortization of intangible asset operating rights |
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
0.13 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depletion, depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
54,835 |
|
|
$ |
19.10 |
|
|
$ |
32,528 |
|
|
$ |
17.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil price used to estimate proved oil reserves at period end |
|
$ |
67.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
97.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas price used to estimate proved gas reserves at period end |
|
$ |
3.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depletion of proved oil and natural gas properties was $53.8 million ($18.75 per Boe) for the
three months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of $22.1 million from $31.7 million ($16.66 per
Boe) for the three months ended September 30, 2008. The increase in depletion expense, on a total
and a per Boe basis, was primarily due to (i) the Henry Properties acquisition, for which the
depletion rate was higher than that of our historical assets, (ii) capitalized costs associated
with new wells that were successfully drilled and completed in 2008 and 2009 and (iii) the decrease
in the oil and natural gas prices between the years utilized to determine proved reserves.
The amortization of the intangible asset is a result of the value assigned to the operating
rights that we acquired in the Henry Properties acquisition. The intangible asset is currently
being amortized over an estimated life of approximately 25 years.
Impairment of long-lived assets. We periodically review our long-lived assets to be held and
used, including proved oil and natural gas properties accounted for under the successful efforts
method of accounting. Due to downward adjustments to the economically recoverable resource
potential associated with declines in commodity prices and well performance, we recognized a
non-cash charge against earnings of $1.1 million during the three months ended September 30, 2009,
which was primarily attributable to a downward revision of proved reserves primarily related to a
property in our New Mexico Permian area. For the three months ended September 30, 2008, we
recognized a non-cash charge against earnings of $2.8 million, which was comprised primarily of a
property in our New Mexico Permian area.
50
General and administrative expenses. The following table provides components of our general
and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per |
|
(in thousands, except per unit amounts) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Boe |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Boe |
|
|
General and administrative expenses recurring |
|
$ |
10,986 |
|
|
$ |
3.83 |
|
|
$ |
8,611 |
|
|
$ |
4.52 |
|
Non-recurring bonus paid to former Henry Entities employees |
|
|
2,369 |
|
|
|
0.83 |
|
|
|
2,367 |
|
|
|
1.24 |
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation stock options |
|
|
1,315 |
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
1,209 |
|
|
|
0.63 |
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation restricted stock |
|
|
1,233 |
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
716 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
Less: Third-party operating fee reimbursements |
|
|
(3,188 |
) |
|
|
(1.11 |
) |
|
|
(2,125 |
) |
|
|
(1.12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total general and administrative expenses |
|
$ |
12,715 |
|
|
$ |
4.44 |
|
|
$ |
10,778 |
|
|
$ |
5.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses were $12.7 million ($4.44 per Boe) for the three months
ended September 30, 2009, an increase of $1.9 million (18 percent) from $10.8 million ($5.65 per
Boe) for the three months ended September 30, 2008. The increase in general and administrative
expenses during the three months ended September 30, 2009 over 2008 was primarily due to (i) an
increase in non-cash stock-based compensation and (ii) an increase in the number of employees and
related personnel expenses, partially offset by an increase in third-party operating fee
reimbursements.
In connection with the Henry Entities acquisition, we agreed to pay certain of our employees,
who were formerly Henry Entities employees, a predetermined bonus amount, in addition to the
compensation we pay these employees, over the two years following the
acquisition. Since these employees will earn this bonus over the two years, we are reflecting
the cost in our general and administrative costs as non-recurring, as it is not controlled by us.
See Note K of the Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1.
Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) for additional information related to this bonus.
We earn reimbursements as operator of certain oil and natural gas properties in which we own
interests. As such, we earned reimbursements of $3.2 million and $2.1 million during the three
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. This reimbursement is reflected as a
reduction of general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. The
increase in this reimbursement is primarily related to the Henry Properties acquisition, as we own
a lower working interest in these operated properties compared to our historical property base, so
we receive a larger third-party reimbursement as compared to our historical property base.
Bad debt expense. On May 20, 2008, we entered into a short-term purchase agreement with an
oil purchaser to buy a portion of our oil affected as a result of a New Mexico refinery shut down
due to repairs. On July 22, 2008, this purchaser declared bankruptcy. We fully reserved the
receivable amount due from this purchaser of approximately $1.1 million during the three months
ended September 30, 2008, and are pursuing our claim in the bankruptcy proceedings.
(Gain) loss on derivatives not designated as hedges. During the three months ended September
30, 2007, we determined that all of our natural gas commodity derivative contracts no longer
qualified as hedges. Because we no longer considered these hedges to be highly effective, we
discontinued hedge accounting for those existing hedges, prospectively, and during the period the
hedges became ineffective. In addition, for our commodity and interest rate derivative contracts
entered into after August 2007, we chose not to designate any of these contracts as hedges. As a
result, any changes in fair value and any cash settlements related to these contracts are recorded
in earnings during the related period. All amounts previously recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income were reclassified to earnings prior to 2009.
51
The following table sets forth the cash receipts for settlements and the non-cash
mark-to-market adjustment for the derivative contracts not designated as hedges for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Cash payments (receipts): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivatives oil |
|
$ |
(13,971 |
) |
|
$ |
11,837 |
|
Commodity derivatives natural gas |
|
|
(3,395 |
) |
|
|
946 |
|
Financial derivatives interest |
|
|
1,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mark-to-market (gain) loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivatives oil |
|
|
12,821 |
|
|
|
(160,148 |
) |
Commodity derivatives natural gas |
|
|
8,442 |
|
|
|
(15,947 |
) |
Financial derivatives interest |
|
|
2,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on derivatives not designated as hedges |
|
$ |
7,783 |
|
|
$ |
(163,312 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense. Interest expense was $6.8 million for the three months ended September 30,
2009, a decrease of $3.5 million from $10.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008.
The weighted average interest rate for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was 3.2
percent and 4.2 percent, respectively. The weighted average debt balance during the three months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was approximately $664.6 million and $541.4 million,
respectively.
The increase in weighted average debt balance during the three months ended September 30, 2009
was due primarily to borrowings in July 2008 for the acquisition of the Henry Properties. The
decrease in interest expense is due to a decrease in the weighted average interest rate offset by
an increase in the weighted average debt balance. The decrease in the weighted average interest
rate is primarily due to an improvement in market interest rates.
The three months ended September 30, 2009, includes twelve days of interest on the $300
million of 8.625% senior notes issued in September 2009. Currently, the interest rate associated
with the senior notes is higher than the credit facility, which will result in us having higher
absolute interest rates in the foreseeable future.
Income tax provisions. We recorded income tax expense of $21.8 million and $91.0 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The effective income tax rate for
the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
was 52.5 percent and 39.1 percent, respectively. At September 30, 2009, we estimate our annual
effective tax rate to be approximately 31.0 percent (which is discussed later in this document) and
at June 30, 2009 we estimated our annual effective tax rate to be 42.1 percent. The annual
effective tax rate is determined by estimating the annual permanent tax differences and the annual
pre-tax book income. Our estimates involve assumptions we believe to be reasonable at the time of
the estimation. The three months ended September 30, 2009 includes approximately $8.9 million of
tax expense associated with the effects of the change in the six months ended June 30, 2009 and
nine months ended September 30, 2009 estimated annual effective tax rates.
52
Nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to nine months ended September 30, 2008
Oil and natural gas revenues. Revenue from oil and natural gas operations was $366.8
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of $47.8 million (12 percent) from
$414.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. This decrease was primarily due to
substantial decreases in realized oil and natural gas prices, offset by increased production (i) as
a result of the acquisition of the Henry Properties on July 31, 2008 and (ii) due to successful
drilling efforts during 2008 and 2009. Specifically, the:
average realized oil price (after giving effect to hedging activities) was $53.00 per
Bbl during the nine months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of 47 percent from
$99.51 per Bbl during the nine months ended September 30, 2008;
total oil production was 5,430 MBbl for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, an
increase of 2,397 MBbl (79 percent) from 3,033 MBbl for the nine months ended September
30, 2008;
average realized natural gas price (after giving effect to hedging activities) was
$4.90 per Mcf during the nine months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease of 55 percent
from $10.84 per Mcf during the nine months ended September 30, 2008; and
total natural gas production was 16,122 MMcf for the nine months ended September 30,
2009, an increase of 5,727 MMcf (55 percent) from 10,395 MMcf for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008.
Hedging activities. The oil and natural gas prices that we report are based on the market
price received for the commodities adjusted to give effect to the results of our cash flow hedging
activities. We utilize commodity derivative instruments in order to (i) reduce the effect of the
volatility of price changes on the commodities we produce and sell, (ii) support our capital budget
and expenditure plans and (iii) support the economics associated with acquisitions.
Currently, we do not designate our derivative instruments to qualify for hedge accounting.
Accordingly, we reflect the changes in the fair value of our derivative instruments in the
statements of operations as (gain) loss on derivatives not designated as hedges. All of our
remaining hedges that historically qualified or were dedesignated from hedge accounting were
settled in 2008.
The following is a summary of the effects of commodity hedges that qualify for hedge
accounting treatment for the nine months ended September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil Hedges |
|
Natural Gas Hedges |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
(dollars in thousands) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
Hedging revenue decrease |
|
$ |
(32,684 |
) |
|
$ |
(260 |
) |
Hedged volumes (Bbls and MMBtus, respectively) |
|
|
712,000 |
|
|
|
3,699,000 |
|
53
Production expenses. The following tables provide the components of our total oil and natural
gas production costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per |
|
(in thousands, except per unit amounts) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Boe |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Boe |
|
|
Lease operating expenses |
|
$ |
45,867 |
|
|
$ |
5.65 |
|
|
$ |
28,576 |
|
|
$ |
6.00 |
|
Taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ad valorem |
|
|
3,445 |
|
|
|
0.42 |
|
|
|
1,798 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
Production |
|
|
26,047 |
|
|
|
3.21 |
|
|
|
34,842 |
|
|
|
7.31 |
|
Workover costs |
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
699 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total oil and gas production expenses |
|
$ |
76,022 |
|
|
$ |
9.36 |
|
|
$ |
65,915 |
|
|
$ |
13.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Among the cost components of production expenses, in general, we have some control over lease
operating expenses and workover costs on properties we operate, but production and ad valorem taxes
are directly related to commodity price changes.
Lease operating expenses were $45.9 million ($5.65 per Boe) for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, an increase of $17.3 million (60 percent) from $28.6 million ($6.00 per Boe)
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The total increase in absolute amounts in lease
operating expenses is due to (i) the wells acquired in the Henry Properties acquisition and (ii)
our wells successfully drilled and completed in 2008 and 2009. The decrease in lease operating
expenses on a per unit basis is due to (i) increased volumes from our successful drilling program
in 2008 and 2009 that has allowed economies of scale in our cost structure and (ii) cost reductions
in the services and supplies primarily as a result of the recently lower commodity prices, offset
by the wells acquired in the Henry Properties acquisition, which have a higher per unit cost as
compared to our historical per unit cost.
Ad valorem taxes have increased primarily as a result of the Henry Properties acquisition,
which were highly concentrated in Texas, a state which has a higher ad valorem tax rate than New
Mexico, where substantially all of our properties prior to the acquisition were located.
Production taxes per unit of production were $3.21 per Boe during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, a decrease of 56 percent from $7.31 per Boe during the nine months ended
September 30, 2008. The decrease is directly related to the decrease in commodity prices offset by
the increase in oil and natural gas revenues related to increased volumes. Over the same period,
our Boe prices (before the effects of hedging) decreased 52 percent.
Workover expenses were approximately $0.7 million for both the nine months ended September 30,
2009 and 2008. The 2009 and 2008 amounts related primarily to workovers in the Texas Permian area.
Exploration and abandonments expense. The following table provides a breakdown of our
exploration and abandonments expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Geological and geophysical |
|
$ |
3,245 |
|
|
$ |
2,428 |
|
Exploratory dry holes |
|
|
2,340 |
|
|
|
2,778 |
|
Leasehold abandonments and other |
|
|
4,610 |
|
|
|
15,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total exploration and abandonments |
|
$ |
10,195 |
|
|
$ |
20,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our geological and geophysical expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 is
primarily attributable to continued seismic activity in our Lower Abo emerging play. During the
nine months ended September 30, 2008, our geological
and geophysical
54
expense was primarily
attributable to a comprehensive seismic survey on our New Mexico shelf properties which was
initiated in December 2007 and completed in 2008.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we wrote-off an unsuccessful exploratory well
in our Arkansas emerging play and two unsuccessful exploratory wells in Texas Permian area. Our
exploratory dry hole expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was primarily
attributable to an unsuccessful operated exploratory well located in our Texas Permian area.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we recorded approximately $4.6 million of
leasehold abandonments, which relate primarily to the write-off of four prospects in our New Mexico
Permian area and three prospects in our Texas Permian area. For the nine months ended September
30, 2008, we recorded $15.1 million of leasehold abandonments, which were primarily related to two
prospects in our Texas and Arkansas emerging plays area.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense. The following table provides components of
our depreciation, depletion and amortization expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per |
|
(in thousands, except per unit amounts) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Boe |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Boe |
|
|
Depletion of proved oil and natural gas properties |
|
$ |
154,819 |
|
|
$ |
19.07 |
|
|
$ |
74,239 |
|
|
$ |
15.58 |
|
Depreciation of other property and equipment |
|
|
1,998 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
1,257 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
Amortization of intangible asset operating rights |
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depletion, depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
157,985 |
|
|
$ |
19.46 |
|
|
$ |
75,822 |
|
|
$ |
15.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil price used to estimate proved oil reserves at period end |
|
$ |
67.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
97.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas price used to estimate proved gas reserves at period end |
|
$ |
3.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
Depletion of proved oil and natural gas properties was $154.8 million ($19.07 per Boe) for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009, an increase of $80.6 million from $74.2 million ($15.58 per
Boe) for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The increase in depletion expense, on a total
and per Boe basis, was primarily due to (i) the Henry Properties acquisition, for which the
depletion rate was higher than that of our historical assets, (ii) capitalized costs associated
with new wells that were successfully drilled and completed in 2008 and 2009 and (iii) the decrease
in the oil and natural gas prices between the years utilized to determine proved reserves.
The amortization of the intangible asset is a result of the value assigned to the operating
rights that we acquired in the Henry Properties acquisition. The intangible asset is currently
being amortized over an estimated life of approximately 25 years.
Impairment of long-lived assets. We periodically review our long-lived assets to be held and
used, including proved oil and natural gas properties accounted for under the successful efforts
method of accounting. Due to downward adjustments to the economically recoverable proved reserves
associated with declines in commodity prices and well performance, we recognized a non-cash charge
against earnings of $9.7 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2009, which was
primarily attributable to natural gas related properties in our New Mexico Permian area. For the
nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recognized a non-cash charge against earnings of $2.8
million, which was comprised primarily of a property in our New Mexico Permian area.
55
General and administrative expenses. The following table provides components of our general
and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per |
|
(in thousands, except per unit amounts) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Boe |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Boe |
|
|
General and administrative expenses recurring |
|
$ |
32,925 |
|
|
$ |
4.06 |
|
|
$ |
22,352 |
|
|
$ |
4.69 |
|
Non-recurring bonus paid to former Henry Entities employees |
|
|
7,680 |
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
|
|
2,367 |
|
|
|
0.50 |
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation stock options |
|
|
3,228 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
3,376 |
|
|
|
0.71 |
|
Non-cash stock-based compensation restricted stock |
|
|
3,433 |
|
|
|
0.42 |
|
|
|
1,578 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
Less: Third-party operating fee reimbursements |
|
|
(8,633 |
) |
|
|
(1.06 |
) |
|
|
(2,629 |
) |
|
|
(0.54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total general and administrative expenses |
|
$ |
38,633 |
|
|
$ |
4.77 |
|
|
$ |
27,044 |
|
|
$ |
5.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses were $38.6 million ($4.77 per Boe) for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, an increase of $11.6 million (43 percent) from $27.0 million ($5.69 per
Boe) for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The increase in general and administrative
expenses during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 over 2008 was primarily due to (i) the
non-recurring bonus paid to former Henry Entities employees, (ii) an increase in non-cash
stock-based compensation and (iii) an increase in the number of employees and related personnel
expenses, partially offset by an increase in third-party operating fee reimbursements.
In connection with the Henry Entities acquisition, we agreed to pay certain of our employees,
who were formerly Henry Entities employees, a predetermined bonus amount, in addition to the
compensation we pay these employees, over the two years following the acquisition. Since these
employees will earn this bonus over the two years, we are reflecting the cost in our general and
administrative costs as non-recurring, as it is not controlled by us. See Note K of the Condensed
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited) for additional information related to this bonus.
We earn reimbursements as operator of certain oil and natural gas properties in which we own
interests. As such, we earned reimbursements of $8.6 million and $2.6 million during the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. This
reimbursement is reflected as a reduction of general and administrative expenses in the
consolidated statements of operations. The increase in this reimbursement is primarily related to
the Henry Properties acquisition, as we own a lower working interest in these operated properties
compared to our historical property base, so we receive a larger third-party reimbursement as
compared to our historical property base.
Bad debt expense. On May 20, 2008, we entered into a short-term purchase agreement with an
oil purchaser to buy a portion of our oil affected as a result of a New Mexico refinery shut down
due to repairs. On July 22, 2008, this purchaser declared bankruptcy. We fully reserved the
receivable amount due from this purchaser of approximately $2.9 million as of September 30, 2008,
and are pursuing our claim in the bankruptcy proceedings.
(Gain) loss on derivatives not designated as hedges. During the nine months ended September
30, 2007, we determined that all of our natural gas commodity derivative contracts no longer
qualified as hedges. Because we no longer considered these hedges to be highly effective, we
discontinued hedge accounting for those existing hedges, prospectively, and during the period the
hedges became ineffective. In addition, for our commodity and interest rate derivative contracts
entered into after August 2007, we chose not to designate any of these contracts as hedges. As a
result, any changes in fair value and any cash settlements related to these contracts are recorded
in earnings during the related period. All amounts previously recorded in accumulated other
comprehensive income were reclassified to earnings prior to 2009.
56
The following table sets forth the cash receipts for settlements and the non-cash
mark-to-market adjustment for the derivative contracts not designated as hedges for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
(in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Cash payments (receipts): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivatives oil |
|
$ |
(70,383 |
) |
|
$ |
27,802 |
|
Commodity derivatives natural gas |
|
|
(9,227 |
) |
|
|
1,368 |
|
Financial derivatives interest |
|
|
2,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark-to-market (gain) loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity derivatives oil |
|
|
156,920 |
|
|
|
(71,248 |
) |
Commodity derivatives natural gas |
|
|
13,460 |
|
|
|
(1,600 |
) |
Financial derivatives interest |
|
|
1,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on derivatives not designated as hedges |
|
$ |
94,435 |
|
|
$ |
(43,678 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense. Interest expense was $17.4 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009, a decrease of $2.4 million from $19.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
The weighted average interest rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was 2.7
percent and 5.1 percent, respectively. The weighted average debt balance during the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was approximately $666.9 million and $389.9 million,
respectively.
The increase in weighted average debt balance during the nine months ended September 30, 2009
was due primarily to borrowings in July 2008 for the acquisition of the Henry Properties. The
decrease in interest expense is due to a decrease in the weighted average interest rate offset by
an increase in the weighted average debt balance. The decrease in the weighted average interest
rate is primarily due to an improvement in market interest rates.
The three months ended September 30, 2009, includes twelve days of interest on the $300
million of 8.625% senior notes issued in September 2009. Currently, the interest rate associated
with the senior notes is higher than the credit facility, which will result in us having higher
absolute interest rates in the foreseeable future.
Income tax provisions. We recorded an income tax benefit of $12.0 million and income tax
expense of $96.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The
effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was 31.0 percent
and 39.1 percent, respectively. The lower annual effective tax rate in 2009 compared to 2008 is
primarily due to the estimated annual 2009 permanent tax differences compared to the related
current estimated annual pre-tax book income. The estimated annual effective tax rate for 2009 at
June 30, 2009 was 42.1 percent based on the then estimated 2009 annual permanent tax differences
and pre-tax book income. If the actual 2009 pre-tax book income is larger than the current
estimate of 2009 pre-tax book income we would expect the annual effective tax rate to be higher
than the current estimate of 31.0 percent.
Capital Commitments, Capital Resources and Liquidity
Capital commitments. Our primary needs for cash are development, exploration and
acquisition of oil and natural gas assets, payment of contractual obligations and working capital
obligations. Funding for these cash needs may be provided by any combination of
internally-generated cash flow, financing under our credit facility, proceeds from the disposition
of assets or alternative financing sources, as discussed in Capital resources below.
Oil and natural gas properties. Our cost incurred on oil and natural gas properties, excluding
acquisitions and asset retirement obligations, during the three months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008 totaled $91.0 million and $108.2 million, respectively, and $293.7 million and $229.5 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. These expenditures were
primarily funded by cash flow from operations (including effects of derivative cash
receipts/payments).
On November 6, 2008, our board of directors approved a capital budget for 2009 of up to
approximately $500 million. The capital budget is predicated on funding it substantially within
cash flow. In January 2009, in light of the drop in commodity prices, we took actions to reduce our
capital activities to a level that would allow us to fund our capital expenditures substantially
within our cash flow, which at the time resulted in estimated annual capital expenditures of
approximately $300 million. Currently, based on current
57
capital costs and commodity prices we
estimate our capital expenditures to be approximately $400 million for 2009, which we believe we
can substantially fund within our cash flow. We will continue to monitor our capital expenditures,
at least on a quarterly basis, in relation to our cash flow and expect to adjust our activity and
capital spending level based on changes in commodity prices and the cost of goods and services and
other considerations. For clarity purposes we view our cash flow as our cash flow from operations
before changes in working capital and we include the cash payments/receipts on our derivatives that
are included in our investing activities.
On November 5, 2009, our board of directors approved a capital budget for 2010 of
approximately $506 million. The capital budget is predicated on us funding it substantially within
our cash flow. If commodity prices decline, below those at the time of the capital budget
approval, and considering other factors that may change, we expect we would adjust our spending
such that we spend substantially within our cash flow.
Other than the purchase of leasehold acreage and other miscellaneous property interests, our
2009 and 2010 capital budgets are exclusive of acquisitions. We do not have a specific acquisition
budget since the timing and size of acquisitions are difficult to forecast. We evaluate
opportunities to purchase or sell oil and natural gas properties in the marketplace and could
participate as a buyer or seller of properties at various times. We seek to acquire oil and natural
gas properties that provide opportunities for the addition of reserves and production through a
combination of exploitation, development, high-potential exploration and control of operations and
that will allow us to apply our operating expertise.
Although we cannot provide any assurance, we believe that our available cash and cash flows
will be sufficient to fund our remaining 2009 and 2010 capital expenditures, as adjusted from time
to time; however, we may also use our credit facility or other alternative financing sources to
fund such expenditures. The actual amount and timing of our expenditures may differ materially from
our estimates as a result of, among other things, actual drilling results, the timing of
expenditures by third parties on projects that we do not operate, the availability of drilling rigs
and other services and equipment, regulatory, technological and competitive developments and market
conditions. In addition, under certain circumstances we would consider increasing or reallocating
our 2009 and 2010 capital budgets.
Acquisitions. Our expenditures for acquisitions of proved and unproved properties during the
three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 totaled $7.2 million and $813.9 million,
respectively, and $10.7 million and $815.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, respectively. The Henry Properties acquisition in July 2008 was primarily funded by a private
placement of our common stock and borrowings under our credit facility.
Contractual obligations. Our contractual obligations include long-term debt, operating lease
obligations, drilling commitments (including commitments to pay day rates for drilling rigs),
employment agreements, contractual bonus payments, derivative obligations and other liabilities.
We had the following contractual obligations at September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
1 - 3 |
|
|
3 - 5 |
|
|
More than |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
1 year |
|
|
years |
|
|
years |
|
|
5 years |
|
|
Long-term debt (a) |
|
$ |
650,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
350,000 |
|
|
$ |
300,000 |
|
Operating lease obligations (b) |
|
|
7,850 |
|
|
|
1,073 |
|
|
|
2,163 |
|
|
|
4,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling commitments (c) |
|
|
2,805 |
|
|
|
2,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment agreements with executive officers (d) |
|
|
4,421 |
|
|
|
1,965 |
|
|
|
2,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Henry Entities bonus obligation (e) |
|
|
8,233 |
|
|
|
8,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities (f) |
|
|
39,717 |
|
|
|
23,158 |
|
|
|
16,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations (g) |
|
|
14,134 |
|
|
|
1,473 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
11,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations |
|
$ |
727,160 |
|
|
$ |
38,707 |
|
|
$ |
21,538 |
|
|
$ |
355,057 |
|
|
$ |
311,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
See Note J of the Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) for information regarding future
interest payment obligations on the 8.625% unsecured senior notes. The amounts included in
the table above represent principal maturities only. |
58
|
|
|
(b) |
|
See Note K of the Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited). |
|
(c) |
|
Consists of daywork drilling contracts related to drilling rigs contracted through June
30, 2010. See Note K of the Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included
in Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited). |
|
(d) |
|
Represents amounts of cash compensation we are obligated to pay to our executive
officers under employment agreements assuming such employees continue to serve the entire
term of their employment agreement and their cash compensation is not adjusted. |
|
(e) |
|
Represents bonuses we agreed to pay certain employees of the Henry Entities at each of
the first and second anniversaries of the closing of the Henry Properties acquisition. The
first such anniversary bonus payment was made on July 31, 2009. See Note K of the
Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1. Consolidated
Financial Statements (Unaudited). |
|
(f) |
|
Derivative obligations represent only the liability positions for our commodity and
interest rate derivatives that were valued at September 30, 2009. The ultimate settlement
amounts of our derivative obligations are unknown because they are subject to continuing
market risk. See Note I of the Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
included in Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) regarding our
derivative obligations. |
|
(g) |
|
Amounts represent costs related to expected oil and gas property abandonments related
to proved reserves by period, net of any future accretion. See Note E of the Condensed
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1. Consolidated Financial
Statements (Unaudited). |
Off-balance sheet arrangements. Currently, we do not have any material off-balance sheet
arrangements.
Capital resources. Our primary sources of liquidity have been cash flows generated from
operating activities (including the derivative cash receipts/payments presented in our investing
activities) and financing provided by our credit facility. We believe that funds from our cash
flows and our credit facility should be sufficient to meet both our short-term working capital
requirements and our 2009 and 2010 capital expenditure plans.
Cash flow from operating activities. Our net cash provided by operating activities was $232.1
million and $319.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The
decrease in operating cash flows during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 over 2008 was
principally due to (i) decreases in average realized oil and natural gas prices, offset by
increased production, (ii) increases in oil and natural gas production costs and general and
administrative expenses and (iii) uses of funds associated with working capital.
Cash flow used in investing activities. During the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2008, we invested $316.8 million and $800.6 million, respectively, for additions to, and
acquisitions of, oil and natural gas properties, inclusive of dry hole costs. Cash flows used in
investing activities were substantially lower during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 over
2008, due to (i) the Henry acquisition occurring in the third quarter of 2008 and (ii) the
receipts/payments associated with derivatives not designated as hedges offset by an increase in our
exploration and development activities.
Cash flow from financing activities. Net cash provided by financing activities was $7.7
million and $540.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we borrowed funds under our credit facility and
issued approximately 8.3 million shares of our common stock to fund the Henry acquisition.
On September 18, 2009, we issued $300 million in principal amount of 8.625% senior notes due
2017 at 98.578% of par. The 8.625% senior notes will mature on October 1, 2017 and interest is
paid in arrears semi-annually on April 1 and October 1 beginning April 1, 2010. We used the net
proceeds of $288.2 million (net of related estimated offering costs) to repay a portion of the
borrowings under our credit facility. The senior notes are senior unsecured obligations of ours
and rank equally in right of payment with all of our other existing and future senior unsecured
indebtedness.
We issued the senior notes to (i) extend the maturities of our debt to better match the
long-lived nature of our assets, (ii) increase liquidity under our credit facility and (iii) reduce
our dependency on bank debt.
59
Pursuant to the terms of our credit facility (described below), our borrowing base was to be
reduced by $0.30 for every dollar of new indebtedness evidenced by unsecured senior notes or
unsecured senior subordinated notes that we issue. As a result of this provision, the borrowing
base under our credit facility would have been reduced by $90 million due to our issuance and sale
of the senior notes. However, we received waivers of this provision from lenders representing
approximately 95.4% of our borrowing base, resulting in an actual reduction of approximately
$4.1 million in our borrowing base, which reduced our borrowing base to $955.9 million.
Our credit facility, as amended, has a maturity date of July 31, 2013. At September 30, 2009,
we had letters of credit outstanding under the credit facility of approximately $25,000 and our
availability to borrow additional funds was approximately $605.9 million. In October 2009, the
lenders reaffirmed our $955.9 million borrowing base under the credit facility until the next
scheduled borrowing base redetermination in April 2010. Between scheduled borrowing base
redeterminations, we and, if requested by 66 2/3 percent of the lenders, the lenders, may each
request one special redetermination.
Advances on the credit facility bear interest, at our option, based on (i) the prime rate of
JPMorgan Chase Bank (JPM Prime Rate) (3.25 percent at September 30, 2009) or (ii) a Eurodollar
rate (substantially equal to the London Interbank Offered Rate). At September 30, 2009, the
interest rates of Eurodollar rate advances and JPM Prime Rate advances vary, with interest margins
ranging from 200 to 300 basis points and 112.5 to 212.5 basis points, respectively, per annum
depending on the debt balance outstanding. At September 30, 2009, we pay commitment fees on the
unused portion of the available borrowing base of 50 basis points per annum.
In conducting our business, we may utilize various financing sources, including the issuance
of (i) fixed and floating rate debt, (ii) convertible securities, (iii) preferred stock, (iv)
common stock and (v) other securities. We may also sell assets and issue securities in exchange
for oil and natural gas assets or interests in oil and natural gas companies. Additional
securities may be of a class senior to common stock with respect to such matters as dividends and
liquidation rights and may also have other rights and preferences as determined from time to time
by our board of directors. Utilization of some of these financing sources may require approval from
the lenders under our credit facility.
Financial markets. The current state of the financial markets remains uncertain, however, we
have recently seen improvements in the stock market and the credit markets appear to have
stabilized. There have been financial institutions that have (i) failed and been forced into
government receivership, (ii) received government bail-outs, (iii) declared bankruptcy, (iv) been
forced to seek additional capital and liquidity to maintain viability or (v) merged. The United
States and world economy has experienced and continues to experience volatility, which continues to
have an adverse impact on the financial markets.
At September 30, 2009, we had $605.9 million of available borrowing capacity under our credit
facility. Our credit facility is backed by a syndicate of 21 banks. Even in light of the current
volatility in the financial markets, we currently believe that the lenders under our credit
facility have the ability to fund additional borrowings we may need for our business.
We currently pay floating rate interest under our credit facility and we are unable to
predict, especially in light of the current uncertainty in the financial markets, whether we will
incur increased interest costs due to rising interest rates. We have used interest rate
derivatives to mitigate the cost of rising interest rates, and we may enter into additional
interest rate derivatives in the future. Additionally, we may issue additional fixed rate debt in
the future to increase available borrowing capacity under our credit facility or to reduce our
exposure to the volatility of interest rates.
In the current financial markets, we do not believe that we could refinance our credit
facility and obtain comparable terms. Since our credit facility matures in July 2013, we have no
immediate need to seek refinancing of our credit facility.
To the extent we need additional funds, beyond those available under our credit facility, to
operate our business or make acquisitions we would have to pursue other financing sources. These
sources could include issuance of (i) fixed and floating rate debt, (ii) convertible securities,
(iii) preferred stock, (iv) common stock or (v) other securities. We may also sell assets.
However, in light of the current financial market conditions there are no assurances that we could
obtain additional funding, or if available, at what cost and terms.
Liquidity. Our principal sources of short-term liquidity are cash on hand and available
borrowing capacity under our credit facility. At September 30, 2009, we had $15.7 million of cash
on hand.
At September 30, 2009, the borrowing base under our credit facility was $955.9 million (which
was reaffirmed in October 2009), which provided us with $605.9 million of available borrowing
capacity. Our borrowing base is redetermined semi-annually, with the next redetermination
occurring in April 2010. In addition to such semi-annual redeterminations, our lenders may request
one additional redetermination during any twelve-month period. In general, redeterminations are
based upon a number of factors,
60
including commodity prices and reserve levels. Upon a
redetermination, our borrowing base could be substantially reduced. In light of the current
commodity prices and the state of the financial markets, there is no assurance that our borrowing
base will not be reduced.
Book capitalization and current ratio. Our book capitalization at September 30, 2009 was
$1,958.4 million, consisting of debt of $645.7 million and stockholders equity of $1,312.7
million. Our debt to book capitalization was 33 percent and 32 percent at September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively. Our ratio of current assets to current liabilities was 0.74 to
1.00 at September 30, 2009 as compared to 1.03 to 1.00 at December 31, 2008.
Inflation and changes in prices. Our revenues, the value of our assets, and our ability to
obtain bank financing or additional capital on attractive terms have been and will continue to be
affected by changes in commodity prices and the costs to produce our reserves. Commodity prices are
subject to significant fluctuations that are beyond our ability to control or predict. During the
three months ended September 30, 2009, we received an average of $63.44 per barrel of oil and $5.60
per Mcf of natural gas before consideration of commodity derivative contracts compared to $114.44
per barrel of oil and $10.12 per Mcf of natural gas in the three months ended September 30, 2008.
Although certain of our costs are affected by general inflation, inflation does not normally have a
significant effect on our business. In a trend that began in 2004 and continued through the first
six months of 2008, commodity prices for oil and natural gas increased significantly. The higher
prices have led to increased activity in the industry and, consequently, rising costs. These cost
trends have put pressure not only on our operating costs but also on capital costs. We expect these
costs to continue to moderate during the remainder of 2009 as a result of the recent rapid
diminution in prices for oil and natural gas from 2008 peaks.
Critical Accounting Policies, Practices and Estimates
Our historical consolidated financial statements and related notes to consolidated
financial statements contain information that is pertinent to our managements discussion and
analysis of financial condition and results of operations. Preparation of financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires that our
management make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.
However, the accounting principles used by us generally do not change our reported cash flows or
liquidity. Interpretation of the existing rules must be done and judgments made on how the
specifics of a given rule apply to us.
In managements opinion, the more significant reporting areas impacted by managements
judgments and estimates are revenue recognition, the choice of accounting method for oil and
natural gas activities, oil and natural gas reserve estimation, asset retirement obligations,
impairment of long-lived assets and valuation of stock-based compensation. Managements judgments
and estimates in these areas are based on information available from both internal and external
sources, including engineers, geologists and historical experience in similar matters. Actual
results could differ from the estimates, as additional information becomes known.
There have been no material changes in our critical accounting policies and procedures during
the three months ended September 30, 2009. See our disclosure of critical accounting policies in
the consolidated financial statements on our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008, filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on
February 27, 2009.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Developments
Recent accounting pronouncements:
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASC 105-10 (formerly
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 168), Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification
(the Codification) has become the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the
FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in
accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). All existing accounting standard
documents are superseded by the Codification and any accounting literature not included in the
Codification will not be authoritative. However, rules and interpretive releases of the SEC issued
under the authority of federal securities laws will continue to be the source of authoritative
generally accepted accounting principles for SEC registrants. Effective September 30, 2009, there
will be no more references made to the superseded FASB standards in our consolidated financial
statements. The Codification does not change or alter existing GAAP and, therefore, will not have
an impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
ASU 2009-05. In August 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2009-05, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic
820)Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value (ASU 2009-05). The FASB issued this update because some
entities have expressed concern that there may be a lack of observable market information
61
to
measure the fair value of a liability. ASU 2009-05 is effective for the first reporting period
beginning after August 28, 2009, with earlier application permitted. The guidance provides
clarification on measuring liabilities at fair value when a quoted price in an active market is not
available. In such circumstances, ASU 2009-05 specifies that a valuation technique should be
applied that uses either the quote of the liability when traded as an asset, the quoted prices for
similar liabilities or similar liabilities when traded as assets, or another valuation technique
consistent with existing fair value measurement guidance. Examples of the alternative valuation
methods include using a present value technique or a market approach, which is based on the amount
at the measurement date that the reporting entity would pay to transfer the identical liability or
would receive to enter into the identical liability. The guidance also states that when estimating
the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a separate input or
adjustments to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer
of the liability. We adopted ASU 2009-05 effective September 30, 2009, and the adoption did not
have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
ASU 2009-11. In September 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-11, Extractive Activities Oil and
Gas: Amendment to Section 932-10-S99, which makes a technical correction in ASC 932-10-S99-5
related to an SEC Observer comment, regarding the accounting and disclosures for gas balancing
arrangements. The ASU amends FASB ASC 932-10-S99-5 because the SEC staff has not taken a position
on whether the entitlements method or sales method is preferable for gas-balancing arrangements as
defined in FASB ASC 932-815-55-1 and FASB ASC 932-815-55-2 that do not meet the definition of a
derivative.
With the entitlements method, sales revenue is recognized to the extent of each well
partners proportionate share of gas sold regardless of which partner sold the gas. Under the
sales method, sales revenue is recognized for all gas sold by a partner even if the partners
ownership is less than 100% of the gas sold.
ASU 2009-11 included an instruction in FASB ASC 932-10-S99-5 that public companies must
account for all significant gas imbalances consistently using one accounting method. Both the
method and any significant amount of imbalances in units and value should be disclosed in
regulatory filings. We currently account for all gas balances under the sales method and make all
required disclosures.
Recent developments in reserves reporting. In December 2008, the SEC released Final Rule,
Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting (the Reserve Ruling). The Reserve Ruling revises oil and
natural gas reporting disclosures. The Reserve Ruling permits the use of new technologies to
determine proved reserves estimates if those technologies have been demonstrated empirically to
lead to reliable conclusions about reserve volume estimates. The Reserve Ruling will also allow,
but not require, companies to disclose their probable and possible reserves to investors in
documents filed with the SEC. In addition, the new disclosure requirements require companies to:
(i) report the independence and qualifications of its reserves preparer or auditor; (ii) file
reports when a third party is relied upon to prepare reserves estimates or conduct a reserves
audit; and (iii) report oil and natural gas reserves using an average price based upon the prior
12-month period rather than a year-end price. The Reserve Ruling becomes effective for fiscal
years ending on or after December 31, 2009. We are currently assessing the impact that adoption of
the provisions of the Reserve Ruling will have on our financial position, results of operations and
disclosures.
62
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The following market risk disclosures should be read in conjunction with the quantitative
and qualitative disclosures about market risk contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008.
We are exposed to a variety of market risks including credit risk, commodity price risk and
interest rate risk. We address these risks through a program of risk management which includes the
use of derivative instruments. The following quantitative and qualitative information is provided
about financial instruments to which we are a party at September 30, 2009, and from which we may
incur future gains or losses from changes in market interest rates or commodity prices and losses
from extension of credit. We do not enter into derivative or other financial instruments for
speculative or trading purposes.
Hypothetical changes in interest rates and commodity prices chosen for the following estimated
sensitivity analysis are considered to be reasonably possible near-term changes generally based on
consideration of past fluctuations for each risk category. However, since it is not possible to
accurately predict future changes in interest rates and commodity prices, these hypothetical
changes may not necessarily be an indicator of probable future fluctuations.
Credit risk. We monitor our risk of loss due to non-performance by counterparties of their
contractual obligations. Our principal exposure to credit risk is through the sale of our oil and
natural gas production, which we market to energy marketing companies and refineries. We monitor
our exposure to these counterparties primarily by reviewing credit ratings, financial statements
and payment history. We extend credit terms based on our evaluation of each counterpartys
creditworthiness. Although we have not generally required our counterparties to provide collateral
to support their obligation to us, we may, if circumstances dictate, require collateral in the
future. In this manner, we reduce credit risk.
Commodity price risk. We are exposed to market risk as the prices of oil and natural gas are
subject to fluctuations resulting from changes in supply and demand. To reduce our exposure to
changes in the prices of oil and natural gas we have entered into, and may in the future enter into
additional commodity price risk management arrangements for a portion of our oil and natural gas
production. The agreements that we have entered into generally have the effect of providing us with
a fixed price for a portion of our expected future oil and natural gas production over a fixed
period of time. Our commodity price risk management activities could have the effect of reducing
net income and the value of our common stock. An average increase in the commodity price of $10.00
per barrel of oil and $1.00 per Mcf for natural gas from the commodity prices at September 30,
2009, would have decreased the net unrealized value on our commodity price risk management
contracts by approximately $91 million.
At September 30, 2009, we had (i) an oil price collar and oil price swaps that settle on a
monthly basis covering future oil production from July 1, 2009 through December 31, 2012 and (ii) a
natural gas price swap, natural gas price collars and natural gas basis swaps covering future
natural gas production from July 1, 2009 to December 31, 2011, see Note I of the Condensed Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited) for additional information on the commodity derivative contracts. The average NYMEX
oil futures price and average NYMEX natural gas futures prices for the three months ended September
30, 2009, was $68.24 per Bbl and $3.42 per MMBtu, respectively. At November 2, 2009, the NYMEX oil
futures price and NYMEX natural gas futures price was $78.13 per Bbl and $4.82 per MMBtu,
respectively. The decrease in oil and natural gas prices, should it continue during 2009, should
increase the fair value asset of our commodity derivative contracts from their recorded balance at
September 30, 2009. Changes in the recorded fair value of the undesignated commodity derivative
contracts are marked to market through earnings as unrealized gains or losses. The potential
increase in fair value asset would be recorded in earnings as unrealized gains. However, an
increase in the average NYMEX oil and natural gas futures price above those at September 30, 2009
would result in an decrease in fair value asset and unrealized losses in earnings. We are currently
unable to estimate the effects on the earnings of future periods resulting from changes in the
market value of our commodity derivative contracts.
Interest rate risk. Our exposure to changes in interest rates relates primarily to long-term
debt obligations. We manage our interest rate exposure by limiting our variable-rate debt to a
certain percentage of total capitalization and by monitoring the effects of market changes in
interest rates. To reduce our exposure to changes in interest rates we have entered into, and may
in the future enter into additional interest rate risk management arrangements for a portion of our
outstanding debt. The agreements that we have entered into generally have the effect of providing
us with a fixed interest rate for a portion of our variable rate debt. We may utilize interest rate
derivatives to alter interest rate exposure in an attempt to reduce interest rate expense related
to existing debt issues. Interest rate derivatives are used solely to modify interest rate exposure
and not to modify the overall leverage of the debt portfolio. We are exposed to changes in interest
rates as a result of our credit facility, and the terms of our credit facility require us to pay
higher interest rate margins as we utilize a larger percentage of our available borrowing base.
63
At September 30, 2009, we had interest rate swaps on $300 million of notional principal that
fixed the LIBOR interest rate (does not include the interest rate margins discussed above) at 1.90
percent for the three years beginning in May 2009. An average decrease
in future interest rates of 25 basis points from the future rate at September 30, 2009, would
have decreased our net unrealized value on our interest rate risk management contracts by
approximately $2.1 million.
We had total indebtedness of $350 million outstanding under our credit facility at September
30, 2009. The impact of a 1 percent increase in interest rates on this amount of debt would result
in increased annual interest expense of approximately $3.5 million.
The fair value of our derivative instruments is determined based on our valuation models. We
did not change our valuation method during 2009. During 2009, we were party to commodity
derivative instruments. See Note I of the Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
included in Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) for additional information
regarding our derivative instruments. The following table reconciles the changes that occurred in
the fair values of our derivative instruments during the nine months ended September 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Instruments Net Assets (Liabilities) (a) |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Commodities |
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Fair value of contracts outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
173,523 |
|
|
$ |
(1,083 |
) |
|
$ |
172,440 |
|
Changes in fair values (b) |
|
|
(90,770 |
) |
|
|
(3,665 |
) |
|
|
(94,435 |
) |
Contract maturities |
|
|
(79,610 |
) |
|
|
2,020 |
|
|
|
(77,590 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of contracts outstanding at September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
3,143 |
|
|
$ |
(2,728 |
) |
|
$ |
415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents the fair values of open derivative contracts subject to market risk. |
|
(b) |
|
At inception, new derivative contracts entered into by us have no intrinsic value. |
64
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. The Companys management, with the
participation of its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, have evaluated,
as required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act, the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this
report. Based on that evaluation, the Companys principal executive officer and principal financial
officer concluded that the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures
are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports
that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There have been no changes in the
Companys internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the
Exchange Act) that occurred during the Companys last fiscal quarter that have materially affected
or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Companys internal controls over financial
reporting.
65
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are party to the legal proceedings described under Legal actions in Note K of Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited). We are also party to other proceedings and claims incidental to our business. While
many of these other matters involve inherent uncertainty, we believe that the amount of the
liability, if any, ultimately incurred with respect to such proceedings and claims will not have a
material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position as a whole or on our liquidity,
capital resources or future results of operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and our Quarterly Reports on Form
10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total number |
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of shares |
|
number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
purchased as |
|
shares that |
|
|
Total number |
|
|
|
|
|
part of publicly |
|
may yet be |
|
|
of shares |
|
Average price |
|
announced |
|
purchased |
Period |
|
withheld (1) |
|
per share |
|
plans |
|
under the plan |
|
July 1, 2009 - July 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 1, 2009 - August 31, 2009 |
|
|
3,039 |
|
|
$ |
32.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 1, 2009 - September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents shares that were withheld by us to satisfy tax withholding obligations of certain executive officers that arose upon
the lapse of restrictions on restricted stock. |
66
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K on August 8, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Concho Resources Inc., as amended March 25, 2008 (filed as
Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K on March 26, 2008, and incorporated herein
by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
Indenture, dated September 18, 2009, between Concho Resources Inc., the subsidiary guarantors
named therein, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K on September 22, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated September 18, 2009, between Concho Resources Inc., the
subsidiary guarantors named therein, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (filed
as Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K on September 22, 2009, and incorporated
herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
Form of 8.625% Senior Notes due 2017 (included in Exhibit 4.2). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
Waiver agreement, effective as of September 18, 2009, among Concho Resources Inc. and the lenders
party thereto (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K on September 22,
2009, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
(a)
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
(a)
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
(b)
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
(b)
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
(b) |
|
Furnished herewith. |
67
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONCHO RESOURCES INC.
|
|
Date: November 5, 2009 |
By |
/s/ Timothy A. Leach
|
|
|
|
Timothy A. Leach |
|
|
|
Director, Chairman of the Board of Directors,
Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By |
/s/ Darin G. Holderness
|
|
|
|
Darin G. Holderness |
|
|
|
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
68
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K on August 8, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Concho Resources Inc., as amended March 25, 2008 (filed as
Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K on March 26, 2008, and incorporated herein
by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
Indenture, dated September 18, 2009, between Concho Resources Inc., the subsidiary guarantors
named therein, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K on September 22, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated September 18, 2009, between Concho Resources Inc., the
subsidiary guarantors named therein, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (filed
as Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K on September 22, 2009, and incorporated
herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
Form of 8.625% Senior Notes due 2017 (included in Exhibit 4.2). |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
Waiver agreement, effective as of September 18, 2009, among Concho Resources Inc. and the lenders
party thereto (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K on September 22,
2009, and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
(a)
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
(a)
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
(b)
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
(b)
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
(b) |
|
Furnished herewith. |