e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-6402-1
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Texas
|
|
74-1488375 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I. R. S. employer identification number) |
|
|
|
1929 Allen Parkway, Houston, Texas
|
|
77019 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
713-522-5141
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
None
(Former name, former address, or former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YES o NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). YES o NO þ
The number of shares outstanding of the registrants common stock as of May 5, 2009 was
250,944,884 (net of treasury shares).
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
INDEX
2
GLOSSARY
The following terms are common to the deathcare industry, are used throughout this report, and have
the following meanings:
Atneed Funeral and cemetery arrangements after a death has occurred.
Burial Vaults A reinforced container intended to house and protect the casket before it
is placed in the ground.
Cemetery Perpetual Care or Endowment Care Fund A trust fund established for the purpose
of maintaining cemetery grounds and property into perpetuity.
Cremation The reduction of human remains to bone fragments by intense heat.
General Agency (GA) Revenues Commissions we receive from third-party life insurance
companies for life insurance policies or annuities sold to preneed customers for the purpose of
funding preneed funeral arrangements. The commission rate paid is determined based on the product
type sold, the length of payment terms, and the age of the insured/annuitant.
Interment The burial or final placement of human remains in the ground.
Lawn Crypt An underground outer burial receptacle constructed of concrete and reinforced
steel, which is usually pre-installed in predetermined designated areas.
Marker A method of identifying a deceased person in a particular burial space, crypt, or
niche. Permanent burial markers are usually made of bronze, granite, or stone.
Maturity When the underlying contracted service is performed or merchandise is
delivered, typically at death. This is the point at which preneed contracts are converted to atneed
contracts (note delivery can occur prior to death).
Mausoleum An above ground structure that is designed to house caskets and cremation
urns.
Preneed Purchase of products and services prior to use.
Preneed Backlog Future revenues from unfulfilled preneed funeral and cemetery
contractual arrangements.
Production Sales of preneed funeral and preneed or atneed cemetery contracts.
As used herein, SCI, Company, we, our, and us refer to Service Corporation International
and companies owned directly or indirectly by Service Corporation International, unless the context
requires otherwise.
3
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
510,595 |
|
|
$ |
573,451 |
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
(410,475 |
) |
|
|
(435,854 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
100,120 |
|
|
|
137,597 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(21,786 |
) |
|
|
(25,075 |
) |
Gain (loss) on divestitures and impairment charges, net |
|
|
7,230 |
|
|
|
(12,046 |
) |
Other operating expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,106 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
85,564 |
|
|
|
99,370 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(31,670 |
) |
|
|
(34,069 |
) |
Gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
1,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
1,920 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
(1,546 |
) |
|
|
(748 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
54,661 |
|
|
|
66,473 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(20,281 |
) |
|
|
(24,969 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
34,380 |
|
|
|
41,504 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
34,380 |
|
|
|
41,519 |
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
34,530 |
|
|
$ |
41,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
.14 |
|
|
$ |
.16 |
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
.14 |
|
|
$ |
.16 |
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
.14 |
|
|
$ |
.16 |
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders |
|
$ |
.14 |
|
|
$ |
.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of shares |
|
|
250,134 |
|
|
|
261,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of shares |
|
|
250,309 |
|
|
|
265,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per share |
|
$ |
.04 |
|
|
$ |
.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements)
4
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
215,971 |
|
|
$ |
128,397 |
|
Receivables, net |
|
|
78,612 |
|
|
|
96,145 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
31,221 |
|
|
|
31,603 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
79,571 |
|
|
|
79,571 |
|
Current assets held for sale |
|
|
1,311 |
|
|
|
1,279 |
|
Other |
|
|
23,952 |
|
|
|
18,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
430,638 |
|
|
|
355,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed funeral receivables, net and trust investments |
|
|
1,193,598 |
|
|
|
1,191,692 |
|
Preneed cemetery receivables, net and trust investments |
|
|
1,087,777 |
|
|
|
1,062,952 |
|
Cemetery property, at cost |
|
|
1,459,891 |
|
|
|
1,458,981 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
1,565,797 |
|
|
|
1,567,875 |
|
Non-current assets held for sale |
|
|
96,123 |
|
|
|
97,512 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,172,645 |
|
|
|
1,178,969 |
|
Deferred charges and other assets |
|
|
439,257 |
|
|
|
452,634 |
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments |
|
|
697,535 |
|
|
|
744,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,143,261 |
|
|
$ |
8,110,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities & Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
308,983 |
|
|
$ |
294,859 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
55,897 |
|
|
|
27,104 |
|
Current liabilities held for sale |
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
1,158 |
|
|
|
4,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
366,587 |
|
|
|
326,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,788,670 |
|
|
|
1,821,404 |
|
Deferred preneed funeral revenues |
|
|
586,232 |
|
|
|
588,198 |
|
Deferred preneed cemetery revenues |
|
|
804,205 |
|
|
|
771,117 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
306,067 |
|
|
|
288,677 |
|
Non-current liabilities held for sale |
|
|
74,002 |
|
|
|
75,537 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
321,567 |
|
|
|
356,090 |
|
Deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust |
|
|
1,848,853 |
|
|
|
1,817,665 |
|
Care trusts corpus |
|
|
732,502 |
|
|
|
772,234 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $1 per share par value, 500,000,000 shares
authorized, 251,413,475, and 249,953,075 shares issued, respectively, 250,943,842 and 249,472,075 shares
outstanding, respectively |
|
|
250,944 |
|
|
|
249,472 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
1,727,214 |
|
|
|
1,733,814 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(692,226 |
) |
|
|
(726,756 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
28,896 |
|
|
|
36,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common stockholders equity |
|
|
1,314,828 |
|
|
|
1,293,179 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
(252 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,314,576 |
|
|
|
1,293,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,143,261 |
|
|
$ |
8,110,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements)
5
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
34,380 |
|
|
$ |
41,519 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
Gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(1,610 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
29,115 |
|
|
|
27,077 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
5,484 |
|
|
|
6,124 |
|
Amortization of cemetery property |
|
|
5,911 |
|
|
|
7,385 |
|
Amortization of loan costs |
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts |
|
|
3,091 |
|
|
|
1,948 |
|
Provision for deferred income taxes |
|
|
18,577 |
|
|
|
19,231 |
|
(Gain) loss on divestitures and impairment charges, net |
|
|
(7,230 |
) |
|
|
12,046 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
2,408 |
|
|
|
2,197 |
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,324 |
) |
Change in assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions and divestitures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in receivables |
|
|
12,269 |
|
|
|
581 |
|
Decrease (increase) in other assets |
|
|
5,083 |
|
|
|
(7,719 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in payables and other liabilities |
|
|
21,954 |
|
|
|
(80,877 |
) |
Effect of preneed funeral production and maturities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in preneed funeral receivables, net and trust investments |
|
|
4,558 |
|
|
|
10,760 |
|
(Decrease) increase in deferred preneed funeral revenue |
|
|
(2,349 |
) |
|
|
10,610 |
|
Decrease in deferred preneed funeral receipts held in trust |
|
|
(5,579 |
) |
|
|
(16,927 |
) |
Effect of cemetery production and deliveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in preneed cemetery receivables, net and trust investments |
|
|
9,596 |
|
|
|
16,110 |
|
Increase in deferred preneed cemetery revenue |
|
|
9,589 |
|
|
|
2,591 |
|
Decrease in deferred preneed cemetery receipts held in trust |
|
|
(4,792 |
) |
|
|
(5,980 |
) |
Other |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
141,354 |
|
|
|
46,344 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(23,494 |
) |
|
|
(29,240 |
) |
Proceeds from divestitures and sales of property and equipment, net |
|
|
7,713 |
|
|
|
7,987 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
(512 |
) |
|
|
(3,882 |
) |
Net withdrawals (deposits) of restricted funds and other |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
(21,483 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities from continuing operations |
|
|
(16,164 |
) |
|
|
(46,618 |
) |
Net cash provided by investing activities from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(16,164 |
) |
|
|
(45,760 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,000 |
|
Payments of debt |
|
|
(2,132 |
) |
|
|
(46,179 |
) |
Principal payments on capital leases |
|
|
(6,581 |
) |
|
|
(5,888 |
) |
Early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(7,476 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchase of Company common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,606 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
2,363 |
|
|
|
1,335 |
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,324 |
|
Payments of dividends |
|
|
(9,981 |
) |
|
|
(10,585 |
) |
Bank overdrafts and other |
|
|
(13,658 |
) |
|
|
(7,829 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(37,465 |
) |
|
|
(35,428 |
) |
Effect of foreign currency on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(151 |
) |
|
|
(1,275 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
87,574 |
|
|
|
(36,119 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
128,397 |
|
|
|
168,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
215,971 |
|
|
$ |
132,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements)
6
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Excess of |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Par Value |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Interests |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at December
31, 2008 |
|
|
249,472 |
|
|
|
$ |
249,472 |
|
|
$ |
1,733,814 |
|
|
$ |
(726,756 |
) |
|
$ |
36,649 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,293,179 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
34,380 |
|
Other comprehensive
loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,753 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,753 |
) |
Dividends declared on
common stock ($.04
per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,045 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,045 |
) |
Employee share-based
compensation earned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,408 |
|
Stock option exercises |
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
|
631 |
|
|
|
1,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,363 |
|
Restricted stock
awards, net of
forfeitures |
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
(830 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of shares from treasury |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31,
2009 |
|
|
250,944 |
|
|
|
$ |
250,944 |
|
|
$ |
1,727,214 |
|
|
$ |
(692,226 |
) |
|
$ |
28,896 |
|
|
$ |
(252 |
) |
|
$ |
1,314,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements)
7
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
1. Nature of Operations
We are a provider of deathcare products and services, with a network of funeral service
locations and cemeteries primarily operating in the United States and Canada. Our operations
consist of funeral service locations, cemeteries, funeral service/cemetery combination locations,
crematoria, and related businesses.
Funeral service locations provide all professional services relating to funerals and
cremations, including the use of funeral facilities and motor vehicles and preparation and
embalming services. Funeral-related merchandise, including caskets, casket personalization
products, burial vaults, cremation receptacles, cremation memorial products, flowers, and other
ancillary products and services, is sold at funeral service locations. Cemeteries provide cemetery
property interment rights, including mausoleum spaces, lots, and lawn crypts, and sell
cemetery-related merchandise and services, including stone and bronze memorials, markers,
merchandise installations, and burial openings and closings. We also sell preneed funeral and
cemetery products and services whereby a customer contractually agrees to the terms of certain
products and services to be provided in the future.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Service
Corporation International and all subsidiaries in which we hold a controlling financial interest.
Our financial statements also include the accounts of the funeral merchandise and service trusts,
cemetery merchandise and service trusts, and cemetery perpetual care trusts in which we have a
variable interest and are the primary beneficiary. Our interim unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements are unaudited but include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring
accruals and any other adjustments, which management considers necessary for a fair presentation of
our results for these periods. Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in a manner consistent with the accounting policies described in our annual report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, unless otherwise disclosed herein, and should be read in
conjunction therewith. The accompanying year-end condensed consolidated balance sheet data was
derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Operating results for
interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full
year period.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts to conform to the current
period financial statement presentation with no effect on our previously reported results of
operations, consolidated financial position, or cash flows.
We recorded several immaterial adjustments
to correct errors related to prior accounting periods during the three months ended March 31, 2009. We do not
believe these adjustments are quantitatively or qualitatively material to our condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended
March 31, 2009, nor were such items quantitatively or qualitatively material to any of our prior annual or quarterly
financial statements. The net impact of these adjustments was a decrease to our pre-tax income and net income in the
amount of $2.5 million and $1.5 million, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management
to make estimates and assumptions as described in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008. These estimates and assumptions may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
As a result, actual results could differ from these estimates.
Business Combinations
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS
141(R)), which establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures
in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired (including goodwill), the liabilities
assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree. We will apply the provisions provided in
SFAS 141(R) to all business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1,
2009 and certain future income tax effects related to our prior business combinations, should they
arise. In these acquisitions, tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed will be recorded at fair value and goodwill will be recognized for any difference between the price of the acquisition and our fair value determination.
8
Noncontrolling Interests
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS 160), which establishes accounting and reporting
standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. SFAS 160 clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary, which is sometimes
referred to as an unconsolidated investment, is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity
that should be reported as a component of equity in the consolidated financial statements. Among
other requirements, SFAS 160 requires consolidated net income to be reported at amounts
attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest. It also requires disclosure, on
the face of the consolidated income statement, of the amounts of consolidated net income
attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest. We adopted the provisions of SFAS
160 on January 1, 2009. As a result, we have modified our condensed consolidated statement of
operations, condensed consolidated balance sheet, condensed consolidated statement of cash flows,
and condensed consolidated statement of stockholders equity to incorporate the required disclosure
of noncontrolling interest information as required by SFAS 160.
During our examination
of SFAS 160 and its impact on our current accounting, we determined that balances historically designated as non-controlling
interest in our consolidated preneed funeral and cemetery trusts and our cemetery perpetual care trusts
do not meet the criteria for non-controlling interest as prescribed by SFAS 160. SFAS 160 indicates that only a
financial instrument classified as equity in the trusts financial statements can be a non-controlling interest
in the consolidated financial statements. The interest related to our merchandise and service trusts is classified as a liability because
the preneed contracts underlying these trusts are unconditionally redeemable upon the occurrence of an event that is certain to occur.
In addition, since the earnings
from our cemetery perpetual care trusts are used to support the maintenance of our cemeteries, the interest
in these trusts also retains the characteristics of a liability. Accordingly, effective December 31, 2008, we re-characterized
the amounts
historically described as Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts as either Deferred preneed funeral revenues held in trust or
Deferred preneed cemetery revenues held in trust, as appropriate. Additionally, we re-characterized the
amounts historically described as
Non-controlling interest in cemetery perpetual care trusts
as Care Trusts Corpus.
Fair Value Measurements
We measure the available-for-sale
securities held by our funeral merchandise and service,
cemetery merchandise and service, and cemetery perpetual care trusts at fair value on a recurring
basis in accordance with SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157).
SFAS 157 defines
fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in
an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, establishes a framework
for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about instruments measured at fair value. SFAS
157 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The
valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or
liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for
identical assets or liabilities in active markets; |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets
or liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability,
either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument; |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair
value measurement. |
An assets or liabilitys categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the
lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Certain available-for-sale securities held by our funeral merchandise and service, cemetery
merchandise and service, and cemetery perpetual care trusts have been classified in Level 3 of
the SFAS 157 hierarchy due to significant management judgment required as a result of the absence
of quoted market prices, inherent lack of liquidity, or the long-term nature of the securities. For
additional disclosures required by SFAS 157 for all of our available-for-sale securities, see Note 4, 5, and 6.
In February 2008, the
FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No.
157 (FSP 157-2). FSP FAS 157-2 provided a one-year deferral of the effective date of SFAS 157 for
non-financial assets and liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed in the
financial statements at fair value at least annually. In accordance with FSP 157-2, we adopted the
provisions of FAS 157 for our non-financial assets and liabilities, such as goodwill and
property and equipment, that we disclose or recognize at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of
January 1, 2009. As none of our non-financial assets or liabilities within the scope of FAS 157 experienced
an event that required fair value measurement in the first quarter of 2009, our adoption for these assets and
liabilities had no impact on our results of operations, consolidated financial position, or cash
flows.
3. Recently Issued Accounting Standards
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
In April 2009, the
FASB issued
FSP No. 115-2 and 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (FSP
FAS 115-2 and 124-2), which modifies the requirements for recognizing
other-than-temporary-impairment on debt securities and significantly changes the impairment model
for such securities. The FSP also modifies the presentation of other-than-temporary impairment
losses and increases related disclosure requirements. The FSP is effective for us in the second
quarter of 2009 and we are currently assessing the impact of adoption on our results of operations
and consolidated financial position.
9
Interim Fair Value Disclosures
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair
Value of Financial Statements (FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1), which requires companies to disclose
the fair value of financial instruments within interim financial statements, adding to the current
requirement to provide those disclosures annually. The FSP is effective for us in the second
quarter of 2009 and we will include additional disclosures as required.
Fair Value Measurements
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP
No. 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and
Level of Activity for the Asset of Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying
Transactions That Are Not Orderly (FSP FAS 157-4). FSP FAS 157-4 provides guidance on how to determine the fair
value of assets and liabilities in an environment where the volume and level of activity for the
asset or liability have significantly decreased and re-emphasizes that the objective of a fair
value measurement remains an exit price. The FSP is effective for us in the second quarter of
2009. The adoption of FSP FAS 157-4 is not expected to have a material impact on our results of
operations, consolidated financial position, or cash flows.
4. Preneed Funeral Activities
Preneed
funeral receivables, net and trust investments represent trust investments, including investment earnings, and customer receivables, net of
unearned finance charges, related to unperformed, price-guaranteed preneed funeral contracts. Our
funeral merchandise and service trusts are defined as variable interest entities pursuant to FASB
Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (revised December 2003 an
interpretation of ARB No. 51 (FIN46(R)). In accordance with FIN46(R), we have determined that
we are the primary beneficiary of these trusts, as we absorb a majority of the losses and returns
associated with these trusts. Our cemetery trust investments detailed in Notes 5 and 6 are also
accounted for in accordance with FIN46(R). When we receive payments from the
customer, we deposit the amount required by law into the trust and reclassify the corresponding
amount from Deferred preneed funeral revenues into Deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust.
Amounts are withdrawn from the trusts after the contract obligations are performed. Cash flows from
preneed funeral contracts are presented as operating cash flows in our condensed consolidated statement of
cash flows.
10
The table below sets forth the investment-related activities associated with our preneed
funeral merchandise and service trusts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Deposits
|
|
$ |
17,116 |
|
|
$ |
20,912 |
|
Withdrawals
|
|
|
23,175 |
|
|
|
38,916 |
|
Purchases of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
66,910 |
|
|
|
135,282 |
|
Sales of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
65,061 |
|
|
|
100,720 |
|
Realized gains from sales of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
984 |
|
|
|
20,799 |
|
Realized losses from sales of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
(13,895 |
) |
|
|
(14,998 |
) |
The components of Preneed funeral receivables, net and trust investments in our unaudited condensed
consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Trust investments, at market |
|
$ |
644,080 |
|
|
$ |
636,712 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
127,593 |
|
|
|
125,657 |
|
Insurance-backed fixed income securities |
|
|
208,712 |
|
|
|
216,394 |
|
Receivables from customers |
|
|
251,337 |
|
|
|
249,224 |
|
Unearned finance charge |
|
|
(6,321 |
) |
|
|
(6,316 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,225,401 |
|
|
|
1,221,671 |
|
Allowance for cancellation |
|
|
(31,803 |
) |
|
|
(29,979 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed funeral receivables, net and trust investments |
|
$ |
1,193,598 |
|
|
$ |
1,191,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cost and market values
associated with our funeral merchandise and service trust investments recorded at fair
market value at March 31, 2009 are detailed below. Cost reflects the
investment (net of redemptions) of control holders in common trust funds, mutual funds, and private
equity investments. Fair market value represents the value of the underlying securities held by the
common trust funds, mutual funds at published values, and the estimated market value of private
equity investments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair Market |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Fixed income securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
56,603 |
|
|
$ |
1,065 |
|
|
$ |
(6,119 |
) |
|
$ |
51,549 |
|
Canadian government |
|
|
95,865 |
|
|
|
901 |
|
|
|
(853 |
) |
|
|
95,913 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
22,408 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
(359 |
) |
|
|
22,238 |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
17,645 |
|
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
18,478 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
Equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
376,942 |
|
|
|
855 |
|
|
|
(125,030 |
) |
|
|
252,767 |
|
Mutual funds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
102,461 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
(38,010 |
) |
|
|
64,615 |
|
Fixed income |
|
|
156,804 |
|
|
|
1,958 |
|
|
|
(29,714 |
) |
|
|
129,048 |
|
Private equity |
|
|
15,875 |
|
|
|
1,520 |
|
|
|
(6,312 |
) |
|
|
11,083 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,835 |
) |
|
|
1,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust investments |
|
$ |
849,365 |
|
|
$ |
7,487 |
|
|
$ |
(209,234 |
) |
|
$ |
647,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Assets associated with businesses held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,538 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
644,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities held by the common trust
funds and mutual funds are classified as Level 1 investments pursuant to the three-level valuation
hierarchy provided in SFAS 157. Our investments classified as Level 1 securities include common
stock and mutual funds.
Where quoted market prices are not available for the specific security, fair values are
estimated by using either quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or a fair value
model with observable inputs that include a combination of interest rates, yield curves, credit
risks, prepayment speeds, rating, and tax-exempt status. These securities include United States (U.S.)
Treasury, Canadian government, corporate, mortgage-backed and asset-backed fixed income securities,
all of which are classified within Level 2 of the SFAS 157 valuation hierarchy.
The valuation of private equity and other investments requires significant management judgment
due to the absence of quoted market prices, inherent lack of liquidity, and the long-term nature of
such assets. The fair value of these investments is estimated based on the market value of the
underlying real estate and private equity investments. The underlying real estate value is
determined using the most recent available appraisals. Private equity investments are valued using
market appraisals or a discounted cash flow methodology depending on the nature of the underlying
assets. The appraisals assess value based on a combination of replacement cost, comparative sales
analysis, and discounted cash flow analysis. Our private equity and other investments are included
within Level 3 of the SFAS 157 valuation hierarchy.
The inputs into the fair value of our market-based funeral merchandise and service trust
investments are categorized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
Quoted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Prices |
|
Significant Other |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
in Active Markets |
|
Observable Inputs |
|
Unobservable |
|
Fair Market |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
Inputs (Level 3) |
|
Value |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Trust investments
|
|
$ |
446,430 |
|
|
$ |
188,200 |
|
|
$ |
12,988 |
|
|
$ |
647,618 |
|
The change in our market-based funeral merchandise and service trust investments with
significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Fair market value |
|
$ |
40,880 |
|
|
$ |
37,865 |
|
Net unrealized (losses) gains included in Other comprehensive loss (1) |
|
|
(5,616 |
) |
|
|
3,639 |
|
Net gains included in Other expense, net (2) |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, sales, contributions, and distributions, net |
|
|
(404 |
) |
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers out of Level 3 |
|
|
(21,891 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair market value |
|
$ |
12,988 |
|
|
$ |
41,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All gains (losses) recognized in Other comprehensive loss for funeral merchandise and service
trust investments are attributable to our preneed customers and are offset by a corresponding
reclassification in Other comprehensive loss to Deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust. See Note 7 for further
information related to our Deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust. |
|
(2) |
|
All gains (losses) recognized in Other expense, net for our funeral merchandise and service
trust investments are attributable to our preneed customers and are offset by a corresponding
reclassification in Other expense, net to Deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust. See
Note 7 for further information related to our Deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust. |
12
Maturity dates of our fixed income securities range from 2009 to 2038. Maturities of fixed
income securities at March 31, 2009 are estimated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Market |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
78,841 |
|
Due in one to five years |
|
|
44,323 |
|
Due in five to ten years |
|
|
38,235 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
26,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
188,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from all trust investments are recognized in funeral revenues when a service is
performed or merchandise is delivered. In addition, we are entitled to retain, in certain
jurisdictions, a portion of collected customer payments when a customer cancels a preneed contract;
these amounts are also recognized in current revenues. Recognized earnings (realized and
unrealized) related to these trust investments were $5.9 million and $11.2 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
We assess our trust investments for other-than-temporary declines in fair value on a quarterly
basis. Impairment charges, resulting from this assessment, are recognized as investment losses in
Other expense, net and a decrease to Preneed funeral
receivables, net and trust investments. These
investment losses, if any, are offset by a corresponding reclassification in Other expense, net
which reduces Deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust. See Note 7 for further information
related to our Deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust. In the first quarter of 2009, we
recorded a $6.7 million impairment charge for other-than-temporary declines in fair value related
to unrealized losses on certain equity securities.
We have determined that the remaining unrealized losses in our funeral
trust investments at
March 31, 2009 are considered temporary in nature, as the unrealized losses
were due to temporary fluctuations in interest rates and equity prices. The investments are
diversified across multiple industry segments using a balanced allocation strategy to minimize
long-term risk. The unrealized losses reflect the effects of the current economic crisis. We
believe that none of the securities are other-than-temporarily impaired based on our analysis of
the investments. Our analysis included a review of the portfolio holdings and discussions with the
individual money managers as to the sector exposures, credit ratings, and the severity and duration
of the unrealized losses.
13
5. Preneed Cemetery Activities
Preneed cemetery receivables, net and trust investments represent trust investments, including investment earnings, and customer receivables, net of
unearned finance charges, for contracts sold in advance of when the property interment rights,
merchandise, or services are needed. Our cemetery merchandise and service trusts are defined as
variable interest entities pursuant to FIN46(R). In accordance with FIN46(R), we have determined
that we are the primary beneficiary of these trusts, as we absorb a majority of the losses and
returns associated with these trusts. The trust investments detailed in Notes 4 and 6 are also
accounted for in accordance with FIN46(R). When we receive payments from the
customer, we deposit the amount required by law into the trust and reclassify the corresponding amount
from Deferred preneed cemetery revenues into Deferred preneed cemetery
receipts held in trust. Amounts are withdrawn from the trusts when the contract obligations are
performed. Cash flows from preneed cemetery contracts are presented as operating cash flows in our
condensed consolidated statement of cash flows.
The table below sets forth the investment-related activities associated with our preneed
cemetery merchandise and service trusts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Deposits
|
|
$ |
19,343 |
|
|
$ |
25,301 |
|
Withdrawals
|
|
|
28,868 |
|
|
|
31,209 |
|
Purchases of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
56,872 |
|
|
|
565,311 |
|
Sales of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
53,662 |
|
|
|
104,268 |
|
Realized gains from sales of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
1,039 |
|
|
|
11,455 |
|
Realized losses from sales of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
(28,953 |
) |
|
|
(16,491 |
) |
The components of Preneed cemetery receivables, net and trust investments in our unaudited
condensed consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Trust investments, at market |
|
$ |
663,613 |
|
|
$ |
659,149 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
159,568 |
|
|
|
139,753 |
|
Receivables from customers |
|
|
340,153 |
|
|
|
341,688 |
|
Unearned finance charges |
|
|
(46,667 |
) |
|
|
(48,999 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,116,667 |
|
|
|
1,091,591 |
|
Allowance for cancellation |
|
|
(28,890 |
) |
|
|
(28,639 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed cemetery receivables, net and trust investments |
|
$ |
1,087,777 |
|
|
$ |
1,062,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cost and market values associated with our cemetery merchandise and service trust
investments recorded at fair market value at March 31, 2009 are detailed
below. Cost reflects the investment (net of redemptions) of control holders in common trust funds,
mutual funds, and private equity investments. Fair market value represents the value of the
underlying securities held by the common trust funds, mutual funds at published values, and the
estimated market value of private equity investments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair Market |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Fixed income securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
56,543 |
|
|
$ |
753 |
|
|
$ |
(8,979 |
) |
|
$ |
48,317 |
|
Canadian government |
|
|
11,253 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
11,451 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
8,252 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
8,258 |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
13,824 |
|
|
|
614 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
14,434 |
|
Equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
489,066 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
(157,092 |
) |
|
|
332,235 |
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair Market |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Mutual funds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
211,157 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(77,272 |
) |
|
|
133,926 |
|
Fixed income |
|
|
202,847 |
|
|
|
758 |
|
|
|
(51,067 |
) |
|
|
152,538 |
|
Private equity |
|
|
8,272 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
(4,571 |
) |
|
|
4,064 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,991 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
(3,259 |
) |
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust investments |
|
$ |
1,005,205 |
|
|
$ |
3,386 |
|
|
$ |
(302,454 |
) |
|
$ |
706,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Assets associated with businesses held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42,524 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
663,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities held by the common trust
funds and mutual funds are classified as Level 1 investments pursuant to the three-level valuation
hierarchy provided in SFAS 157. Our investments classified as Level 1 securities include common
stock and mutual funds.
Where quoted market prices are not available for the specific security, fair values are
estimated by using either quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or a fair value
model with observable inputs that include a combination of interest rates, yield curves, credit
risks, prepayment speeds, rating, and tax-exempt status. These securities included U.S.
Treasury, Canadian government, corporate, and mortgage-backed fixed income securities, all of
which are classified within Level 2 of the SFAS 157 valuation hierarchy.
The valuation of private equity and other investments requires significant management judgment
due to the absence of quoted market prices, inherent lack of liquidity, and the long-term nature of
such assets. The fair value of these investments is estimated based on the market value of the
underlying real estate and private equity investments. The underlying real estate value is
determined using the most recent available appraisals. Private equity investments are valued using
market appraisals or a discounted cash flow methodology depending on the nature of the underlying
assets. The appraisals assess value based on a combination of replacement cost, comparative sales
analysis, and discounted cash flow analysis. Our private equity and other investments are included
within Level 3 of the SFAS 157 valuation hierarchy.
The inputs into the fair value of our market-based cemetery merchandise and service trust
investments are categorized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
Quoted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Prices |
|
Significant |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
in Active Markets |
|
Other Observable |
|
Unobservable Inputs |
|
Fair Market |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
Inputs (Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
|
Value |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Trust investments
|
|
$ |
618,699 |
|
|
$ |
82,460 |
|
|
$ |
4,978 |
|
|
$ |
706,137 |
|
15
The change in our market-based cemetery merchandise and service trust investments with
significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Fair market value |
|
$ |
31,837 |
|
|
$ |
21,809 |
|
Net unrealized (losses) gains included in Other comprehensive loss (1) |
|
|
(10,823 |
) |
|
|
3,183 |
|
Net realized gains included in Other expense, net (2) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases, sales, contributions, and distributions, net |
|
|
(461 |
) |
|
|
(221 |
) |
Transfers out of Level 3 |
|
|
(15,593 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair market value |
|
$ |
4,978 |
|
|
$ |
24,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All gains (losses) recognized in Other comprehensive loss for cemetery merchandise and
service trust investments are attributable to our preneed customers and are offset by a
corresponding reclassification in Other comprehensive loss to Deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust. See
Note 7 for further information related to our Deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in
trust. |
|
(2) |
|
All gains (losses) recognized in Other expense, net for our cemetery merchandise and service
trust investments are attributable to our preneed customers and are offset by a corresponding
reclassification in Other expense, net to Deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust. See Note 7 for
further information related to our Deferred preneed funeral and receipts cemetery held in trust. |
Maturity dates of our fixed
income securities range from 2009 to 2038. Maturities of fixed
income securities at March 31, 2009 are estimated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Market |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
8,128 |
|
Due in one to five years |
|
|
24,652 |
|
Due in five to ten years |
|
|
24,106 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
25,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
82,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from all trust
investments are recognized in cemetery revenues when a service is
performed or merchandise is delivered. In addition, we are entitled to retain, in certain
jurisdictions, a portion of collected customer payments when a customer cancels a preneed
contract; these amounts are also recognized in current revenues. Recognized (losses) earnings
(realized and unrealized) related to these trust investments were $(1.1) million and $4.5 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
We assess our trust investments for other-than-temporary declines in fair value on a quarterly
basis. Impairment charges, resulting from this assessment, are recognized as investment losses in
Other expense, net and a decrease to Preneed cemetery receivables, net and trust investments. These
investment losses, if any, are offset by a corresponding reclassification in Other expense, net
which reduces Deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust. See Note 7 for further information
related to our Deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust. In the first quarter of 2009, we
recorded a $9.6 million impairment charge for other-than-temporary declines in fair value related
to unrealized losses on certain equity securities.
We have determined that the remaining unrealized losses in our cemetery trust investments at
March 31, 2009 are considered temporary in nature, as the unrealized losses
were due to temporary fluctuations in interest rates and equity prices. The investments are
diversified across multiple industry segments using a balanced allocation strategy to minimize
long-term risk. The unrealized losses reflect the effects of the current economic crisis. We
believe that none of the securities are other-than-temporarily impaired based on our analysis of
the investments. Our analysis included a review of the portfolio holdings and discussions with the individual
money managers as to the sector exposures, credit ratings, and the severity and duration of the
unrealized losses.
16
6. Cemetery Perpetual Care Trusts
We are required by state or provincial law to pay into cemetery perpetual care trusts a
portion of the proceeds from the sale of cemetery property interment rights. Our cemetery
perpetual care trusts are defined as variable interest entities pursuant to FIN46(R). In
accordance with FIN46(R), we have determined that we are the primary beneficiary of these trusts,
as we absorb a majority of the losses and returns associated with these trusts. The merchandise and
service trust investments detailed in Notes 4 and 5 are also accounted for in
accordance with FIN46(R). We consolidate our cemetery perpetual care trust investments with a
corresponding amount recorded as Care trusts corpus. Cash flows from cemetery perpetual care
contracts are presented as operating cash flows in our condensed consolidated statement of cash flows.
The table below sets forth the investment-related activities associated with our cemetery
perpetual care trusts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Deposits
|
|
$ |
5,367 |
|
|
$ |
5,824 |
|
Withdrawals
|
|
|
9,145 |
|
|
|
5,177 |
|
Purchases of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
44,847 |
|
|
|
58,785 |
|
Sales of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
32,475 |
|
|
|
61,433 |
|
Realized gains from sales of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
9,487 |
|
Realized losses from sales of available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
(11,521 |
) |
|
|
(12,993 |
) |
The components of Cemetery perpetual care trust investments in our unaudited condensed
consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Trust investments, at market |
|
$ |
610,170 |
|
|
$ |
673,237 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
87,365 |
|
|
|
71,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments |
|
$ |
697,535 |
|
|
$ |
744,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The cost and market values associated with our cemetery perpetual care trust investments
recorded at fair market value at March 31, 2009 are detailed below. Cost
reflects the investment (net of redemptions) of control holders in common trust funds, mutual
funds, and private equity investments. Fair market value represents the value of the underlying
securities or cash held by the common trust funds, mutual funds at published values, and the
estimated market value of private equity investments.
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair Market |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Fixed income securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
6,065 |
|
|
$ |
973 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
7,037 |
|
Canadian government |
|
|
22,156 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
22,501 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
43,802 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
(7,019 |
) |
|
|
37,110 |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
3,057 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
3,207 |
|
Equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
7,292 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,782 |
) |
|
|
5,510 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
93,710 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
(18,660 |
) |
|
|
75,543 |
|
Mutual funds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
87,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,887 |
) |
|
|
63,941 |
|
Fixed income |
|
|
520,782 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(120,643 |
) |
|
|
400,152 |
|
Private equity |
|
|
19,495 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(9,769 |
) |
|
|
9,727 |
|
Other |
|
|
15,843 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
(10,635 |
) |
|
|
5,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments |
|
$ |
820,030 |
|
|
$ |
3,075 |
|
|
$ |
(192,415 |
) |
|
$ |
630,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Assets associated with businesses held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,520 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
610,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities held by the common trust
funds and mutual funds are classified as Level 1 investments pursuant to the three-level valuation
hierarchy provided in SFAS 157. Our investments classified as Level 1 securities include common
stock and mutual funds.
Where quoted market prices are not available for the specific security, fair values are
estimated by using either quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or a fair value
model with observable inputs that include a combination of interest rates, yield curves, credit
risks, prepayment speeds, rating, and tax-exempt status. These securities included
U.S. Treasury, Canadian government, corporate, mortgage-backed fixed income securities, and
preferred stock equity securities, all of which are classified within Level 2 of the SFAS 157
valuation hierarchy.
18
The valuation of private equity and other investments requires significant management judgment
due to the absence of quoted market prices, inherent lack of liquidity, and the long-term nature of
such assets. The fair value of these investments is estimated based on the market value of the
underlying real estate and private equity investments. The underlying real estate value is
determined using the most recent available appraisals. Private equity investments are valued using
market appraisals or a discounted cash flow methodology depending on the nature of the underlying
assets. The appraisals assess value based on a combination of replacement cost, comparative sales
analysis, and discounted cash flow analysis. Our private equity and other investments are included
within Level 3 of the SFAS 157 valuation hierarchy.
The inputs into the fair value of our market-based cemetery perpetual care trust investments
are categorized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
Quoted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market Prices |
|
Significant |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
Other Observable |
|
Unobservable Inputs |
|
Fair Market |
|
|
Markets (Level 1) |
|
Inputs (Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
|
Value |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Trust investments |
|
$ |
539,636 |
|
|
$ |
75,365 |
|
|
$ |
15,689 |
|
|
$ |
630,690 |
|
The change in our market-based cemetery perpetual care trust investments with significant
unobservable inputs (Level 3) is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Fair market value |
|
$ |
48,276 |
|
|
$ |
32,644 |
|
Net unrealized (losses) gains included in Other comprehensive loss (1) |
|
|
(22,007 |
) |
|
|
3,331 |
|
Net realized losses included in Other expense, net(2) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchases, sales, contributions, and distributions, net |
|
|
(3,363 |
) |
|
|
(2,714 |
) |
Transfers out of Level 3 |
|
|
(7,212 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair market value |
|
$ |
15,689 |
|
|
$ |
33,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All gains (losses) recognized in Other comprehensive loss for our cemetery perpetual care
trust investments are offset by
a corresponding reclassification in Other comprehensive loss
to our Care trusts corpus. See Note 7 for further information related to our Care
trusts corpus. |
|
(2) |
|
All gains (losses) recognized in Other expense, net for our cemetery perpetual care trust
investments are offset by a corresponding
reclassification in Other expense, net to Care trusts corpus. See Note 7 for further
information related to our Care trusts corpus. |
Maturity dates of our fixed income securities range from 2009 to 2038. Maturities of fixed
income securities at March 31, 2009 are estimated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Market |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
9,980 |
|
Due in one to five years |
|
|
33,069 |
|
Due in five to ten years |
|
|
11,407 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
15,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
69,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
Distributable earnings from these cemetery perpetual care trust investments are recognized in
current cemetery revenues to the extent we incur qualifying cemetery maintenance costs. Recognized
earnings related to these cemetery perpetual care trust investments were $8.5 million and $9.8
million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
We assess our trust investments for other-than-temporary declines in fair value on a quarterly
basis. Impairment charges, resulting from this assessment, are recognized as investment losses, in
Other expense, net, and a decrease to Cemetery perpetual care trust investments. These investment
losses, if any, are offset by a corresponding reclassification in Other expense, net which reduces
Care trusts corpus. See Note 7 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further
information related to our Care trusts corpus. In the first quarter of 2009, we recorded a $4.2
million impairment charge for other-than-temporary declines in fair value related to unrealized
losses on certain equity securities.
19
We have determined that the remaining unrealized losses in our cemetery perpetual care trust
investments at March 31, 2009, are considered temporary in nature, as the unrealized losses were due to temporary
fluctuations in interest rates and equity prices. The investments are diversified across multiple
industry segments using a balanced allocation strategy to minimize long-term risk. The unrealized
losses reflect the effects of the current economic crisis. We believe that none of the securities
are other-than-temporarily impaired based on our analysis of the investments. Our analysis included a
review of the portfolio holdings and discussions with the individual money managers as to the sector
exposures, credit ratings, and the severity and duration of the unrealized losses.
7. Deferred Preneed Funeral and Cemetery Receipts Held in Trust and Care Trusts Corpus
Deferred Preneed Funeral and Cemetery Receipts Held in Trust
We consolidate the merchandise and service trusts associated with our preneed funeral and
cemetery activities in accordance with FIN46(R). Although FIN46(R) requires the consolidation of
the merchandise and service trusts, it does not change the legal relationships among the trusts,
us, or our customers. The customers are the legal beneficiaries of these merchandise and service
trusts, and therefore their interests in these trusts represent a liability.
The components of Deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust in our
unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are detailed
below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Preneed |
|
|
Preneed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
|
Cemetery |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Trust investments, at market |
|
$ |
644,080 |
|
|
$ |
663,613 |
|
|
$ |
1,307,693 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
127,593 |
|
|
|
159,568 |
|
|
|
287,161 |
|
Insurance-backed fixed income securities |
|
|
208,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208,712 |
|
Accrued trust operating payables, deferred tax assets, and other |
|
|
18,228 |
|
|
|
27,059 |
|
|
|
45,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust |
|
$ |
998,613 |
|
|
$ |
850,240 |
|
|
$ |
1,848,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Preneed |
|
|
Preneed |
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
|
Cemetery |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Trust investments, at market |
|
$ |
636,712 |
|
|
$ |
659,149 |
|
|
$ |
1,295,861 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
125,657 |
|
|
|
139,753 |
|
|
|
265,410 |
|
Insurance-backed fixed income securities |
|
|
216,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216,394 |
|
Accrued trust operating payables, deferred tax assets, and other |
|
|
16,816 |
|
|
|
23,184 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust |
|
$ |
995,579 |
|
|
$ |
822,086 |
|
|
$ |
1,817,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Care Trusts Corpus
The Care trusts corpus reflected in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet
represents the cemetery perpetual care trusts, including the related accrued expenses, deferred tax
assets, and other long-term liabilities of our cemetery perpetual care trusts.
The components of Care trusts corpus in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet at
March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are detailed below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Trust investments, at market |
|
$ |
610,170 |
|
|
$ |
673,237 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
87,365 |
|
|
|
71,521 |
|
Accrued trust operating payables, deferred tax assets, and other |
|
|
34,967 |
|
|
|
27,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Care trusts corpus |
|
$ |
732,502 |
|
|
$ |
772,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Expense, Net
The components of Other expense, net in our unaudited condensed consolidated statement of
operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 are detailed below. See Notes 4, 5,
and 6 for further discussion of the amounts related to the funeral, cemetery, and cemetery
perpetual care trusts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
|
Cemetery |
|
|
Perpetual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trusts |
|
|
Trusts |
|
|
Care Trusts |
|
|
Other, Net |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Realized gains |
|
$ |
984 |
|
|
$ |
1,039 |
|
|
$ |
820 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,843 |
|
Realized losses and impairment charges |
|
|
(20,555 |
) |
|
|
(38,535 |
) |
|
|
(15,676 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74,766 |
) |
Interest, dividend, and other ordinary income |
|
|
1,686 |
|
|
|
5,471 |
|
|
|
12,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,534 |
|
Trust expenses and income taxes |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
1,241 |
|
|
|
(415 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net trust investment loss |
|
|
(17,895 |
) |
|
|
(30,784 |
) |
|
|
(2,894 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,573 |
) |
Reclassification to deferred preneed funeral
and cemetery receipts held in trust |
|
|
17,895 |
|
|
|
30,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,679 |
|
Reclassification to care trusts corpus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred preneed funeral and cemetery
receipts held in trust and care trusts
corpus |
|
|
17,895 |
|
|
|
30,784 |
|
|
|
2,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,573 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,546 |
) |
|
|
(1,546 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense, net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,546 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,546 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
|
Cemetery |
|
|
Perpetual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trusts |
|
|
Trusts |
|
|
Care Trusts |
|
|
Other, Net |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Realized gains |
|
$ |
20,799 |
|
|
$ |
11,455 |
|
|
$ |
9,487 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
41,741 |
|
Realized losses |
|
|
(14,998 |
) |
|
|
(16,491 |
) |
|
|
(12,993 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,482 |
) |
Interest, dividend, and other ordinary income |
|
|
5,385 |
|
|
|
4,236 |
|
|
|
8,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,007 |
|
Trust expenses and income taxes |
|
|
(4,663 |
) |
|
|
(4,422 |
) |
|
|
(536 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,621 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net trust investment income (loss) |
|
|
6,523 |
|
|
|
(5,222 |
) |
|
|
4,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,645 |
|
Reclassification to deferred preneed funeral
and cemetery receipts held in trust |
|
|
(6,523 |
) |
|
|
5,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,301 |
) |
Reclassification to care trusts corpus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,344 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,344 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred preneed funeral
and cemetery receipts
held in trust and care trusts corpus |
|
|
(6,523 |
) |
|
|
5,222 |
|
|
|
(4,344 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,645 |
) |
Other expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(748 |
) |
|
|
(748 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense, net |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(748 |
) |
|
$ |
(748 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
8. Income Taxes
Income tax expense during interim periods is based on our estimated annual effective income
tax rate plus any discrete items which are recorded in the period in which they occur. Discrete
items include, among others, such events as tax audit settlements,
expiration of statute of limitations and increases or decreases in valuation allowances due to
changes in projected future earnings. For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, our
effective tax rate was 37.1% and 37.6%, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate is
primarily due to lower Canadian statutory tax rates.
We file numerous federal, state and foreign income tax returns. A number of years may elapse
before particular tax matters, for which we have unrecognized tax benefits, are audited and finally
settled. In the United States, the Internal Revenue Service has recently completed its field work for
tax years 1999 through 2002 and is currently auditing tax years 2003 through 2005. Various state
and foreign jurisdictions are auditing years through 2005. It is reasonably possible that one or
more of the multi-jurisdictional audits will be settled by December 31, 2009, and if favorably
resolved could result in a significant reduction in the amount of our unrecognized tax benefits.
9. Debt
Debt as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
7.7% Notes due April 2009 |
|
$ |
28,731 |
|
|
$ |
28,731 |
|
7.875% Debentures due February 2013 |
|
|
55,627 |
|
|
|
55,627 |
|
7.375% Senior notes due October 2014 |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
6.75% Notes due April 2015 |
|
|
192,750 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
6.75% Notes due April 2016 |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
7.0% Notes due June 2017 |
|
|
298,000 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
7.625% Senior notes due October 2018 |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
7.5% Notes due April 2027 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
Series B senior notes due November 2011 |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
Obligations under capital leases |
|
|
126,386 |
|
|
|
109,782 |
|
Mortgage notes and other debt, maturities through 2050 |
|
|
47,471 |
|
|
|
58,976 |
|
Unamortized pricing discounts and other |
|
|
(4,398 |
) |
|
|
(4,608 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
$ |
1,844,567 |
|
|
$ |
1,848,508 |
|
Less current maturities |
|
|
(55,897 |
) |
|
|
(27,104 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,788,670 |
|
|
$ |
1,821,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of debt at March 31, 2009 were primarily comprised of our 7.7% Notes due
April 2009, convertible debentures, and capital lease obligations. Our consolidated debt had a
weighted average interest rate of 6.50% at March 31, 2009 and 6.70% at
December 31, 2008. Approximately 86% and 87% of our total debt had a fixed interest rate at
March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Bank Credit Facility
We entered into a five-year $450 million bank credit facility in November 2006 with a
syndicate of financial institutions, comprised of a $300 million revolving credit facility and a
$150 million term loan facility, including a sublimit of $175 million for letters of credit.
22
The bank credit facility matures in November 2011. As of March 31, 2009, we have used the
facility to support $52.7 million of letters of credit. The credit facility provides us with
flexibility for working capital, if needed, and is guaranteed by our domestic subsidiaries. The
subsidiary guaranty is a guaranty of payment of the outstanding amount of the total lending
commitment, including letters of credit. The credit facility contains certain financial covenants,
including a minimum interest coverage ratio, a maximum leverage ratio, maximum capital expenditure
limitations, and certain cash distribution and share repurchase restrictions. We pay a quarterly
fee on the unused commitment, which ranges from 0.25% to 0.50%.
Debt Extinguishments and Reductions
In the first quarter of 2009, we purchased $7.3 million aggregate principal amount of our
6.75% Notes due April 2015 and $2.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 7.0% Notes due June
2017 on the open market. As a result of these transactions, we recognized a gain of $1.6 million
recorded in Gain on early extinguishment of debt
in the first quarter of 2009, which represents the write-off of unamortized deferred
loan costs of $0.2 million and a $1.8 million discount on the
purchase of the Notes.
In the first quarter of 2008, we repaid $45.2 million aggregate principal amount of our 6.50%
Notes due March 2008. There was no gain or loss recognized as a result of this repayment.
Subsequent to March 31, 2009, we repaid the $28.7 million balance of our 7.7% Notes due April 2009.
There was no gain or loss recognized as a result of this payment. In
addition, we repaid $23.5 million of our 7.875% Debentures due February 2013, $12.5 million of our 6.75% Notes due April 2015, $4.5 million of our 6.75% Notes due April 2016, and $3.0 million of our 7.0% Notes due June 2017.
As a result of these transactions, we will recognize a gain of approximately
$1.2 million recorded in Gain on early extinguishment of debt in the second quarter
of 2009.
Capital Leases
During the three months ended March 31, 2009
and 2008, we acquired $11.2 million and $6.7
million, respectively, of transportation equipment using capital leases.
10. Share-Based Compensation
Stock Benefit Plans
We utilize the Black-Scholes option valuation model for estimating the fair value of our stock
options. This model allows the use of a range of assumptions related to volatility, the risk-free
interest rate, the expected life, and the dividend yield. The expected volatility utilized in the valuation model
is based on the historical volatility of our stock price.
The dividend yield and expected holding period are based on historical experience and managements estimate
of future events. The risk-free interest rate is derived from the U.S. Treasury yield curve based on the expected life of the option
in effect at the time of the grant. The fair values of our stock options are
calculated using the following weighted average assumptions for the three months ended March 31,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
Assumptions |
|
March 31, 2009 |
Dividend yield |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
32.3 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
Expected holding period |
|
|
5.0 years |
|
Stock Options
The following table sets forth stock option activity for the three months ended March 31,
2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
10,861,889 |
|
|
$ |
7.77 |
|
Granted |
|
|
3,995,080 |
|
|
|
4.19 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(631,000 |
) |
|
|
3.75 |
|
Canceled |
|
|
(48,167 |
) |
|
|
7.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
14,177,802 |
|
|
$ |
6.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
8,513,674 |
|
|
$ |
7.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2009, the unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options of $10.0
million is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.6 years.
23
Restricted Shares
Restricted share activity for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
Grant-Date |
|
|
|
shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Nonvested restricted shares at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
591,941 |
|
|
$ |
10.69 |
|
Granted |
|
|
829,400 |
|
|
|
4.19 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(301,300 |
) |
|
|
10.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested restricted shares at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,120,041 |
|
|
$ |
6.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2009, the unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock of
$6.1 million is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.7 years.
11. Stockholders Equity
Our components of Accumulated other comprehensive income are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Currency |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Translation |
|
|
Gains and |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Adjustment |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
36,649 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
36,649 |
|
Foreign currency translation effects |
|
|
(7,753 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,753 |
) |
Increase in net unrealized losses
associated with available-for-sale
securities of the trusts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,680 |
) |
|
|
(35,680 |
) |
Reclassification of net unrealized
losses activity attributable to the
deferred preneed funeral and
cemetery receipts held in trust and
care trusts corpus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,680 |
|
|
|
35,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
28,896 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
28,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars using the
current exchange rate. The U.S. dollar amount that arises from such translation, as well as
exchange gains and losses on intercompany balances of a long-term investment nature, are included
in the foreign currency translation adjustment in Accumulated other comprehensive income. Income
taxes are generally not provided on foreign currency translation adjustments.
Our components of comprehensive income are as follows for the three months ended March 31,
2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
34,380 |
|
|
$ |
41,519 |
|
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(7,753 |
) |
|
|
(22,106 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
26,627 |
|
|
$ |
19,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Dividends
24
On February 11, 2009, our Board of Directors approved a cash dividend of $.04 per common
share. At March 31, 2009, this dividend totaling $10.0 million was recorded in Accounts payable and
accrued liabilities and Capital in excess of par value in our unaudited condensed consolidated
balance sheet. This dividend was paid on April 30, 2009.
Share Repurchase Program
Subject to market conditions, normal trading restrictions, and limitations in our debt
covenants, we may make purchases in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions
under our stock repurchase program. We did not repurchase any shares of common stock in the three
months ended March 31, 2009. In the three months ended March 31, 2008, we purchased 3.0 million
shares of common stock at an aggregate cost of $36.6 million and an average cost per share of
$12.16. The remaining dollar value of shares authorized to be purchased under the share repurchase
program was $123.4 million at March 31, 2009.
12. Segment Reporting
Our operations are both product based and geographically based, and the reportable operating
segments presented below include our funeral and cemetery operations. Our geographic areas include
United States, Canada, and Germany.
Our reportable segment information is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable |
|
|
Funeral |
|
Cemetery |
|
Segments |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
364,909 |
|
|
$ |
145,686 |
|
|
$ |
510,595 |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
405,579 |
|
|
$ |
167,872 |
|
|
$ |
573,451 |
|
Gross profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
84,292 |
|
|
$ |
15,828 |
|
|
$ |
100,120 |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
108,578 |
|
|
$ |
29,019 |
|
|
$ |
137,597 |
|
The following table reconciles gross profit from reportable segments to our consolidated
income from continuing operations before income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Gross profit from reportable segments |
|
$ |
100,120 |
|
|
$ |
137,597 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(21,786 |
) |
|
|
(25,075 |
) |
Gain (loss) on divestitures and impairment charges, net |
|
|
7,230 |
|
|
|
(12,046 |
) |
Other operating expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,106 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
85,564 |
|
|
|
99,370 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(31,670 |
) |
|
|
(34,069 |
) |
Gain on early extinguishment of debt |
|
|
1,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
1,920 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
(1,546 |
) |
|
|
(748 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
$ |
54,661 |
|
|
$ |
66,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
Our geographic area information is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States |
|
Canada |
|
Germany |
|
Total |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
467,476 |
|
|
$ |
41,415 |
|
|
$ |
1,704 |
|
|
$ |
510,595 |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
519,047 |
|
|
$ |
52,441 |
|
|
$ |
1,963 |
|
|
$ |
573,451 |
|
Operating income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
82,616 |
|
|
$ |
2,650 |
|
|
$ |
298 |
|
|
$ |
85,564 |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
89,729 |
|
|
$ |
9,408 |
|
|
$ |
233 |
|
|
$ |
99,370 |
|
13. Supplementary Information
The detail of certain income statement accounts as presented in the unaudited condensed
consolidated statement of operations is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Merchandise revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
$ |
118,407 |
|
|
$ |
134,221 |
|
Cemetery |
|
|
91,861 |
|
|
|
108,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total merchandise revenues |
|
|
210,268 |
|
|
|
242,653 |
|
Services revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
|
234,713 |
|
|
|
259,511 |
|
Cemetery |
|
|
45,159 |
|
|
|
51,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total services revenues |
|
|
279,872 |
|
|
|
310,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenues |
|
|
20,455 |
|
|
|
20,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
510,595 |
|
|
$ |
573,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merchandise costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
$ |
62,003 |
|
|
$ |
68,663 |
|
Cemetery |
|
|
41,743 |
|
|
|
46,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of merchandise |
|
|
103,746 |
|
|
|
115,039 |
|
Services costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
|
103,483 |
|
|
|
112,057 |
|
Cemetery |
|
|
25,494 |
|
|
|
27,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of services |
|
|
128,977 |
|
|
|
139,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overhead and other expenses |
|
|
177,752 |
|
|
|
181,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
$ |
410,475 |
|
|
$ |
435,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. Commitments and Contingencies
Representations and Warranties
As of March 31, 2009, we have contingent obligations of $16.4 million (of which $8.4 million
is reflected in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as a liability) resulting
from our previous international asset sales and joint venture transactions. In some cases, we have
agreed to guarantee certain representations and warranties made in such divestiture transactions
with letters of credit or interest-bearing cash investments. We have interest-bearing cash
investments of $21.8 million included in Deferred charges and other assets collateralizing certain
of these contingent obligations. We believe it is remote that we will ultimately be required to
fund third-party claims against these representations and warranties above the carrying value of
the liability.
26
In 2004, we disposed of our funeral operations in France to a newly formed, third-party
company. As a result of this sale, we recognized certain Euro-denominated contractual obligations
related to representations, warranties, and other indemnifications. The remaining obligation
related to these indemnifications was 4.3 million, or $5.6 million at March 31, 2009.
During the first quarter of 2009, we released certain value-added tax (VAT) indemnifications
related to our former French operations as a result of the expiration of the statutory period of
limitations. In addition, we reduced the litigation provision as a result of favorable court
rulings. These transactions, after consideration of related foreign currency translation effects,
resulted in a $14.1 million reduction of the carrying value of our obligation. This reduction was
recorded in Gain (loss) on divestitures and impairment charges, net in the first quarter of 2009.
Litigation
We are a party to various litigation matters, investigations, and proceedings. For each of our
outstanding legal matters, we evaluate the merits of the case, our exposure to the matter, possible
legal or settlement strategies, and the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome. We intend to
vigorously defend ourselves in the lawsuits described herein; however, if we determine that an
unfavorable outcome is probable and can be reasonably estimated, we establish the necessary
accruals. We hold certain insurance policies that may reduce cash outflows with respect to an
adverse outcome of certain of these litigation matters. We accrue such insurance recoveries when
they become probable of being paid and can be reasonably estimated.
Conley Investment Counsel v. Service Corporation International, et al.; Civil Action
04-MD-1609; In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston
Division (the 2003 Securities Lawsuit). The 2003 Securities Lawsuit resulted from the transfer
and consolidation by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation of three lawsuits Edgar
Neufeld v. Service Corporation International, et al.; Cause No. CV-S-03-1561-HDM-PAL; in the United
States District Court for the District of Nevada; and Rujira Srisythemp v. Service Corporation
International, et al.; Cause No. CV-S-03-1392-LDG-LRL; in the United States District Court for the
District of Nevada; and Joshua Ackerman v. Service Corporation International, et al.; Cause No.
04-CV-20114; in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The 2003
Securities Lawsuit names as defendants SCI and several of SCIs current and former executive
officers or directors. The 2003 Securities Lawsuit is a purported class action alleging that the
defendants failed to disclose the unlawful treatment of human remains and burial sites at two
cemeteries in Fort Lauderdale and West Palm Beach, Florida. No discovery has occurred, and we
cannot quantify our ultimate liability, if any, for the payment of damages.
Burial Practices Claims. We are named as a defendant in various lawsuits alleging improper
burial practices at certain of our cemetery locations. These lawsuits include the Valls and Garcia
lawsuits described in the following paragraphs.
Maria Valls, Pedro Valls, and Roberto Valls, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly
situated v. SCI Funeral Services of Florida, Inc. d/b/a Memorial Plan a/k/a Flagler Memorial Park,
John Does and Jane Does ; Case No. 23693CA08; in the Circuit Court of the 11th Judicial Circuit in
and for Miami-Dade County, Florida (Valls Lawsuit). The Valls Lawsuit was filed December 5, 2005,
and named a subsidiary of SCI as a defendant. Plaintiffs have requested that the court certify this
matter as a class action. The plaintiffs allege the defendants improperly handled remains, did not
keep adequate records of interments, and engaged in various other improprieties in connection with
the operation of the cemetery. Although the plaintiffs seek to certify as a class all family
members of persons buried at the cemetery, the court has dismissed plaintiffs class action
allegations on two occasions; however, the dismissals were without prejudice. Plaintiffs filed a
third amended complaint and we again moved to dismiss the class action allegations. The court
dismissed the class allegations with prejudice, and the plaintiffs have appealed the ruling. The
appellate court has affirmed the dismissal of plaintiffs class action claims with prejudice. The
plaintiffs are seeking monetary damages and have reserved the right to seek leave from the court to
claim punitive damages. The plaintiffs are also seeking injunctive relief and we cannot quantify
our ultimate liability, if any, for the payment of any damages.
Reyvis Garcia and Alicia Garcia v. Alderwoods Group, Inc., Osiris Holding of Florida, Inc, a
Florida corporation, d/b/a Graceland Memorial Park South, f/k/a Paradise Memorial Gardens, Inc.,
was filed in December 2004, in the Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for
Miami-Dade County, Florida, Case No.: 04-25646 CA 32. Plaintiffs are the son and sister of the
decedent, Eloisa Garcia, who was buried at Graceland Memorial Park South in March 1986, when the
cemetery was owned by Paradise Memorial Gardens, Inc. Initially, the suit sought damages on the
individual claims of the plaintiffs relating to the burial of Eloisa Garcia. Plaintiffs claimed
that due to poor record keeping, spacing issues and maps, and the fact that the family could not
afford to purchase a marker for the grave, the burial location of the decedent could not be readily
located. Subsequently, the decedents grave was located and verified. In July 2006, plaintiffs
amended their complaint, seeking to certify a class of all persons buried at this
27
cemetery whose burial sites cannot be located, claiming that this was due to poor record keeping, maps, and
surveys at the cemetery. Plaintiffs subsequently filed a third amended class action complaint and
added two additional named plaintiffs. The plaintiffs are
seeking unspecified monetary damages, as well as equitable and injunctive relief. No class has
been certified in this matter. Since the action is in its preliminary stages, we cannot quantify
our ultimate liability, if any, for the payment of any damages.
Funeral Regulations Lawsuits. We are named as a defendant in various lawsuits alleging
violations of federal and state funeral related regulations and/or statutes, including the Sanchez
lawsuit described in the following paragraph.
Richard Sanchez et al v. Alderwoods Group, Inc. et al., was filed in February 2005 in the
Superior Court of the State of California, for the County of Los Angeles, Central District; Case
No. BC328962. Plaintiffs seek to certify a nationwide class on behalf of all consumers who
purchased funeral goods and services from Alderwoods. Plaintiffs allege in essence that the Federal
Trade Commissions Funeral Rule requires Alderwoods to disclose its markups on all items obtained
from third-parties in connection with funeral service contracts. Plaintiffs allege further that
Alderwoods has failed to make such disclosures. Plaintiffs seek to recover an unspecified amount of
monetary damages, attorneys fees, costs, and unspecified injunctive and declaratory relief. This
case is substantially similar to the lawsuit styled Mary Louise Baudino, et al. v. Service
Corporation International, et al., in which we prevailed as reported in our Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008. We expect that the outcome of this case will be governed by the law
applied in the Baudino lawsuit.
Antitrust Claims. We are named as a defendant in two related class action antitrust cases
filed in 2005. The first case is Cause No 4:05-CV-03394; Funeral Consumers Alliance, Inc. v.
Service Corporation International, et al.; in the United States District Court for the Southern
District of Texas Houston (Funeral Consumers Case). This is a purported class action on behalf
of casket consumers throughout the United States alleging that we and several other companies
involved in the funeral industry violated federal antitrust laws and state consumer laws by
engaging in various anti-competitive conduct associated with the sale of caskets.
The second case is Cause No. 4:05-CV-03399; Pioneer Valley Casket, et al. v. Service
Corporation International, et al.; in the United States District Court for the Southern District of
Texas Houston Division (Pioneer Valley Case). This lawsuit makes the same allegations as the
Funeral Consumers Case and is also brought against several other companies involved in the funeral
industry. Unlike the Funeral Consumers Case, the Pioneer Case is a purported class action on behalf
of all independent casket distributors that are in the business or were in the business any time
between July 18, 2001 to the present.
The Funeral Consumers Case and the Pioneer Valley Case seek injunctions, monetary damages, and
treble damages. The plaintiffs in the Funeral Consumers Case filed an expert report indicating that
the damages sought from all defendants range from approximately $950 million to $1.5 billion,
before trebling. Additionally, the plaintiffs in the Pioneer Valley Case filed an expert report
indicating that the damages sought from all defendants would be approximately $99 million, before
trebling. We deny that we engaged in anticompetitive practices related to our casket sales and
intend to vigorously contest these claims and plaintiffs damages reports. In both cases, we have
filed reports of our experts, which vigorously dispute the validity of the plaintiffs damages
theories and calculations. We cannot quantify our ultimate liability, if any, for the payment of
damages.
In November 2008, the Magistrate Judge issued recommendations that motions for class
certification be denied in both the Funeral Consumers Case and the Pioneer Valley Case. In March
2009, the District Court affirmed the Magistrate Judges recommendations and denied class
certification.
In April 2009, the District Court entered an agreed order dismissing the Pioneer Valley Case
with prejudice, thereby ending the case. The Funeral Consumers Case is pending appeal.
In addition to the Funeral Consumers Case and the Pioneer Valley Case, we received Civil
Investigative Demands, dated August 2005 and February 2006, from the Attorney General of Maryland
on behalf of itself and other state attorneys general, who have commenced an investigation of
alleged anticompetitive practices in the funeral industry. We have also received similar Civil
Investigative Demands from the Attorneys General of Florida and Connecticut.
Wage and Hour Claims. We are named a defendant in various lawsuits alleging violations of
federal and state laws regulating wage and hour overtime pay, including the Prise, Bryant, Bryant,
Stickle, and Welch lawsuits described in the following paragraphs.
28
Prise, et al., v. Alderwoods Group, Inc., and Service Corporation International; Cause No.
06-164; in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (the Wage and
Hour Lawsuit). The Wage and Hour Lawsuit was filed by two former Alderwoods (Pennsylvania), Inc.,
employees in December 2006 and purports to have been brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act
(FLSA) on behalf of all Alderwoods and SCI affiliated employees who performed work for which they
were not fully compensated, including work for which overtime pay was owed. The court has conditionally certified a class
of claims as to certain job positions for Alderwoods employees.
Plaintiffs allege causes of action for violations of the FLSA, failure to maintain proper
records, breach of contract, violations of state wage and hour laws, unjust enrichment, fraud and
deceit, quantum meruit, negligent misrepresentation, and negligence. Plaintiffs seek injunctive
relief, unpaid wages, liquidated, compensatory, consequential and punitive damages, attorneys fees
and costs, and pre- and post-judgment interest. We cannot quantify our ultimate liability, if any,
in this lawsuit.
Bryant, et al. v. Alderwoods Group, Inc., Service Corporation International, et al.; Case No.
3:07-CV-5696-SI; in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. This lawsuit
was filed on November 8, 2007 against SCI and various subsidiaries and individuals. It too is
related to the Wage and Hour Lawsuit, raising similar claims and brought by the same attorneys.
This lawsuit has been transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of
Pennsylvania and is now Case No. 08-CV-00891-JFC. We cannot quantify our ultimate liability, if
any, in this lawsuit.
Bryant, et al. v. Service Corporation International, et al.; Case No. RG-07359593; and Helm,
et al. v. AWGI & SCI; Case No. RG-07359602; In the Superior Court of the State of California,
County of Almeda. These cases were filed on December 5, 2007 by counsel for plaintiffs in the Wage
and Hour Lawsuit. These cases assert state law claims like those previously dismissed in the Wage
and Hour Lawsuit. These cases were removed to federal court in the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of California, San Francisco/Oakland Division. The Bryant case is now Case No.
3:08-CV-01190-SI and the Helm case is now Case No. 2:-CV-01184-SI. We cannot quantify our ultimate
liability, if any, in this lawsuit.
Stickle, et al. v. Service Corporation International, et al.; Case No. 08-CV-83; in the U.S.
District Court for Arizona, Phoenix Division. Counsel for plaintiffs in the Wage and Hour Lawsuit
filed this case on January 17, 2008, against SCI and various related entities and individuals
asserting FLSA and other ancillary claims based on the alleged failure to pay for overtime.
Plaintiffs seek the same class notice to SCI and related entities that were rejected by the Court
in the Wage and Hour Lawsuit. We cannot quantify our ultimate liability, if any, in this lawsuit.
Shauna Welch v. California Cemetery & Funeral Services, LLC; Case No. BC 396793; in the
Superior Court of the State of California, for the County of Los Angeles. In August 2008, the
plaintiff filed a class action on behalf of employees of a subsidiary in California for alleged
violations of the California Labor Code and the Business & Professions Code. The plaintiff
specifically alleges that she and the putative class are unable to negotiate their paychecks
without paying a fee and/or without being subject to a waiting period since paychecks are issued
from an out-of-state bank. We cannot quantify our ultimate liability, if any, in this lawsuit.
The ultimate outcome of the matters described above cannot be determined at this time. We
intend to vigorously defend all of the above lawsuits; however, an adverse decision in one or more
of such matters could have a material adverse effect on us, our financial condition, results of
operations, and cash flows.
15. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per common share (EPS) excludes dilution and is computed by dividing Net income
attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for
the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other
obligations to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the
issuance of common shares that then shared in our earnings.
A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted EPS computations
is presented below:
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per |
|
|
|
share amounts) |
|
Amounts attributable to common stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations basic |
|
$ |
34,530 |
|
|
$ |
41,504 |
|
After tax interest on convertible debt |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations diluted |
|
$ |
34,543 |
|
|
$ |
41,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
Net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income basic |
|
$ |
34,530 |
|
|
$ |
41,519 |
|
After tax interest on convertible debt |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income diluted |
|
$ |
34,543 |
|
|
$ |
41,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares basic |
|
|
250,134 |
|
|
|
261,475 |
|
Stock options |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
3,733 |
|
Convertible debt |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares diluted |
|
|
250,309 |
|
|
|
265,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
.14 |
|
|
$ |
.16 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
.14 |
|
|
$ |
.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
.14 |
|
|
$ |
.16 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
.14 |
|
|
$ |
.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The computation of diluted EPS excludes outstanding stock options and convertible debt in
certain periods in which the inclusion of such options and debt would be antidilutive in the
periods presented. Total options and convertible debentures not currently included in the
computation of dilutive EPS are as follows (in shares):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Antidilutive options |
|
|
12,102 |
|
|
|
920 |
|
Antidilutive convertible debentures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common stock equivalents
excluded from computation |
|
|
12,102 |
|
|
|
972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We adopted the provision of
FSP No. Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 03-6-1 Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-based
Payment Transactions are Participating Securities, on January 1, 2009.
Our adoption had no material impact on our reported EPS as reflected in these unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements.
16. Divestiture-Related Activities
As divestitures occur in the normal course of business, gains or losses on the sale of such
businesses are recognized in the income statement line item Gain (loss) on divestitures and
impairment charges, net. Additionally, as divestitures occur pursuant to our ongoing asset sale
programs, adjustments are made through this income statement line item to reflect the difference
between actual proceeds received from the sale compared to the original estimates.
30
Gain (loss) on divestitures and impairment charges, net consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Gain (loss) on divestitures, net |
|
$ |
10,865 |
|
|
$ |
(9,075 |
) |
Impairment losses |
|
|
(3,635 |
) |
|
|
(2,971 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,230 |
|
|
$ |
(12,046 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In
the first quarter of 2009, we recognized a $14.1 million gain due to the release of VAT
indemnifications and a reduction of certain litigation indemnifications related to our former French
operations. See Note 14 for further discussion of the indemnification liability.
Assets Held for Sale
Net assets held for sale were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
1,311 |
|
|
$ |
1,279 |
|
Preneed funeral receivables, net and trust investments |
|
|
3,854 |
|
|
|
3,099 |
|
Preneed cemetery receivables, net and trust investments |
|
|
47,691 |
|
|
|
49,985 |
|
Cemetery property |
|
|
10,970 |
|
|
|
11,047 |
|
Property and equipment, at cost |
|
|
1,566 |
|
|
|
1,386 |
|
Deferred charges and other assets |
|
|
11,522 |
|
|
|
11,748 |
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments |
|
|
20,520 |
|
|
|
20,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
97,434 |
|
|
|
98,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
Deferred preneed funeral revenues |
|
|
3,414 |
|
|
|
2,640 |
|
Deferred preneed cemetery revenues |
|
|
49,155 |
|
|
|
51,730 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
913 |
|
|
|
920 |
|
Care trusts corpus |
|
|
20,520 |
|
|
|
20,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
74,551 |
|
|
|
76,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets held for sale |
|
$ |
22,883 |
|
|
$ |
22,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The Company
We are North Americas leading provider of deathcare products and services, with a network of
funeral homes and cemeteries unequalled in geographic scale and reach. At March 31, 2009, we
operated 1,286 funeral service locations and 365 cemeteries (including 207 combination locations)
in North America, which are geographically diversified across 43 states, eight Canadian provinces,
the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Our funeral segment also includes the operations of 12
funeral homes in Germany that we intend to exit when economic values and conditions are conducive
to a sale. Our funeral service and cemetery operations consist of funeral service locations,
cemeteries, funeral service/cemetery combination locations, crematoria, and related businesses. We
sell cemetery property and funeral and cemetery products and services at the time of need and on a
preneed basis.
We currently have approximately $123.4 million authorized to repurchase our common stock. Our
financial stability is further enhanced by our $6.3 billion backlog of future revenues from both
trust and insurance-funded sales at March 31, 2009, which is the result of preneed funeral and
cemetery sales. We believe we have the financial strength and flexibility to reward shareholders
through dividends while maintaining a prudent capital structure and pursuing new opportunities for
profitable growth.
31
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
Recent Volatility in Financial Markets
The weakened economy has negatively impacted our cemetery property sales. In the first quarter
of 2009, preneed and atneed cemetery property production declined 16.3%, which significantly
decreased our cemetery revenue. See Item 1A of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008 for further discussion of risks presented by the weakening economy.
Our funeral, cemetery merchandise and service, and cemetery perpetual care trusts have been
and continue to be impacted by adverse conditions in the U.S. and global financial markets. The
fair market value of our trust investments declined sharply in the second half of 2008. In the
first quarter of 2009, we realized aggregate net losses of $40.8 million in our preneed funeral and
cemetery merchandise and service trusts. In addition, we realized aggregate net losses of $10.7
million in our cemetery perpetual care trusts.
As of March 31, 2009, we have net unrealized losses of $500.8 million in our preneed funeral
and cemetery merchandise and service trusts, and net unrealized losses of $189.3 million in our
cemetery perpetual care trusts, as discussed in Notes 4, 5, and 6 in Part I, Item 1, Financial
Statements. At March 31, 2009, these net unrealized losses represented 26% of our original cost
basis of $2.7 billion. As explained in Critical Accounting Policies, Fair Value Measurements in
our 2008 annual report on Form 10-K, changes in unrealized gains and/or losses related to these
securities are reflected in Other comprehensive income (loss) and offset by the Deferred preneed
funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust and Care trusts corpus interests in those unrealized
gains and/or losses. Therefore, the majority of these significant net unrealized losses are not
reflected in our consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009. We
do, however, rely on our trust investments to provide funding for the various contractual
obligations that arise upon maturity of the underlying preneed contracts. Because of the long-term
relationship between the establishment of trust investments and the required performance of the
underlying contractual obligations, the impact of current market conditions that may exist at any
given time is not necessarily indicative of our ability to generate profit on our future
performance obligations.
Trust Investments
In addition to selling our products and services to client families at the time of need, we
sell price-guaranteed preneed funeral and cemetery contracts, which provide for future funeral or
cemetery services and merchandise. Since preneed funeral and cemetery services or merchandise will
not be provided until sometime in the future, most states and provinces require that all or a
portion of the funds collected from customers on preneed funeral and cemetery contracts be paid
into trusts until the merchandise is delivered or the service is performed. Investment earnings
associated with the trust investments are expected to mitigate the inflationary costs of providing
the preneed funeral and cemetery services and merchandise in the future for the prices that were
guaranteed at the time of sale.
Also, we are required by state or provincial law to pay a portion of the proceeds from the
sale of cemetery property interment rights into perpetual care trusts. For these investments, the
original corpus remains in the trust in perpetuity and the net ordinary earnings are intended to
offset the expense to maintain the cemetery property. The majority of states require that net
gains or losses are retained and added to the corpus, but certain states allow the net realized
gains and losses to be included in the income that is distributed.
Independent trustees manage and
invest all of the funds deposited into the funeral and cemetery merchandise and service trusts as well as
the cemetery perpetual care trusts. The trustees are selected based on their respective geographic
footprint and qualifications per state regulations. All of the trustees engage the same independent
investment advisor. The investment guidelines are governed by state and provincial legislation. The
trustees, with input from the investment advisor, establish an investment policy
that serves as an operating document to guide the investment activities of the trusts including asset
allocation and manager selection. Asset allocation is based on legislative guidelines and matched to the liability
structure of each trust.
The investment advisor recommends investment
managers to the trustees that are selected on the basis of various criteria set
forth in the investment policy. The primary investment objectives for the funeral and cemetery merchandise
and service trusts include (1) achieving growth of principal over time sufficient to
preserve and increase the purchasing power of the assets; (2) producing current income
to support the specific objectives of each trust type; and (3) preserving capital within acceptable levels
of volatility. Preneed funeral and cemetery contracts generally take years to mature. Therefore,
the funds associated with these contracts are often invested for several market cycles. While cemetery perpetual
care trusts share the same investment objectives as listed above, these trusts
emphasize providing a steady stream of investment income with some capital appreciation. The trusts seek
to minimize volatility through a combination of asset class, manager and security level diversification.
32
The market values of our trust investments at March 31, 2009 are detailed below (in
thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Funeral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral |
|
|
Cemetery |
|
|
and Cemetery |
|
|
Cemetery |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merchandise |
|
|
Merchandise |
|
|
Merchandise |
|
|
Perpetual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Service |
|
|
and Service |
|
|
and Service |
|
|
Care Funds |
|
|
Total |
|
Fixed income securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury |
|
$ |
51,549 |
|
|
$ |
48,317 |
|
|
$ |
99,866 |
|
|
$ |
7,037 |
|
|
$ |
106,903 |
|
Canadian government |
|
|
95,913 |
|
|
|
11,451 |
|
|
|
107,364 |
|
|
|
22,501 |
|
|
|
129,865 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
22,238 |
|
|
|
8,258 |
|
|
|
30,496 |
|
|
|
37,110 |
|
|
|
67,606 |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
18,478 |
|
|
|
14,434 |
|
|
|
32,912 |
|
|
|
3,207 |
|
|
|
36,119 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
Equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,510 |
|
|
|
5,510 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
252,767 |
|
|
|
332,235 |
|
|
|
585,002 |
|
|
|
75,543 |
|
|
|
660,545 |
|
Mutual funds: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
64,615 |
|
|
|
133,926 |
|
|
|
198,541 |
|
|
|
63,941 |
|
|
|
262,482 |
|
Fixed income |
|
|
129,048 |
|
|
|
152,538 |
|
|
|
281,586 |
|
|
|
400,152 |
|
|
|
681,738 |
|
Private equity |
|
|
11,083 |
|
|
|
4,064 |
|
|
|
15,147 |
|
|
|
9,727 |
|
|
|
24,874 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,905 |
|
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
2,819 |
|
|
|
5,962 |
|
|
|
8,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
647,618 |
|
|
|
706,137 |
|
|
|
1,353,755 |
|
|
|
630,690 |
|
|
|
1,984,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets associated with business held for sale |
|
|
(3,538 |
) |
|
|
(42,524 |
) |
|
|
(46,062 |
) |
|
|
(20,520 |
) |
|
|
(66,582 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
127,593 |
|
|
|
159,568 |
|
|
|
287,161 |
|
|
|
87,365 |
|
|
|
374,526 |
|
Insurance-backed fixed income securities |
|
|
208,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trust assets |
|
|
980,385 |
|
|
|
823,181 |
|
|
|
1,803,566 |
|
|
|
697,535 |
|
|
|
2,501,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of the end of the quarter,
95% of our trusts were under the control and custody of four
preferred trustees. The three large U.S. trustees primarily use Common Trust Fund structures as
the investment vehicle for their trusts. Through the Common Trust Fund structure, each respective
trustee manages the allocation of assets through individual managed accounts or institutional
mutual funds. In the event a particular state prohibits the use of a Common Trust Fund as a
qualified investment, the trustee utilizes institutional mutual funds. The U.S. trusts include
a modest allocation to Alternative Investments, which are comprised primarily of Private Equity and Real Estate investments. These
investments are structured as Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) and
are managed by trustees. The trusts
that are eligible to allocate a portion of their investments to Alternative Investments purchase
units of the respective LLCs.
Fixed Income Securities
Fixed income investments are
intended to preserve principal, provide a source of current income,
and reduce overall portfolio volatility. The SCI trusts have
direct investments primarily in government fixed income securities.
Canadian government fixed income securities are investments in Canadian federal and provincial government
instruments. In many cases, regulatory restrictions mandate that the funds from the sales of
preneed funeral and cemetery products sold in certain Canadian jurisdictions must be invested in
these instruments.
Equity Securities
Equity investments have
historically provided long-term capital appreciation in excess of inflation. The SCI trusts
have direct investments primarily in domestic equity portfolios that include large, mid and small capitalization
companies of different investment styles (i.e., growth, value, etc.). The majority of the equity portfolio is
managed by multiple institutional investment managers that specialize in a style-specific area of expertise.
Our equity securities are exposed to market risk; however, these securities are well diversified.
As of March 31, 2009, the largest single equity position represented less than 1% of the total equity securities portfolio.
33
Mutual Funds
The SCI trust funds employ
institutional mutual funds where operationally or economically efficient. Institutional mutual funds are utilized to invest
in various asset classes including US equities, non-US equities, convertible bonds, corporate bonds, government bonds, Treasury
Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS), high yield bonds, Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), and
commodities. The mutual funds are governed by guidelines outlined in their individual prospectuses.
Private Equity
The objective of these investments
is to provide high rates of return with controlled volatility. These investments are typically long-term
in duration. These investments are diversified by strategy, sector, manager, and vintage year.
Private equity exposure is accessed through limited liability companies (LLCs) established by certain
preferred trustees. These two LLCs invest into numerous Limited Partnerships, including Private Equity,
Fund of Funds, Distressed Debt, Real Estate and Mezzanine financing. The trustees that have
oversight of their respective LLCs work closely with the investment advisor in making all current investments.
Outlook for Trust Investments
The trust fund income recognized from
these investment assets continues to be volatile. During the recent economic
downturn, the SCI trusts outperformed the broad market due to their diversified investment strategy.
During the twelve months ended March 31, 2009, the Standards and Poors 500 index decreased approximately 38%
and the combined SCI trusts decreased approximately 22%. As the capital markets begin to improve, the SCI
trusts should participate in the recovery.
SCI, its trustees and the
investment advisor continue to monitor the capital markets and the trusts on an
ongoing basis. The trustees, with input from the investment advisor, will take prudent action as
needed to achieve the investment goals and objectives of the trusts.
Capital Allocation Considerations
We rely on cash flow from operations as a significant source of liquidity. Our cash flow from
operating activities provided $141.4 million in the first quarter of 2009. Our current cash and
cash equivalents balance is approximately $125 million as of April 30, 2009. In addition, we have
approximately $202.3 million in excess borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility.
Our bank credit facility requires us to maintain certain leverage and interest coverage
ratios. As of March 31, 2009, we were in compliance with all of our debt covenants. Our financial
covenant requirements and actual ratios as of March 31, 2009 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per credit |
|
|
|
|
agreement |
|
Actual |
Leverage ratio |
|
4.25 (Max) |
|
|
3.60 |
|
Interest coverage ratio |
|
2.50 (Min) |
|
|
3.60 |
|
Our financial covenant requirements per our agreement become more restrictive over time. The
future leverage and interest coverage ratios are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leverage ratio (max) |
2009 |
|
|
4.25 |
|
2010 |
|
|
3.75 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
3.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest coverage ratio (min) |
2009 thru June 2010 |
|
|
2.75 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
3.00 |
|
34
We currently have no significant maturities of long-term debt until November 2011. We believe
these sources of liquidity can be supplemented by our ability to access the capital markets for
additional debt or equity securities. However, given the current environment, interest rates on
borrowings are significantly higher than levels experienced in recent history. We believe that our
cash on hand, future operating cash flows, and the available capacity under our credit facility
will be adequate to meet our financial obligations over the next 12 months.
Cash Flow
We believe our ability to generate strong operating cash flow is one of our fundamental
financial strengths and provides us with substantial flexibility in meeting operating and investing
needs. Set forth below is a reconciliation of net cash provided by operating activities excluding
special items to our reported net cash provided by operating activities prepared in accordance with
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). We believe this non-GAAP financial measure
provides a consistent basis for comparison between periods and better reflects the performance of
our core operations. We do not intend for this information to be considered in isolation or as a
substitute for other measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities, as reported |
|
$ |
141.4 |
|
|
$ |
46.3 |
|
One-time Alderwoods transition and other costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
United States Federal transaction-related tax payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
90.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities, excluding special items |
|
$ |
141.4 |
|
|
$ |
139.6 |
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities, excluding special items, increased approximately
$1.8 million in the first quarter of 2009 compared to the first
quarter of 2008. We did experience declines in atneed customer cash
receipts in both the funeral and cemetery segments related to the
decrease in the number of deaths in our markets. However, customer
collection rates related to our funeral and cemetery preneed
contracts were strong. These preneed cash collections, coupled with a $28.2
million decrease in incentive compensation payments, a decrease in payroll cost of $9.5 million,
and $8.0 million of lower variable merchandise costs resulted in
operating cash flows that were in line with our expectations.
Investing Activities Net cash used in investing activities decreased $29.6 million in the
first three months of 2009 compared to the first three months of 2008, primarily due to a $21.6
million decrease in deposits of restricted funds and a decrease of $5.7 million in capital
expenditures.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities increased by $2.1 million in the
first three months of 2009 compared to the first three months of
2008, primarily due to net debt cash inflows in 2008, partially offset by share repurchases in 2008.
Financial Assurances
In support of our operations, we have entered into arrangements with certain surety companies
whereby such companies agree to issue surety bonds on our behalf as financial assurance and/or as
required by existing state and local regulations. The surety bonds are used for various business
purposes; however, the majority of the surety bonds issued and outstanding have been used to
support our preneed funeral and cemetery sales activities. The obligations underlying these surety
bonds are recorded on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as Deferred preneed
funeral revenues and Deferred preneed cemetery revenues. The breakdown of surety bonds between
funeral and cemetery preneed arrangements, as well as surety bonds for other activities, is
described below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Preneed funeral |
|
$ |
126.8 |
|
|
$ |
130.6 |
|
Preneed cemetery: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merchandise and service |
|
|
126.5 |
|
|
|
132.4 |
|
Pre-construction |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds supporting preneed funeral and cemetery obligations |
|
|
256.2 |
|
|
|
265.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds supporting preneed business permits |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
Other bonds |
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total surety bonds outstanding |
|
$ |
279.4 |
|
|
$ |
288.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
When selling preneed funeral and cemetery contracts, we may post surety bonds where allowed by
state law. We post the surety bonds in lieu of trusting a certain amount of funds received from the
customer. The amount of the bond posted is generally determined by the total amount of the preneed
contract that would otherwise be required to be trusted, in accordance with applicable state law.
For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, we had $6.3 million and $7.9 million,
respectively, of cash receipts attributable to bonded sales. These amounts do not consider
reductions associated with taxes, obtaining costs, or other costs.
Surety bond premiums are paid annually and are automatically renewable until maturity of the
underlying preneed contracts, unless we are given prior notice of cancellation. Except for cemetery
pre-construction bonds (which are irrevocable), the surety companies generally have the right to
cancel the surety bonds at any time with appropriate notice. In the event a surety company were to
cancel the surety bond, we are required to obtain replacement surety assurance from another surety
company or fund a trust for an amount generally less than the posted bond amount. Management does
not expect that we will be required to fund material future amounts related to these surety bonds
because of lack of surety capacity or surety company non-performance.
Preneed Funeral and Cemetery Activities and Backlog of Contracts
Since preneed funeral and cemetery services or merchandise will not be provided until sometime
in the future, most states and provinces require that all or a portion of the funds collected from
customers on preneed funeral and cemetery contracts be paid into merchandise and service trusts
until the merchandise is delivered or the service is performed. These trust funds own investments
in equity and debt securities and mutual funds, which are sensitive to current market prices. In
certain situations, as described above, where permitted by state or provincial laws, we post a
surety bond as financial assurance for a certain amount of the preneed funeral or cemetery contract
in lieu of placing funds into trust accounts.
The tables below detail our results of preneed funeral and cemetery production and maturities,
excluding insurance contracts, for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Funeral: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed trust-funded (including bonded): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production |
|
$ |
38.2 |
|
|
$ |
37.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production (number of contracts) |
|
|
7,336 |
|
|
|
7,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities |
|
$ |
45.8 |
|
|
$ |
56.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities (number of contracts) |
|
|
11,558 |
|
|
|
12,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cemetery: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed |
|
$ |
81.0 |
|
|
$ |
90.0 |
|
Atneed |
|
|
59.7 |
|
|
|
67.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales production |
|
$ |
140.7 |
|
|
$ |
157.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production deferred to backlog: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed |
|
$ |
33.2 |
|
|
$ |
34.6 |
|
Atneed |
|
|
46.4 |
|
|
|
51.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales production deferred to backlog |
|
$ |
79.6 |
|
|
$ |
85.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue recognized from backlog: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed |
|
$ |
30.6 |
|
|
$ |
30.1 |
|
Atneed |
|
|
45.3 |
|
|
|
48.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue recognized from backlog |
|
$ |
75.9 |
|
|
$ |
78.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
Insurance-Funded Preneed Funeral Contracts: Where permitted by state or provincial law,
customers may arrange their preneed funeral contract by purchasing a life insurance or annuity
policy from third-party insurance companies, for which we earn a commission as general sales agent
for the insurance company. The policy amount of the insurance contract between the customer and the
third-party insurance company generally equals the amount of the preneed funeral contract. We do
not reflect the unfulfilled insurance-funded preneed funeral contract amounts in our unaudited
condensed consolidated balance sheet.
The table below details the results of insurance-funded preneed funeral production and
maturities for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, and the number of contracts
associated with those transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Preneed funeral insurance-funded (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production |
|
$ |
69.6 |
|
|
$ |
68.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales production (number of contracts) |
|
|
11,959 |
|
|
|
11,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General agency revenue |
|
$ |
11.8 |
|
|
$ |
11.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities |
|
$ |
65.0 |
|
|
$ |
67.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities (number of contracts) |
|
|
12,071 |
|
|
|
13,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts are not included in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet. |
Backlog of Preneed Funeral and Cemetery Contracts: The following table reflects our backlog of
trust-funded deferred preneed funeral and cemetery contract revenues, including amounts related to
Deferred preneed funeral and cemetery receipts held in trust, as of March 31, 2009.
Additionally, the table reflects our backlog of unfulfilled insurance-funded contracts (which
are not included in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet) at March 31, 2009.
The backlog amounts presented are reduced by an amount that we believe will
cancel before maturity based on historical experience.
The table also reflects our preneed funeral and cemetery receivables and trust investments
(market and cost bases) associated with the backlog of deferred preneed funeral and cemetery
contract revenues, net of the estimated cancellation allowance. We believe that the table below is
meaningful because it sets forth the aggregate amount of future revenues we expect to recognize as
a result of preneed sales, as well as the amount of assets associated with those revenues. Because
the future revenues exceed the asset amounts, future revenues will exceed the cash distributions
actually received from the associated trusts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Market |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
|
(Dollars in billions) |
Deferred preneed funeral revenues |
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
Deferred preneed funeral receipts held in trust |
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.59 |
|
|
$ |
1.79 |
|
Allowance for cancellation on trust investments |
|
|
(0.11 |
) |
|
|
(0.11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog of trust-funded deferred preneed funeral revenues |
|
$ |
1.48 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
Backlog of insurance-funded preneed funeral revenues |
|
|
3.35 |
|
|
|
3.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total backlog of preneed funeral revenues |
|
$ |
4.83 |
|
|
$ |
5.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments |
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
|
$ |
1.39 |
|
Allowance for cancellation on trust investments |
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets associated with backlog of trust-funded deferred preneed
funeral revenues, net of estimated allowance for cancellation |
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
Insurance policies associated with insurance-funded deferred
preneed funeral revenues, net of estimated allowance for
cancellation |
|
|
3.35 |
|
|
|
3.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets associated with backlog of preneed funeral revenues |
|
$ |
4.45 |
|
|
$ |
4.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred preneed cemetery revenues |
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
Deferred preneed cemetery receipts held in trust |
|
|
0.85 |
|
|
|
1.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.65 |
|
|
$ |
1.95 |
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Market |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
|
(Dollars in billions) |
Allowance for cancellation on trust investments |
|
|
(0.16 |
) |
|
|
(0.16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog of deferred cemetery revenues |
|
$ |
1.49 |
|
|
$ |
1.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments |
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
|
$ |
1.39 |
|
Allowance for cancellation on trust investments |
|
|
(0.11 |
) |
|
|
(0.11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets associated with backlog of deferred cemetery revenues,
net of estimated allowance for cancellation |
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
|
$ |
1.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The difference between the backlog and asset amounts represents the contracts for which we
have posted surety bonds as financial assurance in lieu of trusting, the amounts collected from
customers that were not required to be deposited into trust, and allowable cash distributions from
trust assets. The table also reflects the amounts expected to be received from insurance companies
through the assignment of policy proceeds related to insurance-funded funeral contracts.
Results of Operations Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
Management Summary
Key highlights in the first quarter of 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
Funeral gross profit decreased $24.3 million or 22.4% as revenue declines driven by
decreases in funeral services performed and trust fund income were partially offset by
lower variable costs; |
|
|
|
|
Cemetery gross profit decreased $13.2 million due to a decline in preneed cemetery
property sales and lower trust fund income, partially offset by lower variable costs; and |
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations of $.14 in the first quarter of
2009 declined $.02 from the first quarter of 2008. |
Results of Operations
In the first quarter of 2009, we reported net income attributable to common stockholders of $34.5 million ($.14 per diluted share)
compared to net income in the first quarter of 2008 of $41.5 million ($.16 per diluted share).
These results were impacted by the following items:
|
|
|
a net after-tax gain on asset sales of $2.6 million in the first quarter of 2009,
primarily due to the release of certain indemnification liabilities related to our
former French operations, as compared to an after-tax loss on asset sales of $9.6 million in
the first quarter of 2008; |
|
|
|
|
an after-tax gain from the early extinguishment of debt of $1.0 million in the first
quarter of 2009; and |
|
|
|
|
an after-tax expense related to our acquisition and integration of Alderwoods of $0.7 million in the first quarter of 2008.
|
Consolidated Versus Comparable Results
The table below reconciles our consolidated GAAP results to our comparable, or same store,
results for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. We define comparable operations (or
same store operations) as those funeral and cemetery locations that were owned for the entire
period beginning January 1, 2008 and ending March 31, 2009. The following tables present operating
results for funeral and cemetery locations that were owned by us during this period.
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results Associated |
|
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
with Acquisition/ |
|
|
Results Associated |
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
New Construction |
|
|
with Divestitures |
|
|
Comparable |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
North America Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue |
|
$ |
363.2 |
|
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
$ |
357.5 |
|
Cemetery revenue |
|
|
145.7 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
143.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
508.9 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
501.1 |
|
Germany revenue |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
510.6 |
|
|
$ |
6.4 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
502.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America Gross Profits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits |
|
$ |
84.0 |
|
|
$ |
(0.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
$ |
85.7 |
|
Cemetery gross profits |
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.8 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
101.0 |
|
Germany gross profits |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profits |
|
|
100.1 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
101.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Results Associated |
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
with Divestitures |
|
|
Comparable |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
North America Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral revenue |
|
$ |
403.6 |
|
|
$ |
4.8 |
|
|
$ |
398.8 |
|
Cemetery revenue |
|
|
167.9 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
167.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
571.5 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
565.8 |
|
Germany revenue |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
573.5 |
|
|
$ |
5.7 |
|
|
$ |
567.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America Gross Profits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funeral gross profits |
|
$ |
108.4 |
|
|
$ |
(0.1 |
) |
|
$ |
108.5 |
|
Cemetery gross profits |
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
29.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137.4 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
137.6 |
|
Germany gross profits |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profits |
|
$ |
137.6 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
$ |
137.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
The following table provides the data necessary to calculate our consolidated average revenue
per funeral service for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. We calculate average
revenue per funeral service by dividing consolidated funeral revenue, excluding General Agency (GA)
revenues and certain other revenues to avoid distorting our averages of normal funeral services
revenue, by the number of consolidated funeral services performed during the period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except |
|
|
|
average revenue per funeral |
|
|
|
service) |
|
Consolidated funeral revenue |
|
$ |
364.9 |
|
|
$ |
405.6 |
|
Less: Consolidated GA revenue |
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
Less: Other revenue |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted consolidated funeral revenue |
|
$ |
351.3 |
|
|
$ |
391.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated funeral services performed |
|
|
69,329 |
|
|
|
77,386 |
|
Consolidated average revenue per funeral service |
|
$ |
5,067 |
|
|
$ |
5,063 |
|
The following table provides the data necessary to calculate our comparable average revenue
per funeral service for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. We calculate average
revenue per funeral service by dividing comparable funeral revenue, excluding comparable GA
revenues and certain other revenues to avoid distorting our averages of normal funeral services
revenue, by the number of comparable funeral services performed during the period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions, |
|
|
|
except average |
|
|
|
revenue per funeral service) |
|
Comparable funeral revenue |
|
$ |
359.2 |
|
|
$ |
400.8 |
|
Less: Comparable GA revenue |
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
Less: Other revenue |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted comparable funeral revenue |
|
$ |
345.7 |
|
|
$ |
386.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparable funeral services performed |
|
|
67,851 |
|
|
|
76,445 |
|
Comparable average revenue per funeral service |
|
$ |
5,095 |
|
|
$ |
5,061 |
|
Funeral Results
Funeral Revenue
Consolidated revenues from funeral operations were $364.9 million in the first quarter of 2009
compared to $405.6 million in the same period in 2008. This decrease is due to a 10.4% decline in
funeral services performed, an unfavorable Canadian currency impact of $8.1 million, and
$5.3 million in decreased trust fund income.
Funeral Services Performed
Our consolidated funeral services performed decreased 10.4% in the first quarter of 2009
compared to the same period in 2008. Our comparable funeral services performed decreased 11.2% in
the first quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. We believe the decline in deaths
in our markets is
consistent with trends experienced by other funeral service providers
and industry vendors and was due in part
to a relatively mild influenza season compared to the
first quarter of 2008 and an additional day due to a leap year in the prior year quarter. Our
comparable cremation rate of 42.9% in the first quarter of 2009 increased from 41.0% in 2008, which
resulted in lower revenues of approximately $4.7 million, or $70 per funeral service.
Average Revenue Per Funeral
Our consolidated average revenue per funeral service increased $4, or 0.1% in the
first quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. Our comparable average revenue per
funeral service increased $34, or 0.7%, in the first quarter of 2009 over the same period in 2008.
Excluding an unfavorable Canadian currency impact of $8.1 million and
decreased trust fund income, the comparable average revenue grew approximately 4%.
40
Funeral Gross Profit
Consolidated funeral gross profits decreased $24.3 million in the first quarter of 2009
compared to same period in 2008. The consolidated gross margin
percentage decreased to 23.1% from 26.8%. Comparable funeral gross profits decreased $22.7 million, or
20.9% when compared to the same period in 2008. This decrease is due to the impact of lower funeral services performed and a decrease in funeral trust fund income
which were partially offset by lower variable
merchandise costs and a decline in personnel costs related to work force initiatives.
Cemetery Results
Cemetery Revenue
Consolidated revenues from our cemetery operations decreased $22.2 million, or 13.2%, in the
first quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. Comparable cemetery revenues declined
$23.4 million, or 14.0%, when compared with the same period in 2008. This decrease was primarily
driven by a $10.5 million decline in
comparable recognized preneed revenues which was in line with our expectations and continued to be impacted by
negative consumer sentiment resulting from the difficult economic environment. Other revenue decreased $6.2 million
as cemetery trust fund income recognized from our preneed merchandise and service trusts declined $5.5 million due to negative
market returns experienced in late 2008 and early 2009.
Cemetery Gross Profits
Consolidated cemetery gross profit decreased $13.2 million, or 45.5%, in the first quarter of
2009 compared to the same period in 2008. Our consolidated cemetery gross margin percentage was 10.8%
compared to 17.3% in the same period in 2008. These decreases reflect the revenue declines
discussed above, which were partially offset by lower variable selling compensation expenses and a decline in
personnel costs related to work force initiatives. The cemetery gross profit in the quarter exceeded
our expectations as cost control initiatives helped to offset lower-than-expected atneed
revenues due to a reduced number of deaths in our markets.
Other Financial Statement Items
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses were $21.8 million in the first quarter of 2009 compared
to $25.1 million in the first quarter of 2008 primarily due to
lower incentive compensation expense.
Gain (loss) on Divestitures and Impairment Charges, net
We recognized a $7.2 million net pre-tax gain on divestitures and impairment in the first
quarter of 2009. This gain was due to the release of VAT and litigation indemnifications related to
our former French operations of $14.1 million, partially offset by losses from impairment charges
and asset divestitures. In the first quarter of 2008, we recognized a $12.0 million net pretax loss
from impairment charges and asset divestitures primarily associated with non-strategic funeral and
cemetery businesses in the United States and Canada.
Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased to $31.7 million in the first quarter of 2009, compared to $34.1
million in the first quarter of 2008. The decrease was primarily attributable to the $45.2 million
payment of our 6.50% Notes due March 2008 and a decrease in rates associated with our floating rate debt.
Gain on Early Extinguishment of Debt
During
2009, we repaid $9.3 million of our 6.75% Notes due April 2015 and 7.00%
Notes due June 2017. As a result of these transactions, we recognized a gain of $1.6 million, which
represents the write-off of unamortized deferred loan costs of $0.2 million and a $1.8 million
discount to early extinguish the debt.
41
Other Expense, Net
Other expense, net was $1.5 million in the first quarter of 2009 compared to $0.7 million in
the first quarter of 2008 primarily due to a $0.8 million increase in foreign exchange loss in 2009
compared to 2008 as a result of the decline in Canadian and Euro currencies.
Provision for Income Taxes
The income tax rate was 37.1% in the first quarter of 2009 as compared to 37.6% in the first
quarter of 2008.
Weighted Average Shares
The diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding was 250.3 million in the first
quarter of 2009, compared to 265.3 million in the first quarter of 2008, reflecting share
repurchases under our Board-approved share repurchase program.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
amounts reported in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying
notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Except as described below, our critical accounting policies are
disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Noncontrolling Interests
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS 160), which establishes accounting and
reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of
a subsidiary. SFAS 160 clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary, which is sometimes
referred to as an unconsolidated investment, is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity
that should be reported as a component of equity in the consolidated financial statements. Among
other requirements, SFAS 160 requires consolidated net income to be reported at amounts
attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest. It also requires disclosure, on
the face of the consolidated income statement, of the amounts of consolidated net income
attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest. We adopted the provisions of SFAS
160 on January 1, 2009. As a result, we have modified our condensed consolidated statement of
operations, condensed consolidated balance sheet, condensed consolidated statement of cash flows,
and condensed consolidated statement of stockholders equity to incorporate the required
disclosure of noncontrolling interest information as required by SFAS 160.
During our examination
of SFAS 160 and its impact on our current accounting, we determined that balances historically designated as non-controlling
interest in our consolidated preneed funeral and cemetery trusts and our cemetery perpetual care trusts
do not meet the criteria for non-controlling interest as prescribed by SFAS 160. SFAS 160 indicates that only a
financial instrument classified as equity in the trusts financial statements can be a non-controlling interest
in the consolidated financial statements. The interest related to our merchandise and service trusts is classified as a liability because
the preneed contracts underlying these trusts are unconditionally redeemable upon the occurrence of
an event that is certain to occur. In addition, since the earnings
from our cemetery perpetual care trusts are used to support the maintenance of our cemeteries, the interest
in these trusts also retains the characteristics of a liability.
Accordingly, effective December 31, 2008, we re-characterized the amounts
historically described as Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts as either Deferred preneed funeral revenues held in trust or
Deferred preneed cemetery revenues held in trust,
as appropriate. Additionally we re-characterized the amounts historically described as
Non-controlling interest in cemetery perpetual care trusts as Care Trusts Corpus
Fair Value Measurements
We
measure the available-for-sale securities held by our funeral merchandise and service,
cemetery merchandise and service, and cemetery perpetual care trusts at fair value on a recurring
basis in accordance with SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157).
SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about instruments
measured at fair value. SFAS 157 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of
fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the
valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as
follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for
identical assets or liabilities in active markets; |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets
or liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or
liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial
instrument; |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the
fair value measurement. |
An assets or liabilitys categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the
lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Certain available-for-sale
securities held by our funeral merchandise and service, cemetery merchandise and service, and
cemetery perpetual care trusts have been classified in Level 3 of the SFAS 157 hierarchy due to
significant management judgment required as a result of the absence of quoted market prices,
inherent lack of liquidity, or the long-term nature of the securities. For additional disclosures
required by SFAS 157 for all of our available-for-sale securities, see Notes 4, 5, and 6.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No.
157 (FSP 157-2). FSP FAS 157-2 provided a one-year deferral of the effective date of SFAS 157 for
non-financial assets and liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed in the
financial statements at fair value at least annually. In accordance with FSP 157-2, we adopted the
provisions of FAS 157 for our non-financial assets and liabilities, such as goodwill and property
and equipment, that we disclose or recognize at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of January 1,
2009. As none of our non-financial assets or liabilities within the scope of FAS 157 experienced an
event that required fair value measurement in the first quarter of 2009, our adoption of FAS 157
for these assets and liabilities had no impact on our results of operations, consolidated financial
position, or cash flows.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Accounting Changes
For discussion of recent accounting pronouncements and accounting changes, see Part I, Item 1.
Financial Statements, Note 3.
Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Statements
The statements in this Form 10-Q that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements
made in reliance on the safe harbor protections provided under the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be accompanied by words such as believe, estimate,
project, expect, anticipate, or predict, that convey the uncertainty of future events or
outcomes. These statements are based on assumptions that we believe are reasonable; however, many
important factors could cause our actual results in the future to differ materially from the
forward-looking statements made herein and in any other documents or oral presentations made by us,
or on our behalf. Important factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially from
those in forward-looking statements include, among others, the following:
|
|
Changes in general economic conditions, both domestically and internationally, impacting
financial markets (e.g., marketable security values, access to capital markets, as well as
currency and interest rate fluctuations) that could negatively affect us, particularly, but
not limited to, levels of trust fund income, interest expense, and negative currency
translation effects. |
42
|
|
Changes in operating conditions such as supply disruptions and labor disputes. |
|
|
|
Our inability to achieve the level of cost savings, productivity improvements or earnings
growth anticipated by management, whether due to significant increases in energy costs (e.g.,
electricity, natural gas, and fuel oil), costs of other materials, employee-related costs or
other factors. |
|
|
|
Inability to complete acquisitions, divestitures or strategic alliances as planned or to
realize expected synergies and strategic benefits. |
|
|
|
The outcomes of pending lawsuits, proceedings, and claims against us and the possibility that
insurance coverage is deemed not to apply to these matters or that an insurance carrier is
unable to pay any covered amounts to us. |
|
|
|
Allegations regarding compliance with laws, regulations, industry standards, and customs
regarding funeral or burial procedures and practices. |
|
|
|
The amounts payable by us with respect to our outstanding legal matters exceed our
established reserves. |
|
|
|
Amounts that we may be required to replenish into our
affiliated funeral and cemetery trust funds in
order to meet minimal funding requirements.
|
|
|
|
The outcome of pending Internal Revenue Service audits. We maintain accruals for tax
liabilities which relate to uncertain tax matters. If these tax matters are unfavorably
resolved, we will make any required payments to tax authorities. If these tax matters are
favorably resolved, the accruals maintained by us will no longer be required, and these
amounts will be released through the tax provision at the time of resolution. |
|
|
|
Our ability to manage changes in consumer demand and/or pricing for our products and services
due to several factors, such as changes in numbers of deaths, cremation rates, competitive
pressures, and local economic conditions. |
|
|
|
Changes in domestic and international political and/or regulatory environments in which we
operate, including potential changes in tax, accounting, and trusting policies. |
|
|
|
Changes in credit relationships impacting the availability of credit and the general
availability of credit in the marketplace. |
|
|
|
Our ability to successfully access surety and insurance markets at a reasonable cost. |
|
|
|
Our ability to successfully leverage our substantial purchasing power with certain of our
vendors. |
|
|
|
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, and our ability to
certify the effectiveness of the internal controls and to obtain an unqualified attestation
report of our auditors regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting. |
|
|
|
The possibility that our credit agreement and privately placed debt securities may prevent us
from engaging in certain transactions. |
|
|
|
Our ability to buy our common stock under our share repurchase programs which could be
impacted by, among others, restrictive covenants in our bank agreements, unfavorable market
conditions, the market price of our common stock, the nature of other investment opportunities
presented to us from time to time, and the availability of funds necessary to continue
purchasing common stock. |
|
|
|
The financial condition of third-party insurance companies that fund our preneed funeral
contracts may impact our future revenues. |
|
|
|
Continued economic crisis and financial market declines could reduce future potential
earnings and cash flows and could result in future goodwill impairment. |
|
|
|
The weakening economy may cause customers to reassess preneed funeral or cemetery arrangements or decrease the
amounts atneed customers are willing to pay or consider cremation as opposed to
burial. |
|
|
|
Changes in our funeral and cemetery trust funds, investments in equity securities, fixed
income securities, and mutual funds could be significantly negatively impacted by the weakening
economy. |
For further information on these and other risks and uncertainties, see our Securities and
Exchange Commission filings, including our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Copies of this document
as well as other SEC filings can be obtained from our website at www.sci-corp.com. We assume no
obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements made herein or any other
forward-looking statements made by us, whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise.
43
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Marketable Equity and Debt Securities Price Risk
In connection with our preneed funeral operations and preneed cemetery merchandise and service
sales, the related funeral and cemetery trust funds own investments in equity and debt securities
and mutual funds, which are sensitive to current market prices.
Cost and market values as of March 31, 2009 are presented in Part I, Item 1. Financial
Statements and Notes 4, 5, and 6 of this Form 10-Q. Also, see Item 2, Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Financial Conditions, Liquidity and
Capital Resources, for discussion of recent volatility in financial markets.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As
of March 31, 2009, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)). Our
disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed
in the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified by the SECs rules
and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our
CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In light of
the material weakness set forth below, these officers have concluded that our disclosure controls
and procedures were not effective as of March 31, 2009. To address the material weakness described
below, we performed additional review and analysis and other post-closing procedures to ensure that
our income tax provision and related tax disclosures were prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (US GAAP). Based on the additional
procedures performed, management has concluded that the unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly present, in all material respects,
our financial condition, result of operations and cash flows for the periods presented in
conformity with US GAAP.
Material Weaknesses in Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Status of Remediation Efforts
As
reported in our Form 10-K as of December 31, 2008, we did not maintain effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 as a result of material weaknesses in
accounting for income taxes. Specifically, we did not maintain effective controls over the
completeness and accuracy of our quarterly and year-end tax provision calculations and related deferred income
taxes and income taxes payable in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
In response to the identified
material weakness, our management, with oversight from our Audit Committee, has
dedicated significant resources to enhance our internal control over financial reporting
and to remedy the identified material weakness. However, this material weakness continues to exist as of March 31, 2009.
Our management has implemented, or will implement, the remediation steps listed in Item 9A of our
Annual Report on Form 10-K to enhance our internal controls over the
calculation of our income tax provision and related balance sheet accounts.
We believe these
remediation steps, once implemented, will address the material weakness in our accounting for income taxes, and will enhance our internal control
over financial reporting and our disclosure controls and procedures.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the most
recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
44
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Information regarding legal proceedings is set forth in Note 14 in Item 1 of Part I of this
Form 10-Q, which information is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in our Risk Factors as set forth in Item 1A of our Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
On January 30, 2009, we issued 1,579 deferred common stock equivalents, or units, pursuant to
provisions regarding dividends under the Amended and Restated Director Fee Plan to four
non-employee directors. We did not receive any monetary consideration for the issuances. These
issuances were unregistered because they did not constitute a sale within the meaning of Section
2(3) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
As of March 31, 2009, the aggregate purchases pursuant to our share repurchase program totaled
$1.0 billion. As of March 31, 2009, the remaining dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased
under our share repurchase program was approximately $123.4 million. No shares were repurchased in
the first quarter of 2009.
Item 6. Exhibits
12.1 |
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Thomas L. Ryan as Chief Executive Officer in satisfaction of Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Eric D. Tanzberger as Principal Financial Officer in satisfaction of Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Periodic Financial Reports by Thomas L. Ryan as Chief Executive Officer in
satisfaction of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Periodic Financial Reports by Eric D. Tanzberger as Principal Financial
Officer in satisfaction of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
Undertaking
We hereby undertake, pursuant to Regulation S-K, Item 601(b), paragraph (4) (iii), to furnish
to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, upon request, all constituent instruments defining
the rights of holders of our long-term debt not filed herewith for the reason that the total amount
of securities authorized under any of such instruments does not exceed 10 percent of our total
consolidated assets.
45
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
May 8, 2009 |
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Jeffrey I. Beason
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey I. Beason |
|
|
|
Vice President and Corporate Controller
(Chief Accounting Officer) |
|
|
46
Index to Exhibits
12.1 |
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Thomas L. Ryan as Chief Executive Officer in satisfaction of Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Eric D. Tanzberger as Principal Financial Officer in satisfaction of Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Periodic Financial Reports by Thomas L. Ryan as Chief Executive Officer in
satisfaction of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Periodic Financial Reports by Eric D. Tanzberger as Principal Financial
Officer in satisfaction of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
47