sv4
Table of Contents

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 7, 2006
Registration No. 333-          
 
 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
Form S-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
 
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
         
California   5051   95-1142616
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
 
350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 5100
Los Angeles, California 90071
(213) 687-7700
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of Registrant’s principal executive offices)
 
David H. Hannah
Chief Executive Officer
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 5100
Los Angeles, California 90071
(213) 687-7700
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of agent for service)
 
With copies to:
         
David R. Decker, Esq.    William S. Johnson   Mark A. Conley, Esq.
J. Brett Pritchard, Esq.    Vice President, Chief Financial   Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
Lord, Bissell & Brook LLP   Officer and Secretary   2029 Century Park East, Suite 2600
300 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 800   Earle M. Jorgensen Company   Los Angeles, California 90067
Los Angeles, California 90071   10650 Alameda Street   (310) 788-4400
(213) 485-1500   Lynwood, California 90262
(323) 567-1122
   
 
     Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement becomes effective and upon completion of the merger described in the enclosed proxy statement/ prospectus.
     If the securities being registered on this Form are being offered in connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check the following box.    o
     If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.    o
     If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.    o
 
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
                         
                         
                         
            Proposed Maximum     Proposed Maximum     Amount of
Title of Each Class of     Amount to be     Offering Price     Aggregate     Registration
Securities to be Registered     Registered     per Share     Offering Price     Fee
                         
Common stock, no par value
    6,248,423(1)     N/A     $391,408,685(2)     $41,885
                         
                         
(1)  The number of shares of the Registrant’s common stock to be registered pursuant to this Registration Statement represents (a) the maximum number of shares of the Registrant’s common stock issuable in connection with the merger based on 50,237,094 outstanding shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of Earle M. Jorgensen Company, or EMJ, as of February 2, 2006 and assuming the maximum exchange ratio of 0.1207 of a share of the Registrant’s common stock for each share of EMJ common stock pursuant to the merger, (b) the maximum number of shares of the Registrant’s common stock issuable in the merger assuming that all outstanding options to purchase 808,000 shares of EMJ common stock are exercised prior to the merger and assuming a maximum exchange ratio of 0.1207 of Registrant’s common stock for each share of EMJ common stock and (c) the maximum number of shares of the Registrant’s common stock to be issued to the Earle M. Jorgensen Retirement Savings Plan pursuant to EMJ’s maximum obligation under such plan to contribute 723,109 shares of EMJ common stock and assuming a maximum exchange ratio of 0.1207 of Registrant’s common stock for each share of EMJ common stock.
 
(2)  Estimated solely for purposes of calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rules 457(c) and 457(f)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act. The proposed maximum aggregate offering price is the market value of the approximate number of shares of EMJ common stock to be cancelled and exchanged in the merger (calculated as set forth in note (1) above) in respect of the stock portion of the merger consideration. Therefore, the proposed maximum aggregate offering price is equal to the sum of (a) (i) 51,045,094, the maximum number of shares of EMJ common stock to be cancelled in the merger assuming the exercise of all outstanding options to purchase EMJ common stock prior to the merger multiplied by (ii) $7.47 (which is the difference between (A) the market value per share of EMJ common stock, based on the average of the high and low trading prices of EMJ common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange on February 2, 2006, which was $13.97, or the EMJ average stock price, and (B) the $6.50 in cash to be paid by the Registrant for each outstanding share of EMJ common stock cancelled pursuant to the merger agreement), and (b) (i) 723,109, the maximum number of shares of EMJ common stock to be issued to the Earle M. Jorgensen Retirement Savings Plan pursuant to EMJ’s obligation under such plan to contribute shares of EMJ common stock, multiplied by (ii) the EMJ average stock price.
     The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
 
 


Table of Contents

The information in this proxy statement/ prospectus is not complete and may be changed. Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. may not distribute and issue the shares of Reliance common stock being registered pursuant to this registration statement until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is declared effective. This proxy statement/ prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and Reliance is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where such offer or sales is not permitted.
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION DATED FEBRUARY 6, 2006
(EMJ LOGO)
Earle M. Jorgensen Company
10650 Alameda Street
Lynwood, California 90262
Merger Proposal
Proxy Statement/ Prospectus
                    , 2006
Dear Stockholder:
      We are pleased to invite you to a special meeting of stockholders of Earle M. Jorgensen Company, or EMJ, to be held on                    , 2006, at     :     a.m., local time, at the                    ,                    ,                    , California. At the special meeting, our stockholders will be asked to consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt and approve the Agreement and Plan of Merger, or merger agreement, dated as of January 17, 2006, by and among EMJ, RSAC Acquisition Corp., or RSAC, and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co., or Reliance.
      Reliance and EMJ have agreed on a merger transaction pursuant to which Reliance will acquire EMJ. If we complete the merger, EMJ will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Reliance and EMJ common stock will no longer be publicly traded. Reliance has offered total consideration for each share of EMJ common stock of approximately $13.00. In particular, upon completion of the merger, you will be entitled to receive for each share of EMJ common stock you own $6.50 in cash and between 0.0892 and 0.1207 of a share of Reliance common stock, depending on the average trading price per share of Reliance common stock on the New York Stock Exchange during a 20 trading day period ending with and including the second trading day prior to completion of the merger. The formula for determining the appropriate fraction of a share of Reliance common stock to be issued in exchange for each share of EMJ common stock is set forth in detail in the accompanying proxy statement/ prospectus.
      Depending on the exchange ratio and the number of shares of EMJ common stock outstanding, Reliance will issue a minimum of approximately 4.5 million and a maximum of approximately 6.1 million shares of common stock. Therefore, immediately after completion of the merger, EMJ stockholders will hold a minimum of approximately 11.9% and a maximum of approximately 15.5% of Reliance’s then outstanding common stock.
      The exchange ratio will not be determined until after the date of the special meeting. Therefore, when you are asked to vote on the merger at the time of the special meeting, you will not know the precise value of the merger consideration that you will receive on the date the merger is completed. Reliance common stock is quoted on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “RS.” On February 3, 2006, the closing sales price of a share of Reliance common stock was $81.57. EMJ common stock is quoted on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “JOR.” On February 3, 2006, the closing sales price of a share of EMJ common stock was $13.94.
      EMJ’s board of directors determined that the merger agreement is advisable and in the best interests of EMJ and its stockholders. Accordingly, EMJ’s board of directors unanimously approved the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, and unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the adoption and the approval of the merger agreement at the special meeting.
      We encourage you to read the accompanying proxy statement/ prospectus carefully because it explains the proposed merger, the documents related to the merger, the special meeting and other related matters. In particular, please see the section entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 30 of this proxy statement/ prospectus. You can also obtain other information about EMJ and Reliance from documents each party has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
     
David M. Roderick
Chairman of the Board
Earle M. Jorgensen Company
  Maurice S. Nelson, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
Earle M. Jorgensen Company
      Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved the securities to be issued pursuant to this proxy statement/ prospectus or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this proxy statement/ prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
      The date of this proxy statement/ prospectus is                    , 2006,
and it is first being mailed or otherwise delivered to EMJ stockholders on or about                    , 2006.


Table of Contents

(EMJ LOGO)
Earle M. Jorgensen Company
10650 Alameda Street
Lynwood, California 90262
 
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held On                         , 2006
 
     We will hold a special meeting of stockholders of Earle M. Jorgensen Company, or EMJ, on                   , 2006, at     :     a.m., local time, at                   located at                   , California. The purpose of the special meeting is to:
       (1) allow you to consider and vote on a proposal to adopt and approve an Agreement and Plan of Merger, or merger agreement, dated as of January 17, 2006, by and among EMJ, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co., or Reliance, and RSAC Acquisition Corp., a newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiary of Reliance, or RSAC, pursuant to which EMJ will merge with and into RSAC, with RSAC as the surviving corporation; and
 
       (2) transact any other business that may properly come before the special meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the special meeting.
     The accompanying proxy statement/ prospectus describes the proposed merger, the merger agreement and related matters in more detail. A copy of the merger agreement is attached to this proxy statement/ prospectus as Annex A. We encourage you to read the entire proxy statement/ prospectus carefully. In particular, you should carefully consider the discussion entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 30. The proxy statement/ prospectus sets forth certain appraisal rights that may exist in the event the proposed merger agreement is approved and you dissent to the merger in a timely manner and in accordance with Delaware law.
     EMJ’s board of directors set  2006, as the record date for the special meeting. As a result, holders of record of EMJ common stock at the close of business on                   , 2006 are entitled to notice of, and to vote with respect to, all matters to be acted upon at the special meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the special meeting.
     EMJ’s board of directors unanimously approved the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, and unanimously recommends that EMJ stockholders vote “FOR” the adoption and approval of the merger agreement.
     All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the special meeting in person. However, whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting in person, you are urged to promptly submit your proxy:
  •  by completing, signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card(s) in the envelope provided,
 
  •  by telephone, or
 
  •  over the Internet.
     The proxy card(s) requires no postage if mailed in the United States in the enclosed, self-addressed return envelope. You may revoke your proxy in the manner described in the accompanying proxy statement/ prospectus at any time before your shares have been voted at the special meeting, including by attending the meeting and voting your shares in person.
     Your vote is important. If you own shares directly, your failure to vote those shares or an abstention from voting will have the same effect as a vote against the merger. If you hold your shares through a broker and fail to direct your broker as to how those shares are to be voted, the broker will not vote those shares. This will also have the same effect as a vote against the adoption and approval of the merger agreement. If you are a participant in the EMJ retirement savings plan and you fail to direct the plan’s trustee as to how those shares are to be voted, the trustee will vote those shares in the same proportion as the votes of shares for which the trustee has received directions from other participants in the retirement savings plan.
     You should not send EMJ stock certificates with your proxy card(s). After completion of the merger, the exchange/paying agent will send you written instructions for exchanging EMJ stock certificates for cash and Reliance stock certificates.
     If you have any questions, or need assistance in voting your proxy, you may call William S. Johnson, EMJ’s secretary, at (323) 567-1122.
  By order of the Board of Directors
 
  William S. Johnson
  VICE PRESIDENT, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  AND SECRETARY
Lynwood, California
                    , 2006


Table of Contents

REFERENCES TO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
      This proxy statement/ prospectus incorporates important business and financial information about Reliance and EMJ that is not included in, or delivered with, this proxy statement/ prospectus. You can obtain documents incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus, other than certain exhibits to incorporated information, by requesting them in writing or by telephone from the appropriate company at the following addresses and telephone numbers, or by visiting the following Websites:
     
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.    Earle M. Jorgensen Company
350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 5100
  10650 Alameda Street
Los Angeles, California 90071
  Lynwood, California 90262
Attention: Investor Relations
  Attention: Investor Relations
Telephone: (213) 687-7700
  Telephone: (323) 567-1122
Website: www.rsac.com
  Website: www.emjmetals.com
      You will not be charged for any of these documents that you request. EMJ stockholders requesting documents should do so by                     , 2006, in order to receive them before the special meeting.
      For a more detailed description about the information incorporated in this proxy statement/ prospectus, see “Where You Can Find More Information” on page 117.
      EMJ has supplied all information contained or incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus relating to EMJ, and Reliance has supplied all information contained or incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus relating to Reliance.
      Information contained on Reliance’s and EMJ’s Websites is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus.
      You should rely only on the information contained or incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different. This proxy statement/ prospectus may only be used where it is legal to sell these securities. The information in this proxy statement/ prospectus may only be accurate on the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus.


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS
           
    Page
     
    1  
    1  
    2  
    4  
    5  
    5  
    6  
    6  
    8  
    8  
    9  
    10  
    11  
Conditions to the Completion of the Merger
    11  
    12  
Termination Fee to be Paid by EMJ
    12  
    13  
    13  
    13  
    13  
Accounting Treatment of the Merger
    14  
    14  
Comparative Market Prices and Dividends
    14  
Surrender of EMJ Stock Certificates
    14  
    15  
    17  
    22  
    23  
    25  
      25  
      26  
      26  
    28  
    30  
      30  
      33  
    41  
      41  
      41  
      41  
      41  
      41  


Table of Contents

           
    Page
     
      42  
      42  
      42  
      42  
      43  
      43  
      44  
      44  
      44  
      44  
      45  
      45  
    46  
      46  
      46  
      50  
      52  
      52  
      57  
      67  
 
Management and Operations Following the Merger
    68  
      68  
      72  
 
EMJ’s Financing Arrangements
    72  
      72  
      73  
 
Restrictions on Sale of Shares by Affiliates of EMJ and Reliance
    73  
      74  
    75  
      75  
      75  
      76  
      77  
      77  
      77  
      77  
      78  
      80  
      82  
      83  

ii


Table of Contents

           
    Page
     
      85  
      86  
    87  
      87  
      88  
      89  
      89  
    90  
    91  
      91  
      91  
    92  
      92  
      92  
    93  
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO. UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
    94  
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO. NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
    95  
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO. UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED STATEMENT OF INCOME
    96  
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO. UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED STATEMENT OF INCOME
    97  
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO. NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
    98  
 
Description of Reliance Capital Stock
    100  
    101  
      101  
      101  
      102  
      102  
      102  
      103  
 
Special Meetings of the Board
    103  
 
Special Meetings of the Shareholders
    103  
      104  
      105  
      105  
      105  
      105  
      106  
      106  
      107  
      108  
      108  

iii


Table of Contents

           
    Page
     
      109  
      109  
      110  
      111  
      111  
      112  
      112  
      112  
    113  
    115  
    115  
    115  
    115  
    115  
LIST OF ANNEXES
       
    A-1  
    B-1  
    C-1  
    D-1  
    E-1  
 Exhibit 5.1
 Exhibit 8.1
 Exhibit 8.2
 Exhibit 21.1
 Exhibit 23.1
 Exhibit 23.2
 Exhibit 99.1
 Exhibit 99.2
 Exhibit 99.3

iv


Table of Contents

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT
THE MERGER AND THE SPECIAL MEETING
      The following are some questions that you, as a stockholder of Earle M. Jorgensen Company, or EMJ, may have regarding the merger and the special meeting of EMJ stockholders and brief answers to those questions. We urge you to read carefully this proxy statement/ prospectus, including the documents included as annexes, because the information in this section does not provide all the information that might be important to you with respect to the matters being considered at the special meeting. Additional important information is also contained in the documents that are incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus.
About the Merger
Q: What is the purpose of the special meeting?
 
A: Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co., or Reliance, is proposing to acquire EMJ. You are being asked to vote to adopt and approve the Agreement and Plan of Merger, or the merger agreement, dated as of January 17, 2006, by and among EMJ, Reliance and RSAC Acquisition Corp, or RSAC, through which EMJ will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Reliance. Upon completion of the merger, EMJ common stock will no longer be publicly traded, and you will receive consideration, consisting of cash and a fraction of a share of Reliance common stock, for each share of EMJ common stock you hold. As part of the merger, RSAC will change its name to Earle M. Jorgensen Company. For more information concerning the merger consideration, please see the section entitled “Summary of the Proxy Statement/ Prospectus — What You Will Receive” beginning on page 6 of this proxy statement/ prospectus.
 
Q: What is this document?
 
A: EMJ’s board of directors is using this document as a proxy statement to solicit proxies from the holders of EMJ common stock for use at the special meeting. In addition, Reliance is sending this document to EMJ stockholders as a prospectus in connection with the issuance of registered shares of Reliance common stock in exchange for shares of EMJ common stock in the merger.
 
Q: Does EMJ’s board of directors recommend that EMJ stockholders vote “FOR” the merger agreement?
 
A: Yes. EMJ’s board of directors unanimously recommends that EMJ stockholders vote “FOR” the adoption and approval of the merger agreement. To review the board’s reasons for recommending the merger agreement, please see the section entitled “The Merger — EMJ’s Reasons for the Merger” and “The Merger — Recommendation of EMJ’s Board of Directors” beginning on page 52 of this proxy statement/ prospectus.
 
Q: When do you expect to complete the merger?
 
A: We expect to complete the merger as soon as possible after EMJ stockholders adopt and approve the merger agreement at the special meeting and after the satisfaction or waiver of all other conditions to the merger, which are described in this proxy statement/prospectus. We cannot predict when, or if, these conditions will be satisfied or waived, although we believe the merger can be completed in the second quarter of 2006.

1


Table of Contents

About the Special Meeting
Q: When and where is the EMJ special meeting?
 
A: The EMJ special meeting will take place on                    , 2006, at      :     a.m., local time, and will be held at                     .
 
Q: Who is entitled to vote at the special meeting?
 
A: Holders of record of EMJ common stock at the close of business on                    , 2006, which is the date EMJ’s board of directors has fixed as the record date for the special meeting, are entitled to vote at the special meeting.
 
Q: What is the required vote to adopt and approve the merger agreement?
 
A: For the merger to occur, the merger agreement must be adopted and approved by the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of EMJ common stock. As a condition to the signing of the merger agreement, Reliance required certain EMJ stockholders that hold approximately 50.1% of the outstanding EMJ common stock to enter into a voting agreement to vote all of their shares in favor of the adoption and approval of the merger agreement. Therefore, unless the voting agreement is terminated prior to the special meeting in accordance with its terms, you should expect that the merger agreement will be approved at the special meeting regardless of the votes of any other EMJ stockholders. For additional information regarding the voting agreement, including the termination provisions, please see the summary of the voting agreement under “The Voting Agreement” beginning on page 90.
    The stockholders of Reliance are not required to approve the merger agreement.
Q: How do I vote shares I own directly?
 
A: You can vote in person at the special meeting or you can vote by telephone, on the Internet or by mail as described below. Votes by telephone or the Internet must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time,                     , 2006. We recommend that you vote by proxy, even if you plan to attend the special meeting. If you abstain from voting or do not vote your shares, it will have the same effect as voting against the adoption and approval of the merger agreement.
 
If your shares are held in your name, you can vote by proxy as follows:
 
• By telephone: Use the toll-free number listed on the proxy card. Easy-to-follow voice prompts allow you to vote your shares.
 
• By Internet: The Website for Internet voting is listed on the proxy card.
 
• By mail: Complete, sign, date and return your proxy card in the enclosed pre-addressed, postage-paid envelope.
 
The telephone and Internet voting procedures use a control number that appears on your proxy card to authenticate you as a stockholder of record and to allow you to confirm that your voting instructions have been correctly recorded. If you vote by telephone or Internet, you do not need to return the proxy card.
 
Q: How do I vote shares I hold through a nominee?
 
A: If you hold shares through someone else, such as a stockbroker, bank or other nominee, you will receive material from that firm asking how you want to vote. You can complete the firm’s voting form and return it to the firm. If the firm offers telephone or Internet voting, the voting form will contain instructions on how to access those voting methods. If you do not provide your broker, bank or nominee with instructions on how to vote your shares, your broker, bank or other nominee will not be permitted to vote your shares on the merger agreement, which will have the same effect as voting against the adoption and approval of the merger agreement. Therefore, you should be sure to provide your broker, bank or other nominee with instructions on how to vote your shares.

2


Table of Contents

If you intend to vote your nominee shares in person at the special meeting, you must bring to the special meeting an account statement or letter from the nominee indicating that you beneficially owned the shares on                     , the record date for voting.
 
Q: How do I vote shares I hold in the Earle M. Jorgensen Retirement Savings Plan?
 
A: If you hold EMJ common stock in the Earle M. Jorgensen Retirement Savings Plan, the trustee will vote those shares as you direct through your voting instructions via telephone, Internet or the enclosed proxy voting instruction card to T. Rowe Price Trust Company, as trustee. Your proxy voting instruction card (or any revocation of your prior proxy voting instruction card) must be received by the trustee by 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on                    , 2006. If the trustee does not receive timely voting instructions from you, the trustee will vote all shares in the retirement savings plan for which it did not receive voting directions in the same proportion as the votes of the retirement savings plan shares for which it received timely voting directions from other participants in the retirement savings plan.
 
Q: May I change my vote after I submitted my proxy?
 
A: Yes. If you are the stockholder of record, you may change your vote in one of the following ways before your proxy is voted at the special meeting:
 
• submit to the secretary of EMJ a revocation letter with a later date than your proxy card;
 
• deliver, no later than 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on                     , 2006, a second completed and signed proxy card dated later than the first signed proxy card;
 
• vote at a later time, but no later than 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on                     , 2006, by telephone or the Internet; or
 
• attend the special meeting and vote in person.
 
If you hold your shares through a broker, bank or other nominee, you may later revoke your proxy instructions by informing such firm in accordance with the firm’s procedures.
 
If you hold your shares through the retirement savings plan, you must:
 
• deliver, no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on                     , 2006, a second completed and signed proxy voting instruction card dated later than the first signed proxy voting instruction card; or
 
• vote at a later time, but no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on                     , 2006, by telephone or the Internet.
 
Q: Do I need to attend the special meeting in person?
 
A: No. It is not necessary for you to attend the special meeting to vote your shares if EMJ has previously received your proxy, although you are welcome to attend.
 
Q: Should I send in my EMJ stock certificates with my proxy card?
 
A: No. Please do not send your EMJ stock certificates with your proxy card. After the merger is completed, Computershare Investor Services, acting as our exchange/paying agent, will send you instructions (including a letter of transmittal) explaining how to exchange your shares of EMJ common stock for the appropriate number of shares of Reliance common stock and cash.
 
Q: What if I receive more than one proxy card or proxy voting instruction card for the special meeting?
 
A: This may mean that your shares of EMJ common stock are held in different ways or in more than one account. Please complete, sign, date and return by one of the methods described herein all proxy cards or proxy voting instruction cards you receive to ensure that all of your shares of EMJ common stock are voted at the special meeting.

3


Table of Contents

How to Get More Information
Q: Where can I find more information about EMJ and Reliance?
 
A: Much of the business and financial information about Reliance and EMJ that may be important to you is not included in this proxy statement/ prospectus. Instead, this information is incorporated by reference to documents separately filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, by Reliance and EMJ. This means that Reliance and EMJ may satisfy its disclosure obligations to you by referring you to documents separately filed with the SEC by them. See “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 117, for a list of documents that Reliance and EMJ have incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/ prospectus and for instructions on how to obtain copies of these documents. The documents are available to you without charge.
 
Q: Whom do I call if I have questions about the merger or the special meeting?
 
A: If you have any questions about the merger or the special meeting or if you need additional copies of this proxy statement/ prospectus or the enclosed proxy card, you should contact EMJ’s Secretary, William S. Johnson, at (323) 567-1122.

4


Table of Contents

SUMMARY OF THE PROXY STATEMENT/ PROSPECTUS
      This summary highlights information from this proxy statement/ prospectus and may not contain all of the information that is important to you. Accordingly, Reliance and EMJ encourage you to carefully read this entire proxy statement/ prospectus, including the Annexes, and the documents that are incorporated by reference. You may obtain a copy of the documents that Reliance and EMJ have incorporated by reference without charge by following the instructions in the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 117 of this proxy statement/ prospectus. We have included page references in this summary to direct you to more complete descriptions of the topics presented in this summary.
The Companies
  Earle M. Jorgensen Company (page 92)
  10650 Alameda Street
  Lynwood, California 90262
  (323) 567-1122
      EMJ was formed on May 3, 1990, when affiliates of Kelso & Companies Inc. acquired control of and combined two leading metals distributors, EMJ (founded in 1921) and Kilsby-Roberts Holding Co. (successor to C.A. Roberts Company, founded in 1916). In connection with the combination of these two companies, EMJ became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Earle M. Jorgensen Holding Company, Inc., or Holding, a holding company formed for the sole purpose of acquiring EMJ. On April 20, 2005, EMJ completed its merger and financial restructuring, pursuant to which Holding was merged with and into a wholly-owned subsidiary of EMJ with such subsidiary surviving the merger.
      EMJ is a leading distributor of metal bar and tubular products used by North American manufacturing companies and has been in business for over 80 years. EMJ purchases over 25,000 different metal products in large quantities from primary producers, including a broad mix of carbon, alloy and stainless steel and aluminum bar, tubular and plate products. EMJ sells these metal products in smaller quantities to over 35,000 customers spanning various industries, including machine tools, industrial equipment, transportation, fluid power, oil, gas and energy, fabricated metal, and construction and agricultural equipment. EMJ distributes its broad range of metal products and provides its customers value-added metal processing and inventory management services from its distribution network of 39 strategically located service and processing centers in the United States and Canada.
      EMJ’s revenues for the year ended March 31, 2005 and the six months ended September 28, 2005 were approximately $1.6 billion and $856.9 million, respectively, and its net income for the same periods was approximately $97.5 million and $41.5 million, respectively.
  Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (page 91)
  350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 5100
  Los Angeles, California 90071
  (213) 687-7700
      Reliance was founded in 1939 in Los Angeles, California and began as a fabricator of steel reinforcing bar. Today, Reliance is one of the five largest metals service center companies in the United States. Reliance’s network of 24 divisions, 21 operating subsidiaries and one 70%-owned company, operates more than 100 locations in 32 states, Belgium and South Korea. Through its 70%-owned company, Reliance has entered into an agreement to acquire a facility in the People’s Republic of China. Through this network, Reliance provides metals processing services and distributes a full line of more than 90,000 metal products, including alloy, aluminum, brass, copper, carbon steel, titanium, stainless steel and specialty steel products, to more than 95,000 customers in a broad range of industries. Reliance delivers products from facilities in Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas,

5


Table of Contents

Utah, Washington and Wisconsin. One of Reliance’s subsidiaries has a location in South Korea that serves the Asian semiconductor market. Another subsidiary opened a metals service center in Belgium in January 2003 to service the European aerospace market.
      Reliance’s net sales for the year ended December 31, 2004 and the nine months ended September 30, 2005 were approximately $2.9 billion and $2.5 billion, respectively. Reliance’s net income for the year ended December 31, 2004 and the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was approximately $169.7 million and $144.8 million, respectively.
  RSAC Acquisition Corp.
  350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 5100
  Los Angeles, California 90071
  (213) 687-7700
      RSAC, a Delaware corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Reliance, formed for the purpose of effecting the merger. RSAC has engaged in no business activities to date and it has no material assets or liabilities of any kind, other than those incident to its formation and those incurred in connection with the merger.
Structure of the Merger (page 75)
      On January 17, 2006, EMJ, Reliance and RSAC entered into the merger agreement, which is the legal document governing the merger. Under the terms of the merger agreement, EMJ will merge with and into RSAC, with RSAC continuing as the surviving corporation. As part of the merger, RSAC’s name will be changed to Earle M. Jorgensen Company and will remain a wholly-owned subsidiary of Reliance. Upon completion of the merger, EMJ common stock will be cancelled and will no longer be publicly traded.
      The merger agreement is attached to this proxy statement/ prospectus as Annex A. We strongly urge EMJ stockholders to carefully read the merger agreement in its entirety. For a summary of the merger agreement, please see the section entitled “The Merger Agreement” beginning on page 75 of this proxy statement/ prospectus.
      On January 17, 2006, the Kelso Funds (as defined in this summary under “— Fairness Opinions, Opinion of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC to EMJ’s Board of Directors” beginning on page 9 of this proxy statement/ prospectus), holders of 50.1% of EMJ’s outstanding common stock, entered into a voting agreement, or the voting agreement, with Reliance providing that they would vote, subject to certain exceptions, all of the shares of EMJ common stock owned by them in favor of the adoption and approval of the merger agreement.
      The voting agreement is attached to this proxy statement/ prospectus as Annex B. We strongly urge EMJ stockholders to carefully read the voting agreement in its entirety. For a summary of the voting agreement, please see the section entitled “The Voting Agreement” beginning on page 90 of this proxy statement/ prospectus.
What You Will Receive (page 75)
Common Stock
      If we complete the merger, each EMJ stockholder will be entitled to receive $6.50 in cash and a fraction of a share of Reliance common stock that is to-be-determined for each outstanding share of EMJ common stock. The value of the Reliance common stock component will be approximately $6.50, but is subject to adjustment based on the average closing price of Reliance common stock on the New York Stock Exchange for the 20-day period ending on, and including, the second trading day prior to the closing

6


Table of Contents

of the merger, or the pricing period. If the average closing price of Reliance common stock during the pricing period is:
  •  more than $72.86, you will receive Reliance common stock with a value that may be greater than $6.50 for each share of EMJ common stock;
 
  •  equal to or less than $72.86 but equal to or more than $53.86, you will receive Reliance common stock with a value of $6.50 for each share of EMJ common stock; and
 
  •  less than $53.86, you will receive Reliance common stock with a value that may be less than $6.50 for each share of EMJ common stock.
      The number of shares of Reliance common stock you will receive in the merger will equal the number, rounded down to the nearest whole number, determined by multiplying the exchange ratio by the number of shares of EMJ common stock you own.
      You will not receive any fractional shares of Reliance common stock in the merger. Instead, you will receive cash from Reliance, without interest, for any fractional share of Reliance common stock that you might otherwise have been entitled to receive, based on the average closing price of Reliance common stock for the pricing period.
      The exchange ratio will not be determined until after the date of the special meeting. Therefore, at the time of the special meeting, you will not know the precise value of the merger consideration you will receive when the merger is completed.
      Reliance will adjust the number of shares of Reliance common stock that you receive for each of your shares of EMJ common stock based upon the average closing price of Reliance common stock for the pricing period. If the average closing price of Reliance common stock for the pricing period is:
  •  more than $72.86, then you will receive 0.0892 shares of Reliance common stock for each share of EMJ common stock that you own;
 
  •  equal to or less than $72.86 but equal to or more than $53.86, then you will receive a fraction of a share of Reliance common stock equal to $6.50 divided by the average closing price of Reliance common stock during the pricing period; and
 
  •  less than $53.86, then you will receive 0.1207 shares of Reliance common stock for each share of EMJ common stock you own.
      Example 1: If you hold 100 shares of EMJ common stock and the average closing price of Reliance common stock during the pricing period is $75.00, you will receive $650 plus 8 shares of Reliance common stock (based on an exchange ratio equal to 0.0892). In addition, you will receive a cash payment of $69.00 in lieu of the 0.92 shares of Reliance common stock that you would have otherwise received.
      Example 2: If you hold 100 shares of EMJ common stock and the average closing price of Reliance common stock during the pricing period is $68.00, you will receive $650 plus 9 shares of Reliance common stock (based on an exchange ratio equal to $6.50/$68.00). In addition, you will receive a cash payment of $38.01 in lieu of the 0.559 shares of Reliance common stock that you would have otherwise received.
      Example 3: If you hold 100 shares of EMJ common stock and the average closing price of Reliance common stock during the pricing period is $40.00, you will receive $650 plus 12 shares of Reliance common stock (based on an exchange ratio equal to 0.1207). In addition, you will receive a cash payment of $2.80 in lieu of the 0.07 shares of Reliance common stock that you would have otherwise received.
      We expect the market price of Reliance common stock to fluctuate prior to the merger. Therefore, the average closing price of Reliance common stock for the pricing period may be higher or lower than the closing price of Reliance common stock on the date of the merger agreement and the date of the special meeting. In addition, because the exchange ratio is fixed at the end of the second trading day before the closing of the merger, the value of the Reliance common stock that you will receive in the merger may

7


Table of Contents

increase or decrease before the date we complete the merger. You should obtain current stock price quotations for Reliance common stock prior to voting on the merger.
      Depending on the exchange ratio, and based upon 50,237,094 shares of EMJ common stock outstanding as of January 17, 2006, Reliance will issue a minimum of 4,481,148 and a maximum of 6,063,617 shares of common stock. Therefore immediately after completion of the merger, EMJ stockholders will hold a minimum of approximately 11.9% and a maximum of approximately 15.5% of Reliance’s then outstanding common stock.
Holding Stock Options
      Each option to purchase shares of EMJ common stock that was granted pursuant to the Earle M. Jorgensen Holding Company, Inc. Option Plan, or Holding option plan, which was assumed by EMJ in April 2005, will be converted into the right to receive an amount, if any, equal to (1) the difference between (a) $13.00 and (b) the applicable per share exercise price, multiplied by (2) the number of shares of EMJ common stock subject to such stock option, subject to any applicable withholding of taxes.
EMJ Stock Options
      Each option to purchase shares of EMJ common stock that was granted pursuant to the Earle M. Jorgensen Company 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, or EMJ incentive plan, will be converted into an option to purchase Reliance common stock and will continue to be governed by the terms of the EMJ incentive plan and related grant agreements under which they were granted, except that:
  •  the number of shares of Reliance common stock subject to a new Reliance stock option will be equal to the product of the number of shares of EMJ common stock subject to the EMJ stock option and the option exchange ratio, rounded down to the nearest whole share; and
 
  •  the exercise price per share of Reliance common stock subject to the new Reliance stock option will be equal to the exercise price per share of EMJ common stock under the EMJ stock option divided by the option exchange ratio, rounded up to the nearest cent.
      The option exchange ratio will be the product of the exchange ratio used to determine the fraction of a share of Reliance common stock to be issued for each share of EMJ common stock in the merger multiplied by two to account for the fact that cash consideration will not be paid for these options.
Recommendation of EMJ’s Board of Directors (page 52)
      After careful consideration, EMJ’s board of directors determined that the merger agreement and the merger are advisable and in the best interests of EMJ and its stockholders and unanimously approved the merger agreement. Accordingly, EMJ’s board of directors unanimously recommends that stockholders vote “FOR” the adoption and approval of the merger agreement at the special meeting.
EMJ’s Reasons for the Merger (page 50)
      EMJ’s board of directors believes that this merger will create an industry leader in the distribution of flat-rolled, tubular and bar products and carbon steel, stainless steel and aluminum products. EMJ’s board of directors based its decision to approve the merger agreement on many factors including:
  •  the premium offered for the shares of EMJ common stock;
 
  •  its belief that the merger was more favorable to stockholders than any other alternative reasonably available to EMJ and its stockholders;
 
  •  its belief that Reliance would be able to complete the transaction and successfully integrate the EMJ operations;
 
  •  its belief that the market price of the EMJ common stock was not likely to rise to the level of the purchase price in the near future if EMJ continued as an independent company;

8


Table of Contents

  •  the financial and other terms and conditions of the merger agreement;
 
  •  the fact that the transaction will be immediately accretive to the earnings of Reliance and the stockholders of EMJ will be able to participate in the potential benefits of the transaction to the Reliance common stock;
 
  •  the market position of the combined company;
 
  •  the financial presentation and opinion of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, or Credit Suisse; and
 
  •  the financial presentation and opinion of Duff & Phelps Securities, LLC, or Duff & Phelps.
      For a summary of the factors considered by EMJ’s board of directors in making its decision to approve the merger agreement and recommend its adoption and approval to the EMJ stockholders, please see the section entitled “The Merger — EMJ’s Reasons for the Merger” and “The Merger — Recommendation of EMJ’s Board of Directors” beginning on page 52 of this proxy statement/prospectus.
Fairness Opinions
      Opinion of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC to EMJ’s Board of Directors (page 52)
      In connection with the merger, Credit Suisse delivered a written opinion to EMJ’s board of directors that the merger consideration to be received by the holders of EMJ common stock (other than Reliance and its subsidiaries, and Kelso Investment Associates, L.P., or KIA I, Kelso Equity Partners II, L.P., or KEP II, KIA III-Earle M. Jorgensen, L.P., or KIA III-EMJ, and Kelso Investment Associates IV, L.P., or KIA IV, collectively referred to as the Kelso Funds, and their respective affiliates) in the merger is fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders. The full text of Credit Suisse’s written opinion, dated January 17, 2006, is attached to this proxy statement/ prospectus as Annex C. We encourage you to read this opinion carefully and in its entirety for a description of the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken. Credit Suisse’s opinion was provided to EMJ’s board of directors in connection with its evaluation of the merger consideration, does not address any other aspect of the merger and does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder as to how such stockholder should vote or act with respect to any matters relating to the merger.
      Opinion of Duff & Phelps Securities, LLC to EMJ’s Board of Directors (page 57)
      In connection with the merger, Duff & Phelps delivered a written opinion to EMJ’s board of directors that the consideration to be received by the holders of EMJ common stock (other than Reliance and its subsidiaries, and the Kelso Funds and their respective affiliates) in the merger is fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders. The full text of Duff & Phelps’ written opinion, dated January 17, 2006, is attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Annex D. We encourage you to read this opinion carefully and in its entirety for a description of the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken. Duff & Phelps’ opinion was provided to EMJ’s board of directors in connection with its evaluation of the merger consideration, does not address any other aspect of the merger and does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder as to how such stockholder should vote or act with respect to any matters relating to the merger.

9


Table of Contents

The EMJ Special Meeting (page 41)
Date, Time and Place
      The special meeting will be held on                    , 2006, at     :     a.m., local time, at ,California.
Matters to be Considered
      You will be asked to consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt the merger agreement.
Record Date
      If you own shares of EMJ common stock at the close of business on                     , 2006, referred to as the record date, you will be entitled to vote at the special meeting. You have one vote for each share of EMJ common stock owned on the record date. As of                     , 2006, there were                     stockholders of record of EMJ common stock, as shown on the records of EMJ’s transfer agent.
Required Votes
      Adoption and approval of the merger agreement requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of EMJ common stock outstanding on the record date. As a condition to the signing of the merger agreement, Reliance required the Kelso Funds, which collectively own approximately 50.1% of the EMJ common stock outstanding, to enter into a voting agreement to vote all of their shares in favor of adoption and approval of the merger agreement. Therefore, unless the voting agreement is terminated in accordance with its terms, the merger agreement will be adopted and approved at the special meeting regardless of the votes of any other stockholders.
Interests of EMJ’s Directors and Executive Officers (page 68)
      In considering EMJ’s board of directors’ recommendation, EMJ stockholders should be aware that some officers, directors, and other key employees of EMJ have interests in the merger that are different from, or in addition to, those of EMJ stockholders generally, including the following:
  •  Pursuant to an existing retention agreement between EMJ and Maurice S. Nelson, Jr., the chief executive officer and a director of EMJ, Mr. Nelson is entitled to a bonus of $3 million if his employment with EMJ is terminated for good reason, which includes ongoing diminution in his title, duties or responsibilities or a material reduction in his base salary or benefits. Mr. Nelson’s employment as chief executive officer will terminate for good reason (as defined in his retention agreement) upon completion of the merger and he will become entitled to payment of the bonus of $3 million six months after completion of the merger.
 
  •  On January 17, 2006, William S. Johnson, the vice president, chief financial officer and secretary of EMJ, entered into a retention agreement with EMJ that provides for employment and severance benefits and has a term of three years, unless terminated earlier pursuant to its terms. Mr. Johnson’s retention agreement provides generally that his terms and conditions of employment (including position, responsibility, location, compensation and benefits) will not be adversely changed during the term of the agreement and provides for certain minimum guaranteed compensation levels (including base salary, annual bonus, long-term incentives and participation in benefit plans) during such term. If he remains employed by EMJ, Mr. Johnson will receive bonuses of approximately $425,000 and $200,000 at the six-month and twelve-month anniversaries of the effective date of the merger, respectively.
 
  •  On January 17, 2006, EMJ’s board of directors approved a special bonus plan for senior management providing that, immediately prior to the closing of the merger, EMJ will pay a taxable bonus to certain members of EMJ’s senior management in connection with the completion of the merger in an aggregate amount not to exceed $5 million, which bonus will be allocated to such members of EMJ’s senior management as determined by EMJ’s board of directors.

10


Table of Contents

  •  The Kelso Funds and their affiliates, including Mr. Nickell and Mr. Wahrhaftig who are directors of EMJ, hold 25,205,133 shares of EMJ’s common stock, of those shares, 25,174,634 shares are held by the Kelso Funds representing 50.1% of the issued and outstanding shares of EMJ’s common stock. The Kelso Funds have entered into the voting agreement with Reliance pursuant to which they have agreed to vote the shares of EMJ common stock held by them in favor of the adoption and approval of the merger agreement. Upon completion of the merger, the Kelso Funds and their affiliates will receive aggregate merger consideration consisting of approximately $163.8 million in cash and 2,340,142 shares of Reliance common stock (assuming the average closing price of the Reliance common stock for the pricing period is equal to $70.01, which would be the average closing price for the pricing period if the pricing period ended on January 31, 2006).
 
  •  Reliance entered into a registration rights agreement, dated as of January 17, 2006, or the registration rights agreement, with the Kelso Funds pursuant to which Reliance will prepare and file, within ten days of the closing of the merger, a registration statement under the Securities Act at Reliance’s expense, covering all or a portion of the Kelso Funds’ shares. Pursuant to the registration rights agreement, Reliance also will provide the Kelso Funds with certain demand and piggyback registration rights with respect to the shares of Reliance common stock received by the Kelso Funds in the merger.
 
  •  EMJ’s executive officers participate in EMJ’s retirement savings plan and EMJ’s executive officers and some of EMJ’s directors participate in EMJ’s equity plans under which stock options have been granted. Upon completion of the merger, executive officers and certain directors of EMJ will receive the same merger consideration as the other stockholders of EMJ for their EMJ common stock, they will receive options to purchase Reliance common stock for their EMJ stock options under the EMJ stock incentive plan and cash in exchange for their options outstanding under the Holding option plan. They will receive cash for their Holding options as follows: Mr. Nelson will receive approximately $16.8 million, Mr. Roderick will receive approximately $1.7 million, each of Messrs. Rutledge and Marquard will receive approximately $678,000, each of Messrs. McCaffery, Travetto, Henry and Hoffman will receive approximately $1.58 million and Mr. Johnson will receive approximately $1.13 million.
 
  •  EMJ’s executive officers and directors will be entitled to continued indemnification and certain liability insurance coverage under the merger agreement.
Transaction-Related Costs and Financing Arrangements (page 72)
      Upon completion of the merger, Reliance will pay cash consideration of approximately $356 million to EMJ stockholders and option holders, issue between approximately 4.5 million and 6.1 million shares of its common stock and assume approximately $299 million of EMJ’s debt (based on EMJ’s outstanding indebtedness as of September 28, 2005).
      Reliance intends to finance the cash portion of the consideration to be paid to EMJ stockholders and option holders in the merger, as well as expenses of the transaction, through a combination of cash on hand, if any, and by drawing on its existing revolving credit facility. Reliance has obtained all necessary consents or waivers required by its lenders to complete the merger. Availability of financing is not a condition precedent to Reliance’s obligation to effect the merger.
Conditions to Closing (page 85)
      The completion of the merger depends on the satisfaction or waiver of a number of conditions, including the following:
  •  adoption and approval of the merger agreement by holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of EMJ common stock;
 
  •  expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period (or any extension) under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, or the HSR Act, and related rules;

11


Table of Contents

  •  the receipt of all other governmental agency consents, approvals, permits, orders and authorizations required to complete the merger other than those which if not made or obtained would not render the merger illegal;
 
  •  the absence of any legal prohibitions against the merger;
 
  •  the approval for listing on the New York Stock Exchange of the shares of Reliance common stock to be issued pursuant to the merger agreement;
 
  •  EMJ’s and Reliance’s representations and warranties being true and correct as of the date of the completion of the merger, except where the failure of such representations and warranties to be true and correct, individually or in the aggregate, has not had and would not have a material adverse effect;
 
  •  the performance by each of EMJ and Reliance of its agreements, covenants and obligations under the merger agreement, in all material respects; and
 
  •  the absence of a material adverse effect on EMJ or Reliance.
Termination of the Merger Agreement (page 82)
      EMJ, Reliance and RSAC may mutually agree in writing to terminate the merger agreement at any time before completing the merger, even after EMJ’s stockholders have adopted it. The merger agreement may also be terminated at any time prior to the effective time of the merger under specified circumstances, including:
  •  by either EMJ or Reliance, if the merger is not completed by June 2, 2006, unless the failure is the result of a willful and material breach of the merger agreement by the party seeking to terminate the merger agreement;
 
  •  by either EMJ or Reliance, if any governmental entity issues a final order preventing the merger;
 
  •  by either EMJ or Reliance, if EMJ stockholders fail to adopt the merger agreement at the special meeting;
 
  •  by either EMJ or Reliance, if the other party to the merger agreement has breached or failed to perform in any material respect any of its representations, warranties or covenants, the breach would give rise to a failure of a condition to the terminating party’s obligation to close, and the breach cannot be or has not been cured within 30 days of written notice of such breach to the non-breaching party;
 
  •  by Reliance, if EMJ’s board of directors has (1) withdrawn or adversely modified its recommendation of the merger agreement or the merger or (2) recommended to EMJ stockholders any takeover proposal (as described in the section entitled “The Merger Agreement — No Solicitation” beginning on page 80 of this proxy statement/ prospectus) other than the merger; or
 
  •  by EMJ or Reliance, if EMJ has determined to accept a superior proposal (as described in the section entitled “The Merger Agreement — No Solicitation” beginning on page 80 of this proxy statement/ prospectus).
Termination Fees to Be Paid by EMJ (page 83)
      EMJ has agreed to pay Reliance a termination fee of approximately $20.5 million if Reliance terminates the merger agreement as the result of:
  •  EMJ’s board of directors (1) withdrawing or adversely modifying its recommendation to EMJ stockholders to adopt the merger agreement and the merger or (2) recommending a takeover proposal other than the merger; or
 
  •  EMJ’s board of directors accepting a superior proposal.

12


Table of Contents

EMJ Prohibited From Soliciting Other Offers (page 80)
      Except in connection with the exercise by EMJ’s board of directors of its fiduciary duties, the merger agreement provides that EMJ will not, and will not permit its directors, officers, employees or other representatives and agents to:
  •  solicit, initiate, negotiate, knowingly encourage or knowingly facilitate the submission of any takeover proposal;
 
  •  enter into any agreement with respect to any takeover proposal; or
 
  •  participate in any discussions or negotiations regarding, or furnish to any person any information with respect to, or take any other action to facilitate any inquiries or the making of any proposal that constitutes, or may reasonably be expected to lead to, any takeover proposal.
      Any violation of these solicitation restrictions may result in Reliance having the ability to terminate the merger agreement and receive termination fees as described below. However, prior to the special meeting, if EMJ receives an unsolicited bona fide written takeover proposal by a third party that EMJ’s board of directors determines in good faith, after receiving advice of its outside legal counsel and financial advisor, to be or to reasonably be expected to lead to a superior proposal, EMJ is permitted, subject to additional limitations, to furnish information about its business to the third party, engage in discussions and negotiations with the third party and take and disclose to EMJ’s stockholders a position with respect to the takeover proposal.
Restrictions on Sale of Shares by Affiliates of EMJ and Reliance (page 73)
      All shares of Reliance common stock that you receive in connection with the merger will be freely transferable unless you are considered an “affiliate” of either EMJ or Reliance for the purposes of the Securities Act at the time the merger agreement is submitted to EMJ stockholders for adoption and approval, in which case you will be permitted to sell the shares of Reliance common stock that you receive in the merger only pursuant to an effective registration statement or an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act. This proxy statement/ prospectus does not register the resale of stock held by affiliates, and the merger agreement does not obligate Reliance to file a registration statement for this purpose.
      Reliance entered into the registration rights agreement with the Kelso Funds pursuant to which Reliance will, within ten days of the closing of the merger, prepare and file a registration statement under the Securities Act at Reliance’s expense, covering all or a portion of the shares of Reliance common stock that the Kelso Funds receive in the merger. Pursuant to the registration rights agreement, Reliance will also provide the Kelso Funds with certain demand and piggyback registration rights with respect to the shares of Reliance common stock received by the Kelso Funds in the merger.
Regulatory Matters Relating to the Merger (page 72)
      Under the HSR Act, the merger cannot be completed until the expiration or earlier termination of a waiting period that follows the filing of notification forms by both parties to the merger with the Federal Trade Commission and the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice. Reliance and EMJ submitted their respective notification and report forms on January 20, 2006. The waiting period will expire on February 21, 2006, unless terminated early or additional information is requested. Reliance and EMJ expect that the requirements of the HSR Act may be satisfied so that the merger can be completed as early as the second quarter of 2006.
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences (page 87)
      In order for the merger to occur, Reliance must receive an opinion from Lord, Bissell & Brook LLP, tax counsel to Reliance, and EMJ must receive an opinion from Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, tax counsel to EMJ, to the effect that, based upon current law and certain other customary assumptions, the

13


Table of Contents

merger will qualify as a tax-deferred “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code. If the merger qualifies as a tax-deferred “reorganization,” for U.S. federal income tax purposes, (1) EMJ generally will not recognize gain or loss as a result of the merger and (2) EMJ stockholders generally will not recognize gain or loss as a result of the merger except to the extent of (a) cash received by them in exchange for their shares of EMJ common stock and (b) cash received by them in lieu of fractional Reliance common shares. You may, however, recognize a taxable gain or loss when you dispose of any Reliance common shares that you receive as a result of the merger. The tax opinions of Lord, Bissell & Brook LLP, and Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP are subject to certain assumptions and qualifications, including but not limited to the accuracy of certain factual representations made by Reliance and EMJ. These tax opinions are not binding on the Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, or any court and do not preclude the IRS or any court from adopting a contrary position. The federal income tax consequences described in this proxy statement/ prospectus may not apply to all EMJ stockholders. Your tax consequences will depend on your own situation. You are urged to consult your tax advisor so as to fully understand the tax consequences of the merger to you.
Accounting Treatment (page 73)
      The merger will be accounted for using the purchase method of accounting in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles.
Appraisal Rights for EMJ Stockholders (page 114)
      Under Delaware law, if you do not vote for adoption of the merger agreement and you comply with other statutory requirements of the Delaware General Corporation Law, you may elect to receive, in cash, the judicially determined fair value of your shares of stock in lieu of the merger consideration provided for under the merger agreement.
      Merely voting against the merger will not protect your rights to an appraisal, which requires completion of all the steps provided under Delaware law. The requirements under Delaware law for exercising appraisal rights are described in the section entitled “Appraisal Rights for EMJ Stockholders” beginning on page 114 of this proxy statement/ prospectus. The relevant section of Delaware law regarding appraisal rights is reproduced and attached as Annex E to this proxy statement/ prospectus.
      If you vote for the adoption and approval of the merger agreement, you will waive your rights to seek appraisal of your shares of EMJ common stock under Delaware law.
Comparative Market Prices and Dividends (page 25)
      Both Reliance and EMJ common stock trade on the New York Stock Exchange. Reliance is listed under the trading symbol “RS” and EMJ is listed under the trading symbol “JOR.” On January 17, 2006, the last trading day before the public announcement of the signing of the merger agreement, Reliance common stock closed at $65.75 per share and EMJ common stock closed at $10.43 per share.
      On February 3, 2006, the most recent practicable date prior to the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus, Reliance common stock closed at $81.57 per share and EMJ common stock closed at $13.94 per share.
Surrender of EMJ Stock Certificates (page 77)
      Following the effective time of the merger, a letter of transmittal will be mailed by the exchange/paying agent to all holders of EMJ common stock containing instructions for surrendering their certificates. Certificates should not be surrendered until the letter of transmittal is received, fully completed, and returned as instructed in the letter of transmittal.

14


Table of Contents

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA OF RELIANCE
      The selected consolidated historical financial and other data for Reliance set forth below as of and for the five years ended December 31, 2004 are derived from Reliance’s consolidated financial statements, which have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm. The selected consolidated historical financial and other data set forth below as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2005 are derived from Reliance’s unaudited consolidated financial statements. The results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the full year or any other interim period. Reliance management prepared the unaudited information on the same basis as it prepared Reliance’s audited consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of Reliance management, this information reflects all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of this data for those dates. The consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
      When you read this selected historical financial data, it is important that you read it in conjunction with, and it is qualified by reference to, the historical financial statements and related notes and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Reliance’s annual report on Form 10-K for 2004 and September 30, 2005 quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC and incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus. See the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” on page 117.
                                                           
    Year Ended December 31,   Nine Months Ended
         
    2004   2003   2002   2001   2000   9/30/05   9/30/04
                             
    (In thousands, except per share data)
Income Statement Data:(1)
                                                       
Net sales
  $ 2,943,034     $ 1,882,933     $ 1,745,005     $ 1,656,974     $ 1,726,665     $ 2,498,373     $ 2,200,215  
Cost of sales
    2,110,848       1,372,310       1,268,251       1,194,512       1,256,997       1,831,474       1,569,396  
                                           
Gross profit
    832,186       510,623       476,754       462,462       469,668       666,899       630,819  
Operating expenses(2)
    525,306       430,493       406,479       371,006       339,319       407,039       391,009  
                                           
Operating profit
    306,880       80,130       70,275       91,456       130,349       259,860       239,810  
Other income (expense):
                                                       
 
Interest expense
    (28,690 )     (26,745 )     (22,605 )     (26,738 )     (26,068 )     (19,290 )     (21,816 )
 
Other income, net
    4,168       2,837       3,266       3,796       3,410       2,709       2,376  
 
Amortization expense(3)
    (3,208 )     (2,304 )     (1,355 )     (8,641 )     (7,411 )     (3,380 )     (2,413 )
Equity earnings of 50%-owned company
                263       286       2,307              
Minority interest
    (9,182 )     938       (124 )                 (6,271 )     (8,898 )
                                           
Income before income taxes
    269,968       54,856       49,720       60,159       102,587       233,628       209,059  
Provision for income taxes
    (100,240 )     (20,846 )     (19,553 )     (23,823 )     (40,268 )     (88,779 )     (82,283 )
                                           
Net income
  $ 169,728     $ 34,010     $ 30,167     $ 36,336     $ 62,319     $ 144,849     $ 126,776  
                                           
Earnings per Share:
                                                       
Income from continuing operations — diluted
  $ 5.19     $ 1.07     $ 0.95     $ 1.28     $ 2.28     $ 4.38     $ 3.88  
Income from continuing operations — basic
  $ 5.23     $ 1.07     $ 0.95     $ 1.28     $ 2.29     $ 4.40     $ 3.91  
Weighted average common shares outstanding — diluted
    32,675       31,866       31,799       28,470       27,289       33,063       32,641  
Weighted average common shares outstanding — basic
    32,480       31,853       31,687       28,336       27,215       32,889       32,429  

15


Table of Contents

                                                         
    Year Ended December 31,   Nine Months Ended
         
    2004   2003   2002   2001   2000   9/30/05   9/30/04
                             
    (In thousands, except per share data)
Other Data:
                                                       
EBITDA(4)
  $ 343,285     $ 118,471     $ 100,871     $ 119,234     $ 156,747     $ 287,724     $ 264,021  
Cash flow from operations
    121,768       107,820       90,638       104,038       25,803       165,168       31,170  
Capital expenditures
    35,982       20,909       18,658       24,539       30,379       34,314       27,695  
Cash dividends per share
    0.26       0.24       0.24       0.24       0.22       0.28       0.19  
                                                         
    As of December 31,   As of September 30,
         
    2004   2003   2002   2001   2000   2005   2004
                             
    (In thousands)
Balance Sheet Data:
                                                       
Working capital
  $ 444,449     $ 341,762     $ 390,201     $ 379,669     $ 347,659     $ 510,454     $ 478,849  
Total assets
    1,563,331       1,369,424       1,139,758       1,082,502       997,243       1,728,216       1,604,600  
Long-term debt
    380,850       469,250       344,080       331,975       421,825       370,817       478,850  
Shareholders’ equity
    822,552       647,619       610,435       583,561       403,039       967,501       777,882  
 
(1)  Does not include financial results of American Steel, L.L.C. for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001 and the period January 1, 2002 to April 30, 2002 because Reliance accounted for its 50% investment by the equity method, and therefore Reliance excluded 50% of American Steel’s earnings from its net income and earnings per share amounts. Effective May 1, 2002, Reliance began consolidating American Steel’s financial results due to an amendment to American Steel’s operating agreement, which gave Reliance 50.5% of the ownership units and eliminated all super- majority and unanimous voting rights, among other changes.
 
(2)  Operating expenses include warehouse, delivery, selling, general and administrative expenses and depreciation expense.
 
(3)  Amortization expense included the amortization expense related to goodwill in the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001.
 
(4)  EBITDA is defined as the sum of income before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation expense and amortization of intangibles (including goodwill). We believe that EBITDA is commonly used as a measure of performance for companies in our industry and is frequently used by analysts, investors, lenders and other interested parties to evaluate a company’s financial performance and its ability to incur and service debt while providing useful information. EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for consolidated statements of income and cash flows data prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and should not be construed as an indication of a company’s operating performance or as a measure of liquidity. EBITDA as measured in this proxy statement/ prospectus is not necessarily comparable with similarly titled measures for other companies.
EBITDA Reconciliation:
                                                         
    Year Ended December 31,   Nine Months Ended
         
    2004   2003   2002   2001   2000   9/30/05   9/30/04
                             
    (In thousands)
Income before income taxes
  $ 269,968     $ 54,856     $ 49,720     $ 60,159     $ 102,587     $ 233,628     $ 209,059  
Interest expense
    28,690       26,745       22,605       26,738       26,068       19,290       21,816  
Depreciation and amortization expense
    44,627       36,870       28,546       32,337       28,092       34,806       33,146  
                                           
EBITDA
  $ 343,285     $ 118,471     $ 100,871     $ 119,234     $ 156,747     $ 287,724     $ 264,021  
                                           

16


Table of Contents

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA OF EMJ
      The selected consolidated historical financial and other data for EMJ set forth below as of and for the five years ended March 31, 2005 are derived from EMJ’s consolidated financial statements which have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm. The selected consolidated historical financial and other data set forth below as of and for the six months ended September 29, 2004 and September 28, 2005 are derived from EMJ’s unaudited consolidated financial statements. The results of operations for the six months ended September 28, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the full year or any other interim period. EMJ management prepared the unaudited information on the same basis as it prepared EMJ’s audited consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of EMJ management, this information reflects all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of this data for those dates. The consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
      When you read this selected historical financial data, it is important that you read it in conjunction with, and it is qualified by reference to, the historical financial statements and related notes and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in EMJ’s annual report on Form 10-K for 2005 and September 28, 2005 quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC, and incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus. See the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” on page 117.
                                                           
    Year Ended March 31,   Six Months Ended
         
    2005   2004   2003   2002   2001   9/28/05   9/29/04
                             
    (In thousands, except per share data)
Statement of Operations Data:
                                                       
Revenues
  $ 1,608,890     $ 1,040,367     $ 919,927     $ 895,058     $ 1,059,681     $ 856,888     $ 750,907  
Costs of goods sold
    1,184,871       754,266       658,562       641,991       767,263       637,356       534,803  
                                           
Gross profit
    424,019       286,101       261,365       253,067       292,418       219,532       216,104  
Expenses(1)
    289,318       216,609       210,250       204,684       228,498       130,967       128,745  
                                           
Income from operations
    134,701       69,492       51,115       48,383       63,920       88,565       87,359  
Net interest expense(2)
    75,760       89,927       82,486       72,433       69,951       27,488       47,874  
Income tax expense (benefit) (3)
    (38,562 )     3,127       1,500       455       1,223       19,617       5,930  
                                           
Net income(loss)
  $ 97,503     $ (23,562 )   $ (32,871 )   $ (24,505 )   $ (7,254 )   $ 41,460     $ 33,555  
                                           
Net income(loss) available to common stockholders(3)(4)
  $ 91,993     $ (34,190 )   $ (42,601 )   $ (34,402 )   $ (15,438 )   $ 41,460     $ 28,045  
                                           
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders per share (3)(5)
                                                       
 
Basic
  $ 7.64     $ (2.96 )   $ (3.60 )   $ (2.78 )   $ (1.23 )   $ 0.86     $ 2.46  
 
Diluted
  $ 5.73     $ (2.96 )   $ (3.60 )   $ (2.78 )   $ (1.23 )   $ 0.83     $ 1.81  
Weighted average shares outstanding(5)
                                                       
 
Basic
    12,039       11,555       11,820       12,365       12,548       47,990       11,404  
 
Diluted
    16,042       11,555       11,820       12,365       12,548       49,770       15,466  

17


Table of Contents

                                                           
    Year Ended March 31,   Six Months Ended
         
    2005   2004   2003   2002   2001   9/28/05   9/29/04
                             
    (In thousands, except per share and tonnage data)
Pro forma information (unaudited):
                                                       
Pro forma net income available to common stockholders(6)
  $ 81,896                                                  
Pro forma net income available to common stockholders per share(7)
                                                       
 
Basic
  $ 1.66                                                  
 
Diluted
  $ 1.62                                                  
Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding
                                                       
 
Basic
    49,359                                                  
 
Diluted
    50,428                                                  
Cash Flow Data:
                                                       
Capital expenditures
  $ 22,975     $ 10,530     $ 15,335     $ 24,531     $ 14,475     $ 11,594     $ 14,668  
Purchase of stock, net
    13,158       5,781       10,587       14,963       5,514             124  
Other Data (unaudited):
                                                       
EBITDA(8)
  $ 146,422     $ 80,776     $ 62,484     $ 59,832     $ 74,955     $ 93,907     $ 93,096  
COLI effect(9)
    (861 )     (561 )     (1,752 )     (1,738 )     (2,374 )     (1,796 )     (2,303 )
Revenues per employee(10)
    962       639       539       496       517       498       455  
EBITDA per employee(8)(10)
    88       50       37       33       37       55       56  
Average number of employees
    1,672       1,628       1,706       1,805       2,051       1,720       1,650  
Tons shipped
    769,879       662,213       603,310       581,243       679,610       391,163       386,533  
                                                         
    March 31,   September 28,   September 29,
             
    2005   2004   2003   2002   2001   2005   2005
                             
    (In thousands)
Balance Sheet Data:
                                                       
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 19,994     $ 15,646     $ 45,413     $ 21,372     $ 23,779     $ 8,668     $ 11,592  
Total working capital
    185,759       129,252       165,897       146,800       149,501       252,742       203,257  
Total assets
    658,841       537,191       516,580       444,506       484,625       667,827       661,886  
Total debt(11)
    516,889       535,111       543,077       471,376       420,064       298,738       595,307  
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)
    (186,173 )     (273,295 )     (245,171 )     (202,690 )     (160,197 )     125,303       (239,379 )
 
(1)  Expenses include restructuring charges aggregating $3,320 and $1,861 for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2001 and 2002 in connection with workforce reductions and consolidations and losses from the sale of significant assets in those fiscal years and a special compensation charge of $2,000 in connection with a payment to EMJ’s chief executive officer in fiscal 2001.
 
(2)  Net interest expense includes amortization and write-off of debt issue costs aggregating $1,482, $1,792, $1,416, $1,323, $1,756, $661 and $659 for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and the six months ended September 29, 2004 and September 28, 2005, respectively, net of interest income of $1,179, $164, $394, $159, $40, $14 and $94 for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and the six months ended September 29, 2004 and September 28, 2005, respectively.

18


Table of Contents

(3)  Income taxes for fiscal years 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 primarily represent certain foreign and state taxes on income due to the fact that a valuation allowance was established against deferred tax assets. For fiscal year 2005 EMJ recognized a tax benefit for the reduction of its valuation allowance for deferred tax assets of $56,303. Income taxes for the first six months of fiscal 2006 represent the federal, state and Canadian income taxes.
 
(4)  The adjustments to net income (loss) are approximately $(8,184), $(9,897), $(9,730), $(10,628), $(5,510), $(5,510) and $0 for fiscal years 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and the six months ended September 29, 2004 and September 28, 2005, respectively. The adjustments consist of dividends accrued for the Earle M. Jorgensen Holding Company, Inc., or Holding, series A preferred stock and dividends declared and paid-in-kind for the Holding series B preferred stock.
 
(5)  The basic and diluted per share information is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for each reported period. The computation of diluted per share information includes the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents for outstanding options and warrants exercisable for shares of common stock using the treasury stock method. Upon completion of the merger and financial restructuring in April 2005 all shares of Holding common stock were converted to shares of EMJ common stock. The inclusion of common stock equivalents for all periods presented prior to the year ended March 31, 2005 was antidilutive.
 
(6)  The adjustments to pro forma net income available to common stockholders include $(21,442) relating to the interest on the Holding notes, $37,049 income tax benefit related to Holding and $(5,510) dividends declared and paid-in-kind for the Holding series B preferred stock.
  Reconciliation of historical net income available to common stockholders of EMJ to reported income (loss) available to common stockholders after giving effect to the merger and financial restructuring on April 20, 2005 is as follows:
           
    Year Ended
    March 31, 2005
     
    (in thousands)
Historical net income of EMJ
  $ 81,896  
Adjustments for the effect of the merger and financial restructuring:
       
 
Interest on subordinated debt, net
    (21,442 )
 
Preferred dividends
    (5,510 )
 
Tax benefit
    37,049  
       
Reported net income (loss) available to common stockholders after giving effect to the merger and financial restructuring
  $ 91,993  
       
(7)  The adjustments to pro forma basic per share information reflects per share information as discussed in note 5, above, and shares of EMJ common stock issued upon completion of the merger and financial restructuring and initial public offering as follows: 12,997,890 shares for the Holding notes; 2,377,358 shares for the Holding series A preferred stock; 1,409,751 shares for the Holding series B preferred stock; 2,934,977 shares for the Holding warrants; 12,038,898 weighted average shares for the Holding common stock converted one to one in the merger and financial restructuring to EMJ common stock; and 17,600,000 shares issued in the initial public offering. The computation of pro forma diluted per share information includes the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents for outstanding options exercisable for shares of common stock.

19


Table of Contents

  Change in shares from giving effect to the merger and financial restructuring and the initial public offering:
           
    Year Ended
    March 31, 2005
     
    (In thousands,
    except per
    share data)
Holding common shares converted to EMJ common shares one-to-one
    11,197  
Exchange consideration for debt and equity securities
    19,720  
Initial public offering shares issued
    17,600  
       
Total shares outstanding at end of period if merger and financial restructuring and initial public offering happened during the period
    48,517  
       
Pro forma earnings per share based on historical net income of EMJ
       
 
Basic
  $ 1.66  
 
Diluted
  $ 1.62  
Pro forma weighted outstanding shares
       
 
Basic
    49,359  
 
Diluted
    50,428  
(8)  “EBITDA” represents net income before net interest expense, provision for income taxes and depreciation and amortization. Consistent with Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, EMJ’s EBITDA has not been adjusted to exclude any other non-cash charges or liabilities, such as LIFO (last-in-first-out) adjustments of $887, $590, $(3,354), $14,343, $74,164, $24,405 and $7,772 and postretirement benefits aggregating $11, $249, $498, $619, $822, $401 and $424 for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and the six months ended September 29, 2004 and September 28, 2005, respectively. In addition, EMJ’s EBITDA has not been adjusted for the following items: provisions for workforce reductions and consolidations and losses from the sale of significant assets aggregating $3,320 and $1,861 for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2001 and 2002, respectively; special compensation of $2,000 payable to EMJ’s chief executive officer in fiscal 2001; excise tax of $1,919 related to an IRS settlement in fiscal 2002; and a loss of $12,278 related to early retirement of debt in fiscal 2003. EMJ believes EBITDA is useful to investors because it is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties in the evaluation of company performance in the industry. EMJ’s management believes that EBITDA is useful in evaluating EMJ’s operating performance between periods and compared to that of EMJ’s competitors because the calculation of EBITDA generally eliminates the effects of financing and income taxes and the accounting effects of capital spending and acquisitions, which items may vary between periods and for different companies for reasons unrelated to overall operating performance. As a result, EMJ’s management uses EBITDA as a significant component when measuring EMJ’s performance in connection with determining incentive compensation. EBITDA is not a recognized measure of operating income, financial performance or liquidity under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The items excluded from EBITDA are significant components in understanding and assessing financial performance. Therefore, while providing useful information, EMJ’s EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for consolidated statement of operations and cash flow data prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and should not be construed as an indication of a company’s operating performance or as a measure of liquidity. In addition, it should be noted that companies calculate EBITDA differently and, therefore, EBITDA as presented for EMJ may not be comparable to EBITDA reported by other companies. A reconciliation of net income to EBITDA for each of the respective periods indicated is as follows:
                                                           
    Year Ended March 31,   Six Months Ended
         
    2005   2004   2003   2002   2001   9/28/05   9/29/04
                             
    (In thousands)
Reconciliation of EBITDA:
                                                       
Net income
  $ 97,503     $ (23,562 )   $ (32,871 )   $ (24,505 )   $ (7,254 )   $ 41,460     $ 33,555  
Depreciation and amortization
    11,721       11,284       11,369       11,449       11,035       5,342       5,737  
Net interest expense
    75,760       89,927       82,486       72,433       69,951       27,488       47,874  
Provision for income taxes
    (38,562 )     3,127       1,500       455       1,223       19,617       5,930  
                                           
 
EBITDA
  $ 146,422     $ 80,776     $ 62,484     $ 59,832     $ 74,955     $ 93,907     $ 93,096  
                                           
(9)  EMJ is the owner and beneficiary of life insurance policies, or the COLI policies, on (1) all former non-union employees of a predecessor company, including certain current employees of EMJ, and (2) key man life

20


Table of Contents

insurance policies on certain current and former executives of EMJ. The effect of these company owned life insurance policies on EMJ’s pre-tax income consists of premium expense, policy dividend growth, and proceeds (death benefits) (which are reported as general and administrative expense) and policy interest expense on policy borrowings (which is reported as a component of interest expense). Under current U.S. federal tax law, the policy dividend growth is not currently taxable, the premium is non-deductible, the proceeds (death benefits) are tax exempt and the interest is deductible up to 96% of the contract rate.
                                                           
    Year Ended March 31,   Six Months Ended
         
    2005   2004   2003   2002   2001   9/28/05   9/29/04
                             
    (In thousands)
Calculation of COLI effect:
                                                       
Cash surrender value-policy dividend growth
  $ 22,200     $ 17,751     $ 17,156     $ 13,521     $ 13,010     $ 9,231     $ 9,940  
Cash surrender value-insurance premiums
    (3,661 )     (3,081 )     (2,866 )     (2,325 )     (2,217 )     (2,061 )     (1,808 )
Proceeds (death benefits)
    2,967       4,851       1,754       3,062       1,230       3,057       318  
                                           
Total operating income impact of COLI
    21,506       19,521       16,044       14,258       12,023       10,227       8,450  
Cash surrender value-interest
    (22,367 )     (20,082 )     (17,796 )     (15,996 )     (14,397 )     (12,023 )     (10,753 )
                                           
 
Total pre-tax income impact of COLI
  $ (861 )   $ (561 )   $ (1,752 )   $ (1,738 )   $ (2,374 )   $ (1,796 )   $ (2,303 )
                                           
(10)  Calculated based on the average number of employees during the applicable period.
 
(11)  Long-term debt includes $149,880, $178,481, $212,540, $225,373, $245,882, $245,882 and $0 for fiscal 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and the six months ended September 29, 2004 and September 28, 2005, respectively, related to the Variable Rate Senior Notes paid in cash and shares of EMJ common stock upon completion of EMJ’s initial public offering on April 20, 2005.

21


Table of Contents

SELECTED UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL DATA
      The following selected unaudited pro forma combined financial data has been derived from and should be read together with the unaudited pro forma combined financial statements and related notes on pages 93 through 99 of this proxy statement/ prospectus. This information is based on the historical consolidated balance sheets and related historical consolidated statements of income of Reliance and EMJ, giving effect to the merger using the purchase method of accounting. The unaudited pro forma balance sheet as of September 30, 2005 assumes that the merger occurred as of that date. The unaudited pro forma statements of income for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2004 reflect the merger as if it had occurred as of January 1 of each respective period.
      This information is for illustrative purposes only. Reliance and EMJ may have performed differently had they always been combined. You should not rely on the selected unaudited pro forma combined financial data as being indicative of the historical results that would have been achieved had the companies always been combined or the future results that Reliance will experience after the merger.
                 
        Twelve Months
    Nine Months Ended   Ended
    September 30,   December 31,
    2005   2004
         
    (In millions, except per share amounts)
Net sales
  $ 3,811.6     $ 4,417.7  
Income before income taxes
    287.1       316.1  
Net income from continuing operations(1)
    178.0       187.5  
Earnings per common share from continuing operations — diluted
  $ 4.72     $ 5.02  
Earnings per common share from continuing operations — basic
  $ 4.74     $ 5.05  
 
(1)  The twelve months ended December 31, 2004 amount is net of $8.5 million of preferred dividends.
         
    September 30,
    2005
     
    (In millions)
Total assets
  $ 3,148.9  
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations (less current portions)
    1,079.3  

22


Table of Contents

COMPARATIVE UNAUDITED PER SHARE DATA
      Set forth below are net income, cash dividends and book value per Reliance share and EMJ share on a historical basis, for Reliance on a pro forma combined basis per share, and for Reliance and on a pro forma combined basis per EMJ-equivalent share. The assumed exchange ratio is 0.0928 Reliance shares for each EMJ share calculated by dividing $6.50 by the average closing prices of Reliance common stock during the 20-day period ended January 31, 2006 ($70.01). You should note that this exchange ratio, and thus the amount of Reliance common stock to be issued in the merger, may increase or decrease depending on the average closing prices of Reliance common stock for the pricing period prior to the effective time of the merger.
      The Reliance pro forma combined data was derived by combining the historical consolidated financial information of Reliance and the historical consolidated financial information of EMJ using the purchase method of accounting for business combinations as described under “Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Information” beginning on page 93.
      The Reliance pro forma combined data per EMJ-equivalent common share shows the effect of the merger from the perspective of an EMJ stockholder. The information was computed by multiplying the Reliance pro forma combined earnings per share, cash dividends and book value by the assumed exchange ratio of 0.0928.
      You should read the information below together with the historical financial statements and related notes contained in the annual reports and quarterly reports that EMJ and Reliance have filed with the SEC and have incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus. See “Where You Can Find More Information” on page 117. The unaudited pro forma combined data below is for illustrative purposes only and is based on available information and assumptions that are believed to be reasonable as of the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus. The financial results may have been different had the companies always been combined due to, among other factors, those factors discussed under “Risk Factors” beginning on page 30. You should not rely on this information as being indicative of the historical results that would have been achieved had the companies always been combined or the future results that Reliance will

23


Table of Contents

experience after the merger. See “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” beginning on page 28.
                   
        As of and for the
    As of and for the   Twelve Months
    Nine Months Ended,   Ended,
    September 30, 2005   December 31, 2004
         
Reliance historical per common share data:
               
 
Earnings per common share from continuing operations — diluted
  $ 4.38     $ 5.19  
 
Earnings per common share from continuing operations — basic
    4.40       5.23  
 
Cash dividends per common share
    .28       .26  
 
Book value per common share at end of period(1)
    29.33       25.18  
EMJ historical per common share data:
               
 
Earnings per common share from continuing operations — diluted
  $ 2.55     $ 1.68  
 
Earnings per common share from continuing operations — basic
    2.73       2.27  
 
Cash dividends per common share
           
 
Book value per common share at end of period(2)
    2.49       (21.43 )
Reliance pro forma per Reliance common share combined data:
               
 
Earnings per common share from continuing operations — diluted
  $ 4.72     $ 5.02  
 
Earnings per common share from continuing operations — basic
    4.74       5.05  
 
Cash dividends per common share
    .28       .26  
 
Book value per common share at end of period(3)
    34.37          
Reliance pro forma per EMJ-equivalent common share combined data:(4)
               
 
Earnings per common share from continuing operations — diluted
  $ 0.44     $ 0.47  
 
Earnings per common share from continuing operations — basic
    0.44       0.47  
 
Cash dividends per common share
    0.03       0.02  
 
Book value per common share at end of period
    3.19          
 
(1)  The historical book value per share is computed by dividing shareholders’ equity by the number of common shares outstanding at the end of each period presented.
 
(2)  The historical book value per share is computed by dividing stockholders’ equity by the number of common shares outstanding at the end of each period presented.
 
(3)  The pro forma combined book value per share is computed by dividing pro forma stockholders’ equity by the pro forma number of shares outstanding at the end of the period, assuming the issuance of 4,662,002 Reliance common shares in the merger.
 
(4)  The equivalent pro forma per share information is computed assuming an exchange ratio of 0.0928 Reliance common share per common share of EMJ. This exchange ratio does not take into consideration the cash portion of the merger consideration of $6.50 per share.

24


Table of Contents

COMPARATIVE MARKET PRICES AND DIVIDENDS
Comparative Market Prices
Reliance
      Reliance common stock is listed on the NYSE and traded under the symbol “RS.” The following table sets forth, for the calendar quarters indicated, the high and low reported trading prices per share of Reliance common stock on the NYSE Composite Transactions reporting system based on closing prices and cash dividends declared per share of Reliance common stock.
                         
    Stock Price    
         
Calendar Year   High   Low   Dividends
             
2006
                       
First Quarter (through February 3, 2006)
  $ 82.79     $ 62.90     $  
2005
                       
Fourth Quarter
    66.64       49.15       0.10  
Third Quarter
    52.93       37.52       0.10  
Second Quarter
    43.62       35.04       0.09  
First Quarter
    47.36       36.29       0.09  
2004
                       
Fourth Quarter
    41.90       33.72       0.07  
Third Quarter
    41.89       36.33       0.07  
Second Quarter
    40.32       31.96       0.06  
First Quarter
    35.95       27.39       0.06  
      On January 17, 2006, the last full trading day before the public announcement of the merger agreement, the high and low sales prices of shares of Reliance common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange were $66.12 and $64.84, respectively. On February 3, 2006, the last full trading day before the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus, the high and low sale prices of shares of Reliance common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange were $82.99 and $81.12, respectively.
EMJ
      EMJ closed its initial public offering of 17.6 million shares of EMJ common stock on April 20, 2005. All of the shares were sold by EMJ. EMJ’s common stock began trading on the New York Stock Exchange on April 15, 2005, under the ticker symbol “JOR.” The following table sets forth, for the calendar quarters indicated, the high and low reported trading prices per EMJ share on the NYSE Composite Transactions reporting system based on closing prices and cash dividends declared per EMJ share.
                         
    Stock Price    
         
Calendar Year   High   Low   Dividends
             
2006
                       
First Quarter (through February 3, 2006)
  $ 14.08     $ 9.80     $  
2005
                       
Fourth Quarter
    10.11       8.24        
Third Quarter
    10.69       8.08        
Second Quarter (beginning April 15, 2005)
    9.20       6.70        
      On January 17, 2006, the last full trading day before the public announcement of the merger agreement, the high and low sales prices of shares of EMJ common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange were $10.49 and $10.19, respectively. On February 3, 2006, the last full trading day before

25


Table of Contents

the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus, the high and low sale prices of shares of EMJ common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange were $14.12 and $13.82, respectively.
      Reliance shareholders and EMJ stockholders are advised to obtain current market quotations for Reliance common stock and EMJ common stock. The market price of Reliance common stock and EMJ common stock will fluctuate between the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus and the completion of the merger. No assurance can be given concerning the market price of (1) Reliance common stock before or after the effective date of the merger or (2) EMJ common stock before the effective date of the merger.
EMJ Equivalent Per Share Price
      On January 17, 2006, the last full trading day before the public announcement of the merger agreement, and                     , 2006, the last full trading day before the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus, the equivalent price per share of EMJ common stock was $13.00 and $          , respectively. The equivalent price per share of EMJ common stock is equal to the value of Reliance common stock that an EMJ stockholder would have received for one share of EMJ common stock if the merger had taken place on those dates. We calculated these equivalent numbers by multiplying the closing market price per share of Reliance common stock on these dates by an assumed exchange ratio of 0.1026 and           , respectively, and adding the per share cash payment of $6.50. We have based these assumed exchange ratios on the average closing price of Reliance common stock on the New York Stock Exchange during the 20 consecutive trading days ended January 12, 2006 and January 31, 2006, respectively. You should note that this exchange ratio may decrease or increase depending on the average closing prices of Reliance common stock during the pricing period prior to the merger and the actual value of Reliance common stock that an EMJ stockholder will receive upon completion of the merger may be higher or lower than the prices above. As a result, you should obtain current market quotations for Reliance common stock and EMJ common stock before making any decision about the merger.
Dividends
Reliance
      Reliance has paid quarterly cash dividends on its common stock for 46 years. Reliance’s board of directors has increased the quarterly dividend rate on a periodic basis. The Reliance board of directors may reconsider or revise this policy from time to time based on conditions then existing, including Reliance’s earnings, cash flows, financial condition and capital requirements or other factors the Reliance board of directors may deem relevant. Reliance expects to continue to declare and pay dividends in the future, if earnings are available to pay dividends, but Reliance also intends to continue to retain a portion of earnings for reinvestment in its operations and expansion of its business. There can be no assurance that either cash or stock dividends will be paid in the future or that, if paid, the dividends will be in the same amount or with the same frequency as paid in the past.
      The private placement debt agreements for Reliance’s senior notes and Reliance’s syndicated credit facility contain covenants which, among other things, require Reliance to maintain a minimum net worth and limit cash dividends based upon Reliance’s earnings, restricting its ability to pay dividends. Since Reliance’s initial public offering in September 1994 through December 31, 2004, Reliance has paid between 5% and 25% of earnings to its shareholders as dividends. In July 2004, Reliance increased the dividend by 17% to $.07 per share, and, in February 2005, Reliance increased its dividend by 29% to $.09 per share, for a total increase of 67% since June 2004.
EMJ
      EMJ has not paid any dividends since its initial public offering in April 2005 and has no plans to pay cash dividends on its common stock in the foreseeable future. In addition, EMJ’s domestic credit facility prohibits EMJ from paying, and the indenture for EMJ’s 93/4% senior secured notes, or the 93/4% notes, limits EMJ’s ability to pay,

26


Table of Contents

dividends. Prior to EMJ’s initial public offering, EMJ had not paid a stock dividend since its formation on May 3, 1990. Prior to EMJ’s initial offering, EMJ paid cash dividends to its former parent Holding only in connection with specific obligations of Holding from time to time, including, (1) the payment of interest on indebtedness of Holding, (2) the repurchase of Holding’s capital stock from employees of EMJ whose employment had terminated, as required under the terms of Holding’s stockholders agreement (which terminated upon completion of EMJ’s merger and financial restructuring and EMJ’s initial public offering), and EMJ’s stock bonus plan (predecessor to the retirement savings plan), and (3) redemption of stock options from Mr. Nelson, EMJ’s chief executive officer, and a terminated employee.
      Following the merger, the former holders of EMJ common stock will be entitled to receive dividends in respect of the shares of Reliance common stock they receive as merger consideration as may be declared by Reliance’s board of directors.

27


Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
      The statements contained or incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements as defined in the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as “believe,” “estimate,” “intend,” “may,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “predict,” “project,” “counting on,” “plan,” “continue,” “want,” “forecast,” “should,” “would,” “is confident” and “will” and similar expressions as they relate to Reliance or EMJ are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Except to the extent required by federal securities laws, neither Reliance nor EMJ undertakes any obligation to publicly release the result of any revisions to any such forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
      All forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations, including, but not limited to, the following:
  •  Expected cost savings from the merger may not be fully realized or realized within the expected time frame, and costs or expenses relating to the merger may be higher than expected;
 
  •  Revenues or margins following the merger may be lower than expected;
 
  •  Costs or difficulties related to obtaining regulatory approvals for and to completing the merger and, following the merger, to the integration of the businesses of Reliance and EMJ may be greater than expected;
 
  •  Synergies and accretion to reported earnings estimated to result from the merger may not be realized and the level of costs and expenses incurred by Reliance in connection with the merger may be higher than expected;
 
  •  Reliance’s future operating results depend on a number of factors beyond its control, such as the prices for and the availability of metals, which could cause its results to fluctuate significantly over time. During periods of low customer demand, it could be more difficult for Reliance to pass through price increases to its customers, which could reduce its gross profit and net income;
 
  •  Changes in demand for the products that Reliance sells can cause significant fluctuations in both availability and cost of the products. A significant or rapid increase or decrease in costs from current levels could have a severe negative impact on Reliance’s gross profit;
 
  •  Foreign currency exchange rates could change, which could affect the price Reliance pays for metals and the results of its foreign operations;
 
  •  Reliance services industries that are highly cyclical, and any downturn in its customers’ industries could reduce its revenue and profitability;
 
  •  The success of Reliance’s business is affected by general economic conditions and, accordingly, its business was adversely impacted by the economic slowdown or recession in 2003, 2002 and 2001. This could occur in future periods;
 
  •  Reliance’s business is very competitive and increased competition could reduce gross profit margins and net income;
 
  •  As a decentralized business, Reliance depends on both senior management and its operating employees. If Reliance is unable to attract and retain these individuals, its results of operations may decline;
 
  •  Interest rates on debt could increase; Reliance’s variable rate debt is currently at relatively low historical levels and rates, and it anticipates that these levels will increase materially at closing and rates will continue to increase through 2006;
 
  •  Reliance may not be able to consummate future acquisitions, and those acquisitions that it does complete may be difficult to integrate into its business;

28


Table of Contents

  •  Reliance is subject to various environmental and other governmental regulations which may require it to expend significant capital and incur substantial costs;
 
  •  If existing shareholders sell their shares, the market price of the Reliance common stock could be depressed;
 
  •  Principal shareholders who own a significant number of Reliance’s shares may have interests that conflict with yours;
 
  •  Reliance has implemented a staggered or classified board of directors that may adversely impact your rights as a shareholder;
 
  •  Reliance may discover internal control deficiencies in its decentralized operations or in an acquisition that must be reported in its SEC filings, which may result in a negative reaction by its shareholders that adversely impacts its stock price;
 
  •  Reliance’s acquisitions, including EMJ, might fail to perform as anticipated, which could result in an impairment charge to write off some or all of the goodwill for that entity; and
 
  •  Other economic, business, competitive or regulatory factors may affect Reliance’s and EMJ’s businesses generally as described in Reliance’s and EMJ’s filings with the SEC.
      All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to Reliance or EMJ or persons acting on their behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing. New risks and uncertainties may arise from time to time. We cannot predict these events or how they might impact us. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 30 of this proxy statement/prospectus.

29


Table of Contents

RISK FACTORS
Risks Relating to the Merger
      Because the market price of Reliance common stock may fluctuate, you cannot be certain of the precise value of the merger consideration you will receive in the merger.
      You cannot be certain of the precise value of the consideration to be received as a result of the merger. If the merger is completed, you will be entitled to receive, for each share of EMJ common stock that you own, $6.50 in cash and between 0.0892 and 0.1207 of a share of newly-issued Reliance common stock, depending on the average closing price of Reliance common stock for the pricing period. The exchange ratio will adjust to ensure that the fraction of a share of Reliance common stock you receive will be equal to $6.50 divided by the average closing price of Reliance common stock for the pricing period so long as the average Reliance stock price is equal to or between $72.86 and $53.86. However, the market value of that fraction of a share of Reliance common stock you receive may have a value that is greater or less than $6.50, as the trading price of Reliance common stock on the date of the merger may be greater or less than the average closing price of Reliance common stock for the pricing period used to determine the exchange ratio. If the average closing price of Reliance common stock for the pricing period is less than $53.86, the exchange ratio will no longer adjust upward, and you will receive 0.1207 of a share of Reliance common stock for each share of EMJ common stock that you own. This means that the value of the fraction of a share of Reliance common stock you will receive will be below $6.50 to the extent the market price of Reliance common stock is below $53.86 when the merger is completed. If, however, the average closing price of Reliance common stock for the pricing period is more than $72.86, the exchange ratio will no longer adjust downward, and you will receive 0.0892 of a share of Reliance common stock for each share of EMJ common stock that you own. This means that the value of the fraction of a share of Reliance common stock you will receive will be above $6.50 to the extent the market price of Reliance common stock is above $72.86 when the merger is completed. The formula for calculating the exchange ratio is set forth in the section entitled “The Merger Agreement — Merger Consideration” beginning on page 75 of this proxy statement/ prospectus.
      The prices of EMJ common stock and Reliance common stock at the closing of the merger may vary from their respective prices on the date the merger agreement was signed, on the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus and on the date of the special meeting. For example, (1) during 2005 and 2006 (from April 15, 2005, when it commenced trading on the New York Stock Exchange, through January 17, 2006, the last trading day before the announcement of the merger), the trading prices of EMJ common stock on the New York Stock Exchange ranged from a low closing sale price of $6.70 per share to a high closing sale price of $10.69 per share and (2) during 2004, 2005 and 2006 (through January 17, 2006, the last trading day before the announcement of the merger), the trading prices of Reliance common stock on the New York Stock Exchange ranged from a low closing sale price of $27.39 per share to a high closing sale price of $67.06 per share. These variations may be the result of various factors, including:
  •  changes in the business, operations or prospects of Reliance, EMJ or the combined company;
 
  •  governmental, regulatory and/or litigation developments;
 
  •  market assessments as to whether and when the merger will be completed;
 
  •  the timing of completion of the merger; and
 
  •  general stock market, economic and political conditions.
You are urged to obtain a current market quotation for Reliance common stock.
      EMJ will be subject to business uncertainties and contractual restrictions while the merger is pending.
      Uncertainty about the effect of the merger on employees, customers and suppliers may have an adverse effect on EMJ and consequently on Reliance. These uncertainties may impair EMJ’s ability to retain and motivate key personnel until the merger is completed, and could cause customers, suppliers and

30


Table of Contents

others that deal with EMJ to defer purchases or other decisions affecting EMJ, or to seek to change existing business relationships with EMJ. If key employees depart because of uncertainty about their future roles and the potential complexities of integration, the combined company’s business following the merger could be harmed. In addition, the merger agreement restricts EMJ from making certain acquisitions and taking other specified actions without the consent of Reliance until the merger occurs. These restrictions may prevent EMJ from pursuing attractive business opportunities that may arise prior to the completion of the merger. See the section entitled “The Merger Agreement — No Solicitation” beginning on page 80 of this proxy statement/ prospectus for a description of the restrictive covenants applicable to EMJ.
      Failure to complete the merger could negatively affect the stock price and the future business and financial results of EMJ.
      Although EMJ’s board of directors has recommended that stockholders approve the proposal relating to the merger agreement, if the recommendation of the board of directors is adversely modified or withdrawn because the EMJ board of directors exercises its fiduciary duties and the voting agreement with the Kelso Funds is terminated there is no assurance that this proposal will be adopted and approved by the stockholders, and there is no assurance that Reliance and EMJ will receive the necessary regulatory approvals or satisfy the other conditions to the completion of the merger. If the merger is not completed for any reason, EMJ will be subject to several risks, including the following:
  •  EMJ may be required to pay and reimburse Reliance amounts of up to approximately $20.5 million in the aggregate if the merger agreement is terminated under certain circumstances;
 
  •  the current market price of EMJ common stock may reflect a market assumption that the merger will occur, and a failure to complete the merger could result in a negative perception by the market of EMJ generally and a resulting decline in the market price of EMJ common stock;
 
  •  many costs of EMJ relating to the merger (such as legal, accounting, and a portion of its financial advisory fees) are payable by EMJ whether or not the merger is completed;
 
  •  there may be substantial disruption to the business of EMJ and a distraction of its management and employees from day-to-day operations, because matters related to the merger may require substantial commitments of time and resources, which could otherwise have been devoted to other opportunities that could have been beneficial to EMJ; and
 
  •  EMJ would continue to face the risks that it currently faces as an independent company, as further described in the documents that EMJ has filed with the SEC that are incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/ prospectus.
      In addition, EMJ would not realize any of the expected benefits of having completed the merger. If the merger is not completed, the risks described above may materialize and materially adversely affect EMJ’s business, financial results, financial condition, prospects and stock price.
      EMJ executive officers and directors have financial interests in the merger that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of EMJ stockholders.
      Executive officers of EMJ participated in the negotiation of the terms of the merger agreement with their counterparts at Reliance, and EMJ’s board of directors approved the merger agreement and unanimously recommended that EMJ stockholders vote to adopt and approve the merger. In considering these facts and the other information contained in this proxy statement/ prospectus, you should be aware that some of EMJ’s executive officers and directors have financial interests in the merger that are different from, or in addition to, the interests of EMJ stockholders. For example, Mr. Nelson and Mr. Johnson have entered into agreements with EMJ that may provide, among other things, change of control, retention and severance and other benefits following the merger. In addition, certain executive officers have Holding options that will be cashed out at a substantial premium over their exercise price as a result of the merger. Mr. Nickell and Mr. Wahrhaftig, who are members of EMJ’s board of directors, are affiliated

31


Table of Contents

with the Kelso Funds, which own approximately 50.1% of the outstanding EMJ common stock. Pursuant to the registration rights agreement, Reliance has agreed to register, and provide the Kelso Funds with certain demand and piggyback registration rights with respect to the shares of Reliance common stock received by the Kelso Funds in the merger, to allow for the orderly sale of the shares of Reliance common stock that they receive as a result of the merger. These and some other interests of EMJ directors and executive officers may create potential conflicts of interest and cause some of these persons to view the merger differently than you may view it, as a stockholder. Please see “The Merger — Interests of EMJ’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger” beginning on page 68 of this proxy statement/ prospectus for more information about these financial interests.
The merger agreement limits EMJ’s ability to pursue alternatives to the merger.
      The merger agreement contains provisions that generally limit EMJ’s ability to pursue alternatives to the merger with Reliance. These provisions provide that EMJ may not (1) initiate, negotiate, solicit or knowingly encourage or facilitate (including by way of furnishing non-public information) any proposals with respect to a takeover proposal, (2) enter into any agreement with respect to any takeover proposal or (3) furnish, or provide access to, any information or data to, or have or participate in any discussions or negotiations with, any person relating to a takeover proposal; provided, however, that (a) EMJ may respond to an unsolicited bona fide written takeover proposal from a third party if EMJ’s board of directors determines in good faith, after receiving advice of its outside legal counsel and financial advisor, that the takeover proposal constitutes or is reasonably likely to constitute a superior proposal, and (b) EMJ’s board of directors may withdraw or modify its recommendation of the merger if it determines that a takeover proposal is a superior proposal or if it determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisors, that failure to withdraw or modify its recommendation of the merger may be reasonably expected to violate its fiduciary duties under applicable law.
      In addition, Reliance is entitled to receive a termination fee of approximately $20.5 million if Reliance terminates the merger agreement due to EMJ’s board of directors (1) withdrawing or adversely modifying its recommendation of the merger, (2) recommending another takeover proposal other than the merger or (3) determining to accept a superior proposal.
      Reliance required EMJ to agree to these provisions as a condition to Reliance’s willingness to enter into the merger agreement. These provisions, however, might discourage a third party that might have an interest in acquiring all of or a significant part of EMJ from considering or proposing that acquisition, even if that party were prepared to pay consideration with a higher per share market price than the current merger consideration. Furthermore, a potential competing acquiror might propose to pay a lower per share price to EMJ stockholders than it would otherwise have proposed to pay because of EMJ’s obligation, in connection with termination of the merger agreement, to pay Reliance the termination fee of approximately $20.5 million.
The price of Reliance common stock may be affected by factors different from those affecting the price of EMJ common stock.
      Holders of EMJ common stock will receive Reliance common stock in the merger and thus will become holders of Reliance common stock. The businesses of Reliance and EMJ differ in important respects and, accordingly, Reliance’s results of operations, as well as the price of Reliance common stock, may be affected by factors different from those currently affecting the independent results of operations of EMJ and the price of EMJ common stock. The price of Reliance common stock may fluctuate significantly following the merger, including fluctuation due to factors over which Reliance has no control. For a discussion of the businesses of Reliance and EMJ, see Reliance’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and EMJ’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2005, each of which is incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus, and “Information about Reliance” and “Information about EMJ” beginning on page 91 and page 92, respectively, of this proxy statement/ prospectus.

32


Table of Contents

The opinions obtained by EMJ from its financial advisors will not reflect changes in circumstances between signing of the merger agreement and the completion of the merger.
      EMJ has not obtained updated opinions as of the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus from its financial advisors. Changes in the operations and prospects of Reliance or EMJ, general market and economic conditions and other factors which may be beyond the control of Reliance and EMJ, and on which the financial advisors’ opinions were based, may significantly alter the value of Reliance or EMJ or the prices of shares of Reliance common stock or EMJ common stock by the time the merger is completed. The opinions do not speak as of the time the merger will be completed or as of any date other than the date of such opinions. Because EMJ currently does not anticipate asking its financial advisors to update their opinions, the opinions will not address the fairness of the merger consideration, from a financial point of view, at the time the merger is completed. For a description of the opinions that EMJ received from its financial advisors, please refer to “The Merger — Opinion of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC to EMJ’s Board of Directors” beginning on page 52 and “The Merger — Opinion of Duff & Phelps Securities, LLC to EMJ’s Board of Directors” beginning on page 57. For a description of the other factors considered by EMJ’s board of directors in determining to approve the merger, please refer to “The Merger — EMJ’s Reasons for the Merger” beginning on page 50 and “The Merger — Recommendation of EMJ’s Board of Directors” beginning on page 52.
EMJ’s stockholders’ voting power will be diluted, and they will not be able to control the outcome of a proposal voted on by Reliance stockholders.
      EMJ’s stockholders presently have the power to approve or reject any matter affecting EMJ requiring the approval of stockholders under Delaware law and EMJ’s certificate of incorporation. Immediately after the merger, EMJ’s stockholders, in the aggregate, will hold approximately 12.3% of the outstanding shares of Reliance common stock (based on an assumed exchange ratio of 0.0928, which would be the exchange ratio if the average closing price for the pricing period was $70.01). Even if all of the former EMJ stockholders voted in concert on all matters presented to Reliance’s shareholders, this number of Reliance shares, without a substantial number of other holders of Reliance common stock voting the same way, will not affect the outcome of proposals voted upon by the shareholders of Reliance.
Risks Relating to Reliance After the Merger
Existing shareholders may sell their shares which could depress the market price of Reliance’s common stock.
      Immediately following the merger, Reliance’s officers, directors and significant shareholders (including the Kelso Funds) will own approximately 7.4 million shares or approximately 19.6% of the outstanding shares of Reliance common stock that would be eligible to be resold into the public market. If these shareholders sell a large number of these shares or if there is a perception that they intend to sell a large number of these shares, the market price of Reliance’s common stock could decline, as these sales could be viewed by the public as an indication of unfavorable prospects for its operations.
Reliance may be unable to successfully integrate the businesses of EMJ on a timely basis and realize the full anticipated benefits of the merger.
      The merger involves the integration of two companies that have previously operated independently. As with every merger, there are potential difficulties of combining the companies’ businesses. These may include the integration of EMJ’s sales and marketing, distribution, processing, finance and administrative operations, with and into Reliance’s operations. The transition of certain processes following the merger could cause an interruption of, or loss of momentum in, the activities of one or more of the combined company’s businesses and the loss of key personnel. The diversion of management’s attention and any delays or difficulties encountered in connection with the merger and the integration of the two companies’ operations of these businesses could have an adverse effect on the business, results of operations, financial condition or prospects of Reliance after the merger.

33


Table of Contents

The value of your investment may be subject to sudden decreases due to the potential volatility of the price of Reliance common stock.
      The market price of Reliance common stock may be highly volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, including variations in Reliance’s quarterly results of operations. Other factors may include matters discussed in other risk factors and the following factors:
  •  changes in expectations as to Reliance’s future financial performance, including financial estimates by securities analysts and investors;
 
  •  developments affecting Reliance, its customers or its suppliers;
 
  •  changes in the legal or regulatory environment affecting Reliance’s business;
 
  •  press releases, earnings releases or publicity relating to Reliance or its competitors or relating to trends in the metals service industry;
 
  •  inability to meet securities analysts’ and investors’ quarterly or annual estimates or targets of Reliance performance;
 
  •  the operating and stock performance of other companies that investors may deem comparable;
 
  •  sales of Reliance common stock by the Kelso Funds; and
 
  •  general domestic or international economic, market and political conditions.
      These factors may adversely affect the trading price of Reliance common stock, regardless of Reliance’s actual operating performance, and could prevent you from selling your Reliance common stock at or above the value of the shares at the closing of the merger. In addition, the stock markets from time to time experience extreme price and volume fluctuations that may be unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of companies. In the past, some shareholders have brought securities class action lawsuits against companies following periods of volatility in the market price of their securities. Reliance may in the future be the target of similar litigation. Securities litigation, regardless of whether Reliance’s defense is ultimately successful, could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources.
Reliance’s substantial indebtedness could impair its financial condition and reduce the funds available to Reliance for other purposes and Reliance’s failure to comply with the covenants contained in its debt instruments could result in an event of default that could adversely affect its operating results.
      Reliance has substantial debt service obligations and will incur more debt as a result of this merger. As of December 31, 2005, assuming the merger had been completed as of such date, Reliance would have had aggregate outstanding indebtedness of approximately $1.1 billion. Reliance’s substantial indebtedness could adversely affect Reliance in the following ways:
  •  Reliance’s ability to obtain additional financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, general corporate purposes or other purposes may be impaired;
 
  •  a significant portion of Reliance’s cash flow from operations must be dedicated to the payment of interest and principal on its debt, which reduces the funds available to Reliance for its operations or other purposes;
 
  •  some of Reliance’s debt is, and will continue to be, at variable rates of interest, which may result in higher interest expense in the event of increases in interest rates;
 
  •  because Reliance may be more leveraged than some of its competitors, its debt may place Reliance at a competitive disadvantage;
 
  •  Reliance’s leverage will increase its vulnerability to economic downturns and limit Reliance’s ability to withstand adverse events in its business by limiting Reliance’s financial alternatives;

34


Table of Contents

  •  EMJ’s noteholders could require repurchase of EMJ’s 93/4% notes, as provided in the EMJ 93/4% notes indenture, which would substantially increase Reliance’s leverage and limit its access to funds for growth initiatives; and
 
  •  Reliance’s ability to capitalize on significant business opportunities and to plan for, or respond to, competition and changes in its business may be limited.
      Reliance’s debt agreements contain, and any agreements to refinance its debt likely will contain, financial and restrictive covenants that limit Reliance’s ability to incur additional debt, including to finance future operations or other capital needs, and to engage in other activities that Reliance may believe are in its long-term best interests, including to dispose of or acquire assets or other companies or to pay dividends to its shareholders. Reliance’s failure to comply with these covenants may result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived, could accelerate the maturity of Reliance’s indebtedness or prevent Reliance from accessing availability under its credit facility. If Reliance’s indebtedness is accelerated, it may not have sufficient cash resources to satisfy its debt obligations and Reliance may not be able to continue its operations as planned.
      Reliance may not be able to generate sufficient cash flow to meet its debt service obligations.
      Reliance’s annual debt service obligations until June 11, 2010, when its revolving credit facility is expected to mature, will be primarily limited to interest and principal payments on Reliance’s senior notes (with the principal payable only as and when they mature), on its credit facility, and on its industrial revenue bonds. Reliance’s ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to make scheduled payments on its debt obligations will depend on Reliance’s future financial performance, which will be affected by a range of economic, competitive and business factors, many of which are outside of Reliance’s control. For example, Reliance may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations to repay its credit facility when it matures in 2010, or its senior notes when they mature on various dates between 2006 and 2013 or its industrial revenue bonds when they mature in 2009 and 2014. If Reliance does not generate sufficient cash flow from operations to satisfy its debt obligations, Reliance expects to undertake alternative financing plans, such as refinancing or restructuring its debt, selling assets, reducing or delaying capital investments or seeking to raise additional capital. Reliance may not be able to consummate any such transaction at all or on a timely basis or on terms, and for proceeds, that are acceptable to it. Furthermore, these transactions may not be permitted under the terms of Reliance’s various debt instruments then in effect. Reliance’s inability to generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy its debt obligations, or to timely refinance its obligations on acceptable terms, could adversely affect Reliance’s ability to serve its customers and could cause Reliance to discontinue its operations as planned. Reliance’s credit facility is unsecured.
      In the merger, the newly-formed subsidiary of Reliance will assume all of the outstanding debt of EMJ, which, as of September 28, 2005, was approximately $299 million. In addition, as a result of the merger, the holders of EMJ’s 93/4% notes have the option to require the redemption of the notes at 101% of their face amount. The additional debt of EMJ and possible redemption of EMJ’s 93/4% notes might further impact Reliance’s ability to satisfy its debt obligations following the merger.
      Ongoing tax audits of Reliance may result in additional taxes.
      Reliance and EMJ are undergoing various tax audits. These tax audits could result in additional taxes, plus interest and penalties being assessed against either or both companies.
      The costs that Reliance pays for metals may fluctuate due to a number of factors beyond their control, which, on a combined basis, could adversely affect Reliance’s operating results if they cannot pass on higher metal prices to their customers.
      Reliance purchases large quantities of carbon, alloy, stainless steel, aluminum and other metals, which it sells to a variety of end-users. In 2004 the costs for carbon steel increased significantly and rapidly from historic levels. Although these costs declined somewhat in mid-2005, the costs increased in the fourth

35


Table of Contents

quarter of 2005 and overall carbon steel costs remained at historically high levels. Costs for aluminum and stainless steel products, excluding aerospace-related products, rose steadily in 2004 and there were some continued increases in 2005. Costs for aerospace-related products have increased significantly beginning in late 2004 and continued to increase through all of 2005. Reliance attempts to pass these cost increases on to its customers with higher selling prices. The costs to Reliance for these metals and the prices that it charges customers for its products may change depending on many factors outside of its control, including general economic conditions (both domestic and international), competition, production levels, customer demand levels, import duties and other trade restrictions, currency fluctuations and surcharges imposed by Reliance’s suppliers.
      Reliance maintains substantial inventories of metal to accommodate the short lead times and delivery requirements of its customers. Accordingly, Reliance purchases metal in quantities it believes to be appropriate to satisfy the anticipated needs of its customers based on information derived from customers, market conditions, historic usage and industry research. Commitments for metal purchases are generally at prevailing market prices in effect at the time orders are placed or at the time of shipment. During periods of rising prices for metal, Reliance may be negatively impacted by delays between the time of increases in the cost of metals to Reliance and increases in the prices that Reliance charges for its products if it is unable to pass these increased costs on to its customers. In addition, when metal prices decline, customer demands for lower prices could result in lower sale prices for Reliance’s products and, as Reliance uses existing inventory that it purchased at higher metal prices, lower margins. Consequently, during periods in which Reliance uses this existing inventory, the effects of changing metal prices could adversely affect Reliance’s operating results.
      The price of metals is subject to fluctuations in the supply and demand for metals worldwide and changes in the worldwide balance of supply and demand could negatively impact Reliance’s revenues, gross profit and net income.
      Metal prices are volatile due to, among other things, fluctuations in foreign and domestic production capacity, raw material availability, metals consumption and foreign currency rates. For example, in the past few years, China has significantly increased its consumption of metals and metal products. This large and growing demand for metals has significantly affected the metals industry, diverting supply to China and contributing to the recent increase in metal prices. If, in the future, China experiences a downturn in general economic conditions or increases its internal production of metals, its demand for metals produced outside of China could decrease. Such a decrease could cause a reduction in metal prices globally, which could adversely affect Reliance’s revenues, gross profit and net income. Additionally, significant currency fluctuations in the United States or abroad could negatively impact Reliance’s cost of metals and the pricing of its products. Recently, the decline in the dollar relative to foreign currencies resulted in increased prices for metals and metal products in the United States as imported metals became relatively more expensive. If, in the future, the dollar increases in value relative to foreign currencies, the domestic market may be more attractive to foreign producers, resulting in increased supply that could cause decreased metal prices and adversely affect Reliance’s revenues, gross profit and net income.
      Reliance operates in an industry that is subject to cyclical fluctuations and any downturn in general economic conditions or its customers’ industries could negatively impact its revenues, gross profit and net income.
      The metals service center industry is cyclical, impacted by both market demand and metals supply. Periods of economic slowdown or recession in the United States or other countries, or the public perception that these may occur, could decrease the demand for Reliance’s products and adversely affect its pricing. For example, the general slowing of the economy in 2001, 2002 and 2003 adversely impacted Reliance’s product sales and pricing. While Reliance experienced significantly improved pricing and healthy demand levels in 2004 and 2005, this trend may not continue. Changing economic conditions could

36


Table of Contents

depress or delay demand for Reliance’s products, which could adversely affect Reliance’s revenues, gross profit and net income.
      Reliance sells many products to industries that are cyclical, such as the industrial equipment, oil, gas and energy, construction, semiconductor, agricultural equipment and transportation industries, including aerospace. The demand for Reliance’s products is directly related to, and quickly impacted by, demand for the finished goods manufactured by Reliance’s customers in these industries, which may change as a result of the general United States or worldwide economy, domestic exchange rates, energy prices or other factors beyond Reliance’s control. If Reliance is unable to accurately project the product needs of its customers over varying lead times or if there is a limited availability of products through allocation by the mills or otherwise, Reliance may not have sufficient inventory to be able to provide products desired by its customers on a timely basis. In addition, if Reliance is not able to increase sales of products to customers in other industries when one or more of the cyclical industries that it serves is experiencing a decline, Reliance’s revenues, gross profit and net income may be adversely affected.
      Reliance competes with a large number of companies in the metals service center industry, and, if Reliance is unable to compete effectively, Reliance’s revenues, gross profit and net income may decline.
      Reliance competes with a large number of other general-line distributors and specialty distributors in the metals service center industry. Competition is based principally on price, inventory availability, timely delivery, customer service, quality and processing capabilities. Competition in the various markets in which Reliance participates comes from companies of various sizes, some of which have greater financial resources than Reliance does and some of which have more established brand names in the local markets Reliance serves. Accordingly, these competitors may be better able to withstand changes in conditions within Reliance’s customers’ industries and may have greater operating and financial flexibility than Reliance has. To compete for customer sales, Reliance may lower prices or offer increased services at a higher cost, which could reduce Reliance’s revenues, gross profit and net income.
      If Reliance was to lose any of its primary suppliers or otherwise be unable to obtain sufficient amounts of necessary metals on a timely basis, Reliance may not be able to meet its customers’ needs and may suffer reduced sales.
      Reliance has few long-term contracts to purchase metals. Therefore, its primary suppliers of carbon steel, alloy steel, stainless steel, aluminum or other metals could curtail or discontinue their delivery of these metals to Reliance in the quantities it needs. Reliance’s ability to meet its customers’ needs and provide value-added inventory management services depends on Reliance’s ability to maintain an uninterrupted supply of metal products from its suppliers. If Reliance’s suppliers experience production problems, lack of capacity or transportation disruptions, the lead times for receiving Reliance’s supply of metal products could be extended and the cost of Reliance’s inventory may increase. If, in the future, Reliance is unable to obtain sufficient amounts of the necessary metals at competitive prices and on a timely basis from its traditional suppliers, Reliance may not be able to obtain these metals from acceptable alternative sources at competitive prices to meet Reliance’s delivery schedules. Even if Reliance does find acceptable alternative suppliers, the process of locating and securing these alternatives may be disruptive to its business, which could have an adverse impact on Reliance’s ability to meet its customers’ needs and reduce its sales, gross profit and net income. In addition, if a significant domestic supply source is discontinued and Reliance cannot find acceptable domestic alternatives, Reliance may need to find a foreign source of supply. Dependence on foreign sources of supply could lead to longer lead times, increased price volatility, less favorable payment terms and certain tariffs and duties.
      Reliance’s acquisition of EMJ is its largest and first public company acquisition and there may be additional risks of which Reliance is not aware or existing risks may change over time.
      The EMJ acquisition is Reliance’s largest acquisition and its first acquisition of a public company. There may be additional risks associated with this acquisition that Reliance is not aware of at the present time because Reliance has not previously integrated a business of this size. After the acquisition,

37


Table of Contents

customers may choose to diversify their metals suppliers to reduce their dependence on a single supplier for the majority of their metals needs. Reliance may not be able to retain all of the Reliance and EMJ customers, and any loss of customers and the business that they bring to us could have an adverse effect on our operating results.
      Reliance has agreed to assume liability for EMJ’s various retirement and pension plans. The actual costs for the benefits to be provided to EMJ’s employees may exceed those projected, and future actuarial assessments of the extent of those costs may exceed the current assessment. Any adjustments that are required to be made to the recorded liability for these benefits could have an adverse effect on operating results and financial condition. In addition, Reliance may be required to make cash payments in excess or in addition to those that have been projected, which could have an adverse effect on cash flow. Reliance expects that it will record a significant amount of goodwill related to the acquisition of EMJ. If EMJ does not perform as anticipated, this could result in an impairment charge that could be material.
If Reliance does not successfully implement its acquisition growth strategy, its ability to grow its business could be impaired.
      Reliance may not be able to identify suitable acquisition candidates or successfully complete any acquisitions or integrate any other businesses into its operations. If Reliance cannot identify suitable acquisition candidates, Reliance is unlikely to sustain its historical growth rates, and, if Reliance cannot successfully integrate these businesses, it may incur increased or redundant expenses. Moreover, any additional indebtedness Reliance incurs to pay for these acquisitions could adversely affect its liquidity and financial strength.
As a decentralized business, Reliance depends on both senior management and Reliance’s key operating employees; if Reliance is unable to attract and retain these individuals, its ability to operate and grow its business may be adversely affected.
      Because of Reliance’s decentralized operating style, Reliance depends on the efforts of its senior management, including its chief executive officer, David H. Hannah, its president and chief operating officer, Gregg J. Mollins, and its executive vice president and chief financial officer, Karla Lewis, as well as other key operating employees. Reliance may not be able to retain these individuals or attract and retain additional qualified personnel when needed. EMJ has entered into a retention agreement with EMJ’s vice president, chief financial officer and secretary William S. Johnson, which provides for employment and severance benefits and has a term of three years, unless terminated earlier pursuant to its terms. If Mr. Johnson continues to serve as EMJ’s vice president, chief financial officer and secretary and his employment is terminated under certain circumstances, Mr. Johnson will be entitled to certain bonus amounts. See “The Merger — Interests of EMJ’s Directors and Officers in the Merger — Johnson Retention Agreement” on page 68 of this proxy statement/ prospectus for additional information regarding Mr. Johnson’s retention agreement. Other than the obligations RSAC will assume under Mr. Johnson’s retention agreement, Reliance does not have employment agreements with any of its officers or employees, which may mean they may have less of an incentive to stay with Reliance when presented with alternative employment opportunities. In addition, Reliance’s senior management and key operating employees hold stock options that have vested and hold common stock in Reliance’s employee stock ownership plan. These individuals may, therefore, be more likely to leave Reliance if the shares of its common stock significantly appreciate in value. The loss of any key officer or employee will require remaining officers and employees to direct immediate and substantial attention to seeking a replacement. Reliance’s inability to retain members of its senior management or key operating employees or to find adequate replacements for any departing key officer or employee on a timely basis could adversely affect Reliance’s ability to operate and grow its business.

38


Table of Contents

Reliance is subject to various environmental and employee safety and health regulations, which could subject Reliance to significant liabilities and compliance expenditures.
      Reliance is subject to certain federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations concerning air emissions, wastewater discharges, underground storage tanks and solid and hazardous waste disposal at or from its facilities. Reliance’s operations are also subject to various employee safety and health laws and regulations, including those concerning occupational injury and illness, employee exposure to hazardous materials and employee complaints. Environmental and employee safety and health regulations are comprehensive, complex and frequently changing. Some of these laws and regulations are subject to varying and conflicting interpretations. Reliance may be subject from time to time to administrative and/or judicial proceedings or investigations brought by private parties or governmental agencies with respect to environmental matters and employee safety and health issues. Currently, Reliance has no material outstanding unresolved issues with environmental regulators. Proceedings and investigations with respect to environmental matters and any employee safety and health issues could result in substantial costs to Reliance, divert its management’s attention and result in significant liabilities, fines or the suspension or interruption of Reliance’s service center activities. Some of Reliance’s current properties are located in industrial areas with histories of heavy industrial use. The location of these properties may require Reliance to incur expenditures and to establish environmental liabilities for costs that arise from causes other than Reliance’s operations. Future events, such as changes in existing laws and regulations or their enforcement, new laws and regulations or the discovery of conditions not currently known to Reliance, could create material compliance or remedial liabilities and costs which may constrain Reliance’s operations or make such operations more costly.
Reliance’s operating results have fluctuated, and are expected to continue fluctuating, depending on the season, and such fluctuations may adversely affect Reliance’s stock price.
      Many of Reliance’s customers are in seasonal businesses, including customers in the construction and related industries. In addition, Reliance’s revenues in the months of July, November and December traditionally have been lower than in other months because of increased vacation days and holiday closures for various customers. Consequently, you should not rely on Reliance’s results of operations during any particular quarter as an indication of Reliance’s results for a full year or any other quarter. In addition, if analysts and investors inaccurately estimate Reliance’s results of operations in one or more future quarters and Reliance’s operating results fall below expectations, Reliance’s stock price may decline.
Reliance’s business could be adversely affected by economic downturns.
      Demand for Reliance’s products is affected by a number of general economic factors. A decline in economic activity in the United States and other markets in which Reliance operates could materially affect Reliance’s financial condition and results of operation.
Damage to Reliance’s computer infrastructure and software systems could harm Reliance’s business.
      The unavailability of any of Reliance’s information management systems for any significant period of time could have an adverse effect on Reliance’s operations. In particular, Reliance’s ability to deliver products to its customers when needed, collect its receivables and manage inventory levels successfully largely depends on the efficient operation of Reliance’s computer hardware and software systems. Through Reliance’s information management systems, Reliance provides inventory availability to its sales and operating personnel, improves customer service through better order and product reference data and monitors operating results. Difficulties associated with upgrades, installations of major software or hardware, and integration with new systems could lead to business interruptions that could harm Reliance’s reputation, increase its operating costs and decrease its profitability. In addition, these systems are vulnerable to, among other things, damage or interruption from power loss, computer system and network failures, loss of telecommunications services, operator negligence, physical and electronic loss of data, or security breaches and computer viruses.

39


Table of Contents

      Reliance has contracted with a third-party service provider that provides Reliance with backup systems in the event that its information management systems are damaged. It is possible that the backup facilities and other protective measures Reliance takes could prove to be inadequate.
Principal shareholders who own a significant number of shares may have interests that conflict with yours.
      After giving effect to the merger, assuming an average closing price of Reliance common stock for the pricing period of $70.01 (which would be the average closing price for the pricing period if the pricing period ended on January 31, 2006), Florence Neilan, Reliance’s largest shareholder, will own 11.1% of the outstanding shares of Reliance common stock and the Kelso Funds will own 6.2% of the outstanding shares of Reliance common stock. As a result, these shareholders may have the ability to significantly influence matters requiring shareholder approval. In deciding how to vote on such matters, these shareholders may be influenced by interests that conflict with yours.
Reliance has implemented anti-takeover provisions that may adversely impact your rights as a holder of Reliance common stock.
      Reliance’s articles of incorporation and its bylaws could delay, defer or prevent a third party from acquiring Reliance, despite the possible benefit to its shareholders, or otherwise adversely affect the price of Reliance common stock and the rights of Reliance’s stockholders. Reliance is authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, no par value, with the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of such stock to be determined by Reliance’s board of directors, without a vote of the holders of common stock. The Reliance board of directors could grant rights to holders of preferred stock to reduce the attractiveness of Reliance as a potential takeover target, or make the removal of management more difficult. In addition, Reliance’s articles of incorporation and bylaws (1) impose advance notice requirements for shareholder proposals and nominations of directors to be considered at shareholder meetings and (2) establish a staggered or classified board of directors. These provisions may discourage potential takeover attempts, discourage bids for Reliance’s common stock at a premium over market price or adversely affect the market price of, and the voting and other rights of the holders of, Reliance’s common stock. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and other shareholders to elect directors other than the candidates nominated by Reliance’s board of directors. In addition, Reliance’s credit facility and the provisions of Reliance’s senior notes contain limitations on Reliance’s ability to enter into change of control transactions. See “Comparison of Stockholders’ Rights” beginning on page 102 of this proxy statement/ prospectus for additional information on the anti-takeover measures applicable to Reliance.

40


Table of Contents

THE EMJ SPECIAL MEETING
      This proxy statement/ prospectus is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies from the holders of EMJ common stock by EMJ’s board of directors for use at the special meeting of EMJ stockholders. The purpose of the special meeting is for you to consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt and approve the merger agreement and the merger. A copy of the merger agreement is attached to this proxy statement/ prospectus as Annex A and made part of this proxy statement/ prospectus.
      This proxy statement/ prospectus is first being furnished to EMJ stockholders on or about                     , 2006.
Date, Time and Place of the Special Meeting
      The special meeting will be held on                     , 2006, at      :      a.m. (local time) at                    located at                    , California.
Purpose of the Special Meeting
      The purpose of the special meeting will be to:
        1. allow the EMJ stockholders to consider and vote on a proposal to adopt and approve the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 17, 2006, by and among EMJ, Reliance and RSAC, pursuant to which EMJ will merge with and into RSAC, with RSAC as the surviving corporation, and Reliance will pay cash and issue shares of its common stock in exchange for the outstanding common stock of EMJ; and
 
        2. to transact any other business that may properly come before the meeting of stockholders or any adjournment or postponement of the special meeting, including to consider and vote upon any procedural matters incident to the conduct of the special meeting, such as adjournment of the special meeting.
Board Recommendation
      EMJ’s board of directors determined that the merger agreement and the merger are advisable and in the best interests of EMJ and its stockholders and unanimously approved the merger agreement and the merger. EMJ’s board of directors unanimously recommends that EMJ stockholders vote “FOR” adoption and approval of the merger agreement at the special meeting.
Who May Vote
      EMJ stockholders, as recorded in EMJ’s stock register at the close of business on                     , 2006, will be entitled to receive notice of and vote at the special meeting. As of                     , 2006, there were                     stockholders of record of EMJ common stock, as shown on the records of EMJ’s transfer agent for such shares.
Outstanding Shares and Quorum
      EMJ shares outstanding on                     , 2006, the record date for voting at the special meeting, consisted of 50,237,094 shares of common stock with one vote per share. The holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of EMJ common stock on the record date, represented in person or by proxy, will constitute a quorum for purposes of the special meeting. A quorum is necessary to hold the special meeting. Under the voting agreement, the Kelso Funds have agreed to be present at the meeting, so, unless the voting agreement is terminated, a quorum is assured. Any shares of EMJ common stock held in treasury by EMJ or by any of its subsidiaries are not considered to be outstanding for purposes of determining a quorum. Abstentions and “broker non-votes,” which will occur when a registered broker, who holds stock in street name, does not receive voting instructions from a beneficial owner, will be treated as present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum. Once a share is represented at

41


Table of Contents

the special meeting, it will be counted for the purpose of determining a quorum at the special meeting and any adjournment or postponement of the special meeting, unless the holder is present solely to object at the beginning of the special meeting to the transaction of any business because the meeting is not lawfully called or convened. However, if a new record date is set for the adjourned or postponed special meeting, then a new quorum will have to be established.
How Proxies Work
      EMJ’s board of directors is asking you to appoint Maurice S. Nelson, Jr. and William S. Johnson as your proxy holders to vote your shares at the special meeting to be held on                     , 2006. You make this appointment by voting the enclosed proxy card using one of the voting methods described below. Giving EMJ your proxy means you authorize the proxy holders to vote your shares at the special meeting, according to the directions you provide. You may vote for or against the merger agreement and the merger or abstain from voting.
      EMJ does not expect any matter to be brought before the special meeting other than the merger proposal. If other matters are properly presented at the special meeting, the persons named as proxies will vote in their discretion with respect to such matters. However, if a proposal regarding adjournment or postponement of the special meeting is properly presented to permit EMJ’s board of directors to further solicit proxies, the persons named in the proxies will not have discretion to vote shares voted against the merger agreement in favor of such adjournment or postponement.
Returning a Signed Proxy without Voting Instructions
      If you do return a signed proxy card without providing voting instructions, your shares will be voted in favor of the approval and adoption of the merger agreement and in the discretion of the proxies on any other matters that may come before the special meeting.
How EMJ Solicits Proxies
      In addition to this mailing, EMJ’s directors, officers and employees (who will receive no compensation in addition to their regular salaries) may solicit proxies personally, electronically, by telephone or with additional mailings. EMJ pays the costs of soliciting this proxy. EMJ reimburses brokers, banks and similar organizations, including the trustee of the retirement savings plan, for their reasonable charges and expenses in sending these materials to you and getting your voting instructions.
How to Vote Your Shares
      Voting EMJ shares you own directly. If your shares are held in your name, you can vote your shares in person at the special meeting or you can vote by proxy as follows:
  •  By telephone: Use the toll-free number listed on the proxy card. Easy-to-follow voice prompts allow you to vote your shares.
 
  •  By Internet: The Website for Internet voting is listed on the proxy card.
 
  •  By mail: Complete, sign, date and return your proxy card in the enclosed pre-addressed, postage-paid envelope.
      The telephone and Internet voting procedures use a control number that appears on your proxy card to authenticate you as a stockholder of record and to allow you to confirm that your voting instructions have been correctly recorded. If you vote by telephone or Internet, you do not need to return the proxy card. All proxy votes, whether cast by telephone, Internet or mail, must be received by American Stock Transfer and Trust Co. by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on                     , 2006.
      If you receive more than one proxy card or proxy voting instruction card it may mean that your EMJ shares are registered in different ways (for example you own EMJ common stock directly and through the retirement savings plan) or your shares are in more than one account. Please provide voting instructions

42


Table of Contents

for all proxy cards and proxy voting instruction cards you receive to ensure that all of your EMJ shares are voted at the special meeting.
      Voting EMJ shares you hold through a nominee. If you hold shares through someone else, such as a stockbroker, bank or other nominee, you will receive material from that firm asking how you want to vote. You can complete the firm’s voting form and return it to the firm. If the firm offers telephone or Internet voting, the voting form will contain instructions on how to access those voting methods.
      If you intend to vote your nominee shares in person at the special meeting, you must bring to the special meeting an account statement or letter from the nominee indicating that you beneficially owned the shares on                     , 2006, the record date for voting.
Voting Shares in the Earle M. Jorgensen Retirement Savings Plan
      If you hold EMJ common stock in the Earle M. Jorgensen Retirement Savings Plan, the trustee will vote those shares as you direct. You may direct the trustee how to vote the number of shares of EMJ common stock that are credited to your account as of                     , 2006, the record date. You can direct the trustee by completing and returning your proxy voting instruction card or by telephone or through the Internet, in accordance with the instructions provided with respect to the retirement savings plan. All proxy voting instructions for your retirement savings plan account, whether by mail, telephone or Internet, must be received no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on                     , 2006 in order to be processed in a timely manner. Your voting instructions will be kept confidential. If the trustee does not receive timely voting instructions from you, the trustee will vote all shares in the retirement savings plan for which it did not receive voting directions in the same proportion as the votes of the retirement savings plan shares for which it received timely voting directions from other participants in the retirement savings plan.
Revoking a Proxy
      If you are a stockholder of record, you may change your vote in one of the following ways before your proxy is voted at the special meeting:
  •  submit to the secretary of EMJ a revocation letter with a later date than your proxy card;
 
  •  deliver, no later than 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on                     , 2006, a second completed and signed proxy card dated later than the first signed proxy card;
 
  •  vote at a later time, but no later than 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on                     , 2006, by telephone or the Internet; or
 
  •  attend the special meeting and vote in person.
      If you hold your shares through a nominee, you may later revoke your proxy instructions by informing the broker in accordance with the broker’s procedures.
      If you hold your shares through the retirement savings plan, you must
  •  deliver, no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on                     , 2006, a second completed and signed proxy voting instruction card dated later than the first signed proxy voting instruction card; or
 
  •  vote at a later time, but no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on                     , 2006, by telephone or the Internet.
      To submit a written notice of revocation or other communications about revoking your proxy, or to request a new proxy card, you should write to:
Earle M. Jorgensen Company
10650 Alameda Street
Lynwood, California 90262
Attention: Secretary

43


Table of Contents

      If you are a street name stockholder, and you vote by proxy, you may later revoke your proxy instructions by informing the holder of record in accordance with that holder’s procedures.
Confidential Voting
      American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, EMJ’s transfer agent, will count the votes. Its officers or employees will serve as inspectors of election. Your individual vote, proxies, consents, ballots and voting materials are confidential, except in special circumstances (such as a contested proxy or consent solicitation or as otherwise required by law). For example, if you write comments on your proxy card or accompanying material, your comments will be provided to EMJ without indicating how you voted, unless you include your vote in your comment or if how you voted is necessary to understand your comment.
Effects of Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes
      Absent specific instructions from the beneficial owner of shares, brokers may not vote shares of EMJ common stock with respect to the adoption of the merger agreement, any other matters that may properly come before the special meeting, or any adjournment or postponement of the special meeting. For purposes of determining adoption and approval of the merger agreement, abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same effect as a vote “against” the merger agreement.
Vote Required
      Each outstanding share of EMJ common stock on the record date entitles the holder to one vote at the special meeting. Under the provisions of EMJ’s certificate of incorporation and the Delaware General Corporation Law, approval of the merger agreement and the merger requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of EMJ’s common stock outstanding on the record date.
      Because the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of EMJ common stock is needed to adopt and approve the merger agreement, the failure to submit your proxy or vote in person will have the same effect as a vote “against” the adoption and approval of the merger agreement. Abstentions and broker non-votes also will have the same effect as a vote “against” the adoption and approval of the merger agreement. Accordingly, EMJ’s board of directors urges stockholders to complete, date, sign and return the accompanying proxy card, or to submit a proxy by telephone or through the Internet by following the instructions included with your proxy card, or, in the event you hold your shares through a broker, bank, or other nominee, by following the separate voting instructions received from your broker, bank, or nominee.
      As a condition to the signing of the merger agreement, Reliance required the Kelso Funds, which collectively own approximately 50.1% of the EMJ common stock outstanding, to enter into a voting agreement to vote all of their shares in favor of adoption and approval of the merger agreement and the merger. Therefore, unless the voting agreement is terminated prior to the special meeting in accordance with its terms, the merger will be approved at the special meeting regardless of the votes of any other stockholders.
Adjournments and Postponements
      Although it is not currently expected, the special meeting may be adjourned or postponed for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies. Any adjournment may be made without notice, other than by an announcement made at the special meeting. The person presiding at the special meeting or a majority of the shares of EMJ common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the special meeting may adjourn the special meeting, whether or not a quorum is present. Any signed proxies received by EMJ will be voted in favor of an adjournment in these circumstances, although a proxy vote “against” adoption and approval of the merger agreement will not be voted in favor of an adjournment for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies. Any adjournment or postponement of the special meeting for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies will allow the EMJ stockholders who have already sent in their proxies to revoke them at any time prior to their use at the special meeting as adjourned or postponed,

44


Table of Contents

provided that, such revocation is in compliance with the instructions (including as to the timing) set forth in the section entitled “The EMJ Special Meeting — Revoking a Proxy” beginning on page 43 of this proxy statement/ prospectus and the enclosed proxy card, and provided further, that if you participate in the retirement savings plan, any revocation or other instruction must be given to the trustee at least three days prior to the date of the special meeting as adjourned or postponed.
Householding
      Some banks, brokers, and other nominee record holders may be participating in the practice of “householding” proxy statements and annual reports. This means that only one copy of this proxy statement/ prospectus may have been sent to multiple stockholders in your household. EMJ will promptly deliver a separate copy of this proxy statement/ prospectus to you if you write or call Earle M. Jorgensen Company, 10650 Alameda Street, Lynwood, California, Attention: William S. Johnson, Secretary, Telephone: (323) 567-1122.
Stockholders should NOT send stock certificates with their proxy cards.
      If the merger is completed, stockholders will be mailed a transmittal form promptly by the exchange/paying agent following the completion of the merger with instructions on how to exchange their EMJ common stock certificates.

45


Table of Contents

THE MERGER
      This section of the proxy statement/ prospectus describes material aspects of the merger. While Reliance and EMJ believe that the description covers the material terms of the merger and the related transactions, this summary may not contain all of the information that is important to you. You should carefully read this entire proxy statement/ prospectus, the attached Annexes, and the other documents which this proxy statement/ prospectus incorporates by reference, for a more complete understanding of the merger. The merger agreement, not this summary, is the legal document which governs the merger.
General
      EMJ’s board of directors is using this proxy statement/ prospectus to solicit proxies from the holders of EMJ common stock for use at the EMJ special meeting, where holders of EMJ common stock will be asked to vote upon adoption and approval of the merger agreement. In addition, Reliance is sending this document to EMJ stockholders as a prospectus in connection with the issuance of shares of Reliance common stock in exchange for EMJ common stock in the merger.
Background of the Merger
      During the week of September 12, 2005, UBS, financial advisor to Reliance, contacted Mr. Wahrhaftig, to express preliminary interest in an acquisition of EMJ by Reliance. Mr. Wahrhaftig is one of EMJ’s directors and a managing director of Kelso & Company, whose affiliates own a majority of EMJ’s outstanding common stock. Mr. Wahrhaftig suggested that UBS have Mr. Hannah contact Kelso. Mr. Hannah is the chief executive officer of Reliance. On September 19, 2005, Mr. Wahrhaftig and Mr. Nickell, a director of EMJ and chief executive officer of Kelso, spoke to Mr. Hannah and Mr. Mollins, president and chief operating officer of Reliance. Mr. Hannah confirmed Reliance’s interest in the acquisition of EMJ for consideration consisting of both cash and Reliance common stock in an amount in excess of $12.00 per share. On September 20, 2005, the closing price of EMJ’s common stock was $10.01 and the closing price of Reliance common stock was $48.98. Mr. Hannah suggested that the next steps would be to enter into a confidentiality agreement and have Reliance conduct preliminary due diligence prior to making a more specific proposal. Mr. Nickell and Mr. Wahrhaftig indicated that they would contact the other members of EMJ’s board of directors to determine the board’s interest in entering into a confidentiality agreement and allowing preliminary due diligence.
      Mr. Nickell and Mr. Wahrhaftig promptly notified each of the other members of EMJ’s board of directors of Reliance’s interest. Each of EMJ’s directors indicated his willingness to enter into a confidentiality agreement and provide preliminary due diligence information. On September 20, 2005, Mr. Nickell and Mr. Wahrhaftig called Mr. Hannah to advise him that EMJ’s board of directors was interested in proceeding further to investigate the possibility of a transaction. Mr. Nickell and Mr. Wahrhaftig, on behalf of EMJ’s board of directors, then directed EMJ’s outside legal counsel, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, to prepare a confidentiality agreement. Reliance and EMJ entered into a mutual confidentiality agreement on October 5, 2005.
      On October 6, 2005, Mr. Nickell and Mr. Wahrhaftig, on behalf of EMJ’s board of directors, met with Mr. Hannah and Mr. Mollins to discuss in general terms the background of the two companies and Reliance’s philosophy with respect to the operation of companies following acquisition. In addition, they discussed the metals service center industry and mutual perceptions of the two companies. They also discussed the next steps in the process of determining the potential for a transaction. The parties agreed that Reliance would provide a preliminary due diligence request list to Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP. On October 7, 2005, Reliance sent a preliminary due diligence request list to Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP. On October 7, 2005, after discussing potential financial advisors with members of EMJ’s board of directors and obtaining their recommendation, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP contacted Credit Suisse to explore their interest in providing financial advisory services to EMJ’s board of directors with respect to a possible transaction. Credit Suisse was contacted because of its expertise in providing financial advisory services in merger and acquisition transactions and its long-standing relationship with EMJ, commencing

46


Table of Contents

in 1993 and continuing through its role as joint-bookrunning underwriter of the EMJ initial public offering in April 2005.
      On October 11, 2005, EMJ’s board of directors held a special meeting. Mr. Nickell reviewed the discussions with UBS and Mr. Hannah in which Reliance had expressed an interest in acquiring EMJ. Mr. Nelson, EMJ’s chief executive officer, also reported that he had a telephone conversation with Mr. Hannah on October 5, 2005, in which Mr. Hannah confirmed Reliance’s interest in acquiring EMJ. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP informed the members of EMJ’s board of directors that EMJ had entered into a mutual confidentiality agreement with Reliance and was preparing a response to a preliminary due diligence request list received from UBS. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP also noted that they were reviewing the public filings of Reliance with a view to preparing a similar request for information from Reliance. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP provided EMJ’s board of directors with an overview of its fiduciary duties, and the procedures for reviewing, evaluating and negotiating a possible transaction and discussed with them the standards of conduct and the alternatives that should be considered in connection with a possible sale of EMJ. Such discussion included a discussion of EMJ’s strategic alternatives, including continuing as an independent company, conducting a formal or informal auction process and negotiating exclusively with Reliance.
      After such discussion, Credit Suisse joined the meeting by conference call to make a presentation to EMJ’s board of directors with respect to its possible engagement as EMJ’s financial advisor in connection with a transaction. Credit Suisse discussed its qualifications and the team of professionals that it would use on a transaction, reviewed the publicly-available information with respect to EMJ and Reliance, provided an overview of the financial analyses that would be used to assess the terms of any transaction and discussed the processes for EMJ to consider a proposal from Reliance and compare such a proposal to EMJ’s strategic alternatives. Following the presentation, Credit Suisse left the call, and EMJ’s board of directors discussed Credit Suisse’s qualifications and the advantages and disadvantages of interviewing other candidates. After such discussion, EMJ’s board of directors authorized the engagement of Credit Suisse as EMJ’s financial advisor, decided to pursue discussions with Reliance to develop a proposal and authorized Mr. Mason, Mr. Nelson, Mr. Nickell, and Mr. Wahrhaftig to be the primary contacts with Credit Suisse.
      On October 12, 2005, Mr. Wahrhaftig called Mr. Hannah to confirm that Credit Suisse had been engaged by EMJ and to discuss the timing of a management meeting. On October 14, 2005, EMJ provided Reliance with materials in response to the preliminary due diligence request list. On October 17, 2005, Credit Suisse submitted to Reliance a preliminary due diligence request list with respect to Reliance. On October 19, 2005, Mr. Nelson, Mr. McCaffery and Mr. Johnson, the senior executive officers of EMJ, met with Mr. Hannah, Mr. Mollins and Ms. Lewis, their counterparts at Reliance. Representatives from Credit Suisse and UBS also attended the meeting. The representatives of EMJ discussed their operations and answered questions from representatives of Reliance. Representatives of Reliance also discussed generally their expectations of how EMJ might be combined with Reliance.
      On October 28, 2005, EMJ received from Reliance a letter and summary of terms proposing the acquisition of all of the EMJ common stock at a purchase price of $12.00 per share with consideration consisting of 50% cash and 50% Reliance common stock. Reliance also asked for certain transaction protections including a break up fee equal to 4% of the equity value, a voting agreement requiring the Kelso Funds to vote in favor of the transaction, whether or not EMJ’s board of directors had withdrawn or adversely modified its recommendation of the transaction, and an option on the shares owned by the Kelso Funds at the transaction price. Mr. Hannah also called Mr. Nelson to confirm that he had received the proposal and to highlight some of the terms. The letter and summary of terms were promptly provided to the members of EMJ’s board of directors.
      On October 31, 2005, EMJ’s board of directors held a special meeting. Mr. Nelson reported on the due diligence meeting held with the management of Reliance. Representatives of Credit Suisse reviewed with EMJ’s board of directors the letter and summary of terms. After some discussion it was agreed that

47


Table of Contents

discussion would be continued at a meeting to follow EMJ’s regularly scheduled quarterly board meeting on November 2, 2005.
      On November 2, 2005, following EMJ’s regular board meeting, EMJ’s board of directors met with its advisors to review the letter and summary of terms received from Reliance and to consider EMJ’s response. EMJ’s board of directors discussed, among other issues, the proposed purchase price, the premium it represented over EMJ’s closing price on November 1, 2005, and EMJ’s stock performance since the initial approach by Reliance. In addition, the members of the board of directors discussed the proposed levels of the cash and stock consideration, the trading price of the Reliance common stock relative to historic levels and customary transaction protection provisions. On November 1, 2005, the closing price of EMJ common stock was $8.24 and the closing price of Reliance’s common stock was $57.89. Credit Suisse reviewed the provisions of the summary of terms and a preliminary financial analysis of both companies based on publicly available information. EMJ’s board of directors also discussed with its advisors the ability of Reliance to finance the proposed transaction, and the prospect for increasing the percentage of consideration to be paid in cash. A variety of alternative proposals and negotiation strategies were discussed. On November 4, 2005, Mr. Hannah spoke with Mr. Wahrhaftig regarding the proposal and the timing of EMJ’s response. At that time, Mr. Wahrhaftig asked whether Reliance would be willing to increase the cash portion of the consideration, but Reliance was not willing to make a significant change. An EMJ board meeting was scheduled for November 7, 2005 after Credit Suisse had completed additional financial analysis.
      On November 7, 2005, EMJ’s board of directors held a special meeting and received a formal presentation from Credit Suisse as to its preliminary financial analysis of EMJ. EMJ’s board of directors then reviewed the letter and summary of terms from Reliance and decided to make a counterproposal. The board of directors directed Credit Suisse to propose a $14.00 per share all cash purchase price and a break up fee of 3% of the equity value. After discussion with Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP of the legal considerations of a voting agreement and an option on the shares owned by the Kelso Funds, the board directed Credit Suisse to propose a voting agreement between Reliance and the Kelso Funds subject to customary termination provisions if EMJ’s board of directors withdraws or adversely modifies its recommendation of the merger, and to reject the request for an option on the shares owned by the Kelso Funds. EMJ’s board of directors also discussed the potential treatment of stock options. EMJ’s board of directors determined that the counterproposal should contain provisions for vested Holding options to be paid in cash, and for the EMJ options granted in 2005 to be rolled over into comparable Reliance options. EMJ’s management team other than Mr. Nelson was asked to leave the meeting and EMJ’s board of directors also discussed a retention agreement for Mr. Johnson because of the potential for reduced responsibilities for Mr. Johnson following the merger. EMJ’s board of directors determined it was appropriate to give Mr. Johnson a retention agreement that would provide him with additional compensation up to the limits of Section 280G of the Code. EMJ’s board of directors then discussed a bonus pool to be provided for EMJ’s senior management. The bonus pool would provide compensation for the exceptional management performance that had enabled EMJ to successfully complete the merger and financial restructuring and initial public offering in 2005. Mr. Nickell proposed a bonus pool of $5 million. The allocation of the bonus pool would be based on the recommendations of Mr. Nelson and the approval of those allocations by EMJ’s board of directors. EMJ’s board of directors unanimously approved the proposal and directed that Mr. Johnson’s retention agreement and the bonus pool be included in the counterproposal to Reliance.
      On November 11, 2005, EMJ’s board of directors held a special meeting to discuss Reliance’s response to EMJ’s counterproposal. Reliance had responded with a purchase price of $12.30 per share, with consideration consisting of 50% cash and 50% Reliance common stock. Reliance continued to ask for transaction protection provisions including a break up fee equal to 4% of the equity value, a voting agreement between Reliance and the Kelso Funds that would not be subject to termination upon a change in EMJ’s board of directors’ recommendation, and an option on the stock held by the Kelso Funds. Reliance agreed to the Johnson retention agreement and the bonus pool as proposed. Reliance noted that it would require 30 business days to complete formal due diligence and negotiate definitive agreements

48


Table of Contents

and requested exclusivity for that period. Credit Suisse reported that UBS had indicated that Reliance was not prepared to pay $14.00 per share, or to enter into a transaction that did not contain 50% of the merger consideration in stock. EMJ’s board of directors reviewed the Reliance proposal, and instructed Credit Suisse to indicate that $12.30 per share was not an acceptable price. The members of EMJ’s board of directors were advised that because of their large holdings of EMJ stock, the Kelso Funds would be the only EMJ stockholders that would not be able to resell the Reliance common stock received as merger consideration without those shares being registered for resale. As a result, the members of EMJ’s board of directors asked Credit Suisse to determine what measures could be provided for the orderly sale of the Reliance common stock that would be received by the Kelso Funds upon completion of a transaction.
      On November 17, 2005, EMJ’s board of directors held a special meeting to receive a report from Credit Suisse on discussions with UBS. Credit Suisse advised EMJ’s board of directors that in their discussion with UBS, UBS had insisted that it needed an indication of price to discuss a response with Reliance. Credit Suisse had responded that they had no specific instructions or authorization from EMJ, but suggested that a price of $13.70 would reflect a decrease in EMJ’s current position commensurate with the increase shown by Reliance from its previous offer. UBS responded that its client would not make another bid without a revised proposal from EMJ. UBS also indicated that Reliance would be willing to provide liquidity for the Kelso Funds in the form of customary registration rights and to treat the Holding and EMJ options as requested. After discussion, EMJ’s board of directors instructed Credit Suisse to propose a purchase price of $13.25 per share and to agree to merger consideration consisting of 50% cash and 50% Reliance common stock and a due diligence period and exclusivity of 30 business days. In addition, the proposal included a symmetrical collar of 15% based on a trading period prior to signing definitive documentation, and a break up fee of 3% of the equity value.
      On November 22, 2005, EMJ’s board of directors held a special meeting to receive a report from Credit Suisse. Credit Suisse reported that Reliance had proposed a purchase price of $12.75 per share, with consideration consisting of 50% cash and 50% Reliance common stock and an exchange ratio based on the closing price of Reliance common stock on November 21, 2005, which was $64.11 per share, subject to a 15% symmetrical collar, and a break up fee equal to 3% of the equity value. Reliance continued to ask for a voting agreement between Reliance and the Kelso Funds that would not be subject to termination upon the withdrawal of or a change in the recommendation of EMJ’s board of directors and an option on the stock held by the Kelso Funds. After discussion, EMJ’s board of directors instructed Credit Suisse to propose a purchase price of $13.00 per share, with consideration consisting of 50% cash and 50% Reliance common stock, and a customary mechanism of determining the exchange ratio in connection with the collar based on the average closing price of the Reliance stock for a period prior to signing of definitive documentation. After additional discussion with Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP of the relevant legal considerations, EMJ’s board of directors reiterated that the voting agreement should be subject to customary termination provisions if EMJ’s board of directors withdraws or adversely modifies its recommendation of the merger and that they would not allow the Kelso Funds to provide an option on their shares.
      On November 28, 2005, EMJ’s board of directors held a special meeting. Credit Suisse reported on its discussions with UBS and reviewed a term sheet summarizing the terms of a proposed transaction. Credit Suisse indicated that Reliance had agreed to a purchase price of $13.00 per share of EMJ, with consideration consisting of 50% cash and 50% Reliance common stock. Reliance had also agreed to a symmetrical collar of 15% on an exchange ratio to be determined based on the average closing price of the Reliance common stock for a trading period prior to signing definitive documentation to be negotiated, and a voting agreement between Reliance and the Kelso Funds subject to customary termination provisions if EMJ’s board of directors withdraws or adversely modifies its recommendation of the merger. The parties had further agreed that due diligence would commence immediately. The term sheet provided for an exclusive period of 30 business days in which to complete due diligence and negotiate and sign definitive documentation. EMJ’s board of directors also decided to engage Duff & Phelps to provide an independent fairness opinion in connection with the transaction. Duff & Phelps was selected because of their expertise

49


Table of Contents

as financial advisor in mergers and acquisitions, as well as their past involvement with EMJ as financial advisor to the EMJ stock bonus plan, including in connection with the merger and financial restructuring and initial public offering in April 2005.
      Representatives of Reliance commenced formal due diligence on November 29, 2005, and due diligence continued throughout the period up to the signing of the merger agreement. On December 1, 2005, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP delivered drafts of the merger agreement and the voting agreement to Reliance and its representatives. On December 5, 2005, representatives of EMJ followed up with supplemental requests for diligence information from Reliance, which information was received during the week following the request. A mutual due diligence meeting was held on December 15, 2005, with EMJ and Reliance management and their respective advisors. The parties continued to negotiate the merger agreement, voting agreement and other related documents through the first half of January.
      On January 17, 2006, EMJ’s board of directors met to review the merger agreement and discuss the proposed transaction. EMJ management and representatives of Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP described the due diligence process and summarized the results of EMJ’s due diligence on Reliance. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP then discussed with EMJ’s board of directors the legal principles and standards applicable to its consideration of the proposed merger, described the material terms of the merger agreement, voting agreement and the transaction and discussed the projected timetable for the transaction. Following discussion among, and questions by EMJ’s board of directors and others present, Credit Suisse reviewed with the board of directors its financial analysis with respect to the merger consideration and rendered to the board of directors an oral opinion, which opinion was confirmed by delivery of a written opinion dated January 17, 2006, to the effect that, as of that date and based on and subject to the matters described in its opinion, the merger consideration was fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of EMJ common stock (other than Reliance and its subsidiaries, the Kelso Funds and their respective affiliates). See “— Opinion of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC to the Board of Directors of EMJ.” Also at this meeting, Duff & Phelps reviewed with the board of directors its financial analysis with respect to the merger consideration and rendered to EMJ’s board of directors an oral opinion, which opinion was confirmed by delivery of a written opinion dated January 17, 2006, to the effect that, as of that date and based on and subject to the matters described in its opinion, the merger consideration was fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of EMJ common stock (other than Reliance and its subsidiaries, the Kelso Funds and their respective affiliates). See “Opinion of Duff & Phelps Securities, LLC to EMJ’s Board of Directors.” Following further discussion and questions to EMJ’s management and advisors, EMJ’s board of directors determined that the merger was advisable and in the best interests of EMJ and its stockholders and the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement were unanimously approved and adopted.
      After approval by the respective boards of directors of EMJ and Reliance, the merger agreement and voting agreement were executed by the parties to such agreements and the proposed merger was jointly announced by EMJ and Reliance on the evening of January 17, 2006, after the close of U.S. financial markets.
EMJ’s Reasons for the Merger
      EMJ’s board of directors consulted with EMJ’s management, as well as its legal and financial advisors, in its evaluation of the merger. In reaching its conclusion to approve the merger agreement and in determining that the merger is in the best interests of EMJ and its stockholders, EMJ’s board of directors considered a number of factors, including the following:
  •  the price being paid for each share of EMJ common stock represents a substantial premium over historical trading prices, including a premium of 30% over the initial public offering price of $10.00, 24.6% over the closing sale price on the New York Stock Exchange on January 17, 2005 (the trading day on which EMJ announced the execution of the merger agreement), and 31.1% over the preceding 30-trading day average, 37.1% over the preceding 60-trading day average and 36.5% over the preceding 90-trading day average;

50


Table of Contents

  •  its belief that the merger was more favorable to stockholders than any other alternative reasonably available to EMJ and its stockholders, including a business combination with another company in the metals and steel industry (based on its belief that no other company in the metals and steel industry with the ability to acquire EMJ was likely to be interested in pursuing a business combination with EMJ and no private investment management firm or financial buyer was likely to offer a purchase price greater than the purchase price agreed to with Reliance);
 
  •  its belief that Reliance would be able to consummate the transaction and successfully integrate the EMJ operations, taking into account Reliance’s track record in successfully integrating substantial acquisitions;
 
  •  its belief that the market price of the EMJ common stock was not likely to rise to the level of the purchase price in the near future if EMJ continued as an independent company because of the overhang of the Kelso Funds’ ownership interest, the relatively low amount of EMJ common stock held by the public, the low average daily trading volume of the EMJ common stock, the cyclical nature of the steel and metals industry on which EMJ’s business depends and general economic and market conditions both on a historical and prospective basis;
 
  •  its belief that the 15% symmetrical collar protected the EMJ stockholders from a possible decline within the collar range of the Reliance common stock from its current trading levels;
 
  •  the financial and other terms and conditions of the merger agreement, including the terms relating to the receipt and consideration of alternative acquisition proposals;
 
  •  the fact that the transaction will be immediately accretive to the earnings of Reliance and the stockholders of EMJ will be able to participate in the potential benefits of the transaction to the Reliance common stock because approximately 50% of the merger consideration consists of Reliance common stock;
 
  •  the market position of the combined company, including that it will be an industry leader in the distribution of flat-rolled, tubular and bar products and carbon steel, stainless steel and aluminum products;
 
  •  the likelihood that the regulatory approvals needed to complete the transaction will be obtained;
 
  •  the historical and current market prices of Reliance common stock and EMJ common stock as well as comparative valuation analyses for the two companies;
 
  •  the financial presentation of Credit Suisse, including Credit Suisse’s opinion dated January 17, 2006 to EMJ’s board of directors as to the fairness of the merger consideration, from a financial point of view, to the EMJ common stockholders (other than Reliance and its subsidiaries, the Kelso Funds and their respective affiliates) (see “— Opinion of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC to EMJ’s Board of Directors”);
 
  •  the financial presentation of Duff & Phelps, including Duff & Phelps’ opinion dated January 17, 2006, to EMJ’s board of directors as to the fairness of the merger consideration, from a financial point of view, to the EMJ common stockholders (other than Reliance and its subsidiaries, the Kelso Funds and their respective affiliates) (see “— Opinion of Duff & Phelps Securities, LLC to EMJ’s Board of Directors”);
 
  •  the expected tax treatment of the merger and the receipt by the EMJ stockholders of the merger consideration;
 
  •  the expected impact of the transaction on the EMJ employees;
 
  •  the fact that, subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of the merger agreement, EMJ is permitted, prior to stockholder approval, to furnish information to and conduct negotiations with third parties that make a takeover proposal;

51


Table of Contents

  •  the fact that, subject to compliance with the terms and conditions of the merger agreement, EMJ is permitted to terminate the merger agreement, prior to stockholder approval, in order to approve an alternative transaction proposed by a third party that is a superior proposal, upon the payment to Reliance of an approximately $20.5 million termination fee (representing approximately 3% of the total equity value of EMJ) (see “The Merger Agreement — Termination of the Merger Agreement”);
 
  •  the fact that the voting agreement between Reliance and the Kelso Funds terminates if EMJ’s board of directors withdraws or adversely modifies its recommendation of the merger (see “The Voting Agreement”);
 
  •  the availability of appraisal rights to holders of EMJ common stock who comply with all of the required procedures under Delaware law, which allow such holders to seek appraisal of the fair value of their shares as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery (see “Dissenters’ Rights of Appraisal” and Annex E); and
 
  •  EMJ’s board of directors’ understanding, after consultation with its professional advisors, that both the approximately $20.5 million termination fee and the circumstances when such fee is payable, are reasonable and customary in light of the benefits of the merger, commercial practice and transactions of this size and nature.
      EMJ’s board of directors also considered potential risks associated with the merger in connection with its deliberations of the proposed transaction. These risks included the possibility that the voting agreement, the non-solicitation provisions of the merger agreement and the termination fee could have the effect of discouraging other parties potentially interested in a transaction with EMJ from proposing a transaction, risks relating to the Reliance business, risks relating to Reliance’s ability to successfully integrate the EMJ business and realize the benefits of the merger, the need to obtain EMJ stockholder and regulatory approvals in order to complete the transaction; and the risks to EMJ if the merger does not close, including the diversion of management and employee attention, possible customer, vendor, employee and other relationship attrition and resultant possible revenue loss, relating to various aspects of EMJ’s business. EMJ’s board of directors considered all the factors outlined above, as well as these risks, as a whole, and overall considered them on balance to be favorable to, and to support, its determination.
      The foregoing discussion of the information and factors considered by EMJ’s board of directors is not exhaustive, but includes the material factors considered by EMJ’s board of directors. In view of the wide variety of factors considered by EMJ’s board of directors in connection with its evaluation of the merger and the complexity of these matters, EMJ’s board of directors did not consider it practical to, nor did it attempt to, quantify, rank or otherwise assign relative weights to the specific factors that it considered in reaching its decision. EMJ’s board of directors evaluated the factors described above, including by asking questions of EMJ management and EMJ legal and financial advisors, and reached consensus that the merger was in the best interests of EMJ and the EMJ stockholders. In considering the factors described above, individual members of EMJ’s board of directors may have given different weights to different factors.
Recommendation of EMJ’s Board of Directors
      EMJ’s board of directors determined that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, are advisable and in the best interests of EMJ and its stockholders. Accordingly, EMJ’s board of directors unanimously approved the merger and the merger agreement and unanimously recommends that EMJ stockholders vote “FOR” adoption and approval of the merger agreement.
Opinion of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC to EMJ’s Board of Directors
      Credit Suisse has acted as financial advisor to EMJ in connection with the merger.
      In connection with the engagement of Credit Suisse, EMJ’s board of directors requested that Credit Suisse evaluate the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of EMJ common stock (other

52


Table of Contents

than Reliance and its subsidiaries and the Kelso Funds and their respective affiliates), of the merger consideration to be received by those stockholders pursuant to the merger. On January 17, 2006, at a meeting of EMJ’s board of directors held to evaluate the merger, Credit Suisse delivered to such board of directors an oral opinion, which opinion was confirmed by delivery of a written opinion dated the same date, to the effect that, as of that date and based on and subject to the matters described in its opinion, the merger consideration to be received pursuant to the merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of EMJ common stock (other than Reliance and its subsidiaries and the Kelso Funds and their respective affiliates).
      The full text of Credit Suisse’s written opinion to EMJ’s board of directors, dated January 17, 2006, which sets forth the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered and limitations of the review undertaken, is included as Annex C to this proxy statement/ prospectus and is incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/ prospectus. Holders of EMJ common stock are encouraged to read this opinion carefully and in its entirety. Credit Suisse’s opinion was provided to EMJ’s board of directors in connection with its evaluation of the merger consideration and relates only to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the merger consideration to be received by the holders of EMJ common stock (other than Reliance and its subsidiaries and the Kelso Funds and their respective affiliates), and does not address any other aspect or implication of the merger or any other agreement, arrangement or understanding entered into in connection with the merger or otherwise, and does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder as to how such stockholder should vote or act with respect to any matter relating to the proposed merger. The summary of Credit Suisse’s opinion in this proxy statement/ prospectus is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the opinion.
      In arriving at its opinion, Credit Suisse reviewed the merger agreement, certain related agreements and publicly available business and financial information relating to EMJ and Reliance. Credit Suisse also reviewed other information relating to EMJ and Reliance, including financial forecasts provided to or discussed with Credit Suisse by the managements of EMJ and Reliance, and met with the managements of EMJ and Reliance to discuss the businesses and prospects of EMJ and Reliance. Credit Suisse also considered certain financial and stock market data of EMJ and Reliance, and compared that data with similar data for other publicly held companies in businesses Credit Suisse deemed similar to those of EMJ and Reliance and considered, to the extent publicly available, the financial terms of certain other business combinations and other transactions which have recently been effected or announced. Credit Suisse also considered such other information, financial studies, analyses and investigations and financial, economic and market criteria that it deemed relevant.
      In connection with its review, Credit Suisse did not assume any responsibility for independent verification of any of the information that it reviewed or considered and relied on that information being complete and accurate in all material respects. With respect to the financial forecasts relating to EMJ and Reliance that Credit Suisse reviewed, Credit Suisse was advised by the managements of EMJ and Reliance, and assumed, that such forecasts were reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of the managements of EMJ and Reliance as to the future financial performance of EMJ and Reliance, respectively. Credit Suisse also assumed, with EMJ’s consent, that the merger would qualify as a reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code. Credit Suisse further assumed, with EMJ’s consent, that, in the course of obtaining any necessary regulatory or third party consents, approvals or agreements in connection with the merger, no modification, delay, limitation, restriction or condition will be imposed that would have an adverse effect on EMJ, Reliance or the contemplated benefits of the merger and that the merger would be consummated in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement without waiver, modification or amendment of any material term, condition or agreement thereof. In addition, Credit Suisse was not requested to make, and it did not make, an independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of EMJ or Reliance, nor was Credit Suisse furnished with any evaluations or appraisals. Credit Suisse’s opinion was necessarily based on information available to it, and financial, economic, market and other conditions as they existed and could be evaluated, on the date of Credit Suisse’s opinion. Credit Suisse did not express any opinion as to what the actual value of Reliance common stock will be when issued to holders of EMJ

53


Table of Contents

common stock pursuant to the merger or the prices at which Reliance common stock will trade at any time. Credit Suisse’s opinion did not address the relative merits of the merger as compared to other business strategies or transactions that might be available to EMJ or EMJ’s underlying business decision to proceed with the merger.
      In preparing its opinion to EMJ’s board of directors, Credit Suisse performed a variety of financial and comparative analyses, including those described below. The summary of Credit Suisse’s analyses described below is not a complete description of the analyses underlying its opinion. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process involving various determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis and the application of those methods to the particular circumstances and, therefore, a fairness opinion is not readily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. In arriving at its opinion, Credit Suisse made qualitative judgments as to the significance and relevance of each analysis and factor that it considered. Credit Suisse arrived at its ultimate opinion based on the results of all analyses undertaken by it and assessed as a whole and did not draw, in isolation, conclusions from or with regard to any one factor or method of analysis. Accordingly, Credit Suisse believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its analyses and factors or focusing on information presented in tabular format, without considering all analyses and factors or the narrative description of the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of the processes underlying its analyses and opinion.
      In its analyses, Credit Suisse considered industry performance, general business, economic, market and financial conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the control of EMJ and Reliance. No company, transaction or business used in Credit Suisse’s analyses as a comparison is identical to EMJ, Reliance or the proposed merger, and an evaluation of the results of those analyses is not entirely mathematical. Rather, the analyses involve complex considerations and judgments concerning financial and operating characteristics and other factors that could affect the acquisition, public trading or other values of the companies, business segments or transactions analyzed. The estimates contained in Credit Suisse’s analyses and the ranges of valuations resulting from any particular analysis are not necessarily indicative of actual values or predictive of future results or values, which may be significantly more or less favorable than those suggested by the analyses. In addition, analyses relating to the value of businesses or securities do not purport to be appraisals or to reflect the prices at which businesses or securities actually may be sold. Accordingly, the estimates used in, and the results derived from, Credit Suisse’s analyses are inherently subject to substantial uncertainty.
      Credit Suisse’s opinion and financial analyses were only one of many factors considered by EMJ’s board of directors in its evaluation of the proposed merger and should not be viewed as determinative of the views of EMJ’s board of directors or management with respect to the merger or the merger consideration. Although Credit Suisse evaluated the merger consideration from a financial point of view, it was not requested to, and did not, determine or recommend the specific consideration to be paid in the transaction.
Analyses performed in Connection with the Preparation of the Fairness Opinion by Credit Suisse
      The following is a summary of the material financial analyses Credit Suisse presented to EMJ’s board of directors on January 17, 2006, in connection with the merger. The financial analyses summarized below include information presented in tabular format. In order to fully understand Credit Suisse’s financial analyses, the tables must be read together with the text of each summary. The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the financial analyses. Considering the data in the tables below without considering the full narrative description of the financial analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of Credit Suisse’s financial analyses.

54


Table of Contents

EMJ Analyses
Selected Companies Analysis
      Using publicly available information, Credit Suisse reviewed the market values and trading multiples of the following publicly traded North American metals service center companies:
     
North American Metals Service Center Companies    
     
• Russel Metals Inc.
   
• Ryerson Inc.
   
• A.M. Castle & Co.
   
• Novamerican Steel Inc.
   
• Olympic Steel, Inc.
   
      Multiples were based on closing stock prices on January 11, 2006. Estimated data for the selected companies were based on publicly available research analysts’ estimates and public filings. Credit Suisse compared enterprise values, calculated as equity value plus net debt, as multiples of calendar years 2005 and 2006 estimated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, commonly referred to as EBITDA. Credit Suisse also compared equity values per share as multiples of calendar years 2005 and 2006 estimated earnings per share. Credit Suisse then applied a range of selected multiples described above for the selected companies to corresponding financial data of EMJ. Estimated data for EMJ were based on internal estimates of EMJ’s management. This analysis indicated the following approximate implied per share equity reference range for EMJ, as compared to the merger consideration:
     
Implied per Share Equity    
Reference Range for EMJ   Merger Consideration
     
$12.27 — $15.04   $13.00
Selected Transactions Analysis
      Using publicly available information, Credit Suisse reviewed information relating to the following selected acquisitions and announced offers to acquire, which Credit Suisse deemed relevant to arriving at its opinion:
     
Acquiror   Target
     
• Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
  • Chapel Steel Corp.
• Apollo Management, L.P.
  • Metals USA, Inc.
• Ryerson Inc.
  • Integris Metals (Alcoa/BHP-B)
• Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
  • Precision Strip, Inc.
• Russel Metals Inc.
  • Acier Leroux Inc.
• Samuel, Son & Co.
  • Renown Steel (Slater Steel)
• Balli Group plc
  • Klöckner & Co. (E.ON AG)
• Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
  • Pitt–Des Moines (Steel Service Center Division)
      Multiples for the selected transactions were based on publicly available financial information at the time of announcement of the relevant transaction. Credit Suisse compared enterprise values in the selected transactions as multiples of the latest 12 months revenue and EBITDA. Credit Suisse then applied ranges of selected multiples derived from the selected transactions to corresponding financial data of EMJ. Estimated data for EMJ were based on internal estimates of EMJ’s management. This analysis indicated the following implied per share equity reference range for EMJ, as compared to the merger consideration:
     
Implied per Share Equity    
Reference Range for EMJ   Merger Consideration
     
$10.85 — $13.59   $13.00

55


Table of Contents

Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
      Credit Suisse calculated the estimated present value of the stand-alone, unlevered, after-tax free cash flows that EMJ could generate over calendar years 2006 through 2010 and the enterprise value of EMJ at the end of that period. Estimated financial data for EMJ were based on internal estimates of EMJ’s management. Credit Suisse also calculated a range of estimated terminal values (estimated value of future cash flow from an asset at a particular point in time in the future) for EMJ by multiplying EMJ’s calendar year 2010 estimated EBITDA by selected multiples ranging from 5.00x to 6.50x. The estimated after-tax free cash flows and terminal values were then discounted to the present value using discount rates of 12.5% to 13.5%. This analysis indicated the following approximate implied per share equity reference range for EMJ, as compared to the merger consideration:
     
Implied per Share Equity    
Reference Range for EMJ   Merger Consideration
     
$11.53 — $14.86   $13.00
Reliance Analyses
Selected Companies Analysis
      Using publicly available information, Credit Suisse reviewed the market values and trading multiples of North American metals service center companies referenced above under the heading “EMJ Analyses — Selected Companies Analysis.” Multiples were based on closing stock prices on January 11, 2006. Estimated data for the selected companies were based on publicly available research analysts’ estimates and public filings. Credit Suisse compared enterprise values as multiples of calendar years 2005 and 2006 estimated EBITDA. Credit Suisse also compared equity values per share as multiples of calendar years 2005 and 2006 estimated earnings per share. Credit Suisse then applied a range of selected multiples described above for the selected companies to corresponding financial data of Reliance. Estimated data for Reliance were based on internal estimates of Reliance’s management. This analysis indicated the following approximate implied per share equity reference range for Reliance, as compared to the closing price of Reliance common stock on January 11, 2006:
     
Implied per Share Equity   Closing Price of Reliance
Reference Range for Reliance   Common Stock on January 11, 2006
     
$63.37 — $77.81   $65.49
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
      Credit Suisse calculated the estimated present value of the stand-alone, unlevered, after-tax free cash flows that Reliance could generate over calendar years 2006 through 2008 and the enterprise value of Reliance at the end of that period. Estimated financial data for Reliance were based on internal estimates of Reliance’s management. Credit Suisse also calculated a range of estimated terminal values for Reliance by multiplying Reliance’s calendar year 2008 estimated EBITDA by selected multiples ranging from 6.50x to 7.50x. The estimated after-tax free cash flows and terminal values were then discounted to the present value using discount rates of 11.5% to 12.5%. This analysis indicated the following approximate implied per share equity reference range for Reliance, as compared to the closing price of Reliance common stock on January 11, 2006:
     
Implied per Share Equity   Closing Price of Reliance
Reference Range for Reliance   Common Stock on January 11, 2006
     
$55.55 — $65.48   $65.49
Miscellaneous
      EMJ selected Credit Suisse based on Credit Suisse’s experience and reputation, and its familiarity with EMJ and its business. Credit Suisse is an internationally recognized investment banking firm and is regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses and securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions,

56


Table of Contents

leveraged buyouts, negotiated underwritings, competitive biddings, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private placements and valuations for corporate and other purposes.
      EMJ has agreed to pay Credit Suisse customary fees for its financial advisory services in connection with the merger, a significant portion of which is contingent upon completion of the merger. EMJ also has agreed to reimburse Credit Suisse for its expenses, including reasonable fees and expenses of legal counsel and any other advisor retained by Credit Suisse, and to indemnify Credit Suisse and related parties against liabilities, including liabilities under the federal securities laws, arising out of its engagement.
      Credit Suisse and its affiliates in the past have provided, are currently providing, and in the future may provide, investment banking and other financial services to EMJ, Reliance, the private investment firms whose affiliates are EMJ stockholders, and their respective affiliates (including having acted as co-lead underwriter in connection with EMJ’s initial public offering in April 2005), unrelated to the proposed merger, for which services Credit Suisse and its affiliates have received, and would expect to receive, compensation. Credit Suisse is a full service securities firm, engaged in securities trading and brokerage activities as well as providing investment banking and other financial services. In the ordinary course of business, Credit Suisse and its affiliates may acquire, hold or sell, for its or its affiliates’ own accounts and the accounts of customers, equity, debt and other securities and financial instruments (including bank loans and other obligations) of EMJ, Reliance and any other company that may be involved in the merger and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities, as well as provide investment banking and other financial services to such companies. In addition, funds managed or advised by Credit Suisse or one or more of its affiliates have investments in funds managed or advised by affiliates of certain EMJ stockholders, including Kelso Investment Associates IV, L.P.
Opinion of Duff & Phelps Securities, LLC to EMJ’s Board of Directors
      On December 14, 2005, EMJ’s board of directors retained Duff & Phelps to provide financial advisory services with respect to the merger and to render an opinion as to the fairness of the merger, from a financial point of view, to EMJ’s stockholders other than Reliance, the Kelso Funds, and their respective subsidiaries and affiliates. On January 13, 2006, Duff & Phelps delivered a draft written presentation to EMJ’s board of directors regarding its fairness analysis. On January 17, 2006, Duff & Phelps participated in a meeting and conference call with the board of directors to discuss its previously transmitted written presentation and to answer any questions regarding its analysis and conclusions. Additionally, on January 17, 2006, Duff & Phelps delivered its final presentation and written opinion letter to the board of directors stating, in part, that as of January 17, 2006, and based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth in its opinion, the merger was fair to the EMJ stockholders, other than the excluded persons.
      The full text of Duff & Phelps’ opinion, dated as of January 17, 2006, which is attached as Annex D to this proxy statement/ prospectus, sets forth, among other things, the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered, and limitations of the review undertaken by Duff & Phelps, which are described below. You are urged to, and should, read Duff & Phelps’ opinion carefully and in its entirety.
      In connection with its opinion, Duff & Phelps made such reviews, analyses and inquiries, as it deemed necessary and appropriate under the circumstances. Duff & Phelps’ due diligence with regard to the merger included, but was not limited to, the items summarized below.
  •  Attended a due diligence meeting with individuals from:
  •  EMJ and Reliance management;
 
  •  Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, legal counsel to EMJ;
 
  •  Credit Suisse; and
 
  •  UBS Securities LLC, financial advisor to Reliance.
  •  Held additional discussions with EMJ management.

57


Table of Contents

  •  Reviewed a draft of the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated January 16, 2006.
 
  •  Reviewed a draft of the Voting Agreement dated January 13, 2006.
 
  •  Reviewed EMJ’s financial statements and projections, including:
  •  Annual reports on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2002 through 2005;
 
  •  Quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the six-month periods ended September 29, 2004 and September 28, 2005;
 
  •  Internal financial reports for the eight months ended November 30, 2005; and
 
  •  Financial projections prepared by EMJ management for the last quarter of fiscal 2006 and for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2007 through 2011.
  •  Reviewed Reliance’s financial statements and projections, including:
  •  Annual reports on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2002 through 2004;
 
  •  Quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2005; and
 
  •  Financial projections prepared by Reliance management for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2005 through 2008.
  •  Reviewed other operating, financial and legal information regarding EMJ and Reliance.
 
  •  Reviewed and analyzed market trading prices and indicated valuation metrics for EMJ and Reliance.
 
  •  Reviewed and analyzed market trading prices and indicated valuation metrics for comparable public companies.
 
  •  Reviewed and analyzed valuation metrics and premiums paid in comparable merger transactions.
 
  •  Reviewed pertinent economic and industry information.
 
  •  Reviewed and prepared other studies, analyses and investigations as we deemed appropriate.
      Duff & Phelps also took into account its assessment of general economic, market and financial conditions, and its experience in securities and business valuation, in general, and with respect to transactions similar to the proposed merger. In particular, Duff & Phelps did not make any independent evaluation, appraisal or physical inspection of EMJ’s solvency or of any specific assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise). Duff & Phelps’ opinion should not be construed as a credit rating, solvency opinion, an analysis of EMJ’s credit worthiness or otherwise as tax advice or as accounting advice. In rendering its opinion, Duff & Phelps relied upon the fact that EMJ’s board of directors and EMJ have been advised by counsel as to all legal matters with respect to the merger, including whether all procedures required by law to be taken in connection with the merger have been duly, validly and timely taken and Duff & Phelps did not make, and assumes no responsibility to make, any representation, or render any opinion, as to any legal matter.
      In preparing its forecasts, performing its analysis and rendering its opinion with respect to the merger, Duff & Phelps: (1) relied upon the accuracy, completeness, and fair presentation of all information, data, advice, opinions and representations obtained from public sources or provided to it from private sources, including EMJ and Reliance management, and did not attempt to independently verify such information, (2) assumed that any estimates, evaluations and projections furnished to Duff & Phelps were reasonably prepared and based upon the last currently available information and good faith judgment of the person furnishing the same and (3) assumed that the final versions of all documents reviewed by them in draft form conform in all material respects to the drafts reviewed. Duff & Phelps’ opinion further assumes that information supplied and representations made by EMJ and Reliance management are substantially accurate regarding EMJ, Reliance and the merger. Neither EMJ management nor EMJ’s board of

58


Table of Contents

directors placed any limitations upon Duff & Phelps with respect to the procedures followed or factors considered by Duff & Phelps in rendering its opinion.
      In its analysis and in connection with the preparation of its opinion, Duff & Phelps made numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance, general business, market and economic conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the control of any party involved in the merger. Duff & Phelps has also assumed that all of the conditions precedent required to implement the merger will be satisfied and that the merger will be completed in accordance with the merger agreement that was provided for its review.
      The basis and methodology for Duff & Phelps’ opinion have been designed specifically for the express purposes of EMJ’s board of directors and may not translate to any other purposes.
      To the extent that any of the foregoing assumptions or any of the facts on which Duff & Phelps’ opinion is based proves to be untrue in any material respect, its opinion cannot and should not be relied upon.
      Duff & Phelps prepared its opinion effective as of January 17, 2006. The opinion is necessarily based upon market, economic, financial and other conditions as they existed and could be evaluated as of such date, and Duff & Phelps disclaims any undertaking or obligation to advise any person of any change in any fact or matter affecting the opinion which may come or be brought to the attention of Duff & Phelps after such date.
      Duff & Phelps’ opinion should not be construed as creating any fiduciary duty on Duff & Phelps’ part to any party.
      Duff & Phelps’ opinion is not a recommendation as to how any stockholder should vote or act with respect to any matters relating to the merger, or whether to proceed with the merger or any related transaction, nor does it indicate that the consideration received is the best possible attainable under any circumstances. The decision as to whether to proceed with the merger or any related transaction may depend on an assessment of factors unrelated to the financial analysis on which Duff & Phelps’ opinion is based. As a result, the opinion and presentation of Duff & Phelps was only one of many factors taken into consideration by EMJ’s board of directors in making its determination with respect to the merger.
      The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process and is not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. In addition, the process of preparing a fairness opinion necessarily requires a broad range of subjective judgments with respect to appropriate comparable companies, appropriate multiples of various selected financial data, appropriate discount rates and other financial and other factors. Analyses and estimates of the values of companies do not purport to be appraisals or necessarily reflect the prices at which companies or their securities may actually be sold.
      In preparing its opinion, Duff & Phelps performed certain financial and comparative analyses summarized in the following paragraphs. Duff & Phelps believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of such analyses and the factors it considered, without considering all such analyses and factors, could create an incomplete view of the analyses and the process underlying its opinion. While the conclusions reached in connection with each analysis were considered carefully by Duff & Phelps in arriving at its opinion, Duff & Phelps made various subjective judgments in arriving at its opinion and did not consider it practicable to, nor did it attempt to, assign relative weights to the individual analyses and specific factors considered in reaching its opinion. Although these paragraphs include some information in tabular format, those tables are not intended to stand alone, and must be read together with the full text of each summary and the limitations and qualifications in the opinion.
      Duff & Phelps’ analysis was comprised of the following components: (1) an analysis of the merger structure and the consideration to be received by the EMJ stockholders, (2) an analysis of historical market trading prices and volume for EMJ and Reliance common stock, (3) a fundamental valuation analysis of EMJ common stock, (4) a fundamental valuation analysis of Reliance common stock, (5) a

59


Table of Contents

fundamental valuation analysis of the post-transaction combined company and (6) a premiums paid analysis.
Analysis of Merger Structure and Consideration
      Duff & Phelps estimated the total equity value of the merger, including the purchase of outstanding common stock, Reliance’s guarantee of the special contribution obligation, the cash payment for certain EMJ options, and the assumption of the remaining EMJ options, at approximately $696 million. After including the value of debt assumed, net of cash and the cash surrender value of the company owned life insurance, or COLI, Duff & Phelps estimated the total enterprise value of the merger at approximately $944 million. These figures were then used by Duff & Phelps to calculate implied valuation multiples as discussed below.
      In addition, Duff & Phelps observed that the collar provided EMJ stockholders with a certain amount of protection against movements in the price of Reliance stock, and that movements in Reliance’s stock price above or below the bounds of the collar would result in an increase or decrease, respectively, in the total value of consideration to be received and the amount of the premium over EMJ’s pre-announcement trading price.
Historical Stock Trading
      Duff & Phelps reviewed the historical trading prices and volume of EMJ stock since its initial public offering in April 2005. In particular, Duff & Phelps observed that EMJ stock did not have a high level of liquidity, with daily trading averaging approximately 90,000 shares per day over the 90 days preceding its analysis, or only 0.2% of total shares outstanding and 0.5% of the public float. Duff & Phelps also observed that, since its initial public offering date, EMJ shares had traded in a range of $6.70 to $10.69 per share, and that the $13.00 per share purchase price was well in excess of EMJ’s historical trading range.
      With respect to Reliance, Duff & Phelps observed that its stock was substantially more liquid than EMJ’s, with average daily trading of approximately 301,000 shares during the 90 days preceding its analysis, representing 0.9% of shares outstanding and 1.1% of Reliance’s public float. Duff & Phelps also observed that Reliance’s stock price had increased significantly since July 2005, reaching an all-time high of $67.06 on January 10, 2006. However, Duff & Phelps also noted that the increased stock price between July 2005 and January 2006 was generally in line with the trading pattern of a market value weighted index of steel service center stocks identified by Duff & Phelps and that, even with the substantial increase over the last six months, Reliance stock had actually underperformed the aforementioned index over the past three years.
Market Valuation Multiples
      Duff & Phelps next presented an analysis of valuation multiples as indicated by a group of selected comparable companies, and also as indicated by a group of identified steel industry merger and acquisition transactions.
      Comparable Public Company Analysis. Duff & Phelps’ comparable company analysis was based on a selected group of comparable public companies. No company used in this analysis is identical to EMJ or Reliance, and, accordingly, a comparable company analysis involves complex and subjective considerations and judgments concerning differences in financial and operating characteristics of businesses and other factors that affect trading prices of the various companies being compared.
      In the selection of comparable public companies, Duff & Phelps used multiple databases to identify public companies that are the most similar to EMJ and Reliance from an investment perspective. The public companies selected by Duff & Phelps generally have similar product lines, customer bases or other business attributes which would cause an investor to group these companies in the same broad industry

60


Table of Contents

class for investment purposes. Duff & Phelps ultimately included the 12 companies listed below in the comparison group based on their investment risks, products and services offered and target markets:
             
• A.M. Castle Co.

• Olympic Steel Inc.

• Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
 
• Russel Metals Inc.

• Ryerson Inc.

• Commercial Metals Co.
 
• Friedman Industries Inc.

• Gibraltar Industries Inc.

• Novamerican Steel Inc.
 
• Quanex Corp.

• Steel Technologies Inc.

• Worthington Industries Inc.
      Based on publicly reported financial data as well as published earnings estimates for each of the selected comparable companies, Duff & Phelps analyzed certain valuation metrics, which are summarized below:
 
                                                                                 
                    Enterprise Value as a Multiple of
                Stock Price as a    
                Multiple of            
                    EBITDA   EBIT    
    Equity   Enterprise   LTM   LTM   Proj.           LTM
    Value   Value   Revs.   EPS   EPS   LTM   Proj.   LTM   Proj.   Revs.
                                         
    (All $ in millions — valuations based on 1/13/06 closing prices)
High
  $ 2,451     $ 2,918     $ 6,573       14.7x       14.3x       8.1x       7.9x       10.4x       9.6x       0.87x  
Low
  $ 42     $ 38     $ 183       8.0x       7.1x       4.0x       4.8x       4.5x       6.0x       0.21x  
Mean
  $ 970     $ 1,211     $ 2,318       10.2x       11.2x       6.0x       6.0x       7.0x       8.0x       0.51x  
Median
  $ 699     $ 1,173     $ 1,548       9.3x       11.5x       5.8x       5.8x       6.7x       7.8x       0.50x  
 
LTM = Latest 12 months
EBITDA = Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
EBIT = Earnings before interest and taxes
Enterprise Value = Stock price times shares outstanding plus preferred stock, minority interest and interest-bearing debt minus cash and equivalents
All earnings measures were adjusted for special items.
      Comparable Transaction Analysis. Similar to the comparable public company analysis, Duff & Phelps used multiple databases and resources to identify comparable controlling interest transactions involving companies with similar product lines, customers or other business attributes. Duff & Phelps identified relevant transactions that were announced during the past three years and for which adequate information was available to derive meaningful valuation multiples. The 12 identified transactions are listed below:
     
 
Target   Buyer
 
Dofasco, Inc.(1)
  ThyssenKrupp AG
Roanoke Electric Steel Corp.(1)
  Steel Dynamics, Inc.
Alabama Metal Industries Corp.
  Gibraltar Industries, Inc.
Chapel Steel Corp.
  Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
Metals USA, Inc.
  Apollo Advisors LP
Harvest Partners, Inc./Edgen Corp.
  Jefferies Group, Inc.
Integris Metals Corp.
  Ryerson Inc.
International Steel Group, Inc.
  Ispat International NV
Commonwealth Industries, Inc.
  IMCO Recycling, Inc.
Arcelor SA/J&F Steel LLC
  Ryerson Inc.
Precision Strip Inc.
  Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
Leroux Steel Inc.
  Russel Metals Inc.

61


Table of Contents

 
(1)  Pending transaction
      Based on reported pricing and financial data regarding the identified transactions, Duff & Phelps analyzed certain valuation metrics, which are summarized below:
                                 
(all $ in millions)                
 
    Enterprise Value as a
    Multiple of
    Enterprise    
    Value   Sales   EBITDA   EBIT
                 
High
  $ 4,200       2.02x       8.9x       13.9x  
Low
  $ 70       0.16x       3.4x       3.7x  
Mean
  $ 932       0.63x       5.7x       7.6x  
Median
  $ 243       0.47x       5.2x       6.9x  
Fundamental Valuation Analysis of EMJ
      Duff & Phelps’ valuation analysis of EMJ common stock was based on: (1) a discounted cash flow analysis, and (2) a calculation of the valuation multiples implied by the merger pricing and a comparison of such implied multiples with the comparable public company multiples and the comparable transaction multiples summarized above.
      Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. Duff & Phelps performed a discounted cash flow analysis to derive indications of total enterprise value and equity value. A discounted cash flow analysis is designed to provide insight into the intrinsic value of a business based on its projected earnings and capital requirements as well as the net present value of projected debt-free cash flows. Duff & Phelps based its discounted cash flow analysis on projections of debt-free cash flows of EMJ for the last quarter of fiscal 2006 and the fiscal years ending March 31, 2007 through 2011. These projections were prepared by EMJ management and were not independently verified by Duff & Phelps. In its analysis, Duff & Phelps used discount rates ranging from 12.5% to 13.5% to reflect the overall risk associated with EMJ’s operations and projected financial performance. Duff & Phelps calculated a terminal value at the end of 2011 using two methods: a constant growth dividend discount model, which incorporated a range of perpetuity growth rates from 1.5% to 2.5%, and the capitalization of EBITDA method using an EBITDA multiple in the range of 4.5x to 5.5x.
      Based on its discounted cash flow analysis, Duff & Phelps estimated total enterprise value ranging from $795 million to $930 million. From its estimated enterprise value, Duff & Phelps then deducted EMJ’s debt — net of cash and the cash surrender value of the COLI — and the value of outstanding stock options, to arrive at a fully diluted equity value ranging from $520 million to $646 million. Finally, dividing its concluded fully diluted common equity value by 50.96 million common shares (including the special contribution shares) resulted in rounded values ranging from $10.00 per share to $13.00 per share, as compared with the merger price of $13.00 per share.
      Implied Transaction Multiples. Based on its estimates of total equity value and total enterprise value under the terms of the merger, as set forth above, Duff & Phelps calculated the implied valuation multiples for the merger. In calculating its implied valuation multiples, Duff & Phelps adjusted EMJ’s historical and projected financial results to remove the effect of extraordinary and non-recurring items, as well as any financial statement effects of the COLI. Duff & Phelps then compared the implied valuation

62


Table of Contents

multiples with the median valuation multiples indicated by the comparable public companies and the comparable transactions. The results of Duff & Phelps analysis are summarized below:
                                   
         
    Enterprise Value as Multiple of    
         
    Revenues   EBITDA   EBIT   Equity Value/
        Net ncome
         
EMJ — Implied Multiples
                               
 
LTM 9/28/05
    0.55x       5.6x       6.1x       9.7x  
 
Projected FYE March 2006
    0.54x       5.3x       5.6x       8.3x  
 
Projected FYE March 2007
    0.55x       5.2x       5.6x       8.2x  
Comparable Public Companies — Median Multiples
                               
 
LTM
    0.50x       5.8x       6.7x       9.3x  
 
Projected Next Fiscal Year
    NA       5.8x       7.8x       11.5x  
Comparable Transactions — Median Multiples
                               
 
Latest Available Financial Results
    0.47x       5.2x       6.9x       NA  
      Duff & Phelps observed that the implied multiples of enterprise value to revenue, for trailing performance and projected performance are above the indicated median multiples for the comparable public companies and the comparable transactions for each period. With respect to the multiples of enterprise value to EBITDA, EMJ’s implied multiples on a trailing and projected basis are at or above the median multiple for the identified transactions and slightly below the median multiples for the comparable public companies. Duff & Phelps further observed that, while the implied multiples of EBIT are below those of the comparable companies and identified transactions, the implied multiple of trailing 12 month net income was above the median for the comparable companies. Based on these observations, and taken as a whole, Duff & Phelps determined that the valuation multiples implied by the merger price supported a determination of fairness.
Fundamental Valuation Analysis of Reliance
      As with EMJ, Duff & Phelps’ valuation analysis of Reliance was based on: (1) a discounted cash flow analysis and (2) a comparison of Reliance’s market-derived valuation multiples with the comparable public company multiples summarized above.
      Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. Duff & Phelps based its discounted cash flow analysis on projections of debt-free cash flows of Reliance for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2006 through 2008. These projections were prepared by Reliance management and were not independently verified by Duff & Phelps. In its analysis, Duff & Phelps used discount rates ranging from 10.0% to 11.0% to reflect the overall risk associated with Reliance’s operations and projected financial performance. Duff & Phelps calculated a terminal value at the end of 2008 using two methods: a constant growth dividend discount model, which incorporated a range of perpetuity growth rates from 2.5% to 3.5%, and the capitalization of EBITDA method using an EBITDA multiple in the range of 6.5x to 7.5x. Duff & Phelps used lower discount rates and higher terminal value assumptions as compared with its analysis of EMJ to reflect the stronger history of long-term growth and steady profitability as well as the higher market valuation multiples at which Reliance normally trades relative to its peers.
      Based on its discounted cash flow analysis Duff & Phelps estimated a total enterprise value of $2.27 billion to $2.76 billion. From its estimated enterprise value, Duff & Phelps then deducted Reliance’s debt, net of cash, and the value of outstanding stock options, to arrive at a fully diluted equity value ranging from $1.88 billion to $2.35 billion. Finally, dividing its concluded fully diluted common equity value by 33.1 million common shares resulted in rounded values ranging from $57.00 per share to $71.00 per share, as compared with Reliance’s most recent closing price of $64.80 as of January 13, 2006, the last full trading day prior to Duff & Phelps’ presentation to EMJ’s board of directors. Duff & Phelps also observed that the range of values resulting from its discounted cash flow analysis generally supported the price range of $53.86 per share to $72.86 per share comprising the collar.

63


Table of Contents

      Market Multiples Analysis. As part of its analysis of the value of Reliance common stock, Duff & Phelps compared its current market valuation multiples with those of the selected peer companies. The results of that analysis are summarized in the table below:
(all $ in millions - valuations based on 1/13/06 closing prices)
                                                                                 
 
    Stock Price as    
    a Multiple of   Enterprise Value as a Multiple of
         
        EBITDA   EBIT    
    Equity   Enterprise   LTM   LTM   Proj.           LTM
    Value   Value   Revs.   EPS   EPS   LTM   Proj.   LTM   Proj.   Revs.
                                         
Reliance
  $ 2,144     $ 2,568     $ 3,241       11.4x       12.8x       7.0x       7.9x       8.0x       9.6x       0.79x  
Comparable Public Companies (includes Reliance)
 
High
  $ 2,451     $ 2,918     $ 6,573       14.7x       14.3x       8.1x       7.9x       10.4x       9.6x       0.87x  
Low
  $ 42     $ 38     $ 183       8.0x       7.1x       4.0x       4.8x       4.5x       6.0x       0.21x  
 
Mean
  $ 970     $ 1,211     $ 2,318       10.2x       11.2x       6.0x       6.0x       7.0x       8.0x       0.51x  
Median
  $ 699     $ 1,173     $ 1,548       9.3x       11.5x       5.8x       5.8x       6.7x       7.8x       0.50x  
      Based on its analysis, Duff & Phelps observed that, by every metric examined, Reliance was trading at a price that represented a total valuation above the mean and median and, in some cases, representing the highest multiple of all of the peer companies. However, Duff & Phelps also analyzed historical financial and market trading data and calculated Reliance’s EBITDA multiple and price-to-earnings multiple as of the end of each calendar quarter for the past ten years. Duff & Phelps’ analysis revealed that, as of the end of 35 out of the last 40 quarters, Reliance traded at an EBITDA multiple that represented a premium to the industry median and that, over the 10-year period, Reliance’s average quarter-end EBITDA multiple was 8.8x as compared with the average of 6.6x for the comparable public companies. Duff & Phelps’ analysis revealed similar findings with respect to Reliance’s price-to-earnings multiple, with Reliance trading at a premium as of the end of 34 out of 40 quarters and a 10-year average multiple of 15.7x as compared with the average of 11.8x for the comparable public companies. Therefore, Duff & Phelps concluded that the premium multiple at which Reliance was trading as of the date of its analysis did not necessarily indicate that Reliance stock was overvalued in the marketplace.
Fundamental Valuation Analysis of the Post-Transaction Combined Company
      Duff & Phelps’ valuation analysis of the post-transaction combined company was based on: (1) a discounted cash flow analysis, and (2) an application of selected valuation multiples to pro forma earnings measures for the post-transaction combined company.
      Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. Duff & Phelps used the fiscal year projections from its analysis of EMJ and adjusted them to a calendar year basis, and then combined the adjusted EMJ projection with the financial projections provided by Reliance management to derive a combined company projection for calendar 2006 through 2008. As with the stand-alone analysis of Reliance, Duff & Phelps used discount rates ranging from 10.0% to 11.0% to reflect the overall risk associated with the combined company’s operations and projected financial performance. Duff & Phelps calculated a terminal value at the end of 2008 using two methods: a constant growth dividend discount model, which incorporated a range of perpetuity growth rates from 2.5% to 3.5%, and the capitalization of EBITDA method using an EBITDA multiple in the range of 6.5x to 7.5x. The discounted cash flow analysis of the post-transaction combined company resulted in total enterprise value indications ranging from $3.36 billion to $4.31 billion.
      Market Multiples Analysis. Based on actual reported financial results and the financial projections discussed above, Duff & Phelps derived pro forma trailing 12 month and calendar 2006 EBITDA, EBIT

64


Table of Contents

and Net Income, and then selected valuation multiples to apply to each of these measures of income. Duff & Phelps’ market multiples analysis is summarized below:
                                         
            Selected Range of   Total Debt       Indicated Range
            Based on Actual Reported   Financial Results   and t   he Financial Projections
                         
    Pro Forma       Valuation Multiples   (Net of Cash)       of Enterprise Values
     
        (rounded)
EBITDA — LTM
  $ 536,275     x     6.50x - 7.50x             =   $ 3,486,000 - $4,022,000  
EBITDA — Projected 2006
  $ 557,467     x     6.50x - 7.50x             =   $ 3,624,000 - $4,181,000  
EBIT — LTM
  $ 478,662     x     7.50x - 8.50x             =   $ 3,590,000 - $4,069,000  
EBIT — Projected 2006
  $ 500,917     x     7.50x - 8.50x             =   $ 3,757,000 - $4,258,000  
Net Income — LTM
  $ 256,544     x     11.00x - 12.00x       954,695     =   $ 3,777,000 - $4,033,000  
Net Income — Projected 2006
  $ 273,121     x     10.50x - 11.50x       954,695     =   $ 3,822,000 - $4,096,000  
      Valuation Conclusion. As outlined above, the Duff & Phelps’ market multiples analysis resulted in an indicated range of enterprise values from $3.49 billion to $4.26 billion. Combining the results of the market multiples analysis with the discounted cash flow analysis, Duff & Phelps concluded that a range of $3.36 billion to $4.07 billion represented a reasonable range of total enterprise value for the post-transaction combined company. Duff & Phelps then deducted its estimate of pro forma post-transaction debt (net of cash) and the value of post-transaction Reliance options to arrive at a fully diluted common equity value ranging from $2.35 billion to $3.03 billion. Finally, dividing by Duff & Phelps’ estimate of 38.4 million post-transaction shares resulted in an estimated value ranging from $61.00 per share to $79.00 per share, representing an increase from Reliance’s valuation range on a standalone basis.
Premiums Paid Analysis
      Duff & Phelps identified acquisitions announced during the last two years involving publicly traded steel industry targets, excluding bankrupt and distressed target companies, and calculated the premiums paid or offered in those transactions. Six relevant transactions were identified and are shown below:
     
 
Target   Buyer
 
Dofasco, Inc.(1)(2)
  ThyssenKrupp AG
Dofasco, Inc.(1)(2)
  Arcelor SA
Roanoke Electric Steel Corp.(1)
  Steel Dynamics, Inc.
Metals USA, Inc. 
  Apollo Advisors LP
International Steel Group, Inc. 
  Mittal Steel Company NV/ Ispat International NV
Commonwealth Industries, Inc. 
  Aleris International, Inc.
 
(1)  Pending transaction
(2)  Dofasco has received competing bids
      Based on its analysis of the transactions identified above, its analysis of the merger, and market data available through January 13, 2006 (the latest full trading day prior to Duff & Phelps’ presentation to EMJ’s board of directors), Duff & Phelps derived the following information with respect to premiums paid/offered:
                                           
     
    1 Day   5 Day   20 Day   30 Day   20-Day Avg.
     
Identified Transactions
                                       
 
Mean
    36.8%       34.6%       29.7%       23.8%       31.7%  
 
Median
    41.5%       41.7%       26.7%       23.7%       31.1%  
Proposed Transaction
    26.8%       31.6%       30.0%       29.7%       31.8%  
(assumes 1/17/06 as announcement date)
                                       

65


Table of Contents

      In addition to steel industry transactions, Duff & Phelps compared the premium implied by the merger price to overall average premiums in the domestic merger and acquisition market. The published data that Duff & Phelps used regarding overall acquisition premiums are based on a comparison of transaction prices with the market prices of the target companies five days prior to announcement. The table below summarizes the average market premiums for the overall merger and acquisition market in 2004 and 2005. As shown in the table above, the most comparable figure for EMJ — the premium versus market price five days prior to announcement — is 31.6%, which is in excess of the overall market average for each of the last two years.
                 
     
    2004   2005
     
Overall Average Premium — All Industries
    30.7 %     28.2 %
Number of Transactions
    322       325  
Conclusion
      In summary, Duff & Phelps made the following observations:
  •  The merger price is at the high end of the valuation range indicated by the discounted cash flow analysis for EMJ, and the valuation multiples implied by the merger price are generally in line with the valuation multiples exhibited by the comparable public companies and the comparable transactions.
 
  •  The merger price is above any price at which EMJ has traded since its initial public offering date, and the premium over recent trading prices is generally in line with premiums paid in the steel industry and the overall public company merger and acquisition market over the past two years.
 
  •  The current price of Reliance common stock is within the range of values indicated by the discounted cash flow analysis, and valuation multiples implied by Reliance’s current stock price are at the high end of the range as compared with the peer companies, but such premium is consistent with the premium market valuation of Reliance over the past ten years.
 
  •  The inclusion of the collar in the merger structure provides EMJ stockholders with significant protection against movements in Reliance’s stock price prior to closing.
 
  •  Although EMJ stockholders will receive cash and stock, except for the Kelso Funds, those stockholders unwilling to hold Reliance shares will be able to immediately liquidate their securities in the open market.
Other
      Duff & Phelps is a nationally recognized investment banking firm that is regularly engaged to render financial opinions in connection with mergers and acquisitions, tax matters, ESOP and ERISA matters, corporate planning and other purposes. Previously, Duff & Phelps has provided EMJ with: (1) financial advisory services with respect to EMJ’s litigation with the Department of Labor, (2) the appraisal of capital stock for administration of EMJ’s stock bonus plan (the predecessor to EMJ’s retirement savings plan), and (3) fairness opinions in connection with EMJ’s merger and financial restructuring consummated in April 2005.
      EMJ has paid Duff & Phelps a fixed fee of $600,000 in connection with the services provided by it under this engagement. No portion of Duff & Phelps’ fees was contingent upon completion of the merger or the conclusion reached by Duff & Phelps in its fairness opinion. EMJ has also agreed to reimburse Duff & Phelps for its expenses incurred in performing its services and to indemnify Duff & Phelps and its affiliates, their respective directors, officers, agents and employees and each person, if any, controlling Duff & Phelps or any of its affiliates against certain liabilities and expenses, including certain liabilities under federal securities laws, related to or arising out of Duff & Phelps’ engagement and any related transactions.

66


Table of Contents

Reliance’s Reasons for the Merger
      Reliance’s general business strategy includes the acquisition of assets or businesses that are a logical extension of its existing businesses in order to (1) increase cash flow and earnings, (2) expand its geographic and customer diversification and (3) expand its product diversification in the metals service center industry. As shown in “Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Information,” Reliance believes that on a pro forma basis, the acquisition of EMJ will be immediately accretive to Reliance’s earnings. The acquisition of EMJ will allow Reliance to expand its presence in the Midwest, New England and Canada. The acquisition of EMJ will also permit Reliance to increase the diversity of its products, in areas such as specialty bar and tubing and other specialty metal products that are not a principal part of Reliance’s present product line. This diversification of products should enable Reliance to further expand its customer base into new industries.
      In reaching its decision to approve the merger agreement, Reliance’s board of directors consulted with Reliance management and its financial and legal advisors, and considered a variety of factors, including the following:
  •  Other available acquisition opportunities in the metals service center business and Reliance’s business, operations, financial condition, earnings, prospects and acquisition strategy;
 
  •  The business, operations, financial condition, earnings and prospects of EMJ;
 
  •  The ability of EMJ’s operations to enhance Reliance’s geographic, customer and product diversification;
 
  •  Potential contingent liabilities associated with EMJ and its assets, including litigation, environmental and regulatory issues;
 
  •  EMJ’s well-qualified and stable management team with the capacity to effectively manage EMJ’s operations on a going-forward basis in a manner complementary to the operations of Reliance;
 
  •  EMJ’s size and complementary product mix, geographic diversity and profitability;
 
  •  Recognizing that there can be no assurance as to future financial results, the anticipated financial impact of the merger on Reliance’s financial performance, including the anticipated impact on Reliance’s earnings and cash flow per share;
 
  •  The capital structure of Reliance following the merger, including Reliance’s ability to finance the cash portion of the merger consideration under its existing revolving credit facility and to continue to reduce indebtedness at a satisfactory rate following the merger;
 
  •  The structure of the merger and the financial and other terms of the merger agreement;
 
  •  The expectation that the merger will qualify as a tax-deferred “reorganization” for purposes of Section 368(a) of the Code; and
 
  •  The opinion of UBS Securities LLC that, as of the date of and based on and subject to the matters described in the opinion, the merger consideration to be paid by Reliance pursuant to the merger agreement was fair from a financial point of view to Reliance.
      While a decision to complete the merger did not include an analysis by Reliance of potential synergies, Reliance believes that synergies may be realized through the integration of financial reporting, the removal of redundant public company costs, enhanced metals sourcing, and the sharing of best practices which have the potential to improve the financial results of EMJ and also provide benefits to Reliance.
      The foregoing discussion of the information and factors considered by Reliance’s board of directors is not exhaustive but does include the material factors considered by the Reliance board of directors. Reliance’s board of directors did not quantify or assign any relative or specific weights to the various

67


Table of Contents

factors that it considered. Rather, Reliance’s board of directors based its decision to approve the merger agreement on the totality of the information presented to and considered by it.
Management and Operations Following the Merger
      Consistent with Reliance’s historical acquisition strategy, EMJ will continue to operate relatively independently. Reliance management believes little operational integration will be necessary. With the exception of EMJ’s chief executive officer, Mr. Nelson, who will retire upon the closing of the merger but will continue as a consultant during a post-closing transition period, the existing management team of EMJ is expected to remain in place and continue to operate EMJ on a going-forward basis. Reliance has no current plans to close or downsize any of EMJ’s present facilities nor does Reliance anticipate any material changes in EMJ’s employment levels. The directors of EMJ after the merger will be the directors of RSAC prior to the merger, plus Mr. McCaffery and Mr. Johnson from EMJ. The executive officers of EMJ will include the executive officers of EMJ prior to the merger, other than Mr. Nelson, as well as certain officers of Reliance.
Interests of EMJ’s Directors and Executive Officers in the Merger
      In considering the recommendation of EMJ’s board of directors with respect to the merger agreement and the merger, EMJ’s stockholders should be aware that some of EMJ’s directors and executive officers have interests in the merger and have arrangements that are different from, or in addition to, those of EMJ’s stockholders generally. These interests and arrangements may create potential conflicts of interest. EMJ’s board of directors was aware of these potential conflicts of interest and considered them, among other matters, in reaching its decisions to approve the merger agreement and the merger and to recommend that EMJ’s stockholders vote in favor of adopting the merger agreement and approving the merger.
Nelson Retention Agreement
      On December 17, 2004, Mr. Nelson entered into a retention agreement with EMJ whereby EMJ agreed to pay Mr. Nelson a bonus of $3 million on March 31, 2007, if he continues to serve as EMJ’s President and chief executive officer through such date. Pursuant to the retention agreement, Mr. Nelson is also entitled to the bonus if his employment with EMJ is terminated by Mr. Nelson for good reason, which includes ongoing diminution in Mr. Nelson’s title, duties or responsibilities or a material reduction in his base salary or benefits. Mr. Nelson’s employment as chief executive officer will terminate for good reason (as defined in the retention agreement) upon completion of the merger and Mr. Nelson will become entitled to payment of the bonus of $3 million six months after completion of the merger and his termination.
Johnson Retention Agreement
      On January 17, 2006, Mr. Johnson, EMJ’s vice president, chief financial officer and secretary, entered into a retention agreement with EMJ that provides for employment and severance benefits and has a term of three years, unless terminated earlier pursuant to its terms. Mr. Johnson’s retention agreement provides generally that Mr. Johnson’s terms and conditions of employment (including position, responsibility, location, compensation, and benefits) will not be adversely changed during the term of the agreement and provides for certain minimum guaranteed compensation levels (including base salary, annual bonus, long-term incentives, and participation in benefit plans) during such term.
      On the six-month anniversary of the effective time of the merger, if Mr. Johnson remains employed by EMJ, Reliance or any affiliate of Reliance, Mr. Johnson will be entitled to a bonus of approximately $425,000. On the twelve-month anniversary of the effective time of the merger, if Mr. Johnson remains employed by EMJ, Reliance or any affiliate of Reliance, Mr. Johnson will be entitled to an additional bonus of $200,000. If EMJ terminates Mr. Johnson’s employment without cause or if Mr. Johnson terminates his employment for “good reason” (as defined in the retention agreement and summarized

68


Table of Contents

below) with an effective termination date prior to the six-month anniversary of the effective time of the merger, then Mr. Johnson will be eligible to receive the six-month bonus. If EMJ terminates Mr. Johnson’s employment without cause or if Mr. Johnson terminates his employment for good reason with an effective termination date on or after the six-month anniversary and prior to the twelve-month anniversary of the effective time of the merger, then Mr. Johnson will be eligible to receive a pro rata portion of the twelve-month bonus based on the number of days elapsed since the effective time of the merger. For purposes of Mr. Johnson’s retention agreement, “good reason” is defined generally to include a material reduction of his base salary or bonus and incentive compensation, material adverse changes to Mr. Johnson’s disability policies or life or disability insurance benefits, unless such changes affect all senior executives equally, and certain relocations.
Special Bonus Plan for Senior Management
      On January 17, 2006, EMJ’s board of directors approved a special bonus plan for senior management providing that, immediately prior to the closing of the merger, EMJ will pay a taxable bonus to certain members of EMJ senior management in connection with the completion of the merger in an aggregate amount not to exceed $5 million, which bonus will be allocated to such members of EMJ’s senior management as determined by EMJ’s board of directors.
      The table below sets forth the bonus awards expected to be granted to each executive officer of EMJ pursuant to the special bonus plan for senior management.
         
    Amount of
Name   Bonus Award
     
R. Neil McCaffery
  $ 312,500  
Frank D. Travetto
  $ 312,500  
Kenneth L. Henry
  $ 312,500  
James D. Hoffman
  $ 312,500  
William S. Johnson
  $ 625,000  
Kelso Funds
      As of the record date, the Kelso Funds and their affiliates, including two of EMJ’s directors, hold 25,205,133 shares of EMJ’s common stock, of which the Kelso Funds hold 25,174,634 shares representing 50.1% of the issued and outstanding shares of EMJ’s common stock. Upon completion of the merger, the Kelso Funds and their affiliates will receive aggregate merger consideration consisting of approximately $163.8 million in cash and 2,340,142 shares of Reliance common stock (assuming the average closing price of the Reliance common stock for the pricing period is equal to $70.01, which would be the average closing price for the pricing period if the pricing period ended on January 31, 2006).
      Of the 25,205,133 shares held by the Kelso Funds and their affiliates, (1) 22,445,810 shares are owned of record by KIA IV, (2) 11,616 shares are owned of record by KEP II, (3) 1,704,740 shares are owned of record by KIA III — EMJ, (4) 1,012,468 shares are owned of record by or KIA I. In addition, 5,000 shares are owned of record by George E. Matelich (a general partner of Kelso Partners IV, L.P., or KP IV, which is the general partner of KIA IV, and a general partner of KEP II), 5,000 shares are owned of record by Thomas R. Wall, IV (a general partner of KP IV and a general partner of KEP II) and 20,499 shares are owned of record by Frank T. Nickell. Mr. Nickell is a general partner of KP I, KP III and KP IV. Mr. Nickell is also President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Kelso & Companies, Inc., which is the general partner of Kelso & Company, L.P. Mr. Nickell is deemed to beneficially own 25,195,133 shares of EMJ common stock. Mr. Nickell owns 20,499 shares of record and will receive approximately $133,000 and 1,903 shares of Reliance common stock in the merger (assuming the average closing price of the Reliance common stock for the pricing period is equal to $70.01). Mr. Nickell disclaims beneficial ownership of the securities owned or deemed beneficially owned by each of the Kelso Funds pursuant to Rule 13d-4 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Mr. Nickell is a director of EMJ and shares investment and voting power with respect to shares of

69


Table of Contents

EMJ’s common stock held by the Kelso Funds. Mr. Wahrhaftig is a general partner of KP IV and a managing director and a member of the board of directors of Kelso & Companies, Inc., KP I, KP III and KP IV are the general partners of KIA I, KIA III-EMJ and KIA IV, respectively. Mr. Wahrhaftig is a director of EMJ and shares investment and voting power with respect to shares of EMJ’s common stock held by KIA IV. Mr. Wahrhaftig is deemed to beneficially own 22,457,426 shares of EMJ common stock. Mr. Wahrhaftig holds no shares of EMJ common stock of record and will not directly receive any merger consideration. Mr. Wahrhaftig disclaims beneficial ownership of the securities owned or deemed beneficially owned by each of the Kelso Funds pursuant to Rule 13d-4 under the Exchange Act.
      The Kelso Funds have entered into the voting agreement with Reliance pursuant to which they have agreed to vote the 25,174,634 shares of EMJ common stock held by them in favor of the adoption and approval of the merger agreement.
      Reliance also entered into the registration rights agreement with the Kelso Funds pursuant to which Reliance will prepare and file, within ten days after the closing of the merger, a registration statement under the Securities Act at Reliance’s expense, covering all or a portion of the Kelso Funds’ shares. Pursuant to the registration rights agreement, Reliance also will provide the Kelso Funds with certain demand and piggyback registration rights with respect to the shares of Reliance common stock received by the Kelso Funds in the merger.
Merger Consideration to be Received by EMJ’s Executive Officers and Directors
      EMJ’s executive officers participate in EMJ’s retirement savings plan and EMJ’s executive officers and some of EMJ’s directors participate in EMJ’s equity plans under which stock options have been granted. Upon completion of the merger, executive officers and certain directors of EMJ will receive the same merger consideration as the other EMJ stockholders for their EMJ common stock and will receive cash or options to purchase Reliance common stock for their EMJ stock options. See “The Merger Agreement — Merger Consideration” and “The Merger Agreement — Treatment of EMJ Stock Options and Other Equity-Based Awards.”

70


Table of Contents

      The table below sets forth for each executive officer and director of EMJ, other than those affiliated with the Kelso Funds, (1) the shares of EMJ common stock beneficially owned, (2) the options to purchase shares of EMJ common stock granted pursuant to the EMJ incentive plan, (3) the options to purchase shares of EMJ common stock granted pursuant to the Holding option plan, (4) the number of options to purchase Reliance common stock to be received upon conversion of options to purchase EMJ common stock under the EMJ incentive plan (assuming an average closing price of Reliance common stock for the pricing period of $70.01) and (5) the amount of cash to be received in exchange for the options outstanding under the Holding option plan at $13.00 per share less the actual exercise price.
                                         
    Shares of                
    EMJ   Options to Purchase   Options to Purchase        
    Common   EMJ Common   EMJ Common   Options to Purchase    
    Stock   Stock Pursuant to   Stock Pursuant to   Reliance Common    
    Beneficially   the EMJ Incentive   the Holding Option   Stock to be   Cash for Holding
Name   Owned   Plan   Plan   Received   Stock Options
 
David M. Roderick
    34,000       10,000       176,410 (1)     1,856     $ 1,707,331.26  
Maurice S. Nelson, Jr. 
    6,533.8682       50,000       1,693,538 (2)     9,284     $ 16,816,832.34  
Dr. John Rutledge
    5,000       10,000       70,564 (3)     1,856     $ 678,432.29  
William A. Marquard
    10,000       10,000       70,564 (3)     1,856     $ 678,432.29  
Earl L. Mason
          10,000             1,856        
Joseph T. O’Donnell, Jr. 
          10,000             1,856        
Andrew G. Sharkey, III
          10,000             1,856        
R. Neil McCaffery
    32,028.1751       30,000       167,591 (4)     5,570     $ 1,577,778.58  
Frank D. Travetto
    33,502.8509       30,000       167,591 (4)     5,570     $ 1,577,778.58  
Kenneth L. Henry
    131,545.2923       30,000       167,591 (4)     5,570     $ 1,577,778.58  
James D. Hoffman
    17,074.5286       30,000       167,591 (4)     5,570     $ 1,577,778.58  
William S. Johnson
    9,665.0748       30,000       123,488 (5)     5,570     $ 1,125,438.13  
Indemnification; Directors’ and Officers’ Insurance
      RSAC has agreed to indemnify, defend and hold harmless, and provide advancement of expenses to, all past and present directors, officers and employees of EMJ and its subsidiaries for acts or omissions occurring prior to the merger to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. In addition, for a period of six years after the merger, Reliance has agreed, and has agreed to cause RSAC, to maintain and preserve, RSAC’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws to contain provisions regarding exculpation, indemnification and advancement of expenses for officers, directors and employees of EMJ that overall are no less generous than those included in the current EMJ certificate of incorporation and bylaws and to honor all of EMJ’s obligations to indemnify all officers, directors and employees of EMJ for acts and omissions by such persons prior to the completion of the merger to the extent such obligations existed on January 17, 2006. These obligations survive the effectiveness of the merger and shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with the terms of the relevant document until the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations. For a period of six years after the merger, Reliance has agreed to maintain the current policies of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance and fiduciary liability insurance maintained by EMJ with respect to claims arising from or related to facts or events that occurred prior to the merger and with a total insured coverage of $50 million of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance and $5 million of fiduciary liability insurance; provided that if the annual insurance premium payments for both insured coverages exceed a specified amount, Reliance will obtain a policy with the most advantageous terms available for that premium payment amount.
Transaction-Related Costs and Financing Arrangements
      Upon completion of the merger, Reliance will pay cash consideration of approximately $356 million to EMJ stockholders and option holders, issue between approximately 4.5 million and 6.1 million shares of its

71


Table of Contents

common stock and assume approximately $299 million of EMJ’s debt (based on EMJ’s outstanding indebtedness as of September 28, 2005).
      Reliance and EMJ expect to incur transaction-related costs aggregating approximately $18.7 million (including financial advisory, legal, accounting, consulting and public relations fees, registration and regulatory filing fees and printing and mailing costs associated with this proxy statement/ prospectus). In addition, Reliance will incur a maximum of $10.5 million for the payment of retention bonuses, management bonuses, severance payments and other change of control benefits pursuant to existing EMJ contracts in connection with the merger.
      Reliance intends to finance the cash portion of the consideration to be paid to EMJ stockholders and option holders in the merger, as well as other expenses of the transaction, through a combination of cash on hand, if any, and by drawing on its existing credit facility. Reliance has obtained all necessary consents or waivers required by its lenders to complete the merger. Availability of financing is not a condition precedent to Reliance’s obligation to effect the merger.
EMJ’s Financing Arrangements
      EMJ has outstanding $250 million of 93/4% notes. As a result of the merger, the holders of the 93/4% notes have the option to require their redemption at 101% of face value. Pursuant to the terms of the 93/4% notes, Reliance will offer to buy the 93/4% notes, although it does not expect many of the holders of the 93/4% notes to accept the offer due to the interest rate they are receiving, a current trading value of approximately 109%, and the strength of Reliance’s financial condition. Reliance plans to pay the balance of EMJ’s current $300 million credit facility, which will release the liens held by EMJ’s lenders under that facility. Reliance will then provide EMJ with a revolving credit arrangement whereby EMJ can borrow as needed from Reliance and repay Reliance with interest at market interest rates.
Regulatory Matters
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act
      The merger is subject to the requirements of the HSR Act. The HSR Act requires that each party participating in an acquisition transaction meeting certain size thresholds notify and provide certain information and materials to the Federal Trade Commission and the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice and certain waiting periods must be terminated or must expire before the subject transaction can be completed. EMJ and Reliance filed their respective notification and report forms on January 20, 2006. Accordingly, unless the waiting period is earlier terminated or extended by a request for additional information, the waiting period will expire on February 21, 2006.
      At any time before or after completion of the merger, the Federal Trade Commission or the Department of Justice may, however, challenge the merger on antitrust grounds. Private parties also could take action under the antitrust laws, including seeking an injunction prohibiting or delaying the merger, divestiture or damages under certain circumstances. Additionally, at any time before or after the completion of the merger, notwithstanding expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period, any state could take action under the antitrust laws as it deems necessary or desirable in the public interest. There can be no assurance that a challenge to the merger will not be made or that, if a challenge is made, EMJ and Reliance will prevail.
Bermuda Monetary Authority
      The corporate and insurance laws of Bermuda govern the business and operations of Stainless Insurance Ltd., a captive insurance subsidiary of EMJ, whose entire issued and outstanding share capital will be held by RSAC as a result of the merger. The treatment of Stainless Insurance Ltd.’s share capital in the merger cannot be accomplished without (1) the consent of the Bermuda Monetary Authority (Authorization and Compliance Division) pursuant to the Exchange Control Act 1972 and (2) the “no

72


Table of Contents

objections” approval from the Bermuda Monetary Authority (Insurance Division) under the Insurance Act 1978.
      In order to obtain the consent of the Bermuda Monetary Authority (Authorization and Compliance Division), Reliance will be required to submit an application that will include certain information about Reliance including its financial statements, beneficial ownership information and information relating to its expertise in the area of insurance.
      In order to obtain the “no objections” approval from the Bermuda Monetary Authority (Insurance Division), Reliance may be required to submit a business plan, including a description of the proposed insurance business of Stainless Insurance Ltd. and five year financial projections, for the period commencing on the closing of the merger. Prior to giving its “no objections” approval, the Bermuda Monetary Authority (Insurance Division) may also, in its discretion, submit the proposed application to the Bermuda Insurance Admissions Committee which is comprised of individuals from the Bermuda insurance industry who meet each week to review and provide recommendations to the Bermuda Monetary Authority (Insurance Division) concerning insurance company applications. The final determination concerning the “no objections” approval rests with the Bermuda Monetary Authority (Insurance Division).
Canadian Regulatory Filings
      The Investment Canada Act governs the acquisition of EMJ’s Canadian subsidiary by Reliance. Pursuant to the Investment Canada Act, Reliance will make a notice filing with the Canadian Director of Investments following the completion of the merger.
      We are not aware of any other federal or state regulatory requirements that must be complied with or approvals that must be obtained to consummate the merger. We also may be required to make filings and obtain regulatory approvals from various other governmental authorities. Where necessary, the parties intend to make such filings. See “The Merger Agreement — Additional Covenants — Reasonable Best Efforts” and “The Merger Agreement — Conditions to Closing.”
Accounting Treatment
      Reliance intends to account for the merger under the purchase method of accounting for business combinations under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Under the purchase method of accounting, the total estimated purchase price is allocated to the net identifiable tangible and intangible assets of an acquired entity based on their estimated fair values as of the completion of the merger, with any excess being treated as goodwill. A final determination of these fair values will include management’s consideration of a valuation prepared by an independent valuation specialist. This valuation will be based on the actual net tangible and intangible assets of the acquired entity that exist as of the closing date of the transaction. Reliance will include EMJ’s results of operations in Reliance’s consolidated financial statements from the date of completion of the merger.
Restrictions on Sale of Shares by Affiliates of EMJ and Reliance
      The shares of Reliance common stock to be received by EMJ’s stockholders in connection with the merger will be registered under the Securities Act and will be freely transferable, except for shares of Reliance common stock issued to any person who is deemed to be an affiliate of EMJ or Reliance at the effective time of the merger. Persons who may be deemed to be affiliates include individuals or entities that control, are controlled by, or are under common control with EMJ and may include the executive officers, directors and significant stockholders of EMJ or Reliance. Affiliates may not sell their shares of Reliance common stock acquired in connection with the merger except pursuant to:
  •  an effective registration statement under the Securities Act covering the resale of those shares;
 
  •  Rule 145 (or for EMJ stockholders who become affiliates of Reliance, Rule 144) under the Securities Act; or

73


Table of Contents

  •  any other applicable exemption under the Securities Act.
      The merger agreement requires EMJ to use its reasonable best efforts to cause each of its affiliates to execute a written agreement to the effect that such person will not offer to sell or otherwise dispose of any of the shares of Reliance common stock issued to such person in or pursuant to the merger except in compliance with the Securities Act and the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC thereunder. Reliance’s registration statement on Form S-4, of which this proxy statement/ prospectus forms a part, may not be used in connection with the resale of shares of Reliance common stock received in the merger by affiliates.
      Reliance has entered into the registration rights agreement with the Kelso Funds pursuant to which Reliance will prepare and file, within ten days after the closing of the merger, a registration statement under the Securities Act at Reliance’s expense, covering all or a portion of the Kelso Fund’s shares. Pursuant to the registration rights agreement, Reliance also will provide the Kelso Funds with certain demand and piggyback registration rights with respect to the shares of Reliance common stock received by the Kelso Funds in the merger.
Stock Market Listing
      An application was filed with the New York Stock Exchange on                     , 2006 for listing: (1) the shares of Reliance common stock to be issued in the merger, (2) the shares of Reliance common stock issuable upon exercise of the options to purchase Reliance common stock upon the conversion of options to purchase shares of EMJ common stock in connection with the merger and (3) the shares of Reliance common stock to be issued to the retirement savings plan pursuant to EMJ’s obligation under such plan. If the merger is completed, EMJ common stock will be delisted from the New York Stock Exchange and will be deregistered under the Exchange Act.

74


Table of Contents

THE MERGER AGREEMENT
      The following describes certain aspects of the merger, including material provisions of the merger agreement. The following description of the merger agreement is subject to, and qualified in its entirety by reference to, the merger agreement, which is attached to this document as Annex A and is incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus. We urge you to read the merger agreement carefully and in its entirety, as it is the legal document governing the merger.
Structure of the Merger
      In accordance with the merger agreement and Delaware law, EMJ will merge with and into RSAC, a direct and wholly-owned subsidiary of Reliance. As a result of the merger, the separate corporate existence of EMJ will cease, and RSAC will survive as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Reliance. As part of the merger, RSAC will change its name to Earle M. Jorgensen Company.
Merger Consideration
      If we complete the merger, EMJ stockholders will be entitled to receive for each outstanding share of EMJ common stock $6.50 in cash and a to-be-determined fraction of a share of Reliance common stock. The value of the Reliance common stock component will be approximately $6.50, but is subject to adjustment. The value of Reliance common stock to be issued in exchange for each share of EMJ common stock will be determined based upon the average Reliance stock price. If the average closing price of Reliance common stock for the pricing period is:
  •  more than $72.86, you will receive Reliance common stock with a value that may be more than $6.50 for each share of EMJ common stock;
 
  •  equal to or less than $72.86 but equal to or more than $53.86, you will receive Reliance common stock with a value of $6.50 for each share of EMJ common stock; and
 
  •  less than $53.86, you will receive Reliance common stock with a value that may be less than $6.50 for each share of EMJ common stock.
      The number of shares of Reliance common stock you will receive in the merger will equal the number, rounded down to the nearest whole number, determined by multiplying the exchange ratio by the number of shares of EMJ common stock you own.
      You will not receive any fractional shares of Reliance common stock in the merger. Instead, you will be entitled to receive cash, without interest, for any fractional share of Reliance common stock you might otherwise have been entitled to receive, based on the average closing price of Reliance common stock for the pricing period.
      The exchange ratio will not be determined until after the date of the special meeting. Therefore, at the time of the special meeting, you will not know the precise value of the merger consideration you will receive on the date the merger is completed.
      We will adjust the value or number of shares of Reliance common stock that you receive for each of your shares of EMJ common stock based upon the average closing price of Reliance common stock for the pricing period. If the average Reliance price stock is:
  •  more than $72.86, then you will receive 0.0892 shares of Reliance common stock for each share of EMJ common stock that you own;
 
  •  equal to or less than $72.86 but equal to or more than $53.86, then you will receive a fraction of a share of Reliance common stock equal to $6.50 divided by the average Reliance stock price; and
 
  •  less than $53.86, then you will receive 0.1207 shares of Reliance common stock for each share of EMJ common stock you own.

75


Table of Contents

      The following table provides some examples of how the formula above works to determine the exchange ratio and the corresponding value of the Reliance common stock that you will receive for a share of EMJ common stock at various average Reliance stock prices.
                                 
                Total Value of Cash
        Value of Reliance       and Reliance
        Common Stock per   Cash per Share of   Common Stock per
        Share of EMJ Common   EMJ Common   Share of EMJ
Average Reliance Stock Price   Exchange Ratio   Stock   Stock   Common Stock
                 
$40
    0.1207     $ 4.83     $ 6.50     $ 11.33  
$45
    0.1207     $ 5.43     $ 6.50     $ 11.93  
$50
    0.1207     $ 6.03     $ 6.50     $ 12.53  
$53.86 - $72.86
    0.1207 - 0.0892     $ 6.50     $ 6.50     $ 13.00  
$75
    0.0892     $ 6.69     $ 6.50     $ 13.19  
$80
    0.0892     $ 7.14     $ 6.50     $ 13.64  
$85
    0.0892     $ 7.58     $ 6.50     $ 14.08  
      We expect the market price of Reliance common stock to fluctuate prior to the merger. Therefore, because the value and number of shares of Reliance common stock you receive in the merger is determined based upon the average closing price of Reliance common stock for the pricing period, you should obtain current stock price quotations for Reliance common stock prior to voting on the merger. You should also note that, because the exchange ratio is fixed two trading days before the closing of the merger and we expect the market price of Reliance common stock to fluctuate, the value of the Reliance common stock that you will receive in the merger may increase or decrease during the two-day trading period between the end of the pricing period and the closing of the merger.
      Based upon 50,237,094 shares of EMJ common stock outstanding as of January 31, 2006, and an assumed exchange ratio of 0.0928, which is based on the average closing market price of Reliance common stock during the 20 consecutive trading days ended January 31, 2006, Reliance will issue an aggregate of approximately 4,662,002 shares of Reliance common stock in the merger to the holders of these shares of EMJ common stock. Based upon the 33,133,199 shares of Reliance common stock outstanding as of January 31, 2006, the holders of these shares of EMJ common stock collectively will hold approximately 12.3% of the shares of Reliance common stock outstanding immediately after the merger.
Treatment of EMJ Stock Options and Other Equity-Based Awards
Holding Stock Options
      Each outstanding option to acquire EMJ common stock granted under the Holding option plan will be converted automatically at the effective time of the merger into the right to receive an amount in cash, if any, equal to (1) the difference between (a) $13.00 and (b) the applicable per share exercise price, multiplied by (2) the number of shares of EMJ common stock subject to such stock option, subject to any applicable withholding of taxes.
EMJ Stock Options
      Each outstanding option to acquire EMJ common stock granted under the EMJ incentive plan will be converted automatically at the effective time of the merger into an option to purchase Reliance common stock and will continue to be governed by the terms of the EMJ incentive plan and related grant agreements under which it was granted, except that:
  •  the number of shares of Reliance common stock subject to the new Reliance stock option will be equal to the product of the number of shares of EMJ common stock subject to the EMJ stock option and the option exchange ratio, rounded down to the nearest whole share; and

76


Table of Contents

  •  the exercise price per share of Reliance common stock subject to the new Reliance stock option will be equal to the exercise price per share of EMJ common stock under the EMJ stock option divided by the option exchange ratio, rounded up to the nearest cent.
      The option exchange ratio will be the product of the exchange ratio used to determine the fraction of a share of Reliance common stock to be issued for each share of EMJ common stock in the merger multiplied by two, to account for the fact that cash consideration will not be paid.
      Reliance has agreed to reserve additional shares of Reliance common stock to satisfy its obligations under the EMJ retirement savings plan and pursuant to the converted stock options and other equity-based awards and to file a registration statement with the SEC on an appropriate form to the extent necessary to register Reliance common stock subject to the converted stock options and other equity-based awards.
Closing and Effective Time of the Merger
      The merger will be effective at the time and date stated in the certificate of merger that will be filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, the state of incorporation of RSAC and EMJ. Under the merger agreement, the filing of the certificate of merger and the closing of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement will occur on the second business day following the satisfaction or waiver of all conditions to the merger, unless otherwise agreed to by the parties.
Surrender of EMJ Stock Certificates
      Following the effective time of the merger, Computershare Investor Services, the exchange/paying agent, will mail to each record holder of EMJ common stock a transmittal letter that will detail the procedures for record holders to exchange EMJ common stock certificates for Reliance certificates and the cash portion of the merger consideration, plus cash in lieu of any fractional shares and any dividends to which you might be entitled at that time. After the effective time of the merger, transfers of EMJ common stock will not be registered on EMJ stock transfer books.
Dividends
      As a holder of EMJ common stock, you will be entitled to receive dividends or other distributions on Reliance common stock with a record date after the merger is completed, but only after you have surrendered your EMJ stock certificates.
      If there is any dividend or other distribution on Reliance common stock with a record date after the merger, you will receive the dividend or distribution promptly after the later of the date that your Reliance shares are issued to you in exchange for your EMJ certificates and the date the dividend or other distribution is paid to all Reliance shareholders.
Representations and Warranties
      Pursuant to the merger agreement, EMJ and Reliance make certain representations and warranties to each other about their respective companies and businesses related to, among other things:
  •  corporate existence, qualification to conduct business and corporate power of both themselves and their respective subsidiaries;
 
  •  capitalization and ownership of subsidiaries;
 
  •  corporate authority to enter into, and carry out the obligations of, the merger agreement, and the enforceability of the merger agreement;
 
  •  absence of conflicts between the merger agreement and their respective charter documents and bylaws, applicable law or certain agreements;
 
  •  governmental consents and approvals required for completion of the merger;

77


Table of Contents

  •  financial statements and filings with the SEC, as well as internal controls over financial reporting;
 
  •  absence of undisclosed liabilities and off-balance sheet arrangements, as well as loans to officers and directors;
 
  •  absence of specified changes or events through the closing of the merger;
 
  •  legal proceedings;
 
  •  compliance with applicable laws;
 
  •  environmental liabilities;
 
  •  insurance policies;
 
  •  properties and assets;
 
  •  employee benefit plans and labor matters;
 
  •  payment of fees to finders or brokers in connection with the merger;
 
  •  tax matters;
 
  •  qualification of the merger as a “reorganization” under the Code;
 
  •  information supplied for use in this proxy statement/ prospectus;
 
  •  intellectual property; and
 
  •  approval of its respective board of directors.
      EMJ also made representations and warranties to Reliance related to:
  •  the inapplicability to the merger of state anti-takeover laws;
 
  •  the receipt of an opinion from each of EMJ’s financial advisors; and
 
  •  material contracts.
      Reliance also represented and warranted to EMJ that, at the time of mailing this proxy statement/ prospectus, and at the effective time of the merger, Reliance would have sufficient funds to enable it to complete the merger.
      The representations and warranties contained in the merger agreement are subject to materiality and knowledge qualifications in many respects, and do not survive the effective time of the merger.
      This description of the representations and warranties is included to provide stockholders with information regarding the terms of the merger agreement. It is not intended to provide any other factual information about Reliance or EMJ. The assertions embodied in the representations and warranties are qualified by information in confidential disclosure letters that the parties exchanged in connection with signing the merger agreement. The disclosure letters contain information that modifies, qualifies and creates exceptions to the representations and warranties. Accordingly, you should not rely on the representations and warranties as characterizations of the actual state of facts at the time they were made or otherwise.
Operations Before Completion of the Merger
Restrictions on EMJ’s and Reliance’s Operations Before Completion of the Merger
      In the merger agreement, EMJ and Reliance have agreed to several restrictions on their activities until either the completion of the merger or the termination of the merger agreement. In general, they are

78


Table of Contents

required to conduct their respective businesses in the ordinary course consistent with past practices, in substantially the same manner as previously conducted, and to use their reasonable best efforts to:
  •  keep available the services of their current officers and other key employees;
 
  •  preserve intact their present lines of business and maintain their rights and franchises; and
 
  •  preserve their relationships with customers, suppliers and others having business dealings with them.
Additional Restrictions on EMJ’s Operations Before Completion of the Merger
      In addition, EMJ has generally agreed to restrictions that prohibit it, or any of its subsidiaries, from:
  •  incurring or committing to any capital expenditures, capital additions or capital improvements, other than those in the ordinary course of business or as contemplated by EMJ’s fiscal 2006 and 2007 capital budgets and in any event not in excess of $5 million in the aggregate, except as provided for in such budgets;
 
  •  declaring, setting aside or paying dividends other than intracompany dividends;
 
  •  splitting, combining or reclassifying its capital stock;
 
  •  repurchasing, redeeming or otherwise acquiring its capital stock or securities convertible into or exercisable for any shares of its capital stock;
 
  •  issuing, delivering or selling any shares of its capital stock, voting debt or convertible securities (or corporate actions related thereto), other than in connection with the exercise of EMJ stock options or other stock-based awards;
 
  •  amending EMJ’s charter documents;
 
  •  making any material acquisitions, other than acquisitions of assets used in the operations of EMJ in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;
 
  •  selling, transferring, divesting or disposing of assets (including the capital stock of its subsidiaries), businesses or divisions, other than transactions that do not have a fair value, individually, in excess of $3 million or, in the aggregate, in excess of $10 million in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;
 
  •  incurring liens other than pursuant to specified debt agreements or incurred in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;
 
  •  paying or committing to pay any material severance or termination pay not existing as of January 17, 2006; entering into any material employment, deferred compensation, consulting, severance or similar agreement not existing as of January 17, 2006; or increasing in any material respect any employee benefits payable to any director, officer or key employee except pursuant to an agreement existing as of January 17, 2006;
 
  •  adopting any additional employee benefit plan or making any material amendment to an employee benefit plan;
 
  •  making any material contribution to any employee benefit plan other than regularly scheduled contributions or those required by law or agreement;
 
  •  entering into any agreement that limits or restricts the right of EMJ or any of its subsidiaries to engage or compete in any business or in any geographic area or location;
 
  •  changing in any material respect its accounting methods, except as may be required by a governmental authority or by changes in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles;
 
  •  changing its fiscal year, preparing or filing any material tax return materially inconsistent with past practice or, on such tax return, taking any position or making any tax election or adopting any

79


Table of Contents

  method that is materially inconsistent with positions taken, elections made or methods used in preparing or filing similar tax returns, or settling or compromising any liability for taxes; and
 
  •  agreeing, authorizing or entering into any commitment to do any of the foregoing.
Additional Restrictions on Reliance’s Operations Before Completion of the Merger
      Reliance has agreed to restrictions that prohibit it from:
  •  repurchasing, redeeming or otherwise acquiring its capital stock or securities convertible into or exercisable for any shares of its capital stock;
 
  •  issuing, delivering or selling any shares of its capital stock, voting debt or convertible securities (or corporate actions related thereto), other than in connection with the exercise or grant of Reliance stock options or other stock-based awards or intracompany issuances of capital stock;
 
  •  amending Reliance’s charter documents;
 
  •  altering the corporate structure of Reliance or any of its subsidiaries where such change is reasonably likely to result in a material adverse effect to Reliance or would adversely affect the value of Reliance’s common stock; or
 
  •  agreeing, authorizing or entering into any commitment to do any of the foregoing.
No Solicitation
      EMJ agreed in the merger agreement that it will neither, nor will it authorize or permit any of its subsidiaries, officers, directors, employees, agents, representatives or affiliates to, directly or indirectly:
  •  initiate, negotiate, solicit or knowingly encourage or facilitate (including by way of furnishing non-public information) any proposals with respect to a takeover proposal;
 
  •  enter into any agreement with respect to any takeover proposal; or
 
  •  furnish, or provide access to, any information or data to, or have or participate in any discussions or negotiations with, any person relating to a takeover proposal.
      A “takeover proposal” means any proposal or offer relating to or a transaction to effect:
  •  a transaction pursuant to which any person or group (other than Reliance and its subsidiaries) directly or indirectly, acquires or would acquire more than 19% of (1) the outstanding shares of EMJ common stock, (2) the voting power of the outstanding securities of EMJ or (3) any new series or new class of preferred stock of EMJ that would be entitled to a class or series vote with respect to the merger, whether from EMJ or pursuant to a tender offer or exchange offer or otherwise;
 
  •  a merger, share exchange, consolidation or other business combination involving EMJ (other than the merger);
 
  •  any transaction pursuant to which any person or group of persons (other than Reliance and its subsidiaries) acquires or would acquire control of assets (including for this purpose the outstanding equity securities of EMJ and securities of the entity surviving any merger or business combination including any of EMJ’s subsidiaries) of EMJ or any of EMJ’s subsidiaries representing more than 25% of the fair market value of all of the assets, net revenues or net income of EMJ and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, immediately prior to such transaction; and
 
  •  any other consolidation, business combination, recapitalization or similar transaction involving EMJ or any of its subsidiaries, as a result of which (a) the holders of shares of EMJ immediately prior to such transactions do not, in the aggregate, own at least 81% of the outstanding shares of common stock and the outstanding voting power of the surviving or resulting entity in such transaction immediately after the consummation of such transaction in substantially the same

80


Table of Contents

  proportion as such holders held the shares of EMJ common stock immediately prior to the consummation of such transaction or (b) the individuals comprising EMJ’s board of directors prior to such transaction do not constitute a majority of the board of the entity surviving or resulting from such transaction or such ultimate parent entity following the consummation of such transaction.
      A “superior proposal” is any bona fide, unsolicited takeover proposal made by a third party that is not subject to a financing condition, other than one similar to the financing condition in the merger agreement, and is on terms that EMJ’s board of directors determines in good faith, after consultation with EMJ’s outside legal counsel and financial advisors, to be more favorable to EMJ’s stockholders, from a financial point of view, than the merger described in this proxy statement/ prospectus. Furthermore, a superior proposal varies from a takeover proposal in that it means any proposal or offer relating to or a transaction to effect:
  •  a transaction pursuant to which any person or group (other than Reliance and its subsidiaries) directly or indirectly, acquires or would acquire more than 50% of (1) the outstanding shares of EMJ common stock, (2) the voting power of the outstanding securities of EMJ or (3) any new series or new class of preferred stock of EMJ that would be entitled to a class or series vote with respect to the merger, whether from EMJ or pursuant to a tender offer or exchange offer or otherwise;
 
  •  any transaction pursuant to which any person or group of persons (other than Reliance and its subsidiaries) acquires or would acquire control of assets (including for this purpose the outstanding equity securities of EMJ and securities of the entity surviving any merger or business combination including any of EMJ’s subsidiaries) of EMJ or any of EMJ’s subsidiaries representing more than 50% of the fair market value of all of the assets, net revenues or net income of EMJ and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, immediately prior to such transaction; or
 
  •  any other consolidation, business combination, recapitalization or similar transaction involving EMJ or any of its subsidiaries, as a result of which (1) the holders of shares of EMJ common stock immediately prior to such transactions do not, in the aggregate, own at least 50% of the outstanding shares of common stock and the outstanding voting power of the surviving or resulting entity in such transaction immediately after the consummation of such transaction in substantially the same proportion as such holders held the shares of EMJ common stock immediately prior to the consummation of such transaction or (2) the individuals comprising EMJ’s board of directors prior to such transaction do not constitute a majority of the board of the entity surviving or resulting from such transaction or such ultimate parent entity following the consummation of such transaction.
      Prior to the special meeting, EMJ may, in response to an unsolicited bona fide written takeover proposal by a third party and after giving prompt written notice to Reliance, furnish information to, pursuant to a confidentiality agreement no less restrictive than the one with Reliance, and participate in discussions or negotiations with, such third party regarding a takeover proposal if EMJ’s board of directors determines in good faith, after receiving advice of its outside legal counsel and financial advisor, that the takeover proposal constitutes or is reasonably likely to constitute a superior proposal.
      EMJ’s board of directors may not withdraw (or modify in a manner adverse to Reliance) its approval or recommendation of the merger agreement or the merger or approve, adopt or recommend any takeover proposal or enter into an agreement constituting or related to a takeover proposal, unless (1) following the receipt of an unsolicited takeover proposal EMJ’s board of directors determines in good faith after receiving the advice of a financial advisor and its outside counsel that such takeover proposal is a superior proposal, or EMJ’s board of directors determines in good faith after receiving the advice of its outside counsel and financial advisors that there is a reasonable probability that failure to take such action would result in the board breaching its fiduciary duties; (2) EMJ provides four business days’ prior written notice to Reliance of such action; and (3) after such notice, EMJ’s board of directors determines that the takeover proposal still constitutes a superior proposal. EMJ has agreed to provide Reliance with prompt

81


Table of Contents

notice of any inquiry EMJ reasonably believes could lead to a takeover proposal and the terms of such inquiry and the identity of the person making such inquiry and to keep Reliance fully informed of the status and details of any such inquiry.
      Additionally, EMJ’s board of directors is not prohibited from taking and disclosing to EMJ’s stockholders a position contemplated by Rules 14d-9 or 14e-2(a) or Item 1012(a) of Regulation M-A promulgated under the Exchange Act in response to an unsolicited superior proposal.
      For purposes of the foregoing, any violation of the restrictions described in this portion of the merger agreement summary by any director, officer or employee of EMJ or any of its subsidiaries, or any investment banker, financial advisor, attorney, accountant or other advisor, agent or representative of EMJ is deemed to be a breach of the relevant restriction by EMJ.
Termination of the Merger Agreement
Termination by Reliance or EMJ
      Either of our respective boards of directors may terminate the merger agreement and abandon the merger at any time prior to completion of the merger, whether or not it has been approved by the EMJ stockholders, if:
  •  Reliance and EMJ agree to terminate by mutual written consent;
 
  •  the merger has not been completed on or before June 2, 2006, except that a party may not terminate the merger agreement if that party’s willful and material breach of the merger agreement is the primary cause of the merger not being completed by that date;
 
  •  a court or another governmental authority has issued a final and nonappealable order, decree or ruling or taken other action permanently restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the merger;
 
  •  a governmental authority has failed to grant or issue a consent, permit, order or authorization required to consummate the merger;
 
  •  EMJ’s board of directors determines to accept a superior proposal; or
 
  •  EMJ stockholders fail to adopt the merger agreement at the special meeting.
Termination by Reliance
      In addition, Reliance’s board of directors may terminate the merger agreement and abandon the merger at any time prior to completion of the merger if:
  •  EMJ’s board of directors withdraws or adversely modifies its recommendation;
 
  •  EMJ breaches its representations, warranties or covenants contained in the merger agreement so that any conditions to closing are not capable of being satisfied and cannot or have not been cured within 30 days after written notice to Reliance of such breach; or
 
  •  EMJ’s board of directors recommends to EMJ stockholders that they approve a takeover proposal other than the merger.
Termination by EMJ
      EMJ’s board of directors may terminate the merger agreement and abandon the merger at any time prior to completion of the merger if Reliance breaches its representations, warranties or covenants contained in the merger agreement so that the conditions to closing are not capable of being satisfied and cannot or have not been cured within 30 days after written notice to EMJ of such breach.

82


Table of Contents

Termination Fee To Be Paid by EMJ
      EMJ has agreed to pay Reliance a termination fee of approximately $20.5 million if Reliance terminates the merger agreement as the result of:
  •  EMJ’s board of directors withdrawing or adversely modifying its recommendation to EMJ stockholders to adopt the merger agreement and the merger or recommending a takeover proposal other than the merger; or
 
  •  EMJ’s board of directors accepting a superior proposal.
Additional Covenants
      In addition to the covenants relating to the conduct of the parties’ businesses before completion of the merger, each of Reliance and EMJ has agreed to perform additional specified covenants. The principal additional covenants are as follows:
Special Meeting
      EMJ has agreed to hold a special meeting of its stockholders to consider and vote upon adoption of the merger agreement and to use its reasonable best efforts to obtain the approval of EMJ stockholders.
HSR Act Filing
      Each of Reliance and EMJ has agreed to cooperate fully with each other in connection with the making of all filings and responses as may be required under the HSR Act.
Access to Information
      Upon reasonable notice, each of Reliance and EMJ has agreed to, and has agreed to cause each of its respective significant subsidiaries to, afford to the other party and to the officers, employees, accountants, legal counsel, financial advisors and other representatives of the other party, reasonable access during normal business hours during the period prior to the completion of the merger to all of their respective properties, books, contracts, commitments, personnel and records, and each of Reliance and EMJ has the right to access the properties, books, contracts, commitments, personnel and records of any non-significant subsidiary of the other party to the extent that the operations or business of any such subsidiary would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect upon such other party.
Reasonable Best Efforts
      Each of Reliance and EMJ has agreed to use its commercially reasonable efforts to take all actions and do all things necessary or advisable under the merger agreement or applicable law to complete the merger. This cooperation may include contesting and resisting any action or proceeding challenging the merger.
Employee Matters
      RSAC has agreed to assume all obligations of EMJ with respect to its retirement savings plan and Reliance has agreed to guarantee RSAC’s performance under such plan to make an additional employer contribution to this plan in a number of shares of Reliance common stock at least equal to the number of shares of EMJ common stock that would have been contributed for this year if the merger had not occurred multiplied by the exchange ratio multiplied by two. Prior to the completion of the merger, Reliance has agreed to reserve for issuance the number of shares of Reliance common stock necessary to satisfy Reliance’s obligations with respect to EMJ’s retirement savings plan. Reliance also has agreed to file, promptly after the completion of the merger, a registration statement with the SEC on an appropriate form to the extent necessary to register Reliance common stock to be issued or issuable pursuant to the EMJ retirement savings plan as long as this plan has an investment option to allow for Reliance common

83


Table of Contents

stock, which option must be continued for no less than one year from the date of the completion of the merger.
      RSAC has also agreed, and Reliance has agreed to cause RSAC to, maintain EMJ’s existing employee benefit plans for no less than one year from the date of the closing of the merger, or to provide benefits that are at least as favorable to EMJ employees as in effect on the date of the merger agreement, subject to any applicable collective bargaining agreements.
      Reliance has also agreed, and has agreed to cause RSAC, to (1) subject to the limitations proscribed by Section 280G of the Code, honor all of EMJ’s existing employment, change of control, severance and termination agreements, plans and policies in effect as of the date the merger agreement was executed and (2) amend any of these plans or arrangements, if necessary, so as to avoid liability under Section 409A of the Code.
      Reliance has agreed, and has agreed to cause RSAC, for one year after the completion of the merger, to provide annual rates of base salary or hourly wages, as applicable, and annual incentive opportunities to EMJ employees who do not have an employment, change of control, severance or termination agreement with EMJ, where such benefits are at least as favorable in the aggregate to these EMJ employees as in effect on the date of the merger agreement.
      For all purposes of determining eligibility to participate and vesting and for purposes of benefit accrual, Reliance has also agreed to credit each EMJ employee for his or her years of service with EMJ and its subsidiaries before the completion of the merger to the same extent such EMJ employee was entitled, before the merger, to credit for that service under any similar EMJ benefit plan, except to the extent that such credit would result in a duplication of benefits or for credit for benefit accrual purposes under any defined benefit plan.
Insurance and Indemnification
      Reliance has agreed to indemnify, defend and hold harmless, and provide advancement of expenses to, all past and present directors, officers and employees of EMJ and its subsidiaries for acts or omissions occurring prior to the merger to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. In addition, for a period of six years after the merger, Reliance has agreed to cause RSAC’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws to contain provisions regarding exculpation, indemnification and advancement of expenses for officers, directors and employees that overall are no less generous than those included in the current EMJ certificate of incorporation and bylaws and to honor all of EMJ’s obligations to indemnify all officers, directors and employees for acts and omissions by such persons prior to the completion of the merger to the extent such obligations existed on January 17, 2006. These obligations survive the effectiveness of the merger and shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with the terms of the relevant document until the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations. For a period of six years after the merger, Reliance has agreed to maintain the current policies of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance and fiduciary liability insurance maintained by EMJ with respect to claims arising from or related to facts or events that occurred prior to the merger and with a total insured coverage of $50 million of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance and $5 million of fiduciary liability insurance; provided that, if the annual insurance premium payments for both insured coverages exceed a specified amount, Reliance will obtain a policy with the most advantageous terms available for the maximum premium amount.
Section 16 Matters
      Each of Reliance and EMJ has agreed to take all required steps to exempt any dispositions of EMJ common stock or acquisitions of Reliance shares in connection with the merger from the SEC’s “short-swing profit” rules.

84


Table of Contents

New York Stock Exchange
      Reliance will cause (1) the Reliance shares to be issued in the merger to be approved for listing on the New York Stock Exchange and (2) the EMJ common stock to be delisted from the New York Stock Exchange and deregistered under the Exchange Act.
Affiliates
      EMJ will use reasonable efforts to cause each of its affiliates to enter into a written agreement providing that they will not offer or sell any of the Reliance shares issued to them in the merger in violation of the Securities Act or the related SEC rules.
Conditions to Closing
      Each of the respective obligations of EMJ and Reliance to complete the merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver of various conditions, including:
  •  the adoption of the merger agreement by EMJ stockholders;
 
  •  the absence of any law, order, injunction or legal restraint prohibiting completion of the merger;
 
  •  the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period under the HSR Act;
 
  •  the receipt of all other governmental agency consents, approvals, permits, orders and authorizations required to complete the merger other than those that the failure to make or obtain would not render the merger illegal;
 
  •  the approval for listing on the New York Stock Exchange of the Reliance common stock to be issued in the merger;
 
  •  the absence of any stop order issued by the SEC suspending the effectiveness of this proxy statement/ prospectus and the absence of any proceedings initiated or threatened by the SEC for that purpose;
 
  •  the truth and correctness of the other party’s representation and warranties as of the date of the completion of the merger, except where the failure of such representations and warranties to be true and correct, individually or in the aggregate, has not had and would not have a material adverse effect, and the receipt of a certificate of an executive officer of the other party to that effect;
 
  •  the other party having performed or complied with its agreements and covenants in the merger agreement in all material respects, and the receipt of a certificate of an executive officer of the other party to that effect;
 
  •  the absence of any pending or threatened litigation with a reasonable likelihood of success (1) challenging the merger or seeking to obtain damages that are material to EMJ; (2) seeking to limit in any material way the ownership or operation by EMJ, Reliance or any of their respective subsidiaries of any material portion of the business or assets of such entities, or to compel such entities to dispose of or hold separate a material portion of their business or assets as a result of the merger; (3) seeking to impose limitations on Reliance’s ownership and/or voting rights of EMJ’s common stock; or (4) seeking to prohibit Reliance’s control in any material respect of EMJ’s business or operations;
 
  •  the absence of any material adverse effect on the other party; and
 
  •  the receipt of an opinion from the party’s counsel that the merger will constitute a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code.

85


Table of Contents

Amendments, Extensions and Waivers
Amendments
      Reliance and EMJ may amend the merger agreement at any time to the extent legally permissible prior to completion of the merger; provided, however, after the EMJ stockholders approve the merger agreement, no amendment may be made that requires further approval by stockholders under applicable law or the rules of any relevant stock exchange. All amendments to the merger agreement must be in writing signed by each party.
Extensions and Waivers
      At any time prior to completion of the merger, any party to the merger agreement may:
  •  extend the time for the performance of any of the obligations or other acts of the other party to the merger agreement;
 
  •  waive any inaccuracies in the representations and warranties of the other party contained in the merger agreement or in any document delivered pursuant to the merger agreement; and
 
  •  waive compliance by the other party with any of the agreements or conditions contained in the merger agreement.
      All extensions and waivers must be in writing and signed by the party against whom the waiver is to be effective.
Expenses
      Each of Reliance and EMJ will pay its own costs and expenses incurred as a result of the merger and the merger agreement. Reliance and EMJ will share equally in connection with any filings required under the HSR Act. Reliance will be solely responsible for the costs associated with the printing and mailing of this proxy statement/ prospectus and the expenses incurred in filing this proxy statement/ prospectus with the SEC.

86


Table of Contents

MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
General
      The following is a summary of the material United States federal income tax consequences of the merger that are expected to apply generally to a U.S. holder of EMJ common stock that surrenders all of its common stock for shares of Reliance common stock and cash in the merger. The summary is based on the Code, United States Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder, administrative rulings and court decisions in effect as of the date hereof, all of which are subject to change or differing interpretations (possibly with retroactive effect). The consequences summarized below are based upon representation letters from each of Reliance, EMJ and RSAC, which will be reconfirmed prior to the merger.
      For purposes of this summary, the term “U.S. holder” means:
  •  a citizen or resident of the United States;
 
  •  a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation for United States federal income tax purposes, created or organized under the laws of the United States or of any state or the District of Columbia;
 
  •  a trust if it (1) is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the United States and one or more United States persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (2) was in existence on August 20, 1996 and has a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury regulations to continue to be treated as a United States person; or
 
  •  an estate that is subject to United States federal income tax on its income regardless of its source.
      If a partnership holds EMJ common stock, the tax treatment of a partner of such partnership will generally depend on the status of the partners and the activities of the partnership. A U.S. holder that is a partner in a partnership which holds EMJ common stock should consult its tax advisor.
      This summary only addresses EMJ stockholders that hold their shares of EMJ common stock as a capital asset within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code. Further, this summary does not address all aspects of United States federal taxation that may be relevant to an EMJ stockholder in light of such holder’s particular circumstances or that may be applicable to holders subject to special treatment under United States federal income tax laws (including, for example, tax-exempt organizations, dealers in securities or foreign currencies, banks, insurance companies, financial institutions or persons that hold their EMJ common stock as part of a hedge, straddle, constructive sale or conversion transaction, holders subject to the alternative minimum tax provisions of the Code, holders whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, holders that exercise appraisal rights, or holders who acquired their EMJ common stock through the exercise of an employee stock option or otherwise as compensation).
      In addition, the following summary does not address the tax consequences of the merger under state, local and non-United States laws. Furthermore, the following summary does not address any of the following:
  •  the tax consequences of transactions effectuated before, after or at the same time as the merger, whether or not they are in connection with the merger, including, without limitation, transactions in which EMJ shares are acquired or Reliance shares are disposed of;
 
  •  the tax consequences to holders of options issued by EMJ or Reliance which are assumed, replaced, exercised or converted, as the case may be, in connection with the merger;
 
  •  the tax consequences of the receipt of Reliance shares other than in exchange for EMJ shares; or
 
  •  tax implications of a failure of the merger to qualify as a reorganization.
      No ruling has been requested from the IRS regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger. No assurance can be given that the IRS would not assert, or that a court would not sustain, a position contrary to any of the tax consequences summarized below.

87


Table of Contents

      HOLDERS ARE URGED TO CONSULT WITH THEIR TAX ADVISORS REGARDING THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER TO THEM, INCLUDING THE EFFECTS OF UNITED STATES FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL, FOREIGN AND OTHER TAX LAWS.
      The merger is intended to qualify as a reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code for United States federal income tax purposes. It is a condition to EMJ’s and Reliance’s obligations to consummate the merger that each of them receive an opinion from their respective tax counsel, dated as of the closing date of the merger, to the effect that the merger will be treated for federal income tax purposes as a reorganization qualifying under the provisions of Section 368(a) of the Code. Reliance and EMJ expect to be able to obtain the tax opinions if, as expected, Reliance, EMJ and RSAC are able to deliver customary representations to their respective tax counsel, and there is no adverse change in U.S. federal income tax law.
      If any of the representations or assumptions upon which the opinions are based is inconsistent with the actual facts relating to the merger, the tax consequences of the merger could be adversely affected. The determination by tax counsel as to whether the merger will be treated as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code will depend upon the facts and law existing at the effective time of the merger. EMJ stockholders should be aware that the tax opinions discussed in this section are not binding on the IRS, the IRS could adopt a contrary position and a contrary position could be sustained by a court.
      Assuming the merger qualifies as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, EMJ, Reliance and RSAC will each be a party to the reorganization, and none of EMJ, Reliance and RSAC will recognize any gain or loss solely as a result of the merger. Additionally, the material United States federal income tax consequences of the merger to U.S. holders of EMJ common stock are, in general, as follows:
Exchange of EMJ Common Stock for Reliance Common Stock and Cash
      An EMJ stockholder that receives a combination of Reliance common stock and cash in exchange for all of its shares of EMJ common stock will recognize gain (but not loss) in an amount equal to the lesser of (1) the sum of the amount of cash and the fair market value of the Reliance common stock received in the merger minus the stockholder’s aggregate tax basis in its EMJ common stock surrendered therefor and (2) the amount of cash the stockholder receives in the merger.
      Any gain recognized will be capital gain unless the EMJ stockholder’s receipt of cash has the effect of a distribution of a dividend, in which case the gain will be treated as ordinary dividend income to the extent of the holder’s ratable share of Reliance’s accumulated earnings and profits, as calculated for U.S. federal income tax purposes. For purposes of determining whether an EMJ stockholder’s receipt of cash has the effect of a distribution of a dividend, the EMJ stockholder will be treated as if it first exchanged all of its EMJ common stock solely in exchange for Reliance common stock and then Reliance immediately redeemed a portion of that stock for the cash that the holder actually received in the merger. Receipt of cash will generally not have the effect of a distribution of a dividend to the EMJ stockholder if such receipt is, with respect to the EMJ stockholder, “not essentially equivalent to a dividend” or “substantially disproportionate,” each within the meaning of Section 302(b) of the Code. The IRS has indicated in rulings that any reduction in the interest of a minority shareholder that owns a small number of shares in a publicly and widely held corporation and that exercises no control over corporate affairs would result in capital gain (as opposed to dividend) treatment under these rules. However, in determining the interest of a shareholder in Reliance for purposes of these rules, certain constructive ownership rules must be taken into account. Any capital gain will be long-term if the EMJ stockholder’s holding period for its EMJ common stock is more than one year as of the date of the exchange.
      An EMJ stockholder’s aggregate tax basis in the Reliance common stock received in the merger (including any fractional shares deemed received and exchanged for cash) will be equal to the stockholder’s aggregate tax basis in its EMJ common stock, decreased by the amount of any cash received and increased by the amount of any gain recognized. An EMJ stockholder’s holding period for Reliance

88


Table of Contents

common stock received in the merger (including any fractional shares deemed received and exchanged for cash) will include the holding period of the EMJ common stock surrendered in the merger.
Cash in Lieu of Fractional Shares
      A holder of EMJ common stock who receives cash in lieu of a fractional share of Reliance common stock generally will be treated as having received such fractional share in the merger and then as having received cash in exchange for such fractional share. Gain or loss generally will be recognized based on the difference between the amount of cash received in lieu of the fractional share and the tax basis allocated to such fractional share of Reliance common stock. Subject to the discussion above regarding possible dividend treatment, such gain or loss generally will be long-term capital gain or loss if, as of the effective date of the merger, the holding period for such shares is greater than one year.
Backup Withholding and Information Reporting
      In general, an EMJ stockholder receiving cash in the merger will be subject to information reporting to the IRS. In addition, backup withholding at the applicable rate (currently 28%) will generally apply to cash payments if the exchanging EMJ stockholder fails to provide an accurate taxpayer identification number or fails to properly certify that it is not subject to backup withholding (generally on an IRS Form W-9). Certain holders (including, among others, U.S. corporations) are not subject to information reporting or backup withholding, but they may still need to furnish an IRS Form W-9 or otherwise establish an exemption. Any amount withheld as backup withholding from payments to an exchanging EMJ stockholder will be creditable against the EMJ stockholder’s federal income tax liability, provided that it timely furnishes the required information to the IRS. EMJ stockholders should consult their tax advisors as to their qualifications for exemption from backup withholding and the procedure for obtaining an exemption.
      The preceding discussion is intended only as a summary of certain U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger and does not purport to be a complete analysis or discussion of all of the merger’s potential tax effects. EMJ stockholders are urged to consult their own tax advisors as to the specific tax consequences to them of the merger, including tax return reporting requirements, and the applicability and effect of federal, state, local and other applicable tax laws.

89


Table of Contents

THE VOTING AGREEMENT
      The following description, which sets forth the material provisions of the voting agreement under which the Kelso Funds have, among other things, agreed to vote in favor of the merger and the merger agreement, is subject to the full text of, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, the voting agreement, which is attached to this proxy statement/ prospectus as Annex B and which is incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus. We urge you to read the voting agreement carefully and in its entirety.
      Reliance has entered into a voting agreement with each of the Kelso Funds pursuant to which each Kelso Fund has agreed, among other things, to vote all of their shares of EMJ common stock, including shares of EMJ common stock acquired after the date and during the term of the voting agreement, as follows:
  •  in favor of the adoption and approval of the merger agreement, the merger and each of the other actions contemplated by the merger agreement;
 
  •  against approval of any takeover proposal; and
 
  •  against any of the following actions (other than those actions that relate to the merger): (1) any amendment of EMJ’s charter documents, (2) any other action that is designed to or would impede, interfere with, delay, postpone or materially adversely affect the merger or any other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement or (3) any change in any form or manner of the voting rights of any class of capital stock of EMJ.
      The voting agreement terminates upon the earliest to occur of (1) the termination of the merger agreement, (2) the effective time of the merger, (3) EMJ’s board of directors withdrawing or adversely modifying its recommendation of the merger and (4) upon notice by any Kelso Fund and after any amendment or modification of the merger agreement that extends the outside date or otherwise materially and adversely affects such Kelso Fund in its capacity as a stockholder of EMJ.
      The voting agreement prohibits each of the Kelso Funds from selling or disposing of any shares or options to acquire shares of EMJ common stock beneficially owned by these entities, except for transfers to its general or limited partners and only if such partner agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions of the voting agreement.
      Except as provided by the merger agreement and applicable law, and except in connection with the exercise of the fiduciary duties of an affiliate of the Kelso Funds as a director of EMJ, each of the Kelso Funds, solely in its capacity as an EMJ stockholder and not in any other capacity, has agreed that neither it nor any of its officers, directors, employees, advisors, agents, partners or other representatives will, directly or indirectly:
  •  initiate, negotiate, solicit, encourage or provide confidential information to facilitate the submission of any takeover proposal;
 
  •  enter into any agreement with respect to any takeover proposal; or
 
  •  participate in any discussions or negotiations regarding, or furnish to any person any information with respect to, or take any other action to facilitate any inquiries or the making of any proposal that constitutes, or may reasonably be expected to lead to, any takeover proposal.
      In addition, each of the Kelso Funds has agreed to immediately cease and cause to be terminated any discussions or negotiations between such entity and any person that may be ongoing with respect to any takeover proposal.
      At the close of business on January 17, 2006, the date of the merger agreement, the Kelso Funds owned 25,174,634 shares of EMJ common stock, representing approximately 50.1% of the shares of EMJ common stock outstanding on that date. As of the record date for EMJ’s special meeting, the Kelso Funds owned 25,174,634 shares of EMJ common stock, representing approximately 50.1% of the shares of EMJ common stock outstanding on that date.

90


Table of Contents

INFORMATION ABOUT RELIANCE
General
      Reliance is one of the five largest metals service center companies in the United States. Reliance’s network of 24 divisions, 21 operating subsidiaries and one 70%-owned company operates more than 100 locations in 32 states, Belgium and South Korea. Through this network, Reliance provides metals processing services and distributes a full line of more than 90,000 metal products, including alloy, aluminum, brass, copper, carbon steel, titanium, stainless steel and specialty steel products, to more than 95,000 customers in a broad range of industries. Reliance delivers products from facilities in Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Washington and Wisconsin. One of Reliance’s subsidiaries has a location in South Korea that serves the Asian semiconductor market. Another subsidiary opened a metals service center in Belgium in January 2003 to service the European aerospace market. In addition, Reliance, through its 70%-owned company, has entered into an agreement to acquire a facility in the People’s Republic of China.
      Reliance shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “RS.” Reliance’s principal executive offices are located at 350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 5100, Los Angeles, California 90071, and its telephone number is (213) 687-7700 and its Website is located at http://www.rsac.com. Information contained on Reliance’s Website is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/ prospectus.
Management and Additional Information
      Certain information relating to executive compensation, various Reliance benefit plans (including Reliance’s stock option plans), voting securities, including information regarding the principal holders of those securities, certain relationships and related transactions and other matters regarding Reliance is incorporated by reference or set forth in Reliance’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, which is incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus. EMJ stockholders desiring copies of the Reliance Annual Report on Form 10-K and the other documents incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus may contact Reliance at its address or telephone number indicated under “Where You Can Find More Information” on page 117.

91


Table of Contents

INFORMATION ABOUT EMJ
General
      EMJ was formed on May 3, 1990, when affiliates of Kelso & Companies Inc. acquired control of and combined two leading metals distributors, EMJ (founded in 1921) and Kilsby-Roberts Holding Co. (successor to C.A. Roberts Company, founded in 1916). In connection with the combination of these two companies, EMJ became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Holding. On April 20, 2005, EMJ completed its merger and financial restructuring, pursuant to which Holding was merged with and into a wholly-owned subsidiary of EMJ. EMJ also closed its initial public offering on April 20, 2005.
      EMJ is a leading distributor of specialty metal bar and tubular products used by North American manufacturing companies and has been in business for over 80 years. EMJ purchases over 25,000 different metal products in large quantities from primary producers, including a broad mix of carbon, alloy and stainless steel and aluminum bar, tubular and plate products. EMJ sells these metal products in smaller quantities to over 35,000 customers spanning various industries, including machine tools, industrial equipment, transportation, fluid power, oil, gas and energy, fabricated metal, and construction and agricultural equipment. EMJ distributes its broad range of metal products and provides its customers value-added metal processing and inventory management services from its distribution network of 39 strategically located service and processing centers in the United States and Canada.
      EMJ’s metal processing services consist of cutting to length, burning, sawing, honing, shearing, grinding, polishing and performing other similar services on most of the metal products it sells, all to customer specifications. As part of EMJ’s inventory management services, EMJ schedules deliveries in the quantities and at the times required by just-in-time manufacturing processes employed by a growing number of leading manufacturing companies and provides its customers with an on-time product delivery guarantee.
      EMJ shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “JOR.” The principal executive offices of EMJ are located at 10650 Alameda Street, Lynwood, California 90262, and its telephone number is (323) 567-1122 and its Website is located at http://www.emjmetals.com. Information contained on EMJ’s Website is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus.
Management and Additional Information
      Certain information relating to executive compensation, various EMJ benefit plans (including EMJ’s stock option plans), voting securities, including information regarding the principal holders of those securities, certain relationships and related transactions and other matters regarding EMJ is incorporated by reference or set forth in EMJ’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2005, which is incorporated in this proxy statement/ prospectus by reference. EMJ stockholders desiring copies of EMJ’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and the other documents incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus may contact EMJ at its address or telephone number indicated under “Where You Can Find More Information” on page 117.

92


Table of Contents

RELIANCE
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
      The following unaudited pro forma combined financial statements combine the historical consolidated balance sheets and statements of income of Reliance and EMJ, giving effect to the merger using the purchase method of accounting. Certain historical balance sheet and income statement amounts of EMJ have been reclassified to conform to the financial statement presentation of Reliance.
      We are providing the following information to aid you in your analysis of the financial aspects of the merger. The balance sheet information as of September 30, 2005 and the income statement information for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 were derived from the unaudited financial statements of Reliance and EMJ. The income statement information for the year ended December 31, 2004 was derived from the audited financial statements of Reliance and the unaudited quarterly financial statements of EMJ. The information should be read together with our historical financial statements and related notes contained in the annual reports and other information that we have filed with the SEC and incorporated herein by reference. See “Where You Can Find More Information.”
      The unaudited pro forma combined balance sheet as of September 30, 2005 gives effect to the merger as if it had occurred on September 30, 2005. The unaudited pro forma combined statements of income assume the merger was effected on January 1, 2005 and January 1, 2004 for the pro forma statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and the 12 months ended December 31, 2004, respectively. Other than a difference in accounting for stock-based compensation reflected in the Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements, and the difference in the fiscal year-ends, the accounting policies of Reliance and EMJ are substantially comparable.
      The unaudited pro forma combined financial information is for illustrative purposes only and is based on available information and assumptions that are believed to be reasonable as of the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus. The financial results may have been different had the companies always been combined due to, among other factors, those factors discussed under the section entitled “Risk Factors” on page 30. You should not rely on the pro forma combined financial information as being indicative of the historical results that would have been achieved had the companies always been combined or the future results that Reliance will experience. See “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” on page 28.

93


Table of Contents

RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
As of September 30, 2005
                                     
            Total    
            Pro Forma   Pro Forma
    Reliance   EMJ   Adjustments   Combined
                 
    (In thousands)
Assets
                               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 10,419     $ 8,668     $     $ 19,087  
Accounts receivable, net
    394,326       180,883             575,209  
Inventories
    367,112       251,467       84,500 (a)     703,079  
Prepaids and other current assets
    17,631       11,631             29,262  
Deferred income taxes
    24,573       30,800             55,373  
                         
 
Total current assets
    814,061       483,449       84,500       1,382,010  
Property, plant and equipment, net
    470,924       124,581       226,949 (b)     822,454  
Goodwill
    404,464             384,685 (c)     789,149  
Net cash surrender value of life insurance policies
          50,509             50,509  
Other assets (including intangibles)
    38,767       9,288       56,737 (d)     104,792  
                         
   
Total assets
  $ 1,728,216     $ 667,827     $ 752,871     $ 3,148,914  
                         
 
Liabilities & Shareholders’ Equity
                               
Accounts payable
  $ 159,575     $ 157,275     $     $ 316,850  
Accrued expenses
    22,784       39,511             62,295  
Accrued compensation and retirement costs
    47,255       30,699             77,954  
Accrued insurance costs
    24,691                   24,691  
Deferred income taxes
    138                   138  
Current maturities of long-term obligations
    49,164       3,222             52,386  
                         
 
Total current liabilities
    303,607       230,707             534,314  
Long-term debt
    365,275       295,516       412,959 (e)     1,073,750  
Capital lease obligations
    5,542                   5,542  
Other long-term liabilities
    16,030       13,656       4,145 (f)     33,831  
Deferred income taxes
    55,613       2,645       134,500 (g)     192,758  
Minority interest
    14,648                   14,648  
Shareholders Equity:
                               
Common equity
    321,947       360,466       (33,896 ) (h)     648,517  
Retained earnings (losses)
    645,905       (234,261 )     234,261 (h)     645,905  
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    (351 )     (902 )     902 (h)     (351 )
                         
 
Total shareholders’ equity
    967,501       125,303       201,267       1,294,071  
                         
   
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  $ 1,728,216     $ 667,827     $ 752,871     $ 3,148,914  
                         

94


Table of Contents

RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
(a) Inventories — Represents the pro forma adjustment to record inventories at fair market value based on preliminary estimates.
(b) Property, Plant, & Equipment — Represents the pro forma adjustment to record the estimated fair values of real and personal property based upon preliminary estimates. The values of these assets are subject to adjustments upon completion of third party valuations.
(c) Goodwill — The estimated purchase price of the acquisition is based upon a price of $13.00 per share of EMJ common stock, payable approximately half in cash and half in Reliance common stock. Each EMJ shareholder will receive $6.50 in cash and a fraction of a Reliance share, for each share of EMJ common stock. The value of Reliance common stock issued for the purpose of the pro forma purchase price allocation assumes a Reliance average price of $70.01, resulting in 0.0928 of a Reliance share issued for each EMJ share.
Under the purchase method of accounting, the purchase price is allocated to EMJ’s net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values as of September 30, 2005. The fair values assigned to these assets and liabilities is preliminary and is subject to change pending the completion of third-party fair value appraisals as well as pending any additional information that may come to our knowledge potentially impacting the fair values of those assets and liabilities. The purchase price of approximately $692.6 million, which includes the equity value of the outstanding shares, the cash out of the Holding options and the Reliance acquisition costs, was allocated to EMJ’s assets and liabilities on a fair value basis and resulted in estimated goodwill of approximately $384.7 million.
(d) Other assets/ Identifiable intangible assets — Represents the pro forma adjustments to record the estimated fair values of identifiable intangible assets relating to tradenames, certain customer relationships or other intangible assets from the acquisition based upon preliminary estimates. The values of these assets are subject to adjustments upon completion of third party valuations.
(e) Debt — Represents the pro forma adjustment for incremental borrowings on Reliance’s existing line of credit to finance the cash portion of the total purchase price consideration, the adjustment to record EMJ’s senior secured notes at estimated fair market value, and to reflect additional EMJ borrowings for their share of the merger related costs. The final debt fair value determination will be based on prevailing market interest rates at the completion of the acquisition and the necessary adjustment will be amortized as a reduction (in the case of a premium to book value) or an increase (in the case of a discount to book value) to interest expense over the remaining life of the individual debt issues.
(f) Other long-term liabilities/ Pension and Postretirement Benefit Obligations — Represents the pro forma adjustments to record pension and postretirement benefit obligations at fair value, based upon actuarial reports dated March 31, 2005. The final value determination of the pension and postretirement benefit obligations may differ from these estimates due to potential changes in discount rates and the rate of return on plan assets up to the date of completion of the merger.
(g) Deferred Income Taxes — The deferred tax liability represents the pro forma adjustment for the additional book/tax differences created from the allocation of purchase price to the fair values of the acquired assets and liabilities assumed. These estimates are based on the estimated prospective statutory tax rate of 40% for the combined company and could change based on changes in the applicable tax rates and finalization of the combined company’s tax position.
(h) Shareholders’ Equity/ Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss — Represents pro forma adjustments to eliminate the historical shareholders’ equity of EMJ and the issuance of 4,662,002 shares of Reliance common stock in connection with the acquisition. This assumes 50,237,094 shares of EMJ common stock outstanding and an average closing price of Reliance common stock for the pricing period of $70.01 per share.

95


Table of Contents

RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the nine months ended September 30, 2005
                                   
            Total    
            Pro Forma   Pro Forma
    Reliance   EMJ   Adjustments   Combined
                 
    (In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Net sales
  $ 2,498,373     $ 1,313,189     $     $ 3,811,562  
Other income, net
    2,709             1,147 (b)     3,856  
                         
      2,501,082       1,313,189       1,147       3,815,418  
Costs and expenses:
                               
 
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown below)
    1,831,474       993,491             2,824,965  
 
Warehouse, delivery, selling, general and administrative
    375,613       191,912 (a)     18,790 (b)     586,315  
 
Depreciation and amortization
    34,806       8,283       15,603 (c)     58,692  
 
Interest expense
    19,290       41,272       (8,532 ) (b),(d)     52,030  
                         
      2,261,183       1,234,958       25,861       3,522,002  
                         
Income before minority interest and income taxes
    239,899       78,231       (24,714 )     293,416  
Minority interest
    (6,271 )                 (6,271 )
                         
Income before provision for income taxes
    233,628       78,231       (24,714 )     287,145  
Provision for income taxes
    88,779       (22,658 )     42,994 (e)     109,115  
                         
Net income
    144,849       100,889       (67,708 )     178,030  
                         
Net income available to common shareholders
  $ 144,849     $ 100,889     $ (67,708 )   $ 178,030  
                         
Earnings per share — diluted
  $ 4.38     $ 2.55             $ 4.72 (f)
                         
Weighted average shares outstanding — diluted
    33,062,949       39,529,000               37,724,951 (f)
                         
Earnings per share — basic
  $ 4.40     $ 2.73             $ 4.74 (f)
                         
Weighted average shares outstanding — basic
    32,888,726       36,951,000               37,550,728 (f)
                         

96


Table of Contents

RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2004
                                   
            Total    
            Pro Forma   Pro Forma
    Reliance   EMJ   Adjustments   Combined
                 
    (In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Net sales
  $ 2,943,034     $ 1,474,655     $     $ 4,417,689  
Other income, net
    4,168             (3,536 ) (b)     632  
                         
      2,947,202       1,474,655       (3,536 )     4,418,321  
Operating expenses:
                               
 
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown below)
    2,110,848       1,064,607             3,175,455  
 
Warehouse, delivery, selling, general and administrative
    483,887       270,174 (a)     18,238 (b)     772,299  
 
Depreciation and amortization
    44,627       11,576       20,804 (c)     77,007  
 
Interest expense
    28,690       88,319       (48,745 ) (b),(d)     68,264  
                         
      2,668,052       1,434,676       (9,703 )     4,093,025  
                         
Income before minority interest and income taxes
    279,150       39,979       6,167       325,296  
Minority interest
    (9,182