sv4
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
February 7, 2006
Registration
No. 333-
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form S-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
California |
|
5051 |
|
95-1142616 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 5100
Los Angeles, California 90071
(213) 687-7700
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of Registrants principal executive
offices)
David H. Hannah
Chief Executive Officer
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 5100
Los Angeles, California 90071
(213) 687-7700
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of agent for service)
With copies to:
|
|
|
|
|
David R. Decker, Esq. |
|
William S. Johnson |
|
Mark A. Conley, Esq. |
J. Brett Pritchard, Esq. |
|
Vice President, Chief Financial |
|
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP |
Lord, Bissell & Brook LLP |
|
Officer and Secretary |
|
2029 Century Park East, Suite 2600 |
300 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 800 |
|
Earle M. Jorgensen Company |
|
Los Angeles, California 90067 |
Los Angeles, California 90071 |
|
10650 Alameda Street |
|
(310) 788-4400 |
(213) 485-1500 |
|
Lynwood, California 90262
(323) 567-1122 |
|
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: As soon as practicable after this Registration
Statement becomes effective and upon completion of the merger
described in the enclosed proxy statement/ prospectus.
If the securities being registered on this Form are being
offered in connection with the formation of a holding company
and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check the
following
box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum |
|
|
Proposed Maximum |
|
|
Amount of |
Title of Each Class of |
|
|
Amount to be |
|
|
Offering Price |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Registration |
Securities to be Registered |
|
|
Registered |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
Offering Price |
|
|
Fee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value
|
|
|
6,248,423(1) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$391,408,685(2) |
|
|
$41,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The number of shares of the Registrants common stock to be
registered pursuant to this Registration Statement represents
(a) the maximum number of shares of the Registrants
common stock issuable in connection with the merger based on
50,237,094 outstanding shares of common stock, par value
$0.001 per share, of Earle M. Jorgensen Company, or EMJ, as
of February 2, 2006 and assuming the maximum exchange ratio
of 0.1207 of a share of the Registrants common stock for
each share of EMJ common stock pursuant to the merger,
(b) the maximum number of shares of the Registrants
common stock issuable in the merger assuming that all
outstanding options to purchase 808,000 shares of EMJ
common stock are exercised prior to the merger and assuming a
maximum exchange ratio of 0.1207 of Registrants common
stock for each share of EMJ common stock and (c) the
maximum number of shares of the Registrants common stock
to be issued to the Earle M. Jorgensen Retirement Savings Plan
pursuant to EMJs maximum obligation under such plan to
contribute 723,109 shares of EMJ common stock and assuming
a maximum exchange ratio of 0.1207 of Registrants common
stock for each share of EMJ common stock. |
|
(2) |
Estimated solely for purposes of calculating the registration
fee pursuant to Rules 457(c) and 457(f)(1) of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act. The
proposed maximum aggregate offering price is the market value of
the approximate number of shares of EMJ common stock to be
cancelled and exchanged in the merger (calculated as set forth
in note (1) above) in respect of the stock portion of the
merger consideration. Therefore, the proposed maximum aggregate
offering price is equal to the sum of
(a) (i) 51,045,094, the maximum number of shares of
EMJ common stock to be cancelled in the merger assuming the
exercise of all outstanding options to purchase EMJ common stock
prior to the merger multiplied by (ii) $7.47 (which is the
difference between (A) the market value per share of EMJ
common stock, based on the average of the high and low trading
prices of EMJ common stock as reported on the New York Stock
Exchange on February 2, 2006, which was $13.97, or the EMJ
average stock price, and (B) the $6.50 in cash to be paid
by the Registrant for each outstanding share of EMJ common stock
cancelled pursuant to the merger agreement), and
(b) (i) 723,109, the maximum number of shares of EMJ
common stock to be issued to the Earle M. Jorgensen Retirement
Savings Plan pursuant to EMJs obligation under such plan
to contribute shares of EMJ common stock, multiplied by
(ii) the EMJ average stock price. |
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the
Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as
the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may
determine.
The
information in this proxy statement/ prospectus is not complete
and may be changed. Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. may
not distribute and issue the shares of Reliance common stock
being registered pursuant to this registration statement until
the registration statement filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission is declared effective. This proxy statement/
prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and Reliance
is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any
jurisdiction where such offer or sales is not
permitted.
|
SUBJECT TO
COMPLETION DATED FEBRUARY 6, 2006
Earle M. Jorgensen
Company
10650 Alameda Street
Lynwood, California
90262
Merger Proposal
Proxy Statement/
Prospectus
,
2006
Dear Stockholder:
We are pleased to invite you to a special meeting of
stockholders of Earle M. Jorgensen Company, or EMJ, to be held
on ,
2006,
at : a.m.,
local time, at
the , , ,
California. At the special meeting, our stockholders will be
asked to consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt and approve
the Agreement and Plan of Merger, or merger agreement, dated as
of January 17, 2006, by and among EMJ, RSAC Acquisition
Corp., or RSAC, and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co., or
Reliance.
Reliance and EMJ have agreed on a merger transaction pursuant to
which Reliance will acquire EMJ. If we complete the merger, EMJ
will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Reliance and EMJ common
stock will no longer be publicly traded. Reliance has offered
total consideration for each share of EMJ common stock of
approximately $13.00. In particular, upon completion of the
merger, you will be entitled to receive for each share of EMJ
common stock you own $6.50 in cash and between 0.0892 and 0.1207
of a share of Reliance common stock, depending on the average
trading price per share of Reliance common stock on the New York
Stock Exchange during a 20 trading day period ending with and
including the second trading day prior to completion of the
merger. The formula for determining the appropriate fraction of
a share of Reliance common stock to be issued in exchange for
each share of EMJ common stock is set forth in detail in the
accompanying proxy statement/ prospectus.
Depending on the exchange ratio and the number of shares of EMJ
common stock outstanding, Reliance will issue a minimum of
approximately 4.5 million and a maximum of approximately
6.1 million shares of common stock. Therefore, immediately
after completion of the merger, EMJ stockholders will hold a
minimum of approximately 11.9% and a maximum of approximately
15.5% of Reliances then outstanding common stock.
The exchange ratio will not be determined until after the date
of the special meeting. Therefore, when you are asked to vote on
the merger at the time of the special meeting, you will not know
the precise value of the merger consideration that you will
receive on the date the merger is completed. Reliance common
stock is quoted on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
RS. On February 3, 2006, the closing sales
price of a share of Reliance common stock was $81.57. EMJ common
stock is quoted on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol
JOR. On February 3, 2006, the closing sales
price of a share of EMJ common stock was $13.94.
EMJs board of directors determined that the merger
agreement is advisable and in the best interests of EMJ and its
stockholders. Accordingly, EMJs board of directors
unanimously approved the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, and
unanimously recommends that you vote FOR the
adoption and the approval of the merger agreement at the special
meeting.
We encourage you to read the accompanying proxy statement/
prospectus carefully because it explains the proposed merger,
the documents related to the merger, the special meeting and
other related matters. In particular, please see the section
entitled Risk Factors beginning on page 30 of
this proxy statement/ prospectus. You can also obtain other
information about EMJ and Reliance from documents each party has
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
|
|
|
David M. Roderick
Chairman of the Board
Earle M. Jorgensen Company |
|
Maurice S. Nelson, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
Earle M. Jorgensen Company |
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved the securities
to be issued pursuant to this proxy statement/ prospectus or
passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this proxy statement/
prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
The date of this proxy statement/ prospectus
is ,
2006,
and it is first being mailed or otherwise delivered to EMJ
stockholders on or
about ,
2006.
Earle M. Jorgensen Company
10650 Alameda Street
Lynwood, California 90262
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To Be Held
On ,
2006
We will hold a special meeting of stockholders of Earle M.
Jorgensen Company, or EMJ,
on ,
2006,
at : a.m.,
local time,
at located
at ,
California. The purpose of the special meeting is to:
|
|
|
(1) allow you to consider and vote on a proposal to adopt
and approve an Agreement and Plan of Merger, or merger
agreement, dated as of January 17, 2006, by and among EMJ,
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co., or Reliance, and RSAC
Acquisition Corp., a newly-formed wholly-owned subsidiary of
Reliance, or RSAC, pursuant to which EMJ will merge with and
into RSAC, with RSAC as the surviving corporation; and |
|
|
(2) transact any other business that may properly come
before the special meeting or any adjournment or postponement of
the special meeting. |
The accompanying proxy statement/ prospectus describes the
proposed merger, the merger agreement and related matters in
more detail. A copy of the merger agreement is attached to this
proxy statement/ prospectus as Annex A. We encourage you to
read the entire proxy statement/ prospectus carefully. In
particular, you should carefully consider the discussion
entitled Risk Factors beginning on page 30. The
proxy statement/ prospectus sets forth certain appraisal rights
that may exist in the event the proposed merger agreement is
approved and you dissent to the merger in a timely manner and in
accordance with Delaware law.
EMJs board of directors set 2006, as the record date
for the special meeting. As a result, holders of record of EMJ
common stock at the close of business
on ,
2006 are entitled to notice of, and to vote with respect to, all
matters to be acted upon at the special meeting or any
adjournment or postponement of the special meeting.
EMJs board of directors unanimously approved the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, including the merger, and unanimously recommends that
EMJ stockholders vote FOR the adoption and approval
of the merger agreement.
All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the special
meeting in person. However, whether or not you plan to attend
the special meeting in person, you are urged to promptly submit
your proxy:
|
|
|
|
|
by completing, signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy
card(s) in the envelope provided, |
|
|
|
by telephone, or |
|
|
|
over the Internet. |
The proxy card(s) requires no postage if mailed in the United
States in the enclosed, self-addressed return envelope. You may
revoke your proxy in the manner described in the accompanying
proxy statement/ prospectus at any time before your shares have
been voted at the special meeting, including by attending the
meeting and voting your shares in person.
Your vote is important. If you own shares directly, your
failure to vote those shares or an abstention from voting will
have the same effect as a vote against the merger. If you hold
your shares through a broker and fail to direct your broker as
to how those shares are to be voted, the broker will not vote
those shares. This will also have the same effect as a vote
against the adoption and approval of the merger agreement. If
you are a participant in the EMJ retirement savings plan and you
fail to direct the plans trustee as to how those shares
are to be voted, the trustee will vote those shares in the same
proportion as the votes of shares for which the trustee has
received directions from other participants in the retirement
savings plan.
You should not send EMJ stock certificates with your proxy
card(s). After completion of the merger, the exchange/paying
agent will send you written instructions for exchanging EMJ
stock certificates for cash and Reliance stock certificates.
If you have any questions, or need assistance in voting your
proxy, you may call William S. Johnson, EMJs secretary, at
(323) 567-1122.
|
|
|
By order of the Board of Directors |
|
|
William S. Johnson |
|
VICE PRESIDENT, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER |
|
AND SECRETARY |
Lynwood, California
,
2006
REFERENCES TO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
This proxy statement/ prospectus incorporates important business
and financial information about Reliance and EMJ that is not
included in, or delivered with, this proxy statement/
prospectus. You can obtain documents incorporated by reference
in this proxy statement/ prospectus, other than certain exhibits
to incorporated information, by requesting them in writing or by
telephone from the appropriate company at the following
addresses and telephone numbers, or by visiting the following
Websites:
|
|
|
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. |
|
Earle M. Jorgensen Company |
350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 5100
|
|
10650 Alameda Street |
Los Angeles, California 90071
|
|
Lynwood, California 90262 |
Attention: Investor Relations
|
|
Attention: Investor Relations |
Telephone: (213) 687-7700
|
|
Telephone: (323) 567-1122 |
Website: www.rsac.com
|
|
Website: www.emjmetals.com |
You will not be charged for any of these documents that you
request. EMJ stockholders requesting documents should do so
by ,
2006, in order to receive them before the special meeting.
For a more detailed description about the information
incorporated in this proxy statement/ prospectus, see
Where You Can Find More Information on page 117.
EMJ has supplied all information contained or incorporated by
reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus relating to EMJ,
and Reliance has supplied all information contained or
incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus
relating to Reliance.
Information contained on Reliances and EMJs Websites
is not incorporated by reference into this proxy
statement/prospectus.
You should rely only on the information contained or
incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/prospectus. We
have not authorized anyone to provide you with information that
is different. This proxy statement/ prospectus may only be used
where it is legal to sell these securities. The information in
this proxy statement/ prospectus may only be accurate on the
date of this proxy statement/ prospectus.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
Conditions to the Completion of the Merger
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Termination Fee to be Paid by EMJ
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Accounting Treatment of the Merger
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
Comparative Market Prices and Dividends
|
|
|
14 |
|
Surrender of EMJ Stock Certificates
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
Management and Operations Following the Merger
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
EMJs Financing Arrangements
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
Restrictions on Sale of Shares by Affiliates of EMJ and Reliance
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO. UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
|
|
|
94 |
|
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO. NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO
FORMA COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
|
|
|
95 |
|
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO. UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
COMBINED STATEMENT OF INCOME
|
|
|
96 |
|
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO. UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
COMBINED STATEMENT OF INCOME
|
|
|
97 |
|
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO. NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO
FORMA COMBINED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
Description of Reliance Capital Stock
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
Special Meetings of the Board
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
Special Meetings of the Shareholders
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
iii
iv
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT
THE MERGER AND THE SPECIAL MEETING
The following are some questions that you, as a stockholder
of Earle M. Jorgensen Company, or EMJ, may have regarding the
merger and the special meeting of EMJ stockholders and brief
answers to those questions. We urge you to read carefully this
proxy statement/ prospectus, including the documents included as
annexes, because the information in this section does not
provide all the information that might be important to you with
respect to the matters being considered at the special meeting.
Additional important information is also contained in the
documents that are incorporated by reference in this proxy
statement/ prospectus.
About the Merger
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What is the purpose of the special meeting? |
|
A: |
|
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co., or Reliance, is
proposing to acquire EMJ. You are being asked to vote to adopt
and approve the Agreement and Plan of Merger, or the merger
agreement, dated as of January 17, 2006, by and among EMJ,
Reliance and RSAC Acquisition Corp, or RSAC, through which EMJ
will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Reliance. Upon
completion of the merger, EMJ common stock will no longer be
publicly traded, and you will receive consideration, consisting
of cash and a fraction of a share of Reliance common stock, for
each share of EMJ common stock you hold. As part of the merger,
RSAC will change its name to Earle M. Jorgensen Company. For
more information concerning the merger consideration, please see
the section entitled Summary of the Proxy Statement/
Prospectus What You Will Receive beginning on
page 6 of this proxy statement/ prospectus. |
|
Q: |
|
What is this document? |
|
A: |
|
EMJs board of directors is using this document as a proxy
statement to solicit proxies from the holders of EMJ common
stock for use at the special meeting. In addition, Reliance is
sending this document to EMJ stockholders as a prospectus in
connection with the issuance of registered shares of Reliance
common stock in exchange for shares of EMJ common stock in the
merger. |
|
Q: |
|
Does EMJs board of directors recommend that EMJ
stockholders vote FOR the merger agreement? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. EMJs board of directors unanimously recommends that
EMJ stockholders vote FOR the adoption and approval
of the merger agreement. To review the boards reasons for
recommending the merger agreement, please see the section
entitled The Merger EMJs Reasons for the
Merger and The Merger Recommendation of
EMJs Board of Directors beginning on page 52 of
this proxy statement/ prospectus. |
|
Q: |
|
When do you expect to complete the merger? |
|
A: |
|
We expect to complete the merger as soon as possible after EMJ
stockholders adopt and approve the merger agreement at the
special meeting and after the satisfaction or waiver of all
other conditions to the merger, which are described in this
proxy statement/prospectus. We cannot predict when, or if, these
conditions will be satisfied or waived, although we believe the
merger can be completed in the second quarter of 2006. |
1
About the Special Meeting
|
|
|
Q: |
|
When and where is the EMJ special meeting? |
|
A: |
|
The EMJ special meeting will take place
on ,
2006,
at : a.m.,
local time, and will be held
at . |
|
Q: |
|
Who is entitled to vote at the special meeting? |
|
A: |
|
Holders of record of EMJ common stock at the close of business
on ,
2006, which is the date EMJs board of directors has fixed
as the record date for the special meeting, are entitled to vote
at the special meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
What is the required vote to adopt and approve the merger
agreement? |
|
A: |
|
For the merger to occur, the merger agreement must be adopted
and approved by the holders of a majority of the outstanding
shares of EMJ common stock. As a condition to the signing of the
merger agreement, Reliance required certain EMJ stockholders
that hold approximately 50.1% of the outstanding EMJ common
stock to enter into a voting agreement to vote all of their
shares in favor of the adoption and approval of the merger
agreement. Therefore, unless the voting agreement is terminated
prior to the special meeting in accordance with its terms, you
should expect that the merger agreement will be approved at the
special meeting regardless of the votes of any other EMJ
stockholders. For additional information regarding the voting
agreement, including the termination provisions, please see the
summary of the voting agreement under The Voting
Agreement beginning on page 90. |
The stockholders of Reliance are not required to approve the
merger agreement.
|
|
|
Q: |
|
How do I vote shares I own directly? |
|
A: |
|
You can vote in person at the special meeting or you can vote by
telephone, on the Internet or by mail as described below. Votes
by telephone or the Internet must be received by
11:59 p.m., Eastern
Time, ,
2006. We recommend that you vote by proxy, even if you plan to
attend the special meeting. If you abstain from voting or do not
vote your shares, it will have the same effect as voting against
the adoption and approval of the merger agreement. |
|
|
|
If your shares are held in your name, you can vote by proxy as
follows: |
|
|
|
By telephone: Use the toll-free number listed on the
proxy card.
Easy-to-follow voice
prompts allow you to vote your shares. |
|
|
|
By Internet: The Website for Internet voting is
listed on the proxy card. |
|
|
|
By mail: Complete, sign, date and return your proxy
card in the enclosed pre-addressed, postage-paid envelope. |
|
|
|
The telephone and Internet voting procedures use a control
number that appears on your proxy card to authenticate you as a
stockholder of record and to allow you to confirm that your
voting instructions have been correctly recorded. If you vote by
telephone or Internet, you do not need to return the proxy card. |
|
Q: |
|
How do I vote shares I hold through a nominee? |
|
A: |
|
If you hold shares through someone else, such as a stockbroker,
bank or other nominee, you will receive material from that firm
asking how you want to vote. You can complete the firms
voting form and return it to the firm. If the firm offers
telephone or Internet voting, the voting form will contain
instructions on how to access those voting methods. If you do
not provide your broker, bank or nominee with instructions on
how to vote your shares, your broker, bank or other nominee will
not be permitted to vote your shares on the merger agreement,
which will have the same effect as voting against the adoption
and approval of the merger agreement. Therefore, you should be
sure to provide your broker, bank or other nominee with
instructions on how to vote your shares. |
2
|
|
|
|
|
If you intend to vote your nominee shares in person at the
special meeting, you must bring to the special meeting an
account statement or letter from the nominee indicating that you
beneficially owned the shares
on ,
the record date for voting. |
|
Q: |
|
How do I vote shares I hold in the Earle M. Jorgensen
Retirement Savings Plan? |
|
A: |
|
If you hold EMJ common stock in the Earle M. Jorgensen
Retirement Savings Plan, the trustee will vote those shares as
you direct through your voting instructions via telephone,
Internet or the enclosed proxy voting instruction card to
T. Rowe Price Trust Company, as trustee. Your proxy voting
instruction card (or any revocation of your prior proxy
voting instruction card) must be received by the trustee by
5:00 p.m., Eastern Time,
on ,
2006. If the trustee does not receive timely voting instructions
from you, the trustee will vote all shares in the retirement
savings plan for which it did not receive voting directions in
the same proportion as the votes of the retirement savings plan
shares for which it received timely voting directions from other
participants in the retirement savings plan. |
|
Q: |
|
May I change my vote after I submitted my proxy? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. If you are the stockholder of record, you may change your
vote in one of the following ways before your proxy is voted at
the special meeting: |
|
|
|
submit to the secretary of EMJ a revocation letter
with a later date than your proxy card; |
|
|
|
deliver, no later than 11:59 p.m., Eastern
Time,
on ,
2006, a second completed and signed proxy card dated later than
the first signed proxy card; |
|
|
|
vote at a later time, but no later than
11:59 p.m., Eastern Time,
on ,
2006, by telephone or the Internet; or |
|
|
|
attend the special meeting and vote in person. |
|
|
|
If you hold your shares through a broker, bank or other nominee,
you may later revoke your proxy instructions by informing such
firm in accordance with the firms procedures. |
|
|
|
If you hold your shares through the retirement savings plan, you
must: |
|
|
|
deliver, no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time,
on ,
2006, a second completed and signed proxy voting
instruction card dated later than the first signed proxy
voting instruction card; or |
|
|
|
vote at a later time, but no later than
5:00 p.m., Eastern Time,
on ,
2006, by telephone or the Internet. |
|
Q: |
|
Do I need to attend the special meeting in person? |
|
A: |
|
No. It is not necessary for you to attend the special
meeting to vote your shares if EMJ has previously received your
proxy, although you are welcome to attend. |
|
Q: |
|
Should I send in my EMJ stock certificates with my proxy
card? |
|
A: |
|
No. Please do not send your EMJ stock certificates
with your proxy card. After the merger is completed,
Computershare Investor Services, acting as our exchange/paying
agent, will send you instructions (including a letter of
transmittal) explaining how to exchange your shares of EMJ
common stock for the appropriate number of shares of Reliance
common stock and cash. |
|
Q: |
|
What if I receive more than one proxy card or proxy voting
instruction card for the special meeting? |
|
A: |
|
This may mean that your shares of EMJ common stock are held in
different ways or in more than one account. Please complete,
sign, date and return by one of the methods described herein all
proxy cards or proxy voting instruction cards you receive to
ensure that all of your shares of EMJ common stock are voted at
the special meeting. |
3
How to Get More Information
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Where can I find more information about EMJ and Reliance? |
|
A: |
|
Much of the business and financial information about Reliance
and EMJ that may be important to you is not included in this
proxy statement/ prospectus. Instead, this information is
incorporated by reference to documents separately filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, by Reliance and
EMJ. This means that Reliance and EMJ may satisfy its disclosure
obligations to you by referring you to documents separately
filed with the SEC by them. See Where You Can Find More
Information beginning on page 117, for a list of
documents that Reliance and EMJ have incorporated by reference
into this proxy statement/ prospectus and for instructions on
how to obtain copies of these documents. The documents are
available to you without charge. |
|
Q: |
|
Whom do I call if I have questions about the merger or the
special meeting? |
|
A: |
|
If you have any questions about the merger or the special
meeting or if you need additional copies of this proxy
statement/ prospectus or the enclosed proxy card, you should
contact EMJs Secretary, William S. Johnson, at
(323) 567-1122. |
4
SUMMARY OF THE PROXY STATEMENT/ PROSPECTUS
This summary highlights information from this proxy
statement/ prospectus and may not contain all of the information
that is important to you. Accordingly, Reliance and EMJ
encourage you to carefully read this entire proxy statement/
prospectus, including the Annexes, and the documents that are
incorporated by reference. You may obtain a copy of the
documents that Reliance and EMJ have incorporated by reference
without charge by following the instructions in the section
entitled Where You Can Find More Information
beginning on page 117 of this proxy statement/ prospectus.
We have included page references in this summary to direct you
to more complete descriptions of the topics presented in this
summary.
The Companies
|
|
|
Earle M. Jorgensen Company (page 92) |
|
10650 Alameda Street |
|
Lynwood, California 90262 |
|
(323) 567-1122 |
EMJ was formed on May 3, 1990, when affiliates of
Kelso & Companies Inc. acquired control of and combined
two leading metals distributors, EMJ (founded in 1921) and
Kilsby-Roberts Holding Co. (successor to C.A. Roberts Company,
founded in 1916). In connection with the combination of these
two companies, EMJ became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Earle M.
Jorgensen Holding Company, Inc., or Holding, a holding company
formed for the sole purpose of acquiring EMJ. On April 20,
2005, EMJ completed its merger and financial restructuring,
pursuant to which Holding was merged with and into a
wholly-owned subsidiary of EMJ with such subsidiary surviving
the merger.
EMJ is a leading distributor of metal bar and tubular products
used by North American manufacturing companies and has been in
business for over 80 years. EMJ purchases over 25,000
different metal products in large quantities from primary
producers, including a broad mix of carbon, alloy and stainless
steel and aluminum bar, tubular and plate products. EMJ sells
these metal products in smaller quantities to over
35,000 customers spanning various industries, including
machine tools, industrial equipment, transportation, fluid
power, oil, gas and energy, fabricated metal, and construction
and agricultural equipment. EMJ distributes its broad range of
metal products and provides its customers value-added metal
processing and inventory management services from its
distribution network of 39 strategically located service and
processing centers in the United States and Canada.
EMJs revenues for the year ended March 31, 2005 and
the six months ended September 28, 2005 were approximately
$1.6 billion and $856.9 million, respectively, and its
net income for the same periods was approximately
$97.5 million and $41.5 million, respectively.
|
|
|
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (page 91) |
|
350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 5100 |
|
Los Angeles, California 90071 |
|
(213) 687-7700 |
Reliance was founded in 1939 in Los Angeles, California and
began as a fabricator of steel reinforcing bar. Today, Reliance
is one of the five largest metals service center companies in
the United States. Reliances network of 24 divisions, 21
operating subsidiaries and one 70%-owned company, operates more
than 100 locations in 32 states, Belgium and South
Korea. Through its 70%-owned company, Reliance has entered into
an agreement to acquire a facility in the Peoples Republic
of China. Through this network, Reliance provides metals
processing services and distributes a full line of more than
90,000 metal products, including alloy, aluminum, brass, copper,
carbon steel, titanium, stainless steel and specialty steel
products, to more than 95,000 customers in a broad range of
industries. Reliance delivers products from facilities in
Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho,
Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland,
Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire,
New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon,
Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas,
5
Utah, Washington and Wisconsin. One of Reliances
subsidiaries has a location in South Korea that serves the Asian
semiconductor market. Another subsidiary opened a metals service
center in Belgium in January 2003 to service the European
aerospace market.
Reliances net sales for the year ended December 31,
2004 and the nine months ended September 30, 2005 were
approximately $2.9 billion and $2.5 billion,
respectively. Reliances net income for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 was approximately $169.7 million
and $144.8 million, respectively.
|
|
|
RSAC Acquisition Corp. |
|
350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 5100 |
|
Los Angeles, California 90071 |
|
(213) 687-7700 |
RSAC, a Delaware corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Reliance, formed for the purpose of effecting the merger. RSAC
has engaged in no business activities to date and it has no
material assets or liabilities of any kind, other than those
incident to its formation and those incurred in connection with
the merger.
Structure of the Merger (page 75)
On January 17, 2006, EMJ, Reliance and RSAC entered into
the merger agreement, which is the legal document governing the
merger. Under the terms of the merger agreement, EMJ will merge
with and into RSAC, with RSAC continuing as the surviving
corporation. As part of the merger, RSACs name will be
changed to Earle M. Jorgensen Company and will remain a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Reliance. Upon completion of the
merger, EMJ common stock will be cancelled and will no longer be
publicly traded.
The merger agreement is attached to this proxy statement/
prospectus as Annex A. We strongly urge EMJ stockholders to
carefully read the merger agreement in its entirety. For a
summary of the merger agreement, please see the section entitled
The Merger Agreement beginning on page 75 of
this proxy statement/ prospectus.
On January 17, 2006, the Kelso Funds (as defined in this
summary under Fairness Opinions, Opinion of
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC to EMJs Board of
Directors beginning on page 9 of this proxy
statement/ prospectus), holders of 50.1% of EMJs
outstanding common stock, entered into a voting agreement, or
the voting agreement, with Reliance providing that they would
vote, subject to certain exceptions, all of the shares of EMJ
common stock owned by them in favor of the adoption and approval
of the merger agreement.
The voting agreement is attached to this proxy statement/
prospectus as Annex B. We strongly urge EMJ stockholders to
carefully read the voting agreement in its entirety. For a
summary of the voting agreement, please see the section entitled
The Voting Agreement beginning on page 90 of
this proxy statement/ prospectus.
What You Will Receive (page 75)
If we complete the merger, each EMJ stockholder will be entitled
to receive $6.50 in cash and a fraction of a share of Reliance
common stock that is to-be-determined for each outstanding share
of EMJ common stock. The value of the Reliance common stock
component will be approximately $6.50, but is subject to
adjustment based on the average closing price of Reliance common
stock on the New York Stock Exchange for the
20-day period ending
on, and including, the second trading day prior to the closing
6
of the merger, or the pricing period. If the average closing
price of Reliance common stock during the pricing period is:
|
|
|
|
|
more than $72.86, you will receive Reliance common stock with a
value that may be greater than $6.50 for each share of EMJ
common stock; |
|
|
|
equal to or less than $72.86 but equal to or more than $53.86,
you will receive Reliance common stock with a value of $6.50 for
each share of EMJ common stock; and |
|
|
|
less than $53.86, you will receive Reliance common stock with a
value that may be less than $6.50 for each share of EMJ common
stock. |
The number of shares of Reliance common stock you will receive
in the merger will equal the number, rounded down to the nearest
whole number, determined by multiplying the exchange ratio by
the number of shares of EMJ common stock you own.
You will not receive any fractional shares of Reliance common
stock in the merger. Instead, you will receive cash from
Reliance, without interest, for any fractional share of Reliance
common stock that you might otherwise have been entitled to
receive, based on the average closing price of Reliance common
stock for the pricing period.
The exchange ratio will not be determined until after the date
of the special meeting. Therefore, at the time of the special
meeting, you will not know the precise value of the merger
consideration you will receive when the merger is completed.
Reliance will adjust the number of shares of Reliance common
stock that you receive for each of your shares of EMJ common
stock based upon the average closing price of Reliance common
stock for the pricing period. If the average closing price of
Reliance common stock for the pricing period is:
|
|
|
|
|
more than $72.86, then you will receive 0.0892 shares of
Reliance common stock for each share of EMJ common stock that
you own; |
|
|
|
equal to or less than $72.86 but equal to or more than $53.86,
then you will receive a fraction of a share of Reliance common
stock equal to $6.50 divided by the average closing price of
Reliance common stock during the pricing period; and |
|
|
|
less than $53.86, then you will receive 0.1207 shares of
Reliance common stock for each share of EMJ common stock you own. |
Example 1: If you hold 100 shares of EMJ common stock
and the average closing price of Reliance common stock during
the pricing period is $75.00, you will receive $650 plus
8 shares of Reliance common stock (based on an exchange
ratio equal to 0.0892). In addition, you will receive a cash
payment of $69.00 in lieu of the 0.92 shares of Reliance
common stock that you would have otherwise received.
Example 2: If you hold 100 shares of EMJ common stock
and the average closing price of Reliance common stock during
the pricing period is $68.00, you will receive $650 plus
9 shares of Reliance common stock (based on an exchange
ratio equal to $6.50/$68.00). In addition, you will receive a
cash payment of $38.01 in lieu of the 0.559 shares of
Reliance common stock that you would have otherwise received.
Example 3: If you hold 100 shares of EMJ common stock
and the average closing price of Reliance common stock during
the pricing period is $40.00, you will receive $650 plus
12 shares of Reliance common stock (based on an exchange
ratio equal to 0.1207). In addition, you will receive a cash
payment of $2.80 in lieu of the 0.07 shares of Reliance
common stock that you would have otherwise received.
We expect the market price of Reliance common stock to fluctuate
prior to the merger. Therefore, the average closing price of
Reliance common stock for the pricing period may be higher or
lower than the closing price of Reliance common stock on the
date of the merger agreement and the date of the special
meeting. In addition, because the exchange ratio is fixed at the
end of the second trading day before the closing of the merger,
the value of the Reliance common stock that you will receive in
the merger may
7
increase or decrease before the date we complete the merger. You
should obtain current stock price quotations for Reliance common
stock prior to voting on the merger.
Depending on the exchange ratio, and based upon
50,237,094 shares of EMJ common stock outstanding as of
January 17, 2006, Reliance will issue a minimum of
4,481,148 and a maximum of 6,063,617 shares of common
stock. Therefore immediately after completion of the merger, EMJ
stockholders will hold a minimum of approximately 11.9% and a
maximum of approximately 15.5% of Reliances then
outstanding common stock.
Each option to purchase shares of EMJ common stock that was
granted pursuant to the Earle M. Jorgensen Holding Company, Inc.
Option Plan, or Holding option plan, which was assumed by EMJ in
April 2005, will be converted into the right to receive an
amount, if any, equal to (1) the difference between
(a) $13.00 and (b) the applicable per share exercise
price, multiplied by (2) the number of shares of EMJ common
stock subject to such stock option, subject to any applicable
withholding of taxes.
Each option to purchase shares of EMJ common stock that was
granted pursuant to the Earle M. Jorgensen Company 2004 Stock
Incentive Plan, or EMJ incentive plan, will be converted into an
option to purchase Reliance common stock and will continue to be
governed by the terms of the EMJ incentive plan and related
grant agreements under which they were granted, except that:
|
|
|
|
|
the number of shares of Reliance common stock subject to a new
Reliance stock option will be equal to the product of the number
of shares of EMJ common stock subject to the EMJ stock option
and the option exchange ratio, rounded down to the nearest whole
share; and |
|
|
|
the exercise price per share of Reliance common stock subject to
the new Reliance stock option will be equal to the exercise
price per share of EMJ common stock under the EMJ stock option
divided by the option exchange ratio, rounded up to the nearest
cent. |
The option exchange ratio will be the product of the exchange
ratio used to determine the fraction of a share of Reliance
common stock to be issued for each share of EMJ common stock in
the merger multiplied by two to account for the fact that cash
consideration will not be paid for these options.
Recommendation of EMJs Board of Directors
(page 52)
After careful consideration, EMJs board of directors
determined that the merger agreement and the merger are
advisable and in the best interests of EMJ and its stockholders
and unanimously approved the merger agreement. Accordingly,
EMJs board of directors unanimously recommends that
stockholders vote FOR the adoption and
approval of the merger agreement at the special meeting.
EMJs Reasons for the Merger (page 50)
EMJs board of directors believes that this merger will
create an industry leader in the distribution of flat-rolled,
tubular and bar products and carbon steel, stainless steel and
aluminum products. EMJs board of directors based its
decision to approve the merger agreement on many factors
including:
|
|
|
|
|
the premium offered for the shares of EMJ common stock; |
|
|
|
its belief that the merger was more favorable to stockholders
than any other alternative reasonably available to EMJ and its
stockholders; |
|
|
|
its belief that Reliance would be able to complete the
transaction and successfully integrate the EMJ operations; |
|
|
|
its belief that the market price of the EMJ common stock was not
likely to rise to the level of the purchase price in the near
future if EMJ continued as an independent company; |
8
|
|
|
|
|
the financial and other terms and conditions of the merger
agreement; |
|
|
|
the fact that the transaction will be immediately accretive to
the earnings of Reliance and the stockholders of EMJ will be
able to participate in the potential benefits of the transaction
to the Reliance common stock; |
|
|
|
the market position of the combined company; |
|
|
|
the financial presentation and opinion of Credit Suisse
Securities (USA) LLC, or Credit Suisse; and |
|
|
|
the financial presentation and opinion of Duff & Phelps
Securities, LLC, or Duff & Phelps. |
For a summary of the factors considered by EMJs board of
directors in making its decision to approve the merger agreement
and recommend its adoption and approval to the EMJ stockholders,
please see the section entitled The Merger
EMJs Reasons for the Merger and The
Merger Recommendation of EMJs Board of
Directors beginning on page 52 of this proxy
statement/prospectus.
Fairness Opinions
|
|
|
Opinion of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC to
EMJs Board of Directors (page 52) |
In connection with the merger, Credit Suisse delivered a written
opinion to EMJs board of directors that the merger
consideration to be received by the holders of EMJ common stock
(other than Reliance and its subsidiaries, and Kelso Investment
Associates, L.P., or KIA I, Kelso Equity
Partners II, L.P., or KEP II,
KIA III-Earle M. Jorgensen, L.P., or KIA III-EMJ,
and Kelso Investment Associates IV, L.P., or KIA IV,
collectively referred to as the Kelso Funds, and their
respective affiliates) in the merger is fair, from a financial
point of view, to such holders. The full text of Credit
Suisses written opinion, dated January 17, 2006, is
attached to this proxy statement/ prospectus as Annex C. We
encourage you to read this opinion carefully and in its entirety
for a description of the procedures followed, assumptions made,
matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken.
Credit Suisses opinion was provided to EMJs board
of directors in connection with its evaluation of the merger
consideration, does not address any other aspect of the merger
and does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder as
to how such stockholder should vote or act with respect to any
matters relating to the merger.
|
|
|
Opinion of Duff & Phelps Securities, LLC to
EMJs Board of Directors (page 57) |
In connection with the merger, Duff & Phelps delivered
a written opinion to EMJs board of directors that the
consideration to be received by the holders of EMJ common stock
(other than Reliance and its subsidiaries, and the Kelso Funds
and their respective affiliates) in the merger is fair, from a
financial point of view, to such holders. The full text of
Duff & Phelps written opinion, dated
January 17, 2006, is attached to this proxy
statement/prospectus as Annex D. We encourage you to read
this opinion carefully and in its entirety for a description of
the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered
and limitations on the review undertaken. Duff &
Phelps opinion was provided to EMJs board of
directors in connection with its evaluation of the merger
consideration, does not address any other aspect of the merger
and does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder as
to how such stockholder should vote or act with respect to any
matters relating to the merger.
9
The EMJ Special Meeting (page 41)
The special meeting will be held
on ,
2006,
at : a.m.,
local time, at ,California.
You will be asked to consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt
the merger agreement.
If you own shares of EMJ common stock at the close of business
on ,
2006, referred to as the record date, you will be entitled to
vote at the special meeting. You have one vote for each share of
EMJ common stock owned on the record date. As
of ,
2006, there
were stockholders
of record of EMJ common stock, as shown on the records of
EMJs transfer agent.
Adoption and approval of the merger agreement requires the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of
EMJ common stock outstanding on the record date. As a condition
to the signing of the merger agreement, Reliance required the
Kelso Funds, which collectively own approximately 50.1% of the
EMJ common stock outstanding, to enter into a voting agreement
to vote all of their shares in favor of adoption and approval of
the merger agreement. Therefore, unless the voting agreement is
terminated in accordance with its terms, the merger agreement
will be adopted and approved at the special meeting regardless
of the votes of any other stockholders.
|
|
|
Interests of EMJs Directors and Executive Officers
(page 68) |
In considering EMJs board of directors
recommendation, EMJ stockholders should be aware that some
officers, directors, and other key employees of EMJ have
interests in the merger that are different from, or in addition
to, those of EMJ stockholders generally, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to an existing retention agreement between EMJ and
Maurice S. Nelson, Jr., the chief executive officer and a
director of EMJ, Mr. Nelson is entitled to a bonus of
$3 million if his employment with EMJ is terminated for
good reason, which includes ongoing diminution in his title,
duties or responsibilities or a material reduction in his base
salary or benefits. Mr. Nelsons employment as chief
executive officer will terminate for good reason (as defined in
his retention agreement) upon completion of the merger and he
will become entitled to payment of the bonus of $3 million
six months after completion of the merger. |
|
|
|
On January 17, 2006, William S. Johnson, the vice
president, chief financial officer and secretary of EMJ, entered
into a retention agreement with EMJ that provides for employment
and severance benefits and has a term of three years, unless
terminated earlier pursuant to its terms.
Mr. Johnsons retention agreement provides generally
that his terms and conditions of employment (including position,
responsibility, location, compensation and benefits) will not be
adversely changed during the term of the agreement and provides
for certain minimum guaranteed compensation levels (including
base salary, annual bonus, long-term incentives and
participation in benefit plans) during such term. If he remains
employed by EMJ, Mr. Johnson will receive bonuses of
approximately $425,000 and $200,000 at the six-month and
twelve-month anniversaries of the effective date of the merger,
respectively. |
|
|
|
On January 17, 2006, EMJs board of directors approved
a special bonus plan for senior management providing that,
immediately prior to the closing of the merger, EMJ will pay a
taxable bonus to certain members of EMJs senior management
in connection with the completion of the merger in an aggregate
amount not to exceed $5 million, which bonus will be
allocated to such members of EMJs senior management as
determined by EMJs board of directors. |
10
|
|
|
|
|
The Kelso Funds and their affiliates, including Mr. Nickell
and Mr. Wahrhaftig who are directors of EMJ, hold
25,205,133 shares of EMJs common stock, of those
shares, 25,174,634 shares are held by the Kelso Funds
representing 50.1% of the issued and outstanding shares of
EMJs common stock. The Kelso Funds have entered into the
voting agreement with Reliance pursuant to which they have
agreed to vote the shares of EMJ common stock held by them in
favor of the adoption and approval of the merger agreement. Upon
completion of the merger, the Kelso Funds and their affiliates
will receive aggregate merger consideration consisting of
approximately $163.8 million in cash and
2,340,142 shares of Reliance common stock (assuming the
average closing price of the Reliance common stock for the
pricing period is equal to $70.01, which would be the average
closing price for the pricing period if the pricing period ended
on January 31, 2006). |
|
|
|
Reliance entered into a registration rights agreement, dated as
of January 17, 2006, or the registration rights agreement,
with the Kelso Funds pursuant to which Reliance will prepare and
file, within ten days of the closing of the merger, a
registration statement under the Securities Act at
Reliances expense, covering all or a portion of the Kelso
Funds shares. Pursuant to the registration rights
agreement, Reliance also will provide the Kelso Funds with
certain demand and piggyback registration rights with respect to
the shares of Reliance common stock received by the Kelso Funds
in the merger. |
|
|
|
EMJs executive officers participate in EMJs
retirement savings plan and EMJs executive officers and
some of EMJs directors participate in EMJs equity
plans under which stock options have been granted. Upon
completion of the merger, executive officers and certain
directors of EMJ will receive the same merger consideration as
the other stockholders of EMJ for their EMJ common stock, they
will receive options to purchase Reliance common stock for their
EMJ stock options under the EMJ stock incentive plan and cash in
exchange for their options outstanding under the Holding option
plan. They will receive cash for their Holding options as
follows: Mr. Nelson will receive approximately
$16.8 million, Mr. Roderick will receive approximately
$1.7 million, each of Messrs. Rutledge and Marquard
will receive approximately $678,000, each of
Messrs. McCaffery, Travetto, Henry and Hoffman will receive
approximately $1.58 million and Mr. Johnson will
receive approximately $1.13 million. |
|
|
|
EMJs executive officers and directors will be entitled to
continued indemnification and certain liability insurance
coverage under the merger agreement. |
Transaction-Related Costs and Financing Arrangements
(page 72)
Upon completion of the merger, Reliance will pay cash
consideration of approximately $356 million to EMJ
stockholders and option holders, issue between approximately
4.5 million and 6.1 million shares of its common stock
and assume approximately $299 million of EMJs debt
(based on EMJs outstanding indebtedness as of
September 28, 2005).
Reliance intends to finance the cash portion of the
consideration to be paid to EMJ stockholders and option holders
in the merger, as well as expenses of the transaction, through a
combination of cash on hand, if any, and by drawing on its
existing revolving credit facility. Reliance has obtained all
necessary consents or waivers required by its lenders to
complete the merger. Availability of financing is not a
condition precedent to Reliances obligation to effect the
merger.
Conditions to Closing (page 85)
The completion of the merger depends on the satisfaction or
waiver of a number of conditions, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
adoption and approval of the merger agreement by holders of a
majority of the outstanding shares of EMJ common stock; |
|
|
|
expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period (or
any extension) under the Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, or the HSR Act, and
related rules; |
11
|
|
|
|
|
the receipt of all other governmental agency consents,
approvals, permits, orders and authorizations required to
complete the merger other than those which if not made or
obtained would not render the merger illegal; |
|
|
|
the absence of any legal prohibitions against the merger; |
|
|
|
the approval for listing on the New York Stock Exchange of the
shares of Reliance common stock to be issued pursuant to the
merger agreement; |
|
|
|
EMJs and Reliances representations and warranties
being true and correct as of the date of the completion of the
merger, except where the failure of such representations and
warranties to be true and correct, individually or in the
aggregate, has not had and would not have a material adverse
effect; |
|
|
|
the performance by each of EMJ and Reliance of its agreements,
covenants and obligations under the merger agreement, in all
material respects; and |
|
|
|
the absence of a material adverse effect on EMJ or Reliance. |
Termination of the Merger Agreement (page 82)
EMJ, Reliance and RSAC may mutually agree in writing to
terminate the merger agreement at any time before completing the
merger, even after EMJs stockholders have adopted it. The
merger agreement may also be terminated at any time prior to the
effective time of the merger under specified circumstances,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
by either EMJ or Reliance, if the merger is not completed by
June 2, 2006, unless the failure is the result of a willful
and material breach of the merger agreement by the party seeking
to terminate the merger agreement; |
|
|
|
by either EMJ or Reliance, if any governmental entity issues a
final order preventing the merger; |
|
|
|
by either EMJ or Reliance, if EMJ stockholders fail to adopt the
merger agreement at the special meeting; |
|
|
|
by either EMJ or Reliance, if the other party to the merger
agreement has breached or failed to perform in any material
respect any of its representations, warranties or covenants, the
breach would give rise to a failure of a condition to the
terminating partys obligation to close, and the breach
cannot be or has not been cured within 30 days of written
notice of such breach to the non-breaching party; |
|
|
|
by Reliance, if EMJs board of directors has
(1) withdrawn or adversely modified its recommendation of
the merger agreement or the merger or (2) recommended to
EMJ stockholders any takeover proposal (as described in the
section entitled The Merger Agreement No
Solicitation beginning on page 80 of this proxy
statement/ prospectus) other than the merger; or |
|
|
|
by EMJ or Reliance, if EMJ has determined to accept a superior
proposal (as described in the section entitled The Merger
Agreement No Solicitation beginning on
page 80 of this proxy statement/ prospectus). |
Termination Fees to Be Paid by EMJ (page 83)
EMJ has agreed to pay Reliance a termination fee of
approximately $20.5 million if Reliance terminates the
merger agreement as the result of:
|
|
|
|
|
EMJs board of directors (1) withdrawing or adversely
modifying its recommendation to EMJ stockholders to adopt the
merger agreement and the merger or (2) recommending a
takeover proposal other than the merger; or |
|
|
|
EMJs board of directors accepting a superior proposal. |
12
EMJ Prohibited From Soliciting Other Offers (page 80)
Except in connection with the exercise by EMJs board of
directors of its fiduciary duties, the merger agreement provides
that EMJ will not, and will not permit its directors, officers,
employees or other representatives and agents to:
|
|
|
|
|
solicit, initiate, negotiate, knowingly encourage or knowingly
facilitate the submission of any takeover proposal; |
|
|
|
enter into any agreement with respect to any takeover
proposal; or |
|
|
|
participate in any discussions or negotiations regarding, or
furnish to any person any information with respect to, or take
any other action to facilitate any inquiries or the making of
any proposal that constitutes, or may reasonably be expected to
lead to, any takeover proposal. |
Any violation of these solicitation restrictions may result in
Reliance having the ability to terminate the merger agreement
and receive termination fees as described below. However, prior
to the special meeting, if EMJ receives an unsolicited bona fide
written takeover proposal by a third party that EMJs board
of directors determines in good faith, after receiving advice of
its outside legal counsel and financial advisor, to be or to
reasonably be expected to lead to a superior proposal, EMJ is
permitted, subject to additional limitations, to furnish
information about its business to the third party, engage in
discussions and negotiations with the third party and take and
disclose to EMJs stockholders a position with respect to
the takeover proposal.
Restrictions on Sale of Shares by Affiliates of EMJ and
Reliance (page 73)
All shares of Reliance common stock that you receive in
connection with the merger will be freely transferable unless
you are considered an affiliate of either EMJ or
Reliance for the purposes of the Securities Act at the time the
merger agreement is submitted to EMJ stockholders for adoption
and approval, in which case you will be permitted to sell the
shares of Reliance common stock that you receive in the merger
only pursuant to an effective registration statement or an
exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities
Act. This proxy statement/ prospectus does not register the
resale of stock held by affiliates, and the merger agreement
does not obligate Reliance to file a registration statement for
this purpose.
Reliance entered into the registration rights agreement with the
Kelso Funds pursuant to which Reliance will, within ten days of
the closing of the merger, prepare and file a registration
statement under the Securities Act at Reliances expense,
covering all or a portion of the shares of Reliance common stock
that the Kelso Funds receive in the merger. Pursuant to the
registration rights agreement, Reliance will also provide the
Kelso Funds with certain demand and piggyback registration
rights with respect to the shares of Reliance common stock
received by the Kelso Funds in the merger.
Regulatory Matters Relating to the Merger (page 72)
Under the HSR Act, the merger cannot be completed until the
expiration or earlier termination of a waiting period that
follows the filing of notification forms by both parties to the
merger with the Federal Trade Commission and the Antitrust
Division of the Department of Justice. Reliance and EMJ
submitted their respective notification and report forms on
January 20, 2006. The waiting period will expire on
February 21, 2006, unless terminated early or additional
information is requested. Reliance and EMJ expect that the
requirements of the HSR Act may be satisfied so that the merger
can be completed as early as the second quarter of 2006.
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
(page 87)
In order for the merger to occur, Reliance must receive an
opinion from Lord, Bissell & Brook LLP, tax counsel to
Reliance, and EMJ must receive an opinion from Katten Muchin
Rosenman LLP, tax counsel to EMJ, to the effect that, based upon
current law and certain other customary assumptions, the
13
merger will qualify as a tax-deferred reorganization
within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code. If the merger
qualifies as a tax-deferred reorganization, for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, (1) EMJ generally
will not recognize gain or loss as a result of the merger and
(2) EMJ stockholders generally will not recognize gain or
loss as a result of the merger except to the extent of
(a) cash received by them in exchange for their shares of
EMJ common stock and (b) cash received by them in lieu of
fractional Reliance common shares. You may, however, recognize a
taxable gain or loss when you dispose of any Reliance common
shares that you receive as a result of the merger. The tax
opinions of Lord, Bissell & Brook LLP, and Katten
Muchin Rosenman LLP are subject to certain assumptions and
qualifications, including but not limited to the accuracy of
certain factual representations made by Reliance and EMJ. These
tax opinions are not binding on the Internal Revenue Service, or
the IRS, or any court and do not preclude the IRS or any court
from adopting a contrary position. The federal income tax
consequences described in this proxy statement/ prospectus may
not apply to all EMJ stockholders. Your tax consequences will
depend on your own situation. You are urged to consult your
tax advisor so as to fully understand the tax consequences of
the merger to you.
Accounting Treatment (page 73)
The merger will be accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting in accordance with United States generally
accepted accounting principles.
Appraisal Rights for EMJ Stockholders (page 114)
Under Delaware law, if you do not vote for adoption of the
merger agreement and you comply with other statutory
requirements of the Delaware General Corporation Law, you may
elect to receive, in cash, the judicially determined fair value
of your shares of stock in lieu of the merger consideration
provided for under the merger agreement.
Merely voting against the merger will not protect your rights to
an appraisal, which requires completion of all the steps
provided under Delaware law. The requirements under Delaware law
for exercising appraisal rights are described in the section
entitled Appraisal Rights for EMJ Stockholders
beginning on page 114 of this proxy statement/ prospectus.
The relevant section of Delaware law regarding appraisal rights
is reproduced and attached as Annex E to this proxy
statement/ prospectus.
If you vote for the adoption and approval of the merger
agreement, you will waive your rights to seek appraisal of your
shares of EMJ common stock under Delaware law.
Comparative Market Prices and Dividends (page 25)
Both Reliance and EMJ common stock trade on the New York Stock
Exchange. Reliance is listed under the trading symbol
RS and EMJ is listed under the trading symbol
JOR. On January 17, 2006, the last trading day
before the public announcement of the signing of the merger
agreement, Reliance common stock closed at $65.75 per share
and EMJ common stock closed at $10.43 per share.
On February 3, 2006, the most recent practicable date prior to
the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus, Reliance common
stock closed at $81.57 per share and EMJ common stock
closed at $13.94 per share.
Surrender of EMJ Stock Certificates (page 77)
Following the effective time of the merger, a letter of
transmittal will be mailed by the exchange/paying agent to all
holders of EMJ common stock containing instructions for
surrendering their certificates. Certificates should not be
surrendered until the letter of transmittal is received, fully
completed, and returned as instructed in the letter of
transmittal.
14
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA OF
RELIANCE
The selected consolidated historical financial and other data
for Reliance set forth below as of and for the five years ended
December 31, 2004 are derived from Reliances
consolidated financial statements, which have been audited by
Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public
accounting firm. The selected consolidated historical financial
and other data set forth below as of and for the nine months
ended September 30, 2004 and September 30, 2005 are
derived from Reliances unaudited consolidated financial
statements. The results of operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the
results of operations for the full year or any other interim
period. Reliance management prepared the unaudited information
on the same basis as it prepared Reliances audited
consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of Reliance
management, this information reflects all adjustments,
consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a
fair presentation of this data for those dates. The consolidated
financial statements were prepared in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles.
When you read this selected historical financial data, it is
important that you read it in conjunction with, and it is
qualified by reference to, the historical financial statements
and related notes and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations in Reliances annual report on
Form 10-K for 2004
and September 30, 2005 quarterly report on
Form 10-Q filed
with the SEC and incorporated by reference in this proxy
statement/ prospectus. See the section entitled Where You
Can Find More Information on page 117.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
9/30/05 | |
|
9/30/04 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) | |
Income Statement
Data:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
2,943,034 |
|
|
$ |
1,882,933 |
|
|
$ |
1,745,005 |
|
|
$ |
1,656,974 |
|
|
$ |
1,726,665 |
|
|
$ |
2,498,373 |
|
|
$ |
2,200,215 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
2,110,848 |
|
|
|
1,372,310 |
|
|
|
1,268,251 |
|
|
|
1,194,512 |
|
|
|
1,256,997 |
|
|
|
1,831,474 |
|
|
|
1,569,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
832,186 |
|
|
|
510,623 |
|
|
|
476,754 |
|
|
|
462,462 |
|
|
|
469,668 |
|
|
|
666,899 |
|
|
|
630,819 |
|
Operating
expenses(2)
|
|
|
525,306 |
|
|
|
430,493 |
|
|
|
406,479 |
|
|
|
371,006 |
|
|
|
339,319 |
|
|
|
407,039 |
|
|
|
391,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
306,880 |
|
|
|
80,130 |
|
|
|
70,275 |
|
|
|
91,456 |
|
|
|
130,349 |
|
|
|
259,860 |
|
|
|
239,810 |
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(28,690 |
) |
|
|
(26,745 |
) |
|
|
(22,605 |
) |
|
|
(26,738 |
) |
|
|
(26,068 |
) |
|
|
(19,290 |
) |
|
|
(21,816 |
) |
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
4,168 |
|
|
|
2,837 |
|
|
|
3,266 |
|
|
|
3,796 |
|
|
|
3,410 |
|
|
|
2,709 |
|
|
|
2,376 |
|
|
Amortization
expense(3)
|
|
|
(3,208 |
) |
|
|
(2,304 |
) |
|
|
(1,355 |
) |
|
|
(8,641 |
) |
|
|
(7,411 |
) |
|
|
(3,380 |
) |
|
|
(2,413 |
) |
Equity earnings of 50%-owned company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
2,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(9,182 |
) |
|
|
938 |
|
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,271 |
) |
|
|
(8,898 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
269,968 |
|
|
|
54,856 |
|
|
|
49,720 |
|
|
|
60,159 |
|
|
|
102,587 |
|
|
|
233,628 |
|
|
|
209,059 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(100,240 |
) |
|
|
(20,846 |
) |
|
|
(19,553 |
) |
|
|
(23,823 |
) |
|
|
(40,268 |
) |
|
|
(88,779 |
) |
|
|
(82,283 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
169,728 |
|
|
$ |
34,010 |
|
|
$ |
30,167 |
|
|
$ |
36,336 |
|
|
$ |
62,319 |
|
|
$ |
144,849 |
|
|
$ |
126,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations diluted
|
|
$ |
5.19 |
|
|
$ |
1.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
$ |
1.28 |
|
|
$ |
2.28 |
|
|
$ |
4.38 |
|
|
$ |
3.88 |
|
Income from continuing operations basic
|
|
$ |
5.23 |
|
|
$ |
1.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
$ |
1.28 |
|
|
$ |
2.29 |
|
|
$ |
4.40 |
|
|
$ |
3.91 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
32,675 |
|
|
|
31,866 |
|
|
|
31,799 |
|
|
|
28,470 |
|
|
|
27,289 |
|
|
|
33,063 |
|
|
|
32,641 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
32,480 |
|
|
|
31,853 |
|
|
|
31,687 |
|
|
|
28,336 |
|
|
|
27,215 |
|
|
|
32,889 |
|
|
|
32,429 |
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
9/30/05 | |
|
9/30/04 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) | |
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(4)
|
|
$ |
343,285 |
|
|
$ |
118,471 |
|
|
$ |
100,871 |
|
|
$ |
119,234 |
|
|
$ |
156,747 |
|
|
$ |
287,724 |
|
|
$ |
264,021 |
|
Cash flow from operations
|
|
|
121,768 |
|
|
|
107,820 |
|
|
|
90,638 |
|
|
|
104,038 |
|
|
|
25,803 |
|
|
|
165,168 |
|
|
|
31,170 |
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
35,982 |
|
|
|
20,909 |
|
|
|
18,658 |
|
|
|
24,539 |
|
|
|
30,379 |
|
|
|
34,314 |
|
|
|
27,695 |
|
Cash dividends per share
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
0.24 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, | |
|
As of September 30, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$ |
444,449 |
|
|
$ |
341,762 |
|
|
$ |
390,201 |
|
|
$ |
379,669 |
|
|
$ |
347,659 |
|
|
$ |
510,454 |
|
|
$ |
478,849 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,563,331 |
|
|
|
1,369,424 |
|
|
|
1,139,758 |
|
|
|
1,082,502 |
|
|
|
997,243 |
|
|
|
1,728,216 |
|
|
|
1,604,600 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
380,850 |
|
|
|
469,250 |
|
|
|
344,080 |
|
|
|
331,975 |
|
|
|
421,825 |
|
|
|
370,817 |
|
|
|
478,850 |
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
822,552 |
|
|
|
647,619 |
|
|
|
610,435 |
|
|
|
583,561 |
|
|
|
403,039 |
|
|
|
967,501 |
|
|
|
777,882 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Does not include financial results of American Steel, L.L.C. for
the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001 and the period
January 1, 2002 to April 30, 2002 because Reliance
accounted for its 50% investment by the equity method, and
therefore Reliance excluded 50% of American Steels
earnings from its net income and earnings per share amounts.
Effective May 1, 2002, Reliance began consolidating
American Steels financial results due to an amendment to
American Steels operating agreement, which gave Reliance
50.5% of the ownership units and eliminated all super- majority
and unanimous voting rights, among other changes. |
|
(2) |
Operating expenses include warehouse, delivery, selling, general
and administrative expenses and depreciation expense. |
|
(3) |
Amortization expense included the amortization expense related
to goodwill in the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001. |
|
(4) |
EBITDA is defined as the sum of income before interest expense,
income taxes, depreciation expense and amortization of
intangibles (including goodwill). We believe that EBITDA is
commonly used as a measure of performance for companies in our
industry and is frequently used by analysts, investors, lenders
and other interested parties to evaluate a companys
financial performance and its ability to incur and service debt
while providing useful information. EBITDA should not be
considered in isolation or as a substitute for consolidated
statements of income and cash flows data prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States and should not be construed as an indication of a
companys operating performance or as a measure of
liquidity. EBITDA as measured in this proxy statement/
prospectus is not necessarily comparable with similarly titled
measures for other companies. |
EBITDA Reconciliation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
9/30/05 | |
|
9/30/04 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Income before income taxes
|
|
$ |
269,968 |
|
|
$ |
54,856 |
|
|
$ |
49,720 |
|
|
$ |
60,159 |
|
|
$ |
102,587 |
|
|
$ |
233,628 |
|
|
$ |
209,059 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
28,690 |
|
|
|
26,745 |
|
|
|
22,605 |
|
|
|
26,738 |
|
|
|
26,068 |
|
|
|
19,290 |
|
|
|
21,816 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
44,627 |
|
|
|
36,870 |
|
|
|
28,546 |
|
|
|
32,337 |
|
|
|
28,092 |
|
|
|
34,806 |
|
|
|
33,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
343,285 |
|
|
$ |
118,471 |
|
|
$ |
100,871 |
|
|
$ |
119,234 |
|
|
$ |
156,747 |
|
|
$ |
287,724 |
|
|
$ |
264,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA OF
EMJ
The selected consolidated historical financial and other data
for EMJ set forth below as of and for the five years ended
March 31, 2005 are derived from EMJs consolidated
financial statements which have been audited by Ernst &
Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm. The
selected consolidated historical financial and other data set
forth below as of and for the six months ended
September 29, 2004 and September 28, 2005 are derived
from EMJs unaudited consolidated financial statements. The
results of operations for the six months ended
September 28, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the
results of operations for the full year or any other interim
period. EMJ management prepared the unaudited information on the
same basis as it prepared EMJs audited consolidated
financial statements. In the opinion of EMJ management, this
information reflects all adjustments, consisting of only normal
recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of this
data for those dates. The consolidated financial statements were
prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
When you read this selected historical financial data, it is
important that you read it in conjunction with, and it is
qualified by reference to, the historical financial statements
and related notes and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations in EMJs annual report on
Form 10-K for 2005
and September 28, 2005 quarterly report on
Form 10-Q filed
with the SEC, and incorporated by reference in this proxy
statement/ prospectus. See the section entitled Where You
Can Find More Information on page 117.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, | |
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
9/28/05 | |
|
9/29/04 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) | |
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
1,608,890 |
|
|
$ |
1,040,367 |
|
|
$ |
919,927 |
|
|
$ |
895,058 |
|
|
$ |
1,059,681 |
|
|
$ |
856,888 |
|
|
$ |
750,907 |
|
Costs of goods sold
|
|
|
1,184,871 |
|
|
|
754,266 |
|
|
|
658,562 |
|
|
|
641,991 |
|
|
|
767,263 |
|
|
|
637,356 |
|
|
|
534,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
424,019 |
|
|
|
286,101 |
|
|
|
261,365 |
|
|
|
253,067 |
|
|
|
292,418 |
|
|
|
219,532 |
|
|
|
216,104 |
|
Expenses(1)
|
|
|
289,318 |
|
|
|
216,609 |
|
|
|
210,250 |
|
|
|
204,684 |
|
|
|
228,498 |
|
|
|
130,967 |
|
|
|
128,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
134,701 |
|
|
|
69,492 |
|
|
|
51,115 |
|
|
|
48,383 |
|
|
|
63,920 |
|
|
|
88,565 |
|
|
|
87,359 |
|
Net interest
expense(2)
|
|
|
75,760 |
|
|
|
89,927 |
|
|
|
82,486 |
|
|
|
72,433 |
|
|
|
69,951 |
|
|
|
27,488 |
|
|
|
47,874 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
(3)
|
|
|
(38,562 |
) |
|
|
3,127 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
|
19,617 |
|
|
|
5,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income(loss)
|
|
$ |
97,503 |
|
|
$ |
(23,562 |
) |
|
$ |
(32,871 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,505 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,254 |
) |
|
$ |
41,460 |
|
|
$ |
33,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income(loss) available to common
stockholders(3)(4)
|
|
$ |
91,993 |
|
|
$ |
(34,190 |
) |
|
$ |
(42,601 |
) |
|
$ |
(34,402 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,438 |
) |
|
$ |
41,460 |
|
|
$ |
28,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders per share
(3)(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
7.64 |
|
|
$ |
(2.96 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.60 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.78 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.23 |
) |
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
$ |
2.46 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
5.73 |
|
|
$ |
(2.96 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.60 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.78 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.23 |
) |
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
$ |
1.81 |
|
Weighted average shares
outstanding(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
12,039 |
|
|
|
11,555 |
|
|
|
11,820 |
|
|
|
12,365 |
|
|
|
12,548 |
|
|
|
47,990 |
|
|
|
11,404 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
16,042 |
|
|
|
11,555 |
|
|
|
11,820 |
|
|
|
12,365 |
|
|
|
12,548 |
|
|
|
49,770 |
|
|
|
15,466 |
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, | |
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
9/28/05 | |
|
9/29/04 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share and tonnage data) | |
Pro forma information (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income available to common
stockholders(6)
|
|
$ |
81,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income available to common stockholders per
share(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
1.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
49,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
50,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$ |
22,975 |
|
|
$ |
10,530 |
|
|
$ |
15,335 |
|
|
$ |
24,531 |
|
|
$ |
14,475 |
|
|
$ |
11,594 |
|
|
$ |
14,668 |
|
Purchase of stock, net
|
|
|
13,158 |
|
|
|
5,781 |
|
|
|
10,587 |
|
|
|
14,963 |
|
|
|
5,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
Other Data (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(8)
|
|
$ |
146,422 |
|
|
$ |
80,776 |
|
|
$ |
62,484 |
|
|
$ |
59,832 |
|
|
$ |
74,955 |
|
|
$ |
93,907 |
|
|
$ |
93,096 |
|
COLI
effect(9)
|
|
|
(861 |
) |
|
|
(561 |
) |
|
|
(1,752 |
) |
|
|
(1,738 |
) |
|
|
(2,374 |
) |
|
|
(1,796 |
) |
|
|
(2,303 |
) |
Revenues per
employee(10)
|
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
EBITDA per
employee(8)(10)
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
Average number of employees
|
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
1,628 |
|
|
|
1,706 |
|
|
|
1,805 |
|
|
|
2,051 |
|
|
|
1,720 |
|
|
|
1,650 |
|
Tons shipped
|
|
|
769,879 |
|
|
|
662,213 |
|
|
|
603,310 |
|
|
|
581,243 |
|
|
|
679,610 |
|
|
|
391,163 |
|
|
|
386,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
September 28, | |
|
September 29, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
19,994 |
|
|
$ |
15,646 |
|
|
$ |
45,413 |
|
|
$ |
21,372 |
|
|
$ |
23,779 |
|
|
$ |
8,668 |
|
|
$ |
11,592 |
|
Total working capital
|
|
|
185,759 |
|
|
|
129,252 |
|
|
|
165,897 |
|
|
|
146,800 |
|
|
|
149,501 |
|
|
|
252,742 |
|
|
|
203,257 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
658,841 |
|
|
|
537,191 |
|
|
|
516,580 |
|
|
|
444,506 |
|
|
|
484,625 |
|
|
|
667,827 |
|
|
|
661,886 |
|
Total
debt(11)
|
|
|
516,889 |
|
|
|
535,111 |
|
|
|
543,077 |
|
|
|
471,376 |
|
|
|
420,064 |
|
|
|
298,738 |
|
|
|
595,307 |
|
Total stockholders equity (deficit)
|
|
|
(186,173 |
) |
|
|
(273,295 |
) |
|
|
(245,171 |
) |
|
|
(202,690 |
) |
|
|
(160,197 |
) |
|
|
125,303 |
|
|
|
(239,379 |
) |
|
|
(1) |
Expenses include restructuring charges aggregating $3,320 and
$1,861 for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2001 and 2002
in connection with workforce reductions and consolidations and
losses from the sale of significant assets in those fiscal years
and a special compensation charge of $2,000 in connection with a
payment to EMJs chief executive officer in fiscal 2001. |
|
(2) |
Net interest expense includes amortization and write-off of debt
issue costs aggregating $1,482, $1,792, $1,416, $1,323, $1,756,
$661 and $659 for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2001,
2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and the six months ended
September 29, 2004 and September 28, 2005,
respectively, net of interest income of $1,179, $164, $394,
$159, $40, $14 and $94 for the fiscal years ended March 31,
2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and the six months ended
September 29, 2004 and September 28, 2005,
respectively. |
18
|
|
(3) |
Income taxes for fiscal years 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004
primarily represent certain foreign and state taxes on income
due to the fact that a valuation allowance was established
against deferred tax assets. For fiscal year 2005 EMJ recognized
a tax benefit for the reduction of its valuation allowance for
deferred tax assets of $56,303. Income taxes for the first six
months of fiscal 2006 represent the federal, state and Canadian
income taxes. |
|
(4) |
The adjustments to net income (loss) are approximately $(8,184),
$(9,897), $(9,730), $(10,628), $(5,510), $(5,510) and $0 for
fiscal years 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and the six months
ended September 29, 2004 and September 28, 2005,
respectively. The adjustments consist of dividends accrued for
the Earle M. Jorgensen Holding Company, Inc., or Holding,
series A preferred stock and dividends declared and
paid-in-kind for the
Holding series B preferred stock. |
|
(5) |
The basic and diluted per share information is computed based on
the weighted average number of shares of common stock
outstanding for each reported period. The computation of diluted
per share information includes the dilutive effect of common
stock equivalents for outstanding options and warrants
exercisable for shares of common stock using the treasury stock
method. Upon completion of the merger and financial
restructuring in April 2005 all shares of Holding common stock
were converted to shares of EMJ common stock. The inclusion of
common stock equivalents for all periods presented prior to the
year ended March 31, 2005 was antidilutive. |
|
(6) |
The adjustments to pro forma net income available to common
stockholders include $(21,442) relating to the interest on the
Holding notes, $37,049 income tax benefit related to Holding and
$(5,510) dividends declared and
paid-in-kind for the
Holding series B preferred stock. |
|
|
|
Reconciliation of historical net income available to common
stockholders of EMJ to reported income (loss) available to
common stockholders after giving effect to the merger and
financial restructuring on April 20, 2005 is as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(in thousands) | |
Historical net income of EMJ
|
|
$ |
81,896 |
|
Adjustments for the effect of the merger and financial
restructuring:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on subordinated debt, net
|
|
|
(21,442 |
) |
|
Preferred dividends
|
|
|
(5,510 |
) |
|
Tax benefit
|
|
|
37,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reported net income (loss) available to common stockholders
after giving effect to the merger and financial restructuring
|
|
$ |
91,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7) |
The adjustments to pro forma basic per share information
reflects per share information as discussed in note 5,
above, and shares of EMJ common stock issued upon completion of
the merger and financial restructuring and initial public
offering as follows: 12,997,890 shares for the Holding
notes; 2,377,358 shares for the Holding series A
preferred stock; 1,409,751 shares for the Holding
series B preferred stock; 2,934,977 shares for the
Holding warrants; 12,038,898 weighted average shares for the
Holding common stock converted one to one in the merger and
financial restructuring to EMJ common stock; and
17,600,000 shares issued in the initial public offering.
The computation of pro forma diluted per share information
includes the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents for
outstanding options exercisable for shares of common stock. |
19
|
|
|
Change in shares from giving effect to the merger and financial
restructuring and the initial public offering: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, | |
|
|
except per | |
|
|
share data) | |
Holding common shares converted to EMJ common shares one-to-one
|
|
|
11,197 |
|
Exchange consideration for debt and equity securities
|
|
|
19,720 |
|
Initial public offering shares issued
|
|
|
17,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total shares outstanding at end of period if merger and
financial restructuring and initial public offering happened
during the period
|
|
|
48,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma earnings per share based on historical net income of
EMJ
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
1.62 |
|
Pro forma weighted outstanding shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
49,359 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
50,428 |
|
|
|
(8) |
EBITDA represents net income before net interest
expense, provision for income taxes and depreciation and
amortization. Consistent with Item 10(e) of
Regulation S-K
promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Act, EMJs EBITDA has not been adjusted to
exclude any other non-cash charges or liabilities, such as LIFO
(last-in-first-out)
adjustments of $887, $590, $(3,354), $14,343, $74,164, $24,405
and $7,772 and postretirement benefits aggregating $11, $249,
$498, $619, $822, $401 and $424 for the fiscal years ended
March 31, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and the six
months ended September 29, 2004 and September 28,
2005, respectively. In addition, EMJs EBITDA has not been
adjusted for the following items: provisions for workforce
reductions and consolidations and losses from the sale of
significant assets aggregating $3,320 and $1,861 for the fiscal
years ended March 31, 2001 and 2002, respectively; special
compensation of $2,000 payable to EMJs chief executive
officer in fiscal 2001; excise tax of $1,919 related to an IRS
settlement in fiscal 2002; and a loss of $12,278 related to
early retirement of debt in fiscal 2003. EMJ believes EBITDA is
useful to investors because it is frequently used by securities
analysts, investors and other interested parties in the
evaluation of company performance in the industry. EMJs
management believes that EBITDA is useful in evaluating
EMJs operating performance between periods and compared to
that of EMJs competitors because the calculation of EBITDA
generally eliminates the effects of financing and income taxes
and the accounting effects of capital spending and acquisitions,
which items may vary between periods and for different companies
for reasons unrelated to overall operating performance. As a
result, EMJs management uses EBITDA as a significant
component when measuring EMJs performance in connection
with determining incentive compensation. EBITDA is not a
recognized measure of operating income, financial performance or
liquidity under U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. The items excluded from EBITDA are significant
components in understanding and assessing financial performance.
Therefore, while providing useful information, EMJs EBITDA
should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for
consolidated statement of operations and cash flow data prepared
in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles and should not be construed as an indication of a
companys operating performance or as a measure of
liquidity. In addition, it should be noted that companies
calculate EBITDA differently and, therefore, EBITDA as presented
for EMJ may not be comparable to EBITDA reported by other
companies. A reconciliation of net income to EBITDA for each of
the respective periods indicated is as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, | |
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
9/28/05 | |
|
9/29/04 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Reconciliation of EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
97,503 |
|
|
$ |
(23,562 |
) |
|
$ |
(32,871 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,505 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,254 |
) |
|
$ |
41,460 |
|
|
$ |
33,555 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
11,721 |
|
|
|
11,284 |
|
|
|
11,369 |
|
|
|
11,449 |
|
|
|
11,035 |
|
|
|
5,342 |
|
|
|
5,737 |
|
Net interest expense
|
|
|
75,760 |
|
|
|
89,927 |
|
|
|
82,486 |
|
|
|
72,433 |
|
|
|
69,951 |
|
|
|
27,488 |
|
|
|
47,874 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(38,562 |
) |
|
|
3,127 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
|
19,617 |
|
|
|
5,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
146,422 |
|
|
$ |
80,776 |
|
|
$ |
62,484 |
|
|
$ |
59,832 |
|
|
$ |
74,955 |
|
|
$ |
93,907 |
|
|
$ |
93,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9) |
EMJ is the owner and beneficiary of life insurance policies, or
the COLI policies, on (1) all former non-union employees of
a predecessor company, including certain current employees of
EMJ, and (2) key man life |
20
|
|
|
insurance policies on certain
current and former executives of EMJ. The effect of these
company owned life insurance policies on EMJs pre-tax
income consists of premium expense, policy dividend growth, and
proceeds (death benefits) (which are reported as general and
administrative expense) and policy interest expense on policy
borrowings (which is reported as a component of interest
expense). Under current U.S. federal tax law, the policy
dividend growth is not currently taxable, the premium is
non-deductible, the proceeds (death benefits) are tax exempt and
the interest is deductible up to 96% of the contract rate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended March 31, | |
|
Six Months Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
9/28/05 | |
|
9/29/04 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Calculation of COLI effect:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash surrender value-policy dividend growth
|
|
$ |
22,200 |
|
|
$ |
17,751 |
|
|
$ |
17,156 |
|
|
$ |
13,521 |
|
|
$ |
13,010 |
|
|
$ |
9,231 |
|
|
$ |
9,940 |
|
Cash surrender value-insurance premiums
|
|
|
(3,661 |
) |
|
|
(3,081 |
) |
|
|
(2,866 |
) |
|
|
(2,325 |
) |
|
|
(2,217 |
) |
|
|
(2,061 |
) |
|
|
(1,808 |
) |
Proceeds (death benefits)
|
|
|
2,967 |
|
|
|
4,851 |
|
|
|
1,754 |
|
|
|
3,062 |
|
|
|
1,230 |
|
|
|
3,057 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income impact of COLI
|
|
|
21,506 |
|
|
|
19,521 |
|
|
|
16,044 |
|
|
|
14,258 |
|
|
|
12,023 |
|
|
|
10,227 |
|
|
|
8,450 |
|
Cash surrender value-interest
|
|
|
(22,367 |
) |
|
|
(20,082 |
) |
|
|
(17,796 |
) |
|
|
(15,996 |
) |
|
|
(14,397 |
) |
|
|
(12,023 |
) |
|
|
(10,753 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pre-tax income impact of COLI
|
|
$ |
(861 |
) |
|
$ |
(561 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,752 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,738 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,374 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,796 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,303 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10) |
Calculated based on the average number of employees during the
applicable period. |
|
(11) |
Long-term debt includes $149,880, $178,481, $212,540, $225,373,
$245,882, $245,882 and $0 for fiscal 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and
2005 and the six months ended September 29, 2004 and
September 28, 2005, respectively, related to the Variable
Rate Senior Notes paid in cash and shares of EMJ common stock
upon completion of EMJs initial public offering on
April 20, 2005. |
21
SELECTED UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL DATA
The following selected unaudited pro forma combined financial
data has been derived from and should be read together with the
unaudited pro forma combined financial statements and related
notes on pages 93 through 99 of this proxy statement/
prospectus. This information is based on the historical
consolidated balance sheets and related historical consolidated
statements of income of Reliance and EMJ, giving effect to the
merger using the purchase method of accounting. The unaudited
pro forma balance sheet as of September 30, 2005 assumes
that the merger occurred as of that date. The unaudited pro
forma statements of income for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 and for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2004 reflect the merger as if it had occurred
as of January 1 of each respective period.
This information is for illustrative purposes only. Reliance and
EMJ may have performed differently had they always been
combined. You should not rely on the selected unaudited pro
forma combined financial data as being indicative of the
historical results that would have been achieved had the
companies always been combined or the future results that
Reliance will experience after the merger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months | |
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts) | |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
3,811.6 |
|
|
$ |
4,417.7 |
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
287.1 |
|
|
|
316.1 |
|
Net income from continuing
operations(1)
|
|
|
178.0 |
|
|
|
187.5 |
|
Earnings per common share from continuing operations
diluted
|
|
$ |
4.72 |
|
|
$ |
5.02 |
|
Earnings per common share from continuing operations
basic
|
|
$ |
4.74 |
|
|
$ |
5.05 |
|
|
|
(1) |
The twelve months ended December 31, 2004 amount is net of
$8.5 million of preferred dividends. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Total assets
|
|
$ |
3,148.9 |
|
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations (less current
portions)
|
|
|
1,079.3 |
|
22
COMPARATIVE UNAUDITED PER SHARE DATA
Set forth below are net income, cash dividends and book value
per Reliance share and EMJ share on a historical basis, for
Reliance on a pro forma combined basis per share, and for
Reliance and on a pro forma combined basis per EMJ-equivalent
share. The assumed exchange ratio is 0.0928 Reliance shares for
each EMJ share calculated by dividing $6.50 by the average
closing prices of Reliance common stock during the
20-day period ended
January 31, 2006 ($70.01). You should note that this
exchange ratio, and thus the amount of Reliance common stock to
be issued in the merger, may increase or decrease depending on
the average closing prices of Reliance common stock for the
pricing period prior to the effective time of the merger.
The Reliance pro forma combined data was derived by combining
the historical consolidated financial information of Reliance
and the historical consolidated financial information of EMJ
using the purchase method of accounting for business
combinations as described under Unaudited Pro Forma
Combined Financial Information beginning on page 93.
The Reliance pro forma combined data per EMJ-equivalent common
share shows the effect of the merger from the perspective of an
EMJ stockholder. The information was computed by multiplying the
Reliance pro forma combined earnings per share, cash dividends
and book value by the assumed exchange ratio of 0.0928.
You should read the information below together with the
historical financial statements and related notes contained in
the annual reports and quarterly reports that EMJ and Reliance
have filed with the SEC and have incorporated by reference in
this proxy statement/ prospectus. See Where You Can Find
More Information on page 117. The unaudited pro forma
combined data below is for illustrative purposes only and is
based on available information and assumptions that are believed
to be reasonable as of the date of this proxy statement/
prospectus. The financial results may have been different had
the companies always been combined due to, among other factors,
those factors discussed under Risk Factors beginning
on page 30. You should not rely on this information as
being indicative of the historical results that would have been
achieved had the companies always been combined or the future
results that Reliance will
23
experience after the merger. See Cautionary Statement
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements beginning on
page 28.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the | |
|
|
As of and for the | |
|
Twelve Months | |
|
|
Nine Months Ended, | |
|
Ended, | |
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Reliance historical per common share data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share from continuing operations
diluted
|
|
$ |
4.38 |
|
|
$ |
5.19 |
|
|
Earnings per common share from continuing operations
basic
|
|
|
4.40 |
|
|
|
5.23 |
|
|
Cash dividends per common share
|
|
|
.28 |
|
|
|
.26 |
|
|
Book value per common share at end of
period(1)
|
|
|
29.33 |
|
|
|
25.18 |
|
EMJ historical per common share data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share from continuing operations
diluted
|
|
$ |
2.55 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
Earnings per common share from continuing operations
basic
|
|
|
2.73 |
|
|
|
2.27 |
|
|
Cash dividends per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value per common share at end of
period(2)
|
|
|
2.49 |
|
|
|
(21.43 |
) |
Reliance pro forma per Reliance common share combined
data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share from continuing operations
diluted
|
|
$ |
4.72 |
|
|
$ |
5.02 |
|
|
Earnings per common share from continuing operations
basic
|
|
|
4.74 |
|
|
|
5.05 |
|
|
Cash dividends per common share
|
|
|
.28 |
|
|
|
.26 |
|
|
Book value per common share at end of
period(3)
|
|
|
34.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reliance pro forma per EMJ-equivalent common share combined
data:(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share from continuing operations
diluted
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
Earnings per common share from continuing operations
basic
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
|
Cash dividends per common share
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
Book value per common share at end of period
|
|
|
3.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The historical book value per share is computed by dividing
shareholders equity by the number of common shares
outstanding at the end of each period presented. |
|
(2) |
The historical book value per share is computed by dividing
stockholders equity by the number of common shares
outstanding at the end of each period presented. |
|
(3) |
The pro forma combined book value per share is computed by
dividing pro forma stockholders equity by the pro forma
number of shares outstanding at the end of the period, assuming
the issuance of 4,662,002 Reliance common shares in the merger. |
|
(4) |
The equivalent pro forma per share information is computed
assuming an exchange ratio of 0.0928 Reliance common share per
common share of EMJ. This exchange ratio does not take into
consideration the cash portion of the merger consideration of
$6.50 per share. |
24
COMPARATIVE MARKET PRICES AND DIVIDENDS
Comparative Market Prices
Reliance common stock is listed on the NYSE and traded under the
symbol RS. The following table sets forth, for the
calendar quarters indicated, the high and low reported trading
prices per share of Reliance common stock on the NYSE Composite
Transactions reporting system based on closing prices and cash
dividends declared per share of Reliance common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Price | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Calendar Year |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
Dividends | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter (through February 3, 2006)
|
|
$ |
82.79 |
|
|
$ |
62.90 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
66.64 |
|
|
|
49.15 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
52.93 |
|
|
|
37.52 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
43.62 |
|
|
|
35.04 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
47.36 |
|
|
|
36.29 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
41.90 |
|
|
|
33.72 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
41.89 |
|
|
|
36.33 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
40.32 |
|
|
|
31.96 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
35.95 |
|
|
|
27.39 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
On January 17, 2006, the last full trading day before the
public announcement of the merger agreement, the high and low
sales prices of shares of Reliance common stock as reported on
the New York Stock Exchange were $66.12 and $64.84,
respectively. On February 3, 2006, the last full trading
day before the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus, the
high and low sale prices of shares of Reliance common stock as
reported on the New York Stock Exchange were $82.99 and $81.12,
respectively.
EMJ closed its initial public offering of
17.6 million shares of EMJ common stock on
April 20, 2005. All of the shares were sold by EMJ.
EMJs common stock began trading on the New York Stock
Exchange on April 15, 2005, under the ticker symbol
JOR. The following table sets forth, for the
calendar quarters indicated, the high and low reported trading
prices per EMJ share on the NYSE Composite Transactions
reporting system based on closing prices and cash dividends
declared per EMJ share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Price | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Calendar Year |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
Dividends |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter (through February 3, 2006)
|
|
$ |
14.08 |
|
|
$ |
9.80 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
10.11 |
|
|
|
8.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
10.69 |
|
|
|
8.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter (beginning April 15, 2005)
|
|
|
9.20 |
|
|
|
6.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
On January 17, 2006, the last full trading day before the
public announcement of the merger agreement, the high and low
sales prices of shares of EMJ common stock as reported on the
New York Stock Exchange were $10.49 and $10.19, respectively. On
February 3, 2006, the last full trading day before
25
the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus, the high and low
sale prices of shares of EMJ common stock as reported on the
New York Stock Exchange were $14.12 and $13.82,
respectively.
Reliance shareholders and EMJ stockholders are advised to obtain
current market quotations for Reliance common stock and EMJ
common stock. The market price of Reliance common stock and
EMJ common stock will fluctuate between the date of this
proxy statement/ prospectus and the completion of the merger. No
assurance can be given concerning the market price of
(1) Reliance common stock before or after the effective
date of the merger or (2) EMJ common stock before the
effective date of the merger.
|
|
|
EMJ Equivalent Per Share Price |
On January 17, 2006, the last full trading day before the
public announcement of the merger agreement,
and ,
2006, the last full trading day before the date of this proxy
statement/ prospectus, the equivalent price per share of EMJ
common stock was $13.00 and
$ ,
respectively. The equivalent price per share of EMJ common stock
is equal to the value of Reliance common stock that an EMJ
stockholder would have received for one share of EMJ common
stock if the merger had taken place on those dates. We
calculated these equivalent numbers by multiplying the closing
market price per share of Reliance common stock on these dates
by an assumed exchange ratio of 0.1026
and ,
respectively, and adding the per share cash payment of $6.50. We
have based these assumed exchange ratios on the average closing
price of Reliance common stock on the New York Stock Exchange
during the 20 consecutive trading days ended January 12,
2006 and January 31, 2006, respectively. You should note
that this exchange ratio may decrease or increase depending on
the average closing prices of Reliance common stock during the
pricing period prior to the merger and the actual value of
Reliance common stock that an EMJ stockholder will receive upon
completion of the merger may be higher or lower than the prices
above. As a result, you should obtain current market quotations
for Reliance common stock and EMJ common stock before making any
decision about the merger.
Dividends
Reliance has paid quarterly cash dividends on its common stock
for 46 years. Reliances board of directors has
increased the quarterly dividend rate on a periodic basis. The
Reliance board of directors may reconsider or revise this policy
from time to time based on conditions then existing, including
Reliances earnings, cash flows, financial condition and
capital requirements or other factors the Reliance board of
directors may deem relevant. Reliance expects to continue to
declare and pay dividends in the future, if earnings are
available to pay dividends, but Reliance also intends to
continue to retain a portion of earnings for reinvestment in its
operations and expansion of its business. There can be no
assurance that either cash or stock dividends will be paid in
the future or that, if paid, the dividends will be in the same
amount or with the same frequency as paid in the past.
The private placement debt agreements for Reliances senior
notes and Reliances syndicated credit facility contain
covenants which, among other things, require Reliance to
maintain a minimum net worth and limit cash dividends based upon
Reliances earnings, restricting its ability to pay
dividends. Since Reliances initial public offering in
September 1994 through December 31, 2004, Reliance has paid
between 5% and 25% of earnings to its shareholders as dividends.
In July 2004, Reliance increased the dividend by 17% to
$.07 per share, and, in February 2005, Reliance increased
its dividend by 29% to $.09 per share, for a total increase
of 67% since June 2004.
EMJ has not paid any dividends since its initial public offering
in April 2005 and has no plans to pay cash dividends on its
common stock in the foreseeable future. In addition, EMJs
domestic credit facility prohibits EMJ from paying, and the
indenture for EMJs
93/4% senior
secured notes, or the
93/4%
notes, limits EMJs ability to pay,
26
dividends. Prior to EMJs initial public offering, EMJ had
not paid a stock dividend since its formation on May 3,
1990. Prior to EMJs initial offering, EMJ paid cash
dividends to its former parent Holding only in connection with
specific obligations of Holding from time to time, including,
(1) the payment of interest on indebtedness of Holding,
(2) the repurchase of Holdings capital stock from
employees of EMJ whose employment had terminated, as required
under the terms of Holdings stockholders agreement (which
terminated upon completion of EMJs merger and financial
restructuring and EMJs initial public offering), and
EMJs stock bonus plan (predecessor to the retirement
savings plan), and (3) redemption of stock options from
Mr. Nelson, EMJs chief executive officer, and a
terminated employee.
Following the merger, the former holders of EMJ common stock
will be entitled to receive dividends in respect of the shares
of Reliance common stock they receive as merger consideration as
may be declared by Reliances board of directors.
27
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The statements contained or incorporated by reference in this
proxy statement/ prospectus that are not historical facts are
forward-looking statements as defined in the U.S. Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as
believe, estimate, intend,
may, expect, anticipate,
predict, project, counting
on, plan, continue,
want, forecast, should,
would, is confident and will
and similar expressions as they relate to Reliance or EMJ are
intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These
statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve
risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to
predict. Except to the extent required by federal securities
laws, neither Reliance nor EMJ undertakes any obligation to
publicly release the result of any revisions to any such
forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or
circumstances after the date of this proxy statement/ prospectus
or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
All forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from expectations, including, but not limited to, the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
Expected cost savings from the merger may not be fully realized
or realized within the expected time frame, and costs or
expenses relating to the merger may be higher than expected; |
|
|
|
Revenues or margins following the merger may be lower than
expected; |
|
|
|
Costs or difficulties related to obtaining regulatory approvals
for and to completing the merger and, following the merger, to
the integration of the businesses of Reliance and EMJ may be
greater than expected; |
|
|
|
Synergies and accretion to reported earnings estimated to result
from the merger may not be realized and the level of costs and
expenses incurred by Reliance in connection with the merger may
be higher than expected; |
|
|
|
Reliances future operating results depend on a number of
factors beyond its control, such as the prices for and the
availability of metals, which could cause its results to
fluctuate significantly over time. During periods of low
customer demand, it could be more difficult for Reliance to pass
through price increases to its customers, which could reduce its
gross profit and net income; |
|
|
|
Changes in demand for the products that Reliance sells can cause
significant fluctuations in both availability and cost of the
products. A significant or rapid increase or decrease in costs
from current levels could have a severe negative impact on
Reliances gross profit; |
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange rates could change, which could affect
the price Reliance pays for metals and the results of its
foreign operations; |
|
|
|
Reliance services industries that are highly cyclical, and any
downturn in its customers industries could reduce its
revenue and profitability; |
|
|
|
The success of Reliances business is affected by general
economic conditions and, accordingly, its business was adversely
impacted by the economic slowdown or recession in 2003, 2002 and
2001. This could occur in future periods; |
|
|
|
Reliances business is very competitive and increased
competition could reduce gross profit margins and net income; |
|
|
|
As a decentralized business, Reliance depends on both senior
management and its operating employees. If Reliance is unable to
attract and retain these individuals, its results of operations
may decline; |
|
|
|
Interest rates on debt could increase; Reliances variable
rate debt is currently at relatively low historical levels and
rates, and it anticipates that these levels will increase
materially at closing and rates will continue to increase
through 2006; |
|
|
|
Reliance may not be able to consummate future acquisitions, and
those acquisitions that it does complete may be difficult to
integrate into its business; |
28
|
|
|
|
|
Reliance is subject to various environmental and other
governmental regulations which may require it to expend
significant capital and incur substantial costs; |
|
|
|
If existing shareholders sell their shares, the market price of
the Reliance common stock could be depressed; |
|
|
|
Principal shareholders who own a significant number of
Reliances shares may have interests that conflict with
yours; |
|
|
|
Reliance has implemented a staggered or classified board of
directors that may adversely impact your rights as a shareholder; |
|
|
|
Reliance may discover internal control deficiencies in its
decentralized operations or in an acquisition that must be
reported in its SEC filings, which may result in a negative
reaction by its shareholders that adversely impacts its stock
price; |
|
|
|
Reliances acquisitions, including EMJ, might fail to
perform as anticipated, which could result in an impairment
charge to write off some or all of the goodwill for that
entity; and |
|
|
|
Other economic, business, competitive or regulatory factors may
affect Reliances and EMJs businesses generally as
described in Reliances and EMJs filings with the SEC. |
All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements
attributable to Reliance or EMJ or persons acting on their
behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the
foregoing. New risks and uncertainties may arise from time to
time. We cannot predict these events or how they might impact
us. See Risk Factors beginning on page 30 of
this proxy statement/prospectus.
29
RISK FACTORS
Risks Relating to the Merger
|
|
|
Because the market price of Reliance common stock may
fluctuate, you cannot be certain of the precise value of the
merger consideration you will receive in the merger. |
You cannot be certain of the precise value of the consideration
to be received as a result of the merger. If the merger is
completed, you will be entitled to receive, for each share of
EMJ common stock that you own, $6.50 in cash and between 0.0892
and 0.1207 of a share of newly-issued Reliance common stock,
depending on the average closing price of Reliance common stock
for the pricing period. The exchange ratio will adjust to ensure
that the fraction of a share of Reliance common stock you
receive will be equal to $6.50 divided by the average closing
price of Reliance common stock for the pricing period so long as
the average Reliance stock price is equal to or between $72.86
and $53.86. However, the market value of that fraction of a
share of Reliance common stock you receive may have a value that
is greater or less than $6.50, as the trading price of Reliance
common stock on the date of the merger may be greater or less
than the average closing price of Reliance common stock for the
pricing period used to determine the exchange ratio. If the
average closing price of Reliance common stock for the pricing
period is less than $53.86, the exchange ratio will no longer
adjust upward, and you will receive 0.1207 of a share of
Reliance common stock for each share of EMJ common stock that
you own. This means that the value of the fraction of a share of
Reliance common stock you will receive will be below $6.50 to
the extent the market price of Reliance common stock is below
$53.86 when the merger is completed. If, however, the average
closing price of Reliance common stock for the pricing period is
more than $72.86, the exchange ratio will no longer adjust
downward, and you will receive 0.0892 of a share of Reliance
common stock for each share of EMJ common stock that you own.
This means that the value of the fraction of a share of Reliance
common stock you will receive will be above $6.50 to the extent
the market price of Reliance common stock is above $72.86 when
the merger is completed. The formula for calculating the
exchange ratio is set forth in the section entitled The
Merger Agreement Merger Consideration
beginning on page 75 of this proxy statement/ prospectus.
The prices of EMJ common stock and Reliance common stock at the
closing of the merger may vary from their respective prices on
the date the merger agreement was signed, on the date of this
proxy statement/ prospectus and on the date of the special
meeting. For example, (1) during 2005 and 2006 (from
April 15, 2005, when it commenced trading on the New York
Stock Exchange, through January 17, 2006, the last trading
day before the announcement of the merger), the trading prices
of EMJ common stock on the New York Stock Exchange ranged from a
low closing sale price of $6.70 per share to a high closing
sale price of $10.69 per share and (2) during 2004,
2005 and 2006 (through January 17, 2006, the last trading
day before the announcement of the merger), the trading prices
of Reliance common stock on the New York Stock Exchange ranged
from a low closing sale price of $27.39 per share to a high
closing sale price of $67.06 per share. These variations
may be the result of various factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in the business, operations or prospects of Reliance,
EMJ or the combined company; |
|
|
|
governmental, regulatory and/or litigation developments; |
|
|
|
market assessments as to whether and when the merger will be
completed; |
|
|
|
the timing of completion of the merger; and |
|
|
|
general stock market, economic and political conditions. |
You are urged to obtain a current market quotation for Reliance
common stock.
|
|
|
EMJ will be subject to business uncertainties and
contractual restrictions while the merger is pending. |
Uncertainty about the effect of the merger on employees,
customers and suppliers may have an adverse effect on EMJ and
consequently on Reliance. These uncertainties may impair
EMJs ability to retain and motivate key personnel until
the merger is completed, and could cause customers, suppliers and
30
others that deal with EMJ to defer purchases or other decisions
affecting EMJ, or to seek to change existing business
relationships with EMJ. If key employees depart because of
uncertainty about their future roles and the potential
complexities of integration, the combined companys
business following the merger could be harmed. In addition, the
merger agreement restricts EMJ from making certain acquisitions
and taking other specified actions without the consent of
Reliance until the merger occurs. These restrictions may prevent
EMJ from pursuing attractive business opportunities that may
arise prior to the completion of the merger. See the section
entitled The Merger Agreement No
Solicitation beginning on page 80 of this proxy
statement/ prospectus for a description of the restrictive
covenants applicable to EMJ.
|
|
|
Failure to complete the merger could negatively affect the
stock price and the future business and financial results of
EMJ. |
Although EMJs board of directors has recommended that
stockholders approve the proposal relating to the merger
agreement, if the recommendation of the board of directors is
adversely modified or withdrawn because the EMJ board of
directors exercises its fiduciary duties and the voting
agreement with the Kelso Funds is terminated there is no
assurance that this proposal will be adopted and approved by the
stockholders, and there is no assurance that Reliance and EMJ
will receive the necessary regulatory approvals or satisfy the
other conditions to the completion of the merger. If the merger
is not completed for any reason, EMJ will be subject to several
risks, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
EMJ may be required to pay and reimburse Reliance amounts of up
to approximately $20.5 million in the aggregate if the
merger agreement is terminated under certain circumstances; |
|
|
|
the current market price of EMJ common stock may reflect a
market assumption that the merger will occur, and a failure to
complete the merger could result in a negative perception by the
market of EMJ generally and a resulting decline in the market
price of EMJ common stock; |
|
|
|
many costs of EMJ relating to the merger (such as legal,
accounting, and a portion of its financial advisory fees) are
payable by EMJ whether or not the merger is completed; |
|
|
|
there may be substantial disruption to the business of EMJ and a
distraction of its management and employees from
day-to-day operations,
because matters related to the merger may require substantial
commitments of time and resources, which could otherwise have
been devoted to other opportunities that could have been
beneficial to EMJ; and |
|
|
|
EMJ would continue to face the risks that it currently faces as
an independent company, as further described in the documents
that EMJ has filed with the SEC that are incorporated by
reference into this proxy statement/ prospectus. |
In addition, EMJ would not realize any of the expected benefits
of having completed the merger. If the merger is not completed,
the risks described above may materialize and materially
adversely affect EMJs business, financial results,
financial condition, prospects and stock price.
|
|
|
EMJ executive officers and directors have financial
interests in the merger that are different from, or in addition
to, the interests of EMJ stockholders. |
Executive officers of EMJ participated in the negotiation of the
terms of the merger agreement with their counterparts at
Reliance, and EMJs board of directors approved the merger
agreement and unanimously recommended that EMJ stockholders vote
to adopt and approve the merger. In considering these facts and
the other information contained in this proxy statement/
prospectus, you should be aware that some of EMJs
executive officers and directors have financial interests in the
merger that are different from, or in addition to, the interests
of EMJ stockholders. For example, Mr. Nelson and
Mr. Johnson have entered into agreements with EMJ that may
provide, among other things, change of control, retention and
severance and other benefits following the merger. In addition,
certain executive officers have Holding options that will be
cashed out at a substantial premium over their exercise price as
a result of the merger. Mr. Nickell and
Mr. Wahrhaftig, who are members of EMJs board of
directors, are affiliated
31
with the Kelso Funds, which own approximately 50.1% of the
outstanding EMJ common stock. Pursuant to the registration
rights agreement, Reliance has agreed to register, and provide
the Kelso Funds with certain demand and piggyback registration
rights with respect to the shares of Reliance common stock
received by the Kelso Funds in the merger, to allow for the
orderly sale of the shares of Reliance common stock that they
receive as a result of the merger. These and some other
interests of EMJ directors and executive officers may create
potential conflicts of interest and cause some of these persons
to view the merger differently than you may view it, as a
stockholder. Please see The Merger Interests
of EMJs Directors and Executive Officers in the
Merger beginning on page 68 of this proxy statement/
prospectus for more information about these financial interests.
|
|
|
The merger agreement limits EMJs ability to pursue
alternatives to the merger. |
The merger agreement contains provisions that generally limit
EMJs ability to pursue alternatives to the merger with
Reliance. These provisions provide that EMJ may not
(1) initiate, negotiate, solicit or knowingly encourage or
facilitate (including by way of furnishing non-public
information) any proposals with respect to a takeover proposal,
(2) enter into any agreement with respect to any takeover
proposal or (3) furnish, or provide access to, any
information or data to, or have or participate in any
discussions or negotiations with, any person relating to a
takeover proposal; provided, however, that (a) EMJ may
respond to an unsolicited bona fide written takeover proposal
from a third party if EMJs board of directors determines
in good faith, after receiving advice of its outside legal
counsel and financial advisor, that the takeover proposal
constitutes or is reasonably likely to constitute a superior
proposal, and (b) EMJs board of directors may
withdraw or modify its recommendation of the merger if it
determines that a takeover proposal is a superior proposal or if
it determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside
legal counsel and financial advisors, that failure to withdraw
or modify its recommendation of the merger may be reasonably
expected to violate its fiduciary duties under applicable law.
In addition, Reliance is entitled to receive a termination fee
of approximately $20.5 million if Reliance terminates the
merger agreement due to EMJs board of directors
(1) withdrawing or adversely modifying its recommendation
of the merger, (2) recommending another takeover proposal
other than the merger or (3) determining to accept a
superior proposal.
Reliance required EMJ to agree to these provisions as a
condition to Reliances willingness to enter into the
merger agreement. These provisions, however, might discourage a
third party that might have an interest in acquiring all of or a
significant part of EMJ from considering or proposing that
acquisition, even if that party were prepared to pay
consideration with a higher per share market price than the
current merger consideration. Furthermore, a potential competing
acquiror might propose to pay a lower per share price to EMJ
stockholders than it would otherwise have proposed to pay
because of EMJs obligation, in connection with termination
of the merger agreement, to pay Reliance the termination fee of
approximately $20.5 million.
|
|
|
The price of Reliance common stock may be affected by
factors different from those affecting the price of EMJ common
stock. |
Holders of EMJ common stock will receive Reliance common stock
in the merger and thus will become holders of Reliance common
stock. The businesses of Reliance and EMJ differ in important
respects and, accordingly, Reliances results of
operations, as well as the price of Reliance common stock, may
be affected by factors different from those currently affecting
the independent results of operations of EMJ and the price of
EMJ common stock. The price of Reliance common stock may
fluctuate significantly following the merger, including
fluctuation due to factors over which Reliance has no control.
For a discussion of the businesses of Reliance and EMJ, see
Reliances Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2004 and EMJs Annual Report
on Form 10-K for
the year ended March 31, 2005, each of which is
incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus,
and Information about Reliance and Information
about EMJ beginning on page 91 and page 92,
respectively, of this proxy statement/ prospectus.
32
|
|
|
The opinions obtained by EMJ from its financial advisors
will not reflect changes in circumstances between signing of the
merger agreement and the completion of the merger. |
EMJ has not obtained updated opinions as of the date of this
proxy statement/ prospectus from its financial advisors. Changes
in the operations and prospects of Reliance or EMJ, general
market and economic conditions and other factors which may be
beyond the control of Reliance and EMJ, and on which the
financial advisors opinions were based, may significantly
alter the value of Reliance or EMJ or the prices of shares of
Reliance common stock or EMJ common stock by the time the merger
is completed. The opinions do not speak as of the time the
merger will be completed or as of any date other than the date
of such opinions. Because EMJ currently does not anticipate
asking its financial advisors to update their opinions, the
opinions will not address the fairness of the merger
consideration, from a financial point of view, at the time the
merger is completed. For a description of the opinions that EMJ
received from its financial advisors, please refer to The
Merger Opinion of Credit Suisse Securities
(USA) LLC to EMJs Board of Directors beginning
on page 52 and The Merger Opinion of
Duff & Phelps Securities, LLC to EMJs Board of
Directors beginning on page 57. For a description of
the other factors considered by EMJs board of directors in
determining to approve the merger, please refer to The
Merger EMJs Reasons for the Merger
beginning on page 50 and The Merger
Recommendation of EMJs Board of Directors beginning
on page 52.
|
|
|
EMJs stockholders voting power will be
diluted, and they will not be able to control the outcome of a
proposal voted on by Reliance stockholders. |
EMJs stockholders presently have the power to approve or
reject any matter affecting EMJ requiring the approval of
stockholders under Delaware law and EMJs certificate of
incorporation. Immediately after the merger, EMJs
stockholders, in the aggregate, will hold approximately 12.3% of
the outstanding shares of Reliance common stock (based on an
assumed exchange ratio of 0.0928, which would be the exchange
ratio if the average closing price for the pricing period was
$70.01). Even if all of the former EMJ stockholders voted in
concert on all matters presented to Reliances
shareholders, this number of Reliance shares, without a
substantial number of other holders of Reliance common stock
voting the same way, will not affect the outcome of proposals
voted upon by the shareholders of Reliance.
Risks Relating to Reliance After the Merger
|
|
|
Existing shareholders may sell their shares which could
depress the market price of Reliances common stock. |
Immediately following the merger, Reliances officers,
directors and significant shareholders (including the Kelso
Funds) will own approximately 7.4 million shares or
approximately 19.6% of the outstanding shares of Reliance common
stock that would be eligible to be resold into the public
market. If these shareholders sell a large number of these
shares or if there is a perception that they intend to sell a
large number of these shares, the market price of
Reliances common stock could decline, as these sales could
be viewed by the public as an indication of unfavorable
prospects for its operations.
|
|
|
Reliance may be unable to successfully integrate the
businesses of EMJ on a timely basis and realize the full
anticipated benefits of the merger. |
The merger involves the integration of two companies that have
previously operated independently. As with every merger, there
are potential difficulties of combining the companies
businesses. These may include the integration of EMJs
sales and marketing, distribution, processing, finance and
administrative operations, with and into Reliances
operations. The transition of certain processes following the
merger could cause an interruption of, or loss of momentum in,
the activities of one or more of the combined companys
businesses and the loss of key personnel. The diversion of
managements attention and any delays or difficulties
encountered in connection with the merger and the integration of
the two companies operations of these businesses could
have an adverse effect on the business, results of operations,
financial condition or prospects of Reliance after the merger.
33
|
|
|
The value of your investment may be subject to sudden
decreases due to the potential volatility of the price of
Reliance common stock. |
The market price of Reliance common stock may be highly volatile
and subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors,
including variations in Reliances quarterly results of
operations. Other factors may include matters discussed in other
risk factors and the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in expectations as to Reliances future financial
performance, including financial estimates by securities
analysts and investors; |
|
|
|
developments affecting Reliance, its customers or its suppliers; |
|
|
|
changes in the legal or regulatory environment affecting
Reliances business; |
|
|
|
press releases, earnings releases or publicity relating to
Reliance or its competitors or relating to trends in the metals
service industry; |
|
|
|
inability to meet securities analysts and investors
quarterly or annual estimates or targets of Reliance performance; |
|
|
|
the operating and stock performance of other companies that
investors may deem comparable; |
|
|
|
sales of Reliance common stock by the Kelso Funds; and |
|
|
|
general domestic or international economic, market and political
conditions. |
These factors may adversely affect the trading price of Reliance
common stock, regardless of Reliances actual operating
performance, and could prevent you from selling your Reliance
common stock at or above the value of the shares at the closing
of the merger. In addition, the stock markets from time to time
experience extreme price and volume fluctuations that may be
unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of
companies. In the past, some shareholders have brought
securities class action lawsuits against companies following
periods of volatility in the market price of their securities.
Reliance may in the future be the target of similar litigation.
Securities litigation, regardless of whether Reliances
defense is ultimately successful, could result in substantial
costs and divert managements attention and resources.
|
|
|
Reliances substantial indebtedness could impair its
financial condition and reduce the funds available to Reliance
for other purposes and Reliances failure to comply with
the covenants contained in its debt instruments could result in
an event of default that could adversely affect its operating
results. |
Reliance has substantial debt service obligations and will incur
more debt as a result of this merger. As of December 31,
2005, assuming the merger had been completed as of such date,
Reliance would have had aggregate outstanding indebtedness of
approximately $1.1 billion. Reliances substantial
indebtedness could adversely affect Reliance in the following
ways:
|
|
|
|
|
Reliances ability to obtain additional financing in the
future for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions,
general corporate purposes or other purposes may be impaired; |
|
|
|
a significant portion of Reliances cash flow from
operations must be dedicated to the payment of interest and
principal on its debt, which reduces the funds available to
Reliance for its operations or other purposes; |
|
|
|
some of Reliances debt is, and will continue to be, at
variable rates of interest, which may result in higher interest
expense in the event of increases in interest rates; |
|
|
|
because Reliance may be more leveraged than some of its
competitors, its debt may place Reliance at a competitive
disadvantage; |
|
|
|
Reliances leverage will increase its vulnerability to
economic downturns and limit Reliances ability to
withstand adverse events in its business by limiting
Reliances financial alternatives; |
34
|
|
|
|
|
EMJs noteholders could require repurchase of EMJs
93/4% notes,
as provided in the EMJ
93/4% notes
indenture, which would substantially increase Reliances
leverage and limit its access to funds for growth
initiatives; and |
|
|
|
Reliances ability to capitalize on significant business
opportunities and to plan for, or respond to, competition and
changes in its business may be limited. |
Reliances debt agreements contain, and any agreements to
refinance its debt likely will contain, financial and
restrictive covenants that limit Reliances ability to
incur additional debt, including to finance future operations or
other capital needs, and to engage in other activities that
Reliance may believe are in its long-term best interests,
including to dispose of or acquire assets or other companies or
to pay dividends to its shareholders. Reliances failure to
comply with these covenants may result in an event of default
which, if not cured or waived, could accelerate the maturity of
Reliances indebtedness or prevent Reliance from accessing
availability under its credit facility. If Reliances
indebtedness is accelerated, it may not have sufficient cash
resources to satisfy its debt obligations and Reliance may not
be able to continue its operations as planned.
|
|
|
Reliance may not be able to generate sufficient cash flow
to meet its debt service obligations. |
Reliances annual debt service obligations until
June 11, 2010, when its revolving credit facility is
expected to mature, will be primarily limited to interest and
principal payments on Reliances senior notes (with the
principal payable only as and when they mature), on its credit
facility, and on its industrial revenue bonds. Reliances
ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to make
scheduled payments on its debt obligations will depend on
Reliances future financial performance, which will be
affected by a range of economic, competitive and business
factors, many of which are outside of Reliances control.
For example, Reliance may not generate sufficient cash flow from
operations to repay its credit facility when it matures in 2010,
or its senior notes when they mature on various dates between
2006 and 2013 or its industrial revenue bonds when they mature
in 2009 and 2014. If Reliance does not generate sufficient cash
flow from operations to satisfy its debt obligations, Reliance
expects to undertake alternative financing plans, such as
refinancing or restructuring its debt, selling assets, reducing
or delaying capital investments or seeking to raise additional
capital. Reliance may not be able to consummate any such
transaction at all or on a timely basis or on terms, and for
proceeds, that are acceptable to it. Furthermore, these
transactions may not be permitted under the terms of
Reliances various debt instruments then in effect.
Reliances inability to generate sufficient cash flow to
satisfy its debt obligations, or to timely refinance its
obligations on acceptable terms, could adversely affect
Reliances ability to serve its customers and could cause
Reliance to discontinue its operations as planned.
Reliances credit facility is unsecured.
In the merger, the newly-formed subsidiary of Reliance will
assume all of the outstanding debt of EMJ, which, as of
September 28, 2005, was approximately $299 million. In
addition, as a result of the merger, the holders of EMJs
93/4% notes
have the option to require the redemption of the notes at 101%
of their face amount. The additional debt of EMJ and possible
redemption of EMJs
93/4% notes
might further impact Reliances ability to satisfy its debt
obligations following the merger.
|
|
|
Ongoing tax audits of Reliance may result in additional
taxes. |
Reliance and EMJ are undergoing various tax audits. These tax
audits could result in additional taxes, plus interest and
penalties being assessed against either or both companies.
|
|
|
The costs that Reliance pays for metals may fluctuate due
to a number of factors beyond their control, which, on a
combined basis, could adversely affect Reliances operating
results if they cannot pass on higher metal prices to their
customers. |
Reliance purchases large quantities of carbon, alloy, stainless
steel, aluminum and other metals, which it sells to a variety of
end-users. In 2004 the costs for carbon steel increased
significantly and rapidly from historic levels. Although these
costs declined somewhat in mid-2005, the costs increased in the
fourth
35
quarter of 2005 and overall carbon steel costs remained at
historically high levels. Costs for aluminum and stainless steel
products, excluding aerospace-related products, rose steadily in
2004 and there were some continued increases in 2005. Costs for
aerospace-related products have increased significantly
beginning in late 2004 and continued to increase through all of
2005. Reliance attempts to pass these cost increases on to its
customers with higher selling prices. The costs to Reliance for
these metals and the prices that it charges customers for its
products may change depending on many factors outside of its
control, including general economic conditions (both domestic
and international), competition, production levels, customer
demand levels, import duties and other trade restrictions,
currency fluctuations and surcharges imposed by Reliances
suppliers.
Reliance maintains substantial inventories of metal to
accommodate the short lead times and delivery requirements of
its customers. Accordingly, Reliance purchases metal in
quantities it believes to be appropriate to satisfy the
anticipated needs of its customers based on information derived
from customers, market conditions, historic usage and industry
research. Commitments for metal purchases are generally at
prevailing market prices in effect at the time orders are placed
or at the time of shipment. During periods of rising prices for
metal, Reliance may be negatively impacted by delays between the
time of increases in the cost of metals to Reliance and
increases in the prices that Reliance charges for its products
if it is unable to pass these increased costs on to its
customers. In addition, when metal prices decline, customer
demands for lower prices could result in lower sale prices for
Reliances products and, as Reliance uses existing
inventory that it purchased at higher metal prices, lower
margins. Consequently, during periods in which Reliance uses
this existing inventory, the effects of changing metal prices
could adversely affect Reliances operating results.
|
|
|
The price of metals is subject to fluctuations in the
supply and demand for metals worldwide and changes in the
worldwide balance of supply and demand could negatively impact
Reliances revenues, gross profit and net income. |
Metal prices are volatile due to, among other things,
fluctuations in foreign and domestic production capacity, raw
material availability, metals consumption and foreign currency
rates. For example, in the past few years, China has
significantly increased its consumption of metals and metal
products. This large and growing demand for metals has
significantly affected the metals industry, diverting supply to
China and contributing to the recent increase in metal prices.
If, in the future, China experiences a downturn in general
economic conditions or increases its internal production of
metals, its demand for metals produced outside of China could
decrease. Such a decrease could cause a reduction in metal
prices globally, which could adversely affect Reliances
revenues, gross profit and net income. Additionally, significant
currency fluctuations in the United States or abroad could
negatively impact Reliances cost of metals and the pricing
of its products. Recently, the decline in the dollar relative to
foreign currencies resulted in increased prices for metals and
metal products in the United States as imported metals became
relatively more expensive. If, in the future, the dollar
increases in value relative to foreign currencies, the domestic
market may be more attractive to foreign producers, resulting in
increased supply that could cause decreased metal prices and
adversely affect Reliances revenues, gross profit and net
income.
|
|
|
Reliance operates in an industry that is subject to
cyclical fluctuations and any downturn in general economic
conditions or its customers industries could negatively
impact its revenues, gross profit and net income. |
The metals service center industry is cyclical, impacted by both
market demand and metals supply. Periods of economic slowdown or
recession in the United States or other countries, or the public
perception that these may occur, could decrease the demand for
Reliances products and adversely affect its pricing. For
example, the general slowing of the economy in 2001, 2002 and
2003 adversely impacted Reliances product sales and
pricing. While Reliance experienced significantly improved
pricing and healthy demand levels in 2004 and 2005, this trend
may not continue. Changing economic conditions could
36
depress or delay demand for Reliances products, which
could adversely affect Reliances revenues, gross profit
and net income.
Reliance sells many products to industries that are cyclical,
such as the industrial equipment, oil, gas and energy,
construction, semiconductor, agricultural equipment and
transportation industries, including aerospace. The demand for
Reliances products is directly related to, and quickly
impacted by, demand for the finished goods manufactured by
Reliances customers in these industries, which may change
as a result of the general United States or worldwide economy,
domestic exchange rates, energy prices or other factors beyond
Reliances control. If Reliance is unable to accurately
project the product needs of its customers over varying lead
times or if there is a limited availability of products through
allocation by the mills or otherwise, Reliance may not have
sufficient inventory to be able to provide products desired by
its customers on a timely basis. In addition, if Reliance is not
able to increase sales of products to customers in other
industries when one or more of the cyclical industries that it
serves is experiencing a decline, Reliances revenues,
gross profit and net income may be adversely affected.
|
|
|
Reliance competes with a large number of companies in the
metals service center industry, and, if Reliance is unable to
compete effectively, Reliances revenues, gross profit and
net income may decline. |
Reliance competes with a large number of other general-line
distributors and specialty distributors in the metals service
center industry. Competition is based principally on price,
inventory availability, timely delivery, customer service,
quality and processing capabilities. Competition in the various
markets in which Reliance participates comes from companies of
various sizes, some of which have greater financial resources
than Reliance does and some of which have more established brand
names in the local markets Reliance serves. Accordingly, these
competitors may be better able to withstand changes in
conditions within Reliances customers industries and
may have greater operating and financial flexibility than
Reliance has. To compete for customer sales, Reliance may lower
prices or offer increased services at a higher cost, which could
reduce Reliances revenues, gross profit and net income.
|
|
|
If Reliance was to lose any of its primary suppliers or
otherwise be unable to obtain sufficient amounts of necessary
metals on a timely basis, Reliance may not be able to meet its
customers needs and may suffer reduced sales. |
Reliance has few long-term contracts to purchase metals.
Therefore, its primary suppliers of carbon steel, alloy steel,
stainless steel, aluminum or other metals could curtail or
discontinue their delivery of these metals to Reliance in the
quantities it needs. Reliances ability to meet its
customers needs and provide value-added inventory
management services depends on Reliances ability to
maintain an uninterrupted supply of metal products from its
suppliers. If Reliances suppliers experience production
problems, lack of capacity or transportation disruptions, the
lead times for receiving Reliances supply of metal
products could be extended and the cost of Reliances
inventory may increase. If, in the future, Reliance is unable to
obtain sufficient amounts of the necessary metals at competitive
prices and on a timely basis from its traditional suppliers,
Reliance may not be able to obtain these metals from acceptable
alternative sources at competitive prices to meet
Reliances delivery schedules. Even if Reliance does find
acceptable alternative suppliers, the process of locating and
securing these alternatives may be disruptive to its business,
which could have an adverse impact on Reliances ability to
meet its customers needs and reduce its sales, gross
profit and net income. In addition, if a significant domestic
supply source is discontinued and Reliance cannot find
acceptable domestic alternatives, Reliance may need to find a
foreign source of supply. Dependence on foreign sources of
supply could lead to longer lead times, increased price
volatility, less favorable payment terms and certain tariffs and
duties.
|
|
|
Reliances acquisition of EMJ is its largest and
first public company acquisition and there may be additional
risks of which Reliance is not aware or existing risks may
change over time. |
The EMJ acquisition is Reliances largest acquisition and
its first acquisition of a public company. There may be
additional risks associated with this acquisition that Reliance
is not aware of at the present time because Reliance has not
previously integrated a business of this size. After the
acquisition,
37
customers may choose to diversify their metals suppliers to
reduce their dependence on a single supplier for the majority of
their metals needs. Reliance may not be able to retain all of
the Reliance and EMJ customers, and any loss of customers and
the business that they bring to us could have an adverse effect
on our operating results.
Reliance has agreed to assume liability for EMJs various
retirement and pension plans. The actual costs for the benefits
to be provided to EMJs employees may exceed those
projected, and future actuarial assessments of the extent of
those costs may exceed the current assessment. Any adjustments
that are required to be made to the recorded liability for these
benefits could have an adverse effect on operating results and
financial condition. In addition, Reliance may be required to
make cash payments in excess or in addition to those that have
been projected, which could have an adverse effect on cash flow.
Reliance expects that it will record a significant amount of
goodwill related to the acquisition of EMJ. If EMJ does not
perform as anticipated, this could result in an impairment
charge that could be material.
|
|
|
If Reliance does not successfully implement its
acquisition growth strategy, its ability to grow its business
could be impaired. |
Reliance may not be able to identify suitable acquisition
candidates or successfully complete any acquisitions or
integrate any other businesses into its operations. If Reliance
cannot identify suitable acquisition candidates, Reliance is
unlikely to sustain its historical growth rates, and, if
Reliance cannot successfully integrate these businesses, it may
incur increased or redundant expenses. Moreover, any additional
indebtedness Reliance incurs to pay for these acquisitions could
adversely affect its liquidity and financial strength.
|
|
|
As a decentralized business, Reliance depends on both
senior management and Reliances key operating employees;
if Reliance is unable to attract and retain these individuals,
its ability to operate and grow its business may be adversely
affected. |
Because of Reliances decentralized operating style,
Reliance depends on the efforts of its senior management,
including its chief executive officer, David H. Hannah, its
president and chief operating officer, Gregg J. Mollins, and its
executive vice president and chief financial officer, Karla
Lewis, as well as other key operating employees. Reliance may
not be able to retain these individuals or attract and retain
additional qualified personnel when needed. EMJ has entered into
a retention agreement with EMJs vice president, chief
financial officer and secretary William S. Johnson, which
provides for employment and severance benefits and has a term of
three years, unless terminated earlier pursuant to its terms. If
Mr. Johnson continues to serve as EMJs vice
president, chief financial officer and secretary and his
employment is terminated under certain circumstances,
Mr. Johnson will be entitled to certain bonus amounts. See
The Merger Interests of EMJs Directors
and Officers in the Merger Johnson Retention
Agreement on page 68 of this proxy statement/
prospectus for additional information regarding
Mr. Johnsons retention agreement. Other than the
obligations RSAC will assume under Mr. Johnsons
retention agreement, Reliance does not have employment
agreements with any of its officers or employees, which may mean
they may have less of an incentive to stay with Reliance when
presented with alternative employment opportunities. In
addition, Reliances senior management and key operating
employees hold stock options that have vested and hold common
stock in Reliances employee stock ownership plan. These
individuals may, therefore, be more likely to leave Reliance if
the shares of its common stock significantly appreciate in
value. The loss of any key officer or employee will require
remaining officers and employees to direct immediate and
substantial attention to seeking a replacement. Reliances
inability to retain members of its senior management or key
operating employees or to find adequate replacements for any
departing key officer or employee on a timely basis could
adversely affect Reliances ability to operate and grow its
business.
38
|
|
|
Reliance is subject to various environmental and employee
safety and health regulations, which could subject Reliance to
significant liabilities and compliance expenditures. |
Reliance is subject to certain federal, state and local
environmental laws and regulations concerning air emissions,
wastewater discharges, underground storage tanks and solid and
hazardous waste disposal at or from its facilities.
Reliances operations are also subject to various employee
safety and health laws and regulations, including those
concerning occupational injury and illness, employee exposure to
hazardous materials and employee complaints. Environmental and
employee safety and health regulations are comprehensive,
complex and frequently changing. Some of these laws and
regulations are subject to varying and conflicting
interpretations. Reliance may be subject from time to time to
administrative and/or judicial proceedings or investigations
brought by private parties or governmental agencies with respect
to environmental matters and employee safety and health issues.
Currently, Reliance has no material outstanding unresolved
issues with environmental regulators. Proceedings and
investigations with respect to environmental matters and any
employee safety and health issues could result in substantial
costs to Reliance, divert its managements attention and
result in significant liabilities, fines or the suspension or
interruption of Reliances service center activities. Some
of Reliances current properties are located in industrial
areas with histories of heavy industrial use. The location of
these properties may require Reliance to incur expenditures and
to establish environmental liabilities for costs that arise from
causes other than Reliances operations. Future events,
such as changes in existing laws and regulations or their
enforcement, new laws and regulations or the discovery of
conditions not currently known to Reliance, could create
material compliance or remedial liabilities and costs which may
constrain Reliances operations or make such operations
more costly.
|
|
|
Reliances operating results have fluctuated, and are
expected to continue fluctuating, depending on the season, and
such fluctuations may adversely affect Reliances stock
price. |
Many of Reliances customers are in seasonal businesses,
including customers in the construction and related industries.
In addition, Reliances revenues in the months of July,
November and December traditionally have been lower than in
other months because of increased vacation days and holiday
closures for various customers. Consequently, you should not
rely on Reliances results of operations during any
particular quarter as an indication of Reliances results
for a full year or any other quarter. In addition, if analysts
and investors inaccurately estimate Reliances results of
operations in one or more future quarters and Reliances
operating results fall below expectations, Reliances stock
price may decline.
|
|
|
Reliances business could be adversely affected by
economic downturns. |
Demand for Reliances products is affected by a number of
general economic factors. A decline in economic activity in the
United States and other markets in which Reliance operates could
materially affect Reliances financial condition and
results of operation.
|
|
|
Damage to Reliances computer infrastructure and
software systems could harm Reliances business. |
The unavailability of any of Reliances information
management systems for any significant period of time could have
an adverse effect on Reliances operations. In particular,
Reliances ability to deliver products to its customers
when needed, collect its receivables and manage inventory levels
successfully largely depends on the efficient operation of
Reliances computer hardware and software systems. Through
Reliances information management systems, Reliance
provides inventory availability to its sales and operating
personnel, improves customer service through better order and
product reference data and monitors operating results.
Difficulties associated with upgrades, installations of major
software or hardware, and integration with new systems could
lead to business interruptions that could harm Reliances
reputation, increase its operating costs and decrease its
profitability. In addition, these systems are vulnerable to,
among other things, damage or interruption from power loss,
computer system and network failures, loss of telecommunications
services, operator negligence, physical and electronic loss of
data, or security breaches and computer viruses.
39
Reliance has contracted with a third-party service provider that
provides Reliance with backup systems in the event that its
information management systems are damaged. It is possible that
the backup facilities and other protective measures Reliance
takes could prove to be inadequate.
|
|
|
Principal shareholders who own a significant number of
shares may have interests that conflict with yours. |
After giving effect to the merger, assuming an average closing
price of Reliance common stock for the pricing period of $70.01
(which would be the average closing price for the pricing period
if the pricing period ended on January 31, 2006), Florence
Neilan, Reliances largest shareholder, will own 11.1% of
the outstanding shares of Reliance common stock and the Kelso
Funds will own 6.2% of the outstanding shares of Reliance common
stock. As a result, these shareholders may have the ability to
significantly influence matters requiring shareholder approval.
In deciding how to vote on such matters, these shareholders may
be influenced by interests that conflict with yours.
|
|
|
Reliance has implemented anti-takeover provisions that may
adversely impact your rights as a holder of Reliance common
stock. |
Reliances articles of incorporation and its bylaws could
delay, defer or prevent a third party from acquiring Reliance,
despite the possible benefit to its shareholders, or otherwise
adversely affect the price of Reliance common stock and the
rights of Reliances stockholders. Reliance is authorized
to issue 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, no par value,
with the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of
such stock to be determined by Reliances board of
directors, without a vote of the holders of common stock. The
Reliance board of directors could grant rights to holders of
preferred stock to reduce the attractiveness of Reliance as a
potential takeover target, or make the removal of management
more difficult. In addition, Reliances articles of
incorporation and bylaws (1) impose advance notice
requirements for shareholder proposals and nominations of
directors to be considered at shareholder meetings and
(2) establish a staggered or classified board of directors.
These provisions may discourage potential takeover attempts,
discourage bids for Reliances common stock at a premium
over market price or adversely affect the market price of, and
the voting and other rights of the holders of, Reliances
common stock. These provisions could also discourage proxy
contests and make it more difficult for you and other
shareholders to elect directors other than the candidates
nominated by Reliances board of directors. In addition,
Reliances credit facility and the provisions of
Reliances senior notes contain limitations on
Reliances ability to enter into change of control
transactions. See Comparison of Stockholders
Rights beginning on page 102 of this proxy statement/
prospectus for additional information on the anti-takeover
measures applicable to Reliance.
40
THE EMJ SPECIAL MEETING
This proxy statement/ prospectus is furnished in connection with
the solicitation of proxies from the holders of EMJ common stock
by EMJs board of directors for use at the special meeting
of EMJ stockholders. The purpose of the special meeting is for
you to consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt and approve
the merger agreement and the merger. A copy of the merger
agreement is attached to this proxy statement/ prospectus as
Annex A and made part of this proxy statement/ prospectus.
This proxy statement/ prospectus is first being furnished to EMJ
stockholders on or
about ,
2006.
Date, Time and Place of the Special Meeting
The special meeting will be held
on ,
2006,
at : a.m.
(local time)
at located
at ,
California.
Purpose of the Special Meeting
The purpose of the special meeting will be to:
|
|
|
1. allow the EMJ stockholders to consider and vote on a
proposal to adopt and approve the Agreement and Plan of Merger,
dated as of January 17, 2006, by and among EMJ, Reliance
and RSAC, pursuant to which EMJ will merge with and into RSAC,
with RSAC as the surviving corporation, and Reliance will pay
cash and issue shares of its common stock in exchange for the
outstanding common stock of EMJ; and |
|
|
2. to transact any other business that may properly come
before the meeting of stockholders or any adjournment or
postponement of the special meeting, including to consider and
vote upon any procedural matters incident to the conduct of the
special meeting, such as adjournment of the special meeting. |
Board Recommendation
EMJs board of directors determined that the merger
agreement and the merger are advisable and in the best interests
of EMJ and its stockholders and unanimously approved the merger
agreement and the merger. EMJs board of directors
unanimously recommends that EMJ stockholders vote
FOR adoption and approval of the merger
agreement at the special meeting.
Who May Vote
EMJ stockholders, as recorded in EMJs stock register at
the close of business
on ,
2006, will be entitled to receive notice of and vote at the
special meeting. As
of ,
2006, there
were stockholders
of record of EMJ common stock, as shown on the records of
EMJs transfer agent for such shares.
Outstanding Shares and Quorum
EMJ shares outstanding
on ,
2006, the record date for voting at the special meeting,
consisted of 50,237,094 shares of common stock with one
vote per share. The holders of a majority of the outstanding
shares of EMJ common stock on the record date, represented in
person or by proxy, will constitute a quorum for purposes of the
special meeting. A quorum is necessary to hold the special
meeting. Under the voting agreement, the Kelso Funds have agreed
to be present at the meeting, so, unless the voting agreement is
terminated, a quorum is assured. Any shares of EMJ common stock
held in treasury by EMJ or by any of its subsidiaries are not
considered to be outstanding for purposes of determining a
quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes, which will
occur when a registered broker, who holds stock in street name,
does not receive voting instructions from a beneficial owner,
will be treated as present for purposes of determining the
presence of a quorum. Once a share is represented at
41
the special meeting, it will be counted for the purpose of
determining a quorum at the special meeting and any adjournment
or postponement of the special meeting, unless the holder is
present solely to object at the beginning of the special meeting
to the transaction of any business because the meeting is not
lawfully called or convened. However, if a new record date is
set for the adjourned or postponed special meeting, then a new
quorum will have to be established.
How Proxies Work
EMJs board of directors is asking you to appoint Maurice
S. Nelson, Jr. and William S. Johnson as your proxy holders
to vote your shares at the special meeting to be held
on ,
2006. You make this appointment by voting the enclosed proxy
card using one of the voting methods described below. Giving EMJ
your proxy means you authorize the proxy holders to vote your
shares at the special meeting, according to the directions you
provide. You may vote for or against the merger agreement and
the merger or abstain from voting.
EMJ does not expect any matter to be brought before the special
meeting other than the merger proposal. If other matters are
properly presented at the special meeting, the persons named as
proxies will vote in their discretion with respect to such
matters. However, if a proposal regarding adjournment or
postponement of the special meeting is properly presented to
permit EMJs board of directors to further solicit proxies,
the persons named in the proxies will not have discretion to
vote shares voted against the merger agreement in favor of such
adjournment or postponement.
Returning a Signed Proxy without Voting Instructions
If you do return a signed proxy card without providing voting
instructions, your shares will be voted in favor of the approval
and adoption of the merger agreement and in the discretion of
the proxies on any other matters that may come before the
special meeting.
How EMJ Solicits Proxies
In addition to this mailing, EMJs directors, officers and
employees (who will receive no compensation in addition to their
regular salaries) may solicit proxies personally,
electronically, by telephone or with additional mailings. EMJ
pays the costs of soliciting this proxy. EMJ reimburses brokers,
banks and similar organizations, including the trustee of the
retirement savings plan, for their reasonable charges and
expenses in sending these materials to you and getting your
voting instructions.
How to Vote Your Shares
Voting EMJ shares you own directly. If your shares are
held in your name, you can vote your shares in person at the
special meeting or you can vote by proxy as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
By telephone: Use the toll-free number listed on the proxy card.
Easy-to-follow voice
prompts allow you to vote your shares. |
|
|
|
By Internet: The Website for Internet voting is listed on the
proxy card. |
|
|
|
By mail: Complete, sign, date and return your proxy card in the
enclosed pre-addressed, postage-paid envelope. |
The telephone and Internet voting procedures use a control
number that appears on your proxy card to authenticate you as a
stockholder of record and to allow you to confirm that your
voting instructions have been correctly recorded. If you vote by
telephone or Internet, you do not need to return the proxy card.
All proxy votes, whether cast by telephone, Internet or mail,
must be received by American Stock Transfer and Trust Co. by
11:59 p.m., Eastern Time,
on ,
2006.
If you receive more than one proxy card or proxy voting
instruction card it may mean that your EMJ shares are registered
in different ways (for example you own EMJ common stock directly
and through the retirement savings plan) or your shares are in
more than one account. Please provide voting instructions
42
for all proxy cards and proxy voting instruction cards you
receive to ensure that all of your EMJ shares are voted at the
special meeting.
Voting EMJ shares you hold through a nominee. If you hold
shares through someone else, such as a stockbroker, bank or
other nominee, you will receive material from that firm asking
how you want to vote. You can complete the firms voting
form and return it to the firm. If the firm offers telephone or
Internet voting, the voting form will contain instructions on
how to access those voting methods.
If you intend to vote your nominee shares in person at the
special meeting, you must bring to the special meeting an
account statement or letter from the nominee indicating that you
beneficially owned the shares
on ,
2006, the record date for voting.
Voting Shares in the Earle M. Jorgensen Retirement Savings
Plan
If you hold EMJ common stock in the Earle M. Jorgensen
Retirement Savings Plan, the trustee will vote those shares as
you direct. You may direct the trustee how to vote the number of
shares of EMJ common stock that are credited to your account as
of ,
2006, the record date. You can direct the trustee by completing
and returning your proxy voting instruction card or by telephone
or through the Internet, in accordance with the instructions
provided with respect to the retirement savings plan. All proxy
voting instructions for your retirement savings plan account,
whether by mail, telephone or Internet, must be received no
later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time,
on ,
2006 in order to be processed in a timely manner. Your voting
instructions will be kept confidential. If the trustee does not
receive timely voting instructions from you, the trustee will
vote all shares in the retirement savings plan for which it did
not receive voting directions in the same proportion as the
votes of the retirement savings plan shares for which it
received timely voting directions from other participants in the
retirement savings plan.
Revoking a Proxy
If you are a stockholder of record, you may change your vote in
one of the following ways before your proxy is voted at the
special meeting:
|
|
|
|
|
submit to the secretary of EMJ a revocation letter with a later
date than your proxy card; |
|
|
|
deliver, no later than 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time,
on ,
2006, a second completed and signed proxy card dated later than
the first signed proxy card; |
|
|
|
vote at a later time, but no later than 11:59 p.m., Eastern
Time,
on ,
2006, by telephone or the Internet; or |
|
|
|
attend the special meeting and vote in person. |
If you hold your shares through a nominee, you may later revoke
your proxy instructions by informing the broker in accordance
with the brokers procedures.
If you hold your shares through the retirement savings plan, you
must
|
|
|
|
|
deliver, no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time,
on ,
2006, a second completed and signed proxy voting
instruction card dated later than the first signed proxy
voting instruction card; or |
|
|
|
vote at a later time, but no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern
Time,
on ,
2006, by telephone or the Internet. |
To submit a written notice of revocation or other communications
about revoking your proxy, or to request a new proxy card, you
should write to:
Earle M. Jorgensen Company
10650 Alameda Street
Lynwood, California 90262
Attention: Secretary
43
If you are a street name stockholder, and you vote by proxy, you
may later revoke your proxy instructions by informing the holder
of record in accordance with that holders procedures.
Confidential Voting
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, EMJs
transfer agent, will count the votes. Its officers or employees
will serve as inspectors of election. Your individual vote,
proxies, consents, ballots and voting materials are
confidential, except in special circumstances (such as a
contested proxy or consent solicitation or as otherwise required
by law). For example, if you write comments on your proxy card
or accompanying material, your comments will be provided to EMJ
without indicating how you voted, unless you include your vote
in your comment or if how you voted is necessary to understand
your comment.
Effects of Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes
Absent specific instructions from the beneficial owner of
shares, brokers may not vote shares of EMJ common stock with
respect to the adoption of the merger agreement, any other
matters that may properly come before the special meeting, or
any adjournment or postponement of the special meeting. For
purposes of determining adoption and approval of the merger
agreement, abstentions and broker non-votes will have the same
effect as a vote against the merger agreement.
Vote Required
Each outstanding share of EMJ common stock on the record date
entitles the holder to one vote at the special meeting. Under
the provisions of EMJs certificate of incorporation and
the Delaware General Corporation Law, approval of the merger
agreement and the merger requires the affirmative vote of a
majority of the issued and outstanding shares of EMJs
common stock outstanding on the record date.
Because the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of
the outstanding shares of EMJ common stock is needed to adopt
and approve the merger agreement, the failure to submit your
proxy or vote in person will have the same effect as a vote
against the adoption and approval of the merger
agreement. Abstentions and broker non-votes also will have the
same effect as a vote against the adoption and
approval of the merger agreement. Accordingly, EMJs board
of directors urges stockholders to complete, date, sign and
return the accompanying proxy card, or to submit a proxy by
telephone or through the Internet by following the instructions
included with your proxy card, or, in the event you hold your
shares through a broker, bank, or other nominee, by following
the separate voting instructions received from your broker,
bank, or nominee.
As a condition to the signing of the merger agreement, Reliance
required the Kelso Funds, which collectively own approximately
50.1% of the EMJ common stock outstanding, to enter into a
voting agreement to vote all of their shares in favor of
adoption and approval of the merger agreement and the merger.
Therefore, unless the voting agreement is terminated prior to
the special meeting in accordance with its terms, the merger
will be approved at the special meeting regardless of the votes
of any other stockholders.
Adjournments and Postponements
Although it is not currently expected, the special meeting may
be adjourned or postponed for the purpose of soliciting
additional proxies. Any adjournment may be made without notice,
other than by an announcement made at the special meeting. The
person presiding at the special meeting or a majority of the
shares of EMJ common stock present in person or represented by
proxy at the special meeting may adjourn the special meeting,
whether or not a quorum is present. Any signed proxies received
by EMJ will be voted in favor of an adjournment in these
circumstances, although a proxy vote against
adoption and approval of the merger agreement will not be voted
in favor of an adjournment for the purpose of soliciting
additional proxies. Any adjournment or postponement of the
special meeting for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies
will allow the EMJ stockholders who have already sent in their
proxies to revoke them at any time prior to their use at the
special meeting as adjourned or postponed,
44
provided that, such revocation is in compliance with the
instructions (including as to the timing) set forth in the
section entitled The EMJ Special Meeting
Revoking a Proxy beginning on page 43 of this proxy
statement/ prospectus and the enclosed proxy card, and provided
further, that if you participate in the retirement savings plan,
any revocation or other instruction must be given to the trustee
at least three days prior to the date of the special meeting as
adjourned or postponed.
Householding
Some banks, brokers, and other nominee record holders may be
participating in the practice of householding proxy
statements and annual reports. This means that only one copy of
this proxy statement/ prospectus may have been sent to multiple
stockholders in your household. EMJ will promptly deliver a
separate copy of this proxy statement/ prospectus to you if you
write or call Earle M. Jorgensen Company, 10650 Alameda
Street, Lynwood, California, Attention: William S. Johnson,
Secretary, Telephone: (323) 567-1122.
Stockholders should NOT send stock certificates with their
proxy cards.
If the merger is completed, stockholders will be mailed a
transmittal form promptly by the exchange/paying agent following
the completion of the merger with instructions on how to
exchange their EMJ common stock certificates.
45
THE MERGER
This section of the proxy statement/ prospectus describes
material aspects of the merger. While Reliance and EMJ believe
that the description covers the material terms of the merger and
the related transactions, this summary may not contain all of
the information that is important to you. You should carefully
read this entire proxy statement/ prospectus, the attached
Annexes, and the other documents which this proxy statement/
prospectus incorporates by reference, for a more complete
understanding of the merger. The merger agreement, not this
summary, is the legal document which governs the merger.
General
EMJs board of directors is using this proxy statement/
prospectus to solicit proxies from the holders of EMJ common
stock for use at the EMJ special meeting, where holders of EMJ
common stock will be asked to vote upon adoption and approval of
the merger agreement. In addition, Reliance is sending this
document to EMJ stockholders as a prospectus in connection with
the issuance of shares of Reliance common stock in exchange for
EMJ common stock in the merger.
Background of the Merger
During the week of September 12, 2005, UBS, financial
advisor to Reliance, contacted Mr. Wahrhaftig, to express
preliminary interest in an acquisition of EMJ by Reliance.
Mr. Wahrhaftig is one of EMJs directors and a
managing director of Kelso & Company, whose affiliates
own a majority of EMJs outstanding common stock.
Mr. Wahrhaftig suggested that UBS have Mr. Hannah
contact Kelso. Mr. Hannah is the chief executive officer of
Reliance. On September 19, 2005, Mr. Wahrhaftig and
Mr. Nickell, a director of EMJ and chief executive officer
of Kelso, spoke to Mr. Hannah and Mr. Mollins,
president and chief operating officer of Reliance.
Mr. Hannah confirmed Reliances interest in the
acquisition of EMJ for consideration consisting of both cash and
Reliance common stock in an amount in excess of $12.00 per
share. On September 20, 2005, the closing price of
EMJs common stock was $10.01 and the closing price of
Reliance common stock was $48.98. Mr. Hannah suggested that
the next steps would be to enter into a confidentiality
agreement and have Reliance conduct preliminary due diligence
prior to making a more specific proposal. Mr. Nickell and
Mr. Wahrhaftig indicated that they would contact the other
members of EMJs board of directors to determine the
boards interest in entering into a confidentiality
agreement and allowing preliminary due diligence.
Mr. Nickell and Mr. Wahrhaftig promptly notified each
of the other members of EMJs board of directors of
Reliances interest. Each of EMJs directors indicated
his willingness to enter into a confidentiality agreement and
provide preliminary due diligence information. On
September 20, 2005, Mr. Nickell and
Mr. Wahrhaftig called Mr. Hannah to advise him that
EMJs board of directors was interested in proceeding
further to investigate the possibility of a transaction.
Mr. Nickell and Mr. Wahrhaftig, on behalf of
EMJs board of directors, then directed EMJs outside
legal counsel, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, to prepare a
confidentiality agreement. Reliance and EMJ entered into a
mutual confidentiality agreement on October 5, 2005.
On October 6, 2005, Mr. Nickell and
Mr. Wahrhaftig, on behalf of EMJs board of directors,
met with Mr. Hannah and Mr. Mollins to discuss in
general terms the background of the two companies and
Reliances philosophy with respect to the operation of
companies following acquisition. In addition, they discussed the
metals service center industry and mutual perceptions of the two
companies. They also discussed the next steps in the process of
determining the potential for a transaction. The parties agreed
that Reliance would provide a preliminary due diligence request
list to Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP. On October 7, 2005,
Reliance sent a preliminary due diligence request list to Katten
Muchin Rosenman LLP. On October 7, 2005, after discussing
potential financial advisors with members of EMJs board of
directors and obtaining their recommendation, Katten Muchin
Rosenman LLP contacted Credit Suisse to explore their interest
in providing financial advisory services to EMJs board of
directors with respect to a possible transaction. Credit Suisse
was contacted because of its expertise in providing financial
advisory services in merger and acquisition transactions and its
long-standing relationship with EMJ, commencing
46
in 1993 and continuing through its role as joint-bookrunning
underwriter of the EMJ initial public offering in April 2005.
On October 11, 2005, EMJs board of directors held a
special meeting. Mr. Nickell reviewed the discussions with
UBS and Mr. Hannah in which Reliance had expressed an
interest in acquiring EMJ. Mr. Nelson, EMJs chief
executive officer, also reported that he had a telephone
conversation with Mr. Hannah on October 5, 2005, in
which Mr. Hannah confirmed Reliances interest in
acquiring EMJ. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP informed the members
of EMJs board of directors that EMJ had entered into a
mutual confidentiality agreement with Reliance and was preparing
a response to a preliminary due diligence request list received
from UBS. Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP also noted that they were
reviewing the public filings of Reliance with a view to
preparing a similar request for information from Reliance.
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP provided EMJs board of
directors with an overview of its fiduciary duties, and the
procedures for reviewing, evaluating and negotiating a possible
transaction and discussed with them the standards of conduct and
the alternatives that should be considered in connection with a
possible sale of EMJ. Such discussion included a discussion of
EMJs strategic alternatives, including continuing as an
independent company, conducting a formal or informal auction
process and negotiating exclusively with Reliance.
After such discussion, Credit Suisse joined the meeting by
conference call to make a presentation to EMJs board of
directors with respect to its possible engagement as EMJs
financial advisor in connection with a transaction. Credit
Suisse discussed its qualifications and the team of
professionals that it would use on a transaction, reviewed the
publicly-available information with respect to EMJ and Reliance,
provided an overview of the financial analyses that would be
used to assess the terms of any transaction and discussed the
processes for EMJ to consider a proposal from Reliance and
compare such a proposal to EMJs strategic alternatives.
Following the presentation, Credit Suisse left the call, and
EMJs board of directors discussed Credit Suisses
qualifications and the advantages and disadvantages of
interviewing other candidates. After such discussion, EMJs
board of directors authorized the engagement of Credit Suisse as
EMJs financial advisor, decided to pursue discussions with
Reliance to develop a proposal and authorized Mr. Mason,
Mr. Nelson, Mr. Nickell, and Mr. Wahrhaftig to be
the primary contacts with Credit Suisse.
On October 12, 2005, Mr. Wahrhaftig called
Mr. Hannah to confirm that Credit Suisse had been engaged
by EMJ and to discuss the timing of a management meeting. On
October 14, 2005, EMJ provided Reliance with materials in
response to the preliminary due diligence request list. On
October 17, 2005, Credit Suisse submitted to Reliance a
preliminary due diligence request list with respect to Reliance.
On October 19, 2005, Mr. Nelson, Mr. McCaffery
and Mr. Johnson, the senior executive officers of EMJ, met
with Mr. Hannah, Mr. Mollins and Ms. Lewis, their
counterparts at Reliance. Representatives from Credit Suisse and
UBS also attended the meeting. The representatives of EMJ
discussed their operations and answered questions from
representatives of Reliance. Representatives of Reliance also
discussed generally their expectations of how EMJ might be
combined with Reliance.
On October 28, 2005, EMJ received from Reliance a letter
and summary of terms proposing the acquisition of all of the EMJ
common stock at a purchase price of $12.00 per share with
consideration consisting of 50% cash and 50% Reliance common
stock. Reliance also asked for certain transaction protections
including a break up fee equal to 4% of the equity value, a
voting agreement requiring the Kelso Funds to vote in favor of
the transaction, whether or not EMJs board of directors
had withdrawn or adversely modified its recommendation of the
transaction, and an option on the shares owned by the Kelso
Funds at the transaction price. Mr. Hannah also called
Mr. Nelson to confirm that he had received the proposal and
to highlight some of the terms. The letter and summary of terms
were promptly provided to the members of EMJs board of
directors.
On October 31, 2005, EMJs board of directors held a
special meeting. Mr. Nelson reported on the due diligence
meeting held with the management of Reliance. Representatives of
Credit Suisse reviewed with EMJs board of directors the
letter and summary of terms. After some discussion it was agreed
that
47
discussion would be continued at a meeting to follow EMJs
regularly scheduled quarterly board meeting on November 2,
2005.
On November 2, 2005, following EMJs regular board
meeting, EMJs board of directors met with its advisors to
review the letter and summary of terms received from Reliance
and to consider EMJs response. EMJs board of
directors discussed, among other issues, the proposed purchase
price, the premium it represented over EMJs closing price
on November 1, 2005, and EMJs stock performance since
the initial approach by Reliance. In addition, the members of
the board of directors discussed the proposed levels of the cash
and stock consideration, the trading price of the Reliance
common stock relative to historic levels and customary
transaction protection provisions. On November 1, 2005, the
closing price of EMJ common stock was $8.24 and the closing
price of Reliances common stock was $57.89. Credit Suisse
reviewed the provisions of the summary of terms and a
preliminary financial analysis of both companies based on
publicly available information. EMJs board of directors
also discussed with its advisors the ability of Reliance to
finance the proposed transaction, and the prospect for
increasing the percentage of consideration to be paid in cash. A
variety of alternative proposals and negotiation strategies were
discussed. On November 4, 2005, Mr. Hannah spoke with
Mr. Wahrhaftig regarding the proposal and the timing of
EMJs response. At that time, Mr. Wahrhaftig asked
whether Reliance would be willing to increase the cash portion
of the consideration, but Reliance was not willing to make a
significant change. An EMJ board meeting was scheduled for
November 7, 2005 after Credit Suisse had completed
additional financial analysis.
On November 7, 2005, EMJs board of directors held a
special meeting and received a formal presentation from Credit
Suisse as to its preliminary financial analysis of EMJ.
EMJs board of directors then reviewed the letter and
summary of terms from Reliance and decided to make a
counterproposal. The board of directors directed Credit Suisse
to propose a $14.00 per share all cash purchase price and a
break up fee of 3% of the equity value. After discussion with
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP of the legal considerations of a
voting agreement and an option on the shares owned by the Kelso
Funds, the board directed Credit Suisse to propose a voting
agreement between Reliance and the Kelso Funds subject to
customary termination provisions if EMJs board of
directors withdraws or adversely modifies its recommendation of
the merger, and to reject the request for an option on the
shares owned by the Kelso Funds. EMJs board of directors
also discussed the potential treatment of stock options.
EMJs board of directors determined that the
counterproposal should contain provisions for vested Holding
options to be paid in cash, and for the EMJ options granted in
2005 to be rolled over into comparable Reliance options.
EMJs management team other than Mr. Nelson was asked
to leave the meeting and EMJs board of directors also
discussed a retention agreement for Mr. Johnson because of
the potential for reduced responsibilities for Mr. Johnson
following the merger. EMJs board of directors determined
it was appropriate to give Mr. Johnson a retention
agreement that would provide him with additional compensation up
to the limits of Section 280G of the Code. EMJs board
of directors then discussed a bonus pool to be provided for
EMJs senior management. The bonus pool would provide
compensation for the exceptional management performance that had
enabled EMJ to successfully complete the merger and financial
restructuring and initial public offering in 2005.
Mr. Nickell proposed a bonus pool of $5 million. The
allocation of the bonus pool would be based on the
recommendations of Mr. Nelson and the approval of those
allocations by EMJs board of directors. EMJs board
of directors unanimously approved the proposal and directed that
Mr. Johnsons retention agreement and the bonus pool
be included in the counterproposal to Reliance.
On November 11, 2005, EMJs board of directors held a
special meeting to discuss Reliances response to
EMJs counterproposal. Reliance had responded with a
purchase price of $12.30 per share, with consideration
consisting of 50% cash and 50% Reliance common stock. Reliance
continued to ask for transaction protection provisions including
a break up fee equal to 4% of the equity value, a voting
agreement between Reliance and the Kelso Funds that would not be
subject to termination upon a change in EMJs board of
directors recommendation, and an option on the stock held
by the Kelso Funds. Reliance agreed to the Johnson retention
agreement and the bonus pool as proposed. Reliance noted that it
would require 30 business days to complete formal due diligence
and negotiate definitive agreements
48
and requested exclusivity for that period. Credit Suisse
reported that UBS had indicated that Reliance was not prepared
to pay $14.00 per share, or to enter into a transaction
that did not contain 50% of the merger consideration in stock.
EMJs board of directors reviewed the Reliance proposal,
and instructed Credit Suisse to indicate that $12.30 per
share was not an acceptable price. The members of EMJs
board of directors were advised that because of their large
holdings of EMJ stock, the Kelso Funds would be the only EMJ
stockholders that would not be able to resell the Reliance
common stock received as merger consideration without those
shares being registered for resale. As a result, the members of
EMJs board of directors asked Credit Suisse to determine
what measures could be provided for the orderly sale of the
Reliance common stock that would be received by the Kelso Funds
upon completion of a transaction.
On November 17, 2005, EMJs board of directors held a
special meeting to receive a report from Credit Suisse on
discussions with UBS. Credit Suisse advised EMJs board of
directors that in their discussion with UBS, UBS had insisted
that it needed an indication of price to discuss a response with
Reliance. Credit Suisse had responded that they had no specific
instructions or authorization from EMJ, but suggested that a
price of $13.70 would reflect a decrease in EMJs current
position commensurate with the increase shown by Reliance from
its previous offer. UBS responded that its client would not make
another bid without a revised proposal from EMJ. UBS also
indicated that Reliance would be willing to provide liquidity
for the Kelso Funds in the form of customary registration rights
and to treat the Holding and EMJ options as requested. After
discussion, EMJs board of directors instructed Credit
Suisse to propose a purchase price of $13.25 per share and
to agree to merger consideration consisting of 50% cash and 50%
Reliance common stock and a due diligence period and exclusivity
of 30 business days. In addition, the proposal included a
symmetrical collar of 15% based on a trading period prior to
signing definitive documentation, and a break up fee of 3% of
the equity value.
On November 22, 2005, EMJs board of directors held a
special meeting to receive a report from Credit Suisse. Credit
Suisse reported that Reliance had proposed a purchase price of
$12.75 per share, with consideration consisting of 50% cash
and 50% Reliance common stock and an exchange ratio based on the
closing price of Reliance common stock on November 21,
2005, which was $64.11 per share, subject to a 15%
symmetrical collar, and a break up fee equal to 3% of the equity
value. Reliance continued to ask for a voting agreement between
Reliance and the Kelso Funds that would not be subject to
termination upon the withdrawal of or a change in the
recommendation of EMJs board of directors and an option on
the stock held by the Kelso Funds. After discussion, EMJs
board of directors instructed Credit Suisse to propose a
purchase price of $13.00 per share, with consideration
consisting of 50% cash and 50% Reliance common stock, and a
customary mechanism of determining the exchange ratio in
connection with the collar based on the average closing price of
the Reliance stock for a period prior to signing of definitive
documentation. After additional discussion with Katten Muchin
Rosenman LLP of the relevant legal considerations, EMJs
board of directors reiterated that the voting agreement should
be subject to customary termination provisions if EMJs
board of directors withdraws or adversely modifies its
recommendation of the merger and that they would not allow the
Kelso Funds to provide an option on their shares.
On November 28, 2005, EMJs board of directors held a
special meeting. Credit Suisse reported on its discussions with
UBS and reviewed a term sheet summarizing the terms of a
proposed transaction. Credit Suisse indicated that Reliance had
agreed to a purchase price of $13.00 per share of EMJ, with
consideration consisting of 50% cash and 50% Reliance common
stock. Reliance had also agreed to a symmetrical collar of 15%
on an exchange ratio to be determined based on the average
closing price of the Reliance common stock for a trading period
prior to signing definitive documentation to be negotiated, and
a voting agreement between Reliance and the Kelso Funds subject
to customary termination provisions if EMJs board of
directors withdraws or adversely modifies its recommendation of
the merger. The parties had further agreed that due diligence
would commence immediately. The term sheet provided for an
exclusive period of 30 business days in which to complete due
diligence and negotiate and sign definitive documentation.
EMJs board of directors also decided to engage
Duff & Phelps to provide an independent fairness
opinion in connection with the transaction. Duff &
Phelps was selected because of their expertise
49
as financial advisor in mergers and acquisitions, as well as
their past involvement with EMJ as financial advisor to the EMJ
stock bonus plan, including in connection with the merger and
financial restructuring and initial public offering in April
2005.
Representatives of Reliance commenced formal due diligence on
November 29, 2005, and due diligence continued throughout
the period up to the signing of the merger agreement. On
December 1, 2005, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP delivered
drafts of the merger agreement and the voting agreement to
Reliance and its representatives. On December 5, 2005,
representatives of EMJ followed up with supplemental requests
for diligence information from Reliance, which information was
received during the week following the request. A mutual due
diligence meeting was held on December 15, 2005, with EMJ
and Reliance management and their respective advisors. The
parties continued to negotiate the merger agreement, voting
agreement and other related documents through the first half of
January.
On January 17, 2006, EMJs board of directors met to
review the merger agreement and discuss the proposed
transaction. EMJ management and representatives of Katten Muchin
Rosenman LLP described the due diligence process and summarized
the results of EMJs due diligence on Reliance. Katten
Muchin Rosenman LLP then discussed with EMJs board of
directors the legal principles and standards applicable to its
consideration of the proposed merger, described the material
terms of the merger agreement, voting agreement and the
transaction and discussed the projected timetable for the
transaction. Following discussion among, and questions by
EMJs board of directors and others present, Credit Suisse
reviewed with the board of directors its financial analysis with
respect to the merger consideration and rendered to the board of
directors an oral opinion, which opinion was confirmed by
delivery of a written opinion dated January 17, 2006, to
the effect that, as of that date and based on and subject to the
matters described in its opinion, the merger consideration was
fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of EMJ
common stock (other than Reliance and its subsidiaries, the
Kelso Funds and their respective affiliates). See
Opinion of Credit Suisse Securities
(USA) LLC to the Board of Directors of EMJ. Also at
this meeting, Duff & Phelps reviewed with the board of
directors its financial analysis with respect to the merger
consideration and rendered to EMJs board of directors an
oral opinion, which opinion was confirmed by delivery of a
written opinion dated January 17, 2006, to the effect that,
as of that date and based on and subject to the matters
described in its opinion, the merger consideration was fair,
from a financial point of view, to the holders of EMJ common
stock (other than Reliance and its subsidiaries, the Kelso Funds
and their respective affiliates). See Opinion of
Duff & Phelps Securities, LLC to EMJs Board of
Directors. Following further discussion and questions to
EMJs management and advisors, EMJs board of
directors determined that the merger was advisable and in the
best interests of EMJ and its stockholders and the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement were unanimously approved and adopted.
After approval by the respective boards of directors of EMJ and
Reliance, the merger agreement and voting agreement were
executed by the parties to such agreements and the proposed
merger was jointly announced by EMJ and Reliance on the evening
of January 17, 2006, after the close of U.S. financial
markets.
EMJs Reasons for the Merger
EMJs board of directors consulted with EMJs
management, as well as its legal and financial advisors, in its
evaluation of the merger. In reaching its conclusion to approve
the merger agreement and in determining that the merger is in
the best interests of EMJ and its stockholders, EMJs board
of directors considered a number of factors, including the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
the price being paid for each share of EMJ common stock
represents a substantial premium over historical trading prices,
including a premium of 30% over the initial public offering
price of $10.00, 24.6% over the closing sale price on the New
York Stock Exchange on January 17, 2005 (the trading day on
which EMJ announced the execution of the merger agreement), and
31.1% over the preceding 30-trading day average, 37.1% over the
preceding 60-trading day average and 36.5% over the preceding
90-trading day average; |
50
|
|
|
|
|
its belief that the merger was more favorable to stockholders
than any other alternative reasonably available to EMJ and its
stockholders, including a business combination with another
company in the metals and steel industry (based on its belief
that no other company in the metals and steel industry with the
ability to acquire EMJ was likely to be interested in pursuing a
business combination with EMJ and no private investment
management firm or financial buyer was likely to offer a
purchase price greater than the purchase price agreed to with
Reliance); |
|
|
|
its belief that Reliance would be able to consummate the
transaction and successfully integrate the EMJ operations,
taking into account Reliances track record in successfully
integrating substantial acquisitions; |
|
|
|
its belief that the market price of the EMJ common stock was not
likely to rise to the level of the purchase price in the near
future if EMJ continued as an independent company because of the
overhang of the Kelso Funds ownership interest, the
relatively low amount of EMJ common stock held by the public,
the low average daily trading volume of the EMJ common stock,
the cyclical nature of the steel and metals industry on which
EMJs business depends and general economic and market
conditions both on a historical and prospective basis; |
|
|
|
its belief that the 15% symmetrical collar protected the EMJ
stockholders from a possible decline within the collar range of
the Reliance common stock from its current trading levels; |
|
|
|
the financial and other terms and conditions of the merger
agreement, including the terms relating to the receipt and
consideration of alternative acquisition proposals; |
|
|
|
the fact that the transaction will be immediately accretive to
the earnings of Reliance and the stockholders of EMJ will be
able to participate in the potential benefits of the transaction
to the Reliance common stock because approximately 50% of the
merger consideration consists of Reliance common stock; |
|
|
|
the market position of the combined company, including that it
will be an industry leader in the distribution of flat-rolled,
tubular and bar products and carbon steel, stainless steel and
aluminum products; |
|
|
|
the likelihood that the regulatory approvals needed to complete
the transaction will be obtained; |
|
|
|
the historical and current market prices of Reliance common
stock and EMJ common stock as well as comparative valuation
analyses for the two companies; |
|
|
|
the financial presentation of Credit Suisse, including Credit
Suisses opinion dated January 17, 2006 to EMJs
board of directors as to the fairness of the merger
consideration, from a financial point of view, to the EMJ common
stockholders (other than Reliance and its subsidiaries, the
Kelso Funds and their respective affiliates) (see
Opinion of Credit Suisse Securities
(USA) LLC to EMJs Board of Directors); |
|
|
|
the financial presentation of Duff & Phelps, including
Duff & Phelps opinion dated January 17,
2006, to EMJs board of directors as to the fairness of the
merger consideration, from a financial point of view, to the EMJ
common stockholders (other than Reliance and its subsidiaries,
the Kelso Funds and their respective affiliates) (see
Opinion of Duff & Phelps Securities,
LLC to EMJs Board of Directors); |
|
|
|
the expected tax treatment of the merger and the receipt by the
EMJ stockholders of the merger consideration; |
|
|
|
the expected impact of the transaction on the EMJ employees; |
|
|
|
the fact that, subject to compliance with the terms and
conditions of the merger agreement, EMJ is permitted, prior to
stockholder approval, to furnish information to and conduct
negotiations with third parties that make a takeover proposal; |
51
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that, subject to compliance with the terms and
conditions of the merger agreement, EMJ is permitted to
terminate the merger agreement, prior to stockholder approval,
in order to approve an alternative transaction proposed by a
third party that is a superior proposal, upon the payment to
Reliance of an approximately $20.5 million termination fee
(representing approximately 3% of the total equity value of EMJ)
(see The Merger Agreement Termination of the
Merger Agreement); |
|
|
|
the fact that the voting agreement between Reliance and the
Kelso Funds terminates if EMJs board of directors
withdraws or adversely modifies its recommendation of the merger
(see The Voting Agreement); |
|
|
|
the availability of appraisal rights to holders of EMJ common
stock who comply with all of the required procedures under
Delaware law, which allow such holders to seek appraisal of the
fair value of their shares as determined by the Delaware Court
of Chancery (see Dissenters Rights of
Appraisal and Annex E); and |
|
|
|
EMJs board of directors understanding, after
consultation with its professional advisors, that both the
approximately $20.5 million termination fee and the
circumstances when such fee is payable, are reasonable and
customary in light of the benefits of the merger, commercial
practice and transactions of this size and nature. |
EMJs board of directors also considered potential risks
associated with the merger in connection with its deliberations
of the proposed transaction. These risks included the
possibility that the voting agreement, the non-solicitation
provisions of the merger agreement and the termination fee could
have the effect of discouraging other parties potentially
interested in a transaction with EMJ from proposing a
transaction, risks relating to the Reliance business, risks
relating to Reliances ability to successfully integrate
the EMJ business and realize the benefits of the merger, the
need to obtain EMJ stockholder and regulatory approvals in order
to complete the transaction; and the risks to EMJ if the merger
does not close, including the diversion of management and
employee attention, possible customer, vendor, employee and
other relationship attrition and resultant possible revenue
loss, relating to various aspects of EMJs business.
EMJs board of directors considered all the factors
outlined above, as well as these risks, as a whole, and overall
considered them on balance to be favorable to, and to support,
its determination.
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors
considered by EMJs board of directors is not exhaustive,
but includes the material factors considered by EMJs board
of directors. In view of the wide variety of factors considered
by EMJs board of directors in connection with its
evaluation of the merger and the complexity of these matters,
EMJs board of directors did not consider it practical to,
nor did it attempt to, quantify, rank or otherwise assign
relative weights to the specific factors that it considered in
reaching its decision. EMJs board of directors evaluated
the factors described above, including by asking questions of
EMJ management and EMJ legal and financial advisors, and reached
consensus that the merger was in the best interests of EMJ and
the EMJ stockholders. In considering the factors described
above, individual members of EMJs board of directors may
have given different weights to different factors.
Recommendation of EMJs Board of Directors
EMJs board of directors determined that the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement, including the merger, are advisable and in the best
interests of EMJ and its stockholders. Accordingly, EMJs
board of directors unanimously approved the merger and the
merger agreement and unanimously recommends that EMJ
stockholders vote FOR adoption and approval of the
merger agreement.
Opinion of Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC to
EMJs Board of Directors
Credit Suisse has acted as financial advisor to EMJ in
connection with the merger.
In connection with the engagement of Credit Suisse, EMJs
board of directors requested that Credit Suisse evaluate the
fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of EMJ
common stock (other
52
than Reliance and its subsidiaries and the Kelso Funds and their
respective affiliates), of the merger consideration to be
received by those stockholders pursuant to the merger. On
January 17, 2006, at a meeting of EMJs board of
directors held to evaluate the merger, Credit Suisse delivered
to such board of directors an oral opinion, which opinion was
confirmed by delivery of a written opinion dated the same date,
to the effect that, as of that date and based on and subject to
the matters described in its opinion, the merger consideration
to be received pursuant to the merger was fair, from a financial
point of view, to the holders of EMJ common stock (other than
Reliance and its subsidiaries and the Kelso Funds and their
respective affiliates).
The full text of Credit Suisses written opinion to
EMJs board of directors, dated January 17, 2006,
which sets forth the procedures followed, assumptions made,
matters considered and limitations of the review undertaken, is
included as Annex C to this proxy statement/ prospectus and
is incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/
prospectus. Holders of EMJ common stock are encouraged to read
this opinion carefully and in its entirety. Credit Suisses
opinion was provided to EMJs board of directors in
connection with its evaluation of the merger consideration and
relates only to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of
the merger consideration to be received by the holders of EMJ
common stock (other than Reliance and its subsidiaries and the
Kelso Funds and their respective affiliates), and does not
address any other aspect or implication of the merger or any
other agreement, arrangement or understanding entered into in
connection with the merger or otherwise, and does not constitute
a recommendation to any stockholder as to how such stockholder
should vote or act with respect to any matter relating to the
proposed merger. The summary of Credit Suisses opinion in
this proxy statement/ prospectus is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the full text of the opinion.
In arriving at its opinion, Credit Suisse reviewed the merger
agreement, certain related agreements and publicly available
business and financial information relating to EMJ and Reliance.
Credit Suisse also reviewed other information relating to EMJ
and Reliance, including financial forecasts provided to or
discussed with Credit Suisse by the managements of EMJ and
Reliance, and met with the managements of EMJ and Reliance to
discuss the businesses and prospects of EMJ and Reliance. Credit
Suisse also considered certain financial and stock market data
of EMJ and Reliance, and compared that data with similar data
for other publicly held companies in businesses Credit Suisse
deemed similar to those of EMJ and Reliance and considered, to
the extent publicly available, the financial terms of certain
other business combinations and other transactions which have
recently been effected or announced. Credit Suisse also
considered such other information, financial studies, analyses
and investigations and financial, economic and market criteria
that it deemed relevant.
In connection with its review, Credit Suisse did not assume any
responsibility for independent verification of any of the
information that it reviewed or considered and relied on that
information being complete and accurate in all material
respects. With respect to the financial forecasts relating to
EMJ and Reliance that Credit Suisse reviewed, Credit Suisse was
advised by the managements of EMJ and Reliance, and assumed,
that such forecasts were reasonably prepared on bases reflecting
the best currently available estimates and judgments of the
managements of EMJ and Reliance as to the future financial
performance of EMJ and Reliance, respectively. Credit Suisse
also assumed, with EMJs consent, that the merger would
qualify as a reorganization under Section 368(a) of the
Code. Credit Suisse further assumed, with EMJs consent,
that, in the course of obtaining any necessary regulatory or
third party consents, approvals or agreements in connection with
the merger, no modification, delay, limitation, restriction or
condition will be imposed that would have an adverse effect on
EMJ, Reliance or the contemplated benefits of the merger and
that the merger would be consummated in accordance with the
terms of the merger agreement without waiver, modification or
amendment of any material term, condition or agreement thereof.
In addition, Credit Suisse was not requested to make, and it did
not make, an independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets
or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of EMJ or Reliance, nor
was Credit Suisse furnished with any evaluations or appraisals.
Credit Suisses opinion was necessarily based on
information available to it, and financial, economic, market and
other conditions as they existed and could be evaluated, on the
date of Credit Suisses opinion. Credit Suisse did not
express any opinion as to what the actual value of Reliance
common stock will be when issued to holders of EMJ
53
common stock pursuant to the merger or the prices at which
Reliance common stock will trade at any time. Credit
Suisses opinion did not address the relative merits of the
merger as compared to other business strategies or transactions
that might be available to EMJ or EMJs underlying business
decision to proceed with the merger.
In preparing its opinion to EMJs board of directors,
Credit Suisse performed a variety of financial and comparative
analyses, including those described below. The summary of Credit
Suisses analyses described below is not a complete
description of the analyses underlying its opinion. The
preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process involving
various determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant
methods of financial analysis and the application of those
methods to the particular circumstances and, therefore, a
fairness opinion is not readily susceptible to partial analysis
or summary description. In arriving at its opinion, Credit
Suisse made qualitative judgments as to the significance and
relevance of each analysis and factor that it considered. Credit
Suisse arrived at its ultimate opinion based on the results of
all analyses undertaken by it and assessed as a whole and did
not draw, in isolation, conclusions from or with regard to any
one factor or method of analysis. Accordingly, Credit Suisse
believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole and
that selecting portions of its analyses and factors or focusing
on information presented in tabular format, without considering
all analyses and factors or the narrative description of the
analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of the
processes underlying its analyses and opinion.
In its analyses, Credit Suisse considered industry performance,
general business, economic, market and financial conditions and
other matters, many of which are beyond the control of EMJ and
Reliance. No company, transaction or business used in Credit
Suisses analyses as a comparison is identical to EMJ,
Reliance or the proposed merger, and an evaluation of the
results of those analyses is not entirely mathematical. Rather,
the analyses involve complex considerations and judgments
concerning financial and operating characteristics and other
factors that could affect the acquisition, public trading or
other values of the companies, business segments or transactions
analyzed. The estimates contained in Credit Suisses
analyses and the ranges of valuations resulting from any
particular analysis are not necessarily indicative of actual
values or predictive of future results or values, which may be
significantly more or less favorable than those suggested by the
analyses. In addition, analyses relating to the value of
businesses or securities do not purport to be appraisals or to
reflect the prices at which businesses or securities actually
may be sold. Accordingly, the estimates used in, and the results
derived from, Credit Suisses analyses are inherently
subject to substantial uncertainty.
Credit Suisses opinion and financial analyses were only
one of many factors considered by EMJs board of directors
in its evaluation of the proposed merger and should not be
viewed as determinative of the views of EMJs board of
directors or management with respect to the merger or the merger
consideration. Although Credit Suisse evaluated the merger
consideration from a financial point of view, it was not
requested to, and did not, determine or recommend the specific
consideration to be paid in the transaction.
|
|
|
Analyses performed in Connection with the Preparation of
the Fairness Opinion by Credit Suisse |
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses
Credit Suisse presented to EMJs board of directors on
January 17, 2006, in connection with the merger. The
financial analyses summarized below include information
presented in tabular format. In order to fully understand Credit
Suisses financial analyses, the tables must be read
together with the text of each summary. The tables alone do not
constitute a complete description of the financial analyses.
Considering the data in the tables below without considering the
full narrative description of the financial analyses, including
the methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could
create a misleading or incomplete view of Credit Suisses
financial analyses.
54
|
|
|
Selected Companies Analysis |
Using publicly available information, Credit Suisse reviewed the
market values and trading multiples of the following publicly
traded North American metals service center companies:
|
|
|
North American Metals Service Center Companies |
|
|
|
|
|
Russel Metals Inc.
|
|
|
Ryerson Inc.
|
|
|
A.M. Castle & Co.
|
|
|
Novamerican Steel Inc.
|
|
|
Olympic Steel, Inc.
|
|
|
Multiples were based on closing stock prices on January 11,
2006. Estimated data for the selected companies were based on
publicly available research analysts estimates and public
filings. Credit Suisse compared enterprise values, calculated as
equity value plus net debt, as multiples of calendar years 2005
and 2006 estimated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation
and amortization, commonly referred to as EBITDA. Credit Suisse
also compared equity values per share as multiples of calendar
years 2005 and 2006 estimated earnings per share. Credit Suisse
then applied a range of selected multiples described above for
the selected companies to corresponding financial data of EMJ.
Estimated data for EMJ were based on internal estimates of
EMJs management. This analysis indicated the following
approximate implied per share equity reference range for EMJ, as
compared to the merger consideration:
|
|
|
Implied per Share Equity |
|
|
Reference Range for EMJ |
|
Merger Consideration |
|
|
|
$12.27 $15.04 |
|
$13.00 |
|
|
|
Selected Transactions Analysis |
Using publicly available information, Credit Suisse reviewed
information relating to the following selected acquisitions and
announced offers to acquire, which Credit Suisse deemed relevant
to arriving at its opinion:
|
|
|
Acquiror |
|
Target |
|
|
|
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
|
|
Chapel Steel Corp. |
Apollo Management, L.P.
|
|
Metals USA, Inc. |
Ryerson Inc.
|
|
Integris Metals (Alcoa/BHP-B) |
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
|
|
Precision Strip, Inc. |
Russel Metals Inc.
|
|
Acier Leroux Inc. |
Samuel, Son & Co.
|
|
Renown Steel (Slater Steel) |
Balli Group plc
|
|
Klöckner & Co. (E.ON AG) |
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
|
|
PittDes Moines (Steel Service Center Division) |
Multiples for the selected transactions were based on publicly
available financial information at the time of announcement of
the relevant transaction. Credit Suisse compared enterprise
values in the selected transactions as multiples of the latest
12 months revenue and EBITDA. Credit Suisse then applied
ranges of selected multiples derived from the selected
transactions to corresponding financial data of EMJ. Estimated
data for EMJ were based on internal estimates of EMJs
management. This analysis indicated the following implied per
share equity reference range for EMJ, as compared to the merger
consideration:
|
|
|
Implied per Share Equity |
|
|
Reference Range for EMJ |
|
Merger Consideration |
|
|
|
$10.85 $13.59 |
|
$13.00 |
55
|
|
|
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis |
Credit Suisse calculated the estimated present value of the
stand-alone, unlevered, after-tax free cash flows that EMJ could
generate over calendar years 2006 through 2010 and the
enterprise value of EMJ at the end of that period. Estimated
financial data for EMJ were based on internal estimates of
EMJs management. Credit Suisse also calculated a range of
estimated terminal values (estimated value of future cash flow
from an asset at a particular point in time in the future) for
EMJ by multiplying EMJs calendar year 2010 estimated
EBITDA by selected multiples ranging from 5.00x to 6.50x. The
estimated after-tax free cash flows and terminal values were
then discounted to the present value using discount rates of
12.5% to 13.5%. This analysis indicated the following
approximate implied per share equity reference range for EMJ, as
compared to the merger consideration:
|
|
|
Implied per Share Equity |
|
|
Reference Range for EMJ |
|
Merger Consideration |
|
|
|
$11.53 $14.86 |
|
$13.00 |
|
|
|
Selected Companies Analysis |
Using publicly available information, Credit Suisse reviewed the
market values and trading multiples of North American metals
service center companies referenced above under the heading
EMJ Analyses Selected Companies
Analysis. Multiples were based on closing stock prices on
January 11, 2006. Estimated data for the selected companies
were based on publicly available research analysts
estimates and public filings. Credit Suisse compared enterprise
values as multiples of calendar years 2005 and 2006 estimated
EBITDA. Credit Suisse also compared equity values per share as
multiples of calendar years 2005 and 2006 estimated earnings per
share. Credit Suisse then applied a range of selected multiples
described above for the selected companies to corresponding
financial data of Reliance. Estimated data for Reliance were
based on internal estimates of Reliances management. This
analysis indicated the following approximate implied per share
equity reference range for Reliance, as compared to the closing
price of Reliance common stock on January 11, 2006:
|
|
|
Implied per Share Equity |
|
Closing Price of Reliance |
Reference Range for Reliance |
|
Common Stock on January 11, 2006 |
|
|
|
$63.37 $77.81 |
|
$65.49 |
|
|
|
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis |
Credit Suisse calculated the estimated present value of the
stand-alone, unlevered, after-tax free cash flows that Reliance
could generate over calendar years 2006 through 2008 and the
enterprise value of Reliance at the end of that period.
Estimated financial data for Reliance were based on internal
estimates of Reliances management. Credit Suisse also
calculated a range of estimated terminal values for Reliance by
multiplying Reliances calendar year 2008 estimated EBITDA
by selected multiples ranging from 6.50x to 7.50x. The estimated
after-tax free cash flows and terminal values were then
discounted to the present value using discount rates of 11.5% to
12.5%. This analysis indicated the following approximate implied
per share equity reference range for Reliance, as compared to
the closing price of Reliance common stock on January 11,
2006:
|
|
|
Implied per Share Equity |
|
Closing Price of Reliance |
Reference Range for Reliance |
|
Common Stock on January 11, 2006 |
|
|
|
$55.55 $65.48 |
|
$65.49 |
EMJ selected Credit Suisse based on Credit Suisses
experience and reputation, and its familiarity with EMJ and its
business. Credit Suisse is an internationally recognized
investment banking firm and is regularly engaged in the
valuation of businesses and securities in connection with
mergers and acquisitions,
56
leveraged buyouts, negotiated underwritings, competitive
biddings, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted
securities, private placements and valuations for corporate and
other purposes.
EMJ has agreed to pay Credit Suisse customary fees for its
financial advisory services in connection with the merger, a
significant portion of which is contingent upon completion of
the merger. EMJ also has agreed to reimburse Credit Suisse for
its expenses, including reasonable fees and expenses of legal
counsel and any other advisor retained by Credit Suisse, and to
indemnify Credit Suisse and related parties against liabilities,
including liabilities under the federal securities laws, arising
out of its engagement.
Credit Suisse and its affiliates in the past have provided, are
currently providing, and in the future may provide, investment
banking and other financial services to EMJ, Reliance, the
private investment firms whose affiliates are EMJ stockholders,
and their respective affiliates (including having acted as
co-lead underwriter in connection with EMJs initial public
offering in April 2005), unrelated to the proposed merger, for
which services Credit Suisse and its affiliates have received,
and would expect to receive, compensation. Credit Suisse is a
full service securities firm, engaged in securities trading and
brokerage activities as well as providing investment banking and
other financial services. In the ordinary course of business,
Credit Suisse and its affiliates may acquire, hold or sell, for
its or its affiliates own accounts and the accounts of
customers, equity, debt and other securities and financial
instruments (including bank loans and other obligations) of EMJ,
Reliance and any other company that may be involved in the
merger and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short
position in such securities, as well as provide investment
banking and other financial services to such companies. In
addition, funds managed or advised by Credit Suisse or one or
more of its affiliates have investments in funds managed or
advised by affiliates of certain EMJ stockholders, including
Kelso Investment Associates IV, L.P.
Opinion of Duff & Phelps Securities, LLC to
EMJs Board of Directors
On December 14, 2005, EMJs board of directors
retained Duff & Phelps to provide financial advisory
services with respect to the merger and to render an opinion as
to the fairness of the merger, from a financial point of view,
to EMJs stockholders other than Reliance, the Kelso Funds,
and their respective subsidiaries and affiliates. On
January 13, 2006, Duff & Phelps delivered a draft
written presentation to EMJs board of directors regarding
its fairness analysis. On January 17, 2006, Duff &
Phelps participated in a meeting and conference call with the
board of directors to discuss its previously transmitted written
presentation and to answer any questions regarding its analysis
and conclusions. Additionally, on January 17, 2006,
Duff & Phelps delivered its final presentation and
written opinion letter to the board of directors stating, in
part, that as of January 17, 2006, and based upon and
subject to the factors and assumptions set forth in its opinion,
the merger was fair to the EMJ stockholders, other than the
excluded persons.
The full text of Duff & Phelps opinion, dated as
of January 17, 2006, which is attached as Annex D to
this proxy statement/ prospectus, sets forth, among other
things, the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters
considered, and limitations of the review undertaken by
Duff & Phelps, which are described below. You are urged
to, and should, read Duff & Phelps opinion
carefully and in its entirety.
In connection with its opinion, Duff & Phelps made such
reviews, analyses and inquiries, as it deemed necessary and
appropriate under the circumstances. Duff &
Phelps due diligence with regard to the merger included,
but was not limited to, the items summarized below.
|
|
|
|
|
Attended a due diligence meeting with individuals from: |
|
|
|
|
|
EMJ and Reliance management; |
|
|
|
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, legal counsel to EMJ; |
|
|
|
Credit Suisse; and |
|
|
|
UBS Securities LLC, financial advisor to Reliance. |
|
|
|
|
|
Held additional discussions with EMJ management. |
57
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewed a draft of the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated
January 16, 2006. |
|
|
|
Reviewed a draft of the Voting Agreement dated January 13,
2006. |
|
|
|
Reviewed EMJs financial statements and projections,
including: |
|
|
|
|
|
Annual reports on
Form 10-K for the
fiscal years ended March 31, 2002 through 2005; |
|
|
|
Quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q for the
six-month periods ended September 29, 2004 and
September 28, 2005; |
|
|
|
Internal financial reports for the eight months ended
November 30, 2005; and |
|
|
|
Financial projections prepared by EMJ management for the last
quarter of fiscal 2006 and for the fiscal years ended
March 31, 2007 through 2011. |
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewed Reliances financial statements and projections,
including: |
|
|
|
|
|
Annual reports on
Form 10-K for the
fiscal years ended December 31, 2002 through 2004; |
|
|
|
Quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q for the
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and
2005; and |
|
|
|
Financial projections prepared by Reliance management for the
fiscal years ended December 31, 2005 through 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewed other operating, financial and legal information
regarding EMJ and Reliance. |
|
|
|
Reviewed and analyzed market trading prices and indicated
valuation metrics for EMJ and Reliance. |
|
|
|
Reviewed and analyzed market trading prices and indicated
valuation metrics for comparable public companies. |
|
|
|
Reviewed and analyzed valuation metrics and premiums paid in
comparable merger transactions. |
|
|
|
Reviewed pertinent economic and industry information. |
|
|
|
Reviewed and prepared other studies, analyses and investigations
as we deemed appropriate. |
Duff & Phelps also took into account its assessment of
general economic, market and financial conditions, and its
experience in securities and business valuation, in general, and
with respect to transactions similar to the proposed merger. In
particular, Duff & Phelps did not make any independent
evaluation, appraisal or physical inspection of EMJs
solvency or of any specific assets or liabilities (contingent or
otherwise). Duff & Phelps opinion should not be
construed as a credit rating, solvency opinion, an analysis of
EMJs credit worthiness or otherwise as tax advice or as
accounting advice. In rendering its opinion, Duff &
Phelps relied upon the fact that EMJs board of directors
and EMJ have been advised by counsel as to all legal matters
with respect to the merger, including whether all procedures
required by law to be taken in connection with the merger have
been duly, validly and timely taken and Duff & Phelps
did not make, and assumes no responsibility to make, any
representation, or render any opinion, as to any legal matter.
In preparing its forecasts, performing its analysis and
rendering its opinion with respect to the merger,
Duff & Phelps: (1) relied upon the accuracy,
completeness, and fair presentation of all information, data,
advice, opinions and representations obtained from public
sources or provided to it from private sources, including EMJ
and Reliance management, and did not attempt to independently
verify such information, (2) assumed that any estimates,
evaluations and projections furnished to Duff & Phelps
were reasonably prepared and based upon the last currently
available information and good faith judgment of the person
furnishing the same and (3) assumed that the final versions
of all documents reviewed by them in draft form conform in all
material respects to the drafts reviewed. Duff &
Phelps opinion further assumes that information supplied
and representations made by EMJ and Reliance management are
substantially accurate regarding EMJ, Reliance and the merger.
Neither EMJ management nor EMJs board of
58
directors placed any limitations upon Duff & Phelps
with respect to the procedures followed or factors considered by
Duff & Phelps in rendering its opinion.
In its analysis and in connection with the preparation of its
opinion, Duff & Phelps made numerous assumptions with
respect to industry performance, general business, market and
economic conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond
the control of any party involved in the merger. Duff &
Phelps has also assumed that all of the conditions precedent
required to implement the merger will be satisfied and that the
merger will be completed in accordance with the merger agreement
that was provided for its review.
The basis and methodology for Duff & Phelps
opinion have been designed specifically for the express purposes
of EMJs board of directors and may not translate to any
other purposes.
To the extent that any of the foregoing assumptions or any of
the facts on which Duff & Phelps opinion is based
proves to be untrue in any material respect, its opinion cannot
and should not be relied upon.
Duff & Phelps prepared its opinion effective as of
January 17, 2006. The opinion is necessarily based upon
market, economic, financial and other conditions as they existed
and could be evaluated as of such date, and Duff &
Phelps disclaims any undertaking or obligation to advise any
person of any change in any fact or matter affecting the opinion
which may come or be brought to the attention of Duff &
Phelps after such date.
Duff & Phelps opinion should not be construed as
creating any fiduciary duty on Duff & Phelps part
to any party.
Duff & Phelps opinion is not a recommendation as
to how any stockholder should vote or act with respect to any
matters relating to the merger, or whether to proceed with the
merger or any related transaction, nor does it indicate that the
consideration received is the best possible attainable under any
circumstances. The decision as to whether to proceed with the
merger or any related transaction may depend on an assessment of
factors unrelated to the financial analysis on which
Duff & Phelps opinion is based. As a result, the
opinion and presentation of Duff & Phelps was only one
of many factors taken into consideration by EMJs board of
directors in making its determination with respect to the merger.
The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process and
is not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary
description. In addition, the process of preparing a fairness
opinion necessarily requires a broad range of subjective
judgments with respect to appropriate comparable companies,
appropriate multiples of various selected financial data,
appropriate discount rates and other financial and other
factors. Analyses and estimates of the values of companies do
not purport to be appraisals or necessarily reflect the prices
at which companies or their securities may actually be sold.
In preparing its opinion, Duff & Phelps performed
certain financial and comparative analyses summarized in the
following paragraphs. Duff & Phelps believes that its
analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting
portions of such analyses and the factors it considered, without
considering all such analyses and factors, could create an
incomplete view of the analyses and the process underlying its
opinion. While the conclusions reached in connection with each
analysis were considered carefully by Duff & Phelps in
arriving at its opinion, Duff & Phelps made various
subjective judgments in arriving at its opinion and did not
consider it practicable to, nor did it attempt to, assign
relative weights to the individual analyses and specific factors
considered in reaching its opinion. Although these paragraphs
include some information in tabular format, those tables are not
intended to stand alone, and must be read together with the full
text of each summary and the limitations and qualifications in
the opinion.
Duff & Phelps analysis was comprised of the
following components: (1) an analysis of the merger
structure and the consideration to be received by the EMJ
stockholders, (2) an analysis of historical market trading
prices and volume for EMJ and Reliance common stock, (3) a
fundamental valuation analysis of EMJ common stock, (4) a
fundamental valuation analysis of Reliance common stock,
(5) a
59
fundamental valuation analysis of the post-transaction combined
company and (6) a premiums paid analysis.
|
|
|
Analysis of Merger Structure and Consideration |
Duff & Phelps estimated the total equity value of the
merger, including the purchase of outstanding common stock,
Reliances guarantee of the special contribution
obligation, the cash payment for certain EMJ options, and the
assumption of the remaining EMJ options, at approximately
$696 million. After including the value of debt assumed,
net of cash and the cash surrender value of the company owned
life insurance, or COLI, Duff & Phelps estimated the
total enterprise value of the merger at approximately
$944 million. These figures were then used by
Duff & Phelps to calculate implied valuation multiples
as discussed below.
In addition, Duff & Phelps observed that the collar
provided EMJ stockholders with a certain amount of protection
against movements in the price of Reliance stock, and that
movements in Reliances stock price above or below the
bounds of the collar would result in an increase or decrease,
respectively, in the total value of consideration to be received
and the amount of the premium over EMJs pre-announcement
trading price.
Duff & Phelps reviewed the historical trading prices
and volume of EMJ stock since its initial public offering in
April 2005. In particular, Duff & Phelps observed that
EMJ stock did not have a high level of liquidity, with daily
trading averaging approximately 90,000 shares per day over
the 90 days preceding its analysis, or only 0.2% of total
shares outstanding and 0.5% of the public float. Duff &
Phelps also observed that, since its initial public offering
date, EMJ shares had traded in a range of $6.70 to
$10.69 per share, and that the $13.00 per share
purchase price was well in excess of EMJs historical
trading range.
With respect to Reliance, Duff & Phelps observed that
its stock was substantially more liquid than EMJs, with
average daily trading of approximately 301,000 shares
during the 90 days preceding its analysis, representing
0.9% of shares outstanding and 1.1% of Reliances public
float. Duff & Phelps also observed that Reliances
stock price had increased significantly since July 2005,
reaching an all-time high of $67.06 on January 10, 2006.
However, Duff & Phelps also noted that the increased
stock price between July 2005 and January 2006 was generally in
line with the trading pattern of a market value weighted index
of steel service center stocks identified by Duff &
Phelps and that, even with the substantial increase over the
last six months, Reliance stock had actually underperformed the
aforementioned index over the past three years.
|
|
|
Market Valuation Multiples |
Duff & Phelps next presented an analysis of valuation
multiples as indicated by a group of selected comparable
companies, and also as indicated by a group of identified steel
industry merger and acquisition transactions.
Comparable Public Company Analysis. Duff &
Phelps comparable company analysis was based on a selected
group of comparable public companies. No company used in this
analysis is identical to EMJ or Reliance, and, accordingly, a
comparable company analysis involves complex and subjective
considerations and judgments concerning differences in financial
and operating characteristics of businesses and other factors
that affect trading prices of the various companies being
compared.
In the selection of comparable public companies, Duff &
Phelps used multiple databases to identify public companies that
are the most similar to EMJ and Reliance from an investment
perspective. The public companies selected by Duff &
Phelps generally have similar product lines, customer bases or
other business attributes which would cause an investor to group
these companies in the same broad industry
60
class for investment purposes. Duff & Phelps ultimately
included the 12 companies listed below in the comparison
group based on their investment risks, products and services
offered and target markets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.M. Castle Co.
Olympic Steel Inc.
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. |
|
Russel Metals Inc.
Ryerson Inc.
Commercial Metals Co. |
|
Friedman Industries Inc.
Gibraltar Industries Inc.
Novamerican Steel Inc. |
|
Quanex Corp.
Steel Technologies Inc.
Worthington Industries Inc. |
Based on publicly reported financial data as well as published
earnings estimates for each of the selected comparable
companies, Duff & Phelps analyzed certain valuation
metrics, which are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Value as a Multiple of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Price as a | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multiple of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
EBITDA | |
|
EBIT | |
|
|
|
|
Equity | |
|
Enterprise | |
|
LTM | |
|
LTM | |
|
Proj. | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
LTM | |
|
|
Value | |
|
Value | |
|
Revs. | |
|
EPS | |
|
EPS | |
|
LTM | |
|
Proj. | |
|
LTM | |
|
Proj. | |
|
Revs. | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(All $ in millions valuations based on 1/13/06 closing prices) | |
High
|
|
$ |
2,451 |
|
|
$ |
2,918 |
|
|
$ |
6,573 |
|
|
|
14.7x |
|
|
|
14.3x |
|
|
|
8.1x |
|
|
|
7.9x |
|
|
|
10.4x |
|
|
|
9.6x |
|
|
|
0.87x |
|
Low
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
183 |
|
|
|
8.0x |
|
|
|
7.1x |
|
|
|
4.0x |
|
|
|
4.8x |
|
|
|
4.5x |
|
|
|
6.0x |
|
|
|
0.21x |
|
Mean
|
|
$ |
970 |
|
|
$ |
1,211 |
|
|
$ |
2,318 |
|
|
|
10.2x |
|
|
|
11.2x |
|
|
|
6.0x |
|
|
|
6.0x |
|
|
|
7.0x |
|
|
|
8.0x |
|
|
|
0.51x |
|
Median
|
|
$ |
699 |
|
|
$ |
1,173 |
|
|
$ |
1,548 |
|
|
|
9.3x |
|
|
|
11.5x |
|
|
|
5.8x |
|
|
|
5.8x |
|
|
|
6.7x |
|
|
|
7.8x |
|
|
|
0.50x |
|
LTM = Latest 12 months
EBITDA = Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization
EBIT = Earnings before interest and taxes
Enterprise Value = Stock price times shares outstanding plus
preferred stock, minority interest and interest-bearing debt
minus cash and equivalents
All earnings measures were adjusted for special items.
Comparable Transaction Analysis. Similar to the
comparable public company analysis, Duff & Phelps used
multiple databases and resources to identify comparable
controlling interest transactions involving companies with
similar product lines, customers or other business attributes.
Duff & Phelps identified relevant transactions that
were announced during the past three years and for which
adequate information was available to derive meaningful
valuation multiples. The 12 identified transactions are listed
below:
|
|
|
|
Target |
|
Buyer |
|
Dofasco,
Inc.(1)
|
|
ThyssenKrupp AG |
Roanoke Electric Steel
Corp.(1)
|
|
Steel Dynamics, Inc. |
Alabama Metal Industries Corp.
|
|
Gibraltar Industries, Inc. |
Chapel Steel Corp.
|
|
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. |
Metals USA, Inc.
|
|
Apollo Advisors LP |
Harvest Partners, Inc./Edgen Corp.
|
|
Jefferies Group, Inc. |
Integris Metals Corp.
|
|
Ryerson Inc. |
International Steel Group, Inc.
|
|
Ispat International NV |
Commonwealth Industries, Inc.
|
|
IMCO Recycling, Inc. |
Arcelor SA/J&F Steel LLC
|
|
Ryerson Inc. |
Precision Strip Inc.
|
|
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. |
Leroux Steel Inc.
|
|
Russel Metals Inc. |
61
Based on reported pricing and financial data regarding the
identified transactions, Duff & Phelps analyzed certain
valuation metrics, which are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(all $ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Enterprise Value as a | |
|
|
Multiple of | |
|
|
Enterprise | |
|
| |
|
|
Value | |
|
Sales | |
|
EBITDA | |
|
EBIT | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
High
|
|
$ |
4,200 |
|
|
|
2.02x |
|
|
|
8.9x |
|
|
|
13.9x |
|
Low
|
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
|
0.16x |
|
|
|
3.4x |
|
|
|
3.7x |
|
Mean
|
|
$ |
932 |
|
|
|
0.63x |
|
|
|
5.7x |
|
|
|
7.6x |
|
Median
|
|
$ |
243 |
|
|
|
0.47x |
|
|
|
5.2x |
|
|
|
6.9x |
|
|
|
|
Fundamental Valuation Analysis of EMJ |
Duff & Phelps valuation analysis of EMJ common
stock was based on: (1) a discounted cash flow analysis,
and (2) a calculation of the valuation multiples implied by
the merger pricing and a comparison of such implied multiples
with the comparable public company multiples and the comparable
transaction multiples summarized above.
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. Duff & Phelps
performed a discounted cash flow analysis to derive indications
of total enterprise value and equity value. A discounted cash
flow analysis is designed to provide insight into the intrinsic
value of a business based on its projected earnings and capital
requirements as well as the net present value of projected
debt-free cash flows. Duff & Phelps based its
discounted cash flow analysis on projections of debt-free cash
flows of EMJ for the last quarter of fiscal 2006 and the fiscal
years ending March 31, 2007 through 2011. These projections
were prepared by EMJ management and were not independently
verified by Duff & Phelps. In its analysis,
Duff & Phelps used discount rates ranging from 12.5% to
13.5% to reflect the overall risk associated with EMJs
operations and projected financial performance. Duff &
Phelps calculated a terminal value at the end of 2011 using two
methods: a constant growth dividend discount model, which
incorporated a range of perpetuity growth rates from 1.5% to
2.5%, and the capitalization of EBITDA method using an EBITDA
multiple in the range of 4.5x to 5.5x.
Based on its discounted cash flow analysis, Duff &
Phelps estimated total enterprise value ranging from
$795 million to $930 million. From its estimated
enterprise value, Duff & Phelps then deducted
EMJs debt net of cash and the cash surrender
value of the COLI and the value of outstanding stock
options, to arrive at a fully diluted equity value ranging from
$520 million to $646 million. Finally, dividing its
concluded fully diluted common equity value by
50.96 million common shares (including the special
contribution shares) resulted in rounded values ranging from
$10.00 per share to $13.00 per share, as compared with
the merger price of $13.00 per share.
Implied Transaction Multiples. Based on its estimates of
total equity value and total enterprise value under the terms of
the merger, as set forth above, Duff & Phelps
calculated the implied valuation multiples for the merger. In
calculating its implied valuation multiples, Duff &
Phelps adjusted EMJs historical and projected financial
results to remove the effect of extraordinary and non-recurring
items, as well as any financial statement effects of the COLI.
Duff & Phelps then compared the implied valuation
62
multiples with the median valuation multiples indicated by the
comparable public companies and the comparable transactions. The
results of Duff & Phelps analysis are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Enterprise Value as Multiple of | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Revenues | |
|
EBITDA | |
|
EBIT | |
|
Equity Value/ | |
|
|
|
|
Net ncome | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
EMJ Implied Multiples
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTM 9/28/05
|
|
|
0.55x |
|
|
|
5.6x |
|
|
|
6.1x |
|
|
|
9.7x |
|
|
Projected FYE March 2006
|
|
|
0.54x |
|
|
|
5.3x |
|
|
|
5.6x |
|
|
|
8.3x |
|
|
Projected FYE March 2007
|
|
|
0.55x |
|
|
|
5.2x |
|
|
|
5.6x |
|
|
|
8.2x |
|
Comparable Public Companies Median Multiples
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LTM
|
|
|
0.50x |
|
|
|
5.8x |
|
|
|
6.7x |
|
|
|
9.3x |
|
|
Projected Next Fiscal Year
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
5.8x |
|
|
|
7.8x |
|
|
|
11.5x |
|
Comparable Transactions Median Multiples
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latest Available Financial Results
|
|
|
0.47x |
|
|
|
5.2x |
|
|
|
6.9x |
|
|
|
NA |
|
Duff & Phelps observed that the implied multiples of
enterprise value to revenue, for trailing performance and
projected performance are above the indicated median multiples
for the comparable public companies and the comparable
transactions for each period. With respect to the multiples of
enterprise value to EBITDA, EMJs implied multiples on a
trailing and projected basis are at or above the median multiple
for the identified transactions and slightly below the median
multiples for the comparable public companies. Duff &
Phelps further observed that, while the implied multiples of
EBIT are below those of the comparable companies and identified
transactions, the implied multiple of trailing 12 month net
income was above the median for the comparable companies. Based
on these observations, and taken as a whole, Duff &
Phelps determined that the valuation multiples implied by the
merger price supported a determination of fairness.
|
|
|
Fundamental Valuation Analysis of Reliance |
As with EMJ, Duff & Phelps valuation analysis of
Reliance was based on: (1) a discounted cash flow analysis
and (2) a comparison of Reliances market-derived
valuation multiples with the comparable public company multiples
summarized above.
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. Duff & Phelps
based its discounted cash flow analysis on projections of
debt-free cash flows of Reliance for the fiscal years ending
December 31, 2006 through 2008. These projections were
prepared by Reliance management and were not independently
verified by Duff & Phelps. In its analysis,
Duff & Phelps used discount rates ranging from 10.0% to
11.0% to reflect the overall risk associated with
Reliances operations and projected financial performance.
Duff & Phelps calculated a terminal value at the end of
2008 using two methods: a constant growth dividend discount
model, which incorporated a range of perpetuity growth rates
from 2.5% to 3.5%, and the capitalization of EBITDA method using
an EBITDA multiple in the range of 6.5x to 7.5x. Duff &
Phelps used lower discount rates and higher terminal value
assumptions as compared with its analysis of EMJ to reflect the
stronger history of long-term growth and steady profitability as
well as the higher market valuation multiples at which Reliance
normally trades relative to its peers.
Based on its discounted cash flow analysis Duff &
Phelps estimated a total enterprise value of $2.27 billion
to $2.76 billion. From its estimated enterprise value,
Duff & Phelps then deducted Reliances debt, net
of cash, and the value of outstanding stock options, to arrive
at a fully diluted equity value ranging from $1.88 billion
to $2.35 billion. Finally, dividing its concluded fully
diluted common equity value by 33.1 million common shares
resulted in rounded values ranging from $57.00 per share to
$71.00 per share, as compared with Reliances most
recent closing price of $64.80 as of January 13, 2006, the
last full trading day prior to Duff & Phelps
presentation to EMJs board of directors. Duff &
Phelps also observed that the range of values resulting from its
discounted cash flow analysis generally supported the price
range of $53.86 per share to $72.86 per share
comprising the collar.
63
Market Multiples Analysis. As part of its analysis of the
value of Reliance common stock, Duff & Phelps compared
its current market valuation multiples with those of the
selected peer companies. The results of that analysis are
summarized in the table below:
(all $ in millions - valuations based on 1/13/06 closing
prices)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Stock Price as | |
|
|
|
|
a Multiple of | |
|
Enterprise Value as a Multiple of | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
EBITDA | |
|
EBIT | |
|
|
|
|
Equity | |
|
Enterprise | |
|
LTM | |
|
LTM | |
|
Proj. | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
LTM | |
|
|
Value | |
|
Value | |
|
Revs. | |
|
EPS | |
|
EPS | |
|
LTM | |
|
Proj. | |
|
LTM | |
|
Proj. | |
|
Revs. | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Reliance
|
|
$ |
2,144 |
|
|
$ |
2,568 |
|
|
$ |
3,241 |
|
|
|
11.4x |
|
|
|
12.8x |
|
|
|
7.0x |
|
|
|
7.9x |
|
|
|
8.0x |
|
|
|
9.6x |
|
|
|
0.79x |
|
Comparable Public Companies (includes Reliance) |
|
High
|
|
$ |
2,451 |
|
|
$ |
2,918 |
|
|
$ |
6,573 |
|
|
|
14.7x |
|
|
|
14.3x |
|
|
|
8.1x |
|
|
|
7.9x |
|
|
|
10.4x |
|
|
|
9.6x |
|
|
|
0.87x |
|
Low
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
183 |
|
|
|
8.0x |
|
|
|
7.1x |
|
|
|
4.0x |
|
|
|
4.8x |
|
|
|
4.5x |
|
|
|
6.0x |
|
|
|
0.21x |
|
|
Mean
|
|
$ |
970 |
|
|
$ |
1,211 |
|
|
$ |
2,318 |
|
|
|
10.2x |
|
|
|
11.2x |
|
|
|
6.0x |
|
|
|
6.0x |
|
|
|
7.0x |
|
|
|
8.0x |
|
|
|
0.51x |
|
Median
|
|
$ |
699 |
|
|
$ |
1,173 |
|
|
$ |
1,548 |
|
|
|
9.3x |
|
|
|
11.5x |
|
|
|
5.8x |
|
|
|
5.8x |
|
|
|
6.7x |
|
|
|
7.8x |
|
|
|
0.50x |
|
Based on its analysis, Duff & Phelps observed that, by
every metric examined, Reliance was trading at a price that
represented a total valuation above the mean and median and, in
some cases, representing the highest multiple of all of the peer
companies. However, Duff & Phelps also analyzed
historical financial and market trading data and calculated
Reliances EBITDA multiple and
price-to-earnings
multiple as of the end of each calendar quarter for the past ten
years. Duff & Phelps analysis revealed that, as
of the end of 35 out of the last 40 quarters, Reliance traded at
an EBITDA multiple that represented a premium to the industry
median and that, over the
10-year period,
Reliances average quarter-end EBITDA multiple was 8.8x as
compared with the average of 6.6x for the comparable public
companies. Duff & Phelps analysis revealed
similar findings with respect to Reliances
price-to-earnings
multiple, with Reliance trading at a premium as of the end of 34
out of 40 quarters and a
10-year average
multiple of 15.7x as compared with the average of 11.8x for the
comparable public companies. Therefore, Duff & Phelps
concluded that the premium multiple at which Reliance was
trading as of the date of its analysis did not necessarily
indicate that Reliance stock was overvalued in the marketplace.
|
|
|
Fundamental Valuation Analysis of the Post-Transaction
Combined Company |
Duff & Phelps valuation analysis of the
post-transaction combined company was based on: (1) a
discounted cash flow analysis, and (2) an application of
selected valuation multiples to pro forma earnings measures for
the post-transaction combined company.
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. Duff & Phelps
used the fiscal year projections from its analysis of EMJ and
adjusted them to a calendar year basis, and then combined the
adjusted EMJ projection with the financial projections provided
by Reliance management to derive a combined company projection
for calendar 2006 through 2008. As with the stand-alone analysis
of Reliance, Duff & Phelps used discount rates ranging
from 10.0% to 11.0% to reflect the overall risk associated with
the combined companys operations and projected financial
performance. Duff & Phelps calculated a terminal value
at the end of 2008 using two methods: a constant growth dividend
discount model, which incorporated a range of perpetuity growth
rates from 2.5% to 3.5%, and the capitalization of EBITDA method
using an EBITDA multiple in the range of 6.5x to 7.5x. The
discounted cash flow analysis of the post-transaction combined
company resulted in total enterprise value indications ranging
from $3.36 billion to $4.31 billion.
Market Multiples Analysis. Based on actual reported
financial results and the financial projections discussed above,
Duff & Phelps derived pro forma trailing 12 month
and calendar 2006 EBITDA, EBIT
64
and Net Income, and then selected valuation multiples to apply
to each of these measures of income. Duff &
Phelps market multiples analysis is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Range of | |
|
Total Debt | |
|
|
|
Indicated Range | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on Actual Reported | |
|
Financial Results | |
|
and t |
|
he Financial Projections | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
|
Valuation Multiples | |
|
(Net of Cash) | |
|
|
|
of Enterprise Values | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(rounded) | |
EBITDA LTM
|
|
$ |
536,275 |
|
|
x |
|
|
6.50x - 7.50x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
= |
|
$ |
3,486,000 - $4,022,000 |
|
EBITDA Projected 2006
|
|
$ |
557,467 |
|
|
x |
|
|
6.50x - 7.50x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
= |
|
$ |
3,624,000 - $4,181,000 |
|
EBIT LTM
|
|
$ |
478,662 |
|
|
x |
|
|
7.50x - 8.50x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
= |
|
$ |
3,590,000 - $4,069,000 |
|
EBIT Projected 2006
|
|
$ |
500,917 |
|
|
x |
|
|
7.50x - 8.50x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
= |
|
$ |
3,757,000 - $4,258,000 |
|
Net Income LTM
|
|
$ |
256,544 |
|
|
x |
|
|
11.00x - 12.00x |
|
|
|
954,695 |
|
|
= |
|
$ |
3,777,000 - $4,033,000 |
|
Net Income Projected 2006
|
|
$ |
273,121 |
|
|
x |
|
|
10.50x - 11.50x |
|
|
|
954,695 |
|
|
= |
|
$ |
3,822,000 - $4,096,000 |
|
Valuation Conclusion. As outlined above, the
Duff & Phelps market multiples analysis resulted
in an indicated range of enterprise values from
$3.49 billion to $4.26 billion. Combining the results
of the market multiples analysis with the discounted cash flow
analysis, Duff & Phelps concluded that a range of
$3.36 billion to $4.07 billion represented a
reasonable range of total enterprise value for the
post-transaction combined company. Duff & Phelps then
deducted its estimate of pro forma post-transaction debt (net of
cash) and the value of post-transaction Reliance options to
arrive at a fully diluted common equity value ranging from
$2.35 billion to $3.03 billion. Finally, dividing by
Duff & Phelps estimate of 38.4 million
post-transaction shares resulted in an estimated value ranging
from $61.00 per share to $79.00 per share,
representing an increase from Reliances valuation range on
a standalone basis.
Duff & Phelps identified acquisitions announced during
the last two years involving publicly traded steel industry
targets, excluding bankrupt and distressed target companies, and
calculated the premiums paid or offered in those transactions.
Six relevant transactions were identified and are shown below:
|
|
|
|
Target |
|
Buyer |
|
Dofasco, Inc.(1)(2)
|
|
ThyssenKrupp AG |
Dofasco, Inc.(1)(2)
|
|
Arcelor SA |
Roanoke Electric Steel Corp.(1)
|
|
Steel Dynamics, Inc. |
Metals USA, Inc.
|
|
Apollo Advisors LP |
International Steel Group, Inc.
|
|
Mittal Steel Company NV/ Ispat International NV |
Commonwealth Industries, Inc.
|
|
Aleris International, Inc. |
|
|
(1) |
Pending transaction |
(2) |
Dofasco has received competing bids |
Based on its analysis of the transactions identified above, its
analysis of the merger, and market data available through
January 13, 2006 (the latest full trading day prior to
Duff & Phelps presentation to EMJs board of
directors), Duff & Phelps derived the following
information with respect to premiums paid/offered:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
1 Day | |
|
5 Day | |
|
20 Day | |
|
30 Day | |
|
20-Day Avg. | |
|
|
| |
Identified Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean
|
|
|
36.8% |
|
|
|
34.6% |
|
|
|
29.7% |
|
|
|
23.8% |
|
|
|
31.7% |
|
|
Median
|
|
|
41.5% |
|
|
|
41.7% |
|
|
|
26.7% |
|
|
|
23.7% |
|
|
|
31.1% |
|
Proposed Transaction
|
|
|
26.8% |
|
|
|
31.6% |
|
|
|
30.0% |
|
|
|
29.7% |
|
|
|
31.8% |
|
(assumes 1/17/06 as announcement date)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
In addition to steel industry transactions, Duff &
Phelps compared the premium implied by the merger price to
overall average premiums in the domestic merger and acquisition
market. The published data that Duff & Phelps used
regarding overall acquisition premiums are based on a comparison
of transaction prices with the market prices of the target
companies five days prior to announcement. The table below
summarizes the average market premiums for the overall merger
and acquisition market in 2004 and 2005. As shown in the table
above, the most comparable figure for EMJ the
premium versus market price five days prior to
announcement is 31.6%, which is in excess of the
overall market average for each of the last two years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
Overall Average Premium All Industries
|
|
|
30.7 |
% |
|
|
28.2 |
% |
Number of Transactions
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
In summary, Duff & Phelps made the following
observations:
|
|
|
|
|
The merger price is at the high end of the valuation range
indicated by the discounted cash flow analysis for EMJ, and the
valuation multiples implied by the merger price are generally in
line with the valuation multiples exhibited by the comparable
public companies and the comparable transactions. |
|
|
|
The merger price is above any price at which EMJ has traded
since its initial public offering date, and the premium over
recent trading prices is generally in line with premiums paid in
the steel industry and the overall public company merger and
acquisition market over the past two years. |
|
|
|
The current price of Reliance common stock is within the range
of values indicated by the discounted cash flow analysis, and
valuation multiples implied by Reliances current stock
price are at the high end of the range as compared with the peer
companies, but such premium is consistent with the premium
market valuation of Reliance over the past ten years. |
|
|
|
The inclusion of the collar in the merger structure provides EMJ
stockholders with significant protection against movements in
Reliances stock price prior to closing. |
|
|
|
Although EMJ stockholders will receive cash and stock, except
for the Kelso Funds, those stockholders unwilling to hold
Reliance shares will be able to immediately liquidate their
securities in the open market. |
Duff & Phelps is a nationally recognized investment
banking firm that is regularly engaged to render financial
opinions in connection with mergers and acquisitions, tax
matters, ESOP and ERISA matters, corporate planning and other
purposes. Previously, Duff & Phelps has provided EMJ
with: (1) financial advisory services with respect to
EMJs litigation with the Department of Labor, (2) the
appraisal of capital stock for administration of EMJs
stock bonus plan (the predecessor to EMJs retirement
savings plan), and (3) fairness opinions in connection with
EMJs merger and financial restructuring consummated in
April 2005.
EMJ has paid Duff & Phelps a fixed fee of $600,000 in
connection with the services provided by it under this
engagement. No portion of Duff & Phelps fees was
contingent upon completion of the merger or the conclusion
reached by Duff & Phelps in its fairness opinion. EMJ
has also agreed to reimburse Duff & Phelps for its
expenses incurred in performing its services and to indemnify
Duff & Phelps and its affiliates, their respective
directors, officers, agents and employees and each person, if
any, controlling Duff & Phelps or any of its affiliates
against certain liabilities and expenses, including certain
liabilities under federal securities laws, related to or arising
out of Duff & Phelps engagement and any related
transactions.
66
Reliances Reasons for the Merger
Reliances general business strategy includes the
acquisition of assets or businesses that are a logical extension
of its existing businesses in order to (1) increase cash
flow and earnings, (2) expand its geographic and customer
diversification and (3) expand its product diversification
in the metals service center industry. As shown in
Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Information,
Reliance believes that on a pro forma basis, the acquisition of
EMJ will be immediately accretive to Reliances earnings.
The acquisition of EMJ will allow Reliance to expand its
presence in the Midwest, New England and Canada. The acquisition
of EMJ will also permit Reliance to increase the diversity of
its products, in areas such as specialty bar and tubing and
other specialty metal products that are not a principal part of
Reliances present product line. This diversification of
products should enable Reliance to further expand its customer
base into new industries.
In reaching its decision to approve the merger agreement,
Reliances board of directors consulted with Reliance
management and its financial and legal advisors, and considered
a variety of factors, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Other available acquisition opportunities in the metals service
center business and Reliances business, operations,
financial condition, earnings, prospects and acquisition
strategy; |
|
|
|
The business, operations, financial condition, earnings and
prospects of EMJ; |
|
|
|
The ability of EMJs operations to enhance Reliances
geographic, customer and product diversification; |
|
|
|
Potential contingent liabilities associated with EMJ and its
assets, including litigation, environmental and regulatory
issues; |
|
|
|
EMJs well-qualified and stable management team with the
capacity to effectively manage EMJs operations on a
going-forward basis in a manner complementary to the operations
of Reliance; |
|
|
|
EMJs size and complementary product mix, geographic
diversity and profitability; |
|
|
|
Recognizing that there can be no assurance as to future
financial results, the anticipated financial impact of the
merger on Reliances financial performance, including the
anticipated impact on Reliances earnings and cash flow per
share; |
|
|
|
The capital structure of Reliance following the merger,
including Reliances ability to finance the cash portion of
the merger consideration under its existing revolving credit
facility and to continue to reduce indebtedness at a
satisfactory rate following the merger; |
|
|
|
The structure of the merger and the financial and other terms of
the merger agreement; |
|
|
|
The expectation that the merger will qualify as a tax-deferred
reorganization for purposes of Section 368(a)
of the Code; and |
|
|
|
The opinion of UBS Securities LLC that, as of the date of and
based on and subject to the matters described in the opinion,
the merger consideration to be paid by Reliance pursuant to the
merger agreement was fair from a financial point of view to
Reliance. |
While a decision to complete the merger did not include an
analysis by Reliance of potential synergies, Reliance believes
that synergies may be realized through the integration of
financial reporting, the removal of redundant public company
costs, enhanced metals sourcing, and the sharing of best
practices which have the potential to improve the financial
results of EMJ and also provide benefits to Reliance.
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors
considered by Reliances board of directors is not
exhaustive but does include the material factors considered by
the Reliance board of directors. Reliances board of
directors did not quantify or assign any relative or specific
weights to the various
67
factors that it considered. Rather, Reliances board of
directors based its decision to approve the merger agreement on
the totality of the information presented to and considered by
it.
Management and Operations Following the Merger
Consistent with Reliances historical acquisition strategy,
EMJ will continue to operate relatively independently. Reliance
management believes little operational integration will be
necessary. With the exception of EMJs chief executive
officer, Mr. Nelson, who will retire upon the closing of
the merger but will continue as a consultant during a
post-closing transition period, the existing management team of
EMJ is expected to remain in place and continue to operate EMJ
on a going-forward basis. Reliance has no current plans to close
or downsize any of EMJs present facilities nor does
Reliance anticipate any material changes in EMJs
employment levels. The directors of EMJ after the merger will be
the directors of RSAC prior to the merger, plus
Mr. McCaffery and Mr. Johnson from EMJ. The executive
officers of EMJ will include the executive officers of EMJ prior
to the merger, other than Mr. Nelson, as well as certain
officers of Reliance.
Interests of EMJs Directors and Executive Officers in
the Merger
In considering the recommendation of EMJs board of
directors with respect to the merger agreement and the merger,
EMJs stockholders should be aware that some of EMJs
directors and executive officers have interests in the merger
and have arrangements that are different from, or in addition
to, those of EMJs stockholders generally. These interests
and arrangements may create potential conflicts of interest.
EMJs board of directors was aware of these potential
conflicts of interest and considered them, among other matters,
in reaching its decisions to approve the merger agreement and
the merger and to recommend that EMJs stockholders vote in
favor of adopting the merger agreement and approving the merger.
|
|
|
Nelson Retention Agreement |
On December 17, 2004, Mr. Nelson entered into a
retention agreement with EMJ whereby EMJ agreed to pay
Mr. Nelson a bonus of $3 million on March 31,
2007, if he continues to serve as EMJs President and chief
executive officer through such date. Pursuant to the retention
agreement, Mr. Nelson is also entitled to the bonus if his
employment with EMJ is terminated by Mr. Nelson for good
reason, which includes ongoing diminution in
Mr. Nelsons title, duties or responsibilities or a
material reduction in his base salary or benefits.
Mr. Nelsons employment as chief executive officer
will terminate for good reason (as defined in the retention
agreement) upon completion of the merger and Mr. Nelson
will become entitled to payment of the bonus of $3 million
six months after completion of the merger and his termination.
|
|
|
Johnson Retention Agreement |
On January 17, 2006, Mr. Johnson, EMJs vice
president, chief financial officer and secretary, entered into a
retention agreement with EMJ that provides for employment and
severance benefits and has a term of three years, unless
terminated earlier pursuant to its terms.
Mr. Johnsons retention agreement provides generally
that Mr. Johnsons terms and conditions of employment
(including position, responsibility, location, compensation, and
benefits) will not be adversely changed during the term of the
agreement and provides for certain minimum guaranteed
compensation levels (including base salary, annual bonus,
long-term incentives, and participation in benefit plans) during
such term.
On the six-month anniversary of the effective time of the
merger, if Mr. Johnson remains employed by EMJ, Reliance or
any affiliate of Reliance, Mr. Johnson will be entitled to
a bonus of approximately $425,000. On the twelve-month
anniversary of the effective time of the merger, if
Mr. Johnson remains employed by EMJ, Reliance or any
affiliate of Reliance, Mr. Johnson will be entitled to an
additional bonus of $200,000. If EMJ terminates
Mr. Johnsons employment without cause or if
Mr. Johnson terminates his employment for good
reason (as defined in the retention agreement and
summarized
68
below) with an effective termination date prior to the six-month
anniversary of the effective time of the merger, then
Mr. Johnson will be eligible to receive the six-month
bonus. If EMJ terminates Mr. Johnsons employment
without cause or if Mr. Johnson terminates his employment
for good reason with an effective termination date on or after
the six-month anniversary and prior to the twelve-month
anniversary of the effective time of the merger, then
Mr. Johnson will be eligible to receive a pro rata portion
of the twelve-month bonus based on the number of days elapsed
since the effective time of the merger. For purposes of
Mr. Johnsons retention agreement, good
reason is defined generally to include a material
reduction of his base salary or bonus and incentive
compensation, material adverse changes to
Mr. Johnsons disability policies or life or
disability insurance benefits, unless such changes affect all
senior executives equally, and certain relocations.
|
|
|
Special Bonus Plan for Senior Management |
On January 17, 2006, EMJs board of directors approved
a special bonus plan for senior management providing that,
immediately prior to the closing of the merger, EMJ will pay a
taxable bonus to certain members of EMJ senior management in
connection with the completion of the merger in an aggregate
amount not to exceed $5 million, which bonus will be
allocated to such members of EMJs senior management as
determined by EMJs board of directors.
The table below sets forth the bonus awards expected to be
granted to each executive officer of EMJ pursuant to the special
bonus plan for senior management.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of | |
Name |
|
Bonus Award | |
|
|
| |
R. Neil McCaffery
|
|
$ |
312,500 |
|
Frank D. Travetto
|
|
$ |
312,500 |
|
Kenneth L. Henry
|
|
$ |
312,500 |
|
James D. Hoffman
|
|
$ |
312,500 |
|
William S. Johnson
|
|
$ |
625,000 |
|
As of the record date, the Kelso Funds and their affiliates,
including two of EMJs directors, hold
25,205,133 shares of EMJs common stock, of which the
Kelso Funds hold 25,174,634 shares representing 50.1% of
the issued and outstanding shares of EMJs common stock.
Upon completion of the merger, the Kelso Funds and their
affiliates will receive aggregate merger consideration
consisting of approximately $163.8 million in cash and
2,340,142 shares of Reliance common stock (assuming the
average closing price of the Reliance common stock for the
pricing period is equal to $70.01, which would be the average
closing price for the pricing period if the pricing period ended
on January 31, 2006).
Of the 25,205,133 shares held by the Kelso Funds and their
affiliates, (1) 22,445,810 shares are owned of record
by KIA IV, (2) 11,616 shares are owned of record by
KEP II, (3) 1,704,740 shares are owned of record
by KIA III EMJ, (4) 1,012,468 shares
are owned of record by or KIA I. In addition, 5,000 shares
are owned of record by George E. Matelich (a general partner of
Kelso Partners IV, L.P., or KP IV, which is the general partner
of KIA IV, and a general partner of KEP II),
5,000 shares are owned of record by Thomas R. Wall, IV
(a general partner of KP IV and a general partner of
KEP II) and 20,499 shares are owned of record by Frank
T. Nickell. Mr. Nickell is a general partner of KP I,
KP III and KP IV. Mr. Nickell is also President, Chief
Executive Officer and a director of Kelso & Companies,
Inc., which is the general partner of Kelso & Company,
L.P. Mr. Nickell is deemed to beneficially own
25,195,133 shares of EMJ common stock. Mr. Nickell
owns 20,499 shares of record and will receive approximately
$133,000 and 1,903 shares of Reliance common stock in the
merger (assuming the average closing price of the Reliance
common stock for the pricing period is equal to $70.01).
Mr. Nickell disclaims beneficial ownership of the
securities owned or deemed beneficially owned by each of the
Kelso Funds pursuant to
Rule 13d-4 under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange
Act. Mr. Nickell is a director of EMJ and shares investment
and voting power with respect to shares of
69
EMJs common stock held by the Kelso Funds.
Mr. Wahrhaftig is a general partner of KP IV and a managing
director and a member of the board of directors of
Kelso & Companies, Inc., KP I, KP III and
KP IV are the general partners of KIA I,
KIA III-EMJ and KIA IV, respectively. Mr. Wahrhaftig
is a director of EMJ and shares investment and voting power with
respect to shares of EMJs common stock held by KIA IV.
Mr. Wahrhaftig is deemed to beneficially own
22,457,426 shares of EMJ common stock. Mr. Wahrhaftig
holds no shares of EMJ common stock of record and will not
directly receive any merger consideration. Mr. Wahrhaftig
disclaims beneficial ownership of the securities owned or deemed
beneficially owned by each of the Kelso Funds pursuant to
Rule 13d-4 under
the Exchange Act.
The Kelso Funds have entered into the voting agreement with
Reliance pursuant to which they have agreed to vote the
25,174,634 shares of EMJ common stock held by them in favor
of the adoption and approval of the merger agreement.
Reliance also entered into the registration rights agreement
with the Kelso Funds pursuant to which Reliance will prepare and
file, within ten days after the closing of the merger, a
registration statement under the Securities Act at
Reliances expense, covering all or a portion of the Kelso
Funds shares. Pursuant to the registration rights
agreement, Reliance also will provide the Kelso Funds with
certain demand and piggyback registration rights with respect to
the shares of Reliance common stock received by the Kelso Funds
in the merger.
|
|
|
Merger Consideration to be Received by EMJs
Executive Officers and Directors |
EMJs executive officers participate in EMJs
retirement savings plan and EMJs executive officers and
some of EMJs directors participate in EMJs equity
plans under which stock options have been granted. Upon
completion of the merger, executive officers and certain
directors of EMJ will receive the same merger consideration as
the other EMJ stockholders for their EMJ common stock and will
receive cash or options to purchase Reliance common stock for
their EMJ stock options. See The Merger
Agreement Merger Consideration and The
Merger Agreement Treatment of EMJ Stock Options and
Other Equity-Based Awards.
70
The table below sets forth for each executive officer and
director of EMJ, other than those affiliated with the Kelso
Funds, (1) the shares of EMJ common stock beneficially
owned, (2) the options to purchase shares of EMJ common
stock granted pursuant to the EMJ incentive plan, (3) the
options to purchase shares of EMJ common stock granted pursuant
to the Holding option plan, (4) the number of options to
purchase Reliance common stock to be received upon conversion of
options to purchase EMJ common stock under the EMJ incentive
plan (assuming an average closing price of Reliance common stock
for the pricing period of $70.01) and (5) the amount of
cash to be received in exchange for the options outstanding
under the Holding option plan at $13.00 per share less the
actual exercise price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EMJ | |
|
Options to Purchase | |
|
Options to Purchase | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common | |
|
EMJ Common | |
|
EMJ Common | |
|
Options to Purchase | |
|
|
|
|
Stock | |
|
Stock Pursuant to | |
|
Stock Pursuant to | |
|
Reliance Common | |
|
|
|
|
Beneficially | |
|
the EMJ Incentive | |
|
the Holding Option | |
|
Stock to be | |
|
Cash for Holding | |
Name |
|
Owned | |
|
Plan | |
|
Plan | |
|
Received | |
|
Stock Options | |
| |
David M. Roderick
|
|
|
34,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
176,410 |
(1) |
|
|
1,856 |
|
|
$ |
1,707,331.26 |
|
Maurice S. Nelson, Jr.
|
|
|
6,533.8682 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
1,693,538 |
(2) |
|
|
9,284 |
|
|
$ |
16,816,832.34 |
|
Dr. John Rutledge
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
70,564 |
(3) |
|
|
1,856 |
|
|
$ |
678,432.29 |
|
William A. Marquard
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
70,564 |
(3) |
|
|
1,856 |
|
|
$ |
678,432.29 |
|
Earl L. Mason
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph T. ODonnell, Jr.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
Andrew G. Sharkey, III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
R. Neil McCaffery
|
|
|
32,028.1751 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
167,591 |
(4) |
|
|
5,570 |
|
|
$ |
1,577,778.58 |
|
Frank D. Travetto
|
|
|
33,502.8509 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
167,591 |
(4) |
|
|
5,570 |
|
|
$ |
1,577,778.58 |
|
Kenneth L. Henry
|
|
|
131,545.2923 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
167,591 |
(4) |
|
|
5,570 |
|
|
$ |
1,577,778.58 |
|
James D. Hoffman
|
|
|
17,074.5286 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
167,591 |
(4) |
|
|
5,570 |
|
|
$ |
1,577,778.58 |
|
William S. Johnson
|
|
|
9,665.0748 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
123,488 |
(5) |
|
|
5,570 |
|
|
$ |
1,125,438.13 |
|
|
|
|
Indemnification; Directors and Officers
Insurance |
RSAC has agreed to indemnify, defend and hold harmless, and
provide advancement of expenses to, all past and present
directors, officers and employees of EMJ and its subsidiaries
for acts or omissions occurring prior to the merger to the
fullest extent permitted by applicable law. In addition, for a
period of six years after the merger, Reliance has agreed, and
has agreed to cause RSAC, to maintain and preserve, RSACs
certificate of incorporation and bylaws to contain provisions
regarding exculpation, indemnification and advancement of
expenses for officers, directors and employees of EMJ that
overall are no less generous than those included in the current
EMJ certificate of incorporation and bylaws and to honor all of
EMJs obligations to indemnify all officers, directors and
employees of EMJ for acts and omissions by such persons prior to
the completion of the merger to the extent such obligations
existed on January 17, 2006. These obligations survive the
effectiveness of the merger and shall continue in full force and
effect in accordance with the terms of the relevant document
until the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations.
For a period of six years after the merger, Reliance has agreed
to maintain the current policies of directors and
officers liability insurance and fiduciary liability
insurance maintained by EMJ with respect to claims arising from
or related to facts or events that occurred prior to the merger
and with a total insured coverage of $50 million of
directors and officers liability insurance and
$5 million of fiduciary liability insurance; provided that
if the annual insurance premium payments for both insured
coverages exceed a specified amount, Reliance will obtain a
policy with the most advantageous terms available for that
premium payment amount.
Transaction-Related Costs and Financing Arrangements
Upon completion of the merger, Reliance will pay cash
consideration of approximately $356 million to EMJ
stockholders and option holders, issue between approximately
4.5 million and 6.1 million shares of its
71
common stock and assume approximately $299 million of
EMJs debt (based on EMJs outstanding indebtedness as
of September 28, 2005).
Reliance and EMJ expect to incur transaction-related costs
aggregating approximately $18.7 million (including
financial advisory, legal, accounting, consulting and public
relations fees, registration and regulatory filing fees and
printing and mailing costs associated with this proxy statement/
prospectus). In addition, Reliance will incur a maximum of
$10.5 million for the payment of retention bonuses,
management bonuses, severance payments and other change of
control benefits pursuant to existing EMJ contracts in
connection with the merger.
Reliance intends to finance the cash portion of the
consideration to be paid to EMJ stockholders and option holders
in the merger, as well as other expenses of the transaction,
through a combination of cash on hand, if any, and by drawing on
its existing credit facility. Reliance has obtained all
necessary consents or waivers required by its lenders to
complete the merger. Availability of financing is not a
condition precedent to Reliances obligation to effect the
merger.
EMJs Financing Arrangements
EMJ has outstanding $250 million of
93/4% notes.
As a result of the merger, the holders of the
93/4% notes
have the option to require their redemption at 101% of face
value. Pursuant to the terms of the
93/4% notes,
Reliance will offer to buy the
93/4% notes,
although it does not expect many of the holders of the
93/4% notes
to accept the offer due to the interest rate they are receiving,
a current trading value of approximately 109%, and the strength
of Reliances financial condition. Reliance plans to pay
the balance of EMJs current $300 million credit
facility, which will release the liens held by EMJs
lenders under that facility. Reliance will then provide EMJ with
a revolving credit arrangement whereby EMJ can borrow as needed
from Reliance and repay Reliance with interest at market
interest rates.
Regulatory Matters
|
|
|
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act |
The merger is subject to the requirements of the HSR Act. The
HSR Act requires that each party participating in an acquisition
transaction meeting certain size thresholds notify and provide
certain information and materials to the Federal Trade
Commission and the Antitrust Division of the Department of
Justice and certain waiting periods must be terminated or must
expire before the subject transaction can be completed. EMJ and
Reliance filed their respective notification and report forms on
January 20, 2006. Accordingly, unless the waiting period is
earlier terminated or extended by a request for additional
information, the waiting period will expire on February 21,
2006.
At any time before or after completion of the merger, the
Federal Trade Commission or the Department of Justice may,
however, challenge the merger on antitrust grounds. Private
parties also could take action under the antitrust laws,
including seeking an injunction prohibiting or delaying the
merger, divestiture or damages under certain circumstances.
Additionally, at any time before or after the completion of the
merger, notwithstanding expiration or termination of the
applicable waiting period, any state could take action under the
antitrust laws as it deems necessary or desirable in the public
interest. There can be no assurance that a challenge to the
merger will not be made or that, if a challenge is made, EMJ and
Reliance will prevail.
|
|
|
Bermuda Monetary Authority |
The corporate and insurance laws of Bermuda govern the business
and operations of Stainless Insurance Ltd., a captive
insurance subsidiary of EMJ, whose entire issued and outstanding
share capital will be held by RSAC as a result of the merger.
The treatment of Stainless Insurance Ltd.s share capital
in the merger cannot be accomplished without (1) the
consent of the Bermuda Monetary Authority (Authorization and
Compliance Division) pursuant to the Exchange Control Act 1972
and (2) the no
72
objections approval from the Bermuda Monetary Authority
(Insurance Division) under the Insurance Act 1978.
In order to obtain the consent of the Bermuda Monetary Authority
(Authorization and Compliance Division), Reliance will be
required to submit an application that will include certain
information about Reliance including its financial statements,
beneficial ownership information and information relating to its
expertise in the area of insurance.
In order to obtain the no objections approval from
the Bermuda Monetary Authority (Insurance Division), Reliance
may be required to submit a business plan, including a
description of the proposed insurance business of Stainless
Insurance Ltd. and five year financial projections, for the
period commencing on the closing of the merger. Prior to giving
its no objections approval, the Bermuda Monetary
Authority (Insurance Division) may also, in its discretion,
submit the proposed application to the Bermuda Insurance
Admissions Committee which is comprised of individuals from the
Bermuda insurance industry who meet each week to review and
provide recommendations to the Bermuda Monetary Authority
(Insurance Division) concerning insurance company applications.
The final determination concerning the no objections
approval rests with the Bermuda Monetary Authority (Insurance
Division).
|
|
|
Canadian Regulatory Filings |
The Investment Canada Act governs the acquisition of EMJs
Canadian subsidiary by Reliance. Pursuant to the Investment
Canada Act, Reliance will make a notice filing with the Canadian
Director of Investments following the completion of the merger.
We are not aware of any other federal or state regulatory
requirements that must be complied with or approvals that must
be obtained to consummate the merger. We also may be required to
make filings and obtain regulatory approvals from various other
governmental authorities. Where necessary, the parties intend to
make such filings. See The Merger Agreement
Additional Covenants Reasonable Best Efforts
and The Merger Agreement Conditions to
Closing.
Accounting Treatment
Reliance intends to account for the merger under the purchase
method of accounting for business combinations under
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Under the
purchase method of accounting, the total estimated purchase
price is allocated to the net identifiable tangible and
intangible assets of an acquired entity based on their estimated
fair values as of the completion of the merger, with any excess
being treated as goodwill. A final determination of these fair
values will include managements consideration of a
valuation prepared by an independent valuation specialist. This
valuation will be based on the actual net tangible and
intangible assets of the acquired entity that exist as of the
closing date of the transaction. Reliance will include
EMJs results of operations in Reliances consolidated
financial statements from the date of completion of the merger.
Restrictions on Sale of Shares by Affiliates of EMJ and
Reliance
The shares of Reliance common stock to be received by EMJs
stockholders in connection with the merger will be registered
under the Securities Act and will be freely transferable, except
for shares of Reliance common stock issued to any person who is
deemed to be an affiliate of EMJ or Reliance at the effective
time of the merger. Persons who may be deemed to be affiliates
include individuals or entities that control, are controlled by,
or are under common control with EMJ and may include the
executive officers, directors and significant stockholders of
EMJ or Reliance. Affiliates may not sell their shares of
Reliance common stock acquired in connection with the merger
except pursuant to:
|
|
|
|
|
an effective registration statement under the Securities Act
covering the resale of those shares; |
|
|
|
Rule 145 (or for EMJ stockholders who become affiliates of
Reliance, Rule 144) under the Securities Act; or |
73
|
|
|
|
|
any other applicable exemption under the Securities Act. |
The merger agreement requires EMJ to use its reasonable best
efforts to cause each of its affiliates to execute a written
agreement to the effect that such person will not offer to sell
or otherwise dispose of any of the shares of Reliance common
stock issued to such person in or pursuant to the merger except
in compliance with the Securities Act and the rules and
regulations promulgated by the SEC thereunder. Reliances
registration statement on
Form S-4, of which
this proxy statement/ prospectus forms a part, may not be used
in connection with the resale of shares of Reliance common stock
received in the merger by affiliates.
Reliance has entered into the registration rights agreement with
the Kelso Funds pursuant to which Reliance will prepare and
file, within ten days after the closing of the merger, a
registration statement under the Securities Act at
Reliances expense, covering all or a portion of the Kelso
Funds shares. Pursuant to the registration rights
agreement, Reliance also will provide the Kelso Funds with
certain demand and piggyback registration rights with respect to
the shares of Reliance common stock received by the Kelso Funds
in the merger.
Stock Market Listing
An application was filed with the New York Stock Exchange
on ,
2006 for listing: (1) the shares of Reliance common stock
to be issued in the merger, (2) the shares of Reliance
common stock issuable upon exercise of the options to purchase
Reliance common stock upon the conversion of options to purchase
shares of EMJ common stock in connection with the merger and
(3) the shares of Reliance common stock to be issued to the
retirement savings plan pursuant to EMJs obligation under
such plan. If the merger is completed, EMJ common stock will be
delisted from the New York Stock Exchange and will be
deregistered under the Exchange Act.
74
THE MERGER AGREEMENT
The following describes certain aspects of the merger,
including material provisions of the merger agreement. The
following description of the merger agreement is subject to, and
qualified in its entirety by reference to, the merger agreement,
which is attached to this document as Annex A and is
incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus.
We urge you to read the merger agreement carefully and in its
entirety, as it is the legal document governing the merger.
Structure of the Merger
In accordance with the merger agreement and Delaware law, EMJ
will merge with and into RSAC, a direct and wholly-owned
subsidiary of Reliance. As a result of the merger, the separate
corporate existence of EMJ will cease, and RSAC will survive as
a wholly-owned subsidiary of Reliance. As part of the merger,
RSAC will change its name to Earle M. Jorgensen Company.
Merger Consideration
If we complete the merger, EMJ stockholders will be entitled to
receive for each outstanding share of EMJ common stock $6.50 in
cash and a to-be-determined fraction of a share of Reliance
common stock. The value of the Reliance common stock component
will be approximately $6.50, but is subject to adjustment. The
value of Reliance common stock to be issued in exchange for each
share of EMJ common stock will be determined based upon the
average Reliance stock price. If the average closing price of
Reliance common stock for the pricing period is:
|
|
|
|
|
more than $72.86, you will receive Reliance common stock with a
value that may be more than $6.50 for each share of EMJ common
stock; |
|
|
|
equal to or less than $72.86 but equal to or more than $53.86,
you will receive Reliance common stock with a value of $6.50 for
each share of EMJ common stock; and |
|
|
|
less than $53.86, you will receive Reliance common stock with a
value that may be less than $6.50 for each share of EMJ common
stock. |
The number of shares of Reliance common stock you will receive
in the merger will equal the number, rounded down to the nearest
whole number, determined by multiplying the exchange ratio by
the number of shares of EMJ common stock you own.
You will not receive any fractional shares of Reliance common
stock in the merger. Instead, you will be entitled to receive
cash, without interest, for any fractional share of Reliance
common stock you might otherwise have been entitled to receive,
based on the average closing price of Reliance common stock for
the pricing period.
The exchange ratio will not be determined until after the date
of the special meeting. Therefore, at the time of the special
meeting, you will not know the precise value of the merger
consideration you will receive on the date the merger is
completed.
We will adjust the value or number of shares of Reliance common
stock that you receive for each of your shares of EMJ common
stock based upon the average closing price of Reliance common
stock for the pricing period. If the average Reliance price
stock is:
|
|
|
|
|
more than $72.86, then you will receive 0.0892 shares of
Reliance common stock for each share of EMJ common stock that
you own; |
|
|
|
equal to or less than $72.86 but equal to or more than $53.86,
then you will receive a fraction of a share of Reliance common
stock equal to $6.50 divided by the average Reliance stock
price; and |
|
|
|
less than $53.86, then you will receive 0.1207 shares of
Reliance common stock for each share of EMJ common stock you own. |
75
The following table provides some examples of how the formula
above works to determine the exchange ratio and the
corresponding value of the Reliance common stock that you will
receive for a share of EMJ common stock at various average
Reliance stock prices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Value of Cash | |
|
|
|
|
Value of Reliance | |
|
|
|
and Reliance | |
|
|
|
|
Common Stock per | |
|
Cash per Share of | |
|
Common Stock per | |
|
|
|
|
Share of EMJ Common | |
|
EMJ Common | |
|
Share of EMJ | |
Average Reliance Stock Price |
|
Exchange Ratio | |
|
Stock | |
|
Stock | |
|
Common Stock | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$40
|
|
|
0.1207 |
|
|
$ |
4.83 |
|
|
$ |
6.50 |
|
|
$ |
11.33 |
|
$45
|
|
|
0.1207 |
|
|
$ |
5.43 |
|
|
$ |
6.50 |
|
|
$ |
11.93 |
|
$50
|
|
|
0.1207 |
|
|
$ |
6.03 |
|
|
$ |
6.50 |
|
|
$ |
12.53 |
|
$53.86 - $72.86
|
|
|
0.1207 - 0.0892 |
|
|
$ |
6.50 |
|
|
$ |
6.50 |
|
|
$ |
13.00 |
|
$75
|
|
|
0.0892 |
|
|
$ |
6.69 |
|
|
$ |
6.50 |
|
|
$ |
13.19 |
|
$80
|
|
|
0.0892 |
|
|
$ |
7.14 |
|
|
$ |
6.50 |
|
|
$ |
13.64 |
|
$85
|
|
|
0.0892 |
|
|
$ |
7.58 |
|
|
$ |
6.50 |
|
|
$ |
14.08 |
|
We expect the market price of Reliance common stock to fluctuate
prior to the merger. Therefore, because the value and number of
shares of Reliance common stock you receive in the merger is
determined based upon the average closing price of Reliance
common stock for the pricing period, you should obtain current
stock price quotations for Reliance common stock prior to voting
on the merger. You should also note that, because the exchange
ratio is fixed two trading days before the closing of the merger
and we expect the market price of Reliance common stock to
fluctuate, the value of the Reliance common stock that you will
receive in the merger may increase or decrease during the
two-day trading period between the end of the pricing period and
the closing of the merger.
Based upon 50,237,094 shares of EMJ common stock
outstanding as of January 31, 2006, and an assumed exchange
ratio of 0.0928, which is based on the average closing market
price of Reliance common stock during the 20 consecutive trading
days ended January 31, 2006, Reliance will issue an
aggregate of approximately 4,662,002 shares of Reliance
common stock in the merger to the holders of these shares of EMJ
common stock. Based upon the 33,133,199 shares of Reliance
common stock outstanding as of January 31, 2006, the
holders of these shares of EMJ common stock collectively will
hold approximately 12.3% of the shares of Reliance common stock
outstanding immediately after the merger.
Treatment of EMJ Stock Options and Other Equity-Based
Awards
Each outstanding option to acquire EMJ common stock granted
under the Holding option plan will be converted automatically at
the effective time of the merger into the right to receive an
amount in cash, if any, equal to (1) the difference between
(a) $13.00 and (b) the applicable per share exercise
price, multiplied by (2) the number of shares of EMJ common
stock subject to such stock option, subject to any applicable
withholding of taxes.
Each outstanding option to acquire EMJ common stock granted
under the EMJ incentive plan will be converted automatically at
the effective time of the merger into an option to purchase
Reliance common stock and will continue to be governed by the
terms of the EMJ incentive plan and related grant agreements
under which it was granted, except that:
|
|
|
|
|
the number of shares of Reliance common stock subject to the new
Reliance stock option will be equal to the product of the number
of shares of EMJ common stock subject to the EMJ stock option
and the option exchange ratio, rounded down to the nearest whole
share; and |
76
|
|
|
|
|
the exercise price per share of Reliance common stock subject to
the new Reliance stock option will be equal to the exercise
price per share of EMJ common stock under the EMJ stock option
divided by the option exchange ratio, rounded up to the nearest
cent. |
The option exchange ratio will be the product of the exchange
ratio used to determine the fraction of a share of Reliance
common stock to be issued for each share of EMJ common stock in
the merger multiplied by two, to account for the fact that cash
consideration will not be paid.
Reliance has agreed to reserve additional shares of Reliance
common stock to satisfy its obligations under the EMJ retirement
savings plan and pursuant to the converted stock options and
other equity-based awards and to file a registration statement
with the SEC on an appropriate form to the extent necessary to
register Reliance common stock subject to the converted stock
options and other equity-based awards.
Closing and Effective Time of the Merger
The merger will be effective at the time and date stated in the
certificate of merger that will be filed with the Secretary of
State of the State of Delaware, the state of incorporation of
RSAC and EMJ. Under the merger agreement, the filing of the
certificate of merger and the closing of the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement will occur on the second
business day following the satisfaction or waiver of all
conditions to the merger, unless otherwise agreed to by the
parties.
Surrender of EMJ Stock Certificates
Following the effective time of the merger, Computershare
Investor Services, the exchange/paying agent, will mail to each
record holder of EMJ common stock a transmittal letter that will
detail the procedures for record holders to exchange EMJ common
stock certificates for Reliance certificates and the cash
portion of the merger consideration, plus cash in lieu of any
fractional shares and any dividends to which you might be
entitled at that time. After the effective time of the merger,
transfers of EMJ common stock will not be registered on EMJ
stock transfer books.
Dividends
As a holder of EMJ common stock, you will be entitled to receive
dividends or other distributions on Reliance common stock with a
record date after the merger is completed, but only after you
have surrendered your EMJ stock certificates.
If there is any dividend or other distribution on Reliance
common stock with a record date after the merger, you will
receive the dividend or distribution promptly after the later of
the date that your Reliance shares are issued to you in exchange
for your EMJ certificates and the date the dividend or other
distribution is paid to all Reliance shareholders.
Representations and Warranties
Pursuant to the merger agreement, EMJ and Reliance make certain
representations and warranties to each other about their
respective companies and businesses related to, among other
things:
|
|
|
|
|
corporate existence, qualification to conduct business and
corporate power of both themselves and their respective
subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
capitalization and ownership of subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
corporate authority to enter into, and carry out the obligations
of, the merger agreement, and the enforceability of the merger
agreement; |
|
|
|
absence of conflicts between the merger agreement and their
respective charter documents and bylaws, applicable law or
certain agreements; |
|
|
|
governmental consents and approvals required for completion of
the merger; |
77
|
|
|
|
|
financial statements and filings with the SEC, as well as
internal controls over financial reporting; |
|
|
|
absence of undisclosed liabilities and off-balance sheet
arrangements, as well as loans to officers and directors; |
|
|
|
absence of specified changes or events through the closing of
the merger; |
|
|
|
legal proceedings; |
|
|
|
compliance with applicable laws; |
|
|
|
environmental liabilities; |
|
|
|
insurance policies; |
|
|
|
properties and assets; |
|
|
|
employee benefit plans and labor matters; |
|
|
|
payment of fees to finders or brokers in connection with the
merger; |
|
|
|
tax matters; |
|
|
|
qualification of the merger as a reorganization
under the Code; |
|
|
|
information supplied for use in this proxy statement/ prospectus; |
|
|
|
intellectual property; and |
|
|
|
approval of its respective board of directors. |
EMJ also made representations and warranties to Reliance related
to:
|
|
|
|
|
the inapplicability to the merger of state anti-takeover laws; |
|
|
|
the receipt of an opinion from each of EMJs financial
advisors; and |
|
|
|
material contracts. |
Reliance also represented and warranted to EMJ that, at the time
of mailing this proxy statement/ prospectus, and at the
effective time of the merger, Reliance would have sufficient
funds to enable it to complete the merger.
The representations and warranties contained in the merger
agreement are subject to materiality and knowledge
qualifications in many respects, and do not survive the
effective time of the merger.
This description of the representations and warranties is
included to provide stockholders with information regarding the
terms of the merger agreement. It is not intended to provide any
other factual information about Reliance or EMJ. The assertions
embodied in the representations and warranties are qualified by
information in confidential disclosure letters that the parties
exchanged in connection with signing the merger agreement. The
disclosure letters contain information that modifies, qualifies
and creates exceptions to the representations and warranties.
Accordingly, you should not rely on the representations and
warranties as characterizations of the actual state of facts at
the time they were made or otherwise.
Operations Before Completion of the Merger
|
|
|
Restrictions on EMJs and Reliances Operations
Before Completion of the Merger |
In the merger agreement, EMJ and Reliance have agreed to several
restrictions on their activities until either the completion of
the merger or the termination of the merger agreement. In
general, they are
78
required to conduct their respective businesses in the ordinary
course consistent with past practices, in substantially the same
manner as previously conducted, and to use their reasonable best
efforts to:
|
|
|
|
|
keep available the services of their current officers and other
key employees; |
|
|
|
preserve intact their present lines of business and maintain
their rights and franchises; and |
|
|
|
preserve their relationships with customers, suppliers and
others having business dealings with them. |
|
|
|
Additional Restrictions on EMJs Operations Before
Completion of the Merger |
In addition, EMJ has generally agreed to restrictions that
prohibit it, or any of its subsidiaries, from:
|
|
|
|
|
incurring or committing to any capital expenditures, capital
additions or capital improvements, other than those in the
ordinary course of business or as contemplated by EMJs
fiscal 2006 and 2007 capital budgets and in any event not in
excess of $5 million in the aggregate, except as provided
for in such budgets; |
|
|
|
declaring, setting aside or paying dividends other than
intracompany dividends; |
|
|
|
splitting, combining or reclassifying its capital stock; |
|
|
|
repurchasing, redeeming or otherwise acquiring its capital stock
or securities convertible into or exercisable for any shares of
its capital stock; |
|
|
|
issuing, delivering or selling any shares of its capital stock,
voting debt or convertible securities (or corporate actions
related thereto), other than in connection with the exercise of
EMJ stock options or other stock-based awards; |
|
|
|
amending EMJs charter documents; |
|
|
|
making any material acquisitions, other than acquisitions of
assets used in the operations of EMJ in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice; |
|
|
|
selling, transferring, divesting or disposing of assets
(including the capital stock of its subsidiaries), businesses or
divisions, other than transactions that do not have a fair
value, individually, in excess of $3 million or, in the
aggregate, in excess of $10 million in the ordinary course
of business consistent with past practice; |
|
|
|
incurring liens other than pursuant to specified debt agreements
or incurred in the ordinary course of business consistent with
past practice; |
|
|
|
paying or committing to pay any material severance or
termination pay not existing as of January 17, 2006;
entering into any material employment, deferred compensation,
consulting, severance or similar agreement not existing as of
January 17, 2006; or increasing in any material respect any
employee benefits payable to any director, officer or key
employee except pursuant to an agreement existing as of
January 17, 2006; |
|
|
|
adopting any additional employee benefit plan or making any
material amendment to an employee benefit plan; |
|
|
|
making any material contribution to any employee benefit plan
other than regularly scheduled contributions or those required
by law or agreement; |
|
|
|
entering into any agreement that limits or restricts the right
of EMJ or any of its subsidiaries to engage or compete in any
business or in any geographic area or location; |
|
|
|
changing in any material respect its accounting methods, except
as may be required by a governmental authority or by changes in
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
|
changing its fiscal year, preparing or filing any material tax
return materially inconsistent with past practice or, on such
tax return, taking any position or making any tax election or
adopting any |
79
|
|
|
|
|
method that is materially inconsistent with positions taken,
elections made or methods used in preparing or filing similar
tax returns, or settling or compromising any liability for
taxes; and |
|
|
|
agreeing, authorizing or entering into any commitment to do any
of the foregoing. |
|
|
|
Additional Restrictions on Reliances Operations
Before Completion of the Merger |
Reliance has agreed to restrictions that prohibit it from:
|
|
|
|
|
repurchasing, redeeming or otherwise acquiring its capital stock
or securities convertible into or exercisable for any shares of
its capital stock; |
|
|
|
issuing, delivering or selling any shares of its capital stock,
voting debt or convertible securities (or corporate actions
related thereto), other than in connection with the exercise or
grant of Reliance stock options or other stock-based awards or
intracompany issuances of capital stock; |
|
|
|
amending Reliances charter documents; |
|
|
|
altering the corporate structure of Reliance or any of its
subsidiaries where such change is reasonably likely to result in
a material adverse effect to Reliance or would adversely affect
the value of Reliances common stock; or |
|
|
|
agreeing, authorizing or entering into any commitment to do any
of the foregoing. |
No Solicitation
EMJ agreed in the merger agreement that it will neither, nor
will it authorize or permit any of its subsidiaries, officers,
directors, employees, agents, representatives or affiliates to,
directly or indirectly:
|
|
|
|
|
initiate, negotiate, solicit or knowingly encourage or
facilitate (including by way of furnishing non-public
information) any proposals with respect to a takeover proposal; |
|
|
|
enter into any agreement with respect to any takeover
proposal; or |
|
|
|
furnish, or provide access to, any information or data to, or
have or participate in any discussions or negotiations with, any
person relating to a takeover proposal. |
A takeover proposal means any proposal or offer
relating to or a transaction to effect:
|
|
|
|
|
a transaction pursuant to which any person or group (other than
Reliance and its subsidiaries) directly or indirectly, acquires
or would acquire more than 19% of (1) the outstanding
shares of EMJ common stock, (2) the voting power of the
outstanding securities of EMJ or (3) any new series or new
class of preferred stock of EMJ that would be entitled to a
class or series vote with respect to the merger, whether from
EMJ or pursuant to a tender offer or exchange offer or otherwise; |
|
|
|
a merger, share exchange, consolidation or other business
combination involving EMJ (other than the merger); |
|
|
|
any transaction pursuant to which any person or group of persons
(other than Reliance and its subsidiaries) acquires or would
acquire control of assets (including for this purpose the
outstanding equity securities of EMJ and securities of the
entity surviving any merger or business combination including
any of EMJs subsidiaries) of EMJ or any of EMJs
subsidiaries representing more than 25% of the fair market value
of all of the assets, net revenues or net income of EMJ and its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole, immediately prior to such
transaction; and |
|
|
|
any other consolidation, business combination, recapitalization
or similar transaction involving EMJ or any of its subsidiaries,
as a result of which (a) the holders of shares of EMJ
immediately prior to such transactions do not, in the aggregate,
own at least 81% of the outstanding shares of common stock and
the outstanding voting power of the surviving or resulting
entity in such transaction immediately after the consummation of
such transaction in substantially the same |
80
|
|
|
|
|
proportion as such holders held the shares of EMJ common stock
immediately prior to the consummation of such transaction or
(b) the individuals comprising EMJs board of
directors prior to such transaction do not constitute a majority
of the board of the entity surviving or resulting from such
transaction or such ultimate parent entity following the
consummation of such transaction. |
A superior proposal is any bona fide, unsolicited
takeover proposal made by a third party that is not subject to a
financing condition, other than one similar to the financing
condition in the merger agreement, and is on terms that
EMJs board of directors determines in good faith, after
consultation with EMJs outside legal counsel and financial
advisors, to be more favorable to EMJs stockholders, from
a financial point of view, than the merger described in this
proxy statement/ prospectus. Furthermore, a superior proposal
varies from a takeover proposal in that it means any proposal or
offer relating to or a transaction to effect:
|
|
|
|
|
a transaction pursuant to which any person or group (other than
Reliance and its subsidiaries) directly or indirectly, acquires
or would acquire more than 50% of (1) the outstanding
shares of EMJ common stock, (2) the voting power of the
outstanding securities of EMJ or (3) any new series or new
class of preferred stock of EMJ that would be entitled to a
class or series vote with respect to the merger, whether from
EMJ or pursuant to a tender offer or exchange offer or otherwise; |
|
|
|
any transaction pursuant to which any person or group of persons
(other than Reliance and its subsidiaries) acquires or would
acquire control of assets (including for this purpose the
outstanding equity securities of EMJ and securities of the
entity surviving any merger or business combination including
any of EMJs subsidiaries) of EMJ or any of EMJs
subsidiaries representing more than 50% of the fair market value
of all of the assets, net revenues or net income of EMJ and its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole, immediately prior to such
transaction; or |
|
|
|
any other consolidation, business combination, recapitalization
or similar transaction involving EMJ or any of its subsidiaries,
as a result of which (1) the holders of shares of EMJ
common stock immediately prior to such transactions do not, in
the aggregate, own at least 50% of the outstanding shares of
common stock and the outstanding voting power of the surviving
or resulting entity in such transaction immediately after the
consummation of such transaction in substantially the same
proportion as such holders held the shares of EMJ common stock
immediately prior to the consummation of such transaction or
(2) the individuals comprising EMJs board of
directors prior to such transaction do not constitute a majority
of the board of the entity surviving or resulting from such
transaction or such ultimate parent entity following the
consummation of such transaction. |
Prior to the special meeting, EMJ may, in response to an
unsolicited bona fide written takeover proposal by a third party
and after giving prompt written notice to Reliance, furnish
information to, pursuant to a confidentiality agreement no less
restrictive than the one with Reliance, and participate in
discussions or negotiations with, such third party regarding a
takeover proposal if EMJs board of directors determines in
good faith, after receiving advice of its outside legal counsel
and financial advisor, that the takeover proposal constitutes or
is reasonably likely to constitute a superior proposal.
EMJs board of directors may not withdraw (or modify in a
manner adverse to Reliance) its approval or recommendation of
the merger agreement or the merger or approve, adopt or
recommend any takeover proposal or enter into an agreement
constituting or related to a takeover proposal, unless
(1) following the receipt of an unsolicited takeover
proposal EMJs board of directors determines in good faith
after receiving the advice of a financial advisor and its
outside counsel that such takeover proposal is a superior
proposal, or EMJs board of directors determines in good
faith after receiving the advice of its outside counsel and
financial advisors that there is a reasonable probability that
failure to take such action would result in the board breaching
its fiduciary duties; (2) EMJ provides four business
days prior written notice to Reliance of such action; and
(3) after such notice, EMJs board of directors
determines that the takeover proposal still constitutes a
superior proposal. EMJ has agreed to provide Reliance with prompt
81
notice of any inquiry EMJ reasonably believes could lead to a
takeover proposal and the terms of such inquiry and the identity
of the person making such inquiry and to keep Reliance fully
informed of the status and details of any such inquiry.
Additionally, EMJs board of directors is not prohibited
from taking and disclosing to EMJs stockholders a position
contemplated by
Rules 14d-9 or
14e-2(a) or
Item 1012(a) of Regulation M-A promulgated under the
Exchange Act in response to an unsolicited superior proposal.
For purposes of the foregoing, any violation of the restrictions
described in this portion of the merger agreement summary by any
director, officer or employee of EMJ or any of its subsidiaries,
or any investment banker, financial advisor, attorney,
accountant or other advisor, agent or representative of EMJ is
deemed to be a breach of the relevant restriction by EMJ.
Termination of the Merger Agreement
|
|
|
Termination by Reliance or EMJ |
Either of our respective boards of directors may terminate the
merger agreement and abandon the merger at any time prior to
completion of the merger, whether or not it has been approved by
the EMJ stockholders, if:
|
|
|
|
|
Reliance and EMJ agree to terminate by mutual written consent; |
|
|
|
the merger has not been completed on or before June 2,
2006, except that a party may not terminate the merger agreement
if that partys willful and material breach of the merger
agreement is the primary cause of the merger not being completed
by that date; |
|
|
|
a court or another governmental authority has issued a final and
nonappealable order, decree or ruling or taken other action
permanently restraining, enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the
merger; |
|
|
|
a governmental authority has failed to grant or issue a consent,
permit, order or authorization required to consummate the merger; |
|
|
|
EMJs board of directors determines to accept a superior
proposal; or |
|
|
|
EMJ stockholders fail to adopt the merger agreement at the
special meeting. |
In addition, Reliances board of directors may terminate
the merger agreement and abandon the merger at any time prior to
completion of the merger if:
|
|
|
|
|
EMJs board of directors withdraws or adversely modifies
its recommendation; |
|
|
|
EMJ breaches its representations, warranties or covenants
contained in the merger agreement so that any conditions to
closing are not capable of being satisfied and cannot or have
not been cured within 30 days after written notice to
Reliance of such breach; or |
|
|
|
EMJs board of directors recommends to EMJ stockholders
that they approve a takeover proposal other than the merger. |
EMJs board of directors may terminate the merger agreement
and abandon the merger at any time prior to completion of the
merger if Reliance breaches its representations, warranties or
covenants contained in the merger agreement so that the
conditions to closing are not capable of being satisfied and
cannot or have not been cured within 30 days after written
notice to EMJ of such breach.
82
|
|
|
Termination Fee To Be Paid by EMJ |
EMJ has agreed to pay Reliance a termination fee of
approximately $20.5 million if Reliance terminates the
merger agreement as the result of:
|
|
|
|
|
EMJs board of directors withdrawing or adversely modifying
its recommendation to EMJ stockholders to adopt the merger
agreement and the merger or recommending a takeover proposal
other than the merger; or |
|
|
|
EMJs board of directors accepting a superior proposal. |
Additional Covenants
In addition to the covenants relating to the conduct of the
parties businesses before completion of the merger, each
of Reliance and EMJ has agreed to perform additional specified
covenants. The principal additional covenants are as follows:
EMJ has agreed to hold a special meeting of its stockholders to
consider and vote upon adoption of the merger agreement and to
use its reasonable best efforts to obtain the approval of EMJ
stockholders.
Each of Reliance and EMJ has agreed to cooperate fully with each
other in connection with the making of all filings and responses
as may be required under the HSR Act.
Upon reasonable notice, each of Reliance and EMJ has agreed to,
and has agreed to cause each of its respective significant
subsidiaries to, afford to the other party and to the officers,
employees, accountants, legal counsel, financial advisors and
other representatives of the other party, reasonable access
during normal business hours during the period prior to the
completion of the merger to all of their respective properties,
books, contracts, commitments, personnel and records, and each
of Reliance and EMJ has the right to access the properties,
books, contracts, commitments, personnel and records of any
non-significant subsidiary of the other party to the extent that
the operations or business of any such subsidiary would
reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect upon
such other party.
Each of Reliance and EMJ has agreed to use its commercially
reasonable efforts to take all actions and do all things
necessary or advisable under the merger agreement or applicable
law to complete the merger. This cooperation may include
contesting and resisting any action or proceeding challenging
the merger.
RSAC has agreed to assume all obligations of EMJ with respect to
its retirement savings plan and Reliance has agreed to guarantee
RSACs performance under such plan to make an additional
employer contribution to this plan in a number of shares of
Reliance common stock at least equal to the number of shares of
EMJ common stock that would have been contributed for this year
if the merger had not occurred multiplied by the exchange ratio
multiplied by two. Prior to the completion of the merger,
Reliance has agreed to reserve for issuance the number of shares
of Reliance common stock necessary to satisfy Reliances
obligations with respect to EMJs retirement savings plan.
Reliance also has agreed to file, promptly after the completion
of the merger, a registration statement with the SEC on an
appropriate form to the extent necessary to register Reliance
common stock to be issued or issuable pursuant to the EMJ
retirement savings plan as long as this plan has an investment
option to allow for Reliance common
83
stock, which option must be continued for no less than one year
from the date of the completion of the merger.
RSAC has also agreed, and Reliance has agreed to cause RSAC to,
maintain EMJs existing employee benefit plans for no less
than one year from the date of the closing of the merger, or to
provide benefits that are at least as favorable to EMJ employees
as in effect on the date of the merger agreement, subject to any
applicable collective bargaining agreements.
Reliance has also agreed, and has agreed to cause RSAC, to
(1) subject to the limitations proscribed by
Section 280G of the Code, honor all of EMJs existing
employment, change of control, severance and termination
agreements, plans and policies in effect as of the date the
merger agreement was executed and (2) amend any of these
plans or arrangements, if necessary, so as to avoid liability
under Section 409A of the Code.
Reliance has agreed, and has agreed to cause RSAC, for one year
after the completion of the merger, to provide annual rates of
base salary or hourly wages, as applicable, and annual incentive
opportunities to EMJ employees who do not have an employment,
change of control, severance or termination agreement with EMJ,
where such benefits are at least as favorable in the aggregate
to these EMJ employees as in effect on the date of the merger
agreement.
For all purposes of determining eligibility to participate and
vesting and for purposes of benefit accrual, Reliance has also
agreed to credit each EMJ employee for his or her years of
service with EMJ and its subsidiaries before the completion of
the merger to the same extent such EMJ employee was entitled,
before the merger, to credit for that service under any similar
EMJ benefit plan, except to the extent that such credit would
result in a duplication of benefits or for credit for benefit
accrual purposes under any defined benefit plan.
|
|
|
Insurance and Indemnification |
Reliance has agreed to indemnify, defend and hold harmless, and
provide advancement of expenses to, all past and present
directors, officers and employees of EMJ and its subsidiaries
for acts or omissions occurring prior to the merger to the
fullest extent permitted by applicable law. In addition, for a
period of six years after the merger, Reliance has agreed to
cause RSACs certificate of incorporation and bylaws to
contain provisions regarding exculpation, indemnification and
advancement of expenses for officers, directors and employees
that overall are no less generous than those included in the
current EMJ certificate of incorporation and bylaws and to honor
all of EMJs obligations to indemnify all officers,
directors and employees for acts and omissions by such persons
prior to the completion of the merger to the extent such
obligations existed on January 17, 2006. These obligations
survive the effectiveness of the merger and shall continue in
full force and effect in accordance with the terms of the
relevant document until the expiration of the applicable statute
of limitations. For a period of six years after the merger,
Reliance has agreed to maintain the current policies of
directors and officers liability insurance and
fiduciary liability insurance maintained by EMJ with respect to
claims arising from or related to facts or events that occurred
prior to the merger and with a total insured coverage of
$50 million of directors and officers liability
insurance and $5 million of fiduciary liability insurance;
provided that, if the annual insurance premium payments for both
insured coverages exceed a specified amount, Reliance will
obtain a policy with the most advantageous terms available for
the maximum premium amount.
Each of Reliance and EMJ has agreed to take all required steps
to exempt any dispositions of EMJ common stock or acquisitions
of Reliance shares in connection with the merger from the
SECs short-swing profit rules.
84
Reliance will cause (1) the Reliance shares to be issued in
the merger to be approved for listing on the New York Stock
Exchange and (2) the EMJ common stock to be delisted from
the New York Stock Exchange and deregistered under the Exchange
Act.
EMJ will use reasonable efforts to cause each of its affiliates
to enter into a written agreement providing that they will not
offer or sell any of the Reliance shares issued to them in the
merger in violation of the Securities Act or the related SEC
rules.
Conditions to Closing
Each of the respective obligations of EMJ and Reliance to
complete the merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver of
various conditions, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the adoption of the merger agreement by EMJ stockholders; |
|
|
|
the absence of any law, order, injunction or legal restraint
prohibiting completion of the merger; |
|
|
|
the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period
under the HSR Act; |
|
|
|
the receipt of all other governmental agency consents,
approvals, permits, orders and authorizations required to
complete the merger other than those that the failure to make or
obtain would not render the merger illegal; |
|
|
|
the approval for listing on the New York Stock Exchange of the
Reliance common stock to be issued in the merger; |
|
|
|
the absence of any stop order issued by the SEC suspending the
effectiveness of this proxy statement/ prospectus and the
absence of any proceedings initiated or threatened by the SEC
for that purpose; |
|
|
|
the truth and correctness of the other partys
representation and warranties as of the date of the completion
of the merger, except where the failure of such representations
and warranties to be true and correct, individually or in the
aggregate, has not had and would not have a material adverse
effect, and the receipt of a certificate of an executive officer
of the other party to that effect; |
|
|
|
the other party having performed or complied with its agreements
and covenants in the merger agreement in all material respects,
and the receipt of a certificate of an executive officer of the
other party to that effect; |
|
|
|
the absence of any pending or threatened litigation with a
reasonable likelihood of success (1) challenging the merger
or seeking to obtain damages that are material to EMJ;
(2) seeking to limit in any material way the ownership or
operation by EMJ, Reliance or any of their respective
subsidiaries of any material portion of the business or assets
of such entities, or to compel such entities to dispose of or
hold separate a material portion of their business or assets as
a result of the merger; (3) seeking to impose limitations
on Reliances ownership and/or voting rights of EMJs
common stock; or (4) seeking to prohibit Reliances
control in any material respect of EMJs business or
operations; |
|
|
|
the absence of any material adverse effect on the other
party; and |
|
|
|
the receipt of an opinion from the partys counsel that the
merger will constitute a reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code. |
85
Amendments, Extensions and Waivers
Reliance and EMJ may amend the merger agreement at any time to
the extent legally permissible prior to completion of the
merger; provided, however, after the EMJ stockholders approve
the merger agreement, no amendment may be made that requires
further approval by stockholders under applicable law or the
rules of any relevant stock exchange. All amendments to the
merger agreement must be in writing signed by each party.
At any time prior to completion of the merger, any party to the
merger agreement may:
|
|
|
|
|
extend the time for the performance of any of the obligations or
other acts of the other party to the merger agreement; |
|
|
|
waive any inaccuracies in the representations and warranties of
the other party contained in the merger agreement or in any
document delivered pursuant to the merger agreement; and |
|
|
|
waive compliance by the other party with any of the agreements
or conditions contained in the merger agreement. |
All extensions and waivers must be in writing and signed by the
party against whom the waiver is to be effective.
Each of Reliance and EMJ will pay its own costs and expenses
incurred as a result of the merger and the merger agreement.
Reliance and EMJ will share equally in connection with any
filings required under the HSR Act. Reliance will be solely
responsible for the costs associated with the printing and
mailing of this proxy statement/ prospectus and the expenses
incurred in filing this proxy statement/ prospectus with the SEC.
86
MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
General
The following is a summary of the material United States federal
income tax consequences of the merger that are expected to apply
generally to a U.S. holder of EMJ common stock that
surrenders all of its common stock for shares of Reliance common
stock and cash in the merger. The summary is based on the Code,
United States Treasury regulations promulgated thereunder,
administrative rulings and court decisions in effect as of the
date hereof, all of which are subject to change or differing
interpretations (possibly with retroactive effect). The
consequences summarized below are based upon representation
letters from each of Reliance, EMJ and RSAC, which will be
reconfirmed prior to the merger.
For purposes of this summary, the term
U.S. holder means:
|
|
|
|
|
a citizen or resident of the United States; |
|
|
|
a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation for
United States federal income tax purposes, created or organized
under the laws of the United States or of any state or the
District of Columbia; |
|
|
|
a trust if it (1) is subject to the primary supervision of
a court within the United States and one or more United States
persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions
of the trust or (2) was in existence on August 20,
1996 and has a valid election in effect under applicable
Treasury regulations to continue to be treated as a United
States person; or |
|
|
|
an estate that is subject to United States federal income tax on
its income regardless of its source. |
If a partnership holds EMJ common stock, the tax treatment of a
partner of such partnership will generally depend on the status
of the partners and the activities of the partnership. A
U.S. holder that is a partner in a partnership which holds
EMJ common stock should consult its tax advisor.
This summary only addresses EMJ stockholders that hold their
shares of EMJ common stock as a capital asset within the meaning
of Section 1221 of the Code. Further, this summary does not
address all aspects of United States federal taxation that may
be relevant to an EMJ stockholder in light of such holders
particular circumstances or that may be applicable to holders
subject to special treatment under United States federal income
tax laws (including, for example, tax-exempt organizations,
dealers in securities or foreign currencies, banks, insurance
companies, financial institutions or persons that hold their EMJ
common stock as part of a hedge, straddle, constructive sale or
conversion transaction, holders subject to the alternative
minimum tax provisions of the Code, holders whose functional
currency is not the U.S. dollar, holders that exercise
appraisal rights, or holders who acquired their EMJ common stock
through the exercise of an employee stock option or otherwise as
compensation).
In addition, the following summary does not address the tax
consequences of the merger under state, local and non-United
States laws. Furthermore, the following summary does not address
any of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the tax consequences of transactions effectuated before, after
or at the same time as the merger, whether or not they are in
connection with the merger, including, without limitation,
transactions in which EMJ shares are acquired or Reliance shares
are disposed of; |
|
|
|
the tax consequences to holders of options issued by EMJ or
Reliance which are assumed, replaced, exercised or converted, as
the case may be, in connection with the merger; |
|
|
|
the tax consequences of the receipt of Reliance shares other
than in exchange for EMJ shares; or |
|
|
|
tax implications of a failure of the merger to qualify as a
reorganization. |
No ruling has been requested from the IRS regarding the
U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger. No
assurance can be given that the IRS would not assert, or that a
court would not sustain, a position contrary to any of the tax
consequences summarized below.
87
HOLDERS ARE URGED TO CONSULT WITH THEIR TAX ADVISORS
REGARDING THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE MERGER TO THEM, INCLUDING
THE EFFECTS OF UNITED STATES FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL, FOREIGN
AND OTHER TAX LAWS.
The merger is intended to qualify as a reorganization under
Section 368(a) of the Code for United States federal income
tax purposes. It is a condition to EMJs and
Reliances obligations to consummate the merger that each
of them receive an opinion from their respective tax counsel,
dated as of the closing date of the merger, to the effect that
the merger will be treated for federal income tax purposes as a
reorganization qualifying under the provisions of
Section 368(a) of the Code. Reliance and EMJ expect to be
able to obtain the tax opinions if, as expected, Reliance, EMJ
and RSAC are able to deliver customary representations to their
respective tax counsel, and there is no adverse change in
U.S. federal income tax law.
If any of the representations or assumptions upon which the
opinions are based is inconsistent with the actual facts
relating to the merger, the tax consequences of the merger could
be adversely affected. The determination by tax counsel as to
whether the merger will be treated as a
reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code will depend upon the facts and
law existing at the effective time of the merger. EMJ
stockholders should be aware that the tax opinions discussed in
this section are not binding on the IRS, the IRS could adopt a
contrary position and a contrary position could be sustained by
a court.
Assuming the merger qualifies as a reorganization within the
meaning of Section 368(a) of the Code, EMJ, Reliance and
RSAC will each be a party to the reorganization, and none of
EMJ, Reliance and RSAC will recognize any gain or loss solely as
a result of the merger. Additionally, the material United States
federal income tax consequences of the merger to
U.S. holders of EMJ common stock are, in general, as
follows:
Exchange of EMJ Common Stock for Reliance Common Stock and
Cash
An EMJ stockholder that receives a combination of Reliance
common stock and cash in exchange for all of its shares of EMJ
common stock will recognize gain (but not loss) in an amount
equal to the lesser of (1) the sum of the amount of cash
and the fair market value of the Reliance common stock received
in the merger minus the stockholders aggregate tax basis
in its EMJ common stock surrendered therefor and (2) the
amount of cash the stockholder receives in the merger.
Any gain recognized will be capital gain unless the EMJ
stockholders receipt of cash has the effect of a
distribution of a dividend, in which case the gain will be
treated as ordinary dividend income to the extent of the
holders ratable share of Reliances accumulated
earnings and profits, as calculated for U.S. federal income
tax purposes. For purposes of determining whether an EMJ
stockholders receipt of cash has the effect of a
distribution of a dividend, the EMJ stockholder will be treated
as if it first exchanged all of its EMJ common stock solely in
exchange for Reliance common stock and then Reliance immediately
redeemed a portion of that stock for the cash that the holder
actually received in the merger. Receipt of cash will generally
not have the effect of a distribution of a dividend to the EMJ
stockholder if such receipt is, with respect to the EMJ
stockholder, not essentially equivalent to a
dividend or substantially disproportionate,
each within the meaning of Section 302(b) of the Code. The
IRS has indicated in rulings that any reduction in the interest
of a minority shareholder that owns a small number of shares in
a publicly and widely held corporation and that exercises no
control over corporate affairs would result in capital gain (as
opposed to dividend) treatment under these rules. However, in
determining the interest of a shareholder in Reliance for
purposes of these rules, certain constructive ownership rules
must be taken into account. Any capital gain will be long-term
if the EMJ stockholders holding period for its EMJ common
stock is more than one year as of the date of the exchange.
An EMJ stockholders aggregate tax basis in the Reliance
common stock received in the merger (including any fractional
shares deemed received and exchanged for cash) will be equal to
the stockholders aggregate tax basis in its EMJ common
stock, decreased by the amount of any cash received and
increased by the amount of any gain recognized. An EMJ
stockholders holding period for Reliance
88
common stock received in the merger (including any fractional
shares deemed received and exchanged for cash) will include the
holding period of the EMJ common stock surrendered in the merger.
Cash in Lieu of Fractional Shares
A holder of EMJ common stock who receives cash in lieu of a
fractional share of Reliance common stock generally will be
treated as having received such fractional share in the merger
and then as having received cash in exchange for such fractional
share. Gain or loss generally will be recognized based on the
difference between the amount of cash received in lieu of the
fractional share and the tax basis allocated to such fractional
share of Reliance common stock. Subject to the discussion above
regarding possible dividend treatment, such gain or loss
generally will be long-term capital gain or loss if, as of the
effective date of the merger, the holding period for such shares
is greater than one year.
Backup Withholding and Information Reporting
In general, an EMJ stockholder receiving cash in the merger will
be subject to information reporting to the IRS. In addition,
backup withholding at the applicable rate (currently 28%) will
generally apply to cash payments if the exchanging EMJ
stockholder fails to provide an accurate taxpayer identification
number or fails to properly certify that it is not subject to
backup withholding (generally on an IRS
Form W-9). Certain
holders (including, among others, U.S. corporations) are
not subject to information reporting or backup withholding, but
they may still need to furnish an IRS
Form W-9 or
otherwise establish an exemption. Any amount withheld as backup
withholding from payments to an exchanging EMJ stockholder will
be creditable against the EMJ stockholders federal income
tax liability, provided that it timely furnishes the required
information to the IRS. EMJ stockholders should consult their
tax advisors as to their qualifications for exemption from
backup withholding and the procedure for obtaining an exemption.
The preceding discussion is intended only as a summary of
certain U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger
and does not purport to be a complete analysis or discussion of
all of the mergers potential tax effects. EMJ stockholders
are urged to consult their own tax advisors as to the specific
tax consequences to them of the merger, including tax return
reporting requirements, and the applicability and effect of
federal, state, local and other applicable tax laws.
89
THE VOTING AGREEMENT
The following description, which sets forth the material
provisions of the voting agreement under which the Kelso Funds
have, among other things, agreed to vote in favor of the merger
and the merger agreement, is subject to the full text of, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to, the voting agreement,
which is attached to this proxy statement/ prospectus as
Annex B and which is incorporated by reference in this
proxy statement/ prospectus. We urge you to read the voting
agreement carefully and in its entirety.
Reliance has entered into a voting agreement with each of the
Kelso Funds pursuant to which each Kelso Fund has agreed, among
other things, to vote all of their shares of EMJ common stock,
including shares of EMJ common stock acquired after the date and
during the term of the voting agreement, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
in favor of the adoption and approval of the merger agreement,
the merger and each of the other actions contemplated by the
merger agreement; |
|
|
|
against approval of any takeover proposal; and |
|
|
|
against any of the following actions (other than those actions
that relate to the merger): (1) any amendment of EMJs
charter documents, (2) any other action that is designed to
or would impede, interfere with, delay, postpone or materially
adversely affect the merger or any other transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement or (3) any change in
any form or manner of the voting rights of any class of capital
stock of EMJ. |
The voting agreement terminates upon the earliest to occur of
(1) the termination of the merger agreement, (2) the
effective time of the merger, (3) EMJs board of
directors withdrawing or adversely modifying its recommendation
of the merger and (4) upon notice by any Kelso Fund and
after any amendment or modification of the merger agreement that
extends the outside date or otherwise materially and adversely
affects such Kelso Fund in its capacity as a stockholder of EMJ.
The voting agreement prohibits each of the Kelso Funds from
selling or disposing of any shares or options to acquire shares
of EMJ common stock beneficially owned by these entities, except
for transfers to its general or limited partners and only if
such partner agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions of
the voting agreement.
Except as provided by the merger agreement and applicable law,
and except in connection with the exercise of the fiduciary
duties of an affiliate of the Kelso Funds as a director of EMJ,
each of the Kelso Funds, solely in its capacity as an EMJ
stockholder and not in any other capacity, has agreed that
neither it nor any of its officers, directors, employees,
advisors, agents, partners or other representatives will,
directly or indirectly:
|
|
|
|
|
initiate, negotiate, solicit, encourage or provide confidential
information to facilitate the submission of any takeover
proposal; |
|
|
|
enter into any agreement with respect to any takeover
proposal; or |
|
|
|
participate in any discussions or negotiations regarding, or
furnish to any person any information with respect to, or take
any other action to facilitate any inquiries or the making of
any proposal that constitutes, or may reasonably be expected to
lead to, any takeover proposal. |
In addition, each of the Kelso Funds has agreed to immediately
cease and cause to be terminated any discussions or negotiations
between such entity and any person that may be ongoing with
respect to any takeover proposal.
At the close of business on January 17, 2006, the date of
the merger agreement, the Kelso Funds owned
25,174,634 shares of EMJ common stock, representing
approximately 50.1% of the shares of EMJ common stock
outstanding on that date. As of the record date for EMJs
special meeting, the Kelso Funds owned 25,174,634 shares of
EMJ common stock, representing approximately 50.1% of the shares
of EMJ common stock outstanding on that date.
90
INFORMATION ABOUT RELIANCE
General
Reliance is one of the five largest metals service center
companies in the United States. Reliances network of 24
divisions, 21 operating subsidiaries and one 70%-owned company
operates more than 100 locations in 32 states, Belgium
and South Korea. Through this network, Reliance provides metals
processing services and distributes a full line of more than
90,000 metal products, including alloy, aluminum, brass, copper,
carbon steel, titanium, stainless steel and specialty steel
products, to more than 95,000 customers in a broad range of
industries. Reliance delivers products from facilities in
Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho,
Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland,
Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire,
New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon,
Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Washington
and Wisconsin. One of Reliances subsidiaries has a
location in South Korea that serves the Asian semiconductor
market. Another subsidiary opened a metals service center in
Belgium in January 2003 to service the European aerospace
market. In addition, Reliance, through its 70%-owned company,
has entered into an agreement to acquire a facility in the
Peoples Republic of China.
Reliance shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under
the symbol RS. Reliances principal executive
offices are located at 350 South Grand Avenue, Suite 5100,
Los Angeles, California 90071, and its telephone number is
(213) 687-7700 and its Website is located at
http://www.rsac.com. Information contained on Reliances
Website is not incorporated by reference into this proxy
statement/ prospectus.
Management and Additional Information
Certain information relating to executive compensation, various
Reliance benefit plans (including Reliances stock option
plans), voting securities, including information regarding the
principal holders of those securities, certain relationships and
related transactions and other matters regarding Reliance is
incorporated by reference or set forth in Reliances Annual
Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2004, which is incorporated by
reference in this proxy statement/ prospectus. EMJ stockholders
desiring copies of the Reliance Annual Report on
Form 10-K and the
other documents incorporated by reference in this proxy
statement/ prospectus may contact Reliance at its address or
telephone number indicated under Where You Can Find More
Information on page 117.
91
INFORMATION ABOUT EMJ
General
EMJ was formed on May 3, 1990, when affiliates of
Kelso & Companies Inc. acquired control of and combined
two leading metals distributors, EMJ (founded in 1921) and
Kilsby-Roberts Holding Co. (successor to C.A. Roberts Company,
founded in 1916). In connection with the combination of these
two companies, EMJ became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Holding.
On April 20, 2005, EMJ completed its merger and financial
restructuring, pursuant to which Holding was merged with and
into a wholly-owned subsidiary of EMJ. EMJ also closed its
initial public offering on April 20, 2005.
EMJ is a leading distributor of specialty metal bar and tubular
products used by North American manufacturing companies and has
been in business for over 80 years. EMJ purchases over
25,000 different metal products in large quantities from primary
producers, including a broad mix of carbon, alloy and stainless
steel and aluminum bar, tubular and plate products. EMJ sells
these metal products in smaller quantities to over 35,000
customers spanning various industries, including machine tools,
industrial equipment, transportation, fluid power, oil, gas and
energy, fabricated metal, and construction and agricultural
equipment. EMJ distributes its broad range of metal products and
provides its customers value-added metal processing and
inventory management services from its distribution network of
39 strategically located service and processing centers in the
United States and Canada.
EMJs metal processing services consist of cutting to
length, burning, sawing, honing, shearing, grinding, polishing
and performing other similar services on most of the metal
products it sells, all to customer specifications. As part of
EMJs inventory management services, EMJ schedules
deliveries in the quantities and at the times required by
just-in-time
manufacturing processes employed by a growing number of leading
manufacturing companies and provides its customers with an
on-time product delivery guarantee.
EMJ shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol JOR. The principal executive offices of EMJ
are located at 10650 Alameda Street, Lynwood, California 90262,
and its telephone number is (323) 567-1122 and its Website
is located at http://www.emjmetals.com. Information contained on
EMJs Website is not incorporated by reference into this
proxy statement/prospectus.
Management and Additional Information
Certain information relating to executive compensation, various
EMJ benefit plans (including EMJs stock option plans),
voting securities, including information regarding the principal
holders of those securities, certain relationships and related
transactions and other matters regarding EMJ is incorporated by
reference or set forth in EMJs Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended March 31, 2005, which is incorporated in this
proxy statement/ prospectus by reference. EMJ stockholders
desiring copies of EMJs Annual Report on
Form 10-K and the
other documents incorporated by reference in this proxy
statement/ prospectus may contact EMJ at its address or
telephone number indicated under Where You Can Find More
Information on page 117.
92
RELIANCE
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following unaudited pro forma combined financial statements
combine the historical consolidated balance sheets and
statements of income of Reliance and EMJ, giving effect to the
merger using the purchase method of accounting. Certain
historical balance sheet and income statement amounts of EMJ
have been reclassified to conform to the financial statement
presentation of Reliance.
We are providing the following information to aid you in your
analysis of the financial aspects of the merger. The balance
sheet information as of September 30, 2005 and the income
statement information for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 were derived from the unaudited
financial statements of Reliance and EMJ. The income statement
information for the year ended December 31, 2004 was
derived from the audited financial statements of Reliance and
the unaudited quarterly financial statements of EMJ. The
information should be read together with our historical
financial statements and related notes contained in the annual
reports and other information that we have filed with the SEC
and incorporated herein by reference. See Where You Can
Find More Information.
The unaudited pro forma combined balance sheet as of
September 30, 2005 gives effect to the merger as if it had
occurred on September 30, 2005. The unaudited pro forma
combined statements of income assume the merger was effected on
January 1, 2005 and January 1, 2004 for the pro forma
statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and
the 12 months ended December 31, 2004, respectively.
Other than a difference in accounting for stock-based
compensation reflected in the Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma
Combined Financial Statements, and the difference in the fiscal
year-ends, the accounting policies of Reliance and EMJ are
substantially comparable.
The unaudited pro forma combined financial information is for
illustrative purposes only and is based on available information
and assumptions that are believed to be reasonable as of the
date of this proxy statement/ prospectus. The financial results
may have been different had the companies always been combined
due to, among other factors, those factors discussed under the
section entitled Risk Factors on page 30. You
should not rely on the pro forma combined financial information
as being indicative of the historical results that would have
been achieved had the companies always been combined or the
future results that Reliance will experience. See
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements on page 28.
93
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
As of September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
Reliance | |
|
EMJ | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Combined | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
10,419 |
|
|
$ |
8,668 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,087 |
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
394,326 |
|
|
|
180,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
575,209 |
|
Inventories
|
|
|
367,112 |
|
|
|
251,467 |
|
|
|
84,500 |
(a) |
|
|
703,079 |
|
Prepaids and other current assets
|
|
|
17,631 |
|
|
|
11,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,262 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
24,573 |
|
|
|
30,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
814,061 |
|
|
|
483,449 |
|
|
|
84,500 |
|
|
|
1,382,010 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
470,924 |
|
|
|
124,581 |
|
|
|
226,949 |
(b) |
|
|
822,454 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
404,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384,685 |
(c) |
|
|
789,149 |
|
Net cash surrender value of life insurance policies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,509 |
|
Other assets (including intangibles)
|
|
|
38,767 |
|
|
|
9,288 |
|
|
|
56,737 |
(d) |
|
|
104,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
1,728,216 |
|
|
$ |
667,827 |
|
|
$ |
752,871 |
|
|
$ |
3,148,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities & Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
159,575 |
|
|
$ |
157,275 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
316,850 |
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
22,784 |
|
|
|
39,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,295 |
|
Accrued compensation and retirement costs
|
|
|
47,255 |
|
|
|
30,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,954 |
|
Accrued insurance costs
|
|
|
24,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,691 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138 |
|
Current maturities of long-term obligations
|
|
|
49,164 |
|
|
|
3,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
303,607 |
|
|
|
230,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
534,314 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
365,275 |
|
|
|
295,516 |
|
|
|
412,959 |
(e) |
|
|
1,073,750 |
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
5,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,542 |
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
16,030 |
|
|
|
13,656 |
|
|
|
4,145 |
(f) |
|
|
33,831 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
55,613 |
|
|
|
2,645 |
|
|
|
134,500 |
(g) |
|
|
192,758 |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
14,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,648 |
|
Shareholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common equity
|
|
|
321,947 |
|
|
|
360,466 |
|
|
|
(33,896 |
) (h) |
|
|
648,517 |
|
Retained earnings (losses)
|
|
|
645,905 |
|
|
|
(234,261 |
) |
|
|
234,261 |
(h) |
|
|
645,905 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(351 |
) |
|
|
(902 |
) |
|
|
902 |
(h) |
|
|
(351 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
967,501 |
|
|
|
125,303 |
|
|
|
201,267 |
|
|
|
1,294,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
1,728,216 |
|
|
$ |
667,827 |
|
|
$ |
752,871 |
|
|
$ |
3,148,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
(a) Inventories Represents the pro forma
adjustment to record inventories at fair market value based on
preliminary estimates.
(b) Property, Plant, &
Equipment Represents the pro forma adjustment to
record the estimated fair values of real and personal property
based upon preliminary estimates. The values of these assets are
subject to adjustments upon completion of third party valuations.
(c) Goodwill The estimated purchase
price of the acquisition is based upon a price of
$13.00 per share of EMJ common stock, payable approximately
half in cash and half in Reliance common stock. Each EMJ
shareholder will receive $6.50 in cash and a fraction of a
Reliance share, for each share of EMJ common stock. The value of
Reliance common stock issued for the purpose of the pro forma
purchase price allocation assumes a Reliance average price of
$70.01, resulting in 0.0928 of a Reliance share issued for each
EMJ share.
Under the purchase method of accounting, the purchase price is
allocated to EMJs net tangible and identifiable intangible
assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated
fair values as of September 30, 2005. The fair values
assigned to these assets and liabilities is preliminary and is
subject to change pending the completion of third-party fair
value appraisals as well as pending any additional information
that may come to our knowledge potentially impacting the fair
values of those assets and liabilities. The purchase price of
approximately $692.6 million, which includes the equity
value of the outstanding shares, the cash out of the Holding
options and the Reliance acquisition costs, was allocated to
EMJs assets and liabilities on a fair value basis and
resulted in estimated goodwill of approximately
$384.7 million.
(d) Other assets/ Identifiable intangible
assets Represents the pro forma adjustments to
record the estimated fair values of identifiable intangible
assets relating to tradenames, certain customer relationships or
other intangible assets from the acquisition based upon
preliminary estimates. The values of these assets are subject to
adjustments upon completion of third party valuations.
(e) Debt Represents the pro forma
adjustment for incremental borrowings on Reliances
existing line of credit to finance the cash portion of the total
purchase price consideration, the adjustment to record
EMJs senior secured notes at estimated fair market value,
and to reflect additional EMJ borrowings for their share of the
merger related costs. The final debt fair value determination
will be based on prevailing market interest rates at the
completion of the acquisition and the necessary adjustment will
be amortized as a reduction (in the case of a premium to book
value) or an increase (in the case of a discount to book value)
to interest expense over the remaining life of the individual
debt issues.
(f) Other long-term liabilities/ Pension and
Postretirement Benefit Obligations Represents
the pro forma adjustments to record pension and postretirement
benefit obligations at fair value, based upon actuarial reports
dated March 31, 2005. The final value determination of the
pension and postretirement benefit obligations may differ from
these estimates due to potential changes in discount rates and
the rate of return on plan assets up to the date of completion
of the merger.
(g) Deferred Income Taxes The deferred
tax liability represents the pro forma adjustment for the
additional book/tax differences created from the allocation of
purchase price to the fair values of the acquired assets and
liabilities assumed. These estimates are based on the estimated
prospective statutory tax rate of 40% for the combined company
and could change based on changes in the applicable tax rates
and finalization of the combined companys tax position.
(h) Shareholders Equity/ Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Loss Represents pro forma
adjustments to eliminate the historical shareholders
equity of EMJ and the issuance of 4,662,002 shares of
Reliance common stock in connection with the acquisition. This
assumes 50,237,094 shares of EMJ common stock outstanding
and an average closing price of Reliance common stock for the
pricing period of $70.01 per share.
95
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the nine months ended September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
Reliance | |
|
EMJ | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Combined | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts) | |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
2,498,373 |
|
|
$ |
1,313,189 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,811,562 |
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
2,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,147 |
(b) |
|
|
3,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,501,082 |
|
|
|
1,313,189 |
|
|
|
1,147 |
|
|
|
3,815,418 |
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown
below)
|
|
|
1,831,474 |
|
|
|
993,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,824,965 |
|
|
Warehouse, delivery, selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
375,613 |
|
|
|
191,912 |
(a) |
|
|
18,790 |
(b) |
|
|
586,315 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
34,806 |
|
|
|
8,283 |
|
|
|
15,603 |
(c) |
|
|
58,692 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
19,290 |
|
|
|
41,272 |
|
|
|
(8,532 |
) (b),(d) |
|
|
52,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,261,183 |
|
|
|
1,234,958 |
|
|
|
25,861 |
|
|
|
3,522,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest and income taxes
|
|
|
239,899 |
|
|
|
78,231 |
|
|
|
(24,714 |
) |
|
|
293,416 |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(6,271 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,271 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
233,628 |
|
|
|
78,231 |
|
|
|
(24,714 |
) |
|
|
287,145 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
88,779 |
|
|
|
(22,658 |
) |
|
|
42,994 |
(e) |
|
|
109,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
144,849 |
|
|
|
100,889 |
|
|
|
(67,708 |
) |
|
|
178,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders
|
|
$ |
144,849 |
|
|
$ |
100,889 |
|
|
$ |
(67,708 |
) |
|
$ |
178,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share diluted
|
|
$ |
4.38 |
|
|
$ |
2.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4.72 |
(f) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
33,062,949 |
|
|
|
39,529,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,724,951 |
(f) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share basic
|
|
$ |
4.40 |
|
|
$ |
2.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4.74 |
(f) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
32,888,726 |
|
|
|
36,951,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,550,728 |
(f) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
RELIANCE STEEL & ALUMINUM CO.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED STATEMENT OF INCOME
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
Reliance | |
|
EMJ | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Combined | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts) | |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
2,943,034 |
|
|
$ |
1,474,655 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,417,689 |
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
4,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,536 |
) (b) |
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,947,202 |
|
|
|
1,474,655 |
|
|
|
(3,536 |
) |
|
|
4,418,321 |
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown
below)
|
|
|
2,110,848 |
|
|
|
1,064,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,175,455 |
|
|
Warehouse, delivery, selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
483,887 |
|
|
|
270,174 |
(a) |
|
|
18,238 |
(b) |
|
|
772,299 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
44,627 |
|
|
|
11,576 |
|
|
|
20,804 |
(c) |
|
|
77,007 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
28,690 |
|
|
|
88,319 |
|
|
|
(48,745 |
) (b),(d) |
|
|
68,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,668,052 |
|
|
|
1,434,676 |
|
|
|
(9,703 |
) |
|
|
4,093,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest and income taxes
|
|
|
279,150 |
|
|
|
39,979 |
|
|
|
6,167 |
|
|
|
325,296 |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(9,182 |
|