sv1za
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
June 17, 2005
No. 333-125626
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
AMENDMENT NO. 1
to
Form S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
3714 |
|
41-1990662 |
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization) |
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
6530 West Campus Oval
New Albany, Ohio 43054
Telephone: (614) 289-5360
Telecopy: (614) 985-1842
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including
area code, of registrants principal executive offices)
Mervin Dunn
President and Chief Executive Officer
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.
6530 West Campus Oval
New Albany, Ohio 43054
Telephone: (614) 289-5360
Telecopy: (614) 985-1842
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of agent for service)
Copies of all communications, including communications
sent to agent for service, should be sent to:
|
|
|
Dennis M. Myers P.C.
Kirkland & Ellis LLP
200 East Randolph Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60601
Telephone: (312) 861-2000
Telecopy: (312) 861-2200 |
|
Kris F. Heinzelman, Esq.
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
Worldwide Plaza
825 Eighth Avenue
New York, New York 10019
Telephone: (212) 474-1000
Telecopy: (212) 474-3700 |
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: As soon as practicable after this Registration
Statement becomes effective.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the
following box: o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
please check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same offering.
o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to
Rule 434, please check the following box.
o
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until this Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission,
acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
The
information in this prospectus is not complete and may be
changed. We or the selling stockholders may not sell these
securities until the registration statement filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus
is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not
soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where
the offer or sale is not
permitted.
|
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED JUNE 17,
2005
7,868,446 Shares
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.
Common Stock
We are selling 1,500,000 shares of common stock and the
selling stockholders are selling 6,368,446 shares of common
stock. We will not receive any of the proceeds from the shares
of common stock sold by the selling stockholders.
Our common stock is listed on The Nasdaq National Market under
the symbol CVGI. The last reported sale price of our
common stock on June 16, 2005 was $20.08 per share.
The underwriters have an option to purchase a maximum of
1,180,267 additional shares from us to cover
over-allotments of shares.
Investing in our common stock involves risks. See Risk
Factors beginning on page 12.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting | |
|
|
|
Proceeds to | |
|
|
Price to | |
|
Discounts and | |
|
Proceeds to | |
|
Selling | |
|
|
Public | |
|
Commissions | |
|
Issuer | |
|
Stockholders | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Per Share
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Delivery of the shares of common stock will be made on or
about ,
2005.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
|
|
Credit Suisse First Boston |
Robert W. Baird & Co. |
The date of this prospectus
is ,
2005.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
You should rely only on the information contained in this
document or to which we have referred you. We have not
authorized anyone to provide you with information that is
different. This document may only be used where it is legal to
sell these securities. The information in this document may only
be accurate on the date of this document.
SUMMARY
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in
this prospectus but might not contain all of the information
that is important to you. Before investing in our common stock,
you should read the entire prospectus carefully, including the
Risk Factors section and the consolidated financial
statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
We conduct our business through our operating subsidiaries,
each of which is a direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. For purposes of this prospectus,
unless the context otherwise requires, all references herein to
our company, Commercial Vehicle Group,
we, us and our refer to
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries
and their predecessors after giving effect to the acquisitions
of substantially all of the assets and liabilities related to
Mayflower Vehicle Systems North American Commercial
Vehicle Operations and the stock of Monona Corporation, the
parent of Monona Wire Corporation, as described on page 5,
which we refer to as the Mayflower acquisition and
the MWC acquisition, respectively. Unless otherwise
indicated, statement of operations data included herein for 2004
and for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and presented
on a pro forma basis give effect to the Mayflower acquisition
and the MWC acquisition as if they had each occurred on
January 1, 2004. Original equipment manufacturers are
referred to herein as OEMs. Unless otherwise
indicated, the information contained in this prospectus assumes
that the underwriters over-allotment option is not
exercised.
Our Company
We are a leading supplier of fully integrated system solutions
for the global commercial vehicle market, including the
heavy-duty truck market, the construction and agriculture
markets and the specialty and military transportation markets.
As a result of our strong leadership in cab-related products and
systems, we are positioned to benefit from the increased focus
of our customers on cab design and comfort and convenience
features to better serve their end user, the driver. Our
products include suspension seat systems, interior trim systems
(including instrument panels, door panels, headliners, cabinetry
and floor systems), cab structures and components, mirrors,
wiper systems, electronic wire harness assemblies and controls
and switches specifically designed for applications in
commercial vehicles.
We are differentiated from suppliers to the automotive industry
by our ability to manufacture low volume customized products on
a sequenced basis to meet the requirements of our customers. We
believe that we have the number one or two position in most of
our major markets and that we are the only supplier in the North
American commercial vehicle market that can offer complete cab
systems including cab body assemblies, sleeper boxes, seats,
interior trim, flooring, wire harnesses, panel assemblies and
other structural components. We believe our products are used by
virtually every major North American commercial vehicle OEM,
which we believe creates an opportunity to cross-sell our
products and offer a fully integrated system solution.
We pursue growth in sales and earnings by offering our customers
innovative products and system solutions, emphasizing continuous
improvement in the operating performance of our businesses and
by acquiring businesses that expand our product range, augment
our system solution capabilities, strengthen our customer
relationships and expand our geographic footprint. In the past
four months, we have separately acquired two commercial vehicle
supply businesses that meet these acquisition criteria.
|
|
|
|
|
On February 7, 2005, we acquired substantially all of the
assets and liabilities related to Mayflower Vehicle
Systems North American Commercial Vehicle Operations
(Mayflower) for $107.5 million. This
acquisition makes us the only non-captive producer of steel and
aluminum cabs and sleeper box assemblies for the North American
Class 8 truck market. The Mayflower acquisition will allow
us to offer our truck customers a completely furnished vehicle
cab and provide us earlier visibility on cab structure designs
and concepts, which will provide us with advantages in our other
cab products. |
|
|
|
On June 3, 2005 we acquired the stock of Monona
Corporation, the parent of Monona Wire Corporation
(MWC), for $55.0 million. MWC specializes in
low volume electronic wire harnesses and instrument panel
assemblies and also assembles cabs for the construction market. |
1
|
|
|
|
|
The MWC acquisition will enhance our ability to offer integrated
electronics and instrument panel assemblies, expand our cab
assembly capabilities into new end markets and provide us with a
world class Mexican assembly operation strategically located
near several of our existing OEM customers. |
Approximately 59% of our pro forma 2004 sales were to the
leading heavy-duty truck OEMs, Freightliner (DaimlerChrysler),
PACCAR, International (Navistar) and Volvo/ Mack. The MWC
acquisition increases our presence in the construction and
agriculture market particularly at Caterpillar and
Deere & Co., as well as Oshkosh Truck Corporation, a
leader in manufacturing specialty, emergency and military
vehicles, which we believe are less cyclical than certain of our
other markets. Approximately 84% of our pro forma 2004 sales
were in North America, with the balance in Europe and Asia. The
following charts depict our 2004 pro forma net sales by product
category, end market served, and customer served.
Demand for commercial vehicles is expected to continue to
improve in 2005 due to a variety of factors, including a broad
economic recovery in North America, the need to replace aging
truck fleets as a result of under-investment, increasing freight
volumes and improving hauler profits. According to ACT Research,
the North American heavy-duty (Class 8) unit build rates
are expected to grow from 269,000 units in 2004 to over
341,000 units in 2009, a compound annual growth rate of 5%.
This trend is reflected in the North American heavy-duty
(Class 8) quarterly production of approximately
81,000 units in the three months ended March 31, 2005,
an increase of 48% from the same period in 2004. The medium-duty
truck, commercial and heavy equipment, and military and
specialty vehicle markets tend to be less cyclical than the
heavy-duty (Class 8) market and are growing due to a broad
economic recovery, improved technologies in commercial vehicles
and equipment and the acceleration of worldwide purchases due to
growth in the end markets served by our customers. The market
for construction equipment is particularly dependent on the
level of major infrastructure construction and repair projects
such as highways, dams and harbors, which is in the early stages
of growth due to broad economic recovery and developing market
expansion, particularly in Asia.
For the year ended December 31, 2004 and the three months
ended March 31, 2005, our sales were $380.4 million
and $152.4 million, respectively, and our net income was
$17.4 million and $10.9 million, respectively. Pro
forma sales for the year ended December 31, 2004 and the
three months ended March 31, 2005, would have been
$671.0 million and $200.3 million, respectively, and
pro forma net income would have been $28.8 million and
$13.3 million, respectively. At March 31, 2005, on a
pro forma basis after giving effect to the MWC acquisition, this
offering, the exercise of managements options to purchase
265,530 shares of our common stock and the application of
the net proceeds therefrom as described under Use of
Proceeds, we would have had total indebtedness of
$184.4 million and stockholders equity of
$144.5 million.
2
Our Competitive Strengths
We believe that our competitive strengths include the following:
Leading Market Positions and Brands. We believe that we
are the leading supplier of seating systems and interior trim
products, the only non-captive manufacturer of Class 8
truck body systems (which includes cab body assemblies), the
second largest supplier of wiper systems and mirrors for the
North American commercial vehicle market and the largest global
supplier of construction vehicle seating systems. Our products
are marketed under brand names that are well known by our
customers and truck fleet operators. These brands include KAB
Seating, National Seating, Trim Systems, Sprague Devices,
Sprague Controls,
Prutsmantm,
Moto
Mirrortm,
RoadWatch® and Mayflower®. The Mayflower and MWC
acquisitions gave us the capability to achieve market leadership
across a broader spectrum of commercial vehicle systems,
including complete truck cab assemblies and electrical wire
systems. We expect to benefit from leveraging our customer
relationships and dedicated sales force to cross-sell a broader
range of products and position ourselves as the leading provider
of complete cab systems to the commercial vehicle marketplace.
Comprehensive Cab Product and Cab System Solutions. We
believe that we offer the broadest product range of any
commercial vehicle cab supplier. We manufacture approximately 50
product categories, many of which are critical to the interior
and exterior subsystems of a commercial vehicle cab. In
addition, through our acquisitions of Mayflower and MWC, we
believe we are the only supplier worldwide with the capability
to offer complete cab systems in sequence, integrating interior
trim and seats with the cab structure and the electronic wire
harness and instrument panel assemblies. We also utilize a
variety of different processes, such as urethane molding, vacuum
forming and twin shell vacuum forming, that enable
us to meet each customers unique styling and cost
requirements. The breadth of our product offering enables us to
provide a one-stop shop for our customers, who
increasingly require complete cab solutions from a single supply
source. As a result, we believe that we have a substantial
opportunity for further customer penetration through
cross-selling initiatives and by bundling our products to
provide complete system solutions.
End-User Focused Product Innovation. A key trend in the
commercial vehicle market is that OEMs are increasingly focused
on cab design, comfort and features to better serve their end
user, the driver, and our customers are seeking suppliers that
can provide product innovation. We have a full service
engineering and product development organization that
proactively presents solutions to OEMs to meet these needs and
enables us to increase our overall content on current platforms
and models. Examples of our recent innovations that are expected
to result in better cost and performance parameters for our
customers include: a new high performance air suspension seating
system; a back cycler mechanism designed to reduce driver
fatigue; a RoadWatch® system installed in a mirror base to
detect road surface temperature; an aero-molded mirror; and a
low-weight, cost effective tubular wiper system design.
Flexible Manufacturing Capabilities and Cost Competitive
Position. Because commercial vehicle OEMs permit their
customers to select from an extensive menu of cab options, our
customers frequently request modified products in low volumes
within a limited time frame. We have a highly variable cost
structure and can efficiently leverage our flexible
manufacturing capabilities to provide low volume, customized
products to meet each customers styling, cost and
just-in-time delivery requirements. We have a
network of 27 manufacturing and assembly locations
worldwide. Several of our facilities are located near our
customers to reduce distribution costs and to maintain a high
level of customer service and flexibility.
Strong Relationships with Leading Customers and Major
Fleets. Because of our comprehensive product offerings, sole
source position for certain of our products, leading
Class 8 brand names and innovative product features, we
believe we are an important long-term supplier to all of the
leading truck manufacturers in North America and also a global
supplier to leading heavy equipment customers such as
Caterpillar, Oshkosh Truck, Deere & Co., Komatsu and
Volvo. In addition, through our sales force and engineering
teams, we maintain active relationships with the major truck
fleet organizations that are end users of our products such as
Yellow Freight, Swift Transportation, Schneider National and
Ryder
3
Leasing. As a result of our high-quality, innovative products,
well-recognized brand names and customer service, a majority of
the largest 100 fleet operators specifically request our
products.
Significant Barriers to Entry. We are a leader in
providing critical cab assemblies and components to long running
platforms. Considerable barriers to entry exist, including
significant capital investment and engineering requirements,
stringent OEM technical and manufacturing requirements, high
switching costs for OEMs to shift production to new suppliers,
just-in-time delivery requirements to meet OEM volume demand and
strong brand name recognition.
Proven Management Team. Our management team is highly
respected within the commercial vehicle market, and our six
senior executives have an average of 25 years of experience
in the industry. We believe that our team has substantial depth
in critical operational areas and has demonstrated success in
reducing costs, integrating business acquisitions and improving
processes through cyclical periods. In addition, we have added
significant management, technical and operations talent with our
recent acquisitions.
Our Business Strategy
In addition to capitalizing on expected growth in our end
markets, our primary growth strategies are as follows:
Increase Content, Expand Customer Penetration and Leverage
System Opportunities. We are the only integrated commercial
vehicle supplier that can offer complete modular cab systems. We
are focused on securing additional sales from our existing
customer base, and we actively cross-market a diverse portfolio
of products to our customers to increase our content on the cabs
manufactured by these OEMs. To complement our North American
capabilities and enhance our customer relationships, we are
working with OEMs as they increase their focus on international
markets. We are one of the first commercial vehicle suppliers to
establish operations in China and are aggressively working to
secure new business from both existing customers with Chinese
manufacturing operations and Chinese OEMs. We believe we are
well positioned to capitalize on the migration by OEMs in the
heavy truck and commercial vehicle sector towards commercial
vehicle suppliers that can offer a complete interior system.
Leverage Our New Product Development Capabilities. We
have made a significant investment in our engineering
capabilities and new product development in order to anticipate
the evolving demands of our customers and end users. For
example, we recently introduced a new wiper system utilizing a
tubular linkage system with a single motor that operates both
wipers, reducing the cost, space and weight of the wiper system.
Also, we believe that our new high performance seat should
enable us to capture additional market share in North America
and provide us with opportunities to market this seat on a
global basis. We will continue to design and develop new
products that add or improve content and increase cab comfort
and safety.
Capitalize on Operating Leverage. We continuously seek
ways to lower costs, enhance product quality, improve
manufacturing efficiencies and increase product throughput. Over
the past three years, we realized operating synergies with the
integration of our sales, marketing and distribution processes;
reduced our fixed cost base through the closure and
consolidation of several manufacturing and design facilities;
and have begun to implement our Lean Manufacturing and Total
Quality Production Systems (TQPS) programs. We
believe our ongoing cost saving initiatives and the
establishment of our sourcing relationships in China will enable
us to continue to lower our manufacturing costs. As a result, we
are well positioned to grow our operating margins and capitalize
on any volume increases in the heavy truck sector with minimal
additional capital expenditures. With the integration of
Mayflower and MWC, CVGs management will be pursuing cost
reduction and avoidance opportunities which include:
consolidating supplier relationships to achieve lower costs and
better terms, combining steel and other material purchases to
leverage purchasing power, strategic sourcing of products to
OEMs from new facility locations, implementing lean
manufacturing techniques to achieve operational efficiencies,
improving product quality and delivery and providing additional
capacity. Cost reductions will also target merging
administrative functions, including accounting, IT and corporate
services.
4
Grow Sales to the Aftermarket. While commercial vehicles
have a relatively long life, certain components, such as seats,
wipers and mirrors, are replaced more frequently. We believe
that there are opportunities to leverage our brand recognition
to increase our sales to the replacement aftermarket. Since many
aftermarket participants are small and locally focused, we plan
to leverage our national scale to increase our market share in
the fragmented aftermarket. We believe that the continued growth
in the aftermarket represents an attractive diversification to
our OEM business due to its relative stability as well as the
market penetration opportunity.
Pursue Strategic Acquisitions and Continue to Diversify
Sales. We will selectively pursue complementary strategic
acquisitions that allow us to leverage the marketing,
engineering and manufacturing strengths of our business and
expand our sales to new and existing customers. The markets in
which we operate are highly fragmented and provide ample
consolidation opportunities. The acquisition of Mayflower will
enable us to be the only supplier worldwide to offer complete
cab systems in sequence, integrating interior trim and seats
with the cab structure. The MWC acquisition will enable us to
provide integrated electronic systems into our cab products.
Each of these acquisitions has expanded and diversified our
sales to include a greater percentage to non-heavy truck
markets, such as the construction and specialty and military
vehicle markets.
Our Recent Acquisitions
On February 7, 2005, we acquired substantially all of the
assets and liabilities related to Mayflower Vehicle
Systems North American Commercial Vehicle Operations for
$107.5 million, which became a wholly owned subsidiary of
CVG. The Mayflower acquisition was funded through an increase
and amendment to our senior credit facility. Mayflower is the
only non-captive producer of complete steel and aluminum truck
cabs for the commercial vehicle sector in North America.
Mayflower serves the North American commercial vehicle sector
from three manufacturing locations, Norwalk, Ohio, Shadyside,
Ohio and Kings Mountain, North Carolina, supplying three major
product lines: cab frames and assemblies, sleeper boxes and
other structural components. Through the Mayflower acquisition
we believe we are the only supplier worldwide with the
capability to offer complete cab systems in sequence,
integrating interior trim and seats with the cab structure. The
acquisition gives us the leading position in North American cab
structures and the number two position in complete cab
assemblies, as well as full service cab and sleeper engineering
and development capabilities with a technical facility located
near Detroit, Michigan. In addition, the Mayflower acquisition
broadens our revenue base at International, Volvo/ Mack,
Freightliner, PACCAR and Caterpillar and enhances our
cross-selling opportunities. We anticipate that the Mayflower
acquisition will also provide significant cost saving
opportunities and our complementary customer bases will balance
revenue distribution and strengthen customer relationships. For
the year ended December 31, 2004, Mayflower recorded
revenues of $206.5 million and operating income of
$21.6 million.
On June 3, 2005, we acquired all of the stock of Monona
Corporation, the parent of MWC, for $55.0 million, and MWC
became a wholly owned subsidiary of CVG. The MWC acquisition was
funded through an increase and amendment to our senior credit
facility. MWC is a leading manufacturer of complex, electronic
wire harnesses and related assemblies used in the global heavy
equipment and specialty and military vehicle markets. It also
produces panel assemblies for commercial equipment markets and
cab frame assemblies for Caterpillar. MWCs wire harness
assemblies are critical, complex products that are the primary
electrical current carrying devices within vehicle systems. MWC
offers approximately 4,500 different wire harness assemblies for
its customers, which include leading OEMs such as Caterpillar,
Deere & Co. and Oshkosh Truck. MWC operates from
primary manufacturing operations in the U.S. and Mexico, and we
believe it is cost competitive on a global basis. The MWC
acquisition enhances our ability to offer comprehensive cab
systems to our customers, expands our electronic assembly
capabilities, adds Mexico manufacturing capabilities, and offers
significant cross-selling opportunities over a more diversified
base of customers. For the fiscal year ended January 31,
2005, MWC recorded revenues of $85.5 million and operating
income of $9.6 million.
5
Concurrent Senior Notes Offering
We intend to complete an unregistered offering of
$150.0 million of senior notes due 2013 during the same
period of time that we intend to complete the offering of common
stock contemplated by this prospectus. Should we complete the
senior notes offering, we intend to use the estimated net
proceeds therefrom of $144.7 million to repay indebtedness
under our senior credit facility. However, the completion of
this common stock offering is not connected with or contingent
upon the completion of the senior notes offering and there is no
guarantee that the senior notes offering will, in fact, be
completed. This prospectus shall not be deemed to be an offer to
sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities offered
in the senior notes offering.
Corporate Information
Commercial Vehicle Group was incorporated in the State of
Delaware on August 22, 2000. Our principal executive office
is located at 6530 West Campus Oval, New Albany, Ohio 43054, and
our telephone number is (614) 289-5360. Our website is
www.cvgrp.com. Information on our website is not a part of
this prospectus and is not incorporated in this prospectus by
reference.
6
The Offering
|
|
|
Common stock offered to the public
by us |
|
1,500,000 shares |
|
Common stock offered to the public by the selling stockholders |
|
6,368,446 shares |
|
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering |
|
19,753,027 shares |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We intend to use the net proceeds from the sale of
1,500,000 shares of common stock by us to repay
approximately $22.7 million of borrowings under our
revolving credit facility and for general corporate purposes.
See Use of Proceeds. We will not receive any of the
proceeds from the sales of our common stock by the selling
stockholders. We intend to use the proceeds from the exercise of
managements options to purchase 265,530 shares of our
common stock to repay approximately $1.5 million of
borrowings under our revolving credit facility. |
|
Nasdaq National Market symbol |
|
CVGI |
The number of shares that will be outstanding after this
offering excludes 1,000,000 shares of common stock reserved
for issuance under our equity incentive plan and
703,241 shares of common stock reserved for issuance under
outstanding options. See Management Employee
Benefit Plans.
Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the information under the heading
Risk Factors and all other information in this
prospectus before investing in our common stock.
7
Summary Historical and Pro Forma Consolidated Financial
Information
The following table summarizes selected historical and pro forma
consolidated financial data regarding our business and certain
industry information and should be read together with
Capitalization, Unaudited Pro Forma
Consolidated Financial Data, Selected Historical
Financial Data, Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
and the consolidated financial statements and the related notes
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
The historical financial data as of December 31, 2003 and
2004 and for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and
2004, are derived from our consolidated financial statements
that are included elsewhere in this prospectus, which financial
statements have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP
as indicated by their report thereon. The historical financial
data as of March 31, 2005 and for the three months ended
March 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005 have been derived
from our historical unaudited financial statements that are
included elsewhere in this prospectus. Results of operations for
an interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for
a full year. The North American Class 8 heavy-duty truck
production rates included in the Other Data section
set forth below and the pro forma financial data are all
unaudited.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated financial data is derived
from the unaudited pro forma consolidated financial statements
under Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial
Data. The unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of
operations data and other data for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and the three months ended March 31,
2005 have been prepared to give effect to:
|
|
|
|
|
the Mayflower acquisition; |
|
|
|
the MWC acquisition; |
|
|
|
the sale of 1,500,000 shares of common stock by us pursuant
to this offering and the application of the net proceeds
therefrom as described in Use of Proceeds; and |
|
|
|
the exercise of managements options to purchase 265,530
shares of our common stock and the application of the proceeds
therefrom as described in Use of Proceeds, |
as if each of these transactions had occurred on January 1,
2004.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet data as of
March 31, 2005 has been prepared to give effect to the MWC
acquisition, the sale of 1,500,000 shares of common stock
by us pursuant to this offering, the exercise of
managements options to purchase 265,530 shares of our
common stock and the application of the net proceeds therefrom
as described in Use of Proceeds, as if each of these
transactions had occurred on March 31, 2005.
8
The adjustments to the unaudited pro forma financial data are
based upon valuations and other studies that have not been
completed but that management believes to be reasonable. The
unaudited pro forma financial data are for informational
purposes only and do not purport to represent or be indicative
of actual results that would have been achieved had the
transactions described above actually been completed on the
dates indicated and do not purport to be indicative or to
forecast what our balance sheet data, results of operations,
cash flows or other data will be as of any future date or for
any future period. A number of factors may affect our actual
results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
Historical | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
March 31, | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
|
| |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004(1) | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share data) | |
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
298,678 |
|
|
$ |
287,579 |
|
|
$ |
380,445 |
|
|
$ |
670,958 |
|
|
$ |
85,990 |
|
|
$ |
152,415 |
|
|
$ |
200,347 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
249,181 |
|
|
|
237,884 |
|
|
|
309,696 |
|
|
|
562,723 |
|
|
|
70,503 |
|
|
|
126,163 |
|
|
|
166,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
49,497 |
|
|
|
49,695 |
|
|
|
70,749 |
|
|
|
108,235 |
|
|
|
15,487 |
|
|
|
26,252 |
|
|
|
33,505 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
23,952 |
|
|
|
24,281 |
|
|
|
28,985 |
|
|
|
37,314 |
|
|
|
7,497 |
|
|
|
9,549 |
|
|
|
11,444 |
|
Non cash option issuance charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,125 |
|
|
|
10,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
25,423 |
|
|
|
25,229 |
|
|
|
31,532 |
|
|
|
60,659 |
|
|
|
7,954 |
|
|
|
16,679 |
|
|
|
22,034 |
|
Other expense (income)
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
3,230 |
|
|
|
(1,247 |
) |
|
|
(482 |
) |
|
|
(3,270 |
) |
|
|
(2,881 |
) |
|
|
(2,881 |
) |
Interest expense
|
|
|
12,940 |
|
|
|
9,796 |
|
|
|
7,244 |
|
|
|
16,617 |
|
|
|
2,268 |
|
|
|
2,168 |
|
|
|
3,502 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,972 |
|
|
|
1,605 |
|
|
|
1,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of change in
accounting
|
|
|
11,385 |
|
|
|
9,231 |
|
|
|
23,930 |
|
|
|
42,919 |
|
|
|
8,956 |
|
|
|
17,392 |
|
|
|
21,413 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
5,235 |
|
|
|
5,267 |
|
|
|
6,481 |
|
|
|
14,076 |
|
|
|
3,407 |
|
|
|
6,506 |
|
|
|
8,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting
|
|
|
6,150 |
|
|
|
3,964 |
|
|
|
17,449 |
|
|
|
28,843 |
|
|
|
5,549 |
|
|
|
10,886 |
|
|
|
13,268 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
|
|
|
(51,630 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(45,480 |
) |
|
$ |
3,964 |
|
|
$ |
17,449 |
|
|
$ |
28,843 |
|
|
$ |
5,549 |
|
|
$ |
10,886 |
|
|
$ |
13,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
(3.29 |
) |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
(3.26 |
) |
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
1.12 |
|
|
|
1.66 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
0.59 |
|
|
|
0.66 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
13,827 |
|
|
|
13,779 |
|
|
|
15,429 |
|
|
|
17,195 |
|
|
|
13,779 |
|
|
|
17,987 |
|
|
|
19,753 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
13,931 |
|
|
|
13,883 |
|
|
|
15,623 |
|
|
|
17,389 |
|
|
|
13,885 |
|
|
|
18,297 |
|
|
|
20,063 |
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
Historical | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
March 31, | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
|
| |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$ |
8,809 |
|
|
$ |
28,216 |
|
|
$ |
41,727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
26,449 |
|
|
$ |
47,985 |
|
|
$ |
54,099 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
204,217 |
|
|
|
210,495 |
|
|
|
225,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
218,511 |
|
|
|
397,910 |
|
|
|
466,603 |
|
Total debt
|
|
|
127,202 |
|
|
|
127,474 |
|
|
|
53,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,555 |
|
|
|
153,485 |
|
|
|
184,364 |
|
Total stockholders investment
|
|
|
27,025 |
|
|
|
34,806 |
|
|
|
111,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,627 |
|
|
|
120,370 |
|
|
|
144,491 |
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(3)
|
|
$ |
34,105 |
|
|
$ |
33,335 |
|
|
$ |
39,099 |
|
|
$ |
74,476 |
|
|
$ |
10,014 |
|
|
$ |
19,441 |
|
|
$ |
25,666 |
|
Net cash provided by (used for):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$ |
18,172 |
|
|
$ |
10,442 |
|
|
$ |
34,177 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
$ |
6,035 |
|
|
$ |
10,058 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(4,937 |
) |
|
|
(5,967 |
) |
|
|
(8,907 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(840 |
) |
|
|
(109,241 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(14,825 |
) |
|
|
(2,761 |
) |
|
|
(28,427 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(7,667 |
) |
|
|
99,965 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
8,682 |
|
|
|
8,106 |
|
|
|
7,567 |
|
|
|
13,817 |
|
|
|
2,060 |
|
|
|
2,762 |
|
|
|
3,632 |
|
Capital expenditures, net
|
|
|
4,937 |
|
|
|
5,967 |
|
|
|
8,907 |
|
|
|
13,021 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
2,883 |
|
|
|
3,329 |
|
North American Class 8 heavy-duty truck production
(units)(4)
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
In the event that we complete our concurrent senior notes
offering, after giving further effect to such offering,
(a) our pro forma interest expense for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 would have been $20.5 million and
$4.5 million, respectively, (b) our pro forma net
income for the year ended December 31, 2004 and for the
three months ended March 31, 2005 would have been
$26.5 million and $12.7 million, respectively,
(c) our pro forma income tax expense for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 would have been $12.5 million and
$7.8 million, respectively, and (d) our pro forma
total indebtedness as of March 31, 2005 would have been
$189.6 million. However, the completion of this common
stock offering is not connected with or contingent upon the
completion of the senior notes offering and there is no
guarantee that the senior notes offering will, in fact, be
completed. |
|
|
|
(2) |
Earnings (loss) per share and weighted average common shares
outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and
2004 and the three months ended March 31, 2004 have been
calculated giving effect to the reclassification of our
previously outstanding six classes of common stock into one
class of common stock and, in connection therewith, a
38.991-to-one stock split. Earnings (loss) per share for all
periods were computed in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 128, Earnings Per
Share (SFAS No. 128). |
|
|
|
(3) |
EBITDA represents earnings before interest expense,
income taxes, depreciation, amortization, non-cash gain (loss)
on forward exchange contracts, loss on early extinguishment of
debt and an impairment charge associated with the adoption of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS No. 142). EBITDA does not represent
and should not be considered as an alternative to net income or
cash flow from operations, as determined by generally accepted
accounting principles. We present EBITDA because we believe that
it is widely accepted that EBITDA provides useful information
regarding our operating results. We rely on EBITDA primarily as
an operating performance measure in order to review and assess
our company and our management team. For example, our management
incentive plan is based upon the company achieving minimum
EBITDA targets for a given year. We also review EBITDA to
compare our current operating results with corresponding periods
and with other companies in our industry. We |
|
10
|
|
|
believe that it is useful to investors to provide disclosures of
our operating results on the same basis as that used by our
management. We also believe that it can assist investors in
comparing our performance to that of other companies on a
consistent basis without regard to depreciation, amortization,
interest or taxes, which do not directly affect our operating
performance. EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and
you should not consider it in isolation, or as a substitute for
analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these
limitations are: |
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA does not reflect our cash expenditures, or future
requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments; |
|
|
|
EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for,
our working capital needs; |
|
|
|
EBITDA does not reflect the significant interest expense, or the
cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal
payments, on our debt; |
|
|
|
although depreciation and amortization are noncash charges, the
assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be
replaced in the future, and EBITDA does not reflect any cash
requirements for such replacements; and |
|
|
|
other companies in our industry may calculate EBITDA differently
than we do, limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure. |
|
|
|
Because of these limitations, EBITDA should not be considered a
measure of discretionary cash available to us to invest in the
growth of our business. We compensate for these limitations by
relying primarily on our GAAP results and using EBITDA only
supplementally. See the consolidated statements of cash flows
included in our financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus. The following is a reconciliation of EBITDA to net
income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
Historical | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended March 31, | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
|
| |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
34,105 |
|
|
$ |
33,335 |
|
|
$ |
39,099 |
|
|
$ |
74,476 |
|
|
$ |
10,014 |
|
|
$ |
19,441 |
|
|
$ |
25,666 |
|
|
Add (subtract):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(8,682 |
) |
|
|
(8,106 |
) |
|
|
(7,567 |
) |
|
|
(13,817 |
) |
|
|
(2,060 |
) |
|
|
(2,762 |
) |
|
|
(3,632 |
) |
|
|
Noncash gain (loss) on forward exchange contracts
|
|
|
(1,098 |
) |
|
|
(3,230 |
) |
|
|
1,247 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
3,270 |
|
|
|
2,881 |
|
|
|
2,881 |
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(12,940 |
) |
|
|
(9,796 |
) |
|
|
(7,244 |
) |
|
|
(16,617 |
) |
|
|
(2,268 |
) |
|
|
(2,168 |
) |
|
|
(3,502 |
) |
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,972 |
) |
|
|
(1,605 |
) |
|
|
(1,605 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(5,235 |
) |
|
|
(5,267 |
) |
|
|
(6,481 |
) |
|
|
(14,076 |
) |
|
|
(3,407 |
) |
|
|
(6,506 |
) |
|
|
(8,145 |
) |
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
|
|
|
(51,630 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(45,480 |
) |
|
$ |
3,964 |
|
|
$ |
17,449 |
|
|
$ |
28,843 |
|
|
$ |
5,549 |
|
|
$ |
10,886 |
|
|
$ |
13,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
Source: Americas Commercial Transportation Research Co. LLC and
ACT Publications. |
11
RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the risks described below,
together with all of the other information in this prospectus,
before making a decision to invest in our common stock. If any
of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial
condition and results of operations could suffer. In this case,
the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may
lose all or part of your investment in our common stock.
Risks Related to Our Business and Industry
|
|
|
Volatility and cyclicality in the commercial vehicle
market could adversely affect us. |
Our profitability depends in part on the varying conditions in
the commercial vehicle market. This market is subject to
considerable volatility as it moves in response to cycles in the
overall business environment and is particularly sensitive to
the industrial sector, which generates a significant portion of
the freight tonnage hauled. Sales of commercial vehicles have
historically been cyclical, with demand affected by such
economic factors as industrial production, construction levels,
demand for consumer durable goods, interest rates and fuel
costs. For example, North American commercial vehicle sales and
production experienced a downturn from 2000 to 2003 due to a
confluence of events that included a weak economy, an oversupply
of new and used vehicle inventory and lower spending on
commercial vehicles and equipment. This downturn had a material
adverse effect on our business during the same period. We cannot
provide any assurances as to the length or ultimate level of the
current recovery in the commercial vehicle market.
|
|
|
Our customer base is concentrated and the loss of business
from a major customer or the discontinuation of particular
commercial vehicle platforms could reduce our sales. |
Sales to PACCAR and Freightliner accounted for approximately 28%
and 17%, respectively, of our revenue for 2004, and our ten
largest customers accounted for 72% of our revenue in 2004. On a
pro forma basis, sales to International, PACCAR, Freightliner
and Volvo/ Mack would have accounted for approximately 18%, 16%,
14% and 12%, respectively, of our revenue for 2004 and our ten
largest customers would have accounted for approximately 78% of
our revenue for 2004. The loss of any of our largest customers
or the loss of significant business from any of these customers
would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations. Even though we may be
selected as the supplier of a product by an OEM for a particular
vehicle, our OEM customers issue blanket purchase orders which
generally provide for the supply of that customers annual
requirements for that vehicle, rather than for a specific number
of our products. If the OEMs requirements are less than
estimated, the number of products we sell to that OEM will be
accordingly reduced. In addition, the OEM may terminate its
purchase orders with us at any time.
|
|
|
Our profitability would be adversely affected if the
actual production volumes for our customers vehicles is
significantly lower than we anticipated. |
We incur costs and make capital expenditures based upon
estimates of production volumes for our customers
vehicles. While we attempt to establish a price of our
components and systems that will compensate for variances in
production volumes, if the actual production of these vehicles
is significantly less than anticipated, our gross margin on
these products would be adversely affected. We enter into
agreements with our customers at the beginning of a given
platforms life to supply products for that platform. Once
we enter into such agreements, fulfillment of our purchasing
requirements is our obligation for the entire production life of
the platform, with terms ranging from five to seven years, and
we have no provisions to terminate such contracts. We may become
committed to supply products to our customers at selling prices
that are not sufficient to cover the direct cost to produce such
products. We cannot predict our customers demands for our
products either in the aggregate or for particular reporting
periods. If customers representing a significant amount of our
sales were to purchase materially lower volumes than expected,
it would have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
12
|
|
|
Commercial vehicle OEMs have historically had significant
leverage over their outside suppliers. |
The commercial vehicle component supply industry has
traditionally been highly fragmented and serves a limited number
of large OEMs. As a result, OEMs have historically had a
significant amount of leverage over their outside suppliers. Our
contracts with major OEM customers generally provide for an
annual productivity cost reduction. Historically, cost
reductions through product design changes, increased
productivity and similar programs with our suppliers have
generally offset these customer-imposed productivity cost
reduction requirements. However, if we are unable to generate
sufficient production cost savings in the future to offset price
reductions, our gross margin and profitability would be
adversely affected. In addition, changes in OEMs
purchasing policies or payment practices could have an adverse
effect on our business.
|
|
|
Integrating our operations with the Mayflower and MWC
operations may prove to be disruptive and could result in the
combined businesses failing to meet our expectations. |
We expect that the Mayflower and MWC acquisitions will result in
increased revenue and profit growth. We cannot be sure that we
will realize these anticipated benefits in full or at all.
Achieving the expected benefits from these acquisitions will
depend, in part, upon whether the operations and personnel of
Mayflower and MWC can be integrated in an efficient and
effective manner with our existing business. Our management team
may encounter unforeseen difficulties in managing the
integration of the three businesses. The process of integrating
three formerly separately operated businesses may prove
disruptive to all three businesses, may take longer than we
anticipate and may cause an interruption of and have a material
adverse effect on our combined businesses.
|
|
|
We may be unable to successfully implement our business
strategy. |
Our ability to achieve our business and financial objectives is
subject to a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our
control. For example, we may not be successful in implementing
our strategy if unforeseen factors emerge that diminish the
expected growth in the heavy truck market, or we experience
increased pressure on our margins. In addition, we may not
succeed in integrating strategic acquisitions and our pursuit of
additional strategic acquisitions may lead to resource
constraints which could have a negative impact on our ability to
meet customers demands, thereby adversely affecting our
relationships with those customers. As a result of such business
or competitive factors, we may decide to alter or discontinue
aspects of our business strategy and may adopt alternative or
additional strategies. Any failure to successfully implement our
business strategy could adversely affect our business, results
of operations and growth potential.
Developing product innovations has been and will continue to be
a significant part of our business strategy. We believe that it
is important that we continue to meet our customers
demands for product innovation, improvement and enhancement,
including the continued development of new-generation products,
design improvements and innovations that improve the quality and
efficiency of our products. However, such development will
require us to continue to invest in research and development and
sales and marketing. In the future, we may not have sufficient
resources to make such necessary investments, or we may be
unable to make the technological advances necessary to carry out
product innovations sufficient to meet our customers
demands. We are also subject to the risks generally associated
with product development, including lack of market acceptance,
delays in product development and failure of products to operate
properly. We may, as a result of these factors, be unable to
meaningfully focus on product innovation as a strategy and may
therefore be unable to meet our customers demands for
product innovation.
|
|
|
If we are unable to obtain raw materials at favorable
prices, it could adversely impact our results of operations and
financial condition. |
Numerous raw materials are used in the manufacture of our
products. Steel, aluminum, resin, foam and fabrics account for
the most significant components of our raw material costs.
Although we currently
13
maintain alternative sources for raw materials, our business is
subject to the risk of price increases and periodic delays in
delivery. For example, we purchase steel at market prices which,
during the past year have increased to historical high levels as
a result of a relatively low level of supply and a relatively
high level of demand. As a result we are currently being
assessed surcharges as well as price increases on certain
purchases of steel. If we are unable to purchase certain raw
materials required for our operations for a significant period
of time, our operations would be disrupted, and our results of
operations would be adversely affected. In addition, if we are
unable to pass on the increased costs of raw materials to our
customers, this could adversely affect our results of operations
and financial condition. Our operating results for the year
ended December 31, 2004 and the three months ended
March 31, 2005 were adversely affected by steel surcharges
that we are being assessed on certain of our purchases of steel.
The Mayflower acquisition has significantly increased our demand
for both steel and aluminum elevating our risk with respect to
increases in price or delays in delivery of these commodities.
|
|
|
Our inability to compete effectively in the highly
competitive commercial vehicle component supply industry could
result in the loss of customers, which would have an adverse
effect on our sales and operating results. |
The commercial vehicle component supply industry is highly
competitive. Our products primarily compete on the basis of
price, breadth of product offerings, product quality, technical
expertise and development capability, product delivery and
product service. Our competitors may foresee the course of
market development more accurately than we do, develop products
that are superior to our products, produce similar products at a
lower cost than we can or adapt more quickly to new
technologies, industry or customer requirements. As a result,
our products may not be able to compete successfully with the
products of these other companies, which could result in the
loss of customers and, as a result, decreased sales and
profitability.
|
|
|
Currency exchange rate fluctuations could have an adverse
effect on our sales and financial results. |
We have operations in Europe, Australia, Mexico and China, and
sales derived from these operations were approximately 28% and
24% of our revenues in 2004 on an actual and pro forma basis,
respectively. As a result, we generate a significant portion of
our sales and incur a significant portion of our expenses in
currencies other than the U.S. dollar. To the extent that
we are unable to match revenues received in foreign currencies
with costs paid in the same currency, exchange rate fluctuations
in any such currency could have an adverse effect on our
financial results. During times of a strengthening
U.S. dollar, our reported sales and earnings from our
international operations will be reduced because the applicable
local currencies will be translated into fewer
U.S. dollars. The converse is also true and the
strengthening of the European currencies in relation to the
U.S. dollar in recent years had a positive impact on our
foreign revenues in 2002, 2003 and 2004.
|
|
|
We may be unable to complete additional strategic
acquisitions or we may encounter unforeseen difficulties in
integrating acquisitions. |
The commercial vehicle component supply industry is beginning to
undergo consolidation as OEMs seek to reduce costs and their
supplier base. We intend to actively pursue additional
acquisition targets that will allow us to continue to expand
into new geographic markets, add new customers, provide new
product, manufacturing and service capabilities and increase
penetration with existing customers. However, we expect to face
competition for acquisition candidates, which may limit the
number of our acquisition opportunities and may lead to higher
acquisition prices. Moreover, acquisitions of businesses may
require additional debt financing, resulting in additional
leverage. The covenants of our senior credit facility may
further limit our ability to complete acquisitions. There can be
no assurance that we will find attractive acquisition candidates
or successfully integrate acquired businesses into our existing
business. If we fail to complete additional acquisitions, we may
have difficulty competing with more thoroughly integrated
competitors and our results of operations could be adversely
affected. To the extent that we do complete additional
acquisitions, if the expected synergies from such acquisitions
do not materialize or we fail to
14
successfully integrate such new businesses into our existing
businesses, our results of operations could also be adversely
affected.
|
|
|
We may be subject to product liability claims, recalls or
warranty claims, which could be expensive, damage our reputation
and result in a diversion of management resources. |
As a supplier of products and systems to commercial vehicle
OEMs, we face an inherent business risk of exposure to product
liability claims in the event that our products, or the
equipment into which our products are incorporated, malfunction
and result in personal injury or death. Product liability claims
could result in significant losses as a result of expenses
incurred in defending claims or the award of damages.
In addition, we may be required to participate in recalls
involving systems or components sold by us if any prove to be
defective, or we may voluntarily initiate a recall or make
payments related to such claims as a result of various industry
or business practices or the need to maintain good customer
relationships. Such a recall would result in a diversion of
management resources. While we do maintain product liability
insurance, we cannot assure you that it will be sufficient to
cover all product liability claims, that such claims will not
exceed our insurance coverage limits or that such insurance will
continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at
all. Any product liability claim brought against us could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Moreover, we warrant the workmanship and materials of many of
our products under limited warranties and have entered into
warranty agreements with certain OEMs that warranty certain of
our products in the hands of these OEMs customers, in some
cases for as long as six years. Accordingly, we are subject to
risk of warranty claims in the event that our products do not
conform to our customers specifications, or, in some cases
in the event that our products do not conform with their
customers expectations. It is possible for warranty claims
to result in costly product recalls, significant repair costs
and damage to our reputation, all of which would adversely
affect our results of operations.
|
|
|
We may be adversely impacted by work stoppages and other
labor matters. |
The hourly workforces at our Norwalk, Ohio and Shadyside, Ohio
facilities and Mexico operations are unionized. The 1,934
unionized employees at these facilities represented
approximately 38% of our total employees as of December 31,
2004 on a pro forma basis for the Mayflower and the MWC
acquisitions. The Norwalk, Ohio and Shadyside, Ohio facilities
were acquired by us in connection with the Mayflower acquisition
and the Mexican operations were acquired by us in connection
with the MWC acquisition. We have no operating history with
these work forces or prior relationship with the unions which
represent them. While neither Mayflower nor MWC has experienced
any material strikes, lockouts or work stoppages in the last
three years, there can be no assurance that our relationships
with these workforces and their unions will be as amicable or
that we will not encounter strikes, further unionization efforts
or other types of conflicts with labor unions or our employees.
We have experienced limited unionization efforts at certain of
our other North American facilities from time to time. In
addition, approximately 43% of our employees at our United
Kingdom operations are represented by a shop steward committee,
which may seek to limit our flexibility in our relationship with
these employees. We cannot assure you that we will not encounter
future unionization efforts or other types of conflicts with
labor unions or our employees.
Many of our OEM customers and their suppliers also have
unionized work forces. Work stoppages or slow-downs experienced
by OEMs or their other suppliers could result in slow-downs or
closures of assembly plants where our products are included in
assembled commercial vehicles. In the event that one or more of
our customers or their suppliers experience a material work
stoppage, such work stoppage could have a material adverse
effect on our business.
|
|
|
Our products may be rendered less attractive by changes in
competitive technologies. |
Changes in competitive technologies may render certain of our
products less attractive. Our ability to anticipate changes in
technology and to successfully develop and introduce new and
enhanced products on
15
a timely basis will be a significant factor in our ability to
remain competitive. There can be no assurance that we will be
able to achieve the technological advances that may be necessary
for us to remain competitive. We are also subject to the risks
generally associated with new product introductions and
applications, including lack of market acceptance, delays in
product development and failure to operate properly.
|
|
|
Our continued success depends to some degree on our
ability to protect our intellectual property. |
Our success depends to some degree on our ability to protect our
intellectual property and to operate without infringing on the
proprietary rights of third parties. While we have been issued
patents and have registered trademarks with respect to many of
our products, our competitors could independently develop
similar or superior products or technologies, duplicate our
designs, trademarks, processes or other intellectual property or
design around any processes or designs on which we have or may
obtain patents or trademark protection. In addition, it is
possible that third parties may have or acquire licenses for
other technology or designs that we may use or desire to use, so
that we may need to acquire licenses to, or to contest the
validity of, such patents or trademarks of third parties. Such
licenses may not be made available to us on acceptable terms, if
at all, and we may not prevail in contesting the validity of
third party rights.
In addition to patent and trademark protection, we also protect
trade secrets, know-how and other confidential information
against unauthorized use by others or disclosure by persons who
have access to them, such as our employees, through contractual
arrangements. These agreements may not provide meaningful
protection for our trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary
information in the event of any unauthorized use,
misappropriation or disclosure of such trade secrets, know-how
or other proprietary information. If we are unable to maintain
the proprietary nature of our technologies, our sales could be
materially adversely affected. See Business
Intellectual Property.
|
|
|
We depend on the service of key individuals, the loss of
whom could materially harm our business. |
Our success will depend, in part, on the efforts of our
executive officers and other key employees, including Mervin
Dunn, our Chief Executive Officer; Gerald L. Armstrong,
President CVG Americas; Gordon Boyd,
President CVG International; Chad M. Utrup, our
Chief Financial Officer and Jim Williams, Vice President of
Human Resources. Although we do not anticipate that we will have
to replace any of our executive officers in the near future, the
loss of the services of any of our key employees could have a
material adverse affect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition. See Management
Employment Agreements.
|
|
|
We may be adversely affected by the impact of
environmental and safety regulations. |
We are subject to foreign, federal, state, and local laws and
regulations governing the protection of the environment and
occupational health and safety, including laws regulating air
emissions, wastewater discharges, the generation, storage,
handling, use and transportation of hazardous materials; the
emission and discharge of hazardous materials into the soil,
ground or air; and the health and safety of our colleagues. We
are also required to obtain permits from governmental
authorities for certain of our operations. We cannot assure you
that we are, or have been, in complete compliance with such
laws, regulations and permits. If we violate or fail to comply
with these laws, regulations or permits, we could be fined or
otherwise sanctioned by regulators. In some instances, such a
fine or sanction could have a material adverse effect on us. The
environmental laws to which we are subject have become more
stringent over time, and we could incur material expenses in the
future to comply with environmental laws. We are also subject to
laws imposing liability for the cleanup of contaminated
property. Under these laws, we could be held liable for costs
and damages relating to contamination at our past or present
facilities and at third party sites to which we sent waste
containing hazardous substances. The amount of such liability
could be material. We cannot completely eliminate the risk of
contamination or injury resulting from exposure to hazardous
materials, and we could incur material liability as a result of
any such contamination or injury.
16
|
|
|
We may be adversely affected by the impact of government
regulations on our OEM customers. |
Although the products we manufacture and supply to commercial
vehicle OEMs are not subject to significant government
regulation, our business is indirectly impacted by the extensive
governmental regulation applicable to commercial vehicle OEMs.
These regulations primarily relate to emissions and noise
standards imposed by the Environmental Protection Agency, state
regulatory agencies, such as the California Air Resources Board
(CARB), and other regulatory agencies around the
world. Commercial vehicle OEMs are also subject to the National
Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act and Federal Motor Vehicle
Safety Standards promulgated by the National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration. Changes in emission standards and other
proposed governmental regulations could impact the demand for
commercial vehicles and, as a result, indirectly impact our
operations. For example, new emission standards governing
heavy-duty diesel engines that went into effect in the United
States on October 1, 2002 resulted in significant purchases
of new trucks by fleet operators prior to such date and reduced
short term demand for such trucks in periods immediately
following such date. New emission standards for truck engines
used in Class 5 to 8 trucks imposed by the EPA and
CARB are scheduled to come into effect during 2007. To the
extent that current or future governmental regulation has a
negative impact on the demand for commercial vehicles, our
business, financial condition or results of operations could be
adversely affected. See Business Government
Regulation.
|
|
|
We will be exposed to risks relating to evaluations of
controls required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. |
We are in the process of evaluating our internal controls over
financial reporting to allow management to report on, and our
independent registered public accounting firm to attest to, our
internal controls. We will be performing the system and process
evaluation and testing (and any necessary remediation) required
to comply with the management certification and auditor
attestation requirements of Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act. While we anticipate being able to fully
implement the requirements relating to internal controls and all
other aspects of Section 404 by our December 31, 2005
deadline, we cannot be certain as to the timing of completion of
our evaluation, testing and remediation actions or the impact of
the same on our operations since there is presently no precedent
available by which to measure compliance adequacy. If we are not
able to implement the requirements of Section 404 in a
timely manner or with adequate compliance, we might be subject
to sanctions or investigation by regulatory authorities, such as
the SEC or The Nasdaq National Market. Any such action could
adversely affect our financial results or investors
confidence in our company, and could cause our stock price to
fall. In addition, our controls and procedures may not comply
with all the relevant rules and regulations of the SEC and The
Nasdaq National Market. If we fail to develop and maintain
effective controls and procedures, we may be unable to provide
financial information in a timely and reliable manner.
|
|
|
Equipment failures, delays in deliveries or catastrophic
loss at any of our facilities could lead to production or
service curtailments or shutdowns. |
We manufacture or assemble our products at 27 facilities
worldwide. An interruption in production or service capabilities
at any of these facilities as a result of equipment failure or
other reasons could result in our inability to produce our
products, which would reduce our net sales and earnings for the
affected period. In the event of a stoppage in production at any
of our facilities, even if only temporary, or if we experience
delays as a result of events that are beyond our control,
delivery times to our customers could be severely affected. Any
significant delay in deliveries to our customers could lead to
increased returns or cancellations and cause us to lose future
sales. Our facilities are also subject to the risk of
catastrophic loss due to unanticipated events such as fires,
explosions or violent weather conditions. We may experience
plant shutdowns or periods of reduced production as a result of
equipment failure, delays in deliveries or catastrophic loss,
which could have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations or financial condition.
17
|
|
|
The reliability of market and industry data included in
this prospectus may be uncertain. |
This prospectus contains market and industry data, primarily
from reports published by ACT Research and from internal company
surveys, studies and research, related to the truck components
industry and its segments, as well as the truck industry in
general. This data includes estimates and forecasts regarding
future growth in these industries, specifically data related to
North American truck production, truck freight growth and the
historical average age of active heavy-duty trucks. Such data
has been published in industry publications that typically
indicate that they have derived the data from sources believed
to be reasonable, but do not guarantee the accuracy or
completeness of the data. While we believe these industry
publications to be reliable, we have not independently verified
the data or any of the assumptions on which the estimates and
forecasts are based. Similarly, internal company surveys,
studies and research, which we believe are reliable, have not
been verified by any independent sources. The failure of the
truck industry and/or the truck components industry to continue
to grow as forecasted may have a material adverse effect on our
business and the market price of our common stock.
|
|
|
Our indebtedness could adversely affect our financial
condition and make it more difficult to implement our business
strategy. |
As of March 31, 2005, on a pro forma basis, we would have
had total indebtedness of $184.4 million, or approximately
56% of our total capitalization.
Our indebtedness could:
|
|
|
|
|
make us more vulnerable to unfavorable economic conditions or
changes in our industry; |
|
|
|
make it more difficult to obtain additional financing in the
future for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions
or other general corporate purposes; |
|
|
|
make it more difficult to pursue strategic acquisitions; |
|
|
|
require us to dedicate a portion of our cash flow from
operations for making payments on our indebtedness, which would
prevent us from using it for other purposes; and |
|
|
|
make us susceptible to fluctuations in market interest rates
that affect the cost of our borrowings to the extent that our
variable rate indebtedness is not covered by interest rate hedge
agreements. |
|
|
|
Restrictions in our senior credit facility limit our
ability to incur additional debt, make acquisitions and make
other investments. |
Our senior credit facility contains covenants that limit our
ability to incur indebtedness, restrict our ability to make
distributions to stockholders, acquire other businesses, make
capital expenditures and impose various other restrictions. In
addition, the senior credit facility requires us to maintain
various financial ratios, which are likely to become more
restrictive over time. If we do not comply with such covenants
or satisfy such ratios, our lenders could declare a default
under this senior credit facility, and our indebtedness could be
declared immediately due and payable. Our ability to comply with
the provisions of this senior credit facility may be affected by
changes in economic or business conditions beyond our control.
In addition, these covenants could affect our ability to operate
our business and may limit our ability to take advantage of
potential business opportunities as they arise.
|
|
|
We are subject to certain risks associated with our
foreign operations. |
We have operations in Europe, Australia, Mexico and China.
Collectively, in 2004 sales derived from these operations
accounted for approximately 28% of our revenues on an actual
basis and, on a pro forma basis, would have accounted for 24% of
our revenues. Certain risks are inherent in international
operations, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the difficulty of enforcing agreements and collecting
receivables through certain foreign legal systems; |
18
|
|
|
|
|
foreign customers, who may have longer payment cycles than
customers in the United States; |
|
|
|
tax rates in certain foreign countries, which may exceed those
in the United States and foreign earnings may be subject to
withholding requirements or the imposition of tariffs, exchange
controls or other restrictions, including restrictions on
repatriation; |
|
|
|
intellectual property protection difficulties; |
|
|
|
general economic and political conditions in countries where we
operate, which may have an adverse effect on our operations in
those countries; |
|
|
|
the difficulties associated with managing a large organization
spread throughout various countries; and |
|
|
|
complications in complying with a variety of foreign laws and
regulations, which may conflict with United States law. |
As we continue to expand our business globally, our success will
be dependent, in part, on our ability to anticipate and
effectively manage these and other risks associated with foreign
operations. We cannot assure you that these and other factors
will not have a material adverse effect on our international
operations or our business, financial condition or results of
operations as a whole.
Risks Relating to this Offering
|
|
|
Future sales of our common stock, including the shares
purchased in this offering, may depress our stock price. |
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in
the public market by our stockholders after this offering, sales
of our common stock by our management or the perception that
such sales are likely to occur, could depress the market price
of our common stock and could impair our ability to raise
capital through the sale of additional equity securities. Upon
completion of this offering, we will have outstanding
19,753,027 shares of common stock, assuming no exercise of
the underwriters over-allotment option. Of these shares,
the 7,868,446 shares of common stock sold in this offering
and the 10,284,500 shares of common stock issued in our
initial public offering will be freely tradable, without
restriction, in the public market.
Upon completion of this offering there will be
1,244,289 shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise
of outstanding options issued to our management team. To the
extent that such options are exercised there will be further
dilution to our new investors. See Management
Employee Benefit Plans. After the completion of this
offering, holders of approximately 1.5 million shares of
our common stock will be entitled to certain rights with respect
to the registration of such shares under the Securities Act. See
Shares Eligible for Future Sale.
We may issue shares of our common stock from time to time as
consideration for or to finance future acquisitions and
investments. In the event any such acquisition or investment is
significant, the number of shares of our common stock, or the
number or aggregate principal amount, as the case may be, of
other securities that we may issue may in turn be significant.
In addition, we may also grant registration rights covering
those shares of our common stock or other securities in
connection with any such acquisitions and investments.
|
|
|
The market price of our common stock may be volatile,
which could cause the value of your investment to
decline. |
Securities markets worldwide experience significant price and
volume fluctuations. This market volatility, as well as general
economic, market or political conditions, could reduce the
market price of our common stock in spite of our operating
performance. In addition, our operating results could be below
the expectations of public market analysts and investors, and in
response, the market price of our common
19
stock could decrease significantly. You may be unable to resell
your shares of our common stock at or above the public offering
price.
|
|
|
Provisions in our charter documents and Delaware law could
discourage potential acquisition proposals, could delay, deter
or prevent a change in control and could limit the price certain
investors might be willing to pay for our stock. |
Certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation and
by-laws may inhibit changes in control of our company not
approved by our board of directors. These provisions include:
|
|
|
|
|
a classified board of directors with staggered terms; |
|
|
|
a prohibition on stockholder action through written consents; |
|
|
|
a requirement that special meetings of stockholders be called
only by the board of directors; |
|
|
|
advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and
director nominations; |
|
|
|
limitations on the ability of stockholders to amend, alter or
repeal the by-laws; and |
|
|
|
the authority of the board of directors to issue, without
stockholder approval, preferred stock with such terms as the
board of directors may determine and additional shares of our
common stock. |
In addition, Section 203 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law prevents us from engaging in a business
combination with a person who becomes a 15% or greater
stockholder, for a period of three years from the date such
person acquired such status, unless certain board or stockholder
approvals are obtained. These provisions could limit the price
that certain investors might be willing to pay in the future for
shares of our common stock.
|
|
|
Ownership change may limit our ability to use certain
losses for U.S. federal income tax purposes and may
increase our tax liability. |
The transactions contemplated herein may result in an
ownership change within the meaning of the
U.S. federal income tax laws addressing net operating loss
carryforwards, alternative minimum tax credits and other similar
tax attributes. As a result of such ownership change, as well as
any prior ownership changes, there may be specific limitations
on our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and
other tax attributes from periods prior to this offering. It is
possible in the future that such limitations could limit our
ability to utilize such tax attributes and, therefore, result in
an increase in our U.S. federal income tax liability. Such
an increase would reduce the funds available for the payments of
dividends and might require us to reduce or eliminate the
dividends on our common stock.
20
CAUTIONARY NOTICE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
These statements may be found throughout this prospectus,
particularly under the headings Summary, Risk
Factors, Dividend Policy,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and
Business, among others. Forward-looking statements
typically are identified by the use of terms such as
may, will, should,
expect, anticipate, believe,
estimate, intend and similar words,
although some forward-looking statements are expressed
differently. You should consider statements that contain these
words carefully because they describe our expectations, plans,
strategies and goals and beliefs concerning future business
conditions, our results of operations, financial position, and
our business outlook or state other forward-looking
information based on currently available information. The
factors listed above under the heading Risk Factors
and in the other sections of this prospectus provide a
discussion of the most significant risks, uncertainties and
events that could cause our actual results to differ materially
from the expectations expressed in our forward-looking
statements.
The forward-looking statements made in this prospectus relate
only to events as of the date on which the statements are made.
We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking
statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on
which the statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of
unanticipated events, except to the extent required by
applicable securities law.
21
USE OF PROCEEDS
We estimate that our net proceeds from the sale of
1,500,000 shares of common stock in this offering will be
approximately $22.7 million, after deducting underwriting
discounts and commissions and other offering-related expenses.
We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering to reduce
our borrowings under our revolving credit facility. We intend to
use the remaining net proceeds from this offering for general
corporate purposes.
We will not receive any of the proceeds from the selling
stockholders sale of 6,368,446 shares of common stock
in the offering. We expect to receive proceeds of approximately
$1.5 million from the payment by members of our management
of the exercise price of options to purchase 265,530 shares
of our common stock that they intend to exercise in connection
with this offering. We intend to use this amount to reduce our
borrowings under our revolving credit facility. See
Management Management Stock Option Plan.
Affiliates of Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, one of the
underwriters in this offering, are selling shares of common
stock in this offering. See Selling Stockholders and
Underwriting.
As of March 31, 2005, borrowings under our senior credit
facility were comprised of $5.9 million of revolving credit
borrowings, bearing interest at a weighted average rate of 6.7%,
and a $141.1 million term loan, bearing interest at a
weighted average rate of 6.6%, which included borrowings of
approximately $106.4 million to fund substantially all of
the purchase price for the Mayflower acquisition. The revolving
credit facility is available until January 31, 2010 and the
term loans are due and payable on December 31, 2010. We
used additional revolving credit borrowings of approximately
$58.0 million under our senior credit facility to fund
substantially all of the purchase price and related expenses for
the MWC acquisition.
DIVIDEND POLICY
We have not in the past paid, and do not expect for the
foreseeable future to pay, dividends on our common stock.
Instead, we anticipate that all of our earnings in the
foreseeable future will be used in the operation and growth of
our business. The payment of dividends by us to holders of our
common stock is limited under the terms of our senior credit
facility. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at
the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon,
among other factors, our results of operations, financial
condition, capital requirements, contractual restrictions and
any other considerations as our board of directors may determine.
22
PRICE RANGE OF COMMON STOCK
Our common stock has listed on The Nasdaq National Market since
August 5, 2004, under the symbol CVGI. The
following table sets forth for the periods indicated the high
and low sales prices per share for our common stock as reported
on The Nasdaq National Market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third quarter (beginning August 5, 2004)
|
|
$ |
16.82 |
|
|
$ |
12.95 |
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
$ |
21.90 |
|
|
$ |
14.50 |
|
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$ |
24.38 |
|
|
$ |
18.25 |
|
Second quarter (through June 16, 2005)
|
|
$ |
21.74 |
|
|
$ |
16.51 |
|
The last reported sale price of our common stock on
June 16, 2005 was $20.08 per share. As of
April 27, 2005, there were approximately 63 holders of
record and an estimated 1,050 beneficial owners of our common
stock.
23
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our cash and cash equivalents and
capitalization as of March 31, 2005 on (1) an actual
basis, (2) a pro forma basis giving effect to the MWC
acquisition and (3) a pro forma basis as further adjusted
to give effect to the sale of 1,500,000 shares of common
stock by us pursuant to this offering, the exercise of
managements options to purchase 265,530 shares of our
common stock and the application of the net proceeds therefrom
as described in Use of Proceeds. You should read
this table in conjunction with the Use of Proceeds,
Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial Data,
Selected Financial Data, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and our consolidated financial statements and
related notes to those statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma for the | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
Actual | |
|
MWC Acquisition | |
|
As Adjusted | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
1,527 |
|
|
$ |
1,527 |
|
|
$ |
1,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (including current maturities):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior credit facility:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility
|
|
$ |
5,851 |
|
|
$ |
60,851 |
|
|
$ |
36,730 |
|
|
|
Term loans
|
|
|
141,132 |
|
|
|
141,132 |
|
|
|
141,132 |
|
|
Other debt(2)
|
|
|
6,502 |
|
|
|
6,502 |
|
|
|
6,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
153,485 |
|
|
|
208,485 |
|
|
|
184,364 |
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value per share;
5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and
outstanding on an actual or pro forma basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value per share;
30,000,000 shares authorized; 17,987,497 issued and
outstanding on an actual basis, and 19,753,027 shares
issued and outstanding on a pro forma basis
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
123,660 |
|
|
|
123,660 |
|
|
|
147,779 |
|
|
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)
|
|
|
(4,568 |
) |
|
|
(4,568 |
) |
|
|
(4,568 |
) |
|
Stock subscriptions receivable
|
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
1,273 |
|
|
|
1,273 |
|
|
|
1,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
120,370 |
|
|
|
120,370 |
|
|
|
144,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$ |
273,855 |
|
|
$ |
328,855 |
|
|
$ |
328,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
On February 7, 2005, we amended our senior credit facility
to increase our revolving credit facility from
$40.0 million to $75.0 million and our term loans from
$65.0 million to $145.0 million. We used borrowings of
approximately $106.4 million under our amended senior
credit facility to fund substantially all of the purchase price
of the Mayflower acquisition. On June 3, 2005, we further
amended our senior credit facility to increase our revolving
credit facility from $75.0 million to $100.0 million.
We used revolving credit borrowings of approximately
$58.0 million under our senior credit facility to fund
substantially all of the purchase price and related expenses of
the MWC acquisition. |
|
|
(2) |
Other debt includes borrowings of $6.5 million financed
through the issuance of industrial development bonds relating to
our Vonore, Tennessee facility. These bonds were redeemed on
May 2, 2005 for approximately $6.5 million. |
24
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following unaudited pro forma consolidated financial
statements have been derived by the application of pro forma
adjustments to our historical consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus. We are providing the
following unaudited pro forma financial information because the
effects of the Mayflower acquisition, the MWC acquisition and
this offering on our financial information are material.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated statement of operations
data for the year ended December 31, 2004 and the three
months ended March 31, 2004 and 2005 have been prepared to
give effect to:
|
|
|
|
|
the Mayflower acquisition; |
|
|
|
the MWC acquisition; |
|
|
|
the sale of 1,500,000 shares of common stock by us pursuant
to this offering and the application of the net proceeds
therefrom as described in Use of Proceeds; and |
|
|
|
the exercise of managements options to purchase
265,530 shares of our common stock and the application of
the proceeds therefrom as described in Use of
Proceeds, |
as if each of these transactions had occurred on January 1,
2004.
The unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet data as of
March 31, 2005 have been prepared to give effect to the MWC
acquisition, the sale of 1,500,000 shares of common stock
by us pursuant to this offering, the exercise of
managements options to purchase 265,530 shares of our
common stock and the application of the net proceeds therefrom
as described in Use of Proceeds, as if each of these
transactions had occurred on March 31, 2005.
The adjustments to the unaudited pro forma financial data are
based upon valuations and other studies that have not been
completed but that management believes to be reasonable. The
unaudited pro forma financial data are for informational
purposes only and do not purport to represent or be indicative
of actual results that would have been achieved had the
transactions described above actually been completed on the
dates indicated and do not purport to be indicative or to
forecast what our balance sheet data, results of operations,
cash flows or other data will be as of any future date or for
any future period. A number of factors may affect our results.
See Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements and Risk Factors.
The pro forma adjustments are based on preliminary estimates and
currently available information and assumptions that management
believes are reasonable. The final allocation of shares of
common stock to be offered by us and the selling stockholders in
this offering may affect the pro forma adjustments. The notes to
the unaudited pro forma balance sheet data and statement of
operations data provide a detailed discussion of how such
adjustments were derived and presented herein. The following
data should be read in conjunction with Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, Selected Historical Financial Data
and the consolidated financial statements and related notes
thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus.
25
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
March 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MWC | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition | |
|
Offering | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
Historical | |
|
MWC | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
ASSETS |
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
1,527 |
|
|
$ |
5,128 |
|
|
$ |
(5,128 |
)(1) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,527 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
102,913 |
|
|
|
10,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,344 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
52,129 |
|
|
|
7,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,980 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
7,027 |
|
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
(45 |
)(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,580 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
7,038 |
|
|
|
972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
170,634 |
|
|
|
24,980 |
|
|
|
(5,173 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
190,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and buildings
|
|
|
39,930 |
|
|
|
10,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,808 |
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
121,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,790 |
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
6,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,073 |
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(99,434 |
) |
|
|
(5,491 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(104,925 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment net
|
|
|
68,359 |
|
|
|
5,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GOODWILL
|
|
|
145,100 |
|
|
|
3,250 |
|
|
|
39,295 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,645 |
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
6,516 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,173 |
|
OTHER ASSETS, net
|
|
|
7,301 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
397,910 |
|
|
$ |
34,571 |
|
|
$ |
34,122 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
466,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT |
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
$ |
16,251 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16,251 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
67,679 |
|
|
|
6,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,080 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
38,719 |
|
|
|
4,337 |
|
|
|
2,955 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
122,649 |
|
|
|
10,738 |
|
|
|
2,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM DEBT, net of current maturities
|
|
|
137,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,000 |
(3) |
|
|
(24,121 |
)(5) |
|
|
168,113 |
|
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
|
|
|
17,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
277,540 |
|
|
|
10,738 |
|
|
|
57,955 |
|
|
|
(24,121 |
) |
|
|
322,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
(5) |
|
|
182 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
123,660 |
|
|
|
33,300 |
|
|
|
(33,300 |
)(4) |
|
|
24,119 |
(5) |
|
|
147,779 |
|
|
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)
|
|
|
(4,568 |
) |
|
|
(9,457 |
) |
|
|
9,457 |
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,568 |
) |
|
Stock subscription receivable
|
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
1,273 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
10 |
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders investment
|
|
|
120,370 |
|
|
|
23,833 |
|
|
|
(23,833 |
) |
|
|
24,121 |
|
|
|
144,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
397,910 |
|
|
$ |
34,571 |
|
|
$ |
34,122 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
466,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial
Statements
26
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions | |
|
Offering | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
CVG | |
|
Mayflower | |
|
MWC | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Consolidated(9) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | |
REVENUES
|
|
$ |
380,445 |
|
|
$ |
206,457 |
|
|
$ |
84,056 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
670,958 |
|
COST OF SALES
|
|
|
309,696 |
|
|
|
181,209 |
|
|
|
71,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
562,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
70,749 |
|
|
|
25,248 |
|
|
|
12,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,235 |
|
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
|
|
|
28,985 |
|
|
|
3,659 |
|
|
|
4,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,314 |
|
NONCASH OPTION CHARGE
|
|
|
10,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,125 |
|
AMORTIZATION EXPENSE
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
31,532 |
|
|
|
21,589 |
|
|
|
7,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,659 |
|
OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE
|
|
|
(1,247 |
) |
|
|
765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(482 |
) |
INTEREST EXPENSE (INCOME)
|
|
|
7,244 |
|
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
11,096 |
(6) |
|
|
(1,688 |
)(8) |
|
|
16,617 |
|
LOSS ON EARLY EXTINGUISHMENT OF DEBT
|
|
|
1,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
23,930 |
|
|
|
20,994 |
|
|
|
7,403 |
|
|
|
(11,096 |
) |
|
|
1,688 |
|
|
|
42,919 |
|
PROVISION (BENEFIT) FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
6,481 |
|
|
|
7,865 |
|
|
|
2,961 |
|
|
|
(3,906 |
)(7) |
|
|
675 |
(7) |
|
|
14,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
$ |
17,449 |
|
|
$ |
13,129 |
|
|
$ |
4,442 |
|
|
$ |
(7,190 |
) |
|
$ |
1,013 |
|
|
$ |
28,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
|
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
|
|
$ |
1.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial
Statements
27
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions | |
|
Offering | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
CVG | |
|
Mayflower | |
|
MWC | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Consolidated(9) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | |
REVENUES
|
|
$ |
152,415 |
|
|
$ |
23,986 |
|
|
$ |
23,946 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
200,347 |
|
COST OF SALES
|
|
|
126,163 |
|
|
|
21,553 |
|
|
|
19,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
26,252 |
|
|
|
2,433 |
|
|
|
4,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,505 |
|
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
|
|
|
9,549 |
|
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,444 |
|
AMORTIZATION EXPENSE
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
16,679 |
|
|
|
1,706 |
|
|
|
3,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,034 |
|
OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE
|
|
|
(2,881 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,881 |
) |
INTEREST EXPENSE (INCOME)
|
|
|
2,168 |
|
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
(2,230 |
) |
|
|
3,193 |
(6) |
|
|
(422 |
)(8) |
|
|
3,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
17,392 |
|
|
|
913 |
|
|
|
5,879 |
|
|
|
(3,193 |
) |
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
21,413 |
|
PROVISION (BENEFIT) FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
6,506 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
1,929 |
|
|
|
(855 |
)(7) |
|
|
169 |
(7) |
|
|
8,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
$ |
10,886 |
|
|
$ |
517 |
|
|
$ |
3,950 |
|
|
$ |
(2,338 |
) |
|
$ |
253 |
|
|
$ |
13,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial
Statements
28
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended March 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions | |
|
Offering | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
CVG | |
|
Mayflower | |
|
MWC | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Consolidated(9) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | |
REVENUES
|
|
$ |
85,990 |
|
|
$ |
42,768 |
|
|
$ |
21,185 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
149,943 |
|
COST OF SALES
|
|
|
70,503 |
|
|
|
37,850 |
|
|
|
19,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
15,487 |
|
|
|
4,918 |
|
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,683 |
|
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
|
|
|
7,497 |
|
|
|
1,019 |
|
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,510 |
|
NONCASH OPTION CHARGE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMORTIZATION EXPENSE
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
7,954 |
|
|
|
3,899 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,117 |
|
OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE
|
|
|
(3,270 |
) |
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,499 |
) |
INTEREST EXPENSE (INCOME)
|
|
|
2,268 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
2,658 |
(6) |
|
|
(422 |
) (8) |
|
|
4,611 |
|
LOSS ON EARLY EXTINGUISHMENT OF DEBT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
8,956 |
|
|
|
4,165 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
(2,658 |
) |
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
11,005 |
|
PROVISION (BENEFIT) FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
3,407 |
|
|
|
1,615 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
(1,012 |
) (7) |
|
|
169 |
(7) |
|
|
4,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
$ |
5,549 |
|
|
$ |
2,550 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
(1,646 |
) |
|
$ |
253 |
|
|
$ |
6,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Consolidated Financial
Statements
29
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
(1) |
The MWC acquisition will be accounted for by the purchase method
of accounting. Under purchase accounting, the total purchase
price will be allocated to the tangible and intangible assets
and liabilities of MWC based upon their respective fair values.
This allocation will be based upon valuations and other studies
that have not yet been completed. A preliminary allocation of
the purchase price has been made to major categories of assets
and liabilities based on available information. The actual
allocation of purchase price and the resulting effect on income
from operations may differ significantly from the pro forma
amounts included herein. |
|
|
The purchase price and costs associated with the MWC acquisition
exceeded the preliminary fair value of the net assets acquired
by approximately $39.3 million. Pending completion of an
independent valuation analysis, we have preliminarily allocated
the excess purchase price over the fair value of the net assets
acquired to goodwill. The acquired goodwill is not deductible
for income tax purposes. Our preliminary estimate of goodwill as
of the acquisition date, which is subject to further refinement,
is as follows (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
price (cash consideration)
|
|
$ |
55,000 |
|
Transaction
costs
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
Net
assets of MWC at historical cost
|
|
|
(18,705 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Excess
of purchase price over net assets acquired
|
|
$ |
39,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Reflects accrued transaction costs which were not paid at
closing. |
|
(3) |
Reflects the net borrowings under our revolving credit facility
to fund the MWC acquisition. |
|
(4) |
Represents the elimination of the MWC equity accounts as of
March 31, 2005. |
|
(5) |
Reflects the receipt of net proceeds from the offering and
proceeds from the exercise of managements stock options
and the use of these proceeds to repay a portion of our
revolving credit facility (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from sale of common stock in offering
|
|
$ |
27,000 |
|
Proceeds
from exercise of management stock options
|
|
|
1,471 |
|
Less:
underwriting fee and expenses
|
|
|
(1,350 |
) |
Less:
other expenses of issuance and distribution
|
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net
proceeds available for repayment
|
|
$ |
24,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6) |
Reflects adjustments to interest expense on incremental net
borrowings of approximately $106.4 million incurred in
connection with the Mayflower acquisition and interest expense
on incremental net borrowings of approximately
$58.0 million incurred in connection with the MWC
acquisition at a weighted average interest rate of 6.5% for
borrowings under the term loan facility and 7.0% for borrowings
under the revolving credit facility as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to Interest Expense | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Interest on incremental $106.4 million of net borrowings
related to the Mayflower acquisition
|
|
$ |
7,211 |
|
|
$ |
793 |
|
|
$ |
1,802 |
|
Interest on incremental $58.0 million of net borrowings
related to the MWC acquisition
|
|
|
3,850 |
|
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
11,061 |
|
|
|
1,756 |
|
|
|
2,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment for interest income (expense) previously recorded by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mayflower
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
(793 |
) |
|
|
37 |
|
|
MWC
|
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
2,230 |
|
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase
|
|
$ |
11,096 |
|
|
$ |
3,193 |
|
|
$ |
2,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
(7) |
Reflects an adjustment to income taxes based on our effective
tax rate. |
|
|
(8) |
Reflects the reduction of interest expense on the reduction in
net borrowings under our revolving credit facility at a weighted
average interest rate of 7.0%. |
|
|
(9) |
In the event that we complete our concurrent senior notes
offering, after giving further effect to such offering,
(a) our pro forma interest expense for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2004 would have been
$20.5 million, $4.5 million and $5.6 million,
respectively, (b) our pro forma net income for the year
ended December 31, 2004 and for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2004 would have been
$26.5 million, $12.7 million and $6.2 million,
respectively, (c) our pro forma income tax expense for the
year ended December 31, 2004 and for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2004 would have been
$12.5 million, $7.8 million and $3.8 million,
respectively, and (d) our pro forma total indebtedness as
of March 31, 2005 would have been $189.6 million.
However, the completion of this common stock offering is not
connected with or contingent upon the completion of the senior
notes offering and there is no guarantee that the senior notes
offering will, in fact, be completed. |
|
31
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial
data regarding our business and certain industry information and
should be read together with Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and our consolidated financial statements and
the related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.
The selected consolidated financial data as of December 31,
2003 and 2004 and for the years ended December 31, 2002,
2003 and 2004, are derived from our consolidated financial
statements that are included elsewhere in this prospectus, which
financial statements have been audited by Deloitte &
Touche LLP as indicated by their report thereon. The
consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2002 and
the consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the
year ended December 31, 2001 are derived from our audited
consolidated financial statements, which are not included in
this prospectus. The consolidated balance sheet data as of
December 31, 2000 and 2001 and as of March 31, 2005
and the consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for
the year ended December 31, 2000 and the three months ended
March 31, 2004 and 2005 are derived from our unaudited
consolidated financial statements. Our unaudited financial
statements as of March 31, 2005 and for the three months
ended March 31, 2004 and 2005 are included elsewhere in
this prospectus and include certain adjustments, all of which
are normal recurring adjustments, which our management considers
necessary for a fair presentation of our results for these
unaudited periods. The results of operations for the three
months ended March 31, 2005 are not necessarily indicative
of the results of operations for a full fiscal year. The North
American Class 8 heavy-duty truck production rates included
in the Other Data section set forth below are
unaudited.
The unaudited financial data set forth below as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2000 is derived from the results of
operations of Trim Systems, LLC for the entire period and the
results of operations of Commercial Vehicle Systems and
National/KAB Seating beginning from their respective dates of
acquisition by our principal stockholders, which occurred on
March 31, 2000 and October 6, 2000, respectively.
Because these businesses were under common control since their
respective dates of acquisition, their historical results of
operations have been combined for the periods in which they were
under common control based on their respective historical basis
of accounting.
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) | |
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
244,963 |
|
|
$ |
271,226 |
|
|
$ |
298,678 |
|
|
$ |
287,579 |
|
|
$ |
380,445 |
|
|
$ |
85,990 |
|
|
$ |
152,415 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
208,083 |
|
|
|
229,593 |
|
|
|
249,181 |
|
|
|
237,884 |
|
|
|
309,696 |
|
|
|
70,503 |
|
|
|
126,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
36,880 |
|
|
|
41,633 |
|
|
|
49,497 |
|
|
|
49,695 |
|
|
|
70,749 |
|
|
|
15,487 |
|
|
|
26,252 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
21,569 |
|
|
|
21,767 |
|
|
|
23,952 |
|
|
|
24,281 |
|
|
|
28,985 |
|
|
|
7,497 |
|
|
|
9,549 |
|
Noncash option issuance charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
2,725 |
|
|
|
3,822 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
5,561 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
7,025 |
|
|
|
15,595 |
|
|
|
25,423 |
|
|
|
25,229 |
|
|
|
31,532 |
|
|
|
7,954 |
|
|
|
16,679 |
|
Other expense (income)
|
|
|
(1,955 |
) |
|
|
(2,347 |
) |
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
3,230 |
|
|
|
(1,247 |
) |
|
|
(3,270 |
) |
|
|
(2,881 |
) |
Interest expense
|
|
|
12,396 |
|
|
|
14,885 |
|
|
|
12,940 |
|
|
|
9,796 |
|
|
|
7,244 |
|
|
|
2,268 |
|
|
|
2,168 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,972 |
|
|
|
1,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
|
(3,416 |
) |
|
|
3,057 |
|
|
|
11,385 |
|
|
|
9,231 |
|
|
|
23,930 |
|
|
|
8,956 |
|
|
|
17,392 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
(2,550 |
) |
|
|
5,072 |
|
|
|
5,235 |
|
|
|
5,267 |
|
|
|
6,481 |
|
|
|
3,407 |
|
|
|
6,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
(866 |
) |
|
|
(2,015 |
) |
|
|
6,150 |
|
|
|
3,964 |
|
|
|
17,449 |
|
|
|
5,549 |
|
|
|
10,886 |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,630 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(866 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,015 |
) |
|
$ |
(45,480 |
) |
|
$ |
3,964 |
|
|
$ |
17,449 |
|
|
$ |
5,549 |
|
|
$ |
10,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.29 |
) |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
(0.15 |
) |
|
|
(3.26 |
) |
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
1.12 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
0.59 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
9,337 |
|
|
|
13,893 |
|
|
|
13,827 |
|
|
|
13,779 |
|
|
|
15,429 |
|
|
|
13,779 |
|
|
|
17,987 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
9,337 |
|
|
|
13,893 |
|
|
|
13,931 |
|
|
|
13,883 |
|
|
|
15,623 |
|
|
|
13,885 |
|
|
|
18,297 |
|
Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$ |
16,768 |
|
|
$ |
10,908 |
|
|
$ |
8,809 |
|
|
$ |
28,216 |
|
|
$ |
41,727 |
|
|
$ |
26,449 |
|
|
$ |
47,985 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
312,006 |
|
|
|
263,754 |
|
|
|
204,217 |
|
|
|
210,495 |
|
|
|
225,638 |
|
|
|
218,511 |
|
|
|
397,910 |
|
Total debt
|
|
|
161,061 |
|
|
|
140,191 |
|
|
|
127,202 |
|
|
|
127,474 |
|
|
|
53,925 |
|
|
|
109,555 |
|
|
|
153,485 |
|
Total stockholders investment
|
|
|
76,287 |
|
|
|
72,913 |
|
|
|
27,025 |
|
|
|
34,806 |
|
|
|
111,046 |
|
|
|
40,627 |
|
|
|
120,370 |
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(2)
|
|
$ |
16,107 |
|
|
$ |
28,428 |
|
|
$ |
34,105 |
|
|
$ |
33,335 |
|
|
$ |
39,099 |
|
|
$ |
10,014 |
|
|
$ |
19,441 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
24,068 |
|
|
|
12,408 |
|
|
|
18,172 |
|
|
|
10,442 |
|
|
|
34,177 |
|
|
|
6,035 |
|
|
|
10,058 |
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(3,051 |
) |
|
|
7,749 |
|
|
|
(4,937 |
) |
|
|
(5,967 |
) |
|
|
(8,907 |
) |
|
|
(840 |
) |
|
|
(109,241 |
) |
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(13,160 |
) |
|
|
(24,792 |
) |
|
|
(14,825 |
) |
|
|
(2,761 |
) |
|
|
(28,427 |
) |
|
|
(7,667 |
) |
|
|
99,965 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
9,078 |
|
|
|
12,833 |
|
|
|
8,682 |
|
|
|
8,106 |
|
|
|
7,567 |
|
|
|
2,060 |
|
|
|
2,762 |
|
Capital expenditures, net
|
|
|
3,174 |
|
|
|
4,898 |
|
|
|
4,937 |
|
|
|
5,967 |
|
|
|
8,907 |
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
2,883 |
|
North American Class 8 heavy-duty truck production
(units)(3)
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
33
|
|
(1) |
Earnings (loss) per share and weighted average common shares
outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001,
2002, 2003 and 2004 have been calculated giving effect to the
reclassification, in connection with our initial public
offering, of our previously outstanding six classes of common
stock into one class of common stock and, in connection
therewith, a 38.991-to-one stock split. Earnings (loss) per
share for all periods were computed in accordance with Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, Earnings
Per Share (SFAS No. 128). |
|
(2) |
EBITDA represents earnings before interest expense,
income taxes and depreciation and amortization, noncash gain
(loss) on forward exchange contracts, loss on early
extinguishment of debt and an impairment charge associated with
the adoption of SFAS No. 142. EBITDA does not
represent and should not be considered as an alternative to net
income or cash flow from operations, as determined by generally
accepted accounting principles. We present EBITDA because we
believe that it is widely accepted that EBITDA provides useful
information regarding our operating results. We rely on EBITDA
primarily as an operating performance measure in order to review
and assess our company and our management team. For example, our
management incentive plan is based upon the company achieving
minimum EBITDA targets for a given year. We also review EBITDA
to compare our current operating results with corresponding
periods and with other companies in our industry. We believe
that it is useful to investors to provide disclosures of our
operating results on the same basis as that used by our
management. We also believe that it can assist investors in
comparing our performance to that of other companies on a
consistent basis without regard to depreciation, amortization,
interest or taxes, which do not directly affect our operating
performance. EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and
you should not consider it in isolation, or as a substitute for
analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these
limitations are: |
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA does not reflect our cash expenditures, or future
requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments; |
|
|
|
EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for,
our working capital needs; |
|
|
|
EBITDA does not reflect the significant interest expense, or the
cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal
payments, on our debts; |
|
|
|
Although depreciation and amortization are noncash charges, the
assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be
replaced in the future, and EBITDA does not reflect any cash
requirements for such replacements; and |
|
|
|
Other companies in our industry may calculate EBITDA differently
than we do, limiting their usefulness as a comparative measure. |
34
|
|
|
Because of these limitations, EBITDA should not be considered a
measure of discretionary cash available to us to invest in the
growth of our business. We compensate for these limitations by
relying primarily on our GAAP results and using EBITDA only
supplementally. See the consolidated statements of cash flows
included in our financial statements included elsewhere herein.
The following is a reconciliation of EBITDA to net income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
16,107 |
|
|
$ |
28,428 |
|
|
$ |
34,105 |
|
|
$ |
33,335 |
|
|
$ |
39,099 |
|
|
$ |
10,014 |
|
|
$ |
19,441 |
|
Add (subtract):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(9,078 |
) |
|
|
(12,833 |
) |
|
|
(8,682 |
) |
|
|
(8,106 |
) |
|
|
(7,567 |
) |
|
|
(2,060 |
) |
|
|
(2,762 |
) |
|
Noncash gain (loss) on forward exchange contracts
|
|
|
1,951 |
|
|
|
2,347 |
|
|
|
(1,098 |
) |
|
|
(3,230 |
) |
|
|
1,247 |
|
|
|
3,270 |
|
|
|
2,881 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(12,396 |
) |
|
|
(14,885 |
) |
|
|
(12,940 |
) |
|
|
(9,796 |
) |
|
|
(7,244 |
) |
|
|
(2,268 |
) |
|
|
(2,168 |
) |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,972 |
) |
|
|
(1,605 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Provision) benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
2,550 |
|
|
|
(5,072 |
) |
|
|
(5,235 |
) |
|
|
(5,267 |
) |
|
|
(6,481 |
) |
|
|
(3,407 |
) |
|
|
(6,506 |
) |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,630 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(866 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,015 |
) |
|
$ |
(45,480 |
) |
|
$ |
3,964 |
|
|
$ |
17,449 |
|
|
$ |
5,549 |
|
|
$ |
10,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
Source: Americas Commercial Transportation Research Co. LLC and
ACT Publications. |
35
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion and analysis in
conjunction with the information set forth under Selected
Historical Financial Data and our consolidated financial
statements and the notes to those statements included elsewhere
in this prospectus. The statements in this discussion regarding
industry outlook, our expectations regarding our future
performance, liquidity and capital resources and other
non-historical statements in this discussion are forward-looking
statements. See Cautionary Notice Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements. These forward-looking
statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties,
including, but not limited to, the risks and uncertainties
described under Risk Factors. Our actual results may
differ materially from those contained in or implied by any
forward-looking statements.
Company Overview
We are a leading supplier of fully integrated system solutions
for the global commercial vehicle market, including the
heavy-duty truck market, the construction and agriculture market
and the specialty and military transportation markets. As a
result of our strong leadership in cab-related products and
systems, we are positioned to benefit from the increased focus
of our customers on cab design and comfort and convenience
features to better serve their end user, the driver. Our
products include suspension seat systems, interior trim systems
(including instrument panels, door panels, headliners, cabinetry
and floor systems), cab structures and components, mirrors,
wiper systems, electronic wire harness assemblies and controls
and switches specifically designed for applications in
commercial vehicles.
We are differentiated from suppliers to the automotive industry
by our ability to manufacture low volume customized products on
a sequenced basis to meet the requirements of our customers. We
believe that we have the number one or two position in most of
our major markets and that we are the only supplier in the North
American commercial vehicle market that can offer complete cab
systems including cab body assemblies, sleeper boxes, seats,
interior trim, flooring, wire harnesses, panel assemblies and
other structural components. We believe our products are used by
virtually every major North American commercial vehicle OEM,
which we believe creates an opportunity to cross-sell our
products and offer a fully integrated system solution.
Demand for our products is generally dependent on the number of
new commercial vehicles manufactured, which in turn is a
function of general economic conditions, interest rates, changes
in governmental regulations, consumer spending, fuel costs and
our customers inventory levels and production rates. New
commercial vehicle demand has historically been cyclical and is
particularly sensitive to the industrial sector of the economy,
which generates a significant portion of the freight tonnage
hauled by commercial vehicles. Production of commercial vehicles
in North America peaked in 1999 and experienced a downturn from
2000 to 2003 that was due to a weak economy, an over supply of
new and used vehicle inventory and lower spending on commercial
vehicles and equipment. Demand for commercial vehicles improved
in 2004 due to a variety of factors, including broad economic
recovery in North America, the need to replace aging truck
fleets as a result of under-investment, increasing freight
volumes and increasing hauler profits.
In 2004, on an actual and pro forma basis, over 54% and over
59%, respectively, of our revenue was generated from sales to
North American heavy-duty truck OEMs. Our remaining revenue in
2004 was derived from sales to OEMs in the global construction
market and other specialized transportation markets and, on a
pro forma basis, sale of body structures for Ford GT
automobiles. Demand for our products is also driven to a
significant degree by preferences of the end-user of the
commercial vehicle, particularly with respect to heavy-duty
trucks. Unlike the automotive industry, commercial vehicle OEMs
generally afford the ultimate end-user the ability to specify
many of the component parts that will be used to manufacture the
commercial vehicle, including a wide variety of cab interior
styles and colors, the brand and type of seats, type of seat
fabric and color and specific mirror styling. In addition,
certain of our products are only utilized in heavy-duty trucks,
such as our storage systems, sleeper boxes, sleeper bunks and
privacy curtains, and, as a result, changes in demand for
heavy-duty trucks or the mix of options on a
36
vehicle generally has a greater impact on our business than do
changes in the overall demand for commercial vehicles. For
example, a heavy-duty truck with a sleeper cab can contain three
times as many interior features as a heavy-duty truck with a day
cab which increases our content per vehicle. To the extent that
demand increases for higher content vehicles, our revenues and
gross profit will be positively impacted.
Along with North America, we have operations in Europe,
Australia, Mexico and China. On an actual and pro forma basis,
approximately 28% and 24%, respectively, of our revenues in 2004
have been derived from these operations. Our operating results
are therefore impacted by exchange rate fluctuations to the
extent we are unable to match revenues received in such
currencies with costs incurred in such currencies. Strengthening
of these foreign currencies as compared to the U.S. dollar,
on an actual and pro forma basis, resulted in an approximately
$11 million increase in our revenues in 2004 as compared to
2003. Because our costs were generally impacted to the same
degree as our revenue, this exchange rate fluctuation did not
have a material impact on our net income in 2004 as compared to
2003.
In response to the last downturn in the commercial vehicle
market from 2000 to 2003, we implemented a number of operating
initiatives to improve our overall cost structure and operating
efficiencies. These included:
|
|
|
|
|
eliminating excess production capacity through the closure and
consolidation of four manufacturing facilities, two design
centers and two assembly facilities; |
|
|
|
implementing Lean Manufacturing and Total Quality Production
System (TQPS) initiatives throughout many of
our U.S. manufacturing facilities to improve operating
efficiency and product quality; |
|
|
|
reducing headcount for both salaried and hourly employees; and |
|
|
|
improving our design capabilities and new product development
efforts to focus on higher margin product enhancements. |
As a result of these initiatives, we improved our operating
margins each year since 2000 despite a reduction in North
American heavy-duty (Class 8) truck production of 28% from
252,000 units in 2000 to 182,000 units in 2003. We
continuously seek ways to lower costs, improve manufacturing
efficiencies and increase product throughput and intend to apply
this philosophy to those operations recently acquired through
the Mayflower and MWC acquisitions. We believe our ongoing cost
saving initiatives and the establishment of our sourcing
relationships in China will enable us to continue to lower
manufacturing costs. In conjunction with the start-up of our
Shanghai, China facility, we have established a relationship
with Baird Asia Limited to assist us in sourcing products for
use in our China facility as well as sourcing products for our
operations in the United States at prices lower than we can
purchase components today.
Although OEM demand for our products is directly correlated with
new vehicle production, we also have the opportunity to grow
through increasing our product content per vehicle through
cross-selling and bundling of products. We generally compete for
new business at the beginning of the development of a new
vehicle platform and upon the redesign of existing programs. New
platform development generally begins at least one to three
years before the marketing of such models by our customers.
Contract durations for commercial vehicle products generally
extend for the entire life of the platform, which is typically
five to seven years.
In sourcing products for a specific platform, the customer
generally develops a proposed production timetable, including
current volume and option mix estimates based on their own
assumptions, and then sources business with the supplier
pursuant to written contracts, purchase orders or other firm
commitments in terms of price, quality, technology and delivery.
In general, these contracts, purchase orders and commitments
provide that the customer can terminate if a supplier does not
meet specified quality and delivery requirements and, in many
cases, they provide that the price will decrease over the
proposed production timetable. Awarded business generally covers
the supply of all or a portion of a customers production
and service requirements for a particular product program rather
than the supply of
37
a specific quantity of products. Accordingly, in estimating
awarded business over the life of a contract or other
commitment, a supplier must make various assumptions as to the
estimated number of vehicles expected to be produced, the timing
of that production, mix of options on the vehicles produced and
pricing of the products being supplied. The actual production
volumes and option mix of vehicles produced by customers depend
on a number of factors that are beyond a suppliers control.
Recent Acquisitions
On February 7, 2005, we acquired substantially all of the
assets and liabilities related to Mayflower Vehicle
Systems North American Commercial Vehicle Operations for
$107.5 million, and Mayflower became a wholly owned
subsidiary of CVG. The Mayflower acquisition was funded through
an increase and amendment to our senior credit facility.
Mayflower is the only non-captive producer of complete steel and
aluminum truck cabs for the commercial vehicle sector in North
America. Mayflower serves the North American commercial vehicle
sector from three manufacturing locations, Norwalk, Ohio,
Shadyside, Ohio and Kings Mountain, North Carolina, supplying
three major product lines: cab frames and assemblies, sleeper
boxes and other structural components. Through the Mayflower
acquisition we believe we are the only supplier worldwide to
offer complete cab systems in sequence, integrating interior
trim and seats with the cab structure. The acquisition gives us
the leading position in North American cab structures and the
number two position in complete cab assemblies, as well as full
service cab and sleeper engineering and development capabilities
with a technical facility located near Detroit, Michigan.
Moreover, the Mayflower acquisition broadens our revenue base at
International, Volvo/ Mack, Freightliner, PACCAR and Caterpillar
and enhances our cross-selling opportunities. We anticipate that
in addition to new opportunities, the Mayflower acquisition will
provide significant cost saving opportunities. As we have
complementary customers with Mayflower, this will also balance
revenue distribution and strengthen customer relationships. For
the year ended December 31, 2004, Mayflower recorded
revenues of $206.5 million and operating income of
$21.6 million. We estimate that the future tax benefits
related to the deductibility of goodwill and intangible asset
amortization to have an estimated present value of
$12 million.
On June 3, 2005, we acquired all of the stock of Monona
Corporation, the parent of MWC, for $55.0 million, and MWC
became a wholly owned subsidiary of CVG. The MWC acquisition was
funded through an increase and amendment to our senior credit
facility. MWC is a leading manufacturer of complex, electronic
wire harnesses and related assemblies used in the global heavy
equipment, commercial vehicle, heavy-truck and specialty and
military vehicle markets. It also produces panel assemblies for
commercial equipment markets and cab frame assemblies for
Caterpillar. MWCs wire harness assemblies are critical,
complex products that are the primary electrical current
carrying devices within vehicle systems. MWC offers
approximately 4,500 different wire harness assemblies for
its customers, which include leading OEMs such as Caterpillar,
Deere & Co. and Oshkosh Truck. MWC operates from
primary manufacturing operations in the U.S. and Mexico and we
believe it is cost competitive on a global basis. The
MWC acquisition will enhance our ability to offer
comprehensive cab systems to our customers, expands our
electronic assembly capabilities, adds Mexico manufacturing
capabilities and offers significant cross-selling opportunities
over a more diversified base of customers. For the fiscal year
ended January 31, 2005, MWC recorded revenues of
$85.5 million and operating income of $9.6 million.
Basis of Presentation
Onex, Hidden Creek and certain other investors acquired Trim
Systems in 1997 and each of Commercial Vehicle Systems, or CVS,
and National/ KAB Seating in 2000. Each of these companies was
initially owned through separate holding companies. The
operations of CVS and National/ KAB Seating were formally
combined under a single holding company, now known as Commercial
Vehicle Group, Inc., on March 28, 2003. In connection with
our initial public offering, Trim Systems became a wholly owned
subsidiary of CVG on August 2, 2004. Because these
businesses were under common control since their respective
dates of acquisition, their respective historical results of
operations have been combined for the periods in which they were
under common control based on their respective historical basis
of accounting.
38
Results of Operations
The table below sets forth certain operating data expressed as a
percentage of revenues for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales
|
|
|
83.4 |
|
|
|
82.7 |
|
|
|
81.4 |
|
|
|
82.0 |
|
|
|
82.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
17.3 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
Noncash option charge
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
Other (income) expense
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
Interest expense
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of change in
accounting
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
|
|
|
17.3 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(15.2 |
)% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 Compared to Three
Months Ended March 31, 2004
Revenues. Revenues increased $66.4 million, or
77.2%, to $152.4 million in the three months ended
March 31, 2005 from $86.0 million in the three months
ended March 31, 2004. This increase resulted primarily from
the acquisition of Mayflower which equated to approximately
$40 million of increased revenue. In addition, a 48%
increase in North American heavy truck production equated to
approximately $23.1 million of increased revenues while
higher OEM sales in the European and Asian seating markets
increased revenues approximately $2.4 million. Favorable
foreign exchange fluctuations also added approximately
$0.9 million of revenues over the prior year period.
Gross Profit. Gross profit increased $10.8 million,
or 69.5%, to $26.3 million in the three months ended
March 31, 2005 from $15.5 million in the three months
ended March 31, 2004. As a percentage of revenues, gross
profit decreased to 17.2% in the three months ended
March 31, 2005 from 18.0% in the three months ended
March 31, 2004. This decrease resulted primarily from the
continuing pressures on raw material commodities such as steel
and petroleum which had a negative impact of approximately
$3 million during the quarter.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling,
general and administrative expenses increased $2.1 million,
or 27.4%, to $9.6 million in the three months ended
March 31, 2005 from $7.5 million in the three months
ended March 31, 2004. This increase resulted principally
from the Mayflower acquisition as well as additional costs
related to the overall growth and costs related to being a
public company versus the prior year period.
39
Amortization Expense. Amortization expense decreased
$12,000, or 33.3%, to $24,000 in the three months ended
March 31, 2005 from $36,000 in the three months ended
March 31, 2004.
Other (Income) Expense. We use forward exchange contracts
to hedge foreign currency transaction exposures of our United
Kingdom operations. We estimate our projected revenues and
purchases in certain foreign currencies or locations and will
hedge a portion of the anticipated long or short position. We
have not historically designated any of our forward exchange
contracts as cash flow hedges, electing instead to
mark-to-market the contracts and record the fair value of the
contracts in our balance sheets, with the offsetting noncash
gain or loss recorded in our consolidated statements of
operations. The $2.9 million gain in the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and the $3.3 million gain in the three
months ended March 31, 2004 primarily represent the noncash
change in value of the forward exchange contracts in existence
at the end of each respective period.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased
$0.1 million, or 4.5%, to $2.2 million in the three
months ended March 31, 2005 from $2.3 million in the
three months ended March 31, 2004. This decrease reflects a
reduction in total debt during the respective periods offset by
the addition of debt related to the Mayflower acquisition.
Provision for Income Taxes. Our effective tax rate was
37.4% for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 38.0%
for the same period in 2004. An income tax provision of
$6.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2005
compared to a provision for income tax of $3.4 million in
the three months ended March 31, 2004. The minor reduction
in effective rate quarter over quarter can be attributed to our
tax position in certain geographical regions and changes in
federal and state rates from the prior year period.
Net Income. Net income increased $5.3 million to
$10.9 million in the three months ended March 31,
2005, compared to $5.6 million in the three months ended
March 31, 2004, primarily as a result of the factors
discussed above.
Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2003
Revenues. Revenues increased $92.9 million, or
32.3%, to $380.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 from $287.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 2003. We believe this increase resulted
primarily from:
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in North American heavy-duty truck production as
well as an increase in production levels for other North
American end markets, which resulted in approximately
$67 million of increased revenues; |
|
|
|
new business awards related to seats, mirrors and interior trim,
which resulted in approximately $13 million of increased
revenues; and |
|
|
|
favorable foreign exchange fluctuations of approximately
$11 million. |
Gross Profit. Gross profit increased $21.1 million,
or 42.4%, to $70.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 from $49.7 million for the year
ended December 31, 2003. As a percentage of revenues, gross
profit increased to 18.6% for the year ended December 31,
2004 from 17.3% for the year ended December 31, 2003. We
believe this increase resulted primarily from the revenue
increases discussed above and our ability to convert on the
revenue increases at an overall incremental margin of 25%
without having to incur additional fixed costs to support the
increased revenues. In addition, we continued to seek material
cost reductions, reductions in packaging costs and labor
efficiencies to generate additional profits during the year
ended December 31, 2004.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling,
general and administrative expenses increased $4.7 million,
or 19.4%, to $29.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 from $24.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2003. We believe this increase resulted
principally from increases in wages and the cost of additional
resources to accommodate product innovation and growth in the
commercial vehicle sector as well as cost associated with being
a public company.
40
Noncash Option Charge. To reward our senior management
team for its success in reducing operating costs, integrating
businesses and improving processes through cyclical periods, we
granted options to purchase an aggregate of 910,869 shares
of our common stock to 16 members of our management team in May
2004. The exercise price for such options is $5.54 per
share. As modified, such options have a ten-year term with 100%
of such options being currently exercisable. We incurred a
noncash compensation charge of $10.1 million in the second
quarter of 2004 as a result of the grant of these options. This
noncash compensation charge equals the difference between $5.54
and the fair market value of our common stock as of the grant
date of these options.
Amortization Expense. Amortization expense decreased
42.2%, to $107,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004
from $185,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003. This
reduction was primarily the result of the decrease in deferred
financing costs from the prior year period.
Other (Income) Expense. We use forward exchange contracts
to hedge foreign currency transaction exposures of our United
Kingdom operations. We estimate our projected revenues and
purchases in certain foreign currencies or locations and will
hedge a portion of the anticipated long or short position. We
have not historically designated any of our forward exchange
contracts as cash flow hedges, electing instead to
mark-to-market the contracts and record the fair value of the
contracts on our balance sheet, with the offsetting noncash gain
or loss recorded in our statement of operations. The
$1.2 million gain for the year ended December 31, 2004
and the $3.2 million loss for the year ended
December 31, 2003 represent the noncash change in value of
the forward exchange contracts in existence at the end of each
period.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased
$2.6 million, or 26.1%, to $7.2 million for the year
ended December 31, 2004 from $9.8 million for the year
ended December 31, 2003. This decrease reflects a reduction
in total debt of $73.5 million.
Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt. As part of our
August 2004 initial public offering, we wrote off capitalized
debt financing costs which approximated $1.6 million. As
part of the combination of CVS and National/ KAB Seating during
March 2003, we wrote-off capitalized debt financing costs as
well as certain costs incurred in connection with a credit
agreement amendment. Total capitalized costs written-off and
amendment costs expensed during the twelve months ended
December 31, 2003 approximated $3.0 million.
Provision for Income Taxes. Our effective tax rate during
the year ended December 31, 2004 was 27.1% compared to
57.1% for 2003. Provision for income taxes increased
$1.2 million to $6.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004, compared to an income tax provision of
$5.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The
decrease in effective rate is due to the reversal of the
existing valuation allowance after consideration of our future
prospects.
Net Income. Net income increased $13.5 million to
$17.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2004,
compared to $4.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003, primarily as a result of the factors
discussed above.
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2002
Revenues. Revenues decreased $11.1 million, or 3.7%,
to $287.6 million in 2003 from $298.7 million in 2002.
Factors impacting the decline in revenues in 2003 included a
decrease in North America heavy duty truck, bus and other
customized transportation markets production volumes, which
resulted in $17.5 million of decreased revenues and a
$9.5 million decrease in certain trim-related products.
These factors were partially offset by strong OEM sales in the
Asian construction seating market of approximately
$9.0 million as a result of rising demand for construction
equipment in Asia to accommodate economic growth in that region
and favorable foreign exchange fluctuations of $7.1 million.
Gross Profit. Gross profit increased $0.2 million,
or 0.4%, to $49.7 million in 2003 from $49.5 million
in 2002. As a percentage of revenues, gross profit increased to
17.3% in 2003 from 16.6% in 2002. We believe the
$0.2 million increase in gross profit resulted primarily
from the continued implementation of
41
our Lean Manufacturing and TQPS initiatives and the
corresponding reduction in scrap and overtime expenses at our
Vonore, TN facility, as offset by the reduction in revenues
described above.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling,
general and administrative expenses increased $0.4 million,
or 1.4%, to $24.3 million in 2003 from $23.9 million
in 2002. This increase resulted from $0.3 million of cost
efficiency improvements, offset by approximately
$0.7 million of unfavorable foreign exchange fluctuations.
Amortization Expense. Amortization expense increased
51.6%, to $185,000 in 2003 from $122,000 in 2002.
Other (Income) Expense. The $3.2 million loss in
2003 and the $1.1 million loss in 2002 represent the
noncash change in value of the forward exchange contracts in
existence at the end of each year.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased
$3.1 million, or 24.3%, to $9.8 million in 2003 from
$12.9 million in 2002. This decrease reflects a reduction
in average total debt of $6.4 million and a decrease in
interest rates.
Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt. As part of the
combination of CVS and National/KAB Seating during March 2003,
we wrote-off capitalized debt financing costs as well as certain
costs incurred in connection with a credit agreement amendment.
Total capitalized costs written-off and amendment costs expensed
approximated $3.0 million.
Provision for Income Taxes. Our effective tax rate was
57.1% in 2003 and 46.0% before the cumulative effect of a change
in accounting principle in 2002. Provision for income taxes
increased $0.1 million, or 0.6%, to $5.3 million in
2003 from $5.2 million in 2002. The increase in the
effective tax rate relates to the mix of income and loss among
our North American and European tax jurisdictions and among our
subsidiaries and their individual tax jurisdictions.
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting. The cumulative
effect of change in accounting for 2002 represented the
write-off of goodwill as a result of our adoption of the
provisions of SFAS No. 142, effective January 1,
2002 (see Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
below).
Net Income. Net income for 2003 increased by
$49.4 million to $4.0 million, from
($45.4) million in 2002, primarily as a result of the
factors discussed above.
|
|
|
Restructuring and Asset Impairment Charges |
In 2000, we recorded a $5.6 million restructuring charge as
part of our cost and efficiency initiatives, closing two
manufacturing facilities, two administrative centers, and
reorganizing our manufacturing and administrative functions.
Approximately $1.7 million of the charge was related to
employee severance and associated benefits for the 225
terminated employees, approximately $2.6 million related to
lease and other contractual commitments associated with the
facilities and approximately $1.3 million of asset
impairments related to the write-down of assets. All employees
were terminated by the end of 2001. Our contractual commitments
continue through 2005.
In 2001, we continued our cost and efficiency initiatives and
closed a third manufacturing facility. Of the total
$0.4 million restructuring charge, approximately
$0.1 million related to employee severance and associated
benefits for 77 employees and approximately $0.3 million
related to lease and other contractual commitments associated
with the facility. All employees were terminated by the end of
2002. The contractual commitments continue through 2009.
42
A summary of restructuring activities is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at | |
|
|
|
Balance at | |
|
|
|
Balance at | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
Payments/ | |
|
December 31, | |
|
Payments/ | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
Utilization | |
|
2003 | |
|
Utilization | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Facility exit and other contractual costs
|
|
$ |
1,177 |
|
|
$ |
(390 |
) |
|
$ |
787 |
|
|
$ |
(509 |
) |
|
$ |
278 |
|
Employee costs
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,275 |
|
|
$ |
(488 |
) |
|
$ |
787 |
|
|
$ |
(509 |
) |
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash from operations during the three months ended
March 31, 2005 was $10.1 million, compared to
$6.0 million during the three months ended March 31,
2004. Cash from operations during 2004 was $34.2 million,
compared to $10.4 million in 2003 and $18.2 million in
2002.
Net cash used in investing activities was $109.2 million
for the first three months of 2005 and $0.8 million for the
comparable period in 2004. The amounts used in 2005 reflect both
capital expenditure purchases and the acquisition of Mayflower.
Net cash used in investing activities during 2004 was
$8.9 million, compared to $6.0 million in 2003 and
$4.9 million in 2002. All net cash used in investing
activities was for capital expenditures, primarily for equipment
and tooling purchases related to new or replacement programs and
current equipment upgrades. We continue to focus on cash
management and expect future annual capital expenditures to be
below the level of our annual depreciation expense.
Net cash from financing activities totaled $100.0 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2005, compared to net
cash used by financing activities of $7.7 million in the
same period of 2004. The net cash from financing activities in
2005 was principally related to the acquisition of Mayflower and
the amendment to our senior credit facility. Net cash used in
financing activities for 2004 totaled $28.4 million,
compared to $2.8 million in 2003 and $14.8 million
during 2002. The net cash used during 2004 and 2003 was
principally related to repayments of outstanding borrowings
under our senior credit facilities. The net cash used in 2002
was the result of $17.3 million of repayments under our
senior credit facilities, offset by the issuance of
$2.5 million of subordinated debt to certain of our
principal stockholders.
As of March 31, 2005, we had an aggregate of
$153.4 million of outstanding indebtedness excluding
$3.3 million of outstanding letters of credit under various
financing arrangements. We were in compliance with all of our
respective financial covenants under our debt and credit
facilities as of March 31, 2005.
In August 2004, in connection with our initial public offering,
we entered into a $105.0 million senior credit facility,
consisting of a $65.0 million term loan and a
$40.0 million revolving line of credit. We used borrowings
under the term loan, together with proceeds of the offering to
repay all of our existing borrowings under our then existing
senior credit facilities and to repay all of our then existing
subordinated indebtedness. In connection with this senior credit
facility, we recorded a loss in the third quarter of 2004 on the
early extinguishment of debt of approximately $1.6 million
related to unamortized deferred financings fees.
In February 2005, in connection with the Mayflower acquisition,
we amended our senior credit facility to increase the revolving
credit facility from $40.0 million to $75.0 million
and the term loans from $65.0 million to
$145.0 million. We used borrowings of approximately
$106.4 million under our amended senior credit facility to
fund substantially all of the purchase price for the Mayflower
acquisition.
43
As of March 31, 2005, we had outstanding indebtedness of
$5.9 million under our revolving credit facility and
$141.1 million under our term loan facility. The weighted
average rate on these borrowings, for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005, ranged from 6.7% with respect to the
revolving borrowings to 6.5% for the term loan borrowings and
7.1% for the foreign currency term loan borrowings.
In June 2005, in connection with the MWC acquisition, we amended
our senior credit facility to increase the revolving credit
facility from $75.0 million to $100.0 million. In
addition, the amendment increased certain baskets in the lien,
investments and asset disposition covenants to reflect the
Companys increased size as a result of the Mayflower and
MWC acquisitions. We used revolving credit borrowings of
approximately $58.0 million under our amended senior credit
facility to fund substantially all of the purchase price for the
MWC acquisition. Pro forma for the MWC acquisition, and the sale
of 1,500,000 shares of common stock by us pursuant to this
offering, the exercise of managements options to purchase
265,530 shares of our common stock and the application of the
net proceeds therefrom as described in Use of
Proceeds, we would have had outstanding indebtedness of
$36.7 million under our revolving credit facility and
$141.1 million under our term loan facility as of
March 31, 2005.
In connection with our concurrent senior notes offering, we
intend to enter into an additional amendment to our senior
credit facility which will provide for, among other things, the
incurrence of debt in connection with the senior notes offering
and the application of the net proceeds therefrom. Pro forma for
the MWC acquisition, our sale of 1,500,000 shares of common
stock and the exercise of managements options to purchase
265,530 shares of our common stock and the application of the
net proceeds therefrom as described in Use of
Proceeds, and our senior notes offering, we would have had
no outstanding indebtedness under our revolving credit facility
and $33.1 million under our term loan facility as of
March 31, 2005.
The revolving credit facility is available until
January 31, 2010 and the term loans are due and payable on
December 31, 2010. Based on the provisions of
EITF 96-19, Debtors Accounting for a Modification
or Exchange of Debt Instruments, approximately
$1.7 million third party fees relating to the credit
agreement were capitalized and are being amortized over the life
of the credit agreement.
Under the terms of our senior credit facility, availability
under the revolving credit facility is subject to the lesser of
(i) a borrowing base that is equal to the sum of
(a) 80% of eligible accounts receivable plus (b) 50%
of eligible inventory; or (ii) $100.0 million.
Borrowings under the senior credit facility bear interest at a
floating rate which can be either the prime rate or LIBOR plus
the applicable margin to the prime rate and LIBOR borrowings
based on our leverage ratio. The senior credit facility contains
various financial covenants, including a minimum fixed charge
coverage ratio of not less than 1.30, and a minimum ratio of
EBITDA to cash interest expense of not less than 2.50, in each
case for the twelve month period ending on December 31 of
each year, a limitation on the amount of capital expenditures of
not more than $25.0 million in any fiscal year and a
maximum ratio of total indebtedness to EBITDA as of the last day
of each fiscal quarter as set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum | |
|
|
Total Leverage | |
Quarter(s) Ending |
|
Ratio | |
|
|
| |
3/31/05 through 9/30/05
|
|
|
3.00 to 1.00 |
|
12/31/05 through 9/30/06
|
|
|
2.75 to 1.00 |
|
12/31/06 and each fiscal quarter thereafter
|
|
|
2.50 to 1.00 |
|
The senior credit facility also contains covenants restricting
certain corporate actions, including asset dispositions,
acquisitions, dividends, changes of control, incurring
indebtedness, making loans and investments and transactions with
affiliates. If we do not comply with such covenants or satisfy
such ratios, our lenders could declare a default under the
senior credit facility, and our indebtedness thereunder could be
declared immediately due and payable. The senior credit facility
is collateralized by substantially all of our assets. The senior
credit facility also contains customary events of default.
In addition, as of March 31, 2005, we also had
$6.5 million of indebtedness from borrowings financed
through the issuance of industrial development bonds relating to
our Vonore, Tennessee facility. These
44
borrowings had a final maturity of August 1, 2006 and bore
interest at a variable rate which was adjusted on a weekly basis
by the placement agent such that the interest rate on the bonds
was sufficient to cause the market value of the bonds to be
equal to, as nearly as practicable, 100% of their principal
amount. As of March 31, 2005, this interest rate was 2.5%.
On May 2, 2005 we redeemed these bonds for approximately
$6.5 million.
We believe that cash flow from operating activities together
with available borrowings under our senior credit facility will
be sufficient to fund currently anticipated working capital,
planned capital spending and debt service requirements for at
least the next twelve months. Capital expenditures for fiscal
2005 are anticipated to be approximately $21 million. We
regularly review acquisition and additional opportunities, which
may require additional debt or equity financing.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
The following tables reflect our contractual obligations as of
December 31, 2004 on an actual and pro forma basis giving
effect to the Mayflower acquisition, the MWC acquisition, the
sale of 1,500,000 shares of common stock by us pursuant to
this offering, the exercise of managements options to
purchase 265,530 shares of our common stock and the application
of the net proceeds therefrom as described in Use of
Proceeds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Less than | |
|
|
|
More than | |
|
|
Total | |
|
1 Year | |
|
1-3 Years | |
|
3-5 Years | |
|
5 Years | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Long-term debt obligations
|
|
$ |
53,925 |
|
|
$ |
4,884 |
|
|
$ |
19,320 |
|
|
$ |
22,585 |
|
|
$ |
7,136 |
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
17,480 |
|
|
|
5,082 |
|
|
|
7,141 |
|
|
|
4,724 |
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
71,405 |
|
|
$ |
9,966 |
|
|
$ |
26,461 |
|
|
$ |
27,309 |
|
|
$ |
7,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Less than | |
|
|
|
More than | |
|
|
Total | |
|
1 Year | |
|
1-3 Years | |
|
3-5 Years | |
|
5 Years | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Long-term debt obligations
|
|
$ |
185,738 |
|
|
$ |
15,534 |
|
|
$ |
47,088 |
|
|
$ |
101,409 |
|
|
$ |
21,707 |
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
21,651 |
|
|
|
6,703 |
|
|
|
9,006 |
|
|
|
5,409 |
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
207,389 |
|
|
$ |
22,237 |
|
|
$ |
56,094 |
|
|
$ |
106,818 |
|
|
$ |
22,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to the obligations noted above, we have obligations
reported as other long-term liabilities that consist principally
of pension and postretirement benefits, facility closure and
consolidation costs, forward contracts, loss contracts and other
items. We also enter into agreements with our customers at the
beginning of a given platforms life to supply products for
the entire life of that vehicle platform, which is typically
five to seven years. These agreements generally provide for the
supply of a customers production requirements for a
particular platform, rather than for the purchase of a specific
quantity of products. Accordingly, our obligations under these
agreements are not reflected in the contractual obligations
table above.
As of December 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005, we were
not party to significant purchase obligations for goods or
services.
45
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We use standby letters of credit to guarantee our performance
under various contracts and arrangements, principally in
connection with our workers compensation liabilities and for
leases on equipment and facilities. These letter of credit
contracts are usually extended on a year-to-year basis. As of
December 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005, we had
outstanding letters of credit of $2.8 million and
$3.3 million respectively. We do not believe that these
letters of credit will be required to be drawn.
We currently have no non-consolidated special purpose entity
arrangements.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in
Note 2 of our consolidated financial statements. Certain of
our accounting policies require the application of significant
judgment by us in selecting appropriate assumptions for
calculating financial estimates. By their nature, these
judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. On
an ongoing basis, we evaluate estimates, including those related
to revenue recognition and sales commitments, valuation of
goodwill, accounting for income taxes and defined benefit
pension plan assumptions. We base our estimates on historical
experience and assumptions believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances. Those estimates form the basis for our judgments
that affect the amounts reported in our financial statements.
Ultimate results could differ from our estimates under different
assumptions or conditions.
Revenue Recognition and Sales Commitments. We recognize
revenue as our products are shipped from our facilities to our
customers, which is when title passes to the customer for
substantially all of our sales. We enter into agreements with
our customers at the beginning of a given platforms life
to supply products for that platform. Once we enter into such
agreements, fulfillment of our purchasing requirements is our
obligation for the entire production life of the platform, with
terms generally ranging from five to seven years, and we have no
provisions to terminate such contracts. In certain instances, we
may be committed under existing agreements to supply product to
our customers at selling prices that are not sufficient to cover
the direct cost to produce such product. In such situations, we
record a liability for the estimated future amount of such
losses. Such losses are recognized at the time that the loss is
probable and reasonably estimable and are recorded at the
minimum amount necessary to fulfill our obligations to our
customers. The estimated amount of such losses was approximately
$0.6 million at December 31, 2004. We believe such
estimate is reasonable and we do not anticipate additional
losses; however, any change in the estimate will result in a
change in period income (loss). We are subjected to warranty
claims for products that fail to perform as expected due to
design or manufacturing deficiencies. Customers continue to
require their outside suppliers to guarantee or warrant their
products and bear the cost of repair or replacement of such
products. Depending on the terms under which we supplied
products to our customers, a customer may hold us responsible
for some or all of the repair or replacement costs of defective
products, when the product supplied did not perform as
represented. Our policy is to reserve for estimated future
customer warranty costs based on historical trends and current
economic factors.
Valuation of Goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of
the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired.
Under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives
are no longer amortized, but reviewed for impairment annually or
more frequently if impairment indicators arise. Separable
intangible assets that are not deemed to have indefinite lives
will continue to be amortized over their useful lives. The
amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142 apply to
goodwill and intangible assets acquired after June 30,
2001. We adopted SFAS No. 142 effective
January 1, 2002.
Upon adoption of SFAS No. 142, we completed step one
of the transitional goodwill impairment test, using a
combination of valuation techniques, including the discounted
cash flow approach and the market multiple approach, for each of
our three reporting units. Upon completion of the required
assessments under SFAS No. 142, we determined that the
fair market value of the goodwill assigned to two of our
reporting units was lower than its book value, resulting in an
after-tax transitional impairment charge of approximately
$51.6 million. The write-off was recorded as a cumulative
effect of a change in accounting
46
principle in our consolidated statement of operations for the
quarter ended March 31, 2002. Under the valuation
techniques and approach applied by us in our
SFAS No. 142 analysis, a change in certain key
assumptions applied, such as the discount rate, projected future
cash flows and mix of cash flows by geographic region could
significantly impact the results of our assessment. The
estimates we used are based upon reasonable and supportable
assumptions and consider all available evidence. However, there
is inherent uncertainty in estimating future cash flows and
termination values.
We perform impairment tests annually, during the second quarter,
and whenever events or circumstances occur indicating that
goodwill or other intangible assets might be impaired. Based
upon our 2004 annual assessment, no impairment of goodwill was
deemed to have occurred.
Accounting for Income Taxes. As part of the process of
preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required
to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in
which we operate. In addition, tax expense includes the impact
of differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes
which result in deferred tax assets and liabilities which are
included in our consolidated balance sheet. To the extent that
recovery of deferred tax assets is not likely, we must establish
a valuation allowance. Significant judgment is required in
determining our provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets
and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our
net deferred tax assets. As of December 31, 2003, we had
recorded a valuation allowance of $3.8 million. As of
December 31, 2004, we determined that we no longer require
a valuation allowance due to the likelihood of recovery in
future periods. In the event that our actual results differ from
our estimates or we adjust these estimates in future periods,
the effects of these adjustments could materially impact our
financial position and results of operations. The net deferred
tax asset as of December 31, 2004 was $14.1 million.
Commercial Vehicle Group Defined Benefit Pension Plan. We
sponsor a defined benefit pension plan that covers certain of
our hourly and salaried employees at our United Kingdom
operations. Our policy is to make annual contributions to this
plan to fund the normal cost as required by local regulations.
In calculating obligation and expense, we are required to make
certain actuarial assumptions. These assumptions include
discount rate, expected long-term rate of return on plan assets
and rates of increase in compensation. Our assumptions are
determined based on current market conditions, historical
information and consultation with and input from our actuaries.
We have historically used December 31 as our annual
measurement date. For 2004, we assumed a discount rate of 5.50%
to determine our benefit obligations. Holding other variables
constant (such as expected return on plan assets and rate of
compensation increase), a one percentage point decrease in the
discount rate would have increased our expense by
$0.2 million and our benefit obligation by
$8.1 million.
We employ a building block approach in determining the expected
long-term rate of return for plan assets, based on historical
markets, long-term historical relationships between equities and
fixed income investments and considering current market factors
such as inflation and interest rates. Holding other variables
constant (such as discount rate and rate of compensation
increase), a one percentage point decrease in the expected
long-term rate of return on plan assets would have increased our
expense by $0.3 million. We expect to contribute
approximately $1.2 million to our pension plans in 2005.
We employ a total return investment approach in managing pension
plan assets whereby a mix of equities and fixed income
investments are used to maximize the long-term return of plan
assets for a prudent level of risk. At December 31, 2004,
our pension assets were comprised of 52% equity securities, 25%
debt securities and 23% other investments.
Mayflower Defined Benefit Pension Plan and Postretirement
Benefits. As part of the Mayflower acquisition, we also
sponsor three defined benefit plans and two postretirement
benefit plans that cover certain hourly and salaried Mayflower
employees. Our policy is to make annual contributions to the
defined benefit plans to fund the normal cost as required by
federal regulations. In calculating the obligations and expenses
for the plans, we are required to make certain actuarial
assumptions. These assumptions include discount rate, expected
long-term rate of return on plan assets, rates of increase in
compensation, and rate of increase in the per capita cost of
covered health care benefits. Our assumptions are determined
based on current market conditions, historical information and
consultation with and input
47
from our actuaries. Mayflower has historically used
December 31 as the annual measurement date. For 2004,
Mayflower assumed a discount rate of 6.00% for the defined
benefit pension plans and 5.7% for the postretirement benefit
plans to determine the benefit obligations. Holding other
variables constant for our defined benefit pension plans (such
as expected return on plan assets and rate of compensation
increase), a one percentage point decrease in the discount rate
would have increased our expense by $0.5 million and our
benefit obligation by $4.4 million.
We employ a building block approach in determining the expected
long-term rate of return for plan assets, based on historical
markets, long-term historical relationships between equities and
fixed income investments and considering current market factors
such as inflation and interest rates. Holding other variables
constant for the Mayflower defined benefit pension plans (such
as discount rate and rate of compensation increase), a one
percentage point decrease in the expected rate of return on plan
assets would have increased our expense by $0.2 million. We
expect to contribute approximately $1.049 million to the
Mayflower pension plans in 2005.
We employ a total return investment approach in managing the
Mayflower pension plan assets whereby a mix of equities and
fixed income investments are used to maximize the long-term
return of plan assets for a prudent level of risk. At
December 31, 2004, the Mayflower pension assets were
comprised of 40% fixed income securities and 60% equity
securities.
While any negative impact of these Critical Accounting Policies
and Estimates would generally result in noncash charges to
earnings, the severity of any charge and its impact on
stockholders investment could adversely affect our
borrowing agreements, cost of capital and ability to raise
external capital. Our senior management has reviewed these
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates with the audit
committee of our board of directors, and the audit committee has
reviewed its disclosure in this management discussion and
analysis.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 132R, a
revision to SFAS No. 132, Employers
Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement
Benefits. SFAS No. 132R does not change the
measurement or recognition related to pension and other
postretirement plans required by SFAS No. 87,
Employers Accounting for Pensions,
SFAS No. 88, Employers Accounting for
Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans
and for Termination Benefits, and SFAS No. 106,
Employers Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other
Than Pensions, and retains the disclosure requirements
contained in SFAS No. 132. SFAS No. 132R
requires additional disclosures about the assets, obligations,
cash flows and net periodic benefit cost of defined benefit
pension plans and other defined benefit postretirement plans.
SFAS No. 132R is effective for financial statements
with fiscal years ending after December 15, 2003, with the
exception of disclosure requirements related to foreign plans
and estimated future benefit payments which are effective for
fiscal years ending after June 15, 2004. We have adopted
the new disclosure requirements as effective in 2004.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,
Inventory Costs. SFAS No. 151 requires that
abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling
costs, and spoilage be recognized as current-period charges. The
Statement also requires that fixed production overhead be
allocated to conversion costs based on the normal capacity of
the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 is effective
for inventory costs incurred by the Company beginning in fiscal
year 2006. We are in the process of determining the impact
adoption of SFAS No. 151 will have on our results of
operations.
In December 2004, the FASB revised SFAS No. 123,
Share Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R).
SFAS No. 123R supercedes Accounting Principles Board
(APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued
to Employees, which resulted in no stock-based employee
compensation cost related to stock options if the options
granted had an exercise price equal to the market value of the
underlying common stock on the date of grant.
SFAS No. 123R requires recognition of employee
services provided in exchange for a share-based payment based on
the grant date fair market value. We are required to adopt
SFAS No. 123R as of July 1, 2005. As of the
effective date, SFAS No. 123R applies to all new awards
48
issued as well as awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled.
Additionally, for stock-based awards issued prior to the
effective date, compensation cost attributable to future
services will be recognized as the remaining service is
rendered. We may also elect to restate prior periods by applying
a modified retrospective method to periods prior to the
effective date. We are in the process of determining which
method of adoption we will elect as well as the potential impact
on our consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to various market risks, including changes in
foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. Market risk
is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market
rates and prices, such as foreign currency exchange and interest
rates. We do not enter into derivatives or other financial
instruments for trading or speculative purposes. We do enter
into financial instruments, from time to time, to manage and
reduce the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates
and interest rates and to hedge a portion of future anticipated
currency transactions of our United Kingdom operations. The
counterparties are major financial institutions.
We manage our interest rate risk by balancing the amount of our
fixed rate and variable rate debt and through the use of
interest rate protection agreements. The objective of the
interest rate protection agreements is to more effectively
balance our borrowing costs and interest rate risk and reduce
financing costs. For fixed rate debt, interest rate changes
affect the fair market value of such debt but do not impact
earnings or cash flows. Conversely for variable rate debt,
interest rate changes generally do not affect the fair market
value of such debt, but do impact future earnings and cash
flows, assuming other factors are held constant. At
March 31, 2005, all of our debt was variable rate debt.
Holding other variables constant (such as foreign exchange rates
and debt levels), a one percentage point change in interest
rates would be expected to have an impact on pre-tax earnings
and cash flows for the next year of approximately
$1.5 million. The impact on the fair market value of our
debt at March 31, 2005 would have been insignificant. On a
pro forma basis, a one percentage point change in interest rates
would be expected to have an impact on pre-tax earnings and cash
flows for the next year of approximately $1.8 million, the
impact of which on the fair market value of our debt at
March 31, 2005 would have been insignificant.
At March 31, 2005, we had a rate cap agreement in place
that capped the interest rate at 6.0% on $30 million of our
variable rate indebtedness. Outstanding foreign currency forward
exchange contracts at March 31, 2005 are more fully
described in the notes to our financial statements included
elsewhere in this filing. The fair value of these contracts at
March 31, 2005 amounted to a net asset of
$3.3 million, which is reflected in other assets in our
condensed March 31, 2005 balance sheet. None of these
contracts have been designated as cash flow hedges; thus, the
change in fair value at each reporting date is reflected as a
noncash charge (income) in our statement of operations. We may
designate future forward exchange contracts as cash flow hedges.
Foreign currency risk is the risk that we will incur economic
losses due to adverse changes in foreign currency exchange
rates. We use forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign
currency translation exposures of our United Kingdom operations.
We estimate our projected revenues and purchases in certain
foreign currencies or locations, and will hedge a portion or all
of the anticipated long or short position. The contracts
typically run from three months up to three years. These
contracts are marked-to-market and the fair value is included in
assets (liabilities) in our balance sheets, with the
offsetting noncash gain or loss included in our statements of
operations. We do not hold or issue foreign exchange options or
forward contracts for trading purposes.
Our primary exposures to foreign currency exchange fluctuations
are pound sterling/ Eurodollar and pound sterling/ Japanese yen.
At March 31, 2005, the potential reduction in earnings from
a hypothetical instantaneous 10% adverse change in quoted
foreign currency spot rates applied to foreign currency
49
sensitive instruments would not have been significant. The
foreign currency sensitivity model is limited by the assumption
that all of the foreign currencies to which we are exposed would
simultaneously decrease by 10% because such synchronized changes
are unlikely to occur. The effects of the forward exchange
contracts have been included in the above analysis; however, the
sensitivity model does not include the inherent risks associated
with the anticipated future transactions denominated in foreign
currency.
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Transactions |
A significant portion of our revenues during the three months
ended March 31, 2005 and the year ended December 31,
2004 were derived from manufacturing operations outside of the
United States. The results of operations and the financial
position of our operations in these other countries are
principally measured in their respective currency and translated
into U.S. dollars. A significant portion of the expenses
generated in these countries is in currencies different from
which revenue is generated. As discussed above, from time to
time, we enter into forward exchange contracts to mitigate a
portion of this currency risk. The reported income of these
subsidiaries will be higher or lower depending on a weakening or
strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the respective
foreign currency.
A significant portion of our assets at March 31, 2005 are
based in our foreign operations and are translated into
U.S. dollars at foreign currency exchange rates in effect
as of the end of each period, with the effect of such
translation reflected as a separate component of
stockholders investment. Accordingly, our
stockholders investment will fluctuate depending upon the
weakening or strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the
respective foreign currency.
Effects of Inflation
Inflation potentially affects us in two principal ways. First, a
significant portion of our debt is tied to prevailing short-term
interest rates that may change as a result of inflation rates,
translating into changes in interest expense. Second, general
inflation can impact material purchases, labor and other costs.
In many cases, we have limited ability to pass through
inflation-related cost increases due to the competitive nature
of the markets that we serve. In the past few years, however,
inflation has not been a significant factor.
50
INDUSTRY
Within the commercial vehicle industry, we sell our products
primarily to the heavy truck segment of the North American OEM
market (54% of our 2004 sales), the North American aftermarket
and OEM service organizations for use in heavy trucks (11% of
our 2004 sales) and the construction segments of the global OEM
market (18% of our 2004 sales). The majority of our remaining
17% of 2004 sales were to other global commercial vehicle
markets.
Commercial Vehicle Supply Market Overview
Commercial vehicles are used in a wide variety of end markets,
including local and long-haul commercial trucking, bus,
construction, mining, general industrial, marine, municipal and
recreation. The commercial vehicle supply industry can generally
be separated into two categories: (1) sales to OEMs, in
which products are sold in relatively large quantities directly
for use by OEMs in new commercial vehicles; and
(2) aftermarket sales, in which products are
sold as replacements in varying quantities to a wide range of
OEM service organizations, wholesalers, retailers and
installers. In the OEM market, suppliers are generally divided
into tiers Tier 1 suppliers (like
our company), who provide their products directly to OEMs, and
Tier 2 or Tier 3 suppliers,
who sell their products principally to other suppliers for
integration into those suppliers own product offerings.
Our largest end-market segment, the commercial truck industry,
is supplied by heavy- and medium-duty commercial truck
suppliers. The commercial truck supplier industry is highly
fragmented and comprised of several large companies and many
smaller companies. In addition, the heavy-duty (Class 8)
truck supplier industry is characterized by relatively low
production volumes as well as considerable barriers to entry,
including the following: (1) significant capital investment
requirements, (2) stringent OEM technical and manufacturing
requirements, (3) high switching costs to shift production
to new suppliers, (4) just-in-time delivery requirements to
meet OEM needs and (5) strong brand name recognition.
Foreign competition is limited in the North American commercial
vehicle market due to many factors, including the need to be
responsive to order changes on short notice, high shipping
costs, customer concerns about quality given the safety aspect
of many of our products and service requirements.
Although OEM demand for our products is directly correlated with
new vehicle production, suppliers like us also can grow by
increasing their product content per vehicle through cross
selling and bundling of products, further penetrating business
with existing customers and gaining new customers and expanding
into new geographic markets. We believe that companies with a
global presence and advanced technology, engineering,
manufacturing and support capabilities, such as our company, are
well positioned to take advantage of these opportunities.
Commercial Truck Market
Purchasers of commercial trucks include fleet operators, owner
operators and other industrial end users. Commercial vehicles
used for local and long-haul commercial trucking are generally
classified by gross vehicle weight. Class 8 vehicles are
trucks with gross weight in excess of 33,000 lbs. and
Class 5 through 7 vehicles are trucks with gross weight
from 16,001 lbs. to 33,000 lbs. The following table shows
commercial vehicle production levels for 2000 through 2004 in
North America:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Thousands of units) | |
Class 8 heavy trucks
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
Class 5 7 light and medium-duty trucks
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: ACT Research (February and May 2005).
51
The following describes the major segments of the commercial
vehicle market in which we compete:
The global Class 8 truck manufacturing market is
concentrated in three primary regions: North America,
Asia-Pacific and Europe. We believe that North America has the
largest truck market of these three regions. The global
Class 8 truck market is localized in nature due to the
following factors: (1) the prohibitive costs of shipping
components from one region to another, (2) the high degree
of customization of Class 8 trucks to meet the
region-specific demands of end users, and (3) the ability
to meet just-in-time delivery requirements. According to ACT,
four companies represented approximately 100% of North American
Class 8 truck production in 2004. The percentages of
Class 8 production represented by Freightliner, PACCAR,
International and Volvo/ Mack were 36%, 25%, 20% and 19%,
respectively. We supply products to all of these OEMs.
Production of commercial vehicles in North America peaked in
1999 and experienced a downturn from 2000 to 2003 that was due
to a weak economy, reduced sales following above-normal
purchases in advance of new EPA emissions standards, an
oversupply of new and used vehicle inventory and lower spending
on commercial vehicles and equipment. Following a substantial
decline from 1999 to 2001, truck unit production increased
modestly to 181,000 units in 2002 from 146,000 units
produced in 2001, due primarily to the purchasing of trucks that
occurred prior to the October 2002 mandate for more stringent
engine emissions requirements. Subsequent to the purchasing of
trucks, truck production continued to remain at historically low
levels due to the continuing economic recession and the
reluctance of many trucking companies to invest during this
period.
In mid-2003, evidence of renewed growth emerged and truck
tonmiles (number of miles driven multiplied by number of tons
transported) began to increase. Accompanying the increase in
truck tonmiles, new truck sales also began to increase. During
the second half of 2003, new truck dealer inventories declined
and, consequently, OEM truck order backlogs began to increase.
According to ACT, monthly truck order rates began increasing
significantly in December 2003. Class 8 net truck orders
for 2004 were approximately 262,000 units, up 43% from
approximately 184,000 units in 2003. Since 2003, all of the
major OEMs have increased their truck build rates to meet the
increased demand.
The following table illustrates North American Class 8
truck build for the years 1998 to 2009:
North American Class 8 Truck Build Rates
(In thousands)
E Estimated
Source: ACT Research (February and May 2005).
According to ACT, unit production for 2005 is estimated to
increase approximately 22% over 2004 levels to
327,000 units. According to the same source, truck unit
production is expected to continue increasing in 2006, with
projected unit production of 346,000 units. We believe that
this projected increase
52
is due to several factors, including (1) improvement in the
general economy in North America, which is expected to lead to
growth in the industrial sector, (2) corresponding growth
in the movement of goods, which is expected to lead to demand
for new trucks and increasing requirements of logistics
companies, (3) rising hauler profits, (4) the growing
acceptance of new engines and (5) under-investment during
the recent recession and the growing need to replace aging truck
fleets. ACT forecasts unit production to decline in 2007, due
primarily to an increase in purchasing of trucks forecasted to
occur in anticipation of the institution of more stringent EPA
emissions standards in 2007.
We believe the following factors are currently driving the North
American Class 8 truck market:
Economic Conditions. The North American truck industry is
directly influenced by overall economic growth and consumer
spending. Since truck OEMs supply the fleet lines of North
America, their production levels generally match the demand for
freight. The freight carried by these trucks includes consumer
goods, machinery, food and beverages, construction equipment and
supplies, electronic equipment and a wide variety of other
materials. Since most of these items are driven by macroeconomic
conditions, the truck industry tends to follow trends of gross
domestic product, or GDP. Generally, given the dependence of
North American shippers on trucking as a freight alternative,
general economic conditions have been a primary indicator of
future truck builds.
Truck Freight Growth. ACT projects that total domestic
truck freight will continue to increase over the next five
years, driven by growth in GDP. In addition, national suppliers
and distribution centers, burdened by the pricing pressure of
large manufacturing and retail customers, have continued to
reduce on-site inventory levels. This reduction requires freight
handlers to provide to-the-hour delivery options. As
a result, Class 8 heavy-duty trucks have replaced
manufacturing warehouses as the preferred temporary storage
facility for inventory. Since trucks are typically viewed as the
most reliable and flexible shipping alternative, truck tonmiles,
as well as truck platform improvements, should continue to
increase in order to meet the increasing need for flexibility
under the just-in-time system. ACT forecasts that total
heavy-duty truck tonmiles will increase from 2,619 billion
in 2004 to 2,999 billion in 2009, as summarized in the
following graph:
Total U.S. Tonmiles (Class 8)
(Number of tonmiles in billions)
E Estimated
Source: ACT Research (February and May 2005).
53
Truck Replacement Cycle and Fleet Aging. In 2002, the
average age of Class 8 trucks passed the ten-year average
of 5.5 years. In 2003, the average age increased further to
5.9 years. The average fleet age tends to run in cycles as
freight companies permit their truck fleets to age during
periods of lagging demand and then replenish those fleets during
periods of increasing demand. Additionally, as truck fleets age,
their maintenance costs increase. Freight companies must
therefore continually evaluate the economics between repair and
replacement. Other factors, such as inventory management and the
growth in less-than-truckload freight shipping, also tend to
increase fleet mileage and, as a result, the truck replacement
cycle. The chart below illustrates the average age of active
U.S. Class 8 trucks:
Average Age of Active U.S. Class 8 Trucks
(Number of years)
Source: ACT Research (October 2004).
Suppliers Relationships with OEMs. Supplier
relationships with OEMs are long-term, close and cooperative in
nature. OEMs must expend both time and resources to work with
suppliers to form an efficient and trusted operating
relationship. Following this investment, and in some cases, the
designation of a supplier as standard, OEMs are typically
hesitant to change suppliers given the potential for disruptions
in production.
|
|
|
Commercial Truck Aftermarket |
Demand for aftermarket products tends to be less cyclical than
OEM demand because vehicle owners are more likely to repair
vehicles than purchase new ones during recessionary periods, and
thus aftermarket demand generally is more stable during such
periods. Demand for aftermarket products is driven by the
quality of OEM parts, the number of vehicles in operation, the
average age of the vehicle fleet, vehicle usage, the average
useful life of vehicle parts and total tonmiles. The aftermarket
is a growing market, as the overall size of the North American
fleet of Class 8 trucks has continued to increase and is
attractive because of the recurring nature of the sales.
Additionally, aftermarket sales tend to be at a higher margin,
as truck component suppliers are able to leverage their already
established fixed cost base and exert moderate pricing power
with their replacement parts. The recurring nature of
aftermarket revenue provides some insulation to the overall
cyclical nature of the industry, as it tends to provide a more
stable stream of revenues.
|
|
|
Commercial Construction Vehicle Market |
Purchasers of heavy construction equipment (weighing over 12
metric tons) include construction companies, municipalities,
local governments, rental fleet owners, quarrying and mining
companies, waste management companies and forestry related
concerns. Purchasers of light construction equipment (weighing
under 12 metric tons) include contractors, rental fleet owners,
landscapers, logistics companies and farmers. Sales of heavy
construction equipment are particularly dependent on the level
of major infrastructure construction and repair projects such as
highways, dams and harbors, which is a function of government
spending and economic growth. The principal factor influencing
sales of light construction
54
equipment is the level of residential and commercial
construction, remodeling and renovation, which in turn is
influenced by interest rates.
|
|
|
Military Equipment Market |
We supply products for heavy- and medium-payload tactical trucks
that are used by the U.S. military and other foreign
militaries. Sales and production of these vehicles are
influenced by overall defense spending both by the
U.S. government and foreign governments and the presence of
military conflicts and potential military conflicts throughout
the world. Demand for these vehicles is expected to increase as
the result of the continuing conflict in the Middle East.
Additionally, demand has also increased for remanufacturing and
replacement of the large fleet of vehicles that have served in
the Middle East due to over-use and new armor and technology
requirements.
Commercial Vehicle Industry Trends
Our performance and growth are directly related to trends in the
commercial vehicle market that are focused on end-user
retention, comfort and safety. These commercial vehicle industry
trends include the following:
System Sourcing. Commercial vehicle OEMs are beginning to
seek suppliers capable of providing fully-engineered, complete
systems rather than suppliers who produce the separate parts
that comprise a system. By outsourcing complete systems, OEMs
are able to reduce the costs associated with the design and
integration of different components and improve quality by
requiring their suppliers to assemble and test major portions of
the vehicle prior to beginning production. In addition, OEMs are
able to develop more efficient assembly processes when complete
systems are delivered in sequence rather than as individual
parts or components.
Globalization of Suppliers. To serve multiple markets
more cost effectively, many commercial vehicle OEMs are
manufacturing global vehicle platforms that are designed in a
single location but are produced and sold in many different
geographic markets around the world. Having operations in the
geographic markets in which OEMs produce their global platforms
enables suppliers to meet OEMs needs more economically and
more efficiently.
Shift of Design and Engineering to Suppliers. OEMs are
focusing their efforts on brand development and overall vehicle
design, instead of the design of individual vehicle systems.
OEMs are increasingly looking to their suppliers to provide
suggestions for new products, designs, engineering developments
and manufacturing processes. As a result, Tier 1 suppliers
are gaining increased access to confidential planning
information regarding OEMs future vehicle designs and
manufacturing processes. Systems and modules increase the
importance of Tier 1 suppliers because they generally
increase the Tier 1 suppliers percentage of vehicle
content.
Broad Manufacturing Capabilities. With respect to
commercial vehicle interiors, OEMs are requiring their suppliers
to manufacture interior systems and products utilizing
alternative materials and processes in order to meet OEMs
demand for customized styling or cost requirements. In addition,
while OEMs seek to differentiate their vehicles through the
introduction of innovative interior features, suppliers are
proactively developing new interior products with enhanced
features.
Ongoing Supplier Consolidation. The worldwide commercial
vehicle supply industry is in the early stages of consolidating
as suppliers seek to achieve operating synergies through
business combinations, shift production to locations with more
flexible work rules and practices, acquire complementary
technologies, build stronger customer relationships and follow
their OEM customers as they expand globally. Suppliers need to
provide OEMs with single-point sourcing of integrated systems
and modules on a global basis, and this is expected to drive
further industry consolidation. Furthermore, the cost focus of
most major OEMs has forced suppliers to reduce costs and improve
productivity on an ongoing basis, including by achieving
economies of scale through consolidation.
55
BUSINESS
Our Company
We are a leading supplier of fully integrated system solutions
for the global commercial vehicle market, including the
heavy-duty truck market, the construction and agriculture
markets and the specialty and military transportation markets.
As a result of our strong leadership in cab-related products and
systems, we are positioned to benefit from the increased focus
of our customers on cab design and comfort and convenience
features to better serve their end user, the driver. Our
products include suspension seat systems, interior trim systems
(including instrument panels, door panels, headliners, cabinetry
and floor systems), cab structures and components, mirrors,
wiper systems, electronic wire harness assemblies and controls
and switches specifically designed for applications in
commercial vehicles.
We are differentiated from suppliers to the automotive industry
by our ability to manufacture low volume customized products on
a sequenced basis to meet the requirements of our customers. We
believe that we have the number one or two position in most of
our major markets and that we are the only supplier in the North
American commercial vehicle market that can offer complete cab
systems including cab body assemblies, sleeper boxes, seats,
interior trim, flooring, wire harnesses, panel assemblies and
other structural components. We believe our products are used by
virtually every major North American commercial vehicle OEM,
which we believe creates an opportunity to cross-sell our
products and offer a fully integrated system solution.
We pursue growth in sales and earnings by offering our customers
innovative products and system solutions, emphasizing continuous
improvement in the operating performance of our businesses and
by acquiring businesses that expand our product range, augment
our system solution capabilities, strengthen our customer
relationships and expand our geographic footprint. In the past
four months, we have separately acquired two commercial vehicle
supply businesses that meet these acquisition criteria.
|
|
|
|
|
On February 7, 2005, we acquired substantially all of the
assets and liabilities related to Mayflower Vehicle
Systems North American Commercial Vehicle Operations for
$107.5 million. This acquisition makes us the only
non-captive producer of steel and aluminum cabs and sleeper box
assemblies for the North American Class 8 truck market. The
Mayflower acquisition will allow us to offer our truck customers
a completely furnished vehicle cab and provide us earlier
visibility on cab structure designs and concepts, which will
provide us with advantages in our other cab products. |
|
|
|
On June 3, 2005 we acquired the stock of Monona Corporation, the
parent of MWC, for $55.0 million. MWC specializes in low
volume electronic wire harnesses and instrument panel assemblies
and also assembles cabs for the construction market. The MWC
acquisition will enhance our ability to offer integrated
electronics and instrument panel assemblies, expand our cab
assembly capabilities into new end markets and provide us with a
world class Mexican assembly operation strategically
located near several of our existing OEM customers. |
Approximately 59% of our pro forma 2004 sales were to the
leading heavy-duty truck OEMs, Freightliner (DaimlerChrysler),
PACCAR, International (Navistar) and Volvo/ Mack. The MWC
acquisition increases our presence in the construction and
agriculture market particularly at Caterpillar and
Deere & Co., as well as Oshkosh Truck Corporation, a
leader in manufacturing specialty, emergency and military
vehicles, which we believe are less cyclical than certain of our
other markets. Approximately 84% of our pro forma 2004 sales
were in North America, with the balance in Europe and Asia. The
following charts depict our 2004 pro forma net sales by product
category, end market served, and customer served.
56
Demand for commercial vehicles is expected to continue to
improve in 2005 due to a variety of factors, including a broad
economic recovery in North America, the need to replace aging
truck fleets as a result of under-investment, increasing freight
volumes and improving hauler profits. According to ACT Research,
the North American heavy-duty (Class 8) unit build rates
are expected to grow from 269,000 units in 2004 to over
341,000 units in 2009, a compound annual growth rate of 5%.
This trend is reflected in the North American heavy-duty
(Class 8) quarterly production of approximately
81,000 units in the three months ended March 31, 2005,
an increase of 48% from the same period in 2004. The medium-duty
truck, commercial and heavy equipment, and military and
specialty vehicle markets tend to be less cyclical than the
heavy-duty (Class 8) market and are growing due to a broad
economic recovery, improved technologies in commercial vehicles
and equipment and the acceleration of worldwide purchases due to
growth in the end markets served by our customers. The market
for construction equipment is particularly dependent on the
level of major infrastructure construction and repair projects
such as highways, dams and harbors, which is in the early stages
of growth due to broad economic recovery and developing market
expansion, particularly in Asia.
For the year ended December 31, 2004 and the three months
ended March 31, 2005, our sales were $380.4 million
and $152.4 million, respectively, and our net income was
$17.4 million and $10.9 million, respectively. Pro
forma sales for the year ended December 31, 2004 and the
three months ended March 31, 2005, would have been
$671.0 million and $200.3 million, respectively, and
pro forma net income would have been $28.8 million and
$13.3 million, respectively. At March 31, 2005, on a
pro forma basis after giving effect to the MWC acquisition, this
offering, the exercise of managements options to purchase
265,530 shares of our common stock and the application of
the net proceeds therefrom as described under Use of
Proceeds, we would have had total indebtedness of
$184.4 million and stockholders equity of
$144.5 million.
Our Competitive Strengths
We believe that our competitive strengths include the following:
Leading Market Positions and Brands. We believe that we
are the leading supplier of seating systems and interior trim
products, the only non-captive manufacturer of Class 8
truck body systems (which includes cab body assemblies), the
second largest supplier of wiper systems and mirrors for the
North American commercial vehicle market and the largest global
supplier of construction vehicle seating systems. Our products
are marketed under brand names that are well known by our
customers and truck fleet operators. These brands include KAB
Seating, National Seating, Trim Systems, Sprague Devices,
Sprague Controls,
Prutsmantm,
Moto
Mirrortm,
RoadWatch® and Mayflower®. The Mayflower and MWC
acquisitions gave us the capability to achieve market leadership
across a broader spectrum of commercial vehicle systems,
including complete truck cab assemblies and electrical wire
systems. We expect to benefit from leveraging our customer
relationships and dedicated sales force to cross-sell a broader
range of
57
products and position ourselves as the leading provider of
complete cab systems to the commercial vehicle marketplace.
Comprehensive Cab Product and Cab System Solutions. We
believe that we offer the broadest product range of any
commercial vehicle cab supplier. We manufacture approximately 50
product categories, many of which are critical to the interior
and exterior subsystems of a commercial vehicle cab. In
addition, through our acquisitions of Mayflower and MWC, we
believe we are the only supplier worldwide with the capability
to offer complete cab systems in sequence, integrating interior
trim and seats with the cab structure and the electronic wire
harness and instrument panel assemblies. We also utilize a
variety of different processes, such as urethane molding, vacuum
forming and twin shell vacuum forming, that enable
us to meet each customers unique styling and cost
requirements. The breadth of our product offering enables us to
provide a one-stop shop for our customers, who
increasingly require complete cab solutions from a single supply
source. As a result, we believe that we have a substantial
opportunity for further customer penetration through
cross-selling initiatives and by bundling our products to
provide complete system solutions.
End-User Focused Product Innovation. A key trend in the
commercial vehicle market is that OEMs are increasingly focused
on cab design, comfort and features to better serve their end
user, the driver, and our customers are seeking suppliers that
can provide product innovation. We have a full service
engineering and product development organization that
proactively presents solutions to OEMs to meet these needs and
enables us to increase our overall content on current platforms
and models. Examples of our recent innovations that are expected
to result in better cost and performance parameters for our
customers include: a new high performance air suspension seating
system; a back cycler mechanism designed to reduce driver
fatigue; a RoadWatch® system installed in a mirror base to
detect road surface temperature; an aero-molded mirror; and a
low-weight, cost effective tubular wiper system design.
Flexible Manufacturing Capabilities and Cost Competitive
Position. Because commercial vehicle OEMs permit their
customers to select from an extensive menu of cab options, our
customers frequently request modified products in low volumes
within a limited time frame. We have a highly variable cost
structure and can efficiently leverage our flexible
manufacturing capabilities to provide low volume, customized
products to meet each customers styling, cost and
just-in-time delivery requirements. We have a
network of 27 manufacturing and assembly locations worldwide.
Several of our facilities are located near our customers to
reduce distribution costs and to maintain a high level of
customer service and flexibility.
Strong Relationships with Leading Customers and Major
Fleets. Because of our comprehensive product offerings, sole
source position for certain of our products, leading
Class 8 brand names and innovative product features, we
believe we are an important long-term supplier to all of the
leading truck manufacturers in North America and also a global
supplier to leading heavy equipment customers such as
Caterpillar, Oshkosh Truck, Deere & Co., Komatsu and
Volvo. In addition, through our sales force and engineering
teams, we maintain active relationships with the major truck
fleet organizations that are end users of our products such as
Yellow Freight, Swift Transportation, Schneider National and
Ryder Leasing. As a result of our high-quality, innovative
products, well-recognized brand names and customer service, a
majority of the largest 100 fleet operators specifically request
our products.
Significant Barriers to Entry. We are a leader in
providing critical cab assemblies and components to long running
platforms. Considerable barriers to entry exist, including
significant capital investment and engineering requirements,
stringent OEM technical and manufacturing requirements, high
switching costs for OEMs to shift production to new suppliers,
just-in-time delivery requirements to meet OEM volume demand and
strong brand name recognition.
Proven Management Team. Our management team is highly
respected within the commercial vehicle market, and our six
senior executives have an average of 25 years of experience
in the industry. We believe that our team has substantial depth
in critical operational areas and has demonstrated success in
reducing costs, integrating business acquisitions and improving
processes through cyclical periods. In
58
addition, we have added significant management, technical and
operations talent with our recent acquisitions.
Our Business Strategy
In addition to capitalizing on expected growth in our end
markets, our primary growth strategies are as follows:
Increase Content, Expand Customer Penetration and Leverage
System Opportunities. We are the only integrated commercial
vehicle supplier that can offer complete modular cab systems. We
are focused on securing additional sales from our existing
customer base, and we actively cross-market a diverse portfolio
of products to our customers to increase our content on the cabs
manufactured by these OEMs. To complement our North American
capabilities and enhance our customer relationships, we are
working with OEMs as they increase their focus on international
markets. We are one of the first commercial vehicle suppliers to
establish operations in China and are aggressively working to
secure new business from both existing customers with Chinese
manufacturing operations and Chinese OEMs. We believe we are
well positioned to capitalize on the migration by OEMs in the
heavy truck and commercial vehicle sector towards commercial
vehicle suppliers that can offer a complete interior system.
Leverage Our New Product Development Capabilities. We
have made a significant investment in our engineering
capabilities and new product development in order to anticipate
the evolving demands of our customers and end users. For
example, we recently introduced a new wiper system utilizing a
tubular linkage system with a single motor that operates both
wipers, reducing the cost, space and weight of the wiper system.
Also, we believe that our new high performance seat should
enable us to capture additional market share in North America
and provide us with opportunities to market this seat on a
global basis. We will continue to design and develop new
products that add or improve content and increase cab comfort
and safety.
Capitalize on Operating Leverage. We continuously seek
ways to lower costs, enhance product quality, improve
manufacturing efficiencies and increase product throughput. Over
the past three years, we realized operating synergies with the
integration of our sales, marketing and distribution processes;
reduced our fixed cost base through the closure and
consolidation of several manufacturing and design facilities;
and have begun to implement our Lean Manufacturing and Total
Quality Production Systems (TQPS) programs. We
believe our ongoing cost saving initiatives and the
establishment of our sourcing relationships in China will enable
us to continue to lower our manufacturing costs. As a result, we
are well positioned to grow our operating margins and capitalize
on any volume increases in the heavy truck sector with minimal
additional capital expenditures. With the integration of
Mayflower and MWC, CVGs management will be pursuing cost
reduction and avoidance opportunities which include:
consolidating supplier relationships to achieve lower costs and
better terms, combining steel and other material purchases to
leverage purchasing power, strategic sourcing of products to
OEMs from new facility locations, implementing lean
manufacturing techniques to achieve operational efficiencies,
improving product quality and delivery and providing additional
capacity. Cost reductions will also target merging
administrative functions, including accounting, IT and corporate
services.
Grow Sales to the Aftermarket. While commercial vehicles
have a relatively long life, certain components, such as seats,
wipers and mirrors, are replaced more frequently. We believe
that there are opportunities to leverage our brand recognition
to increase our sales to the replacement aftermarket. Since many
aftermarket participants are small and locally focused, we plan
to leverage our national scale to increase our market share in
the fragmented aftermarket. We believe that the continued growth
in the aftermarket represents an attractive diversification to
our OEM business due to its relative stability as well as the
market penetration opportunity.
Pursue Strategic Acquisitions and Continue to Diversify
Sales. We will selectively pursue complementary strategic
acquisitions that allow us to leverage the marketing,
engineering and manufacturing strengths of our business and
expand our sales to new and existing customers. The markets in
which we operate are highly fragmented and provide ample
consolidation opportunities. The acquisition
59
of Mayflower will enable us to be the only supplier worldwide to
offer complete cab systems in sequence, integrating interior
trim and seats with the cab structure. The MWC acquisition will
enable us to provide integrated electronic systems into our cab
products. Each of these acquisitions has expanded and
diversified our sales to include a greater percentage to
non-heavy truck markets, such as the construction and specialty
and military vehicle markets.
Our Recent Acquisitions
On February 7, 2005, we acquired substantially all of the
assets and liabilities related to Mayflower Vehicle
Systems North American Commercial Vehicle Operations for
$107.5 million, which became a wholly owned subsidiary of
CVG. The Mayflower acquisition was funded through an increase
and amendment to our senior credit facility. Mayflower is the
only non-captive producer of complete steel and aluminum truck
cabs for the commercial vehicle sector in North America.
Mayflower serves the North American commercial vehicle sector
from three manufacturing locations, Norwalk, Ohio, Shadyside,
Ohio and Kings Mountain, North Carolina, supplying three major
product lines: cab frames and assemblies, sleeper boxes and
other structural components. Through the Mayflower acquisition
we believe we are the only supplier worldwide with the
capability to offer complete cab systems in sequence,
integrating interior trim and seats with the cab structure. The
acquisition gives us the leading position in North American cab
structures and the number two position in complete cab
assemblies, as well as full service cab and sleeper engineering
and development capabilities with a technical facility located
near Detroit, Michigan. In addition, the Mayflower acquisition
broadens our revenue base at International, Volvo/ Mack,
Freightliner, PACCAR and Caterpillar and enhances our
cross-selling opportunities. We anticipate that the Mayflower
acquisition will also provide significant cost saving
opportunities and our complementary customer bases will balance
revenue distribution and strengthen customer relationships. For
the year ended December 31, 2004, Mayflower recorded
revenues of $206.5 million and operating income of
$21.6 million.
On June 3, 2005, we acquired all of the stock of Monona
Corporation, the parent of MWC, for $55.0 million, and MWC
became a wholly owned subsidiary of CVG. The MWC acquisition was
funded through an increase and amendment to our senior credit
facility. MWC is a leading manufacturer of complex, electronic
wire harnesses and related assemblies used in the global heavy
equipment and specialty and military vehicle markets. It also
produces panel assemblies for commercial equipment markets and
cab frame assemblies for Caterpillar. MWCs wire harness
assemblies are critical, complex products that are the primary
electrical current carrying devices within vehicle systems. MWC
offers approximately 4,500 different wire harness assemblies for
its customers, which include leading OEMs such as Caterpillar,
Deere & Co. and Oshkosh Truck. MWC operates from
primary manufacturing operations in the U.S. and Mexico, and we
believe it is cost competitive on a global basis. The MWC
acquisition enhances our ability to offer comprehensive cab
systems to our customers, expands our electronic assembly
capabilities, adds Mexico manufacturing capabilities, and offers
significant cross-selling opportunities over a more diversified
base of customers. For the fiscal year ended January 31,
2005, MWC recorded revenues of $85.5 million and operating
income of $9.6 million.
Products
We offer OEMs a broad range of products and system solutions for
a variety of end market vehicle applications that include local
and long-haul commercial truck, bus, construction, specialty
automotive, agricultural, military, end market industrial,
marine, municipal and recreation. Fleets and OEMs are increasing
their focus on cabs and their interiors to differentiate
products and improve driver comfort and retention. We
manufacture over 50 product categories, many of which are
critical to the interior subsystems of a commercial vehicle cab.
Although a portion of our products are sold directly to OEMs as
finished components, we use most of our products to produce
systems or subsystems, which are groups
of component parts located throughout the vehicle that operate
together to provide a specific vehicle function. Systems
currently produced by us include cab bodies, sleeper boxes,
seating, trim, body panels, storage cabinets, floor covering,
mirrors, windshield wipers, headliners, window lifts, door
locks, temperature measurement and wire harnesses. We classify
our products into five general categories:
60
(1) seats and seating systems, (2) trim systems and
components, (3) mirrors, wipers and controls, (4) cab
structures, sleeper boxes, body panels and structural components
and (5) electronic wire harnesses and panel assemblies.
The following table shows the percentage of sales from our
principal product categories in 2004 on an actual and pro forma
basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Sales | |
|
|
| |
Product Category |
|
Actual | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Seats and Seating Systems
|
|
|
53 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
Trim Systems and Components
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Mirrors, Wipers and Controls
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Cab Structures, Sleeper Boxes, Body Panels and Structural
Components
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
Electronic Wire Harnesses and Panel Assemblies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Set forth below is a brief description of our products and their
applications:
Seats and Seating Systems.
We design, engineer and produce seating systems primarily for
heavy trucks in North America and for commercial vehicles used
in the construction and agricultural industries through our
European operations. For the most part, our seats and seating
systems are fully-assembled and ready for installation when they
are delivered to the OEM. We offer a wide range of seats that
include air suspension seats, static seats, passenger seats, bus
seats and rail car seats. As a result of our strong product
design and product technology, we are a leader in designing
seats with convenience features and enhanced safety. Seats and
seating systems are the most complex and highly specialized
products of our five product categories.
Heavy Truck Seats. We produce seats and seating systems
for Class 8 heavy trucks in our North American operations.
Our heavy truck seating systems are designed to achieve maximum
driver comfort by adding a wide range of manual and power
features such as lumbar supports, cushion and back bolsters and
leg and thigh supports. Our heavy truck seats are highly
specialized based on a variety of different seating options
offered in OEM product lines. Our seats are built to customer
specifications in low volumes and consequently are produced in
numerous combinations with a wide range of price points. There
are approximately 350 parts in each seat, resulting in over
2 million possible seat combinations. Adding features to a
standard seat is the principal way to increase pricing, and the
price of one seat can range from $180 for a standard suspension
seat to over $400 for an air seat with enhanced features.
We differentiate our seats from our competitors seats by
focusing on three principal goals: driver comfort, driver
retention and decreased workers compensation claims.
Drivers of heavy trucks recognize and are often given the
opportunity to specify their choice of seat brands, and we
strive to develop strong customer loyalty both at the commercial
vehicle OEMs and among the drivers. We believe that we have
superior technology and can offer a unique seat base that is
ergonomically designed, accommodates a range of driver sizes and
absorbs shock to maximize driver comfort. We recently introduced
the Back Cycler seat mechanism to reduce driver
fatigue and a new high performance air suspension seat system.
Other Commercial Vehicle Seats. We produce seats and
seating systems for commercial vehicles used in the global
construction and agricultural, bus, commercial transport and
municipal industries. The principal focus of these seating
systems is durability. These seats are ergonomically designed
for difficult working environments, to provide comfort and
control throughout the range of seats and chairs.
Other Seating Products. Our European operations also
manufacture office seating products. Our office chair was
developed as a result of our experience supplying chairs for the
heavy truck, agricultural and construction industries and is
fully adjustable to maximize comfort at work. Our office chairs
are
61
available in a wide variety of colors and fabrics to suit many
different office environments, such as emergency services, call
centers, receptions, studios, boardrooms and general office.
Trim Systems and Components.
We design, engineer, and produce trim systems and components for
the interior cabs of commercial vehicles. Our interior trim
products are designed to provide a comfortable interior for the
vehicle occupants as well as a variety of functional and safety
features. The wide variety of features that can be selected by
the heavy truck customer makes trim systems and components a
complex and highly specialized product category. For example, a
sleeper cab can contain three times as many trim components as a
day cab, and can cost, on average, over $900 for a fully loaded
sleeper cab as compared to $260 for an average day cab. Set
forth below is a brief description of our principal trim systems
and components:
Trim Products. Our trim products include A-Pillars,
B-Pillars, door panels and interior trim panels. Door panels
consist of several component parts that are attached to a
substrate. Specific components include vinyl or cloth-covered
appliqués, armrests, radio speaker grilles, map pocket
compartments, carpet and sound-reducing insulation. In addition,
door panels often incorporate electronic and electrical
distribution systems and products, including lock and latch,
window glass, window regulators and audio systems as well as
wire harnesses for the control of power seats, windows, mirrors
and door locks. Our products are attractive, lightweight
solutions from a traditional cut and sew approach to a
contemporary molded styling theme. The parts can be
color matched or top good wrapped to integrate seamlessly with
the rest of the interior. We recently developed a one-step
twin shell vacuum forming process for flooring
systems and headliners.
Instrument Panels. We produce and assemble instrument
panels that can be integrated with the rest of the interior
trim. The instrument panel is a complex system of coverings and
foam, plastic and metal parts designed to house various
components and act as a safety device for the vehicle occupant.
Body Panels (Headliners/ Wall Panels). Headliners consist
of a substrate and a finished interior layer made of fabrics and
materials. While headliners are an important contributor to
interior aesthetics, they also provide insulation from road
noise and can serve as carriers for a variety of other
components, such as visors, overhead consoles, grab handles,
coat hooks, electrical wiring, speakers, lighting and other
electronic and electrical products. As the amount of electronic
and electrical content available in vehicles has increased,
headliners have emerged as an important carrier of electronic
features such as lighting systems.
Storage Systems. Our modular storage units and custom
cabinetry are designed to improve comfort and convenience for
the driver. These storage systems are designed to be integrated
with the interior trim. These units may be easily expanded and
customized with features that include refrigerators, sinks and
water reservoirs. Our storage systems are constructed with
durable materials and designed to last the life of the vehicle.
Floor Covering Systems. We have an extensive and
comprehensive portfolio of floor covering systems and dash
insulators. Carpet flooring systems generally consist of tufted
or non-woven carpet with a thermoplastic backcoating which, when
heated, allows the carpet to be fitted precisely to the interior
or trunk compartment of the vehicle. Additional insulation
materials are added to minimize noise, vibration and harshness.
Non-carpeted flooring systems, used primarily in commercial and
fleet vehicles, offer improved wear and maintenance
characteristics. The dash insulator separates the passenger
compartment from the engine compartment and prevents engine
noise and heat from entering the passenger compartment.
Sleeper Bunks. We offer a wide array of design choices
for upper and lower sleeper bunks for heavy trucks. All parts of
our sleeper bunks can be integrated to match the rest of the
interior trim. Our sleeper bunks arrive at OEMs fully assembled
and ready for installation.
Grab Handles and Armrests. Our grab handles and armrests
are designed and engineered with specific attention to
aesthetics, ergonomics and strength. Our
T-Skintm
product uses a wide range of inserts
62
and substrates for structural integrity. The integral skin
urethane offers a soft touch and can be in-mold coated to
specific colors.
Bumper Fascias and Fender Covers. Our highly durable,
lightweight bumper fascias and fender covers are capable of
withstanding repeated impacts that would deform an aluminum or
steel bumper. We utilize a production technique that chemically
bonds a layer of paint to the part after it has been molded,
thereby enabling the part to keep its appearance even after
repeated impacts.
Privacy Curtains. We produce privacy curtains for use in
sleeper cabs. Our privacy curtains include features such as
integrated color matching of both sides of the curtain, choice
of cloth or vinyl, full black out features and
low-weight.
Sun Visors. Our sun visors are fully integrated for multi
access mounting and pivot hardware. Our sun visor system
includes multiple options such as mirrors, map pockets and
different options for positioning. We use low pressure injection
molding to produce our premium sun visors with a simulated grain
texture.
Mirrors, Wipers and Controls.
We design, engineer and produce a wide range of mirrors, wipers
and controls used in commercial vehicles. Set forth below is a
brief description of our principal products in this category:
Mirrors. We offer a wide range of round, rectangular,
motorized and heated mirrors and related hardware, including
brackets, braces and side bars. Most of our mirror designs
utilize stainless steel pins, fasteners and support braces to
ensure durability. We have recently introduced both road and
outside temperature devices that are integrated into the mirror
face or the vehicles dashboard through our Road
Watchtm
family of products. These systems are principally utilized by
municipalities throughout North America to monitor surface
temperatures and assist them in dispersing chemicals for snow
and ice removal. We have recently introduced a new lower-cost
system for use in long-haul commercial trucks and mission
critical vehicles such as ambulances. We have also recently
introduced a new molded aerodynamic mirror that is integrated
into the trucks exterior.
Windshield Wiper Systems. We offer application-specific
windshield wiper systems and individual windshield wiper
components for all segments of the commercial vehicle market.
Our windshield wiper systems are generally delivered to the OEM
fully assembled and ready for installation. A windshield wiper
system is typically comprised of a pneumatic electric motor,
linkages, arms, wiper blades, washer reservoirs and related
pneumatic or electric pumps. We also produce air-assisted
washing systems for headlights and cameras to assist drivers
with visibility for safe vehicle operation. These systems
utilize window wash fluid and air to create a turbulent
liquid/air stream that removes road grime from headlights and
cameras. We offer an optional programmable washing system that
allows for periodic washing and dry cycles for maximum safety.
We have recently introduced a new low-weight, cost effective
tubular wiper system design.
Controls. We offer a range of controls and control
systems that includes a complete line of window lifts and door
locks, mechanic, pneumatic, electrical and electronic HVAC
controls and electric switch products. We specialize in
air-powered window lifts and door locks, which are highly
reliable and cost effective as compared to similar products
powered by electricity. We also offer a variety of electric
window lifts and door locks.
Cab Structures, Sleeper Boxes, Body Panels and Structural
Components.
We design, engineer and produce complete cab structures, sleeper
boxes, body panels and structural components for the commercial
vehicle and automotive industries in North America. Set forth
below is a description of our principal products in this
category:
Cab Structures. We design, manufacture, and assemble
complete cab structures used primarily in heavy trucks for all
the commercial vehicle OEMs in North America. Our cab
structures, which are
63
manufactured from both steel and aluminum are delivered to our
customers, fully assembled and primed for paint. Our cab
structures are built to order based upon options selected by the
vehicles end-users and delivered to the OEMs, in line
sequence, as these end-users trucks are manufactured by
the OEMs. In addition, we also design, produce and assemble cab
structures for certain automotive OEMs.
Sleeper Boxes. We design, manufacture, and assemble
sleeper boxes primarily for heavy trucks in North America. We
manufacture both integrated sleeper boxes that are part of the
overall cab structure as well as stand alone assemblies
depending on the customer application. Sleeper boxes are
typically constructed using aluminum exterior panels in
combination with steel structural components delivered to our
customers in line sequence after the final seal and E-coat
process. We build and deliver our sleeper boxes to our OEM
customers in sequence.
Body Panels and Structural Components. We produce a wide
range of both steel and aluminum large exterior body panels and
structural components. Approximately 80% of the body panels and
structural components we manufacture are used internally in our
production of cab structures as described above, with the
remaining approximately 20% being sold externally to commercial
vehicle and automotive OEMs. The products we produce for the
external market include large exterior body panels and
structural components for both heavy trucks and the Ford GT
automobile, heavy truck bumper assemblies and large stampings
for the construction industry.
Electronic Wire Harnesses and Panel Assemblies. We
design, engineer and produce a wide range of electronic wire
harnesses and related assemblies as well as panel assemblies
used in commercial vehicles and other equipment. Set forth below
is a brief description of our principal products in this
category.
Electronic Wire Harnesses. We offer a broad range of
complex electronic wire harness assemblies that function as the
primary current carrying devices used to provide electrical
interconnections for gauges, lights, control functions, power
circuits and other electronic applications on a commercial
vehicle or related unit of equipment. Our wire harnesses are
highly customized to fit specific end-user requirements and
often include more than 350 individual circuits and weigh more
than 30 pounds. We provide our wire harnesses for a wide variety
of commercial vehicles, military vehicles, specialty trucks and
other specialty applications, including heavy-industrial
equipment and medical equipment.
Panel Assemblies. We assemble large, integrated
components such as panel assemblies and cabinets for commercial
vehicle OEMs, other heavy equipment manufacturers and medical
equipment manufacturers. The panels and cabinets we assemble are
installed in key locations on a vehicle or unit of equipment,
are integrated with our wire harness assemblies and provide user
control over certain operational functions and features.
Customers and Marketing
We sell our products principally to the commercial vehicle OEM
market. Approximately 75% of our 2004 sales and approximately
78% of our pro forma 2004 sales were derived from sales to
commercial vehicle OEMs, with the remainder derived principally
from aftermarket sales.
64
We supply our products primarily to heavy truck OEMs, the
aftermarket and OEM service segment and other commercial vehicle
OEMs. The following is a summary of our sales by end-user market
segment in 2004 on an actual and pro forma basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Sales | |
|
|
| |
End-User Market |
|
Actual | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Heavy Truck OEM
|
|
|
54 |
% |
|
|
59 |
% |
Aftermarket and OEM Service
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Construction
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Bus
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Military
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Agriculture
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Other
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our principal customers in the heavy truck OEM market include
PACCAR, Freightliner, International and Volvo/ Mack. We believe
we are an important long-term supplier to all leading truck
manufacturers in North America because of our comprehensive
product offerings, leading brand names and product innovation.
In our European operations, our principal customers in the
commercial vehicle market include Caterpillar, Volvo,
Deere & Co., Komatsu and CNH Global (Case New Holland).
We also sell our trim products to OEMs in the marine and
recreational vehicle industries and seating products to office
product manufacturers principally in Europe.
The following is a summary of our significant OEM customers in
2004 on an actual and pro forma basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Sales | |
|
|
| |
Customer |
|
Actual | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
PACCAR
|
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
Freightliner
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
International
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Caterpillar
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Volvo/ Mack
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Komatsu
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Deere & Co.
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Oshkosh Truck
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Other
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Except as set forth in the above table, no other customer
accounted for more than 10% of our revenues in 2004.
Primarily as a result of our European operations, we derived
approximately 28% of our actual 2004 sales and 16% of our pro
forma 2004 sales from outside of North America. Our European
operations currently serve customers located in Europe and Asia.
Our OEM customers generally source business to us pursuant to
written contracts, purchase orders or other firm commitments in
terms of price, quality, technology and delivery. Awarded
business generally covers the supply of all or a portion of a
customers production and service requirements for a
particular product program rather than the supply of a specific
quantity of products. In general, these contracts, purchase
orders and commitments provide that the customer can terminate
the contract, purchase order or
65
commitment if we do not meet specified quality and delivery
requirements. Such contracts, purchase orders or other firm
commitments generally extend for the entire life of a platform,
which is typically five to seven years. Although these
contracts, purchase orders or other commitments may be
terminated at any time by our customers (but not by us), such
terminations have been minimal and have not had a material
impact on our results of operations. In order to reduce our
reliance on any one vehicle model, we produce products for a
broad cross-section of both new and more established models.
Our contracts with our major OEM customers generally provide for
an annual productivity cost reduction. These reductions are
calculated on an annual basis as a percentage of the previous
years purchases by each customer. The reduction is
achieved through engineering changes, material cost reductions,
logistics savings, reductions in packaging cost and labor
efficiencies. Historically, most of these cost reductions have
been offset by both internal reductions and through the
assistance of our supply base, although no assurances can be
given that we will be able to achieve such reductions in the
future. If the annual reduction targets are not achieved then
the difference is recovered through price reductions. Our cost
structure is comprised of a high percentage of variable costs
that provides us with additional flexibility during economic
cycles.
Our sales and marketing efforts with respect to our OEM sales
are designed to create overall awareness of our engineering
design and manufacturing capabilities and to enable us to be
selected to supply products for new and redesigned models by our
OEM customers. Our sales and marketing staff works closely with
our design and engineering personnel to prepare the materials
used for bidding on new business as well as to provide a
consistent interface between us and our key customers. Most of
our sales and marketing personnel have engineering backgrounds
which enable them to participate in the design and engineering
aspects of acquiring new business as well as ongoing customer
service. We currently have sales and marketing personnel located
in every major region in which we operate. From time to time, we
also participate in industry trade shows and advertise in
industry publications. One of our ongoing initiatives is to
negotiate and enter into long term supply agreements with our
existing customers that allow us to leverage all of our business
and provide a complete cab system to our commercial vehicle OEM
customers.
Our principal customers for our aftermarket sales include the
OEM dealers and independent wholesale distributors. Our sales
and marketing efforts for our aftermarket sales are focused on
support of these two distribution chains, as well as direct
contact with all major fleets.
Design and Engineering Support
We work with our customers engineering and development
teams at the beginning of the design process for new components
and assemblies, or the redesign process for existing components
and assemblies, in order to maximize production efficiency and
quality. These processes may take place from one to three years
prior to the commencement of production. On average, development
of a new component takes 12 to 24 months during the design
phase, while the re-engineering of an existing part may take
from one to six months. Early design involvement can result in a
product that meets or exceeds the customers design and
performance requirements and is more efficient to manufacture.
In addition, our extensive involvement enhances our position for
bidding on such business. We work aggressively to ensure that
our quality and delivery metrics distinguish us from our
competitors.
We focus on bringing our customers integrated products that have
superior content, comfort and safety. Consistent with our
value-added engineering focus, we have developed relationships
with the engineering departments of our customers and have
placed resident engineers with PACCAR and Freightliner, two of
our largest customers. These relationships not only help us to
identify new business opportunities but also enable us to
compete based on the quality of our products and services,
rather than exclusively on price. In addition, we have also
provided engineering solutions for certain specialty vehicles
including, most recently, the body development for the
prestigious Ford GT sports car.
We are currently involved in the design stage of several
products for our customers and will begin production of these
products in the years 2005 to 2007.
66
Intellectual Property
We consider ourselves to be a leader in both product and process
technology, and, therefore, protection of intellectual property
is important to our business. Our principal intellectual
property consists of product and process technology, a limited
number of United States and foreign patents, trade secrets,
trademarks and copyrights. Although our intellectual property is
important to our business operations and in the aggregate
constitutes a valuable asset, we do not believe that any single
patent, trade secret, trademark or copyright, or group of
patents, trade secrets, trademarks or copyrights is critical to
the success of our business. Our policy is to seek statutory
protection for all significant intellectual property embodied in
patents, trademarks and copyrights. From time to time, we grant
licenses under our patents and technology and receive licenses
under patents and technology of others.
We market our products under well-known brand names that include
KAB Seating, National Seating, Trim Systems, Sprague Devices,
Sprague Controls,
Prutsmantm,
Moto
Mirrortm,
RoadWatch® and
Mayflowertm.
We believe that our brands are valuable and are increasing in
value with the growth of our business, but that our business is
not dependent on such brands. We own U.S. federal
registrations for several of our brands.
Research and Development
Our objective is to be a leader in offering superior quality and
technologically advanced products to our customers at
competitive prices. We engage in ongoing engineering, research
and development activities to improve the reliability,
performance and cost-effectiveness of our existing products and
to design and develop new products for existing and new
applications. The Mayflower acquisition has significantly
expanded our capabilities in this regard by adding another
design facility and prototype shop in Farmington Hills, Michigan
and increasing the size of our design and engineering team.
Manufacturing
A description of the manufacturing processes we utilize for each
of our principal product categories is set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
Seats and Seating Systems. Our seating operations utilize
a variety of manufacturing techniques whereby fabric is affixed
to an underlying seat frame. We also manufacture and assemble
the seat frame, which involves complex welding. For the most
part, we utilize outside suppliers to produce the individual
components used to assemble the seat frame. |
|
|
|
Trim Systems and Components. Our interior systems process
capabilities include injection molding, low-pressure injection
molding, urethane molding and foaming processes, compression
molding, and vacuum and twin shell vacuum forming as well as
various trimming and finishing methods. |
|
|
|
Mirrors, Wipers and Controls. We manufacture our mirrors,
wipers and controls utilizing a variety of manufacturing
processes and techniques. Our mirrors, wipers and controls are
100% hand assembled, tested and packaged. |
|
|
|
Cab Structures, Sleeper Boxes, Body Panels and Structural
Components. We utilize a wide range of manufacturing
processes to produce the majority of the steel and aluminum
stampings used in our cab structures, sleeper boxes, body panels
and structural components and a variety of both robotic and
manual welding techniques in the assembly of these products. In
addition, both our Norwalk, Ohio and Kings Mountain, North
Carolina facilities have large capacity, fully automated E-coat
paint priming systems allowing us to provide our customers with
a paint-ready cab product. Due to their high cost, full body
E-coat systems, such as ours, are rarely found outside of the
manufacturing operations of the major OEMs. The four major large
press lines at our Shadyside, Ohio facility provide us with the
in-house manufacturing flexibility for both aluminum and steel
stampings delivered just in time to our cab assembly plants.
This plant also provides us with low |
67
|
|
|
|
|
volume forming and processing techniques including laser trim
operations that minimize investment and time to manufacture for
low volume applications. |
|
|
|
Electronic Wire Harnesses and Panel Assemblies. We
utilize several manufacturing techniques to produce the majority
of our electronic wire harnesses and panel assemblies. Our
processes, both manual and automated, are designed to produce
complex, low- to medium-volume wire harnesses and panel
assemblies in short time frames. Our wire harnesses and panel
assemblies are both electronically and hand tested. |
We have a broad array of processes to offer our commercial
vehicle OEM customers to enable us to meet their styling and
cost requirements. The interior of the vehicle cab is the most
significant and appealing aspect to the driver of the vehicle,
and consequently each commercial vehicle OEM has unique
requirements as to feel, appearance and features. Within the
last several years, we added new technologies, including
injection molding, compression molding and vacuum forming
capabilities, to our facilities through research and
development, licenses of patented technology and equipment
purchases.
The end markets for our products are highly specialized and our
customers frequently request modified products in low volumes
within an expedited delivery timeframe. As a result, we
primarily utilize flexible manufacturing cells at the vast
majority of our production facilities. Manufacturing cells are
clusters of individual manufacturing operations and work
stations grouped in a circular configuration, with the operators
placed centrally within the configuration. This provides
flexibility by allowing efficient changes to the number of
operations each operator performs. When compared to the more
traditional, less flexible assembly line process, cell
manufacturing allows us to maintain our product output
consistent with our OEM customers requirements and reduce
the level of inventory. While the Norwalk and Shadyside, Ohio
and Kings Mountain, North Carolina manufacturing facilities we
recently acquired as part of the Mayflower acquisition do
utilize an assembly line model, we believe we can adapt these
operations to accommodate product changes and limit future
capital expenditures.
When an end-user buys a commercial vehicle, the end-user will
specify the seat and other features for that vehicle. Because
each of our seating systems is unique, our manufacturing
facilities have significant complexity which we manage by
building in sequence. We build our seating systems as orders are
received, and systems are delivered to the customers rack
in the sequence that the vehicles come down the assembly line.
We have systems in place that allow us to provide complete
customized interior kits in boxes that are delivered in
sequence, and we intend to expand upon these systems such that
we will be able to provide, in sequence, fully integrated
modular systems combining the cab body and interior and seating
systems.
In most instances, we keep track of our build sequence by
vehicle identification number, and components are identified by
bar code. Sequencing reduces our cost of production because it
eliminates warehousing costs and reduces waste and obsolescence,
offsetting any increased labor costs. Several of our
manufacturing facilities are strategically located near our
customers assembly plants, which facilitates this process
and minimizes shipping costs.
We employ just-in-time manufacturing and system sourcing in our
operations to meet customer requirements for faster deliveries
and to minimize our need to carry significant inventory levels.
We utilize visual material systems to manage inventory levels,
and in certain locations we have inventory delivered as often as
two times per day from a nearby facility based on the previous
days order. This eliminates the need to carry excess
inventory at our facilities.
Typically, in a strong economy, new vehicle production increases
and there is more money to be spent on enhancements to the truck
interior. As demand goes up, the mix of our products shifts
towards more expensive systems, such as sleeper units, with
enhanced features and higher quality materials. The shift from
low-end units to high-end units amplifies the positive effect a
strong economy has on our business. Conversely, when the market
drops and customers shift away from ordering high-end units with
enhanced features, our business suffers from both lower volume
and lower pricing. We strive to manage down cycles by running
our facilities at capacity while maintaining the capability and
flexibility to expand. We work
68
with our employees and rely on their involvement to help
eliminate problems and re-align our capacity. During a ramp-up
of production, we have plans in place to manage increased demand
and achieve on-time delivery. Our strategies include alternating
between human and machine production and allowing existing
employees to try higher skilled positions while hiring new
employees for lower skilled positions.
During 2002, as a means to enhance our operations, we began to
implement TQPS throughout our operations. TQPS is our customized
version of Lean Manufacturing and consists of a 32 hour
interactive class that is taught exclusively by members of our
management team. While we are in the beginning phases of TQPS
initiatives, a significant portion of the labor efficiencies we
gained over the past few years is due to the program. TQPS is an
analytical process in which we analyze each of our manufacturing
cells and identify the most efficient process to improve
efficiency and quality. The goal is to achieve total cost
management and continuous improvement. Some examples of
TQPS-related improvements are: reduced labor to move parts
around the facility, clear walking paths in and around
manufacturing cells and increased safety. An ongoing goal is to
reduce the time employees spend waiting for materials within a
facility. We intend to implement TQPS improvements at each of
the manufacturing facilities we recently acquired as part of the
Mayflower acquisition and the MWC acquisition and anticipate
that this will increase operational efficiency, improve product
quality and provide additional capacity at these locations.
Raw Materials and Suppliers
A description of the principal raw materials we utilize for each
of our principal product categories is set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
Seats and Seating Systems. The principal raw materials
used in our seat systems include steel, aluminum and foam
chemicals, and are generally readily available and obtained from
multiple suppliers under various supply agreements. Leather,
fabric and certain components are also purchased from multiple
suppliers under supply agreements. Typically, our supply
agreements last for at least one year and can be terminated by
us for breach or convenience. Some purchased components are
obtained from our customers. |
|
|
|
Trim Systems and Components. The principal raw materials
used in our interior systems processes are resin and chemical
products, which are formed and assembled into end products.
These raw materials are obtained from multiple suppliers,
typically under supply agreements which last for at least one
year and are terminable by us for breach or convenience. |
|
|
|
Mirrors, Wipers and Controls. The principal raw materials
used to manufacture our mirrors, wipers and controls are steel,
stainless steel, aluminum, glass and rubber, which are generally
readily available and obtained from multiple suppliers. |
|
|
|
Cab Structures, Sleeper Boxes, Body Panels and Structural
Components. The principal raw materials used in our cab
structures, sleeper boxes, body panels and structural components
are steel and aluminum, the majority of which we purchase in
sheets and stamp at our Shadyside, Ohio facility. These raw
materials are generally readily available and obtained from
several suppliers, typically under purchase orders that are
cancelable by us without cause, pursuant to one year supply
agreements. |
|
|
|
Electronic Wire Harnesses and Panel Assemblies. The
principal raw materials used to manufacture our electronic wire
harnesses are wire, connectors, terminals, switches, relays and
braid fabric. These raw materials are obtained from multiple
suppliers and are generally readily available. Many of our
customers specify particular wire and connectors and, as such,
negotiate pricing of these materials directly with our
customers. Our panel assembly materials are generally procured
directly from the customer. |
Our supply agreements generally provide for fixed pricing but do
not require us to purchase any specified quantities. We have not
experienced any significant shortages of raw materials and
normally do not carry inventories of raw materials or finished
products in excess of those reasonably required to meet
production and shipping schedules as well as service
requirements. We purchase materials such as steel,
69
foam, vinyl and cloth in large quantities on a global basis
through our central corporate office, and other materials for
which we require lower volumes are purchased directly by our
facilities. We purchase steel at market prices, which during the
last year, have increased to historical highs as a result of a
relatively low level of supply and a relatively high level of
demand. As a result, we are currently being assessed surcharges
on certain of our purchases of steel. We continue to work with
our customers and suppliers to minimize the impact of such
surcharges. We intend to exploit the increased purchasing power
we have gained through the Mayflower acquisition to obtain
purchase price reductions on certain raw materials, such as
steel and aluminum. We do not believe we are dependent on a
single supplier or limited group of suppliers for our raw
materials.
Competition
Within each of our principal product categories, we compete with
a variety of independent suppliers and with OEMs in-house
operations, primarily on the basis of price, breadth of product
offerings, product quality, technical expertise and development
capability, product delivery and product service. We believe we
are the only supplier in the North American commercial vehicle
market that can offer complete cab systems in sequence
integrating interior systems (including seats, interior trim and
flooring systems) with the cab structure. A summary of our
estimated market position and primary independent competitors is
set forth below.
|
|
|
|
|
Seats and Seating Systems. We believe that we have the
number one market position in North America with respect to our
seating operations. We also believe that we have the number one
market position in supplying seats and seating systems to
commercial vehicles used in the construction industry on a
worldwide basis. Our primary independent competitors in the
North American commercial vehicle market include Sears
Manufacturing Company, Accuride Corporation and Seats, Inc., and
our primary competitors in the European commercial vehicle
market include Grammar and Isringhausen. |
|
|
|
Trim Systems and Components. We believe that we have the
number one market position in North America with respect to our
interior trim products. We face competition from a number of
different competitors with respect to each of our trim system
products and components. Overall, our primary independent
competitors are ConMet, Fabriform, TPI, Findlay, Superior and
Mitras. |
|
|
|
Mirrors, Wipers and Controls. We believe that we hold the
number two market position in North America with respect to our
windshield wiper systems and mirrors. We face competition from a
number of different competitors with respect to each of our
principal products in this category. Our principal competitors
for mirrors are Hadley, Lang-Mekra and Trucklite, and our
principal competitors for windshield wiper systems are Johnson
Electric, Trico and Valeo. |
|
|
|
Cab Structures, Sleeper Boxes, Body Panels and Structural
Components. We believe we have the number one market
position in North America with respect to our cab structural
components and the number two position in North America with
respect to our cab structures, sleeper boxes and body panels.
Our principal competitors with regard to structural components
are Magna Inoxydable Inc., Ogihara Corporation, Q3 Stamped
Metal, Inc. and Defiance Metal Products. Our principal
competitors with regard to cab structures are the in-house
operations of Freightliner, PACCAR, International and Volvo/
Mack. |
|
|
|
Electronic Wire Harnesses and Panel Assemblies. We
believe that we are a leading producer of low- to medium-volume
complex, electronic wire harnesses and related assemblies used
in the global heavy equipment, commercial vehicle, heavy-truck
and specialty and military vehicle markets. Our principal
competitors for electronic wire harnesses include large
diversified suppliers such as Delphi, Lear, Leoni and Stoneridge
and smaller independent companies such as Fargo Assembly,
Schofield Enterprises and Unlimited Services. |
70
Seasonality
OEMs production requirements are generally higher in the
first three quarters of the year as compared to the fourth
quarter. We believe this seasonality is due, in part, to demand
for new vehicles softening during the holiday season and as a
result of the winter months in North America and Europe. Also,
the major North American OEM manufacturers generally close their
production facilities for the last two weeks of the year.
Employees
As of December 31, 2004 we had approximately 2,700
permanent and temporary employees, of whom approximately 16%
were salaried and the balance were hourly. While none of the
hourly employees in our North American operations were
unionized, approximately 43% of our employees at our United
Kingdom operations were represented by shop steward committees.
As a result of the Mayflower acquisition, our number of
employees has increased to approximately 3,700, of whom
approximately 16% are salaried and the balance are hourly. In
addition, we have unionized work forces at each of our newly
acquired Norwalk, Ohio and Shadyside, Ohio facilities
(representing 87% and 74% of their work forces, respectively).
Although, we have no operating history with these work forces or
prior relationship with the unions which represent them,
Mayflower has not experienced any material strikes, lockouts or
work stoppages at these facilities in the last three years.
As the result of the MWC acquisition, our number of employees
increased to approximately 5,500, of whom approximately 12% are
salaried and the balance are hourly. With the MWC acquisition,
we added approximately 1,300 employees in a Mexico facility, who
are unionized under the Confederación de Trabajadores de
Mexico union in Mexico. Although we have no operating
history with this work force or prior relationship with the
union that represents them, MWC has not experienced any material
strikes, lockouts or work stoppages at these facilities in the
last three years. The remainder of employees added with the MWC
acquisition are not unionized. Overall we consider our
relationship with our employees to be satisfactory.
Backlog
We do not generally obtain long-term, firm purchase orders from
our customers. Rather, our customers typically place annual
blanket purchase orders, but these orders do not obligate them
to purchase any specific or minimum amount of products from us
until a release is issued by the customer under the blanket
purchase order. Releases are typically placed within 30 to
90 days of required delivery and may be canceled at any
time, in which case the customer would be liable for work in
process and finished goods. We do not believe that our backlog
of expected product sales covered by firm purchase orders is a
meaningful indicator of future sales since orders may be
rescheduled or canceled.
Properties
Our corporate office is located in New Albany, Ohio. Several of
our manufacturing facilities are located near our OEM customers
to reduce our distribution costs, reduce risk of interruptions
in our delivery schedule, further improve customer service and
provide our customers with reliable delivery of stock and custom
requirements even under condensed time constraints. The
following table provides selected information regarding our
principal facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate | |
|
|
Location |
|
Products Produced |
|
Square Footage | |
|
Ownership Interest | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Norwalk, Ohio(1)
|
|
Cab, Sleeper Box, Interior Trim Assembly and Ford GT Assembly |
|
|
303,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
Vonore, Tennessee (2 facilities)
|
|
Seats, Mirrors |
|
|
245,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Owned/Leased |
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate | |
|
|
Location |
|
Products Produced |
|
Square Footage | |
|
Ownership Interest | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Shadyside, Ohio(1)
|
|
Stamping of Steel and Aluminum Structural and Exposed Stamped
Components |
|
|
225,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
Northampton, England
|
|
Seats (office and commercial vehicle) |
|
|
210,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Kings Mountain, North Carolina(1)
|
|
Cab, Sleeper Box, Interior Trim Assembly |
|
|
180,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
Statesville, North Carolina (2 facilities)
|
|
Interior Trim, Seats |
|
|
163,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Seattle, Washington
|
|
RIM Process, Interior Trim, Seats |
|
|
156,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
Michigan City, Indiana
|
|
Wipers, Switches |
|
|
87,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Dublin, Virginia
|
|
Interior Trim, Seats |
|
|
79,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
Denton, Texas(3)
|
|
Interior Trim, Seats |
|
|
69,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Vancouver, Washington (2 facilities)
|
|
Interior Trim |
|
|
63,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Chillicothe, Ohio
|
|
Interior Trim, Dash Assembly |
|
|
62,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
Shanghai, China
|
|
Seats |
|
|
50,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Bellaire, Ohio(1)
|
|
Warehouse Facility |
|
|
40,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Norwalk, Ohio(1)
|
|
Warehouse Facility |
|
|
34,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
New Albany, Ohio
|
|
Corporate Headquarters |
|
|
8,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Tacoma, Washington
|
|
Injection Molding |
|
|
25,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Plain City, Ohio
|
|
R&D, Lab |
|
|
8,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Seneffs (Brussels), Belgium
|
|
Seat Assembly |
|
|
35,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Brisbane (HQ), Australia
|
|
Seat Assembly |
|
|
50,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Farmington Hills, Michigan(1)
|
|
R&D, Lab |
|
|
25,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Sodentalje (Stockholm), Sweden
|
|
Seat Assembly |
|
|
12,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Dublin, Ohio
|
|
Administration |
|
|
14,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Naperville, Illinois(2)
|
|
Administration |
|
|
2,550 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Agua Prieta, Mexico (3 facilities)(2)
|
|
Wire Harness Assembly |
|
|
116,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Douglas, Arizona(2)
|
|
Warehouse Facility |
|
|
11,700 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Monona, Iowa(2)
|
|
Wire Harness/ Panel Assembly |
|
|
62,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
Edgewood, Iowa(2)
|
|
Wire Harness/ Assembly |
|
|
18,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Spring Green, Wisconsin(2)
|
|
Wire Harness/ Panel Assembly |
|
|
38,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Livingston, Wisconsin(2)
|
|
Wire Harness/ Panel Assembly |
|
|
22,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Redgranite, Wisconsin(2)
|
|
Wire Harness Engineering Support |
|
|
2,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Dekalb, Illinois(2)
|
|
Cab Assembly |
|
|
60,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
|
|
(1) |
This facility or lease was acquired through the Mayflower
acquisition as described herein. |
|
(2) |
This facility or lease was acquired through the MWC acquisition
as described herein. |
|
(3) |
This facility is currently dormant. |
72
We also have leased sales and service offices located in
Australia and France.
Utilization of our facilities varies with North American and
European commercial vehicle production and general economic
conditions in such regions. All locations are principally used
for manufacturing, except for our New Albany and Dublin, Ohio
and Naperville, Illinois corporate and administrative offices,
our Plain City, Ohio, Farmington Hills, Michigan and Redgranite,
Wisconsin research, development and engineering facilities and
our leased warehouse facilities in Douglas, Arizona and Bellaire
and Norwalk, Ohio.
Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we are involved in various disputes and
litigation matters that arise in the ordinary course of
business. We do not have any material litigation at this time.
Environmental Matters
We are subject to foreign, federal, state, and local laws and
regulations governing the protection of the environment and
occupational health and safety, including laws regulating air
emissions, wastewater discharges, the generation, storage,
handling, use and transportation of hazardous materials; the
emission and discharge of hazardous materials into the soil,
ground or air; and the health and safety of our colleagues. We
are also required to obtain permits from governmental
authorities for certain of our operations. Although we strive to
comply with all applicable environmental, health, and safety
requirements, we cannot assure you that we are, or have been, in
complete compliance with such requirements. If we violate or
fail to comply with environmental laws, regulations or permits,
we could be fined or otherwise sanctioned by regulators. In some
instances, such a fine or sanction could have a material adverse
effect on us.
Several of our facilities are either certified as, or are in the
process of being certified as, ISO 14000 (the international
environmental management standard) compliant or are developing
similar environmental management systems. Although we have made,
and will continue to make, capital expenditures to implement
such environmental programs and comply with environmental
requirements, we do not expect to make material capital
expenditures for environmental controls in 2005 or 2006. The
environmental laws to which we are subject have become more
stringent over time, however, and we could incur material costs
or expenses in the future to comply with environmental laws. For
example, our Northampton, U.K. facility will likely be required
to obtain an Integrated Pollution Prevention Control
(IPPC) permit prior to 2007. That permit will
require that we use best available techniques at the facility to
minimize pollution. Although the requirements of the permit are
not yet known, because the facility is already operating under
an integrated pollution control permit, we do not expect to have
to make material capital expenditures to obtain or comply with
the IPPC permit.
Certain of our operations generate hazardous substances and
wastes. If a release of such substances or wastes occurs at or
from our properties, or at or from any offsite disposal location
to which substances or wastes from our current or former
operations were taken, or if contamination is discovered at any
of our current or former properties, we may be held liable for
the costs of cleanup and for any other response by governmental
authorities or private parties, together with any associated
fines, penalties or damages. In most jurisdictions, this
liability would arise whether or not we had complied with
environmental laws governing the handling of hazardous
substances or wastes.
In connection with the Mayflower and MWC acquisitions, we
obtained indemnities for certain environmental liabilities
relating to the acquired and leased facilities, subject to
certain limitations. However, we cannot assure you that the
sellers will be able to satisfy all of their obligations under
these indemnities or that these indemnities will cover all
environmental liabilities that might arise.
73
Government Regulation
The products we manufacture and supply to commercial vehicle
OEMs are not subject to significant government regulation. Our
business, however, is indirectly impacted by the extensive
governmental regulation applicable to commercial vehicle OEMs.
These regulations primarily relate to safety, emissions and
noise standards imposed by the EPA, state regulatory agencies,
such as the California Air Resources Board (CARB), and other
regulatory agencies around the world. Commercial vehicle OEMs
are also subject to the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle
Safety Act and Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
promulgated by the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration.
Changes in emission standards and other governmental regulations
impact the demand for commercial vehicles and, as a result,
indirectly impact our operations. For example, new emission
standards governing heavy-duty diesel engines that went into
effect in the United States on October 1, 2002 resulted in
significant purchases of new trucks by fleet operators prior to
such date and reduced short term demand for such trucks in
periods following such date. New emission standards for engines
used in Class 5 to 8 trucks imposed by the EPA and CARB are
scheduled to come into effect during 2007.
74
MANAGEMENT
Executive Officers and Directors
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to our current directors and executive officers. (ages as of
March 31, 2005).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Principal Position(s) |
|
|
| |
|
|
Scott D. Rued
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Chairman and Director |
Mervin Dunn
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
Gerald L. Armstrong
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
President CVG Americas |
Gordon Boyd
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
President CVG International |
James F. Williams
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
Vice President of Human Resources |
Chad M. Utrup
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
S.A. Johnson
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
Director |
David R. Bovee
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
Director |
Eric J. Rosen
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
Director |
Richard A. Snell
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
Director |
The following biographies describe the business experience of
our directors and executive officers.
Scott D. Rued has served as a Director since February
2001 and Chairman since April 2002. Since September 2003,
Mr. Rued has served as a Managing Partner of Thayer Capital
Partners (Thayer). Prior to joining Thayer,
Mr. Rued served as President and Chief Executive Officer of
Hidden Creek from May 2000 to August 2003. From January 1994
through April 2000, Mr. Rued served as Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Hidden Creek.
Mr. Rued is presently the Chairman and a Director of Dura
Automotive Systems, Inc., a manufacturer of driver control
systems, window systems and door systems for the global
automotive industry.
Mervin Dunn has served as our President and Chief
Executive Officer since June 2002, and prior thereto served as
the President of Trim Systems, commencing upon his joining us in
October 1999. From 1998 to 1999, Mr. Dunn served as the
President and Chief Executive Officer of Bliss Technologies, a
heavy metal stamping company. From 1988 to 1998, Mr. Dunn
served in a number of key leadership roles at Arvin Industries,
including Vice President of Operating Systems (Arvin North
America), Vice President of Quality, and President of Arvin Ride
Control. From 1985 to 1988, Mr. Dunn held several key
management positions in engineering and quality assurance at
Johnson Controls Automotive Group, an automotive trim company,
including Division Quality Manager. From 1980 to 1985,
Mr. Dunn served in a number of management positions for
engineering and quality departments of Hyster Corporation, a
manufacturer of heavy lift trucks.
Gerald L. Armstrong has served as the
President CVG Americas since March 2003. From July
2002 to March 2003, Mr. Armstrong served as Vice President
and General Manager of National Seating and KAB North America.
Prior to joining us, Mr. Armstrong served from 1995 to 2000
and from 2000 to July 2002 as Vice President and General
Manager, respectively, of Gabriel Ride Control Products, a
manufacturer of shock absorbers and related ride control
products for the automotive and light truck markets, and a
wholly owned subsidiary of ArvinMeritor Inc. Mr. Armstrong
began his service with ArvinMeritor Inc., a manufacturer of
automotive and commercial vehicle components, modules and
systems in 1987, and served in various positions of increasing
responsibility within its light vehicle original equipment and
aftermarket divisions before starting at Gabriel Ride Control
Products. Prior to 1987, Mr. Armstrong held various
positions of increasing responsibility including Quality
Engineer and Senior Quality Supervisor and Quality Manager with
Schlumberger Industries and Hyster Corporation.
Gordon Boyd has served as President CVG
International since June 2005 and prior thereto served as our
President Mayflower Vehicle Systems from the time we
completed the acquisition of Mayflower in
75
February 2005. Mr. Boyd joined Mayflower Vehicle Systems
U.K. as Manufacturing Director in 1993. In 2002, Mr. Boyd
became President and Chief Executive Officer of MVS, Inc.
James F. Williams has served as the Vice President of
Human Resources since August 1999. Prior to joining us,
Mr. Williams served as Corporate Vice President of Human
Resources and Administration for SPECO Corporation from January
1996 to August 1999. From April 1984 to January 1996,
Mr. Williams served in various key human resource
management positions in General Electrics Turbine,
Lighting and Semi Conductor business. In addition,
Mr. Williams served as Manager of Labor Relations and
Personnel Services at Mack Trucks Allentown Corporate
location from 1976 to 1984.
Chad M. Utrup has served as the Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer since January 2003, and prior thereto served
as the Vice President of Finance at Trim Systems since 2000.
Prior to joining us in February 1998, Mr. Utrup served as a
project management group member at Electronic Data Systems.
While with Electronic Data Systems, Mr. Utrups
responsibilities included financial support and implementing
cost recovery and efficiency programs at various Delphi
Automotive Systems support locations.
Sankey A. (Tony) Johnson has served as a
Director since September 2000. Mr. Johnson served as the
Chairman of Hidden Creek from May 2001 to May 2004 and from 1989
to May 2001 was its Chief Executive Officer and President. Prior
to forming Hidden Creek, Mr. Johnson served from 1985 to
1989 as Chief Operating Officer of Pentair, Inc., a diversified
industrial company. Mr. Johnson is also Chairman and
Director of Tower Automotive, Inc., and a Director of J.L.
French Automotive Castings, Inc.
David R. Bovee has served as a Director since October
2004. Mr. Bovee has served as Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Dura Automotive Systems, Inc.
(Dura) from January 2001 to March 2005 and from
November 1990 to May 1997. From May 1997 until January 2001,
Mr. Bovee served as Vice President of Business Development
for Dura. Mr. Bovee also served as Duras Assistant
Secretary. Prior to joining Dura, Mr. Bovee served as Vice
President at Wickes Manufacturing Company in its Automotive
Group from 1987 to 1990.
Eric J. Rosen has served as a Director since August 2004.
Mr. Rosen has served as a partner at MSD Capital, L.P., a
New York based investment firm, since March 2005. Prior to
joining MSD Capital, Mr. Rosen served as Managing Director
of Onex Investment Corp., an affiliate of Onex Corporation, a
diversified industrial corporation, from 1994 to March 2005.
Mr. Rosen served as a Vice President of Onex Investment
Corp. from 1989 to 1994. Prior thereto, Mr. Rosen was
employed in the merchant banking group at Kidder,
Peabody & Co. from 1987 to 1989. Mr. Rosen also
currently serves as a Director of J.L. French Automotive
Castings, Inc. and DRS Technologies, Inc.
Richard A. Snell has served as a Director since August
2004. Mr. Snell has served as an Operating Partner at
Thayer Capital Partners since 2003. Prior to joining Thayer,
Mr. Snell was a consultant from 2000 to 2003 and prior
thereto, served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Federal-Mogul Corporation, an automotive parts manufacturer,
from 1996 to 2000. In October 2001, when Mr. Snell was no
longer affiliated with that company, Federal Mogul Corporation
filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under the federal
bankruptcy laws. Prior to joining Federal-Mogul Corporation,
Mr. Snell served as Chief Executive Officer at Tenneco
Automotive, also an automotive parts manufacturer.
Mr. Snell currently serves on the board of Schneider
National, Inc.
Each director is elected to serve until the next annual meeting
of stockholders or until a successor is duly elected and
qualified. Our executive officers are duly elected by the board
to serve until their respective successors are elected and
qualified. There are no family relationships between any of our
directors or executive officers. All of our existing directors
other than Mr. Bovee were elected pursuant to the terms of
an investor stockholders agreement. See Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions Investor
Stockholders Agreement.
76
Composition of the Board of Directors
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides
for a classified board of directors consisting of three
staggered classes of directors, as nearly equal in number as
possible. At each annual meeting of stockholders, a class of
directors is elected for a three-year term to succeed the
directors of the same class whose terms are then expiring. The
terms of the directors expire upon election and qualification of
successor directors at the annual meeting of stockholders to be
held during the years 2006 for the Class II directors, 2007
for the Class III directors and 2008 for the Class I
directors.
The current composition of our board of directors is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
our Class I directors are Scott D. Rued and David R. Bovee; |
|
|
|
our Class II directors are Mervin Dunn and S.A.
Johnson; and |
|
|
|
our Class III directors are Eric J. Rosen and Richard A.
Snell. |
Our amended and restated by-laws provide that the authorized
number of directors, which is six, may be changed by a
resolution adopted by at least two-thirds of our directors then
in office. Any additional directorships resulting from an
increase in number of directors may only be filled by the
directors and will be distributed among the three classes so
that, as nearly as possible, each class will consist of
one-third of the directors. This classification of our board of
directors could have the effect of delaying or preventing
changes in control or changes in our management.
Our board of directors consists of six members, two of whom
qualify as independent according to the rules and
regulations of the SEC and The Nasdaq National Market. The rules
of the SEC and The Nasdaq National Market require that a
majority of our board of directors qualify as
independent no later than the first anniversary of
the completion of our initial public offering. We intend to
comply with these requirements and expect to add additional
independent directors prior to the August 2005
anniversary of the completion of our initial public offering.
Compensation of Directors
Directors who are not our employees or who are not otherwise
affiliated with us or our principal stockholders receive an
annual retainer of $50,000 and are reimbursed for their
out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with board
participation. Compensation arrangements for independent
directors established by our board may be in the form of cash
payments and/or option grants.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
None of our executive officers serves as a member of the board
of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has
one or more executive officers serving on our compensation
committee. No interlocking relationship exists between the board
of directors or the compensation committee of any other company.
See Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions Management and Advisory
Agreements for a discussion of the relationship between us
and Hidden Creek.
Committees of the Board of Directors
Our board of directors has an audit committee, a compensation
committee and a nominating and corporate governance committee.
The board may also establish other committees from time to time
to assist in the discharge of its responsibilities.
Audit Committee. Our audit committee is comprised of
Messrs. Bovee (Chairman), Rued and Snell, of whom
Mr. Snell and Mr. Bovee are independent, as
independence is defined by Rule 4200(a)(15) of the NASD
listing standards. Mr. Bovee has been named as our
audit committee financial expert as such term is
defined in Item 401(h) of Regulation S-K. The audit
committee is responsible for: (1) the appointment,
compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the
independent auditors engaged for the purpose of preparing and
issuing an audit report; (2) reviewing the independence of
the independent
77
auditors and taking, or recommending that our board of directors
take, appropriate action to oversee their independence;
(3) approving, in advance, all audit and non-audit services
to be performed by the independent auditors; (4) overseeing
our accounting and financial reporting processes and the audits
of our financial statements; (5) establishing procedures
for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received
by us regarding accounting, internal control or auditing matters
and the confidential, anonymous submission by our employees of
concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters;
(6) engaging independent counsel and other advisers as the
audit committee deems necessary; (7) determining
compensation of the independent auditors, compensation of
advisors hired by the audit committee and ordinary
administrative expenses; (8) reviewing and assessing the
adequacy of our formal written charter on an annual basis; and
(9) handling such other matters that are specifically
delegated to the audit committee by our board of directors from
time to time. Our board of directors adopted a written charter
for our audit committee, which is posted on our web site.
Deloitte & Touche LLP currently serves as our
independent registered public accounting firm.
Compensation Committee. Our compensation committee is
comprised of Messrs Bovee, Johnson and Snell (Chairman), of
whom, Mr. Snell and Mr. Bovee are independent, as
independence is defined by Rule 4200(a)(15) of the NASD
listing standards. The compensation committee is responsible
for: (1) determining, or recommending to our board of
directors for determination, the compensation and benefits of
all of our executive officers; (2) reviewing our
compensation and benefit plans to ensure that they meet
corporate objectives; (3) administering our stock plans and
other incentive compensation plans; and (4) such other
matters that are specifically delegated to the compensation
committee by our board of directors from time to time. Our board
of directors adopted a written charter for our compensation
committee, which is posted on our web site.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Our
nominating and corporate governance committee is comprised of
Messrs. Rued (Chairman), Snell and Bovee, of whom,
Mr. Snell and Mr. Bovee are independent, as
independence is defined by Rule 4200(a)(15) of the NASD
listing standards. The nominating and corporate governance
committee is responsible for: (1) selecting, or
recommending to our board of directors for selection, nominees
for election to our board of directors; (2) making
recommendations to our board of directors regarding the size and
composition of the board, committee structure and makeup and
retirement procedures affecting board members;
(3) monitoring our performance in meeting our obligations
of fairness in internal and external matters and our principles
of corporate governance; and (4) such other matters that
are specifically delegated to the nominating and corporate
governance committee by our board of directors from time to
time. Our board of directors adopted a written charter for our
nominating and corporate governance committee, which
specifically addresses the nominations process and is posted on
our web site at www.cvgrp.com.
Additional independent directors will be added prior
to the anniversary of our August 2004 initial public offering to
replace existing members of our audit, compensation and
nominating and corporate governance committees to the extent
necessary to comply with the applicable rules and regulations of
the SEC and The Nasdaq National Market.
78
Compensation of Executive Officers
The following table sets forth information concerning the
compensation earned for the last two fiscal years by our Chief
Executive Officer and the four other executive officers who were
our most highly compensated executive officers in our last
fiscal year (collectively, the Named Executive
Officers).
Summary Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Term | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation | |
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation ($) | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Stock Option | |
|
All Other | |
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year | |
|
Salary | |
|
Bonus | |
|
Other(1) | |
|
Awards (Shares) | |
|
Compensation ($)(2) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Mervin Dunn
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
330,000 |
|
|
|
297,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
476,664 |
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
President and Chief |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
314,995 |
|
|
|
167,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,725 |
|
|
Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donald P. Lorraine(3)
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
250,984 |
|
|
|
164,925 |
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
President CVG Europe |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
217,261 |
|
|
|
90,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Asia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gerald L. Armstrong
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
230,000 |
|
|
|
81,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,973 |
|
|
|
6,479 |
|
|
President CVG Americas |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
170,000 |
|
|
|
31,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,100 |
|
James F. Williams
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
172,000 |
|
|
|
79,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,133 |
|
|
|
4,839 |
|
|
Vice President of Human |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
165,007 |
|
|
|
84,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,475 |
|
|
Resources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chad M. Utrup
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
158,500 |
|
|
|
75,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,980 |
|
|
|
5,717 |
|
|
Vice President of Finance and |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
151,008 |
|
|
|
74,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,265 |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Pursuant to applicable SEC regulations, perquisites and other
personal benefits are omitted because they did not exceed the
lesser of either $50,000 or 10% of total annual salary and bonus. |
|
(2) |
Consists of matching payments under one of our 401(k) plans. |
|
(3) |
Amounts paid to Mr. Lorraine for fiscal 2003 have been
translated into United States dollars at a rate of
$1.6532 = £1.00, the average exchange rate during
the year ended December 31, 2003. Amounts paid to
Mr. Lorraine for fiscal 2004 have been translated into
United States dollars at a rate of
$1.8325 = £1.00, the average exchange rate during
the year ended December 31, 2004. |
|
(4) |
Consists of $73,300 paid in cash and $91,625 contributed to
Mr. Lorraines pension plan. |
79
Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year
The following table sets forth information with respect to the
grants of stock options to each of the Named Executive Officers
during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. The
percentage of total options set forth below is based on an
aggregate of 1,509,819 options granted to employees during
fiscal 2004. Potential realizable values are net of exercise
price, but before taxes associated with exercise. Amounts
representing hypothetical gains are those that could be achieved
for the options if exercised at the end of the option term. The
assumed 5% and 10% rates of stock price appreciation are
provided in accordance with SEC rules based on the fair market
value of the stock at the time of option grant, and do not
represent our estimate or projection of the future stock price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Grants | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Potential Realizable | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
% of Total | |
|
|
|
Value at Assumed | |
|
|
Shares of | |
|
Options | |
|
|
|
Fair | |
|
|
|
Annual Rates of Stock | |
|
|
Common Stock | |
|
Granted to | |
|
|
|
Market | |
|
|
|
Price Appreciation for | |
|
|
Underlying | |
|
Employees in | |
|
Exercise | |
|
Value on | |
|
|
|
Option Term ($) | |
|
|
Options | |
|
Fiscal Year | |
|
Price Per | |
|
Date of | |
|
Expiration | |
|
| |
|
|
Granted(1) | |
|
2004 | |
|
Share ($) | |
|
Grant ($) | |
|
Date | |
|
5% | |
|
10% | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Mervin Dunn
|
|
|
306,664 |
|
|
|
20.3 |
|
|
|
5.54 |
|
|
|
16.00 |
|
|
|
4/30/14 |
|
|
|
1,068,441 |
|
|
|
2,707,639 |
|
|
|
|
170,000 |
(1) |
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
15.84 |
|
|
|
15.84 |
|
|
|
10/20/14 |
|
|
|
1,693,487 |
|
|
|
4,291,630 |
|
Donald P. Lorraine
|
|
|
72,133 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
5.54 |
|
|
|
16.00 |
|
|
|
4/30/14 |
|
|
|
251,317 |
|
|
|
636,886 |
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
(1) |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
15.84 |
|
|
|
15.84 |
|
|
|
10/20/14 |
|
|
|
298,851 |
|
|
|
757,346 |
|
Gerald L. Armstrong
|
|
|
82,973 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
5.54 |
|
|
|
16.00 |
|
|
|
4/30/14 |
|
|
|
289,084 |
|
|
|
732,596 |
|
|
|
|
60,000 |
(1) |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
15.84 |
|
|
|
15.84 |
|
|
|
10/20/14 |
|
|
|
597,701 |
|
|
|
1,514,693 |
|
James F. Williams
|
|
|
72,133 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
5.54 |
|
|
|
16.00 |
|
|
|
4/30/14 |
|
|
|
251,317 |
|
|
|
636,886 |
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
(1) |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
15.84 |
|
|
|
15.84 |
|
|
|
10/20/14 |
|
|
|
298,851 |
|
|
|
757,346 |
|
Chad M. Utrup
|
|
|
91,980 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
5.54 |
|
|
|
16.00 |
|
|
|
4/30/14 |
|
|
|
320,465 |
|
|
|
812,122 |
|
|
|
|
60,000 |
(1) |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
15.84 |
|
|
|
15.84 |
|
|
|
10/20/14 |
|
|
|
597,701 |
|
|
|
1,514,693 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Options vest in three equal annual installments commencing on
the first anniversary of their grant date, October 20, 2004. |
Option Exercises in Last Fiscal Year and Fiscal Year-End
Option Values
The following table sets forth the number of shares of common
stock subject to options and the value of such options held by
each of the Named Executive Officers as of December 31,
2004. The value of the unexercised options has been calculated
assuming a per share price of $21.83, which was the closing
price of our common stock on December 31, 2004. None of our
Named Executive Officers exercised options during 2004.
Aggregated Option Exercises During Last Fiscal Year
and Fiscal Year End Option Values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares Underlying | |
|
Value of Unexercised | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised Options at | |
|
In-The-Money Options at | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2004 ($) | |
|
|
Acquired on | |
|
Value | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Exercise | |
|
Realized | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Mervin Dunn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306,664 |
|
|
|
170,000 |
|
|
|
4,995,557 |
|
|
|
1,018,300 |
|
Donald P. Lorraine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,133 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
1,175,047 |
|
|
|
179,700 |
|
Gerald L. Armstrong
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,973 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
1,351,630 |
|
|
|
359,400 |
|
James F. Williams
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,133 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
1,175,047 |
|
|
|
179,700 |
|
Chad M. Utrup
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,980 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
1,498,354 |
|
|
|
359,400 |
|
80
Change in Control and Non-Competition Agreements
We have agreements with each of our Named Executive Officers
pursuant to which each is entitled to a severance payment equal
to 12 months salary, bonus, medical and outplacement
assistance for a period of one year in the event of termination
without cause following a change of control.
We have also entered into non-competition agreements with
certain of our executive officers pursuant to which each has
agreed not to compete with us during the period in which each is
employed by us and for a two-year period thereafter.
Employment Agreements
We have entered into an employment agreement, dated as of
May 16, 1997, with Donald P. Lorraine, pursuant to which
Mr. Lorraine serves as the President CVG,
Europe and Asia. The employment agreement with Mr. Lorraine
continues until terminated by either party, and will
automatically terminate under certain circumstances. The
employment agreement provides for a base salary that is subject
to annual review and a performance related bonus. If within one
year of a change of control, Mr. Lorraine resigns, his
employment is terminated or there is a material change in his
responsibilities, or if we materially breach the employment
agreement, Mr. Lorraine will be entitled to receive
24 months salary, payable on termination of the
employment agreement, and the value of certain of his benefits
had the employment agreement continued for a further period of
24 months. The employment agreement contains various
customary covenants, relating to confidentiality,
non-competition and non-solicitation.
On March 1, 1993, William Gordon Boyd entered into a
Service Agreement with Motor Panels (Coventry) PLC. This
agreement, which was amended on January 7, 2002 to provide
for Mr. Boyds relocation from the United Kingdom to
the United States, was assumed by us in connection with the
Mayflower acquisition. Pursuant to this agreement, Mr. Boyd
is entitled to receive a base salary of $469,376 (subject to
annual review) and a bonus. It also provides that Mr. Boyd
is entitled to 25 vacation days a year, reimbursement for the
cost of renting an apartment or house in the United States and
other out of pocket expenses, a country club membership, a
company car and six return flights to the United Kingdom a year
for social purposes. Mr. Boyds employment may be
terminated at any time by either party by giving to the other no
less than 12 months notice. This agreement also contains
customary non-competition and non-solicitation provisions.
2005 Bonus Plan
On February 1, 2005, our compensation committee adopted the
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. 2005 Bonus Plan. Pursuant to its
terms, participants in the plan will be entitled to receive a
bonus for the 2005 fiscal year based upon (1) a bonus
percentage assigned to the participant by the compensation
committee, (2) the achievement of certain company or
business unit performance thresholds and (3) the
satisfaction of operating targets related to the
participants individual responsibilities. Each of our
executive officers is eligible to participate in this plan.
81
Pension Plan
We sponsor a defined benefit plan that covers certain of our
employees in the United Kingdom. The following table illustrates
the approximate annual pension benefits payable under this
pension plan to Mr. Lorraine, one of our Named Executive
Officers. All amounts have been translated into United States
dollars at a rate of $1.8325 = £1.00, the average
exchange rate during the year ended December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years of Service at Retirement | |
|
|
| |
Compensation |
|
15 | |
|
20 | |
|
25 | |
|
30 | |
|
35 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$125,000
|
|
|
31,250 |
|
|
|
41,667 |
|
|
|
52,083 |
|
|
|
62,500 |
|
|
|
72,917 |
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
37,500 |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
62,500 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
87,500 |
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
43,750 |
|
|
|
58,333 |
|
|
|
72,917 |
|
|
|
87,500 |
|
|
|
102,083 |
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
66,667 |
|
|
|
83,333 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
116,667 |
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
56,250 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
93,750 |
|
|
|
112,500 |
|
|
|
131,250 |
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
62,500 |
|
|
|
83,333 |
|
|
|
104,167 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
145,833 |
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
175,000 |
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
133,333 |
|
|
|
166,667 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
233,333 |
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
112,500 |
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
187,500 |
|
|
|
225,000 |
|
|
|
262,500 |
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
166,667 |
|
|
|
208,333 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
291,667 |
|
Pension benefits are calculated on the basis of one sixtieth of
final pensionable salary for each year of service. The
definition of final pensionable salary is an average of the best
three consecutive salaries in the 10 years prior to
retirement. Benefits shown in the table are computed on a
straight life annuity (with a 10-year certain term) beginning at
age 60 and not subject to any deduction for any other
social security benefits. Mr. Lorraine has 24 years of
credited service under the plan.
Employee Benefit Plans
In connection with our initial public offering, we adopted our
Equity Incentive Plan (the Equity Incentive Plan),
which is designed to enable us to attract, retain and motivate
our directors, officers, employees and consultants, and to
further align their interests with those of our stockholders, by
providing for or increasing their ownership interests in our
company. Effective April 27, 2005, we amended our Equity
Incentive Plan to make certain technical amendments to make it
compliant with Rule 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
Administration. The Equity Incentive Plan is administered
by the compensation committee. Our board may, however, at any
time resolve to administer the Equity Incentive Plan. Subject to
the specific provisions of the Equity Incentive Plan, the
compensation committee is authorized to select persons to
participate in the Equity Incentive Plan, determine the form and
substance of grants made under the Equity Incentive Plan to each
participant, and otherwise make all determinations for the
administration of the Equity Incentive Plan.
Participation. Individuals who are eligible to
participate in the Equity Incentive Plan are our directors
(including non-employee directors), officers (including
non-employee officers) and employees and other individuals
performing services for, or to whom an offer of employment has
been extended by, us or our subsidiaries.
Type of Awards. The Equity Incentive Plan provides for
the issuance of stock options, stock appreciation rights, or
SARs, restricted stock units, deferred stock units, dividend
equivalents, other stock-based awards and performance awards.
Performance awards may be based on the achievement of certain
business or personal criteria or goals, as determined by the
compensation committee.
Available Shares. An aggregate of 1,000,000 shares
of our common stock have been reserved for issuance under the
Equity Incentive Plan, subject to certain adjustments reflecting
changes in our
82
capitalization. If any grant under the Equity Incentive Plan
expires or terminates unexercised, becomes unexercisable or is
forfeited as to any shares, or is tendered or withheld as to any
shares in payment of the exercise price of the grant or the
taxes payable with respect to the exercise, then such
unpurchased, forfeited, tendered or withheld shares will
thereafter be available for further grants under the Equity
Incentive Plan. The Equity Incentive Plan provides that the
compensation committee shall not grant, in any one calendar
year, to any one participant awards to purchase or acquire a
number of shares of common stock in excess of 20% of the total
number of shares authorized for issuance under the Equity
Incentive Plan.
Option Grants. Options granted under the Equity Incentive
Plan may be either incentive stock options within the meaning of
Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code or non-qualified
stock options, as the compensation committee may determine. The
exercise price per share for each option is established by the
compensation committee, except that the exercise price may not
be less than 100% of the fair market value of a share of common
stock as of the date of grant of the option. In the case of the
grant of any incentive stock option to an employee who, at the
time of the grant, owns more than 10% of the total combined
voting power of all of our classes of stock then outstanding,
the exercise price may not be less than 110% of the fair market
value of a share of common stock as of the date of grant of the
option.
Terms of Options. The term during which each option may
be exercised is determined by the compensation committee, but if
required by the Internal Revenue Code and except as otherwise
provided in the Equity Incentive Plan, no option will be
exercisable in whole or in part more than ten years from the
date it is granted, and no incentive stock option granted to an
employee who at the time of the grant owns more than 10% of the
total combined voting power of all of our classes of stock will
be exercisable more than five years from the date it is granted.
All rights to purchase shares pursuant to an option will, unless
sooner terminated, expire at the date designated by the
compensation committee. The compensation committee determines
the date on which each option will become exercisable and may
provide that an option will become exercisable in installments.
The shares constituting each installment may be purchased in
whole or in part at any time after such installment becomes
exercisable, subject to such minimum exercise requirements as
may be designated by the compensation committee. Prior to the
exercise of an option and delivery of the shares represented
thereby, the optionee will have no rights as a stockholder,
including any dividend or voting rights, with respect to any
shares covered by such outstanding option. If required by the
Internal Revenue Code, the aggregate fair market value,
determined as of the grant date, of shares for which an
incentive stock option is exercisable for the first time during
any calendar year under all of our equity incentive plans may
not exceed $100,000.
Stock Appreciation Rights. SARs entitle a participant to
receive the amount by which the fair market value of a share of
our common stock on the date of exercise exceeds the grant price
of the SAR. The grant price and the term of a SAR will be
determined by the compensation committee, except that the price
of a SAR may never be less than the fair market value of the
shares of our common stock subject to the SAR on the date the
SAR is granted.
Termination of Options and SARs. Unless otherwise
determined by the compensation committee, and subject to certain
exemptions and conditions, if a participant ceases to be a
director, officer or employee of, or to otherwise perform
services for us for any reason other than death, disability,
retirement or termination for cause, all of the
participants options and SARs that were exercisable on the
date of such cessation will remain exercisable for, and will
otherwise terminate at the end of, a period of 90 days
after the date of such cessation. In the case of death or
disability, all of the participants options and SARs that
were exercisable on the date of such death or disability will
remain so for a period of 180 days from the date of such
death or disability. In the case of retirement, all of the
participants options and SARs that were exercisable on the
date of retirement will remain exercisable for, and shall
otherwise terminate at the end of, a period of 90 days
after the date of retirement. In the case of a termination for
cause, or if a participant does not become a director, officer
or employee of, or does not begin performing other services for
us for any reason, all of the participants options and
SARs will expire and be forfeited immediately upon such
cessation or non-commencement, whether or not then exercisable.
83
Restricted Stock Units and Deferred Stock Units. The
compensation committee is authorized to grant restricted stock
units. Each grant shall specify the applicable restrictions on
such units and the duration of such restrictions. Restricted
stock units are subject to forfeiture in the event of certain
terminations of employment prior to the end of the restricted
period. A participant may elect, under certain circumstances, to
defer the receipt of all or a portion of the shares due with
respect to the vesting of restricted stock units, and upon such
deferral, the restricted stock units will be converted to
deferred stock units. Deferral periods shall be no less than one
year after the vesting date of the applicable restricted stock
units. Deferred stock units are subject to forfeiture in the
event of certain terminations of employment prior to the end of
the deferral period. A holder of restricted stock units or
deferred stock units does not have any rights as a shareholder
except that the participant has the right to receive accumulated
dividends or distributions with respect to the shares underlying
such restricted stock units or deferred stock units.
Dividend Equivalents. Dividend equivalents confer the
right to receive, currently or on a deferred basis, cash, shares
of our common stock, other awards or other property equal in
value to dividends paid on a specific number of shares of our
common stock. Dividend equivalents may be granted alone or in
connection with another award, and may be paid currently or on a
deferred basis. If deferred, dividend equivalents may be deemed
to have been reinvested in additional shares of our common stock.
Other Stock-Based Awards. The compensation committee is
authorized to grant other awards that are denominated or payable
in, valued by reference to, or otherwise based on or related to
shares of our common stock, under the Equity Incentive Plan.
These awards may include convertible or exchangeable debt
securities, other rights convertible or exchangeable into shares
of common stock, purchase rights for shares of common stock,
awards with value and payment contingent upon our performance as
a company or any other factors designated by the compensation
committee. The compensation committee will determine the terms
and conditions of these awards.
Performance Awards. The compensation committee may
subject a participants right to exercise or receive a
grant or settlement of an award, and the timing of the grant or
settlement, to performance conditions specified by the
compensation committee. Performance awards may be granted under
the Equity Incentive Plan in a manner that results in their
qualifying as performance-based compensation exempt from the
limitation on tax deductibility under Section 162(m) of the
Internal Revenue Code for compensation in excess of $1,000,000
paid to our chief executive officer and our four highest
compensated officers. The compensation committee will determine
performance award terms, including the required levels of
performance with respect to particular business criteria, the
corresponding amounts payable upon achievement of those levels
of performance, termination and forfeiture provisions and the
form of settlement. In granting performance awards, the
compensation committee may establish unfunded award
pools, the amounts of which will be based upon the
achievement of a performance goal or goals based on one or more
business criteria. Business criteria might include, for example,
total stockholder return, net income, pretax earnings, EBITDA,
earnings per share, or return on investment. A performance award
will be paid no later than two and one-half months after the
last day of the tax year in which a performance period is
completed.
Amendment of Outstanding Awards and Amendment/ Termination of
Plan. The board of directors or the compensation committee
generally have the power and authority to amend or terminate the
Equity Incentive Plan at any time without approval from our
stockholders. The compensation committee generally has the
authority to amend the terms of any outstanding award under the
plan, including, without limitation, to accelerate the dates on
which awards become exercisable or vest, at any time without
approval from our stockholders. No amendment will become
effective without the prior approval of our stockholders if
stockholder approval would be required by applicable law or
regulations, including if required for continued compliance with
the performance-based compensation exception of
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, under
provisions of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code or
by any listing requirement of the principal stock exchange on
which our common stock is then listed. Unless previously
terminated by the board or the committee, the Equity Incentive
Plan will terminate on the tenth anniversary of its adoption. No
termination of the Equity Incentive Plan will materially and
adversely
84
affect any of the rights or obligations of any person, without
his or her written consent, under any grant of options or other
incentives theretofore granted under the Equity Incentive Plan.
On October 20, 2004, options to purchase an aggregate of
598,950 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of
$15.84 per share were awarded by the compensation committee
under the Equity Incentive Plan. These options, which expire on
October 20, 2014, vest annually in three approximately
equal installments starting upon the first anniversary of their
issuance. Of the awards granted, options to
purchase 350,000 shares of our common stock were
issued to our directors and executive officers.
|
|
|
Management Stock Option Plan |
On May 20, 2004, our board of directors approved our
Management Stock Option Plan, which authorizes the grant of
nonqualified stock options to our executives and other key
employees. Awards to purchase an aggregate of
910,869 shares of our common stock were granted on
May 20, 2004, at an exercise price of $5.54 per share,
to 16 members of our management team (after giving effect to the
reclassification and stock split). As modified, such options
have a ten-year term, with 100% of such options being currently
exercisable. Awards were granted to a participant pursuant to an
agreement entered into between us and such person. The
provisions of these agreements set forth the types of awards
being granted, the total number of shares of common stock
subject to the award, the price, the periods during which such
award may be exercised and other terms, provisions and
limitations approved by our board of directors or its designated
committee. We do not intend to issue any additional options
under this plan. Members of our management team are exercising
options issued under this plan to purchase 265,530 shares
of our common stock in connection with this offering. The shares
issued upon exercise of such options will be sold as part of the
6,368,446 shares being sold by the selling stockholders.
|
|
|
Other Outstanding Options |
In connection with our merger with Trim Systems, options to
purchase 15,000 shares of Trim Systems, Inc.s
common stock at an exercise price of $36.40 per share were
converted into options to purchase 57,902 shares of
our common stock at an exercise price of $9.43 per share.
We sponsor various tax-qualified employee savings and retirement
plans, or 401(k) plans, that cover most employees who satisfy
certain eligibility requirements relating to minimum age and
length of service. Under the 401(k) plans, eligible employees
may elect to contribute a minimum of 1% of their annual
compensation, up to a maximum amount equal to the lesser of 6%
of their annual compensation or the statutorily prescribed
annual limit. We may also elect to make a matching contribution
to the 401(k) plan in an amount equal to a discretionary
percentage of the employee contributions, subject to certain
statutory limitations. We announce annually the amount of funds
which we will match. Our expenses related to these plans
amounted to approximately $463,000, $291,000 and $380,000 in
2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Director and Officer Indemnification and Limitation on
Liability
Our certificate of incorporation provides that, to the fullest
extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law and
except as otherwise provided in our by-laws, none of our
directors shall be liable to us or our stockholders for monetary
damages for a breach of fiduciary duty. In addition, our
certificate of incorporation provides for indemnification of any
person who was or is made, or threatened to be made, a party to
any action, suit or other proceeding, whether criminal, civil,
administrative or investigative, because of his or her status as
a director or officer of CVG, or service as a director, officer,
employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint
venture, trust or other enterprise at our request to the fullest
extent authorized under the Delaware General Corporation Law
against all expenses, liabilities and losses reasonably incurred
by such person. Further, our certificate of incorporation
provides that we may purchase and maintain insurance on our own
behalf and on behalf of any other person who is or was a
director, officer or agent of CVG or was serving at our request
as a director, officer, employee or agent of another
corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other
enterprise.
85
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Relationships Among Certain Stockholders and Directors
Mr. S.A. Johnson, who currently serves as a member of our
board of directors, served as the Chairman of Hidden Creek from
May 2001 to May 2004 and as its Chief Executive Officer from
1989 to May 2001. Hidden Creek is a private industrial
management company that is a partnership controlled by Onex and
is based in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Mr. Scott D. Rued, our
current Chairman, served as an executive officer of Hidden Creek
from June 1989 through August 2003. Both Mr. Johnson and
Mr. Rued are stockholders in a corporation that is the
general partner of Hidden Creek. Former principals of Hidden
Creek have formed Hidden Creek Partners LLC (HCP),
and that entity entered into an advisory agreement with us on
January 1, 2005. See Management and
Advisory Agreements. Onex has no equity interest in HCP.
Two of our former directors, Mr. Daniel F. Moorse and
Ms. Judith A. Vijums were also executive officers of Hidden
Creek. In addition, Messrs. Kenneth W. Hager, David J. Huls
and Carl E. Nelson, were also executive officers of Hidden
Creek. Messrs. Rued, Johnson, Nelson, Hager, Huls and
Moorse and Ms. Vijums were all general partners in J2R
Partners VI (other than Mr. Hager) and J2R
Partners VII and Messrs. Rued, Johnson, Nelson and
Huls and Ms. Vijums were general partners of J2R
Partners II. These three partnerships invested along with
Onex in the acquisitions of Trim Systems, CVS, National and KAB
Seating. In connection with the completion of our initial public
offering, these partnerships wound up and distributed the shares
of common stock they held to their respective partners.
Trim Systems Merger
On August 2, 2004, we merged one of our wholly owned
subsidiaries with and into Trim Systems. Prior to the merger,
Trim Systems was owned by certain of our current and former
directors, officers and principal stockholders. Pursuant to the
merger, the former stockholders of Trim Systems received an
aggregate of 2,769,567 shares of our common stock in
exchange for their shares of Trim Systems. Certain of our
current and former directors, officers and principal
stockholders and other affiliated entities were issued shares in
this merger as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
No. of Shares | |
|
|
| |
Onex and affiliates
|
|
|
2,449,329 |
|
J2R Partners II
|
|
|
217,131 |
|
Mervin Dunn
|
|
|
3,302 |
|
Chad M. Utrup
|
|
|
1,851 |
|
James F. Williams
|
|
|
1,321 |
|
Daniel F. Moorse
|
|
|
2,121 |
|
Scott D. Rued
|
|
|
8,100 |
|
Judith A. Vijums
|
|
|
2,700 |
|
86
CVS Merger
On March 28, 2003, we merged one of our wholly owned
subsidiaries into CVS. Pursuant to the merger, the former
stockholders of CVS received our shares on a one-for-one basis
resulting in the issuance of an aggregate of
4,870,288 shares of our common stock. Certain of our
current and former directors, officers and principal
stockholders and other affiliated entities were issued shares in
this merger as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
No. of Shares | |
|
|
| |
Scott D. Rued
|
|
|
13,647 |
|
S.A. Johnson
|
|
|
45,491 |
|
Judith A. Vijums
|
|
|
2,843 |
|
Daniel F. Moorse
|
|
|
2,843 |
|
Hidden Creek
|
|
|
17,062 |
|
Onex and affiliates
|
|
|
1,949,550 |
|
Baird Capital Partners III L.P. and its affiliates
|
|
|
1,097,519 |
|
Norwest Equity Partners VII L.P.
|
|
|
722,074 |
|
J2R Partners VI
|
|
|
951,302 |
|
Investor Stockholders Agreement
Certain of our stockholders, including certain of our current
and former principal stockholders, are party to an investor
stockholders agreement. This agreement provided that our board
of directors would be comprised of: (1) two representatives
designated by Hidden Creek, (2) one representative
designated by Onex, (3) one representative designated by
Baird Capital Partners III L.P. and its affiliates and
(4) one representative designated by Norwest Equity
Partners VII L.P. Pursuant to the terms of this agreement,
each of the parties agreed to vote their common stock as
directed by J2R Partners VII on the designation of director
representatives, the election of directors and on all other
matters submitted to a vote of stockholders. The voting
provisions of this agreement automatically terminated in
connection with our initial public offering.
This agreement also generally restricts the transfer of any
shares of common stock held by the parties to the agreement by
granting certain parties thereto rights of first offer and
participation rights in connection with any proposed transfer by
any other party, with certain exceptions. In connection with our
merger with Trim Systems, substantially all of the prior
non-management stockholders of Trim Systems were added as
parties to this agreement.
Management Stockholders Agreement
In connection with our merger with Trim Systems, we entered into
a management stockholders agreement with Onex and certain
members of Trim Systems management. Pursuant to this
agreement each management stockholder agreed that, in the event
he shall receive an offer to purchase his stock from another
management stockholder or a CVG employee (either of whom must be
approved by our board of directors), CVG (or at CVGs
option, Onex and the other management stockholders) shall have a
right of first refusal with respect to the stock to be sold.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, a management stockholder may,
after the expiration of any relevant lock-up periods, sell up to
5% of his stock in the public market during any 90-day period,
up to a maximum of one-third of the stock acquired by such
management stockholder prior to such date, subject to a right of
first refusal in favor of CVG, Onex and the other management
stockholders.
The agreement further provides, that in the event a management
stockholder ceases to be employed fulltime by CVG for any
reason, such management stockholder shall be entitled to sell
his stock in the public market; provided that, in the event such
management stockholders employment had terminated due
87
to: (1) retirement, he could sell no more than 75% of his
stock during the first year; (2) death or disability, he
could sell without restriction; and (3) in all other cases,
he could sell no more than 50% of his stock in first year.
In the event our board of directors approves a sale of the
Company (other than a public offering of common stock), the
parties have agreed that the management stockholders shall have
a right to participate in the sale pro rata and that the Company
may require each management stockholder to sell his stock to the
proposed purchaser. The agreement also provides that in the
event we propose to conduct a public offering, the management
stockholders shall have the right, subject to certain
exceptions and limitations, to include their stock in such
offering.
The management stockholders have also agreed to vote their
common stock as directed by Onex on the designation of director
representatives, the election of directors and on all other
matters submitted to a vote of stockholders, and have granted,
to the extent permitted by law, the person who is at any time
the President of Onex a proxy to vote their common stock, with
certain exceptions. The terms of this agreement govern all
common stock owned or later acquired by the management
stockholders other than shares purchased in the open market.
Registration Agreement
Certain of our existing stockholders, including certain of our
current and former principal stockholders, are party to a
registration agreement. This agreement confers upon the parties
thereto, who hold the majority of such stockholders shares
of our common stock, the right to request up to five
registrations of all or any part of their common stock on
Form S-1 or any similar long-form registration statement
or, if available, an unlimited number of registrations on
Form S-2 or S-3 or any similar short-form registration
statement, each at our expense. This agreement also confers upon
Baird Capital Partners III L.P. and its affiliated
investors and/or Norwest Equity Partners VII, L.P. the
right to request an unlimited number of registrations of all or
any part of their common stock on Form S-1 or any similar
long-form registration statement or, if available, on
Form S-2 or S-3 or any similar short-form registration
statement, each at our expense, until such time as such
stockholders shall hold less than 10% of the shares of our stock
that they held as of October 5, 2000. At present, Onex or
its affiliates owns 63% of the shares owned by the parties to
this agreement and Baird Capital Partners III L.P. and its
affiliated investors and Norwest Equity Partners VII L.P. own
55% and 28%, respectively, of the shares of the common stock
they held as of October 5, 2000. After giving effect to
this offering, neither Onex and its affiliates nor Baird Capital
Partners III L.P. and its affiliated investors is expected
to own any of our common stock and will therefore not have the
right to make demand registrations.
In the event that the holders of these securities make such a
demand registration request, all other parties to the
registration agreement will be entitled to participate in such
registration, subject to certain limitations. The registration
agreement also grants to the parties thereto piggyback
registration rights with respect to all other registrations by
us and provides that we will pay all expenses related to such
piggyback registrations.
Management and Advisory Agreements
On October 5, 2000, we entered into a management agreement
with Hidden Creek, which was amended and restated on
March 28, 2003 in connection with the CVS merger. Trim
Systems had a similar management agreement with Hidden Creek
which terminated in accordance with its terms upon our merger
with Trim Systems. On January 1, 2005, HCP entered into an
advisory agreement with us, which replaced the management
agreement with Hidden Creek. Pursuant to the advisory agreement
with HCP, HCP agreed to assist in financing activities,
strategic initiatives, and acquisitions in exchange for an
annual fee of $250,000 (subject to annual increases based on
changes in the consumer price index). In addition, we also
agreed to pay HCP a transaction fee as compensation for services
rendered in transactions that we may enter into from time to
time, in an amount to be negotiated between HCP and our Chief
Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer and approved by our
Board of Directors. In the
88
aggregate, Hidden Creek received $1.1 million,
$1.6 million and $1.0 million for services rendered
under these agreements and related expenses in 2004, 2003 and
2002, respectively.
Transactions with Significant Stockholders
On September 30, 2002, we borrowed an aggregate of
$2.5 million through the issuance of subordinated
promissory notes to certain of our current and former principal
stockholders and affiliated entities as follows: Hidden
Creek $1,507,407, Norwest Equity Partners VII
L.P. $622,222, Baird Capital Partners III L.P.
and its affiliates $370,371. These notes bore
interest at a rate of 12% per annum and had a maturity date
of September 30, 2006. Interest on the notes was payable in
kind on a monthly basis.
On June 28, 2001, Trim Systems Operating Corp. borrowed an
aggregate of $7.0 million through the issuance of two
promissory notes, one to an affiliate of Onex, for
$6.85 million and the other to J2R Partners II-B, LLC,
an affiliate of J2R Partners VI and J2R Partners VII, for
$0.15 million. Each note bore interest, payable monthly, at
a rate of prime plus 1.25% and had a maturity date of
June 28, 2006.
On June 28, 2001, Trim Systems entered into an assignment
and waiver agreement with the lenders under its senior credit
facility whereby an affiliate of Onex and an affiliate of J2R
Partners VI and J2R Partners VII purchased, collectively, a
one-third interest in its senior credit facility.
We used all of the net proceeds from our initial public offering
to repay all of our then outstanding subordinated indebtedness
and a significant portion of then outstanding senior
indebtedness. The table below sets forth the amounts that were
paid to certain of our current and former principal stockholders
or their affiliates upon the repayment of this indebtedness:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholder |
|
Amount | |
|
|
| |
Onex affiliates
|
|
$ |
20,115,772 |
|
Hidden Creek
|
|
|
1,857,728 |
|
J2R Partners affiliates
|
|
|
499,555 |
|
Baird Capital Partners III L.P. and its affiliates
|
|
|
456,445 |
|
Norwest Equity Partners VII L.P.
|
|
|
766,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
23,696,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Affiliate Transactions
On May 1, 2004, we entered into a Product Sourcing
Assistance Agreement with Baird Asia Limited, an affiliate of
Baird Capital Partners III L.P. Pursuant to the agreement,
Baird Asia Limited will assist us in procuring materials and
parts from Asia, including the countries of China, Malaysia,
Hong Kong and Taiwan. Baird Asia Limited will receive as
compensation a percentage of the price of the materials and
parts supplied to us, of at least 2% of the price but not
exceeding 10% of the price, to be determined on a case-by-case
basis. During 2004, we made payments of approximately $234,000
to Baird Asia Limited under this agreement. Of this amount
approximately $7,000 was retained by Baird Asia Limited as its
commission under the Product Sourcing Assistance Agreement.
89
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
The table below sets forth certain information with respect to
the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of
March 31, 2005 and the anticipated beneficial ownership of
our common stock following the consummation of this offering by:
|
|
|
|
|
each person or entity known by us to beneficially own five
percent or more of a class of our voting common stock; |
|
|
|
each director and named executive officer; and |
|
|
|
all of our directors and executive officers as a group. |
Unless otherwise stated, each of the persons named in the table
has sole voting and investment power with respect to the
securities beneficially owned by it, him or her as set forth
opposite their name. Beneficial ownership of the common stock
listed in the table has been determined in accordance with the
applicable rules and regulations promulgated under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act).
For more information regarding the terms of the common stock,
see Description of Capital Stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially Owned | |
|
Shares Beneficially Owned | |
|
|
Prior to the Offering | |
|
After the Offering | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
5% Stockholders |
|
Number | |
|
Percentage | |
|
Number | |
|
Percentage | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Onex American Holdings II LLC and affiliated investors(1)
|
|
|
4,801,576 |
|
|
|
26.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC(2)
|
|
|
1,519,803 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
1,519,803 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
% |
Baird Capital Partners III L.P. and affiliated investors(3)
|
|
|
1,174,465 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cramer Rosenthal McGlynn, LLC(4)
|
|
|
1,139,250 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
1,139,250 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
Alliance Entities(5)
|
|
|
1,052,908 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
1,052,908 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
Pequot Capital Management, Inc.(6)
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
Wachovia Corporation(7)
|
|
|
997,447 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
997,447 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Named Executive Officers and Directors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mervin Dunn(8)
|
|
|
309,966 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
216,976 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Donald P. Lorraine(9)
|
|
|
72,133 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
50,493 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Gerald L. Armstrong(10)
|
|
|
82,973 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
58,081 |
|
|
|
* |
|
James F. Williams(11)
|
|
|
73,454 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
51,418 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Chad M. Utrup(12)
|
|
|
93,831 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
65,682 |
|
|
|
* |
|
David R. Bovee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.A. Johnson
|
|
|
128,392 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
78,392 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Scott D. Rued
|
|
|
86,479 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
86,479 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Eric J. Rosen(13)
|
|
|
1,298,581 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard A. Snell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (11 persons)
|
|
|
2,145,809 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
607,521 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Denotes less than one percent. |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes 2,679,514 shares held of record by Onex American
Holdings II LLC (Onex AH), 117,143 shares
held of record by Bostrom Executive Investco LLC,
82,155 shares held of record by CVS Executive Investco LLC,
1,252,166 shares held of record by Onex DHC LLC,
319,633 shares held of record by Onex Advisor III LLC,
54,849 shares held of record by Hidden Creek and an
aggregate of 296,116 shares held of record by certain
employees and related parties of Onex Corporation or one of its
subsidiaries (collectively, the Onex Stockholders).
Onex AH has voting and dispositive power with respect to all of
the shares held by the other Onex Stockholders. Onex AH is an
indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Onex Corporation.
Mr. Gerald W. Schwartz is the indirect holder of all the
issued and outstanding Multiple Voting Shares of Onex
Corporation, which are entitled to elect 60% of the members of
its board of directors and carry such number of votes in |
90
|
|
|
|
|
the aggregate as represents 60% of the aggregate votes attached
to all voting shares of Onex Corporation and is thus an indirect
beneficial owner of the shares reported. The address for Onex
Corporation and Mr. Schwartz is 161 Bay Street, P.O.
Box 700, Toronto, Ontario M5J 2S1 and the address for
Onex AH and the other Onex Stockholders is c/o Onex
Investment Corp., 712 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York
10019. |
|
|
(2) |
Information reported is based on a Schedule 13G as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 2,
2005. The address for Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC is
90 Hudson Street, Jersey City, New Jersey 07302. |
|
|
(3) |
Includes 701,153 shares held by Baird Capital
Partners III L.P.; 146,247 shares held by Baird
Capital Partners II L.P.; 140,241 shares held by
BCP III Affiliates Fund L.P.; 100,043 shares held
by BCP III Special Affiliates L.P.; and 86,781 shares
held by BCP II Affiliates Fund L.P. Each of these
investment funds are controlled, either directly or indirectly,
by Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated, which is the
ultimate beneficial owner of such shares held by these
investment funds. The address for Robert W. Baird & Co.
Incorporated and each of these investment funds is
777 E. Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202. |
|
|
(4) |
Information reported is based on a Schedule 13G as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 22,
2005. The address for Cramer Rosenthal McGlynn, LLC is 520
Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10022. |
|
|
(5) |
Information reported is based on a Schedule 13G as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14,
2005. The Alliance Entities are comprised of AXA Financial,
Inc., which is owned by AXA, which in turn is under the group
control of AXA Assurances I.A.R.D. Mutuelle, AXA Assurances Vie
Mutuelle and AXA Courtage Assurance Mutuelle. The address for
AXA Assurances I.A.R.D. Mutuelle, AXA Assurances Vie Mutuelle
and AXA Courtage Assurances Mutuelle is 26, rue Drouot, 75009
Paris, France. The address for AXA is 25, avenue Matignon, 75008
Paris, France. The address for AXA Financial, Inc. is
1290 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10104. |
|
|
(6) |
Information reported is based on a Schedule 13G as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14,
2005. The address for Pequot Capital Management, Inc. is
500 Nyala Farm Road, Westport, Connecticut 06880. |
|
|
(7) |
Information reported is based on a Schedule 13G as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 3,
2005. The address for Wachovia Corporation is One Wachovia
Center, Charlotte, North Carolina 28288. |
|
|
(8) |
Includes 306,664 shares issuable upon exercise of currently
exercisable options. Mr. Dunn intends to exercise options
to purchase 89,688 shares in connection with this offering,
and, as a result, will have 216,976 currently exercisable
options upon completion of this offering. |
|
|
(9) |
Includes 72,133 shares issuable upon exercise of currently
exercisable options. Mr. Lorraine intends to exercise
options to purchase 21,640 shares in connection with this
offering, and, as a result, will have 50,493 currently
exercisable options upon completion of this offering. |
|
|
(10) |
Includes 82,973 shares issuable upon exercise of currently
exercisable options. Mr. Armstrong intends to exercise
options to purchase 24,892 shares in connection with this
offering, and, as a result, will have 58,081 currently
exercisable options upon completion of this offering. |
|
(11) |
Includes 72,133 shares issuable upon exercise of currently
exercisable options. Mr. Williams intends to exercise
options to purchase 20,715 shares in connection with this
offering, and, as a result, will have 51,418 currently
exercisable options upon completion of this offering. |
|
(12) |
Includes 91,980 shares issuable upon exercise of currently
exercisable options. Mr. Utrup intends to exercise options
to purchase 26,298 shares in connection with this offering,
and, as a result, will have 65,682 currently exercisable
options upon completion of this offering. |
|
(13) |
Includes 19,133 shares held by CVS Partners, LP,
27,282 shares held by Bostrom Partners LP and
1,252,166 shares held by Onex DHC LLC. Mr. Rosen is a
limited partner of CVS Partners, LP and Bostrom Partners LP and
a member of Onex DHC LLC and may be deemed to beneficially own
the shares held of record by these entities. Mr. Rosen
disclaims beneficial ownership of any securities in which he
does not have a pecuniary interest. The address for
Mr. Rosen is c/o MSD Capital, L.P., 645 Fifth
Avenue, 21st Floor, New York, New York 10022. |
91
SELLING STOCKHOLDERS
The following table presents certain information regarding the
amount of shares of our common stock to be sold by the selling
stockholders. Please see Management, Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, Principal
Stockholders, and Legal Matters for a
description of the material relationships between us and the
selling stockholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially | |
|
|
Shares Beneficially Owned | |
|
|
|
Owned After the | |
|
|
Prior to the Offering | |
|
|
|
Offering | |
|
|
| |
|
Shares Being Sold | |
|
| |
Name of Beneficial Owner |
|
Number | |
|
Percentage | |
|
in the Offering | |
|
Number | |
|
Percentage | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Onex Stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Onex American Holdings II LLC
|
|
|
2,679,514 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
% |
|
|
2,679,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bostrom Executive Investco LLC
|
|
|
117,143 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
117,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CVS Executive Investco LLC
|
|
|
82,155 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
82,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Onex DHC LLC
|
|
|
1,252,166 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
1,252,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trim Systems Executive Investco LLC
|
|
|
48,642 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
48,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trim Systems Executive Investco II LLC
|
|
|
41,479 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
41,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bostrom Partners LP
|
|
|
27,282 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
27,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1170821 Ontario Inc.
|
|
|
19,454 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
19,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1170809 Ontario Inc.
|
|
|
16,340 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
16,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1170812 Ontario Inc.
|
|
|
27,917 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
27,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kyzalea Company
|
|
|
8,939 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
8,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1170819 Ontario Inc.
|
|
|
6,487 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
6,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1170698 Ontario Inc.
|
|
|
5,606 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
5,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1301449 Ontario Inc.
|
|
|
2,561 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
2,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1352536 Ontario Inc.
|
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
1,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1376653 Ontario Inc.
|
|
|
611 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1352537 Ontario Inc.
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tim Duncanson
|
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-G Investments Limited
|
|
|
16,357 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
16,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Serge Gouin
|
|
|
10,905 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
10,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian King
|
|
|
1,636 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
1,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.W.E. Mingo
|
|
|
1,091 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
1,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Prichard
|
|
|
5,453 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
5,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1299039 Ontario Inc.
|
|
|
1,091 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
1,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2668921 Manitoba Ltd.
|
|
|
3,272 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
3,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Onex Advisor III LLC
|
|
|
319,633 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
319,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CVS Partners, LP
|
|
|
19,133 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
19,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3062601 Nova Scotia Company
|
|
|
24,866 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
24,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hidden Creek Industries
|
|
|
54,849 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
54,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMON Canadian Investments Ltd.
|
|
|
2,484 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
2,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MHON Canadian Investments Ltd.
|
|
|
2,346 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
2,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Selling Stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baird Capital Partners III L.P.
|
|
|
701,153 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
701,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baird Capital Partners II L.P.
|
|
|
146,247 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
146,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BCP III Affiliates Fund L.P.
|
|
|
140,241 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
140,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially | |
|
|
Shares Beneficially Owned | |
|
|
|
Owned After the | |
|
|
Prior to the Offering | |
|
|
|
Offering | |
|
|
| |
|
Shares Being Sold | |
|
| |
Name of Beneficial Owner |
|
Number | |
|
Percentage | |
|
in the Offering | |
|
Number | |
|
Percentage | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
BCP III Special Affiliates L.P.
|
|
|
100,043 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
100,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BCP II Affiliates Fund L.P.
|
|
|
86,781 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
86,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.A. Johnson
|
|
|
128,392 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
78,392 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Mary-Louise R. Johnson Trust
|
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Szczepanski
|
|
|
1,069 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
1,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John C. Read
|
|
|
5,653 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
1,653 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Cleve S. Blunt
|
|
|
3,860 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
3,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James Lindsey
|
|
|
49,355 |
(1) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
9,242 |
|
|
|
40,093 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Frank Lolli
|
|
|
10,808 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
10,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chad M. Utrup
|
|
|
93,831 |
(2) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
28,149 |
|
|
|
65,682 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Mervin Dunn
|
|
|
309,966 |
(3) |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
92,990 |
|
|
|
216,976 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
James F. Williams
|
|
|
73,454 |
(4) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
22,036 |
|
|
|
51,418 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Randolph Street Partners II
|
|
|
41,953 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
41,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Averitt
|
|
|
75,037 |
(5) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
75,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gerald L. Armstrong
|
|
|
82,973 |
(6) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
24,892 |
|
|
|
58,081 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Donald P. Lorraine
|
|
|
72,133 |
(7) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
21,640 |
|
|
|
50,493 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Jeffrey Vogel
|
|
|
9,007 |
(8) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
6,007 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Patrick Turner
|
|
|
7,213 |
(9) |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
2,164 |
|
|
|
5,049 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
Denotes less than one percent. |
(1) Includes 45,113 shares issuable upon exercise of
currently exercisable management stock options, of which
Mr. Lindsey intends to exercise 5,000 in connection with
this offering.
(2) Includes 91,980 shares issuable upon exercise of
currently exercisable management stock options, of which
Mr. Utrup intends to exercise 26,298 in connection with
this offering.
(3) Includes 306,664 shares issuable upon exercise of
currently exercisable management stock options, of which
Mr. Dunn intends to exercise 89,688 in connection with this
offering.
(4) Includes 72,133 shares issuable upon exercise of
currently exercisable management stock options, of which
Mr. Williams intends to exercise 20,715 in connection with
this offering.
(5) Includes 72,133 shares issuable upon exercise of
currently exercisable management stock options, of which
Mr. Averitt intends to exercise 72,133 in connection with
this offering.
(6) Includes 82,973 shares issuable upon exercise of
currently exercisable management stock options, of which
Mr. Armstrong intends to exercise 24,892 in connection with
this offering.
(7) Includes 72,133 shares issuable upon exercise of
currently exercisable management stock options, of which
Mr. Lorraine intends to exercise 21,640 in connection with
this offering.
(8) Includes 9,007 shares issuable upon exercise of
currently exercisable management stock options, of which
Mr. Vogel intends to exercise 3,000 in connection with this
offering.
(9) Includes 7,213 shares issuable upon exercise of
currently exercisable management stock options, of which
Mr. Turner intends to exercise 2,164 in connection with
this offering.
93
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
General Matters
Our total amount of authorized capital stock is
30,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per
share, and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value
$.01 per share. As of April 27, 2005,
17,987,497 shares of common stock were issued and
outstanding and no shares of preferred stock were issued or
outstanding. The following summary of certain provisions of our
capital stock describes all material provisions of, but does not
purport to be complete and is subject to, and qualified in its
entirety by, our certificate of incorporation and by-laws and by
the provisions of applicable law.
Common Stock
All of our existing common stock is, and the shares of common
stock being offered by us in the offering will be, upon payment
therefor, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable. Set
forth below is a brief discussion of the principal terms of our
common stock.
Dividend Rights. Subject to preferences that may apply to
shares of preferred stock outstanding at the time, holders of
outstanding shares of common stock are entitled to receive
dividends out of assets legally available at the times and in
the amounts as the board of directors may from time to time
determine.
Voting Rights. Each outstanding share of common stock is
entitled to one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of
stockholders.
Preemptive or Similar Rights. Our common stock is not
entitled to preemptive or other similar subscription rights to
purchase any of our securities.
Conversion Rights. Our common stock is not convertible.
Right to Receive Liquidation Distributions. Upon our
liquidation, dissolution or winding up, the holders of our
common stock are entitled to receive pro rata our assets which
are legally available for distribution, after payment of all
debts and other liabilities and subject to the prior rights of
any holders of preferred stock then outstanding.
Nasdaq Listing. Our common stock is listed on The Nasdaq
National Market under the symbol CVGI.
Preferred Stock
Our board of directors may, without further action by our
stockholders, from time to time, direct the issuance of shares
of preferred stock in series and may, at the time of issuance,
determine the rights, preferences and limitations of each
series. Satisfaction of any dividend preferences of outstanding
shares of preferred stock would reduce the amount of funds
available for the payment of dividends on shares of our common
stock. Holders of shares of preferred stock may be entitled to
receive a preference payment in the event of our liquidation,
dissolution or winding-up before any payment is made to the
holders of shares of our common stock. Under specified
circumstances, the issuance of shares of preferred stock may
render more difficult or tend to discourage a merger, tender
offer or proxy contest, the assumption of control by a holder of
a large block of our securities or the removal of incumbent
management. Upon the affirmative vote of a majority of the total
number of directors then in office, the board of directors,
without stockholder approval, may issue shares of preferred
stock with voting and conversion rights which could adversely
affect the holders of shares of our common stock. Upon
consummation of this offering, there will be no shares of
preferred stock outstanding, and we have no present intention to
issue any shares of preferred stock.
94
Anti-takeover Effects of our Certificate of Incorporation and
By-laws
Our certificate of incorporation and by-laws contain certain
provisions that are intended to enhance the likelihood of
continuity and stability in the composition of the board of
directors and which may have the effect of delaying, deferring
or preventing a future takeover or change in control of the
company unless such takeover or change in control is approved by
the board of directors.
These provisions include:
Classified Board. Our certificate of incorporation
provides that our board of directors will be divided into three
classes of directors, with the classes as nearly equal in number
as possible. As a result, approximately one-third of our board
of directors will be elected each year. The classification of
directors has the effect of making it more difficult for
stockholders to change the composition of our board. Our
certificate of incorporation provides that, subject to any
rights of holders of preferred stock to elect additional
directors under specified circumstances, the number of directors
will be fixed in the manner provided in the by-laws. Our
certificate of incorporation and by-laws provide that the number
of directors will be fixed from time to time solely pursuant to
a resolution adopted by two-thirds of our directors then in
office. Upon completion of this offering, our board of directors
will have six members.
Action by Written Consent; Special Meetings of
Stockholders. Our certificate of incorporation provides that
stockholder action can be taken only at an annual or special
meeting of stockholders and cannot be taken by written consent
in lieu of a meeting. Our certificate of incorporation and
by-laws provide that, except as otherwise required by law,
special meetings of the stockholders can only be called by the
Chairman of the Board, or pursuant to a resolution adopted by a
majority of the Board of Directors. Stockholders are not be
permitted to call a special meeting or to require the board of
directors to call a special meeting.
Advance Notice Procedures. Our by-laws establish an
advance notice procedure for stockholder proposals to be brought
before an annual meeting of our stockholders, including proposed
nominations of persons for election to the board of directors.
Stockholders at an annual meeting are only able to consider
proposals or nominations specified in the notice of meeting or
brought before the meeting by or at the direction of the board
of directors or by a stockholder who was a stockholder of record
on the record date for the meeting, who is entitled to vote at
the meeting and who has given our Secretary timely written
notice, in proper form, of the stockholders intention to
bring that business before the meeting. Although the by-laws do
not give the board of directors the power to approve or
disapprove stockholder nominations of candidates or proposals
regarding other business to be conducted at a special or annual
meeting, the by-laws may have the effect of precluding the
conduct of certain business at a meeting if the proper
procedures are not followed or may discourage or deter a
potential acquiror from conducting a solicitation of proxies to
elect its own slate of directors or otherwise attempting to
obtain control of the company.
Super Majority Approval Requirements. The Delaware
General Corporation Law provides generally that the affirmative
vote of a majority of the shares entitled to vote on any matter
is required to amend a corporations certificate of
incorporation or by-laws, unless either a corporations
certificate of incorporation or by-laws require a greater
percentage. Our certificate of incorporation and by-laws provide
that the affirmative vote of holders of at least
662/3%
of the total votes eligible to be cast in the election of
directors is required to amend, alter, change or repeal
specified provisions. This requirement of a super-majority vote
to approve amendments to our certificate of incorporation and
by-laws could enable a minority of our stockholders to exercise
veto power over any such amendments.
Authorized but Unissued Shares. Our authorized but
unissued shares of common stock and preferred stock are
available for future issuance without stockholder approval.
These additional shares may be utilized for a variety of
corporate purposes, including future public offerings to raise
additional capital, corporate acquisitions and employee benefit
plans. The existence of authorized but unissued shares of common
stock and preferred stock could render more difficult or
discourage an attempt to obtain control of a majority of our
common stock by means of a proxy contest, tender offer, merger
or otherwise.
95
Anti-takeover Effects of Delaware Law
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law
provides that, subject to exceptions specified therein, an
interested stockholder of a Delaware corporation
shall not engage in any business combination,
including general mergers or consolidations or acquisitions of
additional shares of the corporation, with the corporation for a
three-year period following the time that such stockholder
becomes an interested stockholder unless:
|
|
|
|
|
prior to such time, the board of directors of the corporation
approved either the business combination or the transaction
which resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested
stockholder; |
|
|
|
upon consummation of the transaction which resulted in the
stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the
interested stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of
the corporation outstanding at the time the transaction
commenced (excluding specified shares); or |
|
|
|
on or subsequent to such time, the business combination is
approved by the board of directors of the corporation and
authorized at an annual or special meeting of stockholders, and
not by written consent, by the affirmative vote of at least
662/3%
of the outstanding voting stock not owned by the interested
stockholder. |
Under Section 203, the restrictions described above also do
not apply to specified business combinations proposed by an
interested stockholder following the announcement or
notification of one of such specified transactions involving the
corporation and a person who had not been an interested
stockholder during the previous three years or who became an
interested stockholder with the approval of a majority of the
corporations directors, if such transaction is approved or
not opposed by a majority of the directors who were directors
prior to any person becoming an interested stockholder during
the previous three years or were recommended for election or
elected to succeed such directors by a majority of such
directors.
Except as otherwise specified in Section 203, an
interested stockholder is defined to include:
|
|
|
|
|
any person that is the owner of 15% or more of the outstanding
voting stock of the corporation, or is an affiliate or associate
of the corporation and was the owner of 15% or more of the
outstanding voting stock of the corporation at any time within
three years immediately prior to the date of
determination; and |
|
|
|
the affiliates and associates of any such person. |
Under some circumstances, Section 203 makes it more
difficult for a person who is an interested stockholder to
effect various business combinations with a corporation for a
three-year period. We have not elected to be exempt from the
restrictions imposed under Section 203.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
Equiserve Trust Company, N.A. is the transfer agent and
registrar for our common stock.
96
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
We can make no predictions as to the effect, if any, that sales
of additional shares of common stock or the availability of
additional shares of common stock for sale will have on the
market price prevailing from time to time. Nevertheless, sales
of significant amounts of our common stock in the public market,
or the perception that such sales may occur, could adversely
affect prevailing market prices.
Sale of Restricted Shares
Upon completion of this offering, we will have
19,753,027 shares of common stock outstanding, assuming no
exercise of the underwriters over-allotment option. Of
these shares of common stock, the 10,284,500 shares issued
in our initial public offering, the 7,868,446 shares of
common stock being sold in this offering, plus any shares issued
upon exercise of the underwriters over-allotment option,
will be freely tradeable without restriction under the
Securities Act, except for any such shares which may be held or
acquired by an affiliate of ours, as that term is
defined in Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act,
which shares will be subject to the volume limitations and other
restrictions of Rule 144 described below. The remaining
shares of common stock held by our existing stockholders upon
completion of this offering will be restricted
securities, as that phrase is defined in Rule 144,
and may not be resold, in the absence of registration under the
Securities Act, except pursuant to an exemption from such
registration, including among others, the exemptions provided by
Rule 144, 144(k) or 701 under the Securities Act, which
rules are summarized below. Upon expiration of the lock-up
agreements described below, approximately 1.5 million
shares will be available for sale pursuant to Rules 144,
144(k) and 701.
Rule 144
In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, a person
or persons whose shares are aggregated, who has beneficially
owned restricted shares for at least one year, including persons
who may be deemed to be our affiliates, would be
entitled to sell within any three-month period a number of
shares that does not exceed the greater of:
|
|
|
|
|
1.0% of the number of shares of common stock then
outstanding; and |
|
|
|
the average weekly trading volume of our common stock during the
four calendar weeks before a notice of the sale on Form 144
is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to provisions
relating to notice, manner of sale and the availability of
current public information about us.
Rule 144(k)
Under Rule 144(k), a person who is not deemed to have been
one of our affiliates at any time during the
90 days preceding a sale, and who has beneficially owned
the shares proposed to be sold for at least two years, including
the holding period of any prior owner other than an
affiliate, is entitled to sell these shares without
complying with the manner of sale, public information, volume
limitation or notice provisions of Rule 144.
Rule 701
Securities issued in reliance on Rule 701 are also
restricted and may be sold by stockholders other than affiliates
of ours subject only to the manner of sale provisions of
Rule 144 and by affiliates under Rule 144 without
compliance with its one-year holding period requirement.
Options
We filed a registration statement on Form S-8 under the
Securities Act on May 3, 2005 registering approximately
1,910,869 shares of common stock reserved for issuance
under our Amended and Restated Equity Incentive Plan and
Management Stock Option Plan. Shares issued upon the exercise of
stock
97
options granted under these plans are eligible for resale in the
public market without restriction, subject to Rule 144
limitations applicable to affiliates and the lock-up agreements
described below.
Lock-Up Agreements
Notwithstanding the foregoing, our executive officers, directors
and the selling stockholders have agreed not to offer, sell,
contract to sell or otherwise dispose of any shares of our
common stock, subject to specified exceptions, for a period of
90 days after the date of this prospectus pursuant to
agreements with Credit Suisse First Boston LLC and Robert W.
Baird & Co. Incorporated, as representatives of the
underwriters. This lock-up period may be extended in certain
circumstances. See Underwriting.
Registration Rights
After the completion of this offering, the holders of
approximately 1.5 million shares of our common stock will
be entitled to certain rights with respect to the registration
of such shares under the Securities Act. See Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions Registration
Agreement.
98
MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
General
The following is a general discussion of the material United
States federal income and estate tax consequences of the
ownership and disposition of common stock that may be relevant
to you if you are a non-United States Holder. In general, a
non-United States Holder is any person or entity
that is, for United States federal income tax purposes, a
foreign corporation, a nonresident alien individual, a foreign
partnership or a foreign estate or trust. This discussion is
based on current law, which is subject to change, possibly with
retroactive effect, or different interpretations. This
discussion is limited to non-United States Holders who hold
shares of common stock as capital assets. Moreover, this
discussion is for general information only and does not address
all the tax consequences that may be relevant to you in light of
your personal circumstances, nor does it discuss special tax
provisions, which may apply to you if you relinquished United
States citizenship or residence.
If you are an individual, you may, in many cases, be deemed to
be a resident alien, as opposed to a nonresident alien, by
virtue of being present in the United States for at least
31 days in the calendar year and for an aggregate of at
least 183 days during a three-year period ending in the
current calendar year. For these purposes all the days present
in the current year, one-third of the days present in the
immediately preceding year, and one-sixth of the days present in
the second preceding year are counted. Resident aliens are
subject to United States federal income tax as if they were
United States citizens.
The tax treatment of a person who or that holds an interest in
an entity that is treated as a foreign partnership for United
States federal income tax purposes will generally depend upon
the status of such person or the activities of the entity.
Persons who or that hold an interest in such an entity should
consult their own tax advisors.
EACH PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER OF COMMON STOCK IS ADVISED TO CONSULT
A TAX ADVISOR WITH RESPECT TO CURRENT AND POSSIBLE FUTURE TAX
CONSEQUENCES OF PURCHASING, OWNING AND DISPOSING OF OUR COMMON
STOCK AS WELL AS ANY TAX CONSEQUENCES THAT MAY ARISE UNDER THE
LAWS OF ANY UNITED STATES STATE, MUNICIPALITY OR OTHER TAXING
JURISDICTION.
Dividends
If dividends are paid, as a non-United States Holder, you will
be subject to withholding of United States federal income tax at
a 30% rate or a lower rate as may be specified by an applicable
income tax treaty. To claim the benefit of a lower rate under an
income tax treaty, you must properly file with the payor an
Internal Revenue Service Form W-8BEN, or successor form,
claiming an exemption from or reduction in withholding under the
applicable tax treaty. In addition, where dividends are paid to
a non-United States Holder that is a partnership for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, persons holding an
interest in the entity may need to provide certification
claiming an exemption or reduction in withholding under the
applicable treaty.
If dividends are considered effectively connected with the
conduct of a trade or business by you within the United States
and, where a tax treaty applies, are attributable to a United
States permanent establishment of yours, those dividends will be
subject to United States federal income tax on a net basis at
applicable graduated individual or corporate rates but will not
be subject to withholding tax, provided an Internal Revenue
Service Form W-8ECI, or successor form, is filed with the
payor. If you are a foreign corporation, any effectively
connected dividends may, under certain circumstances, be subject
to an additional branch profits tax at a rate of 30%
or a lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax
treaty.
You must comply with the certification procedures described
above, or, in the case of payments made outside the United
States with respect to an offshore account, certain documentary
evidence procedures, directly or under certain circumstances
through an intermediary, to obtain the benefits of a reduced rate
99
under an income tax treaty with respect to dividends paid with
respect to your common stock. In addition, if you are required
to provide an Internal Revenue Service Form W-8ECI or
successor form, as discussed above, you must also provide your
tax identification number.
If you are eligible for a reduced rate of United States
withholding tax pursuant to an income tax treaty, you may obtain
a refund of any excess amounts withheld by filing an appropriate
claim for refund with the Internal Revenue Service.
Gain on Disposition of Common Stock
As a non-United States Holder, you generally will not be subject
to United States federal income tax on any gain recognized on
the sale or other disposition of common stock unless:
|
|
|
|
|
the gain is considered effectively connected with the conduct of
a trade or business by you within the United States and, where a
tax treaty applies, is attributable to a United States permanent
establishment of yours (and, in which case, if you are a foreign
corporation, you may be subject to an additional branch profits
tax equal to 30% or a lower rate as may be specified by an
applicable income tax treaty; |
|
|
|
you are an individual who holds the common stock as a capital
asset and are present in the United States for 183 or more days
in the taxable year of the sale or other disposition and other
conditions are met; or |
|
|
|
we are or become a United States Real Property Holding
Corporation (USRPHC). We believe that we are not
currently, and are not likely not to become, a USRPHC. If we
were to become a USRPHC, then gain on the sale or other
disposition of common stock by you generally would not be
subject to United States federal income tax provided: |
|
|
|
|
|
the common stock was regularly traded on an established
securities market; and |
|
|
|
you do not actually or constructively own more than 5% of the
common stock during the shorter of (i) the five-year period
preceding the disposition or (ii) your holding period. |
Federal Estate Tax
If you are an individual, common stock held at the time of your
death will be included in your gross estate for United States
federal estate tax purposes, and may be subject to United States
federal estate tax, unless an applicable estate tax treaty
provides otherwise.
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding Tax
We must report annually to the Internal Revenue Service and to
each of you the amount of dividends paid to you and the tax
withheld with respect to those dividends, regardless of whether
withholding was required. Copies of the information returns
reporting those dividends and withholding may also be made
available to the tax authorities in the country in which you
reside under the provisions of an applicable income tax treaty
or other applicable agreements.
Backup withholding is generally imposed at a rate currently not
to exceed 28% on certain payments to persons that fail to
furnish the necessary identifying information to the payor. You
generally will be subject to backup withholding tax with respect
to dividends paid on your common stock at a rate currently not
to exceed 28% unless you certify your non-United States status.
100
The payment of proceeds of a sale of common stock effected by or
through a United States office of a broker is subject to both
backup withholding and information reporting unless you provide
the payor with your name and address and you certify your
non-United States status or you otherwise establish an
exemption. In general, backup withholding and information
reporting will not apply to the payment of the proceeds of a
sale of common stock by or through a foreign office of a broker.
If, however, such broker is, for United States federal income
tax purposes, a United States person, a controlled foreign
corporation, a foreign person that derives 50% or more of its
gross income for certain periods from the conduct of a trade or
business in the United States or a foreign partnership that at
any time during its tax year either is engaged in the conduct of
a trade or business in the United States or has as partners one
or more United States persons that, in the aggregate, hold more
than 50% of the income or capital interest in the partnership,
backup withholding will not apply but such payments will be
subject to information reporting, unless such broker has
documentary evidence in its records that you are a non-United
States Holder and certain other conditions are met or you
otherwise establish an exemption.
Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules
generally will be allowed as a refund or a credit against your
United States federal income tax liability provided the required
information is furnished in a timely manner to the Internal
Revenue Service.
101
UNDERWRITING
Under the terms and subject to the conditions contained in an
underwriting agreement
dated ,
2005, we and the selling stockholders have agreed to sell to the
underwriters named below, for whom Credit Suisse First Boston
LLC and Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated are acting
as representatives, the following respective numbers of shares
of common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
Underwriter |
|
Shares | |
|
|
| |
Credit Suisse First Boston LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated
|
|
|
|
|
J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Lehman Brothers Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
7,868,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriting agreement provides that the underwriters are
obligated to purchase all the shares of common stock in this
offering if any are purchased, other than those shares covered
by the over-allotment option described below. The underwriting
agreement also provides that, if an underwriter defaults, the
purchase commitments of non-defaulting underwriters may be
increased or this offering may be terminated.
We have granted to the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase
on a pro rata basis up to 1,180,267 additional shares of
common stock from us at the public offering price less the
underwriting discounts and commissions. The option may be
exercised only to cover any over-allotments of common stock.
The underwriters propose to offer the shares of common stock at
the public offering price on the cover page of this prospectus
and to selling group members at that price less a selling
concession of
$ per
share. The underwriters and selling group members may allow a
discount of
$ per
share on sales to other broker/ dealers. After the public
offering, the representatives may change the public offering
price and concession and discount to broker/dealers.
The following table summarizes the compensation and estimated
expenses we and the selling stockholders will pay:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Without | |
|
With | |
|
Without | |
|
With | |
|
|
Over-allotment | |
|
Over-allotment | |
|
Over-allotment | |
|
Over-allotment | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Underwriting discounts and commissions paid by us
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Expenses payable by us
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Underwriting discounts and commissions paid by selling
stockholders
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
We have agreed pursuant to the terms of our registration
agreement to pay all of the expenses of the selling stockholders
in connection with this offering other than any underwriting
discounts and commissions.
We have agreed that we will not offer, sell, contract to sell,
pledge or otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly, or file
with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration
statement under the Securities Act relating to, any shares of
our common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable
or exercisable for any shares of our common stock, or publicly
disclose the intention to make any offer, sale, pledge,
disposition or filing, without the prior written consent of
Credit Suisse First Boston LLC and Robert W. Baird &
Co. Incorporated for a period of 90 days after the date of
this prospectus. However, in
102
the event that either (1) during the last 17 days of
the lock-up period, we release earnings results or
material news or a material event relating to us occurs or
(2) prior to the expiration of the lock-up
period, we announce that we will release earnings results during
the 16-day period beginning on the last day of the
lock-up period, then in either case the expiration
of the lock-up period will be extended until the
expiration of the 18-day period beginning on the date of release
of the earnings results or the occurrence of the material news
or material event, as applicable, unless Credit Suisse First
Boston LLC and Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated waive
such an extension.
Our executive officers, directors and the selling stockholders
have agreed that they will not offer, sell, contract to sell,
pledge or otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly, any
shares of our common stock or securities convertible into or
exchangeable or exercisable for any shares of our common stock,
enter into a transaction that would have the same effect, or
enter into any swap, hedge or other arrangement that transfers,
in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences of
ownership of our common stock, whether any of these transactions
are to be settled by delivery of our common stock or other
securities, in cash or otherwise, or publicly disclose the
intention to make any offer, sale, pledge or disposition, or to
enter into any transaction, swap, hedge or other arrangement,
without, in each case, the prior written consent of Credit
Suisse First Boston LLC and Robert W. Baird & Co.
Incorporated for a period of 90 days after the date of this
prospectus. However, in the event that either (1) during
the last 17 days of the lock-up period, we
release earnings results or material news or a material event
relating to us occurs or (2) prior to the expiration of the
lock-up period, we announce that we will release
earnings results during the 16-day period beginning on the last
day of the lock-up period, then in either case the
expiration of the lock-up period will be extended
until the expiration of the 18-day period beginning on the date
of release of the earnings results or the occurrence of the
material news or material event, as applicable, unless Credit
Suisse First Boston LLC and Robert W. Baird & Co.
Incorporated waive such an extension.
We and the selling stockholders have agreed to indemnify the
underwriters against liabilities under the Securities Act, or
contribute to payments that the underwriters may be required to
make in that respect. The selling stockholders may be deemed
underwriters within the meaning of
Section 2(11) of the Securities Act. Each of the selling
stockholders represented to us at the time of their respective
purchases of our common stock that such purchase was made for
investment purposes and not with a view towards distribution.
Our common stock is listed on The Nasdaq National Market under
the symbol CVGI.
Certain of the underwriters and their respective affiliates may
have from time to time performed and may in the future perform
various financial advisory, commercial banking and investment
banking services for us in the ordinary course of business, for
which they received or will receive customary fees. In addition,
affiliates of Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated will
be selling stockholders in this offering and intend to sell all
of the shares of our common stock currently held by them. See
Principal Stockholders and Selling
Stockholders. Accordingly, the offering is being made in
compliance with the requirements of Rule 2720 of the
Conduct Rules of the National Association of Securities Dealers,
Inc.
In connection with this offering the underwriters may engage in
stabilizing transactions, over-allotment transactions, syndicate
covering transactions, penalty bids and passive market making in
accordance with Regulation M under the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
Stabilizing transactions permit bids to purchase the underlying
security so long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a
specified maximum. |
|
|
|
Over-allotment involves sales by the underwriters of shares in
excess of the number of shares the underwriters are obligated to
purchase, which creates a syndicate short position. The short
position may be either a covered short position or a naked short
position. In a covered short position, the number of shares
over-allotted by the underwriters is not greater than the number
of shares that they may purchase in the over-allotment option.
In a naked short position, the number of shares involved is
greater than the number of shares in the over-allotment option.
The underwriters may |
103
|
|
|
|
|
close out any covered short position by either exercising their
over-allotment option and/or purchasing shares in the open
market. |
|
|
|
Syndicate covering transactions involve purchases of the common
stock in the open market after the distribution has been
completed in order to cover syndicate short positions. In
determining the source of shares to close out the short
position, the underwriters will consider, among other things,
the price of shares available for purchase in the open market as
compared to the price at which they may purchase shares through
the over-allotment option. If the underwriters sell more shares
than could be covered by the over- allotment option, a naked
short position, the position can only be closed out by buying
shares in the open market. A naked short position is more likely
to be created if the underwriters are concerned that there could
be downward pressure on the price of the shares in the open
market after pricing that could adversely affect investors who
purchase in the offering. |
|
|
|
Penalty bids permit the representatives to reclaim a selling
concession from a syndicate member when the common stock
originally sold by the syndicate member is purchased in a
stabilizing or syndicate covering transaction to cover syndicate
short positions. |
|
|
|
In passive market making, market makers in the common stock who
are underwriters or prospective underwriters may, subject to
limitations, make bids for or purchases of our common stock
until the time, if any, at which a stabilizing bid is made. |
These stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions
and penalty bids may have the effect of raising or maintaining
the market price of our common stock or preventing or retarding
a decline in the market price of our common stock. As a result
the price of our common stock may be higher than the price that
might otherwise exist in the open market. These transactions may
be effected on The Nasdaq National Market or otherwise and, if
commenced, may be discontinued at any time.
A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on the
web sites maintained by one or more of the underwriters, or
selling group members, if any, participating in this offering,
and one or more of the underwriters participating in this
offering may distribute prospectuses electronically. The
representative may agree to allocate a number of shares to
underwriters and selling group members for sale to their online
brokerage account holders. Internet distributions will be
allocated by the underwriters and selling group members that
will make internet distributions on the same basis as other
allocations.
104
LEGAL MATTERS
The validity of the common stock offered hereby will be passed
upon for us by Kirkland & Ellis LLP (a partnership that
includes professional corporations), Chicago, Illinois. Certain
partners of Kirkland & Ellis LLP are partners in
Randolph Street Partners, which owns 41,953 shares of
common stock, and will be a selling stockholder in this
offering. Kirkland & Ellis LLP has provided legal
services to us and to Hidden Creek Partners from time to time
and may continue to do so in the future. The underwriters have
been represented by Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, New
York, New York.
EXPERTS
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.s consolidated financial
statements as of December 31, 2003 and 2004 and for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004
included in this prospectus and the related financial statement
schedule included elsewhere in the registration statement of
which this prospectus forms a part, have been audited by
Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their reports appearing herein and
elsewhere in such registration statement (which reports express
an unqualified opinion and include an explanatory paragraph
regarding the adoption of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets), and have been so included in
reliance upon the reports of such firm given upon their
authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Mayflower as of
December 31, 2003 and for each of the two years in the
period ended December 31, 2003 included in this prospectus
and related financial statement schedule elsewhere in the
registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part,
have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent
auditors, as stated in their reports appearing herein and
elsewhere in the registration statement, and have been so
included in reliance upon the reports of such firm given upon
their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Mayflower as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2004 included in this
prospectus filed as Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1 have
been included in reliance on the report of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent auditors, given on the
authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-1 under the Securities Act with respect to the
shares to be sold in this offering. This prospectus does not
contain all of the information set forth in the registration
statement, certain parts of which are omitted in accordance with
the rules and regulations of the SEC. For further information
about us and the shares to be sold in this offering, please
refer to the registration statement. Statements contained in
this prospectus as to the contents of any contract, agreement or
other document referred to, are not necessarily complete, and in
each instance please refer to the copy of the contract,
agreement or other document filed as an exhibit to the
registration statement, each statement being qualified in all
respects by this reference.
We are subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange
Act, and file annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy
statements and other information with the SEC. You may read and
copy these reports, proxy statements and other information at
the SECs public reference room at Room 1024,
450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. You can
request copies of these documents by writing to the SEC and
paying a fee for the copying cost. Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330 for more information about the operation of the
public reference room. The SEC maintains a web site at
http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, statements
and other information regarding registrants that file
electronically. You may also obtain additional information about
us from our web site, which is located at www.cvgrp.com. Our
website provides access to filings made by us through the
SECs EDGAR filing system, including our annual, quarterly
and current reports filed on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K,
respectively, and ownership reports filed on Forms 3, 4 and
5 by our directors, executive officers and beneficial owners of
more than 10% of our outstanding common stock. Information
contained in our website is not incorporated by reference in,
and should not be considered a part of, this prospectus.
105
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. Consolidated Financial
Statements
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements for the three months
ended March 31, 2004 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2 |
|
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-14 |
|
|
|
|
F-15 |
|
|
|
|
F-16 |
|
|
|
|
F-17 |
|
|
|
|
F-18 |
|
|
|
|
F-19 |
|
|
|
|
F-37 |
|
Schedule II: Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
|
|
|
F-38 |
|
Mayflower Vehicle Systems Consolidated Financial
Statements
|
|
|
|
|
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-39 |
|
|
|
|
F-40 |
|
|
|
|
F-41 |
|
|
|
|
F-42 |
|
|
|
|
F-43 |
|
|
|
|
F-44 |
|
|
|
|
F-45 |
|
F-1
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in | |
|
|
thousands | |
|
|
unaudited) | |
ASSETS |
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
1,527 |
|
|
Accounts receivable net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $3,561 and $2,681
|
|
|
102,913 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
52,129 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
7,027 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
7,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
170,634 |
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT Net
|
|
|
68,359 |
|
GOODWILL
|
|
|
145,100 |
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
6,516 |
|
OTHER ASSETS Net
|
|
|
7,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
397,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT |
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
$ |
16,251 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
67,679 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
38,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
122,649 |
|
LONG-TERM DEBT Net
|
|
|
137,234 |
|
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
|
|
|
17,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
277,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Notes 4, 8, 9, and 10)
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share; 30,000,000 shares
authorized; 17,987,497 shares outstanding
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
123,660 |
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(4,568 |
) |
|
Stock subscriptions receivable
|
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
1,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders investment
|
|
|
120,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
397,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
F-2
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in | |
|
|
thousands, except per | |
|
|
share amounts | |
|
|
unaudited) | |
REVENUES
|
|
$ |
152,415 |
|
|
$ |
85,990 |
|
COST OF SALES
|
|
|
126,163 |
|
|
|
70,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
26,252 |
|
|
|
15,487 |
|
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
|
|
|
9,549 |
|
|
|
7,497 |
|
AMORTIZATION EXPENSE
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
16,679 |
|
|
|
7,954 |
|
OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE
|
|
|
(2,881 |
) |
|
|
(3,270 |
) |
INTEREST EXPENSE
|
|
|
2,168 |
|
|
|
2,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
17,392 |
|
|
|
8,956 |
|
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
6,506 |
|
|
|
3,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
$ |
10,886 |
|
|
$ |
5,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
F-3
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) | |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
10,886 |
|
|
$ |
5,549 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,762 |
|
|
|
2,060 |
|
|
|
Noncash amortization of debt financing costs
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
1,120 |
|
|
|
1,307 |
|
|
|
Loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
Noncash gain on forward exchange contracts
|
|
|
(2,872 |
) |
|
|
(3,270 |
) |
|
|
Noncash interest expense on subordinated debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
Change in other operating items
|
|
|
(2,033 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
10,058 |
|
|
|
6,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(2,883 |
) |
|
|
(840 |
) |
|
Payment for asset acquisition Net
|
|
|
(106,358 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(109,241 |
) |
|
|
(840 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under revolving credit facility
|
|
|
27,551 |
|
|
|
20,509 |
|
|
Repayments of revolving credit facility
|
|
|
(26,165 |
) |
|
|
(20,925 |
) |
|
Borrowings under long-term debt
|
|
|
102,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(3,877 |
) |
|
|
(7,247 |
) |
|
Other Net
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
99,965 |
|
|
|
(7,667 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
(651 |
) |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
(2,392 |
) |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS Beginning of period
|
|
|
1,396 |
|
|
|
3,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS End of period
|
|
$ |
1,527 |
|
|
$ |
1,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$ |
2,074 |
|
|
$ |
1,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid (refunded) for income taxes Net
|
|
$ |
1,513 |
|
|
$ |
(62 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
F-4
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. Basis of Presentation
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries (CVG
or the Company) (formerly Bostrom Holding, Inc., a
Delaware corporation) designs and manufactures seats and seat
systems, interior trim systems (including instrument panels,
door panels, headliners, cabinetry and floor systems), cab
structures and sleeper boxes, mirrors, wiper systems and
controls for the global commercial vehicle market, including the
heavy-duty truck market, the construction market and the
specialty and military transportation markets. The Company has
operations located in Indiana, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon,
Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington, Australia, Belgium,
China, Sweden and the United Kingdom.
The Company has prepared the condensed consolidated financial
statements of CVG without audit, pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC). The information furnished in the condensed
consolidated financial statements includes normal recurring
adjustments and reflects all adjustments which are, in our
opinion, necessary for a fair presentation of the results of
operations and statements of financial position for the interim
periods presented. Certain information and footnote disclosures
normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to
such rules and regulations. We believe that the disclosures are
adequate to make the information presented not misleading when
read in conjunction with our fiscal 2004 consolidated financial
statements and the notes thereto as filed with the SEC. Unless
otherwise indicated, all amounts are in thousands except per
share amounts.
Revenues and operating results for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of the
results to be expected for the full year.
The Company was formed on August 22, 2000. On
October 6, 2000, the Company acquired the assets of Bostrom
plc in exchange for $83.6 million in cash and assumption of
certain liabilities (the Acquisition). The source of
the cash consisted of $49.8 million of debt and
$33.8 million of equity. The Company had no operations
prior to October 6, 2000.
The Acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting. Accordingly, the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed by the Company were recorded at fair value as of the
date of the Acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over
the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed
has been recorded as goodwill.
On March 28, 2003, the Company and Commercial Vehicle
Systems Holdings, Inc. (CVS) entered into an
Agreement and Plan of Merger whereby a subsidiary of the Company
was merged into CVS. The holders of the outstanding shares of
CVS received, in exchange, shares of the Company on a
one-for-one basis resulting in the issuance of 4,870,228 shares
of common stock. On May 20, 2004, the Company and Trim
Systems, Inc. (Trim) entered into an Agreement and
Plan of Merger whereby a subsidiary of the Company was merged
into Trim. On August 2, 2004, the Trim merger was effected
(the CVS and Trim mergers are collectively referred to as the
Mergers). The holders of the outstanding shares of
Trim received, in exchange, shares of the Company on a
.099-for-one basis resulting in the issuance of 2,769,567 shares
of common stock. In accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141, the
Mergers were accounted for as a combination of entities under
common control. Thus, the accounts of CVS, Trim, and the Company
were combined based upon their respective historical bases of
accounting. The financial statements reflect the combined
results of the Company, CVS and Trim as if the Mergers had
occurred as of the beginning of the earliest period presented.
On August 4, 2004, the Company reclassified all of its
existing classes of common stock into one class of common stock
and in connection therewith effected a 38.991-to-one stock
split. The stock split has been reflected as of the beginning of
all periods presented.
F-5
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
On August 10, 2004, the Company completed its initial
public offering of common stock at a price of $13.00 per share.
Of the total shares offered, 3,125,000 were sold by the Company
and 6,125,000 were sold by certain selling stockholders. Net
proceeds to the Company of approximately $34.6 million were
used to repay outstanding indebtedness.
On August 23, 2004, the underwriters, pursuant to their
overallotment option, purchased an additional 1,034,500 shares
of common stock resulting in net proceeds of approximately
$12.6 million to the Company, which was used to further
reduce outstanding indebtedness and for general corporate
purposes.
2. Acquisitions and Pro Forma
Financial Information
On February 7, 2005, CVG acquired substantially all of the
assets and liabilities related to Mayflower Vehicle
Systems North American Commercial Vehicle Operations
(MVS or Mayflower) for cash
consideration of $107.5 million. MVS, whose products
include cab frames and assemblies, sleeper boxes and other
structural components, is the only non-captive producer of
complete steel and aluminum truck cabs for the commercial
vehicle sector with full service engineering and development
capabilities. MVS serves the North American commercial vehicle
sector from three manufacturing locations in Norwalk, Ohio,
Shadyside, Ohio and Kings Mountain, North Carolina. For the year
ended December 31, 2004, Mayflower recorded revenues of
approximately $207 million and operating income of
approximately $22 million. Financing for the acquisition
consisted of an increase and amendment to the Companys
senior credit facility.
The Mayflower acquisition will be accounted for by the purchase
method of accounting. Under purchase accounting, the total
purchase price will be allocated to the tangible and intangible
assets and liabilities of Mayflower based upon their respective
fair values. This allocation will be based upon valuations and
other studies that have not yet been completed. A preliminary
allocation of the purchase price has been made to major
categories of assets and liabilities based on available
information. The actual allocation of purchase price and the
resulting effect on income from operations may differ
significantly from the pro forma amounts included herein.
The purchase price and costs associated with the acquisition
exceeded the preliminary fair value of the net assets acquired
by approximately $59.1 million. Pending completion of an
independent valuation analysis, we have preliminarily allocated
the excess purchase price over the fair value of the net assets
acquired to goodwill. Our preliminary estimate of goodwill as of
the acquisition date, which is subject to further refinement, is
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price
|
|
$ |
107,500 |
|
Working capital and other adjustments
|
|
|
(4,920 |
) |
Transaction costs
|
|
|
3,742 |
|
Net assets of Mayflower at historical cost
|
|
|
(47,184 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Excess of purchase price over net assets acquired
|
|
$ |
59,138 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
The following unaudited pro forma financial information for the
three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 represents the
combined results of the Companys operations and MVS as if
the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of each of the
periods presented. The unaudited pro forma financial information
is for informational purposes only and should not be considered
indicative of actual results that would have been achieved had
the transaction described above actually been completed at the
beginning of the periods presented, nor does it purport to
represent the results of operations for future periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
176,401 |
|
|
$ |
128,758 |
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
11,403 |
|
|
$ |
6,945 |
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of first-in, first-out
(FIFO) cost or market. Cost includes applicable
material, labor and overhead. Inventories consisted of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
Raw materials
|
|
$ |
33,976 |
|
Work in process
|
|
|
10,330 |
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
7,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
52,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory quantities on-hand are regularly reviewed, and where
necessary, provisions for excess and obsolete inventory are
recorded based primarily on the Companys estimated
production requirements driven by current market volumes. Excess
and obsolete provisions may vary by product depending upon
future potential use of the product.
4. Stockholders
Investment
Common Stock The authorized common stock of
the Company consists of 30,000,000 shares of common stock with a
par value of $0.01 per share, with 17,987,497 shares outstanding
at December 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005. In August
2004, the Company reclassified all of its existing classes of
common stock and performed a 38.991-to-one stock split. The
stock split has been reflected in the share and per share
amounts for all periods presented.
Preferred Stock The authorized preferred
stock of the Company consists of 5,000,000 shares of preferred
stock with a par value of $0.01 per share, with no shares
outstanding at December 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005.
Earnings Per Share Basic earnings per share
was computed by dividing net income by the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during the quarter in
accordance with SFAS No. 128.
F-7
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
Diluted earnings per share for the quarter ended March 31,
2005 includes the effects of outstanding stock options and
warrants using the treasury stock method.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Net income applicable to common stockholders basic and
diluted
|
|
$ |
10,886 |
|
|
$ |
5,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
17,987 |
|
|
|
13,779 |
|
Dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and warrants after
application of the treasury stock method
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted shares outstanding
|
|
|
18,297 |
|
|
|
13,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options and Warrants In 1998, the
Company issued options to purchase 57,902 shares of common stock
at $9.43 per share, which are exercisable through December 2008,
in connection with an acquisition. None of the initially granted
options have been exercised as of March 31, 2005. The
options were granted at an exercise price determined to be at or
above fair value on the date of grant. In addition, the Company
had outstanding warrants to purchase 136,023 shares of common
stock at $3.42 per share, which were exercised in conjunction
with the Companys initial public offering in August 2004.
In May 2004, the Company granted options to purchase 910,869
shares of common stock at $5.54 per share. Initially, these
options had a ten year term, with 50% of such options becoming
immediately exercisable and the remaining 50% becoming
exercisable ratably on June 30, 2005 and June 30,
2006. During June 2004, the Company modified the terms of these
options to be 100% vested immediately. The Company recorded a
noncash compensation charge of $10.1 million, equal to the
difference between $5.54 and the estimated fair market value.
In October 2004, the Company granted options to purchase 598,950
shares of common stock at $15.84 per share. The options were
granted at an exercise price determined to be at or above fair
value on the date of grant. These options have a 10 year
life and vest equally in annual increments over a 3 year
period. Had compensation cost for these plans been determined as
required under SFAS No. 123, the impact to 2005 net
income would have been approximately $0.2 million and basic
and diluted earnings per share would remain unchanged.
Repurchase of Common Stock During 2004, the
Company repurchased 50,874 shares of common stock from certain
stockholders at an average price of $4.78 per share.
Dividends The Company has not declared or
paid any cash dividends in the past. The Companys credit
agreement prohibits the payment of cash dividends.
F-8
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
5. Debt
Debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
Revolving credit facilities, bore interest at a weighted average
rate of 6.7% as of March 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
5,851 |
|
Term loans, with principal and interest payable quarterly, bore
interest at a weighted average rate of 6.6% as of March 31,
2005
|
|
|
141,132 |
|
Other
|
|
|
6,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153,485 |
|
Less current maturities
|
|
|
16,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
137,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Agreement In connection with the
acquisition of Mayflower, the Company amended its existing
senior credit facility, to increase the revolving credit
facility from $40.0 million to $75.0 million and the
term loans from $65.0 million to $145.0 million. The
revolving credit facility is available until January 31,
2010 and the term loans are due and payable on December 31,
2010. Borrowings bear interest at various rates plus a margin
based on certain financial ratios of the Company. The senior
credit agreement contains various restrictive covenants,
including limiting indebtedness, rental obligations, investments
and cash dividends, and also requires the maintenance of certain
financial ratios, including fixed charge coverage and funded
debt to EBITDA. Compliance with respect to these covenants as of
March 31, 2005 was achieved. Borrowings under the senior
credit facility are secured by specifically identified assets of
the Company, comprising, in total, substantially all assets of
the Company. In addition, at March 31, 2005 the Company had
outstanding letters of credit of approximately $3.3 million
expiring through 2009.
The credit facility provides the Company with the ability to
denominate a portion of its borrowings in foreign currencies. As
of March 31, 2005, $2.5 million of the revolving
credit facility borrowings and $128.6 million of the term
loans were denominated in U.S. dollars and $3.3 million of
the revolving credit facility borrowings and $12.5 million
of the term loans were denominated in British pounds sterling.
6. Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of acquisition purchase price
over the fair value of net assets acquired, which prior to the
adoption on January 1, 2002, of SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Intangible Assets, was being amortized on a
straight-line basis over 40 years. In July 2001, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, and
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Intangible Assets.
SFAS No. 141 requires all business combinations
initiated after June 30, 2001 to be accounted for using the
purchase method of accounting. Under SFAS No. 142,
goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are no
longer amortized, but reviewed annually, or more frequently if
impairment indicators arise. Separable intangible assets that
are not deemed to have indefinite lives will continue to be
amortized over their useful lives, but with no maximum life.
The Company performs impairment tests annually during the second
quarter and whenever events or circumstances occur indicating
that goodwill might be impaired. During the three months ended
March 31, 2005, the Company reduced goodwill by
$0.6 million due to currency translation adjustments.
F-9
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
7. Comprehensive Income
The Company follows the provisions of SFAS No. 130,
Reporting Comprehensive Income, which established
standards for reporting and display of comprehensive income and
its components. Comprehensive income reflects the change in
equity of a business enterprise during a period from
transactions and other events and circumstances from nonowner
sources. For the Company, comprehensive income
(loss) represents net income (loss) adjusted for
foreign currency translation adjustments and minimum pension
liability. In accordance with SFAS No. 130, the
Company has chosen to disclose comprehensive income
(loss) in stockholders investment. The components of
accumulated other comprehensive income consisted of the
following as of March 31, 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
$ |
4,171 |
|
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
(2,898 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31 is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Net income
|
|
$ |
10,886 |
|
|
$ |
5,549 |
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
(1,057 |
) |
|
|
272 |
|
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment
|
|
|
(505 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
9,324 |
|
|
$ |
5,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Commitments and
Contingencies
Warranty The Company is subject to warranty
claims for products that fail to perform as expected due to
design or manufacturing deficiencies. Customers continue to
require their outside suppliers to guarantee or warrant their
products and bear the cost of repair or replacement of such
products. Depending on the terms under which the Company
supplies products to its customers, a customer may hold the
Company responsible for some or all of the repair or replacement
costs of defective products when the product supplied did not
perform as represented. The Companys policy is to reserve
for estimated future customer warranty costs based on historical
trends and current economic factors. The following represents a
summary of the warranty provision for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Beginning of period
|
|
$ |
2,408 |
|
|
Increase due to acquisitions
|
|
|
3,194 |
|
|
Additional provisions recorded
|
|
|
654 |
|
|
Deduction for payments made
|
|
|
(458 |
) |
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance End of period
|
|
$ |
5,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Forward Exchange Contracts
The Company uses forward exchange contracts to hedge certain of
the foreign currency transaction exposures of its United Kingdom
operations. The Company estimates its projected revenues and
purchases in certain foreign currencies or locations, and will
hedge a portion or all of the anticipated long or short
position. The contracts typically run from three
F-10
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
months up to three years. These contracts are marked-to-market
and the fair value is included in assets (liabilities) in
the consolidated balance sheets, with the offsetting noncash
gain or loss included in the consolidated statements of
operations. The Company does not hold or issue foreign exchange
options or forward contracts for trading purposes. The following
table summarizes the notional amount of the Companys open
foreign exchange contracts at March 31, 2005 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Local | |
|
|
|
U.S. $ | |
|
|
Currency | |
|
U.S. $ | |
|
Equivalent | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Equivalent | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Commitments to sell currencies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Eurodollar
|
|
|
48,280 |
|
|
|
64,442 |
|
|
|
64,344 |
|
|
Swedish krona
|
|
|
16,250 |
|
|
|
2,362 |
|
|
|
2,319 |
|
|
Japanese yen
|
|
|
4,150,000 |
|
|
|
44,639 |
|
|
|
41,410 |
|
|
Australian dollar
|
|
|
4,500 |
|
|
|
3,435 |
|
|
|
3,458 |
|
The difference between the U.S. $ equivalent and U.S. $
equivalent fair value of approximately $3.3 million is
included in other assets in the condensed consolidated balance
sheet at March 31, 2005.
Litigation The Company is subject to various
legal actions and claims incidental to its business, including
those arising out of alleged defects, product warranties,
employment-related matters and environmental matters. Management
believes that the Company maintains adequate insurance to cover
these claims. The Company has established reserves for issues
that are probable and estimable in amounts management believes
are adequate to cover reasonable adverse judgments not covered
by insurance. Based upon the information available to management
and discussions with legal counsel, it is the opinion of
management that the ultimate outcome of the various legal
actions and claims that are incidental to the Companys
business will not have a material adverse impact on the
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows of the Company; however, such matters are subject to many
uncertainties, and the outcomes of individual matters are not
predictable with assurance.
9. Defined Benefit Plan and
Postretirement Benefits
The Company sponsors defined benefit plans that covers certain
hourly and salaried employees in the United States and United
Kingdom. The Companys policy is to make annual
contributions to the plan to fund the normal cost as required by
local regulations. In addition, the Company has postretirement
medical benefit plan for certain retirees and their dependents
of the U.S. operations, and has recorded a liability for its
estimated obligation under this plan. The impact of the
postretirement medical benefit plan was not significant as of
and for the three months ended March 31, 2005.
F-11
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
The components of net periodic benefit cost related to the
defined benefit plan is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension Plans | |
|
U.K. Pension Plans | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Service cost
|
|
$ |
222 |
|
|
$ |
352 |
|
|
$ |
271 |
|
|
$ |
302 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
(397 |
) |
|
|
(529 |
) |
|
|
(449 |
) |
Recognized actuarial loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$ |
227 |
|
|
$ |
433 |
|
|
$ |
348 |
|
|
$ |
365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We previously disclosed in our financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2004, that we expected to contribute
$1.1 million to our pension plans in 2005. Inclusive of the
Mayflower acquisition, on a pro forma basis, we would have
expected to contribute $2.2 million. As of March 31,
2005, $0.4 million of contributions have been made to the
pension plans. We anticipate contributing an additional
$1.8 million to our pension plans in 2005 for total
estimated contributions during 2005 of $2.2 million.
10. Related Party
Transactions
The following related party transactions occurred during the
three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
The Company made payments of $0.4 million to Hidden Creek
Industries, a private industrial management company that is a
partnership controlled by Onex, for financing and
acquisition-related services for the three months ended
March 31, 2004. These services are included in selling,
general and administrative expenses in the consolidated
statements of operations. As of March 31, 2005, Onex
controlled 26% of the outstanding voting shares of the Company. |
|
|
|
In January 2005, the Company entered into an advisory agreement
with Hidden Creek Partners LLC. Hidden Creek Partners is a newly
formed advisory firm that is controlled by former principals of
Hidden Creek Industries but is otherwise not affiliated with
Onex or the Company. This advisory agreement replaces the
management agreement with Hidden Creek Industries. The services
to be provided pursuant to the advisory agreement include
assistance with financing activities, strategic initiatives and
acquisitions. The Company did not make any payments to Hidden
Creek Partners during the three months ended March 31, 2005. |
|
|
|
In May 2004, the Company entered in a Product Sourcing
Assistance Agreement with Baird Asia Limited. Pursuant to the
agreement, Baird Asia Limited will assist us in procuring
materials and parts from Asia. For the three months ended
March 31, 2005, the Company made payment of approximately
$676,000 to Baird Asia Limited under this agreement. Of this
amount, approximately $60,000 was retained by Baird Asia Limited
as its commission under the Product Sourcing Assistance
Agreement. |
11. Subsequent Events
On June 3, 2005, the Company acquired all of the stock of
Monona Corporation, the parent of Monona Wire Corporation
(MWC), for $55.0 million, and MWC became a
wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. The MWC acquisition was
funded through an increase and amendment to the Companys
F-12
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED) (Continued)
senior credit facility. MWC is a leading manufacturer of
complex, electronic wire harnesses and related assemblies used
in the global heavy equipment and specialty and military vehicle
markets. It also produces panel assemblies for commercial
equipment markets and cab frame assemblies for Caterpillar.
MWCs wire harness assemblies are critical, complex
products that are the primary electrical current carrying
devices within vehicle systems. MWC offers approximately 4,500
different wire harness assemblies for its customers, which
include leading OEMs such as Caterpillar, Deere & Co. and
Oshkosh Truck. MWC operates from primary manufacturing
operations in the U.S. and Mexico, and we believe it is cost
competitive on a global basis. The MWC acquisition enhances our
ability to offer comprehensive cab systems to our customers,
expands our electronic assembly capabilities, adds Mexico
manufacturing capabilities, and offers significant cross-selling
opportunities over a more diversified base of customers. For the
fiscal year ended January 31, 2005, MWC recorded revenues
of approximately $85.5 million and operating income of
approximately $9.6 million.
F-13
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Commercial Vehicle
Group, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the
Company) (formerly Bostrom Holding, Inc., a Delaware
corporation) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the
related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders investment, and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2004. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2003 and 2004 and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements, effective January 1, 2002, the Company changed
its method of accounting for goodwill and other intangible
assets.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 3, 2005
F-14
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2003 and 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
|
|
(except share amounts) | |
ASSETS |
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
3,486 |
|
|
$ |
1,396 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of reserve for doubtful accounts of
$2,530 and $2,681, respectively
|
|
|
40,211 |
|
|
|
46,267 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
29,667 |
|
|
|
36,936 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
3,754 |
|
|
|
6,081 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
5,995 |
|
|
|
8,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
83,113 |
|
|
|
98,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and buildings
|
|
|
15,075 |
|
|
|
12,949 |
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
56,697 |
|
|
|
64,205 |
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
|
|
3,764 |
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(39,742 |
) |
|
|
(47,953 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment net
|
|
|
33,492 |
|
|
|
32,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GOODWILL
|
|
|
82,872 |
|
|
|
84,715 |
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
9,011 |
|
|
|
5,901 |
|
OTHER ASSETS, net of accumulated amortization of $1,098 and
$328, respectively
|
|
|
2,007 |
|
|
|
3,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
210,495 |
|
|
$ |
225,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT |
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
$ |
15,231 |
|
|
$ |
4,884 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
23,310 |
|
|
|
33,846 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
16,356 |
|
|
|
18,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
54,897 |
|
|
|
57,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM DEBT, net of current maturities
|
|
|
101,204 |
|
|
|
49,041 |
|
SUBORDINATED DEBT DUE TO RELATED PARTIES
|
|
|
11,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
|
|
|
8,549 |
|
|
|
8,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
175,689 |
|
|
|
114,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Notes 4, 8,
10, 11, and 12)
STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $.01 par value; 30,000,000 shares
authorized; 17,987,497 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
76,803 |
|
|
|
123,660 |
|
|
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)
|
|
|
(43,028 |
) |
|
|
(15,454 |
) |
|
Stock subscription receivable
|
|
|
(430 |
) |
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
1,323 |
|
|
|
2,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders investment
|
|
|
34,806 |
|
|
|
111,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
210,495 |
|
|
$ |
225,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-15
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
REVENUES
|
|
$ |
298,678 |
|
|
$ |
287,579 |
|
|
$ |
380,445 |
|
COST OF SALES
|
|
|
249,181 |
|
|
|
237,884 |
|
|
|
309,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
49,497 |
|
|
|
49,695 |
|
|
|
70,749 |
|
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
|
|
|
23,952 |
|
|
|
24,281 |
|
|
|
28,985 |
|
NONCASH OPTION ISSUANCE CHARGE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,125 |
|
AMORTIZATION EXPENSE
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
25,423 |
|
|
|
25,229 |
|
|
|
31,532 |
|
(GAIN) LOSS ON FOREIGN CURRENCY FORWARD EXCHANGE CONTRACTS
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
3,230 |
|
|
|
(1,247 |
) |
INTEREST EXPENSE
|
|
|
12,940 |
|
|
|
9,796 |
|
|
|
7,244 |
|
LOSS ON EARLY EXTINGUISHMENT OF DEBT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,972 |
|
|
|
1,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes and cumulative effect
of change in accounting
|
|
|
11,385 |
|
|
|
9,231 |
|
|
|
23,930 |
|
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
5,235 |
|
|
|
5,267 |
|
|
|
6,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting
|
|
|
6,150 |
|
|
|
3,964 |
|
|
|
17,449 |
|
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING
|
|
|
(51,630 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
$ |
(45,480 |
) |
|
$ |
3,964 |
|
|
$ |
17,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before cumulative effect of change in accounting
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
|
|
|
(3.74 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(3.29 |
) |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before cumulative effect of change in accounting
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
1.12 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
|
|
|
(3.70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(3.26 |
) |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
1.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-16
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained | |
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
Common Stock | |
|
Stock | |
|
Additional | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Subscription | |
|
Paid-In | |
|
(Accumulated | |
|
Income | |
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Amount | |
|
Receivable | |
|
Capital | |
|
Deficit) | |
|
(Loss) | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except share data) | |
BALANCE December 31, 2001
|
|
|
13,843,286 |
|
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
$ |
(691 |
) |
|
$ |
77,010 |
|
|
$ |
(1,512 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,032 |
) |
|
$ |
72,913 |
|
|
Repurchase of common stock net
|
|
|
(64,687 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,480 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,318 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,942 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE December 31, 2002
|
|
|
13,778,599 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
(430 |
) |
|
|
76,803 |
|
|
|
(46,992 |
) |
|
|
(2,494 |
) |
|
|
27,025 |
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE December 31, 2003
|
|
|
13,778,599 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
(430 |
) |
|
|
76,803 |
|
|
|
(43,028 |
) |
|
|
1,323 |
|
|
|
34,806 |
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
4,259,772 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,899 |
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(50,874 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
Stock options issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,125 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(544 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE December 31, 2004
|
|
|
17,987,497 |
|
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
(175 |
) |
|
$ |
123,660 |
|
|
$ |
(15,454 |
) |
|
$ |
2,835 |
|
|
$ |
111,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-17
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(45,480 |
) |
|
$ |
3,964 |
|
|
$ |
17,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
8,682 |
|
|
|
8,106 |
|
|
|
7,567 |
|
|
|
Noncash amortization of debt financing costs
|
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
Noncash option issuance charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,125 |
|
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,151 |
|
|
|
1,031 |
|
|
|
Deferred income tax provision
|
|
|
4,267 |
|
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
|
Noncash (gain) loss on forward exchange contracts
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
3,230 |
|
|
|
(1,291 |
) |
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
|
|
|
51,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash interest expense on subordinated debt
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
Change in other operating items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
(9,215 |
) |
|
|
(4,744 |
) |
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
1,205 |
|
|
|
(6,243 |
) |
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
1,417 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
(2,360 |
) |
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(2,993 |
) |
|
|
(5,278 |
) |
|
|
11,383 |
|
|
|
|
Other assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(1,682 |
) |
|
|
3,541 |
|
|
|
(1,083 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
18,172 |
|
|
|
10,442 |
|
|
|
34,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(4,937 |
) |
|
|
(5,967 |
) |
|
|
(8,907 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(4,937 |
) |
|
|
(5,967 |
) |
|
|
(8,907 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock net
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,105 |
|
|
Repayment of revolving credit facility
|
|
|
(84,093 |
) |
|
|
(75,308 |
) |
|
|
(80,575 |
) |
|
Borrowings under revolving credit facility
|
|
|
80,665 |
|
|
|
79,335 |
|
|
|
58,092 |
|
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,061 |
|
|
Repayments of long-term borrowings
|
|
|
(14,347 |
) |
|
|
(6,768 |
) |
|
|
(116,031 |
) |
|
Proceeds from issuance (repayment) of subordinated debt
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,112 |
) |
|
Payments on capital leases
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
Debt issuance costs and other net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(14,825 |
) |
|
|
(2,761 |
) |
|
|
(28,427 |
) |
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
1,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
(1,508 |
) |
|
|
1,849 |
|
|
|
(2,090 |
) |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year
|
|
|
3,145 |
|
|
|
1,637 |
|
|
|
3,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of year
|
|
$ |
1,637 |
|
|
$ |
3,486 |
|
|
$ |
1,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$ |
11,121 |
|
|
$ |
8,533 |
|
|
$ |
7,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes net
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
157 |
|
|
$ |
2,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-18
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004
|
|
1. |
Organization and Background |
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries (CVG
or the Company) (formerly Bostrom Holding, Inc., a
Delaware corporation) designs and manufactures seat and seating
systems, cab and trim systems, mirrors, wipers and controls for
the North American heavy truck and specialty transportation
markets. In addition, the Company manufactures seat systems for
the worldwide construction and agriculture vehicle markets. The
Company has operations located in Indiana, North Carolina, Ohio,
Oregon, Tennessee, Virginia, Washington, Australia, Belgium,
China, Sweden and the United Kingdom.
The Company was formed on August 22, 2000. On
October 6, 2000, the Company acquired the assets of Bostrom
plc in exchange for $83.6 million in cash and assumption of
certain liabilities (the Acquisition). The source of
the cash consisted of $49.8 million of debt and
$33.8 million of equity. The Company had no operations
prior to October 6, 2000.
The Acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting. Accordingly, the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed by the Company were recorded at fair value as of the
date of the Acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over
the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed
has been recorded as goodwill.
On March 28, 2003, the Company and Commercial Vehicle
Systems Holdings, Inc. (CVS) entered into an
Agreement and Plan of Merger whereby a subsidiary of the Company
was merged into CVS. The holders of the outstanding shares of
CVS received, in exchange, shares of the Company on a
one-for-one basis resulting in the issuance of
4,870,228 shares of common stock. On May 20, 2004, the
Company and Trim Systems, Inc. (Trim) entered into
an Agreement and Plan of Merger whereby a subsidiary of the
Company was merged into Trim (the CVS and Trim mergers are
collectively referred to as the Mergers). On
August 2, 2004, the Trim merger was effected. The holders
of the outstanding shares of Trim received, in exchange, shares
of the Company on a .099-for-one basis resulting in the issuance
of 2,769,567 shares of common stock. In accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 141, the Mergers were accounted for as a combination of
entities under common control. Thus, the accounts of CVS, Trim,
and the Company were combined based upon their respective
historical bases of accounting. The financial statements reflect
the combined results of the Company, CVS and Trim as if the
Mergers had occurred as of the beginning of the earliest period
presented.
On August 4, 2004, the Company reclassified all of its
existing classes of common stock into one class of common stock
and in connection therewith effected a 38.991-to-one stock
split. The stock split has been reflected in the share and per
share amounts for all periods presented.
On August 10, 2004, the Company completed its initial
public offering of common stock at a price of $13.00 per
share. Of the total shares offered, 3,125,000 were sold by the
Company and 6,125,000 were sold by certain selling stockholders.
Net proceeds to the Company of approximately $34.6 million
were used to repay outstanding indebtedness.
On August 23, 2004, the underwriters, pursuant to their
overallotment option, purchased an additional
1,034,500 shares of common stock resulting in net proceeds
of approximately $12.6 million to the Company, which was used to
further reduce outstanding indebtedness and for general
corporate purposes.
|
|
2. |
Significant Accounting Policies |
Principles of Consolidation The accompanying
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the
Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
F-19
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash
equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with an
original maturity of three months or less. Cash equivalents are
stated at cost, which approximates fair value.
Inventories Inventories are valued at the
lower of first-in, first-out (FIFO) cost or market.
Cost includes applicable material, labor and overhead.
Inventories consisted of the following as of December 31
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Raw materials
|
|
$ |
21,664 |
|
|
$ |
27,645 |
|
Work in process
|
|
|
1,781 |
|
|
|
2,111 |
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
6,222 |
|
|
|
7,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29,667 |
|
|
$ |
36,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory quantities on-hand are regularly reviewed, and where
necessary, provisions for excess and obsolete inventory are
recorded based primarily on the Companys estimated
production requirements driven by current market volumes. Excess
and obsolete provisions may vary by product depending upon
future potential use of the product.
Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant
and equipment are recorded at cost. For financial reporting
purposes, depreciation is provided using the straight-line
method over the following estimated useful lives:
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
15 to 40 years |
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
3 to 20 years |
|
Tools and dies
|
|
|
5 years |
|
Computer hardware and software
|
|
|
3 years |
|
Accelerated depreciation methods are used for tax reporting
purposes.
Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred.
Major betterments and improvements which extend the useful life
of the related item are capitalized and depreciated. The cost
and accumulated depreciation of property, plant and equipment
retired or otherwise disposed of are removed from the related
accounts, and any residual values after considering proceeds are
charged or credited to income.
The Company follows the provisions of SFAS No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets, which provides a single accounting model for
impairment of long-lived assets. The Company had no impairments
during 2002, 2003, or 2004.
Other Assets Other assets principally consist
of debt financing costs of approximately $1.2 million at
December 31, 2003 and $2.0 million at
December 31, 2004, which are being amortized over the term
of the related obligations.
Goodwill Goodwill represents the excess of
acquisition purchase price over the fair value of net assets
acquired, which prior to the adoption on January 1, 2002,
of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Intangible Assets,
was being amortized on a straight-line basis over
40 years. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill and
intangible assets with indefinite lives are no longer amortized,
but reviewed annually, or more frequently if impairment
indicators arise. Separable intangible assets that are not
deemed to have indefinite lives will continue to be amortized
over their useful lives, but with no maximum life.
F-20
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Upon adoption of SFAS No. 142 on January 1, 2002,
the Company completed step one of the transitional goodwill
impairment test, using a combination of valuation techniques,
including the discounted cash flow approach and the market
multiple approach, for each of its reporting units.
Upon completion of the required assessments under
SFAS No. 142, it was determined that the fair market
value of its North America reporting unit was lower than its
book value, resulting in a transitional impairment charge of
approximately $51.6 million in 2002. The write-off was
recorded as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting, net
of tax benefit of $9.3 million related to the tax benefit
on the deductible portion of the goodwill, in the Companys
consolidated statement of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2002. The Company will also perform impairment
tests annually and whenever events or circumstances occur
indicating that goodwill or other intangible assets might be
impaired. Based upon the Companys assessments performed
during 2004, no impairment of goodwill was deemed to have
occurred.
The change in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years
ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, for the Companys
reporting units, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North | |
|
All Other | |
|
|
|
|
America | |
|
Countries | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance December 31, 2002
|
|
$ |
60,294 |
|
|
$ |
20,330 |
|
|
$ |
80,624 |
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,248 |
|
|
|
2,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2003
|
|
|
60,294 |
|
|
|
22,578 |
|
|
|
82,872 |
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,843 |
|
|
|
1,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
60,294 |
|
|
$ |
24,421 |
|
|
$ |
84,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Long-term Liabilities Other long-term
liabilities consisted of the following as of December 31
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Pension liability
|
|
$ |
3,609 |
|
|
$ |
4,662 |
|
Facility closure and consolidation costs
|
|
|
932 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
Forward contracts
|
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement medical benefit plan
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
Loss contracts
|
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
Other
|
|
|
2,100 |
|
|
|
2,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,549 |
|
|
$ |
8,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Recognition The Company recognizes
revenue as its products are shipped from its facilities to its
customers which is when title passes to the customer for
substantially all sales. In certain circumstances, the Company
may be committed under existing agreements to supply product to
its customers at selling prices that are not sufficient to cover
the direct cost to produce such product. In such situations, the
Company records a liability for the estimated future amount of
such losses. Such losses are recognized at the time that the
loss is probable and reasonably estimable and are recorded at
the minimum amount necessary to fulfill the Companys
obligations to its customers. The estimated amounts of such
losses were approximately $1.5 million at December 31,
2003 and $0.6 million at December 31, 2004. These
amounts are recorded within accrued liabilities and other
long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets.
F-21
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Warranty The Company is subject to warranty
claims for products that fail to perform as expected due to
design or manufacturing deficiencies. Customers continue to
require their outside suppliers to guarantee or warrant their
products and bear the cost of repair or replacement of such
products. Depending on the terms under which the Company
supplies products to its customers, a customer may hold the
Company responsible for some or all of the repair or replacement
costs of defective products, when the product supplied did not
perform as represented. The Companys policy is to reserve
for estimated future customer warranty costs based on historical
trends and current economic factors. The following presents a
summary of the warranty provision for the years ended
December 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Balance Beginning of the year
|
|
$ |
2,600 |
|
|
$ |
1,999 |
|
|
Additional provisions recorded
|
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
1,813 |
|
|
Deduction for payments made
|
|
|
(1,420 |
) |
|
|
(1,433 |
) |
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance End of year
|
|
$ |
1,999 |
|
|
$ |
2,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes The Company accounts for income
taxes following the provisions of SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires recognition
of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future
tax consequences of events that have been included in the
financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred
tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the
difference between the financial statement and tax bases of
assets and liabilities using currently enacted tax rates.
Comprehensive Income (Loss) The Company
follows the provisions of SFAS No. 130, Reporting
Comprehensive Income, which established standards for
reporting and display of comprehensive income and its
components. Comprehensive income reflects the change in equity
of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and
other events and circumstances from nonowner sources. For the
Company, comprehensive income (loss) represents net income
(loss) adjusted for foreign currency translation adjustments,
minimum pension liability and the deferred gain (loss) on
certain derivative instruments utilized to hedge certain of the
Companys interest rate exposures. In accordance with
SFAS No. 130, the Company has chosen to disclose
comprehensive income (loss) in the consolidated statements of
stockholders investment. The components of accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the following as
of December 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
$ |
3,172 |
|
|
$ |
5,228 |
|
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
(1,849 |
) |
|
|
(2,393 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,323 |
|
|
$ |
2,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities The Company follows the provisions of
SFAS No. 133, Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, as amended, which requires every derivative
instrument, including certain derivative instruments embedded in
other contracts, to be recorded in the balance sheet as either
an asset or liability measured at its fair value.
SFAS No. 133 requires that changes in the
derivatives fair value be recognized currently in earnings
unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. Special
accounting for qualifying hedges allows a derivatives
gains or losses to offset related results on the hedged item in
the statement of operations and requires that a company formally
document, designate and assess the effectiveness of transactions
that receive hedge accounting. In accordance with
SFAS No. 133, the Company recorded the fair value of
the interest rate collar and interest rate swaps described in
Note 6 as a liability at December 31, 2002, with an
offsetting adjustment
F-22
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), as the
interest rate collar and interest rate swaps were cash flow
hedges. The interest rate collar and interest rate swap
contracts were cancelled or expired at various dates through the
end of 2003.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments At
December 31, 2004, the Companys financial instruments
consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable,
accounts payable, accrued liabilities and long-term debt, unless
otherwise noted. The carrying value of these instruments
approximates fair value as a result of the short duration of
such instruments or due to the variability of the interest cost
associated with such instruments, except as disclosed in
Note 6.
Foreign Currency Translation The functional
currency of the Company is the U.S. dollar. Assets and
liabilities of the Companys foreign operations are
translated using the year-end rates of exchange. Results of
operations are translated using the average rates prevailing
throughout the period. Translation gains or losses are
accumulated as a separate component of stockholders
investment.
Use of Estimates The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. The more significant estimates are used for such items
as allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory reserves,
warranty, pension and post retirement benefit liabilities,
contingent liabilities, goodwill impairment and depreciable
lives of property and equipment. Ultimate results could differ
from those estimates.
Foreign Currency Forward Exchange Contracts
The Company uses forward exchange contracts to hedge certain of
its foreign currency transaction exposures of its foreign
operations. The Company estimates its projected revenues and
purchases in certain foreign currencies or locations, and will
hedge a portion or all of the anticipated long or short
position. The contracts typically run from three months up to
three years. These contracts are marked-to-market and the fair
value is included in assets (liabilities) in the
consolidated balance sheets, with the offsetting noncash gain or
loss included in the consolidated statements of operations. The
Company does not hold or issue foreign exchange options or
forward contracts for trading purposes. The following table
summarizes the notional amount of the Companys open
foreign exchange contracts at December 31, 2004 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Local Currency | |
|
|
|
U.S. $ Equivalent | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
U.S. $ Equivalent | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Commitments to buy (sell) currencies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar
|
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
$ |
(192 |
) |
|
$ |
(192 |
) |
|
Eurodollar
|
|
|
54,910 |
|
|
|
74,543 |
|
|
|
76,617 |
|
|
Swedish krona
|
|
|
21,250 |
|
|
|
3,141 |
|
|
|
3,232 |
|
|
Japanese yen
|
|
|
3,875,000 |
|
|
|
42,708 |
|
|
|
40,087 |
|
|
Australian dollar
|
|
|
4,250 |
|
|
|
3,316 |
|
|
|
3,295 |
|
The difference between the U.S. $ equivalent and
U.S. $ equivalent fair value of approximately
$0.5 million is included in other assets in the
consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2004.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements In
December 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 132R, a
revision to SFAS No. 132, Employers
Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement
Benefits. SFAS No. 132R does not change the
measurement or recognition related to pension and other
postretirement plans required by SFAS No. 87,
Employers Accounting for Pensions,
SFAS No. 88, Employers Accounting for
Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans
F-23
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
and for Termination Benefits, and SFAS No. 106,
Employers Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other
Than Pensions, and retains the disclosure requirements
contained in SFAS No. 132. SFAS No. 132R
requires additional disclosures about the assets, obligations,
cash flows and net periodic benefit cost of defined benefit
pension plans and other defined benefit postretirement plans.
SFAS No. 132R is effective for financial statements
with fiscal years ending after December 15, 2003, with the
exception of disclosure requirements related to foreign plans
and estimated future benefit payments which are effective for
fiscal years ending after June 15, 2004. The Company has
included the required disclosures in Note 12 to the
consolidated financial statements. The adoption of
SFAS No. 132R did not impact the Companys
consolidated balance sheet or results of operations.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,
Inventory Costs. This Statement requires that abnormal amounts
of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and spoilage
be recognized as current-period charges. The Statement also
requires that fixed production overhead be allocated to
conversion costs based on the normal capacity of the production
facilities. SFAS No. 151 is effective for inventory
costs incurred by the Company beginning in fiscal year 2006. The
Company is in the process of determining the impact adoption of
this Statement will have on its results of operations.
In December 2004, the FASB revised SFAS No. 123, Share
Based Payment (SFAS No 123R). This Statement supercedes
Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, which resulted in no
stock-based employee compensation cost related to stock options
if the options granted had an exercise price equal to the market
value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.
SFAS No. 123R requires recognition of employee
services provided in exchange for a share-based payment based on
the grant date fair market value. The Company is required to
adopt SFAS No. 123R as of July 1, 2005. As of the
effective date, this Statement applies to all new awards issued
as well as awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled.
Additionally, for stock-based awards issued prior to the
effective date, compensation cost attributable to future
services will be recognized as the remaining service is
rendered. The Company may also elect to restate prior periods by
applying a modified retrospective method to periods prior to the
effective date. The Company is in the process of determining
which method of adoption it will elect as well as the potential
impact on its consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
Accrued liabilities consisted of the following as of
December 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Compensation and benefits
|
|
$ |
7,121 |
|
|
$ |
8,041 |
|
Warranty costs
|
|
|
1,999 |
|
|
|
2,408 |
|
Product liability
|
|
|
721 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
Interest
|
|
|
1,341 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
Income and other taxes
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
2,215 |
|
Facility closure and consolidation costs
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
Freight
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
Loss contracts
|
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
Other
|
|
|
2,914 |
|
|
|
4,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,356 |
|
|
$ |
18,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-24
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
|
|
4. |
Stockholders Investment |
Common Stock The authorized capital stock of
the Company consists of 30,000,000 shares of common stock
with a par value of $0.01 per share. In August, 2004, the
Company reclassified all of its existing classes of common
stock, which effectively resulted in a 38.991-to-one stock
split. The stock split has been reflected in the share and per
share amounts for all periods presented.
Preferred Stock The authorized capital stock
of the Company consists of 5,000,000 shares of preferred
stock with a par value of $0.01 per share, with no shares
outstanding as of December 31, 2004.
Earnings Per Share Basic earnings (loss) per
share was computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the year. In
accordance with SFAS No. 128, an entity that reports a
discontinued operation, an extraordinary item, or the cumulative
effect of an accounting change in a period shall use income from
continuing operations, (before the cumulative effect of an
accounting change) as the control number in determining whether
potential common shares are dilutive or antidilutive. As a
result, diluted earnings (loss) per share, and all other diluted
per share amounts presented, were computed utilizing the same
number of potential common shares used in computing the diluted
per share amount for income before cumulative effect on change
in accounting, regardless if those amounts were antidilutive to
their respective basic per share amounts. Diluted earnings per
share for 2002, 2003 and 2004 includes the effects of
outstanding stock options and warrants using the treasury stock
method (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders
basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
(45,480 |
) |
|
$ |
3,964 |
|
|
$ |
17,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
13,827 |
|
|
|
13,779 |
|
|
|
15,429 |
|
Dilutive effect of outstanding stock options after application
of the treasury stock method
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive shares outstanding
|
|
|
13,931 |
|
|
|
13,883 |
|
|
|
15,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$ |
(3.29 |
) |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earning (loss) per share
|
|
$ |
(3.26 |
) |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
1.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options and Warrants In 1998, the
Company issued options to purchase 57,902 shares of
common stock at $9.43 per share, which are exercisable
through December 2008, in connection with an acquisition. None
of the initially granted options have been exercised as of
December 31, 2004. The options were granted at an exercise
price determined to be at or above fair value on the date of
grant. In addition, the Company had outstanding warrants to
purchase 136,023 shares of common stock at
$3.42 per share, which were exercised in conjunction with
the Companys initial public offering in August 2004.
In May 2004, the Company granted options to
purchase 910,869 shares of common stock at
$5.54 per share. These options have a ten year term, with
50% of such options being immediately exercisable and the
remaining 50% becoming exercisable ratably on June 30, 2005
and June 30, 2006. During June 2004, the Company modified
the terms of these options to be 100% vested immediately. The
Company recorded a noncash compensation charge of
$10.1 million, equal to the difference between $5.54 and
the estimated fair market value.
In October 2004, the Company granted options to
purchase 598,950 shares of common stock at
$15.84 per share. The options were granted at an exercise
price determined to be at or above fair value on the date of
grant. These options have a ten year life and vest equally over
a 3 year period. Had
F-25
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
compensation cost for these plans been determined as required
under SFAS No. 123, the impact to 2004 net income
would have been approximately $0.1 million and basic and
diluted earnings per share would remain unchanged.
Repurchase of Common Stock During 2002 and
2004, the Company repurchased 64,687 and 50,874 shares of
common stock from certain stockholders at an average price of
$3.24 and $4.78 per share, respectively.
Dividends The Company has not declared or
paid any cash dividends in the past. The Companys credit
agreement prohibits the payment of cash dividends.
|
|
5. |
Restructuring and Integration |
Restructuring In 2000, the Company recorded a
$5.6 million restructuring charge as part of its cost and
efficiency initiatives, closing two manufacturing facilities,
two administrative centers, and reorganizing its manufacturing
and administrative functions. Approximately $1.7 million of
the charge was related to employee severance and associated
benefits for the 225 terminated employees, approximately
$2.6 million related to lease and other contractual
commitments associated with the facilities, and approximately
$1.3 million of asset impairments related to the write-down
of assets. All employees were terminated by 2001. The
contractual commitments continue through mid-2005.
In 2001, the Company continued its cost and efficiency
initiatives and closed a third manufacturing facility. Of the
total $0.4 million restructuring charge, approximately
$0.1 million related to employee severance and associated
benefits for 77 employees and approximately $0.3 million
related to lease and other contractual commitments associated
with the facility. All employees were terminated by 2002. The
contractual commitments continue through 2008.
A summary of restructuring activities for the years ended
December 31, 2004 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility Exit | |
|
|
|
|
Employee | |
|
and Other | |
|
|
|
|
Costs | |
|
Contractual Costs | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance December 31, 2002
|
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
$ |
1,177 |
|
|
$ |
1,275 |
|
|
Usage/cash payments
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(390 |
) |
|
|
(488 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
787 |
|
|
Usage/cash payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(509 |
) |
|
|
(509 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integration In connection with the
acquisitions of Bostrom plc and the predecessor to CVS, facility
consolidation plans were designed and implemented to reduce the
cost structure of the Company and to better integrate the
acquired operations. Purchase liabilities recorded as part of
the acquisitions included approximately $3.3 million for
costs associated with the shutdown and consolidation of certain
acquired facilities and severance and other contractual costs.
At December 31, 2004, the Company had principally
F-26
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
completed its actions under these plans, other than certain
contractual commitments, which continue through 2008. Summarized
below is the activity related to these actions (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility Exit | |
|
|
|
|
Employee | |
|
and Other | |
|
|
|
|
Costs | |
|
Contractual Costs | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance December 31, 2002
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
680 |
|
|
$ |
690 |
|
|
Usage/cash payments
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
Usage/cash payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
423 |
|
|
$ |
423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt consisted of the following at December 31 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Revolving credit facilities, bore interest at a weighted average
rate of 5.9% as of December 31, 2003 and 7.0% as of
December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
26,530 |
|
|
$ |
4,566 |
|
Term loans, with principal and interest payable quarterly, bore
interest at a weighted average rate of 5.2% as of
December 31, 2003 and 6.5% as of December 31, 2004
|
|
|
80,195 |
|
|
|
42,857 |
|
Sterling loan notes
|
|
|
3,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6,517 |
|
|
|
6,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,435 |
|
|
|
53,925 |
|
Less current maturities
|
|
|
15,231 |
|
|
|
4,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
101,204 |
|
|
$ |
49,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future maturities of debt as of December 31, 2004 are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
4,884 |
|
2006
|
|
|
12,226 |
|
2007
|
|
|
7,094 |
|
2008
|
|
|
8,504 |
|
2009
|
|
|
14,081 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
7,136 |
|
Credit Agreement The Companys senior
credit agreement consists of a revolving credit facility of
$40 million and term loans of $65 million, of which
approximately $40.0 million expires in July 2009 and
approximately $65.0 million expires in July 2010. Quarterly
repayments are required under the term loans. Borrowings bear
interest at various rates plus a margin based on certain
financial ratios of the Company, as defined. The senior credit
agreement contain various restrictive covenants, including
limiting indebtedness, investments and cash dividends, and also
requires the maintenance of certain financial ratios, including
fixed charge coverage and funded debt to EBITDA. Compliance with
respect to these covenants as of December 31, 2004 was
achieved. Borrowings under the senior credit agreements are
secured by specifically identified assets of the Company,
comprising, in total, substantially all assets of the Company.
F-27
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
In addition, at December 31, 2004 the Company has
outstanding letters of credit of approximately $2.8 million
expiring through April 2008.
The Credit Agreement provides the Company with the ability to
denominate a portion of its borrowings in foreign currencies. As
of December 31, 2004, $29.6 million of the term loans
were denominated in U.S. dollars and $4.6 million of
the revolving credit facility borrowings and $13.2 million
of the term loans were denominated in British pounds sterling.
During March 2003, in conjunction with the Companys merger
with CVS, the Company amended its credit agreement. Based on the
provisions of EITF 96-19, Debtors Accounting for a
Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments, the Company
wrote off the unamortized cost of its old and new fees paid to
the financial institution and third party fees related to the
then existing credit agreement as a loss on extinguishment of
debt. The third party fees related to amended credit agreement
were capitalized and are being amortized over the life of the
amended credit agreement.
Sterling Loan Notes In conjunction with the
acquisition of Bostrom plc, Sterling loan notes were issued in
exchange for certain shares acquired by the Company. The notes
bore interest at LIBOR and were due December 31, 2004. The
Sterling loan notes were fully redeemed in November of 2004.
In June 2001, Onex Corporation, the controlling stockholder of
the Company, and its affiliates (Onex) loaned the
Company $7 million pursuant to a five-year promissory note.
Interest, which was deferred in 2002 and 2003 and through
August 10, 2004 was prime plus 1.25%. The promissory note
was collateralized by all assets of the Company and its
subsidiaries and was subject to an intercreditor agreement
between the Company, certain of its lenders, and Onex. This loan
plus accrued interest was repaid on August 10, 2004 with
proceeds from the Companys initial public offering.
In September 2002, the Company issued subordinated debt in the
amount of $2.5 million to its principal stockholders,
including Onex. The debt bore interest at 12.0% and would have
matured on September 30, 2006. Accrued interest over the
term of the obligation was payable in kind (PIK) at
maturity. Interest accrued during 2004 and added to principal
was approximately $0.2 million. This debt plus PIK interest
was repaid on August 10, 2004 with proceeds from the
Companys initial public offering.
Pretax income before the cumulative effect of change in
accounting consisted of the following for the years ended
December 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Domestic
|
|
$ |
7,795 |
|
|
$ |
3,966 |
|
|
$ |
17,996 |
|
Foreign
|
|
|
3,590 |
|
|
|
5,265 |
|
|
|
5,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
11,385 |
|
|
$ |
9,231 |
|
|
$ |
23,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-28
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
A reconciliation of income taxes computed at the statutory rates
to the reported income tax provision for the years ended
December 31 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Federal provision at statutory rate
|
|
$ |
3,871 |
|
|
$ |
3,139 |
|
|
$ |
8,136 |
|
U.S. tax on foreign income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,411 |
|
|
|
779 |
|
Foreign provision in excess (less) than U.S. tax rate
|
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
State taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
1,087 |
|
Other
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
307 |
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,808 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$ |
5,235 |
|
|
$ |
5,267 |
|
|
$ |
6,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes for the years ended
December 31 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Current
|
|
$ |
968 |
|
|
$ |
3,968 |
|
|
$ |
5,141 |
|
Deferred
|
|
|
4,267 |
|
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$ |
5,235 |
|
|
$ |
5,267 |
|
|
$ |
6,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of deferred income tax assets and liabilities is as
follows as of December 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Current deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$ |
435 |
|
|
$ |
457 |
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
1,716 |
|
|
|
1,731 |
|
|
|
Warranty costs
|
|
|
1,152 |
|
|
|
677 |
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,442 |
|
|
|
Other accruals not currently deductible for tax purposes
|
|
|
2,415 |
|
|
|
1,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net current deferred assets
|
|
$ |
5,995 |
|
|
$ |
8,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization lives and methods
|
|
$ |
1,306 |
|
|
$ |
(1,837 |
) |
|
|
Pension obligation
|
|
|
1,655 |
|
|
|
1,906 |
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
4,834 |
|
|
|
3,730 |
|
|
|
Original issue discount
|
|
|
4,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(3,808 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign tax credit carryforwards
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
1,694 |
|
|
|
Other accruals not currently deductible for tax purposes
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net noncurrent deferred tax assets
|
|
$ |
9,011 |
|
|
$ |
5,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2004, the Company had approximately
$8.3 million of federal and $23.1 million of state net
operating loss carryforwards related to the Companys
U.S. operations. Utilization of these
F-29
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
losses is subject to the tax laws of the applicable tax
jurisdiction and the Companys legal organizational
structure, and may be limited by the ability of certain
subsidiaries to generate taxable income in the associated tax
jurisdiction. The Companys net operating loss
carryforwards expire beginning in 2015 and continue through
2023. In 2004, it was determined that the valuation allowance in
place pertaining to net operating losses at December 31,
2003 was no longer necessary due to the likelihood of future
recovery. The deferred income tax provision consists of the
change in the deferred income tax assets, adjusted for the
impact of the tax benefit on the cumulative effect of the change
in accounting and the tax impact of certain of the other
comprehensive income (loss) items. No provision has been made
for U.S. income taxes related to undistributed earnings of
the Companys foreign subsidiaries that are intended to be
permanently reinvested.
The Company operates in multiple jurisdictions and is routinely
under audit by federal, state, and international tax
authorities. Exposures exist related to various filing positions
which may require an extended period of time to resolve and may
result in income tax adjustments by the taxing authorities.
Reserves for these potential exposures have been established
which represent managements best estimate of the probable
adjustments. On a quarterly basis, management evaluates the
reserve amounts in light of any additional information and
adjusts the reserve balances as necessary to reflect the best
estimate of the probable outcomes. Management believes that the
Company has established the appropriate reserve for these
estimated exposures. However, actual results may differ from
these estimates. The resolution of these matters in a particular
future period could have an impact on the Companys
consolidated statement of operations and provision for income
taxes.
The Company follows the provisions of SFAS No. 131,
Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information. The Company is organized in two divisions based
on the products that each division offers to OEM customers. Each
division reports their results of operations, submits budgets,
and makes capital expenditures requests to their operating
decision-making group. This group consists of the president and
chief executive officer, the general managers of the divisions,
and the chief financial officer. The Companys operating
segments have been aggregated into one reportable segment, as
the Company believes it meets the aggregation criteria of
SFAS No. 131. The Companys divisions, each with
a separate general manager, are dedicated to providing
components and systems to OEM customers. Each of the
divisions demonstrates similar economic performance, mainly
driven by production volumes of the customers which they
service. All of the Companys operations use similar
manufacturing techniques and utilize common cost saving tools.
These techniques include a continuous improvement program
designed to reduce the Companys overall cost base and to
enable the Company to better handle heavy truck and specialty
transportation market volume fluctuations.
The following table presents revenues and long-lived assets for
each of the geographic areas in which the Company operates (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Long-lived | |
|
|
|
Long-lived | |
|
|
|
Long-lived | |
|
|
Revenues | |
|
Assets | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Assets | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Assets | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
North America
|
|
$ |
229,706 |
|
|
$ |
31,977 |
|
|
$ |
201,132 |
|
|
$ |
28,787 |
|
|
$ |
272,460 |
|
|
$ |
26,918 |
|
All other countries
|
|
|
68,972 |
|
|
|
3,047 |
|
|
|
86,447 |
|
|
|
4,705 |
|
|
|
107,985 |
|
|
|
6,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
298,678 |
|
|
$ |
35,024 |
|
|
$ |
287,579 |
|
|
$ |
33,492 |
|
|
$ |
380,445 |
|
|
$ |
32,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues are attributed to geographic locations based on the
location of product production.
F-30
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The following is a summary composition by product category of
the Companys revenues (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Seats and seating systems
|
|
$ |
136,632 |
|
|
$ |
148,916 |
|
|
$ |
202,469 |
|
Trim systems and components
|
|
|
96,000 |
|
|
|
76,864 |
|
|
|
106,172 |
|
Mirrors, wipers and controls
|
|
|
66,046 |
|
|
|
61,799 |
|
|
|
71,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$ |
298,678 |
|
|
$ |
287,579 |
|
|
$ |
380,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers that accounted for a significant portion of
consolidated revenues for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2004 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
PACCAR
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
28 |
% |
Freightliner
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
International
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Volvo/ Mack
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Caterpillar
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
As of December 31, 2003 and 2004, receivables from these
customers represented 49% and 47% of total receivables,
respectively.
|
|
11. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
401(k) Plans The Company sponsors various
401(k) employee savings plans covering all eligible employees,
as defined. Eligible employees can contribute on a pretax basis
to the plan. In accordance with the terms of the 401(k) plans,
the Company elects to match a certain percentage of the
participants contributions to the plans, as defined. The
Company recognized expense associated with these plans of
approximately $380,000, $291,000 and $463,000 in 2002, 2003 and
2004, respectively.
Leases The Company leases office and
manufacturing space and certain equipment under operating lease
agreements that require it to pay maintenance, insurance, taxes
and other expenses in addition to annual rentals. Of these lease
rentals, approximately $0.5 million are included in the
facility closure and consolidation cost reserve. The anticipated
future lease costs are based in part on certain assumptions and
estimates with respect to sublease income and the Company will
continue to monitor these costs to determine if the estimates
need to be revised in the future. Lease expense was
approximately $3.9 million,
F-31
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
$5.1 million and $5.6 million in 2002, 2003 and 2004,
respectively. Future minimum annual rental commitments at
December 31, 2004 under these leases are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
5,082 |
|
2006
|
|
|
3,910 |
|
2007
|
|
|
3,230 |
|
2008
|
|
|
2,939 |
|
2009
|
|
|
1,785 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
534 |
|
Litigation The Company is subject to various
legal actions and claims incidental to its business, including
those arising out of alleged defects, product warranties,
employment-related matters and environmental matters. Management
believes that the Company maintains adequate insurance to cover
these claims. The Company has established reserves for issues
that are probable and estimatable in amounts management believes
are adequate to cover reasonable adverse judgments not covered
by insurance. Based upon the information available to management
and discussions with legal counsel, it is the opinion of
management that the ultimate outcome of the various legal
actions and claims that are incidental to the Companys
business will not have a material adverse impact on the
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows of the Company; however, such matters are subject to many
uncertainties, and the outcomes of individual matters are not
predictable with assurance.
|
|
12. |
Defined Benefit Plan and Postretirement Benefits |
The Company sponsors a defined benefit plan that covers certain
hourly and salaried employees in the United Kingdom. The
Companys policy is to make annual contributions to the
plan to fund the normal cost as required by local regulations.
In addition, the Company has an informal postretirement medical
benefit plan for certain retirees and their dependents of the
U.S. operations, and has recorded a liability for its
estimated obligation under this plan. The postretirement medical
benefit plan covers certain former employees and is no longer
available to current employees.
F-32
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The change in benefit obligation, plan assets and funded status
as of and for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004
consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Post- | |
|
|
|
Post- | |
|
|
Pension Plan | |
|
Retirement | |
|
Pension Plan | |
|
Retirement | |
|
|
in Which | |
|
Benefits | |
|
in Which | |
|
Benefits | |
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
Other | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Other | |
|
|
Benefits | |
|
Than | |
|
Benefits | |
|
Than | |
|
|
Exceed Assets | |
|
Pensions | |
|
Exceed Assets | |
|
Pensions | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Change in benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation Beginning of year
|
|
$ |
24,348 |
|
|
$ |
847 |
|
|
$ |
29,897 |
|
|
$ |
834 |
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
1,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,640 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
1,879 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
Plan participants contributions
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial (gain) loss
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
2,628 |
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(1,015 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(996 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
Exchange rate changes
|
|
|
2,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
|
29,897 |
|
|
|
834 |
|
|
|
37,576 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
Change in plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets Beginning of year
|
|
|
17,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
3,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
1,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
Plan participants contributions
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(1,015 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(996 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
Exchange rate changes
|
|
|
1,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
|
22,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,397 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
|
(7,056 |
) |
|
|
(834 |
) |
|
|
(9,179 |
) |
|
|
(687 |
) |
|
Unrecognized actuarial loss
|
|
|
6,617 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
8,407 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
Adjustment to recognize minimum liability
|
|
|
(3,170 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,890 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued benefit cost
|
|
$ |
(3,609 |
) |
|
$ |
(620 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,662 |
) |
|
$ |
(601 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2003 and 2004, the Company was required to
record a minimum pension liability of approximately
$3.6 million and $4.7 million, respectively, which is
included in other long-term liabilities and accumulated other
comprehensive loss, net of tax, in the consolidated financial
statements. The accumulated benefit obligation for the pension
plan was $33.8 million at December 31, 2004 and
$29.1 million at December 31, 2003.
F-33
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The following weighted-average assumptions were used to account
for the plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Post- | |
|
|
|
Post- | |
|
|
|
|
retirement | |
|
|
|
retirement | |
|
|
|
|
Benefits | |
|
|
|
Benefits | |
|
|
Pension | |
|
Other Than | |
|
Pension | |
|
Other Than | |
|
|
Benefits | |
|
Pensions | |
|
Benefits | |
|
Pensions | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
5.50 |
% |
|
|
5.75 |
% |
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
7.50 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
7.50 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
3.00 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
3.20 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
For measurement purposes, a 10% annual rate of increase in the
per capita cost of covered health care benefits was assumed for
2005. The rate was assumed to decrease gradually to 5.0% through
2010 and remain constant thereafter. Assumed health care cost
trend rates can have a significant effect on the amounts
reported for postretirement medical benefit plans. A one
percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates
would not have had a material impact on total service and
interest cost components or on the postretirement benefit
obligation.
The components of net periodic benefit cost for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement | |
|
|
|
|
Benefits | |
|
|
Pension Benefits | |
|
Other Than Pensions | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Service cost
|
|
$ |
1,048 |
|
|
$ |
1,134 |
|
|
$ |
1,213 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,465 |
|
|
|
1,640 |
|
|
|
1,879 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(1,548 |
) |
|
|
(1,451 |
) |
|
|
(1,879 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized actuarial loss
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$ |
1,080 |
|
|
$ |
1,708 |
|
|
|
1,498 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average asset allocations of the Companys
U.K. pension assets at December 31, 2003 and 2004, by asset
category, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Equity securities
|
|
|
51 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
Debt securities
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Other
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
The Company employs a total return investment approach whereby a
mix of equities and fixed income investments are used to
maximize the long-term return of plan assets for a prudent level
of risk. The intent of this strategy is to minimize plan
expenses by outperforming plan liabilities over the long run.
Risk tolerance is established through careful consideration of
plan liabilities, plan funded status, and corporate financial
condition. The investment portfolio contains a diversified blend
of equity and fixed income investments. Furthermore, equity
investments are diversified across U.S. and non-U.S. stocks
as well as growth, value, and small and large capitalizations.
Other assets such as real estate, private equity, and hedge
funds are used judiciously to enhance long-term returns while
improving portfolio diversification. Derivatives may be used to
gain market exposure in an efficient and timely manner; however,
derivatives may not be used to leverage the portfolio beyond the
market value of the underlying investments. Investment risk is
measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through annual
liability
F-34
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
measurements, periodic asset/liability studies, and quarterly
investment portfolio reviews. The Company expects to contribute
$1.2 million to its pension plan and $0.1 million to
its postretirement medical benefit plan in 2005.
The following table presents the Companys projected
benefit payments as of December 31, 2004 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Pension | |
|
Post-Retirement | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
2005
|
|
$ |
570 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
2006
|
|
|
691 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
2007
|
|
|
770 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
2008
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
2009
|
|
|
974 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
7,125 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
13. |
Related Party Transactions |
In addition to the items discussed in Note 7, the following
related party transactions occurred during the three years ended
December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
The Company made payments of $1.0 million,
$1.6 million and $1.1 million to Hidden Creek
Industries, an affiliate of the Company, for financing and
acquisition-related services in 2002, 2003 and 2004,
respectively. These services are included in selling, general
and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of
operations. |
|
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company
recognized revenues of approximately $1.8 million for the
sale of design services to ASC, an affiliate of the Company. |
|
|
|
In 2001, Onex acquired a one-third interest in the
Companys $66.0 million senior credit facility. Total
interest expense related to the portion of this senior credit
facility owned by Onex was approximately $1.0 million,
$0.9 million and $0.5 million for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively. This debt
plus accrued interest was repaid on August 10, 2004 in
conjunction with the Companys initial public offering and
the Companys new $105 million senior credit facility. |
F-35
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
14. Quarterly Financial Data
(Unaudited):
The following is a condensed summary of actual quarterly results
of operations for 2003 and 2004 (in thousands, except per share
amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic | |
|
Diluted | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Earnings | |
|
|
|
|
Gross | |
|
Operating | |
|
Income | |
|
(Loss) | |
|
(Loss) Per | |
|
|
Revenues | |
|
Profit | |
|
Income | |
|
(Loss) | |
|
Per Share | |
|
Share(a) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
$ |
66,383 |
|
|
$ |
10,155 |
|
|
$ |
4,149 |
|
|
$ |
(1,699 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
Second
|
|
|
71,408 |
|
|
|
12,151 |
|
|
|
6,302 |
|
|
|
1,521 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
Third
|
|
|
71,707 |
|
|
|
13,081 |
|
|
|
7,277 |
|
|
|
2,734 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
Fourth
|
|
|
78,081 |
|
|
|
14,307 |
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
1,407 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
$ |
85,990 |
|
|
$ |
15,487 |
|
|
$ |
7,954 |
|
|
$ |
5,549 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
Second
|
|
|
94,491 |
|
|
|
16,855 |
|
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
(877 |
) |
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
(0.06 |
)(b) |
Third
|
|
|
98,713 |
|
|
|
18,229 |
|
|
|
11,289 |
|
|
|
6,846 |
|
|
|
0.42 |
|
|
|
0.42 |
|
Fourth
|
|
|
101,252 |
|
|
|
20,178 |
|
|
|
12,453 |
|
|
|
5,931 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
(a) See Note 4 for discussion on the computation of
diluted shares outstanding.
|
|
(b) |
Includes $10,125 noncash compensation charge related to
modification of vesting of options issued in May 2004. |
The sum of the per share amounts for the quarters does not equal
the total for the year due to the application of the treasury
stock method.
On February 7, 2005 the Company acquired substantially all
of the assets and liabilities related to Mayflower Vehicle
Systems North American Commercial Vehicle Operations
(MVS) for cash consideration of $107.5 million.
MVS, whose products include frames and assemblies, sleeper boxes
and other structural components, was the only non-captive
producer of complete truck cabs for the commercial vehicle
sector and has full service engineering and development
capabilities. Products include cab frames and assemblies,
sleeper boxes and other structural components. MVS customers
include International, Volvo/ Mack and Freightliner. The
acquisition of MVS adds manufacturing facilities in Norwalk and
Shadyside, Ohio and Kings Mountain, North Carolina and a
technical facility in the Detroit, Michigan area to the
Companys operations. For the year ended December 31,
2004, MVS recorded revenues of approximately $207 million
and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization of approximately $25 million. The acquisition
of MVS was financed by an increase and amendment to our existing
senior credit facility increasing our revolving credit facility
from $40 million to $75 million and term loans from
$65 million to $145 million.
F-36
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Commercial Vehicle
Group, Inc.
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the
Company) (formerly Bostrom Holding, Inc., a Delaware
corporation) as of December 31, 2003 and 2004, and for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004,
and have issued our report thereon dated March 3, 2005
(which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph relating to the change in the
Companys method of accounting for goodwill and other
intangible assets); such consolidated financial statements and
report are included elsewhere in this Registration Statement.
Our audits also included the consolidated financial statement
schedules of Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries.
These consolidated financial statement schedules are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In
our opinion, such consolidated financial statement schedules,
when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material
respects the information set forth therein.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche
LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 3, 2005
F-37
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II: VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:
The transactions in the allowance for doubtful accounts for the
years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004 were as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance Beginning of the year
|
|
$ |
4,103 |
|
|
$ |
2,309 |
|
|
$ |
2,530 |
|
Provisions
|
|
|
(497 |
) |
|
|
1,529 |
|
|
|
2,448 |
|
Utilizations
|
|
|
(1,454 |
) |
|
|
(1,424 |
) |
|
|
(2,390 |
) |
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance End of the year
|
|
$ |
2,309 |
|
|
$ |
2,530 |
|
|
$ |
2,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Purchase Liabilities Recorded in Conjunction with
Acquisitions:
The transactions in the purchase liabilities account recorded in
conjunction with acquisitions for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004 were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance Beginning of the year
|
|
$ |
1,868 |
|
|
$ |
690 |
|
|
$ |
620 |
|
Provisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utilizations
|
|
|
(1,178 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance End of the year
|
|
$ |
690 |
|
|
$ |
620 |
|
|
$ |
423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility Closure and Consolidation Costs:
The transactions in the facility closure and consolidation costs
account for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and
2004 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance Beginning of the year
|
|
$ |
2,197 |
|
|
$ |
1,275 |
|
|
$ |
787 |
|
Provisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utilizations
|
|
|
(922 |
) |
|
|
(488 |
) |
|
|
(509 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance End of the year
|
|
$ |
1,275 |
|
|
$ |
787 |
|
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-38
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT
Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of
Mayflower Vehicle Systems Truck Group (the Company,
a division of Mayflower US Holdings, Inc.) as of
December 31, 2003 and the related consolidated statements
of operations, divisional equity, and cash flows for the years
ended December 31, 2003 and 2002. These consolidated
financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial
statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not
required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of
its internal control over financial reporting. An audit includes
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements,
assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the
Company as of December 31, 2003 and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the
period ended December 31, 2003, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
April 18, 2005
F-39
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT
Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of
Mayflower Vehicle Systems Truck Group (the Company,
a division of Mayflower US Holdings, Inc.) as of
December 31, 2004 and the related consolidated statements
of operations, divisional equity, and cash flows for the year
then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit
in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the
United States of America. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the consolidated financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. In our
opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of the Company
as of December 31, 2004 and the results of its operations
and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
April 18, 2005
Toronto, Canada
F-40
MAYFLOWER VEHICLE SYSTEMS TRUCK GROUP
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
Years Ended December 31, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
ASSETS |
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
12,675 |
|
|
$ |
5,184 |
|
|
Accounts receivable net of reserve for doubtful
accounts of $739 and $274, respectively
|
|
|
31,382 |
|
|
|
20,474 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
9,732 |
|
|
|
6,932 |
|
|
Tooling
|
|
|
1,776 |
|
|
|
1,829 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
6,971 |
|
|
|
5,680 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
2,368 |
|
|
|
1,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
64,904 |
|
|
|
41,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and buildings
|
|
|
26,607 |
|
|
|
26,300 |
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
45,220 |
|
|
|
42,416 |
|
|
Furniture & fixtures
|
|
|
931 |
|
|
|
2,142 |
|
|
Computer equipment/software
|
|
|
7,513 |
|
|
|
6,814 |
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
1,160 |
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(44,768 |
) |
|
|
(40,273 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment net
|
|
|
36,154 |
|
|
|
38,559 |
|
OTHER ASSETS
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
101,495 |
|
|
$ |
80,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND DIVISIONAL EQUITY |
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
17,447 |
|
|
$ |
15,045 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
23,348 |
|
|
|
16,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
40,795 |
|
|
|
31,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
7,769 |
|
|
|
6,666 |
|
|
Retiree medical
|
|
|
3,968 |
|
|
|
4,119 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
1,779 |
|
|
|
1,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
13,516 |
|
|
|
12,116 |
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
54,311 |
|
|
|
43,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Notes 7 and 8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIVISIONAL EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Divisional equity
|
|
|
49,976 |
|
|
|
39,944 |
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(2,792 |
) |
|
|
(2,418 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total divisional equity
|
|
|
47,184 |
|
|
|
37,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
101,495 |
|
|
$ |
80,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-41
MAYFLOWER VEHICLE SYSTEMS TRUCK GROUP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
REVENUES
|
|
$ |
206,457 |
|
|
$ |
136,133 |
|
|
$ |
102,433 |
|
COST OF SALES
|
|
|
181,209 |
|
|
|
127,735 |
|
|
|
101,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
25,248 |
|
|
|
8,398 |
|
|
|
677 |
|
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
|
|
|
3,659 |
|
|
|
3,034 |
|
|
|
3,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
21,589 |
|
|
|
5,364 |
|
|
|
(3,105 |
) |
INTEREST INCOME
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME
|
|
|
(765 |
) |
|
|
1,715 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
ROYALTY AND MANAGEMENT FEES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,776 |
) |
|
|
(2,784 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income
taxes
|
|
|
20,994 |
|
|
|
3,403 |
|
|
|
(5,569 |
) |
PROVISION (BENEFIT) FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
7,865 |
|
|
|
1,338 |
|
|
|
(1,921 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
$ |
13,129 |
|
|
$ |
2,065 |
|
|
$ |
(3,648 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-42
MAYFLOWER VEHICLE SYSTEMS TRUCK GROUP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF DIVISIONAL EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Divisional | |
|
Accumulated Other | |
|
|
|
|
Equity | |
|
Comprehensive Loss | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
BALANCE December 31, 2001
|
|
$ |
65,356 |
|
|
$ |
(393 |
) |
|
$ |
64,963 |
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(3,648 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,332 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,980 |
) |
|
Advances to related parties (Note 4)
|
|
|
(11,106 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,106 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCEDecember 31, 2002
|
|
|
50,602 |
|
|
|
(2,725 |
) |
|
|
47,877 |
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
2,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,372 |
|
|
Advances to related parties (Note 4)
|
|
|
(12,723 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,723 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCEDecember 31, 2003
|
|
|
39,944 |
|
|
|
(2,418 |
) |
|
|
37,526 |
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
13,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(374 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,755 |
|
|
Advances to related parties (Note 4)
|
|
|
(3,097 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,097 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
49,976 |
|
|
$ |
(2,792 |
) |
|
$ |
47,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-43
MAYFLOWER VEHICLE SYSTEMS TRUCK GROUP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
13,129 |
|
|
$ |
2,065 |
|
|
$ |
(3,648 |
) |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
4,927 |
|
|
|
5,171 |
|
|
|
5,017 |
|
|
Loss (gain) on sale of assets
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
(638 |
) |
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
(843 |
) |
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
(3,265 |
) |
|
Pension asset
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Change in other operating items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
(10,908 |
) |
|
|
(5,965 |
) |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(2,800 |
) |
|
|
2,398 |
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
2,402 |
|
|
|
8,817 |
|
|
|
(298 |
) |
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
7,229 |
|
|
|
4,125 |
|
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(1,953 |
) |
|
|
2,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
13,132 |
|
|
|
14,721 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(2,634 |
) |
|
|
(1,748 |
) |
|
|
(1,452 |
) |
|
Other
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
1,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used) in investing activities
|
|
|
(2,544 |
) |
|
|
(1,043 |
) |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances to related parties (Note 4)
|
|
|
(3,097 |
) |
|
|
(12,723 |
) |
|
|
(11,106 |
) |
|
Collections on intercompany receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,784 |
|
|
|
4,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(3,097 |
) |
|
|
(8,939 |
) |
|
|
(6,891 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
7,491 |
|
|
|
4,739 |
|
|
|
(6,565 |
) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of year
|
|
|
5,184 |
|
|
|
445 |
|
|
|
7,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of year
|
|
$ |
12,675 |
|
|
$ |
5,184 |
|
|
$ |
445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
$ |
146 |
|
|
$ |
112 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements
F-44
MAYFLOWER VEHICLE SYSTEMS TRUCK GROUP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
1. |
Organization and Background |
On February 7, 2005, Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.
(CVG) acquired the Truck Group operations (the
Company) of Mayflower Vehicle Systems, Inc.
(MVS) which in turn is a wholly owned subsidiary of
Mayflower US Holdings, Inc. (Mayflower) which is a
wholly owned subsidiary of Mayflower plc, the UK Parent Company.
The consideration paid in the acquisition consisted of cash in
the amount of $107.5 million. No purchase accounting
adjustments have been recorded in these accompanying
consolidated financial statements for the acquisition of the
Company by CVG. The Mayflower Vehicle Systems Truck Group
financial information provided is the carve out of MVS Truck
Group operations as described below.
The Company manufactures truck cabs and components for the North
American heavy truck markets, along with various assemblies and
components for the US automotive markets. The Company has
manufacturing operations located in Ohio and North Carolina,
along with an Engineering and Sales office in Michigan. These
operations are referred to as the Truck Group operations. In
addition, MVS also operated a facility in South Charleston
(South Charleston) that manufactured parts for the
North American Automotive and Truck markets and represented
approximately 50% of the consolidated revenue of MVS.
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared to
reflect only the Truck Group operations and to exclude the
assets, liabilities and financial results of South Charleston,
and are referred to herein as carve-out financial
statements. The accompanying carve-out balance sheets,
statements of operations, and statements of cash flows have been
to facilitate CVGs compliance with the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. These
financial statements have been prepared on a historical cost
basis from the books and records maintained by the Company, on
the basis of established accounting methods, practices and
procedures (Note 2) and the accounting judgments and
estimation methodologies used by the Company. The Company never
operated as a separate entity, but rather was an integrated part
of Mayflowers consolidated business and accordingly, the
amounts in the accompanying financial statements may not be
indicative of the financial position, results of operations, and
cash flows that would have resulted had the Company operated as
a separate entity.
The carve-out financial statements include the direct revenue
and direct operating expenses that relate to the Company. Direct
operating expenses include salaries and wages, fringe benefits,
materials, depreciation, and other expenses solely attributable
to the Company. Other costs and expenses have been allocated
based on the revenues of the Company compared to the
consolidated revenue of MVS. In addition, the carve-out
financial statements also include allocations of corporate
expenses which are determined by Mayflower plc and include
banking, insurance services, and corporate overhead of
$3.8 million in 2003 and $2.8 million in 2002. During
2004, no allocations occurred as Mayflower plc provided none of
these services. The carve-out balance sheet includes assets and
liabilities directly attributable to the Company and excludes
amounts related to South Charleston, in certain circumstances
assets and liabilities have been allocated based on the relative
size of the Company to MVS. Furthermore, the net investment in
the Truck Group operations is reflected on the consolidated
balance sheet as divisional equity and reflects a reduction for
net advances made to the Companys parent. These advances
do not bear interest.
|
|
2. |
Significant Accounting Policies |
Principles of Consolidation The accompanying
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the
Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. As described
above, these financial statements exclude activity associated
with South Charleston. All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated.
F-45
MAYFLOWER VEHICLE SYSTEMS TRUCK GROUP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash
equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with an
original maturity of three months or less. Cash equivalents are
stated at cost which approximates fair value.
Letter of credit At December 31, 2004
the Company has outstanding an irrevocable letter of credit in
the amount of $1 million in respect of certain self-insured
workers compensation liabilities.
Inventories Inventories are stated at the
lower of cost or market, with cost determined using the
first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Reserves have been
established for obsolete inventory, slow moving inventory and a
standard to actual adjustment.
Inventories consisted of the following as of December 31 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Raw materials
|
|
$ |
4,709 |
|
|
$ |
2,597 |
|
Work in process
|
|
|
5,183 |
|
|
|
4,650 |
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
Less: Inventory reserves
|
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
(843 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,732 |
|
|
$ |
6,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer Tooling Programs Excess of cost over
billings on uncompleted tooling projects represents costs
incurred by the Company in the production or procurement of
customer-owned tooling to be used by the Company in the
manufacture of its products. The Company receives a specific
purchase order for this tooling and is reimbursed by the
customer within one operating cycle. Costs are deferred until
reimbursed by the customer. Forecasted losses on incomplete
projects are recognized currently.
Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant
and equipment are recorded at cost. For financial reporting
purposes, depreciation is provided using the straight-line
method over the following estimated useful lives:
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings and Improvements
|
|
|
12 to 40 years |
|
Machinery and Equipment
|
|
|
3 to 20 years |
|
Furniture and Fixtures
|
|
|
3 to 5 years |
|
Computer Equipment/Software
|
|
|
3 to 8 years |
|
Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the remaining life
of the lease.
An accelerated depreciation method is used for tax reporting
purposes.
Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred.
Major betterments and improvements which extend the useful life
of the related item are capitalized and depreciated. The cost
and accumulated depreciation of property, plant and equipment
retired or otherwise disposed of are removed from the related
accounts, and any residual values after considering proceeds are
charged or credited to income.
The Company follows the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. The Company
had no impairment during 2002, 2003 or 2004.
Revenue Recognition The Company recognizes
revenue as its products are shipped from its facilities to its
customers, which is when title passes to the customer.
Engineering service revenue is recognized in the month it is
performed.
F-46
MAYFLOWER VEHICLE SYSTEMS TRUCK GROUP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Warranty The Company is subject to warranty
claims for products that fail to perform as expected due to
design or manufacturing deficiencies. Customers continue to
require their outside suppliers to guarantee or warrant their
products and bear the cost of repair or replacement of such
products. Depending on the terms under which the Company
supplies products to its customers, a customer may hold the
Company responsible for some or all of the repair or replacement
costs of defective products, when the product supplied did not
perform as represented. The Companys policy is to reserve
for estimated future customer warranty costs based on historical
trends and current economic factors. As the warranty is an
estimate of future obligations, it is based on certain
assumptions including previous experience. The nature of this
estimate is such that actual payments made in respect of
warranty claims could differ from the amount estimated.
The following presents a summary of the warranty provision for
the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Balance Beginning of the year
|
|
$ |
3,917 |
|
|
$ |
2,916 |
|
|
Additional provisions recorded
|
|
|
1,594 |
|
|
|
1,986 |
|
|
Deduction for payments made
|
|
|
(742 |
) |
|
|
(985 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance End of year
|
|
$ |
4,769 |
|
|
$ |
3,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royalty and Management Fees The Company
shares the costs of certain services that are common to or
provided by Mayflower plc. These services include banking,
insurance services, and corporate overhead. The Companys
allocation of these services, which reflects the amounts
recorded in the consolidated financial statements, is based on a
percentage of budgeted revenue. No such services were charged
during 2004.
Income Taxes The Company accounts for income
taxes following the provisions of SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires recognition of
deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax
consequences of events that have been included in the financial
statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax
assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference
between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and
liabilities using currently enacted tax rates.
Comprehensive Income (Loss) The Company
follows the provisions of SFAS No. 130, Reporting
Comprehensive Income, which established standards for
reporting and display of comprehensive income and its
components. Comprehensive income reflects the change in equity
of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and
other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. For the
Company, comprehensive income (loss) represents net income
(loss) adjusted for minimum pension liability. In
accordance with SFAS No. 130, the Company has chosen
to disclose comprehensive income (loss) in the consolidated
statements of stockholders investment.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments At
December 31, 2004, the Companys financial instruments
consist of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and
accrued liabilities. The carrying value of these instruments
approximates fair value as a result of the short duration of
such instruments.
Use of Estimates The preparation of
consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make
estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the
disclosures of contingent liabilities at the date of the
financial statements, along with the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
F-47
MAYFLOWER VEHICLE SYSTEMS TRUCK GROUP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements In
December 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 132(R), a
revision to SFAS No. 132, Employers
Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement
Benefits. SFAS No. 132(R) does not change the
measurement or recognition related to pension and other
postretirement plans required by SFAS No. 87,
Employers Accounting for Pensions, SFAS No.
88, Employers Accounting for Settlements and
Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for
Termination Benefits, and SFAS No. 106,
Employers Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other
Than Pensions, and retains the disclosure requirements
contained in SFAS No. 132. SFAS No. 132(R)
requires additional disclosures about the assets, obligations,
cash flows and net periodic benefit cost of defined benefit
pension plans and other defined benefit postretirement plans.
SFAS No. 132(R) is effective for financial statements
with fiscal years ending after December 15, 2003, with the
exception of disclosure requirements related to foreign plans
and estimated future benefit payments, which are effective for
fiscal years ending after June 15, 2004. The Company has
included the required disclosures in Note 8 to the
consolidated financial statements. The adoption of
SFAS No. 132(R) did not impact the Companys
consolidated balance sheet or results of operations.
In November 2002, the FASB issued FIN 45,
Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for
Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of
Others, (FIN 45). FIN 45 clarifies the
requirements for a guarantors accounting for and
disclosure of certain guarantees issued and outstanding. The
initial recognition and initial measurement provisions of
FIN 45 are applicable to guarantees issued or modified
after December 31, 2002. The disclosure requirements of
FIN 45 are effective for financial statements of interim or
annual periods ending after December 15, 2002. The adoption
of FIN 45 did not have an impact on the Companys
consolidated balance sheet or results of operations.
In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46
(FIN 46), Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities. FIN 46 addresses the consolidation of
variable interest entities, including entities commonly referred
to as special purposes entities. The Company will be required to
adopt the provisions of FIN 46 during 2005 but does not
anticipate that it will have an impact on the Companys
consolidated balance sheet or results of operations.
In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150,
Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with
Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity. This
statement establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and
measures in its statement of financial position certain
financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities
and equity. SFAS No. 150 requires issuers to classify
as liabilities (or assets in some circumstances) three classes
of freestanding financial instruments that embody obligations
for the issuer. Generally, SFAS No. 150 is effective
for financial instruments entered into or modified after
May 31, 2003, and was otherwise effective for the Company
at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after
June 15, 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 150 did
not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated
balance sheet or results of operations.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,
Inventory Costs. This Statement requires that abnormal
amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and
spoilage be recognized as current-period charges. The Statement
also requires that fixed production overhead be allocated to
conversion costs based on the normal capacity of the production
facilities. SFAS No. 151 is effective for inventory
costs incurred by the Company beginning in fiscal year 2006. The
Company is in process of determining the impact adoption of this
Statement will have on its results of operations.
F-48
MAYFLOWER VEHICLE SYSTEMS TRUCK GROUP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accrued liabilities consisted of the following as of
December 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Payroll Accruals
|
|
$ |
1,143 |
|
|
$ |
868 |
|
Health Insurance
|
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
889 |
|
Workers Compensation
|
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
|
939 |
|
Warranty Reserve
|
|
|
4,769 |
|
|
|
3,917 |
|
Income Taxes
|
|
|
10,031 |
|
|
|
1,459 |
|
Royalty and Management Fees to Mayflower plc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,776 |
|
Other
|
|
|
5,624 |
|
|
|
4,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,348 |
|
|
$ |
16,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
Related Party Transactions |
As noted in Note 1, Mayflower plc provided banking,
insurance services, and various other services to the Company.
The Company was charged $3.8 million in 2003 and
$2.8 million in 2002 related to these services. The
Companys payable with related parties related to these
services was $3.8 million as of December 31, 2003
recorded within accrued liabilities. During 2004, no services
were provided by Mayflower plc.
In addition, the Company has also advanced surplus cash funds to
its parent which resulted in a decrease of Divisional Equity of
$3.1 million, $12.7 million, and $11.1 million in
2004, 2003, and 2002.
The Company also provided various management services to South
Charleston.
As the company was part of the consolidated MVS tax return, the
provision for federal and state income taxes in these financial
statements is based on the amount of tax that would have been
provided if separate federal and state income tax returns were
filed for the Company.
A reconciliation of income taxes computed at the statutory rates
to the reported income tax provision for the years ended
December 31 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Federal provision at statutory rate
|
|
$ |
7,348 |
|
|
$ |
1,157 |
|
|
$ |
(1,893 |
) |
State taxes, net of federal benefits
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
$ |
7,865 |
|
|
$ |
1,338 |
|
|
$ |
(1,921 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes for the years ended
December 31 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Current
|
|
$ |
8,482 |
|
|
$ |
1,640 |
|
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
Deferred
|
|
|
(617 |
) |
|
|
(302 |
) |
|
|
(1,911 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
$ |
7,865 |
|
|
$ |
1,338 |
|
|
$ |
(1,921 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-49
MAYFLOWER VEHICLE SYSTEMS TRUCK GROUP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A summary of deferred income tax assets and liabilities is as
follows as of December 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Current deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$ |
228 |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
Warranty costs
|
|
|
1,548 |
|
|
|
1,289 |
|
|
Other accruals not currently deductible for tax purposes
|
|
|
5,008 |
|
|
|
4,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net current deferred assets
|
|
$ |
6,971 |
|
|
$ |
5,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization lives and methods
|
|
$ |
(4,594 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,782 |
) |
|
Pension obligations
|
|
|
2,815 |
|
|
|
2,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net noncurrent deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$ |
(1,779 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,331 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The deferred income tax provision consists of the change in the
deferred income tax assets, adjusted for tax impact of the other
comprehensive income (loss) item.
Customers that accounted for a significant portion of
consolidated revenues for the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
International
|
|
|
42.4 |
% |
|
|
30.6 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
Freightliner
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
23.6 |
|
Mack
|
|
|
24.6 |
|
|
|
27.6 |
|
|
|
40.9 |
|
Ford
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, receivables from these
customers represented 92% and 91% of total receivables,
respectively.
|
|
7. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
401(k) Plans The Company sponsors various
401(k) employee savings plans covering all eligible employees,
as defined. Eligible employees can contribute on a pretax basis
to the plan. In accordance with the terms of the 401(k) plans,
the Company elects to match a certain percentage of the
participants contributions to the plans, as defined. The
Company recognized expense, associated with these plans, of
approximately $455,000, $404,000, and $355,000 in 2004, 2003,
and 2002, respectively.
Leases The Company leases office, warehouse
space and certain equipment under operating lease agreements
that require it to pay maintenance, insurance, taxes and other
expenses in addition to annual rentals. Lease expense was
approximately $660,000, $674,000, and $870,000 in 2004, 2003,
and 2002,
F-50
MAYFLOWER VEHICLE SYSTEMS TRUCK GROUP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
respectively. Future minimum annual rental commitments at
December 31, 2004 under these leases are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
614 |
|
2006
|
|
|
325 |
|
2007
|
|
|
175 |
|
2008
|
|
|
172 |
|
2009
|
|
|
114 |
|
Litigation The Company is subject to various
legal actions and claims incidental to its business, including
those arising out of alleged defects, product warranties,
employment-related matters and environmental matters. Management
believes that the Company maintains adequate insurance to cover
these claims. The Company has established reserves for issues
that are probable and estimatable in amounts management believes
are adequate to cover reasonable adverse judgments not covered
by insurance. Based upon the information available to management
and discussions with legal counsel, it is the opinion of
management that the ultimate outcome of the various legal
actions and claims that are incidental to the Companys
business will not have a material adverse impact on the
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows of the Company; however, such matters are subject to many
uncertainties, and the outcomes of individual matters are not
predictable with assurance.
Factoring Agreement In December 2003, MVS
entered into a factoring receivable agreement with HSBC Bank.
The Companys factored receivables that are reflected as a
reduction of Accounts Receivable in the amount of
$0.2 million and $1.8 million as of December 31,
2004 and 2003, respectively.
|
|
8. |
Defined Benefit Plan and Postretirement Benefits |
Mayflower sponsors three defined benefit plans and two
postretirement benefit plans that covers certain hourly and
salaried employees. The Companys employees participate in
each of these plans. The salaried defined benefit plan and the
salaried/hourly post-retirement benefit plan include South
Charleston employees. Except as otherwise stated, the
information within the footnotes includes the total obligation
including the South Charleston salary employees, however, the
amounts recorded within the financial statements exclude an
estimate of the amounts related to South Charleston based on
actuarial allocations. The Companys policy is to make
annual contributions to the defined benefit plans to fund the
normal cost as required by federal regulations. The amounts
recorded in the accompanying consolidated financial statements
are as follows as of December 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Defined Benefit Plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid
|
|
$ |
426 |
|
|
$ |
530 |
|
|
Pension Asset
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
(7,769 |
) |
|
|
(6,666 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post Retirement Benefit Plan Liability
|
|
$ |
(3,968 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,119 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-51
MAYFLOWER VEHICLE SYSTEMS TRUCK GROUP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The change in benefit obligation, plan assets and funded status
for the three defined benefit plans as of and for the years
ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Plans | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Change in benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation beginning of year
|
|
$ |
26,500 |
|
|
$ |
25,515 |
|
|
Service costs
|
|
|
1,407 |
|
|
|
1,348 |
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
1,577 |
|
|
|
1,465 |
|
|
Plan amendments
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailments
|
|
|
(728 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(874 |
) |
|
|
(827 |
) |
|
Actuarial (gain)/ loss
|
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
|
(1,001 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
$ |
29,365 |
|
|
$ |
26,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
17,572 |
|
|
$ |
13,322 |
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
1,355 |
|
|
|
2,167 |
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
2,962 |
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(874 |
) |
|
|
(827 |
) |
|
Administrative expenses
|
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
$ |
18,900 |
|
|
$ |
17,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of funded status:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
$ |
29,365 |
|
|
$ |
26,500 |
|
|
Fair value of plan assets funded status
|
|
|
18,900 |
|
|
|
17,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
$ |
(10,465 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,928 |
) |
|
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
Unrecognized net (gain)/ loss
|
|
|
6,990 |
|
|
|
6,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Accrued pension liability)/ prepaid before minimum liability
recognition
|
|
$ |
(3,046 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,240 |
) |
|
Less: accrued pension liability related to South Charleston
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
Adjustments required to recognize minimum liability:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible asset
|
|
|
(437 |
) |
|
|
(421 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(4,419 |
) |
|
|
(3,820 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Accrued pension liability)/ prepaid pension cost after minimum
liability recognition
|
|
$ |
(7,343 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-52
MAYFLOWER VEHICLE SYSTEMS TRUCK GROUP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of net periodic benefit cost for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$ |
1,407 |
|
|
$ |
1,348 |
|
|
$ |
1,242 |
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,577 |
|
|
|
1,465 |
|
|
|
1,543 |
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(1,587 |
) |
|
|
(1,320 |
) |
|
|
(1,128 |
) |
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
Amortization gain
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$ |
1,732 |
|
|
$ |
1,797 |
|
|
$ |
1,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 Company was required to
record a minimum pension liability of approximately
$5.3 million, $4.3 million and $5.0 million,
respectively, which is included in other long-term liabilities
and accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax,
in the consolidated financial statements. The Accumulated
Benefit Obligation for the pension plans was $27.2 million
at December 31, 2004 and $24.0 million at
December 31, 2003.
The following table presents the Companys projected
benefit payments for the pension plan as of December 31,
2004 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
935 |
|
2006
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
2007
|
|
|
1,081 |
|
2008
|
|
|
1,165 |
|
2009
|
|
|
1,282 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
9,333 |
|
The following weighted-average assumptions were used to account
for the pension plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
The weighted average asset allocations of the Companys
U.S. pension assets at December 31, 2004, and 2003, by
asset category, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Fixed income
|
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
45 |
% |
Equities
|
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company employs a total return investment approach whereby a
mix of equities and fixed income investments are used to
maximize the long-term return of plan assets for a prudent level
of risk. The intent of this category is to minimize plan
expenses by outperforming plan liabilities over the long run.
Risk tolerance is established through careful consideration of
plan liabilities, plan funded status, and corporate financial
condition. The investment portfolio contains a diversified blend
of equity and fixed
F-53
MAYFLOWER VEHICLE SYSTEMS TRUCK GROUP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
income investments. Furthermore, equity investments are
diversified across U.S. and non-U.S. stocks as well as
growth, value, and small and large capitalizations. Other assets
such as real estate, private equity, and hedge funds are used
judiciously to enhance long-term returns while improving
portfolio diversification. Derivatives may be used to gain
market exposure in an efficient and timely manner; however,
derivatives may not be used to leverage the portfolio beyond the
market value of the underlying investments. Investment risk is
measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through annual
liability measurements, periodic asset/liability studies, and
quarterly investment portfolio reviews. The Company expects to
contribute $1.049 million to its pension plans in 2005.
In addition, the Company has a postretirement medical benefit
plan for certain retirees and their dependents of the
U.S. operations, and has recorded a liability for its
estimated obligation under this plan.
Below is information related to post-retirement benefits other
than pension:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retiree Medical | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Change in benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation beginning of year
|
|
$ |
5,383 |
|
|
$ |
6,756 |
|
|
Experience (gain)/ loss
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
(2,080 |
) |
|
Change in actuarial assumptions
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
Benefit accumulation
|
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
612 |
|
|
Paid claims
|
|
|
(660 |
) |
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
Plan settlement or curtailment (South Charleston)
|
|
|
(1,042 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation end of year
|
|
$ |
4,534 |
|
|
$ |
5,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial statement disclosure:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unfunded accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
$ |
4,534 |
|
|
$ |
5,383 |
|
|
Unrecognized prior service (cost) benefit
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
Unrecognized net loss
|
|
|
(654 |
) |
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued postretirement cost
|
|
|
3,968 |
|
|
|
5,125 |
|
|
Less: amount related to South Charleston
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,006 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,968 |
|
|
$ |
4,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of accrued cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued cost beginning of year
|
|
$ |
5,126 |
|
|
$ |
4,770 |
|
|
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost for period
|
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
|
Actual net employers paid claims
|
|
|
(660 |
) |
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
Plan settlement or curtailment (South Charleston)
|
|
|
(1,042 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued costs end of period
|
|
$ |
3,968 |
|
|
$ |
5,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
F-54
MAYFLOWER VEHICLE SYSTEMS TRUCK GROUP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of net periodic benefit cost for the retiree
medical plans for the years ended December 31 2004, 2003
and 2002 are as follows (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$ |
287 |
|
|
$ |
330 |
|
|
$ |
391 |
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
Net amortization
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$ |
544 |
|
|
$ |
592 |
|
|
$ |
843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaried Retiree Medical Plan: Employer cost adjustments will
not be greater than 4% per year.
Norwalk Hourly Retiree Medical Plan: For measurement purposes, a
13% annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered
health care benefits was assumed for 2002. The rate was assumed
to decrease gradually to 5.5% through 2010 and remain constant
thereafter. Assumed health care cost trend rates can have a
significant effect on the amounts reported for postretirement
medical benefit plans. A one percentage point change in assumed
health care cost impacts on total service and interest cost
components or on the postretirement benefit obligation by
$115,000.
F-55
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
ITEM 13. Other Expenses of
Issuance and Distribution.
The following is a statement of estimated expenses, to be paid
solely by the Registrant, of the issuance and distribution of
the securities being registered hereby:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities and Exchange Commission registration fee
|
|
$ |
20,263 |
|
NASD filing fee
|
|
|
17,745 |
|
Blue sky fees and expenses (including attorneys fees and
expenses)
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
Printing expenses
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
Accounting fees and expenses
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
Transfer agents fees and expenses
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
Legal fees and expenses
|
|
|
450,000 |
|
Miscellaneous expenses
|
|
|
11,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 14. Indemnification of
Directors and Officers.
The Registrant is incorporated under the laws of the State of
Delaware. Section 145 (Section 145) of the
Delaware General Corporation Law, as the same exists or may
hereafter be amended (the DGCL), provides that a
Delaware corporation may indemnify any persons who were, are or
are threatened to be made, parties to any threatened, pending or
completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal,
administrative or investigative (other than an action by or in
the right of such corporation), by reason of the fact that such
person is or was an officer, director, employee or agent of such
corporation, or is or was serving at the request of such
corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another
corporation or enterprise. The indemnity may include expenses
(including attorneys fees), judgments, fines and amounts
paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by such
person in connection with such action, suit or proceeding,
provided such person acted in good faith and in a manner he
reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the
corporations best interests and, with respect to any
criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to
believe that his conduct was illegal. A Delaware corporation may
indemnify any persons who are, were or are threatened to be
made, a party to any threatened, pending or completed action or
suit by or in the right of the corporation by reasons of the
fact that such person was a director, officer, employee or agent
of such corporation, or is or was serving at the request of such
corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another
corporation or enterprise. The indemnity may include expenses
(including attorneys fees) actually and reasonably
incurred by such person in connection with the defense or
settlement of such action or suit, provided such person acted in
good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in or
not opposed to the corporations best interests, provided
that no indemnification is permitted without judicial approval
if the officer, director, employee or agent is adjudged to be
liable to the corporation. Where an officer, director, employee
or agent is successful on the merits or otherwise in the defense
of any action referred to above, the corporation must indemnify
him against the expenses which such officer or director has
actually and reasonably incurred.
Section 145 further authorizes a corporation to purchase
and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a
director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is
or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director,
officer, employee or agent of another corporation or enterprise,
against any liability asserted against him and incurred by him
in any such capacity, arising out of his
II-1
status as such, whether or not the corporation would otherwise
have the power to indemnify him under Section 145.
The Registrants certificate of incorporation provides that
to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL and except as
otherwise provided in its by-laws, none of the Registrants
directors shall be liable to it or its stockholders for monetary
damages for a breach of fiduciary duty. In addition, the
Registrants certificate of incorporation provides for
indemnification of any person who was or is made or threatened
to be made a party to any action, suit or other proceeding,
whether criminal, civil, administrative or investigative,
because of his or her status as a director or officer of the
Registrant, or service as a director, officer, employee or agent
of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or
other enterprise at the request of the Registrant to the fullest
extent authorized under the DGCL against all expenses,
liabilities and losses reasonably incurred by such person.
Further, all of the directors and officers of the Registrant are
covered by insurance policies maintained and held in effect by
the Registrants against certain liabilities for actions taken in
their capacities as such, including liabilities under the
Securities Act.
ITEM 15. Recent Sales of
Unregistered Securities.
During the last three years, we have issued securities in the
following transactions, each of which was exempt from the
registration requirements of the Securities Act. No underwriters
were involved in any of the below-referenced sales of
securities. The historical share data set forth in this section
has not been adjusted to reflect the stock split that is
expected to be effected prior to the completion of this offering.
On September 30, 2002, we borrowed an aggregate of
$2.5 million through the issuance of subordinated
promissory notes to certain of our principal stockholders and
their affiliated entities. These notes bear interest at a rate
of 12% per annum and have a maturity date of
September 30, 2006. Interest on the notes is payable in
kind in a monthly basis.
On March 28, 2003, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of
Merger whereby a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company was
merged into CVS. The holders of the outstanding shares of CVS
received, in exchange, shares of the Company on a one-for-one
basis, resulting in the issuance of 2,917 shares of our
Class A Common Stock, 50,000 shares of our
Class B Common Stock, 12,500 shares of our
Class C Common Stock, 47,593 shares of our
Class D-1 Common Stock and 11,898 shares of our
Class E Common Stock. The number of shares of our common
stock issued to the former holders of CVS common stock was based
on the relative value of the two businesses at the time of the
execution of the merger agreement. Customary valuation
methodologies were utilized to determine such relative values.
On May 20, 2004, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of
Merger whereby a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company was
merged into Trim Systems, Inc. Pursuant to the merger, the
holders of the outstanding shares and warrants of Trim Systems
received shares of the Company on a .099-for-one basis,
resulting in the issuance of 41,626.56 shares of our
Class A Common Stock, 27,932.06 shares of our
Class B Common Stock and 5,568.75 shares of our
Class C Common Stock. The exchange ratio was established
based on the relative value of the two businesses at the time of
the execution of the merger agreement. Customary valuation
methodologies were utilized to determine such relative values.
In August 2004, in connection with our initial public offering,
we reclassified our previously outstanding six classes of common
stock into one class of common stock and, also in connection
therewith, we effected a 38.991-to-one stock split, which
resulted in the issuance of 16,988,751 shares of our new
common stock to our stockholders in exchange for all of their
shares of our then outstanding six classes of common stock.
The sales of the above securities were exempt from the
registration requirements of the Securities Act in reliance on
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act promulgated thereunder
as transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering.
II-2
ITEM 16. Exhibits and
Financial Statement Schedules.
Exhibits.
The attached Exhibit Index is incorporated by reference
herein.
Financial Statement Schedules.
The following financial statement schedules are included in this
Registration Statement:
|
|
|
Schedule II: Valuation and Qualifying Accounts |
All other schedules for which provision is made in the
applicable accounting regulations of the Commission are not
required under the related instructions, are inapplicable or not
material, or the information called for thereby is otherwise
included in the financial statements and therefore has been
omitted.
ITEM 17. Undertakings.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and
controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to provisions
described in Item 14 above, or otherwise, the Registrant
has been advised that in the opinion of the SEC such
indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the
Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event
that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other
than the payment by the Registrant of expenses incurred or paid
by a director, officer or controlling person of the Registrant
in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is
asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in
connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant
will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been
settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of
appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such
indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in
the Securities Act and will be governed by the final
adjudication of such issue.
The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes that:
For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities
Act, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed
as part of this registration statement in reliance upon
Rule 430A and contained in the form of prospectus filed by
the Registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or
497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of
this registration statement as of the time it was declared
effective.
For the purpose of determining any liability under the
Securities Act, each post-effective amendment that contains a
form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration
statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the
offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be
the initial bona fide offering thereof.
The undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the
underwriters at the closing specified in the Underwriting
Agreement, certificates in such denominations and registered in
such names as required by the underwriters to permit prompt
delivery to each purchaser.
II-3
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933,
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. has duly caused this Amendment
No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the City of New Albany, State of Ohio, on
June 16, 2005.
|
|
|
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. |
|
|
|
|
Title: |
President and Chief |
* * *
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on
Form S-1 has been signed by the following persons in the
capacities indicated on June 16, 2005.
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
|
|
|
*
Scott
D. Rued |
|
Chairman and Director |
|
/s/ Mervin Dunn
Mervin
Dunn |
|
President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
and Director |
|
/s/ Chad M. Utrup
Chad
M. Utrup |
|
Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
*
S.A.
Johnson |
|
Director |
|
*
Eric
J. Rosen |
|
Director |
|
*
David
R. Bovee |
|
Director |
|
*
Richard
A. Snell |
|
Director |
|
|
* |
The undersigned by signing his name hereto, does sign and
execute this Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement
on Form S-1 pursuant to the power of attorney executed by the
above-named officers and directors of Commercial Vehicle Group,
Inc. and previously filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. |
|
|
|
By: /s/ Mervin
Dunn
Mervin
Dunn, Attorney-in-Fact |
|
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
1 |
.1* |
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement. |
|
2 |
.1 |
|
Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated February 7, 2004, by
and among, CVG Acquisition LLC, Mayflower Vehicle Systems, Inc.,
Mayflower Vehicle Systems Michigan, Inc., Wayne Stamping and
Assembly LLC and Wayne-Orrville Investments LLC (incorporated by
reference to the Companys annual report on Form 10-K
(File No. 000-50890), filed on March 15, 2005). |
|
2 |
.2 |
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 3, 2005, by and
between Monona Holdings LLC and Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to the Companys current report
on Form 8-K (File No. 000-50890), filed on
June 8, 2005). |
|
3 |
.1 |
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Commercial
Vehicle Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the
Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q (File
No. 000-50890), filed on September 17, 2004). |
|
3 |
.2 |
|
Amended and Restated By-laws of Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to the Companys quarterly
report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-50890), filed
on September 17, 2004). |
|
4 |
.1 |
|
Registration Agreement, dated October 5, 2000, by and among
Bostrom Holding, Inc. and the investors listed on
Schedule A attached thereto (incorporated by reference to
the Companys registration statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-15708), filed on May 21, 2004). |
|
4 |
.2 |
|
Joinder to Registration Agreement, dated as of March 28,
2003, by and among Bostrom Holding, Inc. and J2R Partners VI,
CVS Partners, LP and CVS Executive Investco LLC (incorporated by
reference to the Companys registration statement on
Form S-1 (File No. 333-15708), filed on May 21,
2004). |
|
4 |
.3 |
|
Joinder to the Registration Agreement, dated as of May 20,
2004, by and among Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and the prior
stockholders of Trim Systems (incorporated by reference to the
Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q (File
No. 000-50890), filed on September 17, 2004). |
|
4 |
.4 |
|
Form of Certificate of Common Stock of Commercial Vehicle Group,
Inc. (incorporated by reference to the Companys
registration statement on Form S-1
(File No 333-15708), filed on May 21, 2004). |
|
5 |
.1** |
|
Opinion of Kirkland & Ellis LLP. |
|
10 |
.1 |
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of
March 28, 2003, by and among Commercial Vehicle Systems
Limited, KAB Seating Limited, National Seating Company,
Commercial Vehicle Systems, Inc., CVS Holdings, Inc., Bostrom
Holding, Inc., the several financial institutions from time to
time party to this agreement (the Lenders), Fleet
National Bank, as an Issuer and Bank of America, N.A., as
administrative agent for the Lenders, Collateral Agent, Swing
Line Lender and an Issuer (incorporated by reference to the
Companys registration statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-15708), filed on May 21, 2004). |
|
10 |
.2 |
|
Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated as of
October 29, 1998, by and among Trim Systems Operating Corp,
Tempress, Inc., Trim Systems, LLC, the financial institutions
from time to time signatory thereto (the Banks) and
Comerica Bank, as agent for the Banks (incorporated by reference
to the Companys registration statement on Form S-1
(File No. 333-15708), filed on May 21, 2004). |
|
10 |
.3 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to Revolving Credit and Term Loan
Agreement, dated as of December 31, 1998, by and among the
lenders signatory thereto, Comerica Bank as agent for the Banks,
Trim Systems Operating Corp., Tempress, Inc. and Trim Systems
LLC (incorporated by reference to the Companys
registration statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-15708), filed on May 21, 2004). |
|
10 |
.4 |
|
Amendment No. 2 to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement
and Waiver, dated as of November 22, 1999, by and among
U.S. Bank National Association, as co-agent, Bank One,
N.A., as co-agent, Comerica Bank as agent for the Banks, Trim
Systems Operating Corp., Tempress, Inc. and Trim Systems LLC
(incorporated by reference to the Companys registration
statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-15708), filed on
May 21, 2004). |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
10 |
.5 |
|
Amendment No. 3 to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement
and Waiver, dated as of June 28, 2001, by and among the
lenders signatory thereto, Comerica Bank as agent for the Banks,
Trim Systems Operating Corp., Tempress, Inc. and Trim Systems
LLC (incorporated by reference to the Companys
registration statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-15708), filed on May 21, 2004). |
|
10 |
.6 |
|
Assignment and Waiver Agreement, dated as of June 28, 2001,
by and among Trim Systems Operating Corp, Tempress, Inc., Trim
Systems, LLC, U.S. Bank National Association, Bank One, NA,
Comerica Bank, 1363880 Ontario Inc. and J2R Partners II-B,
LLC (incorporated by reference to the Companys
registration statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-15708), filed on May 21, 2004). |
|
10 |
.7 |
|
Amendment No. 4 to Revolving Credit and Term Loan
Agreement, dated as of November 13, 2002, by and among the
lenders signatory thereto, Comerica Bank as agent for the Banks,
Trim Systems Operating Corp., Tempress, Inc. and Trim Systems
LLC (incorporated by reference to the Companys
registration statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-15708), filed on May 21, 2004). |
|
10 |
.8 |
|
Amendment No. 5 to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement
and Waiver dated as of February 2004, by and among the lenders
signatory thereto, Comerica Bank as agent for the Banks, Trim
Systems Operating Corp., Tempress, Inc. and Trim Systems LLC,
(incorporated by reference to the Companys registration
statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-15708), filed on
May 21, 2004). |
|
10 |
.9 |
|
Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated as of
August 10, 2004, by and among Commercial Vehicle Group,
Inc., the subsidiary borrowers from time to time parties
thereto, the foreign currency borrowers from time to time
parties thereto, the banks from time to time parties thereto,
U.S. Bank National Association, one of the banks, as
administrative agent for the banks and Comerica Bank, one of the
banks, as syndication agent for the banks (incorporated by
reference to the Companys quarterly report on
Form 10-Q (File No. 000-50890), filed on
September 17, 2004). |
|
10 |
.10 |
|
First Amendment to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement,
dated as of September 16, 2004, by and among Commercial
Vehicle Group, Inc., the subsidiary borrowers from time to time
parties thereto, the foreign currency borrowers from time to
time parties thereto, the banks from time to time parties
thereto, U.S. Bank National Association, one of the banks,
as administrative agent for the banks and Comerica Bank, one of
the banks, as syndication agent for the banks (incorporated by
reference to the Companys annual report on Form 10-K
(File No. 000-50890), filed on March 15, 2005). |
|
10 |
.11 |
|
Second Amendment to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement,
dated as of February 7, 2005, by and among Commercial
Vehicle Group, Inc., the subsidiary borrowers from time to time
parties thereto, the foreign currency borrowers from time to
time parties thereto, the banks from time to time parties
thereto, U.S. Bank National Association, one of the banks,
as administrative agent for the banks and Comerica Bank, one of
the banks, as syndication agent for the banks (incorporated by
reference to the Companys annual report on Form 10-K
(File No. 000-50890), filed on March 15, 2005). |
|
10 |
.12 |
|
Third Amendment to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement,
dated as of June 3, 2005, by and among Commercial Vehicle
Group, Inc., the subsidiary borrowers from time to time parties
thereto, the foreign currency borrowers from time to time
parties thereto, the banks from time to time parties thereto,
U.S. Bank National Association, one of the banks, as
administrative agent for the banks and Comerica Bank, one of the
banks, as syndication agent for the banks (incorporated by
reference to the Companys current report on Form 8-K
(File No. 000-50890), filed on June 8, 2005). |
|
10 |
.13 |
|
Investor Stockholders Agreement, dated October 5, 2000, by
and among Bostrom Holding, Inc., Onex American Holdings LLC, J2R
Partners VII and the stockholders listed on the signature pages
thereto (incorporated by reference to the Companys
registration statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-15708), filed on May 21, 2004. |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
10 |
.14 |
|
Investor Stockholders Joinder Agreement, dated as of
March 28, 2003, by and among Bostrom Holding, Inc. and J2R
Partners VI, CVS Partners, LP and CVS Executive Investco LLC
(incorporated by reference to the Companys registration
statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-15708), filed on
May 21, 2004). |
|
10 |
.15 |
|
Joinder to the Investor Stockholders Agreement by and among
Bostrom Holding, Inc. and the prior stockholders of Trim Systems
(incorporated by reference to the Companys registration
statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-15708), filed on
May 21, 2004). |
|
10 |
.16 |
|
Management Stockholders Agreement, dated as of August 9,
2004, by and among Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc., Onex American
Holdings II LLC and the individuals named on
Schedule I thereto (incorporated by reference to the
Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-
50890), filed on September 17, 2004). |
|
10 |
.17 |
|
Note Purchase Agreement, dated September 30, 2002, by
and among Bostrom Holding, Inc., Baird Capital Partners II
Limited, BCP II Affiliates Fund Limited Partnership,
Baird Capital II Limited Partnership, Baird Capital
Partners III Limited Partnership, BCP III Special
Affiliates Limited Partnership, BCP III Affiliates
Fund Limited Partnership, Norwest Equity Partners VII, LP
and Hidden Creek Industries (incorporated by reference to the
Companys registration statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-15708), filed on May 21, 2004). |
|
10 |
.18 |
|
Form of Subordinated Promissory Note issued by Bostrom Holding,
Inc. in favor of each of BCP II Affiliates
Fund Limited Partnership, Baird Capital II Limited
Partnership, Baird Capital Partners III Limited
Partnership, BCP III Special Affiliates Limited Partnership
BCP III Affiliates Fund Limited Partnership, Norwest
Equity Partners VII, LP and Hidden Creek Industries
(incorporated by reference to the Companys registration
statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-15708), filed on
May 21, 2004). |
|
10 |
.19 |
|
Promissory Note, dated as of June 28, 2001, issued by Trim
Systems Operating Corp. in favor of 1363880 Ontario Inc., in the
amount of $6,850,000 (incorporated by reference to the
Companys registration statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-15708), filed on May 21, 2004). |
|
10 |
.20 |
|
Promissory Note, dated as of June 28, 2001, issued by Trim
Systems Operating Corp. in favor of J2R Partners II-B, LLC,
in the amount of $150,000 (incorporated by reference to the
Companys registration statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-15708), filed on May 21, 2004). |
|
10 |
.21 |
|
Bostrom Holding, Inc. Management Stock Option Plan (incorporated
by reference to the Companys registration statement on
Form S-1 (File No. 333-15708), filed on May 21,
2004). |
|
10 |
.22 |
|
Form of Grant of Nonqualified Stock Option pursuant to the
Bostrom Holding, Inc. Management Stock Option Plan (incorporated
by reference to the Companys registration statement on
Form S-1 (File No. 333-15708), filed on May 21,
2004). |
|
10 |
.23 |
|
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. Amended and Restated Equity
Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the Companys
quarterly report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-59890),
filed on May 11, 2005). |
|
10 |
.24 |
|
Form of Grant of Nonqualified Stock Option pursuant to the
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to the Companys annual report
on Form 10-K (File No. 000-50890), filed on
March 15, 2005). |
|
10 |
.25 |
|
Employment agreement, dated as of May 16, 1997, with Donald
P. Lorraine (incorporated by reference to the Companys
registration statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-15708), filed on May 21, 2004). |
|
10 |
.26 |
|
Recapitalization Agreement, dated as of August 4, 2004, by
and among Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and the stockholders
listed on the signature pages thereto (incorporated by reference
to the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q (File
No. 000-50890), filed on September 17, 2004). |
|
10 |
.27 |
|
Form of Non-Competition Agreement (incorporated by reference to
the Companys registration statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-15708), filed on May 21, 2004). |
|
10 |
.28 |
|
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. 2005 Bonus Plan (incorporated by
reference to the Companys current report on Form 8-K
(File No. 000-50890), filed on February 7, 2005). |
|
10 |
.29** |
|
Service Agreement, dated March 1, 1993, between Motor
Panels (Coventry) Plc and William Gordon Boyd. |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
10 |
.30** |
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated as of June 1,
2004, between Mayflower Vehicle Systems Plc and Mayflower
Vehicle Systems, Inc. |
|
21 |
.1** |
|
Subsidiaries of Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. |
|
23 |
.1 |
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP. |
|
23 |
.2 |
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. |
|
23 |
.3** |
|
Consent of Kirkland & Ellis LLP (included in
Exhibit 5.1). |
|
24 |
.1** |
|
Powers of Attorney (included in Part II of the Registration
Statement). |
|
|
* |
To be filed by amendment. |