Veramark Technologies, Inc. 10-Q
FORM 10-Q
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For Quarter Ended June 30, 2005
Commission File Number 0-13898
Veramark Technologies, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
16-1192368 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation
or Organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification Number) |
3750 Monroe Avenue, Pittsford, NY 14534
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
(585) 381-6000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirement for the past 90 days.
YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of
the Act).
YES o NO þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
June 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $.10
|
|
8,770,904 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This report consists of 29 pages. |
|
|
PART
I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
VERAMARK TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
688,919 |
|
|
$ |
722,020 |
|
Investments |
|
|
391,381 |
|
|
|
381,237 |
|
Accounts receivable, trade (net
of allowance for doubtful accounts
of $25,000 and $24,000, respectively) |
|
|
1,383,382 |
|
|
|
1,276,204 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
40,702 |
|
|
|
30,717 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
136,289 |
|
|
|
109,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets |
|
|
2,640,673 |
|
|
|
2,519,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
5,718,365 |
|
|
|
5,740,535 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(4,910,087 |
) |
|
|
(4,846,475 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment (Net) |
|
|
808,278 |
|
|
|
894,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software development costs (net of
accumulated amortization of $1,909,303
and $1,506,777, respectively) |
|
|
2,772,575 |
|
|
|
2,518,482 |
|
Pension and related assets |
|
|
2,849,467 |
|
|
|
2,778,482 |
|
Deposits and other assets |
|
|
797,745 |
|
|
|
797,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
6,419,787 |
|
|
|
6,094,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
9,868,738 |
|
|
$ |
9,508,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
VERAMARK TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
234,526 |
|
|
$ |
298,063 |
|
Accrued compensation and related taxes |
|
|
449,232 |
|
|
|
557,805 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
2,672,741 |
|
|
|
2,572,120 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
178,282 |
|
|
|
187,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
|
3,534,781 |
|
|
|
3,615,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension obligation |
|
|
4,761,333 |
|
|
|
4,439,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
8,296,114 |
|
|
|
8,055,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $.10; shares authorized,
40,000,000; shares issued and outstanding
8,851,129 and 8,749,179 |
|
|
885,113 |
|
|
|
874,918 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
21,684,196 |
|
|
|
21,744,969 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(20,630,691 |
) |
|
|
(20,795,128 |
) |
Treasury stock (80,225 shares, at cost) |
|
|
(385,757 |
) |
|
|
(385,757 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
19,763 |
|
|
|
14,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
|
1,572,624 |
|
|
|
1,453,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
9,868,738 |
|
|
$ |
9,508,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
VERAMARK TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
NET SALES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Sales |
|
$ |
880,053 |
|
|
$ |
794,358 |
|
|
$ |
1,834,636 |
|
|
$ |
1,737,457 |
|
Service Sales |
|
|
1,781,303 |
|
|
|
1,773,241 |
|
|
|
3,453,092 |
|
|
|
3,503,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Net Sales |
|
|
2,661,356 |
|
|
|
2,567,599 |
|
|
|
5,287,728 |
|
|
|
5,241,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COSTS AND OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
439,884 |
|
|
|
475,632 |
|
|
|
879,935 |
|
|
|
856,119 |
|
Engineering and software development |
|
|
178,995 |
|
|
|
573,653 |
|
|
|
480,787 |
|
|
|
811,701 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
1,797,889 |
|
|
|
2,032,556 |
|
|
|
3,768,996 |
|
|
|
4,071,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Costs and Operating Expenses |
|
|
2,416,768 |
|
|
|
3,081,841 |
|
|
|
5,129,718 |
|
|
|
5,739,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS |
|
|
244,588 |
|
|
|
(514,242 |
) |
|
|
158,010 |
|
|
|
(498,270 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INTEREST INCOME (Expense) |
|
|
5,135 |
|
|
|
(7,144 |
) |
|
|
6,427 |
|
|
|
2,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
|
249,723 |
|
|
|
(521,386 |
) |
|
|
164,437 |
|
|
|
(495,848 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME TAXES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
|
$ |
249,723 |
|
|
$ |
(521,386 |
) |
|
$ |
164,437 |
|
|
$ |
(495,848 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
VERAMARK TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
164,437 |
|
|
$ |
(495,848 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows
provided by operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
537,725 |
|
|
|
388,630 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
(5,776 |
) |
|
|
(7,707 |
) |
Loss on disposal of fixed assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,548 |
|
Compensation expense-stock options |
|
|
(98,039 |
) |
|
|
9,200 |
|
Increase in cash surrender value of company-owned life insurance
policies |
|
|
(70,985 |
) |
|
|
(70,985 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(101,402 |
) |
|
|
92,645 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(9,985 |
) |
|
|
1,592 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(26,480 |
) |
|
|
30,410 |
|
Deposits and other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,929 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(63,537 |
) |
|
|
130,315 |
|
Accrued compensation and related taxes |
|
|
(108,573 |
) |
|
|
(125,905 |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
100,621 |
|
|
|
(117,470 |
) |
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
(9,695 |
) |
|
|
(55,635 |
) |
Pension obligation |
|
|
321,935 |
|
|
|
204,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by operating activities |
|
|
630,246 |
|
|
|
36,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale (purchase) of investments |
|
|
(4,772 |
) |
|
|
436,123 |
|
Capitalized software development costs |
|
|
(656,619 |
) |
|
|
(589,061 |
) |
Additions to property and equipment |
|
|
(49,417 |
) |
|
|
(85,006 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows used by investing activities: |
|
|
(710,808 |
) |
|
|
(237,944 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
47,461 |
|
|
|
22,980 |
|
Repayment of capital lease obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,472 |
) |
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by financing activities |
|
|
47,461 |
|
|
|
27,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(33,101 |
) |
|
|
(173,827 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
|
722,020 |
|
|
|
644,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
688,919 |
|
|
$ |
470,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid (received), net |
|
$ |
(3,000 |
) |
|
$ |
25,123 |
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
755 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
7
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The accompanying unaudited financial statements include all adjustments of a normal and
recurring nature which, in the opinion of Companys management, are necessary to present fairly the
Companys financial position as of June 30, 2005 the results of its operations for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and
2004.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been omitted pursuant to
the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. These condensed financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes contained
in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year
ended December 31, 2004.
The results of operations and cash flows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 are
not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full years operation.
(2) |
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT |
The major classifications of property and equipment at June 30, 2005, and December 31, 2004
were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Machinery and equipment |
|
$ |
794,314 |
|
|
$ |
794,314 |
|
Computer hardware and software |
|
|
1,913,815 |
|
|
|
1,935,985 |
|
Furniture and fixtures |
|
|
1,627,677 |
|
|
|
1,627,677 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
1,382,559 |
|
|
|
1,382,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,718,365 |
|
|
$ |
5,740,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, the Company recorded depreciation expense
of $67,444 and $135,199. Depreciation expense for the three and six months ended June 30,
2004 were $72,615 and $141,312. |
|
(3) |
|
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION |
|
|
|
In 2002, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 148,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure. This standard provides
alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of
accounting for stock-based employee compensation. Additionally, the standard also requires
prominent disclosures in the Companys financial statements about the method of accounting
used for stock-based employee compensation, and the effect of the method used when reporting
financial results. |
8
|
|
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. As permitted by SFAS No. 123, the Company
continues to measure compensation for such plans using the intrinsic value based method of
accounting, prescribed by Accounting Principles Board (APB), Opinion No. 25, Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees. Had compensation cost for the Companys stock-based compensation
plans been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates for awards consistent with
the method of SFAS No. 123, the Companys net income (loss) and net income (loss) per common
share would have been adjusted to the pro forma amounts indicated below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
As reported |
|
$ |
249,723 |
|
|
$ |
(521,386 |
) |
|
$ |
164,437 |
|
|
$ |
(495,848 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: total
stock-based
compensation
expense included in
net income, net of
related tax effects |
|
|
|
|
(102,082 |
) |
|
|
(6,047 |
) |
|
|
(98,038 |
) |
|
|
9,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduct: total
stock-based
compensation
expense determined
under fair value,
net of related tax
effects |
|
|
|
|
(460 |
) |
|
|
(77,729 |
) |
|
|
(36,006 |
) |
|
|
(184,715 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
147,181 |
|
|
$ |
(605,162 |
) |
|
$ |
30,393 |
|
|
$ |
(671,362 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share |
|
As reported |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For purposes of the disclosure above, the fair value of each option grant is estimated on the
date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following
weighted-average assumptions used for grants in 2005 and 2004: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility |
|
|
149.79 |
% |
|
|
144.43 |
% |
|
|
149.79 |
% |
|
|
144.43 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
3.27 |
% |
Expected life |
|
5 years |
|
5 years |
|
5 years |
|
5 years |
For the six months ended June 30, 2005, no stock options have been granted.
9
(4) |
|
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) |
Total comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
249,723 |
|
|
$ |
(521,386 |
) |
|
$ |
164,437 |
|
|
$ |
(495,848 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive
income |
|
|
3,835 |
|
|
|
(6,193 |
) |
|
|
5,372 |
|
|
|
(1,528 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
253,558 |
|
|
$ |
(527,579 |
) |
|
$ |
169,809 |
|
|
$ |
(497,376 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) |
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE (EPS) |
|
|
|
SFAS 128 Earnings Per Share requires the Company to calculate net income (loss) per share
based on basic and diluted net income (loss) per share, as defined. Basic EPS excludes
dilution and is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of
shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could
occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into
common stock. The dilutive effect of outstanding options issued by the Company are reflected
in diluted EPS using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, options
will only have a dilutive effect when the average market price of common stock during the
period exceeds the exercise price of the options. |
10
Calculations of Earnings (Loss) Per Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
249,723 |
|
|
$ |
(521,386 |
) |
|
$ |
164,437 |
|
|
$ |
(495,848 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
8,731,852 |
|
|
|
8,578,431 |
|
|
|
8,702,925 |
|
|
|
8,570,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
.02 |
|
|
$ |
(.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
249,723 |
|
|
$ |
(521,386 |
) |
|
$ |
164,437 |
|
|
$ |
(495,848 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
8,731,852 |
|
|
|
8,578,431 |
|
|
|
8,702,925 |
|
|
|
8,570,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional dilutive effect of stock options
and warrants after application of treasury
stock method |
|
|
635,728 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
758,647 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average dilutive shares outstanding |
|
|
9,367,580 |
|
|
|
8,578,431 |
|
|
|
9,461,572 |
|
|
|
8,570,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share assuming
full obligation |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
There were no dilutive effects of stock options in 2004, as the effect would have been
anti-dilutive due to the net loss incurred. |
(6) |
|
INDEMNIFICATION OF CUSTOMERS |
|
|
|
Our agreements with customers generally require us to indemnify the customer against claims
that our software infringes third party patent, copyright, trademark or other proprietary
rights. Such indemnification obligations are generally limited in a variety of
industry-standard respects, including our right to replace an infringing product. As of June
30, 2005 we had not experienced any material losses related to these indemnification
obligations and no material claims with respect thereto were outstanding. We do not expect
significant claims related to these indemnification obligations, and consequently, we have
not established any related reserves. |
11
(7) |
|
BENEFIT PLANS |
|
|
|
The Company sponsors an employee incentive savings plan under Section 401(k) for all eligible
employees. The Companys contributions to the plan are discretionary. There were no
contributions to the plan for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004. |
|
|
|
The Company also sponsors an unfunded Supplemental Executive Retirement Program (SERP),
which is a non-qualified plan that provides certain key employees defined pension benefits.
Periodic pension expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 consisted
of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Current Service Cost |
|
$ |
114,244 |
|
|
$ |
74,693 |
|
|
$ |
228,492 |
|
|
$ |
149,386 |
|
Amortization of
Prior Service Cost |
|
|
22,650 |
|
|
|
21,721 |
|
|
|
45,300 |
|
|
|
43,442 |
|
Interest Cost |
|
|
65,605 |
|
|
|
47,337 |
|
|
|
131,210 |
|
|
|
94,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Expense |
|
$ |
202,499 |
|
|
$ |
143,751 |
|
|
$ |
405,002 |
|
|
$ |
287,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company paid pension obligations of $83,067 for both the six months ended June 30, 2005
and 2004. |
|
|
|
The discount rate used in determining the actuarial present value of the projected benefit
obligation was 6% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004. |
|
|
|
The Company maintains life insurance covering certain key employees under its Supplemental
Executive Retirement Program with the Company named as beneficiary. The Company intends to
use the death benefits of these policies, as well as loans against the accumulating cash
surrender value of the policies, to fund the pension obligation. The total death benefit
associated with these policies is $10.2 million, with an associated accumulated cash
surrender value of approximately $2,285,000 at June 30, 2005. The accumulated cash surrender
values of these policies at December 31, 2004 was approximately $2,214,000. |
12
Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Results of Operations
Managements Discussion and Analysis contains statements that are forward-looking. Such
statements are identified by the use of words like plans, expects, intends, believes,
will, anticipates, estimates and other words of similar meaning in conjunction with, among
other things, discussions of future operations, financial performance, the Companys strategy for
growth, product development, regulatory approvals, market position and expenditures.
Forward-looking statements are based on managements expectations as of the date of this report.
The Company cannot guarantee that any forward-looking statement will be accurate, although the
Company believes that it has been reasonable in its expectations and assumptions. Forward-looking
statements are subject to the risks identified in Issues and Risks and elsewhere in this report.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements and are advised to
review the risks identified in Issues and Risks and elsewhere in this report. The Company has no
obligation to update forward-looking statements.
Overview
Sales for the companys second quarter ended June 30, 2005 were $2,661,000, an increase of 4%
from sales of $2,568,000 for the second quarter of 2004. Sales for the six months ended June 30,
2005 of $5,288,000 increased 1% from sales of $5,241,000 for the first six months of 2004.
Our net income of $250,000, or $0.03 per diluted share, earned for the three months ended June
30, 2005 was an improvement from the net loss of $521,000, or $0.06 per share, incurred for the
same quarter of 2004. For the six months ended June 30, 2005 we have realized a net income of
$164,000, or $0.02 per diluted share. For the six months ended June 30, 2004 we had incurred a net
loss of $496,000, or $0.06 per share. The increased net income for both the three and six months
ended June 30, 2005 versus the same periods of 2004 results from the combination of increased
sales, reductions in operating expense levels, and an increase in the capitalization of software
development costs.
Orders booked for the second quarter of 2005 increased 18% from orders booked for the first
quarter of 2005, with the majority of that increase attributable to orders of our VeraSMART
enterprise level product. Major orders for VeraSMART received during the second quarter included
Wells Fargo Financial, Orange County Info Systems in Orlando Florida, Tiffany and Company, Highmark
Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Pittsburgh, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and
Ameriquest Loan Services. Revenues associated with these orders are expected to extend into the
third and fourth quarters of the year, and beyond.
In terms of liquidity, we generated a positive cash flow of $103,000 for quarter ended June
30, 2005 and realized an increase of $33,000 in accounts receivable from March 31, 2005. As
compared with June 30, 2004, total cash and receivables have increased by $190,000.
Sales
Sales of enterprise level products, consisting of new software and service revenues from
VeraSMART and the ongoing maintenance revenue from Quantum, VeraSMARTs predecessor enterprise
product increased 30% for the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared with the same three
month period ended June 30, 2004. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, sales and service
revenues from VeraSMART and Quantum increased 8% from the first six months of 2004. Quote activity
for the VeraSMART product has increased
13
markedly from the levels seen in the first quarter of this year and we remain optimistic of
increasing revenues from VeraSMART for the balance of 2005. Current development efforts on
VeraSMART 4.0 which will further expand the VeraSMART offering by encompassing a series of new
operational support modules, including Work Order capability, continues on schedule for a late
third quarter 2005 release. With the release of VeraSMART 4.0, we will have the ability to
penetrate markets and provide business solutions outside of what has been our traditional
telemanagement-related area of focus. Sales of enterprise level products and services accounted for
35% of second quarter revenues and 33% of year to date revenues, up from 27% and 32%, respectively,
from the same three and six month periods of 2004.
Sales and service revenues generated by our eCAS telemanagement products decreased slightly
from prior year levels, down 4% for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 1% for the six months
ended June 30, 2005 from the respective three and six months period of 2004. The decrease in
sales was attributable to a 20% decrease in direct sales to Avaya Inc. for the second quarter and
18% for the first half of this year as compared with the prior year due to organization changes
within Avaya. We have been successful however, in increasing our sales to Avaya master distributor
channels as well as through other non-Avaya channels, nearly offsetting the reduction in sales to
Avaya on a direct basis. Sales of telemanagement products and services accounted for 60% of second
quarter revenues and 62% of total revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared with
65% and 63% of total revenues for the same three and six months ended June 30, 2004.
Revenues from our Outsourced Solutions Group decreased 18% for the first six months of 2005 as
compared with the first six months of 2004 due to the loss of a major customer through a merger
/consolidation. Several new quotes for hosted solutions are currently outstanding and we are
hopeful of adding at least one new client during the third quarter.
Cost of Sales
For the quarter ended June 30, 2005 we earned a gross margin (defined as sales minus cost of
sales) of $2,221,000, or 83% of sales. This compared with a gross margin of $2,092,000, or 81% of
sales, for the three months ended June 30, 2004. The higher margin for the quarter reflects a
decrease of $51,000 in direct product costs for the current quarter as compared to the prior year.
For the six months ended June 30, 2005 our gross margin of $4,408,000, or 83% of sales, compares
with a gross margin of $4,385,000, or 84% of sales for the six months ended June 30, 2004. The
slightly lower margin, as a percentage of sales, is the result of an increase in the amortization
costs related to past software development efforts.
Operating Expenses
Engineering and software development expenses, net of capitalization, of $179,000 and $481,000
for the three and six months ended June 30 2005 decreased 69% and 41% respectively, from net
engineering and software development expenses of $574,000 and $812,000 for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2004. The decrease in gross engineering and software development expenses, before
the effects of capitalization, was also significant, representing 21% and 19% for the three and six
month periods ended June 30, 2005 as compared with the same periods of 2004. The table below
summarizes gross expenditures for engineering and software development expenses, amounts
capitalized, and amortized, and the overall impact of our engineering and development efforts on
the Companys statements of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004:
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30 |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Gross expenses for engineering
and software development |
|
$ |
555,160 |
|
|
$ |
704,238 |
|
|
$ |
1,137,406 |
|
|
$ |
1,400,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Software development
costs capitalized |
|
|
(376,165 |
) |
|
|
(130,585 |
) |
|
|
(656,619 |
) |
|
|
(589,061 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net expenses for engineering
and software development
included in the Companys
statements of operations |
|
|
178,995 |
|
|
|
573,653 |
|
|
|
480,787 |
|
|
|
811,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plus: Software development
costs amortized and charged
to cost of sales |
|
|
201,263 |
|
|
|
144,464 |
|
|
|
402,526 |
|
|
|
247,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Expense Recognized |
|
$ |
380,258 |
|
|
$ |
718,117 |
|
|
$ |
883,313 |
|
|
$ |
1,059,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in engineering and software development expense levels results from a lower
staffing requirement brought about by a reduced level of ongoing engineering support and test
required of the eCAS and VeraSMART product lines, due to the inherent quality of the products. As a
result, salary and benefit expenses have been reduced from the prior year.
Selling, general, and administrative expenses of $1,798,000 for the three months ended June
30, 2005 decreased 12% from expenses of $2,033,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2004. For
the six months ended June 30, 2005 selling, general and administrative expenses of $3,769,000
decreased 7% from $4,072,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004. While we continue to
strengthen our sales teams by adding personnel in strategic locations throughout the country, we
have, at the same time, been able to significantly reduce our customer support and service expenses
as a result of the quality and ease of use of our eCAS and VeraSMART products referred to above,
the result of which has been a significantly reduced level of service calls from our customers.
15
Liquidity and Capital Resources
For the quarter ended June 30, 2005 the Companys net cash position, consisting of cash in the
bank and the value of short term investments, increased by $103,000 from $978,000 at March 31,
2005 to $1,081,000. While our overall cash position has remained stable over the last five
quarters we are hopeful of further increases in liquidity over the second half of the year as we
anticipate an increase in sales of VeraSMART coupled with a lower expense base than we had in place
a year ago.
Accounts receivable of $1,383,000 at June 30, 2005 have increased from $1,276,000 at December
31, 2004 and $ 1,353,000 at March 31, 2005. We continue to encounter virtually no collection
problems with major customers. The reserve for bad debts at March 31, 2005 is $25,000, virtually
unchanged from a reserve of $24,000 at December 31, 2004.
Prepaid expenses of $136,000 at June 30, 2005 have increased by $26,000 from $110,000 at
December 31, 2004, reflecting the first quarter 2005 renewal of a series of business insurance
policies. The value of prepaid expenses is expected to decrease over the second half of the year
as economic value of these policies are utilized.
For the first six months of 2005 we invested $49,000 in the purchase of new capital equipment.
The majority of these purchases have been to upgrade our internal network infrastructure. It is
not currently expected that we will be increasing our capital spending significantly during the
second half of 2005.
The value of capitalized software emanating from the companys software development efforts
and included in other assets on our Balance Sheet at June 30, 2005 is $2,773,000, up from
$2,518,000 at December 31, 2004. For the six months ended June 30, 2005 we have capitalized
$657,000 of development costs, all related to VeraSMART versions 3.0 and 4.0, and amortized
$402,000 development costs previously capitalized. The Companys normal policy is to amortize
product development costs over 5 years.
Pension and related asset increased from $2,778,000 at December 31, 2004 to $2,850,000 at June
30, 2005 with the increase reflecting a growth in the cash surrender values of Company-owned life
insurance policies. The death benefit and accumulated cash values of these policies are intended
to cover future pension obligations of the Company. The cash surrender values attached to these
policies is also available to fund current operations in the event that should become necessary.
Management has no plans at this time nor anticipates the need in the near future to access these
funds to meet current operating requirements.
Current liabilities of $3,535,000 at June 30, 2005 decreased 2% from $3,616,000 at December
31, 2004 despite an increase of just over $100,000 in deferred revenues. Deferred revenues
represent services such as training, installation, and maintenance and support services for which
the Company has billed customers, but for which it has not yet performed the actual services. All
such services currently deferred are expected to be provided over the next twelve months and
recorded as sales revenue at the time the actual service is provided or rendered.
The increase in deferred revenues offset decreases in accounts payable of $63,000 and accrued
compensation and related taxes of $109,000 from the December 31, 2004 balances.
Stockholders equity of $1,573,000 at June 30, 2005 increased from $1,453,000 at December 31,
2004. The increase in stockholders equity includes the net income earned of $164,000 for the first
six months of 2005
16
plus proceeds received by the Company of $47,000 from the exercise of stock
option by employees. These gains
were partially offset by a reduction in equity resulting from the cancellation of
approximately 235,000 unexercised stock option grants to employees no longer with the Company.
It is managements belief that given its current liquidity position, the access to cash
surrender values of company-owned life insurance policies, current operating expense levels, and
the absence of debt, that the Company has sufficient liquidity to fund operation and development
schedules for the next twelve months and beyond.
17
Accounting Pronouncements
1) |
|
In December 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting
Bulletin (SAB) No. 104, Revenue Recognition, which updates the guidance in SAB No. 101,
integrates the related set of Frequently Asked Questions, and recognizes the role of EITF
00-21. The adoption of SAB No. 104 did not have a material effect on the Companys
consolidated financial statements. |
|
2) |
|
In November 2002, the Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus on Issue No. 00-21,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. Issue 00-21 provides guidance on how to
account for arrangements that involve the delivery or performance of multiple products,
services and/or rights to use assets. The provisions of Issue 00-21 applied to revenue
arrangements entered into in periods beginning after June 15, 2003. The adoption of Issue
00-21 did not have a material effect on the Companys financial position or results of
operations. |
|
3) |
|
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 123(R), which replaces SFAS 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees. SFAS 123(R) requires compensation costs relating to share-based payment
transactions be recognized in financial statements. The pro forma disclosure previously
permitted under SFAS 123 will no longer be an acceptable alternative to recognition of
expenses in the financial statements. SFAS 123(R) is effective as of the beginning of the
first reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005, with early adoption encouraged. We
currently measure compensation costs related to share-based payments under APB 25, as allowed
by SFAS 123, and provide disclosure in notes to financial statements as required by SFAS 123.
We are required to adopt SFAS 123(R) starting from the first fiscal quarter of 2006. The
adoption of SFAS 123(R) could have an adverse impact on our net income and net income per
share. We are currently in the process of evaluating the extent of such impact. |
|
4) |
|
In December 2004, FASB issued SFAS 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assetsan amendment to
APB Opinion No. 29. This statement amends APB 29 to eliminate the exception for nonmonetary
exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges
of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A nonmonetary exchange has
commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change
significantly as a result of the exchange. Adoption of this statement is not expected to have
a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition. |
|
5) |
|
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections a
replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3 (SFAS 154). SFAS 154 changes
the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle.
These requirements apply to all voluntary changes and changes required by an accounting
pronouncement in the unusual instance that the pronouncement does not include specific
transition provisions. SFAS 154 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2005. As such, the Company is required to adopt these provisions at the beginning of the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS
154 on its financial statements. |
18
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect amounts reported therein. The most significant of these involving difficult or complex
judgments in 2005 include:
|
|
|
Revenue recognition |
|
|
|
|
Capitalization of software development costs |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
|
|
|
|
Pension liability |
In each situation, management is required to make estimates about the effects of matters or
future events that are inherently uncertain.
Revenue Recognition
The Companys revenue consists of revenues from the licensing of software to resellers and end
user customers; fees for services rendered to include installation, training, implementation, and
customer maintenance contracts; and the outsourcing or hosting of services.
The Company recognizes software license revenue under Statement of Position No 97-2 Software
Revenue Recognition as amended by Statement of Position No. 98-9, Software Revenue Recognition
With Respect to Certain Transactions, Emerging Issues Task Force 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with
Multiple Deliverables, and related interpretations
Sales of licensed software sold directly to an end user customer are recognized as revenue
upon delivery and installation of the software at the customer site. Sales of licensed software to
a reseller are recognized as revenue when delivery is made to the reseller. Regardless of the form
of sale no revenue is recognized without persuasive evidence of an arrangement existing. Persuasive
evidence is determined to be a signed purchase order received from the customer or an equivalent
form for those customers lacking a formalized purchase order system. In the case of VeraSMART
sales, a software license agreement signed by both parties is required in addition to a purchase
order or equivalent. Additionally revenue is only recognized when a selling price is fixed or
determinable and collectibility of the receivable is deemed to be probable.
Service revenues such as training, installation and implementation are recognized when the
service is complete and acknowledged by the customer, regardless at to whether the sale is on a
direct basis or through a reseller arrangement.
Fees charged to customers for Post-contract Customer Support are recognized ratably over the
term of the contract. Costs related to maintenance obligation are expensed as incurred.
The Company revenues generated through hosting solutions are recognized using the proportional
performance method. Revenues are recognized in the month services are rendered and earned under
service agreements with clients where service fees are fixed or determinable. Contracts can be
terminated with 90 days written notice. All services provided by us through the date of
cancellation are due and payable under the contract terms.
19
The Company believes its revenue recognition policies are appropriate, in all circumstances,
and that its policies are reflective of complexities arising from customer arrangements involving
such features as maintenance, warranty agreements, license agreements, and other normal course of
business arrangements.
Capitalization of Software Development Costs
The Company capitalizes software development costs when technological feasibility has been
established for the software in accordance with SFAS No. 86, Accounting for the Costs of Computer
Software to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed. Such capitalized costs are amortized on a
product-by-product basis over their economic life or the ratio of current revenues to current and
anticipated revenues from such software, whichever provides the greater amortization. The Company
periodically reviews the carrying value of capitalized software development costs and impairments
are recognized in the results of operations when the expected future undiscounted operating cash
flow derived from the capitalized software is less than its carrying value. Should the Company
inaccurately determine when a product reaches technological feasibility or the economic life of a
product, results could differ materially from those reported. Veramark uses what it believes are
reasonable assumptions and where applicable, established valuation techniques in making its
estimates.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the
potential inability of its customers to make required payments. Management specifically analyzes
accounts receivable, historical bad debts, credit concentrations and customer payment terms when
evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts.
Pension Liability
The Company sponsors an unfunded Supplemental Executive Retirement Program (SERP), which is
a nonqualified plan that provides certain key employees a defined pension benefit. In order to
properly record the net present value of future pension obligations a number of assumptions are
required to be made by Companys management. These assumptions include years of service, life
expectancies, and projected future salary increases for each participant. In addition, management
must make assumptions with regard to the proper long-term interest and liability discount rates to
be applied to these future obligations.
Should the Company need to alter any of these assumptions, there is the potential for
significant adjustments to future projected pension liabilities.
20
Issues and Risks
The following factors, among others discussed herein and in the Companys filings under the
Act, could cause actual results and future events to differ materially from those set forth or
contemplated in the forward-looking statements: economic, competitive, governmental and
technological factors, increased operating costs, failure to obtain necessary outside financing,
risks related to natural disasters and financial market fluctuations. Such factors also include:
Intellectual Property Rights
Veramark regards its software as proprietary and attempts to protect it with a combination of
copyright, trademark and trade secret protections, employee and third-party non-disclosure
agreements and other methods of protection. Despite those precautions, it may be possible for
unauthorized third parties to copy certain portions of Veramarks products, reverse engineer
or obtain and use information that Veramark regards as proprietary. In addition, Veramark
sometimes use click-wrap licenses, under which it licenses its products, which may be
unenforceable under the laws of certain jurisdictions. Also, the laws of some foreign
countries do not protect Veramarks proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the
United States. Any misappropriation of Veramarks intellectual property could have a material
adverse effect on its business and results of operations. Furthermore, although Veramark
takes steps to prevent unlawful infringement of others intellectual property, there can be
no assurance that third parties will not assert infringement claims against Veramark in the
future with respect to current or future products. Any such assertion could require Veramark
to enter into royalty arrangements or result in costly litigation.
New Products and Services
Veramark has made significant investments in research, development and marketing for new
products, services and technologies, including the VeraSMART software offering and its
service bureau outsourced solutions. Significant revenue from new product and service
investments may not be achieved for a number of years, if at all. Moreover, for such
products or services, operating margins may not be as high as the margins historically
experienced by Veramark.
Declines in Demand for Software
If overall market demand for software and computer devices generally, as well as call
accounting software or enterprise level products specifically, declines, or corporate
spending for such products declines, Veramarks revenue will be adversely affected.
Additionally, Veramarks revenues would be unfavorably impacted if customers were to reduce
their purchases of new software products or upgrades to existing products.
Product Development Schedule
The development of software products is a complex and time-consuming process. New products
and enhancements to existing products can require long development and testing periods.
Significant delays in new product releases or significant problems in creating new products,
particularly any delays in future releases of the VeraSMART suite of products, could
adversely affect Veramark revenues.
Competition
Veramark experiences intensive competition across all markets for its products and services.
Some competing firms have greater name recognition and more financial, marketing and
technological resources than Veramark. These competitive pressures may result in decreased
sales volumes, price
21
reductions,
and/or increased operating costs, such as for marketing and sales incentives, resulting in
lower revenues, gross margins and operating income.
Marketing and Sales
Veramarks marketing and distribution strategy is founded on building mutually beneficial
relationships with companies that have established distribution networks. Some sell
privately labeled, customized products developed and manufactured by Veramark to their
specific specifications, while others resell Veramarks products. Any loss of the continued
availability of those relationships could have a material adverse effect on Veramarks
business and results of operations.
22
Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company has no long-term bank debt obligations. The Company has no foreign currency
exchange risk and has no foreign currency exchange contracts.
Item 4 Controls and Procedures
Based upon an evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Companys
Chief Executive Officer and the Companys Treasurer (Chief Accounting Officer) concluded that the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that
information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the
time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the
Companys management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or
persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. There have been no changes in the Companys internal controls over financial reporting,
that occurred during the period covered by this report, that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect the Companys internal controls over financial reporting.
The Companys disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial
reporting provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that all deficiencies in design or
operation of those control systems, or all instances of errors or fraud, will be prevented or
detected. Those control systems are designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving the goals
of those systems in light of the Companys resources and nature of the Companys business
operations. The Companys disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial
reporting remain subject to risks of human error and the risk that controls can be circumvented for
wrongful purposes by one or more individuals in management or non-management positions.
23
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 5: Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer
The Companys Chief Executive Officer and the Companys Chief Accounting Officer have
provided the certifications with respect to this Form 10-Q that are required by Sections
302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. These certifications have been filed as
Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 and Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2, respectively.
Item 6: Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
|
(a) |
|
Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K |
|
|
|
|
(I) Registrants Condensed Financial Statements for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2005 and 2004 are set forth in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q. |
|
|
|
|
(II) Calculation of income (loss) per share for the three and six months ended June
30, 2005 and 2004, as set forth as Exhibit II. |
|
|
|
|
(31.1) CEO Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), As Adopted
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
(31.2) Treasurer Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), As Adopted
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
(31.1) CEO Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
(31.2) Treasurer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
(b) |
|
Reports filed on 8-K during quarter for which report is filed |
|
(1) |
|
On May 13, 2005, the Company filed a current report on Form 8-K
reporting that the Company issued a press release announcing the companys
financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2005. A copy of such press
release, was attached as Exhibit 99.1. |
24
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
VERAMARK TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
REGISTRANT
Date: August 12, 2005
|
|
|
/s/ David G. Mazzella |
|
|
|
|
|
President and CEO |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 12, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Ronald C. Lundy |
|
|
|
|
|
Treasurer (Chief Accounting Officer) |
|
|
25