Edgar Filing: NEOGENOMICS INC

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012.

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 000-54384

NEOGENOMICS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Nevada		74-2897368
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

12701 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 9, Fort Myers, Florida		33913
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(239) 768-0600

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of August 2, 2012, the registrant had 45,162,863 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited)			4
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			14
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			25
Item 4. Controls and Procedures			25
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings			26
Item 1A. Risk Factors			26
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			26
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities			26
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures			26
Item 5. Other Information			26
Item 6. Exhibits			27
SIGNATURES

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The information in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” and information within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) relating to NeoGenomics, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Parent” or the “Parent Company”), and its subsidiary, NeoGenomics Laboratories, Inc., a Florida corporation (“NEO”, “NeoGenomics Laboratories” or the “Subsidiary”) (collectively referred to as “we”, “us”, “our”, “NeoGenomics”, or the “Company”), which are subject to the “safe harbor” from liabilities created by those sections under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning our strategy, future operations, future financial position, future revenues, projected costs, prospects and plans and objectives of management. The words “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “projects,” “will,” “would” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. Forward-looking statements can generally be identified as such because the context of the statement typically addresses future events or conditions. We may not actually achieve the projections, goals, plans, intentions or expectations disclosed in our forward-looking statements and you should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, the risks set forth in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2012.

Forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q include, but are not limited to, statements about:

•

Our ability to implement our business strategy;

•

The expected reimbursement levels from governmental payers and private insurers;

•

The application, to our business and the services we provide, of existing laws, rules and regulations, including without limitation, Medicare laws, anti-kickback laws, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) regulations, state medical privacy laws, federal and state false claims laws and corporate practice of medicine laws;

•

Regulatory developments in the United States;

•

Our ability to maintain our license under Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (“CLIA”);

•

Our ability to expand our operations and increase our market share;

•

Our ability to expand our service offerings by adding new testing capabilities;

•

Our ability to meet our future capital requirements;

•

Our ability to compete with other diagnostic laboratories;

•

Our ability to hire and retain sufficient managerial, sales, clinical and other personnel to meet our needs;

•

Our ability to successfully scale our business, including expanding our facilities, our backup systems and infrastructure; and

•

The accuracy of our projections and estimates regarding reimbursements, expenses, future revenues and capital requirements.

Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement or statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. New factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all of such factors, nor can it assess the impact of each such factor on the business of the Company or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

NEOGENOMICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share data)

(unaudited)


	June 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,566		$	2,628
Restricted cash		300			500
Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,466 and $2,150, respectively)		11,327			7,894
Inventories		1,526			1,202
Other current assets		837			954

Total current assets		16,556			13,178
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT (net of accumulated depreciation of $8,258 and $6,653 respectively)		8,410			6,642
INTANGIBLE ASSETS (net of accumulated amortization of $70 and $- , respectively)		2,912			—
OTHER ASSETS		123			129

TOTAL ASSETS	$	28,001		$	19,949

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable	$	3,134		$	2,529
Accrued compensation		2,314			2,137
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		691			773
Short-term portion of equipment capital leases		2,564			2,107
Revolving credit line		6,393			3,898

Total current liabilities		15,096			11,444
LONG TERM LIABILITIES
Long-term portion of equipment capital leases		3,186			2,608

TOTAL LIABILITIES		18,282			14,052

Commitments and contingencies
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock, $.001 par value, (100,000,000 shares authorized; 45,143,363 and 43,416,200 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively)		45			43
Additional paid-in capital		31,157			28,490
Accumulated deficit		(21,483	)		(22,636	)

Total stockholders’ equity		9,719			5,897

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	28,001		$	19,949

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

NEOGENOMICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

(unaudited)


	For the three months ended June 30,						For the six months ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
NET REVENUE	$	15,611		$	10,466		$	30,771		$	19,271
COST OF REVENUE		8,244			5,810			16,261			10,750

GROSS PROFIT		7,367			4,656			14,510			8,521

OPERATING EXPENSES
General and administrative		4,066			2,914			7,816			5,618
Research and development		528			172			1,025			291
Sales and marketing		1,934			1,684			3,969			3,437

Total operating expenses		6,528			4,770			12,810			9,346
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS		839			(114	)		1,700			(825	)

INTEREST AND OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) – NET		(288	)		(179	)		(546	)		(361	)

NET INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE TAXES		551			(293	)		1,154			(1,186	)
INCOME TAXES		—			—			—			—

NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	551		$	(293	)	$	1,154		$	(1,186	)

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
– Basic	$	0.01		$	(0.01	)	$	0.03		$	(0.03	)

– Diluted	$	0.01		$	(0.01	)	$	0.02		$	(0.03	)

WEIGHTED AVG NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING
– Basic		44,954			42,857			44,827			42,299

– Diluted		47,650			42,857			47,501			42,299

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

NEOGENOMICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

(unaudited)


	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012			2011
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income (loss)	$	1,154		$	(1,186	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Provision for bad debts		1,735			1,109
Amortization of intangibles		70			—
Depreciation of property and equipment		1,605			963
Amortization of debt issue costs		19			21
Stock-based compensation – options		258			179
Stock-based compensation – warrants and restricted stock		84			70
Changes in assets and liabilities, net:
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable, net of write-offs		(5,168	)		(3,028	)
(Increase) decrease in inventories		(324	)		(192	)
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses		98			340
(Increase) decrease in other current assets		6			(2	)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and other liabilities		479			672

NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES		16			(1,054	)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of intangible assets		(1,013	)		—
Purchases of property and equipment		(1,037	)		(125	)

NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES		(2,050	)		(125	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Restricted cash		200			—
Advances (payments) on credit facility, net		2,495			377
Repayment of capital leases		(1,104	)		(753	)
Issuance of common stock and warrants for cash, net of transaction expenses		381			3,090

NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		1,972			2,714

NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		(62	)		1,535
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD		2,628			1,097

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD	$	2,566		$	2,632

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Interest paid	$	529		$	344

Income taxes paid	$	—		$	—

NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Equipment leased under capital leases	$	2,140		$	523

Non-cash intangible asset purchase	$	1,945		$	—

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

NEOGENOMICS, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JUNE 30, 2012

NOTE A — NATURE OF BUSINESS AND BASIS OF FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRESENTATION

Nature of Business

NeoGenomics, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Parent” or the “Parent Company”), and its subsidiary, NeoGenomics Laboratories, Inc., a Florida corporation (“NeoGenomics Laboratories” or the “Subsidiary”) (collectively referred to as “we”, “us”, “our”, “NeoGenomics”, or the “Company”), operates as a certified “high complexity” clinical laboratory in accordance with the federal government’s Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act, as amended (“CLIA”), and is dedicated to the delivery of clinical diagnostic services to pathologists, oncologists, urologists, hospitals, and other laboratories throughout the United States.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information. These financial statements include the accounts of the Parent and the Subsidiary. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in the accompanying financial statements.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the Company’s annual audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes have been condensed or omitted in these interim financial statements. Accordingly, the unaudited consolidated financial statements included herein should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2012.

The results of operations presented in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for any future periods. In the opinion of management, these unaudited consolidated financial statements include all adjustments and accruals, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments that are necessary for a fair statement of the results of all interim periods reported herein.

Certain amounts in the prior year’s consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

NOTE B — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Use of Estimates

The Company prepares its consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These principles require management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, together with amounts disclosed in the related notes to the consolidated financial statements. Actual results and outcomes may differ from management’s estimates, judgments and assumptions. Significant estimates, judgments and assumptions used in these consolidated financial statements include, but are not limited to, those related to revenues, accounts receivable and related reserves, contingencies, useful lives and recovery of long-term and intangible assets, income taxes, and the fair value of stock-based compensation. These estimates, judgments, and assumptions are reviewed periodically and the effects of material revisions in estimates are reflected in the consolidated financial statements prospectively from the date of the change in estimate.

Research and Development

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and development expenses consist of compensation and benefits for research and development personnel, amortization of intangibles, related supplies, inventory and payment for samples to complete validation studies. These expenses were incurred to develop new genetic tests.

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets with finite useful lives are recorded at fair value which is our cost, less accumulated amortization. Amortization is recognized over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The Company’s intangible assets are related to our license agreement with Health Discovery Corporation.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Concentrations of credit risk with respect to revenue and accounts receivable are primarily limited to certain clients to whom the Company provides a significant volume of its services, and to specific payers of our services such as Medicare and individual insurance companies. The Company’s client base consists of a large number of geographically dispersed clients diversified across various customer types. Over the last year, we have expanded our relationship with a large oncology practice with multiple office locations, each of which is a separate client to NeoGenomics. For the three months ended June 30, 2012, all of the affiliated client office locations from this oncology practice combined represented approximately 15.3% of our revenue compared to 9.9% of revenue for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 and for the six months ended June 30, 2012 represented approximately 16.6% of our revenue compared to 6.0% of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2011. All other clients were less than 5% of total revenue individually.

Income Taxes

We compute income taxes in accordance with applicable accounting standards. Deferred taxes are recognized for the tax consequences of temporary differences by applying enacted statutory rates applicable to future years to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. Also, the effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that included the enactment date. Temporary differences between financial and tax reporting arise primarily from the use of different depreciation methods for property and equipment, stock based compensation expense and the timing of recognition of bad debts.

We evaluate tax positions that have been taken or are expected to be taken in our tax returns, and record a liability for uncertain tax positions. As of June 30, 2012 we had no provision for related income taxes because we have large Net Operating Loss positions to offset our current net income.

NOTE C — REVOLVING CREDIT AND SECURITY AGREEMENT

On March 26, 2012, the Parent Company, NeoGenomics Laboratories (“Borrower”), and CapitalSource Finance LLC (“Capital Source”) entered into a First Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Security Agreement, dated April 26, 2010 (the “Amended and Restated Credit Agreement” or the “Credit Facility”). The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement amended and restated the original Revolving Credit and Security Agreement dated February 1, 2008, as amended, among the Parent Company, Borrower and CapitalSource (the “Original Credit Agreement”). The terms of the Amendment and the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement are substantially similar except that the Amendment, among other things:

I.)

Increases the maximum principal amount of the revolving credit facility (the “Facility Cap”) to $8.0 million from $5.0 million; provided, that the Borrower may request to increase the Facility Cap twice during the term of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement in increments of $1.0 million to a maximum of $10,000,000;

II.)	Extends the term of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement to March 26, 2015;

III.)

Revises the definition of “Minimum Termination Fee” to be:

2.5% of the Facility Cap if the “Revolver Termination” (as defined in the Agreement) is at any time before March 26, 2013;

1.5% of the Facility Cap if the Revolver Termination is after March 26, 2013 but before March 26, 2014;

0.5% of the Facility Cap if the Revolver Termination is on or after March 26, 2014; and

That there shall be no Minimum Termination Fee if the Revolver Termination occurs within five (5) days of the end of the term.

IV.)	Modifies the definition of “Permitted Indebtedness” and “Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio”; and

V.)	Amends Section 3.1 of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by deleting “the LIBOR shall be not less than 2.0%” and replacing it with “the LIBOR shall be not less than 1.0%”.

We paid Capital Source a commitment fee of $80,000 in connection with the Amendment.

Interest on outstanding advances under the Credit Facility are payable monthly in arrears on the first day of each calendar month and has an effective rate of interest of 5.25%.

On June 30, 2012 the available credit under the Credit Facility was approximately $1.6 million and the outstanding borrowing was $6.4 million after netting compensating cash on hand.

On July 27, 2012 the Facility Cap was increased from $8.0 million to $9.0 million.

NOTE D — INTANGIBLE ASSETS

On January 6, 2012, we entered into a Master License Agreement (the “License Agreement”) with Health Discovery Corporation, a Georgia corporation (“HDC”). We were granted an exclusive worldwide license to certain of HDC’s “Licensed Patents” and “Licensed Know-How” (as defined in the License Agreement) to, among other things, use, develop, make, have made, sell, offer to sell, modify, and commercially exploit “Licensed Uses” (as defined in the License Agreement) and “Licensed Products” (as defined in the License Agreement), in the fields of laboratory testing, molecular diagnostics, clinical pathology, anatomic pathology and digital image analysis (excluding non-pathology-related radiologic and photographic image analysis) relating to the development, marketing production or sale of any “Laboratory Developed Tests” or LDTs (as defined in the License Agreement) or other products used for diagnosing, ruling out, predicting a response to treatment, and/or monitoring treatment of any or all hematopoietic and solid tumor cancers excluding cancers affecting the retina and breast cancer (collectively with certain other qualifications as defined in the License Agreement, the “Field” or “Field of Use”).

The License Agreement allows us, among other things, to develop and sell, without limitation, any gene, gene-product or protein-based LDTs using HDC’s technology in the Field and provides for sublicensing rights and the assignment of the License Agreement, in whole or in part, in our sole discretion. The License Agreement further provides us with access to certain HDC personnel and consulting resources in the fields of mathematics and in genetic and molecular test development. The Licensed Know-How also includes, among other things, certain tests, algorithms and computer software which have already been developed by HDC.

We have agreed to use our best efforts to commercialize certain products within one year of the date of the License Agreement, subject to two one-year extensions per product if needed, including LDTs for prostate, colon and pancreatic cancer and software to automate the interpretation of cytogenetics and flow cytometry (collectively, the “Initial Licensed Products”).

If we have not generated $5.0 million of net revenue from products, services and sublicensing arrangements pursuant to the License Agreement within five years of the effective date, HDC may, at its option, revoke the exclusivity with respect to any one or more of the Initial Licensed Products, subject to certain conditions.

We had no intangible assets on December 31, 2011 and at June 30, 2012 intangible assets consisted of the following (in thousands):


	Weighted Average Amortization Period		June 30, 2012
			COST		Accumulated Amortization		Net
Support Vector Machine (SVM) technology		108 months	$	500	$	28	$	472

Laboratory developed test (LDT) technology		164 months	$	1,482	$	27	$	1,455

Flow Cytometry and Cytogenetics technology		202 months	$	1,000	$	15	$	985

We recorded approximately $56,000 and $70,000 in amortization expense of intangibles for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 as a research and development expense in the consolidated statement of operations. We will record all amortization of intangibles in that category until the time that we have products, services or cost savings directly attributable to these intangible assets that would require that it be recorded in cost of goods sold.

The estimated amortization expense related to amortizable intangible assets for each of the five succeeding fiscal years and thereafter as of June 30, 2012 is as follows (in thousands):


Fiscal Year Ending December 31,
Remainder of 2012	$	112
2013		223
2014		223
2015		223
2016		223
2017		223
Thereafter		1,685

NOTE E — NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

Basic net income (loss) per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the applicable period. Diluted net income per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the applicable period, plus the dilutive effect of potential common stock. Potential common stock consists of shares issuable pursuant to stock options and warrants. Diluted net (loss) per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the applicable period. Potential common stock is excluded from diluted net (loss) per share as such amounts are anti-dilutive. Calculations of net income (loss) per share are done using the treasury stock method.

The following table provides the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share for the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2012 and 2011: (in thousands, except per share amounts)


	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011			2012		2011
Net income (loss)	$	551	$	(293	)	$	1,154	$	(1,186	)

Basic weighted average shares outstanding		44,954		42,857			44,827		42,299
Effect of potentially dilutive securities		2,696		—			2,674		—

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding		47,650		42,857			47,501		42,299

Basic net income (loss) per share	$	0.01	$	(0.01	)	$	0.03	$	(0.03	)

Diluted net income (loss) per share	$	0.01	$	(0.01	)	$	0.02	$	(0.03	)

Outstanding stock options to acquire an aggregate 884,499 and 904,499 shares of common stock for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 were excluded in the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise prices of these stock options were greater than the average market price of the Company’s common stock during the respective periods. As a result, the effect of including these options would be anti-dilutive.

NOTE F — STOCK OPTIONS

On January 9, 2012, Dr. Maher Albitar, our Chief Medical Officer was granted a stock option to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price per share of $1.43, which was the closing price per share on the last trading day prior to his start date. The stock option has a five year term and becomes 25% vested on each of the first four anniversaries of his start date. The stock option also fully vests upon a change of control of the Company. This stock option will be treated as a non-employee consultant option agreement and as such we revalued the stock option at June 30, 2012. The stock option was valued at $173,411 and we recorded $18,864 and $39,378 of stock compensation expense related to the stock options in the three and six months ended June 30, 2012.

On February 14, 2012, Mr. VanOort, our Chief Executive Officer was granted a supplemental non-qualified stock option to purchase 800,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.71 per share which has a five year term so long as Mr. VanOort remains an employee of the Company (the “Supplemental Options”). The Supplemental Options are scheduled to vest according to the passage of time with 200,000 shares vesting each year on the anniversary of the grant date for the first four years after the grant. The Supplemental Options are valued at $505,000 based on a trinomial lattice model and we recorded $30,113 and $89,684 of stock compensation expense related to the Supplemental Options in the three and six months ended June 30, 2012.

In the event of a change of control of the Company in which the consideration payable to common stockholders of the Company has a deemed value of at least $4.00 per share, any unvested portion of the Supplemental Options will immediately vest in full.

As of June 30, 2012, stock options to purchase 5,942,003 shares of our common stock were outstanding. The exercise prices of these options range from $0.25 to $1.71 per share.

NOTE G — COMMON STOCK WARRANTS

Albitar Warrant

On January 9, 2012 Dr. Maher Albitar was granted a warrant to purchase 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Albitar Warrant”) at an exercise price per share of $1.43, which was the closing price per share on the last trading day prior to his start date. This warrant will be treated as a non-employee consultant warrant agreement and as such we revalued the warrant at June 30, 2012. The Albitar Warrant has a five year term and vests in accordance with the performance criteria as follows:

(i)

80,000 will vest upon the commercial launch of the Company’s gene-based plasma prostate cancer test licensed from Health Discovery Corp (“HDC”) or similar test based on our mutual agreement.

(ii)

40,000 will vest upon the commercial launch of the Company’s gene-based colon cancer test licensed from HDC or similar test based on our mutual agreement.

(iii)

40,000 will vest upon the commercial launch of the Company’s gene-based pancreatic cancer test licensed from HDC or similar test based on our mutual agreement.

(iv)

20,000 will vest upon successful consummation of a sublicensing agreement with an instrument manufacturer to commercialize the cytogenetics automated image analysis technology licenses from HDC

(v)

20,000 will vest upon successful consummation of a sublicensing agreement with an instrument manufacturer to commercialize the flow cytometry automated image analysis technology licenses from HDC

On June 30, 2012 this Albitar Warrant was valued at $130,678 and we recorded approximately $15,000 and $32,500 of stock compensation expense related to the Albitar Warrant for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012.

Warrant exercises

In March 2012, a former member of our board of directors exercised 100,000 warrants in a cashless net exercise which resulted in him receiving 10,571 shares of our common stock

In June 2012, 550,000 warrants previously issued in June 2007 to then members of our board of directors and 348,417 warrants issued in June 2007 as part of a common stock offering were exercised or expired as follows:


Type of Exercise	Warrant Shares		Exercise Price / Share		Cash Received		Common Stock Shares Issued
For cash		175,000	$	1.50	$	262,500		175,000
Cashless net exercise		575,000	$	1.50	$	—		64,495
Expired unexercised		98,417	$	1.50	$	—		—

Warrant activity for the six months ended June 30, 2012 is summarized as follows:


	Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price
Warrants outstanding, December 31, 2011		2,156,750		$	1.34
Granted		200,000			1.43
Exercised		(900,000	)		1.50
Expired		(98,417	)		1.50
Cancelled		—			—

Warrants outstanding, June 30, 2012		1,358,333			1.24

NOTE H — CAPITAL LEASES

Garic Lease

On September 9, 2011, we entered into a master lease agreement for an equipment lease line of credit with Garic, Inc. The facility has a 12 month draw down period and each schedule has a thirty six month term. The lease has a fair market value option at the end of the term at a price not to exceed fifteen percent of the equipment cost or the right to return the equipment. As of June 30, 2012 the specifics of the facility were as follows:


Description	Facility Amount		FY 2012 Leased Amounts		Outstanding Amount		Available Amount		Interest Rate			Term
Lease Facility	$	1,000,0000		358,000		558,000		442,000		16.12	%		36 months

Wells Fargo

In June 2012, we entered into a five year, $1 buyout equipment lease of approximately $495,000 for the purchase of laboratory equipment with Wells Fargo Lease Equipment Financing. The lease has an interest rate of approximately 6%.

Other Vendor Leasing

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we entered into several vendor lease arrangements for approximately $1,120,000, primarily for the acquisition of lab equipment and to a lesser extent computer hardware. These capital leases are for 36 to 60 month terms, have either $1 purchase options or were fair market value at the end of the term, and approximate interest rates between 8% and 16%.

NOTE I — OTHER RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, Steven C. Jones, a director of the Company, earned approximately $52,500 and $50,000, respectively, for various consulting work performed in connection with his duties as Executive Vice President of Finance. During the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, he earned approximately $102,500 and $101,000, respectively, for various consulting work performed in connection with his duties as Executive Vice President of Finance. Mr. Jones also received $55,000 and $6,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 as payment of his annual bonus compensation for the previous fiscal year.

NOTE J — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On July 17, 2012 the Internal Revenue Service completed its audit of our fiscal year 2009 and 2010 tax returns. The audit resulted in a small proposed adjustment to our Net Operating Loss carry forward which resulted from the Therapeutic Discovery Grant being considered as a reduction of expenses for tax purposes. As a result of the audit our net operating loss tax carry forward of federal and state income taxes changed to $16,249,164 at December 31, 2011 from $16,683,683 as previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2012. Since we did not meet the standard established by ASC Topic 740 at December 31, 2011 we had a valuation allowance to fully reserve our deferred tax asset and that reserve will also change to $16,249,164 as well.

END OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

NeoGenomics, Inc., a Nevada corporation (referred to individually as the “Parent Company” or collectively with all of its subsidiaries as “NeoGenomics” or the “Company” in this Form 10-Q) is the registrant for SEC reporting purposes. Our common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board and the OTCQB under the symbol “NGNM.”

Introduction

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements, and the notes thereto included herein. The information contained below includes statements of the Company’s or management’s beliefs, expectations, hopes, goals and plans that, if not historical facts, are forward-looking statements subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements. For a discussion on forward-looking statements, see the information set forth in the introductory note to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q under the caption “Forward Looking Statements”, which information is incorporated herein by reference.

Overview

We operate a network of cancer-focused testing laboratories whose mission is to improve patient care through exceptional genetic and molecular testing services. Our vision is to become America’s premier cancer testing laboratory by delivering uncompromising quality, exceptional service and innovative products and solutions. The Company has laboratory locations in Ft. Myers and Tampa, Florida; Irvine, California; and Nashville, Tennessee, and currently offers the following types of testing services:

Cytogenetics testing – the study of normal and abnormal chromosomes and their relationship to disease. Cytogenetic studies are often utilized to assist in refining treatment options for hematopoietic cancers such as leukemia and lymphoma;

Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization (“FISH”) testing – a branch of cancer genetics that focuses on detecting and locating the presence or absence of specific DNA sequences and genes on chromosomes;

Flow cytometry testing – a rapid way to measure the characteristics of cell populations. Cells from peripheral blood, bone marrow aspirate, lymph nodes, and other areas are labeled with selective fluorescent antibodies and quantified according to their surface antigens. These fluorescent antibodies bind to specific cell surface antigens and are used to identify malignant cell populations. Flow cytometry is typically performed in conjunction with morphology testing which looks at smears on glass slides for abnormal cell populations;

Immunohistochemistry (“IHC”) testing – the process of identifying cell proteins in a tissue section utilizing the principle of antibodies binding specifically to antigens. Specific surface cytoplasmic or nuclear markers are characteristic of cellular events such as proliferation or cell death (apoptosis). IHC is also widely used to understand the distribution and localization of differentially expressed proteins; and

Molecular testing – a rapidly emerging cancer diagnostic tool focusing on the analysis of DNA and RNA, as well as the structure and function of genes at a molecular level. Molecular testing employs multiple technologies including point mutation analysis, bi-directional sequencing analysis, DNA fragment length analysis, and real-time polymerase chain reaction (“RT-PCR”) RNA analysis.

All of these testing services are widely utilized to inform the diagnosis and prognosis of various types and subtypes of cancer and to help predict a patient’s potential response to specific therapies. NeoGenomics offers testing services on both a “tech-only” basis, where NeoGenomics performs the technical component of the testing (specimen set-up, staining, imaging, sorting and categorization of cells, chromosomes, genes or DNA) and the client physician performs the related professional interpretation component (analyzing the laboratory data, developing the diagnosis or prognosis as well as preparing and writing the final report), as well as on a full service or “global” basis where NeoGenomics performs both the technical component and the professional interpretation component.

Our Focus

Our primary focus is to provide high complexity, cancer-related laboratory testing services to hospitals, community-based pathology practices, and clinicians throughout the United States. We currently perform analyses for hematopoietic cancers such as leukemia and lymphoma (blood and lymphoid tumors) and solid tumor cancers such as breast, lung, colon, and bladder cancer. For hematopoietic cancers, we typically analyze bone marrow aspirate and peripheral blood specimens. For solid tumor cancers, we typically analyze formalin fixed, paraffin embedded tissue samples or urine.

The cancer testing services we offer to community-based pathologists are designed to be a natural extension of, and complementary to, the services that they perform within their own practices. We believe our relationship as a non-competitive partner to community-based pathology practices empowers them to expand their breadth of testing and provide a menu of services that matches or exceeds the level of service found in academic centers of excellence around the country. Community-based pathology practices typically order our services on a “tech-only” basis, which allows them to participate in the diagnostic process by performing the professional interpretation services without having to make the investment in laboratory personnel or equipment needed to perform the technical component of the tests.

In areas where we do not provide services to community-based pathology practices, we may directly serve oncology, dermatology, urology and other clinician practices that prefer to have a direct relationship with a laboratory for cancer-related genetic and molecular testing services. We typically service these types of clients with a “global” service offering where we perform both the technical and professional components of the tests ordered. Increasingly, however, larger clinician practices have begun to internalize pathology testing, and our “tech-only” service offering allows these larger clinician practices to also participate in the diagnostic process by performing the professional interpretation services.

We are also focused on innovation because we are committed to being a leader in oncology testing. With the recent advances in genomics, proteomics and digital pathology, frequently large amounts of data are generated and managing this data is difficult without the aid of computer-based algorithms and pattern recognition. We believe that the best system for pattern recognition and data analysis is a technology known as Support Vector Machine or “SVM”, especially when combined with a technology called Recursive Feature Elimination or “RFE”.

Health Discovery Corporation (“HDC”) has an extensive array of pending and issued patents surrounding SVM and RFE technology. By licensing this technology and combining the expertise that already existed at Health Discovery Corp with our expertise in genomics, proteomics and digital imaging, we believe we are well-positioned to begin developing innovative and proprietary new products.

We have greatly expanded our menu of molecular tests in the past six months. Molecular testing is a rapidly growing part of oncology testing, allowing us to determine types of cancer, as well as predicted responses to certain therapeutics. We have combined several molecular tests into NeoType^TM panels, which will help pathologists and oncologists determine cancer types on difficult cases. We use bi-directional sequencing analysis which we believe is superior to many of the molecular tests being offered by our competitor’s because we are able to pick up mutations that other methods would not detect. With our strong menu of molecular tests we are positioned to capitalize on this rapidly growing area.

Our goal is to develop new assays to help our physicians better manage their patients and to enable them to practice evidence-based medicine tailored specifically for each of their patients. High priority will be given to the development of better tests for the diagnosis and prediction of clinical behavior in prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, leukemia/lymphoma and other solid tumors.

We intend to combine and analyze data from genomics, proteomics and digital imaging using SVM-RFE techniques to develop practical, cost-effective and reliable new assays. Using this technology, we believe we will be able to offer a whole line of advanced tests that will help physicians better manage the treatment options for cancer patients.

Competitive Strengths

Turnaround Times

We strive to provide industry leading turnaround times for test results to our clients nationwide. By providing information to physicians in a rapid manner, they can begin treating their patients as soon as possible. We believe our average 4-5

day turn-around time for our cytogenetics testing services, our average 3-4 day turn-around time for FISH testing services, and our average 1 day turn-around time for flow cytometry testing services are industry-leading benchmarks for national laboratories. Our consistent timeliness of results is a competitive strength and a driver of additional testing requests by our referring physicians. Quick turn-around times allow for the performance of other adjunctive tests within an acceptable diagnosis window in order to augment or confirm results and more fully inform treatment options. We believe that our rapid turnaround times are a key differentiator of NeoGenomics versus other national laboratories, and our clients often cite them as a key factor in their relationship with us.

Medical Team

Our team of medical professionals and Ph.Ds. are specialists in the field of genetics and oncology. Our medical team is led by our Chief Medical Officer, Dr. Maher Albitar, a renowned hematopathologist with extensive experience in molecular and genetic testing. Prior to joining NeoGenomics, Dr. Albitar was Medical Director for Hematopathology and Oncology at the Quest Nichols Institute and Chief R&D Director for Hematopathology and Oncology for Quest Diagnostics. He also served as Section Chief for Leukemia at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. In addition to Dr. Albitar, we employ other full-time M.D.s and Ph.Ds.

Extensive Tech-Only Service Offerings

We launched the first tech-only FISH testing services in the United States in 2006, and we currently have the most extensive menu of tech-only FISH services in the country. Indeed, we believe we are the only national laboratory offering tech-only FISH services for hematopoietic cancers in the U.S. We also offer tech-only flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry testing services. These types of testing services generally allow the professional interpretation component of a test to be billed separately from the technical component. Our NeoFISH^TM, NeoFLOW^TM and other tech-only service offerings allow properly trained and credentialed community-based pathologists to extend their own practices by performing professional interpretations services, which allows them to better service the needs of their local clientele without the need to invest in the lab equipment and personnel required to perform the technical component of genetic and molecular testing.

Our tech-only services are designed to give pathologists the option to choose, on a case by case basis, whether they want to order just the technical information and images relating to a specific test so they can perform the professional interpretation, or order “global” services and receive a comprehensive test report which includes a NeoGenomics Pathologist’s interpretation of the test results. Our clients appreciate the flexibility to access NeoGenomics’ medical staff for difficult or complex cases or when they are otherwise unavailable to perform professional interpretations. We believe this innovative approach to serving the needs of pathology client’s results in longer term, more committed client relationships that are more akin to strategic partnerships. Our extensive tech-only service offerings have differentiated NeoGenomics and allowed us to compete more effectively against larger, more entrenched competitors in our niche of the industry.

Global Service Offerings

We also offer a full set of global services to meet the needs of those clients who are not credentialed and trained in interpreting genetic tests and who are looking for specialists to interpret the testing results for them. In our global service offerings, our lab performs the technical component of the tests and our M.D.s and Ph.Ds. provide the interpretation services. Our professional staff is also available for post testing consultative services. These clients rely on the expertise of our medical team to give them the answers they need in a timely manner to help inform their diagnoses and treatment decisions. Many of our tech-only clients also rely on our medical team for difficult or challenging cases by ordering our global testing services on a case by case basis. Our Genetic Pathology Solutions (“GPS”) report summarizes all relevant case data from our global services on one summary report. When providing global services, NeoGenomics performs both the technical and professional component of the test, which results in a higher reimbursement level.

Superior Testing Platforms

We use some of the most advanced testing platforms in the laboratory industry. We were one of the first laboratories to widely offer 10-Color Flow Cytometry. Most of our competitors offer between 5 and 8 color Flow Cytometry testing. We believe that this allows us to provide more and better data to our clients. The use of bi-directional sequencing in our molecular testing allows us to detect multiple mutations which can be missed with single point mutation analysis. Our automated FISH and Cytogenetics tools allow us to deliver the highest quality testing to our clients.

Client Education Programs

We believe we have one of the most extensive client education programs in the genetic and molecular testing industry. We train pathologists how to use and interpret genetic testing services so that they can then participate in our tech-only service offerings. Our educational programs include an extensive library of on-demand training modules, online courses, and custom tailored on-site training programs that are designed to prepare clients to utilize our tech-only services. Each year, we also regularly sponsor seminars and webinars on emerging topics of interest in our field. Our medical staff is involved in many aspects of our training programs.

Laboratory Information System (LIS)

We believe we have a state-of-the-art Laboratory Information System (“LIS”) that interconnects our locations and provides flexible reporting solutions to clients. This system allows us to standardize testing and deliver uniform test results and images throughout our network, regardless of the location that any specific portion of a test is performed within our network. This allows us to move specimens and image analysis work between locations to better balance our workload. Our LIS also allows us to offer highly specialized and customizable reporting solutions to our tech-only clients. For instance, our tech-only NeoFISH^TM and NeoFLOW^TM applications allow our community-based pathologist clients to tailor individual reports to their specifications and incorporate only the images they select and then issue and sign-out such reports from our system with their own logos at the top. Our customized reporting solution even allows our clients to incorporate test results performed on ancillary tests not performed at NeoGenomics into summary report templates. This feature has been well-received by clients.

National Direct Sales Force

Our direct sales force has been trained extensively in cancer genetic testing and consultative selling skills to service the needs of clients. Our sales representatives (“Territory Business Managers”) are organized into three regions (Northeast, Southeast and West). These sales representatives all utilize Salesforce.com to manage their territories, and we have integrated all of the important customer care functionality within our LIS into Salesforce.com so that our Territory Business Managers can stay informed of emerging issues and opportunities within their regions.

Geographic Locations

Many high complexity laboratories within the cancer testing niche have frequently operated a core facility on either the West Coast or the East Coast to service the needs of their customers around the country. We believe our clients and prospects desire to do business with a laboratory with national breadth and a local presence. We have four facilities, two large laboratory locations in Fort Myers, Florida and Irvine, California and two smaller laboratory locations in Nashville, Tennessee and Tampa, Florida. Our objective is to “operate one lab with four locations” in order to deliver standardized test results. We intend to continue to develop and open new laboratories or expand our current facilities as market situations dictate and business opportunities arise.

Scientific Pipeline

In the past few years our field has experienced a rapid increase in tests that are tied to specific “genomic pathways”. These predictive tests are typically individualized for a small sub-set of patients with a specific subtype of cancer. The therapeutic target in the genomic pathways is typically a small molecule found at the level of the cell surface, within the cytoplasm and/or within the nucleus. These genomic pathways, known as the “Hallmarks of Cancer”, contain a target-rich environment for small-molecule “anti-therapies”. These anti-therapies target specific mutations in the major cancer pathways such as the Proliferation Pathway, the Apoptotic Pathway, the Angiogenic Pathway, the Metastasis Pathway, and the Signaling Pathways and Anti-Signaling Pathways.

As an example, recently the FDA approved a small molecule anti-therapy drug (Xalkori) that targets a mutation in the ALK gene for a small sub-set of patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Approximately 50-61% of patients with an ALK gene rearrangement will respond to this therapy. To identify patients eligible for this specific small-molecule therapy,

an FDA-approved FISH test that NeoGenomics and certain other laboratories offer, must be performed. This ALK FISH test is considered a companion diagnostic test and it is critical that this test be performed and the patient found to have an ALK mutation before therapy can be administered. Tests such as the ALK FISH test allow our clients to direct individualized treatments to each cancer patient in a timely manner. We are increasingly focused on attempting to develop new predictive tests such as this in our new product development pipeline. We have already brought up over 20 molecular tests in fiscal year 2012 and anticipate at least a dozen more by year-end. We have also greatly expanded our IHC menu and our digital pathology platform, areas we believe will help to drive future growth.

We are working with the technology we licensed from HDC to develop new proprietary cancer tests. We are working on technology we believe could streamline our workflow and reduce our costs along with providing a revenue stream by selling it to other laboratories around the world.

Seasonality

The majority of our testing volume is dependent on patients being treated by hematology/oncology professionals and other healthcare providers. Volume of testing generally declines during the vacation seasons, year-end holiday periods and other major holidays, particularly when those holidays fall during the middle of the week. In addition, volume of testing tends to decline due to adverse weather conditions, such as heavy snow, excessively hot or cold spells or hurricanes, tornados in certain regions, consequently reducing revenues and cash flows in any affected period. Therefore, comparison of the results of successive periods may not accurately reflect trends for future periods.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions and select accounting policies that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

While many operational aspects of our business are subject to complex federal, state and local regulations, the accounting for our business is generally straightforward with net revenues primarily recognized upon completion of the testing process. Our revenues are primarily comprised of laboratory tests, and approximately one-half of total operating costs and expenses consist of employee compensation and benefits. Due to the nature of our business, several of our accounting policies involve significant estimates and judgments. These accounting policies have been described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Intangible Assets

In the three month period ended March 31, 2012 we acquired approximately $3.0 million of intangible assets related to our Master License Agreement (“the License Agreement”) with Health Discovery Corporation (“HDC”) pursuant to which we were granted an exclusive worldwide license to utilize 84 issued and pending patents to develop and commercialize laboratory developed tests (“LDTs”) and other products relating to hematopoietic and solid tumor cancers. The licensed intellectual property and know-how relates to support vector machine (“SVM”), recursive feature elimination (“SVM-RFE”), fractal genomic modeling (“FGM”) and other pattern recognition technology as well as certain patents relating to digital image analysis, biomarker discovery, and gene and protein-based diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive testing.

Under the terms of the License Agreement, we may, subject to certain limitations, use, develop, make, have made, modify, sell, and commercially exploit products and services in the fields of laboratory testing, molecular diagnostics, clinical pathology, anatomic pathology and digital image analysis relating to the development, marketing, production or sale of any LDTs or other products used for diagnosing, ruling out, predicting a response to treatment, and/or monitoring treatment of any hematopoietic and solid tumor cancers excluding cancers affecting the retina and breast cancer (collectively, the “Field”).

The License Agreement allows us to develop and sell any gene, gene-product or protein-based LDTs based on HDC’s technology in the Field and provides for sublicensing rights and the assignment of the License Agreement, in whole or in part, in our discretion. The License Agreement further provides us with access to certain HDC personnel and consulting resources in the fields of mathematics and in genetic and molecular test development. The licensed technology also

includes, among other things, certain tests, algorithms and computer software which have already been developed by HDC. Initially, we intend to focus on developing prostate, pancreatic, and colon cancer LDTs. In addition, we plan to develop interpretation software that will help to automate the analysis of cytogenetics and flow cytometry tests.

The intangible assets were valued at fair value based on cost of the assets as we acquired the assets in an arms-length transaction. We present intangible assets net of accumulated amortization in our financial statements. We have three classes of intangible assets and each class of intangible assets is amortized over its estimated service period from service date through the weighted average patent expiration date of each class of patents or the period of economic benefit.

Results of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 as Compared to the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011

The following table presents the consolidated statements of operations as a percentage of revenue:


	For the three months ended June 30,						For the six months ended June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011
NET REVENUE		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%		100.0	%
COST OF REVENUE		52.8	%		55.5	%		52.8	%		55.8	%

GROSS PROFIT		47.2	%		44.5	%		47.2	%		44.2	%

OPERATING EXPENSES:
General and administrative		26.0	%		27.9	%		25.4	%		29.2	%
Research and development		3.4	%		1.6	%		3.3	%		1.5	%
Sales and marketing		12.4	%		16.1	%		12.9	%		17.8	%

TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES		41.8	%		45.6	%		41.6	%		48.5	%

INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS		5.4	%		(1.1	)%		5.6	%		(4.3	)%

INTEREST AND OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) – NET		(1.9	)%		(1.7	)%		(1.8	)%		(1.9	)%
NET INCOME (LOSS)		3.5	%		(2.8	)%		3.8	%		(6.2	)%

Revenue

Supplemental Information on Customer Requisitions Received and Tests Performed

(in thousands, except test and requisition amount)


	For the three months ended June 30,							For the six months ended June 30,
	2012		2011		% Inc (Dec)			2012		2011		% Inc (Dec)
Requisitions Rec’d (cases)		18,561		11,924		55.7	%		35,495		22,138		60.3	%
Number of Tests Performed		28,846		18,358		57.1	%		55,778		33,754		65.2	%
Avg. # of Tests/Requisition		1.55		1.54		0.9	%		1.57		1.52		3.1	%

Total Testing Revenue	$	15,611	$	10,466		49.2	%	$	30,771	$	19,271		59.7	%
Avg Revenue/Requisition	$	841.09	$	877.75		(4.2	)%	$	866.92	$	870.48		(0.4	)%
Avg Revenue/Test	$	541.20	$	570.12		(5.1	)%	$	551.67	$	570.92		(3.4	)%

Our increase in test counts and revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 when compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 was primarily the result of adding new client accounts as well as the expansion of our relationship with a large oncology practice to multiple new office locations. All of the office locations of this oncology practice combined represented approximately 15.3% and 16.6% of our revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to 9.9% and 6.0% of our revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. In addition, we

have seen a rapid increase in molecular testing volumes and we anticipate continued growth as we plan to expand our Molecular testing menu. The decrease in average revenue per test for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 was almost entirely due to a shift in test mix. Lower priced molecular and histology tests now make up a greater percentage of our test mix and our total revenue compared to last year.

The Medicare Technical Component Grandfather Clause (“TC Grandfather Clause”) expired on June 30, 2012. The result is that we are now required to directly bill hospitals for the technical component of certain tests performed on behalf of Medicare in-patients and out-patients, whereas previously we were allowed to bill Medicare directly for such services if they were provided to hospitals that were “grandfathered” under the regulations. We estimate this regulation change will result in competitive pricing scenarios, as we negotiate pricing with our hospital clients and we expect a 5-8% reduction in our overall average unit price per test.

Cost of Revenue and Gross Profit

Cost of revenue includes payroll and payroll related costs for performing tests, depreciation of laboratory equipment, rent for laboratory facilities, laboratory reagents, probes and supplies, and delivery and courier costs relating to the transportation of specimens to be tested.


	For the three months ended June 30,									For the six months ended June 30,
	2012			2011			Change			2012			2011			Change
Cost of revenue	$	8,244,000		$	5,810,000		$	2,434,000		$	16,261,000		$	10,750,000		$	5,511,000
Cost of revenue as a % of revenue		52.8	%		55.5	%					52.8	%		55.8	%
Gross Profit	$	7,367,000		$	4,656,000		$	2,711,000		$	14,510,000		$	8,521,000		$	5,989,000
Gross Profit as a % of revenue		47.2	%		44.5	%					47.2	%		44.2	%
Cost of Revenue per Test	$	285.81		$	316.49		$	(30.68	)	$	291.53		$	318.48		$	(26.95	)
Gross Profit per Test	$	255.39		$	253.63		$	1.76		$	260.15		$	252.44		$	7.71

Overall cost of revenue increased due to the large increase in testing volumes. Cost as a percentage of revenue decreased by 2.7 margin points for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and by 3.0 margin points for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The declines in average cost per test for these periods are a result of improved productivity in our laboratory, as we saw an increase in the amount of tests processed per laboratory FTE (full time equivalent). This was driven by improved capacity planning and utilization along with several process improvements in the laboratory. We also saw a reduction in our send-out tests to other laboratories as a result of our expanded Molecular testing menu and expanded medical staff. We continue to focus on laboratory operations and on streamlining our processes in order to continue to drive further gross margin improvements.

We estimate that based on our best practices teams and current projects that we will continue to see a reduction in average cost per test in future periods. We will see a reduction in gross margin percentage due to the reduction in average unit price related to the expiration of the TC Grandfather clause.

Sales and Marketing


	For the three months ended June 30,									For the six months ended June 30,
	2012			2011			Change			2012			2011			Change
Sales and marketing	$	1,934,000		$	1,684,000		$	(250,000	)	$	3,969,000		$	3,437,000		$	(532,000	)
As a % of revenue		12.4	%		16.1	%					12.9	%		17.8	%

Sales and marketing expenses relate primarily to the employee related costs of our sales, marketing, and customer service personnel and costs from marketing and advertising efforts.

Sales and marketing expenses increased approximately 14.8%, or $250,000 to $1.93 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to $1.68 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Sales and marketing expenses increased approximately 15.5%, or $532,000 to $3.97 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to $3.44 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. These increases were the result of increased sales commissions

related to the increase in revenue. Our sales and marketing costs as a percentage of revenue declined for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 as a result of operating leverage on our increased revenues.

We expect our overall sales and marketing expenses to increase modestly with increased test volumes in 2012 but to decline slightly as a percentage of revenue.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses relate to billing, bad debts, finance, human resources, information technology and other administrative functions. They primarily consist of employee related costs (such as salaries, fringe benefits, and stock-based compensation expense), professional services, facilities expense, and depreciation and administrative-related costs allocated to general and administrative expenses.


	For the three months ended June 30,								For the six months ended June 30,
	2012			2011			Change		2012			2011			Change
General and administrative	$	4,066,000		$	2,914,000		$	1,152,000	$	7,816,000		$	5,618,000		$	2.198.000
As a % of revenue		26.0	%		27.9	%				25.4	%		29.2	%

General and administrative expenses increased approximately 39.5%, or $1.15 million to $4.07 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to $2.91 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. General and administrative expenses increased approximately 39.1%, or $2.20 million to $7.82 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to $5.62 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily a result of adding information technology and billing personnel to support the increase in our testing volumes as well as health insurance costs, technology costs related to the co-location of mission critical information technology applications to a secure facility in Tampa, Florida, recruiting expenses to hire new employees across the organization and an increase in corporate performance based bonuses. We also began to incur costs related to our planned move into our new Irvine, California laboratory. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenue declined in the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 because our we have reached critical mass in our infrastructure and we don’t need to grow infrastructure at the same pace we grow revenue.

Bad debt expense increased by approximately 74.1%, or approximately $381,000 to $895,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to approximately $514,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. This increase was primarily a result of the 49% increase in revenue and to a lesser extent by an increase in bad debt as a percentage of revenue. Bad debt expense increased by approximately 56.5%, or approximately $626,000 to $1,735,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to approximately $1,109,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. This increase was primarily a result of the 60% increase in revenue partially offset by a 0.1% decline in bad debt as a percentage of revenue.

We expect our overall general and administrative expenses to increase as we add personnel, increase our billing and collections activities; incur additional expenses associated with the expansion of our facilities and backup systems; incur additional bad debt expense related to increasing sales, and as we continue to build our physical infrastructure to support our anticipated growth. However, we expect general and administrative expenses to continue to decline as a percentage of our revenue as our case volumes increase and as we continue to develop more operating leverage in our business.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses relate to cost of developing new proprietary and non-proprietary genetic tests as well as cost related to our licensing agreement with Health Discovery Corporation, including amortization of the licensed technology.


	For the three months ended June30,								For the six months ended June 30,
	2012			2011			Change		2012			2011			Change
Research and development	$	528,000		$	172,000		$	356,000	$	1,025,000		$	291,000		$	734,000
As a % of revenue		3.4	%		1.6	%				3.3	%		1.5	%

Research and development expenses increased approximately 207.0%, or $356,000 to $528,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to approximately $172,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Research and development expenses increased approximately 252.3%, or $734,000 to $1,025,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to approximately $291,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in research and development expenses is primarily a result of increased personnel and supply costs to develop and launch new molecular tests as well as to develop proprietary testing products and services pursuant to our license with Health Discovery Corporation.

We expect our research and development expenses in future quarters to remain relatively stable from the level of our expenses incurred for the three months ended June 30, 2012.

Other (Income) Expense

Other income and expense primarily consists of the interest expense we incur on our borrowing arrangements (primarily comprised of interest payable on advances under our revolving credit facility with Capital Source and interest paid on capital lease obligations) offset by the interest income we earn on cash deposits. Interest expense increased from approximately $179,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 to $288,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2012. Interest expense increased from approximately $361,000 in for the six months ended June 30, 2011 to $546,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012. This reflects higher borrowings, particularly related to our revolving credit facility and capital lease obligations as we acquired additional equipment to support our increasing testing volumes.

Net Income (Loss)

As a result of the foregoing, we reported net income of $551,000, or $0.01/share, for the three months ended June 30, 2012 as compared to a net loss of $293,000 or ($0.01)/share, for the three months ended June 30, 2011. For the six months ended June 30, 2012 we reported net income of $1,154,000, or $0.03/share, as compared to a net loss of $1,186,000 or ($0.03)/share, for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

Non-GAAP Measures

“Adjusted EBITDA” is defined by NeoGenomics as net income (loss) from continuing operations before (i) interest expense, (ii) tax expense and therapeutic discovery tax grants, (iii) depreciation and amortization expense, (iv) non-cash stock-based compensation and warrant amortization expense and (v) other extraordinary or non-recurring charges. NeoGenomics believes that Adjusted EBITDA provides a more consistent measurement of operating performance and trends across reporting periods by excluding these cash and non-cash items of expense not directly related to ongoing operations from income. Adjusted EBITDA also assists investors in performing analysis that is consistent with financial models developed by research analysts.

Adjusted EBITDA as defined by NeoGenomics is not a measurement under GAAP and may differ from non-GAAP measures used by other companies. There are limitations inherent in non-GAAP financial measures such as Adjusted EBITDA because they exclude a variety of charges and credits that are required to be included in a GAAP presentation, and do not therefore present the full measure of NeoGenomics recorded costs against its net revenue. Accordingly, investors should consider non-GAAP results together with GAAP results in analyzing NeoGenomics financial performance.

The following is a reconciliation of GAAP net income (loss) to Non-GAAP EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for the three and six months ending June 30, 2012 and 2011:


	For the three months ended June 30,					For the six months ended June 30,
	2012		2011			2012		2011
*Net income (loss) (Per GAAP)*	$	551,000	$	(293,000	)	$	1,154,000	$	(1,186,000	)
Adjustments to Net Income (Loss):
Interest expense (income), net		288,000		178,000			546,000		360,000
Income taxes		—		—			—		—
Depreciation and amortization		912,000		475,000			1,675,000		963,000

EBITDA		1,751,000		360,000			3,375,000		137,000
Further Adjustments to EBITDA:
Non-cash stock-based compensation		192,000		123,000			343,000		249,000

Adjusted EBITDA (non-GAAP)	$	1,943,000	$	483,000		$	3,718,000	$	386,000

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

We have established a reserve for uncollectible amounts which is estimated based on the aging of accounts receivable within each payer category and our historical data on bad debts in these aging categories. In addition, the allowance is adjusted periodically for other relevant factors, including regularly assessing the state of our billing operations in order to identify issues which may impact the collectability of receivables or allowance estimates. Revisions to the allowance are recorded as an adjustment to bad debt expense within general and administrative expenses. After appropriate collection efforts have been exhausted, specific receivables deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance in the period they are deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of receivables previously written-off are recorded as credits to the allowance. Total adjustments for incremental revenue from tests in which we underestimated the revenue in previous years from collections we received in the current year are not material to the Company’s results of operations in any period presented. Our estimates of net revenue are subject to change based on the contractual status and payment policies of the third party payers with whom we deal. We regularly refine our estimates in order to make our estimated revenue as accurate as possible based on our most recent collection experience with each third party payer.


	June 30,
	2012			2011			Change		% Change
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	2,466,000		$	1,843,000		$	623,000		34	%
As a % of gross accounts receivable		18	%		20	%

The $623,000 increase in the allowance for doubtful accounts is the result of increased revenue causing our receivable balance to increase. However, our allowance as a percentage of gross accounts receivable has declined as a result of our being on contract with more managed care payers and an improvement in our receivable aging. Bad debt expense as a percentage of revenue was 5.7% for the three month period ended June 30, 2012 as compared to 4.9% of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2011. For the six month period ended June 30, 2012 bad debt expense as a percentage of revenue was 5.6% as compared to 5.8% of revenue for the six month period ended June 30, 2011.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following table presents a summary of our cash flows provided by (used in) operating, investing and financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 as well as the period ending cash and cash equivalents and working capital.


	For the six months ended June 30,
	2012			2011
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities	$	16,000		$	(1,054,000	)
Investing activities		(2,050,000	)		(125,000	)
Financing activities		1,972,000			2,714,000

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(62,000	)		1,535,000
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		2,628,000			1,097,000

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period (1)	$	2,566,000		$	2,632,000

Working Capital (2), end of period	$	1,460,000		$	1,911,000

(1)	Excludes restricted cash of $0.3M in 2012 and $0.5M in 2011.

(2)	Defined as current assets minus current liabilities.

Our net cash provided by operating activities is driven primarily by our increase in net income almost entirely offset by increases in our accounts receivable. Our accounts receivable balance has increased as a result of our 60% revenue growth during the six months ended June 30, 2012. Our accounts receivable balance has also increased as the American Medical Association introduced new Molecular billing codes that went into effect on January 1, 2012. Only some payers have adopted these new codes, which has complicated billing. Complications from the different billing formats have increased our “re-bill rate” for molecular testing and have increased balances in accounts receivable.

Upon the execution of the License Agreement, we paid HDC $1,000,000 in cash and issued to HDC 1,360,000 shares of our common stock which had a market value of $1,945,000 using the closing price of $1.43 per share for the Company’s common stock on the OTCQB Market on January 6, 2012. We have recorded this transaction as a purchase of intangible assets.

I.)

II.)	Extends the term of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement to March 26, 2015;

III.)

Revises the definition of “Minimum Termination Fee” to be:

2.5% of the Facility Cap if the “Revolver Termination” (as defined in the Agreement) is at any time before March 26, 2013;

1.5% of the Facility Cap if the Revolver Termination is after March 26, 2013 but before March 26, 2014;

0.5% of the Facility Cap if the Revolver Termination is on or after March 26, 2014; and

That there shall be no Minimum Termination Fee if the Revolver Termination occurs within five (5) days of the end of the term.

IV.)	Modifies the definition of “Permitted Indebtedness” and “Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio”; and

V.)	Amends Section 3.1 of the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by deleting “the LIBOR shall be not less than 2.0%” and replacing it with “the LIBOR shall be not less than 1.0%”.

We paid Capital Source a commitment fee of $80,000 in connection with the Amendment.

Interest on outstanding advances under the Credit Facility are payable monthly in arrears on the first day of each calendar month and has an effective rate of interest of 5.25%.

On June 30, 2012 the available credit under the Credit Facility was approximately $1.6 million and the outstanding borrowing was $6.4 million after netting compensating cash on hand.

On July 27, 2012 the Facility Cap was increased from $8.0 million to $9.0 million.

We have unrestricted cash on hand of $2,566,000 as of June 30, 2012, along with the unused portion of our credit line. As such, we believe we have adequate resources to meet our operating commitments for the next twelve months.

Capital Expenditures

We currently forecast capital expenditures in order to execute on our business plan. The amount and timing of such capital expenditures will be determined by the volume of business, but we currently anticipate that we will need to purchase approximately $5.0 million to $6.0 million of additional capital equipment during the next year. We plan to fund these purchases primarily through capital lease financing arrangements. If we are unable to obtain such funding, we will need to pay cash for these items or we will be required to curtail our equipment purchases, which may have an impact on our ability to continue to grow our revenues.

Related Party Transactions

Consulting Agreements

During the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, Steven C. Jones, a director of the Company, earned approximately $52,500 and $50,000, respectively, for various consulting work performed in connection with his duties as Executive Vice President of Finance. During the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, he earned approximately $102,500 and $100,000, respectively, for various consulting work performed in connection with his duties as Executive Vice President of Finance. Mr. Jones also received $55,000 and $6,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 as payment of his annual bonus compensation for the previous fiscal year.

ITEM 3 — Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide information under this item.

ITEM 4 — Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.

As required by SEC Rule 15d-15, our management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the three months ended June 30, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1 — LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time the Company is engaged in legal proceeding in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe any current legal proceedings are material to our business.

ITEM 1A — RISK FACTORS

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide information under this item. However current and prospective investors are encouraged to review the risks set forth in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2012.

ITEM 2 — UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None

ITEM 3 — DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not Applicable

ITEM 4 — MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not Applicable

ITEM 5 — OTHER INFORMATION

None

ITEM 6 — EXHIBITS


EXHIBIT NO.		DESCRIPTION

10.1+		First Amendment to Amended and Restated Revolving Credit and Security Agreement dated March 26, 2012 among NeoGenomics, Inc., NeoGenomics Laboratories, Inc. and CapitalSource Finance LLC as incorporated by reference to the Company’s Post Effective Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1 (333-166526) filed with the SEC on April 27, 2012

31.1**		Certification by Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/ 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2**		Certification by Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/ 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.3**		Certification by Principal Accounting Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/ 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1**		Certification by Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

**		Provided herewith

+		Confidential treatment previously requested and granted with respect to certain portions, which portions were omitted and filed separately with the SEC.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


Date: August 6, 2012	NEOGENOMICS, INC.

	By:	/s/ Douglas M. VanOort
		Name:	Douglas M. VanOort
		Title:	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

	By:	/s/ George Cardoza
		Name:	George Cardoza
		Title:	Chief Financial Officer

	By:	/s/ Edwin F. Weidig III
		Name:	Edwin F. Weidig III
		Title:	Director of Finance and
			Principal Accounting Officer

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company