e10vq
FORM 10-Q
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For The Quarterly Period
Ended March 31, 2005 |
|
Commission File Number:
0-22832 |
ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
|
Maryland
(State or Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization) |
|
52-1081052
(IRS Employer
Identification No.) |
1919 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20006
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(202) 331-1112
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter periods as the Registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES x NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated
filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)
YES x NO o
On May 6, 2005, there were 133,613,932 shares
outstanding of the Registrants common stock, $0.0001 par
value.
ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2005 (unaudited)
and
December 31, 2004
|
|
1 |
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Operations (unaudited) For
the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
|
|
2 |
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Net Assets
(unaudited) For the Three Months Ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004
|
|
3 |
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (unaudited) For
the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
|
|
4 |
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Investments as of March 31, 2005
(unaudited)
|
|
5 |
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
15 |
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
38 |
|
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
|
39 |
|
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk
|
|
74 |
|
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
|
|
74 |
|
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
|
|
75 |
|
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and
Use of Proceeds
|
|
75 |
|
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
|
|
76 |
|
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security
Holders
|
|
76 |
|
Item 5. Other Information
|
|
76 |
|
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
77 |
|
Signatures
|
|
80 |
PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts) |
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
ASSETS |
Portfolio at value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private finance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companies more than 25% owned (cost: 2005-$1,426,861;
2004-$1,389,342)
|
|
$ |
1,437,474 |
|
|
$ |
1,359,641 |
|
|
|
Companies 5% to 25% owned (cost: 2005-$196,842; 2004-$194,750)
|
|
|
187,459 |
|
|
|
188,902 |
|
|
|
Companies less than 5% owned (cost: 2005-$786,607; 2004-$800,828)
|
|
|
753,537 |
|
|
|
753,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total private finance (cost: 2005-$2,410,310; 2004-$2,384,920)
|
|
|
2,378,470 |
|
|
|
2,302,086 |
|
|
Commercial real estate finance (cost: 2005-$809,613;
2004-$722,612)
|
|
|
816,536 |
|
|
|
711,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total portfolio at value (cost: 2005-$3,219,923; 2004-$3,107,532)
|
|
|
3,195,006 |
|
|
|
3,013,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits of proceeds from sales of borrowed Treasury securities
|
|
|
98,741 |
|
|
|
38,226 |
|
Accrued interest and dividends receivable
|
|
|
81,937 |
|
|
|
79,489 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
77,783 |
|
|
|
72,712 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
51,087 |
|
|
|
57,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
3,504,554 |
|
|
$ |
3,260,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable and debentures (maturing within one year:
2005-$165,000; 2004-$169,000)
|
|
$ |
1,033,135 |
|
|
$ |
1,064,568 |
|
|
Revolving line of credit
|
|
|
263,250 |
|
|
|
112,000 |
|
|
Obligations to replenish borrowed Treasury securities
|
|
|
98,741 |
|
|
|
38,226 |
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities
|
|
|
76,280 |
|
|
|
66,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,471,406 |
|
|
|
1,281,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized;
133,562,534 and 133,098,807 shares issued and outstanding at
March 31, 2005, and December 31, 2004, respectively
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
2,106,106 |
|
|
|
2,094,421 |
|
|
Common stock held in deferred compensation trust
|
|
|
(15,389 |
) |
|
|
(13,503 |
) |
|
Notes receivable from sale of common stock
|
|
|
(5,420 |
) |
|
|
(5,470 |
) |
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on portfolio
|
|
|
(37,183 |
) |
|
|
(107,767 |
) |
|
Undistributed (distributions in excess of) earnings
|
|
|
(14,979 |
) |
|
|
12,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
2,033,148 |
|
|
|
1,979,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
3,504,554 |
|
|
$ |
3,260,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value per common share
|
|
$ |
15.22 |
|
|
$ |
14.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
1
ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months | |
|
|
Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
Interest and Related Portfolio Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companies more than 25% owned
|
|
$ |
28,251 |
|
|
$ |
15,952 |
|
|
|
Companies 5% to 25% owned
|
|
|
5,921 |
|
|
|
5,986 |
|
|
|
Companies less than 5% owned
|
|
|
50,773 |
|
|
|
51,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest and dividends
|
|
|
84,945 |
|
|
|
73,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan prepayment premiums
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companies more than 25% owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companies 5% to 25% owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companies less than 5% owned
|
|
|
1,677 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loan prepayment premiums
|
|
|
1,677 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees and other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companies more than 25% owned
|
|
|
4,881 |
|
|
|
4,489 |
|
|
|
Companies 5% to 25% owned
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
Companies less than 5% owned
|
|
|
3,346 |
|
|
|
2,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fees and other income
|
|
|
8,297 |
|
|
|
7,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest and related portfolio income
|
|
|
94,919 |
|
|
|
81,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
20,225 |
|
|
|
19,113 |
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
15,456 |
|
|
|
12,355 |
|
|
Administrative
|
|
|
20,754 |
|
|
|
5,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
56,435 |
|
|
|
37,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income before income taxes
|
|
|
38,484 |
|
|
|
44,470 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(268 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
38,752 |
|
|
|
44,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gains (losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companies more than 25% owned
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
146,683 |
|
|
|
Companies 5% to 25% owned
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
4,628 |
|
|
|
Companies less than 5% owned
|
|
|
9,889 |
|
|
|
(3,461 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net realized gains
|
|
|
10,285 |
|
|
|
147,850 |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation
|
|
|
70,584 |
|
|
|
(172,087 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net gains (losses)
|
|
|
80,869 |
|
|
|
(24,237 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
$ |
119,621 |
|
|
$ |
20,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share
|
|
$ |
0.90 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share
|
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
133,283 |
|
|
|
128,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
135,579 |
|
|
|
131,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
2
ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months | |
|
|
Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$ |
38,752 |
|
|
$ |
44,545 |
|
|
Net realized gains
|
|
|
10,285 |
|
|
|
147,850 |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation
|
|
|
70,584 |
|
|
|
(172,087 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
|
119,621 |
|
|
|
20,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholder distributions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock dividends
|
|
|
(76,100 |
) |
|
|
(73,357 |
) |
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in net assets resulting from shareholder
distributions
|
|
|
(76,100 |
) |
|
|
(73,402 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital share transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock for portfolio investments
|
|
|
7,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock upon the exercise of stock options
|
|
|
2,618 |
|
|
|
11,782 |
|
|
Issuance of common stock in lieu of cash distributions
|
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
1,484 |
|
|
Net decrease in notes receivable from sale of common stock
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
5,192 |
|
|
Purchase of common stock held in deferred compensation trust
|
|
|
(1,886 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from capital share
transactions
|
|
|
9,849 |
|
|
|
18,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total increase (decrease) in net assets
|
|
|
53,370 |
|
|
|
(34,607 |
) |
Net assets at beginning of period
|
|
|
1,979,778 |
|
|
|
1,914,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets at end of period
|
|
$ |
2,033,148 |
|
|
$ |
1,879,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value per common share
|
|
$ |
15.22 |
|
|
$ |
14.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
133,563 |
|
|
|
128,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
3
ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months | |
|
|
Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(in thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
$ |
119,621 |
|
|
$ |
20,308 |
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio investments
|
|
|
(257,957 |
) |
|
|
(170,597 |
) |
|
|
Principal collections related to investment repayments or sales
|
|
|
158,262 |
|
|
|
237,161 |
|
|
|
Change in accrued or reinvested interest and dividends
|
|
|
(10,534 |
) |
|
|
(13,098 |
) |
|
|
Amortization of discounts and fees
|
|
|
(1,772 |
) |
|
|
(1,573 |
) |
|
|
Changes in other assets and liabilities
|
|
|
8,158 |
|
|
|
3,376 |
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
Realized gains from the receipt of notes and other securities as
consideration from sale of investments, net of collections
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
(48,318 |
) |
|
|
Realized losses
|
|
|
4,418 |
|
|
|
8,152 |
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized (appreciation) or depreciation
|
|
|
(70,584 |
) |
|
|
172,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(49,750 |
) |
|
|
207,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of common stock upon the exercise of stock options
|
|
|
2,618 |
|
|
|
11,782 |
|
|
Collections of notes receivable from sale of common stock
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
5,192 |
|
|
Borrowings under notes payable and debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,212 |
|
|
Repayments on notes payable and debentures
|
|
|
(31,000 |
) |
|
|
(7,000 |
) |
|
Net borrowings under (repayments on) revolving line of credit
|
|
|
151,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of common stock held in deferred compensation trust
|
|
|
(1,886 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Other financing activities
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
Common stock dividends and distributions paid
|
|
|
(77,343 |
) |
|
|
(71,873 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
43,677 |
|
|
|
(46,797 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(6,073 |
) |
|
|
161,110 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
57,160 |
|
|
|
214,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
51,087 |
|
|
$ |
375,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
4
ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INVESTMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Private Finance |
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company |
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
(in thousands, except number of shares) |
|
Investment(1)(2) |
|
Principal | |
|
Cost | |
|
Value | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Companies More Than 25% Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acme Paging,
L.P.(4)
|
|
Loan (6.8%, Due 12/07
1/08)(6) |
|
$ |
4,631 |
|
|
$ |
4,631 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
(Telecommunications)
|
|
Equity Interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (4,656 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advantage Sales & Marketing, Inc.
|
|
Loan (12.0%, Due 9/09) |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
59,743 |
|
|
|
59,743 |
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
Debt Securities (18.5%, Due 12/09) |
|
|
126,621 |
|
|
|
126,621 |
|
|
|
126,621 |
|
|
|
Common Stock (18,957,011 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,932 |
|
|
|
167,044 |
|
|
Alaris Consulting, LLC
|
|
Loan (16.3%, Due 12/05
12/07)(6) |
|
|
24,025 |
|
|
|
24,068 |
|
|
|
4,719 |
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
Equity Interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guaranty ($1,100) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American Healthcare Services, Inc.
|
|
Loan (1.0%, Due 12/04
12/05)(6) |
|
|
5,200 |
|
|
|
4,801 |
|
|
|
4,212 |
|
|
and Affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Healthcare Services)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avborne,
Inc.(7)
|
|
Preferred Stock (12,500 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,014 |
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
Common Stock (27,500 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avborne Heavy Maintenance,
Inc.(7)
|
|
Preferred Stock (1,568 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
Common Stock (2,750 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business Loan Express, LLC
|
|
Class A Equity Interests |
|
|
55,494 |
|
|
|
55,494 |
|
|
|
55,494 |
|
|
(Financial Services)
|
|
Class B Equity Interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,436 |
|
|
|
140,523 |
|
|
|
Class C Equity Interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,301 |
|
|
|
134,696 |
|
|
|
Guaranty ($104,574 See Note 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standby Letters of Credit
($35,550 See Note 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Callidus Capital Corporation
|
|
Loan (5.2%, Due 12/05) |
|
|
54,854 |
|
|
|
54,854 |
|
|
|
54,854 |
|
|
(Financial Services)
|
|
Loan (12.0%, Due 12/06) |
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
|
Debt Securities (18.0%, Due 10/08) |
|
|
4,234 |
|
|
|
4,234 |
|
|
|
4,234 |
|
|
|
Common Stock (10 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,867 |
|
|
|
4,100 |
|
|
Fairchild Industrial Products
|
|
Loan (8.5%, Due 7/09) |
|
|
6,668 |
|
|
|
6,668 |
|
|
|
6,668 |
|
|
Company
|
|
Debt Securities (12.1%, Due 7/09) |
|
|
3,729 |
|
|
|
3,729 |
|
|
|
3,729 |
|
|
(Industrial Products)
|
|
Common Stock (1,000 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,841 |
|
|
|
6,233 |
|
|
(1) Interest
rates represent the weighted average annual stated interest rate
on loans and debt securities, which are presented by nature of
indebtedness for a single issuer. The maturity dates represent
the earliest and the latest maturity dates. |
|
|
|
|
(2) Common
stock, preferred stock, warrants, options, and equity interests
are generally non-income producing and restricted. |
|
|
|
|
(3) Public
company. |
|
|
|
|
(4) Non-U.S. company
or principal place of business outside the U.S. |
|
|
|
|
(5) Non-registered
investment company. |
|
|
|
|
(6) Loan
or debt security is on non-accrual status and therefore is
considered non-income producing. |
|
|
|
|
(7) Avborne,
Inc. and Avborne Heavy Maintenance, Inc. are affiliated
companies. |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Private Finance |
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company |
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
(in thousands, except number of shares) |
|
Investment(1)(2) |
|
Principal | |
|
Cost | |
|
Value | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Financial Pacific Company
|
|
Loan (17.4%, Due 2/12 8/12) |
|
$ |
69,132 |
|
|
$ |
68,828 |
|
|
$ |
68,828 |
|
|
(Financial Services)
|
|
Preferred Stock (9,950 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,950 |
|
|
|
10,945 |
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (14,735 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,819 |
|
|
|
36,250 |
|
|
ForeSite Towers, LLC
|
|
Equity Interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,703 |
|
|
|
20,802 |
|
|
(Tower Leasing)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAC Investments, Inc.
|
|
Common Stock (107 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,350 |
|
|
|
7,049 |
|
|
(Broadcasting & Cable)
|
|
Guaranty ($800) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standby Letter of Credit ($200) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Communications, LLC
|
|
Loan (14.5%, Due 12/03 12/06) |
|
|
6,393 |
|
|
|
6,393 |
|
|
|
6,393 |
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
Debt Securities (13.0%, Due 9/02 9/05) |
|
|
18,321 |
|
|
|
18,318 |
|
|
|
18,318 |
|
|
|
Preferred Equity Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,067 |
|
|
|
14,723 |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gordian Group, Inc.
|
|
Loan (10.0%, Due 12/05
12/08)(6) |
|
|
11,392 |
|
|
|
11,434 |
|
|
|
5,698 |
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
Common Stock (1,000 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
HealthASPex, Inc.
|
|
Preferred Stock (1,000,000 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
Preferred Stock (1,451,380 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,900 |
|
|
|
1,507 |
|
|
|
Common Stock (1,451,380 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
HMT, Inc.
|
|
Debt Securities (13.3%, Due 12/08) |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
9,349 |
|
|
|
9,349 |
|
|
(Energy Services)
|
|
Preferred Stock (554,052 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,637 |
|
|
|
2,637 |
|
|
|
Common Stock (300,000 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
4,260 |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,155 |
|
|
|
1,640 |
|
|
Housecall Medical Resources, Inc.
|
|
Loan (16.8%, Due 11/07 11/09) |
|
|
15,757 |
|
|
|
15,704 |
|
|
|
15,704 |
|
|
(Healthcare Services)
|
|
Common Stock (864,000 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
34,032 |
|
|
Impact Innovations Group, LLC
(Business Services)
|
|
Equity Interests in Affiliate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
772 |
|
|
Insight Pharmaceuticals Corporation
|
|
Senior Loan (8.3%, Due 12/07) |
|
|
66,470 |
|
|
|
66,146 |
|
|
|
66,146 |
|
|
(Consumer Products)
|
|
Loan (15.0%, Due 12/09) |
|
|
57,500 |
|
|
|
57,237 |
|
|
|
57,237 |
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock (25,000 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
25,500 |
|
|
|
Common Stock (6,200 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,325 |
|
|
|
6,325 |
|
|
Jakel, Inc.
|
|
Loan (15.5%, Due
3/08)(6) |
|
|
5,412 |
|
|
|
5,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Industrial Products)
|
|
Debt Securities (15.5%, Due
3/08)(6) |
|
|
8,330 |
|
|
|
8,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock (6,460 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (158,061 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legacy Partners Group, LLC
|
|
Loan (14.0%, Due
5/09)(6) |
|
|
7,147 |
|
|
|
7,147 |
|
|
|
6,047 |
|
|
(Financial Services)
|
|
Debt Securities (18.0%, Due
5/09)(6) |
|
|
2,952 |
|
|
|
2,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Interest
rates represent the weighted average annual stated interest rate
on loans and debt securities, which are presented by nature of
indebtedness for a single issuer. The maturity dates represent
the earliest and the latest maturity dates. |
|
|
|
|
(2) Common
stock, preferred stock, warrants, options, and equity interests
are generally non-income producing and restricted. |
|
|
|
|
(3) Public
company. |
|
|
|
|
(4) Non-U.S. company
or principal place of business outside the U.S. |
|
|
|
|
(5) Non-registered
investment company. |
|
|
|
|
(6) Loan
or debt security is on non-accrual status and therefore is
considered non-income producing. |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Private Finance |
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company |
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
(in thousands, except number of shares) |
|
Investment(1)(2) |
|
Principal | |
|
Cost | |
|
Value | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Litterer
Beteiligungs-GmbH(4)
|
|
Debt Securities (8.0%, Due 3/07) |
|
$ |
677 |
|
|
$ |
677 |
|
|
$ |
677 |
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
Equity Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,756 |
|
|
|
3,431 |
|
|
Maui Body Works, Inc.
|
|
Common Stock (100 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Healthcare Services)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mercury Air Centers, Inc.
|
|
Senior Loan (10.0%, Due 4/09) |
|
|
23,500 |
|
|
|
23,500 |
|
|
|
23,500 |
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
Loan (16.0%, Due 4/09) |
|
|
38,540 |
|
|
|
38,356 |
|
|
|
38,356 |
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (57,068 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,723 |
|
|
|
33,723 |
|
|
|
|
Standby Letters of Credit ($1,322) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVL Group, Inc.
|
|
Loan (12.3%, Due 10/07 7/09) |
|
|
15,030 |
|
|
|
14,618 |
|
|
|
14,618 |
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
Debt Securities (14.4%, Due 7/09) |
|
|
18,153 |
|
|
|
17,661 |
|
|
|
17,661 |
|
|
|
Common Stock (648,661 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
6,082 |
|
|
Norstan Apparel Shops, Inc.
|
|
Loan (16.0%, Due
12/07)(6) |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Retail)
|
|
Debt Securities (17.8%, Due 12/07
9/08)(6) |
|
|
13,588 |
|
|
|
12,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (29,663 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pennsylvania Avenue Investors, L.P.
(5)
|
|
Equity Interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,289 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
(Private Equity Fund)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Powell Plant Farms, Inc.
|
|
Loan (15.0%, Due 12/05) |
|
|
37,790 |
|
|
|
28,942 |
|
|
|
28,942 |
|
|
(Consumer Products)
|
|
Debt Securities (20.0%, Due
6/03)(6) |
|
|
19,291 |
|
|
|
19,224 |
|
|
|
11,571 |
|
|
|
Preferred Stock (1,483 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redox Brands, Inc.
|
|
Preferred Stock (2,726,444 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,903 |
|
|
|
11,655 |
|
|
(Consumer Products)
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
Guaranty ($125) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Staffing Partners Holding
|
|
Loan (13.5%, Due
10/06)(6) |
|
|
974 |
|
|
|
974 |
|
|
|
974 |
|
|
Company, Inc.
|
|
Debt Securities (13.5%, Due
10/06)(6) |
|
|
5,906 |
|
|
|
5,906 |
|
|
|
5,906 |
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
Preferred Stock (439,600 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,968 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
Common Stock (69,773 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Startec Global Communications
|
|
Loan (10.0%, Due 5/07 5/09) |
|
|
16,518 |
|
|
|
16,518 |
|
|
|
16,518 |
|
|
Corporation
|
|
Common Stock (19,180,000 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,255 |
|
|
|
5,015 |
|
|
(Telecommunications)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STS Operating, Inc.
|
|
Loan (15.3%, Due 3/12) |
|
|
8,436 |
|
|
|
8,436 |
|
|
|
8,436 |
|
|
(Industrial Products)
|
|
Common Stock (3,000,000 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,522 |
|
|
|
12,948 |
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
companies more than 25% owned |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,426,861 |
|
|
$ |
1,437,474 |
|
|
Companies 5% to 25% Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
Air Evac Lifeteam
|
|
Debt Securities (12.9%, Due 7/10) |
|
$ |
41,493 |
|
|
$ |
41,322 |
|
|
$ |
41,322 |
|
|
(Healthcare Services)
|
|
Equity Interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
1,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Interest
rates represent the weighted average annual stated interest rate
on loans and debt securities, which are presented by nature of
indebtedness for a single issuer. The maturity dates represent
the earliest and the latest maturity dates. |
|
|
|
|
(2) Common
stock, preferred stock, warrants, options, and equity interests
are generally non-income producing and restricted. |
|
|
|
|
(3) Public
company. |
|
|
|
|
(4) Non-U.S. company
or principal place of business outside the U.S. |
|
|
|
|
(5) Non-registered
investment company. |
|
|
|
|
(6) Loan
or debt security is on non-accrual status and therefore is
considered non-income producing. |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Private Finance |
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company |
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
(in thousands, except number of shares) |
|
Investment(1)(2) |
|
Principal | |
|
Cost | |
|
Value | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Aspen Pet Products, Inc.
|
|
Loans (19.0%, Due 6/08) |
|
$ |
19,165 |
|
|
$ |
19,073 |
|
|
$ |
19,073 |
|
|
(Consumer Products)
|
|
Preferred Stock (2,763 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,154 |
|
|
|
917 |
|
|
|
Common Stock (1,400 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Becker Underwood, Inc.
|
|
Loan (14.5%, Due 8/12) |
|
|
23,197 |
|
|
|
23,090 |
|
|
|
23,090 |
|
|
(Industrial Products)
|
|
Common Stock (4,364 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
3,400 |
|
|
Border Foods, Inc.
|
|
Loan (13.0%, Due 12/10) |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
(Consumer Products)
|
|
Debt Securities (13.0%, Due 12/10) |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
9,525 |
|
|
|
9,525 |
|
|
|
Preferred Stock (50,919 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
982 |
|
|
|
Common Stock (1,810 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Debt Exchange Inc.
|
|
Preferred Stock (921,875 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
1,839 |
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MasterPlan, Inc.
|
|
Loan (12.0%, Due on demand) |
|
|
959 |
|
|
|
959 |
|
|
|
1,204 |
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
Common Stock (1,350 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
3,300 |
|
|
MedBridge Healthcare, LLC
|
|
Loan (5.1%, Due 8/09 8/14) |
|
|
11,447 |
|
|
|
11,447 |
|
|
|
11,447 |
|
|
(Healthcare Services)
|
|
Convertible Debenture (2.0%, Due 8/14)
(6) |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
1,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
MortgageRamp, Inc.
|
|
Common Stock (772,000 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,860 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nexcel Synthetics, LLC
|
|
Loan (14.5%, Due 6/09) |
|
|
10,340 |
|
|
|
10,305 |
|
|
|
10,305 |
|
|
(Consumer Products)
|
|
Equity Interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,690 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
Packaging Advantage Corporation
|
|
Debt Securities (18.5%, Due 4/08) |
|
|
15,439 |
|
|
|
14,731 |
|
|
|
14,731 |
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
Common Stock (232,168 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,386 |
|
|
|
1,384 |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
Pres Air Trol LLC
|
|
Debt Securities (12.0%, Due 4/10) |
|
|
6,307 |
|
|
|
5,988 |
|
|
|
5,988 |
|
|
(Industrial Products)
|
|
Equity Interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,323 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
Progressive International
|
|
Loan (16.0%, Due 12/09) |
|
|
7,290 |
|
|
|
7,260 |
|
|
|
7,260 |
|
|
Corporation
|
|
Preferred Stock (500 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
832 |
|
|
(Consumer Products)
|
|
Common Stock (197 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soteria Imaging Services, LLC
|
|
Loan (12.5%, Due 11/10) |
|
|
9,500 |
|
|
|
8,380 |
|
|
|
8,380 |
|
|
(Healthcare Services)
|
|
Equity Interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,114 |
|
|
|
2,114 |
|
|
Universal Environmental Services,
|
|
Loan (13.5%, Due 2/09) |
|
|
12,150 |
|
|
|
12,102 |
|
|
|
12,102 |
|
|
LLC
|
|
Equity Interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
1,633 |
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
companies 5% to 25% owned |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
196,842 |
|
|
$ |
187,459 |
|
|
Companies Less Than 5% Owned |
|
|
|
|
|
Anthony, Inc.
|
|
Loan (11.4%, Due 9/11 9/12) |
|
$ |
14,561 |
|
|
$ |
14,494 |
|
|
$ |
14,494 |
|
|
(Industrial Products)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Interest
rates represent the weighted average annual stated interest rate
on loans and debt securities, which are presented by nature of
indebtedness for a single issuer. The maturity dates represent
the earliest and the latest maturity dates. |
|
|
|
|
(2) Common
stock, preferred stock, warrants, options, and equity interests
are generally non-income producing and restricted. |
|
|
|
|
(3) Public
company. |
|
|
|
|
(4) Non-U.S. company
or principal place of business outside the U.S. |
|
|
|
|
(5) Non-registered
investment company. |
|
|
|
|
(6) Loan
or debt security is on non-accrual status and therefore is
considered non-income producing. |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Private Finance |
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company |
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
(in thousands, except number of shares) |
|
Investment(1)(2) |
|
Principal | |
|
Cost | |
|
Value | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Apogen Technologies, Inc.
|
|
Debt Securities (13.0%, Due 1/10) |
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,983 |
|
|
$ |
4,983 |
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
Preferred Stock (270,008 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,700 |
|
|
|
3,252 |
|
|
|
Common Stock (1,256,452 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
2,295 |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
Aviation Technologies, Inc.
|
|
Loan (17.0%, Due 5/11) |
|
|
21,341 |
|
|
|
21,264 |
|
|
|
21,264 |
|
|
(Industrial Products)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benchmark Medical, Inc.
|
|
Debt Securities (14.0%, Due 12/08) |
|
|
13,752 |
|
|
|
13,695 |
|
|
|
13,695 |
|
|
(Healthcare Services)
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
BI Incorporated
|
|
Loan (14.0%, due 2/12) |
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
15,921 |
|
|
|
15,921 |
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C&K Market, Inc.
|
|
Loan (13.0%, due 12/08) |
|
|
14,444 |
|
|
|
14,372 |
|
|
|
14,372 |
|
|
(Retail)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Callidus Debt Partners
|
|
Preferred Shares (23,600,000 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,392 |
|
|
|
24,392 |
|
|
CLO Fund III, LTD
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Senior Debt CLO Fund)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Camden Partners Strategic Fund II,
L.P.(5)
|
|
Limited Partnership Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,142 |
|
|
|
2,871 |
|
|
(Private Equity Fund)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Catterton Partners V,
L.P.(5)
|
|
Limited Partnership Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,340 |
|
|
|
2,109 |
|
|
(Private Equity Fund)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CBS Personnel Holdings, Inc.
|
|
Loan (15.5%, Due 12/09) |
|
|
20,181 |
|
|
|
20,090 |
|
|
|
20,090 |
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colibri Holding Corporation
|
|
Debt Securities (12.5%, Due 9/08) |
|
|
3,750 |
|
|
|
3,513 |
|
|
|
3,513 |
|
|
(Consumer Products)
|
|
Preferred Stock (459 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
826 |
|
|
|
Common Stock (3,362 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
Community Education
Centers, Inc.
|
|
Loan (15.0%, Due 12/10) |
|
|
23,813 |
|
|
|
23,718 |
|
|
|
23,718 |
|
|
(Education Services)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Component Hardware Group, Inc.
|
|
Preferred Stock (18,000 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,605 |
|
|
|
2,709 |
|
|
(Industrial Products)
|
|
Common Stock (2,000 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
Cooper Natural Resources, Inc.
|
|
Debt Securities (0%, Due 11/07) |
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
(Industrial Products)
|
|
Preferred Stock (6,316 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coverall North America, Inc.
|
|
Loan (14.6%, Due 2/11) |
|
|
26,899 |
|
|
|
26,844 |
|
|
|
26,844 |
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
Preferred Stock (6,500 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
6,561 |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,950 |
|
|
|
2,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Interest
rates represent the weighted average annual stated interest rate
on loans and debt securities, which are presented by nature of
indebtedness for a single issuer. The maturity dates represent
the earliest and the latest maturity dates. |
|
|
|
|
(2) Common
stock, preferred stock, warrants, options, and equity interests
are generally non-income producing and restricted. |
|
|
|
|
(3) Public
company. |
|
|
|
|
(4) Non-U.S. company
or principal place of business outside the U.S. |
|
|
|
|
(5) Non-registered
investment company. |
|
|
|
|
(6) Loan
or debt security is on non-accrual status and therefore is
considered non-income producing. |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Private Finance |
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company |
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
(in thousands, except number of shares) |
|
Investment(1)(2) |
|
Principal | |
|
Cost | |
|
Value | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
CTT Holdings
|
|
Loan (0%, Due
3/10)(6) |
|
$ |
1,125 |
|
|
$ |
1,125 |
|
|
$ |
563 |
|
|
(Consumer Products)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DCS Business Services, Inc.
|
|
Common Stock (478,816 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
734 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilltec Patents & Technologies
|
|
Loan (10.0%, Due
8/06)(6) |
|
|
10,994 |
|
|
|
10,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company, Inc.
|
|
Debt Securities (15.5%, Due
8/06)(6) |
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Energy Services)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
eCentury Capital Partners,
L.P.(5)
|
|
Limited Partnership Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,024 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
(Private Equity Fund)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EDM Consulting, LLC
|
|
Loan (5.8%, Due 12/06) |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elexis Beta
GmbH(4)
|
|
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
(Industrial Products)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E-Talk Corporation
|
|
Preferred Stock (133 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,009 |
|
|
|
1,468 |
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
Common Stock (8,656 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
Frozen Specialties, Inc.
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
(Consumer Products)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garden Ridge Corporation
(Retail)
|
|
Debt Securities (12.9%, Due 12/05
12/07)(6) |
|
|
27,271 |
|
|
|
27,271 |
|
|
|
12,722 |
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock (1,130 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (847,800 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geotrace Technologies, Inc.
|
|
Debt Securities (12.0%, Due 6/09) |
|
|
18,400 |
|
|
|
16,380 |
|
|
|
16,380 |
|
(Energy Services)
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,350 |
|
|
|
2,350 |
|
|
Ginsey Industries, Inc.
|
|
Loans (12.5%, Due 3/06) |
|
|
4,307 |
|
|
|
4,307 |
|
|
|
4,307 |
|
|
(Consumer Products)
|
|
Convertible Debentures (12.5%, Due 3/06) |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,103 |
|
|
Grant Broadcasting Systems II
|
|
Loan (5.0%, Due 6/09) |
|
|
2,756 |
|
|
|
2,756 |
|
|
|
2,756 |
|
|
(Broadcasting & Cable)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grotech Partners, VI,
L.P.(5)
|
|
Limited Partnership Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,329 |
|
|
|
4,115 |
|
|
(Private Equity Fund)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Haven Eldercare of New England, LLC
(8)
|
|
Loans (9.3%, Due 10/05) |
|
|
46,671 |
|
|
|
46,669 |
|
|
|
46,669 |
|
|
(Healthcare Services)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Haven Healthcare Management,
LLC(8)
|
|
Loan (18.0% Due 8/06) |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
(Healthcare Services)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Hillman Companies,
Inc.(3)
|
|
Loan (13.5%, Due 9/11) |
|
|
43,265 |
|
|
|
43,057 |
|
|
|
43,057 |
|
|
(Consumer Products)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Interest
rates represent the weighted average annual stated interest rate
on loans and debt securities, which are presented by nature of
indebtedness for a single issuer. The maturity dates represent
the earliest and the latest maturity dates. |
|
|
|
|
(2) Common
stock, preferred stock, warrants, options, and equity interests
are generally non-income producing and restricted. |
|
|
|
|
(3) Public
company. |
|
|
|
|
(4) Non-U.S. company
or principal place of business outside the U.S. |
|
|
|
|
(5) Non-registered
investment company. |
|
|
|
|
(6) Loan
or debt security is on non-accrual status and therefore is
considered non-income producing. |
|
|
|
|
(8) Haven
Eldercare of New England, LLC and Haven Healthcare Management,
LLC are affiliated companies. |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Private Finance |
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company |
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
(in thousands, except number of shares) |
|
Investment(1)(2) |
|
Principal | |
|
Cost | |
|
Value | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Homax Holdings, Inc.
|
|
Debt (12.0%, Due 8/11) |
|
$ |
14,000 |
|
|
$ |
12,958 |
|
|
$ |
12,958 |
|
|
(Consumer Products)
|
|
Preferred Stock (89 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
Common Stock (28 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
|
1,377 |
|
|
Icon International, Inc.
|
|
Common Stock (25,707 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interline Brands,
Inc.(3)
|
|
Common Stock (152,371 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,294 |
|
|
|
2,850 |
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International Fiber Corporation
|
|
Debt Securities (14.0%, Due 6/12) |
|
|
21,222 |
|
|
|
21,127 |
|
|
|
21,127 |
|
|
(Industrial Products)
|
|
Preferred Stock (25,000 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
MedAssets, Inc.
|
|
Preferred Stock (227,865 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,049 |
|
|
|
2,765 |
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
Mid-Atlantic Venture Fund IV, L.P.
(5)
|
|
Limited Partnership Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,600 |
|
|
|
3,012 |
|
|
(Private Equity Fund)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mogas Energy, LLC
(Energy Services)
|
|
Debt Securities (9.5%, Due 3/12 4/12) |
|
|
17,476 |
|
|
|
15,988 |
|
|
|
15,988 |
|
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,774 |
|
|
|
2,800 |
|
|
Nobel Learning Communities,
|
|
Preferred Stock (1,214,356 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,764 |
|
|
|
2,764 |
|
|
Inc.(3)
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
861 |
|
|
(Education)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Norwesco, Inc.
|
|
Loan (14.0%, Due 12/11) |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
14,928 |
|
|
|
14,928 |
|
|
(Industrial Products)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novak Biddle Venture Partners III,
L.P.(5)
|
|
Limited Partnership Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,189 |
|
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
(Private Equity Fund)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oahu Waste Services, Inc.
|
|
Stock Appreciation Rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Onyx Television GmbH
(4)
|
|
Preferred Units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Broadcasting & Cable)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opinion Research
Corporation(3)
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
996 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oriental Trading Company, Inc.
|
|
Common Stock (13,820 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,900 |
|
|
(Consumer Products)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Mach, Inc.
|
|
Loan (13.8%, Due 6/12) |
|
|
19,000 |
|
|
|
18,909 |
|
|
|
18,909 |
|
|
(Industrial Products)
|
|
Equity Interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
RadioVisa Corporation
|
|
Loan (15.5%, Due 12/08) |
|
|
26,189 |
|
|
|
26,080 |
|
|
|
26,080 |
|
|
(Broadcasting & Cable)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resun Leasing, Inc.
|
|
Loan (15.5%, Due 11/07) |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.B. Restaurant Company
|
|
Debt Securities (15.0%, Due 11/08) |
|
|
17,796 |
|
|
|
17,271 |
|
|
|
17,271 |
|
|
(Retail)
|
|
Preferred Stock (54,125 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
619 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Interest
rates represent the weighted average annual stated interest rate
on loans and debt securities, which are presented by nature of
indebtedness for a single issuer. The maturity dates represent
the earliest and the latest maturity dates. |
|
|
|
|
(2) Common
stock, preferred stock, warrants, options, and equity interests
are generally non-income producing and restricted. |
|
|
|
|
(3) Public
company. |
|
|
|
|
(4) Non-U.S. company
or principal place of business outside the U.S. |
|
|
|
|
(5) Non-registered
investment company. |
|
|
|
|
(6) Loan
or debt security is on non-accrual status and therefore is
considered non-income producing. |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Private Finance |
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Company |
|
|
|
(unaudited) | |
(in thousands, except number of shares) |
|
Investment(1)(2) |
|
Principal | |
|
Cost | |
|
Value | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
SBBUT, LLC
|
|
Equity Interests |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
(Consumer Products)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soff-Cut Holdings, Inc.
|
|
Preferred Stock (300 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Industrial Products)
|
|
Common Stock (2,000 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SPP Mezzanine Fund,
L.P.(5)
|
|
Limited Partnership Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,663 |
|
|
|
1,553 |
|
|
(Private Equity Fund)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SunStates Refrigerated Services,
|
|
Loan (8.3%, Due
1/05)(6) |
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Warehouse Facilities)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tradesmen International, Inc.
|
|
Debt Securities (12.0%, Due 12/09) |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
14,226 |
|
|
|
14,226 |
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
United Site Services, Inc.
|
|
Loan (12.7%, Due 6/10 12/10) |
|
|
53,918 |
|
|
|
53,649 |
|
|
|
53,649 |
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
Common Stock (160,588 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
Universal Tax Systems, Inc.
|
|
Loan (14.5%, Due 7/11) |
|
|
18,711 |
|
|
|
18,628 |
|
|
|
18,628 |
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Updata Venture Partners II,
L.P.(5)
|
|
Limited Partnership Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,375 |
|
|
|
4,233 |
|
|
(Private Equity Fund)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Venturehouse-Cibernet Investors, LLC
|
|
Equity Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Venturehouse Group,
LLC(5)
|
|
Equity Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
403 |
|
|
(Private Equity Fund)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VICORP Restaurants,
Inc.(3)
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
742 |
|
|
(Retail)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walker Investment Fund II,
LLLP(5)
|
|
Limited Partnership Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
|
728 |
|
|
(Private Equity Fund)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wear Me Apparel Corporation
|
|
Debt Securities (17.0%, Due 12/10) |
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
44,056 |
|
|
|
44,056 |
|
|
(Consumer Products)
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,219 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
Weston Solutions, Inc.
|
|
Loan (17.3%, Due 6/10) |
|
|
7,350 |
|
|
|
7,323 |
|
|
|
7,323 |
|
|
(Business Services)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wilshire Restaurant Group, Inc.
|
|
Debt Securities (20.0%, Due
6/07)(6) |
|
|
19,107 |
|
|
|
18,566 |
|
|
|
18,884 |
|
|
(Retail)
|
|
Warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
735 |
|
|
Wilton Industries, Inc.
|
|
Loan (19.3%, Due 6/08) |
|
|
7,200 |
|
|
|
7,200 |
|
|
|
7,200 |
|
|
(Consumer Products)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodstream Corporation
|
|
Loan (12.6%, Due 8/12 2/13) |
|
|
30,970 |
|
|
|
30,919 |
|
|
|
30,919 |
|
|
(Consumer Products)
|
|
Common Stock (180 shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
Other companies
|
|
Other investments |
|
|
862 |
|
|
|
870 |
|
|
|
864 |
|
|
|
Guaranty ($226) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
companies less than 5% owned |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
786,607 |
|
|
$ |
753,537 |
|
|
Total
private finance (116 portfolio companies) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,410,310 |
|
|
$ |
2,378,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Interest
rates represent the weighted average annual stated interest rate
on loans and debt securities, which are presented by nature of
indebtedness for a single issuer. The maturity dates represent
the earliest and the latest maturity dates. |
|
|
|
|
(2) Common
stock, preferred stock, warrants, options, and equity interests
are generally non-income producing and restricted. |
|
|
|
|
(3) Public
company. |
|
|
|
|
(4) Non-U.S. company
or principal place of business outside the U.S. |
|
|
|
|
(5) Non-registered
investment company. |
|
|
|
|
(6) Loan
or debt security is on non-accrual status and therefore is
considered non-income producing. |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Stated | |
|
|
|
|
Interest | |
|
Face (un | |
|
audited) | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Commercial Real Estate Finance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except number of issuances)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Capital Funding, Series 1998-MC3
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
$ |
51,105 |
|
|
$ |
35,925 |
|
|
$ |
31,436 |
|
|
Morgan Stanley Capital I, Series 1999-RM1
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
27,936 |
|
|
|
9,138 |
|
|
|
9,138 |
|
|
COMM 1999-1
|
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
50,032 |
|
|
|
28,525 |
|
|
|
27,677 |
|
|
Morgan Stanley Capital I, Series 1999-FNV1
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
20,168 |
|
|
|
10,060 |
|
|
|
7,575 |
|
|
DLJ Commercial Mortgage Trust 1999-CG2
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
39,165 |
|
|
|
13,333 |
|
|
|
14,176 |
|
|
Commercial Mortgage Acceptance Corp., Series 1999-C1
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
18,173 |
|
|
|
4,582 |
|
|
|
4,844 |
|
|
LB Commercial Mortgage Trust, Series 1999-C2
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
11,151 |
|
|
|
1,520 |
|
|
|
1,733 |
|
|
Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., Series 1999-2
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
20,576 |
|
|
|
5,027 |
|
|
|
9,254 |
|
|
FUNB CMT, Series 1999-C4
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
18,587 |
|
|
|
7,688 |
|
|
|
6,876 |
|
|
Heller Financial, HFCMC Series 2000 PH-1
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
23,536 |
|
|
|
8,440 |
|
|
|
8,500 |
|
|
SBMS VII, Inc., Series 2000-NL1
|
|
|
7.2 |
% |
|
|
7,924 |
|
|
|
4,323 |
|
|
|
3,464 |
|
|
DLJ Commercial Mortgage Trust, Series 2000-CF1
|
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
24,793 |
|
|
|
11,370 |
|
|
|
8,953 |
|
|
Deutsche Bank Alex. Brown, Series Comm 2000-C1
|
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
12,290 |
|
|
|
3,286 |
|
|
|
2,441 |
|
|
LB-UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust, Series 2000-C4
|
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
13,841 |
|
|
|
2,575 |
|
|
|
1,092 |
|
|
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp.,
Series 2001-CK1
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
16,861 |
|
|
|
4,123 |
|
|
|
5,074 |
|
|
JP Morgan-CIBC-Deutsche 2001
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
20,528 |
|
|
|
6,872 |
|
|
|
3,384 |
|
|
Lehman Brothers-UBS Warburg 2001-C2
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
22,203 |
|
|
|
6,426 |
|
|
|
8,977 |
|
|
SBMS VII, Inc., Series 2001-C1
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
10,637 |
|
|
|
2,148 |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
GE Capital Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.,
Series 2001-2
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
18,446 |
|
|
|
6,867 |
|
|
|
6,867 |
|
|
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp.,
Series 2001-CKN5
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
16,881 |
|
|
|
5,098 |
|
|
|
3,486 |
|
|
JP Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.,
Series 2001-C1
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
21,141 |
|
|
|
5,791 |
|
|
|
5,791 |
|
|
SBMS VII, Inc., Series 2001-C2
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
21,735 |
|
|
|
5,703 |
|
|
|
5,703 |
|
|
FUNB CMT, Series 2002-C1
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
17,181 |
|
|
|
7,305 |
|
|
|
6,517 |
|
|
GE Capital Commercial Mortgage Corp., Series 2002-1
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
25,965 |
|
|
|
7,127 |
|
|
|
8,393 |
|
|
GMAC Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., Series 2002-C2
|
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
23,053 |
|
|
|
7,614 |
|
|
|
7,614 |
|
|
GE Capital Commercial Mortgage Corp., Series 2002-3
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
27,796 |
|
|
|
6,298 |
|
|
|
6,298 |
|
|
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Capital I Trust 2002-IQ3
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
12,508 |
|
|
|
1,775 |
|
|
|
1,775 |
|
|
LB-UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2003-C1
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
23,999 |
|
|
|
3,944 |
|
|
|
3,944 |
|
|
GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II Series 2003-C1
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
20,147 |
|
|
|
5,592 |
|
|
|
5,592 |
|
|
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp.,
Series 2003-CK2
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
32,170 |
|
|
|
12,502 |
|
|
|
12,862 |
|
|
COMM 2003-LNB1
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
20,094 |
|
|
|
3,216 |
|
|
|
3,216 |
|
|
Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, Series 2003-C5
|
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
34,527 |
|
|
|
8,098 |
|
|
|
8,098 |
|
|
GMAC Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., Series 2003-C2
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
30,654 |
|
|
|
6,670 |
|
|
|
6,670 |
|
|
Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, Series 2003-C9
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
28,737 |
|
|
|
8,981 |
|
|
|
8,981 |
|
|
GE Commercial Mortgage Corporation, Series 2004-C1
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
27,083 |
|
|
|
7,168 |
|
|
|
7,168 |
|
|
LB-UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2004-C1
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
21,365 |
|
|
|
5,832 |
|
|
|
5,832 |
|
|
MezzCapp Commercial Mortgage Trust, Series 2004-C1
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
1,990 |
|
|
|
813 |
|
|
|
813 |
|
|
COMM 2004-LNB3
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
26,708 |
|
|
|
9,670 |
|
|
|
9,670 |
|
|
GMAC Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. Series 2004-C1
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
23,035 |
|
|
|
10,608 |
|
|
|
10,507 |
|
|
GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, Series 2004-C1
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
20,076 |
|
|
|
8,294 |
|
|
|
8,294 |
|
|
J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.,
Series 2004-LN2
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
29,590 |
|
|
|
9,345 |
|
|
|
9,345 |
|
|
Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, Series 2004-C14
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
21,947 |
|
|
|
5,299 |
|
|
|
5,299 |
|
|
COMM 2004-LNB4
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
43,033 |
|
|
|
20,963 |
|
|
|
21,168 |
|
|
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Security Corp., Series
2004-C5
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
12,125 |
|
|
|
9,491 |
|
|
|
9,411 |
|
|
ACGS, 2004-1
|
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
9,292 |
|
|
|
9,224 |
|
|
|
9,086 |
|
|
ACGS, 2004-1, LLC Interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,700 |
|
|
|
17,188 |
|
|
|
17,188 |
|
|
GE Capital Commercial Mortgage Corp., Series 2005-C1
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
11,279 |
|
|
|
8,758 |
|
|
|
8,789 |
|
|
LB-UBS Commercial Mortgage Trust, Series 2005-C1
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
50,737 |
|
|
|
28,368 |
|
|
|
28,243 |
|
|
Wachovia Bank Commercial Mortgage Trust, Series 2005-C17
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
98,520 |
|
|
|
56,564 |
|
|
|
57,270 |
|
|
|
|
Total commercial mortgage-backed securities (48 issuances)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,203,020 |
|
|
$ |
475,527 |
|
|
$ |
466,060 |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
Cost | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Commercial Real Estate Finance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except number of loans)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized Debt Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crest 2001-1,
Ltd.(4)
|
|
$ |
21,853 |
|
|
$ |
23,190 |
|
|
Crest 2002-1,
Ltd.(4)
|
|
|
24,807 |
|
|
|
28,076 |
|
|
Crest 2002-IG,
Ltd.(4)
|
|
|
3,997 |
|
|
|
4,949 |
|
|
Crest Clarendon Street 2002-1,
Ltd.(4)
|
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
1,053 |
|
|
Crest 2003-1,
Ltd.(4)
|
|
|
94,731 |
|
|
|
101,171 |
|
|
Crest 2003-2,
Ltd.(4)
|
|
|
26,560 |
|
|
|
27,894 |
|
|
TIAA Real Estate CDO 2003-1,
Ltd.(4)
|
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
Crest Exeter Street Solar 2004-1,
Ltd.(4)
|
|
|
1,636 |
|
|
|
1,770 |
|
|
Fairfield Street Solar 2004-1,
Ltd.(4)
|
|
|
5,957 |
|
|
|
5,964 |
|
|
Crest 2004-1,
Ltd.(4)
|
|
|
32,096 |
|
|
|
32,035 |
|
|
|
|
Total
collateralized debt obligations (10 issuances)
|
|
$ |
213,488 |
|
|
$ |
227,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest | |
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate Ranges | |
|
Loans | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Commercial Mortgage Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Up to 6.99% |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
$ |
27,555 |
|
|
$ |
25,663 |
|
|
|
|
7.00%8.99% |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
31,035 |
|
|
|
30,590 |
|
|
|
|
9.00%10.99% |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
19,093 |
|
|
|
18,784 |
|
|
|
|
11.00%12.99% |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
8,497 |
|
|
|
8,054 |
|
|
|
|
13.00%14.99% |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2,617 |
|
|
|
2,617 |
|
|
|
15.00% and above |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3,970 |
|
|
|
3,970 |
|
|
|
|
Total commercial mortgage
loans(9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
$ |
92,767 |
|
|
$ |
89,678 |
|
|
Real Estate Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
15,369 |
|
|
$ |
18,443 |
|
|
Equity
Interests(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companies more than 25% owned (Guarantees $2,681) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,462 |
|
|
$ |
12,655 |
|
|
Companies less than 5% owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,548 |
|
|
|
|
Total equity interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,462 |
|
|
$ |
15,203 |
|
|
|
|
Total commercial real estate finance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
809,613 |
|
|
$ |
816,536 |
|
|
Total portfolio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,219,923 |
|
|
$ |
3,195,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Interest
rates represent the weighted average annual stated interest rate
on loans and debt securities, which are presented by nature of
indebtedness for a single issuer. The maturity dates represent
the earliest and the latest maturity dates. |
(2) Common
stock, preferred stock, warrants, options, and equity interests
are generally non-income producing and restricted. |
(3) Public
company. |
(4) Non-U.S. company
or principal place of business outside the U.S. |
(5) Non-registered
investment company. |
(9) Commercial
mortgage loans totaling $22.9 million were on non-accrual
status and therefore were considered non-income producing. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
14
ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Information at and for the three months ended March 31,
2005 and 2004 is unaudited)
Note 1. Organization
Allied Capital Corporation, a Maryland corporation, is a
closed-end management investment company that has elected to be
regulated as a business development company (BDC)
under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (1940 Act).
Allied Capital Corporation (ACC) has a subsidiary
that has also elected to be regulated as a BDC, Allied
Investment Corporation (Allied Investment), which is
licensed under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 as a
Small Business Investment Company (SBIC). In
addition, ACC has a real estate investment trust subsidiary,
Allied Capital REIT, Inc. (Allied REIT), and several
subsidiaries which are single member limited liability companies
established primarily to hold real estate properties. ACC also
has a subsidiary, A.C. Corporation (AC Corp), that
provides diligence and structuring services on private finance
and commercial real estate finance transactions, as well as
structuring, transaction, management, and advisory services to
the Company, its portfolio companies and other third parties.
Allied Capital Corporation and its subsidiaries, collectively,
are referred to as the Company.
In accordance with specific rules prescribed for investment
companies, subsidiaries hold investments on behalf of the
Company or provide substantial services to the Company.
Portfolio investments are held for purposes of deriving
investment income and future capital gains. The Company
consolidates the results of its subsidiaries for financial
reporting purposes. The financial results of the Companys
portfolio investments are not consolidated in the Companys
financial statements.
The investment objective of the Company is to achieve current
income and capital gains. In order to achieve this objective,
the Company has invested in companies in a variety of
industries, non-investment grade commercial mortgage-backed
securities (CMBS) and collateralized debt obligation
bonds and preferred shares (CDOs).
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
ACC and its subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain
reclassifications have been made to the 2004 balances to conform
with the 2005 financial statement presentation.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of
the Company have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim
financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of
the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete
consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management,
the unaudited consolidated financial results of the Company
included herein contain all adjustments (consisting of only
normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the
financial position of the Company as of March 31, 2005, and
the results of operations, changes in net assets, and cash flows
for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. The
results of operations for the three months ended March 31,
2005, are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to
be expected for the full year.
15
ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,
continued
The private finance portfolio and the interest and related
portfolio income and net realized gains (losses) on the private
finance portfolio are presented in three categories: companies
more than 25% owned, which represent portfolio companies where
the Company directly or indirectly owns more than 25% of the
outstanding voting securities of such portfolio company and,
therefore, are deemed controlled by the Company under the 1940
Act; companies owned 5% to 25%, which represent portfolio
companies where the Company directly or indirectly owns 5% to
25% of the outstanding voting securities of such portfolio
company or where the Company holds one or more seats on the
portfolio companys board of directors and, therefore, are
deemed to be an affiliated person under the 1940 Act; and
companies less than 5% owned which represent portfolio companies
where the Company directly or indirectly owns less than 5% of
the outstanding voting securities of such portfolio company and
where the Company has no other affiliations with such portfolio
company. The interest and related portfolio income and net
realized gains (losses) from the commercial real estate finance
portfolio and other sources are included in the companies less
than 5% owned category on the consolidated statement of
operations.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into
transactions with portfolio companies in the more than 25% owned
and the 5% to 25% owned categories that may be considered
related party transactions.
|
|
|
Valuation Of Portfolio Investments |
The Company, as a BDC, has invested in illiquid securities
including debt and equity securities of companies,
non-investment grade CMBS, and the bonds and preferred shares of
CDOs. The Companys investments are generally subject to
restrictions on resale and generally have no established trading
market. The Company values substantially all of its investments
at fair value as determined in good faith by the Board of
Directors in accordance with the Companys valuation
policy. The Company determines fair value to be the amount for
which an investment could be exchanged in an orderly disposition
over a reasonable period of time between willing parties other
than in a forced or liquidation sale. The Companys
valuation policy considers the fact that no ready market exists
for substantially all of the securities in which it invests. The
Companys valuation policy is intended to provide a
consistent basis for determining the fair value of the
portfolio. The Company will record unrealized depreciation on
investments when it believes that an investment has become
impaired, including where collection of a loan or realization of
an equity security is doubtful, or when the enterprise value of
the portfolio company does not currently support the cost of the
Companys debt or equity investments. Enterprise value
means the entire value of the company to a potential buyer,
including the sum of the values of debt and equity securities
used to capitalize the enterprise at a point in time. The
Company will record unrealized appreciation if it believes that
the underlying portfolio company has appreciated in value and
the Companys equity security has also appreciated in
value. The value of investments in publicly traded securities is
determined using quoted market prices discounted for
restrictions on resale, if any.
|
|
|
Loans and Debt Securities |
For loans and debt securities, fair value generally approximates
cost unless the borrowers enterprise value, overall
financial condition or other factors lead to a determination of
fair value at a different amount.
16
ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,
continued
When the Company receives nominal cost warrants or free equity
securities (nominal cost equity), the Company
allocates its cost basis in its investment between its debt
securities and its nominal cost equity at the time of
origination. At that time, the original issue discount basis of
the nominal cost equity is recorded by increasing the cost basis
in the equity and decreasing the cost basis in the related debt
securities.
Interest income is recorded on an accrual basis to the extent
that such amounts are expected to be collected. For loans and
debt securities with contractual payment-in-kind interest, which
represents contractual interest accrued and added to the loan
balance that generally becomes due at maturity, the Company will
not accrue payment-in-kind interest if the portfolio company
valuation indicates that the payment-in-kind interest is not
collectible. Interest on loans and debt securities is not
accrued if the Company has doubt about interest collection.
Loans in workout status that are classified as Grade 4 or 5
assets under the Companys internal grading system do not
accrue interest. In addition, interest may not accrue on loans
or debt securities to portfolio companies that are more than 50%
owned by the Company depending on such companys capital
requirements. Loan origination fees, original issue discount,
and market discount are capitalized and then amortized into
interest income using the effective interest method. Upon the
prepayment of a loan or debt security, any unamortized loan
origination fees are recorded as interest income and any
unamortized original issue discount or market discount is
recorded as a realized gain. Prepayment premiums are recorded on
loans and debt securities when received.
The weighted average yield on loans and debt securities is
computed as the (a) annual stated interest rate plus the
annual amortization of loan origination fees, original issue
discount, and market discount on accruing loans and debt
securities less the annual amortization of loan origination
costs, divided by (b) total loans and debt securities at
value. The weighted average yield is computed as of the balance
sheet date.
The Companys equity interests in portfolio companies for
which there is no liquid public market are valued at fair value
based on the enterprise value of the portfolio company, which is
determined using various factors, including cash flow from
operations of the portfolio company and other pertinent factors,
such as recent offers to purchase a portfolio company, recent
transactions involving the purchase or sale of the portfolio
companys equity securities, or other liquidation events.
The determined equity values are generally discounted to account
for restrictions on resale or minority ownership positions.
The value of the Companys equity interests in public
companies for which market quotations are readily available is
based on the closing public market price on the balance sheet
date. Securities that carry certain restrictions on sale are
typically valued at a discount from the public market value of
the security.
Dividend income is recorded on preferred equity securities on an
accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be
collected, and on common equity securities on the record date
for private companies or on the ex-dividend date for publicly
traded companies.
17
ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,
continued
|
|
|
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities (CMBS)
and Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDO) |
CMBS bonds and CDO bonds and preferred shares are carried at
fair value, which is based on a discounted cash flow model that
utilizes prepayment and loss assumptions based on historical
experience and projected performance, economic factors, the
characteristics of the underlying cash flow, and comparable
yields for similar CMBS bonds and CDO bonds and preferred
shares, when available. The Company recognizes unrealized
appreciation or depreciation on its CMBS bonds and CDO bonds and
preferred shares as comparable yields in the market change
and/or based on changes in estimated cash flows resulting from
changes in prepayment or loss assumptions in the underlying
collateral pool. The Company has determined the fair value of
its CMBS bonds and CDO bonds and preferred shares on an
individual security-by-security basis. If the Company was to
sell a group of these investments in a pool in one or more
transactions, the total value received for that pool may be
different than the sum of the fair values of the individual
bonds or preferred shares.
The Company recognizes income from the amortization of original
issue discount using the effective interest method, using the
anticipated yield over the projected life of the investment.
Yields are revised when there are changes in actual and
estimated prepayment speeds or actual and estimated credit
losses. Changes in estimated yield are recognized as an
adjustment to the estimated yield over the remaining life of the
CMBS bonds and CDO bonds and preferred shares from the date the
estimated yield is changed.
|
|
|
Net Realized Gains or Losses and Net Change in Unrealized
Appreciation or Depreciation |
Realized gains or losses are measured by the difference between
the net proceeds from the repayment or sale and the cost basis
of the investment without regard to unrealized appreciation or
depreciation previously recognized, and include investments
charged off during the year, net of recoveries. Net change in
unrealized appreciation or depreciation reflects the change in
portfolio investment values during the reporting period,
including the reversal of previously recorded unrealized
appreciation or depreciation when gains or losses are realized.
Fee income includes fees for guarantees and services rendered by
the Company to portfolio companies and other third parties such
as diligence, structuring, transaction services, management
services, and other advisory services. Guaranty fees are
recognized as income over the related period of the guaranty.
Diligence, structuring, and transaction services fees are
generally recognized as income when services are rendered or
when the related transactions are completed. Management and
other advisory services fees are generally recognized as income
as the services are rendered.
The Company accounts for guarantees under FASB Interpretation
No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure
Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of
Indebtedness of Others (the Interpretation). In
accordance with the Interpretation, guarantees meeting the
characteristics described in the Interpretation, and issued or
modified after December 31, 2002, are
18
ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,
continued
recognized at fair value at inception. However, certain
guarantees are excluded from the initial recognition provisions
of the Interpretation. See Note 5 for disclosures related
to the Companys guarantees.
Debt financing costs are based on actual costs incurred in
obtaining debt financing and are deferred and amortized as part
of interest expense over the term of the related debt
instrument. Costs associated with the issuance of common stock,
such as underwriting, accounting and legal fees, and printing
costs are recorded as a reduction to the proceeds from the sale
of common stock.
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
Cash and cash equivalents include cash in banks and all highly
liquid investments with original maturities of three months or
less.
|
|
|
Dividends to Shareholders |
Dividends to shareholders are recorded on the record date.
The Company has a stock-based employee compensation plan. The
Company accounts for this plan under the recognition and
measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations.
No stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in net
increase in net assets resulting from operations, as all options
granted under this plan had an exercise price equal to the
market value of the underlying common stock on the date of
grant. The following table illustrates the effect on net
increase in net assets resulting from operations and earnings
per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition
provisions of FASB
19
ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,
continued
Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, to stock-based employee compensation for the
three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three | |
|
|
Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
| |
|
| |
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations as reported
|
|
$ |
119,621 |
|
|
$ |
20,308 |
|
Less total stock-based employee compensation expense determined
under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax
effects
|
|
|
(2,856 |
) |
|
|
(3,052 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
|
116,765 |
|
|
|
17,256 |
|
Less preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income available to common shareholders
|
|
$ |
116,765 |
|
|
$ |
17,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$ |
0.90 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
Pro forma expenses are based on the underlying value of the
options granted by the Company. The fair value of each option
grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model and expensed over the vesting period. The
following weighted average assumptions were used to calculate
the fair value of options granted during the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three | |
|
|
Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005(1) | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
Expected life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
37.0 |
% |
Dividend yield
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
8.7 |
% |
Weighted average fair value per option
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4.25 |
|
|
|
(1) |
The Company did not grant any options during the three months
ended March 31, 2005. |
|
|
|
Federal and State Income Taxes |
The Company intends to comply with the requirements of the
Internal Revenue Code (Code) that are applicable to
regulated investment companies (RIC) and real estate
investment trusts (REIT). The Company and its
subsidiaries that qualify as a RIC or a REIT intend to
distribute or retain through a deemed distribution all of their
annual taxable income to shareholders; therefore, the Company
has made no provision for income taxes for these entities. AC
Corp is a corporation subject to federal and state income taxes
and records a benefit or expense for income taxes as appropriate.
20
ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,
continued
Basic earnings per common share is calculated using the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding for the period
presented. Diluted earnings per common share reflects the
potential dilution that could occur if options to issue common
stock were exercised into common stock. Earnings per share is
computed after subtracting dividends on preferred shares.
|
|
|
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial
Statements |
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
The consolidated financial statements include portfolio
investments at value of $3.2 billion and $3.0 billion
at March 31, 2005, and December 31, 2004,
respectively. At March 31, 2005, and December 31,
2004, 91% and 92%, respectively, of the Companys total
assets represented portfolio investments whose fair values have
been determined by the Board of Directors in good faith in the
absence of readily available market values. Because of the
inherent uncertainty of valuation, the Board of Directors
determined values may differ significantly from the values that
would have been used had a ready market existed for the
investments, and the differences could be material.
|
|
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 123
(Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (the
Statement), which requires companies to recognize
the grant-date fair value of stock options and other
equity-based compensation issued to employees in the income
statement. The Statement expresses no preference for a type of
valuation model and was originally effective for most public
companies interim or annual periods beginning after
June 15, 2005. In April 2005, the Securities and Exchange
Commission issued a rule deferring the effective date to
January 1, 2006, for most companies. The scope of the
Statement includes a wide range of share-based compensation
arrangements including share options, restricted share plans,
performance-based awards, share appreciation rights, and
employee share purchase plans. The Statement replaces FASB
Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. The Company is
currently evaluating the effects of the Statement on its
financial position and results of operations with respect to the
selection of a valuation model. See the Companys current
disclosure under APB Opinion No. 25 above.
21
ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Note 3. Portfolio
At March 31, 2005, and December 31, 2004, the private
finance portfolio consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Cost | |
|
Value | |
|
Yield(1) | |
|
Cost | |
|
Value | |
|
Yield(1) | |
($ in thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Loans and debt securities
(2)
|
|
$ |
1,653,393 |
|
|
$ |
1,556,359 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
% |
|
$ |
1,679,855 |
|
|
$ |
1,602,869 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
% |
Equity interests
|
|
|
756,917 |
|
|
|
822,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
705,065 |
|
|
|
699,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
2,410,310 |
|
|
$ |
2,378,470 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,384,920 |
|
|
$ |
2,302,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The weighted average yield on loans and debt securities is
computed as the (a) annual stated interest plus the annual
amortization of loan origination fees, original issue discount,
and market discount on accruing loans and debt securities less
the annual amortization of loan origination costs, divided by
(b) total loans and debt securities at value. At
March 31, 2005, and December 31, 2004, the cost and
value of loans and debt securities include the Class A
equity interests in BLX and the guaranteed dividend yield on
these equity interests is included in interest income. The
weighted average yield is computed as of the balance sheet date. |
|
(2) |
The principal balance outstanding on loans and debt securities
was $1.7 billion and $1.7 billion at March 31,
2005, and December 31, 2004, respectively. The difference
between principal and cost is represented by unamortized loan
origination fees and costs, original issue discounts, and market
discounts totaling $27.2 million and $29.8 million at
March 31, 2005, and December 31, 2004, respectively. |
The Companys private finance investment activity
principally involves providing financing through privately
negotiated long-term debt and equity investments. The
Companys private finance investments are generally issued
by private companies and are generally illiquid and subject to
restrictions on resale. Private finance investments are
generally structured as loans and debt securities that carry a
relatively high fixed rate of interest, which may be combined
with equity features, such as conversion privileges, or warrants
or options to purchase a portion of the portfolio companys
equity at a pre-determined strike price, which is generally a
nominal price for warrants or options in a private company. The
annual stated interest rate is only one factor in pricing the
investment relative to the Companys rights and priority in
the portfolio companys capital structure, and will vary
depending on many factors, including if the Company has received
nominal cost equity or other components of investment return,
such as loan origination fees or market discount. The stated
interest rate may include some component of contractual
payment-in-kind interest, which represents contractual interest
accrued and added to the loan balance that generally becomes due
at maturity. At March 31, 2005, and December 31, 2004,
approximately 92% and 94%, respectively, of the Companys
loans and debt securities had fixed interest rates.
Loans and debt securities generally have a maturity of five to
ten years, with interest-only payments in the early years and
payments of both principal and interest in the later years,
although debt maturities and principal amortization schedules
vary.
Equity interests consist primarily of securities issued by
private companies and may be subject to restrictions on their
resale and are generally illiquid. The Company may incur closing
costs associated with making control investments, which will be
added to the cost basis of the Companys equity investment.
Equity securities generally do not produce a current return, but
are held with the potential for investment appreciation and
ultimate gain on sale.
22
ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Note 3. Portfolio, continued
The Companys largest investments at March 31, 2005,
and December 31, 2004, were in Advantage Sales &
Marketing, Inc. and Business Loan Express, LLC.
In June 2004, the Company completed the purchase of a
majority ownership in Advantage Sales & Marketing, Inc.
(Advantage). The Companys investment totaled
$260.3 million at cost and $353.4 million at value at
March 31, 2005, and $258.7 million at cost and
$283.0 million at value at December 31, 2004.
Advantage is a leading sales and marketing agency providing
outsourced sales, merchandising, and marketing services to the
consumer packaged goods industry. Advantage has offices across
the United States and is headquartered in Irvine, CA.
Total interest and related portfolio income earned from the
Companys investment in Advantage for the three months
ended March 31, 2005, was $9.2 million, which includes
interest income of $7.7 million and fees and other income
of $1.5 million. Net change in unrealized appreciation or
depreciation for the three months ended March 31, 2005,
includes $68.9 million of unrealized appreciation related
to Advantage.
The Companys investment in Business Loan Express, LLC
(BLX) totaled $282.2 million at cost and
$330.7 million at value at March 31, 2005, and
$280.4 million at cost and $335.2 million at value at
December 31, 2004. BLX is a small business lender that
participates in the U.S. Small Business
Administrations 7(a) Guaranteed Loan Program. At
March 31, 2005, and December 31, 2004, the
Company owned 94.9% of the voting Class C equity interests.
BLX has an equity appreciation rights plan for management which
will dilute the value available to the Class C equity
interest holders. BLX is headquartered in New York, NY.
Total interest and related portfolio income earned from the
Companys investment in BLX for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004, was $7.8 million and
$11.1 million, respectively, which included interest income
on the subordinated debt and Class A equity interests of
$3.4 million and $5.6 million, respectively, dividend
income on Class B interests of $2.0 million and
$2.0 million, respectively, and fees and other income of
$2.4 million and $3.5 million, respectively. Interest
and dividend income from BLX for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004, included interest and dividend
income of $1.6 million and $2.6 million, respectively,
which was paid in kind. The interest and dividends paid in kind
were paid to the Company through the issuance of additional debt
or equity interests.
Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation for the
three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, included a net
decrease in unrealized appreciation of $6.3 million and
$9.3 million, respectively, on the Companys
investment in BLX.
At December 31, 2004, the Companys subordinated debt
investment in BLX was $44.6 million at cost and value.
Effective January 1, 2005, this debt plus accrued interest
of $0.2 million was exchanged for Class B equity
interests, which are included in private finance equity
interests. Since the subordinated debt is no longer outstanding,
the amount of taxable income available to flow through to
BLXs equity holders will increase by the amount of
interest that would have otherwise been paid on this debt.
The Company has provided BLX with a $20 million revolving credit
facility for working capital. At March 31, 2005, and
December 31, 2004, there were no amounts outstanding under
this facility.
23
ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Note 3. Portfolio, continued
As a limited liability company, BLXs taxable income flows
through directly to its members. BLXs annual taxable
income generally differs from its book income for the fiscal
year due to temporary and permanent differences in the
recognition of income and expenses. The Company holds all of
BLXs Class A and Class B interests, and 94.9% of
the Class C interests. BLXs taxable income is first
allocated to the Class A interests to the extent that
dividends are paid in cash or in kind on such interests, with
the remainder being allocated to the Class B and
Class C interests. BLX declares dividends on its
Class B interests based on an estimate of its annual
taxable income allocable to such interests.
At the time of the corporate reorganization of BLX, Inc. from a
C corporation to a limited liability company in 2003, for
tax purposes BLX had a built-in gain representing
the aggregate fair market value of its assets in excess of the
tax basis of its assets. As a RIC, the Company will be subject
to special built-in gain rules on the assets of BLX. Under these
rules, taxes will be payable by the Company at the time and to
the extent that the built-in gains on BLXs assets at the
date of reorganization are recognized in a taxable disposition
of such assets in the 10-year period following the date of the
reorganization. At such time, the built-in gains realized upon
the disposition of these assets will be included in the
Companys taxable income, net of the corporate level taxes
paid by the Company on the built-in gains. However, if these
assets are disposed of after the 10-year period, there will be
no corporate level taxes on these built-in gains.
While the Company has no obligation to pay the built-in gains
tax until these assets are disposed of in the future, it may be
necessary to record a liability for these taxes in the future
should the Company intend to sell the assets of BLX within the
10-year period. The Company estimates that its future tax
liability resulting from the built-in gains at the date of
BLXs reorganization may total up to $40 million. At
March 31, 2005, and December 31, 2004, the Company
considered the increase in fair value of its investment in BLX
due to BLXs tax attributes as an LLC and has also
considered the reduction in fair value of its investment due to
these estimated built-in gain taxes in determining the fair
value of its investment in BLX.
As the controlling equity owner of BLX, the Company has provided
an unconditional guaranty to the BLX credit facility lenders in
an amount equal to 50% of the total obligations (consisting of
principal, letters of credit issued under the facility, accrued
interest, and other fees) on BLXs three-year
$275.0 million revolving credit facility, which includes a
sub-facility for the issuance of letters of credit for up to a
total of $50.0 million. The facility matures in
January 2007. The amount guaranteed by the Company at
March 31, 2005, was $104.6 million. This guaranty can
be called by the lenders only in the event of a default by BLX.
BLX was in compliance with the terms of its credit facility at
March 31, 2005. At March 31, 2005, the Company had
also provided four standby letters of credit totaling
$35.6 million in connection with four term securitization
transactions completed by BLX. In consideration for providing
the guaranty and the standby letters of credit, BLX paid the
Company fees of $1.6 million and $1.3 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Other activities (at cost) in portfolio companies more than 25%
owned excluding changes in unrealized appreciation or
depreciation during the three months ended March 31, 2005,
included:
|
|
|
|
|
a partial repayment of $8.2 million of the Companys
investment in Avborne, Inc. (Avborne) as a result of the sale of
Avbornes assets during the first quarter of 2005; |
24
ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Note 3. Portfolio, continued
|
|
|
|
|
additional fundings of $41.8 million on Callidus Capital
Corporations revolving line of credit related to its
middle market underwriting and syndication facility. Callidus
repaid borrowings under this facility totaling
$27.9 million during the quarter, for net additional
borrowings under the facility during the quarter of
$13.9 million; |
|
|
|
|
|
the contribution of existing debt securities of GAC Investments,
Inc. with a cost basis of $11.0 million to capital,
resulting in an increase in the Companys common stock cost
basis; |
|
|
|
an additional loan of $2.0 million to Gordian Group, Inc.; |
|
|
|
an additional $9.5 million debt and equity investment in
Mercury Air Centers, Inc. to finance its acquisition of
Corporate Wings; |
|
|
|
additional fundings of $5.8 million on Powell Plant Farms,
Inc.s revolving credit facility for working capital; |
|
|
|
the repayment of the Companys debt investment of
$14.0 million in Redox Brands, Inc.; and |
|
|
|
an additional debt investment of $8.4 million in STS
Operating, Inc. (STS) to support the recapitalization of
STS. In connection, with the recapitalization, STS redeemed the
Companys preferred stock investment. |
In addition, the Company appointed three members to Norstan
Apparel Shop Inc.s (Norstan) board of directors and now
has control of the board, therefore, Norstan is now included in
the portfolio companies more than 25% owned category.
On March 31, 2004, the Company sold its control investment
in Hillman, which was one of the Companys largest
investments, for a total transaction value of $510 million,
including the repayment of outstanding debt and adding the value
of Hillmans outstanding trust preferred shares. The
Company was repaid its existing $44.6 million in
outstanding debt. Total consideration to the Company from the
sale at closing, including the repayment of debt, was
$244.3 million, which included net cash proceeds of
$196.8 million and the receipt of a new subordinated debt
instrument of $47.5 million. During the second quarter of
2004, the Company sold a $5.0 million participation in its
subordinated debt in Hillman to a third party, which reduced the
Companys investment, and no gain or loss resulted from the
transaction. For the three months ended March 31, 2004, the
Company realized a gain of $149.0 million on the
transaction. For the year ended December 31, 2004, the
Company realized a gain of $150.3 million on the
transaction.
25
ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Note 3. Portfolio, continued
At March 31, 2005, and December 31, 2004, loans and
debt securities at value not accruing interest were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
($ in thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
Loans and debt securities in workout status (classified as
Grade 4 or 5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companies more than 25% owned
|
|
$ |
26,200 |
|
|
$ |
34,374 |
|
|
Companies less than 5% owned
|
|
|
13,309 |
|
|
|
16,550 |
|
Loans and debt securities not in workout status
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companies more than 25% owned
|
|
|
12,927 |
|
|
|
29,368 |
|
|
Companies 5% to 25% owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
678 |
|
|
Companies less than 5% owned
|
|
|
18,885 |
|
|
|
15,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
71,321 |
|
|
$ |
96,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The industry and geographic compositions of the private finance
portfolio at value at March 31, 2005, and December 31,
2004, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Industry
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business services
|
|
|
34 |
% |
|
|
32 |
% |
Financial services
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Consumer products
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Healthcare services
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Industrial products
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Retail
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Energy services
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Broadcasting and cable
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Other
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geographic
Region(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mid-Atlantic
|
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
West
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Midwest
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Southeast
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Northeast
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The geographic region for the private finance portfolio depicts the
location of the headquarters for the Companys portfolio
companies. The portfolio companies may have a number of other
locations.
|
26
ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Note 3. Portfolio, continued
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate Finance |
At March 31, 2005, and December 31, 2004, the
commercial real estate finance portfolio consisted of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Cost | |
|
Value | |
|
Yield(1) | |
|
Cost | |
|
Value | |
|
Yield(1) | |
($ in thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
CMBS bonds
|
|
$ |
475,527 |
|
|
$ |
466,060 |
|
|
|
13.0% |
|
|
$ |
383,310 |
|
|
$ |
373,805 |
|
|
|
14.6% |
|
CDO bonds and preferred shares
|
|
|
213,488 |
|
|
|
227,152 |
|
|
|
15.8% |
|
|
|
212,590 |
|
|
|
212,573 |
|
|
|
16.8% |
|
Commercial mortgage loans
|
|
|
92,767 |
|
|
|
89,678 |
|
|
|
6.4% |
|
|
|
99,373 |
|
|
|
95,056 |
|
|
|
6.8% |
|
Real estate owned
|
|
|
15,369 |
|
|
|
18,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,170 |
|
|
|
16,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity interests
|
|
|
12,462 |
|
|
|
15,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,169 |
|
|
|
13,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
809,613 |
|
|
$ |
816,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
722,612 |
|
|
$ |
711,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The weighted average yield on the interest-bearing investments
is computed as the (a) annual stated interest plus the
annual amortization of loan origination fees, original issue
discount, and market discount on accruing interest-bearing
investments less the annual amortization of origination costs,
divided by (b) total interest-bearing investments at value.
The weighted average yield is computed as of the balance sheet
date. Interest-bearing investments for the commercial real
estate finance portfolio include all investments except for real
estate owned and equity interests. |
CMBS Bonds and Collateralized Debt Obligation Bonds and
Preferred Shares (CDOs). Subsequent to
March 31, 2005, the Company completed the sale of its
portfolio of CMBS bonds and CDO bonds and preferred shares on
May 3, 2005, as outlined in Note 15.
Commercial Mortgage Loans and Equity Interests.
The commercial mortgage loan portfolio contains loans
that were originated by the Company or were purchased from
third-party sellers. At March 31, 2005, approximately 94%
and 6% of the Companys commercial mortgage loan portfolio
was composed of fixed and adjustable interest rate loans,
respectively. At December 31, 2004, approximately 94% and
6% of the Companys commercial mortgage loan portfolio was
composed of fixed and adjustable interest rate loans,
respectively. As of March 31, 2005, and December 31,
2004, loans with a value of $22.9 million and
$18.0 million, respectively, were not accruing interest.
Loans greater than 120 days delinquent generally do not
accrue interest.
Equity interests consist primarily of equity securities issued
by privately owned companies that invest in single real estate
properties. These equity interests may be subject to
restrictions on their resale and are generally illiquid. Equity
interests generally do not produce a current return, but are
generally held in anticipation of investment appreciation and
ultimate realized gain on sale.
27
ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Note 3. Portfolio, continued
The property types and the geographic composition securing the
commercial mortgage loans and equity interests at value at
March 31, 2005, and December 31, 2004, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Property Type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospitality
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
49 |
% |
Retail
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Office
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Housing
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Other
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geographic Region
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mid-Atlantic
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
Midwest
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Southeast
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
West
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Northeast
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 4. Debt
At March 31, 2005, and December 31, 2004, the Company
had the following debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Annual | |
|
|
|
Annual | |
|
|
Facility | |
|
Amount | |
|
Interest | |
|
Facility | |
|
Amount | |
|
Interest | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Drawn | |
|
Cost(1) | |
|
Amount | |
|
Drawn | |
|
Cost(1) | |
($ in thousands) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Notes payable and debentures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured notes payable
|
|
$ |
980,935 |
|
|
$ |
980,935 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
$ |
981,368 |
|
|
$ |
981,368 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
SBA debentures
|
|
|
53,800 |
|
|
|
46,500 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
84,800 |
|
|
|
77,500 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
% |
|
OPIC loan
|
|
|
5,700 |
|
|
|
5,700 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
5,700 |
|
|
|
5,700 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total notes payable and debentures
|
|
|
1,040,435 |
|
|
|
1,033,135 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
1,071,868 |
|
|
|
1,064,568 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
Revolving line of credit
|
|
|
587,500 |
|
|
|
263,250 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
%(2) |
|
|
552,500 |
|
|
|
112,000 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
%(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$ |
1,627,935 |
|
|
$ |
1,296,385 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
%(2) |
|
$ |
1,624,368 |
|
|
$ |
1,176,568 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
%(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The weighted average annual interest cost is computed as the (a)
annual stated interest on the debt plus the annual amortization
of commitment fees and other facility fees that are recognized
into interest expense over the contractual life of the
respective borrowings, divided by (b) debt outstanding on the
balance sheet date. |
|
(2) |
The stated interest rate payable on the revolving line of credit
was 4.4% and 4.7% at March 31, 2005, and December 31,
2004, respectively, which excluded the annual cost of commitment
fees and other facility fees of $3.3 million and
$1.8 million, respectively. The annual cost of commitment
fees and other facility fees of $3.3 million at
March 31, 2005, includes the extension fee of
$1.8 million that the Company paid on April 18, 2005,
as discussed below. The annual interest cost for total debt
includes the annual cost of commitment fees and other facility
fees on the revolving line of credit regardless of the amount
drawn on the facility as of the balance sheet date. |
28
ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Note 4. Debt, continued
Notes Payable and Debentures
Unsecured Notes Payable. The Company has issued
unsecured long-term notes to private institutional investors.
The notes require semi-annual interest payments until maturity
and have original terms of five or seven years. At
March 31, 2005, the notes had remaining maturities of
two months to seven years. The notes may be prepaid in
whole or in part, together with an interest premium, as
stipulated in the note agreement.
The Company issued five-year unsecured long-term notes
denominated in Euros and Sterling for a total U.S. dollar
equivalent of $15.2 million. The notes have fixed interest
rates and have substantially the same terms as the
Companys existing unsecured notes. The Euro notes require
annual interest payments and the Sterling notes require
semi-annual interest payments until maturity. Simultaneous with
issuing the notes, the Company entered into a cross currency
swap with a financial institution which fixed the Companys
interest and principal payments in U.S. dollars for the life of
the debt.
SBA Debentures. At March 31, 2005, the
Company had debentures payable to the SBA with original terms of
ten years and at fixed interest rates ranging from 5.9% to 7.5%.
During the first quarter of 2005, the Company repaid
$31.0 million of the SBA debentures. At March 31,
2005, the debentures had remaining maturities of six to
seven years. The debentures require semi-annual
interest-only payments with all principal due upon maturity. The
SBA debentures are subject to prepayment penalties if paid prior
to the fifth anniversary date of the notes.
At March 31, 2005, the Company had a commitment from the
SBA to borrow up to an additional $7.3 million above the
current amount outstanding. The commitment expires on
September 30, 2005.
Scheduled Maturities. Scheduled future maturities
of notes payable and debentures at March 31, 2005, were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Amount Maturing | |
|
|
| |
|
|
($ in thousands) | |
2005
|
|
$ |
165,000 |
|
2006
|
|
|
180,700 |
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
153,000 |
|
2009
|
|
|
268,435 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
266,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,033,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
During the first quarter of 2005, the Company expanded the
committed amount under the unsecured revolving credit facility
to $587.5 million. The committed amount may be further
expanded through new or additional commitments up to $600
million at the Companys option. During the second quarter
of 2005, the Company extended the maturity of the line of credit
to April 2006 under substantially similar terms. The extension
of the facility required payment of an extension fee of 0.3%
29
ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Note 4. Debt, continued
on existing commitments and the interest rate on outstanding
borrowings will increase by 0.5% during the extension period.
After the extension notice, the facility generally bears
interest at a rate, at the Companys option, equal to
(i) the one-month LIBOR plus 2.00%, (ii) the Bank of
America, N.A. cost of funds plus 2.00% or (iii) the higher
of the Bank of America, N.A. prime rate or the Federal Funds
rate plus 1.00%. The interest rate adjusts at the beginning of
each new interest period, usually every 30 days. The
facility requires an annual commitment fee equal to 0.25% of the
committed amount. The annual cost of commitment fees and other
facility fees was $3.3 million and $1.8 million at
March 31, 2005, and December 31, 2004, respectively.
The facility fees at March 31, 2005, include the extension
fee of $1.8 million that the Company paid on April 18,
2005. The line of credit generally requires monthly payments of
interest, and all principal is due upon maturity.
The average debt outstanding on the revolving line of credit was
$72.3 million for the three months ended March 31,
2005. The maximum amount borrowed under this facility and the
weighted average stated interest rate for the three months ended
March 31, 2005, were $263.3 million and 4.1%,
respectively. There were no amounts outstanding on the revolving
line of credit for the three months ended March 31, 2004.
As of March 31, 2005, the amount available under the
revolving line of credit was $287.2 million, net of amounts
committed for standby letters of credit of $37.1 million
issued under the credit facility.
Subsequent to March 31, 2005, in connection with the sale
of the Companys CMBS and CDO assets on May 3, 2005,
as outlined in Note 15, the Company used a portion of the
cash proceeds from the sale to repay outstanding borrowings
under the revolving line of credit.
The Company has various financial and operating covenants
required by the notes payable and debentures and the revolving
line of credit. These covenants require the Company to maintain
certain financial ratios, including debt to equity and interest
coverage, and a minimum net worth. The Companys credit
facilities limit its ability to declare dividends if the Company
defaults under certain provisions. As of March 31, 2005,
and December 31, 2004, the Company was in compliance with
these covenants.
Note 5. Guarantees
In the ordinary course of business, the Company has issued
guarantees and has extended standby letters of credit through
financial intermediaries on behalf of certain portfolio
companies. All standby letters of credit have been issued
through Bank of America, N.A. As of March 31, 2005, and
December 31, 2004, the Company had issued guarantees of
debt, rental obligations, lease obligations and severance
obligations aggregating $109.5 million and
$100.2 million, respectively, and had extended standby
letters of credit aggregating $37.1 million and
$44.1 million, respectively. Under these arrangements, the
Company would be required to make payments to third-party
beneficiaries if the portfolio companies were to default on
their related payment obligations. The maximum amount of
potential future payments was $146.6 million and
$144.3 million at March 31, 2005, and
December 31, 2004, respectively. At March 31, 2005,
and December 31, 2004, $0.3 million and
$0.8 million, respectively, had been recorded as a
liability for the Companys guarantees and no amounts had
been recorded as a liability for the Companys standby
letters of credit.
30
ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Note 5. Guarantees, continued
As of March 31, 2005, the guarantees and standby letters of
credit expire as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
After 2009 | |
(in millions) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Guarantees
|
|
$ |
109.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
104.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
Standby letters of
credit(1)
|
|
|
37.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
146.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
38.0 |
|
|
$ |
104.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Standby letters of credit are issued under the Companys
revolving line of credit that was set to expire in April 2005
and has been extended under substantially similar terms for one
additional year at the Companys option, for an assumed
maturity of April 2006. Therefore, unless a standby letter of
credit is set to expire at an earlier date, it is assumed that
the standby letters of credit will expire contemporaneously with
the expiration of the Companys line of credit in April
2006. |
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into
agreements with service providers and other parties that may
contain provisions for the Company to indemnify such parties
under certain circumstances.
At March 31, 2005, the Company had outstanding commitments
to fund investments totaling $360.7 million. In addition,
during the fourth quarter of 2004 and the first quarter of 2005,
the Company sold certain commercial mortgage loans that the
Company may be required to repurchase under certain
circumstances. These recourse provisions expire by January 2006.
The aggregate outstanding principal balance of these sold loans
was $16.8 million at March 31, 2005.
Note 6. Shareholders Equity
The Company did not sell any common stock during the three
months ended March 31, 2005 or 2004. The Company issued
0.3 million shares of common stock with a value of
$7.2 million as consideration for an additional investment
in Mercury Air Center, Inc. during the three months ended
March 31, 2005.
The Company has a dividend reinvestment plan, whereby the
Company may buy shares of its common stock in the open market or
issue new shares in order to satisfy dividend reinvestment
requests. If the Company issues new shares, the issue price is
equal to the average of the closing sale prices reported for the
Companys common stock for the five consecutive trading
days immediately prior to the dividend payment date. For the
three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company
issued new shares in order to satisfy dividend reinvestment
requests.
Dividend reinvestment plan activity for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three | |
|
|
Months | |
|
|
Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
| |
|
| |
Shares issued
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Average price per share
|
|
$ |
25.65 |
|
|
$ |
29.65 |
|
31
ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Note 7. Earnings Per Common Share
Earnings per common share for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months | |
|
|
Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
| |
|
| |
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
$ |
119,621 |
|
|
$ |
20,308 |
|
Less preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income available to common shareholders
|
|
$ |
119,621 |
|
|
$ |
20,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
133,283 |
|
|
|
128,314 |
|
Dilutive options outstanding to officers
|
|
|
2,296 |
|
|
|
3,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares
outstanding diluted
|
|
|
135,579 |
|
|
|
131,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share
|
|
$ |
0.90 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share
|
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8. Employee Compensation Plans
The Company has a deferred compensation plan. Amounts deferred
by participants under the deferred compensation plan are funded
to a trust, which is administered by trustees. The accounts of
the deferred compensation trust are consolidated with the
Companys accounts. The assets of the trust are classified
as other assets and the liability to the plan participants is
included in other liabilities in the accompanying financial
statements. The deferred compensation plan accounts at
March 31, 2005, and December 31, 2004, totaled
$16.7 million and $16.1 million, respectively.
In the first quarter of 2004, the Company established the
Individual Performance Award (IPA) as a long-term
incentive compensation program for certain officers. In
conjunction with the program, the Board of Directors has
approved a non-qualified deferred compensation plan
(DCP II), which is administered through a trust
by an independent third-party trustee. The administrator of the
DCP II is the Compensation Committee of the Companys
Board of Directors (DCP II Administrator).
The IPA, which will generally be determined annually at the
beginning of each year, is deposited in the trust in four equal
installments, generally on a quarterly basis, in the form of
cash. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
designed the DCP II to require the trustee to use the cash
to purchase shares of the Companys common stock in the
open market. During the three months ended March 31, 2005,
0.1 million shares were purchased in the DCP II.
All amounts deposited and then credited to a participants
account in the trust, based on the amount of the IPA received by
such participant, are credited solely for purposes of accounting
and computation and remain assets of the Company and subject to
the claims of the Companys general creditors. Amounts
credited to participants under the DCP II are immediately
vested and non-forfeitable once deposited by the Company into
the trust. A participants account shall generally
32
ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Note 8. Employee Compensation Plans, continued
become distributable only after his or her termination of
employment, or in the event of a change of control of the
Company. Upon the participants termination of employment,
one-third of the participants account will be immediately
distributed, one-half of the then current remaining balance will
be distributed on the first anniversary of his or her employment
termination date and the remainder of the account balance will
be distributed on the second anniversary of the employment
termination date. Distributions are subject to the
participants adherence to certain non-solicitation
requirements. All DCP II accounts will be distributed in a
single lump sum in the event of a change of control of the
Company. To the extent that a participant has an employment
agreement, such participants DCP II account will be
fully distributed in the event that such participants
employment is terminated for good reason as defined under that
participants employment agreement. The DCP II
Administrator may also determine other distributable events and
the timing of such distributions. Sixty days following a
distributable event, the Company and each participant may, at
the discretion of the Company, and subject to the Companys
trading window during that time, redirect the participants
account to other investment options.
During any period of time in which a participant has an account
in the DCP II, any dividends declared and paid on shares of
the Companys common stock allocated to the
participants account shall be reinvested by the trustee as
soon as practicable in shares of the Companys common stock
purchased in the open market.
For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, IPA
expense was $1.9 million and $3.5 million,
respectively. The IPA amounts were contributed into the
DCP II trust and invested in the Companys common
stock. The accounts of the DCP II are consolidated with the
Companys accounts. The common stock is classified as
common stock held in deferred compensation trust in the
accompanying financial statements and the deferred compensation
obligation, which represents the amount owed to the employees,
is included in other liabilities. Changes in the value of the
Companys common stock held in the deferred compensation
trust are not recognized. However, the liability is marked to
market with a corresponding charge or credit to employee
compensation expense. The effect of this adjustment for the
three months ended March 31, 2005, was to increase the
individual performance award expense by $0.1 million. There
is no adjustment for the three months ended March 31, 2004,
as the contribution to the trust was pending shareholder
approval and was not made until the second quarter of 2004. This
resulted in a total individual performance award expense of
$2.0 million and $3.5 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
As a result of recent changes in regulation by the Jobs Creation
Act of 2004 associated with deferred compensation arrangements,
as well as an increase in the competitive market for recruiting
top performers in private equity firms, the Compensation
Committee of the Companys Board of Directors has
determined for 2005 that a portion of the IPA will be replaced
with an individual performance bonus (IPB). The IPB
for 2005 will be distributed in cash to award recipients in
equal bi-weekly installments as long as the recipient remains
employed by the Company. If a recipient terminates employment
during the year, any remaining cash payments under the IPB would
be forfeited. For the three months ended March 31, 2005,
the IPB expense was $1.5 million. The IPA and IPB expenses
are included in employee expenses.
33
ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Note 9. Stock Option Plan
The purpose of the stock option plan (Option Plan)
is to provide officers and non-officer directors of the Company
with additional incentives. Options are exercisable at a price
equal to the fair market value of the shares on the day the
option is granted. Each option states the period or periods of
time within which the option may be exercised by the optionee,
which may not exceed ten years from the date the option is
granted. The options granted vest ratably over a three-or
five-year period.
All rights to exercise options terminate 60 days after an
optionee ceases to be (i) a non-officer director,
(ii) both an officer and a director, if such optionee
serves in both capacities, or (iii) an officer (if such
officer is not also a director) of the Company for any cause
other than death or total and permanent disability. In the event
of a change of control of the Company, all outstanding options
will become fully vested and exercisable as of the change of
control.
There are 32.2 million shares authorized under the Option
Plan. At March 31, 2005, and December 31, 2004, the
number of shares available to be granted under the Option Plan
was 8.1 million and 7.9 million, respectively. During
the three months ended March 31, 2005, no options were
granted. During the three months ended March 31, 2004,
options for 6.8 million shares were granted to employees
under the Option Plan at an exercise price of $28.98 per share.
Options were outstanding for 20.0 million and
20.4 million shares with a weighted average exercise price
of $23.56 and $23.55 per share at March 31, 2005, and
December 31, 2004, respectively.
Note 10. Dividends and Distributions
The Companys Board of Directors declared and the Company
paid a dividend of $0.57 per common share for the first
quarters of 2005 and 2004. These dividends totaled
$76.1 million and $73.4 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The Company
declared an extra cash dividend of $0.02 per share during 2004
and this was paid to shareholders on January 28, 2005.
The Companys Board of Directors also declared a dividend
of $0.57 per common share for the second quarter of 2005.
Note 11. Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow
Information
For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, the
Company paid $7.0 million and $6.1 million,
respectively, for interest.
Principal collections related to investment repayments or sales
included the collection of discounts previously amortized into
interest income and added to the cost basis of a loan or debt
security totaling $1.1 million and $1.1 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
Non-cash operating activities for the three months ended
March 31, 2005, included the exchange of existing
subordinated debt securities and accrued interest of BLX with a
cost basis of $44.8 million for additional Class B
equity interests (see Note 3), the exchange of debt
securities and accrued interest of Coverall North America, Inc.
with a cost basis of $24.2 million for new debt securities
and
34
ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Note 11. Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow
Information, continued
warrants with a total cost basis of $26.8 million, and the
contribution of existing debt securities of GAC Investments,
Inc. with a cost basis of $11.0 million to capital,
resulting in an increase in the Companys common stock cost
basis.
Non-cash operating activities for the three months ended
March 31, 2004, included notes or other securities received
as consideration from the sale of investments of
$48.3 million. The notes received for the three months
ended March 31, 2004, included a note received for
$47.5 million in conjunction with the sale of Hillman.
During the second quarter of 2004, the Company sold a
$5.0 million participation in its subordinated debt in
Hillman to a third party, which reduced its investment, and no
gain or loss resulted from the transaction.
For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, the
Companys non-cash financing activities included
$1.4 million and $1.5 million, respectively, related
to the issuance of common stock in lieu of cash distributions.
In addition, the non-cash financing activities for the three
months ended March 31, 2005, also included the issuance of
$7.2 million of the Companys common stock as
consideration for an additional investment in Mercury Air
Centers, Inc.
Note 12. Hedging Activities
The Company invests in CMBS and CDO bonds, which are purchased
at prices that are based in part on comparable Treasury rates.
The Company has entered into transactions with one or more
financial institutions to hedge against movement in Treasury
rates on certain of the higher rated CMBS and CDO bonds. These
transactions, referred to as short sales, involve the Company
receiving the proceeds from the short sales of borrowed Treasury
securities, with the obligation to replenish the borrowed
Treasury securities at a later date based on the then current
market price. Borrowed Treasury securities and the related
obligations to replenish the borrowed Treasury securities at
value, including accrued interest payable on the obligations, as
of March 31, 2005, and December 31, 2004, consisted of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Description of Issue |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
5-year Treasury securities, due December 2009
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
533 |
|
10-year Treasury securities, due February 2013
|
|
|
3,776 |
|
|
|
3,908 |
|
10-year Treasury securities, due February 2014
|
|
|
4,550 |
|
|
|
4,709 |
|
10-year Treasury securities, due August 2014
|
|
|
14,235 |
|
|
|
14,743 |
|
10-year Treasury securities, due November 2014
|
|
|
42,120 |
|
|
|
14,333 |
|
10-year Treasury securities, due February 2015
|
|
|
34,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
98,741 |
|
|
$ |
38,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2005, and December 31, 2004, the total
obligations to replenish borrowed Treasury securities had
decreased since the related original sale dates due to changes
in the yield on the borrowed Treasury securities, resulting in
unrealized appreciation on the obligations of $2.3 million
and $0.3 million, respectively.
The net proceeds related to the sales of the borrowed Treasury
securities were $100.9 million and $38.5 million at
March 31, 2005, and December 31, 2004, respectively.
Under the terms of the
35
ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Note 12. Hedging Activities, continued
transactions, the Company had received cash payments of
$2.2 million and $0.3 million at March 31, 2005,
and December 31, 2004, respectively, for the difference
between the net proceeds related to the sales of the borrowed
Treasury securities and the obligations to replenish the
securities.
The Company has deposited the proceeds related to the sales of
the borrowed Treasury securities and the additional cash
collateral with Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC under repurchase
agreements. The repurchase agreements are collateralized by
U.S. Treasury securities and are settled weekly. As of
March 31, 2005, the repurchase agreements were due on
April 6, 2005, and had a weighted average interest rate of
1.7%. The weighted average interest rate on the repurchase
agreements as of December 31, 2004, was 1.3%.
Subsequent to March 31, 2005, in connection with the sale
of the Companys CMBS and CDO assets on May 3, 2005,
as outlined in Note 15, substantially all of these hedge
positions were settled.
Note 13. Financial Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At and for the | |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
At and for the | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005(1) | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Per Common Share
Data(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
|
$ |
14.87 |
|
|
$ |
14.94 |
|
|
$ |
14.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
|
1.52 |
|
|
Net realized
gains(3)
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
1.12 |
|
|
|
0.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income plus net realized gains
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
1.46 |
|
|
|
2.40 |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation
(3)
|
|
|
0.52 |
|
|
|
(1.31 |
) |
|
|
(0.52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations
|
|
|
0.88 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
1.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in net assets from shareholder distributions
|
|
|
(0.57 |
) |
|
|
(0.57 |
) |
|
|
(2.30 |
) |
Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value, end of period
|
|
$ |
15.22 |
|
|
$ |
14.60 |
|
|
$ |
14.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market value, end of period
|
|
$ |
26.10 |
|
|
$ |
30.29 |
|
|
$ |
25.84 |
|
Total
return(4)
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
36
ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Note 13. Financial Highlights, continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At and for the | |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
At and for the | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005(1) | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Ratios and Supplemental Data
($ and shares in thousands, except per
share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending net assets
|
|
$ |
2,033,148 |
|
|
$ |
1,879,970 |
|
|
$ |
1,979,778 |
|
Common shares outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
133,563 |
|
|
|
128,761 |
|
|
|
133,099 |
|
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
135,579 |
|
|
|
131,968 |
|
|
|
132,458 |
|
Employee and administrative expenses/average net assets
|
|
|
1.80 |
% |
|
|
0.96 |
% |
|
|
4.65 |
% |
Total expenses/average net assets
|
|
|
2.81 |
% |
|
|
1.97 |
% |
|
|
8.58 |
% |
Net investment income/average net assets
|
|
|
1.93 |
% |
|
|
2.35 |
% |
|
|
10.45 |
% |
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations/ average
net assets
|
|
|
5.96 |
% |
|
|
1.07 |
% |
|
|
12.97 |
% |
Portfolio turnover rate
|
|
|
5.10 |
% |
|
|
6.83 |
% |
|
|
32.97 |
% |
Average debt outstanding
|
|
$ |
1,125,007 |
|
|
$ |
952,986 |
|
|
$ |
985,616 |
|
Average debt per
share(2)
|
|
$ |
8.30 |
|
|
$ |
7.22 |
|
|
$ |
7.44 |
|
|
|
(1) |
The results for the three months ended March 31, 2005, are
not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be
expected for the full year. |
|
(2) |
Based on diluted weighted average number of common shares
outstanding for the period. |
|
(3) |
Net realized gains and net change in unrealized appreciation or
depreciation can fluctuate significantly from period to period.
As a result, quarterly comparisons may not be meaningful. |
|
(4) |
Total return assumes the reinvestment of all dividends paid for
the periods presented. |
Note 14. Litigation
The Company is party to certain lawsuits in the normal course of
business. While the outcome of these legal proceedings cannot at
this time be predicted with certainty, the Company does not
expect that the outcome of these proceedings will have a
material effect upon the Companys financial condition or
results of operations.
Note 15. Subsequent Event
On May 3, 2005, the Company completed the sale of its
portfolio of CMBS bonds and CDO bonds and preferred shares to
affiliates of Caisse de dépôt et placement du
Québec (the Caisse) for cash proceeds of approximately
$976 million and expects to realize a net gain of
approximately $216 million, after estimated transaction and
other costs of approximately $20 million. The estimated net
gain will be recognized in the second quarter of 2005.
Simultaneous with the sale of the Companys CMBS and CDO
portfolio, the Company entered into certain agreements with
affiliates of the Caisse, including a platform assets purchase
agreement, pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell certain
additional commercial real estate-related assets to the Caisse,
subject to certain adjustments and closing conditions, and a
transition services agreement, pursuant to which the Company
will provide certain transition services for a limited
transition period. Also in connection with the platform assets
purchase agreement, the Company
37
ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Note 15. Subsequent Event
agreed not to invest in CMBS and real estate-related CDOs and
refrain from certain other real estate-related investing or
servicing activities for a period of three years, subject to
certain limitations.
In addition, the Company entered into a letter of intent with an
affiliate of the Caisse pursuant to which the parties agreed to
negotiate in good faith the terms of a definitive agreement
relating to the sale of certain of the Companys commercial
mortgage loans and commercial real estate owned. The letter of
intent does not obligate either party to enter into such a
definitive agreement and terminates on June 30, 2005. At
March 31, 2005, the Companys commercial mortgage
loans, real estate owned and equity interests totaled
$123.3 million at value.
Upon the closing of the sale, the Company repaid outstanding
borrowings on its revolving line of credit of approximately
$200 million and settled all hedge positions relating to
these assets, which resulted in a net realized loss of
approximately $0.7 million, which has been included in the
estimated net realized gain on the sale.
38
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Allied Capital Corporation:
We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of
Allied Capital Corporation and subsidiaries, including the
consolidated statement of investments, as of March 31,
2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
changes in net assets and cash flows and the financial
highlights (included in Note 13) for the three-month periods
ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. These consolidated financial
statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of
the Companys management.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A
review of interim financial information consists principally of
applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons
responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is
substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the
expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements
taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material
modifications that should be made to the consolidated financial
statements and financial highlights referred to above for them
to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
We have previously audited, in accordance with standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheet of Allied Capital Corporation and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, changes in net assets and
cash flows (not presented herein), and the financial highlights
(included in Note 13), for the year then ended; and in our
report dated March 14, 2005, we expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our
opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2004, is
fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the
consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Washington, D.C.
May 4, 2005
39
|
|
Item 2. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations |
The following analysis of the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company should be read in conjunction with
the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements and the
Notes thereto included herein and in the Companys annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2004. In addition, this quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains
certain forward-looking statements. These statements include the
plans and objectives of management for future operations and
financial objectives and can be identified by the use of
forward-looking terminology such as may,
will, expect, intend,
anticipate, estimate, or
continue or the negative thereof or other variations
thereon or comparable terminology. These forward-looking
statements are subject to the inherent uncertainties in
predicting future results and conditions. Certain factors that
could cause actual results and conditions to differ materially
from those projected in these forward-looking statements are set
forth below in the Risk Factors section. Other factors that
could cause actual results to differ materially include:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in the economy; |
|
|
|
risks associated with possible disruption in our operations
due to terrorism; |
|
|
|
future changes in laws or regulations and conditions in our
operating areas; and |
|
|
|
other risks and uncertainties as may be detailed from time to
time in our public announcements and SEC filings. |
Financial or other information presented for private finance
portfolio companies has been obtained from the portfolio
companies, and the financial information presented may represent
unaudited, projected or pro forma financial information, and
therefore may not be indicative of actual results. In addition,
the private equity industry uses financial measures such as
EBITDA or EBITDAM (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes,
Depreciation, Amortization and, in some instances, Management
fees) in order to assess a portfolio companys financial
performance and to value a portfolio company. EBITDA and EBITDAM
are not intended to represent cash flow from operations as
defined by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and
such information should not be considered as an alternative to
net income, cash flow from operations or any other measure of
performance prescribed by U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
OVERVIEW
We are a business development company that provides long-term
debt and equity investment capital to companies in a variety of
industries. Our lending and investment activity has generally
been focused on private finance and commercial real estate
finance, primarily the investment in non-investment grade
commercial mortgage-backed securities, which we refer to as
CMBS, and collateralized debt obligation bonds and preferred
shares, which we refer to as CDOs. Our private finance activity
principally involves providing financing through privately
negotiated long-term debt and equity investment capital. Our
private financing is generally used to fund growth,
acquisitions, buyouts, recapitalizations, note purchases, bridge
financings, and other types of financings. We generally invest
in private companies though, from time to time, we may invest in
companies that are public but lack access to additional public
capital or whose securities may not be marginable.
40
Our portfolio composition at March 31, 2005, and
December 31, 2004, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Private finance
|
|
|
74 |
% |
|
|
76 |
% |
Commercial real estate finance
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
On May 3, 2005, we completed the sale of our portfolio of CMBS
and CDO investments. Upon the completion of this transaction,
our lending and investment activity will be focused primarily on
private finance investments. See Recent Developments
below.
Our earnings depend primarily on the level of interest and
dividend income, fee and other income, and net gains or losses
earned on our investment portfolio after deducting interest
expense on borrowed capital and operating expenses. Interest
income results from the stated interest rate earned on a loan or
debt security and the amortization of loan origination fees and
discounts. The level of interest income is directly related to
the balance of the interest-bearing investment portfolio
outstanding during the period multiplied by the weighted average
yield. Our ability to generate interest income is dependent on
economic, regulatory, and competitive factors that influence new
investment activity, the amount of loans and debt securities for
which interest is not accruing and our ability to secure debt
and equity capital for our investment activities.
Because we are a regulated investment company for tax purposes,
we intend to distribute substantially all of our annual taxable
income as dividends to our shareholders.
PORTFOLIO AND INVESTMENT ACTIVITY
The total portfolio at value, investment activity, and the yield
on interest-bearing investments at and for the three months
ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, and at and for the year
ended December 31, 2004, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At and for the | |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
At and for the | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
($ in millions) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
Portfolio at value
|
|
$ |
3,195.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,399.6 |
|
|
$ |
3,013.4 |
|
Investments funded
|
|
$ |
265.6 |
|
|
$ |
217.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,524.5 |
|
Change in accrued or reinvested interest and dividends
|
|
$ |
10.5 |
|
|
$ |
13.1 |
|
|
$ |
52.2 |
|
Principal collections related to investment repayments or sales
|
|
$ |
158.3 |
|
|
$ |
237.1 |
|
|
$ |
909.2 |
|
Yield on interest-bearing
investments(1)
|
|
|
13.6 |
% |
|
|
14.3 |
% |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
(1) |
The weighted average yield on interest-bearing investments is
computed as the (a) annual stated interest plus the annual
amortization of loan origination fees, original issue discount,
and market discount on accruing interest-bearing investments
less the annual amortization of loan origination costs, divided
by (b) total interest-bearing investments at value. The
weighted average yield is computed as of the balance sheet date. |
41
Private Finance
The private finance portfolio at value, investment activity, and
the yield on loans and debt securities at and for the three
months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, and at and for the
year ended December 31, 2004, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At and for the | |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
At and for the | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
($ in millions) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
Portfolio at value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and debt securities
|
|
$ |
1,556.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,182.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,602.9 |
|
|
Equity interests
|
|
|
822.1 |
|
|
|
503.0 |
|
|
|
699.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total portfolio
|
|
$ |
2,378.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,685.6 |
|
|
$ |
2,302.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
funded(1)
|
|
$ |
168.2 |
|
|
$ |
157.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,140.8 |
|
Change in accrued or reinvested interest and dividends
|
|
$ |
7.9 |
|
|
$ |
11.1 |
|
|
$ |
45.6 |
|
Principal collections related to investment repayments or sales
|
|
$ |
151.2 |
|
|
$ |
204.8 |
|
|
$ |
551.9 |
|
Yield on interest-bearing
investments(2)
|
|
|
13.8 |
% |
|
|
14.4 |
% |
|
|
13.9 |
% |
|
|
(1) |
Investments funded for the three months ended March 31,
2004, include a $47.5 million subordinated debt investment
in The Hillman Companies, Inc. received in conjunction with the
sale of Hillman as discussed below. |
|
(2) |
The weighted average yield on loans and debt securities is
computed as the (a) annual stated interest plus the annual
amortization of loan origination fees, original issue discount,
and market discount on accruing loans and debt securities less
the annual amortization of loan origination costs, divided by
(b) total loans and debt securities at value. The weighted
average yield is computed as of the balance sheet date. |
The level of investment activity for investments funded and
principal repayments for private finance investments can vary
substantially from period to period depending on many factors,
including the amount of debt and equity capital available to
middle market companies, the level of merger and acquisition
activity for such companies, the general economic environment,
and the competitive environment for the types of investments we
make. We believe that merger and acquisition activity in the
middle market was strong in 2004 and the first quarter of 2005,
which when combined with a lower interest rate environment
resulted in an increase in private finance investments funded,
as well as increased repayments. The first quarter of the year
tends to be a seasonally slower period for deal closings as the
industry recovers from what is typically an active fourth
quarter closing schedule.
Investments funded for the three months ended March 31,
2005 and 2004, and for the year ended December 31, 2004,
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt | |
|
Equity | |
|
|
|
|
Securities | |
|
Interests | |
|
Total | |
($ in millions) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companies more than 25% owned
|
|
$ |
65.8 |
|
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
|
$ |
72.1 |
|
|
Companies 5% to 25% owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companies less than 5% owned
|
|
|
87.9 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
96.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
153.7 |
|
|
$ |
14.5 |
|
|
$ |
168.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companies more than 25% owned
|
|
$ |
16.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
17.5 |
|
|
Companies 5% to 25% owned
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
Companies less than 5% owned
|
|
|
108.9 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
114.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
135.8 |
|
|
$ |
21.9 |
|
|
$ |
157.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt | |
|
Equity | |
|
|
|
|
Securities | |
|
Interests | |
|
Total | |
($ in millions) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companies more than 25% owned
|
|
$ |
445.4 |
|
|
$ |
171.2 |
|
|
$ |
616.6 |
|
|
Companies 5% to 25% owned
|
|
|
112.0 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
126.4 |
|
|
Companies less than 5% owned
|
|
|
351.5 |
|
|
|
46.3 |
|
|
|
397.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
908.9 |
|
|
$ |
231.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,140.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We intend to continue a balanced approach to private finance
investing that emphasizes a complementary mix of non-control
investments and buyout investments, subject to regulatory
diversity requirements. The combination of these two types of
investments provides current interest and related portfolio
income and the potential for future capital gains. Our current
strategy is to focus on buyout and recapitalization transactions
where we can control a portfolio company to manage risk and
where we can potentially realize more attractive total returns
from both current interest and fee income and future capital
gains. In addition to our mezzanine investing, we are also
focusing on smaller middle market companies for non-control
transactions where we can provide both senior and subordinated
debt.
We generally fund new investments using cash. In addition, we
may acquire securities in exchange for our common equity. Also,
we may acquire new securities through the reinvestment of
previously accrued interest and dividends in debt or equity
securities, or the current reinvestment of interest and dividend
income through the receipt of a debt or equity security
(payment-in-kind income). From time to time we may opt to
reinvest accrued interest receivable in a new debt or equity
security in lieu of receiving such interest in cash.
At March 31, 2005, we had outstanding investment
commitments to private finance portfolio companies totaling
$285.4 million including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
We have various commitments to Callidus Capital Corporation
(Callidus), an asset management company that structures and
manages collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), collateralized
loan obligations (CLOs), and other related investments. We own
80% of the equity of the management company. Our commitment to
Callidus consists of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount | |
|
|
Committed | |
|
Amount | |
|
Available | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Drawn | |
|
to be Drawn | |
($ in millions) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Subordinated debt to support warehouse facilities &
warehousing
activities(1)
|
|
$ |
50.0 |
(2) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
50.0 |
|
Revolving line of credit for working capital
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Revolving line of credit facility to support underwriting and
syndication activities
|
|
|
150.0 |
|
|
|
54.9 |
|
|
|
95.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
202.0 |
|
|
$ |
56.2 |
|
|
$ |
145.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Callidus has a secured warehouse credit facility with a third
party for up to $300 million, primarily to finance the
acquisition of loans pending securitization through a CDO or
CLO. In conjunction with this warehouse credit facility, we have
agreed to designate up to $45 million of our $50 million
subordinated debt commitment for Callidus to draw upon to
provide first loss capital as needed to support the warehouse
facility. |
|
|
(2) |
Subsequent to March 31, 2005, Callidus obtained an additional
secured warehouse credit facility with a third party for up to
$400 million to finance the acquisition of loans pending
securitization through a CDO or CLO. In conjunction with this
warehouse credit facility, we increased our $50 million
subordinated debt commitment to $85 million to provide
Callidus with first loss capital to support outstanding
warehouse facilities. We have agreed to designate this
$85 million subordinated debt commitment for Callidus to
draw upon to provide first loss capital as needed to support its
warehouse facilities. |
43
|
|
|
In addition, we had a commitment to Callidus to purchase
preferred equity in future CDO or CLO transactions of
$44.4 million at March 31, 2005. Subsequent to March
31, 2005, we increased our commitment to purchase preferred
equity securities in Callidus future CDO or CLO
transactions to $76.8 million. |
|
|
|
|
|
$20.0 million in the form of a revolving credit facility to
Business Loan Express, LLC (BLX) to provide working capital to
the company. At March 31, 2005, BLX had no outstanding
borrowings on the facility. |
|
|
|
$15.0 million in the form of debt of financing commitments
to S.B. Restaurant Company. |
|
|
|
$17.1 million in the form of equity to eight private
venture capital funds. |
|
|
|
$8.8 million in the form of equity to Pennsylvania Avenue
Investors, L.P., a limited partnership controlled by us that
invests in private buyout equity funds. |
We may be required to fund additional amounts under earn-out
arrangements primarily related to the purchase of controlled
portfolio companies in the future if those companies meet
agreed-upon performance targets. In addition, we had commitments
to private finance portfolio companies in the form of standby
letters of credit and guarantees totaling $143.9 million.
On March 31, 2004, we sold our control investment in The Hillman
Companies, Inc. (Hillman) for a total transaction value of $510
million, including the repayment of outstanding debt and adding
the value of Hillmans outstanding trust preferred shares.
We were repaid our existing $44.6 million in outstanding
debt. Total consideration to us from this sale, including the
repayment of debt, was $245.6 million, which included net
cash proceeds of $198.1 million and the receipt of a new
subordinated debt instrument of $47.5 million. During the second
quarter of 2004, we sold a $5.0 million participation in
our subordinated debt in Hillman to a third party, which reduced
our investment, and no gain or loss resulted from the
transaction. For the year ended December 31, 2004, we realized a
gain of $150.3 million on the transaction.
The yield on the private finance loans and debt securities was
13.8% at March 31, 2005, as compared to 13.9% at December
31, 2004. The weighted average yield on the private finance
loans and debt securities may fluctuate from period to period
depending on the yield on new loans and debt securities, the
yield on loans and debt securities repaid, and the amount of
lower-yielding senior debt that has been funded to controlled
portfolio companies. We may fund most or all of the debt and
equity capital upon the closing of certain buyout transactions,
which may include investments in lower-yielding senior debt. In
addition, we may provide lower-yielding senior debt to existing
controlled portfolio companies. We currently expect that a
portion of the senior debt outstanding to controlled portfolio
companies at March 31, 2005, may be refinanced by the
portfolio companies during the remainder of 2005.
Our largest investments at March 31, 2005, were in
Advantage Sales & Marketing, Inc. and Business Loan Express,
LLC (BLX).
Advantage Sales and Marketing,
Inc. At March 31,
2005, our investment in Advantage Sales & Marketing, Inc.
(Advantage) totaled $260.3 million at cost and
$353.4 million at value, or 10.1% of our total assets,
which includes unrealized appreciation of $93.1 million.
Total interest and related portfolio income earned from our
investment in Advantage for the three months ended
March 31, 2005, was $9.2 million, which includes
interest income of $7.7 million and fees and other income
of $1.5 million. Net change in unrealized appreciation or
depreciation for the three months ended March 31, 2005,
includes $68.9 million of unrealized appreciation related
to Advantage.
44
Advantage is a leading sales and marketing agency providing
outsourced sales, merchandising, and marketing services to the
consumer packaged goods industry. We completed the purchase of a
majority ownership in Advantage in June 2004. Advantage has
offices across the United States and is headquartered in Irvine,
CA.
Business Loan Express,
LLC. At March 31,
2005, our investment in BLX totaled $282.2 million at cost
and $330.7 million at value, or 9.4% of our total assets,
which includes unrealized appreciation of $48.5 million.
BLX was acquired in 2000.
Total interest and related portfolio income earned from the
Companys investment in BLX for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004, was $7.8 million and
$11.1 million, respectively, which includes interest income
on the subordinated debt and Class A equity interests of
$3.4 million and $5.6 million, respectively, dividend
income on Class B interests of $2.0 million and
$2.0 million, respectively, and fees and other income of
$2.4 million and $3.5 million, respectively. Interest
and dividend income from BLX for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004, included interest and dividend
income of $1.6 million and $2.6 million, respectively,
which was paid in kind. The interest and dividends paid in kind
were paid to the Company through the issuance of additional debt
or equity interests. Accrued interest and dividends receivable
at March 31, 2005, included accrued interest and dividends
due from BLX totaling $4.2 million, of which
$3.8 million was paid in cash in early April 2005.
BLX is a national, non-bank lender utilizing the
SBAs 7(a) Guaranteed Loan Program and is licensed by
the SBA as a Small Business Lending Company (SBLC). BLX is a
nationwide preferred lender, as designated by the SBA, and
originates, sells, and services small business loans. In
addition to the SBA 7(a) Guaranteed Loan Program, BLX
originates conventional small business loans, originates loans
under the USDA Business and Industry Guaranteed Loan Program
(B&I) and during the quarter ended March 31, 2004,
began originating small investment real estate loans. BLX has
offices across the United States and is headquartered in New
York, New York. Changes in the laws or regulations that govern
SBLCs or the SBA 7(a) Guaranteed Loan Program or changes in
government funding for this program could have a material
adverse impact on BLX and, as a result, could negatively affect
our financial results.
As a limited liability company, BLXs taxable income flows
through directly to its members. BLXs annual taxable
income generally differs from its book income for the fiscal
year due to temporary and permanent differences in the
recognition of income and expenses. We hold all of BLXs
Class A and Class B interests, and 94.9% of the
Class C interests. BLXs taxable income is first
allocated to the Class A interests to the extent that
dividends are paid in cash or in kind on such interests, with
the remainder being allocated to the Class B and C
interests. BLX declares dividends on its Class B interests
based on an estimate of its annual taxable income allocable to
such interests.
At December 31, 2004, our subordinated debt investment in BLX
was $44.6 million at cost and value. Effective January 1,
2005, this debt plus accrued interest of $0.2 million was
exchanged for Class B equity interests of $44.8 million,
which is included in private finance equity interests. We
believe this exchange strengthened BLXs equity capital
base and simplified its capital structure. Since the
subordinated debt is no longer outstanding, the amount of
taxable income available to flow through to BLXs equity
holders will increase by the amount of interest that would have
otherwise been paid on this debt.
We have a commitment to BLX of $20.0 million in the form of
a revolving credit facility to provide working capital to the
company. This facility matures on June 30, 2005. At
March 31, 2005, BLX had no outstanding borrowings under
this facility.
45
At March 31, 2005, BLX had a three-year $275.0 million
revolving credit facility that matures in January 2007. The
facility provides for a sub-facility for the issuance of letters
of credit for up to a total of $50.0 million. As the controlling
equity owner in BLX, we have provided an unconditional guaranty
to the revolving credit facility lenders in an amount equal to
50% of the total obligations (consisting of principal, letters
of credit issued under the facility, accrued interest, and other
fees) of BLX under the revolving credit facility. At
March 31, 2005, the principal amount outstanding on the
revolving credit facility was $186.5 million and letters of
credit issued under the facility were $22.0 million. The
total obligation guaranteed by us at March 31, 2005, was
$104.6 million. This guaranty can be called by the lenders
only in the event of a default by BLX. BLX was in compliance
with the terms of the revolving credit facility at
March 31, 2005. At March 31, 2005, we had also
provided four standby letters of credit totaling
$35.6 million in connection with four term securitization
transactions completed by BLX.
46
Commercial Real Estate Finance
The commercial real estate finance portfolio at value,
investment activity, and the yield on interest-bearing
investments at and for the three months ended March 31,
2005 and 2004, and at and for the year ended December 31,
2004, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At and for the | |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, | |
|
At and for | |
|
|
| |
|
the Year Ended | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
Value | |
|
Yield(1) | |
|
Value | |
|
Yield(1) | |
|
Value | |
|
Yield(1) | |
($ in millions) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Portfolio at value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CMBS bonds
|
|
$ |
466.1 |
|
|
|
13.0% |
|
|
$ |
448.9 |
|
|
|
13.7% |
|
|
$ |
373.8 |
|
|
|
14.6% |
|
|
CDO bonds and preferred shares
|
|
|
227.1 |
|
|
|
15.8% |
|
|
|
171.4 |
|
|
|
17.6% |
|
|
|
212.6 |
|
|
|
16.8% |
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans
|
|
|
89.7 |
|
|
|
6.4% |
|
|
|
74.8 |
|
|
|
7.8% |
|
|
|
95.0 |
|
|
|
6.8% |
|
|
Real estate owned
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity interests
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total portfolio
|
|
$ |
816.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
714.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
711.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments funded
|
|
$ |
97.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
60.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
383.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in accrued or reinvested interest
|
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Principal collections related to investment repayments or sales
|
|
$ |
7.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
32.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
357.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The weighted average yield on the interest-bearing investments
is computed as the (a) annual stated interest rate plus the
annual amortization of loan origination fees, original issue
discount, and market discount on accruing interest-bearing
investments less the annual amortization of origination costs,
divided by (b) total interest-bearing investments at value.
The weighted average yield is computed as of the balance sheet
date. Interest-bearing investments for the commercial real
estate finance portfolio include all investments except for real
estate owned and equity interests. |
Our commercial real estate investments funded for the three
months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, and for the year
ended December 31, 2004, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Face | |
|
|
|
Amount | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Discount | |
|
Funded | |
($ in millions) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CMBS bonds (3 new issuances)
|
|
$ |
160.6 |
|
|
$ |
(67.4 |
) |
|
$ |
93.2 |
|
Commercial mortgage loans
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
3.4 |
|
Equity interests
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
165.5 |
|
|
$ |
(68.1 |
) |
|
$ |
97.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CMBS bonds (4 new
issuances(1))
|
|
$ |
114.3 |
|
|
$ |
(54.9 |
) |
|
$ |
59.4 |
|
Commercial mortgage loans
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Equity interests
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
115.0 |
|
|
$ |
(54.9 |
) |
|
$ |
60.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Face | |
|
|
|
Amount | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Discount | |
|
Funded | |
($ in millions) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CMBS bonds (13 new
issuances(1))
|
|
$ |
419.1 |
|
|
$ |
(183.7 |
) |
|
$ |
235.4 |
|
CDO bonds and preferred shares (3 issuances)
|
|
|
40.5 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
40.4 |
|
Commercial mortgage loans
|
|
|
112.1 |
|
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
|
103.9 |
|
Equity interests
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
575.7 |
|
|
$ |
(192.0 |
) |
|
$ |
383.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
CMBS investments also include investments in issuances in which
we have previously purchased CMBS bonds. |
At March 31, 2005, we had outstanding funding commitments
related to commercial mortgage loans and equity interests of
$75.3 million and commitments in the form of standby
letters of credit and guarantees related to equity interests of
$2.7 million.
CMBS Bonds and Collateralized Debt Obligation Bonds and
Preferred Shares. As outlined below under the caption
Recent Developments, we completed the sale of our
portfolio of CMBS bonds and CDO bonds and preferred shares to a
third party on May 3, 2005.
Hedging Activities
We have invested in CMBS and CDO bonds, which are purchased at
prices that are based in part on comparable Treasury rates. We
have entered into transactions with financial institutions to
hedge against movement in Treasury rates on certain of the
higher rated CMBS and CDO bonds. These transactions, referred to
as short sales, involve receiving the proceeds from the short
sales of borrowed Treasury securities, with the obligation to
replenish the borrowed Treasury securities at a later date based
on the then current market price, whatever that price may be.
Risks in these contracts arise from movements in the value of
the borrowed Treasury securities due to changes in interest
rates and from the possible inability of counterparties to meet
the terms of their contracts. If the value of the borrowed
Treasury securities increases, we will incur losses on these
transactions. These losses are limited to the increase in value
of the borrowed Treasury securities; conversely, the value of
the hedged CMBS and CDO bonds would likely increase. If the
value of the borrowed Treasury securities decreases, we will
incur gains on these transactions which are limited to the
decline in value of the borrowed Treasury securities;
conversely, the value of the hedged CMBS and CDO bonds would
likely decrease. We do not anticipate nonperformance by any
counterparty in connection with these transactions.
The total obligations to replenish borrowed Treasury securities,
including accrued interest payable on the obligations, were
$98.7 million and $38.2 million at March 31,
2005, and December 31, 2004, respectively. The net proceeds
related to the sales of the borrowed Treasury securities plus or
minus the additional cash collateral provided or received under
the terms of the transactions were $98.7 million and
$38.2 million at March 31, 2005, and December 31,
2004, respectively. The amount of the hedge will vary from
period to period depending upon the amount of higher rated CMBS
and CDO bonds that we own and have hedged as of the balance
sheet date.
In connection with the sale of CMBS and CDO assets, as outlined
below, substantially all of these hedge positions were settled
subsequent to March 31, 2005.
Portfolio Asset Quality
Portfolio by Grade. We employ a standard grading
system for our entire portfolio. Grade 1 is used for those
investments from which a capital gain is expected. Grade 2
is used for investments performing in accordance with plan.
Grade 3 is used for investments that require closer
monitoring;
48
however, no loss of investment return or principal is expected.
Grade 4 is used for investments that are in workout and for
which some loss of current investment return is expected, but no
loss of principal is expected. Grade 5 is used for
investments that are in workout and for which some loss of
principal is expected.
At March 31, 2005, and December 31, 2004, our
portfolio was graded as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2005 | |
|
At December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Portfolio | |
|
Percentage of | |
|
Portfolio | |
|
Percentage of | |
Grade |
|
at Value | |
|
Total Portfolio | |
|
at Value | |
|
Total Portfolio | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
$ |
1,073.8 |
|
|
|
33.6 |
% |
|
$ |
952.5 |
|
|
|
31.6 |
% |
2
|
|
|
1,939.5 |
|
|
|
60.7 |
|
|
|
1,850.5 |
|
|
|
61.4 |
|
3
|
|
|
94.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
121.2 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
4
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
5
|
|
|
80.0 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
77.5 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,195.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
3,013.4 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We continued to include our CMBS and CDO investments in
Grade 2 assets at March 31, 2005, due to the
uncertainty as to whether the unrealized appreciation or
depreciation on our CMBS and CDO investments would have resulted
in a realized gain or loss if the CMBS and CDO investments would
have been sold on a security-by-security basis. See the
Recent Developments caption below.
Total Grade 3, 4 and 5 portfolio assets as a percentage of
the total portfolio at value at March 31, 2005, and
December 31, 2004, were 5.7% and 7.0%, respectively.
Included in Grade 3, 4 and 5 assets at March 31, 2005,
and December 31, 2004, were portfolio assets totaling
$32.9 million and $38.3 million, respectively, that
are secured by commercial real estate.
Grade 4 and 5 assets include loans, debt securities, and
equity securities. We expect that a number of portfolio
companies will be in the Grades 4 or 5 categories from time
to time. Part of the business of private finance is working with
troubled portfolio companies to improve their businesses and
protect our investment. The number of portfolio companies and
related investment amount included in Grade 4 and 5 may
fluctuate from period to period. We continue to follow our
historical practice of working with such companies in order to
recover the maximum amount of our investment.
Loans and Debt Securities on Non-Accrual Status.
At March 31, 2005, and December 31, 2004,
loans and debt securities at value not accruing interest for the
total investment portfolio were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
($ in millions) |
|
| |
|
| |
Loans and debt securities in workout status (classified as
Grade 4
or 5)(1) |
|
Private finance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companies more than 25% owned
|
|
$ |
26.2 |
|
|
$ |
34.4 |
|
|
|
Companies less than 5% owned
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
Commercial real estate finance
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
Loans and debt securities not in workout status
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private finance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companies more than 25% owned
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
29.4 |
|
|
|
Companies 5% to 25% owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
Companies less than 5% owned
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
Commercial real estate finance
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
94.3 |
|
|
$ |
114.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of total portfolio
|
|
|
3.0% |
|
|
|
3.8% |
|
|
|
(1) |
Workout loans and debt securities exclude equity securities that
are included in the total Grade 4 and 5 assets above. |
49
Loans and Debt Securities Over 90 Days Delinquent.
Loans and debt securities greater than 90 days
delinquent at value at March 31, 2005, and
December 31, 2004, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
Private finance
|
|
$ |
85.8 |
|
|
$ |
73.5 |
|
Commercial real estate finance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CMBS bonds
|
|
|
55.3 |
|
|
|
49.0 |
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
154.8 |
|
|
$ |
132.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of total portfolio
|
|
|
4.8% |
|
|
|
4.4% |
|
Loans and debt securities on non-accrual status and over
90 days delinquent should not be added together as they are
two separate measures of portfolio asset quality. Loans and debt
securities that are in both categories (i.e., on non-accrual
status and over 90 days delinquent) totaled
$56.2 million and $43.9 million at March 31,
2005, and December 31, 2004, respectively, which included
loans and debt securities that are secured by commercial real
estate of $7.8 million and $10.2 million, respectively.
As a provider of long-term privately negotiated investment
capital, we may defer payment of principal or interest from time
to time. The nature of our private finance portfolio company
relationships frequently provide an opportunity for portfolio
companies to negotiate with us to amend the terms of payment to
us or to restructure their debt and equity capital. During such
restructuring, we may not receive or accrue interest or dividend
payments. As a result, the amount of the private finance
portfolio that is greater than 90 days delinquent or on
non-accrual status may vary from period to period. The
investment portfolio is priced to provide current returns for
shareholders assuming that a portion of the portfolio at any
time may not be accruing interest currently. We also price our
private finance investments for a total return including
interest or dividends plus gains from the sale of equity
securities.
For CMBS bonds, interest payments are made to bondholders from
the cash flow on the underlying collateral. To the extent there
are defaults and unrecoverable losses on the underlying
collateral resulting in reduced cash flows, the lower rated
tranches of the CMBS bonds in which we invest may not receive
current interest payments and, therefore, may become delinquent.
However, if the reduced cash flows resulting from defaults or
losses in the underlying collateral pool have been factored into
our yield on the bonds, we may continue to accrue interest on
the bonds to the extent that we expect to collect such interest
over time.
Given these factors, the amount of loans, debt securities, or
CMBS bonds on non-accrual status or greater than 90 days
delinquent is not necessarily an indication of future principal
loss or loss of anticipated investment return. Our portfolio
grading system is used as a means to assess loss of investment
return or investment principal.
Accrued Interest and Dividends Receivable
Accrued interest and dividends receivable as of March 31,
2005 and December 31, 2004, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
($ in millions) |
|
| |
|
| |
Private finance
|
|
$ |
59.6 |
|
|
$ |
59.8 |
|
Commercial real estate finance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CMBS and CDO bonds
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
Commercial mortgage loans and other
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
81.9 |
|
|
$ |
79.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
Recent Developments
On May 3, 2005, we completed the sale of our portfolio of
commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) and
collateralized debt obligation (CDO) bonds and preferred
shares to affiliates of Caisse de dépôt et placement
du Québec (the Caisse) for cash proceeds of approximately
$976 million and a net realized gain of approximately
$216 million, after estimated transaction and other costs
of approximately $20 million. The estimated net gain will
be recognized in the second quarter of 2005.
Simultaneous with the sale of our CMBS and CDO portfolio, we
entered into a platform assets purchase agreement with CWCapital
Investments LLC, an affiliate of the Caisse (CWCapital),
pursuant to which we agreed to sell certain commercial real
estate related assets, including servicer advances, intellectual
property, software and other platform assets, subject to certain
adjustments. We expect that any gain or loss on this transaction
will be insignificant. This transaction is expected to close by
the end of the second quarter of 2005, subject to certain
closing conditions. Under this agreement, we have agreed not to
invest in CMBS and real estate-related CDOs and refrain from
certain other real estate-related investing or servicing
activities for a period of three years, subject to certain
limitations. The real estate securities purchase agreement,
under which we sold the CMBS and CDO portfolio, and the platform
asset purchase agreement contain customary representations and
warranties, and require us to indemnify the affiliates of the
Caisse that are parties to the agreements for certain
liabilities arising under the agreements, subject to certain
limitations and conditions.
We have also entered into a transition services agreement with
CWCapital pursuant to which we will provide certain transition
services to CWCapital for a limited transition period to
facilitate the transfer of various servicing and other rights
related to the CMBS and CDO portfolio. During the transition
period, we have agreed, among other things, to continue to act
as servicer or special servicer with respect to the CMBS and CDO
portfolio, and to use commercially reasonable efforts to
continue to employ employees who were responsible for overseeing
this portfolio. We will be reimbursed for the direct costs and
out-of-pocket expenses associated with servicing these assets
under the transition services agreement.
In addition, we entered into a letter of intent with an
affiliate of the Caisse pursuant to which the parties agreed to
negotiate in good faith the terms of a definitive agreement
relating to the sale of certain of our commercial mortgage loans
and commercial real estate owned. The letter of intent does not
obligate either party to enter into such a definitive agreement
and terminates on June 30, 2005.
Upon the closing of the sale of the CMBS and CDO portfolio, we
repaid outstanding borrowings on our revolving line of credit of
approximately $200 million. We plan to use the remaining
cash proceeds from the sale of the CMBS and CDO portfolio to
invest in private finance investments, to repay maturing notes
payable, of which $40 million matures in May 2005, and for
general corporate purposes.
We expect that our net investment income will be lower in the
near term until the proceeds from the CMBS and CDO asset sale
can be redeployed into private finance debt and equity
investments, but it is expected that any reduction in net
investment income will be offset by the estimated
$216 million net gain realized from the sale.
The CMBS and CDO assets sold had a cost basis at closing of
approximately $740 million, including accrued interest and
a CMBS asset with a cost basis of approximately $28 million
that we purchased in April 2005. Estimated transaction and other
costs of approximately $20 million include investment
banking fees, legal and other professional fees, employee
compensation related costs associated with payments under
retention agreements and transition services bonuses, and other
transaction costs. The transition services bonuses included in
the estimated expenses will be payable upon completion of the
performance of services under the transition services agreement
to certain
51
employees in the commercial real estate group, including John
Scheurer, Douglas Cooper and Jordan Paul, managing directors.
The transition services bonuses total approximately
$3.1 million, which includes $1.0 million for John
Scheurer.
For tax purposes, we estimate that the net gain from the sale of
the CMBS and CDO portfolio will be approximately
$229 million, after estimated transaction and other costs.
The difference between the net gain for book and tax purposes
results from temporary differences in the recognition of income
and expenses related to these assets. Our dividend is paid from
taxable income. Taxable income for 2005, including this gain, is
expected to exceed dividends paid to shareholders in 2005, and
we expect to spill over excess taxable income to the next tax
year as permitted under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. We
will generally be required to pay a 4% excise tax on any taxable
income retained and paid as dividends in the next tax year. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Regulated
Investment Company Status.
As discussed above, we previously entered into transactions with
financial institutions to hedge against movement in Treasury
rates on certain of the higher rated CMBS and CDO bonds, which
were purchased at prices that were based in part on comparable
Treasury rates. Concurrently with the completion of the sale of
our CMBS and CDO portfolio, we settled any hedges relating to
these assets, which resulted in a net realized loss of
approximately $0.7 million, which has been included in the
estimated net realized gain on the sale.
52
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Comparison of Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 and
2004
The following table summarizes the Companys operating
results for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Percentage | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
Change | |
|
Change | |
($ in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(unaudited) | |
|
|
|
|
Interest and Related Portfolio Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and dividends
|
|
$ |
84,945 |
|
|
$ |
73,539 |
|
|
$ |
11,406 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
Loan prepayment premiums
|
|
|
1,677 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
77 |
% |
|
Fees and other income
|
|
|
8,297 |
|
|
|
7,276 |
|
|
|
1,021 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest and related portfolio income
|
|
|
94,919 |
|
|
|
81,765 |
|
|
|
13,154 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
20,225 |
|
|
|
19,113 |
|
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
Employee
|
|
|
15,456 |
|
|
|
12,355 |
|
|
|
3,101 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
Administrative
|
|
|
20,754 |
|
|
|
5,827 |
|
|
|
14,927 |
|
|
|
256 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
56,435 |
|
|
|
37,295 |
|
|
|
19,140 |
|
|
|
51 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income before income taxes
|
|
|
38,484 |
|
|
|
44,470 |
|
|
|
(5,986 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
)% |
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(268 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
38,752 |
|
|
|
44,545 |
|
|
|
(5,793 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Realized and Unrealized Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gains (losses)
|
|
|
10,285 |
|
|
|
147,850 |
|
|
|
(137,565 |
) |
|
|
* |
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation
|
|
|
70,584 |
|
|
|
(172,087 |
) |
|
|
242,671 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net gains
|
|
|
80,869 |
|
|
|
(24,237 |
) |
|
|
105,106 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
119,621 |
|
|
$ |
20,308 |
|
|
$ |
99,313 |
|
|
|
489 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share
|
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
|
487 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
135,579 |
|
|
|
131,968 |
|
|
|
3,611 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
* |
Net realized gains (losses) and net change in unrealized
appreciation or depreciation can fluctuate significantly from
period to period. As a result, quarterly comparisons may not be
meaningful. |
|
** |
Percentage change is not meaningful. |
Total Interest and Related Portfolio Income. Total
interest and related portfolio income includes interest and
dividend income, loan prepayment premiums, and fees and other
income.
Interest and dividend income for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004, was composed of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
($ in millions) |
|
| |
|
| |
Interest
|
|
$ |
80.8 |
|
|
$ |
69.9 |
|
Dividends
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
84.9 |
|
|
$ |
73.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The level of interest income, which includes interest paid in
cash and in kind, is directly related to the balance of the
interest-bearing investment portfolio outstanding during the
period multiplied by the weighted average yield. The weighted
average yield varies from period to period based on the current
stated interest on interest-bearing investments and the amount
of loans and debt securities for which interest is not accruing.
The interest-bearing investments in the portfolio at value and
the
53
weighted average yield on the interest-bearing investments in
the portfolio at March 31, 2005 and 2004, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
($ in millions) |
|
| |
|
| |
Interest-bearing portfolio
|
|
$ |
2,357.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,892.0 |
|
Portfolio yield
|
|
|
13.6 |
% |
|
|
14.3 |
% |
Dividend income results from the dividend yield on preferred
equity interests, if any, or the declaration of dividends by a
portfolio company on preferred or common equity interests.
Dividend income will vary from period to period depending upon
the level of yield on our preferred equity interests and the
timing and amount of dividends that are declared by a portfolio
company on preferred or common equity interests. Dividend income
for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, includes
$2.0 million and $2.0 million, respectively, of
dividends from BLX on the Class B equity interests held by us.
The dividends for the three months ended March 31, 2004,
were paid through the issuance of additional Class B equity
interests.
Loan prepayment premiums were $1.7 million and
$1.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005
and 2004, respectively. While the scheduled maturities of
private finance and commercial real estate loans range from five
to ten years, it is not unusual for our borrowers to refinance
or pay off their debts to us ahead of schedule. Therefore, we
generally structure our loans to require a prepayment premium
for the first three to five years of the loan. Accordingly, the
amount of prepayment premiums will vary depending on the level
of repayments and the age of the loans at the time of repayment.
Fees and other income primarily include fees related to
financial structuring, diligence, transaction services,
management services to portfolio companies, guarantees, and
other advisory services. As a business development company, we
are required to make significant managerial assistance available
to the companies in our investment portfolio. Managerial
assistance includes management and consulting services
including, but not limited to, corporate finance, information
technology, marketing, human resources, personnel and board
member recruiting, corporate governance, and risk management.
Fees and other income for the three months ended March 31,
2005 and 2004, included fees relating to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
($ in millions) |
|
| |
|
| |
Structuring and diligence
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
Transaction and other services provided to portfolio companies
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Management services provided to portfolio companies, other
advisory services and guaranty fees
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
Other income
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
8.3 |
|
|
$ |
7.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees and other income are generally related to specific
transactions or services and therefore may vary substantially
from period to period depending on the level and types of
services provided. Loan origination fees that represent yield
enhancement on a loan are capitalized and amortized into
interest income over the life of the loan.
Advantage and BLX were our largest investments at March 31,
2005, and together represented 19.5% of our total assets. Total
interest and related portfolio income earned from Advantage and
BLX for the three months ended March 31, 2005, was
$9.2 million and $7.8 million, respectively. BLX was
our largest investment at March 31, 2004, and represented
11.2% of our total assets. Total interest and related portfolio
income earned from BLX for the three months ended March 31,
2004, was $11.1 million. Total interest and related
portfolio income for the three months ended March 31,
54
2004, included $3.3 million of income earned from Hillman
prior to the sale of our control investment on March 31,
2004, as discussed above.
As outlined above, under the caption Recent
Developments, we completed the sale of our portfolio of
CMBS bonds and CDO bonds and preferred shares on May 3,
2005. Total interest and related portfolio income related to
CMBS and CDO investments for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004, was $23.8 million and
$22.6 million, respectively.
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses include
interest, employee, and administrative expenses. The
fluctuations in interest expense during the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004, were primarily attributable to
changes in the level of our borrowings under various notes
payable and debentures and our revolving line of credit. Our
borrowing activity and weighted average cost of debt, including
fees and closing costs, at and for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At and for the | |
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
($ in millions) |
|
| |
|
| |
Total outstanding debt
|
|
$ |
1,296.4 |
|
|
$ |
962.4 |
|
Average outstanding debt
|
|
$ |
1,125.0 |
|
|
$ |
953.0 |
|
Weighted average
cost(1)
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
(1) |
The weighted average annual interest cost is computed as the (a)
annual stated interest rate on the debt plus the annual
amortization of commitment fees and other facility fees that are
recognized into interest expense over the contractual life of
the respective borrowings, divided by (b) debt outstanding
on the balance sheet date. |
In addition to interest on indebtedness, interest expense
includes interest on our obligations to replenish borrowed
Treasury securities related to our hedging activities of
$0.5 million and $0.9 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Employee expenses include salaries and employee benefits and the
individual performance award and bonus. The change in employee
expense reflects the effect of wage increases, increased
staffing, and the change in mix of employees given their area of
responsibility and relevant experience level. Total employees
were 158 and 133 at March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
In the first quarter of 2004, we established the Individual
Performance Award (IPA) as a long-term incentive compensation
program for certain officers. In conjunction with the program,
the Board has approved a non-qualified deferred compensation
plan (DCP II), which is administered through a trust by an
independent third-party trustee.
The IPA, which will generally be determined annually at the
beginning of each year, is deposited in the trust in four equal
installments, generally on a quarterly basis, in the form of
cash. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
designed the DCP II to require the trustee to use the cash
to purchase shares of our common stock in the open market.
Amounts credited to participants under the DCP II are
immediately vested once deposited by us into the trust. A
participants account shall generally become distributable
only after his or her termination of employment, or in the event
of a change of control of the Company. The Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors may also determine other
distributable events and the timing of such distributions.
For the three months ended March 31, 2005, the IPA expense
was $1.9 million. We contributed these amounts into the
DCP II trust during the first quarter. For the three months
ended March 31, 2004, we accrued $3.5 million in IPA
expense. These amounts were contributed into the DCP II
55
trust in the second quarter of 2004. Because the IPA is deferred
compensation, the cost of this award is not a current expense
for purposes of computing our taxable income. The expense is
deferred for tax purposes until distributions are made from the
trust. The accounts of the DCP II are consolidated with our
accounts. Further, we are required to mark to market the
liability to pay the employees in our stock and this adjustment
is recorded to the IPA compensation expense. The effect of this
adjustment for the three months ended March 31, 2005, was
to increase the individual performance award expense by
$0.1 million, resulting in a total IPA expense of
$2.0 million. The Compensation Committee and the Board of
Directors have determined the IPA for 2005 and it is currently
expected to be approximately $7.5 million.
As a result of recent changes in regulation by the Jobs Creation
Act of 2004 associated with deferred compensation arrangements,
as well as an increase in the competitive market for recruiting
top performers in private equity firms, the Compensation
Committee and the Board of Directors have determined for 2005
that a portion of the IPA should be replaced with an individual
performance bonus (IPB). For the three months ended
March 31, 2005, IPB expense was $1.5 million. The IPB
for 2005 has been determined to be approximately
$7.5 million, and will be distributed in cash to award
recipients in equal bi-weekly installments beginning in February
2005 as long as the recipient remains employed by us. If a
recipient terminates employment during the year, any remaining
cash payments under the IPB would be forfeited.
The total of the IPA and IPB, for the three months ended
March 31, 2005, was $3.5 million. The total IPA and
IPB is currently estimated to be $15.0 million for 2005 before
any mark to market adjustment on the IPA. These amounts are
subject to change if there is a change in the composition of the
pool of award recipients during the year.
Total employee expense related to employees in our commercial
real estate group who we expect will terminate employment in
2005 as a result of the sale of our CMBS and CDO portfolio on
May 3, 2005, was $2.0 million and $1.8 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. See the caption Recent Developments
above.
Administrative expenses include legal and accounting fees,
valuation assistance fees, insurance premiums, the cost of
leases for our headquarters in Washington, DC, and our
regional offices, stock record expenses, directors fees,
and various other expenses. Administrative expenses were
$20.8 million for the three months ended March 31,
2005. This is a $15.0 million increase over administrative
expenses of $5.8 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2004.
Administrative expenses for the three months ended
March 31, 2005, include legal and other fees related to the
response to requests for information in connection with two
government investigations totaling $12.3 million. We expect
that these expenses may remain high and difficult to predict in
the near term as the result of ongoing requests for documents
and information.
The remaining increase in administrative expenses for 2005 over
2004 was primarily due to increased corporate expenses,
including increases in accounting fees, insurance premiums,
valuation assistance fees, and stock record expense of
$1.4 million, increased expenses related to portfolio
development and workout activities of $0.6 million, and
increased rent of $0.3 million associated with the opening
of an office in Los Angeles, CA and expanding our office space
in Chicago, IL and New York, NY.
Realized Gains and Losses. Net realized gains
primarily result from the sale of equity securities associated
with certain private finance investments, the sale of CMBS bonds
and CDO bonds and preferred shares, and the realization of
unamortized discount resulting from the sale and early
56
repayment of private finance loans and commercial mortgage
loans, offset by losses on investments. Net realized gains for
the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the | |
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
($ in millions) |
|
| |
|
| |
Realized gains
|
|
$ |
14.7 |
|
|
$ |
156.0 |
|
Realized losses
|
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gains
|
|
$ |
10.3 |
|
|
$ |
147.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When we exit an investment and realize a gain or loss, we make
an accounting entry to reverse any unrealized appreciation or
depreciation, respectively, we had previously recorded to
reflect the appreciated or depreciated value of the investment.
For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, we
reversed previously recorded unrealized appreciation or
depreciation when gains or losses were realized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three | |
|
|
Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
($ in millions) |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Reversal of previously recorded unrealized appreciation
associated with realized gains
|
|
$ |
(9.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(142.8 |
) |
Reversal of previously recorded unrealized depreciation
associated with realized losses
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reversal
|
|
$ |
(5.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(135.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gains and losses for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004, resulted from various private
finance and commercial real estate finance transactions.
Realized gains for the three months ended March 31, 2005,
primarily resulted from transactions involving five private
finance portfolio companies Polaris Pool Systems,
Inc. ($7.4 million), U.S. Security Holdings, Inc.
($3.3 million), Oriental Trading Company, Inc.
($1.0 million), Woodstream Corporation ($0.9 million),
and DCS Business Services, Inc. ($0.7 million).
Realized gains for the three months ended March 31, 2004,
primarily resulted from transactions involving two private
finance portfolio companies The Hillman Companies,
Inc. ($149.0 million) and CBA-Mezzanine Capital Finance,
LLC ($3.9 million).
Realized losses for the three months ended March 31, 2005,
primarily resulted from one transaction involving a private
finance portfolio company Alderwoods Group, Inc.
($0.8 million) and two transactions involving commercial
mortgage loans ($3.3 million).
Realized losses for the three months ended March 31, 2004,
primarily resulted from transactions involving two private
finance portfolio companies Logic Bay Corporation
($5.7 million) and Sure-Tel, Inc. ($2.3 million).
Change in Unrealized Appreciation or Depreciation.
We determine the value of each investment in our
portfolio on a quarterly basis, and changes in value result in
unrealized appreciation or depreciation being recognized in our
statement of operations. Value, as defined in
Section 2(a)(41) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, is
(i) the market price for those securities for which a
market quotation is readily available and (ii) for all
other securities and assets, fair value is as determined in good
faith by the Board of Directors. Since there is typically no
readily
57
available market value for the investments in our portfolio, we
value substantially all of our portfolio investments at fair
value as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors
pursuant to a valuation policy and a consistently applied
valuation process. At March 31, 2005, portfolio investments
recorded at fair value were approximately 91% of our total
assets. Because of the inherent uncertainty of determining the
fair value of investments that do not have a readily available
market value, the fair value of our investments determined in
good faith by the Board of Directors may differ significantly
from the values that would have been used had a ready market
existed for the investments, and the differences could be
material.
There is no single standard for determining fair value in good
faith. As a result, determining fair value requires that
judgment be applied to the specific facts and circumstances of
each portfolio investment while employing a consistently applied
valuation process for the types of investments we make. Unlike
banks, we are not permitted to provide a general reserve for
anticipated loan losses. Instead, we are required to
specifically value each individual investment on a quarterly
basis. We will record unrealized depreciation on investments
when we believe that an investment has become impaired,
including where collection of a loan or realization of an equity
security is doubtful, or when the enterprise value of the
portfolio company does not currently support the cost of our
debt or equity investment. Enterprise value means the entire
value of the company to a potential buyer, including the sum of
the values of debt and equity securities used to capitalize the
enterprise at a point in time. We will record unrealized
appreciation if we believe that the underlying portfolio company
has appreciated in value and our equity security has also
appreciated in value. Changes in fair value are recorded in the
statement of operations as net change in unrealized appreciation
or depreciation.
As a business development company, we have invested in illiquid
securities including debt and equity securities of companies,
non-investment grade CMBS bonds, and CDO bonds and preferred
shares. The structure of each private finance debt and equity
security is specifically negotiated to enable us to protect our
investment and maximize our returns. We include many terms
governing interest rate, repayment terms, prepayment penalties,
financial covenants, operating covenants, ownership parameters,
dilution parameters, liquidation preferences, voting rights, and
put or call rights. Our investments are generally subject to
restrictions on resale and generally have no established trading
market. Because of the type of investments that we make and the
nature of our business, our valuation process requires an
analysis of various factors. Our fair value methodology includes
the examination of, among other things, the underlying
investment performance, financial condition, and market changing
events that impact valuation.
Valuation Methodology Private Finance. Our
process for determining the fair value of a private finance
investment begins with determining the enterprise value of the
portfolio company. The fair value of our investment is based on
the enterprise value at which the portfolio company could be
sold in an orderly disposition over a reasonable period of time
between willing parties other than in a forced or liquidation
sale. The liquidity event whereby we exit a private finance
investment is generally the sale, the recapitalization or, in
some cases, the initial public offering of the portfolio company.
There is no one methodology to determine enterprise value and,
in fact, for any one portfolio company, enterprise value is best
expressed as a range of fair values, from which we derive a
single estimate of enterprise value. To determine the enterprise
value of a portfolio company, we analyze its historical and
projected financial results. We generally require portfolio
companies to provide annual audited and quarterly unaudited
financial statements, as well as annual projections for the
upcoming fiscal year. Typically in the private equity business,
companies are bought and sold based on multiples of EBITDA, cash
flow, net income, revenues or, in limited instances, book value.
The private equity industry uses financial measures such as
EBITDA or EBITDAM (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes,
Depreciation, Amortization and, in some instances, Management
fees) in order to assess a portfolio
58
companys financial performance and to value a portfolio
company. EBITDA and EBITDAM are not intended to represent cash
flow from operations as defined by U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles and such information should not be
considered as an alternative to net income, cash flow from
operations, or any other measure of performance prescribed by
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. When using EBITDA
to determine enterprise value, we may adjust EBITDA for
non-recurring items. Such adjustments are intended to normalize
EBITDA to reflect the portfolio companys earnings power.
Adjustments to EBITDA may include compensation to previous
owners, acquisition, recapitalization, or restructuring related
items or one-time non-recurring income or expense items.
In determining a multiple to use for valuation purposes, we
generally look to private merger and acquisition statistics,
discounted public trading multiples or industry practices. In
estimating a reasonable multiple, we consider not only the fact
that our portfolio company may be a private company relative to
a peer group of public comparables, but we also consider the
size and scope of our portfolio company and its specific
strengths and weaknesses. In some cases, the best valuation
methodology may be a discounted cash flow analysis based on
future projections. If a portfolio company is distressed, a
liquidation analysis may provide the best indication of
enterprise value.
If there is adequate enterprise value to support the repayment
of our debt, the fair value of our loan or debt security
normally corresponds to cost unless the borrowers
condition or other factors lead to a determination of fair value
at a different amount. The fair value of equity interests in
portfolio companies is determined based on various factors,
including the enterprise value remaining for equity holders
after the repayment of the portfolio companys debt and
other preference capital, and other pertinent factors such as
recent offers to purchase a portfolio company, recent
transactions involving the purchase or sale of the portfolio
companys equity securities, or other liquidation events.
The determined equity values are generally discounted when we
have a minority position, restrictions on resale, specific
concerns about the receptivity of the capital markets to a
specific company at a certain time, or other factors.
As a participant in the private equity business, we invest
primarily in private middle market companies for which there is
generally no publicly available information. Because of the
private nature of these businesses, there is a need to maintain
the confidentiality of the financial and other information that
we have for the private companies in our portfolio. We believe
that maintaining this confidence is important, as disclosure of
such information could disadvantage our portfolio companies and
could put us at a disadvantage in attracting new investments.
Therefore, we do not intend to disclose financial or other
information about our portfolio companies, unless required,
because we believe doing so may put them at an economic or
competitive disadvantage, regardless of our level of ownership
or control.
To balance the lack of publicly available information about our
private portfolio companies, we will continue to work with
independent third-party consultants to obtain assistance in
determining fair value for a portion of the private finance
portfolio each quarter. We work with these consultants to obtain
assistance as additional support in the preparation of our
internal valuation analysis for a portion of the portfolio each
quarter (for all investments with a cost or value greater than
$250,000). In addition, we may receive independent assessments
of a particular private finance portfolio companys value
in the ordinary course of business, most often in the context of
a prospective sale transaction or in the context of a bankruptcy
process. The valuation analysis prepared by management using
these independent valuation resources is submitted to our Board
of Directors for its determination of fair value of the
portfolio in good faith.
At March 31, 2005, S&P Corporate Value Consulting
(S&P CVC) assisted us by reviewing our valuations of BLX and
34 other portfolio companies. Additionally, Houlihan Lokey
Howard and Zukin (Houlihan Lokey) reviewed our valuation of
Advantage. For the remaining quarters in 2005,
59
we intend to continue to obtain valuation assistance from
S&P CVC, Houlihan Lokey and possibly other third parties. We
currently anticipate that we will generally obtain assistance
for all companies in the portfolio that are more than 50% owned
for each of the remaining quarters in 2005 and that we will
generally obtain assistance for companies that are equal to or
less than 50% owned at least once during the course of the year.
Valuation assistance may not be obtained for new companies that
enter the portfolio after June 30 of any calendar year during
that year. We estimate that professional fees for valuation
assistance for all of 2005, including the expense incurred in
the first quarter, will be approximately $1.5 million.
Valuation Methodology CMBS Bonds and CDO Bonds
and Preferred Shares. CMBS bonds and CDO bonds and preferred
shares are carried at fair value, which is based on a discounted
cash flow model that utilizes prepayment and loss assumptions
based on historical experience and projected performance,
economic factors, the characteristics of the underlying cash
flow and comparable yields for similar CMBS bonds and CDO bonds
and preferred shares. Our assumption with regard to discount
rate may be based on the yield of comparable securities, when
available. We recognize unrealized appreciation or depreciation
on our CMBS bonds and CDO bonds and preferred shares as
comparable yields in the market change and/or based on changes
in estimated cash flows resulting from changes in prepayment or
loss assumptions in the underlying collateral pool. As each CMBS
bond ages, the expected amount of losses and the expected timing
of recognition of such losses in the underlying collateral pool
is updated and the revised cash flows are used in determining
the fair value of the bonds. We have determined the fair value
of our CMBS bonds and CDO bonds and preferred shares on an
individual security-by-security basis. If we were to sell a
group of these investments in a pool in one or more
transactions, the total value received for that pool may be
different than the sum of the fair values of the individual
bonds or preferred shares.
Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation or Depreciation.
For the portfolio, net change in unrealized appreciation or
depreciation for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and
2004, consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005(1) | |
|
2004(1) | |
($ in millions) |
|
| |
|
| |
Net unrealized appreciation or depreciation
|
|
$ |
75.7 |
|
|
$ |
(37.0 |
) |
Reversal of previously recorded unrealized appreciation
associated with realized gains
|
|
|
(9.9 |
) |
|
|
(142.8 |
) |
Reversal of previously recorded unrealized depreciation
associated with realized losses
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation
|
|
$ |
70.6 |
|
|
$ |
(172.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation can
fluctuate significantly from period to period. As a result,
quarterly comparisons may not be meaningful. |
For the three months ended March 31, 2005, our two largest
investments were in Advantage and BLX. The following is a
summary of the methodology that we used to determine the fair
value of these investments.
Advantage Sales & Marketing, Inc. We
determined the enterprise value of Advantage by using its
trailing twelve month normalized EBITDA times a multiple. The
multiple we used was consistent with our entry multiple when we
acquired Advantage in June 2004. Using this enterprise
value, we determined the value of our investments in Advantage
to be $353.4 million. Unrealized appreciation on our
investment was $93.1 million at March 31, 2005. This
is an increase in unrealized appreciation in the first quarter
of 2005 of $68.9 million, which has primarily resulted from
an increase in its trailing twelve month normalized EBITDA since
June 2004, related to the realization of integration related
cost savings. Houlihan Lokey assisted us with the valuation of
our investment in Advantage at March 31, 2005. S&P CVC
assisted us with the valuation of our investment in Advantage at
December 31, 2004.
60
Business Loan Express, LLC. To determine the value
of our investment in BLX at March 31, 2005, we performed
four separate valuation analyses to determine a range of values:
(1) analysis of comparable public company trading
multiples, (2) analysis of BLXs value assuming an
initial public offering, (3) analysis of merger and
acquisition transactions for financial services companies, and
(4) a discounted dividend analysis. We received valuation
assistance from S&P CVC for our investment in BLX at
March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004.
With respect to the analysis of comparable public company
trading multiples and the analysis of BLXs value assuming
an initial public offering, we compute a median trailing and
forward price earnings multiple to apply to BLXs pro-forma
net income adjusted for certain capital structure changes that
we believe would likely occur should the company be sold. Each
quarter we evaluate which public commercial finance companies
should be included in the comparable group. The comparable group
at March 31, 2005, was made up of CapitalSource, Inc., CIT
Group, Inc., Financial Federal Corporation, GATX Corporation,
and Marlin Business Services Corporation, which is consistent
with the comparable group at December 31, 2004.
Our investment in BLX at March 31, 2005, was valued at
$330.7 million. This fair value was within the range of
values determined by the four valuation analyses. Unrealized
appreciation on our investment was $48.5 million at
March 31, 2005. This is a decrease in unrealized
appreciation in the first quarter of 2005 of $6.3 million
from December 31, 2004.
OTHER MATTERS
Per Share Amounts. All per share amounts included
in the Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations section have been computed
using the weighted average common shares used to compute diluted
earnings per share, which were 135.6 million and
132.0 million for the three months ended March 31,
2005 and 2004, respectively.
Regulated Investment Company Status. We have
elected to be taxed as a regulated investment company under
Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. As long
as we qualify as a regulated investment company, we are not
taxed on our investment company taxable income or realized net
capital gains, to the extent that such taxable income or gains
are distributed, or deemed to be distributed, to shareholders on
a timely basis.
Taxable income generally differs from net income for financial
reporting purposes due to temporary and permanent differences in
the recognition of income and expenses, and generally excludes
net unrealized appreciation or depreciation, as gains or losses
are not included in taxable income until they are realized. In
addition, gains realized for financial reporting purposes may
differ from gains included in taxable income as a result of our
election to recognize gains using installment sale treatment,
which results in the deferment of gains for tax purposes until
notes received as consideration from the sale of investments are
collected in cash.
Dividends declared and paid by the Company in a year generally
differ from taxable income for that year as such dividends may
include the distribution of current year taxable income, the
distribution of prior year taxable income carried forward into
and distributed in the current year, or returns of capital. We
are generally required to distribute 98% of our taxable income
during the year the income is earned to avoid paying an excise
tax. If this requirement is not met, the Code imposes a
nondeductible excise tax equal to 4% of the amount by which 98%
of the current years taxable income exceeds the
distribution for the year. The taxable income on which an excise
tax is paid is generally carried forward and distributed to
shareholders in the next tax year. Depending on the level of
taxable income earned in a tax year, we may choose to carry
forward taxable income in excess of current year distributions
into the next tax year and pay a 4% excise tax on such income,
as required.
61
In order to maintain our status as a regulated investment
company, we must, in general, (1) continue to qualify as a
business development company; (2) derive at least 90% of
our gross income from dividends, interest, gains from the sale
of securities and other specified types of income; (3) meet
asset diversification requirements as defined in the Internal
Revenue Code; and (4) timely distribute to shareholders at
least 90% of our annual investment company taxable income as
defined in the Internal Revenue Code. We intend to take all
steps necessary to continue to qualify as a regulated investment
company. However, there can be no assurance that we will
continue to qualify for such treatment in future years.
Legal Proceedings. On June 23, 2004, we were
notified by the SEC that they are conducting an informal
investigation of us. On December 22, 2004, we received
letters from the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia
requesting the preservation and production of information
regarding us and Business Loan Express, LLC in connection with a
criminal investigation. Based on the information available to us
at this time, the inquiries appear to pertain to matters related
to portfolio valuation and our portfolio company, Business Loan
Express, LLC. We are cooperating with the SECs and the
U.S. Attorneys investigations.
In addition to the above matters, we are party to certain
lawsuits in the normal course of business.
While the outcome of these legal proceedings and other matters
cannot at this time be predicted with certainty, we do not
expect that the outcome of these matters will have a material
effect upon our financial condition or results of operations.
FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our portfolio has historically generated cash flow from which we
pay dividends to shareholders and fund new investment activity.
Cash generated from the portfolio includes cash flow from net
investment income and net realized gains and principal
collections related to investment repayments or sales. Cash flow
provided by our operating activities before new investment
activity for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and
2004, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$ |
(49.8 |
) |
|
$ |
207.9 |
|
Add: portfolio investments funded
|
|
|
258.0 |
|
|
|
170.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash provided by operating activities before new
investments
|
|
$ |
208.2 |
|
|
$ |
378.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From the cash provided by operating activities before new
investments, we make new portfolio investments, fund our
operating activities, and pay dividends to shareholders. We also
raise new debt and equity capital from time to time in order to
fund our investments and operations.
Dividends to common shareholders for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004, were $76.1 million and
$73.4 million, respectively, or $0.57 per common share for
both quarters. An extra cash dividend of $0.02 per common share
was declared during 2004 and was paid to shareholders on
January 28, 2005.
Dividends are generally determined based upon an estimate of
annual taxable income, which includes our taxable interest,
dividend and fee income, as well as taxable net capital gains.
As discussed above, taxable income generally differs from net
income for financial reporting purposes due to temporary and
permanent differences in the recognition of income and expenses,
and generally excludes net unrealized appreciation or
depreciation, as gains or losses are not included in taxable
62
income until they are realized. Taxable income includes non-cash
income, such as changes in accrued and reinvested interest and
dividends and the amortization of discounts and fees. Cash
collections of income resulting from contractual payment-in-kind
interest or the amortization of discounts and fees generally
occur upon the repayment of the loans or debt securities that
include such items. Non-cash taxable income is reduced by
non-cash expenses, such as realized losses and depreciation and
amortization expense.
Our Board of Directors reviews the dividend rate quarterly, and
may adjust the quarterly dividend throughout the year. Dividends
are declared based upon our estimate of annual taxable income
available for distribution to shareholders. Our goal is to
declare what we believe to be sustainable increases in our
regular quarterly dividends. To the extent that we earn annual
taxable income in excess of dividends paid for the year, we may
spill over the excess taxable income into the next year and such
excess income will be available for distribution in the next
year. Excess taxable income spilled over and paid out in the
next year may be subject to a 4% excise tax (see Other
Matters Regulated Investment Company Status
above). We believe that spilling over excess taxable income into
future periods may provide increased visibility with respect to
taxable earnings available to pay the regular quarterly dividend.
Because we are a regulated investment company, we distribute our
taxable income and, therefore, from time to time we will raise
new debt or equity capital in order to fund our investments and
operations.
At March 31, 2005, and December 31, 2004, our total
assets, total debt outstanding, total shareholders equity,
debt to equity ratio and asset coverage for senior indebtedness
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Total assets
|
|
$ |
3,504.6 |
|
|
$ |
3,261.0 |
|
Total debt outstanding
|
|
$ |
1,296.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,176.6 |
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
$ |
2,033.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,979.8 |
|
Debt to equity ratio
|
|
|
0.64 |
|
|
|
0.59 |
|
Asset coverage
ratio(1)
|
|
|
263 |
% |
|
|
280 |
% |
|
|
(1) |
As a business development company, we are generally required to
maintain a minimum ratio of 200% of total assets to total
borrowings. |
We currently target a debt to equity ratio ranging between
0.50:1.00 to 0.65:1.00. We believe that it is prudent to operate
with a larger equity capital base and less leverage. We did not
raise equity during the three months ended March 31, 2005
or 2004. For the year ended December 31, 2004, we raised
equity of $73.5 million. In addition, shareholders equity
increased by $4.1 million, $18.5 million and
$51.3 million through the exercise of employee options, the
collection of notes receivable from the sale of common stock,
and the issuance of shares through our dividend reinvestment
plan for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004,
and the year ended December 31, 2004.
We employ an asset-liability management strategy that focuses on
matching the estimated maturities of our loan and investment
portfolio to the estimated maturities of our borrowings. We use
our revolving line of credit facility as a means to bridge to
long-term financing in the form of debt or equity capital, which
may or may not result in temporary differences in the matching
of estimated maturities. Availability on the revolving line of
credit, net of amounts committed for standby letters of credit
issued under the line of credit facility, was
$287.2 million on March 31, 2005. We evaluate our
interest rate exposure on an ongoing basis. Generally, we seek
to fund our primarily fixed-rate investment portfolio with
fixed-rate debt or equity capital. To the extent deemed
necessary, we may hedge variable and short-term interest rate
exposure through interest rate swaps or other techniques.
63
At March 31, 2005, we had outstanding debt as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual | |
|
|
Facility | |
|
Amount | |
|
Interest | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Cost(1) | |
($ in millions) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Notes payable and debentures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured notes payable
|
|
$ |
980.9 |
|
|
$ |
980.9 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
SBA debentures
|
|
|
53.8 |
|
|
|
46.5 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
OPIC loan
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total notes payable and debentures
|
|
|
1,040.4 |
|
|
|
1,033.1 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
Revolving line of credit
|
|
|
587.5 |
|
|
|
263.3 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
% (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$ |
1,627.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,296.4 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
%(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The weighted average annual interest cost is computed as the
(a) annual stated interest on the debt plus the annual
amortization of commitment fees and other facility fees that are
recognized into interest expense over the contractual life of
the respective borrowings, divided by (b) debt outstanding
on the balance sheet date. |
|
(2) |
The current interest rate payable on the revolving line of
credit was 4.4% at March 31, 2005, which excluded the
annual cost of commitment fees and other facility fees of
$3.3 million. The annual cost of commitment fees and other
facility fees of $3.3 million at March 31, 2005,
include the extension fee of $1.8 million that we paid on
April 18, 2005, as discussed below. The annual interest
cost for total debt includes the annual cost of commitment fees
and other facility fees on the revolving line of credit
regardless of the amount outstanding on the facility as of the
balance sheet date. |
Unsecured Notes Payable. We have issued long-term
debt to institutional lenders, primarily insurance companies.
The notes have five- or seven-year maturities, with maturity
dates beginning in 2005 and generally have fixed rates of
interest. The notes generally require payment of interest only
semi-annually, and all principal is due upon maturity.
We have issued five-year unsecured long-term notes denominated
in Euros and Sterling for a total U.S. dollar equivalent of
$15.2 million. The notes have fixed interest rates and have
substantially the same terms as our existing unsecured long-term
notes. Simultaneous with issuing the notes, we entered into a
cross currency swap with a financial institution which fixed our
interest and principal payments in U.S. dollars for the life of
the debt.
Small Business Administration Debentures. We,
through our small business investment company subsidiary, have
debentures payable to the Small Business Administration with
contractual maturities of ten years. The notes require payment
of interest only semi-annually, and all principal is due upon
maturity. During the first quarter of 2005, we repaid
$31.0 million of this outstanding debt. Under the small
business investment company program, we may borrow up to
$119.0 million from the Small Business Administration. At
March 31, 2005, we had a commitment from the Small Business
Administration to borrow up to an additional $7.3 million
above the current amount outstanding. The commitment expires on
September 30, 2005.
Revolving Line of Credit. We increased the
committed amount on the unsecured revolving line of credit to
$587.5 million during the first quarter of 2005. The
committed amount may be further expanded through new or
additional commitments up to $600 million at our option. In
addition, during the second quarter of 2005, we exercised our
option to extend the maturity for one additional year from the
expiration date of April 2005 under substantially similar terms.
In connection with the extension, we paid an extension fee of
0.3% on the existing commitments. In addition, the interest rate
on outstanding borrowings will increase by 0.5% during the
extension period.
After the extension notice, the credit facility generally bears
interest at a rate, at our option, equal to (i) the
one-month LIBOR plus 2.00%, (ii) the Bank of America, N.A.
cost of funds plus 2.00% or (iii) the higher of the Bank of
America, N.A. prime rate or the Federal Funds rate plus 1.00%.
The line of credit generally requires monthly payments of
interest, and all principal is due upon maturity.
64
Outstanding borrowings on the unsecured revolving line of credit
at March 31, 2005, were $263.3 million. The amount
available under the line at March 31, 2005, was
$287.2 million, net of amounts committed for standby
letters of credit of $37.1 million. Net borrowings under
the revolving line of credit for the three months ended
March 31, 2005, were $151.3 million.
In connection with the sale of CMBS and CDO assets, as outlined
above under the caption Recent Developments,
outstanding borrowings under the revolving line of credit were
repaid subsequent to March 31, 2005.
We have various financial and operating covenants required by
the revolving line of credit and notes payable and debentures.
These covenants require us to maintain certain financial ratios,
including debt to equity and interest coverage, and a minimum
net worth. Our credit facilities limit our ability to declare
dividends if we default under certain provisions. As of
March 31, 2005, we were in compliance with these covenants.
The following table shows our significant contractual
obligations for the repayment of debt and payment of other
contractual obligations as of March 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due By Year | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
After | |
|
|
Total | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
2009 | |
($ in millions) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Notes payable and debentures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured long-term notes payable
|
|
$ |
980.9 |
|
|
$ |
165.0 |
|
|
$ |
175.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
153.0 |
|
|
$ |
268.4 |
|
|
$ |
219.5 |
|
|
SBA debentures
|
|
|
46.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.5 |
|
|
OPIC loan
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving line of
credit(1)
|
|
|
263.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
33.5 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$ |
1,329.9 |
|
|
$ |
169.6 |
|
|
$ |
448.5 |
|
|
$ |
4.4 |
|
|
$ |
157.4 |
|
|
$ |
273.0 |
|
|
$ |
277.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
As discussed above, we exercised our option to extend the
maturity of the revolving line of credit to April 2006. At
March 31, 2005, $287.2 million remained unused and
available, net of amounts committed for standby letters of
credit of $37.1 million issued under the credit facility. |
The following table shows our contractual commitments that may
have the effect of creating, increasing, or accelerating our
liabilities as of March 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Year | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
After | |
|
|
Total | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
2009 | |
($ in millions) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Guarantees
|
|
$ |
109.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
104.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
Standby letters of
credit(1)
|
|
|
37.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commitments
|
|
$ |
146.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
38.0 |
|
|
$ |
104.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
2.5 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Standby letters of credit are issued under our revolving line of
credit. As discussed above, we exercised our option to extend
the maturity of the revolving line of credit to April 2006.
Therefore, unless a standby letter of credit is set to expire at
an earlier date, we have assumed that the standby letters of
credit will expire contemporaneously with the expiration of our
line of credit in April 2006. |
In addition, we had outstanding commitments to fund investments
totaling $360.7 million at March 31, 2005. We intend
to fund these commitments and prospective investment
opportunities with existing cash, through cash flow from
operations before new investments, through borrowings under our
line of credit or other long-term debt agreements, or through
the sale or issuance of new equity capital.
65
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The consolidated financial statements are based on the selection
and application of critical accounting policies, which require
management to make significant estimates and assumptions.
Critical accounting policies are those that are both important
to the presentation of our financial condition and results of
operations and require managements most difficult,
complex, or subjective judgments. Our critical accounting
policies are those applicable to the valuation of investments
and certain revenue recognition matters as discussed below.
Valuation of Portfolio Investments. As
a business development company, we invest in illiquid securities
including debt and equity securities of companies,
non-investment grade CMBS, and the bonds and preferred shares of
CDOs. Our investments are generally subject to restrictions on
resale and generally have no established trading market. We
value substantially all of our investments at fair value as
determined in good faith by the Board of Directors in accordance
with our valuation policy. We determine fair value to be the
amount for which an investment could be exchanged in an orderly
disposition over a reasonable period of time between willing
parties other than in a forced or liquidation sale. Our
valuation policy considers the fact that no ready market exists
for substantially all of the securities in which we invest. Our
valuation policy is intended to provide a consistent basis for
determining the fair value of the portfolio. We will record
unrealized depreciation on investments when we believe that an
investment has become impaired, including where collection of a
loan or realization of an equity security is doubtful, or when
the enterprise value of the portfolio company does not currently
support the cost of our debt or equity investments. Enterprise
value means the entire value of the company to a potential
buyer, including the sum of the values of debt and equity
securities used to capitalize the enterprise at a point in time.
We will record unrealized appreciation if we believe that the
underlying portfolio company has appreciated in value and our
equity security has also appreciated in value. The value of
investments in publicly traded securities is determined using
quoted market prices discounted for restrictions on resale, if
any.
Loans and Debt Securities. For loans
and debt securities, fair value generally approximates cost
unless the borrowers enterprise value, overall financial
condition or other factors lead to a determination of fair value
at a different amount.
When we receive nominal cost warrants or free equity securities
(nominal cost equity), we allocate our cost basis in
our investment between debt securities and nominal cost equity
at the time of origination. At that time, the original issue
discount basis of the nominal cost equity is recorded by
increasing the cost basis in the equity and decreasing the cost
basis in the related debt securities.
Interest income is recorded on an accrual basis to the extent
that such amounts are expected to be collected. For loans and
debt securities with contractual payment-in-kind interest, which
represents contractual interest accrued and added to the loan
balance that generally becomes due at maturity, we will not
accrue payment-in-kind interest if the portfolio company
valuation indicates that the payment-in-kind interest is not
collectible. Interest on loans and debt securities is not
accrued if we have doubt about interest collection. Loans in
workout status that are classified as Grade 4 or 5
assets under our internal grading system do not accrue interest.
In addition, interest may not accrue on loans or debt securities
to portfolio companies that are more than 50% owned by us
depending on such companys capital requirements. Loan
origination fees, original issue discount, and market discount
are capitalized and then amortized into interest income using
the effective interest method. Upon the prepayment of a loan or
debt security, any unamortized loan origination fees are
recorded as interest income and any unamortized original issue
discount or market discount is recorded as a realized gain.
Prepayment premiums are recorded on loans and debt securities
when received.
Equity Securities. Our equity
interests in portfolio companies for which there is no liquid
public market are valued at fair value based on the enterprise
value of the portfolio company, which
66
is determined using various factors, including cash flow from
operations of the portfolio company and other pertinent factors,
such as recent offers to purchase a portfolio company, recent
transactions involving the purchase or sale of the portfolio
companys equity securities, or other liquidation events.
The determined equity values are generally discounted to account
for restrictions on resale or minority ownership positions.
The value of our equity interests in public companies for which
market quotations are readily available is based on the closing
public market price on the balance sheet date. Securities that
carry certain restrictions on sale are typically valued at a
discount from the public market value of the security.
Dividend income is recorded on preferred equity securities on an
accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be
collected, and on common equity securities on the record date
for private companies or on the ex-dividend date for publicly
traded companies.
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities (CMBS) and
Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDO). CMBS bonds and
CDO bonds and preferred shares are carried at fair value, which
is based on a discounted cash flow model that utilizes
prepayment and loss assumptions based on historical experience
and projected performance, economic factors, the characteristics
of the underlying cash flow, and comparable yields for similar
CMBS bonds and CDO bonds and preferred shares, when available.
We recognize unrealized appreciation or depreciation on our CMBS
bonds and CDO bonds and preferred shares as comparable yields in
the market change and/or based on changes in estimated cash
flows resulting from changes in prepayment or loss assumptions
in the underlying collateral pool. We have determined the fair
value of our CMBS bonds and CDO bonds and preferred shares on an
individual security-by-security basis. If we were to sell a
group of these investments in a pool in one or more
transactions, the total value received for that pool may be
different than the sum of the fair values of the individual
bonds or preferred shares.
We recognize income from the amortization of original issue
discount using the effective interest method, using the
anticipated yield over the projected life of the investment.
Yields are revised when there are changes in actual and
estimated prepayment speeds or actual and estimated credit
losses. Changes in estimated yield are recognized as an
adjustment to the estimated yield over the remaining life of the
CMBS bonds and CDO bonds and preferred shares from the date the
estimated yield is changed.
Net Realized Gains or Losses and Net Change in Unrealized
Appreciation or Depreciation. Realized gains or losses
are measured by the difference between the net proceeds from the
repayment or sale and the cost basis of the investment without
regard to unrealized appreciation or depreciation previously
recognized, and include investments charged off during the year,
net of recoveries. Net change in unrealized appreciation or
depreciation reflects the change in portfolio investment values
during the reporting period, including the reversal of
previously recorded unrealized appreciation or depreciation when
gains or losses are realized.
Fee Income. Fee income includes fees for
guarantees and services rendered by us to portfolio companies
and other third parties such as diligence, structuring,
transaction services, management services, and other advisory
services. Guaranty fees are recognized as income over the
related period of the guaranty. Diligence, structuring, and
transaction services fees are generally recognized as income
when services are rendered or when the related transactions are
completed. Management and other advisory services fees are
generally recognized as income as the services are rendered.
67
RISK FACTORS
Investing in Allied Capital involves a number of significant
risks relating to our business and investment objective. As a
result, there can be no assurance that we will achieve our
investment objective.
Our portfolio of investments is illiquid. We generally
acquire our investments directly from the issuer in privately
negotiated transactions. The majority of the investments in our
portfolio are typically subject to restrictions on resale or
otherwise have no established trading market. We typically exit
our investments when the portfolio company has a liquidity event
such as a sale, recapitalization, or initial public offering of
the company. The illiquidity of our investments may adversely
affect our ability to dispose of debt and equity securities at
times when it may be otherwise advantageous for us to liquidate
such investments. In addition, if we were forced to immediately
liquidate some or all of the investments in the portfolio, the
proceeds of such liquidation would be significantly less than
the current value of such investments.
Investing in private companies involves a high degree of
risk. Our portfolio consists of primarily long-term loans to
and investments in private companies. Investments in private
businesses involve a high degree of business and financial risk,
which can result in substantial losses and accordingly should be
considered speculative. There is generally no publicly available
information about the companies in which we invest, and we rely
significantly on the diligence of our employees and agents to
obtain information in connection with our investment decisions.
In addition, these businesses generally have narrower product
lines and market shares than their competition and may be more
vulnerable to customer preferences, market conditions, loss of
key personnel, or economic downturns, which may adversely affect
the return on, or the recovery of, our investment in such
businesses.
Substantially all of our portfolio investments are recorded
at fair value as determined in good faith by our Board of
Directors and, as a result, there is uncertainty regarding the
value of our portfolio investments. At March 31, 2005,
portfolio investments recorded at fair value were approximately
91% of our total assets. Pursuant to the requirements of the
1940 Act, we value substantially all of our investments at fair
value as determined in good faith by our Board of Directors on a
quarterly basis. Since there is typically no readily available
market value for the investments in our portfolio, our Board of
Directors determines in good faith the fair value of these
investments pursuant to a valuation policy and a consistently
applied valuation process.
There is no single standard for determining fair value in good
faith. As a result, determining fair value requires that
judgment be applied to the specific facts and circumstances of
each portfolio investment while employing a consistently applied
valuation process for the types of investments we make. Unlike
banks, we are not permitted to provide a general reserve for
anticipated loan losses; we are instead required by the 1940 Act
to specifically value each individual investment on a quarterly
basis and record unrealized depreciation for an investment that
we believe has become impaired, including where collection of a
loan or realization of an equity security is doubtful, or when
the enterprise value of the portfolio company does not currently
support the cost of our debt or equity investment. Enterprise
value means the entire value of the company to a potential
buyer, including the sum of the values of debt and equity
securities used to capitalize the enterprise at a point in time.
We will record unrealized appreciation if we believe that the
underlying portfolio company has appreciated in value and our
equity security has also appreciated in value. Without a readily
available market value and because of the inherent uncertainty
of valuation, the fair value of our investments determined in
good faith by the Board of Directors may differ significantly
from the values that would have been used had a ready market
existed for the investments, and the differences could be
material.
68
We adjust quarterly the valuation of our portfolio to reflect
the Board of Directors determination of the fair value of
each investment in our portfolio. Any changes in fair value are
recorded in our statement of operations as net change in
unrealized appreciation or depreciation.
Economic recessions or downturns could impair our portfolio
companies and harm our operating results. Many of the
companies in which we have made or will make investments may be
susceptible to economic slowdowns or recessions. An economic
slowdown may affect the ability of a company to engage in a
liquidity event such as a sale, recapitalization, or initial
public offering. Our nonperforming assets are likely to increase
and the value of our portfolio is likely to decrease during
these periods. These conditions could lead to financial losses
in our portfolio and a decrease in our revenues, net income, and
assets.
Our business of making private equity investments and
positioning them for liquidity events also may be affected by
current and future market conditions. The absence of an active
senior lending environment or a slow down in middle market
merger and acquisition activity may slow the amount of private
equity investment activity generally. As a result, the pace of
our investment activity may slow. In addition, significant
changes in the capital markets could have an effect on the
valuations of private companies and on the potential for
liquidity events involving such companies. This could affect the
timing of exit events in our portfolio and could negatively
affect the amount of gains or losses upon exit.
Our borrowers may default on their payments, which may have a
negative effect on our financial performance. We make
long-term unsecured, subordinated loans and invest in equity
securities, which may involve a higher degree of repayment risk.
We primarily invest in companies that may have limited financial
resources and that may be unable to obtain financing from
traditional sources. Numerous factors may affect a
borrowers ability to repay its loan, including the failure
to meet its business plan, a downturn in its industry, or
negative economic conditions. Deterioration in a borrowers
financial condition and prospects may be accompanied by
deterioration in any related collateral and may have a negative
effect on our financial results.
Our private finance investments may not produce current
returns or capital gains. Our private finance investments
are typically structured as unsecured debt securities with a
relatively high fixed rate of interest and with equity features
such as conversion rights, warrants, or options. As a result,
our private finance investments are generally structured to
generate interest income from the time they are made and may
also produce a realized gain from an accompanying equity
feature. We cannot be sure that our portfolio will generate a
current return or capital gains.
Our financial results could be negatively affected if a
significant portfolio investment fails to perform as
expected. We purchase controlling equity positions in
companies and our total debt and equity investment in controlled
companies may be significant individually or in the aggregate.
Investments in controlled portfolio companies are generally
larger and in fewer companies than our investments in companies
that we do not control. As a result, if a significant investment
in one or more controlled companies fails to perform as
expected, our financial results could be more negatively
affected and the magnitude of the loss could be more significant
than if we had made smaller investments in more companies. At
March 31, 2005, our largest investments were in Advantage
Sales & Marketing, Inc. and Business Loan Express, LLC
and represented 10.1% and 9.4% of our total assets,
respectively, and 9.7% and 8.2% of our total interest and
related portfolio income, respectively.
Our financial results could be negatively affected if
Business Loan Express fails to perform as expected. Business
Loan Express, LLC (BLX) is one of our largest portfolio
investments. Our financial results could be negatively affected
if BLX, as a portfolio company, fails to perform as
69
expected or if government funding for, or regulations related to
the Small Business Administration 7(a) Guaranteed Loan
Program change.
Investments in non-investment grade commercial
mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations
may be illiquid, may have a higher risk of default, and may not
produce current returns. The commercial mortgage-backed
securities and collateralized debt obligation bonds and
preferred shares in which we invest are not investment grade,
which means that nationally recognized statistical rating
organizations rate them below the top four investment-grade
rating categories (i.e., AAA through
BBB), and are sometimes referred to as junk
bonds. Non-investment grade commercial mortgage-backed
securities and collateralized debt obligation bonds and
preferred shares tend to be less liquid, may have a higher risk
of default and may be more difficult to value. Non-investment
grade securities usually provide a higher yield than do
investment grade securities, but with the higher return comes
greater risk of default. In addition, the fair value of these
securities may change as interest rates change over time.
Economic recessions or downturns may cause defaults or losses on
collateral securing these securities to increase. Non-investment
grade securities are considered speculative, and their capacity
to pay principal and interest in accordance with the terms of
their issue is not ensured.
We borrow money, which magnifies the potential for gain or
loss on amounts invested and may increase the risk of investing
in us. Borrowings, also known as leverage, magnify the
potential for gain or loss on amounts invested and, therefore,
increase the risks associated with investing in our securities.
We borrow from and issue senior debt securities to banks,
insurance companies, and other lenders. Lenders of these senior
securities have fixed dollar claims on our consolidated assets
that are superior to the claims of our common shareholders. If
the value of our consolidated assets increases, then leveraging
would cause the net asset value attributable to our common stock
to increase more sharply than it would have had we not
leveraged. Conversely, if the value of our consolidated assets
decreases, leveraging would cause net asset value to decline
more sharply than it otherwise would have had we not leveraged.
Similarly, any increase in our consolidated income in excess of
consolidated interest payable on the borrowed funds would cause
our net income to increase more than it would without the
leverage, while any decrease in our consolidated income would
cause net income to decline more sharply than it would have had
we not borrowed. Such a decline could negatively affect our
ability to make common stock dividend payments. Leverage is
generally considered a speculative investment technique.
At March 31, 2005, we had $1,296.4 million of
outstanding indebtedness bearing a weighted average annual
interest cost of 6.4%. In order for us to cover these annual
interest payments on indebtedness, we must achieve annual
returns on our assets of at least 2.4%.
We may not borrow money unless we maintain asset coverage for
indebtedness of at least 200%, which may affect returns to
shareholders. We must maintain asset coverage for total
borrowings of at least 200%. Our ability to achieve our
investment objective may depend in part on our continued ability
to maintain a leveraged capital structure by borrowing from
banks, insurance companies or other lenders on favorable terms.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain such
leverage. If asset coverage declines to less than 200%, we may
be required to sell a portion of our investments when it is
disadvantageous to do so. As of March 31, 2005, our asset
coverage for senior indebtedness was 263%.
Changes in interest rates may affect our cost of capital and
net investment income. Because we borrow money to make
investments, our net investment income is dependent upon the
difference between the rate at which we borrow funds and the
rate at which we invest these funds. As a result, there can be
no assurance that a significant change in market interest rates
will not have a material adverse effect on our net investment
income. In periods of rising interest rates, our cost of funds
70
would increase, which would reduce our net investment income. We
use a combination of long-term and short-term borrowings and
equity capital to finance our investing activities. We utilize
our revolving line of credit as a means to bridge to long-term
financing. Our long-term fixed-rate investments are financed
primarily with long-term fixed-rate debt and equity. We may use
interest rate risk management techniques in an effort to limit
our exposure to interest rate fluctuations. Such techniques may
include various interest rate hedging activities to the extent
permitted by the 1940 Act. We have analyzed the potential impact
of changes in interest rates on interest income net of interest
expense.
Assuming that the balance sheet were to remain constant and no
actions were taken to alter the existing interest rate
sensitivity, a hypothetical immediate 1% change in interest
rates would have affected the net income by less than 1% over a
one year horizon. Although management believes that this measure
is indicative of our sensitivity to interest rate changes, it
does not adjust for potential changes in credit quality, size
and composition of the assets on the balance sheet and other
business developments that could affect net increase in net
assets resulting from operations, or net income. Accordingly, no
assurances can be given that actual results would not differ
materially from the potential outcome simulated by this estimate.
We will continue to need additional capital to grow because
we must distribute our income. We will continue to need
capital to fund growth in our investments. Historically, we have
borrowed from financial institutions and have issued equity
securities to grow our portfolio. A reduction in the
availability of new debt or equity capital could limit our
ability to grow. We must distribute at least 90% of our taxable
ordinary income, which excludes realized net long-term capital
gains, to our shareholders to maintain our regulated investment
company status. As a result, such earnings will not be available
to fund investment originations. In addition, as a business
development company, we are generally required to maintain a
ratio of at least 200% of total assets to total borrowings,
which may restrict our ability to borrow in certain
circumstances. We expect to continue to borrow from financial
institutions and issue additional debt and equity securities. If
we fail to obtain funds from such sources or from other sources
to fund our investments, it could limit our ability to grow,
which could have a material adverse effect on the value of our
common stock.
Loss of regulated investment company tax treatment would
substantially reduce net assets and income available for
dividends. We have operated so as to qualify as a regulated
investment company under Subchapter M of the Code. If we
meet source of income, asset diversification, and distribution
requirements, we will not be subject to corporate level income
taxation on income we timely distribute to our stockholders as
dividends. We would cease to qualify for such tax treatment if
we were unable to comply with these requirements. In addition,
we may have difficulty meeting the requirement to make
distributions to our shareholders because in certain cases we
may recognize income before or without receiving cash
representing such income. If we fail to qualify as a regulated
investment company, we will have to pay corporate-level taxes on
all of our income whether or not we distribute it, which would
substantially reduce the amount of income available for
distribution to our stockholders. Even if we qualify as a
regulated investment company, we generally will be subject to a
corporate-level income tax on the income we do not distribute.
Moreover, if we do not distribute at least 98% of our annual
taxable income in the year earned, we generally will be subject
to a 4% excise tax on such income carried forward and
distributed in the next tax year.
There is a risk that you may not receive dividends or
distributions. We intend to make distributions on a
quarterly basis to our stockholders. We may not be able to
achieve operating results that will allow us to make
distributions at a specific level or to increase the amount of
these distributions from time to time. In addition, due to the
asset coverage test applicable to us as a business development
company, we may be limited in our ability to make distributions.
Also, our credit facilities limit our ability to declare
dividends if we default under certain provisions. If we do
71
not distribute a certain percentage of our income annually, we
will suffer adverse tax consequences, including possible loss of
our status as a regulated investment company. In addition, in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
and tax regulations, we include in income certain amounts that
we have not yet received in cash, such as contractual
payment-in-kind interest which represents contractual interest
added to the loan balance that becomes due at the end of the
loan term. The increases in loan balances as a result of
contractual payment-in-kind arrangements are included in income
in advance of receiving cash payment and are separately included
in the change in accrued or reinvested interest and dividends in
our consolidated statement of cash flows. Since we may recognize
income before or without receiving cash representing such
income, we may have difficulty meeting the requirement to
distribute at least 90% of our investment company taxable income
to maintain our status as a regulated investment company.
We operate in a competitive market for investment
opportunities. We compete for investments with a large
number of private equity funds and mezzanine funds, other
business development companies, investment banks, other equity
and non-equity based investment funds, and other sources of
financing, including specialty finance companies and traditional
financial services companies such as commercial banks. Some of
our competitors may have greater resources than we do. Increased
competition would make it more difficult for us to purchase or
originate investments at attractive prices. As a result of this
competition, sometimes we may be precluded from making otherwise
attractive investments.
Our business depends on our key personnel. We depend on
the continued services of our executive officers and other key
management personnel. If we were to lose any of these officers
or other management personnel, such a loss could result in
inefficiencies in our operations and lost business
opportunities, which could have a negative effect on our
business.
Changes in the law or regulations that govern us could have a
material impact on us or our operations. We are regulated by
the SEC and the Small Business Administration. In addition,
changes in the laws or regulations that govern business
development companies, regulated investment companies, real
estate investment trusts, and small business investment
companies may significantly affect our business. Any change in
the law or regulations that govern our business could have a
material impact on us or our operations. Laws and regulations
may be changed from time to time, and the interpretations of the
relevant laws and regulations also are subject to change, which
may have a material effect on our operations.
Our ability to invest in private companies may be limited in
certain circumstances. If we are to maintain our status as a
business development company, we must not acquire any assets
other than qualifying assets unless, at the time of
and after giving effect to such acquisition, at least 70% of our
total assets are qualifying assets. If we acquire debt or equity
securities from an issuer that has outstanding marginable
securities at the time we make an investment, these acquired
assets cannot be treated as qualifying assets. This result is
dictated by the definition of eligible portfolio
company under the 1940 Act, which in part looks to whether
a company has outstanding marginable securities.
Amendments promulgated in 1998 by the Federal Reserve expanded
the definition of a marginable security under the Federal
Reserves margin rules to include any non-equity security.
Thus, any debt securities issued by any entity are marginable
securities under the Federal Reserves current margin
rules. As a result, the staff of the SEC has raised the question
as to whether a private company that has outstanding debt
securities would qualify as an eligible portfolio
company under the 1940 Act.
Until the question raised by the staff of the SEC pertaining to
the Federal Reserves 1998 change to its margin rules has
been addressed by legislative, administrative or judicial
action, we
72
intend to treat as qualifying assets only those debt and equity
securities that are issued by a private company that has no
marginable securities outstanding at the time we purchase such
securities or those that otherwise qualify as an eligible
portfolio company under the 1940 Act.
The SEC has recently issued proposed rules to correct the
unintended consequence of the Federal Reserves 1998 margin
rule amendments of apparently limiting the investment
opportunities of business development companies. In general, the
SECs proposed rules would define an eligible portfolio
company as any company that does not have securities listed on a
national securities exchange or association. We are currently in
the process of reviewing the SECs proposed rules and
assessing its impact, to the extent such proposed rules are
subsequently approved by the SEC, on our investment activities.
We do not believe that these proposed rules will have a material
adverse effect on our operations.
Results may fluctuate and may not be indicative of future
performance. Our operating results may fluctuate and,
therefore, you should not rely on current or historical period
results to be indicative of our performance in future reporting
periods. Factors that could cause operating results to fluctuate
include, but are not limited to, variations in the investment
origination volume and fee income earned, variation in timing of
prepayments, variations in and the timing of the recognition of
net realized gains or losses and changes in unrealized
appreciation or depreciation, the degree to which we encounter
competition in our markets, and general economic conditions.
Our common stock price may be volatile. The trading price
of our common stock may fluctuate substantially. The price of
the common stock may be higher or lower than the price you pay
for your shares, depending on many factors, some of which are
beyond our control and may not be directly related to our
operating performance. These factors include, but are not
limited to, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from
time to time; |
|
|
|
significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of
securities of business development companies or other financial
services companies; |
|
|
|
volatility resulting from trading in derivative securities
related to our common stock including puts, calls, long-term
equity anticipation securities, or LEAPs, or short trading
positions; |
|
|
|
changes in regulatory policies or tax guidelines with respect to
business development companies or regulated investment companies; |
|
|
|
actual or anticipated changes in our earnings or fluctuations in
our operating results or changes in the expectations of
securities analysts; |
|
|
|
general economic conditions and trends; |
|
|
|
loss of a major funding source; or |
|
|
|
departures of key personnel. |
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk
There has been no material change in quantitative or qualitative
disclosures about market risk since December 31, 2004.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly
report on Form 10-Q, the Companys chief executive
officer and chief financial officer conducted an evaluation of
the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 of the Securities
Exchange Act of
73
1934). Based upon this evaluation, the Companys chief
executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective
in timely alerting them of any material information relating to
the Company that is required to be disclosed by the Company in
the reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934.
(b) There have been no changes in the Companys
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the quarter ended March 31, 2005, that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Companys internal control over financial reporting.
74
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal
Proceedings
On June 23, 2004, we were notified by the SEC that they are
conducting an informal investigation of us. On December 22,
2004, we received letters from the U.S. Attorney for the
District of Columbia requesting the preservation and production
of information regarding us and Business Loan Express, LLC in
connection with a criminal investigation. Based on the
information available to us at this time, the inquiries appear
to pertain to matters related to portfolio valuation and our
portfolio company, Business Loan Express, LLC. We are
cooperating with the SECs and the U.S. Attorneys
investigations.
On May 28, 2004, Ferolie Corporation, a food broker with
business and contractual relationships with an entity that is
now affiliated with one of our portfolio companies, Advantage
Sales & Marketing Inc., filed suit against us,
Advantage Sales & Marketing and the affiliated entity in the
United States District Court for the District of Columbia
alleging that, among other things, we and Advantage Sales &
Marketing had tortiously interfered with Ferolies contract
with the affiliated entity by causing the affiliated entity
(i) to breach its obligations to Ferolie regarding
Ferolies participation in a reorganization transaction
involving the affiliated entity and (ii) to induce clients
of Ferolie to transfer their business to the affiliated entity.
Ferolie sought actual and punitive damages against us and
Advantage Sales & Marketing and declaratory and
injunctive relief. On July 15, 2004, the United States
District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed the
lawsuit for lack of jurisdiction. On August 17, 2004,
Ferolie filed a Petition to Compel Arbitration in
the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Illinois naming us, Advantage Sales & Marketing and the
affiliated entity as respondents. Ferolie attached to its
petition an Amended Demand for Arbitration and Statement
of Claims that asserts essentially the same claims as were
asserted in the lawsuit that was dismissed by the United States
District Court for the District of Columbia. On October 29,
2004, the United States District Court for the Northern District
of Illinois dismissed Ferolies petition after finding that
Ferolie had failed to adequately allege the existence of subject
matter jurisdiction.
On November 4, 2004, Ferolie refiled its Petition to
Compel Arbitration in the Circuit Court of Cook County,
Illinois. The allegations and relief requested in this
proceeding are identical to the assertions made by Ferolie in
the two previously dismissed proceedings. On February 15,
2005, the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois entered an
order denying Ferolies motion for an order compelling the
Company to arbitrate the claims asserted by Ferolie against it.
In the same order, the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois
granted Ferolies motion to compel arbitration of the
claims asserted against Advantage Sales & Marketing and the
affiliated entity and the arbitration is proceeding. Allied is
not a party to the arbitration.
In addition to the above matters, we are party to certain
lawsuits in the normal course of business.
While the outcome of these legal proceedings and other matters
cannot at this time be predicted with certainty, we do not
expect that the outcome of these matters will have a material
effect upon our financial condition or results of operations.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity
Securities and Use of Proceeds
During the three months ended March 31, 2005, we issued a
total of 55,262 shares of common stock under our dividend
reinvestment plan pursuant to an exemption from the registration
requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. The aggregate
offering price for the shares of common stock sold under the
dividend reinvestment plan was approximately $1.4 million.
On February 15, 2005, we issued 279,720 shares of our
common stock in connection with Mercury Air Center, Inc.s
acquisition of Corporate Wings. Such shares were issued pursuant
to an
75
exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities
Act of 1933 under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act or
Regulation D promulgated thereunder as transactions by an
issuer not involving any public offering.
The following table provides information as of and for the
quarter ended March 31, 2005, regarding shares of our
common stock that were purchased under our Non-Qualified
Deferred Compensation Plan I (DCP I) and Non-Qualified
Deferred Compensation Plan II (DCP II), which are
administered by independent third-party trustees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number | |
|
|
|
|
of Shares | |
|
Average Price | |
|
|
Purchased | |
|
Paid Per Share | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
DCP
I(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/1/2005 to 1/31/2005
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
26.97 |
|
|
2/1/2005 to 2/28/2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/1/2005 to 3/31/2005
|
|
|
1,045 |
|
|
$ |
26.60 |
|
DCP
II(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/1/2005 to 1/31/2005
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
$ |
26.43 |
|
|
2/1/2005 to 2/28/2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3/1/2005 to 3/31/2005
|
|
|
69,398 |
|
|
$ |
26.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
70,819 |
|
|
$ |
26.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The DCP I is an unfunded plan, as defined by the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, that provides for the deferral of
compensation by our directors, employees, and consultants. Our
directors, employees, or consultants are eligible to participate
in the plan at such time and for such period as designated by
the Board of Directors. The DCP I is administered through a
trust by an independent third-party trustee, and we fund this
plan through cash contributions. Directors may choose to defer
directors fees through the DCP I, and may choose to
invest such deferred income in shares of our common stock. To
the extent a director elects to invest in our common stock, the
trustee of the DCP I will be required to use such deferred
directors fees to purchase shares of our common stock in
the market. |
|
(2) |
We have established a long-term incentive compensation program
whereby we will generally determine an individual performance
award for certain officers annually at the beginning of each
year. In conjunction with the program, we instituted the
DCP II, which is an unfunded plan (as defined by the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986) that is administered through a
trust by an independent third-party trustee. The individual
performance awards will be deposited in the trust in four equal
installments, generally on a quarterly basis in the form of cash
and the DCP II requires the trustee to use the cash
exclusively to purchase shares of our common stock in the market. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior
Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of
Security Holders
None.
Item 5. Other Information
In connection with the sale of our CMBS and CDO assets, we have
awarded transition services bonuses to certain employees in the
commercial real estate group including John Scheurer, Douglas
Cooper and Jordan Paul, managing directors. These bonuses are
included in the estimated transaction expenses and total
approximately $3.1 million, which includes
$1.0 million for John Scheurer. These bonuses will be
payable upon completion of the performance of services under the
transition services agreement.
76
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) List of Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Description |
| |
|
|
|
3 |
.1 |
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit a.1 filed with Allied Capitals
Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to registration statement on
Form N-2 (File No. 333-67336) filed on March 22,
2002). |
|
3 |
.2 |
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1. filed with Allied Capitals Form 8-K
on December 15, 2004). |
|
4 |
.1 |
|
Specimen Certificate of Allied Capitals Common Stock, par
value $0.0001 per share. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit d. filed with Allied Capitals registration
statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-51899) filed on
May 6, 1998). |
|
4 |
.2 |
|
Form of debenture between certain subsidiaries of Allied Capital
and the U.S. Small Business Administration. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 filed by a predecessor entity to
Allied Capital on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1996). |
|
10 |
.1 |
|
Dividend Reinvestment Plan, as amended. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit e. filed with Allied Capitals
registration statement on Form N-2 (File
No. 333-87862) filed on May 8, 2002). |
|
10 |
.2 |
|
Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated
April 18, 2003. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 filed with Allied Capitals
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003). |
|
10 |
.2(a) |
|
First Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of October 6,
2003.(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2(a) filed
with Allied Capitals Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2003). |
|
10 |
.2(b) |
|
Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of
December 17, 2003. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2(b) filed with Allied Capitals
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003). |
|
10 |
.2(c) |
|
Third Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated May 28, 2004.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2(c) filed with
Allied Capitals Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2004). |
|
10 |
.2(d) |
|
Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated March 29, 2005.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit f.2(d) filed with
Allied Capitals registration statement on Form N-2
filed on April 7, 2005). |
|
10 |
.2(e)* |
|
Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated April 15,
2005. |
|
10 |
.3 |
|
Note Agreement, dated as of April 30, 1998.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 filed with
Allied Capitals Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 1998). |
|
10 |
.4 |
|
Loan Agreement between a predecessor entity to Allied Capital
and Overseas Private Investment Corporation, dated
April 10, 1995. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit f.7 filed by a predecessor entity to Allied Capital
to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to registration statement
on Form N-2 (File No. 333-64629) filed on
January 24, 1996). Letter, dated December 11,
1997, evidencing assignment of Loan Agreement from the
predecessor entity of Allied Capital to Allied Capital.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Allied
Capitals Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1997). |
|
10 |
.5 |
|
Note Agreement, dated as of May 1, 1999. (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.5 filed with Allied Capital
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 1999). |
|
10 |
.12 |
|
Note Agreement, dated as of October 15, 2000.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4b filed with
Allied Capitals Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2000). |
77
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Description |
| |
|
|
|
10 |
.13 |
|
Note Agreement, dated as of October 15, 2001.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit f.10 filed with
Allied Capitals Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to
registration statement on Form N-2 (File
No. 333-67336) filed on November 14, 2001). |
|
10 |
.15 |
|
Control Investor Guaranty Agreement, dated as of March 28,
2001, between Allied Capital and Fleet National Bank and
Business Loan Express, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit f.14 filed with Allied Capitals
Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to registration statement on
Form N-2 (File No. 333-43534) filed on May 15,
2001). |
|
10 |
.17 |
|
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan II.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A filed with
Allied Capitals Proxy Statement filed on March 30,
2004). |
|
10 |
.18 |
|
Amended and Restated Deferred Compensation Plan, dated
January 30, 2004. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.16 filed with Allied Capitals
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003). |
|
10 |
.19 |
|
Amended Stock Option Plan. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit B of Allied Capitals definitive proxy
statement for Allied Capitals 2004 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders filed on March 30, 2004). |
|
10 |
.20(a) |
|
Allied Capital Corporation 401(k) Plan, dated September 1,
1999. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 filed
with Allied Capitals registration statement on
Form S-8 (File No. 333-88681) filed on October 8,
1999). |
|
10 |
.20(b) |
|
Amendment to Allied Capital Corporation 401(k) Plan, dated
April 15, 2004. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.20(b) filed with Allied Capitals
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004). |
|
10 |
.21 |
|
Employment Agreement, dated January 1, 2004, between Allied
Capital and William L. Walton. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.21 filed with Allied Capitals
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003). |
|
10 |
.22 |
|
Employment Agreement, dated January 1, 2004, between Allied
Capital and Joan M. Sweeney. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.22 filed with Allied Capitals
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003). |
|
10 |
.23 |
|
Retention Agreement, dated March 21, 2005, between Allied
Capital and John M. Scheurer. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 99.1 filed with Allied Capitals current
report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2005). |
|
10 |
.25 |
|
Form of Custody Agreement with Riggs Bank N.A. (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit j.1 filed with Allied Capitals
registration statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-51899) filed on
May 6, 1998). |
|
10 |
.26 |
|
Form of Custody Agreement with LaSalle National Bank.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit j.2 filed with Allied
Capitals registration statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-
51899) filed on May 6, 1998). |
|
10 |
.27 |
|
Custodian Agreement with LaSalle National Bank Association dated
July 9, 2001. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit j.3 filed
with Allied Capitals registration statement on Form N-2
(File No. 333-67336) filed on August 10, 2001). |
|
10 |
.28 |
|
Code of Ethics. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.28 filed with Allied Capitals
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.) |
|
10 |
.30 |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Allied Capital, Allied
Capital Lock Acquisition Corporation, and Sunsource, Inc dated
June 18, 2001. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit k.1
filed with Allied Capitals registration statement on Form
N-2 (File No. 333-67336) filed on August 10, 2001). |
|
10 |
.31 |
|
Note Agreement, dated as of May 14, 2003. (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.31 filed with Allied
Capitals Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2003). |
78
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Description |
| |
|
|
|
10 |
.32 |
|
Amendment, dated as of April 30, 2003, to Note Agreement,
dated as of April 30, 1998. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.32 filed with Allied Capitals
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003). |
|
10 |
.33 |
|
Amendment, dated as of April 30, 2003, to Note Agreement,
dated as of May 1, 1999. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.33 filed with Allied Capitals
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003). |
|
10 |
.35 |
|
Amendment, dated as of April 30, 2003, to Note Agreement,
dated as of October 15, 2000. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.35 filed with Allied Capitals
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003). |
|
10 |
.36 |
|
Amendment, dated as of April 30, 2003, to Note Agreement,
dated as of October 15, 2001. (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.36 filed with Allied Capitals
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003). |
|
10 |
.37 |
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between Allied Capital and its
directors and certain officers. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.37 filed with Allied Capitals
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003). |
|
10 |
.38 |
|
Note Agreement, dated as of March 25, 2004.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 filed with
Allied Capitals Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2004). |
|
10 |
.39 |
|
Note Agreement, dated as of November 15, 2004.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 filed with
Allied Capitals current report on Form 8-K filed on
November 18, 2004). |
|
10 |
.40 |
|
Real Estate Securities Purchase Agreement. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 filed with Allied Capitals
Form 8-K filed on May 4, 2005.) |
|
10 |
.41 |
|
Platform Assets Purchase Agreement. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.2 filed with Allied Capitals
Form 8-K filed on May 4, 2005.) |
|
10 |
.42 |
|
Transition Services Agreement. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 filed with Allied Capitals Form 8-K
filed on May 4, 2005.) |
|
15 |
.* |
|
Letter regarding Unaudited Interim Financial Information |
|
31 |
.1* |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
31 |
.2* |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant
Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
32 |
.1* |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350. |
|
32 |
.2* |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350. |
* Filed herewith.
79
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunder duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
ALLIED CAPITAL CORPORATION |
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
Dated: May 9, 2005
|
|
/s/ William L. Walton
|
|
|
|
|
|
William L. Walton
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
/s/ Penni F. Roll |
|
|
|
|
|
Penni F. Roll
Chief Financial Officer |
80
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Description |
| |
|
|
|
10 |
.2(e)* |
|
Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated April 15, 2005. |
|
15 |
.* |
|
Letter regarding Unaudited Interim Financial Information |
|
31 |
.1* |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
31 |
.2* |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
32 |
.1* |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350. |
|
32 |
.2* |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350. |
* Filed herewith.