UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

(Amendment No. 1)

Filed by the Registrant  ☒                             Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This amended definitive proxy statement (this “Amended Proxy Statement”) is being filed to amend and restate the definitive proxy statement dated April 27, 2018 (the “Proxy Statement”) for the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc. (the “Company”).

Subsequent to the filing of the Proxy Statement, the Company’s nominating and corporate governance committee recommended, and the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”) unanimously approved, the addition of Marcus S. Ryu as a nominee for election as a Class I director at the Annual Meeting, the addition of Elisa A. Steele as a nominee for election as a Class II director at the Annual Meeting, and the addition of Richard Haddrill as a nominee for election as a Class III director at the Annual Meeting. The Board elected Ms. Steele and Mr. Haddrill as directors effective as of and contingent upon their receiving a plurality of votes for their election at the Annual Meeting. The Company’s nominating and corporate governance committee also recommended, and the Board also unanimously approved, the appointment of Ms. Steele as Chairperson, effective upon her election to the Board. Ms. Steele was nominated for election to the Board pursuant to the terms of an investment agreement among the Company and certain affiliates of Silver Lake Group, L.L.C.

This Amended Proxy Statement has been revised to reflect the additions of Ms. Steele and Messrs. Ryu and Haddrill as nominees for election to the Board at the Annual Meeting, to provide certain disclosures in connection with such nominations, and to correctly identify Joe Osnoss as a Class III director.

If you have already voted by Internet, telephone or by mail, no action is required from you unless you wish to change your vote or provide a vote on the election of Mr. Ryu, Ms. Steele or Mr. Haddrill. Votes received prior to the date of this Amended Proxy Statement or those using the previously provided proxy card will not be counted for or against the election of Mr. Ryu, Ms. Steele and Mr. Haddrill to the Board, but will be counted on all other proposals.

Except for the revisions specifically discussed above, the Amended Proxy Statement does not otherwise materially modify or update any other disclosures presented in the Proxy Statement.

May 8, 2018

Dear Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc. Stockholders:

You are cordially invited to attend our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”), which will be held on Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 1:00 p.m. Pacific Time at the Company’s headquarters, located at 1601 Cloverfield Blvd., Suite 620 South, Santa Monica, California 90404.

At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will be asked to vote on the five proposals set forth in the Notice of 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and described in the accompanying proxy statement.

It is important that your shares of the Company’s common stock are represented and voted at the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please vote as soon as possible. Voting your proxy will ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting. We urge you to carefully review the proxy materials and to vote your shares: “FOR” the election of each of the three directors nominated by our board of directors and named in the accompanying proxy statement as Class I directors to serve until the 2021 annual meeting of stockholders, the one director nominated by our board of directors and named in the accompanying proxy statement as a Class II director to serve until the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders, and the one director nominated by our board of directors and named in the accompanying proxy statement as a Class III director to serve until the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders; “FOR” the approval of an amendment to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to declassify our board of directors; “FOR” the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers; “ONE YEAR” for the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers; and “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018.

Thank you for your continued support of Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc.

Sincerely,

/s/ Adam L. Miller

Adam L. Miller

Chief Executive Officer

CORNERSTONE ONDEMAND, INC.

1601 Cloverfield Blvd., Suite 620 South

Santa Monica, California 90404

NOTICE OF 2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held on Thursday, June 14, 2018

at 1:00 p.m. Pacific Time

The 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) of Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc., a Delaware corporation, will be held at the Company’s headquarters, located at 1601 Cloverfield Blvd., Suite 620 South, Santa Monica, California 90404 on Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 1:00 p.m. Pacific Time and, if applicable, at any adjournments or postponements thereof. At the Annual Meeting, our stockholders will be asked:

The accompanying proxy statement more fully describes these proposals.

We have elected to take advantage of a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rule that allows us to furnish our proxy materials over the Internet to our stockholders rather than in paper form. We believe that this delivery process reduces our environmental impact and lowers the cost of printing and distributing our proxy materials without affecting our stockholders’ timely access to this important information. Accordingly, unless you have previously requested to receive our proxy materials in paper form, you should have received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”), which we mailed on or about April 27, 2018. The Notice explains how to access our proxy materials and vote by telephone or over the Internet.

Our board of directors has fixed the close of business on April 23, 2018 as the record date for the Annual Meeting. Only stockholders of record on April 23, 2018 are entitled to receive notice of and vote at the Annual Meeting. All stockholders are invited to attend the Annual Meeting in person. However, to ensure your representation at the Annual Meeting, please vote as soon as possible by following the instructions in the Notice. Any stockholder attending the Annual Meeting may vote in person even if he, she or it has voted using the Internet, telephone or proxy card, and any previous votes that were submitted by the stockholder, whether by Internet, telephone or mail, will be superseded by the vote such stockholder casts at the Annual Meeting. For further information, please see the information in the Notice and in the accompanying proxy statement.

By order of the Board of Directors

/s/ Adam L. Miller

Adam L. Miller

Chief Executive Officer

Santa Monica, California

May 8, 2018

YOUR VOTE IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT. TO ENSURE YOUR REPRESENTATION AT THE ANNUAL MEETING, YOU ARE URGED TO VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR INTERNET AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE. ALTERNATIVELY, YOU MAY REQUEST A PAPER PROXY CARD, WHICH YOU MAY COMPLETE, SIGN AND RETURN BY MAIL.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CORNERSTONE ONDEMAND, INC.

FOR THE 2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held on Thursday, June 14, 2018

at 1:00 p.m. Pacific Time

GENERAL INFORMATION

We are providing you with this revised proxy statement and the enclosed form of proxy in connection with the solicitation by the board of directors of Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc. of proxies to be used at our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”). The Annual Meeting will be at held at the Company’s headquarters, located at 1601 Cloverfield Blvd., Suite 620 South, Santa Monica, California 90404, on Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 1:00 p.m. Pacific Time and, if applicable, at any adjournment or postponement thereof. This proxy statement contains important information regarding the Annual Meeting, the proposals on which you are being asked to vote, information you may find useful in determining how to vote, and information about voting procedures. As used herein, “we,” “us,” “our,” “Cornerstone” or the “Company” refers to Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

The original proxy statement and our annual report to stockholders were first made available to our stockholders on or about April 27, 2018.

The information provided in the “question and answer” format below addresses certain frequently asked questions but is not intended to be a summary of all matters contained in this proxy statement. You should read this entire proxy statement carefully before voting your shares. Information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not intended to be incorporated by reference into this proxy statement and references to our website address in this proxy statement are inactive textual references only.

NOTICE OF INTERNET AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

In accordance with the “notice and access” rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), instead of mailing a printed copy of our proxy statement, proxy card and annual report (collectively, the “proxy materials”) to stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, we are furnishing the proxy materials to our stockholders over the Internet. If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials. Instead, the Notice will instruct you as to how you may access and review the proxy materials and submit your vote via the Internet. If you received a Notice by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of the proxy materials, please follow the instructions for requesting such materials included in the Notice.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND THESE PROXY MATERIALS

What matters will be voted on at the Annual Meeting?

At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will be voting on:

1

How does our board of directors recommend that I vote?

Our board of directors recommends that you vote:

Will there be any other items of business on the agenda?

If any other items of business or other matters are properly brought before the Annual Meeting, your proxy gives discretionary authority to the persons named on the proxy card with respect to those items of business or other matters. The persons named on the proxy card intend to vote the proxy in accordance with their best judgment. Our board of directors does not intend to bring any other matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting. We are not currently aware of any other matters that may properly be presented by others for action at the Annual Meeting.

Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

Holders of our common stock at the close of business on April 23, 2018, the record date for the Annual Meeting, are entitled to receive notice of and vote at the Annual Meeting. Each stockholder is entitled to one vote for each share of our common stock held as of the record date. As of the record date, there were 57,705,470 shares of our common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. No shares of preferred stock were outstanding.

A complete list of the stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available at our headquarters, located at 1601 Cloverfield Blvd., Suite 620 South, Santa Monica, California 90404, during regular business hours for the ten days prior to the Annual Meeting. This list also will be available during the Annual Meeting at the meeting location. Stockholders may examine the list for any legally valid purpose related to the Annual Meeting.

What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner?

Stockholders of Record. If, at the close of business on the record date, your shares of our common stock are registered directly in your name with Computershare Trust Company, N.A., our transfer agent, you are considered to be the stockholder of record of such shares. Throughout this proxy statement, we refer to registered

2

stockholders as “stockholders of record.” If you are a stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to the individuals listed on the proxy card or to vote in person at the Annual Meeting.

Beneficial Owner. If, at the close of business on the record date, your shares of our common stock were held in a brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee on your behalf, you are considered to be the “beneficial owner” of shares of common stock held in “street name.” Throughout this proxy statement, we refer to stockholders who hold their shares through a broker, bank or other nominee as “beneficial owner.” If you are a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other nominee how to vote your shares by following the voting instructions your broker, bank or other nominee provides. If you do not provide your broker, bank or other nominee with instructions on how to vote your shares, your broker, bank or other nominee may not vote your shares with respect to any non-routine matters, but it may, in its discretion, vote your shares with respect to routine matters. Please see “What if I do not specify how my shares are to be voted?” for a description of routine versus non-routine matters.

Do I have to do anything in advance if I plan to attend the Annual Meeting in person?

Stockholders of Record. If you are a stockholder of record, you do not need to do anything in advance to attend and/or vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting, but you will need to present government-issued photo identification for entrance to the Annual Meeting.

Beneficial Owner. If you are a beneficial owner, you may not vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you obtain a “legal proxy” from the broker, bank or other nominee who is the stockholder of record with respect to your shares. You may still attend the Annual Meeting even if you do not have a legal proxy. For entrance to the Annual Meeting, you will need to present government-issued photo identification and provide proof of beneficial ownership as of the record date, such as the notice or voting instructions you received from your broker, bank or other nominee or a brokerage statement reflecting your ownership of shares as of the record date.

How do I vote and what are the voting deadlines?

Stockholders of Record. If you are a stockholder of record, there are several ways for you to vote your shares:

3

If you have already voted by Internet, telephone or by mail, no action is required from you unless you wish to change your vote or provide a vote on the election of Mr. Ryu, Ms. Steele or Mr. Haddrill. Votes received prior to the date of this revised proxy statement or those using the previously provided proxy card will not be counted for or against the election of Mr. Ryu, Ms. Steele and Mr. Haddrill to our board of directors, but will be counted on all other proposals.

Beneficial Owners. If you are a beneficial owner, you will receive voting instructions from your broker, bank or other nominee. You must follow the voting instructions provided by your broker, bank or other nominee in order to instruct your broker, bank or other nominee on how to vote your shares. The availability of telephone and Internet voting will depend on the voting process of your broker, bank or other nominee. As discussed above, if you are a beneficial owner, you may not vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you obtain a “legal proxy” from your broker, bank or other nominee.

Can I revoke or change my vote after I submit my proxy?

Stockholders of Record. If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy or change your proxy instructions at any time before your proxy is voted at the Annual Meeting by:

If you have already voted by Internet, telephone or by mail, no action is required from you unless you wish to change your vote or provide a vote on the election of Mr. Ryu, Ms. Steele or Mr. Haddrill. Votes received prior to the date of this revised proxy statement or those using the previously provided proxy card will not be counted for or against the election of Mr. Ryu, Ms. Steele and Mr. Haddrill to our board of directors, but will be counted on all other proposals.

Beneficial Owners. If you are a beneficial owner, you must contact the broker, bank or other nominee holding your shares and follow its instructions to change your vote or revoke your proxy.

What is the effect of giving a proxy?

Proxies are solicited by and on behalf of our board of directors. The persons named in the proxy have been designated as proxy holders by our board of directors. When a proxy is properly dated, executed and returned, the shares represented by the proxy will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions of the stockholder. If no specific instructions are given, however, the shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of our board of directors. If any matters not described in this proxy statement are properly presented at the Annual Meeting, the proxy holders will use their own judgment to determine how to vote your shares. If the Annual Meeting is postponed or adjourned, the proxy holders can vote your shares on the new meeting date, unless you have properly revoked your proxy, as described above.

What if I do not specify how my shares are to be voted?

Stockholders of Record. If you are a stockholder of record and you submit a proxy but you do not provide voting instructions, your shares will be voted:

4

Beneficial Owners. If you are a beneficial owner and you do not provide the broker, bank or other nominee that holds your shares with voting instructions, your broker, bank or other nominee will determine if it has the discretionary authority to vote on the particular matter. Brokers, banks and other nominees do not have discretion to vote on non-routine matters. Proposal 1, 2, 3, and 4 are non-routine matters, while Proposal 5 is a routine matter. As a result, if you do not provide voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee, your broker, bank or other nominee may not vote your shares with respect to Proposal 1, 2, 3, or 4, which would result in a broker non-vote, but may, in its discretion, vote your shares with respect to Proposal 5. For additional information regarding broker non-votes, see “What are the effects of abstentions and broker non-votes?” below.

What constitutes a quorum, and why is a quorum required?

A quorum is the minimum number of shares required to be present at the Annual Meeting for the meeting to be properly held under our bylaws and Delaware law. A quorum exists when at least a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote at the close of business on the record date are represented at the Annual Meeting, either in person or by proxy. As of the close of business on the record date, we had 57,705,470 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, meaning that 28,852,736 shares of common stock must be represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting to have a quorum. If there is not a quorum, the chairperson of the Annual Meeting or a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting may adjourn the meeting to a later date.

What are the effects of abstentions and broker non-votes?

An abstention represents a stockholder’s affirmative choice to decline to vote on a proposal. If a stockholder indicates on its proxy card that it wishes to abstain from voting its shares, or if a broker, bank or other nominee holding its customers’ shares of record causes abstentions to be recorded for shares, these shares will be considered present and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. As a result, an abstention for Proposal 2, 3 or 5 will be counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum and will also count as votes against such proposal. An abstention for Proposal 4 will have no effect on the outcome of such proposal so long as a quorum exists.

A broker non-vote occurs when a broker, bank or other nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power with respect to such proposal and has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares. Broker non-votes will be counted for the purpose of calculating whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting. Thus, a broker non-vote will make a quorum more readily attainable, but will not otherwise affect the outcome of the vote on Proposal 1, 3, 4 and 5. A broker non-vote on Proposal 2 will have the same effect as a vote against such proposal.

5

What is the vote required for each proposal?

With respect to Proposal 1, you may (i) vote FOR all nominees, (ii) WITHHOLD your vote as to all nominees, or (iii) vote FOR all nominees except for those specific nominees from whom you WITHHOLD your vote. The three Class I director nominees, the one Class II director nominee, and the one Class III director nominee receiving the most FOR votes will be elected. You may not cumulate votes in the election of directors. Any shares not voted FOR a particular nominee (whether as a result of a vote being withheld or a broker non-vote) will not be counted in such nominee’s favor and will have no effect on the outcome of the election. If you WITHHOLD your vote as to all nominees, you will be deemed to have ABSTAINED from voting on Proposal 1, and such abstention will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

With respect to Proposals 2, 3 and 5, you may vote FOR, AGAINST or ABSTAIN. If you ABSTAIN from voting on Proposal 2, 3 or 5, the abstention will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the proposal.

With respect to Proposal 4, you may vote ONE YEAR, TWO YEARS, THREE YEARS or ABSTAIN. If you ABSTAIN from voting on Proposal 4, the abstention will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.

Who will count the votes?

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”) has been engaged to receive and tabulate stockholder votes. Broadridge will also certify the election results and perform any other acts required by the Delaware General Corporation Law.

Who is paying for the costs of this proxy solicitation?

We will bear the entire cost of proxy solicitation, including the preparation, assembly, printing, mailing and distribution of the proxy materials. Copies of solicitation materials will also be made available upon request to brokerage houses and other nominees holding shares in their names that are beneficially owned by others to forward to such beneficial owners. The original solicitation of proxies may be supplemented by solicitation by telephone, electronic communication, or other means by our directors, officers, employees or agents. No additional compensation will be paid to these individuals for any such services, although we may reimburse such individuals for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with such solicitation. We do not plan to retain a proxy solicitor to assist in the solicitation of proxies.

How can I find the results of the Annual Meeting?

Preliminary results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. Final results will be published in a Current Report on Form 8-K to be filed with the SEC within four business days after the Annual Meeting. If the official

6

results are not available at that time, we will provide preliminary voting results in the Current Report on Form 8-K and will provide the final results in an amendment to the Current Report on Form 8-K as soon as they become available.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our board of directors, which is currently composed of nine members. Eight of our directors are independent within the meaning of the listing standards of The Nasdaq Stock Market, or Nasdaq. Our board of directors is divided into three staggered classes of directors. At each annual meeting of stockholders, a class of directors will be elected for a three-year term to succeed the same class whose term is then expiring.

On January 12, 2018, R. C. Mark Baker and Joseph P. Payne, two of our current directors, notified us of their decisions to retire from our board of directors at the Annual Meeting.

On May 8, 2018, following an extensive search for qualified director candidates conducted by our nominating and corporate governance committee, our nominating and corporate governance committee recommended, and our board of directors approved, the addition of Marcus Ryu as a nominee for election as a Class I director at the Annual Meeting, the addition of Elisa A. Steele as a nominee for election as a Class II director at the Annual Meeting, and the addition of Richard Haddrill as a nominee for election as a Class III director at the Annual Meeting. Our board of directors elected Ms. Steele and Mr. Haddrill as directors effective as of and contingent upon their receiving a plurality of votes for their election at the Annual Meeting.

Potential director candidates were solicited from members of our board of directors and shareholder recommendations. Our board of directors interviewed and considered a number of director candidates who were evaluated based on the established criteria for persons to be nominated. Our board of directors believes Ms. Steele and Messrs. Ryu and Haddrill each meet the established criteria and are the best qualified candidates for election to our board of directors. Each of Ms. Steele and Messrs. Ryu and Haddrill is a new nominee for election to our board of directors this year.

The following table sets forth the names, ages as of February 28, 2018, and certain other information for each of our directors who will continue to serve after the Annual Meeting and for each of our director nominees:

7

There is no family relationship among any of the nominees, directors and/or any of our executive officers. Our executive officers serve at the discretion of our board of directors. Further information about our directors, including each of the director nominees, is provided below.

Adam L. Miller founded the Company and has been our Chief Executive Officer and a member of our board of directors since May 1999. In addition to strategy, sales and operations, Mr. Miller has led our product development efforts since our inception. Prior to founding Cornerstone, Mr. Miller was an investment banker with Schroders plc, a financial services firm. Since its formation, Mr. Miller has served as the Chairman of the Cornerstone OnDemand Foundation, which leverages Cornerstone’s expertise, solutions and partner ecosystem to help empower communities. Since February 2017, Mr. Miller has served on the board of directors of Mindbody, Inc., a software provider for class- and appointment-based businesses. Mr. Miller also writes and speaks extensively about talent management and on-demand software. Mr. Miller holds a J.D. from the School of Law of the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), an M.B.A. from UCLA’s Anderson School of Business, a B.A. from the University of Pennsylvania (Penn) and a B.S. from Penn’s Wharton School of Business. He also earned C.P.A. (inactive) and Series 7 certifications. We believe that Mr. Miller possesses specific attributes that qualify him to serve as a member of our board of directors, including his operational expertise and the historical knowledge and perspective he has gained as our Chief Executive Officer and one of our founders.

Harold W. Burlingame has been a member of our board of directors since March 2006. From December 2004 to July 2010, Mr. Burlingame served as Chairman of ORC Worldwide, Inc., a provider of human resource knowledge and solutions. In addition, since June 1998, Mr. Burlingame has served as a director of UniSource Energy Corporation, an owner of electric and gas service providers. Previously, Mr. Burlingame served as Executive Vice President of Human Resources for AT&T Corp. and as Senior Executive Advisor for AT&T Wireless. Mr. Burlingame received his B.A. in Communications from Muskingum College. We believe that Mr. Burlingame’s extensive experience in human resources and management qualifies him to serve as a member of our board of directors.

Dean Carter has been a member of our board of directors since May 2017. Mr. Carter has served as Vice President of Human Resources and Shared Services at Patagonia, Inc., a designer of outdoor clothing and gear, since May 2015. From June 2010 to April 2015, Mr. Carter served as Chief Human Resources Officer and Vice President of Talent and Human Capital Services at Sears Holdings Corporation, a nationwide retailer. From January 2000, to January 10, 2010, Mr. Carter served as Chief Human Resources Officer at Fossil Group, Inc., a design, marketing and distribution company. Mr. Carter holds a B.S. in Organizational Communication from the University of Texas at Austin. We believe that Mr. Carter’s extensive experience in human resources and management qualifies him to serve as a member of our board of directors.

Robert Cavanaugh has been a member of our board of directors since April 2015. Mr. Cavanaugh has served as the President of Field Operations of Accolade, Inc., a private company that operates a consumer healthcare engagement platform, since November 2015. Prior to this role, Mr. Cavanaugh served in several roles, including as President Worldwide Enterprise, SMB & Government, at Concur Technologies, Inc., a provider of integrated travel and expense management solutions, from 1999 to April 2015. Prior to joining Concur Technologies, Inc., Mr. Cavanaugh held consulting and implementation management positions at Seeker Software and Ceridian Corporation. Mr. Cavanaugh holds a B.S. in Business Administration from Norwich University. We believe that

8

Mr. Cavanaugh possesses specific attributes that qualify him to serve as a member of our board of directors, including his experience managing technology companies, in the software industry and with SaaS.

Richard Haddrill has served as Founder and Member of The Groop, LLC, a private investment management firm, since January 2018. Mr. Haddrill has served as Vice Chairman of Scientific Games Corporation, a provider of technology-based products and services for gaming and lottery organizations (“SGC”), since February 2018. Mr. Haddrill was employed as Executive Vice Chairman of SGC starting in December 2014, following SGC’s acquisition of Bally Technologies, Inc., a gaming company, in November 2014. Previously, Mr. Haddrill served as Chief Executive Officer of Bally from 2004 to 2012 and from May 2014 until SGC’s acquisition of Bally, and served on the board of directors of Bally from April 2003 until SGC’s acquisition of Bally. Previously Mr Haddrill served as the Chief Executive Officer of two other public companies, Manhattan Associates, Inc. and Powerhouse Technologies, Inc. He is a business graduate of the University of Michigan. We believe that Mr. Haddrill’s extensive experience as an executive and/or director for public and private technology, software and gaming companies qualifies him to serve as a member of our board of directors.

Joseph Osnoss has been a member of our board of directors since December 2017. Mr. Osnoss serves as a managing director based in the New York office of Silver Lake, which he joined in 2002. From 2010 to 2014, he was based in London, where he helped oversee the firm’s activities in EMEA. He serves on the boards of several software, services and transaction processing companies, including Cast & Crew, Cegid, Global Blue and Sabre Corporation. He also is closely involved with Silver Lake’s investment in Red Ventures and previously served on the boards of Interactive Data Corporation, Mercury Payment Systems and Virtu Financial. Mr. Osnoss graduated summa cum laude from Harvard College, with an A.B. in Applied Mathematics and a citation in French language. He also has served as visiting professor of finance at the London School of Economics. We believe that Mr. Osnoss’ extensive experience in private equity investing, including the technology sector, and service on the boards of directors of other companies, both domestically and internationally, qualify him to serve as a member of our board of directors.

Marcus S. Ryu has served as a director of and in various other positions at Guidewire Software, Inc., a provider of software products for property and casualty insurers, since 2001, including as Chief Executive Officer and President. From 2000 to 2001, Mr. Ryu served as Vice President of Strategy at Ariba, Inc. From 1998 to 2000, Mr. Ryu served as a consultant at McKinsey & Company. Mr. Ryu served on the boards of directors of Opower, Inc., a software company in the utilities space, from August 2013 until its sale to Oracle Corporation in June 2016, and Mulesoft, Inc., a software company, from December 2017 until its sale to salesforce.com in May 2018. Mr. Ryu holds an A.B. from Princeton University and a B.Phil. from New College, Oxford University. We believe that Mr. Ryu is qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors because of his experience as a public company chief executive officer and his knowledge of selling software into a large vertical industry.

Kristina Salen has been a member of our board of directors since July 2014. Ms. Salen serves as Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of Translations Enterprises, LLC, an artist services company, since July 2017. Prior to that, Ms. Salen served as Chief Financial Officer of Etsy, Inc., an online marketplace, from 2013 until 2017. Prior to Etsy, Ms. Salen led the media, Internet, and telecommunications research group of FMR LLC d/b/a Fidelity Investments, a multinational financial services company, from January 2006 to January 2013. Prior to Fidelity, Ms. Salen worked in various financial and executive roles at several companies, including Oppenheimer Capital LLC, an investment firm, from June 2002 to December 2005; Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., a financial services corporation acquired by Bank of America Corporation in January 2009, from June 1997 to June 2001; Lazard Freres & Co. LLC, a global financial advisory and asset management firm, from April 1996 to June 1997; and SBC Warburg, an investment bank, from December 1994 to April 1996. Ms. Salen holds a B.A. in Political Science from Vassar College and an M.B.A. from Columbia University. We believe Ms. Salen possesses specific attributes that qualify her to serve as a member of our board of directors, including her financial expertise and her experience leading and managing technology companies.

Elisa A. Steele has served as a board member or advisor to various technology companies since July 2017. From January 2014 to July 2017, Ms. Steele served in various positions at Jive Software, Inc., a communication and

9

collaboration software company, including as Chief Executive Officer and President from February 2015 to July 2017. From August 2013 to December 2013, Ms. Steele served as Corporate Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer of Consumer Applications and Services at Microsoft Corporation, a worldwide provider of software, services and solutions. Ms. Steele served as Chief Marketing Officer of the Skype business (owned by Microsoft) from July 2012 to August 2013. Prior to joining Microsoft’s Skype business, Ms. Steele served as Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer at Yahoo! Inc., an internet services company. Ms. Steele has served as a director of Splunk Inc., a provider of real-time operational intelligence software, since September 2017. Ms. Steele holds a B.S. in Business Administration from the University of New Hampshire and an M.B.A. from San Francisco State University. We believe that Ms. Steele’s extensive executive-level experience in marketing and products at a number of public and private technology companies qualifies her to serve as a member of our board of directors.

Steffan C. Tomlinson has been a member of our board of directors since May 2017. Mr. Tomlinson served as Chief Financial Officer of Palo Alto Networks, Inc., a cyber security company, from February 2012 to March 2018. Prior to this role, Mr. Tomlinson served as Chief Financial Officer at Arista Networks, Inc., a provider of cloud networking solutions, from September 2011 to January 2012. Mr. Tomlinson was a Partner of and served as Chief Administrative Officer at Silver Lake Kraftwerk, a private investment firm, from April 2011 to September 2011. Mr. Tomlinson served as Chief Financial Officer at Aruba Networks, Inc., a provider of intelligent wireless LAN switching systems, from September 2005 to March 2011. Mr. Tomlinson served in several financial roles and ultimately served as Chief Financial Officer at Peribit Networks, Inc., a provider of WAN optimization technology, from October 2000 until August 2005. Mr. Tomlinson served on the boards of directors of Qlik Technologies Inc., from January 2013 to June 2016, and Riverbed Technology, Inc., from September 2014 to April 2015. Mr. Tomlinson holds a B.A. in Sociology from Trinity College and an M.B.A. from Santa Clara University. We believe Mr. Tomlinson possesses specific attributes that qualify him to serve as a member of our board of directors, including his experience in the management of technology companies and his financial expertise in the software industry.

Overview

Our board of directors oversees our Chief Executive Officer and other senior management in the competent and ethical operation of our business and affairs and ensures that the long-term interests of our stockholders are being served. The key practices and procedures of our board of directors are outlined in our Corporate Governance Principles, which are available on the Investor Relations page of our website at investors.cornerstoneondemand.com, under “Governance.”

Leadership Structure

Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Principles, the roles of Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer may be filled by the same or different individuals. This allows our board of directors flexibility to determine whether the two roles should be combined or separated based on our needs and our board of directors’ assessment of our leadership from time to time. Our board of directors believes that it is in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders for Adam Miller, our Chief Executive Officer, to have served as our Chairperson, and R. C. Mark Baker, an independent director, to have served as our Lead Independent Director.

Our board of directors believes that having our Chief Executive Officer fill the role of Chairperson and a non-employee director fill the role of Lead Independent Director has provided the appropriate balance in our leadership. Combining the roles of Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer promoted unified leadership and direction, contributing to operational effectiveness and efficiencies that facilitated the implementation of strategic initiatives and business plans to optimize stockholder value. In order to facilitate communication between management and the independent members of our board of directors, the Lead Independent Director was authorized to schedule and prepare agendas for meetings or closed sessions without the presence of employee directors or members of management. The Lead Independent Director was also responsible for communicating with our Chief Executive Officer, disseminating information to the rest of our board of directors in a timely manner, and raising issues with management on behalf of the independent directors when appropriate.

10

In January 2018, the Company announced its plan to separate the roles of Chairperson and Chief Executive Officer once a new Chairperson is appointed. Our board of directors believes that, in light of the Company’s current business and operating environment, such structure, when implemented, will help streamline decision-making and enhance accountability. On May 8, 2018, our nominating and corporate governance committee recommended, and our board of directors approved, the appointment of Ms. Steele as Chairperson, effective as of the effectiveness of her election to our board of directors. Accordingly, if elected to our board of directors, Ms. Steele will begin serve as Chairperson.

Our board of directors, including each of its committees, has full access to members of management, either as a group or individually, and to information deemed necessary to fulfill the obligations of our board of directors and its committees.

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

Our management has day-to-day responsibility for identifying risks facing the Company, including implementing suitable mitigating processes and controls, assessing risks in relation to the Company’s strategies and objectives, and appropriately managing risks in a manner that serves the best interests of the Company, its stockholders, and other stakeholders. Our board of directors is responsible for ensuring that an appropriate culture of risk management exists within the Company, overseeing its aggregate risk profile, and assisting management in addressing specific risks.

Generally, various committees of our board of directors oversee risks associated with their respective areas of responsibility and expertise. For example, our Audit Committee oversees, reviews and discusses with management and our independent registered public accounting firm, our major financial reporting and accounting risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and mitigate those exposures. Our Compensation Committee oversees risks associated with our compensation policies, plans and practices. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees the management of risks associated with director independence and board of directors’ composition and organization. Management and other employees report to our board of directors and/or relevant committee(s) from time to time on risk-related issues.

Director Independence

Under the listing standards of Nasdaq, independent directors must comprise a majority of a listed company’s board of directors. In addition, the listing standards of Nasdaq require that, subject to specified exceptions, each member of a listed company’s audit, compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees be independent. Under the listing standards of Nasdaq, a director will only qualify as an “independent director” if, in the opinion of that company’s board of directors, the director does not have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

Audit committee members must also satisfy the additional independence criteria set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the listing standards of Nasdaq. In addition, compensation committee members must also satisfy the additional independence criteria set forth in Rule 10C-1 under the Exchange Act and the listing standards of Nasdaq.

Based upon information requested from and provided by each director concerning his or her background, employment and affiliations, including family relationships, our board of directors has determined that none of Harold Burlingame, Dean Carter, Robert Cavanaugh, Richard Haddrill, Joseph Osnoss, Marcus S. Ryu, Kristina Salen, Elisa A. Steele and Steffan Tomlinson, representing nine of the ten directors who will serve on our board of directors if Proposal 1 (election of directors) is approved by our stockholders, has a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of such director or director nominee and that each of these directors or director nominees is “independent” as that term is defined under the listing standards of Nasdaq. In addition, our board of directors determined that R. C. Mark Baker and Joseph Payne, who will continue to serve as directors until the Annual Meeting, are also independent. Our board of directors also

11

determined that Messrs. Burlingame and Tomlinson and Ms. Salen, who comprise our Audit Committee, Messrs. Baker, Burlingame and Carter, who comprise our Compensation Committee, and Messrs. Carter, Cavanaugh and Osnoss, who comprise our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, satisfy the independence standards for those committees established by applicable SEC rules and the listing standards of Nasdaq. In making this determination, our board of directors considered the relationships that each non-employee director has with us and all other facts and circumstances our board of directors deemed relevant in determining their independence.

Investment Agreement

Pursuant to the terms of an investment agreement (the “Investment Agreement”) among the Company and certain affiliates of Silver Lake Group, L.L.C. (“Silver Lake”), Silver Lake became entitled to nominate two individuals to our board of directors. As long as Silver Lake or its affiliates beneficially own shares of our common stock (assuming conversion of the convertible notes held by Silver Lake) representing in excess of 10% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, Silver Lake will maintain the right to nominate two individuals for election to our board of directors, at least one of whom will be a managing director, director, officer, senior-level employee or advisor of Silver Lake or certain of its affiliates. As long as Silver Lake or its affiliates beneficially own shares of our common stock (assuming conversion of the convertible notes held by Silver Lake) representing in excess of 4% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, Silver Lake will maintain the right to nominate one individual for election to our board of directors, which individual will be a managing director, director, officer, senior-level employee or advisor of Silver Lake or certain of its affiliates.

In accordance with the terms of the Investment Agreement, Silver Lake nominated, and our board of directors elected, Joseph Osnoss to our board of directors. In May 2018, Silver Lake nominated Elisa A. Steele for election to our board of directors.

Director Nomination Process

Candidates for nomination to our board of directors are selected by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in accordance with its charter, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws, and our Corporate Governance Principles. While there are no specific minimum qualifications for director nominees, the ideal candidate should exhibit qualifications that will increase overall effectiveness of our board of directors, including independence, previous experience as a director or executive with other successful companies, the ability to meet other requirements under applicable rules (e.g., the requirement that members of our Audit Committee have an appropriate level of financial literacy and expertise), a high level of personal and professional ethics and integrity, proven achievement and competence in the nominee’s field, skills that are complementary to those of existing members of our board of directors, the ability to assist and support management and make significant contributions to our success, and an understanding of the fiduciary duties belonging to members of our board of directors and the commitment of time and energy necessary to diligently fulfill those duties. In evaluating the suitability of a director candidate, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers factors such as character, integrity, judgment, diversity, including, but not limited to, diversity in terms of experience, gender, race and ethnicity, independence, area of expertise, corporate experience, length of service, potential conflicts of interest, other commitments and the like.

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee makes an effort to ensure that our board of directors’ composition reflects a broad diversity of experience, professions, skills, viewpoints, personal traits and backgrounds. However, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not have a formal policy with respect to diversity, does not assign specific weights to particular criteria and does not believe that any specific criterion is necessarily applicable to all prospective nominees. Instead, when reviewing a candidate, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews the candidate’s qualifications in light of the specific needs of our board of directors at that time.

To date, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has relied on its network of contacts to compile a list of potential candidates, but it is authorized to retain recruiting professionals to assist in identifying and

12

evaluating candidates for consideration as needed. After conducting appropriate inquiries into the backgrounds and qualifications of potential candidates and reviewing the candidates in light of the factors discussed above, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee selects nominees for recommendation to our board of directors by majority vote. Based on our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation, our board of directors selects director nominees and recommends them for election by our stockholders. Our board of directors may also fill any vacancies that arise between annual meetings of stockholders.

Stockholder Recommendations and Nominations of Candidates for Election to our Board of Directors

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider director candidates who are timely recommended by stockholders who have continuously held at least 1% of the fully diluted capitalization of our company for at least 12 months prior to the submission of the recommendation. The recommendation must include the candidate’s name, home and business contact information, detailed biographical data, relevant qualifications, a signed letter from the candidate confirming willingness to serve, information regarding any relationships between the candidate and the Company and evidence of the recommending stockholder’s ownership of the requisite number of shares of our common stock during the 12-month period referenced above. There are no differences in the manner in which our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates nominees for director based on whether the nominee is recommended by a stockholder or otherwise.

A stockholder of record can nominate a candidate directly for election to our board of directors by complying with the procedures in Section 2.4 of our bylaws and the rules and regulations of the SEC. Any eligible stockholder who wishes to submit a nomination should review the requirements in our bylaws for nominations by stockholders. Any nomination should be sent in writing to our General Counsel at Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc., 1601 Cloverfield Blvd., Suite 620 South, Santa Monica, California 90404. Notice must be received by us no earlier than February 11, 2019 and no later than March 13, 2019 for our 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The notice must state the information required by Section 2.4 of our bylaws and otherwise must comply with applicable federal and state law.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

We have adopted a code of business conduct that is applicable to all of our employees, officers and directors, including our chief executive, principal financial and principal accounting officers. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on the Investor Relations page of our website at investors.cornerstoneondemand.com, under “Governance.” We will post amendments to our code of business conduct or waivers of our code of business conduct for directors and executive officers on the same website.

Communication with our Board of Directors

Any stockholder wishing to communicate with any of our directors may write to the director, c/o General Counsel, at Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc., 1601 Cloverfield Blvd., Suite 620 South, Santa Monica, California 90404. Our General Counsel will review all incoming stockholder communications (except for mass mailings, product complaints or inquiries, job inquiries, business solicitations and patently offensive or otherwise inappropriate materials) and, if appropriate, forward such communications to the appropriate director(s) or, if none is specified, to the Chairperson of our board of directors. This procedure does not apply to stockholder proposals submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews and approves the stockholder communication process periodically in an effort to enable an effective method by which stockholders can communicate with our board of directors.

BOARD MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD

Board and Committee Meetings

Our board of directors and its committees meet throughout the year on a set schedule, hold special meetings as needed, and act by written consent from time to time. Our board of directors met 15 times during 2017. During

13

2017, each director attended at least 75% or more of the aggregate of (a) the total number of meetings of our board of directors (held during the period for which he or she served as a director) and (b) the total number of meetings held by all committees of our board of directors on which he or she served (held during the periods for which he or she served).

While we do not mandate attendance by members of our board of directors at our annual meetings of stockholders, we do have a formal policy encouraging our directors to attend. Eight directors attended our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, either in person or telephonically.

The following table sets forth the three standing committees of our board of directors and the members of each committee:

Committees of our Board of Directors

Our board of directors has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, each of which has the composition and the responsibilities described below. Our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee all operate under charters approved by our board of directors, which charters are available on the Investor Relations page of our website at investors.cornerstoneondemand.com, under “Governance.”

Audit Committee. Our Audit Committee oversees our corporate accounting and financial reporting process and assists our board of directors in monitoring our financial systems and our legal and regulatory compliance. Our Audit Committee is responsible for, among other things:

Our Audit Committee consists of Messrs. Burlingame and Tomlinson and Ms. Salen, with Ms. Salen serving as chairperson. Our board of directors has determined that each member of our Audit Committee meets the financial literacy requirements under the listing standards of Nasdaq and the SEC rules and regulations, and Ms. Salen qualifies as our Audit Committee financial expert as defined under SEC rules and regulations. Our board of directors has concluded that the composition of our Audit Committee meets the requirements for independence under the current listing standards of Nasdaq and SEC rules and regulations. We believe that the functioning of our Audit Committee complies with the applicable requirements of Nasdaq and SEC rules and regulations. Our Audit Committee met seven times during 2017.

14

Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee oversees our corporate compensation policies, plans and programs. Our Compensation Committee is responsible for, among other things:

Our Compensation Committee consists of Messrs. Baker, Burlingame and Carter, with Mr. Burlingame serving as chairman. Our board of directors has determined that each member of our Compensation Committee is independent within the meaning of the listing standards of Nasdaq and SEC rules and regulations, including Rule 10C-1 under the Exchange Act, is a “non-employee director” within the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act, and is an “outside director” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. We believe that the composition of our Compensation Committee meets the requirements for independence under, and the functioning of our Compensation Committee complies with, any applicable listing standards of Nasdaq and SEC rules and regulations. Our Compensation Committee met two times during 2017. For additional information regarding the procedures for the consideration and determination of executive compensation, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees and assists our board of directors in reviewing and recommending corporate governance policies and nominees for election to our board of directors. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for, among other things:

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consists of Messrs. Carter, Cavanaugh and Osnoss, with Mr. Osnoss serving as chairman. Our board of directors has determined that each of Messrs. Carter, Cavanaugh and Osnoss are independent within the meaning of the listing standards of Nasdaq. We believe that the composition of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meets the requirements for independence under, and the functioning of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee complies with, any applicable listing standards of Nasdaq and SEC rules and regulations. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met nine times in 2017. For additional information regarding our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, see “Corporate Governance — Director Nomination Process” above.

In addition, we convened a transaction committee in 2017 to thoroughly evaluate the Company’s various strategic alternatives. That committee met 13 times in 2017.

Our board of directors may from time to time establish other standing and ad hoc committees, as is necessary or desirable.

15

Director Compensation

The following table sets forth information concerning compensation paid or accrued for services rendered to us by non-employee members of our board of directors for the year ended December 31, 2017. Adam Miller, our Chief Executive Officer, does not receive additional compensation for his service as a director.

In 2017, our Compensation Committee undertook a competitive review of non-employee director compensation. Based on the results of that review, the Compensation Committee determined it was appropriate to make, and our board of directors approved, the following compensation adjustments. Non-employee directors receive an annual retainer of $40,000. Our Lead Independent Director is paid an additional annual retainer of $20,000. The chair of our Audit Committee is paid an additional annual retainer of $20,000, and members of our Audit Committee other than the chair are paid an additional annual retainer of $10,000. The chair of our

16

Compensation Committee is paid an additional annual retainer of $15,000, and members of our Compensation Committee other than the chair are paid an additional annual retainer of $7,500. The chair of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is paid an additional annual retainer of $10,000, and members of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee other than the chair are paid an additional annual retainer of $5,000. In May 2018, our board of directors approved an annual retainer of $50,000 for the independent Chairperson.

In addition to the compensation described above, each new non-employee director who joins our board of directors, upon election to our board of directors, is granted an initial restricted stock unit award covering shares of our common stock with a target value of $400,000 using intrinsic value. Each initial restricted stock unit award will vest over a three-year period with 1/3 of the restricted stock units scheduled to vest on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date, subject to the director’s continued service as of each such date.

In addition, all non-employee directors will receive, on the date of each of our annual stockholder meetings, an annual restricted stock unit award covering shares of our common stock with a target value of $220,000 using intrinsic value (with the calculation of the value of such awards to be determined on the same day that the Compensation Committee approves the awards). Each annual restricted stock unit award will vest upon the earlier of (i) the first anniversary of the date of grant; and (ii) the date of the next annual meeting of shareholders, in each case subject to the director’s continued service as of such date.

To align directors’ interests with those of our stockholders, each non-employee director on our board of directors is expected to accumulate and hold a number of shares of our common stock with a value equal to at least five times his or her annual cash retainer for service on our board of directors (not including retainers for serving as a member or chair of any committee of our board of directors), and to maintain this minimum amount of stock ownership throughout his or her tenure on our board of directors. Existing and new non-employee directors are expected to achieve the applicable level of ownership by February 2022.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Policies and Procedures for Related Party Transactions

We have adopted a formal written policy that our executive officers, directors, holders of more than 5% of any class of our voting securities, and any member of the immediate family of and any entity affiliated with any of the foregoing persons, are not permitted to enter into a related party transaction with us, in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000, without the approval or ratification of our Audit Committee. In approving or rejecting any such proposal, our Audit Committee will take into account, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third-party under the same or similar circumstances and the extent of the related party’s interest in the transaction.

Related Party Transactions

In addition to the compensation arrangements discussed in the section titled “Executive Compensation,” in fiscal 2017, we were party to the following transactions in which the amount involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000, and in which any director, director nominee, executive officer or holder of more than 5% of any class of our voting stock, or any member of the immediate family of or entities affiliated with any of them may be deemed to have or have had a direct or indirect material interest.

Subscription Services Agreements

Steffan C. Tomlinson, a member of our board of directors since May 2017, served as Chief Financial Officer of Palo Alto Networks, Inc. from February 2012 to March 2018. We have a vendor and a customer

17

relationship with Palo Alto Networks, Inc. that we consider arms-length on terms that are consistent with similar transactions with our other similarly situated customers. In fiscal 2017, we incurred expenses of approximately $0.7 million to Palo Alto Networks in hardware, license, maintenance and support fees, while we billed Palo Alto Networks, Inc. approximately $0.3 million for our services. In addition, we expect to pay approximately $0.7 million and receive approximately $0.3 million in such fees for fiscal 2018.

Investments by Firms Affiliated with our Directors

In 2017, we entered into an agreement with Silver Lake, pursuant to which Silver Lake and certain other parties invested an aggregate of $300.0 million in principal amount of 5.75% senior convertible notes due July 1, 2021 (the “2021 Notes”). In connection with the investment, Silver Lake maintains a right to nominate two individuals for election to our board of directors, subject to certain limitations. Joseph Osnoss, a managing director of Silver Lake, was appointed to our board of directors in December 2017 as one of Silver Lake’s representatives. In May 2018, Silver Lake nominated Elisa A. Steele for election to our board of directors as the second of its two representatives.

In addition, in connection with the sale of the 2021 Notes, we entered into an investment agreement with Silver Lake providing Silver Lake with the option to purchase all or a portion of any equity securities, or instruments convertible into or exchangeable for any equity securities, in any proposed offerings by us until the earlier of June 2019 or such time as Silver Lake no longer has a representative and no longer has rights to have a representative on our board of directors.

As of February 28, 2018, $300.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 2021 Notes was outstanding. We did not pay any interest on the 2021 Notes in fiscal 2017.

Indemnification Agreements

We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our directors and officers. The indemnification agreements and our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws require us to indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware General Corporation Law.

Transactions with Cornerstone OnDemand Foundation

We helped form the Cornerstone OnDemand Foundation, or the Foundation, in 2010. The Foundation’s board of directors has five members, including Adam Miller, our Chief Executive Officer. None of the other four directors is an officer or employee of the Company. In fiscal 2017, we provided at no charge certain resources to the Foundation, with approximate value of $3.4 million. In addition, we expect to provide at no charge certain resources to the Foundation with approximate value of $3.5 million in 2018.

Transactions with The Corner Restaurant

Our CEO, has an ownership interest in The Corner Restaurant. In fiscal 2017, we incurred expenses of approximately $0.3 million to The Corner Restaurant related to use of the restaurant and its services. In addition, we expect to incur expenses of approximately $0.3 million for fiscal 2018. However, our CEO is not involved in purchasing decisions we make with respect to The Corner Restaurant.

18

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN

BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information as of February 28, 2018 with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by (i) each person we believe beneficially holds more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock based solely on our review of SEC filings; (ii) each director and nominee for director; (iii) each named executive officer listed in the table entitled “Summary Compensation Table” under the section entitled “Executive Compensation”; and (iv) all directors and executive officers as a group. The information provided in the table is based on the Company’s records, information filed with the SEC and information provided to us, except where otherwise noted.

As of February 28, 2018, 57,313,233 shares of our common stock were issued and outstanding. In computing the number of shares of stock beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, we deemed outstanding shares subject to options held by that person that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of February 28, 2018, and shares issuable upon the vesting of restricted stock units within 60 days of February 28, 2018. However, we did not deem these shares to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Unless otherwise indicated, all persons named as beneficial owners of our common stock have sole voting power and sole investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned. Unless otherwise noted below, the address of each stockholder listed on the table is c/o Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc., 1601 Cloverfield Blvd., Suite 620 South, Santa Monica, California 90404.

19

20

21

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Biographical data as of February 28, 2018 for each of our current executive officers is set forth below, excluding Mr. Miller’s biography, which is included under the heading “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance” above.

Executive Officers

Brian L. Swartz, age 45, has served as our Chief Financial Officer since May 2016. Prior to joining us, Mr. Swartz served as Chief Financial Officer at zulily, one of the largest e-commerce companies in the United States from June 2015 to May 2016. Prior to joining zulily, Mr. Swartz served most recently as Chief Financial Officer at Apollo Education Group, a global private-sector education company, from December 2006 to May 2015. Before his role with Apollo, Mr. Swartz was VP and Corporate Controller at Eagle Picher, an industrial manufacturing and technology company. He began his career in public accounting and earned his C.P.A. (inactive). Mr. Swartz holds a B.A. in Business Administration with an Accounting major from the University of Arizona.

Adrianna Burrows, age 42, has served as our Chief Marketing Officer since March 2018. Prior to this role, Ms. Burrows served as Chief Marketing Officer of Stack Exchange Inc., a provider of a network of question-and-answer websites, from January 2016 to February 2018. From November 2015 to December 2015, Ms. Burrows served as a paid executive marketing consultant for Finer GTM LLC. From July 2010 to October 2015, Ms. Burrows served in various marketing positions at Microsoft Corporation, a software company, including as a General Manager and Partner. Ms. Burrows holds a B.A. in Communications from the University of Washington.

Mark Goldin, age 56, has served as our Chief Technology Officer since June 2010. Prior to joining us, Mr. Goldin served as Chief Technology Officer at DestinationRx, Inc., a healthcare data management company, from September 2009 to June 2010. From August 2005 to September 2008, Mr. Goldin was Chief Operations and Technology Officer at Green Dot Corporation, a financial services company. Prior to Green Dot, from December 1992 to August 2005, Mr. Goldin served as Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer at Thomson Elite, a provider of technology solutions for professional services firms and currently part of Thomson Reuters Corporation.

Jeffrey Lautenbach, age 49, has served as our President, Global Field Operations since January 2018. Prior to this role, Mr. Lautenbach served as President Worldwide Field Operations of Jive Software, Inc., a provider of business communication and collaboration solutions, from August 2015 to July 2017. From February 2014 to August 2015, Mr. Lautenbach was Chief Revenue Officer at HC1, Inc., a provider of cloud-based healthcare relationship management solutions. From December 2012 to February 2014, Mr. Lautenbach served as President CRM of SAP SE, a software company. From January 2011 to December 2012, Mr. Lautenbach held the position of SVP Enterprise Commercial Sales Americas at salesforce.com, inc., a provider of cloud-based CRM solutions. Prior to salesforce, Mr. Lautenbach served in a variety of roles over 19 years at IBM, most recently managing more than 1,300 employees while serving as Vice President, West IMT for the Software Group. Mr. Lautenbach holds a B.A. in Marketing from Xavier University and an M.B.A. from the University of Illinois.

Adam Weiss, age 40, has served as our Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel since February 2018, and is responsible for our legal, human resource, administration, and privacy functions worldwide. Prior to

22

this role, Mr. Weiss held the positions of Senior Vice President, Administration and General Counsel from April 2016 to January 2018, Vice President, Business Affairs and General Counsel from April 2013 to March 2016, and General Counsel from May 2006 to March 2013. Before joining us, from 2003 to April 2006, Mr. Weiss was an associate with the law firm of Lurie, Zepeda, Schmalz & Hogan. Mr. Weiss holds a B.A. in Economics and Political Science from Stanford University and a J.D. from UCLA School of Law.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Introduction

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides information about the material components of our compensation program for our named executive officers, or NEOs, and is intended to provide a better understanding of our compensation practices and decisions that affected the compensation payable in 2017 to our NEOs.

Our NEOs for 2017 were Adam Miller, our Chief Executive Officer; Brian Swartz, our Chief Financial Officer; David Carter, who retired as our Chief Sales Officer in March 2018; Vincent Belliveau, our Executive Vice President and General Manager of EMEA; Mark Goldin, our Chief Technology Officer; and Kirsten Helvey, who retired as our Chief Operating Officer in March 2018.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

BUSINESS AND COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

Key Operational Highlights

Strategic Advances and Business Accomplishments

In 2017, we continued to be a leading global provider of learning and human capital management software delivered as Software-as-a-Service (“SaaS”). We are one of the world’s largest cloud computing companies with approximately 35.3 million users across 3,250 clients using the system in 192 countries and 43 different languages. We help organizations around the globe recruit, train and manage their employees. Our human capital management platform combines the world’s leading unified talent management solutions with state-of-the-art analytics and HR administration solutions to enable organizations to manage the entire employee lifecycle. Our focus on continuous learning and development helps organizations to empower employees to realize their potential and drive success. Key highlights of our strategic advances and business accomplishments throughout the year include:

Our focus remains on empowering people, organizations and communities with our comprehensive talent management solutions.

23

Financial Performance

We finished another year of good execution as shown by revenue growth and by delivering our second year of non-GAAP profitability. We achieved the following financial results in fiscal year 2017:

Please see the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 27, 2018, for a more detailed discussion of our fiscal 2017 financial results and, beginning on page 51 of that Annual Report on Form 10-K, a discussion regarding our key metrics.

Key Compensation Highlights

The success of our business is driven by rapidly changing technology and the services we can provide to our customers. In order to stay competitive in our industry, our compensation packages are designed to attract, retain and incentivize our executive team and to align our compensation practices with the creation of value for our stockholders. We believe our compensation programs are effectively designed to reward our executives when our business performs well, which in turn strengthens the ties between our performance and stockholder value.

Below, we provide a summary of the key compensation related actions and outcomes from 2017, which we believe in the aggregate demonstrates our strong commitment to pay for performance.

24

Overview of Our Pay and Performance Alignment

Emphasis on At Risk Compensation

The compensation of our executive officers is weighted towards variable, performance-based incentive awards. In 2017, 91% of total target direct compensation for the CEO consisted of variable compensation (in the form of both short-term cash incentives and long-term equity incentives connected to either financial performance or variations in the Company’s share price). For the other NEOs in aggregate, 87% of total target direct compensation consisted of variable pay.

Realizable Value Aligned with Stockholder Experience

Realizable pay provides another perspective to help demonstrate the alignment of our NEOs’ financial interests with that of our stockholders. Given that shifts in our stock price can cause stock-based awards to have significantly different values over time than their original value on their date of grant, the Compensation Committee considers it important to focus on the amount of pay that is realizable by our NEOs at any point in time. This view of pay and performance helps our Compensation Committee to ensure our executive pay program appropriately aligns with the experiences of our stockholders over time.

As highlighted above, our compensation program delivered more than 85% of target compensation to our NEOs in the form of incentives that are tied to our future financial and stock performance (relative and absolute). As a result, realizable compensation, defined as the value of base salary paid, actual bonuses earned, options and restricted stock units valued at the Company’s share price as of December 31, 2017, and outstanding performance shares based on our most current projected financial performance level for the performance periods ending 2018 and 2019, will vary from the compensation targeted by the Compensation Committee. Over the three-year period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2017 realizable compensation was 49% of target total direct compensation for the CEO and 68% of target total pay, on average, for Messrs. Belliveau, Carter, Goldin and Ms. Helvey (NEOs with three full years of compensation data). The difference in targeted compensation and realizable compensation over the 3-year period can be attributed to a combination of factors, most notably:

CEO Compensation mix 9% 9% 83% 91% base salary short-term cash incentives long-term equity incentives performance-based pay other neo compensation mix 13% 12% 74% 87% base salary short-term cash incentives long-term equity incentives performance-based pay

25

Executive Compensation Governance Practices

We continued our commitment to strong corporate governance practices that ensure our executive compensation program aligns with stockholder interests.

Compensation Decision Making Process and Governance Framework

Our Pay Philosophy and Governance Framework

Our compensation philosophy is to provide programs that attract, retain and motivate key employees who are critical to our long-term success. We strive to provide compensation packages to our executives that are competitive, reward the achievement of our business objectives, and align executive and stockholder interests by enabling our executives to acquire equity ownership in our business.

Peer Group and Its Use

In determining the appropriate level and form of compensation for 2017, our Compensation Committee reviewed publicly available market data relating to the cash and equity compensation of a peer group of publicly-held software companies of similar size and business focus. Our Compensation Committee reviewed and considered the data presented by Semler Brossy, which served as the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant in 2017, but did not engage in any benchmarking or targeting of any specific levels of pay.

Our Compensation Committee reviewed the peer group in early 2017 for evaluating 2017 compensation decisions. The following companies comprised the peer group for compensation purposes in 2017:

The 2017 peer group was determined after taking into account, as applicable, the following criteria:

26

Quantitative screens were primarily used as guides to inform our decision process on reviewing current or potential peers. Companies not explicitly meeting the quantitative screening criteria were additionally reviewed from a business fit perspective to ensure that they would be an appropriate company within the peer group.

As compared to our peer group for 2016, Demandware, Inc., Marketo Inc., NetSuite Inc., SPS Commerce, Inc. and Veeva Systems were removed due to size or as they are no longer public companies. LogMeIn, Inc., Medidata Solutions, Inc. and Paycom Software, Inc. were added to the 2017 peer group after taking into account the factors outlined above.

Under the direction of our Compensation Committee, Semler Brossy provided competitive market data to review our compensation programs, identify trends in executive cash and equity compensation and make recommendations as to appropriate levels of compensation for 2017. While Semler Brossy’s analysis and recommendations were a strong factor in determining 2017 compensation levels, our Compensation Committee used its discretion in setting appropriate compensation levels and, in some cases, selected compensation levels that were different from those recommended by Semler Brossy.

Role of Compensation Committee

Our Compensation Committee is composed of the following individuals: R. C. Mark Baker, Harold W. Burlingame and Dean Carter. Our Compensation Committee operates under a written charter that establishes the duties and authority of our Compensation Committee. Our Compensation Committee reviews the terms of its charter annually, and its charter was most recently updated in April 2013. The fundamental responsibilities of our Compensation Committee include the following:

Role of Independent Compensation Consultant

Our Compensation Committee has the authority to engage its own advisors to assist it in carrying out its responsibilities and engaged Semler Brossy to serve as its independent advisor with respect to its compensation programs, including the reasonableness of cash compensation and long-term incentive grants for NEOs and other senior executives, advising on the market compensation environment, appropriate peer companies, compensation trends, and advising non-employee director compensation levels and program design. Semler Brossy reported directly to our Compensation Committee and only interacted with management as necessary. Semler Brossy did not perform work for us other than pursuant to its engagement by our Compensation Committee. Semler Brossy’s fees were paid by us. In April 2017, the Compensation Committee assessed the independence of Semler Brossy and concluded that its work had not raised any conflict of interest.

27

Role of Management

Members of our management team attend our Compensation Committee meetings when invited. At the outset of the 2017 annual compensation decision process, our CEO reviewed the compensation of our executive management team (including the NEOs other than himself) and made recommendations to the members of our Compensation Committee with respect to base salary, bonus and commission targets for the executives (but not for his own compensation). Our Compensation Committee retains the authority to accept or reject the CEO’s compensation recommendations for each and all executive officers, and, where it deems appropriate, make adjustments to the CEO’s recommendations when determining appropriate compensation levels. All decisions regarding the CEO’s compensation for 2017 were reviewed and approved by our Compensation Committee outside of his presence.

Say-on-Pay Vote

At our annual meeting of stockholders in June 2015, we held a non-binding advisory stockholder vote on the compensation of our NEOs, commonly referred to as a say-on-pay vote. Approximately 32.1% of stockholder votes were cast in favor of our 2015 say-on-pay proposal. In response to this vote and direct feedback from stockholders, the Compensation Committee undertook several actions in 2015 and 2016, which are described in more detail in this document:

We believe that these changes, together with our existing compensation practices, have addressed the stockholder concerns that have been shared with us, and demonstrate our commitment to a compensation program designed to help drive the Company’s long-term value creation.

We currently hold say-on-pay votes every three years, as approved by our stockholders in a non-binding advisory vote at our annual meeting of stockholders in June 2015. Accordingly, this year our stockholders are being asked to approve the compensation of our named executive officers on a non-binding, advisory basis, as described in greater detail under Proposal 3 herein. This year, we will also hold a non-binding advisory vote to approve the frequency of future non-binding say-on-pay votes. We urge stockholders to vote to hold advisory votes to approve the compensation of our named executive officers every year.

Components of Our NEO Compensation

The compensation program for our NEOs consists of:

28

We believe the combination of these elements provides a compensation package that attracts and retains qualified individuals, links individual performance to the performance of our business, focuses the NEOs’ efforts on the achievement of both our short-term and long-term objectives as a company, and aligns the NEOs’ interests with those of our stockholders. Our Compensation Committee determines the appropriate use and weight of each component of NEO compensation based on its views of the relative importance of each component in achieving our overall objectives and position-specific objectives relevant to each NEO.

Base Salaries

We provide a base salary to our NEOs to compensate them for services rendered on a day-to-day basis. The base salaries of our NEOs are reviewed on an annual basis. The following table provides the base salaries of our NEOs for 2016 and 2017:

In reviewing the salaries of our executives, our Compensation Committee reviewed and considered various market data presented by Semler Brossy as well as the factors described above under the heading “— Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Compensation Decision Process.” We did not engage in any benchmarking or targeting of any specific levels of pay when determining base salary levels. In connection with its review of 2017 base salaries, our Compensation Committee determined that no adjustment of any NEO’s base salary was necessary as the NEO’s current base salary was appropriate relative to market data and each executive’s experience, as well as past, current and anticipated contributions to our success.

Short-Term Incentives (Cash Bonuses and Sales Commissions)

Our short-term incentive program seeks to balance our NEOs’ focus on our company goals as well as reward their individual performance through the use of an executive compensation plan and separate sales commission plans, as appropriate for each NEO’s position. Each of Messrs. Miller, Swartz and Goldin and Ms. Helvey participated in an executive compensation plan under which bonuses were eligible to be earned upon our achievement of specified performance goals. Considering their respective sales positions within our organization, Mr. Carter and Mr. Belliveau participated in individualized sales commission plans that are similar to the plans used for all of our sales employees, as described below. Our executive compensation plan and our executive sales commission plans are treated as “non-equity incentive plan compensation” for purposes of the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table below.

2017 Executive Compensation Plan

For 2017, our Compensation Committee established an executive compensation plan for Messrs. Miller, Swartz and Goldin and Ms. Helvey (the “2017 Executive Compensation Plan”). Under the terms of the 2017 Executive Compensation Plan, each NEO (other than Messrs. Carter and Belliveau) was entitled to receive a bonus that would vary in size depending on our success in meeting certain performance thresholds and targets with respect to a number of different performance metrics: revenue, billings, free cash flow and non-GAAP net

29

operating income. The 2017 Executive Compensation Plan also directs the Compensation Committee to review achievement under the plan if the U.S. dollar to British pound and U.S. dollar to Euro currency exchange rates fluctuate by more than two-and-one-half percent during fiscal 2017, and make appropriate adjustments in light of said currency fluctuations. These metrics are used because they directly measure our ability to execute on our strategic imperatives of expanding market share while achieving appropriate levels of profitability. We believe successful performance on these metrics will drive sustainable long-term stockholder value creation. Under this plan, no bonus payout for a particular performance metric would be earned unless the performance threshold for that metric was met, and bonus payouts would be calculated linearly for achievement between the performance thresholds and targets.

The following table shows the performance metrics and weighting established by our Compensation Committee for the 2017 Executive Compensation Plan:

The following tables show the target, minimum and maximum levels of performance and the bonus percentages corresponding with such levels of achievement for each NEO established by our Compensation Committee in March 2017 for the 2017 Executive Compensation Plan:

30

Bonus Percentages for NEOs

The table below shows each NEO’s (other than Mr. Carter and Mr. Belliveau) bonus opportunity as a percentage of their respective base salaries that corresponds with the achievement of the performance targets above. For example, the 25% minimum in the “Revenue” column below represents that upon achievement of minimum performance with respect to the revenue metric, the individual’s bonus will be calculated based on 25% achievement of that particular performance metric.

To increase focus on operating results and to align the NEOs’ interests with those of our stockholders, our Compensation Committee determined that these performance metrics were appropriate measurements of our performance, as revenue and billings measures our growth rates, free cash flow measures the cash profitability and margin potential of our business, and non-GAAP net operating income measures our execution on expenditures relative to our revenue growth.

The following table shows the minimum, target, and maximum bonus amounts under the 2017 Executive Compensation Plan for each of Messrs. Miller, Swartz and Goldin and Ms. Helvey. To the extent that our achievement was greater or less than the specified targets, the bonus amounts payable to each individual would be increased or decreased, respectively, although our Compensation Committee retained discretion to adjust bonus payments in its sole discretion. Our Compensation Committee determined these target bonus amounts based on the reasons below and the compensation factors described above under the heading “— Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Compensation Decision Process.”

Each NEO’s 2017 target bonus amount as a percentage of base salary remained the same as that NEO’s 2016 target bonus amount. Our Compensation Committee determined that these bonus targets were appropriate based on its review of the compensation practices of our peer group and that they enabled us to appropriately proportion our NEOs’ total cash compensation with respect to performance-based compensation. For 2017, the maximum bonus opportunity for executives was increased from 175% of target to 200% of target to be consistent with the bonus programs of more than half of the compensation peer group.

31

In early 2018, our Compensation Committee reviewed the 2017 performance metrics to determine the level of achievement relative to each performance target and threshold amount. The 2017 achievement levels for the performance targets were as follows:

Accordingly, overall achievement relative to targets was approximately 75%. Individual payments under the 2017 Executive Compensation Plan were as follows:

Sales Commission Plan

Because much of Mr. Belliveau’s and Mr. Carter’s responsibilities are focused on sales of our solutions, our Compensation Committee determined that it would be more appropriate for Mr. Belliveau and Mr. Carter to participate in a sales commission plan with terms that correspond to the results achieved by their respective teams rather than in the 2017 Executive Compensation Plan described above. Mr. Belliveau and Mr. Carter therefore earned commissions based on the sales of their respective direct sales teams, with Mr. Belliveau’s commissions based on sales in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, and Mr. Carter’s commissions based on total direct sales in the United States, North America and Latin America. The commission targets were determined by our Compensation Committee based in part on the recommendations of our CEO, which took into account the compensation factors described above under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Compensation Decision Process.” Our Compensation Committee designed Mr. Belliveau’s and Mr. Carter’s commission structure both to reward them for their past success and to support our retention efforts.

During 2017, Mr. Belliveau and Mr. Carter were eligible to receive commissions based on total sales in their respective sales territories. The rate at which commissions are earned by each sales executive is highest in the first year of each client agreement and decreases each year thereafter and depends on whether the client agreement is a new agreement or a renewal. For 2017, our Compensation Committee established a sales quota for each of the sales executives. Mr. Belliveau’s total quota for 2017 was $67,500,000 in first-year revenue from new sales in assigned territories, and Mr. Carter’s quota for 2017 was $147,500,000 in first-year revenue from new sales in assigned territories. To the extent that a sales executive exceeded his quota for revenue in 2017, such

32

sales executive’s commission rate was increased with respect to revenue invoiced and received by us in excess of the quota. For 2018, we changed our sales commission plans to focus exclusively on annual recurring revenue.

In addition, each sales executive was also eligible for a bonus if he met certain milestone sales targets by the dates specified in each executive’s commission plan. If Mr. Belliveau achieved specified milestones by specified dates, he would be eligible to receive a bonus of $23,958 upon completion of each milestone (based on a $1.1979 U.S. Dollar to Euro exchange rate as of January 1, 2018). If Mr. Carter achieved all specified milestones by specified dates, he would be eligible to receive a total bonus of $20,000 upon completion of all milestones.

For 2017, the following table shows the targets and amounts earned by Mr. Belliveau and Mr. Carter under his 2017 sales commission plan:

Long-Term Incentives

We grant equity awards to motivate and reward our NEOs for achieving long-term performance goals as reflected in the value of our common stock, which we believe aligns the interests of our NEOs with those of our stockholders. Such awards typically have been granted once per year. The Compensation Committee typically grants a combination of performance-based restricted stock units and time-based restricted stock units to further incentivize our executives to drive long-term growth and promote alignment of our stockholders’ interests with the financial interests of our NEOs.

In determining 2017 equity incentive awards for our NEOs, our Compensation Committee considered a number of factors, including the executive’s position with us and his or her total compensation package as well as the executive’s contribution to the success of our financial performance and the equity compensation practices of our peer group. Our Compensation Committee granted equity awards to reward both the achievement of long-term goals and to provide a powerful retention tool. Performance-based restricted stock units increase

33

stockholder value and reward achievement of our long-term strategic goals since the value of these awards is subject to achievement of those goals, while time-based restricted stock units provide individuals with immediate retention value because they have no purchase price, but are subject to service-based vesting.

2017 Grants

On March 5, 2017, we granted Messrs. Miller, Swartz, Carter, Belliveau and Goldin and Ms. Helvey awards of restricted stock units and performance-based restricted stock units (“PSUs”). For Mr. Miller, we targeted an equity mix of 40% RSUs and 60% PSUs, and for Messrs. Swartz, Carter, Belliveau and Goldin and Ms. Helvey, we targeted an equity mix of 67% RSUs and 33% PSUs.

The restricted stock units will be fully vested over a four-year period with 1/4th of the restricted stock units scheduled to vest on each of the first four anniversaries of the grant date, in all cases subject to the individual continuing to provide services to us through each such date.

The PSUs will measure performance during the three-year period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2019, and will become fully vested based on actual performance over that period. Performance will be based on three-year average revenue growth and three-year average free cash flow margin. The Compensation Committee granted these incentive awards to our NEOs to provide an additional, long-term incentive and retention tool and to align our compensation practices with the creation of value for our stockholders by tying vesting of the PSUs to the Company’s financial performance growth targets measured over a three-year period. The Compensation Committee believes that strong combined performance on these metrics is vital for the Company’s long-term success.

Fiscal 2018 Long-Term Incentive Program Modifications

In November 2017, we announced a strategic plan with the objective of better positioning us for long-term growth and increasing stockholder value. In connection with the plan, we are (i) sharpening our focus on recurring revenue growth; (ii) driving operating margin and free cash flow improvement; (iii) developing new recurring revenue streams, including e-learning content subscriptions; (iv) bolstering the leadership team; and (v) strengthening governance to help best execute on this strategic transformation.

To ensure alignment between NEOs and our focus on combined subscription revenue growth and unlevered free cash flow margin to reach the “Rule of 40” by 2020, the Compensation Committee, after reviewing a number of alternatives, decided to modify the long-term incentive program for 2018 for certain NEOs, excluding Adam Miller. Key features of the new program include:

34

Given Mr. Miller’s significant ownership stake, the Compensation Committee determined that his participation in the one-time award was neither necessary nor appropriate. Therefore, Mr. Miller’s long-term incentive structure will not change materially for fiscal 2018. Mr. Miller will continue to receive annual equity grants, however, to ensure alignment both with our strategy and other NEOs. Mr. Miller’s annual PSU performance targets will be determined using the same metrics used for the other NEO PSUs, and will vest on a similar schedule to that outlined above.

We believe this new program sufficiently aligns NEOs with our new strategy, our commitment to reach the “Rule of 40” by 2020, and with stockholders’ interests, as a significant amount of NEO current and future pay is at risk.

COMPENSATION GOVERNANCE

Stock Ownership Guidelines

In 2016, we adopted formal stock ownership guidelines for certain employees, including our NEOs. Under our ownership guidelines, our CEO is expected to accumulate and hold a number of shares of the Company’s common stock with a value equal to ten times his annual base salary, and our other NEOs are expected to accumulate and hold a number of shares of the Company’s common stock with a value equal to three times his or her annual base salary. The NEOs are expected to satisfy the ownership guidelines within five years from the adoption of the guidelines (or the individual’s date of hire for individuals hired after the effective date). For the purposes of these guidelines, stock ownership includes shares owned outright by the NEO or his or her immediate family members; shares held in trust, limited partnerships, or similar entities for the benefit of the NEO or his or her immediate family members, but beneficially owned by the NEO; shares held in retirement or deferred compensation accounts for the benefit of the NEO or his or her immediate family members; shares subject to restricted stock units or other full-value awards (“Full-Value Awards”) that have vested, but for which the NEO has elected to defer the settlement of the award to a date beyond the date of vesting; and shares subject to Full-Value Awards that are unvested and for which the only requirement to earn the award is continued service to the Company. In addition, in the event the applicable ownership threshold is not satisfied as of or following the applicable deadline, NEOs are required to hold 50% of net after-tax shares until the applicable guideline has been met. All of our NEOs currently meet their respective ownership requirements under the stock ownership guidelines.

Anti-Hedging and Pledging Policy

Our insider trading policy includes an anti-hedging policy, which prohibits our executive officers and directors from engaging in transactions in publicly-traded options, such as puts and calls, and other derivative securities with respect to the Company’s securities unless otherwise permitted by our board of directors. This prohibition extends to any hedging or similar transaction designed to decrease the risks associated with holding Company securities. Stock options, stock appreciation rights, and other securities issued pursuant to Company benefit plans or other compensatory arrangements with the Company are not subject to this prohibition.

Our insider trading policy also includes an anti-pledging policy, which prohibits our executive officers and directors from pledging Company securities as collateral for loans.

35

Compensation Recovery Policies

In April 2016, we adopted a clawback policy applicable to our executive officers. If a majority of the independent members of our board of directors determines that an officer’s misconduct caused us to materially restate all or a portion of our financial statements, our board of directors may require the officer to repay incentive compensation that would not have been payable absent the material restatement. This policy applies to all incentive compensation, excluding equity awards granted prior to the adoption of the policy, based on financial statements filed during the three years prior to the material restatement. Our Compensation Committee intends to revisit our clawback policy after the SEC adopts final rules implementing the requirements of Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

Employment Contracts, Termination of Employment and Change-In-Control Agreements

Our board of directors believes that maintaining a stable and effective management team is essential to our long-term success and achievement of our corporate strategies, and is therefore in the best interests of our stockholders. We have entered into employment agreements or Change of Control Severance Agreements with each of our NEOs that provide for, in certain instances, base salary, bonuses and/or sales commissions, employee benefit plan participation, and severance or other payments upon a qualifying termination of employment or change of control. These agreements provide the NEOs with assurances of specified severance benefits in the event that their employment is terminated and such termination is a qualifying termination. For more detail, see “Offer Letters and Employment Agreements; Potential Payments Upon Termination, Change in Control or Upon Termination Following Change in Control.”

We recognize that these severance benefits may be triggered at any time. Nonetheless, we believe that it is imperative to provide these individuals with these benefits to secure their continued dedication to their work, notwithstanding the possibility of a termination by us, and to provide them with additional incentives to continue employment with us. In determining appropriate severance payment and benefit levels for our NEOs, our Compensation Committee and our board of directors relied on a number of factors, including their experience with and understanding of current market practice, relative severance packages within the Company, and current severance arrangements. The level of benefits and triggering events to receive such benefits were chosen to be broadly consistent with our Compensation Committee’s and our board of directors’ view of prevailing competitive practices. The final severance payment and benefit levels were determined after extensive negotiations with each NEO and were evaluated in terms of the overall compensation packages for each NEO.

We also recognize the possibility that we may in the future undergo a change in control, and that this possibility, and the uncertainty it may cause among our NEOs, may result in their departure or distraction to the detriment of our company and our stockholders. Accordingly, our board of directors and Compensation Committee decided to take appropriate steps to encourage the continued attention, dedication and continuity of certain key executives to their assigned duties without the distraction that may arise from the possibility or occurrence of a change in control. As a result, we have entered into agreements with certain of our NEOs that provide additional benefits in the event of a change in control. For more detail, see “Offer Letters and Employment Agreements; Potential Payments Upon Termination, Change in Control or Upon Termination Following Change in Control.”

We consider these severance protections to be an important part of our NEOs’ compensation. These arrangements are consistent with our overall compensation objectives because we believe such arrangements are competitive with arrangements offered to executives by companies with whom we compete for executives and are critical to achieve our business objective of management retention. We believe that this severance protection is competitively necessary to retain our NEOs and is imperative to (i) secure the continued dedication and objectivity of our NEOs, including in circumstances where we may undergo a change of control, and (ii) provide the NEOs with an incentive to continue employment with us and motivate them to maximize our value for the benefit of our stockholders.

36

Compensation Risk Assessment

In establishing and reviewing our overall compensation program, our Compensation Committee and our board of directors consider whether the compensation program and its various elements encourage or motivate our NEOs or other employees to take excessive risks. We believe that our compensation program and its elements are designed to encourage our employees to act in our long-term best interests and are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our business. In particular, our Compensation Committee has reviewed the elements of our executive compensation to determine whether any portion of executive compensation encouraged excessive risk taking and concluded:

Benefits and Tax Considerations

Broad-Based Employee Benefits

Our compensation program for our NEOs also includes employee benefits that are generally available to our other employees. These benefits include medical, dental, vision, long-term disability and life insurance benefits, as well as flexible spending accounts. We also periodically provide meals on premise to employees in our offices. Our NEOs receive these benefits on the same basis as our other full-time U.S. employees. Offering these benefits serves to attract and retain employees, including our NEOs. We anticipate that we will periodically review our employee benefits programs in order to ensure that they continue to serve these purposes and remain competitive.

We have established a tax-qualified Section 401(k) retirement savings plan for our employees generally, subject to standard eligibility requirements. Under this plan, participants may elect to make pre-tax contributions to the plan of up to a certain portion of their current compensation, not to exceed the applicable statutory income tax limitation. We provide for a match of employees’ contributions in an amount equal to 50% of an employee’s contributions up to $2,400 per year. Matching amounts vest over four years, beginning at the employee’s employment start date. Accordingly, all matching amounts will have fully vested on the fourth anniversary of the start date, regardless of when the matching amounts were contributed. The plan currently qualifies under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, such that contributions to the plan, and income earned on those contributions, are not taxable to participants until withdrawn from the plan.

We have also established the 2010 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or ESPP, which our board of directors has adopted and which our stockholders approved. Our NEOs are eligible to participate in the ESPP on the same basis as our other full-time U.S. employees.

Tax Considerations

Prior to January 1, 2018, based on the limitations imposed by Section 162(m) of Internal Revenue Code, we generally could not deduct compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officer and to certain other highly compensated officers that exceeded $1,000,000 per person in any fiscal year for federal income tax purposes, unless it is “performance-based,” as defined under Section 162(m). As a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that became law in late 2017, the number of individuals covered by Section 162(m) has been expanded to include the

37

Company’s principal financial officer and the exception for performance-based compensation has been eliminated. While mindful of the benefit to us of the full deductibility of compensation, our Compensation Committee has believed historically that it should not be constrained by the requirements of Section 162(m) where those requirements would impair flexibility in compensating the members of our executive team in a manner that can best promote our corporate objectives, which our Compensation Committee believes aligns our executive officers’ interests with our stockholders’ interests, and thus is in the best interests of our stockholders. While we cannot predict how the Section 162(m) deductibility limit may affect our compensation program in future years, we intend to maintain an approach to executive compensation that strongly links pay to performance.

We have not provided our executives or directors with any gross-up or other reimbursement for tax amounts that these individuals might pay pursuant to Section 280G or Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. Section 280G and related Internal Revenue Code sections provide that executive officers, directors who hold significant stockholder interests, and certain other service providers, could be subject to significant additional taxes if they receive payments or benefits in connection with a change in control that exceeds certain limits, and also that we or our successor could lose the ability to deduct on our corporate taxes the amounts subject to the additional tax. In addition, Section 409A imposes significant taxes on an executive officer, director or other service provider who receives “deferred compensation” that does not meet the requirements of Section 409A.

Compensation Committee Report

The following report of our Compensation Committee shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to otherwise be considered “filed” with the SEC, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) or the Exchange Act except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing.

Our Compensation Committee consists of three non-employee directors: Messrs. Baker, Burlingame and Carter, each of whom our board of directors has determined is independent under the applicable listing standards of Nasdaq. Our Compensation Committee has the duties and powers described in its written charter adopted by our board of directors. A copy of our Compensation Committee’s charter is available on the Investor Relations page of our website at investors.cornerstoneondemand.com, under “Governance.”

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” with management and, based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to our board of directors that the section entitled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” be included in this proxy statement.

Members of our Compensation Committee

R.C. Mark Baker

Harold W. Burlingame, Chairman

Dean Carter

38

Summary Compensation Table

The following table summarizes the compensation information for our NEOs for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017, December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2015.

39

CEO Pay Ratio

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, we are providing disclosure regarding the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Miller, our CEO, to that of our median employee. SEC rules allow us to select a methodology for identifying our median employee in a manner that is most appropriate based on our size, organizational structure and compensation plans, policies and procedures.

In determining our median employee, we chose December 31, 2017 as the determination date, which is the last day of our most recently completed fiscal year. As of that date, we employed 1,891 employees globally. Our median employee was determined based on total compensation (base salary, equity-based compensation reflecting grant date fair value and cash incentive compensation, where applicable), derived from our payroll and stock administration systems for, our entire global employee population (excluding our CEO) for the twelve months ending at December 31, 2017. In determining our median employee, we did not use any of the exemptions permitted under SEC rules, and we did not rely on any material assumptions, adjustments (e.g., cost-of-living adjustments) or estimates (e.g., statistical sampling) to identify our median employee or determine annual total compensation or any elements of annual total compensation for our median employee or our CEO. Amounts paid in foreign currency were converted to United States dollars using the average exchange rates for the twelve month period ending December 31, 2017.

We calculated the median employee’s annual total compensation in accordance with the requirements of Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K. Based on our calculation for 2017, our CEO’s annual total compensation for 2017 was $5,602,311 and our median employee’s annual total compensation for 2017 was $121,530. Accordingly, we estimated our CEO Pay Ratio for 2017 to be 46:1. This pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K.

40

Fiscal 2017 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The table below summarizes information concerning all plan-based awards granted to our NEOs during fiscal 2017, which ended on December 31, 2017.

41

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth information regarding stock options and stock awards held by our NEOs as of December 31, 2017.