10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
0-25732
(Commission File Number)
Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
|
|
13-4146982
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
2000 Westchester Avenue, Purchase, New York
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
10577
(Zip Code) |
(914) 701-8000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be
filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the
distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes þ No o
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS: As of June 30, 2008, there were 21,744,810 shares of the
registrants Common Stock outstanding.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
367,538 |
|
|
$ |
477,309 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $3,483 and $3,481,
respectively |
|
|
137,548 |
|
|
|
134,014 |
|
Prepaid maintenance |
|
|
61,306 |
|
|
|
72,250 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
26,712 |
|
|
|
35,053 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
30,768 |
|
|
|
24,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
623,872 |
|
|
|
743,319 |
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
841,512 |
|
|
|
594,872 |
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits and other assets |
|
|
39,050 |
|
|
|
41,038 |
|
Lease contracts and intangible assets, net |
|
|
37,042 |
|
|
|
37,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
1,541,476 |
|
|
$ |
1,417,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
25,587 |
|
|
$ |
29,600 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
161,078 |
|
|
|
163,831 |
|
Deferred gain |
|
|
152,836 |
|
|
|
151,742 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital leases |
|
|
30,332 |
|
|
|
28,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
369,833 |
|
|
|
373,617 |
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and capital leases |
|
|
457,097 |
|
|
|
365,619 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
16,115 |
|
|
|
21,570 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
97,871 |
|
|
|
93,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other liabilities |
|
|
571,083 |
|
|
|
480,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
9,802 |
|
|
|
13,477 |
|
Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $1 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no
shares issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized;
21,912,851 and 21,796,484 shares issued, 21,744,810 and
21,636,250 shares outstanding (net of treasury stock), at June
30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively |
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
|
349,657 |
|
|
|
341,537 |
|
Receivable from issuance of subsidiary stock |
|
|
(39,543 |
) |
|
|
(77,065 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost; 168,041 and 160,234 shares, respectively |
|
|
(7,018 |
) |
|
|
(6,599 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
1,860 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
285,583 |
|
|
|
289,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
590,758 |
|
|
|
549,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
1,541,476 |
|
|
$ |
1,417,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
1
Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Revenues |
|
$ |
438,780 |
|
|
$ |
372,627 |
|
|
$ |
811,801 |
|
|
$ |
727,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft fuel |
|
|
207,031 |
|
|
|
122,123 |
|
|
|
351,522 |
|
|
|
234,434 |
|
Salaries, wages and benefits |
|
|
52,845 |
|
|
|
61,438 |
|
|
|
111,748 |
|
|
|
123,188 |
|
Maintenance, materials and repairs |
|
|
40,271 |
|
|
|
37,937 |
|
|
|
93,843 |
|
|
|
83,219 |
|
Aircraft rent |
|
|
40,869 |
|
|
|
38,702 |
|
|
|
80,327 |
|
|
|
77,123 |
|
Ground handling and airport fees |
|
|
19,096 |
|
|
|
18,385 |
|
|
|
37,622 |
|
|
|
35,706 |
|
Landing fees and other rent |
|
|
20,213 |
|
|
|
18,288 |
|
|
|
38,930 |
|
|
|
36,018 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
12,817 |
|
|
|
10,062 |
|
|
|
21,183 |
|
|
|
19,637 |
|
Gain on disposal of aircraft |
|
|
(2,726 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(2,726 |
) |
|
|
(1,005 |
) |
Travel |
|
|
12,882 |
|
|
|
12,610 |
|
|
|
26,609 |
|
|
|
24,604 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
(239 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,675 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
22,169 |
|
|
|
21,883 |
|
|
|
45,466 |
|
|
|
46,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
425,228 |
|
|
|
341,391 |
|
|
|
800,849 |
|
|
|
679,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
13,552 |
|
|
|
31,236 |
|
|
|
10,952 |
|
|
|
48,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
(3,118 |
) |
|
|
(3,838 |
) |
|
|
(8,476 |
) |
|
|
(7,259 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
11,709 |
|
|
|
11,274 |
|
|
|
23,092 |
|
|
|
22,522 |
|
Capitalized interest |
|
|
(2,274 |
) |
|
|
(1,121 |
) |
|
|
(4,049 |
) |
|
|
(1,963 |
) |
Other (income) expense, net |
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
(271 |
) |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-operating expenses |
|
|
6,924 |
|
|
|
6,044 |
|
|
|
10,706 |
|
|
|
13,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
6,628 |
|
|
|
25,192 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
35,334 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
5,098 |
|
|
|
(17,993 |
) |
|
|
4,047 |
|
|
|
(14,048 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,530 |
|
|
$ |
43,185 |
|
|
$ |
(3,801 |
) |
|
$ |
49,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
2.04 |
|
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
|
$ |
2.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
2.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
|
$ |
2.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
21,506 |
|
|
|
21,175 |
|
|
|
21,465 |
|
|
|
21,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
21,656 |
|
|
|
21,452 |
|
|
|
21,465 |
|
|
|
21,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(3,801 |
) |
|
$ |
49,382 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
21,183 |
|
|
|
19,637 |
|
Accretion of debt discount |
|
|
3,632 |
|
|
|
3,519 |
|
Amortization of operating lease discount |
|
|
919 |
|
|
|
918 |
|
Provision for (release of) allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(502 |
) |
|
|
555 |
|
Gain on disposal of aircraft |
|
|
(2,726 |
) |
|
|
(1,005 |
) |
Deferred taxes |
|
|
2,886 |
|
|
|
(25,607 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
3,758 |
|
|
|
4,108 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
(3,675 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
496 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
|
|
4,785 |
|
|
|
(8,030 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
26,459 |
|
|
|
43,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(274,424 |
) |
|
|
(30,400 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of aircraft |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
Insurance proceeds |
|
|
5,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
|
(268,524 |
) |
|
|
(24,400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from loan |
|
|
107,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock option exercises |
|
|
3,162 |
|
|
|
4,050 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
(673 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation expense |
|
|
1,201 |
|
|
|
1,563 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of subsidiary stock |
|
|
38,616 |
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
Payments on debt |
|
|
(17,525 |
) |
|
|
(18,842 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
132,294 |
|
|
|
61,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(109,771 |
) |
|
|
80,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period |
|
|
477,309 |
|
|
|
231,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period |
|
$ |
367,538 |
|
|
$ |
312,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2008
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (the Financial
Statements) are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q
and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. As permitted by the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the SEC), the Financial Statements exclude certain footnote disclosures
normally included in audited consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). In the opinion of management, the Financial
Statements contain all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring items, necessary to fairly state
the financial position of Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. (Holdings or AAWW) and its
consolidated subsidiaries as of June 30, 2008, the results of operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and
2007. The Financial Statements include the accounts of Holdings and its consolidated subsidiaries.
All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The year end balance sheet data
was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. The Financial Statements
should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes
thereto for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Holdings that was filed with the SEC on February 28, 2008 (the 2007 10-K).
Holdings is the parent company of two principal operating subsidiaries, Atlas Air, Inc.
(Atlas), which is wholly owned, and Polar Air Cargo Worldwide, Inc. (Polar), of which Holdings
has a 51% economic interest and 75% voting interest. On June 28, 2007, Polar issued shares
representing a 49% economic interest and a 25% voting interest to DHL Network Operations (USA),
Inc. (DHL), a subsidiary of Deutsche Post AG (DP). Prior to that date, Polar was wholly owned
by Holdings and was the parent company of Polar Air Cargo, Inc. (Polar LLC). Holdings, Atlas,
Polar and Polar LLC are referred to collectively as the Company. The Company provides air cargo
and related services throughout the world, serving Asia, the Middle East, Australia, Europe, South
America, Africa and North America through: (i) contractual lease arrangements including contracts
through which the Company leases an aircraft to a customer and provides value-added services
including, crew, maintenance and insurance (ACMI); (ii) airport-to-airport scheduled air cargo
service (Scheduled Service); (iii) military charter (AMC Charter); (iv) seasonal, commercial
and ad-hoc charter services (Commercial Charter); and (v) dry leasing or sub-leasing of aircraft
and engines (Dry Leasing or Dry Lease). The Company operates only Boeing 747 freighter
aircraft.
The Companys quarterly results have in the past been subject to seasonal and other
fluctuations and the operating results for any quarter are therefore not necessarily indicative of
results that may be otherwise expected for the entire year.
Except for per share data, all dollar amounts are in thousands unless otherwise noted.
2. General
DHL
In March 2008, Atlas entered into a three year ACMI agreement and related agreements with
Polar for two Boeing 747-400 aircraft, beginning on March 21, 2008. Polar entered into an interim
blocked space agreement (the Interim BSA) with DHL covering these two aircraft commencing on
March 30, 2008 and expiring on October 27, 2008. In addition, on March 21, 2008, Polar and DHL
amended and restated the original blocked space agreement entered into in June 2007 (the Amended
BSA) to include these two additional aircraft as part of that agreement beginning on the
expiration of the Interim BSA. See Note 3 of the 2007 10-K for discussion of the blocked space
agreement. Under the Interim BSA, Polar began express network flying (Express Network ACMI) on
March 30, 2008 and the direct contribution for such flying is included as part of the ACMI
reporting segment (see Note 4 for further discussion).
Investments
The Company holds a minority interest (49%) in a private company, which is accounted for under
the equity method. The June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 aggregate carrying value of the
investment was $5.8 million and $5.6 million, respectively, and was included within Deposits and
other assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
4
Atlas has Dry Leased three owned aircraft to this company. The leases have terms that mature
in the third quarter of 2009. The carrying value of these leased aircraft as of June 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007 was $165.8 million and $168.1 million, respectively. The related accumulated
depreciation as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was $18.9 million and $16.5 million,
respectively. The leases provide for payment of rent and a provision for maintenance costs
associated with the aircraft. Total rental income for the three aircraft was $10.8 million and
$11.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $21.6 million
and $22.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Property and equipment, net
Property and equipment, net consisted of the following at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flight equipment |
|
$ |
682,929 |
|
|
$ |
583,468 |
|
Ground equipment |
|
|
24,057 |
|
|
|
23,040 |
|
Purchase deposits for flight equipment |
|
|
232,230 |
|
|
|
75,026 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(97,704 |
) |
|
|
(86,662 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
841,512 |
|
|
$ |
594,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, included in purchase deposits for flight equipment is
capitalized interest of $9.2 million and $5.2 million, respectively.
On January 11, 2008, AAWW entered into an aircraft purchase agreement under which AAWW or its
designee agreed to acquire two Boeing 747-400 aircraft. The acquisition of such aircraft was
completed on May 6, 2008. The aircraft include one production Boeing 747-400 freighter, which
entered service on June 12, 2008, and one passenger configured Boeing 747-400 aircraft that will be
converted to freighter configuration and is expected to enter service in the third quarter of 2008.
The purchase price for these aircraft was approximately $167.5 million, which includes conversion
costs, of which $152.3 million has been paid. The remaining $15.2 million will be paid upon
completion of the freighter conversion.
In February 2008, one of the Companys Boeing 747-200 aircraft (tail number N527MC) on a
short-term ACMI lease to a customer was damaged due to improper shipper packaging of a load which damaged the hull. The
plane landed safely but as a result of this incident the airframe was damaged beyond
economic repair. Atlas negotiated a net $5.9 million cash-in-lieu-of-repair settlement with its
insurance carriers and received the insurance proceeds in June 2008. The Company removed the
engines and other certain high value rotable parts, which were transferred into rotable inventory.
The remainder of the airframe is being sold for scrap metal. Since the settlement proceeds
exceeded the net book value of the airframe after salvaging certain rotable parts, the Company
recorded a gain of $2.7 million in the second quarter of 2008.
In March 2007, the Company sold aircraft tail number N536MC for $6.0 million and recorded a
gain of approximately $1.0 million.
Concentration of Credit Risk and Significant Customers
United States Military Airlift Mobility Command (AMC) charters accounted for 25.5% and 25.6%
of the Companys total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively,
and 25.3% and 29.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Accounts
receivable from AMC were $19.6 million and $32.2 million at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
respectively. The International Airline of United Arab Emirates (Emirates) accounted for 14.1%
and 11.7% of the Companys total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, and 7.6% and 11.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Emirates accounted for 38.9% and 47.6% of the Companys ACMI revenues for the three months ended
June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and 40.1% and 47.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2008
and 2007, respectively. Accounts receivable from Emirates were $8.5 million and $13.4 million at
June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. No other customer accounted for 10% or more of
the Companys total operating revenues or accounts receivable during these periods.
Debt Discount
5
At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had $71.8 million and $75.4 million,
respectively, of unamortized discount related to fair market value adjustments recorded against
debt upon application of fresh-start accounting.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157). SFAS No. 157
establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to U.S. GAAP requiring use of fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about such fair
value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial assets and financial liabilities for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Issued in February 2008, FASB Staff Position
(FSP) 157-1 Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting
Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or
Measurement under Statement 13 (FSP 157-1) removed leasing transactions accounted for under
Statement 13 and related guidance from the scope of SFAS No. 157. FSP 157-2 Partial Deferral of
the Effective Date of Statement 157 (FSP 157-2), deferred the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for
all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2008.
The implementation of SFAS No. 157 for financial assets and financial liabilities, effective
January 1, 2008, did not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial position
and results of operations. The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 157 for
non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities on its consolidated financial position and
results of operations.
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid
to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement
date (exit price). SFAS No. 157 classifies the inputs used to measure fair value into the following
hierarchy:
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities |
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, or |
|
|
|
|
|
Unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in
markets that are not active, or |
|
|
|
|
|
Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability |
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability |
The Company endeavors to utilize the best available information in measuring fair value.
As of June 30, 2008, the Company did not have any financial assets or liabilities that were
impacted by SFAS No. 157.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an Amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115, (SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many
financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for
which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings. SFAS No. 159 is effective
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The implementation of this standard did not
have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements (SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160 establishes requirements for ownership
interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the Company (sometimes called minority
interests) be clearly identified, presented, and disclosed in the consolidated statement of
financial position within equity, but separate from the parents equity. All changes in the
parents ownership interests are required to be accounted for consistently as equity transactions
and any non-controlling equity investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries must be measured
initially at fair value. SFAS No. 160 is effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008. However, presentation and disclosure requirements must be
retrospectively applied to comparative financial statements. The Company is currently assessing the
impact of SFAS No. 160 on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
6
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161
expands quarterly disclosure requirements in SFAS No. 133 about an entitys derivative instruments
and hedging activities. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2008. The Company is currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 161 on its consolidated financial
position and results of operations.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made in the prior periods Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statement amounts and related note disclosures to conform to the current periods
presentation, primarily related to the classification of segments and commission income.
3. Notes Payable
On January 30, 2008, Atlas entered into a $270.3 million pre-delivery deposit payment (PDP)
financing facility with Norddeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale (the PDP Financing Facility), which
is intended to fund a portion of Atlas PDP obligations in respect of the first five aircraft to be
delivered to Atlas under its Boeing 747-8F purchase agreement with The Boeing Company (Boeing). These aircraft are scheduled for delivery between February and July
2010.
The facility is comprised of five separate tranches and is secured by certain of Atlas rights
in and to the purchase agreement, but only to the extent related to the first five aircraft
scheduled to be delivered thereunder. In the case of a continuing event of default by Atlas, the
lenders will have certain rights to assume Atlas position and accept delivery of the related
aircraft. Each tranche relating to each aircraft will become due on the earlier of (a) the date
the aircraft is delivered or (b) up to nine months following the last day of the scheduled delivery
month, depending on the cause of the delivery delay.
Funds available under the facility are subject to certain up-front and commitment fees, and
funds drawn under the facility bear interest at Libor plus a margin. The facility is guaranteed by
AAWW and is subject to typical and customary events of default. As of June 30, 2008, the Company
had borrowed $107.3 million under the facility and has unused availability of $163.0 million.
4. Segment Reporting
The Company has five reportable segments: ACMI, Scheduled Service, AMC Charter, Commercial
Charter and Dry Leasing. Each segment has different operating and economic characteristics which
are separately reviewed by the Companys senior management.
The Company is pursuing growth in its Dry Leasing business. The increasing importance of
this business has led senior management to classify Dry Leasing as a separate reportable segment
and in the first quarter of 2008, the Company formed a wholly owned subsidiary, based in
Ireland, for the purpose of Dry Leasing aircraft and engines. The Company currently Dry Leases
three Boeing 747-400s to an affiliate in which the Company owns a minority (49%) interest.
These aircraft are currently in the service of British Airways. In addition, the Company
currently has one Boeing 747-200 aircraft Dry Leased to a cargo operator. Previously, the
Company included Dry Lease revenue with Other Revenue and did not report the segment results
separately.
In addition to reporting the Dry Lease segment separately, in the first quarter of 2008 the
Company changed the principal economic performance metric it reports for each of its business
segments. Previously, the Company used Fully Allocated Contribution (FAC) as its economic
performance metric. FAC was computed by allocating all operating and non-operating costs to
segments, and only taxes, post-emergence costs and related professional fees, gains on the sale
of aircraft, and other unusual items were not allocated to segments. As part of the change,
Management has adopted an economic performance metric that shows profitability of each segment
after allocation of direct costs and ownership (Direct Contribution). Management believes
that Direct Contribution is a better measurement of segment profitability. Direct costs and
ownership include crew costs, maintenance, fuel, ground operations, sales costs, aircraft rent,
interest expense related to aircraft debt and aircraft depreciation. Direct Contribution shows
each segments contribution to corporate fixed costs. Although corporate fixed costs are not
allocated to each segment, the total corporate fixed costs are disclosed. Direct Contribution
consists of income (loss) before taxes, excluding post-emergence costs and related professional
fees, gains on the sale of aircraft, and unallocated fixed costs. Unallocated
7
fixed costs include corporate
overhead, non-aircraft depreciation, interest income, foreign exchange gains and losses and
other non-operating costs.
Management allocates the direct costs of aircraft operation and ownership among the various
segments based on the aircraft type and activity levels in each segment. Allocation methods are
standard activity-based methods commonly used in the industry.
The ACMI segment provides aircraft, crew, maintenance and insurance services, whereby
customers receive the use of an insured and maintained aircraft and crew in exchange for, in most
cases, a guaranteed monthly level of operation at a predetermined rate for defined periods of time.
The customer bears the commercial revenue risk and the obligation for other direct operating costs,
including fuel. Beginning on March 30, 2008, Polar began Express Network ACMI flying with two
aircraft for DHL. Under the terms of the Interim BSA, DHL is responsible for the commercial revenue
risk (yields and cargo loads) and bears all of the direct costs of operation, including fuel, for
these two aircraft. For segment reporting purposes all revenue derived from ACMI and related services provided to
Polar for Express Network ACMI operations have been reclassified from Scheduled Service to the ACMI
segment (see table below for reconciliation of revenue per the Financial Statements to revenue by
segment). All costs associated with providing such services have also been reclassified for
purposes of calculating Direct Contribution. Non-ACMI costs and an equal amount of revenue remain
in the Scheduled Service segment.
The Scheduled Service segment provides airport-to-airport scheduled air freight and available
on-forwarding services primarily to freight forwarding customers. The Company carries all of the
commercial revenue risk (yields and cargo loads) and bears all of the direct costs of operation,
including fuel. Distribution costs include direct sales costs through the Companys own sales force
and through commissions paid to general sales agents. Commission rates typically range between 2.5%
and 5% of commissionable revenue sold. Scheduled Service is highly seasonal, with peak demand
coinciding with the retail holiday season, which traditionally begins in September and lasts
through mid-December.
The AMC Charter segment provides full-planeload charter flights to the U.S. Military through
the AMC. The AMC Charter business is similar to the Commercial Charter business in that the Company
is responsible for the direct operating costs of the aircraft. However, in the case of AMC
operations, the price of fuel consumed during AMC flights is fixed by the military. The contracted
charter rates (per mile) and fuel prices (per gallon) are established and fixed by the AMC for
twelve-month periods running from October to September of the next year. The Company receives
reimbursement from the AMC each month if the price of fuel paid by the Company to vendors for AMC
missions exceeds the fixed price; if the price of fuel paid by the Company is less than the fixed
price, then the Company pays the difference to the AMC.
The Commercial Charter segment provides full-planeload airfreight capacity on one or multiple
flights to freight forwarders, airlines and other air cargo customers. Charters are typically paid
in advance and as with Scheduled Service, the Company bears the direct operating costs (except as
otherwise defined in the charter contracts).
The Dry Leasing segment provides for the leasing of aircraft and engines to customers.
The following table sets forth revenues and Direct Contribution for the Companys five
reportable business segments reconciled to operating income (loss) and income (loss) before income
taxes as required by SFAS No. 131, Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information, for the stated periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Express |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Express |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue per |
|
|
Network |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue per |
|
|
Network |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial |
|
|
ACMI |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Financial |
|
|
ACMI |
|
|
Segment |
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
Statements |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Statements |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACMI |
|
$ |
76,247 |
|
|
$ |
15,834 |
|
|
$ |
92,081 |
|
|
$ |
91,252 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
91,252 |
|
Scheduled Service |
|
|
213,423 |
|
|
|
(15,834 |
) |
|
|
197,589 |
|
|
|
144,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,245 |
|
AMC Charter |
|
|
111,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,756 |
|
|
|
95,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,471 |
|
Commercial Charter |
|
|
24,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,370 |
|
|
|
28,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,634 |
|
Dry Leasing |
|
|
12,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,984 |
|
|
|
13,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
438,780 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
438,780 |
|
|
$ |
372,627 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
372,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Express |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Express |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue per |
|
|
Network |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue per |
|
|
Network |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial |
|
|
ACMI |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Financial |
|
|
ACMI |
|
|
Segment |
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
Statements |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Statements |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Revenue |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACMI |
|
$ |
154,222 |
|
|
$ |
15,934 |
|
|
$ |
170,156 |
|
|
$ |
175,539 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
175,539 |
|
Scheduled Service |
|
|
372,897 |
|
|
|
(15,934 |
) |
|
|
356,963 |
|
|
|
270,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270,118 |
|
AMC Charter |
|
|
205,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205,740 |
|
|
|
211,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211,963 |
|
Commercial Charter |
|
|
52,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,864 |
|
|
|
44,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,329 |
|
Dry Leasing |
|
|
26,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,078 |
|
|
|
26,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
811,801 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
811,801 |
|
|
$ |
727,962 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
727,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
Direct Contribution: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACMI |
|
$ |
18,547 |
|
|
$ |
20,918 |
|
|
$ |
23,758 |
|
|
$ |
32,973 |
|
Scheduled Service |
|
|
(19,965 |
) |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
(29,515 |
) |
|
|
899 |
|
AMC Charter |
|
|
28,469 |
|
|
|
24,559 |
|
|
|
51,935 |
|
|
|
46,302 |
|
Commercial Charter |
|
|
(1,788 |
) |
|
|
2,796 |
|
|
|
(3,586 |
) |
|
|
2,261 |
|
Dry Leasing |
|
|
2,702 |
|
|
|
4,495 |
|
|
|
7,207 |
|
|
|
9,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Direct Contribution for
reportable segments |
|
|
27,965 |
|
|
|
53,005 |
|
|
|
49,799 |
|
|
|
91,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add back (subtract): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated fixed costs |
|
|
(24,063 |
) |
|
|
(27,850 |
) |
|
|
(52,279 |
) |
|
|
(57,121 |
) |
Gain on sale of aircraft |
|
|
2,726 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
2,726 |
|
|
|
1,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
6,628 |
|
|
|
25,192 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
35,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add back (subtract): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
(3,118 |
) |
|
|
(3,838 |
) |
|
|
(8,476 |
) |
|
|
(7,259 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
11,709 |
|
|
|
11,274 |
|
|
|
23,092 |
|
|
|
22,522 |
|
Capitalized interest |
|
|
(2,274 |
) |
|
|
(1,121 |
) |
|
|
(4,049 |
) |
|
|
(1,963 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
(271 |
) |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
13,552 |
|
|
$ |
31,236 |
|
|
$ |
10,952 |
|
|
$ |
48,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Commitments and Contingencies
On September 8, 2006, Atlas and Boeing entered into a purchase agreement (the Boeing
Agreement) providing for the purchase by Atlas of 12 Boeing 747-8F freighter aircraft. The
Boeing Agreement provides for deliveries of the aircraft to begin in 2010, with all 12 aircraft
expected to be in service by the end of 2011. In addition, the Boeing Agreement provides Atlas
with rights to purchase up to an additional 14 Boeing 747-8F aircraft, of which one is being
held under option. Committed expenditures under the Boeing Agreement, including agreements for
spare engines and related flight equipment and also including estimated amounts for contractual
price escalations, pre-delivery deposits and required option payments, will be $156.4 million
for the remainder of 2008, $185.3 million in 2009, $983.4 million in 2010 and $686.6 million in
2011.
Guarantees and Indemnifications
Restricted Deposits and Letters of Credit
At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had $7.1 million and $8.5 million,
respectively, of restricted deposits either pledged under standby letters of credit related to
collateral or for certain deposits required in the normal course of business for items, including,
but not limited to, foreign exchange trades, airfield privileges, judicial and credit card deposits
and insurance. These amounts are included in Deposits and other assets in the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Labor
The Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA) represents all of the Companys U.S. crewmembers
employed at both Atlas and Polar. Additionally, the Company employs 46 crewmembers through its
branch office in Stansted, England who are not represented by a union. Collectively, these
employees represent approximately 49.5% of the Companys workforce as of June 30, 2008. The
Company is subject to risks of work interruption or stoppage as permitted by the Railway Labor Act
of 1926 (the Railway Labor Act), and may incur additional administrative expenses associated with
union representation of its employees.
9
The Atlas collective bargaining agreement became amendable in February 2006. Polars
collective bargaining agreement with ALPA became amendable in April 2007. While both units have
filed Railway Labor Act Section 6 notices to begin negotiations for amended agreements, those
negotiations have been placed on hold in favor of completing the merger of the two crew forces as
more fully described below.
In November 2004, in order to increase efficiency and assist in controlling costs, the Company
initiated steps to merge the ALPA represented crewmember bargaining units of Atlas and Polar. The
processes for completing this merger are set forth in both the Atlas and Polar collective
bargaining agreements. Both agreements provide for a seniority integration process and the
negotiation of a single collective bargaining agreement (SCBA). This seniority list integration
process was completed by ALPA on November 21, 2006.
On July 11, 2007, the Company filed grievances under both the Atlas and Polar collective
bargaining agreements to compel the commencement of SCBA negotiations. In response, ALPA, on
behalf of the Atlas crew force, conceded the Companys grievance. They also executed a Merger
Protocol Letter of Agreement. However, ALPA, on behalf of the Polar crew force, rejected the
Companys grievance and disputed whether it could be required to combine SCBA negotiations and
whether the dispute could be scheduled for immediate arbitration. Initial hearings regarding the
merits of the Companys grievance were conducted on March 25 through March 27, 2008. Additional
hearing dates had been scheduled for July 15 through July 19, 2008. However, by letter dated May
23, 2008 ALPA presented the integrated seniority lists to the Company and directed the Atlas and
Polar Master Executive Councils (MEC) to begin the required negotiations for the SCBA. As a
result, the Company withdrew its grievance, without prejudice.
In accordance with the provisions of both the Atlas and Polar contracts, the parties are first
to engage in direct negotiations for a SCBA. If nine months after ALPA has presented the
integrated seniority lists to the Company any open contract issues remain, those issues are to be
resolved by final and binding interest arbitration. Currently, the Company anticipates the SCBA
direct negotiations and any required interest arbitration to be completed by the third quarter of
2009 at which time the SCBA and integrated seniority lists will be implemented.
By letter dated June 16, 2008, the Company was advised by the National Mediation Board (NMB)
that the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT) had filed a petition to replace ALPA as the
representative of the crewmembers of both Atlas and Polar. As part of its petition the IBT has
also asserted that Atlas and Polar constitute a single carrier for representation purposes under
the Railway Labor Act. The NMB is currently conducting its required investigation into this
matter. If the NMB determines that Atlas and Polar constitute a single carrier for representation
purposes and that the IBT has submitted the requisite showing of interest, it will conduct a
representation election to determine whether ALPA or the IBT will represent the Companys Atlas and
Polar crewmembers. If the NMB determines that Atlas and Polar do not constitute a single carrier
for representation purposes but that the IBT has submitted the requisite showing of interest to
represent the Companys Atlas crewmembers, it will conduct an election to determine whether ALPA or
the IBT will represent just the Companys Atlas crewmembers. A change in the certified
representative of the Companys crewmembers is not anticipated to affect the underlying collective
bargaining agreements. Additionally, a change in the certified representative of either or both
the Companys Atlas and Polar crewmembers will not affect the completion of the pending merger.
The Company anticipates this matter will be resolved in the fourth quarter of 2008.
Legal Proceedings
Except for the updated items below, information with respect to legal proceedings appears in
Note 12 of the 2007 10-K.
Department of Justice Investigation and Related Litigation
In February 2006, the United States Department of Justice (the DOJ) initiated an
investigation into the pricing practices of a number of cargo carriers, including Polar LLC (the
DOJ Investigation). In connection with this investigation, Polar LLC received a subpoena dated
February 14, 2006 requesting discovery of additional relevant documents. The Company is fully
cooperating with the DOJ in its investigation. Although the Company continues to engage in
discussions with the DOJ, there has been no formal action against the Company by the DOJ concerning
the matters that are the subject of the DOJ Investigation.
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission Inquiry
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (the ACCC) notified Polar LLC by letter
dated June 28, 2007 that it would be required to furnish information and to produce documents to
the ACCC in connection with matters that may constitute violations of certain provisions of the
Australian Trade Practices Act. Polar LLC has submitted
10
information and documentation to the ACCC as required by this initial request. Polar LLC has
submitted additional documentation to the ACCC in response to additional requests for information
received from the ACCC.
New Zealand Commerce Commission Inquiry
The New Zealand Commerce Commission (the Commission) notified Polar LLC by letter dated
November 8, 2007 that it would be required to provide information and to produce documents to the
Commission in connection with matters that may constitute violations of certain provisions of the
New Zealand Commerce Act 1986. Polar LLC has submitted information and documentation to the
Commission as required by this request.
Swiss Competition Commission Inquiry
By letter dated March 11, 2008, the Swiss Competition Commission (the Swiss Commission)
notified Polar LLC that it would be required to provide information and to produce documents in
connection with the Commissions investigation into the levy of fuel and other surcharges by
certain cargo carriers on flights into and out of Switzerland. The Swiss Commission is assessing
the impact of these surcharges on pricing and competition within the air freight market in
Switzerland. Polar LLC has submitted information and documentation to the Swiss Commission as
required by this request.
6. Income (Loss) Per Share and Number of Common Shares Outstanding
Basic income (loss) per share represents the income (loss) divided by the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during the measurement period. Diluted income (loss) per share
represents the income (loss) divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding
during the measurement period while also giving effect to all potentially dilutive common shares
that were outstanding during the period. Potentially dilutive common securities that would be
added to basic shares to arrive at weighted-average diluted shares consist of 0.1 million stock
options and shares of restricted stock for the six months ended June 30, 2008. The impact of these
options and restricted shares would be anti-dilutive for the six months ended June 30, 2008 due to
losses incurred and are not included in the diluted loss per share calculation. Anti-dilutive
options that are out of the money for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 were de minimis.
The calculation of basic and diluted income per share for the three and six months ended June
30 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,530 |
|
|
$ |
43,185 |
|
|
$ |
(3,801 |
) |
|
$ |
49,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic earnings per share: |
|
|
21,506 |
|
|
|
21,175 |
|
|
|
21,465 |
|
|
|
21,110 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
|
191 |
|
Restricted stock |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
21,656 |
|
|
|
21,452 |
|
|
|
21,465 |
|
|
|
21,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income per share |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
2.04 |
|
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
|
$ |
2.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income per share |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
2.01 |
|
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
|
$ |
2.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The calculation of diluted shares is calculated per SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share, and
reflects the potential dilution that could occur from stock options and restricted shares using the
treasury stock method and does not include restricted shares and units in which performance or
market conditions have not been satisfied of 0.3 million for the three and six months ended June
30, 2008 and 0.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007.
7. Taxes
The Companys effective tax rate consists of an expense of 76.9% and a benefit of 71.4% for
the second quarter of 2008 and 2007, respectively. The effective rate differs from the statutory
rate primarily due to losses incurred by Polar during the second quarter of 2008 for which no tax
benefit was recorded, the recognition of a deferred tax asset related to the Companys investment
in Polar during the second quarter of 2007, the non-deductibility of certain items for tax purposes
and the relationship of these items to the Companys projected operating results for the year.
Polar did not record income tax benefits related to its losses in the first and second quarters of
2008 because Polar has no prior period income to
11
apply
against these losses, and, therefore, the losses may only offset future income. Until Polar
generates future income, no tax benefit will be recorded.
The Company maintains a reserve for unrecognized income tax benefits consistent with the
requirements of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, (FIN 48).
The Companys FIN 48 reserve balance did not change from December 31, 2007 except for a de minimis
amount of interest expense related to this reserve during the first and second quarters of 2008.
The Company will maintain this reserve until its uncertain positions are reviewed and resolved or
until the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations, if earlier.
During the second quarter of 2008, the Internal Revenue Service commenced an income tax
examination related to the Companys consolidated federal income tax returns for 2005 and 2006. The
Service has not proposed any assessment of additional income taxes for those years. In Hong Kong,
the years 2001 through 2005 are under examination for Atlas, and the years 2003 through 2005 are
under examination for Polar Air Cargo, Inc. The tax authorities in Hong Kong have not proposed any
assessment of additional income taxes.
For federal income tax purposes, 2007 remains subject to examination. Certain tax attributes,
reflected on the Companys federal income tax returns as filed including NOLs, differ significantly
from those reflected in the Financial Statements. Such attributes are subject to future audit in
the event the IRS determines to examine any open tax years.
In the second quarter, the Company resolved an employment tax examination with the Internal
Revenue Service and released tax reserves and accrued interest totaling $4.5 million for 2004 and
2005, which is shown as a reduction in Operating expenses on the Statement of Operations. The
Internal Revenue Service is not conducting an employment tax examination for any other years.
8. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) included changes in the fair value of certain financial derivative
instruments, which qualify for hedge accounting, and unrealized gains and losses on certain
investments. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company did not have any
derivative instruments. The differences between net income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss)
for the three and six months ended June 30 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,530 |
|
|
$ |
43,185 |
|
|
$ |
(3,801 |
) |
|
$ |
49,382 |
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative
instruments,
net of taxes of $324 and $1,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(551 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,744 |
|
Other |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(388 |
) |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
2,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,494 |
|
|
$ |
42,797 |
|
|
$ |
(3,691 |
) |
|
$ |
51,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A roll-forward of the amounts included in Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of
taxes, is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other |
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Income |
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
1,750 |
|
Change in value during period, |
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2008 |
|
|
1,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in value during period, |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
1,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other is primarily composed of unrealized gains and losses on foreign currency translation.
9. Subsequent Events
12
On July 3, 2008, Atlas entered into a $58.4 million five year term loan agreement with BNP
Paribas and DVB Bank AG, secured by aircraft tail number N419, which was acquired on May 6, 2008
(see Note 2 for further discussion).
Atlas also received a commitment from the same banks for a $41.6 million five year term loan
to be secured by aircraft tail number N429, also acquired on May 6, 2008. That loan is expected to
close in the third quarter of 2008, when the conversion of the aircraft from passenger to freighter
is completed.
Funds available under the loan agreements are subject to certain up-front and commitment fees,
and funds drawn under the loan agreements will bear interest at Libor, plus a margin. The facility
is guaranteed by AAWW and is subject to typical and customary events of default.
13
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited
Financial Statements and notes thereto appearing in this report and our audited consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 included in our
2007 10-K.
In this report, references to we, our and us are references to AAWW and its
subsidiaries, as applicable.
Background
Certain Terms Glossary
The following terms represent industry-related items and statistics specific to the airline
and cargo industry sectors. They are used by management for statistical analysis purposes to better
evaluate and measure operating levels, results, productivity and efficiency.
|
|
|
ATM
|
|
Available Ton Miles, which represent the maximum available tons (capacity) per actual miles flown. It is
calculated by multiplying the available capacity (tonnage) of the aircraft by the miles flown by the aircraft. |
|
|
|
Block Hours
|
|
The time interval between when an aircraft departs the terminal until it arrives at the destination terminal. |
|
|
|
RATM
|
|
Revenue per ATM, which represents the average revenue received per available ton mile flown. It is calculated by
dividing operating revenues by ATMs. |
|
|
|
Revenue Per
Block Hour
|
|
Calculated by dividing operating revenues by Block Hours. |
|
|
|
RTM
|
|
Revenue Ton Mile, which is calculated by multiplying actual revenue tons carried by miles flown. |
|
|
|
Load Factor
|
|
The average amount of weight flown divided by the maximum available capacity. It is calculated by dividing RTMs by
ATMs. |
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
The average amount a customer pays to fly one ton of cargo one mile. It is calculated by dividing operating
revenues by RTMs. |
|
|
|
A Checks
|
|
Low level maintenance checks performed on aircraft at an interval of approximately 400 to 1,100 flight hours. |
|
|
|
C Checks
|
|
High level or heavy airframe maintenance checks, which are more intensive in scope than an A Checks and are
generally performed on 18 to 24 month intervals. |
|
|
|
D Checks
|
|
High level or heavy airframe maintenance checks, which are the most extensive in scope and are generally
performed on an interval of six to ten years or 25,000 to 28,000 flight hours, whichever comes first for Boeing
747-200s and six years for Boeing 747-400s. |
|
|
|
Direct
Contribution
|
|
Direct Contribution consists of income (loss) before taxes, excluding post-emergence costs and
related professional fees, gains on the sale of aircraft, and unallocated fixed costs. We evaluate performance and
allocate resources to our segments based upon this measure. |
Business Strategy
We are the leading provider of aircraft and outsourced aircraft operating solutions to the
global air freight industry. We manage and operate the worlds largest fleet of 747 freighters.
We provide a unique and compelling value proposition to our customers by giving them access to new
production freighters that deliver the highest reliability and lowest unit cost in the marketplace
combined with outsourced aircraft operating services that lead the industry in terms of quality and
global scale. Our customers include airlines, freight forwarders, the U.S. military and charter
brokers. We provide global services with operations in Asia, the Middle-East, Australia, Europe,
South America, Africa and North America.
14
We believe that demand for high-efficiency, wide-body freighter aircraft and related
outsourced aircraft operating solutions will increase due to growing international trade, in
particular growth in developing markets in Asia and South America. According to industry studies,
global cargo traffic, measured in revenue tonne-kilometers, is expected to triple over the next two
decades. As demand continues to increase, we believe that the supply of suitable freighter
aircraft will not keep pace with this increase in demand as a result of limited production
capacity, limited passenger-to-freight conversion capacity and the anticipated retirement of aging
aircraft currently operating in the world fleet.
As of June 30, 2008, our existing fleet of 38 wide-body, freighter aircraft, including 22
modern, high-efficiency, Boeing 747-400 aircraft, and our complementary operating solutions,
uniquely position us to benefit from the forecasted growth and increasing demand for wide-body
freighter airplanes in the global air freight market. Our market position is further enhanced by
our order of 12 new state-of-the-art Boeing 747-8F aircraft, scheduled to be delivered in 2010 and
2011. We are the only current provider of these aircraft to the outsourced freighter market. In
addition to these 12 aircraft, we also hold rights to purchase up to an additional 14 Boeing 747-8F
aircraft, providing us with flexibility to expand our fleet in response to market conditions.
We believe that the scale, scope and quality of our outsourced services are unparalleled in
our industry. The relative operating cost efficiency of our current 747-400F aircraft and future
747-8F aircraft compared with other wide body freighter aircraft, including their superior fuel
efficiency, create a compelling value proposition for our customers and position us well for growth
in both the wet and Dry Lease areas of our business.
Our primary services are:
|
|
|
Freighter aircraft leasing services, which encompasses the following: |
|
|
|
Fully outsourced aircraft operating solutions of aircraft, crew, maintenance
and insurance known as wet leasing or ACMI. An ACMI lease is a contract for the
use of one or more dedicated aircraft together with complementary operating
services. We typically contract these services for three to six year periods on
Boeing 747-400s and for shorter periods on Boeing 747-200s. Our outsourced
operating solutions include crew, maintenance and insurance for the aircraft,
while customers assume fuel, yield and demand risk; |
|
|
|
|
Express Network ACMI, where Polar provides outsourced airport-to-airport
wide-body cargo aircraft solutions to DHL. AAWW currently operates two aircraft,
and will operate a minimum of six additional dedicated Boeing 747-400 aircraft
servicing the requirements of DHLs trans-Pacific express operations. Polar will
also continue to provide scheduled air-cargo service on these aircraft to our
Scheduled Service air-cargo freight forwarders and other shipping customers; |
|
|
|
|
Aircraft and engine leasing solutions known as Dry Leasing. Dry Leasing usually
involves the leasing of aircraft to customers who are responsible for crew,
maintenance and insurance and who assume fuel, yield and demand risk. We typically
Dry Lease to third parties for one or more dedicated aircraft for three-to-five
year periods. In February 2008, Holdings formed a wholly owned subsidiary based in
Ireland, to further its Dry Leasing efforts. |
|
|
|
Charter services, which encompasses the following: |
|
|
|
AMC Charter services, where we provide air cargo services for the Air Mobility
Command, or the AMC; |
|
|
|
|
Commercial Charters, where we provide all-inclusive cargo aircraft charters to
brokers, freight forwarders, direct shippers and airlines. |
We look to achieve our strategy through:
|
|
|
Actively managing our fleet with a focus on leading-edge aircraft; |
|
|
|
|
Accelerating fleet growth and expanding our leasing business; |
|
|
|
|
Focusing on securing long-term contracts; |
15
|
|
|
Driving significant and ongoing efficiencies and productivity improvements; |
|
|
|
|
Selectively pursuing and evaluating future acquisitions and alliances. |
See Business Overview and Business Strategy and Outlook in the 2007 10-K for
additional information.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Financial Statements and
notes thereto and other financial information appearing and referred to elsewhere in this
report.
Operating Statistics
The table below sets forth selected operating data for the three months ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase / |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Change |
|
Block Hours |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACMI |
|
|
12,587 |
|
|
|
15,283 |
|
|
|
(2,696 |
) |
|
|
(17.6 |
%) |
Scheduled Service |
|
|
12,073 |
|
|
|
10,164 |
|
|
|
1,909 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
% |
AMC Charter |
|
|
5,249 |
|
|
|
5,459 |
|
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
(3.8 |
%) |
Commercial Charter |
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
|
1,837 |
|
|
|
(591 |
) |
|
|
(32.2 |
%) |
Other |
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
38.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Block Hours |
|
|
31,364 |
|
|
|
32,894 |
|
|
|
(1,530 |
) |
|
|
(4.7 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Per Block Hour |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACMI |
|
$ |
6,058 |
|
|
$ |
5,971 |
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
AMC Charter |
|
$ |
21,291 |
|
|
$ |
17,489 |
|
|
$ |
3,802 |
|
|
|
21.7 |
% |
Commercial Charter |
|
$ |
19,559 |
|
|
$ |
15,587 |
|
|
$ |
3,972 |
|
|
|
25.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scheduled Service Traffic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RTMs (000s) |
|
|
458,324 |
|
|
|
376,275 |
|
|
|
82,049 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
% |
ATMs (000s) |
|
|
717,365 |
|
|
|
593,816 |
|
|
|
123,549 |
|
|
|
20.8 |
% |
Load Factor |
|
|
63.9 |
% |
|
|
63.4 |
% |
|
|
5 bps |
|
|
|
|
|
RATM |
|
$ |
0.298 |
|
|
$ |
0.243 |
|
|
$ |
0.055 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
% |
Yield |
|
$ |
0.466 |
|
|
$ |
0.383 |
|
|
$ |
0.083 |
|
|
|
21.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scheduled Service and Commercial
Charter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average fuel cost per gallon *** |
|
$ |
3.61 |
|
|
$ |
2.12 |
|
|
$ |
1.49 |
|
|
|
70.3 |
% |
Fuel gallons consumed (000s) |
|
|
43,647 |
|
|
|
38,880 |
|
|
|
4,767 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
% |
AMC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average fuel cost per gallon |
|
$ |
2.86 |
|
|
$ |
2.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
|
27.1 |
% |
Fuel gallons consumed (000s) |
|
|
17,242 |
|
|
|
17,710 |
|
|
|
(468 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fleet (average during the period) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Aircraft count* |
|
|
29.9 |
|
|
|
32.0 |
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(6.6 |
%) |
Dry Leased ** |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
|
* |
|
This average does not include one Boeing 747-400 currently undergoing freighter conversion. |
|
** |
|
Dry Leased aircraft are not included in the operating fleet average aircraft count. |
|
*** |
|
Includes all into plane costs. |
Operating Revenues
The following table compares our operating revenues for the three months ended June 30:
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase / |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Change |
|
Operating Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACMI |
|
$ |
76,247 |
|
|
$ |
91,252 |
|
|
$ |
(15,005 |
) |
|
|
(16.4 |
%) |
Scheduled Service |
|
|
213,423 |
|
|
|
144,245 |
|
|
|
69,178 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
% |
AMC Charter |
|
|
111,756 |
|
|
|
95,471 |
|
|
|
16,285 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
% |
Commercial Charter |
|
|
24,370 |
|
|
|
28,634 |
|
|
|
(4,264 |
) |
|
|
(14.9 |
%) |
Dry Leasing revenue |
|
|
12,984 |
|
|
|
13,025 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
438,780 |
|
|
$ |
372,627 |
|
|
$ |
66,153 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACMI revenue decreased due to lower Block Hours, while revenue per Block Hour increased
slightly compared with the same quarter in the prior year. ACMI Block Hours were 12,587 for the
second quarter of 2008, compared with 15,283 for the second quarter of 2007, a decrease of 2,696
Block Hours, or 17.6%. Revenue per Block Hour was $6,058 for the second quarter of 2008, compared
with $5,971 for the second quarter of 2007, an increase of $87 per Block Hour, or 1.5%. The
reduction in Block Hours was due to a reallocation of one Boeing 747-400 to Express Network ACMI
service for DHL. This aircraft is one of the two Boeing 747-400s, which we began flying for DHL in
the second quarter of 2008 in Trans-Pacific Express Network ACMI service. The revenue and
operating statistics for the Express Network ACMI operation are included in Scheduled Service. We
redeployed one Boeing 747-200 at the end of its ACMI contract to the Charter business unit during
2008. During the three months ended June 30, 2008 there was an average of nine Boeing 747-400
aircraft and an average of 1.4 Boeing 747-200 aircraft supporting ACMI compared with an average of
ten Boeing 747-400 aircraft and an average of 2.9 Boeing 747-200 aircraft supporting ACMI for the
comparable period in 2007.
Scheduled Service revenue increased significantly due to higher revenue ton miles as well as
higher yields per revenue ton mile. RTMs in the Scheduled Service segment were 458.3 million on a
total capacity of 717.4 million ATMs in the second quarter of 2008, compared with RTMs of 376.3
million on a total capacity of 593.8 million ATMs in the second quarter of 2007. Block Hours were
12,073 in the second quarter of 2008, compared with 10,164 for the second quarter of 2007, an
increase of 1,909, or 18.8%. Load Factor was 63.9% with a Yield of $0.466 in the second quarter of
2008, compared with a Load Factor of 63.4% with a Yield of $0.383 in the second quarter of 2007,
representing an increase of 0.5 percentage points in load factor and an increase in yield of 21.7%.
Scheduled Service revenue and Block Hours in the second quarter of 2008 increased over the second
quarter of 2007 due to the addition of two Boeing 747-400 aircraft for the purpose of serving DHLs
Trans-Pacific Express Network ACMI. One of the aircraft was sourced from ACMI service and the
second aircraft was sourced via the deployment of a maintenance spare. The substantial increase in
Scheduled Service yield is primarily the result of the fuel surcharge increases that were
implemented consistent with the increasing price of fuel and the
start-up of Express Network ACMI during the second quarter of 2008. RATM
in our Scheduled Service segment was $0.298 in the second quarter of 2008, compared with $0.243 in
the second quarter of 2007, representing an increase of 22.6%.
AMC Charter revenue increased primarily as a result of the increase in the AMCs per ton mile
rate offset partially by a small reduction in Block Hours. The AMCs mileage rate includes the
cost of fuel, which increased significantly on a quarter-over-quarter basis. AMC Charter Block
Hours were 5,249 for the second quarter of 2008, compared with 5,459 for the second quarter of
2007, a decrease of 210 Block Hours, or 3.8%. Revenue per Block Hour was $21,291 for the second
quarter of 2008, compared with $17,489 for the second quarter of 2007, an increase of $3,802 per
Block Hour, or 21.7%. The AMC demand for Boeing 747 widebody cargo flying fell during the period, which drove the reduction in Atlas AMC Block Hours flown during the second quarter of 2008 compared with the second quarter of 2007.
The AMC raised the wide body cargo per ton mile rate in October 2007 by 2.3% in
the normal course of its annual rate making process. The AMC then raised its pegged fuel price
on February 1, 2008 to $2.70 per gallon and again on June 1, 2008 to $3.20 per gallon. The changes
from the rate making process as well as the interim increases in the pegged fuel price had the
effect of increasing the AMC revenue per Block Hour from $17,489 for the second quarter of 2007 to
$21,291 for the second quarter of 2008.
Commercial Charter revenue decreased as a result of a decrease in Block Hours that was
partially offset by an increase in Revenue per Block Hour. The increase in revenue per Block Hour
was the result of pricing increases effected to compensate for the higher cost of fuel. Commercial
Charter Block Hours were 1,246 for the second quarter of 2008, compared with 1,837 for the second
quarter of 2007, a decrease of 591, or 32.2%. Revenue per Block Hour was $19,559 for the second
quarter of 2008, compared with $15,587 for the second quarter of 2007, an increase of $3,972 per
Block Hour, or 25.5%. The decrease in Block Hours is partially the result of the retirement of one
Boeing 747-200 aircraft at the end of the first quarter of 2008 and the retirement of a damaged
Boeing 747-200 aircraft in February 2008 (see Note 2 to our Financial Statements for further
discussion).
17
Dry Leasing revenue was essentially unchanged on a year over year basis. The Company had
three Boeing 747-400 aircraft and one Boeing 747-200 aircraft on Dry Lease to third parties at
June 30, 2008 and three Boeing 747-400 aircraft and two Boeing 747-200 aircraft on Dry Lease to
third parties at June 30, 2007. We experienced customer defaults on three Dry Leased Boeing
747-200 aircraft in the second quarter of 2008 as the two customers leasing these aircraft filed
for protection under local insolvency laws. We have repossessed two of the three aircraft from
one customer and have been in negotiations regarding the lease of the third aircraft with the
other customer. All rents and maintenance reserves payable to us under these Dry Leases were
fully reserved against in the second quarter of 2008.
Total Operating revenue increased in the second quarter of 2008 compared with the second
quarter of 2007, primarily as a result of the fuel-driven price increases in the Scheduled
Service and AMC business and new Express Network ACMI flying, offset by reductions in ACMI and Commercial Charter flying.
Operating Expenses
The following table compares our operating expenses for the three months ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase / |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Change |
|
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft fuel |
|
$ |
207,031 |
|
|
$ |
122,123 |
|
|
$ |
84,908 |
|
|
|
69.5 |
% |
Salaries, wages and benefits |
|
|
52,845 |
|
|
|
61,438 |
|
|
|
(8,593 |
) |
|
|
(14.0 |
%) |
Maintenance, materials and repairs |
|
|
40,271 |
|
|
|
37,937 |
|
|
|
2,334 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
Aircraft rent |
|
|
40,869 |
|
|
|
38,702 |
|
|
|
2,167 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
Ground handling and airport fees |
|
|
19,096 |
|
|
|
18,385 |
|
|
|
711 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
Landing fees and other rent |
|
|
20,213 |
|
|
|
18,288 |
|
|
|
1,925 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
12,817 |
|
|
|
10,062 |
|
|
|
2,755 |
|
|
|
27.4 |
% |
Gain on disposal of aircraft |
|
|
(2,726 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
2,689 |
|
|
|
7,267.6 |
% |
Travel |
|
|
12,882 |
|
|
|
12,610 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
Minority interest |
|
|
(239 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
22,169 |
|
|
|
21,883 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expense |
|
$ |
425,228 |
|
|
$ |
341,391 |
|
|
$ |
83,837 |
|
|
|
24.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft fuel expense increased as a result of increased market prices for fuel. The average
fuel price per gallon for the Scheduled Service and Commercial Charter businesses was approximately
$3.61 for the second quarter of 2008, compared with approximately $2.12 for the second quarter of
2007, an increase of $1.49, or 70.3%. Fuel consumption for the Scheduled Service and Commercial
Charter businesses increased 4.8 million gallons or 12.3% to 43.6 million gallons for the second
quarter of 2008 from 38.9 million gallons during the second quarter of 2007. The average pegged
price per gallon for the AMC business was approximately $2.86 for the second quarter of 2008,
compared with approximately $2.25 for the second quarter of 2007, an increase of $0.61, or 27.1%.
AMC Fuel consumption decreased by 0.5 million gallons, or 2.6%, to 17.2 million gallons for the
second quarter of 2008 from 17.7 million gallons during the second quarter of 2007. The decrease in
our AMC fuel consumption is commensurate with the decrease of Block Hours in that segment. We do
not incur fuel expense in our ACMI service as the cost of fuel is borne by the customer.
Salaries, wages and benefits decreased due to the reduction in Block Hours as well as lower
profit sharing and incentive compensation accruals related to decreased profitability in the second
quarter of 2008 compared to the second quarter of 2007. In the second quarter of 2008, we also
released employment tax reserves related to the successful resolution of an examination with the
IRS resulting in a $2.7 million non-recurring benefit for the period.
Maintenance materials and repair increased as a result of increases in heavy maintenance.
Heavy maintenance activity reflects one additional Boeing 747-400 D Check offset by one less Boeing
747-200 C Check and one less CF6-50 engine overhaul. There were two C Checks on Boeing 747-200
aircraft in the second quarter of 2008, as compared with three C Checks during the second quarter
of 2007. For our Boeing 747-400 aircraft, there was one D Check in the second quarter of 2008
compared with none in the prior period. There were ten engine overhauls in the second quarter of
2008 compared with eleven during the second quarter of 2007. The average cost per overhaul on
engines increased during the second quarter of 2008 compared with 2007.
Aircraft rent increased primarily due to short-term engine leases and supplemental rent
expense for return conditions on two leased aircraft. In the second quarter, short-term engine leases added $0.9 million of
18
additional
rent expense and we recognized
$0.9 million in supplemental rent expense to reflect maintenance return condition obligations related to two of our leased Boeing 747-200 aircraft.
Ground handling and airport fees increased primarily as a result of an increase in Scheduled
Service flying. Scheduled Service has the highest departure driven ground handling expense of any
of our service types.
Landing fees and other rent increased primarily as a result of the increase in overfly fees
related to non-ACMI Block Hours. The higher overfly fees are the result of flying a more fuel
efficient route, allowing us to recover the additional overfly fees in fuel savings. We generally
do not incur landing fees in our ACMI service as the cost is borne by the customer.
Depreciation and amortization increased primarily as a result of increases in scrapping of
certain engine parts and rotables during overhaul. During the quarter we saw an increase of $2.3
million as a result of scrapping.
Gain on disposal of aircraft in the second quarter of 2008 was the result of the disposal of
aircraft tail number N527FT, which was damaged and subsequently
scrapped (except for engines and other valuable rotable parts) after we reached a settlement with our insurer (see Note 2 our Financial
Statements for further discussion). The gain represents the amount the insurance proceeds exceed
the net book value of the aircraft.
Travel increased as a result of an increase in the cost of airline ticket prices and increases
in travel requirements to meet our customers flight schedules.
Minority Interest is related to DHLs 49% ownership interest in Polar. The amount of Polar
loss attributable to DHL was $0.2 million for the quarter, which is reflected as a decrease in
our consolidated operating expenses.
Other operating expenses remained flat compared to the same quarter in the prior year. AMC
commission expense increased by approximately $2.4 million due to higher AMC mileage rates,
partially offset by a $1.8 million benefit from reduced interest from a settlement with the IRS on
an employment tax examination.
Total operating expense increased in the second quarter of 2008 compared with the second
quarter of 2007 primarily due to the increased price of aircraft fuel.
Non-operating Expenses
The following table compares our non-operating expenses for the three months ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase / |
|
Percent |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Change |
Non-operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
(3,118 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,838 |
) |
|
$ |
(720 |
) |
|
|
(18.8 |
%) |
Interest expense |
|
|
11,709 |
|
|
|
11,274 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
Capitalized interest |
|
|
(2,274 |
) |
|
|
(1,121 |
) |
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
|
102.9 |
% |
Other (income) expense, net |
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
(271 |
) |
|
|
(878 |
) |
|
|
(324.0 |
%) |
Interest income decreased in the quarter as a reduction in the effective yield on cash and
cash equivalents offset higher cash balances available for investing.
Interest expense increased on a year over year basis due to increased debt related to our
PDP financing facility on five of our twelve firm Boeing 747-8F orders. Long-term debt and
capital leases including the current portion averaged approximately $468.5 million in the second
quarter of 2008 compared with approximately $408.4 million in the second quarter of 2007.
Capitalized interest expense increased due to interest paid on our PDP financing facility
in 2008 and increases in PDP balances paid to Boeing related to our Boeing 747-8F orders.
Other (income) expense, net decreased primarily due to realized losses on the exchange of
foreign denominated currencies into U.S. dollars. The U.S. dollar strengthened slightly against
most foreign currencies during the second quarter of 2008 compared with the beginning of the
quarter.
Income taxes. The effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2008 was 76.9%. The comparable
period for 2007 had
19
a tax benefit associated with the issuance of Polar shares to DHL. Our rate for
the second quarter of 2008 differed from the statutory rate primarily due to losses incurred by our Polar subsidiary. Polar did not record
income tax benefits related to its losses in the second quarter of 2008 because Polar has no prior
period income and therefore these losses may only offset future income. Until future income
occurs, no tax benefit will be recorded. Our rates for the second quarter of 2007 reflect the
recognition of a deferred tax asset of $37.0 million offset by a tax reserve of $9.3 million
related to the transaction with DHL. (See Note 7 to our Financial Statements).
Segments
Management allocates the direct costs of aircraft operation and ownership among the reportable
segments based on the aircraft type and activity levels in each segment. Direct costs include crew
costs, maintenance, fuel, ground operations, sales costs, aircraft rent, interest expense related
to aircraft debt and aircraft depreciation. Certain of our costs are fixed, indirect costs. These
costs are not affected by fleet types or activity levels in our business segments and therefore
these costs are not allocated among segments. Examples of unallocated fixed costs are
administrative costs including operations administration, finance, human resources, information
technology, non-aircraft depreciation, and other non-operating costs.
For purposes of segment disclosure, management views the Direct Contribution from our Express
Network ACMI flying as a split between the ACMI contribution derived from the Flight Services
Agreement and other related services tied to the DHL Express Network ACMI operation, which is shown
in ACMI, and the residual contribution attributable to Scheduled
Service operations. The consolidation of Polar results
reflects Express Network ACMI flying as Scheduled Service revenue in our Financial Statements and
operating statistics. For segment reporting purposes all revenue
derived from ACMI and related services provided
to Polar for Express Network ACMI operations have been reclassified from Scheduled Service to the
ACMI segment (see table below for reconciliation of revenue per the Financial Statements to revenue
by segment). All costs associated with providing such services have also been reclassified for
purposes of calculating Direct Contribution. Non-ACMI costs and an equal amount of revenue remain
in the Scheduled Service segment.
Ownership costs are apportioned to segments based on aircraft equivalents (derived from Block
Hours flown) except for certain ACMI flying, which involves dedicated aircraft, in which case the
allocation is based on the number of dedicated aircraft. The following table compares our Direct
Contribution for segments (see Note 4 to our Financial Statements for the reconciliation to
operating income (loss) and our reasons for using Direct Contribution) for the three months ended
June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase / |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Change |
|
Direct Contribution: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACMI |
|
$ |
18,547 |
|
|
$ |
20,918 |
|
|
$ |
(2,371 |
) |
|
|
(11.3 |
%) |
Scheduled Service |
|
|
(19,965 |
) |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
(20,202 |
) |
|
|
(8,524.1 |
%) |
AMC Charter |
|
|
28,469 |
|
|
|
24,559 |
|
|
|
3,910 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
% |
Commercial Charter |
|
|
(1,788 |
) |
|
|
2,796 |
|
|
|
(4,584 |
) |
|
|
(163.9 |
%) |
Dry Leasing |
|
|
2,702 |
|
|
|
4,495 |
|
|
|
(1,793 |
) |
|
|
(39.9 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Direct Contribution |
|
$ |
27,965 |
|
|
$ |
53,005 |
|
|
$ |
(25,040 |
) |
|
|
(47.2 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated Fixed Costs |
|
$ |
24,063 |
|
|
$ |
27,850 |
|
|
$ |
(3,787 |
) |
|
|
(13.6 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACMI Segment
During the three months ended June 30, 2008 there was an average of eleven Boeing 747-400
aircraft (including two DHL Trans-Pacific Express Network ACMI aircraft) and an average of 1.4
Boeing 747-200 aircraft supporting ACMI compared with an average of ten Boeing 747-400 aircraft and
an average of 2.9 Boeing 747-200 aircraft supporting ACMI for the comparable period in 2007. ACMI
segment Direct Contribution decreased primarily due to ownership and maintenance costs. Ownership
costs increased as a result of more CF6-80 engine leases in support of our Boeing 747-400 fleet.
The increase in maintenance costs was primarily due to one additional Boeing 747-400 D-Check in the
second quarter of 2008 compared with the same quarter last year.
Scheduled Service Segment
Direct Contribution relating to the Scheduled Service segment decreased primarily as a result
of fuel price increases,
20
ownership, and maintenance costs. Ownership costs increased as a result
of more CF6-80 engine leases in support of our Boeing 747-400 fleet. The increase in maintenance costs was primarily due to one additional
Boeing 747-400 D-Check in the second quarter of 2008 compared with the same quarter last year as
well as higher engine maintenance expense. The increased costs were partially offset by
fuel-surcharge-driven Yield increases.
AMC Charter Segment
Direct Contribution relating to the AMC Charter segment increased slightly on fewer Block
Hours. Although the price of fuel increased significantly on a quarter-over-quarter basis, the AMC
reimburses the Company for its AMC fuel costs. The quarter-over-quarter increase in the AMC
mileage rate, which includes a standard profit margin allowed by the AMC, was partially offset by
cost increases in commissions, fuel and maintenance.
Commercial Charter Segment
Direct Contribution relating to the Commercial Charter segment declined as a result of a
decrease in Block Hours and increases in fuel costs that were not fully offset by fuel-driven price
increases. The decrease in Block Hours was partially due to the unavailability of one Boeing
747-200 equivalent during the second quarter of 2008.
Dry Leasing
Direct Contribution relating to the Dry Leasing segment declined due to an increase in costs
related to return condition accruals and the operating costs of our Dry Leasing subsidiary. In
addition, we experienced customer defaults on three Dry Leased Boeing 747-200 aircraft in the
second quarter of 2008 as the two customers leasing these aircraft filed for protection under local
insolvency laws. We have repossessed two of the three aircraft from one customer and have been in
negotiations regarding the lease of the third aircraft with the other customer. The two
repossessed aircraft have been made available for use by our AMC and Commercial Charter Segments.
All rents and maintenance reserves payable to us under these Dry Leases were fully reserved against
in the second quarter of 2008.
Unallocated Fixed Costs
Unallocated fixed costs for the second quarter of 2008 were $24.1 million compared to $27.9
million in the same quarter of the prior year. The decrease of $3.8 million, or 13.6%, is
primarily attributable to a one time benefit from the release of employment tax reserves and
reduced accrued interest from a settlement with the IRS on an employment tax examination
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
Operating Statistics
The table below sets forth selected operating data for the six months ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase / |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Change |
|
Block Hours |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACMI |
|
|
25,648 |
|
|
|
29,440 |
|
|
|
(3,792 |
) |
|
|
(12.9 |
%) |
Scheduled Service |
|
|
21,830 |
|
|
|
19,165 |
|
|
|
2,665 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
% |
AMC Charter |
|
|
9,822 |
|
|
|
12,310 |
|
|
|
(2,488 |
) |
|
|
(20.2 |
%) |
Commercial Charter |
|
|
2,989 |
|
|
|
3,037 |
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
%) |
Other |
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Block Hours |
|
|
60,708 |
|
|
|
64,306 |
|
|
|
(3,598 |
) |
|
|
(5.6 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Per Block Hour |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACMI |
|
$ |
6,013 |
|
|
$ |
5,963 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
% |
AMC Charter |
|
$ |
20,946 |
|
|
$ |
17,219 |
|
|
$ |
3,727 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
% |
Commercial Charter |
|
$ |
17,688 |
|
|
$ |
14,593 |
|
|
$ |
3,095 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scheduled Service Traffic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RTMs (000s) |
|
|
818,728 |
|
|
|
711,359 |
|
|
|
107,369 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
% |
ATMs (000s) |
|
|
1,280,232 |
|
|
|
1,116,934 |
|
|
|
163,298 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
% |
Load Factor |
|
|
64.0 |
% |
|
|
63.7 |
% |
|
3 bps |
|
|
|
|
|
RATM |
|
$ |
0.291 |
|
|
$ |
0.242 |
|
|
$ |
0.049 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
% |
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase / |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Change |
|
Yield |
|
$ |
0.455 |
|
|
$ |
0.380 |
|
|
$ |
0.075 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scheduled Service and Commercial
Charter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average fuel cost per gallon *** |
|
$ |
3.26 |
|
|
$ |
2.03 |
|
|
$ |
1.23 |
|
|
|
60.6 |
% |
Fuel gallons consumed (000s) |
|
|
81,313 |
|
|
|
71,695 |
|
|
|
9,618 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
% |
AMC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average fuel cost per gallon |
|
$ |
2.72 |
|
|
$ |
2.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
% |
Fuel gallons consumed (000s) |
|
|
31,858 |
|
|
|
39,588 |
|
|
|
(7,730 |
) |
|
|
(19.5 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fleet (average during the period) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Aircraft count* |
|
|
30.3 |
|
|
|
32.0 |
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(5.3 |
%) |
Dry Leased ** |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
Out-of-service ** |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
33.3 |
% |
|
|
|
* |
|
This average does not include one Boeing 747-400 currently undergoing freighter conversion. |
|
** |
|
Dry Leased and out-of-service aircraft are not included in the operating fleet average aircraft
count. |
|
*** |
|
Includes all into plane costs. |
Operating Revenues
The following table compares our operating revenues for the six months ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase / |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Change |
|
Operating Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACMI |
|
$ |
154,222 |
|
|
$ |
175,539 |
|
|
$ |
(21,317 |
) |
|
|
(12.1 |
%) |
Scheduled Service |
|
|
372,897 |
|
|
|
270,118 |
|
|
|
102,779 |
|
|
|
38.0 |
% |
AMC Charter |
|
|
205,740 |
|
|
|
211,963 |
|
|
|
(6,223 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
%) |
Commercial Charter |
|
|
52,864 |
|
|
|
44,329 |
|
|
|
8,535 |
|
|
|
19.3 |
% |
Dry Leasing revenue |
|
|
26,078 |
|
|
|
26,013 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
$ |
811,801 |
|
|
$ |
727,962 |
|
|
$ |
83,839 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACMI revenue decreased due to lower Block Hours, while revenue per Block Hour increased
slightly compared with the same period in the prior year. ACMI Block Hours were 25,648 for the
first half of 2008, compared with 29,440 for the first half of 2007, a decrease of 3,792 Block
Hours, or 12.9%. Revenue per Block Hour was $6,013 for the first six months of 2008, compared with
$5,963 for the first six months of 2007, an increase of $50 per Block Hour, or 0.8%. The reduction
in Block Hours was due to a reallocation of one Boeing 747-400 to Express Network ACMI Service for
DHL during the second quarter. This aircraft is one of the two Boeing 747-400s that we began
flying for DHL in the second quarter of 2008 in Trans-Pacific Express Network ACMI service. The
Block Hours and associated statistics for the Express Network ACMI operation are included in
Scheduled Service. We redeployed one Boeing 747-200 at the end of its ACMI contract to the Charter
business unit in March 2008. During the six months ended June 30, 2008 there was an average of 9.5
Boeing 747-400 aircraft and an average 1.8 Boeing 747-200 aircraft supporting ACMI compared with an
average of ten Boeing 747-400 aircraft and an average of 2.8 Boeing 747-200 aircraft supporting
ACMI for the comparable period in 2007.
Scheduled Service revenue increased significantly due to higher revenue ton miles as well as
higher yields per revenue ton mile. RTMs in the Scheduled Service segment were 818.7 million on a
total capacity of 1,280.2 million ATMs in the first half of 2008, compared with RTMs of 711.4
million on a total capacity of 1,116.9 million ATMs in the first half of 2007. Block Hours were
21,830 in the first half of 2008, compared with 19,165 for the first half of 2007, an increase of
2,665, or 13.9%. Load Factor was 64.0% with a Yield of $0.455 in the first half of 2008, compared
with a Load Factor of 63.7% with a Yield of $0.380 in the first half of 2007, representing an
increase of 0.3 percentage points in load factor and an increase in yield of 19.7%. Scheduled
Service Block Hours in the second half of 2008 increased over the second half of 2007 due to the
addition of two 747-400 aircraft during the second quarter for the purpose of serving DHLs
Trans-Pacific Express Network ACMI. One of the aircraft was sourced from ACMI service and the
second aircraft was sourced via the deployment of a maintenance spare. The prior period in 2007
was also affected by relatively soft demand in Trans-Pacific markets and the redeployment of
approximately one Boeing 747-400 from Scheduled Service to AMC to take advantage of
22
the strong AMC demand. The substantial increase in Scheduled Service yield is primarily the
result of fuel surcharge increases that were implemented consistent with the increasing price of
fuel in the first half of 2008 compared with the same period in 2007
and the start-up of Express Network ACMI at the end of March 2008. RATM in our Scheduled
Service segment was $0.291 in the first half of 2008, compared with $0.242 in the first half of
2007, representing an increase of 20.2%.
AMC Charter revenue decreased primarily due to a significantly lower volume of AMC Charter
flights offset almost entirely by an increase in AMC mileage rates. AMC Charter Block Hours were
9,822 for the first half of 2008, compared with 12,310 for the first half of 2007, a decrease of
2,488 Block Hours, or 20.2%. Revenue per Block Hour was $20,946 for the first half of 2008,
compared with $17,219 for the first half of 2007, an increase of $3,727 per Block Hour, or 21.6%.
The decrease in AMC Charter activity on a year-over-year basis reflects the spike in AMC demand we
experienced in the first quarter of 2007. The AMC demand for Boeing 747 widebody cargo flying fell during the period, which drove the reduction in Atlas AMC Block Hours flown during the second half of 2008 compared with the second half of 2007.
The AMC raised the wide body cargo per ton mile rate
in October 2007 by 2.3% in the normal course of its annual rate making process. The AMC then
raised its pegged fuel price on February 1, 2008 to $2.70 per gallon and again on June 1, 2008 to
$3.20 per gallon. The changes from the rate making process as well as the interim increases in the
pegged fuel price had the effect of increasing the AMC revenue per Block Hour from $17,219 for
the first half of 2007 to $20,946 for the first half of 2008.
Commercial Charter revenue increased as a result of an increase in Revenue per Block Hour,
which offset a small reduction in Block Hours flown in the segment on a year-over-year basis. The
increase in revenue per Block Hour was the result of pricing increases we made to compensate for
the higher cost of fuel. Commercial Charter Block Hours were 2,989 for the first half of 2008,
compared with 3,037 for the first half of 2007, a decrease of 48, or 1.6%. Revenue per Block Hour
was $17,688 for the first half of 2008, compared with $14,593 for the first half of 2007, an
increase of $3,095 per Block Hour, or 21.2%. The decrease in Block Hours is partially the result
of the retirement of one Boeing 747-200 aircraft during the second quarter of 2008 and the
retirement of a damaged Boeing 747-200 aircraft in February 2008 (see Note 2 to our Financial
Statements for further discussion).
Dry Leasing revenue remained flat on a year over year basis due to the reduction of Boeing
747-200 aircraft on Dry Lease in the second quarter of 2008. The Company had three Boeing
747-400 aircraft and one Boeing 747-200 aircraft on Dry Lease to third parties at June 30, 2008
and three Boeing 747-400 aircraft and two Boeing 747-200 aircraft on Dry Lease to third parties
at June 30, 2007. We experienced customer defaults on three Dry Leased Boeing 747-200 aircraft
in the second quarter of 2008 as the two customers leasing these aircraft filed for protection
under local insolvency laws. We have repossessed two of the three aircraft from one customer
and have been in negotiations regarding the lease of the third aircraft with the other customer.
All rents and maintenance reserves payable to us under these Dry Leases were fully reserved
against in the second quarter of 2008.
Total Operating revenue increased in the second half of 2008 compared with the second half
of 2007 primarily as a result of the fuel-driven price increases in Scheduled Service and
Commercial Charter service, and new Express Network ACMI flying, offset by the volume-driven reductions in revenue from ACMI and AMC
flying.
Operating Expenses
The following table compares our operating expenses for the six months ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase / |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Change |
|
Operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft fuel |
|
$ |
351,522 |
|
|
$ |
234,434 |
|
|
$ |
117,088 |
|
|
|
49.9 |
% |
Salaries, wages and benefits |
|
|
111,748 |
|
|
|
123,188 |
|
|
|
(11,440 |
) |
|
|
(9.3 |
%) |
Maintenance, materials and repairs |
|
|
93,843 |
|
|
|
83,219 |
|
|
|
10,624 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
% |
Aircraft rent |
|
|
80,327 |
|
|
|
77,123 |
|
|
|
3,204 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
Ground handling and airport fees |
|
|
37,622 |
|
|
|
35,706 |
|
|
|
1,916 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
% |
Landing fees and other rent |
|
|
38,930 |
|
|
|
36,018 |
|
|
|
2,912 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
21,183 |
|
|
|
19,637 |
|
|
|
1,546 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
% |
Gain on disposal of aircraft |
|
|
(2,726 |
) |
|
|
(1,005 |
) |
|
|
1,721 |
|
|
|
171.2 |
% |
Travel |
|
|
26,609 |
|
|
|
24,604 |
|
|
|
2,005 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
% |
Minority interest |
|
|
(3,675 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
45,466 |
|
|
|
46,312 |
|
|
|
(846 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expense |
|
$ |
800,849 |
|
|
$ |
679,236 |
|
|
$ |
121,613 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Aircraft fuel expense increased as a result of increased market prices for fuel. The average
fuel price per gallon for the Scheduled Service and Commercial Charter businesses was approximately
$3.26 for the first half of 2008, compared with approximately $2.03 for the first half of 2007, an
increase of $1.23, or 60.6%. Fuel consumption for the Scheduled Service and Commercial Charter
businesses increased 9.6 million gallons or 13.4% to 81.3 million gallons for the first half of
2008 from 71.7 million gallons during the first half of 2007. The average pegged price per gallon
for the AMC business was approximately $2.72 for the first half of 2008, compared with
approximately $2.25 for the first half of 2007, an increase of $0.47, or 20.9%. AMC Fuel
consumption decreased by 7.7 million gallons, or 19.5%, to 31.9 million gallons for the first half
of 2008 from 39.6 million gallons during the first half of 2007. The decrease in our AMC fuel
consumption corresponds to the decrease of 2,488 Block Hours in that segment. We do not incur fuel
expense in our ACMI service as the cost of fuel is borne by the customer.
Salaries, wages and benefits decreased due to the reduction in Block Hours as well as lower
profit sharing and incentive compensation accruals related to decreased profitability in the first
half of 2008 compared to the first half of 2007. In the second quarter, we also released
employment tax reserves related to the successful resolution of an examination with the IRS
resulting in a $2.7 million non-recurring benefit for the period.
Maintenance materials and repair increased as a result of increases in line and heavy
maintenance. Heavy maintenance activity reflects two additional Boeing 747-400 D Checks offset by
three fewer Boeing 747-200C Checks. There were five C Checks on Boeing 747-200 aircraft in the
first half of 2008, as compared with eight C Checks during the first half of 2007. For our Boeing
747-400 freighters, there were two D Checks in the first half of 2008 compared with none in the
prior period. There were 26 engine overhauls in both the first half of 2008 and the first half of
2007. The average cost per overhaul on engines increased during the first half of 2008 compared
with 2007. Line maintenance costs per Block Hour showed an increase of 17.3%, or approximately $3.8
million for the first half of 2008 compared with the first half of 2007, attributable to greater
rotable repairs, increases in line maintenance, and an unfavorable shift in spare parts loaning and
borrowing.
Aircraft rent increased primarily due to short-term engine leases and supplemental rent
expense for return conditions on two leased aircraft. In the first half of 2008, short-term leases resulted in $1.5 million of additional rent expense and we
recognized $0.9 million in supplemental expense to reflect maintenance return condition obligations
related to two of our leased Boeing 747-200 aircraft.
Ground handling and airport fees increased primarily as a result of an increase in Scheduled
Service flying. Scheduled Service has the highest departure driven ground handling expense of any
of our service types.
Landing fees and other rent increased primarily as a result of the increase in overfly fees
related to non-ACMI Block Hours. The higher overfly fees are the result of flying a more fuel
efficient route, allowing us to recover the additional overfly fees in fuel savings. We generally
do not incur landing fees in our ACMI service as the cost is borne by the customer.
Depreciation and amortization increased primarily as a result of a reduction in the average
fleet life of the Boeing 747-200 aircraft during the second half of 2007 and increases in scrapping
of certain engine parts and rotables during overhaul.
Gain on disposal of aircraft in the second half of 2008 was the result of the disposal of
aircraft tail number N527FT, which was damaged and subsequently
scrapped (except for engines and other valuable rotable parts) after we reached a settlement with our insurer (see Note 2 our Financial
Statements for further discussion). The gain represents the amount the insurance proceeds exceed
the net book value of the aircraft. The gain in 2007 was the result of the sale of aircraft tail
number N536MC.
Travel increased as a result of greater crew travel requirements as well as an increase in the
cost of airline ticket prices, weakness in the U.S. dollar and increases in travel requirements to
meet our customers flight schedules.
Minority Interest is related to DHLs 49% ownership interest in Polar. The amount of Polar
loss attributable to DHL was $3.7 million for the first half of 2008, which is reflected as a
decrease in our consolidated operating expenses.
Other operating expenses decreased slightly compared to the same quarter in the prior year.
Bad debt expense decreased by approximately $1.0 million and we recorded a $1.8 million benefit
from reduced interest from a settlement with the IRS on an employment tax examination, partially
offset by an increase in AMC commission expense of
24
approximately $2.0 million related to higher AMC
mileage rates.
Total operating expense increased in the first half of 2008 compared with the first half of
2007 primarily due to the increased price of aircraft fuel.
Non-operating Expenses
The following table compares our non-operating expenses for the six months ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase / |
|
Percent |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
(Decrease) |
|
Change |
Non-operating Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
(8,476 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,259 |
) |
|
$ |
1,217 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
% |
Interest expense |
|
|
23,092 |
|
|
|
22,522 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
% |
Capitalized interest |
|
|
(4,049 |
) |
|
|
(1,963 |
) |
|
|
2,086 |
|
|
|
106.3 |
% |
Other (income) expense, net |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
51.1 |
% |
Interest income increased in the first half as higher cash balances available for investing
were offset by a reduction in the effective yield on cash and cash equivalents.
Interest expense increased by 2.5% on a year over year basis due to increased debt related
to the PDP financing facility on five of our twelve firm Boeing 747-8F orders. Long-term debt
and capital leases including the current portion averaged approximately $443.7 million in the
first half of 2008 compared with approximately $411.8 million in the first half of 2007.
Capitalized interest increased due to interest paid on our PDP financing facility in 2008
and increases in PDP balances paid to Boeing related to our Boeing 747-8F orders.
Other (income) expense, net increased slightly due to realized losses on the exchange of
foreign denominated currencies into U.S. dollars. The U.S. dollar strengthened slightly against
most foreign currencies during the first half of 2008 compared with the beginning of the year.
Income taxes The effective tax rate for the first half of 2008 was an expense of 1,645.1%
compared with a benefit of 39.8% for the first half of 2007. Our rate for the first half of 2008
differed from the statutory rate primarily due to losses incurred by our Polar subsidiary and the
disproportionate relationship of those losses to consolidated pretax income for the period. Polar
did not record income tax benefits related to its losses in the first half of 2008 because Polar
has no prior period income and these losses may only offset future income. Until future income
occurs, no tax benefit will be recorded. Our rates for the first half of 2007 reflect the
recognition of a deferred tax asset of $37.0 million offset by a tax reserve of $9.3 million
related to the issuance of shares in Polar to DHL.
Segments
Management allocates the direct costs of aircraft operation and ownership among the reportable
segments based on the aircraft type and activity levels in each segment. Direct costs include crew
costs, maintenance, fuel, ground operations, sales costs, aircraft rent, interest expense related
to aircraft debt and aircraft depreciation. Certain of our costs are fixed, indirect costs. These
costs are not affected by fleet types or activity levels in our business segments and therefore
these costs are not allocated among segments. Examples of unallocated fixed costs are
administrative costs including operations administration, finance, human resources, information
technology, non-aircraft depreciation, and other non-operating costs.
For purposes of segment disclosure, management views the Direct Contribution from our Express
Network ACMI flying as a split between the ACMI contribution derived from the Flight Services
Agreement and other related services tied to the DHL Express Network ACMI operation, which is shown
in ACMI, and the residual contribution attributable to Scheduled Service
operations. The consolidation of Polar results
reflects Express Network ACMI flying as Scheduled Service revenue in our financial statements and
operating statistics. For segment reporting purposes all revenue
derived from ACMI and related services provided
to Polar for Express Network ACMI operations have been reclassified from Scheduled Service to the
ACMI segment (see table below for reconciliation of revenue per the Financial Statements to revenue
by segment). All costs associated with providing such services have also been reclassified
25
for
purposes of calculating Direct Contribution. Non-ACMI costs and an equal amount of revenue remain
in the Scheduled Service segment.
Ownership costs are apportioned to segments based on aircraft equivalents (derived from Block
Hours flown) except for certain ACMI flying, which involves dedicated aircraft, in which case the
allocation is based on the number of dedicated aircraft. The following table compares our Direct
Contribution for segments (see Note 4 to our Financial Statements for the reconciliation to
operating income (loss) and our reasons for using Direct Contribution) for the six months ended
June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase / |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Change |
|
Direct Contribution: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACMI |
|
$ |
23,758 |
|
|
$ |
32,973 |
|
|
$ |
(9,215 |
) |
|
|
(27.9 |
%) |
Scheduled Service |
|
|
(29,515 |
) |
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
(30,414 |
) |
|
|
(3,383.2 |
%) |
AMC Charter |
|
|
51,935 |
|
|
|
46,302 |
|
|
|
5,633 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
% |
Commercial Charter |
|
|
(3,586 |
) |
|
|
2,261 |
|
|
|
(5,847 |
) |
|
|
(258.6 |
%) |
Dry Leasing |
|
|
7,207 |
|
|
|
9,015 |
|
|
|
(1,808 |
) |
|
|
(20.1 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Direct Contribution |
|
$ |
49,799 |
|
|
$ |
91,450 |
|
|
$ |
(41,651 |
) |
|
|
(45.5 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated Fixed Costs |
|
$ |
52,279 |
|
|
$ |
57,121 |
|
|
$ |
(4,842 |
) |
|
|
(8.5 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACMI Segment
During the six months ended June 30, 2008 there was an average of 10.5 Boeing 747-400 aircraft
and an average of 1.8 Boeing 747-200 aircraft supporting ACMI compared with an average of ten
Boeing 747-400 aircraft and an average of three Boeing 747-200 aircraft supporting ACMI for the
comparable period in 2007. ACMI segment Direct Contribution decreased primarily due to a decrease
in Block Hours flown as well as increases in ownership and maintenance costs. Ownership costs
increased as a result of more CF6-80 engine leases in support of our expanded Boeing 747-400 fleet.
The increase in maintenance costs was primarily due to two additional Boeing 747-400 D-Checks and
one additional CF6-80 engine overhaul in the first half of 2008 compared with the same period last
year
Scheduled Service Segment
Direct Contribution relating to the Scheduled Service segment decreased primarily as a result
of fuel price increases as well as higher ownership and maintenance costs. Ownership costs
increased as a result of more CF6-80 engine leases in support of our expanded Boeing 747-400 fleet.
The increase in maintenance costs was primarily due to two additional Boeing 747-400 D-Checks in
the first half of 2008 compared with the first half of 2007 as well as higher engine maintenance
expense. The increased costs were partially offset by fuel-surcharge-driven yield increases.
AMC Charter Segment
Direct Contribution relating to the AMC Charter segment increased 12.2% on 20.2% fewer Block
Hours. The increase in the Direct Contribution is due to contractual rate increases as well as
the interim increases in the pegged fuel price (see AMC Revenue discussion above), which had the
effect of increasing the AMC revenue per Block Hour from $17,219 for the first half of 2007 to
$20,946 for the first half of 2008. Although the price of fuel increased significantly on a
period-over-period basis, the AMC reimburses the Company for its AMC fuel costs. The increase in
the AMC mileage rate, which includes a standard profit margin allowed by the AMC, was partially
offset by cost increases in commissions and fuel.
Commercial Charter Segment
Direct Contribution relating to the Commercial Charter segment declined as a result of
increases in fuel costs that were not fully offset by fuel-driven price increases. The decrease in
Block Hours was partially due to the unavailability of one Boeing 747-200 equivalent since February
2008
Dry Leasing
Direct Contribution relating to the Dry Leasing segment declined due to an increase in costs
related to return condition accruals and the operating costs of our Dry Leasing subsidiary. In
addition, we experienced customer defaults on three Dry Leased Boeing 747-200 aircraft in the
second quarter of 2008 as the two customers leasing these aircraft filed for protection under local
insolvency laws. We have repossessed two of the three aircraft from one customer and have been in
negotiations regarding the lease of the third aircraft with the other customer. The two
repossessed aircraft have been made
26
available for use by our AMC and Commercial Charter Segments.
All rents and maintenance reserves payable to us under these Dry Leases were fully reserved against
in the second quarter of 2008.
Unallocated Fixed Costs
Unallocated fixed costs for the first half of 2008 were $52.3 million compared to $57.1
million in the same period of the prior year. The decrease of $4.8 million or 8.5% is attributable
primarily to a one time benefit from the release of employment tax reserves and reduced accrued
interest from a settlement with the IRS on an employment tax examination.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At June 30, 2008, we had cash and cash equivalents of $367.5 million, compared with $477.3
million at December 31, 2007, a decrease of $109.8 million, or 23.0%. The decrease in cash is the
result of payments used for investing activities of $268.5 million partially offset by cash
provided by operating and financing activities of $26.5 million and $132.3 million, respectively.
On January 30, 2008, Atlas entered into a $270.3 million PDP Financing Facility with Norddeutsche
Landesbank, in connection with five new Boeing 747-8F wide-body freighters scheduled for delivery
between February and July 2010. In addition on July 3, 2008, Atlas entered into a $58.4 million,
five year term loan and a commitment for an additional $41.1 million five term loan expected to
close in the third quarter of 2008. We consider cash on hand, the PDP Financing Facility, the term
loans (see Notes 3 and 9 to our Financial Statements) and cash generated from operations to be
sufficient to meet our debt and lease obligations and to fund expected capital expenditures.
Capital Expenditures for the remainder of 2008 are projected to be approximately $194.5 million,
which includes Boeing 747-8F aircraft pre-delivery deposits (see Note 5 to our Financial
Statements) and the remaining payments due on the Boeing 747-400 conversion freighter.
We expect to utilize tax loss carryforwards to offset most taxable income generated during
2008. We may pay significant U.S. cash income taxes in 2009. Management is considering certain
income tax planning opportunities that may reduce our effective tax rate and cash tax liability in
2008 and beyond. However, these planning opportunities are not yet fully developed, and the
potential tax rate reduction and cash tax savings, if any, are not yet quantifiable. The Company
expects to pay foreign income taxes in Hong Kong starting in 2008. These taxes could be offset in
the U.S. by a foreign tax credit. The Company expects to pay no significant foreign income taxes in
jurisdictions other than Hong Kong. Two of the Companys foreign branch operations are subject to
income tax in Hong Kong.
Operating Activities. Net cash provided by operating activities for the first half of 2008
was $26.5 million, compared with net cash provided by operating activities of $43.9 million for
the first half of 2007. The decrease in cash from operating activities is the result of the net
loss and an increase in accounts receivable partially offset by an increase in accounts payable
and accrued liabilities.
Investing Activities. Net cash used for investing activities was $268.5 million for the
first half of 2008, consisting primarily of capital expenditures of $274.4 million (including
Boeing 747-8F pre-delivery deposits of $96.9 million and payments made for the acquisition of
two Boeing 747-400 aircraft of $152.3 million) offset by insurance proceeds of $5.9 million. Net
cash used by investing activities was $24.4 million for the first half of 2007 consisting
primarily of capital expenditures of $30.4 million (including Boeing 747-8F aircraft
pre-delivery deposits of $12.4 million) offset by $6.0 million in proceeds from the sale of a
Boeing 747-200 aircraft.
Financing Activities. Net cash provided by financing activities was $132.3 million for the
first half of 2008, which consisted primarily of $107.3 million in borrowings under the PDP
Financing Facility, proceeds from the DHL investment of $38.6 million, $3.2 million in proceeds
from the exercise of stock options and a $1.2 million tax benefit on restricted stock and stock
options offset by $17.5 million of payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations and
a $0.4 million purchase of treasury stock. Net cash provided by financing activities was $61.1
million for the first half of 2007, which reflects proceeds from the DHL investment of $75.0
million and $4.0 million in proceeds from stock option exercises and $1.6 million in tax
benefits on restricted stock and stock options, offset by $18.8 million of payments on long-term
debt and capital lease obligations and a $0.7 million purchase of treasury stock.
Debt Agreements
See Note 6 to the audited consolidated financial statements included in the 2007 10-K for a
description of the Companys debt obligations and amendments thereto.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
27
There were no material changes in our off-balance sheet arrangements during the six months
ended June 30, 2008.
Critical Accounting Policies
There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates from
the information provided in Part II, Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, included in our 2007 10-K.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2 to our Financial Statements for a discussion of new accounting pronouncements.
Forward Looking Statements
Our disclosure and analysis in this report, including but not limited to the information
discussed in the Business Strategy section above, contain forward-looking information about our
financial results, estimates and business prospects that involve substantial risks and
uncertainties. From time to time, we also may provide oral or written forward-looking statements in
other materials we release to the public. Forward-looking statements give our current expectations
or forecasts of future events. You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not
relate strictly to historic or current facts. They use words such as anticipate, estimate,
expect, project, intend, plan, believe, will, target and other words and terms of
similar meaning in connection with a discussion of future operating or financial performance. In
particular, these include statements relating to future actions, future performance, sales efforts,
expenses, interest rates, foreign exchange rates, the outcome of contingencies such as legal
proceedings and financial results.
We cannot guarantee that any forward-looking statement will be realized, although we believe
we have been prudent in our plans and assumptions. Achievement of future results is subject to
risks, uncertainties and inaccurate assumptions. Should known or unknown risks or uncertainties
materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove inaccurate, actual results could vary
materially from past results and those anticipated, estimated or projected. Investors should bear
this in mind as they consider forward-looking statements.
We undertake no obligation to publicly update forward-looking statements, whether as a result
of new information, future events or otherwise. You are advised, however, to consult any further
disclosures we make on related subjects in our Form 10-Q, 8-K and 10-K reports filed with the SEC.
Our 2007 10-K listed various important risk factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from expected and historic results. We note these factors for investors as permitted by
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You should understand that it is not possible
to predict or identify all such factors. Consequently, you should not consider any such list to be
a complete set of all potential risks or uncertainties.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
There have been no material changes in market risks from the information provided in Item 7A
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk included in our 2007 10-K, except as
follows:
Aviation fuel. Our results of operations are affected by changes in the price and
availability of aviation fuel. Market risk is estimated at a hypothetical 10% increase or
decrease in the average cost per gallon of fuel for the second quarter of 2008. Based on actual
fuel consumption during the second quarter of 2008 for the Scheduled Service and Commercial
Charter business segments, such an increase or decrease would result in a change to aviation
fuel expense of approximately $15.8 million for the second quarter of 2008. Fuel prices for AMC
are set each September by the military and are fixed for the year and adjusted to actual costs
incurred. ACMI does not present an aviation fuel market risk, as the cost of fuel is borne by
the customer.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer, or CEO, and Chief Financial Officer, or CFO, of
the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the
Exchange Act) as of June 30, 2008. Based on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be
disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported
28
within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule
13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the three months ended June 30, 2008 that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
29
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
With respect to the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008, the information required in response
to this Item is set forth in Note 5 to our Financial Statements contained in this report, and such
information is incorporated herein by reference. Such description contains all of the information
required with respect hereto.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
We made the following repurchases of shares of our common stock during the fiscal quarter
ended June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
Value) of Shares |
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
that May Yet Be |
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
Average Price Paid |
|
|
Announced Plans or |
|
|
Purchased Under the |
|
Period |
|
(a) |
|
per Share |
|
Programs (b) |
|
Plans or Programs |
April 1, 2008
through April 30,
2008 |
|
|
170 |
|
|
$ |
58.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2008 through
May 31, 2008 |
|
|
1,275 |
|
|
$ |
61.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 1, 2008
through June 30,
2008 |
|
|
3,747 |
|
|
$ |
52.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
5,192 |
|
|
$ |
54.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
This column reflects the repurchase of 5,192 shares of common stock, previously issued
by Holdings, to satisfy individual income tax liabilities of our employees at statutory minimum
rates resulting from the vesting of restricted shares during such period. |
|
(b) |
|
There are no approved share repurchase programs. |
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
At our annual meeting of stockholders held in New York, New York on May 21, 2008, our
stockholders re-elected our Board of Directors, and the shares present at the meeting were voted
for or withheld from each nominee were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Number of Shares Voted For |
|
Number of Shares Withheld |
Robert F. Agnew |
|
|
17,369,608 |
|
|
|
94,122 |
|
Timothy J. Bernlohr |
|
|
16,846,263 |
|
|
|
617,467 |
|
Keith E. Butler |
|
|
17,369,656 |
|
|
|
94,074 |
|
Eugene I. Davis |
|
|
16,574,488 |
|
|
|
889,242 |
|
William J. Flynn |
|
|
17,419,452 |
|
|
|
44,278 |
|
James S. Gilmore III |
|
|
10,687,376 |
|
|
|
6,776,354 |
|
Carol B Hallett |
|
|
17,406,467 |
|
|
|
57,263 |
|
Frederick McCorkle |
|
|
16,883,389 |
|
|
|
580,341 |
|
Jeffrey H. Erickson, our former President and Chief Executive Officer, did not to stand for
election and retired from the Board at the time of the meeting.
30
The Audit Committees designation of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Companys independent
registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008 was ratified by the
stockholders. The shares present at the meeting were voted on the proposal as follows: 17,158,062
shares voted for approval, 305,228 shares voted against the proposal, with 440 shares abstaining.
At the meeting, our stockholders also approved an amendment to the Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings,
Inc. 2007 Incentive Plan (the 2007 Plan) to increase the amount of shares reserved under the
2007 Plan by 1,100,000. The shares present at the meeting were voted on the proposal as follows:
16,122,814 shares voted for approval, 497,113 shares voted against the proposal, with 62,702
shares abstaining. There were 781,101 broker non-votes in respect of this proposal.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
a. Exhibits
See accompanying Exhibit Index included after the signature page of this report for a list
of exhibits filed or furnished with this report.
31
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc.
|
|
Dated: August 7, 2008 |
/s/ William J. Flynn
|
|
|
William J. Flynn |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: August 7, 2008 |
/s/ Jason Grant
|
|
|
Jason Grant |
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer |
|
32
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings Incentive Plan (As Amended), filed as Exhibit 10 to
the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 21, 2008, and incorporated herein
by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
Employment
Agreement by and between Ronald A. Lane and Atlas Air, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer, furnished herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer, furnished herewith. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications, furnished herewith. |
33