defm14a
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant x
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o
Check the appropriate box:
o Preliminary Proxy Statement
o Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
x Definitive Proxy Statement
o Definitive Additional Materials
o Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12
Woodbridge Holdings Corporation
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
x |
|
No fee required. |
|
o |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
(1) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
(2) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
(3) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was
determined): |
|
(4) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
(5) |
|
Total fee paid: |
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
o |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange
Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting
fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
(1) |
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
(2) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
(3) |
|
Filing Party: |
(4) |
|
Date Filed: |
JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS
Dear Shareholders:
On July 2, 2009, BFC Financial Corporation and Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation entered into a definitive merger agreement.
Subject to the terms and conditions of the merger agreement,
Woodbridge will be merged with and into a wholly owned
subsidiary of BFC, and holders of Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock (other than BFC and holders who exercise and
perfect their appraisal rights) will receive, in consideration
for each share of such stock they own, 3.47 shares of
BFCs Class A Common Stock. BFC will not issue
fractional shares of its Class A Common Stock in the
merger, but instead, the aggregate number of shares of
BFCs Class A Common Stock to which holders of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock will be entitled to
receive will be rounded up to the next largest whole number.
BFCs Class A Common Stock is traded on the Pink
Sheets Electronic Quotation Service under the symbol
BFCF.PK, and Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock is traded on the Pink Sheets Electronic Quotation Service
under the symbol WDGH.PK. On August 14, 2009,
the last trading day before the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, the closing price of BFCs
Class A Common Stock was $0.49 per share, and the closing
price of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock was $1.45
per share.
The merger is conditioned upon, among other things, the approval
of each of BFCs and Woodbridges shareholders. BFC
will hold a special meeting of its shareholders on September 21,
2009 at 11:30 a.m., local time, at the Corporate Center, 2100
West Cypress Creek Road, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309. At the
meeting, BFCs shareholders will be asked to consider and
vote upon a proposal to approve the merger and the related
transactions.
In addition, Woodbridge will hold its annual meeting of
shareholders on September 21, 2009 at 12:00 p.m., local time, at
the Corporate Center, 2100 West Cypress Creek Road, Fort
Lauderdale, Florida 33309. At the meeting, Woodbridges
shareholders will be asked (i) to approve the merger
agreement, (ii) to elect three directors to
Woodbridges board of directors to serve until the earlier
of Woodbridges 2012 annual meeting of shareholders and the
consummation of the merger and (iii) to transact such other
business as may properly be brought before the meeting or any
adjournment or postponement thereof.
YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT. Whether or not
you plan to attend the meeting of the company of which you are a
shareholder, please take the time to vote by completing,
signing, dating and returning the accompanying proxy card in the
enclosed self-addressed stamped envelope or otherwise
transmitting your voting instructions as described on the
enclosed proxy card as soon as possible. If you hold your shares
in street name, you should instruct your broker how
to vote in accordance with the voting instruction form to be
provided to you by your broker.
This joint proxy statement/prospectus provides detailed
information concerning the merger and the merger agreement as
well as the director election proposal to be considered at
Woodbridges annual meeting. Additional information
regarding BFC and Woodbridge has been filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission and is publicly available. BFC and
Woodbridge encourage you to read carefully this entire joint
proxy statement/prospectus, including all annexes.
The board of directors of BFC determined that the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby are
advisable, fair to and in the best interests of BFC and its
shareholders and, accordingly, has approved the merger agreement
and the transactions contemplated thereby and recommends that
BFCs shareholders vote FOR the approval
of the merger and the related transactions.
Following receipt of a recommendation in favor of the merger by
a special committee comprised of Woodbridges independent
directors, the board of directors of Woodbridge determined that
the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby
are advisable, fair to and in the best interests of
Woodbridges shareholders and, accordingly, has approved
the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby
and recommends that Woodbridges shareholders vote
FOR the approval of the merger agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alan B. Levan
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
BFC Financial Corporation
|
|
Seth M. Wise
President
Woodbridge Holdings Corporation
|
For a discussion of significant matters that should be
considered before voting at the meetings, please read the
section entitled Risk Factors beginning on
page 19.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of the shares
of BFCs Class A Common Stock which may be issued in
connection with the merger or passed upon the adequacy or
accuracy of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is dated
August 17, 2009 and is first being mailed to shareholders
of BFC and Woodbridge on or about August 21, 2009.
BFC
Financial Corporation
2100 West Cypress Creek
Road
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309
NOTICE
OF SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To Be Held on
September 21, 2009
To the shareholders of BFC Financial Corporation:
Notice is hereby given that a special meeting of shareholders of
BFC Financial Corporation will be held at the Corporate Center,
2100 West Cypress Creek Road, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309 on
September 21, 2009 commencing at 11:30 a.m., local time,
solely to consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the
merger of Woodbridge Holdings Corporation with and into a
wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC pursuant to the terms and
conditions of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of
July 2, 2009, by and among BFC, Woodbridge and WDG Merger
Sub, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC, as well as the
transactions related to the merger, including the amendment of
BFCs Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to
increase the number of authorized shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock from 100,000,000 shares to
150,000,000 shares.
Only holders of record of BFCs Class A Common Stock
and Class B Common Stock as of the close of business on
August 18, 2009 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at,
the meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.
The joint proxy statement/prospectus accompanying this notice
explains the merger and the related transactions. Please
carefully review the joint proxy statement/prospectus, including
the merger agreement and the Form of Articles of Amendment to
BFCs Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, which
are attached thereto as Annexes A and D, respectively.
The merger and the related transactions cannot be completed
unless they are approved at the meeting. The board of directors
of BFC has determined that the merger and the related
transactions are advisable, fair to and in the best interests of
BFC and its shareholders and, accordingly, has approved and
recommends that BFCs shareholders vote FOR the
merger and the related transactions.
BFCs shareholders are urged to please complete, sign
and date the enclosed proxy card and return it promptly in the
enclosed postage-paid return envelope or otherwise transmit your
voting instructions as described on the enclosed proxy card as
soon as possible, whether or not you plan to attend the meeting.
You may revoke the proxy at any time prior to its exercise
in the manner described in the joint proxy statement/
prospectus. Any shareholder of record present at the meeting,
including any adjournment or postponement thereof, may revoke
his, her or its proxy and vote personally at the meeting.
By order of the board of directors,
Alan B. Levan
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
August 17, 2009
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
2100 West Cypress Creek Road
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS
To Be Held on
September 21, 2009
To the shareholders of Woodbridge Holdings Corporation:
Notice is hereby given that the annual meeting of shareholders
of Woodbridge Holdings Corporation will be held at the Corporate
Center, 2100 West Cypress Creek Road, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
33309 on September 21, 2009 commencing at 12:00 p.m., local
time, for the following purposes:
1. To consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 2, 2009, by
and among Woodbridge, BFC Financial Corporation and WDG Merger
Sub, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC, pursuant to which
Woodbridge will merge with and into a wholly owned subsidiary of
BFC and each outstanding share of Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock (other than shares owned by BFC and holders who
assert and exercise their appraisal rights) will be converted
into the right to receive 3.47 shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock.
2. To consider and vote upon a proposal to elect three
directors to Woodbridges board of directors to serve until
the earlier of Woodbridges 2012 annual meeting of
shareholders and the consummation of the merger described above.
3. To transact such other business as may properly be
brought before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement
thereof.
Only holders of record of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock and Class B Common Stock as of the close of business
on August 18, 2009 are entitled to notice of, and to vote
at, the meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.
The joint proxy statement/prospectus accompanying this notice
explains the merger agreement and the merger as well as the
director election proposal to be considered at the meeting.
Please carefully review the joint proxy statement/prospectus,
including the merger agreement attached thereto as Annex A.
The merger and the other transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement cannot be completed unless the merger agreement
is approved at the meeting. The board of directors of Woodbridge
has determined that the merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement are advisable, fair to and
in the best interests of Woodbridges shareholders and,
accordingly, has approved the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby and recommends that
Woodbridges shareholders vote FOR the approval
of the merger agreement.
Woodbridges shareholders are urged to please complete,
sign and date the enclosed proxy card and return it promptly in
the enclosed postage-paid return envelope or otherwise transmit
your voting instructions as described on the enclosed proxy card
as soon as possible, whether or not you plan to attend the
meeting. You may revoke the proxy at any time prior to its
exercise in the manner described in the joint proxy statement/
prospectus. Any shareholder of record present at the meeting,
including any adjournment or postponement thereof, may revoke
his, her or its proxy and vote personally at the meeting.
By order of the board of directors,
Seth M. Wise
President
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
August 17, 2009
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
v
|
|
|
|
|
ix
|
|
|
|
|
xii
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
iii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
|
|
F-165
|
|
|
|
|
Annex A
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger
|
Annex B
|
|
Opinion of JMP Securities LLC
|
Annex C
|
|
Opinion of Allen C. Ewing & Co.
|
Annex D
|
|
Form of Articles of Amendment to the Amended and Restated
Articles of Incorporation of BFC Financial Corporation
|
Annex E
|
|
Form of By-laws of BFC Financial Corporation, as Proposed to be
Amended
|
Annex F
|
|
Appraisal Rights Statutes under the Florida Business Corporation
Act
|
This document, which forms part of a Registration Statement on
Form S-4
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by BFC,
constitutes a prospectus of BFC under Section 5 of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities
Act), with respect to the shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock to be issued to the holders of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock in connection with
the merger. This document also constitutes (i) a joint
proxy statement of BFC and Woodbridge under Section 14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act), and the rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder, (ii) a notice of meeting with
respect to the special meeting of BFCs shareholders, at
which BFCs shareholders will consider and vote upon the
merger and the related transactions and (iii) a notice of
meeting with respect to Woodbridges 2009 annual meeting of
shareholders, at which Woodbridges shareholders will
consider and vote upon, among other proposals, the merger
agreement.
The information contained in the sections of this document
entitled Selected Historical Consolidated Financial
Information of Woodbridge, Information About
Woodbridge Business, Market
for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters,
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk and Management as well
as the information relating to the year ended December 31,
2008 contained in the sections entitled Woodbridges
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations and Woodbridges
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data constitute
Woodbridges annual report to shareholders for purposes of
Rule 14a-3(b)
of the Exchange Act. Woodbridge will provide without charge
to each of its shareholders to whom this document is delivered,
upon the written request of such shareholder, a copy of its
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 (excluding the
exhibits thereto). Any and all such requests should be directed
to Woodbridge Holdings Corporation, 2100 W. Cypress
Creek Road, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309, Attn: Sharon
Lyn, Investor Relations.
iv
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What is the proposed merger? |
|
A: |
|
On July 2, 2009, BFC Financial Corporation
(BFC) and Woodbridge Holdings Corporation
(Woodbridge) entered into the Agreement and Plan of
Merger (the merger agreement) that is described in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus. See The Merger
Agreement beginning on page 90. A copy of the merger
agreement is attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus
as Annex A. |
|
|
|
Subject to the terms and conditions of the merger agreement,
Woodbridge will be merged with and into WDG Merger Sub, LLC, a
wholly owned subsidiary of BFC (Merger Sub), with
Merger Sub surviving and remaining a wholly owned subsidiary of
BFC (the merger). |
|
Q: |
|
Why am I being asked to vote on the merger? |
|
A: |
|
In accordance with BFCs Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation, the merger cannot be completed unless it is
approved by BFCs shareholders. Further, under the Florida
Business Corporation Act (the FBCA), the related
amendment to BFCs Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of
BFCs Class A Common Stock from
100,000,000 shares to 150,000,000 shares requires the
approval of BFCs shareholders. Accordingly, at the special
meeting of BFCs shareholders, BFCs shareholders will
be asked to approve the merger and the related transactions,
including the amendment to BFCs Amended and Restated
Articles of Incorporation increasing the number of authorized
shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock from
100,000,000 shares to 150,000,000 shares. |
|
|
|
In addition, under the FBCA, the merger cannot be completed
unless Woodbridges shareholders approve the merger
agreement. As a result, at Woodbridges annual meeting of
shareholders, Woodbridges shareholders will be asked,
among other proposals, to approve the merger agreement. |
|
|
|
See Questions and Answers About the BFC Special
Meeting beginning on page ix and Questions and
Answers About the Woodbridge Annual Meeting beginning on
page xii for a discussion about the voting rights and
voting procedures with respect to, and the shareholder vote
required to approve, the merger and the related transactions and
the merger agreement, as applicable. |
|
Q: |
|
What will Woodbridges shareholders receive in the
merger? |
|
A: |
|
Other than BFC, whose shares of Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock and Class B Common Stock will be canceled in
connection with the merger, and holders of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock who exercise and perfect their
appraisal rights, each holder of Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock will be entitled to receive 3.47 shares of
BFCs Class A Common Stock for each share of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock owned by such holder
at the effective time of the merger. BFC will not issue
fractional shares of its Class A Common Stock in the
merger, but instead, the aggregate number of shares of
BFCs Class A Common Stock to which holders of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock will be entitled to
receive will be rounded up to the next largest whole number. On
July 2, 2009, the last trading day before the public
announcement of the merger agreement, and on August 14,
2009, the last trading day before the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, the closing price of BFCs
Class A Common Stock, as quoted on the Pink Sheets
Electronic Quotation Service (the Pink Sheets), was
$0.40 per share and $0.49 per share, respectively. On
July 2, 2009 and on August 14, 2009, the closing price
of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock, as quoted on the
Pink Sheets, was $1.10 per share and $1.45 per share,
respectively. Shareholders of both companies are encouraged to
obtain current market quotations prior to voting their shares. |
|
Q: |
|
What will happen to restricted stock awards of shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock and options to
purchase shares of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock? |
|
A: |
|
At the effective time of the merger, BFC will assume
Woodbridges 2003 Stock Incentive Plan, and all restricted
stock awards of shares of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock outstanding at the effective time of the merger will be
converted automatically into restricted stock awards of shares
of BFCs Class A Common Stock on the same terms and
conditions and with the same restrictions, but with appropriate |
v
|
|
|
|
|
adjustments made to the number of shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock covered by the new restricted stock
awards based on the exchange ratio of 3.47 shares of
BFCs Class A Common Stock for each share of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock. |
|
|
|
|
|
All options to purchase shares of Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock outstanding at the effective time of the merger
will be canceled in connection with the merger, and the holders
thereof will not receive any consideration as a result of such
cancellation. In agreeing to this treatment of Woodbridges
options, Woodbridges special committee and board of
directors considered the fact that, as of the date of the merger
agreement, all such options were, and, for the foreseeable
future, all such options are expected to be,
out-of-the-money with exercise prices greatly
exceeding the current market price of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock. However, it is anticipated that some
or all of the directors and executive officers of Woodbridge
will be granted BFC stock options or other equity-based
compensation awards of BFC following the merger. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What will BFCs shareholders receive in connection
with the merger? |
|
A: |
|
BFCs shareholders will not receive any consideration in
connection with the merger. Each share of BFCs
Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock
outstanding immediately prior to the merger will remain
outstanding as a share of BFCs Class A Common Stock
and Class B Common Stock, respectively, immediately
following the merger. |
|
Q: |
|
Will there be restrictions on the transfer of the shares
of BFCs Class A Common Stock to be issued in the
merger? |
|
A: |
|
The shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock to be issued
in the merger will be freely tradeable unless you are an
affiliate of Woodbridge or BFC within the meaning of the federal
securities laws. This will generally be the case only if you are
a director, executive officer or holder of 10% or more of
Woodbridges or BFCs outstanding common stock. |
|
Q: |
|
What are the material federal income tax consequences of
the merger to Woodbridges shareholders? |
|
A: |
|
The merger has been structured to qualify as a tax-free
reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (the Code). Accordingly, holders of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock should not recognize
gain or loss for United States federal income tax purposes upon
the exchange of shares of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock for shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock. |
|
|
|
As described in further detail below, holders of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock have the right to
assert and exercise appraisal rights with respect to the merger
and obtain payment in cash for the value of their shares. The
receipt of cash in exchange for shares of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock will be a taxable transaction. |
|
|
|
Tax matters are very complicated, and the tax consequences of
the merger to a particular shareholder will depend in part on
such shareholders circumstances. Accordingly, you are
urged to consult your own tax advisor for a full understanding
of the tax consequences of the merger to you, including the
applicability and effect of federal, state, local and foreign
income and other tax laws. |
|
Q: |
|
Does the board of directors of Woodbridge recommend the
approval of the merger agreement? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. The board of directors of Woodbridge designated a special
committee comprised of independent directors (the
Woodbridge special committee) to, among other
things, negotiate, review and evaluate the terms and conditions,
and determine the advisability of the merger. After such
negotiation, review and evaluation, the Woodbridge special
committee determined that the merger is advisable, fair to and
in the best interests of Woodbridges shareholders. On the
basis of such determination, the Woodbridge special committee
recommended that the full board of directors of Woodbridge
approve the merger agreement and the merger on the terms and
conditions set forth in the merger agreement and recommend to
the shareholders of Woodbridge that they approve the merger
agreement. In arriving at its determination, the Woodbridge
special committee consulted with certain members of
Woodbridges senior management and its |
vi
|
|
|
|
|
legal and financial advisors and considered the factors
described under The Merger Recommendation of
the Woodbridge Board and its Reasons for the Merger. |
|
|
|
After careful consideration of the recommendation of the
Woodbridge special committee and careful evaluation and
consideration of the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby, the board of directors of Woodbridge
determined that the merger agreement and the merger are
advisable, fair to and in the best interests of
Woodbridges shareholders. Accordingly, the board of
directors of Woodbridge approved the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby, including the merger, and
recommends that Woodbridges shareholders vote
FOR the approval of the merger agreement. In
arriving at its determination, the Woodbridge board of directors
also considered the factors described under The
Merger Recommendation of the Woodbridge Board and
its Reasons for the Merger. |
|
Q: |
|
Does the board of directors of BFC recommend the approval
of the merger? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. After careful evaluation and consideration of the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, the board
of directors of BFC determined that the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby are advisable, fair to and in
the best interests of BFC and its shareholders. Accordingly, the
board of directors of BFC approved the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby and recommends that BFCs
shareholders vote FOR the merger. In arriving at
this determination, the board of directors of BFC also consulted
with certain members of BFCs senior management and
BFCs legal and financial advisors and considered the
factors described under The Merger
Recommendation of the BFC Board and its Reasons for the
Merger. |
|
Q: |
|
How do Woodbridge and BFC expect to conduct their
respective businesses until the merger is completed and after
the merger is completed? |
|
A: |
|
Both Woodbridge and BFC expect to, and have agreed in the merger
agreement to, conduct their respective businesses prior to the
effective time of the merger in the usual and ordinary course,
consistent with their existing business and investment
strategies and operational plans. With respect to Woodbridge,
this may include, among other things, the continued pursuit of
investments and acquisitions within or outside of the real
estate industry and providing support to its existing
investments, including additional investments in affiliates such
as Bluegreen Corporation (Bluegreen), among others.
Further, BFC expects to continue providing support for its
controlled subsidiaries with a view to the improved performance
of the organization as a whole, and this business strategy may
include additional investments in its controlled subsidiaries
such as BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. (BankAtlantic
Bancorp). |
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, BFC expects that both it and Woodbridge (as a
wholly owned subsidiary of BFC) will continue to conduct their
respective businesses following the merger in the usual and
ordinary course. BFC intends to allocate resources within the
consolidated group among BFCs investments and subsidiaries
in a manner which its board of directors believes to be
beneficial to BFCs shareholders. It is currently
anticipated that BFC will make additional investments in
BankAtlantic Bancorp, whether in BankAtlantic Bancorps
previously announced $100 million rights offering to its
shareholders or otherwise, and may also make additional
investments in Bluegreen, Core Communities, LLC (Core
Communities or Core) or Benihana, Inc.
(Benihana). |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Are there risks associated with the merger and the related
transactions? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Yes. In evaluating the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby, you should carefully consider the risks
discussed in the section of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus entitled Risk Factors beginning
on page 19 and the other information about BFC and
Woodbridge contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
When do the parties expect the merger to be
completed? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
BFC and Woodbridge are working to complete the merger as quickly
as practicable. If each of BFCs and Woodbridges
shareholders approve the merger and the merger agreement,
respectively, and the other conditions to consummation of the
merger are met, then BFC and Woodbridge expect that the merger
will be completed prior to the end of the third quarter of 2009.
However, it is possible that factors outside of |
vii
|
|
|
|
|
BFCs or Woodbridges control could require them to
complete the merger at a later time or not complete it at all. |
|
|
|
For a description of certain matters that could delay or prevent
the completion of the merger, please read the section entitled
Risk Factors beginning on page 19. |
|
Q: |
|
If I am a Woodbridge shareholder, should I send in my
stock certificates now? |
|
A: |
|
No. If you are a holder of Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock and the merger is approved, you will receive
written instructions from the exchange agent retained for
purposes of the merger explaining how to exchange your
certificates representing shares of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock for certificates representing shares
of BFCs Class A Common Stock to which you are
entitled as a result of the merger. BFCs shareholders will
not exchange their stock certificates. |
|
Q: |
|
Can I assert appraisal rights with respect to the
merger? |
|
A: |
|
Under the FBCA, holders of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock have the right to assert and exercise appraisal rights
with respect to the merger and obtain payment in cash for the
value of their shares rather than receive shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock. The receipt of cash in exchange for
shares of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock will be a
taxable transaction. Pursuant to the FBCA, the fair value of the
shares of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock held by a
Woodbridge shareholder asserting appraisal rights means the
value of such shares calculated as of the time immediately
preceding the consummation of the merger, excluding any
appreciation or depreciation in anticipation of the merger, and
could be more than, less than or equal to the value of the
shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock that the
shareholder would otherwise have received in connection with the
merger. To assert and exercise appraisal rights, holders of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock must strictly follow
the procedures set forth in the FBCA. These procedures are
summarized under the section entitled The
Merger Appraisal Rights beginning on
page 85. In addition, the text of the applicable provisions
of the FBCA is included as Annex F to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. Any holder of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock wishing to assert and exercise
appraisal rights is urged to consult with his, her or its legal
counsel before attempting to assert and exercise those rights.
BFCs obligation to consummate the merger is conditioned
upon holders of not more than 10% of the outstanding shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock exercising, or
remaining entitled to exercise, appraisal rights for their
shares. |
|
|
|
Under the FBCA, BFCs shareholders will not be entitled to
appraisal rights in connection with the merger. |
|
Q: |
|
Where can I find more information about BFC and
Woodbridge? |
|
A: |
|
You can obtain more information about BFC and Woodbridge from
the various sources described under Where You Can Find
More Information beginning on page 301. |
viii
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE BFC SPECIAL MEETING
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Where and when is the BFC special meeting? |
|
A: |
|
The special meeting of BFCs shareholders will be held at
the Corporate Center, 2100 West Cypress Creek Road, Fort
Lauderdale, Florida 33309 on September 21, 2009 commencing
at 11:30 a.m., local time. |
|
Q: |
|
Who can vote at the meeting? |
|
A: |
|
Record holders of BFCs Class A Common Stock and
record holders of BFCs Class B Common Stock as of the
close of business on August 18, 2009 (the BFC record
date) may vote at the meeting. As of the close of business
on the BFC record date, 38,275,112 shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock and 6,854,381 shares of BFCs
Class B Common Stock were outstanding. |
|
Q: |
|
What will BFCs shareholders be asked to vote on at
the meeting? |
|
A: |
|
As described above and in the notice of special meeting of
BFCs shareholders, BFCs shareholders will be asked
to consider and vote upon the proposal to approve the merger and
the related transactions, including an amendment to BFCs
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation increasing the
number of authorized shares of BFCs Class A Common
Stock from 100,000,000 shares to 150,000,000 shares.
In accordance with BFCs Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation and the FBCA, the merger and the related
transactions cannot be completed unless they are approved by
BFCs shareholders. |
|
Q: |
|
What are the voting rights of BFCs shareholders with
respect to the merger and the related transactions? |
|
A: |
|
BFCs shareholders will vote together as a single class on
the proposal relating to the merger and the related
transactions. Each share of BFCs Class A Common Stock
entitles the holder thereof to one vote per share on such
proposal, with all holders of BFCs Class A Common
Stock having in the aggregate 22.0% of the general voting power
of BFC. The number of votes represented by each share of
BFCs Class B Common Stock, which represents in the
aggregate 78% of the general voting power of BFC, is calculated
in accordance with BFCs Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation. At the meeting, each outstanding share of
BFCs Class B Common Stock will be entitled to 19.7979
votes on the proposal relating to the merger and the related
transactions. |
|
Q: |
|
What are my choices when voting on the merger and the
related transactions? |
|
A: |
|
BFCs shareholders may vote for or against, or abstain from
voting on, the merger and the related transactions. |
|
Q: |
|
What vote of BFCs shareholders is required to
approve the merger and the related transactions? |
|
A: |
|
The proposal to approve the merger and the related transactions
will be approved if it receives the affirmative vote of a
majority of the votes entitled to be cast on such proposal.
Abstentions, failures to vote and broker non-votes
will have the same effect as votes against the merger and the
related transactions. |
|
|
|
Alan B. Levan, BFCs Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
President, and John E. Abdo, BFCs Vice Chairman,
collectively own, directly or indirectly, and are entitled to
vote approximately 27.7% of the outstanding shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock and approximately 86.3% of the
outstanding shares of BFCs Class B Common Stock,
representing approximately 73.4% of the total voting power of
BFC. Messrs. Abdo and Levan have indicated their intention
to vote their shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock in favor of the merger and the related
transactions. If Messrs. Levan and Abdo so vote their
shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock and Class B
Common Stock to approve the merger and the related transactions,
then the approval of the merger and the related transactions by
BFCs shareholders would be assured. |
ix
|
|
|
Q: |
|
How many shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock
and Class B Common Stock do BFCs executive officers
and directors collectively own? |
|
A: |
|
BFCs executive officers and directors and their respective
affiliates collectively own and are entitled to vote
10,724,118 shares, or approximately 28.0%, of BFCs
Class A Common Stock, and 5,912,570 shares, or
approximately 86.3%, of BFCs Class B Common Stock.
These shares collectively represent approximately 73.4% of the
general voting power of BFC. |
|
Q: |
|
What constitutes a quorum? |
|
A: |
|
The presence at the meeting, in person or by proxy, of holders
of shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock representing a majority of BFCs
voting power as of the BFC record date will constitute a quorum,
permitting the conduct of business at the meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
May I vote in person? |
|
A: |
|
If your shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock or
Class B Common Stock are registered directly in your name
with BFCs transfer agent, you will be considered the
shareholder of record of those shares, and the proxy materials
and proxy card are being sent directly to you by BFC. If you are
a BFC shareholder of record, you may attend the BFC special
meeting and vote your shares in person, rather than signing and
returning your proxy card or otherwise transmitting your voting
instructions as described on the proxy card. |
|
|
|
If your shares of BFC Class A Common Stock or Class B
Common Stock are held in a brokerage account or by another
nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held
in street name, and the proxy materials are being
forwarded to you together with a voting instruction card. As the
beneficial owner, you are also invited to attend the BFC special
meeting. Since a beneficial owner is not the shareholder of
record, you may not vote these shares in person at the meeting
unless you obtain a legal proxy from the broker,
trustee or nominee that holds your shares, giving you the right
to vote the shares in person. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
If my shares are held in street name by my
broker, will my broker vote my shares without instructions from
me? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
No. Because the proposal relating to the merger and the
related transactions is not considered a routine
matter, if your shares of BFCs Class A Common
Stock or Class B Common Stock are held in street
name and you have not provided voting instructions to your
broker or nominee, then your broker or nominee may not vote your
shares in its discretion on the proposal. Accordingly, your
broker will vote your shares for you on the merger and the
related transactions only if you provide instructions to your
broker on how to vote your shares. You should follow the
directions provided by your broker regarding how to instruct
your broker to vote your shares. Without instructions, your
shares will not be voted on the merger and the related
transactions and the broker non-votes of such shares
will have the effect of a vote against the merger and the
related transactions. |
|
Q: |
|
What happens if I do not attend the meeting and fail to
return a proxy card or otherwise provide voting
instructions? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
The failure to return your proxy card or otherwise provide
voting instructions will have the same effect as voting against
the merger and the related transactions. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What do I need to do now? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
After carefully reading and considering the information
contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, please
complete, sign and date your proxy and return it in the enclosed
postage-paid return envelope or otherwise transmit your voting
instructions as described on the enclosed proxy card so that
your shares may be represented at the meeting. If you sign and
send in your proxy and do not indicate how you want to vote, BFC
will count your proxy as a vote FOR the merger and
the related transactions. |
x
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Can I change my vote after I have mailed my signed
proxy? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. You can change your vote at any time before your proxy is
voted at the meeting. If you are the record owner of your
shares, you can do this in one of three ways. First, you can
send a written notice to BFCs Secretary stating that you
would like to revoke your proxy. Second, you can complete and
submit by mail a new valid proxy bearing a later date or
transmit new voting instructions by telephone or internet as
described on the proxy card. Third, you can attend the meeting
and vote in person; however, attendance at the meeting will not
in and of itself constitute revocation of a previously executed
proxy. |
|
|
|
If you are not the record owner of your shares and your shares
are held in street name, you must contact your
broker, bank or other nominee to find out how to change your
vote. |
|
Q: |
|
Are there any other matters to be acted upon at the BFC
special meeting? |
|
A: |
|
No. The only matter to be acted upon at the meeting is the
proposal to approve the merger and the related transactions,
including the amendment to BFCs Amended and Restated
Articles of Incorporation increasing the number of authorized
shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock from
100,000,000 shares to 150,000,000 shares. |
|
Q: |
|
Who can help answer my questions? |
|
A: |
|
If you are a BFC shareholder, and would like additional copies,
without charge, of this joint proxy statement/prospectus or if
you have questions about the merger and the related
transactions, including the procedures for voting your shares,
you should call the information agent for the merger, Georgeson
Inc.,
toll-free
at (888)
666-2593.
|
|
|
|
BFCs shareholders may also contact:
|
|
|
|
BFC Financial Corporation |
Attn: Investor Relations
2100 West Cypress Creek Road
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
Phone:
(954) 940-4994
Email: InvestorRelations@BFCFinancial.com
xi
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE WOODBRIDGE ANNUAL MEETING
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Where and when is the Woodbridge annual meeting? |
|
A: |
|
Woodbridges annual meeting of shareholders will be held at
the Corporate Center, 2100 West Cypress Creek Road, Fort
Lauderdale, Florida 33309 on September 21, 2009 commencing
at 12:00 p.m., local time. |
|
Q: |
|
Who can vote at the Woodbridge annual meeting? |
|
A: |
|
Record holders of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock
and record holders of Woodbridges Class B Common
Stock as of the close of business on August 18, 2009 (the
Woodbridge record date) may vote at the Woodbridge
annual meeting. As of the close of business on the Woodbridge
record date, 16,637,132 shares of Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock and 243,807 shares of Woodbridges
Class B Common Stock were outstanding. |
|
Q: |
|
What will Woodbridges shareholders be asked to vote
on at the meeting? |
|
A: |
|
As described above and in the notice of annual meeting of
Woodbridges shareholders, Woodbridges shareholders
will be asked to consider and vote upon the proposal to approve
the merger agreement. In accordance with the FBCA, the merger
cannot be completed unless the merger agreement is approved by
Woodbridges shareholders. |
|
|
|
In addition to the proposal relating to the merger agreement,
Woodbridges shareholders will also be asked to consider
and vote upon the proposal to elect three directors to
Woodbridges board of directors to serve until the earlier
of Woodbridges 2012 annual meeting of shareholders and the
consummation of the merger as well as any other matters which
may properly be brought before the meeting or any adjournment or
postponement thereof. |
|
Q: |
|
What are the voting rights of Woodbridges
shareholders? |
|
A: |
|
Holders of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock will vote as one class on each of the
proposal relating to the merger agreement and the proposal
relating to the election of directors. Holders of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock are entitled to one
vote per share on each proposal, with all shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock representing in the
aggregate 53% of the general voting power of Woodbridge. The
number of votes represented by each share of Woodbridges
Class B Common Stock, which represents in the aggregate 47%
of the general voting power of Woodbridge, is calculated in
accordance with Woodbridges Amended and Restated Articles
of Incorporation. At the Woodbridge annual meeting, each
outstanding share of Woodbridges Class B Common Stock
will be entitled to 60.5138 votes on each of the proposal
relating to the merger agreement and the proposal relating to
the election of directors. |
|
Q: |
|
What are my choices when voting on the merger
agreement? |
|
A: |
|
With respect to the vote on the merger agreement, you may vote
for or against the merger agreement, or you may abstain from
voting on the merger agreement. |
|
Q: |
|
What vote of Woodbridges shareholders is required to
approve the merger agreement? |
|
A: |
|
Under the FBCA, approval of the merger agreement requires the
affirmative vote of holders of shares of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock
representing a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on the
proposal. Abstentions, failures to vote and broker
non-votes will have the same effect as votes cast against
the approval of the merger agreement. |
|
|
|
BFC owns approximately 22% of the outstanding shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock and all of the
outstanding shares of Woodbridges Class B Common
Stock, representing approximately 59% of the total voting power
of Woodbridge. BFC has agreed to vote its shares in favor of the
merger agreement. As a result, the approval of the merger
agreement by Woodbridges shareholders is assured. |
xii
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Are any other shareholders of Woodbridge committed to vote
for the approval of the merger agreement? |
|
A: |
|
Except for BFCs agreement to vote its shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock and Class B
Common Stock in favor of the merger agreement, there are no
agreements or arrangements pursuant to which any shareholder of
Woodbridge has committed to vote for or against the approval of
the merger agreement. However, it is anticipated that BFCs
directors and executive officers, who collectively own less than
1% of the outstanding shares of Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock (other than the shares beneficially owned through
BFC), will vote their shares of Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock in favor of the approval of the merger agreement
although they are not required to do so. |
|
Q: |
|
What are my choices when voting on the election of
directors? |
|
A: |
|
With respect to the vote on the election of directors, you may
vote for all nominees, or your vote may be withheld with respect
to one or more nominees. |
|
Q: |
|
What is the recommendation of Woodbridges board of
directors with respect to the merger agreement and the election
of directors? |
|
A: |
|
As described above and throughout this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, the board of directors of Woodbridge
recommends a vote FOR the approval of the merger
agreement. The board of directors of Woodbridge also recommends
a vote FOR the election of all of the nominees for
director. |
|
Q: |
|
What vote is required to approve the election of
directors? |
|
A: |
|
The affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes cast at the
Woodbridge annual meeting is required to approve the election of
directors. A properly executed proxy marked WITHHOLD
AUTHORITY with respect to the election of one or more
directors will not be voted with respect to the director or
directors indicated, although it will be counted for purposes of
determining whether or not a quorum exists. |
|
Q: |
|
How many shares of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock and Class B Common Stock do Woodbridges
executive officers and directors collectively own? |
|
A: |
|
Woodbridges executive officers and directors and their
respective affiliates, which includes BFC, collectively own and
are entitled to vote 3,848,530 shares, or approximately
23.1%, of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock. BFC
beneficially owns all of the outstanding shares of
Woodbridges Class B Common Stock. |
|
Q: |
|
What constitutes a quorum? |
|
A: |
|
A quorum will be present at the Woodbridge annual meeting, if
shares representing a majority of the aggregate voting power of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock and Class B
Common Stock outstanding on the Woodbridge record date are
represented, in person or by proxy, at the meeting. |
|
Q: |
|
May I vote in person? |
|
A: |
|
If your shares of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock
are registered directly in your name with Woodbridges
transfer agent, you will be considered the shareholder of record
of those shares, and the proxy materials and proxy card are
being sent directly to you by Woodbridge. If you are a
Woodbridge shareholder of record, you may attend the Woodbridge
annual meeting and vote your shares in person, rather than
signing and returning your proxy card or otherwise transmitting
your voting instructions as described on the proxy card. |
|
|
|
If your shares of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock
are held in a brokerage account or by another nominee, you are
considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street
name, and the proxy materials are being forwarded to you
together with a voting instruction card. As the beneficial
owner, you are also invited to attend the Woodbridge annual
meeting. Since a beneficial owner is not the shareholder of
record, you may not vote these shares in person at the
Woodbridge annual meeting unless you obtain a legal
proxy from the broker, trustee or nominee that holds your
shares, giving you the right to vote the shares in person. |
xiii
|
|
|
Q: |
|
If my shares are held in street name by my
broker, will my broker vote my shares without instructions from
me? |
|
A: |
|
If your shares of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock
are held in street name and you have not provided
voting instructions to your broker or nominee, then whether your
broker or nominee may vote your shares in its discretion depends
on the proposals before the Woodbridge annual meeting. Your
broker or nominee may vote your shares in its discretion on
routine matters. The vote with respect to the merger
agreement is not a routine matter. Accordingly, your
broker will vote your shares for you on the merger agreement
only if you provide instructions to your broker on how to vote
your shares. You should follow the directions provided by your
broker regarding how to instruct your broker to vote your
shares. Without instructions, your shares will not be voted on
the merger agreement and the broker non-votes of
such shares will have the effect of a vote against the approval
of the merger agreement. |
|
|
|
The election of directors is a routine matter on which your
broker or nominee will be permitted to vote your shares if no
instructions are furnished. |
|
Q: |
|
What happens if I do not attend the Woodbridge annual
meeting and fail to return a proxy card or otherwise provide
voting instructions? |
|
A: |
|
The failure to return your proxy card or otherwise provide
voting instructions will have the same effect as voting against
the merger agreement, but will have no effect on the vote
relating to the election of directors. |
|
Q: |
|
What do I need to do now? |
|
A: |
|
After carefully reading and considering the information
contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, please
complete, sign and date your proxy and return it in the enclosed
postage-paid return envelope or otherwise transmit your voting
instructions as described on the proxy card so that your shares
may be represented at the Woodbridge annual meeting. If you sign
and send in your proxy and do not indicate how you want to vote,
Woodbridge will count your proxy as a vote FOR the
merger agreement and FOR each of the nominees for
director. Additionally, although the board of directors of
Woodbridge is not aware of any other matters to be presented at
the Woodbridge annual meeting, if any other matters are properly
brought before the meeting, the persons named in the enclosed
proxy will vote the proxies in accordance with their judgment on
those matters. |
|
Q: |
|
Can I change my vote after I have mailed my signed
proxy? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. You can change your vote at any time before your proxy is
voted at the Woodbridge annual meeting. If you are the record
owner of your shares, you can do this in one of three ways.
First, you can send a written notice to Woodbridges
Secretary stating that you would like to revoke your proxy.
Second, you can complete and submit by mail a new valid proxy
bearing a later date or transmit new voting instructions by
telephone or internet as described on the proxy card. Third, you
can attend the Woodbridge annual meeting and vote in person;
however, attendance at the Woodbridge annual meeting will not in
and of itself constitute revocation of a previously executed
proxy. |
|
|
|
If you are not the record owner of your shares and your shares
are held in street name, you must contact your
broker, bank or other nominee to find out how to change your
vote. |
|
Q: |
|
Are there any other matters to be acted upon at the
Woodbridge annual meeting? |
|
A: |
|
The board of directors of Woodbridge is not aware of any other
matters to be presented or acted upon at the Woodbridge annual
meeting. If any other matter is presented at the Woodbridge
annual meeting on which a vote may properly be taken, the shares
represented by proxies will be voted in accordance with the
judgment of the person or persons voting those shares. |
xiv
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Who can help answer my questions? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
If you are a Woodbridge shareholder, and would like additional
copies, without charge, of this joint proxy statement/prospectus
or if you have questions about the merger agreement or the
election of directors, including the procedures for voting your
shares on such proposals, you should call the information agent
for the merger, Georgeson Inc., toll-free at (877)
255-0124. |
Woodbridges shareholders may also contact:
Woodbridge Holdings Corporation
Attn: Investor Relations
2100 West Cypress Creek Road
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
Phone:
(954) 940-4995
Email: InvestorRelations@WoodbridgeHoldings.com
xv
SUMMARY
This summary highlights selected information from this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. This summary may not contain all of
the information that is important to you. To understand the
merger fully and for a more complete description of the legal
terms of the merger, you should carefully read this entire joint
proxy statement/prospectus, including, in particular, the copies
of the merger agreement and the opinions of JMP Securities LLC,
BFCs financial advisor, and Allen C. Ewing &
Co., Woodbridges financial advisor, that are attached as
annexes to this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Page
references have been included parenthetically to direct you to a
more complete description of the topics presented in this
summary.
General
The
Companies (pages 111 and 225)
BFC Financial Corporation
2100 West Cypress Creek Road
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
(954) 940-4900
BFC is a diversified holding company whose major holdings
include controlling interests in BankAtlantic Bancorp and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries and Woodbridge and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries. BankAtlantic Bancorp is a Florida-based financial
services holding company which owns BankAtlantic, a federally
chartered, federally insured savings bank. BFC currently owns
approximately 23% of the outstanding shares of BankAtlantic
Bancorps Class A Common Stock and all of the
outstanding shares of BankAtlantic Bancorps Class B
Common Stock, representing approximately 30% of BankAtlantic
Bancorps total common stock and 59% of the general voting
power of BankAtlantic Bancorp. As a result of this controlling
position, BFC is a unitary savings bank holding
company regulated by the Office of Thrift Supervision (the
OTS). With respect to its controlling interest in
Woodbridge, BFC currently owns approximately 22% of the
outstanding shares of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock and all of the outstanding shares of Woodbridges
Class B Common Stock, representing approximately 24% of
Woodbridges total common stock and 59% of the general
voting power of Woodbridge. BFCs holdings also include a
non-controlling interest in Benihana, which operates
Asian-themed restaurant chains in the United States.
Historically, BFCs business strategy has been to invest in
and acquire businesses in diverse industries either directly or
through controlled subsidiaries. BFC believes that the best
potential for growth is likely through the growth of the
companies it currently controls and its focus is to provide
overall support for its controlled subsidiaries with a view to
the improved performance of the organization as a whole. BFC,
itself, has no significant operations other than activities
relating to the monitoring and managing of its existing
investments and the identification, analysis and, in appropriate
cases, acquisition of new investments.
Woodbridge Holdings Corporation
2100 West Cypress Creek Road
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
(954) 940-4950
Woodbridge (which was formerly known as Levitt Corporation),
directly and through its wholly owned subsidiaries, historically
has been a real estate development company with activities in
the Southeastern United States. Historically,
Woodbridges operations were primarily within the real
estate industry; however, Woodbridges recent business
strategy has included the pursuit of investments and
acquisitions within or outside of the real estate industry, as
well as the continued development of master-planned communities
through its wholly owned subsidiary, Core Communities.
Woodbridge also owns approximately 31% of the outstanding common
stock of Bluegreen, a New York Stock Exchange-traded corporation
(BXG) which develops and markets vacation ownership interests in
resorts generally located in popular high-volume,
drive-to vacation destinations and acquires,
develops and subdivides property and markets residential land
1
homesites, the majority of which are sold directly to retail
customers who seek to build a home in a high quality residential
setting, in some cases on properties featuring a golf course and
related amenities. Woodbridge is currently working with
Bluegreen to explore avenues for assisting Bluegreen in
obtaining liquidity for its receivables, which may include,
among other potential alternatives, Woodbridge forming a broker
dealer to raise capital through private or public offerings. In
addition, Woodbridge holds investments in Office Depot, Inc.
(Office Depot), a global supplier of office products
and services, and Pizza Fusion Holdings, Inc. (Pizza
Fusion), which operates restaurant franchises in a niche
market within the quick service and organic food industries, and
conducts other activities through Cypress Creek Capital
Holdings, LLC (Cypress Creek Capital) and Snapper
Creek Equity Management, LLC (Snapper Creek).
The
Merger (page 56)
On July 2, 2009, BFC and Woodbridge entered into the merger
agreement, which is the legal document governing the merger.
Subject to the terms and conditions of the merger agreement,
Woodbridge will be merged with and into Merger Sub, a newly
formed wholly owned subsidiary of BFC. Upon the completion of
the merger, Woodbridges separate corporate existence will
cease and its Class A Common Stock will no longer be
publicly traded.
The
Merger Consideration (page 90)
At the effective time of the merger, each outstanding share of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock (other than shares
owned by BFC and holders of Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock who exercise and perfect their appraisal rights)
will be converted automatically into the right to receive
3.47 shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock. BFC
will not issue fractional shares of its Class A Common
Stock in the merger, but instead, the aggregate number of shares
of BFCs Class A Common Stock to which holders of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock will be entitled to
receive will be rounded up to the next largest whole number. The
closing price, as quoted on the Pink Sheets, of BFCs
Class A Common Stock on July 2, 2009, the last trading
day prior to the public announcement of the merger agreement,
and on August 14, 2009, the last trading day prior to the
date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, was $0.40 per
share and $0.49 per share, respectively. The closing price, as
quoted on the Pink Sheets, of Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock on July 2, 2009, the last trading day prior to
the public announcement of the merger agreement, and on
August 14, 2009, the last trading day prior to the date of
this joint proxy statement/prospectus, was $1.10 per share and
$1.45 per share, respectively. Shareholders of both companies
are encouraged to obtain current market quotations prior to
voting their shares.
The shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock to be
received in exchange for shares of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock are referred to in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus as the merger consideration.
Treatment
of Woodbridge Restricted Stock Awards and Stock Options
Outstanding under Woodbridges Amended and Restated 2003
Stock Incentive Plan (page 90)
Upon consummation of the merger, Woodbridges Amended and
Restated 2003 Stock Incentive Plan will be assumed by BFC and
all outstanding restricted stock awards issued thereunder will
be converted into restricted stock awards of shares of
BFCs Class A Common Stock on the same terms and
conditions and with the same restrictions, but with appropriate
adjustments made to the number of shares subject to such
restricted stock awards based on the exchange ratio of
3.47 shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock for
each share of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock.
All options to purchase shares of Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock outstanding at the effective time of the merger
will be canceled in connection with the merger, and the holders
thereof will not receive any consideration as a result of such
cancellation. In agreeing to this treatment of Woodbridges
options, Woodbridges special committee and board of
directors considered the fact that, as of the date of the merger
agreement, all such options were, and, for the foreseeable
future, all such options are expected to be,
out-of-the-money with exercise prices greatly
exceeding the current market price of Woodbridges
Class A Common
2
Stock. However, it is anticipated that some or all of the
directors and executive officers of Woodbridge will be granted
BFC stock options or other equity-based compensation awards of
BFC following the merger.
Articles
of Incorporation and By-laws of BFC Following the Merger
(page 83)
In connection with the merger, BFCs Amended and Restated
Articles of Incorporation will be amended to increase the
authorized number of shares of BFCs Class A Common
Stock from 100,000,000 shares to 150,000,000 shares.
In addition, BFCs board of directors has approved
amendments to BFCs By-laws which, effective upon
consummation of the merger, will increase the maximum number of
members of the board of directors of BFC from 12 to 15 and
provide that each director elected or appointed to BFCs
board of directors on or after the effective date of the merger
will serve for a term expiring at BFCs next annual meeting
of shareholders. As a result of the latter amendment (and
subject to any future amendments), following BFCs 2012
annual meeting of shareholders, BFCs board of directors
will no longer be divided into multiple classes serving
staggered terms. Shareholder approval of the amendments to
BFCs By-laws is not required. The Articles of Amendment to
BFCs Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation and
BFCs By-laws, as so amended, will be as set forth on
Annexes D and E, respectively, and you are urged to read
them carefully.
Board of
Directors and Executive Officers of BFC Following the Merger
(page 84)
Currently, there are five persons serving on the board of
directors of BFC, each of whom will continue to serve as
directors of BFC following the merger. Additionally, in
connection with the merger, BFC has agreed to cause the
following nine individuals to be appointed to the board of
directors of BFC to serve for a term expiring at BFCs 2010
annual meeting of shareholders: James Blosser, Darwin Dornbush,
S. Lawrence Kahn, III, Alan J. Levy, Joel Levy, William
Nicholson and William Scherer, the seven current directors of
Woodbridge who are not also directors of BFC, Seth M. Wise, the
President of Woodbridge, and Jarett S. Levan, the President of
BankAtlantic Bancorp and President and Chief Executive Officer
of BankAtlantic.
The executive officers of BFC in office immediately prior to the
effective time of the merger will hold the same positions upon
completion of the merger. In addition, Seth Wise, the President
of Woodbridge, will serve as Executive Vice President of BFC
effective upon consummation of the merger.
Ownership
of BFC Following the Merger (page 84)
Based on the number of outstanding shares of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock (other than shares owned by BFC) and
BFCs Class A Common Stock, and assuming no holders of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock choose to assert and
exercise their appraisal rights, immediately following the
merger, Woodbridges shareholders (other than BFC) will own
approximately 54% and BFCs shareholders will own
approximately 46% of the then-outstanding shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock, and each of Woodbridges
shareholders (other than BFC) and BFCs shareholders will
own approximately 50% of BFCs total outstanding common
equity. Immediately following the merger, shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock will
represent in the aggregate 22% and 78%, respectively, of the
general voting power of BFC and approximately 92% and 8%,
respectively, of the total outstanding common equity of BFC.
Operations
of Woodbridge and BFC Prior to and After the Effective Time of
the Merger (page 82)
Both Woodbridge and BFC expect to, and have agreed in the merger
agreement to, conduct their respective businesses prior to the
effective time of the merger in the usual and ordinary course,
consistent with their existing business and investment
strategies and operational plans. With respect to Woodbridge,
this may include, among other things, the continued pursuit of
investments and acquisitions within or outside of the real
estate industry and providing support to its existing
investments, including additional investments in affiliates such
as Bluegreen, among others. Further, BFC expects to continue
providing support for its controlled subsidiaries with a view to
the improved performance of the organization as a whole, and
this business strategy may include additional investments in its
controlled subsidiaries such as BankAtlantic Bancorp.
Following the merger, BFC expects that both it and Woodbridge
(as a wholly owned subsidiary of BFC) will continue to conduct
their respective businesses in the usual and ordinary course.
BFC intends to allocate
3
resources within the consolidated group among BFCs
investments and subsidiaries in a manner which its board of
directors believes to be beneficial to BFCs shareholders.
It is currently anticipated that BFC will make additional
investments in BankAtlantic Bancorp, whether in BankAtlantic
Bancorps previously announced $100 million rights
offering to its shareholders or otherwise, and may also make
additional investments in Bluegreen, Core Communities or
Benihana.
Termination
of Woodbridges Shareholder Rights Plan; Anticipated
Adoption by BFC of Shareholder Rights Plan
(page 84)
Woodbridge currently has in place a shareholder rights plan
which was adopted in an effort to preserve Woodbridges
ability to utilize its net operating loss carryforwards to
offset future taxable income. The shareholder rights plan was
designed to prevent Woodbridge from experiencing an
ownership change for purposes of Section 382 of
the Code by causing substantial dilution to any person or group
that acquires 5% or more of the outstanding shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock without the approval
of Woodbridges board of directors. Woodbridges board
of directors has agreed to exempt the merger from the operation
of the shareholder rights plan and committed to exercise its
right to terminate the shareholder rights plan at the effective
time of the merger.
In connection with the termination of Woodbridges
shareholder rights plan, BFC intends to adopt a shareholder
rights plan substantially similar to the one in place at
Woodbridge in an effort to preserve available net operating loss
carryforwards for potential utilization as an offset against
future taxable income. As contemplated, the plan, if triggered,
would result in substantial dilution to any person or group that
acquires 5% or more of BFCs outstanding common stock
without the approval of BFCs board of directors.
Anticipated
Accounting Treatment (page 89)
The merger will be accounted for as an equity transaction by BFC
for financial reporting and accounting purposes under
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The results
of operations of Woodbridge will continue to be included in the
consolidated financial statements of BFC.
Appraisal
Rights (page 85)
Under the FBCA, holders of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock who do not vote for the approval of the merger agreement
and who properly exercise their appraisal rights with respect to
the merger will be entitled to receive a cash payment equal to
the fair value of their shares. The receipt of cash
in exchange for shares of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock will be a taxable transaction. Pursuant to the FBCA, fair
value of the shares of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock held by a Woodbridge shareholder exercising appraisal
rights means the value of such shares calculated as of the time
immediately preceding the consummation of the merger excluding
any appreciation or depreciation in anticipation of the merger,
which amount could be more than, less than or equal to the value
of the shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock that the
shareholder would otherwise have received in connection with the
merger. Merely voting against the approval of the merger
agreement will not serve to assert the appraisal rights of a
holder of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock under the
FBCA. In addition, a proxy submitted by a record holder of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock not marked
Against or Abstain will be voted
For the approval of the merger agreement and,
accordingly, will result in the waiver of such record
holders appraisal rights. Annex F to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus contains the full text of
Sections 607.1301 through 607.1333 of the FBCA, which
relate to appraisal rights. You are encouraged to read these
provisions carefully and in their entirety. BFCs
obligation to consummate the merger is conditioned upon holders
of not more than 10% of the outstanding shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock exercising, or
remaining entitled to exercise, appraisal rights for their
shares.
Under the FBCA, BFCs shareholders will not be entitled to
appraisal rights in connection with the merger.
4
Risks
(page 19)
In evaluating the merger agreement, the merger and the related
transactions, you should carefully read this joint proxy
statement/prospectus in its entirety, including all of the
annexes hereto, and especially consider the factors discussed in
the section entitled Risk Factors beginning on
page 19.
Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger
(page 87)
The merger has been structured to qualify as a tax-free
reorganization under Section 368(a) of the
Code. Accordingly, a holder of Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock generally will not recognize any gain or loss for
U.S. federal income tax purposes upon the exchange of his,
her or its shares of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock
for shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock. Each holder
of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock will have a tax
basis in the shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock that
he, she or it receives in the merger equal to his, her or its
current tax basis in his, her or its shares of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock.
Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson,
P.A. (Stearns Weaver) will issue an opinion to BFC
and Woodbridge as of the date on which the merger is consummated
to the effect that the merger will qualify as a tax-free
reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code
and that BFC and Woodbridge will each be a party to that
reorganization under Section 368(b) of the Code.
This summary may not be applicable to all holders of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock. You should read the
section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled
The Merger Material U.S. Federal Income
Tax Consequences of the Merger for a more complete
discussion of the U.S. federal income tax consequences of
the merger. Tax matters can be complicated, and the tax
consequences of the merger to you will depend on your particular
tax situation. You are urged to consult your tax advisor to
determine the tax consequences of the merger to you.
Recommendation
of BFCs Board of Directors (page 60)
After careful evaluation and consideration of the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and the
advice of its financial advisor, the board of directors of BFC
determined that the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby are advisable, fair to and in the best
interests of BFC and its shareholders. Accordingly, the board of
directors of BFC approved the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby and recommends that BFCs
shareholders vote FOR the merger and the related
transactions.
To review the background of, and BFCs reasons for, the
merger, as well as certain risks related to the merger, see, in
particular, the sections of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus entitled The Merger
Background of the Merger, The Merger
Recommendation of the BFC Board and its Reasons for the
Merger and Risk Factors.
Opinion
of BFCs Financial Advisor (page 65)
JMP Securities LLC (JMP Securities) delivered its
opinion to the BFC board of directors that, as of the date of
its opinion and based upon and subject to the assumptions,
qualifications and limitations set forth therein, the exchange
ratio of 3.47 shares of BFCs Class A Common
Stock for each share of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock was fair, from a financial point of view, to BFCs
shareholders.
The full text of JMP Securities opinion, dated
July 2, 2009, which sets forth, among other things, the
assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and
limitations on the review undertaken by JMP Securities in
rendering its opinion is attached as Annex B to this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. JMP Securities opinion is
directed to the board of directors of BFC in connection with its
consideration of the merger. JMP Securities opinion is not
a recommendation as to how BFCs shareholders should vote
at BFCs special meeting on the merger and the related
transactions. You are urged to read JMP Securities opinion
carefully and in its entirety.
5
Recommendations
of Woodbridges Special Committee and Board of Directors
(pages 62 and 63)
The board of directors of Woodbridge designated a special
committee comprised of independent directors to, among other
things, negotiate, review and evaluate the terms and conditions,
and, with the assistance of its legal counsel and financial
advisor, determine the advisability of, the merger. After such
negotiation, review and evaluation, the Woodbridge special
committee determined that the merger is advisable, fair to and
in the best interests of Woodbridges shareholders. On the
basis of such determination, the Woodbridge special committee
recommended that the full board of directors of Woodbridge
approve the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby and recommend to the shareholders of Woodbridge that
they approve the merger agreement.
After careful evaluation and consideration of the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and careful
consideration of the recommendation of the Woodbridge special
committee and the advice of its financial advisor, the board of
directors of Woodbridge determined that the merger agreement and
the transactions contemplated thereby are advisable, fair to and
in the best interests of Woodbridges shareholders.
Accordingly, the board of directors of Woodbridge approved the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and
recommends that Woodbridges shareholders vote
FOR the approval of the merger agreement.
To review the background of, and Woodbridges reasons for,
the merger, as well as certain risks related to the merger, see,
in particular, the sections of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus entitled The Merger
Background of the Merger, The Merger
Recommendation of the Woodbridge Board and its Reasons for the
Merger and Risk Factors.
Opinion
of Woodbridges Financial Advisor (page 73)
Allen C. Ewing & Co. (Ewing) delivered its
opinion to the Woodbridge special committee and board of
directors, that, as of the date of its opinion and based upon
and subject to the factors, limitations and assumptions set
forth therein, the consideration to be received by holders of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock pursuant to the
merger agreement was fair, from a financial point of view, to
such holders.
The full text of the written opinion of Ewing, dated
July 2, 2009, which sets forth the assumptions made,
procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the
review undertaken in connection with the opinion, is attached to
this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex C. Ewing
provided its opinion for the information and assistance of the
Woodbridge special committee and board of directors in
connection with their consideration of the merger. Ewings
opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any Woodbridge
shareholder on whether or not to support the merger or as to how
such shareholder should vote on the merger agreement. You are
urged to read Ewings fairness opinion carefully and in its
entirety.
Trading
of BFCs Class A Common Stock and Deregistration of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock (page 85)
The shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock to be issued
in connection with the merger, like the shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock which are currently outstanding, will
be listed for trading on the Pink Sheets under the symbol
BFCF.PK. In the future, BFC may apply for its
Class A Common Stock to be listed on the New York Stock
Exchange or the NASDAQ Stock Market if its Class A Common
Stock meets the requirements for listing on either of those
exchanges.
If the merger is consummated, all of the shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock and Class B
Common Stock will be canceled, and Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock will no longer be listed for trading
on the Pink Sheets or registered under the Exchange Act.
Interests
of Certain Persons in the Merger (page 82)
Shareholders should note that some directors or executive
officers of each of BFC and Woodbridge have interests in the
merger that are different from, or are in addition to, the
interests of BFCs and Woodbridges shareholders,
generally. Specifically, Alan B. Levan, the Chairman, Chief
Executive Officer and President of
6
BFC, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Woodbridge and
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Chairman of Bluegreen, John E. Abdo,
the Vice Chairman of each of BFC, Woodbridge, BankAtlantic
Bancorp and Bluegreen, and their respective affiliates
collectively beneficially own shares of BFCs Class A
Common Stock and Class B Common Stock (including shares
which may be acquired pursuant to the exercise of stock options)
representing approximately 74.2% of the general voting power and
approximately 37.4% of the total common stock of BFC, and, after
the completion of the merger, are expected to beneficially own
shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock and Class B
Common Stock (including shares which may be acquired pursuant to
the exercise of stock options) representing approximately 71.0%
of the general voting power and approximately 19.0% of the total
common stock of BFC. Additionally, in connection with the
merger, BFC has agreed to cause the seven current directors of
Woodbridge who are not also directors of BFC, Seth M. Wise, the
President of Woodbridge, and Jarett S. Levan, the son of Alan B.
Levan and the President of BankAtlantic Bancorp and Chief
Executive Officer and President of BankAtlantic, to be appointed
to BFCs board of directors to serve for a term expiring at
BFCs 2010 annual meeting of shareholders. Further,
Mr. Wise will serve as Executive Vice President of BFC
effective upon consummation of the merger. It is anticipated
that some or all of the directors and executive officers of
Woodbridge, including Alan B. Levan and John E. Abdo, will be
granted BFC stock options or other equity-based compensation
awards of BFC following the merger. Further, while the
Woodbridge stock options, if any, held by these individuals will
be canceled, those stock options currently have exercise prices
which are far greater than the market price of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock. It is expected that the new BFC stock
options granted to them will have exercise prices equal to the
closing market price of BFCs Class A Common Stock on the
date of grant. Additionally, following the merger, BFCs
directors and executive officers will continue to receive
compensation, including equity-based compensation, from BFC for
their services and, as permitted by the terms of BFCs
stock incentive plan, it is contemplated that BFCs
compensation committee will, following consummation of the
merger, consider BFCs outstanding stock options with a
view to re-pricing some or all of the BFC stock options
currently held by BFCs directors and executive officers or
cancelling those stock options in connection with the issuance
of new stock options having more favorable terms, including
lower exercise prices. Each of BFCs board of directors and
Woodbridges special committee and board of directors was
aware of these interests.
Regulatory
Matters (page 89)
BFC must comply with applicable federal and state securities
laws in connection with the issuance of the shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock in the merger and the filing of this
joint proxy statement/prospectus with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the SEC).
There are also limitations on the amount of shares of BFCs
common stock that an individual or company can own without
obtaining regulatory approval. Woodbridges shareholders
should read the description of those limitations contained on
page 89 and consult with their legal counsel regarding any
regulatory limitations on their ownership of BFCs common
stock.
Resale of
BFCs Class A Common Stock (page 89)
The shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock to be issued
in connection with the merger will not be subject to any
restrictions on transfer arising under the Securities Act,
except for shares issued to any Woodbridge shareholder who may
be deemed to be an affiliate of Woodbridge or BFC for purposes
of Rule 145 under the Securities Act.
Comparison
of Rights of Common Shareholders of BFC and Woodbridge
(page 106)
Woodbridges shareholders, whose rights are currently
governed by Florida law and Woodbridges Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation and Amended and Restated
By-laws will, upon consummation of the merger, become holders of
BFCs Class A Common Stock (other than holders who
exercise and perfect their appraisal rights), and their rights
will be governed by Florida law and BFCs Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation and BFCs By-laws, which
are different than those of Woodbridge.
7
The
Merger Agreement
The following summary describes certain material provisions
of the merger agreement, which is attached to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus as Annex A and is incorporated by
reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus. This
summary may not contain all the information about the merger
agreement that is important to you and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to the merger agreement. You are
encouraged to carefully read the merger agreement in its
entirety.
Conditions
to Consummation of the Merger (page 91)
A number of conditions must be satisfied or waived before the
merger will be completed, including, among others:
|
|
|
|
|
the approval of the merger and the related transactions and the
merger agreement by BFCs and Woodbridges
shareholders, respectively;
|
|
|
|
the absence of any legal restraints or prohibitions preventing
the completion of the merger or litigation or other proceeding
seeking to enjoin or prohibit the merger;
|
|
|
|
the declaration by the SEC that the registration statement of
which this joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part is
effective and the absence of any stop order or proceeding,
initiated or threatened in writing by the SEC, suspending or
threatening to suspend such effectiveness;
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties of each of BFC and Woodbridge
contained in the merger agreement being true and correct,
subject to certain materiality qualifications;
|
|
|
|
neither BFC nor Woodbridge recording, or finding that it is
reasonably likely to record, other-than-temporary impairment
charges in an aggregate amount greater than
$15 million; and
|
|
|
|
holders of not more than 10% of the outstanding shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock duly and validly
exercising, or remaining entitled to exercise, their appraisal
rights in accordance with the FBCA.
|
The board of directors of either BFC or Woodbridge may in its
sole discretion choose to waive any of the conditions to
consummation of the merger and choose to proceed to closing
notwithstanding the fact that any such condition has not been
fulfilled.
Conduct
of Business by BFC and Woodbridge Prior to Consummation of the
Merger (page 93)
BFC and Woodbridge have each generally agreed that, during the
period from the date of the merger agreement to the earlier of
the consummation of the merger and the termination of the merger
agreement, except as expressly contemplated by the merger
agreement or consented to in writing by BFC or Woodbridge, as
the case may be, each of BFC and Woodbridge will not, among
other things, conduct its business in a manner that is not
consistent with its ordinary course of business and past
practice.
Limitation
on the Solicitation, Negotiation and Discussion of Other
Acquisition Proposals (page 96)
The merger agreement contains restrictions on the ability of
each of BFC and Woodbridge to, among other things, solicit,
negotiate and discuss with third parties other proposals
relating to the acquisition of the companies.
Notwithstanding these restrictions, if at any time prior to the
effective time of the merger, the Woodbridge special committee
or board of directors or the BFC board of directors receives an
unsolicited, bona fide written acquisition proposal not in
violation of the no solicitation provisions of the
merger agreement and the Woodbridge special committee or board
of directors or the BFC board of directors, as the case may be,
reasonably determines in good faith, after consultation with
their financial, legal and other advisors, that such proposal
will result in, or is reasonably expected to result in, a more
favorable proposal to the applicable companys shareholders
from a financial point of view than the merger or other revised
proposal submitted by BFC or Woodbridge and is reasonably
capable of being consummated on the terms proposed, then, after
8
receiving the advice of outside counsel that it may be necessary
to take such actions to comply with its fiduciary duties under
applicable law, Woodbridge or BFC, as the case may be, may
(i) furnish information about its business to the person
making such proposal and (ii) participate in discussions or
negotiations regarding such proposal with the person making such
proposal.
Change of
the Recommendation of the Board of Directors of BFC or
Woodbridge (page 97)
The merger agreement provides that the board of directors of BFC
and Woodbridge may withhold, withdraw, modify or change its
recommendation of the advisability of the merger and the merger
agreement, respectively, or approve or recommend any other
acquisition or similar proposal only if, at any time prior to
the effective time of the merger, a superior proposal (as
described above) was received without violation of the no
solicitation provisions of the merger agreement and the BFC
board of directors or the Woodbridge special committee or board
of directors, as the case may be, determines in good faith and
after consultation with their financial advisors and legal
counsel that the failure to take such actions would be
inconsistent with their fiduciary duties under applicable law.
Termination
of the Merger Agreement (page 98)
The merger agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the
effective time of the merger upon the mutual written consent of
BFC and Woodbridge. In addition, each of BFC and Woodbridge may
terminate the merger agreement under certain circumstances,
including, without limitation:
|
|
|
|
|
if the requisite shareholder approvals are not obtained;
|
|
|
|
if the merger has not been consummated by September 15,
2009 or, provided the parties are proceeding in good faith to
consummate the merger, December 15, 2009;
|
|
|
|
if such companys financial advisor withdraws, revokes,
annuls or materially modifies its fairness opinion; or
|
|
|
|
if the Woodbridge special committee or board of directors or the
BFC board of directors determines to approve or recommend
another acquisition or similar proposal after complying with the
no solicitation provisions of the merger agreement
or withholds or withdraws its recommendation of the merger
agreement in a manner adverse to the other company.
|
9
Market
Prices and Dividend Information
BFCs Class A Common Stock and Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock are listed for trading on the Pink
Sheets under the trading symbols BFCF.PK and
WDGH.PK, respectively. The following table sets
forth the closing prices for BFCs Class A Common
Stock and Woodbridges Class A Common Stock, as quoted
on the Pink Sheets, on July 2, 2009, the last trading day
before the public announcement of the merger agreement, and on
August 14, 2009, the last trading day before the date of
this joint proxy statement/prospectus. The table also includes
the equivalent prices per share of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock that holders of such stock would
receive in connection with the merger if the merger were
completed on either of these dates, applying the exchange ratio
of 3.47 shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock for
each share of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equivalent Value
|
|
|
|
|
Woodbridges
|
|
of
|
|
|
BFCs Class A
|
|
Class A
|
|
Woodbridges Class A
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
July 2, 2009
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
|
$
|
1.39
|
|
August 14, 2009
|
|
$
|
0.49
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
$
|
1.70
|
|
The above table shows only historical comparisons. These
comparisons may not provide meaningful information to BFCs
and Woodbridges shareholders in determining whether to
approve the merger. Shareholders of BFC and Woodbridge are urged
to obtain current market quotations and to carefully review the
other information contained in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus prior to voting their shares.
While there are no restrictions on the payment of cash dividends
by BFC, other than those restrictions contained in the merger
agreement with respect to the interim period between the date of
the merger agreement and the effective time of the merger, BFC
has never paid cash dividends on its common stock. While BFC may
consider declaring and paying dividends in the future with
respect to its Class A Common Stock, there can be no
assurance that it will do so. Future declaration and payment of
cash dividends with respect to BFCs Class A Common
Stock, if any, will be determined in light of the then-current
financial condition of BFC and other factors deemed relevant by
the board of directors of BFC.
Woodbridges board of directors has not adopted a policy of
regular dividend payments. On January 22, 2007,
Woodbridges board of directors declared a cash dividend of
$0.10 per share on its Class A Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock, and this dividend was paid in
February 2007. Since that time, Woodbridge has not declared or
paid dividends on its Class A Common Stock or Class B
Common Stock. The payment of dividends in the future is subject
to approval by Woodbridges board of directors and will
depend upon, among other factors, Woodbridges results of
operations and financial condition. Woodbridge does not expect
to pay dividends to its shareholders for the foreseeable future.
After completion of the merger, only BFC, as the parent company
of Woodbridge, will be entitled to receive dividends or
distributions from Woodbridge, and the former shareholders of
Woodbridge will not be entitled to receive dividends from
Woodbridge.
10
Comparative
Per Share Data
The following table sets forth historical per share information
of BFC and Woodbridge and unaudited pro forma combined per share
information after giving effect to the merger as an equity
transaction. You should not rely on this information as being
indicative of the historical results that would have been
achieved had Woodbridge always been a wholly owned subsidiary of
BFC or the future results that BFC will experience after the
merger. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined per share
data has been derived from and should be read in conjunction
with the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. The historical per share data has
been derived from and should be read in conjunction with the
historical consolidated financial statements of BFC and
Woodbridge which appears elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. The table also includes
(i) Woodbridges equivalent loss from continuing
operations per common share basic and diluted and
(ii) book value per common share, in each case, applying
the exchange ratio of 3.47 shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock for each share of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
BFC HISTORICAL PER COMMON SHARE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations per common share
basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.55
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.62
|
)
|
Book value per common share
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
Cash dividends per common share
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
WOODBRIDGE HISTORICAL PER COMMON SHARE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations per common
share basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
|
$
|
(7.35
|
)
|
Book value per common share
|
|
|
8.43
|
|
|
|
7.07
|
|
Cash dividends per common share
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
BFC UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED PER COMMON SHARE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations per common share
basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.05
|
)
|
Book value per common share
|
|
|
2.28
|
|
|
|
2.26
|
|
Cash dividends per common share
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
WOODBRIDGE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA EQUIVALENT PER COMMON SHARE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations per common share
basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.52
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7.11
|
)
|
Book value per common share
|
|
|
7.91
|
|
|
|
7.84
|
|
Cash dividends per common share
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
11
Selected
Historical Consolidated Financial Information of BFC
The following table summarizes BFCs historical
consolidated financial condition and results as of, and for the
periods ended on, the dates indicated below. The selected
historical consolidated financial data of BFC as of, and for the
years ended, December 31, 2006 through 2008 have been
derived from BFCs audited consolidated financial
statements for those years which appear elsewhere in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus and which were audited by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered certified
public accounting firm. The selected historical consolidated
financial data of BFC as of, and for the six months ended,
June 30, 2009 and 2008 are unaudited (and are not
necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the full
year or any other interim period) and are derived from
BFCs unaudited consolidated financial statements which
appear elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus;
however, BFCs management believes that such amounts
reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of its results of
operations and financial condition as of the dates, and for the
periods, indicated. You should not assume the results of
operations for past periods and for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 indicate results for any future
period. The following information is only a summary and should
be read together with BFCs Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and consolidated financial statements and
related notes which appear elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
As of and for the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share data)
|
|
|
Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BFC Activities
|
|
$
|
952
|
|
|
|
2,504
|
|
|
|
4,408
|
|
|
|
6,109
|
|
|
|
3,682
|
|
|
|
3,129
|
|
|
|
5,683
|
|
Financial Services
|
|
|
184,564
|
|
|
|
235,013
|
|
|
|
449,571
|
|
|
|
520,793
|
|
|
|
507,746
|
|
|
|
445,537
|
|
|
|
358,703
|
|
Real Estate Development
|
|
|
9,945
|
|
|
|
11,779
|
|
|
|
33,491
|
|
|
|
431,665
|
|
|
|
583,152
|
|
|
|
574,824
|
|
|
|
558,838
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195,461
|
|
|
|
249,296
|
|
|
|
487,470
|
|
|
|
958,567
|
|
|
|
1,094,580
|
|
|
|
1,023,490
|
|
|
|
923,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BFC Activities
|
|
|
5,751
|
|
|
|
7,282
|
|
|
|
12,139
|
|
|
|
15,015
|
|
|
|
12,370
|
|
|
|
9,665
|
|
|
|
7,452
|
|
Financial Services
|
|
|
268,493
|
|
|
|
307,162
|
|
|
|
634,970
|
|
|
|
579,458
|
|
|
|
474,311
|
|
|
|
381,916
|
|
|
|
280,431
|
|
Real Estate Development
|
|
|
28,798
|
|
|
|
32,218
|
|
|
|
72,751
|
|
|
|
697,895
|
|
|
|
606,655
|
|
|
|
498,760
|
|
|
|
481,627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303,042
|
|
|
|
346,662
|
|
|
|
719,860
|
|
|
|
1,292,368
|
|
|
|
1,093,336
|
|
|
|
890,341
|
|
|
|
769,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
17,250
|
|
|
|
3,246
|
|
|
|
15,064
|
|
|
|
12,724
|
|
|
|
10,935
|
|
|
|
13,404
|
|
|
|
19,603
|
|
Impairment of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(20,401
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96,579
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of other investments
|
|
|
(2,396
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,548
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on settlement of investment in Woodbridges subsidiary
|
|
|
40,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
before income taxes
|
|
|
(72,759
|
)
|
|
|
(94,120
|
)
|
|
|
(329,453
|
)
|
|
|
(321,077
|
)
|
|
|
12,179
|
|
|
|
146,553
|
|
|
|
173,317
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,279
|
)
|
|
|
15,763
|
|
|
|
(69,012
|
)
|
|
|
(530
|
)
|
|
|
59,566
|
|
|
|
70,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations
|
|
|
(72,759
|
)
|
|
|
(59,841
|
)
|
|
|
(345,216
|
)
|
|
|
(252,065
|
)
|
|
|
12,709
|
|
|
|
86,987
|
|
|
|
102,400
|
|
Discontinued operations, less income taxes
|
|
|
4,201
|
|
|
|
1,019
|
|
|
|
16,605
|
|
|
|
7,160
|
|
|
|
(10,535
|
)
|
|
|
18,074
|
|
|
|
15,819
|
|
Extraordinary gain, less income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,145
|
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(68,558
|
)
|
|
|
(58,822
|
)
|
|
|
(319,466
|
)
|
|
|
(242,502
|
)
|
|
|
2,174
|
|
|
|
105,061
|
|
|
|
118,219
|
|
Less: Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
45,246
|
|
|
|
48,034
|
|
|
|
260,567
|
|
|
|
212,043
|
|
|
|
(4,395
|
)
|
|
|
(92,287
|
)
|
|
|
(103,989
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to BFC
|
|
|
(23,312
|
)
|
|
|
(10,788
|
)
|
|
|
(58,899
|
)
|
|
|
(30,459
|
)
|
|
|
(2,221
|
)
|
|
|
12,774
|
|
|
|
14,230
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
(392
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income allocable to common stock
|
|
$
|
(23,687
|
)
|
|
|
(11,163
|
)
|
|
|
(59,649
|
)
|
|
|
(31,209
|
)
|
|
|
(2,971
|
)
|
|
|
12,024
|
|
|
|
13,838
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Share Data(a),(b),(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share of common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.55
|
)
|
|
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
|
(1.62
|
)
|
|
|
(0.90
|
)
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
0.48
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share from extraordinary items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share of common stock
|
|
$
|
(0.52
|
)
|
|
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
|
(1.32
|
)
|
|
|
(0.81
|
)
|
|
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
As of and for the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except for per share data)
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share of common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.55
|
)
|
|
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
|
(1.62
|
)
|
|
|
(0.90
|
)
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
Earnings per share from extraordinary items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share of common stock
|
|
$
|
(0.52
|
)
|
|
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
|
(1.32
|
)
|
|
|
(0.81
|
)
|
|
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
0.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
45,120
|
|
|
|
45,108
|
|
|
|
45,097
|
|
|
|
38,778
|
|
|
|
33,249
|
|
|
|
28,952
|
|
|
|
24,183
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
45,120
|
|
|
|
45,108
|
|
|
|
45,097
|
|
|
|
38,778
|
|
|
|
33,249
|
|
|
|
31,219
|
|
|
|
27,806
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and leases and held for sale, net
|
|
$
|
4,028,761
|
|
|
|
4,446,514
|
|
|
|
4,317,645
|
|
|
|
4,528,538
|
|
|
|
4,603,505
|
|
|
|
4,628,744
|
|
|
|
4,561,073
|
|
Securities
|
|
$
|
690,596
|
|
|
|
1,227,418
|
|
|
|
979,417
|
|
|
|
1,191,173
|
|
|
|
1,081,980
|
|
|
|
1,064,857
|
|
|
|
1,082,985
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
5,812,997
|
|
|
|
7,165,501
|
|
|
|
6,395,582
|
|
|
|
7,114,433
|
|
|
|
7,605,766
|
|
|
|
7,395,755
|
|
|
|
6,954,847
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
4,055,047
|
|
|
|
3,879,300
|
|
|
|
3,919,796
|
|
|
|
3,953,405
|
|
|
|
3,867,036
|
|
|
|
3,752,676
|
|
|
|
3,457,202
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and federal funds
purchased
|
|
$
|
25,068
|
|
|
|
127,924
|
|
|
|
279,726
|
|
|
|
159,905
|
|
|
|
128,411
|
|
|
|
249,263
|
|
|
|
362,002
|
|
Other borrowings(d)
|
|
$
|
1,266,822
|
|
|
|
2,235,388
|
|
|
|
1,631,367
|
|
|
|
2,071,688
|
|
|
|
2,426,000
|
|
|
|
2,131,976
|
|
|
|
2,086,368
|
|
BFC shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
96,527
|
|
|
|
172,146
|
|
|
|
112,867
|
|
|
|
184,037
|
|
|
|
177,585
|
|
|
|
183,080
|
|
|
|
125,251
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
$
|
229,424
|
|
|
|
503,580
|
|
|
|
262,554
|
|
|
|
558,950
|
|
|
|
698,323
|
|
|
|
696,522
|
|
|
|
612,652
|
|
Total equity
|
|
$
|
325,951
|
|
|
|
675,726
|
|
|
|
375,421
|
|
|
|
742,987
|
|
|
|
875,908
|
|
|
|
879,602
|
|
|
|
737,903
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Since its inception, BFC has not paid any cash dividends on its
common stock. |
|
(b) |
|
While BFC has two classes of common stock outstanding, the
two-class method is not presented because BFCs capital
structure does not provide for different dividend rates or other
preferences, other than voting rights, between the two classes. |
|
(c) |
|
Prior to the merger of I.R.E. Realty Advisory Group, Inc.
(I.R.E. RAG) with and into BFC in
November 2007, I.R.E. RAG owned 4,764,285 shares of
BFCs Class A Common Stock and 500,000 shares of
BFCs Class B Common Stock. Those shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock were
considered to be outstanding; however, because BFC owned 45.5%
of I.R.E. RAGs common stock, 2,165,367 shares of
BFCs Class A Common Stock and 227,250 shares of
BFCs Class B Common Stock were eliminated from the
number of outstanding shares for purposes of computing earnings
per share. |
|
(d) |
|
Other borrowings consist of FHLB advances, subordinated
debentures, notes, bonds payable, secured borrowings and junior
subordinated debentures. Secured borrowings were recognized on
loan participation agreements that constituted a legal sale of a
portion of the loan but that were not qualified to be accounted
for as a loan sale. |
13
Selected
Historical Parent Company Only Financial Information of
BFC
The following table summarizes BFCs historical parent
company only financial condition and results as of, and for the
periods ended on, the dates indicated below. The selected
historical parent company only financial data of BFC as of, and
for the years ended, December 31, 2006 through 2008 have
been derived from BFCs audited consolidated financial
statements for those years which appear elsewhere in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus and which were audited by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered certified
public accounting firm. The selected historical parent company
only financial data of BFC as of, and for the six months ended,
June 30, 2009 and 2008 are unaudited (and are not
necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the full
year or any other interim period) and are derived from
BFCs unaudited consolidated financial statements which
appear elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus;
however, BFCs management believes that such amounts
reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of its results of
operations and financial condition as of the dates, and for the
periods, indicated. You should not assume the results of
operations for past periods and for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 indicate results for any future
period. The following information is only a summary and should
be read together with BFCs Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and consolidated financial statements and
related notes which appear elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
As of and for the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
5,921
|
|
|
|
14,403
|
|
|
|
9,218
|
|
|
|
17,999
|
|
|
|
17,815
|
|
|
|
26,683
|
|
|
|
1,520
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
20,598
|
|
|
|
20,819
|
|
|
|
16,523
|
|
|
|
20,862
|
|
|
|
22,262
|
|
|
|
22,034
|
|
|
|
11,800
|
|
Investment in venture partnerships
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
864
|
|
|
|
908
|
|
|
|
950
|
|
|
|
971
|
|
Investment in BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc.
|
|
|
43,742
|
|
|
|
96,031
|
|
|
|
66,326
|
|
|
|
108,173
|
|
|
|
113,586
|
|
|
|
112,218
|
|
|
|
103,125
|
|
Investment in Woodbridge Holdings Corporation
|
|
|
41,120
|
|
|
|
50,595
|
|
|
|
35,575
|
|
|
|
54,637
|
|
|
|
57,009
|
|
|
|
58,111
|
|
|
|
48,983
|
|
Investment in and advances to wholly-owned subsidiaries
|
|
|
2,241
|
|
|
|
2,691
|
|
|
|
2,323
|
|
|
|
1,578
|
|
|
|
1,525
|
|
|
|
1,631
|
|
|
|
31,867
|
|
Loans receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,782
|
|
|
|
2,157
|
|
|
|
2,071
|
|
|
|
3,364
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
1,145
|
|
|
|
835
|
|
|
|
906
|
|
|
|
2,261
|
|
|
|
960
|
|
|
|
2,697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
115,220
|
|
|
|
186,112
|
|
|
|
131,161
|
|
|
|
208,801
|
|
|
|
217,523
|
|
|
|
224,658
|
|
|
|
204,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,483
|
|
Advances from and negative basis in wholly-owned subsidiaries
|
|
|
798
|
|
|
|
1,088
|
|
|
|
789
|
|
|
|
3,174
|
|
|
|
1,290
|
|
|
|
462
|
|
|
|
34,636
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
6,866
|
|
|
|
6,786
|
|
|
|
6,476
|
|
|
|
7,722
|
|
|
|
7,351
|
|
|
|
7,417
|
|
|
|
6,929
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,868
|
|
|
|
31,297
|
|
|
|
33,699
|
|
|
|
27,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
7,664
|
|
|
|
13,966
|
|
|
|
7,265
|
|
|
|
24,764
|
|
|
|
39,938
|
|
|
|
41,578
|
|
|
|
79,076
|
|
Redeemable 5% Cumulative Preferred Stock
|
|
|
11,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total BFC shareholders equity
|
|
|
96,527
|
|
|
|
172,146
|
|
|
|
112,867
|
|
|
|
184,037
|
|
|
|
177,585
|
|
|
|
183,080
|
|
|
|
125,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
115,220
|
|
|
|
186,112
|
|
|
|
131,161
|
|
|
|
208,801
|
|
|
|
217,523
|
|
|
|
224,658
|
|
|
|
204,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
As of and for the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
616
|
|
|
|
1,137
|
|
|
|
2,489
|
|
|
|
3,977
|
|
|
|
2,232
|
|
|
|
1,775
|
|
|
|
3,514
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
4,035
|
|
|
|
4,813
|
|
|
|
11,405
|
|
|
|
9,565
|
|
|
|
8,413
|
|
|
|
14,904
|
|
|
|
6,717
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) before earnings (loss) from subsidiaries
|
|
|
(3,419
|
)
|
|
|
(3,676
|
)
|
|
|
(8,916
|
)
|
|
|
(5,588
|
)
|
|
|
(6,181
|
)
|
|
|
(13,129
|
)
|
|
|
(3,203
|
)
|
Equity from (loss) earnings in BankAtlantic Bancorp
|
|
|
(24,823
|
)
|
|
|
(10,342
|
)
|
|
|
(56,230
|
)
|
|
|
(7,206
|
)
|
|
|
5,807
|
|
|
|
9,053
|
|
|
|
11,817
|
|
Equity from (loss) earnings in Woodbridge Holdings Corporation
|
|
|
3,771
|
|
|
|
(3,861
|
)
|
|
|
(22,261
|
)
|
|
|
(39,622
|
)
|
|
|
(1,522
|
)
|
|
|
9,125
|
|
|
|
10,265
|
|
Equity from (loss) earnings in other subsidiaries
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(1,083
|
)
|
|
|
(658
|
)
|
|
|
6,671
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(24,570
|
)
|
|
|
(17,996
|
)
|
|
|
(87,392
|
)
|
|
|
(53,499
|
)
|
|
|
(2,554
|
)
|
|
|
11,720
|
|
|
|
18,844
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,046
|
)
|
|
|
(14,887
|
)
|
|
|
(19,599
|
)
|
|
|
(1,857
|
)
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
6,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations
|
|
|
(24,570
|
)
|
|
|
(10,950
|
)
|
|
|
(72,505
|
)
|
|
|
(33,900
|
)
|
|
|
(697
|
)
|
|
|
7,720
|
|
|
|
12,018
|
|
Discontinued operations, net of taxes
|
|
|
1,258
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
4,461
|
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
(1,524
|
)
|
|
|
5,054
|
|
|
|
2,212
|
|
Extraordinary gain, net of taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,145
|
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to BFC
|
|
|
(23,312
|
)
|
|
|
(10,788
|
)
|
|
|
(58,899
|
)
|
|
|
(30,459
|
)
|
|
|
(2,221
|
)
|
|
|
12,774
|
|
|
|
14,230
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
(392
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income allocable to common stock
|
|
$
|
(23,687
|
)
|
|
|
(11,163
|
)
|
|
|
(59,649
|
)
|
|
|
(31,209
|
)
|
|
|
(2,971
|
)
|
|
|
12,024
|
|
|
|
13,838
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statements of Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(23,312
|
)
|
|
|
(10,788
|
)
|
|
|
(58,899
|
)
|
|
|
(30,459
|
)
|
|
|
(2,221
|
)
|
|
|
12,774
|
|
|
|
14,230
|
|
Other operating activities
|
|
|
20,306
|
|
|
|
7,034
|
|
|
|
53,391
|
|
|
|
25,954
|
|
|
|
(820
|
)
|
|
|
(12,709
|
)
|
|
|
(18,243
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
|
|
(3,006
|
)
|
|
|
(3,754
|
)
|
|
|
(5,508
|
)
|
|
|
(4,505
|
)
|
|
|
(3,041
|
)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
(4,013
|
)
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
(2,469
|
)
|
|
|
(30,869
|
)
|
|
|
(923
|
)
|
|
|
(10,029
|
)
|
|
|
(9,577
|
)
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
(804
|
)
|
|
|
35,558
|
|
|
|
(4,904
|
)
|
|
|
35,127
|
|
|
|
13,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(3,297
|
)
|
|
|
(3,596
|
)
|
|
|
(8,781
|
)
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
(8,868
|
)
|
|
|
25,163
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Cash at beginning of period
|
|
|
9,218
|
|
|
|
17,999
|
|
|
|
17,999
|
|
|
|
17,815
|
|
|
|
26,683
|
|
|
|
1,520
|
|
|
|
1,536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of period
|
|
$
|
5,921
|
|
|
|
14,403
|
|
|
|
9,218
|
|
|
|
17,999
|
|
|
|
17,815
|
|
|
|
26,683
|
|
|
|
1,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
Selected
Historical Consolidated Financial Information of
Woodbridge
The following table summarizes Woodbridges historical
consolidated financial condition and results as of, and for the
periods ended on, the dates indicated below. The selected
historical consolidated financial data of Woodbridge as of, and
for the years ended, December 31, 2006 through 2008 have
been derived from Woodbridges audited consolidated
financial statements for those years which appear elsewhere in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus and which were audited by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered certified
public accounting firm. The selected historical consolidated
financial data of Woodbridge as of, and for the six months
ended, June 30, 2009 and 2008 are unaudited (and are not
necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the full
year or any other interim period) and are derived from
Woodbridges unaudited consolidated financial statements
which appear elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus;
however, Woodbridges management believes that such amounts
reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of its results of
operations and financial condition as of the dates, and for the
periods, indicated. You should not assume the results of
operations for past periods and for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 indicate results for any future
period. The following information is only a summary and should
be read together with Woodbridges Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and consolidated financial statements and
related notes which appear elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
As of and for the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Consolidated Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from sales of real estate
|
|
$
|
3,194
|
|
|
|
2,549
|
|
|
|
13,837
|
|
|
|
410,115
|
|
|
|
566,086
|
|
|
|
558,112
|
|
|
|
549,652
|
|
Cost of sales of real estate(a)
|
|
$
|
1,994
|
|
|
|
1,786
|
|
|
|
12,728
|
|
|
|
573,241
|
|
|
|
482,961
|
|
|
|
408,082
|
|
|
|
406,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margin(a)
|
|
$
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
763
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
(163,126
|
)
|
|
|
83,125
|
|
|
|
150,030
|
|
|
|
143,378
|
|
Earnings from Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
$
|
17,050
|
|
|
|
1,737
|
|
|
|
8,996
|
|
|
|
10,275
|
|
|
|
9,684
|
|
|
|
12,714
|
|
|
|
13,068
|
|
Selling, general & administrative expenses
|
|
$
|
21,103
|
|
|
|
25,579
|
|
|
|
50,754
|
|
|
|
117,924
|
|
|
|
121,151
|
|
|
|
87,639
|
|
|
|
71,001
|
|
Impairment of investment in Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
$
|
(20,401
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(94,426
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of other investments
|
|
$
|
(2,396
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary(f)
|
|
$
|
40,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
15,452
|
|
|
|
(19,373
|
)
|
|
|
(140,331
|
)
|
|
|
(234,620
|
)
|
|
|
(9,164
|
)
|
|
|
54,911
|
|
|
|
57,415
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common share(e)
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
|
|
(1.01
|
)
|
|
|
(7.35
|
)
|
|
|
(30.00
|
)
|
|
|
(2.27
|
)
|
|
|
13.58
|
|
|
|
15.19
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share(b)(e)
|
|
$
|
0.91
|
|
|
|
(1.01
|
)
|
|
|
(7.35
|
)
|
|
|
(30.00
|
)
|
|
|
(2.29
|
)
|
|
|
13.44
|
|
|
|
14.91
|
|
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding
(thousands)(c)(e)
|
|
$
|
16,890
|
|
|
|
19,255
|
|
|
|
19,088
|
|
|
|
7,821
|
|
|
|
4,045
|
|
|
|
4,044
|
|
|
|
3,779
|
|
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
(thousands)(c)(e)
|
|
$
|
16,890
|
|
|
|
19,255
|
|
|
|
19,088
|
|
|
|
7,821
|
|
|
|
4,045
|
|
|
|
4,067
|
|
|
|
3,792
|
|
Dividends declared per common share(e)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
Consolidated Financial Condition Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
58,158
|
|
|
|
125,307
|
|
|
|
114,798
|
|
|
|
195,181
|
|
|
|
48,391
|
|
|
|
113,562
|
|
|
|
125,522
|
|
Inventory of real estate
|
|
$
|
243,564
|
|
|
|
242,185
|
|
|
|
241,318
|
|
|
|
227,290
|
|
|
|
822,040
|
|
|
|
611,260
|
|
|
|
413,471
|
|
Investment in Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
$
|
28,580
|
|
|
|
117,365
|
|
|
|
29,789
|
|
|
|
116,014
|
|
|
|
107,063
|
|
|
|
95,828
|
|
|
|
80,572
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
530,265
|
|
|
|
673,711
|
|
|
|
559,254
|
|
|
|
712,851
|
|
|
|
1,090,666
|
|
|
|
895,673
|
|
|
|
678,467
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
348,516
|
|
|
|
338,565
|
|
|
|
349,952
|
|
|
|
353,790
|
|
|
|
615,703
|
|
|
|
407,970
|
|
|
|
268,226
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
384,252
|
|
|
|
432,851
|
|
|
|
439,724
|
|
|
|
451,745
|
|
|
|
747,427
|
|
|
|
545,887
|
|
|
|
383,678
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
146,013
|
|
|
|
240,860
|
|
|
|
119,530
|
|
|
|
261,106
|
|
|
|
343,239
|
|
|
|
349,786
|
|
|
|
294,789
|
|
Book value per share(d)
|
|
$
|
8.43
|
|
|
|
12.51
|
|
|
|
7.07
|
|
|
|
13.56
|
|
|
|
86.50
|
|
|
|
88.17
|
|
|
|
74.33
|
|
16
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Margin is calculated as sales of real estate minus cost of
sales of real estate. Included in cost of sales of real estate
for the year ended December 31, 2008 is an impairment
charge associated with the Carolina Oak homebuilding project in
the amount of $3.5 million. Additionally, included in cost
of sales of real estate for the years ended December 31,
2007 and 2006 are homebuilding inventory impairment charges and
write-offs of deposits and pre-acquisition costs of
$206.4 million and $31.1 million, respectively, in
Woodbridges Primary Homebuilding segment. In
Woodbridges Tennessee Homebuilding segment, impairment
charges amounted to $11.2 million and $5.7 million in
the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively,
which were included in cost of sales. Woodbridges Primary
Homebuilding segment and Tennessee Homebuilding segment were
part of Levitt and Sons, LLC (Levitt and Sons),
Woodbridges formerly wholly-owned subsidiary which filed a
voluntary bankruptcy petition in November 2007. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share takes into account the
dilutive effect of Woodbridges stock options and
restricted stock using the treasury stock method, and the
dilution in earnings Woodbridge recognizes as a result of
outstanding Bluegreen securities that entitle the holders
thereof to acquire shares of Bluegreens common stock. |
|
(c) |
|
The weighted average number of common shares outstanding in
basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share for 2006,
2005 and 2004 were retroactively adjusted for the number of
shares representing the bonus element arising from
Woodbridges 2007 rights offering. In connection with the
rights offering, shares of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock were issued on October 1, 2007 at a purchase price
below the market price of such stock on that date, resulting in
the bonus element of 1.97%. The number of weighted average
shares of Class A Common Stock was retroactively increased
by this percentage for 2006, 2005 and 2004. |
|
(d) |
|
Book value per share is calculated as Woodbridge
shareholders equity divided by total number of shares
outstanding as of each period presented. |
|
(e) |
|
On September 26, 2008, Woodbridge effected a
one-for-five
reverse stock split, pursuant to which each five shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock then outstanding
automatically converted into one share of Class A Common
Stock, and each five shares of Woodbridges Class B
Common Stock then outstanding automatically converted into one
share of Class B Common Stock. Accordingly, all share and
per share data presented herein for prior periods have been
retroactively adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split. |
|
|
|
(f) |
|
Represents the cost of settlement and related liability which
was recognized into income during the six months ended
June 30, 2009 in connection with the March 3, 2009
consummation of the settlement agreement relating to the
bankruptcy of Levitt and Sons, as described throughout this
joint proxy statement/prospectus. |
17
Selected
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial
Information
The following selected unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial data are presented as if the merger was completed on
January 1, 2008 for income statement purposes and on
June 30, 2009 for balance sheet purposes. The following
information should be read in conjunction with the unaudited pro
forma condensed combined financial statements and related notes
and each of BFCs and Woodbridges historical
consolidated financial statements and related notes, which in
each case appear elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
The pro forma amounts set forth in the table below are presented
for illustrative purposes only. You should not rely on these pro
forma amounts as being indicative of the financial position or
results of operations that BFC would have actually realized had
the merger been completed as of the beginning of the periods
presented, nor should it be relied on as being indicative of the
future operating results or financial position of BFC following
the merger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
195,461
|
|
|
$
|
487,470
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations attributable to BFC
|
|
$
|
(12,756
|
)
|
|
$
|
(183,312
|
)
|
Net loss after dividends on preferred stock
|
|
$
|
(13,131
|
)
|
|
$
|
(184,562
|
)
|
Net loss per common share basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.05
|
)
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic and diluted
|
|
|
89,889
|
|
|
|
89,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable and held for sale, net
|
|
$
|
4,028,761
|
|
Securities
|
|
$
|
690,596
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
5,812,252
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
4,055,047
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and federal funds
purchased
|
|
$
|
25,068
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
5,476,017
|
|
BFC shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
204,572
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
$
|
120,634
|
|
Total equity
|
|
$
|
325,206
|
|
18
RISK
FACTORS
In deciding how to vote on the merger and the related
transactions and on the merger agreement, as applicable, you
should carefully consider the risks described below in addition
to the other information contained in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. The risks and uncertainties described
below are not the only ones facing BFC and Woodbridge.
Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to either
BFC or Woodbridge or that they believe are now immaterial may
also materially impact BFCs or Woodbridges results
of operations and financial condition. If any of the following
risks actually occur, the financial condition or results of
operations of BFC or Woodbridge could be materially and
adversely affected and the value of BFCs Class A
Common Stock or Class B Common Stock or Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock could decline. Shareholders of BFC and
Woodbridge should also carefully consider the risks described in
the companies respective filings with the SEC, including
the risks and uncertainties described under the heading
Risk Factors in such filings. See Where You
Can Find More Information.
Risks
Related to the Merger
The
exchange ratio set forth in the merger agreement is fixed and
will not be adjusted in the event of any change in the market
price of BFCs Class A Common Stock or
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock.
In connection with the merger, each share of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock outstanding at the effective time of
the merger (other than shares owned by BFC and holders of
Woodbridge Class A Common Stock who properly exercise and
perfect their appraisal rights) will be converted automatically
into the right to receive 3.47 shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock. The ratio at which shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock will be converted is
fixed in the merger agreement, and the merger agreement does not
provide for any adjustment for changes in the market price of
either BFCs Class A Common Stock or Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock. As a result, if the market price of
BFCs Class A Common Stock increases or decreases
between the date of the merger agreement and the effective time
of the merger, holders of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock will be entitled to receive, upon consummation of the
merger, shares having greater or lesser market value,
respectively, than they would have received based on the market
value calculated pursuant to the exchange ratio on the date of
the merger agreement.
The market price of BFCs Class A Common Stock has
fluctuated and likely will fluctuate between the date of this
joint proxy statement/prospectus and the effective time of the
merger. For example, from January 1, 2007 through
July 2, 2009, the market price of BFCs Class A
Common Stock ranged from a low of $0.06 per share to a high of
$6.90 per share, as quoted (i) on the NYSE Arca Stock
Exchange for the period prior to December 9, 2008 and
(ii) on the Pink Sheets for the period beginning on
December 9, 2008. See Comparative Stock Prices and
Dividends. Shareholders of both companies are encouraged
to obtain current market quotations for BFCs Class A
Common Stock and Woodbridges Class A Common Stock
prior to voting their shares. Further variations in the market
price of BFCs Class A Common Stock could be the
result of market assessments of the likelihood that the merger
will be consummated or the timing of the consummation of the
merger, general market and economic conditions and other factors
both within and beyond the control of BFC or Woodbridge. Because
the date that the merger may be consummated will be after the
BFC and Woodbridge shareholder meetings, at the time of the
meetings, shareholders will not know with certainty the market
value of the shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock that
holders of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock will
receive upon consummation of the merger.
If the
merger is consummated, BFCs shareholders will increase
their exposure to the real estate industry, which continues to
experience significant weakness.
If the merger is consummated, BFC will significantly increase
its exposure to the risks and uncertainties of the real estate
industry. As of December 31, 2008, BFCs investment in
Woodbridge represented 27% of BFCs total parent company
assets. If the merger is consummated, BFCs investment in
Woodbridge will represent 57% of BFCs total parent company
assets. Over the past two years, the real estate industry has
experienced significant weakness, and there may not be a full
recovery in the near term. Adverse economic
19
and other business conditions have had, and may continue to
have, a negative impact on the industry and Woodbridges
results, and no assurance can be given as to the timing or depth
of any recovery.
If the
merger is consummated, Woodbridges shareholders will be
exposed to the diverse businesses in which BFC has
invested.
Upon completion of the merger, holders of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock (other than holders who properly
exercise and perfect their appraisal rights) will become holders
of BFCs Class A Common Stock. BFC is a holding
company with investments in businesses in diverse industries,
including industries different than those in which Woodbridge
currently operates or holds investments. In addition to its
existing investment in Woodbridge, BFC holds a direct
controlling interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp, a Florida- based
financial services holding company which owns BankAtlantic, a
federally chartered, federally insured savings bank, a direct
investment in the convertible preferred stock of Benihana, which
owns Asian-themed restaurant chains in the United States, and
various real estate and venture capital investments. If the
merger is consummated, Woodbridges shareholders will not
only be subject to the risks relating to an investment in the
real estate industry and other industries in which Woodbridge
holds investment, but will also be subject to the risks of
BFCs other investments, especially in the banking
industry. BankAtlantic, like other banks, has been impacted by
the deterioration of the credit and real estate markets,
specifically in Florida, where most of its borrowers and the
real estate collateralizing its loans are located. Further, BFC
expects to continue to focus on providing overall support for
its controlled subsidiaries with a view to the improved
performance of the organization as a whole, and this business
strategy includes additional investments in its controlled
subsidiaries such as BankAtlantic Bancorp. A continued
deterioration of the banking or restaurant industries or the
other industries in which BFC has investments could have a
material adverse effect on the future market price of the shares
of BFCs Class A Common Stock that Woodbridges
shareholders would receive in the merger. For a discussion of
BFCs and Woodbridges businesses and certain factors
to consider in connection with their respective businesses, you
should carefully read and consider all of the risks set forth
herein as well as the discussion contained in the sections of
this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled BFCs
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations and Woodbridges
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations.
Dividends
or distributions from subsidiaries to the parent company may be
subject to claims in the future from creditors of the
subsidiary.
To the extent that any subsidiary makes dividend payments or
other distributions to its parent company, including payments or
distributions from Core to Woodbridge, from BankAtlantic to
BankAtlantic Bancorp or from Woodbridge or BankAtlantic Bancorp
to BFC, such payments or distributions may, in certain
circumstances, be subject at a later date to claims made by
creditors of the subsidiary which made the payment or
distribution. Any such claim, if successful, may have a material
and adverse impact on the financial condition of the parent
company against which the claim was brought.
Woodbridges
shareholders will have a reduced ownership and voting interest
in BFC after the merger than they currently have in
Woodbridge.
Woodbridges shareholders currently have the right to vote
on the election of Woodbridges directors and on other
matters affecting Woodbridge which requires shareholder
approval. Upon the completion of the merger, each Woodbridge
shareholder that receives shares of BFCs Class A
Common Stock will become a shareholder of BFC with a percentage
ownership and percentage vote in the combined organization that
is smaller than the shareholders current percentage
ownership in Woodbridge. Woodbridges shareholders will
collectively receive shares in the merger constituting
approximately 54% of the outstanding shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock following the merger. Further, in the
aggregate, BFCs Class A Common Stock represents 22%
of the total voting power of BFC, while Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock represents 53% of the total voting
power of Woodbridge. As a result, Woodbridges shareholders
will have a reduced ownership and voting interest in BFC after
the merger than they currently have in Woodbridge.
20
Whether
or not the merger is consummated, BFC and Woodbridge will have
incurred substantial costs adversely impacting their results of
operations and financial conditions and which may also adversely
impact the market price of BFCs Class A Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock and Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock.
BFC and Woodbridge have incurred and will continue to incur
substantial costs in connection with the merger. These costs are
primarily associated with the fees of their respective
attorneys, accountants and financial advisors. In addition, BFC
and Woodbridge have each diverted significant management
resources in an effort to complete the merger and each is
subject to restrictions contained in the merger agreement on the
conduct of its business during the interim period between the
date of the merger agreement and the effective time of the
merger.
Certain
executive officers and directors of BFC and Woodbridge have
financial interests in the merger that are different from, or in
addition to, the interests of BFCs and Woodbridges
shareholders, generally.
In considering the recommendation of BFCs board of
directors to vote in favor of the merger and the related
transactions and the recommendation of Woodbridges special
committee and board of directors to vote in favor of the merger
agreement, shareholders should be aware that certain directors
and executive officers of each of BFC and Woodbridge have
interests in the merger that are different from, or are in
addition to, the interests of BFCs and Woodbridges
respective shareholders, generally.
Alan B. Levan, the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
President of BFC, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Woodbridge and BankAtlantic Bancorp and Chairman of Bluegreen,
John E. Abdo, the Vice Chairman of each of BFC, Woodbridge,
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Bluegreen, and their respective
affiliates collectively beneficially own shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock
(including shares which may be acquired pursuant to the exercise
of stock options) representing approximately 74.2% of the
general voting power and approximately 37.4% of the total common
stock of BFC, and, after the completion of the merger, are
expected to beneficially own shares of BFCs Class A
Common Stock and Class B Common Stock (including shares
which may be acquired pursuant to the exercise of stock options)
representing approximately 71.0% of the general voting power and
approximately 19.0% of the total common stock of BFC.
Additionally, in connection with the merger, BFC has agreed to
cause the seven current directors of Woodbridge who are not also
directors of BFC, as well as Seth M. Wise, the President of
Woodbridge, and Jarett S. Levan, the son of Alan B. Levan and
the President of BankAtlantic Bancorp and Chief Executive
Officer and President of BankAtlantic, to be appointed to
BFCs board of directors to serve for a term expiring at
BFCs 2010 annual meeting of shareholders. Further,
Mr. Wise will serve as Executive Vice President of BFC
effective upon consummation of the merger. It is anticipated
that some or all of the directors and executive officers of
Woodbridge, including Alan B. Levan and John E. Abdo, will be
granted BFC stock options or other equity-based compensation
awards of BFC following the merger. Further, while the
Woodbridge stock options, if any, held by these individuals will
be canceled, those stock options currently have exercise prices
which are far greater than the market price of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock. It is expected that the new BFC stock
options granted to them will have exercise prices equal to the
closing market price of BFCs Class A Common Stock on
the date of grant. Additionally, following the merger,
BFCs directors and executive officers will continue to
receive compensation, including equity-based compensation, from
BFC for their services and, as permitted by the terms of
BFCs stock incentive plan, it is contemplated that
BFCs compensation committee will, following consummation
of the merger, consider BFCs outstanding stock options
with a view to re-pricing some or all of the BFC stock options
currently held by BFCs directors and executive officers or
cancelling those stock options in connection with the issuance
of new stock options having more favorable terms, including
lower exercise prices.
In considering these facts and the other information contained
in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, you should be aware of
these interests. Please see the section of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus entitled The Merger
Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger for further
information about these interests.
21
The
Woodbridge special committee did not conduct an auction with
respect to the sale of Woodbridge.
Because BFCs voting control of Woodbridge gives BFC the
ability to veto any sale of Woodbridge to a third party if it so
chooses, and based on BFCs expressed intention to maintain
a long-term relationship with Woodbridge, the Woodbridge special
committee did not conduct a market check or auction process with
respect to the possible sale of Woodbridge. Such a process may
have resulted in different terms for Woodbridges
shareholders, and there is no assurance that merger
consideration having a higher value would not have been received
if Woodbridge had been in a position to conduct a market check
or auction. However, the merger agreement provides Woodbridge
with the right to furnish information about its business to any
person making an unsolicited superior proposal to the merger and
participate in discussions or negotiations regarding, and, in
specific circumstances, to accept, such proposal in lieu of the
merger. See The Merger Agreement Superior
Proposal.
The
merger agreement limits the ability of Woodbridge and BFC to
pursue an alternative transaction proposal to the merger, and
BFCs existing control position in Woodbridge further
limits Woodbridges ability to consummate any such
alternative transaction.
Subject to certain exceptions, the merger agreement prohibits
each of Woodbridge and BFC from soliciting, initiating,
encouraging or otherwise facilitating certain alternative
transaction proposals with any third party, which may have the
effect of limiting each companys ability to pursue offers
from third parties that could result in greater value to its
shareholders relative to the terms and conditions of the merger
agreement. See The Merger Agreement No
Solicitation.
Further, BFCs existing ownership of all of the shares of
Woodbridges Class B Common Stock provides BFC with
the ability to veto any alternative transaction. Moreover, while
a competing acquiror could deliver a bona fide competing
acquisition proposal in a manner that would enable Woodbridge to
negotiate the terms of the competing offer, BFCs control
position and ability to veto an alternative transaction limits
the likelihood that any potential competing acquiror will come
forward. Further, if the merger agreement is terminated and the
board of directors of Woodbridge determines to seek another
merger or business combination, it may not be able to find a
partner willing to provide an equivalent or more attractive
benefit to Woodbridges shareholders than that which would
have been received by such shareholders pursuant to the merger
agreement. Even if such a partner were found, there is no
assurance that BFC will approve any such merger or business
combination.
If
significant numbers of holders of Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock exercise their appraisal rights, it could have an
adverse effect on the companies.
If holders of more than 10% of the outstanding shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock exercise, or,
immediately prior to the effective time of the merger, remain
entitled to exercise, their appraisal rights, BFC may elect not
to consummate the merger, and, in that event, BFC and Woodbridge
will have incurred significant transaction costs without
consummating the transaction. Even if the merger is consummated,
the number of shareholders exercising appraisal rights will
impact BFCs cash balances and cash flow as BFC will be
required to pay such shareholders in cash. Further, BFC has the
right to waive the condition to consummating the merger
described above and close the merger even if the holders of 10%
or more of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock exercise or
remain entitled to exercise their appraisal rights, which would
increase the amount of cash that BFC would have to pay in
consideration of appraisal rights. BFC itself has no operations
other than activities relating to the monitoring and support of
its existing investments and identifying, analyzing and, in
appropriate cases, acquiring new investments. Since BFC is
dependent upon dividends from its subsidiaries for a significant
portion of its cash flow, and since the declaration of dividends
by BFCs subsidiaries is generally not within BFCs
control, any significant decrease in BFCs cash position as
a result of payments to shareholders who exercise their
appraisal rights could limit BFCs ability to support
Woodbridges business with additional capital and could
have a material adverse effect on BFCs and
Woodbridges businesses.
22
Substantial
sales of BFCs Class A Common Stock could adversely
affect its market price.
It is anticipated that approximately 44.8 million shares of
BFCs Class A Common Stock will be issued in
connection with the merger. The shares issuable in connection
with the merger would represent approximately 54% of the total
number of shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock
outstanding after the merger. Other than the shares issued to
affiliates of Woodbridge or BFC, which would represent
approximately 13% of the total number of shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock outstanding after the merger, the
shares issued in connection with the merger will not be subject
to restrictions on resale. The issuance and potential resale of
these new shares could have the effect of depressing the market
price of BFCs Class A Common Stock. During the
quarter ended June 30, 2009, the average daily trading
volume of BFCs Class A Common Stock was approximately
44,000 shares. In addition, although BFC has in place a
share repurchase program and may in the future increase the
number of shares which may be repurchased under the program, the
level of shares which BFC may repurchase in the future is
dependent on a variety of factors, including, among other
factors, the price of BFCs Class A Common Stock,
prevailing market conditions, BFCs financial condition and
available resources, and other investment alternatives. There is
no assurance that BFC will repurchase any shares in the future
or that, if BFC does decide to repurchase shares, that such
repurchases will have a favorable impact on the market price of
BFCs Class A Common Stock.
The
board of directors of BFC and Woodbridge may choose to waive any
conditions to consummation of the merger and proceed to
consummate the transaction.
The merger agreement contains conditions precedent to the
obligations of the parties to consummate the merger. The merger
agreement also provides that these conditions precedent may be
waived, in whole or in part, and the merger consummated
notwithstanding that a condition precedent has not been
fulfilled or satisfied and notwithstanding that the waiver of
the condition may directly or indirectly impact the financial
condition of the combined company. The determination to waive
the fulfillment of a condition will be made by the board of
directors of the company waiving the condition. No additional
vote of the shareholders will be required in connection with the
waiver of a condition precedent.
There
are limitations on the amount of shares of BFCs common
stock that an individual or company can own without obtaining
regulatory approval.
As a unitary savings bank holding company, BFC is subject to
regulation by the OTS. Among other things, ownership of
control of BFC is subject to applicable OTS
regulations. Under the applicable regulations of the OTS, if,
after giving effect to the number of shares of BFCs common
stock a shareholder of Woodbridge receives in the merger, that
shareholder, directly or indirectly, or through one or more
subsidiaries, or acting in concert with one or more other
persons or entities, owns (i) more than 10% of BFCs
common stock and one or more specified control factors exist,
then the shareholder will be determined, subject to the right of
rebuttal, to have acquired control of BFC or (ii) more than
25% of BFCs common stock, then the shareholder will be
conclusively determined to have acquired control of BFC,
regardless of whether any control factors exist. Accordingly,
subject to certain limited exceptions, any Woodbridge
shareholder who receives shares in the merger which causes its
ownership of BFCs common stock to exceed such thresholds
will be required to file an application, notice or rebuttal with
the OTS. Pending favorable action by the OTS on such
application, notice or rebuttal, the shareholders actions
with respect to BFC will be limited as set forth in the
applicable regulation. If the OTS disapproves of the
application, notice or rebuttal, then the shareholder will be
required to divest such portion of its shares of BFCs
common stock necessary to cause its ownership to fall below the
applicable regulatory threshold. Woodbridges shareholders
should consult with their legal counsel regarding any regulatory
limitations on their ownership of BFCs common stock that
may be applicable to them, including whether they are required
to submit an application, notice or rebuttal to the OTS relating
to their share ownership.
23
There
is no assurance as to the value holders of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock will receive if they choose to
exercise their appraisal rights.
Under the FBCA, holders of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock are entitled to appraisal rights in connection with the
merger. If a holder of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock exercises his, her or its appraisal rights and follows the
relevant procedures specified in the FBCA, summarized in
The Merger Appraisal Rights, he, she or
it will have the right to receive a cash payment equal to the
fair value of his, her or its stock. The express procedures of
the FBCA must be followed and, if they are not, shareholders
wishing to exercise their appraisal rights may lose such rights.
Moreover, pursuant to the FBCA, the fair value of the shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock held by a
shareholder exercising appraisal rights means the value of such
shares calculated as of the time immediately preceding the
consummation of the merger, excluding any appreciation or
depreciation in anticipation of the merger, which could be more
than, less than or equal to the value of the shares of
BFCs Class A Common Stock that the shareholder would
otherwise have received in connection with the merger. Further,
the fair value cash payment could potentially be determined in
judicial proceedings, the result of which cannot be predicted.
Accordingly, there can be no assurance that holders of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock exercising appraisal
rights will receive consideration equal to or greater than the
value of the shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock
which they would have received in connection with the merger.
BFCs
historic net operating loss carryforwards may be severely
limited as a result of the merger.
BFC has experienced and continues to experience net operating
losses. Under the Code, BFC may utilize its net operating loss
carryforwards in certain circumstances to offset future taxable
income and to reduce federal income tax liability, subject to
certain requirements and restrictions. Based on the
determination that it is more likely than not that BFC will not
generate sufficient income to be in a position to realize its
deferred tax asset, a full valuation allowance against the
deferred tax assets related to BFCs operating losses has
been recorded. There is no assurance that BFC will generate
sufficient income to be able to utilize its net operating loss
carryforwards in the future.
BFCs ability to use its net operating loss carryforwards
could be substantially limited if BFC experiences an
ownership change, as defined in Section 382 of
the Code. BFC believes that the merger, if consummated, will
likely result in an ownership change with respect to
BFC and, accordingly, will limit BFCs ability in the
future to utilize its historic net operating loss carryforwards.
However, although there are no assurances, BFC believes that the
merger, if consummated, will not result in any material
limitations under Section 382 of the Code with respect to
the utilization of Woodbridges historic net operating
losses if there is sufficient income generated by the combined
company.
The
Internal Revenue Service may disagree with the parties
description of the federal income tax consequences of the
merger.
Although BFC and Woodbridge will receive an opinion of legal
counsel as to the anticipated federal income tax consequences of
the merger, neither BFC nor Woodbridge has applied for, or
expects to obtain, a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service
with respect to the federal income tax consequences of the
merger. No assurance can be given that the Internal Revenue
Service will agree with the positions taken in the legal opinion
or will not challenge the income tax consequences of the merger.
Risks
Related to BFC and its Business
BFC
has in the past incurred cash flow deficits that it expects will
continue in the future.
BFC is a holding company engaged in making investments in
operating businesses, and has no revenue generating operating
activities. Accordingly, BFC has in the past incurred cash flow
deficits at its parent company level and expects to continue to
do so in the foreseeable future. BFC incurred operating and
investing cash flow deficits at its parent company level of
$5.5 million and $2.5 million, respectively, during
the year ended December 31, 2008 and a $3.0 million
operating cash flow deficit at its parent company level during
the six months ended June 30, 2009. BFC has financed these
operating cash flow deficits with available
24
working capital. At June 30, 2009, BFCs cash and cash
equivalents balance at its parent company level was
approximately $5.9 million. Since BFCs business
strategy involves primarily holding long-term investments and
neither BankAtlantic Bancorp nor Woodbridge is expected to
declare dividends to its common shareholders in 2009, BFCs
investments are not expected to generate cash flow to BFC in the
near term. As a result, if cash flow is not sufficient to
fund BFCs operating expenses in the future, BFC may
be forced to reduce operating expenses, to liquidate some of its
investments or to seek to fund the expenses from the proceeds of
additional equity or debt financing. There is no assurance that
any such financing would be available on commercially reasonable
terms, if at all, or that BFC would not be forced to liquidate
its investments at depressed prices.
Adverse
conditions and events where BFCs investments are currently
concentrated could continue to adversely impact BFCs
results and future growth.
BankAtlantic Bancorps business, the location of
BankAtlantics branches and the real estate collateralizing
its commercial real estate loans are concentrated in Florida.
Further, Woodbridges operations are concentrated in
Florida and South Carolina. Economic conditions generally, and
the economies of both Florida and South Carolina in particular,
have adversely impacted the results and prospects of
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge. Further each of the states
is subject to the risks of natural disasters, such as tropical
storms and hurricanes. The continued impact of the economic
downturn, natural disaster or adverse changes in laws or
regulations applicable to the companies could impact the credit
quality of BankAtlantics assets, the desirability of
Woodbridges properties, the financial performance of
Woodbridges and BankAtlantics customers and the
overall success of Woodbridge and BankAtlantic.
Regulatory
restrictions, bank performance and the terms of indebtedness
limit or restrict BankAtlantic Bancorps ability to pay
dividends, which may impact BFCs cash flow.
BFC holds approximately 30% of the outstanding common stock of
BankAtlantic Bancorp. Dividends by BankAtlantic Bancorp are
subject to a number of conditions, including the cash flow and
profitability of BankAtlantic Bancorp, declaration of dividends
by BankAtlantic Bancorps board of directors, compliance
with the terms of outstanding indebtedness, and regulatory
restrictions applicable to BankAtlantic. During 2008, BFC
received $208,000 in dividends from BankAtlantic Bancorp.
BankAtlantic Bancorp is a separate publicly traded company whose
board of directors includes a majority of independent directors
as required by the listing standards of the New York Stock
Exchange. Decisions made by BankAtlantic Bancorps board
are not within BFCs control and may not be made in our
best interests.
BankAtlantic Bancorp is not currently paying dividends and has
indicated that it does not anticipate doing so for the
foreseeable future. The declaration and payment of dividends and
the ability of BankAtlantic Bancorp to meet its debt service
obligations will depend upon adequate cash holdings, which are
driven by the results of operations, financial condition and
cash requirements of BankAtlantic Bancorp, and the ability of
BankAtlantic to pay dividends to BankAtlantic Bancorp. The
ability of BankAtlantic to pay dividends or make other
distributions to BankAtlantic Bancorp is subject to regulations
and OTS approval and is based upon BankAtlantics
regulatory capital levels and net income. Due to
BankAtlantics recent net losses, BankAtlantic suspended
dividends to BankAtlantic Bancorp. In February 2009,
BankAtlantic Bancorp elected to exercise its right to defer
payments of interest on its trust preferred junior subordinated
debt. BankAtlantic Bancorp is permitted to defer quarterly
interest payments for up to 20 consecutive quarters. During the
deferral period, which BankAtlantic Bancorp can end at any time,
BankAtlantic Bancorp will not pay dividends to its common
shareholders, including BFC. Accordingly, BFC does not expect to
receive dividends from BankAtlantic Bancorp during 2009.
BFCs
activities and its subsidiaries activities are subject to
a wide range of regulatory requirements that could have a
material adverse effect on BFCs business.
BFC and BankAtlantic Bancorp are each grandfathered unitary
savings and loan holding companies and have broad authority to
engage in various types of business activities. However, the OTS
can stop each of BFC and BankAtlantic Bancorp from engaging in
activities or limit those activities if it determines that there
is
25
reasonable cause to believe that the continuation of any
particular activity constitutes a serious risk to the financial
safety, soundness or stability of BankAtlantic. The OTS may also:
|
|
|
|
|
limit transactions between BFC, BankAtlantic, BankAtlantic
Bancorp and the subsidiaries or affiliates of either;
|
|
|
|
limit the activities of BankAtlantic, BankAtlantic Bancorp or
BFC; or
|
|
|
|
impose capital requirements on BFC or BankAtlantic Bancorp.
|
In addition, unlike bank holding companies, as unitary savings
and loan holding companies, BFC and BankAtlantic Bancorp are not
currently subject to capital requirements. However, the OTS has
indicated that it may in the future impose capital requirements
on savings and loan holding companies. The OTS may also in the
future adopt regulations that would affect BankAtlantic
Bancorps operations, including BankAtlantic Bancorps
ability to pay dividends or to engage in certain transactions or
activities.
Certain
members of BFCs board of directors and certain of
BFCs executive officers are also directors and executive
officers of BFCs affiliates.
Alan B. Levan, BFCs Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
President, and John E. Abdo, BFCs Vice Chairman, are also
members of the boards of directors
and/or
executive officers of BankAtlantic Bancorp, BankAtlantic,
Woodbridge, Bluegreen and Benihana and receive, and following
the merger will continue to receive, compensation, including
equity-based compensation, in each of those capacities. Neither
Mr. Levan nor Mr. Abdo is obligated to allocate a
specific amount of time to the management of BFC, and they may
devote more time and attention to the operations of BFCs
affiliates than they devote directly to BFCs activities.
Additionally, D. Keith Cobb, a member of BFCs board of
directors is a member of the board of directors of BankAtlantic
Bancorp and BankAtlantic.
BFCs
investment in Benihana subjects it to the risks associated with
the restaurant industry.
BFC has an investment in shares of Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock of Benihana which are convertible into shares of
Benihanas Common Stock. As such, the value of BFCs
investment will be influenced by the market performance of
Benihanas Common Stock. Some of the risk factors common to
the restaurant industry which might affect the performance of
Benihana are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions, and the disruptions in the
financial markets which have adversely impacted consumer
spending patterns and the availability and cost of credit may
continue to impact Benihana or deteriorate further;
|
|
|
|
the failure of existing or new restaurants to perform as
expected;
|
|
|
|
the inability to construct new restaurants and remodel existing
restaurants within projected budgets and time periods;
|
|
|
|
increases in the minimum wage;
|
|
|
|
intense competition in the restaurant industry;
|
|
|
|
the food service industry is affected by litigation and
publicity concerning food quality, health and other issues which
could cause customers to avoid a particular restaurant, result
in significant liabilities or litigation costs or damage
reputation or brand recognition; and
|
|
|
|
implementing growth and renovation strategies may strain
available resources.
|
BFC
and its subsidiaries may issue additional securities in the
future.
There is generally no restriction on BFCs ability to issue
debt or equity securities which are pari passu or have a
preference over its Class A Common Stock. Authorized but
unissued shares of BFCs capital stock are available for
issuance from time to time at the discretion of BFCs board
of directors, including issuances in connection with
acquisitions. Likewise, there is also no restriction on the
ability of BankAtlantic Bancorp or Woodbridge to issue equity or
debt securities or incur additional indebtedness either at the
parent company level or at a subsidiary level. Any such
issuances would partially dilute BFCs ownership position
in those entities.
26
BFCs
portfolio of equity securities and its investments in
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge subjects BFC to equity
pricing risks.
Because BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge are consolidated in
BFCs financial statements, the decline in the market price
of their stock would not impact BFCs consolidated
financial statements. However, the continued decline in the
market price of either of these securities would likely have an
effect on the market price of BFCs common stock, and the
market price of BFCs common stock and directly held equity
securities are important to the valuation and financing
capability of BFC.
Also, BFC has an investment in 800,000 shares of
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of Benihana for which
no current market is available (unless converted into shares of
Benihanas Common Stock). The shares of Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock owned by BFC are convertible into an
aggregate of 1,578,943 shares of Benihanas Common
Stock. At June 30 2009, if converted, the aggregate market
value of such shares would have been approximately
$11.1 million.
The ability to realize or liquidate these investments will
depend on future market and economic conditions and the ability
to register the shares of Benihanas Common Stock in the
event of the conversion of the shares of the Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock of Benihana which BFC owns, all of
which are subject to significant risk.
BFCs
control position may adversely affect the market price of
BankAtlantic Bancorps and Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock.
As of June 30, 2009, BFC owned all of BankAtlantic
Bancorps issued and outstanding Class B Common Stock
and 2,389,697 shares, or approximately 23%, of BankAtlantic
Bancorps issued and outstanding Class A Common Stock,
and BFC owned all of Woodbridges issued and outstanding
Class B Common Stock and 3,735,392 shares, or
approximately 22% of, Woodbridges issued and outstanding
Class A Common Stock. BFCs share holdings represent
approximately 59% of the total voting power of each of
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge. Since the Class A
Common Stock and Class B Common Stock of each of
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge vote as a single group on
most matters, BFC is in a position to control BankAtlantic
Bancorp and Woodbridge and elect BankAtlantic Bancorps and
Woodbridges boards of directors. As a consequence, BFC has
the voting power to significantly influence the outcome of any
shareholder vote of BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge, except
in those limited circumstances where Florida law mandates
separate class votes. BFCs control position may have an
adverse effect on the market prices of BankAtlantic
Bancorps and Woodbridges Class A Common Stock.
Alan
B. Levan and John E. Abdos control position may adversely
affect the market price of BFCs common
stock.
Alan B. Levan, BFCs Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
President, and John E. Abdo, BFCs Vice Chairman, and their
respective affiliates collectively beneficially own
approximately 37% of the outstanding shares of BFCs total
common stock, representing approximately 74% of BFCs total
voting power. Additionally, Messrs. Levan and Abdo have
agreed to vote their shares of BFCs Class B Common
Stock in favor of the election of the other to BFCs board
of directors for so long as they are willing and able to serve
as directors of BFC. Further, Mr. Abdo has agreed, subject
to certain exceptions, not to transfer certain of his shares of
BFC Class B Common Stock and to obtain the consent of
Mr. Levan prior to the conversion of certain of his shares
of BFCs Class B Common Stock into shares of
BFCs Class A Common Stock. Since BFCs
Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock vote as
a single class on most matters, Messrs. Levan and Abdo
effectively have the voting power to control the outcome of any
shareholder vote and elect the members of BFCs board of
directors. Messrs. Levans and Abdos control
position may have an adverse effect on the market price of
BFCs common stock, except in those limited circumstances
where Florida law mandates that the holders of BFCs
Class A Common Stock vote as a separate class.
Messrs. Levans and Abdos interests may conflict
with the interests of BFCs other shareholders.
27
The
terms of BFCs Articles of Incorporation, which establish
fixed relative voting percentages between BFCs
Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock, may not
be well accepted by the market.
BFCs Class A Common Stock and Class B Common
Stock generally vote together as a single class. The
Class A Common Stock possesses in the aggregate 22% of the
total voting power of all of BFCs common stock, and the
Class B Common Stock possesses in the aggregate the
remaining 78% of the total voting power. These relative voting
percentages will remain fixed unless the number of shares of
Class B Common Stock outstanding decreases to
1,800,000 shares, at which time the Class A Common
Stocks aggregate voting power will change to 40% and the
Class B Common Stock will have the remaining 60%. If the
number of shares of Class B Common Stock outstanding
decreases to 1,400,000 shares, the Class A Common
Stocks aggregate voting power will change to 53% and the
Class B Common Stock will have the remaining 47%. These
relative voting percentages will remain fixed unless the number
of shares of Class B Common Stock outstanding decreases to
500,000 shares, at which time the fixed voting percentages
will be eliminated. These changes in the relative voting power
represented by each class of BFCs common stock are based
only on the number of shares of Class B Common Stock
outstanding; thus issuances of Class A Common Stock,
including Class A Common Stock issued in the merger, will
have no effect on these provisions, and the issuance of
Class A Common Stock will widen the disparity between the
equity interest and voting power of the Class B Common
Stock. While this capital structure was approved by BFCs
shareholders, the fixed voting percentage provisions are
somewhat unique. If the market does not sufficiently accept this
structure, the trading price and market for BFCs
Class A Common Stock would be adversely affected.
Risks
Related to Woodbridge and its Business
Through
Core Communities and Carolina Oak, Woodbridge engages in real
estate activities which are speculative and involve a high
degree of risk.
The real estate industry is highly cyclical by nature. The
current market is experiencing a significant decline, and future
market conditions are uncertain. There are many factors which
affect the real estate industry, and many of these factors are
beyond Woodbridges control, including:
|
|
|
|
|
overbuilding or decreases in demand to acquire land;
|
|
|
|
the availability and cost of financing;
|
|
|
|
unfavorable interest rates and increases in inflation;
|
|
|
|
changes in national, regional and local economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
cost overruns, inclement weather, and labor and material
shortages;
|
|
|
|
the impact of present or future environmental legislation,
zoning laws and other regulations;
|
|
|
|
availability, delays and costs associated with obtaining
permits, approvals or licenses necessary to develop
property; and
|
|
|
|
increases in real estate taxes, insurance and other local
government fees.
|
The
real estate market has experienced a significant downturn, and
the duration and ultimate severity of the downturn is uncertain.
A continued deterioration of economic conditions will adversely
affect Woodbridges operating results and financial
condition.
The downturn in the real estate market, which is now in its
fourth year, has become one of the most severe in
U.S. history. This downturn, which resulted from a decline
in consumer confidence, decline in real estate prices and an
oversupply of real estate available for sale, has been
exacerbated by, among other things, a decline in the overall
economy, increasing unemployment, fear of job loss and a decline
in the securities and credit markets. The governments
legislative and administrative measures aimed at restoring
liquidity to the credit markets and improving conditions in the
real estate markets has only recently begun and there is no
indication yet whether these measures have or will effectively
stabilize prices and real estate values or restore consumer
confidence and increase demand in the real estate markets.
28
As a result of this downturn, and specifically the adverse
impact that the combination of the lower demand and higher
inventories has had on the amount of land that Woodbridge is
able to develop and sell and the prices at which it is able to
sell the land, Woodbridges operating results and financial
condition have been adversely affected. Woodbridge cannot
predict the duration or ultimate severity of the current
challenging conditions, nor can it provide assurance that its
responses to the current downturn or the governments
attempts to address the troubles in the economy will be
successful. If these conditions persist or continue to worsen,
they will further adversely affect Woodbridges operating
results and financial condition.
Because
real estate investments are illiquid, the downturn in the real
estate market and in the economy in general has had, and may
continue to have, an adverse impact on Woodbridges
business and cash flow.
Real estate investments are generally illiquid. Like other
companies that invest in real estate, Woodbridge has a limited
ability to vary its portfolio of real estate investments in
response to changes in economic and other conditions. In
addition, as a result of the sustained downturn in the real
estate market, and in the economy in general, the estimated
market value of Woodbridges real estate properties has
decreased and may continue to decrease in the future. Moreover,
Woodbridge may not be able to timely dispose of properties when
it finds dispositions advantageous or necessary, or complete the
disposition of properties under contract to be sold, and any
such dispositions may not provide proceeds in excess of the
amount of its investment in the property or even in excess of
the amount of any indebtedness secured by the property. As a
result, Woodbridge is susceptible to the risks associated with
further declines in real estate values, including the risk that
it may be required to record additional impairment write-downs
with respect to its real estate inventory in the future if the
current real estate environment does not improve or if the
market value of its real estate properties otherwise continues
to decline. Woodbridge had $243.6 million of real estate
inventory at June 30, 2009.
The
commercial real estate market has been adversely affected by the
current economic and credit environment.
Economic conditions may make it more difficult to achieve
projected rental and occupancy rates on Cores commercial
leasing projects, which may adversely impact the net operating
income of the projects. The risks relating to Cores
commercial leasing projects include, without limitation:
|
|
|
|
|
the risk that a significant tenant or a number of tenants may
file for bankruptcy protection, creating the possibility that
past due rents may never be recovered;
|
|
|
|
the risk that leases with certain existing tenants may become
overly burdensome to the lessee due to reduced business
activity, and lease concessions and modifications may be
necessary to avoid defaults;
|
|
|
|
the risk that the current adverse economic conditions and
limited availability of credit may continue or deteriorate
further, causing market capitalization rates on commercial
properties to increase beyond present levels, thus reducing the
value at which commercial projects can be sold;
|
|
|
|
the risk that net operating income at the commercial leasing
projects may not be sufficient to meet certain debt service
coverage ratio requirements, which would result in requirements
for additional principal curtailment payments in order to bring
the loans into compliance; and
|
|
|
|
the risk that vacant space will take longer to lease and that
rental rates will be lower than projected or necessary to
operate the project profitably.
|
Commercial
leasing projects may not yield anticipated returns, which could
harm Woodbridges operating results, reduce its cash flow
and/or adversely impair its ability to sell commercial
assets.
A component of Woodbridges business strategy is the
development of commercial properties and assets for sale. These
developments may not be as successful as expected due to the
commercial leasing related risks discussed herein, as well as
the risks associated with real estate development generally.
29
Additionally, development of commercial projects involves the
risk associated with the significant time lag between
commencement and completion of the project. This time lag
subjects Woodbridge to greater risks relating to fluctuations in
the general economy, its ability to obtain construction or
permanent financing on favorable terms, if at all, its ability
to achieve projected rental rates, the pace that it will be able
to lease new tenants, higher than estimated construction costs
(including labor and material costs), and delays in the
completion of projects because of, among other factors,
inclement weather, labor disruptions, construction delays or
delays in receiving zoning or other regulatory approvals, or
man-made or natural disasters.
Woodbridge
utilizes community development district and special assessment
district bonds to fund development costs and will be responsible
for assessments until the underlying property is
sold.
Woodbridge establishes community development district and
special assessment district bonds to access tax-exempt bond
financing to fund infrastructure development at Cores
master-planned communities. Woodbridge is responsible for any
assessed amounts until the underlying property is sold.
Accordingly, to the extent Woodbridge continues to hold certain
of its properties longer than originally projected (as a result
of a continued downturn in the real estate markets or
otherwise), it will be required to pay a higher portion of
annual assessments on such properties. In addition, Woodbridge
could be required to pay down a portion of the bonds in the
event its entitlements were to decrease as to the number of
residential units
and/or
commercial space that can be built on the properties encumbered
by the bonds. Moreover, Core has guaranteed payments for
assessments under the district bonds in Tradition, Florida which
would require funding if future assessments to be allocated to
property owners are insufficient to repay the bonds.
The availability of tax-exempt bond financing to fund
infrastructure development at Cores master-planned
communities may be adversely impacted by recent disruptions in
credit markets, including the municipal bond market, by general
economic conditions and by fluctuations in the real estate
market. If Woodbridge is not able to access this type of
financing, it would be forced to obtain substitute financing,
and there is no assurance that it would be able to obtain
substitute financing on acceptable terms, if at all. If
Woodbridge is not able to obtain financing for infrastructure
development, Core would be forced to use its own funds or delay
development activity at its master-planned communities.
Cores
results are subject to significant volatility.
Due to the nature and size of Cores individual land
transactions, Cores results and Woodbridges
consolidated results have historically been subject to
significant volatility. Land sale revenues have been sporadic
and have fluctuated dramatically based upon, among other
factors, changing sales prices and costs attributable to the
land sold. Due to the current downturn in the real estate
market, margins on land sales may continue to decline and there
is no assurance that they will return to prior levels. If the
real estate markets deteriorate further or if the current
downturn is prolonged, Woodbridge may not be able to sell land
at prices above its carrying cost or even in amounts necessary
to repay its indebtedness. In addition to the impact of economic
and market factors, the sales price and margin of land sold
varies depending upon: the location; the parcel size; whether
the parcel is sold as raw land, partially developed land or
individually developed lots; the degree to which the land is
entitled; and whether the designated use of land is residential
or commercial.
In addition, Cores ability to realize margins may be
affected by circumstances beyond its control, including:
|
|
|
|
|
shortages or increases in prices of construction materials;
|
|
|
|
natural disasters in the areas in which it operates;
|
|
|
|
lack of availability of adequate utility infrastructure and
services; and
|
|
|
|
its need to rely on local subcontractors who may not be
adequately capitalized or insured.
|
Any of these circumstances could give rise to delays in the
start or completion of development at, or increase the cost of
developing, Cores master-planned communities. Woodbridge
competes with other real estate developers, both regionally and
nationally, for labor as well as raw materials, and the
competition for
30
materials has recently become global. Increased costs in labor
and materials could cause increases in construction costs. In
addition, the cost of sales of real estate is dependent upon the
original cost of the land acquired, the timing of the
acquisition of the land, and the amount of land development,
interest and real estate tax costs capitalized to the particular
land parcel during active development. Future margins will
continue to vary based on these and other market factors.
Woodbridge
is dependent upon certain key tenants in its commercial
developments, and decisions made by these tenants or adverse
developments in the business of these tenants could have a
negative impact on Woodbridges financial
condition.
Woodbridges commercial real estate centers are supported
by anchor tenants which, due to size, reputation or other
factors, are particularly responsible for drawing other tenants
and shoppers to the centers in certain cases. Woodbridge is
subject to the risk that certain of these anchor tenants may be
unable to make their lease payments or may decline to extend a
lease upon its expiration.
In addition, an anchor tenant may decide that a particular store
is unprofitable and close its operations and, while the anchor
tenant may continue to make rental payments, its failure to
occupy its premises could have an adverse effect on the
property. A lease termination by an anchor tenant or a failure
by that anchor tenant to occupy the premises could result in
lease terminations or reductions in rent by other tenants in the
same shopping center. Vacated anchor tenant space also tends to
adversely affect the entire shopping center because of the loss
of the departed anchor tenants power to draw customers to
the center. Woodbridge may not be able to quickly re-lease
vacant space on favorable terms, if at all. Any of these
developments could adversely affect Woodbridges financial
condition or results of operations.
It may
be difficult and costly to rent vacant space and space which may
become vacant in future periods.
Woodbridges goal is to improve the performance of its
properties by leasing available space and re-leasing vacated
space. However, Woodbridge may not be able to maintain its
overall occupancy levels. Woodbridges ability to continue
to lease or re-lease vacant space in its commercial properties
will be affected by many factors, including its properties
locations, current market conditions and the provisions of the
leases Woodbridge enters into with the tenants at its
properties. In fact, many of the factors which could cause
Woodbridges current tenants to vacate their space could
also make it more difficult for Woodbridge to re-lease that
space. The failure to lease or to re-lease vacant space on
satisfactory terms could harm Woodbridges operating
results.
If Woodbridge is able to re-lease vacated space, there is no
assurance that rental rates will be equal to or in excess of
current rental rates. In addition, Woodbridge may incur
substantial costs in obtaining new tenants, including brokerage
commission fees paid by Woodbridge in connection with new leases
or lease renewals, and the cost of leasehold improvements.
Additional
adverse changes in economic conditions where Woodbridge conducts
its real estate operations could further reduce the demand for
real estate and, as a result, could further adversely impact
Woodbridges results of operations and financial
condition.
Adverse changes in national, regional and local economic
conditions, especially in Florida and to a lesser extent South
Carolina where Woodbridges operations are concentrated,
have had and may continue to have a negative impact on its
business. Continued adverse changes in, among other things,
employment levels, job growth, consumer confidence, interest
rates and population growth, or a continued oversupply of land
for sale may further reduce demand and depress real estate
prices, which, in turn, could adversely impact Woodbridges
results of operations and financial condition.
If
prospective purchasers of Woodbridges inventory or
Woodbridges tenants are not able to obtain suitable
financing, Woodbridges results of operations may further
decline.
Woodbridges results of operations are dependent in part on
the ability of prospective purchasers of its real estate
inventory and prospective commercial tenants to secure
financing. The recent deterioration of the
31
credit markets and the related tightening of credit standards
may impact the ability of prospective purchasers and tenants to
secure financing on acceptable terms, if at all. This may, in
turn, negatively impact land sales and long-term rental and
occupancy rates as well as the value of Cores commercial
properties.
Natural
disasters could have an adverse effect on Woodbridges real
estate operations.
The Florida and South Carolina markets in which Woodbridge
operates are subject to the risks of natural disasters such as
hurricanes and tropical storms. These natural disasters could
have a material adverse effect on Woodbridges business by
causing the incurrence of uninsured losses, increased insurance
rates, including homebuyer insurance rates, delays in
construction, and shortages and increased costs of labor and
building materials.
In addition to property damage, hurricanes may cause disruptions
to Woodbridges business operations. Approaching storms may
require that operations be suspended in favor of storm
preparation activities. After a storm has passed,
construction-related resources such as
sub-contracted
labor and building materials are likely to be redeployed to
hurricane recovery efforts. Governmental permitting and
inspection activities may similarly be focused primarily on
returning displaced residents to homes damaged by the storms
rather than on new construction activity. Depending on the
severity of the damage caused by the storms, disruptions such as
these could last for several months.
A
portion of Woodbridges revenues from land sales in
Cores master-planned communities are recognized for
accounting purposes under the percentage of completion method
and, therefore, Woodbridges margins may be adversely
impacted if Woodbridges actual results differ from its
assumptions.
Under the percentage of completion method of accounting for
recognizing revenue, Woodbridge records revenue and cost of
sales as work on the project progresses based on the percentage
of actual work incurred compared to the total estimated costs.
This method relies on estimates of total expected project costs.
Revenue and cost estimates are reviewed and revised periodically
as the work progresses. Adjustments are reflected in sales of
real estate and cost of sales in the period when such estimates
are revised. Variation of actual results compared to
Woodbridges estimated costs in Cores master-planned
communities could cause material changes to our net margins.
Product
liability litigation and claims that arise in the ordinary
course of business may be costly.
The commercial real estate development business is subject to
construction defect and product liability claims arising in the
ordinary course of business. These claims are common in the
commercial real estate industries and can be costly. Woodbridge
has, and many of its subcontractors have, general liability,
property, errors and omissions, workers compensation and other
business insurance. However, these insurance policies only
protect Woodbridge against a portion of its risk of loss from
claims. In addition, because of the uncertainties inherent in
these matters, Woodbridge cannot provide reasonable assurance
that its insurance coverage or its subcontractor arrangements
will be adequate to address all warranty, construction defect
and liability claims in the future. In addition, the costs of
insuring against construction defect and product liability
claims, if applicable, are substantial and the amount of
coverage offered by insurance companies is also currently
limited. There can be no assurance that this coverage will not
be further restricted and become more costly. If Woodbridge is
not able to obtain adequate insurance against these claims,
Woodbridge may experience losses that could negatively impact
its operating results.
Woodbridge
is subject to governmental regulations that may limit its
operations, increase its expenses or subject it to
liability.
Woodbridge is subject to laws, ordinances and regulations of
various federal, state and local governmental entities and
agencies concerning, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
environmental matters, including the presence of hazardous or
toxic substances;
|
|
|
|
wetland preservation;
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
health and safety;
|
|
|
|
zoning, land use and other entitlements;
|
|
|
|
building design; and
|
|
|
|
density levels.
|
In developing a project and building commercial properties,
Woodbridge may be required to obtain the approval of numerous
governmental authorities regulating matters such as:
|
|
|
|
|
the installation of utility services such as gas, electric,
water and waste disposal;
|
|
|
|
the dedication of acreage for open space, parks and schools;
|
|
|
|
permitted land uses; and
|
|
|
|
the construction design, methods and materials used.
|
These laws or regulations could, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
establish building moratoriums;
|
|
|
|
limit the number of commercial properties that may be built;
|
|
|
|
change building codes and construction requirements affecting
property under construction;
|
|
|
|
increase the cost of development and construction; and
|
|
|
|
delay development and construction.
|
Woodbridge may also at times not be in compliance with all
regulatory requirements. If Woodbridge is not in compliance with
regulatory requirements, it may be subject to penalties or it
may be forced to incur significant expenses to cure any
noncompliance. In addition, some of Woodbridges land has
not yet received planning approvals or entitlements necessary
for development. Failure to obtain entitlements necessary for
land development on a timely basis or to the extent desired may
adversely affect Woodbridges operating results.
Several governmental authorities have also imposed impact fees
as a means of defraying the cost of providing governmental
services to developing areas, and many of these fees have
increased significantly during recent years.
Building
moratoriums and changes in governmental regulations may subject
Woodbridge to delays or increased costs of construction or
prohibit development of its properties.
Woodbridge may be subject to delays or may be precluded from
developing in certain communities because of building
moratoriums or changes in statutes or rules that could be
imposed in the future. The State of Florida and various counties
have in the past and may in the future continue to declare
moratoriums on the issuance of building permits and impose
restrictions in areas where the infrastructure, such as roads,
schools, parks, water and sewage treatment facilities and other
public facilities, does not reach minimum standards.
Additionally, certain counties in Florida, including counties
where Woodbridge is developing projects, have enacted more
stringent building codes which have resulted in increased costs
of construction. As a consequence, Woodbridge may incur
significant expenses in connection with complying with new
regulatory requirements that it may not be able to pass on to
purchasers or tenants.
Woodbridge
is subject to environmental laws and the cost of compliance
could adversely affect its business.
As a current or previous owner or operator of real property,
Woodbridge may be liable under federal, state, and local
environmental laws, ordinances and regulations for the costs of
removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances on,
under or in the property. These laws often impose liability
whether or not Woodbridge knew of, or was responsible for, the
presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. The cost of
investigating, remediating or removing such hazardous or toxic
substances may be substantial. The presence of
33
any such substance, or the failure to promptly remediate any
such substance, may adversely affect Woodbridges ability
to sell or lease the property, to use the property for its
intended purpose, or, if Woodbridge deems necessary or desirable
in the future, to borrow funds using the property as collateral.
Increased
insurance risk could negatively affect Woodbridges
business.
Insurance and surety companies may take actions that could
negatively affect Woodbridges business, including
increasing insurance premiums, requiring higher self-insured
retentions and deductibles, requiring additional collateral or
covenants on surety bonds, reducing limits, restricting
coverages, imposing exclusions, and refusing to underwrite
certain risks and classes of business. Any of these actions may
adversely affect Woodbridges ability to obtain appropriate
insurance coverage at reasonable costs which could have a
material adverse effect on Woodbridges business.
Woodbridges
results may vary.
Like other companies engaged in real estate activities,
Woodbridge has historically experienced, and expects to continue
to experience, variability in operating results on a quarterly
basis and from year to year. Factors expected to contribute to
this variability include:
|
|
|
|
|
the cyclical nature of the real estate industry;
|
|
|
|
prevailing interest rates and the availability of financing;
|
|
|
|
weather;
|
|
|
|
cost and availability of materials and labor;
|
|
|
|
competitive conditions;
|
|
|
|
timing of sales of land;
|
|
|
|
the timing of receipt of regulatory and other governmental
approvals for land development projects; and
|
|
|
|
the timing of the sale of its commercial leasing operations.
|
Levitt
and Sons had surety bonds on most of its projects, some of which
were subject to indemnity by Woodbridge.
Levitt and Sons, a former wholly owned subsidiary of Woodbridge
which filed a voluntary bankruptcy petition in November 2007 and
was deconsolidated from Woodbridge at that time, had
approximately $33.3 million of surety bonds outstanding
relating to its ongoing projects at the time it filed its
voluntary bankruptcy petition. In the event that these
obligations are drawn and paid by the surety, Woodbridge could
be responsible for up to $11.7 million plus costs and
expenses in accordance with the surety indemnity agreements
executed by Woodbridge. At June 30, 2009, Woodbridge had
$1.1 million in surety bonds accrual related to certain
bonds where management believes it to be probable that
Woodbridge will be required to reimburse the surety under
applicable indemnity agreements. It is unclear whether and to
what extent the remaining outstanding surety bonds of Levitt and
Sons will be drawn and the extent to which Woodbridge may be
responsible for additional amounts beyond this accrual. There is
no assurance that Woodbridge will not be responsible for amounts
in excess of the $1.1 million accrual. Additionally, in
September 2008, a surety filed a lawsuit to require Woodbridge
to post collateral against a portion of the $11.7 million
surety bonds exposure relating to two bonds totaling
$5.4 million after a municipality made claims against the
surety. Woodbridge believes that the municipality does not have
the right to demand payment under the bonds and initiated a
lawsuit against the municipality. However, as claims have been
made on the bonds, the surety requested that Woodbridge post a
$4.0 million letter of credit as security while the matter
is litigated with the municipality, and Woodbridge has complied
with that request. Based on its belief that a loss is not
probable, Woodbridge did not accrue any amount in connection
with this claim as of June 30, 2009. However, there is no
assurance as to the outcome of this litigation or the extent, if
any, of Woodbridges responsibility for the amounts owed
related to these surety bonds. Woodbridge will not receive any
repayment, assets or other
34
consideration as recovery of any amounts it may be required to
pay. If losses on additional surety bonds are identified,
Woodbridge will need to take additional charges associated with
its exposure under the indemnities, and this may have a material
adverse effect on Woodbridges results of operations and
financial condition.
Woodbridge
and its subsidiaries are highly leveraged, and this indebtedness
imposes restrictions on their operations and activities and
could adversely affect Woodbridges financial
condition.
At June 30, 2009, Woodbridges consolidated debt was
approximately $348.5 million, of which approximately
$214 million related to Core Communities.
Certain loans which provide the primary financing for Tradition,
Florida and Tradition Hilton Head have annual appraisal and
re-margining requirements. These provisions may require Core
Communities, in circumstances where the value of its real estate
securing these loans declines, to pay down a portion of the
principal amount of the loans to bring the loans within
specified minimum
loan-to-value
ratios. Accordingly, should land prices decline to the point at
which the loans fall below their specified minimum
loan-to-value
ratios, reappraisals could result in significant future
re-margining payments. In addition, all of Woodbridges
outstanding debt instruments require Woodbridge to comply with
certain financial covenants. Further, one of Woodbridges
debt instruments contains cross-default provisions, which could
cause a default on this debt instrument if Woodbridge defaults
on other debt instruments. If Woodbridge fails to comply with
any of these restrictions or covenants, the holders of the
applicable debt could cause Woodbridges debt to become due
and payable prior to maturity. These accelerations or
significant re-margining payments could require Woodbridge to
dedicate a substantial portion of its cash and cash flow from
operations to payment of or on its debt and reduce its ability
to use its cash for other purposes.
Cores loan agreements generally require repayment of
specified amounts upon a sale of a portion of the property
collateralizing the debt. Core also is subject to provisions in
some of its loan agreements that may require additional
principal payments, known as curtailment payments. Core made
curtailment payments totaling approximately $19.9 million
during 2008. Although, to date, no curtailment payments have
been made during 2009, additional curtailment payments may be
required in the future if the unfavorable current trends in the
real estate market continue.
At June 30, 2009, Woodbridges anticipated minimum
principal debt payment obligations for the remainder of 2009
totaled approximately $1.9 million, assuming the exercise
of all loan extensions available at Woodbridges
discretion, in each case exclusive of (i) any re-margining
payments that could be required in the event that property
serving as collateral becomes impaired, (ii) any
curtailment payments which may be required in the event sales
are below contractual minimums and (iii) any additional
amounts which may become due upon a sale of the property
securing the loan. Woodbridges business may not generate
sufficient cash flow from operations, and future borrowings may
not be available under Woodbridges existing credit
facilities or any other financing sources in an amount
sufficient, to enable it to service its indebtedness or fund its
other liquidity needs. Woodbridge may need to refinance all or a
portion of its debt on or before maturity, which, due to, among
other factors, the recent disruptions in the credit and capital
markets, Woodbridge may not be able to do on favorable terms or
at all.
Core has engaged a restructuring firm to review its cash flow
models, review the terms of its outstanding indebtedness and,
where appropriate, enter into discussions with its lenders
relating to a restructuring of its debt. If Core is not
successful in restructuring its debt, it may not have sufficient
resources to timely meet its obligations.
Cores obligations are generally independent of Woodbridge,
and Woodbridge, except in certain circumstances, is not legally
obligated to support Core. There is no assurance that Woodbridge
will provide additional resources to Core in the event that Core
requires additional funds in order to meet its obligations as
they become due. If Core is not able to meet its obligations as
they become due, the lenders under the defaulted loans could
foreclose on any property which serves as collateral for the
defaulted loan, and Core could be forced to cease or
significantly curtail its operations, which would likely result
in significant impairment charges and losses at Woodbridge.
35
Woodbridges
current business strategy may require it to obtain additional
capital, which may not be available on favorable terms, if at
all.
There is no assurance that Woodbridge will be able to continue
to develop its real estate projects and pursue new investments
as currently contemplated using solely its capital on hand. As a
result, Woodbridge may in the future need to obtain additional
financing in an effort to successfully implement its business
strategy. These funds may be obtained through public or private
debt or equity financings by Woodbridge or its subsidiaries,
additional bank borrowings or from strategic alliances.
Woodbridge may not be successful in obtaining additional funds
in a timely manner, on favorable terms or at all, especially in
light of the current adverse conditions in the capital and
credit markets and, with respect to the funding of Cores
master-planned communities, the adverse conditions in municipal
bond markets which may impact Woodbridges ability to
access tax-exempt bond financing. Moreover, certain of
Woodbridges bank financing agreements contain provisions
that limit the type and amount of debt that Woodbridge may incur
in the future without the lenders consent. If Woodbridge
is unable to obtain any additional capital necessary to fund its
real estate operations or pursue or consummate new investments,
Woodbridge may be required to delay, scale back or abandon some
or all of its land development activities, or liquidate certain
of its assets, and Woodbridge may not be able to successfully
implement its business strategy with respect to new investments.
The occurrence of any of the above events may adversely impact
Woodbridges operating results and financial condition.
Woodbridge
is subject to the risks of the businesses that it currently
holds investments in, and Woodbridges future acquisitions
may reduce its earnings, require it to obtain additional
financing, and expose it to additional risks.
Woodbridge currently holds investments in Bluegreen, Office
Depot and Pizza Fusion and, as a result, Woodbridge is subject
to the risks faced by those companies in their respective
industries. Each has been adversely affected by the downturn in
the economy, loss of consumer confidence and disruptions in the
credit markets. In addition, Woodbridges business strategy
includes the possibility of making material investments in other
industries. Further, investments or acquisitions that Woodbridge
completes may not prove to be successful. Acquisitions may
expose Woodbridge to additional risks, including the risks faced
by the acquired businesses, and may have a material adverse
effect on Woodbridges results of operations if, among
other things, the acquired businesses do not perform as expected
or the acquisitions do not otherwise accomplish
Woodbridges strategic objectives.
In addition, Woodbridge will likely face competition in making
investments or acquisitions which could increase the costs
associated with the investment or acquisition. Woodbridges
investments or acquisitions could initially reduce its per share
earnings and add significant amortization expense or intangible
asset charges. Since Woodbridges acquisition strategy
involves holding investments for the foreseeable future and
because Woodbridge does not expect to generate significant
excess cash flow from operations, Woodbridge may rely on
additional debt or equity financing at the parent company or
subsidiary level to implement its acquisition strategy. The
issuance of debt will result in additional leverage which could
limit Woodbridges operating flexibility, and the issuance
of equity could result in additional dilution to
Woodbridges shareholders. In addition, such financing
could consist of equity securities which have rights,
preferences or privileges senior to Woodbridges
Class A or Class B Common Stock or which dilute
Woodbridges ownership interest in its subsidiaries.
Woodbridge does not intend to seek shareholder approval of any
investments or acquisitions unless required by law or regulation.
If
current economic conditions do not improve, Woodbridge may incur
additional impairment charges in the future relating to its
investments, which would adversely impact Woodbridges
financial condition and operating results.
Woodbridge owns approximately 9.5 million shares, or
approximately 31%, of Bluegreens common stock. During
2008, Woodbridge began evaluating its investment in Bluegreen on
a quarterly basis for other-than-temporary impairments. Based on
the results of its evaluations during the quarters ended
September 30, 2008, December 31, 2008 and
March 31, 2009, Woodbridge determined that
other-than-temporary impairments were necessary for those
periods. As a result, Woodbridge recorded impairment charges of
$53.6 million,
36
$40.8 million and $20.4 million during the quarters
ended September 30, 2008, December 31, 2008 and
March 31, 2009, respectively. Based on its impairment
evaluation performed during the quarter ended June 30,
2009, Woodbridge determined that its investment in Bluegreen was
not impaired at June 30, 2009. As of June 30, 2009,
the carrying value of Woodbridges investment in Bluegreen
was $28.6 million. There can be no assurance that
Woodbridge will not be required to record further impairment
charges in the future relating to its investment in Bluegreen.
Woodbridge also owns approximately 1.4 million shares of
Office Depots common stock, representing less than 1% of
such stock. These shares are accounted for as
available-for-sale
securities and are carried at fair value. During the quarters
ended December 31 2008, March 31, 2009 and June 30,
2009, Woodbridge performed impairment analyses of its investment
in Office Depot. As a result of these analyses, Woodbridge
determined that other-than-temporary impairment charges were
required at December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009 and
recorded a $12.0 million impairment charge relating to its
investment in Office Depot in the three months ended
December 31, 2008 and an additional $2.4 million
impairment charge in the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Based on its impairment evaluation performed during the quarter
ended June 30, 2009, Woodbridge determined that its
investment in Office Depot was not impaired at June 30,
2009. The carrying value of Woodbridges investment in
Office Depot was $6.5 million as of June 30, 2009.
There can be no assurance that Woodbridge will not be required
to record future
other-than-temporary
impairment adjustments relating to its investment in Office
Depot in the future. On August 6, 2009, the closing price of
Office Depots common stock on the New York Stock Exchange
was $5.06 per share.
In the event Woodbridge records impairments in the future with
respect to its current or future investments, then the cost of
the investment determined to be impaired will be written down to
its fair value with a corresponding charge to earnings, which
would adversely impact Woodbridges financial condition and
operating results.
Woodbridge
is subject to certain additional risks relating to its
investment in Bluegreen.
Although Bluegreens common stock is traded on the New York
Stock Exchange, based on Woodbridges percentage ownership
in Bluegreen, the shares of Bluegreens common stock owned
by Woodbridge may be deemed restricted stock, which would limit
Woodbridges ability to liquidate its investment in
Bluegreen if it chooses to do so. In addition, while Woodbridge
has made a significant investment in Bluegreen, Bluegreen does
not currently pay dividends to its shareholders, and Woodbridge
does not expect to receive any dividends from Bluegreen in the
foreseeable future.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, Woodbridges
earnings from its investment in Bluegreen were $9.0 million
(after the amortization of approximately $9.2 million
related to the change in the basis as a result of the impairment
charge at September 30, 2008), compared to
$10.3 million in 2007 and $9.7 million in 2006. For
the six months ended June 30, 2009, Woodbridges
earnings from its investment in Bluegreen were
$17.1 million. At June 30, 2009, the carrying value of
Woodbridges investment in Bluegreen was
$28.6 million. A significant portion of Woodbridges
earnings and book value are dependent upon Bluegreens
ability to operate its business plan successfully, which may be
difficult in the current economic environment.
The
loss of the services of Woodbridges key management and
personnel could adversely affect Woodbridges
business.
Woodbridges ability to successfully implement its business
strategy depends on its ability to attract and retain
experienced and knowledgeable management and other professional
staff. There is no assurance that Woodbridge will be successful
in attracting and retaining key management personnel.
Woodbridges
controlling shareholders have the voting power to control the
outcome of any shareholder vote, except in limited
circumstances.
BFC owns all of the issued and outstanding shares of
Woodbridges Class B Common Stock and
3,735,392 shares, or approximately 22%, of
Woodbridges issued and outstanding Class A Common
Stock. In the aggregate, these shares represent approximately
24% of Woodbridges total equity and approximately 59%
37
of Woodbridges total voting power. Since Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock vote as
a single group on most matters, BFC is in a position to control
Woodbridge and elect a majority of its board of directors.
Additionally, Alan B. Levan, Woodbridges Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer, and John E. Abdo, Woodbridges
Vice Chairman, collectively beneficially own shares of
BFCs Class A Common Stock and Class B Common
Stock representing approximately 74% of BFCs total voting
power. As a result, Messrs. Levan and Abdo effectively have
the voting power to control the outcome of any vote of
Woodbridges shareholders, except in those limited
circumstances where Florida law mandates that the holders of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock vote as a separate
class. BFCs interests may conflict with the interests of
Woodbridges other shareholders.
Woodbridges
net operating loss carryforwards may not be utilized within the
foreseeable future, if at all.
Woodbridge has experienced and continues to experience net
operating losses. Under the Code, Woodbridge may utilize its net
operating loss carryforwards in certain circumstances to offset
future taxable income and to reduce federal income tax
liability, subject to certain requirements and restrictions.
Based on the determination that it is more likely than not that
Woodbridge will not generate sufficient income to be in a
position to realize its deferred tax asset, a full valuation
allowance against the deferred tax assets related to those net
operating losses has been recorded. Furthermore, there is no
assurance that Woodbridge will generate sufficient income to be
able to utilize any net operating loss carryforwards in the
future.
While Woodbridges ability to use its net operating loss
carryforwards could be substantially limited if Woodbridge
experiences an ownership change, as defined in
Section 382 of the Code, Woodbridge does not believe that
the merger, if consummated, will result in any material
limitations under Section 382 of the Code on the
utilization of its net operating loss carryforwards.
In the
event that the merger is not consummated, Woodbridges
status as a public company will continue; however, under certain
circumstances, Woodbridge may choose to de-register its
securities from registration with the SEC and, therefore, cease
filing reports with the SEC. This could result in lower prices
and more limited trading of Woodbridges securities as well
as adversely impact Woodbridges ability to raise
capital.
During 2008, Woodbridge failed to meet the minimum continued
listing requirements of the New York Stock Exchange necessary to
cause Woodbridges Class A Common Stock to maintain
its listing on such exchange. As a result, Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock was de-listed from the New York Stock
Exchange, and it now trades on the Pink Sheets. Pursuant to the
rules of the SEC, if at any time the number of record holders of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock falls below 300,
including accounts held through depositories and institutional
custodians, then Woodbridge would be permitted to elect to
de-register its securities, which de-registration would be
effective 90 days after making the appropriate filing with
the SEC. If Woodbridge de-registers its securities from the SEC,
then Woodbridge would cease filing periodic reports with the
SEC, including current reports on
Form 8-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q
and annual reports on
Form 10-K,
which would result in less information about Woodbridge being
publicly available to investors. This could result in a lower
trading price of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock,
may make it more difficult for the holders of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock to sell or purchase shares of such
stock, and may cause it to be more difficult for Woodbridge to
raise capital, which could materially and adversely impact
Woodbridges business, prospects, financial condition and
results of operations.
38
Risks
Related to BankAtlantic Bancorp and BankAtlantic
The following are risks related to BankAtlantic Bancorp (and
its federal savings bank subsidiary, BankAtlantic), whose
results of operations are consolidated with BFC. The only assets
available to BFC from BankAtlantic Bancorp are dividends when
and if declared and paid by BankAtlantic Bancorp. BankAtlantic
Bancorp is a separate public company and its management prepared
the following Risk Factors which were included in BankAtlantic
Bancorps Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008. Accordingly,
references to the Company, we,
us , our or Parent Company
in this Risks Related to BankAtlantic Bancorp and
BankAtlantic section are references to BankAtlantic
Bancorp and its subsidiaries, including BankAtlantic, and
BankAtlantic Bancorps and BankAtlantics management,
and are not references to BFC or Woodbridge.
Adverse
market conditions have affected and may continue to affect the
financial services industry as well as BankAtlantic
Bancorps business and results of operations.
Our financial condition and results of operations have been, and
may continue to be, adversely impacted as a result of the
downturn in the U.S. housing market and general economic
conditions. Dramatic declines in the national and, in
particular, Florida housing markets over the past year, with
falling home prices and increasing foreclosures and
unemployment, have negatively impacted the credit performance of
our loans and resulted in significant asset impairments at all
financial institutions, including government-sponsored entities,
major commercial and investment banks, and regional and
community financial institutions including BankAtlantic.
Reflecting concern about the stability of the financial markets
generally and the strength of counterparties, many lenders and
institutional investors have reduced or ceased providing funding
to borrowers, including to other financial institutions. This
market turmoil and tightening of credit have led to an increased
level of commercial and consumer delinquencies, lack of consumer
confidence, increased market volatility and widespread reduction
of business activity generally. The continuing economic pressure
on consumers and lack of confidence in the financial markets has
adversely affected our business, financial condition and results
of operations. The difficult conditions in the financial markets
and real estate markets are not expected to improve in the
foreseeable future. A worsening of these conditions would likely
exacerbate the adverse effects of these difficult market
conditions on BankAtlantic and others in the financial services
industry. In particular, we may face the following risks in
connection with these events:
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantics borrowers may be unable to make timely
repayments of their loans, or the value of real estate
collateral securing the payment of such loans may decrease which
could result in increased delinquencies, foreclosures and
customer bankruptcies, any of which would increase levels of
non-performing loans resulting in significant credit losses,
increased expenses and could have a material adverse effect on
our operating results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Further disruptions in the capital markets or other events,
including actions by rating agencies and deteriorating investor
expectations, may result in an inability to borrow on favorable
terms or at all from other financial institutions or government
entities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increased regulation of the industry may increase costs and
limit BankAtlantics activities and operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increased competition among financial services companies based
on the recent consolidation of competing financial institutions
and the conversion of investment banks into bank holding
companies, may adversely affect BankAtlantics ability to
market its products and services.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic may be required to pay significantly higher FDIC
deposit premiums and assessments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer confidence in the financial industry has weakened and
individual wealth has deteriorated, which could lead to declines
in deposits and impact liquidity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continued asset valuation declines could adversely impact our
credit losses and result in additional goodwill and other asset
impairments.
|
39
There
can be no assurance that recent steps taken by Congress, the
FDIC and the Federal Reserve will stabilize the U.S. financial
system.
On October 3, 2008, President Bush signed into law the
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, as amended (the
EESA). The legislation was in response to the
financial crises affecting the banking system and financial
markets, and going concern threats to investment banks and other
financial institutions. The U.S. Department of Treasury (the
U.S. Treasury) and federal banking regulators
are implementing a number of programs under this legislation and
otherwise to address capital and liquidity issues in the banking
system, including the U.S. Treasurys Capital Purchase
Program (the CPP), pursuant to which the
U.S. Treasury has made senior preferred stock investments
in participating financial institutions. In addition, other
regulators have taken steps to attempt to stabilize and add
liquidity to the financial markets, such as the FDICs
Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program, pursuant to which, under
the systemic risk exception to the Federal Deposit Act (the
FDA), the FDIC has offered a guarantee of certain
financial institution indebtedness in exchange for an insurance
premium payment made to the FDIC by the participating financial
institution.
On February 10, 2009, the Treasury announced a new
comprehensive financial stability plan (the Financial
Stability Plan), which earmarked the second
$350 billion originally authorized under the EESA. The
Financial Stability Plan is intended to, among other things,
make capital available to financial institutions, purchase
certain legacy loans and assets from financial institutions,
restart securitization markets for loans to consumers and
businesses and relieve certain pressures on the housing market,
including the reduction of mortgage payments and interest rates.
In addition, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009
(the ARRA), which was signed into law on
February 17, 2009, includes, among other things, extensive
new restrictions on the compensation arrangements of financial
institutions participating in the CPP.
There have been numerous actions undertaken in connection with
or following EESA, the Financial Stability Plan and ARRA by the
Federal Reserve Board, U.S. Congress, the
U.S. Treasury, the FDIC, the SEC and others in efforts to
address the current liquidity and credit crisis in the financial
industry that followed the
sub-prime
mortgage market meltdown which began in late 2007. These
measures include homeowner relief that encourages loan
restructuring and modification; the establishment of significant
liquidity and credit facilities for financial institutions and
investment banks; the lowering of the federal funds rate;
emergency action against short selling practices; a temporary
guaranty program for money market funds; the establishment of a
commercial paper funding facility to provide back-stop liquidity
to commercial paper issuers; coordinated international efforts
to address illiquidity and other weaknesses in the banking
sector and other programs being developed.
There can be no assurance, however, as to the actual impact that
these government initiatives will have on the financial markets,
including the extreme levels of market volatility and limited
credit availability currently being experienced. The failure of
these government initiatives to stabilize the financial markets,
or a continuation or worsening of current financial market
conditions, could materially and adversely affect
BankAtlantics business, financial condition, results of
operations and access to credit. Any such failure may also
adversely impact the trading price of the Companys
Class A common stock.
In addition, the EESA, ARRA and the Financial Stability Plan are
relatively new initiatives and, as such, are subject to change
and evolving interpretation. There can be no assurances as to
the effects that any further changes will have on the
effectiveness of the governments efforts to stabilize the
credit markets or on BankAtlantics business, financial
condition or results of operations.
As previously announced, the Company and BankAtlantic filed an
application to participate in the CPP. The United States
Treasury had not, as of March 16, 2009, acted on the
application and such application may not be approved. Further,
the Companys decision to defer quarterly payment of
interest on its outstanding trust preferred junior subordinated
debentures may adversely impact our application to receive funds
under the CPP.
40
The
impact on BankAtlantic Bancorp of recently enacted legislation,
in particular the EESA and its implementing regulations, and
actions by the FDIC, cannot be predicted at this
time.
The programs established or to be established under the EESA and
Troubled Asset Relief Program may have adverse effects upon us.
Our industry may be subject to increased regulation, and
compliance with such regulations may increase our costs and
limit our ability to pursue business opportunities. Also,
participation in specific programs may subject us to additional
restrictions. For example, if we participate in the CPP, our
ability to make dividend payments or to repurchase our common
stock will be limited and subject to the restrictions contained
in that program for so long as any securities issued under such
program remain outstanding. It will also subject us to
additional executive compensation restrictions. Similarly,
programs established by the FDIC under the systemic risk
exception of the FDA, may have an adverse effect on us and we
anticipate that the cost of FDIC premiums will increase.
The
decline in the Florida real estate market has adversely
affected, and may continue to adversely affect, BankAtlantic
Bancorps earnings and financial condition.
The continued deterioration of economic conditions in the
Florida residential real estate market, including the continued
decline in home sales and median home prices
year-over-year
in all major metropolitan areas in Florida, and the recent
downturn in the Florida commercial real estate market, resulted
in a substantial increase in non-performing assets and
BankAtlantics provision for loan losses. The housing
industry is in the midst of a substantial and prolonged downturn
reflecting, in part, decreased availability of mortgage
financing for residential home buyers, reduced demand for new
construction resulting in a significant over-supply of housing
inventory and increased foreclosure rates. Additionally, the
deteriorating condition of the Florida economy and these adverse
market conditions have negatively impacted the commercial
non-residential real estate market. BankAtlantics earnings
and financial condition were adversely impacted during 2008 as
the majority of its loans are secured by real estate in Florida.
We expect that our earnings and financial condition will
continue to be unfavorably impacted if market conditions do not
improve or deteriorate further. At December 31, 2008,
BankAtlantics loan portfolio included $208.1 million
of non-accrual loans concentrated in Florida.
BankAtlantics
loan portfolio is concentrated in real estate lending which
makes it more susceptible to credit losses given the current
depressed real estate market.
The national real estate market declined significantly during
2007 and 2008, particularly in Florida, BankAtlantics
primary lending area. BankAtlantics loan portfolio is
concentrated in commercial real estate loans (virtually all of
which are located in Florida and many of which involve
residential land development), residential mortgages
(nationwide), and consumer home-equity loans (throughout
BankAtlantics markets in Florida). BankAtlantic has a
heightened exposure to credit losses that may arise from this
concentration as a result of the significant downturn in the
Florida real estate markets. At December 31, 2008
BankAtlantics loan portfolio included $2.7 billion of
loans concentrated in Florida, which represented approximately
60% of its loan portfolio.
We believe that BankAtlantics commercial residential
development loan portfolio has significant exposure to further
declines in the Florida residential real estate market. The
builder land bank loan category consists of 7 loans
and aggregates $62.4 million of which four loans totaling
$40.4 million were on non-accrual as of December 31,
2008. The land acquisition and development loan
category consists of 25 loans and aggregates $165.8 million
of which three loans totaling $33.2 million were on
non-accrual as of December 31, 2008. The land
acquisition, development and construction loan category
consists of 14 loans and aggregates $75.5 million of which
three loans totaling $18.5 million were on non-accrual as
of December 31, 2008.
In addition to the loans described above, during 2008, the
Company formed an asset workout subsidiary which acquired
non-performing commercial and commercial residential real estate
loans from BankAtlantic. The balance of these non-performing
loans as of December 31, 2008 was $79.3 million with
$22.0 million, $16.8 million and $29.2 million of
builder land bank loans, land acquisition and
development loans, and land acquisition, development
and construction loans, respectively.
41
Market conditions may result in our commercial real estate
borrowers having difficulty selling lots or homes in their
developments for an extended period, which in turn could result
in an increase in residential construction loan delinquencies
and non-accrual balances. Additionally, if the current economic
environment continues for a prolonged period of time or
deteriorates further, collateral values may even further decline
and are likely to result in increased credit losses in these
loans.
Included in the commercial real estate loans are approximately
$225 million of commercial non-residential construction
loans. These loans could be susceptible to extended maturities
or borrower default, and BankAtlantic could experience higher
credit losses and non-performing loans in this portfolio if the
economy remains at depressed levels particularly in Florida or
if commercial non-residential real estate market values further
decline.
BankAtlantics commercial non-residential loan portfolio
includes loans collateralized by income producing properties
such as retail shopping centers, warehouses, and office
buildings. The current recession has negatively impacted the
cash flow generated from these rental properties which in turn
impacts the borrowers ability to fund the debt service on
their loans. If market conditions do not improve or deteriorate
further, BankAtlantic may recognize higher credit losses on
these loans, which would adversely affect our results of
operations and financial condition.
BankAtlantics commercial real estate loan portfolio
includes large lending relationships, including 5 relationships
with unaffiliated borrowers involving lending commitments in
each case in excess of $30 million. Defaults by any of
these borrowers could have a material adverse effect on
BankAtlantics results.
BankAtlantics
consumer loan portfolio is concentrated in home equity loans
collateralized by Florida properties primarily located in the
markets where BankAtlantic operates its store
network.
The decline in residential real estate prices and residential
home sales throughout Florida has resulted in an increase in
mortgage delinquencies and higher foreclosure rates.
Additionally, in response to the turmoil in the credit markets,
financial institutions have tightened underwriting standards
which has limited borrowers ability to refinance. These
conditions have adversely impacted delinquencies and credit loss
trends in BankAtlantics home equity loan portfolio and it
does not currently appear that these conditions will improve in
the near term. Approximately 80% of the loans in
BankAtlantics home equity portfolio are residential second
mortgages and BankAtlantic experienced heighted delinquencies
and credit losses in this portfolio during 2008. If current
economic conditions do not improve and home prices continue to
fall, BankAtlantic may experience higher credit losses from this
loan portfolio. Since the collateral for this portfolio
primarily consists of second mortgages, it is unlikely that
BankAtlantic will be successful in recovering all or any portion
of its loan proceeds in the event of a default unless
BankAtlantic is prepared to repay the first mortgage and such
repayment and the costs associated with a foreclosure are
justified by the value of the property.
BankAtlantics
interest-only residential loans expose it to greater credit
risks.
While they have performed satisfactorily to date,
approximately 50% of BankAtlantics purchased
residential loan portfolio (approximately $980 million)
consists of interest-only loans. While these loans are not
considered
sub-prime or
negative amortizing loans, they are loans with reduced initial
loan payments with the potential for significant increases in
monthly loan payments in subsequent periods, even if interest
rates do not rise, as required amortization of the principal
commences. Monthly loan payments will also increase as interest
rates increase. This presents a potential repayment risk if the
borrower is unable to meet the higher debt service obligations
or refinance the loan. As previously noted, current economic
conditions in the residential real estate markets and the
mortgage finance markets have made it more difficult for
borrowers to refinance their mortgages which also increases our
exposure to loss.
An
increase in BankAtlantics allowance for loan losses will
result in reduced earnings.
As a lender, BankAtlantic is exposed to the risk that its
customers will be unable to repay their loans according to their
terms and that any collateral securing the payment of their
loans will not be sufficient to
42
assure full repayment. BankAtlantic evaluates the
collectability of its loan portfolio and provides an allowance
for loan losses that it believes is adequate based upon such
factors as:
|
|
|
|
|
the risk characteristics of various classifications of loans;
|
|
|
|
|
|
previous loan loss experience;
|
|
|
|
|
|
specific loans that have probable loss potential;
|
|
|
|
|
|
estimated fair value of the collateral;
|
|
|
|
|
|
current economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the views of its regulators; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
geographic and industry loan concentrations.
|
Many of these factors are difficult to predict or estimate
accurately, particularly in a changing economic environment. The
process of determining the estimated losses inherent in
BankAtlantics loan portfolio requires subjective and
complex judgments and the level of uncertainty concerning
economic conditions may adversely affect BankAtlantics
ability to estimate the incurred losses in its loan portfolio.
If BankAtlantics evaluation is incorrect and borrower
defaults cause losses exceeding the portion of the allowance for
loan losses allocated to those loans, our earnings could be
significantly and adversely affected. BankAtlantic may
experience losses in its loan portfolios or perceive adverse
trends that require it to significantly increase its allowance
for loan losses in the future, which would reduce future
earnings.
Increases in the allowance for loan losses with respect to the
loans held by our asset workout subsidiary, or losses in that
portfolio which exceed the current allowance assigned to that
portfolio, would similarly adversely affect us.
BankAtlantics
loan portfolio subjects it to high levels of credit and
counterparty risk.
We are exposed to the risk that our borrowers or counter-parties
may default on their obligations. Credit risk arises through the
extension of loans, certain securities, letters of credit and
financial guarantees and through counter-party exposure on
trading and wholesale loan transactions. In an attempt to manage
this risk, we seek to establish policies and procedures to
manage both on and off-balance sheet (primarily loan
commitments) credit risk.
BankAtlantic attempts to manage credit exposure to individual
borrowers and counter-parties on an aggregate basis including
loans, securities, letters of credit, derivatives and unfunded
commitments. While credit personnel analyze the creditworthiness
of individual borrowers or counter-parties, and limits are
established for the total credit exposure to any one borrower or
counter-party, such limits may not have the effect of adequately
limiting credit exposure. BankAtlantic also enters into
participation agreements with or acquires participation
interests from other lenders to limit its credit risk, but will
be subject to risks with respect to its interest in the loan and
will not be in a position to make independent determinations in
its sole discretion with respect to its interests. The majority
of BankAtlantics residential loans are serviced by others.
The servicing agreements may restrict BankAtlantics
ability to initiate work-out and modification arrangements with
borrowers which could adversely impact BankAtlantics
ability to minimize losses on non-performing loans.
The Company is also exposed to credit and counterparty risks
with respect to loans held in our asset workout subsidiary.
Adverse
events in Florida, where BankAtlantics business is
currently concentrated, could adversely impact its results and
future growth.
BankAtlantics business, the location of its stores, the
primary source of repayment for its small business loans and the
real estate collateralizing its commercial real estate loans
(and the loans held by our asset
43
workout subsidiary) and its home equity loans are primarily
concentrated in Florida. As a result, we are exposed to
geographic risks, as unemployment, declines in the housing
industry and declines in the real estate market are more severe
in Florida than in the rest of the country. Adverse changes in
laws and regulations in Florida would have a greater negative
impact on our revenues, financial condition and business than
similar institutions in markets outside of Florida. Further, the
State of Florida is subject to the risks of natural disasters
such as tropical storms and hurricanes.
Changes
in interest rates could adversely affect BankAtlantics net
interest income and profitability.
The majority of BankAtlantics assets and liabilities are
monetary in nature. As a result, the earnings and growth of
BankAtlantic are significantly affected by interest rates, which
are subject to the influence of economic conditions generally,
both domestic and foreign, events in the capital markets and
also to the monetary and fiscal policies of the United States
and its agencies, particularly the Federal Reserve Board. The
nature and timing of any changes in such policies or general
economic conditions and their effect on BankAtlantic cannot be
controlled and are extremely difficult to predict. Changes in
interest rates can impact BankAtlantics net interest
income as well as the valuation of its assets and liabilities.
Banking is an industry that depends to a large extent on its net
interest income. Net interest income is the difference between:
|
|
|
|
|
interest income on interest-earning assets, such as
loans; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, such as
deposits.
|
Changes in interest rates can have differing effects on
BankAtlantics net interest income. In particular, changes
in market interest rates, changes in the relationships between
short-term and long-term market interest rates, or the yield
curve, or changes in the relationships between different
interest rate indices can affect the interest rates charged on
interest-earning assets differently than the interest rates paid
on interest-bearing liabilities. This difference could result in
an increase in interest expense relative to interest income and
therefore reduce BankAtlantics net interest income. While
BankAtlantic has attempted to structure its asset and liability
management strategies to mitigate the impact on net interest
income of changes in market interest rates, we cannot provide
assurances that BankAtlantic will be successful in doing so.
Loan and mortgage-backed securities prepayment decisions are
also affected by interest rates. Loan and securities prepayments
generally accelerate as interest rates fall. Prepayments in a
declining interest rate environment reduce BankAtlantics
net interest income and adversely affect its earnings because:
|
|
|
|
|
it amortizes premiums on acquired loans and securities, and if
loans or securities are prepaid, the unamortized premium will be
charged off; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the yields it earns on the investment of funds that it receives
from prepaid loans and securities are generally less than the
yields that it earned on the prepaid loans.
|
Significant loan prepayments in BankAtlantics mortgage and
investment portfolios in the future could have an adverse effect
on BankAtlantics earnings as proceeds from the repayment
of loans may be reinvested in loans with lower interest rates.
Additionally, increased prepayments associated with purchased
residential loans may result in increased amortization of
premiums on acquired loans, which would reduce
BankAtlantics interest income.
In a rising interest rate environment, loan and securities
prepayments generally decline, resulting in yields that are less
than the current market yields. In addition, the credit risks of
loans with adjustable rate mortgages may worsen as interest
rates rise and debt service obligations increase.
BankAtlantic uses a computer model using standard industry
software to quantify its interest rate risk, in support of its
Asset/Liability Committee. This model measures the potential
impact of gradual and abrupt changes in interest rates on
BankAtlantics net interest income. While management would
attempt to respond to the projected impact on net interest
income, there is no assurance that managements efforts
will be successful.
44
BankAtlantic
is subject to liquidity risk as its loans exceed its
deposits.
Like all financial institutions, BankAtlantics assets
exceed customer deposits and changes in interest rates,
availability of alternative investment opportunities, a loss of
confidence in financial institutions in general or BankAtlantic
in particular, and other factors may make deposit gathering more
difficult. If BankAtlantic experiences decreases in deposit
levels, it may need to increase its borrowings or liquidate a
portion of its assets which may not be readily saleable.
Additionally, interest rate changes or further disruptions in
the capital markets may make the terms of borrowings and
deposits less favorable. As a result, there is a risk that the
cost of funding will increase or that BankAtlantic will not have
funds to meet its obligations.
BankAtlantics
Floridas Most Convenient Bank initiative and
related infrastructure expansion to support a larger
organization has resulted in higher operating expenses, which
has had an adverse impact on its earnings.
BankAtlantics Floridas Most Convenient
Bank initiative, the opening of 32 stores from January
2005 to August 2008 and the related expansion of our
infrastructure and operations have required us to provide
additional management resources, hire additional personnel,
increase compensation, occupancy and marketing expenditures, and
take steps to enhance and expand our operational and management
information systems. The new stores are located throughout
Florida and represent a 51% increase, based on the number of
stores, in BankAtlantics retail network. Employee
compensation, occupancy and equipment and advertising expenses
have significantly increased since the inception of the
initiative, during 2002, from $78.9 million during 2001 to
$212.9 million during 2008. The current economic recession
has impacted the length of time required for these new stores to
achieve profitability. As a consequence, BankAtlantic is
currently reorganizing its operations in an attempt to improve
its performance by significantly reducing operating expenses
while focusing on its core businesses and maintaining quality
customer service. As part of this strategy, since 2007,
BankAtlantic has slowed its network expansions and reduced its
services hours and, in 2008, BankAtlantic sold five of its
branches located in Orlando to an independent financial
institution. While management is focused on reducing overall
expenses, there is no assurance that BankAtlantic will be
successful in efforts to significantly reduce these expenses and
the continuation of the current expense structure may have an
adverse impact on our results.
BankAtlantic
obtains a significant portion of its non-interest income through
service charges on core deposit accounts.
BankAtlantics deposit account growth has generated a
substantial amount of service charge income. The largest
component of this service charge income is overdraft fees.
Changes in customer behavior as well as increased competition
from other financial institutions could result in declines in
deposit accounts or in overdraft frequency resulting in a
decline in service charge income. Also, the downturn in the
Florida economy could result in the inability to collect
overdraft fees and a corresponding increase in our overdraft fee
reserves. Additionally, future changes in banking regulations,
in particular limitations on retail customer fees, may impact
this revenue source. Any of such changes could have a material
adverse effect on our results.
Deposit
premium insurance assessments may increase substantially, which
will adversely affect BankAtlantics
expenses.
BankAtlantics FDIC deposit insurance expense for the year
ended December 31, 2008 was $2.8 million. We expect,
however, that BankAtlantics FDIC deposit insurance
assessments will significantly increase in 2009 due to the
recent experience of the FDIC deposit insurance fund relating to
recent bank failures and the stress on the system. While the
amount of the increase is uncertain, any increase in the FDIC
deposit insurance will increase BankAtlantics expenses,
thereby adversely impacting our results.
Regulatory
compliance.
The banking industry is an industry subject to multiple layers
of regulation. Failure to comply with any of these regulations
can result in substantial penalties, significant restrictions on
business activities and growth
45
plans
and/or
limitations on dividend payments. As a holding company,
BankAtlantic Bancorp is also subject to significant regulation.
Changes in the regulation or capital requirements associated
with holding companies generally or BankAtlantic Bancorp in
particular could also have an adverse impact.
BankAtlantic
Bancorp may need to raise additional capital in the future and
such capital may not be available when needed or at
all.
In light of the current challenging economic environment, the
Company is considering raising funds to be in a position to
provide additional capital to BankAtlantic, if needed.
Additionally, the OTS could impose capital requirements on the
Company or could impose additional capital requirements on
BankAtlantic. Our ability to raise additional capital will
depend on, among other things, conditions in the financial
markets at the time, which are outside of our control, and our
financial condition, results of operations and prospects. The
ongoing liquidity crisis and the loss of confidence in financial
institutions may make it more difficult or more costly to obtain
financing.
There is no assurance that such capital will be available to us
on acceptable terms or at all. The terms and pricing of any
transaction by the Company or BankAtlantic could result in
substantial dilution to our existing shareholders and could
adversely impact the price of our Class A common stock.
Continued
capital and credit market volatility may adversely affect
BankAtlantic Bancorps ability to access capital and may
have a material adverse effect on its business, financial
condition and results of operations.
The capital and credit markets have been experiencing volatility
and disruption for more than a year. In recent months, the
volatility and disruption has reached unprecedented levels. In
some cases, the markets have produced downward pressure on stock
prices and credit availability for issuers without regard to the
issuers underlying financial strength. If current levels
of market disruption and volatility continue or worsen, our
ability to access capital as well as our business, financial
condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
BankAtlantic
Bancorp services its debt and pays dividends primarily from
dividends from BankAtlantic, which are subject to regulatory
limits.
BankAtlantic Bancorp is a holding company and dividends from
BankAtlantic represent a significant portion of its cash flows.
BankAtlantic Bancorp uses dividends from BankAtlantic to service
its debt obligations and to pay dividends on its capital stock.
BankAtlantics ability to pay dividends or make other
capital distributions to BankAtlantic Bancorp is subject to
regulatory limitations and the authority of the OTS and the FDIC.
Generally, BankAtlantic may make a capital distribution without
prior OTS approval in an amount equal to BankAtlantics net
income for the current calendar year to date, plus retained net
income for the previous two years, provided that BankAtlantic
does not become under-capitalized as a result of the
distribution. However, at December 31, 2008,
BankAtlantic had a retained net deficit and therefore is
required to obtain approval from the OTS in order to make
capital distributions to BankAtlantic Bancorp.
Due to BankAtlantics recent net losses, BankAtlantic
suspended dividends to BankAtlantic Bancorp in December 2008. In
addition, if BankAtlantic participates in the CPP, its ability
to pay dividends to BankAtlantic Bancorp in the future will be
subject to the restrictions contained in that program. In
February 2009, BankAtlantic Bancorp notified the trustees
under its trust preferred junior subordinated debentures that it
was electing to defer quarterly interest payments, which it has
the right to do without default or penalty for up to twenty
consecutive quarters. During the deferral period, the Company is
not permitted to pay dividends on its common stock.
Notwithstanding the deferral, BankAtlantic Bancorp will continue
to recognize a liability for the interest accrued and will be
required to accrue interest on the deferred interest. At
December 31, 2008, BankAtlantic Bancorp had approximately
$294.2 million of indebtedness outstanding under the trust
preferred junior subordinated debentures at the holding company
level with maturities ranging
46
from 2032 through 2037. The aggregate annual interest payments
on this indebtedness were approximately $18 million based
on interest rates at December 31, 2008 and is generally
indexed to three-month LIBOR. BankAtlantic Bancorps
financial condition would be adversely affected if interest
payments were deferred for a prolonged time period.
BankAtlantic
Bancorp is controlled by BFC Financial Corporation and its
controlling shareholders and this control position may adversely
affect the market price of BankAtlantic Bancorps
Class A common stock.
As of December 31, 2008, BFC Financial Corporation
(BFC) owned all of the Companys issued and
outstanding Class B common stock and 2,389,697 shares,
or approximately 23%, of the Companys issued and
outstanding Class A common stock. BFCs holdings
represent approximately 59% of the Companys total voting
power. Additionally, Alan B. Levan, our Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer, and John E. Abdo, our Vice Chairman,
beneficially own shares of BFCs Class A and
Class B common stock representing approximately 73.8% of
BFCs total voting power. The Companys Class A
common stock and Class B common stock vote as a single
group on most matters. Accordingly, BFC, directly, and
Messrs. Levan and Abdo, indirectly through BFC, are in a
position to control the Company, elect the Companys Board
of Directors and significantly influence the outcome of any
shareholder vote, except in those limited circumstances where
Florida law mandates that the holders of the Companys
Class A common stock vote as a separate class. This control
position may have an adverse effect on the market price of the
Companys Class A common stock.
47
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This joint proxy statement/prospectus contains certain
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with respect to the
financial condition, results of operations, business strategies,
operating efficiencies or synergies, competitive positions,
growth opportunities, plans and objectives of management,
markets for the equity and debt securities of BFC and
Woodbridge, the merger and the effects thereof (if consummated)
upon BFC and Woodbridge and other matters. Statements in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus that are not historical facts
are identified as forward-looking statements for the
purpose of the safe harbor provided by Section 21E of the
Exchange Act and Section 27A of the Securities Act. These
forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, those
relating to the future business prospects, revenues and income
and the merger and the effects thereof (if consummated), in each
case relating to BFC or Woodbridge, wherever they occur in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus, reflect the judgment of the
senior management of BFC or Woodbridge, respectively, and
involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those suggested by the
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements
should, therefore, be considered in light of various important
factors, including those set forth in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. Important factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from estimates or projections
contained in the forward-looking statements include, without
limitation, those factors described in the section of this joint
proxy statement/prospectus entitled Risk Factors.
Words such as estimate, project,
anticipate, plan, intend,
expect, believe and similar expressions
are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements are found at various places
throughout this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Readers are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. Readers also should understand that it is
not possible to predict or identify all such factors and that
the risks and uncertainties contained should not be considered a
complete statement of all potential risks and uncertainties.
Readers should also realize that if underlying assumptions prove
inaccurate or unknown risks or uncertainties materialize, actual
results could vary materially from BFCs or
Woodbridges projections. BFC and Woodbridge undertake no
obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result
of future events or developments.
48
THE BFC
SPECIAL MEETING
General
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is being provided to
BFCs shareholders as part of a solicitation of proxies by
the board of directors of BFC for use at a special meeting of
BFCs shareholders.
Date,
Time and Place
The special meeting of BFCs shareholders will be held on
September 21, 2009 at 11:30 a.m., local time, at the
Corporate Center, 2100 West Cypress Creek Road, Fort
Lauderdale, Florida 33309.
Purpose
of the Meeting
The sole purpose of the meeting is to consider and vote upon a
proposal to approve the merger and the transactions related
thereto, including the amendment of BFCs Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the number of
authorized shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock from
100,000,000 shares to 150,000,000 shares.
Recommendation
of the Board of Directors of BFC
For the reasons described in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, including the opinion of BFCs
financial advisor, the board of directors of BFC has determined
that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby are advisable, fair to and in the best interests of BFC
and its shareholders and, accordingly, has approved the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and
recommends that BFCs shareholders vote FOR the
merger and the related transactions. See The
Merger Recommendation of the BFC Board and Its
Reasons for the Merger.
Record
Date; Shares Entitled to Vote; Quorum
Only shareholders of record of BFC at the close of business on
August 18, 2009, the record date for the BFC special
meeting, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting
and any adjournment or postponement thereof. On the BFC record
date, 38,275,112 shares of BFCs Class A Common
Stock and 6,854,381 shares of BFCs Class B
Common Stock were issued and outstanding. A complete list of
BFCs shareholders of record will be open for examination
by any shareholder of record at BFCs corporate offices,
2100 West Cypress Creek Road, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
33309, during regular business hours for a period of no less
than ten days prior to the meeting. The list will also be
available for examination by any shareholder of record present
at the meeting.
BFCs shareholders will vote together as a single class on
the merger and the related transactions. Each share of
BFCs Class A Common Stock entitles the holder thereof
to one vote on the proposal, with all such shares representing
in the aggregate 22% of the general voting power of BFC. The
number of votes represented by each share of BFCs
Class B Common Stock, which represents in the aggregate 78%
of the general voting power of BFC, is calculated in accordance
with BFCs Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation.
At the BFC special meeting, each outstanding share of BFCs
Class B Common Stock will be entitled to 19.7979 votes on
the merger and the related transactions.
A quorum will be present at the BFC special meeting if shares of
BFCs Class A Common Stock and Class B Common
Stock representing a majority of BFCs total voting power
outstanding on the BFC record date are represented, in person or
by proxy, at the meeting. In the event that a quorum is not
present, it is expected that the meeting will be adjourned to
solicit additional proxies. Broker non-votes and
abstentions will be counted for the purpose of establishing a
quorum at the meeting.
Vote
Required to Approve the Merger and the Related
Transactions
The proposal to approve the merger and the related transactions
will be approved if it receives the affirmative vote of a
majority of the votes entitled to be cast on such proposal. In
the absence of instructions
49
from the beneficial owners of shares of BFCs Class A
Common Stock and Class B Common Stock, brokers, banks and
other nominees will not have discretionary voting authority with
respect to the vote on the merger and the related transactions.
Shares represented by such broker non-votes,
failures to vote and abstentions will have the same effect as
votes against the merger and the related transactions.
Alan B. Levan, BFCs Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
President, and John E. Abdo, BFCs Vice Chairman,
collectively own, directly or indirectly, and are entitled to
vote approximately 27.7% of the outstanding shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock and approximately 86.3% of the
outstanding shares of BFCs Class B Common Stock,
representing approximately 73.4% of the total voting power of
BFC. Messrs. Levan and Abdo have indicated their intention
to vote their shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock in favor of the merger and the related
transactions, and if their shares are voted as indicated, then
the approval of the merger and the related transactions by
BFCs shareholders would be assured.
Shares
Owned by Directors and Executive Officers of BFC
BFCs directors and executive officers and their respective
affiliates collectively own and are entitled to vote
10,724,118 shares, or approximately 28.0%, of BFCs
Class A Common Stock, and 5,912,570 shares, or
approximately 86.3%, of BFCs Class B Common Stock.
These shares represent, in the aggregate, approximately 73.4% of
the general voting power of BFC.
Voting by
Proxy
BFCs shareholders may vote their shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock by
proxy. The method of voting by proxy differs for shares held as
a record holder and shares held in street name. A
proxy card is enclosed for the use of BFCs shareholders of
record and voting instructions are included on such proxy card.
BFCs shareholders of record may vote by completing, dating
and signing the enclosed proxy card and promptly returning it in
the enclosed, pre-addressed, postage-paid envelope or otherwise
transmitting their voting instructions as described on the proxy
card. Shareholders of BFC who hold their shares in street
name, which means such shares are held of record by a
broker, bank or other nominee, will receive instructions from
their brokers, banks or other nominees that such shareholders
must follow in order to vote their shares. A street
name holders failure to provide voting instructions
to his, her or its broker, bank or other nominee will result in
a broker non-vote for those shares, and such
broker non-votes will have the same effect as votes
against the merger and the related transactions. All properly
signed proxies that are received prior to the BFC special
meeting and that are not revoked will be voted at the meeting
according to the instructions indicated on the proxies or, if no
direction is indicated, FOR the merger and the
related transactions.
Voting in
Person
Shareholders of record of BFC that plan to attend the BFC
special meeting and wish to vote in person will be given a
ballot at the meeting. It should be noted, however, that
street name holders who wish to vote their shares in
person at the BFC special meeting must bring to the meeting
proxies from the record holders of the shares authorizing the
shareholder to vote in person at the meeting.
BFCs shareholders should submit their proxies or otherwise
provide their voting instructions even if they plan to attend
the meeting. Record holders and street name holders
who received proxies to vote their shares in person can always
change their votes at the meeting.
The votes of all shareholders of BFC are important.
Accordingly, all shareholders of BFC should sign and return the
enclosed proxy card or otherwise transmit their voting
instructions as described on the proxy card, whether or not they
plan to attend the BFC special meeting in person.
50
Revocation
of Proxies
A BFC shareholder of record may revoke his, her or its proxy at
any time before such proxy is voted at the BFC special meeting
by taking any of the following actions:
|
|
|
|
|
delivering to BFCs Secretary a signed, written notice of
revocation bearing a date later than the date of the previously
executed proxy, stating that the proxy is revoked;
|
|
|
|
signing and delivering a new proxy, relating to the same shares
and bearing a later date, or transmitting new voting
instructions by telephone or internet as described on the proxy
card; or
|
|
|
|
attending the meeting and voting in person, although attendance
at the meeting will not, by itself, revoke a proxy.
|
If a shareholder of BFC holds his, her or its shares in
street name, the options described in the paragraph
above do not apply. Instead, such shareholder must contact his,
her or its broker, bank or other nominee to find out how to
change his, her or its vote.
Proxy
Solicitation
BFC is soliciting proxies for the special meeting of its
shareholders. BFC will bear the entire cost of soliciting
proxies from its shareholders, except that BFC and Woodbridge
have each agreed to share equally all expenses incurred in
connection with the printing, mailing and filing with the SEC of
this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the registration
statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus is a
part. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by mail, BFC
will request that brokers, banks and other nominees send proxies
and proxy materials to BFCs beneficial shareholders and
secure their voting instructions, if necessary. BFC will
reimburse those record holders for their reasonable expenses in
so doing. Additionally, BFC and Woodbridge have engaged
Georgeson Inc., a proxy solicitation firm, to assist in the
solicitation of proxies from their respective shareholders with
respect to the merger. BFC and Woodbridge have agreed to pay
Georgeson Inc. customary fees for its services, as well as
reimburse Georgeson Inc. for its out of pocket expenses for such
items as mailing, copying, phone calls, faxes and other related
matters, and indemnify Georgeson Inc. against any losses arising
out of its proxy soliciting services. BFC also may use its
directors, officers and other employees, who will not be
specially compensated, to solicit proxies from BFCs
shareholders, either personally or by telephone, the Internet,
telegram, facsimile or special delivery letter.
Other
Business
No matter other than the proposal relating to the merger and the
related transactions, including the amendment to BFCs
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation increasing the
number of authorized shares of BFCs Class A Common
Stock from 100,000,000 shares to 150,000,000 shares,
may be brought before the BFC special meeting.
Assistance
If you are a shareholder of BFC and you need assistance in
completing your proxy card or otherwise providing your voting
instructions, or if you have questions regarding the BFC special
meeting or the merger, please call the information agent for the
merger, Georgeson Inc., toll-free at (888) 666-2593.
BFCs shareholders may also contact BFC Financial
Corporation, Attn: Investor Relations by mail at 2100 West
Cypress Creek Road, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 or by
telephone at
(954) 940-4994.
51
THE
WOODBRIDGE ANNUAL MEETING
General
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is being provided to
Woodbridges shareholders as part of a solicitation of
proxies by the board of directors of Woodbridge for use at
Woodbridges 2009 annual meeting of shareholders.
Date,
Time and Place
Woodbridges 2009 annual meeting of shareholders will be
held on September 21, 2009 at 12:00 p.m., local time,
at the Corporate Center, 2100 West Cypress Creek Road, Fort
Lauderdale, Florida 33309.
Purposes
of the Woodbridge Annual Meeting
The purposes of the Woodbridge annual meeting are:
1. To consider and vote upon a proposal to approve the
merger agreement.
2. To consider and vote upon a proposal to elect three
directors to the board of directors of Woodbridge to serve until
the earlier of Woodbridges 2012 annual meeting of
shareholders and the consummation of the merger.
3. To transact such other business as may properly be
brought before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement
thereof.
Recommendation
of the Board of Directors of Woodbridge
For the reasons described in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, including the recommendation of
Woodbridges special committee and the opinion of
Woodbridges financial advisor, the board of directors of
Woodbridge has determined that the merger and the other
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement are advisable,
fair to and in the best interests of Woodbridges
shareholders and, accordingly, has approved the merger agreement
and the transactions contemplated thereby and recommends that
Woodbridges shareholders vote FOR the approval
of the merger agreement. See The Merger
Recommendation of the Woodbridge Board and Its Reasons for the
Merger.
The board of directors of Woodbridge recommends that
Woodbridges shareholders vote FOR all of the
nominees for director.
Record
Date; Shares Entitled to Vote; Quorum
Only shareholders of record of Woodbridge at the close of
business on August 18, 2009, the record date for the
Woodbridge annual meeting, are entitled to notice of, and to
vote at, the meeting and any adjournment or postponement
thereof. On the Woodbridge record date, 16,637,132 shares
of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock were issued and
outstanding. In addition, on the Woodbridge record date,
243,807 shares of Woodbridges Class B Common
Stock were issued and outstanding, all of which were owned by
BFC. A complete list of Woodbridges shareholders of record
will be open for examination by any shareholder of record at
Woodbridges corporate offices, 2100 West Cypress
Creek Road, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309, during regular
business hours for a period of no less than ten days prior to
the Woodbridge annual meeting. The list will also be available
for examination by any shareholder of record present at the
Woodbridge annual meeting.
Holders of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock are entitled to vote as one class on
each of the proposal relating to the merger agreement and the
proposal relating to the election of directors. Holders of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock are entitled to one
vote per share owned on each proposal, with all such shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock representing in the
aggregate 53% of Woodbridges general voting power. The
number of votes represented by each share of Woodbridges
Class B Common Stock, which represents in the aggregate 47%
of the general voting power of Woodbridge, is
52
calculated in accordance with Woodbridges Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation. At the Woodbridge annual
meeting, each outstanding share of Woodbridges
Class B Common Stock will be entitled to 60.5138 votes on
each proposal.
A quorum will be present at the Woodbridge annual meeting if
shares of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock representing a majority of the voting
power of Woodbridge outstanding on the Woodbridge record date
are represented, in person or by proxy, at the meeting. In the
event that a quorum is not present, it is expected that the
meeting will be adjourned to solicit additional proxies.
Broker non-votes and abstentions will be counted for
the purpose of establishing a quorum at the meeting.
Vote
Required to Approve the Merger Agreement
Under the FBCA, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes
entitled to be cast by holders of Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock and Class B Common Stock, voting together as a
single class, is required to approve the merger agreement. In
the absence of instructions from the beneficial owners of shares
of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock, brokers, banks
and other nominees will not have discretionary voting authority
with respect to the approval of the merger agreement. Shares
represented by such broker non-votes, abstentions
and failures to vote will have the same effect as votes against
the approval of the merger agreement.
BFC is the owner of approximately 22% of the outstanding shares
of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock and all of the
outstanding shares of Woodbridges Class B Common
Stock, and these shares represent in the aggregate 59% of
Woodbridges total voting power. BFC has agreed to vote its
shares of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock in favor of the approval of the merger
agreement and, accordingly, approval of the merger agreement by
Woodbridges shareholders is assured. It is also
anticipated that BFCs directors and executive officers,
who collectively own less than 1% of the outstanding shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock (other than the
shares beneficially owned through BFC), will vote their shares
of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock in favor of the
approval of the merger agreement although they are not required
to do so.
Vote
Required to Approve the Election of Directors
The affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes cast at the
Woodbridge annual meeting is required to approve the election of
directors. In the absence of instructions from the beneficial
owners of shares of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock,
brokers, banks and other nominees will have discretionary voting
authority with respect to the vote on the election of directors.
Broker non-votes, failures to vote and abstentions
will have no effect on the election of directors.
Shares
Owned by Directors and Executive Officers of
Woodbridge
Woodbridges directors and executive officers and their
respective affiliates, which includes BFC, collectively own and
are entitled to vote 3,848,530 shares, or approximately
23.1%, of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock. BFC
beneficially owns all of the outstanding shares of
Woodbridges Class B Common Stock.
Voting by
Proxy
Woodbridges shareholders may vote their shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock and Class B
Common Stock by proxy. The method of voting by proxy differs for
shares held as a record holder and shares held in street
name. A proxy card is enclosed for the use of
Woodbridges shareholders of record and voting instructions
are included on such proxy card. Woodbridges shareholders
of record may vote by completing, dating and signing the
enclosed proxy card and promptly returning it in the enclosed,
pre-addressed, postage-paid envelope or otherwise transmitting
their voting instructions as described on the proxy card.
Shareholders of Woodbridge who hold their shares in street
name, which means such shares are held of record by a
broker, bank or other nominee, will receive instructions from
their brokers, banks or other nominees that such shareholders
must follow in order to vote their shares. The failure of
street name holders to provide voting instructions
to their brokers, banks or other nominees will result in
broker non-votes for those shares, and
53
such broker non-votes will count as votes against
the approval of the merger agreement. However, in the absence of
instructions from the beneficial owners of shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock, brokers, banks and
other nominees will have discretionary voting authority with
respect to the vote on the election of directors. All properly
signed proxies that are received prior to the Woodbridge annual
meeting and that are not revoked will be voted at the Woodbridge
annual meeting according to the instructions indicated on the
proxies or, if no direction is indicated, FOR the
approval of the merger agreement and FOR each of the
nominees for director.
Voting in
Person; Directions to the Woodbridge Annual Meeting
Shareholders of record of Woodbridge that plan to attend the
Woodbridge annual meeting and wish to vote in person will be
given a ballot at the meeting. It should be noted, however, that
a shareholder of Woodbridge who holds his, her or its shares in
street name and wishes to vote at the Woodbridge
annual meeting must bring to the meeting proxies from the record
holders of the shares authorizing the shareholder to vote in
person at the meeting.
Shareholders who wish to attend the Woodbridge annual meeting
may contact Woodbridges Investor Relations department at
(954) 940-4995
for directions. Shareholders of Woodbridge should submit their
proxies or otherwise provide their voting instructions even if
they plan to attend the meeting. Shareholders of record and
street name holders who have obtained proxies to
vote their shares in person can always change their votes at the
meeting.
The votes of all shareholders of Woodbridge are important.
Accordingly, all shareholders of Woodbridge should sign and
return the enclosed proxy card or otherwise transmit their
voting instructions as described on the proxy card, whether or
not they plan to attend the Woodbridge annual meeting in
person.
Revocation
of Proxies
A Woodbridge shareholder of record may revoke his, her or its
proxy at any time before such proxy is voted at the Woodbridge
annual meeting by taking any of the following actions:
|
|
|
|
|
delivering to Woodbridges Secretary a signed, written
notice of revocation bearing a date later than the date of the
previously executed proxy, stating that the proxy is revoked;
|
|
|
|
signing and delivering a new proxy, relating to the same shares
and bearing a later date, or transmitting new voting
instructions by telephone or internet as described on the proxy
card; or
|
|
|
|
attending the Woodbridge annual meeting and voting in person,
although attendance at the Woodbridge annual meeting will not,
by itself, revoke a proxy.
|
If a shareholder of Woodbridge holds his, her or its shares in
street name, however, the options described in the
paragraph above do not apply. Instead, such shareholder must
contact his, her or its broker, bank or other nominee to find
out how to change his, her or its vote.
Proxy
Solicitation
Woodbridge is soliciting proxies for its 2009 annual meeting of
shareholders. Woodbridge will bear the entire cost of soliciting
proxies from its shareholders, except that BFC and Woodbridge
have each agreed to share equally all expenses incurred in
connection with the printing, mailing and filing with the SEC of
this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the registration
statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus is a
part. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by mail,
Woodbridge will request that brokers, banks and other nominees
send proxies and proxy materials to Woodbridges beneficial
shareholders and secure their voting instructions, if necessary.
Woodbridge will reimburse those record holders for their
reasonable expenses in so doing. Additionally, Woodbridge and
BFC have engaged Georgeson Inc., a proxy solicitation firm, to
assist in the solicitation of proxies from their respective
shareholders with respect to the merger. Woodbridge and BFC have
agreed to pay Georgeson Inc. customary fees for its services, as
well as reimburse Georgeson Inc. for its out of pocket expenses
for such items as mailing, copying, phone calls, faxes and other
related
54
matters, and indemnify Georgeson Inc. against any losses
arising out of its proxy soliciting services. Woodbridge also
may use its directors, officers and other employees, who will
not be specially compensated, to solicit proxies from
Woodbridges shareholders, either personally or by
telephone, the Internet, telegram, facsimile or special delivery
letter.
Other
Business
Woodbridge does not expect that any matter other than the
proposals presented in this joint proxy statement/prospectus
will be brought before the Woodbridge annual meeting. However,
if other matters are properly presented at the meeting or any
adjournment or postponement thereof, the persons named as
proxies will vote in accordance with their best judgment with
respect to those matters.
Assistance
If you are a shareholder of Woodbridge and you need assistance
in completing your proxy card or otherwise providing your voting
instructions, or if you have questions regarding the Woodbridge
annual meeting or the merger, please call the information agent
for the merger, Georgeson Inc., toll-free at
(877) 255-0124.
Woodbridges shareholders may also contact Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation, Attn: Investor Relations by mail at
2100 West Cypress Creek Road, Fort Lauderdale, FL
33309 or by telephone at
(954) 940-4995.
55
THE
MERGER
General
The boards of directors of BFC and Woodbridge have each approved
the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.
Upon consummation of the merger, Woodbridge will merge with and
into Merger Sub, a wholly owned subsidiary of BFC. Merger Sub
will be the surviving company (the Surviving
Company) and will remain a wholly owned subsidiary of BFC.
Under the terms of the merger agreement, holders of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock (other than BFC and
holders who exercise and perfect their appraisal rights) will be
entitled to receive 3.47 shares of BFCs Class A
Common Stock in exchange for each share of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock owned by such holders.
The terms and conditions of the merger are contained in the
merger agreement, which is attached as Annex A to this
joint proxy statement/prospectus. Please carefully read the
merger agreement, as it is the legal document that governs the
merger.
Background
of the Merger
BFCs management and board of directors are focused on the
companys long-term strategic goals and, when appropriate,
consider various strategic opportunities in order to maximize
shareholder value. BFC believes that the best potential for
growth is likely through the growth of the companies it
currently controls and its focus is to provide overall support
for its controlled subsidiaries with a view to the improved
performance of the organization as a whole.
Woodbridges operations are concentrated in the real estate
industry and its primary activities currently relate to the
development of master planned communities through its Core
Communities subsidiary and its ownership position in Bluegreen.
Like other companies involved in the real estate industry,
Woodbridge has been adversely affected by the severe and
prolonged downturn in the real estate market and the economy in
general. As a result, over the past few years, Woodbridge has
pursued opportunities to diversify its activities.
On January 30, 2007, BFC and Woodbridge (then Levitt
Corporation) entered into a definitive agreement (the 2007
agreement) pursuant to which Woodbridge was to merge with
and into and become a wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC, and
holders of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock (other
than BFC) were to receive 2.27 shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock for each share of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock that they held. However, based on
then-current circumstances, the conditions to closing the
proposed merger could not in BFCs opinion be satisfied
and, by letter dated August 14, 2007, BFC terminated the
2007 agreement.
In connection with the proposed merger between the companies in
2007, the boards of directors of BFC and Woodbridge, with the
assistance of their respective legal and financial advisors,
conducted extensive negotiations over a three-month period
regarding the terms and conditions of the 2007 agreement and
reviewed extensive information regarding the companies
respective businesses. Further, because Woodbridge is a
subsidiary of BFC that is consolidated in BFCs financial
statements, BFCs board of directors regularly reviews
information regarding Woodbridges business, financial
condition, operating results and prospects, including the issues
Woodbridge has faced during the sustained downturn in the real
estate and financial markets over the last two years.
Consistent with its focus on providing overall support for its
controlled subsidiaries, BFCs board of directors regularly
discusses possible ways to maximize the utilization of assets
and resources within the consolidated organization based on its
assessment of the financial condition, cash requirements and
prospects of its subsidiaries. Beginning in 2009, these
discussions focused on the possibility and potential benefits of
a strategic transaction between BFC and Woodbridge.
At a meeting of Woodbridges board of directors held on
April 27, 2009, Alan B. Levan, Chairman of the boards of
directors of both BFC and Woodbridge, advised the members of
Woodbridges board of directors of BFCs potential
interest in re-establishing discussions with Woodbridge
regarding a possible merger of equals between the two companies.
Mr. Levan also discussed, and answered questions from
Woodbridges directors
56
regarding, his view of the potential benefits of such a
transaction to both Woodbridge and BFC, including that BFC has
no debt at its parent company level and potentially greater
access to financial resources than Woodbridge and that the
merger would create a combined company with greater market
capitalization than either company on a stand-alone basis and
would potentially benefit shareholders of both companies by
increasing the visibility and trading liquidity of BFCs
Class A Common Stock. Mr. Levan also noted the limited
business integration risks of a transaction between BFC and
Woodbridge due to the preexisting relationships between the
companies and the fact that the merger would likely result in
decreased legal and accounting fees for the combined company.
Based on this discussion, Woodbridges board of directors
indicated its willingness to further explore a potential
transaction with BFC and, as a result, Mr. Levan indicated
that he would further discuss with BFCs board of directors
a potential transaction between the two companies with a view to
presenting a more specific proposal.
On May 8, 2009, BFCs board of directors held a
meeting where it discussed whether, and upon what terms, a
potential transaction should be proposed to Woodbridge.
BFCs directors discussed the material aspects of the
proposal, which contemplated, among other things, a merger of
equals in which BFC would acquire Woodbridge in a
stock-for-stock transaction with an exchange ratio of
3.47 shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock for
each share of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock (other
than shares of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock owned
by BFC). The exchange ratio was based on the book value of BFC
and Woodbridge at March 31, 2009, and would result in
Woodbridges shareholders, other than BFC, holding an
approximate 50% equity ownership interest in BFC following the
merger. BFCs board of directors also discussed
Woodbridges business, financial condition and cash
position, including the challenges facing Core Communities and
the issues relating to its outstanding indebtedness. BFCs
directors additionally discussed the potential long-term
benefits of the transaction to the companies and the process for
approving and completing the merger, including the retention of
outside legal and financial advisors. After this discussion,
BFCs board of directors authorized Mr. Levan to
submit the merger proposal to Woodbridge. BFCs board of
directors requested that Stearns Weaver, regular outside counsel
to BFC, serve as legal advisor to BFC with respect to the merger.
On May 11, 2009, Woodbridges board of directors held
a meeting to review and discuss BFCs proposal, which was
distributed to Woodbridges directors prior to the meeting.
Mr. Levan described BFCs merger proposal in detail,
including BFCs proposed conditions to completing the
merger and the contemplated percentage that Woodbridges
shareholders would hold in BFC following the merger.
Mr. Levan also answered questions from Woodbridges
directors regarding the proposal and shared with
Woodbridges directors his view of the potential advantages
and disadvantages of the proposed transaction to each of the
companies. It was then decided that the independent directors
would convene an executive session to further discuss BFCs
proposal and, if the independent directors determined that it
was advisable to further consider the proposal, to form a
special committee to pursue a transaction and take all actions
that it deemed necessary, including the hiring of independent
legal and financial advisors. During that executive session,
Woodbridges independent directors expressed their interest
in continuing discussions and negotiations with respect to a
transaction with BFC. As a result, a special committee of
Woodbridges independent directors was formed, and
Messrs. Joel Levy, Blosser, Kahn, Alan Levy and Nicholson,
representing all of the independent directors of Woodbridge,
were appointed to the committee. Mr. Joel Levy was
subsequently appointed Chairman of the special committee.
Messrs. Dornbush and Scherer were subsequently designated
as non-voting members of the special committee and agreed to
work as advisors to the special committee as requested.
On May 13, 2009, Woodbridges special committee held a
meeting for the purpose of discussing the proposed merger with
BFC and determining how to proceed with respect to the merger.
The special committee determined to engage, and discussed the
qualifications of potential firms to engage as, independent
legal counsel and independent financial advisor to assist the
special committee with respect to the merger. The special
committee also reviewed and discussed information relating to
the evaluation process undertaken with respect to the proposed
merger between Woodbridge and BFC in 2007 in order to assist the
special committee in its process of evaluating the currently
proposed merger between the companies.
On May 15, 2009, Woodbridges special committee held a
meeting at which it approved the engagement of Akerman
Senterfitt, P.A. (Akerman) as independent legal
counsel. The special committee selected
57
Akerman based on its experience with respect to merger and
acquisition transactions and its knowledge of Florida law,
specifically as it may relate to the merger. Akerman discussed
generally with the members of the special committee the purpose
of the special committee, the process and procedure of
conducting committee meetings and the fiduciary and legal duties
that may be applicable to them in connection with their
evaluation of a potential transaction with BFC. Akerman also
discussed with the special committee the provisions of Florida
law applicable to a potential transaction between Woodbridge and
BFC. At the meeting, the special committee also determined to
continue to explore and discussed the qualifications of possible
independent financial advisors. The members of the special
committee additionally discussed their responsibilities on
behalf of the committee and the appropriate compensation to be
paid to them in consideration for their efforts. After this
discussion, the members of the special committee determined to
recommend to Woodbridges full board of directors a
proposal for Woodbridge to pay a fee of $15,000 to each member
of the special committee other than Messrs. Dornbush and
Scherer, who would not be compensated for their service as
non-voting members of and advisors to the special committee.
On May 18, 2009, Woodbridges board of directors held
a meeting. At the meeting, Mr. Joel Levy, as the Chairman
of the special committee, updated Woodbridges full board
of directors on the status of the process related to the
proposed merger, including the status of the special
committees engagement of independent legal and financial
advisors with respect to the merger. At the meeting,
Woodbridges board of directors also discussed at length
and approved without modification the proposal relating to the
compensation to be paid to the members of the special committee.
Following the board meeting on May 18, 2009 and again on
each of May 20 and May 22, 2009, the special committee met
to consider and discuss candidates to serve as the
committees independent financial advisor. At the meeting
held on May 22, 2009, the special committee preliminarily
determined that, based on the special committees view of
the importance of BankAtlantic Bancorps results to the
consolidated financial condition of BFC and Ewings
reputation and expertise in assessing and analyzing financial
institutions generally, and thrifts in particular, it should
meet with Ewing to determine whether to engage Ewing as the
committees independent financial advisor.
On May 26, 2009, the special committee held a meeting
attended by representatives of Ewing and Akerman. At the
meeting, the representatives of Ewing discussed with the members
of the special committee Ewings experience and
qualifications, and specifically its expertise in assessing and
analyzing financial institutions generally, and thrifts in
particular. The members of the special committee also discussed
with Ewings representatives the terms of the proposed
engagement letter between Ewing and the special committee (on
behalf of Woodbridge), a copy of which was distributed to the
members of the special committee prior to the meeting. Following
this discussion, the representatives of Ewing left the meeting
so that the members of the special committee could discuss among
themselves Ewings qualifications and the advisability of
engaging Ewing to serve as the committees independent
financial advisor. After further discussions and considerations,
the special committee determined to engage Ewing as its
independent financial advisor with respect to the merger. The
members of the special committee then discussed with Akerman the
status of the merger as well as the terms and conditions of
BFCs proposal, including the condition which gives BFC the
right to terminate the merger agreement if more than 10% of the
holders of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock exercise,
or, immediately prior to the effective time of the merger,
remain entitled to exercise, their appraisal rights.
On June 1, 2009, BFCs board of directors held a
meeting. At the meeting, Stearns Weaver discussed generally with
BFCs directors the relationships of Messrs. Levan and
Abdo to both BFC and Woodbridge and the fiduciary and legal
duties that may be applicable to BFCs directors in
connection with their evaluation and negotiation of a
transaction between BFC and Woodbridge. Following this
discussion, Mr. Levan advised BFCs directors that the
merger proposal was presented to Woodbridges board of
directors, who subsequently indicated its interest in pursuing
discussions regarding the proposal. Mr. Levan reported that
a special committee comprised of Woodbridges independent
directors was formed to preside over Woodbridges process
in evaluating and pursuing a transaction with BFC and that the
special committee had engaged Akerman as its independent legal
counsel and Ewing as its independent financial advisor.
Mr. Levan then informed BFCs directors that Ewing had
commenced its due diligence process.
58
During June 2009, Ewing conducted its due diligence review of
BFC and its subsidiary, BankAtlantic Bancorp, and analyzed the
fairness of the proposed merger consideration to
Woodbridges shareholders.
On June 15, 2009, Woodbridges board of directors held
a meeting. At the meeting, Woodbridges directors discussed
the status of the proposed transaction between BFC and
Woodbridge, including the status of Ewings due diligence
review and analysis of BFC and BankAtlantic Bancorp.
On June 23, 2009, Stearns Weaver sent a preliminary draft
of the merger agreement to Akerman. Thereafter,
Woodbridges special committee and BFCs board of
directors, through their legal and financial advisors, discussed
and negotiated the terms of the proposed merger agreement.
On June 24, 2009, Woodbridges special committee held
a meeting at which, among other things, Ewing provided the
committee with a preliminary report as to its views with respect
to Woodbridge, BFC and BankAtlantic Bancorp. Ewing discussed its
methodology in reviewing BankAtlantic Bancorp and in determining
the relative valuations of BFC and Woodbridge. In particular,
Ewing concluded that book value, which is the basis for the
proposed exchange ratio, was the appropriate methodology for
determining the relative values of the two companies.
On June 25, 2009, BFCs board of directors held a
meeting to discuss the status of the proposed merger. The
members of BFCs board of directors were updated on the
progress of the proposed merger, including the status of the
merger agreement as well as Ewings due diligence review of
BFC and BankAtlantic Bancorp. Mr. Levan also discussed with
BFCs board of directors his views of certain of the
potential benefits and risks of the merger, including the risks
relating to Woodbridges and Core Communities
outstanding debt and the possibility of Woodbridge recording
impairment charges relating to Cores assets in the future.
At the meeting, BFCs board of directors also considered
the desirability of engaging a financial advisor to analyze and
issue a fairness opinion with respect to the proposed exchange
ratio and discussed, specifically, the qualifications of JMP
Securities to serve as financial advisor to BFCs board of
directors with respect to the merger. After this discussion,
BFCs board of directors approved the engagement of JMP
Securities as financial advisor to BFCs board of directors
with respect to the merger. BFC selected JMP Securities based on
JMP Securities qualifications, expense and reputation and
its knowledge of the business and affairs of BFC. JMP Securities
thereafter conducted its due diligence review of Woodbridge and
analyzed the fairness of the proposed exchange ratio to
BFCs shareholders.
On June 29, 2009, Woodbridges special committee met
again with Ewing to allow any members of the committee who were
not present at the previous meeting to have the opportunity to
hear, discuss and ask questions regarding Ewings
presentation. The members of the special committee discussed
Ewings presentation and asked, and Ewing answered,
numerous questions regarding Ewings methodology and
preliminary conclusions. After this discussion, the members of
the special committee voted unanimously to preliminarily
recommend approval of the proposed merger with BFC to
Woodbridges full board of directors, subject to the
finalization of Ewings analyses, its receipt of
Ewings fairness opinion and the satisfactory negotiation
of the terms and conditions of the merger agreement (as
discussed with Akerman).
On June 30, 2009, Akerman delivered Woodbridges
special committees initial comments to the merger
agreement to Stearns Weaver, which included, among other things,
the requirement that the no solicitation provisions
of the merger agreement apply to BFC (as well as Woodbridge).
Thereafter, Woodbridges special committee and BFCs
board of directors, through their respective legal and financial
advisors, continued to review, negotiate and discuss the terms
and conditions of the merger agreement and the potential merger.
On July 1, 2009, Stearns Weaver distributed a revised draft
of the merger agreement to Akerman.
On July 2, 2009, BFCs board of directors met with its
legal and financial advisors. A copy of the proposed final draft
of the merger agreement and materials outlining JMP
Securities analysis of the merger and the exchange ratio
had previously been delivered to BFCs board of directors.
At the meeting, BFCs board of directors discussed with its
advisors the proposed final draft of the merger agreement. JMP
Securities presented to BFCs board of directors its
analysis of the exchange ratio. Based on such analysis, JMP
Securities presented to BFCs board of directors a summary
of its written opinion, dated as of July 2, 2009, and
provided an oral opinion that the exchange ratio was, as of that
date, fair from a financial point of view to
59
BFCs shareholders. JMP Securities subsequently provided a
written copy of its fairness opinion. Stearns Weaver reviewed
and discussed with BFCs board of directors the terms,
conditions and provisions of the revised merger agreement.
Messrs. Levan and Abdo and other members of management then
left the meeting so that BFCs independent directors could
discuss the merger and the merger agreement among themselves and
with their legal and financial advisors outside of the presence
of management. A discussion ensued, after which the independent
directors unanimously determined to approve the merger
agreement. At that point, Messrs. Levan and Abdo returned
to the meeting. After further discussions and deliberations,
BFCs board of directors, with Messrs. Levan and Abdo
abstaining, unanimously approved the merger agreement as well as
the merger and the related transactions, and recommended that
BFCs shareholders approve the merger and the related
transactions.
On July 2, 2009, Woodbridges special committee met
with its legal and financial advisors. A copy of the proposed
final draft of the merger agreement and materials outlining
Ewings analysis of the merger had previously been
delivered to the members of the special committee. At the
meeting, Woodbridges special committee discussed with its
advisors the proposed final draft of the merger agreement. Ewing
presented to Woodbridges special committee its analysis of
the exchange ratio and, based on such analysis, Ewing provided
to Woodbridges special committee its oral opinion,
subsequently confirmed in writing and delivered to
Woodbridges special committee, that the consideration to
be received in the merger was, as of that date, fair from a
financial point of view to Woodbridges shareholders. After
discussions and deliberations, Woodbridges special
committee unanimously approved the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby and agreed to recommend that
Woodbridges board of directors approve the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.
On July 2, 2009, following the meeting of Woodbridges
special committee, Woodbridges board of directors met to
consider the merger. A copy of the proposed final draft of the
merger agreement and materials outlining Ewings analysis
of the merger had previously been delivered to each member of
Woodbridges board of directors. At the meeting, Ewing
presented to Woodbridges full board of directors its
analysis of the exchange ratio and its oral opinion that the
consideration to be received in the merger was, as of that date,
fair from a financial point of view to Woodbridges
shareholders. Woodbridges special committee then informed
Woodbridges board of directors of its recommendation to
approve the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby. At that time, Messrs. Levan and Abdo left the
meeting, and Woodbridges non-management directors
discussed the merger and the merger agreement among themselves
and with their legal and financial advisors outside of the
presence of management. Messrs. Levan and Abdo then
returned to the meeting. After additional discussions and
deliberations, Woodbridges board of directors, with
Messrs. Levan and Abdo abstaining, unanimously approved the
merger, the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby, and recommended that Woodbridges shareholders
approve the merger agreement. Woodbridges board of
directors specifically noted that its approval constituted the
approval of Woodbridges disinterested
directors in accordance with the FBCAs
affiliated transaction statute and, therefore,
exempted the merger from the provisions of the FBCAs
control share statute. In connection with its
approval, Woodbridges board of directors also authorized
Woodbridges management to take all actions that it deemed
necessary or desirable relating to the merger, including,
without limitation, to cause Woodbridges shareholder
rights plan to be inapplicable to the merger and to be
terminated as of the effective time of the merger.
The merger agreement was thereafter entered into on July 2,
2009 and publicly announced prior to the opening of the market
on the next trading day, July 6, 2009.
Recommendation
of the BFC Board and its Reasons for the Merger
The board of directors of BFC believes that there are
substantial benefits to BFC and its shareholders that can be
obtained as a result of the merger. Accordingly, the board of
directors of BFC has determined that the merger agreement and
the transactions contemplated thereby are advisable, fair to and
in the best interests of BFC and its shareholders, has approved
the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby,
and recommends that BFCs shareholders vote FOR
the merger and the related transactions.
60
The board of directors of BFC, in reaching its decision to
approve the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby, consulted with JMP Securities, BFCs financial
advisor, and Stearns Weaver, BFCs outside legal counsel,
and considered a variety of material factors weighing positively
in favor of the merger, including, without limitation, the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that, based on BFCs financial portfolio as of
March 31, 2009, upon consummation of the merger, BFC will
realize an increase in BFC shareholders equity from
approximately $104.5 million to approximately
$206.8 million;
|
|
|
|
the fact that, based on share and market price information as of
July 2, 2009, the date of the merger agreement, upon
consummation of the merger, BFC will realize an increase in
unaffiliated public float from approximately 28.5 million
shares to approximately 72.9 million shares and an increase
in global market capitalization from approximately
$18.1 million to approximately $36.0 million;
|
|
|
|
the fact that the merger will result in tax consolidation,
thereby eliminating the potential for double
taxation on BFCs share of Woodbridges earnings;
|
|
|
|
the potential increased visibility and trading liquidity for
BFCs capital stock resulting from the merger;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the efficiencies that could be realized as a result of the
merger in legal, accounting and internal audit fees as well as
fees relating to SEC reporting;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the opinion of JMP Securities, BFCs financial advisor, to
the effect that, as of the date of the opinion, and subject to
and based on the qualifications and assumptions set forth in the
opinion, the exchange ratio was fair, from a financial point of
view, to BFCs shareholders (see The
Merger Opinion of BFCs Financial
Advisor);
|
|
|
|
|
|
the limited business integration risks due to the preexisting
relationships between BFC and Woodbridge, including, without
limitation, management commonality and BFCs long-term
investment in Woodbridge;
|
|
|
|
current financial market conditions and historical market
prices, volatility and trading information with respect to
BFCs Class A Common Stock and Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock; and
|
|
|
|
the belief that the terms of the merger agreement, including the
parties respective representations, warranties and
covenants contained therein, are reasonable.
|
The board of directors of BFC, in reaching its decision to
approve the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby, also considered potential detriments related to the
merger, including, without limitation, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the substantial costs to be incurred in connection with the
merger, including transaction expenses arising from the merger,
whether or not the merger is consummated;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the risks relating to Woodbridges and Core
Communities outstanding debt, including the risk that
certain of such debt may need to be restructured in the near
future (which may not be possible on favorable terms or at all)
and the risk of future impairment charges relating to
Woodbridges assets, and specifically Cores assets;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the risk that the current economic downturn, if prolonged, may
continue to have an adverse impact on Woodbridges
financial condition and operating results;
|
|
|
|
the potential negative impact on BFCs cash flow if a
significant amount of Woodbridges shareholders exercise
their appraisal rights;
|
|
|
|
the risks inherent in the fluctuating market price of BFCs
Class A Common Stock, such as the risk that the value of
the shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock issuable in
connection with merger at the effective time of the merger may
exceed the value of those shares as of the date on which the
board of directors of BFC approved the merger;
|
|
|
|
possible disruptions to BFCs operations and management
distractions that could arise from the merger;
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
the possibility that the expected benefits from the merger
described above may not be realized;
|
|
|
|
the limitations imposed in the merger agreement on the
solicitation or consideration by BFC of alternative business
combinations prior to the consummation of the merger;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the interests that certain executive officers and directors of
BFC have with respect to the merger in addition to their
interests as shareholders of BFC generally, as described under
The Merger Interests of Certain Persons in the
Merger; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
various other risks associated with the merger set forth under
the section entitled Risk Factors.
|
After consideration of these material factors, the board of
directors of BFC determined that the potential benefits of the
merger and the related transactions outweighed the potential
risks of the merger and the related transactions.
This discussion of the information and factors considered by the
board of directors of BFC is not intended to be exhaustive and
may not include all of the factors considered by the board of
directors of BFC. In reaching its determination to approve the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and
recommend to BFCs shareholders that they approve the
merger and the related transactions, the board of directors of
BFC did not quantify or assign any relative or specific weights
to the various factors that it considered. Rather, the board of
directors of BFC viewed its determination and recommendation as
being based on an overall analysis and on the totality of the
information presented to and factors considered by it. In
addition, in considering the factors described above, individual
members of the board of directors of BFC may have given
different weight to different factors or taken into account
other factors. After considering this information, the board of
directors of BFC approved the merger agreement and the
transactions contemplated thereby and recommends that BFCs
shareholders approve the merger and the related transactions.
Role and
Recommendation of Woodbridges Special Committee
The board of directors of Woodbridge designated a special
committee comprised solely of independent directors to, among
other things, negotiate, review and evaluate the terms and
conditions of the merger agreement and determine the
advisability of the merger. The special committee negotiated the
terms and conditions of the merger agreement on behalf of
Woodbridge and, after careful review and consideration,
determined that the merger is advisable, fair to and in the best
interests of Woodbridges shareholders. The special
committee therefore recommended that the board of directors of
Woodbridge approve the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby and recommend to the shareholders of
Woodbridge that they approve the merger agreement.
The special committee was aware of the interests of certain
officers and directors of Woodbridge in the merger, as described
under The Merger Interests of Certain Persons
in the Merger, including the fact that the merger
agreement contemplates that the members of the special committee
are to be appointed to the board of directors of BFC in
connection with the merger.
In arriving at its determination, the special committee
consulted with Woodbridges senior management, as well as
Akerman Senterfitt, outside legal counsel to the Woodbridge
special committee, and Ewing, Woodbridges financial
advisor, with respect to strategic, operational, legal,
regulatory and other matters. In arriving at its determination,
the special committee also independently considered the factors
described below in The Merger Recommendation
of the Woodbridge Board and its Reasons for the Merger. In
light of the number and wide variety of factors considered in
connection with its evaluation of the merger, the special
committee did not consider it practicable to, and did not
attempt to, quantify, rank or otherwise assign relative weights
to the specific factors considered in reaching its
determination. The special committee viewed its determination
and recommendation as being based on all of the information
available and the factors presented to and considered by it. In
addition, individual directors serving on the special committee
may have given different weight to different factors.
62
Recommendation
of the Woodbridge Board and Its Reasons for the Merger
After considering the recommendation of Woodbridges
special committee and the other factors discussed below and
consulting with Ewing, Woodbridges financial advisor, the
board of directors of Woodbridge determined that the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby are
advisable, fair to and in the best interests of
Woodbridges shareholders, has approved the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, and
recommends that Woodbridges shareholders vote
FOR the approval of the merger agreement. In
reaching this determination, the board of directors of
Woodbridge considered a variety of material factors weighing
positively in favor of the merger, including, without
limitation, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that shareholders of Woodbridge (other than BFC) will
own approximately 54% of the outstanding shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock and approximately 50% of BFCs
total common equity immediately following the merger (subject to
reduction to the extent shareholders elect to exercise and
perfect their appraisal rights) and will therefore have a
significant economic interest in BFC;
|
|
|
|
the implied value of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock
of $1.39 per share based on the closing prices of BFCs
Class A Common Stock and Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock on the Pink Sheets on July 2, 2009, the last
trading day prior to the announcement of the signing of the
merger agreement, representing a premium of approximately 26%
over the closing price of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock on that day, and a premium of approximately 67% over the
average market price of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock during the six-month period preceding the date of the
merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
the fact that Woodbridges shareholders, as a result of the
merger and the exchange of their shares of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock for BFCs Class A Common
Stock, will hold shares in a company with a more diversified
portfolio of assets, which is consistent with Woodbridges
stated objective of diversification;
|
|
|
|
the fact that, based on share and market price information as of
July 2, 2009, the date of the merger agreement, BFC, after
the merger, will have a pro forma market capitalization of
approximately $36.0 million compared to Woodbridges
stand-alone market capitalization of $18.6 million;
|
|
|
|
the limited business integration risks due to the preexisting
relationships between BFC and Woodbridge, including, without
limitation, management commonality and BFCs long-term
investment in Woodbridge;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the efficiencies that could be realized as a result of the
merger in legal, accounting and internal audit fees as well as
fees relating to SEC reporting;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that, as of March 31, 2009, Woodbridge had a
debt-to-total capitalization ratio of approximately 67% and that
BFC currently has no outstanding long-term debt at its parent
company level and, therefore, may have greater access to
financial resources;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the opinion of Ewing, Woodbridges financial advisor, to
the effect that, as of the date of the opinion and subject to
and based on the qualifications, limitations and assumptions set
forth in the opinion, the consideration to be received by
holders of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock in the
merger was fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders
(see The Merger Opinion of Woodbridges
Financial Advisor);
|
|
|
|
|
|
current financial market conditions and historical market
prices, volatility and trading information with respect to
BFCs Class A Common Stock and Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock;
|
|
|
|
the opportunity for holders of Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock to benefit from any increase in the trading price
of BFCs Class A Common Stock between the date of the
merger agreement and the effective time of the merger because
the exchange ratio is fixed;
|
|
|
|
the absence of any termination fee payable by Woodbridge to BFC
if the merger agreement is terminated prior to completion of the
merger;
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that, in connection with the merger, the seven
directors of Woodbridge who are not currently directors of BFC
(as well as Seth Wise, the President of Woodbridge) are to be
appointed to BFCs board of directors, which is expected to
provide a degree of continuity and involvement by directors of
Woodbridge in BFC following the merger;
|
|
|
|
the expected qualification of the merger as a
reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code, resulting in the shares of
BFCs Class A Common Stock to be received by holders
of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock in connection
with the merger not being subject to federal income tax, as
described under the section entitled The
Merger Material U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences of the Merger; and
|
|
|
|
the belief that the terms of the merger agreement, including the
parties respective representations, warranties and
covenants contained therein, are reasonable.
|
The board of directors of Woodbridge, in reaching its decision
to approve the merger agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby also considered potential detriments
related to the merger, including, without limitation, the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
the substantial costs to be incurred in connection with the
merger, including transaction expenses arising from the merger,
whether or not the merger is consummated;
|
|
|
|
the possibility that holders of Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock could be adversely affected by a decrease in the
trading price of BFCs Class A Common Stock between
the date of the merger agreement and the effective time of the
merger;
|
|
|
|
possible disruptions to Woodbridges operations and
management distractions that could arise from the merger;
|
|
|
|
the possibility that the expected benefits from the merger
described above may not be realized, including the fact that
BFCs potentially greater access to financial resources may
not be realized and BFCs cash flow may be negatively
impacted as a result of Woodbridges shareholders
exercising their appraisal rights or otherwise;
|
|
|
|
the limitations imposed in the merger agreement on the
solicitation or consideration by Woodbridge of alternative
business combinations prior to the consummation of the merger
and the fact that Woodbridge did not seek out any alternative
transactions prior to signing the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the interests that certain executive officers and directors of
Woodbridge have with respect to the merger in addition to their
interests as shareholders of Woodbridge generally, as described
under The Merger Interests of Certain Persons
in the Merger;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that holders of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock who receive shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock
in the merger will become subject to the risks inherent to
businesses in the diverse mix of industries in which BFC has
investments, including, primarily, the banking industry, which
has been adversely impacted by the current economic
downturn; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
various other risks associated with the merger and the
operations of BFC following the merger set forth under the
section entitled Risk Factors.
|
After consideration of these material factors, the board of
directors of Woodbridge determined that the potential benefits
of the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated
thereby outweighed the potential detriments of the merger
agreement and such transactions.
This discussion of the information and factors considered by the
board of directors of Woodbridge is not intended to be
exhaustive and may not include all of the factors considered. In
reaching its determination to approve and recommend the merger
agreement, the board of directors of Woodbridge did not quantify
or assign any relative or specific weights to the various
factors that it considered. Rather, the board of directors of
Woodbridge viewed its determination and recommendation as being
based on an overall analysis and on the totality of the
information presented to and factors considered by it. In
addition, in considering the factors
64
described above, individual members of the board of directors of
Woodbridge may have given different weight to different factors
or taken into account other factors. After considering this
information, the board of directors of Woodbridge approved the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and
recommends that Woodbridges shareholders approve the
merger agreement.
Opinion
of BFCs Financial Advisor
General
BFC retained JMP Securities to serve as its financial advisor in
connection with the merger. The board of directors of BFC
selected JMP Securities based on JMP Securities
qualifications, experience and reputation and its knowledge of
the business and affairs of BFC. At the meeting of the board of
directors of BFC held on July 2, 2009, JMP Securities
rendered its oral opinion, subsequently confirmed in writing,
that, as of July 2, 2009, based upon and subject to the
assumptions, qualifications and limitations set forth in the
opinion, the exchange ratio was fair from a financial point of
view to BFCs shareholders.
The full text of JMP Securities opinion, dated as of
July 2, 2009, which sets forth, among other things, the
assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and
limitations on the review undertaken by JMP Securities in
rendering its opinion is attached as Annex B to this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. You are urged to read the opinion
carefully and in its entirety. JMP Securities opinion is
directed to the board of directors of BFC, addresses only the
fairness from a financial point of view of the exchange ratio to
BFCs shareholders and does not address any other aspect of
the merger or constitute a recommendation to any BFC shareholder
as to how to vote on the merger and the related transactions at
BFCs special meeting. This summary is qualified in its
entirety by reference to the full text of JMP Securities
opinion.
In connection with rendering its opinion, JMP Securities, among
other things:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain publicly available financial statements and
other business and financial information of BFC and Woodbridge;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the reported prices and trading activity for BFCs
and Woodbridges respective Class A Common Stock;
|
|
|
|
compared the financial performance of BFC and the prices and
trading activity of BFCs Class A Common Stock with
that of certain other publicly-traded companies that it believed
were generally comparable to BFC;
|
|
|
|
compared the financial performance of Woodbridge and the prices
and trading activity of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock with that of certain other publicly-traded companies that
it believed were generally comparable to Woodbridge;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the financial terms, to the extent publicly available,
of certain merger transactions that it believed were generally
comparable to the proposed merger between BFC and Woodbridge;
|
|
|
|
participated in discussions among representatives of BFC and
Woodbridge and their respective legal advisors;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the July 1, 2009 draft of the merger agreement and
certain other related documents which BFC provided to
it; and
|
|
|
|
considered such other factors, and performed such other
analysis, as it deemed appropriate.
|
In arriving at its opinion, JMP Securities, among other things,
assumed and relied upon, without independent verification, the
accuracy and completeness of the information supplied or
otherwise made available to it by BFC and Woodbridge for the
purposes of its opinion. JMP Securities further relied upon the
assurance of the management of BFC and Woodbridge that they were
not aware of any facts that would make any of such information
inaccurate or misleading. In addition, JMP Securities assumed
that the proposed merger would be consummated in accordance with
the terms set forth in the merger agreement without: the
65
occurrence of any material adverse effect; the occurrence of any
litigation, arbitration or other proceeding which enjoins or
prohibits the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement;
the enactment of any law which prohibits the consummation of the
merger; or the issuance of any order which precludes
consummation of the merger. JMP Securities assumed that, in
connection with the receipt of all the necessary governmental,
regulatory or other approvals, permits, consents and orders
required for the merger, no delays, limitations, conditions,
restrictions or orders would be imposed that would have an
adverse effect on the contemplated benefits expected to be
derived in the merger. JMP Securities is not a legal, tax or
regulatory advisor and relied upon, without independent
verification, the assessment of BFC and their legal, tax or
regulatory advisors with respect to legal, tax or regulatory
matters. JMP Securities did not make any independent valuation
or appraisal of the assets or liabilities of BFC or Woodbridge,
nor was it furnished with any such appraisals. JMP
Securities opinion was necessarily based on financial,
economic, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the
information made available to it as of, the date of the opinion.
Events occurring after the date of the opinion may affect the
opinion and the assumptions used in preparing it, and JMP
Securities did not assume any obligation to update, revise or
reaffirm its opinion; provided, however, subject to the
foregoing, and without providing the board of directors of BFC
with any assurance as to the contents thereof, JMP Securities
has agreed, if requested to do so by the board of directors of
BFC, to update its opinion as of a date reasonably proximate to
the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
JMP Securities was not requested to consider, and its opinion
did not address, BFCs underlying business decision to
enter into the merger agreement or the relative merits of the
merger as compared to any alternative business strategies that
might exist for BFC or the effect of any other transaction in
which BFC might engage. JMP Securities was not asked to
consider, and its opinion did not address, the non-financial
terms of the merger agreement, nor does it address the terms of
any related agreements which may be entered into by the parties
in connection with the merger. In addition, JMP Securities
expressed no view or opinion as to the fairness of the amount or
nature of, or any other aspect relating to, the compensation to
any officers, directors or employees of any parties to the
merger or class of such persons, relative to the merger
consideration or otherwise.
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses
provided by JMP Securities in connection with rendering its
opinion. Although each analysis was provided to the board of
directors of BFC, in connection with arriving at its opinion,
JMP Securities considered all of its analysis as a whole and did
not attribute any particular weight to any analysis described
below. These summaries of financial analyses include information
presented in tabular format. In order to fully understand the
financial analyses used by JMP Securities, the tables must be
read together with the text of each summary. The tables alone do
not constitute a complete description of the financial analyses.
In connection with rendering its opinion, JMP Securities advised
BFC that it conducted various analytical work, including, the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
a contribution analysis (i) for the three month period
ended March 31, 2009 and (ii) for the twelve month
period ended December 31, 2008;
|
|
|
|
a comparable public company analysis (which was based on public
company peer group trading valuations);
|
|
|
|
an exchange ratio analysis (which was based on the relative
stock price performance of Woodbridges and BFCs
respective Class A Common Stock); and
|
|
|
|
a premiums paid analysis (which was based on precedent
comparable transactions).
|
JMP Securities noted that the exchange ratio for the merger, as
contemplated by the terms and conditions of the merger
agreement, is 3.47 shares of BFCs Class A Common
Stock for each share of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock (other than shares owned by BFC).
66
Summary
of Financial Analyses Provided by JMP Securities
CONTRIBUTION
ANALYSIS
JMP Securities conducted a contribution analysis based on the
contribution of BFCs and Woodbridges stand-alone
financial metrics. The financial metrics exclude the effects of
the merger and any potential synergies therefrom.
For
the three months ended March 31, 2009.
BFCs financials are based on the Parent Company
Condensed Statements of Financial Condition and
Operations, as set forth in BFCs Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009. The contribution
analysis was based upon the applicable numbers for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and assumed that the
12.9 million shares of Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock not then owned by BFC were converted into
44.8 million shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock
based on the exchange ratio of 3:47:1.00 shares.
Based upon Woodbridges Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, Woodbridges
total revenue, total assets and shareholders equity for
such period were $4.3 million, $524.1 million and
$135.4 million, respectively, and, after netting out the
23.6% interest represented by Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock owned by BFC (or $1.0 million in revenue,
$123.6 million in assets and $31.9 million in
shareholders equity), the residual Woodbridge contribution
was $3.3 million, $400.6 million and
$103.5 million, respectively.
The combined Woodbridge and BFC revenue, assets and
shareholders equity (in dollars and percentages) for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 were as follows (dollars
in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
% Total
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
% Total
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
% Total
|
|
|
Woodbridge
|
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
92
|
%
|
|
Woodbridge
|
|
$
|
400.6
|
|
|
|
77
|
%
|
|
Woodbridge
|
|
$
|
103.5
|
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
BFC
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
BFC
|
|
|
122.8
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
BFC
|
|
|
104.5
|
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
523.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
207.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JMP noted that the pro forma ownership of BFC after giving
effect to the merger would be 50% owned by BFCs
shareholders and 50% owned by Woodbridges shareholders
(other than BFC).
For
the twelve months ended December 31, 2008.
BFCs financials are based on the Parent Company
Condensed Statements of Financial Condition and
Operations, as set forth in BFCs Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008. The contribution
analysis was based upon the applicable numbers for the twelve
months ended December 31, 2008 and assumed that the
12.9 million shares of Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock not then owned by BFC (and referenced in
Woodbridges Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008) were converted
into 44.8 million shares of BFCs Class A Common
Stock based on the exchange ratio of 3.47:1.00 shares.
Based upon Woodbridges Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, Woodbridges
total revenue, total assets and shareholders equity for
2008 were $25.5 million, $559.3 million and
$119.5 million, respectively, and, after netting out the
23.6% interest represented by Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock owned by BFC (or $6.0 million in revenue,
$131.8 million in assets and $28.2 million in
shareholders equity), the residual Woodbridge contribution
was $19.5 million, $427.4 million and
$91.4 million, respectively.
67
The combined Woodbridge and BFC revenue, assets and
shareholders equity (in dollars and percentages) for the
twelve months ended December 31, 2008 were as follows
(dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
% Total
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
% Total
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
% Total
|
|
|
Woodbridge
|
|
$
|
19.5
|
|
|
|
89
|
%
|
|
Woodbridge
|
|
$
|
427.4
|
|
|
|
77
|
%
|
|
Woodbridge
|
|
$
|
91.4
|
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
BFC
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
BFC
|
|
|
131.2
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
BFC
|
|
|
112.9
|
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
22.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
558.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
204.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPARABLE
PUBLIC COMPANY ANALYSIS
JMP Securities conducted a comparable public company analysis
based upon public company peer group trading valuations.
BFCs
Peer Group
BFCs peer group classification was determined based upon
its subsidiaries largest exposure by industry, which was
comprised of two segments: (i) Southeast regional banks and
thrifts, because of BFCs interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp
and its federal savings bank subsidiary, BankAtlantic; and
(ii) land developers, because of BFCs interest in
Woodbridge and its Core Communities subsidiary. In the case of
both the regional banks and thrifts and the land developers, JMP
Securities analyzed the following data points as of
June 30, 2009 for each of the peer companies in the data
set: the price per share; the fully diluted shares outstanding;
the market capitalization; the tangible book value; and the
price to tangible book value. The mean and median figures of the
price to tangible book value for the data set of (a) the
regional banks and thrifts was 0.92x and 1.04x, respectively,
and (b) the land developers was 0.90x and 0.44x,
respectively. For comparative purposes, in the case of BFC, the
following was determined by JMP Securities as of June 30,
2009: the share price was $0.41; the fully diluted shares
outstanding were 45.1 million; the market capitalization
was $18.5 million; the tangible book value was
$104.5 million; and the price to tangible book value was
0.18x.
The foregoing data is set forth below in tabular form (dollars
in millions, except share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price/Tangible Book Value Multiple
|
|
Land Developers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avatar Holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brookfield Homes
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean
|
|
|
0.90x
|
|
California Coastal Communities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Median
|
|
|
0.44x
|
|
The St. Joe Companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banks and Thrifts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bancorp South
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic Bancorp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colonial BancGroup
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Citizens BancShares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hancock Holding Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean
|
|
|
0.92x
|
|
Seacoast Banking Crop. of Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
Median
|
|
|
1.04x
|
|
South Financial Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trustmark Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United Bankshares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United Community Banks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WesBanco
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Price
|
|
Diluted
|
|
Market
|
|
Tangible
|
|
Price /
|
|
|
6/30/09
|
|
Shares(1)
|
|
Cap.(1)
|
|
Book Value
|
|
Tang. B V
|
|
BFC Financial Corporation(2)
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
|
45.1
|
|
|
$
|
18.5
|
|
|
$
|
104.5
|
|
|
|
0.18x
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Fully diluted shares outstanding is calculated using the
Treasury Stock Method and accounts for in-the-money outstanding
options and warrants. |
|
(2) |
|
Excludes goodwill associated with consolidation of BFCs
investments in subsidiaries. |
Woodbridges
Peer Group
Woodbridges peer group classification was also determined
based upon its subsidiaries largest exposure by industry,
which was also comprised of two segments: (i) timeshare
operators, because of Woodbridges interest in Bluegreen;
and (ii) land developers, because of Woodbridges Core
Communities subsidiary. In the case of both the timeshare
operators and the land developers, JMP Securities analyzed the
following data points as of June 30, 2009 for each of the
peer companies in the data set: the price per share; the fully
diluted shares outstanding; the market capitalization; the
tangible book value; and the price to tangible book value. The
mean and median figures of the price to tangible book value for
the data set of (a) the timeshare operators was 0.23x and
0.23x, respectively, and (b) the land developers was 0.90x
and 0.44x, respectively. For comparative purposes, in the case
of Woodbridge, the following was determined by JMP Securities as
of June 30, 2009: the price per share was $1.10; the fully
diluted shares outstanding were 16.9 million; the market
capitalization was $18.6 million; the tangible book value
was $130.1 million; and the price to tangible book value
was 0.14x.
The foregoing data is set forth below in tabular form (dollars
in millions, except share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price/Tangible Book Value Multiple
|
|
Timeshare Operators
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean
|
|
|
0.23x
|
|
Silverleaf Resorts
|
|
|
|
|
|
Median
|
|
|
0.23x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land Developers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avatar Holdings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brookfield Homes
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean
|
|
|
0.90x
|
|
California Coastal Communities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Median
|
|
|
0.44x
|
|
The St. Joe Companies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Price
|
|
Diluted
|
|
Market
|
|
Tangible
|
|
Price /
|
|
|
6/30/09
|
|
Shares(1)
|
|
Cap.(1)
|
|
Book Value
|
|
Tang. B V
|
|
Woodbridge Holdings Corporation
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
|
|
16.9
|
|
|
$
|
18.6
|
|
|
$
|
130.1
|
|
|
|
0.14x
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Fully diluted shares outstanding is calculated using the
Treasury Stock Method and accounts for in-the-money outstanding
options and warrants. |
HISTORICAL
EXCHANGE RATIO ANALYSIS
JMP Securities also conducted an exchange ratio analysis based
on the relative stock price performance of Woodbridges and
BFCs respective Class A Common Stock.
JMP Securities analyzed over the July 2008 through June 2009
period the 10, 30, 60, 120, 180 and 240-trading day averages of
the closing stock prices of each of Woodbridges and
BFCs Class A Common Stock
69
in order to ascertain an implied exchange ratio. This analysis
produced the following data, as shown in tabular form:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing Stock Price
|
|
Implied
|
Time Period
|
|
Woodbridge
|
|
BFC
|
|
Exchange Ratio
|
|
10-trading day average
|
|
$
|
1.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
2.70
|
x
|
30-trading day average
|
|
$
|
1.43
|
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
3.42
|
x
|
60-trading day average
|
|
$
|
1.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
2.94
|
x
|
120-trading day average
|
|
$
|
0.88
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
3.18
|
x
|
180-trading day average
|
|
$
|
0.84
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
2.96
|
x
|
240-trading day average
|
|
$
|
1.53
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
4.21
|
x
|
JMP Securities noted that the exchange ratio with respect to the
merger, as contemplated by the merger agreement, is 3.47x.
PREMIUMS
PAID ANALYSIS
JMP Securities reviewed and compared the proposed financial
terms and premium implied in the merger to corresponding
publicly available financial terms and premiums of selected
transactions. In selecting these transactions, JMP Securities
reviewed selected finance and banking transactions in merger of
equals transactions since May 31, 2001 through
November 29, 2007 in the range of $15.0 million to
$500.0 million of equity value. In its analysis, JMP
Securities reviewed the precedent transactions set forth in the
chart below:
|
|
|
|
|
Announcement
|
|
Target
|
|
Acquiror
|
|
11/29/07
|
|
Columbia Financial Corp.
|
|
CCFNB Bancorp Inc.
|
11/09/07
|
|
Omega Financial Corp.
|
|
FNB Corp.
|
09/12/07
|
|
MidWestOne Financial Group Inc.
|
|
ISB Financial Corp.
|
07/26/07
|
|
FNB Corp.
|
|
Virginia Financial Group, Inc.
|
02/27/07
|
|
FNB Financial Services Corp.
|
|
LSB Bancshares, Inc.
|
09/21/06
|
|
Main Street Trust Inc.
|
|
First Busey Corp.
|
07/01/06
|
|
Centrue Financial Corp.
|
|
UnionBancorp Inc.
|
09/06/01
|
|
BancFirst Ohio Corp.
|
|
UNB Corp.
|
08/15/01
|
|
MCB Financial Corp.
|
|
Business Bancorp
|
06/13/01
|
|
Virginia Commonwealth Financial Corp.
|
|
Virginia Financial Corp.
|
05/31/01
|
|
First Gaston Bank of North Carolina
|
|
Catawba Valley Bancshares
|
JMP Securities derived from these selected transactions a
reference range of premiums paid relative to the trading share
prices at six different points in time preceding the
announcement of the selected transactions. The premium paid for
each of the selected transactions relative to the applicable
share prices was determined based on (a) the percentage
premium paid based on the closing price on the applicable date
and (b) the percentage premium paid based on the average
price over the applicable period, in each case for each of the
following number of days prior to the announcement of the
applicable merger: 1; 7; 30; 60; 90; and 120. The mean and
median of the percentage premium paid for each of the applicable
points in time follows:
|
|
|
|
|
based on the closing price on the applicable date,
the mean/median at that date was: at 1 day prior
(21.2%/18.6%); at 7 days prior (20.2%/19.4%); at
30 days prior (19.8/17.9%); at 60 days prior
(19.2%/16.3%);
at 90 days prior (26.0%/17.8%); and at 120 days prior
(21.6%/22.6%); and
|
|
|
|
based on the average price over the applicable
period, the mean/median over the period was: at
1 day (21.2%/18.6%); at 7 days prior (20.5%/19.0%); at
30 days prior (18.5%/16.9%); at 60 days prior
(19.0%/17.6%); at 90 days prior (20.1%/17.8%); and at
120 days prior (21.0%/17.0%).
|
70
For comparative purposes, JMP Securities determined that the
percentage premium paid for the proposed merger between BFC and
Woodbridge at each of the same points in time was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
based on the closing price on the applicable date,
the premium was: at 1 day prior (29.3%); at 7 days
prior (23.7%); at 30 days prior (-13.3%) at 60 days
prior (137.1%); at 90 days prior (77.8%); and at
120 days prior (122.3%); and
|
|
|
|
based on the average price over the applicable
period, the premium was: at 1 day prior (29.3%); at
7 days prior (25.0%); at 30 days prior (-0.8%); at
60 days prior (30.9%); at 90 days prior (54.0%); and
at 120 days prior (62.0%).
|
The foregoing is set forth below in tabular format:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Premium Paid to Spot(1)
|
|
% Premium Paid to Average(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
60
|
|
90
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
60
|
|
90
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Day
|
|
7 Day
|
|
Day
|
|
Day
|
|
Day
|
|
Day
|
|
1 Day
|
|
7 Day
|
|
Day
|
|
Day
|
|
Day
|
|
Day
|
Announcement
|
|
Target
|
|
Acquiror
|
|
|
|
Prior
|
|
Prior
|
|
Prior
|
|
Prior
|
|
Prior
|
|
Prior
|
|
Prior
|
|
Prior
|
|
Prior
|
|
Prior
|
|
Prior
|
|
Prior
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Select Finance/ Banking MOE(3) Transactions Since 2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/29/07
|
|
Columbia Financial Corp.
|
|
CCFNB Bancorp Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/09/07
|
|
Omega Financial Corp.
|
|
FNB Corp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
09/12/07
|
|
MidWestOne Financial Group Inc.
|
|
ISB Financial Corp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/26/07
|
|
FNB Corp.
|
|
Virginia Financial Group, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02/27/07
|
|
FNB Financial Services Corp.
|
|
LSB Bancshares, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
09/21/06
|
|
Main Street Trust Inc.
|
|
First Busey Corp.
|
|
Mean
|
|
|
21.2
|
%
|
|
|
20.2
|
%
|
|
|
19.8
|
%
|
|
|
19.2
|
%
|
|
|
26.0
|
%
|
|
|
21.6
|
%
|
|
|
21.2
|
%
|
|
|
20.5
|
%
|
|
|
18.5
|
%
|
|
|
19.0
|
%
|
|
|
20.1
|
%
|
|
|
21.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
07/01/06
|
|
Centrue Financial Corp.
|
|
UnionBancorp Inc.
|
|
Median
|
|
|
18.6
|
%
|
|
|
19.4
|
%
|
|
|
17.9
|
%
|
|
|
16.3
|
%
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
|
|
22.6
|
%
|
|
|
18.6
|
%
|
|
|
19.0
|
%
|
|
|
16.9
|
%
|
|
|
17.6
|
%
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
09/06/01
|
|
BancFirst Ohio Corp.
|
|
UNB Corp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08/15/01
|
|
MCB Financial Corp.
|
|
Business Bancorp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
06/13/01
|
|
Virginia Commonwealth Financial Corp.
|
|
Virginia Financial Corp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
05/31/01
|
|
First Gaston Bank of North Carolina
|
|
Catawba Valley Bancshares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodbridge Holdings Corporation
|
|
BFC Financial Corporation(4)
|
|
|
|
|
29.3
|
%
|
|
|
23.7
|
%
|
|
|
(13.3
|
)%
|
|
|
137.1
|
%
|
|
|
77.8
|
%
|
|
|
122.3
|
%
|
|
|
29.3
|
%
|
|
|
25.0
|
%
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)%
|
|
|
30.9
|
%
|
|
|
54.0
|
%
|
|
|
62.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on the closing price on the applicable date. |
|
(2) |
|
Based on the average price over the applicable periods. |
|
(3) |
|
Merger of equals transactions. |
|
(4) |
|
Based on 3.47x exchange ratio and Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock closing price of $1.10 and BFCs Class A
Common Stock closing price of $0.41 (as of 6/30/2009). |
No company or transaction utilized in the selected precedent
transactions analysis is identical to BFC or the proposed
merger. In evaluating the precedent transactions, JMP Securities
made judgments and assumptions with regard to industry
performance, general business, economic market and financial
conditions, and other matters, many of which are beyond the
control of BFC, such as the impact of competition on BFC and the
industry generally, industry growth and the absence of any
adverse material change in the financial condition and prospects
of BFC or in the financial markets in general. Mathematical
analysis, such as determining the mean or median, or the high or
the low, is not in itself a meaningful method of using
comparable transaction data.
71
Other
Matters Relating to JMP Securities Opinion
In connection with the review of the merger in its capacity as
BFCs financial advisor, JMP Securities performed a variety
of financial and comparative analysis for purposes of rendering
its opinion. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex
process and is not necessarily susceptible to a partial analysis
or summary description. In arriving at its opinion, JMP
Securities considered the results of all of its analyses as a
whole and did not attribute any particular weight to any
analysis or factor considered by it. JMP Securities believes
that the summary provided and the analyses described above must
be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of these
analyses, without considering all of them as a whole, would
create an incomplete view of the process underlying its analyses
and opinion. In addition, JMP Securities may have given various
analyses and factors more or less weight than other analyses and
factors and may have deemed various assumptions more or less
probable than other assumptions, so that the range of valuations
resulting from any particular analysis described above should
therefore not be taken to be JMP Securities view of the
actual value of BFC.
In performing its analyses, JMP Securities made numerous
assumptions with respect to industry performance, general
business and economic conditions and other matters, many of
which are beyond the control of BFC. Any estimates contained in
JMP Securities analyses are not necessarily indicative of
future results or actual values, which may be significantly more
or less favorable than those suggested by these estimates. The
analyses performed were prepared solely as a part of the
analyses of JMP Securities of the fairness from a financial
point of view of the exchange ratio to BFCs shareholders
and were conducted in connection with the delivery by JMP
Securities of its opinion, dated July 2, 2009, to the board
of directors of BFC. JMP Securities analyses do not
purport to be appraisals or to reflect the prices at which
shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock might actually
trade. The exchange ratio in the merger, as set forth in the
merger agreement, was agreed to through arms-length
negotiations between BFC and Woodbridge and was approved by the
board of directors of BFC and by the special committee and board
of directors of Woodbridge. JMP Securities did not recommend any
specific exchange ratio to BFC or that any exchange ratio
constituted the only appropriate exchange ratio to be used in
the merger and to be set forth in the merger agreement.
In addition, JMP Securities opinion and its presentation
to the board of directors of BFC was one of many factors taken
into consideration by the board of directors of BFC in deciding
to approve the merger. Consequently, the analyses described
above should not be viewed as determinative of the opinion of
the board of directors of BFC with respect to the exchange
ratio, or of whether the board of directors of BFC would have
been willing to agree to a different exchange ratio.
JMP Securities is a nationally recognized investment banking and
advisory firm. JMP Securities has advised BFC that, as part of
its investment banking and financial advisory business, JMP
Securities is continuously engaged in the valuation of
businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and
acquisitions, negotiated underwritings, competitive biddings,
secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities,
private placements and valuations for corporate and other
purposes. In the ordinary course of business, JMP Securities may
from time to time trade in the securities of or indebtedness of
BFC and Woodbridge for its own account, the accounts of
investment funds and other clients under the management of JMP
Securities and for the accounts of its customers and,
accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in
these securities or indebtedness.
BFC paid JMP Securities an engagement fee of $50,000 in
connection with JMP Securities services as BFCs
financial advisor with respect to BFCs consideration of a
merger with Woodbridge, and an additional fee of $200,000 upon
JMP Securities delivery of its fairness opinion to
BFCs board of directors. BFC has also agreed to reimburse
JMP Securities for its reasonable expenses incurred in
performing its services and to indemnify JMP Securities and its
affiliates, their respective directors, officers, agents and
employees and each person, if any, controlling JMP Securities or
any of its affiliates against certain liabilities and expenses,
including certain liabilities under federal securities laws,
related to or arising out of JMP Securities engagement and
any related transactions.
72
Opinion
of Woodbridges Financial Advisor
General
Woodbridges special committee retained Ewing to serve as
its financial advisor with respect to the merger.
Woodbridges special committee chose Ewing as its financial
advisor based on the special committees view of the
importance of BankAtlantic Bancorps results to the
consolidated financial condition of BFC and Ewings
reputation and expertise in assessing and analyzing financial
institutions generally, and thrifts in particular.
On July 2, 2009, Ewing delivered to Woodbridges
special committee and full board of directors its opinion to the
effect that, as of the date thereof and subject to the
assumptions, factors and limitations set forth in the opinion
and described below, the consideration to be exchanged by BFC in
the merger is fair to Woodbridges shareholders from a
financial point of view.
The full text of Ewings opinion, which is attached to
this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Annex C,
describes, among other things, the assumptions made, general
procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the
review undertaken by Ewing in rendering its opinion. The opinion
was furnished for Woodbridges special committee and board
of directors in evaluating the advisability of the merger. The
opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any shareholder
of Woodbridge on whether to approve the merger agreement. The
opinion was furnished for the use and benefit of
Woodbridges special committee and board of directors in
connection with its consideration of the merger and, by its
terms, is not intended to be used, and may not be used, for any
other purpose without the written consent of Ewing, except to
the extent required by applicable law. The summary of
Ewings opinion presented below is qualified in its
entirety by reference to the full text of the opinion, which is
attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as
Annex C. Woodbridges shareholders are urged to read
the opinion carefully and in its entirety.
Ewing has not been requested to, and did not initiate any
discussions with, or solicit any indications of interest from,
third parties with respect to the merger or any alternatives to
the merger. Ewing also did not advise Woodbridges special
committee or board of directors or any other party with respect
to alternatives to the merger, nor did Ewing recommend the
amount or type of consideration to be paid in the merger to
holders of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock.
Ewings opinion is based on financial, economic, market and
other conditions as in effect on, and the information made
available to Ewing as of, the date of the opinion. Ewing has not
undertaken, and is under no obligation, to update, revise or
withdraw the opinion, or otherwise comment on or consider events
occurring after the date of the opinion unless Woodbridges
special committee requests Ewing to do so.
Ewing was not requested to opine as to, and did not address,
among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the underlying business decision of Woodbridge with respect to
the merger;
|
|
|
|
the terms of any arrangements, understandings, agreements or
documents related to, or the form of any other portion or aspect
of, the merger or otherwise, except as expressly addressed in
the opinion;
|
|
|
|
the relative merits of the merger as compared to any alternative
business strategies that might exist for Woodbridge or any other
party or the effect of any other transaction in which
Woodbridge, BFC, their respective shareholders, or any other
party might engage;
|
|
|
|
the tax or legal consequences of the merger to either
Woodbridge, BFC, their respective shareholders, or any other
party; or
|
|
|
|
the solvency, creditworthiness or fair value of Woodbridge or
BFC under any applicable laws relating to bankruptcy,
insolvency, fraudulent conveyance or similar matters.
|
Furthermore, no opinion, counsel or interpretation is intended
in matters that require legal, regulatory, accounting,
insurance, tax or other similar professional advice. It is
assumed that such opinions, counsel or interpretations have been
or will be obtained from the appropriate professional sources.
Furthermore, Ewing relied, with the consent of Woodbridges
special committee, on the assessment by that committee,
Woodbridge
73
and BFC and their respective advisors, as to all legal,
regulatory, accounting, insurance and tax matters with respect
to Woodbridge, BFC and the merger.
In connection with its opinion, Ewing made and performed such
reviews, analyses and inquiries as it deemed necessary and
appropriate under the circumstances. Among other things, Ewing:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewed the filings of Woodbridge, BFC and BankAtlantic Bancorp
with the SEC, including each companys Annual Reports on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and Quarterly
Report on Form
10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2009, including, without
limitation, the financial statements contained therein;
|
|
|
|
reviewed certain other publicly available financial data for
Woodbridge, BFC and BankAtlantic Bancorp and other financial and
operating information prepared by the management of Woodbridge,
BFC and BankAtlantic Bancorp;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the historical market prices and trading volume for the
publicly traded securities of Woodbridge and BFC;
|
|
|
|
reviewed the terms and conditions of the merger
agreement; and
|
|
|
|
conducted such other studies, analyses and inquiries as Ewing
deemed appropriate.
|
Summary
of Financial Analyses Provided by Ewing
In performing its analysis of the fairness of the proposed
exchange ratio and the terms of the merger, Ewing examined the
assets and liabilities of Woodbridge and BFC, and analyzed the
operations and capital adequacy of BankAtlantic Bancorp and
BankAtlantic, the largest investment of BFC. Ewing examined the
financial ability of BankAtlantic to continue to satisfy
regulatory capital requirements. Ewings assumption
regarding the performance of BankAtlantic was based on the
consensus outlook that the recession would end in mid-2010 with
a subsequent slow recovery.
Historically, Woodbridge, through its subsidiaries, Levitt and
Sons and Core Communities, engaged in both homebuilding and the
development of master-planned communities. Its revenues during
2005 and 2006 were $588 million and $591 million,
respectively, and Woodbridges success in those years was
the result of the convergence of many favorable demographic
factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the ready availability of mortgage financing and very low
interest rates resulting from the Federal Reserves
decision to help the economy after the collapse of
the high-tech stock bubble in
1999-2000;
|
|
|
|
reduced residential loan underwriting standards resulting from
the acceptance of securitized and sub-prime securities by the
markets and their endorsement by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac;
|
|
|
|
a strong economy;
|
|
|
|
a favorable stock market;
|
|
|
|
increased personal wealth and liquidity created by the stock
market and the liquidity created by the advent of home equity
loans; and
|
|
|
|
steadily increasing home prices.
|
With the collapse of the housing market and the economy, the
revenues of Woodbridge dropped precipitously by 25% in 2007 to
$442 million and by 90% in 2008 to $42 million. Levitt
and Sons filed a voluntary bankruptcy petition in November 2007,
and Core Communities sales declined significantly.
Ewings
Overview of Assets and Investments of Woodbridge
The following is a description of the assets and investments of
Woodbridge (on a consolidated basis, including the assets of
Core) as of March 31, 2009.
74
List and
Percentages of Woodbridges Assets
As
of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
Assets
|
|
Asset Values
|
|
|
Woodbridge Assets
|
|
|
Cash & CDs
|
|
$
|
127,000,000
|
|
|
|
24.0
|
%
|
Real Estate Development Land
|
|
|
242,000,000
|
|
|
|
46.6
|
%
|
Shopping Centers & Equipment
|
|
|
107,000,000
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
%
|
31% of Bluegreen (9,500,000 Shares)
|
|
|
16,600,000
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
49% of Pizza Fusion
|
|
|
3,300,000
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
Office Depot (1,400,000 Shares)
|
|
|
1,900,000
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
27,000,000
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
524,500,000
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
As indicated above, the primary assets of Woodbridge consist of
land, shopping centers, and equipment which represent 66.6% of
the total assets. The land consists primarily of large tracts of
developed and undeveloped land located in Hardeeville, South
Carolina (Tradition Hilton Head) and in Port St. Lucie, Florida
(Tradition, Florida). These large tracts of land and their
related debt are held directly or indirectly by Core Communities.
Ewing observed the following attributes of the various
Woodbridge assets:
A.) Core Communities
1.) Tradition, Florida (Port St. Lucie, FL)
The following represent salient facts regarding Cores
investment at Tradition, Florida, an
8,200 gross-acre,
master-planned community:
|
|
|
|
|
The Tradition DRI was commenced in 2002 and comprises
2,904 acres. All of the developed residential land units
were sold to national and local homebuilders. Several thousand
residential living units have been constructed and sold by the
homebuilders, but many unsold houses remain.
|
|
|
|
The infrastructure of the Tradition DRI is financed by community
development district bonds.
|
|
|
|
The Landing at Tradition is a completed 359,864 square foot
power retail center located on 79 acres in the town center
of Tradition, Florida and includes a number of national big box
retailers. The retail center is 92% leased. The property is
financed by a $58,300,000 loan.
|
|
|
|
The Village Center at Tradition is a Publix-anchored
112,421 rentable square foot shopping center (97% leased)
that is part of a
23-acre
mixed-use project located in the town center. There is also a
completed 28,000 square foot office building on the
property. Two separate loans on the property total $13,700,000,
which mature in June and July of 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Western Grove DRI consists of 1,593 acres with
entitlements for 4,062 residential units, 365,904 square
feet of retail, 250,906 square feet of office space, an
86-acre city
park, and a
20-acre
school site. In addition, the undeveloped 640 acres
mentioned above in the Tradition DRI has entitlements for 1,784
residential units and was considered in Ewings analysis to
be a part of the Western Grove DRI property.
|
|
|
|
The infrastructure of the Western Grove DRI is to be financed by
community development district bonds. The property has undergone
some site improvements, including extensions of electric service
and water and sewer mains, the installation of a pumping station
and the clearing of some acreage. The Western Grove property is
unencumbered, other than obligations for community development
district bond debt service in the future.
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
A metro study survey prepared for Woodbridge in April 2009
indicated that, due to the current excess of lot inventories in
the immediate market area and the West Palm Beach market, sales
absorption within the Western Grove DRI will not commence until
2021.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Southern Grove DRI consists of 2,104 acres with
entitlements for 6,919 residential units and
13,164,528 square feet of commercial usage.
|
|
|
|
The infrastructure of the Southern Grove DRI is being financed
by community development district bonds.
|
|
|
|
The horizontal infrastructure for a
120-acre
bio-tech/research mixed-use commercial park immediately south of
Tradition Parkway and west of I-95 has been completed. Torrey
Pines Institute for Molecular Studies has purchased a
23-acre site
and completed a 100,000 square foot center. Prospective
tenants in the park are Oregon Health & Science
University Vaccine & Gene Therapy Institute, Mann
Research Center and Martin Memorial Health Systems Hospital.
Construction is commencing on the Becker Road interchange and on
Village Parkway, the primary north-south spine road in the
Southern Grove DRI between Tradition Parkway and Becker Road.
Financing is provided by the community development district
bonds.
|
|
|
|
The Southern Grove DRI is collateral for an $86,700,000 loan
maturing in June 2011.
|
2.) Tradition Hilton Head (Hardeeville, SC)
The following represent salient facts regarding Cores
investment at Tradition, South Carolina, a 5,300-acre,
master-planned community:
|
|
|
|
|
Development and construction activities at Tradition Hilton Head
have virtually ceased.
|
|
|
|
There are entitlements for 9,500 residential units and
2,000,000 square feet of potential commercial building. An
18-hole Fazio golf course and practice center is completed and
open. The golf course, which was originally intended as a
member-only course, is now open to the public in an effort to
defray some of the operating and maintenance costs.
|
|
|
|
Financing of the subdivision improvements has been provided in
the amount of $27,900,000 due October 2019, and in the amount of
$25,000,000 due February 2012.
|
|
|
|
Combined negative cash flow for 2009 is projected to be over
$8,200,000, and there appears to be little asset value in
Tradition Hilton Head.
|
3.) Carolina Oak Homes
|
|
|
|
|
A 150-acre
tract in Tradition, South Carolina to be developed into a
504-unit
attached town home project.
|
|
|
|
Fourteen model homes have been constructed, of which nine have
been sold.
|
|
|
|
Financing has been provided via an $80,000,000 line of credit,
which has been frozen at $37,400,000.
|
|
|
|
Development has ceased other than limited marketing by the
Tradition Hilton Head sales force to sell model homes
and/or the
remaining lots.
|
The aforementioned major projects represent $349 million,
or 67%, of Woodbridges assets as of March 31, 2009.
They serve as collateral for $264 million in loans made to
Core Communities, of which approximately $37 million is
guaranteed by Woodbridge.
B.) Other Assets of Woodbridge
The other assets of Woodbridge consist of investments in various
companies, which as of March 31, 2009 had a total value of
$21.8 million, or 4%, of the total assets of Woodbridge.
Two of the four assets are shares of publicly traded stocks
which were valued at their market value as of March 31,
2009. Woodbridge has
76
determined the value of the other two assets based on methods
prescribed by generally accepted accounting principles.
These assets are as follows:
1.) Cypress Creek Sportsline Office
Building
|
|
|
|
|
This is a 79,000 square foot, three-story, multi-tenant
office building located immediately west of the BankAtlantic
administrative headquarters on Cypress Creek Road in
Ft. Lauderdale.
|
|
|
|
Sportsline.com occupies 41,000 square feet, which
encompasses 52%, of the building, and its lease expires during
the first quarter of 2010.
|
|
|
|
The administrative headquarters of Pizza Fusion occupies
4,900 square feet of the space.
|
|
|
|
The remaining 33,000 square feet of the building is vacant.
Woodbridge is currently in discussions relating to the lease of
21,000 square feet of office space. The building has been
financed by an $11,800,000 term loan that matures on
April 15, 2015.
|
2.) Pizza Fusion Stock
|
|
|
|
|
Pizza Fusion Holdings, Inc. was founded in 2006 and is an
operator and franchisor of upscale, organic pizza restaurants.
There are 19 Pizza Fusion operations currently open, and Pizza
Fusion anticipates opening an additional 17 franchises during
2009. Pizza Fusion projects that it will have 320 franchises
open by 2015. However, the current adverse economic and credit
environment may create an obstacle to the success of that
expansion program.
|
|
|
|
Woodbridge invested $3,000,000 in 2,700,000 shares of Pizza
Fusion Series B Convertible Preferred Stock in September of
2008 and, in July 2009, made an additional investment of
$600,000 in the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock at a
price of $1.15 per share. The additional investment made in July
2009 also entitles Woodbridge to
10-year
warrants for 300,000 shares of Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock at a price of $1.44 per share. Woodbridges
investment represents an approximate 45% economic interest in
Pizza Fusion.
|
3.) Bluegreen Corporation Stock
|
|
|
|
|
Woodbridge owns 9,500,000 shares of the common stock of
Bluegreen Corporation, representing 31% of outstanding shares of
Bluegreen. Bluegreens common stock is listed on the NYSE.
Bluegreen is a developer of timeshare resorts nationally, but
primarily in Florida, Texas and the southeastern United States.
|
|
|
|
The investment in Bluegreen was valued at $16,500,000 as of
March 31, 2009, based on a closing stock price of $1.74 on
that date.
|
|
|
|
Due to difficulties in the financial markets (specifically in
securitization of time share receivables), Bluegreens
ability to continue to finance time share receivables has become
very difficult. Woodbridge is attempting to assist Bluegreen in
developing a financing source for the purchase of its time share
receivables.
|
4.) Office Depot Stock
|
|
|
|
|
Woodbridge owns 1,435,000 shares of Office Depots
common stock. Office Depots common stock is listed on the
NYSE, and the shares owned by Woodbridge represent less than 1%
of the outstanding shares of such stock.
|
|
|
|
The investment in Office Depot was valued at $1,880,000 as of
March 31, 2009, based on a closing stock price of $1.31 per
share on that date.
|
5.) Cash and Other Assets
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2009, Woodbridge held cash and certificates
of deposit totaling $127 million.
|
|
|
|
Other assets totaling $27 million consisted of intangible
assets and goodwill.
|
77
Observations
by Ewing Concerning the Operations of Woodbridge
Woodbridge had a loss from operations of $140 million in
2008. Ewing estimated the cash flows of Woodbridge for 2009,
2010, and 2011 based on the existing cash flows of the major
properties of Woodbridge and managements estimates of
revenues over the three years. Ewings estimates indicate
that the cash flows of Woodbridge will total a negative
$100 million to $140 million over the three-year
period absent resumption of sales by Core. Ewing noted that,
because the profitability and asset values of Woodbridges
real estate assets have been adversely impacted by the
deterioration of the real estate market, as reported in
Woodbridges Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, there are doubts
regarding the ability of Core Communities to continue as a going
concern if Woodbridge chooses not to provide Core Communities
with the cash needed to meet any of its obligations when and if
they arise.
Ewing observed that, unlike the favorable real estate years
prior to 2008, the current and future markets for housing, and
particularly for second home and retirement housing, are very
bleak as evidenced by the 90% reduction in the revenues of
Woodbridge in 2008. Ewing noted that the 25% 40%
decline in house prices, the over supply of existing houses, the
significant reductions in personal wealth, the recession and the
resulting high unemployment, and the sharp decline in the stock
markets have had and may continue to have a depressing effect on
commercial and residential land development for many years.
Ewing also noted that the burden of debt service will create a
cash drain on Woodbridge until the markets for new houses and
the cash flow of Woodbridge greatly improve.
Ewings
Overview of Assets and Investments of BFC
Ewing examined the assets and liabilities of BFC, whose major
holding (other than its interest in Woodbridge) is its
controlling interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp and its wholly
owned subsidiary, BankAtlantic. BFC owns 2,389,697 shares
of BankAtlantic Bancorps Class A Common Stock and all
975,225 shares of BankAtlantic Bancorps Class B
Common Stock, which collectively gives BFC voting control over,
and a 30% economic interest in, BankAtlantic Bancorp. BFC also
holds controlling interest in Woodbridge via its ownership of
3,735,392 shares of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock and all 243,807 shares of Woodbridges
Class B Common Stock, which collectively represent a 58.9%
voting interest and 23.6% economic interest in Woodbridge. BFC
owns a non-controlling interest in Benihana, Inc., which
operates Asian-theme restaurants in the United States.
BFC is a unitary savings bank holding company regulated by the
Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS). As of March 31, 2009,
BFC had consolidated assets of approximately $6.1 billion
and its gross equity was approximately $357 million, which
includes its non-controlling equity interests of approximately
of $253 million for a net equity of $105 million.
A list of BFCs unconsolidated assets and their balance
sheet values as of March 31, 2009 is provided below:
List and
Percentages of BFCs Assets (Unconsolidated)
As
of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
Assets
|
|
Asset Values
|
|
|
BFC Assets
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
7,554,000
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
%
|
Investment in BankAtlantic Bancorp
|
|
|
55,854,000
|
|
|
|
45.5
|
%
|
Investment in Woodbridge
|
|
|
39,417,000
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
%
|
Investment in Benihana
|
|
|
16,458,000
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
3,490,000
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
122,773,000
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
As indicated above, the primary assets of BFC consist of its
investment in BankAtlantic Bancorp and its investment in
Woodbridge. These two investments represent 77% of the total
assets of BFC.
78
Additionally, BFC owns 800,000 shares of Benihanas
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock which is convertible
into an aggregate of 1,578,943 shares of Benihanas
Common Stock (BNHN). As of January 30, 2009,
5,612,139 shares of Benihanas Common Stock and
9,684,511 shares of Benihanas Class A Common
Stock (BNHNA) were outstanding. As of June 19, 2009,
Benihanas Common Stock was trading at $6.15 per share, and
Benihanas Class A Common Stock was trading at $5.80
per share. BFCs investment in Benihana on an as if
converted basis represented 13.4% of the total shares
outstanding as of March 31, 2009. The average trading
volume of Benihanas Common Stock and Class A Common
Stock is 20,000 shares per day and 40,000 shares per
day, respectively.
Benihanas operations were profitable through the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2008, but as a result of the
recession, Benihana incurred a loss of $642,000 for the ten
months ended January 4, 2009. At March 31, 2009, BFC
carried its investment in Benihana at $16,458,000 based on its
calculation of the present value of the Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock.
Observations
by Ewing Concerning BFC
|
|
|
|
|
BFC has no long-term debt at its parent company level.
|
|
|
|
BFCs revenues consisted primarily of dividends from
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge, but both companies have
discontinued the payment of dividends on their common stock. As
a result, revenues have declined from $522,000 in the first
quarter of 2008 to $283,000 in the first quarter of 2009.
BFCs future cash flow must come from future dividends from
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge
and/or the
sale of assets.
|
|
|
|
BFC lost $10,591,000 in the first quarter of 2009, reflecting
its loss of dividend income and its equity interests in
write-downs in its consolidated subsidiaries.
|
|
|
|
Woodbridge has net-operating-loss carry forwards totaling
approximating $70 million.
|
Ewings
Overview of Assets and Investments of BankAtlantic Bancorp and
BankAtlantic
Ewing examined the assets and liabilities of BankAtlantic
Bancorp and BankAtlantic, whose shares represent BFCs
primary asset (45.5% of BFCs total assets). BankAtlantic
Bancorp is the largest publicly traded banking institution based
in Florida with $5.5 billion in assets and approximately
$405 million in equity as of March 31, 2009. In
performing this review, Ewing relied on publicly available
information and documents provided by BankAtlantics
management. BankAtlantic Bancorps Class A Common
Stock (BBX) trades on the NYSE and, as of the close of business
on July 2, 2009, the shares were traded at $3.84 per share.
The objectives of Ewings review were to:
|
|
|
|
|
review BankAtlantics assets and reserves;
|
|
|
|
review the anticipated migration of loan problems and losses to
loss reserves; and
|
|
|
|
determine whether BankAtlantic holds capital at
well-capitalized regulatory levels, and whether such
capital ratio levels are expected to continue.
|
Ewing noted that, in March 2008, BankAtlantic sold $101,500,000
in loans to BankAtlantic Bancorp. These loans have been reduced
in number from 64 to 50 loans, and the outstanding balance on
these loans as of March 31, 2009 was $76,200,000. Specific
impairment reserves for these loans have been established by
BankAtlantic Bancorp in the amount of $11,800,000, which
represents 15.4% of the loans. The loss provisions for these
loans are taken at BankAtlantic Bancorps holding company
level and not at BankAtlantic.
79
Ewings
Observations Concerning BankAtlantic Bancorp and
BankAtlantic
|
|
|
|
|
Ewing analyzed the capital adequacy of BankAtlantic and
concluded that BankAtlantic currently has capital which meets
well capitalized regulatory standards. In addition,
BankAtlantic may have access to additional capital to be
provided by BankAtlantic Bancorp and BFC. If needed, these two
entities could provide $65,000,000 to $90,000,000 to
BankAtlantic by selling the $76,200,000 in loans held indirectly
by BankAtlantic Bancorp, by selling other assets for
approximately $11,000,000 or by utilizing existing cash of
approximately $15,000,000. These resources could represent a
source of a 15%-20% capital cushion for BankAtlantic.
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic Bancorp, as a bank holding company, currently has
no regulatory capital requirements to meet.
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2009, BankAtlantic had $352,000,000 in
nonperforming loans and $22,000,000 in REO. BankAtlantic had
loan loss reserves of $146,600,000 as of March 31, 2009,
which represented 3.4% of its gross loans and 40% of its
nonperforming assets.
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic Bancorp has elected not to pay dividends on its
trust preferred securities as allowed by the applicable
indentures. BankAtlantic ceased paying dividends to BankAtlantic
Bancorp in December 2008 and has no plans to resume payment of
dividends to BankAtlantic Bancorp.
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic Bancorp and BankAtlantic are subject to several
lawsuits that could have an adverse effect on BankAtlantic
Bancorp and BankAtlantic if the plaintiffs prevail.
|
Ewings
Analysis of the Exchange Ratio
Ewing observed that exchange ratios in mergers are typically
based on current and projected earnings, discounted cash flows,
market values of net assets and the terms of merger of
comparable transactions. Ewing observed that this merger is
being proposed in an economic environment in which real estate
values, which greatly affect the market values of both
Woodbridge and BFC, are very depressed and volatile and neither
company is expected to be profitable in 2009.
Ewing noted that the future profitability of Woodbridge, whose
major asset is land (46.6%), is dependent on a substantial
recovery of real estate values and that, similarly, the ability
of BankAtlantic to return to profitability will depend on a
stabilization of the economy and credit markets and a decline in
nonperforming assets. Because of the volatility and downward
trend of real estate values, it is not feasible, in Ewings
opinion, to calculate a meaningful exchange ratio based on the
market values of the real estate and real estate related assets
of the two companies. Similarly, as neither company had
operating profits in 2008, nor is either expected to be
profitable in 2009, an exchange ratio based on current or
projected earnings is also not meaningful as the projected
earnings for both companies for 2010 and beyond will depend on
the timing of a recovery of the real estate markets.
Book values are often used in valuing banks and other financial
institutions. Ewing calculated the book value for Woodbridge and
BFC as of March 31, 2009 and confirmed the exchange ratio
based on the book value of the two companies of 3.47 shares
of BFCs Class A Common Stock for each share of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock (other than shares
owned by BFC). Ewing observed that the book values of the two
companies provided the best method for determining the exchange
ratio for the proposed merger.
Woodbridge and BFC both have public markets for the shares of
their Class A Common Stock, as each trades on the Pink
Sheets. The average trading volume of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock and BFCs Class A Common
Stock is 6,000 shares per day and 2,000 shares per
day, respectively. While the market values of thinly traded
stocks do not always reflect the fair market value of a
companys shares, they reflect, over time, the major trends
in values created either by economic conditions
and/or the
operations of the companies.
Ewing observed that the average price of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock and BFCs Class A Common
Stock during June 2009 was $1.32 and $0.41, respectively,
reflecting a ratio of 3.22. Ewing noted
80
that this ratio supports the exchange ratio of 3.47 shares
of BFCs Class A Common Stock for each share of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock (other than shares
owned by BFC) which was based on the book values of the
companies.
The market capitalization of Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock as of March 31, 2009 was $23,660,000 ($1.40
per share x 16,900,332 shares), and the market
capitalization of BFCs Class A Common Stock as of
June 17, 2009 was $18,052,000 ($0.40 per share x
45,129,493 shares).
Accounting
for the Merger
Ewing observed that FAS-160 addresses a change in ownership
interest by controlling corporations, which applies to this
proposed transaction and it simplifies the accounting for the
transaction. The effect of the merger on BFCs balance
sheet is to transfer the book value of Woodbridge as of the
effective date of the merger from non-controlling
interest to BFCs shareholders equity account.
Approximately 90,000,000 shares of BFCs common stock
will be outstanding after consummation of the merger with a pro
forma book value of approximately $2.30 per share.
Woodbridges shareholders (other than BFC) are expected to
hold an approximately 50% equity ownership interest in BFC
following the merger. As the outstanding options of both
companies are substantially out of the money, no
consideration has been given to them in these calculations.
Ewings
Views of the Projected Advantages of the Merger to
Woodbridge
Ewing observed that the advantages of the proposed merger to
Woodbridge and its shareholders are as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
That, as a result of the merger, Woodbridges shareholders
would be exchanging their ownership interest in
Woodbridges various assets for an ownership interest in
BFCs various assets, which (other than its investment in
Woodbridge) consist primarily of its investments in BankAtlantic
Bancorp and Benihana. The resulting diversification of
Woodbridges interests would appear to be consistent with
Woodbridges boards stated objective of
diversification.
|
|
|
|
The economic recovery of the land development assets of Core is
likely to take longer than the recovery of BankAtlantic. If so,
the merger will better position Woodbridges shareholders
to benefit earlier and from more diversified revenue producing
sources when an improving economy occurs.
|
|
|
|
The two companies are under common control and many staff
functions have already been combined. There should be nominal
operating savings created by the merger in the form of reduced
accounting, legal and SEC fees.
|
|
|
|
The resulting larger number of shares and shareholders may
improve the marketability of BFCs Class A Common
Stock.
|
Other
Matters Relating to Ewings Opinion
The preparation of a fairness opinion involves various
determinations as to the most appropriate methods of financial
analysis and the application of those methods to the particular
circumstance. In arriving at its opinion, Ewing did not
attribute any particular weight to any one factor but rather
made judgments as to the relative significance of each. Ewing
believes that its opinion must be considered as a whole and that
not doing so could create a misleading view of the process
underlying its opinion.
In arriving at its opinion, Ewing assumed and relied upon the
accuracy and completeness of the financial and other information
provided to it by the companies, and Ewing did not perform any
independent verification of such information. Ewing relied upon
the assurances of the management of the companies that they are
not aware of any circumstances that would make such information
inaccurate or misleading. Ewing did not conduct a physical
inspection of the properties and facilities of Woodbridge.
Ewings opinion, necessarily, is based upon the economic
conditions as they existed as of the date of the opinion.
81
In the ordinary course of business and in compliance with
applicable laws, certain of Ewings affiliates, as well as
investment funds in which Ewing or its affiliates may have
financial interests, may acquire, hold or sell long or short
positions, or trade or otherwise effect transactions, in debt,
equity and other securities and financial instruments (including
bank loans and other obligations) of, or investments in,
Woodbridge, BFC, any other party that may be involved in the
merger and their respective affiliates.
Woodbridge paid Ewing a fee in the aggregate amount of $150,000
for Ewings services as financial advisor to
Woodbridges special committee with respect to the merger
and the delivery of its fairness opinion to Woodbridges
special committee and board of directors. Woodbridge has also
agreed to reimburse Ewing for certain of its reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred from time to time in connection
with its services as Woodbridges financial advisor with
respect to the merger and to indemnify Ewing and its affiliates
for certain liabilities that may arise in connection with
Ewings engagement. Ewing may in the future provide
investment banking and other financial services to Woodbridge
for which they will receive compensation.
Operations
of Woodbridge and BFC Prior to and After the Effective Time of
the Merger
Both Woodbridge and BFC expect to, and have agreed in the merger
agreement to, conduct their respective businesses prior to the
effective time of the merger in the usual and ordinary course,
consistent with their existing business and investment
strategies and operational plans. With respect to Woodbridge,
this may include, among other things, the continued pursuit of
investments and acquisitions within or outside of the real
estate industry and providing support to its existing
investments, including additional investments in affiliates such
as Bluegreen, among others. Further, BFC expects to continue
providing support for its controlled subsidiaries with a view to
the improved performance of the organization as a whole, and
this business strategy may include additional investments in its
controlled subsidiaries such as BankAtlantic Bancorp.
Following the merger, BFC expects that both it and Woodbridge
(as a wholly owned subsidiary of BFC) will continue to conduct
their respective businesses in the usual and ordinary course.
BFC intends to allocate resources within the consolidated group
among BFCs investments and subsidiaries in a manner which
its board of directors believes to be beneficial to BFCs
shareholders. It is currently anticipated that BFC will make
additional investments in BankAtlantic Bancorp, whether in
BankAtlantic Bancorps previously announced
$100 million rights offering to its shareholders or
otherwise, and may also make additional investments in
Bluegreen, Core Communities or Benihana.
Interests
of Certain Persons in the Merger
In considering the recommendation of the board of directors of
BFC to vote in favor of the merger and the related transactions
and the recommendation of the board of directors of Woodbridge
to vote in favor of the merger agreement, shareholders should be
aware that certain directors and executive officers of each of
BFC and Woodbridge have interests in the merger that are
different from, or are in addition to, the interests of
BFCs and Woodbridges respective shareholders,
generally. The boards of directors of each of BFC and Woodbridge
and the Woodbridge special committee were aware of these
interests during their deliberations on the merits of the merger
agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and in
determining to make their recommendations.
Interests
of Alan B. Levan, John E. Abdo and their
Affiliates
Alan B. Levan, the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
President of BFC, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Woodbridge and BankAtlantic Bancorp and Chairman of Bluegreen,
John E. Abdo, the Vice Chairman of each of BFC, Woodbridge,
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Bluegreen, and their respective
affiliates collectively beneficially own approximately 27.7% of
the outstanding shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock
and approximately 87.4% of the outstanding shares of BFCs
Class B Common Stock (in each case, including shares which
may be acquired by them pursuant to the exercise of stock
options), representing approximately 74.2% of the general voting
power and approximately 37.4% of the total common equity of BFC.
After completion of the merger, Alan B. Levan and John E. Abdo,
together with their affiliates, are expected to beneficially own
approximately 12.9% of the outstanding shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock
82
and approximately 87.4% of the outstanding shares of BFCs
Class B Common Stock (in each case, including shares which
may be acquired by them pursuant to the exercise of stock
options), which would represent in the aggregate approximately
71.0% of the general voting power and 19.0% of the total common
equity of BFC.
Alan B. Levan is also the father of Jarett S. Levan, who, as
described below, is anticipated to be appointed to BFCs
board of directors in connection with the merger.
Appointments
to BFCs Board of Directors and Management
Team
As described in further detail below in Board of Directors
and Executive Officers of BFC Following the Merger, in
connection with the merger, BFC has agreed to cause
Messrs. James Blosser, Darwin Dornbush, S. Lawrence
Kahn, III, Alan J. Levy, Joel Levy, William Nicholson and
William Scherer, all of whom are members of the board of
directors of Woodbridge, as well as Seth Wise, the President of
Woodbridge, and Jarett S. Levan, the son of Alan B. Levan and
the President of BankAtlantic Bancorp and Chief Executive
Officer and President of BankAtlantic, to be appointed to
BFCs board of directors to serve for a term expiring at
BFCs 2010 annual meeting of shareholders. In addition,
Mr. Wise will serve as Executive Vice President of BFC
effective upon consummation of the merger.
Anticipated
Issuance of BFC Stock Options; Compensation for Service of
Behalf of BFC
It is anticipated that some or all of the directors and
executive officers of Woodbridge, including Alan B. Levan and
John E. Abdo, will be granted BFC stock options or other
equity-based compensation awards of BFC following the merger.
Further, while the Woodbridge stock options, if any, held by
these individuals will be canceled, those stock options
currently have exercise prices which are far greater than the
market price of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock. It
is expected that the new BFC stock options granted to them will
have exercise prices equal to the closing market price of
BFCs Class A Common Stock on the date of grant.
Additionally, following the merger, BFCs directors and
executive officers will continue to receive compensation,
including equity-based compensation, from BFC for their services
and, as permitted by the terms of BFCs stock incentive
plan, it is contemplated that BFCs compensation committee
will, following consummation of the merger, consider BFCs
outstanding stock options with a view to re-pricing some or all
of the BFC stock options currently held by BFCs directors
and executive officers or cancelling those stock options in
connection with the issuance of new stock options having more
favorable terms, including lower exercise prices.
Indemnification
and Insurance Provisions in the Merger Agreement
The merger agreement provides that the Surviving Company will
indemnify, defend and hold harmless each present and former
director and officer of Woodbridge for each such directors
and officers liabilities with respect to acts or omissions
occurring prior to the effective time of the merger, to the same
extent as provided for under the FBCA and in Woodbridges
Articles of Incorporation or By-laws.
The merger agreement also provides that for six years after the
effective time of the merger, the Surviving Company will
maintain or cause to be maintained in effect the current
policies of directors and officers liability
insurance maintained by Woodbridge or a substitute policy of at
least the same coverage and amount as, and containing terms and
conditions which are substantially no less advantageous than,
the Woodbridge policy, in each case, with respect to claims
arising from facts or events which occurred before the effective
time of the merger. Alternatively, the Surviving Company may
obtain single limit tail directors and officers
liability insurance coverage providing at least the same
coverage and amount as, and containing terms and conditions
which are substantially no less advantageous than, the
Woodbridge policy for such six-year period with respect to
claims arising from facts or events which occurred before the
effective time of the merger.
Articles
of Incorporation and By-laws of BFC Following the
Merger
In connection with the merger, BFCs Articles of
Incorporation will be amended to increase the authorized number
of shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock from
100,000,000 to 150,000,000. In addition, BFCs board of
directors has approved amendments to BFCs By-laws which,
effective upon consummation of the merger, will increase the
maximum number of members of the board of directors of BFC from
12 to 15
83
and provide that each director elected or appointed to
BFCs board of directors on or after the effective date of
the merger will serve for a term expiring at BFCs next
annual meeting of shareholders. As a result of the latter
amendment (and subject to any future amendments), following
BFCs 2012 annual meeting of shareholders, BFCs board
of directors will no longer be divided into multiple classes
serving staggered terms. Shareholder approval of the amendments
to BFCs By-laws is not required. The Articles of Amendment
to BFCs Articles of Incorporation and the Amended and
Restated By-laws of BFC to be adopted in connection with the
merger are as set forth on Annexes D and E hereto,
respectively, and you are urged to read them carefully.
Board of
Directors and Executive Officers of BFC Following the
Merger
Currently, there are five persons serving on the board of
directors of BFC, each of whom will continue to serve as
directors of BFC following the merger. A summary of the
background and experience of each of these individuals is set
forth under Information About BFC
Management Board of Directors. Additionally,
in connection with the merger, BFC has agreed to cause each of
Messrs. James Blosser, Darwin Dornbush, S. Lawrence
Kahn, III, Alan J. Levy, Joel Levy, William Nicholson and
William Scherer, the seven current directors of Woodbridge who
are not also directors of BFC, as well as Seth M. Wise, the
President of Woodbridge, and Jarett S. Levan, the President of
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Chief Executive Officer and President
of BankAtlantic, to be appointed to the board of directors of
BFC to serve for a term expiring at BFCs 2010 annual
meeting of shareholders.
Upon the completion of the merger, the executive officers of BFC
in office immediately prior to the effective time of the merger
will be the executive officers of BFC. In addition,
Mr. Wise will serve as Executive Vice President of BFC
effective upon consummation of the merger.
A summary of the background and experience of each of the seven
current Woodbridge directors to be appointed to the board of
directors of BFC in connection with the merger is set forth
under Information About Woodbridge
Management Board of Directors. A summary of
the background and experience of Mr. Wise is set forth
under Information About Woodbridge
Management Executive Officers. A summary of
the background and experience of Mr. Jarett S. Levan is set
forth under Information About BFC
Management Board of Directors.
Ownership
of BFC Following the Merger
Based on the number of outstanding shares of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock (other than shares owned by BFC) and
BFCs Class A Common Stock, and assuming no holders of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock choose to exercise
and perfect their appraisal rights, immediately following the
merger, Woodbridges shareholders (other than BFC) will own
approximately 54% and BFCs shareholders will own
approximately 46% of the then-outstanding shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock, and each of Woodbridges
shareholders (other than BFC) and BFCs shareholders will
own approximately 50% of BFCs total common equity.
Immediately following the merger, shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock will
represent in the aggregate 22% and 78%, respectively, of the
general voting power of BFC and approximately 92% and 8%,
respectively, of the total outstanding common equity of BFC.
Termination
of Woodbridges Shareholder Rights Plan; Anticipated
Adoption by BFC of Shareholder Rights Plan
Woodbridge currently has in place a shareholder rights plan
which was adopted in an effort to preserve Woodbridges
ability to utilize its net operating loss carryforwards to
offset future taxable income. The shareholder rights plan was
designed to prevent Woodbridge from experiencing an
ownership change for purposes of Section 382 of
the Code by causing substantial dilution to any person or group
that acquires 5% or more of the outstanding shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock without the approval
of Woodbridges board of directors. Woodbridges board
of directors has agreed to exempt the merger from the operation
of the shareholder rights plan and committed to exercise its
right to terminate the shareholder rights plan at the effective
time of the merger.
In connection with the termination of Woodbridges
shareholder rights plan, BFC intends to adopt a shareholder
rights plan substantially similar to the one in place at
Woodbridge in an effort to preserve
84
available net operating loss carryforwards for potential
utilization as an offset against future taxable income. As
contemplated, the plan, if triggered, would result in
substantial dilution to any person or group that acquires 5% or
more of BFCs outstanding common stock without the approval
of BFCs board of directors.
Trading
of BFCs Class A Common Stock
BFCs Class A Common Stock is currently listed for
trading, and it is anticipated that the shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock to be issued in the merger will be
listed for trading, on the Pink Sheets under the symbol
BFCF.PK. In the future, BFC may apply for its
Class A Common Stock to be listed on the New York
Stock Exchange or the NASDAQ Stock Market if its Class A
Common Stock meets the requirements for listing on either of
those exchanges.
Deregistration
of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock
If the merger is consummated, all of the shares of Woodbridge
Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock will be
canceled, and Woodbridges Class A Common Stock will
no longer be listed for trading on the Pink Sheets and will be
deregistered under the Exchange Act.
Appraisal
Rights
Holders of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock who do
not vote to approve the merger agreement and who properly assert
and exercise appraisal rights with respect to their shares will
be entitled to appraisal rights in connection with the merger
under the FBCA. Under the FBCA, BFCs shareholders will not
be entitled to appraisal rights in connection with the merger.
Each holder of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock who
complies with the procedures set forth in Sections 607.1301
to 607.1333 of the FBCA relating to appraisal rights is entitled
to receive in cash the fair value of his, her or its shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock. A holder of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock must strictly comply
with the procedures set forth in such sections. Failure to
follow these procedures will result in a termination or waiver
of a shareholders appraisal rights.
To assert appraisal rights, a holder of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock must not vote in favor of the approval
of the merger agreement and must provide written notice to
Woodbridge before the vote is taken at the Woodbridge annual
meeting indicating that such shareholder intends to demand
payment if the merger is effectuated. Such written notification
must be received by Woodbridge before the vote on the merger
agreement is taken at the Woodbridge annual meeting and must be
delivered either in person or by mail (certified mail, return
receipt requested, being the recommended form of transmittal) to
Woodbridge Holdings Corporation, 2100 West Cypress Creek
Road, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309, Attention:
Linda Drapos, Secretary. All such notices must be signed in
the same manner as the shares are registered on the books of
Woodbridge. If a holder of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock has not provided written notice of his, her or its intent
to demand payment before the vote is taken at the Woodbridge
annual meeting, the shareholder will be deemed to have waived
his, her or its appraisal rights.
Within ten days after the date the merger becomes effective, the
Surviving Company will provide each former holder of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock who has properly
provided a notice of intent to demand payment of fair value a
written appraisal notice and form, which will indicate the
Surviving Companys estimate of the per share fair value of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock, as well as a copy
of Woodbridges financial statements and a copy of
Sections 607.1301 to 607.1333 of the FBCA.
A holder of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock
asserting appraisal rights must execute and return the form to
the Surviving Company and deposit the holders certificates
in accordance with the terms of the notice before the date
specified in the appraisal notice, which will not be fewer than
40 or more than 60 days after the date on which the
appraisal notice and form were sent to the holder. A holder of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock who deposits shares
in accordance with the assertion of appraisal rights has no
further rights as a shareholder of Woodbridge, but only has the
right to receive fair value for the shares in
accordance with the appraisal procedures, unless the appraisal
demand is withdrawn. The fair value of the shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock held by a
shareholder exercising appraisal rights means the value of such
shares determined immediately preceding the consummation of the
merger excluding any appreciation or
85
depreciation in anticipation of the merger and could be more
than, less than or equal to the value of the shares of
BFCs Class A Common Stock that the shareholder would
otherwise have received in connection with the merger.
A holder of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock who does
not execute and return the form and deposit his, her or its
certificates by the date set forth in the appraisal notice will
no longer be entitled to appraisal rights, will be bound by the
terms of the merger agreement and, pursuant to the merger
agreement, will be entitled to receive 3.47 shares of
BFCs Class A Common Stock in exchange for each share
of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock owned by such
holder. A holder of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock
who complies with the requirements and wishes to withdraw from
the appraisal process may do so by notifying the Surviving
Company in writing before the date set forth in the appraisal
notice as the due date to execute and return the form. A
shareholder who fails to withdraw from the appraisal process may
not thereafter withdraw without the Surviving Companys
written consent.
A holder of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock must
assert appraisal rights with respect to all of the shares
registered in his, her or its name, except that a record
shareholder may assert appraisal rights as to fewer than all of
the shares registered in the record shareholders name but
which are owned by a beneficial shareholder, if the record
shareholder objects with respect to all shares owned by the
beneficial shareholder. A record shareholder must notify the
Surviving Company in writing of the name and address of each
beneficial shareholder on whose behalf appraisal rights are
being asserted. A beneficial shareholder may assert appraisal
rights as to any shares held on behalf of the shareholder only
if the shareholder submits to the Surviving Company the record
shareholders written consent to the assertion of such
appraisal rights before the date specified in the appraisal
notice and does so with respect to all shares that are
beneficially owned by the beneficial shareholder.
If a holder of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock
timely accepts the Surviving Companys offer to pay the
fair value of the shares of Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock as set forth in the appraisal notice, payment will
be made within 90 days after the Surviving Company receives
the form from the holder. A holder of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock who is dissatisfied with the offer
must include in his, her or its returned form a demand for
payment of that holders estimate of the fair value of the
shares plus interest, otherwise the holder will be entitled to
payment of only the amount offered. Interest shall accrue from
the effective date of the merger until the date of payment at
the interest rate on judgments in Florida on the effective date
of the merger, as determined by the court. Once the Surviving
Company has made payment of an agreed upon value to a holder of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock, such holder will
cease to have any interest in his, her or its shares.
If the Surviving Company and a holder of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock who has exercised appraisal rights are
unable to agree on the fair value of the shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock owned by such
holder, the Surviving Company would be required to file an
appraisal action within 60 days after receiving the payment
demand in a court of competent jurisdiction in Broward County,
Florida, requesting that the fair value of the shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock be determined. If
the Surviving Company fails to file such proceeding within the
60-day
period, any shareholder who has exercised appraisal rights may
do so in the name of Woodbridge. All such shareholders, other
than shareholders who have agreed upon a value with the
Surviving Company, are deemed to be parties to the proceeding.
In such proceeding, the court may, if it so elects, appoint one
or more persons as appraisers to receive evidence and recommend
a decision on the question of fair value. The Surviving Company
shall pay each shareholder that is a party to such proceeding
the amount found to be due within ten days after final
determination of the proceeding. Upon payment of such judgment,
all such shareholders will cease to have any interest with
respect to their shares of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock.
The court in an appraisal proceeding will determine the cost and
expense of such proceeding, and such costs and expenses will be
assessed against the Surviving Company. However, all or any part
of such costs and expenses may be apportioned and assessed
against all or some of the shareholders that are parties to the
proceeding in such amount as the court deems equitable if the
court determines that such shareholders acted arbitrarily,
vexatiously or not in good faith with respect to their appraisal
rights. The court may also assess the
86
fees and expenses of counsel and experts for the respective
parties in the amounts the court finds equitable against the
Surviving Company if the court finds that the Surviving Company
did not substantially comply with the requirements applicable to
it under Sections 607.1320 and 607.1322 of the FBCA, or,
against any party which the court finds acted arbitrarily,
vexatiously, or not in good faith with respect to the appraisal
rights. In the event the Surviving Company fails to make any
required payments, the shareholders to which such payments are
due may sue directly for the amount owed and, to the extent
successful, will be entitled to recover all costs and expenses
of the suit, including attorneys fees.
BFCs obligation to consummate the merger is conditioned
upon holders of not more than 10% of the outstanding shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock exercising, or
remaining entitled to exercise, appraisal rights for their
shares.
The foregoing discussion is not a complete statement of the
law pertaining to appraisal rights under the FBCA and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of
Sections 607.1301 to 607.1333 of the FBCA, which is
attached to this joint proxy statement/prospectus as
Annex F. The foregoing discussion does not constitute any
legal or other advice nor does it constitute a recommendation
that holders of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock
exercise or waive their appraisal rights.
Material
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger
General
The following summary discusses the material U.S. federal
income tax consequences of the merger to U.S. holders of
shares of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock. This
discussion is based upon the Code, Treasury regulations,
administrative rulings and judicial decisions currently in
effect, all of which are subject to change, possibly with
retroactive effect. Any such change could affect the accuracy of
this discussion. This discussion assumes that holders of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock hold their shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock, and will hold their
shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock, as capital
assets within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code.
Further, this discussion does not constitute tax advice and does
not address all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation
that may be relevant to a particular holder of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock in light of his, her or its personal
investment circumstances or to holders of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock subject to special treatment under the
U.S. federal income tax laws such as:
|
|
|
|
|
insurance companies;
|
|
|
|
tax-exempt organizations;
|
|
|
|
dealers in securities or foreign currency;
|
|
|
|
banks or trusts;
|
|
|
|
persons that hold shares of Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock as part of a straddle, a hedge against currency
risk, a constructive sale or conversion transaction;
|
|
|
|
persons that have a functional currency other than the
U.S. dollar;
|
|
|
|
investors in pass-through entities;
|
|
|
|
holders who acquired their shares of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock through the exercise of options or
otherwise as compensation or through a tax-qualified retirement
plan; or
|
|
|
|
holders of options or restricted shares granted under any
Woodbridge benefit plan.
|
Furthermore, this discussion does not consider the potential
effects of any state, local or foreign tax laws.
You should consult your own tax advisor regarding the
specific tax consequences to you of the merger, including the
applicability and effect of federal, state, local and foreign
income and other tax laws, in light of your particular
circumstances.
For purposes of this discussion, you are a
U.S. Holder if you beneficially own shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock and you are:
|
|
|
|
|
a citizen or resident of the United States;
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
a corporation or other entity taxable as a corporation created
or organized under the laws of the United States or any of its
political subdivisions;
|
|
|
|
a trust, if a United States court is able to exercise primary
supervision over the administration of the trust and one or more
United States fiduciaries have the authority to control all
substantial decisions of the trust; or
|
|
|
|
an estate that is subject to United States federal income tax on
its income regardless of its source.
|
Neither BFC nor Woodbridge has requested a ruling from the
United States Internal Revenue Service (the IRS)
with respect to any of the U.S. federal income tax
consequences of the merger and, as a result, there can be no
assurance that the IRS will not disagree with any of the
conclusions described below. Stearns Weaver will issue an
opinion to BFC and Woodbridge as of the date on which the merger
is consummated to the effect that the merger will qualify as a
tax-free reorganization under Section 368(a) of
the Code and that BFC and Woodbridge will each be a party to
that reorganization under Section 368(b) of the
Code. This opinion will be given in reliance on customary
representations of BFC and Woodbridge and customary assumptions
as to certain factual matters and will not bind the courts or
the IRS, nor will it preclude the IRS from adopting a position
contrary to those expressed in the opinion.
Holders of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock who
Receive Shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock in the
Merger
Exchange of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock for
BFCs Class A Common
Stock. U.S. Holders who receive shares of
BFCs Class A Common Stock in exchange for shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock will not recognize
gain or loss in the merger. Such U.S. Holders
aggregate tax basis in the shares of BFCs Class A
Common Stock received in connection with the merger will be
equal to the aggregate tax basis of the shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock surrendered, and
his, her or its holding period in shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock will include his, her or its holding
period in the shares of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock surrendered.
Information Reporting and Backup
Withholding. A U.S. Holder may be subject to
information reporting with respect to the cash received in lieu
of a fractional share of BFCs Class A Common Stock. A
U.S. Holder may also be subject to backup withholding
unless (i) such holder is an exempt holder (such as a
corporation or a tax-exempt organization), (ii) such holder
furnishes a correct taxpayer identification number and certifies
that he, she or it is not subject to backup withholding on the
substitute
Form W-9
or successor form or (iii) such holder is otherwise exempt
from backup withholding. A U.S. Holder may credit any
amount withheld under the backup withholding rules against his,
her or its U.S. federal income tax liability and may seek a
refund of any excess amount withheld under the backup
withholding rules by filing the appropriate form with the IRS.
Miscellaneous. Under Treasury
Regulation Section 1.368-3T,
if a U.S. Holder owned immediately before the merger either
(i) five percent or more, by vote or value, of the publicly
traded stock of Woodbridge or (ii) securities of Woodbridge
with a tax basis of $1.0 million or more, such
U.S. Holder will be required to file a statement with his,
her or its U.S. federal income tax return for the year of
the consummation of the merger. That statement must set forth
such U.S. Holders tax basis in, and the fair market
value of, the shares of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock that he, she or it surrendered pursuant to the merger, the
date of the merger, and the name and employer identification
number of BFC and Woodbridge, and the U.S. Holder will be
required to retain permanent records of these facts.
Treatment
of the Companies
No gain or loss will be recognized by BFC or Woodbridge as a
result of the merger.
Cash
Received by Shareholders who Exercise Appraisal
Rights
An eligible holder of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock that asserts and exercises his, her or its appraisal
rights should generally recognize capital gain or loss in an
amount equal to the difference between the amount realized and
the tax basis of such holders shares of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock. Such gain or loss will be a long-term
capital gain or loss if the holders holding period is more
than one year from
88
the date that the holder asserts and exercises his, her or its
appraisal rights. In addition, a portion of any proceeds
received following the effective time of the merger may be
characterized as interest, taxable as ordinary income, thus
reducing the amount of such capital gain or increasing the
amount of such capital loss (as the case may be). Holders of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock are encouraged to
consult their tax advisors as to the tax consequences of
asserting and exercising appraisal rights.
Anticipated
Accounting Treatment
The merger will be accounted for as an equity transaction by BFC
for financial reporting and accounting purposes under
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The results
of operations of Woodbridge will continue to be included in the
consolidated financial statements of BFC.
Regulatory
Matters
BFC must comply with applicable federal and state securities
laws in connection with the issuance of shares of its
Class A Common Stock in connection with the merger and the
filing of this joint proxy statement/prospectus with the SEC.
As a unitary savings bank holding company, BFC is subject to
regulation by the OTS. Among other things, ownership of
control of BFC is subject to applicable OTS
regulations. Under the applicable regulations of the OTS, if,
after giving effect to the number of shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock a shareholder of Woodbridge receives
in the merger, that shareholder, directly or indirectly, or
through one or more subsidiaries, or acting in concert with one
or more other persons or entities, owns (i) more than 10%
of BFCs common stock and one or more specified control
factors exist, then the shareholder will be determined, subject
to the right of rebuttal, to have acquired control of BFC or
(ii) more than 25% of BFCs common stock, then the
shareholder will be conclusively determined to have acquired
control of BFC, regardless of whether any control factors exist.
Accordingly, subject to certain limited exceptions, any
Woodbridge shareholder who receives shares in the merger which
causes its ownership of BFCs common stock to exceed such
thresholds will be required to file an application, notice or
rebuttal with the OTS. Pending favorable action by the OTS on
such application, notice, rebuttal, the shareholders
actions with respect to BFC will be limited as set forth in the
applicable regulation. If the OTS disapproves of the
application, notice or rebuttal, then the shareholder will be
required to divest such portion of its shares of BFCs
common stock necessary to cause its ownership to fall below the
applicable regulatory threshold. Woodbridges shareholders
should consult with their legal counsel regarding any regulatory
limitations on their ownership of BFCs common stock that
may be applicable to them, including whether they are required
to submit an application, notice or rebuttal to the OTS relating
to their share ownership.
Resale of
BFCs Class A Common Stock
The shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock to be
received by holders of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock in connection with the merger will be registered under the
Securities Act and, except as described in this section, may be
freely traded without restriction. BFCs registration
statement on
Form S-4,
of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part,
does not cover the resale of shares of BFCs Class A
Common Stock to be received in connection with the merger by
persons who are deemed to be affiliates of Woodbridge or BFC.
The shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock to be issued
in the merger and received by persons who are deemed to be
affiliates of Woodbridge or BFC may be resold by them only in
transactions permitted by the resale provisions of Rule 145
under the Securities Act or as otherwise permitted under the
Securities Act. Persons who are deemed to be affiliates of
Woodbridge or BFC include individuals or entities that control,
are controlled by, or are under common control with Woodbridge
or BFC and may include officers, directors and principal
shareholders of Woodbridge or BFC.
89
THE
MERGER AGREEMENT
The following summary describes certain material provisions
of the merger agreement, which is attached to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus as Annex A and is incorporated by
reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus. This
summary may not contain all the information about the merger
agreement that is important to you and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to the merger agreement. You are
encouraged to carefully read the merger agreement in its
entirety.
Form of
the Merger
Subject to the terms and conditions of the merger agreement and
in accordance with Florida law, at the effective time of the
merger, Woodbridge will be merged with and into Merger Sub, a
wholly owned subsidiary of BFC. As a result of the merger, the
separate corporate existence of Woodbridge will cease, and
Merger Sub will survive and continue as a direct, wholly owned
subsidiary of BFC.
Effective
Time of the Merger
The consummation of the merger will occur as promptly as
practicable after the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions
to consummation of the merger set forth in the merger agreement.
The merger will become effective as of 5:00 p.m., Eastern
Time, on the date on which the merger is consummated.
Consideration
to be Received Pursuant to the Merger
Upon consummation of the merger, each holder of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock (other than BFC and
holders who exercise and perfect their appraisal rights) will be
entitled to receive 3.47 shares of BFCs Class A
Common Stock for each share of Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock that such holder owns. All of the shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock and Class B
Common Stock held by BFC will be canceled in the merger,
reflecting Florida law which provides that BFC cannot own shares
of its own stock. BFC will not issue fractional shares of its
Class A Common Stock in the merger, but instead, the
aggregate number of shares of BFCs Class A Common
Stock to which holders of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock will be entitled to receive will be rounded up to the next
largest whole number.
Treatment
of Woodbridge Restricted Stock Awards and Stock
Options
Upon consummation of the merger, Woodbridges Amended and
Restated 2003 Stock Incentive Plan will be assumed by BFC and
all outstanding restricted stock awards issued thereunder will
be converted into restricted stock awards of shares of
BFCs Class A Common Stock on the same terms and
conditions and with the same restrictions, but with appropriate
adjustments made to the number of shares subject to such
restricted stock awards based on the exchange ratio of
3.47 shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock for
each share of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock.
All options to purchase shares of Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock outstanding at the effective time of the merger
will be canceled in connection with the merger, and the holders
thereof will not receive any consideration as a result of such
cancellation. In agreeing to this treatment of Woodbridges
options, Woodbridges special committee and board of
directors considered the fact that, as of the date of the merger
agreement, all such options were, and, for the foreseeable
future, all such options are expected to be,
out-of-the-money
with exercise prices greatly exceeding the current market price
of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock. However, it is
anticipated that some or all of the directors and executive
officers of Woodbridge will be granted BFC stock options or
other equity-based compensation awards of BFC following the
merger.
Procedures
for Exchange of Certificates
The merger agreement contemplates that, as promptly as
practicable following the effective time of the merger, but in
no event later than three business days after the effective time
of the merger, the exchange agent for the merger will mail to
each record holder of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock immediately prior to the effective time of the merger
(other than BFC and holders of Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock who have exercised and perfected their appraisal
rights) a letter of transmittal and instructions for
surrendering
90
and exchanging the record holders certificates
representing shares of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock. The merger agreement provides that, upon surrender of
such stock certificates for exchange to the exchange agent,
together with a duly signed letter of transmittal and such other
customary documents as may be required, the holder of the
Woodbridge Class A Common Stock certificates will be
entitled to receive, and the exchange agent will deliver to such
holder, (i) certificates representing the number of whole
shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock to which such
holder is entitled and (ii) any dividends or other
distributions declared or paid on shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock after the effective time of the merger.
After the effective time of the merger, all holders of
certificates representing shares of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock that were outstanding immediately
prior to the effective time of the merger will cease to have any
rights as shareholders of Woodbridge, and until such
certificates are surrendered, each such certificate will
evidence only the right to receive the merger consideration and
any dividends or other distributions declared or paid on shares
of BFCs Class A Common Stock after the effective time
of the merger. In addition, no transfer of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock after the effective time of the merger
will be registered on the stock transfer books of Woodbridge.
If any certificate representing shares of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock has been lost, stolen or destroyed, as
a condition to the delivery of the merger consideration in
exchange therefor, the owner of such certificate must deliver an
affidavit claiming that such certificate has been lost, stolen
or destroyed and, if requested by BFC, post a bond in such
amount as BFC may reasonably direct as indemnity against any
claim that may be made with respect to that certificate.
Certificates representing shares of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock should not be surrendered for exchange
before the effective time of the merger and should be sent only
pursuant to instructions mailed to holders of such certificates
by the exchange agent, which the merger agreement provides will
be mailed to such holders as promptly as practicable following
the effective time of the merger, but in no event later than
three business days after the effective time of the merger. In
all cases, the certificates representing shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock and dividends or other distributions
declared or paid on shares of BFCs Class A Common
Stock after the effective time of the merger will be delivered
only in accordance with the procedures set forth in the letter
of transmittal and exchange instructions provided by the
exchange agent.
The merger agreement contemplates that the exchange agent will
deliver to BFC any certificates representing shares of
BFCs Class A Common Stock and any funds which have
not been disbursed to holders of certificates representing
shares of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock as of nine
months after the effective time of the merger. Any holders of
certificates representing shares of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock who have not surrendered such
certificates in compliance with the above-described procedures
may thereafter look only to BFC for certificates representing
shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock and any dividends
or distributions with respect to such shares. If any certificate
representing shares of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock are not surrendered prior to the date that is seven years
after the effective time of the merger (or immediately prior to
such earlier date on which any merger consideration would
otherwise escheat to, or become the property of, any
governmental entity), any certificates representing shares of
BFCs Class A Common Stock and dividends or
distributions with respect thereto that the holder of the
certificate representing shares of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock would otherwise have been entitled to
receive will, to the extent permitted by applicable law, become
the property of BFC, free and clear of all claims or interest.
Conditions
to Consummation of the Merger
Each of BFC and Woodbridge is required to consummate the merger
only if specific conditions are satisfied or waived, including
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the approval of the merger and the related transactions and the
merger agreement, respectively, by BFCs and
Woodbridges shareholders;
|
|
|
|
the absence of any legal restraints or prohibitions preventing
the completion of the merger or litigation or other proceeding
seeking to enjoin or prohibit the merger;
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
the declaration by the SEC that the registration statement of
which this joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part is
effective and the absence of any stop order or proceeding,
initiated or threatened in writing by the SEC, suspending or
threatening to suspend such effectiveness;
|
|
|
|
the receipt of all consents, approvals, assignments and
authorizations reasonably necessary to consummate the merger and
continue in full force and effect certain material contracts to
which Woodbridge is a party; and
|
|
|
|
the receipt by BFC and Woodbridge from Stearns Weaver of an
opinion, dated as of the date on which the merger is
consummated, stating that the merger will be treated for
U.S. federal income tax purposes as a
reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code.
|
The obligation of BFC to consummate the merger is subject to the
satisfaction or waiver at or prior to the closing of the merger
of the following additional conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties of Woodbridge contained in
the merger agreement being true and correct, subject to certain
materiality qualifications;
|
|
|
|
the performance in all material respects by Woodbridge of all
obligations required to be performed by it under the merger
agreement;
|
|
|
|
the delivery by Woodbridge to BFC of a certificate, dated as of
the date on which the merger is consummated and signed by the
president and chief financial officer of Woodbridge, certifying
the satisfaction of each of the two foregoing conditions;
|
|
|
|
the fairness opinion of JMP Securities, BFCs financial
advisor, not being withdrawn, revoked or materially modified;
|
|
|
|
holders of not more than 10% of the outstanding shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock duly and validly
exercising, or remaining entitled to exercise, their appraisal
rights in accordance with the FBCA; and
|
|
|
|
Woodbridge not having recorded, or determining that it is
reasonably likely to record,
other-than-temporary
impairment charges in an aggregate amount greater than
$15 million.
|
The obligations of Woodbridge to consummate the merger are
subject to the satisfaction or waiver at or prior to the closing
of the merger of the following additional conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties of BFC contained in the
merger agreement being true and correct, subject to certain
materiality qualifications;
|
|
|
|
the performance in all material respects by BFC of all
obligations required to be performed by it under the merger
agreement;
|
|
|
|
the delivery by BFC to Woodbridge of a certificate, dated as of
the date on which the merger is consummated and signed by the
chief executive officer and chief financial officer of BFC,
certifying the satisfaction of each of the two foregoing
conditions;
|
|
|
|
the fairness opinion of Ewing, Woodbridges financial
advisor, not being withdrawn, revoked or materially
modified; and
|
|
|
|
BFC not having recorded, or determining that it is reasonably
likely to record,
other-than-temporary
impairment charges in an aggregate amount greater than
$15 million (except for
other-than-temporary
impairment charges relating to an asset owned by Woodbridge or
any of Woodbridges subsidiaries or relating to BFCs
investment in Woodbridge).
|
The board of directors of either BFC or Woodbridge may in its
sole discretion choose to waive any of the conditions to
consummation of the merger and choose to proceed to closing
notwithstanding that the condition waived has not been
fulfilled. No additional shareholder vote will be required in
connection with the waiver of a condition to consummation of the
merger.
92
Representations
and Warranties
The merger agreement contains customary representations and
warranties of each of BFC and Woodbridge, including
representations and warranties relating to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
organization, good standing and similar matters;
|
|
|
|
capitalization;
|
|
|
|
due authorization, execution, delivery and enforceability of the
merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby;
|
|
|
|
absence of conflicts with each such partys governing
documents, applicable laws and contracts;
|
|
|
|
documents filed with the SEC, including financial statements,
compliance with applicable SEC filing requirements and accuracy
of information contained in such documents;
|
|
|
|
absence of any event or occurrence of any condition since
March 31, 2009 that (i) has had or could reasonably be
expected to have a material adverse effect with respect to such
party, (ii) could reasonably be expected to render any of
the representations and warranties of such party contained in
the merger agreement incorrect or untrue as of the effective
time of the merger or (iii) would result in a violation of
the covenants of such party contained in the merger agreement
had such event or condition occurred after the date of the
merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
filing of tax returns and payment of taxes;
|
|
|
|
material contracts, and the enforceability of such contracts;
|
|
|
|
pending or threatened litigation;
|
|
|
|
engagement and payment of fees of brokers and finders;
|
|
|
|
accuracy of information supplied by such party in connection
with this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the registration
statement of which it is a part;
|
|
|
|
the qualification of the merger as a reorganization
under Section 368(a) of the Code;
|
|
|
|
the receipt of fairness opinions from BFCs and
Woodbridges respective financial advisors;
|
|
|
|
accuracy and sufficiency of information contained in the merger
agreement;
|
|
|
|
compliance with laws;
|
|
|
|
related party transactions;
|
|
|
|
insurance;
|
|
|
|
compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002;
|
|
|
|
certain business practices;
|
|
|
|
employee benefit plans; and
|
|
|
|
labor and employment matters.
|
Conduct
of Business by BFC and Woodbridge Prior to Consummation of the
Merger
BFC and Woodbridge have each agreed that, during the period from
the date of the merger agreement to the earlier of the
consummation of the merger and the termination of the merger
agreement, except as expressly contemplated by the merger
agreement or consented to in writing by BFC or Woodbridge, as
the case may be, each of BFC and Woodbridge will not, among
other things:
|
|
|
|
|
conduct its business in a manner that is not consistent with its
ordinary course of business and past practice or in a manner
that would cause it to default under certain material contracts
to which it is a party;
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
change or amend its Articles of Incorporation or By-laws (except
that BFC may amend its Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation and By-laws as described in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus);
|
|
|
|
divide, combine or reclassify any of its capital stock or
otherwise make any changes in its capital structure;
|
|
|
|
declare, pay or set aside for payment any dividend or other
distribution in respect of its capital stock, except as
consistent with past practice;
|
|
|
|
adopt a plan of complete or partial liquidation, dissolution,
merger, consolidation, restructuring, recapitalization or other
reorganization;
|
|
|
|
engage in any action that could reasonably be expected to cause
the merger to fail to qualify as a reorganization
under Section 368(a) of the Code;
|
|
|
|
take any action that would cause its representations and
warranties contained in the merger agreement to be untrue in any
material respect;
|
|
|
|
take any action that would reasonably be likely to materially
delay the merger; or
|
|
|
|
agree to take, or make any commitment to take, any of the
foregoing actions.
|
In addition, Woodbridge has agreed that, during the period from
the date of the merger agreement to the earlier of the
consummation of the merger and the termination of the merger
agreement, except as expressly contemplated by the merger
agreement or consented to in writing by BFC, Woodbridge will not:
|
|
|
|
|
issue, sell, or grant any shares of its capital stock (except
shares of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock to be
issued upon exercise of options which are outstanding on the
date of the merger agreement); or
|
|
|
|
issue, sell or grant any options, warrants, or rights to
purchase or subscribe to, or enter into any arrangement or
contract with respect to the issuance or sale of, any of its
capital stock or rights or obligations convertible into or
exchangeable for any such shares of capital stock, except in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practices.
|
BFC has also agreed that, during the period from the date of the
merger agreement to the earlier of the consummation of the
merger and the termination of the merger agreement, except as
expressly contemplated by the merger agreement or consented to
in writing by Woodbridge, BFC will not cause its directors
and officers liability insurance policy, and any excess
liability policy related thereto, to be canceled, terminated or
otherwise not be renewed or replaced with at least an equivalent
amount of coverage and on other terms no less favorable to BFC
and its officers and directors.
Other
Covenants and Agreements
The merger agreement contains other covenants and agreements
relating to the period of time between the date of the merger
agreement and the earlier of the consummation of the merger and
the termination of the merger agreement, whereby each of BFC and
Woodbridge has agreed to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
give prompt notice to the other party of (i) any event
known to such party which has or is reasonably likely to have a
material adverse effect on such party, (ii) any event or
circumstance that constitutes or could reasonably be expected to
constitute a breach of any of the representations, warranties,
or covenants of such party contained in the merger agreement or
(iii) any event or circumstance which could materially and
adversely affect such partys ability to satisfy the
conditions to the merger;
|
|
|
|
permit the other party and its authorized representatives
reasonable access during regular business hours to the
properties of such party and make their respective directors,
management and other employees and agents and authorized
representatives (including counsel and independent public
accountants) available to confer with the other party and its
authorized representatives at reasonable times and upon
reasonable request;
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
disclose and make available to the other party, and cause its
agents and authorized representatives to disclose and make
available to the other party, all books, papers and records
relating to the assets, properties, operations, obligations and
liabilities of such party, and to maintain the confidentiality
of such information, except as otherwise required by law;
|
|
|
|
consult with the other party before issuing, and provide the
other party the opportunity to review, comment upon and approve,
subject to applicable law, regulation or stock exchange rules,
any press release or other public announcement with respect to
the merger agreement or the merger;
|
|
|
|
use its reasonable efforts (i) in good faith to take or
cause to be taken as promptly as practicable all reasonable
actions within its control to cause the conditions precedent to
its obligations to consummate the merger to be fulfilled and
(ii) to obtain all consents and approvals required in
connection with the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
hold a meeting of its shareholders as promptly as reasonably
practicable after the effectiveness of the registration
statement of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus is a
part and use its reasonable efforts to secure the required vote
or consent of its shareholders;
|
|
|
|
provide the other party with the information pertaining to such
party required by the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, as the
case may be, for inclusion in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus and the registration statement of which
this joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part;
|
|
|
|
use all reasonable efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all
actions and to do, or cause to be done, all things necessary,
proper or advisable on the part of such party, to consummate and
make effective the transactions contemplated by the merger
agreement at the earliest practicable date, including obtaining
all required consents, approvals, waivers, exemptions,
amendments and authorizations, giving all notices, and making or
effecting all filings, registrations, applications, designations
and declarations;
|
|
|
|
use reasonable best efforts to cause the merger to qualify as a
reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code
and use reasonable best efforts not to, and not to permit or
cause any of its affiliates (or subsidiaries, in the case of
BFC) to, take any action or cause any action to be taken which
would cause the merger to fail to so qualify as a
reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code;
|
|
|
|
use its commercially reasonable efforts to cause to be delivered
to the other party reasonable and customary comfort letters from
its independent accountant; and
|
|
|
|
cooperate and consult with the other party, to the fullest
extent possible, in connection with any shareholder litigation
against it or any of its directors or officers with respect to
the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
|
In addition, between the date of the merger agreement and the
earlier of the consummation of the merger and the termination of
the merger agreement, BFC has agreed to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
prepare and file with the SEC, with Woodbridges
assistance, the registration statement of which this joint proxy
statement/prospectus is a part and use all commercially
reasonable efforts to cause the registration statement to become
effective as promptly as practicable after filing and to
maintain such effectiveness until all of the shares of
BFCs Class A Common Stock to be issued in connection
with the merger have been issued and distributed;
|
|
|
|
use its best efforts to cause the seven directors of Woodbridge
who are not also directors of BFC as well as Seth M. Wise and
Jarett S. Levan to be appointed to the board of directors of BFC
in connection with the merger;
|
|
|
|
use its best efforts to cause Seth M. Wise to be appointed
Executive Vice President of BFC in connection with the
merger; and
|
|
|
|
take any action required under applicable federal or state
securities laws in connection with the issuance of the shares of
BFCs Class A Common Stock in connection with the
merger.
|
95
Further, between the date of the merger agreement and the
earlier of the consummation of the merger and the termination of
the merger agreement, Woodbridge has agreed to, among other
things:
|
|
|
|
|
discontinue the sale or contribution (for any applicable period
not commenced as of the date of the merger agreement) of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock and Class B
Common Stock pursuant to any of Woodbridges employee
benefit plans which are subject to Section 401(a) of the
Code;
|
|
|
|
cause all outstanding options to purchase shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock to be canceled as of
the effective time of the merger; and
|
|
|
|
terminate its shareholder rights plan as of the effective time
of the merger and take such actions as may be necessary to cause
the shareholder rights plan to be inapplicable to the merger and
the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
|
No
Solicitation
The merger agreement provides that, from and after the date of
the merger agreement until the effective time of the merger,
without the prior written consent of the other company, and
subject to the rights described under Superior
Proposal below, neither BFC nor Woodbridge will, and
neither will permit its directors, officers, employees,
investment bankers, attorneys, accountants or other
representatives, agents or affiliates to, directly or indirectly:
|
|
|
|
|
solicit, initiate, or knowingly encourage any acquisition
proposal or any inquiries or proposals that could reasonably be
expected to lead to any acquisition proposal;
|
|
|
|
engage in negotiations or discussions concerning, or provide any
non-public information to any person in connection with, any
acquisition proposal or under circumstances that could
reasonably be expected to result in an acquisition
proposal; or
|
|
|
|
agree to, approve, recommend or otherwise endorse or support any
acquisition proposal.
|
As defined in the merger agreement, the term acquisition
proposal means, other than the merger or any proposal or
modification thereof, any proposal relating to a possible:
|
|
|
|
|
merger, consolidation, share exchange, business combination or
similar transaction involving Woodbridge or any of its
subsidiaries or BFC;
|
|
|
|
sale, lease, exchange, transfer or other disposition (other than
sales of inventory in the ordinary course of business consistent
with past practices), directly or indirectly, by merger,
consolidation, share exchange or otherwise (whether in one or
more transactions), of all or substantially all of the assets of
Woodbridge and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis or BFC;
|
|
|
|
liquidation, dissolution, recapitalization or other similar type
of transaction;
|
|
|
|
tender or exchange offer for ten percent or more of the
outstanding shares of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock and Class B Common Stock or BFCs Class A
Common Stock and Class B Common Stock or other transaction
with Woodbridge or BFC in which any person or group shall
acquire or have the right to acquire beneficial ownership of ten
percent or more of the outstanding shares of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock or
BFCs Class A Common Stock and Class B Common
Stock; or
|
|
|
|
other transaction which is similar in form, substance or purpose
to any of the foregoing transactions.
|
The merger agreement further provides that, with respect to an
acquisition proposal, Woodbridge or BFC, as the case may be,
will:
|
|
|
|
|
notify the other company immediately, and in any event within
24 hours, if (i) an acquisition proposal is made or is
modified in any respect (including any written material provided
by the offeror, the principal terms and conditions of any such
acquisition proposal or modification thereto and the identity of
the offeror), in which case Woodbridge or BFC will provide a
copy of the acquisition proposal
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
concurrently with such notice or (ii) if either of them
furnishes non-public information to, or enters into discussions
or negotiations with respect to an acquisition proposal with,
any third party;
|
|
|
|
|
|
as promptly as practicable, advise the other company orally and
in writing of any request for information that could reasonably
be expected to lead to an acquisition proposal as well as the
material terms and conditions of such request or inquiry and
keep the other company informed in all respects of the status of
any such request or inquiry; and
|
|
|
|
provide the other company with prior telephonic (promptly
confirmed in writing) or written notice of any board of
directors or committee meeting at which an acquisition proposal
is expected or could reasonably be expected to be considered,
together with a copy of the documentation relating to such
acquisition proposal to the extent such documentation is then
available (and otherwise provide such documentation as soon as
available).
|
Superior
Proposal
The merger agreement provides further that, notwithstanding the
restrictions described above, if at any time prior to the
effective time of the merger, any third party submits to
BFCs board of directors or Woodbridges special
committee or board of directors an unsolicited, bona fide,
written acquisition proposal not resulting from a breach of the
no solicitation provisions of the merger agreement,
and BFCs board of directors or Woodbridges special
committee or board of directors, as the case may be, reasonably
determines in good faith, (i) after consultation with their
financial, legal and other advisors, that such acquisition
proposal will result in, or upon further discussion with or due
diligence by such person could reasonably be expected to
constitute or result in, a superior proposal and (ii) after
consultation with their outside legal counsel, that the failure
to take the following actions may be inconsistent with their
fiduciary duties under applicable law, then BFC or Woodbridge,
as the case may be, may:
|
|
|
|
|
furnish information about its business to such person under
protection of an appropriate confidentiality agreement
containing customary limitations on the use and disclosure of
all non-public written or oral information furnished to such
person, provided that Woodbridge contemporaneously furnishes to
BFC or BFC contemporaneously furnishes to Woodbridge, as the
case may be, all the non-public information furnished to such
person; and
|
|
|
|
negotiate and participate in discussions with such person.
|
The merger agreement provides that the term superior
proposal means any unsolicited, bona fide, written
acquisition proposal for consideration consisting of cash (not
subject to a financing contingency)
and/or
securities, and otherwise on terms which BFCs board of
directors or Woodbridges special committee or board of
directors, as the case may be, determines, after consultation
with their legal, financial and other advisors, are more
favorable to the respective companys shareholders from a
financial point of view than the merger, taking into account the
ability of the offeror to consummate the superior proposal on
substantially the terms proposed.
Nothing contained in the merger agreement will prohibit BFC or
Woodbridge from taking, and disclosing to its shareholders, a
position required by
Rule 14d-9
or
Rule 14e-2(a)
of the Exchange Act or Item 1012(a) of
Regulation M-A
promulgated thereunder.
Change of
Recommendation
The merger agreement provides that the board of directors of
Woodbridge and BFC may withhold, withdraw, modify or change its
approval or recommendation of the merger agreement and the
merger and the related transactions, respectively, or approve or
recommend to the applicable companys shareholders a
superior proposal if, after the date of the merger agreement and
prior to the effective time of the merger, the company receives
a superior proposal not in violation of the no
solicitation provisions of the merger agreement and
BFCs board of directors or Woodbridges special
committee or board of directors, as the case may be, determines,
in good faith and after consultation with their financial
advisors and legal counsel, that the failure to do so would be
inconsistent with their fiduciary duties under applicable law.
In the case of such
97
an event, Woodbridge or BFC, as the case may be, must provide
the other company with at least two business days prior written
notice stating that its intention to take such actions and such
notice must include the principal terms and conditions of any
such superior proposal and the identity of the offeror.
Termination
of the Merger Agreement
The merger agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the
effective time of the merger by the mutual written consent of
Woodbridge and BFC. In addition, the merger agreement may be
terminated by Woodbridge or BFC in certain circumstances,
including if:
|
|
|
|
|
the merger has not been consummated by September 15, 2009
or, provided the companies are proceeding in good faith to
consummate the merger, December 15, 2009;
|
|
|
|
the shareholders of BFC do not approve the merger and the
related transactions or the shareholders of Woodbridge do not
approve the merger agreement;
|
|
|
|
any order, decree, ruling or other judgment issued by any court
or other governmental entity prohibiting the consummation of the
merger is in effect and has become final and nonappealable;
|
|
|
|
any law is enacted which makes consummation of the merger
illegal; or
|
|
|
|
BFCs board of directors or Woodbridges special
committee or board of directors determines to approve or
recommend a superior proposal after complying with the no
solicitation provisions of the merger agreement or
withholds or withdraws its recommendation of the merger
agreement or the merger in a manner adverse to the other company.
|
The merger agreement also may be terminated by Woodbridge if:
|
|
|
|
|
BFC breaches or fails to perform in any material respect any of
its representations, warranties, covenants or other agreements
contained in the merger agreement, which breach is incapable of
being cured or is not cured within 15 days following the
giving of written notice to BFC and which breach or failure to
perform would result in the failure of a condition to
Woodbridges obligation to consummate the merger; or
|
|
|
|
Ewing, Woodbridges financial advisor, withdraws, revokes,
annuls or materially modifies its fairness opinion.
|
The merger agreement also may be terminated by BFC if:
|
|
|
|
|
Woodbridge breaches or fails to perform in any material respect
any of its representations, warranties, covenants or other
agreements contained in the merger agreement, which breach is
incapable of being cured or is not cured within 15 days
following the giving of written notice to Woodbridge and which
breach or failure to perform would result in the failure of a
condition to BFCs obligation to consummate the merger;
|
|
|
|
JMP Securities, BFCs financial advisor, withdraws,
revokes, annuls or materially modifies its fairness
opinion; or
|
|
|
|
a tender offer or exchange offer for ten percent or more of the
outstanding shares of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock and Class B Common Stock is commenced or a
registration statement or statement on Schedule TO with
respect thereto is filed (other than by BFC or certain of its
affiliates) and the board of directors of Woodbridge,
notwithstanding its obligations under the merger agreement,
recommends that the shareholders of Woodbridge tender their
shares in such tender or exchange offer or publicly announces
its intention to take no position with respect to such tender
offer.
|
Neither BFC nor Woodbridge is required to pay a fee to the other
company in the event the merger agreement is terminated. In
addition, neither company will be subject to any liability in
the event the merger agreement is terminated, except in the case
of a termination relating to a breach by that company of the
provisions of the merger agreement.
98
Expenses
All fees and expenses incurred in connection with the merger
will be paid by the party incurring such fees or expenses,
except that BFC and Woodbridge have each agreed to share equally
all expenses incurred in connection with the printing, mailing
and filing with the SEC of this joint proxy statement/prospectus
and the registration statement of which this joint proxy
statement/prospectus is a part.
Indemnification
and Insurance
The merger agreement provides that the Surviving Company will
indemnify, defend and hold harmless each present and former
director and officer of Woodbridge for each such directors
and officers liabilities with respect to acts or omissions
occurring prior to the effective time of the merger, to the same
extent as provided for under the FBCA and in Woodbridges
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation or By-laws.
The merger agreement also provides that for six years after the
effective time of the merger, the Surviving Company will
maintain or cause to be maintained in effect the current
policies of directors and officers liability
insurance maintained by Woodbridge or a substitute policy of at
least the same coverage and amount as, and containing terms and
conditions which are substantially no less advantageous than,
the Woodbridge policy, in each case, with respect to claims
arising from facts or events which occurred before the effective
time of the merger. Alternatively, the Surviving Company may
obtain single limit tail directors and officers
liability insurance coverage providing at least the same
coverage and amount as, and containing terms and conditions
which are substantially no less advantageous than, the
Woodbridge policy for such six-year period with respect to
claims arising from facts or events which occurred before the
effective time of the merger, in which event and upon the
request of BFC, Woodbridge shall purchase such coverage
immediately prior to the consummation of the merger.
Amendment
and Waiver
The merger agreement may be amended or modified, in whole or in
part, at any time only by a writing signed by BFC and
Woodbridge. However, except as may be required by applicable
law, prior to the effective time of the merger, any consent,
waiver or other determination to be made, or action to be taken,
by Woodbridge under the merger agreement will be made or taken
only upon the approval of the Woodbridge special committee.
99
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
statements present the pro forma combined financial position and
results of operations of BFC, with Woodbridge as its
wholly-owned subsidiary, based upon the historical financial
statements of BFC and Woodbridge, after giving effect to the
merger and adjustments described in the accompanying footnotes,
and are intended to reflect the impact of the merger on BFC. The
unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements are
based upon and have been developed from the historical
consolidated financial statements of BFC and Woodbridge
contained elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements
are prepared reflecting the merger as an equity transaction and
as if the merger had been consummated on June 30, 2009 for
purposes of the unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance
sheet as of such date, and on January 1, 2008 for purposes
of the unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the six
months ended June 30, 2009.
The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
statements are provided for illustrative purposes only and do
not purport to represent what the actual consolidated results of
operations or the actual consolidated financial position of BFC
would have been had the merger occurred on the dates assumed,
nor should they be relied on as being indicative of the future
consolidated results of operations or the future consolidated
financial position of BFC following the merger. The unaudited
pro forma condensed combined financial statements should be read
in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and
accompanying notes of BFC and Woodbridge that are included
elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
100
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
AS OF JUNE 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BFC
|
|
|
Proforma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for share data)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
271,873
|
|
|
|
(745
|
)(2)
|
|
|
271,128
|
|
Securities investment
|
|
|
690,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
690,596
|
|
Loans receivable and residential loans held for sale
|
|
|
4,028,761
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,028,761
|
|
Real estate held for development and sale
|
|
|
270,958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270,958
|
|
Real estate owned
|
|
|
34,317
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,317
|
|
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
40,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,583
|
|
Properties and equipment, net
|
|
|
304,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304,291
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets
|
|
|
35,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,363
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
136,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
5,812,997
|
|
|
|
(745
|
)
|
|
|
5,812,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
4,055,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,055,047
|
|
Advances from FHLB
|
|
|
597,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
597,252
|
|
Short term borrowings
|
|
|
25,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,068
|
|
Subordinated debentures, mortgage notes payable
|
|
|
286,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
286,245
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
383,325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
383,325
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
129,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
5,476,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,476,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock of $.01 par value; authorized -
10,000,000 shares; Redeemable 5% Cumulative Preferred
Stock $.01 par value; authorized
15,000 shares; issued and outstanding 15,000 shares in
2009 with a redemption value of $1,000 per share
|
|
|
11,029
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
11,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock of $.01 par value, authorized
100,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 38,275,112 in
2009, proforma 83,044,150
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
448
|
(1)
|
|
|
830
|
|
Class B common stock of $.01 par value, authorized
20,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 6,854,381 in 2009
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
124,728
|
|
|
|
108,342
|
(1)
|
|
|
233,070
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(32,050
|
)
|
|
|
(745
|
)(2)
|
|
|
(32,795
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
3,398
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total BFC shareholders equity
|
|
|
96,527
|
|
|
|
108,045
|
|
|
|
204,572
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
229,424
|
|
|
|
(108,790
|
)(1)
|
|
|
120,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
325,951
|
|
|
|
(745
|
)
|
|
|
325,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
5,812,997
|
|
|
|
(745
|
)
|
|
|
5,812,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently, BFCs voting
interest in Woodbridge is 58.9% and, accordingly, BFC is
required under generally accepted accounting principles to
consolidate the financial results of Woodbridge. As such, the
merger will be accounted for as an equity transaction.
Therefore, both the fair value of the consideration paid and the
excess carrying value of the noncontrolling interest are
recorded in equity.
|
(1)
|
|
The consideration that BFC will
receive in exchange for the shares of its Class A Common
Stock that it will issue in the merger is based on the carrying
value of BFCs non-controlling interest in Woodbridge at
March 31, 2009 of $103.5 million and was allocated
between common stock and additional paid-in capital. The excess
carrying value of non-controlling interest of approximately
$5.3 million was recorded in additional paid-in capital.
The exchange ratio of 3.47 shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock for each share of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock was determined by dividing the
carrying value per share of Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock of $8.02 as of March 31, 2009 by the carrying
value per share of BFCs Class A Common Stock of $2.31 as
of that same date.
|
(2)
|
|
Estimated direct costs associated
with the merger.
|
101
UNAUDITED
PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
BFC
|
|
|
Proforma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for per share data)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BFC Activities
|
|
$
|
952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
952
|
|
Financial Services
|
|
|
184,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184,564
|
|
Real Estate Development
|
|
|
9,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
195,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BFC Activities
|
|
|
5,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,751
|
|
Financial Services
|
|
|
268,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268,493
|
|
Real Estate Development
|
|
|
28,798
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,798
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
303,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
17,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,250
|
|
Impairment of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(20,401
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,401
|
)
|
Impairment of other investments
|
|
|
(2,396
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,396
|
)
|
Gain on settlement of investment in Woodbridges subsidiary
|
|
|
40,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(72,759
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72,759
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(72,759
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72,759
|
)
|
Less: Net loss from continuing operations attributable to
noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
48,189
|
|
|
|
11,814
|
(1)
|
|
|
60,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income from continuing operations attributable to BFC
|
|
$
|
(24,570
|
)
|
|
|
11,814
|
|
|
|
(12,756
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted loss per common share from continuing
operations
|
|
$
|
(0.55
|
)(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)(3)
|
Diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
45,120
|
|
|
|
44,769
|
(2)
|
|
|
89,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
BFC
|
|
|
Proforma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for per share data)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BFC Activities
|
|
$
|
4,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,408
|
|
Financial Services
|
|
|
449,571
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
449,571
|
|
Real Estate Development
|
|
|
33,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
487,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
487,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BFC Activities
|
|
|
12,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,139
|
|
Financial Services
|
|
|
634,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
634,970
|
|
Real Estate Development
|
|
|
72,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
719,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
719,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
15,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,064
|
|
Impairment of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(96,579
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96,579
|
)
|
Impairment of investments
|
|
|
(15,548
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,548
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes and
noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(329,453
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(329,453
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
15,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(345,216
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(345,216
|
)
|
Net loss from continuing operations attributable to
noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
272,711
|
|
|
|
(111,307
|
)(1)
|
|
|
161,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from continuing operations attributable to BFC
|
|
$
|
(72,505
|
)
|
|
|
(111,307
|
)
|
|
|
(183,812
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted loss per common share from continuing
operations
|
|
$
|
(1.62
|
)(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2.05
|
)(3)
|
Diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
45,097
|
|
|
|
44,769
|
(2)
|
|
|
89,866
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Eliminate net (loss) income from
continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interest in
Woodbridge.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Shares of BFCs Class A
Common Stock that will be issued to Woodbridges
shareholders in the merger.
|
|
(3)
|
|
For purposes of computing basic and
diluted loss per common share from continuing operations,
preferred stock dividends of $375,000 and $750,000 were included
in the numerators for the six months ended June 30, 2009
and for the year ended December 31, 2008, respectively.
|
102
MATERIAL
CONTRACTS BETWEEN BFC AND WOODBRIDGE
2007 Merger Agreement. On January 30,
2007, BFC and Woodbridge (then Levitt Corporation) entered into
a definitive agreement pursuant to which Woodbridge was to merge
with and into and become a wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC and
holders of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock (other
than BFC) were to receive 2.27 shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock for each share of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock that they held (subject to adjustment
in accordance with the terms of the agreement). By letter to
Woodbridge dated August 14, 2007, BFC terminated the
agreement based on its conclusion that, based on then-current
circumstances, the conditions to closing the proposed merger
could not be met. As a result, the proposed merger was not
consummated.
Agreement Regarding BFCs Right to Vote Certain Shares
of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock. By letter agreement dated
September 27, 2007, BFC agreed, subject to certain limited
exceptions, not to vote the 1,229,117 shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock that it acquired
upon exercise of subscription rights distributed to it in
Woodbridges 2007 rights offering based on its ownership of
Woodbridges Class B Common Stock. The agreement was
entered into in connection with the listing of the shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock issued in the rights
offering on the New York Stock Exchange. As a result of the
delisting of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock from
the New York Stock Exchange during November 2008, BFC and
Woodbridge mutually agreed to terminate the letter agreement
and, accordingly, BFC is free to vote the 1,229,117 shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock that were previously
subject to the New York Stock Exchange restriction.
Other Relationships. For a description of
certain other arrangements and relationships between BFC and
Woodbridge, see the sections of this prospectus captioned
Information About BFC Certain Relationships
and Related Transactions and Information About
Woodbridge Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions.
103
COMPARATIVE
STOCK PRICES AND DIVIDENDS
BFCs Class A Common Stock is currently listed for
trading on the Pink Sheets under the trading symbol
BFCF.PK. Prior to December 9, 2008, BFCs
Class A Common Stock traded on the NYSE Arca, Inc. under
the trading symbol BFF. Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock is currently listed for trading on the
Pink Sheets under the trading symbol WDGH.PK. From
May 27, 2008 through November 20, 2008,
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock traded on the New
York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol WDG
and, prior to that time, it traded on the New York Stock
Exchange under the trading symbol LEV. On
September 26, 2008, Woodbridge effected a
one-for-five
reverse stock split, pursuant to which each five shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock outstanding at that
time automatically converted into one share of Class A
Common Stock, and each five shares of Woodbridges
Class B Common Stock outstanding at that time converted
into one share of Class B Common Stock.
The tables below set forth, for the periods indicated, dividends
declared and the high and low per share sales prices for
BFCs Class A Common Stock as reported on the NYSE
Arca, Inc., with respect to the time period prior to
December 9, 2008, and as reported on the Pink Sheets, with
respect to the time period on and after such date, and for
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock as reported on the
New York Stock Exchange, with respect to the time period prior
to November 20, 2008, and as reported on the Pink Sheets,
with respect to the time period on and after such date. The
information relating to Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock has been adjusted to reflect the
one-for-five
reverse stock split described above.
BFCs
Class A Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
per Share
|
|
Calendar Year 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
6.75
|
|
|
$
|
4.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
4.50
|
|
|
|
3.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
4.04
|
|
|
|
2.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
3.38
|
|
|
|
1.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar Year 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
1.56
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
1.26
|
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
1.04
|
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
0.68
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar Year 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
0.51
|
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third quarter (through August 12, 2009)
|
|
|
0.51
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
per Share
|
|
Calendar Year 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
77.20
|
|
|
$
|
45.95
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
59.10
|
|
|
|
42.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
53.10
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
20.00
|
|
|
|
7.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar Year 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
13.15
|
|
|
$
|
7.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
11.50
|
|
|
|
5.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
6.60
|
|
|
|
0.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
3.25
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar Year 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
0.89
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
2.56
|
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third quarter (through August 12, 2009)
|
|
|
1.65
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
104
The preceding tables show only historical comparisons. Because
the market prices of BFCs Class A Common Stock and
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock likely will
fluctuate prior to the merger, these comparisons may not provide
meaningful information to BFCs or Woodbridges
shareholders in determining how to vote at their respective
meetings. Shareholders are encouraged to obtain current market
quotations for BFCs Class A Common Stock and
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock and to review
carefully the other information contained in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
While there are no restrictions on the payment of cash dividends
by BFC, other than those restrictions contained in the merger
agreement with respect to the interim period between the date of
the merger agreement and the effective time of the merger, BFC
has never paid cash dividends on its common stock. While BFC may
consider declaring and paying dividends in the future with
respect to its Class A Common Stock, there can be no
assurance that it will do so. Future declaration and payment of
cash dividends with respect to BFCs Class A Common
Stock, if any, will be determined in light of the then-current
financial condition of BFC and other factors deemed relevant by
the board of directors of BFC.
Woodbridges board of directors has not adopted a policy of
regular dividend payments. On January 22, 2007,
Woodbridges board of directors declared a cash dividend of
$0.10 per share on its Class A Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock, and this dividend was paid in
February 2007. Since that time, Woodbridge has not declared or
paid dividends on its Class A Common Stock or Class B
Common Stock. The payment of dividends in the future is subject
to approval by Woodbridges board of directors and will
depend upon, among other factors, Woodbridges results of
operations and financial condition. Woodbridge does not expect
to pay dividends to its shareholders for the foreseeable future.
After completion of the merger, only BFC, as the parent company
of Woodbridge, will be entitled to receive dividends or
distributions from Woodbridge, and the former shareholders of
Woodbridge will not be entitled to receive dividends from
Woodbridge.
The following table sets forth the closing prices for BFCs
Class A Common Stock and Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock as reported on the Pink Sheets on July 2,
2009, the last trading day before BFC and Woodbridge announced
the merger agreement, and on August 14, 2009, the last
trading day before the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. The table also includes the equivalent
prices per share of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock
that holders of such stock would receive in connection with the
merger if the merger were completed on either of these dates,
applying the exchange ratio of 3.47 shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock for each share of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equivalent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
BFCs
|
|
Woodbridges
|
|
Woodbridges
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
Class A
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
July 2, 2009
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
|
$
|
1.39
|
|
August 14, 2009
|
|
$
|
0.49
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
$
|
1.70
|
|
105
COMPARISON
OF RIGHTS OF COMMON SHAREHOLDERS OF BFC AND WOODBRIDGE
BFC and Woodbridge are Florida corporations subject to the
provisions of Florida law. Woodbridges shareholders, whose
rights are currently governed by Woodbridges Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation and By-laws, will, if the
merger is completed, become holders of BFCs Class A
Common Stock and their rights will be governed by BFCs
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation and By-laws.
The following description summarizes the material differences
that may affect the rights of shareholders of BFC and Woodbridge
but does not purport to be a complete statement of all those
differences or a complete description of the specific provisions
referred to in this summary and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the FBCA and the governing corporate instruments of
BFC and Woodbridge, to each of which you are referred. The
identification of specific differences is not intended to
indicate that other equally or more significant differences do
not exist. Woodbridges shareholders should read carefully
the relevant provisions of Florida law, BFCs Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation (and each amendment thereto,
including the form of amendment to BFCs Articles of
Incorporation which is attached hereto as Annex D) and
the By-laws of BFC attached hereto as Annex E (which
reflect the amendments to such By-laws to be adopted in
connection with the merger), as well as Woodbridges
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation and By-laws. See
Where You Can Find More Information.
Authorized
Capital Stock
BFC. The authorized capital stock of BFC
consists of 130,000,000 shares of capital stock, consisting
of (i) 100,000,000 shares of Class A Common
Stock, par value $0.01 per share,
(ii) 20,000,000 shares of Class B Common Stock,
par value $0.01 per share, and (iii) 10,000,000 shares
of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share. In connection
with the merger, the number of authorized shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock under BFCs Articles of
Incorporation will be increased from 100,000,000 to 150,000,000,
thereby increasing the total number of shares of authorized
capital stock of BFC from 130,000,000 to 180,000,000.
Woodbridge. The authorized capital stock of
Woodbridge consists of 37,000,000 shares of capital stock,
consisting of (i) 30,000,000 shares of Class A
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share,
(ii) 2,000,000 shares of Class B Common Stock,
par value $0.01 per share, and (iii) 5,000,000 shares
of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share.
Voting
Rights
BFC. Each share of BFCs Class A
Common Stock is entitled to one vote, and all shares of
BFCs Class A Common Stock represent in the aggregate
22% of the total voting power of BFC. Each share of BFCs
Class B Common Stock is entitled to the number of votes per
share which will represent in the aggregate 78% of the total
voting power of BFC. These fixed voting percentages will remain
in effect until the total number of outstanding shares of
BFCs Class B Common Stock falls below 1,800,000. If
the total number of outstanding shares of BFCs
Class B Common Stock is less than 1,800,000 but greater
than 1,400,000, then BFCs Class A Common Stock will
hold a voting percentage equal to 40% of BFCs total voting
power and BFCs Class B Common Stock will hold a
voting percentage equal to the remaining 60% of BFCs total
voting power. If the total number of outstanding shares of
BFCs Class B Common Stock is less than 1,400,000 but
greater than 500,000, then BFCs Class A Common Stock
will hold a voting percentage equal to 53% of BFCs total
voting power and BFCs Class B Common Stock will hold
a voting percentage equal to the remaining 47% of BFCs
total voting power. If the total number of outstanding shares of
BFCs Class B Common Stock is less than 500,000, then
each share of BFCs Class A Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock will be entitled to one vote.
Woodbridge. Each share of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock is entitled to one vote, and all
shares of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock represent
in the aggregate 53% of the total voting power of Woodbridge.
Each share of Woodbridges Class B Common Stock is
entitled to the number of votes per share which will represent
in the aggregate 47% of the total voting power of Woodbridge.
The fixed voting percentages will be eliminated, and shares of
Woodbridges Class B Common Stock will be entitled to
only
106
Shares of
Preferred Stock Outstanding
BFC. BFCs Amended and Restated Articles
of Incorporation provide that the board of directors of BFC has
the power to authorize the issuance of preferred shares and to
fix the designation, powers, preferences, rights,
qualifications, limitations and restrictions thereof. Currently,
there are 15,000 shares outstanding of 5% Cumulative
Preferred Stock of BFC.
Woodbridge. Woodbridges Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation provide that the board of
directors of Woodbridge has the power to authorize the issuance
of preferred shares and to fix the designations, voting powers,
preferences, rights, qualifications, limitations and
restrictions thereof. Currently, there are no outstanding shares
of preferred stock of Woodbridge.
Ownership
Restrictions on Common Stock
BFC. There are limitations on the amount of
shares of BFCs common stock that an individual or company
can own without obtaining regulatory approval. As a unitary
savings bank holding company, BFC is subject to regulation by
the OTS. Among other things, ownership of control of
BFC is subject to applicable OTS regulations. Under the
applicable regulations of the OTS, if a shareholder, directly or
indirectly, or through one or more subsidiaries, or acting in
concert with one or more other persons or entities, owns
(i) more than 10% of BFCs common stock and one or
more specified control factors exist, then the shareholder will
be determined, subject to the right of rebuttal, to have
acquired control of BFC or (ii) more than 25% of BFCs
common stock, then the shareholder will be conclusively
determined to have acquired control of BFC, regardless of
whether any control factors exist. Accordingly, subject to
certain limited exceptions, any Woodbridge shareholder who
receives shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock in the
merger which causes its ownership of BFCs common stock to
exceed the thresholds set forth above will be required to file
an application, notice or rebuttal with the OTS. Pending
favorable action by the OTS on such application, notice or
rebuttal, the shareholders actions with respect to BFC
will be limited as set forth in the applicable regulation. If
the OTS disapproves of the application, notice or rebuttal, then
the shareholder will be required to divest such portion of its
shares of BFCs common stock necessary to cause its
ownership to fall below the applicable regulatory threshold.
Woodbridges shareholders should consult with their legal
counsel regarding any regulatory limitations on their ownership
of BFCs common stock that may be applicable to them,
including whether they are required to submit an application,
notice or rebuttal to the OTS relating to their share ownership.
Woodbridge. There currently are no regulatory
or other limitations regarding the number of shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock that a shareholder
may own. However, only BFC and its affiliates may hold
Woodbridges Class B Common Stock and, accordingly,
sales of Woodbridges Class B Common Stock to
unaffiliated parties would require the conversion of those
shares to Woodbridges Class A Common Stock prior to
or contemporaneously with the sale. The sale of BFC or any other
change in control of BFC would not result in the conversion of
the shares of Woodbridges Class B Common Stock held
by BFC into shares of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock.
Conversion
Rights of Class B Common Stock
BFC. Subject to certain limited exceptions
with respect to the shares of BFCs Class B Common
Stock held by John E. Abdo, BFCs Vice Chairman, shares of
BFCs Class B Common Stock are convertible on a
share-for-share
basis into shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock at any
time in the holders discretion.
Woodbridge. Shares of Woodbridges
Class B Common Stock are convertible on a
share-for-share
basis into shares of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock
at any time in BFCs discretion.
107
Dividends
and Other Distributions; Liquidation Rights
BFC. No dividend or other distribution (other
than a dividend or distribution payable solely in common stock)
shall be paid on or set apart for payment on BFCs
Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock until
such time as all accrued and unpaid dividends on the 5%
Cumulative Preferred Stock of BFC have been or contemporaneously
are declared or paid and a sum is set apart sufficient for
payment of such accrued and unpaid dividends. Subject to the
foregoing, holders of BFCs Class A Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock are entitled to receive cash
dividends, when and as declared by the board of directors of BFC
out of legally available assets. Any distribution per share with
respect to BFCs Class A Common Stock will be
identical to the distribution per share with respect to
BFCs Class B Common Stock, except that a stock
dividend or other non-cash distribution to holders of BFCs
Class A Common Stock may be declared and issued only in the
form of BFCs Class A Common Stock while a dividend or
other non-cash distribution to holders of BFCs
Class B Common Stock may be declared and issued in the form
of either BFCs Class A Common Stock or Class B
Common Stock at the discretion of the board of directors of BFC,
provided that the number of any shares so issued or any non-cash
distribution is the same on a per share basis.
Upon any liquidation of BFC, the assets legally available for
distribution to shareholders will be distributed ratably among
the holders of BFCs Class A Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock after payment of the liquidation
preference to which the holders of shares of 5% Cumulative
Preferred Stock of BFC are entitled.
Woodbridge. Holders of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock are
entitled to receive cash dividends, when and as declared by the
board of directors of Woodbridge out of legally available
assets. Any distribution per share with respect to
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock will be identical to
the distribution per share with respect to Woodbridges
Class B Common Stock, except that a stock dividend or other
non-cash distribution to holders of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock may be declared and issued only in the
form of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock while a
dividend or other non-cash distribution to holders of
Woodbridges Class B Common Stock may be declared and
issued in the form of either Woodbridges Class A
Common Stock or Class B Common Stock at the discretion of
the board of directors of Woodbridge, provided that the number
of any shares so issued or any non-cash distribution is the same
on a per share basis.
Upon any liquidation of Woodbridge, the assets legally available
for distribution to shareholders will be distributed ratably
among the holders of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock
and Class B Common Stock.
Number
and Classification of Board of Directors
BFC. BFCs By-laws currently provide for
a board of directors comprised of between three and twelve
members, as determined by the board of directors, and for the
board to be divided into three classes, as nearly equal in
number as possible, with the term of office of one class
expiring each year. As of the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, the board of directors of BFC consists of
five members. As described elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, BFCs board of directors has approved
an amendment to BFCs By-laws which, effective upon
consummation of the merger, will provide for a board of
directors comprised of between three and fifteen members, as
determined by the board of directors. The seven directors of
Woodbridge who do not currently serve as directors of BFC as
well as Seth M. Wise and Jarett S. Levan are to be appointed to
the board of directors of BFC, resulting in a board of fourteen
members. See The Merger Board of Directors and
Executive Officers of BFC Following the Merger. BFCs
board of directors has also approved an amendment to BFCs
By-laws which, effective upon consummation of the merger, will
provide that each director elected or appointed to BFCs
board of directors on or after the effective date of the merger
will serve for a term expiring at BFCs next annual meeting
of shareholders. As a result of this amendment (and subject to
any future amendments), following BFCs 2012 annual meeting
of shareholders, BFCs board of directors will no longer be
divided into multiple classes serving staggered terms.
Woodbridge. Woodbridges By-laws provide
for a board of directors comprised of between three and twelve
members, as determined by the board of directors. As of the date
of this joint proxy statement/
108
prospectus, the board of directors of Woodbridge consists of
nine members and is divided into three classes with the term of
office of one class expiring each year.
Newly
Created Directorships and Vacancies
BFC. BFCs By-laws provide that any
vacancy occurring in the board of directors of BFC, including
any vacancy created by reason of an increase in the number of
directors, may be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority
of the remaining directors although less than a quorum of the
board of directors. A director elected or appointed to fill a
vacancy caused by the resignation or removal of a director will
hold office for the same term as to which such directors
predecessor was elected or appointed. BFCs By-laws also
currently provide that, in the case of a director elected or
appointed to fill a vacancy created by reason of an increase in
the number of directors, the director will serve for the term
designated by the board of directors, but in no event will such
term exceed three years. However, as a result of the amendment
to eliminate BFCs staggered board, as described above, any
director elected or appointed on or after the effective date of
the merger to fill a vacancy created by reason of an increase in
the number of directors will serve for a term expiring at
BFCs next annual meeting of shareholders.
Woodbridge. Woodbridges By-laws provide
that any vacancy occurring in the board of directors may be
filled only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the
remaining directors although less than a quorum of the board of
directors, or by a sole remaining director. A director elected
or appointed to fill a vacancy will serve until the next
election of directors by Woodbridges shareholders.
Removal
of Directors
BFC. BFCs By-laws provide that any
director or the entire board of directors of BFC may be removed,
with or without cause, at a meeting of BFCs shareholders
called expressly for such purpose, by vote of the holders of a
majority of the shares entitled to vote on such removal.
Woodbridge. Under Florida law,
Woodbridges shareholders may remove one or more directors,
with or without cause, at a meeting of Woodbridges
shareholders, provided the notice of the meeting states that the
purpose, or one of the purposes, of the meeting is the removal
of such director or directors. The director or directors will be
removed by Woodbridges shareholders at the meeting called
for such purpose if the votes cast favoring removal exceed the
votes cast against removal.
Special
Meetings of Shareholders
BFC. BFCs By-laws provide that special
meetings of BFCs shareholders may be held when directed by
the president or the board of directors or when requested in
writing by the holders of not less than ten percent of all the
shares entitled to vote at the meeting. A special meeting
requested by shareholders will be called for a date not less
than 10 nor more than 60 days after the request is made,
unless (in the case of the
60-day
maximum) the shareholders requesting the meeting designate a
later date and unless (in the case of the
10-day
minimum) the number of shareholders constituting a quorum waive
the 10-day
minimum notice period. The call for the meeting will be issued
by the secretary, unless the president, board of directors or
shareholders requesting the meeting designate another person to
do so.
Woodbridge. Woodbridges By-laws provide
that special meetings of Woodbridges shareholders for any
purpose or purposes may be held when called by the chairman of
the board, the president, or a majority of the board of
directors or upon the written request of the holders of
outstanding shares representing not less than fifty percent of
the votes entitled to be cast at the meeting. Such written
request shall state the purpose of the meeting and shall be
delivered at the principal office of Woodbridge addressed to the
chairman of the board of directors, the president or the
secretary. No business other than that stated in the notice of a
special meeting will be transacted at such meeting. Written
notice stating the place, day and hour of the meeting and the
purpose or purposes for which the meeting is called shall be
delivered not less than 10 nor more than 60 days before the
date of the meeting, either personally or by mail, by or at the
direction of the chairman of the board, the president, the
secretary or the directors calling the meeting, to each
shareholder of record entitled to vote at such meeting.
109
Amendment
of Articles of Incorporation
BFC. The amendment of BFCs Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation is governed generally by
Florida law, which, subject to certain limited exceptions,
requires the amendment to be approved by the holders of shares
representing a majority of the votes entitled to be cast
thereon. In addition to the requirements under Florida law,
BFCs Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation
require the affirmative vote of the holders of at least
two-thirds of BFCs stock entitled to vote to amend such
articles; provided, however, that if an amendment is recommended
to BFCs shareholders by at least two-thirds of the members
of the board of directors of BFC, then such amendment will be
approved upon the affirmative vote of a simple majority of
BFCs stock entitled to vote on the amendment.
Woodbridge. The amendment of Woodbridges
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation is governed
solely by Florida law.
Corporate
Transactions
BFC. BFCs Amended and Restated Articles
of Incorporation requires that any merger, consolidation or
other acquisition and any sale, lease or transfer of all or
substantially all of the assets of BFC be approved by the
affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of
BFCs stock entitled to vote on the transaction; provided,
however, that if any such transaction is recommended to
BFCs shareholders by at least two-thirds of the members of
BFCs board of directors, then the transaction will be
approved upon the affirmative vote of a simple majority of
BFCs stock entitled to vote on the transaction.
Woodbridge. Woodbridges Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation do not have a similar
provision to the provision described above for BFC. As a result,
the shareholder vote, if any, required to approve any merger,
consolidation or other acquisition and any sale, lease or
transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of Woodbridge
is governed by Florida law. Subject to certain exceptions,
Florida law generally requires that the shareholders of a
company being acquired through a merger, consolidation or other
transaction, or selling all or substantially all of its assets,
approve such transaction or sale, and such shareholder approval
generally requires the affirmative vote of the holders of shares
representing a majority of the votes entitled to be cast on the
transaction or sale.
110
INFORMATION
ABOUT BFC
Certain of the information contained within this
Information About BFC section has been derived or
excerpted from BFCs Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the SEC on
March 31, 2009, Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, filed with the SEC on
August 11, 2009, and Definitive Proxy Statement on
Schedule 14A, filed with the SEC on April 29, 2009.
Unless stated to the contrary or the context otherwise requires,
references to we, us, our,
the Company and BFC within this
Information About BFC section refer to BFC Financial
Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.
BUSINESS
Overview
BFC is a diversified holding company whose major holdings
include controlling interests in BankAtlantic Bancorp and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries and Woodbridge and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries and a noncontrolling interest in Benihana, which
operates Asian-themed restaurant chains in the United States. As
a result of the Companys position as the controlling
shareholder of BankAtlantic Bancorp, BFC is a unitary
savings bank holding company regulated by the OTS.
Historically, BFCs business strategy has been to invest in
and acquire businesses in diverse industries either directly or
through controlled subsidiaries. BFC believes that the best
potential for growth is likely through the growth of the
companies it currently controls and its focus is to provide
overall support for its controlled subsidiaries with a view to
the improved performance of the organization as a whole.
As a holding company with controlling positions in BankAtlantic
Bancorp and Woodbridge, generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) requires the consolidation of the financial
results of both entities. As a consequence, the assets and
liabilities of both entities are presented on a consolidated
basis in BFCs financial statements. However, except as
otherwise noted, the debts and obligations of the consolidated
entities are not direct obligations of BFC and are non-recourse
to BFC. Similarly, the assets of those entities are not
available to BFC absent a dividend or distribution. The
recognition by BFC of income from controlled entities is
determined based on the total percent of economic ownership in
those entities as shown in the table below.
In September 2008, BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge each
completed a one-for-five reverse split of its common stock.
Where appropriate, amounts throughout this document have been
adjusted to reflect the reverse stock splits effected by
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge. The reverse stock splits
did not impact the Companys proportionate equity interest
or voting rights in BankAtlantic Bancorp or Woodbridge.
BFCs ownership in BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge as
of June 30, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Percent of
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
Ownership
|
|
of Vote
|
|
BankAtlantic Bancorp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock
|
|
|
2,389,697
|
|
|
|
23.28
|
%
|
|
|
12.34
|
%
|
Class B Common Stock
|
|
|
975,225
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
47.00
|
%
|
Total
|
|
|
3,364,922
|
|
|
|
29.94
|
%
|
|
|
59.34
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodbridge Holdings Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock
|
|
|
3,735,392
|
|
|
|
22.45
|
%
|
|
|
11.90
|
%
|
Class B Common Stock
|
|
|
243,807
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
47.00
|
%
|
Total
|
|
|
3,979,199
|
|
|
|
23.57
|
%
|
|
|
58.90
|
%
|
The Class A Common Stock of each of BankAtlantic Bancorp
and Woodbridge is entitled to one vote per share, which in the
aggregate represents 53% of the combined voting power of
Class A and Class B Common Stock of the companies. The
Class B Common Stock, of each company is owned by BFC and
represents the remaining 47% of the combined vote of the two
classes of stock. Because BFC controls more than 50% of the vote
of each of BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge, they are
consolidated in our financial statements instead of carried on
an equity basis.
111
Our corporate website is www.bfcfinancial.com. The
Companys annual report on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K
and all amendments to those reports are available free of charge
through our website, as soon as reasonably practicable after
such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the
SEC. The Companys Internet website and the information
contained on or connected to it are not incorporated into this
joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Recent
Developments
In May 2008, we were notified by the NYSE Arca, Inc. that we did
not meet the continuing listing requirements of the NYSE Arca as
the market value of our publicly held shares was not in excess
of $15 million and the average closing price per share of
our Class A Common Stock was not in excess of $1.00 for a
consecutive 30
trading-day
period. Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the NYSE Arca,
the Company was granted a six-month period to comply with these
continued listing requirements. Because compliance was not
achieved within this six-month period the Company was notified
by the NYSE Arca that its Class A Common Stock was
suspended from trading on the NYSE Arca prior to the opening of
the market on Tuesday, December 9, 2008. Since,
December 9, 2008, BFCs Class A Common Stock has
been quoted on the Pink Sheets under the ticker symbol
BFCF.PK.
In September 2008, BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge each
completed a one-for-five reverse split of its common stock. The
reverse stock splits did not impact the Companys
proportionate equity interest or voting rights in BankAtlantic
Bancorp or Woodbridge. Where appropriate, amounts throughout
this document have been adjusted to reflect the reverse stock
splits effected by BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge.
In December 2008, the Company filed an amendment to its Articles
of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation (the
Amendment) with the State of Florida to amend
certain designated relative rights, preferences and limitations
for the Companys 5% Preferred Stock. For additional
information, see Note 34 to our audited consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
In August 2008 and December 2008, BFC purchased an aggregate of
400,000 shares and 323,848 shares, respectively, of
BankAtlantic Bancorps Class A Common Stock on the
open market for an aggregate purchase price of $2.8 million
and $1.1 million, respectively. BFCs August 2008 and
December 2008 acquisitions of BankAtlantic Bancorps
Class A common stock increased BFCs ownership
interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp by approximately 3.6% in August
2008 and 2.9% in December 2008 and increased BFCs voting
interest by approximately 2.1% in August 2008 and 1.6% in
December 2008. The acquisitions of additional shares of
BankAtlantic Bancorp have been accounted for as step
acquisitions under the purchase method of accounting. See
Note 2 to our audited consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus for
further information. BFC may in the future seek to increase its
ownership in BankAtlantic Bancorp but there is no assurance that
it will be successful.
On October 21, 2006, the Companys Board of Directors
approved the repurchase of up to 1,750,000 shares of our
Class A Common Stock through open market or private
transactions at an aggregate cost of no more than
$10 million. The timing and amount of repurchases, if any,
will depend on market conditions, share price, trading volume
and other factors, and there is no assurance that the Company
will repurchase shares during any period. No termination date
was set for the repurchase program. All shares repurchased by us
will be cancelled and retired. In 2008, the Company repurchased
in the open market an aggregate of 100,000 shares for an
aggregate purchase price of $54,000 and 1,650,000 shares of
the Companys Class A Common Stock remain available
for repurchase under the plan.
BFCs shift in business focus, coupled with more recent
economic developments caused the Company to reconsider its
previously disclosed tax planning strategy wherein the Company
had intended to sell BankAtlantic Bancorp Class A Common
Stock in order to generate sufficient taxable income to utilize
expiring net operating loss (NOLs) carryforwards.
Because BFC believes that its best long term potential is more
likely to occur through the growth of the companies it controls,
BFCs current business strategy is to hold its investment
in BankAtlantic Bancorp indefinitely and no longer intends to
pursue such a tax planning strategy. Accordingly, based on the
Companys change in intent as to the expected manner of
recovery of its
112
investment in BankAtlantic Bancorp, the Company reversed its
deferred tax liability of $29.3 million during the quarter
ended September 30, 2008.
With regard to BFCs deferred tax asset resulting from its
NOLs, a valuation allowance was required because based on
available evidence, it was determined that it is more likely
than not that all or some portion of the asset will not be
realized, and BFC is not generating sufficient taxable income to
utilize the benefit of the deferred tax asset. Because it is
more likely than not that the NOLs included in BFCs
deferred tax assets will not be realized, the Company
established a valuation allowance of approximately
$28.3 million in 2008.
Developments relating to BankAtlantic Bancorp are discussed
below in our discussion on Financial Services. Developments
relating to Woodbridge are discussed in the Information
About Woodbridge section.
Business
Segments
We report our results of operations through five reportable
segments, which are: BFC Activities, BankAtlantic, BankAtlantic
Bancorp Other Operations, Land Division and Woodbridge Other
Operations.
The Companys results of operations in BankAtlantic Bancorp
are included in our Financial Services activities and consists
of two reportable segments BankAtlantic and
BankAtlantic Bancorp Other Operations. The Companys
results of operations in Woodbridge are included in our Real
Estate Development activities and consist of two reportable
segments Land Division and Woodbridge Other
Operations.
BFC
Activities Segment
The BFC Activities segment includes all of the operations and
all of the assets owned by BFC other than BankAtlantic Bancorp
and its subsidiaries and Woodbridge and its subsidiaries.
Additional information relating to the BFC Activities segment is
included in the information set forth in BFCs
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations section and in
Note 4 to BFCs audited consolidated financial
statements, in each case included elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus.
The BFC Activities segment operations consist
primarily of shared service operations. Pursuant to the terms of
shared service agreements between BFC, BankAtlantic Bancorp and
Woodbridge, BFC provides shared service operations in the areas
of human resources, risk management, investor relations,
executive office administration and other services to
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge. Additionally, BFC provides
certain risk management and administrative services to
Bluegreen. The costs of shared services are allocated based upon
the usage of the respective services. This segment also includes
BFCs overhead expenses, interest income and dividend
income from BFCs investment in Benihanas convertible
preferred stock, the financial results of a venture partnership
that BFC controls, and financial results from BFC/CCC, Inc.
(formerly known as Cypress Creek Capital, Inc.)
(BFC/CCC). BFCs equity investments include its
investment in shares of the Series B Convertible Preferred
Stock of Benihana and securities in the technology sector owned
by a partnership that is included in the consolidated financial
statements of BFC as a result of BFCs status as a general
partner of that partnership.
Benihana
Benihana is a NASDAQ-listed company with two listed classes of
common shares: Common Stock (BNHN) and Class A Common Stock
(BNHNA). BFC owns 800,000 shares of Benihana Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock (Convertible Preferred
Stock). The Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible
into an aggregate of 1,578,943 shares of Benihanas
Common Stock at a conversion price of $12.6667, subject to
adjustment from time to time upon certain defined events. Based
on the number of currently outstanding shares of Benihanas
capital stock, the Convertible Preferred Stock, if converted,
would represent an approximately 19% voting interest and an
approximately 9.4% economic interest in Benihana. Historically,
the Companys investment in Benihanas Convertible
Preferred Stock has been classified as investment securities and
has been carried at historical cost.
The Convertible Preferred Stock was acquired pursuant to an
agreement on June 8, 2004 with Benihana to purchase an
aggregate of 800,000 shares of Convertible Preferred Stock
for $25.00 per share. The shares of
113
the Convertible Preferred Stock have voting rights on an
as if converted basis together with Benihanas
Common Stock on all matters put to a vote of the holders of
Benihanas Common Stock. The approval of a majority of the
holders of the Convertible Preferred Stock then outstanding,
voting as a single class, is required for certain events outside
the ordinary course of business. Holders of the Convertible
Preferred Stock are entitled to receive cumulative quarterly
dividends at an annual rate equal to $1.25 per share, payable on
the last day of each calendar quarter. The Convertible Preferred
Stock is subject to mandatory redemption at the original issue
price plus accumulated dividends on July 2, 2014 unless the
holders of a majority of the outstanding Convertible Preferred
Stock elect to extend the mandatory redemption date to a later
date not to extend beyond July 2, 2024. In addition, the
Convertible Preferred Stock may be redeemed by Benihana for a
limited period beginning three years from the date of issue if
the price of Benihanas Common Stock is at least $25.33 for
sixty consecutive trading days. At December 31, 2008, the
closing price of Benihanas Common Stock was $2.10 per
share. The market value of the Convertible Preferred Stock on an
as if converted basis at December 31, 2008 would have been
approximately $3.3 million. During the quarter ended
December 31, 2008, the Company performed an impairment
review of its investment in Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock
to determine if an impairment adjustment was needed. Based on
the evaluation and the review of various qualitative and
quantitative factors, including the decline in the underlying
trading value of Benihanas common stock and the redemption
provisions, the Company determined that there was an
other-than-temporary decline of approximately $3.6 million,
and accordingly, the investment was written down to its fair
value of approximately $16.4 million. Concurrent with
managements evaluation of the impairment of this
investment at December 31, 2008, it made the determination
to reclassify this investment from investment securities which
are carried at cost to investment securities available for sale
in accordance with SFAS No. 115, Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.
In December 2008, the Company filed an amendment to its Articles
of Incorporation which requires the Company to redeem shares of
the Companys Preferred Stock with the net proceeds the
Company may receive in the event (i) the Company sells any
of its shares of Benihana Preferred Stock, (ii) the Company
sells any shares of Benihanas common stock received upon
conversion of the Benihana Preferred Stock or
(iii) Benihana redeems any shares of the Benihana Preferred
Stock owned by the Company. Additionally, the Amendment entitles
the holders of the Preferred Stock to receive directly from
Benihana certain payments on the shares of Benihana Preferred
Stock owned by the Company, in the event the Company defaults on
its obligation to make dividend payments on the Preferred Stock.
For further information, see Note 34 to the audited
consolidated financial statements of BFC included elsewhere in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
Employees
Management believes that its relations with its employees are
satisfactory. The Company currently maintains employee benefit
programs that are considered by management to be generally
competitive with programs provided by other major employers in
its markets.
The number of employees at the indicated dates was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Full-Time
|
|
Part-Time
|
|
Full-Time
|
|
Part-Time
|
|
BFC
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
At December 31, 2008, BFC had eight full time employees and
one part time employee dedicated to BFC operations in the
Companys executive, administrative and finance areas and
twenty nine employees in our shared services operations in the
areas of investor relations, human resources, risk management
and executive office administration. These shared service
employees are utilized by the affiliated entities and their
costs are allocated to the affiliated companies based upon their
usage of services.
114
Financial
Services Segments
BFCs Financial Services activities are comprised of the
operations of BankAtlantic Bancorp. BankAtlantic Bancorp
presents its results in two reportable segments and its results
of operations are consolidated with BFC Financial Corporation.
The only assets available to BFC Financial Corporation from
BankAtlantic Bancorp are dividends when and if declared and paid
by BankAtlantic Bancorp. BankAtlantic Bancorp is a separate
public company and its management prepared the following
discussion which was included in BankAtlantic Bancorps
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, references to
the Company, we, us ,
our or Parent Company in this
Financial Services Segments section are references
to BankAtlantic Bancorp and its subsidiaries, and are not
references to BFC Financial Corporation.
BankAtlantic
Bancorp the Company
We are a Florida-based bank holding company and own BankAtlantic
and its subsidiaries. BankAtlantic provides a full line of
products and services encompassing retail and business banking.
We report our operations through two business segments
consisting of BankAtlantic and BankAtlantic Bancorp, the Parent
Company. Detailed operating financial information by segment is
included in Note 30 to the Companys consolidated
financial statements. On February 28, 2007, the Company
completed the sale to Stifel Financial Corp.
(Stifel) of Ryan Beck Holdings, Inc. (Ryan
Beck), a subsidiary engaged in retail and institutional
brokerage and investment banking. As a consequence, the Company
exited this line of business and the results of operations of
Ryan Beck are presented as Discontinued Operations
in the Companys consolidated financial statements for the
years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.
Our Internet website address is
www.bankatlanticbancorp.com. Our annual report on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K
and all amendments to those reports are available free of charge
through our website, as soon as reasonably practicable after
such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the
SEC. Our Internet website and the information contained in or
connected to our website are not incorporated herein.
As of December 31, 2008, we had total consolidated assets
of approximately $5.8 billion and stockholders equity
of approximately $244 million.
BankAtlantic
BankAtlantic is a federally-chartered, federally-insured savings
bank organized in 1952. It is one of the largest financial
institutions headquartered in Florida and provides traditional
retail banking services and a wide range of business banking
products and related financial services through a network of
more than 100 branches or stores in southeast and
central Florida and the Tampa Bay area, primarily in the
metropolitan areas surrounding the cities of Miami,
Ft. Lauderdale, West Palm Beach and Tampa, which are
located in the heavily-populated Florida counties of Miami-Dade,
Broward, Palm Beach, Hillsborough and Pinellas.
BankAtlantics primary business activities include:
|
|
|
|
|
attracting checking and savings deposits from individuals and
business customers,
|
|
|
|
originating commercial real estate, middle market, consumer and
small business loans,
|
|
|
|
purchasing wholesale residential loans, and
|
|
|
|
investing in mortgage-backed securities, tax certificates and
other securities.
|
BankAtlantics
business strategy
BankAtlantic is currently focusing its efforts in the following
areas:
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing the Banks Floridas Most
Convenient Bank Initiative. BankAtlantic
began its Floridas Most Convenient Bank
initiative in 2002, when it introduced
seven-day
banking in Florida. This banking initiative resulted in a
significant increase in core deposits (demand deposit accounts,
NOW
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
checking accounts and savings accounts). BankAtlantics
core deposits increased from approximately $600 million as
of December 31, 2001 to $2.2 billion as of
December 31, 2008. We believe the competitive market for
deposits, the impact of the recession on our customers as well
as reduced confidence in the banking system negatively impacted
the growth of core deposits, which at December 31, 2008
declined by $151.0 million or 7% from December 31,
2007. While we believe that the decrease is a reflection of what
is happening in the market generally, we are implementing
strategies which we believe will enhance customer loyalty with
our current customers and attract new customers in an effort to
increase our core deposit balances.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintaining and Strengthening our Capital
Position. BankAtlantic exceeded all applicable
regulatory capital requirements and was considered a well
capitalized financial institution at December 31,
2008. See Regulation and Supervision
Capital Requirements for an explanation of capital
standards. Management has implemented initiatives with a view to
preserving capital in response to the current recessionary
economic environment. These initiatives include reducing assets
as a result of loan and securities repayments in the ordinary
course, eliminating cash dividends to the Parent Company,
consolidating back-office facilities, decreasing store and call
center hours, reducing staffing levels and marketing expenses,
selling its central Florida stores, delaying its retail network
expansion, and pursuing efforts to improve other operational
efficiencies.
|
|
|
|
Managing Credit Risk. BankAtlantic believes
that its underwriting policies and procedures are structured to
enable it to offer products and services to its customers while
minimizing its exposure to credit risk. However, the economic
recession and the substantial decline in real estate values
throughout the United States, and particularly in Florida, have
had an adverse impact on the credit quality of our loan
portfolio. In response, BankAtlantic has attempted to address
credit risk through steps which include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specifically monitored certain commercial and residential land
acquisition, development and construction loans and related
collateral;
|
|
|
|
Focused efforts and enhanced staffing relating to loan work-outs
and collection processes;
|
|
|
|
Suspended the origination of land and residential acquisition,
development and construction loans;
|
|
|
|
Transferred $101.5 million of non-performing commercial
real estate loans to the Parent Company in March 2008;
|
|
|
|
Substantially reduced home equity loan originations based on the
implementation of new underwriting requirements;
|
|
|
|
Terminated certain home equity loan unused lines of credit based
on declines in borrower credit scores or the value of loan
collateral; and
|
|
|
|
Increased the frequency of targeted loan reviews.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reducing Operating Expenses. Management
continued initiatives to decrease operating expenses during
2008, including lowering advertising and marketing expenditures,
exiting the Orlando market, reducing store hours, shortening
call center hours, reducing staffing levels, renegotiating
vendor contracts, outsourcing certain back-office functions, and
consolidating back-office operations. During 2009, management
intends to seek to further reduce costs in a manner which does
not materially impact the quality of customer service.
BankAtlantic is also continuing to evaluate its products and
services as well as its delivery systems and back-office support
infrastructure with a view to providing cost effective and
profitable products and services to its customers.
|
|
|
|
Diversification of BankAtlantics Loan
Portfolio. BankAtlantic is focused on the
diversification of its loan portfolio. During 2009 BankAtlantic
intends to seek to generate a greater percentage of small
business and middle market commercial non-mortgage loans through
its retail and lending network. As middle market and small
business loans grow, we expect that commercial real estate loan
portfolio
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
balances and residential mortgage loans will decline during 2009
through the scheduled repayment of existing loans and
significant reductions in commercial real estate loan
originations.
|
Loan
Products
BankAtlantic offers a number of lending products to its
customers. Historically, primary lending products have included
residential loans, commercial real estate loans, commercial
business loans, consumer loans and small business loans.
Residential: Historically, BankAtlantic has
purchased residential loans in the secondary markets that have
been originated by other institutions. These loans, which are
serviced by independent servicers, are secured by properties
located throughout the United States. When BankAtlantic
purchases residential loans, it evaluates the originators
underwriting of the loans and, for most individual loans,
performs confirming credit analyses. Residential loans are
typically purchased in bulk and are generally non-conforming
loans under agency guidelines due to the size of the individual
loans. BankAtlantic sets general guidelines for loan purchases
relating to loan amount, type of property, state of residence,
loan-to-value ratios, the borrowers sources of funds,
appraised amounts and loan documentation, but actual purchases
will generally reflect availability and market conditions, and
may vary from BankAtlantics general guidelines. The
weighted average FICO credit scores and loan-to-value ratios
(calculated at the time of origination) of purchased loans
outstanding as of December 31, 2008 was 742 and 68%,
respectively, and the original back end debt ratio was a
weighted average of 33%. Included in these purchased residential
loans are interest-only loans. These loans result in possible
future increases in a borrowers loan payments when the
contractually required repayments increase due to interest rate
adjustments and when required amortization of the principal
amount commences. These payment increases could affect a
borrowers ability to repay the loan and lead to increased
defaults and losses. At December 31, 2008,
BankAtlantics residential loan portfolio included
$980 million of interest-only loans, $44.8 million of
which will become fully amortizing and have interest rates reset
in 2009. The credit scores and loan-to-value ratios for
interest-only loans are similar to amortizing loans.
BankAtlantic has attempted to manage the credit risk associated
with these loans by limiting purchases of interest-only loans to
those originated to borrowers that it believes to be credit
worthy, with loan-to-value and total debt to income ratios
within agency guidelines. BankAtlantic does not purchase
sub-prime, option-arm,
pick-a-payment
or negative amortizing residential loans. Loans in the purchased
residential loan portfolio generally do not have prepayment
penalties.
BankAtlantic also originates residential loans to customers that
are then sold on a servicing released basis to a correspondent.
It also originates and holds certain residential loans, which
are made primarily to low to moderate income
borrowers in accordance with requirements of the Community
Reinvestment Act. The underwriting of these loans generally
follows government agency guidelines and independent appraisers
typically perform
on-site
inspections and valuations of the collateral. The outstanding
balance of the loans in this portfolio at December 31, 2008
was $70 million.
Commercial Real Estate: BankAtlantic provides
commercial real estate loans for acquisition, development and
construction of various types of properties including office
buildings and retail shopping centers. BankAtlantic also
provides loans to acquire or refinance existing income-producing
properties. These loans are primarily secured by property
located in Florida. Commercial real estate loans are generally
originated in amounts based upon the appraised value of the
collateral or estimated cost to construct, generally have a loan
to value ratio at the time of origination of less than 80%, and
generally require that one or more of the principals of the
borrowing entity guarantee these loans. Most of these loans have
variable interest rates and are indexed to either prime or LIBOR
rates.
Historically, we made three categories of commercial real estate
loans that we believe have resulted in significant exposure to
BankAtlantic based on declines in the Florida residential real
estate market. We discontinued the origination of these loan
products in 2007. These categories are builder land bank loans,
land acquisition and development loans, and land acquisition,
development and construction loans. The builder land bank loan
category consists of land loans to borrowers who have or had
land purchase option agreements with regional
and/or
national builders. These loans were originally underwritten
based on projected sales of the
117
developed lots to the builders/option holders, and timely
repayment of the loans is primarily dependent upon the sale of
the property pursuant to the options. If the lots are not sold
as originally anticipated, BankAtlantic anticipates that the
borrower may not be in a position to service the loan, with the
likely result being an increase in nonperforming loans and loan
losses in this category. The land acquisition and development
loan category consists of loans secured by residential land
which was intended to be developed by the borrower and sold to
homebuilders. We believe that the underwriting on these loans
was generally more stringent than builder land bank loans, as an
option agreement with a regional or national builder did not
exist at the origination date. The land acquisition, development
and construction loans are secured by residential land which was
intended to be fully developed by the borrower who also might
have plans to construct homes on the property. These loans
generally involved property with a longer investment and
development horizon, are guaranteed by the borrower or
individuals
and/or are
secured by additional collateral or equity such that it is
expected that the borrower will have the ability to service the
debt for a longer period of time.
BankAtlantic has historically sold participations in commercial
real estate loans that it originated, and administers the loan
and provides participants periodic reports on the progress of
the project for which the loan was made. Major decisions
regarding the loans are made by the participants on either a
majority or unanimous basis. As a result, BankAtlantic generally
cannot significantly modify the loans without either majority or
unanimous consent of the participants. BankAtlantics sale
of loan participations has the effect of reducing its exposure
on individual projects and was required in some cases, in order
to comply with the regulatory loans to one borrower
limitations. BankAtlantic has also purchased commercial real
estate loan participations from other financial institutions and
in such cases BankAtlantic may not be in a position to control
decisions made with respect to the loans.
Commercial Business: BankAtlantic generally
makes commercial business loans to medium sized companies in
Florida. It lends on both a secured and unsecured basis,
although the majority of its loans are secured. Commercial
business loans are typically secured by the receivables,
inventory, equipment, real estate,
and/or
general corporate assets of the borrowers. Commercial business
loans generally have variable interest rates that are prime or
LIBOR-based. These loans are typically originated for terms
ranging from one to five years.
Standby Letters of Credit and
Commitments: Standby letters of credit are
conditional commitments issued by BankAtlantic to guarantee the
performance of a customer to a third party. The credit risk
involved in issuing letters of credit is the same as extending
loans to customers. BankAtlantic may hold certificates of
deposit, liens on corporate assets and liens on residential and
commercial property as collateral for letters of credit.
BankAtlantic issues commitments for commercial real estate and
commercial business loans.
Consumer: Consumer loans primarily consist of
loans to individuals originated through BankAtlantics
retail network. Approximately 90% of originations are home
equity lines of credit secured by a first or second mortgage on
the primary residence of the borrower. Approximately 20% of home
equity lines of credit balances are secured by a first mortgage
on the property. Home equity lines of credit have prime-based
interest rates and generally mature in 15 years. Other
consumer loans generally have fixed interest rates with terms
ranging from one to five years. The credit quality of consumer
loans is adversely impacted by increases in the unemployment
rate and declining real estate values. During 2008, BankAtlantic
experienced higher than historical losses in this portfolio as a
result of deteriorating economic conditions. In an attempt to
address this issue, BankAtlantic has adopted more stringent
underwriting criteria for consumer loans which has the effect of
significantly reducing consumer loan originations.
Small Business: BankAtlantic originates small
business loans to companies located primarily in markets within
BankAtlantics store network. Small business loans are
primarily originated on a secured basis and generally do not
exceed $1.0 million for non-real estate secured loans and
$2.0 million for real estate secured loans. These loans are
generally originated with maturities ranging from one to three
years or upon demand; however, loans collateralized by real
estate could have terms of up to fifteen years. Lines of credit
extended to small businesses are due upon demand. Small business
loans have either fixed or variable prime-based interest rates.
During 2009, BankAtlantic intends to target small business
lending to specific industries that it believes may lead to
profitable customer relationships.
118
The composition of the loan portfolio was (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Pct
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Pct
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Pct
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Pct
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Pct
|
|
|
Loans receivable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$
|
1,930
|
|
|
|
45.34
|
|
|
|
2,156
|
|
|
|
47.66
|
|
|
|
2,151
|
|
|
|
46.81
|
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
|
|
43.92
|
|
|
|
2,057
|
|
|
|
45.16
|
%
|
Consumer home equity
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
|
16.89
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
|
|
14.94
|
|
|
|
562
|
|
|
|
12.23
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
11.12
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
10.03
|
|
Construction and development
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
7.07
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
9.20
|
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
10.34
|
|
|
|
785
|
|
|
|
16.99
|
|
|
|
766
|
|
|
|
16.82
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
21.85
|
|
|
|
882
|
|
|
|
19.49
|
|
|
|
973
|
|
|
|
21.17
|
|
|
|
979
|
|
|
|
21.18
|
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
|
|
22.04
|
|
Small business
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
5.14
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
4.69
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
4.07
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
3.29
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
2.72
|
|
Loans to Levitt Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
Other loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
3.36
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
2.90
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
3.42
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
1.90
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
2.04
|
|
Small business non-mortgage
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
2.54
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
2.34
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
2.13
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
1.80
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
1.47
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
0.61
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
0.68
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
0.59
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
Residential loans held for sale
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,379
|
|
|
|
102.87
|
|
|
|
4,614
|
|
|
|
101.99
|
|
|
|
4,638
|
|
|
|
100.94
|
|
|
|
4,661
|
|
|
|
100.85
|
|
|
|
4,600
|
|
|
|
100.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned discounts (premiums)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
2.94
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
2.08
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
0.96
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
0.89
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
1.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans receivable, net
|
|
$
|
4,257
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
4,524
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
4,595
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
4,622
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
4,555
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2008, BankAtlantic transferred
$101.5 million of non-performing commercial loans to a
subsidiary of the Parent Company.
Included in BankAtlantics commercial, construction and
development loan portfolio was the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Builder land bank loans
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
Land acquisition and development loans
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
Land acquisition, development and construction loans
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial residential development loans(1)
|
|
$
|
304
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
At March 31, 2008, $101.5 million of non-performing
loans were transferred to a subsidiary of the Parent Company. |
119
Investments
Securities Available for Sale: BankAtlantic
invests in obligations of, or securities guaranteed by the
U.S. government or its agencies, such as mortgage-backed
securities and real estate mortgage investment conduits
(REMICs), which are accounted for as securities available for
sale. BankAtlantics securities available for sale
portfolio at December 31, 2008 reflects a decision to seek
high credit quality and securities guaranteed by government
sponsored enterprises in an attempt to minimize credit risk in
its investment portfolio to the extent possible. The available
for sale securities portfolio serves as a source of liquidity
while at the same time provides a means to moderate the effects
of interest rate changes. The decision to purchase and sell
securities from time to time is based upon a current assessment
of the economy, the interest rate environment, and capital and
liquidity strategies and requirements. BankAtlantics
investment portfolio does not include credit default swaps,
commercial paper, collateralized debt obligations, structured
investment vehicles, auction rate securities or equity
securities in Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac.
Tax Certificates: Tax certificates are
evidences of tax obligations that are sold through auctions or
bulk sales by various state and local taxing authorities.
Certain municipalities bulk sale their entire tax certificates
for the prior year by auctioning the portfolio to the highest
bidder instead of auctioning each property. The tax obligation
arises when the property owner fails to timely pay the real
estate taxes on the property. Tax certificates represent a
priority lien against the real property for the delinquent real
estate taxes. The minimum repayment to satisfy the lien is the
certificate amount plus the interest accrued through the
redemption date, plus applicable penalties, fees and costs. Tax
certificates have no payment schedule or stated maturity. If the
certificate holder does not file for the deed within established
time frames, the certificate may become null and void and lose
its value. BankAtlantics experience with this type of
investment has generally been favorable because the rates earned
are generally higher than many alternative investments and
substantial repayments typically occur over a one-year period.
During 2008, BankAtlantic discontinued acquiring tax
certificates through bulk sale auctions as it experienced higher
than historical losses on legacy bulk purchased tax certificates
which included properties in distressed areas outside the State
of Florida.
Derivative Investments: From time to time,
based on market conditions, BankAtlantic writes call options on
recently purchased agency securities (covered
calls). Management pursues this periodic investment
strategy when it believes it will generate non-interest income
or alternatively, the acquisition of agency securities on
desirable terms. BankAtlantic had no derivative investments
outstanding as of December 31, 2008.
120
The composition, yields and maturities of BankAtlantics
securities available for sale, investment securities and tax
certificates were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Tax-Exempt
|
|
|
Backed
|
|
|
Bond
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Certificates
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One year or less
|
|
$
|
224,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224,434
|
|
|
|
6.68
|
%
|
After one through five years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
3.98
|
|
After five through ten years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,885
|
|
|
|
5.16
|
|
After ten years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
662,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
662,238
|
|
|
|
4.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair values(2)
|
|
$
|
224,434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
699,224
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
923,908
|
|
|
|
5.25
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost(2)
|
|
$
|
213,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
687,344
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
901,128
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average yield based on fair values
|
|
|
6.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.79
|
|
|
|
4.30
|
|
|
|
5.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average maturity (yrs)
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.95
|
|
|
|
1.67
|
|
|
|
18.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair values(2)
|
|
$
|
188,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
788,461
|
|
|
|
681
|
|
|
|
977,543
|
|
|
|
5.90
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost(2)
|
|
$
|
188,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
785,682
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
|
974,768
|
|
|
|
6.06
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair values(2)
|
|
$
|
195,391
|
|
|
|
397,244
|
|
|
|
361,750
|
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
|
955,060
|
|
|
|
6.17
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost(2)
|
|
$
|
195,391
|
|
|
|
397,469
|
|
|
|
365,565
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
|
959,110
|
|
|
|
6.05
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Except for tax certificates, maturities are based upon
contractual maturities. Tax certificates do not have stated
maturities, and estimates in the above table are based upon
historical repayment experience (generally 1 to 2 years). |
|
(2) |
|
Equity and tax exempt securities held by the Parent Company with
a cost of $3.6 million, $162.6 million, and
$88.6 million and a fair value of $4.1 million,
$179.5 million, and $99.9 million, at
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, were
excluded from the above table. At December 31, 2008,
equities held by BankAtlantic with a cost of $0.8 million
and a fair value of $0.8 million was excluded from the
above table. |
121
A summary of the amortized cost and gross unrealized
appreciation or depreciation of estimated fair value of tax
certificates and investment securities and available for sale
securities follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Appreciation
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Tax certificates and investment securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost equals market
|
|
$
|
213,534
|
|
|
|
10,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224,434
|
|
Securities available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost equals market
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
Market over cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost over market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost equals market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market over cost
|
|
|
654,199
|
|
|
|
12,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
667,062
|
|
Cost over market
|
|
|
33,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
983
|
|
|
|
32,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
901,128
|
|
|
|
23,763
|
|
|
|
983
|
|
|
|
923,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The above table excludes Parent Company equity securities with a
cost of $3.6 million and a fair value of $4.1 million
at December 31, 2008. At December 31, 2008, equities
held by BankAtlantic with a cost of $0.8 million and a fair
value of $0.8 million was excluded from the above table. |
Deposit
products and borrowed funds:
Deposits: BankAtlantic offers checking and
savings accounts to individuals and business customers. These
include commercial demand deposit accounts, retail demand
deposit accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts,
certificates of deposit, various NOW accounts and IRA and Keogh
retirement accounts. BankAtlantic also obtains deposits from
brokers and municipalities. BankAtlantic solicits deposits from
customers in its geographic market through marketing and
relationship banking activities primarily conducted through its
sales force and store network. BankAtlantic primarily solicits
deposits at its branches (or stores) through its
Floridas Most Convenient Bank initiative.
During 2008, BankAtlantic began participating in the Certificate
of Deposit Account Registry Services (CDARS)
program. This program allows BankAtlantic to offer to its
customers federally insured deposits up to $50 million.
BankAtlantic has also elected to participate in the FDICs
Transaction Account Guarantee Program whereby the
FDIC through December 31, 2009 fully insures
BankAtlantics entire portfolio of non-interest bearing
deposits, and interest-bearing deposits with rates at or below
fifty basis points and, subject to applicable terms, insures up
to $250,000 of other deposit accounts.
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)
Advances: BankAtlantic is a member of the FHLB of
Atlanta and can obtain secured advances from the FHLB of
Atlanta. These advances can be collateralized by a security lien
against its residential loans, certain commercial loans and its
securities. In addition, BankAtlantic must maintain certain
levels of FHLB stock based upon outstanding advances.
Other Short-Term
Borrowings: BankAtlantics short-term
borrowings consist of securities sold under agreements to
repurchase, treasury tax and loan borrowings, term auction
facilities, and federal funds.
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase include a sale of
a portion of its current investment portfolio (usually
mortgage-backed securities and REMICs) at a negotiated rate and
an agreement to repurchase the same assets on a specified future
date. BankAtlantic issues repurchase agreements to institutions
and to its customers. These transactions are collateralized by
securities in its investment portfolio but are not insured by
the FDIC.
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury tax and loan borrowings represent BankAtlantics
participation in the Federal Reserve Treasury Investment
Program. Under this program the Federal Reserve places funds
with BankAtlantic obtained from treasury tax and loan payments
received by financial institutions.
|
|
|
|
Federal funds borrowings occur under established facilities with
various federally-insured banking institutions to purchase
federal funds. We also have a borrowing facility with various
federal agencies which may place funds with us at overnight
rates. BankAtlantic uses these facilities on an overnight basis
to assist in managing its cash requirements. These advances are
collateralized by a security lien against its consumer loans.
|
|
|
|
Term auction facilities represent short term borrowings from the
Federal Reserve System. These borrowings are collateralized by
securities available for sale and are generally at federal fund
interest rates which have been lower interest rates than
alternative borrowings.
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantics other borrowings have floating interest
rates and consist of a mortgage-backed bond and subordinated
debentures.
|
Parent
Company
The Parent Company (Parent) operations primarily
consist of financing of the capital needs of BankAtlantic and
its subsidiaries and management of the asset work-out subsidiary
and other investments. In March 2008, the Parent Company
used a portion of its proceeds obtained from the Ryan Beck sale
to Stifel to form an asset work-out subsidiary which purchased
from BankAtlantic $101.5 million of non-performing loans at
BankAtlantics carrying value. The work-out subsidiary has
entered into an agreement with BankAtlantic to service the
transferred non-performing loans. The Parent also has
arrangements with BFC Financial Corporation (BFC)
for BFC to provide certain human resources, insurance
management, investor relations, and other administrative
services to the Parent and its subsidiaries. The Parent obtains
its funds from issuances of equity and debt securities, proceeds
from sales of investment securities, returns on portfolio
investments, repayments and pay downs of loans in its workout
subsidiary and dividends from its subsidiaries. The Parent
provides funds to its subsidiaries as capital contributions for
general corporate purposes. The largest expense of the Parent
Company is interest expense on junior subordinated debentures
issued in connection with trust preferred securities. The
Company has the right to defer quarterly payments of interest on
the junior subordinated debentures for a period not to exceed 20
consecutive quarters without default or penalty. In February and
March 2009, the Company notified the trustees under its junior
subordinated debentures that it has elected to defer its
quarterly interest payments. During the deferral period, the
respective trusts will likewise suspend the declaration and
payment of dividends on the trust preferred securities.
Additionally, during the deferral period, the Company will not
pay dividends on or repurchase its common stock. The Parent
Company deferred the interest and dividend payments in order to
preserve its liquidity in response to current economic
conditions.
The Company had the following cash and investments as of
December 31, 2008. There is no assurance that these
investments will maintain the estimated fair value indicated on
the table below or that we would receive proceeds equal to
estimated fair value upon the liquidation of these investments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Appreciation
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
37,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,116
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
1,597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,597
|
|
Private investment securities
|
|
|
2,036
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
40,749
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company anticipates receiving additional funds currently
estimated at $9.1 million during 2009 as an earn-out
payment associated with the sale of Ryan Beck to Stifel.
123
The Parent Companys work-out subsidiary holds the
following commercial loans with outstanding balances as of
December 31, 2008 by loan category as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Builder land bank loans
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
Land acquisition and development loans
|
|
|
17
|
|
Land acquisition, development and construction loans
|
|
|
29
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial loans
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees
Management believes that its relations with its employees are
satisfactory. The Company currently maintains comprehensive
employee benefit programs that are considered by management to
be generally competitive with programs provided by other major
employers in its markets.
The number of employees at the indicated dates was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Full-Time
|
|
Part-Time
|
|
Full-Time
|
|
Part-Time
|
|
BankAtlantic Bancorp
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic
|
|
|
1,698
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
2,207
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,704
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
2,214
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Competition
The banking and financial services industry is very competitive
and is in a transition period. The financial services industry
is experiencing a severe downturn and there is increased
competition in the marketplace. We expect continued
consolidation in the financial service industry creating larger
financial institutions. Our primary method of competition is
emphasis on relationship banking, customer service and
convenience, including our Floridas Most Convenient Bank
and Local Market Management initiatives.
We face substantial competition for both loans and deposits.
Competition for loans comes principally from other banks,
savings institutions and other lenders. This competition could
decrease the number and size of loans that we make and the
interest rates and fees that we receive on these loans.
We compete for deposits with banks, savings institutions and
credit unions, as well as institutions offering uninsured
investment alternatives, including money market funds and mutual
funds. These competitors may offer higher interest rates than we
do, which could decrease the deposits that we attract or require
us to increase our rates to attract new deposits. Increased
competition for deposits could increase our cost of funds,
reduce our net interest margin and adversely affect our results
of operations.
Regulation
and Supervision
Holding
Company
We are a unitary savings and loan holding company within the
meaning of the Home Owners Loan Act, as amended, or HOLA.
As such, we are registered with the Office of Thrift
Supervision, or OTS, and are subject to OTS regulations,
examinations, supervision and reporting requirements. In
addition, the OTS has enforcement authority over us. Among other
things, this authority permits the OTS to restrict or prohibit
activities that are determined to be a serious risk to the
financial safety, soundness or stability of a subsidiary savings
bank.
124
HOLA prohibits a savings bank holding company, directly or
indirectly, or through one or more subsidiaries, from:
|
|
|
|
|
acquiring another savings institution or its holding company
without prior written approval of the OTS;
|
|
|
|
acquiring or retaining, with certain exceptions, more than 5% of
a non-subsidiary savings institution, a non-subsidiary holding
company, or a non-subsidiary company engaged in activities other
than those permitted by HOLA; or
|
|
|
|
acquiring or retaining control of a depository institution that
is not insured by the FDIC.
|
In evaluating an application by a holding company to acquire a
savings institution, the OTS must consider the financial and
managerial resources and future prospects of the company and
savings institution involved the effect of the acquisition on
the risk to the insurance funds, the convenience and needs of
the community and competitive factors.
As a unitary savings and loan holding company, we generally are
not restricted under existing laws as to the types of business
activities in which we may engage, provided that BankAtlantic
continues to satisfy the Qualified Thrift Lender, or QTL, test.
See Regulation of Federal Savings Banks QTL
Test for a discussion of the QTL requirements. If we were
to make a non-supervisory acquisition of another savings
institution or of a savings institution that meets the QTL test
and is deemed to be a savings institution by the OTS and that
will be held as a separate subsidiary, then we would become a
multiple savings and loan holding company within the meaning of
HOLA and would be subject to limitations on the types of
business activities in which we can engage. HOLA limits the
activities of a multiple savings institution holding company and
its non-insured institution subsidiaries primarily to activities
permissible for bank holding companies under Section 4(c)
of the Bank Holding Company Act, subject to the prior approval
of the OTS, and to other activities authorized by OTS regulation.
Transactions between BankAtlantic, including any of
BankAtlantics subsidiaries, and us or any of
BankAtlantics affiliates, are subject to various
conditions and limitations. See Regulation of Federal
Savings Banks Transactions with Related
Parties. BankAtlantic must seek approval from the OTS
prior to any declaration of the payment of any dividends or
other capital distributions to the Company. See Regulation
of Federal Savings Banks Limitation on Capital
Distributions.
BankAtlantic
BankAtlantic is a federal savings association and is subject to
extensive regulation, examination, and supervision by the OTS,
as its chartering agency and primary regulator, and the FDIC, as
its deposit insurer.
BankAtlantics deposit accounts are insured up to
applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Fund, which is
administered by the FDIC. BankAtlantic must file reports with
the OTS and the FDIC concerning its activities and financial
condition. Additionally, BankAtlantic must obtain regulatory
approvals prior to entering into certain transactions, such as
mergers with, or acquisitions of, other depository institutions,
and must submit applications or notices prior to forming certain
types of subsidiaries or engaging in certain activities through
its subsidiaries. The OTS and the FDIC conduct periodic
examinations to assess BankAtlantics safety and soundness
and compliance with various regulatory requirements. This
regulation and supervision establishes a comprehensive framework
of activities in which a savings bank can engage and is intended
primarily for the protection of the insurance fund and
depositors. The OTS and the FDIC have significant discretion in
connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities and
examination policies. Any change in such applicable activities
or policies, whether by the OTS, the FDIC or the Congress, could
have a material adverse impact on us, BankAtlantic, and our
operations.
The following discussion is intended to be a summary of the
material banking statutes and regulations applicable to
BankAtlantic, and it does not purport to be a comprehensive
description of such statutes and regulations, nor does it
include every federal and state statute and regulation
applicable to BankAtlantic.
125
Regulation
of Federal Savings Banks
Business Activities. BankAtlantic derives its
lending and investment powers from HOLA and the regulations of
the OTS there under. Under these laws and regulations,
BankAtlantic may invest in:
|
|
|
|
|
mortgage loans secured by residential and commercial real estate;
|
|
|
|
commercial and consumer loans;
|
|
|
|
certain types of debt securities; and
|
|
|
|
certain other assets.
|
BankAtlantic may also establish service corporations to engage
in activities not otherwise permissible for BankAtlantic,
including certain real estate equity investments and securities
and insurance brokerage. These investment powers are subject to
limitations, including, among others, limitations that require
debt securities acquired by BankAtlantic to meet certain rating
criteria and that limit BankAtlantics aggregate investment
in various types of loans to certain percentages of capital
and/or
assets.
Loans to One Borrower. Under HOLA, savings
banks are generally subject to the same limits on loans to one
borrower as are imposed on national banks. Generally, under
these limits, the total amount of loans and extensions of credit
made by a savings bank to one borrower or related group of
borrowers outstanding at one time and not fully secured by
collateral may not exceed 15% of the savings banks
unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus. In addition to, and
separate from, the 15% limitation, the total amount of loans and
extensions of credit made by a savings bank to one borrower or
related group of borrowers outstanding at one time and fully
secured by readily-marketable collateral may not exceed 10% of
the savings banks unimpaired capital and unimpaired
surplus. Readily-marketable collateral includes certain debt and
equity securities and bullion, but generally does not include
real estate. At December 31, 2008, BankAtlantics
limit on loans to one borrower was approximately
$77.8 million. At December 31, 2008,
BankAtlantics largest aggregate amount of loans to one
borrower was approximately $46.1 million and the second
largest borrower had an aggregate balance of approximately
$37.8 million.
QTL Test. HOLA requires a savings bank to meet
a QTL test by maintaining at least 65% of its portfolio
assets in certain qualified thrift investments
on a monthly average basis in at least nine months out of every
twelve months. A savings bank that fails the QTL test must
either operate under certain restrictions on its activities or
convert to a bank charter. At December 31, 2008,
BankAtlantic maintained approximately 79.0% of its portfolio
assets in qualified thrift investments. BankAtlantic had also
satisfied the QTL test in each of the nine months prior to
December 2008 and, therefore, was a QTL.
Capital Requirements. The OTS regulations
require savings banks to meet three minimum capital standards:
|
|
|
|
|
a tangible capital requirement for savings banks to have
tangible capital in an amount equal to at least 1.5% of adjusted
total assets;
|
|
|
|
a leverage ratio requirement:
|
|
|
|
|
|
for savings banks assigned the highest composite rating of 1, to
have core capital in an amount equal to at least 3% of adjusted
total assets; or
|
|
|
|
for savings banks assigned any other composite rating, to have
core capital in an amount equal to at least 4% of adjusted total
assets, or a higher percentage if warranted by the particular
circumstances or risk profile of the savings bank; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
a risk-based capital requirement for savings banks to have
capital in an amount equal to at least 8% of risk-weighted
assets.
|
In determining the amount of risk-weighted assets for purposes
of the risk-based capital requirement, a savings bank must
compute its risk-based assets by multiplying its assets and
certain off-balance sheet items by risk-weights assigned by the
OTS capital regulations. The OTS monitors the risk management of
individual institutions.
126
The OTS may impose an individual minimum capital requirement on
institutions that it believes exhibit a higher degree of risk.
At December 31, 2008, BankAtlantic exceeded all applicable
regulatory capital requirements.
There currently are no regulatory capital requirements directly
applicable to us as a unitary savings and loan holding company
apart from the regulatory capital requirements for savings banks
that are applicable to BankAtlantic; however, changes in
regulations could result in additional requirements being
imposed on us.
Limitation on Capital Distributions. The OTS
regulations impose limitations upon certain capital
distributions by savings banks, such as certain cash dividends,
payments to repurchase or otherwise acquire its shares, payments
to shareholders of another institution in a cash-out merger and
other distributions charged against capital.
The OTS regulates all capital distributions by BankAtlantic
directly or indirectly to us, including dividend payments.
BankAtlantic currently must file an application to receive the
approval of the OTS for a proposed capital distribution as the
total amount of all of BankAtlantics capital distributions
(including any proposed capital distribution) for the applicable
calendar year exceeds BankAtlantics net income for that
year-to-date period plus BankAtlantics retained net income
for the preceding two years.
BankAtlantic may not pay dividends to the Company if, after
paying those dividends, it would fail to meet the required
minimum levels under risk-based capital guidelines and the
minimum leverage and tangible capital ratio requirements, or in
the event the OTS notified BankAtlantic that it was in need of
more than normal supervision. Under the Federal Deposit
Insurance Act, or FDIA, an insured depository institution such
as BankAtlantic is prohibited from making capital distributions,
including the payment of dividends, if, after making such
distribution, the institution would become
undercapitalized. Payment of dividends by
BankAtlantic also may be restricted at any time at the
discretion of the appropriate regulator if it deems the payment
to constitute an unsafe and unsound banking practice.
Liquidity. BankAtlantic is required to
maintain sufficient liquidity to ensure its safe and sound
operation, in accordance with OTS regulations.
Assessments. The OTS charges assessments to
recover the costs of examining savings banks and their
affiliates, processing applications and other filings, and
covering direct and indirect expenses in regulating savings
banks and their affiliates. These assessments are based on three
components:
|
|
|
|
|
the size of the savings bank, on which the basic assessment is
based;
|
|
|
|
the savings banks supervisory condition, which results in
an additional assessment based on a percentage of the basic
assessment for any savings bank with a composite rating of 3, 4
or 5 in its most recent safety and soundness
examination; and
|
|
|
|
the complexity of the savings banks operations, which
results in an additional assessment based on a percentage of the
basic assessment for any savings bank that has more than
$1 billion in trust assets that it administers, loans that
it services for others or assets covered by its recourse
obligations or direct credit substitutes.
|
These assessments are paid semi-annually. BankAtlantics
assessment expense during the year ended December 31, 2008
was approximately $1.0 million.
Branching. Subject to certain limitations,
HOLA and the OTS regulations permit federally chartered savings
banks to establish branches in any state or territory of the
United States.
Community Reinvestment. Under the Community
Reinvestment Act, or CRA, a savings institution has a continuing
and affirmative obligation consistent with its safe and sound
operation to help meet the credit needs of its entire community,
including low and moderate income neighborhoods. The CRA
requires the OTS to
127
assess the institutions record of meeting the credit needs
of its community and to take such record into account in its
evaluation of certain applications by the institution. This
assessment focuses on three tests:
|
|
|
|
|
a lending test, to evaluate the institutions record of
making loans in its designated assessment areas;
|
|
|
|
an investment test, to evaluate the institutions record of
investing in community development projects, affordable housing,
and programs benefiting low or moderate income individuals and
businesses; and
|
|
|
|
a service test, to evaluate the institutions delivery of
banking services throughout its designated assessment area.
|
The OTS assigns institutions a rating of
outstanding, satisfactory, needs
to improve, or substantial non-compliance. The
CRA requires all institutions to disclose their CRA ratings to
the public. BankAtlantic received a satisfactory
rating in its most recent CRA evaluation. Regulations also
require all institutions to disclose certain agreements that are
in fulfillment of the CRA.
Transactions with Related
Parties. BankAtlantics authority to engage
in transactions with its affiliates is limited by
Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, or FRA, by
Regulation W of the Federal Reserve Board, or FRB,
implementing Sections 23A and 23B of the FRA, and by OTS
regulations. The applicable OTS regulations for savings banks
regarding transactions with affiliates generally conform to the
requirements of Regulation W, which is applicable to
national banks. In general, an affiliate of a savings bank is
any company that controls, is controlled by, or is under common
control with, the savings bank, other than the savings
banks subsidiaries. For instance, we are deemed an
affiliate of BankAtlantic under these regulations.
Generally, Section 23A limits the extent to which a savings
bank may engage in covered transactions with any one
affiliate to an amount equal to 10% of the savings banks
capital stock and surplus, and contains an aggregate limit on
all such transactions with all affiliates to an amount equal to
20% of the savings banks capital stock and surplus. A
covered transaction generally includes:
|
|
|
|
|
making or renewing a loan or other extension of credit to an
affiliate;
|
|
|
|
purchasing, or investing in, a security issued by an affiliate;
|
|
|
|
purchasing an asset from an affiliate;
|
|
|
|
accepting a security issued by an affiliate as collateral for a
loan or other extension of credit to any person or
entity; and
|
|
|
|
issuing a guarantee, acceptance or letter of credit on behalf of
an affiliate.
|
Section 23A also establishes specific collateral
requirements for loans or extensions of credit to, or
guarantees, or acceptances of letters of credit issued on behalf
of, an affiliate. Section 23B requires covered transactions
and certain other transactions to be on terms and under
circumstances, including credit standards, that are
substantially the same, or at least as favorable to the savings
bank, as those prevailing at the time for transactions with or
involving non-affiliates. Additionally, under the OTS
regulations, a savings bank is prohibited from:
|
|
|
|
|
making a loan or other extension of credit to an affiliate that
is engaged in any non-bank holding company activity; and
|
|
|
|
purchasing, or investing in, securities issued by an affiliate
that is not a subsidiary.
|
Sections 22(g) and 22(h) of the FRA, Regulation O of
the FRB, Section 402 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and
OTS regulations impose limitations on loans and extensions of
credit from BankAtlantic and us to its and our executive
officers, directors, controlling shareholders and their related
interests. The applicable OTS regulations for savings banks
regarding loans by a savings bank to its executive officers,
directors and principal shareholders generally conform to the
requirements of Regulation O, which is applicable to
national banks.
128
Enforcement. Under the FDIA, the OTS has
primary enforcement responsibility over savings banks and has
the authority to bring enforcement action against all
institution-affiliated parties, including any
controlling stockholder or any shareholder, attorney, appraiser
and accountant who knowingly or recklessly participates in any
violation of applicable law or regulation, breach of fiduciary
duty, or certain other wrongful actions that have, or are likely
to have, a significant adverse effect on an insured savings bank
or cause it more than minimal loss. In addition, the FDIC has
back-up
authority to take enforcement action for unsafe and unsound
practices. Formal enforcement action can include the issuance of
a capital directive, cease and desist order, removal of officers
and/or
directors, institution of proceedings for receivership or
conservatorship and termination of deposit insurance.
Examination. A savings institution must
demonstrate to the OTS its ability to manage its compliance
responsibilities by establishing an effective and comprehensive
oversight and monitoring program. The degree of compliance
oversight and monitoring by the institutions management
determines the scope and intensity of the OTS examinations
of the institution. Institutions with significant management
oversight and monitoring of compliance will receive less
intrusive OTS examinations than institutions with less oversight.
Standards for Safety and Soundness. Pursuant
to the requirements of the FDIA, the OTS, together with the
other federal bank regulatory agencies, has adopted the
Interagency Guidelines Establishing Standards for Safety and
Soundness, or the Guidelines. The Guidelines establish general
safety and soundness standards relating to internal controls,
information and internal audit systems, loan documentation,
credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth, asset
quality, earnings and compensation, fees and benefits. In
general, the Guidelines require, among other things, appropriate
systems and practices to identify and manage the risks and
exposures specified in the Guidelines. If the OTS determines
that a savings bank fails to meet any standard established by
the Guidelines, then the OTS may require the savings bank to
submit to the OTS an acceptable plan to achieve compliance. If a
savings bank fails to comply, the OTS may seek an enforcement
order in judicial proceedings and impose civil monetary
penalties.
Shared National Credit Program. The Shared
National Credit Program is an interagency program, established
in 1977, to provide a periodic credit risk assessment of the
largest and most complex syndicated loans held or agented by
financial institutions subject to supervision by a federal bank
regulatory agency. The Shared National Credit Program is
administered by the FRB, FDIC, OTS and the Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency. The Shared National Credit Program
covers any loan or loan commitment of at least $20 million
(i) which is shared under a formal lending agreement by
three or more unaffiliated financial institutions or (ii) a
portion of which is sold to two or more unaffiliated financial
institutions with the purchasing financial institutions assuming
their pro rata share of the credit risk. The Shared National
Credit Program is designed to provide uniformity and efficiency
in the federal banking agencies analysis and rating of the
largest and most complex credit facilities in the country by
avoiding duplicate credit reviews and ensuring consistency in
rating determinations. The federal banking agencies use a
combination of statistical and judgmental sampling techniques to
select borrowers for review each year. The selected borrowers
are reviewed and the credit quality rating assigned by the
applicable federal banking agencys examination team will
be reported to each financial institution that participates in
the loan as of the examination date. The assigned ratings are
used during examinations of the other financial institutions to
avoid duplicate reviews and ensure consistent treatment of these
loans. BankAtlantic has entered into participations with respect
to certain of its loans and has acquired participations in the
loans of other financial institutions which are subject to this
program and accordingly these loans may be subject to this
additional review.
Real Estate Lending Standards. The OTS and the
other federal banking agencies adopted regulations to prescribe
standards for extensions of credit that are secured by liens on
or interests in real estate or are made for the purpose of
financing the construction of improvements on real estate. The
OTS regulations require each savings bank to establish and
maintain written internal real estate lending standards that are
consistent with OTS guidelines and with safe and sound banking
practices and which are appropriate to the size of the savings
bank and the nature and scope of its real estate lending
activities.
Prompt Corrective Regulatory Action. Under the
OTS Prompt Corrective Action Regulations, the OTS is required to
take certain, and is authorized to take other, supervisory
actions against undercapitalized savings
129
banks, such as requiring compliance with a capital restoration
plan, restricting asset growth, acquisitions, branching and new
lines of business and, in extreme cases, appointment of a
receiver or conservator. The severity of the action required or
authorized to be taken increases as a savings banks
capital deteriorates. Savings banks are classified into five
categories of capitalization as well capitalized,
adequately capitalized,
undercapitalized, significantly
undercapitalized, and critically
undercapitalized. Generally, a savings bank is categorized
as well capitalized if:
|
|
|
|
|
its total capital is at least 10% of its risk-weighted assets;
|
|
|
|
its core capital is at least 6% of its risk-weighted assets;
|
|
|
|
its core capital is at least 5% of its adjusted total
assets; and
|
|
|
|
it is not subject to any written agreement, order, capital
directive or prompt corrective action directive issued by the
OTS, or certain regulations, to meet or maintain a specific
capital level for any capital measure.
|
The OTS categorized BankAtlantic as well capitalized
following its last examination. However, there is no assurance
that it will continue to be deemed well capitalized
even if current capital ratios are maintained in circumstances
where asset quality continues to deteriorate.
Insurance of Deposit Accounts. Savings banks
are subject to a risk-based assessment system for determining
the deposit insurance assessments to be paid by them.
Until December 31, 2006, the FDIC had assigned each savings
institution to one of three capital categories based on the
savings institutions financial information as of its most
recent quarterly financial report filed with the applicable bank
regulatory agency prior to the assessment period. The FDIC had
also assigned each savings institution to one of three
supervisory subcategories within each capital category based
upon a supervisory evaluation provided to the FDIC by the
savings institutions primary federal regulator and
information that the FDIC determined to be relevant to the
savings institutions financial condition and the risk
posed to the previously existing deposit insurance funds. A
savings institutions deposit insurance assessment rate
depended on the capital category and supervisory subcategory to
which it was assigned. Insurance assessment rates ranged from
0.00% of deposits for a savings institution in the highest
category (i.e., well capitalized and financially sound, with no
more than a few minor weaknesses) to 0.27% of deposits for a
savings institution in the lowest category (i.e.,
undercapitalized and substantial supervisory concern).
On January 1, 2007, the Federal Deposit Insurance Reform
Act of 2005, or the Reform Act, became effective. The Reform
Act, among other things, merged the Bank Insurance Fund and the
Savings Association Insurance Fund, both of which were
administered by the FDIC, into a new fund administered by the
FDIC known as the Deposit Insurance Fund, or DIF, and increased
the coverage limit for certain retirement plan deposits to
$250,000, but maintained the basic insurance coverage limit of
$100,000 for other depositors. On October 3, 2008, the
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, or the
Stabilization Act, temporarily raised the basic insurance
coverage limit to $250,000. The Stabilization Act provides that
the basic insurance limit will return to $100,000 after
December 31, 2009.
As a result of the Reform Act, the FDIC now assigns each savings
institution to one of four risk categories based upon the
savings institutions capital evaluation and supervisory
evaluation. The capital evaluation is based upon financial
information as of the savings institutions most recent
quarterly financial report filed with the applicable bank
regulatory agency at the end of each quarterly assessment
period. The supervisory evaluation is based upon the results of
examination findings by the savings institutions primary
federal regulator and information that the FDIC has determined
to be relevant to the savings institutions financial
condition and the risk posed to the DIF. A savings
institutions deposit insurance assessment rate depends on
the risk category to which it is assigned. For the quarter which
began January 1, 2009, insurance assessment rates range
from 12 cents per $100 in assessable deposits for a savings
institution in the least risk category (i.e., well capitalized
and financially sound with only a few minor weaknesses) to 50
cents per $100 in assessable deposits for a savings institution
in the most risk category (i.e., undercapitalized and poses a
substantial probability of loss to the DIF unless effective
corrective action is taken).
130
The FDIC is authorized to raise the assessment rates in certain
circumstances, which would affect savings institutions in all
risk categories. The FDIC has exercised this authority several
times in the past and could raise rates in the future. The FDIC
has proposed to adjust, and in certain instances increase,
insurance assessment rates for quarters beginning on or after
April 1, 2009 as well as impose a special assessment
payable September 30, 2009. While the special assessment is
under continued discussion, increases in deposit insurance
premiums would have an adverse effect on our earnings.
Privacy and Security Protection. BankAtlantic
is subject to the OTS regulations implementing the privacy and
security protection provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, or
GLBA. These regulations require a savings bank to disclose to
its customers and consumers its policy and practices with
respect to the privacy, and sharing with nonaffiliated third
parties, of its customers and consumers nonpublic
personal information. Additionally, in certain instances,
BankAtlantic is required to provide its customers and consumers
with the ability to opt-out of having BankAtlantic
share their nonpublic personal information with nonaffiliated
third parties. These regulations also require savings banks to
maintain policies and procedures to safeguard their customers
and consumers nonpublic personal information. BankAtlantic
has policies and procedures designed to comply with GLBA and
applicable privacy and security regulations.
Insurance Activities. BankAtlantic is
generally permitted to engage in certain insurance activities
through its subsidiaries. The OTS regulations implemented
pursuant to GLBA prohibit, among other things, depository
institutions from conditioning the extension of credit to
individuals upon either the purchase of an insurance product or
annuity or an agreement by the consumer not to purchase an
insurance product or annuity from an entity that is not
affiliated with the depository institution. The regulations also
require prior disclosure of this prohibition to potential
insurance product or annuity customers.
Federal Home Loan Bank System. BankAtlantic is
a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta, which is one
of the twelve regional FHLBs composing the FHLB system.
Each FHLB provides a central credit facility primarily for its
member institutions as well as other entities involved in home
mortgage lending. Any advances from a FHLB must be secured by
specified types of collateral, and all long-term advances may be
obtained only for the purpose of providing funds for residential
housing finance. As a member of the FHLB of Atlanta,
BankAtlantic is required to acquire and hold shares of capital
stock in the FHLB of Atlanta. BankAtlantic was in compliance
with this requirement with an investment in FHLB of Atlanta
stock at December 31, 2008 of approximately
$55 million. During the year ended December 31, 2008,
the FHLB of Atlanta paid dividends of approximately
$2.8 million on the capital stock held by BankAtlantic. If
dividends were reduced or interest on future FHLB advances
increased, BankAtlantics net interest income would likely
also be reduced. The FHLB did not pay a dividend during the
fourth quarter of 2008.
Federal Reserve System. BankAtlantic is
subject to provisions of the FRA and the FRBs regulations,
pursuant to which depository institutions may be required to
maintain non-interest-earning reserves against their deposit
accounts and certain other liabilities. Currently, federal
savings banks must maintain reserves against transaction
accounts (primarily NOW and regular interest and non-interest
bearing checking accounts). The FRB regulations establish the
specific rates of reserves that must be maintained, which are
subject to adjustment by the FRB. BankAtlantic is currently in
compliance with those reserve requirements. The required
reserves must be maintained in the form of vault cash, a
non-interest-bearing account at a Federal Reserve Bank, or a
pass-through account as defined by the FRB. The effect of this
reserve requirement is to reduce interest-earning assets. FHLB
system members are also authorized to borrow from the Federal
Reserve discount window, but FRB regulations require
such institutions to exhaust all FHLB sources before borrowing
from a Federal Reserve Bank.
Anti-Terrorism and Anti-Money Laundering
Regulations. The Uniting and Strengthening
America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and
Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001, or the USA PATRIOT Act, provides
the federal government with additional powers to address
terrorist threats through enhanced domestic security measures,
expanded surveillance powers, increased information sharing and
broadened anti-money laundering requirements. By way of
amendments to the Bank Secrecy Act, or BSA, the USA PATRIOT Act
puts in place measures intended to encourage information sharing
among bank regulatory and law
131
enforcement agencies. In addition, certain provisions of the USA
PATRIOT Act impose affirmative obligations on a broad range of
financial institutions, including savings banks.
Among other requirements, the USA PATRIOT Act and the related
OTS regulations require savings banks to establish anti-money
laundering programs that include, at a minimum:
|
|
|
|
|
internal policies, procedures and controls designed to implement
and maintain the savings banks compliance with all of the
requirements of the USA PATRIOT Act, the BSA and related laws
and regulations;
|
|
|
|
systems and procedures for monitoring and reporting of
suspicious transactions and activities;
|
|
|
|
a designated compliance officer;
|
|
|
|
employee training;
|
|
|
|
an independent audit function to test the anti-money laundering
program;
|
|
|
|
procedures to verify the identity of each customer upon the
opening of accounts; and
|
|
|
|
heightened due diligence policies, procedures and controls
applicable to certain foreign accounts and relationships.
|
Additionally, the USA PATRIOT Act requires each financial
institution to develop a customer identification program, or
CIP, as part of its anti-money laundering program. The key
components of the CIP are identification, verification,
government list comparison, notice and record retention. The
purpose of the CIP is to enable the financial institution to
determine the true identity and anticipated account activity of
each customer. To make this determination, among other things,
the financial institution must collect certain information from
customers at the time they enter into the customer relationship
with the financial institution. This information must be
verified within a reasonable time through documentary and
non-documentary methods. Furthermore, all customers must be
screened against any CIP-related government lists of known or
suspected terrorists.
Consumer Protection. BankAtlantic is subject
to federal and state consumer protection statutes and
regulations, including the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Fair
and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, the Equal Credit
Opportunity Act, the Fair Housing Act, the Truth in Lending Act,
the Truth in Savings Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures
Act and the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act. Among other things,
these acts:
|
|
|
|
|
require lenders to disclose credit terms in meaningful and
consistent ways;
|
|
|
|
require financial institutions to establish policies and
procedures regarding identity theft and notify customers of
certain information concerning their credit reporting;
|
|
|
|
prohibit discrimination against an applicant in any consumer or
business credit transaction;
|
|
|
|
prohibit discrimination in housing-related lending activities;
|
|
|
|
require certain lender banks to collect and report applicant and
borrower data regarding loans for home purchase or improvement
projects;
|
|
|
|
require lenders to provide borrowers with information regarding
the nature and cost of real estate settlements;
|
|
|
|
prohibit certain lending practices and limit escrow account
amounts with respect to real estate transactions; and
|
|
|
|
prescribe penalties for violations of the requirements of
consumer protection statutes and regulations.
|
132
Real
Estate Development Segments
BFCs Real Estate Development activities are comprised
of the operations of Woodbridge. For detailed information
regarding the business of Woodbridge and other information
relating to Woodbridge, see the section of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus captioned Information About
Woodbridge.
PROPERTIES
The principal and executive offices of BFC, BankAtlantic and
Woodbridge are located at 2100 West Cypress Creek Road,
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33309. In May 2008, BFC and BFC
Shared Service Corporation (BFC Shared Service), a
wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC, entered into office lease
agreements with BankAtlantic for office space in
BankAtlantics corporate headquarters which is owned by
BankAtlantic. Also, in May 2008, BFC entered into an office
sub-lease agreement with Woodbridge for office space in
BankAtlantics corporate headquarters.
The following table sets forth BankAtlantic owned and leased
stores by region at December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miami-
|
|
|
|
Palm
|
|
Tampa
|
|
|
Dade
|
|
Broward
|
|
Beach
|
|
Bay
|
|
Owned full-service stores
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Leased full-service stores
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Ground leased full-service stores(1)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total full-service stores
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease expiration dates
|
|
|
2009-2026
|
|
|
|
2009-2015
|
|
|
|
2011-2014
|
|
|
|
2009-2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ground lease expiration dates
|
|
|
2026-2027
|
|
|
|
2017-2072
|
|
|
|
2026
|
|
|
|
2026-2032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Stores in which BankAtlantic owns the building and leases the
land. |
The following table sets forth leased drive-through facilities,
leased back-office facilities and leased loan production offices
by region at December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miami-
|
|
|
|
Palm
|
|
Tampa
|
|
Orlando/
|
|
|
Dade
|
|
Broward
|
|
Beach
|
|
Bay
|
|
Jacksonville
|
|
Leased drive-through facilities
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased drive through expiration dates
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2011-2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased back-office facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased back-office expiration dates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009-2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased loan production facilities
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased loan production expiration dates
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008, BankAtlantic was seeking to sublease or
terminate eight operating leases and had executed two ground
leases for the construction of new stores. BankAtlantic also has
six parcels of land held for sale with an estimated market value
of $6.8 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miami-
|
|
|
|
Palm
|
|
Tampa
|
|
Orlando/
|
|
|
Dade
|
|
Broward
|
|
Beach
|
|
Bay
|
|
Jacksonville
|
|
Executed leases for new stores
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executed lease expiration dates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2030
|
|
|
|
2029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executed leases held for sublease
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executed lease expiration dates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-2048
|
|
|
|
2028-2029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133
Woodbridge owns an office building located at 2200 West
Cypress Creek Road, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309. Two
floors of this office building are currently leased to a third
party and Woodbridge will continue to seek to lease the
remaining space available at this office building including to
affiliates. Core Communities owns its executive office building
in Port St. Lucie, Florida. Woodbridge also has various
month-to-month leases on the trailers occupied by it in
Tradition Hilton Head. In addition to Woodbridges
properties used for offices, Woodbridge additionally owns
commercial space in Florida that is leased to third parties.
Because of the nature of Woodbridges real estate
operations, significant amounts of property are held as
inventory and property and equipment in the ordinary course of
Woodbridges business.
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
Lashelle Farrington, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, v. BankAtlantic, a Federal Savings
Bank, BA Financial Services, LLC, a Florida limited liability
corporation, BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc., a Florida corporation,
BFC Financial Corporation, a Florida corporation, and Does 1-10,
Case
No. 09-006210
(11), in the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit
in and for Broward County, Florida
On February 2, 2009, Lashelle Farington filed a purported
class action for state common law breach of contract and unjust
enrichment against BankAtlantic, several of its affiliates, and
various unnamed officers and agents. Specifically, the Complaint
alleges that BankAtlantic breached its Personal Account
Depositors Agreement by charging overdraft fees for
certain debit card purchases which allegedly did not cause the
customers accounts to be overdrawn at time that they were
paid. The Complaint alleges that rather than following the
applicable provisions of the agreement, BankAtlantic charged
overdraft fees for debit card purchases which occurred before
the customers account was actually overdrawn.
On the breach of contract claim, the Plaintiff seeks to
establish a class comprised of all persons or entities with
BankAtlantic checking accounts who incurred these allegedly
improper overdraft fees on debit card transactions within the
previous 5 years. On the unjust enrichment claim, the
purported class is the same except that the class period is
within the previous 4 years. The Complaint does not allege
any specific amount in controversy.
This case is in the initial stages and BankAtlantic has not yet
filed any responsive pleadings. BankAtlantic believes the claims
to be without merit and intends to vigorously defend the actions.
Joseph C. Hubbard, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, vs. BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc., James A.
White, Valerie C. Toalson, Jarett S. Levan, and Alan B.
Levan,
No. 0:07-cv-61542-UU,
United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
On October 29, 2007, Joseph C. Hubbard filed a purported
class action in the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Florida against BankAtlantic Bancorp and
four of its current or former officers. The Complaint, which was
later amended on June 12, 2008, alleges that during the
purported class period of November 9, 2005 through
October 25, 2007, BankAtlantic Bancorp and the named
officers knowingly
and/or
recklessly made misrepresentations of material fact regarding
BankAtlantic and specifically BankAtlantics loan portfolio
and allowance for loan losses. The Complaint seeks to assert
claims for violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
Rule 10b-5
promulgated thereunder and seeks unspecified damages. On
December 12, 2007, the Court consolidated into Hubbard
a separately filed action captioned Alarm Specialties,
Inc. v. BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc.,
No. 0:07 cv-61623-WPD that attempted to assert
similar claims on behalf of the same class. On February 5,
2008, the Court appointed State-Boston Retirement System lead
plaintiff and Lubaton Sucharow LLP to serve as lead counsel
pursuant to the provisions of the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act. BankAtlantic Bancorp believes the claims to be
without merit and intends to vigorously defend the actions.
134
D.W. Hugo, individually and on behalf of Nominal Defendant
BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. vs. BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc., Alan
B. Levan, Jarett S. Levan, Jay C. McClung, Marcia K. Snyder,
Valerie Toalson, James A. White, John E. Abdo, D. Keith Cobb,
Steven M. Coldren, and David A. Lieberman, Case
No. 0:08-cv-61018-UU,
United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
On July 2, 2008, D.W. Hugo filed a purported class action,
which was brought as a derivative action on behalf of
BankAtlantic Bancorp pursuant to Florida laws, in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of Florida
against BankAtlantic Bancorp and the above listed officers and
directors. The Complaint alleges that the individual defendants
breached their fiduciary duties by engaging in certain lending
practices with respect to BankAtlantics Commercial Real
Estate Loan Portfolio. The Complaint further alleges that
BankAtlantic Bancorps public filings and statements did
not fully disclose the risks associated with the Commercial Real
Estate Loan Portfolio and seeks damages on behalf of
BankAtlantic Bancorp. On December 2, 2008, the Circuit
Court for Broward County stayed a separately filed action
captioned Albert R. Feldman, Derivatively on behalf of
Nominal Defendant BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. vs. Alan B. Levan,
et al., Case No. 0846795 07, which attempted to assert
substantially the same allegations as in the Hugo matter,
but with somewhat different state law causes of action. The
Court granted the motion to stay the action pending further
order of the court and allowing any party to move for relief
from the stay, provided the moving party gives at least thirty
days written notice to all of the non-moving parties. On
July 1, 2009, the parties in the Hugo action reached
a settlement, subject to approval by the Court and the required
notice to BankAtlantic Bancorps shareholders. The proposed
settlement provides for an exchange of mutual releases and a
dismissal with prejudice of all claims against all Defendants.
There is no additional consideration, monetary or otherwise, for
the settlement. On July 8, 2009, Albert R. Feldman filed a
motion to intervene in the Hugo action for the limited
purpose of staying the Hugo action in favor of the
prosecution of his pending state court action. On July 27,
2009, Plaintiff D.W. Hugo and Defendants filed separate
oppositions to the motion to intervene. The motion to intervene
remains pending before the Court. BankAtlantic Bancorp believes
the claims to be without merit and intends to vigorously defend
the actions.
Wilmine Almonor, individually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated, vs. BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc., Steven M.
Coldren, Mary E. Ginestra, Willis N. Holcombe, Jarett S. Levan,
John E. Abdo, David A. Lieberman, Charlie C. Winningham II, D.
Keith Cobb, Bruno L. DiGiulian, Alan B. Levan, James A. White,
the Security Plus Plan Committee, and Unknown Fiduciary
Defendants 1-50,
No. 0:07-cv-61862-DMM,
United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
On December 20, 2007, Wilmine Almonor filed a purported
class action in the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Florida against BankAtlantic Bancorp and
the above-listed officers, directors, employees, and
organizations. The Complaint alleges that during the purported
class period of November 9, 2005 to present, BankAtlantic
Bancorp and the individual defendants violated the Employment
Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) by permitting
company employees to choose to invest in BankAtlantic
Bancorps Class A common stock in light of the facts
alleged in the Hubbard securities lawsuit. The Complaint
seeks to assert claims for breach of fiduciary duties, the duty
to provide accurate information, the duty to avoid conflicts of
interest under ERISA and seeks unspecified damages. On
February 18, 2009, the Plaintiff filed a Second Amended
Complaint, making substantially the same allegations and
asserting the same claims for relief. On July 14, 2009, the
Court granted in-part Defendants motion to dismiss
the Second Amended Complaint, dismissing the following
individual Defendants from Count II: Lewis Sarrica, Susan
McGregor, Patricia Lefebvre, Jeffrey Mindling and Gerry
Lachnicht. On July 28, 2009, the Court denied
Plaintiffs motion for class certification. BankAtlantic
Bancorp believes the claims to be without merit and intends to
vigorously defend the actions.
Dixon v. Vesta Holdings I, LLC. et al, Fulton
County Superior Court, Civil Case No. 2007 CV 143456
The Plaintiff brought this action individually and on
behalf of all others situated against Vesta
Holdings I, LLC as Nominee for Heartwood 11, LLC and
others. Heartwood 11, LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of
BankAtlantic. The Plaintiff seeks compensatory, injunctive and
punitive relief based on alleged improper acquisition of
property tax liens issued for unpaid taxes as well as the
subsequent foreclosures and sales of the subject properties to
third parties. The case is in its early stages and management is
analyzing the matter.
135
Securities
and Exchange Commission Subpoena
In October 2008, BankAtlantic Bancorp received a subpoena and
notice of investigation by the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Miami Regional Office. The subpoena requests a broad
range of documents relating to, among other matters, recent and
pending litigation to which BankAtlantic Bancorp is or was a
party, certain of BankAtlantics non-performing,
non-accrual and charged-off loans, BankAtlantic Bancorps
cost saving measures, BankAtlantic Bancorps recently
formed asset workout subsidiary and any purchases or sale of
BankAtlantic Bancorps common stock by officers or
directors of BankAtlantic Bancorp. BankAtlantic Bancorp intends
to fully cooperate and provide the requested documentation.
For information concerning Woodbridges legal
proceedings, see the section of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus captioned Information About
Woodbridge Legal Proceedings.
MARKET
FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Class A
Common Stock Market Information
For market information with respect to BFCs Class A
Common Stock, including the high and low sales prices for each
quarter since the beginning of 2007, see the section of this
joint proxy statement/prospectus above captioned
Comparative Stock Prices and Dividends.
Class B
Common Stock Market Information
BFCs Class B Common Stock is quoted on the OTC
Bulletin Board under the symbol BFCFB.OB. The
following table sets forth, for the indicated periods, the high
and low trading prices for BFCs Class B Common Stock
as reported by the National Association of Securities Dealers
Automated Quotation System. The over-the-counter stock prices do
not include retail
mark-ups,
mark-downs or commissions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
6.10
|
|
|
$
|
5.00
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
4.65
|
|
|
|
3.60
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
3.00
|
|
|
|
1.10
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
1.50
|
|
|
$
|
1.08
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
.65
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
.75
|
|
|
|
.52
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
.55
|
|
|
|
.25
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
.25
|
|
|
$
|
.25
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
.51
|
|
|
|
.25
|
|
Third Quarter (through August 12, 2009)
|
|
|
.40
|
|
|
|
.40
|
|
Holders
As of August 3, 2009, there were approximately 2,709 record
holders of BFCs Class A Common Stock and
approximately 715 record holders of BFCs Class B
Common Stock.
Dividends
For information with respect to the payment of dividends on
BFCs Class A Common Stock, see the section of this
joint proxy statement/prospectus above captioned
Comparative Stock Prices and Dividends.
136
There are restrictions on the payment of dividends by
BankAtlantic to BankAtlantic Bancorp and in certain
circumstances on the payment of dividends by BankAtlantic
Bancorp to holders of its common stock, including BFC. In
February 2009, BankAtlantic Bancorp elected to exercise its
right to defer payments of interest on its outstanding junior
subordinated debt associated with its trust preferred
securities. BankAtlantic Bancorp is permitted to defer quarterly
interest payments for up to 20 consecutive quarters. During the
deferral period, BankAtlantic Bancorp will not pay dividends to
its common shareholders, including BFC. BankAtlantic Bancorp can
end the deferral period at any time. The availability of funds
for dividend payments by BankAtlantic Bancorp depends upon
BankAtlantics ability to pay dividends to BankAtlantic
Bancorp. Current regulations applicable to the payment of cash
dividends by savings institutions impose limits on capital
distributions based on an institutions regulatory capital
levels, retained net income and net income. BankAtlantic Bancorp
does not expect to receive dividend payments from BankAtlantic
due to BankAtlantics recent net losses. Therefore, BFC
does not expect to receive dividend payments from BankAtlantic
Bancorp.
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The following table lists all securities authorized for issuance
and outstanding under the Companys equity compensation
plans at December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available for
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities to
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
|
|
|
Future Issuance Under
|
|
|
|
be Issued Upon Exercise
|
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
|
Equity Compensation Plans
|
|
|
|
of Outstanding Options
|
|
|
Outstanding Options
|
|
|
(Excluding Outstanding
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
Warrants or Rights
|
|
|
Warrants or Rights
|
|
|
Options)
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
1,797,960
|
|
|
$
|
4.57
|
|
|
|
2,015,804
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,797,960
|
|
|
$
|
4.57
|
|
|
|
2,015,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At the annual meeting of BFCs shareholders held on
May 19, 2009, BFCs shareholders approved an amendment
to BFCs 2005 Stock Incentive Plan which, among other
things, increased the aggregate number of shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock available for grant under the plan from
3,000,000 shares to 6,000,000 shares. As a result of
the amendment, 4,858,250 shares of BFCs Class A
Common Stock remain available for future issuance under the
Companys 2005 Stock Incentive Plan.
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
BFC
Market risk is defined as the risk of loss arising from adverse
changes in market valuations that arise from interest rate risk,
foreign currency exchange rate risk, commodity price risk and
equity price risk. BFCs primary market risk is equity
price risk.
Because BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge are consolidated in
BFCs financial statements, a significant change in the
market price of their stock would not directly impact BFCs
financial results, but would likely have an effect on the market
price of its common stock. The market price of BFCs common
stock and the market prices of BankAtlantic Bancorps and
Woodbridges common stock are important to the valuation
and financing capability of BFC. BFC also owns
800,000 shares of Benihanas Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock for which no market is available. The ability to
realize or liquidate this investment will depend on future
market and economic conditions and the ability to register the
shares of Benihanas Common Stock in the event that
BFCs investment in Benihanas Series B
Convertible Preferred stock is converted, all of which are
subject to significant risk. At June 30, 2009, the closing
price of Benihanas Common Stock was $7.05 per share. The
market value of Benihanas Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock if converted at June 30, 2009 would have
been approximately $11.1 million.
137
During the quarter ended December 31, 2008, BFC performed
an impairment review of its investment in Benihanas
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock to determine if an
impairment adjustment was needed. Based on the evaluation and
the review of various qualitative and quantitative factors,
including the decline in the underlying trading value of
Benihanas Common Stock and the redemption provisions of
Benihanas Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, BFC
determined that there was an other-than-temporary decline of
approximately $3.6 million and, accordingly, the investment
was written down to its fair value of approximately
$16.4 million. At June 30, 2009, the fair value of
BFCs investment in Benihanas Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock was approximately
$20.5 million, which includes gross unrealized gains of
approximately $4.1 million.
BankAtlantic
Bancorp
The majority of BankAtlantics assets and liabilities are
monetary in nature. As a result, the earnings and growth of
BankAtlantic are significantly affected by interest rates, which
are subject to the influence of economic conditions generally,
both domestic and foreign, and also to the monetary and fiscal
policies of the United States and its agencies, particularly the
Federal Reserve Board. The nature and timing of any changes in
such policies or general economic conditions and their effect on
BankAtlantic are unpredictable. Changes in interest rates can
impact BankAtlantics net interest income as well as the
valuation of its assets and liabilities. BankAtlantics
interest rate risk position at December 31, 2008 is
discussed below. BankAtlantics interest rate risk position
did not significantly change during the six months ended
June 30, 2009.
The amount of BankAtlantics interest earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities expected to reprice, prepay or
mature in each of the indicated periods was as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic Repricing Gap Table
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
3 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Less
|
|
|
or Less
|
|
|
or Less
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Interest earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential loans(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate
|
|
$
|
221,281
|
|
|
|
127,914
|
|
|
|
65,996
|
|
|
|
236,071
|
|
|
|
651,262
|
|
Hybrids ARM less than 5 years
|
|
|
64,444
|
|
|
|
40,703
|
|
|
|
6,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,265
|
|
Hybrids ARM more than 5 years
|
|
|
441,458
|
|
|
|
274,155
|
|
|
|
201,044
|
|
|
|
261,715
|
|
|
|
1,178,372
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
989,437
|
|
|
|
138,406
|
|
|
|
110,131
|
|
|
|
130,512
|
|
|
|
1,368,486
|
|
Small business loans
|
|
|
207,950
|
|
|
|
83,499
|
|
|
|
26,676
|
|
|
|
8,155
|
|
|
|
326,280
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
712,714
|
|
|
|
7,578
|
|
|
|
4,626
|
|
|
|
21,730
|
|
|
|
746,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
2,637,284
|
|
|
|
672,255
|
|
|
|
414,591
|
|
|
|
658,183
|
|
|
|
4,382,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage backed securities
|
|
|
210,711
|
|
|
|
133,679
|
|
|
|
79,576
|
|
|
|
263,626
|
|
|
|
687,592
|
|
Taxable investment securities
|
|
|
75,412
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,761
|
|
|
|
88,423
|
|
Tax certificates
|
|
|
213,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
|
|
|
499,657
|
|
|
|
133,929
|
|
|
|
79,576
|
|
|
|
276,387
|
|
|
|
989,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest earning assets
|
|
|
3,136,941
|
|
|
|
806,184
|
|
|
|
494,167
|
|
|
|
934,570
|
|
|
|
5,371,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-earning assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
341,828
|
|
|
|
341,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,136,941
|
|
|
|
806,184
|
|
|
|
494,167
|
|
|
|
1,276,398
|
|
|
|
5,713,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest bearing liabilities
|
|
$
|
2,949,420
|
|
|
|
658,713
|
|
|
|
243,834
|
|
|
|
1,368,893
|
|
|
|
5,220,860
|
|
Non-interest bearing liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
492,830
|
|
|
|
492,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest bearing liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
2,949,420
|
|
|
|
658,713
|
|
|
|
243,834
|
|
|
|
1,861,723
|
|
|
|
5,713,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAP (repricing difference)
|
|
$
|
187,521
|
|
|
|
147,471
|
|
|
|
250,333
|
|
|
|
(434,323
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative GAP
|
|
$
|
187,521
|
|
|
|
334,992
|
|
|
|
585,325
|
|
|
|
151,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repricing Percentage
|
|
|
3.28
|
%
|
|
|
2.58
|
%
|
|
|
4.38
|
%
|
|
|
(7.60
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Percentage
|
|
|
3.28
|
%
|
|
|
5.86
|
%
|
|
|
10.24
|
%
|
|
|
2.64
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Hybrid adjustable rate mortgages (ARM) earn fixed rates for
designated periods and adjust annually thereafter based on the
one year U.S. Treasury note rate. |
138
BankAtlantics residential loan portfolio includes
$979.6 million of interest-only loans. These loans are
scheduled to reprice as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31,
|
|
Amount(1)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
44,835
|
|
2010
|
|
|
41,413
|
|
2011
|
|
|
85,408
|
|
2012
|
|
|
81,191
|
|
2013
|
|
|
163,330
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
563,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest only loans
|
|
$
|
979,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The above table assumes no prepayments. |
The majority of BankAtlantics assets and liabilities are
monetary in nature, subjecting BankAtlantic to significant
interest rate risk because its assets and liabilities reprice at
different times, market interest rates change differently among
each rate indices and certain interest earning assets, primarily
residential loans, may be prepaid before maturity as interest
rates change.
BankAtlantic has developed a model using standard industry
software to measure its interest rate risk. The model performs a
sensitivity analysis that measures the effect on its net
interest income of changes in interest rates. The model measures
the impact that parallel interest rate shifts of 100 and
200 basis points would have on net interest income over a
12 month period.
The model calculates the change in net interest income by:
i. Calculating interest income and interest expense from
existing assets and liabilities using current repricing,
prepayment and volume assumptions;
ii. Estimating the change in expected net interest income
based on instantaneous and parallel shifts in the yield curve to
determine the effect on net interest income; and
iii. Calculating the percentage change in net interest
income calculated in (i) and (ii).
Management of BankAtlantic has made estimates of cash flow,
prepayment, repricing and volume assumptions that it believes to
be reasonable. Actual results will differ from the simulated
results due to changes in interest rates that differ from the
assumptions in the simulation model.
In assessing the interest rate risk during 2008 certain
assumptions were utilized in preparing the following table.
These assumptions related to:
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rates,
|
|
|
|
Loan prepayment rates,
|
|
|
|
Deposit decay rates,
|
|
|
|
Re-pricing of certain borrowings, and
|
|
|
|
Reinvestment in earning assets.
|
The prepayment assumptions used in the model were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate mortgages
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate securities
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax certificates
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustable rate mortgages
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustable rate securities
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
139
Deposit runoff assumptions used in the model are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within
|
|
1-3
|
|
3-5
|
|
Over 5
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
Years
|
|
Years
|
|
Years
|
|
Money fund savings accounts decay rates
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
NOW and savings accounts decay rates
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
Presented below is an analysis of BankAtlantics estimated
net interest income over a twelve month period calculated
utilizing its model (dollars are in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Changes
|
|
Interest
|
|
Percent
|
in Rate
|
|
Income
|
|
Change
|
|
+200 bp
|
|
$
|
191,139
|
|
|
|
(3.99
|
)%
|
+100 bp
|
|
|
198,441
|
|
|
|
(0.32
|
)%
|
0
|
|
|
199,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
−100 bp
|
|
|
196,893
|
|
|
|
(1.10
|
)%
|
−200 bp
|
|
|
193,138
|
|
|
|
(2.99
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Changes
|
|
Interest
|
|
Percent
|
in Rate
|
|
Income
|
|
Change
|
|
+200 bp
|
|
$
|
187,031
|
|
|
|
(7.96
|
)%
|
+100 bp
|
|
|
198,147
|
|
|
|
(2.38
|
)%
|
0
|
|
|
202,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
−100 bp
|
|
|
203,331
|
|
|
|
0.23
|
%
|
−200 bp
|
|
|
204,354
|
|
|
|
0.74
|
%
|
BankAtlantic Bancorp has $294.2 million of outstanding
junior subordinated debentures of which $237.1 million bear
interest at variable interest rates and adjust quarterly and
$57.1 million bear interest at an 8.5% fixed rate. As of
December 31, 2008, $263.2 million of the junior
subordinated debentures are callable and $30.9 million are
callable in 2012.
Woodbridge
For information concerning Woodbridges market risk, see
the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus below
entitled Information About Woodbridge
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
MANAGEMENT
Board
of Directors
Current
Members of the Board of Directors
Alan B. Levan, age 64, formed the I.R.E. Group
(predecessor to BFC) in 1972. Since 1978, he has been Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer of BFC or its
predecessors. He has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
of BankAtlantic Bancorp since 1994 and Chairman of BankAtlantic
since 1987. He has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Woodbridge since 1985 and Chairman of Bluegreen since 2002.
Since June 2009, he has also served as a director of Benihana.
Alan B. Levan is the father of Jarett S. Levan, who, as
described below, is anticipated to be appointed to the board of
directors of BFC in connection with the merger.
John E. Abdo, age 66, has been a director of BFC
since 1988 and Vice Chairman of BFC since 1993. He has been Vice
Chairman of BankAtlantic since April 1987 and Chairman of the
Executive Committee of BankAtlantic since October 1985. He has
been a director and Vice Chairman of BankAtlantic Bancorp since
1994 and Vice Chairman of Woodbridge since April 2001. He is
also Vice Chairman of Benihana, and has
140
been a director and Vice Chairman of Bluegreen since 2002. He is
also a member of the board of directors of the Broward
Performing Arts Center Authority (PACA), and he is the former
President and a current member of the board of directors of the
Broward Performing Arts Foundation.
D. Keith Cobb, age 68, has been a director of
BFC since 2004. Mr. Cobb has served as a business
consultant and strategic advisor to a number of companies since
1996. In addition, Mr. Cobb completed a six-year term on
the board of the Federal Reserve Bank of Miami in 2002.
Mr. Cobb spent thirty-two years as a practicing certified
public accountant at KPMG LLP, and was Vice Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Alamo Rent A Car, Inc. from 1995 until its
sale in 1996. Mr. Cobb also serves on the boards of
directors of BankAtlantic Bancorp and Alliance Data Systems
Corporation.
Oscar Holzmann, age 66, has been a director of BFC
since 2002. Mr. Holzmann has been an Associate Professor of
Accounting at the University of Miami since 1980. He received
his Ph.D. in Business Administration from Pennsylvania State
University in 1974.
Neil Sterling, age 58, has been a director of BFC
since 2003. Mr. Sterling has been the principal of The
Sterling Resources Group, Inc., a business
development-consulting firm in Fort Lauderdale, Florida,
since 1998.
Director
Independence
The board of directors of BFC has affirmatively determined that
D. Keith Cobb, Oscar Holzmann and Neil Sterling, who together
comprise a majority of the board of directors of BFC, are
independent as such term is defined in the listing
standards of the NYSE Arca, Inc. (which listing standards the
board of directors of BFC adopted in making its independence
determinations with respect to each of its members) and
applicable law relating to the independence of directors.
Members
of the Board of Directors Following the Merger
In connection with the merger, the board of directors of BFC
will be expanded from five to fourteen members and will consist
of (i) the five current members of the board of directors
of BFC named above, (ii) Messrs. James Blosser, Darwin
Dornbush, S. Lawrence Kahn, III, Alan J. Levy, Joel Levy,
William Nicholson and William Scherer, the seven current
directors of Woodbridge who do not currently serve as directors
of BFC, (iii) Seth M. Wise, the President of Woodbridge,
and (iv) Jarett S. Levan, the President of BankAtlantic
Bancorp and Chief Executive Officer and President of
BankAtlantic.
Jarett S. Levan, age 35, is the President of
BankAtlantic Bancorp and the Chief Executive Officer and
President of BankAtlantic and has served in various capacities
at BankAtlantic, including as Executive Vice President and Chief
Marketing Officer; President, Alternative Delivery; President,
BankAtlantic.com; and Manager of Investor Relations. He joined
BankAtlantic as an attorney in the Legal Department in January
1998. He has also served as a director of BankAtlantic Bancorp
since 1999. Jarett S. Levan is the son of Alan B. Levan.
A summary of the background and experience of each of the seven
current Woodbridge directors to be appointed to the board of
directors of BFC in connection with the merger is set forth
under Information About Woodbridge
Management Board of Directors. A summary of
the background and experience of Mr. Wise is set forth
under Information About Woodbridge
Management Executive Officers.
Executive
Officers
Current
Executive Officers
The following individuals currently serve as executive officers
of BFC:
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Position
|
|
Alan B. Levan
|
|
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
|
John E. Abdo
|
|
Vice Chairman
|
John K. Grelle
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Maria R. Scheker
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer
|
141
All officers serve until they resign or are replaced or removed
by BFCs board of directors.
The following additional information is provided for the
executive officers shown above who are not also directors of BFC:
John K. Grelle, age 65, joined BFC as acting Chief
Financial Officer on January 11, 2008 and was appointed
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of BFC on
May 20, 2008. Mr. Grelle was also appointed Executive
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and principal accounting
officer of Woodbridge on May 20, 2008. Mr. Grelle
previously served as a Partner of Tatum, LLC, an executive
services firm. From 2003 through October 2007, when
Mr. Grelle joined Tatum, LLC, Mr. Grelle was the
founder and principal of a business formation and strategic
development consulting firm. From 1996 through 2003,
Mr. Grelle served as Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of ULLICO Inc. and, from 1993 through 1995, he
served as Managing Director of DCG Consulting. Mr. Grelle
has also been employed in various other executive and financial
positions throughout his career, including Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Old American Insurance Company, Controller
of the financial services division of American Can Company
(later known as Primerica), Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer of National Benefit Life, a subsidiary of
Primerica, President of Bell National Life, Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of American Health and
Life, Controller of Sun Life America and Director of Strategic
Planning and Budgeting for ITT Hamilton Life. Mr. Grelle is
a former member of the board of directors of the N.Y. Council of
Life Insurers.
Maria R. Scheker, age 51, was appointed Chief
Accounting Officer of BFC in April 2007. Ms. Scheker joined
BFC in 1985 and has held various positions with BFC during this
time, including Assistant Controller from 1993 through 2003.
Ms. Scheker was appointed Controller of BFC in 2003 and
Senior Vice President of BFC in March 2006. Ms. Scheker has
been a certified public accountant in the State of Florida since
2003.
Executive
Officers Following the Merger
Upon the completion of the merger, the executive officers of BFC
in office immediately prior to the effective time of the merger,
who BFC expects will be those executive officers named above,
will be the executive officers of BFC. In addition, Seth M.
Wise, the President of Woodbridge, will serve as Executive Vice
President of BFC effective upon consummation of the merger. A
summary of the background and experience of Mr. Wise is set
forth under Information About Woodbridge
Management Executive Officers.
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
BFC may be deemed to be the controlling shareholder of
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge by virtue of its ownership
of shares representing 59% of the total voting power of each
such company. BFC also has a direct non-controlling interest in
Benihana and, through Woodbridge, an approximately 31% indirect
ownership interest in Bluegreen. BFC may be deemed to be
controlled by Alan B. Levan and John E. Abdo, BFCs
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President and
BFCs Vice Chairman, respectively, who collectively may be
deemed to beneficially own shares of BFCs Class A
Common Stock and Class B Common Stock representing 74.2% of
BFCs total voting power. See the section of this joint
proxy statement/prospectus entitled Security Ownership of
Certain Beneficial Owners and Management BFC
below for further information with respect to the share
ownership of each of Messrs. Levan and Abdo.
Messrs. Levan and Abdo are each executive officers and
directors of BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge and directors
of Bluegreen and Benihana.
142
The following table presents BFC, BankAtlantic Bancorp,
Woodbridge and Bluegreen related party transactions incurred at,
and for the years ended, December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At and for the Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BFC
|
|
Bancorp
|
|
Woodbridge
|
|
Bluegreen
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Shared service receivable (payable)
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
$
|
398
|
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
Shared service income (expense)
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,157
|
|
|
|
(1,593
|
)
|
|
|
(1,135
|
)
|
|
|
(429
|
)
|
Facilities cost
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
$
|
(245
|
)
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
75
|
|
Interest income (expense) from cash balance/securities sold
under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
(b
|
)
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents and (securities sold under agreements
to repurchase)
|
|
|
(b
|
)
|
|
$
|
263
|
|
|
|
(4,696
|
)
|
|
|
4,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At and for the Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BFC
|
|
Bancorp
|
|
Woodbridge
|
|
Bluegreen
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Shared service receivable (payable)
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
$
|
312
|
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
Shared service income (expense)
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,855
|
|
|
|
(1,406
|
)
|
|
|
(1,006
|
)
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
Facilities cost
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
$
|
(272
|
)
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Interest income (expense) from cash balance/securities sold
under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
(b
|
)
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents and (securities sold under agreements
to repurchase)
|
|
|
(b
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,217
|
|
|
|
(7,335
|
)
|
|
|
6,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At and for the Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BFC
|
|
Bancorp
|
|
Woodbridge
|
|
Bluegreen
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents and (securities sold under agreements
to repurchase)
|
|
|
(b
|
)
|
|
$
|
996
|
|
|
|
(5,547
|
)
|
|
|
4,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shared service receivable (payable)
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
$
|
312
|
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
Shared service income (expense)
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,035
|
|
|
|
(647
|
)
|
|
|
(1,134
|
)
|
|
|
(254
|
)
|
Interest income (expense) from cash balance/securities sold
under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
(b
|
)
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
|
(479
|
)
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Pursuant to the terms of shared service agreements between BFC,
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge, subsidiaries of BFC provide
shared service operations in the areas of human resources, risk
management, investor relations, executive office administration
and other services to BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge.
Additionally, BFC provides certain risk management and
administrative services to Bluegreen. The costs of shared
services are allocated based upon the usage of the respective
services. Also, as part of the shared service arrangement, BFC
pays BankAtlantic Bancorp and Bluegreen for office facilities
costs relating to BFC and its shared service operations. |
|
|
|
In May 2008, BFC and BFC Shared Service Corporation (BFC
Shared Service), a wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC, entered
into office lease agreements with BankAtlantic under which BFC
and BFC Shared Service agreed to pay BankAtlantic an annual rent
of approximately $294,000 for office space in
BankAtlantics corporate headquarters. In May 2008, BFC
also entered into an office sub-lease agreement with Woodbridge
for office space in BankAtlantics corporate headquarters
pursuant to which Woodbridge agreed to pay BFC an annual rent of
approximately $152,000, subject to annual 3% increases. |
143
|
|
|
(b) |
|
BFC and Woodbridge entered into securities sold under agreements
to repurchase transactions with BankAtlantic in the aggregate of
approximately $4.7 million, $7.3 million and
$5.5 million at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. Interest recognized in connection with these
transactions was approximately $80,000, $185,000 and $479,000
for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. These transactions have similar terms as
BankAtlantics agreements with unaffiliated parties.
Additionally, at December 31, 2008, BankAtlantic
facilitated the placement of $49.9 million of certificates
of deposits insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(the FDIC) with other insured depository
institutions on Woodbridges behalf through the Certificate
of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS) program.
The CDARS program facilitates the placement of funds into
certificates of deposits issued by other financial institutions
in increments of less than the standard FDIC insurance maximum
to insure that both principal and interest are eligible for full
FDIC insurance coverage. |
In March 2008, BankAtlantic entered into an agreement with
Woodbridge to provide information technology support to
Woodbridge at an initial cost of $10,000 per month and a
one-time
set-up
charge of $17,000. During the year ended December 31, 2008,
Woodbridge paid BankAtlantic the one-time set up charge of
$17,000 and hosting fees of approximately $73,000, as well as
fees of approximately $23,000 for other information technology
services provided by BankAtlantic. Effective April 1, 2009,
the monthly hosting fees increased to $15,000.
BankAtlantic Bancorp in prior periods issued options to acquire
shares of BankAtlantic Bancorps Class A Common Stock
to employees of Woodbridge prior to the spin-off of Woodbridge
by BankAtlantic Bancorp. Additionally, employees of BankAtlantic
Bancorp have transferred to affiliate companies and BankAtlantic
Bancorp has elected, in accordance with the terms of
BankAtlantic Bancorps stock option plans, not to cancel
the stock options held by those former employees. BankAtlantic
Bancorp accounts for these options to former employees as
employee stock options because these individuals were employees
of BankAtlantic Bancorp on the grant date. During the years
ended December 31, 2006 and 2007, former employees
exercised options to acquire 10,293 shares and
2,613 shares, respectively, of BankAtlantic Bancorps
Class A Common Stock at a weighted average exercise price
of $16.40 and $42.80, respectively. There were no options
exercised by former employees during the year ended
December 31, 2008.
BankAtlantic Bancorps options outstanding to former
employees consisted of the following as of December 31,
2006, 2007 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006
|
|
As of December 31, 2007
|
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
BankAtlantic
|
|
Weighted
|
|
BankAtlantic
|
|
Weighted
|
|
BankAtlantic
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Bancorps Class A
|
|
Average
|
|
Bancorps Class A
|
|
Average
|
|
Bancorps Class A
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Options outstanding
|
|
|
61,320
|
|
|
$
|
52.40
|
|
|
|
53,789
|
|
|
$
|
49.50
|
|
|
|
53,789
|
|
|
$
|
48.46
|
|
Options non-vested
|
|
|
49,029
|
|
|
$
|
56.95
|
|
|
|
30,917
|
|
|
$
|
61.60
|
|
|
|
13,610
|
|
|
$
|
92.85
|
|
During the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007,
BankAtlantic Bancorp issued to BFC employees that performed
services for BankAtlantic Bancorp options to acquire
10,060 shares and 9,800 shares, respectively, of
BankAtlantic Bancorps Class A Common Stock at an
exercise price of $73.45 and $46.90, respectively. These options
vest in five years and expire ten years from the grant date.
BankAtlantic Bancorp recorded $26,000, $13,000 and $26,000 of
service provider expense for the years ended December 31,
2006, 2007 and 2008, respectively.
BFC and its subsidiaries, including BankAtlantic Bancorp,
utilized certain services of Ruden, McClosky, Smith,
Schuster & Russell, P.A. (Ruden,
McClosky). Bruno DiGiulian, a director of BankAtlantic
Bancorp, was of counsel at Ruden, McClosky prior to his
retirement in 2006. Fees aggregating $75,000, $274,000 and
$526,000 were paid by BankAtlantic Bancorp to Ruden, McClosky
during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Levitt and Sons, a former wholly-owned subsidiary of Woodbridge,
utilized the services of Conrad & Scherer, P.A., a law
firm in which William R. Scherer, a member of Woodbridges
Board of Directors, is a member, and paid fees aggregating
$22,000 and $470,000 to this firm during the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
144
Woodbridge is currently working with Bluegreen to explore
avenues for assisting Bluegreen in obtaining liquidity for its
receivables, which may include, among other potential
alternatives, Woodbridge forming a broker dealer to raise
capital through private or public offerings. Bluegreen has
agreed to reimburse Woodbridge for certain expenses, including
legal and professional fees incurred in connection with this
effort. As of June 30, 2009, Woodbridge was reimbursed
approximately $602,000 from Bluegreen and has recorded a
receivable of approximately $481,000.
On November 19, 2007, BFCs shareholders approved the
merger of I.R.E RAG, a 45.5% subsidiary of BFC, with and
into BFC. The sole assets of I.R.E. RAG were
4,764,285 shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock
and 500,000 shares of BFCs Class B Common Stock.
In connection with the merger, the shareholders of I.R.E. RAG,
other than BFC, received an aggregate of approximately
2,601,300 shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock
and 273,000 shares of BFCs Class B Common Stock,
representing their respective pro rata beneficial ownership
interests in the shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock
and Class B Common Stock owned by I.R.E. RAG, and the
4,764,285 shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock
and 500,000 shares of BFCs Class B Common Stock
that were owned by I.R.E. RAG were canceled. The shareholders of
I.R.E. RAG, other than BFC, were Levan Enterprises, Ltd. and
I.R.E. Properties, Inc., each of which is an affiliate of Alan
B. Levan, BFCs Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
President. The transaction was consummated on November 30,
2007.
Certain of BFCs affiliates, including its executive
officers, have independently made investments with their own
funds in a limited partnership that BFC sponsored in 2001.
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Summary
Compensation Table
The following table sets forth certain summary information
concerning compensation which, during the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company, BankAtlantic
Bancorp, BankAtlantic and Woodbridge paid to or accrued on
behalf of Alan B. Levan, the Companys Chief Executive
Officer, and John E. Abdo and John K. Grelle, who, other than
Mr. Levan, were the Companys two most highly
compensated executive officers during the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008. Messrs. Levan, Abdo and Grelle are
sometimes hereinafter collectively referred to as the BFC
Named Executive Officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
Deferred
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
Awards
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Source(1)
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary ($)
|
|
($)(2)
|
|
($)(3)
|
|
($)(4)
|
|
Earnings ($)(5)
|
|
($)(6)
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
Alan B. Levan,
|
|
BFC
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
677,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
279,125
|
|
|
|
267,956
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227,863
|
|
|
|
1,452,319
|
|
Chairman of the
|
|
BBX
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
541,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297,721
|
|
|
|
283,055
|
|
|
|
20,934
|
|
|
|
21,771
|
|
|
|
1,165,309
|
|
Board, President and Chief Executive Officer(7)
|
|
WDGH
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
151,218
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
401,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
1,054,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,370,421
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
978,295
|
|
|
|
551,011
|
|
|
|
20,934
|
|
|
|
251,134
|
|
|
|
3,671,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BFC
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
676,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
312,352
|
|
|
|
809,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216,468
|
|
|
|
2,014,443
|
|
|
|
BBX
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
590,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
351,664
|
|
|
|
21,793
|
|
|
|
53,905
|
|
|
|
21,000
|
|
|
|
1,038,842
|
|
|
|
WDGH
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
400,400
|
|
|
|
6,708
|
|
|
|
372,409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
781,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,667,225
|
|
|
|
6,708
|
|
|
|
1,036,425
|
|
|
|
831,071
|
|
|
|
53,905
|
|
|
|
238,968
|
|
|
|
3,834,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John E. Abdo,
|
|
BFC
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
660,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
279,125
|
|
|
|
223,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,163,083
|
|
Vice Chairman
|
|
BBX
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
509,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198,480
|
|
|
|
281,785
|
|
|
|
12,147
|
|
|
|
9,240
|
|
|
|
1,010,926
|
|
of the Board(7)
|
|
WDGH
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
151,218
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
534,538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
307,740
|
|
|
|
1,493,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,321,231
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
1,012,143
|
|
|
|
505,004
|
|
|
|
12,147
|
|
|
|
316,980
|
|
|
|
3,667,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BFC
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
590,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
312,352
|
|
|
|
594,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,497,712
|
|
|
|
BBX
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
415,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
234,443
|
|
|
|
15,240
|
|
|
|
25,849
|
|
|
|
21,675
|
|
|
|
712,347
|
|
|
|
WDGH
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
487,988
|
|
|
|
8,175
|
|
|
|
505,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303,181
|
|
|
|
1,304,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,493,608
|
|
|
|
8,175
|
|
|
|
1,051,988
|
|
|
|
610,120
|
|
|
|
25,849
|
|
|
|
324,856
|
|
|
|
3,514,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John K. Grelle,
|
|
BFC
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
192,166
|
|
|
|
79,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,519
|
|
|
|
278,205
|
|
Executive
|
|
BBX
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief
|
|
WDGH
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
145,191
|
|
|
|
54,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,071
|
|
Financial Officer(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337,357
|
|
|
|
134,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,519
|
|
|
|
478,276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts identified as BFC represent amounts paid or accrued by
the Company. Amounts identified as BBX represent amounts paid or
accrued by BankAtlantic Bancorp and BankAtlantic. Amounts
identified as WDGH represent amounts paid or accrued by
Woodbridge. |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts for 2008 represent discretionary cash bonuses paid to or
accrued on behalf of each BFC Named Executive Officer by
Woodbridge (and, for Mr. Grelle, by the Company) based on a
subjective evaluation of their overall performance in areas
outside those that can be objectively measured from financial
results. |
|
(3) |
|
All options are to purchase shares of the respective
companys Class A Common Stock. The amounts for 2008
represent the dollar amounts recognized for financial statement
reporting purposes for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008, in accordance with FAS 123(R), without taking into
account an estimate of forfeitures related to service-based
vesting of stock option grants, including amounts from awards
granted prior to the 2008 fiscal year. Assumptions used in the
calculation of these amounts are included in footnote 23 to the
Companys audited financial statements for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2008 included elsewhere in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. There were no forfeitures during
2008. None of the Company, BankAtlantic Bancorp or Woodbridge
granted any options to the BFC Named Executive Officers during
2008. |
|
(4) |
|
Amounts for 2008 represent, with respect to the Company, cash
bonuses granted to each of Messrs. Levan and Abdo under the
formula-based component of the Companys 2008 annual
incentive program based on the achievement of pre-established,
objective individual and company-wide annual financial
performance goals. In addition, the 2008 amounts relating to
BankAtlantic Bancorp represent (i) cash bonuses paid to
each of Messrs. Levan and Abdo under the formula-based
component of BankAtlantic Bancorps 2008 annual incentive
program as a result of the achievement during the first three
quarters of 2008 of the quarterly financial performance
objectives of such program related to BankAtlantic
Bancorps core non-interest expense reductions and
(ii) cash bonuses of $4,462 and $3,192 earned by
Messrs. Levan and Abdo, respectively, under the
BankAtlantic Profit Sharing Stretch Plan with respect to the
fourth quarter of 2007, but paid to Messrs. Levan and Abdo
during the first quarter of 2008. |
|
(5) |
|
Represents the increase in the actuarial present value of
accumulated benefits under the Retirement Plan for Employees of
BankAtlantic (the BankAtlantic Retirement Plan).
Additional information regarding the BankAtlantic Retirement
Plan is set forth in the narrative accompanying the table
entitled Pension Benefits 2008 below. |
|
(6) |
|
Items included under All Other Compensation for 2008
for each of the BFC Named Executive Officers are set forth in
the table below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Levan
|
|
|
Abdo
|
|
|
Grelle
|
|
|
BFC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perquisites and other benefits
|
|
$
|
74,258
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Amount paid for life and disability insurance premiums
|
|
|
135,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount paid for automobile expenses
|
|
|
18,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
227,863
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BBX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perquisites and other benefits
|
|
$
|
303
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Insurance premiums
|
|
|
12,228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributions to the retirement and 401(k) plans
|
|
|
9,200
|
|
|
|
9,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends on restricted stock, REIT shares
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
21,771
|
|
|
$
|
9,240
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WDGH
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance premiums
|
|
$
|
1,500
|
|
|
$
|
1,500
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Management fees paid to Abdo Companies, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,500
|
|
|
$
|
307,740
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
The value of perquisites and other benefits included in the rows
entitled Perquisites and other benefits in the table
above is calculated based on their incremental cost to the
respective company, which is determined based on the actual cost
of providing these perquisites and other benefits. All
perquisites and other benefits received in 2008 by
Mr. Levan from the Company related to his personal use of
the Companys tickets to entertainment and sporting events. |
|
|
|
Amounts included in the row entitled Insurance
premiums under BBX in the table above were
paid in connection with BankAtlantics Split-Dollar Life
Insurance Plan (the BankAtlantic Split-Dollar Plan).
Additional information regarding the BankAtlantic Split-Dollar
Plan is set forth in the narrative accompanying the
Pension Benefits 2008 table below. |
|
|
|
Mr. Abdo is the principal shareholder and Chief Executive
Officer of Abdo Companies, Inc. |
|
|
|
During 2008, each of Messrs. Levan and Abdo received $1,500
as reimbursement for insurance premiums for waiving
participation in Woodbridges medical, dental and vision
plans. These amounts are included in the row entitled
Insurance premiums under WDGH in the
table above. |
|
(7) |
|
During 2008, each of Messrs. Levan and Abdo also received
options to acquire 50,000 shares of Bluegreens common
stock at an exercise price of $9.31 per share, which options are
scheduled to vest on May 21, 2013 and expire on
May 21, 2018. During 2008, each of Messrs. Levan and
Abdo were also granted 71,000 shares of restricted common
stock of Bluegreen and options to purchase an additional
71,000 shares of Bluegreens common stock at an
exercise price of $7.50 per share. These additional options and
restricted shares are scheduled to vest on May 21, 2013
(and the options are scheduled to expire on May 21, 2015);
however, in the event of a
change-in-control
of Bluegreen at a price of at least $12.50 per share of common
stock, a percentage (of up to 100%) of the options and
restricted shares will vest depending on both the timing of the
change-in-control
and the actual price for a share of Bluegreens common
stock in the transaction which results in the
change-in-control.
The aggregate grant date fair value of the options granted by
Bluegreen to each of Messrs. Levan and Abdo during 2008
computed in accordance with FAS 123(R) was $370,700. The grant
date fair value of the restricted stock awards granted by
Bluegreen to each of Messrs. Levan and Abdo during 2008
computed in accordance with FAS 123(R) was $495,580. |
|
(8) |
|
Mr. Grelle joined the Company as acting Chief Financial
Officer on January 11, 2008 and was appointed Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company on
May 20, 2008. Mr. Grelle was also appointed Executive
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and principal accounting
officer of Woodbridge on May 20, 2008. Because
Mr. Grelle was not a named executive officer of BFC for
2007, no compensation information with respect to
Mr. Grelle is provided for 2007. |
147
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2008
The following table sets forth certain information regarding
equity-based awards of the Company held as of December 31,
2008 by the BFC Named Executive Officers (other than
Mr. Grelle, who does not currently hold, and as of
December 31, 2008 did not hold, any equity-based awards of
the Company).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
Securities
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Option
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Options
|
|
Unearned
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Expiration
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
Options
|
|
Price
|
|
Date
|
|
Alan B. Levan
|
|
|
210,579
|
(1)(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
1.84
|
|
|
|
2/7/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,750
|
(1)(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.40
|
|
|
|
7/28/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
(2)(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.92
|
|
|
|
7/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
(2)(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.36
|
|
|
|
6/5/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
(2)(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.44
|
|
|
|
6/4/2017
|
|
John E. Abdo
|
|
|
210,579
|
(1)(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
1.84
|
|
|
|
2/7/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,750
|
(1)(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.40
|
|
|
|
7/28/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
(2)(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.92
|
|
|
|
7/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
(2)(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.36
|
|
|
|
6/5/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
(2)(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.44
|
|
|
|
6/4/2017
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents options to purchase shares of BFCs Class B
Common Stock. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents options to purchase shares of BFCs Class A
Common Stock. |
|
(3) |
|
Vested on February 7, 2008. |
|
(4) |
|
Vests on July 28, 2009. |
|
(5) |
|
Vests on July 11, 2010. |
|
(6) |
|
Vests on June 5, 2011. |
|
(7) |
|
Vests on June 4, 2012. |
148
The following table sets forth certain information regarding
equity-based awards of BankAtlantic Bancorp held by
Messrs. Levan and Abdo as of December 31, 2008.
Mr. Grelle does not currently hold, and as of
December 31, 2008 did not hold, any equity-based awards of
BankAtlantic Bancorp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
Securities
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Option
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Options(1)
|
|
Options(1)
|
|
Unearned
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Expiration
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
Options
|
|
Price
|
|
Date
|
|
Alan B. Levan
|
|
|
15,676
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
42.79
|
|
|
|
3/4/2012
|
|
|
|
|
15,676
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
37.05
|
|
|
|
3/31/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
91.00
|
|
|
|
7/5/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
95.10
|
|
|
|
7/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
74.05
|
|
|
|
7/10/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
46.90
|
|
|
|
6/4/2017
|
|
John E. Abdo
|
|
|
10,451
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
42.79
|
|
|
|
3/4/2012
|
|
|
|
|
10,451
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
37.05
|
|
|
|
3/31/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
91.00
|
|
|
|
7/5/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
95.10
|
|
|
|
7/11/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
74.05
|
|
|
|
7/10/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
(7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
46.90
|
|
|
|
6/4/2017
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All options are to purchase shares of BankAtlantic
Bancorps Class A Common Stock. |
|
(2) |
|
Vested on March 4, 2007. |
|
(3) |
|
Vested on March 31, 2008. |
|
(4) |
|
Vests on July 6, 2009. |
|
(5) |
|
Vests on July 12, 2010. |
|
(6) |
|
Vests on July 11, 2011. |
|
(7) |
|
Vests on June 5, 2012. |
Messrs. Levan and Abdo also held equity-based awards of
Woodbridge as of December 31, 2008. See Information
About Woodbridge Executive Compensation
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal
Year-End 2008.
Pension
Benefits 2008
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to accumulated benefits as of December 31, 2008 under any
BankAtlantic Bancorp plan that provides for payments or other
benefits to Messrs. Levan and Abdo at, following, or in
connection with, retirement. Mr. Grelle is not entitled to
receive any payment or other benefit at, following, or in
connection with, retirement under any BankAtlantic Bancorp plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Years
|
|
of Accumulated
|
|
Payments During
|
Name
|
|
Plan Name
|
|
Credited Service
|
|
Benefit(1)
|
|
Last Fiscal Year
|
|
Alan B. Levan
|
|
|
Retirement Plan for Employees of BankAtlantic
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
988,376
|
|
|
$
|
0
|
|
John E. Abdo
|
|
|
Retirement Plan for Employees of BankAtlantic
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
449,510
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are
included in footnote 20 to BankAtlantic Bancorps audited
financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008 included in BankAtlantic Bancorps Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
March 16, |
149
|
|
|
|
|
2009, except that retirement age was assumed to be 65, the
normal retirement age as defined in the BankAtlantic Retirement
Plan. |
BankAtlantic
Retirement Plan
Messrs. Levan and Abdo are participants in the BankAtlantic
Retirement Plan, which is a defined benefit plan. Effective
December 31, 1998, BankAtlantic froze the benefits under
the BankAtlantic Retirement Plan. Participants who were employed
at December 1, 1998, became fully vested in their benefits
under the BankAtlantic Retirement Plan. While the BankAtlantic
Retirement Plan is frozen, there will be no future benefit
accruals. The BankAtlantic Retirement Plan was designed to
provide retirement income based on an employees salary and
years of active service, determined as of December 31,
1998. The cost of the BankAtlantic Retirement Plan is paid by
BankAtlantic and all contributions are actuarially determined.
In general, the BankAtlantic Retirement Plan provides for
monthly payments to or on behalf of each covered employee upon
such employees retirement (with provisions for early or
postponed retirement), death or disability. As a result of the
freezing of future benefit accruals, the amount of the monthly
payments is based generally upon two factors: (1) the
employees average regular monthly compensation for the
five consecutive years out of the last ten years ended
December 31, 1998, or prior retirement, death or
disability, that produces the highest average monthly rate of
regular compensation; and (2) the employees years of
service with BankAtlantic at December 31, 1998. Benefits
are payable for the retirees life, with ten years
worth of payments guaranteed. The benefits are not subject to
any reduction for Social Security or any other external benefits.
In 1996, BankAtlantic amended the BankAtlantic Retirement Plan
and adopted a supplemental benefit for certain of its
executives, as permitted by the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 and the Code. This was done because of a
change in the Code that operated to restrict the amount of the
executives compensation that may be taken into account for
BankAtlantic Retirement Plan purposes, regardless of the
executives actual compensation. The intent of the
supplemental benefit, when added to the regular BankAtlantic
Retirement Plan benefit, was to provide to certain executives
the same retirement benefits that they would have received had
the Code limits not been enacted, subject to other requirements
of the Code. The approximate targeted percentage of
pre-retirement compensation for which Mr. Levan will be
eligible under the BankAtlantic Retirement Plan as a result of
the supplemental benefit at age 65 is 33%. Mr. Abdo is
not entitled to the supplemental benefit. The supplemental
benefit also was frozen as of December 31, 1998. Because
the percentage of pre-retirement compensation payable from the
BankAtlantic Retirement Plan to Mr. Levan, including the
BankAtlantic Retirement Plans supplemental benefit, fell
short of the benefit that Mr. Levan would have received
under the BankAtlantic Retirement Plan absent the Code limits,
BankAtlantic adopted the BankAtlantic Split-Dollar Plan
described below.
The following table illustrates annual pension benefits at
age 65 for various levels of compensation and years of
service at December 31, 1998, the date on which the
BankAtlantic Retirement Plan benefits were frozen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Annual Benefits
|
|
|
Years of Credited Service at December 31, 1998
|
Average Five Year Compensation at December 31, 1998
|
|
5 Years
|
|
10 Years
|
|
20 Years
|
|
30 Years
|
|
40 Years
|
|
$120,000
|
|
$
|
10,380
|
|
|
$
|
20,760
|
|
|
$
|
41,520
|
|
|
$
|
62,280
|
|
|
$
|
83,160
|
|
$150,000
|
|
|
13,005
|
|
|
|
26,010
|
|
|
|
52,020
|
|
|
|
78,030
|
|
|
|
104,160
|
|
$160,000 and above
|
|
|
13,880
|
|
|
|
27,760
|
|
|
|
55,520
|
|
|
|
83,280
|
|
|
|
111,160
|
|
BankAtlantic
Split-Dollar Plan
BankAtlantic adopted the BankAtlantic Split-Dollar Plan in 1996
to provide additional retirement benefits to Mr. Levan,
whose monthly benefits under the BankAtlantic Retirement Plan
were limited by changes to the Code. Under the BankAtlantic
Split-Dollar Plan and its accompanying agreement with
Mr. Levan, BankAtlantic arranged for the purchase of an
insurance policy insuring the life of Mr. Levan. Pursuant
to its agreement with Mr. Levan, BankAtlantic has made and
will continue to make premium payments for the
150
policy. The policy is anticipated to accumulate significant cash
value over time, which cash value is expected to supplement
Mr. Levans retirement benefit payable from the
BankAtlantic Retirement Plan. Mr. Levan owns the policy but
BankAtlantic will be reimbursed for the amount of premiums that
BankAtlantic pays for the policy upon the earlier of his
retirement or death. The portion of the amount paid in prior
years attributable to the 2008 premium for the policy that is
considered compensation to Mr. Levan is included under
All Other Compensation in the row entitled
BBX in the Summary Compensation Table
above. The BankAtlantic Split-Dollar Plan was not included in
the freezing of the BankAtlantic Retirement Plan, and
BankAtlantic has continued to make premium payments for the
policy since 1998.
DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION
BFCs compensation committee recommends director
compensation to the board based on factors it considers
appropriate and based on the recommendations of management. In
2008, each non-employee director of BFC received $100,000 for
service on the board of directors, payable in cash, restricted
stock or non-qualified stock options, in such combinations as
the director elected, provided that no more than $50,000 was
payable in cash. The restricted stock and stock options are
granted in BFCs Class A Common Stock under BFCs
2005 Stock Incentive Plan. Restricted stock vests monthly over a
12-month
service period and stock options are fully vested on the date of
grant, have a ten-year term and have an exercise price equal to
the closing market price of a share of BFCs Class A
Common Stock on the date of grant. The number of stock options
and restricted stock granted is determined by BFC based on
assumptions and formulas typically used to value these types of
securities. In addition to compensation for their service on the
board of directors, BFC pays compensation to directors for their
service on the boards committees. During 2008, this
compensation was comprised of the following. The Chairman of the
audit committee received an annual cash retainer of $15,000. All
other members of the audit committee received annual cash
retainers of $10,000. The Chairman of the compensation committee
and the Chairman of the nominating/corporate governance
committee each received an annual cash retainer of $3,500. Other
than the Chairmen, members of the compensation committee and the
nominating/corporate governance committee were not separately
compensated for their service on such committees. For 2008, in
the aggregate, BFC paid $200,000 in cash, granted
120,480 shares of restricted shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock and granted non-qualified stock
options to purchase 252,150 shares of Class A Common
Stock to its non-employee directors. Directors who are also
officers of BFC or its subsidiaries do not receive additional
compensation for their service as directors.
Director
Compensation Table 2008
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
compensation paid to BFCs non-employee directors for their
service during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned
|
|
Stock
|
|
Option
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Paid
|
|
Awards
|
|
Awards
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
Compensation
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
Name
|
|
in Cash ($)
|
|
(1)(3)($)
|
|
(2)(3)($)
|
|
Compensation ($)
|
|
Earnings ($)
|
|
Compensation ($)
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
D. Keith Cobb(4)
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
Oscar Holzmann
|
|
|
65,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,000
|
|
Neil Sterling
|
|
|
63,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,500
|
|
Earl Pertnoy
|
|
|
63,500
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,500
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All restricted stock awards are in shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock. The dollar amount represents the
compensation recognized for financial statement reporting
purposes for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, in
accordance with FAS 123(R), including amounts from awards
granted prior to 2008. Assumptions used in the calculation of
these amounts are included in footnote 23 to BFCs audited
financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008 included elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. There were no forfeitures during 2008. The
grant date fair value computed in accordance with
FAS 123(R) of the restricted stock awards granted to each
of Messrs. Cobb and Pertnoy during 2008 was $50,000. |
151
|
|
|
(2) |
|
All options are to purchase shares of BFCs Class A
Common Stock and vested fully as of the date of grant. The
dollar amount represents the compensation recognized for
financial statement reporting purposes for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008, in accordance with FAS 123(R),
without taking into account an estimate of forfeitures related
to service-based vesting of stock option grants, including
amounts from awards granted prior to 2008. Assumptions used in
the calculation of these amounts are included in footnote 23 to
the Companys audited financial statements for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2008 included elsewhere in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus. There were no forfeitures
during 2008. The grant date fair value computed in accordance
with FAS 123 (R) of the stock option awards granted to each of
Messrs. Holzmann and Sterling during 2008 was $50,000. |
|
(3) |
|
The table below sets forth the aggregate number of stock options
and the aggregate number of shares of restricted stock held as
of December 31, 2008 by each non-employee director of BFC
during the year ended December 31, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
Stock
|
Name
|
|
Stock(a)
|
|
Options(b)
|
|
D. Keith Cobb
|
|
|
25,100
|
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
Oscar Holzmann
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,513
|
|
Neil Sterling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,513
|
|
Earl Pertnoy
|
|
|
25,100
|
|
|
|
34,330
|
(c)
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
All restricted stock awards are in shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock. |
|
(b) |
|
Represents options to purchase shares of BFCs Class A
Common Stock or Class B Common Stock as follows: D. Keith
Cobb 6,250 shares of Class B Common Stock;
Oscar Holzmann 151,223 shares of Class A
Common Stock and 20,290 shares of Class B Common
Stock; Neil Sterling 151,223 shares of
Class A Common Stock and 20,290 shares of Class B
Common Stock; and Earl Pertnoy 34,330 shares of
Class B Common Stock. |
|
(c) |
|
Represents options held by Pertnoy Parent Limited Partnership.
Mr. Pertnoy was the President of Pertnoy Parent, Inc., the
General Partner of Pertnoy Parent Limited Partnership. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
During 2008, Mr. Cobb also received compensation valued at
$120,000 for his service as a member of BankAtlantic
Bancorps board of directors and as Chairman of its audit
committee. |
DESCRIPTION
OF CAPITAL STOCK
The following summary of BFCs capital stock is subject in
all respects to applicable Florida law and BFCs Amended
and Restated Articles of Incorporation and By-laws. See
Where You Can Find More Information.
BFCs authorized capital stock currently consists of
(i) 100,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock,
par value $.01 per share, (ii) 20,000,000 shares of
Class B Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, and
(iii) 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value
$.01 per share, of which 15,000 shares have been designated
5% Cumulative Preferred Stock and 100,000 shares have been
designated Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock.
As described throughout this joint proxy statement/prospectus,
in connection with the merger, the number of authorized shares
of BFCs Class A Common Stock will be increased from
100,000,000 shares to 150,000,000 shares, thereby
increasing the total number of shares of authorized capital
stock of BFC from 130,000,000 shares to
180,000,000 shares. As of August 3, 2009,
38,275,122 shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock,
6,854,381 shares of BFCs Class B Common Stock,
15,000 shares of BFCs 5% Cumulative Preferred Stock
and no shares of BFCs Series A Junior Participating
Preferred Stock were issued and outstanding.
Voting
Rights
Except as provided by law or as specifically provided in
BFCs Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation,
holders of BFCs Class A Common Stock and Class B
Common Stock vote as a single group. Except as provided by law,
the 5% Cumulative Preferred Stock has no voting rights. Each
share of BFCs
152
Class A Common Stock is entitled to one vote and BFCs
Class A Common Stock represents in the aggregate 22% of the
total voting power of BFCs Class A Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock. Each share of BFCs Class B
Common Stock is entitled to the number of votes per share which
will represent in the aggregate 78% of the total voting power of
the BFCs Class A Common Stock and Class B Common
Stock. These fixed voting percentages will remain in effect
until the total number of outstanding shares of BFCs
Class B Common Stock falls below 1,800,000. If the total
number of outstanding shares of BFCs Class B Common
Stock is less than 1,800,000 but greater than 1,400,000, then
BFCs Class A Common Stock will hold a voting
percentage equal to 40% and BFCs Class B Common Stock
will hold a voting percentage equal to the remaining 60%. If the
total number of outstanding shares of BFCs Class B
Common Stock is less than 1,400,000 but greater than 500,000,
then BFCs Class A Common Stock will hold a voting
percentage equal to 53% and BFCs Class B Common Stock
will hold a voting percentage equal to the remaining 47%. If the
total number of outstanding shares of BFCs Class B
Common Stock is less than 500,000, then each share of BFCs
Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock will be
entitled to one vote.
Under Florida law, holders of BFCs Class A Common
Stock are entitled to vote as a separate voting group, and would
therefore have an effective veto power, on amendments to
BFCs Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation which
would have any of the following effects:
|
|
|
|
|
effect an exchange or reclassification of all or part of the
shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock into shares of
another class;
|
|
|
|
effect an exchange or reclassification, or create a right of
exchange, of all or part of the shares of another class into
shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock;
|
|
|
|
change the designation, rights, preferences, or limitations of
all or part of the shares of BFCs Class A Common
Stock;
|
|
|
|
change all or part of the shares of BFCs Class A
Common Stock into a different number of shares of Class A
Common Stock;
|
|
|
|
create a new class of shares which have rights or preferences
with respect to distributions or to dissolution that are prior,
superior, or substantially equal to the shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock;
|
|
|
|
increase the rights, preferences, or number of authorized shares
of any class that, after giving effect to the amendment, have
rights or preferences with respect to distributions or to
dissolution that are prior, superior, or substantially equal to
the shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock;
|
|
|
|
limit or deny an existing preemptive right of all or part of the
shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock; or
|
|
|
|
cancel or otherwise affect rights to distributions or dividends
that have accumulated but not yet been declared on all or part
of the shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock.
|
Under Florida Law, holders of BFCs Class B Common
Stock or 5% Cumulative Preferred Stock are each entitled to vote
as a separate voting group and would therefore have effective
veto power on amendments to BFCs Amended and Restated
Articles of Incorporation which would affect the rights of the
holders of BFCs Class B Common Stock or 5% Cumulative
Preferred Stock in substantially the same manner as described
above.
Holders of BFCs Class A Common Stock, Class B
Common Stock and 5% Cumulative Preferred Stock each are also
entitled to vote as a separate voting group on any plan of
merger or plan of share exchange which contains a provision
which, if included in a proposed amendment to BFCs Amended
and Restated Articles of Incorporation, would require their vote
as a separate voting group.
153
In addition to the rights afforded to BFCs shareholders
under Florida law, BFCs Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation provide that the approval of the holders of
BFCs Class B Common Stock, voting as a separate
voting group, will be required before any of the following
actions may be taken:
|
|
|
|
|
the issuance of any additional shares of BFCs Class B
Common Stock, other than a stock dividend issued to holders of
the Class B Common Stock;
|
|
|
|
the reduction of the number of outstanding shares of BFCs
Class B Common Stock (other than upon conversion of the
Class B Common Stock into Class A Common Stock or upon
a voluntary disposition to BFC); or
|
|
|
|
any amendments of the voting rights provisions of BFCs
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation.
|
Convertibility
of Class B Common Stock
Holders of BFCs Class B Common Stock possess the
right, at any time, to convert any or all of their shares into
shares of Class A Common Stock on a share-for-share basis.
Dividends
and Other Distributions; Liquidation Rights
Holders of BFCs Class A Common Stock and Class B
Common Stock are entitled to receive cash dividends, when and as
declared by BFCs board of directors out of legally
available assets. Any distribution per share with respect to
BFCs Class A Common Stock will be identical to the
distribution per share with respect to the Class B Common
Stock, except that a stock dividend or other non-cash
distribution to holders of Class A Common Stock may be
declared and issued only in the form of Class A Common
Stock while a dividend or other non-cash distribution to holders
of Class B Common Stock may be declared and issued in the
form of either Class A Common Stock or Class B Common
Stock at the discretion of BFCs board of directors,
provided that the number of any shares so issued or any non-cash
distribution is the same on a per share basis. No dividend or
other distribution (other than a dividend or distribution
payable solely in Class A Common Stock or Class B
Common Stock) shall be paid on or set apart for payment on
BFCs Class A Common Stock or Class B Common
Stock until such time as all accrued and unpaid dividends on
BFCs 5% Cumulative Preferred Stock have been or
contemporaneously are declared or paid and a sum is set apart
sufficient for payment of such accrued and unpaid dividends.
Holders of BFCs 5% Cumulative Preferred Stock are entitled
to receive, when and as declared by BFCs board of
directors, cumulative quarterly cash dividends on each such
share at a rate per annum of 5% of the stated value of $1,000
per share from the date of issuance. In addition, in the event
BFC defaults on its obligation to make dividend payments on its
5% Cumulative Preferred Stock, the holders of BFCs 5%
Cumulative Preferred Stock are entitled, in place of BFC, to
receive directly from Benihana certain payments on the shares of
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of Benihana (the
Benihana Preferred Stock) owned by BFC or on the
shares of Benihanas common stock received by BFC upon
conversion of the Benihana Preferred Stock.
The 5% Cumulative Preferred Stock liquidation preference in the
event of BFCs voluntary liquidation or winding up is equal
to its stated value of $1,000 per share plus any accumulated and
unpaid dividends or an amount equal to the redemption price
described below under Preemptive or Payment Rights;
Redemption of 5% Convertible Preferred Stock. Upon
any liquidation, the assets legally available for distribution
to BFCs shareholders after payment of the 5% Cumulative
Preferred Stock liquidation preference will be distributed
ratably among the holders of BFCs Class A Common
Stock and Class B Common Stock.
Preemptive
or Payment Rights; Redemption of 5% Cumulative Convertible
Preferred Stock
Holders of BFCs Class A Common Stock and Class B
Common Stock have no preemptive or other subscription rights,
and there are no redemption or sinking fund provisions relating
to shares of such stock. Holders of shares of BFCs 5%
Cumulative Preferred Stock have no preemptive or other
subscription rights, and there is no sinking fund provision
relating to the shares of such stock.
154
The shares of BFCs 5% Cumulative Preferred Stock may be
redeemed at BFCs option at any time and from time to time
at redemption prices ranging from $1,030 per share for the year
2009 to $1,000 per share for the year 2015 and thereafter. In
addition, BFC is required to redeem shares of its 5% Cumulative
Preferred Stock with the net proceeds it receives in the event
(i) BFC sells any of its shares of Benihana Preferred
Stock, (ii) BFC sells any shares of Benihanas common
stock received upon conversion of the Benihana Preferred Stock
or (iii) Benihana redeems any shares of the Benihana
Preferred Stock owned by BFC.
Certain
Anti-Takeover Effects
The terms of BFCs Class A Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock make the sale or transfer of control
of BFC or the removal of BFCs incumbent directors unlikely
without the concurrence of the holders of BFCs
Class B Common Stock. BFCs Amended and Restated
Articles of Incorporation and By-laws also contain other
provisions which could have anti-takeover effects. These
provisions include, without limitation:
|
|
|
|
|
the provisions in BFCs Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation regarding the voting rights of the Class B
Common Stock;
|
|
|
|
the authority of BFCs board of directors to issue
additional shares of preferred stock and to fix the relative
rights and preferences of the preferred stock without additional
shareholder approval;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that BFCs board of directors has in the past
adopted, and has the authority to and, as discussed below and
elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, expects to
adopt in the future, a shareholder rights plan which, if
triggered, will have the effect of causing substantial dilution
to a person or group who attempts to acquire BFC on terms not
approved by its board of directors;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the current division of BFCs board of directors into three
classes of directors with three-year staggered terms (however,
as described throughout this joint proxy statement/prospectus,
BFCs By-laws will be amended in connection with the merger
to provide that each director elected or appointed to BFCs
board of directors on or after the date of the amendment will
serve for a term expiring at BFCs next annual meeting of
shareholders, such that as a result of this amendment (and
subject to any future amendments), following BFCs 2012
annual meeting of shareholders, BFCs board of directors
will no longer be divided into multiple classes with staggered
terms); and
|
|
|
|
the advance notice procedures to be complied with by BFCs
shareholders in order to make shareholder proposals or nominate
directors.
|
Anticipated
Adoption of Shareholder Rights Plan
As discussed elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus,
in connection with the termination of Woodbridges
shareholder rights plan, BFC intends to adopt a shareholder
rights plan substantially similar to the one in place at
Woodbridge in an effort to preserve available net operating loss
carryforwards for potential utilization as an offset against
future taxable income. At the time, if any, that the shareholder
rights plan is adopted, BFCs board of directors will
declare a dividend distribution of preferred stock purchase
rights. As contemplated, the purchase rights will become
exercisable only upon the acquisition by any person or group of
5% or more of BFCs outstanding common stock without the
approval of BFCs board of directors and, if exercised, the
purchase rights will cause substantial dilution to any such
acquiring person or group.
155
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth, as of August 3, 2009,
certain information as to BFCs Class A Common Stock
and Class B Common Stock beneficially owned by persons
known by BFC to own in excess of 5% of the outstanding shares of
such stock. In addition, this table includes the outstanding
securities beneficially owned by (i) each BFC Named
Executive Officer, (ii) each of the Companys
directors as of August 3, 2009 and (iii) the
Companys directors and executive officers as of
August 3, 2009 as a group. Management knows of no person,
except as listed below, who beneficially owned more than 5% of
the outstanding shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock
or Class B Common Stock as of August 3, 2009. Except
as otherwise indicated, the information provided in the
following table was obtained from filings with the SEC and with
BFC pursuant to the Exchange Act. For purposes of the table
below, in accordance with
Rule 13d-3
under the Exchange Act, a person is deemed to be the beneficial
owner of any shares which he or she has or shares, directly or
indirectly, voting or investment power, or which he or she has
the right to acquire beneficial ownership of at any time within
60 days after August 3, 2009. As used herein,
voting power is the power to vote, or direct the
voting of, shares, and investment power includes the
power to dispose of, or direct the disposition of, such shares.
Unless otherwise noted, each beneficial owner has sole voting
and sole investment power over the shares beneficially owned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
Class B
|
|
Percent of
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
Common
|
|
Class A
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Stock
|
|
Common
|
|
Common
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Notes
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Stock
|
|
Stock
|
|
I.R.E. Properties, Inc.
|
|
|
(1,2,4,5,10
|
)
|
|
|
4,662,927
|
|
|
|
561,017
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
Alan B. Levan
|
|
|
(1,2,3,4,5,6,10
|
)
|
|
|
7,243,415
|
|
|
|
3,247,431
|
|
|
|
25.3
|
%
|
|
|
45.4
|
%
|
John E. Abdo
|
|
|
(1,2,3,4,6,7,10
|
)
|
|
|
3,356,771
|
|
|
|
3,273,797
|
|
|
|
16.0
|
%
|
|
|
45.7
|
%
|
John K. Grelle
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
D. Keith Cobb
|
|
|
(1,2,3,10
|
)
|
|
|
97,656
|
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Oscar Holzmann
|
|
|
(1,2,3,10
|
)
|
|
|
164,361
|
|
|
|
20,290
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Neil Sterling
|
|
|
(1,2,3,10
|
)
|
|
|
164,361
|
|
|
|
20,290
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Dr. Herbert A. Wertheim
|
|
|
(1,8,10
|
)
|
|
|
3,968,157
|
|
|
|
416,448
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
|
|
6.1
|
%
|
SC Fundamental Value Fund L.P.
|
|
|
(9,10
|
)
|
|
|
3,913,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
All directors and executive officers of BFC as of August 3,
2009 as a group (7 persons)
|
|
|
(1,3,4,5,6,7,10
|
)
|
|
|
11,026,564
|
|
|
|
6,575,080
|
|
|
|
39.0
|
%
|
|
|
87.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than one percent of class. |
|
(1) |
|
BFCs Class B Common Stock is convertible on a
share-for-share basis at any time at the beneficial owners
discretion. However, see footnote 6 below regarding restrictions
on Mr. Abdos right to convert his shares of
BFCs Class B Common Stock into shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock. The number of shares of BFCs
Class B Common Stock held by each beneficial owner is not
separately included in the Class A Common Stock
Ownership column, but is included for the purpose of
calculating the percent of BFCs Class A Common Stock
held by each beneficial owner. |
|
(2) |
|
Mailing address is 2100 West Cypress Creek Road,
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Includes shares that may be acquired within 60 days after
August 3, 2009 pursuant to the exercise of stock options to
purchase shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock or
Class B Common Stock as follows: Alan B. Levan
304,329 shares of Class B Common Stock; John E.
Abdo 304,329 shares of Class B Common
Stock; D. Keith Cobb 6,250 shares of
Class B Common Stock; Oscar Holzmann
151,223 shares of Class A Common Stock and
20,290 shares of Class B Common Stock; Neil
Sterling 151,223 shares of Class A Common
Stock and 20,290 shares of Class B Common Stock; and
Maria Scheker 7,022 shares of Class B
Common Stock. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
BFC may be deemed to be controlled by Messrs. Levan and
Abdo, who collectively may be deemed to have an aggregate
beneficial ownership of shares of BFCs Class A Common
Stock and Class B Common |
156
|
|
|
|
|
Stock, including shares that may be acquired pursuant to the
exercise of stock options (as set forth in footnote 3 above),
representing 74.2% of the total voting power of BFC. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Mr. Levans share ownership includes the shares of
BFCs Class A Common Stock and Class B Common
Stock held by I.R.E. Properties, Inc. (as set forth in the
table) as well as 1,270,302 shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock and 133,314 shares of BFCs
Class B Common Stock held by Florida Partners Corporation
and 1,298,749 shares of BFCs Class A Common
Stock and 146,865 shares of BFCs Class B Common
Stock held by Levan Enterprises, Ltd. I.R.E. Properties, Inc. is
100% owned by Levan Enterprises, Ltd. and may be deemed to be
the controlling shareholder of Florida Partners Corporation.
Levan Enterprises, Ltd. is a limited partnership whose sole
general partner is Levan General Corp., a corporation 100% owned
by Mr. Levan. Mr. Levans share ownership also
includes 11,437 shares of BFCs Class A Common
Stock and 1,200 shares of BFCs Class B Common
Stock held of record by his wife and 71,250 shares of
BFCs Class B Common Stock subject to a plan adopted
under Rule 10b5-1 of the Exchange Act. Collectively, the shares
of BFCs Class A Common Stock and Class B Common
Stock beneficially owned by Mr. Levan represent
approximately 38.1% of the total voting power of BFC. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Messrs. Levan and Abdo have agreed to vote their shares of
BFCs Class B Common Stock in favor of the election of
the other to BFCs board of directors for so long as they
are willing and able to serve as directors. Additionally,
Mr. Abdo has agreed, subject to certain exceptions, not to
transfer certain of his shares of BFCs Class B Common
Stock and to obtain the consent of Mr. Levan prior to the
conversion of certain of his shares of BFCs Class B
Common Stock into shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock. |
|
(7) |
|
Includes 75,000 shares of BFCs Class A Common
Stock subject to a plan adopted under
Rule 10b5-1
of the Exchange Act. |
|
(8) |
|
Dr. Wertheims ownership was reported in a Rebuttal of
Control Agreement filed on December 20, 1996 with the
Office of Thrift Supervision (as adjusted for stock splits since
the date of filing). The Rebuttal of Control Agreement indicates
that Dr. Wertheim has no intention to manage or control,
directly or indirectly, BFC. Dr. Wertheims mailing
address is 191 Leucadendra Drive, Coral Gables, Florida 33156. |
|
(9) |
|
Based on the Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on
May 7, 2009, a group consisting of SC Fundamental Value
Fund L.P. and certain of its affiliates have shared voting
and dispositive power over all such shares. The mailing address
of SC Fundamental Value Fund, L.P. and each of the other group
members (other than SC Fundamental Value BVI, Ltd.) is 747 Third
Avenue, 27th Floor, New York, New York 10017. The mailing
address of SC Fundamental Value BVI, Ltd. is
c/o MadisonGrey
Fund Services (Cayman) Ltd., P.O. Box 10290,
Grand Cayman KY1-1003, Cayman Islands. |
|
|
|
(10) |
|
If the merger described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus
is consummated and BFC issues all of the approximately
44.8 million shares of its Class A Common Stock which
it may issue in the merger, then the beneficial share ownership,
directly or indirectly, of each of BFCs directors, each
person who BFC knows to be the holder of more than 5% of
BFCs Class A Common Stock and BFCs directors
and executive officers as of August 3, 2009 as a group will
be as follows (with the number of shares of BFCs
Class A Common Stock excluding, but the calculation of the
percentage ownership of BFCs Class A Common Stock
including, the shares of BFCs Class B Common Stock,
if any, held by each such person): I.R.E. Properties,
Inc. 4,662,927 shares, representing 6.2% of,
BFCs Class A Common Stock; Alan B. Levan
7,312,204 shares, representing 12.2% of, BFCs
Class A Common Stock; John E. Abdo
3,384,271 shares, representing 7.7% of, BFCs
Class A Common Stock; D. Keith Cobb
97,656 shares, representing less than 1% of, BFCs
Class A Common Stock; Oscar Holzmann
164,361 shares, representing less than 1% of, BFCs
Class A Common Stock; Neil Sterling
164,361 shares, representing less than 1% of, BFCs
Class A Common Stock; Dr. Herbert A.
Wertheim 3,968,157 shares, representing 5.3%
of, BFCs Class A Common Stock; SC Fundamental Value
Fund L.P. 3,913,108 shares, representing
4.7% of, BFCs Class A Common Stock; and BFCs
directors and executive officers as of August 3, 2009 as a
group 11,122,853 shares, representing 19.7% of,
BFCs Class A Common Stock. |
157
BFCS
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Certain of the information contained within this
BFCs Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations section has
been derived or excerpted from BFCs Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the SEC on
March 31, 2009, and Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, filed with the SEC on
August 11, 2009. Unless expressly stated to the contrary or
the context otherwise requires, references to we,
us, our, the Company and
BFC within this section refer to BFC Financial
Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Overview
The objective of the following discussion is to provide an
understanding of the financial condition and results of
operations of BFC (and its subsidiaries) for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 and for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.
BFC is a diversified holding company whose major holdings
include controlling interests in BankAtlantic Bancorp and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries and Woodbridge and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries and a noncontrolling interest in Benihana, which
operates Asian-themed restaurant chains in the United States. As
a result of the Companys position as the controlling
shareholder of BankAtlantic Bancorp, BFC is a unitary
savings bank holding company regulated by the OTS.
Historically, BFCs business strategy has been to invest in
and acquire businesses in diverse industries either directly or
through controlled subsidiaries. BFC believes that the best
potential for growth is likely through the growth of the
companies it currently controls and its focus is to provide
overall support for its controlled subsidiaries with a view to
the improved performance of the organization as a whole.
The Companys primary activities relate to managing its
investments. As of June 30, 2009, BFC had total
consolidated assets and liabilities of approximately
$5.8 billion and $5.5 billion, respectively, including
the assets and liabilities of its consolidated subsidiaries, and
equity of approximately $325.9 million, which includes
noncontrolling interests equity of approximately
$229.4 million.
We report our results of operations through five reportable
segments, which are: BFC Activities, BankAtlantic, BankAtlantic
Bancorp Other Operations, Land Division and Woodbridge Other
Operations. The Financial Services division includes
BankAtlantic Bancorps results of operations and consists
of two reportable segments, which are: BankAtlantic and
BankAtlantic Bancorp Other operations. The Real Estate
Development division includes Woodbridges results of
operations and consists of two reportable segments, which are:
Land Division and Woodbridge Other Operations.
As a holding company with controlling positions in BankAtlantic
Bancorp and Woodbridge, BFC is required under generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) to consolidate the
financial results of these companies. As a consequence, the
financial information of both entities is presented on a
consolidated basis in BFCs financial statements. However,
except as otherwise noted, the debts and obligations of
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge are not direct obligations
of BFC and are non-recourse to BFC. Similarly, the assets of
those entities are not available to BFC absent its pro rata
share in a dividend or distribution.
158
BFCs ownership in BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge as
of June 30, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Percent of
|
|
of
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Vote
|
|
BankAtlantic Bancorp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock
|
|
|
2,389,697
|
|
|
|
23.28
|
%
|
|
|
12.34
|
%
|
Class B Common Stock
|
|
|
975,225
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
47.00
|
%
|
Total
|
|
|
3,364,922
|
|
|
|
29.94
|
%
|
|
|
59.34
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodbridge Holdings Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock
|
|
|
3,735,392
|
|
|
|
22.45
|
%
|
|
|
11.90
|
%
|
Class B Common Stock
|
|
|
243,807
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
47.00
|
%
|
Total
|
|
|
3,979,199
|
|
|
|
23.57
|
%
|
|
|
58.90
|
%
|
Forward
Looking Statements
Except for historical information contained herein, the matters
discussed in this document contain forward-looking statements
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and
Section 21E of the Exchange Act of 1934 that involve
substantial risks and uncertainties. When used in this document
and in any documents incorporated by reference herein, the words
anticipate, believe,
estimate, may, intend,
expect and similar expressions identify certain of
such forward-looking statements. Actual results, performance, or
achievements could differ materially from those contemplated,
expressed, or implied by the forward-looking statements
contained herein. These forward-looking statements are based
largely on the expectations of Company and are subject to a
number of risks and uncertainties that are subject to change
based on factors which are, in many instances, beyond the
Companys control. When considering those forward-looking
statements, the reader should keep in mind the risks,
uncertainties and other cautionary statements made in this
document, including those discussed under the heading Risk
Factors. The reader should not place undue reliance on any
forward-looking statement, which speaks only as of the date
made. This document also contains information regarding the past
performance of our investments and the reader should note that
prior or current performance of investments and acquisitions is
not a guarantee or indication of future performance.
Some factors which may affect the accuracy of the
forward-looking statements apply generally to the financial
services, real estate development, resort development and
vacation ownership, and restaurant industries, while other
factors apply directly to us. Risks and uncertainties associated
with BFC include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
the impact of economic, competitive and other factors affecting
the Company and its subsidiaries, and their operations, markets,
products and services;
|
|
|
|
adverse conditions in the stock market, the public debt market
and other capital markets and the impact of such conditions on
the activities of the Company and its subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
the Companys ability to meet its operating needs and
provide for its ongoing operating requirements through its cash
and cash equivalents, and the Companys ability to obtain
additional funds on attractive terms, if at all, if additional
funds are required;
|
|
|
|
the performance of entities in which the Company has made
investments may not be as anticipated;
|
|
|
|
|
|
BFC is dependent upon dividends from its subsidiaries to fund
its operations, and currently BankAtlantic Bancorp and
Woodbridge are not paying dividends and may not pay dividends in
the future, and even if paid, BFC has historically experienced
and may continue to experience negative cash flow;
|
|
|
|
|
|
BFC may need to issue debt or equity securities to fund its
operations, and any such securities may not be issued on
favorable terms, if at all;
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
BFC will be subject to the unique business and industry risks
and characteristics of each entity in which an investment is
made; and
|
|
|
|
BFC shareholders interests may be diluted if additional
shares of BFC common stock are issued and its interests in its
subsidiaries may be diluted if its subsidiaries issue additional
shares of common stock.
|
With respect to BFCs subsidiary, BankAtlantic Bancorp, and
its subsidiary, BankAtlantic, the risks and uncertainties
include those discussed in the Financial Services
subsection below.
With respect to BFCs subsidiary, Woodbridge and its
subsidiaries, the risks and uncertainties include those
discussed in the section of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus entitled Woodbridges
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations.
In addition, reference is also made to other risks and factors
detailed in reports filed by the Company, BankAtlantic Bancorp
and Woodbridge with the SEC. The Company cautions that the
foregoing factors are not exclusive.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Management views critical accounting policies as accounting
policies that are important to the understanding of our
financial statements and also involve estimates and judgments
about inherently uncertain matters. In preparing the financial
statements, management is required to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
as of the dates of the consolidated statements of financial
condition and assumptions that affect the recognition of income
and expenses on the consolidated statements of operations for
the periods presented. Actual results could differ significantly
from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly
susceptible to significant change in subsequent periods relate
to the determination of the allowance for loan losses,
evaluation of goodwill and other intangible assets for
impairment, the valuation of real estate acquired in connection
with foreclosure or in satisfaction of loans, the valuation of
real estate held for development and sale and its impairment
reserves, revenue and cost recognition on percent complete
projects, estimated costs to complete construction, the
valuation of investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries, the
valuation of the fair value of assets and liabilities in the
application of the purchase method of accounting, accounting for
deferred tax asset valuation allowance, accounting for uncertain
tax positions, accounting for contingencies, and assumptions
used in the valuation of stock-based compensation. The
accounting policies that we have identified as critical
accounting policies are: (i) allowance for loan losses;
(ii) valuation of securities as well as the determination
of other-than-temporary declines in value; (iii) impairment
of goodwill and other indefinite life intangible assets;
(iv) impairment of long-lived assets; (v) accounting
for business combinations; (vi) the valuation of real
estate held for development and sale; (vii) the valuation
of unconsolidated subsidiaries; (viii) accounting for
deferred tax asset valuation allowance; (ix) accounting for
contingencies; and (x) accounting for stock-based
compensation. See note 1 of the notes to our audited
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
joint proxy statement/prospectus for a detailed discussion of
our significant accounting policies.
160
Summary
of Consolidated Results of Operations by Segment
The tables below sets forth the Companys summarized
results of operations for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
For the Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
BFC Activities
|
|
$
|
(1,668
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,497
|
|
|
$
|
(3,530
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,316
|
|
Financial Services
|
|
|
(39,325
|
)
|
|
|
(19,363
|
)
|
|
|
(85,333
|
)
|
|
|
(43,927
|
)
|
Real Estate Development
|
|
|
1,467
|
|
|
|
(8,877
|
)
|
|
|
16,104
|
|
|
|
(19,230
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(39,526
|
)
|
|
|
(26,743
|
)
|
|
|
(72,759
|
)
|
|
|
(59,841
|
)
|
Discontinued operations, less income tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,201
|
|
|
|
1,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(39,526
|
)
|
|
|
(26,743
|
)
|
|
|
(68,558
|
)
|
|
|
(58,822
|
)
|
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
26,617
|
|
|
|
21,826
|
|
|
|
45,246
|
|
|
|
48,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to BFC
|
|
|
(12,909
|
)
|
|
|
(4,917
|
)
|
|
|
(23,312
|
)
|
|
|
(10,788
|
)
|
5% Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss allocable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(13,906
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,104
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,687
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,163
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net loss for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009 was $12.9 million and $23.3 million
compared with net loss of $4.9 million and
$10.8 million, respectively, for the same periods in 2008.
Consolidated net loss for the six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008 includes discontinued operations, net of income
taxes, of approximately $4.2 million and $1.0 million,
respectively, associated with Ryan Beck, which BankAtlantic
Bancorp sold to Stifel Financial Corporation during February
2007.
The 5% Preferred Stock dividend represents the dividends paid by
the Company on its 5% Cumulative Preferred Stock.
The table below sets forth the Companys summarized results
of operations for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008
and 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
BFC Activities
|
|
$
|
5,997
|
|
|
|
12,567
|
|
|
|
(5,006
|
)
|
Financial Services
|
|
|
(217,646
|
)
|
|
|
(30,012
|
)
|
|
|
26,879
|
|
Real Estate Development
|
|
|
(133,567
|
)
|
|
|
(234,620
|
)
|
|
|
(9,164
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(345,216
|
)
|
|
|
(252,065
|
)
|
|
|
12,709
|
|
Discontinued operations, less income tax
|
|
|
16,605
|
|
|
|
7,160
|
|
|
|
(10,535
|
)
|
Extraordinary gain, less income tax
|
|
|
9,145
|
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(319,466
|
)
|
|
|
(242,502
|
)
|
|
|
2,174
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(260,567
|
)
|
|
|
(212,043
|
)
|
|
|
4,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to BFC
|
|
$
|
(58,899
|
)
|
|
|
(30,459
|
)
|
|
|
(2,221
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company reported a net loss of $58.9 million in 2008 as
compared to a net loss of $30.5 million in 2007 and a net
loss of $2.2 million in 2006. Results for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 included
$16.6 million income, $7.2 million income and a
$10.5 million loss from discontinued operations net of
income tax, respectively. The results from discontinued
operations related to financial results associated with Ryan
Beck (see note 3 of the notes to our consolidated financial
statement included elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus for additional information). In 2008, the
Company acquired additional shares of BankAtlantic
Bancorps Class A Common Stock in the open market, and
in 2007 the Company acquired additional shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock in Woodbridges
Rights Offering to its
161
shareholders, including the Company. The acquisition of these
shares resulted in negative goodwill (based on the excess of
fair value of acquired net assets over the purchase price of the
shares) of approximately $19.6 million in connection with
the 2008 acquisitions of additional shares of BankAtlantic
Bancorp and $11 million in connection with the 2007
acquisition of additional shares in Woodbridge. After ratably
allocating this negative goodwill to non-current and
non-financial assets, the Company recognized in 2008 and 2007 an
extraordinary gain, net of tax, of $9.1 million and
$2.4 million, respectively.
The results of continuing operations from our business segments
and related matters are discussed below.
Consolidated
Financial Condition
Consolidated
Assets and Liabilities as of June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008
Total assets at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
were $5.8 billion and $6.4 billion, respectively. The
changes in components of total assets between June 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008 are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in cash and cash equivalents of approximately
$7.1 million which was primarily due to:
(i) Woodbridges net decrease in cash and cash
equivalents of $56.6 million, primarily related to cash
used in operations and investments in time deposits of
approximately $40.3 million and (ii) a net decrease in
cash and cash equivalents of $3.3 million at BFC, which
resulted from cash used in operations of approximately
$3.1 million and cash used in financing activities of
$375,000 associated with BFCs 5% Preferred Stock dividend
payment, offset in part by higher cash balances at the Federal
Reserve Bank associated with daily cash management activities at
BankAtlantic;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in Woodbridges restricted cash associated of
approximately $13.4 million mainly associated with the
settlement payment made in connection with the bankruptcy of
Levitt and Sons;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in securities available for sale reflecting
BankAtlantics sale of $190.6 million of its
mortgage-backed securities, as well as repayments associated
with higher residential mortgage refinancings in response to low
historical residential mortgage interest rates during the period;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in BankAtlantics tax certificate balances
primarily due to redemptions and decreased tax certificate
acquisitions compared to prior periods;
|
|
|
|
a decline in BankAtlantics FHLB stock related to lower
FHLB advance borrowings;
|
|
|
|
|
|
higher residential loans held for sale at BankAtlantic primarily
resulting from increased originations associated with
residential mortgage refinancings;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in BankAtlantics loan receivable balances
associated with repayments of residential loans in the normal
course of business combined with a significant decline in loan
purchases and originations;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in BankAtlantics accrued interest receivable
primarily resulting from lower loan balances and a significant
decline in interest rates;
|
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in BankAtlantics real estate owned associated
with commercial real estate and residential loan foreclosures;
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in BankAtlantics goodwill associated with an
$8.5 million impairment charge to goodwill, net of purchase
accounting adjustment in the amount of $0.6 million.
|
The Companys total liabilities at June 30, 2009 were
$5.5 billion compared to $6.0 billion at
December 31, 2008. The changes in components of total
liabilities from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009
are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
increased interest bearing deposit account balances at
BankAtlantic associated with sales efforts and promotions of
higher-yielding interest-bearing checking accounts and increases
in certificates of deposits;
|
|
|
|
|
|
higher non-interest-bearing deposit balances at BankAtlantic
primarily due to increased customer balances in checking
accounts;
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
lower FHLB advances and short-term borrowings at BankAtlantic
due to repayments using proceeds from the sale of securities and
loan repayments and an increase in deposit account balances;
|
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in BankAtlantic Bancorps junior subordinated
debentures due to interest deferrals; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease of $52.9 million associated with
Woodbridges reversal into income of the loss in excess of
investment in Levitt and Sons as a result of the Bankruptcy
Courts approval of the Levitt and Sons bankruptcy
plan.
|
Consolidated
Assets and Liabilities as of December 31, 2008 and
2007
Total assets at December 31, 2008 and 2007 were
$6.4 billion and $7.1 billion, respectively. The
significant changes in components of total assets from
December 31, 2007 to December 31, 2008 are summarized
below:
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in cash and cash equivalents of approximately
$78.8 million was primarily as a result of (i) a net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $9.2 million at
BFC, which resulted primarily from cash used in operations of
approximately $5.8 million and cash used in investing
activities of $2.5 million and (ii) Woodbridges
net decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $80.4 million,
which resulted from cash used in operations of
$32.9 million, cash used in investing activities of
$41.9 million and cash used in financing activities of
$5.6 million. This decrease in cash and cash equivalents
was offset in part by BankAtlantic Bancorps higher cash
and due from depository institution balances resulting from
additional cash at automated teller machines and cash on hand;
|
|
|
|
an increase in BankAtlantic federal funds sold and short term
investments associated with daily treasury management;
|
|
|
|
an increase in Woodbridges restricted cash primarily
related to the funding of the Levitt and Sons Settlement
Agreement, providing collateral for a letter of credit as a
result of a surety bond claim and the establishment of an
interest reserve for one of Cores loan agreements;
|
|
|
|
a decrease in securities available for sale and other financial
instruments reflecting BankAtlantic Bancorps sale of
Stifel common stock, the sale of Stifel warrants and the
liquidation of managed fund equity investments and principal
repayments on agency securities. This decrease in securities
available for sale was offset in part by Woodbridges net
increase of equity securities of $4.3 million (net of
shares sold and impairment charges) relating to its investment
in Office Depot and BFCs net increase in the
reclassification of its investment in Benihana Convertible
Preferred Stock from investment securities which was carried at
cost to investment securities available for sale in accordance
with SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities;
|
|
|
|
a decrease in investment securities at cost primarily resulting
from BankAtlantic Bancorps sale of Stifel common stock and
certain private equity securities and BFCs
reclassification of its investment in Benihana Convertible
Preferred Stock as discussed above;
|
|
|
|
increase in tax certificate balances in BankAtlantic primarily
due to higher Florida tax certificate acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
a decline in BankAtlantic FHLB stock related to lower FHLB
advance borrowings;
|
|
|
|
a decrease in BankAtlantic loan receivable balances associated
with a $43.2 million increase in the allowance for loan
losses as well as lower residential loan balances partially
offset by higher small business, commercial business and home
equity loan balances;
|
|
|
|
lower real estate held for development and sale held by
BankAtlantic associated with impairments and the sale of
inventory of homes at a real estate development. This decrease
in inventory of real estate was partially offset by a net
increase of inventory held by Woodbridge of $14.0 million
primarily associated with the land development activities of the
Land Division;
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in office properties and equipment primarily due to
the sale by BankAtlantic of five central Florida branches to an
unrelated financial institution as well as the disposal of
properties in connection with the on-going consolidation of
back-office facilities, as well as a decrease in Woodbridge
property and equipment due to the sale of three ground lease
parcels and a depreciation adjustment related to the
reclassification into continuing operations of two of
Cores commercial leasing assets previously classified as
discontinued operations;
|
|
|
|
a decrease in BankAtlantics goodwill associated with the
recognition of a $46.6 million goodwill impairment (net of
purchase accounting of $1.7 million);
|
|
|
|
a decrease in deferred tax assets, net due to the establishment
of a deferred tax asset valuation allowance;
|
|
|
|
an increase in other intangible assets primarily associated with
core deposit intangible assets relating to BFCs step
acquisitions in BankAtlantic Bancorp in August 2008 and
December 2008, which increased BFCs economic ownership in
BankAtlantic Bancorp in the aggregate by approximately 6.5%.
Such acquisitions were accounted as step acquisitions under the
purchase method. The increase in other intangible assets was
also due to Woodbridges intangible assets of approximately
$4.3 million associated with its acquisition of shares of
convertible preferred stock of Pizza Fusion; and
|
|
|
|
a decline in other assets primarily resulting from BankAtlantic
Bancorps and Woodbridges receipt of income tax
refunds associated with the carry-back of taxable losses for the
year ended December 31, 2007.
|
The Companys total liabilities at December 31, 2008
were $6.0 billion compared to $6.4 billion at
December 31, 2007. The changes in components of total
liabilities from December 31, 2007 to December 31,
2008 are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
lower non-interest-bearing deposit balances primarily reflecting
the migration of non-interest bearing deposits to
interest-bearing NOW accounts as BankAtlantic promoted higher
interest rate NOW accounts during 2008 in response to greater
competition;
|
|
|
|
a decline in BankAtlantic insured savings and money market
accounts primarily reflecting deposit outflows resulting from
interest rate reductions on higher yield account products as
higher rates from prior periods were discontinued;
|
|
|
|
an increase in BankAtlantics certificate accounts
reflecting higher brokered deposit balances as well as a higher
interest rate certificate account promotion during 2008;
|
|
|
|
lower FHLB advance borrowings at BankAtlantic due to a decline
in total assets and the availability of alternative funding
sources at lower interest rates;
|
|
|
|
higher short-term borrowings at BankAtlantic associated with
funds obtained from the Treasury at lower interest rates than
alternate funding sources;
|
|
|
|
a decrease in Woodbridges notes and mortgage notes payable
primarily due to curtailment payments made in connection with a
development loan collateralized by land in Tradition Hilton
Head, offset in part by draws on lines of credit in
Woodbridges Land Division; and
|
|
|
|
decreases in other liabilities primarily resulting from a
decline at BankAtlantic in accrued interest payable on
borrowings associated with significantly lower interest rates at
period end, as well as a decrease in accrued liabilities at
Woodbridge which was primarily attributable to decreased
severance and construction accruals due to payments made during
the year ended December 31, 2008, partially offset by an
increase in Woodbridges current tax liability of
approximately $2.4 million relating to its FIN 48
liability which was netted against current tax asset in 2007.
|
164
Redeemable
5% Cumulative Preferred Stock
On June 7, 2004, the Board of Directors of the Company
designated 15,000 shares of the preferred stock as 5%
Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (5% Preferred
Stock) and, on June 21, 2004, sold the shares of the
5% Preferred Stock to an investor group in a private offering.
On December 17, 2008, the Company amended its Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation (the Amendment)
to change certain of the previously designated relative rights,
preferences and limitations of the Companys 5% Preferred
Stock.
Effective with the Amendment in December 2008 and in accordance
with Accounting Series Release No. 268 (ASR
268), the Company determined that the 5% Preferred Stock
met the requirements to be re-classified outside of permanent
equity at its fair value at the Amendment date of approximately
$11.0 million into the mezzanine category as Redeemable 5%
Cumulative Preferred Stock at December 31, 2008 in the
Companys Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
The fair value of the 5% Preferred Stock was obtained by using
an income approach by discounting estimated cash flows at a
market discount rate. Prior to the Amendment in December 2008
for all periods presented, the 5% Preferred Stock is presented
in permanent equity at its stated value of approximately
$15.0 million. At December 31, 2008,
$11.0 million has been re-classified as Redeemable 5%
Cumulative Preferred Stock and the remaining amount of
approximately $4.0 million remains classified in Additional
Paid in Capital.
Noncontrolling
Interest
The following table summarizes the noncontrolling interests held
by others in our subsidiaries (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
BankAtlantic Bancorp
|
|
$
|
170,888
|
|
|
|
351,148
|
|
Woodbridge
|
|
|
91,389
|
|
|
|
207,138
|
|
Joint Venture Partnership
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
262,554
|
|
|
|
558,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact of
Inflation
The financial statements and related financial data and notes
presented herein have been prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, which require the measurement of
financial position and operating results in terms of historical
dollars without considering changes in the relative purchasing
power of money over time due to inflation.
The majority of our assets and liabilities are monetary in
nature by virtue of our ownership interest in BankAtlantic
Bancorp. As a result, interest rates have a more significant
impact on our performance than the effects of general price
levels. Although interest rates generally move in the same
direction as inflation, the magnitude of such change varies. The
possible effect of fluctuating interest rates is discussed more
fully above in the section entitled Information About
BFC Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk.
Inflation could have a long-term impact on our real estate
activities because any increase in the cost of land, materials
and labor would result in a need to increase the sales prices of
land which may not be possible. In addition, inflation is often
accompanied by higher interest rates which could have a negative
impact on demand and the costs of financing land development
activities. Rising interest rates as well as increased materials
and labor costs may reduce margins. Our real estate activities,
which primarily consist of the activities of Woodbridge, are
discussed more fully in the sections entitled Information
About Woodbridge Business and
Woodbridges Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
165
New
Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 22 to our unaudited consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus for a discussion of new accounting
pronouncements applicable to the Company and its subsidiaries.
BFC
Activities
The BFC Activities segment includes all of the
operations and all of the assets owned by BFC other than
BankAtlantic Bancorp and its subsidiaries and Woodbridge and its
subsidiaries. Pursuant to the terms of shared service agreements
between BFC, BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge, BFC provides
shared service operations in the areas of human resources, risk
management, investor relations, executive office administration
and other services to BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge.
Additionally, BFC provides certain risk management and
administrative services to Bluegreen. The costs of shared
services are allocated based upon the usage of the respective
services. This segment also includes BFCs overhead
expenses, interest income and dividend income from BFCs
investment in Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock, the
financial results of a venture partnership that BFC controls,
and financial results from our wholly-owned subsidiary, BFC/CCC,
Inc. (formerly known as Cypress Creek Capital, Inc.)
(BFC/CCC).
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge are consolidated in
BFCs financial statements, as described earlier. The
Companys earnings or losses in BankAtlantic Bancorp are
included in our Financial Services division which consists of
two reportable segments, which are: BankAtlantic and
BankAtlantic Bancorp Other Operations. The Companys
earnings and losses in Woodbridge are included in two reportable
segments, which are: Land Division and Woodbridge Other
Operations.
As of each of June 30, 2009 and 2008, BFC had
9 employees dedicated to BFC operations. As of
June 30, 2009 and 2008, BFC had 28 and 29 employees,
respectively, providing shared services to BFC and its
affiliated companies. During the second quarter of 2008,
7 employees previously employed by BFC/CCC became employees
of Woodbridge.
Results
of Operations For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30,
2009 and 2008
The discussion that follows reflects the operations and related
matters of the BFC Activities segment (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
For the Six Months
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2009 vs.
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2009 vs.
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
$
|
256
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
762
|
|
|
|
(247
|
)
|
Securities activities, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
(103
|
)
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
1,009
|
|
|
|
1,208
|
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
|
|
1,918
|
|
|
|
2,897
|
|
|
|
(980
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,265
|
|
|
|
1,653
|
|
|
|
(388
|
)
|
|
|
2,432
|
|
|
|
3,762
|
|
|
|
(1,330
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost and Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee compensation and benefits
|
|
|
2,117
|
|
|
|
2,344
|
|
|
|
(227
|
)
|
|
|
4,313
|
|
|
|
5,504
|
|
|
|
(1,191
|
)
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
799
|
|
|
|
937
|
|
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
|
1,561
|
|
|
|
1,935
|
|
|
|
(374
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,916
|
|
|
|
3,281
|
|
|
|
(365
|
)
|
|
|
5,874
|
|
|
|
7,439
|
|
|
|
(1,565
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity loss from unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(1,668
|
)
|
|
|
(1,683
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(3,530
|
)
|
|
|
(3,730
|
)
|
|
|
200
|
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,180
|
)
|
|
|
3,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,046
|
)
|
|
|
7,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(1,668
|
)
|
|
|
1,497
|
|
|
|
(3,165
|
)
|
|
|
(3,530
|
)
|
|
|
3,316
|
|
|
|
(6,846
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166
The decrease in interest and dividend income during the three
and six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the same
period in 2008 was primarily related to lower interest rates and
lower average cash balances.
In 2008, securities activities of $103,000 related to a gain on
the sale of securities that were owned by a venture partnership
that BFC controls.
The decrease in other income during the six months ended
June 30, 2009 as compared to the same period in 2008
primarily related to BFC/CCCs gain in connection with the
sale of its indirect membership interests in limited liability
companies during the quarter ended March 31, 2008. This
decrease in other income was partially offset by an increase in
shared service revenues recognized by BFC during the 2009
period. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
BFC/CCCs income was approximately $64,000 and
$1.3 million, respectively. During the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, shared service revenue was
approximately $1.7 million and $1.4 million,
respectively. BFC also incurred similar expenses related to
shared service operations during the 2009 and 2008 periods.
The decrease in employee compensation and benefits during the
second quarter of 2009 as compared to the second quarter of 2008
was primarily due to lower stock compensation expense. The
decrease in employee compensation and benefits during the six
months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the same period
in 2008 was primarily due to the transfer of approximately seven
employees to Woodbridge during the quarter ended June 30,
2008, as well as lower incentive bonuses accrual and stock
compensation expense in the 2009 quarter.
The decrease in other expenses during the six months ended
June 30, 2009 compared to the same periods in 2008 was
primarily associated with lower recruiting fees and legal fees.
This decrease was partially offset by an increase in
professional and consulting fees.
BFC Activities provision for income taxes is estimated to
result in an effective tax rate of 0.0% in 2009. The 0.0%
effective tax rate in 2009 is a result of BFC recording a
valuation allowance in September 2008 against its deferred tax
assets (primarily resulting from BFCs net operating loss
(NOLs)) that are not expected to be recovered in the
future. Due to losses in the past and expected taxable losses in
the foreseeable future, BFC may not have sufficient taxable
income of the appropriate character in the future to realize any
portion of the net deferred tax asset.
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, the results of
BFC Activities included the benefit for income taxes associated
with our equity losses in Woodbridge and BankAtlantic Bancorp.
BFCs business strategy is to hold its investment in
BankAtlantic Bancorp indefinitely. Accordingly, based on the
Companys change in intent in 2008 as to the expected
manner of recovery of its investment in BankAtlantic Bancorp,
the Company reversed its deferred tax liability of
$29.3 million during the quarter ended September 30,
2008.
167
Results
of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007
and 2006
The discussion that follows reflects the operations and related
matters of the BFC Activities segment (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2008 Vs.
|
|
|
2007 Vs.
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
$
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
2,374
|
|
|
|
2,292
|
|
|
|
(998
|
)
|
|
|
82
|
|
Securities activities
|
|
|
898
|
|
|
|
1,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(397
|
)
|
|
|
1,295
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
4,955
|
|
|
|
4,977
|
|
|
|
3,680
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
1,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,229
|
|
|
|
8,646
|
|
|
|
5,972
|
|
|
|
(1,417
|
)
|
|
|
2,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost and Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee compensation and benefits
|
|
|
8,793
|
|
|
|
10,932
|
|
|
|
9,407
|
|
|
|
(2,139
|
)
|
|
|
1,525
|
|
Other expenses, net
|
|
|
3,600
|
|
|
|
4,340
|
|
|
|
3,428
|
|
|
|
(740
|
)
|
|
|
912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,393
|
|
|
|
15,272
|
|
|
|
12,835
|
|
|
|
(2,879
|
)
|
|
|
2,437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in loss from unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
Impairment of investment
|
|
|
(3,574
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,574
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(8,890
|
)
|
|
|
(6,704
|
)
|
|
|
(6,863
|
)
|
|
|
(2,186
|
)
|
|
|
159
|
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
(14,887
|
)
|
|
|
(19,271
|
)
|
|
|
(1,857
|
)
|
|
|
4,384
|
|
|
|
(17,414
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
5,997
|
|
|
|
12,567
|
|
|
|
(5,006
|
)
|
|
|
(6,570
|
)
|
|
|
17,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in interest and dividend income during the year
ended December 31, 2008 as compared to 2007 and 2006
resulted from lower cash and cash equivalent balances and lower
average yields on those balances. The increase interest and
dividend income during the year ended December 31, 2007 as
compared to 2006 resulted from interest income earned on higher
cash balances as a consequence of the public offering of equity
consummated in 2007.
Securities activities related to gains on the sale of publicly
traded equity securities, $103,000 of which was realized in 2008
by a venture partnership that BFC controls.
The decrease in other income in 2008 as compared to the same
period in 2007 was primarily due to lower income at BFC/CCC.
This decrease in other income was partially offset with an
increase in shared service income. The increase in other income
in 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006 was primarily due
to higher income from advisory fees earned at BFC/CCC and shared
service income. In 2008, 2007 and 2006, BFC/CCC income was
approximately $1.4 million, $1.7 million and $929,000,
respectively. In 2008, 2007 and 2006, shared service income was
approximately $3.1 million, $2.9 million and
$2.5 million, respectively. BFC also recognized similar
expenses related to shared service operations.
The decrease in employee compensation and benefits in 2008 as
compared to the same period in 2007 was primarily due to the
decline in executive officers incentive bonus of approximately
$913,000, as well as a decline in compensation and benefits of
approximately $1.1 million primarily associated with the
transfer of BFC/CCCs employees to Woodbridge. The increase
in employee compensation and benefits during the year ended
December 31, 2007 as compared to 2006 was primarily due to
increases in i) the level of compensation and additional
employees in BFCs shared service operations,
ii) bonus expense of approximately $390,000 of which
$200,000 related to the completion of certain projects at
BFC/CCC and additional bonuses to executive officers,
iii) stock compensation expense of approximately $308,000
and iv) a provision for severance in the amount of $250,000
due to a restructuring of BFC/CCCs operations. At
December 31, 2008, BFC had 9 employees dedicated to
BFC operations and 29 employees providing shared services
to BFC and the affiliate companies. At December 31, 2007,
BFC had 12 employees dedicated to BFC operations,
11 employees in BFC/CCC, and 25 employees providing
shared services to BFC and the affiliate companies.
168
Other expenses decreased in 2008 as compared to the same period
in 2007 primarily due to a write-off of $619,000 related to the
abandonment of a proposed merger with Woodbridge which was
terminated in August 2007. Other expenses increased in 2007 as
compared to 2006 primarily due to the write-off of the $619,000
proposed merger cost with Woodbridge and increased legal and
professional and consulting fees.
Impairment of investment in 2008 related to BFCs
investment in Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock. During the
quarter ended December 31, 2008, the Company performed an
impairment review of its investment in Benihana Convertible
Preferred Stock to determine if an impairment adjustment was
needed. Based on the evaluation and the review of various
qualitative and quantitative factors, including the decline in
the underlying trading value of Benihanas common stock and
the redemption provisions of the Companys Convertible
Preferred Stock, the Company determined that there was an
other-than-temporary decline of approximately $3.6 million,
and accordingly, the investment was written down to its fair
value of approximately $16.4 million. Concurrent with
managements evaluation of the impairment of this
investment at December 31, 2008, it made the determination
to reclassify this investment from investment securities which
are carried at cost to investment securities available for sale
in accordance with SFAS No. 115, Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.
BFC Activities include the (benefit) provision for income taxes
associated with our equity earnings (losses) in Woodbridge for
the periods ended and the tax effect of our equity earnings
(losses) in BankAtlantic Bancorp. BFCs current business
strategy is to hold its investment in BankAtlantic Bancorp
indefinitely. Accordingly, based on the Companys change in
intent as to the expected manner of recovery of its investment
in BankAtlantic Bancorp, the Company reversed its deferred tax
liability of $29.3 million during the quarter ended
September 30, 2008.
In 2008, a valuation allowance of approximately
$28.3 million was established against BFCs deferred
tax asset primarily resulting from BFCs net operation loss
(NOLs) carryforwards, because based on available
evidence it is more likely than not that this deferred tax asset
will not be realized. For further information, see note 25
to our audited consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
The effective tax rate after taking into consideration
BankAtlantic Bancorps and Woodbridges equity
earnings (losses) was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
BFC Activities loss before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(8,901
|
)
|
|
|
(6,670
|
)
|
|
|
(6,838
|
)
|
Subsidiaries not consolidated for income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity from (loss) earnings in BankAtlantic Bancorp
|
|
|
(56,230
|
)
|
|
|
(7,206
|
)
|
|
|
5,807
|
|
Equity from loss in Woodbridge
|
|
|
(22,261
|
)
|
|
|
(39,622
|
)
|
|
|
(1,519
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(87,392
|
)
|
|
|
(53,498
|
)
|
|
|
(2,550
|
)
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
(14,887
|
)
|
|
|
(19,271
|
)
|
|
|
(1,857
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(72,505
|
)
|
|
|
(34,227
|
)
|
|
|
(693
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
73
|
%
|
The difference between the effective tax rate and the expected
federal income tax rate of 35% during 2008 resulted primarily
from a valuation allowance of our deferred tax assets of
approximately $28.3 million (which also includes the
disallowance of tax benefits associated with current year losses
from BFC Activities), tax benefits not recognized on our equity
losses from BankAtlantic Bancorp because of our new business
strategy as mentioned above and the reversal of our deferred tax
liability of $29.3 million associated with our investment
in BankAtlantic Bancorp as mentioned above.
The difference between the effective tax rate and the expected
federal income tax rate of 35% during 2006 resulted primarily
from tax benefits associated with dividend received deduction of
approximately $894,000 and state tax.
169
Purchase
Accounting
The acquisitions in 2008 and 2007 of additional shares purchased
of BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge, respectively, were
accounted for as step acquisitions under the purchase method of
accounting. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities acquired
were revalued to reflect market values at the respective dates
of acquisition. Accordingly, the discounts and premiums arising
as a result of such revaluation are generally being accreted or
amortized over the remaining life of the assets and liabilities.
The net impact of such accretion, amortization and other
purchase accounting adjustments decreased our consolidated net
loss (i) for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008 by approximately $91,000 and $65,000, respectively,
(ii) for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
by approximately $760,000 and $143,000, respectively, and
(iii) for the year ended December 31, 2008 by
approximately $8.4 million, of which approximately
$4.7 million and $1.7 million was due to the purchase
accounting associated with the investment in Bluegreen and
goodwill, respectively.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources of BFC
The following tables provide cash flow information for the BFC
Activities segment (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
(3,050
|
)
|
|
|
(4,356
|
)
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
672
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(383
|
)
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(3,319
|
)
|
|
|
(4,069
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
9,719
|
|
|
|
18,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
6,400
|
|
|
|
14,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
(5,859
|
)
|
|
|
(3,267
|
)
|
|
|
(2,292
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(2,495
|
)
|
|
|
(31,548
|
)
|
|
|
(1,416
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(825
|
)
|
|
|
35,537
|
|
|
|
(4,922
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(9,179
|
)
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
(8,630
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
18,898
|
|
|
|
18,176
|
|
|
|
26,806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
9,719
|
|
|
|
18,898
|
|
|
|
18,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BFC expects to meet its short-term liquidity requirements
generally through existing cash balances and cash dividends from
Benihana. The Company expects to meet its long-term liquidity
requirements through the foregoing, as well as, if necessary,
long-term secured and unsecured indebtedness, and future
issuances of equity and/or debt securities and the sale of
assets.
The primary sources of funds to the BFC Activities segment for
the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 and the years
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 (without consideration of
BankAtlantic Bancorps or Woodbridges liquidity and
capital resources, which, except as noted, are not available to
BFC) were:
|
|
|
|
|
revenues from shared services activities for affiliated
companies;
|
|
|
|
|
|
dividends from Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock;
|
170
|
|
|
|
|
venture partnership distributions;
|
|
|
|
|
|
revenues from BFC/CCC in 2008; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
dividends from BankAtlantic Bancorp until January 2009.
|
Sources of funds for the years ended December 31, 2008 and
2007 also included proceeds from the sale of equity securities.
Funds were primarily utilized by BFC to:
|
|
|
|
|
pay dividends on its outstanding 5% Preferred Stock;
|
|
|
|
fund its operating and general and administrative expenses,
including shared services costs; and
|
|
|
|
solely with respect to the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007, purchase shares of Woodbridges and BankAtlantic
Bancorps Class A Common Stock;
|
The decrease in cash used in operating activities during the six
months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same period of
2008 primarily resulted from a reduction of operating and
general administrative expenses. Investing activities in 2009
and 2008 primarily related to distributions from unconsolidated
subsidiaries. Financing activities in 2009 and 2008 were
primarily related to the 5% Preferred Stock dividend payments of
$375,000 for each period.
The increase in cash used in operating activities during 2008
compared to 2007 primarily resulted from lower income resulting
from a decline in interest income earned from cash equivalents
and a decline in BFC/CCCs income. This increase in cash
used in operating activities was partially offset by lower
operating and general and administrative expenses. The increase
in cash used in operating activities during 2007 compared to
2006 primarily resulted from higher operating and general
administrative expenses, net of revenues received from BFC/CCC.
The decline in cash used in investing activities during 2008
compared to 2007 was primarily due to the purchase in 2007 of
3,320,543 shares of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock in Woodbridges rights offering (such shares were
subsequently issued to BFC on October 1, 2007) for
approximately $33.2 million, while in 2008 the Company
purchased an aggregate of 723,848 shares of BankAtlantic
Bancorps Class A Common Stock in the open market for
approximately $3.9 million. In 2008, the decline in cash
used in investing activities was partially offset by cash
proceeds received from a venture partnerships distribution
and proceeds received from the sale of its equity securities.
The increase in cash used in investing activities during 2007
compared to 2006 primarily resulted from BFCs purchase of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock in the rights
offering discussed above. This increase in cash used in
investing activities in 2007 was partially offset by cash
provided by the proceeds received from the sale of equity
securities and from the sale of a real estate investment.
The decrease in cash provided by financing activities during
2008 compared to 2007 was primarily associated with BFCs
public offering in July 2007, in which BFC sold
11,500,000 shares of its Class A Common Stock at $3.40
per share pursuant to a registered underwritten public offering.
Net proceeds from the sale of the 11,500,000 shares totaled
approximately $36.2 million, after underwriting discounts,
commissions and offering expenses. BFC primarily used the
proceeds of this offering to participate in Woodbridges
rights offering described above and for general corporate
purposes, including working capital. In 2007, cash provided by
financing activities resulted from net proceeds from BFCs
public offering offset by the payment of dividends on the
Companys 5% Preferred Stock of $750,000. In 2006, cash
used in financing activities resulted from the payment of
approximately $4.2 million of optionees minimum
withholding tax upon the exercise of stock options and the
payment of dividends on the Companys 5% Preferred Stock of
$750,000. BFC accepted shares of Class B Common Stock as
consideration for the exercise price of stock options and for
the payment of optionees minimum withholding taxes related
to options exercised.
On October 24, 2006, the Companys Board of Directors
approved the repurchase of up to 1,750,000 shares of the
Companys Class A Common Stock at an aggregate cost of
no more than $10.0 million. In 2008, the Company
repurchased in the open market an aggregate of
100,000 shares at an average price of
171
$0.54 per share. As a result of these shares repurchases,
1,650,000 shares of the Companys Class A Common
Stock remain available for repurchase under the plan. These
remaining shares may be repurchased in the open market or
through private transactions. The timing and the amount of
repurchases, if any, will depend on market conditions, share
price, trading volume and other factors, and there is no
assurance that the Company will repurchase any or all of the
remaining shares in the future. No termination date was set for
the repurchase program. It is anticipated that any share
repurchases would be funded through existing cash balances.
The Company does not expect to receive cash dividends from
BankAtlantic Bancorp for the foreseeable future.
Woodbridge has not paid any dividends since the first quarter of
2007, and the Company does not anticipate that it will receive
additional dividends from Woodbridge in the foreseeable future.
Any future dividends are subject to approval by
Woodbridges board of directors and will depend upon, among
other factors, Woodbridges results of operations and
financial condition.
Consistent with our existing business and investment strategies
and operational plans, BFC intends to allocate resources within
the consolidated group (including, following the merger with
Woodbridge, the cash currently held at Woodbridge) among
BFCs investments and subsidiaries in a manner which
BFCs board of directors believes to be beneficial to
BFCs shareholders. It is currently anticipated that BFC
will make additional investments in BankAtlantic Bancorp,
whether in BankAtlantic Bancorps previously announced
$100 million rights offering to its shareholders or
otherwise, and may also make additional investments in
Bluegreen, Core Communities or Benihana.
On June 21, 2004, the Company sold all 15,000 issued and
outstanding shares of its 5% Preferred Stock to an investor
group in a private offering. On December 17, 2008, the
Company amended its Articles of Incorporation (the
Amendment) to change certain of the previously
designated relative rights, preferences and limitations of the
Companys 5% Preferred Stock. The Amendment eliminated the
right of the holders of the 5% Preferred Stock to convert their
shares of Preferred Stock into shares of the Companys
Class A Common Stock. The Amendment also requires the
Company to redeem shares of the 5% Preferred Stock with the net
proceeds it receives in the event (i) the Company sells any
of its shares of Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock,
(ii) the Company sells any shares of Benihanas Common
Stock received upon conversion of the Benihanas
Convertible Preferred Stock or (iii) Benihana redeems any
shares of its Convertible Preferred Stock owned by the Company.
Additionally, in the event the Company defaults on its
obligation to make dividend payments on its 5% Preferred Stock,
the Amendment entitles the holders of the 5% Preferred Stock, in
place of the Company, to receive directly from Benihana certain
payments on the shares of Benihanas Convertible Preferred
Stock owned by the Company or on the shares of Benihanas
Common Stock received by the Company upon conversion of
Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock. Effective with the
Amendment, the Company determined that the 5% Preferred Stock
met the requirements to be re-classified outside of permanent
equity at its fair value at the Amendment date of approximately
$11.0 million into the mezzanine category as Redeemable 5%
Cumulative Preferred Stock at December 31, 2008 in the
Companys Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
The 5% Preferred Stock has a stated value of $1,000 per share.
The shares of 5% Preferred Stock may be redeemed at the option
of the Company, from time to time, at redemption prices ranging
from $1,030 per share for the year 2009 to $1,000 per share for
the year 2015 and thereafter. The 5% Preferred Stock liquidation
preference is equal to its stated value of $1,000 per share plus
any accumulated and unpaid dividends or an amount equal to the
applicable redemption price in a voluntary liquidation or
winding up of the Company. Holders of the 5% Preferred Stock
have no voting rights, except as provided by Florida law, and
are entitled to receive, when and as declared by the
Companys Board of Directors, cumulative quarterly cash
dividends on each such share at a rate per annum of 5% of the
stated value from the date of issuance, payable quarterly. Since
June 2004, the Company has paid dividends on the 5% Preferred
Stock of $187,500 on a quarterly basis.
Shares of Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock are
subject to mandatory redemption on July 2, 2014. The date
may be extended by the holders of a majority of the then
outstanding shares of Benihana Preferred Stock to a date no
later than July 2, 2024. The Company owns
800,000 shares of Benihanas Convertible Preferred
Stock that it purchased for $25.00 per share. The Company has
the right to receive cumulative quarterly dividends at an annual
rate equal to 5% or $1.25 per share, payable on the last day of
each calendar
172
quarter. It is anticipated that the Company will continue to
receive approximately $250,000 per quarter in dividends on
Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock.
At June 30, 2009, a wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC had
a 10% interest in a limited partnership as a non-managing
general partner. The partnership owns an office building located
in Boca Raton, Florida. In connection with the purchase of such
office building in March 2006, BFC/CCC guaranteed repayment of a
portion of the non-recourse loan on the property on a joint and
several basis with the managing general partner. BFC/CCCs
maximum exposure under this guarantee agreement is
$6.0 million (which is shared on a joint and several basis
with the managing general partner), representing approximately
26.4% of the current indebtedness of the property, with the
guarantee to be partially reduced in the future based upon the
performance of the property. In July 2009, BFC/CCCs
wholly-owned subsidiary withdrew as partner of the limited
partnership and transferred its 10% interest to another partner.
In return, the partner to whom the interest was assigned agreed
to use its reasonable best efforts to obtain the release of
BFC/CCC from the guarantee, and if the partner is unable to
secure such a release, that partner has agreed to indemnify
BFC/CCCs
wholly-owned subsidiary for any losses that may arise under the
guarantee after the date of the assignment.
A wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC has a 10% interest in a
limited liability company that owns two commercial properties in
Hillsborough County, Florida. In connection with the purchase of
the commercial properties in November 2006, BFC and the
unaffiliated member each guaranteed the payment of up to a
maximum of $5.0 million each for certain environmental
indemnities and specific obligations that are not related to the
financial performance of the assets. BFC and the unaffiliated
member also entered into a cross indemnification agreement which
limits BFCs obligations under the guarantee to acts of BFC
and its affiliates. The BFC guarantee represents approximately
19.3% of the current indebtedness collateralized by the
commercial properties.
A wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC has a 50% limited partner
interest in a limited partnership that has a 10% interest in a
limited liability company that owns an office building in Tampa,
Florida. In connection with the purchase of the office building
by the limited liability company in June 2007, BFC guaranteed
the payment of certain environmental indemnities and specific
obligations that are not related to the financial performance of
the asset up to a maximum of $15.0 million, or
$25.0 million in the event of any petition or involuntary
proceedings under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or similar state
insolvency laws or in the event of any transfers of interests
not in accordance with the loan documents. BFC and the
unaffiliated members also entered into a cross indemnification
agreement which limits BFCs obligations under the
guarantee to acts of BFC and its affiliates.
There were no amounts for the obligations associated with the
above guarantees (including the transaction associated with
BFC/CCCs wholly-owned subsidiarys 10% ownership
interest) recorded in the Companys financial statements
based on the value of the assets collateralizing the
indebtedness, the potential indemnification by unaffiliated
members and the limit of the specific obligations to
non-financial matters.
173
Financial
Services
BFCs Financial Services activities are comprised of the
operations of BankAtlantic Bancorp and its subsidiaries.
BankAtlantic Bancorp presents its results in two reportable
segments and its results of operations are consolidated in BFC
Financial Corporation. The only assets available to BFC
Financial Corporation from BankAtlantic Bancorp are dividends
when and if paid by BankAtlantic Bancorp. BankAtlantic Bancorp
is a separate public company and its management prepared the
following discussion regarding BankAtlantic Bancorp, portions of
which have been excerpted from BankAtlantic Bancorps
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 and Quarterly Report
on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, in each case
previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Accordingly, references to the Company,
we, us or our in this
Financial Services section are references to
BankAtlantic Bancorp and its subsidiaries, and are not
references to BFC Financial Corporation.
The objective of the following discussion is to provide an
understanding of the financial condition and results of
operations of BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries
(the Company, which may also be referred to as
we, us, or our) for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 and the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006. The principal
assets of the Company consist of its ownership in BankAtlantic,
a federal savings bank headquartered in Fort Lauderdale,
Florida, and its subsidiaries (BankAtlantic).
Except for historical information contained herein, the matters
discussed in this document contain forward-looking statements
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of
1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the Exchange Act), that involve substantial
risks and uncertainties. Actual results, performance, or
achievements could differ materially from those contemplated,
expressed, or implied by the forward-looking statements
contained herein. These forward-looking statements are based
largely on the expectations of BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc.
(the Company) and are subject to a number of risks
and uncertainties that are subject to change based on factors
which are, in many instances, beyond the Companys control.
These include, but are not limited to, risks and uncertainties
associated with: the impact of economic, competitive and other
factors affecting the Company and its operations, markets,
products and services, including the impact of the changing
regulatory environment, a continued or deepening recession and
increased unemployment on our business generally, maintaining
BankAtlantics capital ratios in excess of all regulatory
well capitalized levels, as well as the ability of
our borrowers to service their obligations and of our customers
to maintain account balances; credit risks and loan losses, and
the related sufficiency of the allowance for loan losses,
including the impact on the credit quality of our loans
(including those held in the asset workout subsidiary of the
Company) of a sustained downturn in the economy and in the real
estate market and other changes in the real estate markets in
our trade area, and where our collateral is located; the quality
of our real estate based loans including our residential land
acquisition and development loans (including Builder land bank
loans, Land acquisition and development loans and Land
acquisition, development and construction loans) as well as
Commercial land loans, other Commercial real estate loans,
Residential loans and Commercial business loans, and conditions
specifically in those market sectors; the risks of additional
charge-offs, impairments and required increases in our allowance
for loan losses; changes in interest rates and the effects of,
and changes in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws
including their impact on the banks net interest margin;
adverse conditions in the stock market, the public debt market
and other financial and credit markets and the impact of such
conditions on our activities, the value of our assets and on the
ability of our borrowers to service their debt obligations and
maintain account balances; BankAtlantics
seven-day
banking initiatives and other initiatives not resulting in
continued growth of core deposits or increasing average balances
of new deposit accounts or producing results which do not
justify their costs; the success of our expense reduction
initiatives and the ability to achieve additional cost savings;
the impact of periodic valuation testing of goodwill, deferred
tax assets and other assets; and BankAtlantic Bancorps
success at managing the risks involved in the foregoing. Past
performance, actual or estimated new account openings and growth
may not be indicative of future results. In addition to the
risks and factors identified above, reference is also made to
other risks and factors detailed herein and in reports filed by
the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
including the Companys Annual Report
174
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009. The Company cautions
that the foregoing factors are not exclusive.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Management views critical accounting policies as accounting
policies that are important to the understanding of our
financial statements and also involve estimates and judgments
about inherently uncertain matters. In preparing the financial
statements, management is required to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
as of the date of the consolidated statements of financial
condition and assumptions that affect the recognition of income
and expenses on the consolidated statements of operations for
the periods presented. Actual results could differ significantly
from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly
susceptible to significant change in subsequent periods relate
to the determination of the allowance for loan losses,
evaluation of goodwill and other intangible assets for
impairment, the valuation of securities as well as the
determination of
other-than-temporary
declines in value, the valuation of real estate acquired in
connection with foreclosure or in satisfaction of loans, the
amount of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance, accounting
for uncertain tax positions, accounting for contingencies, and
assumptions used in the valuation of stock based compensation.
The four accounting policies that we have identified as critical
accounting policies are: (i) allowance for loan losses;
(ii) valuation of securities as well as the determination
of
other-than-temporary
declines in value; (iii) impairment of goodwill and other
long-lived assets; and (iv) the accounting for deferred tax
asset valuation allowance. For a more detailed discussion of
these critical accounting policies, see Critical
Accounting Policies beginning on page 219.
Consolidated
Results of Operations Three and Six Months Ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008
Loss from continuing operations from each of the Companys
reportable segments was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
BankAtlantic
|
|
$
|
(24,178
|
)
|
|
|
(14,059
|
)
|
|
|
(10,119
|
)
|
Parent Company
|
|
|
(14,178
|
)
|
|
|
(5,304
|
)
|
|
|
(8,874
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(38,356
|
)
|
|
|
(19,363
|
)
|
|
|
(18,993
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to the Same 2008
Period:
The increase in BankAtlantics net loss during the 2009
quarter compared to the same 2008 quarter primarily resulted
from a $9.8 million decline in net interest income,
$5.1 million of lower revenues from service charges on
deposits and a $9.4 million reduction in income tax
benefits. The increase in BankAtlantics net loss was
partially offset by lower non-interest expenses related
primarily to managements expense reduction initiatives.
The substantial decline in net interest income reflects
managements decision to reduce asset balances and
wholesale borrowings in order to improve BankAtlantics
liquidity position and regulatory capital ratios. As a
consequence, BankAtlantics average earnings assets
declined by $639.8 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2009 compared to the same 2008 period. The decline
in revenues from service charges mainly reflects lower customer
overdraft fees recognized during 2009 compared to 2008 due
primarily to an increase in customer average deposit balances
and fewer transaction accounts generating fees during the 2009
quarter compared to the 2008 quarter. BankAtlantic recognized
income tax benefits in the 2008 quarter associated with its net
loss while during the 2009 quarter, BankAtlantic increased its
deferred tax valuation allowance for the income tax benefits
associated with that quarters net loss. BankAtlantic
incurred significantly lower non-interest expenses during the
2009 quarter compared to the same 2008 period. In response to
adverse economic conditions, BankAtlantic during 2008 and the
first six months of 2009, reduced expenses with a view towards
increasing operating efficiencies. These operating expense
initiatives included workforce reductions, consolidation of
certain back-office facilities, sale of five central Florida
stores, renegotiation of vendor contracts, outsourcing of
certain back-office functions and other targeted expense
175
reduction efforts. These expense reductions were partially
offset by higher FDIC insurance premiums, including a
$2.4 million FDIC special assessment in June 2009.
BankAtlantics provision for loan losses was
$36.0 million for the 2009 quarter compared to
$37.8 million for the 2008 quarter. The provision during
2009 primarily related to charge-offs and loan loss reserves
associated with our consumer, residential and commercial real
estate loan portfolios. The 2008 provision mainly resulted from
reserves and charge-offs associated with our commercial
residential loan portfolio.
The increase in the Parent Companys net loss during the
2009 quarter compared to the same 2008 quarter primarily
resulted from an $8.4 million decline in securities
activities, net and a $2.7 million decrease in income tax
benefits partially offset by a $1.9 million decline in the
provision for loan losses and a $0.5 million reduction in
net interest expenses. The lower net interest expense reflects a
decline in interest expense on junior subordinated debentures
associated with a significant decline in the three-month LIBOR
interest rate from June 2008 to June 2009. The lower revenues
from securities activities, net reflect $8.2 million of
realized and unrealized gains on Stifel securities partially
offset by $1.1 million of securities impairments for the
2008 quarter compared to a net loss from securities activities
during the 2009 quarter of $1.4 million from equity
securities impairments. The Parent Company recognized a
$2.7 million income tax benefit in the 2008 quarter while
no income tax benefit was recognized during the 2009 quarter due
to an increase in the deferred tax valuation allowance. The
$1.9 million improvement in the provision for loan losses
reflects lower charge-offs associated with non-performing loans
transferred from BankAtlantic to an asset work-out subsidiary of
the Parent Company in March 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
BankAtlantic
|
|
$
|
(64,767
|
)
|
|
|
(31,040
|
)
|
|
|
(33,727
|
)
|
Parent Company
|
|
|
(20,200
|
)
|
|
|
(12,887
|
)
|
|
|
(7,313
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(84,967
|
)
|
|
|
(43,927
|
)
|
|
|
(41,040
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to the Same 2008
Period:
The increase in BankAtlantics net loss during the 2009
period compared to the same 2008 period primarily resulted from
a $16.1 million decline in net interest income,
$10.5 million of lower revenues from service charges on
deposits and a $20.4 million reduction in income tax
benefits. The increase in BankAtlantics net loss was
partially offset by higher securities gains and lower
non-interest expenses.
The increase in the Parent Companys net loss primarily
resulted from the same items discussed above for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same 2008 period.
176
BankAtlantics
Results of Operations Three and Six Months Ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008
Net
interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Balance Sheet - Yield / Rate Analysis
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Revenue/
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Revenue/
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
4,226,918
|
|
|
|
47,585
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
|
|
$
|
4,470,868
|
|
|
|
61,466
|
|
|
|
5.50
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
702,931
|
|
|
|
9,405
|
|
|
|
5.35
|
|
|
|
1,098,822
|
|
|
|
16,615
|
|
|
|
6.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest earning assets
|
|
|
4,929,849
|
|
|
|
56,990
|
|
|
|
4.62
|
%
|
|
|
5,569,690
|
|
|
|
78,081
|
|
|
|
5.61
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and core deposit intangibles
|
|
|
16,618
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-interest earning assets
|
|
|
324,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
433,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
5,270,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,078,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings
|
|
$
|
451,122
|
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
|
0.35
|
%
|
|
$
|
552,094
|
|
|
|
1,284
|
|
|
|
0.94
|
%
|
NOW
|
|
|
1,159,531
|
|
|
|
1,812
|
|
|
|
0.63
|
|
|
|
941,964
|
|
|
|
1,898
|
|
|
|
0.81
|
|
Money market
|
|
|
412,065
|
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
0.66
|
|
|
|
617,013
|
|
|
|
2,427
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
1,256,299
|
|
|
|
8,651
|
|
|
|
2.76
|
|
|
|
917,133
|
|
|
|
8,899
|
|
|
|
3.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest bearing deposits
|
|
|
3,279,017
|
|
|
|
11,527
|
|
|
|
1.41
|
|
|
|
3,028,204
|
|
|
|
14,508
|
|
|
|
1.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowed funds
|
|
|
65,604
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
166,031
|
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
1.91
|
|
Advances from FHLB
|
|
|
625,254
|
|
|
|
5,082
|
|
|
|
3.26
|
|
|
|
1,389,835
|
|
|
|
12,433
|
|
|
|
3.60
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
22,779
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
4.86
|
|
|
|
26,274
|
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
6.57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest bearing liabilities
|
|
|
3,992,654
|
|
|
|
16,912
|
|
|
|
1.70
|
|
|
|
4,610,344
|
|
|
|
28,158
|
|
|
|
2.46
|
|
Demand deposits
|
|
|
810,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
878,906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing other liabilities
|
|
|
62,835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
4,865,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,535,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
405,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
543,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
5,270,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,078,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income/ net interest spread
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
40,078
|
|
|
|
2.92
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
49,923
|
|
|
|
3.15
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income/interest earning assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.62
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.61
|
%
|
Interest expense/interest earning assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.24
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.58
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to the Same 2008
Period:
The decrease in net interest income primarily resulted from a
significant reduction in earning assets as well as a decline in
the net interest margin. Interest income on earning assets
declined $21.1 million in the 2009 quarter as compared to
the 2008 quarter. The decline was primarily due to lower average
earning assets, the impact that lower interest rates during 2009
had on our loan portfolio average yields and the impact of
increased non-performing assets. The decline in investment
yields resulted primarily from the suspension by the FHLB of its
stock dividend during the third quarter of 2008 and the sale of
mortgage-backed securities that had higher yields than the
existing portfolio. The decline in average earning assets
reflects a management
177
decision to slow the origination and purchase of loans and to
sell agency securities in an effort to enhance liquidity and
improve regulatory capital ratios.
Interest expense on interest bearing liabilities declined by
$11.2 million during the 2009 quarter compared to the 2008
quarter. The decline was primarily due to a significant decline
in wholesale borrowings, lower interest rates and a change in
the mix of liabilities from higher cost FHLB advance borrowings
to lower cost deposits.
The net interest margin declined as yields on average interest
earning assets declined faster than the interest rates on
average interest-bearing liabilities. The interest earning asset
yield declines were primarily due to lower interest rates during
the current period and changes in the earning asset portfolio
mix from higher yielding residential loans and residential
mortgage backed securities to lower yielding commercial and
consumer loans. During the six months ended June 30, 2009,
interest rates on residential mortgage loans were at historical
lows which resulted in increased residential loan refinancings
and the associated early repayments of existing residential
loans during the period. Additionally, BankAtlantic sold
$190.6 million of mortgage backed securities during the six
months ended June 30, 2009. As a consequence, the ratio of
residential loans and residential mortgage-backed securities to
total earning assets changed from 57.2% residential loans and
residential mortgage-backed securities for the 2008 quarter to
51.2% for the 2009 quarter. The lower interest rate environment
during the 2009 quarter had a significant impact on commercial,
small business and consumer loan yields, as a majority of these
loans have adjustable interest rates indexed to prime or LIBOR.
The prime interest rate declined from 5.25% at March 31,
2008 to 3.25% at June 30, 2009, and the average three-month
LIBOR rate declined from 2.78% at June 30, 2008 to 0.60% at
June 30, 2009. Yields on earning assets were also adversely
affected by the discontinuation of FHLB stock dividends.
BankAtlantic received $1.1 million of FHLB stock dividends
during the three months ended June 30, 2008, but received
no dividends during the same 2009 period.
The lower interest rates on interest bearing liabilities
reflects the lower interest rate environment, generally during
2009 compared to 2008 and a change in BankAtlantics
funding mix from higher rate FHLB advances to lower rate
deposits.
The decline in interest bearing deposit rates was partially
offset by a shift in deposit mix to a greater proportion of
higher cost deposits. The increase in certificate accounts
reflects higher average brokered deposit account balances.
Deposits which BankAtlantic receives in connection with its
participation in the CDARS program from other participating
CDARS institutions are included in BankAtlantics financial
statements as brokered deposits. Average brokered deposits
increased from $43.3 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2008 to $232.5 million during the same 2009
period, representing 5.51% of total deposits as of June 30,
2009.
The decline in average non-interest bearing demand deposit
accounts reflects the competitive banking environment in Florida
and the migration of demand deposit accounts to interest-bearing
NOW and certificate of deposit accounts.
178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Balance Sheet - Yield / Rate Analysis
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Revenue/
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Revenue/
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
4,291,012
|
|
|
|
97,191
|
|
|
|
4.53
|
|
|
$
|
4,554,307
|
|
|
|
129,602
|
|
|
|
5.69
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
818,790
|
|
|
|
22,208
|
|
|
|
5.42
|
|
|
|
1,065,268
|
|
|
|
31,837
|
|
|
|
5.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest earning assets
|
|
|
5,109,802
|
|
|
|
119,399
|
|
|
|
4.67
|
%
|
|
|
5,619,575
|
|
|
|
161,439
|
|
|
|
5.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and core deposit intangibles
|
|
|
21,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-interest earning assets
|
|
|
340,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
424,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
5,471,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,119,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings
|
|
$
|
446,227
|
|
|
|
890
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
%
|
|
$
|
559,271
|
|
|
|
3,302
|
|
|
|
1.19
|
|
NOW
|
|
|
1,103,634
|
|
|
|
3,226
|
|
|
|
0.59
|
|
|
|
934,173
|
|
|
|
4,581
|
|
|
|
0.99
|
|
Money market
|
|
|
416,947
|
|
|
|
1,447
|
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
613,038
|
|
|
|
5,585
|
|
|
|
1.83
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
1,278,057
|
|
|
|
18,951
|
|
|
|
2.99
|
|
|
|
954,605
|
|
|
|
19,633
|
|
|
|
4.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
3,244,865
|
|
|
|
24,514
|
|
|
|
1.52
|
|
|
|
3,061,087
|
|
|
|
33,101
|
|
|
|
2.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowed funds
|
|
|
171,319
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
167,386
|
|
|
|
2,113
|
|
|
|
2.54
|
|
Advances from FHLB
|
|
|
763,398
|
|
|
|
12,246
|
|
|
|
3.23
|
|
|
|
1,406,790
|
|
|
|
27,379
|
|
|
|
3.91
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
22,799
|
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
5.17
|
|
|
|
26,365
|
|
|
|
918
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest bearing liabilities
|
|
|
4,202,381
|
|
|
|
37,552
|
|
|
|
1.80
|
|
|
|
4,661,628
|
|
|
|
63,511
|
|
|
|
2.74
|
|
Demand deposits
|
|
|
793,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
866,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing other liabilities
|
|
|
62,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
5,057,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,575,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
413,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
544,142
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
5,471,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,119,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income/net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
interest spread
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
81,847
|
|
|
|
2.87
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
97,928
|
|
|
|
3.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income/interest earning assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.67
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.75
|
|
Interest expense/interest earning assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.19
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to the Same 2008
Period:
The decrease in net interest income primarily resulted from a
significant reduction in earning assets as well as a decline in
the net interest margin. Interest income on earning assets
declined $42.0 million in the 2009 period compared to the
same 2008 period while interest expense on interest bearing
liabilities declined by $26.0 million during the 2009
period compared to the same 2008 period. The decline in net
interest income and the net interest margin for the six months
period resulted primarily from the same items discussed above
for the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the
same 2008 period and secondarily from a $228.3 million
increase in non-performing assets from June 30, 2008 to
June 30, 2009.
179
Asset
Quality
At the indicated dates, BankAtlantics non-performing
assets and potential problem loans (contractually past due
90 days or more, performing impaired loans or troubled debt
restructured loans) were (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
NONPERFORMING ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax certificates
|
|
$
|
3,091
|
|
|
|
1,441
|
|
Loans(3)
|
|
|
295,448
|
|
|
|
208,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonaccrual
|
|
|
298,539
|
|
|
|
209,529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repossessed assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate owned
|
|
|
30,213
|
|
|
|
19,045
|
|
Other repossessed assets
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets, net
|
|
$
|
328,775
|
|
|
|
228,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
156,821
|
|
|
|
125,572
|
|
Allowance for tax certificate losses
|
|
|
7,508
|
|
|
|
6,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowances
|
|
$
|
164,329
|
|
|
|
131,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
POTENTIAL PROBLEM LOANS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractually past due 90 days or more(1)
|
|
$
|
12,654
|
|
|
|
15,721
|
|
Performing impaired loans(2)
|
|
|
83,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
Troubled debt restructured loans
|
|
|
63,057
|
|
|
|
25,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL POTENTIAL PROBLEM LOANS
|
|
$
|
159,323
|
|
|
|
41,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The majority of these loans have matured and the borrowers
continue to make payments under the matured agreements. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
BankAtlantic believes that it will ultimately collect all of the
principal and interest associated with these loans; however, the
timing of the payments may not be in accordance with the
contractual terms of the loan agreement. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Includes $44.8 million and $0 of troubled debt restructured
loans as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively. |
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, real estate
values in markets where our collateral is located continued to
decline and economic conditions deteriorated further. In June
2009, Floridas unemployment rate hit a 33 year high
at 10.6% and the national unemployment rate rose to 9.5%. The
recession and high unemployment is adversely affecting
commercial non-residential real estate markets as consumers and
businesses reduce spending which in turn may cause delinquencies
on loans collateralized by shopping centers, hotels and offices
to significantly increase nationwide. Additionally, the rising
national unemployment has resulted in higher delinquencies and
foreclosures on jumbo residential real estate loans during 2009.
These adverse economic conditions continued to adversely impact
the credit quality of all of BankAtlantics loan products
resulting in higher loan delinquencies, charge-offs and
classified assets. We continued to incur losses in our
commercial residential real estate and consumer home equity loan
portfolios. We also began experiencing higher losses in our
commercial non-residential, residential and small business loan
portfolios as the deteriorating economic environment has
adversely impacted borrowers under these loans. We believe that
if real estate and general economic conditions and unemployment
trends in Florida do not improve, the credit quality of our loan
portfolio will continue to deteriorate and additional provisions
for loan losses may be
180
required in subsequent periods. Additionally, if jumbo
residential loan delinquencies and foreclosures continue to
increase nationwide, we may incur additional provisions for
residential loan losses.
Non-performing assets were substantially higher at June 30,
2009 compared to December 31, 2008 primarily resulting from
higher non-performing loans and real estate owned balances.
The increase in non-accrual tax certificates and the higher
allowance for tax certificate losses primarily resulted from
certain out of state tax certificates purchased in real estate
markets that have deteriorated since the purchase date.
Management believes that these adverse economic conditions in
distressed areas resulted in higher tax certificate
non-performing assets and charge-offs than historical trends.
The higher non-performing loans primarily resulted from a
$48.0 million and a $30.0 million increase in
non-accrual commercial and residential loans, respectively.
Commercial residential loans continue to constitute the majority
of non-performing loans; however, BankAtlantic is experiencing
unfavorable delinquency trends in commercial loans
collateralized by commercial land and retail income producing
properties and may experience higher non-performing loans in
these loan categories in subsequent periods. We believe that the
substantial increase in residential non-accrual loans primarily
reflects the significant increase in the national unemployment
rate during 2009 and the general deterioration in the national
economy and in the residential real estate market as home prices
throughout the country continued to decline. Additionally,
BankAtlantics small business and consumer non-accrual loan
balances increased by $5.1 million and $4.3 million,
respectively.
The increase in real estate owned primarily resulted from two
commercial non-residential loan foreclosures and an increase in
residential real estate loan foreclosures associated with the
residential and home equity loan portfolios.
In response to current market conditions, BankAtlantic has
developed loan modification programs for certain borrowers
experiencing financial difficulties. During the six months ended
June 30, 2009, BankAtlantic modified the terms of various
commercial, small business, residential and home equity loans.
Generally, the concessions made to borrowers experiencing
financial difficulties were the reduction of the loans
contractual interest rate, converting amortizing loans to
interest only payments or the deferral of interest payments to
the maturity date of the loan. BankAtlantic believes that
granting these concessions should improve the performance and
value of these loans. However, management can give no assurance
that the modification of loans in a troubled debt restructuring
will result in increased collections from the borrower.
BankAtlantics troubled debt restructured loans by loan
type were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual
|
|
|
Accruing
|
|
|
Non-accrual
|
|
|
Accruing
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
33,811
|
|
|
|
45,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,843
|
|
Small business
|
|
|
4,159
|
|
|
|
5,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
668
|
|
|
|
9,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
6,137
|
|
|
|
1,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
44,775
|
|
|
|
63,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in the allowance for loan losses at June 30,
2009 compared to December 31, 2008 primarily resulted from
an increase in reserves for consumer and residential loans of
$10.0 million and $16.4 million, respectively,
reflecting the unfavorable delinquency trends and continued
deterioration of key economic indicators during the six months
ended June 30, 2009 as discussed above.
181
Included in the allowance for loan losses as of June 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008 were specific reserves by loan
type as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
32,252
|
|
|
|
29,208
|
|
Small business
|
|
|
435
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
2,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
8,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
43,326
|
|
|
|
29,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate and real estate secured consumer loans
that are 120 days past due are written down to estimated
collateral value less cost to sell. As a consequence of longer
than historical time-frames to foreclose and sell residential
real estate and the rapid decline in residential real estate
values where our collateral is located, BankAtlantic began
performing quarterly impairment evaluations on residential real
estate and real estate secured loans that were written down in
prior periods to determine whether specific reserves were
necessary for further estimated market value declines.
BankAtlantic also may establish specific reserves on loans that
are individually evaluated for impairment (generally commercial
and small business loans).
The activity in BankAtlantics allowance for loan losses
was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
For the Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
146,639
|
|
|
|
83,396
|
|
|
|
125,572
|
|
|
|
94,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
(3,923
|
)
|
|
|
(1,027
|
)
|
|
|
(8,511
|
)
|
|
|
(1,651
|
)
|
Commercial
|
|
|
(10,530
|
)
|
|
|
(14,501
|
)
|
|
|
(16,095
|
)
|
|
|
(55,092
|
)
|
Commercial business
|
|
|
(516
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(516
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
(9,118
|
)
|
|
|
(7,225
|
)
|
|
|
(19,439
|
)
|
|
|
(12,061
|
)
|
Small business
|
|
|
(2,347
|
)
|
|
|
(464
|
)
|
|
|
(5,118
|
)
|
|
|
(1,660
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Charge-offs
|
|
|
(26,434
|
)
|
|
|
(23,217
|
)
|
|
|
(49,679
|
)
|
|
|
(70,464
|
)
|
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
1,453
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (charge-offs)
|
|
|
(25,773
|
)
|
|
|
(22,773
|
)
|
|
|
(48,226
|
)
|
|
|
(69,845
|
)
|
Transfer of specific reserves to Parent Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,440
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
35,955
|
|
|
|
37,801
|
|
|
|
79,475
|
|
|
|
80,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
156,821
|
|
|
|
98,424
|
|
|
|
156,821
|
|
|
|
98,424
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in charge-offs on consumer home equity and
residential loans during the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009 compared to the same 2008 periods was
primarily due to the significant increase in unemployment rates
and declining real estate values. These adverse economic
conditions have affected our borrowers ability to perform
under their loan agreements. The increase in small business
charge-offs during the three and six months ended June 30,
2009 compared to the same 2008 periods, reflects, we believe,
the deteriorating financial condition of our borrowers
businesses caused, in part, by the effect the current recession
has had on consumer spending and the construction industry. The
reduction in commercial loan charge-offs during the periods
reflects lower charge-offs on builder land bank loans, land
acquisition and development loans and land acquisition and
construction loans during the 2009 periods compared to the same
2008 periods.
182
BankAtlantics
Non-Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
For the Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Service charges on deposits
|
|
$
|
19,347
|
|
|
|
24,466
|
|
|
|
(5,119
|
)
|
|
|
38,032
|
|
|
|
48,480
|
|
|
|
(10,448
|
)
|
Other service charges and fees
|
|
|
8,059
|
|
|
|
7,121
|
|
|
|
938
|
|
|
|
15,084
|
|
|
|
14,554
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
Securities activities, net
|
|
|
2,067
|
|
|
|
1,960
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
6,387
|
|
|
|
2,301
|
|
|
|
4,086
|
|
Income from unconsolidated
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
1,260
|
|
|
|
(1,079
|
)
|
subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
|
|
3,034
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
5,957
|
|
|
|
5,686
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income
|
|
$
|
32,776
|
|
|
|
36,728
|
|
|
|
(3,952
|
)
|
|
|
65,641
|
|
|
|
72,281
|
|
|
|
(6,640
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The lower revenues from service charges on deposits during the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the
same 2008 periods primarily resulted from lower overdraft fee
income. This decline in overdraft fee income reflects a decline
in the total number of accounts that generate fees and a
decrease in the frequency of overdrafts per deposit account,
which we believe is the result of the focus on growth in
accounts of higher balance business and retail customers.
Management believes that the frequency of overdrafts per deposit
account will continue to decline during 2009; however, this
decline may be partially offset by a 9% increase in the fees for
overdraft transactions effective March 1, 2009. The
increase in overdraft fees reflects increased costs of
processing and collecting overdrafts, and we believe are in line
with local competition.
The higher other service charges and fees during the three
months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same 2008 period
was primarily due to lower losses from check card operations and
higher incentive fees received from our third party vendor. The
increase in other service charges and fees during the six months
ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same 2008 period was
primarily due to the items discussed above partially offset by a
decline in debit card interchange income based, we believe, on
decreased spending by our customers during the three months
ended March 31, 2009. The interchange transaction volume
remained unchanged for the three months ended June 30, 2009
compared to the same 2008 period.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009,
BankAtlantic sold $41.5 million and $190.6 million of
agency securities available for sale for a $2.0 million and
$6.3 million gain, respectively. The net proceeds of
$197.0 million from the sales were used to pay down FHLB
advance borrowings.
Securities activities, net during the three months ended
June 30, 2008 resulted from a $1.0 million gain on the
sale of MasterCard International common stock acquired during
MasterCards 2006 initial public offering as well as
$0.9 million and $1.3 million, respectively, of gains
during the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 from
the writing of covered call options on agency securities
available for sale.
Income from unconsolidated subsidiaries during the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 represents equity earnings from
a joint venture that engages in accounts receivable factoring.
Income from unconsolidated subsidiaries for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 includes $1.0 million of equity earnings
from a joint venture that was liquidated in January 2008 and
equity earnings from the receivable factoring joint venture.
BankAtlantic liquidated all of its investments in income
producing real estate joint ventures during 2008.
The increase in other non-interest income for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same 2008
periods was primarily the result of higher commissions earned on
the sale of investment products to our customers. This increase
in other non-interest income was partially offset by a decline
in fee income from the outsourcing of our check clearing
operation as lower short-term interest rates reduced our
earnings credit on outstanding checks.
183
BankAtlantics
Non-Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
For the Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Employee compensation and benefits
|
|
$
|
24,985
|
|
|
|
32,118
|
|
|
|
(7,133
|
)
|
|
|
53,063
|
|
|
|
66,361
|
|
|
|
(13,298
|
)
|
Occupancy and equipment
|
|
|
14,842
|
|
|
|
16,171
|
|
|
|
(1,329
|
)
|
|
|
29,752
|
|
|
|
32,554
|
|
|
|
(2,802
|
)
|
Advertising and business promotion
|
|
|
1,846
|
|
|
|
3,564
|
|
|
|
(1,718
|
)
|
|
|
4,627
|
|
|
|
8,425
|
|
|
|
(3,798
|
)
|
Check losses
|
|
|
991
|
|
|
|
2,101
|
|
|
|
(1,110
|
)
|
|
|
1,835
|
|
|
|
4,819
|
|
|
|
(2,984
|
)
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
2,336
|
|
|
|
2,004
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
5,280
|
|
|
|
4,264
|
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
Supplies and postage
|
|
|
991
|
|
|
|
1,281
|
|
|
|
(290
|
)
|
|
|
1,991
|
|
|
|
2,284
|
|
|
|
(293
|
)
|
Telecommunication
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
1,326
|
|
|
|
(746
|
)
|
|
|
1,274
|
|
|
|
2,822
|
|
|
|
(1,548
|
)
|
Cost associated with debt redemption
|
|
|
1,441
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1,440
|
|
|
|
2,032
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2,030
|
|
Restructuring charges and exit activities
|
|
|
1,406
|
|
|
|
5,762
|
|
|
|
(4,356
|
)
|
|
|
3,280
|
|
|
|
5,597
|
|
|
|
(2,317
|
)
|
Provision for tax certificates
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
924
|
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
2,900
|
|
|
|
807
|
|
|
|
2,093
|
|
Impairment of real estate owned
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,124
|
|
FDIC special assessment
|
|
|
2,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,428
|
|
|
|
2,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,428
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7,406
|
|
|
|
6,895
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
14,571
|
|
|
|
12,788
|
|
|
|
1,783
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense
|
|
$
|
61,077
|
|
|
|
72,337
|
|
|
|
(11,260
|
)
|
|
|
132,780
|
|
|
|
140,963
|
|
|
|
(8,183
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The substantial decline in employee compensation and benefits
during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009
compared to the same 2008 periods resulted primarily from a
decline in the workforce, including workforce reductions in
March 2009 and April 2008. In April 2008, BankAtlantics
workforce was reduced by 124 associates or 6%, and in March
2009, BankAtlantics work force was further reduced by 130
associates, or 7%. As a consequence of these workforce
reductions and attrition, the number of full-time equivalent
employees declined from 2,385 at December 31, 2007 to 1,554
at June 30, 2009. The decline in the workforce resulted in
lower employee benefits, payroll taxes, recruitment advertising
and incentive bonuses for the 2009 periods compared to 2008.
Despite the reductions in staff and other expenses, BankAtlantic
continues to operate approximately 65% of its stores
seven-days a
week in support of its ongoing focus on customer service.
The decline in occupancy and equipment during the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same 2008
periods primarily resulted from the consolidation of back-office
facilities and the sale of five central Florida branches to an
unrelated financial institution during 2008. As a consequence of
the branch sale and the reduction in back-office facilities rent
expense declined by $0.3 million, depreciation expense by
$0.7 million and maintenance costs by $0.5 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same
2008 period, respectively. Likewise, during the six months ended
June 30, 2009 compared to the same 2008 period back-office
facilities rent expense declined by $1.0 million,
depreciation expense by $1.1 million and maintenance costs
by $0.9 million.
In response to market conditions for financial institutions,
management decided to substantially reduce its advertising
expenditures during the three and six months ended June 30,
2009 compared to the same 2008 periods.
The lower check losses for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009 compared to the same 2008 periods were
primarily related to more stringent overdraft policies
implemented during 2008 as well as lower volume of new account
growth.
184
The increase in professional fees during the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same 2008
periods reflects higher legal fees mainly associated with loan
modifications, commercial loan work-outs, and tax certificate
activities litigation.
The lower telecommunications costs during the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same 2008
periods primarily resulted from switching to a new vendor on
more favorable terms.
The costs associated with debt redemptions were the result of
prepayment penalties incurred upon the prepayment of
$276.4 million and $526.0 million, respectively, of
FHLB advances during the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009.
The restructuring charge for the three months ended
June 30, 2009 reflects additional impairment charges for
real estate held for sale that was originally acquired for store
expansion. The restructuring charge for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 included one-time termination costs incurred
as a result of the workforce reduction discussed above.
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, BankAtlantic
terminated a lease as part of the consolidation of its back
office facilities, reduced its work force as discussed above and
completed the sale of five Central Florida stores. These actions
resulted in restructuring charges, impairments and exit
activities for the 2008 second quarter of $1.5 million
associated with lease termination costs and fixed asset
impairments, $2.1 million of employee termination benefits
and a $0.5 million loss on the sale of five Central Florida
stores. In addition to the above charges during the three months
ended June 30, 2008, BankAtlantic incurred
$1.9 million of impairments associated with real estate
held for sale that was originally acquired for store expansion.
The significant increase in the provision for tax certificates
losses during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009
compared to the same 2008 periods reflects higher charge-offs
and increases in tax certificate reserves for certain out-of
state certificates acquired in distressed markets.
BankAtlantic tests goodwill for potential impairment annually or
during interim periods if impairment indicators exist. Based on
the results of an interim impairment evaluation, BankAtlantic
recorded an impairment charge of $9.1 million during the
three months ended March 31, 2009. If market conditions do
not improve or deteriorate further, BankAtlantic may recognize
additional goodwill impairment charges in subsequent periods.
In October 2008, the FDIC adopted a restoration plan to restore
its insurance fund to a predefined level. In June 2009, the FDIC
imposed a special assessment on all depository institutions of
five basis points on adjusted total assets. BankAtlantics
portion of the FDIC depository institution special assessment
was estimated at $2.4 million.
The increase in other non-interest expense for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same 2008
periods related to higher deposit insurance premiums and
increased property maintenance costs associated with real estate
owned and non-performing loans. These higher other expenses were
partially offset by lower general operating expenses directly
related to managements expense reduction initiatives.
185
Parent
Company Results of Operations Three and Six Months
Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
For the Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net interest expense
|
|
$
|
(3,807
|
)
|
|
|
(4,324
|
)
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
|
(7,828
|
)
|
|
|
(9,698
|
)
|
|
|
1,870
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(7,539
|
)
|
|
|
(9,446
|
)
|
|
|
1,907
|
|
|
|
(8,296
|
)
|
|
|
(9,446
|
)
|
|
|
1,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest expense after provision
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for loan losses
|
|
|
(11,346
|
)
|
|
|
(13,770
|
)
|
|
|
2,424
|
|
|
|
(16,124
|
)
|
|
|
(19,144
|
)
|
|
|
3,020
|
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
(973
|
)
|
|
|
7,414
|
|
|
|
(8,387
|
)
|
|
|
(513
|
)
|
|
|
2,768
|
|
|
|
(3,281
|
)
|
Non-interest expense
|
|
|
1,859
|
|
|
|
1,666
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
3,563
|
|
|
|
3,341
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(14,178
|
)
|
|
|
(8,022
|
)
|
|
|
(6,156
|
)
|
|
|
(20,200
|
)
|
|
|
(19,717
|
)
|
|
|
(483
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,718
|
)
|
|
|
2,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,830
|
)
|
|
|
6,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent company loss
|
|
$
|
(14,178
|
)
|
|
|
(5,304
|
)
|
|
|
(8,874
|
)
|
|
|
(20,200
|
)
|
|
|
(12,887
|
)
|
|
|
(7,313
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decline in net interest expense during the three and six
month periods ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same 2008
periods primarily resulted from lower average interest rates
during the 2009 periods. Average rates on junior subordinated
debentures decreased from 6.55% and 7.24% during the three and
six months ended June 30, 2008 to 5.39% and 5.49% during
the same 2009 periods reflecting lower LIBOR interest rates
during the 2009 periods compared to the 2008 periods. The
average balances on junior subordinated debentures during the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009 were
$298.2 million and $296.3 million compared to
$294.2 million and $294.2 million, respectively,
during the same periods during 2008. Also included in net
interest expense during the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009 was $162,000 and $234,000, respectively, of
interest income on two performing loans aggregating
$3.4 million. Interest income on loans for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2008 was $117,000 each period.
The decline in non-interest income during the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 was primarily the result of
securities activities. During the three months ended
June 30, 2009, the Parent Company recognized a
$1.4 million other than temporary decline in value of an
investment in an unrelated financial institution. During the six
months ended June 30, 2009, the Parent Company sold
250,233 shares of Stifel common stock received in
connection with the contingent earn-out payment from the sale of
Ryan Beck for a $120,000 gain. During the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008, the Parent Company realized a
$3.7 million gain and $1.0 million loss on the sale of
Stifel common stock and recognized $4.5 million and
$2.6 million of unrealized gains, respectively, from the
change in value of Stifel warrants. The Parent Company also
recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2008 a
$1.1 million other than temporary impairment on a private
equity investment and realized $1.3 million of gains from
the sale of private investment securities.
Non-interest expenses for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 consisted primarily of executive
compensation, investor relation costs and professional fees. The
decline in non-interest expenses during 2009 compared to 2008
mainly resulted from lower incentive compensation for 2009
compared to 2008.
186
In March 2008, BankAtlantic transferred non-performing loans to
a work-out subsidiary of the Parent Company. The composition of
these loans as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial residential real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Builder land loans
|
|
$
|
17,471
|
|
|
|
22,019
|
|
Land acquisition and development
|
|
|
16,685
|
|
|
|
16,759
|
|
Land acquisition, development and construction
|
|
|
24,795
|
|
|
|
29,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial residential real estate
|
|
|
58,951
|
|
|
|
67,941
|
|
Commercial non-residential real estate
|
|
|
5,607
|
|
|
|
11,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accrual loans
|
|
|
64,558
|
|
|
|
79,327
|
|
Allowance for loan losses specific reserves
|
|
|
(15,399
|
)
|
|
|
(11,685
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual loans, net
|
|
|
49,159
|
|
|
|
67,642
|
|
Performing commercial non-residential loans
|
|
|
3,352
|
|
|
|
2,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable, net
|
|
$
|
52,511
|
|
|
|
69,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Parent
Companys work-out subsidiary received $5.0 million
from loan payments and the sale of a foreclosed property,
transferred a $1.0 million loan from non-accrual to
performing and foreclosed on two properties aggregating
$4.1 million.
The activity in the Parent Companys allowance for loan
losses was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
For the Six
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
11,758
|
|
|
|
6,440
|
|
|
|
11,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans charged-off
|
|
|
(3,898
|
)
|
|
|
(8,184
|
)
|
|
|
(4,582
|
)
|
|
|
(8,184
|
)
|
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (charge-offs)
|
|
|
(3,898
|
)
|
|
|
(8,184
|
)
|
|
|
(4,582
|
)
|
|
|
(8,184
|
)
|
Reserves transferred from BankAtlantic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,440
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
7,539
|
|
|
|
9,446
|
|
|
|
8,296
|
|
|
|
9,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
15,399
|
|
|
|
7,702
|
|
|
|
15,399
|
|
|
|
7,702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended June 30, 2009, the Parent
Companys work-out subsidiary foreclosed on two loans
charging the loans down $3.9 million to the loans
collateral fair value less cost to sell. Additionally, during
the three months ended June 30, 2009 the Parent
Companys work-out subsidiary specific valuation allowance
was increased $3.7 million associated with a decline in
collateral values on non-performing loans. During the six months
ended June 30, 2009, the Parent Company foreclosed on three
loans charging the loans down $4.6 million.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the
Parent Company charged-off $8.2 million on non-performing
loans and recognized $1.3 million of specific reserves.
187
Consolidated
Results of Operations Years Ended December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006
Income from continuing operations from each of the
Companys reportable business segments follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
BankAtlantic
|
|
$
|
(166,144
|
)
|
|
|
(19,440
|
)
|
|
|
36,322
|
|
Parent Company
|
|
|
(53,100
|
)
|
|
|
(10,572
|
)
|
|
|
(9,443
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(219,244
|
)
|
|
|
(30,012
|
)
|
|
|
26,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The significant decline in BankAtlantics performance
during the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the
same 2007 period primarily resulted from a $48.3 million
goodwill impairment charge, the establishment of a
$66.9 million deferred tax valuation allowance, a
$64.5 million increase in the provision for loan losses and
a decline in non-interest income. These items were partially
offset by lower non-interest expenses excluding the goodwill
impairment. The goodwill in our community banking and commercial
lending business units was determined to be impaired primarily
due to the on-going downward trends in the financial services
industry affecting the Companys market capitalization and
the continued decline in the credit quality of
BankAtlantics loan portfolio. Based on net losses in
recent years and the uncertainty in the current adverse economic
environment, management considered it prudent to establish a
deferred tax valuation allowance on its entire net deferred tax
asset. BankAtlantic would recognize a benefit for the reversal
of its deferred tax asset valuation allowance if BankAtlantic
generates sufficient taxable income in the future to utilize the
tax benefit related to the net deferred tax assets or as tax
laws may otherwise allow. The substantial increase in
BankAtlantics provision for loan losses for 2008 compared
to 2007 reflects net charge-offs for 2008 of $97.4 million
compared to $20.4 million for 2007 and a $31.6 million
increase in the allowance for loan losses during 2008. The
charge-offs and loan reserve increases were primarily related to
commercial real estate and home equity loans. These categories
of loans have been highly susceptible to declining real estate
values in Florida where the collateral for the loans are
located. The decline in BankAtlantics non-interest income
was primarily due to lower net assessments of overdraft fees.
BankAtlantic non-interest expenses, excluding the goodwill
impairment charge, declined by $31.6 million. During 2008,
in response to an adverse economic conditions, we slowed
BankAtlantics store expansion program, consolidated
certain back-office facilities, sold five central Florida
stores, renegotiated vendor contracts, continued staff
reductions, out-sourced certain back-office functions and
initiated targeted other expense reduction programs.
The significant decline in BankAtlantics earnings during
2007 reflects $70.8 million of provision for loan losses
and $20.9 million of restructuring charges and long-lived
asset impairments. The allowance for loan losses during 2007 was
significantly increased in response to the rapid deterioration
in the Florida residential real estate market and the associated
rapid and substantial increase in non-performing loans and
classified assets. Restructuring charges in 2007 related to
managements decision to slow BankAtlantics retail
network expansion, consolidate its call center operations, and
sell properties or terminate operating leases acquired for store
expansion. Other factors contributing to the 2007 loss were net
interest margin compression and costs associated with opening
new stores. BankAtlantics 2007 net interest income
declined by $20.1 million from 2006 reflecting an increase
in its cost of funds due to growth in higher cost deposit
products and lower yields on earning assets due to a change in
the mix of loan products and increased nonperforming assets.
BankAtlantic opened 15 new stores during 2007 and 13 new stores
during 2006. The opening and operating costs of these new stores
exceeded revenues of these stores during the 2007 period, which
had a negative impact on earnings. BankAtlantics results
during 2007 compared to the same 2006 period were favorably
impacted by lower advertising costs of $15.0 million and
higher retail banking service fees of $13.6 million. During
the fourth quarter of 2006, management decided to reduce
advertising expenditures in response to reduced deposit growth.
The additional service fees primarily resulted from higher
overdraft, interchange and surcharge income from increased
volume of customer transactions.
The increase in the Parent Company segment loss during 2008
compared to 2007 reflects a provision for loan losses of
$24.4 million associated with non-performing loans which
were transferred from BankAtlantic
188
to the Parent Companys asset workout subsidiary in March
2008 as well as the establishment of a $20.9 million
deferred tax valuation allowance. The Parent Company had no
provision for loan losses during the comparable 2007 period as
it held no loans during that period. Additionally, gains from
securities activities declined from $6.1 million during
2007 to a loss of $0.4 million during 2008 as the Parent
Company liquidated its managed fund investment portfolio and
sold its entire investment in Stifel securities acquired by it
in connection with the 2007 sale of Ryan Beck. Parent Company
operating expenses were higher by $4.5 million during 2008
compared to 2007. The increase reflects property management
costs associated with non-performing loans and an increase in
professional fees in 2008 compared to 2007.
The higher Parent Company net loss during 2007 compared to 2006
resulted from a $3.3 million other-than-temporary
impairment charge associated with a private limited partnership
and higher net interest expense due to the issuance of
$30.9 million of junior subordinated debentures. The Parent
Company did not recognize impairment charges during the year
ended December 31, 2006. Parent Company segment operations
were favorably impacted by a significant reduction of
performance based bonuses during 2007 compared to 2006
reflecting the decline in the Companys operating results
for the year ended December 31, 2007.
During 2008, the Parent Company recognized in discontinued
operations $16.6 million of additional proceeds from the
Ryan Beck contingent earn-out payments under the Ryan Beck
merger agreement with Stifel. Included in discontinued
operations during 2007 relating to the Ryan Beck segment was
income of $7.8 million compared to a loss of
$11.5 million during 2006. Ryan Becks 2007 income
reflects a $16.4 million gain from the sale of Ryan Beck to
Stifel partially offset by an $8.6 million loss from
operations during the two months ended February 28, 2007,
the closing date of the sale to Stifel. Ryan Becks 2006
loss resulted from declining retail brokerage revenues and a
significant slow-down in investment banking activities.
BankAtlantics
Results of Operations Years Ended December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006
Summary
The following events over the past several years have had a
significant impact on BankAtlantics business strategies
and results of operations:
In April 2002, BankAtlantic launched its Floridas
Most Convenient Bank initiative which resulted in
significant demand deposit, NOW checking and savings account
growth (we refer to these accounts as core deposit
accounts). Since inception of this campaign, BankAtlantic has
increased core deposit balances 284% from $600 million at
December 31, 2001 to approximately $2.2 billion at
December 31, 2008. These core deposits represented 55% of
BankAtlantics total deposits at December 31, 2008,
compared to 26% of total deposits at December 31, 2001.
In 2004, BankAtlantic announced its de novo store expansion
strategy and had opened 32 stores as of December 31, 2008
in connection with this strategy. BankAtlantics
non-interest expenses substantially increased as a result of
this strategy reflecting the hiring of additional personnel,
increased marketing to support new stores, increased leasing and
operating costs for the new stores and expenditures for
back-office technologies to support a larger institution.
During the fourth quarter of 2005, the growth in core deposits
slowed reflecting rising short-term interest rates and increased
competition among financial institutions. In response to these
market conditions, BankAtlantic significantly increased its
marketing expenditures and continued its new store expansion
program in an effort to sustain core deposit growth. The number
of new core deposit accounts opened increased from 226,000
during 2005 to 270,000 during 2006, while core deposit balances
grew to $2.2 billion at December 31, 2006 from
$2.1 billion at December 31, 2005. In response to
adverse economic conditions and the slowed deposit growth,
BankAtlantic significantly reduced its marketing expenditures
beginning during the fourth quarter of 2006 as part of an
overall effort to reduce its non-interest expenses.
During the latter half of 2007, the real estate markets
deteriorated rapidly throughout the United States, and
particularly in Florida where BankAtlantics commercial and
consumer real estate loans are concentrated. In response to
these market conditions, BankAtlantic established a significant
allowance for loan losses for
189
commercial loans collateralized by residential real estate
property and to a lesser extent home equity consumer loans.
During the fourth quarter of 2007, management decided to slow
BankAtlantics retail network expansion and consolidate
certain back-office facilities in order to reduce the growth of
non-interest expenses.
As economic conditions deteriorated in the latter half of 2007
and during 2008, real estate property values continued to
decline. The adverse economic and real estate market conditions
severely impacted the credit quality of BankAtlantics loan
portfolio. In March 2008, the Parent Company purchased
$101.5 million of non-performing loans from BankAtlantic
and during the year contributed $65 million of capital to
BankAtlantic. During the fourth quarter of 2008, financial and
credit markets deteriorated rapidly, investor confidence in
financial institutions was significantly and adversely affected
and the market capitalization of BankAtlantic Bancorps
Class A common stock declined materially. As
BankAtlantics non-performing loans escalated, additional
loan loss reserves were established, impairments of long-lived
assets were recognized and earnings were adversely affected. As
a consequence of the substantial losses during 2007 and 2008,
the deterioration in the price of the Companys
Class A common stock and the unprecedented economic and
market uncertainty, BankAtlantic recognized a $48.3 million
non-cash goodwill impairment charge and established a
$66.9 million non-cash deferred tax valuation allowance.
The following table is a condensed income statement summarizing
BankAtlantics results of operations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2008 vs
|
|
|
2007 vs
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
193,648
|
|
|
|
199,510
|
|
|
|
219,605
|
|
|
|
(5,862
|
)
|
|
|
(20,095
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(135,383
|
)
|
|
|
(70,842
|
)
|
|
|
(8,574
|
)
|
|
|
(64,541
|
)
|
|
|
(62,268
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
58,265
|
|
|
|
128,668
|
|
|
|
211,031
|
|
|
|
(70,403
|
)
|
|
|
(82,363
|
)
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
137,308
|
|
|
|
144,412
|
|
|
|
131,844
|
|
|
|
(7,104
|
)
|
|
|
12,568
|
|
Non-interest expense
|
|
|
(330,623
|
)
|
|
|
(313,898
|
)
|
|
|
(293,448
|
)
|
|
|
(16,725
|
)
|
|
|
(20,450
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic (loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(135,050
|
)
|
|
|
(40,818
|
)
|
|
|
49,427
|
|
|
|
(94,232
|
)
|
|
|
(90,245
|
)
|
(Provision)/benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
(31,094
|
)
|
|
|
21,378
|
|
|
|
(13,105
|
)
|
|
|
(52,472
|
)
|
|
|
34,483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic net (loss) contribution
|
|
$
|
(166,144
|
)
|
|
|
(19,440
|
)
|
|
|
36,322
|
|
|
|
(146,704
|
)
|
|
|
(55,762
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Interest Income
The following table summarizes net interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Revenue/
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Revenue/
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Revenue/
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars are in thousands)
|
|
|
Interest earning assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans:(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
$
|
2,053,645
|
|
|
|
111,691
|
|
|
|
5.44
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,209,832
|
|
|
|
120,768
|
|
|
|
5.47
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,099,664
|
|
|
|
109,103
|
|
|
|
5.20
|
%
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
1,238,307
|
|
|
|
69,642
|
|
|
|
5.62
|
|
|
|
1,367,095
|
|
|
|
108,931
|
|
|
|
7.97
|
|
|
|
1,530,282
|
|
|
|
128,420
|
|
|
|
8.39
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
743,863
|
|
|
|
33,950
|
|
|
|
4.56
|
|
|
|
650,764
|
|
|
|
47,625
|
|
|
|
7.32
|
|
|
|
558,769
|
|
|
|
41,997
|
|
|
|
7.52
|
|
Commercial business
|
|
|
132,565
|
|
|
|
9,516
|
|
|
|
7.18
|
|
|
|
142,455
|
|
|
|
12,720
|
|
|
|
8.93
|
|
|
|
140,465
|
|
|
|
12,452
|
|
|
|
8.86
|
|
Small business
|
|
|
320,853
|
|
|
|
22,162
|
|
|
|
6.91
|
|
|
|
298,774
|
|
|
|
23,954
|
|
|
|
8.02
|
|
|
|
259,816
|
|
|
|
20,988
|
|
|
|
8.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
4,489,233
|
|
|
|
246,961
|
|
|
|
5.50
|
|
|
|
4,668,920
|
|
|
|
313,998
|
|
|
|
6.73
|
|
|
|
4,588,996
|
|
|
|
312,960
|
|
|
|
6.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax exempt securities(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
328,583
|
|
|
|
19,272
|
|
|
|
5.87
|
|
|
|
396,539
|
|
|
|
23,162
|
|
|
|
5.84
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Revenue/
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Revenue/
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Revenue/
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars are in thousands)
|
|
|
Taxable investment securities(b)
|
|
|
1,078,189
|
|
|
|
65,570
|
|
|
|
6.08
|
|
|
|
689,263
|
|
|
|
42,849
|
|
|
|
6.22
|
|
|
|
618,913
|
|
|
|
36,912
|
|
|
|
5.96
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
44,031
|
|
|
|
754
|
|
|
|
1.71
|
|
|
|
3,638
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
5.36
|
|
|
|
1,824
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
1.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
|
|
|
1,122,220
|
|
|
|
66,324
|
|
|
|
5.91
|
|
|
|
1,021,484
|
|
|
|
62,316
|
|
|
|
6.10
|
|
|
|
1,017,276
|
|
|
|
60,096
|
|
|
|
5.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest earning assets
|
|
|
5,611,453
|
|
|
|
313,285
|
|
|
|
5.58
|
%
|
|
|
5,690,404
|
|
|
|
376,314
|
|
|
|
6.61
|
%
|
|
|
5,606,272
|
|
|
|
373,056
|
|
|
|
6.65
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest earning assets
|
|
|
503,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
510,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
448,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
6,114,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,200,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,054,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings
|
|
$
|
503,464
|
|
|
|
4,994
|
|
|
|
0.99
|
%
|
|
$
|
584,542
|
|
|
|
12,559
|
|
|
|
2.15
|
%
|
|
$
|
369,504
|
|
|
|
2,936
|
|
|
|
0.79
|
%
|
NOW, money funds and checking
|
|
|
1,506,479
|
|
|
|
17,784
|
|
|
|
1.18
|
|
|
|
1,450,960
|
|
|
|
26,031
|
|
|
|
1.79
|
|
|
|
1,502,058
|
|
|
|
20,413
|
|
|
|
1.36
|
|
Certificate accounts
|
|
|
1,088,170
|
|
|
|
41,485
|
|
|
|
3.81
|
|
|
|
992,043
|
|
|
|
45,886
|
|
|
|
4.63
|
|
|
|
868,777
|
|
|
|
35,610
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest bearing deposits
|
|
|
3,098,113
|
|
|
|
64,263
|
|
|
|
2.07
|
|
|
|
3,027,545
|
|
|
|
84,476
|
|
|
|
2.79
|
|
|
|
2,740,339
|
|
|
|
58,959
|
|
|
|
2.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase, federal funds
and other short term borrowings
|
|
|
141,654
|
|
|
|
2,699
|
|
|
|
1.91
|
|
|
|
194,222
|
|
|
|
9,829
|
|
|
|
5.06
|
|
|
|
304,635
|
|
|
|
15,309
|
|
|
|
5.03
|
|
Advances from FHLB
|
|
|
1,417,718
|
|
|
|
50,942
|
|
|
|
3.59
|
|
|
|
1,379,106
|
|
|
|
73,256
|
|
|
|
5.31
|
|
|
|
1,265,772
|
|
|
|
66,492
|
|
|
|
5.25
|
|
Subordinated debentures and notes payable
|
|
|
26,004
|
|
|
|
1,733
|
|
|
|
6.66
|
|
|
|
28,946
|
|
|
|
2,498
|
|
|
|
8.63
|
|
|
|
66,287
|
|
|
|
5,513
|
|
|
|
8.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest bearing liabilities
|
|
|
4,683,489
|
|
|
|
119,637
|
|
|
|
2.55
|
|
|
|
4,629,819
|
|
|
|
170,059
|
|
|
|
3.67
|
|
|
|
4,377,033
|
|
|
|
146,273
|
|
|
|
3.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest bearing liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposit and escrow accounts
|
|
|
828,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
946,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,056,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
50,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest bearing liabilities
|
|
|
879,409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,002,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,117,646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
551,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
568,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
559,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
6,114,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,200,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,054,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income/net interest spread
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193,648
|
|
|
|
3.03
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206,255
|
|
|
|
2.94
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226,683
|
|
|
|
3.31
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax equivalent adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,745
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,107
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized interest from real estate operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
199,510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
219,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income/average interest earning assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.58
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.61
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.65
|
%
|
Interest expense/average interest earning assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax equivalent net interest margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.45
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.62
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.04
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes non-accruing loans. |
|
(b) |
|
Average balances were based on amortized cost. |
|
(c) |
|
The tax equivalent basis is computed using a 35% tax rate. |
For
the Year Ended December 31, 2008 Compared to the Same 2007
Period
The decrease in tax equivalent net interest income primarily
resulted from a 17 basis point decline in the net interest
margin and secondarily from a shift in the deposit mix resulting
in lower non-interest bearing liabilities balances.
The decline in the tax equivalent net interest margin primarily
resulted from a decline in average non-interest bearing demand
deposit balances partially offset by an improvement in the tax
equivalent net interest spread. The increase in the tax
equivalent net interest spread primarily resulted from rates on
interest-bearing liabilities adjusting to the decline in
short-term interest rates faster than interest-earning asset
yields. The majority of our loans adjust to LIBOR or prime
interest rates indices. The average prime interest rate declined
from 8.03% during the year ended December 31, 2007 to 5.08%
during the 2008 year and the average three-month LIBOR rate
declined from 5.04% during the 2007 year to 2.92% during
the 2008 year. The majority of interest-bearing liabilities
adjust to current market rates faster than a significant portion
of our assets, which includes residential loans and
mortgage-backed securities that only adjust periodically to
current market rates. The additional net interest income
associated with the improvement of the net interest spread was
partially offset by average interest bearing liabilities
increasing while average interest-earning assets declined.
Average interest earning assets were $79.0 million lower,
and while overall average interest-bearing liabilities were up
$53.7 million, non-interest bearing demand deposit accounts
were $117.5 million lower. The decline in average
non-interest bearing demand deposit accounts reflects the
competitive banking environment in Florida and the migration of
demand deposit accounts to interest-bearing NOW accounts.
Interest income on earning assets declined $63.0 million
during 2008 as compared to 2007. The decline was primarily due
to the impact that lower interest rates during 2008 had on our
average yields for consumer, commercial and small business
loans. Residential loan yields during 2008 remained at 2007
levels as the majority of our residential loans do not adjust
annually and prepayment speeds slowed, in part we believe, due
to borrowers inability to refinance existing loans at the
current lower interest rates. The decline in taxable securities
yields mainly resulted from the liquidation of our tax exempt
securities portfolio during the fourth quarter of 2007 and
suspension by the FHLB of its stock dividend during the third
quarter of 2008.
In response to the slowing economy and declining real estate
market, we have slowed the origination of commercial real estate
loans and the purchase of residential loans. As a consequence,
average balances in our residential and commercial real estate
loan portfolios declined from $3.6 billion during 2007 to
$3.3 billion during 2008. These declines in loan balances
were partially offset by an increase in our taxable securities,
small business loan and consumer home equity loan average
balances. Aggregate average balances in our consumer home equity
and small business loan portfolios increased due primarily to
fundings on existing lines of credit for home equity loans and
from the origination of small business loans. In response to the
current economic environment, BankAtlantic continues to adhere
to stringent underwriting criteria and anticipates lower growth
in subsequent periods. The higher average taxable securities
balances reflect a $57.5 million increase in tax
certificate average balances as 2008 tax certificate
acquisitions were higher than 2007 acquisitions.
The decline in deposit rates primarily resulted from the lower
interest rate environment during 2008 compared to 2007. The
decline in interest rates generally was offset in part by a
shift in deposit mix from demand deposit accounts to NOW
accounts and from savings to certificate accounts. The decline
in savings account average balances reflects outflows of high
yield savings accounts as certain competitors offered higher
interest rates. The migration from demand deposit accounts to
NOW accounts primarily resulted from a high yield checking
account that we promoted during 2008. The increase in
certificates accounts reflects higher average brokered deposit
account balances as well as high yield certificate account
promotions during 2008.
192
Brokered deposits increased from $14.7 million at
December 31, 2007 to $239.9 million at
December 31, 2008.
Rates on wholesale borrowings during 2008 were significantly
lower than 2007 reflecting a significant decline in the federal
funds rates during 2008. The average federal funds rate declined
from 5.04% during 2007 to 2.09% during 2008. Additionally, we
were able to borrow at historically low interest rates due to
programs implemented by the Treasury to stimulate the economy
through increased fundings to financial institutions.
In order to improve the net interest margin and lower borrowing
costs in subsequent periods, BankAtlantic prepaid
$692 million of FHLB advances during the fourth quarter of
2008. BankAtlantic funded the advance repayments with short term
borrowings that were at significantly lower interest rates than
the repaid advances. Management believes the current
historically low interest rates may have a favorable impact on
BankAtlantics net interest margin; however, increased
competition among financial institutions in our markets and
general unfavorable economic conditions, among other factors,
could offset any declines in wholesale borrowing rates.
For
the Year Ended December 31, 2007 Compared to the Same 2006
Period
The decrease in tax equivalent net interest income primarily
resulted from a 42 basis point decline in the net interest
margin and secondarily from higher interest-bearing liabilities
partially offset by a slight increase in interest-earning assets.
The significant decline in tax equivalent net interest margin
reflects slowed core deposit growth, higher rates on deposit
accounts and wholesale borrowings as well as lower loan yields
during 2007 compared with 2006.
The increase in deposit rates primarily resulted from
competition in our markets for deposits which affected both our
deposit pricing and deposit mix. Our deposit mix shifted
unfavorably from lower cost demand and checking accounts to
higher rate deposit products, and we experienced a gradual
increase in certificate of deposit and money market rates
resulting from the increasingly competitive markets.
Rates on wholesale borrowings during 2007 were higher than 2006
reflecting an inverted yield curve during the majority of 2007
and elevated federal funds borrowing rates during the third
quarter of 2007 associated with the effect that the
sub-prime
liquidity crisis had on capital markets and interest rates. The
Federal Reserve began reducing short term interest rates in
September 2007 resulting in lower wholesale borrowings costs
during the fourth quarter of 2007 compared to the same 2006
period.
The decline in loan yields reflects a change in the loan product
mix to lower yielding residential loans from higher yielding
commercial real estate loans as well as a significant increase
in non-accrual commercial real estate loans. Non-accrual
commercial loans increased to $165.8 million at
December 31, 2007 from zero at December 31, 2006.
Additionally, yields on consumer and small business loans were
lower during the 2007 period primarily resulting from more
recent originations at lower yields than the average yields of
the portfolio.
BankAtlantics average interest earning assets increased
primarily as a result of higher average loan balances. The
increase in average loan balances was due to purchases of
residential loans and the origination of home equity and small
business loans to retail banking customers. These increases in
average loan balances were partially offset by declines in
average commercial real estate loan balances primarily resulting
from lower loan originations due to the down-turn in the Florida
real estate market.
193
The following table summarizes the changes in tax equivalent net
interest income (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Compared to
|
|
|
Compared to
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
Volume(a)
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Volume(a)
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) due to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
(9,885
|
)
|
|
|
(57,152
|
)
|
|
|
(67,037
|
)
|
|
|
5,375
|
|
|
|
(4,337
|
)
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
Tax exempt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,272
|
)
|
|
|
(19,272
|
)
|
|
|
(3,986
|
)
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
(3,890
|
)
|
Taxable investment securities(b)
|
|
|
23,652
|
|
|
|
(931
|
)
|
|
|
22,721
|
|
|
|
4,373
|
|
|
|
1,564
|
|
|
|
5,937
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets
|
|
|
14,459
|
|
|
|
(77,488
|
)
|
|
|
(63,029
|
)
|
|
|
5,859
|
|
|
|
(2,601
|
)
|
|
|
3,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
(804
|
)
|
|
|
(6,761
|
)
|
|
|
(7,565
|
)
|
|
|
4,620
|
|
|
|
5,003
|
|
|
|
9,623
|
|
NOW, money funds, and checking
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
(8,902
|
)
|
|
|
(8,247
|
)
|
|
|
(917
|
)
|
|
|
6,535
|
|
|
|
5,618
|
|
Certificate accounts
|
|
|
3,665
|
|
|
|
(8,066
|
)
|
|
|
(4,401
|
)
|
|
|
5,702
|
|
|
|
4,574
|
|
|
|
10,276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
3,516
|
|
|
|
(23,729
|
)
|
|
|
(20,213
|
)
|
|
|
9,405
|
|
|
|
16,112
|
|
|
|
25,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
(1,002
|
)
|
|
|
(6,128
|
)
|
|
|
(7,130
|
)
|
|
|
(5,588
|
)
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
(5,480
|
)
|
Advances from FHLB
|
|
|
1,387
|
|
|
|
(23,701
|
)
|
|
|
(22,314
|
)
|
|
|
6,020
|
|
|
|
744
|
|
|
|
6,764
|
|
Subordinated debentures
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
(569
|
)
|
|
|
(765
|
)
|
|
|
(3,222
|
)
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
(3,015
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
(30,398
|
)
|
|
|
(30,209
|
)
|
|
|
(2,790
|
)
|
|
|
1,059
|
|
|
|
(1,731
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest bearing liabilities
|
|
|
3,705
|
|
|
|
(54,127
|
)
|
|
|
(50,422
|
)
|
|
|
6,615
|
|
|
|
17,171
|
|
|
|
23,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in tax equivalent interest income
|
|
$
|
10,754
|
|
|
|
(23,361
|
)
|
|
|
(12,607
|
)
|
|
|
(756
|
)
|
|
|
(19,772
|
)
|
|
|
(20,528
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Changes attributable to rate/volume have been allocated to
volume. |
|
(b) |
|
Average balances were based on amortized cost. |
The decline in tax equivalent net interest income during 2008
was largely due to yields on interest earning assets declining
faster than interest rates on interest-bearing liabilities. The
lower yields on total earning assets reduced interest income by
$77.5 million while declines in interest rates on total
interest bearing liabilities reduced interest expense by
$54.1 million. As discussed above, the lower yields on
interest earning assets reflect the effect on our loan portfolio
interest income of the significant decline during 2008 of LIBOR
and prime interest rate indices. The decline in federal funds
rates and the programs implemented by the Treasury to promote
lending by financial institutions significantly lowered
wholesale borrowing interest rates. However, our deposits
interest rate declines were less than our earning asset yield
declines as interest rates on our low cost deposits are not as
sensitive to interest rate changes as our loan portfolio rates
and competition from other financial institutions resulted in
only a gradual decline in certificate account interest rates.
BankAtlantic experienced increases in both interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities during 2007. The higher
interest-earnings assets increased the tax equivalent interest
income by $5.9 million which was more than offset by the
increase in interest-bearing liabilities which increased
interest expense by $6.6 million. The decrease in
interest-earning asset yields reduced interest income by
$2.6 million while the higher rates on interest-bearing
liabilities increased interest expense by $17.2 million. As
discussed above, the lower loan yields primarily reflect a
change in the mix of loans from higher yielding loan products to
lower yielding residential loans and the increase in deposit and
borrowing rates were primarily due to competitive pricing in our
markets, a change in the mix of deposits and higher short term
borrowing rates during 2007 compared to 2006. The combination of
increased cost of funds due to external factors and lower yields
on interest-earnings assets due to declining average balances on
higher yielding loan products had a significant unfavorable
effect on our net interest income.
194
Allowance
for Loan Losses
Changes in the allowance for loan losses were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
94,020
|
|
|
|
43,602
|
|
|
|
41,192
|
|
|
|
46,010
|
|
|
|
45,595
|
|
Charge-offs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate loans
|
|
|
(60,057
|
)
|
|
|
(12,562
|
)
|
|
|
(7,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(645
|
)
|
Small business
|
|
|
(4,886
|
)
|
|
|
(2,554
|
)
|
|
|
(951
|
)
|
|
|
(764
|
)
|
|
|
(238
|
)
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
(28,942
|
)
|
|
|
(7,065
|
)
|
|
|
(681
|
)
|
|
|
(259
|
)
|
|
|
(585
|
)
|
Residential real estate loans
|
|
|
(4,816
|
)
|
|
|
(461
|
)
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
(453
|
)
|
|
|
(582
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing loan products
|
|
|
(98,701
|
)
|
|
|
(22,642
|
)
|
|
|
(8,871
|
)
|
|
|
(1,476
|
)
|
|
|
(2,050
|
)
|
Discontinued loan products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(1,218
|
)
|
|
|
(2,026
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs
|
|
|
(98,701
|
)
|
|
|
(22,642
|
)
|
|
|
(8,905
|
)
|
|
|
(2,694
|
)
|
|
|
(4,076
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business loans
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
536
|
|
Commercial real estate loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
1,471
|
|
|
|
4,052
|
|
Small business
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
566
|
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
418
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
578
|
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
370
|
|
Residential real estate loans
|
|
|
397
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing loan products
|
|
|
1,197
|
|
|
|
1,410
|
|
|
|
2,160
|
|
|
|
2,854
|
|
|
|
5,862
|
|
Discontinued loan products
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
808
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
1,637
|
|
|
|
3,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries
|
|
|
1,310
|
|
|
|
2,218
|
|
|
|
2,741
|
|
|
|
4,491
|
|
|
|
9,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (charge-offs) recoveries
|
|
|
(97,391
|
)
|
|
|
(20,424
|
)
|
|
|
(6,164
|
)
|
|
|
1,797
|
|
|
|
5,524
|
|
Provision for (recovery from) loan losses
|
|
|
135,383
|
|
|
|
70,842
|
|
|
|
8,574
|
|
|
|
(6,615
|
)
|
|
|
(5,109
|
)
|
Transfer specific reserves to Parent Company
|
|
|
(6,440
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
125,572
|
|
|
|
94,020
|
|
|
|
43,602
|
|
|
|
41,192
|
|
|
|
46,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The significant increase in the provision for loan losses for
2007 and 2008 compared to the prior periods resulted primarily
from the rapid decline in real estate values nationally and in
Florida, the substantial downturn in the homebuilding industry
and the deteriorating economic environment during the end of
2007 and throughout 2008. BankAtlantic has a high concentration
of commercial borrowers in the homebuilding industry and the
majority of its residential and consumer home equity loans are
to retail customers. The ability of these retail customers to
repay their loans is adversely affected by rising unemployment
rates. These declines in the value of real estate, which
initially involved primarily residential real estate but is now
being experienced in the commercial non-residential real estate
markets, have exacerbated our credit losses as the underlying
collateral values of our loans have continued to decline
throughout 2007 and 2008. BankAtlantics commercial
borrowers are experiencing difficulties selling real estate
inventory or maintaining current cash flow levels on rental real
estate properties. Also, BankAtlantics home equity and
residential loan customers are facing challenges when attempting
to sell or refinance their homes. In response to these trends,
we have slowed down the purchase of residential loans and
tightened consumer home equity loan underwriting requirements
for new loans and froze certain borrowers home equity loan
commitments where borrowers current credit scores were
significantly lower than at the date of loan origination or
where current collateral values were substantially lower than at
loan origination. Additionally, our non-performing loans and
loan delinquencies trends have steadily worsened throughout 2008
resulting in higher allowances for loan losses for all loan
products. We believe that if real estate market conditions and
the economy in general do not stabilize
195
in Florida and nationally, we would expect an increase in loan
delinquencies and non-accrual loan balances as well as
additional provisions for loan losses in future periods.
The increase in provision for loan losses during 2008 compared
to 2007 was primarily the result of unfavorable trends in our
commercial residential development, consumer home equity and
small business loan portfolios as well as significant
charge-offs in our commercial real estate and consumer home
equity loan portfolios. As a consequence, we increased the
allowance for loan losses for all loan products during 2008. The
majority of the commercial loan charge-offs were associated with
commercial residential development loans; however, during the
latter half of 2008 we began incurring charge-offs and
establishing specific reserves on commercial loans
collateralized by office buildings and retail shopping centers.
Also during 2008 we incurred substantial charge-offs in our home
equity loan portfolio as the current economic recession has
eroded our borrowers ability to service the loans and the
collateral values have continued to decline throughout 2008.
The increase in the provision for loan losses during 2007
compared to 2006 primarily resulted from the rapid deterioration
in the Florida real estate market and the associated rapid
increase in non-performing loans. The $70.8 million
provision for loan losses for the year ended December 31,
2007 includes certain specific reserves associated with
commercial residential development loans placed on non-accrual
during the year ended December 31, 2007. These loans were
all collateral dependent and the specific reserve was
established by estimating the fair value of the collateral less
cost to sell. The remaining increase in the provision for loan
losses during 2007 primarily resulted from an increase in the
allowance for loan losses associated with the commercial
residential development loan portfolio and to a lesser extent
the consumer home equity loan portfolio.
During prior periods we discontinued the origination of
syndication, lease financings and indirect consumer loans and
made major modifications to the underwriting process for small
business loans (collectively, discontinued loan
products.) We experienced net recoveries from discontinued
loan products for each of the years in the five year period
ended December 31, 2008. These discontinued loan products
resulted in significant losses in periods prior to 2003. As a
result of this experience we changed our credit policies to
focus our loan production on collateral based loans.
The table below presents the allocation of the allowance for
loan losses by various loan classifications (Allowance for
Loan Losses), the percent of allowance to each loan
category (ALL to gross loans percent) and the
percentage of loans in each category to gross loans (Loans
to gross loans percent). The allowance shown in the table
should not be interpreted as an indication that charge-offs in
future periods will occur in these amounts or percentages or
that the allowance accurately reflects future charge-off amounts
or trends (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Gross
|
|
|
by
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Gross
|
|
|
by
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Gross
|
|
|
by
|
|
|
|
All
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
All
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
All
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
|
by
|
|
|
in Each
|
|
|
to Gross
|
|
|
by
|
|
|
in Each
|
|
|
to Gross
|
|
|
by
|
|
|
in Each
|
|
|
to Gross
|
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Commercial business
|
|
$
|
3,173
|
|
|
|
2.22
|
%
|
|
|
3.15
|
%
|
|
|
2,668
|
|
|
|
2.04
|
%
|
|
|
2.65
|
%
|
|
|
2,359
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
%
|
|
|
3.07
|
%
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
75,850
|
|
|
|
5.44
|
|
|
|
30.69
|
|
|
|
72,948
|
|
|
|
4.51
|
|
|
|
32.78
|
|
|
|
24,632
|
|
|
|
1.28
|
|
|
|
37.54
|
|
Small business
|
|
|
8,133
|
|
|
|
2.49
|
|
|
|
7.20
|
|
|
|
4,576
|
|
|
|
1.44
|
|
|
|
6.43
|
|
|
|
4,495
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
|
|
|
5.57
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
|
6,034
|
|
|
|
0.31
|
|
|
|
42.56
|
|
|
|
4,177
|
|
|
|
0.19
|
|
|
|
43.82
|
|
|
|
4,242
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
42.33
|
|
Consumer direct
|
|
|
32,382
|
|
|
|
4.35
|
|
|
|
16.40
|
|
|
|
9,651
|
|
|
|
1.37
|
|
|
|
14.32
|
|
|
|
7,874
|
|
|
|
1.34
|
|
|
|
11.49
|
|
Discontinued loan products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assigned
|
|
|
125,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unassigned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
125,572
|
|
|
|
2.76
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
94,020
|
|
|
|
1.90
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
43,602
|
|
|
|
0.85
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Gross
|
|
|
by
|
|
|
|
|
|
to Gross
|
|
|
by
|
|
|
|
All
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
All
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
|
by
|
|
|
in Each
|
|
|
to Gross
|
|
|
by
|
|
|
in Each
|
|
|
to Gross
|
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Commercial business
|
|
$
|
1,988
|
|
|
|
2.30
|
%
|
|
|
1.63
|
%
|
|
|
2,507
|
|
|
|
2.94
|
%
|
|
|
1.59
|
%
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
17,984
|
|
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
|
45.20
|
|
|
|
23,345
|
|
|
|
0.92
|
|
|
|
47.28
|
|
Small business
|
|
|
2,640
|
|
|
|
1.12
|
|
|
|
4.43
|
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
1.26
|
|
|
|
3.55
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
|
2,592
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
38.53
|
|
|
|
2,565
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
38.57
|
|
Consumer direct
|
|
|
6,354
|
|
|
|
1.17
|
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
|
|
4,281
|
|
|
|
0.90
|
|
|
|
8.86
|
|
Discontinued loan products
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
12.92
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
1,431
|
|
|
|
17.27
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assigned
|
|
|
31,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unassigned
|
|
|
9,478
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
9,478
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
41,192
|
|
|
|
0.78
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
46,010
|
|
|
|
0.86
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate loans account for a large portion of the
allowance for loan losses for each of the years in the five year
period ended December 31, 2008. The commercial real estate
loan allowance from December 31, 2004 through December 2005
primarily reflected allowance for loan losses based on increases
or decreases in high balance loans. The increase in the
allowance for commercial real estate loans during 2006 was
associated with a slow-down in the homebuilding industry. The
substantial increase in the commercial real estate allowance for
loan losses during 2007 and 2008 resulted in large part from a
rapid deterioration in the Florida real estate market,
generally, and the significant downturn in the residential real
estate market. During 2008 and 2007, home sales and median home
prices declined significantly on a
year-over-year
basis in all major metropolitan areas in Florida, with
conditions deteriorating rapidly during the fourth quarter of
2008 in response to the overall loss of confidence in the
financial markets. The housing industry is experiencing its
worst downturn in 17 years and market conditions in the
housing industry have continued to worsen throughout 2008 and
into 2009 reflecting, in part, decreased availability of
mortgage financing for residential home buyers, reduced demand
for new construction resulting in a significant over-supply of
housing inventory, and increased foreclosure rates.
Additionally, the allowance for loan losses was also increased
to reflect higher estimated inherit losses in our commercial
non-residential loan portfolio as the current economic recession
and credit market instability have contributed to higher
non-performing loans in this loan product. These loans have
performed better during 2007 and 2008 than commercial
residential development loans as the underlying collateral
associated with these loans are generally income producing.
However, if economic conditions do not improve, there is no
assurance that we will not experience delinquencies and
charge-offs in our commercial non-residential loan portfolio
comparable to the levels experienced during 2007 and 2008 in our
commercial residential development loan portfolios.
There are three categories of loans in our commercial
residential development loan portfolio that have resulted in the
majority of the increase in our commercial real estate allowance
for loan losses. The loan balance in these categories aggregated
$303.7 million at December 31, 2008. These categories
are as follows:
The builder land bank loan category consists of 7
loans and aggregates $62.4 million at December 31,
2008. This category consists of land loans to borrowers who have
or had land purchase option agreements with regional
and/or
national builders. These loans were originally underwritten
based on projected sales of the developed lots to the
builders/option holders, and timely repayment of the loans is
primarily dependent upon the sale of the property pursuant to
the options. If the lots are not sold as originally anticipated,
BankAtlantic anticipates that the borrower may not be in a
position to service the loan, with the likely result being an
increase in nonperforming loans and loan losses in this
category. The number of homebuilders who have publicly announced
that they are, or are contemplating, terminating these options
or seeking bankruptcy protection substantially increases the
risk that the lots will not be acquired as contemplated. Four
loans in this category totaling $40.4 million were on
non-accrual at December 31, 2008.
197
The land acquisition and development loan category
consists of 25 loans and aggregates $165.8 million and
generally consists of loans secured by residential land which is
intended to be developed by the borrower and sold to
homebuilders. These loans are generally underwritten more
stringently than builder land bank loans, as an option agreement
with a regional or national builder did not exist at the
origination date. Three loans in this category totaling
$33.2 million were on non-accrual at December 31, 2008.
The land acquisition, development and construction
loan category consists of 14 loans and aggregates
$75.5 million. This category generally consists of loans
secured by residential land which will be fully developed by the
borrower who may also construct homes on the property. These
loans generally involve property with a longer investment and
development horizon, are guaranteed by the borrower or
individuals
and/or are
secured by additional collateral or equity such that it is
expected that the borrower will have the ability to service the
debt for a longer period of time. Three loans in this category
totaling $18.5 million were on non-accrual at
December 31, 2008.
The allowance for consumer loans has increased for each of the
years in the five year period ended December 31, 2008. This
increase during 2004 through 2006 was largely associated with
the growth in outstanding home equity loans throughout the
period and the change in policy during 2004 to permit higher
loan-to-value
ratio loans based on Beacon scores. The significant increase in
the consumer loan portfolio allowance for loan losses during
2008 compared to 2007 was primarily due to a significant
increase in consumer home equity loan charge-offs, higher
non-performing loans and adverse delinquency trends. Residential
property values in Florida have significantly declined and the
State unemployment rate in Florida has almost doubled from 4.5%
at December 31, 2007 to 8.1% at December 31, 2008. The
increased unemployment rate has resulted in adverse delinquency
trends and declining property values resulted in higher credit
losses and an increased allowance for loan losses.
The increase in the allowance for loan losses for consumer loans
during 2007 compared to 2006 reflects unfavorable home equity
loan delinquency trends, higher non-performing home equity loans
and a significant increase in charge-offs during the fourth
quarter of 2007.
The allowance for residential loan losses increased during 2006
compared to 2005 and 2004 primarily associated with higher loan
balances. During 2007 the allowance was maintained at 2006
levels as the portfolio experienced minimal credit losses and no
adverse delinquency trends. During 2008, as property values
nationwide plummeted and unemployment rates increased, our
residential loan portfolio began experiencing unfavorable
delinquency trends and increased charge-offs. As a consequence
of these adverse trends the residential allowance for loan
losses increased by 44% during 2008 compared to 2007.
The allowance for small business loan losses increased during
2006 compared to 2005 and 2004 primarily associated with higher
loan balances. During 2007 the allowance was maintained at 2006
levels as delinquency trends and credit losses remained at 2006
levels. As economic conditions worsened during the latter half
of 2008, we began experiencing adverse trends and higher credit
losses in our small business loan portfolio. In response to
these adverse trends we increased the small business allowance
for loan losses by 78% at December 31, 2008 compared to
December 31, 2007.
198
Non-performing
Assets and Potential Problem Loans (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
NONPERFORMING ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax certificates
|
|
$
|
1,441
|
|
|
|
2,094
|
|
|
|
632
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
381
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
34,734
|
|
|
|
8,678
|
|
|
|
2,629
|
|
|
|
5,981
|
|
|
|
5,538
|
|
Commercial(2)(3)
|
|
|
161,947
|
|
|
|
165,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
1,067
|
|
Small business
|
|
|
4,644
|
|
|
|
877
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
6,763
|
|
|
|
3,218
|
|
|
|
1,563
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
1,210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accrual assets
|
|
|
209,529
|
|
|
|
180,685
|
|
|
|
5,068
|
|
|
|
7,189
|
|
|
|
8,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate owned
|
|
|
2,285
|
|
|
|
413
|
|
|
|
617
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
Commercial real estate owned
|
|
|
16,500
|
|
|
|
16,763
|
|
|
|
21,130
|
|
|
|
881
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
Small business real estate owned
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total repossessed assets
|
|
|
19,045
|
|
|
|
17,216
|
|
|
|
21,747
|
|
|
|
967
|
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets
|
|
$
|
228,574
|
|
|
|
197,901
|
|
|
|
26,815
|
|
|
|
8,156
|
|
|
|
8,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets as a percentage of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
3.21
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, tax certificates and real estate owned
|
|
|
4.95
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
0.19
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
5,713,690
|
|
|
|
6,161,962
|
|
|
|
6,187,122
|
|
|
|
6,109,330
|
|
|
|
6,044,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LOANS, TAX CERTIFICATES AND NET REAL ESTATE OWNED
|
|
$
|
4,614,892
|
|
|
|
4,823,825
|
|
|
|
4,903,961
|
|
|
|
4,830,268
|
|
|
|
4,771,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
125,572
|
|
|
|
94,020
|
|
|
|
43,602
|
|
|
|
41,192
|
|
|
|
46,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax certificates
|
|
$
|
213,534
|
|
|
|
188,401
|
|
|
|
199,090
|
|
|
|
166,697
|
|
|
|
170,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for tax certificate losses
|
|
$
|
6,064
|
|
|
|
3,289
|
|
|
|
3,699
|
|
|
|
3,271
|
|
|
|
3,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER POTENTIAL PROBLEM LOANS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractually past due 90 days or more(1)
|
|
$
|
15,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performing impaired loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
Restructured loans
|
|
|
25,843
|
|
|
|
2,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL POTENTIAL PROBLEM LOANS
|
|
$
|
41,564
|
|
|
|
2,488
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The majority of these loans have matured and the borrower
continues to make payments under the matured loan agreement. |
|
(2) |
|
$121.9 million of impaired loans had specific reserves of
$29.2 million and no additional specific reserves were
determined to be required on the remaining impaired loans. |
|
(3) |
|
Excluded from the above table as of December 31, 2008 were
$79.3 million of residential commercial loans that were
transferred to a work-out subsidiary of the Parent Company in
March 2008. |
Non-performing assets were substantially higher at
December 31, 2008 and 2007 compared to the prior three
years. The large increase reflects higher non-accrual assets.
The increase in non-performing assets during 2006 compared to
2005 and 2004 resulted from a repossessed commercial real estate
property during 2006. The property was further impaired by
$7.2 million during 2007.
199
The increase in non-accrual assets at December 31, 2008
compared to December 2007 primarily resulted from higher
non-accrual loan balances for residential, consumer-home equity
and small business loans. The increase in residential
non-accrual loans reflects the general deterioration in the
national economy and the residential real estate market as home
prices throughout the country continued to decline and it is
taking longer than historical time-frames to foreclose on and
sell homes.
During 2008, BankAtlantic experienced higher delinquencies and
non-accrual trends for small business loans. Management believes
that these trends reflect the deteriorating economic environment
generally and in Florida in particular.
Commercial non-accrual loans at December 31, 2008 remained
at December 31, 2007 levels as BankAtlantic moved
$203.6 million of loans to non-accrual, offset by
$101.5 million of non-accrual loans transferred to a
work-out subsidiary of the Parent Company as well as charge-offs
and loan repayments during 2008. These loans were mainly
commercial residential development loans identified in the high
exposure loan categories.
The substantial increase in non-accrual assets at
December 31, 2007 compared to the three prior year periods
primarily resulted from placing $151.0 million of
commercial residential development loans on non-accrual during
the year ended December 31, 2007. Consumer home equity and
residential non-accrual loan balances also increased compared to
prior periods.
During the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
BankAtlantic modified the terms of certain commercial loans in a
troubled debt restructuring based on the financial
difficulties of the borrowers. The original terms were modified
to reduce the cash payments in order to lessen the near term
cash requirements of the borrowers obligations. While
there is no assurance this will be the case, BankAtlantic
currently expects to collect all principal and interest on these
loans based on the modified loan terms.
In the event of a sustained decline in real estate markets, and
residential real estate in particular, and a slowdown in the
economy in general, we may experience further deterioration in
the credit quality/performance of our loan portfolio. As a
consequence, if conditions do not improve, the residential real
estate market declines further, or commercial non-residential
real estate markets decline, we will experience an increasing
amount of non-performing assets.
Non-Interest
Income
The following table summarizes the significant components of and
changes in non-interest income (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2008 vs
|
|
|
2007 vs
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Service charges on deposits
|
|
$
|
93,905
|
|
|
|
102,639
|
|
|
|
90,472
|
|
|
|
(8,734
|
)
|
|
|
12,167
|
|
Other service charges and fees
|
|
|
28,959
|
|
|
|
28,950
|
|
|
|
27,542
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
1,408
|
|
Securities activities, net
|
|
|
2,395
|
|
|
|
2,307
|
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
Income from unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
|
|
1,219
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
1,186
|
|
Gains associated with debt redemption
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,528
|
)
|
(Losses) gains on dispositions of office properties and
equipment, net
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
(1,121
|
)
|
|
|
1,627
|
|
|
|
908
|
|
|
|
(2,748
|
)
|
Gains on sales of loans
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
680
|
|
|
|
(229
|
)
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
10,488
|
|
|
|
9,924
|
|
|
|
9,305
|
|
|
|
564
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income
|
|
$
|
137,308
|
|
|
|
144,412
|
|
|
|
131,844
|
|
|
|
(7,104
|
)
|
|
|
12,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The lower revenue from service charges on deposits during 2008
compared to 2007 was primarily due to lower overdraft fee
income. This decline in overdraft fees primarily resulted from
lower net overdraft assessments and more stringent criteria for
allowing customer overdrafts in response to increasing check
200
losses. Also contributing to reduce fee income was a decline in
new deposit account openings resulting, in part, from a
management decision to reduce overall marketing and advertising
expenses and the competitive deposit gathering environment.
BankAtlantic has implemented an overdraft fee increase effective
March 1, 2009 to cover increasing costs of processing and
collecting overdrafts.
The higher revenue from service charges on deposits for 2007
compared to 2006 primarily resulted from growth in overdraft fee
income. Management believes that the increase in overdraft fee
income resulted from an increase in the number of deposit
accounts, a 7% increase in the amount charged for overdrafts
beginning July 2006 and a change in policy during 2006 allowing
certain customers to incur debit card overdrafts.
Other service charges and fees during 2008 remained at 2007
levels as higher ATM fees from cruise ships was offset by lower
debit card transaction volume. Also, the decline in the number
of new deposit account openings during 2008 had the effect of
lowering service charge fees. We anticipate that the transaction
volume may continue to decline if current economic conditions do
not improve or if the number of
point-of-sale
transactions declines.
The increase in other service charges and fees during 2007
compared to 2006 was primarily due to higher interchange and
surcharge income associated with an increased volume of customer
transactions. The increase in service card fees during 2007 was
partially offset by the elimination of check card annual fees as
of January 1, 2007 in response to competitive market
conditions. The higher interchange volume reflects a substantial
increase in the number of debit cards issued associated with the
opening of new accounts.
Securities activities, net during the year ended
December 31, 2008 includes $1.0 million of gains from
the sales of MasterCard International stock obtained in
MasterCards initial public offering in September 2006.
Additionally, BankAtlantic sold $210.4 million of agency
securities and realized gains of $0.9 million. The agency
securities were sold to increase the average maturities of the
investment portfolio in response to changes in the interest rate
environment. BankAtlantic also recognized gains of
$0.4 million in connection with the execution of covered
calls on its agency securities portfolio.
Securities activities, net during the year ended
December 31, 2007 includes $3.4 million of gains from
the sales of MasterCard International stock. This gain was
partially offset by $1.6 million of realized losses from
the sale of $399.2 million of municipal securities and
$105.8 million of agency securities available for sale. The
municipal securities were sold because the lower tax-free
returns on these securities were not beneficial to the Company
in light of the losses incurred during 2007 and the agency
securities were sold in response to changes in market interest
rates and related changes in the securities prepayment
risk.
Securities activities, net during the year ended
December 31, 2006 resulted from $458,000 of proceeds
received in connection with the MasterCard International initial
public offering and a $172,000 net gain realized from the
sale of agency securities.
Income from unconsolidated subsidiaries for 2008 and 2007
represents $1.0 million and $1.6 million,
respectively, of equity earnings from joint ventures that manage
income producing rental real estate properties and
$0.5 million and $0.2 million, respectively, of equity
earnings in a joint venture that factors receivables.
Gains associated with debt redemption for 2006 were the result
of gains realized on the prepayment of FHLB advances.
BankAtlantic prepaid these advances as part of a strategy to
reduce the net effect of an asset sensitive portfolio on its net
interest margin by shortening the average maturity of its
outstanding interest-bearing liabilities.
Loss on the disposition of property and equipment during the
year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 primarily represents
the write-off of leasehold improvements associated with the
relocation of stores and the consolidation of back-office
facilities. Gain on sale of bank facilities during the year
ended December 31, 2006 primarily resulted from an exchange
of branch facilities with another financial institution. The
financial institution had a surplus branch facility from a
recent acquisition and BankAtlantic was searching for a suitable
branch site in that general location. As consideration for this
surplus branch, BankAtlantic exchanged a branch with the
financial institution and recorded a $1.8 million gain
equal to the appraised value of the branch transferred less its
carrying value.
201
Gains on loan sales during each of the years in the three year
period ended December 31, 2008 were primarily from the sale
of residential loans originated with the assistance of
independent mortgage brokers and the sale of Community
Reinvestment Act qualified loans to other financial institutions.
The increase in other non-interest income for 2008 compared to
2007 was primarily the result of $1.4 million of higher
commissions earned on the sale of investment products to our
customers. This increase in other non-interest income was
partially offset by a $1.1 million decline in fee income
from the outsourcing of our check clearing operation as
historically low short-term interest rates reduced our earnings
credit on outstanding checks.
The decline in other non-interest income for the year ended
December 31, 2007 compared to the same 2006 period reflects
a $0.4 million deposit forfeited during 2006 by a potential
buyer of a portion of BankAtlantics old corporate
headquarters property. Additionally, corporate overhead fees
received from BFC were $0.2 million lower during 2007
compared to 2006.
Non-Interest
Expense
The following table summarizes the significant components and
changes in non-interest expense (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2008 vs
|
|
|
2007 vs
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Employee compensation and benefits
|
|
$
|
125,851
|
|
|
|
148,758
|
|
|
|
146,099
|
|
|
|
(22,907
|
)
|
|
|
2,659
|
|
Occupancy and equipment
|
|
|
64,774
|
|
|
|
65,840
|
|
|
|
57,291
|
|
|
|
(1,066
|
)
|
|
|
8,549
|
|
Advertising and promotion
|
|
|
16,056
|
|
|
|
19,684
|
|
|
|
34,659
|
|
|
|
(3,628
|
)
|
|
|
(14,975
|
)
|
Check losses
|
|
|
8,767
|
|
|
|
11,476
|
|
|
|
8,615
|
|
|
|
(2,709
|
)
|
|
|
2,861
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
10,979
|
|
|
|
8,266
|
|
|
|
7,653
|
|
|
|
2,713
|
|
|
|
613
|
|
Supplies and postage
|
|
|
4,580
|
|
|
|
6,078
|
|
|
|
6,833
|
|
|
|
(1,498
|
)
|
|
|
(755
|
)
|
Telecommunication
|
|
|
4,430
|
|
|
|
5,552
|
|
|
|
4,774
|
|
|
|
(1,122
|
)
|
|
|
778
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
1,359
|
|
|
|
1,437
|
|
|
|
1,561
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
Cost associated with debt redemption
|
|
|
1,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
|
|
1,238
|
|
|
|
(1,457
|
)
|
Provision for tax certificates
|
|
|
7,286
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
6,986
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges, impairments and exit activities
|
|
|
7,395
|
|
|
|
8,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(956
|
)
|
|
|
8,351
|
|
Impairment of real estate held for sale
|
|
|
1,169
|
|
|
|
5,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,071
|
)
|
|
|
5,240
|
|
Impairment of real estate owned
|
|
|
1,465
|
|
|
|
7,299
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(5,834
|
)
|
|
|
7,290
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
48,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
26,990
|
|
|
|
25,617
|
|
|
|
24,197
|
|
|
|
1,373
|
|
|
|
1,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expense
|
|
$
|
330,623
|
|
|
|
313,898
|
|
|
|
293,448
|
|
|
|
16,725
|
|
|
|
20,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantics non-interest expense for 2008, excluding
$59.6 million of impairments, restructuring charges and
costs associated with debt redemptions, was $271.1 million
compared to $293.0 million and $292.0 million during
2007 and 2006, respectively. During 2008, in response to the
adverse economic environment, we delayed our store expansion
program, consolidated certain back-office facilities, sold five
central Florida stores, renegotiated vendor contracts, continued
staff reductions, out-sourced certain back-office functions and
initiated targeted expense reduction programs. Managements
focus on reducing expenses and increasing operating efficiencies
is on-going and BankAtlantic anticipates further expense
reductions during 2009. Management is continuing to explore
opportunities to reduce operating expenses and increase future
operating efficiencies; however, there is no assurance that we
will be successful in these efforts.
The substantial decline in employee compensation and benefits
during the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the
same 2007 period resulted primarily from workforce reductions in
March 2007 and April
202
2008, attrition as well as declines in personnel related to the
implementation in December 2007 of reduced store lobby and call
center hours. In March 2007, BankAtlantic reduced its work force
by 225 associates, or 8%, and in April 2008 BankAtlantics
work force was further reduced by 124 associates, or 6%. As a
consequence of the work force reductions and normal attrition,
the number of full-time equivalent employees declined from 2,618
at December 31, 2006 to 1,770 at December 31, 2008, or
32%, while the store network expanded from 88 stores at
December 31, 2006 to 101 stores at December 31, 2008.
Performance bonuses during 2008 were $3.6 million lower
than in 2007 reflecting lower loan originations and deposit
growth. Share-based compensation expense was also lower for 2008
compared to 2007. The Company did not grant share based awards
during 2008 and reversed prior period share based compensation
expense as the forfeiture rate on outstanding options was
increased from 18% to 40% reflecting the significant reduction
in the workforce during 2008.
Employee compensation and benefits expenses for 2007 increased
slightly from 2006. This increase was due to the additional
employees associated with the opening of 15 stores during 2007
and the opening of 13 stores throughout 2006. These increases in
compensation expenses were partially offset by reductions of
performance bonuses in 2007 and the March 2007 workforce
reductions. Performance bonuses were $4.3 million lower
during 2007 compared to 2006, resulting in part from the
elimination of executive management cash bonuses. During the
year ended December 31, 2007, the number of full-time
equivalent BankAtlantic employees declined from 2,618 at
December 31, 2006 to 2,385 at December 31, 2007.
Occupancy and equipment expenses for 2008 declined slightly from
2007. During the year ended December 31, 2008, BankAtlantic
consolidated two call center operations into one call center in
Orlando, Florida, sold five central Florida stores to an
unrelated financial institution, terminated certain back-office
lease agreements in consolidating back-office operations and
renegotiated various vendor contracts. The above expense
reduction actions were partially offset by higher depreciation
and real estate tax expenses associated with the 2007 store
network expansion initiatives.
The significant increase in occupancy and equipment during 2007
compared to 2006 primarily resulted from the expansion of the
store network and back-office facilities to support a larger
organization. BankAtlantic entered into various operating lease
agreements relating to current and future store expansion as
well as for back-office facilities. BankAtlantic also incurred
higher operating costs for real estate taxes, guard services,
and utilities associated with the above growth and expansion
initiatives.
As a consequence of slowing new account growth and a changing
economic environment, management decided during the fourth
quarter of 2006 to reduce advertising expenses. Reflecting that
decision, advertising expenses during 2008 and 2007 were
significantly lower than 2006. The decline in advertising
expenses for 2008 compared to 2007 primarily resulted from lower
promotional costs for store grand openings and a management
decision to reduce overall marketing as part of an expense
reduction initiative. BankAtlantic opened 15 stores during 2007
and 3 during 2008.
BankAtlantic experienced an increase in check losses from 2006
to 2007. The higher check losses during 2007 were primarily
related to significant increase in the volume of checking
account overdrafts relating to the increased number of checking
accounts and the slowing economy. Stringent overdraft policies
were implemented, coupled with a decline in new account growth,
resulting in lower check losses during 2008.
The higher professional fees for 2008 compared to 2007 primarily
resulted from increased litigation costs and legal fees as well
as higher supervisory and examination fees. The litigation cost
was associated with our tax certificate activities while the
higher legal fees were mainly associated with loan foreclosure
actions and class action lawsuits. Management believes that the
current economic environment as well as the above lawsuits may
result in continued elevated legal costs in subsequent periods.
The supervisory and exam fees related to increased consulting
fees in connection with a review of our commercial loan
portfolio and regulatory compliance.
The increase in professional fees during 2007 compared to 2006
reflects higher litigation reserves and legal fees associated
with loan work-outs and pending litigation relating to
commercial residential real estate loans and the tax certificate
portfolio.
203
The decrease in supplies and postage during each of the years in
the three year period ended December 31, 2008 reflects
overall expense reduction initiatives and the conversion of
certain deposit customers to electronic bank statements.
The lower telecommunication costs for 2008 compared to 2007
primarily resulted from switching to a new vendor on more
favorable terms. The increase in telecommunication expenses for
2007 compared to 2006 was directly related to
BankAtlantics growth initiatives and store expansion.
Amortization of intangible assets consisted of the amortization
of acquired core deposit intangible assets, which are being
amortized over an estimated life of ten years.
The costs associated with debt redemptions were the result of
prepayment penalties incurred upon the prepayment of FHLB
advances in 2008 and 2006. The prepayments in 2008 were part of
an initiative to improve our net interest margin as current
short term borrowing interest rates are at historical lows. The
prepayments during 2006 were part of a market risk strategy to
reduce the effect of an asset sensitive portfolio on
BankAtlantics net interest margin by shortening the
average maturity of its outstanding interest-bearing liabilities.
The significant increase in the provision for tax certificates
losses during 2008 compared to 2007 and 2006 reflects higher
charge-offs and increases in the allowance for tax certificate
losses for certificates acquired through bulk purchases in
distressed Midwestern States. We ceased the bulk acquisition of
tax certificates and our
out-of-state
tax certificate portfolio was reduced through redemptions.
Restructuring charges, impairments and exit activities during
2008 reflect a $2.2 million severance charge in connection
with the April 2008 workforce reduction, and $5.0 million
of asset impairments and lease obligation costs associated with
managements plan to sell properties or terminate leases
associated with our decision to suspend the store expansion
initiative. Also included in restructuring charges is a
$0.3 million loss on the sale of five central Florida
stores to an unrelated financial institution.
The restructuring charges, impairments and exit activities
during 2007 reflect the March 2007 workforce reduction and
impairment and lease obligation costs associated with our
decision to suspend the store expansion initiative.
During the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
BankAtlantic recognized impairment charges on a real estate
development acquired in connection with the acquisition of a
financial institution during 2002. The development was written
down to fair value based on updated indications of value. During
2008, BankAtlantic sold all vertical construction associated
with the development and the remaining real estate inventory
consists of developed and undeveloped lots.
Impairment of real estate owned during 2008 was primarily
associated with properties acquired through tax certificate
activities in distressed areas of the country. Real estate owned
impairments during 2007 primarily resulted from a
$7.2 million write-down associated with a real estate
development acquired when BankAtlantic took possession of the
collateral securing a land acquisition and development loan
during the fourth quarter of 2006.
The Company tests goodwill for potential impairment annually or
during interim periods if impairment indicators exist. Based on
the results of its impairment evaluation, the Company recorded
an impairment charge of $48.3 million in 2008. All goodwill
in the amount of $31.0 million and $17.3 million,
respectively, relating to the Companys commercial lending
and community banking reporting units was determined to be
impaired. However, goodwill associated with the Companys
capital services, tax certificates and investment reporting
units of $13.1 million, $4.7 million and
$4.4 million, respectively, was determined to not be
impaired. The impairments in our community banking and
commercial lending business units reflect the on-going downward
trends in the financial services industry affecting the
Companys market capitalization and the credit quality of
BankAtlantics loan portfolios. BankAtlantic may recognize
additional goodwill impairment charges of up to
$22.2 million in subsequent periods if economic conditions
do not improve.
The higher other expenses during 2008 compared to 2007 primarily
resulted from a $2.3 million increase in
BankAtlantics deposit premium assessments as the credit
held by BankAtlantic against its deposit premium
204
assessments relating back to the early 1990s was exhausted
and BankAtlantic began paying the full deposit premium during
the second quarter of 2008. BankAtlantic anticipates its deposit
assessment premium to significantly increase during 2009 as the
FDIC has adopted a restoration plan that will increase the rates
banks pay for deposit insurance. BankAtlantic also incurred
$3.3 million of increased property maintenance costs
associated with real estate owned and non-performing loans.
These increases in other expenses were partially offset by lower
general operating expenses directly related to managements
expense reduction initiatives.
The higher other expenses for the year ended December 31,
2007 compared to the same 2006 period reflect higher shared
services allocations from BFC for human resources and risk
management services as well as increased insurance costs.
Provision
for Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2008 vs
|
|
|
2007 vs
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
$
|
(135,050
|
)
|
|
|
(40,818
|
)
|
|
|
49,427
|
|
|
|
(94,232
|
)
|
|
|
(90,245
|
)
|
(Provision) benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
(31,094
|
)
|
|
|
21,378
|
|
|
|
(13,105
|
)
|
|
|
(52,472
|
)
|
|
|
34,483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(166,144
|
)
|
|
|
(19,440
|
)
|
|
|
36,322
|
|
|
|
(146,704
|
)
|
|
|
(55,762
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
(23.02
|
)%
|
|
|
52.37
|
%
|
|
|
26.51
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The difference between the effective tax rate and the expected
federal income tax rate of 35% during 2008 was primarily due to
the disallowance of tax benefits associated with the current
year losses and net deferred tax assets as a result of the
establishment of a deferred tax valuation allowance. Due to
BankAtlantics recent history of losses and the significant
ongoing deterioration in economic conditions, BankAtlantic
recorded a $66.9 million deferred tax asset valuation
allowance representing the entire amount of its net deferred tax
assets as of December 31, 2008.
The difference in the effective tax rate and the expected
federal income tax rate during 2007 and 2006 was primarily due
to tax exempt income from municipal securities and benefits for
state taxes due to allocations of earnings or losses among
various state tax jurisdictions. BankAtlantics entire
portfolio of tax-exempt securities was sold during the fourth
quarter of 2007.
205
Parent
Company Results of Operations Years Ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
The following table is a condensed income statement summarizing
the Parent Companys segment results of operations (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2008 vs
|
|
|
2007 vs
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net interest income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on loans
|
|
$
|
261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and dividend income on investments
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
|
|
2,320
|
|
|
|
2,448
|
|
|
|
(1,136
|
)
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
Interest expense on Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
(21,262
|
)
|
|
|
(23,054
|
)
|
|
|
(21,933
|
)
|
|
|
1,792
|
|
|
|
(1,121
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest (expense)
|
|
|
(19,817
|
)
|
|
|
(20,734
|
)
|
|
|
(19,485
|
)
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
(1,249
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
(24,418
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,418
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest (expense) after provision
|
|
|
(44,235
|
)
|
|
|
(20,734
|
)
|
|
|
(19,485
|
)
|
|
|
(23,501
|
)
|
|
|
(1,249
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
1,281
|
|
|
|
1,634
|
|
|
|
(681
|
)
|
|
|
(353
|
)
|
Securities activities, net
|
|
|
(356
|
)
|
|
|
6,105
|
|
|
|
9,156
|
|
|
|
(6,461
|
)
|
|
|
(3,051
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
1,027
|
|
|
|
824
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
1,271
|
|
|
|
8,210
|
|
|
|
10,813
|
|
|
|
(6,939
|
)
|
|
|
(2,603
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee compensation and benefits
|
|
|
3,046
|
|
|
|
2,421
|
|
|
|
4,705
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
(2,284
|
)
|
Advertising and promotion
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
1,782
|
|
|
|
424
|
|
|
|
638
|
|
|
|
1,358
|
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
3,634
|
|
|
|
1,080
|
|
|
|
1,028
|
|
|
|
2,554
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expense
|
|
|
8,741
|
|
|
|
4,242
|
|
|
|
6,779
|
|
|
|
4,499
|
|
|
|
(2,537
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(51,705
|
)
|
|
|
(16,766
|
)
|
|
|
(15,451
|
)
|
|
|
(34,939
|
)
|
|
|
(1,315
|
)
|
(Provision) benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
(1,395
|
)
|
|
|
6,194
|
|
|
|
6,008
|
|
|
|
(7,589
|
)
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent Company loss
|
|
$
|
(53,100
|
)
|
|
|
(10,572
|
)
|
|
|
(9,443
|
)
|
|
|
(42,528
|
)
|
|
|
(1,129
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent company interest on loans during 2008 represented
interest income on a $2.3 million commercial business loan
that was returned to an accrual status as the borrowers
cash flow improved upon obtaining a tenant for the property
serving as collateral.
Interest and dividend income on investments during each of the
years in the three year period ended December 31, 2008 was
primarily interest and dividends associated with a portfolio of
debt and equity securities managed by a money manager as well as
earnings from a reverse repurchase account with BankAtlantic.
Earnings from the BankAtlantic reverse repurchase account were
$0.2 million, $0.3 million and $0.2 million
during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. The significant decline in interest and dividends
on investments during 2008 resulted from the liquidation of the
$54.2 million managed investment portfolio during the first
quarter of 2008.
Interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006 consisted primarily of debt service on the
Companys junior subordinated debentures. The decline in
interest expense during 2008 compared to 2007 resulted from
lower average interest rates in 2008 partially offset by higher
average borrowings. Average rates on junior subordinated
debentures decreased from 8.29% during the year ended
December 31, 2007 to 7.14% during the same 2008 period as a
result of lower short-term interest rates during 2008 compared
to 2007. As previously discussed, the Company elected during the
first quarter of 2009 to defer the payment of interest on all of
its junior subordinated debentures, and may continue to defer
interest payments for up to 20 consecutive quarterly periods.
During the deferral period, interest will continue to accrue on
the debentures and on the accrued interest, and the Company will
continue to recognize such deferred interest as interest expense
in its financial statements. The Companys junior
subordinated debentures average balances were
$294.2 million during 2008 compared to $277.9 million
during the same 2007 period. The increase in interest expense
during 2007 compared to 2006 primarily resulted from the
issuance of
206
$25.8 million and $5.1 million of junior subordinated
debentures in June 2007 and September 2007, respectively. The
average balance of junior subordinated debentures during the
year ended December 31, 2006 was $263.3 million.
To provide greater flexibility in holding and managing
non-performing loans and to improve BankAtlantics
financial condition, the Parent Company formed a new asset
workout subsidiary which acquired non-performing commercial and
commercial residential real estate loans from BankAtlantic for
$94.8 million in cash on March 31, 2008. BankAtlantic
transferred $101.5 million of non-performing loans to the
Parent Companys subsidiary at the loans carrying
value inclusive of $6.4 million in specific allowances for
loan losses and $0.3 million of escrow balances. The
work-out subsidiary of the Parent Company entered into a
servicing arrangement with BankAtlantic with respect to these
loans.
The composition of non-performing loans acquired from
BankAtlantic as of March 31, 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans:
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial residential real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
Builder land loans
|
|
$
|
32,039
|
|
Land acquisition and development
|
|
|
19,809
|
|
Land acquisition, development and construction
|
|
|
34,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial residential real estate
|
|
|
86,763
|
|
Commercial non-residential real estate
|
|
|
14,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accrual loans
|
|
|
101,494
|
|
Allowance for loan losses specific reserves
|
|
|
(6,440
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual loans, net
|
|
$
|
95,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The composition of the transferred non-performing loans as of
December 31, 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans:
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial residential real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
Builder land loans
|
|
$
|
22,019
|
|
Land acquisition and development
|
|
|
16,759
|
|
Land acquisition, development and construction
|
|
|
29,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial residential real estate
|
|
|
67,941
|
|
Commercial non-residential real estate
|
|
|
11,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accrual loans
|
|
|
79,327
|
|
Allowance for loan losses specific reserves
|
|
|
(11,685
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual loans, net
|
|
$
|
67,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2008,
$2.3 million of loans held by the asset work-out subsidiary
was changed to accrual status and the Company received
$1.1 million of loan repayments.
The provision for loan losses during the year ended
December 31, 2008 resulted from $19.2 million of
charge-offs on non-performing loans and an increase of specific
reserves of $5.2 million. These additional impairments were
associated with nonperforming commercial residential real estate
loans, and were due to updated loan collateral fair value
estimates reflecting the continued deterioration in the Florida
residential real
207
estate market. As previously stated, if market conditions do not
improve in the Florida real estate market, additional provisions
for loan losses and charge-offs may be required in subsequent
periods.
Income from unconsolidated subsidiaries during 2008, 2007 and
2006 represents $0.6 million, $0.7 million and
$0.6 million, respectively, of equity earnings from trusts
formed to issue trust preferred securities and $0,
$0.6 million, and $1.0 million of equity earnings in
income producing real estate joint ventures during the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The
business purpose of the joint ventures was to manage certain
rental properties with the intent to sell the properties in the
foreseeable future. The Parent Companys joint ventures
were liquidated and the Parent Company is not currently
investing in joint ventures.
During 2008, the Parent Company sold $54.2 million of
equity securities from its managed investment portfolio,
$108.4 million of Stifel common stock and warrants to
acquire 722,586 shares of Stifel common stock for a net
gain of $4.2 million. The majority of the
$181.8 million of proceeds from the sale of securities and
warrants were used to purchase $94.5 million of non-
performing loans from BankAtlantic and to contribute
$65 million of capital to BankAtlantic. The Parent Company
also recognized
other-than-temporary
impairment charges of $4.6 million associated with an
investment in a private limited partnership and an equity
investment in a private placement.
During 2007, the Parent Company sold $49.5 million of
equity securities from its managed investment portfolio for
gains of $9.1 million. The majority of the proceeds from
the sale of equity securities were used to purchase and retire
the Companys Class A common stock. The Parent Company
recognized $0.3 million of unrealized gains from market
appreciation of Stifel warrants and recorded an
other-than-temporary
impairment of $3.3 million associated with an investment in
a private limited partnership.
Securities activities gains during the year ended
December 31, 2006 primarily represent gains from managed
funds. During 2006, the Parent Company sold $69.1 million
of equity securities from its portfolio for gains of
$9.2 million. The majority of the proceeds from the sale of
equity securities were reinvested in equity securities. A
portion of these proceeds was also used to fund interest expense
on junior subordinated debentures.
Other income during the year ended December 31, 2008 and
2007 represents fees charged to BankAtlantic for executive
management services. These fees are eliminated in the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
The Companys compensation expense during the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 represents salaries and
bonuses for executive officers of the Company as well as
recruitment expenses. The lower compensation expense during 2007
compared to 2006 and 2008 primarily reflects the elimination of
performance bonuses during 2007. Compensation expense during
2008 also included a $0.6 million reduction in share-based
compensation as the forfeiture rate was increased from 18% to
40% to reflect updated historical forfeiture experience.
Additional compensation expense during 2006 included payroll
taxes associated with the exercise of stock options. Share-based
compensation expense was $1.2 million for each of the years
in the two year period ended December 31, 2007 and
$0.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2008.
Advertising costs during each of the years in the three year
period ended December 31, 2008 represents investor
relations expenditures and the cost of shareholder
correspondence and the annual meetings.
During 2008 the Parent Company incurred higher professional fees
associated with a securities
class-action
lawsuit filed against the Company and the formal investigation
into the
class-action
lawsuit matter by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Also
included in professional fees during 2008 were legal costs
incurred associated with servicing the non-performing loans held
in a work-out subsidiary of the Parent Company. Professional
fees during 2006 and 2007 were primarily legal costs for general
corporate matters.
The increase in other expenses during the year ended
December 31, 2008 compared to the same periods during 2007
and 2006 reflect $2.5 million for property maintenance
costs for non-performing loans in the process of foreclosure.
The Parent Company also incurred $0.2 million of loan
servicing fees from BankAtlantic related to the loans held by
the asset workout subsidiary. Also included in other expenses
for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 were
fees paid to BFC for investor relations, risk management and
executive management personnel services provided to the Company
by BFC.
208
The Parent Company recognized a provision for income taxes of
$1.4 million in 2008 and an income tax benefit of
$6.2 million and $6.0 million in 2007 and 2006,
respectively. These amounts represent effective tax rates of
2.65%, 36.94% and 38.88% for 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The change in the Companys effective tax rate in 2008 from
2007 and 2006 was primarily due to the disallowance of tax
benefits associated with the Parent Companys current year
loss as a result of a deferred tax valuation allowance
established during 2008. The Companys 2005 and 2007
Federal income tax returns are currently under examination by
the Internal Revenue Service.
BankAtlantic
Bancorp, Inc. Consolidated Financial Condition
As of
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
The Company reduced its total assets with a view to improving
its regulatory capital ratios. Total assets were decreased by
selling securities available for sale, significantly reducing
loan purchases and originations as well as substantially
reducing the acquisition of tax certificates. The proceeds from
payments on earning assets and securities sales were used to pay
down borrowings.
Total assets at June 30, 2009 were $5.3 billion
compared to $5.8 billion at December 31, 2008. The
changes in components of total assets from December 31,
2008 to June 30, 2009 are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents primarily reflecting
$107.3 million of higher cash balances at the Federal
Reserve Bank associated with daily cash management activities;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in securities available for sale reflecting the sale of
$190.6 million of mortgage-backed securities as well as
repayments associated with higher residential mortgage
refinancings in response to low historical residential mortgage
interest rates during the period;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in tax certificate balances primarily due to
redemptions and decreased tax certificate acquisitions compared
to prior periods;
|
|
|
|
Decline in FHLB stock related to lower FHLB advance borrowings;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Higher residential loans held for sale primarily resulting from
increased originations associated with residential mortgage
refinancings;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in loan receivable balances associated with repayments
of residential loans in the normal course of business combined
with a significant decline in loan purchases and originations;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in accrued interest receivable primarily resulting from
lower loan balances and a significant decline in interest rates;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in real estate owned associated with commercial real
estate and residential loan foreclosures; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in goodwill associated with the impairment of
$9.1 million of goodwill.
|
The Companys total liabilities at June 30, 2009 were
$5.1 billion compared to $5.6 billion at
December 31, 2008. The changes in components of total
liabilities from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009
are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
Increased interest bearing deposit account balances associated
with sales efforts and promotions of higher-yielding
interest-bearing checking accounts partially offset by lower
time deposits;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Higher non-interest-bearing deposit balances primarily due to
increased customer balances in checking accounts;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lower FHLB advances and short term borrowings due to repayments
using proceeds from the sales of securities, loan repayments and
increases in deposit account balances; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in junior subordinated debentures due to interest
deferrals.
|
209
As of
December 31, 2008 and 2007
Total assets at December 31, 2008 were $5.8 billion
compared to $6.4 billion at December 31, 2007. The
changes in components of total assets from December 31,
2007 to December 31, 2008 are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
Higher cash and due from depository institution balances
resulting from additional cash at automated teller machines and
cash on hand;
|
|
|
|
Increase in federal funds sold and short term investments
associated with daily treasury management;
|
|
|
|
Decrease in securities available for sale and financial
instruments reflecting the sale of Stifel common stock, the sale
of Stifel warrants, the liquidation of managed fund equity
investments held by the Parent Company and principal repayments
on agency securities;
|
|
|
|
Decrease in investment securities at cost primarily resulting
from the sale of Stifel common stock and certain private equity
securities;
|
|
|
|
Increase in tax certificate balances primarily due to higher
Florida tax certificate acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
Decline in FHLB stock related to lower FHLB advance borrowings;
|
|
|
|
Decrease in loan receivable balances associated with a
$43.2 million increase in the allowance for loan losses as
well as lower residential loan balances partially offset by
higher small business, commercial business and home equity loan
balances;
|
|
|
|
Lower real estate held for development and sale balances
associated with impairments and the sale of inventory of homes
at a real estate development;
|
|
|
|
Decrease in office properties and equipment primarily due to the
sale of five central Florida stores to an unrelated financial
institution as well as the disposal of properties in connection
with the on-going consolidation of back-office facilities;
|
|
|
|
Decrease in deferred tax asset, net due to the establishment of
a deferred tax asset valuation allowance;
|
|
|
|
Decrease in goodwill associated with the recognition of a
$48.3 million goodwill impairment; and
|
|
|
|
Decline in other assets reflecting the receipt of income tax
refunds associated with the carry-back of taxable losses for the
year ended December 31, 2007.
|
The Companys total liabilities at December 31, 2008
were $5.6 billion compared to $5.9 billion at
December 31, 2007. The changes in components of total
liabilities from December 31, 2007 to December 31,
2008 are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
Lower non-interest-bearing deposit balances primarily reflecting
the migration of non-interest bearing deposits to
interest-bearing NOW accounts as BankAtlantic promoted higher
interest rate NOW accounts during 2008 in response to greater
competition;
|
|
|
|
Decline in insured savings and money market accounts primarily
reflecting deposit outflows resulting from interest rate
reductions on high yield account products as high rates from
prior period promotions were discontinued;
|
|
|
|
Increase in certificate accounts reflecting higher brokered
deposit balances as well as a higher interest rate certificate
account promotion during 2008;
|
|
|
|
Lower FHLB advance borrowings due to a decline in total assets
and the availability of alternative funding sources at lower
interest rates;
|
|
|
|
Higher short-term borrowings associated with funds obtained from
the Treasury at lower interest rates than alternate funding
sources; and
|
|
|
|
Decrease in other liabilities primarily resulting from a decline
in accrued interest payable on borrowings associated with
significantly lower interest rates at period end.
|
210
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
BankAtlantic
Bancorp, Inc.
The Companys principal source of liquidity is its cash,
investments and funds obtained from its wholly-owned work-out
subsidiary. The Company also may obtain funds through dividends
from its other subsidiaries, issuance of equity and debt
securities, and liquidation of its investments, although no
dividends from BankAtlantic are anticipated or contemplated in
the foreseeable future. The Company may use its funds to
contribute capital to its subsidiaries, pay debt service and
shareholder dividends, repay borrowings, invest in equity
securities and other investments, and fund operations, including
funding servicing costs and real estate owned operating expenses
of its wholly-owned work-out subsidiary. The Companys
estimated annual interest expense associated with its junior
subordinated debentures is approximately $14.0 million. In
order to preserve liquidity in the current difficult economic
environment, the Company elected in February 2009 to defer
interest payments on all of its outstanding junior subordinated
debentures and to cease paying dividends on its common stock.
The terms of the junior subordinated debentures and the trust
documents allow the Company to defer payments of interest for up
to 20 consecutive quarterly periods without default or penalty.
During the deferral period, the respective trusts will likewise
suspend the declaration and payment of dividends on the trust
preferred securities. The deferral election began as of March
2009 and regularly scheduled quarterly interest payments
aggregating $7.2 million that would otherwise have been
paid during the six months ended June 30, 2009 were
deferred. The Company has the ability under the junior
subordinated debentures to continue to defer interest payments
through ongoing, appropriate notices to each of the trustees,
and will make a decision each quarter as to whether to continue
the deferral of interest. During the deferral period, interest
will continue to accrue on the junior subordinated debentures at
the stated coupon rate, including on the deferred interest, and
the Company will continue to record the interest expense
associated with the junior subordinated debentures. During the
deferral period, the Company may not, among other things and
with limited exceptions, pay cash dividends on or repurchase its
common stock nor make any payment on outstanding debt
obligations that rank equally with or junior to the junior
subordinated debentures. The Company may end the deferral by
paying all accrued and unpaid interest. The Company anticipates
that it will continue to defer interest on its junior
subordinated debentures and will not pay dividends on its common
stock for the foreseeable future.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company
received $15.0 million of dividends from BankAtlantic. The
Company does not anticipate receiving dividends from
BankAtlantic during the year ending December 31, 2009 until
economic conditions and the performance of BankAtlantics
assets improve. The ability of BankAtlantic to pay dividends or
make other distributions to the Company is subject to
regulations and prior approval of the Office of Thrift
Supervision (OTS) approval. The OTS would not
approve any distribution that would cause BankAtlantic to fail
to meet its capital requirements or if the OTS believes that a
capital distribution by BankAtlantic constitutes an unsafe or
unsound action or practice, and there is no assurance that the
OTS would approve future applications for capital distributions
from BankAtlantic.
The Companys anticipated liquidity focus during the latter
half of 2009 is on providing capital to BankAtlantic, if needed,
managing the cash requirements of its asset work-out subsidiary,
and funding its operating expenses. The Company is required to
provide BankAtlantic with managerial assistance and capital as
the OTS may determine necessary under applicable regulations and
supervisory standards. During the six months ended June 30,
2009, the Company contributed $30.0 million of capital to
BankAtlantic.
On August 10, 2009, the Company announced that it intends
to pursue a rights offering for up to $100 million of its
Class A Common Stock. A record date of August 24, 2009 has
been set for the proposed rights offering. Upon commencement of
the proposed rights offering, BankAtlantic Bancorp will
distribute non-transferable subscription rights to purchase
shares of its Class A Common Stock to each holder of its
Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock as of
the close of business on the record date. The amount of
subscription rights to be distributed in the rights offering
will be determined based on the total number of all outstanding
shares of BankAtlantic Bancorps Common Stock on the record
date. The subscription price, which is anticipated to be at a
discount to the market price, will be determined on a date
closer to the record date. BankAtlantic Bancorp previously filed
a shelf registration statement including a
211
prospectus with the SEC dated April 25, 2008, which was
declared effective by the SEC on July 8, 2008. This shelf
registration statement will be used in connection with the
proposed rights offering. The rights offering will be made only
by means of a prospectus supplement to be distributed to record
date shareholders as soon as possible after the record date.
In addition to the announced rights offering, the Company may
also consider pursuing the issuance of additional securities,
which could include Class A common stock, debt, preferred
stock, warrants or any combination thereof. Any such financing
could be obtained through public or private offerings, in
privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Additionally, we
could pursue these financings at the Parent Company level or
directly at BankAtlantic or both. The announced rights offering
and any other financing involving the issuance of our
Class A common stock or securities convertible or
exercisable for our Class A common stock could be highly
dilutive for our existing shareholders. There is no assurance
that any such financing will be available to us on favorable
terms or at all.
The sale of Ryan Beck to Stifel closed on February 28,
2007, and the sales agreement provided for contingent earn-out
payments, payable in cash or shares of Stifel common stock, at
Stifels election, based on certain Ryan Beck revenues
during the two-year period immediately following the closing,
which ended on February 28, 2009. The Company received
$8.6 million in earn-out payments paid in
250,233 shares of Stifel common stock in March 2009. The
Stifel stock was sold for net proceeds of $8.7 million.
Pursuant to the terms of the Ryan Beck merger, the Company
agreed to indemnify Stifel against certain losses arising out of
activities of Ryan Beck prior to its sale. Stifel indicated that
it believes it is entitled to indemnification payments under the
agreement. Based on information provided by Stifel to date,
management does not believe that it is obligated to indemnify
Stifel under the terms of the merger agreement.
The Company had the following cash and investments as of
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 that it believes
provide a source for potential liquidity based on values at
those dates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Appreciation
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
16,122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,122
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
Private investment securities
|
|
|
2,036
|
|
|
|
979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
18,377
|
|
|
|
979
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
19,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Appreciation
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
37,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,116
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
1,597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,597
|
|
Private investment securities
|
|
|
2,036
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
40,749
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The non-performing loans transferred to the wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company may also provide a potential source of
liquidity through workouts, repayments of the loans or sales of
interests in the subsidiary. The balance of these loans at
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was
$67.9 million and $81.6 million, respectively. During
the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Parent Company
received net cash flows of $5.0 million from its work-out
subsidiary.
212
BankAtlantic
BankAtlantics liquidity will depend on its ability to
generate sufficient cash to support loan demand, to meet deposit
withdrawals, and to pay operating expenses. BankAtlantics
securities portfolio provides an internal source of liquidity
through its short-term investments as well as scheduled
maturities and interest payments. Loan repayments and loan sales
also provide an internal source of liquidity.
BankAtlantics liquidity is also dependent, in part, on its
ability to maintain or increase deposit levels and availability
under lines of credit, Treasury and Federal Reserve programs.
Additionally, interest rate changes, additional collateral
requirements, disruptions in the capital markets or
deterioration in BankAtlantics financial condition may
make borrowings unavailable or make terms of the borrowings and
deposits less favorable. As a result, there is a risk that our
cost of funds will increase or that the availability of funding
sources may decrease.
BankAtlantics primary sources of funds are deposits;
principal repayments of loans, tax certificates and securities
available for sale; proceeds from the sale of loans and
securities available for sale; proceeds from securities sold
under agreements to repurchase; advances from FHLB; Treasury and
Federal Reserve lending programs; interest payments on loans and
securities; capital contributions from the Parent Company; and
other funds generated by operations. These funds are primarily
utilized to fund loan disbursements and purchases, deposit
outflows, repayments of securities sold under agreements to
repurchase, repayments of advances from FHLB and other
borrowings, purchases of tax certificates and securities
available for sale, acquisitions of properties and equipment,
and operating expenses.
In October 2008, the FDIC announced a Liquidity Guarantee
Program. Under this program, certain newly issued senior
unsecured debt issued on or before October 31, 2009, would
be fully protected in the event the issuing institution
subsequently fails, or its holding company files for bankruptcy.
This includes promissory notes, commercial paper, inter-bank
funding, and any unsecured portion of secured debt. Coverage
would be limited to the period ending December 31, 2012,
even if the maturity exceeds that date. Subject to FDIC
approval, the program could provide BankAtlantic with additional
liquidity as certain new borrowings may be guaranteed by the
FDIC. The FDIC also announced that any participating depository
institution will be able to provide full deposit insurance
coverage for non-interest bearing deposit transaction accounts
and interest bearing accounts with rates at or below fifty basis
points, regardless of dollar amount. This new, temporary
guarantee will expire at the end of 2009. BankAtlantic
opted-in to the additional coverage on qualifying
borrowings and non-interest bearing deposits. As a result,
BankAtlantic will be assessed a 75-basis point fee on new
covered borrowings, and was assessed a 10-basis point surcharge
for non-interest bearing deposit transaction account balances
exceeding the previously insured amount.
In October 2008, the FDIC adopted a restoration plan that
increased the rates depository institutions pay for deposit
insurance. Under the restoration plan, the assessment rate
schedule was raised by 7 basis points for all depository
institutions beginning on January 1, 2009 and the
assessment rates were raised again on April 1, 2009 based
on the risk rating of each financial institution. Additionally,
the FDIC announced a 5 basis point special assessment as of
June 30, 2009 payable in September 2009. As a consequence,
BankAtlantics FDIC insurance premium including the special
assessment increased from $1.0 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 to $6.4 million during the same
2009 period.
The FHLB has granted BankAtlantic a line of credit capped at 40%
of assets subject to available collateral, with a maximum term
of ten years. BankAtlantic had utilized its FHLB line of credit
to borrow $597.0 million and to obtain a $293 million
letter of credit securing deposits as of June 30, 2009. The
line of credit is secured by a blanket lien on
BankAtlantics residential mortgage loans and certain
commercial real estate and consumer home equity loans.
BankAtlantics unused available borrowings under this line
of credit were approximately $247 million at June 30,
2009. An additional source of liquidity for BankAtlantic is its
securities portfolio. As of June 30, 2009, BankAtlantic had
$246 million of unpledged securities that could be sold or
pledged for additional borrowings with the FHLB, the Federal
Reserve or other financial institutions. BankAtlantic is a
participating institution in the Federal Reserve Treasury
Investment Program for up to $9.2 million in fundings and
at June 30, 2009, BankAtlantic had $5.6 million of
short-term borrowings outstanding under this program.
BankAtlantic is also eligible to participate in the Federal
Reserves discount window program. The amount that can be
borrowed under this program is dependent on available
collateral,
213
and BankAtlantic had unused available borrowings of
approximately $119 million as of June 30, 2009, with
no amounts outstanding under this program at June 30, 2009.
The above lines of credit are subject to periodic review and may
be reduced or terminated at any time by the issuer institution.
If the current economic trends continue to adversely affect our
performance, the above borrowings may be limited, additional
collateral may be required or these borrowings may not be
available to us, and BankAtlantics liquidity could be
materially adversely affected.
BankAtlantic also has various relationships to acquire brokered
deposits, and to execute repurchase agreements, which may be
utilized as an alternative source of liquidity, if needed.
BankAtlantic does not anticipate its brokered deposit balances
to significantly increase in the foreseeable future. At
June 30, 2009, BankAtlantic had $223.4 million and
$25.8 million of brokered deposits and securities sold
under agreements to repurchase outstanding, representing 4.3%
and 0.5% of total assets, respectively. At December 31,
2008, BankAtlantic had $239.9 million and
$46.1 million of brokered deposits and securities sold
under agreements to repurchase outstanding. Additional
repurchase agreement borrowings are subject to available
collateral. Additionally, BankAtlantic had total cash on hand or
with other financial institutions of $213.0 million as of
June 30, 2009. BankAtlantic had federal funds sold of
$20.8 million and total cash on hand or with other
financial institutions of $127.7 million as of
December 31, 2008.
BankAtlantics liquidity may be affected by unforeseen
demands on cash. Our objective in managing liquidity is to
maintain sufficient resources of available liquid assets to
address our funding needs. Multiple market disruptions have made
it more difficult for financial institutions to borrow money. We
cannot predict with any degree of certainty how long these
market conditions may continue, nor can we anticipate the degree
that such market conditions may impact our operations.
Deterioration in the performance of other financial institutions
may adversely impact the ability of all financial institutions
to access liquidity. There is no assurance that further
deterioration in the financial markets will not result in
additional market-wide liquidity problems, and affect our
liquidity position. In order to improve its liquidity position,
BankAtlantic reduced its borrowings by $634.1 million as of
June 30, 2009 compared to December 31, 2008, by
increasing its total deposits and utilizing the proceeds from
the sale of securities available for sale and repayments of
earning assets to pay down borrowings. Additionally,
BankAtlantic anticipates continued reductions in assets and
borrowings in the foreseeable future.
BankAtlantics commitments to originate and purchase loans
at June 30, 2009 were $88.5 million and $0,
respectively, compared to $84.4 million and
$6.6 million, respectively, at June 30, 2008. At
June 30, 2009, total loan commitments represented
approximately 2.20% of net loans receivable.
BankAtlantics commitments to originate and purchase loans
at December 31, 2008 were $38.4 million and $3.0,
respectively, compared to $176.9 million and
$61.1 million, respectively, at December 31, 2007. At
December 31, 2008, total loan commitments represented
approximately 0.90% of net loans receivable.
At June 30, 2009, BankAtlantic had investments and
mortgage-backed securities of approximately $33.1 million
pledged against securities sold under agreements to repurchase,
$6.0 million pledged against public deposits and
$8.9 million pledged against treasury tax and loan accounts.
At December 31, 2008, BankAtlantic had mortgage-backed
securities of approximately $47.9 million pledged to secure
securities sold under agreements to repurchase,
$109.3 million pledged to secure public deposits,
$225.4 million pledged to secure term auction facilities
and $51.4 million pledged to secure treasury tax and loan
accounts.
214
A significant source of our liquidity is repayments and
maturities of loans and securities. The table below presents the
contractual principal repayments and maturity dates of our loan
portfolio and securities available for sale at December 31,
2008. The total amount of principal repayments on loans and
securities contractually due after December 31, 2009 was
$4.2 billion, of which $1.8 billion have fixed
interest rates and $2.4 billion have floating or adjustable
interest rates. Actual principal repayments may differ from
information shown below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
For the Period Ending December 31,(1)
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010-2011
|
|
|
2012-2016
|
|
|
2017-2021
|
|
|
2022-2026
|
|
|
>2027
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
1,449,620
|
|
|
|
665,220
|
|
|
|
309,179
|
|
|
|
316,651
|
|
|
|
94,982
|
|
|
|
60,879
|
|
|
|
2,709
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
|
1,933,077
|
|
|
|
40,286
|
|
|
|
5,861
|
|
|
|
30,506
|
|
|
|
265,104
|
|
|
|
81,892
|
|
|
|
1,509,428
|
|
Consumer and home equity
|
|
|
745,086
|
|
|
|
1,384
|
|
|
|
5,861
|
|
|
|
297,845
|
|
|
|
370,009
|
|
|
|
69,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business
|
|
|
251,248
|
|
|
|
120,903
|
|
|
|
43,983
|
|
|
|
81,387
|
|
|
|
4,428
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
4,379,031
|
|
|
|
827,793
|
|
|
|
364,884
|
|
|
|
726,389
|
|
|
|
734,523
|
|
|
|
213,305
|
|
|
|
1,512,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available for sale(1)
|
|
$
|
699,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
|
36,850
|
|
|
|
128,162
|
|
|
|
533,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Does not include $2.4 million of equity securities. |
Loan maturities and sensitivity of loans to changes in interest
rates for commercial business and real estate construction loans
at December 31, 2008 were (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
One year or less
|
|
$
|
215,440
|
|
|
|
291,441
|
|
|
|
506,881
|
|
Over one year, but less than five years
|
|
|
31,909
|
|
|
|
9,084
|
|
|
|
40,993
|
|
Over five years
|
|
|
3,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
251,248
|
|
|
|
300,525
|
|
|
|
551,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due After One Year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-determined interest rate
|
|
$
|
35,808
|
|
|
|
9,084
|
|
|
|
44,892
|
|
Floating or adjustable interest rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
35,808
|
|
|
|
9,084
|
|
|
|
44,892
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantics geographic loan concentration based on
outstanding loan balances at December 31, 2008 was:
|
|
|
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
Eastern U.S.A.
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
Western U.S.A.
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
Central U.S.A.
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
The loan concentration for BankAtlantics originated loans
is primarily in Florida. The concentration in locations other
than Florida primarily relates to purchased wholesale
residential real estate loans.
As of December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2009,
BankAtlantics capital was in excess of all regulatory
well capitalized levels. However, the OTS, at its
discretion, can at any time require an institution to maintain
capital amounts and ratios above the established well
capitalized requirements based on its view of the risk
profile of the specific institution. If higher capital
requirements are imposed, BankAtlantic could be required to
raise additional capital. There is no assurance that additional
capital will not be necessary, or that the Company or
BankAtlantic would be successful in raising additional capital
in subsequent periods. The
215
Companys inability to raise capital or be deemed
well capitalized could have a material adverse
impact on the Companys financial condition and results.
BankAtlantic works closely with its regulators during the course
of its exams and on an ongoing basis. Communications with our
regulators include, from time to time, providing information on
an ad-hoc, one-time or regular basis related to areas of
regulatory oversight and bank operations. As part of such
communications, BankAtlantic has provided to its regulators
forecasts, strategic business plans and other information
relating to anticipated asset balances, asset quality, capital
levels, expenses, anticipated earnings, levels of brokered
deposits and liquidity, and has indicated that BankAtlantic has
no plans to pay dividends to its parent. The information which
BankAtlantic provides to its regulators is based on estimates
and assumptions made by management at the time provided which
are inherently uncertain.
At the indicated dates, BankAtlantics capital amounts and
ratios were (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adequately
|
|
Well
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
Capitalized
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Ratio
|
|
At June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital
|
|
$
|
429,333
|
|
|
|
11.81
|
%
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital
|
|
|
360,943
|
|
|
|
9.93
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
Tangible capital
|
|
|
360,943
|
|
|
|
7.01
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
Core capital
|
|
|
360,943
|
|
|
|
7.01
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
At December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital
|
|
$
|
456,776
|
|
|
|
11.63
|
%
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital
|
|
|
385,006
|
|
|
|
9.85
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
Tangible capital
|
|
|
385,006
|
|
|
|
6.94
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
Core capital
|
|
|
385,006
|
|
|
|
6.94
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
At December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital
|
|
$
|
495,668
|
|
|
|
11.63
|
%
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital
|
|
|
420,063
|
|
|
|
9.85
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
Tangible capital
|
|
|
420,063
|
|
|
|
6.94
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
Core capital
|
|
|
420,063
|
|
|
|
6.94
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
Savings institutions are also subject to the provisions of the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991
(FDICIA). Regulations implementing the prompt
corrective action provisions of FDICIA define specific capital
categories based on FDICIAs defined capital ratios, as
discussed more fully in the Information About BFC
section under Regulation of Federal Savings Banks.
Consolidated
Cash Flows Years Ended December 31, 2008, 2007
and 2006
A summary of our consolidated cash flows follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
75,447
|
|
|
|
40,928
|
|
|
|
3,359
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
281,186
|
|
|
|
(22,066
|
)
|
|
|
(205,891
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(322,250
|
)
|
|
|
(30,183
|
)
|
|
|
174,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
34,383
|
|
|
|
(11,321
|
)
|
|
|
(28,072
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in cash flows from operating activities during 2008
compared to 2007 was primarily due to a reduction in
non-interest expenses. The Company experienced a decline in
employee compensation
216
associated with its restructuring plan that included reduced
store hours and the consolidation of back-office facilities. The
Company also reduced its advertising and promotion expense by
18% during 2008 compared to 2007. The increase in cash flows
from operating activities during 2007 compared to 2006 primarily
resulted from a substantial increase in non-interest income from
service charges on deposits as well as a significant reduction
in advertising and promotion expenses. During 2007, service
charge fees increased primarily due to new deposit accounts.
The increase in cash flows from investing activities during 2008
compared to 2007 primarily resulted from a decline in interest
earning assets as loan and securities repayments exceeded loan
originations and securities purchased. The Company reduced its
total assets during 2008 in order to improve its regulatory
capital levels in response to the difficult economic
environment. The increase in cash flows from investing
activities during 2007 compared to 2006 was primarily due to a
decline in net loan originations and decreased purchases of
property and equipment.
The decrease in cash flows from financing activities during 2008
compared to 2007 resulted from the prepayments of FHLB advances.
The prepayments were accompanied by a decline in interest
earning assets. The decrease in cash flows from financing
activities during 2007 compared to 2006 primarily resulted from
net repayments of FHLB advances as well as the purchase and
retirement of the Companys Class A Common Stock.
Contractual
Obligations and Off Balance Sheet Arrangements As of
June 30, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
1-3 years
|
|
|
4-5 years
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
$
|
1,230,829
|
|
|
|
1,160,960
|
|
|
|
56,398
|
|
|
|
13,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
324,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
7,939
|
|
|
|
294,195
|
|
Advances from FHLB(1)
|
|
|
597,020
|
|
|
|
505,020
|
|
|
|
92,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations held for sublease
|
|
|
30,203
|
|
|
|
1,282
|
|
|
|
3,616
|
|
|
|
2,421
|
|
|
|
22,884
|
|
Operating lease obligations held for use
|
|
|
72,582
|
|
|
|
7,686
|
|
|
|
17,872
|
|
|
|
7,790
|
|
|
|
39,234
|
|
Pension obligation
|
|
|
17,340
|
|
|
|
1,269
|
|
|
|
2,995
|
|
|
|
3,229
|
|
|
|
9,847
|
|
Other obligations
|
|
|
12,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,800
|
|
|
|
6,400
|
|
|
|
1,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations
|
|
$
|
2,284,908
|
|
|
|
1,676,217
|
|
|
|
199,681
|
|
|
|
41,250
|
|
|
|
367,760
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Payments due by period are based on contractual maturities |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
The above table excludes interest payments on interest bearing
liabilities |
Off
Balance Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations and Loan
Commitments As of December 31, 2008
The table below summarizes the Companys loan commitments
at December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Commitment Expiration per Period
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5
|
|
Commercial Commitments
|
|
Committed
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
4-5 Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Lines of credit
|
|
$
|
501,431
|
|
|
|
70,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
430,789
|
|
Standby letters of credit
|
|
|
20,558
|
|
|
|
20,558
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other commercial commitments
|
|
|
41,368
|
|
|
|
41,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial commitments
|
|
$
|
563,357
|
|
|
|
132,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
430,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lines of credit are primarily revolving lines to home equity and
business loan customers. The business loans usually expire in
less than one year and the home equity lines generally expire in
15 years.
217
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by
BankAtlantic to guarantee the performance of a customer to a
third party. BankAtlantic standby letters of credit are
generally issued to customers in the construction industry
guaranteeing project performance. These types of standby letters
of credit had a maximum exposure of $14.1 million at
December 31, 2008. BankAtlantic also issues standby letters
of credit to commercial lending customers guaranteeing the
payment of goods and services. These types of standby letters of
credit had a maximum exposure of $6.4 million at
December 31, 2008. Those guarantees are primarily issued to
support public and private borrowing arrangements and have
maturities of one year or less. The credit risk involved in
issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that
involved in extending loans to customers. BankAtlantic may hold
certificates of deposit and residential and commercial real
estate liens as collateral for such commitments, similar to
other types of borrowings.
Other commercial commitments are agreements to lend funds to a
customer as long as there is no violation of any condition
established in the commitment. Commitments generally have fixed
expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require
payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to
expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do
not necessarily represent future cash requirements. BankAtlantic
evaluates each customers creditworthiness on a
case-by-case
basis. The amount of collateral required by BankAtlantic in
connection with an extension of credit is based on
managements credit evaluation of the counter-party.
At December 31, 2008, the Company did not have off balance
sheet arrangements that would have a material effect on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
The table below summarizes the Companys contractual
obligations at December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
4-5 Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
$
|
1,338,176
|
|
|
|
1,229,144
|
|
|
|
65,640
|
|
|
|
43,377
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
317,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
864
|
|
|
|
294,195
|
|
Advances from FHLB(1)
|
|
|
967,028
|
|
|
|
565,000
|
|
|
|
402,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations held for sublease
|
|
|
30,729
|
|
|
|
1,241
|
|
|
|
3,657
|
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
23,428
|
|
Operating lease obligations held for use
|
|
|
74,369
|
|
|
|
7,983
|
|
|
|
11,635
|
|
|
|
9,562
|
|
|
|
45,189
|
|
Pension obligation
|
|
|
17,340
|
|
|
|
1,269
|
|
|
|
2,995
|
|
|
|
3,229
|
|
|
|
9,847
|
|
Other obligations
|
|
|
20,056
|
|
|
|
2,956
|
|
|
|
5,900
|
|
|
|
6,400
|
|
|
|
4,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations
|
|
$
|
2,764,757
|
|
|
|
1,807,593
|
|
|
|
513,855
|
|
|
|
65,835
|
|
|
|
377,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Payments due by period are based on contractual maturities |
|
(2) |
|
The above table excludes interest payments on interest bearing
liabilities |
Long-term debt primarily consists of the junior subordinated
debentures issued by the Company as well as BankAtlantics
subordinated debentures and mortgage backed bonds.
Operating lease obligations held for sublease represent minimum
future lease payments on executed leases that the Company
intends to sublease or terminate. These lease agreements were
primarily initiated in connection with BankAtlantics store
expansion program.
Operating lease obligations held for use represent minimum
future lease payments in which the Company is the lessee for
real estate and equipment leases.
The pension obligation represents the accumulated benefit
obligation of the Companys defined benefit plan at
December 31, 2008. The payments represent the estimated
benefit payments through 2018, the majority of which will be
funded through plan assets. The table does not include estimated
benefit payments after 2018. The actuarial present value of the
projected accumulated benefit obligation was $31.2 million
at December 31, 2008. The plan was underfunded by
$13.2 million as of December 31, 2008. The Company is
required to fund plan deficits over a seven year period which
would include a contribution of $1.6 million to
218
the pension plan for the year ended December 31, 2009. The
Companys future cash contribution may increase or decrease
depending on the performance of the plan assets and the increase
or decrease of the projected benefit obligation in subsequent
periods.
Other obligations are primarily legally binding agreements with
vendors for advertising, marketing and sponsorship services.
Pursuant to the agreement for the sale of Ryan Beck to Stifel,
the Company agreed to indemnify Stifel and its affiliates
against third party claims attributable to the conduct or
activities of Ryan Beck prior to the merger. This
indemnification is subject to specified thresholds and time
periods and to a cap of $20 million. The Company also
agreed to indemnify Stifel against federal tax liabilities and
claims relating to the ownership interests in Ryan Beck.
BankAtlantic has terminated various operating leases originally
executed for store expansion or back-office facilities. In
certain lease terminations the landlord consents to the
assignment of the lease to a third party; however, BankAtlantic
remains secondarily liable for the lease obligation. As of
December 31, 2008 BankAtlantic was secondarily liable for
$11.9 million of lease payments. BankAtlantic uses the same
credit policies in assigning these leases to third parties as it
does in originating loans.
During the fourth quarter of 2006, BankAtlantic initiated an
investment strategy including the purchase of agency securities
with a call option written on the purchased agency securities.
When utilizing this strategy, BankAtlantic is subject to the
off-balance sheet risk of foregoing the appreciation on the
agency securities in exchange for the option premium and the
potential of owning
out-of-the-money
agency securities if interest rates rise. No call option
contracts were outstanding as of December 31, 2008.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Management views critical accounting policies as accounting
policies that are important to the understanding of our
financial statements and also involve estimates and judgments
about inherently uncertain matters. In preparing the financial
statements, management is required to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
as of the date of the consolidated statements of financial
condition and assumptions that affect the recognition of income
and expenses on the consolidated statements of operations for
the periods presented. Actual results could differ significantly
from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly
susceptible to significant change in subsequent periods relate
to the determination of the allowance for loan losses,
evaluation of goodwill and other intangible assets for
impairment, the valuation of securities as well as the
determination of
other-than-temporary
declines in value, the valuation of real estate acquired in
connection with foreclosure or in satisfaction of loans, the
amount of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance, accounting
for uncertain tax positions, accounting for contingencies, and
assumptions used in the valuation of stock based compensation.
The four accounting policies that we have identified as critical
accounting policies are: (i) allowance for loan losses;
(ii) valuation of securities as well as the determination
of
other-than-temporary
declines in value; (iii) impairment of goodwill and other
long-lived assets; and (iv) the accounting for deferred tax
asset valuation allowance. We have discussed the critical
accounting estimates outlined below with our audit committee of
our board of directors, and the audit committee has reviewed our
disclosure. See note 1 to the notes to our consolidated
financial statements for a detailed discussion of our
significant accounting policies.
Allowance
for loan losses
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at an amount that we
believe to be adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in our
loan portfolio. We have developed policies and procedures for
evaluating our allowance for loan losses which consider all
information available to us. However, we must rely on estimates
and judgments regarding issues where the outcome is unknown. As
a consequence, if circumstances differ from our estimates and
judgments the allowance for loan losses may decrease or increase
significantly.
219
The calculation of our allowance for loan losses consists of two
components. The first component requires us to identify impaired
loans based on management classification and, if necessary,
assign a valuation allowance to the impaired loans. Valuation
allowances are established using management estimates of the
fair value of collateral or based on valuation models that
present value estimated expected future cash flows discounted at
the loans effective interest rate. These valuations are based on
available information and require estimates and subjective
judgments about fair values of the collateral or expected future
cash flows. Most of our loans do not have an observable market
price and an estimate of the collection of contractual cash
flows is based on the judgment of management. It is likely that
we would obtain materially different results if different
assumptions or conditions were to prevail. As a consequence of
the estimates and assumptions required to calculate the first
component of our allowance for loan losses, a change in these
highly uncertain estimates could have a materially favorable or
unfavorable impact on our financial condition and results of
operations.
The second component of the allowance for loan losses requires
us to group loans that have similar credit risk characteristics
so as to form a basis for estimating probable losses inherent in
the group of loans based on historical loss percentages and
delinquency trends as it relates to the group. Management
assigns a quantitative allowance to these groups of loans by
utilizing historical loss experiences. Management also assigns a
qualitative allowance to these groups of loans in order to
adjust the historical data for qualitative factors that exist
currently that were not present in the historical data. These
qualitative factors include delinquency trends, loan
classification migration trends, economic and business
conditions, concentration of credit risk,
loan-to-value
ratios, problem loan trends and external factors. In deriving
the qualitative allowance management uses significant judgment
to qualitatively adjust the historical loss experiences for
current trends that existed at period end that were not
reflected in the calculated historical loss ratios and to adjust
the allowance for the changes in the current economic climate
compared to the economic environment that existed historically.
A subsequent change in data trends or the external environment
may result in material changes in this component of the
allowance from period to period.
Management believes that the allowance for loan losses reflects
a reasonable estimate of incurred credit losses as of the
statement of financial condition date. As of December 31,
2008, our allowance for loan losses was $137.3 million. See
Provision for Loan Losses for a discussion of the
amounts of our allowance assigned to each loan product. The
estimated allowance, which was derived from the above
methodology, may be significantly different from actual realized
losses. Actual losses incurred in the future are highly
dependent upon future events, including the economies of
geographic areas in which we hold loans, especially in Florida.
These factors are beyond managements control. Accordingly,
there is no assurance that we will not incur credit losses far
in excess of the amounts estimated by our allowance for loan
losses. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral
part of their examination process, periodically review our
allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require us to
recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments
and information available to them at the time of their
examination.
We analyze our loan portfolio by monitoring the loan mix, credit
quality,
loan-to-value
ratios, historical trends and economic conditions quarterly. As
a consequence, our allowance for loan losses estimates will
change from period to period. A portion of the change in our
loan loss estimates during the four year period ended
December 31, 2006 resulted from changes in credit policies
which focused our loan production on collateral based loans and
the discontinuation of certain loan products. We believe that
these changes reduced our allowance for loan losses as measured
by the decline in our allowance to loan losses to total loans
from 1.38% at December 31, 2002 to 0.94% at
December 31, 2006. During this period real estate markets
experienced significant price increases accompanied by an
abundance of available mortgage financing. We believe that these
external factors favorably impacted our provision for loan
losses and allowance for loan losses through this four year
period. During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008
the residential real estate market and general economic
conditions, both nationally and in Florida, rapidly deteriorated
with significant reductions in the sales prices and volume of
residential real estate sold. These rapidly deteriorating real
estate market conditions and adverse economic conditions
resulted in a significant increase in our ratio of allowance for
loan losses to total loans from 0.94% at December 31, 2006
to 2.87% at December 31, 2008. We believe that our earnings
in subsequent periods will be highly sensitive to changes in the
Florida real estate market as well as the length of the current
recession, availability of mortgage financing and the severity
of
220
unemployment in Florida. If the current negative real estate and
economic conditions continue or deteriorate further we are
likely to experience significantly increased credit losses.
Valuation
of investment securities
We record our securities available for sale and derivative
instruments in our statement of financial condition at fair
value. We also disclose fair value estimates in our statement of
financial condition for investment securities at cost. We
generally use market and income approach valuation techniques
and a fair value hierarchy to prioritize the inputs used in
valuation techniques. Our policy is to use quoted market prices
(Level 1 inputs) when available. However quoted market
prices are not available for our mortgage-backed securities,
REMICs, other securities and certain equity securities
requiring us to use Level 2 and Level 3 inputs. The
classification of assumptions as Level 2 or Level 3
inputs is based on judgment and the classification of the inputs
could change based on the availability of observable market data.
We subscribe to a third-party service to assist us in
determining the fair value of our mortgage-backed securities and
real estate mortgage conduits. The estimated fair value of these
securities at December 31, 2008 was $699.2 million. We
use matrix pricing to value these securities as identical
securities that we own are not traded on active markets. Matrix
pricing computes the fair value of mortgage-backed securities
and real estate mortgage conduits based on the coupon rate,
maturity date and estimates of future prepayment rates obtained
from trades of securities with similar characteristic and from
market data obtained from brokers. We consider the above inputs
Level 2. The valuations obtained from the matrix pricing
are not actual transactions and may not reflect the actual
amount that would be realized upon sale. While the interest rate
and prepayment assumptions used in the matrix pricing are
representative of assumptions that we believe market
participants would use in valuing these securities, different
assumptions may result in significantly different results.
Additionally, current observable data may not be available in
subsequent periods resulting in us obtaining level 3 inputs
to value these securities. The mortgage-backed and REMIC
securities that we own are government agency guaranteed with
minimal credit risk. These securities are of high credit quality
and we believe can be liquidated in the near future; however,
the price obtained upon sale could be higher or lower than the
fair value obtained through matrix pricing. In light of the
current volatility and uncertainty in credit markets, it is
difficult to estimate with accuracy the price that we could
obtain for these securities and the time that it could take to
sell them in an orderly transaction.
Included in our statement of financial condition in securities
available for sale as of December 31, 2008 was
$1.8 million of equity and debt securities that lack market
liquidity and trade in inactive markets. These securities are
fair valued through the use of non-binding broker quotes
(Level 3 inputs). As these quotes are non-binding and not
actual transactions, the values we have obtained may not reflect
the actual amount that would be realized upon sale. No current
market exists for these securities and the liquidation of these
securities is subject to significant uncertainty.
We disclosed the estimated fair value of our private investment
securities at $2.5 million in our statement of financial
condition. These securities represent investments in limited
partnerships that invest in equity securities based on
proprietary investment strategies or private placements. The
majority of the underlying equity securities investments of the
limited partnerships are publicly traded. The fair value of
these investments in our statement of financial condition was
obtained from the general partner or management of the private
placements (Level 3). These investments do not have readily
determinable fair values and the fair values calculated by us do
not represent actual transactions. Amounts realized upon the
sale of our interest in these investments may be higher or lower
than the amounts disclosed. No current market exists for these
securities and the liquidation of these securities is subject to
significant uncertainty.
Other-than-Temporary
Impairment of Securities
We perform an evaluation on a quarterly basis to determine if
any of our securities are
other-than-temporarily
impaired. In making this determination, we consider the extent
and duration of the impairment, the nature and financial
condition of the issuer and our ability and intent to hold
securities for a period sufficient
221
to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value. If a
security is determined to be
other-than-temporarily
impaired, we record an impairment loss as a charge to income for
the period in which the impairment loss is determined to exist,
resulting in a reduction to our earnings for that period. The
value of the Companys investment in private equity
securities has significantly declined during the year ended
December 31, 2008. As a consequence of our quarterly
evaluation, we recognized a $4.5 million permanent
impairment associated with these securities. The evaluation of
other-than-temporary
impairment of securities requires significant management
judgment on the financial condition of the issuer and the
ability of the issuer to recover the impairment. As of
December 31, 2008 the Company had $32.2 million of
impaired securities with an unrealized loss of
$1.0 million. We concluded the unrealized loss was
temporary due to what we believe to be the high credit quality
of these agency securities and our intent and ability to hold
these securities beyond the period of time when we believe the
impairment would be recovered. However, in light of the current
challenging economic and credit conditions, there is no
assurance that future events will not cause us to change this
conclusion or that the impairment would be recovered.
Impairment
of Goodwill and Long Lived Assets
We test goodwill for impairment annually or when events or
circumstances occur that my result in goodwill impairment during
interim periods. The test requires us to determine the fair
value of our reporting units and compare the reporting
units fair value to its carrying value. The Companys
reporting units are comprised of Community Banking, Commercial
Lending, Tax Certificate Operations, Capital Services and
Investment Operations. The fair values of the reporting units
are estimated using discounted cash flow present value valuation
models and market multiple techniques.
While management believes the sources utilized to arrive at the
fair value estimates are reliable, different sources or methods
could have yielded different fair value estimates. These fair
value estimates require a significant amount of judgment. If the
fair value of a reporting unit is below the carrying amount a
second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed. This
second step requires us to fair value all assets (recognized and
unrecognized) and liabilities in a manner similar to a purchase
price allocation. There is no active market for many of the
Companys assets requiring management to derive the fair
value of the majority of these assets using net present value
models. As a consequence, management estimates rely on
assumptions and judgments regarding issues where the outcome is
unknown and as a result actual results or values may differ
significantly from these estimates. Additionally, declines in
the market capitalization of the Companys common stock
affect the aggregate fair value of the reporting units. Changes
in managements valuation of its reporting units and the
underlying assets as well as declines in the Companys
market capitalization may affect future earnings through the
recognition of additional goodwill impairment charges of up to
$22.2 million.
During the year ended December 31, 2008 we recognized
goodwill impairment charges of $48.3 million. As of
December 31, 2008 our goodwill was $22.2 million.
In determining the fair value of the reporting units, the
Company used a combination of the discounted cash flow
techniques and market multiple methodologies. These methods
require assumptions for expected cash flows, discount rates, and
comparable financial institutions to determine market multiples.
The aggregate fair value of all reporting units derived from the
above valuation techniques was compared to the Companys
market capitalization adjusted for a control premium in order to
determine the reasonableness of the financial model output. A
control premium represents the value an investor would pay above
minority interest transaction prices in order to obtain a
controlling interest in the respective company. The values
separately derived from each valuation technique (i.e.,
discounted cash flow and market multiples) were used to develop
an overall estimate of a reporting units fair value.
Different weighting of the various fair value techniques could
result in a higher or lower fair value. Judgment is applied in
determining the weightings that are most representative of fair
value. The Company used financial projections over a period of
time considered necessary to achieve a steady state of cash
flows for each reporting unit. The primary assumptions in the
projections were anticipated loan and deposit growth, interest
rates and revenue growth. The discount rates were estimated
based on the Capital Asset Pricing Model, which considers the
risk-free interest rate, market risk premium, beta, and
unsystematic risk and size premium adjustments specific to a
particular reporting unit.
222
The estimated fair value of a reporting unit is highly sensitive
to changes in the discount rate and terminal value assumptions.
Minor changes in these assumptions could impact significantly
the fair value assigned to a reporting unit. Future potential
changes in these assumptions may impact the estimated fair value
of a reporting unit and cause the fair value of the reporting
unit to be below its carrying value.
When the estimated fair value of a reporting unit is below the
carrying value, goodwill may be impaired. In those situations
step-two of the goodwill impairment evaluation is performed
which involves calculating the implied fair value of the
reporting units goodwill. The implied fair value of
goodwill is determined in the same manner as it is determined in
a business combination. The fair value of the reporting
units assets and liabilities, including previously
unrecognized intangible assets, is individually determined. The
excess fair value of the reporting unit over the fair value of
the reporting units net assets is the implied goodwill.
Significant judgment and estimates are involved in estimating
the fair value of the assets and liabilities of the reporting
unit.
The value of the implied goodwill is highly sensitive to the
estimated fair value of the reporting units net assets.
The fair value of the reporting units net assets is
estimated using a variety of valuation techniques including the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
recent data observed in the market, including similar assets,
|
|
|
|
cash flow modeling based on projected cash flows and market
discount rates, and
|
|
|
|
estimated fair value of the underlying loan collateral.
|
The estimated fair values reflect the Companys assumptions
regarding how a market participant would value the net assets
and includes appropriate credit, liquidity, and market risk
premiums that are indicative of the current environment.
Currently, estimated liquidity and market risk premiums on
certain loan categories ranged from 3% to 25%; however, those
values are not actual transactions and may not reflect the
actual amount that would be realized upon sale. If the implied
fair value of the goodwill for the reporting unit exceeds the
carrying value of the goodwill for the respective reporting
unit, no goodwill impairment is recorded. Changes in the
estimated fair value of the individual assets and liabilities
may result in a different amount of implied goodwill, and the
amount of goodwill impairment, if any. Future changes in the
fair value of the reporting units net assets may result in
future goodwill impairment.
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset may not be recoverable. When testing a long-lived asset
for recoverability, it may be necessary to review estimated
lives and adjust the depreciation period. Changes in
circumstances and the estimates of future cash flows as well as
evaluating estimated lives of long-lived assets are subjective
and involve a significant amount of judgment. A change in the
estimated life of a long-lived asset may substantially increase
depreciation and amortization expense in subsequent periods. For
purposes of recognition and measurement of an impairment loss,
we are required to group long-lived assets at the lowest level
for which identifiable cash flows are independent of other
assets. These cash flows are based on projections from
management reports which are based on subjective
interdepartmental allocations. Fair values are not available for
many of our long-lived assets, and estimates must be based on
available information, including prices of similar assets and
present value valuation techniques using level 3
unobservable inputs. Long-lived assets subject to the above
impairment analysis included property and equipment,
internal-use software, real estate held for development and sale
and real estate owned.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, we halted our
store expansion program, consolidated back-office facilities,
terminated or subleased certain operating lease contracts and
reduced our store operating hours. As a consequence, we
recognized an impairment charge of $7.4 million. A portion
of the impairment charge is based on the fair value of real
estate, equipment and unfavorable contracts. These fair value
amounts were based on market-based estimates and net present
value models. These estimates and assumptions are highly
subjective and based on significant management estimates. The
amount ultimately realized upon the sale of these properties or
the termination of these unfavorable contracts may be
significantly different than the recorded amounts. The
assumptions used are representative of assumptions that we
believe market
223
participants would use in fair valuing these assets or lease
contracts, while different assumptions may result in
significantly different results.
Accounting
for Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowance
The Company reviews the carrying amount of its deferred tax
assets quarterly to determine if the establishment of a
valuation allowance is necessary. If, based on the available
evidence, it is more-likely-than-not that all or a portion of
the Companys deferred tax assets will not be realized, a
deferred tax valuation allowance would be established.
Consideration is given to all positive and negative evidence
related to the realization of the deferred tax assets.
In evaluating the available evidence, management considered
historical financial performance, expectation of future
earnings, length of statutory carry forward periods, experience
with operating loss and tax credit carry forwards not expiring
unused, tax planning strategies and timing of reversals of
temporary differences. Significant judgment is required in
assessing future earnings trends and the timing of reversals of
temporary differences. The Companys evaluation is based on
current tax laws as well as managements expectations of
future performance based on its strategic initiatives. Changes
in existing tax laws and future results differing from
expectations may result in significant changes in the deferred
tax assets valuation allowance.
Based on our evaluation as of December 31, 2008, a net
deferred tax asset valuation allowance was established for the
entire amount of the Companys net deferred tax assets as
the realization of these assets did not meet the
more-likely-than-not criteria of statement of financial
accounting standard No. 109. During the fourth quarter of
2008, market conditions in the financial services industry
significantly deteriorated with the bankruptcies and government
bail-outs of large financial services entities. This market
turmoil led to a tightening of credit, lack of consumer
confidence, increased market volatility and widespread reduction
in business activity. These economic conditions adversely
effected BankAtlantics profitable lines of business and it
does not appear that these challenging market conditions are
likely to improve in the foreseeable future. As a consequence of
the worsening economic conditions during the fourth quarter of
2008, it appeared more-likely-than-not that the Company would
not realize its deferred tax assets resulting in a deferred tax
asset valuation allowance for the entire amount of the
Companys net deferred tax assets. However, significant
judgment is required in evaluating the positive and negative
evidence for the establishment of the deferred tax asset
valuation allowance, and if future events differ from
expectations or if there are changes in the tax laws, a
substantial portion or the entire deferred tax asset benefit may
be realized in the future. The Companys net deferred tax
assets can be carried forward for 20 years and applied to
offset future taxable income.
Dividends
In February 2009, the Company elected to exercise its right to
defer payments of interest on its trust preferred junior
subordinated debt. During the deferral period, the Company is
not permitted to pay dividends to its common shareholders. The
Company can end the deferral period at any time by paying all
accrued and unpaid interest. Further, the availability of funds
for dividend payments generally depends upon BankAtlantics
ability to pay cash dividends to the Company. Current
regulations applicable to the payment of cash dividends by
savings institutions impose limits on capital distributions
based on an institutions regulatory capital levels,
retained net income and net income. The Company does not expect
to receive cash dividends from BankAtlantic during 2009, and
possibly longer.
Real
Estate Development
The Real Estate Development activities of BFC are comprised
of the operations of Woodbridge and its subsidiaries. See the
section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus below entitled
Woodbridges Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
224
INFORMATION
ABOUT WOODBRIDGE
Certain of the information contained within this
Information About Woodbridge section has been
derived or excerpted from Woodbridges Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the SEC on
March 19, 2009, Amendment No. 1 to Woodbridges
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the SEC on
April 30, 2009, and Woodridges Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, filed with the SEC on
August 10, 2009. Unless the context otherwise requires,
references to we, us, our,
the Company and Woodbridge within this
Information About Woodbridge section refer to
Woodbridge Holdings Corporation and its consolidated
subsidiaries.
BUSINESS
General
Description of Business
Woodbridge, directly and through its wholly owned subsidiaries,
historically has been a real estate development company with
activities in the Southeastern United States. We were organized
in December 1982 under the laws of the State of Florida.
Historically, our operations were primarily within the real
estate industry; however, our recent business strategy has
included the pursuit of investments and acquisitions within or
outside of the real estate industry, as well as the continued
development of master-planned communities. Under this business
model, we likely will not generate a consistent earnings stream
and the composition of our revenues may vary widely due to
factors inherent in a particular investment, including the
maturity and cyclical nature of, and market conditions relating
to, the business invested in. Net investment gains and other
income will be based primarily on the success of our investments
as well as overall market conditions.
Business
Segments
In 2008, Woodbridge engaged in business activities through the
Land Division, consisting of the operations of Core Communities,
which develops master-planned communities, and through the Other
Operations segment (Other Operations), which
includes the parent company operations of Woodbridge (the
Parent Company), the consolidated operations of
Pizza Fusion, the consolidated operations of Carolina Oak Homes,
LLC (Carolina Oak), which engaged in homebuilding in
South Carolina prior to the suspension of those activities
during the fourth quarter of 2008, and other activities through
Cypress Creek Capital Holdings, LLC (Cypress Creek
Capital) and Snapper Creek Equity Management, LLC
(Snapper Creek). An equity investment in Bluegreen
and an investment in Office Depot are also included in the Other
Operations segment.
Until November 9, 2007, the Company also engaged in
homebuilding activities through Levitt and Sons, LLC
(Levitt and Sons) and reported results of operations
through two additional reporting segments, Primary Homebuilding
and Tennessee Homebuilding. On November 9, 2007, Levitt and
Sons filed a voluntary bankruptcy petition and, accordingly, the
Company deconsolidated Levitt and Sons as of that date. As a
result of the deconsolidation of Levitt and Sons, the results of
operations of the Primary Homebuilding segment, with the
exception of Carolina Oak, and Tennessee Homebuilding segments
were only included as separate segments through November 9,
2007, the date of Woodbridges deconsolidation of Levitt
and Sons (see Note 24 to our audited consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus for financial information of Levitt and
Sons). The presentation and allocation of the assets,
liabilities and results of operations of each segment may not
reflect the actual economic costs of the segment as a
stand-alone business. If a different basis of allocation were
utilized, the relative contributions of the segment might differ
but, in managements view, the relative trends in segments
would not likely be impacted.
Land
Division
Core Communities was founded in May 1996 to develop a
master planned community in Port St. Lucie, Florida
now known as St. Lucie West. Historically, its activities
focused on the development of a master-planned community in Port
St. Lucie, Florida called Tradition, Florida and a community
outside of Hardeeville, South Carolina called Tradition Hilton
Head. Tradition, Florida has been in active development for
several years, while Tradition Hilton Head is in the early stage
of development. As a master-planned community developer, Core
Communities engages in four primary activities: (i) the
acquisition of large tracts
225
of raw land; (ii) planning, entitlement and infrastructure
development; (iii) the sale of entitled land
and/or
developed lots to homebuilders and commercial, industrial and
institutional end-users; and (iv) the development and
leasing of commercial space to commercial, industrial and
institutional end-users.
St. Lucie West is a 4,600 acre master-planned community
located in St. Lucie County, Florida. It is bordered by
Interstate 95 to the west and Floridas Turnpike to the
east. The community blends residential, commercial and
industrial developments where residents have access to commerce,
recreation, entertainment, religious, and educational facilities
all within the community. St. Lucie West is completely sold out
and substantially built out. There are more than 6,000 homes in
St. Lucie West housing nearly 15,000 residents.
Tradition, Florida encompasses more than 8,200 total acres and
is planned to include a 4.5-mile long employment corridor along
I-95, educational and health care facilities, commercial
properties, residential developments and other uses in a series
of mixed-use parcels. As part of the employment corridor, a
120-acre
research park is being marketed as the Florida Center for
Innovation at Tradition (FCI), within which the
Torrey Pines Institute for Molecular Studies (TPIMS) has built
its new headquarters. FCI is planned to consist of just under
two million square feet of research and development space, a 300
bed Martin Memorial Health Systems hospital, a
27-acre lake
with a
1-mile
fitness trail and recreational amenities,
state-of-the-art
fiber optic cabling, underground electrical power and proximity
to high-quality housing, restaurants, hotels and shopping. Mann
Research Center also purchased a 22.4 acre parcel within
the FCI on which it intends to build a 400,000-square-foot life
sciences complex. Oregon Health & Science
Universitys Vaccine and Gene Therapy Institute also
announced plans to locate a 120,000-square-foot facility within
FCI. Special assessment bonds are being utilized to provide
financing for certain infrastructure developments.
Tradition Hilton Head encompasses almost 5,400 total acres and
is currently entitled for up to 9,500 residential units and
1.5 million square feet of commercial space, in addition to
recreational areas, educational facilities and emergency
services.
Our Land Division recorded $11.3 million in sales in 2008
compared to $16.6 million in 2007 as demand for residential
and commercial inventory in Florida remained slow. The overall
slowdown in the real estate markets and disruptions in credit
markets continue to have a negative effect on demand for
residential land in our Land Division which historically was
partially mitigated by increased commercial leasing revenue.
Traffic at the Tradition, Florida information center remains
slow, reflecting the overall state of the Florida real estate
market. In response to these market conditions, the Land
Division has concentrated on commercial property. In addition to
sales of parcels to developers, the Land Division plans to
continue to internally develop certain projects for leasing to
third parties subject to market demand. Core generated higher
revenues in 2008 compared to 2007 due to increased rental income
associated with the leasing of certain commercial properties and
increased revenues relating to irrigation services provided to
homebuilders, commercial users, and the residents of Tradition,
Florida. Retailers at Tradition, Florida include nationally
branded retail stores such as Target, Babies R Us, Bed, Bath and
Beyond, Office Max, The Sports Authority, TJ Maxx, Petsmart, LA
Fitness and Old Navy.
Our Land Divisions land in development and relevant data
as of December 31, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Acres
|
|
Closed
|
|
Current
|
|
Saleable
|
|
Saleable
|
|
Acres
|
|
Acres
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
Acquired
|
|
Acres(a)
|
|
Inventory
|
|
Acres(b)
|
|
Acres(b)
|
|
Backlog
|
|
Available
|
|
Currently in Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tradition, Florida
|
|
1998 2004
|
|
|
8,246
|
|
|
|
1,831
|
|
|
|
6,415
|
|
|
|
2,583
|
|
|
|
3,832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,832
|
|
Tradition Hilton Head
|
|
2005
|
|
|
5,390
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
5,224
|
|
|
|
2,417
|
|
|
|
2,807
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
2,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Currently in Development
|
|
|
|
|
13,636
|
|
|
|
1,997
|
|
|
|
11,639
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
6,639
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
6,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Closed acres for Tradition Hilton Head include 150 acres
owned by Carolina Oak, a wholly owned subsidiary of Woodbridge.
The revenue from this sale was eliminated in consolidation. |
226
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Actual saleable and non-saleable acres may vary over time due to
changes in zoning, project design, or other factors.
Non-saleable acres include, but are not limited to, areas set
aside for roads, parks, schools, utilities, wetlands and other
public purposes. |
Other
Operations
Other Operations consist of the operations of our Parent
Company, Carolina Oak, and Pizza Fusion, other activities
through Cypress Creek Capital and Snapper Creek, our equity
investment in Bluegreen and an investment in Office Depot.
Investment
in Bluegreen Corporation
We own approximately 9.5 million shares of the outstanding
common stock of Bluegreen, which represents approximately 31% of
that companys issued and outstanding common stock.
Bluegreen is a leading provider of vacation and residential
lifestyle choices through its resorts and residential community
businesses. Bluegreen is organized into two divisions: Bluegreen
Resorts and Bluegreen Communities.
Bluegreen Resorts acquires, develops and markets vacation
ownership interests (VOIs) in resorts generally
located in popular high-volume, drive-to vacation
destinations. Bluegreen Communities acquires, develops and
subdivides property and markets residential land homesites, the
majority of which are sold directly to retail customers who seek
to build a home in a high quality residential setting, in some
cases on properties featuring a golf course and related
amenities.
Bluegreen also generates significant interest income through its
financing of individual purchasers of VOIs and, to a nominal
extent, homesites sold by its Bluegreen Communities division.
During 2008, we began evaluating our investment in Bluegreen on
a quarterly basis for
other-than-temporary
impairments in accordance with FASB Staff Position
(FSP)
FAS 115-1/FAS 124-1,
The Meaning of
Other-than-Temporary
Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments
(FSP
FAS 115-1/FAS 124-1),
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 18, The
Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common
Stock, and Securities and Exchange (SEC)
Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 59. These
evaluations generally include an analysis of various
quantitative and qualitative factors relating to the performance
of Bluegreen and its stock price. We value Bluegreens
common stock using a market approach valuation technique and
Level 1 valuation inputs under SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS No. 157). Based on the results of
our evaluations during the quarters ended September 30,
2008, December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009, we
determined that
other-than-temporary
impairments were necessary for those periods. As a result, we
recorded impairment charges of $53.6 million,
$40.8 million and $20.4 million during the quarters
ended September 30, 2008, December 31, 2008 and
March 31, 2009, respectively. Based on our impairment
evaluation performed during the quarter ended June 30,
2009, we determined that our investment in Bluegreen was not
impaired at June 30, 2009. As of June 30, 2009, the
carrying value of our investment in Bluegreen was
$28.6 million.
Bluegreen has announced that it is implementing strategic
initiatives in order to conserve cash that will significantly
reduce sales, eliminate certain marketing programs, and reduce
capital spending and overhead by eliminating a significant
number of employees, among other things. During the fourth
quarter of 2008, Bluegreen recorded $15.6 million in
restructuring charges in connection with the implementation of
these initiatives and recorded an $8.5 million impairment
charge related to its goodwill.
Investment
in Office Depot
During March 2008, we, together with Woodbridge Equity
Fund LLLP, a newly formed limited liability limited
partnership wholly-owned by us, purchased 3,000,200 shares
of Office Depot common stock, which represented approximately
one percent of Office Depots outstanding stock. These
Office Depot shares were acquired at an average price of $11.33
per share for an aggregate purchase price of approximately
$34.0 million. During June 2008, we sold
1,565,200 shares of Office Depot common stock at an average
price of $12.08 per share for an aggregate sales price of
approximately $18.9 million.
227
During the quarters ended December 31 2008, March 31, 2009
and June 30, 2009, we performed impairment analyses of our
investment in Office Depot. The impairment analyses included an
evaluation of, among other things, qualitative and quantitative
factors relating to the performance of Office Depot and its
stock price. As a result of these evaluations, we determined
that
other-than-temporary
impairment charges were required at December 31, 2008 and
March 31, 2009 and recorded a $12.0 million impairment
charge relating to our investment in Office Depot in the three
months ended December 31, 2008 and an additional
$2.4 million impairment charge in the three months ended
March 31, 2009. Based on our impairment evaluation
performed during the quarter ended June 30, 2009, we
determined that its investment in Office Depot was not impaired
at June 30, 2009. As of June 30, 2009, the carrying
value of our investment in Office Depot was $6.5 million.
On August 6, 2009, the closing price of Office Depots
common stock was $5.06 per share.
Acquisition
of Pizza Fusion
Pizza Fusion is a restaurant franchise which was founded in 2006
and which operates in a niche market within the quick service
and organic food industries. As of June 30, 2009, Pizza
Fusion was operating 20 locations throughout the United States
and had entered into franchise agreements to open an additional
9 stores by February 2010.
On September 18, 2008, we, indirectly through our
wholly-owned subsidiary, PF Program Partnership, LP (formerly
Woodbridge Equity Fund II LP), purchased for an aggregate
of $3.0 million, 2,608,696 shares of Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock of Pizza Fusion, together with
warrants to purchase up to 1,500,000 additional shares of
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of Pizza Fusion at an
exercise price of $1.44 per share. We also received options,
exercisable on or prior to September 18, 2009, to purchase
up to 521,740 additional shares of Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock of Pizza Fusion at a price of $1.15 per share,
and we exercised these options on July 2, 2009 for an
aggregate purchase price of $600,000. Upon the exercise of the
options, we were also granted warrants to purchase up to 300,000
additional shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
of Pizza Fusion at an exercise price of $1.44 per share. The
warrants have a term of 10 years, subject to earlier
expiration under certain circumstances.
During 2008, we evaluated our investment in Pizza Fusion under
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities (FIN No. 46(R)),
and determined that Pizza Fusion is a variable interest entity.
Furthermore, on a fully diluted basis, our investment represents
a significant interest in Pizza Fusion and, therefore, we are
expected to bear the majority of the variability of the risks
and rewards of Pizza Fusion. Additionally, as shareholder of the
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of Pizza Fusion, we
have control over the board of directors of Pizza Fusion. Based
upon these factors, we concluded that we are the primary
beneficiary. Accordingly, under purchase accounting, we have
consolidated the assets and liabilities of Pizza Fusion in
accordance with SFAS No. 141 Business
Combinations. We will continue to review our primary
beneficiary status for any potential changes in ownership or
capital structure that may cause us to reconsider whether we
should continue to consolidate the financial statements of Pizza
Fusion. The assets of Pizza Fusion are not available to us.
Carolina
Oak
In 2007, we acquired from Levitt and Sons all of the outstanding
membership interests in Carolina Oak, a South Carolina limited
liability company (formerly known as Levitt and Sons of Jasper
County, LLC), for the following consideration:
(i) assumption of the outstanding principal balance of a
loan in the amount of $34.1 million which is collateralized
by a 150 acre parcel of land owned by Carolina Oak located
in Tradition Hilton Head, (ii) execution of a promissory
note in the amount of $400,000 to serve as a deposit under a
purchase agreement between Carolina Oak and Core Communities of
South Carolina, LLC and (iii) the assumption of specified
payables in the amount of approximately $5.3 million.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, as a result of, among other
things, a further deterioration in consumer confidence, an
overall softening of demand for new homes, a decline in the
overall economy, increasing unemployment, a deterioration in the
credit markets, and the direct and indirect impact of the
turmoil in the mortgage loan market, we made a decision to
suspend Carolina Oaks homebuilding activities until the
228
residential housing market improves. Consequently, the purchase
agreement between Carolina Oak and Core Communities of South
Carolina was canceled and the $400,000 deposit was forfeited.
Carolina Oak sold and delivered 8 units during 2008 and, as
of December 31, 2008, had 6 completed unsold units.
Carolina Oak has an additional 91 lots that are ready and
available for home construction. The community was originally
planned to consist of approximately 403 additional units.
However, there can be no assurance as to when homebuilding
activities in this community will be resumed.
At December 31, 2008, we reviewed Carolina Oak
projects inventory of real estate for impairment in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
(SFAS No. 144). The estimated fair
market value of the project was determined based on an appraisal
performed by an independent third party. The independent
appraisal considered, among other things, general economic
conditions, competition in the market where the community is
located, alternative product offerings that may impact sales
price, the number of homes that can be built on the site, and
alternative uses for the property such as the possibility of a
sale of the entire community to another builder or the sale of
individual home sites. We assessed the fair value of the project
based on the appraisal performed by a third party because we
believe an independent appraisal is the best estimate in
determining fair value under the current circumstances. As a
result of the analysis, we recorded an impairment charge of
$3.5 million in cost of sales for the year ended
December 31, 2008, which is reflected in the Other
Operations segment.
As previously reported, the results of operations and financial
condition of Carolina Oak as of and for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 were included in the Primary
Homebuilding segment because its financial metrics were similar
in nature to the other homebuilding projects within that
segment. However, due to our acquisition of Carolina Oak and the
deconsolidation of Levitt and Sons, which comprised our Primary
and Tennessee Homebuilding segments, as of November 9,
2007, the results of operations and financial condition of
Carolina Oak as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008
are included in the Other Operations segment.
Corporate
Headquarters
Through May 2008, our 80,000 square foot office building
served as our corporate office in Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
We relocated our corporate headquarters to a smaller space at
the BankAtlantic corporate offices pursuant to a sublease
agreement with BFC. Our previous corporate headquarters building
is currently 50% occupied by an unaffiliated third party
pursuant to a lease which expires in 2010. We will continue to
seek to lease the vacated space in our former corporate
headquarters to third parties, including our affiliates, in
2009. We evaluated the former corporate headquarters office
building for impairment in accordance with
SFAS No. 144 and determined that the carrying value
approximated fair value and, therefore, no impairment was deemed
necessary.
Other
Investments and Joint Ventures
In the past we have sought to mitigate the risks associated with
certain real estate projects by entering into joint ventures.
We entered into an indemnity agreement in April 2004 with a
joint venture partner at Altman Longleaf relating to, among
other obligations, that partners guarantee of the joint
ventures indebtedness. Our liability under the indemnity
agreement was limited to the amount of any distributions from
the joint venture which exceeds our original capital and other
contributions. Levitt Commercial, LLC, our wholly-owned
subsidiary (Levitt Commercial) owned a 20% interest
in Altman Longleaf, LLC, which owned a 20% interest in this
joint venture. This joint venture developed a
298-unit
apartment complex in Melbourne, Florida, with construction
commencing in 2004 and ending in 2006. An affiliate of our joint
venture partner was the general contractor. Our original capital
contributions totaled approximately $585,000 and we have
received approximately $1.2 million in distributions since
2004. In December 2008, our interest in the joint venture was
sold and we received approximately $182,000 as a result of the
sale and we were released from any potential obligation of
indemnity which may have arisen in connection with the joint
venture.
229
Levitt
Commercial
In 2007, our Other Operations segment also consisted of Levitt
Commercial, which was formed in 2001 to develop industrial,
commercial, retail and residential properties. In 2007, Levitt
Commercial ceased development activities after it sold all of
its remaining units. Levitt Commercials revenues for the
year ended December 31, 2007 amounted to $6.6 million
which reflected the delivery of the remaining 17 flex warehouse
units at its remaining development project.
Homebuilding
Division
Acquired in December 1999, Levitt and Sons was a developer of
single family homes and townhome communities for active adults
and families in Florida, Georgia, Tennessee and South Carolina.
Levitt and Sons operated in two reportable segments, Primary
Homebuilding and Tennessee Homebuilding.
Increased inventory levels combined with weakened consumer
demand for housing and tightened credit requirements has
negatively affected sales, deliveries and margins throughout the
homebuilding industry. In both the Primary Homebuilding and
Tennessee Homebuilding segments, Levitt and Sons experienced
decreased orders, decreased margins and increased cancellation
rates on homes in backlog. Excess supply, particularly in
previously strong markets like Florida, in combination with a
reduction in demand resulting from tightened credit requirements
and reductions in credit availability, as well as buyers
fears about the direction of the market, exerted a continuous
cycle of downward pricing pressure for residential homes.
On November 9, 2007 (the Petition Date), Levitt
and Sons and substantially all of its subsidiaries
(collectively, the Debtors) filed voluntary
petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of
the United States Code (the Chapter 11 Cases)
in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District
of Florida (the Bankruptcy Court). The Debtors
commenced the Chapter 11 Cases in order to preserve the
value of their assets and to facilitate an orderly wind-down of
their businesses and disposition of their assets in a manner
intended to maximize the recoveries of all constituents.
In connection with the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases, we
deconsolidated Levitt and Sons as of November 9, 2007,
eliminating all future operations from our financial results of
operations. As a result of the deconsolidation of Levitt and
Sons, in accordance with Accounting Research Bulletin
(ARB) No. 51, Consolidated Financial
Statements (ARB No. 51), we recorded
our interest in Levitt and Sons under the cost method of
accounting. Under cost method accounting, income is recognized
only to the extent of cash received in the future or when Levitt
and Sons is legally released from its bankruptcy obligations
through the approval of the Bankruptcy Court, at which time any
recorded loss in excess of the investment in Levitt and Sons can
be recognized into income. As of November 9, 2007,
Woodbridge had a negative investment in Levitt and Sons of
$123.0 million and there were outstanding advances due from
Levitt and Sons of $67.8 million at Woodbridge resulting in
a net negative investment of $55.2 million. Included in the
negative investment was approximately $15.8 million
associated with deferred revenue related to intra-segment sales
between Levitt and Sons and Core Communities. During the fourth
quarter of 2008, the Company identified approximately
$2.3 million of deferred revenue on intercompany sales
between Core and Carolina Oak that had been misclassified
against the negative investment in Levitt and Sons. As a result,
the Company recorded a $2.3 million reclassification
between inventory of real estate and the loss in excess of
investment in subsidiary in the consolidated statements of
financial condition. As a result, as of December 31, 2008,
the net negative investment was $52.9 million. During the
pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases, we also incurred certain
administrative costs in the amount of $1.6 million and
$748,000 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, relating to certain services and benefits provided
by us in favor of the Debtors. These costs included the cost of
maintaining employee benefit plans, providing accounting
services, human resources expenses, general liability and
property insurance premiums, payroll processing expenses,
licensing and third-party professional fees (collectively, the
Post Petition Services).
As previously reported, the results of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2007 included the results of operations
for the Debtors through November 9, 2007, with the
exception of Carolina Oak, which was included for the full year
in 2007 as it was not part of the Chapter 11 Cases as
discussed above.
230
Recent
Developments
Bankruptcy
of Levitt and Sons
On February 20, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court presiding over
Levitt and Sons Chapter 11 bankruptcy case entered an
order confirming a plan of liquidation jointly proposed by
Levitt and Sons and the Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors. That order also approved the settlement pursuant to
the settlement agreement we entered into on June 27, 2008.
No appeal or rehearing of the courts order was timely
filed by any party, and the settlement was consummated on
March 3, 2009, at which time, payment was made in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the settlement
agreement. Under cost method accounting, the cost of settlement
and the related $52.9 million liability (less $500,000
which was determined as the settlement holdback and remained as
an accrual pursuant to the settlement agreement) was recognized
into income in the first quarter of 2009, resulting in a
$40.4 million gain on settlement of investment in
subsidiary.
Executive
Compensation Program
On September 29, 2008, our Board of Directors approved the
terms of incentive programs for certain of our employees
including certain of our named executive officers, pursuant to
which a portion of their compensation will be based on the cash
returns realized by us on our investments. The programs relate
to the performance of existing investments and new investments
designated by the Board (together, the Investments).
All of our investments have been or will be held by individual
limited partnerships or other legal entities established for
such purpose. Participating executives and employees will have
interests in the entities, which will be the basis of their
incentives under the programs. Our named executive officers may
have interests tied both to the performance of a particular
investment as well as interests relating to the performance of
the portfolio of investments as a whole.
Woodbridge, in its capacity as investor in the investment
program, will be entitled to receive a return of its invested
capital and a specified rate of return on its invested capital
prior to our executive officers or employees being entitled to
receive any portion of the realized profits (the share to which
they may be entitled is referred to as the Carried
Interest). For existing investments, the amount of
invested capital was determined as of September 1, 2008, by
our Board of Directors. Once we receive our priority return of
our invested capital and the stated return (which accrues from
September 1, 2008), we will also generally be entitled to
additional amounts that provide it with (i) at least
approximately 87% of the aggregate proceeds related to our
status as an investor in excess of our invested capital in that
investment, plus (ii) at least 35% of all other amounts
earned from third parties with respect to that investment (i.e.,
income not related to our status as an investor, such as
management fees charged to third parties). The remaining
proceeds will be available under the incentive programs for
distribution among those employees directly responsible for the
relevant Investments and our executive officers. The
compensation committee of our Board of Directors will determine
the allocations to our named executive officers. These
allocations are identified in advance for each of the executive
officers. Although the compensation committee can alter these
allocations on a prospective basis, the total amount payable to
employees and officers cannot be changed. Management will
determine the amounts to be allocated among the other employee
participants. The incentive programs relating to both individual
investments and the program established for the executive
officers with respect to the overall performance of the
portfolio of investments contain clawback obligations that are
intended to reduce the risk that the participants will be
distributed amounts under the programs prior to our receipt of
at least a return of our invested capital and the stated return.
To the extent that named executive officers participate in the
performance of a particular investment, their clawback
obligations nevertheless refer to the performance of the
portfolio as a whole. The programs contemplate that the clawback
obligations will be funded solely from holdback accounts
established with respect to each participant. Amounts equal to a
portion of Carried Interest distribution to such participant
(initially 25% and which can be increased, when appropriate, to
as high as 75%) will be deposited into holdback accounts or
otherwise made available for our benefit. There are also general
vesting and forfeiture provisions applicable to each
participants right to receive any Carried Interest, the
terms of which may vary by individual. Our Board of Directors
believes that the above-described incentive plans appropriately
align payments to participants with the performance of our
investments.
231
The Executive Incentive Plan which sets forth the
terms of the Carried Interests of certain executive officers in
the performance of the overall investments of Woodbridge and the
Investment Programs entered into to date which set
forth the Carried Interests of employees and certain executive
officers in the performance of particular individual investments
are included as exhibits to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008. Those documents
(rather than the general descriptions contained herein) embody
the legally binding terms of the incentive arrangements, which
were executed on March 13, 2009.
Acquisition
of Pizza Fusion
On September 18, 2008, we, indirectly through our
wholly-owned subsidiary, PF Program Partnership, LP (formerly
Woodbridge Equity Fund II LP), purchased for an aggregate
of $3.0 million, 2,608,696 shares of Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock of Pizza Fusion, together with
warrants to purchase up to 1,500,000 additional shares of
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of Pizza Fusion at an
exercise price of $1.44 per share. We also received options,
exercisable on or prior to September 18, 2009, to purchase
up to 521,740 additional shares of Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock of Pizza Fusion at a price of $1.15 per share,
and we exercised these options on July 2, 2009 for an
aggregate purchase price of $600,000. Upon the exercise of the
options, we were also granted warrants to purchase up to 300,000
additional shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
of Pizza Fusion at an exercise price of $1.44 per share. The
warrants have a term of 10 years, subject to earlier
expiration under certain circumstances.
Formation
of Broker Dealer Subsidiary
As part of our strategy to access alternative financing sources
and to pursue opportunities within the capital markets, we have
taken steps to form various subsidiaries, including a broker
dealer. We envision that these subsidiaries will generate fee
income from private or public offerings that will be marketed to
investors through broker dealer networks. Amongst the possible
investment opportunities is a program that we are currently
exploring with Bluegreen in which the funds raised would be
invested in its timeshare receivables. While the formation of
this program is in the early stages, the expectation is that a
newly formed entity would acquire Bluegreen receivables and
issue securities in a public offering. Bluegreen has agreed to
reimburse us for certain expenses, including legal and
professional fees, incurred by us in connection with this
effort. There is, however, no assurance that we will be
successful in the venture or that the business will be
profitable for us.
Reclassification
of Discontinued Operations
In June 2007, Core Communities began soliciting bids from
several potential buyers to purchase assets associated with two
of Cores commercial leasing projects (the
Projects). As the criteria for assets held for sale
had been met in accordance with SFAS No. 144, the
assets were reclassified to assets held for sale and the
liabilities related to those assets were reclassified to
liabilities related to assets held for sale in prior periods.
The results of operations for these assets were reclassified as
discontinued operations in the third quarter of 2007 and we
ceased recording depreciation expense on these Projects. During
the fourth quarter of 2008, we determined that given the
difficulty in predicting the timing or probability of a sale of
these assets associated with the Projects as a result of, among
other things, the economic downturn and disruptions in credit
markets, the requirements of SFAS No. 144 necessary to
classify these assets held for sale and to be included in
discontinued operations were no longer met and management could
not assert the Projects can be sold within a year. Therefore,
the results of operations for these Projects were reclassified
for the three years ending December 31, 2008 back into
continuing operations in the consolidated statements of
operations. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, we
recorded a depreciation recapture of $3.2 million at
December 31, 2008 to account for the depreciation not
recorded while the assets were classified as discontinued
operations. Total assets and liabilities related to the Projects
were $92.7 million and $76.1 million, respectively,
for the year ended December 31, 2008, and
$96.2 million and 80.1 million, respectively, for the
year ended December 31, 2007. In addition, total revenues
related to the Projects for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007 and
232
2006 were $8.7 million, $4.7 million and
$1.8 million, respectively, while income (loss) related to
the assets for the same periods in 2008, 2007 and 2006 was
$6.0 million, $1.8 million and $(21,000), respectively.
Business
Strategy
Our business strategy involves the following principal goals:
Continue to develop master-planned
communities. While The Land Divisions
strategy has generally been focused on the development of its
master-planned communities in Florida and South Carolina,
current economic conditions have required that development
activities be reduced to a minimum. As supply and demand for
both commercial and residential development approach a more
reasonable balance, Core will further evaluate its position to
determine when it may be economically feasible to once again
initiate more expansive development activities than currently
exist. Nevertheless, Core continues to market parcels to
homebuilders, and the Land Division continues to focus on its
commercial operations through sales to developers and through
its efforts to internally develop projects for leasing to third
parties. A major component of Cores long term strategy is
the development of communities that will responsibly serve its
residents and businesses. The overall goal of its developments
is to facilitate a regional roadway network and establish model
communities that will set an example for future development.
Core has established a series of community design standards
which have been incorporated into the overall planning effort of
master-planned communities including: utilizing a mix of housing
types, including single-family neighborhoods and a variety of
higher density communities; and having a neighborhood Town
Center, Community School parcels, a workplace environment and
community parks. The intent is to establish well-planned,
innovative communities that are sustainable for the long-term.
We view our commercial projects opportunistically and intend to
periodically evaluate the short and long term benefits of
retention or disposition. Margins on land sales and the many
factors which impact the margin have and may continue to fall
below historical levels given the current downturn in the real
estate markets. Recent trends in home sales may require us to
continue to hold our land inventory longer than originally
projected. We intend to review each parcel ready for development
to determine whether to market the parcel to third parties, to
internally develop the parcel for leasing, or hold the parcel
and determine later whether to pursue third party sales or
internal development opportunities. Our decision will be based,
in part, on the condition of the commercial real estate market
and our evaluation of future prospects. Our land development
activities in our master-planned communities offer a source of
land for future homebuilding by others. Much of our
master-planned community acreage is under varying development
orders and is not immediately available for construction or sale
to third parties at prices that maximize value. Third-party
homebuilder sales remain an important part of our ongoing
strategy to generate cash flow, maximize returns and diversify
risk, as well as to create appropriate housing alternatives for
different market segments in our master-planned communities.
Operate efficiently and effectively. We raised
a significant amount of capital in 2007 through a rights
offering and have implemented significant reductions in
workforce levels. We intend to continue our focus on aligning
our staffing levels with business goals and current and
anticipated future market conditions. We also intend to continue
to focus on expense management initiatives throughout the
organization.
Pursue investment opportunities. We intend to
pursue acquisitions and investments, using a combination of our
cash and stock and third party equity and debt financing. These
investments may be within or outside of the real estate industry
and may also include investments with affiliated entities. We
also intend to explore a variety of funding structures which
might leverage or capitalize on our available cash and other
assets currently owned by us. We may acquire entire businesses,
or majority or minority, non-controlling interests in companies.
Investing on this basis will present additional risks, including
the risks inherent in the industries in which we invest and
potential integration risks if we seek to integrate the acquired
operations into our operations.
233
Seasonality
We have historically experienced volatility, but not necessarily
seasonality, in our results of operations from
quarter-to-quarter
due to the nature of the real estate business. Historically,
land sale revenues have been sporadic and have fluctuated
dramatically. In addition, margins on land sales and the many
factors which impact margins may remain below historical levels
given the current downturn in the real estate markets where we
own properties. We are focusing on maximizing our sales efforts
with homebuilders at our master-planned communities. However,
due to the uncertainty in the real estate market, we expect to
continue to experience a high level of volatility in our Land
Division and Other Operations segment.
Competition
The real estate development industry is highly competitive and
fragmented. We compete with third parties in our efforts to sell
land to homebuilders. We compete with other local, regional and
national real estate companies and homebuilders, often within
larger subdivisions designed, planned and developed by such
competitors. Some of our competitors have greater financial,
marketing, sales and other resources than we do.
In addition, there are relatively low barriers to entry into the
real estate market. There are no required technologies that
would preclude or inhibit competitors from entering our markets.
Our competitors may independently develop land. A substantial
portion of our operations are in Florida and South Carolina, and
we expect to continue to face additional competition from new
entrants into our markets.
Employees
As of December 31, 2008, we employed a total of 84
individuals, of which 55 were part of our Land Division and 29
were part of our Other Operations segment. Our employees are not
represented by any collective bargaining agreements and we have
never experienced a work stoppage. We believe our employee
relations are satisfactory. In January 2009, as part of our
continuing efforts to align our staffing levels with our current
operations, 14 employees were terminated in our Land
Division.
Additional
Information
Our Internet website address is
www.woodbridgeholdings.com. Our annual report on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K
and all amendments to those reports are available free of charge
through our website, as soon as reasonably practicable after
such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the
SEC. Our Internet website and the information contained in or
connected to our website are not incorporated into this joint
proxy statement/prospectus.
Our website also includes printable versions of our Corporate
Governance Guidelines, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
and the charters for each of the Audit, Compensation and
Nominating/Corporate Governance Committees of our Board of
Directors.
PROPERTIES
Our principal and executive offices are located at the Corporate
Headquarters of BankAtlantic, 2100 West Cypress Creek Road,
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309. Woodbridge utilizes space
pursuant to a sublease agreement with BFC. We own an office
building located at 2200 West Cypress Creek Road,
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309. Two floors of this office
building are currently leased to a third party and we will
continue to seek to lease to third parties, including our
affiliates, the remaining space available at this office
building. Core Communities owns its executive office building in
Port St. Lucie, Florida. We also have various
month-to-month
leases on the trailers we occupy in Tradition Hilton Head. In
addition to our properties used for offices, we additionally own
commercial space in Florida that is leased to third parties.
Because of the nature of our real estate operations, significant
amounts of property are held as inventory and property and
equipment in the ordinary course of our business.
234
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
In re:
Levitt and Sons, LLC, et al.,
No. 07-19845-BKC-RBR,
U.S. Bankruptcy Court Southern District of Florida
On November 9, 2007, the Debtors filed voluntary petitions
for relief under the Chapter 11 Cases in the Bankruptcy
Court. The Debtors commenced the Chapter 11 Cases in order
to preserve the value of their assets and to facilitate an
orderly wind-down of their businesses and disposition of their
assets in a manner intended to maximize the recoveries of all
constituents.
On November 27, 2007, the Office of the United States
Trustee (the U.S. Trustee), appointed an official
committee of unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 Cases
(the Creditors Committee). On January 22,
2008, the U.S. Trustee appointed a Joint Home Purchase
Deposit Creditors Committee of Creditors Holding Unsecured
Claims (the Deposit Holders Committee, and
together with the Creditors Committee, the
Committees) The Committees have a right to appear
and be heard in the Chapter 11 Cases.
On November 27, 2007, the Bankruptcy Court granted the
Debtors Motion for Authority to Incur Chapter 11
Administrative Expense Claim (Chapter 11 Admin.
Expense Motion) thereby authorizing the Debtors to incur a
post petition administrative expense claim in favor of
Woodbridge for Post Petition Services. While the Bankruptcy
Court approved the incurrence of the amounts as unsecured post
petition administrative expense claims, the cash payments of
such claims was subject to additional court approval. In
addition to the unsecured administrative expense claims, we had
pre-petition secured and unsecured claims against the Debtors.
The Debtors scheduled the amounts due to us in the
Chapter 11 Cases. Our unsecured pre-petition claims
scheduled by Levitt and Sons were approximately
$67.3 million and the secured pre-petition claim scheduled
by Levitt and Sons is approximately $460,000. We also filed
contingent claims with respect to any liability we may have
arising out of disputed indemnification obligations under
certain surety bonds. Lastly, we implemented an employee
severance fund in favor of certain employees of the Debtors.
Employees who received funds as part of this program as of
December 31, 2008, which totaled approximately
$3.9 million paid as of that date, have assigned their
unsecured claims to Woodbridge.
In 2008, the Debtors asserted certain claims against Woodbridge,
including an entitlement to a portion of the $29.7 million
federal tax refund which Woodbridge received as a consequence of
losses incurred at Levitt and Sons in prior periods; however,
the parties entered into the Settlement Agreement described
below.
On June 27, 2008, Woodbridge entered into a settlement
agreement (the Settlement Agreement) with the
Debtors and the Joint Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the
Joint Committee) appointed in the Chapter 11
Cases. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, among other things,
(i) Woodbridge agreed to pay to the Debtors
bankruptcy estates the sum of $12.5 million plus accrued
interest from May 22, 2008 through the date of payment,
(ii) Woodbridge agreed to waive and release substantially
all of the claims it had against the Debtors, including its
administrative expense claims through July 2008, and
(iii) the Debtors (joined by the Joint Committee) agreed to
waive and release any claims they had against Woodbridge and its
affiliates. After certain of Levitt and Sons creditors
indicated that they objected to the terms of the Settlement
Agreement and stated a desire to pursue claims against
Woodbridge, Woodbridge, the Debtors and the Joint Committee
entered into an amendment to the Settlement Agreement, pursuant
to which Woodbridge would, in lieu of the $12.5 million
payment previously agreed to, pay $8 million to the
Debtors bankruptcy estates and place $4.5 million in
a release fund to be disbursed to third party creditors in
exchange for a third party release and injunction. The amendment
also provided for an additional $300,000 payment by Woodbridge
to a deposit holders fund. The Settlement Agreement, as amended,
was subject to a number of conditions, including the approval of
the Bankruptcy Court. On February 20, 2009, the Bankruptcy
Court presiding over Levitt and Sons Chapter 11
bankruptcy case entered an order confirming a plan of
liquidation jointly proposed by Levitt and Sons and the Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors. That order also approved the
settlement pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, as amended. No
appeal or rehearing of the courts order was timely filed
by any party, and the settlement was consummated on
March 3, 2009.
235
Robert
D. Dance, individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated v. Woodbridge Holdings Corp. (formerly known as
Levitt Corp.), Alan B. Levan, and George P. Scanlon, Case No.
08-60111-Civ-Graham/OSullivan,
Southern District of Florida
On January 25, 2008, plaintiff Robert D. Dance filed a
purported class action complaint as a putative purchaser of our
securities against us and certain of our officers and directors,
asserting claims under the federal securities law and seeking
damages. This action was filed in the United States District
Court for the Southern District of Florida and is captioned
Dance v. Levitt Corp. et al.,
No. 08-CV-60111-DLG.
The securities litigation purports to be brought on behalf of
all purchasers of our securities beginning on January 31,
2007 and ending on August 14, 2007. The complaint alleges
that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of
the Exchange Act, and
Rule 10b-5
promulgated thereunder by issuing a series of false
and/or
misleading statements concerning our financial results,
prospects and condition.
Westchester
Fire Insurance Company vs. City of Brooksville Case No. 8:
CA-09-486
On February 9, 2009, the City of Brooksville, Florida filed
a complaint in the Circuit Court of the Fifth Judicial Circuit
in and for Hernando County, Florida. Woodbridge was named as one
of the defendants. The lawsuit alleged that Levitt Corporation
failed to construct certain public works projects in the City as
it was required to do under a Plat Approval granted by the City
for the Cascades at Southern Hills project. The lawsuit sought
recovery from Westchester Fire Insurance Company, which provided
surety bonds for Levitts performance of the public works.
Although Woodbridge was named as a defendant, no cause of action
was asserted against Woodbridge. The case was subsequently
voluntarily dismissed without prejudice. Separately, on
January 16, 2009, a federal declaratory action was filed by
Westchester Fire against the City of Brooksville, Florida in the
Federal District Court for the Middle District of Florida.
Woodbridge is not a party in that litigation. However, it is
anticipated that the federal court declaratory action will
resolve the dispute between all parties in its entirety. Based
on the claim made by the City on the bonds, at the suretys
request, Woodbridge posted a $4.0 million letter of credit
as security while the matter is litigated with the City.
We are party to additional various claims and lawsuits which
arise in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that
the ultimate resolution of these claims or lawsuits will have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
MARKET
FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Market
and Dividend Information
For market and dividend information with respect to
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock, see the section of
this joint proxy statement/prospectus above entitled
Comparative Stock Prices and Dividends.
236
Shareholder
Return Performance Graph
Set forth below is a graph comparing the cumulative total
returns (assuming reinvestment of dividends) for the
Class A common stock, the Dow Jones U.S. Total Home
Construction Index and the Russell 2000 Index and assumes $100
was invested on January 2, 2004.
Comparison
of Five Year Cumulative Total Return
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Symbol
|
|
|
1/2/04
|
|
|
12/31/04
|
|
|
12/31/05
|
|
|
12/31/06
|
|
|
12/31/07
|
|
|
12/31/08
|
Woodbridge Class A common stock
|
|
|
WDGH.PK
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
152.48
|
|
|
|
|
113.60
|
|
|
|
|
61.31
|
|
|
|
|
11.04
|
|
|
|
|
0.60
|
|
Dow Jones US Total Home Construction Index
|
|
|
DJUSHB
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
140.43
|
|
|
|
|
161.22
|
|
|
|
|
127.99
|
|
|
|
|
56.58
|
|
|
|
|
38.48
|
|
Russell 2000 Index
|
|
|
RTY
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
116.18
|
|
|
|
|
120.04
|
|
|
|
|
140.44
|
|
|
|
|
136.58
|
|
|
|
|
89.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holders
As of August 3, 2009, there were approximately 555 record
holders of our Class A Common Stock and
16,637,132 shares of our Class A Common Stock were
issued and outstanding. Our controlling shareholder, BFC, holds
all of the 243,807 shares of our Class B common stock
issued and outstanding.
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The following table contains information, as of
December 31, 2008, concerning our equity compensation plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities to be
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
Issued Upon Exercise of
|
|
Exercise Price of
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
Outstanding Options,
|
|
Remaining Available
|
Plan Category
|
|
Warrants or Rights
|
|
Warrants and Rights
|
|
for Future Issuance
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
318,471
|
|
|
$
|
78.89
|
|
|
|
281,529
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
318,471
|
|
|
$
|
78.89
|
|
|
|
281,529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market risk is defined as the risk of loss arising from adverse
changes in market valuations that arise from interest rate risk,
foreign currency exchange rate risk, commodity price risk and
equity price risk. We have a risk of loss associated with our
borrowings as we are subject to interest rate risk on our
long-term debt. At June 30, 2009, we had
$185.1 million in borrowings with adjustable rates tied to
the Prime Rate
and/or LIBOR
rates and $163.4 million in borrowings with fixed or
initially-fixed rates. Consequently, the impact on our variable
rate debt from changes in interest rates may affect our earnings
and cash flows but would generally not impact the fair value of
such debt except to the extent of the change in credit spreads.
With respect to fixed rate debt, changes in interest rates
generally affect the fair market value of the debt but not our
earnings or cash flow.
Assuming the variable rate debt balance of $185.1 million
outstanding at June 30, 2009 (which does not include
initially fixed-rate obligations which do not become floating
rate during 2009) was to remain constant, each one
percentage point increase in interest rates would increase the
interest incurred by us by approximately $1.9 million per
year.
We are subject to equity pricing risks associated with our
investments in Bluegreen and Office Depot. The value of these
securities will vary based on the results of operations and
financial condition of these investments, the general liquidity
of Bluegreen and Office Depot common stock and general equity
market conditions. The trading market for the shares of these
investments may not be liquid enough to permit us to sell the
common stock of these investments that we own without
significantly reducing the market price of these shares, if we
are able to sell them at all.
The table below sets forth our debt obligations, principal
payments by scheduled maturity, weighted-average interest rates
and estimated fair market value as of December 31, 2008
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value at
|
|
|
Payments Due by Year
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
Total
|
|
2008
|
|
Fixed rate debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes and mortgage payable(a)
|
|
|
723
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
99,332
|
|
|
|
102,192
|
|
|
|
28,384
|
|
Average interest rate
|
|
|
8.09
|
%
|
|
|
8.11
|
%
|
|
|
8.12
|
%
|
|
|
8.13
|
%
|
|
|
8.14
|
%
|
|
|
8.15
|
%
|
|
|
8.12
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes and mortgage payable(a)
|
|
|
2,797
|
|
|
|
8,102
|
|
|
|
187,895
|
|
|
|
25,751
|
|
|
|
707
|
|
|
|
19,217
|
|
|
|
244,469
|
|
|
|
227,145
|
|
Average interest rate
|
|
|
4.04
|
%
|
|
|
4.04
|
%
|
|
|
4.07
|
%
|
|
|
5.39
|
%
|
|
|
5.86
|
%
|
|
|
5.86
|
%
|
|
|
4.22
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt obligations
|
|
|
3,520
|
|
|
|
8,663
|
|
|
|
188,468
|
|
|
|
26,255
|
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
|
|
118,549
|
|
|
|
346,661
|
|
|
|
255,529
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Fair value calculated using current estimated borrowing rates. |
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
Pursuant to Woodbridges By-laws and the FBCA,
Woodbridges business and affairs are managed under the
direction of its board of directors. Directors are kept informed
of Woodbridges business through discussions with
management, including Woodbridges Chief Executive Officer
and other senior officers, by reviewing materials provided to
them and by participating in meetings of the board of directors
and its committees.
Determination
of Director Independence
At the meeting of Woodbridges board of directors held on
July 27, 2009, Woodbridges full board performed a
review of each directors independence. In making its
independence determinations, Woodbridges board of
directors adopted the definition of independence set
forth in the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange
and considered, among other things, transactions and
relationships between each director or any member of his
immediate family and Woodbridge and its subsidiaries and
affiliates, including those
238
reported below under Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions. Woodbridges board of directors also
examined transactions and relationships between directors or
their affiliates and members of Woodbridges senior
management or their affiliates. As permitted by the listing
standards of the New York Stock Exchange, Woodbridges
board determined that the following categories of relationships
do not constitute material relationships that impair a
directors independence: (i) serving on third party
boards of directors with other members of the board;
(ii) payments or charitable gifts by Woodbridge to entities
with which a director is an executive officer or employee where
such payments or gifts do not exceed the greater of
$1 million or 2% of such companys or charitys
consolidated gross revenues; and (iii) investments by
directors in common with each other or Woodbridge, its
affiliates or executive officers. As a result of its review of
the relationships of each of its members, and considering these
categorical standards, Woodbridges board affirmatively
determined that the following five directors, James Blosser, S.
Lawrence Kahn, III, Alan Levy, Joel Levy, and William
Nicholson, who together comprise a majority of the members of
the Woodbridges board, are independent as such
term is defined in the listing standards of the New York Stock
Exchange and applicable law.
Committees
of Woodbridges Board of Directors and Meeting
Attendance
Woodbridges board of directors has established audit,
compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees.
Woodbridges board has adopted a written charter for each
of these three committees and Corporate Governance Guidelines
that address the
make-up and
functioning of the board. The board has also adopted a Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of
Woodbridges directors, officers and employees. The
committee charters, Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics are posted in the Investor
Relations section of Woodbridges website at
www.woodbridgeholdings.com, and each is available in
print without charge to any shareholder of Woodbridge.
Woodbridges board met 17 times during 2008. Each member of
the board attended at least 75% of the meetings of the board and
committees on which he served, except for James Blosser, who
attended 13 of the 17 board meetings and one of the two
nominating and corporate governance committee meetings held
during 2008. Seven of the nine members of the board attended
Woodbridges 2008 annual meeting of shareholders, although
Woodbridge has no formal policy requiring them to do so.
Woodbridges
Audit Committee
Woodbridges audit committee consists of Joel Levy,
chairman, William Nicholson and S. Lawrence Kahn, III.
Woodbridges board has determined that all current members
of the audit committee are financially literate and
independent within the meaning of the listing
standards of the New York Stock Exchange and applicable SEC
regulations. Mr. Levy, the chairman of the committee, is
qualified as an audit committee financial expert as
such term is defined in Item 407(d)(5) of
Regulation S-K.
Woodbridges audit committee met eight times during 2008,
and its members also held various informal conference calls as a
committee. The committee is directly responsible for the
appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of
Woodbridges independent auditor. Additionally, the
committee assists board oversight of: (i) the integrity of
Woodbridges financial statements;
(ii) Woodbridges compliance with legal and regulatory
requirements; (iii) the qualifications, performance and
independence of Woodbridges independent auditor; and
(iv) the performance of Woodbridges internal audit
function. In connection with these oversight functions,
Woodbridges audit committee receives reports from
Woodbridges outsourced internal audit group, periodically
meets with management and Woodbridges independent auditor
to receive information concerning internal control over
financial reporting and any deficiencies in such control, and
has adopted a complaint monitoring procedure that enables
confidential and anonymous reporting to the committee of
concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.
A report from Woodbridges audit committee is included
below.
Woodbridges
Compensation Committee
Woodbridges compensation committee consists of S. Lawrence
Kahn, III, chairman, Alan Levy and William Nicholson. All
of the members of the committee are independent within the
meaning of the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange.
In addition, each committee member is a Non-Employee
Director as defined in
Rule 16b-3
under the Exchange Act and an outside director as
defined for purposes
239
of Section 162(m) of the Code. Woodbridges
compensation committee met 11 times during 2008. The committee
provides assistance to the board in fulfilling its
responsibilities relating to the compensation of
Woodbridges executive officers. It determines the
compensation of Woodbridges chief executive officer and,
after reviewing the compensation recommendations of
Woodbridges chief executive officer, determines the
compensation of Woodbridges other executive officers. It
also administers Woodbridges equity-based and
performance-based compensation plans.
Woodbridges
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Woodbridges nominating and corporate governance committee
consists of James Blosser, chairman, Alan Levy and Joel Levy,
each of whom has been determined by Woodbridges board of
directors to meet the New York Stock Exchanges standards
for independence. Woodbridges nominating and corporate
governance committee met two times during 2008. The committee is
responsible for assisting the board in identifying individuals
qualified to become directors, making recommendations of
candidates for directorships, developing and recommending to the
board a set of corporate governance principles for Woodbridge,
overseeing the evaluation of the board and management,
overseeing the selection, composition and evaluation of board
committees and overseeing the management continuity and
succession planning process.
Generally, the committee will identify candidates through the
business and other organization networks of the directors and
management. Candidates for director will be selected on the
basis of the contributions the committee believes that those
candidates can make to the board and to management and on such
other qualifications and factors as the committee considers
appropriate. In assessing potential new directors, the committee
will seek individuals from diverse professional backgrounds who
provide a broad range of experience and expertise. Board
candidates should have a reputation for honesty and integrity,
strength of character, mature judgment and experience in
positions with a high degree of responsibility. In addition to
reviewing a candidates background and accomplishments,
candidates for director nominees are reviewed in the context of
the current composition of Woodbridges board and the
evolving needs of the company. Woodbridge also requires that its
board members be able to dedicate the time and resources
sufficient to ensure the diligent performance of their duties on
the companys behalf, including attending board and
applicable committee meetings. If the committee believes a
candidate would be a valuable addition to the board, it will
recommend the candidates election to the full board. Since
Woodbridges last annual meeting of shareholders, the
committee has not nominated a new candidate for election as
director.
Under Woodbridges By-laws, nominations for directors may
be made only by or at the direction of Woodbridges board
of directors or by a shareholder entitled to vote who delivers
written notice (along with certain additional information
specified in Woodbridges By-laws) not less than 90 nor
more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the
preceding years annual meeting of shareholders. For
Woodbridges 2010 annual meeting of shareholders (in the
event the merger is not consummated and Woodbridges
separate corporate existence remains in effect at that time),
Woodbridge must receive this notice between May 24 and June 23,
2010.
Woodbridges
Investment Committee
Woodbridges investment committee was established by the
companys board of directors by resolution in September
2003 and consists of Alan B. Levan, chairman, John E. Abdo,
William Nicholson and two outside, non-voting advisory members.
The committee met 15 times in 2008. Woodbridges investment
committee assists the board in supervising and overseeing the
management of the companys investments in capital assets.
Specifically, the committee (i) reviews and approves all
real property transactions, (ii) authorizes new project and
working capital debt subject to guidelines established by the
board, and (iii) authorizes refinancing and other
modifications to existing project and other working capital debt
subject to limits established by the board.
240
Executive
Sessions of Non-Management and Independent
Directors
On April 28 and September 22, 2008, Woodbridges
non-management directors met in an executive session of the
board in which management directors and other members of
management did not participate. Mr. Dornbush was the
presiding director for these sessions. The non-management
directors will meet at semi-annual scheduled meetings each year
and may schedule additional meetings without management present
as they determine to be necessary.
Communications
with the Board of Directors and Non-Management
Directors
Interested parties who wish to communicate with
Woodbridges board of directors, any individual director or
the non-management directors as a group can write to
Woodbridges Secretary at Woodbridge Holdings Corporation,
2100 West Cypress Creek Road, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
33309. If the person submitting the letter is a Woodbridge
shareholder, the letter should include a statement indicating
such. Depending on the subject matter, an officer of Woodbridge
will:
|
|
|
|
|
forward the letter to the director or directors to whom it is
addressed;
|
|
|
|
attempt to handle the inquiry directly if it relates to routine
or ministerial matters, including requests for
information; or
|
|
|
|
not forward the letter if it is primarily commercial in nature
or if it is determined to relate to an improper or irrelevant
topic.
|
A member of Woodbridges management will, at each meeting
of the board, present a summary of all letters received since
the last meeting that were not forwarded to the board and will
make those letters available to the board upon request.
Code
of Ethics
Woodbridge has a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that
applies to all directors, officers and employees of the company,
including its principal executive officer, principal financial
officer and principal accounting officer. Woodbridge will post
amendments to or waivers from the Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics (to the extent applicable to Woodbridges principal
executive officer, principal financial officer or principal
accounting officer) on its website at
www.woodbridgeholdings.com. There were no such waivers
from the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics during 2008. During
April 2008, the Company made ministerial amendments to the Code
of Business Conduct and Ethics, and the amended Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics is posted on the Companys website at
www.woodbridgeholdings.com.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Woodbridges board of directors has designated Alan Levy,
S. Lawrence Kahn, III and William R. Nicholson, none of
whom are employees of Woodbridge or any of its subsidiaries, to
serve on Woodbridges compensation committee. Alan B. Levan
and John E. Abdo, Woodbridges Chairman and Vice Chairman,
respectively, are also executive officers of BFC. In addition,
Messrs. Levan and Abdo are executive officers of
BankAtlantic Bancorp and directors of Bluegreen, each of which
is an affiliate of Woodbridge. During 2008, in addition to the
compensation paid to them by Woodbridge, each of
Messrs. Levan and Abdo received compensation from BFC and
from BankAtlantic Bancorp, and each was granted stock options by
Bluegreen.
Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Based solely upon a review of the copies of the forms furnished
to Woodbridge and written representations that no other reports
were required, Woodbridge believes that, during the year ended
December 31, 2008, all filing requirements under
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act applicable to its
officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners were
complied with on a timely basis.
241
MANAGEMENT
Board
of Directors
Woodbridges board of directors currently consists of nine
directors divided into three classes, each of which has a
three-year term expiring in annual succession. Woodbridges
By-laws provide that the board of directors shall consist of no
less than three or more than twelve directors. The specific
number of directors is set from time to time by resolution of
the board.
Election
of Directors (Proposal No. 2 at Woodbridges
Annual Meeting)
A total of three directors will be elected at the Woodbridge
annual meeting, all of whom will be elected for the term
expiring at the earlier of Woodbridges 2012 annual meeting
of shareholders and the consummation of the merger described in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Each of the nominees was
recommended for nomination by Woodbridges nominating and
corporate governance committee and has consented to serve the
term indicated. If any of them should become unavailable to
serve as a director, the board may designate a substitute
nominee. In that case, the persons named as proxies will vote
for the substitute nominee designated by the board. Except as
otherwise indicated, the nominees and directors listed below
have had no change in principal occupation or employment during
the past five years.
The
Directors Standing For Election Are:
TERMS ENDING AT THE EARLIER OF THE CONSUMMATION OF THE MERGER
AND 2012:
|
|
ALAN B. LEVAN
|
Director
since 1987
|
Information with respect to the background and experience of
Mr. Levan is set forth in the section entitled
Information about BFC Management
Board of Directors.
|
|
JAMES BLOSSER
|
Director
since 2001
|
James Blosser, age 71, has been an attorney with the
law firm of Blosser & Sayfie since 2002.
Mr. Blosser is also a member of the board of directors of
Mellon United National Bank.
|
|
DARWIN
DORNBUSH
|
Director
since 2003
|
Darwin Dornbush, age 79, has been a partner in the
law firm of Dornbush Schaeffer Strongin & Venaglia,
LLP since 1964. Mr. Dornbush also serves as Secretary of
Cantel Medical Corp., a healthcare company, and he has served as
Secretary of Benihana and its predecessor since 1983. In
addition, during February 2009, Mr. Dornbush rejoined the
board of directors of Benihana, as chairman of the board, after
serving as a director of Benihana from 1995 through 2005.
WOODBRIDGES
BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT ITS SHAREHOLDERS VOTE
FOR THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES FOR
DIRECTOR.
The
Directors Continuing In Office Are:
TERMS ENDING AT THE EARLIER OF THE CONSUMMATION OF THE MERGER
AND 2010:
|
|
S. LAWRENCE
KAHN, III
|
Director
since 2003
|
S. Lawrence Kahn, III, age 62, has been the
President and Chief Executive Officer of Lowell Homes, Inc., a
Florida corporation engaged in the business of homebuilding,
since 1986. Mr. Kahn also serves as a director of the Great
Florida Bank.
|
|
JOEL LEVY
|
Director
since 2003
|
Joel Levy, age 69, is currently the Vice Chairman of
Adler Group, Inc., a commercial real estate company, and he
served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Adler Group,
Inc. from 1984 through 2000. Mr. Levy also serves as
President and Chief Executive Officer of JLRE Consulting, Inc.
242
|
|
WILLIAM
SCHERER
|
Director
since 2001
|
William Scherer, age 61, has been an attorney in the
law firm of Conrad & Scherer, LLP or its predecessors
since 1974.
TERMS ENDING AT THE EARLIER OF THE CONSUMMATION OF THE MERGER
AND 2011:
|
|
JOHN E. ABDO
|
Director
since 1985
|
Information with respect to the background and experience of
Mr. Abdo is set forth in the section entitled
Information about BFC Management
Board of Directors.
|
|
WILLIAM
NICHOLSON
|
Director
since 2003
|
William Nicholson, age 63, has been a principal with
Heritage Capital Group since 2003. Since 2004,
Mr. Nicholson has also served as President of WRN Financial
Corporation and, since 2008, he has been a principal with EXP
Loan Services LLC.
|
|
ALAN J. LEVY
|
Director
since 2005
|
Alan J. Levy, age 69, is the founder and, since
1980, has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of
Great American Farms, Inc., an agricultural company involved in
the farming, marketing and distribution of a variety of fresh
fruits and vegetables.
Executive
Officers
The following individuals are executive officers of Woodbridge:
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Position
|
|
Alan B. Levan
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
|
John E. Abdo
|
|
Vice Chairman
|
Seth M. Wise
|
|
President
|
John K. Grelle
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Officers serve at the discretion of Woodbridges board of
directors. There is no family relationship between any of the
directors or executive officers, and there is no arrangement or
understanding between any director or executive officer and any
other person pursuant to which the director or executive officer
was selected.
Seth M. Wise, age 39, was named President of
Woodbridge in July 2005 after serving as Executive Vice
President of Woodbridge since September 2003. At the request of
Woodbridge, Mr. Wise served as President of Levitt and
Sons, the former wholly-owned homebuilding subsidiary of
Woodbridge, prior to its filing for bankruptcy on
November 9, 2007. He also previously was Vice President of
Abdo Companies, Inc., a South-Florida-based private real estate
development company controlled by Mr. Abdo.
Information with respect to the background and experience of
Messrs. Levan and Abdo is set forth in the section entitled
Information about BFC Management
Board of Directors, and information with respect to the
background and experience of Mr. Grelle is set forth in the
section entitled Information about BFC
Management Executive Officers.
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Review,
Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related
Persons
Woodbridge has a policy for the review and approval of
transactions in which it was or is to be a participant, the
amount involved exceeded or will exceed $120,000 annually and
any of its directors or executive officers, or their immediate
family members, had or will have a direct or indirect material
interest. Until February 2008, this policy provided for
Woodbridges board or a designated committee thereof to
review and, if deemed desirable, approve all such related person
transactions. In reviewing related person transactions, the
board or the designated committee analyzed, among other factors
it deemed appropriate, whether such
243
related person transaction was or is to be for the benefit of
Woodbridge and upon terms no less favorable to Woodbridge than
if the related person transaction was with an unrelated party.
During February 2008, Woodbridges board delegated to the
nominating and corporate governance committee the review and
approval of related person transactions relating to directors,
executive officers and their immediate family, other than
related person transactions presenting issues regarding
accounting, internal accounting controls or audit matters, the
review and approval of which was delegated by the board to the
audit committee. In reviewing related person transactions, the
nominating and corporate governance committee or the audit
committee, as the case may be, evaluates the related party
transaction based on, among other factors it deems appropriate,
those factors described in the preceding paragraph.
During 2008, no related person transaction occurred where these
policies were not followed.
Transactions
with Related Persons
Woodbridge and BankAtlantic Bancorp are under common control.
The controlling shareholder of Woodbridge and BankAtlantic
Bancorp is BFC. BankAtlantic Bancorp is the parent company of
BankAtlantic. Shares representing a majority of BFCs total
voting power are owned or controlled by Woodbridges
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Alan B. Levan, and by
Woodbridges Vice Chairman, John E. Abdo, both of whom are
also directors of Woodbridge and executive officers and
directors of each of BFC, BankAtlantic Bancorp and BankAtlantic.
Messrs. Levan and Abdo are also the Chairman and Vice
Chairman, respectively, of Bluegreen.
Woodbridge, BFC, BankAtlantic Bancorp and Bluegreen are parties
to a shared services arrangement, pursuant to which BFC Shared
Services Corporation, a subsidiary of BFC, provides Woodbridge,
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Bluegreen with various executive and
administrative services, including human resources, risk
management and investor and public relations services. The total
amount paid for these services by Woodbridge in 2008 was
$1.1 million.
Effective May 2008, Woodbridge entered into a sublease agreement
with BFC pursuant to which BFC leases to the Company space
located at the BankAtlantic corporate office at an initial
annual rate of approximately $152,000, subject to annual 3%
increases. During 2008, Woodbridge paid BFC approximately
$101,000 under this sublease agreement.
Effective March 2008, Woodbridge entered into an agreement with
BankAtlantic pursuant to which BankAtlantic agreed to host
Woodbridges information technology servers and to provide
hosting and certain other information technology services to
Woodbridge. In accordance with this agreement, Woodbridge paid
BankAtlantic a one-time
set-up
charge of approximately $17,000 during 2008. This agreement also
provides for Woodbridge to pay BankAtlantic monthly hosting fees
of $10,000. During 2008, Woodbridge paid BankAtlantic monthly
hosting fees of approximately $73,000 as well as fees of
approximately $23,000 for other information technology services
provided to Woodbridge by BankAtlantic. Effective April 1,
2009, the monthly hosting fees increased to $15,000.
Certain of Woodbridges executive officers separately
receive compensation from affiliates of Woodbridge for services
rendered to those affiliates. Woodbridges directors and
executive officers also have banking relationships with
BankAtlantic in the ordinary course of BankAtlantics
business.
Woodbridge maintains securities sold under repurchase agreements
at BankAtlantic. At December 31, 2008, $4.4 million of
cash and cash equivalents were held on deposit by BankAtlantic
in Woodbridges accounts. Interest on deposits held at
BankAtlantic for the year ended December 31, 2008 was
approximately $72,000. Additionally, at December 31, 2008,
BankAtlantic facilitated the placement of $49.9 million of
certificates of deposits insured by the FDIC with other insured
depository institutions on Woodbridges behalf through the
CDARS program. The CDARS program facilitates the placement of
funds into certificates of deposits issued by other financial
institutions in increments of less than the standard FDIC
insurance maximum to insure that both principal and interest are
eligible for full FDIC insurance coverage.
244
Woodbridge is currently working with Bluegreen to explore
avenues for assisting Bluegreen in obtaining liquidity for its
receivables, which may include, among other potential
alternatives, Woodbridge forming a broker dealer to raise
capital through private or public offerings. Bluegreen has
agreed to reimburse Woodbridge for certain expenses, including
legal and professional fees, incurred in connection with this
effort. As of June 30, 2009, Woodbridge was reimbursed
approximately $602,000 from Bluegreen and has recorded a
receivable of approximately $481,000.
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
Overview
of Compensation Program
Woodbridges compensation committee (for purposes of this
Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Committee)
administers the compensation program for Woodbridges
executive officers. The Committee reviews and determines all
executive officer compensation, administers Woodbridges
equity incentive plans (including reviewing and approving grants
to Woodbridges executive officers), makes recommendations
to shareholders with respect to proposals related to
compensation matters and generally consults with management
regarding employee compensation programs.
The Committees charter reflects these responsibilities,
and the Committee and Woodbridges board periodically
review and, if appropriate, revise the charter.
Woodbridges board determines the Committees
membership, which is composed entirely of independent directors.
The Committee meets at regularly scheduled times during the
year, and it may also hold specially scheduled meetings and take
action by written consent. At board meetings, the Chairman of
the Committee reports on Committee actions and recommendations,
as he deems appropriate. Executive compensation is reviewed at
executive sessions of non-management and independent members of
the Board.
Compensation
Philosophy and Objectives
Historically, Woodbridges compensation program for
executive officers consisted of a base salary, cash bonuses
under an annual incentive program, periodic grants of equity
awards and health and welfare benefits. The Committee believes
that the most effective executive officer compensation program
is one that is designed to align the interests of the executive
officers with those of shareholders by compensating the
executive officers in a manner that advances both the short-and
long-term interests of Woodbridge and its shareholders. The
Committee believes that Woodbridges compensation program
for executive officers is appropriately based upon
Woodbridges performance, the performance and level of
responsibility of the executive officer and the market,
generally, with respect to executive officer compensation.
Pursuant to its authority under its charter to engage the
services of outside advisors, experts and others to assist the
Committee, during 2008, the Committee engaged the services of
Johnson Associates, Inc., a third party compensation consultant,
to meet with and advise the Committee with respect to
establishing Woodbridges 2008 compensation program for
Alan B. Levan, Woodbridges Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer, John E. Abdo, Woodbridges Vice Chairman, and Seth
M. Wise, Woodbridges President.
Messrs. Levan and Abdo hold executive positions at BFC and
BankAtlantic Bancorp and receive compensation directly from
those companies. In addition, John K. Grelle, Woodbridges
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, also
serves as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of BFC and receives compensation directly from BFC for his
services. While the Committee does not determine the
compensation paid by BFC to Messrs. Levan, Abdo and Grelle
or by BankAtlantic Bancorp to Messrs. Levan and Abdo, the
Committee considers the fact that Messrs. Levan, Abdo and
Grelle devote time to the operations of those companies when
determining the compensation Woodbridge pays to them.
Role of
Executive Officers in Compensation Decisions
The Committee makes all compensation decisions for the
Woodbridge Named Executive Officers (as defined in the
introductory paragraph to the Summary Compensation
Table below) and approves equity
245
awards to all of Woodbridges employees. The Chief
Executive Officer annually reviews the performance of each of
the Woodbridge Named Executive Officers (other than himself,
whose performance is reviewed by the Committee). The conclusions
reached and recommendations based on these reviews, including
those with respect to setting and adjusting base salaries, the
payment of cash bonuses under Woodbridges annual incentive
program and the granting of equity awards, are presented to the
Committee. The Committee can exercise its discretion in
modifying upward or downward any recommended amounts or awards
to the Woodbridge Named Executive Officers. In 2008, the
Committee accepted without modification the recommendations of
the Chief Executive Officer with respect to the base salaries
and bonuses paid or to be paid to the Woodbridge Named Executive
Officers. During 2008, Woodbridge did not grant any equity
awards to the Woodbridge Named Executive Officers.
Executive
Officer Compensation Components
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, the principal
components of compensation for the Woodbridge Named Executive
Officers were base salary and cash bonuses under
Woodbridges 2008 annual incentive program. Although no
equity awards were granted during 2008, the Woodbridge Named
Executive Officers compensation has historically also included
long-term equity incentive compensation. Beginning in 2009, the
compensation of certain of the Woodbridge Named Executive
Officers will include, in lieu of cash bonuses under the
formula-based component of Woodbridges annual incentive
program, compensation based on returns realized by Woodbridge on
its investments. See New Compensation Program for
Executives Commencing in 2009 below.
Base
Salary
The Committee believes that the base salaries offered by
Woodbridge are competitive based on a review of market practices
and the duties and responsibilities of each Woodbridge Named
Executive Officer. In setting base salaries, the Committee
periodically examines market compensation levels and trends
observed in the market for executives of comparable experience
and skills. Market information is used as an initial frame of
reference for establishing and adjusting base salaries. The
Committee believes that the Woodbridge Named Executive
Officers base salaries should be competitive with those of
other executives with comparable experience at organizations
similar to Woodbridge.
In addition to examining market compensation levels and trends,
the Committee makes base salary decisions for the Woodbridge
Named Executive Officers based on an annual review by the
Committee with input and recommendations from the Chief
Executive Officer. The Committees review includes, among
other things, the functional and decision-making
responsibilities of each position, the significance of each
Woodbridge Named Executive Officers specific area of
individual responsibility to Woodbridges financial
performance and achievement of overall goals, and the
contribution, experience and work performance of each Woodbridge
Named Executive Officer.
With respect to base salary decisions for the Chief Executive
Officer, the Committee made an assessment of
Mr. Levans performance as Chief Executive Officer and
its expectations as to his future contributions to the Company,
as well as the factors considered in determining the
compensation of the other Woodbridge Named Executive Officers,
including reviewing market compensation levels and trends and
evaluating his individual performance and the Companys
financial condition, operating results and attainment of
strategic objectives. As described above, during 2008, the
Committee engaged Johnson Associates, Inc., a third party
compensation consultant, to assist the Committee in establishing
the compensation, including base salary, to be paid
Mr. Levan (as well as to Messrs. Abdo and Wise). In
evaluating the performance of Mr. Levan for purposes of not
only his base salary, but also any cash bonus under
Woodbridges annual incentive program and stock option
awards under Woodbridges long-term equity incentive
compensation program, the Committee considered
Mr. Levans overall performance and his critical
assessment of the issues facing Woodbridge during 2008.
Based on market conditions and the impact of these market
conditions on Woodbridge in 2007, at the request of
Messrs. Levan and Abdo, their respective 2007 annual base
salaries were decreased to $1, effective
246
October 1, 2007. Effective July 28, 2008,
Messrs. Levan and Abdos respective annual base
salaries were increased to $350,000.
The 2008 annual base salary of Seth M. Wise, Woodbridges
President, remained unchanged from its 2007 level of $350,000.
The annual base salary of John K. Grelle, who was appointed
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Woodbridge on May 20, 2008, was set at $235,200 for 2008.
For 2009, the annual base salaries of Messrs. Levan, Abdo,
Wise and Grelle will remain unchanged from their respective 2008
levels.
Effective January 11, 2008, George P. Scanlon resigned as
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Woodbridge. In connection with his resignation, Woodbridge
entered into an agreement with Mr. Scanlon pursuant to
which Mr. Scanlon provided certain services to Woodbridge
through December 31, 2008, and Woodbridge paid an aggregate
of approximately $170,000 and provided certain benefits to
Mr. Scanlon during that period. Patrick M. Worsham, who
served as acting Chief Financial Officer of Woodbridge from
January 11, 2008 through May 19, 2008, received
compensation of approximately $133,000 for his services during
that period.
Annual
Incentive Program
Woodbridges annual incentive program is a cash bonus plan
designed to promote performance and achievement of corporate
strategic goals and initiatives, encourage the growth of
shareholder value and allow the Woodbridge Named Executive
Officers to participate in the growth and profitability of
Woodbridge. This program may include elements tied to the
achievement of pre-established, objective individual and
company-wide annual financial performance goals established
during Woodbridges annual budget cycle. The portion of a
Woodbridge Named Executive Officers cash bonus under the
program that is related to financial performance goals may vary
by individual and the impact that he has on the financial
performance of Woodbridge as a whole and of his respective
division. Woodbridges annual incentive program also
includes a discretionary element under which bonuses may be paid
based on a subjective evaluation of the Woodbridge Named
Executive Officers overall performance in areas outside
those that can be objectively measured from financial results.
Each Woodbridge Named Executive Officers bonus is intended
to take into account corporate and individual components, which
are weighted according to the Woodbridge Named Executive
Officers responsibilities.
The Committee established objective financial criteria for
potential bonuses to Messrs. Levan and Abdo under
Woodbridges 2008 annual incentive program tied to the
achievement of goals relating to Woodbridges consolidated
gross revenues, subject to reduction in the sole discretion of
the Committee. Messrs. Levan and Abdo were also eligible to
receive cash bonuses under the discretionary component of
Woodbridges 2008 annual incentive program. The Committee
determined that it would not be possible to establish objective
financial criteria for Mr. Wise under Woodbridges
2008 annual incentive program but determined that Mr. Wise
would be eligible for a discretionary bonus of up to 60% of his
2008 annual base salary. Mr. Grelle joined Woodbridge in
May 2008 at which point the objective financial criteria under
Woodbridges 2008 annual incentive program had already been
established. As a result, Mr. Grelle was only eligible to
receive a discretionary cash bonus under Woodbridges 2008
annual incentive program. During 2008, a total of $1,264,880 in
cash bonuses was paid to the Woodbridge Named Executive Officers
under Woodbridges 2008 annual incentive program as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Alan B. Levan
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
John E. Abdo
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
Seth M. Wise
|
|
$
|
210,000
|
|
John K. Grelle
|
|
$
|
54,880
|
|
Each of these bonuses was paid under the discretionary component
of Woodbridges 2008 annual incentive program based on a
subjective evaluation of the Woodbridge Named Executive
Officers overall performance in areas outside those that
can be objectively measured from financial results. The
discretionary bonuses paid to each of Messrs. Levan, Abdo
and Wise were approved by the Committee based on the
247
recommendation of Johnson Associates, Inc. As described above,
Mr. Scanlon resigned as Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Woodbridge, effective January 11,
2008, and Mr. Worsham served as acting Chief Financial
Officer of the Company from January 11, 2008 through
May 19, 2008. Neither of Messrs. Scanlon or Worsham
was eligible to receive a bonus under Woodbridges 2008
annual incentive program.
Beginning in 2009, Woodbridge has decided to discontinue its
annual incentive program and instead has adopted the new
compensation program discussed below under New
Compensation Program for Executives Commencing in 2009.
However, the Woodbridge Named Executive Officers will remain
eligible to receive cash bonuses payable at the discretion of
the Committee based upon a subjective evaluation of their
performance and contribution to the success and growth of
Woodbridge in areas outside those that may be objectively
measured based on specific financial goals. Decisions by the
Committee regarding discretionary cash bonuses to the Woodbridge
Named Executive Officers will generally be made based upon the
recommendation of Woodbridges Chief Executive Officer
(other than with respect to awards of discretionary cash bonuses
to Woodbridges Chief Executive Officer), the Woodbridge
Named Executive Officers position, an evaluation of the
Woodbridge Named Executive Officers performance, the
Woodbridge Named Executive Officers other compensation,
including compensation paid or to be paid under the new
compensation program discussed below, and discussions with the
Woodbridge Named Executive Officer.
Long-Term
Equity Incentive Compensation
Woodbridges long-term equity incentive compensation
program provides an opportunity for the Woodbridge Named
Executive Officers to increase their stake in Woodbridge through
grants of options to purchase shares of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock. This program encourages the
Woodbridge Named Executive Officers to focus on
Woodbridges long-term performance by aligning the
Woodbridge Named Executive Officers interests with those
of Woodbridges shareholders, since the ultimate value of
such compensation is directly dependent on the stock price. The
Committee believes that providing its executives with
opportunities to acquire an interest in the growth and
prosperity of Woodbridge through the grant of stock options
enables Woodbridge to attract and retain qualified and
experienced executive officers and offer additional long-term
incentives.
The Committees grant of stock options to the Woodbridge
Named Executive Officers is discretionary based on an assessment
of the individuals contribution to the success and growth
of Woodbridge, subject in any event to the limitations set by
the Woodbridges Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Incentive
Plan. Decisions by the Committee regarding grants of stock
options to the Woodbridge Named Executive Officers are generally
made based upon the recommendation of the Chief Executive
Officer (other than with respect to decisions by the Committee
regarding grants of stock options to the Chief Executive
Officer), the level of the Woodbridge Named Executive
Officers position, an evaluation of the Woodbridge Named
Executive Officers past and expected future performance
and the number of outstanding and previously granted stock
options to the Woodbridge Named Executive Officer. Historically,
stock options granted to the Woodbridge Named Executive Officers
have an exercise price equal to the market value of such stock
on the date of grant and vest on the fifth anniversary of the
date of grant. The Committee believes that such stock options
serve as a significant aid in the retention of the Woodbridge
Named Executive Officers, since these stock option awards do not
vest until five years after the grant date.
During 2008, Woodbridge did not grant any stock options to the
Woodbridge Named Executive Officers.
New
Compensation Program for Executives Commencing in 2009
In place of Woodbridges annual incentive program described
above, commencing in 2009, the Committee and Woodbridges
board have approved the terms of a new compensation program for
certain of Woodbridges employees, including
Messrs. Levan, Abdo and Wise (for the purposes of this
section, the Named Executive Officer Participants),
pursuant to which a portion of each Named Executive Officer
Participants compensation will be based on the cash
returns realized by Woodbridge on its investments.
Mr. Grelle is not a participant in this new compensation
program.
248
Under the terms and conditions of the new compensation program,
all of Woodbridges investments are or will be held by
individual limited partnerships or other legal entities
established for such purpose. The Named Executive Officer
Participants and other participating employees will have
interests in the entities, which will be the basis of their
incentives under the programs. The Named Executive Officer
Participants may have interests tied both to the performance of
a particular investment as well as interests relating to the
performance of the portfolio of investments as a whole.
Woodbridge, in its capacity as investor in the program, will be
entitled to receive a return of its invested capital and a
specified rate of return on its invested capital prior to the
Named Executive Officer Participants being entitled to receive
any portion of the realized profits. Once Woodbridge receives
its priority return of invested capital and the stated return as
well as certain additional amounts, the remaining proceeds will
be available for distribution among those employees directly
responsible for the relevant investments and the Named Executive
Officer Participants. The Committee will determine in advance
the allocations for each Named Executive Officer Participant
and, although the Committee may alter these allocations on a
prospective basis, the total amount payable to each Named
Executive Officer Participant cannot be changed. The program
contains provisions which, under certain circumstances, require
the Named Executive Officer Participants to return to Woodbridge
amounts previously distributed to them. These provisions, which
are often times known as clawback provisions, are
intended to reduce the risk that any Named Executive Officer
Participant or other participating employee will be distributed
amounts under the program prior to Woodbridges receipt of
at least a return of its invested capital and the stated return.
The Named Executive Officer Participants clawback
obligations relate to the performance of the portfolio of
investments as a whole even if they participate in the
performance of a particular investment. The program contemplates
that the clawback obligations will be funded solely from
holdback accounts established with respect to each Named
Executive Officer Participant and other participating employee.
A portion of the amount to which a Named Executive Officer
Participant or other participating employee would otherwise be
entitled to (which portion has initially been set at 25% but can
be increased, when appropriate, to as high as 75%) will be
deposited into holdback accounts or otherwise made available for
Woodbridges benefit. There are also general vesting and
forfeiture provisions applicable to each Named Executive Officer
Participants and other participating employees right
to receive any share of the realized profits under the program,
the terms of which may vary by individual.
The Committee and Woodbridges board approved this new
compensation program based on their belief that the program
appropriately aligns payments to the Named Executive Officer
Participants and other participating employees with the
performance of Woodbridges investments.
Internal
Revenue Code Limits on Deductibility of Compensation
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally
disallows a tax deduction to public corporations for
compensation over $1,000,000 paid for any fiscal year to the
corporations chief executive officer and four other most
highly compensated executive officers as of the end of any
fiscal year. However, the statute exempts qualifying
performance-based compensation from the deduction limit if
certain requirements are met.
Although the Committee has historically attempted to structure
performance-based compensation, including stock option grants or
performance-based restricted stock awards and annual bonuses, to
executive officers who may be subject to Section 162(m) in
a manner that satisfies the statutes requirements for full
tax deductibility for the compensation, the Committee also
recognizes the need to retain flexibility to make compensation
decisions that may not meet Section 162(m) standards when
necessary to enable Woodbridge to meet its overall objectives,
even if Woodbridge may not deduct all of the compensation. The
Committee approved the new compensation program described above
based on its belief that the program appropriately aligns
payments to the Woodbridge Named Executive Officers with the
performance of Woodbridges investments, while recognizing
that compensation paid under the new program will most likely
not satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m) for full tax
deductibility. As a result, there can be no assurance that all
or any portion of the compensation that may be paid by
Woodbridge in 2009 or any future period, including compensation
that may be paid by Woodbridge under its new compensation
program, will be deductible under Section 162(m).
249
Summary
Compensation Table
The following table sets forth certain summary information
concerning compensation which, during the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, Woodbridge paid to or
accrued on behalf of (i) its Chief Executive Officer,
(ii) each person who served as its Chief Financial Officer
during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 and
(iii) its Vice Chairman and its President, who were the
only other executive officers of Woodbridge during the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2008 (collectively, the
Woodbridge Named Executive Officers). Officers of
Woodbridge who also serve as officers or directors of affiliates
receive compensation from such affiliates for services rendered
on behalf of the affiliates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Option
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
Compensation
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus(1)
|
|
Awards
|
|
Awards(2)
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Earnings
|
|
Compensation(3)
|
|
Total
|
|
Alan B. Levan,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
151,218
|
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
401,449
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,500
|
|
|
$
|
1,054,167
|
|
Chief Executive Officer(4)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
400,400
|
|
|
|
6,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
372,409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
781,017
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
515,833
|
|
|
|
6,769
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
753,430
|
|
John E. Abdo,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
151,218
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
534,538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
307,740
|
|
|
|
1,493,496
|
|
Vice Chairman(4)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
487,988
|
|
|
|
8,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
505,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303,181
|
|
|
|
1,304,537
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
628,672
|
|
|
|
9,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
333,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291,244
|
|
|
|
1,263,071
|
|
Seth M. Wise,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
350,004
|
|
|
|
210,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,200
|
|
|
|
773,013
|
|
President(5)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
323,343
|
|
|
|
4,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,200
|
|
|
|
532,596
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
John K. Grelle,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
145,191
|
|
|
|
54,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,071
|
|
Executive Vice President and
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Chief Financial Officer(6)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Patrick M. Worsham,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
133,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,269
|
|
Former Acting Chief
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Financial Officer(7)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
George P. Scanlon,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169,726
|
|
|
|
169,726
|
|
Former Executive Vice President
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
202,750
|
|
|
|
2,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,875
|
|
|
|
418,457
|
|
and Chief Financial Officer(8)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
283,708
|
|
|
|
104,384
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,800
|
|
|
|
527,673
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amounts for 2008 represent discretionary cash bonuses paid
to or accrued on behalf of the Woodbridge Named Executive
Officers under Woodbridges 2008 annual incentive program
based on a subjective evaluation of their overall performance in
areas outside those that can be objectively measured from
financial results. Woodbridges 2008 annual incentive
program is more fully described in the Compensation
Discussion and Analysis section above. |
|
(2) |
|
All options are to purchase shares of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock. The amounts for 2008 represent the
dollar amounts recognized for financial statement reporting
purposes for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, in
accordance with FAS 123(R), without taking into account an
estimate of forfeitures related to service-based vesting of
stock option grants, including amounts from awards granted prior
to 2008. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts
are included in footnote 6 to the Woodbridges audited
consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008 included elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. In connection with Mr. Scanlons
resignation as Woodbridges Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer, effective January 11, 2008,
Mr. Scanlon forfeited all of his unvested stock options
pursuant to which he had the right to purchase an aggregate of
110,000 shares of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock. Woodbridge did not grant any stock options to the
Woodbridge Named Executive Officers during 2008. |
|
(3) |
|
The amounts for 2008 are comprised of the following. Each of
Messrs. Levan and Abdo received $1,500 as reimbursement for
insurance premiums for waiving participation in
Woodbridges medical, dental and vision plans. In addition,
the amount for Mr. Abdo includes management fees of
$306,240 paid by Woodbridge to Abdo Companies, Inc., of which
Mr. Abdo is the principal shareholder and Chief Executive
Officer. Mr. Wise received an automobile allowance in the
amount of $7,200. As described below under Potential
Payments upon Termination or Change-in Control, in
connection with his resignation as Woodbridges Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, effective
January 11, 2008, Woodbridge and Mr. Scanlon entered
into an agreement pursuant to which Woodbridge paid an aggregate
of $169,726 and |
250
|
|
|
|
|
provided certain benefits to Mr. Scanlon during 2008 in
consideration for Mr. Scanlons provision of certain
services to Woodbridge during the year. |
|
(4) |
|
During 2008, each of Messrs. Levan and Abdo received
options to acquire 50,000 shares of Bluegreens common
stock at an exercise price of $9.31 per share, which options are
scheduled to vest on May 21, 2013 and expire on
May 21, 2018. Each of Messrs. Levan and Abdo were also
granted during 2008 71,000 shares of restricted common
stock of Bluegreen and options to purchase an additional
71,000 shares of Bluegreens common stock at an
exercise price of $7.50 per share. These additional options and
restricted shares are scheduled to vest on May 21, 2013
(and the options are scheduled to expire on May 21, 2015);
however, in the event of a
change-in-control
of Bluegreen at a price of at least $12.50 per share of common
stock, a percentage (of up to 100%) of the options and
restricted shares will vest depending on both the timing of the
change-in-control
and the actual price for a share of Bluegreens common
stock in the transaction which results in the
change-in-control.
The aggregate grant date fair value of the options granted by
Bluegreen to each of Messrs. Levan and Abdo during 2008
computed in accordance with FAS 123(R) was $370,700. The
grant date fair value of the restricted stock awards granted by
Bluegreen to each of Messrs. Levan and Abdo during 2008
computed in accordance with FAS 123(R) was $495,580. |
|
(5) |
|
Mr. Wise was not a named executive officer of Woodbridge
during 2006. |
|
(6) |
|
Mr. Grelle was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Woodbridge on May 20, 2008. Prior to
that time, Mr. Grelle was not employed by Woodbridge. |
|
(7) |
|
Mr. Worsham served as acting Chief Financial Officer of
Woodbridge from January 11, 2008 through May 19, 2008.
Other than with respect to that period of time, Mr. Worsham
has not been employed by Woodbridge. |
|
(8) |
|
Mr. Scanlon resigned as Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Woodbridge, effective January 11, 2008. |
Grants
of Plan-Based Awards 2008
The following table sets forth certain information concerning
grants of awards to the Woodbridge Named Executive Officers
pursuant to Woodbridges non-equity and equity incentive
plans in the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
Awards:
|
|
Exercise or
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Possible Payouts
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of
|
|
Base Price
|
|
of Stock
|
|
|
|
|
Under Non-Equity Incentive
|
|
Shares of
|
|
Securities
|
|
of Option
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Awards(3)
|
|
Stock or
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Awards
|
|
Option
|
Name
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Threshold
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Units
|
|
Options
|
|
($ / Sh)
|
|
Awards
|
|
Alan B. Levan
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
John E. Abdo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seth M. Wise(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John K. Grelle(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patrick M. Worsham
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George P. Scanlon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During 2008, each of Messrs. Levan and Abdo was eligible to
receive a cash bonus under the formula-based component of
Woodbridges annual incentive program which related to the
achievement of financial performance goals tied to
Woodbridges consolidated gross revenues, subject to
reduction in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee. |
|
(2) |
|
No objective financial criteria were set under Woodbridges
2008 annual incentive program for Messrs. Wise and Grelle. |
|
(3) |
|
None of the Woodbridge Named Executive Officers received any
payments under the formula-based component of Woodbridges
2008 annual incentive program. However, each of
Messrs. Levan, Abdo, Wise and |
251
|
|
|
|
|
Grelle received a discretionary bonus under Woodbridges
2008 annual incentive program based on a subjective evaluation
of his overall performance in areas outside those that can be
objectively measured from financial results. These discretionary
bonuses are included in the Bonus column of the
Summary Compensation Table. Woodbridges 2008
annual incentive program is more fully described in the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis section above. |
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2008
The following table sets forth certain information regarding
equity-based awards of Woodbridge held by the Woodbridge Named
Executive Officers as of December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
Securities
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Option
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Options
|
|
Unearned
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Expiration
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
Options
|
|
Price
|
|
Date
|
|
Alan B. Levan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
100.75
|
|
|
|
1/2/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160.65
|
|
|
|
7/22/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65.30
|
|
|
|
7/24/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45.80
|
|
|
|
6/18/2017
|
|
John E. Abdo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
100.75
|
|
|
|
1/2/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160.65
|
|
|
|
7/22/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65.30
|
|
|
|
7/24/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45.80
|
|
|
|
6/18/2017
|
|
Seth M. Wise
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
(2)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
100.75
|
|
|
|
1/2/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160.65
|
|
|
|
7/22/2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65.30
|
|
|
|
7/24/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45.80
|
|
|
|
6/18/2017
|
|
John K. Grelle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patrick M. Worsham
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George P. Scanlon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All options are to purchase shares of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock. |
|
(2) |
|
These options vested on January 2, 2009, but they are
included as unexercisable options because they were not
exercisable as of December 31, 2008. As a result of their
vesting on January 2, 2009, these options are currently
exercisable. |
|
(3) |
|
Vests on July 22, 2010. |
|
(4) |
|
Vests on July 24, 2011. |
|
(5) |
|
Vests on June 18, 2012. |
Option
Exercises and Stock Vested 2008
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, none of the
Woodbridge Named Executive Officers exercised options to
purchase shares of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock
or Class B Common Stock. In addition, none of the
Woodbridge Named Executive Officers held any restricted shares
of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock or Class B
Common Stock which vested during the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008.
252
Potential
Payments upon Termination or
Change-in-Control
Effective January 11, 2008, Mr. Scanlon resigned as
Woodbridges Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer. In connection with his resignation, Woodbridge entered
into an agreement with Mr. Scanlon pursuant to which
Mr. Scanlon provided certain services to Woodbridge through
December 31, 2008 and, in consideration for his provision
of such services, Woodbridge paid an aggregate of approximately
$170,000 and provided certain benefits to Mr. Scanlon
during that period.
DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION
Woodbridges compensation committee recommends director
compensation to Woodbridges board based on factors it
considers appropriate and based on the recommendations of
management. Currently, each non-employee director receives
$100,000 per year for his service on Woodbridges board,
payable in cash, restricted stock or non-qualified stock
options, in such combinations as the director may elect,
provided that no more than $50,000 may be paid in cash. The
restricted stock and stock options are granted in
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock under
Woodbridges Amended and Restated 2003 Stock Incentive
Plan. Restricted stock vests monthly over a
12-month
service period beginning on July 1 of each year and stock
options are fully vested on the date of grant, have a ten-year
term and have an exercise price equal to the closing market
price of a share of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock
on the date of grant. The number of stock options and restricted
stock granted is determined by Woodbridge based on assumptions
and formulas typically used to value these types of securities.
In addition to compensation paid to directors for their service
on the board generally, Woodbridge also provides compensation to
directors for their service on the boards committees.
Currently, this compensation is comprised of the following. Each
member of the audit committee, other than its Chairman, receives
an annual fee of $10,000 for his service on that committee. The
Chairman of the audit committee receives an annual fee of
$15,000 for his service as Chairman. The Chairman of the
compensation committee and the Chairman of the nominating and
corporate governance committee each receive an annual fee of
$3,500 for their service as Chairmen. Other than the Chairmen,
members of the compensation committee and the nominating and
corporate governance committee do not receive additional
compensation for their service on those committees. Each
non-management director who serves on the investment committee
receives an annual fee of $15,000. Directors who are also
officers of Woodbridge do not receive additional compensation
for their service as directors or for attendance at board or
committee meetings.
Director
Compensation 2008
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
compensation paid to Woodbridges non-employee directors
for their service during the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Pension
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonqualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned or
|
|
Stock
|
|
Option
|
|
Incentive Plan
|
|
Compensation
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Paid in Cash
|
|
Awards(1)(3)
|
|
Awards(2)(3)
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Earnings
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Total
|
|
James Blosser
|
|
$
|
53,500
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
50,817
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
104,317
|
|
Darwin Dornbush
|
|
|
49,708
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,708
|
|
S. Lawrence Kahn, III
|
|
|
63,500
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
15,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,746
|
|
Alan J. Levy
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Joel Levy
|
|
|
65,004
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,414
|
|
William R. Nicholson
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,817
|
|
William Scherer
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All restricted stock are shares of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock. The amount represents the dollar
amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, in accordance with
FAS 123(R), without taking into account an estimate of
forfeitures related to service-based vesting, of restricted
stock grants, including amounts from awards granted prior to
2008. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are
included in footnote 6 to Woodbridges audited |
253
|
|
|
|
|
financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008 included elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. There were no forfeitures during 2008. The
grant date fair value of the restricted stock awards granted in
2008 computed in accordance with FAS 123(R) was $50,000 for
each of Messrs. Dornbush, Alan J. Levy and Scherer, $35,000
for Mr. Kahn and $25,000 for Mr. Joel Levy. |
|
(2) |
|
All options are to purchase shares of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock. The amount represents the dollar
amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, in accordance with
FAS 123(R), without taking into account an estimate of
forfeitures related to service-based vesting, of stock option
grants, including amounts from awards granted prior to 2008.
Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are
included in footnote 6 to Woodbridges audited financial
statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
included elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
There were no forfeitures during 2008. The grant date fair value
of the stock option awards computed in accordance with
FAS 123(R) was $50,817 for each of Messrs. Blosser and
Nicholson, $15,246 for Mr. Kahn and $25,410 for
Mr. Joel Levy. |
|
(3) |
|
The table below sets forth the aggregate number of shares of
restricted stock and the aggregate number of stock options held
by each non-employee director as of December 31, 2008. All
restricted stock awards are in shares of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock, and all stock options are options to
purchase shares of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Restricted Stock
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
James Blosser
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,176
|
|
Darwin Dornbush
|
|
|
3,732
|
|
|
|
4,286
|
|
S. Lawrence Kahn, III
|
|
|
2,612
|
|
|
|
7,827
|
|
Alan J. Levy
|
|
|
3,732
|
|
|
|
2,762
|
|
Joel Levy
|
|
|
1,866
|
|
|
|
11,435
|
|
William Nicholson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,834
|
|
William Scherer
|
|
|
3,732
|
|
|
|
5,497
|
|
AUDIT
COMMITTEE REPORT
The following report of Woodbridges audit committee
does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed
filed or incorporated by reference into any other Woodbridge
filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to
the extent Woodbridge specifically incorporates this report by
reference therein.
Woodbridges audit committee held eight meetings during
2008. These meetings were designed, among other things, to
facilitate and encourage communication among the audit committee
and Woodbridges management, internal auditors and
independent auditors for 2008, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
(PwC), and to monitor compliance matters.
Woodbridges audit committee discussed with
Woodbridges internal auditors and PwC the overall scope
and plans for their respective audits and met with the internal
auditors and PwC, with and without management present, to
discuss the results of their examinations and their evaluations
of the Companys internal controls. Woodbridges audit
committee has selected PwC as Woodbridges independent
auditors for 2009.
Woodbridges audit committee reviewed and discussed
Woodbridges audited consolidated financial statements for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 with
Woodbridges management and internal auditors and PwC.
Management has primary responsibility for Woodbridges
financial statements and the overall reporting process,
including Woodbridges system of internal controls. PwC
audits the annual financial statements prepared by management,
expresses an opinion as to whether those financial statements
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position, results of operations and cash flows of Woodbridge in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America and discusses with Woodbridges
audit committee their independence and any other matters that
they are required to discuss with Woodbridges audit
committee or that they believe should be raised with it.
Woodbridges audit committee oversees these
254
processes, although it must rely on information provided to it
and on the representations made by management and PwC.
Woodbridges audit committee discussed with PwC the matters
required to be discussed with audit committees under generally
accepted auditing standards, including, among other things,
matters related to the conduct of the audit of Woodbridges
consolidated financial statements and the matters required to be
discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as
amended (AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol. 1, AU
Section 380), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board in Rule 3200T.
Woodbridges audit committee also received from PwC the
written disclosures and the letter required by applicable
requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
regarding PwCs communications with Woodbridges audit
committee concerning independence, and Woodbridges audit
committee discussed with PwC its independence from Woodbridge.
When considering PwCs independence, Woodbridges
audit committee generally considers whether PwCs provision
of services to Woodbridge beyond those rendered in connection
with its audit and review of Woodbridges consolidated
financial statements, if any, was compatible with maintaining
PwCs independence. Woodbridges audit committee also
reviewed, among other things, the amount of fees paid to PwC for
audit and non-audit services.
Based on these reviews, meetings, discussions and reports,
Woodbridges audit committee recommended to
Woodbridges board that Woodbridges audited
consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008 be included in Woodbridges Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Submitted
by the Members of Woodbridges Audit Committee:
Joel Levy, Chairman
S. Lawrence Kahn, III
William R. Nicholson
FEES TO
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL 2008
AND 2007
The following table presents fees for professional services
rendered by PwC for the audit of Woodbridges annual
consolidated financial statements for fiscal 2008 and 2007 and
fees billed for audit-related services, tax services and all
other services rendered by PwC for fiscal 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2008
|
|
Fiscal 2007
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Audit fees(1)
|
|
$
|
715
|
|
|
$
|
1,197
|
|
Audit-related fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes fees for services related to Woodbridges annual
financial statement audits, the 2008 and 2007 audits of the
effectiveness of Woodbridges internal control over
financial reporting and the review of quarterly financial
statements filed in Woodbridges Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q.
The fiscal 2007 amount also includes fees relating to services
performed by PwC with respect to Woodbridges 2007 rights
offering, the amendments to Woodbridges Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A
for the year ended December 31, 2006 and Quarterly Report
on Form
10-Q/A for
the quarter ended March 31, 2007 and the November 9,
2007 bankruptcy filing of Levitt and Sons and substantially all
of its subsidiaries. |
Under its charter, Woodbridges audit committee must review
and pre-approve both audit and permitted non-audit services
provided by the independent registered public accounting firm
and shall not engage the independent registered public
accounting firm to perform any non-audit services prohibited by
law or regulation. Additionally, Woodbridges audit
committee must determine whether the independent registered
public accounting firms provision of services other than
audit services, if any, is compatible with maintaining that
firms independence. Each year, the independent registered
public accounting firms retention to audit
255
Woodbridges financial statements, including the associated
fee, is approved by Woodbridges audit committee. Under its
current practices, Woodbridges audit committee does not
regularly evaluate potential engagements of the independent
registered public accounting firm and approve or reject such
potential engagements. At each of its meetings,
Woodbridges audit committee receives updates on the
services actually provided by the independent registered public
accounting firm, and management may present additional services
for pre-approval. Woodbridges audit committee may delegate
to the Chairman of the committee the authority to evaluate and
approve engagements on behalf of the committee in the event that
a need arises for pre-approval between regular meetings. If the
Chairman so approves any such engagements, he will report that
approval to the full committee at the next meeting.
Woodbridges audit committee has determined that the
provision of the services described above is compatible with
maintaining the independent registered public accounting
firms independence.
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
Principal
Shareholders
The following table sets forth, as of August 3, 2009,
certain information as to Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock and Class B Common Stock beneficially owned by
persons owning in excess of 5% of the outstanding shares of such
stock. Management knows of no person, except as listed below,
who beneficially owned more than 5% of the outstanding shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock or Class B
Common Stock as of August 3, 2009. Except as otherwise
indicated, the information provided in the following table was
obtained from filings with the SEC and with Woodbridge pursuant
to the Exchange Act. Addresses provided are those listed in the
filings as the address of the person authorized to receive
notices and communications. For purposes of the table below and
the table set forth under Security Ownership of
Management, in accordance with
Rule 13d-3
under the Exchange Act, a person is deemed to be the beneficial
owner of any shares of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock or Class B Common Stock (1) over which he, she
or it has or shares, directly or indirectly, voting or
investment power, or (2) of which he, she or it has the
right to acquire beneficial ownership at any time within
60 days after August 3, 2009. As used herein,
voting power is the power to vote, or direct the
voting of, shares and investment power includes the
power to dispose, or direct the disposition of, such shares.
Unless otherwise noted, each beneficial owner has sole voting
and sole investment power over the shares beneficially owned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nature of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
|
Title of Class
|
|
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Percent of Class
|
|
Class A Common Stock
|
|
BFC Financial Corporation
2100 West Cypress Creek Road
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309
|
|
|
3,735,391
|
(1)
|
|
|
23.6
|
%(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pennant Capital Management, LLC
40 Main Street
Chatham, NY 07928
|
|
|
3,577,952
|
(2)
|
|
|
21.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class B Common Stock
|
|
BFC Financial Corporation
2100 West Cypress Creek Road
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309
|
|
|
243,807
|
(1)
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Woodbridges Class B Common Stock is convertible on a
share-for-share
basis into Woodbridges Class A Common Stock at any
time at BFCs discretion. The 243,807 shares of
Woodbridges Class B Common Stock held by BFC are not
separately included in the Class A Common Stock ownership
amount for BFC, but are included for the purposes of calculating
the percent of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock
beneficially owned by BFC. BFC may be deemed to be controlled by
Alan B. Levan and John E. Abdo, who collectively may be deemed
to have an aggregate beneficial ownership of shares of
BFCs Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock
representing 74.2% of the total voting power of BFC.
Mr. Levan |
256
|
|
|
|
|
serves as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Woodbridge and
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of BFC.
Mr. Abdo serves as Vice Chairman of each of Woodbridge and
BFC. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Pennant Capital Management, LLC and Alan Fournier have shared
voting and shared dispositive power over all shares listed. |
Security
Ownership of Management
Listed in the table below are the outstanding shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock and Class B
Common Stock beneficially owned as of August 3, 2009 by
(i) each Woodbridge Named Executive Officer, (ii) each
of Woodbridges directors as of such date and
(iii) Woodbridges directors and executive officers as
of such date as a group. Unless otherwise noted, the address of
all parties listed below is 2100 West Cypress Creek Road,
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
Class B
|
|
Percent of
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Class A
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
BFC Financial Corporation(1)
|
|
|
3,735,391
|
|
|
|
243,807
|
|
|
|
23.6
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Alan B. Levan(1)(2)(3)(4)
|
|
|
3,767,215
|
|
|
|
243,807
|
|
|
|
23.8
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
John E. Abdo(1)(2)(3)(4)
|
|
|
3,761,316
|
|
|
|
243,807
|
|
|
|
23.7
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
Seth M. Wise(3)(4)
|
|
|
7,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
John K. Grelle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patrick M. Worsham(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
George P. Scanlon(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James J. Blosser(4)
|
|
|
19,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Darwin C. Dornbush(4)
|
|
|
14,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Lawrence Kahn, III(4)
|
|
|
15,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alan Levy(4)
|
|
|
14,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joel Levy(4)
|
|
|
17,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
William R. Nicholson(4)
|
|
|
28,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
William R. Scherer(4)(6)
|
|
|
43,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
All directors and executive officers of Woodbridge as of
August 3, 2009 as a group (11 persons)(1)(7)
|
|
|
3,954,348
|
|
|
|
243,807
|
|
|
|
24.8
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than one percent of class. |
|
(1) |
|
Woodbridges Class B Common Stock is convertible on a
share-for-share
basis into Woodbridges Class A Common Stock at any
time at BFCs discretion. BFC may be deemed to be
controlled by Messrs. Levan and Abdo, who collectively may
be deemed to have an aggregate beneficial ownership of shares of
BFCs Class A Common Stock and Class B Common
Stock representing 74.2% of the total voting power of BFC.
Mr. Levan serves as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Woodbridge and Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
of BFC. Mr. Abdo serves as Vice Chairman of each of
Woodbridge and BFC. The 243,807 shares of Woodbridges
Class B Common Stock held by BFC are not separately
included in the Class A Common Stock Ownership
of BFC, Messrs. Levan and Abdo or Woodbridges
directors and executive officers as a group, but are included
for the purposes of calculating the percent of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock beneficially owned by each of BFC,
Messrs. Levan and Abdo and Woodbridges directors and
executive officers as a group. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes, for each of Messrs. Levan and Abdo, the
3,735,391 shares of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock and 243,807 shares of Woodbridges Class B
Common Stock owned by BFC. The Class A Common Stock ownership of
Messrs. Levan and Abdo also includes their indirect
ownership of 18 shares and 6,104 shares, respectively. |
257
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Includes beneficial ownership of shares of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock held in the BankAtlantic Security Plus
Plan as a result of BankAtlantic Bancorps previous
ownership of Woodbridge prior to the 2003 spin-off of Woodbridge
as follows: Mr. Levan 2,998 shares;
Mr. Abdo 1,821 shares; and
Mr. Wise 18 shares. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes beneficial ownership of the following shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock which may be
acquired within 60 days pursuant to stock options:
Mr. Levan 12,000 shares;
Mr. Abdo 18,000 shares;
Mr. Wise 6,000 shares;
Mr. Dornbush 4,286 shares; Mr. Alan
J. Levy 2,762 shares; Mr. Joel
Levy 11,435 shares;
Mr. Blosser 19,176 shares;
Mr. Nicholson 18,834 shares;
Mr. Scherer 5,497 shares; and
Mr. Kahn 7,827 shares. |
|
(5) |
|
As described elsewhere throughout this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, Mr. Scanlon resigned as Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Woodbridge,
effective January 11, 2008, and Mr. Worsham served as
acting Chief Financial Officer and acting Chief Accounting
Officer of Woodbridge from January 11, 2008 through
May 20, 2008. Accordingly, neither of Messrs. Scanlon
or Worsham is currently an executive officer of Woodbridge;
however, they are included in the table above because they were
both Woodbridge Named Executive Officers for 2008. Based on
information in its possession, Woodbridge believes that
Mr. Scanlons current address is
c/o Fidelity
National Information Services, 601 Riverside Avenue,
Jacksonville, Florida 32204 and that Mr. Worshams
current address is
c/o Tatum
LLC, 201 East Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 950, Tampa, Florida
33602. |
|
(6) |
|
Includes 74 shares of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock held indirectly though Mr. Scherers IRA account
and 56 shares of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock held indirectly through his wifes IRA account. |
|
|
|
(7) |
|
Includes beneficial ownership of an aggregate of
105,817 shares of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock which may be acquired by Woodbridges directors and
executive officers as of August 3, 2009 within 60 days
pursuant to the exercise of outstanding stock options. |
258
WOODBRIDGES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The information contained within this Woodbridges
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations section has been excerpted from
Woodbridges Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the SEC on
March 19, 2009, and Woodridges Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, filed with the SEC on
August 10, 2009. Unless the context otherwise requires,
references to we, us, our,
the Company and Woodbridge within this
Information About Woodbridge section refer to
Woodbridge Holdings Corporation and its consolidated
subsidiaries.
The objective of the following discussion is to provide an
understanding of the financial condition and results of
operations of Woodbridge and its wholly-owned subsidiaries as of
and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008 and for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and
2006. We currently engage in business activities through our
Land Division, consisting of the operations of Core Communities,
which develops master-planned communities, and through our Other
Operations segment (Other Operations). Other
Operations includes the parent company operations of Woodbridge
(the Parent Company), the consolidated operations of
Pizza Fusion, the consolidated operations of Carolina Oak Homes,
LLC (Carolina Oak), which engaged in homebuilding
activities in South Carolina prior to the suspension of those
activities in the fourth quarter of 2008, and the activities of
Cypress Creek Capital Holdings, LLC (Cypress Creek
Capital) and Snapper Creek Equity Management, LLC
(Snapper Creek). Also included in the Other
Operations segment are our equity investment in Bluegreen and an
investment in Office Depot.
Some of the statements contained or incorporated by reference
herein include forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of
the Exchange Act that involve substantial risks and
uncertainties. Some of the forward-looking statements can be
identified by the use of words such as anticipate,
believe, estimate, may,
intend, expect, will,
should, seek or other similar
expressions. Forward-looking statements are based largely on
managements expectations and involve inherent risks and
uncertainties. You should refer to the risks and uncertainties
discussed throughout this document, including within the
Risk Factors section, for specific risks which could
cause actual results to be significantly different from those
expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements. Some
factors which may affect the accuracy of the forward-looking
statements apply generally to the real estate industry and other
industries in which the companies we hold investments in
operate, while other factors apply directly to us. Any number of
important factors could cause actual results to differ
materially from those in the forward-looking statements
including:
|
|
|
|
|
the impact of economic, competitive and other factors affecting
the Company and its operations;
|
|
|
|
the market for real estate in the areas where the Company has
developments, including the impact of market conditions on the
Companys margins and the fair value of its real estate
inventory;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the risk that the value of the property held by Core Communities
and Carolina Oak may decline, including as a result of the
current downturn in the residential and commercial real estate
and homebuilding industries, and the potential for related
write-downs or impairment charges;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the impact of the factors negatively impacting the homebuilding
and residential real estate industries on the market and values
of commercial property;
|
|
|
|
the risk that the downturn in the credit markets may adversely
affect Cores commercial leasing projects, including the
ability of current and potential tenants to secure financing
which may, in turn, negatively impact long-term rental and
occupancy;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the risks relating to Cores dependence on certain key
tenants in its commercial leasing projects, including the risk
that current adverse conditions in the economy in general
and/or
adverse developments in the businesses of these tenants could
have a negative impact on Cores financial condition;
|
259
|
|
|
|
|
the risk that the development of parcels and master-planned
communities will not be completed as anticipated or that Core
will be obligated to make additional payments under its
outstanding development bonds;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the effects of increases in interest rates on us and the
availability and cost of credit to buyers of our inventory;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the impact of the problems in financial and credit markets on
the ability of buyers of our inventory to obtain financing on
acceptable terms, if at all, and the risk that we will be unable
to obtain financing and to renew existing credit facilities on
acceptable terms, if at all;
|
|
|
|
the risks relating to Cores liquidity, cash position and
ability to satisfy required payments under its debt facilities,
including the risk that Woodbridge may not provide funding to
Core;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the risk that Core may be required to make accelerated principal
payments on its debt obligations due to re-margining or
curtailment payment requirements, which may negatively impact
our financial condition and results of operations;
|
|
|
|
|
|
risks associated with the securities owned by the Company,
including the risk that the Company may record further
impairment charges with respect to such securities in the event
trading prices decline in the future;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the risks associated with the businesses in which the Company
holds investments;
|
|
|
|
risks associated with the Companys business strategy,
including the Companys ability to successfully make
investments notwithstanding adverse conditions in the economy
and the credit markets;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Companys success in pursuing alternatives that could
enhance liquidity for Bluegreen or be profitable for the Company;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the impact on the price and liquidity of the Companys
Class A Common Stock and on the Companys ability to
obtain additional capital in the event the Company chooses to
de-register its securities; and
|
|
|
|
the Companys success at managing the risks involved in the
foregoing.
|
Many of these factors are beyond our control. The Company
cautions that the foregoing factors are not exclusive.
Executive
Overview
We continue to focus on managing our real estate holdings during
this challenging period for the real estate industry, and on
efforts to bring costs in line with our strategic objectives. We
have taken steps to align our staffing levels and compensation
with these objectives. Our goal is to pursue acquisitions and
investments in diverse industries, including investments in
affiliates, using a combination of our cash and stock and third
party equity and debt financing. This business strategy may
result in acquisitions and investments both within and outside
of the real estate industry. We also intend to explore a variety
of funding structures which might leverage or capitalize on our
available cash and other assets currently owned by us. We may
acquire entire businesses, or majority or minority,
non-controlling interests in companies. Under this business
model, we likely will not generate a consistent earnings stream
and the composition of our revenues may vary widely due to
factors inherent in a particular investment, including the
maturity and cyclical nature of, and market conditions relating
to, the business invested in. We expect that net investment
gains and other income will depend on the success of our
investments as well as overall market conditions. We also intend
to pursue strategic initiatives with the goal of enhancing
liquidity. These initiatives may include pursuing alternatives
to monetize a portion of our interests in certain of Cores
assets through sale, possible joint ventures or other strategic
relationships, including possible public or private offerings of
debt or equity securities at Core.
As part of our strategy to access alternative financing sources
and to pursue opportunities within the capital markets, we have
taken steps to form various subsidiaries, including a broker
dealer. We envision that these subsidiaries will generate fee
income from private or public offerings that will be marketed to
investors
260
through broker dealer networks. Amongst the possible investment
opportunities is a program that we are currently exploring with
Bluegreen in which the funds raised would be invested in its
timeshare receivables. While the formation of this program is in
the early stages, the expectation is that a newly formed entity
would acquire Bluegreen receivables and issue securities in a
public offering. Bluegreen has agreed to reimburse us for
certain expenses, including legal and professional fees,
incurred by us in connection with this effort. There is,
however, no assurance that we will be successful in the venture
or that the business will be profitable for us.
Our operations have historically been concentrated in the real
estate industry which is cyclical in nature. Our largest
subsidiary is Core Communities, a developer of master-planned
communities, which sells land to residential builders as well as
to commercial developers, and internally develops, constructs
and leases income producing commercial real estate. In addition,
our Other Operations segment includes an equity investment in
Bluegreen, a NYSE-listed company, which represents approximately
31% of Bluegreens outstanding common stock, and a cost
method investment in Office Depot, a NYSE-listed company in
which we own less than 1% of the outstanding common stock.
Bluegreen is engaged in the acquisition, development, marketing
and sale of ownership interests in primarily
drive-to vacation resorts, and the development and
sale of golf communities and residential land. As described
above, we are currently working with Bluegreen Corporation to
explore avenues for assisting Bluegreen in obtaining liquidity
for its receivables, which may include, among other potential
alternatives, Woodbridge forming a broker dealer to raise
capital through private or public offerings. Our Other
Operations segment also includes the operations of Pizza Fusion,
which is a restaurant franchise operating within the quick
service and organic food industries, and the activities of
Carolina Oak, which engaged in homebuilding activities at
Tradition Hilton Head prior to the suspension of those
activities in the fourth quarter of 2008.
Financial
and Non-Financial Metrics
We evaluate our performance and prospects using a variety of
financial and non-financial metrics. The key financial metrics
utilized to evaluate historical operating performance include
revenues from sales of real estate, margin (which we measure as
revenues from sales of real estate minus cost of sales of real
estate), margin percentage (which we measure as margin divided
by revenues from sales of real estate), income before taxes, net
income and return on equity. We also continue to evaluate and
monitor selling, general and administrative expenses as a
percentage of revenue. In evaluating our future prospects,
management considers non-financial information such as acres in
backlog (which we measure as land subject to an executed sales
contract) and the aggregate value of those contracts.
Additionally, we monitor the number of properties remaining in
inventory and under contract to be purchased relative to our
sales and development trends. Our ratio of debt to
shareholders equity and cash requirements are also
considered when evaluating our future prospects, as are general
economic factors and interest rate trends. Each of the above
metrics is discussed in the following sections as it relates to
our operating results, financial position and liquidity. These
metrics are not an exhaustive list, and management may from time
to time utilize different financial and non-financial
information or may not use all of the metrics mentioned above.
Going forward, under the terms and conditions of the new
executive compensation program, all of the Companys
investments are or will be held by individual limited
partnerships or other legal entities established for such
purpose. The executive officer participants may have interests
tied both to the performance of a particular investment as well
as interests relating to the performance of the portfolio of
investments as a whole. The Company will evaluate these
investments based on certain performance criteria and other
financial metrics established by the Company in its capacity as
investor in the program.
Land
Division Overview
Core Communities develops master-planned communities and is
currently developing Tradition, Florida, which is located in
Port St. Lucie, Florida, and Tradition Hilton Head, which is
located in Hardeeville, South Carolina. Tradition, Florida
encompasses approximately 8,200 total acres. Core has sold
approximately 1,800 acres to date and has approximately
3,800 net saleable acres remaining in inventory. As of
June 30, 2009, approximately 8 acres were subject to a
sales contract with a sales price which could range from
261
$3.0 million to $3.9 million at a cost of
approximately $2.2 million. The sale is contingent upon the
purchaser obtaining financing and, if consummated on the
contemplated terms, would not result in a loss. Tradition Hilton
Head encompasses approximately 5,400 total acres, of which
175 acres have been sold to date. Approximately
2,800 net saleable acres are remaining at Tradition Hilton
Head. No acres were subject to sales contracts as of
June 30, 2009. Acres sold to date in Tradition Hilton Head
include the intercompany sale of 150 acres to Carolina Oak.
We plan to continue to focus on our Land Divisions
commercial operations through sales to developers and the
internal development of certain projects for leasing to third
parties. Core is currently pursuing the sale of two of its
commercial leasing projects. Conditions in the commercial real
estate market have deteriorated and financing is not as readily
available in the current market, which may adversely impact both
Cores ability to complete sales and the profitability of
any sales.
In addition, the overall slowdown in the real estate markets and
disruptions in credit markets continue to have a negative effect
on demand for residential land in our Land Division which
historically was partially mitigated by increased commercial
leasing revenue. Traffic at both the Tradition, Florida and
Tradition Hilton Head information centers remains slow,
reflecting the overall state of the real estate market.
Other
Operations Overview
Other Operations consist of the operations of our Parent
Company, Carolina Oak, and Pizza Fusion, activities through
Cypress Creek Capital and Snapper Creek, our equity investment
in Bluegreen and an investment in Office Depot.
During 2008, we began evaluating our investment in Bluegreen on
a quarterly basis for
other-than-temporary
impairments in accordance with FASB Staff Position
(FSP)
FAS 115-1/FAS 124-1,
The Meaning of
Other-than-Temporary
Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments
(FSP
FAS 115-1/FAS 124-1),
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 18, The
Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common
Stock, and Securities and Exchange (SEC)
Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 59. These
evaluations generally include an analysis of various
quantitative and qualitative factors relating to the performance
of Bluegreen and its stock price. We value Bluegreens
common stock using a market approach valuation technique and
Level 1 valuation inputs under SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS No. 157). Based on the results of
our evaluations during the quarters ended September 30,
2008, December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009, we
determined that
other-than-temporary
impairments were necessary for those periods. As a result, we
recorded impairment charges of $53.6 million,
$40.8 million and $20.4 million during the quarters
ended September 30, 2008, December 31, 2008 and
March 31, 2009, respectively. Based on our impairment
evaluation performed during the quarter ended June 30,
2009, we determined that our investment in Bluegreen was not
impaired at June 30, 2009. As of June 30, 2009, the
carrying value of our investment in Bluegreen was
$28.6 million.
During the quarters ended December 31 2008, March 31, 2009
and June 30, 2009, we performed impairment analyses of our
investment in Office Depot. The impairment analyses included an
evaluation of, among other things, qualitative and quantitative
factors relating to the performance of Office Depot and its
stock price. As a result of these evaluations, we determined
that
other-than-temporary
impairment charges were required at December 31, 2008 and
March 31, 2009 and recorded a $12.0 million impairment
charge relating to our investment in Office Depot in the three
months ended December 31, 2008 and an additional
$2.4 million impairment charge in the three months ended
March 31, 2009. Based on our impairment evaluation
performed during the quarter ended June 30, 2009, we
determined that its investment in Office Depot was not impaired
at June 30, 2009. As of June 30, 2009, the carrying
value of our investment in Office Depot was $6.5 million.
On August 6, 2009, the closing price of Office Depots
common stock was $5.06 per share.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management views critical accounting policies as accounting
policies that are important to the understanding of our
financial statements and also involve estimates and judgments
about inherently uncertain
262
matters. In preparing financial statements, management is
required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the
consolidated statements of financial condition and assumptions
that affect the recognition of revenues and expenses on the
consolidated statements of operations for the periods presented.
These estimates require the exercise of judgment, as future
events cannot be determined with certainty. Material estimates
that are particularly susceptible to significant change in
subsequent periods relate to revenue and cost recognition on
percent complete projects, reserves and accruals, impairment
reserves of assets, valuation of real estate, estimated costs to
complete construction, reserves for litigation and contingencies
and deferred tax valuation allowances. We base our estimates on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that are
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results
of which form the basis of making judgments about the carrying
value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent
from other sources. Actual results could differ significantly
from these estimates if conditions change or if certain key
assumptions used in making these estimates ultimately prove to
be materially incorrect.
We have identified the following accounting policies that
management views as critical to the accurate portrayal of our
financial condition and results of operations.
Loss
in excess of investment in Levitt and Sons
Under ARB No. 51, consolidation of a majority-owned
subsidiary is precluded where control does not rest with the
majority owners. Under these rules, legal reorganization or
bankruptcy represents conditions which can preclude
consolidation or equity method accounting as control rests with
the Bankruptcy Court, rather than the majority owner. As
described elsewhere in this document, Levitt and Sons, our
wholly-owned subsidiary, filed a petition for bankruptcy on
November 9, 2007. Accordingly, we deconsolidated Levitt and
Sons as of November 9, 2007, eliminating all future
operations from our financial results of operations. In
accordance with ARB No. 51, we followed the cost method of
accounting to record our interest in Levitt and Sons. As
discussed throughout this document, on February 20, 2009,
the Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming a plan of
liquidation jointly proposed by Levitt and Sons and the Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors. That order also approved the
settlement pursuant to the settlement agreement that was entered
into on June 27, 2008. No appeal or rehearing of the
Bankruptcy Courts order was timely filed by any party, and
the settlement was consummated on March 3, 2009, at which
time, payment was made in accordance with the terms and
conditions of the settlement agreement. Under cost method
accounting, the cost of settlement and the related
$52.9 million liability (less $500,000 which was determined
as the settlement holdback and remained as an accrual pursuant
to the settlement agreement, as amended) was recognized into
income in the first quarter of 2009, resulting in a
$40.4 million gain on settlement of investment in
subsidiary.
Fair
Value Measurements
Effective January 1, 2008, we partially adopted the
provisions of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS No. 157),
which requires us to disclose the fair value of our investments
in unconsolidated trusts and equity securities, including our
investments in Bluegreen and Office Depot. Under this standard,
fair value is defined as the price that would be received upon
the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date (an exit price). In determining fair value, we
are sometimes required to use various valuation techniques.
SFAS No. 157 establishes a hierarchy for inputs used
in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable
inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring
that the most observable inputs be used when available. As a
basis for considering such assumptions, SFAS No. 157
establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes
the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2. Inputs, other than the quoted
prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or
indirectly; and
Level 3. Unobservable inputs, when there
is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity
to develop its own assumptions.
263
When valuation techniques, other than those described as
Level 1 are utilized, management must make estimations and
judgments in determining the fair value for its investments. The
degree to which managements estimation and judgment is
required is generally dependent upon the market pricing
available for the investments, the availability of observable
inputs, the frequency of trading in the investments and the
investments complexity. If we make different judgments
regarding unobservable inputs, we could potentially reach
different conclusions regarding the fair value of our
investments.
Investments
We determine the appropriate classifications of investments in
equity securities at the acquisition date and re-evaluate the
classifications at each balance sheet date. For entities where
we are not deemed to be the primary beneficiary under
FIN No. 46(R) or in which we have less than a
controlling financial interest evaluated under AICPA Statement
of Position
78-9,
Accounting for Investments in Real Estate
Ventures or Emerging Issues Task Force
No. 04-5,
Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General
Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar
Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights,
these entities are accounted for using the equity or cost method
of accounting. Typically, the cost method is used if we own less
than 20% of the investees stock and the equity method is
used if we own more than 20% of the investees stock.
However, we have concluded that the percentage ownership of
stock is not the sole determinant in applying the equity or the
cost method, but the significant factor is whether the investor
has the ability to significantly influence the operating and
financial policies of the investee.
Equity
Method
We follow the equity method of accounting to record our
interests in entities in which we do not own the majority of the
voting stock or record our investment in VIEs in which we are
not the primary beneficiary. These entities consist of Bluegreen
Corporation and statutory business trusts. The statutory
business trusts are VIEs in which we are not the primary
beneficiary. Under the equity method, the initial investment in
a joint venture is recorded at cost and is subsequently adjusted
to recognize our share of the joint ventures earnings or
losses. Distributions received and
other-than-temporary
impairments reduce the carrying amount of the investment.
Cost
Method
We use the cost method for investments where we own less than a
20% interest and do not have the ability to significantly
influence the operating and financial policies of the investee
in accordance with relative accounting guidance.
SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, requires us
to designate our securities as held to maturity, available for
sale, or trading, depending on our intent with regard to our
investments at the time of purchase. There are currently no
securities classified as held to maturity or trading.
Impairment
Securities classified as
available-for-sale
are carried at fair value with net unrealized gains or losses
reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss), but do not impact our results of operations.
Changes in fair value are taken to income when a decline in
value is considered
other-than-temporary.
We review our equity and cost method investments quarterly for
indicators of
other-than-temporary
impairment in accordance with FSP
FAS 115-1/FAS 124-1
and SAB No. 59. This determination requires
significant judgment in which we evaluate, among other factors,
the fair market value of the investments, general market
conditions, the duration and extent to which the fair value of
the investment is less than cost, and our intent and ability to
hold the investment until it recovers. We also consider specific
adverse conditions related to the financial health of, and
business outlook for, the investee, including industry and
sector performance, rating agency actions, changes in
operational and financing cash flow factors. If a decline in the
264
fair value of the investment is determined to be
other-than-temporary,
an impairment charge is recorded to reduce the investment to its
fair value and a new cost basis in the investment is established.
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
We recorded certain intangible assets in connection with our
acquisition of Pizza Fusion. Intangible assets consist primarily
of franchise contracts which were valued using a discounted cash
flow methodology and are amortized over the average life of the
franchise contracts. The estimates of useful lives and expected
cash flows require us to make significant judgments regarding
future periods that are subject to outside factors. In
accordance with SFAS No. 144, we evaluate when events
and circumstances indicate that assets may be impaired and when
the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those
assets are less than their carrying amounts. The carrying value
of these assets is dependent upon estimates of future earnings
that we expect to generate. If cash flows decrease
significantly, intangible assets may be impaired and would be
written down to their fair value.
On at least an annual basis, we conduct a review of our goodwill
in accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS No. 142), to determine whether
the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the fair market value
using a discounted cash flow methodology. In the year ended
December 31, 2006, we conducted an impairment review of the
goodwill related to our Tennessee Homebuilding segment, the
operations of which were comprised of the activities of Bowden
Building Corporation, which we acquired in 2004. We used a
discounted cash flow methodology to determine the amount of
impairment resulting in completely writing off goodwill of
approximately $1.3 million in the year ended
December 31, 2006. The write-off is included in other
expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue and all related costs and expenses from house and land
sales are recognized at the time that closing has occurred, when
title and possession of the property and the risks and rewards
of ownership transfer to the buyer, and when we do not have a
substantial continuing involvement in accordance with
SFAS No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real
Estate (SFAS 66). In order to
properly match revenues with expenses, we estimate construction
and land development costs incurred and to be incurred, but not
paid at the time of closing. Estimated costs to complete are
determined for each closed home and land sale based upon
historical data with respect to similar product types and
geographical areas and allocated to closings along with actual
costs incurred based on a relative sales value approach. To the
extent the estimated costs to complete have significantly
changed, we will adjust cost of sales in the current period for
the impact on cost of sales of previously sold homes and land to
ensure a consistent margin of sales is maintained.
Revenue is recognized for certain land sales on the
percentage-of-completion
method when the land sale takes place prior to all contracted
work being completed. Pursuant to the requirements of
SFAS 66, if the seller has a continuing involvement with
the property and does not transfer substantially all of the
risks and rewards of ownership, profit is recognized based on
the nature and extent of the sellers continuing
involvement. In the case of our land sales, this involvement
typically consists of final development activities. We recognize
revenue and related costs as work progresses using the
percentage-of-completion
method, which relies on estimates of total expected costs to
complete required work. Revenue is recognized in proportion to
the percentage of total costs incurred in relation to estimated
total costs at the time of sale. Actual revenues and costs to
complete construction in the future could differ from our
current estimates. If our estimates of development costs
remaining to be completed and relative sales values are
significantly different from actual amounts, then our revenues,
related cumulative profits and costs of sales may be revised in
the period that estimates change.
Other revenues consist primarily of rental property income,
marketing revenues, irrigation service fees, and title and
mortgage revenue. Irrigation service connection fees are
deferred and recognized systematically over the life of the
irrigation plant. Irrigation usage fees are recognized when
billed as the service is performed. Rental property income
consists of rent revenue from long-term leases of commercial
property. We
265
review all new leases in accordance with SFAS No. 13
Accounting for Leases. If the lease contains
fixed escalations for rent, free-rent periods or upfront
incentives, rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line
basis over the life of the lease.
Effective January 1, 2006, Bluegreen adopted AICPA
Statement of Position
04-02,
Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing
Transactions
(SOP 04-02).
This Statement amends FASB Statement No. 67,
Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of
Real Estate Projects
(FAS No. 67), to state that the
guidance for incidental operations and costs incurred to sell
real estate projects does not apply to real estate time-sharing
transactions. The accounting for those operations and costs is
subject to the guidance in
SOP 04-02.
Bluegreens adoption of
SOP 04-02
resulted in a one-time, non-cash, cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle charge of $4.5 million to Bluegreen
for the year ended December 31, 2006, and accordingly
reduced the earnings in Bluegreen recorded by us by
approximately $1.4 million for the same period.
Income
Taxes
We record income taxes using the liability method of accounting
for deferred income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future
tax consequence of temporary differences between the financial
statement and income tax basis of our assets and liabilities. We
estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which
we operate. This process involves estimating our tax exposure
together with assessing temporary differences resulting from
differing treatment of items, such as deferred revenue, for tax
and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred
tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our
consolidated statements of financial condition. The recording of
a net deferred tax asset assumes the realization of such asset
in the future. Otherwise, a valuation allowance must be recorded
to reduce this asset to its net realizable value. We consider
future pretax income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax
strategies in assessing the need for such a valuation allowance.
In the event that we determine that we may not be able to
realize all or part of the net deferred tax asset in the future,
a valuation allowance for the deferred tax asset is charged
against income in the period such determination is made. See the
section above entitled Information About
Woodbridge Business Recent
Developments for a description of the shareholder rights
plan we adopted in September 2008 which is aimed at preserving
our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards to
offset future taxable income.
We file a consolidated Federal and Florida income tax return.
Separate state returns are filed by subsidiaries that operate
outside the state of Florida. Even though Levitt and Sons and
its subsidiaries have been deconsolidated from Woodbridge for
financial statement purposes, they continue to be included in
our Federal and Florida consolidated tax returns until the
discharge of Levitt and Sons from bankruptcy. See note 21
to our audited consolidated financial statements for information
regarding the bankruptcy filing of Levitt and Sons. As a result
of the deconsolidation of Levitt and Sons, all of Levitt and
Sons net deferred tax assets are no longer presented in
the consolidated statement of financial condition at
December 31, 2008 but remain a part of Levitt and
Sons condensed consolidated financial statements at
December 31, 2008 and accordingly will be part of the tax
return.
We adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
an interpretation of FASB No. 109
(FIN 48), on January 1, 2007. FIN 48
provides guidance on recognition, measurement, presentation and
disclosure in financial statements of uncertain tax positions
that a company has taken or expects to take on a tax return.
FIN 48 substantially changes the accounting policy for
uncertain tax positions. As a result of the implementation of
FIN 48, we recognized a decrease of $260,000 in the
liability for unrecognized tax benefits, which was accounted for
as an increase to the January 1, 2007 balance of retained
earnings. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, we had gross
tax-affected unrecognized tax benefits of $2.4 million, of
which $0.2 million, if recognized, would affect the
effective tax rate.
266
Consolidated
Results of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of real estate
|
|
$
|
1,767
|
|
|
|
2,395
|
|
|
|
(628
|
)
|
|
|
3,194
|
|
|
|
2,549
|
|
|
|
645
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
3,046
|
|
|
|
2,744
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
5,936
|
|
|
|
5,708
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
4,813
|
|
|
|
5,139
|
|
|
|
(326
|
)
|
|
|
9,130
|
|
|
|
8,257
|
|
|
|
873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales of real estate
|
|
|
1,301
|
|
|
|
1,758
|
|
|
|
(457
|
)
|
|
|
1,994
|
|
|
|
1,786
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
10,349
|
|
|
|
12,952
|
|
|
|
(2,603
|
)
|
|
|
21,103
|
|
|
|
25,579
|
|
|
|
(4,476
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
3,747
|
|
|
|
2,532
|
|
|
|
1,215
|
|
|
|
6,520
|
|
|
|
5,556
|
|
|
|
964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
15,397
|
|
|
|
17,242
|
|
|
|
(1,845
|
)
|
|
|
29,617
|
|
|
|
32,921
|
|
|
|
(3,304
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
|
10,714
|
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
9,503
|
|
|
|
17,050
|
|
|
|
1,737
|
|
|
|
15,313
|
|
Impairment of investment in Bluegreen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,401
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,401
|
)
|
Impairment of other investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,396
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,396
|
)
|
Gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,369
|
|
Interest and other income
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
1,950
|
|
|
|
(1,673
|
)
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
|
3,554
|
|
|
|
(2,711
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
(8,942
|
)
|
|
|
9,349
|
|
|
|
14,978
|
|
|
|
(19,373
|
)
|
|
|
34,351
|
|
(Provision) benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
(8,942
|
)
|
|
|
9,349
|
|
|
|
14,978
|
|
|
|
(19,373
|
)
|
|
|
34,351
|
|
Add: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Woodbridge
|
|
$
|
677
|
|
|
|
(8,942
|
)
|
|
|
9,619
|
|
|
|
15,452
|
|
|
|
(19,373
|
)
|
|
|
34,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to the Same
2008 Period:
Consolidated net income attributable to Woodbridge was $677,000
for the three months ended June 30, 2009, as compared to a
consolidated net loss of $8.9 million for the same 2008
period. The increase in net income for the three months ended
June 30, 2009 was mainly associated with the increase of
earnings from Bluegreen in the three months ended June 30,
2009 compared to the same 2008 period. Additionally, there was a
decrease of selling, general and administrative expenses in the
three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same 2008
period. These factors were offset in part by an increase in
interest expense and a decrease in interest and other income in
the three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same
2008 period.
267
Sales
of real estate
The table below summarizes sales of real estate by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Land Division
|
|
$
|
1,408
|
|
|
|
1,711
|
|
|
|
(303
|
)
|
Other Operations
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
(315
|
)
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
1,767
|
|
|
|
2,395
|
|
|
|
(628
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from sales of real estate decreased to
$1.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009
from $2.4 million for the same 2008 period. Revenues from
sales of real estate for the three months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008 in the Land Division were comprised of land sales,
recognition of deferred revenue and revenue related to
incremental revenue received from homebuilders based on the
final resale price to the homebuilders customer
(look back revenue). In Other Operations, revenues
from sales of real estate were comprised of home sales in
Carolina Oak. During the three months ended June 30, 2009,
our Land Division sold 9 lots encompassing approximately
3 acres, generating revenues of approximately $424,000,
compared to the sale of 8 lots encompassing approximately
3 acres, which generated revenues of approximately
$825,000, net of deferred revenue, in the same 2008 period. Our
Land Division recognized deferred revenue on previously sold
land of approximately $1.1 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2009, compared to approximately $758,000 in
the same 2008 period. Look back revenues for the three months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were not significant. In Other
Operations, we earned $320,000 in revenues from sales of real
estate as a result of 1 unit sold in Carolina Oak, compared
to revenues from sales of real estate of $635,000 in the same
2008 period as a result of 2 units sold in Carolina Oak.
Other
Revenues
The table below summarizes other revenues by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land Division
|
|
$
|
2,533
|
|
|
|
2,493
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Other Operations
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
3,046
|
|
|
|
2,744
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenues increased to $3.0 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 from $2.7 million for the
same 2008 period. Other revenues in Other Operations increased
in the three months ended June 30, 2009 as franchise
revenues related to Pizza Fusion were recorded in the three
months ended June 30, 2009. No franchise revenues existed
in the three months ended June 30, 2008 since we acquired
Pizza Fusion in September 2008. We collected more impact fees in
the Land Division in the three months ended June 30, 2009
compared to the same 2008 period associated with an increase in
building permits requested for new construction. These increases
were partially offset by a decrease in marketing fees in the
three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same 2008
period.
268
Cost
of sales of real estate
The table below summarizes cost of sales of real estate by
segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Land Division
|
|
$
|
1,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
Other Operations
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(414
|
)
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
1,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(457
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales of real estate decreased to $1.3 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2009 from $1.8 million
for the same 2008 period due to a decrease in sales of real
estate in Other Operations. In the Land Division, approximately
3 acres were sold in each of the three months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008. In Other Operations, we sold
1 unit in Carolina Oak in the three months ended
June 30, 2009, compared to 2 units sold in the same
2008 period.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
The table below summarizes selling, general and administrative
expenses by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land Division
|
|
$
|
5,162
|
|
|
|
5,320
|
|
|
|
(158
|
)
|
Other Operations
|
|
|
5,209
|
|
|
|
7,651
|
|
|
|
(2,442
|
)
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
10,349
|
|
|
|
12,952
|
|
|
|
(2,603
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to
$10.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009
from $13.0 million for the same 2008 period. The decrease
was a result of, among other things, lower compensation,
benefits and office related expenses reflecting a decrease in
the associate headcount from 105 employees as of
June 30, 2008 to 66 employees as of June 30,
2009, lower severance related expenses, lower insurance costs as
Levitt and Sons related insurance costs were not incurred
after June 30, 2008, decreased sales and marketing
expenses, and lower professional services as we incurred costs
associated with our securities investments in the three months
ended June 30, 2008 while these costs were not incurred in
the three months ended June 30, 2009. These decreases were
partially offset by an increase in depreciation expense in the
three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same 2008
period as depreciation expense related to Cores commercial
assets was not recorded in the three months ended June 30,
2008 while the commercial assets were classified as discontinued
operations. These commercial assets were reclassified back to
continuing operations during the fourth quarter of 2008.
Additionally, we incurred franchise expenses related to Pizza
Fusion in the three months ended June 30, 2009, compared to
no franchise expenses in the same 2008 period as we acquired
Pizza Fusion in September 2008.
269
Interest
expense
The table below summarizes interest expense by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Land Division
|
|
$
|
1,301
|
|
|
|
871
|
|
|
|
430
|
|
Other Operations
|
|
|
2,446
|
|
|
|
2,104
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
3,747
|
|
|
|
2,532
|
|
|
|
1,215
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense consists of interest incurred less interest
capitalized. Interest incurred totaled $4.4 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 and $5.6 million for
the same 2008 period. Interest capitalized totaled $651,000 for
the three months ended June 30, 2009 and $3.1 million
for the same 2008 period. Interest expense increased in the
three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the three
months ended June 30, 2008 primarily as a result of less
qualifying assets for interest capitalization which resulted in
less interest capitalized in the three months ended
June 30, 2009 compared to the same 2008 period. The
increase was partially offset by lower interest rates during the
three months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same 2008
period. At the time of land or home sales, the capitalized
interest allocated to inventory is charged to cost of sales.
Cost of sales of real estate for the three months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 included previously capitalized
interest of approximately $80,000 and $44,000, respectively.
Earnings
from Bluegreen Corporation
Bluegreen reported net income for the three months ended
June 30, 2009 of $6.8 million, as compared to
$3.4 million for the same 2008 period. Our interest in
Bluegreens earnings was $10.7 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 (after the amortization of
approximately $8.6 million related to the change in the
basis as a result of the impairment charges on this investment
during the quarters ended September 30, 2008,
December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009) compared to
$1.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008.
We review our investment in Bluegreen for impairment on a
quarterly basis or as events or circumstances warrant for
other-than-temporary
declines in value. See Note 8 to our unaudited consolidated
financial statements for further details of the impairment
analysis of our investment in Bluegreen.
Interest
and Other Income
Interest and other income decreased to $277,000 for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 from $2.0 million for the
same 2008 period. This decrease was mainly related to a
$1.2 million gain on sale of equity securities in the three
months ended June 30, 2008 compared to no gain on sale of
equity securities in the same 2009 period. In addition, interest
income decreased as a result of lower interest rates as well as
a decrease in our cash balances for the three months ended
June 30, 2009 compared to the same 2008 period.
Income
Taxes
The provision for income taxes is estimated to result in an
effective tax rate of 0.0% in 2009. The effective tax rate used
for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was 0.0%. The 0.0%
effective tax rate is a result of recording a valuation
allowance for those deferred tax assets that are not expected to
be recovered in the future. Due to large losses in the past and
expected taxable losses in the foreseeable future, we may not
have sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character in
the future to realize any portion of the net deferred tax asset.
For
the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to the Same
2008 Period:
Consolidated net income attributable to Woodbridge was
$15.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009,
as compared to a consolidated net loss of $19.4 million for
the same 2008 period. The increase in net income for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 was mainly associated with the
reversal into income of the
270
loss in excess of investment in Levitt and Sons after Levitt
and Sons bankruptcy was finalized. The reversal resulted
in a $40.4 million gain in the six months ended
June 30, 2009. Additionally, earnings from Bluegreen
increased in the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to
the same 2008 period, and we incurred lower selling, general and
administrative expenses in the six months ended June 30,
2009, compared to the same 2008 period. These factors were
offset in part by impairment charges on our investments of
approximately $22.8 million recorded in the six months
ended June 30, 2009 compared to no impairment charges
related to the investments during the same 2008 period, as well
as an increase in interest expense and a decrease in interest
and other income in the six months ended June 30, 2009
compared to the same 2008 period.
Sales
of real estate
The table below summarizes sales of real estate by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land Division
|
|
$
|
2,835
|
|
|
|
1,865
|
|
|
|
970
|
|
Other Operations
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
(315
|
)
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
3,194
|
|
|
|
2,549
|
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from sales of real estate increased to
$3.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009
from $2.5 million for the same 2008 period. Revenues from
sales of real estate for the six months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008 were comprised of land sales, recognition of deferred
revenue and look back revenue. In Other Operations, revenues
from sales of real estate were comprised of home sales in
Carolina Oak. During the six months ended June 30, 2009,
our Land Division sold approximately 13 acres, generating
revenues of approximately $1.1 million, compared to the
sale of approximately 3 acres, which generated revenues of
approximately $898,000, net of deferred revenue, in the same
2008 period. Our Land Division recognized deferred revenue on
previously sold land of approximately $1.9 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to approximately
$768,000 in the same 2008 period. Look back revenues for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were approximately
$32,000 and $90,000, respectively. In Other Operations, we
earned $320,000 in revenues from sales of real estate as a
result of 1 unit sold in Carolina Oak, compared to revenues
from sales of real estate of $635,000 in the same 2008 period as
a result of 2 units sold in Carolina Oak.
Other
revenues
The table below summarizes other revenues by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Land Division
|
|
$
|
4,810
|
|
|
|
5,198
|
|
|
|
(388
|
)
|
Other Operations
|
|
|
1,143
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
633
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
5,936
|
|
|
|
5,708
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenues increased to $5.9 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 from $5.7 million for the same
2008 period. Other revenues in Other Operations increased in the
six months ended June 30, 2009 as franchise revenues
related to Pizza Fusion were recorded in the six months ended
June 30, 2009. No franchise revenues existed in the six
months ended June 30, 2008 since we acquired Pizza Fusion
in September 2008. The decrease in Land Division revenues was
primarily due to a decrease in marketing fees collected, and
straight line rent amortization associated with tenant
improvement reimbursements. These decreases were partially
offset by an increase in rental revenues in the Land Division
due to additional tenants.
271
Cost
of sales of real estate
The table below summarizes cost of sales of real estate by
segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Land Division
|
|
$
|
1,806
|
|
|
|
1,173
|
|
|
|
633
|
|
Other Operations
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
(414
|
)
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
1,994
|
|
|
|
1,786
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales of real estate increased to $2.0 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2009 from $1.8 million
for the same 2008 period due to an increase in sales of real
estate in our Land Division, partially offset by a decrease in
sales of real estate in Other Operations. In the Land Division,
approximately 13 acres were sold in the six months ended
June 30, 2009 compared to approximately 3 acres sold
in the same 2008 period. In Other Operations, we sold
1 unit in Carolina Oak in the six months ended
June 30, 2009, compared to 2 units sold in the same
2008 period.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
The table below summarizes selling, general and administrative
expenses by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Land Division
|
|
$
|
11,409
|
|
|
|
10,851
|
|
|
|
558
|
|
Other Operations
|
|
|
9,716
|
|
|
|
14,747
|
|
|
|
(5,031
|
)
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
21,103
|
|
|
|
25,579
|
|
|
|
(4,476
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to
$21.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009
from $25.6 million for the same 2008 period. The decrease
was a result of, among other things, lower compensation,
benefits and office related expenses reflecting a decrease in
the associate headcount from 105 employees as of
June 30, 2008 to 66 employees as of June 30,
2009, lower severance related expenses, lower insurance costs as
Levitt and Sons related insurance costs were not incurred
after June 30, 2008, decreased sales and marketing
expenses, and lower professional services as we incurred costs
associated with our securities investments in the six months
ended June 30, 2008 while these costs were not incurred in
the six months ended June 30, 2009. These decreases were
partially offset by an increase in depreciation expense in the
six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same 2008
period as depreciation expense related to Cores commercial
assets was not recorded in the six months ended June 30,
2008 while the commercial assets were classified as discontinued
operations. These commercial assets were reclassified back to
continuing operations during the fourth quarter of 2008.
Additionally, we incurred franchise expenses related to Pizza
Fusion in the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to
no franchise expenses in the same 2008 period as we acquired
Pizza Fusion in September 2008.
272
Interest
expense
The table below summarizes interest expense by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
Change
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Land Division
|
|
$
|
2,671
|
|
|
|
1,864
|
|
|
|
807
|
|
Other Operations
|
|
|
3,849
|
|
|
|
4,777
|
|
|
|
(928
|
)
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,085
|
)
|
|
|
1,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$
|
6,520
|
|
|
|
5,556
|
|
|
|
964
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense consists of interest incurred less interest
capitalized. Interest incurred totaled $8.8 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2009 and $11.8 million for
the same 2008 period. Interest capitalized totaled
$2.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009
and $6.3 million for the same 2008 period. Interest expense
increased in the six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to
the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily as a result of
less qualifying assets for interest capitalization which
resulted in less interest capitalized in the six months ended
June 30, 2009 compared to the same 2008 period. The
increase was partially offset by lower interest rates during the
six months ended June 30, 2009 compared to the same 2008
period. At the time of land or home sales, the capitalized
interest allocated to inventory is charged to cost of sales.
Cost of sales of real estate for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 included previously capitalized
interest of approximately $80,000 and $44,000, respectively.
Earnings
from Bluegreen Corporation
Bluegreen reported net income for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 of $10.4 million, as compared to
$4.8 million for the same 2008 period. Our interest in
Bluegreens earnings was $17.1 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 (after the amortization of
approximately $13.9 million related to the change in the
basis as a result of the impairment charges on this investment
during the quarters ended September 30, 2008,
December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009) compared to
$1.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008.
Interest
and Other Income
Interest and other income decreased to $843,000 during the six
months ended June 30, 2009 from $3.6 million during
the same 2008 period. This decrease was mainly related to a
$1.2 million gain on sale of equity securities in the six
months ended June 30, 2008 compared to no gain on sale of
equity securities in the same 2009 period. In addition, interest
income decreased as a result of lower interest rates as well as
a decrease in our cash balances for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 compared to the same 2008 period.
Income
Taxes
The provision for income taxes is estimated to result in an
effective tax rate of 0.0% in 2009. The effective tax rate used
for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was 0.0%. The 0.0%
effective tax rate is a result of recording a valuation
allowance for those deferred tax assets that are not expected to
be recovered in the future. Due to large losses in the past and
expected taxable losses in the foreseeable future, we may not
have sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character in
the future to realize any portion of the net deferred tax asset.
273
Land
Division Operational Data Three and Six Months
Ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Acres sold
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Margin percentage(a)
|
|
|
21.0
|
%
|
|
|
33.1
|
%
|
|
|
(12.1
|
)%
|
|
|
36.3
|
%
|
|
|
37.1
|
%
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)%
|
Unsold saleable acres
|
|
|
6,626
|
|
|
|
6,676
|
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
6,626
|
|
|
|
6,676
|
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
Acres subject to sales contracts third parties(b)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
(318
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
|
(318
|
)
|
Aggregate sales price of acres subject to sales contracts to
third parties (in thousands)(b)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
96,164
|
|
|
|
(96,164
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,164
|
|
|
|
(96,164
|
)
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes revenues from look back provisions and recognition of
deferred revenue associated with sales in prior periods. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
As of June 30, 2009, approximately 8 acres were
subject to a sales contract with a sales price which could range
from $3.0 million to $3.9 million at a cost of
approximately $2.2 million. The sale is contingent upon the
purchaser obtaining financing and, if consummated on the
contemplated terms, would not result in a loss. |
Due to the nature and size of individual land transactions, our
Land Division results have historically fluctuated
significantly. Although we have historically realized margins of
between approximately 40.0% and 60.0% on Land Division sales,
margins on land sales have recently been, and are expected to
continue to be, below the historical range given the downturn in
the real estate markets and the significant decrease in demand.
In addition to the impact of economic and market factors, the
sales price and margin of land sold varies depending upon: the
location; the parcel size; whether the parcel is sold as raw
land, partially developed land or individually developed lots;
the degree to which the land is entitled; and whether the
designated use of the land is residential or commercial. The
cost of sales of real estate is dependent upon the original cost
of the land acquired, the timing of the acquisition of the land,
the amount of land development, and interest and real estate tax
costs capitalized to the particular land parcel during active
development. Allocations to cost of sales involve significant
management judgment and include an estimate of future costs of
development, which can vary over time due to labor and material
cost increases, master plan design changes and regulatory
modifications. Accordingly, allocations are subject to change
based on factors which are in many instances beyond
managements control. Future margins will continue to vary
based on these and other market factors. If conditions in the
real estate markets do not improve or deteriorate further, we
may not be able to sell land at prices above our carrying cost
or even in amounts necessary to repay our indebtedness.
The value of acres subject to third party sales contracts ranged
from $3.0 million to $3.9 million at June 30,
2009 compared to $96.2 million at June 30, 2008. While
backlog is not an exclusive indicator of future sales activity,
it provides an indication of potential future sales activity.
Financial
Condition as of June 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008
Our total assets at June 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008 were $530.3 million and $559.3 million,
respectively. The change in total assets primarily resulted from:
|
|
|
|
|
a net decrease in cash and cash equivalents of
$56.6 million, primarily related to cash used in operations
offset by approximately $40.3 million repositioned into
investment in timed deposits; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in restricted cash of $13.4 million mainly
associated with the settlement payment made in connection with
the bankruptcy of Levitt and Sons.
|
274
Total liabilities at June 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008 were $384.3 million and $439.7 million,
respectively. The change in total liabilities primarily resulted
from:
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease of $52.9 million associated with the reversal
into income of the loss in excess of investment in Levitt and
Sons as a result of the Bankruptcy Courts approval of the
Levitt and Sons bankruptcy plan; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
a net decrease in accounts payable and other accrued liabilities
of approximately $1.1 million primarily attributable to the
timing of payments to our vendors.
|
Consolidated
Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Vs. 2007
|
|
|
Vs. 2006
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of real estate
|
|
$
|
13,837
|
|
|
|
410,115
|
|
|
|
566,086
|
|
|
|
(396,278
|
)
|
|
|
(155,971
|
)
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
11,701
|
|
|
|
10,458
|
|
|
|
9,241
|
|
|
|
1,243
|
|
|
|
1,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
25,538
|
|
|
|
420,573
|
|
|
|
575,327
|
|
|
|
(395,035
|
)
|
|
|
(154,754
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales of real estate
|
|
|
12,728
|
|
|
|
573,241
|
|
|
|
482,961
|
|
|
|
(560,513
|
)
|
|
|
90,280
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
50,754
|
|
|
|
117,924
|
|
|
|
121,151
|
|
|
|
(67,170
|
)
|
|
|
(3,227
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
10,867
|
|
|
|
3,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,060
|
|
|
|
3,807
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,929
|
|
|
|
3,677
|
|
|
|
(3,929
|
)
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
74,349
|
|
|
|
698,901
|
|
|
|
607,789
|
|
|
|
(624,552
|
)
|
|
|
91,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
|
8,996
|
|
|
|
10,275
|
|
|
|
9,684
|
|
|
|
(1,279
|
)
|
|
|
591
|
|
Impairment of investment in Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
|
(94,426
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(94,426
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of other investments
|
|
|
(14,120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income
|
|
|
8,030
|
|
|
|
11,264
|
|
|
|
7,844
|
|
|
|
(3,234
|
)
|
|
|
3,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(140,331
|
)
|
|
|
(256,789
|
)
|
|
|
(14,934
|
)
|
|
|
116,458
|
|
|
|
(241,855
|
)
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,169
|
|
|
|
5,770
|
|
|
|
(22,169
|
)
|
|
|
16,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(140,331
|
)
|
|
|
(234,620
|
)
|
|
|
(9,164
|
)
|
|
|
94,289
|
|
|
|
(225,456
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per share(c)
|
|
$
|
(7.35
|
)
|
|
|
(30.00
|
)
|
|
|
(2.27
|
)
|
|
|
22.65
|
|
|
|
(27.73
|
)
|
Total diluted loss per share(a)(c)
|
|
$
|
(7.35
|
)
|
|
|
(30.00
|
)
|
|
|
(2.29
|
)
|
|
|
22.65
|
|
|
|
(27.71
|
)
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding(b)(c)
|
|
|
19,088
|
|
|
|
7,821
|
|
|
|
4,045
|
|
|
|
11,267
|
|
|
|
3,776
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding(b)(c)
|
|
|
19,088
|
|
|
|
7,821
|
|
|
|
4,045
|
|
|
|
11,267
|
|
|
|
3,776
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Diluted loss per share takes into account (i) the dilution
in earnings we recognize from Bluegreen as a result of
outstanding securities issued by Bluegreen that enable the
holders thereof to acquire shares of Bluegreens common
stock and (ii) the dilutive effect of our stock options and
restricted stock using the treasury stock method. |
|
(b) |
|
The weighted average number of common shares outstanding in
basic and diluted loss per common share for 2006 were
retroactively adjusted for a number of shares representing the
bonus element arising from the rights offering that closed on
October 1, 2007. Under the rights offering, shares of our
Class A common stock were issued on October 1, 2007 at
a purchase price below the market price of such shares on |
275
|
|
|
|
|
that date resulting in the bonus element of 1.97%. The number of
weighted average shares of Class A common stock was
retroactively increased by this percentage for 2006. |
|
(c) |
|
On September 26, 2008, we effected a
one-for-five
reverse stock split. As a result of the reverse stock split,
each five shares of our Class A Common Stock outstanding at
the time of the reverse stock split automatically converted into
one share of Class A Common Stock and each five shares of
our Class B Common Stock outstanding at the time of the
reverse stock split automatically converted into one share of
Class B Common Stock. Accordingly, all share and per share
data presented herein for prior periods have been retroactively
adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split. |
As of November 9, 2007, the accounts of Levitt and Sons
were deconsolidated from our consolidated statements of
financial condition and statements of operations. Therefore, the
financial data and comparative analysis in the preceding table
reflected operations through November 9, 2007 related to
the Primary Homebuilding and Tennessee Homebuilding segments
compared to full year results of operations in 2006, with the
exception of Carolina Oak which was included in the above table
for the full year in 2007 since this subsidiary was not part of
the Chapter 11 Cases.
For
the Year Ended December 31, 2008 Compared to the Year Ended
December 31, 2007
We incurred a consolidated net loss of $140.3 million for
the year ended December 31, 2008 as compared to a
consolidated net loss of $234.6 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007. During 2008, we recorded impairment
charges of $112.0 million, of which $108.5 million
related to our investments and $3.5 million related to
Carolina Oaks inventory of real estate, compared to
impairment charges of $226.9 million related to Levitt and
Sons inventory of real estate recorded during 2007 in cost
of sales. Levitt and Sons incurred a net loss of
$231.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2007,
which represented 98.6% of our consolidated net loss for that
period. As previously disclosed, we deconsolidated Levitt and
Sons as of November 9, 2007. Excluding the results of
Levitt and Sons, the net loss increased by $135.0 million
for the year ended December 31, 2008, primarily due to
impairment charges recorded in 2008 relating to our investments
in Bluegreen, Office Depot and unconsolidated trusts, and
impairment charges relating to Carolina Oaks inventory of
real estate. No impairment charges related to these items were
recorded in 2007. In addition, our total revenues decreased in
both the Land Division and Other Operations segment during 2008
as sales of real estate decreased reflecting a further
deterioration of the real estate markets, interest expense
increased because less assets qualified for interest
capitalization, our earnings from Bluegreen decreased as
Bluegreens net income decreased in 2008 compared to 2007
and the benefit for income taxes decreased as our effective tax
rate for 2008 was 0.0% compared to 8.6% in 2007.
Revenues from sales of real estate decreased to
$13.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008
from $410.1 million for the year ended December 31,
2007. This decrease was primarily attributable to the
deconsolidation of Levitt and Sons at November 9, 2007 as
well as a decrease in sales of real estate in the Land Division
and Other Operations. Levitt and Sons revenues from sales
of real estate amounted to $387.7 million in 2007. Revenues
from sales of real estate for the year ended December 31,
2008 in the Land Division decreased to $11.3 million, from
$16.6 million in 2007 reflecting the sale of approximately
35 acres in 2008 compared to 40 acres in 2007. In
Other Operations, revenues from sales of real estate for the
year ended December 31, 2008 were $2.5 million
reflecting the delivery of 8 units in Carolina Oak,
compared to revenues from sales of real estate of
$6.6 million in Levitt Commercial reflecting the delivery
of 17 units in 2007.
Other revenues increased $1.2 million to $11.7 million
for the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to
$10.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2007.
Other revenues increased primarily as a result of higher leasing
revenues due to the opening of the Landing at Tradition retail
power center in late 2007. The increase was offset in part by
decreased title and mortgage operations revenues associated with
Levitt and Sons as it was not included in the consolidated
results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2008.
In addition, there was decreased marketing income associated
with Tradition, Florida.
Cost of sales of real estate decreased to $12.7 million
during the year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to
$20.7 million (excluding cost of sales, which included
impairment provisions, associated with
276
Levitt and Sons) for the year ended December 31, 2007 as
sales of real estate decreased in the Land Division and Other
Operations. Cost of sales of real estate in the Land Division
decreased as we sold approximately 35 acres in the year
ended December 31, 2008, compared to approximately
40 acres in 2007. In Other Operations, we delivered
8 units in Carolina Oak in the year ended December 31,
2008, compared to the delivery of 17 units in Levitt
Commercial in 2007. In addition, we recorded $3.5 million
of impairment charges related to Carolina Oaks inventory
of real estate in 2008, compared to $9.3 million in
impairment charges related to capitalized interest in Other
Operations recorded in 2007.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased
$67.2 million to $50.8 million during the year ended
December 31, 2008 compared to $117.9 million during
the year ended December 31, 2007. This decrease was
primarily related to the deconsolidation of Levitt and Sons at
November 9, 2007. Selling, general and administrative
expenses attributable to Levitt and Sons in the year ended
December 31, 2007 were $66.6 million. Consolidated
selling, general and administrative expenses, excluding those
attributable to Levitt and Sons, remained relatively unchanged
in 2008 compared to 2007 totaling $50.8 million in the year
ended December 31, 2008, and $51.3 million in 2007. We
incurred higher property management expenses related to our
commercial leasing activities, higher property tax expense due
to less acreage in active development and higher expenses
related to the support of community and commercial associations
in our master-planned communities in the Land Division as well
as higher other administrative expenses associated with
marketing activities in South Carolina in 2008 compared to 2007.
In addition, depreciation expenses were higher in 2008 mainly as
a result of a depreciation recapture related to the
reclassification of discontinued operations, and insurance costs
were higher due to the absorption of certain of Levitt and
Sons insurance costs. The above increases were offset by
lower office related expenses, decreased severance charges and
decreased employee compensation, benefits and incentives expense
reflecting a lower associate headcount in the year ended
December 31, 2008 compared to 2007 as a result of staff
reductions. The number of employees decreased to
84 employees at December 31, 2008 from
125 employees at December 31, 2007.
Interest expense consists of interest incurred minus interest
capitalized. Interest incurred for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 totaled $22.4 million and
$50.8 million, respectively, while interest capitalized
totaled $11.5 million for the year ended December 31,
2008 compared to $47.0 million in 2007. Interest expense
for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $10.9 million
compared to $3.8 million in 2007. The increase in interest
expense was due to the completion of certain phases of
development associated with our real estate inventory late in
2007, which resulted in a decreased amount of assets which
qualified for interest capitalization and, therefore, the
expensing of the related interest was only recorded in the
fourth quarter of 2007 compared to the full year of 2008.
Interest incurred was lower mainly due to decreases in the
average interest rates on our debt and lower outstanding
balances of notes and mortgage notes payable primarily due to
the deconsolidation of Levitt and Sons at November 9, 2007.
At the time of land or home sales, the capitalized interest
allocated to inventory is charged to cost of sales. Cost of
sales of real estate for the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007 included previously capitalized interest of
approximately $326,000 and $17.9 million, respectively.
We did not incur other expenses in the year ended
December 31, 2008, compared to $3.9 million in 2007,
which consisted of a surety bond accrual, a write-off of
leasehold improvements and title and mortgage operations
expense. Due to the cessation of most development activity at
Levitt and Sons projects, we evaluated Woodbridges
exposure on the surety bonds and letters of credit supporting
any Levitt and Sons projects based on indemnities Woodbridge
provided to the bond holders and recorded $1.8 million in
surety bonds accrual related to certain bonds where management
considered it probable that reimbursement of the surety under
the applicable indemnity agreement would be required. In
addition to the surety bond accrual, the Other Operations
segment also recorded a write-off of leasehold improvements. As
part of reductions in workforce, we vacated certain leased
space. Leasehold improvements in the amount of $564,000 related
to the vacated space will not be recovered and were written-off
in the year ended December 31, 2007. In addition, title and
mortgage operations expense related to Levitt and Sons was
$1.5 million.
Bluegreen reported a net loss for the year ended
December 31, 2008 of $516,000, compared to net income of
$31.9 million in 2007. For the year ended December 31,
2008, our interest in Bluegreens earnings was
$9.0 million (after the amortization of approximately
$9.2 million related to the change in the basis as a
277
result of the impairment charge on this investment at
September 30, 2008), compared to $10.3 million in
2007. We review our investment in Bluegreen for impairment on a
quarterly basis or as events or circumstances warrant for
other-than-temporary
declines in value. Based on the evaluations performed, we
recorded an
other-than-temporary
impairment charge of $53.6 million at September 30,
2008 and an additional
other-than-temporary
impairment charge of $40.8 million at December 31,
2008.
Interest and other income decreased to $8.0 million in the
year ended December 31, 2008, from $11.3 million in
2007. This decrease was related to a $5.8 million decrease
in forfeited deposits in 2008 due to the deconsolidation of
Levitt and Sons at November 9, 2007. The decrease was
partially offset by a $2.5 million gain on sale of property
and equipment and a $1.2 million gain on sale of equity
securities during 2008.
We had an effective tax rate of 0.0% in the year ended
December 31, 2008 compared to 8.6% in the year ended
December 31, 2007. The decrease in the effective tax rate
is a result of recording a valuation allowance for those
deferred tax assets that are not expected to be recovered in the
future. Due to large taxable losses in 2007 and 2008 and
expected taxable losses in the foreseeable future, we may not
have sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character in
the future and prior carryback years to realize any portion of
the net deferred tax asset. At December 31, 2008, we had
$155.6 million in gross deferred tax assets. After
consideration of $2.3 million of deferred tax liabilities,
a valuation allowance of $154.1 million was recorded. The
increase in the valuation allowance from December 31, 2007
is $75.5 million. See the section above entitled
Information About Woodbridge
Business Recent Developments for a description
of the shareholder rights plan we adopted during September 2008
which is aimed at preserving our ability to use our net
operating loss carryforwards to offset future taxable income.
For
the Year Ended December 31, 2007 Compared to the Year Ended
December 31, 2006
We had a consolidated net loss of $234.6 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007 as compared to a net loss of
$9.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2006. The
significant loss in the year ended December 31, 2007 was
the result of $226.9 million of impairment charges recorded
relating to inventory of real estate of which
$217.6 million was recorded in the Homebuilding Division
and $9.3 million was recorded in the Other Operations
segment related to capitalized interest. This compares to
$36.8 million of impairment charges recorded in the year
ended December 31, 2006. In addition, there were decreased
sales of real estate and margins on sales of real estate by all
segments, and higher selling, general and administrative
expenses in the Other Operations segment and our Land Division.
Interest expense was $3.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 while there was no interest expense in
2006. These increased expenses and lower sales of real estate
were slightly offset by higher interest and other income as a
result of higher interest income and forfeited deposits, and an
increase in other revenues related to increased commercial lease
activity generating higher rental revenues.
Revenues from sales of real estate decreased to
$410.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007
from $566.1 million for the year ended December 31,
2006. This decrease was attributable to fewer homes delivered in
the Homebuilding Division, and fewer sales in both Other
Operations and the Land Division. The Homebuilding Division had
lower revenue despite the average sales price of units delivered
increasing to $321,000 in 2007 compared to $302,000 in the same
period in 2006 due to the number of deliveries decreasing to
1,144 homes as compared to 1,660 homes during the same period in
2006. In Other Operations, Levitt Commercial delivered
17 units during the year ended December 31, 2007
recording $6.6 million in revenues compared to
29 units during the year ended December 31, 2006 and
$11.0 million in revenues. The Land Division sold
approximately 40 acres in the year ended December 31,
2007 as compared to 371 acres in 2006. These decreases were
slightly offset by an increase in land sales recorded by the
Homebuilding Division which totaled $20.1 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007 while there were no comparable
sales in 2006.
Other revenues increased $1.2 million to $10.5 million
for the year ended December 31, 2007, from
$9.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2006,
due to increased commercial lease activity generating higher
rental revenues, offset in part by lower title and mortgage
operations revenues due to fewer closings.
278
Cost of sales of real estate increased $90.3 million to
$573.2 million during the year ended December 31,
2007, as compared to $483.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006. The increase in cost of sales was due to
increased impairment charges in an aggregate amount of
$226.9 million recorded in 2007 compared to
$36.8 million recorded in 2006. In addition, included in
cost of sales was approximately $18.8 million associated
with sales by both segments of the Homebuilding Division of land
that management decided not to develop further, while there were
no similar sales or costs in 2006. These increases were offset
by lower cost of sales due to fewer land sales recorded by the
Land Division and the Other Operations segment and fewer units
delivered by both segments of the Homebuilding Division.
Consolidated margin percentage declined during the year ended
December 31, 2007 to a negative margin of 39.8% compared to
a margin of 14.7% in the year ended December 31, 2006
primarily related to the impairment charges recorded in the
Homebuilding Division and Other Operations segment. Consolidated
gross margin excluding impairment charges was 15.5% in the year
ended December 31, 2007 compared to a gross margin of 21.2%
in 2006. The decline was associated with significant discounts
offered in 2007 in an attempt to reduce cancellations and
encourage buyers to close, aggressive pricing discounts on
spec units and a lower margin being earned on land
sales.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased
$3.2 million to $117.9 million during the year ended
December 31, 2007 compared to $121.2 million during
the year ended December 31, 2006 primarily as a result of
decreased employee compensation and benefits and other general
and administrative charges in the Homebuilding Division and
Other Operations as a result of the multiple reductions in force
that occurred in 2007. In addition, annual incentive
compensation recorded in 2007 was significantly less throughout
all segments of the business compared to the year ended
December 31, 2006 due to the significant reductions in
force in the Homebuilding Division and significant operating
losses in 2007. In addition, Levitt and Sons was deconsolidated
as of November 9, 2007 and the selling, general and
administrative expenses of Levitt and Sons were reflected
through November 9, 2007 compared to a full year of
selling, general and administrative expenses in 2006. These
decreases were slightly offset by increased selling, general and
administrative expenses in the Land Division segment related to
operating costs associated with the commercial leasing business
and increasing activity in the master-planned community in
Tradition Hilton Head and restructuring related expenses
recorded in Other Operations and the Homebuilding Division in
the amount of $7.4 million which included severance related
expenses, facilities expenses, and independent contractor
expenses. As a percentage of total revenues, selling, general
and administrative expenses increased to 28.0% during the year
ended December 31, 2007, from 21.1% during 2006 as a result
of decreased revenues.
Interest incurred totaled $50.8 million and
$42.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2007
and 2006, respectively. While all interest was capitalized in
the year ended December 31, 2006, only $47.0 million
was capitalized in 2007. This resulted in interest expense of
$3.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2007,
compared to no interest expense in the same period in 2006. The
increase in interest expense was due to the completion of
certain phases of development associated with our real estate
inventory, which resulted in a decreased amount of assets which
qualified for interest capitalization in 2007 compared to 2006.
Interest incurred was higher due to higher average debt balances
for the year ended December 31, 2007 as compared to the
same period in 2006, as well as increases in the average
interest rate on our variable-rate debt. At the time of home
closings and land sales, the capitalized interest allocated to
such inventory is charged to cost of sales. Cost of sales of
real estate for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
included previously capitalized interest of approximately
$17.9 million and $15.4 million, respectively.
Other expenses increased slightly to $3.9 million during
the year ended December 31, 2007 from $3.7 million in
2006. In the year ended December 31, 2007, we recorded a
surety bond accrual of $1.8 million that did not exist in
2006. In addition to the surety bond accrual, the Other
Operations segment also recorded a write-off of leasehold
improvements which did not exist in 2006. As part of the
reductions in force discussed above and the Chapter 11
Cases, we vacated certain leased space. Leasehold improvements
in the amount of $564,000 related to the vacated space will not
be recovered and were written-off in the year ended
December 31, 2007. These increases were offset as we did
not record a write-down of goodwill in 2007, compared to the
write-down of goodwill in 2006 of approximately
$1.3 million associated with the Tennessee Homebuilding
segment. In addition, title and mortgage expense decreased due
to the decrease in closings.
279
Bluegreen reported net income for the year ended
December 31, 2007 of $31.9 million, as compared to net
income of $29.8 million in 2006. In the first quarter of
2006, Bluegreen adopted
SOP 04-02
and recorded a one-time, non-cash, cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle charge of $4.5 million, which
contributed to the slight increase in 2007. Our interest in
Bluegreens income was $10.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007 compared to $9.7 million in
2006.
Interest and other income increased from $7.8 million
during the year ending December 31, 2006 to
$11.3 million during the same period in 2007. The increase
was due to higher forfeited deposits on cancelled contracts in
our Homebuilding Division as well as higher interest income due
to the investment of the proceeds from the Rights Offering.
The benefit for income taxes had an effective rate of 8.6% in
the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to 38.6% in the
year ended December 31, 2006. The decrease in the effective
tax rate was the result of recording a valuation allowance in
the year ended December 31, 2007 for those deferred tax
assets that are not expected to be recovered in the future. At
December 31, 2007, we had $102.6 million in gross
deferred tax assets. After consideration of $24.0 million
of deferred tax liabilities and the ability to carryback losses,
a valuation allowance of $78.6 million was recorded. The
increase in the valuation allowance from December 31, 2006
was $78.1 million.
Land
Division Results of Operations for the Years Ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Vs. 2007
|
|
|
Vs. 2006
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of real estate
|
|
$
|
11,268
|
|
|
|
16,567
|
|
|
|
69,778
|
|
|
|
(5,299
|
)
|
|
|
(53,211
|
)
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
10,592
|
|
|
|
7,585
|
|
|
|
3,816
|
|
|
|
3,007
|
|
|
|
3,769
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
21,860
|
|
|
|
24,152
|
|
|
|
73,594
|
|
|
|
(2,292
|
)
|
|
|
(49,442
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales of real estate
|
|
|
6,632
|
|
|
|
7,447
|
|
|
|
42,662
|
|
|
|
(815
|
)
|
|
|
(35,215
|
)
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
24,608
|
|
|
|
19,077
|
|
|
|
15,119
|
|
|
|
5,531
|
|
|
|
3,958
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
3,637
|
|
|
|
2,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,008
|
|
|
|
2,629
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
34,877
|
|
|
|
29,153
|
|
|
|
57,781
|
|
|
|
5,724
|
|
|
|
(28,628
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income
|
|
|
5,685
|
|
|
|
4,489
|
|
|
|
2,650
|
|
|
|
1,196
|
|
|
|
1,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(7,332
|
)
|
|
|
(512
|
)
|
|
|
18,463
|
|
|
|
(6,820
|
)
|
|
|
(18,975
|
)
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,910
|
)
|
|
|
(6,936
|
)
|
|
|
5,910
|
|
|
|
1,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)income
|
|
$
|
(7,332
|
)
|
|
|
(6,422
|
)
|
|
|
11,527
|
|
|
|
(910
|
)
|
|
|
(17,949
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acres sold(a)
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(331
|
)
|
Margin percentage(b)
|
|
|
41.1
|
%
|
|
|
55.0
|
%
|
|
|
38.9
|
%
|
|
|
(13.9
|
)%
|
|
|
16.1
|
%
|
Unsold saleable acres
|
|
|
6,639
|
|
|
|
6,679
|
|
|
|
6,871
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
Acres subject to sales contracts Third parties
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
|
|
185
|
|
Aggregate sales price of acres subject to sales contracts to
third parties
|
|
$
|
1,050
|
|
|
|
77,888
|
|
|
|
21,124
|
|
|
|
(76,838
|
)
|
|
|
56,764
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes 5 acres sold related to commercial projects. |
|
(b) |
|
Margin percentage is calculated by dividing margin (sales of
real estate minus cost of sales of real estate) by sales of real
estate. Sales of real estate and margin percentage include lot
sales, revenues from look back provisions and recognition of
deferred revenue associated with sales in prior periods. |
280
Due to the nature and size of individual land transactions, our
Land Division results are subject to significant volatility.
Although we have historically realized margins of between
approximately 40.0% and 60.0% on Land Division sales, margins on
land sales are likely to be below the historical range given the
downturn in the real estate markets and the significant decrease
in demand in Florida. Margins will fluctuate based upon changing
sales prices and costs attributable to the land sold. In
addition to the impact of economic and market factors, the sales
price and margin of land sold varies depending upon: the
location; the parcel size; whether the parcel is sold as raw
land, partially developed land or individually developed lots;
the degree to which the land is entitled; and whether the
designated use of the land is residential or commercial. The
cost of sales of real estate is dependent upon the original cost
of the land acquired, the timing of the acquisition of the land,
the amount of land development and interest and real estate tax
costs capitalized to the particular land parcel during active
development. Allocations to cost of sales involve significant
management judgment and include an estimate of future costs of
development, which can vary over time due to labor and material
cost increases, master plan design changes and regulatory
modifications. Accordingly, allocations are subject to change
based on factors which are in many instances beyond
managements control. Future margins will continue to vary
based on these and other market factors. If conditions in the
real estate markets do not improve or deteriorate further, we
may not be able to sell land at prices above our carrying cost
or even in amounts necessary to repay our indebtedness.
The number and sales value of acres subject to third party sales
contracts decreased to 10 acres with a sales value of
$1.1 million at December 31, 2008, compared with
259 acres with a sales value of $77.9 million at
December 31, 2007. While the backlog is not an exclusive
indicator of future sales activity; it provides an indication of
potential future sales activity. In addition, contracts in the
backlog are subject to cancellation.
For
the Year Ended December 31, 2008 Compared to the Year Ended
December 31, 2007
Revenues from sales of real estate decreased to
$11.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2008,
compared to $16.6 million in 2007. Sales of real estate in
Tradition, Florida for the year ended December 31, 2008
consisted of the sale of 31 acres generating revenues of
$8.0 million, net of deferred revenue, as compared to the
sale of 37 acres generating revenues of $12.7 million,
net of deferred revenue, in 2007. In addition, in the year ended
December 31, 2008, we sold 11 lots encompassing
approximately 4 acres in Tradition Hilton Head, recognizing
revenues of $1.1 million, net of deferred revenue, compared
to the sale of 9 residential lots encompassing approximately
3 acres, recognizing revenues of $1.1 million, net of
deferred revenue, in 2007. In addition, revenues for the year
ended December 31, 2008 included look back
revenue of $145,000 compared to $1.5 million in the year
ended December 31, 2007. Look back revenue
relates to incremental revenue received from homebuilders based
on the final resale price to the homebuilders customer. We
also recognized deferred revenue on previously sold bulk land
and residential lots totaling approximately $1.9 million
for the year ended December 31, 2008, compared to
recognition of deferred revenue of approximately
$1.3 million in 2007. These amounts included approximately
$159,000 and $733,000 in 2008 and 2007, respectively, of
intercompany sales in prior periods and were eliminated in
consolidation.
Other revenues increased approximately $3.0 million to
$10.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008,
compared to $7.6 million during 2007. The increase was
primarily the result of higher leasing revenues associated with
the opening of the Landing at Tradition retail power center in
late 2007. This increase was offset in part by decreased
marketing income associated with Tradition, Florida.
Cost of sales decreased $815,000 to $6.6 million during the
year ended December 31, 2008, as compared to
$7.4 million in 2007 due to the decrease in sales of real
estate. Costs of sales for the year ended December 31, 2008
represents the costs associated with the sale of approximately
35 acres of land compared to the costs associated with the
sale of approximately 40 acres in 2007.
Margin percentage decreased to 41.1% in the year ended
December 31, 2008 from 55.0% in the year ended
December 31, 2007. The decrease in margin is attributable
to a decrease in the average sales price per acre and less
lookback revenue recognized in 2008 compared to
2007. Lookback revenue margin percentage is 100%
because the associated costs were fully expensed at the time of
closing.
281
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased to
$24.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2008
compared to $19.1 million in 2007. The increase was
primarily due to higher other administrative expenses associated
with increased marketing activities in Tradition Hilton Head,
higher repairs and maintenance expenses related to damages from
tropical storms and higher depreciation expense associated with
the South Carolina irrigation facility placed in service in 2008
and a depreciation recapture as a result of the reclassification
of discontinued operations. Additionally, we incurred higher
property management expenses related to our commercial leasing
activities, higher compensation and benefits expenses, higher
expenses associated with our support of the community and
commercial associations in our master-planned communities and
higher property tax expense due to the completion of certain
projects in the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to
2007. These increases were offset in part by a decrease in
incentives and commissions expense.
Interest incurred for the years ended December 31, 2008 and
2007 was $12.0 million and $14.4 million,
respectively, while interest capitalized totaled
$8.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008
compared to $11.8 million during 2007. This resulted in
interest expense of $3.6 million in the year ended
December 31, 2008, compared to $2.6 million in 2007.
The interest expense in the year ended December 31, 2008 of
approximately $3.6 million mainly related to
$1.1 million of interest expense associated with an
intercompany loan with the Parent Company from funds borrowed by
Core and approximately $2.5 million due to the completion
of certain phases of development associated with our real estate
inventory which resulted in a decreased amount of assets which
qualified for interest capitalization. The interest expense in
the year ended December 31, 2007 of approximately
$2.6 million was attributable to the intercompany loan
mentioned above. The capitalization of this interest occurred at
the Parent Company level and all intercompany interest expense
and income was eliminated in consolidation. Interest incurred
was lower in 2008 due to decreases in the average interest rates
on our notes and mortgage notes payable, partly offset by higher
average debt balances for the year ended December 31, 2008
compared to 2007. At the time of land sales, the capitalized
interest allocated to such inventory is charged to cost of
sales. Cost of sales of real estate for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 included previously capitalized
interest of approximately $84,000 and $66,000, respectively.
Interest and other income increased to $5.7 million in the
year ended December 31, 2008, from $4.5 million in the
year ended December 31, 2007. Interest and other income
increased primarily due to a $2.5 million gain on sale of
property and equipment and higher forfeited deposits in 2008
compared to 2007. The increase was partially offset by lower
intercompany interest income related to the intercompany loan
mentioned above.
For
the Year Ended December 31, 2007 Compared to the Year Ended
December 31, 2006
Revenues from sales of real estate decreased to
$16.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2007,
compared to $69.8 million in 2006. Sales of real estate in
Tradition, Florida for the year ended December 31, 2007
consisted of the sale of 37 acres generating revenues of
$12.7 million, net of deferred revenue, as compared to the
sale of 208 acres generating revenues of $51.2 million
in 2006. In 2007, demand for residential land in Tradition,
Florida slowed dramatically. In addition, in the year ended
December 31, 2007, we sold 9 residential lots encompassing
approximately 3 acres in Tradition Hilton Head generating
revenues of $1.1 million, net of deferred revenue, compared
to sales to third parties in Tradition Hilton Head encompassing
10 acres generating revenues of $4.7 million in the
year ended December 31, 2006 and an additional
150 acres transferred to Carolina Oak which was eliminated
in consolidation. In addition, revenues for the year ended
December 31, 2007 included look back revenues
of $1.5 million compared to $870,000 in the year ended
December 31, 2006. We also recognized deferred revenue on
previously sold bulk land and residential lots totaling
approximately $1.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007, of which $733,000 related to sales to
affiliated segments and was eliminated in consolidation. There
was no similar activity for the year ended December 31,
2006.
Other revenues increased approximately $3.8 million to
$7.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2007,
compared to $3.8 million during 2006. This was due to
increased revenues related to irrigation services
282
provided to homebuilders, commercial users and the residents of
Tradition, Florida, marketing income associated with Tradition,
Florida, and leasing revenues associated with our commercial
leasing business.
Cost of sales decreased $35.2 million to $7.4 million
during the year ended December 31, 2007, as compared to
$42.7 million for the same period in 2006 due to the
decrease in sales of real estate.
Margin percentage increased to 55.0% in the year ended
December 31, 2007 from 38.9% in the year ended
December 31, 2006. The increase in margin was primarily due
to increased commercial sales in 2007 which generated a higher
margin and 100% margin percentage being realized on
lookback revenue because the associated costs were
fully expensed at the time of closing.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased to
$19.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2007
compared to $15.1 million in the same period in 2006. The
increase was the result of higher employee compensation and
benefits, increased operating costs associated with the
commercial leasing business and increased other general and
administrative costs. The number of full time employees
increased to 67 at December 31, 2007, from 59 at
December 31, 2006, as additional personnel were added to
support development activity in Tradition Hilton Head. General
and administrative costs increased due to increased expenses
associated with our commercial leasing activities, increased
legal expenditures, increased insurance costs and increased
marketing and advertising expenditures designed to attract
buyers in Florida and establish a market presence in South
Carolina.
Interest incurred for the years ended December 31, 2007 and
2006 was $14.4 million and $6.7 million, respectively.
Interest capitalized totaled $11.8 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007 compared to $6.7 million
during 2006. The interest expense in the year ended
December 31, 2007 of approximately $2.6 million was
attributable to funds borrowed by Core Communities but then
loaned to Woodbridge. The capitalization of this interest
occurred at the consolidated level and all intercompany interest
expense and income was eliminated on a consolidated basis. As
noted above, interest incurred was higher due to higher
outstanding balances of notes and mortgage notes payable and an
increase in the average interest rate on variable-rate debt. At
the time of land sales, the capitalized interest allocated to
such inventory is charged to cost of sales. Cost of sales of
real estate for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
included previously capitalized interest of approximately
$66,000 and $443,000, respectively.
Interest and other income increased from $2.7 million
during the year ending December 31, 2006, to
$4.5 million during 2007. Interest and other income
increased primarily due to higher intercompany interest income
associated with the aforementioned intercompany loan to
Woodbridge which was eliminated in consolidation. The increase
was partially offset by a gain on sale of fixed assets which
totaled $1.3 million in the year ended December 31,
2006 compared to $20,000 in 2007.
283
Other
Operations Results of Operations for the Years Ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Vs. 2007
|
|
|
Vs. 2006
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of real estate
|
|
$
|
2,484
|
|
|
|
6,574
|
|
|
|
11,041
|
|
|
|
(4,090
|
)
|
|
|
(4,467
|
)
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
952
|
|
|
|
1,435
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
(483
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
3,593
|
|
|
|
7,526
|
|
|
|
12,476
|
|
|
|
(3,933
|
)
|
|
|
(4,950
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales of real estate
|
|
|
16,151
|
|
|
|
16,793
|
|
|
|
11,649
|
|
|
|
(642
|
)
|
|
|
5,144
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
26,717
|
|
|
|
32,508
|
|
|
|
28,174
|
|
|
|
(5,791
|
)
|
|
|
4,334
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
8,315
|
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,242
|
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,390
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(2,390
|
)
|
|
|
2,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
51,183
|
|
|
|
52,764
|
|
|
|
39,831
|
|
|
|
(1,581
|
)
|
|
|
12,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
|
8,996
|
|
|
|
10,275
|
|
|
|
9,684
|
|
|
|
(1,279
|
)
|
|
|
591
|
|
Impairment of investment in Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
|
(94,426
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(94,426
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of other investments
|
|
|
(14,120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income
|
|
|
4,001
|
|
|
|
7,367
|
|
|
|
4,059
|
|
|
|
(3,366
|
)
|
|
|
3,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(143,139
|
)
|
|
|
(27,596
|
)
|
|
|
(13,612
|
)
|
|
|
(115,543
|
)
|
|
|
(13,984
|
)
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,297
|
|
|
|
5,639
|
|
|
|
(34,297
|
)
|
|
|
28,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(143,139
|
)
|
|
|
6,701
|
|
|
|
(7,973
|
)
|
|
|
(149,840
|
)
|
|
|
14,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Other Operations segment includes the operations of the
Parent Company, Carolina Oak, and Pizza Fusion, other activities
through Cypress Creek Capital and Snapper Creek, an equity
investment in Bluegreen and an investment in Office Depot. We
currently own approximately 9.5 million shares of the
common stock of Bluegreen, which represents approximately 31% of
Bluegreens outstanding shares as of December 31,
2008. Under equity method accounting, we recognize our pro-rata
share of Bluegreens net income (net of purchase accounting
adjustments) as pre-tax earnings. Bluegreen has not paid
dividends to its shareholders; therefore, our earnings represent
only our claim to the future distributions of Bluegreens
earnings. Accordingly, we record a tax liability on our portion
of Bluegreens net income. Our earnings in Bluegreen
increase or decrease concurrently with Bluegreens reported
results. Furthermore, a significant reduction in
Bluegreens financial position could potentially result in
additional impairment charges on our investment against our
future results of operations. For a complete discussion of
Bluegreens results of operations and financial position,
we refer you to the financial statements of Bluegreen which are
filed as exhibits to the registration statement of which this
joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part.
For
the Year Ended December 31, 2008 Compared to the Year Ended
December 31, 2007
Sales of real estate in the year ended December 31, 2008
were $2.5 million reflecting the delivery of 8 units
in Carolina Oak, compared to sales of real estate of
$6.6 million in 2007 reflecting the delivery of
17 units at Levitt Commercial. There were no units in
backlog at December 31, 2008 or December 31, 2007.
Levitt Commercial completed the sale of all remaining flex
warehouse units in inventory in 2007 and ceased development
activities thereafter.
Other revenues in the year ended December 31, 2008 were
$1.1 million compared to $952,000 in 2007. The increase was
due to an increase in leasing revenues.
Cost of sales of real estate in the year ended December 31,
2008 was $16.2 million compared to $16.8 million in
2007. Cost of sales of real estate for the year ended
December 31, 2008 related to the
284
delivery of 8 units in Carolina Oak and a $3.5 million
impairment charge related to Carolina Oaks inventory of
real estate while cost of sales of real estate in 2007 was
comprised of the cost of sales of the 17 units delivered in
Levitt Commercial, the expensing of interest previously
capitalized and capitalized interest impairment charges related
to the cessation of development on certain Levitt and Sons
projects.
Bluegreen reported a net loss for the year ended
December 31, 2008 of $516,000, as compared to net income of
$31.9 million in 2007. For the year ended December 31,
2008, our interest in Bluegreens income was
$9.0 million (after the amortization of approximately
$9.2 million related to the change in the basis as a result
of the impairment charge at September 30, 2008), compared
to $10.3 million in 2007. We review our investment in
Bluegreen for impairment on a quarterly basis or as events or
circumstances warrant for
other-than-temporary
declines in value. Based on the evaluations performed, we
recorded an
other-than-temporary
impairment charge of $53.6 million at September 30,
2008 and an additional
other-than-temporary
impairment charge of $40.8 million at December 31,
2008. See note 10 to our audited consolidated financial
statements for further details of the impairment analysis of our
investment in Bluegreen.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased
$5.8 million to $26.7 million during the year ended
December 31, 2008 compared to $32.5 million in 2007.
The decrease was attributable to decreased compensation and
benefits expenses, decreased office related expenses and
decreased severance charges related to the reductions in
workforce associated with the bankruptcy filing of Levitt and
Sons. The decrease in compensation, benefits and office related
expenses is attributable to decreased headcount, as the number
of employees decreased from 47 at December 31, 2007 to 29
at December 31, 2008. These decreases were offset in part
by increases in professional fees associated with our
investments and the bankruptcy filing of Levitt and Sons, and
increased insurance costs due to the absorption of certain of
Levitt and Sons insurance costs.
Interest incurred was approximately $11.5 million and
$10.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively, while interest capitalized totaled
$3.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008
compared to $9.8 million during 2007. This resulted in
interest expense of $8.3 million in the year ended
December 31, 2008, compared to $1.1 million in 2007.
The increase in interest expense was due to the completion of
certain phases of development associated with our real estate
inventory late in 2007, which resulted in a decreased amount of
assets which qualified for interest capitalization and,
therefore, the expensing of the related interest was only
recorded in the fourth quarter of 2007 compared to the full year
of 2008. The increase in interest incurred was attributable to
higher average debt balances for the year ended
December 31, 2008 compared to 2007, offset in part by lower
average interest rates. Cost of sales of real estate in the year
ended December 31, 2008 included previously capitalized
interest of approximately $242,000, which primarily related to
the delivery of 8 units in Carolina Oak, compared to
approximately $250,000 in 2007 related to the delivery of
17 units in Levitt Commercial.
We did not incur other expenses in the year ended
December 31, 2008. Other expenses for the year ended
December 31, 2007 were $2.4 million and consisted of a
surety bonds accrual and a write-off of leasehold improvements.
In 2007, we recorded $1.8 million in surety bonds accrual
related to certain bonds where management considered it probable
that reimbursement of the surety under the applicable indemnity
agreement would be required. In addition to the surety bond
accrual, we also recorded a write-off of leasehold improvements
as we vacated certain leased space as part of our workforce
reductions and the Levitt and Sons bankruptcy. Leasehold
improvements in the amount of $564,000 related to this vacated
space will not be recovered and were written off in the year
ended December 31, 2007.
Interest and other income was approximately $4.0 million
for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to
$7.4 million in 2007. This decrease was primarily the
result of our realization of interest income related to
intersegment loans to the Primary and Tennessee Homebuilding
segments in the year ended December 31, 2007 which was
eliminated in consolidation, whereas no comparable interest
income was realized during 2008.
For
the Year Ended December 31, 2007 Compared to the Year Ended
December 31, 2006
Revenue from sales of real estate was $6.6 million in the
year ended December 31, 2007 compared to $11.0 million
in the year ended December 31, 2006. Levitt Commercial
delivered 17 flex warehouse units in
285
2007 while 29 units were delivered during 2006. Levitt
Commercial completed the sale of all flex warehouse units in
inventory in 2007.
Other revenues decreased to $952,000 in the year ended
December 31, 2007 from $1.4 million in 2006 due to the
reduction in leasing revenue received from a
sub-tenant
in one office building.
Cost of sales of real estate increased to $16.8 million
during the year ended December 31, 2007, as compared to
$11.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2006
due to an increase of $9.3 million in capitalized interest
impairment charges. This increase was offset in part by a
decrease of $3.8 million in cost of sales related to fewer
deliveries of commercial warehouse units, as we delivered 12
fewer flex warehouse units in the year ended December 31,
2007 as compared to 2006. In addition, interest in Other
Operations is amortized to cost of sales in accordance with the
relief rate used in the Companys operating segments, and
due to the lower sales in 2007, the operating segments
experienced decreased interest amortization which resulted in
less amortization by the Other Operations segment.
Bluegreen reported net income for the year ended
December 31, 2007 of $31.9 million, as compared to net
income of $29.8 million in 2006. In the first quarter of
2006, Bluegreen adopted
SOP 04-02
and recorded a one-time, non-cash, cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle charge of $4.5 million, which
contributed to the slight increase in 2007. Our interest in
Bluegreens income was $10.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007 compared to $9.7 million in
2006.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased
$4.3 million to $32.5 million during the year ended
December 31, 2007 compared to $28.2 million in 2006.
The increase was attributable to $5.1 million of
restructuring related charges associated with Woodbridge and
Levitt and Sons employees. In the third and fourth quarters of
2007, substantially all of Levitt and Sons employees were
terminated and 22 employees were terminated at Woodbridge
primarily as a result of the Chapter 11 Cases. Woodbridge
recorded approximately $2.4 million in the year ended
December 31, 2007 of severance benefits to terminated
Levitt and Sons employees to supplement the limited termination
benefits which could be paid by Levitt and Sons to those
employees. The restructuring related expenses were slightly
offset by lower stock based compensation and annual incentive
compensation expense as a result of the multiple reductions in
force that occurred in 2007 and significant operating losses in
2007. The decrease in non-cash stock based compensation expense
was attributable to the large number of employee terminations
that occurred in 2007 which resulted in a reversal of stock
compensation amounts previously accrued. The reversal related to
forfeited options in connection with the terminations.
Interest incurred in Other Operations was approximately
$10.8 million and $7.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. While all
interest was capitalized in the year ended December 31,
2006, $9.8 million was capitalized in 2007 due to a
decreased level of development associated with a portion of our
real estate inventory which resulted in a decreased amount of
qualified assets for interest capitalization. The increase in
interest incurred was attributable to an increase in the average
balance of our borrowings as a result of our issuance of trust
preferred securities during 2006, and the aforementioned funds
borrowed by Core Communities but then loaned to Woodbridge.
Other expenses increased to $2.4 million during the year
ended December 31, 2007 from $8,000 in 2006. In the year
ended December 31, 2007, we recorded a $1.8 million
surety bond accrual that did not exist in 2006. In addition to
the surety bond accrual, the Other Operations segment also
recorded a write-off of leasehold improvements which also did
not exist in 2006. As part of the reductions in force discussed
above and the Chapter 11 Cases, we vacated certain leased
space. Leasehold improvements in the amount of $564,000 related
to this vacated space will not be recovered and were written off
in the year ended December 31, 2007.
Interest and other income was approximately $7.4 million
for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to
$4.1 million in 2006. This increase was primarily the
result of the Rights Offering we completed in October 2007, the
proceeds of which resulted in higher average cash balances at
the Parent Company in the year ended December 31, 2007
which generated higher interest income, as well as interest
income related to
286
intersegment loans to the Primary and Tennessee Homebuilding
segments which were eliminated in consolidation.
Primary
Homebuilding Segment Results of Operations for the Years Ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
vs. 2007
|
|
|
vs. 2006
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except average price data)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of real estate
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
345,666
|
|
|
|
424,420
|
|
|
|
(345,666
|
)
|
|
|
(78,754
|
)
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,243
|
|
|
|
4,070
|
|
|
|
(2,243
|
)
|
|
|
(1,827
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
347,909
|
|
|
|
428,490
|
|
|
|
(347,909
|
)
|
|
|
(80,581
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales of real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
501,206
|
|
|
|
367,252
|
|
|
|
(501,206
|
)
|
|
|
133,954
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,568
|
|
|
|
65,052
|
|
|
|
(61,568
|
)
|
|
|
(3,484
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,258
|
)
|
|
|
7,258
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,539
|
|
|
|
2,362
|
|
|
|
(1,539
|
)
|
|
|
(823
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
571,571
|
|
|
|
434,666
|
|
|
|
(571,571
|
)
|
|
|
136,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,933
|
|
|
|
2,982
|
|
|
|
(6,933
|
)
|
|
|
3,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(216,729
|
)
|
|
|
(3,194
|
)
|
|
|
216,729
|
|
|
|
(213,535
|
)
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,396
|
|
|
|
1,508
|
|
|
|
(1,396
|
)
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
(215,333
|
)
|
|
|
(1,686
|
)
|
|
|
215,333
|
|
|
|
(213,647
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homes delivered
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
998
|
|
|
|
1,320
|
|
|
|
(998
|
)
|
|
|
(322
|
)
|
Construction starts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
558
|
|
|
|
1,445
|
|
|
|
(558
|
)
|
|
|
(887
|
)
|
Average selling price of homes delivered
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
338,000
|
|
|
|
322,000
|
|
|
|
(338,000
|
)
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
Margin percentage(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45.0
|
)%
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
|
|
45.0
|
%
|
|
|
(58.5
|
)%
|
Gross sales contracts (units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
|
1,108
|
|
|
|
(765
|
)
|
|
|
(343
|
)
|
Sales contracts cancellations (units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
(382
|
)
|
|
|
121
|
|
Net orders (units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
847
|
|
|
|
(383
|
)
|
|
|
(464
|
)
|
Net orders (value)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
94,782
|
|
|
|
324,217
|
|
|
|
(94,782
|
)
|
|
|
(229,435
|
)
|
Backlog of homes (units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,126
|
)
|
Backlog of homes (value)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
411,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(411,578
|
)
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Margin percentage is calculated by dividing margin (sales of
real estate minus cost of sales of real estate) by sales of real
estate. |
As of November 9, 2007, the accounts of Levitt and Sons
were deconsolidated from our consolidated statements of
financial condition and statements of operations. Therefore, the
financial data and comparative analysis in the table above
reflected operations through November 9, 2007 in the
Primary Homebuilding segment compared to full year results of
operations in 2006, with the exception of the results of
Carolina Oak which were included in the above results for the
full year in 2007 since this subsidiary was not part of the
Chapter 11 Cases. Carolina Oaks results of operations
were immaterial to the segment, but were included in the Primary
Homebuilding segment because it was engaged in homebuilding
activities and because the financial metrics from this company
were similar in nature to the other homebuilding projects within
this segment that existed in 2006 and 2007.
287
There are no results of operations or financial metrics included
in the preceding table for the year ended December 31, 2008
due to the deconsolidation of Levitt and Sons from our
consolidated financial statements at November 9, 2007.
Therefore, a comparative analysis is not included in this
section. For further information regarding Levitt and Sons
results of operations, see note 24 to our audited
consolidated financial statements.
Historically, the results of operations of Carolina Oak were
included as part of the Primary Homebuilding segment. The
results of operations of Carolina Oak after January 1, 2008
are included in the Other Operations segment as a result of the
deconsolidation of Levitt and Sons at November 9, 2007, and
the acquisition of Carolina Oak by Woodbridge.
For
the Year Ended December 31, 2007 Compared to the Year Ended
December 31, 2006
Revenues from sales of real estate decreased to
$345.7 million during the year ended December 31,
2007, from $424.4 million during 2006 despite the increase
in average sales price of deliveries from $322,000 in 2006 to
$338,000 in 2007. During the year ended December 31, 2007,
998 homes were delivered compared to 1,320 homes delivered
during 2006. The decrease in units delivered was partially
offset by increased land sales. We recognized $8.0 million
of revenue attributable to the sale of land that management
decided not to develop further, while there were no land sales
in 2006.
Other revenues decreased $1.8 million to $2.2 million
for the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to
$4.1 million during 2006. Other revenues in the Primary
Homebuilding segment decreased due to lower revenues from our
title company due to fewer closings.
Cost of sales increased to $501.2 million during the year
ended December 31, 2007, compared to $367.3 million
for 2006. The increase was primarily due to the increased
impairment charges on inventory of real estate and an increase
in cost of sales associated with the land sale that occurred in
the year ended December 31, 2007 slightly offset by a
decrease in cost of sales due to a fewer number of deliveries.
Impairment charges were $206.4 million in the year ended
December 31, 2007 compared to $31.1 million in
impairment charges in 2006.
Margin percentage (defined as sales of real estate minus cost of
sales of real estate, divided by sales of real estate) declined
to a negative 45.0% in the year ended December 31, 2007
from 13.5% in the year ended December 31, 2006 mainly
attributable to the impairment charges recorded in the year
ended December 31, 2007. Margin percentage excluding
impairments declined from 20.8% in the year ended
December 31, 2006 to 14.7% during the year ended
December 31, 2007. This decline was primarily attributable
to significant discounts offered in an effort to reduce
cancellations and to encourage buyers to close, and aggressive
pricing discounts on spec units as well as lower margin earned
on the $8.0 million land sale mentioned above.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to
$61.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2007,
compared to $65.1 million in 2006 primarily as a result of
lower employee compensation and benefits expense and decreased
office and administrative expenses as a result of the multiple
reductions in force that occurred in 2007. In addition, no
annual incentive compensation was recorded in 2007 for the
Primary Homebuilding segment. In addition, Levitt and Sons was
deconsolidated as of November 9, 2007 and the selling,
general and administrative expenses of Levitt and Sons were
reflected through November 9, 2007 compared to a full year
of selling, general and administrative expenses in 2006. These
decreases were offset in part by increased legal costs primarily
related to the preparation of the Levitt and Sons bankruptcy
filing. As a percentage of total revenues, selling, general and
administrative expense was approximately 17.7% for the year
ended December 31, 2007 compared to 15.2% in 2006.
Interest incurred totaled $31.2 million and
$27.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2007
and 2006, respectively. While all interest was capitalized
during the year ended December 31, 2006, $23.9 million
in interest was capitalized during the year ended
December 31, 2007 due to a decreased level of development
occurring in the projects in the Primary Homebuilding segment in
2007 which resulted in a decreased amount of qualified assets
for interest capitalization. Interest incurred increased as a
result of higher average debt balances for the year ended
December 31, 2007 as compared to 2006. At the time of home
closings and land sales, the capitalized interest allocated to
such inventory was charged to cost of sales. Cost of sales of
real
288
estate for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006
included previously capitalized interest of approximately
$14.1 million and $9.7 million, respectively.
Other expenses decreased to $1.5 million during the year
ended December 31, 2007 from $2.4 million in 2006 as a
result of a decrease in title and mortgage expense. Title and
mortgage expense mostly relates to closing costs and title
insurance costs for closings processed internally. These costs
were lower in 2007 due to the decrease in closings.
Interest and other income increased from $3.0 million
during the year ended December 31, 2006 to
$6.9 million during 2007 mainly as a result of an increase
in forfeited deposits of $3.5 million resulting from
increased cancellations of home sale contracts.
Tennessee
Homebuilding Segment Results of Operations for the Years Ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Vs. 2007
|
|
|
Vs. 2006
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except average price data)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of real estate
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
42,042
|
|
|
|
76,299
|
|
|
|
(42,042
|
)
|
|
|
(34,257
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,042
|
|
|
|
76,299
|
|
|
|
(42,042
|
)
|
|
|
(34,257
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales of real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,360
|
|
|
|
72,807
|
|
|
|
(51,360
|
)
|
|
|
(21,447
|
)
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,010
|
|
|
|
12,806
|
|
|
|
(5,010
|
)
|
|
|
(7,796
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
151
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,307
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,521
|
|
|
|
86,920
|
|
|
|
(56,521
|
)
|
|
|
(30,399
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,396
|
)
|
|
|
(10,494
|
)
|
|
|
14,396
|
|
|
|
(3,902
|
)
|
(Provision) benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,700
|
)
|
|
|
3,241
|
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
|
|
(4,941
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
(16,096
|
)
|
|
|
(7,253
|
)
|
|
|
16,096
|
|
|
|
(8,843
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homes delivered
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
Construction starts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
Average selling price of homes delivered
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
205,000
|
|
|
|
224,000
|
|
|
|
(205,000
|
)
|
|
|
(19,000
|
)
|
Margin percentage(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22.2
|
)%
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
22.2
|
%
|
|
|
(26.8
|
)%
|
Gross sales contracts (units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
Sales contracts cancellations (units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
Net orders (units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
Net orders (value)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
20,621
|
|
|
|
57,776
|
|
|
|
(20,621
|
)
|
|
|
(37,155
|
)
|
Backlog of homes (units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
Backlog of homes (value)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,662
|
)
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Margin percentage is calculated by dividing margin (sales of
real estate minus cost of sales of real estate) by sales of real
estate. |
As of November 9, 2007, the accounts of Levitt and Sons
were deconsolidated from our consolidated statements of
financial condition and statements of operations. Therefore, the
financial data and comparative
289
analysis in the above table reflects the operations of the
Tennessee Homebuilding segment through November 9, 2007
compared to full year results of operations in 2006.
There are no results of operations or financial metrics included
in the preceding table for the year ended December 31, 2008
due to the deconsolidation of Levitt and Sons from our
consolidated financial statements at November 9, 2007.
Therefore, a comparative analysis is not included in this
section. For further information regarding Levitt and Sons
results of operations, see note 24 to our audited
consolidated financial statements.
For
the Year Ended December 31, 2007 Compared to the Year Ended
December 31, 2006
Revenues from sales of real estate decreased to
$42.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2007,
from $76.3 million during 2006. During the year ended
December 31, 2007, 146 homes were delivered at an average
sales price of $205,000 as compared to 340 homes delivered at an
average price of $224,000 during the year ended
December 31, 2006. The average sales prices of homes
delivered in 2007 declined due to the product mix sold,
discounts on deliveries, and aggressive pricing on spec sales.
This decrease was offset by an increase of $11.1 million of
revenue recognized related to a land sale that occurred in the
year ended December 31, 2007 related to property that
management decided to not develop further. There were no land
sales in 2006. Additionally, included in revenues are certain
lot sales occurring in the year ended December 31, 2007.
Cost of sales of real estate decreased to $51.4 million
during the year ended December 31, 2007, as compared to
$72.8 million during 2006 due to a decrease in home
deliveries. The decrease in home deliveries was offset by
increased impairment charges related to inventory, and increased
cost of sales associated with land sales. Included in cost of
sales in the year ended December 31, 2007 was
$11.1 million associated with land sales. There were no
land sales in 2006. In addition, impairment charges increased
$5.5 million from $5.7 million in the year ended
December 31, 2006 to $11.2 million in the year ended
December 31, 2007.
Margin percentage decreased to a negative margin of 22.2% in the
year ended December 31, 2007 from 4.6% in the year ended
December 31, 2006. The decrease in margin percentage was
primarily attributable to impairment charges, which increased by
$5.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2007
compared to 2006. Margin percentage excluding impairment charges
declined from 12.0% during the year ended December 31, 2006
to 4.6% during the year ended December 31, 2007 due to the
mix of homes delivered with lower average selling prices and
minimal to no margin being generated on the land or lot sales
that occurred during the period.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased
$7.8 million to $5.0 million during the year ended
December 31, 2007 compared to $12.8 million during
2006 primarily as a result of lower employee compensation and
benefits, decreased broker commission costs and decreased
advertising and marketing costs. The decrease in employee
compensation and benefits was mainly a result of the multiple
reductions in force that occurred in 2007 in connection with the
filing of the Levitt and Sons bankruptcy. Decreased broker
commission costs were due to lower revenues generated in the
year ended December 31, 2007 compared to 2006 and the
decreases associated with marketing and advertising are
attributable to a decreased focus in 2007 on advertising in the
Tennessee market. In addition, selling, general and
administrative expenses related to the Tennessee Homebuilding
segment are reflected through November 9, 2007 compared to
a full year of selling, general and administrative expenses in
2006. These decreases were offset in part by increased severance
related expense related to Tennessee employees, payroll taxes
and other benefits associated with the terminations that
occurred in 2007.
Interest incurred totaled $1.9 million and
$2.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2007 and
2006, respectively. While all interest was capitalized during
the year ended December 31, 2006, $1.8 million in
interest was capitalized during the year ended December 31,
2007 due to the decreased level of development in the projects
in this segment in 2007 which resulted in less assets being
qualified for interest capitalization. Interest incurred
decreased as a result of lower average debt balances for the
year ended December 31, 2007 as compared to 2006. At the
time of home closings and land sales, the capitalized interest
allocated to such inventory was charged to cost of sales. Cost
of sales of real estate for the years ended December 31,
2007 and 2006 included previously capitalized interest of
approximately $1.3 million and $2.1 million,
respectively.
290
There were no other expenses in the year ended December 31,
2007 compared to $1.3 million in 2006. Other expenses in
the year ended December 31, 2006 reflected the write-off of
$1.3 million in goodwill related to the Bowden acquisition.
Financial
Condition as of December 31, 2008 and 2007
Our total assets at December 31, 2008 and 2007 were
$559.3 million and $712.9 million, respectively. The
change in total assets primarily resulted from:
|
|
|
|
|
a net decrease in cash and cash equivalents of
$80.4 million, which resulted from cash used in operations
of $32.9 million, cash used in investing activities of
$41.9 million and cash used in financing activities of
$5.6 million;
|
|
|
|
an increase in restricted cash of $19.1 million primarily
related to the funding of the Levitt and Sons Settlement
Agreement, providing collateral for a letter of credit as a
result of a surety bond claim and the establishment of an
interest reserve for one of Cores loan agreements;
|
|
|
|
a decrease in current income tax receivable as a result of the
receipt of a $29.7 million federal income tax refund;
|
|
|
|
a decrease in our investment in Bluegreen of $86.2 million
as a result of impairment charges recorded during 2008;
|
|
|
|
a net increase of our investment in other equity securities of
$4.3 million as a result of the acquisition (net of shares
sold) of shares of Office Depot and a $3.0 million
investment in Pizza Fusion;
|
|
|
|
an increase in our investment in certificates of deposit of
$9.6 million as a result of our investment in FDIC insured
certificates of deposit in 2008;
|
|
|
|
a net increase in inventory of real estate of $14.0 million
primarily associated with the land development activities of the
Land Division; and
|
|
|
|
a decrease in property and equipment of $8.8 million due to
the sale of three ground lease parcels and a depreciation
adjustment related to the reclassification into continuing
operations of two of Cores commercial leasing assets
previously classified as discontinued operations.
|
Total liabilities at December 31, 2008 and 2007 were
$439.7 million and $451.7 million, respectively. The
change in total liabilities primarily resulted from:
|
|
|
|
|
a net decrease in notes and mortgage notes payable of
$3.8 million primarily due to curtailment payments made in
connection with a development loan collateralized by land in
Tradition Hilton Head, offset in part by draws on lines of
credit in the Land Division;
|
|
|
|
an increase in our current tax liability of approximately
$2.4 million relating to our FIN 48 liability which
was netted against our current tax asset in 2007; and
|
|
|
|
a net decrease in accounts payable and other accrued liabilities
of approximately $8.1 million primarily attributable to
decreased severance and construction accruals due to payments
made during the year ended December 31, 2008.
|
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Management assesses our liquidity in terms of our cash and cash
equivalent balances and our ability to generate cash to fund our
operating and investment activities. We separately manage our
liquidity at the Parent Company level and at the operating
subsidiary level. Subsidiary operations, consisting primarily of
Core Communities operations, are generally financed using
proceeds from sales of real estate inventory and debt financing
using land or other developed assets as loan collateral. Many of
the financing agreements contain covenants at the subsidiary
level. Parent Company guarantees are provided only in limited
circumstances and, when provided, are generally provided on a
limited basis. Available cash and our borrowing capacity may be
used to pursue the development of our master-planned communities
or to pursue investments. We also have
291
explored possible ways to monetize a portion of our investment
in certain of Cores assets through joint ventures or other
strategic relationships, including the possible sale of such
assets or possible public or private offerings of debt or equity
securities at Core. We have historically utilized community
development districts to fund development costs at Core when
possible. We also have used available cash to repay borrowings
and to pay operating expenses.
We believe that our current financial condition and credit
relationships, together with anticipated cash flows from
operations and other sources of funds, which may include
proceeds from the disposition of certain properties or
investments, will provide for our anticipated near-term
liquidity needs. We expect to meet our long-term liquidity
requirements through the means described above and, as
determined to be appropriate by our board of directors and
management, long-term secured and unsecured indebtedness, and
future issuances of equity
and/or debt
securities. As previously discussed, we expect to continue to
conduct our business, both prior to and, as a wholly owned
subsidiary of BFC, after the effective time of the merger, in
the usual and ordinary course. This may include, among other
things, the continued pursuit of investments and acquisitions
within or outside of the real estate industry and the continued
support of our existing investments, including additional
investments in affiliates such as Bluegreen.
Woodbridge
(Parent Company level)
As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, Woodbridge
had cash and short-term certificates of deposits, of
$97.9 million and $107.3 million, respectively. Cash
at the Parent Company level decreased by $9.4 million
during the six months ended June 30, 2009 primarily due to
general and administrative expenses and debt service costs.
As of December 31, 2007, Woodbridge had cash of
$162.0 million. Our cash decreased by $54.7 million
during the year ended December 31, 2008 primarily due to
the repayment of a $40.0 million intercompany loan to Core,
the acquisition (net of shares sold) of 1,435,000 shares of
Office Depot common stock for an aggregate cost (net of proceeds
received from shares sold) of $16.3 million, severance
related payments of approximately $4.9 million, a
$3.0 million investment in Pizza Fusion and an increase in
restricted cash of $16.4 million primarily related to
funding the Levitt and Sons Settlement Agreement, and providing
$4.3 million as collateral for a letter of credit. These
decreases were offset in part by the receipt of approximately
$29.7 million of a federal income tax refund and the
receipt from Core of a $30.0 million cash dividend payment.
The remaining balance was used in operations and to pay accrued
expenses.
In October 2007, Woodbridge acquired from Levitt and Sons all of
the membership interests in Carolina Oak, which owns a
150 acre parcel in Tradition Hilton Head. In connection
with this acquisition, the credit facility collateralized by the
150 acre parcel (the Carolina Oak Loan) was
modified, and Woodbridge became the obligor under the Carolina
Oak Loan. Woodbridge was previously a guarantor of this loan and
as partial consideration for Woodbridge becoming the obligor of
the Carolina Oak Loan, its membership interests in Levitt and
Sons, previously pledged by Woodbridge to the lender, was
released. At December 31, 2008, the outstanding balance on
the Carolina Oak Loan was $37.5 million. The loan is
collateralized by a first mortgage on the 150 acre parcel
in Tradition Hilton Head and guaranteed by Carolina Oak. The
Carolina Oak Loan is due and payable on March 21, 2011 but
may be extended for one additional year at the discretion of the
lender. Interest accrues under the facility at the Prime Rate
(3.25% at December 31, 2008) and is payable monthly.
The Carolina Oak Loan is subject to customary terms, conditions
and covenants, including periodic appraisal and re-margining and
the lenders right to accelerate the debt upon a material
adverse change with respect to Woodbridge. At December 31,
2008, there was no immediate availability to draw on this
facility based on available collateral, and we were in
compliance with the loan covenants.
At November 9, 2007, the date of the deconsolidation of
Levitt and Sons, Woodbridge had a negative investment in Levitt
and Sons of $123.0 million and there were outstanding
advances due to Woodbridge from Levitt and Sons of
$67.8 million, resulting in a net negative investment of
$55.2 million. During the fourth quarter of 2008, the
Company identified approximately $2.3 million of deferred
revenue on intercompany sales between Core and Carolina Oak that
had been misclassified against the negative investment in Levitt
and Sons. As a result, the Company recorded a $2.3 million
reclassification in the fourth quarter of 2008 between
292
inventory of real estate and the loss in excess of investment
in subsidiary in the consolidated statements of financial
condition. As a result, as of December 31, 2008, the net
negative investment was $52.9 million. After the filing of
the Levitt and Sons bankruptcy, Woodbridge incurred
certain administrative costs relating to services performed for
Levitt and Sons and its employees (the Post Petition
Services). Woodbridge did not incur Post Petition Services
in the three or six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to
approximately $591,000 and $1.6 million incurred in the
same periods in 2008, respectively.
On June 27, 2008, Woodbridge entered into a settlement
agreement (the Settlement Agreement) with the
Debtors and the Joint Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the
Joint Committee) appointed in the Chapter 11
Cases. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, among other things,
(i) Woodbridge agreed to pay to the Debtors
bankruptcy estates the sum of $12.5 million plus accrued
interest from May 22, 2008 through the date of payment,
(ii) Woodbridge agreed to waive and release substantially
all of the claims it had against the Debtors, including its
administrative expense claims through July 2008, and
(iii) the Debtors (joined by the Joint Committee) agreed to
waive and release any claims they had against Woodbridge and its
affiliates. After certain of Levitt and Sons creditors
indicated that they objected to the terms of the Settlement
Agreement and stated a desire to pursue claims against
Woodbridge, Woodbridge, the Debtors and the Joint Committee
entered into an amendment to the Settlement Agreement, pursuant
to which Woodbridge would, in lieu of the $12.5 million
payment previously agreed to, pay $8 million to the
Debtors bankruptcy estates and place $4.5 million in
a release fund to be disbursed to third party creditors in
exchange for a third party release and injunction. The amendment
also provided for an additional $300,000 payment by Woodbridge
to a deposit holders fund. The Settlement Agreement, as amended,
was subject to a number of conditions, including the approval of
the Bankruptcy Court. On February 20, 2009, the Bankruptcy
Court entered an order confirming a plan of liquidation jointly
proposed by Levitt and Sons and the Joint Committee. That order
also approved the settlement pursuant to the Settlement
Agreement, as amended. No appeal or rehearing of the Bankruptcy
Courts order was timely filed by any party, and the
settlement was consummated on March 3, 2009, at which time
payment was made in accordance with the terms and conditions of
the Settlement Agreement, as amended. Under cost method
accounting, the cost of settlement and the related
$52.9 million liability (less $500,000 which was determined
as the settlement holdback and remained as an accrual pursuant
to the Settlement Agreement, as amended) was recognized into
income in the six months ended June 30, 2009, resulting in
a $40.4 million gain on settlement of investment in
subsidiary.
We effected a
one-for-five
reverse stock split during the third quarter of 2008 which
converted each five shares of our Class A Common Stock into
one share of Class A Common Stock and each five shares of
our Class B Common Stock into one share of Class B
Common Stock. The reverse stock split proportionately reduced
the number of authorized shares and the number of outstanding
shares of our Class A Common Stock and Class B Common
Stock, but did not have any impact on our shareholders
proportionate equity interests or voting rights in the Company.
We pursued the reverse stock split based on the continued
listing requirements of the New York Stock Exchange. While the
reverse stock split was effected for the purpose of addressing
issues with respect to the trading price of our Class A
Common Stock and our compliance with the New York Stock
Exchanges continued listing requirements, our Class A
Common Stock ultimately failed to meet the New York Stock
Exchanges continued listing requirement regarding average
market capitalization over a consecutive
thirty-day
trading period. As a result, our Class A Common Stock was
suspended from trading on the New York Stock Exchange beginning
with the opening of trading on November 20, 2008. Our
Class A Common Stock currently trades on the Pink Sheets
under the ticker symbol WDGH.PK.
Core
Communities
At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, Core had cash
and cash equivalents of $10.2 million and
$16.9 million, respectively. Cash decreased
$6.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009
primarily as a result of cash used to fund the continued
development of Cores projects as well as selling, general
and administrative expenses. At June 30, 2009, Core had no
immediate availability under its various lines of credit. Core
has made efforts to minimize its development expenditures in
both Tradition, Florida and in Tradition Hilton Head; however,
Core continues to incur expenses related to the development of
these communities.
293
At December 31, 2007, Core had cash and cash equivalents of
$33.1 million. Cash decreased $16.2 million during the
year ended December 31, 2008 primarily as a result of a
$30.0 million dividend payment to the Parent Company, an
increase in restricted cash of $2.7 million mainly related
to the funding of an interest reserve, $19.9 million of
curtailment payments mentioned below and cash used to fund the
continued development at Cores projects as well as
selling, general and administrative expenses. These decreases
were partially offset by Cores receipt of
$40.0 million from the Parent Company as a repayment of an
intercompany loan. At December 31, 2008, Core had no
immediate availability under its various lines of credit.
Cores loan agreements generally require repayment of
specified amounts upon a sale of a portion of the property
collateralizing the debt. The loans which provide the primary
financing for Tradition, Florida and Tradition Hilton Head have
annual appraisal and re-margining requirements. These provisions
may require Core, in circumstances where the value of the real
estate collateralizing these loans declines, to pay down a
portion of the principal amount of the loan to bring the loan
within specified minimum
loan-to-value
ratios. Accordingly, should land prices decline, reappraisals
could result in significant future re-margining payments.
Additionally, the loans which provide the primary financing for
the commercial leasing projects contain certain debt service
coverage ratio covenants. If net operating income from these
projects falls below levels necessary to maintain compliance
with these covenants, Core would be required to make principal
curtailment payments sufficient to reduce the loan balance to an
amount which would bring Core into compliance with the
requirement, and these curtailment payments could be significant.
In January of 2009, Core was advised by one of its lenders that
it had received an external appraisal on the land that serves as
collateral for a development mortgage note payable, which had an
outstanding balance of $86.4 million at June 30, 2009.
The appraised value would suggest the potential for a
re-margining payment to bring the note payable back in line with
the minimum
loan-to-value
requirement. The lender is conducting its internal review
procedures, including the determination of the appraised value.
As of the date of this filing, Core is in discussions with the
lender to restructure the loan which may eliminate any
re-margining requirements; however, there is no assurance that
these discussions will be successful or that re-margining
payments will not otherwise be required in the future.
Core has a credit agreement with a financial institution which
provides for borrowings of up to $64.3 million. The credit
agreement had an original maturity date of June 26, 2009
and a variable interest rate of 30-day LIBOR plus 170 basis
points or Prime Rate. During June 2009, the loan agreement was
modified to extend the maturity date to June 2012. The loan, as
modified, bears interest at a fixed interest rate of 5.5%. The
terms of the modification also required Core to pledge
approximately 10 acres of additional collateral. The new
terms of the loan also include a debt service coverage ratio
covenant of 1.10:1 and the elimination of a loan to value
covenant. As of June 30, 2009, the loan had an outstanding
balance of $58.3 million.
Certain of Cores debt facilities contain financial
covenants generally requiring certain net worth, liquidity and
loan to value ratios. Further, certain of Cores debt
facilities contain cross-default provisions under which a
default on one loan with a lender could cause a default on other
debt instruments with the same lender. If Core fails to comply
with any of these restrictions or covenants, the lenders under
the applicable debt facilities could cause Cores debt to
become due and payable prior to maturity. These accelerations or
significant re-margining payments could require Core to dedicate
a substantial portion of its cash to pay its debt and reduce its
ability to use its cash to fund its operations. If Core does not
have sufficient cash to satisfy these required payments, then
Core would need to seek to refinance the debt or obtain
alternative funds, which may not be available on attractive
terms, if at all. In the event that Core is unable to refinance
its debt or obtain additional funds, it may default on some or
all of its existing debt facilities.
Cores operations have been negatively impacted by the
downturn in the residential and commercial real-estate
industries. Market conditions have adversely affected
Cores commercial leasing projects and its ability to
complete sales of its real estate inventory and, as a
consequence, Core is experiencing cash flow deficits. Possible
liquidity sources available to Core include the sale of real
estate inventory, including commercial properties, as well as
debt and outside equity financing, including secured borrowings
using unencumbered land; however, there is no assurance that any
or all of these alternatives will be available to Core on
attractive
294
terms, if at all, or that Core will otherwise be in a position
to utilize such alternatives to improve its cash position. In
addition, while funding from Woodbridge is a possible source of
liquidity, Woodbridge is generally under no contractual
obligation to provide funding to Core and there is no assurance
that it will do so.
Off
Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations
In connection with the development of certain of Cores
projects, community development, special assessment or
improvement districts have been established and may utilize
tax-exempt bond financing to fund construction or acquisition of
certain
on-site and
off-site infrastructure improvements near or at these
communities. If these improvement districts were not
established, Core would need to fund community infrastructure
development out of operating cash flow or through sources of
financing or capital, or be forced to delay its development
activity. The obligation to pay principal and interest on the
bonds issued by the districts is assigned to each parcel within
the district, and a priority assessment lien may be placed on
benefited parcels to provide security for the debt service. The
bonds, including interest and redemption premiums, if any, and
the associated priority lien on the property are typically
payable, secured and satisfied by revenues, fees, or assessments
levied on the property benefited. Core pays a portion of the
revenues, fees, and assessments levied by the districts on the
properties it still owns that are benefited by the improvements.
Core may also be required to pay down a specified portion of the
bonds at the time each unit or parcel is sold. The costs of
these obligations are capitalized to inventory during the
development period and recognized as cost of sales when the
properties are sold.
Cores bond financing at June 30, 2009,
December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 consisted of
district bonds totaling $218.7 million at each of these
dates with outstanding amounts of approximately
$143.6 million, $130.5 million and $82.9 million,
respectively. Further, at June 30, 2009, approximately
$68.4 million was available under these bonds to fund
future development expenditures, while at December 31, 2008
and 2007, there was approximately $82.4 million and
$129.5 million, respectively, available. Bond obligations
at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 mature in 2035
and 2040. As of each of June 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008, Core owned approximately 16% of the property subject to
assessments within the community development district and
approximately 91% of the property subject to assessments within
the special assessment district. During the three months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, Core recorded approximately
$158,000 and $163,000, respectively, in assessments on property
owned by it in the districts. During the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, Core recorded approximately
$317,000 and $268,000, respectively, in assessments on property
owned by it in the districts. During the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, Core recorded
approximately $584,000, $1.3 million and $1.7 million,
respectively, in assessments on property owned by it in the
districts. Core is responsible for any assessed amounts until
the underlying property is sold and will continue to be
responsible for the annual assessments if the property is never
sold. In addition, Core has guaranteed payments for assessments
under the district bonds in Tradition, Florida which would
require funding if future assessments to be allocated to
property owners are insufficient to repay the bonds. Management
has evaluated this exposure based upon the criteria in Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencies, and has
determined that there have been no substantive changes to the
projected density or land use in the development subject to the
bond which would make it probable that Core would have to fund
future shortfalls in assessments.
In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue
No. 91-10,
Accounting for Special Assessments and Tax Increment
Financing, the Company records a liability for the
estimated developer obligations that are fixed and determinable
and user fees that are required to be paid or transferred at the
time the parcel or unit is sold to an end user. At each of
June 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and December 31,
2007, the liability related to developer obligations associated
with Cores ownership of the property was
$3.3 million. This liability is included in the
accompanying unaudited consolidated statements of financial
condition as of June 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007.
We entered into an indemnity agreement in April 2004 with a
joint venture partner at Altman Longleaf relating to, among
other obligations, that partners guarantee of the joint
ventures indebtedness. Our liability under the indemnity
agreement was limited to the amount of any distributions from
the joint venture which exceeds our original capital and other
contributions. Levitt Commercial owned a 20% interest in Altman
295
Longleaf, LLC, which owned a 20% interest in this joint venture.
This joint venture developed a
298-unit
apartment complex in Melbourne, Florida. An affiliate of our
joint venture partner was the general contractor. Construction
commenced on the development in 2004 and was completed in 2006.
Our original capital contributions totaled approximately
$585,000 and we have received approximately $1.2 million in
distributions since 2004. In December 2008, our interest in the
joint venture was sold and we received approximately $182,000 as
a result of the sale. Accordingly, we were released from any
potential obligation of indemnity which may have arisen in
connection with the joint venture.
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of
June 30, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
2 - 3
|
|
|
4 - 5
|
|
|
More than
|
|
Category
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
Long-term debt obligations(1)(2)
|
|
$
|
348,516
|
|
|
|
8,308
|
|
|
|
207,942
|
|
|
|
11,222
|
|
|
|
121,044
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
2,039
|
|
|
|
1,030
|
|
|
|
718
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total obligations
|
|
$
|
350,555
|
|
|
|
9,338
|
|
|
|
208,660
|
|
|
|
11,513
|
|
|
|
121,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts exclude interest because terms of repayment are based on
construction activity and sales volume. In addition, a large
portion of the debt is based on variable rates. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
These amounts represent scheduled principal payments. Some of
those borrowings require the repayment of specified amounts upon
a sale of portions of the property collateralizing those
obligations, as well as curtailment repayments prior to
scheduled maturity pursuant to re-margining requirements. |
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of
December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
13-36
|
|
|
37-60
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
Category(1)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
12 Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
60 Months
|
|
|
Long-term debt obligations(2)
|
|
$
|
349,952
|
|
|
|
3,567
|
|
|
|
197,233
|
|
|
|
27,574
|
|
|
|
121,578
|
|
Interest payable on long-term debt
|
|
|
244,269
|
|
|
|
18,140
|
|
|
|
31,476
|
|
|
|
18,855
|
|
|
|
175,798
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
3,797
|
|
|
|
1,279
|
|
|
|
1,062
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
1,070
|
|
Severance related termination obligations
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent contractor agreements
|
|
|
681
|
|
|
|
681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total obligations
|
|
$
|
598,828
|
|
|
|
23,796
|
|
|
|
229,771
|
|
|
|
46,815
|
|
|
|
298,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Long-term debt obligations consist of notes, mortgage notes and
bonds payable and junior subordinated debentures. Interest
payable on these long-term debt obligations is the interest that
will be incurred related to the outstanding debt. Operating
lease obligations consist of lease commitments. The timing of
contractual payments for debt obligations assumes the exercise
of all extensions available at our sole discretion. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
In addition to the above scheduled payments, Cores
borrowing agreements generally require repayment of specified
amounts upon a sale of a portion of the property collateralizing
the debt or upon a reappraisal of the underlying collateral if
declines in value cause the loan to exceed maximum loan to value
ratios. In addition, Core is subject to provisions in its
borrowing agreements that require additional principal payments,
known as curtailment payments, in the event that sales are below
those agreed to at the inception of the borrowing. Total
curtailment payments during 2008 amounted to $19.9 million,
consisting of a $14.9 million curtailment payment which was
paid in January 2008 and an additional $5 million
curtailment payment which was paid in June 2008. Additionally,
certain borrowings may require increased principal payments on
our debt obligations due to re-margining requirements. |
In addition to the above contractual obligations, we have
$2.4 million in unrecognized tax benefits related to FASB
Interpretation No. 48 Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of
FASB No. 109 (FIN No. 48).
FIN No. 48 provides guidance for how a company should
recognize, measure,
296
present and disclose in its financial statements uncertain tax
positions that a company has taken or expects to take on a tax
return.
Tradition Development Company, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Core Communities (TDC), has an existing advertising
agreement with the operator of a Major League Baseball team
pursuant to which, among other advertising rights, TDC obtained
a royalty-free license to use, among others, the trademark
Tradition Field at the sports complex located in
Port St. Lucie and the naming rights to that complex. The
initial term of the agreement terminates on December 31,
2013; provided, however, that upon payment of a specified
buy-out fee and compliance with other contractual procedures,
TDC has the right to terminate the agreement at any time.
Required cumulative payments under the agreement through
December 31, 2013 are approximately $923,000 and are
included under Operating lease obligations in the
table above.
We have future obligations relating to the termination of
facilities associated with property and equipment leases that we
had entered into that were no longer providing a benefit to us,
as well as termination fees related to contractual obligations
we cancelled. As of December 31, 2008, these obligations
amounted to $640,000 and are included under Operating
lease obligations in the table above.
At June 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, we had outstanding surety bonds of
approximately $5.4 million, $8.2 million and
$7.1 million, respectively, which were related primarily to
obligations to various governmental entities to construct
improvements in various communities. We estimate that
approximately $1.1 million of work remains to complete
these improvements and that further improvements to developments
not being pursued will not be required. Accordingly, we do not
believe that any material amounts will likely be drawn on the
outstanding surety bonds.
In the ordinary course of business we sell land to third parties
where obligations exist to complete site development and
infrastructure improvements subsequent to the sale date. Future
development and construction obligations amount to
$5.2 million at December 31, 2008, which are expected
to be incurred over the next two years. The timing of future
development will depend on factors such as the timing of future
sales, demographic growth rates in the areas in which these
obligations occur and the impact of any future deterioration or
improvement in the local real estate market.
Levitt and Sons had approximately $33.3 million of surety
bonds outstanding related to its ongoing projects at the time of
the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases. In the event that these
obligations are drawn and paid by the surety, Woodbridge could
be responsible for up to $11.7 million plus costs and
expenses in accordance with the surety indemnity agreements
executed by Woodbridge. At June 30, 2009, December 31,
2008 and December 31, 2007, we had $1.1 million,
$1.1 million and $1.8 million, respectively, in surety
bonds accrual at Woodbridge related to certain bonds where
management believes it to be probable that Woodbridge will be
required to reimburse the surety under applicable indemnity
agreements. Woodbridge did not reimburse any amounts during the
three months ended June 30, 2009, while it reimbursed
approximately $367,000 during the three months ended
June 30, 2008 in accordance with the indemnity agreement
for bond claims paid during the period. For the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, Woodbridge reimbursed the surety
approximately $37,000 and $532,000, respectively. During the
year ended December 31, 2008, Woodbridge performed under
its indemnity agreements and reimbursed the surety $532,000
while no reimbursements were made in 2007. It is unclear whether
and to what extent the remaining outstanding surety bonds of
Levitt and Sons will be drawn and the extent to which Woodbridge
may be responsible for additional amounts beyond this accrual.
There is no assurance that Woodbridge will not be responsible
for amounts in excess of the $1.1 million accrual.
Woodbridge will not receive any repayment, assets or other
consideration as recovery of any amounts it may be required to
pay. In September 2008, a surety filed a lawsuit to require
Woodbridge to post $5.4 million of collateral against a
portion of the $11.7 million surety bonds exposure in
connection with demands made by a municipality. We believe that
the municipality does not have the right to demand payment under
the bonds and we initiated a lawsuit against the municipality.
We do not believe a loss is probable and accordingly have not
accrued any amount related to this claim. However, based on
claims made on the bonds, the surety requested that Woodbridge
post a $4.0 million letter of credit as security while the
matter is litigated with the municipality, and we have complied
with that request.
297
On November 9, 2007, Woodbridge put in place an employee
fund and offered up to $5 million of severance benefits to
terminated Levitt and Sons employees to supplement the limited
termination benefits paid by Levitt and Sons to those employees.
Levitt and Sons was restricted in the payment of termination
benefits to its former employees by virtue of the
Chapter 11 Cases. Woodbridge did not incur any significant
severance and benefits related restructuring charges in the
three months ended June 30, 2009, while, during the three
months ended June 30, 2008, Woodbridge incurred charges of
approximately $816,000. During the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, Woodbridge incurred severance and
benefits related restructuring charges of approximately $82,000
and $2.0 million, respectively. For the three months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, Woodbridge paid approximately
$79,000 and $1.2 million, respectively, in severance and
termination charges related to the above described employee fund
as well as severance for employees other than Levitt and Sons
employees, all of which are reflected in the Other Operations
segment. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
these charges amounted to approximately $211,000 and
$2.7 million, respectively. Employees entitled to
participate in the fund either received a payment stream, which
in certain cases extends over two years, or a lump sum payment,
dependent on a variety of factors. Former Levitt and Sons
employees who received these payments were required to assign to
Woodbridge their unsecured claims against Levitt and Sons.
The independent contractor related expense included in the table
relating to the year ended December 31, 2008 relates to two
contractor agreements entered into with former Levitt and Sons
employees. The agreements were for past and future consulting
services. The total commitment related to these agreements
included under Independent contractor agreements in
the table above was $681,000 as of December 31, 2008 and
will be paid monthly through 2009. The expense associated with
these arrangements is included in selling, general and
administrative expenses for the Other Operations segment for the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.
Impact of
Inflation
The financial statements and related financial data presented
herein have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, which require the measurement of
financial position and operating results in terms of historical
dollars without considering changes in the relative purchasing
power of money over time due to inflation.
Inflation could have a long-term impact on us because any
increase in the cost of land, materials and labor would result
in a need to increase the sales prices of land which may not be
possible. In addition, inflation is often accompanied by higher
interest rates which could have a negative impact on demand and
the costs of financing land development activities. Rising
interest rates as well as increased materials and labor costs
may reduce margins.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
See note 2 to our audited consolidated financial statements
and note 20 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements,
in each case included elsewhere in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus for a description of new accounting
pronouncements applicable to us.
298
BFC
SPECIAL MEETING PROPOSAL NO. 1 APPROVAL
OF
THE MERGER AND THE RELATED TRANSACTIONS
For a summary and detailed information regarding the proposal
relating to the merger and the related transactions, including
the amendment to BFCs Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of
BFCs Class A Common Stock from
100,000,000 shares to 150,000,000 shares, see the
information throughout this joint proxy statement/prospectus,
including the information set forth in Questions and
Answers About the Merger, Questions and Answers
About the BFC Special Meeting, Summary,
The BFC Special Meeting, The Merger and
The Merger Agreement.
THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS OF BFC HAS DETERMINED THAT THE MERGER AND THE RELATED
TRANSACTIONS ARE ADVISABLE, FAIR TO AND IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF
BFC AND ITS SHAREHOLDERS AND RECOMMENDS THAT BFCS
SHAREHOLDERS VOTE FOR THE MERGER AND THE RELATED
TRANSACTIONS.
WOODBRIDGE
ANNUAL MEETING PROPOSAL NO. 1 APPROVAL
OF
THE MERGER AGREEMENT
For a summary and detailed information regarding the proposal
relating to the merger agreement, see the information throughout
this joint proxy statement/prospectus, including the information
set forth in Questions and Answers About the Merger,
Questions and Answers About the Woodbridge Annual
Meeting, Summary, The Woodbridge Annual
Meeting, The Merger and The Merger
Agreement.
THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS OF WOODBRIDGE HAS DETERMINED THAT THE MERGER AGREEMENT
AND THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED THEREBY ARE ADVISABLE, FAIR TO
AND IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF WOODBRIDGES SHAREHOLDERS AND
RECOMMENDS THAT WOODBRIDGES SHAREHOLDERS VOTE
FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT.
WOODBRIDGE
ANNUAL MEETING PROPOSAL NO. 2 ELECTION OF
DIRECTORS
For a summary and detailed information regarding the proposal
relating to the election of directors to the board of directors
of Woodbridge, see the information set forth in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, including the information set forth in
Questions and Answers About the Woodbridge Annual
Meeting, The Woodbridge Annual Meeting and
Information About Woodbridge
Management Board of Directors.
THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS OF WOODBRIDGE RECOMMENDS THAT WOODBRIDGES
SHAREHOLDERS VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF EACH DIRECTOR
NOMINEE.
IMPORTANT
NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF
PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE WOODBRIDGE ANNUAL MEETING
This joint proxy statement/prospectus (including the information
contained herein which constitutes Woodbridges annual
report to shareholders for purposes of Rule 14a-3(b) of the
Exchange Act and the form of proxy card) are available at
www.proxydocs.com/wdgh.
LEGAL
MATTERS
The legality of the securities offered by this joint proxy
statement/prospectus will be passed upon for BFC by Stearns
Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson, P.A.,
Miami, Florida.
EXPERTS
The audited consolidated financial statements of BFC Financial
Corporation for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and
2008, except as they relate to Bluegreen Corporation, included
in this joint proxy statement/prospectus have been so included
in reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an
299
independent registered certified public accounting firm, given
on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and
accounting.
The audited consolidated financial statements of Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation for the years ended December 31, 2006,
2007 and 2008, except as they relate to Bluegreen Corporation,
included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus have been so
included in reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP, an independent registered certified public accounting firm,
given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and
accounting.
The consolidated financial statements of Bluegreen Corporation
at December 31, 2008 and 2007, and for each of the years
ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008, attached as
Exhibit 99.4 to the registration statement of which this
joint proxy statement/prospectus forms a part, have been audited
by Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public
accounting firm, as set forth in their report thereon appearing
as an exhibit herein, and are included in reliance upon such
report given on the authority of such firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
OTHER
MATTERS
No business, other than as described in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, will be transacted at the BFC special
meeting or the Woodbridge annual meeting, except such other
business as may properly be brought before the Woodbridge annual
meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof by the board
of directors of Woodbridge. As of the date of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus, the board of directors of Woodbridge does
not know of any other matter that will be presented for
consideration at the Woodbridge annual meeting, other than as
described in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. However, if
other matters are properly presented at such meeting or any
adjournment or postponement thereof, the persons named as
proxies with respect to the meeting will vote in accordance with
their best judgment on those matters.
INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP served as both BFCs and
Woodbridges independent registered certified public
accounting firm for each of the years ended December 31,
2008 and 2007. A representative of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP is
expected to be present at the BFC special meeting and the
Woodbridge annual meeting, will have the opportunity to make a
statement if he or she desires to do so, and will be available
to respond to appropriate questions from shareholders.
HOUSEHOLDING
OF PROXY MATERIAL
The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and
intermediaries such as brokers to satisfy delivery requirements
for proxy statements with respect to two or more shareholders
sharing the same address by delivering a single proxy statement
addressed to those shareholders. This process, which is commonly
referred to as householding, potentially provides
extra convenience for shareholders and cost savings for
companies. Each of BFC and Woodbridge as well as some brokers
household proxy materials, delivering a single proxy statement
to multiple shareholders sharing an address unless contrary
instructions have been received from the affected shareholders.
Once you have received notice from your broker or the
companies transfer agent, American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company (AST), that
they or the companies will be householding materials to your
address, householding will continue until you are notified
otherwise or until you revoke your consent. However, BFC or
Woodbridge, as applicable, will deliver promptly upon written or
oral request a separate copy of this joint proxy
statement/prospectus to a shareholder at a shared address to
which a single proxy statement was delivered. If, at any time,
you no longer wish to participate in householding and would
prefer to receive a separate proxy statement in the future, or
if you are receiving multiple proxy statements and would like to
request delivery of a single proxy statement in the future,
please notify your broker if your shares are held in a brokerage
account or AST if you hold registered shares. You can notify AST
by calling
800-937-5449
or by sending a written request to American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company, 59 Maiden
Lane Plaza Level, New York, NY 10038, Attn:
Marianela Patterson.
300
ADVANCE
NOTICE PROCEDURES
AND FUTURE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS
Woodbridges Advance Notice
Procedures. Under Woodbridges By-laws, no
business may be brought before annual meetings of
Woodbridges shareholders unless it is specified in the
notice of the meeting or is otherwise brought before the meeting
by or at the direction of the board of directors of Woodbridge
or, with respect to Woodbridges 2010 annual meeting of
shareholders (in the event the merger is not consummated and
Woodbridges separate corporate existence remains in effect
at that time) by a shareholder entitled to vote who has
delivered written notice to Woodbridges Secretary
(containing certain information specified in Woodbridges
By-laws about the shareholder and the proposed action) not
before May 24, 2010 and not after June 23, 2010. In addition,
any shareholder of Woodbridge who wishes to submit a nomination
to the board of directors of Woodbridge must deliver written
notice of the nomination within the aforementioned time period
and comply with the information requirements in
Woodbridges By-laws relating to shareholder nominations.
These requirements are separate from and in addition to the
SECs requirements that a shareholder must meet in order to
have a shareholder proposal included in the proxy materials for
any future annual meeting of Woodbridges shareholders.
Shareholder Proposals for Woodbridges 2010 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders. In the event that the
merger is not consummated and Woodbridges separate
corporate existence remains in effect and, therefore, Woodbridge
holds an annual meeting of its shareholders during 2010,
shareholders interested in submitting a proposal for inclusion
in the proxy materials for such meeting may do so by following
the procedures prescribed in SEC Rule
l4a-8. To be
eligible for inclusion, shareholder proposals must be received
by Woodbridges Secretary no later than April 19, 2010 at
Woodbridges main offices, 2100 West Cypress Creek
Road, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309.
BFCs Advance Notice Procedures and Shareholder
Proposals for BFCs 2010 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders. The requirements and deadlines
which shareholders of BFC must comply with in order to present
business before BFCs 2010 annual meeting of shareholders,
nominate an individual for election to the board of directors of
BFC at BFCs 2010 annual meeting of shareholders or submit
a proposal for inclusion in BFCs proxy materials for its
2010 annual meeting of shareholders are set forth in BFCs
Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed with the
SEC on April 29, 2009.
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
BFC and Woodbridge file annual, quarterly and current reports,
proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may
read and copy any reports, statements or other information that
BFC and Woodbridge file with the SEC at the SECs public
reference room at the following location:
Public Reference Room
100 F Street, N.E.
Room 1024
Washington, D.C. 20549
Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for further information on the public reference room. These SEC
filings are also available to the public from commercial
document retrieval services and at the website maintained by the
SEC at
http://www.sec.gov.
Additional information about the companies may be found at
http://www.bfcfinancial.com
and at
http://www.woodbridgeholdings.com.
Shareholders of BFC and Woodbridge can also contact the
information agent for the merger, Georgeson Inc., for answers to
their questions regarding the merger.
Georgeson Inc.
199 Water St., 26th Floor
New York, NY
10038-3650
Shareholders of BFC Call: 888-666-2593
Shareholders of Woodbridge Call: 877-255-0124
301
BFC has supplied all information contained in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus relating to BFC, and Woodbridge has
supplied all information contained in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus relating to Woodbridge.
You should rely only on the information contained in this joint
proxy statement/prospectus. BFC and Woodbridge have not
authorized anyone to provide you with information that is
different from what is contained in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus. You should assume that the information in
this joint proxy statement/prospectus is accurate only as of the
date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Neither the
mailing of this joint proxy statement/prospectus to shareholders
nor the issuance of shares of BFCs Class A Common
Stock in connection with the merger creates any implication to
the contrary.
302
BFCS
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The following unaudited financial statements of BFC for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 and
related notes have been excerpted from BFCs Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, filed with the SEC on
August 11, 2009, and the audited financial statements of
BFC for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
were filed as Exhibit 99.2 to BFCs Current Report on Form
8-K, filed with the SEC on July 20, 2009. Unless stated to
the contrary or the context otherwise requires, references to
we, us, our, the
Company and BFC within this section
refer to BFC Financial Corporation and its consolidated
subsidiaries.
Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Unaudited Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audited Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-49
|
|
|
|
|
F-51
|
|
|
|
|
F-53
|
|
|
|
|
F-55
|
|
|
|
|
F-56
|
|
|
|
|
F-57
|
|
|
|
|
F-61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bluegreen Corporation:
|
|
|
|
|
The financial statements of Bluegreen Corporation, which is
considered a significant investee, for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, including the Report of
Bluegreen Corporations Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm, Ernst & Young LLP, and for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are included as
exhibits to the registration statement of which this joint proxy
statement/prospectus forms a part.
F-1
BFC
Financial Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
271,873
|
|
|
|
278,937
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
7,845
|
|
|
|
21,288
|
|
Securities available for sale and other financial instruments
(at fair value)
|
|
|
459,171
|
|
|
|
722,698
|
|
Investment securities at cost or amortized cost (fair value:
$53,294 in 2009 and $12,475 in 2008)
|
|
|
52,315
|
|
|
|
12,008
|
|
Tax certificates, net of allowance of $7,036 in 2009 and $6,064
in 2008
|
|
|
179,110
|
|
|
|
213,534
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock, at cost which
approximates fair value
|
|
|
48,751
|
|
|
|
54,607
|
|
Residential loans held for sale
|
|
|
7,694
|
|
|
|
3,461
|
|
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses $172,220 in
2009 and $137,257 in 2008
|
|
|
4,021,067
|
|
|
|
4,314,184
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
35,370
|
|
|
|
41,817
|
|
Real estate held for development and sale
|
|
|
270,958
|
|
|
|
268,763
|
|
Real estate owned
|
|
|
34,317
|
|
|
|
19,045
|
|
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
40,583
|
|
|
|
41,386
|
|
Properties and equipment, net
|
|
|
304,291
|
|
|
|
315,347
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
35,363
|
|
|
|
44,986
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
44,289
|
|
|
|
43,521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
5,812,997
|
|
|
|
6,395,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits
|
|
$
|
3,252,601
|
|
|
|
3,178,105
|
|
Non-interest bearing deposits
|
|
|
802,446
|
|
|
|
741,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
4,055,047
|
|
|
|
3,919,796
|
|
Advances from FHLB
|
|
|
597,252
|
|
|
|
967,491
|
|
Federal funds purchased and other short term borrowings
|
|
|
5,553
|
|
|
|
238,339
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
19,515
|
|
|
|
41,387
|
|
Subordinated debentures, mortgage notes payable and
mortgage-backed bonds
|
|
|
286,245
|
|
|
|
287,772
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
383,325
|
|
|
|
376,104
|
|
Loss in excess of investment in Woodbridges subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,887
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
129,080
|
|
|
|
125,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
5,476,017
|
|
|
|
6,009,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock of $.01 par value; authorized
10,000,000 shares; Redeemable 5% Cumulative Preferred
Stock $.01 par value; authorized
15,000 shares; issued and outstanding 15,000 shares in
2009 and 2008 with a redemption value of $1,000 per share
|
|
|
11,029
|
|
|
|
11,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock of $.01 par value, authorized
100,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 38,275,112 in
2009 and 38,254,389 in 2008
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
Class B common stock of $.01 par value, authorized
20,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 6,854,381 in 2009
and 6,875,104 in 2008
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
124,728
|
|
|
|
123,562
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(32,050
|
)
|
|
|
(8,848
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
3,398
|
|
|
|
(2,298
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total BFC Financial Corporation (BFC)
shareholders equity
|
|
|
96,527
|
|
|
|
112,867
|
|
Noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
229,424
|
|
|
|
262,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
325,951
|
|
|
|
375,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
5,812,997
|
|
|
|
6,395,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
F-2
BFC
Financial Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
For the Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BFC Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
$
|
256
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
755
|
|
Securities activities, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
1,646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
952
|
|
|
|
2,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
|
57,479
|
|
|
|
78,487
|
|
|
|
120,387
|
|
|
|
162,219
|
|
Service charges on deposits
|
|
|
19,347
|
|
|
|
24,466
|
|
|
|
38,032
|
|
|
|
48,480
|
|
Other service charges and fees
|
|
|
8,059
|
|
|
|
7,121
|
|
|
|
15,084
|
|
|
|
14,554
|
|
Securities activities, net
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
8,965
|
|
|
|
5,132
|
|
|
|
4,227
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
3,279
|
|
|
|
2,931
|
|
|
|
5,929
|
|
|
|
5,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,856
|
|
|
|
121,970
|
|
|
|
184,564
|
|
|
|
235,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Development:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of real estate
|
|
|
1,767
|
|
|
|
2,395
|
|
|
|
3,194
|
|
|
|
2,549
|
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
2,071
|
|
Securities activities, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,178
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
3,157
|
|
|
|
2,891
|
|
|
|
6,347
|
|
|
|
5,981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,081
|
|
|
|
7,080
|
|
|
|
9,945
|
|
|
|
11,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
94,467
|
|
|
|
129,881
|
|
|
|
195,461
|
|
|
|
249,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BFC Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee compensation and benefits
|
|
|
2,117
|
|
|
|
2,344
|
|
|
|
4,313
|
|
|
|
5,504
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
737
|
|
|
|
851
|
|
|
|
1,438
|
|
|
|
1,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,854
|
|
|
|
3,195
|
|
|
|
5,751
|
|
|
|
7,282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
20,814
|
|
|
|
32,875
|
|
|
|
45,573
|
|
|
|
73,950
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
43,494
|
|
|
|
47,247
|
|
|
|
87,771
|
|
|
|
90,135
|
|
Employee compensation and benefits
|
|
|
25,935
|
|
|
|
33,181
|
|
|
|
54,741
|
|
|
|
68,336
|
|
Occupancy and equipment
|
|
|
14,842
|
|
|
|
16,172
|
|
|
|
29,753
|
|
|
|
32,558
|
|
Advertising and promotion
|
|
|
1,979
|
|
|
|
3,662
|
|
|
|
4,811
|
|
|
|
8,557
|
|
Restructuring charges and exit activities
|
|
|
1,406
|
|
|
|
5,762
|
|
|
|
3,281
|
|
|
|
5,597
|
|
Cost associated with debt redemption
|
|
|
1,441
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2,032
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Provision for tax certificates losses
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
924
|
|
|
|
2,900
|
|
|
|
807
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,541
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of real estate owned
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
FDIC special assessment
|
|
|
2,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
12,737
|
|
|
|
13,416
|
|
|
|
26,039
|
|
|
|
26,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,901
|
|
|
|
153,430
|
|
|
|
268,493
|
|
|
|
307,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Development:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales of real estate
|
|
|
1,301
|
|
|
|
1,760
|
|
|
|
1,994
|
|
|
|
1,848
|
|
Interest expense, net of interest capitalized
|
|
|
3,747
|
|
|
|
2,478
|
|
|
|
6,520
|
|
|
|
5,389
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
9,945
|
|
|
|
12,530
|
|
|
|
20,284
|
|
|
|
24,981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,993
|
|
|
|
16,768
|
|
|
|
28,798
|
|
|
|
32,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
144,748
|
|
|
|
173,393
|
|
|
|
303,042
|
|
|
|
346,662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
10,755
|
|
|
|
1,443
|
|
|
|
17,250
|
|
|
|
3,246
|
|
Impairment of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,401
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,396
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on settlement of investment in Woodbridges subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(39,526
|
)
|
|
|
(42,069
|
)
|
|
|
(72,759
|
)
|
|
|
(94,120
|
)
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,326
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,279
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(39,526
|
)
|
|
|
(26,743
|
)
|
|
|
(72,759
|
)
|
|
|
(59,841
|
)
|
Discontinued operations, less income tax provision of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0 and $705 for 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,201
|
|
|
|
1,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(39,526
|
)
|
|
|
(26,743
|
)
|
|
|
(68,558
|
)
|
|
|
(58,822
|
)
|
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
26,617
|
|
|
|
21,826
|
|
|
|
45,246
|
|
|
|
48,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to BFC
|
|
|
(12,909
|
)
|
|
|
(4,917
|
)
|
|
|
(23,312
|
)
|
|
|
(10,788
|
)
|
5% Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss allocable to common stock
|
|
$
|
(13,096
|
)
|
|
|
(5,104
|
)
|
|
|
(23,687
|
)
|
|
|
(11,163
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted (Loss) Earnings Per Common Share
Attributable to BFC (Note 20):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (Loss) Earnings Per Common Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
(0.55
|
)
|
|
|
(0.25
|
)
|
Earnings per share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share
|
|
$
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
(0.52
|
)
|
|
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (Loss) Earnings Per Common Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
(0.55
|
)
|
|
|
(0.25
|
)
|
Earnings per share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share
|
|
$
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
(0.52
|
)
|
|
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
45,126
|
|
|
|
45,112
|
|
|
|
45,120
|
|
|
|
45,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of common and common equivalent
shares outstanding
|
|
|
45,126
|
|
|
|
45,112
|
|
|
|
45,120
|
|
|
|
45,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
F-3
BFC
Financial Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
For the Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(39,526
|
)
|
|
|
(26,743
|
)
|
|
|
(68,558
|
)
|
|
|
(58,822
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale
|
|
|
6,705
|
|
|
|
(6,284
|
)
|
|
|
13,721
|
|
|
|
(12,025
|
)
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,935
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,149
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,705
|
|
|
|
(3,349
|
)
|
|
|
13,721
|
|
|
|
(6,876
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) associated with investment in
unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
(799
|
)
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
(1,226
|
)
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(247
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(412
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
(814
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-rata share of cumulative impact of accounting changes
recognized by Bluegreen Corporation on retained interests in
notes receivable sold
|
|
|
(1,251
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,251
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,251
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,251
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustments of realized net gains included in
net loss
|
|
|
(693
|
)
|
|
|
(6,010
|
)
|
|
|
(2,737
|
)
|
|
|
(3,974
|
)
|
Less: Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,029
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,243
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(693
|
)
|
|
|
(3,981
|
)
|
|
|
(2,737
|
)
|
|
|
(2,731
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
4,893
|
|
|
|
(7,882
|
)
|
|
|
10,338
|
|
|
|
(10,421
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(34,633
|
)
|
|
|
(34,625
|
)
|
|
|
(58,220
|
)
|
|
|
(69,243
|
)
|
Less: Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
25,864
|
|
|
|
28,634
|
|
|
|
40,604
|
|
|
|
56,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss attributable to BFC
|
|
$
|
(8,769
|
)
|
|
|
(5,991
|
)
|
|
|
(17,616
|
)
|
|
|
(12,439
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
F-4
BFC
Financial Corporation
For the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of Common
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
BFC
|
|
|
Controlling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Outstanding
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
Interests in
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
(Loss) Income
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
38,254
|
|
|
|
6,875
|
|
|
$
|
382
|
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
123,562
|
|
|
$
|
(8,848
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,298
|
)
|
|
$
|
112,867
|
|
|
$
|
262,554
|
|
|
$
|
375,421
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,312
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,312
|
)
|
|
|
(45,246
|
)
|
|
|
(68,558
|
)
|
Transfer of common stock
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro rata share of the cumulative effect of accounting changes
recognized by Bluegreen on retained interests in notes
receivable sold(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
1,575
|
|
|
|
2,060
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,696
|
|
|
|
5,696
|
|
|
|
4,642
|
|
|
|
10,338
|
|
Noncontrolling interests net effect of subsidiaries
capital transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,899
|
|
|
|
5,899
|
|
Net effect of subsidiaries capital transactions
attributable to BFC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
732
|
|
Cash dividends on the 5% Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
Share-based compensation related to stock options and restricted
stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2009
|
|
|
38,275
|
|
|
|
6,854
|
|
|
$
|
382
|
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
124,728
|
|
|
$
|
(32,050
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,398
|
|
|
$
|
96,527
|
|
|
$
|
229,424
|
|
|
$
|
325,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Accumulated deficit at January 1, 2009 was decrease by
approximately $485,000 representing the Companys pro rata
share of the after tax non-credit portion of other-than
temporary impairment losses recognized by Bluegreen Corporation
(Bluegreen) upon its adoption of FSP
FAS 115-2.
These other-than temporary losses which were previously
recognized in earnings have been reclassified to accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss). |
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
F-5
BFC
Financial Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
11,017
|
|
|
|
(21,004
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from redemption and maturities of investment securities
and tax certificates
|
|
|
98,569
|
|
|
|
82,519
|
|
Purchase of investment securities and tax certificates
|
|
|
(107,816
|
)
|
|
|
(311,011
|
)
|
Purchase of securities available for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(288,231
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale
|
|
|
205,679
|
|
|
|
365,490
|
|
Proceeds from maturities of securities available for sale
|
|
|
80,047
|
|
|
|
99,473
|
|
Decrease in restricted cash
|
|
|
13,443
|
|
|
|
1,478
|
|
Cash paid in settlement of Woodbridges subsidiary
bankruptcy
|
|
|
(12,430
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of FHLB stock
|
|
|
(2,295
|
)
|
|
|
(31,140
|
)
|
Redemption of FHLB stock
|
|
|
8,151
|
|
|
|
19,486
|
|
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(630
|
)
|
|
|
139
|
|
Distributions from unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
2,021
|
|
Net decrease (increase) in loans
|
|
|
185,352
|
|
|
|
(20,787
|
)
|
Proceeds from the sale of loans receivable
|
|
|
5,427
|
|
|
|
10,100
|
|
Adjustment to acquisition of Pizza Fusion
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improvements to real estate owned
|
|
|
(577
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of real estate owned
|
|
|
1,372
|
|
|
|
1,054
|
|
Net additions to office properties and equipment
|
|
|
(1,928
|
)
|
|
|
(5,669
|
)
|
Net cash outflows from the sale of Central Florida branches
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,491
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
475,762
|
|
|
|
(79,588
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in deposits
|
|
|
135,251
|
|
|
|
(49,628
|
)
|
Prepayments of FHLB advances
|
|
|
(526,032
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds (repayments) of FHLB advances
|
|
|
154,000
|
|
|
|
260,000
|
|
Decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
(21,872
|
)
|
|
|
1,994
|
|
Decrease in federal funds purchased
|
|
|
(232,786
|
)
|
|
|
(33,975
|
)
|
Repayment of notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
(1,656
|
)
|
|
|
(23,075
|
)
|
Proceeds from notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
7,283
|
|
Preferred stock dividends paid
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of BankAtlantic Bancorp Class A
common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
Purchase and retirement of Woodbridge Class A common stock
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic Bancorp cash dividends paid to non-BFC shareholders
|
|
|
(198
|
)
|
|
|
(432
|
)
|
Venture partnership distribution paid to non-BFC interest holder
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(410
|
)
|
Payment of Woodbridge debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(294
|
)
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(493,843
|
)
|
|
|
161,362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(7,064
|
)
|
|
|
60,770
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period
|
|
|
278,937
|
|
|
|
332,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
271,873
|
|
|
|
392,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid on borrowings and deposits
|
|
$
|
54,641
|
|
|
|
83,340
|
|
Supplementary disclosure of non-cash investing and financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and tax certificates transferred to REO
|
|
|
16,403
|
|
|
|
4,266
|
|
Increase (decrease) in BFC accumulated other comprehensive
income, net of taxes
|
|
|
5,696
|
|
|
|
(1,651
|
)
|
Net increase in equity from the effect of subsidiaries
capital transactions to BFC, net of income taxes
|
|
|
732
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
Net increase in shareholders equity resulting from the
cumulative impact of accounting changes recognized by Bluegreen
on retained interests in notes receivable sold
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
F-6
BFC
Financial Corporation
|
|
1.
|
Presentation
of Interim Financial Statements
|
BFC Financial Corporation (BFC or the
Company) is a diversified holding company whose
major holdings include controlling interests in BankAtlantic
Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries
(BankAtlantic Bancorp) and Woodbridge Holdings
Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries
(Woodbridge) and a noncontrolling interest in
Benihana, Inc. (Benihana), which operates
Asian-themed restaurant chains in the United States. As a result
of the Companys position as the controlling shareholder of
BankAtlantic Bancorp, BFC is a unitary savings bank
holding company regulated by the Office of Thrift
Supervision (OTS).
On July 2, 2009, the Company entered into a definitive
merger agreement with Woodbridge. Subject to the terms and
conditions of the agreement, Woodbridge will become a
wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC and Woodbridges
shareholders (other than BFC) will become shareholders of BFC.
See the other information contained in this joint proxy
statement/prospectus regarding the proposed merger with
Woodbridge as well as Note 25 below for further information
regarding the merger agreement and the proposed merger.
As a holding company with controlling positions in BankAtlantic
Bancorp and Woodbridge, BFC is required under generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) to consolidate the
financial results of these companies. As a consequence, the
financial information of both entities is presented on a
consolidated basis in BFCs financial statements. However,
except as otherwise noted, the debts and obligations of
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge are not direct obligations
of BFC and are non-recourse to BFC. Similarly, the assets of
those entities are not available to BFC absent its pro rata
share in a dividend or distribution.
BFCs ownership in BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge as
of June 30, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Vote
|
|
|
BankAtlantic Bancorp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock
|
|
|
2,389,697
|
|
|
|
23.28
|
%
|
|
|
12.34
|
%
|
Class B Common Stock
|
|
|
975,225
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
47.00
|
%
|
Total
|
|
|
3,364,922
|
|
|
|
29.94
|
%
|
|
|
59.34
|
%
|
Woodbridge Holdings Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock
|
|
|
3,735,392
|
|
|
|
22.45
|
%
|
|
|
11.90
|
%
|
Class B Common Stock
|
|
|
243,807
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
47.00
|
%
|
Total
|
|
|
3,979,199
|
|
|
|
23.57
|
%
|
|
|
58.90
|
%
|
BankAtlantic Bancorp is a unitary savings bank holding company
organized under the laws of the State of Florida. BankAtlantic
Bancorps principal asset is its investment in BankAtlantic
and its subsidiaries. BankAtlantic, is a federal savings bank
headquartered in Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
On February 28, 2007, BankAtlantic Bancorp completed the
sale to Stifel Financial Corp. (Stifel) of Ryan Beck
Holdings, Inc. (Ryan Beck), a subsidiary of
BankAtlantic Bancorp engaged in retail and institutional
brokerage and investment banking. Under the terms of the Ryan
Beck sales agreement, BankAtlantic Bancorp received additional
consideration based on Ryan Beck revenues over the two-year
period following the closing of the sale. Included in the
Companys consolidated statement of operations in
discontinued operations for the six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008 was $4.2 million and $1.1 million of
earn-out consideration, respectively.
Historically, Woodbridges operations were primarily within
the real estate industry; however, Woodbridges has pursued
investments and acquisitions within or outside of the real
estate industry, as well as the continued development of
master-planned communities. Woodbridge engages in business
activities through its Land Division, which currently consists
of the operations of Core Communities, LLC (Core
Communities or Core), which develops
master-planned communities, and through its Other Operations
segment
F-7
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(Woodbridge Other Operations), which currently
includes the other operations of Woodbridge, such as the
consolidated operations of Pizza Fusion Holdings, Inc.
(Pizza Fusion) which is a quick service organic
restaurant franchisor, the consolidated operations of Carolina
Oak Homes, LLC (Carolina Oak), which engaged in
homebuilding activities in South Carolina prior to the
suspension of those activities in the fourth quarter of 2008,
and the activities of Cypress Creek Capital Holdings, LLC
(Cypress Creek Capital) and Snapper Creek Equity
Management, LLC (Snapper Creek). An equity
investment in Bluegreen Corporation (Bluegreen), a
publicly-traded timeshare operator, and an investment in Office
Depot, Inc. (Office Depot), a publicly-traded office
supply company, are also included in the Woodbridge Other
Operations segment.
Prior to November 9, 2007, Woodbridge also conducted
homebuilding operations through Levitt and Sons, LLC
(Levitt and Sons), which comprised Woodbridges
Homebuilding Division. Woodbridges Homebuilding Division
consisted of two reportable operating segments, the Primary
Homebuilding segment and the Tennessee Homebuilding segment. As
previously reported, on November 9, 2007, Levitt and Sons
and substantially all of its subsidiaries (the
Debtors) filed voluntary petitions for relief under
Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code (the
Chapter 11 Cases) in the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida (the
Bankruptcy Court). In connection with the filing of
the Chapter 11 Cases, Woodbridge deconsolidated Levitt and
Sons as of November 9, 2007, eliminating all future
operations of Levitt and Sons from Woodbridges financial
results of operations. As a result of the deconsolidation of
Levitt and Sons, Woodbridge recorded its interest in Levitt and
Sons under the cost method of accounting.
As previously reported, on February 20, 2009, the
Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming a plan of
liquidation jointly proposed by Levitt and Sons and the Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors. That order also approved the
settlement pursuant to the settlement agreement that was entered
into on June 27, 2008. No appeal or rehearing of the
Bankruptcy Courts order was timely filed by any party, and
the settlement was consummated on March 3, 2009, at which
time, payment was made in accordance with the terms and
conditions of the settlement agreement. Under cost method
accounting, the cost of settlement and the related
$52.9 million liability (less $500,000 which was determined
as the settlement holdback and remained as an accrual pursuant
to the settlement agreement, was recognized into income in the
first quarter of 2009, resulting in a $40.4 million gain on
settlement of investment in subsidiary. See Note 24 for
further information regarding the bankruptcy of Levitt and Sons.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements
have been prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial
information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and disclosures required by GAAP for complete
financial statements. In managements opinion, the
accompanying consolidated financial statements contain such
adjustments as are necessary for a fair statement of the
Companys consolidated financial condition at June 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008; the consolidated results of
operations and comprehensive loss for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the consolidated cash flows
and the changes in consolidated equity for the six months ended
June 30, 2009. Operating results for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative
of the results that may be expected for the year ending
December 31, 2009. These consolidated financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the Companys audited
consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included
below. All significant inter-company balances and transactions
have been eliminated in consolidation.
Certain amounts for prior periods have been reclassified to
conform to the current periods presentation.
Revisions
and Reclassifications
On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted the change in
accounting for noncontrolling interests and, accordingly, the
Company reflected the new presentation of noncontrolling
interests as a separate item in the equity section in the
Companys Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
The Company also reflected the amount attributable to
noncontrolling interests and the amount attributable to BFC to
be separately presented in the Companys Consolidated
Statements of Operations, Consolidated Statements of
F-8
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Comprehensive Loss and Consolidated Statement of Changes in
Equity. The change in accounting for noncontrolling interests
was applied prospectively with the exception of the financial
statements presentation and required disclosures, which were
applied retrospectively for all periods presented.
In 2007, Core Communities began soliciting bids from several
potential buyers to purchase assets associated with two of
Cores commercial leasing projects (the
Projects). As the criteria for assets held for sale
had been met in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets (SFAS No. 144), the
assets were reclassified to assets held for sale and the
liabilities related to those assets were reclassified to
liabilities related to assets held for sale. The results of
operations for these assets were reclassified as discontinued
operations. During the fourth quarter of 2008, Woodbridge
determined that given the difficulty in predicting the timing or
probability of a sale of the assets associated with the Projects
as a result of, among other things, the economic downturn and
disruptions in the credit markets, the requirements of
SFAS No. 144 necessary to classify these assets as
held for sale and to be included in discontinued operations were
no longer met and Woodbridge could not assert the Projects could
be sold within a year. Therefore, the results of operations for
these Projects were reclassified back into continuing operations
for prior periods to conform to the current periods
presentation.
A revision was recorded by Woodbridge in the first quarter of
2009 to account for assets and non-controlling interests not
recorded properly in the initial application of purchase
accounting of Woodbridges investment in Pizza Fusion. The
adjustment, resulted in an increase in cash of
$3.0 million, goodwill of $1.1 million and
noncontrolling interest of $4.1 million. Woodbridge has
also recorded an increase in cash flows from investing
activities in the six months ended June 30, 2009 of
$3.0 million which is included in adjustment to acquisition
of Pizza Fusion in the accompanying unaudited consolidated
statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30,
2009. The impact of this revision is not material to our
consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2008, nor was it material to our consolidated
statement of cash flows for the periods then ended. The revision
had no impact on our net income or loss or on our cash flows
from operating activities for the three month periods ended
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008.
Recently
Adopted Accounting Standards
In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements An Amendment of ARB No. 51
(SFAS 160). SFAS 160 established new
accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling
interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. Specifically, this statement required the
recognition of a noncontrolling interest (minority interest) as
equity in the consolidated financial statements and separate
from the parents equity. SFAS 160 also established
accounting and reporting standards for the amount of
consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the
noncontrolling interest. SFAS 160 clarified that changes in
a parents ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not
result in deconsolidation are equity transactions if the parent
retains its controlling financial interest. In addition,
SFAS 160 required that a parent recognize a gain or loss in
net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. Such gain or
loss is measured using the fair value of the noncontrolling
equity investment on the deconsolidation date. SFAS 160
also included expanded disclosure requirements regarding the
interests of the parent and its noncontrolling interest.
SFAS 160 was effective for fiscal years, and interim
periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after
December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption was prohibited. The
Company adopted SFAS 160 on January 1, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141
(Revised 2007), Business Combinations
(SFAS 141(R)). SFAS 141(R)
significantly changed the accounting for business combinations.
Under SFAS 141(R), subject to limited exceptions, an
acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the
acquisition-date fair value. Additionally, due diligence
F-9
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
and transaction costs incurred to effect a business combination
will be expensed as incurred, as opposed to being capitalized as
part of the acquisition purchase price.
SFAS No. 141(R) also includes a substantial number of
new disclosure requirements. The adoption of
SFAS No. 141(R) on January 1, 2009 did not impact
the Companys unaudited consolidated financial statements,
but will impact the accounting for any future acquisitions.
In May 2009, the FASB issued FAS No. 165,
Subsequent Events (FAS 165).
FAS 165 addresses the accounting and disclosures of
subsequent events not addressed in other pronouncements. This
statement establishes new terminology for the Type I
and Type II concepts naming them
Recognized and Unrecognized subsequent
events, respectively. FAS 165 also requires the disclosure
of the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated
and whether the date is the date the financial statements were
issued or the date the financial statements were available to be
issued. The application of this pronouncement is effective for
fiscal years and interim periods beginning after June 15,
2009. The Company has adopted this pronouncement and has
evaluated subsequent events through the issuance date of the
financial statements on August 11, 2009.
In April 2009, the FASB issued three related FASB Staff
Positions (FSPs): (i) FSP
FAS 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of
Activity for the Asset or Liability have Significantly Decreased
and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly
(FSP
FAS 157-4),
(ii) FSP
FAS 115-2
and FSP
FAS 124-2,
Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments (FSP
FAS 115-2/FAS 124-2),
and (iii) FSP
FAS No. 107-1
and APB
28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments (FSP
FAS 107-1/APB
28-1),
each of which is effective for interim and annual periods ending
after June 15, 2009. FSP
FAS 157-4
provides guidance on how to determine the fair value of assets
and liabilities under SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements
(SFAS No. 157) in the current economic
environment and reemphasizes that the objective of a fair value
measurement remains an exit price. If the Company was to
conclude that there has been a significant decrease in the
volume and level of activity of the asset or liability in
relation to normal market activities, quoted market values may
not be representative of fair value and the Company may conclude
that a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple
valuation techniques may be appropriate. FSP
FAS 115-2/FAS 124-2
modifies the requirements for recognizing
other-than-temporarily
impaired debt securities and revises the existing impairment
model for such securities, by modifying the current intent and
ability indicator in determining whether a debt security is
other-than-temporarily
impaired. FSP
FAS 107-1/APB
28-1
enhances the disclosure of instruments under the scope of
SFAS No. 157 for both interim and annual periods. The
adoption of these FSPs did not have a material impact on the
Companys unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
BFC
Except as otherwise noted, the debts and obligations of
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge are not direct obligations
of BFC and are non-recourse to BFC. Similarly, the assets of
those entities are not available to BFC absent its pro rata
share in a dividend or distribution. BFC has incurred operating
cash flow deficits which have been financed with available
working capital. BFC expects to meet its liquidity requirements
generally through existing cash balances and cash dividends from
Benihana and, if necessary with respect to its long-term
liquidity requirements, through secured and unsecured
indebtedness, future issuances of equity
and/or debt
securities, and, the sale of assets; however, there is no
assurance that any of these alternatives will be available to
BFC on attractive terms, or at all, particularly if the adverse
current economic and financial market conditions continue.
F-10
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
BankAtlantic
Bancorp and BankAtlantic
BankAtlantics liquidity is dependent, in part, on its
ability to maintain or increase deposit levels and availability
under its lines of credit, and Treasury and Federal Reserve
lending programs. Additionally, interest rate changes,
additional collateral requirements, disruptions in the capital
markets or deterioration in BankAtlantics financial
condition may make terms of the borrowings and deposits less
favorable. As a result, there is a risk that BankAtlantics
cost of funds will increase or that the availability of funding
sources may decrease. As of June 30, 2009, BankAtlantic had
available unused borrowings and cash of approximately
$825 million consisting primarily of $247 million of
unused FHLB line of credit capacity, $246 million of
unpledged securities, $119 million of available borrowing
capacity at the Federal Reserve and $213 million of cash.
However, such available borrowings are subject to periodic
reviews and they may be terminated or limited at any time.
As of June 30, 2009, BankAtlantics capital was in
excess of all regulatory well capitalized levels.
However, the OTS, at its discretion, can at any time require an
institution to maintain capital amounts and ratios above the
established well capitalized requirements based on
its view of the risk profile of the specific institution. If
higher capital requirements are imposed, BankAtlantic could be
required to raise additional capital. There is no assurance that
additional capital will not be necessary, or that BankAtlantic
Bancorp or BankAtlantic would be successful in raising
additional capital in subsequent periods on favorable terms or
at all. BankAtlantic Bancorps inability to raise capital
or be deemed well capitalized could have a material
adverse impact on BFCs and BankAtlantic Bancorps
financial condition and results.
Core
Communities
Cores operations have been negatively impacted by the
downturn in the residential and commercial real-estate markets.
Market conditions have adversely affected Cores commercial
leasing projects and its ability to complete sales of its real
estate inventory and, as a consequence, Core is experiencing
cash flow deficits. Possible liquidity sources available to Core
include the sale of real estate inventory, including commercial
properties, as well as debt and outside equity financing,
including secured borrowings using unencumbered land; however,
there is no assurance that any or all of these alternatives will
be available to Core on attractive terms, if at all, or that
Core will otherwise be in a position to utilize such
alternatives to improve its cash position. In addition, while
funding from Woodbridge is a possible source of liquidity,
Woodbridge is generally under no contractual obligation to
provide funding to Core and there is no assurance that it will
do so.
Certain of Cores debt facilities contain financial
covenants generally requiring certain net worth, liquidity and
loan to value ratios. In January of 2009, Core was advised by
one of its lenders that the lender had received an external
appraisal on the land that serves as collateral for a
development mortgage note payable, which had an outstanding
balance of $86.4 million at June 30, 2009. The
appraised value would suggest the potential for a re-margining
payment to bring the note payable back in line with the minimum
loan-to-value
requirement. The lender is conducting its internal review
procedures, including the determination of the appraised value.
As of the date of this filing, Core is in discussion with the
lender to restructure the loan which may eliminate any
re-margining requirements; however, there is no assurance that
these discussions will be successful or that re-margining
payments will not otherwise be required in the future.
As discussed above, the operations of Core have been negatively
impacted by the deterioration of the real estate market and Core
may be required to make re-margining payments under certain of
its debt facilities. These factors have caused substantial doubt
to be raised regarding Cores ability to continue as a
going concern if Woodbridge chooses not to provide Core with the
cash needed to meet its obligations when and if they arise.
Cores results are reported separately for segment purposes
as the Land Division segment in Note 5. The financial
information provided in the Land Division segment and in the
unaudited consolidated financial statements has been prepared
assuming that Core will meet its obligations and continue as a
going concern. As
F-11
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
a result, the unaudited consolidated financial statements and
the financial information provided for the Land Division do not
include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of
this uncertainty.
|
|
3.
|
Fair
Value Measurement
|
The following table presents major categories of the
Companys assets measured at fair value on a recurring
basis at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2009 Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
June 30.
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Description
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Securities Available for Sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
293,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
REMICS(1)
|
|
|
137,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock
|
|
|
20,511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,511
|
|
Other equity securities(2)
|
|
|
7,678
|
|
|
|
7,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available for sale at fair value
|
|
$
|
459,171
|
|
|
|
7,468
|
|
|
|
430,732
|
|
|
|
20,971
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2008 Using:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Description
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Securities Available for Sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
532,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
532,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
REMICS
|
|
|
166,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock
|
|
|
16,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,426
|
|
Other equity securities(2)
|
|
|
6,798
|
|
|
|
5,210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available for sale at fair value
|
|
$
|
722,698
|
|
|
|
5,210
|
|
|
|
699,224
|
|
|
|
18,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
BankAtlantic invests in real estate mortgage investment conduits
(REMICs) that are guaranteed by the U.S. government
or its agencies. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Equity securities includes Woodbridges investment in
Office Depots common stock with an estimated fair value of
approximately $6.5 million and $4.3 million at
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
(See Note 9) |
There were no liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis in the Companys financial statements at
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
F-12
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table presents major categories of assets measured
at fair value on a recurring basis using significant
unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benihana
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Beginning Balance
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
|
|
16,384
|
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
17,886
|
|
Total gains and losses (realized/unrealized)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,378
|
)
|
|
|
(1,378
|
)
|
Included in other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,127
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
4,463
|
|
Purchases, issuances, and settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
|
|
20,511
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
20,971
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benihana
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Beginning Balance
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
|
|
16,426
|
|
|
|
1,588
|
|
|
|
18,264
|
|
Total gains and losses (realized/unrealized)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,378
|
)
|
|
|
(1,378
|
)
|
Included in other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,085
|
|
Purchases, issuances, and settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
|
|
20,511
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
20,971
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The loss of $1.4 million associated with equity securities
was included in Financial Services securities activities, net in
the Companys statements of operations for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2009 and which represents an
other-than-temporary
impairment associated with a decline in value related to an
equity investment in an unrelated financial institution.
The following table presents major categories of assets measured
at fair value on a recurring basis using significant
unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three months
ended June 30, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stifel
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Beginning Balance
|
|
$
|
481
|
|
|
|
8,805
|
|
|
|
4,348
|
|
|
|
13,634
|
|
Total gains and losses (realized/unrealized)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,452
|
|
Included in other comprehensive income
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(976
|
)
|
|
|
(975
|
)
|
Purchases, issuances, and settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance, June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
482
|
|
|
|
13,257
|
|
|
|
3,372
|
|
|
|
17,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The entire $4.5 million of gains included in earnings for
the three months ended June 30, 2008 represents changes in
unrealized gains relating to assets still held at June 30,
2008
F-13
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table presents major categories of assets measured
at fair value on a recurring basis using significant
unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stifel
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Beginning Balance
|
|
$
|
681
|
|
|
|
10,661
|
|
|
|
5,133
|
|
|
|
16,475
|
|
Total gains and losses (realized/unrealized)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,596
|
|
Included in other comprehensive income
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,761
|
)
|
|
|
(1,760
|
)
|
Purchases, issuances, and settlements
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(200
|
)
|
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance, June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
482
|
|
|
|
13,257
|
|
|
|
3,372
|
|
|
|
17,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The entire $2.6 million of gains included in earnings for
the six months ended June 30, 2008 represents changes in
unrealized gains relating to assets still held at June 30,
2008.
The valuation techniques and the inputs used in our financial
statements to measure the fair value of our recurring financial
instruments are described below.
Mortgage-Backed
Securities and REMICs
The fair values of mortgage-backed and real estate mortgage
conduit securities are estimated using independent pricing
sources and matrix pricing. Matrix pricing uses a market
approach valuation technique and Level 2 valuation inputs
as quoted market prices are not available for the specific
securities that BankAtlantic owns. The independent pricing
sources value these securities using observable market inputs
including: benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer
quotes, issuer spreads and other reference data in the secondary
institutional market which is the principal market for these
types of assets. To validate fair values obtained from the
pricing sources, BankAtlantic reviews fair value estimates
obtained from brokers, investment advisors and others to
determine the reasonableness of the fair values obtained from
independent pricing sources. BankAtlantic reviews any price that
it determines may not be reasonable and requires the pricing
sources to explain the differences in fair value or reevaluate
its fair value.
Bonds
and Other Equity Securities
Bonds and equity securities are generally fair valued using the
market approach and quoted market prices (Level 1) or
matrix pricing (Level 2 or Level 3) with inputs
obtained from independent pricing sources to value bonds and
equity securities, if available. Also non-binding broker quotes
are obtained to validate fair values obtained from matrix
pricing. However, for certain equity and debt securities in
which observable market inputs cannot be obtained, these
securities are valued either using the income approach and
pricing models that we have developed or based on observable
market data that we adjusted based on our judgment of the
factors we believe a market participant would use to value the
securities (Level 3).
Benihanas
Convertible Preferred Stock
The fair value of the Companys investment in
Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock was assessed using
the income approach with Level 3 inputs by discounting
future cash flows at a market discount rate combined with the
fair value of the underlying shares, as if converted, that BFC
owns in Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock.
F-14
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table presents major categories of assets measured
at fair value on a non-recurring basis (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical
|
|
|
Other Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Description
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Impairments
|
|
|
Loans measured for impairment using the fair value of the
collateral
|
|
$
|
177,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177,326
|
|
|
$
|
37,744
|
|
Impaired real estate owned
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
Impaired real estate held for sale
|
|
|
2,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,130
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Impaired goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,541
|
|
Investment in Bluegreen
|
|
|
23,984
|
|
|
|
23,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
206,395
|
|
|
|
23,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,411
|
|
|
$
|
67,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There was no material liabilities measured at fair value on a
non-recurring basis in the Companys financial statements.
Loans
Measured For Impairment
Impaired loans are generally valued based on the fair value of
the underlying collateral. Third party appraisals of the
collateral are primarily used to assist in measuring impairment.
These appraisals generally use the market or income approach
valuation technique and use market observable data to formulate
an opinion of the fair value of the loans collateral.
However, the appraiser uses professional judgment in determining
the fair value of the collateral and these values may also be
adjusted for changes in market conditions subsequent to the
appraisal date. When current appraisals are not available for
certain loans, judgment on market conditions is used to adjust
the most current appraisal. The comparable sales prices used in
the valuation of the collateral may reflect prices of sales
contracts not closed, and the amount of time required to sell
out the real estate project may be derived from current
appraisals of similar projects. As a consequence, the fair value
of the collateral is considered a Level 3 valuation.
Impaired
Real Estate Owned and Real Estate Held for
Sale
Generally, real estate is valued using third party appraisals or
broker price opinions. These appraisals generally use the market
approach valuation technique and use market observable data to
formulate an opinion of the fair value of the properties.
However, the appraiser or brokers use professional judgment in
determining the fair value of the properties, and we may also
adjust these values for changes in market conditions subsequent
to the valuation date. As a consequence of using broker price
opinions and adjustments to appraisals, the fair values of the
properties are considered a Level 3 valuation.
Impaired
Goodwill
Goodwill impairment charges relating to BankAtlantic
Bancorps tax certificates and investments reporting units
in the aggregate amount of $8.5 million, net of purchase
accounting adjustment from the 2008 step acquisition in the
amount of approximately $0.6 million, was recorded during
the six months ended June 30, 2009. The remaining goodwill
on the Companys statement of financial condition primarily
relates to BankAtlantic Bancorps capital services
reporting unit. The goodwill associated with this reporting unit
was determined not to be impaired as of June 30, 2009. In
determining the fair value of the reporting units, BankAtlantic
Bancorp used discounted cash flow valuation techniques. This
method requires assumptions for expected cash flows and
applicable discount rates. The aggregate fair value of all
reporting units derived from
F-15
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
the above valuation methodology was compared to BankAtlantic
Bancorps market capitalization adjusted for a control
premium in order to determine the reasonableness of the
financial model output. A control premium represents the value
an investor would pay above minority interest transaction prices
in order to obtain a controlling interest in the respective
company. BankAtlantic Bancorp used financial projections over a
period of time considered necessary to achieve a steady state of
cash flows for each reporting unit. The primary assumptions in
the projections were anticipated loan, tax certificates and
securities growth, interest rates and revenue growth. The
discount rates were estimated based on the Capital Asset Pricing
Model, which considers the risk-free interest rate, market risk
premium, beta, and unsystematic risk and size premium
adjustments specific to a particular reporting unit. The
estimated fair value of a reporting unit is highly sensitive to
changes in the discount rate and terminal value assumptions and,
accordingly, minor changes in these assumptions could impact
significantly the fair value assigned to a reporting unit.
Future potential changes in these assumptions may impact the
estimated fair value of a reporting unit and cause the fair
value of a reporting unit to be below its carrying value. As a
result of the significant judgments used in determining the fair
value of the reporting units, the fair values of the reporting
units are considered a Level 3 valuation.
Financial
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
271,873
|
|
|
|
271,873
|
|
|
|
278,937
|
|
|
|
278,937
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
7,845
|
|
|
|
7,845
|
|
|
|
21,288
|
|
|
|
21,288
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
459,171
|
|
|
|
459,171
|
|
|
|
722,698
|
|
|
|
722,698
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
52,315
|
|
|
|
53,294
|
|
|
|
12,008
|
|
|
|
12,475
|
|
Tax Certificates
|
|
|
179,110
|
|
|
|
185,483
|
|
|
|
213,534
|
|
|
|
224,434
|
|
Federal home loan bank stock
|
|
|
48,751
|
|
|
|
48,751
|
|
|
|
54,607
|
|
|
|
54,607
|
|
Loans receivable including loans held for sale, net
|
|
|
4,041,217
|
|
|
|
3,659,724
|
|
|
|
4,317,645
|
|
|
|
3,950,557
|
|
Financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
4,055,047
|
|
|
|
4,045,715
|
|
|
|
3,919,796
|
|
|
|
3,919,810
|
|
Short term borrowings
|
|
|
25,068
|
|
|
|
25,068
|
|
|
|
279,726
|
|
|
|
279,777
|
|
Advances from FHLB
|
|
|
597,252
|
|
|
|
605,809
|
|
|
|
967,491
|
|
|
|
983,582
|
|
Subordinated debentures, mortgage and notes payable
|
|
|
286,245
|
|
|
|
272,409
|
|
|
|
287,772
|
|
|
|
266,851
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
383,325
|
|
|
|
122,661
|
|
|
|
376,104
|
|
|
|
152,470
|
|
Management has made estimates of fair value that it believes to
be reasonable. However, because there is no active market for
many of these financial instruments and management has derived
the fair value of the majority of these financial instruments
using the income approach technique with Level 3
unobservable inputs, there is no assurance that the Company
would receive the estimated value upon sale or disposition of
the asset or pay estimated value upon disposition of the
liability in advance of its scheduled maturity. Management
estimates used in its net present value financial models rely on
assumptions and judgments regarding issues where the outcome is
unknown and actual results or values may differ significantly
from these estimates. The Companys fair value estimates do
not consider the tax effect that would be associated with the
disposition of the assets or liabilities at their fair value
estimates.
Fair values are estimated for loan portfolios with similar
financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by category, and
each loan category is further segmented into fixed and
adjustable interest rate categories and into performing and
non-performing categories.
F-16
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The fair value of performing loans is calculated by using an
income approach with Level 3 inputs. The fair value of
performing loans is estimated by discounting forecasted cash
flows through the estimated maturity using estimated market
discount rates that reflect the interest rate risk inherent in
the loan portfolio. The estimate of average maturity is based on
BankAtlantics historical experience with prepayments for
each loan classification, modified as required, by an estimate
of the effect of current economic and lending conditions.
Management assigns a credit risk premium and an illiquidity
adjustment to these loans based on risk grades and delinquency
status.
The fair value of tax certificates was calculated using the
income approach with Level 3 inputs. The fair value was
based on discounted expected cash flows using discount rates
that take into account the risk of the cash flows of tax
certificates relative to alternative investments.
The fair value of Federal Home Loan Bank stock is its carrying
amount.
The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as
non-interest bearing demand deposits, savings and NOW accounts,
and money market and checking accounts, is considered the same
as book value. The fair value of certificates of deposit is
based on an income approach with Level 3 inputs. The fair
value is calculated by the discounted value of contractual cash
flows with the discount rate estimated using current rates
offered by BankAtlantic for similar remaining maturities.
The fair value of short term borrowings was calculated using the
income approach with Level 2 inputs. The Company discounts
contractual cash flows based on current interest rates. The
carrying value of these borrowings approximates fair value as
maturities are generally less than thirty days.
The fair value of FHLB advances was calculated using the income
approach with Level 2 inputs. The fair value was based on
discounted cash flows using rates offered for debt with
comparable terms to maturity and issuer credit standing.
The fair values of subordinated debentures and mortgage and
notes payable were based on discounted values of contractual
cash flows at a credit adjusted market discount rate.
The fair value on $57.1 million of junior subordinated
debentures was obtained from NASDAQ price quotes as of
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The fair value of
the remaining junior subordinated debentures was obtained using
a market approach by obtaining price quotes from other obligors
that we believe may have similar risk profiles in the market
(Level 3).
Concentration
of Credit Risk
BankAtlantic purchases residential loans located throughout the
country. The majority of these residential loans are jumbo
residential loans. A jumbo loan has a principal amount above the
industry-standard definition of conventional conforming loan
limits. These loans could potentially have outstanding loan
balances significantly higher than related collateral values in
distressed areas of the country as a result of real estate value
declines in the housing market. Also, included in this purchased
residential loan portfolio are interest-only loans. These loans
result in possible future increases in a borrowers loan
payments when the contractually required repayments increase due
to interest rate movement and the required amortization of the
principal amount. These payment increases could affect a
borrowers ability to meet the debt service on or repay the
loan and lead to increased defaults and losses. At June 30,
2009, BankAtlantics residential loan portfolio included
$895.3 million of interest-only loans with 29% of the
principal amount of these loans secured by collateral located in
California. BankAtlantic manages this credit risk by purchasing
interest-only loans originated to borrowers that it believes to
be credit worthy, with
loan-to-value
and total debt to income ratios at origination within agency
guidelines.
BankAtlantic has a high concentration of consumer home equity
and commercial loans in the State of Florida. Real estate values
and general economic conditions have significantly deteriorated
from the origination
F-17
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
dates of the loans. If the market conditions in Florida do not
improve or deteriorate further BankAtlantic may be exposed to
significant credit losses.
|
|
4.
|
Noncontrolling
Interests
|
The following table summarizes the noncontrolling interests held
by others in the Companys subsidiaries at June 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
BankAtlantic Bancorp
|
|
$
|
116,699
|
|
|
|
170,888
|
|
Woodbridge
|
|
|
108,790
|
|
|
|
91,389
|
|
Other subsidiaries
|
|
|
3,935
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
229,424
|
|
|
|
262,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the noncontrolling interests loss
(earnings) recognized by others with respect to the
Companys subsidiaries for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
For the Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Noncontrolling Interests Continuing
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic Bancorp
|
|
$
|
26,868
|
|
|
|
14,806
|
|
|
|
59,517
|
|
|
|
33,585
|
|
Woodbridge
|
|
|
(518
|
)
|
|
|
7,094
|
|
|
|
(11,814
|
)
|
|
|
15,368
|
|
Other subsidiaries
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
486
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
26,617
|
|
|
|
21,826
|
|
|
|
48,189
|
|
|
|
48,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling Interests Discontinued
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic Bancorp
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,943
|
)
|
|
|
(857
|
)
|
Woodbridge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,943
|
)
|
|
|
(857
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss (Income) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
|
|
$
|
26,617
|
|
|
|
21,826
|
|
|
|
45,246
|
|
|
|
48,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise
about which separate financial information is available that is
regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker in
assessing performance and deciding how to allocate resources.
Reportable segments consist of one or more operating segments
with similar economic characteristics, products and services,
production processes, types of customers, distribution systems
or regulatory environments.
The information provided for segment reporting is based on
internal reports utilized by management of the Company and its
respective subsidiaries. The presentation and allocation of
assets and results of operations may not reflect the actual
economic costs of the segments as stand alone businesses. If a
different basis of allocation were utilized, the relative
contributions of the segments might differ but the relative
trends in segments operating results would, in
managements view, likely not be impacted.
F-18
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The Company operates through five reportable segments, which
are: BFC Activities, BankAtlantic, BankAtlantic Bancorp Other
Operations, Land Division and Woodbridge Other Operations. The
Companys financial services activities include
BankAtlantic Bancorps results of operations and consist of
two reportable segments, which are: BankAtlantic and
BankAtlantic Bancorp Other Operations. The Companys real
estate development activities include Woodbridges results
of operations and consist of two reportable segments, which are:
Land Division and Woodbridge Other Operations.
The Company evaluates segment performance based on net income
(loss) net of tax and noncontrolling interests.
The following summarizes the aggregation of the Companys
operating segments into reportable segments:
BFC
Activities
This segment includes all of the operations and all of the
assets owned by BFC other than BankAtlantic Bancorp and its
subsidiaries and Woodbridge Holdings Corporation and its
subsidiaries. The BFC Activities segment includes dividends from
BFCs investment in Benihanas convertible preferred
stock and income and expenses associated with shared service
operations in the areas of human resources, risk management,
investor relations and executive office administration and other
services that BFC provides to BankAtlantic Bancorp and
Woodbridge pursuant to shared services agreements. Additionally,
BFC provides certain risk management and administrative services
to Bluegreen. This segment also includes BFCs overhead and
expenses, the financial results of venture partnerships that BFC
controls and BFCs benefit for income taxes.
BankAtlantic
The Companys BankAtlantic segment consists of the banking
operations of BankAtlantic.
BankAtlantic
Bancorp Other Operations
The BankAtlantic Bancorp Other Operations segment consists of
the operations of BankAtlantic Bancorp other than the banking
operations of BankAtlantic, including cost of acquisitions,
asset and capital management and financing activities.
Additionally, effective March 31, 2008, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of BankAtlantic Bancorp purchased non-performing
loans from BankAtlantic. As a consequence BankAtlantic Bancorp
Other Operations activities include managing this portfolio of
loans and real estate owned.
Land
Division
The Companys Land Division segment consists of Core
Communities operations.
Woodbridge
Other Operations
The Woodbridge Other Operations segment consists of Woodbridge
Holdings Corporations operations, the operations of Pizza
Fusion and Carolina Oak, and other investment activities through
Cypress Creek Capital and Snapper Creek. Woodbridges
equity investment in Bluegreen and its investment in Office
Depot are also included in the Woodbridge Other Operations
segment.
F-19
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The tables below set forth the Companys segment
information as of and for the three month periods ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bancorp
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodbridge
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
BFC
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
Activities
|
|
|
BankAtlantic
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of real estate
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,408
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
1,767
|
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
56,991
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
57,892
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
1,008
|
|
|
|
32,751
|
|
|
|
(971
|
)
|
|
|
2,613
|
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
(1,168
|
)
|
|
|
34,808
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
1,264
|
|
|
|
89,742
|
|
|
|
(775
|
)
|
|
|
4,071
|
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
|
|
(846
|
)
|
|
|
94,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sale of real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,113
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1,301
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,913
|
|
|
|
4,002
|
|
|
|
1,301
|
|
|
|
2,446
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
24,561
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,955
|
|
|
|
7,539
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,494
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
2,915
|
|
|
|
61,077
|
|
|
|
1,860
|
|
|
|
5,162
|
|
|
|
5,209
|
|
|
|
(831
|
)
|
|
|
75,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
2,915
|
|
|
|
113,945
|
|
|
|
13,401
|
|
|
|
7,576
|
|
|
|
7,828
|
|
|
|
(917
|
)
|
|
|
144,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in (loss) earnings from unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,714
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
10,755
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(1,668
|
)
|
|
|
(24,178
|
)
|
|
|
(14,178
|
)
|
|
|
(3,505
|
)
|
|
|
3,897
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
(39,526
|
)
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(1,668
|
)
|
|
|
(24,178
|
)
|
|
|
(14,178
|
)
|
|
|
(3,505
|
)
|
|
|
3,897
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
(39,526
|
)
|
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
16,936
|
|
|
|
9,931
|
|
|
|
2,823
|
|
|
|
(2,878
|
)
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
26,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to BFC
|
|
$
|
(1,671
|
)
|
|
|
(7,242
|
)
|
|
|
(4,247
|
)
|
|
|
(682
|
)
|
|
|
1,019
|
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
(12,909
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
42,853
|
|
|
|
5,189,711
|
|
|
|
469,533
|
|
|
|
329,889
|
|
|
|
201,526
|
|
|
|
(420,515
|
)
|
|
|
5,812,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bancorp
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodbridge
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
BFC
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
Activities
|
|
|
BankAtlantic
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of real estate
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,711
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
2,395
|
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
78,081
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
79,443
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
1,311
|
|
|
|
37,539
|
|
|
|
6,314
|
|
|
|
3,019
|
|
|
|
1,493
|
|
|
|
(1,633
|
)
|
|
|
48,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
1,653
|
|
|
|
115,620
|
|
|
|
6,783
|
|
|
|
4,865
|
|
|
|
2,618
|
|
|
|
(1,658
|
)
|
|
|
129,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales of real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,145
|
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
1,760
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,158
|
|
|
|
4,791
|
|
|
|
871
|
|
|
|
2,104
|
|
|
|
(571
|
)
|
|
|
35,353
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,801
|
|
|
|
9,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,247
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
3,281
|
|
|
|
72,337
|
|
|
|
1,666
|
|
|
|
5,320
|
|
|
|
7,651
|
|
|
|
(1,222
|
)
|
|
|
89,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
3,281
|
|
|
|
138,296
|
|
|
|
15,903
|
|
|
|
7,336
|
|
|
|
10,342
|
|
|
|
(1,765
|
)
|
|
|
173,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in (loss) earnings from unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(811
|
)
|
|
|
1,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(1,683
|
)
|
|
|
(23,487
|
)
|
|
|
(8,022
|
)
|
|
|
(2,471
|
)
|
|
|
(6,513
|
)
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
(42,069
|
)
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
(3,180
|
)
|
|
|
(9,428
|
)
|
|
|
(2,718
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,326
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
1,497
|
|
|
|
(14,059
|
)
|
|
|
(5,304
|
)
|
|
|
(2,471
|
)
|
|
|
(6,513
|
)
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
(26,743
|
)
|
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
8,654
|
|
|
|
3,261
|
|
|
|
2,708
|
|
|
|
7,189
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
21,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to BFC
|
|
$
|
1,548
|
|
|
|
(5,405
|
)
|
|
|
(2,043
|
)
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
676
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
(4,917
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
36,343
|
|
|
|
6,369,148
|
|
|
|
704,430
|
|
|
|
362,709
|
|
|
|
316,389
|
|
|
|
(623,518
|
)
|
|
|
7,165,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-21
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The tables below set forth the Companys segment
information as of and for the six month periods ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bancorp
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodbridge
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended
|
|
BFC
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
Activities
|
|
|
BankAtlantic
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of real estate
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,835
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
3,194
|
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
119,400
|
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
554
|
|
|
|
121,305
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
1,917
|
|
|
|
65,538
|
|
|
|
(629
|
)
|
|
|
5,121
|
|
|
|
1,266
|
|
|
|
(2,251
|
)
|
|
|
70,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
2,431
|
|
|
|
184,938
|
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
|
|
8,049
|
|
|
|
1,925
|
|
|
|
(1,658
|
)
|
|
|
195,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sale of real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,806
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1,994
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,553
|
|
|
|
8,232
|
|
|
|
2,671
|
|
|
|
3,849
|
|
|
|
(212
|
)
|
|
|
52,093
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,475
|
|
|
|
8,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,771
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
5,873
|
|
|
|
132,780
|
|
|
|
3,564
|
|
|
|
11,409
|
|
|
|
9,716
|
|
|
|
(2,158
|
)
|
|
|
161,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
5,873
|
|
|
|
249,808
|
|
|
|
20,092
|
|
|
|
15,886
|
|
|
|
13,738
|
|
|
|
(2,355
|
)
|
|
|
303,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in (loss) earnings from unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,050
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
17,250
|
|
Impairment of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,401
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,401
|
)
|
Impairment of investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,396
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,396
|
)
|
Gain on settlement of investment in Woodbridges subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,985
|
|
|
|
13,384
|
|
|
|
40,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(3,530
|
)
|
|
|
(64,767
|
)
|
|
|
(20,200
|
)
|
|
|
(7,837
|
)
|
|
|
9,425
|
|
|
|
14,150
|
|
|
|
(72,759
|
)
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations
|
|
|
(3,530
|
)
|
|
|
(64,767
|
)
|
|
|
(20,200
|
)
|
|
|
(7,837
|
)
|
|
|
9,425
|
|
|
|
14,150
|
|
|
|
(72,759
|
)
|
Discontinued operations, less income taxes
|
|
|
1,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,258
|
)
|
|
|
4,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(2,272
|
)
|
|
|
(64,767
|
)
|
|
|
(15,999
|
)
|
|
|
(7,837
|
)
|
|
|
9,425
|
|
|
|
12,892
|
|
|
|
(68,558
|
)
|
Less: Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
45,367
|
|
|
|
11,207
|
|
|
|
6,181
|
|
|
|
(6,960
|
)
|
|
|
(10,561
|
)
|
|
|
45,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to BFC
|
|
$
|
(2,260
|
)
|
|
|
(19,400
|
)
|
|
|
(4,792
|
)
|
|
|
(1,656
|
)
|
|
|
2,465
|
|
|
|
2,331
|
|
|
|
(23,312
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-22
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bancorp
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodbridge
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended
|
|
BFC
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
Activities
|
|
|
BankAtlantic
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of real estate
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,865
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
2,549
|
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
|
762
|
|
|
|
161,439
|
|
|
|
889
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
1,777
|
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
165,045
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
71,979
|
|
|
|
1,506
|
|
|
|
6,439
|
|
|
|
1,807
|
|
|
|
(3,029
|
)
|
|
|
81,702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
3,762
|
|
|
|
233,418
|
|
|
|
2,395
|
|
|
|
8,628
|
|
|
|
4,219
|
|
|
|
(3,126
|
)
|
|
|
249,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales of real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,173
|
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
1,848
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,511
|
|
|
|
10,585
|
|
|
|
1,864
|
|
|
|
4,777
|
|
|
|
(1,398
|
)
|
|
|
79,339
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,689
|
|
|
|
9,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,135
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
7,439
|
|
|
|
140,963
|
|
|
|
3,341
|
|
|
|
10,851
|
|
|
|
14,747
|
|
|
|
(2,001
|
)
|
|
|
175,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
7,439
|
|
|
|
285,163
|
|
|
|
23,372
|
|
|
|
13,888
|
|
|
|
20,111
|
|
|
|
(3,311
|
)
|
|
|
346,662
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in (loss) earnings from unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
1,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(3,730
|
)
|
|
|
(51,443
|
)
|
|
|
(19,717
|
)
|
|
|
(5,260
|
)
|
|
|
(14,155
|
)
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
(94,120
|
)
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
(7,046
|
)
|
|
|
(20,403
|
)
|
|
|
(6,830
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,279
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations
|
|
|
3,316
|
|
|
|
(31,040
|
)
|
|
|
(12,887
|
)
|
|
|
(5,260
|
)
|
|
|
(14,155
|
)
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
(59,841
|
)
|
Discontinued operations, less income tax
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
|
|
1,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
3,478
|
|
|
|
(31,040
|
)
|
|
|
(11,766
|
)
|
|
|
(5,260
|
)
|
|
|
(14,155
|
)
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
(58,822
|
)
|
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
22,257
|
|
|
|
8,437
|
|
|
|
4,691
|
|
|
|
12,623
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
48,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to BFC
|
|
$
|
3,541
|
|
|
|
(8,783
|
)
|
|
|
(3,329
|
)
|
|
|
(569
|
)
|
|
|
(1,532
|
)
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
|
|
(10,788
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On September 18, 2008, Woodbridge, indirectly through its
wholly-owned subsidiary, PF Program Partnership, LP (formerly
Woodbridge Equity Fund II LP), purchased for an aggregate
of $3.0 million, 2,608,696 shares of Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock of Pizza Fusion, together with
warrants to purchase up to 1,500,000 additional shares of
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of Pizza Fusion at an
exercise price of $1.44 per share. Woodbridge also received
options, exercisable on or prior to September 18, 2009, to
purchase up to 521,740 additional shares of Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock of Pizza Fusion at a price of $1.15
per share, which options, if exercised, entitled Woodbridge to
also receive warrants to purchase up to 300,000 additional
shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of Pizza
Fusion at an exercise price of $1.44 per share. On July 2,
2009, Woodbridge exercised its option to purchase
521,740 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
of Pizza Fusion at a price of $1.15 per share or an aggregate
purchase price of $600,000. Upon the exercise of the option,
Woodbridge was also granted warrants to purchase up to 300,000
additional shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
of Pizza Fusion at an exercise price of $1.44 per share. The
warrants have a term of 10 years, subject to earlier
expiration under certain circumstances.
F-23
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Pizza Fusion is a restaurant franchise which was founded in 2006
and which operates in a niche market within the quick service
and organic food industries. As of June 30, 2009, Pizza
Fusion was operating 20 locations throughout the United
States and had entered into franchise agreements to open an
additional 9 stores by February 2010.
During 2008, Woodbridge evaluated its investment in Pizza Fusion
under FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation
of Variable Interest Entities
(FIN No. 46(R)), and determined that Pizza
Fusion is a variable interest entity. Pizza Fusion is in its
early stages and will likely require additional financial
support for its normal operations and further expansion of its
franchise operations. Furthermore, on a fully diluted basis,
Woodbridges investment represents a significant interest
in Pizza Fusion and, therefore, Woodbridge is expected to bear
the majority of the variability of the risks and rewards of
Pizza Fusion. Additionally, as shareholder of the Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock, Woodbridge has control over the
Board of Directors of Pizza Fusion. Based upon these factors,
Woodbridge concluded that it is the primary beneficiary.
Accordingly, under purchase accounting, the assets and
liabilities of Pizza Fusion are consolidated in accordance with
Statement of SFAS No. 141 Business
Combinations. However, the assets of Pizza Fusion are
not available to Woodbridge.
Woodbridge recorded $5.5 million in other intangible
assets, including $1.1 million in goodwill related to its
investment in Pizza Fusion. The intangible assets consist
primarily of the value of franchise agreements that had been
executed by Pizza Fusion at the acquisition date. These
intangible assets will be amortized over the length of the
franchise agreements which is generally 10 years.
|
|
7.
|
Discontinued
Operations
|
On February 28, 2007, BankAtlantic Bancorp sold Ryan Beck
to Stifel. The Stifel sales agreement provided for contingent
earn-out payments, payable in cash or shares of Stifel common
stock, at Stifels election, based on certain defined
revenues generated by Ryan Beck during the two-year period which
ended on February 28, 2009. The contingent earn-out
payments were accounted for when earned as additional proceeds
from the sale. BankAtlantic Bancorp received additional earn-out
consideration of $1.7 million during the six months ended
June 30, 2008 and recognized $4.2 million of
additional earn-out consideration during the six months ended
June 30, 2009.
|
|
8.
|
Restructuring
Charges and Exit Activities
|
BankAtlantic
Bancorp and BankAtlantic
The following set forth liabilities associated with
restructuring charges and exit activities (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
|
1,092
|
|
Expenses incurred
|
|
|
2,095
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
2,456
|
|
Amounts paid or amortized
|
|
|
(1,105
|
)
|
|
|
(288
|
)
|
|
|
(1,393
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
1,092
|
|
|
|
1,063
|
|
|
|
2,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2009
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
|
1,462
|
|
|
|
1,633
|
|
Expense incurred
|
|
|
1,946
|
|
|
|
1,301
|
|
|
|
3,247
|
|
Amounts paid or amortized
|
|
|
(1,693
|
)
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
(1,753
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
424
|
|
|
|
2,703
|
|
|
|
3,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-24
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
In April 2008, BankAtlantic Bancorp reduced its workforce by
approximately 124 associates, or 6%. BankAtlantic Bancorp
incurred $2.1 million of employee termination costs which
was included in the Companys consolidated statements of
operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008.
In March 2009, BankAtlantic Bancorp further reduced its
workforce by approximately 130 associates, or 7%, impacting
back-office functions as well as its community banking and
commercial lending business units. Approximately
$1.9 million of employee termination costs was incurred
which were included in the consolidated statements of operations
for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, BankAtlantic
Bancorp incurred $0.4 million of contract liabilities in
connection with the termination of back-office operating leases.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, BankAtlantic
Bancorp recognized an additional $1.3 million of contract
termination liabilities in connection with operating leases
executed for future store expansion. The additional contract
liability reflects declining commercial real estate values
during the period.
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation and Levitt and Sons
The following table summarizes the restructuring related
accruals activity recorded for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractor
|
|
|
Surety Bond
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Agreements
|
|
|
Accrual
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
1,954
|
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
|
|
1,421
|
|
|
|
1,826
|
|
|
|
6,211
|
|
Restructuring charges (credits)
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
1,988
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(2,681
|
)
|
|
|
(259
|
)
|
|
|
(412
|
)
|
|
|
(532
|
)
|
|
|
(3,884
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008
|
|
$
|
1,296
|
|
|
|
891
|
|
|
|
984
|
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
|
|
4,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
|
597
|
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
|
|
2,574
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
(388
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(822
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
1,107
|
|
|
|
1,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On November 9, 2007, Woodbridge implemented an employee
fund and indicated that it would pay up to $5.0 million of
severance benefits to terminated Levitt and Sons employees to
supplement the limited termination benefits which Levitt and
Sons was permitted to pay to those employees. Levitt and Sons
was restricted in the payment of termination benefits to its
former employees by virtue of the Chapter 11 Cases.
The severance related and benefits accrual includes severance
payments, payroll taxes and other benefits related to the
terminations of Levitt and Sons employees as well as other
employees of Woodbridge, that occurred in 2007 as part of the
Chapter 11 Cases. Woodbridge did not incur any significant
severance and benefits related restructuring charges in the
three months ended June 30, 2009, while, during the three
months ended June 30, 2008, incurred charges of
approximately $816,000. During the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, Woodbridge incurred severance and
benefits related restructuring charges of approximately $82,000
and $2.0 million, respectively. For the three months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, Woodbridge paid approximately
$79,000 and $1.2 million, respectively in severance and
termination charges related to the above described employee fund
as well as severance for employees other than Levitt and Sons
employees, all of which are reflected in the Woodbridge Other
Operations segment. For the six months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008, these payments amounted to approximately $211,000 and
$2.7 million, respectively. Employees entitled to
participate in the fund either received a payment stream, which
in certain cases extended over two years, or
F-25
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
a lump sum payment, dependent on a variety of factors. Former
Levitt and Sons employees who received these payments were
required to assign to Woodbridge their unsecured claims against
Levitt and Sons.
The facilities accrual as of June 30, 2009 represents
expense associated with property and equipment leases that
Woodbridge had entered into that are no longer providing a
benefit to Woodbridge, as well as termination fees related to
contractual obligations that Woodbridge cancelled. Included in
this amount are future minimum lease payments, fees and expenses
for which the provisions of SFAS No. 146,
Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal
Activities, were satisfied. Total cash payments
related to the facilities accrual were $93,000 and $173,000 for
the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Total cash payments related to the facilities
accrual were $186,000 and $259,000 for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The independent contractor agreements accrual relates to two
consulting agreements entered into by Woodbridge with former
Levitt and Sons employees. The total commitment related to these
agreements as of June 30, 2009 was approximately $248,000
and will be paid monthly through December 2009. During the three
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company paid
$182,000 and $206,000, respectively, under these agreements.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the
Company paid $388,000 and $412,000, respectively, under these
agreements.
As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, Woodbridge
had $1.1 million in surety bonds accrual related to certain
bonds where Woodbridges management believes it to be
probable that Woodbridge will be required to reimburse the
surety under applicable indemnity agreements. Woodbridge did not
reimburse any amounts during the three months ended
June 30, 2009 while it reimbursed approximately $367,000
during the three months ended June 30, 2008 in accordance
with the indemnity agreement for bond claims paid during the
period. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
Woodbridge reimbursed the surety approximately $37,000 and
$532,000, respectively. It is unclear whether and to what extent
the remaining outstanding surety bonds of Levitt and Sons will
be drawn and the extent to which Woodbridge may be responsible
for additional amounts beyond this accrual. There is no
assurance that Woodbridge will not be responsible for amounts in
excess of the $1.1 million accrual. Woodbridge will not
receive any repayment, assets or other consideration as recovery
of any amounts it may be required to pay. (See Note 17)
|
|
9.
|
Securities
Available for Sale
|
The following tables summarize securities available for sale (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Government agency securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
281,954
|
|
|
|
11,189
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
293,141
|
|
Real estate mortgage investment conduits(1)
|
|
|
134,627
|
|
|
|
3,034
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
137,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
416,581
|
|
|
|
14,223
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
430,732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other bonds
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock
|
|
|
16,426
|
|
|
|
4,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,511
|
|
Equity securities(2)
|
|
|
2,912
|
|
|
|
4,771
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
7,678
|
|
Total investment securities
|
|
|
19,588
|
|
|
|
8,856
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
28,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
436,169
|
|
|
|
23,079
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
459,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Mortgage-Backed Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
521,895
|
|
|
|
11,017
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
532,873
|
|
Real estate mortgage investment conduits(1)
|
|
|
165,449
|
|
|
|
1,846
|
|
|
|
944
|
|
|
|
166,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
687,344
|
|
|
|
12,863
|
|
|
|
983
|
|
|
|
699,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock
|
|
|
16,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,426
|
|
Equity securities(2)
|
|
|
6,686
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,798
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
|
|
|
23,362
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
710,706
|
|
|
|
12,975
|
|
|
|
983
|
|
|
|
722,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Real estate mortgage investment conduits are pass-through
entities that hold residential loans and investors are issued
ownership interests in the entities in the form of a bond. The
issuers of the securities were government agencies. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Equity securities includes Woodbridges investment in
Office Depots common stock with an estimated fair value of
approximately $6.5 million and $4.3 million at
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively,
discussed below. |
Included in Financial Services securities activities, net in the
Companys Consolidated Statements of Operations were (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
For the Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Gross gains on securities sales
|
|
$
|
2,070
|
|
|
|
5,663
|
|
|
|
6,510
|
|
|
|
7,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross losses on securities sales
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of securities
|
|
$
|
43,277
|
|
|
|
200,504
|
|
|
|
205,706
|
|
|
|
341,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management of BankAtlantic Bancorp reviews its investments
portfolio for
other-than-temporary
declines in value quarterly. As a consequence of the review
during the 2009 and 2008 quarters, BankAtlantic Bancorp
recognized $1.4 million and $1.1 million,
respectively, in
other-than-temporary
declines in value related to an equity investment in an
unrelated financial institution, respectively. During the three
and six months ended June 30, 2008, BankAtlantic Bancorp
recognized $4.5 million and $2.6 million of unrealized
gains, respectively, from the change in value of Stifel warrants.
BFC
Benihana Investment
The Company owns 800,000 shares of Benihana Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock (Convertible Preferred
Stock). The Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible
into an aggregate of 1,578,943 shares of Benihanas
Common Stock at a conversion price of $12.67 per share of
Convertible Preferred Stock, subject to adjustment from time to
time upon certain defined events. Based on the number of
currently outstanding shares of Benihanas capital stock,
the Convertible Preferred Stock, if converted, would represent
an approximately 19% voting interest and an approximately 9%
economic interest in Benihana. Holders of the
F-27
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to receive cumulative
quarterly dividends at an annual rate equal to $1.25 per share,
payable on the last day of each calendar quarter. The
Convertible Preferred Stock is subject to mandatory redemption
at the original issue price plus accumulated dividends on
July 2, 2014 unless BFC elects to extend the mandatory
redemption date to a later date not to extend beyond
July 2, 2024. At June 30, 2009, the closing price of
Benihanas Common Stock was $7.05 per share. The market
value of the Convertible Preferred Stock if converted to
Benihanas Common Stock at June 30, 2009 would have
been approximately $11.1 million.
In December 2008, the Company performed an impairment review of
its investment in the Convertible Preferred Stock to determine
if an impairment adjustment was needed. Based on the evaluation
and the review of various qualitative and quantitative factors,
including the decline in the underlying trading value of
Benihanas Common Stock at December 31, 2008 and the
redemption provisions of the Convertible Preferred Stock, the
Company determined that there was an
other-than-temporary
decline of approximately $3.6 million and, accordingly, the
investment was written down to its fair value of approximately
$16.4 million at December 31, 2008. Concurrent with
managements evaluation of the impairment of this
investment at December 31, 2008, it made the determination
to reclassify this investment from investment securities to
investment securities available for sale. At June 30, 2009,
the Companys fair value of its investments in
Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock was approximately
$20.5 million which includes a gross unrealized gain of
approximately $4.1 million. BFC will continue to monitor
this investment to determine whether any further
other-than-temporary
impairment may be required in future periods. The fair value of
the Companys investment in Benihanas Convertible
Preferred Stock was assessed using the income approach with
Level 3 inputs by discounting future cash flows at a market
discount rate combined with the fair value of the underlying
shares, as if converted, that BFC owns in Benihanas
Convertible Preferred Stock.
See Note 18 for additional information concerning the
Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock.
Office
Depot Investment
At June 30, 2009, Woodbridge owned approximately
1.4 million shares of Office Depots common stock,
representing less than 1% of Office Depots outstanding
common stock as of that date. This investment is reviewed
quarterly for
other-than-temporary
impairments in accordance with FSP
FAS 115-1/FAS 124-1
and is accounted for under the
available-for-sale
method of accounting whereby any unrealized holding gains or
losses are included in equity.
During the quarters ended December 31, 2008, March 31,
2009 and June 30, 2009, Woodbridge performed impairment
analyses of its investment in Office Depot. The impairment
analyses included an evaluation of, among other things,
qualitative and quantitative factors relating to the performance
of Office Depot and its stock price. As a result of these
evaluations, Woodbridge determined that
other-than-temporary
impairment charges were required at December 31, 2008 and
March 31, 2009 and recorded a $12.0 million impairment
charge relating to its investment in Office Depot in the three
months ended December 31, 2008 and an additional
$2.4 million impairment charge in the three months ended
March 31, 2009. Based on its impairment evaluation
performed during the quarter ended June 30, 2009,
Woodbridge determined that its investment in Office Depot was
not impaired at June 30, 2009.
F-28
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Data with respect to this investment as of June 30, 2009 is
shown in the table below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Fair value at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
4,278
|
|
Other-than-temporary
impairment during the three months ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
(2,396
|
)
|
Unrealized holding gain
|
|
|
4,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
6,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodbridge valued Office Depots common stock using a
market approach valuation technique and Level 1 valuation
inputs. Woodbridge uses quoted market prices to value equity
securities. The fair value of Office Depots common stock
at June 30, 2009 of $6.5 million was calculated based
upon the $4.56 closing price of Office Depots common stock
on the New York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2009. On
August 6, 2009, the closing price of Office Depot common
stock was $5.06 per share.
The consolidated loan portfolio consisted of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$
|
1,741,051
|
|
|
|
1,916,562
|
|
Builder land loans
|
|
|
76,892
|
|
|
|
84,453
|
|
Land acquisition and development
|
|
|
208,606
|
|
|
|
226,484
|
|
Land acquisition, development and construction
|
|
|
43,964
|
|
|
|
60,730
|
|
Construction and development
|
|
|
212,675
|
|
|
|
229,856
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
732,604
|
|
|
|
713,571
|
|
Consumer home equity
|
|
|
697,631
|
|
|
|
718,950
|
|
Small business
|
|
|
212,564
|
|
|
|
218,694
|
|
Other loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business
|
|
|
140,651
|
|
|
|
144,554
|
|
Small business non-mortgage
|
|
|
101,439
|
|
|
|
108,230
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
13,941
|
|
|
|
16,406
|
|
Deposit overdrafts
|
|
|
8,240
|
|
|
|
9,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross loans
|
|
|
4,190,258
|
|
|
|
4,448,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums, discounts and net deferred fees
|
|
|
3,029
|
|
|
|
3,221
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(172,220
|
)
|
|
|
(137,257
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable net
|
|
$
|
4,021,067
|
|
|
|
4,314,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
$
|
7,694
|
|
|
|
3,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale at June 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008 are loans that were originated through the assistance of an
independent mortgage company. The mortgage company provides
processing and closing assistance to BankAtlantic. Pursuant to
an agreement, this mortgage company purchases the loans from
BankAtlantic 14 days after the date of funding.
BankAtlantic owns the loan during the 14 day period and
F-29
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
accordingly earns the interest income during the period. Gains
from the sale of loans held for sale were $151,000 and $263,000
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009,
respectively, and were $129,000 and $205,000 for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.
Undisbursed loans in process consisted of the following
components (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Construction and development
|
|
$
|
56,374
|
|
|
|
124,332
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
34,716
|
|
|
|
38,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total undisbursed loans in process
|
|
$
|
91,090
|
|
|
|
163,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
For the Six
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
158,397
|
|
|
|
89,836
|
|
|
|
137,257
|
|
|
|
94,020
|
|
Loans charged-off
|
|
|
(30,332
|
)
|
|
|
(31,401
|
)
|
|
|
(54,261
|
)
|
|
|
(78,648
|
)
|
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
1,453
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (charge-offs)
|
|
|
(29,671
|
)
|
|
|
(30,957
|
)
|
|
|
(52,808
|
)
|
|
|
(78,029
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
43,494
|
|
|
|
47,247
|
|
|
|
87,771
|
|
|
|
90,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
172,220
|
|
|
|
106,126
|
|
|
|
172,220
|
|
|
|
106,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following summarizes impaired loans (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Specific
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Specific
|
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Allowances
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Allowances
|
|
|
Impaired loans with specific valuation allowances
|
|
$
|
246,240
|
|
|
|
58,693
|
|
|
|
174,710
|
|
|
|
41,192
|
|
Impaired loans without specific valuation allowances
|
|
|
260,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
506,675
|
|
|
|
58,693
|
|
|
|
313,258
|
|
|
|
41,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009, impaired loans with specific valuation
allowances had been previously charged down by
$40.0 million and impaired loans without specific valuation
allowances had been previously charged down by
$21.4 million. As of December 31, 2008, impaired loans
with specific valuation allowances had been previously charged
down by $21.9 million and impaired loans without specific
valuation allowances had been previously charged down by
$29.5 million.
F-30
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Interest income which would have been recorded under the
contractual terms of impaired loans and the interest income
actually recognized were (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
For the Six
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
Contracted interest income
|
|
$
|
6,408
|
|
|
|
11,505
|
|
Interest income recognized
|
|
|
734
|
|
|
|
1,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foregone interest income
|
|
$
|
5,674
|
|
|
|
10,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Real
Estate Held for Development and Sale
|
Real estate held for development and sale consisted of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Land and land development costs
|
|
$
|
221,746
|
|
|
|
221,684
|
|
Construction costs
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
Capitalized interest and other costs
|
|
|
40,727
|
|
|
|
38,539
|
|
Land held for sale
|
|
|
8,043
|
|
|
|
8,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
270,958
|
|
|
|
268,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate held for development and sale includes the combined
real estate assets of Woodbridge and its subsidiaries as well as
BankAtlantics residential construction development. Also
included in other real estate held for development and sale in
the Companys Consolidated Statements of Financial
Condition is BFCs unsold land at the commercial
development known as Center Port in Pompano Beach, Florida.
Real estate inventory is reviewed for impairment on a
project-by-project
basis. Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount
of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to
be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying
amount of an asset to estimated future undiscounted cash flows
expected to be generated by the asset, or by using appraisals of
the related assets. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds
its estimated future undiscounted cash flows, an impairment
charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount
of the asset exceeds its fair value.
|
|
12.
|
Investments
in Unconsolidated Affiliates
|
At June 30, 2009, Woodbridge owned approximately
9.5 million shares of Bluegreens common stock
representing approximately 31% of Bluegreens outstanding
common stock. Woodbridge accounts for its investment in
Bluegreen under the equity method of accounting. The cost of the
Bluegreen investment is adjusted to recognize Woodbridges
interest in Bluegreens earnings or losses. The difference
between a) Woodbridges ownership percentage in
Bluegreen multiplied by its earnings and b) the amount of
Woodbridges equity in earnings of Bluegreen as reflected
in Woodbridges financial statements relates to the
amortization or accretion of purchase accounting adjustments
made at the time of the acquisition of Bluegreens common
stock and a basis difference due to impairment charges recorded
on Woodbridges investment in Bluegreen, as described below.
During 2008, Woodbridge began evaluating its investment in
Bluegreen on a quarterly basis for
other-than-temporary
impairments, and these evaluations generally include an analysis
of various quantitative and qualitative factors relating to the
performance of Bluegreen and its stock price. Woodbridge values
Bluegreens common stock using a market approach valuation
technique and Level 1 valuation inputs. Based
F-31
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
on the results of its evaluations during the quarters ended
September 30, 2008, December 31, 2008 and
March 31, 2009, Woodbridge determined that
other-than-temporary
impairments were necessary for those periods. As a result,
Woodbridge recorded impairment charges of $53.6 million,
$40.8 million and $20.4 million during the quarters
ended September 30, 2008, December 31, 2008 and
March 31, 2009, respectively. Based on its impairment
evaluation performed during the quarter ended June 30,
2009, Woodbridge determined that its investment in Bluegreen was
not impaired at June 30, 2009. As of June 30, 2009,
the carrying value of Woodbridges investment in Bluegreen
was $28.6 million.
As a result of the impairment charges taken at
September 30, 2008, December 31, 2008 and
March 31, 2009, a basis difference was created between
Woodbridges investment in Bluegreen and the underlying
assets and liabilities carried on the books of Bluegreen.
Therefore, earnings from Bluegreen will be adjusted each period
to reflect the amortization of this basis difference. As such,
Woodbridge established an allocation methodology by which
Woodbridge allocated the impairment loss to the relative fair
value of Bluegreens underlying assets based upon the
position that the impairment loss was a reflection of the
perceived value of these underlying assets. The appropriate
amortization will be calculated based on the useful lives of the
underlying assets and other relevant data associated with each
asset category. As such, the amortization for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 of approximately
$8.6 million and $13.9 million, respectively, was
recorded into Woodbridges pro rata share of
Bluegreens net income.
The following table shows the reconciliation of
Woodbridges pro rata share of Bluegreens net income
to Woodbridges total earnings from Bluegreen recorded in
the unaudited consolidated statements of operations (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
Pro rata share of Bluegreens net income
|
|
$
|
2,076
|
|
|
|
3,158
|
|
Amortization of basis difference
|
|
|
8,638
|
|
|
|
13,892
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earnings from Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
$
|
10,714
|
|
|
|
17,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table shows the reconciliation of
Woodbridges pro rata share of its net investment in
Bluegreen and its investment in Bluegreen after impairment
charges (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Pro rata share of investment in Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
$
|
35,089
|
|
|
|
115,072
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustment (from the step acquisition)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,700
|
)
|
Amortization of basis difference
|
|
|
13,892
|
|
|
|
13,850
|
|
Less: Impairment of investment in Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
|
(20,401
|
)
|
|
|
(94,433
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
$
|
28,580
|
|
|
|
29,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-32
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Bluegreens unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets
and unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income are as
follows (in thousands):
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,196,265
|
|
|
|
1,193,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
764,147
|
|
|
|
781,522
|
|
Total Bluegreen shareholders equity
|
|
|
399,864
|
|
|
|
382,467
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
32,254
|
|
|
|
29,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
432,118
|
|
|
|
411,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,196,265
|
|
|
|
1,193,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Revenues and other income
|
|
$
|
92,031
|
|
|
|
151,603
|
|
|
|
170,520
|
|
|
|
290,955
|
|
Cost and other expenses
|
|
|
86,321
|
|
|
|
144,726
|
|
|
|
157,775
|
|
|
|
280,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before noncontrolling interests and provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
5,710
|
|
|
|
6,877
|
|
|
|
12,745
|
|
|
|
9,966
|
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
|
|
|
2,654
|
|
|
|
(2,112
|
)
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
(2,967
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
8,364
|
|
|
|
4,765
|
|
|
|
13,103
|
|
|
|
6,999
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
1,550
|
|
|
|
(1,320
|
)
|
|
|
2,736
|
|
|
|
(2,158
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Bluegreen
|
|
$
|
6,814
|
|
|
|
3,445
|
|
|
|
10,367
|
|
|
|
4,841
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill is tested for potential impairment annually or during
interim periods if impairment indicators exist. In response to
the deteriorating economic and real estate environments and the
effects that the external environment had on BankAtlantics
business units, BankAtlantic, in the first quarter of 2009,
continued to reduce its asset balances with a view toward
strengthening its regulatory capital ratios and revised its
projected operating results to reflect a smaller organization in
subsequent periods. Additionally, BankAtlantic Bancorps
market capitalization continued to decline as the average
closing price of BankAtlantic Bancorps Class A common
stock on the NYSE for the month of March 2009 was $1.57 compared
to $4.23 for the month of December 2008, a decline of 63%.
Management of BankAtlantic Bancorp believed that the foregoing
factors indicated that the fair value of its reporting units
might have declined below their carrying amount, and,
accordingly, an interim goodwill impairment test was performed
as of March 31, 2009.
Based on the results of the interim goodwill impairment
evaluation, an impairment charge of $8.5 million, net of
purchase accounting adjustment from step acquisition of
approximately $0.6 million, was recorded during the three
months ended March 31, 2009. The entire amount of goodwill
relating to BankAtlantics tax certificate
($4.7 million) and investment ($4.4 million) reporting
units was determined to be impaired. Goodwill of
$13.1 million associated with BankAtlantics capital
services reporting unit was determined not to be impaired.
Management did not perform a goodwill impairment test as of
June 30, 2009 as there were no significant changes in
impairment indicators during the three months ended
June 30, 2009.
F-33
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
BankAtlantic Bancorps management believes that the
goodwill impairment recorded during 2009 generally reflects the
ongoing adverse conditions in the financial services industry,
as well as the decline of BankAtlantic Bancorps market
capitalization below its tangible book value and BankAtlantic
Bancorps decision to reduce the size of certain reporting
units in order to enhance liquidity and improve its regulatory
capital ratios. If market conditions do not improve or
deteriorate further, additional goodwill impairment charges may
be recognized in future periods.
|
|
14.
|
Debt and
Development Bonds Payable
|
Certain of Cores debt facilities contain financial
covenants generally requiring certain net worth, liquidity and
loan to value ratios. Further, certain of Cores debt
facilities contain cross-default provisions under which a
default on one loan with a lender could cause a default on other
debt instruments with the same lender. If Core fails to comply
with any of these restrictions or covenants, the lenders under
the applicable debt facilities could cause Cores debt to
become due and payable prior to maturity. These accelerations or
significant re-margining payments could require Core to dedicate
a substantial portion of its cash to pay its debt and reduce its
ability to use its cash to fund its operations. If Core does not
have sufficient cash to satisfy these required payments, then
Core would need to seek to refinance the debt or obtain
alternative funds, which may not be available on attractive
terms, if at all. In the event that Core is unable to refinance
its debt or obtain additional funds, it may default on some or
all of its existing debt facilities.
The following table summarizes Woodbridges outstanding
notes and mortgage notes payable (which includes Cores
outstanding notes and mortgage notes payable) at June 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008. These notes accrue interest at
fixed rates and variable rates tied to the Prime Rate
and/or LIBOR
rate (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Maturity Date
|
|
5.50% Commercial development mortgage note payable(a)
|
|
$
|
58,262
|
|
|
|
58,262
|
|
|
June 2012
|
2.06% Commercial development mortgage note payable
|
|
|
4,696
|
|
|
|
4,724
|
|
|
June 2010
|
2.41% Commercial development mortgage note payable
|
|
|
9,041
|
|
|
|
8,919
|
|
|
July 2010
|
5.00% Land development mortgage note payable
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
February 2012
|
3.72% Land acquisition mortgage note payable
|
|
|
22,824
|
|
|
|
23,184
|
|
|
October 2019
|
6.88% Land acquisition mortgage note payable
|
|
|
4,808
|
|
|
|
4,928
|
|
|
October 2019
|
3.06% Land acquisition mortgage note payable(b)
|
|
|
86,392
|
|
|
|
86,922
|
|
|
June 2011
|
3.25% Borrowing base facility
|
|
|
37,174
|
|
|
|
37,458
|
|
|
March 2011
|
5.47% Other mortgage note payable
|
|
|
11,712
|
|
|
|
11,831
|
|
|
April 2015
|
6.00% 6.13% Development bonds
|
|
|
3,281
|
|
|
|
3,291
|
|
|
May 2035
|
6.50% 9.15% Other borrowings
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
August 2009 June 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
263,464
|
|
|
|
264,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Core has a credit agreement with a financial institution which
provides for borrowings of up to $64.3 million. The credit
agreement had an original maturity date of June 26, 2009
and a variable interest rate of
30-day LIBOR
plus 170 basis points or Prime Rate. During June 2009, the
loan agreement was modified to extend the maturity date to June
2012. The loan, as modified, bears interest at a fixed interest
rate of 5.5%. The terms of the modification also required Core
to pledge approximately 10 acres of additional collateral.
The new terms of the loan also include a debt service coverage
ratio covenant of 1.10:1 and the elimination of a loan to value
covenant. As of June 30, 2009, the loan had an outstanding
balance of $58.3 million. |
F-34
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
(b) |
|
In January of 2009, Core was advised by one of its lenders that
the lender had received an external appraisal on the land that
serves as collateral for a development mortgage note payable,
which had an outstanding balance of $86.4 million at
June 30, 2009. The appraised value would suggest the
potential for a re-margining payment to bring the note payable
back in line with the minimum
loan-to-value
requirement. The lender is conducting its internal review
procedures, including the determination of the appraised value.
As of the date of this filing, Core is in discussions with the
lender to restructure the loan which may eliminate any
re-margining requirements; however, there is no assurance that
these discussions will be successful or that re-margining
payments will not otherwise be required in the future. |
In connection with the development of certain of Cores
projects, community development, special assessment or
improvement districts have been established and may utilize
tax-exempt bond financing to fund construction or acquisition of
certain
on-site and
off-site infrastructure improvements near or at these
communities. The obligation to pay principal and interest on the
bonds issued by the districts is assigned to each parcel within
the district, and a priority assessment lien may be placed on
benefited parcels to provide security for the debt service. The
bonds, including interest and redemption premiums, if any, and
the associated priority lien on the property are typically
payable, secured and satisfied by revenues, fees, or assessments
levied on the property benefited. Core is required to pay the
revenues, fees, and assessments levied by the districts on the
properties it still owns that are benefited by the improvements.
Core may also be required to pay down a specified portion of the
bonds at the time each unit or parcel is sold. The costs of
these obligations are capitalized to inventory during the
development period and recognized as cost of sales when the
properties are sold.
Cores bond financing at June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 consisted of district bonds totaling
$218.7 million at each of these dates with outstanding
amounts of approximately $143.6 million and
$130.5 million, respectively. Further, at June 30,
2009, approximately $68.4 million were available under
these bonds to fund future development expenditures. Bond
obligations at June 30, 2009 mature in 2035 and 2040. As of
June 30, 2009, Core owned approximately 16% of the property
subject to assessments within the community development district
and approximately 91% of the property subject to assessments
within the special assessment district. During the three months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, Core recorded approximately
$158,000 and $163,000, respectively, in assessments on property
owned by it in the districts. During the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, Core recorded approximately
$317,000 and $268,000, respectively, in assessments on property
owned by it in the districts. Core is responsible for any
assessed amounts until the underlying property is sold and will
continue to be responsible for the annual assessments if the
property is never sold. In addition, Core has guaranteed
payments for assessments under the district bonds in Tradition,
Florida which would require funding if future assessments to be
allocated to property owners are insufficient to repay the
bonds. Management has evaluated this exposure based upon the
criteria in SFAS No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies, and has determined that there have been
no substantive changes to the projected density or land use in
the development subject to the bond which would make it probable
that Core would have to fund future shortfalls in assessments.
In accordance with EITF Issue
No. 91-10,
Accounting for Special Assessments and Tax Increment
Financing, Woodbridge records a liability for the
estimated developer obligations that are fixed and determinable
and user fees that are required to be paid or transferred at the
time the parcel or unit is sold to an end user. At each of
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the liability
related to developer obligations associated with Cores
ownership of the property was $3.3 million. This liability
is included in the accompanying unaudited consolidated
statements of financial condition as of June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008.
F-35
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table is a summary of the Companys
consolidated interest expense and the amounts capitalized (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
For the Six
|
|
|
|
Months Ended,
|
|
|
Months Ended,
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
25,212
|
|
|
|
38,415
|
|
|
|
54,378
|
|
|
|
85,589
|
|
Interest capitalized
|
|
|
(651
|
)
|
|
|
(3,062
|
)
|
|
|
(2,285
|
)
|
|
|
(6,250
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
$
|
24,561
|
|
|
|
35,353
|
|
|
|
52,093
|
|
|
|
79,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.
|
Woodbridge
Incentive Compensation Program
|
On September 29, 2008, Woodbridges Board of Directors
approved the terms of an incentive program for certain of
Woodbridges employees including certain of
Woodbridges executive officers, pursuant to which a
portion of their compensation will be based on the cash returns
realized by Woodbridge on its existing investments and new
investments designated by Woodbridges Board. It is
anticipated that Woodbridges investments will be held by
individual limited partnerships or other legal entities which
will be the basis for incentives granted under the programs.
Woodbridges executive officers may have interests tied
both to the performance of a particular investment as well as
interests relating to the performance of the portfolio of
investments as a whole. Woodbridge believes that the program
appropriately aligns payments to the executive officer
participants and other participating employees with the
performance of Woodbridges investments.
In accordance with SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment
(SFAS No. 123R), Woodbridge has
determined that the new executive incentive program qualifies as
a liability-based plan and, accordingly, was required to
evaluate the components of the program to determine the fair
value of the liability, if any, to be recorded. Based on its
evaluation, Woodbridge determined that the liability for
compensation under the executive compensation program as of
June 30, 2009 was not material.
|
|
17.
|
Commitments,
Contingencies and Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet
Risk
|
Commitments and financial instruments with off-balance sheet
risk consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
BFC Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guaranty agreements
|
|
$
|
36,000
|
|
|
|
38,000
|
|
Financial Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to sell fixed rate residential loans
|
|
|
45,897
|
|
|
|
25,304
|
|
Commitments to originate loans held for sale
|
|
|
38,202
|
|
|
|
21,843
|
|
Commitments to originate loans held to maturity
|
|
|
50,163
|
|
|
|
16,553
|
|
Commitments to extend credit, including the undisbursed portion
of loans in process
|
|
|
428,628
|
|
|
|
597,739
|
|
Standby letters of credit
|
|
|
16,892
|
|
|
|
20,558
|
|
Commercial lines of credit
|
|
|
68,121
|
|
|
|
66,954
|
|
Real Estate Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continued Agreement of Indemnity- surety bonds
|
|
|
17,100
|
|
|
|
19,900
|
|
F-36
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
BFC
Activities
On March 31, 2008, BFC sold its membership interests in two
of its indirect subsidiaries which owned two South Florida
shopping centers to an unaffiliated third party. In connection
with the sale of the membership interests, BFC was relieved of
its guarantee related to the loans collateralized by the
shopping centers, and BFC believes that any possible remaining
obligations are both remote and immaterial.
At June 30, 2009, a wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC,
Inc. (BFC/CCC), had a 10% interest in a limited
partnership as a non-managing general partner. The partnership
owns an office building located in Boca Raton, Florida. In
connection with the purchase of such office building in March
2006, BFC/CCC guaranteed repayment of a portion of the
non-recourse loan on the property on a joint and several basis
with the managing general partner. BFC/CCCs maximum
exposure under this guarantee agreement is $6.0 million
(which is shared on a joint and several basis with the managing
general partner), representing approximately 26.4% of the
current indebtedness of the property, with the guarantee to be
partially reduced in the future based upon the performance of
the property. In July 2009, BFC/CCCs wholly-owned
subsidiary withdrew as partner of the limited partnership and
transferred its 10% interest to another partner. In return, the
partner to whom this interest was assigned agreed to use its
reasonable best efforts to obtain the release of BFC/CCC from
the guarantee, and if the partner is unable to secure such a
release, that partner has agreed to indemnify BFC/CCCs
wholly-owned subsidiary for any losses that may arise under the
guarantee after the date of the assignment.
A wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC has a 10% interest in a
limited liability company that owns two commercial properties in
Hillsborough County, Florida. In connection with the purchase of
the commercial properties in November 2006, BFC and the
unaffiliated member each guaranteed the payment of up to a
maximum of $5.0 million each for certain environmental
indemnities and specific obligations that are not related to the
financial performance of the assets. BFC and the unaffiliated
member also entered into a cross indemnification agreement which
limits BFCs obligations under the guarantee to acts of BFC
and its affiliates. The BFC guarantee represents approximately
19.3% of the current indebtedness collateralized by the
commercial properties.
A wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC has a 50% limited partner
interest in a limited partnership that has a 10% interest in a
limited liability company that owns an office building in Tampa,
Florida. In connection with the purchase of the office building
by the limited liability company in June 2007, BFC guaranteed
the payment of certain environmental indemnities and specific
obligations that are not related to the financial performance of
the asset up to a maximum of $15.0 million, or
$25.0 million in the event of any petition or involuntary
proceedings under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or similar state
insolvency laws or in the event of any transfers of interests
not in accordance with the loan documents. BFC and the
unaffiliated members also entered into a cross indemnification
agreement which limits BFCs obligations under the
guarantee to acts of BFC and its affiliates.
There were no amounts for the obligations associated with the
above guarantees (including the transaction associated with the
transfer of BFC/CCCs wholly-owned subsidiarys 10%
ownership interest) recorded in the Companys financial
statements based on the value of the assets collateralizing the
indebtedness, the potential indemnification by unaffiliated
members and the limit of the specific obligations to
non-financial matters.
Other than these guarantees, the remaining instruments indicated
in the above table are direct commitments of BankAtlantic
Bancorp or Woodbridge.
Financial
Services
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by
BankAtlantic to guarantee the performance of a customer to a
third party. BankAtlantics standby letters of credit are
generally issued to customers in the construction industry
guaranteeing project performance. These types of standby letters
of credit had a
F-37
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
maximum exposure of $11.0 million at June 30, 2009.
BankAtlantic also issues standby letters of credit to commercial
lending customers guaranteeing the payment of goods and
services. These types of standby letters of credit had a maximum
exposure of $5.9 million at June 30, 2009. These
guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private
borrowing arrangements and have maturities of one year or less.
The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is
essentially the same as that involved in extending loan
facilities to customers. BankAtlantic may hold certificates of
deposit and residential and commercial liens as collateral for
such commitments. Included in other liabilities at June 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008 was $12,000 and $20,000,
respectively, of unearned guarantee fees. There were no
obligations associated with these guarantees recorded in the
financial statements.
Real
Estate Development
At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, Woodbridge had
outstanding surety bonds of approximately $5.4 million and
$8.2 million, respectively, which were related primarily to
its obligations to various governmental entities to construct
improvements in its various communities. Woodbridge estimates
that approximately $1.1 million of work remains to complete
these improvements and does not believe that any outstanding
surety bonds will likely be drawn upon.
Levitt and Sons had $33.3 million in surety bonds related
to its ongoing projects at the time of the filing of the
Chapter 11 Cases. In the event that these obligations are
drawn and paid by the surety, Woodbridge could be responsible
for up to $11.7 million plus costs and expenses in
accordance with the surety indemnity agreements executed by
Woodbridge. At each of June 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008, Woodbridge had $1.1 million in surety bonds accrual
related to certain bonds where management believes it to be
probable that Woodbridge will be required to reimburse the
surety under applicable indemnity agreements. Woodbridge did not
reimburse any amounts during the three months ended
June 30, 2009 and reimbursed approximately $367,000 during
the three months ended June 30, 2008 in accordance with the
indemnity agreement for bond claims paid during the period. For
the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, Woodbridge
reimbursed the surety approximately $37,000 and $532,000,
respectively. It is unclear whether and to what extent the
remaining outstanding surety bonds of Levitt and Sons will be
drawn and the extent to which Woodbridge may be responsible for
additional amounts beyond this accrual. There is no assurance
that Woodbridge will not be responsible for amounts in excess of
the $1.1 million accrual. Woodbridge will not receive any
repayment, assets or other consideration as recovery of any
amounts it may be required to pay. In September 2008, a surety
filed a lawsuit to require Woodbridge to post collateral against
a portion of its aggregate $11.7 million surety bonds
exposure relating to two bonds totaling $5.4 million after
a municipality made claims against the surety. Woodbridge
believes that the municipality does not have the right to demand
payment under the bonds and initiated a lawsuit against the
municipality. Because Woodbridge does not believe a loss is
probable, Woodbridge did not accrue any amount in connection
with this claim as of June 30, 2009. As claims have been
made on the bonds, the surety requested that Woodbridge post a
$4.0 million letter of credit as security while the matter
is litigated with the municipality and Woodbridge has complied
with that request.
At June 30, 2009, Woodbridge had $2.4 million in
unrecognized tax benefits related to FASB Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes an interpretation of FASB
No. 109 (FIN No. 48).
FIN No. 48 provides guidance for how a company should
recognize, measure, present and disclose in its financial
statements uncertain tax positions that a company has taken or
expects to take on a tax return.
F-38
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
18.
|
Redeemable
5% Cumulative Preferred Stock
|
On June 7, 2004, the Board of Directors of the Company
designated 15,000 shares of preferred stock as 5%
Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (5% Preferred
Stock) and set the relative rights, preferences and
limitations of the 5% Preferred Stock. On June 21, 2004,
the Company sold all 15,000 shares of the Preferred Stock
to an investor group in a private offering. On December 17,
2008, the Company amended Article IV of the Companys
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (the
Amendment) to change certain of the previously
designated relative rights, preferences and limitations of the
Companys 5% Preferred Stock. The Amendment eliminated the
right of the holders of the 5% Preferred Stock to convert their
shares of 5% Preferred Stock into shares of the Companys
Class A Common Stock. The Amendment also requires the
Company to redeem shares of the 5% Preferred Stock with the net
proceeds it receives in the event (i) the Company sells any
of its shares of Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock,
(ii) the Company sells any shares of Benihanas Common
Stock received upon conversion of the Benihana Convertible
Preferred Stock or (iii) Benihana redeems any shares of the
Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock owned by the Company.
Additionally, in the event the Company defaults on its
obligation to make dividend payments on the 5% Preferred Stock,
the Amendment entitles the holders of the 5% Preferred Stock, in
place of the Company, to receive directly from Benihana certain
payments on the shares of Benihanas Convertible Preferred
Stock owned by the Company or on the shares of Benihanas
Common Stock received by the Company upon conversion of
Benihanas Convertible Preferred Stock.
Effective with the Amendment in December 2008, the Company
determined that the 5% Preferred Stock met the requirements to
be re-classified outside of permanent equity at its fair value
at the Amendment date of approximately $11.0 million into
the mezzanine category as Redeemable 5% Cumulative Preferred
Stock and the remaining amount of approximately
$4.0 million remained classified in Additional Paid in
Capital in the Companys Consolidated Statements of
Financial Condition. The fair value of the 5% Preferred Stock
was obtained by using an income approach by discounting
estimated cash flows at a market discount rate.
The 5% Preferred Stock has a stated value of $1,000 per share.
The shares of 5% Preferred Stock may be redeemed at the option
of the Company, from time to time, at redemption prices (the
Redemption Price) ranging from $1,030 per share
for the year 2009 to $1,000 per share for the year 2015 and
thereafter. The 5% Preferred Stock liquidation preference is
equal to its stated value of $1,000 per share plus any
accumulated and unpaid dividends or an amount equal to the
Redemption Price in a voluntary liquidation or winding up
of the Company. Holders of the 5% Preferred Stock are entitled
to receive, when and as declared by the Companys Board of
Directors, cumulative quarterly cash dividends on each such
share at a rate per annum of 5% of the stated value from the
date of issuance, payable quarterly. Since June 2004, the
Company has paid dividends on the 5% Preferred Stock of $187,500
on a quarterly basis. The 5% Preferred Stock has no voting
rights except as required by Florida law.
|
|
19.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions
|
BFC is the controlling shareholder of BankAtlantic Bancorp and
Woodbridge. BFC also has a direct non-controlling interest in
Benihana and, through Woodbridge, an indirect ownership interest
in Bluegreen. Shares representing a majority of BFCs total
voting power are owned or controlled by the Companys
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Alan B. Levan,
and by the Companys Vice Chairman, John E. Abdo, both of
whom are also directors of the Company and Bluegreen, and
executive officers and directors of Woodbridge, BankAtlantic
Bancorp and BankAtlantic. Mr. Abdo is also Vice Chairman of
the Board of Directors of Benihana and since June 2009,
Mr. Levan also serves as director of Benihana.
F-39
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table presents BFC, BankAtlantic Bancorp,
Woodbridge and Bluegreen related party transactions at
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 and for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. Amounts
related to BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge Corporation were
eliminated in the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BFC
|
|
|
Bancorp
|
|
|
Woodbridge
|
|
|
Bluegreen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shared service income (expense)
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
$
|
849
|
|
|
|
(458
|
)
|
|
|
(255
|
)
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
Facilities cost
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
$
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
Interest income (expense) from cash balance/securities sold
under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
(b
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shared service income (expense)
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
$
|
891
|
|
|
|
(452
|
)
|
|
|
(321
|
)
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
Facilities cost
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
$
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
21
|
|
Interest income (expense) from cash balance/securities sold
under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
(b
|
)
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shared service income (expense)
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,710
|
|
|
|
(906
|
)
|
|
|
(531
|
)
|
|
|
(273
|
)
|
Facilities cost(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
31
|
|
Interest income (expense) from cash balance/securities sold
under agreements to repurchase(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shared service income (expense)
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,389
|
|
|
|
(716
|
)
|
|
|
(467
|
)
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
Facilities cost
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
$
|
(149
|
)
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
34
|
|
Interest income (expense) from cash balance/securities sold
under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
(b
|
)
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents and (securities sold under agreements
to repurchase)
|
|
|
(b
|
)
|
|
$
|
225
|
|
|
|
(6,307
|
)
|
|
|
6,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shared service receivable (payable)
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
$
|
367
|
|
|
|
(157
|
)
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents and (securities sold under agreements
to repurchase)
|
|
|
(b
|
)
|
|
$
|
263
|
|
|
|
(4,696
|
)
|
|
|
4,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shared service receivable (payable)
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
$
|
398
|
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Pursuant to the terms of shared service agreements between BFC,
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge, subsidiaries of BFC provide
shared service operations in the areas of human resources, risk
management, investor relations, executive office administration
and other services to BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge.
Additionally, BFC provides certain risk management and
administrative services to Bluegreen. The costs of shared
services are allocated based upon the usage of the respective
services. Also, as part of the shared service arrangement, BFC
pays BankAtlantic Bancorp and Bluegreen for office facilities
costs relating to BFC and its shared service operations. |
F-40
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
In May 2009, BFC and BFC Shared Service Corporation (BFC
Shared Service), a wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC, amended
the terms of the office lease agreements with BankAtlantic under
which BFC and BFC Shared Service agreed to pay BankAtlantic an
annual rent of approximately $304,000 for office space in
BankAtlantics corporate headquarters. In May 2009, BFC
also amended the terms of the office
sub-lease
agreement with Woodbridge for office space in
BankAtlantics corporate headquarters pursuant to which
Woodbridge agreed to pay BFC an annual rent of approximately
$141,000. All above mentioned lease agreements were originally
entered into in May 2008. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
BFC and Woodbridge entered into securities sold under agreements
to repurchase transactions with BankAtlantic in the aggregate of
approximately $6.3 million and $4.7 million at
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
These transactions have similar terms as BankAtlantics
agreements with unaffiliated parties. As of June 30, 2009,
BankAtlantic facilitated the placement of $51.8 million of
certificates of deposit insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (the FDIC) with other insured depository
institutions on Woodbridges behalf through the Certificate
of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS) program.
The CDARS program facilitates the placement of funds into
certificates of deposit issued by other financial institutions
in increments of less than the standard FDIC insurance maximum
to insure that both principal and interest are eligible for full
FDIC insurance coverage. At June 30, 2009,
Woodbridges placements under the CDARS program with
maturity dates of less than 3 months totaled
$1.9 million, while placements with maturity dates or more
than 3 months totaled $49.9 million. |
In March 2008, Woodbridge entered into an agreement with
BankAtlantic, pursuant to which BankAtlantic agreed to house
Woodbridges information technology servers and provide
information technology support in exchange for monthly payments
by Woodbridge to BankAtlantic. During the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, Woodbridge paid BankAtlantic
approximately $70,000 and $30,000, respectively, under this
agreement.
Woodbridge is currently working with Bluegreen to explore
avenues for assisting Bluegreen in obtaining liquidity for its
receivables, which may include, among other potential
alternatives, Woodbridge forming a broker dealer to raise
capital through private or public offerings, among other things.
Bluegreen has agreed to reimburse Woodbridge for certain
expenses, including legal and professional fees incurred in
connection with this effort. As of June 30, 2009,
Woodbridge was reimbursed approximately $602,000 from Bluegreen
and has additionally recorded a receivable of approximately
$481,000.
BankAtlantic Bancorp in prior periods issued options to purchase
shares of BankAtlantic Bancorps Class A common stock
to employees of Woodbridge prior to the spin-off of Woodbridge
to BankAtlantic Bancorps shareholders. Additionally,
certain employees of BankAtlantic Bancorp have transferred to
affiliate companies and BankAtlantic Bancorp has elected, in
accordance with the terms of BankAtlantic Bancorps stock
option plans, not to cancel the stock options held by those
former employees. BankAtlantic Bancorp accounts for these
options to former employees as employee stock options because
these individuals were employees of BankAtlantic Bancorp on the
grant date.
Outstanding options held by former employees consisted of the
following as of June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Bancorp Class A
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Options outstanding
|
|
|
53,789
|
|
|
$
|
48.46
|
|
Options non-vested
|
|
|
13,610
|
|
|
$
|
92.85
|
|
In 2007 and 2006, BankAtlantic Bancorp issued to BFC employees
that perform services for BankAtlantic Bancorp options to
acquire 9,800 and 10,060 shares of BankAtlantic
Bancorps Class A common stock at an exercise price of
$46.90 and $73.45, respectively. These options vest in five
years and expire ten years from the grant date. BankAtlantic
Bancorp recorded $12,000 and $25,000 of service provider expense
relating to
F-41
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
these options for the three and six months ended June 30,
2009, respectively, compared to $17,000 and $36,000 for the same
periods in 2008.
Certain of the Companys affiliates, including its
executive officers, have in the past independently made
investments with their own funds in both public and private
entities that the Company sponsored in 2001 and in which it
holds investments.
Florida Partners Corporation owns 133,314 shares of the
Companys Class B Common Stock and
1,270,302 shares of the Companys Class A Common
Stock. Alan B. Levan may be deemed to be controlling shareholder
with beneficial ownership of approximately 44.6% of Florida
Partners Corporation and is also a member of its Board of
Directors.
|
|
20.
|
Loss Per
Common Share
|
The Company has two classes of common stock outstanding. The
two-class method is not presented because the Companys
capital structure does not provide for different dividend rates
or other preferences, other than voting rights, between the two
classes. The number of options considered outstanding shares for
diluted earnings per share is based upon application of the
treasury stock method to the options outstanding as of the end
of the period.
The following table presents the computation of basic and
diluted earnings (loss) per common share attributable to the
Company (in thousands, except for per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
For the Six
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(39,526
|
)
|
|
|
(26,743
|
)
|
|
|
(72,759
|
)
|
|
|
(59,841
|
)
|
Less: Net Loss from continuing operations attributable to
noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
26,617
|
|
|
|
21,826
|
|
|
|
48,189
|
|
|
|
48,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to BFC
|
|
|
(12,909
|
)
|
|
|
(4,917
|
)
|
|
|
(24,570
|
)
|
|
|
(10,950
|
)
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss allocable to common stock
|
|
|
(13,096
|
)
|
|
|
(5,104
|
)
|
|
|
(24,945
|
)
|
|
|
(11,325
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations, net of taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,201
|
|
|
|
1,019
|
|
Less: Noncontrolling interests discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,943
|
)
|
|
|
(857
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations, net of taxes attributable to BFC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,258
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss allocable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(13,096
|
)
|
|
|
(5,104
|
)
|
|
|
(23,687
|
)
|
|
|
(11,163
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
45,126
|
|
|
|
45,112
|
|
|
|
45,120
|
|
|
|
45,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
(0.55
|
)
|
|
|
(0.25
|
)
|
Earnings per share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per share
|
|
$
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
(0.52
|
)
|
|
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-42
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
For the Six
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss allocable to common stock
|
|
$
|
(13,096
|
)
|
|
|
(5,104
|
)
|
|
|
(24,945
|
)
|
|
|
(11,325
|
)
|
Effect of securities issuable by subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss allocable to common stock after assumed dilution
|
|
$
|
(13,096
|
)
|
|
|
(5,104
|
)
|
|
|
(24,945
|
)
|
|
|
(11,325
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations, net of taxes attributable to BFC
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,258
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
Effect of securities issuable by subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,258
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss allocable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(13,096
|
)
|
|
|
(5,104
|
)
|
|
|
(23,687
|
)
|
|
|
(11,163
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
45,126
|
|
|
|
45,112
|
|
|
|
45,120
|
|
|
|
45,108
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock options and unvested restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
45,126
|
|
|
|
45,112
|
|
|
|
45,120
|
|
|
|
45,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
(0.55
|
)
|
|
|
(0.25
|
)
|
Earnings (loss) per share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per share
|
|
$
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
(0.52
|
)
|
|
|
(0.25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
1,777,729 and 1,619,686, respectively, and during the six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, 1,777,729 and 1,615,294
respectively, of options to acquire shares of Class A
Common Stock were anti-dilutive.
|
|
21.
|
Parent
Company Financial Information
|
BFCs parent company accounting policies are generally the
same as those described in the summary of significant accounting
policies appearing in the Companys audited consolidated
financial statements and footnotes thereto included below. The
Companys investments in BankAtlantic Bancorp, Woodbridge
and the Companys wholly-owned subsidiaries and venture
partnerships are presented in the parent company financial
statements as if accounted for using the equity method of
accounting.
F-43
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
BFCs parent company unaudited condensed statements of
financial condition at June 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008, unaudited condensed statements of operations for the three
and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 and
unaudited condensed statements of cash flows for six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are shown below (in thousands):
Parent
Company Condensed Statements of Financial Condition
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
5,921
|
|
|
|
9,218
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
20,598
|
|
|
|
16,523
|
|
Investment in venture partnerships
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
Investment in BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc.
|
|
|
43,742
|
|
|
|
66,326
|
|
Investment in Woodbridge Holdings Corporation
|
|
|
41,120
|
|
|
|
35,575
|
|
Investment in and advances to wholly owned subsidiaries
|
|
|
2,241
|
|
|
|
2,323
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
835
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
115,220
|
|
|
|
131,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances from and negative basis in wholly owned subsidiaries
|
|
$
|
798
|
|
|
|
789
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
6,866
|
|
|
|
6,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
7,664
|
|
|
|
7,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable 5% Cumulative Preferred Stock
|
|
|
11,029
|
|
|
|
11,029
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
96,527
|
|
|
|
112,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
115,220
|
|
|
|
131,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent
Company Condensed Statements of Operations
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three
|
|
|
For the Six
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
333
|
|
|
|
615
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
1,137
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
2,012
|
|
|
|
2,169
|
|
|
|
4,035
|
|
|
|
4,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) before earnings (loss) from subsidiaries
|
|
|
(1,679
|
)
|
|
|
(1,554
|
)
|
|
|
(3,419
|
)
|
|
|
(3,676
|
)
|
Equity in loss from BankAtlantic Bancorp
|
|
|
(11,464
|
)
|
|
|
(4,557
|
)
|
|
|
(24,823
|
)
|
|
|
(10,342
|
)
|
Equity in earnings (loss) from Woodbridge
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
(1,783
|
)
|
|
|
3,771
|
|
|
|
(3,861
|
)
|
Equity in earnings (loss) from other subsidiaries
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(203
|
)
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(12,909
|
)
|
|
|
(8,097
|
)
|
|
|
(24,570
|
)
|
|
|
(17,996
|
)
|
Benefit from income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(12,909
|
)
|
|
|
(4,917
|
)
|
|
|
(24,570
|
)
|
|
|
(10,950
|
)
|
Discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,258
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to BFC
|
|
|
(12,909
|
)
|
|
|
(4,917
|
)
|
|
|
(23,312
|
)
|
|
|
(10,788
|
)
|
5% Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss allocable to common stock
|
|
$
|
(13,096
|
)
|
|
|
(5,104
|
)
|
|
|
(23,687
|
)
|
|
|
(11,163
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-44
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Parent
Company Statements of Cash Flow Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Six
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
$
|
(3,006
|
)
|
|
|
(3,754
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution from partnership
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by in investing activities
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends paid
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(3,297
|
)
|
|
|
(3,596
|
)
|
Cash at beginning of period
|
|
|
9,218
|
|
|
|
17,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of period
|
|
$
|
5,921
|
|
|
|
14,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary disclosure of non-cash investing and financing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in shareholders equity from the
effect of subsidiaries capital transactions, net of income
taxes
|
|
$
|
732
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
Increase (decrease) increase in accumulated other comprehensive
income, net of taxes
|
|
|
5,696
|
|
|
|
(1,651
|
)
|
Net increase in shareholders equity resulting from the
cumulative impact of accounting changes recognized by Bluegreen
on retained interests in notes receivable
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends received from subsidiaries for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were $84,000 and $132,000,
respectively.
|
|
22.
|
New
Accounting Pronouncements
|
Effective July 1, 2009, the FASB issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 168
(SFAS 168), The FASB Accounting Standards
Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles a replacement of FASB Statement
No. 162 (ASC) became the single official
source of authoritative, nongovernmental GAAP. The historical
GAAP hierarchy was eliminated and the ASC became the only level
of authoritative GAAP, other than guidance issued by the SEC.
All other literature became non-authoritative. ASC is effective
for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods
ending after September 15, 2009. The Company does not
expect the adoption of SFAS 168 to have an impact on its
consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation
No. 46(R) (SFAS 167). This statement
amends certain requirements of FASB Interpretation No. 46
(revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities. Among other accounting and disclosure
requirements, SFAS 167 replaces the quantitative-based
risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise
has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest
entity with an approach focused on identifying which enterprise
has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest
entity and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the
right to receive benefits from the entity. SFAS 167 will be
F-45
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2010. The
Company is currently evaluating the effect that adoption of this
standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial
Assets, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140
(SFAS 166). This statement increases the
information that a reporting entity provides in its financial
reports about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a
transfer on its statement of financial condition, financial
performance and cash flows; and a continuing interest in
transferred financial assets. In addition, SFAS 166 amends
various concepts addressed by FASB Statement No. 140,
Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets
and Extinguishments of Liabilities a replacement of
FASB Statement No. 125, including removing the concept
of qualified special purpose entities. SFAS 166 must be
applied to transfers occurring on or after the effective date.
SFAS 166 will be effective for the Company beginning
January 1, 2010. The Company is currently evaluating the
effect that adoption of this standard will have on its
consolidated financial statements.
Class Action
Litigation
On January 25, 2008, plaintiff Robert D. Dance filed a
purported class action complaint as a putative purchaser of
Woodbridges securities against Woodbridge and certain of
its officers and directors, asserting claims under the federal
securities law and seeking damages. This action was filed in the
United States District Court for the Southern District of
Florida and is captioned Dance v. Levitt Corp. et al.,
No. 08-CV-60111-DLG.
The securities litigation purports to be brought on behalf of
all purchasers of Woodbridges securities beginning on
January 31, 2007 and ending on August 14, 2007. The
complaint alleges that the defendants violated
Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and
Rule 10b-5
promulgated thereunder by issuing a series of false
and/or
misleading statements concerning Woodbridges financial
results, prospects and condition. Woodbridge intends to
vigorously defend this action.
Surety
Bond Claim
In September 2008, a surety filed a lawsuit to require
Woodbridge to post $5.4 million of collateral relating to
two bonds totaling $5.4 million after a municipality made
claims against the surety. Woodbridge believes that the
municipality does not have the right to demand payment under the
bonds and initiated a lawsuit against the municipality. Because
Woodbridge does not believe a loss is probable, Woodbridge did
not accrue any amount related to this claim as of June 30,
2009. As claims have been made on the bonds, the surety
requested Woodbridge post a $4.0 million letter of credit
as security while the matter is litigated with the municipality
and Woodbridge has complied with that request.
General
Litigation
In the ordinary course of business, the Company and its
subsidiaries are parties to lawsuits as plaintiff or defendant
involving its bank operations, lending, tax certificates
activities and real estate development activities. Although the
Company and its subsidiaries believe it has meritorious defenses
in all current legal actions, the outcome of the various legal
actions is uncertain. The Company does not believe that the
ultimate resolution of these claims or lawsuits will have a
material adverse effect on its business, financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
|
|
24.
|
Bankruptcy
of Levitt and Sons
|
As described in Note 1 above, on November 9, 2007, the
Debtors filed the Chapter 11 Cases. The Debtors commenced
the Chapter 11 Cases in order to preserve the value of
their assets and to facilitate an orderly wind-down of their
businesses and disposition of their assets in a manner intended
to maximize the
F-46
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
recoveries of all constituents. In connection with the filing of
the Chapter 11 Cases, Woodbridge deconsolidated Levitt and
Sons as of November 9, 2007. As a result of the
deconsolidation, Woodbridge had a negative basis in its
investment in Levitt and Sons because Levitt and Sons generated
significant losses and intercompany liabilities in excess of its
asset balances. This negative investment, Loss in excess
of Woodbridges investment in subsidiary, was
reflected as a single amount on the Companys consolidated
statements of financial condition as a $55.2 million
liability as of December 31, 2008. This balance was
comprised of a negative investment in Levitt and Sons of
$123.0 million and outstanding advances due to Woodbridge
from Levitt and Sons of $67.8 million. Included in the
negative investment was approximately $15.8 million
associated with deferred revenue related to intra-segment sales
between Levitt and Sons and Core Communities. During the fourth
quarter of 2008, Woodbridge identified approximately
$2.3 million of deferred revenue on intercompany sales
between Core and Carolina Oak that had been misclassified
against the negative investment in Levitt and Sons. As a result,
Woodbridge recorded a $2.3 million reclassification in the
fourth quarter of 2008 between inventory of real estate and the
loss in excess of investment in subsidiary in the consolidated
statements of financial condition. As a result, as of
December 31, 2008, the net negative investment was
$52.9 million.
On June 27, 2008, Woodbridge entered into a settlement
agreement (the Settlement Agreement) with the
Debtors and the Joint Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the
Joint Committee) appointed in the Chapter 11
Cases. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, among other things,
(i) Woodbridge agreed to pay to the Debtors
bankruptcy estates the sum of $12.5 million plus accrued
interest from May 22, 2008 through the date of payment,
(ii) Woodbridge agreed to waive and release substantially
all of the claims it had against the Debtors, including its
administrative expense claims through July 2008, and
(iii) the Debtors (joined by the Joint Committee) agreed to
waive and release any claims they had against Woodbridge and its
affiliates. After certain of Levitt and Sons creditors
indicated that they objected to the terms of the Settlement
Agreement and stated a desire to pursue claims against
Woodbridge, Woodbridge, the Debtors and the Joint Committee
entered into an amendment to the Settlement Agreement, pursuant
to which Woodbridge would, in lieu of the $12.5 million
payment previously agreed to, pay $8 million to the
Debtors bankruptcy estates and place $4.5 million in
a release fund to be disbursed to third party creditors in
exchange for a third party release and injunction. The amendment
also provided for an additional $300,000 payment by Woodbridge
to a deposit holders fund. The Settlement Agreement, as amended,
was subject to a number of conditions, including the approval of
the Bankruptcy Court.
As previously reported, on February 20, 2009, the
Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming a plan of
liquidation jointly proposed by Levitt and Sons and the Joint
Committee and approved the settlement pursuant to the Settlement
Agreement, as amended. No appeal for rehearing of the Bankruptcy
Courts order was timely filed by any party, and the
settlement was consummated on March 3, 2009, at which time,
payment was made in accordance with the terms and conditions of
the Settlement Agreement, as amended. Under cost method
accounting, the cost of settlement and the related
$52.9 million liability (less $500,000 which was determined
as the settlement holdback and remained as an accrual pursuant
to the Settlement Agreement, as amended) was recognized into
income in the quarter ended March 31, 2009, resulting in a
$40.4 million gain on settlement of investment in
subsidiary. As a result, Woodbridge no longer holds an
investment in this subsidiary.
Merger
Agreement with Woodbridge
On July 2, 2009, the Company entered into a definitive
merger agreement with Woodbridge. Subject to the terms and
conditions of the agreement, Woodbridge will become a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and the holders of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock (other than BFC)
will receive 3.47 shares of BFCs Class A Common
Stock for each share of Woodbridges Class A Common
Stock they hold at the
F-47
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
effective time of the merger. BFC currently owns approximately
22% of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock and all of
Woodbridges Class B Common Stock, representing
approximately 59% of the total voting power of Woodbridge. The
shares of Woodbridges common stock held by BFC will be
canceled in the merger.
The consummation of the merger is subject to a number of
customary closing conditions, including the approval of both
BFCs and Woodbridges shareholders. The companies
currently expect to consummate the merger during the third
quarter of 2009. If the merger is consummated, Woodbridges
separate corporate existence will cease and its Class A
Common Stock will no longer be publicly traded.
Additional
Pizza Fusion Investment
On July 2, 2009, Woodbridge exercised its option to
purchase 521,740 shares of Series B Preferred Stock of
Pizza Fusion at a price of $1.15 per share, or an aggregate
purchase price of $600,000. Upon the exercise of the option,
Woodbridge was also granted warrants to purchase up to 300,000
additional shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
of Pizza Fusion at an exercise price of $1.44 per share. The
warrants have a term of 10 years, subject to earlier
expiration under certain circumstances.
F-48
Report of
Independent Registered Certified Public Accounting
Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
BFC Financial Corporation
In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of other
auditors, the accompanying consolidated statements of financial
condition and the related consolidated statements of operations,
of comprehensive income (loss), of shareholders equity and
of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of BFC Financial Corporation and its
subsidiaries (the Company) at December 31, 2008
and 2007, and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2008 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our
opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). The Companys management is responsible
for these financial statements, for maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment
of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, included in Managements Report on Internal
Control over Financial Reporting (not presented herein)
appearing under Item 9A of the Companys annual report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008. Our responsibility is
to express opinions on these financial statements and on the
Companys internal control over financial reporting based
on our integrated audits. We did not audit the financial
statements of Bluegreen Corporation, an approximate
31 percent-owned equity investment of the Company which
reflects a net investment totaling $115.1 million and
$116.0 million at December 31, 2008 (prior to an
other-than-temporary impairment recorded by the Company, net of
amortization of basis difference, of $85.3 million) and
2007, respectively, and equity in the net earnings (loss) of
approximately $(154,000) (prior to the amortization of basis
difference of $13.9 million), $10.3 million and
$9.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006, respectively. The financial statements of
Bluegreen Corporation were audited by other auditors whose
report thereon has been furnished to us, and our opinion on the
financial statements expressed herein, insofar as it relates to
the amounts included for Bluegreen Corporation, is based solely
on the report of the other auditors. We conducted our audits in
accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement and whether effective internal control over
financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our
audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal
control over financial reporting included obtaining an
understanding of internal control over financial reporting,
assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of
internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also
included performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits and
the report of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our
opinions.
As discussed in Notes 1 and 39 to the consolidated
financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it
accounts for noncontrolling interests effective January 1,
2009.
As discussed in Notes 1, 30 and 37, on November 9,
2007 (the Petition Date), Levitt and Sons, LLC
(Levitt and Sons) and substantially all of its
subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for relief under
Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code in
the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of
Florida. As a result, Levitt and Sons was deconsolidated from
Woodbridge Holdings Corporation (formerly Levitt Corporation), a
subsidiary of the Company, as of the Petition Date and has been
prospectively reported as a cost method investment. On the
Petition Date, Levitt and Sons had total assets of approximately
$373 million, total liabilities of $480 million, and a
net shareholders deficit of $107 million.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. Managements
assessment and our audit
F-49
of BFC Financial Corporations internal control over
financial reporting also included controls over the preparation
of financial statements in accordance with the instructions to
the Consolidated Financial Statements for Savings and Loan
Holding Companies (OTS
Form H-(b)
11) to comply with the reporting requirements of
Section 112 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Improvement Act (FDICIA). A companys internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that
(i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in
reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;
(ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
March 31, 2009, except with respect to our opinion on the
consolidated financial statements insofar as it relates to the
effects of the change in accounting for noncontrolling interests
discussed in Notes 1 and 39, as to which the date is
July 17, 2009.
F-50
BFC
Financial Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
247,760
|
|
|
|
326,524
|
|
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments
|
|
|
31,177
|
|
|
|
5,631
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
21,288
|
|
|
|
2,207
|
|
Securities available for sale and other financial instruments
(at fair value)
|
|
|
722,698
|
|
|
|
926,307
|
|
Financial instruments accounted for at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,661
|
|
Investment securities at cost or amortized costs (fair value:
$12,475 and $65,244)
|
|
|
12,008
|
|
|
|
60,173
|
|
Tax certificates, net of allowance of $6,064 in 2008 and $3,289
in 2007
|
|
|
213,534
|
|
|
|
188,401
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost which approximates fair
value
|
|
|
54,607
|
|
|
|
74,003
|
|
Residential loans held for sale at lower of cost or fair value
|
|
|
3,461
|
|
|
|
4,087
|
|
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses of $137,257
in 2008 and $94,020 in 2007
|
|
|
4,314,184
|
|
|
|
4,524,451
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
41,817
|
|
|
|
46,271
|
|
Real estate held for development and sale
|
|
|
268,763
|
|
|
|
270,229
|
|
Real estate owned
|
|
|
19,045
|
|
|
|
17,216
|
|
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
41,386
|
|
|
|
128,321
|
|
Properties and equipment, net
|
|
|
315,347
|
|
|
|
360,889
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
20,782
|
|
|
|
70,490
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
24,204
|
|
|
|
5,396
|
|
Deferred tax asset, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,330
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
43,521
|
|
|
|
76,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
6,395,582
|
|
|
|
7,114,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing
|
|
$
|
3,184,677
|
|
|
|
3,129,194
|
|
Non-interest bearing
|
|
|
741,691
|
|
|
|
824,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
3,926,368
|
|
|
|
3,953,405
|
|
Advances from FHLB
|
|
|
967,491
|
|
|
|
1,397,044
|
|
Federal funds purchased and other short term borrowings
|
|
|
238,339
|
|
|
|
108,975
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
41,387
|
|
|
|
50,930
|
|
Subordinated debentures, mortgage notes payable and
mortgage-backed bonds
|
|
|
287,772
|
|
|
|
295,421
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
376,104
|
|
|
|
379,223
|
|
Loss in excess of investment in Woodbridges subsidiary
|
|
|
52,887
|
|
|
|
55,214
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
118,784
|
|
|
|
131,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
6,009,132
|
|
|
|
6,371,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable 5% Cumulative Preferred Stock
$.01 par value; authorized 15,000 shares; issued and
outstanding 15,000 shares in 2008 and 0 in 2007, with a
redemption value of $1,000 per share (See Note 34)
|
|
|
11,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-51
BFC
Financial Corporation
Consolidated
Statements of Financial
Condition (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock of $.01 par value; authorized
10,000,000 shares; 5% Cumulative Convertible Preferred
Stock (5% Preferred Stock) authorized 15,000 shares; issued
and outstanding 0 shares in 2008 and 15,000 shares in
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock of $.01 par value, authorized
70,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 38,254,389 in
2008 and 38,232,932 in 2007
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
Class B common stock of $.01 par value, authorized
20,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 6,875,104 in 2008
and 6,876,081 in 2007
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
123,562
|
|
|
|
131,189
|
|
(Accumulated deficit) retained earnings
|
|
|
(8,848
|
)
|
|
|
50,801
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
|
(2,298
|
)
|
|
|
1,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total BFC Financial Corporation (BFC)
shareholders equity
|
|
|
112,867
|
|
|
|
184,037
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
262,554
|
|
|
|
558,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
375,421
|
|
|
|
742,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
6,395,582
|
|
|
|
7,114,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-52
BFC
Financial Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BFC Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
$
|
1,368
|
|
|
|
2,335
|
|
|
|
2,249
|
|
Securities activities, net
|
|
|
898
|
|
|
|
1,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
2,142
|
|
|
|
2,479
|
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,408
|
|
|
|
6,109
|
|
|
|
3,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
|
314,538
|
|
|
|
371,633
|
|
|
|
367,177
|
|
Service charges on deposits
|
|
|
93,905
|
|
|
|
102,639
|
|
|
|
90,472
|
|
Other service charges and fees
|
|
|
28,959
|
|
|
|
28,950
|
|
|
|
27,542
|
|
Securities activities, net
|
|
|
2,039
|
|
|
|
8,412
|
|
|
|
9,813
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
10,130
|
|
|
|
9,159
|
|
|
|
12,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
449,571
|
|
|
|
520,793
|
|
|
|
507,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Development:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of real estate
|
|
|
13,837
|
|
|
|
410,115
|
|
|
|
566,086
|
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
|
3,192
|
|
|
|
3,936
|
|
|
|
2,474
|
|
Securities activities, net
|
|
|
1,178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
15,284
|
|
|
|
17,614
|
|
|
|
14,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,491
|
|
|
|
431,665
|
|
|
|
583,152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
487,470
|
|
|
|
958,567
|
|
|
|
1,094,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BFC Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee compensation and benefits
|
|
|
8,793
|
|
|
|
10,932
|
|
|
|
9,407
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
3,346
|
|
|
|
4,083
|
|
|
|
2,963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,139
|
|
|
|
15,015
|
|
|
|
12,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net of interest capitalized
|
|
|
140,502
|
|
|
|
192,672
|
|
|
|
166,578
|
|
Provision for (recovery of) loan losses
|
|
|
159,801
|
|
|
|
70,842
|
|
|
|
8,574
|
|
Employee compensation and benefits
|
|
|
128,897
|
|
|
|
151,178
|
|
|
|
150,804
|
|
Occupancy and equipment
|
|
|
64,782
|
|
|
|
65,851
|
|
|
|
57,308
|
|
Advertising and promotion
|
|
|
16,335
|
|
|
|
20,002
|
|
|
|
35,067
|
|
Cost associated with debt redemption
|
|
|
1,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
Provision for tax certificates
|
|
|
7,286
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
Restructuring charges and exit activities
|
|
|
7,395
|
|
|
|
8,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
46,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of real estate held for sale
|
|
|
1,169
|
|
|
|
5,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of real estate owned
|
|
|
1,465
|
|
|
|
7,299
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
59,536
|
|
|
|
57,723
|
|
|
|
54,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
634,970
|
|
|
|
579,458
|
|
|
|
474,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-53
BFC
Financial Corporation
Consolidated
Statements of Operations (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Real Estate Development:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales of real estate
|
|
|
12,838
|
|
|
|
573,241
|
|
|
|
482,961
|
|
Interest expense, net of interest capitalized
|
|
|
10,667
|
|
|
|
3,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
49,246
|
|
|
|
116,918
|
|
|
|
120,017
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,929
|
|
|
|
3,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,751
|
|
|
|
697,895
|
|
|
|
606,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
719,860
|
|
|
|
1,292,368
|
|
|
|
1,093,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
15,064
|
|
|
|
12,724
|
|
|
|
10,935
|
|
Impairment of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(96,579
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of investments
|
|
|
(15,548
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(329,453
|
)
|
|
|
(321,077
|
)
|
|
|
12,179
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
15,763
|
|
|
|
(69,012
|
)
|
|
|
(530
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations
|
|
|
(345,216
|
)
|
|
|
(252,065
|
)
|
|
|
12,709
|
|
Discontinued operations, less income tax provision (benefit) of
$0 in 2008, $(3,471) in 2007 and $(8,957) in 2006
|
|
|
16,605
|
|
|
|
7,160
|
|
|
|
(10,535
|
)
|
Extraordinary gain, less income tax of $0 in 2008 and $1,509 in
2007
|
|
|
9,145
|
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(319,466
|
)
|
|
|
(242,502
|
)
|
|
|
2,174
|
|
Less: Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(260,567
|
)
|
|
|
(212,043
|
)
|
|
|
4,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to BFC
|
|
|
(58,899
|
)
|
|
|
(30,459
|
)
|
|
|
(2,221
|
)
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss allocable to common stock
|
|
$
|
(59,649
|
)
|
|
|
(31,209
|
)
|
|
|
(2,971
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) earnings per common share attributable to BFC (See
Note 33):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per share from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(1.62
|
)
|
|
|
(0.90
|
)
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
Basic earnings per share from extraordinary gain
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per share
|
|
$
|
(1.32
|
)
|
|
|
(0.81
|
)
|
|
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per share from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(1.62
|
)
|
|
|
(0.90
|
)
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
Diluted earnings per share from extraordinary gain
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per share
|
|
$
|
(1.32
|
)
|
|
|
(0.81
|
)
|
|
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
45,097
|
|
|
|
38,778
|
|
|
|
33,249
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of common and common equivalent
shares outstanding
|
|
|
45,097
|
|
|
|
38,778
|
|
|
|
33,249
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-54
BFC
Financial Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(319,466
|
)
|
|
|
(242,502
|
)
|
|
|
2,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (loss) on securities available for sale
|
|
|
(14,576
|
)
|
|
|
17,754
|
|
|
|
15,763
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(6,647
|
)
|
|
|
7,599
|
|
|
|
6,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (loss) on securities available for sale, net of
tax
|
|
|
(7,929
|
)
|
|
|
10,155
|
|
|
|
9,538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unfunded pension liability
|
|
|
(13,911
|
)
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
2,989
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
2,112
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unfunded pension liability, net of tax
|
|
|
(16,023
|
)
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
1,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (losses) gains associated with investment in
unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(2,021
|
)
|
|
|
(771
|
)
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(184
|
)
|
|
|
(340
|
)
|
|
|
537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (losses) gains associated with investment in
unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax
|
|
|
(1,837
|
)
|
|
|
(431
|
)
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized net periodic pension income (costs)
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
(366
|
)
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized net periodic pension income (costs), net of tax
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
(179
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized (gains) loss reclassified into net loss
|
|
|
10,502
|
|
|
|
(8,814
|
)
|
|
|
(9,809
|
)
|
Benefit for Income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,710
|
)
|
|
|
(3,877
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized (gains) loss reclassified into net loss, net of tax
|
|
|
10,502
|
|
|
|
(5,104
|
)
|
|
|
(5,932
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
|
|
|
(15,039
|
)
|
|
|
5,146
|
|
|
|
5,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
|
(334,505
|
)
|
|
|
(237,356
|
)
|
|
|
7,788
|
|
Less: Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling
interest
|
|
|
(271,712
|
)
|
|
|
(207,042
|
)
|
|
|
9,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss attributable to BFC
|
|
$
|
(62,793
|
)
|
|
|
(30,314
|
)
|
|
|
(1,295
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-55
BFC
Financial Corporation
For each
of the years in the three year period ended December 31,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compen-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sation
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Compre-
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
hensive
|
|
|
BFC
|
|
|
controlling
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
Interest in
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Grants
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005
|
|
|
29,950
|
|
|
|
4,285
|
|
|
$
|
278
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
97,223
|
|
|
$
|
(100
|
)
|
|
$
|
85,113
|
|
|
$
|
525
|
|
|
$
|
183,080
|
|
|
$
|
696,522
|
|
|
$
|
879,602
|
|
Cumulative effect adjustment upon adoption of Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 108 (SAB No. 108)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(253
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(253
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(253
|
)
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,221
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,221
|
)
|
|
|
4,395
|
|
|
|
2,174
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
926
|
|
|
|
926
|
|
|
|
4,688
|
|
|
|
5,614
|
|
Issuance of Common Stock, upon exercise of stock options
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
3,929
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
9,076
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,116
|
|
Retirement of Common Stock relating to exercise of stock options
|
|
|
(1,279
|
)
|
|
|
(1,068
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(13,246
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,270
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,270
|
)
|
Net effect of subsidiaries capital transactions, net of
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
Noncontrolling interests net effect of subsidiaries
capital transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,282
|
)
|
|
|
(7,282
|
)
|
Cash dividends on preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
Share-based compensation related to stock options and restricted
stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
973
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
973
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
973
|
|
Reversal of unamortized stock compensation related to restricted
stock upon adoption of FAS 123 ( R)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer of shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006
|
|
|
28,756
|
|
|
|
7,091
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
93,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,889
|
|
|
|
1,451
|
|
|
|
177,585
|
|
|
|
698,323
|
|
|
|
875,908
|
|
Cumulative effect adjustment upon adoption of FASB
Interpretation No. 48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,459
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,459
|
)
|
|
|
(212,043
|
)
|
|
|
(242,502
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income, net of taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
5,001
|
|
|
|
5,146
|
|
Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs
|
|
|
11,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,121
|
|
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options and
restricted stock
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
Cancelled shares of common stock upon merger. (See notes 32
and 33)
|
|
|
(2,163
|
)
|
|
|
(227
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net effect of subsidiaries capital transactions, net of
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
Noncontrolling interests net effect of subsidiaries
capital transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,669
|
|
|
|
67,669
|
|
Cash dividends on preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
Share-based compensation related to stock options and restricted
stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,187
|
|
Transfer of shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
38,233
|
|
|
|
6,876
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
131,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,801
|
|
|
|
1,596
|
|
|
|
184,037
|
|
|
|
558,950
|
|
|
|
742,987
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58,899
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58,899
|
)
|
|
|
(260,567
|
)
|
|
|
(319,466
|
)
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,894
|
)
|
|
|
(3,894
|
)
|
|
|
(11,145
|
)
|
|
|
(15,039
|
)
|
Issuance of restricted Class A Common Stock
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfer of shares of Common Stock
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase and retirement of Class A Common Stock
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
Net effect of subsidiaries capital transactions, net of
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,398
|
|
Noncontrolling interests net effect of subsidiaries
capital transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,684
|
)
|
|
|
(24,684
|
)
|
Cash dividends on preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
Re-classification of the 5% Preferred Stock to Redeemable
Preferred stock (see Note 34)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,029
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,029
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,029
|
)
|
Share-based compensation related to stock options and restricted
stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
38,254
|
|
|
|
6,875
|
|
|
$
|
382
|
|
|
$
|
69
|
|
|
$
|
123,562
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(8,848
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,298
|
)
|
|
$
|
112,867
|
|
|
$
|
262,554
|
|
|
$
|
375,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-56
BFC
Financial Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(319,466
|
)
|
|
|
(242,502
|
)
|
|
|
2,174
|
|
Adjustment to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extraordinary gain, net of taxes
|
|
|
(9,145
|
)
|
|
|
(2,403
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(12,144
|
)
|
|
|
(6,122
|
)
|
|
|
9,011
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
168,552
|
|
|
|
78,441
|
|
|
|
8,883
|
|
Restructuring charges, impairments and exit activities
|
|
|
8,564
|
|
|
|
13,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of inventory and long lived assets
|
|
|
3,605
|
|
|
|
227,412
|
|
|
|
38,328
|
|
Cumulative effect adjustment before noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
(1,899
|
)
|
Depreciation, amortization and accretion, net
|
|
|
28,389
|
|
|
|
23,693
|
|
|
|
31,845
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
3,821
|
|
|
|
9,386
|
|
|
|
9,291
|
|
Tax benefits from share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,265
|
)
|
|
|
(3,719
|
)
|
Securities activities, net
|
|
|
(4,116
|
)
|
|
|
(9,707
|
)
|
|
|
(9,795
|
)
|
Net losses (gains) on sales of real estate owned, loans and
office properties and equipment
|
|
|
(2,448
|
)
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
(5,079
|
)
|
Net gain on sale of Ryan Beck Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,175
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Originations and repayments of loans held for sale, net
|
|
|
(59,323
|
)
|
|
|
(90,745
|
)
|
|
|
(93,887
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale
|
|
|
53,564
|
|
|
|
96,470
|
|
|
|
87,793
|
|
Equity in earnings from Bluegreen
|
|
|
(13,696
|
)
|
|
|
(10,275
|
)
|
|
|
(9,445
|
)
|
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(323
|
)
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
96,579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of investments
|
|
|
15,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
46,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
50,260
|
|
|
|
(44,024
|
)
|
|
|
(20,625
|
)
|
Net losses (gains) associated with debt redemption
|
|
|
1,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
Increase in forgivable notes receivable, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(673
|
)
|
|
|
(6,111
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in real estate held for development
and sale
|
|
|
(8,582
|
)
|
|
|
27,006
|
|
|
|
(259,629
|
)
|
(Increase) decrease in securities owned, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,855
|
)
|
|
|
67,910
|
|
Increase (decrease) securities sold but not yet purchased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,419
|
|
|
|
(3,770
|
)
|
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
4,454
|
|
|
|
1,405
|
|
|
|
(6,183
|
)
|
Decrease (increase) in other assets
|
|
|
15,584
|
|
|
|
(12,204
|
)
|
|
|
(6,465
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in due to clearing agent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,657
|
|
|
|
(40,115
|
)
|
Decrease in customer deposits
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
(23,974
|
)
|
|
|
(8,990
|
)
|
Decrease in other liabilities
|
|
|
(30,858
|
)
|
|
|
(45,712
|
)
|
|
|
(21,058
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
36,498
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
(241,606
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from redemption and maturity of investment securities
and tax certificates
|
|
$
|
349,397
|
|
|
|
208,345
|
|
|
|
199,482
|
|
Purchase of investment securities and tax certificates
|
|
|
(377,983
|
)
|
|
|
(211,402
|
)
|
|
|
(236,962
|
)
|
Purchase of securities available for sale
|
|
|
(288,241
|
)
|
|
|
(682,231
|
)
|
|
|
(143,272
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales and maturities of securities available for
sale
|
|
|
541,381
|
|
|
|
719,898
|
|
|
|
181,444
|
|
F-57
BFC
Financial Corporation
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash
|
|
|
(19,081
|
)
|
|
|
(1,576
|
)
|
|
|
651
|
|
Purchases of FHLB stock
|
|
|
(47,655
|
)
|
|
|
(22,725
|
)
|
|
|
(49,950
|
)
|
Redemption of FHLB stock
|
|
|
67,051
|
|
|
|
28,939
|
|
|
|
39,664
|
|
Distributions from unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
3,189
|
|
|
|
8,186
|
|
|
|
5,303
|
|
Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(6,863
|
)
|
|
|
(10,323
|
)
|
Net repayments (purchases and originations) of loans
|
|
|
23,285
|
|
|
|
(2,173
|
)
|
|
|
(106,123
|
)
|
Proceeds from the sale of loans receivable
|
|
|
10,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to real estate owned
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(2,011
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of real estate owned
|
|
|
3,810
|
|
|
|
2,252
|
|
|
|
4,382
|
|
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment
|
|
|
6,693
|
|
|
|
969
|
|
|
|
2,055
|
|
Purchases of office property and equipment, net
|
|
|
(12,648
|
)
|
|
|
(103,033
|
)
|
|
|
(121,680
|
)
|
Net cash outflows from the sale of Central Florida stores
|
|
|
(4,491
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities received from Ryan Beck Holdings, Inc. earnout
|
|
|
(11,309
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deconsolidation of Woodbridges subsidiary cash balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,387
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from the sale of Ryan Beck Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition in Pizza Fusion Class B preferred shares
|
|
|
(3,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of BankAtlantic Bancorp Class A shares
|
|
|
(3,925
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Woodbridge Class A shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,205
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
$
|
236,488
|
|
|
|
(100,389
|
)
|
|
|
(235,329
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in deposits
|
|
$
|
(3,482
|
)
|
|
|
86,369
|
|
|
|
114,360
|
|
Prepayments of FHLB advances
|
|
|
(694,363
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds (repayments) of FHLB advances
|
|
|
262,808
|
|
|
|
(120,000
|
)
|
|
|
233,656
|
|
Net decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
(9,543
|
)
|
|
|
(45,456
|
)
|
|
|
(13,403
|
)
|
Net increase (decrease) in federal funds purchased
|
|
|
129,364
|
|
|
|
76,949
|
|
|
|
(107,449
|
)
|
Repayments of secured borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,516
|
)
|
Prepayment of notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
(2,751
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
(32,055
|
)
|
|
|
(162,213
|
)
|
|
|
(216,891
|
)
|
Proceeds from notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
27,522
|
|
|
|
236,839
|
|
|
|
384,732
|
|
Issuance of junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,929
|
|
|
|
30,928
|
|
Payments for debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(518
|
)
|
|
|
(1,695
|
)
|
|
|
(3,043
|
)
|
Capital contributions in managed fund by investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,905
|
|
Capital withdrawals in managed fund by investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,203
|
)
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,265
|
|
|
|
3,719
|
|
Proceeds from the issuance of BFC Class A Common Stock, net
of issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividends paid
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
Purchase and retirement of Class A common stock
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase and retirement of Woodbridge common stock
|
|
|
(1,439
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase and retirement of BankAtlantic Bancorp Class A
common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,769
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
F-58
BFC
Financial Corporation
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Proceeds from the issuance of Woodbridge Class A common
stock, net of issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of the minimum withholding tax upon the exercise of
stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,871
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of BankAtlantic Bancorp Class A
common stock
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
2,449
|
|
|
|
1,479
|
|
Purchase of subsidiary common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,833
|
)
|
BankAtlantic Bancorp common stock dividends paid to non-BFC
shareholders
|
|
|
(636
|
)
|
|
|
(5,746
|
)
|
|
|
(7,592
|
)
|
Woodbridge common stock dividends paid to non-BFC shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(330
|
)
|
|
|
(1,322
|
)
|
Distribution from venture partnership to minority holders
|
|
|
(410
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(326,204
|
)
|
|
|
233,800
|
|
|
|
375,906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(53,218
|
)
|
|
|
134,041
|
|
|
|
(101,029
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
332,155
|
|
|
|
201,123
|
|
|
|
305,437
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents of discontinued assets held for sale
at disposal date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,294
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents of discontinued assets held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,285
|
|
|
|
(3,285
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
278,937
|
|
|
|
332,155
|
|
|
|
201,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on borrowings and deposits
|
|
$
|
153,168
|
|
|
|
197,157
|
|
|
|
167,430
|
|
Income taxes (refunded) paid
|
|
|
(44,100
|
)
|
|
|
5,409
|
|
|
|
39,770
|
|
Supplementary disclosure of non-cash investing and financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and tax certificates transferred to REO
|
|
|
7,208
|
|
|
|
2,528
|
|
|
|
23,728
|
|
Securities held-to-maturity transferred to securities available
for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets held-for-use transferred to assets held for
sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities purchased pending settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,926
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in additional paid in capital from the
re-classification of the 5% Preferred Stock to Redeemable
Preferred stock (see Note 34)
|
|
|
11,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in inventory from the reclassification to to property
and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,859
|
|
|
|
8,412
|
|
Reduction in loan participations sold accounted for as secured
borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,754
|
|
Exchange branch facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,350
|
|
Increase (decrease) in accumulated other comprehensive income,
net of taxes
|
|
|
(3,894
|
)
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
926
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in shareholders equity from the
effect of subsidiaries capital transactions, net of taxes
|
|
|
2,398
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
F-59
BFC
Financial Corporation
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Issuance and retirement of BFC Class A Common Stock
accepted as consideration for the exercise price of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,154
|
|
Increase in deferred tax liability due to cumulative impact of
change in accounting for uncertainties in income taxes
(FIN 48 see Note 25)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-60
BFC
Financial Corporation
|
|
1.
|
Organization
and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Organization
and Business
BFC Financial Corporation (BFC or the
Company) is a diversified holding company whose
major holdings include controlling interests in BankAtlantic
Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries
(BankAtlantic Bancorp) and Woodbridge Holdings
Corporation (formerly Levitt Corporation) and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries (Woodbridge) and a noncontrolling
interest in Benihana, Inc. (Benihana), which
operates Asian-themed restaurant chains in the United States. As
a result of the Companys position as the controlling
shareholder of BankAtlantic Bancorp, BFC is a unitary
savings bank holding company regulated by the Office of
Thrift Supervision (OTS).
As a holding company with controlling positions in BankAtlantic
Bancorp and Woodbridge, BFC is required under generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) to consolidate the
financial results of these companies. As a consequence, the
financial information of both entities is presented on a
consolidated basis in BFCs financial statements. However,
except as otherwise noted, the debts and obligations of
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge are not direct obligations
of BFC and are non-recourse to BFC. Similarly, the assets of
those entities are not available to BFC absent its pro rata
share in a dividend or distribution.
In September 2008, BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge each
completed a one-for-five reverse split of its common stock.
Where appropriate, amounts throughout this document have been
adjusted to reflect the reverse stock splits effected by
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge. The reverse stock splits
did not impact the Companys proportionate equity interest
or voting rights in BankAtlantic Bancorp or Woodbridge.
BFCs ownership in BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge as
of December 31, 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Percent of
|
|
of
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Vote
|
|
BankAtlantic Bancorp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock(1)
|
|
|
2,389,697
|
|
|
|
23.30
|
%
|
|
|
12.35
|
%
|
Class B Common Stock
|
|
|
975,225
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
47.00
|
%
|
Total
|
|
|
3,364,922
|
|
|
|
29.96
|
%
|
|
|
59.35
|
%
|
Woodbridge Holdings Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock(2)
|
|
|
3,735,392
|
|
|
|
22.43
|
%
|
|
|
11.89
|
%
|
Class B Common Stock
|
|
|
243,807
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
47.00
|
%
|
Total
|
|
|
3,979,199
|
|
|
|
23.55
|
%
|
|
|
58.89
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In August 2008 and December 2008, BFC purchased an aggregate of
400,000 shares and 323,848 shares, respectively, of
BankAtlantic Bancorps Class A common stock on the
open market for an aggregate purchase price of $2.8 million
and $1.1 million, respectively. BFCs August 2008 and
December 2008 acquisitions of BankAtlantic Bancorps
Class A common stock increased BFCs ownership
interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp by approximately 3.6% in August
2008 and 2.9% in December 2008 and increased BFCs voting
interest by approximately 2.1% in August 2008 and 1.6% in
December 2008. The acquisitions of additional shares of
BankAtlantic Bancorp have been accounted for as step
acquisitions under the purchase method of accounting. See
Note 2 for further information. |
|
(2) |
|
BFCs percentage of vote includes 1,229,117 shares of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock which BFC had
previously agreed not to vote (except in limited circumstances)
pursuant to a letter agreement requested by Woodbridge in
connection with the listing of its shares on the NYSE. |
On December 1, 2008, the Company was notified by the NYSE
Arca, Inc. that its Class A Common Stock was suspended from
trading on the NYSE Arca because the market value of its
publicly held shares had fallen below the NYSE Arcas
continued listing requirement for a consecutive 30
trading-day
period. As a
F-61
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
result, the Companys Class A Common Stock was
suspended from trading on the NYSE Arca prior to the opening of
the market on December 9, 2008. Since, December 9,
2008, BFCs Class A Common Stock is quoted on the Pink
Sheets Electronic Quotation Service (Pink Sheets)
under the ticker symbol BFCF.PK.
BankAtlantic Bancorp is a unitary savings bank holding company
organized under the laws of the State of Florida. BankAtlantic
Bancorps principal asset is its investment in BankAtlantic
and its subsidiaries. BankAtlantic was founded in 1952 and is a
federally-chartered, federally-insured savings bank
headquartered in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. At
December 31, 2008, BankAtlantic operated through a network
of over 100 branches located in Florida. BankAtlantic is a
community-oriented bank which provides traditional retail
banking services and a wide range of commercial banking products
and related financial services.
On February 28, 2007, BankAtlantic Bancorp completed the
sale to Stifel Financial Corp. (Stifel) of Ryan Beck
Holdings, Inc. (Ryan Beck), a subsidiary of
BankAtlantic Bancorp engaged in retail and institutional
brokerage and investment banking. As a consequence, the results
of operations of Ryan Beck are presented as Discontinued
Operations in the consolidated statements of operations.
Woodbridge historically has been engaged in real estate
development activities in the Southeastern United States.
While Woodbridges operations were primarily within the
real estate industry, Woodbridges current business
strategy includes the pursuit of investments and acquisitions
within or outside of the real estate industry, as well as the
continued development of master-planned communities.
In 2008, Woodbridge engaged in business activities through the
Land Division, consisting of the operations of Core Communities,
LLC (Core Communities or Core), which
develops master-planned communities, and through the Woodbridge
Other Operations segment (Woodbridge Other
Operations), which includes the other operations of
Woodbridge, such as the consolidated operations of Pizza Fusion
Holdings, Inc. (Pizza Fusion), the consolidated
operations of Carolina Oak Homes, LLC (Carolina
Oak), which engaged in homebuilding in South Carolina
prior to the suspension of those activities during the fourth
quarter of 2008, and other investment activities through Cypress
Creek Capital Holdings, LLC (Cypress Creek Capital)
and Snapper Creek Equity Management, LLC (Snapper
Creek). An equity investment in Bluegreen Corporation
(Bluegreen) and an investment in Office Depot, Inc.
(Office Depot) are also included in the Woodbridge
Other Operations segment.
In October 2007, Woodbridge acquired from Levitt and Sons all of
the outstanding membership interests in Carolina Oak for the
following consideration: (i) the assumption of the
outstanding principal balance of a loan in the amount of
$34.1 million which is collateralized by a 150 acre
parcel of land owned by Carolina Oak located in Tradition Hilton
Head, (ii) the execution of a promissory note in the amount
of $400,000 to serve as a deposit under a purchase agreement
between Carolina Oak and Core Communities of South Carolina, LLC
and (iii) the assumption of specified payables in the
amount of approximately $5.3 million. The principal asset
of Carolina Oak is a 150 acre parcel of land located in
Tradition Hilton Head.
Prior to November 9, 2007, Woodbridge also conducted
homebuilding operations through Levitt and Sons, LLC
(Levitt and Sons), which comprised Woodbridges
Homebuilding Division. The Homebuilding Division consisted of
two reportable operating segments, the Primary Homebuilding
segment and the Tennessee Homebuilding segment. Acquired in
December 1999, Levitt and Sons was a developer of single family
homes and townhome communities for active adults and families in
Florida, Georgia, Tennessee and South Carolina. On
November 9, 2007 (the Petition Date), Levitt
and Sons and substantially all of its subsidiaries
(collectively, the Debtors) filed voluntary
petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of
the United States Code (the Chapter 11 Cases)
in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District
of Florida ( the Bankruptcy Court). In connection
with the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases, Woodbridge
deconsolidated Levitt and Sons as of November 9, 2007,
eliminating all future operations of Levitt and Sons from
Woodbridges financial results of operations. Since Levitt
and Sons results are no longer consolidated and Woodbridge
believes that it is not probable that it will be obligated to
fund future operating losses at
F-62
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Levitt and Sons, any adjustments reflected in Levitt and
Sons financial statements subsequent to November 9,
2007 are not expected to affect the results of operations of
Woodbridge.
Liquidity
Except as otherwise noted, the debts and obligations of
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge are not direct obligations
of BFC and are non-recourse to BFC. Similarly, the assets of
those entities are not available to BFC absent its pro rata
share in a dividend or distribution. During the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, BFC has incurred
operating cash flow deficits which have been financed with
available working capital. BFC expects to meet its short-term
liquidity requirements generally through existing cash balances
and cash dividends from Benihana. The Company anticipates that
it will meet its long-term liquidity needs through long-term
secured and unsecured indebtedness, future issuances of equity
and/or debt
securities, and, if necessary, the sale of assets. However,
current economic and financial market conditions and the
Companys recent delisting from the NYSE could make it more
difficult for BFC to obtain financing or raise capital.
BankAtlantics liquidity depends on its ability to maintain
or increase deposit levels and availability under its lines of
credit, federal funds, Treasury and Federal Reserve programs.
Additionally, interest rate changes or disruptions in the
capital markets may make terms of the borrowings and deposits
less favorable. As a result, there is a risk that
BankAtlantics cost of fundings will increase. As of
December 31, 2008, BankAtlantic had available unused
borrowings of approximately $1.0 billion in connection with
its FHLB line of credit, federal funds lines, and Treasury and
Federal Reserve programs. However, such available borrowings are
subject to periodic reviews and may be terminated or limited at
any time.
As of December 31, 2008, BankAtlantic was considered a
well capitalized institution with actual capital
amounts and ratios exceeding all well capitalized
amounts and ratios. However, the OTS, at its discretion can at
any time require an institution to maintain capital amounts and
ratios above the established well capitalized
requirements based on its view of the risk profile of the
specific institution. If higher capital requirements are
imposed, BankAtlantic could be required to raise additional
capital. There is no assurance that BankAtlantic will continue
to be deemed well capitalized, that additional
capital will not be necessary, or that BankAtlantic would be
successful in raising additional capital in subsequent periods.
An inability to raise capital or to maintain well
capitalized status could have a material adverse impact on
BankAtlantic Bancorps and BFCs financial condition
and results.
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
The accounting policies applied by the Company conform to
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
Use of Estimates In preparing the financial
statements, management is required to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
as of the date of the statements of financial condition and
operations for the periods presented. Actual results could
differ significantly from those estimates. Material estimates
that are particularly susceptible to significant change relate
to the determination of the allowance for loan losses,
evaluation of goodwill, intangible and long-lived assets for
impairment, valuation of securities, evaluation of securities
for impairment and other-than-temporary declines in value, the
valuation of real estate acquired in connection with foreclosure
or in satisfaction of loans, revenue recognition on percent
complete projects, determination of the valuation of real estate
assets and impairment, estimated costs to complete construction,
the valuation of the fair value of assets and liabilities in the
application of the purchase method of accounting, the current
tax liability in accordance with FIN 48, the amount of the
deferred tax asset valuation allowance, accounting for uncertain
tax positions, contingencies and litigation, and accounting for
share-based compensation.
F-63
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Consolidation Policy The consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its
wholly-owned subsidiaries, all of the accounts in which the
Company has a controlling voting interest, including
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge, and Variable Interest
Entities (VIEs) required to be consolidated in
accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) revised Interpretation No. 46
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
(FIN No. 46), or has controlling interest
in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Position
78-9
Accounting for Investments in Real Estate
Ventures
(SOP 78-9)
and Emerging Issues Task Force
No. 04-5
Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General
Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar
Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights
(EITF
No. 04-5).
Levitt and Sons is no longer a consolidated entity as described
below. No gains and losses are recorded on the issuance of the
Companys subsidiaries common stock. All significant
inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated
among consolidated entities.
In connection with the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases,
Woodbridge deconsolidated Levitt and Sons as of November 9,
2007, eliminating all future operations of Levitt and Sons from
its financial results of operations, and, as described above,
Woodbridge accounts for any remaining investment in Levitt and
Sons as a cost method investment.
In 2008, Woodbridge, through its wholly-owned subsidiary,
Woodbridge Equity Fund II LP, made a $3 million
investment in Pizza Fusion. Pizza Fusion was determined to be a
VIE under the provisions of FIN No. 46(R) and
Woodbridge Equity Fund II, LP was determined to be the
primary beneficiary, therefore, Woodbridge consolidated Pizza
Fusion into its consolidated financial statements as of
September 18, 2008.
In the ordinary course of its business, Woodbridge has entered
into contracts to purchase land held for development, including
option contracts. Option contracts allow Woodbridge to control
significant positions with minimal capital investment and
substantially reduce the risks associated with land ownership
and development. The liability for nonperformance under such
contracts is typically only the required non-refundable
deposits, but Woodbridge does not have legal title to these
assets. However, if certain conditions are met, under the
requirements of FIN No. 46(R), Woodbridges
non-refundable deposits in these land contracts may create a
variable interest, with Woodbridge being identified as the
primary beneficiary. If these conditions are met,
FIN No. 46(R) requires Woodbridge to consolidate VIEs
holding the asset to be acquired at its fair value. At
December 31, 2008 and 2007, there were no non-refundable
deposits under contracts, and in place to acquire land.
Reclassifications Certain amounts for prior
years have been reclassified to conform to classifications used
in 2008.
In June 2007, Core Communities began soliciting bids from
several potential buyers to purchase assets associated with two
of Cores commercial leasing projects (the
Projects). As the criteria for assets held for sale
had been met in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets (SFAS No. 144), the
assets were reclassified to assets held for sale and the
liabilities related to those assets were reclassified to
liabilities related to assets held for sale in prior periods.
The results of operations for these assets were reclassified as
discontinued operations in the third quarter of 2007 and
Woodbridge ceased recording depreciation expense on these
Projects. During the fourth quarter of 2008, Woodbridge
determined that given the difficulty in predicting the timing or
probability of a sale of the assets associated with the Projects
as a result of, among other things, the economic downturn and
disruptions in credit markets, the requirements of
SFAS No. 144 necessary to classify these assets as
held for sale and to be included in discontinued operations were
no longer met and Woodbridge could not assert the Projects can
be sold within a year. Therefore, the results of operations for
these Projects were reclassified for the three years ending
December 31, 2008 back into continuing operations in the
consolidated statements of operations. In accordance with
SFAS No. 144, Woodbridge recorded a depreciation
recapture of $3.2 million at December 31, 2008 to
account for the depreciation not recorded while the assets were
classified as discontinued operations. Woodbridge compared
F-64
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
the net carrying amount of the asset, after taking into account
the adjustment for depreciation recapture, to the fair value at
the date of the subsequent decision not to sell and determined
that the adjusted net carrying value was less than the fair
value on the date of the reclassification. Total assets and
liabilities related to the Projects were $92.8 million and
$76.1 million, respectively, for the year ended
December 31, 2008 and $96.3 million and
$80.1 million, respectively, for the year ended
December 31, 2007. In addition, total revenues related to
the Projects for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007
and 2006 were $8.7 million, $4.7 million and
$1.8 million, respectively, while income (loss), net of
noncontrolling interest, related to the Projects for the same
period in 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $761,000, $201,000 and
$(1,000), respectively.
Loss in excess of investment in Levitt and Sons
Under Accounting Research Bulletin
(ARB) No. 51 Consolidated Financial
Statements (ARB No. 51),
consolidation of a majority-owned subsidiary is precluded where
control does not rest with the majority owners. Under these
rules, legal reorganization or bankruptcy represents conditions
which can preclude consolidation or equity method accounting as
control rests with the bankruptcy court, rather than the
majority owner. As described elsewhere herein, Levitt and Sons,
our wholly-owned subsidiary, declared bankruptcy on
November 9, 2007. Therefore, in accordance with ARB
No. 51, Woodbridge deconsolidated Levitt and Sons as of
November 9, 2007, eliminating all future operations of
Levitt and Sons from Woodbridges financial results of
operations, and Woodbridge now follows the cost method of
accounting to record its interest in Levitt and Sons. Under cost
method accounting, income will only be recognized to the extent
of cash received in the future or when Levitt and Sons is
legally released from its bankruptcy obligations through the
approval of the Bankruptcy Court, at which time, any recorded
loss in excess of the investment in Levitt and Sons can be
recognized into income. (See Notes 30 and 37 for further
information regarding Levitt and Sons and the Chapter 11
Cases).
Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash equivalents
consist of cash, demand deposits at financial institutions
(other than BankAtlantic), federal funds sold, securities
purchased under resell agreements, money market funds and other
short-term investments with original maturities of 90 days
or less. Federal funds sold are generally sold for
one-day
periods, and securities purchased under resell agreements are
settled in less than 30 days. Cash and cash equivalents are
held at various financial institutions and exceed federally
insured amounts, however the Company has not experienced any
losses on such accounts and management does not believe these
concentrations to be a credit risk to the Company.
Restricted Cash Cash and interest bearing
deposits are segregated into restricted accounts for specific
uses in accordance with the terms of certain land sale
contracts, home sales and other sales agreements. Restricted
funds may be utilized in accordance with the terms of the
applicable governing documents. The majority of restricted funds
are controlled by third-party escrow fiduciaries and include the
amounts reserved under the Levitt and Sons Settlement Agreement.
Investment Securities at Cost or Amortized Costs
SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, requires
the Company to designate its securities as held to maturity,
available for sale, or trading, depending on the Companys
intent with regard to its investments at the time of purchase.
Debt securities that management has both the intent and ability
to hold to maturity are classified as securities
held-to-maturity and are stated at cost, net of unamortized
premiums and unaccreted discounts. Certificate of deposits
investments with original maturities of greater than three
months and remaining maturities of less than one year are
included in Investment Securities in the Companys
consolidated statements of financial condition.
Debt securities not held to maturity and marketable equity
securities not accounted for under the equity method of
accounting are classified as available for sale and are recorded
at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses, after applicable
taxes, resulting from changes in fair value are recorded as a
component of other comprehensive income (loss). Declines in the
fair value of specific held to maturity and available for sale
securities that are considered other-than-temporary result in
write-downs that are recorded to securities activities, net in
the Companys consolidated statements of operations. The
review for other-than-temporary
F-65
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
declines takes into account the length of time and the extent to
which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial
condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and the intent
and ability of the Company to retain the investment for a period
of time sufficient to allow for recovery.
Securities acquired for short-term appreciation or other trading
purposes are classified as trading securities and are recorded
at fair value. Realized and unrealized gains and losses
resulting from such fair value adjustments and from recording
the results of sales are recorded in securities activities, net.
Equity securities that do not have readily determinable fair
values are carried at historical cost. These securities are
evaluated for other-than-temporary declines in value, and, if
impaired, the historical cost of the securities is reduced to
its estimated fair value and the impairment is recognized.
Interest on securities, including the amortization of premiums
and the accretion of discounts, is reported in interest income
using the interest method over the lives of the securities,
adjusted for actual prepayments. Gains and losses on the sale of
securities are recorded on the trade date and recognized using
the specific identification method and reported in securities
activities, net.
Financial instruments and derivatives All
derivatives are recognized on the consolidated statement of
financial condition at their fair value with realized and
unrealized gains and losses resulting from fair value
adjustments recorded in securities activities, net in the
consolidated statement of operations. If the Company elects
hedge accounting, the hedging instrument must be highly
effective in achieving offsetting changes in the hedge
instrument and hedged item attributable to the risk being
hedged. Any ineffectiveness which arises during the hedging
relationship is recognized in earnings in the Companys
consolidated statements of operations. When it is determined
that a derivative is not highly effective as a hedge or that it
has ceased to be a highly effective hedge, the Company
discontinues hedge accounting prospectively. Financial
instruments represent warrants to acquire Stifel Common Stock
and are accounted for as derivatives. There were no derivatives
outstanding as of December 31, 2008.
Tax Certificates Tax certificates represent a
priority lien against real property for which assessed real
estate taxes are delinquent. Tax certificates are carried at
cost less allowance for tax certificates losses.
Allowance for Tax Certificate Losses The
allowance represents managements estimate of incurred
losses in the portfolio that are probable and subject to
reasonable estimation. In establishing its allowance for tax
certificate losses, management considers past loss experience,
present indicators, such as the length of time the certificate
has been outstanding, economic conditions and collateral values.
Tax certificates and resulting deeds are classified as
non-accrual when a tax certificate is 24 to 60 months
delinquent, depending on the municipality, from the acquisition
date. At that time, interest ceases to be accrued. The provision
to record the allowance is included in other expenses.
Loans Loans that management has the intent
and ability to hold for the foreseeable future, or until
maturity or payoff, are reported at their outstanding principal
balances net of any unearned income, unamortized deferred fees
or costs, premiums or discounts and an allowance for loan
losses. Loan origination fees and direct loan origination costs
are deferred and recognized in interest income over the
estimated life of the loans using the interest method, adjusted
for actual prepayments.
Loans Held for Sale Loans held for sale are
reported at the lower of aggregate cost or estimated fair value
based on current market prices for similar loans. Loan
origination fees and related direct loan origination costs on
originated loans held for sale and premiums and discounts on
purchased loans held for sale are deferred until the related
loan is sold and included in gains and losses upon sale.
Transfer of Loan Participations BankAtlantic
transfers participation rights in certain commercial real estate
loans with servicing retained. These participation rights
transfers are accounted for as loan sales when the transferred
asset has been isolated from BankAtlantic and beyond the reach
of BankAtlantics creditors, the transferees right to
pledge or exchange the loan is not constrained and BankAtlantic
does not have control
F-66
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
over the loan. If the above criteria are not met, BankAtlantic
accounts for the loan participation rights transfers as a
secured borrowing.
Impaired Loans Loans are considered impaired
when, based on current information and events, it is probable
that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due
according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. For a
loan that has been restructured, the contractual terms of the
loan agreement refer to the contractual terms specified by the
original loan agreement, not the contractual terms specified by
the restructuring agreement.
Allowance for Loan Losses The allowance for
loan losses reflects managements estimate of probable
incurred credit losses in the loan portfolios. The allowance is
the amount considered adequate to absorb losses inherent in the
loan portfolio based on managements evaluation of credit
risk as of period end. Loans are charged off against the
allowance when management believes the loan is not collectible.
Recoveries are credited to the allowance.
The allowance consists of two components. The first component of
the allowance is for non-homogenous loans that are
individually evaluated for impairment. The process for
identifying loans to be evaluated individually for impairment is
based on managements identification of classified loans.
Once an individual loan is found to be impaired, an evaluation
is performed to determine if a specific reserve needs to be
assigned to the loan based on one of the following three
methods: (1) present value of expected future cash flows,
(2) fair value of collateral less costs to sell if the loan
is collateral dependent, or (3) observable market price.
The second component of the allowance is for homogenous
loans in which groups of loans with common characteristics
are evaluated to estimate the inherent losses in the portfolio.
Management of BankAtlantic segregates homogenous loans into
groups with certain common characteristics so as to form a basis
for estimating losses as it relates to the group. The allowance
for homogenous loans has a quantitative amount and a qualitative
amount. The methodology for the quantitative component is based
on charge-off history by loan type adjusted by an expected
recovery rate. A reasonable time frame is selected for
charge-off history in order to track a loans performance
from the event of loss through the recovery period. The
methodology for the qualitative component is determined by
considering the following factors: (1) delinquency and
charge-off levels and trends; (2) problem loans and
non-accrual levels and trends; (3) lending policy and
underwriting procedures; (4) lending management and staff;
(5) nature and volume of portfolio; (6) economic and
business conditions; (7) concentration of credit;
(8) quality of loan review system; and (9) external
factors. Based on an analysis of the above factors, a
qualitative amount is assigned to each loan product.
Non-performing Loans A loan is generally
placed on non-accrual status at the earlier of (i) the loan
becoming past due 90 days as to either principal or
interest or (ii) when the borrower has entered bankruptcy
proceedings and the loan is delinquent. Exceptions to placing
90-day past
due loans on non-accrual may be made if there exists well
secured collateral and the loan is in the process of collection.
Loans are placed on non-accrual or charged-off at an earlier
date if collection of principal or interest is considered
doubtful. A loan may be placed on non-accrual status due to
material deterioration of conditions surrounding the repayment
sources, which could include insufficient borrower capacity to
service the debt, delayed property sales or development
schedules, declining loan-to-value of the loans collateral
or other factors causing the full payment of the loans
principal and interest to be in doubt. Accordingly, the Company
may place a loan on non-accrual status even where payments of
principal or interest are not currently in default. When a loan
is placed on non-accrual status, interest accrued but not
received is reversed against interest income. A non-accrual loan
may be restored to accrual status when delinquent loan payments
are collected and the loan is expected to perform in the future
according to its contractual terms. Interest income on
performing impaired loans is recognized on an accrual basis and
the cost-recovery method is used for cash receipts on
non-accrual loans without specific reserves. Interest income on
non-accrual loans with specific reserves is recognized on a cash
basis.
F-67
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Consumer non-mortgage loans that are 120 days past due are
charged off. Real estate secured consumer and residential loans
that are 120 days past due are charged down to the
collaterals fair value less estimated selling costs.
Real Estate Owned (REO) REO is
recorded at the lower of cost or estimated fair value, less
estimated selling costs when acquired. Write-downs required at
the time of acquisition are charged to the allowance for loan
losses or allowance for tax certificates. Expenditures for
capital improvements are generally capitalized. Real estate
acquired in settlement of loans or tax certificates is
anticipated to be sold and valuation allowance adjustments are
made to reflect any subsequent declines in fair values. The
costs of holding REO are charged to operations as incurred.
Provisions and reversals in the REO valuation allowance are
reflected in operations.
Impairment of Long Lived Assets Long-lived
assets consist of real estate inventory, property and equipment
and other amortizable intangible assets. In accordance with
SFAS No. 144, long-lived assets are reviewed for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a
comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated
undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the
asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated
future undiscounted cash flows, an impairment charge is
recognized in an amount by which the carrying amount of the
asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.
For projects representing land investments where homebuilding
activity had not yet begun, valuation models are used as the
best evidence of fair value and as the basis for the
measurement. If the calculated project fair value is lower than
the carrying value of the real estate inventory, an impairment
charge is recognized to reduce the carrying value of the project
to fair value.
The assumptions developed and used by management to evaluate
impairment are subjective and involve significant estimates, and
are subject to increased volatility due to the uncertainty of
the current market environment. As a result, actual results
could differ materially from managements assumptions and
estimates and may result in material inventory impairment
charges in the future.
Long-lived assets to be abandoned are considered held and used
until disposed. The carrying value of a long-lived asset to be
abandoned is depreciated over its shortened depreciable life
when the Company commits to a plan to abandon the asset before
the end of its previously estimated useful life. An impairment
loss is recognized at the date a long-lived asset is exchanged
for a similar productive asset if the carrying amount of the
asset exceeds its fair value. Long-lived assets classified as
held for sale are reported at the lower of its carrying amount
or fair value less estimated selling costs and depreciation
(amortization) ceases.
Equity Method The Company follows the equity
method of accounting to record its interests in entities in
which it does not own the majority of the voting stock and to
record its investment in VIEs in which it is not the primary
beneficiary. These entities consist of Bluegreen Corporation,
joint ventures and statutory business trusts. The statutory
business trusts are VIEs in which the Company is not the primary
beneficiary. Under the equity method, the initial investment in
a joint venture is recorded at cost and is subsequently adjusted
to recognize the Companys share of the joint
ventures earnings or losses. Distributions received and
other-than temporary impairments reduce the carrying amount of
the investment.
The Company reviews its equity and cost method investments
quarterly for indicators of other-than-temporary impairment in
accordance with accordance with FSP
FAS 115-1/FAS 124-1,
The Meaning of Other-than-Temporary Impairment and Its
Application to Certain Investments (FSP
FAS 115-1/FAS 124-1),
and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 59
(SAB No. 59). This determination requires
significant judgment in which the Company evaluates, among other
factors, the fair market value of the investments, general
market conditions, the duration and extent to which the fair
value of the investment is less than cost, and the
Companys intent and ability to hold the investment until
it recovers. The Company also considers specific adverse
conditions related to the financial health of and business
outlook
F-68
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
for the investee, including industry and sector performance,
rating agency actions, changes in operational and financing cash
flow factors. If a decline in the fair value of the investment
is determined to be other-than-temporary, an impairment charge
is recorded to reduce the investment to its fair value and a new
cost basis in the investment is established.
Capitalized Interest Interest incurred
relating to land under development and construction is
capitalized to real estate inventory or property and equipment
during the active development period. For inventory, interest is
capitalized at the effective rates paid on borrowings during the
pre-construction and planning stages and the periods that
projects are under development. Capitalization of interest is
discontinued if development ceases at a project. Capitalized
interest is expensed as a component of cost of sales as related
homes, land and units are sold. For property and equipment under
construction, interest associated with these assets is
capitalized as incurred to property and equipment and is
expensed through depreciation once the asset is put into use.
Properties and Equipment Properties and
equipment consists primarily of office properties, leasehold
improvements, furniture and fixtures, equipment and computer
software and water treatment and irrigation facilities, and are
carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. Land is carried
at cost. Depreciation is primarily computed on the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which
generally range up to 50 years for water and irrigation
facilities, 40 years for buildings and 3 to 10 years
for equipment. The cost of leasehold improvements is amortized
using the straight-line method over the shorter of the terms of
the related leases or the useful lives of the assets. Interest
expense associated with the construction of certain fixed assets
is capitalized as incurred and relieved to expense through
depreciation once the asset is put into use. Direct costs
associated with development of internal-use software are
capitalized and amortized over 3 to 5 years. In cases where
the Company determines that land and the related development
costs are to be used as fixed assets, these costs are
transferred from inventory of real estate to property and
equipment. For fixed assets that are under construction,
interest associated with these assets is capitalized as incurred
and will be relieved to expense through depreciation once the
asset is put into use.
Expenditures for new properties, leasehold improvements and
equipment and major renewals and betterments are capitalized.
Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as
incurred, and gains or losses on disposal of assets are
reflected in current operations.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets Goodwill
acquired in a purchase business combination and determined to
have an indefinite useful life is not amortized, but instead
tested for impairment at least annually or at interim periods if
events occur subsequent to the annual test date that would
result in a decline in the fair value of the reporting units.
Goodwill testing is a two-step process. The first step of the
goodwill impairment test is used to identify potential
impairment. This step compares the fair value of the reporting
unit with its carrying value. If the fair value of the reporting
unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is considered not
impaired and the second step of the impairment test is not
necessary. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than
the carrying value, then the second step of the test is used to
measure the amount of goodwill impairment, if any, in the
reporting unit. This step compares the current implied goodwill
in the reporting unit to its carrying amount. If the carrying
amount of the goodwill exceeds the implied goodwill, impairment
is recorded for the excess. The implied goodwill is determined
in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a
business combination is determined.
Other intangible assets consist of core deposit intangible
assets which were initially recorded at fair value and then
amortized on an accelerated basis over a useful life of seven to
ten years. In 2008, core deposit intangible increased
approximately $14.5 million as a result of BFCs
acquisition of additional shares in assets of BankAtlantic
Bancorp which was accounted as a step acquisition under the
purchase method. See Note 2 for further information. The
accumulated amortization on core deposit intangible assets was
$11.7 million and $9.7 million at December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
F-69
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Other intangible assets also include Woodbridges
intangible assets related to its investment in Pizza Fusion.
Intangible assets consisted of franchise contracts which were
valued using a discounted cash flows methodology and are
amortized over the average life of the franchise contracts. The
estimates of useful lives and expected cash flows require
Woodbridge to make significant judgments regarding future
periods that are subject to outside factors. In accordance with
SFAS No. 144, Woodbridge evaluates when events and
circumstances indicate that assets may be impaired and when the
undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those
assets are less than their carrying amounts. The carrying value
of these assets is dependent upon estimates of future earnings
that Woodbridge expects to generate. If cash flows decrease
significantly, intangible assets may be impaired and would be
written down to their fair value.
Revenue Recognition-Real Estate Development
Revenue and all related costs and expenses from
house and land sales are recognized at the time that closing has
occurred, when title and possession of the property and the
risks and rewards of ownership transfer to the buyer, and when
there is no substantial continuing involvement in accordance
with SFAS No. 66, Accounting for Sales of
Real Estate (SFAS No. 66). In
order to properly match revenues with expenses, Woodbridge
estimates construction and land development costs incurred and
to be incurred, but not paid at the time of closing. Estimated
costs to complete are determined for each closed home and land
sale based upon historical data with respect to similar product
types and geographical areas and allocated to closings along
with actual costs incurred based on a relative sales value
approach. To the extent the estimated costs to complete have
significantly changed, Woodbridge will adjust cost of sales in
the current period for the impact on cost of sales of previously
sold homes and land to ensure a consistent margin of sales is
maintained.
Revenue is recognized for certain land sales on the
percentage-of-completion method when the land sale takes place
prior to all contracted work being completed. Pursuant to the
requirements of SFAS No. 66, if the seller has some
continuing involvement with the property and does not transfer
substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership, profit
shall be recognized by a method determined by the nature and
extent of the sellers continuing involvement. In the case
of land sales, this involvement typically consists of final
development activities. Woodbridge recognizes revenue and
related costs as work progresses using the percentage of
completion method, which relies on estimates of total expected
costs to complete required work. Revenue is recognized in
proportion to the percentage of total costs incurred in relation
to estimated total costs at the time of sale. Actual revenues
and costs to complete construction in the future could differ
from current estimates. If the estimates of development costs
remaining to be completed and relative sales values are
significantly different from actual amounts, then the revenues,
related cumulative profits and costs of sales may be revised in
the period that estimates change.
Other revenues consist primarily of rental property income,
marketing revenues, irrigation service fees, and title and
mortgage revenue. Irrigation service connection fees are
deferred and recognized systematically over the life of the
irrigation plant. Irrigation usage fees are recognized when
billed as the service is performed. Rental property income
consists of rent revenue from long-term leases of commercial
property. The Company reviews all new leases in accordance with
SFAS No. 13 Accounting for Leases.
If the lease contains fixed escalations for rent, free-rent
periods or upfront incentives, rental revenue is recognized on a
straight-line basis over the life of the lease.
Effective January 1, 2006, Bluegreen adopted AICPA
Statement of Position
04-02,
Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing
Transactions
(SOP 04-02).
This Statement amends FASB Statement No. 67
Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of
Real Estate Projects
(SFAS No. 67) to state that the
guidance for incidental operations and costs incurred to sell
real estate projects does not apply to real estate time-sharing
transactions. The accounting for those operations and costs is
subject to the guidance in
SOP 04-02.
Bluegreens adoption of
SOP 04-02
resulted in a one-time, non-cash, cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle charge of $4.5 million to Bluegreen
for the year ended December 31, 2006, and
F-70
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
accordingly reduced the earnings in Bluegreen recorded by
Woodbridge by approximately $1.4 million for the same
period.
Purchase Accounting-Step Acquisition In
accordance with SFAS No. 141 Business
Combinations (SFAS No. 141), the
acquisition of additional shares by the Company in BankAtlantic
Bancorp and Woodbridge, are being accounted for as a step
acquisition under the purchase method of accounting. A step
acquisition is the acquisition of two or more blocks of an
entitys shares at different dates. In a step acquisition,
the acquiring entity identifies the cost of the investment, the
fair value of the portion of the underlying net assets acquired,
and the goodwill if any for each step acquisition. The discounts
and premiums arising as a result of such revaluations are
generally being accreted or amortized, net of tax. The excess of
the fair value over the purchase price (negative goodwill) was
allocated as a pro rata reduction of the amounts that would
otherwise have been assigned ratably to all of the non-current
and non-financial acquired assets, except assets to be disposed
of by sale, deferred tax assets and any other current assets. If
any excess remains after reducing to zero the amounts that
otherwise would have been assigned to those assets, that
remaining excess shall be recognized as an extraordinary gain
(see Note 2).
Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal
Activities Cost to terminate a lease contract
before the end of its term are recognized and measured when the
Company gives notice to the counterparty in accordance with the
contracts contractual terms or has negotiated a
termination of the contract with the counterparty. Contracts
that have not been terminated and have no economic benefit to
the Company are measured at fair value.
Advertising Advertising expenditures are
expensed as incurred.
Income Taxes BFC and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries file a consolidated U.S. federal income tax
return. Subsidiaries, in which the Company owns less than 80% of
the outstanding common stock, including BankAtlantic Bancorp and
Woodbridge, are not included in the Companys consolidated
U.S. federal income tax return. The Company and its
subsidiaries file separate state income tax returns for each
jurisdiction.
The provision for income taxes is based on income before taxes
reported for financial statement purposes after adjustment for
transactions that do not have tax consequences. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are realized according to the estimated
future tax consequences attributable to differences between the
carrying value of existing assets and liabilities and their
respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are
measured using the enacted tax rates as of the date of the
statement of financial condition. The effect of a change in tax
rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is reflected in the
period that includes the statutory enactment date. A deferred
tax asset valuation allowance is recorded when it has been
determined that it is more likely than not that deferred tax
assets will not be realized. If a valuation allowance is needed
a subsequent change in circumstances in future periods that
causes a change in judgment about the realization of the related
deferred tax amount could result in the reversal of the deferred
tax valuation allowance.
Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted Financial
Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
interpretation of FASB No 109
(FIN 48). An uncertain tax position is
defined by FIN 48 as a position taken or expected to be
taken in a tax return that is not based on clear and unambiguous
tax law and which is reflected in measuring current or deferred
income tax assets and liabilities for interim or annual periods.
The Company must recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax
position only if it is more likely than not that the tax
position will be sustained on examination by the taxing
authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The
Company measures the tax benefits recognized based on the
largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being
realized upon ultimate resolution. The Company recognizes
interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in
its provision for income taxes.
Noncontrolling Interest Noncontrolling
interest reflects third parties ownership interests in
entities that are consolidated and less than 100% owned.
F-71
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Accounting for Contingencies Reserves for
contingencies are recorded when it is probable that an asset has
been impaired or a liability has been incurred and the amount of
the loss can be reasonably estimated.
Brokered Deposits Brokered deposits are
accounted for at historical cost and discounts or premiums, if
any, are amortized or accreted using the effective interest
method over the term of the deposit.
Loss Per Share Basic (loss) earnings per
share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income
(loss) allocable to common stock (after deducting preferred
stock dividends) by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects
the potential dilution that could occur if options to acquire
common shares of the Company were exercised. Common stock
options, if dilutive, are considered in the weighted average
number of dilutive common shares outstanding. The options or
restricted stock are included in the weighted average number of
dilutive common shares outstanding based on the treasury stock
method, if dilutive. Diluted (loss) earnings per share is
computed in the same manner as basic (loss) earnings per share,
but it also takes into consideration the potential dilution from
securities issued by subsidiaries that enable their holders to
obtain the subsidiarys common stock. The resulting net
(loss) income amount is divided by the weighted average number
of dilutive common shares outstanding, when dilutive.
Stock-Based Compensation Plans Effective
January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value
recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment
(SFAS No. 123R), using the modified
prospective transition method. Under this transition method,
share-based compensation expense for each of the three year
period ended December 31, 2008, includes compensation
expense for all share-based compensation awards granted prior
to, but not yet vested as of, January 1, 2006, based on the
grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original
provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation
(SFAS No. 123). Share-based
compensation expense for all stock-based compensation awards
granted after January 1, 2006 is based on the grant-date
fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 123R. The Company recognizes these
compensation costs on a straight-line basis over the requisite
service period of the award, which is generally the option
vesting term of five years, except for options granted to
directors which vest immediately. SFAS No. 123R
requires public entities to initially measure compensation cost
associated with awards of liability instruments based on their
current fair value. The fair value of that award is to be
remeasured subsequently at each reporting date through the
settlement date. Changes in fair value during the requisite
service period will be recognized as compensation cost over that
period.
New
Accounting Pronouncements:
In December 2007, FASB Statement No. 141 (Revised 2007),
Business Combinations
(SFAS No. 141(R)) was issued. This
statement significantly changed the accounting for business
combinations. Under SFAS No. 141(R), an acquiring
entity will be required to recognize all the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date
fair value with limited exceptions. SFAS No. 141(R)
changed the accounting treatment for certain specific items,
including the following: acquisition costs are generally
expensed as incurred; noncontrolling interests (formerly known
as minority interests) is valued at fair value at
the acquisition date; acquired contingent liabilities are
recorded at fair value at the acquisition date and subsequently
measured at either the higher of such amount or the amount
determined under existing guidance for non-acquired
contingencies; and changes in deferred tax asset valuation
allowances and income tax uncertainties after the acquisition
date generally will affect income tax expense. Also included in
SFAS No. 141(R) are a substantial number of new
disclosure requirements. SFAS No. 141(R) applies
prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition
date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting
period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Earlier
adoption was prohibited. Effective January 1, 2009, the
Company adopted SFAS No. 141(R) and its guidance will
be applied prospectively to business combinations.
SFAS No. 141 (R) could have a material effect on the
Companys consolidated
F-72
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
financial statements to the extent the Company consummates
business combinations due to the requirement that all
transaction costs are expensed as incurred.
In December 2007, FASB issued FASB Statement No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements An Amendment of ARB No. 51
(SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160
established new accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Specifically, this statement
requires the recognition of a noncontrolling interest (minority
interest) as equity in the consolidated financial statements and
separate from the parents equity. SFAS No. 160
also established accounting and reporting standards for the
amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and
to the noncontrolling interest. SFAS No. 160 clarifies
that changes in a parents ownership interest in a
subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation are equity
transactions if the parent retains its controlling financial
interest. In addition, SFAS No. 160 requires that a
parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary
is deconsolidated. Such gain or loss is measured using the fair
value of the noncontrolling equity investment on the
deconsolidation date. SFAS No. 160 also includes
expanded disclosure requirements regarding the interests of the
parent and its noncontrolling interest. SFAS No. 160
is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those
fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008.
Earlier adoption is prohibited. The Company adopted
SFAS No. 160 on January 1, 2009, and accordingly
the Company has retrospectively changed the presentation of
noncontrolling interest in the consolidated financial statements
for all periods presented.
In March 2008, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities (SFAS No. 161).
SFAS No. 161 is intended to improve financial
reporting by requiring transparency about the location and
amounts of derivative instruments in an entitys financial
statements; how derivative instruments and related hedged items
are accounted for under SFAS No 133; and how derivative
instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys
financial position, financial performance and cash flows.
SFAS No. 161 is effective for the first quarter of
2009. SFAS No. 161 expands derivative disclosure on
the annual and interim reporting period. The Company believes
that the adoption of SFAS No. 161 will not have a
material impact on the Companys financial statements.
In April 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position (FSP)
FAS No. 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets (FSP
FAS No. 142-3).
FSP
FAS No. 142-3
amends paragraph 11(d) of FASB Statement No. 142
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS No. 142) which sets forth the
factors that should be considered in developing renewal or
extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a
recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142. FSP
FAS No. 142-3
intends to improve the consistency between the useful life of a
recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142 and the
period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of
the asset under SFAS No. 141R. FSP
FAS No. 142-3
is effective for the Companys fiscal year beginning
January 1, 2009 and must be applied prospectively to
intangible assets acquired after the effective date. The Company
believes that the adoption of FSP
FAS No. 142-3
will not have a material impact on the Companys financial
statements.
In June, 2008, the FASB issued FSP Emerging Issue Task Force
(EITF)
No. 03-6-1,
Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based
Payment Transactions are Participating Securities,
(FSP
EITF 03-6-1).
The Staff Position provides that unvested share-based payment
awards that contain no forfeitable rights to dividends or
dividend equivalents are participating securities and must be
included in the earnings per share computation. FSP
EITF 03-6-1
is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods
within those years. All prior-period earnings per share data
presented must be adjusted retrospectively. Early application is
not permitted. The adoption of
EITF 03-06-1
will not have an impact on the Companys financial
statements.
In September 2008, the FASB ratified EITF Issue
No. 08-5,
Issuers Accounting for Liabilities Measured at
Fair Value With a Third-Party Credit Enhancement
(EITF 08-5).
EITF 08-5
provides guidance for measuring liabilities issued with an
attached third-party credit enhancement (such as a guarantee).
It clarifies
F-73
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
that the issuer of a liability with a third-party credit
enhancement (such as a guarantee) should not include the effect
of the credit enhancement in the fair value measurement of the
liability.
EITF 08-5
is effective for the first reporting period beginning after
December 15, 2008. The Company is evaluating the impact
that the adoption of
EITF 08-5
will have on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
In September 2008, FASB issued FSP
FAS No. 133-1
and
FIN 45-4,
Disclosures about Credit Derivatives and Certain
Guarantees: An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB
Interpretation No. 45; and Clarification of the Effective
Date of FASB Statement No. 161, in order to
enhance the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments
and certain guarantees to reflect the potential adverse effects
of changes in credit risk on financial statements of sellers of
credit derivatives and certain guarantees. The FSP requires the
seller of credit derivatives to disclose: the nature of the
credit derivative, the maximum potential amount of future
payments, the fair value of the derivative and the nature of any
recourse provisions that would enable recovery from third
parties. The FSP amends FIN 45 to require disclosure of the
current status of the payment/performance risk of the guarantee.
FSP
No. 133-1
and
FIN 45-4
is effective for reporting periods ending after
November 15, 2008. The Company does not believe that this
FSP will have a material effect on the Companys financial
statements.
In October 2008, FASB issued
FAS No. 157-3,
Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When
the Market for That Asset Is Not Active (FSP
FAS No. 157-3),
in response to the deterioration of the credit markets. This FSP
provides guidance clarifying how SFAS No. 157
Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS No. 157), should be applied when
valuing securities in markets that are not active. The guidance
provides an illustrative example that applies the objectives and
framework of SFAS No. 157, utilizing managements
internal cash flow and discount rate assumptions when relevant
observable data do not exist. It further clarifies how
observable market information and market quotes should be
considered when measuring fair value in an inactive market. It
reaffirms the notion of fair value as an exit price as of the
measurement date and that fair value analysis is a transactional
process and should not be broadly applied to a group of assets.
FSP
FAS No. 157-3
is effective upon issuance including prior periods for which
financial statements have not been issued. The implementation of
FSP
FAS No. 157-3
had no material effect on the methodologies used to fair value
the Companys assets under the original
SFAS No. 157.
In November 2008, the FASB issued
EITF 08-6,
Equity Method Accounting Considerations
(EITF 08-6).
EITF 08-6
clarifies the application of equity method accounting under
Accounting Principles Board 18, The Equity Method of
Accounting for Investments in Common Stock.
Specifically, it requires companies to initially record equity
method investments based on the cost accumulation model,
precludes separate other-than-temporary impairment tests on an
equity method investees indefinite-lived assets from the
investees test, requires companies to account for an
investees issuance of shares as if the equity method
investor had sold a proportionate share of its investment, and
requires that an equity method investor continues to apply the
guidance in paragraph 19(l) of APB 18 upon a change in the
investors accounting from the equity method to the cost
method.
EITF 08-6
is effective prospectively for fiscal years beginning on or
after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those
fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of
EITF 08-6.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP
FAS No. 132(R)-1, Employers Disclosure
about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets, which amends
FASB Statement No. 132(R) to require more detailed
disclosures about employers pension plan assets.
FAS No. 132(R)-1 requires detailed disclosures about
employers investment strategies, major categories of plan
assets, concentrations of risk within plan assets and valuation
techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets.
FAS No. 132(R)-1 is effective for fiscal years ending
after December 15, 2009.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No,
140-4 and
FIN 46R-8
Disclosures by Public Entities (Enterprises) about
Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest
Entities which requires enhanced disclosure related to
variable interest entities in accordance with
SFAS No. 140 Accounting for
F-74
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments
of Liabilities and FASB Interpretation No. 46
(revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities. These disclosures include significant
judgments and assumptions, restrictions on asset, risk and the
affects on financial position, financial performance and cash
flows. The enhanced disclosures are effective for the first
reporting period that ends after December 15, 2008. The
implementation of this standard will not have a material impact
on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In January 2009, the FASB issued FSP
EITF 99-20-1,
Amendment to impairment guidance of
EITF 99-20.
This EITF applies to beneficial interests in securitized
financial assets. The amendment requires impairment on
beneficial interests to be measured only if it is probable that
there has been an adverse change in estimated cash flows.
EITF 99-20
required impairment to be measured when there was an adverse
change in cash flows as viewed by a market participant. The FSP
is effective for annual periods ending after December 15,
2008.
|
|
2.
|
Business
Combination and Step Acquisitions
|
Pizza
Fusion
Pizza Fusion is a restaurant franchise operating in a niche
market within the quick service and organic food industries.
Founded in 2006, Pizza Fusion was operating 16 locations in
Florida and California through December 31, 2008 and has
entered into franchise agreements to open an additional 14
stores during 2009.
On September 18, 2008, Woodbridge, through its wholly-owned
subsidiary, Woodbridge Equity Fund II LP, purchased for an
aggregate of $3 million, 2,608,696 shares of
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of Pizza Fusion,
together with warrants to purchase up to 1,500,000 additional
shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of Pizza
Fusion at an exercise price of $1.44 per share. Woodbridge also
has options, exercisable on or prior to September 18, 2009,
to purchase up to 521,740 additional shares of Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock of Pizza Fusion at a price of $1.15
per share and, upon exercise of such options, will receive
warrants to purchase up to 300,000 additional shares of
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of Pizza Fusion at an
exercise price of $1.44 per share. The warrants have a term of
10 years, subject to earlier expiration in certain
circumstances.
Woodbridge evaluated its investment in Pizza Fusion under
FIN No. 46(R) and determined that Pizza Fusion is a
VIE. Furthermore, Woodbridge has concluded that it is the
primary beneficiary and as such, has applied purchase accounting
and has consolidated the assets and liabilities of Pizza Fusion
in accordance with SFAS No. 141.
Acquisition
of Shares in BankAtlantic Bancorp and
Woodbridge
The acquisition of additional shares of BankAtlantic Bancorp in
August 2008 and December 2008, as well as the acquisition of
additional shares of Woodbridge in October 2007 were accounted
for as step acquisitions under the purchase method of
accounting. A step acquisition is the acquisition of two or more
blocks of an entitys shares at different dates. In a step
acquisition, the acquiring entity identifies the cost of the
investment, the fair value of the portion of the underlying net
assets acquired, and the goodwill if any for each step
acquisition. Accordingly, the net assets of BankAtlantic Bancorp
and Woodbridge have been recognized at estimated fair value to
the extent of BFCs increase in its ownership percentage at
its respective acquisition dates.
As required by SFAS No. 141, the Company determined
the fair value of the portion of the net assets acquired as of
the date of the acquisitions. In making that determination, the
Company used information that it believes was representative of
the fair value at that time. However, this is not necessarily
indicative of future values which can be influenced by a variety
of factors, such as prevailing market conditions, costs
associated with maintaining the value of the assets and any
other expenses that may be incurred in order to actually realize
that value.
F-75
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Shares
of BankAtlantic Bancorp Class A Common Stock
From August 18, 2008 through August 28, 2008, BFC
purchased an aggregate of 400,000 shares of BankAtlantic
Bancorps Class A common stock on the open market for
an aggregate purchase price of $2.8 million. BFCs
acquisition of the 400,000 shares of BankAtlantic
Bancorps Class A common stock increased BFCs
ownership interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp by approximately
3.6%. The excess of the fair value over the purchase price
(negative goodwill) of $16.7 million was allocated as a pro
rata reduction of the amounts that would otherwise have been
assigned ratably to all of the non-current and non-financial
acquired assets, except assets to be disposed of by sale and
deferred tax assets, until the basis of such acquired assets was
zero. The remaining unallocated negative goodwill of
approximately $9.1 million was recognized as an
extraordinary gain for the year ended December 31, 2008.
From December 2, 2008 through December 11, 2008, BFC
purchased an aggregate of 323,848 shares of BankAtlantic
Bancorps Class A common stock in or on the open
market for an aggregate purchase price of $1.1 million.
BFCs acquisition of the 323,848 shares of
BankAtlantic Bancorps Class A common stock increased
BFCs ownership interest in BankAtlantic Bancorp by
approximately 2.9%. The excess of the fair value over the
purchase price (negative goodwill) of $2.9 million was
allocated ratably to all of the non-current and non-financial
acquired assets, except assets to be disposed of by sale and
deferred tax assets.
Shares
of Woodbridge Class A Common Stock
Effective August 29, 2007, Woodbridge distributed to each
holder of record of Woodbridges Class A common stock
and Class B common stock on August 27, 2007, 5.0414
subscription rights for each share of such stock owned on that
date (the Rights Offering). Each whole subscription
right entitled the holder thereof to purchase one share of
Woodbridges Class A common stock at a purchase price
of $2.00 per share ($10 per share after adjusting for the
reverse stock split). The Rights Offering was completed on
October 1, 2007. Woodbridge received $152.8 million in
the Rights Offering and issued an aggregate of
76,424,066 shares (15,284,814 shares after adjusting
for the reverse stock split) of its Class A common stock on
October 1, 2007 in connection with the exercise of rights
by its shareholders. BFC purchased an aggregate of
3,320,543 shares of Woodbridges Class A common
stock in the Rights Offering for an aggregate purchase price of
$33.2 million.
BFCs acquisition of the 3,320,543 shares of
Woodbridges Class A common stock upon its exercise of
its subscription rights increased BFCs economic ownership
interest in Woodbridge by approximately 4.1%. The acquisition of
the additional interest in Woodbridge resulted in negative
goodwill (excess of fair value of acquired net assets over
purchase price of shares) of approximately $11 million.
After ratably allocating this negative goodwill to non-current
and non-financial assets, the Company recognized an
extraordinary gain, net of tax, of $2.4 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007.
|
|
3.
|
Discontinued
Operations
|
On February 28, 2007, BankAtlantic Bancorp sold Ryan Beck
to Stifel. Under the terms of the sales agreement, BankAtlantic
Bancorp and employees of Ryan Beck who held options to acquire
Ryan Beck common stock exchanged their entire interest in Ryan
Beck common stock and options to acquire Ryan Beck common stock
for an aggregate of 3,701,400 shares of Stifel common
stock, cash of $2.7 million and five-year warrants to
purchase an aggregate of 750,000 shares of Stifel common
stock at an exercise price of $24.00 per share. Of the total
Ryan Beck sales proceeds, BankAtlantic Bancorps portion
was 3,566,031 shares of Stifel common stock, cash of
$2.6 million and warrants to acquire an aggregate of
722,586 shares of Stifel common stock. BankAtlantic Bancorp
sold its entire investment in 3,566,031 shares of Stifel
common stock and warrants to acquire 722,586 shares of
Stifel common stock during the year ended December 31, 2008
and recognized a gain of $2.8 million.
F-76
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of December 31, 2007, BankAtlantic Bancorp owned
approximately 17% of the issued and outstanding shares of Stifel
common stock and did not have the ability to exercise
significant influence over Stifels operations. As such,
BankAtlantic Bancorps investment in Stifel common stock
was accounted for under the cost method of accounting. Stifel
common stock that could be sold within one year was accounted
for as securities available for sale and Stifel common stock
which was subject to restrictions on sale for more than one year
was accounted for as investment securities at cost. The warrants
were accounted for as derivatives with unrealized gains and
losses resulting from changes in the fair value of the warrants
recorded in securities activities, net. Included in the
Companys Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition as
of December 31, 2007 under securities available for
sale and investment securities at cost were
$72.6 million and $31.4 million, respectively, of
Stifel common stock, and included in financial instruments at
fair value was $10.6 million of warrants.
The Stifel sales agreement provided for contingent earn-out
payments, payable in cash or shares of Stifel common stock, at
Stifels election, based on (a) defined Ryan Beck
private client revenues during the two-year period immediately
following the Ryan Beck sale up to a maximum of $40 million
and (b) defined Ryan Beck investment banking revenues equal
to 25% of the amount that such revenues exceed
$25.0 million during each of the two twelve-month periods
immediately following the Ryan Beck sale.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, BankAtlantic
Bancorps discontinued operations included
$16.6 million of earn-out consideration. Associated with
this amount, BFCs discontinued operations, net of
noncontrolling interest, was approximately $4.5 million.
Ryan Becks investment banking revenues exceeded
$25 million during the first twelve months subsequent to
the sale and BankAtlantic Bancorp received additional
consideration of 55,016 shares of Stifel common stock
valued at $1.7 million. BankAtlantic Bancorp recognized
additional earn-out consideration of $14.9 million as
private client revenues exceeded the defined amounts as of
December 31, 2008. The additional consideration associated
with the private client revenues was pursuant to the
parties agreement to be payable by April 15, 2009 in
cash or Stifel stock. However, during 2008, BankAtlantic Bancorp
and Stifel entered into an amendment to the merger agreement
whereby Stifel agreed to prepay $10 million of the Ryan
Beck private client group earn-out payment for a discounted
payment of $9.6 million. BankAtlantic Bancorp received
233,500 shares of Stifel common stock in consideration for
the $9.6 million advance earn-out payment. The remaining
potential contingent earn-out payments, if any, will be
accounted for when earned as additional proceeds from the sale
of Ryan Beck and included in the Companys Consolidated
Statements of Operations as discontinued operations.
BankAtlantic Bancorp sold the 288,516 shares of Stifel
common stock received in connection with the investment banking
earn-out agreement and the private client earn-out advance
payment during the year ended December 31, 2008. Included
in other assets in the Companys statement of financial
condition as of December 31, 2008 was a $5.1 million
receivable from Stifel associated with the private client
revenue earn-out agreement.
F-77
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The gain on the sale of Ryan Beck included in the consolidated
statement of operations in Discontinued Operations
for the year December 31, 2007 was as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration received:
|
|
|
|
|
Stifel common stock and Warrants
|
|
$
|
107,445
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
2,628
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration received
|
|
|
110,073
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets disposed:
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations assets held for sale at disposal date
|
|
|
206,763
|
|
Discontinued operations liabilities held for sale at disposal
date
|
|
|
(117,364
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets available for sale at disposal date
|
|
|
89,399
|
|
Transaction cost
|
|
|
2,709
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposal of Ryan Beck before income taxes
|
|
|
17,965
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
2,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain on sale of Ryan Beck
|
|
$
|
15,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The (loss) income from operations of Ryan Beck included in the
consolidated statements of operations in Discontinued
operations was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Financial Services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment banking revenue
|
|
$
|
37,836
|
|
|
|
218,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee compensation and benefits
|
|
|
27,532
|
|
|
|
170,605
|
|
Occupancy and equipment
|
|
|
2,984
|
|
|
|
16,588
|
|
Advertising and promotion
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
|
5,788
|
|
Transaction related costs(1)
|
|
|
14,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
1,106
|
|
|
|
8,790
|
|
Communications
|
|
|
2,255
|
|
|
|
15,187
|
|
Floor broker and clearing fees
|
|
|
1,162
|
|
|
|
8,612
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
985
|
|
|
|
5,995
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,086
|
|
|
|
6,389
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses
|
|
|
52,113
|
|
|
|
237,954
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from Ryan Beck discontinued operations before income
taxes
|
|
|
(14,277
|
)
|
|
|
(19,493
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
(6,431
|
)
|
|
|
(8,958
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from Ryan Beck discontinued operations, net of income
taxes
|
|
$
|
(7,846
|
)
|
|
|
(10,535
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Ryan Beck sale related costs include $9.3 million of change
in control payments, $3.5 million of one-time employee
termination benefits and $1.5 million of share-based
compensation. |
F-78
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise
about which separate financial information is available that is
regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker in
assessing performance and deciding how to allocate resources.
Reportable segments consist of one or more operating segments
with similar economic characteristics, products and services,
production processes, type of customer, distribution system or
regulatory environment.
The information provided for segment reporting is based on
internal reports utilized by management of the Company and its
respective subsidiaries. The presentation and allocation of
assets and results of operations may not reflect the actual
economic costs of the segments as stand alone businesses. If a
different basis of allocation were utilized, the relative
contributions of the segments might differ but the relative
trends in segments operating results would, in
managements view, likely not be impacted.
The Company currently operates through five reportable segments,
which are: BFC Activities, BankAtlantic, BankAtlantic Bancorp
Other Operations, Land Division and Woodbridge Other Operations.
In 2007, the Company operated through two additional reportable
segments, Primary Homebuilding and Tennessee Homebuilding, both
of which were eliminated as a result of Levitt and Sons
deconsolidation as of November 9, 2007. The Companys
financial services activities include BankAtlantic Bancorp
results of operations and consist of two reportable segments,
which are: BankAtlantic and BankAtlantic Bancorp Other
Operations. The Companys real estate development
activities include Woodbridges results of operations and
consist of two reportable segments, which are: Land Division and
Woodbridge Other Operations. Prior to 2008, the BankAtlantic and
BankAtlantic Other Operations segments were combined and
reported under the single segment Financial
Services, but as of January 1, 2008, the Company
implemented a new internal reporting methodology for evaluating
its financial services activities and as a result the
Companys former Financial Services segment is now
comprised of two reportable segments instead of one as
previously reported.
The Company evaluates segment performance based on income (loss)
from continuing operations net of tax and noncontrolling
interest.
The following summarizes the aggregation of the Companys
operating segments into reportable segments:
BFC
Activities
This segment includes all of the operations and all of the
assets owned by BFC other than BankAtlantic Bancorp and its
subsidiaries and Woodbridge Holdings Corporation and its
subsidiaries. BFC Activities segment includes dividends from
BFCs investment in Benihanas convertible preferred
stock and income and expenses associated with shared service
operations in the areas of human resources, risk management,
investor relations and executive office administration and other
services that BFC provides to BankAtlantic Bancorp and
Woodbridge pursuant to shared services agreement. Additionally,
BFC provides certain risk management and administrative services
to Bluegreen. This segment also includes BFCs overhead and
expenses, the financial results of venture partnerships that BFC
controls and BFCs benefit for income taxes.
BankAtlantic
The Companys BankAtlantic segment consists of the banking
operations of BankAtlantic.
BankAtlantic
Bancorp Other Operations
BankAtlantic Bancorp Other Operations segment consists of the
operations of BankAtlantic Bancorp other operations, including
cost of acquisitions, asset and capital management and financing
activities.
F-79
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Primary
Homebuilding
The Companys Primary Homebuilding segment consisted of the
operations of Levitt and Sons homebuilding operations in
Florida, Georgia and South Carolina while they were included in
the consolidated financial statements.
Tennessee
Homebuilding
The Companys Tennessee Homebuilding segment consisted of
Levitt and Sons homebuilding operations in Tennessee while
they were included in the consolidated financial statements.
Land
Division
The Companys Land Division segment consists of Core
Communities operations.
Woodbridge
Other Operations
The Woodbridge Other Operations segment consists of Woodbridge
Holdings Corporations operations, the operations of
Carolina Oak and Pizza Fusion, other investment activities
through Cypress Creek Capital and Snapper Creek, an equity
investment in Bluegreen and an investment in Office Depot. In
2007, the Woodbridge Other Operations segment also consisted of
Levitt Commercial, LLC, which specialized in the development of
industrial properties. Levitt Commercial ceased development
activities in 2007. The results of operations and financial
condition of Carolina Oak as of and for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 were included in the Primary
Homebuilding segment, whereas the results of operations and
financial condition of Carolina Oak as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2008 are included in Woodbridge Other
Operations.
F-80
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following tables present segment information for the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bancorp
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodbridge
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BFC
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activities
|
|
|
BankAtlantic
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of real estate
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,268
|
|
|
|
2,484
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
13,837
|
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
313,307
|
|
|
|
1,445
|
|
|
|
1,931
|
|
|
|
2,418
|
|
|
|
(1,379
|
)
|
|
|
319,098
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
5,853
|
|
|
|
135,799
|
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
14,341
|
|
|
|
2,692
|
|
|
|
(4,821
|
)
|
|
|
154,535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
7,229
|
|
|
|
449,106
|
|
|
|
2,116
|
|
|
|
27,540
|
|
|
|
7,594
|
|
|
|
(6,115
|
)
|
|
|
487,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sale of real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,742
|
|
|
|
16,151
|
|
|
|
(10,055
|
)
|
|
|
12,838
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,534
|
|
|
|
21,262
|
|
|
|
3,637
|
|
|
|
8,115
|
|
|
|
(1,379
|
)
|
|
|
151,169
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,383
|
|
|
|
24,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159,801
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
12,393
|
|
|
|
328,534
|
|
|
|
8,741
|
|
|
|
24,608
|
|
|
|
26,597
|
|
|
|
(4,821
|
)
|
|
|
396,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
12,393
|
|
|
|
583,451
|
|
|
|
54,421
|
|
|
|
34,987
|
|
|
|
50,863
|
|
|
|
(16,255
|
)
|
|
|
719,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in (loss) earnings from unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
|
|
920
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,064
|
|
Impairment of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96,579
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96,579
|
)
|
Impairment of investment
|
|
|
(3,574
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,974
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,548
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(8,890
|
)
|
|
|
(133,425
|
)
|
|
|
(51,705
|
)
|
|
|
(7,447
|
)
|
|
|
(138,126
|
)
|
|
|
10,140
|
|
|
|
(329,453
|
)
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(14,887
|
)
|
|
|
31,121
|
|
|
|
1,395
|
|
|
|
(1,866
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss (income) from continuing operations
|
|
|
5,997
|
|
|
|
(164,546
|
)
|
|
|
(53,100
|
)
|
|
|
(5,581
|
)
|
|
|
(138,126
|
)
|
|
|
10,140
|
|
|
|
(345,216
|
)
|
Discontinued operations, less income taxes
|
|
|
4,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,461
|
)
|
|
|
16,605
|
|
Extraordinary gain, less income taxes
|
|
|
9,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
19,603
|
|
|
|
(164,546
|
)
|
|
|
(36,495
|
)
|
|
|
(5,581
|
)
|
|
|
(138,126
|
)
|
|
|
5,679
|
|
|
|
(319,466
|
)
|
Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(122,175
|
)
|
|
|
(27,097
|
)
|
|
|
(4,651
|
)
|
|
|
(115,105
|
)
|
|
|
8,449
|
|
|
|
(260,567
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to BFC
|
|
$
|
19,591
|
|
|
|
(42,371
|
)
|
|
|
(9,398
|
)
|
|
|
(930
|
)
|
|
|
(23,021
|
)
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
|
|
(58,899
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008 Total assets
|
|
$
|
26,468
|
|
|
|
5,713,690
|
|
|
|
542,478
|
|
|
|
339,941
|
|
|
|
220,587
|
|
|
|
(447,582
|
)
|
|
|
6,395,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-81
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bancorp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodbridge
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BFC
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Primary
|
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activities
|
|
|
BankAtlantic
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Homebuilding
|
|
|
Homebuilding
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of real estate
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
345,666
|
|
|
|
42,042
|
|
|
|
16,567
|
|
|
|
6,574
|
|
|
|
(734
|
)
|
|
|
410,115
|
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
|
2,374
|
|
|
|
369,570
|
|
|
|
2,320
|
|
|
|
613
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
3,880
|
|
|
|
7,158
|
|
|
|
(8,050
|
)
|
|
|
377,904
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
6,272
|
|
|
|
143,193
|
|
|
|
6,969
|
|
|
|
8,523
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
8,194
|
|
|
|
1,174
|
|
|
|
(3,821
|
)
|
|
|
170,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
8,646
|
|
|
|
512,763
|
|
|
|
9,289
|
|
|
|
354,802
|
|
|
|
42,125
|
|
|
|
28,641
|
|
|
|
14,906
|
|
|
|
(12,605
|
)
|
|
|
958,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales of real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
501,206
|
|
|
|
51,360
|
|
|
|
7,447
|
|
|
|
16,793
|
|
|
|
(3,565
|
)
|
|
|
573,241
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,060
|
|
|
|
23,054
|
|
|
|
7,258
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
2,629
|
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
|
|
(7,746
|
)
|
|
|
196,479
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,842
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
15,272
|
|
|
|
313,898
|
|
|
|
4,282
|
|
|
|
63,107
|
|
|
|
5,010
|
|
|
|
19,077
|
|
|
|
34,898
|
|
|
|
(3,738
|
)
|
|
|
451,806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
15,272
|
|
|
|
554,800
|
|
|
|
27,336
|
|
|
|
571,571
|
|
|
|
56,521
|
|
|
|
29,153
|
|
|
|
52,764
|
|
|
|
(15,049
|
)
|
|
|
1,292,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in (loss) earnings from unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
1,219
|
|
|
|
1,281
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(6,704
|
)
|
|
|
(40,818
|
)
|
|
|
(16,766
|
)
|
|
|
(216,729
|
)
|
|
|
(14,396
|
)
|
|
|
(512
|
)
|
|
|
(27,596
|
)
|
|
|
2,444
|
|
|
|
(321,077
|
)
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(19,271
|
)
|
|
|
(21,378
|
)
|
|
|
(6,194
|
)
|
|
|
(1,396
|
)
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
|
|
5,910
|
|
|
|
(34,297
|
)
|
|
|
5,914
|
|
|
|
(69,012
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations
|
|
|
12,567
|
|
|
|
(19,440
|
)
|
|
|
(10,572
|
)
|
|
|
(215,333
|
)
|
|
|
(16,096
|
)
|
|
|
(6,422
|
)
|
|
|
6,701
|
|
|
|
(3,470
|
)
|
|
|
(252,065
|
)
|
Discontinued operations, less income taxes
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,690
|
)
|
|
|
7,160
|
|
Extraordinary gain, less income taxes
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
16,008
|
|
|
|
(19,440
|
)
|
|
|
(2,760
|
)
|
|
|
(215,333
|
)
|
|
|
(16,096
|
)
|
|
|
(6,422
|
)
|
|
|
6,701
|
|
|
|
(5,160
|
)
|
|
|
(242,502
|
)
|
Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(14,610
|
)
|
|
|
(2,074
|
)
|
|
|
(179,268
|
)
|
|
|
(13,400
|
)
|
|
|
(5,346
|
)
|
|
|
5,579
|
|
|
|
(2,889
|
)
|
|
|
(212,043
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to BFC
|
|
$
|
16,042
|
|
|
|
(4,830
|
)
|
|
|
(686
|
)
|
|
|
(36,065
|
)
|
|
|
(2,696
|
)
|
|
|
(1,076
|
)
|
|
|
1,122
|
|
|
|
(2,271
|
)
|
|
|
(30,459
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007 Total assets
|
|
$
|
30,166
|
|
|
|
6,161,962
|
|
|
|
758,372
|
|
|
|
38,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
380,961
|
|
|
|
298,700
|
|
|
|
(554,225
|
)
|
|
|
7,114,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-82
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bancorp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodbridge
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BFC
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Primary
|
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activities
|
|
|
BankAtlantic
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Homebuilding
|
|
|
Homebuilding
|
|
|
Division
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of real estate
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
424,420
|
|
|
|
76,299
|
|
|
|
69,778
|
|
|
|
11,041
|
|
|
|
(15,452
|
)
|
|
|
566,086
|
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
|
2,292
|
|
|
|
364,949
|
|
|
|
2,448
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
961
|
|
|
|
3,377
|
|
|
|
(2,671
|
)
|
|
|
371,900
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
3,680
|
|
|
|
131,811
|
|
|
|
9,138
|
|
|
|
6,897
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
5,505
|
|
|
|
2,254
|
|
|
|
(2,708
|
)
|
|
|
156,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
5,972
|
|
|
|
496,760
|
|
|
|
11,586
|
|
|
|
431,751
|
|
|
|
76,426
|
|
|
|
76,244
|
|
|
|
16,672
|
|
|
|
(20,831
|
)
|
|
|
1,094,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sale of real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
367,252
|
|
|
|
72,807
|
|
|
|
42,662
|
|
|
|
11,649
|
|
|
|
(11,409
|
)
|
|
|
482,961
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,344
|
|
|
|
21,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(699
|
)
|
|
|
166,578
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,574
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
12,835
|
|
|
|
293,448
|
|
|
|
6,738
|
|
|
|
67,414
|
|
|
|
14,113
|
|
|
|
15,119
|
|
|
|
28,182
|
|
|
|
(2,626
|
)
|
|
|
435,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
12,835
|
|
|
|
447,366
|
|
|
|
28,671
|
|
|
|
434,666
|
|
|
|
86,920
|
|
|
|
57,781
|
|
|
|
39,831
|
|
|
|
(14,734
|
)
|
|
|
1,093,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in (loss) earnings from unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
1,634
|
|
|
|
(279
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(6,863
|
)
|
|
|
49,427
|
|
|
|
(15,451
|
)
|
|
|
(3,194
|
)
|
|
|
(10,494
|
)
|
|
|
18,463
|
|
|
|
(13,612
|
)
|
|
|
(6,097
|
)
|
|
|
12,179
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,105
|
|
|
|
(6,008
|
)
|
|
|
(1,508
|
)
|
|
|
(3,241
|
)
|
|
|
6,936
|
|
|
|
(5,639
|
)
|
|
|
(2,318
|
)
|
|
|
(530
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations
|
|
|
(5,006
|
)
|
|
|
36,322
|
|
|
|
(9,443
|
)
|
|
|
(1,686
|
)
|
|
|
(7,253
|
)
|
|
|
11,527
|
|
|
|
(7,973
|
)
|
|
|
(3,779
|
)
|
|
|
12,709
|
|
Discontinued operations, less income taxes
|
|
|
(1,524
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,492
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,481
|
|
|
|
(10,535
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(6,530
|
)
|
|
|
36,322
|
|
|
|
(20,935
|
)
|
|
|
(1,686
|
)
|
|
|
(7,253
|
)
|
|
|
11,527
|
|
|
|
(7,973
|
)
|
|
|
(1,298
|
)
|
|
|
2,174
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
28,468
|
|
|
|
(16,408
|
)
|
|
|
(1,406
|
)
|
|
|
(6,048
|
)
|
|
|
9,613
|
|
|
|
(6,649
|
)
|
|
|
(3,150
|
)
|
|
|
4,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to BFC
|
|
$
|
(6,505
|
)
|
|
|
7,854
|
|
|
|
(4,527
|
)
|
|
|
(280
|
)
|
|
|
(1,205
|
)
|
|
|
1,914
|
|
|
|
(1,324
|
)
|
|
|
1,852
|
|
|
|
(2,221
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
45,756
|
|
|
|
6,187,122
|
|
|
|
796,629
|
|
|
|
644,447
|
|
|
|
62,065
|
|
|
|
271,169
|
|
|
|
146,116
|
|
|
|
(547,538
|
)
|
|
|
7,605,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
Cumulative-Effect
Adjustment for Quantifying Financial Statement
Misstatements
|
In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) issued Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 108 (SAB No. 108)
which established an approach to quantify errors in financial
statements.
SAB No. 108 permitted companies to initially apply its
provisions by either restating prior period financial statements
or recording the cumulative effect of adjusting assets and
liabilities as of January 1, 2006 as an offsetting
adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. The
Company applied the provisions of SAB No. 108 using
the cumulative effect transition method in connection with the
preparation of its
F-83
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006.
The impact of quantifying the effects of prior period financial
statement misstatements using the dual-approach compared to the
roll-over method on opening statement of financial condition
balances was attributable to BankAtlantics adjustments and
such impact to the Companys financial condition balances
is summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Effect
|
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
|
As of January 1, 2006
|
|
|
Other liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Recurring operating expenses(1)
|
|
$
|
1,618
|
|
Deferred data processing expenses(2)
|
|
|
1,474
|
|
Current taxes payable
|
|
|
(696
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in other liabilities
|
|
|
2,396
|
|
Decrease in deferred tax liability
|
|
|
(657
|
)
|
Decrease in noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(1,486
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in retained earnings
|
|
$
|
253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
BankAtlantic has historically expensed certain recurring
invoices when paid. The effect of this accounting policy was not
material to the Companys financial statements in any given
year as the rollover impact of expenses in the
following year approximated the expenses that rolled over from
the prior year. |
|
(2) |
|
BankAtlantic pays a fixed fee for certain data processing
transaction services, and at the end of each contract year, the
actual number of transactions is determined and the fees related
to any greater or lesser transactions are invoiced or repaid to
BankAtlantic over a twelve month period. BankAtlantic accounted
for these charges when paid. The effect of this accounting
policy was not material to the Companys financial
statements in any given year and the amount of the error had
accumulated over a four year period as follows (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years
|
|
Occupancy and
|
|
Ended December 31,
|
|
Equipment Expense
|
|
|
2002
|
|
$
|
221
|
|
2003
|
|
|
276
|
|
2004
|
|
|
533
|
|
2005
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company had previously quantified these errors and concluded
that they were immaterial under the roll-over method that was
used prior to the issuance of SAB No. 108.
F-84
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
6.
|
Restructuring
Charges, Impairments and Exit Activities
|
BankAtlantic
Bancorp
The following provides BankAtlantic Bancorps changes in
restructuring and exit activities liabilities at
December 31, 2007 and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
2,527
|
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
|
|
3,543
|
|
Amounts paid or amortized
|
|
|
(2,425
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(2,451
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
|
1,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
|
1,092
|
|
Expense incurred
|
|
|
2,171
|
|
|
|
2,385
|
|
|
|
4,556
|
|
Amounts paid or amortized
|
|
|
(2,102
|
)
|
|
|
(1,913
|
)
|
|
|
(4,015
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31 , 2008
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
|
1,462
|
|
|
|
1,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in Financial Services in the Companys
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007 were the following restructuring
charges, impairments and exit activities relating to
BankAtlantic Bancorp (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Asset impairment
|
|
$
|
4,758
|
|
|
|
4,808
|
|
Employee termination costs
|
|
|
2,171
|
|
|
|
2,527
|
|
Lease termination, net
|
|
|
2,385
|
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
Reversal of deferred rent upon lease termination
|
|
|
(2,186
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on central Florida branch sale
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,395
|
|
|
|
8,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In December 2007, BankAtlantic decided to sell certain
properties that it had acquired for its future store expansion
program and terminate or sublease certain back-office operating
leases. As a consequence, BankAtlantic recorded a
$1.5 million impairment charge for back-office facilities
and for land acquired for store expansion, incurred a
$3.3 million impairment charge for engineering and
architectural fees associated with obtaining permits for store
sites and recorded lease termination liabilities of
$1.0 million associated with executed lease contracts.
Sales prices or annual rental rates for similar properties were
used to determine fair value.
In March 2007, BankAtlantic Bancorp reduced its workforce by
approximately 225 associates, or 8%. Included in the
Companys Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year
ended December 31, 2007 were $2.6 million of costs
associated with one-time termination benefits. These benefits
include $0.3 million of share-based compensation.
F-85
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
During the year ended December 31, 2008, BankAtlantic
incurred an additional $3.2 million of impairment charges
in connection with the decision to dispose of land acquired for
store expansion. BankAtlantic also incurred $1.5 million of
asset impairment charges associated with the consolidation of
back-office facilities.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, BankAtlantic
Bancorp further reduced its workforce by approximately 6%
primarily in the community banking and commercial lending
business units and incurred $2.2 million of employee
termination costs.
In order to consolidate its back-office facilities and terminate
or sublease certain operating leases executed for store
expansion during the year ended December 31, 2008,
BankAtlantic incurred $2.4 million of exit activity charges
associated with writing down lease contracts to fair values or
incurring costs to terminate lease contracts. By terminating
certain operating leases BankAtlantic realized a
$2.2 million benefit from the reversal of rent expense
recognized in prior periods upon taking possession of the
properties before the commencement of rent payments.
In June 2008, BankAtlantic sold five stores in Central Florida
to an unrelated financial institution. The following table
summarizes the assets sold, liabilities transferred and cash
outflows associated with the stores sold (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Assets sold:
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
6,470
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
13,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets sold
|
|
|
19,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities transferred:
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
(24,477
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(346
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities transferred
|
|
|
(24,823
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net liability transferred
|
|
|
(4,980
|
)
|
Deposit premium
|
|
|
654
|
|
Purchase transaction costs
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash outflows from sales of stores
|
|
$
|
(4,491
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-86
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Woodbridge
The following table summarizes Woodbridges restructuring
related accrual activity recorded for the year ended
December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent
|
|
|
Surety
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractor
|
|
|
Bond
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Agreements
|
|
|
Accrual
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
4,864
|
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
|
|
1,497
|
|
|
|
1,826
|
|
|
|
9,197
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(2,910
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,986
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
1,954
|
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
|
|
1,421
|
|
|
|
1,826
|
|
|
|
6,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
2,238
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
2,228
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(4,063
|
)
|
|
|
(446
|
)
|
|
|
(824
|
)
|
|
|
(532
|
)
|
|
|
(5,865
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
|
597
|
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
|
|
2,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the third and fourth quarters of 2007, substantially all of
Levitt and Sons employees were terminated and
22 employees were terminated at Woodbridge primarily as a
result of the Chapter 11 Cases. On November 9, 2007,
Woodbridge implemented an employee fund and indicated that it
would pay up to $5 million of severance benefits to
terminated Levitt and Sons employees to supplement the limited
termination benefits which Levitt and Sons was permitted to pay
to those employees. Levitt and Sons is restricted in the amount
of termination benefits it can pay to its former employees by
virtue of the Chapter 11 Cases.
The severance related and benefits accrual includes severance
and severance related payments made to Levitt and Sons
employees, payroll taxes and other benefits related to the
terminations that occurred in 2007 as part of the
Chapter 11 Cases. For the years ended December 31,
2008 and 2007, Woodbridge paid approximately $4.1 million
and $600,000, respectively, in severance and termination charges
related to the employee fund as well as severance for employees
other than Levitt and Sons employees which is reflected in the
Other Operations segment and paid $2.3 million in severance
to the employees of the Homebuilding Division prior to
deconsolidation in 2007. Employees entitled to participate in
the fund either received payments over time, which in certain
cases extended over two years, or a lump sum payment, dependent
on a variety of factors. For any amounts paid related to the
fund from the Woodbridge Other Operations segment, these
payments were in exchange for an assignment to Woodbridge by
those employees of their unsecured claims against Levitt and
Sons. At December 31, 2008 and 2007 there was $129,000 and
$2 million, respectively, accrued to be paid related to
this fund as well as severance for employees other than Levitt
and Sons employees. As of December 31, 2008, Woodbridge did
not expect to incur additional severance related expenses with
respect to the Levitt and Sons employees.
The facilities accrual represents expense associated with
property and equipment leases that Woodbridge had entered into
that are no longer providing a benefit to Woodbridge, as well as
termination fees related to contractual obligations Woodbridge
cancelled. Included in this amount are future minimum lease
payments, fees and expenses, net of estimated sublease income
for which the provisions of SFAS No. 146
Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal
Activities, as applicable, were satisfied. This
restructuring expense is included in selling general and
administrative expenses for the Woodbridge Other Operations
segment for the year ended December 31, 2007.
The independent contractor related expense relates to two
agreements entered into with former Levitt and Sons employees.
The agreements are for past and future consulting services. The
total commitment related to these agreements is $681,000 as of
December 31, 2008 and will be paid monthly through 2009.
The expense
F-87
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
associated with these arrangements is included in selling
general and administrative expenses for the Woodbridge Other
Operations segment for the years ended December 31, 2008
and 2007.
Levitt and Sons had $33.3 million in surety bonds related
to its ongoing projects at the time of the filing of the
Chapter 11 Cases. In the event that these obligations are
drawn and paid by the surety, Woodbridge could be responsible
for up to $11.7 million plus costs and expenses in
accordance with the surety indemnity agreements. As of
December 31, 2008, Woodbridge had a $1.1 million
surety bonds accrual at Woodbridge related to certain bonds for
which its management considers it to be probable that Woodbridge
will be required to reimburse the surety under applicable
indemnity agreements. During the year ended December 31,
2008, Woodbridge reimbursed the surety $532,000 in accordance
with the indemnity agreement for bond claims paid during the
period. It is unclear whether and to what extent the remaining
outstanding surety bonds of Levitt and Sons will be drawn and
the extent to which Woodbridge may be responsible for additional
amounts beyond this accrual. Woodbridge will not have the
ability to receive any repayment, assets or other consideration
as recovery from Levitt and Sons of any amounts it is required
to pay. The expense associated with this accrual is included in
other expense in the Woodbridge Other Operations segment for the
year ended December 31, 2007, due to its non-recurring and
unusual nature.
The Company tests goodwill for potential impairment annually or
during interim periods if impairment indicators exist. Based on
the results of BankAtlantic Bancorps impairment
evaluation, an impairment charge was recorded of approximately
$46.6 million, net of purchase accounting adjustment. The
entire amounts of $31 million and $17.3 million,
respectively, relating to BankAtlantics commercial lending
and community banking reporting units were determined to be
impaired. Goodwill associated with BankAtlantic Bancorps
capital services, tax certificates and investment reporting
units of $13.1 million, $4.7 million and
$4.4 million, respectively, was determined to not be
impaired.
The goodwill impairment recognized during 2008 generally
reflects the ongoing crisis in the financial services industry,
the decline of BankAtlantic Bancorps market capitalization
significantly below its tangible book value and the effect that
the continued deterioration in the general economy as well as
the Florida real estate markets has had on the credit quality of
BankAtlantic Bancorps and BankAtlantics loan
portfolios. The above trends primarily resulted in a decline in
the fair value of BankAtlantic Bancorps reporting units
resulting in the aforementioned goodwill impairment.
The process of evaluating goodwill for impairment involves the
determination of the fair value of BankAtlantic Bancorps
reporting units. Inherent in such fair value determinations are
certain judgments and estimates relating to future cash flows,
including BankAtlantic Bancorps interpretation of current
economic indicators and market valuations, and assumptions about
BankAtlantic Bancorps strategic plans with regard to its
operations. Due to the uncertainties associated with such
estimates, actual results could differ from such estimates.
In performing its impairment analysis, BankAtlantic Bancorp used
a combination of the discounted cash flow methodology and a
market multiple methodology to determine the fair value of each
reporting unit. The aggregate fair value of all reporting units
was compared to BankAtlantic Bancorps market
capitalization adjusted for a control premium in order to
determine the reasonableness of the financial model output. A
control premium represents the value an investor would pay above
minority interest transaction prices in order to obtain a
controlling interest in the respective company.
The discounted cash flow methodology establishes fair value by
estimating the present value of the projected future cash flows
to be generated from the reporting unit. The discount rate
applied to the projected future cash flows to arrive at the
present value is intended to reflect all risks of ownership and
the associated risks of realizing the stream of projected future
cash flows. BankAtlantic Bancorp generally uses a five year
F-88
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
period in computing discounted cash flow values. The most
significant assumptions used in the discounted cash flow
methodology are the discount rate, the terminal value and the
forecast of future cash flows.
The market multiple methodology establishes fair value by
comparing BankAtlantic Bancorps reporting units to other
similar publicly traded companies. The market multiples that
BankAtlantic Bancorp used in the determination of the fair value
of the reporting units were its market capitalization to its
tangible stockholders equity and its market capitalization
to its stockholders equity.
In the year ended December 31, 2006, Woodbridge conducted
an impairment review of the goodwill related to the Tennessee
Homebuilding segment in the Homebuilding Division acquired in
connection with its acquisition of Bowden Building Corporation
in 2004. Woodbridge used a discounted cash flow methodology to
determine the amount of impairment resulting in completely
writing off goodwill of approximately $1.3 million in the
year ended December 31, 2006. The write-off is included in
Real Estate Development other expenses in the consolidated
statements of operations.
|
|
8.
|
Federal
Funds Sold and Other Short Term Investments
|
The following table provides information on BankAtlantics
Federal Funds Sold (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Ending Balance
|
|
$
|
20,825
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
691
|
|
Maximum outstanding at any month end within period
|
|
$
|
362,360
|
|
|
|
21,555
|
|
|
|
16,276
|
|
Average amount invested during period
|
|
$
|
44,031
|
|
|
|
3,638
|
|
|
|
1,824
|
|
Average yield during period
|
|
|
1.92
|
%
|
|
|
4.77
|
%
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, BankAtlantic had
$10.4 million and $5.1 million, respectively, invested
in money market accounts with unrelated brokers.
|
|
9.
|
Securities
Available for Sale
|
The following tables summarize securities
available-for-sale
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Government agency securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
521,895
|
|
|
|
11,017
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
532,873
|
|
Real estate mortgage investment conduits(1)
|
|
|
165,449
|
|
|
|
1,846
|
|
|
|
944
|
|
|
|
166,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
687,344
|
|
|
|
12,863
|
|
|
|
983
|
|
|
|
699,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other bonds
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock (see Note 12)
|
|
|
16,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,426
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
6,686
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,798
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
|
|
|
23,362
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
710,706
|
|
|
|
12,975
|
|
|
|
983
|
|
|
|
722,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-89
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Government agency securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
585,796
|
|
|
|
4,378
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
589,619
|
|
Real estate mortgage investment conduits(1)
|
|
|
199,886
|
|
|
|
1,359
|
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
198,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
785,682
|
|
|
|
5,737
|
|
|
|
2,958
|
|
|
|
788,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other bonds
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
681
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
123,876
|
|
|
|
13,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
|
|
|
124,561
|
|
|
|
13,289
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
137,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
910,243
|
|
|
|
19,026
|
|
|
|
2,962
|
|
|
|
926,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Real estate mortgage investment conduits are pass-through
entities that hold residential loans, and investors are issued
ownership interests in the entities in the form of a bond. The
securities were issued by government agencies. |
The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair
value of the Companys securities available for sale with
unrealized losses that are deemed temporary, aggregated by
investment category and length of time that individual
securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position,
as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or Greater
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
4,736
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,736
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
Real estate mortgage investment conduits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,426
|
|
|
|
(944
|
)
|
|
|
27,426
|
|
|
|
(944
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available for sale securities:
|
|
$
|
4,736
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
27,426
|
|
|
|
(944
|
)
|
|
|
32,162
|
|
|
|
(983
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or Greater
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
68,821
|
|
|
|
(396
|
)
|
|
|
14,792
|
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
83,613
|
|
|
|
(555
|
)
|
Real estate mortgage investment conduits
|
|
|
3,475
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
35,398
|
|
|
|
(2,398
|
)
|
|
|
38,873
|
|
|
|
(2,403
|
)
|
Other bonds
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available for sale securities:
|
|
$
|
72,496
|
|
|
|
(401
|
)
|
|
|
50,436
|
|
|
|
(2,561
|
)
|
|
|
122,932
|
|
|
|
(2,962
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on securities outstanding greater than twelve
months at December 31, 2008 primarily reflect interest rate
increases. The cash flows of these securities are guaranteed by
government sponsored enterprises. BankAtlantic management has
the intent and ability to hold the securities until the price
recovers
F-90
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
and expects that the securities would be settled at a price not
less than the carrying amount. Accordingly, the Company does not
consider these investments
other-than-temporarily
impaired at December 31, 2008.
Unrealized losses on securities outstanding less than twelve
months at December 31, 2008 also reflect interest rate
increases. These securities are guaranteed by government
agencies and are of high credit quality. Since these securities
are of high credit quality and the decline in value has existed
for a short period of time, management believes that these
securities may recover their losses in the foreseeable future
and BankAtlantic management has the intent and ability to hold
securities until the price recovers. Accordingly, the Company
does not consider these investments
other-than-temporarily
impaired at December 31, 2008.
At December 31, 2008, the scheduled maturities of debt
securities available for sale were (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt Securities
|
|
|
|
Available for Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
December 31, 2008(1)(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within one year
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due after one year, but within five years
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
Due after five years, but within ten years
|
|
|
868
|
|
|
|
867
|
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
686,447
|
|
|
|
698,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
687,594
|
|
|
|
699,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Scheduled maturities in the above table may vary significantly
from actual maturities due to prepayments. |
|
(2) |
|
Scheduled maturities are based upon contractual maturities. |
Included in securities activities, net were (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Gross gains on securities sales
|
|
$
|
8,378
|
|
|
|
17,026
|
|
|
|
10,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross losses on securities sales
|
|
$
|
(5,103
|
)
|
|
|
(4,341
|
)
|
|
|
(168
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of securities
|
|
$
|
395,770
|
|
|
|
625,095
|
|
|
|
70,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary
impairments
|
|
$
|
(3,413
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management reviews its investment securities portfolio for
other-than-temporary
declines in value quarterly. As a consequence of BankAtlantic
Bancorps review during the year ended December 31,
2008, included in other-than temporary impairments is
$3.4 million associated with as
other-than-temporary
decline in value related to an equity investment in an unrelated
financial institution.
Woodbridge
Office Depot Investment
During March 2008, Woodbridge purchased 3,000,200 shares of
Office Depot common stock, which represented approximately one
percent of Office Depots outstanding common stock, at an
average price of $11.33 per share for an aggregate purchase
price of approximately $34 million.
During June 2008, Woodbridge sold 1,565,200 shares of
Office Depot common stock at an average price of $12.08 per
share for an aggregate sales price of approximately
$18.9 million. Woodbridge realized a gain of approximately
$1.2 million as a result of the sale which is included in
Real Estate Development securities activities.
F-91
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
During December 2008, Woodbridge performed an impairment
analysis of its remaining investment in Office Depot common
stock. Woodbridge concluded that there was an
other-than-temporary
impairment associated with its investment in Office Depot based
on the severity of the decline of the fair value of its
investment, the length of time the stock price had been below
the carrying value of Woodbridges investment, the
continued decline in the overall economy and credit markets, and
the unpredictability of the recovery of the Office Depot stock
price. Accordingly, Woodbridge recorded an
other-than-temporary
impairment charge of approximately $12 million representing
the difference of the average cost of $11.33 per share and the
fair value of $2.98 per share as of December 31, 2008
multiplied by the number of shares of Office Depot common stock
owned by Woodbridge at that date. As a result of the impairment
charge, Woodbridges investment in Office Depot was
$4.3 million at December 31, 2008. On March 13,
2009, the closing price of Office Depots common stock on
the New York Stock Exchange was $1.10 per share.
Data with respect to this investment is shown in the table below
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Total cost
|
|
$
|
33,978
|
|
Sale of portion of Office Depot common stock
|
|
|
(17,726
|
)
|
Other-than-temporary
impairment
|
|
|
(11,974
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value
|
|
$
|
4,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodbridge valued Office Depots common stock using a
market approach valuation technique and Level 1 valuation
inputs under SFAS No. 157. Woodbridge uses quoted
market prices to value equity securities. The fair value of the
Office Depot common stock at December 31, 2008 was
calculated based upon the $2.98 closing price of Office
Depots common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on
December 31, 2008. On March 13, 2009, the closing
price of Office Depot common stock was $1.10 per share.
Woodbridge will continue to monitor this investment in
accordance with FSP
FAS 115-1/124-1
to determine whether any further
other-than-temporary
impairment associated with this investment may be required in
future periods.
|
|
10.
|
Investment
Securities
|
The following tables summarize investment securities (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Private investment securities(3)
|
|
$
|
12,008
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Stifel restricted common stock(1)
|
|
$
|
31,433
|
|
|
|
3,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
34,494
|
|
Private investment securities
|
|
|
8,740
|
|
|
|
1,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,147
|
|
Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock(2)
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Equity securities(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
60,173
|
|
|
|
5,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
65,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Stifel common stock that was subject to restrictions for more
than one year was accounted for as investment securities at cost. |
F-92
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Historically, the Companys investment in Benihanas
Convertible Preferred Stock has been classified as investment
securities and has been carried at historical cost (see
Note 12). |
|
(3) |
|
Private investment securities consist of equity instruments
purchased through private placements and are accounted for at
historical cost adjusted for
other-than-temporary
declines in value. |
|
(4) |
|
Equity securities consisted of 3,587 shares of MasterCard
Class B common stock acquired through MasterCards
2006 initial public offering. |
During the year ended December 31, 2008, BankAtlantic
Bancorp redeemed private investment securities for net proceeds
of $6.3 million and recognized a $1.3 million gain
included in the Companys Consolidated Statement of
Operations in securities activities, net.
Management reviews its investment securities portfolio for
other-than-temporary
declines in value quarterly. As a consequence of BankAtlantic
Bancorps reviews a $1.1 million and
$3.4 million,
other-than-temporary
decline in value related to BankAtlantic Bancorp private
investment securities was recognized during the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. As of
December 31, 2008, there were no impaired investment
securities.
During the year ended December 31, 2006, MasterCard
International (MasterCard) completed an initial
public offering (IPO) of its common stock. Pursuant
to the IPO, member financial institutions received cash and
Class B common stock for their interest in MasterCard.
BankAtlantic received $0.5 million in cash and
25,587 shares of MasterCards Class B common
stock. The $0.5 million cash proceeds were reflected in the
Companys Consolidated Statement of Operations in Financial
Services Securities activities, net. The
Class B common stock received was accounted for as a
nonmonetary transaction and recorded at historical cost. During
the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, BankAtlantic
sold 3,313 shares and 22,000 shares of MasterCard
common stock for gains of $1.0 million and
$3.4 million, respectively.
In October 2007, BankAtlantics Investment Committee
approved a plan to restructure its investment portfolio with a
view towards improving the net interest margin and shortening
the duration of the portfolio. The tax-exempt municipal
securities in the investment securities portfolio had long
durations, and the tax-free returns on these securities were not
beneficial to BankAtlantic in light of losses which were
incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
As a consequence, BankAtlantics management decided to sell
the
held-to-maturity
municipal securities and transferred its entire
held-to-maturity
municipal securities portfolio of $203 million to
securities available for sale in October 2007.
BankAtlantics management does not plan to designate
securities as
held-to-maturity
for the foreseeable future and believes that maintaining its
securities in the available for sale category provides greater
flexibility in the management of the overall investment
portfolio.
The following table summarizes tax certificates (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Tax certificates(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of allowance of $6,064 and $3,289, respectively
|
|
$
|
213,534
|
|
|
|
224,434
|
|
|
|
188,401
|
|
|
|
188,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The estimated fair value was calculated at December 31,
2008 from an expected cash flow model discounted at an interest
rate that takes into account the risk of the cash flows of tax
certificates relative to alternative investments. At
December 31, 2007, management considered the estimated fair
value equivalent to book value for tax certificates since these
securities have no stated maturity and generally redeem in two
years or less. |
F-93
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Activity in the allowance for tax certificate losses was (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
3,289
|
|
|
|
3,699
|
|
|
|
3,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(4,668
|
)
|
|
|
(867
|
)
|
|
|
(295
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (charge-offs) recoveries
|
|
|
(4,511
|
)
|
|
|
(710
|
)
|
|
|
128
|
|
Provision charged to non-interest expense
|
|
|
7,286
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
6,064
|
|
|
|
3,289
|
|
|
|
3,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.
|
Benihana
Convertible Preferred Stock Investment
|
The Company owns 800,000 shares of Benihana Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock (Convertible Preferred
Stock). The Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible
into an aggregate of 1,578,943 shares of Benihanas
Common Stock at a conversion price of $12.67, subject to
adjustment from time to time upon certain defined events. Based
on the number of currently outstanding shares of Benihanas
capital stock, the Convertible Preferred Stock, if converted,
would represent an approximately 19% voting interest and an
approximately 9.4% economic interest in Benihana. Historically,
the Companys investment in Benihanas Convertible
Preferred Stock has been classified as investment securities and
has been carried at historical cost.
The Convertible Preferred Stock was acquired pursuant to an
agreement with Benihana on June 8, 2004 to purchase an
aggregate of 800,000 shares of Convertible Preferred Stock
for $25.00 per share. The shares of the Convertible Preferred
Stock have voting rights on an as if converted basis
together with Benihanas Common Stock on all matters put to
a vote of the holders of Benihanas Common Stock. The
approval of a majority of the holders of the Convertible
Preferred Stock then outstanding, voting as a single class, are
required for certain events outside the ordinary course of
business. Holders of the Convertible Preferred Stock are
entitled to receive cumulative quarterly dividends at an annual
rate equal to $1.25 per share, payable on the last day of each
calendar quarter. The Convertible Preferred Stock is subject to
mandatory redemption at the original issue price plus
accumulated dividends on July 2, 2014 unless BFC elects to
extend the mandatory redemption date to a later date not to
extend beyond July 2, 2024. In addition, the Convertible
Preferred Stock may be redeemed at the original issue price of
$20.0 million plus accumulated dividends by Benihana for a
limited period beginning three years from the date of issue if
the price of Benihanas Common Stock is at least $25.33 for
sixty consecutive trading days. At December 31, 2008, the
closing price of Benihanas Common Stock was $2.10 per
share. The market value of the Convertible Preferred Stock if
converted at December 31, 2008 would have been
approximately $3.3 million. During the quarter ended
December 31, 2008, the Company performed an impairment
review of its investment in Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock
to determine if an impairment adjustment was needed. Based on
the evaluation and the review of various qualitative and
quantitative factors, including the decline in the underlying
trading value of Benihanas common stock and the redemption
provisions of the Companys Convertible Preferred Stock,
the Company determined that there was an
other-than-temporary
decline of approximately $3.6 million, and accordingly, the
investment was written down to its fair value of approximately
$16.4 million. Concurrent with managements evaluation
of the impairment of this investment at December 31, 2008,
it made the determination to reclassify this investment from
investment securities which are carried at cost to investment
securities available for sale in accordance with
SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments
in Debt and Equity Securities.
See Note 34 for additional information concerning the
Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock.
F-94
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
13.
|
Loans
Receivable and Loans Held for Sale
|
The loan portfolio consisted of the following components (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$
|
1,916,562
|
|
|
|
2,155,752
|
|
Builder land loans
|
|
|
84,453
|
|
|
|
149,564
|
|
Land acquisition and development
|
|
|
182,585
|
|
|
|
202,177
|
|
Land acquisition, development and construction
|
|
|
104,629
|
|
|
|
151,321
|
|
Construction and development
|
|
|
229,856
|
|
|
|
265,163
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
713,571
|
|
|
|
534,916
|
|
Consumer home equity
|
|
|
718,950
|
|
|
|
676,262
|
|
Small business
|
|
|
218,694
|
|
|
|
211,797
|
|
Other loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business
|
|
|
144,554
|
|
|
|
131,044
|
|
Small business non-mortgage
|
|
|
108,230
|
|
|
|
105,867
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
16,406
|
|
|
|
15,667
|
|
Deposit overdrafts
|
|
|
9,730
|
|
|
|
15,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross loans
|
|
|
4,448,220
|
|
|
|
4,614,535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums, discounts and net deferred fees
|
|
|
3,221
|
|
|
|
3,936
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(137,257
|
)
|
|
|
(94,020
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable net
|
|
$
|
4,314,184
|
|
|
|
4,524,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
$
|
3,461
|
|
|
|
4,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale at December 31, 2008 and 2007 consisted
of $0 and $0.1 million, respectively, of residential loans
originated by BankAtlantic (primarily loans that qualify under
the Community Reinvestment Act) designated as held for sale and
$3.5 million and $4.0 million, respectively, of loans
originated through the assistance of an independent mortgage
company. The mortgage company provides processing and closing
assistance to BankAtlantic. Pursuant to an agreement, this
mortgage company purchases the loans from BankAtlantic
14 days after the date of funding. BankAtlantic owns the
loans during the 14 day period and accordingly earns the
interest income during the period. The sales price is negotiated
quarterly for all loans sold during the quarter based on
originated loan balance. Gains from the sale of loans held for
sale were $265,000, $494,000 and $680,000, respectively, for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.
Undisbursed loans in process consisted of the following
components (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
2,982
|
|
Construction and development
|
|
|
124,332
|
|
|
|
214,159
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
38,930
|
|
|
|
105,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total undisbursed loans in process
|
|
$
|
163,262
|
|
|
|
322,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-95
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
BankAtlantics loan portfolio had the following geographic
concentration based on outstanding loan balances at
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
Eastern U.S.A.
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
Western U.S.A.
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
Central U.S.A
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for Loan Losses (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
94,020
|
|
|
|
44,173
|
|
|
|
41,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans charged-off
|
|
|
(117,874
|
)
|
|
|
(23,213
|
)
|
|
|
(8,905
|
)
|
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off
|
|
|
1,310
|
|
|
|
2,218
|
|
|
|
2,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (charge-offs) recoveries
|
|
|
(116,564
|
)
|
|
|
(20,995
|
)
|
|
|
(6,231
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
159,801
|
|
|
|
70,842
|
|
|
|
8,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
137,257
|
|
|
|
94,020
|
|
|
|
44,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following summarizes impaired loans (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Specific
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Specific
|
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Allowances
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Allowances
|
|
|
Impaired loans with specific valuation allowances
|
|
$
|
174,710
|
|
|
|
41,192
|
|
|
|
113,955
|
|
|
|
17,809
|
|
Impaired loans without specific valuation allowances
|
|
|
138,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
313,258
|
|
|
|
41,192
|
|
|
|
181,079
|
|
|
|
17,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The average gross recorded investment in impaired loans was
$192.8 million, $76.7 million and $13.6 million
during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. BankAtlantic generally measures non-homogenous
loans for impairment using the fair value of collateral less
cost to sell method.
Interest income which would have been recorded under the
contractual terms of impaired loans and the interest income
actually recognized were (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Contracted interest income
|
|
$
|
14,276
|
|
|
|
15,042
|
|
|
|
2,715
|
|
Interest income recognized
|
|
|
(3,368
|
)
|
|
|
(10,071
|
)
|
|
|
(2,203
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foregone interest income
|
|
$
|
10,908
|
|
|
|
4,971
|
|
|
|
512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing assets consist of non-accrual loans, non-accrual
tax certificates, and real estate owned. Non-accrual loans are
loans on which interest recognition has been suspended because
of doubts as to the borrowers ability to repay principal
or interest. Non-accrual tax certificates are tax deeds or
certificates in which interest recognition has been suspended
due to the aging of the certificate or deed.
F-96
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Non-performing
assets (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Non-accrual tax certificates
|
|
$
|
1,441
|
|
|
|
2,094
|
|
|
|
632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
34,734
|
|
|
|
8,678
|
|
|
|
2,629
|
|
Commercial real estate and business
|
|
|
241,274
|
|
|
|
165,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
Small business
|
|
|
4,644
|
|
|
|
877
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
6,763
|
|
|
|
3,218
|
|
|
|
1,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accrual loans
|
|
|
287,415
|
|
|
|
178,591
|
|
|
|
4,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate owned
|
|
|
19,045
|
|
|
|
17,216
|
|
|
|
21,747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets
|
|
$
|
307,901
|
|
|
|
197,901
|
|
|
|
26,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in non-accrual loans at December 31, 2008 were
$4.8 million of troubled debt restructured loans. There
were no troubled debt restructured loans included in non-accrual
loans at December 31, 2007 and 2006.
Other
potential problem loans (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Performing impaired loans, net of specific allowances
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
Loan 90 days past due and still accruing
|
|
|
15,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Troubled debt restructured
|
|
|
28,173
|
|
|
|
2,488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total potential problem loans
|
|
$
|
43,894
|
|
|
|
2,488
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performing impaired loans are impaired loans which are still
accruing interest. Loans 90 days past due and still
accruing are primarily loans that matured and the borrower
continues to make payments under the matured loan agreement.
Troubled debt restructured loans are loans in which the original
terms were modified granting the borrower loan concessions due
to financial difficulties. BankAtlantic had commitments to lend
$15.6 million of additional funds on non-performing and
potential problem loans as of December 31, 2008.
Foreclosed asset activity in non-interest expense includes the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans and tax certificates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses, net
|
|
$
|
(1,243
|
)
|
|
|
(243
|
)
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
Impairment of REO
|
|
|
(1,465
|
)
|
|
|
(7,299
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
Net (loss) gain on sales
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
1,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) gain on real estate owned activity
|
|
$
|
(2,832
|
)
|
|
|
(7,115
|
)
|
|
|
1,228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-97
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
14.
|
Properties
and Equipment
|
Properties and equipment was comprised of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Land, buildings and improvements
|
|
$
|
292,328
|
|
|
|
315,430
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
104,363
|
|
|
|
115,504
|
|
Water irrigation facilities
|
|
|
12,346
|
|
|
|
11,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
409,037
|
|
|
|
442,449
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
93,690
|
|
|
|
81,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Properties and equipment net
|
|
$
|
315,347
|
|
|
|
360,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic Bancorps depreciation expense was
$20.7 million, $19.8 million and $16.0 million
for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, and is included in Financial Services occupancy
and equipment expenses. Also included in depreciation expense
for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was
$3.1 million, $3.0 million and $2.6 million,
respectively, of software cost amortization. BankAtlantic
Bancorps unamortized software costs were $4.8 million
and $6.4 million at December 31, 2008 and 2007.
Woodbridges depreciation expense was $5.7 million,
$3.1 million and $2.6 million for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and is
included in Real Estate Development selling, general and
administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006,
BankAtlantic exchanged branch facilities properties with
unrelated third parties. The transactions were real estate for
real estate exchanges with no cash payments received. The
transactions were accounted for at the fair value of the branch
facilities transferred and BankAtlantic recognized a
$0.5 million and $1.8 million gain in connection with
the exchanges for the years ended December 31, 2007 and
2006, respectively.
Woodbridge received proceeds from the sale of property and
equipment for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2006 of
approximately $5.6 million and $1.9 million,
respectively. As a result of these sales, Woodbridge realized a
gain on sale of property and equipment for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2006 of approximately
$2.5 million and $1.9 million, respectively. Sales of
property and equipment for the year ended December 31, 2007
were not material.
In 2007, Woodbridge performed a review of its fixed assets and
determined that certain leasehold improvements were no longer
appropriately valued upon vacating the leased space associated
with those improvements. Therefore, the leasehold improvements
in the amount of $564,000 related to this vacated space were
written off in the year ended December 31, 2007.
|
|
15.
|
Real
Estate Held for Development and Sale
|
Real estate held for development and sale consisted of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Land and land development costs
|
|
$
|
221,684
|
|
|
|
216,090
|
|
Construction costs
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
5,426
|
|
Capitalized interest and other costs
|
|
|
38,539
|
|
|
|
35,009
|
|
Land held for sale
|
|
|
8,077
|
|
|
|
13,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
268,763
|
|
|
|
270,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-98
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Real estate held for development and sale consisted of the
combined real estate assets of Woodbridge and its subsidiaries
as well as BankAtlantics residential construction
development acquired in 2002. Also included in other real estate
held for development and sale is BFCs unsold land at the
commercial development known as Center Port in Pompano Beach,
Florida.
BankAtlantic
Bancorp
During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
BankAtlantic Bancorp recorded real estate inventory impairments
of $1.2 million and a $5.2 million, respectively,
associated with declining fair values of residential real
estate. Land held for sale is land BankAtlantic acquired for its
store expansion program. In December 2007, BankAtlantic decided
to sell this land and transferred the properties from properties
held for use to land and facilities held for sale. BankAtlantic
evaluates these properties based on updated indicators of value
periodically and recognized $2.8 million and
$1.1 million of impairments during the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Woodbridge
As of December 31, 2008, inventory of real estate included
inventory related to the operations of Woodbridges Land
Division and Carolina Oak.
As a result of the various impairment analyses conducted
throughout 2008, 2007 and 2006, Woodbridge recorded impairment
charges of approximately $3.5 million, $226.9 million
and $36.8 million, respectively, in cost of sales of real
estate in the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, Woodbridge made the decision
to suspend the development activities of Carolina Oak and is
re-evaluating its alternatives with respect to this entity due
to the continued deterioration of the real estate markets. As a
result, Woodbridge re-evaluated its impairment analyses in
accordance with SFAS No. 144 and determined that an
impairment charge of $3.5 million was required to write the
inventory down to its fair value at December 31, 2008. This
impairment charge was recorded in Woodbridges Other
Operations segment. The impairment charges recorded in 2007 and
2006 related to Levitt and Sons inventory of real estate
and were recorded in the Primary and Tennessee Homebuilding
segments. In addition, included in total impairment charges was
approximately $2.4 million in 2008, and $9.3 million
in 2007 of impairment charges relating to capitalized interest
in Woodbridges Other Operations segment in connection with
Carolina Oak in 2008 and the projects that Levitt and Sons
ceased developing in 2007, respectively.
The following table is a summary of the Companys
consolidated interest expense and the amounts capitalized (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
162,669
|
|
|
|
243,439
|
|
|
|
209,509
|
|
Interest capitalized
|
|
|
(11,500
|
)
|
|
|
(46,960
|
)
|
|
|
(42,931
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
$
|
151,169
|
|
|
|
196,479
|
|
|
|
166,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-99
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
17.
|
Investments
in Unconsolidated Affiliates
|
The consolidated statements of financial condition include the
following amounts for investments in unconsolidated affiliates
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Investment in Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
$
|
29,789
|
|
|
|
111,321
|
|
Investments in joint ventures
|
|
|
2,973
|
|
|
|
5,615
|
|
BankAtlantic Bancorp investment in statutory business trusts
|
|
|
8,218
|
|
|
|
8,820
|
|
Woodbridge investment in statutory business trusts
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
2,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
41,386
|
|
|
|
128,321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The consolidated statements of operations include the following
amounts for equity (loss) earnings from unconsolidated
affiliates (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Earnings from Bluegreen
|
|
$
|
13,696
|
|
|
|
10,275
|
|
|
|
9,684
|
|
Loss from joint ventures
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(416
|
)
|
Earnings from statutory trusts
|
|
|
1,520
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
1,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,064
|
|
|
|
12,724
|
|
|
|
10,935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In January 2008, February 2007 and January 2006, BankAtlantic
Bancorp recorded a gain of approximately $1.0 million,
$1.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively,
associated with the sale of the underlying properties in joint
ventures. During 2008, BankAtlantic Bancorp liquidated all of
its investments in rental real estate joint ventures.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, Woodbridge determined that
the fair value of its investment in unconsolidated trusts, which
consists of its common interests in subordinated trust debt
securities of approximately $406,000, was less than the carrying
value of this investment of $2.6 million primarily due to
the deterioration of the market for these instruments and
overall economic conditions. The fair value was assessed using
Level 3 inputs as defined by FAS No. 157, whereby
Woodbridges valuation technique was to measure the fair
value based upon the current rates and spreads that were used to
value the underlying subordinated trust debt securities which is
primarily based upon similarly rated corporate bonds. Woodbridge
evaluated its investment for other-than-temporary impairment due
to the significance of the carrying value in excess of fair
value, and the lack of evidence to support the recoverability of
the carrying value in the near future. Therefore, based upon the
criteria for other-than-temporary impairment as defined in FSP
FAS 115-1/FAS 124-1,
Woodbridge determined that an impairment charge of approximately
$2.1 million was required at December 31, 2008.
Investment
in Bluegreen
At December 31, 2008, Woodbridge owned approximately
9.5 million shares of common stock of Bluegreen,
representing approximately 31% of Bluegreens outstanding
common stock. Woodbridge accounts for its investment in
Bluegreen under the equity method of accounting. The cost of the
Bluegreen investment is adjusted to recognize Woodbridges
interest in Bluegreens earnings or losses. The difference
between a) Woodbridges ownership percentage in
Bluegreen multiplied by its earnings and b) the amount of
Woodbridges equity in earnings of Bluegreen as reflected
in Woodbridges financial statements relates to the
amortization or accretion of purchase accounting adjustments
made at the time of the acquisition of Bluegreens common
stock, to adjustments made to Woodbridges investment
balance related to equity
F-100
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
transactions recorded by Bluegreen that effect Woodbridges
ownership and to the cumulative adjustment discussed below.
Effective January 1, 2006, Bluegreen adopted
SOP 04-02.
This Statement amends FAS No. 67 to state that the
guidance for (a) incidental operations and (b) costs
incurred to sell real estate projects does not apply to real
estate time-sharing transactions. The accounting for those
operations and costs is subject to the guidance in
SOP 04-02.
Bluegreens adoption of
SOP 04-02
resulted in a one-time, non-cash, cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle charge of $4.5 million to Bluegreen
for the year ended December 31, 2006, and accordingly
reduced the earnings in Bluegreen recorded by Woodbridge by
approximately $1.4 million for the same period.
During 2008, Woodbridge began evaluating its investment in
Bluegreen for other-than-temporary impairment in accordance with
FSP
FAS 115-1/FAS 124-1,
APB No. 18 and SAB No. 59 as the fair value of
the Bluegreen stock had fallen below the carrying value of
Woodbridges investment in Bluegreen of approximately $12
per share. Woodbridge analyzed various quantitative and
qualitative factors including Woodbridges intent and
ability to hold the investment, the severity and duration of the
impairment and the prospects for the improvement of fair value.
On July 21, 2008, Bluegreens Board of Directors
entered into a non-binding letter of intent for the sale of
Bluegreens outstanding common stock for $15 per share to a
third party, with a due diligence and exclusivity period through
September 15, 2008. This due diligence and exclusivity
period was subsequently extended through November 15, 2008.
In October 2008, Bluegreen disclosed that the third party buyer
had been unable to obtain the financing necessary to execute a
sale transaction, therefore, no assurances could be provided
that a sale would be completed. As of December 31, 2008,
the exclusivity period had expired and Bluegreen was not able to
consummate a sale.
At September 30, 2008, Woodbridges investment in
Bluegreen was $114.6 million (net of BFCs purchase
accounting of $4.7 million) compared to the
$65.8 million trading value (calculated based upon the
$6.91 closing price of Bluegreens common stock on the New
York Stock Exchange on September 30, 2008). Woodbridge
determined that its investment in Bluegreen was
other-than-temporarily impaired due to the severity of the
decline in the fair value of the investment, the probability
that a sale could not be executed by Bluegreen, and due to the
deterioration of the debt and equity markets in the third
quarter of 2008. Therefore, Woodbridge recorded an impairment
charge of $53.6 million adjusting the carrying value of its
investment in Bluegreen to $65.8 million at
September 30, 2008. Additionally, after further evaluation
of Woodbridges investment in Bluegreen as of
December 31, 2008, based on, among other things, the
continued decline of Bluegreens common stock price and the
continued deterioration of the equity markets, Woodbridge
determined that an additional impairment of the investment in
Bluegreen was appropriate. Accordingly, Woodbridge recorded a
$40.8 million impairment charge (calculated based upon the
$3.13 closing price of Bluegreens common stock on the New
York Stock Exchange on December 31, 2008) and adjusted
the carrying value of its investment in Bluegreen to
$29.8 million. On March 13, 2009, the closing price of
Bluegreens common stock was $1.12 per share.
As a result of the step acquisition of Woodbridge shares by BFC
in 2007 and the impairment charges taken by Woodbridge in 2008,
a basis difference was created between the Companys
investment in Bluegreen and the underlying assets and
liabilities carried on the books of Bluegreen of
$13.9 million.. Therefore, earnings from Bluegreen will be
adjusted each period to reflect the amortization of this basis
difference. As such, an allocation methodology was established
by which the basis difference was allocated to the relative fair
value of Bluegreens underlying assets based upon the
position that the basis difference was a reflection of the
perceived value of these underlying assets. The appropriate
amortization will be calculated based on the useful lives of the
underlying assets and other relevant data associated with each
asset category. As such, amortization of $13.9 million was
recorded into the Companys pro rata share of
Bluegreens net loss for the period ended December 31,
2008.
F-101
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table shows the reconciliation of earnings in
Bluegreen Corporation (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Prorata share of Bluegreens net loss
|
|
$
|
(154
|
)
|
Amortization of basis difference
|
|
|
13,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earnings from Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
$
|
13,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table shows the reconciliation of the
Companys prorata share of its net investment in Bluegreen
and its investment in Bluegreen after impairment charges (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Prorata share of investment in Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
$
|
115,072
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustment (from the step acquisition)
|
|
|
(4,700
|
)
|
Amortization of basis difference
|
|
|
13,850
|
|
Less: Impairment of investment in Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
|
(94,433
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
$
|
29,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bluegreens condensed consolidated financial statements are
presented below:
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,193,507
|
|
|
|
1,039,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
781,522
|
|
|
|
632,047
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
382,467
|
|
|
|
385,108
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
29,518
|
|
|
|
22,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,193,507
|
|
|
|
1,039,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-102
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues and other income
|
|
$
|
602,043
|
|
|
|
691,494
|
|
|
|
671,509
|
|
Cost and other expenses
|
|
|
594,698
|
|
|
|
632,280
|
|
|
|
609,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
7,345
|
|
|
|
59,214
|
|
|
|
62,491
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(766
|
)
|
|
|
(19,567
|
)
|
|
|
(20,861
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
6,579
|
|
|
|
39,647
|
|
|
|
41,630
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,678
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
6,579
|
|
|
|
39,647
|
|
|
|
35,952
|
|
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
7,095
|
|
|
|
7,721
|
|
|
|
7,319
|
|
Noncontrolling interest in cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
$
|
(516
|
)
|
|
|
31,926
|
|
|
|
29,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the fourth quarter of 2008, Bluegreen recorded
$15.6 million in restructuring charges as part of its
strategic initiative to conserve cash by reducing overhead and
capital spending, among other things. In addition, Bluegreen
recorded an $8.5 million impairment charge related to its
goodwill.
BankAtlantic
Bancorp Investment in Statutory Business Trusts
BankAtlantic Bancorp has investments in thirteen statutory
business trusts which were solely formed in connection with
BankAtlantic Bancorps issuance of its trust preferred
securities. The statutory business trusts condensed
combined statements of financial condition as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007 and condensed combined
statements of operation for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Statement of Financial Condition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
$
|
294,195
|
|
|
|
294,195
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,035
|
|
|
|
1,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
295,230
|
|
|
|
295,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust preferred securities
|
|
$
|
285,375
|
|
|
|
285,375
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
1,035
|
|
|
|
1,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
286,410
|
|
|
|
286,447
|
|
Common securities
|
|
|
8,820
|
|
|
|
8,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Equity
|
|
$
|
295,230
|
|
|
|
295,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-103
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Statement of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income from subordinated debentures
|
|
$
|
20,197
|
|
|
|
22,274
|
|
|
|
20,913
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(19,596
|
)
|
|
|
(21,612
|
)
|
|
|
(20,286
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
601
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
627
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
BankAtlantic Bancorp received dividends from unconsolidated
affiliates of $0.6 million, $1.2 million and
$1.0 million, respectively.
The weighted average nominal interest rate payable on deposit
accounts at December 31, 2008
and 2007 was 1.41% and 3.22%, respectively. The stated rates and
balances on deposits were (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Interest free checking
|
|
$
|
741,691
|
|
|
|
18.89
|
%
|
|
|
824,211
|
|
|
|
20.85
|
%
|
Insured money fund savings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.70% at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
427,762
|
|
|
|
10.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.45% at December 31, 2007,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
624,390
|
|
|
|
15.79
|
|
NOW accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.50% at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
992,762
|
|
|
|
25.28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.50% at December 31, 2007,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900,233
|
|
|
|
22.77
|
|
Savings accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.50% at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
419,494
|
|
|
|
10.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.50% at December 31, 2007,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
580,497
|
|
|
|
14.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-certificate accounts
|
|
|
2,581,709
|
|
|
|
65.74
|
|
|
|
2,929,331
|
|
|
|
74.09
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificate accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 2.00%
|
|
|
189,528
|
|
|
|
4.83
|
|
|
|
16,261
|
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
2.01% to 3.00%
|
|
|
145,188
|
|
|
|
3.70
|
|
|
|
52,435
|
|
|
|
1.33
|
|
3.01% to 4.00%
|
|
|
598,461
|
|
|
|
15.24
|
|
|
|
164,744
|
|
|
|
4.17
|
|
4.01% to 5.00%
|
|
|
337,885
|
|
|
|
8.61
|
|
|
|
445,498
|
|
|
|
11.27
|
|
5.01% to 6.00%
|
|
|
67,108
|
|
|
|
1.71
|
|
|
|
339,625
|
|
|
|
8.59
|
|
6.01% to 7.00%
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total certificate accounts
|
|
|
1,338,176
|
|
|
|
34.09
|
|
|
|
1,018,595
|
|
|
|
25.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposit accounts
|
|
|
3,919,885
|
|
|
|
99.83
|
|
|
|
3,947,926
|
|
|
|
99.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium on brokered deposits
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest earned not credited to deposit accounts
|
|
|
6,572
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
5,479
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,926,368
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
3,953,405
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-104
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Interest expense by deposit category was (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Money fund savings and NOW accounts
|
|
$
|
17,783
|
|
|
|
26,031
|
|
|
|
20,413
|
|
Savings accounts
|
|
|
4,994
|
|
|
|
12,559
|
|
|
|
2,936
|
|
Certificate accounts below $100,000
|
|
|
21,195
|
|
|
|
25,512
|
|
|
|
23,136
|
|
Certificate accounts, $100,000 and above
|
|
|
20,856
|
|
|
|
21,002
|
|
|
|
13,048
|
|
Less early withdrawal penalty
|
|
|
(565
|
)
|
|
|
(628
|
)
|
|
|
(574
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
64,263
|
|
|
|
84,476
|
|
|
|
58,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008, the amounts of scheduled maturities
of certificate accounts were (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
Interest Rates
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
0.00% to 2.00%
|
|
$
|
188,928
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
2.01% to 3.00%
|
|
|
136,775
|
|
|
|
6,505
|
|
|
|
1,342
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.01% to 4.00%
|
|
|
581,465
|
|
|
|
7,435
|
|
|
|
3,408
|
|
|
|
2,718
|
|
|
|
3,431
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
4.01% to 5.00%
|
|
|
283,391
|
|
|
|
13,687
|
|
|
|
6,798
|
|
|
|
26,576
|
|
|
|
7,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.01% to 6.00%
|
|
|
38,579
|
|
|
|
25,204
|
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
870
|
|
|
|
1,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.01% and greater
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,229,144
|
|
|
|
53,265
|
|
|
|
12,375
|
|
|
|
30,323
|
|
|
|
13,054
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time deposits of $100,000 and over had the following maturities
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
3 months or less
|
|
$
|
259,704
|
|
4 to 6 months
|
|
|
159,763
|
|
7 to 12 months
|
|
|
170,000
|
|
More than 12 months
|
|
|
74,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
663,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in deposits at December 31, was (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Brokered deposits
|
|
$
|
239,888
|
|
|
|
14,665
|
|
Public deposits
|
|
|
243,745
|
|
|
|
323,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total institutional deposits
|
|
$
|
483,633
|
|
|
|
338,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008, BankAtlantic pledged
$109.3 million of securities available for sale against
public deposits.
F-105
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
19. Advances
from Federal Home Loan Bank
At December 31, 2008, the amount of fixed rate FHLB
outstanding were (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
Advances Maturing During the Year Ended:
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
7/10/2009
|
|
|
|
3.69
|
%
|
|
$
|
565,271
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
4/13/2010
|
|
|
|
2.84
|
%
|
|
|
402,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total advances from the FHLB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
967,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The average interest rate of FHLB advances outstanding during
the year ended December 31, 2008 was 3.59% and the average
interest rate on FHLB advances at December 31, 2008 was
3.34%.
BankAtlantics line of credit with the FHLB is limited to
40% of assets, subject to available collateral, with a maximum
term of 10 years. At December 31, 2008,
$1.6 billion of 1-4 family residential loans,
$137.3 million of commercial real estate loans and
$688 million of consumer loans were pledged against FHLB
advances. In addition, FHLB stock is pledged as collateral for
outstanding FHLB advances. BankAtlantics available
borrowings under the FHLB line of credit were $672 million
as of December 31, 2008.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, BankAtlantic
incurred prepayment penalties of $1.6 million upon the
repayment of $692 million of FHLB advances. During the year
ended December 31, 2006, BankAtlantic incurred prepayment
penalties of $1.5 million upon the repayment of
$384 million of FHLB advances and recorded a gain of
$1.5 million upon the repayment of $100 million of
advances.
|
|
20.
|
Federal
Funds Purchased and Treasury Borrowings
|
BankAtlantic established $35 million of lines of credit
with other banking institutions for the purchase of federal
funds. During 2008, BankAtlantic also participated in a treasury
tax and loan program (TTL) with the Department of
Treasury (the Treasury) and a term auction
facilities program (TAF) with the Federal Reserve
Board. Under this Treasury program, the Treasury, at its option,
can invest up to $50 million with BankAtlantic at a federal
funds rate less 25 basis points. BankAtlantic is also
eligible to borrow under the Federal Reserve discount window and
had no borrowings under this program at December 31, 2008
and 2007.
At December 31, 2008, BankAtlantic has pledged as
collateral for the TAF program $225.4 million of agency
securities available for sale, $111.8 million of commercial
mortgage loans, and $11.6 million of consumer loans.
BankAtlantic pledged $51.4 million of agency securities
available for sale as collateral under TTL program. At
December 31, 2008 and 2007, the outstanding balance under
this TAF program was $236 million and $0, respectively. At
December 31, 2008 and 2007 the outstanding balance under
this TTL program was $2.3 million and $50 million,
respectively.
BankAtlantics available borrowings from lines of credit
with other banking institutions and access to Treasury
borrowings were $82.7 million as of December 31, 2008.
The following table provides information on federal funds
purchased, TAF and TTL borrowings
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
238,339
|
|
|
|
108,975
|
|
|
|
32,026
|
|
Maximum outstanding at any month end within period
|
|
$
|
238,339
|
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
266,237
|
|
Average amount outstanding during period
|
|
$
|
78,125
|
|
|
|
115,334
|
|
|
|
176,237
|
|
Average interest cost during period
|
|
|
2.23
|
%
|
|
|
5.17
|
%
|
|
|
5.17
|
%
|
F-106
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
21.
|
Securities
Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase represent
transactions where BankAtlantic sells a portion of its current
investment portfolio (usually MBSs and REMICs) at a
negotiated rate and agrees to repurchase the same assets on a
specified future date. BankAtlantic issues repurchase agreements
to institutions and to its customers. These transactions are
collateralized by securities available for sale and investment
securities. Customer repurchase agreements are not insured by
the FDIC. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the outstanding
balances of customer repurchase agreements were
$46.1 million and $58.3 million, respectively. There
were no institutional repurchase agreements outstanding at
December 31, 2008 and 2007. BankAtlantic had
$231 million of un-pledged securities that could be sold or
pledged for additional repurchase agreement borrowings.
The following table provides information on the agreements to
repurchase (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Maximum borrowing at any month-end within the period
|
|
$
|
55,179
|
|
|
|
109,430
|
|
|
|
202,607
|
|
Average borrowing during the period
|
|
$
|
63,529
|
|
|
|
73,848
|
|
|
|
123,944
|
|
Average interest cost during the period
|
|
|
2.23
|
%
|
|
|
4.88
|
|
|
|
4.83
|
|
Average interest cost at end of the period
|
|
|
0.12
|
%
|
|
|
3.46
|
|
|
|
5.17
|
|
The following table lists the amortized cost and estimated fair
value of securities sold under repurchase agreements, and the
repurchase liability associated with such transactions (dollars
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Repurchase
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
December 31, 2008(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
46,689
|
|
|
|
47,896
|
|
|
|
41,387
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
%
|
REMIC
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
46,689
|
|
|
|
47,896
|
|
|
|
41,387
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
30,028
|
|
|
|
30,251
|
|
|
|
23,468
|
|
|
|
3.46
|
%
|
REMIC
|
|
|
37,796
|
|
|
|
35,398
|
|
|
|
27,462
|
|
|
|
3.46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
67,824
|
|
|
|
65,649
|
|
|
|
50,930
|
|
|
|
3.46
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, all securities were
classified as available for sale and were recorded at fair value
in the consolidated statements of financial condition. |
All repurchase agreements existing at December 31, 2008
matured and were repaid in January 2009. These securities were
held by unrelated broker dealers.
F-107
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
22.
|
Subordinated
Debentures, Notes and Bonds Payable, Secured Borrowings, Junior
Subordinated Debentures and Other Liabilities
|
The following subordinated debentures, notes and bonds payable
were outstanding at December 31, 2008 and 2007 (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
Date
|
|
BFC borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving Line of Credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIBOR +2.80
|
|
December 15, 2007
|
Mortgage payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
6.00%
|
|
June 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total BFC borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated debentures(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
|
22,000
|
|
|
LIBOR + 3.45%
|
|
November 7, 2012
|
Mortgage-Backed Bond
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
864
|
|
|
|
4,654
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
September 30, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total BankAtlantic borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,864
|
|
|
|
26,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodbridge Borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land acquisition and development
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
|
140,034
|
|
|
|
136,266
|
|
|
From LIBOR
|
|
Range from June
|
mortgage notes payable
|
|
|
(e
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+2.5% to Fixed
|
|
2011 to October
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.88%
|
|
2019
|
Commercial development
|
|
|
(b
|
)
|
|
|
71,905
|
|
|
|
76,278
|
|
|
From LIBOR +
|
|
Range from June
|
mortgage notes payable
|
|
|
(e
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.70% to Prime
|
|
2009 to July 2010
|
Borrowing base facility
|
|
|
(c
|
)
|
|
|
37,458
|
|
|
|
39,674
|
|
|
Prime
|
|
March 2011
|
Other mortgage notes payable
|
|
|
(d
|
)
|
|
|
11,831
|
|
|
|
12,027
|
|
|
Fixed 5.47%
|
|
April 2015
|
Development Bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,291
|
|
|
|
3,350
|
|
|
Fixed from 6%
|
|
2035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to 6.13%
|
|
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
1,143
|
|
|
Fixed from
2.44% to 9.15%
|
|
Range from July
2009 to June 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Woodbridge borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264,900
|
|
|
|
268,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
287,772
|
|
|
|
295,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
LIBOR interest rates are indexed to
3-month
LIBOR and adjust quarterly. |
|
(2) |
|
The bonds adjust semi-annually to the ten year treasury constant
maturity rate minus 23 basis points. |
|
(a) |
|
Core Communities land acquisition and development mortgage
notes payable are collateralized by inventory of real estate and
property and equipment with approximate net carrying values
aggregating $174.5 million and $159.2 million as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Core has a credit
agreement with a financial institution which provides for
borrowings of up to $88.9 million. This facility matures in
June 2011 and has a loan to value limitation of 55%. As of
December 31, 2008, $86.9 million was outstanding with
no current availability for further borrowing based on available
collateral. Core has a credit agreement with a financial
institution which provides for borrowings of up to
$33.0 million. This facility matures in October 2019. As of
December 31, 2008, $23.2 million was outstanding with
no current availability for further borrowing based on available
collateral. Core has a credit agreement with a financial
institution which provides for borrowing of up to
$5.0 million. This facility matures in October 2019. As of
December 31, 2008, $4.9 million was outstanding, with
no current availability for borrowing based on available
collateral. These notes accrue interest, payable monthly, at
fixed and varying rates and are tied to various indices as noted
above. For certain notes, principal payments are required
monthly or quarterly |
F-108
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
as the note dictates. Core had a $50.0 million revolving
credit facility with a loan to value limitation of 75% for
construction financing for the development of the Tradition
Hilton Head master-planned community which was subsequently
modified in 2008 to $25.0 million. This agreement had a
provision that required additional principal payments, known as
curtailment payments, in the event that actual sales were below
the contractual requirements. A curtailment payment of
$14.9 million was paid in January 2008. On June 27,
2008, Core modified this loan agreement, terminating the
revolving feature of the loan and reducing an approximately
$19 million curtailment payment due in June 2008 to
$17.0 million, $5.0 million of which was paid in June
2008. The loan was further modified in December 2008, reducing
the loan to $25 million, eliminating the curtailment
requirements, extending the loan to February 2012 and increasing
the rate to Prime Rate plus 1%, with a floor of 5.00%, and the
establishment of an interest reserve classified as restricted
cash. As of December 31, 2008, $25.0 million was
outstanding, with no current availability for borrowing based on
available collateral. The facility is due and payable on
February 28, 2012. |
|
(b) |
|
Core Communities has three credit agreements with a financial
institution which provide for borrowings of up to
$80.3 million. As of December 31, 2008,
$71.9 million was outstanding, with no current availability
for further borrowing based on available collateral. These
credit agreements required debt service coverage ratios of up to
1.15. Core also has a credit agreement with a financial
institution which provides for borrowing of up to
$64.3 million. This facility matures in June 2009 and, as
of December 31, 2008 $58.3 million was outstanding
with no current availability for borrowing based on available
collateral. In July 2008, one of these credit agreements was
refinanced by a $9.1 million construction loan. The new
loan has an interest rate of
30-day LIBOR
plus 210 basis points or Prime Rate, a maturity date of
July 2010 with a one year extension subject to certain
conditions and has an outstanding balance of $8.9 million
at December 31, 2008. In 2008, Core extended the maturity
of another $6.9 million credit agreement from June 2008 to
June 2010, which had an outstanding balance of $4.7 million
at December 31, 2008. These notes accrue interest at
varying rates tied to various indices as noted above and
interest is payable monthly. For certain notes, principal
payments are required monthly. Core Communities commercial
development mortgage notes payable are collateralized by
commercial property with approximate net carrying values
aggregating $96.1 million and $103.2 million as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
|
(c) |
|
Levitt and Sons had a $100.0 million revolving working
capital, land acquisition, development and residential
construction borrowing base facility agreement with 75% loan to
value limitation and borrowed $30.2 million under the
facility (the Carolina Oak Loan). The proceeds were
used to finance the inter-company purchase of a 150 acre
parcel in Tradition Hilton Head from Core Communities and to
refinance a $15.0 million line of credit. In October 2007,
in connection with Woodbridges acquisition from Levitt and
Sons of the membership interests in Carolina Oak, Woodbridge
became the obligor for the entire Carolina Oak Loan
$34.1 million outstanding balance at the time of
acquisition. The Carolina Oak Loan was modified in connection
with the acquisition and had an outstanding balance of
$37.5 million at December 31, 2008. The Carolina Oak
Loan is collateralized by a first mortgage on the 150 acre
parcel in Tradition, Hilton Head which had approximate net
carrying values aggregating $27.6 million and
$38.5 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. The Carolina Oak Loan is due and payable on
March 21, 2011 and may be extended at the lenders
sole discretion on the anniversary date of the facility.
Interest accrues at the Prime Rate and is payable monthly. At
December 31, 2008, there was no availability to draw on
this facility based on available collateral. |
|
(d) |
|
Woodbridge entered into a mortgage note payable agreement with a
financial institution in March 2005 to repay the bridge loan
used to temporarily fund Woodbridges purchase of an
office building in Fort Lauderdale. This note payable is
collateralized by the office building which had approximate net
carrying values aggregating $13.7 million and
$14.2 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. The note payable contains a balloon payment
requirements of approximately $10.4 million at the maturity
date in April 2015. Principal and interest are payable monthly. |
F-109
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
(e) |
|
Core Communities credit facilities generally require it to
maintain minimum net worth and minimum working capital levels,
the most restrictive of which is a minimum net worth of
$75 million and minimum liquidity of $7.5 million. |
Some of Woodbridges subsidiaries have borrowings which
contain covenants that, among other things, require the
subsidiary to maintain financial ratios and a minimum net worth.
These requirements may limit the amount of debt that the
subsidiaries can incur in the future and restrict the payment of
dividends from its subsidiaries to Woodbridge Holdings
Corporation. The loan agreements generally require repayment of
specified amounts upon a sale of a portion of the property
collateralizing the debt. The land acquisition and development
mortgage notes payable, commercial development mortgage notes
payable and the borrowing base facility all have loan to value
limitations. The commercial development mortgage notes payable
also have debt service coverage ratio limitations. At
December 31, 2008, Woodbridge was in compliance with all
loan agreement financial requirements and covenants. See
Note 26 for further information relating on Cores
debt covenants.
F-110
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge had the following junior
subordinated debentures outstanding at December 31, 2008
and 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Optional
|
|
|
|
Issue
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
Redemption
|
|
Junior Subordinated Debentures
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
BBX Capital Trust I(A)
|
|
|
06/26/2007
|
|
|
$
|
25,774
|
|
|
|
25,774
|
|
|
LIBOR + 1.45%
|
|
|
09/15/2037
|
|
|
|
09/15/2012
|
|
BBX Capital Trust II(A)
|
|
|
09/20/2007
|
|
|
|
5,155
|
|
|
|
5,155
|
|
|
LIBOR + 1.50%
|
|
|
12/15/2037
|
|
|
|
12/15/2012
|
|
BBX Capital Trust II
|
|
|
03/05/2002
|
|
|
|
57,088
|
|
|
|
57,088
|
|
|
8.50%
|
|
|
03/31/2032
|
|
|
|
03/31/2007
|
|
BBX Capital Trust III
|
|
|
06/26/2002
|
|
|
|
25,774
|
|
|
|
25,774
|
|
|
LIBOR + 3.45%
|
|
|
06/26/2032
|
|
|
|
06/26/2007
|
|
BBX Capital Trust IV
|
|
|
09/26/2002
|
|
|
|
25,774
|
|
|
|
25,774
|
|
|
LIBOR + 3.40%
|
|
|
09/26/2032
|
|
|
|
09/26/2007
|
|
BBX Capital Trust V
|
|
|
09/27/2002
|
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
LIBOR + 3.40%
|
|
|
09/30/2032
|
|
|
|
09/27/2007
|
|
BBX Capital Trust VI
|
|
|
12/10/2002
|
|
|
|
15,450
|
|
|
|
15,450
|
|
|
LIBOR + 3.35%
|
|
|
12/10/2032
|
|
|
|
12/10/2007
|
|
BBX Capital Trust VII
|
|
|
12/19/2002
|
|
|
|
25,774
|
|
|
|
25,774
|
|
|
LIBOR + 3.25%
|
|
|
12/19/2032
|
|
|
|
12/19/2007
|
|
BBX Capital Trust VIII
|
|
|
12/19/2002
|
|
|
|
15,464
|
|
|
|
15,464
|
|
|
LIBOR + 3.35%
|
|
|
01/07/2033
|
|
|
|
12/19/2007
|
|
BBX Capital Trust IX
|
|
|
12/19/2002
|
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
LIBOR + 3.35%
|
|
|
01/07/2033
|
|
|
|
12/19/2007
|
|
BBX Capital Trust X
|
|
|
03/26/2003
|
|
|
|
51,548
|
|
|
|
51,548
|
|
|
LIBOR + 3.15%
|
|
|
03/26/2033
|
|
|
|
03/26/2008
|
|
BBX Capital Trust XI
|
|
|
04/10/2003
|
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
LIBOR + 3.25%
|
|
|
04/24/2033
|
|
|
|
04/24/2008
|
|
BBX Capital Trust XII
|
|
|
03/27/2003
|
|
|
|
15,464
|
|
|
|
15,464
|
|
|
LIBOR + 3.25%
|
|
|
04/07/2033
|
|
|
|
04/07/2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total BankAtlantic Bancorp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,195
|
|
|
|
294,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured junior subordinated debentures Levitt
Capital Trust I (LCT I)
|
|
|
03/15/2005
|
|
|
|
23,196
|
|
|
|
23,196
|
|
|
From fixed
8.11% to
LIBOR + 3.85%
|
|
|
03/01/2035
|
|
|
|
3/15/2010
|
|
Unsecured junior subordinated debentures Levitt
Capital Trust II (LCT II)
|
|
|
05/04/2005
|
|
|
|
30,928
|
|
|
|
30,928
|
|
|
From fixed 8.09% to
LIBOR + 3.80%
|
|
|
06/30/2035
|
|
|
|
05/04/2010
|
|
Unsecured junior subordinated debentures Levitt
Capital Trust III (LCT III)
|
|
|
06/01/2006
|
|
|
|
15,464
|
|
|
|
15,464
|
|
|
From fixed 9.25% to
LIBOR + 3.80%
|
|
|
06/30/2036
|
|
|
|
06/30/2011
|
|
Unsecured junior subordinated debentures Levitt
Capital Trust IV (LCTIV)
|
|
|
07/18/2006
|
|
|
|
15,464
|
|
|
|
15,464
|
|
|
From fixed 9.35% to
LIBOR + 3.80%
|
|
|
09/30/2036
|
|
|
|
09/30/2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Woodbridge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,052
|
|
|
|
85,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase Accounting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,143
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Junior Subordinated Debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
376,104
|
|
|
|
379,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-111
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Annual maturities of junior subordinated debentures and other
debt outstanding at December 31, 2008 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
3,575
|
|
2010
|
|
|
8,713
|
|
2011
|
|
|
188,520
|
|
2012
|
|
|
48,309
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2,129
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
412,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
663,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic
Bancorp Junior Subordinated Debentures
BankAtlantic Bancorp has formed thirteen statutory business
trusts (Trusts) which were formed for the purpose of
issuing Trust Preferred Securities (trust preferred
securities) and investing the proceeds thereof in junior
subordinated debentures of BankAtlantic Bancorp. The trust
preferred securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by
BankAtlantic Bancorp. The Trusts used the proceeds from issuing
trust preferred securities and the issuance of its common
securities to BankAtlantic Bancorp to purchase junior
subordinated debentures from BankAtlantic Bancorp. Interest on
the junior subordinated debentures and distributions on the
trust preferred securities are payable quarterly in arrears.
Distributions on the trust preferred securities are cumulative
and are based upon the liquidation value of the trust preferred
security. BankAtlantic Bancorp has the right, at any time, as
long as there are no continuing events of default, to defer
payments of interest on the junior subordinated debentures for a
period not exceeding 20 consecutive quarters; but not beyond the
stated maturity of the junior subordinated debentures. As of
December 31, 2008 no interest had been deferred. In
February and March 2009, BankAtlantic Bancorp notified the
trustees of the junior subordinated debentures that it has
elected to defer interest payments for the next regularly
scheduled quarterly interest payment dates. The deferral
election will begin with respect to regularly scheduled
quarterly interest payments aggregating $3.9 million that
would otherwise have been made in March and April of 2009.
Interest will continue to accrue on the junior subordinated
debentures and on the deferred interest and BankAtlantic Bancorp
will continue to recognize interest expense in its statement of
operations. During the deferral period, distributions will
likewise be deferred on the trust preferred securities. The
trust preferred securities are subject to mandatory redemption,
in whole or in part, upon repayment of the junior subordinated
debentures at maturity or their earlier redemption. BankAtlantic
Bancorp has the right to redeem the junior subordinated
debentures after five years from issuance and in some instances
sooner. The redemption of the subordinated debentures is subject
to BankAtlantic Bancorp having received regulatory approval, if
required under applicable capital guidelines or regulatory
policies.
BankAtlantic
In October 2002, BankAtlantic issued $22 million of
floating rate subordinated debentures due 2012. The subordinated
debentures pay interest quarterly and are currently redeemable
at a price based upon then-prevailing market interest rates. The
subordinated debentures were issued by BankAtlantic in a private
transaction as part of a larger pooled securities offering. The
subordinated debentures qualify for inclusion in
BankAtlantics total risk based capital.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, the holder of a
mortgage-backed bond issued by a financial institution acquired
by BankAtlantic agreed to accept a $2.8 million payment for
the retirement of $3.1 million
F-112
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
in mortgage-backed bonds. Included in the Companys
Consolidated Statement of Operations in Financial
Services cost associated with debt redemption is a
$0.3 million gain from the early extinguishment of the
mortgage-backed bond. BankAtlantic pledged $3.7 million of
residential loans as collateral for the outstanding balance of
the mortgage-back bond as of December 31, 2008.
BankAtlantic
Bancorp Indentures
The indentures relating to the debentures (including those
related to the junior subordinated debentures) contain certain
customary covenants found in indentures under the
Trust Indenture Act, including covenants with respect to
the payment of principal and interest, maintenance of an office
or agency for administering the debentures, holding of funds for
payments on the debentures in trust, payment by BankAtlantic
Bancorp of taxes and other claims, maintenance by BankAtlantic
Bancorp of its properties and its corporate existence and
delivery of annual certifications to the trustee.
Woodbridge
Junior Subordinated Debentures
Woodbridge formed four statutory business trusts which issued
trust preferred securities to third parties and trust common
securities to Woodbridge and used the proceeds to purchase an
identical amount of junior subordinated debentures from
Woodbridge. Interest on the junior subordinated debentures and
distributions on these trust preferred securities are payable
quarterly in arrears at the fixed rate as described in the above
table until the optional redemption date and thereafter at the
floating rate as specified in the above table until the
corresponding scheduled maturity date. The trust preferred
securities are subject to mandatory redemption, in whole or in
part, upon repayment of the junior subordinated debentures at
maturity or their earlier redemption. The junior subordinated
debentures are redeemable in whole or in part at
Woodbridges option at any time after five years from the
issue date or sooner following certain specified events.
Woodbridge
Development Bonds Payable
In connection with the development of certain of Cores
projects, community development, special assessment or
improvement districts have been established and may utilize
tax-exempt bond financing to fund construction or acquisition of
certain
on-site and
off-site infrastructure improvements near or at these
communities. The obligation to pay principal and interest on the
bonds issued by the districts is assigned to each parcel within
the district, and a priority assessment lien may be placed on
benefited parcels to provide security for the debt service. The
bonds, including interest and redemption premiums, if any, and
the associated priority lien on the property are typically
payable, secured and satisfied by revenues, fees, or assessments
levied on the property benefited. Core is required to pay the
revenues, fees, and assessments levied by the districts on the
properties it still owns that are benefited by the improvements.
Core may also be required to pay down a specified portion of the
bonds at the time each unit or parcel is sold. The costs of
these obligations are capitalized to inventory during the
development period and recognized as cost of sales when the
properties are sold.
Cores bond financing at December 31, 2008 and 2007
consisted of district bonds totaling $218.7 million with
outstanding amounts of approximately $130.5 million and
$82.9 million, respectively. Further, at December 31,
2008 and 2007, there was approximately $82.4 million and
$129.5 million, respectively, available under these bonds
to fund future development expenditures. Bond obligations at
December 31, 2008 mature in 2035 and 2040. As of
December 31, 2008, Core owned approximately 16% of the
property subject to assessments within the community development
district and approximately 91% of the property subject to
assessments within the special assessment district. During the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, Core recorded
approximately $584,000, $1.3 million and $1.7 million,
respectively, in assessments on property owned by it in the
districts. Core is responsible for any assessed amounts until
the underlying property is sold and will continue to be
responsible for the annual assessments if the property is never
sold. In addition, Core
F-113
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
has guaranteed payments for assessments under the district bonds
in Tradition, Florida which would require funding if future
assessments to be allocated to property owners are insufficient
to repay the bonds. Management of Core has evaluated this
exposure based upon the criteria in SFAS No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencies, and has
determined that there have been no substantive changes to the
projected density or land use in the development subject to the
bond which would make it probable that Core would have to fund
future shortfalls in assessments.
In accordance with EITF Issue
No. 91-10,
Accounting for Special Assessments and Tax Increment
Financing, Woodbridge records a liability for the
estimated developer obligations that are fixed and determinable
and user fees that are required to be paid or transferred at the
time the parcel or unit is sold to an end user. At
December 31, 2008 and 2007, the liability related to
developer obligations was $3.3 million at each period end
associated with Cores ownership of the property and is
recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.
BFC
Borrowings
Other
Liabilities
Approximately $4.8 million is included in other liabilities
at December 31, 2008 and 2007 representing amounts due in
connection with the settlement of a class action litigation that
arose in connection with exchange transactions that the Company
entered into in 1989 and 1991. The Company is required to repay
this obligation as settlement holders submit their claims to the
Company. During the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and
2006, the Company paid claims of approximately $10,300, $17,900
and $9,900, respectively, related to this obligation.
|
|
23.
|
Stock
Based Compensation
|
BFCs
Stock Option Plans and Restricted Stock
BFC (without consideration or reference to BankAtlantic Bancorp
and Woodbridge) has a stock based compensation plan (the
2005 Stock Incentive Plan) under which restricted
unvested stock, incentive stock options and non-qualifying stock
options are awarded. Under the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, up to
3,000,000 shares of Class A Common Stock may be issued
through restricted stock awards and upon the exercise of options
granted under the Plan. BFC may grant incentive stock options
only to its employees (as defined in the 2005 Stock Incentive
Plan). BFC may grant non-qualified stock options and restricted
stock awards to directors, independent contractors and agents as
well as employees.
BFC also had a stock based compensation plan (1993
Plan) which expired in 2004. No future grants can be made
under the 1993 Plan; however, any previously issued options
granted under that plan remain effective until either they
expire, are forfeited or are exercised. BFCs 1993 Plan
provided for the grant of stock options to purchase shares of
BFCs Class B Common Stock. The 1993 Plan provided for
the grant of both incentive stock options and non-qualifying
options and the maximum term of the options was ten years.
Share-based compensation costs are recognized based on the grant
date fair value. The grant date fair value for stock options is
calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model net of
an estimated forfeitures rate and recognizes the compensation
costs for those options expected to vest on a straight-line
basis over the requisite service period of the award, which is
generally the option vesting term of five years. BFC based its
estimated forfeiture rate of its unvested options on its
historical experience.
Assumptions used in estimating the fair value of employee
options granted subsequent to January 1, 2006 were
formulated in accordance with guidance under SFAS 123R and
the guidance provided by the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) in Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107
(SAB 107). As part of this assessment,
management determined that volatility should be based on the
Companys Class A Common Stock
F-114
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
and derived from historical price volatility using prices for
the period after the Class A Common Stock began trading on
the NASDAQ National Market (the Class A Common Stock
currently trades on Pink Sheets Electronic OTC Markets) through
the grant date. The expected term of an option is an estimate as
to how long the option will remain outstanding based upon
managements expectation of employee exercise and
post-vesting forfeiture behavior. Because there were no
recognizable patterns, the simplified guidance in SAB 107
was used to determine the estimated term of options issued
subsequent to the adoption of SFAS 123R. Based on this
guidance, the term was estimated to be the midpoint of the
vesting term and the contractual term. The estimate of a
risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury
implied yield curve in effect at the time of grant with a
remaining term equal to the expected term. BFC has never paid
cash dividends and does not currently intend to pay cash
dividends, and therefore a 0% dividend yield was assumed.
The option model used to calculate the fair value of the options
granted was the Black-Scholes model. The table below presents
the weighted average assumptions used to value options granted
to employees and non-employee directors. No options were granted
to employees for the year ended December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
for the Twelve Months Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Employees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
43.05
|
%
|
|
|
44.22
|
%
|
Expected dividends
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
Average risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
4.94
|
%
|
|
|
5.01
|
%
|
Option value
|
|
$
|
2.34
|
|
|
$
|
3.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
for the Twelve Months Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Non-Employees-Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
50.81
|
%
|
|
|
43.05
|
%
|
Expected dividends
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
Risk-free rate
|
|
|
3.35
|
%
|
|
|
4.89
|
%
|
Option value
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
1.99
|
|
F-115
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table sets forth information on outstanding
options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Value ($000)
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
5,299,569
|
|
|
$
|
2.92
|
|
|
|
3.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(3,928,982
|
)
|
|
|
2.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
236,500
|
|
|
|
6.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
1,607,087
|
|
|
$
|
4.88
|
|
|
|
6.25
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(129,769
|
)
|
|
|
1.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(18,397
|
)
|
|
|
4.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
264,296
|
|
|
|
4.44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,723,217
|
|
|
$
|
5.07
|
|
|
|
6.31
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(30,000
|
)
|
|
|
6.04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(147,407
|
)
|
|
|
3.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
252,150
|
|
|
|
0.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,797,960
|
|
|
$
|
4.57
|
|
|
|
6.35
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
881,158
|
|
|
$
|
1.89
|
|
|
|
5.83
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for grant at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
2,015,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted
during 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $0.40, $2.34, and $3.54,
respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised
during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006
was $0, $328,000 and $13.6 million, respectively.
Total unearned compensation cost related to BFCs unvested
stock options was $1.2 million at December 31, 2008.
The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average
period of 1.77 years.
In 2007, BFC received net proceeds of approximately $188,000
upon the exercise of stock options. In 2006,
1,278,985 shares of BFC Class A Common Stock with a
fair value of $7.4 million and 1,068,572 shares of BFC
Class B Common Stock with a fair value of
$5.9 million, were accepted by BFC as consideration for the
exercise price of stock options and optionees minimum
statutory withholding taxes related to option exercises. No
options were exercised for the year ended December 31, 2008.
In accordance with SFAS 123R, excess tax benefits are
recognized in the financial statements upon actual realization
of the related tax benefit. At December 31, 2008,
BFCs excess tax benefit of approximately $4.7 million
was not recognized and will not be recognized until such
deductions are utilized to reduce taxes payable.
F-116
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following is a summary of BFCs restricted stock
activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Unvested
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
11,262
|
|
|
$
|
5.52
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
30,028
|
|
|
|
6.66
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(26,276
|
)
|
|
|
6.29
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
15,014
|
|
|
$
|
6.65
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
22,522
|
|
|
|
4.44
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(28,152
|
)
|
|
|
3.71
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
9,384
|
|
|
$
|
5.62
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
120,480
|
|
|
|
0.83
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(79,664
|
)
|
|
|
0.60
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
50,200
|
|
|
$
|
1.26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BFC recognized vested restricted stock compensation cost of
approximately $100,000, $158,000 and $200,000 for the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 respectively.
In June 2008, the Board of Directors granted to non-employee
directors 120,480 shares of restricted stock under the 2005
Stock Incentive Plan. Restricted stock was granted in
Class A Common Stock and vests monthly over the
twelve-month service period. The fair value of the
120,480 shares of restricted stock granted on June 2,
2008 was approximately $100,000, and the cost is expected to be
recognized over the 12 month service period from June 2008
through May 2009.
BankAtlantic
Bancorp Restricted Stock and Stock Option
Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Option Plans
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Shares
|
|
Class of
|
|
Vesting
|
|
Type of
|
|
|
Term
|
|
Authorized(3)
|
|
Stock
|
|
Requirements
|
|
Options(2)
|
|
1996 Stock Option Plan
|
|
|
10 years
|
|
|
|
449,219
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
|
5 Years(1
|
)
|
|
|
ISO, NQ
|
|
1999 Non-qualifying Stock Option Plan
|
|
|
10 years
|
|
|
|
172,500
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
NQ
|
|
1999 Stock Option Plan
|
|
|
10 years
|
|
|
|
172,500
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
ISO, NQ
|
|
2000 Non-qualifying Stock Option Plan
|
|
|
10 years
|
|
|
|
340,830
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
|
immediately
|
|
|
|
NQ
|
|
2001 Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan
|
|
|
10 years
|
|
|
|
783,778
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
|
5 Years(1
|
)
|
|
|
ISO, NQ
|
|
2005 Restricted Stock and Option Plan(4)
|
|
|
10 years
|
|
|
|
1,200,000
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
|
5 Years(1
|
)
|
|
|
ISO, NQ
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Vesting is established by the BankAtlantic Bancorp Compensation
Committee in connection with each grant of options or restricted
stock. All directors stock options vest immediately. |
|
(2) |
|
ISO Incentive Stock Option
NQ Non-qualifying Stock Option |
F-117
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
(3) |
|
During 2001 all shares remaining available for grant under all
stock options plans except the 2001 stock option plan were
canceled. During 2005 all shares remaining available for grant
under the 2001 stock option plan were canceled. |
|
(4) |
|
The 2005 Restricted Stock and Option Plan provides that up to
1,200,000 shares of BankAtlantic Bancorp Class A
common stock may be issued for restricted stock awards and upon
the exercise of options granted under the Plan. |
The following is a summary of BankAtlantic Bancorps
Class A restricted stock activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Non-vested
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Grant date
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
26,527
|
|
|
$
|
40.00
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(6,965
|
)
|
|
|
55.60
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
6,278
|
|
|
|
73.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
25,840
|
|
|
|
43.95
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(7,583
|
)
|
|
|
48.93
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
12,432
|
|
|
|
42.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
30,689
|
|
|
|
42.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(10,295
|
)
|
|
|
33.77
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
5,455
|
|
|
|
9.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
25,849
|
|
|
$
|
38.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008, approximately $0.7 million of
total unrecognized compensation cost was related to non-vested
restricted stock compensation. The cost is expected to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately
2 years. The fair value of shares vested during the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was
$0.1 million, $0.4 million and $0.6 million,
respectively.
BankAtlantic Bancorp formulated its assumptions used in
estimating the fair value of its employee options granted
subsequent to January 1, 2006 in accordance with guidance
under SFAS 123R and the guidance provided by the SEC in
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 110
(SAB 110). As part of this assessment,
management determined that the historical volatility of
BankAtlantic Bancorps stock should be adjusted to reflect
the spin-off of Levitt Corporation (Levitt) on
December 31, 2003 because BankAtlantic Bancorps
historical volatility prior to the Levitt spin-off was not a
good indicator of future volatility. Management reviewed
BankAtlantic Bancorps stock volatility subsequent to the
Levitt spin-off along with the stock volatility of other
companies in its peer group. Based on this information,
management determined that BankAtlantic Bancorps stock
volatility was similar to its peer group subsequent to the
Levitt spin-off. As a consequence, management estimates
BankAtlantic Bancorps stock volatility over the estimated
life of the stock options granted using peer group experiences
instead of BankAtlantic Bancorps historical data for the
years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006. During the year
ended December 31, 2008, BankAtlantic Bancorps stock
price exhibited higher volatility than its peer group. As a
consequence, BankAtlantic Bancorp began using its historical
volatility as an indicator of future volatility. As part of its
adoption of SFAS 123R, BankAtlantic Bancorp examined its
historical pattern of option exercises in an effort to determine
if there were any patterns based on certain employee
populations. From this analysis, BankAtlantic Bancorp could not
identify any employee population patterns in the exercise of its
options. As such, BankAtlantic Bancorp used
F-118
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
the guidance of SAB 107 to determine the estimated term of
options issued subsequent to the adoption of SFAS 123R.
Based on this guidance, the estimated term was deemed to be the
midpoint of the vesting term and the contractual term ((vesting
term + original contractual term)/2).
The table below presents the weighted average assumptions used
to value options granted to BankAtlantic Bancorp employees and
directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Volatility
|
|
|
46.09
|
%
|
|
|
29.44
|
%
|
|
|
31.44
|
%
|
Expected dividends
|
|
|
1.03
|
%
|
|
|
1.75
|
%
|
|
|
1.03
|
%
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
|
|
7.23
|
|
|
|
7.45
|
|
Risk-free rate
|
|
|
3.29
|
%
|
|
|
4.92
|
%
|
|
|
5.19
|
%
|
The following is a summary of BankAtlantic Bancorps
Class A common stock option activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Value ($000)
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
1,207,851
|
|
|
$
|
45.40
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(291,948
|
)
|
|
|
20.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(51,955
|
)
|
|
|
67.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(6,420
|
)
|
|
|
46.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
190,254
|
|
|
|
73.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
1,047,782
|
|
|
|
56.45
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(88,227
|
)
|
|
|
27.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(75,486
|
)
|
|
|
67.95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(15,820
|
)
|
|
|
59.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
196,249
|
|
|
|
46.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,064,498
|
|
|
|
56.17
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(6,630
|
)
|
|
|
15.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(126,678
|
)
|
|
|
74.81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(111,526
|
)
|
|
|
30.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
75,954
|
|
|
|
9.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
895,618
|
|
|
|
53.09
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
441,589
|
|
|
$
|
31.87
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for grant at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
704,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted
during the years 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $3.95, $16.00, and
$29.95, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options
exercised during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007,
and 2006, was $25,000, $2.1 million and $14.0 million,
respectively.
Total unearned compensation cost related to BankAtlantic
Bancorps nonvested Class A common stock options was
$4.3 million at December 31, 2008. The cost is
expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
2.2 years.
F-119
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Included in the Companys Statement of Operations in
Financial Services compensation expense was $1.8 million,
$4.5 million and $5.1 million of share-based
compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006, respectively. The recognized tax benefit
associated with the compensation expense was $0,
$1.8 million and $0.8 million for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Woodbridge
Restricted Stock and Stock Option Plan
On May 11, 2004, Woodbridges shareholders approved
the 2003 Levitt Corporation Stock Incentive Plan. In March 2006,
subject to shareholder approval, the Board of Directors of
Woodbridge approved the amendment and restatement of
Woodbridges 2003 Stock Incentive Plan to increase the
maximum number of shares of Woodbridges Class A
common stock, $0.01 par value, that may be issued for
restricted stock awards and upon the exercise of options under
the plan from 1,500,000 to 3,000,000 shares.
Woodbridges shareholders approved the Amended and Restated
2003 Stock Incentive Plan (Incentive Plan) on
May 16, 2006.
The maximum term of options granted under the Incentive Plan is
10 years. The vesting period for each grant is established
by Woodbridges Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors. The vesting period for employees is generally five
years utilizing cliff vesting. All options granted to directors
vest immediately. Option awards issued to date become
exercisable based solely on fulfilling a service condition.
Since the inception of the Incentive Plan there have been no
expired stock options.
Stock option activity under the Incentive Plan for the years
ended December 31, 2007 and 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
of Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Thousands)
|
|
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
378,521
|
|
|
$
|
103.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
150,489
|
|
|
|
45.92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
156,478
|
|
|
|
88.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
372,532
|
|
|
$
|
86.66
|
|
|
|
8.00 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
36,398
|
|
|
|
6.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
90,459
|
|
|
|
81.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
318,471
|
|
|
$
|
78.89
|
|
|
|
7.19 years
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
69,822
|
|
|
$
|
40.20
|
|
|
|
8.36 years
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options available for equity compensation grants at
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
281,529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-120
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of
the grant using the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
65.47%
|
|
40.05% - 52.59%
|
|
37.37% - 39.80%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
0.00%
|
|
0.00% - 0.83%
|
|
0.39% - 0.61%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
4.16%
|
|
4.58% - 5.14%
|
|
4.57% - 5.06%
|
Expected life
|
|
5 years
|
|
5 7.5 years
|
|
5 7.5 years
|
Forfeiture rate executives
|
|
5%
|
|
5%
|
|
5%
|
Forfeiture rate non-executives
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
10%
|
Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of
Woodbridges stock. Due to the short period of time
Woodbridge has been publicly traded, the historical volatilities
of similar publicly traded entities are reviewed to validate
Woodbridges expected volatility assumption. The expected
dividend yield is based on an expected quarterly dividend.
Historically, forfeiture rates were estimated based on
historical employee turnover rates. In 2007, there were
substantial forfeitures as a result of the reductions in force
related to the bankruptcy of Levitt and Sons. See Note 6
for further explanation. As a result, Woodbridge adjusted their
stock compensation to reflect actual forfeitures. In accordance
with SFAS No. 123R, companies are required to adjust
forfeiture estimates for all awards with performance and service
conditions through the vesting date so that compensation cost is
recognized only for awards that vest. During the year ended
December 31, 2008, there were substantial pre-vesting
forfeitures as a result of the reductions in force related to
Woodbridges restructurings and the bankruptcy of Levitt
and Sons. In accordance with SFAS No. 123R,
pre-vesting forfeitures result in a reversal of compensation
cost whereas a post-vesting cancellation would not.
Non-cash stock compensation expense for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 related to unvested stock
options amounted to $840,000, $1.9 million and
$3.1 million, respectively, with an expected or estimated
income tax benefit of $548,000, $578,000 and $849,000
respectively. Non-cash stock compensation expense for the years
ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 include
$2.1 million and $3.5 million, respectively, of
amortization of stock option compensation offset by
$1.3 million and $1.6 million, respectively of a
reversal of stock compensation previously expensed related to
forfeited options. Additionally during 2007, Woodbridge recorded
$231,000 of tax benefit related to employees exercising stock
options to acquire shares of BankAtlantic Bancorps
Class A common stock which was granted to Woodbridges
employees before Woodbridge was spun off from Bancorp.
At December 31, 2008, Woodbridge had approximately
$2.4 million of unrecognized stock compensation expense
related to outstanding stock option awards which is expected to
be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.3 years.
F-121
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
A summary of Woodbridges non-vested stock option activity
for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008 was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Number of Options
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Contractual Term
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
358,660
|
|
|
$
|
103.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Grants
|
|
|
150,489
|
|
|
|
45.92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
13,563
|
|
|
|
45.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
156,478
|
|
|
|
88.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
339,108
|
|
|
|
87.64
|
|
|
|
7.98 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grants
|
|
|
36,398
|
|
|
|
6.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
36,398
|
|
|
|
6.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
90,459
|
|
|
|
81.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
248,649
|
|
|
$
|
89.75
|
|
|
|
6.86 years
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodbridge also grants shares of restricted Class A Common
Stock, valued based on the market price of such stock on the
date of grant. Restricted stock is issued primarily to
Woodbridges directors and typically vests in equal monthly
installments over a one-year period. Compensation expense
arising from restricted stock grants is recognized using the
straight-line method over the vesting period. Unearned
compensation for restricted stock is a component of additional
paid-in capital in shareholders equity in the consolidated
statements of financial condition. During the year ended
December 31, 2007, Woodbridge granted 1,529 restricted
shares of Class A common stock to non-employee directors
under the Incentive Plan, having a market price on the date of
grant of $45.80 per share. During the year ended
December 31, 2008, Woodbridge granted 31,345 restricted
shares of Class A common stock to non-employee directors
under the Incentive Plan, having a market price on the date of
grant of $6.70 per share. The restricted stock vests monthly
over a 12 month period. Non-cash stock compensation expense
for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
related to restricted stock awards amounted to $152,000, $81,000
and $150,000, respectively.
|
|
24.
|
Pension,
Profit Sharing Plan, 401(k) Plans and Deferred Retirement
Agreement
|
BFC
BFC
Defined Contribution 401(k) Plan
During 2006, the BFC 401(k) Plan was merged into the
BankAtlantic Security Plus 401(k) Plan. The BankAtlantic 401(k)
Plan is a defined contribution plan established pursuant to
Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Employees who
have completed 90 days of service and have reached the age
of 18 are eligible to participate. During 2008 and 2007,
employer match was 100% of the first 3% of employee
contributions and 50% of the next 2% of employee contributions.
During the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the
Companys contributions amounted to $118,000 and $146,000,
respectively.
BFC
Deferred Retirement Agreement
On September 13, 2005, the Company entered into an
agreement with Glen R. Gilbert, the Companys former Chief
Financial Officer, pursuant to which the Company agreed to pay
him a monthly retirement benefit of $5,672 beginning
January 1, 2010, regardless of his actual retirement date.
Mr. Gilbert retired as Chief Financial Officer on
March 29, 2007. On September 13, 2005, as actuarially
determined, BFC recorded the present value of the retirement
benefit payment in the amount of $482,444 based upon the monthly
retirement benefit of $5,672 payable as a life annuity with 120
payments at 6.5% interest. The interest on the
F-122
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
retirement benefit is recognized monthly as compensation
expense. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the deferred
retirement obligation balance was approximately $599,000 and
$561,000, respectively, which represents the present value of
accumulated benefit obligation and is included in Other
Liabilities in the Companys consolidated statements of
financial condition. The compensation expense for the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was approximately
$38,000, $35,000 and $33,000, respectively, and is included in
BFC Activities Employee Compensation and Benefits in the
Companys consolidated statements of operations.
BankAtlantic
Bancorp
Defined
Benefit Pension
Plan:
At December 31, 1998, BankAtlantic froze its defined
benefit pension plan (the Plan). All participants in
the Plan ceased accruing service benefits beyond that date and
became vested. BankAtlantic Bancorp is subject to future pension
expense or income based on future actual plan returns and
actuarial values of the Plan obligations to employees.
The following tables set forth BankAtlantic Plans change
in benefit obligation and change in Plan assets at
December 31, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Change in benefit obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at the beginning of the year
|
|
$
|
28,918
|
|
|
|
29,620
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,720
|
|
|
|
1,656
|
|
Actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
1,549
|
|
|
|
(1,403
|
)
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(1,037
|
)
|
|
|
(955
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
|
31,150
|
|
|
|
28,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of Plan assets at the beginning of year
|
|
|
29,104
|
|
|
|
28,626
|
|
Actual return on Plan assets
|
|
|
(10,146
|
)
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
Employer contribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(1,037
|
)
|
|
|
(955
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of Plan assets as of actuarial date
|
|
|
17,921
|
|
|
|
29,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status at end of year
|
|
$
|
(13,229
|
)
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the Companys Statement of Financial Condition
in other liabilities as of December 31, 2008 was
$13.2 million representing the under-funded pension plan
amount as of that date. Included in other assets as of
December 31, 2007 was $0.2 million representing the
over-funded pension plan amount as of that date.
Amounts recognized in BankAtlantic Bancorp accumulated other
comprehensive income without consideration to BFCs
noncontrolling interest consisted of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Net comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
19,690
|
|
|
|
3,915
|
|
|
|
4,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-123
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Other information about the Plan is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
31,150
|
|
|
|
28,918
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
|
31,150
|
|
|
|
28,918
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
17,921
|
|
|
|
29,104
|
|
The table below provides the components of net periodic benefit
cost and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive income
excluding BFCs noncontrolling interest (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
1,719
|
|
|
|
1,656
|
|
|
|
1,624
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(2,430
|
)
|
|
|
(2,396
|
)
|
|
|
(2,190
|
)
|
Amortization of unrecognized net gains and losses
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension (income) expense(1)
|
|
$
|
(248
|
)
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations
Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in funding status
|
|
|
(13,415
|
)
|
|
|
1,180
|
|
|
|
2,236
|
|
Change in deferred tax assets
|
|
|
(2,112
|
)
|
|
|
(363
|
)
|
|
|
(1,204
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized net periodic benefit cost and other
comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
(15,775
|
)
|
|
|
578
|
|
|
|
1,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The estimated net loss for the Plan that will be amortized from
accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit
cost over the next fiscal year is $1.6 million. |
The actuarial assumptions used in accounting for the Plan were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Weighted average discount rate used to determine benefit
obligation
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
Weighted average discount rate used to to determine net periodic
benefit cost
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
Rate of increase in future compensation levels
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Expected long-term rate of return
|
|
|
8.50
|
%
|
|
|
8.50
|
%
|
|
|
8.50
|
%
|
Actuarial estimates and assumptions are based on various market
factors and are evaluated on an annual basis, and changes in
such assumptions may impact future pension costs. The discount
rate assumption is based on rates of high quality corporate
bonds. The interest rates of high quality corporate bonds
remained unchanged from December 31, 2007. The increase in
the discount rate at December 31, 2007 reflects higher
corporate bond rates at December 31, 2007 compared to
corporate bond rates at December 31, 2006. The expected
long-term rate of return was estimated using historical
long-term returns based on the expected asset allocations.
Current participant data was used for the actuarial assumptions
for each of the three years ended December 31, 2008.
BankAtlantic did not make any contributions to its Plan during
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.
BankAtlantic will be required to contribute $1.6 million to
its Plan for the year ended December 31, 2009.
F-124
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The Plans investment policies and strategies are to invest
in mutual funds that are rated with at least a
3-star
rating awarded by Morningstar at the initial purchase. If a
funds Morningstar rating falls below a 3-star rating after
an initial purchase, it is closely monitored to ensure that its
under-performance can be attributed to market conditions rather
than fund management deficiencies. Fund manager changes or
changes in fund objectives could be cause for replacement of any
mutual fund. The Plan also maintains an aggressive growth
investment category which includes investments in equity
securities and mutual funds. Both public and private securities
are eligible for this category of investment, but no more than
5% of total Plan assets at the time of the initial investment
may be invested in any one company. Beyond the initial cost
limitation (5% at time of purchase), there will be no limitation
as to the percentage that any one investment can represent if it
is achieved through growth. As a means to reduce negative market
volatility, and to invoke a sell discipline for concentrated
positions, the Plan has a strategy of selling call options
against certain stock positions within the portfolio when
considered timely. At December 31, 2008, 3.3% of the
Plans assets were invested in the aggressive growth
category.
The Plans targeted asset allocation was 72% equity
securities, 25% debt securities and 3% cash during the year
ended December 31, 2008. A rebalancing of the portfolio
takes place on a quarterly basis when there has been a 5% or
greater change from the prevailing benchmark allocation.
The fair values of the Plans assets by asset category are
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
|
|
in Active Markets
|
|
|
|
for Identical
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
Asset Category
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
382
|
|
Mutual Funds:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
US Large Cap Growth
|
|
|
1,581
|
|
US Large Cap Value
|
|
|
758
|
|
US Large Cap Blend
|
|
|
1,680
|
|
US Mid-Cap Growth
|
|
|
450
|
|
US Mid-Cap Value
|
|
|
811
|
|
US Mid-Cap Blend
|
|
|
638
|
|
International Equity
|
|
|
2,784
|
|
Balanced
|
|
|
8,235
|
|
Common Stock(2)
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pension assets
|
|
$
|
17,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Plan maintains diversified mutual funds in order to
diversify risks and reduce volatility while achieving the
targeted asset mix. |
|
(2) |
|
This category invests in aggressive growth common stocks. |
The pension assets were measured using the market valuation
technique with level 1 input. Quotes market prices are
available for identical securities for the mutual funds and
common stock and all the pension assets trade in active markets.
F-125
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following benefit payments are expected to be paid (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
Expected Future Service
|
|
Benefits
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
1,269
|
|
2010
|
|
|
1,480
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,515
|
|
2012
|
|
|
1,570
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,659
|
|
Years
2014-2018
|
|
|
9,847
|
|
Defined
Contribution 401(k)
Plan:
The table below outlines the terms of the Security Plus 401(k)
Plan and the associated employer costs (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Employee salary contribution Limit(1)
|
|
$
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Percentage of salary limitation
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
Total match contribution(2)
|
|
$
|
2,551
|
|
|
|
2,930
|
|
|
|
2,461
|
|
Vesting of employer match
|
|
|
Immediate
|
|
|
|
Immediate
|
|
|
|
Immediate
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For the year ended December 31, 2008, employees over the
age of 50 were entitled to contribute $20,500. For each of the
years in the two year period ended December 31, 2007,
employees over the age of 50 were entitled to contribute $20,000. |
|
(2) |
|
The employer matched 100% of the first 3% of employee
contributions and 50% of the next 2% of employee contributions. |
BankAtlantic
Bancorp Profit Sharing Plan and 2008 Expense Reduction
Initiative
BankAtlantic Bancorp established the Profit Sharing Stretch Plan
for all employees of BankAtlantic Bancorp and its subsidiaries.
The profit sharing awards were paid in cash quarterly during the
years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 and these awards
were subject to achieving specific performance goals. During the
year ended December 31, 2008, BankAtlantic Bancorp replaced
the profit sharing plan with the 2008 Expense Reduction
Initiative for all non-executive employees of BankAtlantic
Bancorp and its subsidiaries. The awards were subject to
achieving certain expense reduction targets. Included in
Financial Services employee compensation and
benefits in the consolidated statement of operations during the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was
$2.2 million, $2.0 million and $4.4 million,
respectively, of expenses associated with these plans.
Woodbridge
Woodbridge has a defined contribution plan established pursuant
to Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Employees
who have completed three months of service and have reached the
age of 18 are eligible to participate. During the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, Woodbridges
contributions to the plan amounted to $302,000,
$1.1 million, and $1.3 million, respectively. These
amounts are included in Real Estate Development
selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations.
F-126
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The provision (benefit) for income taxes consisted of (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Continuing operations
|
|
$
|
15,763
|
|
|
|
(69,012
|
)
|
|
|
(530
|
)
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,472
|
)
|
|
|
(8,957
|
)
|
Extraordinary items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
$
|
15,763
|
|
|
|
(70,975
|
)
|
|
|
(9,487
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
(2,880
|
)
|
|
|
(33,941
|
)
|
|
|
13,511
|
|
State
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,881
|
)
|
|
|
(33,939
|
)
|
|
|
14,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
14,308
|
|
|
|
(28,281
|
)
|
|
|
(13,977
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
4,336
|
|
|
|
(6,792
|
)
|
|
|
(1,010
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,644
|
|
|
|
(35,073
|
)
|
|
|
(14,987
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
$
|
15,763
|
|
|
|
(69,012
|
)
|
|
|
(530
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys actual provision (benefit) for income taxes
from continuing operations differ from the Federal expected
income tax provision as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008(1)
|
|
|
2007(1)
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
|
Income tax provision at expected federal income tax rate of 35%
|
|
$
|
(115,309
|
)
|
|
|
(35.00
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(112,377
|
)
|
|
|
(35.00
|
)%
|
|
$
|
4,263
|
|
|
|
35.00
|
%
|
Increase (decrease) resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes related to subsidiaries not consolidated for income tax
purposes
|
|
|
(43,000
|
)
|
|
|
(13.05
|
)
|
|
|
(16,263
|
)
|
|
|
(5.07
|
)
|
|
|
1,508
|
|
|
|
12.38
|
|
Provision (benefit) for state taxes, net of federal effect
|
|
|
(12,949
|
)
|
|
|
(3.93
|
)
|
|
|
(14,510
|
)
|
|
|
(4.52
|
)
|
|
|
(939
|
)
|
|
|
(7.71
|
)
|
Increase in valuation allowance
|
|
|
190,516
|
|
|
|
57.83
|
|
|
|
77,586
|
|
|
|
24.16
|
|
|
|
1,694
|
|
|
|
13.91
|
|
Expired NOLs
|
|
|
1,281
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
1,595
|
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from Levitt and Sons
|
|
|
(20,981
|
)
|
|
|
(6.37
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill impairment adjustment
|
|
|
16,899
|
|
|
|
5.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
458
|
|
|
|
3.76
|
|
Tax-exempt interest income
|
|
|
(152
|
)
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
(4,180
|
)
|
|
|
(1.30
|
)
|
|
|
(5,110
|
)
|
|
|
(41.96
|
)
|
Other net
|
|
|
(542
|
)
|
|
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
|
(863
|
)
|
|
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
|
(2,404
|
)
|
|
|
(19.74
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
15,763
|
|
|
|
4.78
|
%
|
|
$
|
(69,012
|
)
|
|
|
(21.49
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(530
|
)
|
|
|
(4.35
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Expected tax is computed based upon income (loss) from
continuing operations before noncontrolling interest. |
F-127
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to
significant portions of the deferred tax assets and tax
liabilities were (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loans, REO, tax certificate losses and other
reserves, for financial statement purposes
|
|
$
|
49,642
|
|
|
|
38,786
|
|
|
|
20,546
|
|
Federal and State net operating loss carryforward
|
|
|
141,113
|
|
|
|
51,645
|
|
|
|
30,191
|
|
Investment in Levitt and Sons
|
|
|
46,393
|
|
|
|
68,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expensed for books and deferred for tax purposes
|
|
|
779
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
13,099
|
|
Real estate held for development and sale capitalized costs for
tax purposes in excess of amounts capitalized for financial
statement purposes
|
|
|
1,204
|
|
|
|
2,358
|
|
|
|
6,579
|
|
Real estate valuation
|
|
|
1,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,889
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
2,906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
896
|
|
Share based compensation
|
|
|
3,982
|
|
|
|
3,073
|
|
|
|
1,922
|
|
Income recognized for tax purposes and deferred for financial
statement purposes
|
|
|
7,510
|
|
|
|
7,228
|
|
|
|
6,949
|
|
Investment in securities
|
|
|
5,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in Bluegreen
|
|
|
11,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
10,337
|
|
|
|
8,715
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
282,261
|
|
|
|
180,554
|
|
|
|
98,071
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(272,765
|
)
|
|
|
(84,028
|
)
|
|
|
(5,035
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
9,496
|
|
|
|
96,526
|
|
|
|
93,036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries not consolidated for income tax purposes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,592
|
|
|
|
55,404
|
|
Investment in Bluegreen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,768
|
|
|
|
19,501
|
|
Deferred loan income
|
|
|
1,468
|
|
|
|
1,993
|
|
|
|
1,956
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
2,830
|
|
|
|
1,929
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,618
|
|
|
|
853
|
|
Prepaid pension expense
|
|
|
2,625
|
|
|
|
2,530
|
|
|
|
2,438
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
3,073
|
|
|
|
3,789
|
|
|
|
3,670
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,903
|
|
|
|
4,077
|
|
|
|
1,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
9,496
|
|
|
|
80,198
|
|
|
|
87,269
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,329
|
|
|
|
5,768
|
|
Less net deferred tax asset at beginning of period
|
|
|
(16,329
|
)
|
|
|
(5,768
|
)
|
|
|
10,693
|
|
Net deferred tax liability acquired due to purchase accounting
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
1,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implementation of FIN 48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,798
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in deferred tax liability from subsidiaries
other capital transactions
|
|
|
2,009
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
Reduction in deferred tax asset associated with Stifel Ryan Beck
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in BFCs accumulated other
comprehensive income
|
|
|
(981
|
)
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
Increase in Woodbridges accumulated other comprehensive
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
894
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
(Decrease) increase in BankAtlantic Bancorp accumulated other
comprehensive income
|
|
|
(3,304
|
)
|
|
|
4,200
|
|
|
|
3,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Provision) benefit for deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(18,644
|
)
|
|
|
32,424
|
|
|
|
20,625
|
|
Less: Provision (benefit) for deferred income taxes
discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,139
|
|
|
|
(5,638
|
)
|
Less: Provision for deferred income taxes
extraordinary income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for deferred income taxes
continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(18,644
|
)
|
|
|
35,073
|
|
|
|
14,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-128
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Activity in the deferred tax asset valuation allowance was (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
84,028
|
|
|
|
5,035
|
|
|
|
3,341
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(2,538
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in deferred tax valuation allowance
|
|
|
190,516
|
|
|
|
77,586
|
|
|
|
1,694
|
|
Increase in deferred tax allowance paid in capital
|
|
|
759
|
|
|
|
1,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
272,765
|
|
|
|
84,028
|
|
|
|
5,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In accordance with SFAS No. 109, BFC and its
subsidiaries, BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge, evaluated
their deferred tax assets to determine if valuation allowances
were required. In the evaluation, management considers taxable
loss carry back availability, expectations of sufficient future
taxable income, trends in earnings, existence of taxable income
in recent years, the future reversal of temporary differences,
and available tax planning strategies that could be implemented,
if required. SFAS No. 109 requires that companies
assess whether valuation allowances should be established based
on the consideration of all available evidence using a more
likely than not standard. Based on evaluations, deferred tax
valuation allowances of $28.3 million, $90.3 million
and $154.1 million were established against the BFC,
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge, respectively, net deferred
tax assets as of December 31, 2008. The deferred tax asset
valuation would be reversed when each of the companies and their
respective subsidiaries generate sufficient taxable income in
the future to utilize the tax benefits of the related deferred
tax assets.
At December 31, 2007 and 2006, Woodbridge established a
valuation allowance of $78.6 million and $0, respectively.
BankAtlantic Bancorp established a valuation allowance of
$5.4 million and $4.6 million during the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, as it was
BankAtlantic Bancorp managements assessment that certain
State net operating loss (NOL) carry-forwards
included in deferred tax assets will not be realized.
BankAtlantic Bancorp files separate State income tax returns in
each State jurisdiction. Certain of BankAtlantic Bancorps
subsidiaries have incurred significant taxable losses for
sustained periods. As a consequence, management believed that it
was more-likely-than-not that the State NOL carry forwards
associated with these companies will not be realized.
BankAtlantic Bancorps deferred tax assets of approximately
$7.2 million for which it has not established a valuation
allowance relate to amounts that can be realized through future
reversals of existing taxable temporary differences or through
carry-backs to the 2006 tax year. As of December 31, 2008,
deferred tax assets includes $98.6 million of BankAtlantic
Bancorps federal income tax net operating loss
carry-forwards that expire in 2028 and $355.8 million of
state net operating loss carry forwards that expire from 2016
through 2028.
Prior to December 31, 1996, BankAtlantic was permitted to
deduct from taxable income an allowance for bad debts which was
in excess of the provision for such losses charged to income.
Accordingly, at December 31, 2008, BankAtlantic had
$21.5 million of excess allowance for bad debts for which
no provision for income tax has been provided. If, in the
future, this portion of retained earnings is distributed, or
BankAtlantic no longer qualifies as a bank for tax purposes,
federal income tax of approximately $7.5 million would be
owed.
BankAtlantic Bancorp and its subsidiaries file a consolidated
federal income tax return but separate state income tax returns.
BankAtlantic Bancorps income tax returns for all years
subsequent to the 2003 tax year are subject to examination.
Various state jurisdiction tax years remain open to examination.
BankAtlantic Bancorps 2005 and 2007 federal income tax
returns are currently under examination by the Internal Revenue
Service. No other income tax filings are under examination by
any other taxing authority.
F-129
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Woodbridge valuation allowances of $154.1 million and
$78.6 million at December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, have been established due to Woodbridges
significance losses, including losses generated by Levitt and
Sons, and significant uncertainties regarding its ability to
realize these assets. Woodbridge will be required to update its
estimates of future taxable income based upon additional
information management obtains and will continue to evaluate the
realizability of the net deferred tax asset on a quarterly
basis. As of December 31, 2008, Woodbridge had federal and
Florida NOL carryforwards of approximately $191.6 million
and $191.2 million, respectively which expire through the
year 2028. Woodbridge has established a valuation allowance for
its entire deferred tax assets, net of the deferred tax
liabilities. Of the total net operating loss carryforwards,
approximately $131.8 million were generated by Levitt and
Sons after filing for Bankruptcy protection.
In August of 2008, Woodbridge received $29.7 million from
the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in connection with the filing
of a refund claim for the carry back to 2005 and 2006 of tax
losses incurred in 2007.
Woodbridge is subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as
to income tax in multiple state jurisdictions. Woodbridge is no
longer subject to U.S. federal or state and local income
tax examinations by tax authorities for tax years before 2005.
The IRS commenced an examination of Woodbridges
U.S. income tax return for 2004 in the fourth quarter of
2006 and completed its examination in the first quarter of 2008.
The conclusion of the examination resulted in a small refund
expected to be received in the second quarter of 2008 and will
have an immaterial effect on Woodbridges results of
operations or financial condition. On January 8, 2009,
Woodbridge receive a letter from the IRS that Woodbridge and its
subsidiaries has been selected for an examination of the tax
periods ending December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 in
connection with the 2007 tax refund claim. The IRS examination
process is in the early planning stage.
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge are not included in the
Companys consolidated tax return. BankAtlantic Bancorp and
Woodbridge each file their own consolidated tax return and
accordingly BFCs deferred tax assets and liabilities,
including net operating loss (NOLs) carryforwards
are specific to BFC and may not be utilized by BankAtlantic
Bancorp and Woodbridge. At December 31, 2008, the Company
(excluding BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge) had estimated
state and federal net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards as
follows for which a valuation allowance was established at
December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expiration Year
|
|
State
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
1,662
|
|
|
|
1,831
|
|
2012
|
|
|
669
|
|
|
|
984
|
|
2021
|
|
|
806
|
|
|
|
1,422
|
|
2022
|
|
|
824
|
|
|
|
1,515
|
|
2023
|
|
|
2,008
|
|
|
|
3,792
|
|
2024
|
|
|
28,059
|
|
|
|
34,714
|
|
2025
|
|
|
4,964
|
|
|
|
5,797
|
|
2026
|
|
|
18,497
|
|
|
|
18,531
|
|
2027
|
|
|
6,835
|
|
|
|
6,843
|
|
2028
|
|
|
4,748
|
|
|
|
4,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
69,072
|
|
|
|
80,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys NOL carryforwards include approximately
$12.3 million that are attributed to the exercise of stock
options since SFAS 123R was adopted. In accordance with
SFAS 123R, excess tax benefits are recognized in the
financial statements upon actual realization of the related tax
benefit. At December 31,
F-130
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
2008, BFCs excess tax benefit of approximately
$4.7 million was not recognized and will not be recognized
until such deductions are utilized to reduce taxes payable.
BFCs shift in business strategy, coupled with more recent
economic developments caused the Company to reconsider its
previously disclosed tax planning strategy wherein the Company
had intended to sell BankAtlantic Bancorp Class A Common
Stock in order to generate sufficient taxable income to utilize
expiring NOLs. Because BFC believes that its best long term
potential is more likely to occur through the growth of the
companies it controls, BFCs current business strategy is
to hold its investment in BankAtlantic Bancorp indefinitely and
no longer intends to pursue such a tax planning strategy.
Accordingly, based on the Companys change in intent as to
the expected manner of recovery of its investment in
BankAtlantic Bancorp, the Company reversed its deferred tax
liability of $29.3 million during the quarter ended
September 30, 2008. BFC has the ability and intent to
increase its ownership in BankAtlantic Bancorp to a level
sufficient to effectuate a tax-free transaction.
The Company also concluded that a valuation allowance was
required because based on available evidence it was determined
that it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the
deferred tax asset will not be realized, and BFC is not
generating sufficient taxable income to utilize the benefit of
the deferred tax asset. Therefore, the Company established a
valuation allowance of approximately $28.3 million in 2008.
On January 1, 2007, the Company adopted Financial
Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(FIN 48). The Company (without consideration of
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge) had no significant
adjustment upon the adoption of this interpretation. The
Companys interest in cumulative adjustments associated
with the implementation of FIN 48 by BankAtlantic Bancorp
and Woodbridge increased the Companys retained earnings
opening balance and decreased liabilities in the aggregate
amount of $121,000. These cumulative-effect adjustments
represent the difference between the amount of tax benefits
required to be recognized based on the application of
FIN 48 and the amount of tax benefits recognized prior to
the application of FIN 48.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of
unrecognized tax benefits primarily associated with BankAtlantic
Bancorp and Woodbridge is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Balance as of beginning of period
|
|
$
|
2,559
|
|
|
|
2,185
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to current year
|
|
|
542
|
|
|
|
1,322
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to prior year
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
Lapse of Statute of Limitations
|
|
|
(575
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions of tax positions for prior years
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(1,036
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of end of period
|
|
$
|
2,571
|
|
|
|
2,559
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The recognition of these unrecognized tax benefits of
approximately $2.6 million and $2.6 million would
result in a 0.14% and 0.14% decrease in the Companys
consolidated effective tax rates for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Company
recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to
unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense
F-131
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
26.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
The Company is a lessee under various operating leases for real
estate and equipment extending to the year 2072. At
December 31, 2008, the approximate minimum future rentals
under such leases, from continuing operations, for the periods
shown are (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31,
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
10,503
|
|
2010
|
|
|
8,972
|
|
2011
|
|
|
7,382
|
|
2012
|
|
|
6,404
|
|
2013
|
|
|
5,947
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
69,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
108,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company incurred rent expense from continuing operations,
for the periods shown (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Rental expense for premises and equipment
|
|
$
|
14,407
|
|
|
|
16,191
|
|
|
|
13,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the normal course of its business, BankAtlantic is a party to
financial instruments with
off-balance-sheet
risk. These financial instruments include commitments to extend
credit and to issue standby and documentary letters of credit.
Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of
credit risk. BankAtlantics exposure to credit loss in the
event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial
instrument for commitments to extend credit and for standby
letters of credit written is represented by the contractual
amount of those instruments. BankAtlantic uses the same credit
policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it
does for on-balance-sheet instruments.
F-132
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Commitments and financial instruments with off-balance sheet
risk were (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
BFC Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guaranty agreements
|
|
$
|
38,000
|
|
|
|
59,112
|
|
Financial Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to sell fixed rate residential loans
|
|
|
25,304
|
|
|
|
21,029
|
|
Commitments to sell variable rate residential loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,518
|
|
Commitments to purchase variable rate residential loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,921
|
|
Commitments to purchase fixed rate residential loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,189
|
|
Commitments to originate loans held for sale
|
|
|
21,843
|
|
|
|
18,344
|
|
Commitments to originate loans held to maturity
|
|
|
16,553
|
|
|
|
158,589
|
|
Commitments to extend credit, including the undisbursed portion
of loans in process
|
|
|
597,739
|
|
|
|
992,838
|
|
Standby letters of credit
|
|
|
20,558
|
|
|
|
41,151
|
|
Commercial lines of credit
|
|
|
66,954
|
|
|
|
96,786
|
|
Real Estate Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continued Agreement of Indemnity- surety bonds
|
|
|
19,900
|
|
|
|
19,100
|
|
Royalty fee license agreement
|
|
|
923
|
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
BFC
Activities
On March 31, 2008, the membership interests of two of the
Companys indirect subsidiaries which owned two South
Florida shopping centers were sold to an unaffiliated third
party. In connection with the sale of the membership interests,
BFC was relieved of its guarantee related to the loans
collateralized by the shopping centers, and BFC believes that
any possible remaining obligations are both remote and
immaterial.
A wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC, Inc. (BFC/CCC)
has a 10% interest in a limited partnership as a non-managing
general partner. The partnership owns an office building located
in Boca Raton, Florida, and in connection with the purchase of
such office building in March 2006, BFC/CCC guaranteed repayment
of a portion of the non-recourse loan on the property on a joint
and several basis with the managing general partner.
BFC/CCCs maximum exposure under this guarantee agreement
is $8.0 million (which is shared on a joint and several
basis with the managing general partner), representing
approximately 35.4% of the current indebtedness of the property,
with the guarantee to be partially reduced in the future based
upon the performance of the property.
A wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC has a 10% interest in a
limited liability company that owns two commercial properties in
Hillsborough County, Florida. In connection with the purchase of
the commercial properties in November 2006, BFC and the
unaffiliated member each guaranteed the payment of up to a
maximum of $5.0 million each for certain environmental
indemnities and specific obligations that are not related to the
financial performance of the assets. BFC and the unaffiliated
member also entered into a cross indemnification agreement which
limits BFCs obligations under the guarantee to acts of BFC
and its affiliates. The BFC guarantee represents approximately
19.5% of the current indebtedness collateralized by the
commercial properties.
A wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC/CCC has a 50% limited partner
interest in a limited partnership that has a 10% interest in a
limited liability company that owns an office building in Tampa,
Florida. In connection with the purchase of the office building
by the limited liability company in June 2007, BFC guaranteed
the payment of certain environmental indemnities and specific
obligations that are not related to the financial
F-133
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
performance of the asset up to a maximum of $15.0 million,
or $25.0 million in the event of any petition or
involuntary proceedings under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or
similar state insolvency laws or in the event of any transfers
of interests not in accordance with the loan documents. BFC and
the unaffiliated members also entered into a cross
indemnification agreement which limits BFCs obligations
under the guarantee to acts of BFC and its affiliates.
Other than these guarantees, the remaining instruments indicated
in the table are direct commitments of BankAtlantic Bancorp or
Woodbridge.
Financial
Services
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend funds to a
customer as long as there is no violation of any condition
established in the commitment. Commitments generally have fixed
expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require
payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to
expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do
not necessarily represent future cash requirements. BankAtlantic
has $195.2 million of commitments to extend credit at a
fixed interest rate and $440.9 million of commitments to
extend credit at a variable rate. BankAtlantic evaluates each
customers creditworthiness on a
case-by-case
basis. The amount of collateral required by BankAtlantic in
connection with an extension of credit is based on
managements credit evaluation of the counter-party.
Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by
BankAtlantic to guarantee the performance of a customer to a
third party. BankAtlantic standby letters of credit are
generally issued to customers in the construction industry
guaranteeing project performance. These types of standby letters
of credit had a maximum exposure of $14.1 million at
December 31, 2008. BankAtlantic also issues standby letters
of credit to commercial lending customers guaranteeing the
payment of goods and services. These types of standby letters of
credit had a maximum exposure of $6.4 million at
December 31, 2008. Those guarantees are primarily issued to
support public and private borrowing arrangements and generally
have maturities of one year or less. The credit risk involved in
issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that
involved in extending loan facilities to customers. BankAtlantic
may hold certificates of deposit and residential and commercial
liens as collateral for such commitments which are
collateralized similar to other types of borrowings. Included in
other liabilities at December 31, 2008 was $20,000 of
unearned guarantee fees. There were no obligations recorded in
the financial statements associated with these guarantees.
BankAtlantic is required to maintain reserve balances with the
Federal Reserve Bank. Such reserves consisted of cash and
amounts due from banks of $68.1 million and
$53.0 million at December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
As a member of the FHLB system, BankAtlantic is required to
purchase and hold stock in the FHLB of Atlanta. As of
December 31, 2008 BankAtlantic was in compliance with this
requirement, with an investment of approximately
$54.6 million in stock of the FHLB of Atlanta.
Pursuant to the Ryan Beck sale agreement BankAtlantic Bancorp
agreed to indemnify Stifel and its affiliates against any claims
of any third party losses attributable to disclosed or
undisclosed liabilities that arise out of the conduct or
activities of Ryan Beck prior to the Stifel acquisition of Ryan
Beck. The indemnification of the third party losses is limited
to those losses which individually exceed $100,000, and in the
aggregate exceed $3 million with a $20 million
limitation on the indemnity. Stifel recently indicated that it
believes the threshold for such obligation have been met and
BankAtlantic Bancorp has requested information from Stifel in
order to determine if any amounts might be owed. Based on the
information provided by Stifel, management of BankAtlantic
Bancorp believes that the obligation, if any, under the Stifel
indemnity will not have a material impact on BankAtlantic
Bancorps financial statements. The indemnified losses
include federal taxes and litigation claims.
BankAtlantic has terminated various operating leases originally
executed for store expansion or back-office facilities. In
certain lease terminations the landlord consents to the
assignment of the lease to a third
F-134
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
party; however, BankAtlantic remains secondarily liable for the
lease obligation. As of December 31, 2008 BankAtlantic was
secondarily liable for $11.5 million of lease payments.
BankAtlantic uses the same credit policies in assigning these
leases to third parties as it does in originating loans.
BankAtlantic recognized a lease guarantee obligation upon the
execution of the lease assignment and included in other
liabilities at December 31, 2008 was $0.2 million of
unamortized lease guarantee obligations.
The FDIC is authorized to raise the assessment rates in certain
circumstances, which would affect savings institutions in all
risk categories. The FDIC has exercised this authority several
times in the past and could raise rates in the future. The FDIC
has proposed to adjust, and in certain instances increase,
insurance assessment rates for quarters beginning on or after
April 1, 2009 as well as impose a special assessment
payable September 30, 2009. While the special assessment is
under continued discussion, increases in deposit insurance
premiums would have an adverse effect on our earnings.
Real
Estate Development
Tradition Development Company, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Core Communities (TDC), has an existing advertising
agreement with the operator of a Major League Baseball team
pursuant to which, among other advertising rights, TDC obtained
a royalty-free license to use, among others, the trademark
Tradition Field at the sports complex located in
Port St. Lucie and the naming rights to that complex. The
initial term of the agreement terminates on December 31,
2013; provided, however, upon payment of a specified buy-out fee
and compliance with other contractual procedures, TDC has the
right to terminate the agreement at any time. Required
cumulative payments under the agreement through
December 31, 2013 are approximately $923,000.
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, Woodbridge had outstanding
surety bonds and letters of credit of approximately
$8.2 million and $7.1 million, respectively, related
primarily to its obligations to various governmental entities to
construct improvements in its various communities. Woodbridge
estimates that approximately $5.0 million of work remains
to complete these improvements and does not believe that any
outstanding bonds or letters of credit will likely be drawn upon.
In January of 2009, Core was advised by one of its lenders that
they had received an external appraisal on the land that serves
as collateral for a development mortgage note payable with an
outstanding balance of $86.9 million at December 31,
2008. The appraised value indicates the potential for a
remargining payment to bring the note payable back in line with
the minimum
loan-to-value
requirement. The lender is conducting its internal review
procedures of the appraisal, including the determination of the
appraised value. As of the date hereof, the lenders
evaluation is continuing and until such time as there is final
conclusion on the part of the lender, the amount of a possible
re-margin, if any, is not determinable.
Levitt and Sons had $33.3 million in surety bonds related
to its ongoing projects at the time of the filing of the
Chapter 11 Cases. In the event that these obligations are
drawn and paid by the surety, Woodbridge could be responsible
for up to $11.7 million plus costs and expenses in
accordance with the surety indemnity agreements. As of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, Woodbridge had
$1.1 million and $1.8 million, respectively, in surety
bonds accrual at Woodbridge related to certain bonds for which
management considers it to be probable that Woodbridge will be
required to reimburse the surety under applicable indemnity
agreements. During the year ended December 31, 2008,
Woodbridge reimbursed the surety $532,000 in accordance with the
indemnity agreement for bond claims paid during the period while
no reimbursements were made in 2007. It is unclear given the
uncertainty involved in the Chapter 11 Cases whether and to
what extent the remaining outstanding surety bonds of Levitt and
Sons will be drawn and the extent to which Woodbridge may be
responsible for additional amounts beyond this accrual. It is
unlikely that Woodbridge would have the ability to receive any
repayment, assets or other consideration as recovery of any
amounts it is required to pay. The expense associated with this
accrual is included in other expense in Woodbridge Other
Operations segment for the year ended December 31, 2007,
due to its non-recurring and unusual nature. In September 2008,
a surety filed a lawsuit to require Woodbridge to post
$5.4 million of collateral against a portion of the
$11.7 million
F-135
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
surety bonds exposure in connection with two bonds totaling
$5.4 million with respect to which a municipality made
claims against the surety. Woodbridge believes that the
municipality does not have the right to demand payment under the
bonds and initiated a lawsuit against the municipality and does
not believe that a loss is probable. Accordingly, Woodbridge did
not accrue any amount in connection with this claim as of
December 31, 2008. As claims were made on the bonds, the
surety requested Woodbridge post a $4.0 million letter of
credit as security while the matter is litigated with the
municipality, and Woodbridge has complied with that request.
Woodbridge entered into an indemnity agreement in April 2004
with a joint venture partner at Altman Longleaf relating to,
among other obligations, that partners guarantee of the
joint ventures indebtedness. The liability under the
indemnity agreement was limited to the amount of any
distributions from the joint venture which exceeded
Woodbridges original capital and other contributions.
Original capital contributions were approximately $585,000 and
Woodbridge has received approximately $1.2 million in
distributions since 2004. In December 2008, Woodbridges
interest in the joint venture was sold and it received
approximately $182,000 as a result of the sale and Woodbridge
was released from any potential obligation of indemnity which
may have arisen in connection with the joint venture.
The Company is a unitary savings bank holding company that owns
approximately 23% and 100%, respectively, of the outstanding
BankAtlantic Bancorp Class A and Class B Common Stock,
in the aggregate representing approximately 30% of all the
outstanding BankAtlantic Bancorp Common Stock. BankAtlantic
Bancorp is the holding company for BankAtlantic by virtue of its
ownership of 100% of the outstanding BankAtlantic common stock.
BFC is subject to regulatory oversight and examination by the
OTS as discussed herein with respect to BankAtlantic Bancorp.
BankAtlantic Bancorp is a unitary savings bank holding company
subject to regulatory oversight and examination by the OTS,
including normal supervision and reporting requirements. The
Company is subject to the reporting and other requirements of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act). BankAtlantic Bancorp is also subject to the
reporting and other requirements of the Exchange Act.
BankAtlantics deposits are insured by the FDIC for up to
$250,000 for each insured account holder through
December 31, 2009 and $100,000 thereafter, the maximum
amount currently permitted by law. BankAtlantic has opted to
insure its non-interest bearing and interest bearing deposits up
to 50 basis point in an unlimited amount pursuant to the
FDIC transaction account guarantee program. BankAtlantic is
subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered
by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital
requirements can cause regulators to initiate certain mandatory
and possibly additional discretionary actions that, if
undertaken, could have a direct material effect on
BankAtlantics financial statements. At December 31,
2008, BankAtlantic met all capital adequacy requirements to
which it is subject and was considered a well capitalized
institution.
The ability of BankAtlantic to pay dividends or make other
distributions to BankAtlantic Bancorp in subsequent periods is
subject to regulations and OTS approval and is based upon
BankAtlantics regulatory capital levels and net income.
Because BankAtlantic has an accumulated deficit during the prior
two years, BankAtlantic is required to file an application to
receive approval of the OTS in order to pay dividends to
BankAtlantic Bancorp. While the OTS has approved dividends to
date the OTS would likely not approve any distribution that
would cause BankAtlantic to fail to meet its capital
requirements or if the OTS believes that a capital distribution
by BankAtlantic constitutes an unsafe or unsound action or
practice. There is no assurance that the OTS will approve future
capital distributions from BankAtlantic. During the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 BankAtlantic paid
$15 million, $20 million and $20 million,
respectively, of dividends to BankAtlantic Bancorp. During the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, BFC
recognized approximately $208,000, $1.7 million and
$2.1 million, respectively, of dividends from BankAtlantic
Bancorp. There are no restrictions on the payment of cash
dividends by BFC. BFC has never paid cash dividends.
F-136
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
BankAtlantics actual capital amounts and ratios are
presented in the table (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Capital
|
|
To be Considered
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
Adequacy Purposes
|
|
Well Capitalized
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
As of December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital
|
|
$
|
456,776
|
|
|
|
11.63
|
%
|
|
$
|
314,339
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
392,923
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
Tier I risk-based capital
|
|
|
385,006
|
|
|
|
9.80
|
|
|
|
157,169
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
235,754
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
Tangible capital
|
|
|
385,006
|
|
|
|
6.80
|
|
|
|
84,929
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
84,929
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
Core capital
|
|
|
385,006
|
|
|
|
6.80
|
|
|
|
226,478
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
283,098
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
As of December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital
|
|
|
495,668
|
|
|
|
11.63
|
|
|
|
340,998
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
426,248
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
|
Tier I risk-based capital
|
|
|
420,063
|
|
|
|
9.85
|
|
|
|
170,499
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
255,749
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
Tangible capital
|
|
|
420,063
|
|
|
|
6.94
|
|
|
|
90,821
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
90,821
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
Core capital
|
|
|
420,063
|
|
|
|
6.94
|
|
|
|
242,190
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
302,738
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
|
F-137
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
28.
|
Parent
Company Financial Information
|
The accounting policies of the parent company are generally the
same as those described in the summary of significant accounting
policies in Note 1. The Companys investments in
venture partnerships, BankAtlantic Bancorp, Woodbridge and
wholly-owned subsidiaries in the parent companys financial
statements are presented under the equity method of accounting.
The Parent Company Condensed Statements of Financial Condition
at December 31, 2008 and 2007 and Condensed Statements of
Operations and Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008
is shown below:
Parent
Company Condensed Statements of Financial Condition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
9,218
|
|
|
|
17,999
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
862
|
|
Investment in Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock
|
|
|
16,426
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Investment in venture partnerships
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
864
|
|
Investment in BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc.
|
|
|
66,326
|
|
|
|
108,173
|
|
Investment in Woodbridge Holdings Corporation
|
|
|
35,575
|
|
|
|
54,637
|
|
Investment in and advances to wholly owned subsidiaries
|
|
|
2,323
|
|
|
|
1,578
|
|
Loans receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,782
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
835
|
|
|
|
906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
131,161
|
|
|
|
208,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances from and negative basis in wholly owned subsidiaries
|
|
$
|
789
|
|
|
|
3,174
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
6,476
|
|
|
|
7,722
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
7,265
|
|
|
|
24,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable 5% Cumulative Preferred Stock
|
|
|
11,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
112,867
|
|
|
|
184,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
131,161
|
|
|
|
208,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-138
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Parent
Company Condensed Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
2,489
|
|
|
|
3,977
|
|
|
|
2,232
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
11,405
|
|
|
|
9,565
|
|
|
|
8,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) before earnings (loss) from subsidiaries
|
|
|
(8,916
|
)
|
|
|
(5,588
|
)
|
|
|
(6,181
|
)
|
Equity from (loss) earnings in BankAtlantic Bancorp
|
|
|
(56,230
|
)
|
|
|
(7,206
|
)
|
|
|
5,807
|
|
Equity from loss in Woodbridge
|
|
|
(22,261
|
)
|
|
|
(39,622
|
)
|
|
|
(1,519
|
)
|
Equity from earnings (loss) in other subsidiaries
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(1,083
|
)
|
|
|
(658
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(87,392
|
)
|
|
|
(53,499
|
)
|
|
|
(2,551
|
)
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
(14,887
|
)
|
|
|
(19,599
|
)
|
|
|
(1,854
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations attributable to BFC
|
|
|
(72,505
|
)
|
|
|
(33,900
|
)
|
|
|
(697
|
)
|
Equity in subsidiaries discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
4,461
|
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
(1,524
|
)
|
Extraordinary gain, net of tax
|
|
|
9,145
|
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to BFC
|
|
|
(58,899
|
)
|
|
|
(30,459
|
)
|
|
|
(2,221
|
)
|
5% Preferred Stock dividends
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss allocable to common stock
|
|
$
|
(59,649
|
)
|
|
|
(31,209
|
)
|
|
|
(2,971
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-139
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Parent
Company Statements of Cash Flow
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
$
|
(5,508
|
)
|
|
|
(4,505
|
)
|
|
|
(3,041
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of investment in real estate limited
partnership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of securities
|
|
|
834
|
|
|
|
1,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution from partnership
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in real estate limited partnership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
Additions to property and equipment
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
Acquisition of Woodbridge Class A shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,205
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of BankAtlantic Bancorp Class A shares
|
|
|
(3,925
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(2,469
|
)
|
|
|
(30,869
|
)
|
|
|
(923
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of Class A Common Stock net of
issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of Common Stock upon exercise of stock
option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase and retirement of the Companys Class A
common stock
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of the minimum withholding tax upon the exercise of
stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,154
|
)
|
5% Preferred Stock dividends paid
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(804
|
)
|
|
|
35,558
|
|
|
|
(4,904
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(8,781
|
)
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
(8,868
|
)
|
Cash at beginning of period
|
|
|
17,999
|
|
|
|
17,815
|
|
|
|
26,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of period
|
|
$
|
9,218
|
|
|
|
17,999
|
|
|
|
17,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary disclosure of non-cash investing and financing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in shareholders equity from the
effect
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of subsidiaries capital transactions, net of income taxes
|
|
$
|
2,398
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
(Decrease) increase in accumulated other comprehensive income,
net of taxes
|
|
|
(3,894
|
)
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
926
|
|
Decrease in additional paid in capital from the
re-classification of the 5% Preferred Stock to Redeemable
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
11,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance and retirement of Common Stock accepted as
consideration for the exercise price of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,154
|
|
Cumulative effect adjustment upon adoption of FASB
Interpretation No. 48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, BFC
received dividends from BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge for
a total of approximately $208,000, $1.8 million and
$2.4 million, respectively.
F-140
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
These dividends are included in operating activities in the
Parent Company Condensed Statements of Cash Flow.
In June 2008, BFC (the parent company) increased its investment
in a wholly-owned subsidiary by converting a $3.7 million
note receivable that was due from a wholly-owned subsidiary into
equity in that subsidiary.
In December 2008, the Company recorded an
other-than-temporary
impairment charge of $3.6 million on its investment in
Benihana Convertible Preferred which is included in expenses in
the Parent Company Condensed Statements of Operations. See
Note 12 for further information.
|
|
29.
|
Noncontrolling
Interest
|
The following table summarizes the noncontrolling interests held
by others in the Companys subsidiaries at
December 31, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
BankAtlantic Bancorp
|
|
$
|
170,888
|
|
|
|
351,148
|
|
Woodbridge
|
|
|
91,389
|
|
|
|
207,138
|
|
Other subsidiaries
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
262,554
|
|
|
|
558,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the noncontrolling interests loss
(earnings) recognized by others with respect to the
Companys subsidiaries for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest Continuing Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic Bancorp
|
|
$
|
(161,416
|
)
|
|
|
(22,806
|
)
|
|
|
21,072
|
|
Woodbridge
|
|
|
(111,307
|
)
|
|
|
(195,325
|
)
|
|
|
(7,643
|
)
|
Other subsidiaries
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(272,711
|
)
|
|
|
(218,165
|
)
|
|
|
13,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest Discontinued
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic Bancorp
|
|
|
12,144
|
|
|
|
6,122
|
|
|
|
(9,011
|
)
|
Woodbridge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,144
|
|
|
|
6,122
|
|
|
|
(9,011
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
$
|
(260,567
|
)
|
|
|
(212,043
|
)
|
|
|
4,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal
Contingencies
In the ordinary course of business, the Company and its
subsidiaries are parties to lawsuits as plaintiff or defendant
involving its bank operations, lending, tax certificates
activities and real estate development activities. Although the
Company and its subsidiaries believe it has meritorious defenses
in all current legal actions, the outcome of the various legal
actions is uncertain. Management of BankAtlantic Bancorp, based
on
F-141
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
discussions with legal counsel, has recognized legal reserves of
$1.5 million and believes its results of operations or
financial condition will not be materially impacted by the
resolution of these matters. However, there is no assurance that
BankAtlantic Bancorp will not incur losses in excess of reserved
amounts or in amounts that will be material to its results of
operations or financial condition.
Bankruptcy
of Levitt and Sons
On November 9, 2007, the Debtors filed voluntary petitions
for relief under the Chapter 11 Cases in the Bankruptcy
Court. The Debtors commenced the Chapter 11 Cases in order
to preserve the value of their assets and to facilitate an
orderly wind-down of their businesses and disposition of their
assets in a manner intended to maximize the recoveries of all
constituents.
On November 27, 2007, the Office of the United States
Trustee (the U.S. Trustee), appointed an official
committee of unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 Cases
(the Creditors Committee). On January 22,
2008, the U.S. Trustee appointed a Joint Home Purchase
Deposit Creditors Committee of Creditors Holding Unsecured
Claims (the Deposit Holders Committee, and
together with the Creditors Committee, the
Committees). The Committees have a right to appear
and be heard in the Chapter 11 Cases.
On November 27, 2007, the Bankruptcy Court granted the
Debtors Motion for Authority to Incur Chapter 11
Administrative Expense Claim (the Chapter 11 Admin.
Expense Motion), thereby authorizing the Debtors to incur
a post petition administrative expense claim in favor of
Woodbridge for administrative costs relating to certain services
and benefits provided by Woodbridge in favor of the Debtors (the
Post Petition Services). While the Bankruptcy Court
approved the incurrence of the amounts as unsecured post
petition administrative expense claims, the payment of such
claims is subject to additional court approval. In addition to
the unsecured administrative expense claims, Woodbridge has
pre-petition secured and unsecured claims against the Debtors.
The Debtors have scheduled the amounts due to Woodbridge in the
Chapter 11 Cases. The unsecured pre-petition claims of
Woodbridge scheduled by the Debtors are approximately
$67.3 million and the secured pre-petition claim scheduled
by the Debtors is approximately $460,000. Since the
Chapter 11 Cases were filed, Woodbridge has also incurred
certain administrative costs related to the Post Petition
Services. These costs amounted to $1.6 million and $748,000
in the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Additionally, as disclosed in Note 26, in the
year ended December 31, 2008, Woodbridge reimbursed a
Levitt and Sons surety for $532,000 of bond claims paid by the
surety. No payments were made in the year ended
December 31, 2007. The payment by the Debtors of its
outstanding advances and the Post Petition Services expenses are
subject to the risks inherent to recovery by creditors in the
Chapter 11 Cases. Woodbridge has also filed contingent
claims with respect to any liability it may have arising out of
disputed indemnification obligations under certain surety bonds.
Woodbridge also implemented an employee severance fund in favor
of certain employees of the Debtors. Employees who received
funds as part of this program as of December 31, 2008,
which totaled approximately $3.9 million as of that date,
have assigned their unsecured claims against the Debtors to
Woodbridge. It is highly unlikely that Woodbridge will recover
these or any other amounts associated with its unsecured claims
against the Debtors. In addition, the Debtors asserted certain
further claims against Woodbridge, including an entitlement to a
portion of the $29.7 million federal tax refund which
Woodbridge received as a consequence of losses experienced at
Levitt and Sons in prior periods; however, the parties have
entered into the Settlement Agreement described below.
On June 27, 2008, Woodbridge entered into a settlement
agreement (the Settlement Agreement) with the
Debtors and the Joint Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the
Joint Committee) appointed in the Chapter 11
Cases. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, among other things,
(i) Woodbridge agreed to pay to the Debtors
bankruptcy estates the sum of $12.5 million plus accrued
interest from May 22, 2008 through the date of payment,
(ii) Woodbridge agreed to waive and release substantially
all of the claims it had against the Debtors, including its
administrative expense claims through July 2008, and
(iii) the Debtors (joined by the Joint Committee) agreed to
waive and release any claims they had against Woodbridge and its
affiliates. After
F-142
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
certain of Levitt and Sons creditors indicated that they
objected to the terms of the Settlement Agreement and stated a
desire to pursue claims against Woodbridge, Woodbridge, the
Debtors and the Joint Committee agreed in principal to an
amendment to the Settlement Agreement, pursuant to which
Woodbridge would, in lieu of the $12.5 million payment
previously agreed to, pay $8.0 million to the Debtors
bankruptcy estates and place $4.5 million in a release fund
to be disbursed to third party creditors in exchange for a third
party release and injunction. The amendment also provided for an
additional $300,000 payment by Woodbridge to a deposit holders
fund. The Settlement Agreement, as amended, was subject to a
number of conditions, including the approval of the Bankruptcy
Court.
Certain of the Debtor subsidiaries of Levitt and Sons have been
provided with post-petition financing (DIP Loans)
from a third-party lender (the DIP Lender) which had
financed such Debtors projects. Under the agreements for
the DIP Loans, the DIP Loans are to be used for (i) the
reimbursement of the DIP Lenders costs and fees,
(ii) the costs of managing and safeguarding the projects,
(iii) the costs of making the projects ready for sale,
(iv) the costs to complete the projects, (v) the
general working capital needs of the Debtors related to the
projects and (vi) such other costs and expenses related to
the DIP Loans or the projects as the DIP Lender may elect. The
Bankruptcy Courts order approving the DIP Loans also
approved the sales of homes in the projects with the net
proceeds from such sales being applied towards the DIP Loans.
The order also appointed a Chief Administrator to manage and
supervise all administrative functions of these Debtors related
to the projects in accordance with the scope of authority set
forth in the DIP Loan agreements. These projects represent 89.7%
of the total assets, 66.3% of the total liabilities and 34.1% of
the shareholders deficit of Levitt and Sons at December 31,
2008.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, the DIP Loans
financed construction and development activities and selling,
general and administrative expenses related to the projects, as
well as the costs, fees and other expenses of the DIP Lender,
including interest expense. Additionally, during the year ended
December 31, 2008, homes in the projects have been sold and
closed, resulting in the receipt by the Debtors of sales
proceeds. The Chief Administrator is maintaining the accounting
records for these transactions in accordance with the DIP Loan
agreements and, as a result, financial information is not
available to Woodbridge which could be used to record these
transactions in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles on a basis consistent with Woodbridges
accounting for similar transactions. Accordingly, these
transactions have not been reflected in the financial
information for Levitt and Sons included in Note 37 to the
consolidated financial statements. However, as described herein,
due to the deconsolidation of Levitt and Sons from
Woodbridges statements of financial condition and results
of operations as of November 9, 2007, these transactions,
and the omission of the results of these transactions, will not
have an impact on Woodbridges financial condition or
operating results.
Class Action
Lawsuit
On January 25, 2008, plaintiff Robert D. Dance filed a
purported class action complaint as a putative purchaser of
Woodbridges securities against Woodbridge and certain of
its officers and directors, asserting claims under the federal
securities law and seeking damages. This action was filed in the
United States District Court for the Southern District of
Florida and is captioned Dance v. Levitt Corp. et al.,
No. 08-CV-60111-DLG.
The securities litigation purports to be brought on behalf of
all purchasers of Woodbridges securities beginning on
January 31, 2007 and ending on August 14, 2007. The
complaint alleges that the defendants violated
Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and
Rule 10b-5
promulgated there under by issuing a series of false
and/or
misleading statements concerning Woodbridges financial
results, prospects and condition. Woodbridge intends to
vigorously defend this action.
F-143
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Surety
Bond Claim
In September 2008, a surety filed a lawsuit to require
Woodbridge to post $5.4 million of collateral in connection
with two bonds totaling $5.4 million with respect to which
a municipality made claims against the surety. Woodbridge
believes that the municipality does not have the right to demand
payment under the bonds and Woodbridge initiated a lawsuit
against the municipality and do not believe that a loss is
probable. Accordingly, Woodbridge did not accrue any amount
related to this claim as of December 31, 2008. As claims
were made on the bonds, the surety requested Woodbridge post a
$4.0 million letter of credit as security while the matter
is litigated with the municipality and Woodbridge has complied
with that request.
|
|
31.
|
Fair
Value Measurement
|
SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that
would be received on the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
at the measurement date. The Statement also defines valuation
techniques and a fair value hierarchy to prioritize the inputs
used in valuation techniques. There are three main valuation
techniques to measuring fair value of assets and liabilities:
the market approach, the income approach and the cost approach.
The input fair value hierarchy has three broad levels and gives
the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities
(Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable
inputs (Level 3).
The valuation techniques are summarized below:
The market approach uses prices and other relevant information
generated by market transactions involving identical or
comparable assets or liabilities.
The income approach uses financial models to convert future
amounts to a single present amount. These valuation techniques
include present value and option-pricing models.
The cost approach is based on the amount that currently would be
required to replace the service capacity of an asset. This
technique is often referred to as current replacement costs.
The input fair value hierarchy is summarized below:
Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in
active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the
Company has the ability to access at each reporting date. An
active market for the asset or liability is a market in which
transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient
frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an
ongoing basis. A quoted price in an active market provides the
most reliable evidence of fair value and is used to measure fair
value whenever available.
Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices
included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset
or liability, either directly or indirectly. If the asset or
liability has a specified (contractual) term, a Level 2
input must be observable for substantially the full term of the
asset or liability. Level 2 inputs include: Quoted prices
for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; Quoted
prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets
that are not active, that is, markets in which there are few
transactions for the asset or liability, the prices are not
current, or price quotations vary substantially either over time
or among market makers (for example, some brokered markets), or
in which little information is released publicly (for example, a
principal-to-principal market); Inputs other than quoted prices
that are observable for the asset or liability (for example,
interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted
intervals, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities,
credit risks, and default rates).
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset
or liability. Unobservable inputs are only used to measure fair
value to the extent that observable inputs are not available,
thereby allowing for situations in which there is little, if
any, market activity for the asset or liability at the
measurement date.
F-144
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table presents major categories of the
Companys assets measured at fair value on a recurring
basis (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2008 Using:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
|
Significant Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Description
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Securities Available for Sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
532,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
532,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
REMICS
|
|
|
166,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock
|
|
|
16,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,426
|
|
Other equity securities
|
|
|
6,798
|
|
|
|
5,210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available for sale at fair value
|
|
$
|
722,698
|
|
|
|
5,210
|
|
|
|
699,224
|
|
|
|
18,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no recurring liabilities measured at fair value in
the Companys financial statements.
The following table presents major categories of assets measured
at fair value on a recurring basis using significant
unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the year ended
December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benihana
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stifel
|
|
|
Convertible
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Beginning Balance
|
|
$
|
681
|
|
|
|
10,661
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
5,133
|
|
|
|
36,475
|
|
Total gains and losses (realized/unrealized)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings (or changes in net assets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,704
|
|
|
|
(3,574
|
)
|
|
|
(3,412
|
)
|
|
|
(3,282
|
)
|
Included in other comprehensive Income
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
Purchases, issuances, and settlements
|
|
|
(432
|
)
|
|
|
(14,365
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,797
|
)
|
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,426
|
|
|
|
1,588
|
|
|
|
18,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The $3.7 million of gains for the year ended
December 31, 2008 represents realized gains relating to the
sale of Stifel warrants. The $3.4 million equity securities
loss represents an other-than-temporary impairment associated
with a decline in value related to an equity investment in an
unrelated financial institution. The Company also recorded a
$3.6 million other-than-temporary impairment of its
investment in Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock. See
Note 12.
The valuation techniques and the inputs used in our financial
statements to measure the fair value of our recurring financial
instruments are described below.
Mortgage-Backed
Securities and REMICs
The fair values of mortgage-backed and real estate mortgage
conduit securities are estimated using independent pricing
sources and matrix pricing. Matrix pricing uses a market
approach valuation technique and Level 2 valuation inputs
as quoted market prices are not available for the specific
securities that BankAtlantic owns. The independent pricing
sources value these securities using observable market inputs
F-145
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
including: benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer
quotes, issuer spreads and other reference data in the secondary
institutional market which is the principal market for these
types of assets. To validate fair values obtained from the
pricing sources, BankAtlantic reviews fair value estimates
obtained from brokers, investment advisors and others to
determine the reasonableness of the fair values obtained from
independent pricing sources. BankAtlantic reviews any price that
it determines may not be reasonable and requires the pricing
sources to explain the differences in fair value or reevaluate
its fair value.
Bonds
and Other Equity Securities
Bonds and equity securities are generally fair valued using the
market approach and quoted market prices (Level 1) or
matrix pricing (Level 2 or Level 3) with inputs
obtained from independent pricing sources to value bonds and
equity securities, if available. Also non-binding broker quotes
are obtained to validate fair values obtained from matrix
pricing. However, for certain equity and debt securities in
which observable market inputs cannot be obtained, these
securities are valued either using the income approach and
pricing models that we developed or based on observable market
data that we have adjusted based on our judgment of the factors
a market participant would use to value the securities
(Level 3).
Benihana
Convertible Preferred Stock
The fair value was assessed using Level 3 inputs as defined
by FAS 157, whereby BFCs valuation technique was to
measure the fair value based upon the income approach by
discounting the cash flows at a market discount rate.
The following table presents major categories of assets measured
at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of December 31,
2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Identical
|
|
|
Other Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Description
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Impairments
|
|
|
Loans measured for impairment using the fair value of the
collateral
|
|
$
|
209,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209,012
|
|
|
|
103,193
|
|
Investment in Bluegreen
|
|
|
29,789
|
|
|
|
29,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,433
|
|
Woodbridges investment in unconsolidated trusts
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
2,159
|
|
Private equity investments
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
|
1,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
239,743
|
|
|
|
29,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209,954
|
|
|
|
200,933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no liabilities measured at fair value on a
non-recurring basis in the Companys financial statements.
Loans
Measured for Impairment
Impaired loans are generally valued based on the fair value of
the underlying collateral. BankAtlantic primarily uses third
party appraisals to assist in measuring impaired loans. These
appraisals generally use the market or income approach valuation
technique and use market observable data to formulate an opinion
of the fair value of the loans collateral. However, the
appraiser uses professional judgment in determining the fair
value of the collateral or properties and BankAtlantic may also
adjust these values for changes in market conditions subsequent
to the appraisal date. When current appraisals are not available
for certain loans, BankAtlantic uses judgment on market
conditions to adjust the most current appraisal. The sales
prices may
F-146
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
reflect prices of sales contracts not closed and the amount of
time required to sell out the real estate project may be derived
from current appraisals of similar projects. As a consequence,
the fair value of the collateral is considered a Level 3
valuation.
Private
Equity Investments
Private investment securities represent investments in limited
partnerships that invest in equity securities based on
proprietary investment strategies. The underlying equity
investments in these limited partnerships are generally publicly
traded equity securities and the fair values of these securities
are obtained from the general partner. As the fair values of the
underlying securities in the limited partnership were obtained
from the general partner and the inputs used are proprietary to
the limited partnership and not known to the Company, the fair
value assigned to these investments is considered Level 3.
Investment
in Bluegreen
The fair value of Woodbridges investment in Bluegreen was
assessed using Level 1 inputs by using the closing price of
Bluegreens common stock on the New York Stock Exchange.
Investment
in Unconsolidated Trusts
The fair value was assessed using Level 3 inputs as defined
by FAS 157, whereby Woodbridges valuation technique
was to measure the fair value based upon the current rates and
spreads that were used to value the underlying subordinated
trust debt securities which is primarily based upon similarly
rated corporate bonds.
Financial
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments
The following table presents information for the Companys
financial instruments at December 31, 2008 and 2007 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Fair
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Value
|
|
Amount
|
|
Value
|
|
Financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
278,937
|
|
|
|
278,937
|
|
|
|
332,155
|
|
|
|
332,154
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
21,288
|
|
|
|
21,288
|
|
|
|
2,207
|
|
|
|
2,207
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
722,698
|
|
|
|
722,698
|
|
|
|
926,307
|
|
|
|
926,307
|
|
Financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,661
|
|
|
|
10,661
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
12,008
|
|
|
|
12,475
|
|
|
|
60,173
|
|
|
|
64,666
|
|
Tax Certificates
|
|
|
213,534
|
|
|
|
244,806
|
|
|
|
188,401
|
|
|
|
188,401
|
|
Federal home loan bank stock
|
|
|
54,607
|
|
|
|
54,607
|
|
|
|
74,003
|
|
|
|
74,003
|
|
Loans receivable including loans held for sale, net
|
|
|
4,317,645
|
|
|
|
3,950,557
|
|
|
|
4,528,538
|
|
|
|
4,614,705
|
|
Financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
3,926,368
|
|
|
|
3,926,382
|
|
|
|
3,953,405
|
|
|
|
3,967,256
|
|
Short term borrowings(1)
|
|
|
279,726
|
|
|
|
279,777
|
|
|
|
159,905
|
|
|
|
159,905
|
|
Advances from FHLB
|
|
|
967,491
|
|
|
|
983,582
|
|
|
|
1,397,044
|
|
|
|
1,406,728
|
|
Subordinated debentures, mortgage and notes Payable
|
|
|
287,772
|
|
|
|
266,651
|
|
|
|
26,683
|
|
|
|
26,746
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
376,104
|
|
|
|
152,470
|
|
|
|
674,644
|
|
|
|
625,943
|
|
F-147
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Short term borrowings includes federal funds purchased and other
short term borrowings and securities sold under agreements to
repurchase. |
The following discusses the estimated fair value of the
Companys financial instruments presented in accordance
with the requirements of SFAS No. 107,
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments.
Management has made estimates of fair value that it believes to
be reasonable. However, because there is no active market for
many of these financial instruments and management has derived
the fair value of the majority of these financial instruments
using the income approach technique with Level 3
unobservable inputs, there is no assurance that the Company
would receive the estimated value upon sale or disposition of
the asset. Management estimates used in its net present value
financial models rely on assumptions and judgments regarding
issues where the outcome is unknown and actual results or values
may differ significantly from these estimates. The
Companys fair value estimates do not consider the tax
effect that would be associated with the disposition of the
assets or liabilities at their fair value estimates.
Fair values are estimated for loan portfolios with similar
financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by category, and
each loan category is further segmented into fixed and
adjustable rate interest terms and by performing and
non-performing categories.
The fair value of performing loans, except residential mortgage
and adjustable rate loans is calculated by using an income
approach with level 3 inputs. The fair value of performing
loans is estimated by discounting scheduled cash flows through
the estimated maturity using estimated market discount rates
that reflect the interest rate risk inherent in the loan. The
estimate of average maturity is based on BankAtlantics
historical experience with prepayments for each loan
classification, modified as required, by an estimate of the
effect of current economic and lending conditions. Management
assigned a credit risk premium to these loans based on risk
grades and delinquency status for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
The fair value of tax certificates was calculated using the
income approach. The fair value is based on discounted expected
cash flows using discount rates that take into account the risk
of the cash flows of tax certificates relative to alternative
investments.
The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as
non-interest bearing demand deposits, savings and NOW accounts,
and money market and checking accounts, is considered the same
as book value. The fair value of certificates of deposit is
based on an income approach with Level 3 inputs. The fair
value is calculated by the discounted value of contractual cash
flows with the discount rate estimated using current rates
offered by BankAtlantic for similar remaining maturities.
The fair value of Federal Home Loan Bank stock is its carrying
amount.
The fair value of securities sold under agreements to repurchase
and federal funds purchased is calculated using the income
approach with Level 2 inputs. Contractual cash flows are
discounted based on current interest rates. The carrying value
of these borrowings approximates fair value as maturities are
generally less than thirty days.
The fair value of FHLB advances was calculated using the income
approach. The fair value was based on discounted cash flows
using rates offered for debt with comparable terms to maturity
and issuer credit standing.
The fair value of Stifel warrants as of December 31, 2007
was based on an option pricing model.
The fair values of subordinated debentures and mortgage and
notes payable were based on discounted values of contractual
cash flows at a market discount rate adjusted for
non-performance risk for the year ended December 31, 2008.
F-148
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The fair value of BankAtlantics mortgage-backed bond for
the year ended December 31, 2008 was based on a December
2008 trade with an unrelated financial institution. The fair
value of BankAtlantics mortgage-backed bond for the year
ended December 31, 2007 was based on discounted values of
contractual cash flows at a market discount rate.
The fair value on a $57.1 million of junior subordinated
debentures was obtained from NASDAQ price quotes as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007. The fair value of the remaining
junior subordinated debentures was obtained using the income
approach by discounting estimated cash flows at a market
discount rate. For the year ended December 31, 2008, the
discount rate was adjusted for non-performance risk
(Level 3).
There were no liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis in the Companys financial statements.
The carrying amount and fair values of BankAtlantics
commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit,
financial guarantees and forward commitments are not
significant. (See Note 26 for the contractual amounts of
BankAtlantics financial instrument commitments).
Derivatives
Commitments to originate residential loans held for sale and to
sell residential loans are derivatives. The fair value of these
derivatives was not included in the Companys financial
statements as the amount was not considered significant. These
derivatives relate to a loan origination program with an
independent mortgage company where the mortgage company
purchases the originated loans from BankAtlantic 14 days
after the funding date at a price negotiated quarterly for all
loans sold during the quarter.
Included in the proceeds received from the February 2007 sale of
Ryan Beck to Stifel were warrants to acquire 722,586 shares
of Stifel common stock at $24.00 per share. During the year
ended December 31, 2008, all of the Stifel warrants were
sold for a gain of $3.7 million. BankAtlantic Bancorp
received gross proceeds of $14.4 million from the sale of
the warrants.
Based on market conditions, BankAtlantic writes call options on
recently purchased agency securities (covered
calls). Included in the Statement of Operations in
Financial Services securities activities net during
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was
covered call transaction gains of $0.4 million, $0 and
$0.2 million, respectively. BankAtlantic Bancorp had no
call options outstanding as of December 31, 2008.
Concentration
of Credit Risk
BankAtlantic purchases residential loans located throughout the
country. Included in these purchased residential loans are
interest-only loans. These loans result in possible future
increases in a borrowers loan payments when the
contractually required repayments increase due to interest rate
movement and the required amortization of the principal amount.
These payment increases could affect a borrowers ability
to repay the loan and lead to increased defaults and losses. At
December 31, 2008 and 2007, BankAtlantics residential
loan portfolio included $979 million and $1.1 billion
of interest-only loans with 25% of the principal amount of these
loans secured by collateral located in California. BankAtlantic
manages this credit risk by purchasing interest-only loans
originated to borrowers that it believes to be credit worthy,
with loan-to-value and total debt to income ratios within agency
guidelines. Thus, these purchased residential loans are not
sub-prime loans.
BankAtlantic has a high concentration of consumer home equity
and commercial loans in the State of Florida. Real estate values
and general economic conditions have significantly deteriorated
during 2008. If the market conditions in Florida do not improve
during 2009 or deteriorate further BankAtlantic may be exposed
to significant credit losses.
F-149
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
32.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions
|
BFC is the controlling shareholder of BankAtlantic Bancorp and
Woodbridge. BFC also has a direct non-controlling interest in
Benihana and, through Woodbridge, an indirect ownership interest
in Bluegreen. The majority of BFCs voting capital stock is
owned or controlled by the Companys Chairman, Chief
Executive Officer and President and by the Companys Vice
Chairman, both of whom are also executive officers and directors
of BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge and directors of
Bluegreen. The Companys Vice Chairman is also a director
of Benihana.
The following table presents BFC, BankAtlantic Bancorp,
Woodbridge and Bluegreen related party transactions incurred at
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 and for each of the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006. Amounts related to
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge were eliminated in the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008 and
|
|
|
|
|
for the Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BFC
|
|
Bancorp
|
|
Woodbridge
|
|
Bluegreen
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Shared service receivable (payable)
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
$
|
398
|
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
Shared service income (expense)
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,157
|
|
|
|
(1,593
|
)
|
|
|
(1,135
|
)
|
|
|
(429
|
)
|
Facilities cost
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
$
|
(245
|
)
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
75
|
|
Interest income (expense) from cash balance/securities sold
under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
(b
|
)
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents and (securities sold under agreements
to repurchase)
|
|
|
(b
|
)
|
|
$
|
263
|
|
|
|
(4,696
|
)
|
|
|
4,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007 and
|
|
|
|
|
for the Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BFC
|
|
Bancorp
|
|
Woodbridge
|
|
Bluegreen
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Shared service receivable (payable)
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
$
|
312
|
|
|
|
(89
|
)
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
Shared service income (expense)
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,855
|
|
|
|
(1,406
|
)
|
|
|
(1,006
|
)
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
Facilities cost
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
$
|
(272
|
)
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
Interest income (expense) from cash balance/securities sold
under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
(b
|
)
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents and (securities sold under agreements
to repurchase)
|
|
|
(b
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,217
|
|
|
|
(7,335
|
)
|
|
|
6,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-150
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006 and
|
|
|
|
|
for the Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BankAtlantic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BFC
|
|
Bancorp
|
|
Woodbridge
|
|
Bluegreen
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Shared service receivable (payable)
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
$
|
312
|
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
Shared service income (expense)
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,495
|
|
|
|
(1,053
|
)
|
|
|
(1,134
|
)
|
|
|
(308
|
)
|
Office facilities cost
|
|
|
(a
|
)
|
|
$
|
(460
|
)
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
Interest income (expense) from cash balance/securities sold
under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
(b
|
)
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
|
(479
|
)
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents and (securities sold under agreements
to repurchase)
|
|
|
(b
|
)
|
|
$
|
996
|
|
|
|
(5,547
|
)
|
|
|
4,551
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Pursuant to the terms of shared service agreements between BFC,
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge, subsidiaries of BFC provide
shared service operations in the areas of human resources, risk
management, investor relations, executive office administration
and other services to BankAtlantic Bancorp and Woodbridge.
Additionally, BFC provides certain risk management and
administrative services to Bluegreen. The costs of shared
services are allocated based upon the usage of the respective
services. Also, as part of the shared service arrangement, the
Company pays BankAtlantic Bancorp and Bluegreen for office
facilities costs relating to the Company and its shared service
operations. |
|
|
|
In May 2008, BFC and BFC Shared Service Corporation (BFC
Shared Service), a wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC, entered
into office lease agreements with BankAtlantic under which BFC
and BFC Shared Service pay BankAtlantic an annual rent of
approximately $294,000 for office space in BankAtlantics
corporate headquarters. In May 2008, BFC also entered into an
office sub-lease agreement with Woodbridge for office space in
BankAtlantics corporate headquarters pursuant to which
Woodbridge will pay BFC an annual rent of approximately $152,000. |
|
(b) |
|
BFC and Woodbridge entered into securities sold under agreements
to repurchase transactions with BankAtlantic in the aggregate of
approximately $4.7 million, $7.3 million and
$5.5 million at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. Interest was recognized in connection with the
above was approximately $80,000, $185,000 and $479,000 for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
These transactions have similar terms as BankAtlantic agreements
with unaffiliated parties. Additionally, at December 31,
2008, BankAtlantic facilitated the placement of
$49.9 million of FDIC insured certificates of deposits with
other insured depository institutions on Woodbridges
behalf through the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry
Service (CDARS) program. The CDARS program
facilitates the placement of funds into certificates of deposits
issued by other financial institutions in increments of less
than the standard FDIC insurance maximum to insure that both
principal and interest are eligible for full FDIC insurance
coverage. |
During 2006, BankAtlantic reimbursed Woodbridge $438,000 for the
out-of-pocket costs incurred by it in connection with
Woodbridges efforts to develop certain property owned by
BankAtlantic, including rezoning of property and obtaining
permits necessary to develop the property for residential and
commercial use. No fees were paid to Woodbridge by BankAtlantic
in 2008.
In March 2008, BankAtlantic entered into an agreement with
Woodbridge to provide information technology support at a cost
of $10,000 per month and a one-time
set-up
charge of $17,000. During the year ended December 31, 2008,
Woodbridge paid BankAtlantic hosting fees of approximately
$73,000.
BankAtlantic Bancorp in prior periods issued options to acquire
shares of BankAtlantic Bancorps Class A common stock
to employees of Woodbridge prior to the spin-off. Additionally,
employees of BankAtlantic Bancorp have transferred to affiliate
companies and BankAtlantic Bancorp has elected, in accordance
with the
F-151
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
terms of BankAtlantic Bancorps stock option plans, not to
cancel the stock options held by those former employees.
BankAtlantic Bancorp accounts for these options to former
employees as employee stock options because these individuals
were employees of BankAtlantic Bancorp on the grant date. During
the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, former
employees exercised 2,613 and 10,293 of options, respectively,
to acquire BankAtlantic Bancorp Class A common stock at a
weighted average exercise price of $42.80 and $16.40,
respectively. There were no options exercised by former
employees during the year ended December 31, 2008.
BankAtlantic Bancorp options outstanding to former employees
consisted of the following as of December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Common
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
Price
|
|
Options outstanding
|
|
|
53,789
|
|
|
$
|
48.46
|
|
Options non-vested
|
|
|
13,610
|
|
|
$
|
92.85
|
|
During the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006,
BankAtlantic Bancorp issued to BFC employees that perform
services for BankAtlantic Bancorp options to acquire 9,800 and
10,060 shares of BankAtlantic Bancorps Class A
common stock at an exercise price of $46.90 and $73.45,
respectively. These options vest in five years and expire ten
years from the grant date. BankAtlantic Bancorp recognizes
service provider expense on these financial instruments over the
vesting period measured based on the option fair value at each
reporting period. BankAtlantic Bancorp recorded $26,000, $13,000
and $26,000 of service provider expense for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The Company and its subsidiaries utilized certain services of
Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell, P.A.
(Ruden, McClosky). Bruno DiGiulian, a director of
BankAtlantic Bancorp, was of counsel at Ruden McClosky prior to
his retirement in 2006. Fees aggregating $75,000, $274,000 and
$526,000 were paid by BankAtlantic Bancorp to Ruden, McClosky
during the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Levitt and Sons utilized the services of Conrad &
Scherer, P.A., a law firm in which William R. Scherer, a member
of Woodbridges Board of Directors, is a member. Levitt and
Sons related party information for the year ended
December 31, 2008 was not included in Woodbridges
consolidated statements of operations due to the deconsolidation
of Levitt and Sons as of November 9, 2007. Levitt and Sons
paid fees aggregating $22,000 and $470,000 to this firm during
the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
On November 19, 2007, BFCs shareholders approved the
merger of I.R.E Realty Advisory Group, Inc. (I.R.E.
RAG), a 45.5% subsidiary of BFC, with and into BFC.
The sole assets of I.R.E. RAG were 4,764,285 shares of BFC
Class A Common Stock and 500,000 shares of BFC
Class B Common Stock. In connection with the merger, the
shareholders of I.R.E. RAG, other than BFC, received an
aggregate of approximately 2,601,300 shares of BFC
Class A Common Stock and 273,000 shares of BFC
Class B Common Stock, representing their respective pro
rata beneficial ownership interests in I.R.E. RAGs BFC
shares, and the 4,764,285 shares of BFC Class A Common
Stock and 500,000 shares of BFC Class B Common Stock
that were held by I.R.E. RAG were canceled. The shareholders of
I.R.E. RAG, other than BFC, were Levan Enterprises, Ltd. and
I.R.E. Properties, Inc., each of which is an affiliate of Alan
B. Levan, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the
Board of Directors of BFC. The transaction was consummated on
November 30, 2007.
Florida Partners Corporation owns 133,314 shares of the
Companys Class B Common Stock and
1,270,302 shares of the Companys Class A Common
Stock. Alan B. Levan may be deemed to beneficially be the
principal shareholder of Florida Partners Corporation and is the
President and sole director of Florida Partners Corporation.
F-152
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Certain of the Companys affiliates, including its
executive officers, have independently made investments with
their own funds in a limited partnership that the Company
sponsored in 2001.
|
|
33.
|
Earnings
(Loss) per Share
|
The Company has two classes of common stock outstanding. The
two-class method is not presented because the Companys
capital structure does not provide for different dividend rates
or other preferences, other than voting rights, between the two
classes. The number of options considered outstanding shares for
diluted earnings per share is based upon application of the
treasury stock method to the options outstanding as of the end
of the period.
During November 2007, I.R.E. RAG, an approximately
45.5% subsidiary of the Company, was merged with and into
the Company. I.R.E. RAG owned 4,764,285 shares of our
Class A Common Stock and 500,000 shares of our
Class B Common Stock. Prior to the merger, these shares
were considered outstanding, but because the Company owned 45.5%
of the outstanding common stock of I.R.E. RAG,
2,165,367 shares of Class A Common Stock and
227,250 shares of Class B Common Stock were eliminated
from the number of shares outstanding for purposes of computing
earnings per share. As a result, the merger neither increased
the number of shares of BFC Class A Common Stock or
Class B Common Stock outstanding nor changed the
outstanding shares for calculating earnings (loss) per share.
F-153
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following reconciles the numerators and denominators of the
basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share computation for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(345,216
|
)
|
|
|
(252,065
|
)
|
|
|
12,709
|
|
Noncontrolling interests continuing operations
|
|
|
272,711
|
|
|
|
218,165
|
|
|
|
(13,406
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss attributable to BFC
|
|
|
(72,505
|
)
|
|
|
(33,900
|
)
|
|
|
(697
|
)
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss allocable to common stock
|
|
|
(73,255
|
)
|
|
|
(34,650
|
)
|
|
|
(1,447
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations, net of taxes
|
|
|
16,605
|
|
|
|
7,160
|
|
|
|
(10,535
|
)
|
Noncontrolling interests discontinued operations
|
|
|
(12,144
|
)
|
|
|
(6,122
|
)
|
|
|
9,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations, net of taxes attributable to BFC
|
|
|
4,461
|
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
(1,524
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extraordinary gain, net of taxes
|
|
|
9,145
|
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests extraordinary gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extraordinary gain, net of taxes attributable to BFC
|
|
|
9,145
|
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss allocable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(59,649
|
)
|
|
|
(31,209
|
)
|
|
|
(2,971
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
45,097
|
|
|
|
38,778
|
|
|
|
33,249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(1.62
|
)
|
|
|
(0.90
|
)
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
Earnings (loss) per share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
Earnings per share from extraordinary gain
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per share
|
|
$
|
(1.32
|
)
|
|
|
(0.81
|
)
|
|
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-154
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss allocable to common stock
|
|
$
|
(73,255
|
)
|
|
|
(34,650
|
)
|
|
|
(1,447
|
)
|
Effect of securities issuable by subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) allocable to common stock after assumed dilution
|
|
|
(73,255
|
)
|
|
|
(34,650
|
)
|
|
|
(1,540
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations, net of taxes attributable to BFC
|
|
|
4,461
|
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
(1,524
|
)
|
Effect of securities issuable by a subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations allocable to common stock after assumed
dilution
|
|
|
4,461
|
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
(1,524
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extraordinary gain, net of taxes
|
|
|
9,145
|
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of securities issuable by a subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extraordinary gain allocable to common stock after assumed
dilution
|
|
|
9,145
|
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss allocable to common stock after assumed dilution
|
|
$
|
(59,649
|
)
|
|
|
(31,209
|
)
|
|
|
(3,064
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
45,097
|
|
|
|
38,778
|
|
|
|
33,249
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock options and unvested restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
45,097
|
|
|
|
38,778
|
|
|
|
33,249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(1.62
|
)
|
|
|
(0.90
|
)
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
Earnings (loss) per share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
Earnings per share from extraordinary gain
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per share
|
|
$
|
(1.32
|
)
|
|
|
(0.81
|
)
|
|
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to acquire 1,797,960, 1,286,499 and 769,177 shares
of common stock were anti-dilutive for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
|
|
34.
|
Redeemable
5% Cumulative Preferred Stock
|
On June 7, 2004, the Board of Directors of the Company
designated 15,000 shares of the preferred stock as 5%
Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (5% Preferred
Stock) and, on June 21, 2004, sold the shares of the
Preferred Stock to an investor group in a private offering. On
December 17, 2008, certain of the designated relative
rights, preference and limitations of the Companys 5%
Preferred Stock were amended as indicated below.
On December 17, 2008, the Company amended Article IV
of the Companys Amended and Restated Articles of
Incorporation (the Amendment) with the Florida
Department of State to amend certain of the previously
designated relative rights, preferences and limitations of the
Companys 5% Preferred Stock. The Amendment eliminates the
right of the holders of the 5% Preferred Stock to convert their
shares of 5%
F-155
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Preferred Stock into shares of the Companys Class A
Common Stock. The Amendment also requires the Company to redeem
shares of the 5% Preferred Stock with the net proceeds it
receives in the event (i) the Company sells any of its
shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (the
Benihana Preferred Stock) of Benihana, Inc.
(Benihana), (ii) the Company sells any shares
of Benihanas common stock received upon conversion of the
Benihana Preferred Stock or (iii) Benihana redeems any
shares of the Benihana Preferred Stock owned by the Company.
Additionally, in the event the Company defaults on its
obligation to make dividend payments on the 5% Preferred Stock,
the Amendment entitles the holders of the 5% Preferred Stock, in
place of the Company, to receive directly from Benihana certain
payments on the shares of Benihana Preferred Stock owned by the
Company or on the shares of Benihanas common stock
received by the Company upon conversion of the Benihana
Preferred Stock. The investment in Benihana Preferred Stock is
subject to mandatory redemption on July 2, 2014. The date
may be extended by the holders of a majority of the then
outstanding shares of Benihana Preferred Stock to a date no
later than July 2, 2024.
Effective with the Amendment in December 2008 and in accordance
with Accounting Series Release No. 268
(ASR 268), the Company determined that the 5%
Preferred Stock met the requirements to be
re-classified
outside of permanent equity at its fair value at the Amendment
date of approximately $11.0 million into the mezzanine
category as Redeemable 5% Cumulative Preferred Stock at
December 31, 2008 in the Companys Consolidated
Statements of Financial Condition. The fair value of the 5%
Preferred Stock was obtained by using an income approach by
discounting estimated cash flows at a market discount rate.
Prior to the Amendment in December 2008 for all periods
presented, the 5% Preferred Stock is presented in permanent
equity at its stated value of approximately $15.0 million.
At December 31, 2008, $11.0 million was
re-classified
as Redeemable 5% Cumulative Preferred Stock and the remaining
amount of approximately $4.0 million remains classified in
Additional Paid in Capital.
The 5% Preferred Stock has a stated value of $1,000 per share.
The shares of 5% Preferred Stock may be redeemed at the option
of the Company, from time to time, at redemption prices (the
Redemption Price) ranging from $1,030 per share
for the year 2009 to $1,000 per share for the year 2015 and
thereafter. The 5% Preferred Stock liquidation preference is
equal to its stated value of $1,000 per share plus any
accumulated and unpaid dividends or an amount equal to the
Redemption Price in a voluntary liquidation or winding up
of the Company. Holders of the 5% Preferred Stock are entitled
to receive, when and as declared by the Board of Directors,
cumulative quarterly cash dividends on each such share at a rate
per annum of 5% of the stated value from the date of issuance,
payable quarterly. Since June 2004, the Company has paid
dividends on the 5% Preferred Stock of $187,500 on a quarterly
basis. The 5% Preferred Stock has no voting rights except as
required by Florida law.
|
|
35.
|
Common
Stock, Preferred Stock and Dividends
|
Common
Stock
In July 2007, the Company sold 11,500,000 shares of its
Class A Common Stock at $3.40 per share pursuant to a
registered underwritten public offering. Net proceeds from the
sale of the 11,500,000 shares by the Company totaled
approximately $36.1 million, after deducting underwriting
discounts, commissions and offering expenses. The Company
primarily used the proceeds of this offering to purchase in
Woodbridges Rights Offering approximately
16.6 million shares of Woodbridges Class A
common stock for an aggregate purchase price of
$33.2 million, and for general corporate purposes,
including working capital.
On February 7, 2005, the Company amended its Articles of
Incorporation to increase the authorized number of shares of the
Companys Class A Common Stock, par value $.01 per
share, from 20 million shares to 70 million shares.
The amendment was approved by the written consent of the holders
of shares of the Companys Class A Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock representing a majority of the votes
entitled to be cast by all shareholders on the amendment.
F-156
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The Companys Articles of Incorporation authorize the
Company to issue both Class A Common Stock, par value $.01
per share, and a Class B Common Stock, par value $.01 per
share. On May 22, 2002, the Companys Articles of
Incorporation were amended to, among other things, grant holders
of the Companys Class A Common Stock one vote for
each share held, with all holders of Class A Common Stock
possessing in the aggregate 22% of the total voting power. Prior
to the amendment, the Class A Common Stock had no voting
rights except under limited circumstances provided by Florida
law. The amendment provided for the holders of Class B
Common Stock to have the remaining 78% of the total voting
power. When the number of shares of Class B Common Stock
outstanding decreases to 1,800,000 shares, the Class A
Common Stock aggregate voting power will increase to 40% and the
Class B Common Stock will have the remaining 60%. When the
number of shares of Class B Common Stock outstanding
decreases to 1,400,000 shares, the Class A Common
Stock aggregate voting power will increase to 53% and the
Class B Common Stock will have the remaining 47%. These
relative voting percentages will remain fixed unless the number
of shares of Class B Common Stock outstanding decreases to
500,000 shares or less, at which time the fixed voting
percentages will be eliminated. Also, each share of Class B
Common Stock is convertible at the option of the holder thereof
into one share of Class A Common Stock.
Preferred
Stock
The Companys authorized capital stock includes
10 million shares of preferred stock at a par value of $.01
per share. See Note 34 for further information.
Amended
Articles and By-Laws
On December 17, 2008, the Company amended its Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation (the Amendment)
with the Florida Department of State to amend certain of the
previously designated relative rights, preferences and
limitations of the Companys 5% Cumulative Convertible
Preferred Stock. See Note 34 for further information.
On February 11, 2008, the Board of Directors of BFC amended
the Companys By-laws, as amended (the
By-laws), to include advance notice procedures
requiring, among other things, that a shareholder wishing to
properly bring business before an annual meeting of the
Companys shareholders or nominate a candidate to serve on
the Board of Directors of the Company must deliver written
notice of such business or nomination to the Companys
Secretary (i) not less than 90 days nor more than
120 days prior to the anniversary date of the immediately
preceding annual meeting of the Companys shareholders or
(ii) in the event that the annual meeting of the
Companys shareholders is called for a date that is not
within 30 days before or after the anniversary date of the
immediately preceding annual meeting of the Companys
shareholders, not later than the close of business on the tenth
day after the earlier of notice of the date of the annual
meeting of shareholders is mailed or public disclosure of the
date of the annual meeting of shareholders is made.
On December 3, 2007, the Board of Directors of BFC amended
the Companys Bylaws to allow for the issuance of
uncertificated shares of the Companys capital stock. The
Board of Directors adopted this amendment, which became
effective on December 3, 2007, in response to new
Securities and Exchange Commission rules and NYSE Arca, Inc.
listing standards which required securities listed on the NYSE
Arca, including BFCs Class A Common Stock, to be
eligible for a direct registration system by January 2008.
Dividends
While there are no restrictions on the payment of cash dividends
by BFC, BFC has never paid cash dividends on its common stock.
F-157
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
36.
|
Selected
Quarterly Results (Unaudited)
|
The following tables summarize the quarterly results of
operations for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007
(in thousands except for per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
119,415
|
|
|
|
129,881
|
|
|
|
134,713
|
|
|
|
103,461
|
|
|
|
487,470
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
173,269
|
|
|
|
173,392
|
|
|
|
158,536
|
|
|
|
214,663
|
|
|
|
719,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,854
|
)
|
|
|
(43,511
|
)
|
|
|
(23,823
|
)
|
|
|
(111,202
|
)
|
|
|
(232,390
|
)
|
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
1,803
|
|
|
|
1,443
|
|
|
|
7,178
|
|
|
|
4,640
|
|
|
|
15,064
|
|
Impairment of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,583
|
)
|
|
|
(42,996
|
)
|
|
|
(96,579
|
)
|
Impairment of investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,548
|
)
|
|
|
(15,548
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(52,051
|
)
|
|
|
(42,068
|
)
|
|
|
(70,228
|
)
|
|
|
(165,106
|
)
|
|
|
(329,453
|
)
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
(18,953
|
)
|
|
|
(15,326
|
)
|
|
|
(12,401
|
)
|
|
|
62,443
|
|
|
|
15,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(33,098
|
)
|
|
|
(26,742
|
)
|
|
|
(57,827
|
)
|
|
|
(227,549
|
)
|
|
|
(345,216
|
)
|
Discontinued operations, less income taxes
|
|
|
1,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,021
|
|
|
|
10,565
|
|
|
|
16,605
|
|
Extraordinary gain, less income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(32,079
|
)
|
|
|
(26,742
|
)
|
|
|
(43,661
|
)
|
|
|
(216,984
|
)
|
|
|
(319,466
|
)
|
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(26,208
|
)
|
|
|
(21,826
|
)
|
|
|
(48,870
|
)
|
|
|
(163,663
|
)
|
|
|
(260,567
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to BFC
|
|
|
(5,871
|
)
|
|
|
(4,916
|
)
|
|
|
5,209
|
|
|
|
(53,321
|
)
|
|
|
(58,899
|
)
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income allocable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(6,059
|
)
|
|
|
(5,103
|
)
|
|
|
5,022
|
|
|
|
(53,509
|
)
|
|
|
(59,649
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per share from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
|
(1.25
|
)
|
|
|
(1.62
|
)
|
Basic earnings per share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
Basic earnings per share from extraordinary gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
(1.19
|
)
|
|
|
(1.32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per share from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
(0.12
|
)
|
|
|
(1.25
|
)
|
|
|
(1.62
|
)
|
Diluted earnings per share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
Diluted earnings per share from extraordinary gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
|
(0.11
|
)
|
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
(1.19
|
)
|
|
|
(1.32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
45,103
|
|
|
|
45,112
|
|
|
|
45,102
|
|
|
|
45,069
|
|
|
|
45,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
45,103
|
|
|
|
45,112
|
|
|
|
45,102
|
|
|
|
45,069
|
|
|
|
45,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the fourth quarter, a goodwill impairment of
approximately $46.6 million (net of purchase accounting)
was recognized and an $81.3 million deferred tax valuation
allowance was established. Real estate values and the general
economy continued to deteriorate resulting in a
$38.5 million provision for loan losses. Additionally,
during the fourth quarter, Woodbridge established an additional
impairment on its investment in Bluegreen and its investment in
unconsolidated trusts of approximately $40.8 million and
$2.1 million, respectively, as well as an impairment charge
on its investment in Office Depot of approximately
$12.0 million.
F-158
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Also, in December 2008, BFC recorded an
other-than-temporary
impairment charge of $3.6 million on its investment in
Benihana Convertible Preferred Stock (see Note 12).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
276,525
|
|
|
|
272,543
|
|
|
|
261,012
|
|
|
|
148,487
|
|
|
|
958,567
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
282,231
|
|
|
|
334,549
|
|
|
|
493,490
|
|
|
|
182,098
|
|
|
|
1,292,368
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,706
|
)
|
|
|
(62,006
|
)
|
|
|
(232,478
|
)
|
|
|
(33,611
|
)
|
|
|
(333,801
|
)
|
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
2,893
|
|
|
|
2,026
|
|
|
|
4,763
|
|
|
|
3,042
|
|
|
|
12,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
(2,813
|
)
|
|
|
(59,980
|
)
|
|
|
(227,715
|
)
|
|
|
(30,569
|
)
|
|
|
(321,077
|
)
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
(272
|
)
|
|
|
(17,774
|
)
|
|
|
(38,757
|
)
|
|
|
(12,209
|
)
|
|
|
(69,012
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
|
(2,541
|
)
|
|
|
(42,206
|
)
|
|
|
(188,958
|
)
|
|
|
(18,360
|
)
|
|
|
(252,065
|
)
|
Discontinued operations, less income taxes
|
|
|
7,259
|
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,160
|
|
Extraordinary gain, less income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
2,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
4,718
|
|
|
|
(42,305
|
)
|
|
|
(188,958
|
)
|
|
|
(15,957
|
)
|
|
|
(242,502
|
)
|
Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
5,291
|
|
|
|
(39,391
|
)
|
|
|
(163,711
|
)
|
|
|
(14,232
|
)
|
|
|
(212,043
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to BFC
|
|
|
(573
|
)
|
|
|
(2,914
|
)
|
|
|
(25,247
|
)
|
|
|
(1,725
|
)
|
|
|
(30,459
|
)
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
(750
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss allocable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
(761
|
)
|
|
|
(3,101
|
)
|
|
|
(25,434
|
)
|
|
|
(1,913
|
)
|
|
|
(31,209
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per share from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
(0.59
|
)
|
|
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
(0.90
|
)
|
Basic earnings per share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
Basic earnings per share from extraordinary gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
(0.59
|
)
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
(0.81
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per share from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
(0.60
|
)
|
|
|
(0.10
|
)
|
|
|
(0.90
|
)
|
Diluted earnings per share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
Diluted earnings per share from extraordinary gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
(0.60
|
)
|
|
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
|
(0.81
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
33,444
|
|
|
|
33,451
|
|
|
|
42,942
|
|
|
|
45,096
|
|
|
|
38,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
33,444
|
|
|
|
33,451
|
|
|
|
42,942
|
|
|
|
45,096
|
|
|
|
38,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were material decreases in the results of operations in
the fourth quarter of 2007 primarily related to the
deconsolidation of Levitt and Sons as of November 9, 2007.
F-159
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The fourth quarter expenses included $5.7 million in
restructuring costs and exit activities related to the decision
to slow BankAtlantics store expansion as well as higher
provisions for loan losses associated with home equity and
commercial residential real estate loans. BankAtlantic Bancorp
operations were unfavorably impacted by a $3.3 million
other-than-temporary
impairment of a private investment and a $2.7 million
unrealized loss associated with Stifel Warrants.
In the fourth quarter of 2007 Woodbridge recorded
$2.5 million in certain restructuring related expenses
consisting of independent contractor agreements, and facilities
expense. See Note 6 for further details.
|
|
37.
|
Financial
Information of Levitt and Sons
|
As described in (Note 1) above, on November 9,
2007, the Debtors filed the Chapter 11 Cases. The Debtors
commenced the Chapter 11 Cases in order to preserve the
value of their assets and to facilitate an orderly wind-down of
their businesses and disposition of their assets in a manner
intended to maximize the recoveries of all constituents. In
connection with the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases,
Woodbridge deconsolidated Levitt and Sons as of November 9,
2007. As a result of the deconsolidation, Woodbridge had a
negative basis in its investment in Levitt and Sons because
Levitt and Sons generated significant losses and intercompany
liabilities in excess of its asset balances. This negative
investment, Loss in excess of investment in
Woodbridges subsidiary, is reflected as a single
amount on Woodbridges consolidated statements of financial
condition as a $55.2 million liability as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007. This balance was comprised of a
negative investment in Levitt and Sons of $123.0 million,
and outstanding advances due to Woodbridge from Levitt and Sons
of $67.8 million. Included in the negative investment was
approximately $15.8 million associated with deferred
revenue related to intra-segment sales between Levitt and Sons
and Core Communities. During the fourth quarter of 2008,
Woodbridge identified approximately $2.3 million of
deferred revenue on intercompany sales between Core and Carolina
Oak that had been misclassified against the negative investment
in Levitt and Sons. As a result, Woodbridge recorded a
$2.3 million reclassification between inventory of real
estate and the loss in excess of investment in subsidiary in the
consolidated statements of financial condition. As a result, as
of December 31, 2008, the net negative investment was
$52.9 million. Woodbridges previously reported
consolidated statements of financial condition, consolidated
statements of operations and consolidated statements of cash
flows prior to November 9, 2007 continue to include Levitt
and Sons financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows. See (Note 30) for further information
regarding the Chapter 11 Cases and Note 38 for the
status of the Settlement Agreement.
Since Levitt and Sons results are no longer consolidated
with Woodbridges results, and Woodbridge believes it is
not probable that it will be obligated to fund further losses
related to its investment in Levitt and Sons, any material
uncertainties related to Levitt and Sons ongoing
operations are not expected to impact Woodbridges future
financial results other than in connection with
Woodbridges contractual obligations to third parties and
payment of the settlement amount.
F-160
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table summarizes the assets, liabilities and net
equity of Levitt and Sons as of the deconsolidation date at
November 9, 2007, as well as the calculation of the loss in
excess of investment in subsidiary which was recorded on
Woodbridges consolidated statement of financial condition
at December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 9,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
6,387
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
356,294
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
1,681
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
8,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets deconsolidated
|
|
|
373,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
50,709
|
|
Customer deposits
|
|
|
18,007
|
|
Notes and mortgage payable
|
|
|
344,052
|
|
Due to Woodbridge
|
|
|
67,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities deconsolidated
|
|
$
|
480,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net equity/negative investment
|
|
$
|
(107,263
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
The loss in excess of investment in subsidiary is comprised
of:
|
|
|
|
|
Net equity/negative investment
|
|
|
(107,263
|
)
|
Due to Woodbridge
|
|
|
67,831
|
|
Deferred revenue(a)
|
|
|
(15,780
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(55,212
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
During the fourth quarter of 2008, deferred revenue was adjusted
by $2.3 million due to a reclassification on intercompany
land sales between Core and Carolina Oak that had been
inadvertently recorded against the negative investment. As a
result of this reclassification the net negative investment was
reduced from $55.2 million to $52.9 million as of
December 31, 2008. |
Included in the loss in excess of investment in
Woodbridges subsidiary was approximately
$15.8 million associated with deferred revenue related to
intra-segment sales between Levitt and Sons and Core Communities.
The following condensed consolidated financial statements of
Levitt and Sons were prepared in conformity with Statement of
Position
90-7,
Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under
the Bankruptcy Code
(SOP 90-7),
which requires that the liabilities subject to compromise by the
Bankruptcy Court are reported separately from the liabilities
not subject to compromise, and that all transactions directly
associated with the bankruptcy plan be reported separately as
well. Liabilities subject to compromise include pre-petition
unsecured claims that may be settled at amounts that differ from
those recorded in Levitt and Sons condensed consolidated
statements of financial condition.
F-161
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Levitt
and Sons
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
4,712
|
|
|
|
5,365
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
885
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
166,358
|
|
|
|
208,686
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
19,657
|
|
|
|
23,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
191,612
|
|
|
|
237,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
719
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
Due to Woodbridge
|
|
|
2,870
|
|
|
|
748
|
|
Liabilities subject to compromise(A)
|
|
|
327,707
|
|
|
|
354,748
|
|
Shareholders deficit
|
|
$
|
(139,684
|
)
|
|
|
(118,049
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
191,612
|
|
|
|
237,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A)
|
Liabilities
Subject to Compromise
|
Liabilities subject to compromise in Levitt and Sons
condensed consolidated statements of financial condition as of
December 31, 2008 refer to both secured and unsecured
obligations that will be accounted for under the bankruptcy
plan, including claims incurred prior to the Petition Date. They
represent the debtors current estimate of the amount of
known or potential pre-petition claims that are subject to
restructuring in the Chapter 11 Cases. Such claims remain
subject to future adjustments.
Liabilities subject to compromise at December 31, 2008 were
as follows, in thousands:
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
54,954
|
|
Customer deposits
|
|
|
15,754
|
|
Due to Woodbridge
|
|
|
87,182
|
|
Deficiency claim associated with secured debt
|
|
|
45,458
|
|
Notes and mortgage payable
|
|
|
124,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities subject to compromise
|
|
$
|
327,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-162
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Levitt
and Sons
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Years
Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of real estate
|
|
$
|
32,505
|
|
|
|
397,561
|
|
|
|
500,719
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2,245
|
|
|
|
4,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
32,507
|
|
|
|
399,806
|
|
|
|
504,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales of real estate
|
|
|
42,864
|
|
|
|
562,763
|
|
|
|
440,059
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
4,340
|
|
|
|
70,848
|
|
|
|
77,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
47,204
|
|
|
|
633,611
|
|
|
|
517,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bankruptcy related items, net
|
|
|
(7,049
|
)
|
|
|
(3,525
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net of interest and other expense
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
(1,928
|
)
|
|
|
(560
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(21,635
|
)
|
|
|
(239,258
|
)
|
|
|
(13,688
|
)
|
(Provision) benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(303
|
)
|
|
|
4,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(21,635
|
)
|
|
|
(239,561
|
)
|
|
|
(8,939
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bankruptcy
of Levitt and Sons
On February 20, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court presiding over
Levitt and Sons Chapter 11 bankruptcy case entered an
order confirming a plan of liquidation jointly proposed by
Levitt and Sons and the Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors. That order also approved the settlement pursuant to
the Settlement Agreement, as amended. No appeal or rehearing of
the courts order was timely filed by any party, and the
settlement was consummated on March 3, 2009, at which time,
payment was made in accordance with the terms and conditions of
the Settlement Agreement as amended. The cost of the settlement
and reversal of the related $52.9 million liability will be
recognized into income in the first quarter of 2009.
Executive
Compensation Program
On September 29, 2008, Woodbridges Board of Directors
approved the terms of incentive programs for certain of its
employees including certain of Woodbridges named executive
officers, pursuant to which a portion of their compensation will
be based on the cash returns realized by Woodbridge on its
investments. The programs relate to the performance of existing
investments and new investments designated by the Board
(together, the Investments). All of
Woodbridges investments have been or will be held by
individual limited partnerships or other legal entities
established for such purpose. Participating executives and
employees will have interests in the entities which will be the
basis of their incentives under the programs. Woodbridges
named executive officers may have interests tied both to the
performance of a particular investment as well as interests
relating to the performance of the portfolio of investments as a
whole.
Woodbridge, in its capacity as investor in the investment
program, will be entitled to receive a return of
Woodbridges invested capital and a specified rate of
return on its invested capital prior to its executive officers
or employees being entitled to receive any portion of the
realized profits (the share to which they may be entitled is
referred to as the Carried Interest). For existing
investments, the amount of invested capital
F-163
BFC
Financial Corporation
Notes to
Audited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
was determined as of September 1, 2008, by
Woodbridges board of directors. Once Woodbridge receives
its priority return of its invested capital and the stated
return (which accrues from September 1, 2008), Woodbridge
will also generally be entitled to additional amounts that
provide it with (i) at least approximately 87% of the
aggregate proceeds related to Woodbridges status as an
investor in excess of Woodbridges invested capital in that
investment, plus (ii) at least 35% of all other amounts
earned from third parties with respect to that investment (i.e.,
income not related to Woodbridges status as an investor,
such as management fees charged to third parties). The remaining
proceeds will be available under the incentive programs for
distribution among those employees directly responsible for the
relevant Investments and Woodbridges executive officers.
The compensation committee of Woodbridges board of
directors will determine the allocations to its named executive
officers. These allocations are identified in advance for each
of the executive officers. Although the compensation committee
can alter these allocations on a prospective basis, the total
amount payable to employees and officers cannot be changed.
Management of Woodbridge will determine the amounts to be
allocated among the other employee participants. The incentive
programs relating to both individual investments and the program
established for the executive officers with respect to the
overall performance of the portfolio of investments contain
clawback obligations that are intended to reduce the risk that
the participants will be distributed amounts under the programs
prior to Woodbridges receipt of at least a return of its
invested capital and the stated return. The programs contemplate
that the clawback obligations will be funded solely from
holdback accounts established with respect to each participant.
Amounts equal to a portion of Carried Interest distribution to
such participant (initially 25% and which can be increased, when
appropriate, to as high as 75%) will be deposited into holdback
accounts or otherwise made available for the benefit of
Woodbridge. There are also general vesting and forfeiture
provisions applicable to each participants right to
receive any Carried Interest, the terms of which may vary by
individual. Woodbridges board of directors believes that
the above-described incentive plans Plan appropriately aligns
payments to participants with the performance of its Investments.
The Executive Incentive Plan which set forth the
terms of the Carried Interests of certain executive officers in
the performance of the overall investments of Woodbridge and the
Investment Programs entered into to date which set
forth the Carried Interests of employees and certain executive
officers in the performance of particular individual investments
were executed on March 13, 2009.
|
|
39.
|
Revised
Financial Information
|
On January 1, 2009, the Company implemented
SFAS No. 160 which established new accounting and
reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a
subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary.
Accordingly, the Companys consolidated financial
statements for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and
2006 have applied retrospectively the presentation and
disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 160 from the financial
statements included in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 to reflect the
Companys implementation of SFAS No. 160. In
accordance with SFAS No. 160, the Companys
consolidated statements of financial condition presented herein
include Noncontrolling interest as a separate item
in the equity section, and the Companys consolidated
statements of operations, consolidated statements of
comprehensive income (loss) and consolidated statements of
shareholders equity presented herein separately present
the amount attributable to noncontrolling interests and the
amount attributable to the Company. In addition, segment
information has been recast to be consistent with the financial
presentation. The Companys implementation of
SFAS No. 160 had no impact on the Companys total
assets or liabilities, nor did it impact the Companys
revenues, earnings (losses) or cash position.
F-164
WOODBRIDGES
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The following financial statements and related notes have
been excerpted from Woodbridges Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the SEC on
March 19, 2009, and Woodbridges Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, filed with the SEC on
August 10, 2009. Unless the context otherwise requires,
references to we, us, our,
the Company and Woodbridge within this
section refer to Woodbridge Holdings Corporation and its
consolidated subsidiaries.
Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Unaudited Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-166
|
|
|
|
|
F-167
|
|
|
|
|
F-168
|
|
|
|
|
F-169
|
|
|
|
|
F-170
|
|
|
|
|
F-171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audited Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-198
|
|
|
|
|
F-200
|
|
|
|
|
F-201
|
|
|
|
|
F-202
|
|
|
|
|
F-203
|
|
|
|
|
F-204
|
|
|
|
|
F-205
|
|
|
|
|
F-253
|
|
Bluegreen
Corporation:
The financial statements of Bluegreen Corporation, which is
considered a significant subsidiary, for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, including the Report of
Bluegreen Corporations Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm, Ernst & Young LLP, and for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are included as
exhibits to the registration statement of which this joint proxy
statement/prospectus forms a part.
F-165
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
58,158
|
|
|
|
114,798
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
7,845
|
|
|
|
21,288
|
|
Inventory of real estate
|
|
|
243,564
|
|
|
|
241,318
|
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
|
28,580
|
|
|
|
29,789
|
|
Other equity securities
|
|
|
6,545
|
|
|
|
4,278
|
|
Certificates of deposits, short-term
|
|
|
49,920
|
|
|
|
9,600
|
|
Unconsolidated trusts
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
105,979
|
|
|
|
109,477
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
5,073
|
|
|
|
4,324
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
24,183
|
|
|
|
23,963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
530,265
|
|
|
|
559,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other
|
|
$
|
35,736
|
|
|
|
36,885
|
|
Notes and mortgage notes payable
|
|
|
263,464
|
|
|
|
264,900
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
85,052
|
|
|
|
85,052
|
|
Loss in excess of investment in subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
384,252
|
|
|
|
439,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized: 5,000,000 shares Issued and outstanding: no
shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock, $0.01 par value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized: 30,000,000 shares Issued: 16,637,132 and
19,042,149 shares, respectively
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
Class B common stock, $0.01 par value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized: 2,000,000 shares Issued and outstanding:
243,807 shares
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
339,650
|
|
|
|
339,780
|
|
Accumulated deficit(a)
|
|
|
(201,356
|
)
|
|
|
(218,868
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(a)
|
|
|
3,882
|
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,344
|
|
|
|
120,969
|
|
Less common stock in treasury, at cost
(2,385,624 shares at December 31, 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,439
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Woodbridge shareholders equity
|
|
|
142,344
|
|
|
|
119,530
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
3,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
146,013
|
|
|
|
119,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
530,265
|
|
|
|
559,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Accumulated deficit at January 1, 2009 was decreased by
$2.1 million representing the pro rata share of the after
tax non-credit portion of other-than- temporary impairment
losses recognized by Bluegreen Corporation upon its adoption of
FSP
FAS 115-2.
These
other-than-temporary
losses which were previously recognized in earnings have been
reclassified to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). |
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
F-166
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As Adjusted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(As Adjusted)
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of real estate
|
|
$
|
1,767
|
|
|
|
2,395
|
|
|
|
3,194
|
|
|
|
2,549
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
3,046
|
|
|
|
2,744
|
|
|
|
5,936
|
|
|
|
5,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
4,813
|
|
|
|
5,139
|
|
|
|
9,130
|
|
|
|
8,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales of real estate
|
|
|
1,301
|
|
|
|
1,758
|
|
|
|
1,994
|
|
|
|
1,786
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
10,349
|
|
|
|
12,952
|
|
|
|
21,103
|
|
|
|
25,579
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
3,747
|
|
|
|
2,532
|
|
|
|
6,520
|
|
|
|
5,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
15,397
|
|
|
|
17,242
|
|
|
|
29,617
|
|
|
|
32,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
|
10,714
|
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
17,050
|
|
|
|
1,737
|
|
Impairment of investment in Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,401
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of other investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,396
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
1,950
|
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
|
3,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
(8,942
|
)
|
|
|
14,978
|
|
|
|
(19,373
|
)
|
(Provision) benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
407
|
|
|
|
(8,942
|
)
|
|
|
14,978
|
|
|
|
(19,373
|
)
|
Add: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Woodbridge
|
|
$
|
677
|
|
|
|
(8,942
|
)
|
|
|
15,452
|
|
|
|
(19,373
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) per common share attributable to Woodbridge
common shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
(0.46
|
)
|
|
|
0.91
|
|
|
|
(1.01
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
(0.46
|
)
|
|
|
0.91
|
|
|
|
(1.01
|
)
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
16,893
|
|
|
|
19,255
|
|
|
|
16,890
|
|
|
|
19,255
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
16,893
|
|
|
|
19,255
|
|
|
|
16,890
|
|
|
|
19,255
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
F-167
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
407
|
|
|
|
(8,942
|
)
|
|
|
14,978
|
|
|
|
(19,373
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-rata share of unrealized gain (loss) recognized by Bluegreen
Corporation on retained interests in notes receivable sold
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
(458
|
)
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
(885
|
)
|
Pro-rata share of cumulative impact of accounting changes
recognized by Bluegreen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporation on retained interests in notes receivable sold
(FAS 115-2)
|
|
|
(1,251
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,251
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on other equity securities, net of
reclassification adjustments (See Note 8)
|
|
|
4,663
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
4,663
|
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unrealized gain (loss)
|
|
|
3,544
|
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
4,017
|
|
|
|
(1,438
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
3,951
|
|
|
|
(9,127
|
)
|
|
|
18,995
|
|
|
|
(20,811
|
)
|
Add: Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Woodbridge
|
|
$
|
4,221
|
|
|
|
(9,127
|
)
|
|
|
19,469
|
|
|
|
(20,811
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains on
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
$
|
4,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative impact of accounting changes recognized by Bluegreen
Corporation on retained interests in notes receivable sold
(FAS 115-2)
|
|
|
(1,251
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gain (loss) recognized by Bluegreen
Corporation on retained interests in notes receivable sold
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
3,882
|
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
F-168
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Six
months ended June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of Common
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Stock in
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Outstanding
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Controlling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
(Loss) Income
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
19,042
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
339,780
|
|
|
$
|
(218,868
|
)
|
|
$
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
2,386
|
|
|
$
|
(1,439
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
119,530
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,143
|
|
|
|
4,143
|
|
Purchase of treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Retirement of treasury shares
|
|
|
(2,399
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,428
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,405
|
)
|
|
|
1,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share based compensation related to stock options and restricted
stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(474
|
)
|
|
|
14,978
|
|
Pro-rata share of unrealized gain recognized by Bluegreen on
retained interests in notes receivable sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
605
|
|
Pro-rata share of the cumulative impact of accounting changes
recognized by Bluegreen Corporation on retained interests in
notes receivable sold
(FAS 115-2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,060
|
|
|
|
(1,251
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
809
|
|
Unrealized gain on other equity securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,663
|
|
Issuance of Bluegreen common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009
|
|
|
16,643
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
$
|
166
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
339,650
|
|
|
$
|
(201,356
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,669
|
|
|
$
|
146,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
F-169
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
$
|
(18,358
|
)
|
|
|
(39,768
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of other equity securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,978
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of other equity securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,904
|
|
Decrease in restricted cash
|
|
|
13,443
|
|
|
|
1,478
|
|
Cash paid in settlement of subsidiary bankruptcy
|
|
|
(12,430
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions from unconsolidated trusts
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
Adjustment to acquisition of Pizza Fusion
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the maturities of certificates of deposits,
short-term
|
|
|
9,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of certificates of deposits, short-term
|
|
|
(49,920
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(352
|
)
|
|
|
(1,123
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(36,549
|
)
|
|
|
(14,609
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from notes and mortgage notes payable
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
7,283
|
|
Repayment of notes and mortgage notes payable
|
|
|
(1,558
|
)
|
|
|
(22,656
|
)
|
Payments for debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(294
|
)
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
Purchase of treasury shares
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(1,733
|
)
|
|
|
(15,497
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(56,640
|
)
|
|
|
(69,874
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period
|
|
|
114,798
|
|
|
|
195,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period
|
|
$
|
58,158
|
|
|
|
125,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid on borrowings, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
$
|
5,299
|
|
|
|
5,793
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash operating, investing and
financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in equity resulting from unrealized gain (loss)
recognized from equity securities, net of tax
|
|
$
|
5,268
|
|
|
|
(1,438
|
)
|
Change in equity resulting from the issuance of Bluegreen common
stock, net of tax
|
|
$
|
728
|
|
|
|
497
|
|
Change in equity resulting from retirement of treasury shares
|
|
$
|
1,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in equity resulting from the cumulative impact of
accounting changes recognized by Bluegreen Corporation on
retained interests sold
(FAS 115-2)
|
|
$
|
809
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
F-170
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
|
|
1.
|
Presentation
of Interim Financial Statements
|
Woodbridge Holdings Corporation (Woodbridge or the
Company) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries engage in
business activities through its Land Division and Other
Operations segment. Historically, the Companys operations
were primarily within the real estate industry; however, the
Companys recent business strategy has included the pursuit
of investments and acquisitions within or outside of the real
estate industry, as well as the continued development of
master-planned communities. Under this business model, the
Company likely will not generate a consistent earnings stream
and the composition of the Companys revenues may vary
widely due to factors inherent in a particular investment,
including the maturity and cyclical nature of, and market
conditions relating to, the business invested in. Net investment
gains and other income will be based primarily on the success of
the Companys investments as well as overall market
conditions.
On July 2, 2009, the Company entered into a definitive
merger agreement with its parent, BFC Financial Corporation
(BFC). Subject to the terms and conditions of the
agreement, the Company will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of
BFC and the Companys shareholders (other than BFC) will
become shareholders of BFC. See Note 23 for further
information regarding the merger agreement and the proposed
merger.
The Land Division currently consists of the operations of Core
Communities, LLC (Core Communities or
Core), which develops master-planned communities.
The Other Operations segment currently includes the parent
company operations of Woodbridge (the Parent
Company), the consolidated operations of Pizza Fusion
Holdings, Inc. (Pizza Fusion), the consolidated
operations of Carolina Oak Homes, LLC (Carolina
Oak), which engaged in homebuilding activities in South
Carolina prior to the suspension of those activities in the
fourth quarter of 2008, and the activities of Cypress Creek
Capital Holdings, LLC (Cypress Creek Capital) and
Snapper Creek Equity Management, LLC (Snapper
Creek). An equity investment in Bluegreen Corporation
(Bluegreen) and an investment in Office Depot, Inc.
(Office Depot) are also included in the Other
Operations segment.
Prior to November 9, 2007, the Company also conducted
homebuilding operations through Levitt and Sons, LLC
(Levitt and Sons), which comprised the
Companys Homebuilding Division. The Homebuilding Division
consisted of two reportable operating segments, the Primary
Homebuilding segment and the Tennessee Homebuilding segment. As
previously reported, on November 9, 2007, Levitt and Sons
and substantially all of its subsidiaries (the
Debtors) filed voluntary petitions for relief under
Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code (the
Chapter 11 Cases) in the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida (the
Bankruptcy Court). In connection with the filing of
the Chapter 11 Cases, Woodbridge deconsolidated Levitt and
Sons as of November 9, 2007, eliminating all future
operations of Levitt and Sons from Woodbridges financial
results of operations. As a result of the deconsolidation of
Levitt and Sons, in accordance with Accounting Research Bulletin
(ARB) No. 51, Consolidated Financial
Statements (ARB No. 51), the Company
recorded its interest in Levitt and Sons under the cost method
of accounting.
As previously reported, on February 20, 2009, the
Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming a plan of
liquidation jointly proposed by Levitt and Sons and the Official
Committee of Unsecured Creditors. That order also approved the
settlement pursuant to the settlement agreement that was entered
into on June 27, 2008. No appeal or rehearing of the
Bankruptcy Courts order was timely filed by any party, and
the settlement was consummated on March 3, 2009, at which
time payment was made in accordance with the terms and
conditions of the settlement agreement. Under cost method
accounting, the cost of settlement and the related
$52.9 million liability (less $500,000 which was determined
as the settlement holdback and remained as an accrual pursuant
to the settlement agreement) was recognized into income in the
first quarter of 2009, resulting in a $40.4 million gain on
settlement of investment in subsidiary. See Note 22 for
further information regarding the bankruptcy of Levitt and Sons.
F-171
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries. All significant inter-segment transactions have
been eliminated in consolidation. The financial statements have
been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America for interim financial
information and in accordance with the instructions to
Form 10-Q
and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America for complete financial
statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments
(consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary
for a fair statement have been included. Operating results for
the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for
the year ending December 31, 2009. The year end balance
sheet data for 2008 was derived from the December 31, 2008
audited consolidated financial statements but does not include
all disclosures required by accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America. These financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys
audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto
included below. Certain reclassifications have been made to
prior periods consolidated financial statements to be
consistent with the current periods presentation.
Recently
Adopted Accounting Standards
In May 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 165, Subsequent
Events (SFAS No. 165).
SFAS No. 165 establishes accounting and reporting
standards for events that occur after the balance sheet date but
before financial statements are issued or are available to be
issued. In addition, SFAS No. 165 requires the
disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated
subsequent events and the basis for selecting that date, that
is, whether that date represents the date the financial
statements were issued or were available to be issued.
SFAS No. 165 was effective for fiscal years and
interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of
SFAS No. 165 did not have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated financial statements. The Company
has performed an evaluation of subsequent events through
August 10, 2009, which is the day the financial statements
were issued.
In April 2009, the FASB issued three related FASB Staff
Positions (FSPs): (i) FSP
FAS 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of
Activity for the Asset or Liability have Significantly Decreased
and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly
(FSP
FAS 157-4),
(ii) FSP
FAS 115-2
and FSP
FAS 124-2,
Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments (FSP
FAS 115-2/FAS 124-2),
and (iii) FSP
FAS No. 107-1
and APB
28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments (FSP
FAS 107-1/APB
28-1),
each of which is effective for interim and annual periods ending
after June 15, 2009. FSP
FAS 157-4
provides guidance on how to determine the fair value of assets
and liabilities under SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements
(SFAS No. 157) in the current economic
environment and reemphasizes that the objective of a fair value
measurement remains an exit price. If the Company was to
conclude that there has been a significant decrease in the
volume and level of activity of the asset or liability in
relation to normal market activities, quoted market values may
not be representative of fair value and the Company may conclude
that a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple
valuation techniques may be appropriate. FSP
FAS 115-2/FAS 124-2
modifies the requirements for recognizing
other-than-temporarily
impaired debt securities and revises the existing impairment
model for such securities, by modifying the current intent and
ability indicator in determining whether a debt security is
other-than-temporarily
impaired. FSP
FAS 107-1/APB
28-1
enhances the disclosure of instruments under the scope of
SFAS No. 157 for both interim and annual periods. The
adoption of these FSPs did not have a material impact on the
Companys unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
On December 4, 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141
(Revised 2007), Business Combinations
(SFAS No. 141(R)).
SFAS No. 141(R) significantly changed the accounting
for business combinations. Under SFAS No. 141(R),
subject to limited exceptions, an acquiring entity will be
required to recognize all
F-172
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at
the acquisition-date fair value. Additionally, due diligence and
transaction costs incurred to effect a business combination will
be expensed as incurred, as opposed to being capitalized as part
of the acquisition purchase price. SFAS No. 141(R)
also includes a substantial number of new disclosure
requirements. The adoption of SFAS No. 141(R) on
January 1, 2009 did not impact the Companys results
of operations or financial position, but will impact the
accounting for any future acquisitions.
On December 4, 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 160, Non-controlling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements-an Amendment of ARB
No. 51 (SFAS No. 160).
SFAS No. 160 establishes new accounting and reporting
standards for a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for
the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. Specifically, this
statement requires the recognition of a non-controlling interest
(previously referred to as minority interest) as equity in the
consolidated financial statements separate from the
parents equity. The amount of net income attributable to
the non-controlling interest will be included in consolidated
net income on the face of the income statement.
SFAS No. 160 clarifies that changes in a parents
ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in
deconsolidation are equity transactions if the parent retains
its controlling financial interest. In addition, this statement
requires that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income
when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. Such gain or loss will be
measured using the fair value of the non-controlling equity
investment on the deconsolidation date. SFAS No. 160
also includes expanded disclosure requirements regarding the
interests of the parent and its non-controlling interest.
SFAS No. 160 became effective for the Company on
January 1, 2009.
Revisions
and Reclassifications
In 2007, Core Communities began soliciting bids from several
potential buyers to purchase assets associated with two of
Cores commercial leasing projects (the
Projects). As the criteria for assets held for sale
had been met in accordance with SFAS No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets (SFAS No. 144), the
assets were reclassified to assets held for sale and the
liabilities related to those assets were reclassified to
liabilities related to assets held for sale. The results of
operations for these assets were reclassified as discontinued
operations. During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company
determined that given the difficulty in predicting the timing or
probability of a sale of the assets associated with the Projects
as a result of, among other things, the economic downturn and
disruptions in the credit markets, the requirements of
SFAS No. 144 necessary to classify these assets as
held for sale and to be included in discontinued operations were
no longer met and the Company could not assert the Projects
could be sold within a year. Therefore, the results of
operations for these Projects were reclassified back into
continuing operations for prior periods to conform to the
current periods presentation.
A revision was recorded by the Company in the first quarter of
2009 to account for assets and non-controlling interests not
recorded properly in the initial application of purchase
accounting of the Companys investment in Pizza Fusion. The
adjustment resulted in an increase in cash of $3.0 million,
goodwill of $1.1 million and non-controlling interest of
$4.1 million. The Company has also recorded an increase in
cash flows from investing activities in the six months ended
June 30, 2009 of $3.0 million which is included in
adjustment to acquisition of Pizza Fusion in the accompanying
unaudited consolidated statements of cash flows for the six
months ended June 30, 2009. The Company does not believe
that this revision had a material impact on the Companys
consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2008 or
December 31, 2008, nor did it materially impact the
Companys consolidated statements of cash flows for the
periods then ended. The revision also had no impact on net
income or loss or on cash flows from operating activities for
the three month periods ended September 30, 2008 or
December 31, 2008.
F-173
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
2.
|
Liquidity
Core Communities
|
Cores operations have been negatively impacted by the
downturn in the residential and commercial real-estate
industries. Market conditions have adversely affected
Cores commercial leasing projects and its ability to
complete sales of its real estate inventory and, as a
consequence, Core is experiencing cash flow deficits. Possible
liquidity sources available to Core include the sale of real
estate inventory, including commercial properties, as well as
debt and outside equity financing, including secured borrowings
using unencumbered land; however, there is no assurance that any
or all of these alternatives will be available to Core on
attractive terms, if at all, or that Core will otherwise be in a
position to utilize such alternatives to improve its cash
position. In addition, while funding from Woodbridge is a
possible source of liquidity, Woodbridge is generally under no
contractual obligation to provide funding to Core and there is
no assurance that it will do so.
Certain of Cores debt facilities contain financial
covenants generally requiring certain net worth, liquidity and
loan to value ratios. In January of 2009, Core was advised by
one of its lenders that the lender had received an external
appraisal on the land that serves as collateral for a
development mortgage note payable, which had an outstanding
balance of $86.4 million at June 30, 2009. The
appraised value would suggest the potential for a re-margining
payment to bring the note payable back in line with the minimum
loan-to-value
requirement. The lender is conducting its internal review
procedures, including the determination of the appraised value.
As of the date of this filing, Core is in discussions with the
lender to restructure the loan which may eliminate any
re-margining requirements; however, there is no assurance that
these discussions will be successful or that re-margining
payments will not otherwise be required in the future.
As discussed above, the operations of Core have been negatively
impacted by the deterioration of the real estate market, and
Core may be required to make re-margining payments under certain
of its debt facilities. These factors have caused substantial
doubt to be raised regarding Cores ability to continue as
a going concern if Woodbridge chooses not to provide Core with
the cash needed to meet its obligations when and if they arise.
Cores results are reported separately for segment purposes
as the Land Division segment in Note 17. The financial
information provided in the Land Division segment and in the
unaudited consolidated financial statements has been prepared
assuming that Core will meet its obligations and continue as a
going concern. As a result, the unaudited consolidated financial
statements and the financial information provided for the Land
Division do not include any adjustments that might result from
the outcome of this uncertainty.
On September 18, 2008, the Company, indirectly through its
wholly-owned subsidiary, PF Program Partnership, LP (formerly
Woodbridge Equity Fund II LP), purchased for an aggregate
of $3.0 million, 2,608,696 shares of Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock of Pizza Fusion, together with
warrants to purchase up to 1,500,000 additional shares of
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of Pizza Fusion at an
exercise price of $1.44 per share. The Company also received
options, exercisable on or prior to September 18, 2009, to
purchase up to 521,740 additional shares of Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock of Pizza Fusion at a price of $1.15
per share, which options, if exercised, entitled the Company to
receive warrants to purchase up to 300,000 additional shares of
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of Pizza Fusion at an
exercise price of $1.44 per share. The warrants have a term of
10 years, subject to earlier expiration in certain
circumstances. As discussed below and in Note 23, the
Company exercised these options on July 2, 2009.
Pizza Fusion is a restaurant franchise which was founded in 2006
and which operates in a niche market within the quick service
and organic food industries. As of June 30, 2009, Pizza
Fusion was operating 20 locations throughout the United
States and had entered into franchise agreements to open an
additional 9 stores by February 2010.
During 2008, the Company evaluated its investment in Pizza
Fusion under FASB Interpretation No. 46(R),
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
(FIN No. 46(R)), and determined that Pizza
Fusion is a
F-174
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
variable interest entity. Pizza Fusion is in its infancy stages
and will likely require additional financial support for its
normal operations and further expansion of its franchise
operations. Furthermore, on a fully diluted basis, the
Companys investment represents a significant interest in
Pizza Fusion and, therefore, the Company is expected to bear the
majority of the variability of the risks and rewards of Pizza
Fusion. Additionally, as shareholder of the Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock, the Company has control over the
Board of Directors of Pizza Fusion. Based upon these
factors, the Company concluded that it is the primary
beneficiary. Accordingly, under purchase accounting, the Company
has consolidated the assets and liabilities of Pizza Fusion in
accordance with SFAS No. 141 Business
Combinations. However, the assets of Pizza Fusion are
not available to Woodbridge.
The Company recorded $5.5 million in other intangible
assets, including $1.1 million in goodwill related to its
investment in Pizza Fusion. The intangible assets consist
primarily of the value of franchise agreements that had been
executed by Pizza Fusion at the acquisition date. These
intangible assets will be amortized over the length of the
franchise agreements, which is generally 10 years.
On July 2, 2009, the Company exercised its option to
purchase 521,740 shares of Series B Preferred Stock of
Pizza Fusion at a price of $1.15 per share, or an aggregate
purchase price of $600,000. Upon the exercise of the option, the
Company was also granted warrants to purchase up to 300,000
additional shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
of Pizza Fusion at an exercise price of $1.44 per share. The
warrants have a term of 10 years, subject to earlier
expiration under certain circumstances.
|
|
4.
|
Stock
Based Compensation
|
The Company recognizes stock based compensation expense under
the provisions of SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment
(SFAS No. 123R), using the modified
prospective transition method. SFAS No. 123R requires
a public entity to measure compensation cost associated with
awards of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value
of the awards over the requisite service period.
SFAS No. 123R requires public entities to initially
measure compensation cost associated with awards of liability
instruments based on their current fair value. The fair value of
that award is to be remeasured subsequently at each reporting
date through the settlement date. Changes in fair value during
the requisite service period will be recognized as compensation
cost over that period.
In accordance with SFAS No. 123R, the Company
estimates the grant-date fair value of its stock options using
the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which takes into account
assumptions regarding the dividend yield, the risk-free interest
rate, the expected stock-price volatility and the expected term
of the stock options. The fair value of the Companys stock
option awards, which are primarily subject to five year cliff
vesting, is expensed over the vesting life of the stock options
using the straight-line method.
The following table summarizes stock options outstanding as of
June 30, 2009 as well as activity during the six months
then ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Average Exercise
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
318,471
|
|
|
$
|
78.89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
3,900
|
|
|
$
|
72.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at June 30, 2009
|
|
|
314,571
|
|
|
$
|
78.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at June 30, 2009
|
|
|
141,682
|
|
|
$
|
70.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-175
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of June 30, 2009, the weighted average remaining
contractual lives of stock options outstanding and stock options
exercisable were 6.7 years and 6.1 years, respectively.
Non-cash stock compensation expense related to stock options for
the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 amounted to
$262,000 and $568,000, respectively. Non-cash stock compensation
expense related to stock options for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 amounted to $527,000 and
$1.2 million, respectively.
The Company also grants shares of restricted Class A Common
Stock, valued at the closing market price of such stock on the
date of grant. Restricted stock is issued primarily to the
Companys directors and typically vests in equal monthly
installments over a one-year period. Compensation expense
arising from restricted stock grants is recognized using the
straight-line method over the vesting period. Unearned
compensation for restricted stock is a component of additional
paid-in capital in shareholders equity in the unaudited
consolidated statements of financial condition. Non-cash stock
compensation expense related to restricted stock for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 amounted to $35,000 and
$29,000, respectively. Non-cash stock compensation expense
related to restricted stock for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 amounted to approximately $88,000
and $46,000, respectively.
Historically, forfeiture rates were estimated based on
historical employee turnover rates. In accordance with
SFAS No. 123R, companies are required to adjust
forfeiture estimates for all awards with performance and service
conditions through the vesting date so that compensation cost is
recognized only for awards that vest. During the six months
ended June 30, 2009, there was a small amount of
pre-vesting forfeitures as a result of reductions in force in
the Land Division. During the six months ended June 30,
2008, there were substantial pre-vesting forfeitures as a result
of reductions in force related to the Companys
restructurings and the bankruptcy of Levitt and Sons. In
accordance with SFAS No. 123R, pre-vesting forfeitures
result in a reversal of compensation cost whereas a post-vesting
cancellation would not. The Company did not recognize a
significant reversal of compensation cost for the six months
ended June 30, 2009, while the Company recognized
approximately $1.2 million in reversal of compensation
expense related to pre-vesting option forfeitures for the six
months ended June 30, 2008.
On September 29, 2008, the Companys Board of
Directors approved the terms of an incentive program for certain
of the Companys employees, including certain of the
Companys executive officers, pursuant to which a portion
of their compensation will be based on the cash returns realized
by the Company on its existing investments and new investments
designated by the Board. It is anticipated that the
Companys investments will be held by individual limited
partnerships or other legal entities which will be the basis for
incentives granted under the programs. The Companys
executive officers may have interests tied both to the
performance of a particular investment as well as interests
relating to the performance of the portfolio of investments as a
whole. The Company believes that the program appropriately
aligns payments to the executive officer participants and other
participating employees with the performance of the
Companys investments.
In accordance with SFAS No. 123R, the Company has
determined that the new executive incentive program qualifies as
a liability-based plan and, accordingly, the Company was
required to evaluate the components of the program to determine
the fair value of the liability, if any, to be recorded. Based
on its evaluation, the Company determined that the liability for
compensation under the executive compensation program as of
June 30, 2009 was not material.
F-176
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
Inventory
of Real Estate
|
Inventory of real estate is summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Land and land development costs
|
|
$
|
202,518
|
|
|
|
202,456
|
|
Construction costs
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
Capitalized interest
|
|
|
39,969
|
|
|
|
37,764
|
|
Other costs
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
243,564
|
|
|
|
241,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2009, inventory of real estate included
inventory related to Carolina Oak and the Land Division.
The Company reviews real estate inventory for impairment on a
project-by-project
basis in accordance with SFAS No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets (SFAS No. 144). In
accordance with SFAS No. 144, long-lived assets are
reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not
be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is
measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to
estimated future undiscounted cash flows expected to be
generated by the asset, or by using appraisals of the related
assets. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated
future undiscounted cash flows, an impairment charge is
recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the
asset exceeds its fair value.
|
|
6.
|
Property
and Equipment
|
Property and equipment at June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 is summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciable Life
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Real estate investments
|
|
30-39 years
|
|
$
|
96,888
|
|
|
|
97,113
|
|
Water and irrigation facilities
|
|
35-50 years
|
|
|
12,490
|
|
|
|
12,346
|
|
Furniture and fixtures and equipment
|
|
3-7 years
|
|
|
12,332
|
|
|
|
12,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,710
|
|
|
|
121,718
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
(15,731
|
)
|
|
|
(12,241
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
$
|
105,979
|
|
|
|
109,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense for the three months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008 was approximately $1.4 million and $612,000,
respectively. Depreciation expense for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 was approximately $3.5 million
and $1.2 million, respectively, and is included in selling,
general and administrative expenses in the accompanying
unaudited consolidated statements of operations. The increase in
depreciation expense in the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009 compared to the same 2008 periods was mainly
associated with depreciation expense related to Cores
commercial assets. Depreciation expense for these commercial
assets was not recorded for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008 as these commercial assets were classified as
discontinued operations during those periods. The commercial
assets were reclassified back to continuing operations during
the fourth quarter of 2008.
Property and equipment is stated at cost, less accumulated
depreciation and amortization, and consists primarily of land
and buildings, furniture and fixtures, leasehold improvements,
equipment and water treatment and irrigation facilities. Repairs
and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. Significant
renovations and
F-177
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
improvements that improve or extend the useful lives of assets
are capitalized. Depreciation is primarily computed on the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
assets, which generally range up to 50 years for water and
irrigation facilities, 40 years for buildings, and
7 years for equipment, furniture and fixtures. Leasehold
improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over
the shorter of the terms of the related leases or the useful
lives of the assets. In cases where the Company determines that
land and the related development costs are to be used as fixed
assets, the costs are transferred from inventory of real estate
to property and equipment.
Interest incurred relating to land under development and
construction is capitalized to real estate inventory or property
and equipment during the active development period. For
inventory, interest is capitalized at the effective rates paid
on borrowings during the pre-construction and planning stages
and the periods that projects are under development.
Capitalization of interest is discontinued if development ceases
at a project. Capitalized interest is expensed as a component of
cost of sales as related homes, land and units are sold. For
property and equipment under construction, interest associated
with these assets is capitalized as incurred to property and
equipment and is expensed through depreciation once the asset is
put into use. The following table is a summary of interest
incurred, capitalized and expensed, exclusive of impairment
adjustments (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Interest incurred
|
|
$
|
4,398
|
|
|
|
5,594
|
|
|
|
8,805
|
|
|
|
11,806
|
|
Interest capitalized
|
|
|
(651
|
)
|
|
|
(3,062
|
)
|
|
|
(2,285
|
)
|
|
|
(6,250
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
3,747
|
|
|
|
2,532
|
|
|
|
6,520
|
|
|
|
5,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expensed in cost of sales
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bluegreen
Corporation
At June 30, 2009, the Company owned approximately
9.5 million shares of Bluegreens common stock,
representing approximately 31% of Bluegreens outstanding
common stock. The Company accounts for its investment in
Bluegreen under the equity method of accounting. The cost of the
Bluegreen investment is adjusted to recognize the Companys
interest in Bluegreens earnings or losses. The difference
between a) the Companys ownership percentage in
Bluegreen multiplied by its earnings and b) the amount of
the Companys equity in earnings of Bluegreen as reflected
in the Companys financial statements relates to the
amortization or accretion of purchase accounting adjustments
made at the time of the acquisition of Bluegreens common
stock and a basis difference due to impairment charges recorded
on the Companys investment in Bluegreen, as described
below.
During 2008, the Company began evaluating its investment in
Bluegreen on a quarterly basis for
other-than-temporary
impairments in accordance with FSP
FAS 115-1/FAS 124-1,
The Meaning of
Other-than-Temporary
Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments
(FSP
FAS 115-1/FAS 124-1),
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 18, The
Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common
Stock, and Securities and Exchange (SEC)
Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 59. These
evaluations generally include an analysis of various
quantitative and qualitative factors relating to the performance
of Bluegreen and its stock price. The Company values
Bluegreens common stock using a market approach valuation
technique and Level 1 valuation inputs under
SFAS No. 157. Based on the results of its evaluations
during the quarters ended September 30, 2008,
December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009, the
F-178
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Company determined that
other-than-temporary
impairments were necessary for those periods. As a result, the
Company recorded impairment charges of $53.6 million,
$40.8 million and $20.4 million during the quarters
ended September 30, 2008, December 31, 2008 and
March 31, 2009, respectively. Based on its impairment
evaluation performed during the quarter ended June 30,
2009, the Company determined that its investment in Bluegreen
was not impaired at June 30, 2009. As of June 30,
2009, the carrying value of the Companys investment in
Bluegreen was $28.6 million.
As a result of the impairment charges taken at
September 30, 2008, December 31, 2008 and
March 31, 2009, a basis difference was created between the
Companys investment in Bluegreen and the underlying assets
and liabilities carried on the books of Bluegreen. Therefore,
earnings from Bluegreen will be adjusted each period to reflect
the amortization of this basis difference. As such, the Company
established an allocation methodology by which the Company
allocated the impairment loss to the relative fair value of
Bluegreens underlying assets based upon the position that
the impairment loss was a reflection of the perceived value of
these underlying assets. The appropriate amortization will be
calculated based on the useful lives of the underlying assets
and other relevant data associated with each asset category. As
such, amortization of $8.6 million and $13.9 million,
respectively, was recorded into the Companys pro rata
share of Bluegreens net income for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009.
The following table shows the reconciliation of the
Companys pro rata share of Bluegreens net income to
the Companys total earnings from Bluegreen recorded in the
unaudited consolidated statements of operations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
Pro rata share of Bluegreens net income
|
|
$
|
2,076
|
|
|
|
3,158
|
|
Amortization of basis difference
|
|
|
8,638
|
|
|
|
13,892
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earnings from Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
$
|
10,714
|
|
|
|
17,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table shows the reconciliation of the
Companys pro rata share of its net investment in Bluegreen
and its investment in Bluegreen after impairment charges at
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Pro rata share of investment in Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
$
|
35,089
|
|
|
|
115,065
|
|
Amortization of basis difference
|
|
|
13,892
|
|
|
|
9,150
|
|
Less: Impairment of investment in Bluegreen Corporation during
the three months ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
(20,401
|
)
|
|
|
(94,426
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
$
|
28,580
|
|
|
|
29,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-179
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Bluegreens unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets
and unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income are as
follows (in thousands):
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,196,265
|
|
|
|
1,193,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
764,147
|
|
|
|
781,522
|
|
Total Bluegreen shareholders equity
|
|
|
399,864
|
|
|
|
382,467
|
|
Noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
32,254
|
|
|
|
29,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
432,118
|
|
|
|
411,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,196,265
|
|
|
|
1,193,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Revenues and other income
|
|
$
|
92,031
|
|
|
|
151,603
|
|
|
|
170,520
|
|
|
|
290,955
|
|
Cost and other expenses
|
|
|
86,321
|
|
|
|
144,726
|
|
|
|
157,775
|
|
|
|
280,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before noncontrolling interests and provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
5,710
|
|
|
|
6,877
|
|
|
|
12,745
|
|
|
|
9,966
|
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
|
|
|
2,654
|
|
|
|
(2,112
|
)
|
|
|
358
|
|
|
|
(2,967
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
8,364
|
|
|
|
4,765
|
|
|
|
13,103
|
|
|
|
6,999
|
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
|
|
|
(1,550
|
)
|
|
|
(1,320
|
)
|
|
|
(2,736
|
)
|
|
|
(2,158
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Bluegreen
|
|
$
|
6,814
|
|
|
|
3,445
|
|
|
|
10,367
|
|
|
|
4,841
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office
Depot Investment
At June 30, 2009, the Company owned approximately
1.4 million shares of Office Depots common stock,
representing less than 1% of Office Depots outstanding
common stock as of that date. This investment is reviewed
quarterly for
other-than-temporary
impairments in accordance with FSP
FAS 115-1/FAS 124-1
and is accounted for under the
available-for-sale
method of accounting whereby any unrealized holding gains or
losses are included in equity.
During the quarters ended December 31, 2008, March 31,
2009 and June 30, 2009, the Company performed impairment
analyses of its investment in Office Depot. The impairment
analyses included an evaluation of, among other things,
qualitative and quantitative factors relating to the performance
of Office Depot and its stock price. As a result of these
evaluations, the Company determined that
other-than-temporary
impairment charges were required at December 31, 2008 and
March 31, 2009 and recorded a $12.0 million impairment
charge relating to its investment in Office Depot in the three
months ended December 31, 2008 and an additional
$2.4 million impairment charge in the three months ended
March 31, 2009. Based on its impairment evaluation
performed during the quarter ended June 30, 2009, the
Company determined that its investment in Office Depot was not
impaired at June 30, 2009.
F-180
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Data with respect to this investment as of June 30, 2009 is
shown in the table below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Fair value at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
4,278
|
|
Other-than-temporary
impairment during
|
|
|
|
|
the three months ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
(2,396
|
)
|
Unrealized holding gain
|
|
|
4,663
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
6,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company valued Office Depots common stock using a
market approach valuation technique and Level 1 valuation
inputs under SFAS No. 157. The Company uses quoted
market prices to value equity securities. The fair value of
Office Depots common stock in the Companys unaudited
consolidated statements of financial condition at June 30,
2009 of $6.5 million was calculated based upon the $4.56
closing price of Office Depots common stock on the New
York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2009. On August 6,
2009, the closing price of Office Depots common stock was
$5.06 per share.
The table below shows the amount of gains and
other-than-temporary
losses reclassified out of other comprehensive gain (loss) into
net income (loss) for the period (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period
|
|
$
|
4,663
|
|
|
|
1,451
|
|
|
|
2,267
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net
income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,178
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,178
|
)
|
Add: Reclassification adjustment for
other-than-temporary
losses included in net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gain (loss) on securities
|
|
$
|
4,663
|
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
4,663
|
|
|
|
(553
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-181
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The Companys outstanding debt as of June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 amounted to $348.5 million and
$350.0 million, respectively.
The following table summarizes the Companys outstanding
notes and mortgage notes payable at June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008. These notes accrue interest at fixed
rates and variable rates which are tied to the Prime Rate
and/or LIBOR
rate (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Maturity Date
|
|
5.50% Commercial development mortgage note payable(a)
|
|
$
|
58,262
|
|
|
|
58,262
|
|
|
June 2012
|
2.06% Commercial development mortgage note payable
|
|
|
4,696
|
|
|
|
4,724
|
|
|
June 2010
|
2.41% Commercial development mortgage note payable
|
|
|
9,041
|
|
|
|
8,919
|
|
|
July 2010
|
5.00% Land development mortgage note payable
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
February 2012
|
3.72% Land acquisition mortgage note payable
|
|
|
22,824
|
|
|
|
23,184
|
|
|
October 2019
|
6.88% Land acquisition mortgage note payable
|
|
|
4,808
|
|
|
|
4,928
|
|
|
October 2019
|
3.06% Land acquisition mortgage note payable(b)
|
|
|
86,392
|
|
|
|
86,922
|
|
|
June 2011
|
3.25% Borrowing base facility
|
|
|
37,174
|
|
|
|
37,458
|
|
|
March 2011
|
5.47% Other mortgage note payable
|
|
|
11,712
|
|
|
|
11,831
|
|
|
April 2015
|
6.00% 6.13% Development bonds
|
|
|
3,281
|
|
|
|
3,291
|
|
|
May 2035
|
6.50% 9.15% Other borrowings
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
August 2009 June 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
263,464
|
|
|
|
264,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Core has a credit agreement with a financial institution which
provides for borrowings of up to $64.3 million. The credit
agreement had an original maturity date of June 26, 2009
and a variable interest rate of
30-day LIBOR
plus 170 basis points or Prime Rate. During June 2009, the
loan agreement was modified to extend the maturity date to June
2012. The loan, as modified, bears interest at a fixed interest
rate of 5.5%. The terms of the modification also required Core
to pledge approximately 10 acres of additional collateral.
The new terms of the loan also include a debt service coverage
ratio covenant of 1.10:1 and the elimination of a loan to value
covenant. As of June 30, 2009, the loan had an outstanding
balance of $58.3 million. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
In January of 2009, Core was advised by one of its lenders that
the lender had received an external appraisal on the land that
serves as collateral for a development mortgage note payable,
which had an outstanding balance of $86.4 million at
June 30, 2009. The appraised value would suggest the
potential for a re-margining payment to bring the note payable
back in line with the minimum
loan-to-value
requirement. The lender is conducting its internal review
procedures, including the determination of the appraised value.
As of the date of this filing, Core is in discussions with the
lender to restructure the loan which may eliminate any
re-margining requirements; however, there is no assurance that
these discussions will be successful or that re-margining
payments will not otherwise be required in the future. |
Certain of Cores debt facilities contain financial
covenants generally requiring certain net worth, liquidity and
loan to value ratios. Further, certain of Cores debt
facilities contain cross-default provisions under which a
default on one loan with a lender could cause a default on other
debt instruments with the same lender. If
F-182
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Core fails to comply with any of these restrictions or
covenants, the lenders under the applicable debt facilities
could cause Cores debt to become due and payable prior to
maturity. These accelerations or significant re-margining
payments could require Core to dedicate a substantial portion of
its cash to pay its debt and reduce its ability to use its cash
to fund its operations. If Core does not have sufficient cash to
satisfy these required payments, then Core would need to seek to
refinance the debt or obtain alternative funds, which may not be
available on attractive terms, if at all. In the event that Core
is unable to refinance its debt or obtain additional funds, it
may default on some or all of its existing debt facilities.
The following table summarizes the Companys junior
subordinated debentures at June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Optional
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Redemption
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Date
|
|
8.11% Levitt Capital Trust I
|
|
$
|
23,196
|
|
|
|
23,196
|
|
|
March 2035
|
|
March 2010
|
8.09% Levitt Capital Trust II
|
|
|
30,928
|
|
|
|
30,928
|
|
|
July 2035
|
|
July 2010
|
9.25% Levitt Capital Trust III
|
|
|
15,464
|
|
|
|
15,464
|
|
|
June 2036
|
|
June 2011
|
9.35% Levitt Capital Trust IV
|
|
|
15,464
|
|
|
|
15,464
|
|
|
September 2036
|
|
September 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
85,052
|
|
|
|
85,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.
|
Fair
Value Measurements
|
Estimated fair values of financial instruments are determined
using available market information and appropriate valuation
methodologies. However, judgments are involved in interpreting
market data to develop estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the
estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of
amounts the Company could realize in a current market
transaction.
The estimated fair values of cash, cash equivalents, short-term
investments, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate
their respective carrying values as of June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 because of the liquid nature of the
assets and relatively short-term maturities of the obligations.
The Company estimates that the fair value of its notes
receivable at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were
approximately $4.5 million and $4.0 million,
respectively, and were based upon the Prime rate. The Company
estimates that at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
the fair value of its fixed rate debt was approximately
$109.9 million and $31.7 million, respectively, and
the fair value of its variable rate debt was approximately
$178.0 million and $227.1 million, respectively.
On January 1, 2008, the Company partially adopted
SFAS No. 157, which, among other things, defines fair
value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair
value and expands disclosure for each major asset and liability
category measured at fair value on either a recurring or
nonrecurring basis. SFAS No. 157 clarifies that fair
value is an exit price, representing the amount that would
either be received to sell an asset or be paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants.
As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be
determined based on assumptions that market participants would
use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering
such assumptions, SFAS No. 157 establishes a
three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs
used in measuring fair value as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2. Inputs, other than the quoted prices in
active markets, that are observable either directly or
indirectly; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which
there is little or no market data, which require the reporting
entity to develop its own assumptions.
|
F-183
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Investments Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Fair Value at
|
|
|
|
Hierarchy
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
Investment in other equity securities
|
|
Level 1
|
|
$
|
6,545
|
|
Investments Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Fair Value at
|
|
|
|
Hierarchy
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
Investment in Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
Level 1
|
|
$
|
23,984
|
|
Investment in unconsolidated trusts
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
1,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis Using
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in
|
|
|
|
Unconsolidated
|
|
|
|
Trusts
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
419
|
|
Total unrealized gains
|
|
|
632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
1,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company
had outstanding surety bonds of approximately $5.4 million
and $8.2 million, respectively, which were related
primarily to obligations to various governmental entities to
construct improvements in various communities. The Company
currently estimates that approximately $1.1 million of work
remains to complete these improvements and that further
improvements to developments not being pursued will not be
required. Accordingly, the Company does not believe that any
material amounts will likely be drawn on the outstanding surety
bonds.
On November 9, 2007, Woodbridge implemented an employee
fund and indicated that it would pay up to $5 million of
severance benefits to terminated Levitt and Sons employees to
supplement the limited termination benefits which Levitt and
Sons was permitted to pay to those employees. Levitt and Sons
was restricted in the payment of termination benefits to its
former employees by virtue of the Chapter 11 Cases.
The following table summarizes the restructuring related
accruals activity recorded for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractor
|
|
|
Surety Bond
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Agreements
|
|
|
Accrual
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
|
597
|
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
|
|
2,574
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
(388
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(822
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
1,107
|
|
|
|
1,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The severance related and benefits accrual includes severance
payments, payroll taxes and other benefits related to the
terminations of Levitt and Sons employees, as well as other
employees of the Company, that occurred in 2007 as part of the
Chapter 11 Cases. The Company did not incur any significant
severance and benefits related restructuring charges in the
three months ended June 30, 2009, while, during the three
months
F-184
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
ended June 30, 2008, the Company incurred charges of
approximately $816,000. During the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company incurred severance and
benefits related restructuring charges of approximately $82,000
and $2.0 million, respectively. For the three months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company paid approximately
$79,000 and $1.2 million, respectively, in severance and
termination charges related to the above described employee fund
as well as severance for employees other than Levitt and Sons
employees, all of which are reflected in the Other Operations
segment. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
these payments amounted to approximately $211,000 and
$2.7 million, respectively. Employees entitled to
participate in the fund either received a payment stream, which
in certain cases extended over two years, or a lump sum payment,
dependent on a variety of factors. Former Levitt and Sons
employees who received these payments were required to assign to
the Company their unsecured claims against Levitt and Sons.
The facilities accrual as of June 30, 2009 represents
expense associated with property and equipment leases that the
Company had entered into that are no longer providing a benefit
to the Company, as well as termination fees related to
contractual obligations the Company cancelled. Included in this
amount are future minimum lease payments, fees and expenses for
which the provisions of SFAS No. 146,
Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal
Activities were satisfied. Total cash payments related
to the facilities accrual were $93,000 and $173,000 for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Total cash payments related to the facilities accrual were
$186,000 and $259,000 for the six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2008, respectively.
The independent contractor agreements accrual relates to two
consulting agreements entered into by Woodbridge with former
Levitt and Sons employees. The total commitment related to these
agreements as of June 30, 2009 was approximately $248,000
and will be paid monthly through December 2009. During the three
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company paid
$182,000 and $206,000, respectively, under these agreements.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the
Company paid $388,000 and $412,000, respectively, under these
agreements.
Levitt and Sons had approximately $33.3 million of surety
bonds outstanding related to its ongoing projects at the time of
the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases. In the event that these
obligations are drawn and paid by the surety, Woodbridge could
be responsible for up to $11.7 million plus costs and
expenses in accordance with the surety indemnity agreements
executed by Woodbridge. At each of June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, the Company had $1.1 million in
surety bonds accrual at Woodbridge related to certain bonds
where management believes it to be probable that the Company
will be required to reimburse the surety under applicable
indemnity agreements. The Company did not reimburse any amounts
during the three months ended June 30, 2009, while it
reimbursed approximately $367,000 during the three months ended
June 30, 2008 in accordance with the indemnity agreement
for bond claims paid during the period. For the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company reimbursed the surety
approximately $37,000 and $532,000, respectively. It is unclear
whether and to what extent the remaining outstanding surety
bonds of Levitt and Sons will be drawn and the extent to which
Woodbridge may be responsible for additional amounts beyond this
accrual. There is no assurance that the Company will not be
responsible for amounts in excess of the $1.1 million
accrual. Woodbridge will not receive any repayment, assets or
other consideration as recovery of any amounts it may be
required to pay. In September 2008, a surety filed a lawsuit to
require Woodbridge to post collateral against a portion of the
$11.7 million surety bonds exposure relating to two bonds
totaling $5.4 million after a municipality made claims
against the surety. The Company believes that the municipality
does not have the right to demand payment under the bonds and
initiated a lawsuit against the municipality. Because the
Company does not believe a loss is probable, the Company did not
accrue any amount in connection with this claim as of
June 30, 2009. As claims have been made on the bonds, the
surety requested the Company post a $4.0 million letter of
credit as security while the matter is litigated with the
municipality, and the Company has complied with that request.
F-185
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
At June 30, 2009, the Company had $2.4 million in
unrecognized tax benefits related to FASB Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes an interpretation of FASB
No. 109 (FIN No. 48).
FIN No. 48 provides guidance for how a company should
recognize, measure, present and disclose in its financial
statements uncertain tax positions that a company has taken or
expects to take on a tax return.
|
|
12.
|
Development
Bonds Payable
|
In connection with the development of certain of Cores
projects, community development, special assessment or
improvement districts have been established and may utilize
tax-exempt bond financing to fund construction or acquisition of
certain
on-site and
off-site infrastructure improvements near or at these
communities. The obligation to pay principal and interest on the
bonds issued by the districts is assigned to each parcel within
the district, and a priority assessment lien may be placed on
benefited parcels to provide security for the debt service. The
bonds, including interest and redemption premiums, if any, and
the associated priority lien on the property are typically
payable, secured and satisfied by revenues, fees, or assessments
levied on the property benefited. Core is required to pay the
revenues, fees, and assessments levied by the districts on the
properties it still owns that are benefited by the improvements.
Core may also be required to pay down a specified portion of the
bonds at the time each unit or parcel is sold. The costs of
these obligations are capitalized to inventory during the
development period and recognized as cost of sales when the
properties are sold.
Cores bond financing at June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 consisted of district bonds totaling
$218.7 million at each of these dates with outstanding
amounts of approximately $143.6 million and
$130.5 million, respectively. Further, at June 30,
2009, approximately $68.4 million were available under
these bonds to fund future development expenditures. Bond
obligations at June 30, 2009 mature in 2035 and 2040. As of
June 30, 2009, Core owned approximately 16% of the property
subject to assessments within the community development district
and approximately 91% of the property subject to assessments
within the special assessment district. During the three months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, Core recorded approximately
$158,000 and $163,000, respectively, in assessments on property
owned by it in the districts. During the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, Core recorded approximately
$317,000 and $268,000, respectively, in assessments on property
owned by it in the districts. Core is responsible for any
assessed amounts until the underlying property is sold and will
continue to be responsible for the annual assessments if the
property is never sold. In addition, Core has guaranteed
payments for assessments under the district bonds in Tradition,
Florida which would require funding if future assessments to be
allocated to property owners are insufficient to repay the
bonds. Management has evaluated this exposure based upon the
criteria in SFAS No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies, and has determined that there have been
no substantive changes to the projected density or land use in
the development subject to the bond which would make it probable
that Core would have to fund future shortfalls in assessments.
In accordance with EITF Issue
No. 91-10,
Accounting for Special Assessments and Tax Increment
Financing, the Company records a liability for the
estimated developer obligations that are fixed and determinable
and user fees that are required to be paid or transferred at the
time the parcel or unit is sold to an end user. At each of
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the liability
related to developer obligations associated with Cores
ownership of the property was $3.3 million. This liability
is included in the accompanying unaudited consolidated
statements of financial condition as of June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008.
|
|
13.
|
Earnings
(Loss) per Share and Stock Repurchases
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common share is computed by dividing
earnings (loss) attributable to common shareholders by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the
period. Diluted earnings
F-186
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(loss) per common share is computed in the same manner as basic
earnings (loss) per common share, taking into consideration
(a) the dilutive effect of the Companys stock options
and restricted stock using the treasury stock method and
(b) the pro rata impact of Bluegreens dilutive
securities (stock options and convertible securities) on the
amount of Bluegreens earnings recognized by the Company.
For the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, 314,571
and 290,368 shares of common stock equivalents,
respectively, at various prices were not included in the
computation of diluted (loss) earnings per common share because
the exercise prices were greater than the average market price
of the common shares and, therefore, their effect would be
antidilutive. For the six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008, 314,571 and 287,368 shares of common stock
equivalents, respectively, at various prices were not included
in the computation of diluted (loss) earnings per common share
because the exercise prices were greater than the average market
price of the common shares and, therefore, their effect would be
antidilutive.
The following table presents the computation of basic and
diluted earnings (loss) per common share (in thousands, except
for per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Woodbridge basic
|
|
$
|
677
|
|
|
|
(8,942
|
)
|
|
|
15,452
|
|
|
|
(19,373
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Woodbridge basic
|
|
$
|
677
|
|
|
|
(8,942
|
)
|
|
|
15,452
|
|
|
|
(19,373
|
)
|
Pro rata share of the net effect of Bluegreen dilutive securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) attributable to Woodbridge
diluted
|
|
$
|
677
|
|
|
|
(8,947
|
)
|
|
|
15,452
|
|
|
|
(19,380
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic average shares outstanding
|
|
|
16,893
|
|
|
|
19,255
|
|
|
|
16,890
|
|
|
|
19,255
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock options and unvested restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
16,893
|
|
|
|
19,255
|
|
|
|
16,890
|
|
|
|
19,255
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share attributable to Woodbridge
common shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
(0.46
|
)
|
|
|
0.91
|
|
|
|
(1.01
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
(0.46
|
)
|
|
|
0.91
|
|
|
|
(1.01
|
)
|
Stock
Repurchases
In November 2008, the Companys Board of Directors approved
a stock repurchase program which authorized Woodbridge to
repurchase up to 5 million shares of its Class A
Common Stock from time to time on the open market or in private
transactions. In the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company
repurchased 2,385,624 shares at an aggregate cost of
$1.4 million. These repurchased shares were canceled and
retired in February 2009. In the first quarter of 2009, the
Company repurchased 19,393 shares at an aggregate cost of
$13,000. These repurchased shares were canceled and retired in
April 2009. All shares repurchased are recorded as treasury
stock until such time as they are canceled and retired. At
June 30, 2009, 2,594,983 shares remained available for
repurchase under the stock repurchase program. There can be no
assurance that Woodbridge will repurchase any or all of the
shares which remain available for repurchase under the program,
and the level of future repurchases will depend on a number of
factors, including levels of cash generated
F-187
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
from operations, cash requirements for acquisitions and
investment opportunities, repayment of debt, the Companys
current stock price, and other factors. The stock repurchase
program does not have an expiration date and may be modified or
discontinued at any time.
The following table summarizes other revenues (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Lease/rental income
|
|
$
|
2,413
|
|
|
|
2,219
|
|
|
|
4,693
|
|
|
|
4,719
|
|
Marketing fees
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
339
|
|
Impact fees
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
Franchise revenue
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
|
|
Irrigation revenue
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other revenues
|
|
$
|
3,046
|
|
|
|
2,744
|
|
|
|
5,936
|
|
|
|
5,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys provision for income taxes is estimated to
result in an effective tax rate of 0.0% in 2009. The effective
tax rate used for the three and six months ended June 30,
2008 was 0.0%. The 0.0% effective tax rate is a result of the
Company recording a valuation allowance for those deferred tax
assets that are not expected to be recovered in the future. Due
to large losses in the past and expected taxable losses in the
foreseeable future, the Company may not have sufficient taxable
income of the appropriate character in the future to realize any
portion of the net deferred tax asset.
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to
U.S. federal income tax as well as to income tax in Florida
and South Carolina. The Company has effectively settled all
U.S. federal income tax matters for years through 2004. All
years subsequent to 2004 remain open and subject to examination.
The Companys Federal income tax returns for 2005, 2006 and
2007 are currently being examined by the Internal Revenue
Service.
|
|
16.
|
Interest
and Other Income
|
Interest and other income is summarized as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
166
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
2,101
|
|
Gain on sale of other equity securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,178
|
|
Forfeited deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest and other income
|
|
$
|
277
|
|
|
|
1,950
|
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
|
3,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating segments are components of an enterprise about which
separate financial information is available that is regularly
reviewed by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how
to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company
has two reportable business segments, Land and Other Operations.
The Company evaluates segment performance primarily based on
pre-tax income before
F-188
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
noncontrolling interests. The information provided for segment
reporting is based on managements internal reports. Except
as otherwise indicated herein, the accounting policies of the
segments are the same as those of the Company. Eliminations
consist of the elimination of transactions between the Land
Division and Other Operations segments. All of the eliminated
transactions were recorded based upon terms that management
believed would be attained in an arms-length transaction.
The presentation and allocation of assets, liabilities and
results of operations may not reflect the actual economic costs
of the segments as stand-alone businesses. If a different basis
of allocation were utilized, the relative contributions of the
segments might differ, but management believes that the relative
trends in segments would likely not be impacted.
The Companys Land Division segment consists of the
operations of Core Communities. The Other Operations segment
consists of the operations of the Parent Company, Pizza Fusion,
and Carolina Oak, other activities through Cypress Creek Capital
and Snapper Creek, an equity investment in Bluegreen and an
investment in Office Depot.
The following tables present segment information as of and for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2009
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of real estate
|
|
$
|
1,408
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
1,767
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
2,533
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
3,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
3,941
|
|
|
|
841
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
4,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales of real estate
|
|
|
1,113
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1,301
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
5,162
|
|
|
|
5,209
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
10,349
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
1,301
|
|
|
|
2,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
7,576
|
|
|
|
7,828
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
15,397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,714
|
|
Interest and other income
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(3,505
|
)
|
|
|
3,897
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
(Provision) benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(3,505
|
)
|
|
|
3,897
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
Add: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to Woodbridge
|
|
$
|
(3,505
|
)
|
|
|
4,167
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory of real estate
|
|
$
|
209,149
|
|
|
|
35,565
|
|
|
|
(1,150
|
)
|
|
|
243,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
329,889
|
|
|
|
201,526
|
|
|
|
(1,150
|
)
|
|
|
530,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
214,389
|
|
|
|
134,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
348,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
246,754
|
|
|
|
145,523
|
|
|
|
(8,025
|
)
|
|
|
384,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
$
|
83,135
|
|
|
|
56,003
|
|
|
|
6,875
|
|
|
|
146,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-189
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of real estate
|
|
$
|
1,711
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
2,395
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
2,493
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
4,204
|
|
|
|
886
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
5,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales of real estate
|
|
|
1,145
|
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
1,758
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
5,320
|
|
|
|
7,651
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
12,952
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
871
|
|
|
|
2,104
|
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
|
|
2,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
7,336
|
|
|
|
10,342
|
|
|
|
(436
|
)
|
|
|
17,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
Interest and other income
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
1,732
|
|
|
|
(443
|
)
|
|
|
1,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(2,471
|
)
|
|
|
(6,513
|
)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
(8,942
|
)
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(2,471
|
)
|
|
|
(6,513
|
)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
(8,942
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory of real estate
|
|
$
|
200,976
|
|
|
|
48,620
|
|
|
|
(7,411
|
)
|
|
|
242,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
362,709
|
|
|
|
316,389
|
|
|
|
(5,387
|
)
|
|
|
673,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
202,165
|
|
|
|
136,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
338,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
239,666
|
|
|
|
181,958
|
|
|
|
11,227
|
|
|
|
432,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
123,043
|
|
|
|
134,431
|
|
|
|
(16,614
|
)
|
|
|
240,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-190
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of real estate
|
|
$
|
2,835
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
3,194
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
4,810
|
|
|
|
1,143
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
5,936
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
7,645
|
|
|
|
1,463
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
9,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales of real estate
|
|
|
1,806
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1,994
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
11,409
|
|
|
|
9,716
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
21,103
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
2,671
|
|
|
|
3,849
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
15,886
|
|
|
|
13,738
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
29,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,050
|
|
Impairment of investment in Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,401
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,401
|
)
|
Impairment of other investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,396
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,396
|
)
|
Gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,985
|
|
|
|
13,384
|
|
|
|
40,369
|
|
Interest and other income
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
462
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
(7,837
|
)
|
|
|
9,425
|
|
|
|
13,390
|
|
|
|
14,978
|
|
(Provision) benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(7,837
|
)
|
|
|
9,425
|
|
|
|
13,390
|
|
|
|
14,978
|
|
Add: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to Woodbridge
|
|
$
|
(7,837
|
)
|
|
|
9,899
|
|
|
|
13,390
|
|
|
|
15,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory of real estate
|
|
$
|
209,149
|
|
|
|
35,565
|
|
|
|
(1,150
|
)
|
|
|
243,564
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
329,889
|
|
|
|
201,526
|
|
|
|
(1,150
|
)
|
|
|
530,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
214,389
|
|
|
|
134,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
348,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
246,754
|
|
|
|
145,523
|
|
|
|
(8,025
|
)
|
|
|
384,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
$
|
83,135
|
|
|
|
56,003
|
|
|
|
6,875
|
|
|
|
146,013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-191
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of real estate
|
|
$
|
1,865
|
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
2,549
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
5,198
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
7,063
|
|
|
|
1,145
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
8,257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales of real estate
|
|
|
1,173
|
|
|
|
587
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
1,786
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
10,851
|
|
|
|
14,747
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
25,579
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
1,864
|
|
|
|
4,777
|
|
|
|
(1,085
|
)
|
|
|
5,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
13,888
|
|
|
|
20,111
|
|
|
|
(1,078
|
)
|
|
|
32,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,737
|
|
Interest and other income
|
|
|
1,565
|
|
|
|
3,074
|
|
|
|
(1,085
|
)
|
|
|
3,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(5,260
|
)
|
|
|
(14,155
|
)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
(19,373
|
)
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(5,260
|
)
|
|
|
(14,155
|
)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
(19,373
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory of real estate
|
|
$
|
200,976
|
|
|
|
48,620
|
|
|
|
(7,411
|
)
|
|
|
242,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
362,709
|
|
|
|
316,389
|
|
|
|
(5,387
|
)
|
|
|
673,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
202,165
|
|
|
|
136,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
338,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
239,666
|
|
|
|
181,958
|
|
|
|
11,227
|
|
|
|
432,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
123,043
|
|
|
|
134,431
|
|
|
|
(16,614
|
)
|
|
|
240,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the ordinary course of business, certain intersegment loans
are entered into, and interest is recorded at current borrowing
rates. All interest expense and interest income associated with
these intersegment loans are eliminated in consolidation.
|
|
18.
|
Parent
Company Financial Statements
|
The Companys subordinated investment notes (the
Investment Notes) and junior subordinated debentures
(the Junior Subordinated Debentures) are direct
unsecured obligations of the Parent Company, are not guaranteed
by the Companys subsidiaries and are not collateralized by
any assets of the Company or its subsidiaries. The Parent
Company has historically relied on dividends or management fees
from its subsidiaries and earnings on its cash investments to
fund its operations, including debt service obligations relating
to its outstanding Investment Notes and Junior Subordinated
Debentures. The Company would be restricted from paying
dividends to its common shareholders if an event of default
exists under the terms of either the Investment Notes or the
Junior Subordinated Debentures.
Some of the Companys subsidiaries incur indebtedness on
terms that, among other things, require the subsidiary to
maintain certain financial ratios and a minimum net worth. These
covenants may have the effect of limiting the amount of debt
that the subsidiaries can incur in the future and restricting
payments to the Parent Company.
The accounting policies for the Parent Company are generally the
same as those policies described in the summary of significant
accounting policies outlined in the Companys audited
consolidated financial
F-192
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
statements included below. The Parent Companys interest in
its consolidated subsidiaries is reported under the equity
method of accounting for purposes of this presentation.
The Parent Company unaudited condensed statements of financial
condition at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 and
unaudited condensed statements of operations for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 are shown below (in
thousands):
Unaudited
Condensed Statements of Financial Condition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
240,588
|
|
|
|
253,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
94,575
|
|
|
|
133,487
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
146,013
|
|
|
|
119,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
240,588
|
|
|
|
253,017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited
Condensed Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Earnings from Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
$
|
10,714
|
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
17,050
|
|
|
|
1,737
|
|
Impairment of investment in Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
544
|
|
|
|
422
|
|
|
|
1,883
|
|
Gain on settlement of investment in subsidiary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
5,331
|
|
|
|
7,318
|
|
|
|
8,911
|
|
|
|
14,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
5,550
|
|
|
|
(5,563
|
)
|
|
|
15,145
|
|
|
|
(11,104
|
)
|
(Provision) benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) before undistributed (loss) earnings from
consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
5,550
|
|
|
|
(5,563
|
)
|
|
|
15,145
|
|
|
|
(11,104
|
)
|
(Loss) earnings from consolidated subsidiaries, net of income
taxes
|
|
|
(4,873
|
)
|
|
|
(3,379
|
)
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
(8,269
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
677
|
|
|
|
(8,942
|
)
|
|
|
15,452
|
|
|
|
(19,373
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions
|
The Company and BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. (Bancorp)
are under common control. BFC is the controlling shareholder of
the Company and Bancorp. Bancorp is the parent company of
BankAtlantic. The Companys Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer, Alan B. Levan, and the Companys Vice Chairman,
John E. Abdo, collectively own or control shares of BFCs
common stock representing a majority of BFCs total voting
power. Messrs. Levan and Abdo are also directors of the
Company and Bluegreen, and executive officers and directors of
BFC, Bancorp and BankAtlantic.
Pursuant to the terms of a shared services agreement between the
Company and BFC Shared Services Corporation, a subsidiary of
BFC, certain administrative services, including human resources,
risk management, and investor and public relations, are provided
to the Company by BFC Shared Services Corporation on a
percentage of cost basis. The total amounts paid for these
services in the three months ended June 30, 2009
F-193
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
and 2008 were approximately $260,000 and $206,000, respectively,
and for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were
approximately $560,000 and $412,000, respectively.
Effective May 2008, the Company and BFC entered into a sublease
agreement pursuant to which BFC subleases to the Company space
located at the BankAtlantic corporate office for the
Companys corporate staff. During the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company paid BFC $76,000 and
$25,000, respectively, under this agreement.
Effective March 2008, the Company entered into an agreement with
BankAtlantic, pursuant to which BankAtlantic agreed to house the
Companys information technology servers and provide
hosting, security and managed services to the Company relating
to its information technology operations. During the six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company paid BankAtlantic
approximately $70,000 and $30,000, respectively, under this
agreement.
The amounts paid by the Company to BFC and BankAtlantic for the
services described above may not be representative of the
amounts that would be paid in an arms-length transaction.
The Company maintains money market accounts and securities sold
under repurchase agreements at BankAtlantic. The balances in its
accounts at June 30, 2009 and 2008 were approximately
$6.1 million and $55.7 million, respectively.
BankAtlantic paid interest to the Company on its accounts for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 of $9,000 and
$28,000, respectively, and for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2008 of $9,000 and $30,000, respectively.
Additionally, in December 2008, BankAtlantic facilitated the
placement of certificates of deposits insured by the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (the FDIC) with other
insured depository institutions on the Companys behalf
through the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service
(CDARS) program. The CDARS program facilitates the
placement of funds into certificates of deposits issued by other
financial institutions in increments of less than the standard
FDIC insurance maximum to insure that both principal and
interest are eligible for full FDIC insurance coverage. At
June 30, 2009, the Companys placements under the
CDARS program with maturity dates of less than 3 months
totaled $1.9 million, while placements with maturity dates
of more than 3 months totaled $49.9 million.
The Company is currently working with Bluegreen to explore
avenues for assisting Bluegreen in obtaining liquidity for its
receivables, which may include, among other potential
alternatives, Woodbridge forming a broker dealer to raise
capital through private or public offerings, among other things.
Bluegreen has agreed to reimburse the Company for certain
expenses, including legal and professional fees incurred in
connection with this effort. As of June 30, 2009, the
Company was reimbursed approximately $602,000 from Bluegreen and
has recorded a receivable of approximately $481,000.
On July 2, 2009, the Company entered into a definitive
merger agreement with BFC, pursuant to which the Company will be
merged with and into a wholly-owned subsidiary of BFC. See
Note 23 and the other information contained herein
regarding the proposed merger for a description of the merger
agreement and the merger.
|
|
20.
|
New
Accounting Pronouncements
|
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168,
The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles a replacement of FASB Statement
No. 162 (SFAS No. 168).
SFAS No. 168 replaces SFAS No. 162,
The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles, and establishes the FASB Accounting
Standards Codification (Codification) as the source
of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to
be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of
financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP). Rules and interpretive
releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws
are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The
FASB will no longer issue new standards in the form of
Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force
Abstracts; instead the FASB will issue
F-194
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Accounting Standards Updates. Accounting Standards Updates will
not be authoritative in their own right as they will only serve
to update the Codification. The issuance of
SFAS No. 168 and the Codification does not change
GAAP. SFAS No. 168 becomes effective for the period
ending September 30, 2009. The Company has determined that
the adoption of SFAS No. 168 will not impact the
Companys financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167,
Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)
(SFAS No. 167). SFAS No. 167
amends FASB Interpretation No. 46 (Revised December 2003),
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
an interpretation of ARB No. 51,
(FIN 46(R)) to require an enterprise to
perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprises
variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial
interest in a variable interest entity; to require ongoing
reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary
beneficiary of a variable interest entity; to eliminate the
quantitative approach previously required for determining the
primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity; to add an
additional reconsideration event for determining whether an
entity is a variable interest entity when any changes in facts
and circumstances occur such that holders of the equity
investment at risk, as a group, lose the power from voting
rights or similar rights of those investments to direct the
activities of the entity that most significantly impact the
entitys economic performance; and to require enhanced
disclosures that will provide users of financial statements with
more transparent information about an enterprises
involvement in a variable interest entity.
SFAS No. 167 becomes effective on January 1,
2010. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact
of SFAS No. 167 on the Companys financial
statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166,
Accounting for Transfers of Financial
Assets an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 140 (SFAS No. 166).
SFAS No. 166 amends various provisions of
SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of
Liabilities a replacement of FASB Statement
No. 125, by removing the concept of a qualifying
special-purpose entity and, among other things, removes the
exception from applying FIN 46(R) to variable interest
entities that are qualifying special-purpose entities; limits
the circumstances in which a transferor derecognizes a portion
or component of a financial asset; defines a participating
interest; requires a transferor to recognize and initially
measure at fair value all assets obtained and liabilities
incurred as a result of a transfer accounted for as a sale; and
requires enhanced disclosure. SFAS No. 166 becomes
effective January 1, 2010. The Company is currently
evaluating the potential impact of SFAS No. 166 on the
Companys financial statements.
Class Action
Litigation
On January 25, 2008, plaintiff Robert D. Dance filed a
purported class action complaint as a putative purchaser of the
Companys securities against the Company and certain of its
officers and directors, asserting claims under the federal
securities laws and seeking damages. This action was filed in
the United States District Court for the Southern District of
Florida and is captioned Dance v. Levitt Corp. et al.,
No. 08-CV-60111-DLG.
The securities litigation purports to be brought on behalf of
all purchasers of the Companys securities during the
period beginning on January 31, 2007 and ending on
August 14, 2007. The complaint alleges that the defendants
violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and
Rule 10b-5
promulgated thereunder by issuing a series of false
and/or
misleading statements concerning the Companys financial
results, prospects and condition. The Company intends to
vigorously defend this action.
Surety
Bond Claim
In September 2008, a surety filed a lawsuit to require
Woodbridge to post $5.4 million of collateral relating to
two bonds totaling $5.4 million after a municipality made
claims against the surety. The Company believes that the
municipality does not have the right to demand payment under the
bonds and initiated a lawsuit against the municipality. Because
the Company does not believe a loss is probable, the Company did
not accrue any amount related to this claim as of June 30,
2009. As claims have been made on the bonds, the
F-195
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
surety requested the Company post a $4.0 million letter of
credit as security while the matter is litigated with the
municipality, and the Company has complied with that request.
General
Litigation
The Company is a party to various claims and lawsuits which
arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company does not
believe that the ultimate resolution of these claims or lawsuits
will have a material adverse effect on its business, financial
position, results of operations or cash flows.
|
|
22.
|
Bankruptcy
of Levitt and Sons
|
As described in Note 1 above, on November 9, 2007, the
Debtors filed the Chapter 11 Cases. The Debtors commenced
the Chapter 11 Cases in order to preserve the value of
their assets and to facilitate an orderly wind-down of their
businesses and disposition of their assets in a manner intended
to maximize the recoveries of all constituents. In connection
with the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases, Woodbridge
deconsolidated Levitt and Sons as of November 9, 2007. As a
result of the deconsolidation, Woodbridge had a negative basis
in its investment in Levitt and Sons because Levitt and Sons
generated significant losses and intercompany liabilities in
excess of its asset balances. This negative investment,
Loss in excess of investment in subsidiary, was
reflected as a single amount on the Companys consolidated
statements of financial condition as a $55.2 million
liability as of December 31, 2008. This balance was
comprised of a negative investment in Levitt and Sons of
$123.0 million and outstanding advances due to Woodbridge
from Levitt and Sons of $67.8 million. Included in the
negative investment was approximately $15.8 million
associated with deferred revenue related to intra-segment sales
between Levitt and Sons and Core Communities. During the fourth
quarter of 2008, the Company identified approximately
$2.3 million of deferred revenue on intercompany sales
between Core and Carolina Oak that had been misclassified
against the negative investment in Levitt and Sons. As a result,
the Company recorded a $2.3 million reclassification in the
fourth quarter of 2008 between inventory of real estate and the
loss in excess of investment in subsidiary in the consolidated
statements of financial condition. As a result, as of
December 31, 2008, the net negative investment was
$52.9 million.
On June 27, 2008, Woodbridge entered into a settlement
agreement (the Settlement Agreement) with the
Debtors and the Joint Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the
Joint Committee) appointed in the Chapter 11
Cases. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, among other things,
(i) Woodbridge agreed to pay to the Debtors
bankruptcy estates the sum of $12.5 million plus accrued
interest from May 22, 2008 through the date of payment,
(ii) Woodbridge agreed to waive and release substantially
all of the claims it had against the Debtors, including its
administrative expense claims through July 2008, and
(iii) the Debtors (joined by the Joint Committee) agreed to
waive and release any claims they had against Woodbridge and its
affiliates. After certain of Levitt and Sons creditors
indicated that they objected to the terms of the Settlement
Agreement and stated a desire to pursue claims against
Woodbridge, Woodbridge, the Debtors and the Joint Committee
entered into an amendment to the Settlement Agreement, pursuant
to which Woodbridge would, in lieu of the $12.5 million
payment previously agreed to, pay $8 million to the
Debtors bankruptcy estates and place $4.5 million in
a release fund to be disbursed to third party creditors in
exchange for a third party release and injunction. The amendment
also provided for an additional $300,000 payment by Woodbridge
to a deposit holders fund. The Settlement Agreement, as amended,
was subject to a number of conditions, including the approval of
the Bankruptcy Court.
As previously reported, on February 20, 2009, the
Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming a plan of
liquidation jointly proposed by Levitt and Sons and the Joint
Committee and approved the settlement pursuant to the Settlement
Agreement, as amended. No appeal or rehearing of the Bankruptcy
Courts order was timely filed by any party, and the
settlement was consummated on March 3, 2009, at which time
payment was made in accordance with the terms and conditions of
the Settlement Agreement, as amended. Under cost
F-196
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
method accounting, the cost of settlement and the related
$52.9 million liability (less $500,000 which was determined
as the settlement holdback and remained as an accrual pursuant
to the Settlement Agreement, as amended) was recognized into
income in the quarter ended March 31, 2009, resulting in a
$40.4 million gain on settlement of investment in
subsidiary. As a result, Woodbridge no longer holds an
investment in this subsidiary.
Merger
Agreement with BFC
On July 2, 2009, Woodbridge entered into a definitive
merger agreement with BFC. Subject to the terms and conditions
of the agreement, Woodbridge will become a wholly-owned
subsidiary of BFC and the holders of Woodbridges
Class A Common Stock (other than BFC) will receive
3.47 shares of BFCs Class A Common Stock for
each share of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock they
hold at the effective time of the merger. BFC currently owns
approximately 22% of Woodbridges Class A Common Stock
and all of Woodbridges Class B Common Stock,
representing approximately 59% of the total voting power of
Woodbridge. The shares of Woodbridges common stock held by
BFC will be canceled in the merger.
The consummation of the merger is subject to a number of
customary closing conditions, including the approval of both
Woodbridges and BFCs shareholders. The companies
currently expect to consummate the merger during the third
quarter of 2009. If the merger agreement is consummated,
Woodbridges separate corporate existence will cease and
its Class A Common Stock will no longer be publicly traded.
Additional
Pizza Fusion Investment
On July 2, 2009, the Company exercised its option to
purchase 521,740 shares of Series B Preferred Stock of
Pizza Fusion at a price of $1.15 per share, or an aggregate
purchase price of $600,000. Upon the exercise of the option, the
Company was also granted warrants to purchase up to 300,000
additional shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
of Pizza Fusion at an exercise price of $1.44 per share. The
warrants have a term of 10 years, subject to earlier
expiration under certain circumstances.
F-197
Report of
Independent Registered Certified Public Accounting
Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
In our opinion, based on our audits and the report of other
auditors, the consolidated financial statements listed in the
accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of Woodbridge Holdings Corporation and its
subsidiaries (the Company) at December 31, 2008
and 2007, and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2008 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition,
in our opinion, the financial statement schedule listed in the
accompanying index presents fairly, in all material respects,
the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with
the related consolidated financial statements. Also in our
opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). The Companys management is responsible for these
financial statements and financial statement schedule, for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, included in Managements Report
on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (not presented
herein) appearing under Item 9A of the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these
financial statements, on the financial statement schedule, and
on the Companys internal control over financial reporting
based on our integrated audits. We did not audit the financial
statements of Bluegreen Corporation, an approximate
31 percent-owned equity investment of the Company which
reflects a net investment totaling $115.1 million and
$116.0 million at December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, (prior to an other-than-temporary impairment
recorded by the Company of approximately $85.2 million, net
of the amortization of $9.2 million of basis difference, in
the year ending December 31, 2008) and equity in the
net earnings (loss) of approximately ($154,000) (prior to the
amortization of approximately $9.2 million related to the
change in the basis of the Companys investment as a result
of impairment charges of $94.4 million), $10.3 million
and $9.7 million for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The financial statements of
Bluegreen Corporation were audited by other auditors whose
report thereon has been furnished to us, and our opinion on the
financial statements expressed herein, insofar as it relates to
the amounts included for Bluegreen Corporation, is based solely
on the report of the other auditors. We conducted our audits in
accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement and whether effective internal control over
financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our
audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal
control over financial reporting included obtaining an
understanding of internal control over financial reporting,
assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of
internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also
included performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits and
the report of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our
opinions.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB
Interpretation No. 48 Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of
FASB No. 109 in January 1, 2007.
As discussed in Notes 2, 20 and 24, on November 9,
2007 (the Petition Date), Levitt and Sons, LLC
(Levitt and Sons) and substantially all of its
subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions for relief under
Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code in
the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of
Florida. As a result, Levitt and Sons was deconsolidated from
the Company as of the Petition Date and has been prospectively
reported as a cost method investment. On the Petition Date,
Levitt and Sons had total assets, total liabilities and net
shareholders deficit of approximately $373 million,
$480 million, and $107 million, respectively.
F-198
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
March 19, 2009
F-199
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
December 31,
2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
114,798
|
|
|
|
195,181
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
21,288
|
|
|
|
2,207
|
|
Current income tax receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,407
|
|
Inventory of real estate
|
|
|
241,318
|
|
|
|
227,290
|
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
|
29,789
|
|
|
|
116,014
|
|
Other equity securities
|
|
|
4,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposits, short-term
|
|
|
9,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unconsolidated trusts
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
2,565
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
109,477
|
|
|
|
118,243
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
4,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
23,963
|
|
|
|
23,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
559,254
|
|
|
|
712,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other
|
|
$
|
33,913
|
|
|
|
42,026
|
|
Customer deposits
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
715
|
|
Current income tax payable
|
|
|
2,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes and mortgage notes payable
|
|
|
264,900
|
|
|
|
268,738
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
85,052
|
|
|
|
85,052
|
|
Loss in excess of investment in subsidiary
|
|
|
52,887
|
|
|
|
55,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
439,724
|
|
|
|
451,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value Authorized:
5,000,000 shares Issued and outstanding: no shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A Common Stock, $0.01 par value Authorized:
30,000,000 shares Issued: 19,042,149 and
19,010,804 shares, respectively
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
Class B Common Stock, $0.01 par value Authorized:
2,000,000 shares Issued and outstanding: 243,807 shares
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
339,780
|
|
|
|
337,565
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(218,868
|
)
|
|
|
(78,537
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)income
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
1,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,969
|
|
|
|
261,106
|
|
Less common stock in treasury, at cost (2,385,624 in
2008)
|
|
|
(1,439
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
119,530
|
|
|
|
261,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
559,254
|
|
|
|
712,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-200
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
For each
of the years in the three year period ended December 31,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of real estate
|
|
$
|
13,837
|
|
|
|
410,115
|
|
|
|
566,086
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
11,701
|
|
|
|
10,458
|
|
|
|
9,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
25,538
|
|
|
|
420,573
|
|
|
|
575,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales of real estate
|
|
|
12,728
|
|
|
|
573,241
|
|
|
|
482,961
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
50,754
|
|
|
|
117,924
|
|
|
|
121,151
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
10,867
|
|
|
|
3,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,929
|
|
|
|
3,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
74,349
|
|
|
|
698,901
|
|
|
|
607,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
|
8,996
|
|
|
|
10,275
|
|
|
|
9,684
|
|
Impairment of investment in Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
|
(94,426
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of other investments
|
|
|
(14,120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income
|
|
|
8,030
|
|
|
|
11,264
|
|
|
|
7,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(140,331
|
)
|
|
|
(256,789
|
)
|
|
|
(14,934
|
)
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,169
|
|
|
|
5,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(140,331
|
)
|
|
|
(234,620
|
)
|
|
|
(9,164
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(7.35
|
)
|
|
|
(30.00
|
)
|
|
|
(2.27
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(7.35
|
)
|
|
|
(30.00
|
)
|
|
|
(2.29
|
)
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
19,088
|
|
|
|
7,821
|
|
|
|
4,045
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
19,088
|
|
|
|
7,821
|
|
|
|
4,045
|
|
Dividends declared per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A common stock
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
Class B common stock
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-201
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
For each
of the years in the three year period ended December 31,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(140,331
|
)
|
|
|
(234,620
|
)
|
|
|
(9,164
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-rata share of unrealized (loss) gain recognized by Bluegreen
Corporation on retained interests in notes receivable sold
|
|
|
(2,021
|
)
|
|
|
(870
|
)
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
(487
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-rata share of unrealized (loss) gain recognized by Bluegreen
Corporation on retained interests in notes receivable sold (net
of tax)
|
|
|
(2,021
|
)
|
|
|
(535
|
)
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(142,352
|
)
|
|
|
(235,155
|
)
|
|
|
(8,388
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-202
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
For each of the years in the three year period ended
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
in Treasury
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A
|
|
|
Class B
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
(Deficit)
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
3,723
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
181,243
|
|
|
$
|
166,969
|
|
|
$
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,645
|
|
|
$
|
349,786
|
|
Issuance of restricted common stock
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reversal of unamortized stock compensation related to restricted
stock upon adoption of FAS 123(R)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(110
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share based compensation related to stock options and restricted
stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,164
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,164
|
)
|
Pro-rata share of unrealized gain recognized by Bluegreen on
sale of retained interests, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
|
776
|
|
Issuance of Bluegreen common stock, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
Cash dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,586
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,586
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
3,724
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
184,560
|
|
|
$
|
156,219
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,421
|
|
|
$
|
343,239
|
|
Issuance of restricted common stock
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance from Rights Offering, net of issue costs
|
|
|
15,285
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,651
|
|
Share based compensation related to stock options and restricted
stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,193
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(234,620
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(234,620
|
)
|
Pro-rata share of unrealized loss recognized by Bluegreen on
sale of retained interests, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(535
|
)
|
|
|
(535
|
)
|
Issuance of Bluegreen common stock, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(279
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(279
|
)
|
Tax asset valuation allowance associated with Bluegreen capital
transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,407
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,407
|
)
|
Cash dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(396
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(396
|
)
|
Cumulative impact of change in accounting for uncertainties in
income taxes (FIN 48 see Note 16)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
19,011
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
337,565
|
|
|
$
|
(78,537
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,886
|
|
|
$
|
261,106
|
|
Issuance of restricted common stock
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,386
|
|
|
|
(1,439
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,439
|
)
|
Share based compensation related to stock options and restricted
stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
990
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(140,331
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(140,331
|
)
|
Pro-rata share of unrealized loss recognized by Bluegreen on
sale of retained interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,021
|
)
|
|
|
(2,021
|
)
|
Issuance of Bluegreen common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
19,042
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
$
|
190
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
339,780
|
|
|
$
|
(218,868
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
2,386
|
|
|
$
|
(1,439
|
)
|
|
$
|
(135
|
)
|
|
$
|
119,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
F-203
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
For each
of the years in the three year period ended December 31,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(140,331
|
)
|
|
|
(234,620
|
)
|
|
|
(9,164
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
7,341
|
|
|
|
5,207
|
|
|
|
3,703
|
|
Change in deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,187
|
)
|
|
|
(14,263
|
)
|
Earnings from Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
|
(8,996
|
)
|
|
|
(10,275
|
)
|
|
|
(9,684
|
)
|
Earnings from unconsolidated trusts
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
Impairment of investment in Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
|
94,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of other investments
|
|
|
14,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Gain) loss from real estate joint ventures
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
417
|
|
Share-based compensation expense related to stock options and
restricted stock
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
|
1,962
|
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
Gain on sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
(2,520
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,329
|
)
|
Gain on sale of equity securities
|
|
|
(1,178
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of property and equipment
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
Impairment of inventory
|
|
|
3,491
|
|
|
|
226,879
|
|
|
|
38,083
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory of real estate
|
|
|
(19,964
|
)
|
|
|
26,950
|
|
|
|
(255,968
|
)
|
Notes receivable
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
2,903
|
|
|
|
(1,640
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
2,180
|
|
|
|
5,174
|
|
Income taxes receivable
|
|
|
27,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
2,380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer deposits
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
(23,974
|
)
|
|
|
(8,990
|
)
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
(9,900
|
)
|
|
|
(31,662
|
)
|
|
|
9,824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(32,897
|
)
|
|
|
(35,297
|
)
|
|
|
(240,520
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in real estate joint ventures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(229
|
)
|
|
|
(469
|
)
|
Distributions from real estate joint ventures
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash
|
|
|
(19,081
|
)
|
|
|
(1,321
|
)
|
|
|
421
|
|
Purchase of equity securities
|
|
|
(33,978
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Pizza Fusion
|
|
|
(3,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of short-term investments
|
|
|
(9,600
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of equity securities
|
|
|
18,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in unconsolidated trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(928
|
)
|
Distributions from unconsolidated trusts
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
5,588
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
1,943
|
|
Deconsolidation of subsidiary cash balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,387
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(1,154
|
)
|
|
|
(38,749
|
)
|
|
|
(29,476
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(41,921
|
)
|
|
|
(46,389
|
)
|
|
|
(27,755
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from notes and mortgage notes payable
|
|
|
27,522
|
|
|
|
236,839
|
|
|
|
379,732
|
|
Proceeds from junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,928
|
|
Repayment of notes and mortgage notes payable
|
|
|
(31,130
|
)
|
|
|
(158,923
|
)
|
|
|
(202,927
|
)
|
Cash paid for stock repurchase
|
|
|
(1,439
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(518
|
)
|
|
|
(1,695
|
)
|
|
|
(3,043
|
)
|
Payments for stock issue costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(396
|
)
|
|
|
(1,586
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(5,565
|
)
|
|
|
228,476
|
|
|
|
203,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
(80,383
|
)
|
|
|
146,790
|
|
|
|
(65,171
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period
|
|
|
195,181
|
|
|
|
48,391
|
|
|
|
113,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
114,798
|
|
|
|
195,181
|
|
|
|
48,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid on borrowings, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
$
|
11,101
|
|
|
|
5,927
|
|
|
|
963
|
|
Income taxes (refunded) paid
|
|
|
(29,711
|
)
|
|
|
4,556
|
|
|
|
17,140
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash operating, investing and
financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in shareholders equity resulting from the change in
other comprehensive (loss) gain, net of taxes
|
|
$
|
(2,021
|
)
|
|
|
(535
|
)
|
|
|
776
|
|
Change in shareholders equity from the net effect of
Bluegreens capital transactions, net of taxes
|
|
|
1,225
|
|
|
|
(279
|
)
|
|
|
177
|
|
Decrease in inventory from reclassification to property and
equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,859
|
|
|
|
8,412
|
|
Increase in deferred tax liability due to cumulative impact of
change in accounting for uncertainties in income taxes
(FIN 48 see Note 16)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets and liabilities assumed upon acquisition of Pizza Fusion
(see Note 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At November 9, 2007, all accounts of Levitt and Sons were
deconsolidated from the Company. Refer to
(Note 24) for an analysis of the balances at the time
of deconsolidation.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-204
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
|
|
1.
|
Description
of Business
|
Woodbridge Holdings Corporation (Woodbridge or the
Company) (formerly Levitt Corporation), directly and
through its wholly owned subsidiaries, historically has been a
real estate development company with activities in the
Southeastern United States. The Company was organized in
December 1982 under the laws of the State of Florida.
Historically, the Companys operations were primarily
within the real estate industry; however, the Companys
current business strategy includes the pursuit of investments
and acquisitions within or outside of the real estate industry,
as well as the continued development of master-planned
communities. Under this business strategy, the Company likely
will not generate a consistent earnings stream and the
composition of the Companys revenues may vary widely due
to factors inherent in a particular investment, including the
maturity and cyclical nature of, and market conditions relating
to, the businesses in which the Company invests. Net investment
gains and other income will be based primarily on the success of
the Companys investments as well as overall market
conditions.
In 2008, Woodbridge engaged in business activities through the
Land Division, consisting of the operations of Core Communities,
LLC (Core Communities or Core), which
develops master-planned communities, and through the Other
Operations segment (Other Operations), which
includes the parent company operations of Woodbridge (the
Parent Company), the consolidated operations of
Pizza Fusion Holdings, Inc. (Pizza Fusion), the
consolidated operations of Carolina Oak Homes, LLC
(Carolina Oak), which engaged in homebuilding in
South Carolina prior to the suspension of those activities
during the fourth quarter of 2008, and other activities through
Cypress Creek Capital Holdings, LLC (Cypress Creek
Capital) and Snapper Creek Equity Management, LLC
(Snapper Creek). An equity investment in Bluegreen
Corporation (Bluegreen) and an investment in Office
Depot, Inc. (Office Depot) are also included in the
Other Operations segment.
Core Communities was founded in May 1996 to develop a
master-planned community in Port St. Lucie, Florida now known as
St. Lucie West. During 2008, its activities focused on the
development of a master-planned community in St. Lucie, Florida
called Tradition, Florida and a community outside of
Hardeeville, South Carolina called Tradition Hilton Head
(formerly known as Tradition, South Carolina). Tradition,
Florida has been in active development for several years, while
Tradition Hilton Head is in the early stage of development. As a
master-planned community developer, Core Communities engages in
four primary activities: (i) the acquisition of large
tracts of raw land; (ii) planning, entitlement and
infrastructure development; (iii) the sale of entitled land
and/or
developed lots to homebuilders and commercial, industrial and
institutional end-users; and (iv) the development and
leasing of commercial space to commercial, industrial and
institutional end-users.
In October 2007, Woodbridge acquired from Levitt and Sons all of
the outstanding membership interests in Carolina Oak for the
following consideration: (i) the assumption of the
outstanding principal balance of a loan in the amount of
$34.1 million which is collateralized by a 150 acre
parcel of land owned by Carolina Oak located in Tradition Hilton
Head, (ii) the execution of a promissory note in the amount
of $400,000 to serve as a deposit under a purchase agreement
between Carolina Oak and Core Communities of South Carolina, LLC
and (iii) the assumption of specified payables in the
amount of approximately $5.3 million. The principal asset
of Carolina Oak is a 150 acre parcel of land located in
Tradition Hilton Head.
Prior to November 9, 2007, the Company also conducted
homebuilding operations through Levitt and Sons, LLC
(Levitt and Sons), which comprised the
Companys Homebuilding Division. The Homebuilding Division
consisted of two reportable operating segments, the Primary
Homebuilding segment and the Tennessee Homebuilding segment.
Acquired in December 1999, Levitt and Sons was a developer of
single family homes and townhome communities for active adults
and families in Florida, Georgia, Tennessee and South Carolina.
On November 9, 2007 (the Petition Date), Levitt
and Sons and substantially all of its subsidiaries
(collectively, the Debtors) filed voluntary
petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of
the United States Code (the Chapter 11 Cases)
in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District
F-205
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
of Florida (the Bankruptcy Court). In connection
with the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases, Woodbridge
deconsolidated Levitt and Sons as of November 9, 2007,
eliminating all future operations of Levitt and Sons from
Woodbridges financial results of operations. Since Levitt
and Sons results are no longer consolidated and Woodbridge
believes that it is not probable that it will be obligated to
fund future operating losses at Levitt and Sons, any adjustments
reflected in Levitt and Sons financial statements
subsequent to November 9, 2007 are not expected to affect
the results of operations of Woodbridge.
On November 13, 2008, the Company was notified by the New
York Stock Exchange that its Class A Common Stock had
fallen below the New York Stock Exchanges continued
listing requirement regarding average global market
capitalization over a consecutive
thirty-day
trading period. As a result, the Companys Class A
Common Stock was suspended from trading on the New York Stock
Exchange beginning with the opening of trading on
November 20, 2008 and immediately began trading on the Pink
Sheets Electronic Quotation Service (Pink Sheets)
under the trading symbol WDGH.PK..
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Consolidation
Policy
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and
entities in which the Company is the primary beneficiary as
defined in Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Interpretation No. 46 (revised December
2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities (FIN No. 46(R)), or has
a controlling interest in accordance with the provisions of
Statement of Position
78-9,
Accounting for Investments in Real Estate
Ventures
(SOP 78-9),
and Emerging Issues Task Force
No. 04-5,
Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General
Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar
Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights
(EITF
No. 04-5).
Levitt and Sons is no longer a consolidated entity as described
below. All significant inter-company transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
In connection with the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases,
Woodbridge deconsolidated Levitt and Sons as of November 9,
2007, eliminating all future operations of Levitt and Sons from
its financial results of operations, and, as described above,
Woodbridge accounts for any remaining investment in Levitt and
Sons as a cost method investment.
In 2008, the Company, indirectly through its wholly-owned
subsidiary, Woodbridge Equity Fund II LP, made a
$3.0 million investment in Pizza Fusion. Pizza Fusion was
determined to be a Variable Interest Entity (VIE)
under the provisions of FIN No. 46(R) and Woodbridge
Equity Fund II, LP was determined to be the primary
beneficiary, therefore, the Company consolidated Pizza Fusion
into its consolidated financial statements as of
September 18, 2008.
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into
contracts to purchase land held for development, including
option contracts. Option contracts allow the Company to control
significant positions with minimal capital investment and
substantially reduce the risks associated with land ownership
and development. The liability for nonperformance under such
contracts is typically only the required non-refundable
deposits. The Company does not have legal title to these assets.
However, if certain conditions are met, under the requirements
of FIN No. 46(R), the Companys non-refundable
deposits in these land contracts may create a variable interest,
with the Company being identified as the primary beneficiary. If
these conditions are met, FIN No. 46(R) requires the
Company to consolidate the VIE holding the asset to be acquired
at its fair value. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, there
were no non-refundable deposits under these contracts, and the
Company had no contracts in place to acquire land.
F-206
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ significantly
from those estimates. Material estimates relate to revenue
recognition on percent complete projects, reserves and accruals,
impairment of assets, determination of the valuation of real
estate and estimated costs to complete construction, litigation
and contingencies, the current tax liability in accordance with
FIN 48, and the amount of the deferred tax asset valuation
allowance. The Company bases estimates on historical experience
and on various other assumptions that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form
the basis of making judgments about the carrying value of assets
and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Reclassification
In June 2007, Core Communities began soliciting bids from
several potential buyers to purchase assets associated with two
of Cores commercial leasing projects (the
Projects). As the criteria for assets held for sale
had been met in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets (SFAS No. 144), the
assets were reclassified to assets held for sale and the
liabilities related to those assets were reclassified to
liabilities related to assets held for sale in prior periods.
The results of operations for these assets were reclassified as
discontinued operations in the third quarter of 2007 and the
Company ceased recording depreciation expense on these Projects.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company determined that
given the difficulty in predicting the timing or probability of
a sale of the assets associated with the Projects as a result
of, among other things, the economic downturn and disruptions in
credit markets, the requirements of SFAS No. 144
necessary to classify these assets as held for sale and to be
included in discontinued operations were no longer met and the
Company could not assert the Projects can be sold within a year.
Therefore, the results of operations for these Projects were
reclassified for the three years ending December 31, 2008
back into continuing operations in the consolidated statements
of operations. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, the
Company recorded a depreciation recapture of $3.2 million
at December 31, 2008 to account for the depreciation not
recorded while the assets were classified as discontinued
operations. The Company compared the net carrying amount of the
asset, after taking into account the adjustment for depreciation
recapture, to the fair value at the date of the subsequent
decision not to sell and determined that the adjusted net
carrying value was less than the fair value on the date of the
reclassification. Total assets and liabilities related to the
Projects were $92.7 million and $76.1 million,
respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2008, and
$96.2 million and 80.1 million, respectively, for the
year ended December 31, 2007. In addition, total revenues
related to the Projects for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006 were $8.7 million, $4.7 million
and $1.8 million, respectively, while income (loss) related
to the Projects for the same periods in 2008, 2007 and 2006 was
$6.0 million, $1.8 million and $(21,000), respectively.
Loss
in excess of investment in Levitt and Sons
Under Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB)
No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements
(ARB No. 51), consolidation of a
majority-owned subsidiary is precluded where control does not
rest with the majority owners. Under these rules, legal
reorganization or bankruptcy represents conditions which can
preclude consolidation or equity method accounting as control
rests with the bankruptcy court, rather than the majority owner.
As described elsewhere in this document, Levitt and Sons, our
wholly-owned subsidiary, declared bankruptcy on November 9,
2007. Therefore, in accordance with ARB No. 51, Woodbridge
deconsolidated Levitt and Sons as of November 9, 2007,
eliminating all future operations of Levitt and Sons from
Woodbridges financial results of operations, and the
Company now follows the cost method of accounting to record its
interest in Levitt and Sons. Under cost method accounting,
income will only be
F-207
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
recognized to the extent of cash received in the future or when
Levitt and Sons is legally released from its bankruptcy
obligations through the approval of the Bankruptcy Court, at
which time, any recorded loss in excess of the investment in
Levitt and Sons can be recognized into income. (See
Notes 20 and 24 for further information regarding Levitt
and Sons and the Chapter 11 Cases).
Cash
Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of demand deposits at
commercial banks. The Company also invests in money market funds
and certificates of deposits. Certificates of deposits with
original maturities of less than three months are considered
cash and cash equivalents. The cash deposits are held primarily
at various financial institutions and exceed federally insured
amounts. However, the Company has not experienced any losses on
such accounts and management does not believe these
concentrations to be a credit risk to the Company.
Restricted
Cash
Cash and interest bearing deposits are segregated into
restricted accounts for specific uses in accordance with the
terms of certain land sale contracts, home sales and other
agreements. Restricted funds may be utilized in accordance with
the terms of the applicable governing documents. The majority of
restricted funds are controlled by third-party escrow
fiduciaries and include the amounts reserved under the Levitt
and Sons Settlement Agreement.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets consist of real estate inventory, property and
equipment and other amortizable intangible assets. In accordance
with SFAS No. 144, long-lived assets are reviewed for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a
comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated
undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the
asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated
future undiscounted cash flows, an impairment charge is
recognized in an amount by which the carrying amount of the
asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.
For projects representing land investments where homebuilding
activity had not yet begun, valuation models are used as the
best evidence of fair value and as the basis for the
measurement. If the calculated project fair value is lower than
the carrying value of the real estate inventory, an impairment
charge is recognized to reduce the carrying value of the project
to fair value.
The assumptions developed and used by management to evaluate
impairment are subjective and involve significant estimates, and
are subject to increased volatility due to the uncertainty of
the current market environment. As a result, actual results
could differ materially from managements assumptions and
estimates and may result in material impairment charges in the
future.
Short-Term
Investments
The Company considers investments with original maturities of
greater than three months and remaining maturities of less than
one year as short-term investments. Certificates of deposits
with original maturities of greater than three months and
remaining maturities of less than one year are classified as
Certificates of deposits, short term in our
consolidated statements of financial condition.
Fair
Value Measurements
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company partially adopted
the provisions of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (SFAS No. 157),
which requires the Company to disclose the fair value of its
investments in
F-208
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
unconsolidated trusts and equity securities, including the
investments in Bluegreen and Office Depot. Under this standard,
fair value is defined as the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date
(an exit price). In determining fair value, the Company is
sometimes required to use various valuation techniques.
SFAS No. 157 establishes a hierarchy for inputs used
in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable
inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring
that the most observable inputs be used when available. As a
basis for considering such assumptions, SFAS No. 157
establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes
the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
|
|
|
|
Level 2. Inputs, other than the quoted
prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or
indirectly; and
|
|
|
|
Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which
there is little or no market data, which require the reporting
entity to develop its own assumptions.
|
When valuation techniques, other than those described as
Level 1 are utilized, management must make estimations and
judgments in determining the fair value for its investments. The
degree to which managements estimation and judgment is
required is generally dependent upon the market pricing
available for the investments, the availability of observable
inputs, the frequency of trading in the investments and the
investments complexity. If management makes different
judgments regarding unobservable inputs the Company could
potentially reach different conclusions regarding the fair value
of its investments.
Investments
The Company determines the appropriate classifications of
investments in equity securities at the acquisition date and
re-evaluates the classifications at each balance sheet date. For
entities where the Company is not deemed to be the primary
beneficiary under FIN No. 46(R) or in which it has
less than a controlling financial interest evaluated under AICPA
Statement of Position
78-9,
Accounting for Investments in Real Estate
Ventures or Emerging Issues Task Force
No. 04-5,
Determining Whether a General Partner, or the General
Partners as a group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar
Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights,
these entities are accounted for using the equity or cost method
of accounting. Typically, the cost method is used if the Company
owns less than 20% of the investees stock and the equity
method is used if the Company owns more than 20% of the
investees stock. However, the Company has concluded that
the percentage ownership of stock is not the sole determinant in
applying the equity or the cost method, but the significant
factor is whether the investor has the ability to significantly
influence the operating and financial policies of the investee.
Equity
Method
The Company follows the equity method of accounting to record
its interests in entities in which it does not own the majority
of the voting stock or record its investment in VIEs in which it
is not the primary beneficiary. These entities consist of
Bluegreen Corporation and statutory business trusts. The
statutory business trusts are VIEs in which the Company is not
the primary beneficiary. Under the equity method, the initial
investment in a joint venture is recorded at cost and is
subsequently adjusted to recognize the Companys share of
the joint ventures earnings or losses. Distributions
received and other-than-temporary impairments reduce the
carrying amount of the investment.
Cost
Method
The Company uses the cost method for investments where the
Company owns less than a 20% interest and does not have the
ability to significantly influence the operating and financial
policies of the investee in
F-209
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
accordance with relative accounting guidance.
SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, requires
the Company to designate its securities as held to maturity,
available for sale, or trading, depending on the Companys
intent with regard to its investments at the time of purchase.
There are currently no securities classified as held to maturity
or trading.
Impairment
Securities classified as available-for-sale are carried at fair
value with net unrealized gains or losses reported as a
component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), but
do not impact the Companys results of operations. Changes
in fair value are taken to income when a decline in value is
considered other-than-temporary.
The Company reviews its equity and cost method investments
quarterly for indicators of other-than-temporary impairment in
accordance with FSP
FAS 115-1/FAS 124-1,
The Meaning of Other-than-Temporary Impairment and Its
Application to Certain Investments (FSP
FAS 115-1/FAS 124-1),
and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 59
(SAB No. 59). This determination requires
significant judgment in which the Company evaluates, among other
factors, the fair market value of the investments, general
market conditions, the duration and extent to which the fair
value of the investment is less than cost, and the
Companys intent and ability to hold the investment until
it recovers. The Company also considers specific adverse
conditions related to the financial health of and business
outlook for the investee, including industry and sector
performance, rating agency actions, changes in operational and
financing cash flow factors. If a decline in the fair value of
the investment is determined to be other-than-temporary, an
impairment charge is recorded to reduce the investment to its
fair value and a new cost basis in the investment is established.
Capitalized
Interest
Interest incurred relating to land under development and
construction is capitalized to real estate inventory or property
and equipment during the active development period. For
inventory, interest is capitalized at the effective rates paid
on borrowings during the pre-construction and planning stages
and the periods that projects are under development.
Capitalization of interest is discontinued if development ceases
at a project. Capitalized interest is expensed as a component of
cost of sales as related homes, land and units are sold. For
property and equipment under construction, interest associated
with these assets is capitalized as incurred to property and
equipment and is expensed through depreciation once the asset is
put into use. The following table is a summary of interest
incurred, capitalized and expensed, exclusive of impairment
adjustments (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Interest incurred
|
|
$
|
22,367
|
|
|
|
50,767
|
|
|
|
42,002
|
|
Interest capitalized
|
|
|
(11,500
|
)
|
|
|
(46,960
|
)
|
|
|
(42,002
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
10,867
|
|
|
|
3,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expensed in cost of sales
|
|
$
|
326
|
|
|
|
17,949
|
|
|
|
15,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to the above interest expensed in cost of sales, the
capitalized interest balance of inventory of real estate as of
December 31, 2008 was reduced by approximately
$2.4 million from the impairment reserve allocated to the
capitalized interest component of inventory of real estate as a
result of the Carolina Oak impairment charge recorded in the
Other Operations segment. The capitalized interest balance of
inventory of real estate as of December 31, 2007 was also
reduced by $24.8 million of impairment reserves, of which
approximately $9.3 million of these impairments related to
Woodbridges impairment of capitalized interest
F-210
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
recorded in Other Operations associated with projects at Levitt
and Sons, and the remaining $15.5 million related to the
Homebuilding segments.
Property
and Equipment
Property and equipment is stated at cost, less accumulated
depreciation and amortization, and consists primarily of land
and office buildings, furniture and fixtures, leasehold
improvements, equipment and water treatment and irrigation
facilities. Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as
incurred. Significant renovations and improvements that improve
or extend the useful lives of assets are capitalized.
Depreciation is primarily computed on the straight-line method
over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which generally
range up to 50 years for water and irrigation facilities,
40 years for buildings, and 7 years for equipment and
furniture and fixtures. Leasehold improvements are amortized
using the straight-line method over the shorter of the terms of
the related leases or the useful lives of the assets. In cases
where the Company determines that land and the related
development costs are to be used as fixed assets, these costs
are transferred from inventory of real estate to property and
equipment.
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
The Company has recorded certain intangible assets related to
its acquisition of Pizza Fusion. Intangible assets consist
primarily of franchise contracts which were valued using a
discounted cash flows methodology and are amortized over the
average life of the franchise contracts. The estimates of useful
lives and expected cash flows require the Company to make
significant judgments regarding future periods that are subject
to outside factors. In accordance with SFAS No. 144,
the Company evaluates when events and circumstances indicate
that assets may be impaired and when the undiscounted cash flows
estimated to be generated by those assets are less than their
carrying amounts. The carrying value of these assets is
dependent upon estimates of future earnings that the Company
expects to generate. If cash flows decrease significantly,
intangible assets may be impaired and would be written down to
their fair value.
On at least an annual basis, the Company conducts a review of
its goodwill in accordance with SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS No. 142), to determine whether the
carrying value of goodwill exceeds the fair market value using a
discounted cash flow methodology. In the year ended
December 31, 2006, the Company conducted an impairment
review of the goodwill related to the Tennessee Homebuilding
segment, the operations of which consisted of the activities of
Bowden Building Corporation, which the Company acquired in 2004.
The Company used a discounted cash flow methodology to determine
the amount of impairment resulting in completely writing off
goodwill of approximately $1.3 million in the year ended
December 31, 2006. The write-off is included in other
expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue and all related costs and expenses from house and land
sales are recognized at the time that closing has occurred, when
title and possession of the property and the risks and rewards
of ownership transfer to the buyer, and when the Company does
not have a substantial continuing involvement in accordance with
SFAS No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real
Estate (SFAS No. 66). In order
to properly match revenues with expenses, the Company estimates
construction and land development costs incurred and to be
incurred, but not paid at the time of closing. Estimated costs
to complete are determined for each closed home and land sale
based upon historical data with respect to similar product types
and geographical areas and allocated to closings along with
actual costs incurred based on a relative sales value approach.
To the extent the estimated costs to complete have significantly
changed, the Company will adjust cost of sales in the current
period for the impact on cost of sales of previously sold homes
and land to ensure a consistent margin of sales is maintained.
F-211
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Revenue is recognized for certain land sales on the
percentage-of-completion method when the land sale takes place
prior to all contracted work being completed. Pursuant to the
requirements of SFAS 66, if the seller has some continuing
involvement with the property and does not transfer
substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership, profit
shall be recognized by a method determined by the nature and
extent of the sellers continuing involvement. In the case
of land sales, this involvement typically consists of final
development activities. The Company recognizes revenue and
related costs as work progresses using the percentage of
completion method, which relies on estimates of total expected
costs to complete required work. Revenue is recognized in
proportion to the percentage of total costs incurred in relation
to estimated total costs at the time of sale. Actual revenues
and costs to complete construction in the future could differ
from current estimates. If the estimates of development costs
remaining to be completed and relative sales values are
significantly different from actual amounts, then the revenues,
related cumulative profits and costs of sales may be revised in
the period that estimates change.
Other revenues consist primarily of rental property income,
marketing revenues, irrigation service fees, and title and
mortgage revenue. Irrigation service connection fees are
deferred and recognized systematically over the life of the
irrigation plant. Irrigation usage fees are recognized when
billed as the service is performed. Rental property income
consists of rent revenue from long-term leases of commercial
property. The Company reviews all new leases in accordance with
SFAS No. 13 Accounting for Leases.
If the lease contains fixed escalations for rent, free-rent
periods or upfront incentives, rental revenue is recognized on a
straight-line basis over the life of the lease.
Effective January 1, 2006, Bluegreen adopted AICPA
Statement of Position
04-02,
Accounting for Real Estate Time-Sharing
Transactions
(SOP 04-02).
This Statement amends FASB Statement No. 67,
Accounting for Costs and Initial Rental Operations of
Real Estate Projects
(SFAS No. 67), to state that the
guidance for incidental operations and costs incurred to sell
real estate projects does not apply to real estate time-sharing
transactions. The accounting for those operations and costs is
subject to the guidance in
SOP 04-02.
Bluegreens adoption of
SOP 04-02
resulted in a one-time, non-cash, cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle charge of $4.5 million to Bluegreen
for the year ended December 31, 2006, and accordingly
reduced the earnings in Bluegreen recorded by us by
approximately $1.4 million for the same period.
Stock-based
Compensation
The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment
(SFAS No. 123R), as of January 1,
2006 and elected the modified-prospective transition method,
under which prior periods are not restated. Under the fair value
recognition provisions of this statement, stock-based
compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the
fair value of the award and is recognized as expense on a
straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is
the vesting period for all awards granted after January 1,
2006, and for the unvested portion of stock options that were
outstanding at January 1, 2006.
SFAS No. 123R requires a public entity to measure
compensation cost associated with awards of equity instruments
based on the grant-date fair value of the awards over the
requisite service period. SFAS No. 123R requires
public entities to initially measure compensation cost
associated with awards of liability instruments based on their
current fair value. The fair value of that award is to be
remeasured subsequently at each reporting date through the
settlement date. Changes in fair value during the requisite
service period will be recognized as compensation cost over that
period.
The Company currently uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model to determine the fair value of stock options. The fair
value of option awards on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model is determined by the stock
price and assumptions regarding expected stock price volatility
over the expected term
F-212
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
of the awards, risk-free interest rate, expected forfeiture rate
and expected dividends. If factors change and the Company uses
different assumptions for estimating stock-based compensation
expense in future periods or if the Company decides to use a
different valuation model, the amounts recorded in future
periods may differ significantly from the amounts recorded in
the current period and could affect net income and earnings per
share.
Income
Taxes
The Company records income taxes using the liability method of
accounting for deferred income taxes. Under this method,
deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the
expected future tax consequence of temporary differences between
the financial statement and income tax bases of our assets and
liabilities. The Company estimates income taxes in each of the
jurisdictions in which it operates. This process involves
estimating tax exposure together with assessing temporary
differences resulting from differing treatment of items, such as
deferred revenue, for tax and accounting purposes. These
differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which
are included within the consolidated statements of financial
condition. The recording of a net deferred tax asset assumes the
realization of such asset in the future. Otherwise, a valuation
allowance must be recorded to reduce this asset to its net
realizable value. The Company considers future pretax income and
ongoing prudent and feasible tax strategies in assessing the
need for such a valuation allowance. In the event that the
Company determines that it may not be able to realize all or
part of the net deferred tax asset in the future, a valuation
allowance for the deferred tax asset is charged against income
in the period such determination is made.
The Company and its subsidiaries file a consolidated Federal and
Florida income tax return. Separate state returns are filed by
subsidiaries that operate outside the state of Florida. Even
though Levitt and Sons and its subsidiaries have been
deconsolidated from Woodbridge for financial statement purposes,
they will continue to be included in the Companys Federal
and Florida consolidated tax returns until Levitt and Sons is
discharged from bankruptcy. As a result of the deconsolidation
of Levitt and Sons, all of Levitt and Sons net deferred
tax assets are no longer presented in the accompanying
consolidated statement of financial condition at
December 31, 2008 and 2007 but remain a part of Levitt and
Sons condensed consolidated financial statements at
December 31, 2008 and 2007.
The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation
No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes an interpretation of FASB No. 109
(FIN 48), on January 1, 2007.
FIN 48 provides guidance on recognition, measurement,
presentation and disclosure in financial statements of uncertain
tax positions that a company has taken or expects to take on a
tax return. FIN 48 substantially changes the accounting
policy for uncertain tax positions. As a result of the
implementation of FIN 48, the Company recognized a decrease
of $260,000 in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits,
which was accounted for as an increase to the January 1,
2007 balance of retained earnings. At December 31, 2008 and
2007, there were gross tax affected unrecognized tax benefits of
$2.4 million, of which $0.2 million, if recognized,
would affect the effective tax rate.
Loss
per Share
The Company has two classes of common stock. Class A common
stock is quoted on the Pink Sheets. At December 31, 2008
and 2007, 19,042,149 shares and 19,010,804 shares
(after retroactively adjusting this share amounts to reflect the
one-for-five reverse stock split effected during September
2008), respectively, were issued. The Company also has
Class B common stock which is held exclusively by BFC
Financial Corporation (BFC), the Companys
controlling shareholder.
While the Company has two classes of common stock outstanding,
the two-class method is not presented because the Companys
capital structure does not provide for different dividend rates
or other preferences, other than voting and conversion rights,
between the two classes. Basic loss per common share is computed
by
F-213
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding for the period. Diluted loss per share is
computed in the same manner as basic loss per share, but it also
gives consideration to (a) the dilutive effect of the
Companys stock options and restricted stock using the
treasury stock method and (b) the pro rata impact of
Bluegreens dilutive securities (stock options and
convertible securities) on the amount of Bluegreens
earnings that the Company recognizes.
All share and per share data presented herein for prior periods
have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the one-for-five
reverse stock split effected by the Company during September
2008.
Stock
Repurchases
The Company accounts for repurchases of its common stock using
the cost method with common stock in treasury classified in its
consolidated statement of financial condition as a reduction of
shareholders equity.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51
(SFAS No. 160). SFAS No. 160
requires that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary be
reported as equity and the amount of consolidated net income
specifically attributable to the noncontrolling interest be
identified in the consolidated financial statements. It also
calls for consistency in the manner of reporting changes in the
parents ownership interest and requires fair value
measurement of any noncontrolling equity investment retained in
a deconsolidation. SFAS No. 160 is effective for the
Companys fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009. The
adoption of SFAS No. 160 will not have a material
impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141
(revised 2007), Business Combinations
(SFAS No. 141R).
SFAS No. 141R broadens the guidance of
SFAS No. 141, extending its applicability to all
transactions and other events in which one entity obtains
control over one or more other businesses. It broadens the fair
value measurement and recognition of assets acquired,
liabilities assumed, and interests transferred as a result of
business combinations. SFAS No. 141R expands on
required disclosures to improve the statement users
abilities to evaluate the nature and financial effects of
business combinations. SFAS No. 141R is effective for
the Companys fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009.
The adoption of SFAS No. 141R could have a material
effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements
to the extent the Company consummates business combinations due
to the requirement to write-off transaction costs to the
consolidated statements of operations.
In April 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position (FSP)
FAS No. 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible
Assets (FSP
FAS No. 142-3).
FSP
FAS No. 142-3
amends paragraph 11(d) of FASB Statement No. 142
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS No. 142) which sets forth the
factors that should be considered in developing renewal or
extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a
recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142. FSP
FAS No. 142-3
intends to improve the consistency between the useful life of a
recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142 and the
period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of
the asset under SFAS No. 141R. FSP
FAS No. 142-3
is effective for the Companys fiscal year beginning
January 1, 2009 and must be applied prospectively to
intangible assets acquired after the effective date. The
adoption of FSP
FAS No. 142-3
will not have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP
FAS No. 157-3,
Determining Fair Value of a Financial Asset in a Market
That Is Not Active (FSP
FAS No. 157-3).
FSP
FAS No. 157-3
clarified the application of SFAS No. 157 in an
inactive market. It demonstrated how the fair value of a
financial asset is determined when the market for that financial
asset is inactive. FSP
FAS No. 157-3
was effective upon issuance, including
F-214
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
prior periods for which financial statements had not been
issued. The implementation of this standard did not have a
material impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
In November 2008, the FASB issued
EITF 08-6,
Equity Method Accounting Considerations
(EITF 08-6).
EITF 08-6
clarifies the application of equity method accounting under
Accounting Principles Board 18, The Equity Method of
Accounting for Investments in Common Stock.
Specifically, it requires companies to initially record equity
method investments based on the cost accumulation model,
precludes separate other-than-temporary impairment tests on an
equity method investees indefinite-lived assets from the
investees test, requires companies to account for an
investees issuance of shares as if the equity method
investor had sold a proportionate share of its investment, and
requires that an equity method investor continues to apply the
guidance in paragraph 19(l) of APB 18 upon a change in the
investors accounting from the equity method to the cost
method.
EITF 08-6
is effective prospectively for fiscal years beginning on or
after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those
fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of
EITF 08-6.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP
FAS No. 140-4
and
FIN 46R-8
Disclosures by Public Entities (Enterprises) about
Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests in Variable Interest
Entities which requires enhanced disclosure related to
VIEs in accordance with SFAS 140 Accounting for
Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments
of Liabilities and FASB Interpretation No. 46
(revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities. These disclosures include
significant judgments and assumptions, restrictions on asset,
risk and the effects on financial position, financial
performance and cash flows. The enhanced disclosures are
effective for the first reporting period that ends after
December 15, 2008. The implementation of this standard will
not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
Pizza Fusion is a restaurant franchise operating in a niche
market within the quick service and organic food industries.
Founded in 2006, Pizza Fusion was operating 16 locations in
Florida and California through December 31, 2008 and
entered into franchise agreements to open an additional 14
stores over 2009.
On September 18, 2008, the Company, indirectly through its
wholly-owned subsidiary, Woodbridge Equity Fund II LP,
purchased for an aggregate of $3.0 million,
2,608,696 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred
Stock of Pizza Fusion, together with warrants to purchase up to
1,500,000 additional shares of Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock of Pizza Fusion at an exercise price of $1.44
per share. The Company also has options, exercisable on or prior
to September 18, 2009, to purchase up to 521,740 additional
shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock of Pizza
Fusion at a price of $1.15 per share and, upon exercise of such
options, will receive warrants to purchase up to 300,000
additional shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
of Pizza Fusion at an exercise price of $1.44 per share. The
warrants have a term of 10 years, subject to earlier
expiration in certain circumstances.
The Company evaluated its investment in Pizza Fusion under
FIN No. 46(R) and determined that Pizza Fusion is a
VIE. Pizza Fusion is in its infancy stages and does not have
enough equity investment and will likely require additional
financial support for its normal operations and further
expansion of its franchise operations. Furthermore, the
Companys investment on a fully diluted basis will result
in the Company having a significant interest in Pizza Fusion and
therefore will bear the majority of the variability of the risks
and rewards of Pizza Fusion. Additionally, as shareholder of the
Series B Preferred Stock, the Company has control over the
Board of Directors of Pizza Fusion. Based upon these factors,
the Company concluded that it is the primary beneficiary and as
such, applied purchase accounting and has consolidated the
assets and liabilities of Pizza Fusion in accordance with
SFAS No. 141. Apart from the investment of
$3.0 million, the Company did not provide any additional
financial support to Pizza Fusion. There are no restrictions on
the
F-215
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
assets currently held by Pizza Fusion and their liabilities are
primarily related to franchise deposits, which are not
refundable. The financial statements of Pizza Fusion at
December 31, 2008 were not material.
The following table summarizes the fair value of the assets and
liabilities associated with the consolidation of Pizza Fusion as
of September 18, 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid and other current assets
|
|
$
|
148
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
117
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
4,324
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of assets
|
|
|
4,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities
|
|
|
442
|
|
Deposits and deferred fees
|
|
|
1,127
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash consideration
|
|
$
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recorded $4.4 million in other intangibles
assets. The intangible assets consist primarily of the value of
franchise agreements executed by the Company for approximately
14 stores to be open through 2009. These intangible assets will
be amortized over the length of the franchise agreements which
is approximately 10 years.
Basic loss per common share is computed by dividing loss
attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted loss
per common share is computed in the same manner as basic loss
per common share, taking into consideration (a) the
dilutive effect of the Companys stock options and
restricted stock using the treasury stock method and
(b) the pro rata impact of Bluegreens dilutive
securities (stock options and convertible securities) on the
amount of Bluegreens earnings recognized by the Company.
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
common stock equivalents related to the Companys stock
options and unvested restricted stock amounted to
3,258 shares, 2,306 shares and 1,123 shares,
respectively, and were not considered in computing diluted loss
per common share because their effect would have been
antidilutive since the Company recorded a net loss for those
years. In addition, for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006, 336,159, 372,564 and 379,772 shares of
common stock equivalents, respectively, at various prices were
not included in the computation of diluted loss per common share
because the exercise prices were greater than the average market
price of the common shares and, therefore, their effect would be
antidilutive.
F-216
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table presents the computation of basic and
diluted loss per common share (in thousands, except for per
share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss basic
|
|
$
|
(140,331
|
)
|
|
|
(234,620
|
)
|
|
|
(9,164
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss basic
|
|
$
|
(140,331
|
)
|
|
|
(234,620
|
)
|
|
|
(9,164
|
)
|
Pro rata share of the net effect of Bluegreen dilutive securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss diluted
|
|
$
|
(140,331
|
)
|
|
|
(234,662
|
)
|
|
|
(9,264
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic average shares outstanding
|
|
|
19,088
|
|
|
|
7,821
|
|
|
|
3,967
|
|
Bonus adjustment factor from registration rights offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic average shares outstanding
|
|
|
19,088
|
|
|
|
7,821
|
|
|
|
4,045
|
|
Net effect of stock options assumed to be exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
19,088
|
|
|
|
7,821
|
|
|
|
4,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(7.35
|
)
|
|
|
(30.00
|
)
|
|
|
(2.27
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(7.35
|
)
|
|
|
(30.00
|
)
|
|
|
(2.29
|
)
|
Cash
dividends
Cash dividends declared by the Companys Board of Directors
for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 are
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classes of
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
Declaration Date
|
|
Record Date
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
per Share
|
|
Payment Date
|
|
January 24, 2006
|
|
February 8, 2006
|
|
Class A, Class B
|
|
$0.10
|
|
February 15, 2006
|
April 26, 2006
|
|
May 8, 2006
|
|
Class A, Class B
|
|
$0.10
|
|
May 15, 2006
|
August 1, 2006
|
|
August 11, 2006
|
|
Class A, Class B
|
|
$0.10
|
|
August 18, 2006
|
October 23, 2006
|
|
November 10, 2006
|
|
Class A, Class B
|
|
$0.10
|
|
November 17, 2006
|
January 22, 2007
|
|
February 9, 2007
|
|
Class A, Class B
|
|
$0.10
|
|
February 16, 2007
|
The Company did not declare any cash dividends during the year
ended December 31, 2008. The Company has not adopted a
policy of regular dividend payments. The payment of dividends in
the future is subject to approval by the Board of Directors and
will depend upon, among other factors, the Companys
results of operations and financial condition. The Company does
not expect to pay dividends to shareholders for the foreseeable
future.
Reverse
stock split
On September 26, 2008, the Company effected a one-for-five
reverse stock split. As a result of the reverse stock split,
each five shares of the Companys Class A Common Stock
outstanding at the time of the reverse
F-217
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
stock split automatically converted into one share of
Class A Common Stock and each five shares of the
Companys Class B Common Stock outstanding at the time
of the reverse stock split automatically converted into one
share of Class B Common Stock. As a result, the number of
outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock decreased from
95,197,445 to 19,042,149, and the number of outstanding shares
of Class B Common Stock decreased from 1,219,031 to
243,807. The number of authorized shares of the Companys
Class A and Class B Common Stock as well as the number
of shares of Class A Common Stock available for issuance
under the Companys equity compensation plans and the
number of shares of Class A Common Stock underlying stock
options and other exercisable or convertible instruments were
also ratably decreased in connection with the reverse split. All
share and per share data presented herein for prior periods have
been retroactively adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split.
Stock
Repurchases
In November 2008, the Companys Board of Directors approved
a stock repurchase program which authorized Woodbridge to
repurchase up to 5 million shares of its Class A
Common Stock from time to time on the open market or in private
transactions. There can be no assurance that Woodbridge will
repurchase all of the shares authorized for repurchase under the
program, and the actual number of shares repurchased will depend
on a number of factors, including levels of cash generated from
operations, cash requirements for acquisitions and investment
opportunities, repayment of debt, current stock price, and other
factors. The stock repurchase program does not have an
expiration date and may be modified or discontinued at any time.
In the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company repurchased
2,385,624 shares at a cost of $1.4 million which have
been recorded as treasury stock in the Statements of Financial
Condition. These treasury stock shares repurchased by the
Company were canceled and retired on February 25, 2009
subsequent to December 31, 2008. At December 31, 2008,
2,614,376 shares remained available for repurchase under
the stock repurchase program.
Rights
Offering
On August 29, 2007, Woodbridge distributed to each holder
of record of its Class A Common Stock and Class B
Common Stock as of August 27, 2007 5.0414 subscription
rights for each share of such stock owned on that date (the
Rights Offering). Each right entitled the holder to
purchase one share of Class A Common Stock at $2.00 per
share, and, in the aggregate, the Company issued rights to
purchase 100 million shares of Class A Common Stock.
The Rights Offering was priced at $2.00 per share, commenced on
August 29, 2007 and was completed on October 1, 2007.
Woodbridge received $152.8 million of proceeds in
connection with the exercise of rights by its shareholders. In
connection with the offering, Woodbridge issued an aggregate of
76,424,066 shares (15,284,814 shares after adjusting
for the reverse stock split) of Class A Common Stock on
October 1, 2007. The stock price on the October 1,
2007 closing date was $2.05 per share. As a result, there is a
bonus element adjustment of 1.97% for all shareholders of record
on August 29, 2007 and accordingly the number of weighted
average shares of Class A Common Stock outstanding for
basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share was retroactively
increased by 1.97% for all periods presented in these
consolidated financial statements.
|
|
6.
|
Stock
Based Compensation
|
On May 11, 2004, the Companys shareholders approved
the 2003 Levitt Corporation Stock Incentive Plan. In March 2006,
subject to shareholder approval, the Board of Directors of the
Company approved the amendment and restatement of the
Companys 2003 Stock Incentive Plan to increase the maximum
number of shares of the Companys Class A common
stock, $0.01 par value, that may be issued for restricted
stock awards and upon the exercise of options under the plan
from 1,500,000 to 3,000,000 shares. The Companys
shareholders approved the Amended and Restated 2003 Stock
Incentive Plan (Incentive Plan) on May 16,
2006. In connection with the reverse stock split, the number of
shares of Class A Common Stock available for issuance under
the Incentive Plan and the number of shares underlying awards
previously granted under the
F-218
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Incentive Plan were each ratably decreased and the exercise
prices of stock options previously granted under the Incentive
Plan were ratably increased. The share and per share data
presented below and elsewhere in this document have been
adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split.
The maximum term of options granted under the Incentive Plan is
10 years. The vesting period for each grant is established
by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The
vesting period for employees is generally five years utilizing
cliff vesting. All options granted to directors vest
immediately. Option awards issued to date become exercisable
based solely on fulfilling a service condition. Since the
inception of the Incentive Plan there have been no expired stock
options.
In accordance with SFAS No. 123R, the Company
estimates the grant-date fair value of its stock options using
the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which takes into account
assumptions regarding the dividend yield, the risk-free interest
rate, the expected stock-price volatility and the expected term
of the stock options. The expected life of stock option awards
granted is based upon the simplified method for
plain vanilla options, as defined by
SAB No. 110. The fair value of the Companys
stock option awards, which are primarily subject to five year
cliff vesting, is expensed over the vesting life of the stock
options using the straight-line method.
The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of
the grant using the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
65.47%
|
|
40.05% 52.59%
|
|
37.37% 39.80%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
0.00%
|
|
0.00% 0.83%
|
|
0.39% 0.61%
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
4.16%
|
|
4.58% 5.14%
|
|
4.57% 5.06%
|
Expected life
|
|
5 years
|
|
5 7.5 years
|
|
5 7.5 years
|
Forfeiture rate executives
|
|
5%
|
|
5%
|
|
5%
|
Forfeiture rate non-executives
|
|
|
|
10%
|
|
10%
|
Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the
Companys stock. Due to the short period of time the
Company has been publicly traded, the historical volatilities of
similar publicly traded entities are reviewed to validate the
Companys expected volatility assumption. The expected
dividend yield is based on an expected quarterly dividend.
Historically, forfeiture rates were estimated based on
historical employee turnover rates. In 2007, there were
substantial forfeitures as a result of the reductions in force
related to the bankruptcy of Levitt and Sons. See note 24
for further explanation. As a result, the Company adjusted their
stock compensation to reflect actual forfeitures. In accordance
with SFAS No. 123R, companies are required to adjust
forfeiture estimates for all awards with performance and service
conditions through the vesting date so that compensation cost is
recognized only for awards that vest. During the year ended
December 31, 2008, there were substantial pre-vesting
forfeitures as a result of the reductions in force related to
the Companys restructurings and the bankruptcy of Levitt
and Sons. In accordance with SFAS No. 123R,
pre-vesting forfeitures result in a reversal of compensation
cost whereas a post-vesting cancellation would not.
Non-cash stock compensation expense for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 related to unvested stock
options amounted to $840,000, $1.9 million and
$3.1 million, respectively, with an expected or estimated
income tax benefit of $548,000, $578,000 and $849,000,
respectively. Non-cash stock compensation expense for the years
ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 include
$2.1 million and $3.5 million, respectively, of
amortization of stock option compensation offset by
$1.3 million and $1.6 million, respectively, of a
reversal of stock compensation previously expensed related to
forfeited options. Additionally, during 2007, the Company
recorded $231,000 of tax benefit related to employees exercising
stock options to acquire shares of BankAtlantic Bancorp,
Inc.s (Bancorp) Class A common stock
which was granted to the Companys employees before the
Company was spun off from Bancorp.
F-219
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
At December 31, 2008, the Company had approximately
$2.4 million of unrecognized stock compensation expense
related to outstanding stock option awards which is expected to
be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.3 years.
Stock option activity under the Incentive Plan for the years
ended December 31, 2007 and 2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Thousands)
|
|
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
378,521
|
|
|
$
|
103.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
150,489
|
|
|
|
45.92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
156,478
|
|
|
|
88.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
372,532
|
|
|
$
|
86.66
|
|
|
|
8.00 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
36,398
|
|
|
|
6.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
90,459
|
|
|
|
81.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
318,471
|
|
|
$
|
78.89
|
|
|
|
7.19 years
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
69,822
|
|
|
$
|
40.20
|
|
|
|
8.36 years
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options available for equity compensation grants at
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
281,529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of the Companys non-vested stock option activity
for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008 was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Term
|
|
|
Intrinsic Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
358,660
|
|
|
$
|
103.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Grants
|
|
|
150,489
|
|
|
|
45.92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
13,563
|
|
|
|
45.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
156,478
|
|
|
|
88.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
339,108
|
|
|
|
87.64
|
|
|
|
7.98 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grants
|
|
|
36,398
|
|
|
|
6.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
36,398
|
|
|
|
6.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
90,459
|
|
|
|
81.85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
248,649
|
|
|
$
|
89.75
|
|
|
|
6.86 years
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-220
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table summarizes information about stock options
outstanding as of December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
Range of Exercise Price
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
|
Contractual Life
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
$ 0.00 - $ 16.07
|
|
|
36,398
|
|
|
|
9.46
|
|
|
|
36,398
|
|
|
$
|
6.70
|
|
$ 32.13 - $ 48.20
|
|
|
78,935
|
|
|
|
8.47
|
|
|
|
13,563
|
|
|
$
|
45.80
|
|
$ 64.26 - $ 80.32
|
|
|
59,206
|
|
|
|
7.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$ 80.33 - $ 96.39
|
|
|
8,825
|
|
|
|
7.51
|
|
|
|
8,825
|
|
|
$
|
80.45
|
|
$ 96.40 - $112.45
|
|
|
83,711
|
|
|
|
5.09
|
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
$
|
100.75
|
|
$112.46 - $128.52
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
5.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
$144.59 - $160.65
|
|
|
51,246
|
|
|
|
6.56
|
|
|
|
2,036
|
|
|
$
|
159.75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
318,471
|
|
|
|
7.19
|
|
|
|
69,822
|
|
|
$
|
40.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company also grants shares of restricted Class A Common
Stock, valued based on the market price of such stock on the
date of grant. Restricted stock is issued primarily to the
Companys directors and typically vests in equal monthly
installments over a one-year period. Compensation expense
arising from restricted stock grants is recognized using the
straight-line method over the vesting period. Unearned
compensation for restricted stock is a component of additional
paid-in capital in shareholders equity in the consolidated
statements of financial condition. During the year ended
December 31, 2007, the Company granted 1,529 restricted
shares of Class A common stock to non-employee directors
under the Incentive Plan, having a market price on the date of
grant of $45.80 per share. During the year ended
December 31, 2008, the Company granted 31,345 restricted
shares of Class A common stock to non-employee directors
under the Incentive Plan, having a market price on the date of
grant of $6.70 per share. The restricted stock vests monthly
over a 12 month period. Non-cash stock compensation expense
for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
related to restricted stock awards amounted to $152,000, $81,000
and $150,000, respectively.
Notes receivable, which is included in other assets, was
approximately $4.0 million at each of December 31,
2008 and 2007 and represents purchase money notes due from third
parties resulting from various land sales at Core Communities.
As of December 31, 2008, there were three notes outstanding
with a weighted average interest rate of 5.15% and interest is
payable quarterly. A balloon principal payment on one note of
approximately $3.9 million is due in full in December 2009.
The remaining two notes of approximately $63,000 have principal
payment terms due at various dates through 2012.
|
|
8.
|
Inventory
of Real Estate
|
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, inventory of real estate is
summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Land and land development costs
|
|
$
|
202,456
|
|
|
|
196,577
|
|
Construction cost
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
1,062
|
|
Capitalized interest
|
|
|
37,764
|
|
|
|
29,012
|
|
Other costs
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
241,318
|
|
|
|
227,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-221
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As of December 31, 2008, inventory of real estate included
inventory related to the operations of the Land Division and
Carolina Oak.
As a result of the various impairment analyses conducted
throughout 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company recorded impairment
charges of approximately $3.5 million, $226.9 million
and $36.8 million, respectively, in cost of sales of real
estate in the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company made the decision
to suspend the development activities of Carolina Oak and is
re-evaluating its options with respect to this entity due to the
continued deterioration of the real estate markets in 2008. As a
result, the Company re-evaluated its impairment analyses in
accordance with SFAS No. 144 and determined that an
impairment charge of $3.5 million was required to write the
inventory down to its fair value at December 31, 2008. This
impairment charge was recorded in the Other Operations segment.
The impairment charges recorded in 2007 and 2006 related to
Levitt and Sons inventory of real estate and were recorded
in the Primary and Tennessee Homebuilding segments. In addition,
included in total impairment charges there was approximately
$2.4 million in 2008 and $9.3 million in 2007 of
impairment charges relating to capitalized interest in the Other
Operations segment in connection with Carolina Oak
(2008) and the projects that Levitt and Sons ceased
developing (2007), respectively.
|
|
9.
|
Property
and Equipment
|
Property and equipment at December 31, 2008 and 2007 is
summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Depreciable Life
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Real estate investments
|
|
30-39 years
|
|
$
|
97,113
|
|
|
|
101,185
|
|
Water and irrigation facilities
|
|
35-50 years
|
|
|
12,346
|
|
|
|
11,515
|
|
Furniture and fixtures and equipment
|
|
3-7 years
|
|
|
12,259
|
|
|
|
12,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,718
|
|
|
|
124,831
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
(12,241
|
)
|
|
|
(6,588
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
|
$
|
109,477
|
|
|
|
118,243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006 was $5.7 million, $3.1 million and
$2.6 million, respectively, and is included in selling,
general and administrative expenses in the accompanying
consolidated statements of operations.
The Company received proceeds from the sale of property and
equipment for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2006 of
approximately $5.6 million and $1.9 million,
respectively. As a result of these sales, the Company realized a
gain on sale of property and equipment for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2006 of approximately
$2.5 million and $1.9 million, respectively. Sales of
property and equipment for the year ended December 31, 2007
were not material.
In 2007, the Company performed a review of its fixed assets and
determined that certain leasehold improvements were no longer
appropriately valued as we vacated the leased space associated
with those improvements. Therefore, the leasehold improvements
in the amount of $564,000 related to this vacated space were
written off in the year ended December 31, 2007.
Bluegreen
Corporation
At December 31, 2008, the Company owned approximately
9.5 million shares of common stock of Bluegreen,
representing approximately 31% of Bluegreens outstanding
common stock. The Company accounts for its investment in
Bluegreen under the equity method of accounting. The cost of the
Bluegreen investment
F-222
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
is adjusted to recognize the Companys interest in
Bluegreens earnings or losses. The difference between
a) the Companys ownership percentage in Bluegreen
multiplied by its earnings and b) the amount of the
Companys equity in earnings of Bluegreen as reflected in
the Companys financial statements relates to the
amortization or accretion of purchase accounting adjustments
made at the time of the acquisition of Bluegreens common
stock, to adjustments made to the Companys investment
balance related to equity transactions recorded by Bluegreen
that effect the Companys ownership and to the cumulative
adjustment discussed below.
Effective January 1, 2006, Bluegreen adopted
SOP 04-02.
This Statement amends FAS No. 67 to state that the
guidance for (a) incidental operations and (b) costs
incurred to sell real estate projects does not apply to real
estate time-sharing transactions. The accounting for those
operations and costs is subject to the guidance in
SOP 04-02.
Bluegreens adoption of
SOP 04-02
resulted in a one-time, non-cash, cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle charge of $4.5 million to Bluegreen
for the year ended December 31, 2006, and accordingly
reduced the earnings in Bluegreen recorded by the Company by
approximately $1.4 million for the same period.
During 2008, the Company began evaluating its investment in
Bluegreen for other-than-temporary impairment in accordance with
FSP
FAS 115-1/FAS 124-1,
APB No. 18 and SAB No. 59 as the fair value of
the Bluegreen stock had fallen below the carrying value of the
Companys investment in Bluegreen of approximately $12 per
share. The Company analyzed various quantitative and qualitative
factors including the Companys intent and ability to hold
the investment, the severity and duration of the impairment and
the prospects for the improvement of fair value. On
July 21, 2008, Bluegreens Board of Directors entered
into a non-binding letter of intent for the sale of
Bluegreens outstanding common stock for $15 per share to a
third party, with a due diligence and exclusivity period through
September 15, 2008. This due diligence and exclusivity
period was subsequently extended through November 15, 2008.
In October 2008, Bluegreen disclosed that the third party buyer
had been unable to obtain the financing necessary to execute a
sale transaction, therefore, no assurances could be provided
that a sale would be completed. As of December 31, 2008,
the exclusivity period had expired and Bluegreen was not able to
consummate a sale.
At September 30, 2008, the Companys investment in
Bluegreen was $119.4 million compared to the
$65.8 million trading value (calculated based upon the
$6.91 closing price of Bluegreens common stock on the New
York Stock Exchange on September 30, 2008). The Company
determined that its investment in Bluegreen was
other-than-temporarily impaired due to the severity of the
decline in the fair value of the investment, the probability
that a sale could not be executed by Bluegreen, and due to the
deterioration of the debt and equity markets in the third
quarter of 2008. Therefore, the Company recorded an impairment
charge of $53.6 million, adjusting the carrying value of
its investment in Bluegreen to $65.8 million at
September 30, 2008. Additionally, after further evaluation
of the Companys investment in Bluegreen as of
December 31, 2008, based on, among other things, the
continued decline of Bluegreens common stock price and the
continued deterioration of the equity markets, the Company
determined that an additional impairment of the investment in
Bluegreen was appropriate. Accordingly, the Company recorded a
$40.8 million impairment charge (calculated based upon the
$3.13 closing price of Bluegreens common stock on the New
York Stock Exchange on December 31, 2008) and adjusted
the carrying value of its investment in Bluegreen to
$29.8 million. On March 13, 2009, the closing price of
Bluegreens common stock was $1.12 per share.
As a result of the impairment charges taken, a basis
difference was created between the Companys investment in
Bluegreen and the underlying assets and liabilities carried on
the books of Bluegreen. Therefore, earnings from Bluegreen will
be adjusted each period to reflect the amortization of this
basis difference. As such, the Company established an allocation
methodology by which the Company allocated the impairment loss
to the relative fair value of Bluegreens underlying assets
based upon the position that the impairment loss was a
reflection of the perceived value of these underlying assets.
The appropriate amortization will be calculated based on the
useful lives of the underlying assets and other relevant data
associated with each asset
F-223
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
category. As such, amortization of $9.2 million was
recorded into the Companys pro rata share of
Bluegreens net loss for the period ended December 31,
2008.
The following table shows the reconciliation of the
Companys pro rata share of Bluegreens net loss to
the Companys total earnings from Bluegreen recorded in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Prorata share of Bluegreens net loss
|
|
$
|
(154
|
)
|
Amortization of basis difference
|
|
|
9,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earnings from Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
$
|
8,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table shows the reconciliation of the
Companys prorata share of its net investment in Bluegreen
and its investment in Bluegreen after impairment charges (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Prorata share of investment in Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
$
|
115,065
|
|
Amortization of basis difference
|
|
|
9,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Impairment of investment in Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
|
(94,426
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
$
|
29,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bluegreens condensed consolidated financial statements are
presented below (in thousands):
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,193,507
|
|
|
|
1,039,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
781,522
|
|
|
|
632,047
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
29,518
|
|
|
|
22,423
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
382,467
|
|
|
|
385,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,193,507
|
|
|
|
1,039,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-224
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues and other income
|
|
$
|
602,043
|
|
|
|
691,494
|
|
|
|
671,509
|
|
Cost and other expenses
|
|
|
594,698
|
|
|
|
632,280
|
|
|
|
609,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest and provision for income taxes
|
|
|
7,345
|
|
|
|
59,214
|
|
|
|
62,491
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
7,095
|
|
|
|
7,721
|
|
|
|
7,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
51,493
|
|
|
|
55,172
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(766
|
)
|
|
|
(19,567
|
)
|
|
|
(20,861
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle
|
|
|
(516
|
)
|
|
|
31,926
|
|
|
|
34,311
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,678
|
)
|
Minority interest in cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(516
|
)
|
|
|
31,926
|
|
|
|
29,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the fourth quarter of 2008, Bluegreen recorded
$15.6 million in restructuring charges as part of its
strategic initiative to conserve cash by reducing overhead and
capital spending, among other things. In addition, Bluegreen
recorded an $8.5 million impairment charge related to its
goodwill.
Office
Depot Investment
During March 2008, the Company purchased 3,000,200 shares
of Office Depot common stock, which represented approximately
one percent of Office Depots outstanding common stock, at
an average price of $11.33 per share for an aggregate purchase
price of approximately $34.0 million.
During June 2008, the Company sold 1,565,200 shares of
Office Depot common stock at an average price of $12.08 per
share for an aggregate sales price of approximately
$18.9 million. The Company realized a gain of approximately
$1.2 million as a result of the sale.
During December 2008, the Company performed an impairment
analysis of its investment in Office Depot common stock. The
Company concluded that there was an other-than-temporary
impairment associated with its investment in Office Depot based
on the severity of the decline of the fair value of its
investment, the length of time the stock price had been below
the carrying value of the Companys investment, the
continued decline in the overall economy and credit markets, and
the unpredictability of the recovery of the Office Depot stock
price. Accordingly, the Company recorded an other-than-temporary
impairment charge of approximately $12.0 million
representing the difference of the average cost of $11.33 per
share and the fair value of $2.98 per share as of
December 31, 2008 multiplied by the number of shares of
Office Depot common stock owned by the Company at that date. As
a result of the impairment charge, the Companys investment
in Office Depot was $4.3 million at December 31, 2008.
On March 13, 2009, the closing price of Office Depots
common stock on the New York Stock Exchange was 1.10 per share.
F-225
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Data with respect to this investment is shown in the table below
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Total cost
|
|
$
|
33,978
|
|
Sale of portion of Office Depot common stock
|
|
|
(17,726
|
)
|
Other-than-temporary impairment
|
|
|
(11,974
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value
|
|
$
|
4,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below shows the amount of gains and
other-than-temporary loss reclassified out of other
comprehensive loss into net loss for the period (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Unrealized holding loss arising during the period
|
|
$
|
(10,796
|
)
|
Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net loss
|
|
|
(1,178
|
)
|
Less: Reclassification adjustment for other-than-temporary loss
|
|
|
11,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized holding gain (loss)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company valued Office Depots common stock using a
market approach valuation technique and Level 1 valuation
inputs under SFAS No. 157. The Company uses quoted
market prices to value equity securities. The fair value of the
Office Depot common stock in the Companys consolidated
statements of financial condition at December 31, 2008 was
calculated based upon the $2.98 closing price of Office
Depots common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on
December 31, 2008. On March 13, 2009, the closing
price of Office Depot common stock was $1.10 per share. The
Company will continue to monitor this investment to determine
whether any further other-than-temporary impairment associated
with this investment may be required in future periods.
Unconsolidated
Trusts
During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company determined that
the fair value of its investment in unconsolidated trusts, which
consists of its common interests in subordinated trust debt
securities of approximately $406,000, was less than the carrying
value of this investment of $2.6 million primarily due to
the deterioration of the market for these instruments and
overall economic conditions. The fair value was assessed using
Level 3 inputs as defined by FAS 157, whereby the
Companys valuation technique was to measure the fair value
based upon the current rates and spreads that were used to value
the underlying subordinated trust debt securities which is
primarily based upon similarly rated corporate bonds. The
Company evaluated its investment for other-than-temporary
impairment due to the significance of the carrying value in
excess of fair value, and the lack of evidence to support the
recoverability of the carrying value in the near future.
Therefore, based upon the criteria for other-than-temporary
impairment as defined in FSP
FAS 115-1/FAS 124-1,
the Company determined that an impairment charge of
approximately $2.1 million was required at
December 31, 2008.
F-226
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
11.
|
Notes and
Mortgage Notes Payable and Junior Subordinated
Debentures
|
Notes and mortgages payable at December 31, 2008 and 2007
are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
Maturity Date
|
|
Land acquisition and development mortgage notes payable(a)(f)
|
|
$
|
140,034
|
|
|
|
136,266
|
|
|
From LIBOR + 2.50% to
Fixed 6.88%
|
|
Range from June
2011 to October 2019
|
Commercial development mortgage notes payable(b)(f)
|
|
|
71,905
|
|
|
|
76,278
|
|
|
From LIBOR + 1.70%
to Prime
|
|
Range from June
2009 to July 2010
|
Borrowing base facility(c)
|
|
|
37,458
|
|
|
|
39,674
|
|
|
Prime
|
|
March 2011
|
Other mortgage notes payable(d)
|
|
|
11,831
|
|
|
|
12,027
|
|
|
Fixed 5.47%
|
|
April 2015
|
Development bonds
|
|
|
3,291
|
|
|
|
3,350
|
|
|
Fixed from 6.00% to 6.13%
|
|
2035
|
Other borrowings
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
1,143
|
|
|
Fixed from 2.44% to 9.15%
|
|
Range from July 2009 to June 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Notes and Mortgage Notes Payable(e)
|
|
$
|
264,900
|
|
|
|
268,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Core Communities land acquisition and development mortgage
notes payable are collateralized by inventory of real estate
with approximate net carrying values aggregating
$174.5 million and $159.2 million as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Core has a credit
agreement with a financial institution which provides for
borrowing of up to $88.9 million. This facility matures in
June 2011 and has a Loan to Value limitation of 55%. As of
December 31, 2008, $86.9 million was outstanding, with
no current availability for borrowing based on available
collateral. Core has a credit agreement with a financial
institution which provides for borrowings of up to
$33.0 million. This facility matures in October 2019. As of
December 31, 2008, $23.2 million is outstanding with
no current availability for borrowing based on available
collateral. Core has a credit agreement with a financial
institution which provides for borrowing of up to
$5.0 million. This facility matures in October 2019. As of
December 31, 2008, $4.9 million was outstanding, with
no current availability for borrowing based on available
collateral. These notes accrue interest, payable monthly, at
fixed and varying rates and are tied to various indices as noted
above. For certain notes, principal payments are required
monthly or quarterly as the note dictates. Core had a
$50.0 million revolving credit facility with a Loan to
Value limitation of 75% for construction financing for the
development of the Tradition Hilton Head master-planned
community which was subsequently modified in 2008 to
$25.0 million. This agreement had a provision that required
additional principal payments, known as curtailment payments, in
the event that actual sales were below the contractual
requirements. A curtailment payment of $14.9 million was
paid in January 2008. On June 27, 2008, Core modified this
loan agreement, terminating the revolving feature of the loan
and reducing an approximately $19 million curtailment
payment due in June 2008 to $17.0 million,
$5.0 million of which was paid in June 2008. The loan was
further modified in December 2008, reducing the loan to
$25 million, eliminating the curtailment requirements,
extending the loan to February 2012 and increasing the rate to
Prime Rate plus 1%, with a floor of 5.00%, and the establishment
of an interest reserve classified as restricted cash. As of
December 31, 2008, $25.0 million was outstanding, with
no current availability for borrowing based on available
collateral. The loan accrues interest at the banks Prime
Rate plus 1.0% (subject to a floor of 5%) and interest is
payable monthly. The facility is due and payable on
February 28, 2012. |
F-227
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Core Communities has three credit agreements with a financial
institution which provides for borrowing of up to
$80.3 million. As of December 31, 2008,
$71.9 million was outstanding, with no current availability
for borrowing based on available collateral. These credit
agreements had debt service coverage ratios of up to 1.15. Core
has a credit agreement with a financial institution which
provides for borrowing of up to $64.3 million. This
facility matures in June 2009, has two one-year extension
options at the Companys sole discretion and, as of
December 31, 2008, $58.3 million was outstanding, with
no current availability for borrowing based on available
collateral. In July 2008, one of these credit agreements was
refinanced by $9.1 million of construction loans. The new
loan has an interest rate of
30-day LIBOR
plus 210 basis points or Prime Rate, a maturity date of
July 2010 with a one year extension subject to certain
conditions, and has an outstanding balance of $8.9 million
at December 31, 2008. In 2008, Core extended the maturity
of another $6.9 million credit agreement from June 2008 to
June 2010, which had an outstanding balance of $4.7 million
at December 31, 2008. These notes accrue interest at
varying rates tied to various indices as noted above and
interest is payable monthly. For certain notes, principal
payments are required monthly as the note dictates. Core
Communities commercial development mortgage notes payable
are collateralized by commercial property with approximate net
carrying values aggregating $96.1 million and
$103.2 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. |
|
(c) |
|
Levitt and Sons had entered into a $100.0 million revolving
working capital, land acquisition, development and residential
construction borrowing base facility agreement with a 75% Loan
to Value limitation and borrowed $30.2 million under the
facility (the Carolina Oak Loan). The proceeds were
used to finance the inter-company purchase of a 150 acre
parcel in Tradition Hilton Head from Core Communities and to
refinance a $15.0 million line of credit. In October 2007,
in connection with Woodbridges acquisition from Levitt and
Sons of the membership interests in Carolina Oak, Woodbridge
became the obligor for the entire Carolina Oak Loan outstanding
balance at the time of acquisition of $34.1 million. The
Carolina Oak Loan was modified in connection with the
acquisition and had an outstanding balance of $37.5 million
at December 31, 2008. The Carolina Oak Loan is
collateralized by a first mortgage on the 150 acre parcel
in Tradition, Hilton Head with approximate net carrying values
aggregating $27.6 million and $38.5 million as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Carolina Oak
Loan is due and payable on March 21, 2011 and may be
extended at the lenders sole discretion on the anniversary
date of the facility. Interest accrues at the Prime Rate and is
payable monthly. At December 31, 2008, there was no
immediate availability to draw on this facility based on
available collateral. |
|
(d) |
|
Woodbridge entered into a mortgage note payable agreement with a
financial institution in March 2005 to repay the bridge loan
used to temporarily fund the Companys purchase of an
office building in Fort Lauderdale. This note payable is
collateralized by the office building with approximate net
carrying values aggregating $13.7 million and
$14.2 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. The note payable contains a balloon payment
provision of approximately $10.4 million at the maturity
date in April 2015. Principal and interest are payable monthly. |
|
(e) |
|
At December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Prime Rate as
reported by the Wall Street Journal was 3.25%, 7.25% and 8.25%,
respectively, and the three-month LIBOR Rate was 1.83%, 4.98%
and 5.36%, respectively. |
|
(f) |
|
Core Communities credit facilities generally require it to
maintain a minimum net worth and minimum working capital levels,
the most restrictive of which is a minimum net worth of
$75 million and minimum liquidity of $7.5 million. |
F-228
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The Companys unsecured junior subordinated debentures at
December 31, 2008 and 2007 are described in the following
table (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Optional
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption
|
|
|
Issue Date
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
Maturity Date
|
|
Date
|
|
Levitt Capital Trust I
|
|
|
March 2005
|
|
|
$
|
23,196
|
|
|
|
23,196
|
|
|
From fixed
8.11% to
LIBOR + 3.85%
|
|
March 2035
|
|
March 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Levitt Capital Trust II
|
|
|
May 2005
|
|
|
|
30,928
|
|
|
|
30,928
|
|
|
From fixed
8.09% to
LIBOR + 3.80%
|
|
June 2035
|
|
June 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Levitt Capital Trust III
|
|
|
June 2006
|
|
|
|
15,464
|
|
|
|
15,464
|
|
|
From fixed
9.25% to
LIBOR + 3.80%
|
|
June 2036
|
|
June 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Levitt Capital Trust IV
|
|
|
July 2006
|
|
|
|
15,464
|
|
|
|
15,464
|
|
|
From fixed
9.35% to
LIBOR + 3.80%
|
|
September 2036
|
|
September 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
85,052
|
|
|
|
85,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company formed four statutory business trusts which issued
trust preferred securities to third parties and trust common
securities to the Company and used the proceeds to purchase an
identical amount of junior subordinated debentures from the
Company. Interest on the junior subordinated debentures and
distributions on these trust preferred securities are payable
quarterly in arrears at the fixed rate as described in the above
table until the optional redemption date and thereafter at the
floating rate as specified in the above table until the
corresponding scheduled maturity date. The trust preferred
securities are subject to mandatory redemption, in whole or in
part, upon repayment of the junior subordinated debentures at
maturity or their earlier redemption. The junior subordinated
debentures are redeemable in whole or in part at our option at
any time after five years from the issue date or sooner
following certain specified events.
Some of the Companys subsidiaries have borrowings which
contain covenants that, among other things, require the
subsidiary to maintain financial ratios and a minimum net worth.
These requirements may limit the amount of debt that the
subsidiaries can incur in the future and restrict the payment of
dividends from subsidiaries to the Parent Company. The loan
agreements generally require repayment of specified amounts upon
a sale of a portion of the property collateralizing the debt.
The land acquisition and development mortgage notes payable,
commercial development mortgage notes payable and the borrowing
base facility all have loan to value limitations. The commercial
development mortgage notes payable also have debt service
coverage ratio limitations. At December 31, 2008, the
Company was in compliance with all loan agreement financial
requirements and covenants. See Note 15 for further
discussion of Cores debt covenants.
At December 31, 2008, the aggregate required scheduled
principal payment of indebtedness in each of the next five years
is approximately as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
3,567
|
|
2010
|
|
|
8,713
|
|
2011
|
|
|
188,520
|
|
2012
|
|
|
26,309
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,265
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
121,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
349,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-229
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The timing of contractual payments for debt obligations assumes
the exercise of all loan extensions available at the
Companys sole discretion.
|
|
12.
|
Development
Bonds Payable
|
In connection with the development of certain of Cores
projects, community development, special assessment or
improvement districts have been established and may utilize
tax-exempt bond financing to fund construction or acquisition of
certain
on-site and
off-site infrastructure improvements near or at these
communities. The obligation to pay principal and interest on the
bonds issued by the districts is assigned to each parcel within
the district, and a priority assessment lien may be placed on
benefited parcels to provide security for the debt service. The
bonds, including interest and redemption premiums, if any, and
the associated priority lien on the property are typically
payable, secured and satisfied by revenues, fees, or assessments
levied on the property benefited. Core is required to pay the
revenues, fees, and assessments levied by the districts on the
properties it still owns that are benefited by the improvements.
Core may also be required to pay down a specified portion of the
bonds at the time each unit or parcel is sold. The costs of
these obligations are capitalized to inventory during the
development period and recognized as cost of sales when the
properties are sold.
Cores bond financing at December 31, 2008 and 2007
consisted of district bonds totaling $218.7 million with
outstanding amounts of approximately $130.5 million and
$82.9 million, respectively. Further, at December 31,
2008 and 2007, there was approximately $82.4 million and
$129.5 million, respectively, available under these bonds
to fund future development expenditures. Bond obligations at
December 31, 2008 mature in 2035 and 2040. As of
December 31, 2008, Core owned approximately 16% of the
property subject to assessments within the community development
district and approximately 91% of the property subject to
assessments within the special assessment district. During the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, Core recorded
approximately $584,000, $1.3 million and $1.7 million,
respectively, in assessments on property owned by it in the
districts. Core is responsible for any assessed amounts until
the underlying property is sold and will continue to be
responsible for the annual assessments if the property is never
sold. In addition, Core has guaranteed payments for assessments
under the district bonds in Tradition, Florida which would
require funding if future assessments to be allocated to
property owners are insufficient to repay the bonds. Management
has evaluated this exposure based upon the criteria in
SFAS No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies, and has determined that there have been
no substantive changes to the projected density or land use in
the development subject to the bond which would make it probable
that Core would have to fund future shortfalls in assessments.
In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue
No. 91-10,
Accounting for Special Assessments and Tax Increment
Financing, the Company records a liability for the
estimated developer obligations that are fixed and determinable
and user fees that are required to be paid or transferred at the
time the parcel or unit is sold to an end user. At
December 31, 2008 and 2007, the liability related to
developer obligations was $3.3 million associated with
Cores ownership of the property and is recorded in the
consolidated statements of financial condition (note 11).
|
|
13.
|
Employee
Benefit Plan
|
The Company has a defined contribution plan established pursuant
to Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Employees
who have completed three months of service and have reached the
age of 18 are eligible to participate. During the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006, the Companys
contributions to the plan amounted to $302,000,
$1.1 million, and $1.3 million, respectively. These
amounts are included in selling, general and administrative
expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations.
F-230
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
14.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions
|
The Company and BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. (Bancorp)
are under common control. The controlling shareholder of the
Company and Bancorp is BFC Financial Corporation
(BFC). Bancorp is the parent company of
BankAtlantic. The Companys Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer, Alan B. Levan, and the Companys Vice Chairman,
John E. Abdo, collectively own or control shares of BFCs
common stock representing a majority of BFCs total voting
power. Mr. Levan and Mr. Abdo are also directors of
the Company, and executive officers and directors of BFC,
Bancorp and BankAtlantic, and Mr. Levan and Mr. Abdo
are the Chairman and Vice Chairman, respectively, of Bluegreen.
The Company occupied office space at BankAtlantics
corporate headquarters through November 2006. BFC provided this
office space on a month-to-month basis and received
reimbursements for overhead based on market rates. Pursuant to
the terms of a shared services agreement between the Company and
BFC Shared Services Corporation, certain administrative
services, including human resources, risk management, and
investor and public relations, are provided to the Company by
BFC Shared Services Corporation on a percentage of cost basis.
The total amounts paid for these services in 2008, 2007 and 2006
were $1.1 million, $1.1 million, and $912,000,
respectively, and may not be representative of the amounts that
would be paid in an arms-length transaction. The Company entered
into a sublease agreement with BFC, effective May 2008, to lease
space located at the BankAtlantic corporate office for the
Companys corporate staff at an annual rate of
approximately $152,000. During the year ended December 31,
2008, the Company paid BFC approximately $101,000 under this
sublease agreement.
The Company entered into an agreement with BankAtlantic,
effective March 2008, pursuant to which BankAtlantic agreed to
house the Companys information technology servers and
provide hosting, security and managed services to the Company
relating to its information technology operations. Pursuant to
the agreement, the Company paid BankAtlantic a one-time
set-up
charge of approximately $17,000 and agreed to pay BankAtlantic
monthly hosting fees of $10,000 for these services. During the
year ended December 31, 2008, the Company paid monthly
hosting fees to BankAtlantic of approximately $73,000.
The following table sets forth fees paid to the indicated
related parties (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
BFC
|
|
$
|
1,180
|
|
|
|
1,057
|
|
|
|
912
|
|
Bancorp
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fees
|
|
$
|
1,331
|
|
|
|
1,158
|
|
|
|
1,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The payments represent rent, services performed or expense
reimbursements.
Levitt and Sons utilized the services of Conrad &
Scherer, P.A., a law firm in which William R. Scherer, a member
of the Companys Board of Directors, is a member. Levitt
and Sons related party information for the year ended
December 31, 2008 was not included in the Companys
consolidated statements of operations due to the deconsolidation
of Levitt and Sons as of November 9, 2007. Levitt and Sons
paid fees aggregating $22,000 and $470,000 to this firm during
the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
No fees were paid to this firm in 2008.
Certain of the Companys executive officers separately
receive compensation from affiliates of the Company for services
rendered to those affiliates. Members of the Companys
Board of Directors and executive officers also have banking
relationships with BankAtlantic in the ordinary course of
BankAtlantics business.
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, $4.4 million and
$6.1 million, respectively, of cash and cash equivalents
were held on deposit by BankAtlantic. Interest on deposits held
at BankAtlantic for the years ended
F-231
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was approximately $72,000,
$147,000 and $436,000, respectively. Additionally, at
December 31, 2008, BankAtlantic facilitated the placement
of $49.9 million of FDIC insured certificates of deposits
with other insured depository institutions on our behalf through
the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service
(CDARS) program. The CDARS program facilitates the
placement of funds into certificates of deposits issued by other
financial institutions in increments of less than the standard
FDIC insurance maximum to insure that both principal and
interest are eligible for full FDIC insurance coverage.
During 2006, BankAtlantic reimbursed the Company $438,000 for
the out-of-pocket costs incurred by it in connection with the
Companys efforts to develop certain property owned by Bank
Atlantic, including rezoning of property and obtaining permits
necessary to develop the property for residential and commercial
use.
|
|
15.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
The Companys rent expense for premises and equipment for
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was
$520,000, $2.6 million and $2.7 million, respectively.
Approximate minimum future rentals due under non-cancelable
leases with a term remaining of at least one year are as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
1,279
|
|
2010
|
|
|
700
|
|
2011
|
|
|
362
|
|
2012
|
|
|
190
|
|
2013
|
|
|
196
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of the above lease payments, $604,000 was accrued at
December 31, 2008 related to leased furniture and fixtures
located at vacated lease space.
Tradition Development Company, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Core Communities (TDC), has an existing advertising
agreement with the operator of a Major League Baseball team
pursuant to which, among other advertising rights, TDC obtained
a royalty-free license to use, among others, the trademark
Tradition Field at the sports complex located in
Port St. Lucie and the naming rights to that complex. The
initial term of the agreement terminates on December 31,
2013; provided, however, upon payment of a specified buy-out fee
and compliance with other contractual procedures, TDC has the
right to terminate the agreement at any time. Required
cumulative payments under the agreement through
December 31, 2013 are approximately $923,000.
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had outstanding
surety bonds and letters of credit of approximately
$8.2 million and $7.1 million, respectively, related
primarily to its obligations to various governmental entities to
construct improvements in its various communities. The Company
estimates that approximately $5.0 million of work remains
to complete these improvements and does not believe that any
outstanding bonds or letters of credit will likely be drawn upon.
In January of 2009, Core was advised by one of its lenders that
they had received an external appraisal on the land that serves
as collateral for a development mortgage note payable with an
outstanding balance of $86.9 million at December 31,
2008. The appraised value would suggest the potential for a
remargining payment to bring the note payable back in line with
the minimum loan-to-value requirement. The lender is conducting
their internal review procedures of the appraisal, including the
determination of the appraised
F-232
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
value. As of the date of this filing, the lenders
evaluation is continuing and until such time as there is final
conclusion on the part of the lender, the amount of a possible
re-margin, if any, is not determinable.
Levitt and Sons had $33.3 million in surety bonds related
to its ongoing projects at the time of the filing of the
Chapter 11 Cases. In the event that these obligations are
drawn and paid by the surety, Woodbridge could be responsible
for up to $11.7 million plus costs and expenses in
accordance with the surety indemnity agreements. As of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company had
$1.1 million and $1.8 million, respectively, in surety
bonds accrual at Woodbridge related to certain bonds which
management considers it to be probable that the Company will be
required to reimburse the surety under applicable indemnity
agreements. During the year ended December 31, 2008, the
Company reimbursed the surety $532,000 in accordance with the
indemnity agreement for bond claims paid during the period while
no reimbursements were made in 2007. It is unclear given the
uncertainty involved in the Chapter 11 Cases whether and to
what extent the remaining outstanding surety bonds of Levitt and
Sons will be drawn and the extent to which Woodbridge may be
responsible for additional amounts beyond this accrual. It is
unlikely that Woodbridge would have the ability to receive any
repayment, assets or other consideration as recovery of any
amounts it is required to pay. The expense associated with this
accrual is included in other expense in the Other Operations
segment for the year ended December 31, 2007, due to its
non-recurring and unusual nature. In September 2008, a surety
filed a lawsuit to require Woodbridge to post $5.4 million
of collateral against a portion of the $11.7 million surety
bonds exposure in connection with two bonds totaling
$5.4 million with respect to which a municipality made
claims against the surety. The Company believes that the
municipality does not have the right to demand payment under the
bonds and initiated a lawsuit against the municipality and does
not believe that a loss is probable. Accordingly, the Company
did not accrue any amount in connection with this claim as of
December 31, 2008. As claims were made on the bonds, the
surety requested the Company post a $4.0 million letter of
credit as security while the matter is litigated with the
municipality and the Company has complied with that request.
In the third and fourth quarters of 2007, substantially all of
Levitt and Sons employees were terminated and
22 employees were terminated at Woodbridge primarily as a
result of the Chapter 11 Cases. On November 9, 2007,
Woodbridge implemented an employee fund and indicated that it
would pay up to $5 million of severance benefits to
terminated Levitt and Sons employees to supplement the limited
termination benefits which Levitt and Sons was permitted to pay
to those employees. Levitt and Sons is restricted in the amount
of termination benefits it can pay to its former employees by
virtue of the Chapter 11 Cases.
The following table summarizes the restructuring related
accruals activity recorded for the years ended December 31,
2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent
|
|
|
Surety
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractor
|
|
|
Bond
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Facilities
|
|
|
Agreements
|
|
|
Accrual
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
4,864
|
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
|
|
1,497
|
|
|
|
1,826
|
|
|
|
9,197
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(2,910
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,986
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
1,954
|
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
|
|
1,421
|
|
|
|
1,826
|
|
|
|
6,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
2,238
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
2,228
|
|
Cash payments
|
|
|
(4,063
|
)
|
|
|
(446
|
)
|
|
|
(824
|
)
|
|
|
(532
|
)
|
|
|
(5,865
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
|
704
|
|
|
|
597
|
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
|
|
2,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The severance related and benefits accrual includes severance,
severance related payments made to Levitt and Sons employees,
payroll taxes and other benefits related to the terminations
that occurred in 2007 as part
F-233
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
of the Chapter 11 Cases. For the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company paid approximately
$4.1 million and $600,000, respectively, in severance and
termination charges related to the employee fund as well as
severance for employees other than Levitt and Sons employees
which is reflected in the Other Operations segment and paid
$2.3 million in severance to the employees of the
Homebuilding Division prior to deconsolidation in 2007.
Employees entitled to participate in the fund either received a
payment stream, which in certain cases extended over two years,
or a lump sum payment, dependent on a variety of factors. For
any amounts paid related to the fund from the Other Operations
segment, these payments were in exchange for an assignment to
the Company by those employees of their unsecured claims against
Levitt and Sons. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, there was
$129,000 and $2.0 million, respectively, accrued to be paid
related to this fund as well as severance for employees other
than Levitt and Sons employees. As of December 31, 2008,
the Company does not expect to incur additional severance
related expenses with respect to the Levitt and Sons employees.
The facilities accrual represents expense associated with
property and equipment leases that the Company had entered into
that are no longer providing a benefit to the Company, as well
as termination fees related to contractual obligations the
Company cancelled. Included in this amount are future minimum
lease payments, fees and expenses, net of estimated sublease
income for which the provisions of SFAS No. 146
Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal
Activities, as applicable, were satisfied. This
restructuring expense is included in selling, general and
administrative expenses for the Other Operations segment for the
year ended December 31, 2007.
The independent contractor related expense relates to two
contractor agreements entered into with former Levitt and Sons
employees. The agreements are for past and future consulting
services. The total commitment related to these agreements is
$681,000 as of December 31, 2008 and will be paid monthly
through 2009. The expense associated with these arrangements is
included in selling, general and administrative expenses for the
Other Operations segment for the years ended December 31,
2008 and 2007.
The Company entered into an indemnity agreement in April 2004
with a joint venture partner at Altman Longleaf relating to,
among other obligations, that partners guarantee of the
joint ventures indebtedness. The liability under the
indemnity agreement was limited to the amount of any
distributions from the joint venture which exceeded the
Companys original capital and other contributions.
Original capital contributions were approximately $585,000 and
the Company has received approximately $1.2 million in
distributions since 2004. In December 2008, the Companys
interest in the joint venture was sold and it received
approximately $182,000 as a result of the sale and the Company
was released from any potential obligation of indemnity which
may have arisen in connection with the joint venture.
The benefit for income tax expense consists of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Current tax benefit (provision):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
29,690
|
|
|
|
(7,350
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(1,143
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,708
|
|
|
|
(8,493
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-234
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Deferred income tax (provision) benefit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,421
|
)
|
|
|
13,060
|
|
State
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,118
|
)
|
|
|
1,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,539
|
)
|
|
|
14,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax benefit
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
22,169
|
|
|
|
5,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys benefit for income taxes differs from the
federal statutory tax rate of 35% due to the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Income tax benefit at expected federal income tax rate of 35%
|
|
$
|
49,116
|
|
|
|
89,876
|
|
|
|
5,227
|
|
Benefit for state taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
5,005
|
|
|
|
9,381
|
|
|
|
936
|
|
Tax-exempt income
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
Goodwill impairment adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(458
|
)
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
(317
|
)
|
Loss from Levitt and Sons
|
|
|
20,981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(75,269
|
)
|
|
|
(76,730
|
)
|
|
|
(425
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(649
|
)
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
22,169
|
|
|
|
5,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-235
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to
significant portions of the deferred tax assets consist of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate held for sale capitalized for tax purposes in excess
of amounts capitalized for financial statement purposes
|
|
$
|
926
|
|
|
|
2,016
|
|
Real estate valuation adjustments
|
|
|
1,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in Levitt and Sons
|
|
|
46,393
|
|
|
|
68,339
|
|
Share based compensation
|
|
|
1,773
|
|
|
|
1,427
|
|
Accrued and other non-deductible expenses
|
|
|
904
|
|
|
|
2,237
|
|
Investment in Bluegreen
|
|
|
10,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in Office Depot
|
|
|
4,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in unconsolidated trusts
|
|
|
828
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal net operating loss carryforward
|
|
|
67,050
|
|
|
|
14,191
|
|
State net operating loss carryforward
|
|
|
10,723
|
|
|
|
5,122
|
|
Income recognized for tax purposes and deferred for financial
statement purposes
|
|
|
7,510
|
|
|
|
7,228
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4,095
|
|
|
|
2,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
156,424
|
|
|
|
102,609
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(154,138
|
)
|
|
|
(78,562
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
2,286
|
|
|
|
24,047
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in Bluegreen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,768
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
|
496
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,863
|
|
|
|
1,783
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
2,286
|
|
|
|
24,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less the deferred income tax (assets) liabilities at beginning
of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,635
|
)
|
Implementation of FIN 48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,798
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes on Bluegreens unrealized gains,
losses and issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Provision) benefit for deferred income taxes
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
(7,539
|
)
|
Activity in the deferred tax valuation allowance (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$
|
78,562
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
Increase in deferred tax valuation allowance
|
|
|
75,269
|
|
|
|
76,730
|
|
Increase in deferred tax valuation allowance paid in
capital
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
1,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period
|
|
$
|
154,138
|
|
|
|
78,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes, requires that all available evidence, both
positive and negative, be considered to determine whether, based
on the weight of that evidence, a valuation allowance is needed.
Future realization of the tax benefits of an existing deductible
temporary difference or carryforward
F-236
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
ultimately depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income
of the appropriate character. Possible sources of taxable income
that can be considered include: (i) future reversals of
existing taxable temporary differences; (ii) future taxable
income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and
carryforwards; (iii) taxable income in prior carryback
years; and (iv) tax planning strategies.
The Company has performed such an analysis, and a valuation
allowance has been provided against deferred tax assets to the
extent they cannot be used to offset future income arising from
the expected reversal of taxable differences. The Company has
therefore established a valuation allowance for the entire
deferred tax assets, net of the deferred tax liabilities. A
valuation allowance of $154.1 million and
$78.6 million as of December 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively, has been provided due to
the significance of the Companys losses, including losses
generated by Levitt and Sons, and significant uncertainties of
its ability to realize these assets. The Company will be
required to update its estimates of future taxable income based
upon additional information management obtains and will continue
to evaluate the realizability of the net deferred tax asset on a
quarterly basis.
Federal and Florida net operating loss carryforwards amount to
approximately $191.6 million and $191.2 million,
respectively, and expire through the year 2028. Of the total net
operating loss carryforwards, approximately $131.8 million
were generated be Levitt and Sons after filing for Bankruptcy
protection.
In August of 2008, the Company received $29.7 million from
the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in connection
with the filing of a refund claim for the carry back to 2005 and
2006 of tax losses incurred in 2007.
The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax as well
as to income tax in multiple state jurisdictions. The Company is
no longer subject to U.S. federal or state and local income
tax examinations by tax authorities for tax years before 2005.
The IRS commenced an examination of the Companys
U.S. income tax return for 2004 in the fourth quarter of
2006 and completed its examination in the first quarter of 2008.
The conclusion of the examination resulted in a small refund
received in the second quarter of 2008, which had an immaterial
effect on the Companys results of operations and financial
condition. On January 8, 2009, Woodbridge receive a letter
from the IRS that Woodbridge and its subsidiaries has been
selected for an examination of the tax periods ending
December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 in connection with the
2007 tax refund claim. The IRS examination process is in the
early planning stage.
As a result of the implementation of FIN 48, the Company
recognized a decrease of approximately $260,000 in the liability
for unrecognized tax benefits, which was accounted for as a
reduction to the January 1, 2007 balance of retained
earnings. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of
unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
2,365
|
|
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
|
|
|
542
|
|
Additions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions for tax positions of prior years
|
|
|
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
33
|
|
Lapse of Statute of Limitations
|
|
|
(575
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
2,365
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008, the Company had gross tax affected
unrecognized tax benefits of $2.4 million, of which
$248,000, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to
unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense. During the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company recognized
approximately $(22,000),
F-237
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
$168,000, and $168,000 in interest and penalties, respectively.
The Company had approximately $314,000 and $336,000 for the
payment of interest and penalties accrued at December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
The following table summarizes other revenues detail information
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage & title operations
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
2,243
|
|
|
|
4,070
|
|
Lease/rental income
|
|
|
9,892
|
|
|
|
5,803
|
|
|
|
3,254
|
|
Marketing fees
|
|
|
579
|
|
|
|
1,610
|
|
|
|
1,243
|
|
Impact fees
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Irrigation revenue
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
|
802
|
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,701
|
|
|
|
10,458
|
|
|
|
9,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.
|
Other
Expenses and Interest and Other Income
|
Other expenses and interest and other income are summarized as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title and mortgage operations expense
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
1,539
|
|
|
|
2,362
|
|
Loss on disposal of fixed assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
564
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hurricane expense, net of projected recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,307
|
|
Surety bond indemnification
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expenses
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
3,929
|
|
|
|
3,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
3,264
|
|
|
|
4,046
|
|
|
|
2,882
|
|
Gain on sale of fixed assets
|
|
|
2,520
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
1,329
|
|
Gain on sale of equity securities
|
|
|
1,178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited buyer deposits
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
6,196
|
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
697
|
|
|
|
992
|
|
|
|
933
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income
|
|
$
|
8,030
|
|
|
|
11,264
|
|
|
|
7,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in other expense in the year ended December 31,
2007 is $1.8 million associated with Woodbridges
potential surety bond obligation. Management believes it is
probable that the Company will be required to reimburse the
surety under the indemnity agreement. No similar other expense
was recorded in the year ended December 31, 2008. See
Note 15 for further discussion.
|
|
19.
|
Fair
Value Measurements
|
Estimated fair values of financial instruments are determined
using available market information and appropriate valuation
methodologies. However, judgments are involved in interpreting
market data to develop
F-238
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented
herein are not necessarily indicative of amounts the Company
could realize in a current market exchange.
The estimated fair values of cash, cash equivalent, short-term
investments, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate
carrying value as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, because of
the liquid nature of the assets and relatively short maturities
of the obligations. The company estimates that the fair value of
its notes receivable at December 31, 2008 and 2007 were
approximately $4.0 million and were based upon the Prime
rate. The Company estimates that at December 31, 2008 and
2007, the fair value of its fixed rate debt was approximately
$31.7 million and $93.7 million, respectively, and the
fair value of its variable rate debt was approximately
$227.1 million and $242.6 million, respectively, based
upon the current rates and spreads it would pay to obtain
similar borrowings.
On January 1, 2008, the Company partially adopted
SFAS No. 157, which, among other things, defines fair
value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair
value and expands disclosure for each major asset and liability
category measured at fair value on either a recurring or
nonrecurring basis. The Company did not adopt the
SFAS No. 157 fair value framework for nonfinancial
assets and liabilities, except for items that are recognized or
disclosed at fair value in the financial statements at least
annually. SFAS 157 clarifies that fair value is an exit
price, representing the amount that would either be received to
sell an asset or be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is
a market-based measurement that should be determined based on
assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an
asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions,
SFAS No. 157 establishes a three-tier fair value
hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair
value as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
|
|
|
|
Level 2. Inputs, other than the quoted
prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or
indirectly; and
|
|
|
|
Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which
there is little or no market data, which require the reporting
entity to develop its own assumptions.
|
Investment
Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Hierarchy
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Investment in Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
$
|
29,789
|
|
Investment in unconsolidated trusts
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
Investment in other equity securities
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
|
4,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
34,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bankruptcy
of Levitt and Sons
On November 9, 2007, the Debtors filed voluntary petitions
for relief under the Chapter 11 Cases in the Bankruptcy
Court. The Debtors commenced the Chapter 11 Cases in order
to preserve the value of their assets and to facilitate an
orderly wind-down of their businesses and disposition of their
assets in a manner intended to maximize the recoveries of all
constituents.
On November 27, 2007, the Office of the United States
Trustee (the U.S. Trustee), appointed an official
committee of unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 Cases
(the Creditors Committee). On January 22,
2008, the U.S. Trustee appointed a Joint Home Purchase
Deposit Creditors Committee of Creditors Holding Unsecured
Claims (the Deposit Holders Committee, and
together with the Creditors Committee, the
Committees) The Committees have a right to appear
and be heard in the Chapter 11 Cases.
On November 27, 2007, the Bankruptcy Court granted the
Debtors Motion for Authority to Incur Chapter 11
Administrative Expense Claim (the Chapter 11 Admin.
Expense Motion), thereby authorizing the
F-239
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Debtors to incur a post petition administrative expense claim in
favor of Woodbridge for administrative costs relating to certain
services and benefits provided by Woodbridge in favor of the
Debtors (the Post Petition Services). While the
Bankruptcy Court approved the incurrence of the amounts as
unsecured post petition administrative expense claims, the
payment of such claims is subject to additional court approval.
In addition to the unsecured administrative expense claims,
Woodbridge has pre-petition secured and unsecured claims against
the Debtors. The Debtors have scheduled the amounts due to
Woodbridge in the Chapter 11 Cases. The unsecured
pre-petition claims of Woodbridge scheduled by the Debtors are
approximately $67.3 million and the secured pre-petition
claim scheduled by the Debtors is approximately $460,000. Since
the Chapter 11 Cases were filed, Woodbridge has also
incurred certain administrative costs related to the Post
Petition Services. These costs amounted to $1.6 million and
$748,000 in the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Additionally, as disclosed in (Note 15), in
the year ended December 31, 2008, Woodbridge reimbursed a
Levitt and Sons surety for $532,000 of bond claims paid by the
surety. No payments were made in the year ended
December 31, 2007. The payment by the Debtors of its
outstanding advances and the Post Petition Services expenses are
subject to the risks inherent to recovery by creditors in the
Chapter 11 Cases. Woodbridge has also filed contingent
claims with respect to any liability it may have arising out of
disputed indemnification obligations under certain surety bonds.
Woodbridge also implemented an employee severance fund in favor
of certain employees of the Debtors. Employees who received
funds as part of this program as of December 31, 2008,
which totaled approximately $3.9 million as of that date,
have assigned their unsecured claims against the Debtors to the
Company. It is highly unlikely that Woodbridge will recover
these or any other amounts associated with its unsecured claims
against the Debtors. In addition, the Debtors asserted certain
further claims against Woodbridge, including an entitlement to a
portion of the $29.7 million federal tax refund which
Woodbridge received as a consequence of losses experienced at
Levitt and Sons in prior periods; however, the parties have
entered into the Settlement Agreement described below.
On June 27, 2008, Woodbridge entered into a settlement
agreement (the Settlement Agreement) with the
Debtors and the Joint Committee of Unsecured Creditors (the
Joint Committee) appointed in the Chapter 11
Cases. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, among other things,
(i) Woodbridge agreed to pay to the Debtors
bankruptcy estates the sum of $12.5 million plus accrued
interest from May 22, 2008 through the date of payment,
(ii) Woodbridge agreed to waive and release substantially
all of the claims it had against the Debtors, including its
administrative expense claims through July 2008, and
(iii) the Debtors (joined by the Joint Committee) agreed to
waive and release any claims they had against Woodbridge and its
affiliates. After certain of Levitt and Sons creditors
indicated that they objected to the terms of the Settlement
Agreement and stated a desire to pursue claims against
Woodbridge, Woodbridge, the Debtors and the Joint Committee
agreed in principal to an amendment to the Settlement Agreement,
pursuant to which Woodbridge would, in lieu of the
$12.5 million payment previously agreed to, pay
$8.0 million to the Debtors bankruptcy estates and
place $4.5 million in a release fund to be disbursed to
third party creditors in exchange for a third party release and
injunction. The amendment also provided for an additional
$300,000 payment by Woodbridge to a deposit holders fund. The
Settlement Agreement, as amended, was subject to a number of
conditions, including the approval of the Bankruptcy Court.
Certain of the Debtor subsidiaries of Levitt and Sons have been
provided with post-petition financing (DIP Loans)
from a third-party lender (the DIP Lender) which had
financed such Debtors projects. Under the agreements for
the DIP Loans, the DIP Loans are to be used for (i) the
reimbursement of the DIP Lenders costs and fees,
(ii) the costs of managing and safeguarding the projects,
(iii) the costs of making the projects ready for sale,
(iv) the costs to complete the projects, (v) the
general working capital needs of the Debtors related to the
projects and (vi) such other costs and expenses related to
the DIP Loans or the projects as the DIP Lender may elect. The
Bankruptcy Courts order approving the DIP Loans also
approved the sales of homes in the projects with the net
proceeds from such sales being applied towards the DIP Loans.
The order also appointed a Chief Administrator to manage and
supervise all administrative functions of these Debtors related
to the projects in accordance with the scope of authority set
forth in the DIP Loan agreements. These projects represent 89.7%
of the total assets, 66.3% of the total liabilities and 34.1% of
the shareholders deficit of Levitt and Sons at December 31,
2008.
F-240
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
During the year ended December 31, 2008, the DIP Loans
financed construction and development activities and selling,
general and administrative expenses related to the projects, as
well as the costs, fees and other expenses of the DIP Lender,
including interest expense. Additionally, during the year ended
December 31, 2008, homes in the projects have been sold and
closed, resulting in the receipt by the Debtors of sales
proceeds. The Chief Administrator is maintaining the accounting
records for these transactions in accordance with the DIP Loan
agreements and, as a result, financial information is not
available to the Company which could be used to record these
transactions in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles on a basis consistent with the Companys
accounting for similar transactions. Accordingly, these
transactions have not been reflected in the financial
information for Levitt and Sons included in
(Note 24) to the Companys consolidated financial
statements. However, as described herein, due to the
deconsolidation of Levitt and Sons from Woodbridges
statements of financial condition and results of operations as
of November 9, 2007, these transactions, and the omission
of the results of these transactions, will not have an impact on
the Companys financial condition or operating results.
Class Action
Lawsuit
On January 25, 2008, plaintiff Robert D. Dance filed a
purported class action complaint as a putative purchaser of the
Companys securities against the Company and certain of its
officers and directors, asserting claims under the federal
securities law and seeking damages. This action was filed in the
United States District Court for the Southern District of
Florida and is captioned Dance v. Levitt Corp. et al.,
No. 08-CV-60111-DLG.
The securities litigation purports to be brought on behalf of
all purchasers of the Companys securities beginning on
January 31, 2007 and ending on August 14, 2007. The
complaint alleges that the defendants violated
Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and
Rule 10b-5
promulgated there under by issuing a series of false
and/or
misleading statements concerning the Companys financial
results, prospects and condition. The Company intends to
vigorously defend this action.
Surety
Bond Claim
In September 2008, a surety filed a lawsuit to require
Woodbridge to post $5.4 million of collateral in connection
with two bonds totaling $5.4 million with respect to which
a municipality made claims against the surety. We believe that
the municipality does not have the right to demand payment under
the bonds and we initiated a lawsuit against the municipality
and do not believe that a loss is probable. Accordingly, we did
not accrue any amount related to this claim as of
December 31, 2008. As claims were made on the bonds, the
surety requested the Company post a $4.0 million letter of
credit as security while the matter is litigated with the
municipality and the Company has complied with that request.
Operating segments are components of an enterprise about which
separate financial information is available that is regularly
reviewed by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how
to allocate resources and in assessing performance. During the
year ended December 31, 2008, the Company operated through
two reportable business segments, the Land Division and Other
Operations segments. During the years ended December 31,
2007 and 2006, the Company also operated through two additional
reportable business segments, the Primary Homebuilding and
Tennessee Homebuilding segments, both of which were eliminated
as a result of the Companys deconsolidation of Levitt and
Sons as of November 9, 2007. The Company evaluates segment
performance primarily based on pre-tax income. The information
provided for segment reporting is based on managements
internal reports. Except as otherwise indicated, the accounting
policies of the segments are the same as those of the Company.
Eliminations in periods prior to the year ended
December 31, 2008 consisted of the elimination of sales and
profits on real estate transactions between the Land Division
and Primary Homebuilding segment, and eliminations for the year
ended December 31, 2008 consist of the elimination of
transactions between the Land Division and Other Operations
segments. All of the eliminated transactions were recorded based
upon terms that management believed would be attained in an
arms-length transaction. The presentation and allocation of
assets, liabilities and results of operations may not reflect
the actual economic costs of the segments as stand-alone
businesses. If a different basis of allocation
F-241
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
were utilized, the relative contributions of the segments might
differ, but management believes that the relative trends in
segments would likely not be impacted.
The Companys Land Division segment consists of the
operations of Core Communities, and the Other Operations segment
consists of the operations of the Parent company, Carolina Oak,
and Pizza Fusion, other activities through Cypress Creek Capital
and Snapper Creek, an equity investment in Bluegreen and an
investment in Office Depot. In 2007, the Other Operations
segment also consisted of Levitt Commercial, LLC, which
specialized in the development of industrial properties. Levitt
Commercial, LLC ceased development activities in 2007. The
Companys Homebuilding Division consisted of the Primary
Homebuilding segment and the Tennessee Homebuilding segment. The
results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2008
do not include the results of operations of the Homebuilding
Division due to the deconsolidation of Levitt and Sons, the
operations of which comprised the Homebuilding Division, as of
November 9, 2007. The results of operations and financial
condition of Carolina Oak as of and for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 were included in the Primary
Homebuilding segment, whereas the results of operations and
financial condition of Carolina Oak as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2008 are included in the Other Operations
segment.
The following tables present segment information for the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of real estate
|
|
$
|
11,268
|
|
|
|
2,484
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
13,837
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
10,592
|
|
|
|
1,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
21,860
|
|
|
|
3,593
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
25,538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales of real estate
|
|
|
6,632
|
|
|
|
16,151
|
|
|
|
(10,055
|
)
|
|
|
12,728
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
24,608
|
|
|
|
26,717
|
|
|
|
(571
|
)
|
|
|
50,754
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
3,637
|
|
|
|
8,315
|
|
|
|
(1,085
|
)
|
|
|
10,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
34,877
|
|
|
|
51,183
|
|
|
|
(11,711
|
)
|
|
|
74,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,996
|
|
Impairment of investment in Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(94,426
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(94,426
|
)
|
Impairment of other investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,120
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,120
|
)
|
Interest and other income
|
|
|
5,685
|
|
|
|
4,001
|
|
|
|
(1,656
|
)
|
|
|
8,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(7,332
|
)
|
|
|
(143,139
|
)
|
|
|
10,140
|
|
|
|
(140,331
|
)
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(7,332
|
)
|
|
|
(143,139
|
)
|
|
|
10,140
|
|
|
|
(140,331
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory of real estate
|
|
$
|
208,033
|
|
|
|
34,719
|
|
|
|
(1,434
|
)
|
|
|
241,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
339,941
|
|
|
|
220,587
|
|
|
|
(1,274
|
)
|
|
|
559,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
215,332
|
|
|
|
134,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
248,969
|
|
|
|
185,513
|
|
|
|
5,242
|
|
|
|
439,724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
90,972
|
|
|
|
35,074
|
|
|
|
(6,516
|
)
|
|
|
119,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-242
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary
|
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
Homebuilding
|
|
|
Homebuilding
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of real estate
|
|
$
|
345,666
|
|
|
|
42,042
|
|
|
|
16,567
|
|
|
|
6,574
|
|
|
|
(734
|
)
|
|
|
410,115
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
2,243
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,585
|
|
|
|
952
|
|
|
|
(322
|
)
|
|
|
10,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
347,909
|
|
|
|
42,042
|
|
|
|
24,152
|
|
|
|
7,526
|
|
|
|
(1,056
|
)
|
|
|
420,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales of real estate
|
|
|
501,206
|
|
|
|
51,360
|
|
|
|
7,447
|
|
|
|
16,793
|
|
|
|
(3,565
|
)
|
|
|
573,241
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
61,568
|
|
|
|
5,010
|
|
|
|
19,077
|
|
|
|
32,508
|
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
117,924
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
7,258
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
2,629
|
|
|
|
1,073
|
|
|
|
(7,304
|
)
|
|
|
3,807
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
1,539
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
571,571
|
|
|
|
56,521
|
|
|
|
29,153
|
|
|
|
52,764
|
|
|
|
(11,108
|
)
|
|
|
698,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,275
|
|
Interest and other income
|
|
|
6,933
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
4,489
|
|
|
|
7,367
|
|
|
|
(7,608
|
)
|
|
|
11,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(216,729
|
)
|
|
|
(14,396
|
)
|
|
|
(512
|
)
|
|
|
(27,596
|
)
|
|
|
2,444
|
|
|
|
(256,789
|
)
|
Benefit (provision)for income taxes
|
|
|
1,396
|
|
|
|
(1,700
|
)
|
|
|
(5,910
|
)
|
|
|
34,297
|
|
|
|
(5,914
|
)
|
|
|
22,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(215,333
|
)
|
|
|
(16,096
|
)
|
|
|
(6,422
|
)
|
|
|
6,701
|
|
|
|
(3,470
|
)
|
|
|
(234,620
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory of real estate
|
|
$
|
38,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189,903
|
|
|
|
6,262
|
|
|
|
(7,332
|
)
|
|
|
227,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
38,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342,696
|
|
|
|
336,713
|
|
|
|
(5,307
|
)
|
|
|
712,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
39,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216,027
|
|
|
|
98,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
41,402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214,393
|
|
|
|
184,601
|
|
|
|
11,349
|
|
|
|
451,745
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
(2,653
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,303
|
|
|
|
152,112
|
|
|
|
(16,656
|
)
|
|
|
261,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-243
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary
|
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
Homebuilding
|
|
|
Homebuilding
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of real estate
|
|
$
|
424,420
|
|
|
|
76,299
|
|
|
|
69,778
|
|
|
|
11,041
|
|
|
|
(15,452
|
)
|
|
|
566,086
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
4,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,816
|
|
|
|
1,435
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
9,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
428,490
|
|
|
|
76,299
|
|
|
|
73,594
|
|
|
|
12,476
|
|
|
|
(15,532
|
)
|
|
|
575,327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales of real estate
|
|
|
367,252
|
|
|
|
72,807
|
|
|
|
42,662
|
|
|
|
11,649
|
|
|
|
(11,409
|
)
|
|
|
482,961
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
65,052
|
|
|
|
12,806
|
|
|
|
15,119
|
|
|
|
28,174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,151
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
2,362
|
|
|
|
1,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
434,666
|
|
|
|
86,920
|
|
|
|
57,781
|
|
|
|
39,831
|
|
|
|
(11,409
|
)
|
|
|
607,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,684
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,684
|
|
Interest and other income
|
|
|
2,982
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
2,650
|
|
|
|
4,059
|
|
|
|
(1,974
|
)
|
|
|
7,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(3,194
|
)
|
|
|
(10,494
|
)
|
|
|
18,463
|
|
|
|
(13,612
|
)
|
|
|
(6,097
|
)
|
|
|
(14,934
|
)
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes
|
|
|
1,508
|
|
|
|
3,241
|
|
|
|
(6,936
|
)
|
|
|
5,639
|
|
|
|
2,318
|
|
|
|
5,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(1,686
|
)
|
|
|
(7,253
|
)
|
|
|
11,527
|
|
|
|
(7,973
|
)
|
|
|
(3,779
|
)
|
|
|
(9,164
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory of real estate
|
|
$
|
608,358
|
|
|
|
56,214
|
|
|
|
176,356
|
|
|
|
13,269
|
|
|
|
(32,157
|
)
|
|
|
822,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
644,447
|
|
|
|
62,065
|
|
|
|
271,169
|
|
|
|
146,116
|
|
|
|
(33,131
|
)
|
|
|
1,090,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
378,633
|
|
|
|
39,274
|
|
|
|
95,980
|
|
|
|
101,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
615,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
529,476
|
|
|
|
55,524
|
|
|
|
133,015
|
|
|
|
49,357
|
|
|
|
(19,945
|
)
|
|
|
747,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
114,971
|
|
|
|
6,541
|
|
|
|
138,154
|
|
|
|
96,759
|
|
|
|
(13,186
|
)
|
|
|
343,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in total liabilities at the respective segments are net
receivable and payable amounts associated with intersegment
loans. These amounts eliminate fully in consolidation but have
the effect of decreasing or increasing liabilities when shown on
a standalone basis.
|
|
22.
|
Parent
Company Financial Statements
|
The Companys subordinated investment notes (the
Investment Notes) and junior subordinated debentures
(the Junior Subordinated Debentures) are direct
unsecured obligations of the Parent Company, are not guaranteed
by the Companys subsidiaries and are not secured by any
assets of the Company or its subsidiaries. The Parent Company
has historically relied on dividends or management fees from its
subsidiaries and earnings on its cash investments to fund its
operations, including debt service obligations relating to the
Investment Notes and Junior Subordinated Debentures. However, as
a result of the funds raised in the Companys 2007 rights
offering, the Parent Companys dependence on payments from
subsidiaries has been substantially reduced. The Company would
be restricted from paying dividends to its common shareholders
if an event of default exists under the terms of either the
Investment Notes or the Junior Subordinated Debentures.
F-244
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Some of the Companys subsidiaries incur indebtedness on
terms that, among other things, require the subsidiary to
maintain certain financial ratios and a minimum net worth. These
covenants may have the effect of limiting the amount of debt
that the subsidiaries can incur in the future and restricting
payments to the Parent Company. At December 31, 2008, under
the most restrictive of these covenants, approximately
$75.0 million of the subsidiaries net assets were not
available to transfer funds to the Company in the form of loans,
advances or dividends, and $17.7 million was available for
these transfers. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company
and its subsidiaries were in compliance with all loan agreement
financial covenants. At December 31, 2008, consolidated
retained earnings included approximately $8.6 million which
represented undistributed earnings recognized by the equity
method.
The accounting policies for the Parent Company are generally the
same as those policies described in the summary of significant
accounting policies in (Note 2). The Parent Companys
interests in its consolidated subsidiaries are reported under
equity method accounting for purposes of this presentation.
Condensed statements of financial condition at December 31,
2008 and 2007 and condensed statements of operations and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2008 are shown below:
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation (Parent Company Only)
Condensed
Statements of Financial Condition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands except share data)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
94,725
|
|
|
|
161,557
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
16,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory of real estate
|
|
|
6,818
|
|
|
|
5,950
|
|
Investment in Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
|
29,789
|
|
|
|
116,014
|
|
Investment in Unconsolidated Trusts
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
2,565
|
|
Investments in wholly-owned subsidiaries
|
|
|
52,272
|
|
|
|
110,598
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
52,279
|
|
|
|
32,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
253,017
|
|
|
|
429,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
4,604
|
|
|
|
42,932
|
|
Loss in excess of investment in subsidiary
|
|
|
39,432
|
|
|
|
39,432
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
85,052
|
|
|
|
85,052
|
|
Income tax payable
|
|
|
4,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
133,487
|
|
|
|
168,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value
Authorized: 5,000,000 shares Issued and outstanding: no
shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, Class A, $0.01 par value
Authorized: 30,000,000 shares Issued: 19,042,149 and
19,010,804 shares, respectively
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
Common stock, Class B, $0.01 par value
Authorized: 2,000,000 shares Issued and outstanding:
243,807 shares
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
F-245
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
339,780
|
|
|
|
337,565
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(218,868
|
)
|
|
|
(78,537
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
1,886
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,969
|
|
|
|
261,106
|
|
Less common stock in treasury, at cost (2,385,624 in
2008)
|
|
|
(1,439
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
119,530
|
|
|
|
261,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
253,017
|
|
|
|
429,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation (Parent Company Only)
Condensed
Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Earnings from Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
$
|
8,996
|
|
|
|
10,275
|
|
|
|
9,684
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
2,616
|
|
|
|
7,363
|
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
Costs and expenses(a)
|
|
|
123,618
|
|
|
|
44,880
|
|
|
|
28,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(112,006
|
)
|
|
|
(27,242
|
)
|
|
|
(14,977
|
)
|
Benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,567
|
|
|
|
6,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income before undistributed earnings from subsidiaries
|
|
|
(112,006
|
)
|
|
|
7,325
|
|
|
|
(8,815
|
)
|
Loss from consolidated subsidiaries, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(28,325
|
)
|
|
|
(241,945
|
)
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(140,331
|
)
|
|
|
(234,620
|
)
|
|
|
(9,164
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes an
other-than-temporary
impairment charge of $94.4 million incurred during the year
ended December 31, 2008 related to the Companys
investment in Bluegreen Corporation and a $2.1 million
impairment charge related to the Companys investment in
unconsolidated trusts. |
F-246
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation (Parent Company Only)
Condensed
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(140,331
|
)
|
|
|
(234,620
|
)
|
|
|
(9,164
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,595
|
|
|
|
2,664
|
|
|
|
1,352
|
|
(Decrease) increase in deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,240
|
)
|
|
|
2,953
|
|
Equity from earnings in Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
|
(8,996
|
)
|
|
|
(10,275
|
)
|
|
|
(9,684
|
)
|
Equity from loss in consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
28,325
|
|
|
|
241,945
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
Equity from loss in joint ventures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated trusts
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
(220
|
)
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
Share-based compensation expense related to stock options and
restricted stock
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
|
1,962
|
|
|
|
3,250
|
|
Impairment of investment in Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
|
94,426
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of other investment
|
|
|
2,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends received from consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
13,073
|
|
|
|
12,086
|
|
Write off of property and equipment
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory of real estate
|
|
|
(868
|
)
|
|
|
1,767
|
|
|
|
(3,552
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(1,247
|
)
|
|
|
(1,153
|
)
|
|
|
1,404
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
(4,694
|
)
|
|
|
5,043
|
|
|
|
(9,444
|
)
|
Current income tax
|
|
|
29,743
|
|
|
|
(6,249
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) by operating activities
|
|
|
31,985
|
|
|
|
(4,767
|
)
|
|
|
(10,626
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions and advances from real estate joint ventures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
Purchase of short-term investments
|
|
|
(9,600
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in restricted cash
|
|
|
(16,715
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in unconsolidated trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(928
|
)
|
Distributions from unconsolidated trusts
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(7,895
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(26,097
|
)
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
(8,492
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from notes and mortgage notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
479
|
|
Repayment of notes and mortgage notes payable
|
|
|
(772
|
)
|
|
|
(2,066
|
)
|
|
|
(686
|
)
|
Proceeds from junior subordinated notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,928
|
|
Cash paid for stock repurchase
|
|
|
(1,439
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for debt offering cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,077
|
)
|
Payments for stock issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in intercompany due
|
|
|
(70,509
|
)
|
|
|
6,905
|
|
|
|
(43,858
|
)
|
Cash dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(396
|
)
|
|
|
(1,585
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(72,720
|
)
|
|
|
157,245
|
|
|
|
(15,799
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(66,832
|
)
|
|
|
152,657
|
|
|
|
(34,917
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period
|
|
|
161,557
|
|
|
|
8,900
|
|
|
|
43,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
94,725
|
|
|
|
161,557
|
|
|
|
8,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-247
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
23.
|
Selected
Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)
|
Selected financial information for the quarterly periods in 2008
and 2007 is presented below. Due to rounding and changes in the
number of shares outstanding, the sum of the quarterly (loss)
earnings per share amounts may not equal the (loss) earnings per
share reported for the year (in thousands, except per share
data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
First
|
|
Second
|
|
Third
|
|
Fourth
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
2008
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
3,118
|
|
|
|
5,139
|
|
|
|
13,677
|
|
|
|
3,604
|
|
|
|
25,538
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
$
|
(15,679
|
)
|
|
|
(17,242
|
)
|
|
|
(22,116
|
)
|
|
|
(19,312
|
)
|
|
|
(74,349
|
)
|
Earnings from Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
$
|
526
|
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
2,241
|
|
|
|
5,018
|
|
|
|
8,996
|
|
Impairment of investment in Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53,576
|
)
|
|
|
(40,850
|
)
|
|
|
(94,426
|
)
|
Impairment of other investments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,120
|
)
|
|
|
(14,120
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(10,431
|
)
|
|
|
(8,942
|
)
|
|
|
(56,003
|
)
|
|
|
(64,955
|
)
|
|
|
(140,331
|
)
|
Loss per share, basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.54
|
)
|
|
|
(0.46
|
)
|
|
|
(2.91
|
)
|
|
|
(3.49
|
)
|
|
|
(7.35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
First
|
|
Second
|
|
Third
|
|
Fourth
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter
|
|
Quarter(a)
|
|
2007
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
143,795
|
|
|
|
127,840
|
|
|
|
125,824
|
|
|
|
23,114
|
|
|
|
420,573
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
$
|
(146,296
|
)
|
|
|
(205,616
|
)
|
|
|
(308,315
|
)
|
|
|
(38,674
|
)
|
|
|
(698,901
|
)
|
Earnings from Bluegreen Corporation
|
|
$
|
1,744
|
|
|
|
1,357
|
|
|
|
4,418
|
|
|
|
2,756
|
|
|
|
10,275
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
976
|
|
|
|
(58,087
|
)
|
|
|
(169,168
|
)
|
|
|
(8,341
|
)
|
|
|
(234,620
|
)
|
Earnings (loss) per share, basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
(14.36
|
)
|
|
|
(41.80
|
)
|
|
|
(0.43
|
)
|
|
|
(30.00
|
)
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
As previously reported, Woodbridge deconsolidated Levitt and
Sons from its consolidated statements of financial condition and
statements of operations as of November 9, 2007, which
resulted in the Company not recording results of operations
associated with Levitt and Sons after November 9, 2007. |
|
|
24.
|
Financial
Information of Levitt and Sons
|
As described in (Note 1) above, on November 9,
2007, the Debtors filed the Chapter 11 Cases. The Debtors
commenced the Chapter 11 Cases in order to preserve the
value of their assets and to facilitate an orderly wind-down of
their businesses and disposition of their assets in a manner
intended to maximize the recoveries of all constituents. In
connection with the filing of the Chapter 11 Cases,
Woodbridge deconsolidated Levitt and Sons as of November 9,
2007. As a result of the deconsolidation, Woodbridge had a
negative basis in its investment in Levitt and Sons because
Levitt and Sons generated significant losses and intercompany
liabilities in excess of its asset balances. This negative
investment, Loss in excess of investment in
subsidiary, is reflected as a single amount on the
Companys consolidated statements of financial condition as
a $55.2 million liability as of December 31, 2008 and
2007. This balance was comprised of a negative investment in
Levitt and Sons of $123.0 million, and outstanding advances
due to Woodbridge from Levitt and Sons of $67.8 million.
Included in the negative investment was approximately
$15.8 million associated with deferred revenue related to
intra-segment sales between Levitt and Sons and Core
Communities. During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company
identified approximately $2.3 million of deferred revenue
on intercompany sales between Core and Carolina Oak that had
been misclassified against the negative investment in Levitt and
Sons. As a result, the Company recorded a $2.3 million
reclassification between inventory of real estate and the loss
in excess of investment in subsidiary in the consolidated
statements of financial condition.
F-248
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As a result, as of December 31, 2008, the net negative
investment was $52.9 million. Woodbridges previously
reported consolidated statements of financial condition,
consolidated statements of operations and consolidated
statements of cash flows prior to November 9, 2007 continue
to include Levitt and Sons financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows. See Note 20 for further
information regarding the Chapter 11 Cases and Note 25
for the status of the Settlement Agreement.
Since Levitt and Sons results are no longer consolidated
with the Companys results, and the status Company believes
it is not probable that it will be obligated to fund further
losses related to its investment in Levitt and Sons, any
material uncertainties related to Levitt and Sons ongoing
operations are not expected to impact the Companys future
financial results other than in connection with the
Companys contractual obligations to third parties and
payment of the settlement amount.
The following table summarizes the assets, liabilities and net
equity of Levitt and Sons as of the deconsolidation date at
November 9, 2007, as well as the calculation of the loss in
excess of investment in subsidiary which was recorded on the
Companys consolidated statement of financial condition at
December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 9,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
6,387
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
356,294
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
1,681
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
8,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets deconsolidated
|
|
|
373,336
|
|
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
50,709
|
|
Customer deposits
|
|
|
18,007
|
|
Notes and mortgage payable
|
|
|
344,052
|
|
Due to Woodbridge
|
|
|
67,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities deconsolidated
|
|
$
|
480,599
|
|
Net equity/negative investment
|
|
$
|
(107,263
|
)
|
The loss in excess of investment in subsidiary is comprised
of:
|
|
|
|
|
Net equity/negative investment
|
|
|
(107,263
|
)
|
Due to Woodbridge
|
|
|
67,831
|
|
Deferred revenue(a)
|
|
|
(15,780
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(55,212
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
During the fourth quarter of 2008, deferred revenue was adjusted
by $2.3 million due to a reclassification on intercompany
land sales between Core and Carolina Oak that had been
inadvertently recorded against the negative investment. As a
result of this reclassification the net negative investment was
reduced from $55.2 million to $52.9 million as of
December 31, 2008. |
Included in the loss in excess of investment in subsidiary was
approximately $15.8 million associated with deferred
revenue related to intra-segment sales between Levitt and Sons
and Core Communities.
The following condensed consolidated financial statements of
Levitt and Sons were prepared in conformity with Statement of
Position
90-7,
Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under
the Bankruptcy Code
(SOP 90-7),
which requires that the liabilities subject to compromise by the
Bankruptcy Court are reported separately from the liabilities
not subject to compromise, and that all transactions directly
F-249
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
associated with the bankruptcy plan be reported separately as
well. Liabilities subject to compromise include pre-petition
unsecured claims that may be settled at amounts that differ from
those recorded in Levitt and Sons condensed consolidated
statements of financial condition.
Levitt
and Sons
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
As of
December 31, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
4,712
|
|
|
|
5,365
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
885
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
166,358
|
|
|
|
208,686
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
19,657
|
|
|
|
23,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
191,612
|
|
|
|
237,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
719
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
Due to Woodbridge
|
|
|
2,870
|
|
|
|
748
|
|
Liabilities subject to compromise(A)
|
|
|
327,707
|
|
|
|
354,748
|
|
Shareholders deficit
|
|
$
|
(139,684
|
)
|
|
|
(118,049
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
191,612
|
|
|
|
237,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A)
|
Liabilities
Subject to Compromise
|
Liabilities subject to compromise in Levitt and Sons
condensed consolidated statements of financial condition as of
December 31, 2008 refer to both secured and unsecured
obligations that will be accounted for under the bankruptcy
plan, including claims incurred prior to the Petition Date. They
represent the debtors current estimate of the amount of
known or potential pre-petition claims that are subject to
restructuring in the Chapter 11 Cases. Such claims remain
subject to future adjustments.
Liabilities subject to compromise at December 31, 2008 were
as follows, in thousands:
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
54,954
|
|
Customer deposits
|
|
|
15,754
|
|
Due to Woodbridge
|
|
|
87,182
|
|
Deficiency claim associated with secured debt
|
|
|
45,458
|
|
Notes and mortgage payable
|
|
|
124,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities subject to compromise
|
|
$
|
327,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-250
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Levitt
and Sons
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Years
Ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of real estate
|
|
$
|
32,505
|
|
|
|
397,561
|
|
|
|
500,719
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2,245
|
|
|
|
4,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
32,507
|
|
|
|
399,806
|
|
|
|
504,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales of real estate
|
|
|
42,864
|
|
|
|
562,763
|
|
|
|
440,059
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
4,340
|
|
|
|
70,848
|
|
|
|
77,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
47,204
|
|
|
|
633,611
|
|
|
|
517,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bankruptcy related items, net
|
|
|
(7,049
|
)
|
|
|
(3,525
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net of interest and other expense
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
(1,928
|
)
|
|
|
(560
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(21,635
|
)
|
|
|
(239,258
|
)
|
|
|
(13,688
|
)
|
(Provision) benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(303
|
)
|
|
|
4,749
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(21,635
|
)
|
|
|
(239,561
|
)
|
|
|
(8,939
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bankruptcy
of Levitt and Sons
On February 20, 2009, the Bankruptcy Court presiding over
Levitt and Sons Chapter 11 bankruptcy case entered an
order confirming a plan of liquidation jointly proposed by
Levitt and Sons and the Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors. That order also approved the settlement pursuant to
the Settlement Agreement, as amended. No appeal or rehearing of
the courts order was timely filed by any party, and the
settlement was consummated on March 3, 2009, at which time,
payment was made in accordance with the terms and conditions of
the Settlement Agreement, as amended. The cost of settlement and
reversal of the related $52.9 million liability will be
recognized into income in the first quarter of 2009.
Executive
Compensation Program
On September 29, 2008, the Companys Board of
Directors approved the terms of incentive programs for certain
of the Companys employees including certain of the
Companys named executive officers, pursuant to which a
portion of their compensation will be based on the cash returns
realized by the Company on its investments. The programs relate
to the performance of existing investments and new investments
designated by the Board (together, the Investments).
All of the Companys investments have been or will be held
by individual limited partnerships or other legal entities
established for such purpose. Participating executives and
employees will have interests in the entities which will be the
basis of their incentives under the programs. The Companys
named executive officers may have interests tied both to the
performance of a particular investment as well as interests
relating to the performance of the portfolio of investments as a
whole.
The Company, in its capacity as investor in the investment
program, will be entitled to receive a return of the
Companys invested capital and a specified rate of return
on its invested capital prior to the Companys executive
officers or employees being entitled to receive any portion of
the realized profits (the share to which
F-251
Woodbridge
Holdings Corporation
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
they may be entitled is referred to as the Carried
Interest). For existing investments, the amount of
invested capital was determined as of September 1, 2008, by
the Companys Board of Directors. Once the Company receives
its priority return of its invested capital and the stated
return (which accrues from September 1, 2008), the Company
will also generally be entitled to additional amounts that
provide it with (i) at least approximately 87% of the
aggregate proceeds related to the Companys status as an
investor in excess of the Companys invested capital in
that investment, plus (ii) at least 35% of all other
amounts earned from third parties with respect to that
investment (i.e., income not related to the Companys
status as an investor, such as management fees charged to third
parties). The remaining proceeds will be available under the
incentive programs for distribution among those employees
directly responsible for the relevant Investments and the
Companys executive officers. The compensation committee of
the Companys Board of Directors will determine the
allocations to the Companys named executive officers.
These allocations are identified in advance for each of the
executive officers. Although the compensation committee can
alter these allocations on a prospective basis, the total amount
payable to employees and officers cannot be changed. Management
will determine the amounts to be allocated among the other
employee participants. The incentive programs relating to both
individual investments and the program established for the
executive officers with respect to the overall performance of
the portfolio of investments contain clawback obligations that
are intended to reduce the risk that the participants will be
distributed amounts under the programs prior to the
Companys receipt of at least a return of its invested
capital and the stated return. To the extent that named
executive officers participate in the performance of a
particular investment, their clawback obligations nevertheless
refer to the performance of the portfolio as a whole. The
programs contemplate that the clawback obligations will be
funded solely from holdback accounts established with respect to
each participant. Amounts equal to a portion of Carried Interest
distribution to such participant (initially 25% and which can be
increased, when appropriate, to as high as 75%) will be
deposited into holdback accounts or otherwise made available for
the benefit of the Company. There are also general vesting and
forfeiture provisions applicable to each participants
right to receive any Carried Interest, the terms of which may
vary by individual. The Companys Board of Directors
believes that the above-described incentive plans appropriately
align payments to participants with the performance of our
Investments.
The Executive Incentive Plan which sets forth the
terms of the Carried Interests of certain executive officers in
the performance of the overall investments of the Company and
the Investment Programs entered into to date which
set forth the Carried Interests of employees and certain
executive officers in the performance of particular individual
investments are included as exhibits to the Companys
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008. Those documents
(rather than the general descriptions contained herein) embody
the legally binding terms of the incentive arrangements, which
were executed on March 13, 2009.
F-252
Schedule III
Woodbridge Holdings Corporation
Real Estate Investments and Accumulated Depreciation
As of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Building and
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Book
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciable
|
|
|
Acquisition/
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
Improvement
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Encumbrances
|
|
|
Lives (Years)
|
|
|
Completion
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Cypress Creek Office Bldg Ft. Laud.
|
|
$
|
2,250
|
|
|
$
|
13,355
|
|
|
$
|
15,605
|
|
|
$
|
(1,892
|
)
|
|
$
|
13,713
|
|
|
$
|
11,831
|
|
|
|
S/L 30
|
|
|
October 2004
|
The Village Center Port St. Lucie
|
|
|
1,449
|
|
|
|
19,011
|
|
|
|
20,460
|
|
|
|
(2,900
|
)
|
|
|
17,560
|
|
|
|
14,381
|
|
|
|
S/L 39
|
|
|
February 2005
|
The Landing Port St. Lucie
|
|
|
5,988
|
|
|
|
55,060
|
|
|
|
61,048
|
|
|
|
(1,950
|
)
|
|
|
59,098
|
|
|
|
60,624
|
|
|
|
S/L 39
|
|
|
November 2007
|
|
|
$
|
9,687
|
|
|
$
|
87,426
|
|
|
$
|
97,113
|
|
|
$
|
(6,742
|
)
|
|
$
|
90,371
|
|
|
$
|
86,836
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the changes of the Companys
real estate investments for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
$
|
101,185
|
|
|
|
40,562
|
|
|
|
36,897
|
|
Improvements
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
60,623
|
|
|
|
6,898
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
(2,675
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,233
|
)
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
(1,745
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
$
|
97,113
|
|
|
|
101,185
|
|
|
|
40,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The adjustments of approximately $1.7 million reflected in
the year ended December 31, 2008 relate to tenant
reimbursements received from improvements made on the behalf of
the tenants in The Landing property during the normal
construction of the property.
The unaudited aggregate cost of real estate investments for
federal income tax purposes as of December 31, 2008 was
approximately $92.1 million.
The following table presents the changes of the Companys
real estate investments accumulated depreciation for the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
$
|
(3,065
|
)
|
|
|
(1,942
|
)
|
|
|
(732
|
)
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
(3,677
|
)
|
|
|
(1,123
|
)
|
|
|
(1,210
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
$
|
(6,742
|
)
|
|
|
(3,065
|
)
|
|
|
(1,942
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Note 9 to our audited consolidated financial statements
for further disclosure on the real estate investment and
accumulated depreciation tables above.
F-253
Annex A
AGREEMENT
AND PLAN OF MERGER
by and among
BFC FINANCIAL CORPORATION,
WDG MERGER SUB, LLC
and
WOODBRIDGE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
DEFINITIONS
|
|
|
A-1
|
|
THE MERGER
|
|
|
A-6
|
|
Merger
|
|
|
A-6
|
|
Consummation of the Merger; Effective Time
|
|
|
A-6
|
|
Effect of the Merger
|
|
|
A-6
|
|
Articles of Organization and Operating Agreement
|
|
|
A-6
|
|
Board of Managers
|
|
|
A-6
|
|
Officers
|
|
|
A-6
|
|
Additional Actions
|
|
|
A-6
|
|
CONVERSION OF SHARES; CONSIDERATION
|
|
|
A-7
|
|
Merger Consideration
|
|
|
A-7
|
|
Exchange of Certificates
|
|
|
A-7
|
|
Stock Transfer Books
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Woodbridge Options and Restricted Stock
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
Appraisal Rights
|
|
|
A-9
|
|
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF BFC AND MERGER SUB
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
Organization; Good Standing; Power
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
Capitalization
|
|
|
A-10
|
|
Authorization; No Violation
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
A-11
|
|
Exchange Act Reports; Financial Statements
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
Absence of Certain Changes
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
Taxes
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
BFC Material Contracts
|
|
|
A-12
|
|
Investigations; Litigation
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
Compliance with Laws
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
Labor Matters
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
Employee Benefit Plans
|
|
|
A-13
|
|
Related Party Transactions
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
Brokers and Finders Fees
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
Registration Statement; Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
Tax Treatment
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
Opinion of Financial Advisor
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
Sarbanes-Oxley
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
Certain Business Practices
|
|
|
A-14
|
|
Operations of Merger Sub
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
Full Disclosure
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF WOODBRIDGE
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
Organization; Good Standing; Power
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
Capitalization
|
|
|
A-15
|
|
Authorization; No Violation
|
|
|
A-16
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
A-17
|
|
Exchange Act Reports; Financial Statements
|
|
|
A-17
|
|
Annex A-i
|
|
|
|
|
Absence of Certain Changes
|
|
|
A-17
|
|
Taxes
|
|
|
A-18
|
|
Investigations, Litigation
|
|
|
A-18
|
|
Woodbridge Material Contracts
|
|
|
A-18
|
|
Brokers and Finders Fees
|
|
|
A-18
|
|
Registration Statement; Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
State Takeover Laws
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
Opinion of Financial Advisor
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
Tax Treatment
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
Full Disclosure
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
CONDUCT OF BUSINESS PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE TIME
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
Conduct of Business by Woodbridge
|
|
|
A-19
|
|
Conduct of Business by BFC
|
|
|
A-20
|
|
Notice
|
|
|
A-20
|
|
ADDITIONAL COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
Access to Information
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
Public Announcements
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
Reasonable Efforts
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
No Solicitation
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
Shareholder Meetings
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
Registration Statement; Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
Employee Benefit Plans
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
Indemnification
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
Further Assurances
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
Tax Treatment
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
Comfort Letters
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
Shareholder Litigation
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
HSR Act
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
Appointment of Directors and Executive Officer
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
Cancellation of Woodbridge Options
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
Cancellation of Woodbridge Rights Agreement
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO OBLIGATIONS
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
Conditions to Each Partys Obligation to Effect the Merger
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
Conditions to Woodbridges Obligation to Effect the Merger
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
Conditions to BFCs and Merger Subs Obligation to
Effect the Merger
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
TERMINATION, AMENDMENT AND WAIVER
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
Termination of the Agreement
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
Effect of Termination
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
Amendment and Waiver
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
MISCELLANEOUS
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
Survival of the Representations and Warranties
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
Payment of Expenses
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
Binding Effect
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
Governing Law
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
Counterparts
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
Annex A-ii
|
|
|
|
|
Notices
|
|
|
A-31
|
|
Entire Agreement; Assignment
|
|
|
A-31
|
|
Headings
|
|
|
A-31
|
|
Knowledge of the Parties
|
|
|
A-31
|
|
Attorneys Fees
|
|
|
A-32
|
|
No Third Party Beneficiary
|
|
|
A-32
|
|
Injunctive Relief
|
|
|
A-32
|
|
Jurisdiction; Venue
|
|
|
A-32
|
|
Severability
|
|
|
A-32
|
|
Waiver
|
|
|
A-32
|
|
Special Committee
|
|
|
A-32
|
|
Time of the Essence
|
|
|
A-32
|
|
Annex A-iii
AGREEMENT
AND PLAN OF MERGER
THIS AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER (this
Agreement) is entered into as of the
2nd day
of July, 2009, by and among BFC FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a Florida
corporation (BFC), WDG MERGER SUB, LLC, a
Florida limited liability company and a wholly-owned subsidiary
of BFC (Merger Sub), and WOODBRIDGE HOLDINGS
CORPORATION, a Florida corporation
(Woodbridge).
W
I T N E S S E
T H:
WHEREAS, BFC has proposed a business combination with Woodbridge
pursuant to which Woodbridge will merge with and into Merger
Sub, with Merger Sub to be the surviving company in the merger
(the Merger);
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Woodbridge has designated a
special committee composed of independent members of such Board
of Directors (the Special Committee) to,
among other things, review and evaluate the terms and
conditions, and determine the advisability, of the Merger;
WHEREAS, the Special Committee has negotiated the terms and
conditions of this Agreement on behalf of Woodbridge and has
(i) determined that the Merger is advisable, fair to, and
in the best interests of Woodbridges shareholders and
(ii) recommended the approval and adoption of this
Agreement by the Board of Directors of Woodbridge;
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Woodbridge has, based upon
the recommendation of the Special Committee, (i) determined
that the Merger is advisable, fair to, and in the best interests
of Woodbridges shareholders, (ii) approved and
adopted this Agreement and declared its advisability and
approved the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by
this Agreement and (iii) recommended the approval and
adoption of this Agreement by Woodbridges shareholders in
accordance with this Agreement;
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of BFC has determined that the
Merger is consistent with and in furtherance of the long-term
business strategy of BFC and fair to, and in the best interests
of, BFC and its shareholders and has approved and adopted this
Agreement, the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by
this Agreement;
WHEREAS, it is intended that the Merger qualify as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
Code); and
WHEREAS, BFC, Merger Sub and Woodbridge desire to make certain
representations, warranties, covenants and agreements in
connection with the Merger and to also set forth certain
conditions to the Merger;
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises and the
mutual agreements, representations, warranties and covenants
herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and
for the purpose of prescribing the terms and conditions of the
Merger, the parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree
as follows:
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS
When used in this Agreement, and in addition to the other terms
defined herein, the following terms shall have the meanings
specified:
Acquisition Proposal shall have the meaning
set forth in Section 7.4(a).
Affiliate shall mean with respect to any
Person, any other Person that directly, or indirectly through
one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by or is
under common control with the Person specified. For purposes of
this definition, control of a Person means the power, direct or
indirect, to direct or cause the direction of the management and
policies of such Person whether though the ownership of voting
securities,
Annex A-1
by contract or otherwise; provided, however, that for purposes
of this Agreement, Woodbridge and its Subsidiaries shall not be
treated as an Affiliate of BFC, and BFC and BankAtlantic
Bancorp, Inc. shall not be treated as Affiliates of Woodbridge.
Agreement means this Agreement and Plan of
Merger as executed on the date hereof and as amended and
supplemented in accordance with its terms, including all
Schedules and Exhibits.
Articles of Merger shall mean the articles of
merger with respect to the Merger to be filed with the Secretary
of State of the State of Florida.
BFC shall have the meaning set forth in the
Preamble.
BFC Capital Stock shall have the meaning set
forth in Section 4.2(a).
BFC Class B Common Stock shall mean the
Class B Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of BFC.
BFC Class A Common Stock shall mean the
Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of BFC.
BFC Financial Statements shall mean the
audited Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition,
Consolidated Statements of Operations, Consolidated Statements
of Comprehensive Income, Consolidated Statements of
Shareholders Equity and Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows of BFC, and the related notes thereto, for each of
BFCs fiscal years ended on December 31, 2006, 2007
and 2008, and the unaudited Consolidated Statements of Financial
Condition, Consolidated Statements of Operations, Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income, Consolidated Statements of
Shareholders Equity and Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows of BFC, and the related notes thereto, for the three-month
period ended March 31, 2009, as each of which is included
in the BFC SEC Reports.
BFC Leased Real Property shall mean all real
property leased by BFC (including all leasehold or subleasehold
estates and other rights to use or occupy any land, buildings
(including sales kiosks) and improvements thereon).
BFC Material Contract shall mean any
material contract (as such term is defined in
Item 601(b)(10) of
Regulation S-K
of the SEC) to which BFC or any of its Subsidiaries is a party
or otherwise relating to or affecting any of their respective
assets, properties or operations.
BFC Options shall mean all options or
warrants granted by BFC to purchase shares of BFC Class A
Common Stock or BFC Class B Common Stock which are
outstanding and unexercised immediately prior to the Effective
Time.
BFC Option Plans shall mean (i) the BFC
Financial Corporation Stock Option Plan and (ii) the BFC
Financial Corporation 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended.
BFC Owned Real Property shall mean all real
property owned by BFC (including all land, interests in
buildings, structures, improvements and fixtures located thereon
and all easements and other rights and interests appurtenant
thereto owned by BFC).
BFC Plans shall mean all employee benefit
plans and all bonus, stock option, stock purchase, restricted
stock, incentive, deferred compensation, retiree medical or life
insurance, supplemental retirement, severance or other benefit
plans, programs or arrangements, and all employment,
termination, severance or other contracts or agreements, whether
legally enforceable or not, to which BFC is a party, with
respect to which BFC has any obligation or which are maintained,
contributed to or sponsored by BFC for the benefit of any
current or former employee, officer or director of BFC.
BFC SEC Reports shall have the meaning set
forth in Section 4.5(a).
BFC Special Meeting shall mean the special
meeting of BFCs shareholders to be held for the purpose of
approving the transactions contemplated hereby.
BFC Stock Certificate(s) shall have the
meaning set forth in Section 3.2(a).
Annex A-2
Business Day means any day on which banks are
not required or authorized by Law or executive order to close in
the city of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA.
Claim shall have the meaning set forth in
Section 7.8.
Closing shall have the meaning set forth in
Section 2.2.
Closing Date shall have the meaning set forth
in Section 2.2.
Code shall have the meaning set forth in the
Recitals.
Controlled Group shall mean a controlled
group of organizations (within the meaning of
Sections 414(b), (c), (m) or (o) of the Code).
Dissenting Shares shall have the meaning set
forth in Section 3.5.
Effective Time shall have the meaning set
forth in Section 2.2.
ERISA shall mean the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974, as amended from time to time, and
the rules and regulations thereunder.
Exchange Act shall mean the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, together with the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder.
Exchange Agent shall have the meaning set
forth in Section 3.2(a).
Exchange Fund shall have the meaning set
forth in Section 3.2(a).
Exchange Ratio shall have the meaning set
forth in Section 3.1(c).
FBCA shall mean the Florida Business
Corporation Act.
GAAP shall mean United States generally
accepted accounting principles, consistently applied during the
periods presented in accordance with past practices.
Governmental Entity shall mean any federal,
state, local or foreign court, tribunal, arbitral body,
administrative agency or commission or other governmental or
regulatory authority or administrative agency or commission.
HSR Act shall mean the
Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and the rules
and regulations thereunder.
Indemnified Liabilities shall have the
meaning set forth in Section 7.8.
Indemnified Parties shall have the meaning
set forth in Section 7.8.
Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus shall have
the meaning set forth in Section 4.16.
Law shall mean any federal, state or local
governmental law, rule, regulation or requirement, including any
rules, regulations and Orders promulgated thereunder and any
Orders, decrees, consents or judgments of any Governmental
Entity and courts having the force of law.
Letter of Transmittal shall have the meaning
set forth in Section 3.2(b).
Lien shall mean any lien, charge, pledge,
security interest, mortgage, claim, encumbrance, option, right
of first refusal and other proscription, restriction, condition,
covenant or similar right whether imposed by law, by contract or
otherwise.
Material Adverse Effect shall mean any
effect, change, event, state of fact, development, circumstance
or condition (including changes in banking, thrift or similar
laws, rules or regulations) which when considered individually
or in the aggregate with all other effects, changes, events,
state of facts, developments, circumstances or conditions has
materially and adversely affected or could reasonably be
expected to materially and adversely affect (i) the results
of operations, financial condition, assets, liabilities, or
business of BFC or Woodbridge, as the case may be, in each case
including its respective Subsidiaries together with it
Annex A-3
taken as a whole, including the ability of the parties to
consummate the Merger
and/or any
of the other transactions contemplated hereby; provided,
however, that a Material Adverse Effect shall
not be deemed to include (x) any changes resulting from
general economic or political conditions, (y) circumstances
that affect the industries in which Woodbridge or BFC, as the
case may be, operate or (z) force majeure events, acts of
terrorism or acts of war; and provided, further, that,
notwithstanding the foregoing, the changes or events described
in clauses (x) through (z) above shall be regarded in
determining whether a Material Adverse Effect has occurred if
the effects of such changes or events disproportionately impact
or uniquely relate to BFC or Woodbridge, as applicable.
Merger Consideration shall have the meaning
set forth in Section 3.2(c).
Merger Sub shall have the meaning set forth
in the Preamble.
Merger shall have the meaning set forth in
the Recitals.
Order shall mean any judgment, ruling, order,
writ, injunction, decree, consent decree, statute, rule or
regulation.
OSHA shall mean the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of 1970, as amended from time to time, and the rules
and regulations issued thereunder.
PBGC shall mean the Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
Permits shall mean all permits, licenses,
variances, registrations, certificates of authority, Orders and
approvals of Governmental Entities.
Permitted Liens shall mean (i) statutory
Liens imposed by Law for Taxes that are not yet due and payable,
or are being contested in good faith by proper proceedings and
which have been adequately reserved for in accordance with GAAP
on the Woodbridge Financial Statements or BFC Financial
Statements, as applicable; (ii) Liens which are purchase
money Liens arising in the ordinary course of business for
amounts which are not in default; (iii) carriers,
warehousemens, mechanics, landlords,
materialmens, repairmens or other substantially
similar Liens arising under Law for amounts not yet due and
payable; (iv) easements,
rights-of-way
and other similar instruments whether or not recorded in the
public land records or filed in other public records and which
do not, individually or in the aggregate, interfere with the use
or marketability of the relevant asset; (v) zoning,
subdivision and other applicable Laws; and (vi) amendments,
extensions, renewals or replacements of any Lien referred to in
clauses (i) through (v) above, to the extent that the
scope, duration and effect of the Lien so amended, extended,
renewed or replaced remains the same in all material respects.
Person shall mean a natural person,
corporation, limited liability company, association, joint stock
company, trust, partnership, governmental entity, agency or
branch or department thereof, or any other legal entity.
Pink Sheets shall mean the Pink Sheets
Electronic Quotation Service.
Plan shall mean, with respect to any Person,
any employee benefit plan (within the meaning of
Section 3(3) of ERISA), stock purchase plan, stock option
plan, fringe benefit plan, bonus plan and any other deferred
compensation agreement or plan or funding arrangement sponsored,
maintained or to which contributions are made by: (i) such
Person or any of its Subsidiaries or (ii) any other
organization which is a member of a Controlled Group of which
such Person or any of its Subsidiaries is a member or with
respect to which such Person or any of its Subsidiaries or any
member of the Controlled Group of which such Person or any of
its Subsidiaries has any liability or potential liability.
Registration Statement shall have the meaning
set forth in Section 4.16.
SEC means the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission.
Securities Act shall mean the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, together with the rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder.
Special Committee shall have the meaning set
forth in the Recitals.
Annex A-4
Subsidiary or Subsidiaries
of any Person shall mean any corporation, limited liability
company, partnership, joint venture or other legal entity of
which such Person, directly or indirectly (either alone or
through or together with any other Subsidiary of such Person)
owns more than fifty percent (50%) of the stock or other equity
interests, the holders of which are generally entitled to vote
for the election of the board of directors, other governing body
or manager of such corporation or other legal entity; provided,
however, that for purposes of this Agreement, Woodbridge shall
not be treated as a Subsidiary of BFC.
Superior Proposal shall have the meaning set
forth in Section 7.4(b).
Surviving Company shall have the meaning set
forth in Section 2.1.
Tax or Taxes shall mean
any and all taxes, fees, levies, duties, tariffs, imposts, and
other charges of any kind (together with any and all interest,
penalties, additions to tax and additional amounts imposed with
respect thereto) imposed by any government or taxing authority,
including, without limitation, taxes or other charges on or with
respect to income, franchises, windfall or other profits, gross
receipts, property, sales, use, capital stock, payroll,
employment, social security, workers compensation,
unemployment compensation, or net worth, taxes or other charges
in the nature of excise, withholding, ad valorem, stamp,
transfer, value added, or gains taxes; license, registration and
documentation fees; and customs duties, tariffs, and
similar charges.
Third Party shall have the meaning set forth
in Section 7.4(b).
Woodbridge shall have the meaning set forth
in the Preamble.
Woodbridge Class A Common Stock shall
mean the Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share,
of Woodbridge.
Woodbridge Class B Common Stock shall
mean the Class B Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share,
of Woodbridge.
Woodbridge Financial Statements shall mean
the audited Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition,
Consolidated Statements of Income, Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income, Consolidated Statements of
Shareholders Equity and Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows of Woodbridge, and the related notes thereto, for each of
Woodbridges fiscal years ended on December 31, 2006,
2007 and 2008, and the unaudited Consolidated Statements of
Financial Condition, Consolidated Statements of Operations,
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, Consolidated
Statements of Shareholders Equity and Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows of Woodbridge, and the related notes
thereto, for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009,
as each of which is included in the Woodbridge SEC Reports.
Woodbridge Material Contract shall mean any
material contract (as such term is defined in
Item 601(b)(10) of
Regulation S-K
of the SEC) to which Woodbridge or any of its Subsidiaries is a
party or otherwise relating to or affecting any of their
respective assets, properties or operations as well as any
contract, agreement or other arrangement pursuant to which
Woodbridge or any of its Subsidiaries has incurred indebtedness
in an amount equal to or exceeding $25 million.
Woodbridge Options shall mean all options or
warrants granted by Woodbridge to purchase shares of Woodbridge
Class A Common Stock which are outstanding and unexercised
immediately prior to the Effective Time.
Woodbridge Option Plan shall mean the
Woodbridge Holdings Corporation 2003 Stock Incentive Plan, as
amended and restated.
Woodbridge Rights Agreement shall mean the
Rights Agreement, dated as of September 29, 2008, between
Woodbridge Holdings Corporation and American Stock Transfer and
Trust Company, as Rights Agent.
Woodbridge SEC Reports shall have the meaning
set forth in Section 5.5(a).
Woodbridge Meeting shall mean the annual or
special meeting of Woodbridges shareholders to be held for
the purpose of voting upon this Agreement and for no other
purpose without the prior written consent of BFC; provided,
however, that in the event the Woodbridge Meeting is the
annual meeting of Woodbridges
Annex A-5
shareholders, then the election of directors to the Board of
Directors of Woodbridge may be acted upon at the meeting without
the prior written consent of BFC.
Woodbridge Stock Certificate(s) shall have
the meaning set forth in Section 3.2(a).
ARTICLE II
THE
MERGER
2.1 Merger. At the Effective
Time, Woodbridge shall be merged with and into Merger Sub, and
Merger Sub will be the surviving company of the Merger (the
Surviving Company), in accordance with the
terms, conditions and provisions of this Agreement and the
Articles of Merger.
2.2 Consummation of the Merger; Effective
Time. The consummation of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement (the Closing)
shall take place at the offices of Stearns Weaver Miller
Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson, P.A., 150 West
Flagler Street, Miami, Florida 33130, at such time as shall be
fixed by mutual agreement of BFC and Woodbridge as promptly as
practicable after the satisfaction or waiver of all of the
conditions set forth in this Agreement (the date of Closing is
hereinafter sometimes referred to as the Closing
Date). On or prior to the day before the Closing Date,
Woodbridge and Merger Sub will each execute the Articles of
Merger and deliver it to Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler
Alhadeff & Sitterson, P.A. for filing with the
Secretary of State of the State of Florida. Subject to the
satisfaction or waiver of all conditions precedent to the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement,
the parties shall cause the Merger to become effective on the
date of the Closing by (i) causing the filing, in
accordance with all applicable regulations, of the Articles of
Merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Florida and
(ii) causing all other documents which must be recorded or
filed as a result of the Merger to be recorded or filed. The
Articles of Merger shall provide that the Merger shall be
effective as of 5:00 p.m. on the date of Closing (the date
and time of such effectiveness being referred to herein as the
Effective Time). The Closing shall be deemed
to occur simultaneously with the Effective Time.
2.3 Effect of the Merger. At
the Effective Time, the effect of the Merger shall be as
provided in the applicable provisions of the Articles of Merger
and the FBCA. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing,
and subject thereto, at the Effective Time, all of the property,
rights, privileges, powers and franchises of Woodbridge and
Merger Sub shall vest in the Surviving Company, and all debts,
liabilities and duties of Woodbridge and Merger Sub shall become
the debts, liabilities and duties of the Surviving Company.
2.4 Articles of Organization and Operating
Agreement. The Articles of Organization of
Merger Sub as in effect immediately prior to the Merger shall be
the Articles of Organization of the Surviving Company, and the
Operating Agreement of Merger Sub as in effect immediately prior
to the Merger shall be the Operating Agreement of the Surviving
Company, in each case until thereafter altered, amended or
repealed in accordance with applicable law.
2.5 Board of Managers. As of
the Effective Time, the Board of Managers of the Surviving
Company will consist of the managers serving on the Board of
Managers of Merger Sub immediately prior to the Effective Time.
2.6 Officers. As of the
Effective Time, the officers of Woodbridge immediately prior to
the Effective Time shall constitute the officers of the
Surviving Company until such time as their respective successors
have been duly elected and qualified.
2.7 Additional Actions. If,
at any time after the Effective Time, BFC or the Surviving
Company shall consider or be advised that, consistent with the
terms of this Agreement, any further assignments or assurances
in law or any other acts are necessary or desirable (a) to
vest, perfect or confirm, of record or otherwise, in the
Surviving Company, title to and possession of any property or
right of either Woodbridge or Merger Sub acquired or to be
acquired by reason of, or as a result of, the Merger, or
(b) to otherwise carry out the purposes of this Agreement,
then, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement,
each of Woodbridge and its officers and directors and Merger Sub
and its officers and managers shall be deemed to have granted to
the Surviving Company an irrevocable power of attorney to
execute and deliver all such deeds, assignments
Annex A-6
and assurances in law and to do all acts necessary or proper to
vest, perfect or confirm title to and possession of such
property or rights in the Surviving Company and otherwise to
carry out the purposes of this Agreement; and the officers and
managers of the Surviving Company are fully authorized in the
name of either Woodbridge or Merger Sub to take any and all such
actions.
ARTICLE III
CONVERSION
OF SHARES; CONSIDERATION
3.1 Merger Consideration. At
the Effective Time, by virtue of the Merger and without any
action on the part of BFC, Merger Sub, Woodbridge or the holders
of any of the following securities:
(a) 100% of the membership interests in Merger Sub issued
and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall
remain issued and outstanding and unchanged following the
Effective Time and constitute 100% of the membership interests
in the Surviving Company.
(b) Each share of Woodbridge Class A Common Stock and
Woodbridge Class B Common Stock owned by BFC, Merger Sub or
Woodbridge (in each case other than in a fiduciary capacity or
as a result of debts previously contracted), immediately prior
to the Effective Time shall be canceled and extinguished without
any conversion thereof and no stock of BFC, cash or other
consideration shall be delivered in exchange therefor; it being
understood that BFC is the sole holder of shares of Woodbridge
Class B Common Stock and all of such shares shall be
canceled pursuant to this Section 3.1(b).
(c) Subject to the other provisions of this
Section 3.1, each share of Woodbridge Class A
Common Stock that is issued and outstanding immediately prior to
the Effective Time (excluding any shares of Woodbridge
Class A Common Stock canceled pursuant to
Section 3.1(b) and excluding Dissenting Shares)
shall by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part
of the holder thereof become and be converted into the right to
receive 3.47 shares of BFC Class A Common Stock (such
ratio of shares of BFC Class A Common Stock to shares of
Woodbridge Class A Common Stock being referred to as the
Exchange Ratio). Fractional shares of BFC
Class A Common Stock will not be issued in connection with
the Merger. Rather, the aggregate number of shares of BFC
Class A Common Stock to which a holder of Woodbridge
Class A Common Stock shall be entitled to receive as a
result of the Merger will be rounded up to the next whole
number. In furtherance of the foregoing, if more than one
Woodbridge Stock Certificate shall be surrendered for the
account of the same holder, the number of shares of BFC
Class A Common Stock to be issued to such holder in
exchange for the Woodbridge Stock Certificates which have been
surrendered shall be computed on the basis of the aggregate
number of shares represented by all of the Woodbridge Stock
Certificates surrendered for the account of such holder.
(d) At the Effective Time, holders of Woodbridge
Class A Common Stock and Woodbridge Class B Common
Stock shall cease to be, and shall have no rights as,
shareholders of Woodbridge, and Woodbridge Stock Certificates
shall thereafter represent only the right to receive the
consideration provided under this Article III.
(e) If between the date of this Agreement and the Effective
Time the outstanding shares of BFC Class A Common Stock or
Woodbridge Class A Common Stock are changed into a
different number of shares by reason of a reorganization,
reclassification, recapitalization, division, combination or
exchange of shares, or any dividend or other distribution
payable in stock or other securities is declared with regard to
the BFC Class A Common Stock or Woodbridge Class A
Common Stock with a record date between the date of this
Agreement and the Effective Time, the Merger Consideration will
be adjusted to provide the holders of Woodbridge Class A
Common Stock the same economic effect as that contemplated by
this Agreement if the reorganization, reclassification,
recapitalization, division, combination, exchange, dividend or
other distribution had not taken place.
3.2 Exchange of Certificates.
(a) At or prior to the Effective Time, BFC shall deposit,
or shall cause to be deposited, with American Stock Transfer and
Trust Company, or such other bank or trust company
designated by BFC and who is
Annex A-7
reasonably satisfactory to Woodbridge (the Exchange
Agent) for the benefit of the holders of certificates
representing the shares of Woodbridge Class A Common Stock
(Woodbridge Stock Certificates) for exchange
in accordance with this Article III through the
Exchange Agent, certificates representing the shares of BFC
Class A Common Stock (BFC Stock
Certificates) issuable pursuant to
Section 3.1(c) above (such BFC Stock Certificates,
together with any dividends or distributions with respect
thereto (without any interest thereon), being hereinafter
referred to as the Exchange Fund) to be
exchanged pursuant to this Article III for
outstanding Woodbridge Stock Certificates. The Exchange Fund
shall not be used for any other purpose.
(b) Promptly, but in any event no later than three
(3) Business Days after the Effective Time, BFC will
instruct the Exchange Agent to mail to each holder of record of
Woodbridge Class A Common Stock who has not previously
surrendered his, her or its Woodbridge Stock Certificates (other
than holders of any shares of Woodbridge Class A Common
Stock cancelled pursuant to Section 3.1(b) or
holders of Dissenting Shares): (1) a letter of transmittal
reasonably acceptable to Woodbridge (which shall specify that
delivery shall be effected, and risk of loss and title to such
holders Woodbridge Stock Certificates shall pass, only
upon proper delivery of the Woodbridge Stock Certificates to the
Exchange Agent and shall be in such form and have such other
provisions as to which BFC and Woodbridge may agree) and
(2) instructions reasonably acceptable to Woodbridge for
use in effecting the surrender of the Woodbridge Stock
Certificates in exchange for BFC Stock Certificates in
accordance with this Article III (collectively, the
Letter of Transmittal).
(c) From and after the Effective Time and upon the
surrender of a Woodbridge Stock Certificate for cancellation (or
affidavits and indemnification regarding the loss or destruction
of such certificates reasonably acceptable to BFC and the
Exchange Agent) to the Exchange Agent together with the Letter
of Transmittal, duly executed, and such other customary
documents as may be required pursuant thereto, the holder of
such Woodbridge Stock Certificate shall be entitled to receive
in exchange therefor, and the Exchange Agent shall deliver in
accordance with the Letter of Transmittal, BFC Stock
Certificates representing that number of whole shares of BFC
Class A Common Stock which such holder has the right to
receive in respect of the shares of Woodbridge Class A
Common Stock formerly evidenced by such Woodbridge Stock
Certificate in accordance with Section 3.1 (such
shares of BFC Class A Common Stock, the Merger
Consideration), and the Woodbridge Stock Certificate
so surrendered shall forthwith be canceled. In the event of a
transfer of ownership of shares of Woodbridge Class A
Common Stock which is not registered in the transfer records of
Woodbridge, a certificate evidencing the proper number of shares
of BFC Class A Common Stock may be issued in accordance
with this Article III to a transferee if the
Woodbridge Stock Certificate evidencing such shares is presented
to the Exchange Agent, accompanied by all documents reasonably
required to evidence and effect such transfer and by evidence
reasonably acceptable to BFC and the Exchange Agent that any
applicable stock transfer taxes have been paid. Until
surrendered as contemplated by this Section 3.2,
each Woodbridge Stock Certificate shall be deemed at any time
after the Effective Time to evidence only the right to receive
upon such surrender the Merger Consideration and any dividends
or other distributions declared or paid thereon after the
Effective Time.
(d) All shares of BFC Class A Common Stock issued upon
the surrender for exchange of Woodbridge Stock Certificates in
accordance with the terms of this Article III shall
be deemed to have been issued and paid, respectively, in full
satisfaction of all rights pertaining to the shares of
Woodbridge Class A Common Stock theretofore represented by
such Woodbridge Stock Certificates.
(e) Any portion of the Exchange Fund which remains
undistributed to the holders of the Woodbridge Stock
Certificates upon the date that is nine (9) months after
the Effective Time shall be delivered by the Exchange/ Agent to
BFC and any holders of Woodbridge Stock Certificates who have
not theretofore complied with this Article III shall
thereafter look only to BFC for the Merger Consideration.
(f) None of BFC, Woodbridge, Merger Sub or the Exchange
Agent shall be liable to any Person in respect of any shares of
BFC Class A Common Stock delivered to a public official
pursuant to any applicable abandoned property, escheat or
similar law. If any Woodbridge Stock Certificate shall not have
been surrendered prior to the date that is seven (7) years
after the Effective Time (or immediately prior to such earlier
date on which any Merger Consideration would otherwise escheat
to, or become the property of, any
Annex A-8
Governmental Entity), any such Merger Consideration shall, to
the extent permitted by applicable Law, become the property of
BFC, free and clear of all claims or interest of any person
previously entitled thereto.
(g) If any Woodbridge Stock Certificate shall have been
lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the making of a customary
affidavit of that fact by the Person claiming such Woodbridge
Stock Certificate to be lost, stolen or destroyed and, if
requested by BFC, the posting by such Person of a bond in such
reasonable amount as BFC may direct as indemnity against any
claim that may be made with respect to such Woodbridge Stock
Certificate, the Exchange Agent will issue in exchange for such
lost, stolen or destroyed Woodbridge Stock Certificate the
Merger Consideration, pursuant to this Article III.
3.3 Stock Transfer
Books. After the Effective Time, there shall
be no further registration of transfers on the stock transfer
books of Woodbridge or the Surviving Company of the shares of
Woodbridge Class A Common Stock or Woodbridge Class B
Common Stock which were outstanding immediately prior to the
Effective Time. If, after the Effective Time, Woodbridge Stock
Certificates are presented to the Surviving Company or the
Exchange Agent for any reason, they shall be canceled and,
subject to the provisions of this Article III,
exchanged for the Merger Consideration as provided in this
Article III, except as otherwise required by Law.
3.4 Woodbridge Options and Restricted
Stock.
(a) At the Effective Time, all outstanding Woodbridge
Options issued under the Woodbridge Option Plan will be
canceled; however, the Woodbridge Option Plan shall be assumed
by BFC and all restricted stock awards issued under the
Woodbridge Option Plan outstanding at the Effective Time, if
any, will be converted into the right to receive restricted
stock awards in the form of shares of BFC Class A Common
Stock, to be adjusted as provided in Section 3.4(b).
(b) The number of shares of BFC Class A Common Stock
to be subject to each new restricted stock award shall be equal
to the product of (i) the number of shares of Woodbridge
Class A Common Stock subject to the original Woodbridge
restricted stock award immediately prior to the Effective Time
and (ii) the Exchange Ratio.
(c) In effecting such assumption and conversion, the
aggregate number of shares of BFC Class A Common Stock to
be subject to each assumed Woodbridge restricted stock award
will be rounded up, if necessary, to the next whole share.
(d) If any restricted stock awards issued under the
Woodbridge Option Plan are outstanding at the Effective Time
and, accordingly, are converted into the right to receive
restricted stock awards in the form of shares of BFC
Class A Common Stock in connection with the Merger, then,
as soon as practicable after the Effective Time, but in no event
later than thirty (30) days after the Effective Time, BFC
shall file a Registration Statement on
Form S-8
(or any successor or other appropriate form) with respect to the
shares of BFC Class A Common Stock underlying the assumed
Woodbridge restricted stock awards, and BFC will use its
reasonable efforts to maintain the effectiveness of such
registration statement (and the current status of the prospectus
or prospectuses contained therein) for so long as any such
assumed Woodbridge restricted stock awards remain outstanding
under the Woodbridge Option Plan to be assumed by BFC.
3.5 Appraisal
Rights. Notwithstanding anything in this
Agreement to the contrary and unless otherwise provided by
applicable law, each share of Woodbridge Class A Common
Stock which is issued and outstanding immediately prior to the
Effective Time and which is owned by a shareholder who, pursuant
to Section 607.1301, et seq., of the FBCA duly and
validly exercises and perfects his, her or its appraisal rights
with respect to his, her or its shares (the Dissenting
Shares), shall not be converted into the right to
receive, or be exchangeable for, the Merger Consideration, but,
instead, the holder thereof shall be entitled to payment in cash
from the Surviving Company of the appraised value of such
Dissenting Shares in accordance with the provisions of
Section 607.1301, et. seq., of the FBCA. If any such
holder shall have failed to duly and validly exercise or perfect
or shall have effectively withdrawn or lost such appraisal
rights, each share of Woodbridge Class A Common Stock of
such holder shall not be deemed a Dissenting Share and shall
automatically be converted into and shall thereafter be
exchangeable only for the right to receive the Merger
Consideration as provided in this Agreement.
Annex A-9
ARTICLE IV
REPRESENTATIONS
AND WARRANTIES OF BFC AND MERGER SUB
BFC and Merger Sub jointly and severally represent and warrant
to Woodbridge as follows:
4.1 Organization; Good Standing;
Power. BFC is a corporation duly organized,
validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the
State of Florida. Merger Sub is a limited liability company duly
organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws
of the State of Florida. Each of BFC and Merger Sub has all
necessary corporate or limited liability company, as the case
may be, power and authority to execute and deliver this
Agreement and, except as contemplated in this Agreement, to
consummate the Merger and the other transactions contemplated
hereby, to own its properties and assets and to carry on its
business as now conducted. BFC has heretofore made available to
Woodbridge a complete and correct copy of its Articles of
Incorporation, as amended and restated, and its Bylaws, each as
amended to the date hereof. Each of BFC and Merger Sub is duly
licensed or qualified to conduct business and is in good
standing in each jurisdiction in which the nature of its
businesses requires such qualification or license, except where
the failure to be duly qualified could not reasonably be
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on BFC.
4.2 Capitalization.
(a) BFCs authorized capital stock consists solely of
100,000,000 shares of BFC Class A Common Stock,
20,000,000 shares of BFC Class B Common Stock and
10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per
share (collectively, the BFC Capital Stock).
As of the date hereof, 38,275,122 shares of BFC
Class A Common Stock, 6,854,381 shares of BFC
Class B Common Stock, no shares of preferred stock
designated as Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock
and 15,000 shares of preferred stock designated as 5%
Cumulative Preferred Stock are issued and outstanding. As of the
date hereof, 5,804,446 shares of BFC Class A Common
Stock and 831,533 shares of BFC Class B Common Stock
are reserved for issuance under the BFC Option Plans (including
946,196 shares of BFC Class A Common Stock and
831,533 shares of BFC Class B Common Stock reserved
for issuance upon exercise of outstanding BFC Options),
6,854,381 shares of BFC Class A Common Stock are
reserved for issuance upon conversion of shares of BFC
Class B Common Stock, and no shares of BFC Capital Stock
are held in treasury. 100% of the issued and outstanding
membership interests in Merger Sub are owned by BFC, the sole
member of Merger Sub.
(b) All of the issued and outstanding shares of BFC Capital
Stock are duly and validly authorized and issued, fully paid and
nonassessable. None of the outstanding shares of BFC Capital
Stock have been issued in violation of any statutory preemptive
rights. Shares of BFC Class A Common Stock and BFC
Class B Common Stock represent the only securities of BFC
with the right to vote on the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated hereby or for the election of directors of BFC.
Except for BFC Options outstanding on the date hereof to acquire
not more than 946,196 shares of BFC Class A Common
Stock and 831,533 shares of BFC Class B Common Stock,
there are no outstanding or existing BFC Options or other
agreements, commitments or obligations relating to the issuance
of additional shares of any class of capital stock or other
equity securities of BFC; provided, however that, subject
to certain limited exceptions, shares of BFC Class B Common
Stock are convertible on a
share-for-share
basis into shares of BFC Class A Common Stock at any time
in the holders discretion.
(c) All outstanding BFC Options were granted under the BFC
Option Plans. None of the BFC Options was issued in violation of
applicable Law or the terms of the applicable BFC Option Plan.
BFC is not a party to or bound by any contract, agreement or
arrangement to sell or otherwise dispose of or redeem, purchase
or otherwise acquire any of its capital stock. There are no
agreements or understandings with respect to the voting of any
shares of BFC Capital Stock or which restrict the transfer of
such shares to which BFC is a party, nor, except as set forth on
Schedule 4.2(c), does BFC have knowledge of any such
agreements or understandings to which BFC is not a party. Since
March 31, 2009, BFC has not (i) issued any shares of
BFC Capital Stock (or securities exercisable for or convertible
into BFC Capital Stock) other than upon the valid exercise of
BFC Options previously granted under the BFC Option Plans or the
valid conversion of shares of BFC Class B Common Stock to
BFC Class A Common Stock or (ii) granted any options
under the BFC Option Plans. True and complete copies of the BFC
Option Plans have been made available to Woodbridge
Annex A-10
and there is no agreement to amend, modify or supplement the BFC
Option Plans from the form made available to Woodbridge.
(d) The shares of BFC Class A Common Stock to be
issued pursuant to the Merger will, when issued: (i) be
duly authorized, validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable
and not subject to preemptive rights created by the FBCA,
BFCs Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws, or any agreement
to which BFC is a party or is bound; and (ii) be registered
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder (the Securities
Act) and the Exchange Act and registered or exempt from
registration under applicable state, local and other applicable
securities laws.
4.3 Authorization; No
Violation. Except to the extent described
herein, the execution and delivery of this Agreement by BFC and
Merger Sub and the consummation of the transactions contemplated
hereby have been duly and validly authorized by all necessary
corporate action on the part of BFC and all necessary limited
liability company action on the part of Merger Sub, and no other
corporate or limited liability company action on the part of BFC
or Merger Sub, respectively, is necessary (other than the filing
of the Articles of Merger pursuant to the FBCA and the approval
by BFCs shareholders of the transactions contemplated
hereby), and, subject to the terms and conditions of this
Agreement and assuming due and valid authorization, execution
and delivery hereof by the other parties hereto, this Agreement
constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation of BFC and
Merger Sub, enforceable against each of them in accordance with
its terms, except as limited by (x) bankruptcy, insolvency,
moratorium, reorganization, fraudulent conveyance laws and other
similar laws affecting creditors rights generally, and
(y) general principles of equity, regardless of whether
asserted in a proceeding in equity or at law. Neither the
execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement by BFC or
Merger Sub, nor the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby, nor the compliance by BFC and Merger Sub
with any of the provisions of this Agreement, will:
(a) violate, conflict with, or result in a breach of any of
the provisions of, or constitute a default (or an event which,
with notice or lapse of time, or both, would constitute a
default) under, or result in the termination of, or accelerate
the performance required by, or result in a right of termination
or acceleration, or the creation of any Lien upon any of the
properties or assets of BFC or any Subsidiary of BFC under any
of the terms, conditions or provisions of (i) the Articles
of Incorporation or Bylaws (or analogous organizational
documents) of BFC or any of its Subsidiaries or (ii) any
BFC Material Contract, (b) violate any Law or any Order
applicable to BFC or any of its Subsidiaries or any of their
respective properties or assets or (c) require any filing,
declaration or registration by BFC, any Subsidiary of BFC or
Merger Sub with, or permission, determination, waiver,
authorization, consent or approval of, any Governmental Entity
(except for (i) compliance with any applicable requirements
of the Securities Act or the Exchange Act (including the filing
of (A) the Registration Statement and the Joint Proxy
Statement/Prospectus and (B) such reports under
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act with the SEC as
may be required in connection with this Agreement and the
transactions contemplated hereby), (ii) any filings as may
be required under the FBCA in connection with the Merger,
including, without limitation, the Articles of Merger,
(iii) any filings as may be required by the HSR Act and
(iv) such filings and approvals as may be required by any
applicable state securities, blue sky or takeover Laws, except
in the case of clauses (a)(ii), (b) or (c), where such
violation, conflict, breach, default, termination, acceleration,
Lien, security interest, charge, encumbrance or failure to make
such filings or applications could not reasonably be expected to
have a Material Adverse Effect on BFC.
4.4 Subsidiaries. Set forth
on Schedule 4.4 hereto is a list of each Subsidiary
of BFC (other than Subsidiaries of BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc.),
including its name and jurisdiction of organization. Except as
set forth on Schedule 4.4, BFC is the beneficial
owner directly or indirectly of 100% of the outstanding equity
interests in each of its Subsidiaries (other than Subsidiaries
of BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc.), and all of the shares of capital
stock or other equity interests of BFCs Subsidiaries
(other than Subsidiaries of BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc.) are
beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by BFC free and
clear of any Liens. Each Subsidiary of BFC (i) is duly
organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws
of its jurisdiction of organization, (ii) is duly licensed
or qualified to conduct business and in good standing in each
jurisdiction in which the nature of its business reasonably
requires such qualification or license and (iii) has all
necessary power to own its properties and assets and to carry on
its business as presently conducted, except, in each case, where
the failure or lack thereof could not reasonably be expected to
have a Material Adverse Effect on BFC.
Annex A-11
4.5 Exchange Act Reports; Financial
Statements.
(a) Since January 1, 2006, BFC has filed all reports
and other documents required to be filed by it with the SEC
under the Exchange Act, including, but not limited to, proxy
statements and reports on
Form 10-K,
Form 10-Q
and
Form 8-K
(as such documents have been amended since the time of their
filing, collectively, the BFC SEC Reports).
As of the respective dates they were filed with the SEC, or if
amended prior to the date hereof, as of the date of the last
such amendment, the BFC SEC Reports, including all documents
incorporated by reference into such reports, complied in all
material respects with the rules and regulations of the SEC and
did not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact required to be stated therein or
necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of
the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. As
of the date hereof, there are no amendments or modifications to
agreements, documents or other instruments which previously had
been filed by BFC with the SEC pursuant to the Securities Act or
the Exchange Act or any other agreements, documents or other
instruments, which have not yet been filed with the SEC but
which are or will be required to be filed by BFC.
(b) The BFC Financial Statements as of the dates thereof
and for the periods covered thereby, present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position, results of
operations, and cash flows of BFC and its Subsidiaries on a
consolidated basis (subject, in the case of unaudited financial
statements, to normal recurring year-end audit adjustments which
did not and are not expected to have a Material Adverse Effect
on BFC). Any supporting schedules included in the BFC SEC
Reports present fairly, in all material respects, the
information required to be stated therein. Such BFC Financial
Statements and supporting schedules were prepared: (i) in
accordance with the requirements of
Regulation S-X
promulgated by the SEC; and (ii) except as otherwise noted
in the BFC SEC Reports, in conformity with GAAP applied on a
consistent basis. Other than as disclosed in the BFC Financial
Statements, neither BFC nor any of its Subsidiaries has any
liabilities, commitments or obligations of any nature
whatsoever, whether accrued, contingent or otherwise, that would
be required to be reflected on, or reserved against in, a
balance sheet or in notes thereto, prepared in accordance with
GAAP, other than liabilities, commitments or obligations
incurred since March 31, 2009 in the ordinary course of
business to Persons other than Affiliates of BFC that could not
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on BFC.
4.6 Absence of Certain
Changes. Except as disclosed in the BFC SEC
Reports, since March 31, 2009, (i) BFC and each of its
Subsidiaries have conducted their business in the ordinary and
usual course, consistent with past practices, and
(ii) there has not been any event, occurrence, development
or set of circumstances or facts which (A) has had or could
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on BFC
or any of its Subsidiaries, (B) could reasonably be
expected to render any of the representations and warranties of
BFC incorrect or untrue as of the Closing Date or (C) would
result in a violation of the covenants set forth in
Section 6.2 of this Agreement had such events,
occurrences, developments or set of circumstances or facts
occurred after the date hereof.
4.7 Taxes. Except for such
matters as could not reasonably be expected to have a Material
Adverse Effect on BFC, (a) BFC and each of its Subsidiaries
have timely filed or shall timely file all returns and reports
required to be filed by them with any Taxing authority with
respect to Taxes for any period ending on or before the
Effective Time, taking into account any extension of time to
file granted to or obtained on behalf of BFC and its
Subsidiaries, (b) all Taxes shown to be payable on such
returns or reports that are due prior to the Effective Time have
been paid or shall be paid, (c) no deficiency for any
amount of Tax has been asserted or assessed by a Taxing
authority against BFC or any of its Subsidiaries, (d) BFC
and each of its Subsidiaries have provided adequate reserves in
their financial statements for any Taxes that have not been
paid, whether or not shown as being due on any returns or
reports, and (e) no audit or other administrative
proceedings are presently being conducted or have been
threatened in writing against BFC or any of its Subsidiaries by
a Taxing authority.
4.8 BFC Material
Contracts. Each BFC Material Contract has
been filed as an exhibit to a BFC SEC Report. Except as could
not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on
BFC: (i) each BFC Material Contract is valid, binding and
enforceable against the parties thereto in accordance with its
terms, and is in full force and effect on the date hereof; and
(ii) BFC and each of its Subsidiaries have performed in all
Annex A-12
material respects all obligations required to be performed by
them to date under, and they are not in material default in
respect of, any BFC Material Contract, and no event has occurred
which, with due notice or lapse of time or both, would
constitute such a material default. No consent of or notice to
third parties is required pursuant to the terms of any BFC
Material Contract or other material agreement to which BFC or
any of its Subsidiaries is a party as a consequence of this
Agreement or the transactions contemplated herein, except for
such consents or notices which if not obtained or given could
not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on
BFC or materially impair the ability of BFC to consummate the
Merger. To the knowledge of BFC, no other party to any BFC
Material Contract is in material default in respect thereof, and
no event has occurred which, with due notice or lapse of time or
both, would constitute such a material default. BFC has made
available to Woodbridge true, correct and complete copies of all
the written BFC Material Contracts and a brief written summary
or description of each oral BFC Material Contract, and no BFC
Material Contract has been modified in any material respect
since the date it was made available.
4.9 Investigations;
Litigation. Except as set forth in the BFC
SEC Reports, there is no investigation by any Governmental
Entity or any action, suit, proceeding or claim pending, or, to
the knowledge of BFC, threatened, against BFC or any of its
Subsidiaries (including, without limitation, any investigation,
action, or proceeding with respect to Taxes), or the assets or
business of BFC or any of its Subsidiaries which, if determined
adversely to BFC or any of its Subsidiaries, could reasonably be
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on BFC. Neither BFC
nor any of its Subsidiaries nor any director, officer, employee
or agent of BFC or any of its Subsidiaries (in their respective
capacities as such), is a party to any, and there are no
pending, or, to the knowledge of BFC, threatened, material
legal, administrative, arbitral or other proceedings, claims,
suits, actions or governmental investigations of any nature
against BFC or any of its Subsidiaries, or any director,
officer, employee or agent of BFC or any of its Subsidiaries (in
their respective capacities as such), or involving any property
or assets of BFC or any of its Subsidiaries, and to the
knowledge of BFC, there is no outstanding Order of any
Governmental Entity entered specifically against or materially
affecting BFC or any of its Subsidiaries, or any of their
respective assets, businesses or operations.
4.10 Insurance. BFC and its
Subsidiaries have in effect insurance coverage which, in respect
to amounts, types and risks insured, is customary for the
businesses in which BFC and its Subsidiaries are engaged. All of
the insurance policies, binders, bonds and other similar forms
of insurance owned, held or maintained by BFC and each of its
Subsidiaries are in full force and effect, and all premiums with
respect thereto covering all periods up to and including the
date hereof have been paid (other than retrospective premiums
which may be payable with respect to workers compensation
insurance policies). Neither BFC nor any of its Subsidiaries is
in material default under any such policy, and no notice of
cancellation, termination or nonrenewal has been received with
respect to any of the foregoing, and all claims thereunder have
been filed in due and timely fashion. The insurance policies to
which BFC and its Subsidiaries are parties to are sufficient for
compliance with all requirements of Law and, to the extent
applicable, of all BFC Material Contracts and provide adequate
insurance coverage for the assets and operations of BFC and its
Subsidiaries.
4.11 Compliance with
Laws. BFC and each of its Subsidiaries have
all Permits and have made all required filings, applications or
registrations with applicable Governmental Entities necessary to
permit them to carry on their businesses as presently conducted
except where the failure to have such Permits or make such
filings, applications or registrations would not have a Material
Adverse Effect on BFC. All such Permits are in full force and
effect, and, to the knowledge of BFC, no suspension or
cancellation of any of them is pending or has been threatened,
and all such filings, applications and registrations are
current. Neither BFC nor any of its Subsidiaries is in material
default under any such Permits or, to the knowledge of BFC,
under any Order or any license, regulation or demand of any
Governmental Entity. BFC and each of its Subsidiaries have
conducted their businesses in compliance in all material
respects with all applicable Laws.
4.12 Labor Matters. Neither
BFC nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to, nor does BFC or
any of its Subsidiaries have in effect, any organized labor
contract or collective bargaining agreement.
4.13 Employee Benefit Plans.
(a) Schedule 4.13 lists all of the BFC Plans.
Each BFC Plan is now and always has been operated in all
material respects in accordance with its terms and the
requirements of all applicable Laws. BFC has performed
Annex A-13
all obligations required to be performed by it under, is not in
any material respect in default under or in violation of, and
has no knowledge of any default or violation by any party to,
any BFC Plan. Except as otherwise described in
Schedule 4.13, no action, suit, proceeding or claim
is pending or, to the knowledge of BFC, threatened, against BFC
with respect to any BFC Plan (other than claims for benefits in
the ordinary course).
(b) All contributions, premiums or payments required to be
made with respect to all BFC Plans have been made. All such
contributions have been fully deducted for income tax purposes,
and no such deduction has been challenged or disallowed by any
Governmental Entity.
(c) Neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement
nor the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby
will (either alone or in conjunction with any other event)
result in, cause the accelerated vesting or delivery of, or
increase the amount or value of, any severance, termination or
other payment to any director, officer, employee or consultant
of BFC or any of its Subsidiaries.
4.14 Related Party
Transactions. Except for arrangements
disclosed in the BFC SEC Reports, no holder of more than 5% of
the BFC Class A Common Stock or BFC Class B Common
Stock, or any officer or director of BFC or any Subsidiary of
BFC, or, to the knowledge of BFC, any Affiliate of any of the
foregoing (other than BFC and its Subsidiaries) (i) is
indebted to BFC for money borrowed from BFC; (ii) to the
knowledge of BFC, has any direct or indirect material interest
in any Person which is a customer or supplier of BFC or any of
its Subsidiaries; or (iii) is party to any other material
transaction or business relationship with BFC or any of its
Subsidiaries that would be required to be disclosed in the BFC
SEC Reports pursuant to Item 404(a) of
Regulation S-K
of the SEC.
4.15 Brokers and Finders
Fees. BFC has not employed any broker or
finder and has not incurred and will not incur any
brokers, finders or similar fees, commissions or
expenses to any party in connection with the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement.
4.16 Registration Statement; Joint Proxy
Statement/Prospectus. None of the information
included in BFCs registration statement on
Form S-4,
which shall include the joint proxy statement relating to the
Woodbridge Meeting and the BFC Special Meeting (together with
any amendments thereof or supplements thereto, the
Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus), pursuant
to which the issuance of the shares of BFC Class A Common
Stock to be issued to Woodbridges shareholders in the
Merger will be registered under the Securities Act (the
Registration Statement), relating to
BFC will, at the time the Registration Statement is filed with
the SEC, at the time it becomes effective under the Securities
Act and at the time of the BFC Special Meeting or the Woodbridge
Meeting, contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state any material fact required to be stated therein or
necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of
the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
4.17 Tax Treatment. BFC has
no knowledge of any reason why the Merger will, and has not
taken or agreed to take and has no plans to take any action that
could cause the Merger to, fail to qualify as a
reorganization under Section 368(a) of
the Code.
4.18 Opinion of Financial
Advisor. JMP Securities LLC has delivered to
the Board of Directors of BFC (i) its written opinion to
the effect that, as of the date hereof, the Exchange Ratio is
fair from a financial point of view to BFCs shareholders
and (ii) its consent to the inclusion of such opinion in
its entirety in any filing required to be made by BFC with the
SEC with respect to the Merger if such inclusion is required by
applicable law, which filings include, without limitation, the
Registration Statement.
4.19 Sarbanes-Oxley. There
is and has been no failure on the part of BFC or any of its
directors or officers, in their capacities as such, to comply in
all material respects with any applicable provision of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act) and the rules and regulations promulgated in
connection therewith, except, in the case of BFCs
directors and officers, where the failure to comply could not
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on BFC.
4.20 Certain Business
Practices. Neither BFC, nor, to BFCs
knowledge, any of its Subsidiaries, nor, in connection with the
operation of the business of BFC or any of its Subsidiaries, any
directors or officers,
Annex A-14
agents or employees of BFC or, to BFCs knowledge, any of
its Subsidiaries, has (i) directly or indirectly given or
agreed to give any funds for unlawful contributions, payments,
gifts, entertainment or other unlawful expenses related to
political activity, (ii) made any unlawful payment to
foreign or domestic government officials or employees or to
foreign or domestic political parties or campaigns or violated
any provision of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as
amended, or (iii) made any payment in the nature of
criminal bribery.
4.21 Operations of Merger
Sub. Merger Sub is a direct, wholly owned
subsidiary of BFC, was formed solely for the purpose of engaging
in the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, has engaged
in no other business activities and has conducted its operations
only as contemplated by this Agreement. Except for obligations
and liabilities incurred in connection with its organization and
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, Merger Sub has
no obligations or liabilities.
4.22 Full Disclosure. No
representation or warranty of BFC contained in this Agreement,
and none of the statements or information concerning BFC and its
Subsidiaries contained in this Agreement or the exhibits and the
schedules hereto, contains or will contain any untrue statement
of a material fact nor will such representations, warranties,
covenants or statements taken as a whole omit a material fact
required to be stated therein or necessary in order to make the
statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which
they were made, not misleading.
ARTICLE V
REPRESENTATIONS
AND WARRANTIES OF WOODBRIDGE
Woodbridge represents and warrants to BFC and Merger Sub as
follows:
5.1 Organization; Good Standing;
Power. Woodbridge is a corporation duly
organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws
of the State of Florida. Woodbridge has all necessary corporate
power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and,
except as contemplated in this Agreement, to consummate the
Merger and the other transactions contemplated hereby, to own
its properties and assets and to carry on its business as now
conducted. Woodbridge is duly licensed or qualified to conduct
business and in good standing in each jurisdiction in which the
nature of its businesses requires such qualification or license,
except where the failure to be so licensed or qualified could
not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on
Woodbridge.
5.2 Capitalization.
(a) Woodbridges authorized capital stock consists
solely of 30,000,000 shares of Woodbridge Class A
Common Stock, 2,000,000 shares of Woodbridge Class B
Common Stock and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par
value $0.01 per share (collectively, the Woodbridge
Capital Stock). As of the date hereof,
16,637,132 shares of Woodbridge Class A Common Stock,
243,807 shares of Woodbridge Class B Common Stock and
no shares of preferred stock are issued and outstanding. As of
the date hereof, 600,000 shares of Woodbridge Class A
Common Stock are reserved for issuance under the Woodbridge
Option Plan (including 314,971 shares of Woodbridge
Class A Common Stock reserved for issuance upon exercise of
outstanding Woodbridge Options), 243,807 shares of
Woodbridge Class A Common Stock are reserved for issuance
upon conversion of shares of Woodbridge Class B Common
Stock, and no shares of Woodbridge Capital Stock are held in
treasury.
(b) All of the issued and outstanding shares of Woodbridge
Capital Stock are duly and validly authorized and issued, fully
paid and nonassessable. None of the outstanding shares of
Woodbridge Capital Stock have been issued in violation of any
statutory preemptive rights. The Woodbridge Class A Common
Stock and Woodbridge Class B Common Stock are the only
securities of Woodbridge with the right to vote on the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement or for the election
of directors of Woodbridge. Except for Woodbridge Options
outstanding on the date hereof to acquire not more than
314,971 shares of Woodbridge Class A Common Stock,
there are no outstanding or existing Woodbridge Options or other
agreements, commitments or obligations relating to the issuance
of additional shares of any class of capital stock or other
Annex A-15
equity securities of Woodbridge; provided, however, that
shares of Woodbridge Class B Common Stock are convertible
on a
share-for-share
basis into shares of Woodbridge Class A Common Stock at any
time in BFCs discretion.
(c) Woodbridge is not a party to or bound by any contract,
agreement or arrangement to sell or otherwise dispose of or
redeem, purchase or otherwise acquire any of its capital stock.
Other than as set forth in Woodbridges Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation, there are no agreements or
understandings with respect to the voting of any shares of
Woodbridge Capital Stock or which restrict the transfer of such
shares to which Woodbridge is a party, nor does Woodbridge have
knowledge of any such agreements or understandings to which
Woodbridge is not a party. Except as set forth on
Schedule 5.2, since March 31, 2009, Woodbridge
has not issued any shares of Woodbridge Capital Stock (or
securities exercisable for or convertible into Woodbridge
Capital Stock) other than upon the valid exercise of options
previously granted under the Woodbridge Option Plan. The terms
of the Woodbridge Option Plan permit the substitution of
restricted stock awards of BFC Class A Common Stock for the
outstanding Woodbridge restricted stock awards and the
cancellation of Woodbridge Options, in each case as provided in
this Agreement, without the consent or approval of the holders
of such securities, the shareholders of Woodbridge, or any other
Person (other than Woodbridges Board of Directors or a
committee thereof). A true and complete copy of the Woodbridge
Option Plan and all agreements and instruments relating to or
issued under the Woodbridge Option Plan have been made available
to BFC, and no such plan, agreement or instrument has been
amended, modified or supplemented, and there is no agreement to
amend, modify or supplement any such plan, agreement or
instrument in any case from the form made available to BFC.
(d) No bonds, debentures, notes or other indebtedness of
Woodbridge having the right to vote on any matters on which
shareholders may vote are issued or outstanding.
5.3 Authorization; No
Violation. The execution and delivery of this
Agreement by Woodbridge and the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby have been duly and validly authorized by all
necessary corporate action on the part of Woodbridge, and no
other corporate action on the part of Woodbridge is necessary
(other than the approval of this Agreement by the holders of
Woodbridge Capital Stock and the filing of the Articles of
Merger pursuant to the FBCA), and, subject to the terms and
conditions of this Agreement and assuming due and valid
authorization, execution and delivery hereof by the other
parties hereto, this Agreement constitutes the legal, valid and
binding obligation of Woodbridge, enforceable against it in
accordance with its terms, except as limited by
(x) bankruptcy, insolvency, moratorium, reorganization,
fraudulent conveyance laws and other similar laws affecting
creditors rights generally, and (y) general
principles of equity, regardless of whether asserted in a
proceeding in equity or at law. Except as set forth on
Schedule 5.3, neither the execution, delivery and
performance of this Agreement by Woodbridge, nor the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, nor the
compliance by Woodbridge with any of the provisions of this
Agreement, will: (a) violate, conflict with, or result in a
breach of any of the provisions of, or constitute a default (or
an event which, with notice or lapse of time, or both, would
constitute a default) under, or result in the termination of, or
accelerate the performance required by, or result in a right of
termination or acceleration, or the creation of any Lien upon
any of the properties or assets of Woodbridge or any Subsidiary
of Woodbridge under any of the terms, conditions or provisions
of (i) the Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws (or
analogous organizational documents) of Woodbridge or any of its
Subsidiaries or (ii) any Woodbridge Material Contract;
(b) violate any Law or any Order applicable to Woodbridge
or any of its Subsidiaries or any of their respective properties
or assets or (c) require any filing, declaration or
registration by Woodbridge with, or permission, determination,
waiver, authorization, consent or approval of, any Governmental
Entity (except for (i) compliance with any applicable
requirements of the Securities Act or the Exchange Act
(including the filing of (A) the Registration Statement and
the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus and (B) such reports
under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act with the
SEC as may be required in connection with this Agreement and the
transactions contemplated hereby); (ii) any filings as may
be required under the FBCA in connection with the Merger,
including, without limitation, the Articles of Merger,
(iii) any filings as may be required by the HSR Act and
(iv) such filings and approvals as may be required by any
applicable state securities, blue sky or takeover Laws, except
in the case of clauses (a)(ii), (b) or (c), where such
violation, conflict, breach, default, termination, acceleration,
lien, security interest,
Annex A-16
charge, encumbrance or failure to make such filings or
applications could not reasonably be expected to have a Material
Adverse Effect on Woodbridge.
5.4 Subsidiaries. Set forth
on Schedule 5.4 hereto is a list of each Subsidiary
of Woodbridge, including its name and jurisdiction of
organization. Except as set forth on Schedule 5.4
hereto, Woodbridge does not own more than 20% of the capital
stock or similar interests in or control any entities
(including, without limitation, corporations, limited liability
companies, partnerships, joint ventures and inactive
corporations). Except as set forth on Schedule 5.4,
Woodbridge is the beneficial owner directly or indirectly of
100% of the outstanding equity interests in each of its
Subsidiaries, and all of the shares of capital stock or other
equity interests of Woodbridges Subsidiaries are
beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by Woodbridge free
and clear of any Liens. Each Subsidiary of Woodbridge
(i) is duly organized, validly existing and in good
standing under the laws of its jurisdiction of organization,
(ii) is duly licensed or qualified to conduct business and
in good standing in each jurisdiction in which the nature of its
business reasonably requires such qualification or license and
(iii) has all necessary power to own its properties and
assets and to carry on its business as presently conducted,
except, in each case, where the failure or lack thereof could
not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on
Woodbridge.
5.5 Exchange Act Reports; Financial
Statements.
(a) Since January 1, 2006, Woodbridge has filed all
reports and other documents required to be filed by it with the
SEC under the Exchange Act, including but not limited to proxy
statements and reports on
Form 10-K,
Form 10-Q
and
Form 8-K
(as such documents have been amended since the time of their
filing, collectively, the Woodbridge SEC
Reports). As of the respective dates they were filed
with the SEC, or if amended prior to the date hereof, as of the
date of the last such amendment, the Woodbridge SEC Reports,
including all documents incorporated by reference into such
reports, complied in all material respects with the rules and
regulations of the SEC and did not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to
be stated therein or necessary in order to make the statements
therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were
made, not misleading. As of the date hereof, there are no
amendments or modifications to agreements, documents or other
instruments which previously had been filed by Woodbridge with
the SEC pursuant to the Securities Act or the Exchange Act or
any other agreements, documents or other instruments, which have
not yet been filed with the SEC but which are or will be
required to be filed by Woodbridge.
(b) The Woodbridge Financial Statements as of the dates
thereof and for the periods covered thereby, present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position, results of
operations, and cash flows of Woodbridge and its Subsidiaries on
a consolidated basis (subject, in the case of unaudited
financial statements, to normal recurring year-end audit
adjustments which did not and are not expected to have a
Material Adverse Effect on Woodbridge). Any supporting schedules
included in the Woodbridge SEC Reports present fairly, in all
material respects, the information required to be stated
therein. Such Woodbridge Financial Statements and supporting
schedules were prepared: (i) in accordance with the
requirements of
Regulation S-X
promulgated by the SEC; and (ii) except as otherwise noted
in the Woodbridge SEC Reports, in conformity with GAAP applied
on a consistent basis in accordance with past practice. Other
than as disclosed in the Woodbridge Financial Statements,
neither Woodbridge nor any of its Subsidiaries has any
liabilities, commitments or obligations of any nature
whatsoever, whether accrued, contingent or otherwise, that would
be required to be reflected on, or reserved against in, a
balance sheet or in notes thereto, prepared in accordance with
GAAP, other than liabilities, commitments or obligations
incurred since March 31, 2009 in the ordinary course of
business to Persons other than Affiliates of Woodbridge or that
could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse
Effect on Woodbridge.
5.6 Absence of Certain
Changes. Except as set forth in
Schedule 5.6 or as disclosed in the Woodbridge SEC
Reports, since March 31, 2009, (i) Woodbridge and its
Subsidiaries have conducted their respective businesses in the
ordinary and usual course, consistent with past practices, and
(ii) there has not been any event, occurrence, development
or set of circumstances or facts which (A) has had or could
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on
Woodbridge, or (B) could reasonably be expected to render
any of the representations and warranties of Woodbridge
contained in this Agreement incorrect or untrue as of the
Annex A-17
Closing Date or (C) would result in a violation of the
covenants set forth in Section 6.1 of this Agreement
had such events, occurrences, developments or set of
circumstances or facts occurred after the date hereof.
5.7 Taxes. Except as set
forth on Schedule 5.7 and except for such matters as
could not reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse
Effect on Woodbridge, (a) Woodbridge and each of its
Subsidiaries have timely filed or shall timely file all returns
and reports required to be filed by them with any taxing
authority with respect to Taxes for any period ending on or
before the Effective Time, taking into account any extension of
time to file granted to or obtained on behalf of Woodbridge and
its Subsidiaries, (b) all Taxes shown to be payable on such
returns or reports that are due prior to the Effective Time have
been paid or shall be paid, (c) no deficiency for any
amount of Tax has been asserted or assessed by a Taxing
authority against Woodbridge or any of its Subsidiaries,
(d) Woodbridge and each of its Subsidiaries have provided
adequate reserves in their financial statements for any Taxes
that have not been paid, whether or not shown as being due on
any returns or reports, and (e) no audit or other
administrative proceedings are presently being conducted or have
been threatened in writing against Woodbridge or any of its
Subsidiaries by a Taxing authority.
5.8 Investigations,
Litigation. Except as set forth on
Schedule 5.8 or in the Woodbridge SEC Reports, there
is no investigation by any Governmental Entity or any action,
suit, proceeding or claim pending, or, to the knowledge of
Woodbridge, threatened, against Woodbridge or any of its
Subsidiaries (including, without limitation, any investigation,
action, or proceeding with respect to Taxes), or the assets or
business of Woodbridge or any of its Subsidiaries which, if
determined adversely to Woodbridge or such Subsidiary, could
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on
Woodbridge. Except as disclosed on Schedule 5.8:
(i) neither Woodbridge nor any of its Subsidiaries nor any
director, manager, officer, employee or agent of Woodbridge or
any of its Subsidiaries (in their respective capacities as
such), is a party to any, and there are no pending, or, to the
knowledge of Woodbridge, threatened, material legal,
administrative, arbitral or other proceedings, claims, suits,
actions or governmental investigations of any nature against
Woodbridge or any of its Subsidiaries, or any director, officer,
employee or agent of Woodbridge or any of its Subsidiaries (in
their respective capacities as such), or involving any property
or assets of Woodbridge or any of its Subsidiaries and
(ii) to the knowledge of Woodbridge, there is no
outstanding Order of any Governmental Entity entered
specifically against or materially affecting Woodbridge or any
of its Subsidiaries, or any of their respective assets,
businesses or operations.
5.9 Woodbridge Material
Contracts. Each Woodbridge Material Contract
has been filed as an exhibit to a Woodbridge SEC Report or
previously provided to BFC. Except as could not reasonably be
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on Woodbridge,
(i) each Woodbridge Material Contract is valid, binding and
enforceable against the parties thereto in accordance with its
terms, and is in full force and effect on the date hereof; and
(ii) Woodbridge and each of its Subsidiaries have performed
in all material respects all obligations required to be
performed by such entity to date under, and are not in material
default in respect of, any Woodbridge Material Contract, and no
event has occurred which, with due notice or lapse of time or
both, would constitute such a material default. Except as set
forth on Schedule 5.9 which shall be delivered no
later than fifteen (15) Business Days after the date
hereof, no consent of or notice to third parties is required
pursuant to the terms of any Woodbridge Material Contract or
other material agreement to which Woodbridge or any of its
Subsidiaries is a party as a consequence of this Agreement or
the transactions contemplated herein, except for any such
consents or notices which if not obtained or given could not
reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on
Woodbridge or materially impair the ability of Woodbridge to
consummate the Merger. To the knowledge of Woodbridge, no other
party to any Woodbridge Material Contract is in material default
in respect thereof, and no event has occurred which, with due
notice or lapse of time or both, would constitute such a
material default. Woodbridge has made available to BFC true,
correct and complete copies of all the written Woodbridge
Material Contracts and a brief written summary or description of
each oral Woodbridge Material Contract, and no Woodbridge
Material Contract has been modified in any material respect
since the date it was made available.
5.10 Brokers and Finders
Fees. Neither Woodbridge nor any of its
Subsidiaries has employed any broker or finder and neither
Woodbridge nor any of its Subsidiaries has incurred or will
incur any brokers,
Annex A-18
finders or similar fees, commissions or expenses to any
party in connection with the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement.
5.11 Registration Statement; Joint Proxy
Statement/Prospectus. None of the information
included in the Registration Statement or the Joint Proxy
Statement/Prospectus relating to Woodbridge will, at the time
the Registration Statement is filed with the SEC, at the time it
becomes effective under the Securities Act or at the time of the
BFC Special Meeting or the Woodbridge Meeting, contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any
material fact required to be stated therein or necessary in
order to make the statements therein, in light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
5.12 State Takeover
Laws. Woodbridge has taken all action
necessary on its part to exempt the Merger, this Agreement and
the transactions contemplated hereby, and the Merger, this
Agreement, and (except for the taking of any actions that may be
necessary on the part of BFC in order for such matters to be so
exempt) the transactions contemplated hereby are exempt from any
applicable state anti-takeover statutes, including, without
limitation, Sections 607.0901 and 607.0902 of the FBCA.
5.13 Opinion of Financial
Advisor. Allen C. Ewing & Co. has
delivered to the Special Committee (and the Board of Directors
of Woodbridge) its written opinion to the effect that, as of the
date hereof, the Merger Consideration is fair to
Woodbridges shareholders from a financial point of view
and its consent to the inclusion of such opinion in the Joint
Proxy Statement/Prospectus.
5.14 Tax
Treatment. Woodbridge has no knowledge of any
reason why the Merger will, and has not taken or agreed to take
and has no plans to take any action that could cause the Merger
to, fail to qualify as a reorganization under
Section 368(a) of the Code.
5.15 Full Disclosure. No
representation or warranty of Woodbridge contained in this
Agreement, and none of the statements or information concerning
Woodbridge and its Subsidiaries contained in this Agreement or
the exhibits and the schedules hereto, contains or will contain
any untrue statement of a material fact nor will such
representations, warranties, covenants or statements taken as a
whole omit a material fact required to be stated therein or
necessary in order to make the statements therein, in light of
the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading.
ARTICLE VI
CONDUCT
OF BUSINESS PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE TIME
6.1 Conduct of Business by
Woodbridge. Except as expressly contemplated
by any other provision of this Agreement, Woodbridge agrees that
from the date of this Agreement until the earlier of the
termination of this Agreement and the Effective Time, Woodbridge
shall not (and shall cause each of its Subsidiaries to not),
directly or indirectly, take or propose to take any of the
following actions without the prior written consent of BFC:
(a) conduct the businesses of Woodbridge and its
Subsidiaries in a manner, or take any action with respect to the
businesses of Woodbridge and its Subsidiaries, that is not in
the ordinary course of business and consistent with past
practice or that would cause Woodbridge or any of its
Subsidiaries to be in default under any Woodbridge Material
Contract (as in effect on the date hereof, irrespective of any
subsequent waiver or amendment);
(b) change or amend the Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws
of Woodbridge;
(c) issue, sell, or grant any shares of capital stock
(except Woodbridge Class A Common Stock to be issued upon
exercise of Woodbridge Options outstanding on the date of the
Agreement), or, except in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practices, any options, warrants, or rights
to purchase or subscribe to, or enter into any arrangement or
contract with respect to the issuance or sale of, any of the
capital stock of Woodbridge or any of its Subsidiaries or rights
or obligations convertible into or exchangeable for any such
shares of capital stock;
Annex A-19
(d) divide, combine or reclassify any of its capital stock
or otherwise make any changes in the capital structure of
Woodbridge;
(e) declare, pay, or set aside for payment any dividend or
other distribution in respect of the capital stock or other
equity securities of Woodbridge or any Subsidiary of Woodbridge,
except as consistent with past practice;
(f) adopt a plan of complete or partial liquidation,
dissolution, merger, consolidation, restructuring,
recapitalization or other reorganization of Woodbridge or any of
its Subsidiaries;
(g) engage in any action that could reasonably be expected
to cause the Merger to fail to qualify as a
reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code;
(h) take any action that would cause Woodbridges
representations and warranties set forth in this Agreement to be
untrue in any material respect;
(i) take any action that would reasonably be likely to
materially delay the Merger; or
(j) agree to take, or make any commitment to take, any of
the foregoing actions.
6.2 Conduct of Business by
BFC. Except as expressly contemplated by any
other provision of this Agreement, BFC agrees that from the date
of this Agreement until the earlier of the termination of this
Agreement and the Effective Time, BFC shall not, directly or
indirectly, take or propose to take any of the following actions
without the prior written consent of Woodbridge:
(a) conduct the businesses of BFC and its Subsidiaries in a
manner, or take any action with respect to the businesses of BFC
and its Subsidiaries, that is not in the ordinary course of
business and consistent with past practice or that would cause
BFC or any of its Subsidiaries to be in default under any BFC
Material Contract (as in effect on the date hereof, irrespective
of any subsequent waiver or amendment);
(b) change or amend the Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws
of BFC, except for an amendment to BFCs Articles of
Incorporation increasing the number of authorized shares of BFC
Class A Common Stock and an amendment to BFCs Bylaws
increasing the maximum size of BFCs Board of Directors;
(c) divide, combine or reclassify any of its capital stock
or otherwise make any changes in the capital structure of BFC;
(d) declare, pay, or set aside for payment any dividend or
other distribution in respect of the capital stock or other
equity securities of BFC or any Subsidiary of BFC, except as
consistent with past practice;
(e) cause BFCs directors and officers liability
insurance policy, and any excess liability policy related
thereto, to be canceled, terminated or otherwise not be renewed
or replaced with at least an equivalent amount of coverage and
on other terms no less favorable to BFC and its officers and
directors;
(f) adopt a plan of complete or partial liquidation,
dissolution, merger, consolidation, restructuring,
recapitalization or other reorganization of BFC or any of its
Subsidiaries;
(g) engage in any action that could reasonably be expected
to cause the Merger to fail to qualify as a
reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Code;
(h) take any action that would cause BFCs
representations and warranties set forth in this Agreement to be
untrue in any material respect;
(i) take any action that would reasonably be likely to
materially delay the Merger; or
(j) agree to take, or make any commitment to take, any of
the foregoing actions.
6.3 Notice. Each party will
promptly notify the other party of (i) any event of which
it obtains knowledge which has or is reasonably likely to have a
Material Adverse Effect on such party or any of its
Subsidiaries, (ii) any event or circumstance that
constitutes or could reasonably be expected to constitute a
breach of any of the representations, warranties, or covenants
of such party contained herein or (iii) any event or
circumstance which could materially and adversely affect the
partys ability to satisfy the conditions to the
Annex A-20
Merger. Each party will promptly notify the other party in the
event it determines that it is unable to fulfill any of the
conditions to performance by the other party hereunder.
ARTICLE VII
ADDITIONAL
COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS
7.1 Access to
Information. From the date hereof through the
Effective Time, each party shall permit the other party and its
authorized representatives reasonable access during regular
business hours to the properties of such party (and, in the case
of each of BFC or Woodbridge, its Subsidiaries). Each party
shall (and, in the case of each of BFC or Woodbridge shall cause
its Subsidiaries to) make their respective directors, management
and other employees and agents and authorized representatives
(including counsel and independent public accountants) available
to confer with the other party, and its authorized
representatives at reasonable times and upon reasonable request,
and each party shall disclose and make available to the other
party and shall cause its agents and authorized representatives
to disclose and make available to the other party, all books,
papers and records relating to the assets, properties,
operations, obligations and liabilities of such party (and, in
the case of each of BFC or Woodbridge, its Subsidiaries). Each
party may make or cause to be made such investigation of the
records, business and properties of the other party (and, in the
case of each of BFC and Woodbridge, its Subsidiaries) as such
party deems necessary or advisable to familiarize itself and its
advisors with such business, properties, and other matters,
provided that any such investigation shall be reasonably related
to the transactions contemplated hereby and shall not unduly
interfere with the normal operations of the other party (or, in
the case of each of BFC or Woodbridge, the operations of its
Subsidiaries). Each party agrees to maintain the confidentiality
of all information exchanged pursuant to this
Section 7.1, except as otherwise required by Law.
7.2 Public
Announcements. Any public announcement made
by or on behalf of either BFC or Woodbridge prior to the
termination of this Agreement concerning this Agreement, the
transactions described herein or any other aspect of the
dealings heretofore had or hereafter to be had between
Woodbridge and BFC and their respective Affiliates must first be
approved by the other party (any such approval not to be
unreasonably withheld or delayed), subject to either
partys obligations under applicable Law (but such party
shall use its reasonable best efforts to consult with the other
party as to all such public announcements).
7.3 Reasonable
Efforts. Subject to the terms and conditions
of this Agreement, (a) the parties shall use their
respective reasonable efforts in good faith to take or cause to
be taken as promptly as practicable all reasonable actions that
are within their control to cause to be fulfilled those
conditions precedent to their obligations to consummate the
Merger and (b) the parties shall use reasonable efforts to
obtain all consents and approvals required in connection with
the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement.
7.4 No Solicitation.
(a) From and after the date of this Agreement until the
Effective Time, subject to Section 7.4(b) hereof,
without the prior written consent of BFC, Woodbridge will not,
and will not permit its directors, officers, employees,
investment bankers, attorneys, accountants or other
representatives, agents or Affiliates to, and, without the prior
written consent of Woodbridge, BFC will not, and will not permit
its directors, officers, employees, investment bankers,
attorneys, accountants or other representatives, agents or
Affiliates to, directly or indirectly, (i) solicit,
initiate, or knowingly encourage any Acquisition Proposals or
any inquiries or proposals that could reasonably be expected to
lead to any Acquisition Proposals, (ii) engage in
negotiations or discussions concerning, or provide any
non-public information to any Person in connection with, any
Acquisition Proposal or under circumstances that could
reasonably be expected to result in an Acquisition Proposal or
(iii) agree to, approve, recommend or otherwise endorse or
support any Acquisition Proposal. As used herein, the term
Acquisition Proposal shall mean any proposal
relating to a possible (1) merger, consolidation, share
exchange, business combination or similar transaction involving
Woodbridge or any of its Subsidiaries or BFC, as the case may
be, (2) sale, lease, exchange, transfer or other
disposition (other than sales of inventory in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practices), directly or
indirectly, by
Annex A-21
merger, consolidation, share exchange or otherwise (whether in
one or more transactions), of all or substantially all of the
assets of Woodbridge and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated
basis or BFC, as the case may be, (3) liquidation,
dissolution, recapitalization or other similar type of
transaction, (4) tender offer or exchange offer for ten
percent (10%) or more of the outstanding shares of Woodbridge
Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock or BFC
Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock, as the
case may be, or other transaction with Woodbridge or BFC in
which any Person or group shall acquire or have the right to
acquire beneficial ownership of ten percent (10%) or more of the
outstanding shares of Woodbridge Class A Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock or BFC Class A Common Stock and
Class B Common Stock, as the case may be, or
(5) transaction which is similar in form, substance or
purpose to any of the foregoing transactions; provided,
however, that the term Acquisition
Proposal shall not include the Merger and the
transactions contemplated hereby or any proposal or modification
thereof submitted by BFC or any of its Affiliates (other than
Woodbridge or any of its Subsidiaries, directors, officers,
employees or agents). Each of Woodbridge and BFC will, and will
direct all its directors, officers, employees, investment
bankers, attorneys, accountants and other representatives,
agents and Affiliates to, immediately cease any and all existing
activities, discussions or negotiations with any parties
conducted heretofore with respect to any of the foregoing.
(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of
Section 7.4(a) above, if a Person or group other
than BFC or any of its Affiliates, on the one hand, and other
than Woodbridge or any of its Affiliates, on the other hand (any
such Person or group, a Third Party), after
the date of this Agreement submits to Woodbridge or its Board of
Directors, or the Special Committee, or BFC or its Board of
Directors, as the case may be, not resulting from a breach of
Section 7.4(a) above, an unsolicited, bona fide,
written Acquisition Proposal, and the Special Committee or
Woodbridges Board of Directors or BFCs Board of
Directors, as the case may be, reasonably determines in good
faith, (i) after consultation with their financial, legal
and other advisors that such Acquisition Proposal will result
in, or upon further discussion with or due diligence by such
Third Party could reasonably be expected to constitute or result
in, a Superior Proposal and (ii) after consultation with
outside legal counsel, that the failure to take the action set
forth in (A) and (B) below may be inconsistent with
its fiduciary duties under applicable Law, then, in such case
Woodbridge or BFC, as the case may be, may (A) furnish
information about its business to the Third Party under
protection of an appropriate confidentiality agreement
containing customary limitations on the use and disclosure of
all non-public written or oral information furnished to such
Third Party, provided that Woodbridge contemporaneously
furnishes to BFC or BFC contemporaneously furnishes to
Woodbridge, as applicable, all such non-public information
furnished to the Third Party and (B) negotiate and
participate in discussions and negotiations with such Third
Party. In the event that, after the date of this Agreement and
prior to the Effective Time, Woodbridge or BFC receives a
Superior Proposal not in violation of Section 7.4(a)
and the Special Committee or the Board of Directors of
Woodbridge or the Board of Directors of BFC, as the case may be,
determines, in good faith and after consultation with its
financial advisors and legal counsel, that the failure to do so
would be inconsistent with the applicable Board of
Directors fiduciary duties under applicable Law, then
Woodbridges or BFCs Board of Directors, as the case
may be, may: (x) withhold, withdraw, modify or change its
approval or recommendation of this Agreement or the Merger
and/or
(y) approve or recommend to the applicable companys
shareholders the Superior Proposal. The applicable
companys Board of Directors shall not take the action
described in clauses (x) or (y) above without
providing the other party with at least two (2) Business
Days prior written notice stating that it intends to take such
actions and setting forth the information specified in
Section 7.4(c) hereof with respect to any Superior
Proposal which it intends to accept or recommend. For purposes
of this Agreement, Superior Proposal means
any unsolicited, bona fide, written Acquisition Proposal for
consideration consisting of cash (not subject to a financing
contingency)
and/or
securities, and otherwise on terms which the Special Committee
or Woodbridges Board of Directors or BFCs Board of
Directors, as the case may be, determines, after consultation
with their legal, financial and other advisors, are more
favorable to Woodbridges shareholders or BFC (or its
shareholders), as the case may be, from a financial point of
view than the Merger or other revised proposal submitted by BFC
or Woodbridge prior to such determination, taking into account
the ability of the Third Party to consummate the Superior
Proposal on substantially the terms proposed. Nothing contained
herein shall prohibit Woodbridge or BFC from taking, and
Annex A-22
disclosing to its shareholders, a position required by
Rule 14d-9
or
Rule 14e-2(a)
promulgated under the Exchange Act or Item 1012(a) of
Regulation M-A
of the SEC.
(c) Woodbridge or BFC, as the case may be, will notify the
other party immediately, and in any event within twenty-four
(24) hours, if (i) an Acquisition Proposal is made or
is modified in any respect (including any written material
provided by the offeror, the principal terms and conditions of
any such Acquisition Proposal or modification thereto and the
identity of the offeror), in which case Woodbridge or BFC, as
the case may be, will provide a copy of the Acquisition Proposal
concurrently with such notice or (ii) Woodbridge or BFC, as
the case may be, furnishes non-public information to, or enters
into discussions or negotiations with respect to an Acquisition
Proposal with, any Third Party.
(d) In addition to the obligations set forth in paragraph
(a), (b) and (c) of this Section 7.4,
Woodbridge or BFC, as the case may be, as promptly as
practicable, will advise the other party orally and in writing
of any request for information that could reasonably be expected
to lead to an Acquisition Proposal, and the material terms and
conditions of such request or inquiry, and keep the other party
informed in all respects of the status of any such request or
inquiry. In addition to the foregoing, Woodbridge or BFC, as the
case may be, will provide the other party with prior telephonic
(promptly confirmed in writing) or written notice of any meeting
of its Board of Directors (or any committee thereof) at which
its Board of Directors (or any committee thereof) is expected or
could reasonably be expected to consider an Acquisition
Proposal, together with a copy of the documentation relating to
such Acquisition Proposal to the extent such documentation is
then available (and otherwise provide such documentation as soon
as available).
7.5 Shareholder Meetings.
(a) Woodbridge shall call the Woodbridge Meeting to be held
as promptly as reasonably practicable after the effectiveness of
the Registration Statement for the purpose of voting upon this
Agreement and for no other purpose without the prior written
consent of BFC; provided, however, that in the event the
Woodbridge Meeting is the annual meeting of Woodbridges
shareholders, then a proposal relating to the election of
directors to the Board of Directors of Woodbridge may be acted
upon at the Woodbridge Meeting without the prior written consent
of BFC. Except as provided in Section 7.4(b) with
respect to the right of the Special Committee or
Woodbridges Board of Directors to withhold, withdraw,
modify or change its recommendation to Woodbridges
shareholders, Woodbridge shall use its reasonable efforts to
secure the vote of its shareholders required under the FBCA and
include in the Registration Statement the recommendation of its
Board of Directors in favor of the Merger Agreement.
(b) BFC shall call the BFC Special Meeting to be held as
promptly as reasonably practicable after the effectiveness of
the Registration Statement for the purpose of voting on the
Merger and the related transactions, including an amendment to
the Articles of Incorporation of BFC to increase the number of
authorized shares of BFC Class A Common Stock. BFC shall
use its reasonable efforts to secure the vote of its
shareholders required under the FBCA and the Articles of
Incorporation of BFC and include in the Registration Statement
the recommendation of its Board of Directors in favor of the
Merger.
(c) BFC shall vote all of its shares of Woodbridge
Class A Common Stock and Woodbridge Class B Common
Stock at the Woodbridge Meeting in favor of this Agreement.
7.6 Registration Statement; Joint Proxy
Statement/Prospectus.
(a) As promptly as practicable after the date of this
Agreement, Woodbridge shall supply BFC with the information
pertaining to Woodbridge required by the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, as the case may be, for inclusion in the
Registration Statement and the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus
to be filed by BFC, which information shall not at each time the
Registration Statement is filed with the SEC, at the time it
becomes effective under the Securities Act, at the time the
Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus is mailed to Woodbridges
and BFCs shareholders or at the time of the Woodbridge
Meeting or the BFC Special Meeting, contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required
to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements
therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were
made, not misleading. No representation is or shall be made by
Woodbridge with respect to the accuracy of statements made in
the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus or the Registration
Statement based on information supplied by
Annex A-23
BFC or Merger Sub for inclusion in such documents. If before the
Effective Time, any event or circumstance relating to Woodbridge
or any of its Subsidiaries, or their respective officers,
managers or directors, is discovered by Woodbridge that should
be set forth in an amendment or a supplement to the Registration
Statement or Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus, Woodbridge shall
promptly inform BFC and shall provide to BFC appropriate
amendments or supplements to the Registration Statement or Joint
Proxy Statement/Prospectus, and the representations and
warranties of Woodbridge set forth in this
Section 7.6(a) as to the accuracy of such
information shall apply to all such amended or supplemented
information.
(b) As promptly as practicable after the date of this
Agreement, BFC shall provide Woodbridge with the information
pertaining to BFC and Merger Sub required by the Securities Act
or the Exchange Act, as the case may be, for inclusion in the
Registration Statement or the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus
to be filed by BFC, which information shall not at the time the
Registration Statement is filed with the SEC, at the time it
becomes effective under the Securities Act, at the time the
Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus is mailed to Woodbridges
and BFCs shareholders or at the time of the Woodbridge
Meeting or the BFC Special Meeting, contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required
to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements
therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were
made, not misleading. No representation is or shall be made by
BFC with respect to statements made in the Registration
Statement or Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus based on
information supplied by Woodbridge for inclusion in such
documents. If before the Effective Time, any event or
circumstance relating to BFC or any of its Subsidiaries, or
their respective officers, managers or directors, should be
discovered by BFC that should be set forth in an amendment or a
supplement to the Registration Statement or Joint Proxy
Statement/Prospectus, BFC shall promptly inform Woodbridge and
shall make appropriate amendments or supplements to the
Registration Statement or Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus, and
the representations and warranties of BFC set forth in this
Section 7.6(b) as to the accuracy of such
information shall apply to all such amended or supplemented
information.
(c) As promptly as practicable after the date of this
Agreement, BFC shall prepare and file with the SEC, with
Woodbridges assistance, the Registration Statement, which
shall include the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus of Woodbridge
and BFC relating to the Woodbridge Meeting and BFC Special
Meeting. BFC shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cause
the Registration Statement to become effective as promptly as
practicable after filing and shall use commercially reasonable
efforts to maintain the effectiveness of such Registration
Statement until all of the shares of BFC Class A Common
Stock have been issued and distributed in the Merger as
described in the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus. BFC shall
take any action required under applicable federal or state
securities Laws in connection with the issuance of shares of BFC
Class A Common Stock pursuant to the Merger. The Surviving
Company shall use commercially reasonable efforts to cause the
Woodbridge Class A Common Stock to be deregistered under
the Exchange Act as soon as practicable following the Effective
Time. Woodbridge shall furnish all information concerning
Woodbridge as BFC may reasonably request in connection with such
actions and the preparation of the Registration Statement,
including information in response to comments received from the
SEC. As promptly as practicable after the Registration Statement
becomes effective, Woodbridge shall mail the Joint Proxy
Statement/Prospectus to its shareholders and BFC shall mail the
Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus to its shareholders.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein,
neither the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus nor the
Registration Statement nor any amendment or supplement thereto
shall be filed or mailed without the consent of both BFC and
Woodbridge, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld.
7.7 Employee Benefit
Plans. As appropriate, Woodbridges
Board of Directors shall adopt a resolution to discontinue the
sale or contribution (for any applicable period that has not yet
commenced) of Woodbridge Class A Common Stock (and
Class B Common Stock) pursuant to any Woodbridge Plan
subject to Section 401(a) of the Code, or otherwise shall
cause such discontinuance.
7.8 Indemnification.
(a) After the Effective Time, the Surviving Company shall
indemnify, defend and hold harmless each Person who is now, or
who has been at any time before the date hereof or who becomes
before the Effective Time, an officer or director of Woodbridge
(the Indemnified Parties) against all losses,
claims, damages,
Annex A-24
costs, expenses (including reasonable attorneys fees),
liabilities or judgments or amounts that are paid in settlement
(which settlement shall require the prior written consent of
BFC, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld) of or in
connection with any claim, action, suit, proceeding or
investigation, whether civil, criminal, or administrative (each
a Claim), in which an Indemnified Party is,
or is threatened to be made, a party based in whole or in part
on or arising in whole or in part out of the fact that such
person is or was a director or officer of Woodbridge if such
Claim pertains to any matter or fact arising, existing or
occurring before the Effective Time (including, without
limitation, the Merger) regardless of whether such Claim is
asserted or claimed before, at or after the Effective Time (the
Indemnified Liabilities), to the same extent
provided for under the FBCA in effect as of the date hereof and
under the Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws of Woodbridge as
in effect on the date hereof. The Surviving Company shall pay
expenses in advance of the final disposition of any such action
or proceeding to each Indemnified Party to the same extent
provided for under the FBCA in effect on the date hereof and
under the Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws of Woodbridge as
in effect on the date hereof upon receipt of any undertaking
required by applicable Law or the Articles of Incorporation or
Bylaws of Woodbridge as in effect on the date hereof. Any
Indemnified Party wishing to claim indemnification under this
Section 7.8(a), upon learning of any Claim, shall
immediately notify BFC (but the failure to so notify BFC shall
not relieve it from any liability which it may have under this
Section 7.8(a) except to the extent such failure
prejudices BFC) and shall deliver to BFC any undertaking
required by applicable Law. The Surviving Company shall ensure,
to the extent permitted under applicable Law, that all
limitations of liability existing in favor of the Indemnified
Parties as provided in the Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws
of Woodbridge as in effect on the date hereof, or allowed under
applicable Law as in effect on the date hereof with respect to
Indemnified Liabilities, shall survive the consummation of the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement.
(b) For a period of six (6) years from and after the
Effective Time, the Surviving Company shall cause to be
maintained in effect the current policies of directors and
officers liability insurance maintained by Woodbridge
(provided that the Surviving Company may substitute therefor
policies of at least the same coverage and amount containing
terms and conditions which are substantially no less
advantageous, or in lieu thereof obtain single limit tail
coverage providing at least the same coverage and amount
containing terms and conditions which are substantially no less
advantageous for such period (which shall be purchased by
Woodbridge immediately prior to Closing upon the request of
BFC)) with respect to claims arising from facts or events which
occurred before the Effective Time.
(c) The obligations of the Surviving Company provided under
paragraphs (a) and (b) of this Section 7.8
are intended to be enforceable against the Surviving Company
directly by the Indemnified Parties and shall be binding on all
successors and permitted assigns of the Surviving Company.
7.9 Further
Assurances. Subject to the terms and
conditions herein provided, each of the parties hereto agrees to
use all reasonable efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all
action and to do, or cause to be done, all things necessary,
proper or advisable on the part of such party, to consummate and
make effective the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
at the earliest practicable date, including obtaining all
required consents, approvals, waivers, exemptions, amendments
and authorizations, giving all notices, and making or effecting
all filings, registrations, applications, designations and
declarations, including, but not limited to, those described in
the schedules to this Agreement, and each party shall cooperate
fully with the other (including by providing any necessary
information) with respect to the foregoing. In case, at any
time, any further action is necessary or desirable to carry out
the purposes of this Agreement, the proper officers
and/or
directors of BFC or Woodbridge will use all reasonable efforts
to take all such necessary action.
7.10 Tax Treatment.
(a) The parties shall use reasonable best efforts to cause
the Merger to qualify as a reorganization under
Section 368(a) of the Code and shall use reasonable best
efforts not to, and not to permit or cause any Affiliate or any
of BFCs Subsidiaries to, take any action or cause any
action to be taken which would cause the Merger to fail to so
qualify as a reorganization under Section 368(a) of the
Code.
(b) Unless otherwise required by applicable Law, BFC,
Woodbridge and Merger Sub shall report the Merger as a
reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code.
Annex A-25
(c) The parties hereto shall cooperate and use their
reasonable efforts in order to obtain the opinion of Stearns
Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson, P.A.
described in Section 8.1(h) hereof. In connection
therewith, Woodbridge, BFC and Merger Sub shall deliver to
Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson,
P.A. representation letters as may be reasonably requested by
such law firm, dated and executed as of the date of such opinion.
7.11 Comfort
Letters. Woodbridge and BFC will each use
their commercially reasonable efforts to cause to be delivered
to each other reasonable and customary letters from their
respective independent accountants, the first letter dated a
date within two (2) Business Days before the effective date
of the Registration Statement and the second letter dated a date
within two (2) Business Days before the date of the BFC
Special Meeting and the Woodbridge Meeting, as applicable, in
form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the recipient and
customary in scope and substance for comfort letters delivered
by independent accountants in connection with registration
statements similar to the Registration Statement.
7.12 Shareholder
Litigation. The parties shall cooperate and
consult with one another, to the fullest extent possible, in
connection with any shareholder litigation against any of them
or any of their respective directors or officers with respect to
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. In furtherance
of, and without in any way limiting, the foregoing, each of the
parties shall use its respective commercially reasonable efforts
to prevail in such litigation (or, with the consent of the other
parties, settle such litigation) so as to permit the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
in the manner contemplated by this Agreement. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, no party shall compromise or settle any
litigation commenced against it or its directors or officers
relating to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated
hereby (including the Merger) without the other parties
prior written consent, which shall not be unreasonably withheld
or delayed.
7.13 HSR Act. If required,
BFC and Woodbridge will (a) take all commercially
reasonable actions necessary to file as soon as practicable
notifications under the HSR Act with respect to the Merger, if
required, (b) comply at the earliest practicable date with
any request for additional information received from the Federal
Trade Commission or Antitrust Division of the Department of
Justice pursuant to the HSR Act, and (c) request early
termination of all applicable waiting periods.
7.14 Appointment of Directors and Executive
Officer. BFC shall use its best efforts to
cause (a) the directors of Woodbridge who are not already
directors of BFC as of the date of this Agreement as well as
Messrs. Seth Wise and Jarett Levan to be appointed to the
Board of Directors of BFC and (b) Mr. Seth Wise to be
appointed Executive Vice President of BFC.
7.15 Cancellation of Woodbridge
Options. Prior to the Effective Time,
Woodbridge shall cause to be taken such actions as are necessary
under the Woodbridge Option Plan and all other applicable
instruments to cancel, as of the Effective Time, all Woodbridge
Options outstanding at the Effective Time.
7.16 Cancellation of Woodbridge Rights
Agreement. Prior to the Effective Time,
Woodbridge shall cause to be taken such actions as are necessary
to terminate the Woodbridge Rights Agreement and cause the
Woodbridge Rights Agreement to be inapplicable to the
transactions contemplated hereby, including, without limitation,
the Merger.
ARTICLE VIII
CONDITIONS
PRECEDENT TO OBLIGATIONS
8.1 Conditions to Each Partys Obligation
to Effect the Merger. The respective
obligations of each party to consummate and effect the Merger
and the other transactions contemplated hereby shall be subject
to the satisfaction prior to or at the Closing of the following
conditions, each of which may only be waived in writing in whole
or in part by mutual agreement of all of the parties, to the
extent permitted by Law:
(a) This Agreement, the Merger and the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement shall have received the requisite
approval and authorization of the shareholders of Woodbridge
under the FBCA, and
Annex A-26
the transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall have
received the requisite approval and authorization of the
shareholders of BFC under the Articles of Incorporation of BFC.
(b) No litigation, arbitration or other proceeding shall be
pending by or before any court, arbitration panel or
Governmental Entity which seeks to enjoin or prohibit the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement
(other than a proceeding instituted by Woodbridge or any of its
Subsidiaries, directors, officers, employees or agents).
(c) No Law shall have been enacted or promulgated by any
Governmental Entity which prohibits the consummation of the
Merger, and there shall be no Order of a Governmental Entity
precluding consummation of the Merger.
(d) The SEC shall have declared the Registration Statement
effective. No stop order suspending the effectiveness of the
Registration Statement or any part thereof shall have been
issued and no proceeding for that purpose, and no similar
proceeding in respect of the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus,
shall have been initiated or threatened in writing by the SEC,
and all comments and requests for additional information on the
part of the SEC shall have been responded to and complied with
as required.
(e) All consents, approvals, Orders or authorizations of,
or registrations, declarations or filings with, any Governmental
Entity required by or with respect to Woodbridge, BFC or any of
their respective Subsidiaries in connection with the execution
and delivery of this Agreement or the consummation of the Merger
and other transactions contemplated hereby shall have been
obtained or made, including, without limitation, the expiration
or termination of any notice and waiting period under the HSR
Act, if applicable, other than consents, approvals, Orders,
authorizations, registrations, declarations or filings which if
not made or obtained could not reasonably be expected to result
in a Material Adverse Effect on BFC or the Surviving Company
after consummation of the Merger. All of such consents and
approvals shall have been obtained without the imposition of any
conditions which, in the opinion of Woodbridge and BFC, could
reasonably be expected to materially adversely affect the
operations of BFC or the Surviving Company after consummation of
the Merger.
(f) All written consents, approvals, interim approvals,
assignments, waivers, Orders, authorizations or other
certificates necessary to provide for the continuation in full
force and effect of the Woodbridge Material Contracts and all
other material agreements set forth on Schedule 5.9
and all of the existing Permits of Woodbridge and for Woodbridge
to consummate the Merger and other transactions contemplated
hereby shall have been received, except where the failure to
receive such consents, approvals, interim approvals,
assignments, waivers, Orders, authorizations or certificates
could not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be
expected to have a Material Adverse Effect on Woodbridge or
could not adversely affect the ability of the Surviving Company
to continue to conduct the business of Woodbridge as it has been
historically conducted by Woodbridge.
(g) BFC and Woodbridge shall each have received the written
opinion of Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff &
Sitterson, P.A., in form and substance reasonably acceptable to
each of them, dated as of the date of Closing to the effect
that, on the basis of the facts, representations and assumptions
set forth or referred to in such opinion, for U.S. Federal
income tax purposes, the Merger will constitute a
reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Code. In rendering such opinion,
Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson,
P.A. shall be entitled to rely upon customary assumptions and
representations reasonably satisfactory to such firm, including
representations set forth in certificates of officers of BFC,
Merger Sub and Woodbridge, in form and substance reasonably
satisfactory to BFC, Merger Sub and Woodbridge, respectively.
8.2 Conditions to Woodbridges Obligation
to Effect the Merger. The obligations of
Woodbridge to consummate and effect the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated hereby are further subject to the
fulfillment of the following conditions, any of which may be
waived only in writing in whole or in part by Woodbridge:
(a) The representations and warranties of BFC and Merger
Sub set forth in this Agreement that are qualified by
materiality or Material Adverse Effect shall
have been true and correct as of the date of
Annex A-27
this Agreement and shall be true and correct as of the Effective
Time as if made on and as of the Effective Time, and the
representations and warranties of BFC and Merger Sub contained
in this Agreement that are not so qualified shall have been true
and correct in all material respects as of the date of this
Agreement and shall be true and correct in all material respects
as of the Effective Time as if made on and as of the Effective
Time except, in each case, for those representations and
warranties which address matters only as of a particular date
(which shall remain true and correct or true and correct in all
material respects, as applicable, as of such date).
(b) Each of BFC and Merger Sub shall have performed in all
material respects all obligations and complied in all material
respects with all covenants required by this Agreement to be
performed or complied with by it at or prior to the Effective
Time; provided, however, that this condition shall
not apply to any agreement or covenant of BFC or Merger Sub if
the failure by such party to so perform or comply is
attributable to Woodbridge.
(c) The opinion of Allen C. Ewing & Co. referred
to in Section 5.13 hereof shall not have been
withdrawn, revoked or materially modified.
(d) Each of BFC and Merger Sub shall have delivered to
Woodbridge a certificate, dated the Effective Time and signed by
their respective Chief Executive Officers and Chief Financial
Officers, certifying the satisfaction of the conditions set
forth in Sections 8.2(a) and (b) in all
respects.
(e) Between the date hereof and the Effective Time, BFC
shall not have recorded, or reasonably expect to record,
other-than-temporary
impairment charges in an aggregate amount greater than
$15,000,000 except for
other-than-temporary
impairment charges relating to an asset owned by Woodbridge or
any of Woodbridges Subsidiaries or relating to BFCs
investment in Woodbridge.
8.3 Conditions to BFCs and Merger
Subs Obligation to Effect the
Merger. The obligations of BFC and Merger Sub
to consummate and effect the Merger and the other transactions
contemplated hereby are further subject to the fulfillment of
the following conditions, any of which may be waived only in
writing in whole or in part by BFC or Merger Sub:
(a) The representations and warranties of Woodbridge set
forth in this Agreement that are qualified by materiality or
Material Adverse Effect shall have been true
and correct as of the date of this Agreement and shall be true
and correct as of the Effective Time as if made on and as of the
Effective Time, and the representations and warranties of
Woodbridge contained in this Agreement that are not so qualified
shall have been true and correct in all material respects as of
the date of this Agreement and shall be true and correct in all
material respects as of the Effective Time as if made on and as
of the Effective Time except for those representations and
warranties which address matters only as of a particular date
(which shall remain true and correct as of such date).
(b) Woodbridge shall have performed all obligations and
complied with all covenants required by this Agreement to be
performed or complied with by it at or prior to the Effective
Time; provided, however, that this condition shall
not apply to any agreement or covenant of Woodbridge if the
failure by Woodbridge to so perform or comply is attributable to
BFC.
(c) Woodbridge shall have delivered to BFC a certificate,
dated the Closing Date and signed by its President and Chief
Financial Officer, certifying the satisfaction of the conditions
set forth in Sections 8.3(a) and (b).
(d) The opinion of JMP Securities LLC referred to in
Section 4.18 hereof shall not have been withdrawn,
revoked or materially modified.
(e) Holders of not more than 10% of the outstanding shares
of Woodbridge Class A Common Stock shall have duly and
validly exercised, or remain entitled to exercise, appraisal
rights in connection with the Merger in accordance with the FBCA.
Annex A-28
(f) Between the date hereof and the Effective Time,
Woodbridge shall not have recorded, or reasonably expect to
record,
other-than-temporary
impairment charges in an aggregate amount greater than
$15,000,000.
ARTICLE IX
TERMINATION,
AMENDMENT AND WAIVER
9.1 Termination of the
Agreement. This Agreement may be terminated
and the Merger and transactions contemplated by this Agreement
may be abandoned at any time prior to the Effective Time
(whether before or after the approval of this Agreement by
Woodbridges shareholders), as follows:
(a) by mutual written consent of Woodbridge and BFC.
(b) by either of Woodbridge or BFC:
(i) (A) if Woodbridges shareholders do not
approve the Merger Agreement by the requisite vote at the
Woodbridge Meeting (including any adjournment or postponement
thereof) or (B) if BFCs shareholders do not approve
the Merger and the related transactions by the requisite vote at
the BFC Special Meeting (including any adjournment or
postponement thereof);
(ii) if any Governmental Entity shall have issued an Order,
decree or ruling or taken any other action (which Order, decree,
ruling or other action the parties hereto shall use their
reasonable efforts to lift), which permanently restrains,
enjoins or otherwise prohibits consummation of the Merger and
such Order, decree, ruling or other action shall have become
final and non appealable;
(iii) if there shall be any Law enacted, promulgated or
issued and deemed applicable to the Merger by any Governmental
Entity which would make consummation of the Merger illegal;
(iv) if the Merger shall not have been consummated by
September 15, 2009; provided, however, that this
deadline shall be extended to December 15, 2009 in the
event the parties are proceeding in good faith with respect to
the consummation of the Merger (which good faith requirement
includes, without limitation, the requirement that the parties
first file the Registration Statement with the SEC on or before
July 20, 2009); or
(v) if (A) the Special Committee
and/or
Woodbridges Board of Directors or BFCs Board of
Directors shall have finally determined to approve or recommend
a Superior Proposal to Woodbridges or BFCs
shareholders, as applicable, after complying with
Section 7.4 or (B) the Special Committee
and/or
Woodbridges Board of Directors or BFCs Board of
Directors withholds or withdraws its recommendation of this
Agreement or the Merger or modifies or changes such
recommendation in a manner adverse to the other party;
(c) by Woodbridge if:
(i) BFC or Merger Sub shall have breached in any material
respect any of their respective representations, warranties,
covenants or other agreements contained in this Agreement, which
breach (A) cannot be or has not been cured, in all material
respects, within 15 days after the giving of written notice
to BFC or Merger Sub, as applicable, and (B) would result
in the failure to satisfy a condition set forth in
Section 8.2; or
(ii) Allen C. Ewing & Co. has withdrawn, revoked,
annulled or materially modified its fairness opinion.
(d) by BFC if:
(i) Woodbridge shall have breached in any material respect
any representation, warranty, covenant or other agreement
contained in this Agreement, which breach (i) cannot be or
has not been cured, in all material respects, within
15 days after the giving of written notice to Woodbridge
and (ii) would result in the failure to satisfy a condition
set forth in Section 8.3;
Annex A-29
(ii) JMP Securities LLC has withdrawn, revoked, annulled or
materially modified its fairness opinion; or
(iii) a tender offer or exchange offer for ten percent
(10%) or more of the outstanding shares of Woodbridge
Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock shall
have been commenced or a registration statement or statement on
Schedule TO with respect thereto shall have been filed
(other than by BFC or an Affiliate thereof (other than
Woodbridge or any of its Subsidiaries, directors, officers,
employees or agents)) and the Board of Directors of Woodbridge
shall, notwithstanding its obligations hereunder, have
(A) recommended that Woodbridges shareholders tender
their shares in such tender or exchange offer or
(B) publicly announced its intention to take no position
with respect to such tender offer.
9.2 Effect of
Termination. If this Agreement is terminated
pursuant to this Article IX, written notice thereof
shall promptly be given by the party electing such termination
to the other party and, subject to the expiration of the cure
periods provided in Sections 9.1(c) and
9.1(d)(i) above, if any, this Agreement shall terminate
without further actions by the parties and no party shall have
any further obligations under this Agreement except that nothing
in this Section 9.2 shall relieve a breaching party
for liability for its willful or intentional breach of this
Agreement.
9.3 Amendment and
Waiver. This Agreement may be amended or
modified in whole or in part at any time only by a writing
signed by the parties hereto. Any term, condition or provision
of this Agreement may be waived in writing at any time by the
party which is entitled to the benefits thereof.
ARTICLE X
MISCELLANEOUS
10.1 Survival of the Representations and
Warranties. No investigation by the parties
hereto made heretofore or hereafter shall affect the
representations and warranties of the parties which are
contained herein, and each such representation and warranty
shall survive such investigation. The representations and
warranties of the parties hereto contained in this Agreement and
in any certificate delivered pursuant hereto or in any exhibit
or schedule to this Agreement shall not survive the Effective
Time.
10.2 Payment of Expenses.
(a) Except as set forth in this Section 10.2,
all fees and expenses incurred in connection with this Agreement
and the transactions contemplated hereby shall be paid by the
party incurring such expenses, whether or not the Merger is
consummated.
(b) BFC and Woodbridge each agree to pay one-half
(1/2)
of any printing, mailing and filing expenses of the Registration
Statement, the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus and any
applicable pre-merger notification and report forms under the
HSR Act.
10.3 Binding Effect. Neither
this Agreement nor any rights, duties or obligations hereunder
shall be assignable by Woodbridge, in whole or in part, and any
attempted assignment in violation of this prohibition shall be
null and void. Subject to the foregoing, all of the terms and
provisions hereof shall be binding upon, and inure to the
benefit of, the successors and permitted assigns of the parties
hereto.
10.4 Governing Law. This
Agreement will be governed and enforced in all respects,
including validity, interpretation and effect, by the Laws of
the State of Florida without giving effect to its principles of
conflicts of laws.
10.5 Counterparts. This
Agreement may be executed in several counterparts and one or
more separate documents, all of which together shall constitute
one and the same instrument with the same force and effect as
though all of the parties had executed the same document.
Delivery of an executed counterpart signature page to this
Agreement by facsimile or other electronic transmission shall be
effective as delivery of an original executed counterpart
signature page.
Annex A-30
10.6 Notices. All notices
and other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall
be deemed to have been duly received (i) on the date given
if delivered personally or by facsimile (ii) one day after
being sent by nationally recognized overnight delivery service
or (iii) five days after having been mailed by registered
or certified mail (postage prepaid, return receipt requested),
to the parties at the following addresses (or at such other
address for a party as shall be specified by like notice):
If either to BFC or Merger Sub, addressed to:
BFC Financial Corporation
2100 West Cypress Creek Road
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309
Attn: Alan B. Levan, Chief Executive Officer
Facsimile:
(954) 940-5050
With copies addressed to:
Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler
Alhadeff & Sitterson, P.A.
150 West Flagler Street, Suite 2200
Miami, Florida 33130
Attn: Alison W. Miller, Esq.
Facsimile:
(305) 789-3395
If to Woodbridge, addressed to:
Woodbridge Holdings Corporation
2100 West Cypress Creek Road
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309
Attn: Seth Wise, President
Facsimile:
(954) 940-4970
and to
Joel Levy, Chairman of the Special Committee
Adler Group
1400 Northwest 107th Avenue
Miami, Florida
33172-2704
Facsimile:
(305) 418-1001
With a copy addressed to (which shall not constitute notice):
Akerman Senterfitt, P.A.
One Southeast Third Avenue
25th Floor
Miami, Florida
33131-1714
Attn: Stephen K. Roddenberry, Esq.
Facsimile:
(305) 374-5095
10.7 Entire Agreement;
Assignment. All exhibits and schedules
referred to in this Agreement are integral parts hereof, and
this Agreement, together with such exhibits and schedules,
constitutes the entire agreement among the parties hereto with
respect to the matters contained herein and therein, and
supersedes all prior agreements and understandings between the
parties with respect thereto. This Agreement shall not be
assigned or delegated (whether pursuant to a merger, by
operation of Law or otherwise).
10.8 Headings. The section
headings contained in this Agreement are inserted for
convenience only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or
interpretation of this Agreement.
10.9 Knowledge of the
Parties. Where any representation or warranty
contained in this Agreement is expressly qualified by reference
to the knowledge of any of the parties hereto, each of the
parties hereto
Annex A-31
acknowledges and confirms that it has made reasonable inquiry as
to the matters that are the subject of such representations and
warranties. Where reference is made to a partys knowledge
or any similar phrase, such reference shall be deemed to include
the respective executive officers and directors of such party
and each of its Subsidiaries, all of whom shall be deemed to
have conducted the inquiry required in this
Section 10.9.
10.10 Attorneys
Fees. In any action or proceeding brought to
enforce any provision of this Agreement, or where any provision
hereof is validly asserted as a defense, the successful party
shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys fees and
expenses through all appeals in addition to any other remedy.
10.11 No Third Party
Beneficiary. Except as permitted in
Section 7.8 hereof, nothing expressed or implied in
this Agreement is intended, or shall be construed, to confer
upon or give any Person other than the parties hereto and their
respective heirs, personal representatives, legal
representatives, successors and permitted assigns, any rights or
remedies under or by reason of this Agreement.
10.12 Injunctive Relief. It
is possible that remedies at law may be inadequate and,
therefore, the parties hereto shall be entitled to equitable
relief including, without limitation, injunctive relief,
specific performance or other equitable remedies in addition to
all other remedies provided hereunder or available to the
parties hereto at law or in equity.
10.13 Jurisdiction;
Venue. Any suit, action or proceeding against
any party with respect to this Agreement or any judgment entered
by any court in respect of this Agreement shall be brought in a
federal or state court in Broward County, Florida, and the
parties hereto accept the exclusive jurisdiction of those courts
for the purpose of any such suit, action or proceeding. In
addition, the parties irrevocably waive, to the fullest extent
permitted by law, any objection which they may now or hereafter
have to the laying of venue of any suit, action or proceeding
arising out of or relating to this Agreement, or any judgment
entered by any court in respect hereof brought in Broward
County, Florida.
10.14 Severability. If any
term or provision of this Agreement is invalid, illegal or
incapable of being enforced by any rule of law or public policy,
all other conditions and provisions of this Agreement shall
nevertheless remain in full force and effect so long as the
economic or legal substance of the Merger and the other
transactions contemplated hereby is not affected in any manner
materially adverse to any party. Upon such determination that
any term or other provision is invalid, illegal or incapable of
being enforced, the parties hereto shall negotiate in good faith
to modify this Agreement so as to effect the original intent of
the parties as closely as possible in a mutually acceptable
manner in order that such transactions be consummated as
originally contemplated to the fullest extent possible.
10.15 Waiver. Any waiver by
any party hereto of any of its rights or remedies under this
Agreement or of any breach or violation of or default under this
Agreement must be in writing and signed by the party to be
charged thereunder and shall not constitute a waiver of any of
its other rights or remedies or of any other or future breach,
violation or default hereunder.
10.16 Special
Committee. Except as may be required by
applicable Law, prior to the Effective Time, any consent, waiver
or other determination to be made, or action to be taken, by
Woodbridge under this Agreement shall be made or taken only upon
the approval of the Special Committee.
10.17 Time of the
Essence. Time is of the essence in the
performance of all agreements, obligations and covenants by the
parties under this Agreement.
[SIGNATURE
PAGE FOLLOWS]
Annex A-32
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this
Agreement as of the date first above written.
BFC FINANCIAL CORPORATION,
a Florida corporation
Alan B. Levan,
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
WDG MERGER SUB, LLC,
a Florida limited liability company
Alan B. Levan,
Manager
WOODBRIDGE HOLDINGS CORPORATION,
a Florida corporation
Seth M. Wise,
President
Annex A-33
Annex B
Opinion
of JMP Securities LLC
July 2,
2009
PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL
Board of Directors
BFC Financial Corporation
2100 West Cypress Creek Road
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
Members of the Board:
We understand that BFC Financial Corporation (BFC),
Woodbridge Holdings Corporation (Woodbridge) and WDG
Merger Sub, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of BFC (Merger
Sub) propose to enter into an Agreement and Plan of Merger
substantially in the form of the draft dated July 1, 2009
(the Agreement), which provides, among other things,
for the merger of Merger Sub with and into Woodbridge with
Merger Sub to be the surviving company in the merger (the
Merger). Pursuant to the Agreement, and subject to
the exceptions therein, each share of Woodbridge Class A
common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the
Effective Time of the Merger, other than shares held by BFC,
Merger Sub or Woodbridge and certain other shares specified in
the Agreement, will be converted into the right to receive
3.47 shares of BFC Class A common stock (the
Exchange Ratio). The terms and conditions of the
Merger are more fully set forth in the Agreement which you have
provided to us. Terms used herein as defined terms, but which
are not defined herein, shall have the meanings ascribed to such
terms in the Agreement.
You have requested our opinion as to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, of the Exchange Ratio to the
stockholders of BFC. For purposes of the opinion set forth
herein, we have:
(i) reviewed certain publicly available financial
statements and other business and financial information of BFC
and Woodbridge;
(ii) reviewed the reported prices and trading activity for
BFC and Woodbridge Class A common stock;
(iii) compared the financial performance of BFC and the
prices and trading activity of BFC Class A common stock
with that of certain other publicly traded
companies that we believe are generally comparable to BFC;
(iv) compared the financial performance of Woodbridge and
the prices and trading of Woodbridge Class A common stock
with that of certain other publicly traded
companies that we believe are generally comparable to Woodbridge;
(v) reviewed the financial terms, to the extent publicly
available, of certain merger transactions that we believe are
generally comparable to the transaction contemplated by the
Agreement;
(vi) participated in discussions among representatives of
BFC and Woodbridge and their legal advisors;
(vii) reviewed the Agreement and certain other related
documents which you have provided to us; and
Annex B-1
(viii) considered such other factors, and performed such
other analyses, as we have deemed appropriate.
We have assumed and relied upon without independent verification
the accuracy and completeness of the information supplied or
otherwise made available to us by BFC and Woodbridge for the
purposes of this opinion. We have further relied upon the
assurance of the management of BFC and Woodbridge that they are
not aware of any facts that would make any of such information
inaccurate or misleading. In addition, we have assumed that the
proposed Merger will be consummated in accordance with the terms
set forth in the Agreement without: the occurrence of any
Material Adverse Effect; the occurrence of any litigation,
arbitration or other proceeding which enjoins or prohibits the
consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Agreement;
the enactment of any Law which prohibits the consummation of the
proposed Merger; or the issuance of any order which precludes
consummation of the proposed Merger. We have assumed that in
connection with the receipt of all the necessary governmental,
regulatory or other approvals, permits, consents and orders
required for the proposed Merger, no delays, limitations,
conditions, restrictions or orders will be imposed that would
have an adverse effect on the contemplated benefits expected to
be derived in the proposed Merger. We are not legal, tax or
regulatory advisors and have relied upon, without independent
verification, the assessment of BFC and their legal, tax or
regulatory advisors with respect to legal, tax or regulatory
matters. We have not made any independent valuation or appraisal
of the assets or liabilities of BFC or Woodbridge, nor have we
been furnished with any such appraisals. Our opinion is
necessarily based on financial, economic, market and other
conditions as in effect on, and the information made available
to us as of, the date hereof. Events occurring after the date
hereof may affect this opinion and the assumptions used in
preparing it, and we do not assume any obligation to update,
revise or reaffirm this opinion.
We were not requested to consider, and our opinion does not
address, BFCs underlying business decision to enter into
the Agreement, or the relative merits of the proposed Merger as
compared to any alternative business strategies that might exist
for BFC or the effect of any other transaction in which BFC
might engage. We were not requested to consider, and our opinion
does not address, the non-financial terms of the Agreement, nor
does it address the terms of any of the related agreements to be
entered into by the parties in connection with the proposed
Merger. In addition, we express no view or opinion as to the
fairness of the amount or nature of, or any other aspects
relating to, the compensation to any officers, directors or
employees of any parties to the proposed Merger or class of such
persons, relative to the Merger consideration or otherwise.
We are acting as financial advisor to the Board of Directors of
BFC in connection with the proposed transaction set forth in the
Agreement and will receive a fee for providing this opinion. In
addition, BFC has agreed to indemnify us against certain
liabilities arising out of our engagement. In the ordinary
course of our trading, brokerage, investment management and
financing activities, we, or our affiliates, may at any time
hold long or short positions, and may trade or otherwise effect
transactions, for our own account or the accounts of customers,
in equity securities of BFC or any other company or any currency
or commodity that may be involved in this transaction. We, and
our affiliates, in the ordinary course of business have from
time to time provided, and in the future may continue to
provide, investment banking services to BFC and have received
fees for the rendering of such services. The issuance of this
opinion was approved by the Opinions Committee of JMP Securities
LLC.
Annex B-2
It is understood that this letter is for the information of the
Board of Directors of BFC only and may not be used for any other
purpose without our prior written consent, except that this
opinion may be included in its entirety in any filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission required to be made by BFC in
respect of the transaction which is the subject of the Agreement
if such inclusion is required by applicable law. In addition, we
express no opinion or recommendation as to how the stockholders
of BFC should vote at the stockholders meeting to be held
in connection with the proposed Merger.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion
on the date hereof that the Exchange Ratio pursuant to the
Agreement is fair from a financial point of view to the
stockholders of BFC.
Very truly yours,
Annex B-3
Annex C
Opinion
of Allen C. Ewing & Co.
July 2, 2009
Special Committee
Board of Directors
Woodbridge Holdings Corporation
2100 West Cypress Creek Blvd.
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309
Members of the Committee:
BFC Financial Corporation (BFC) has extended an
offer to Woodbridge Holdings Corporation (WHC) to
merge the two companies via a tax-free reorganization (Sec.
368) involving an exchange of common shares. BFC currently
owns 100% of the Class B shares of WHC, which have a
greater number of votes per share than the Class A shares,
and BFC also owns 23.6% of WHCs Class A shares. The
votes provided by BFCs ownership of these combined shares
provides it with approximately 59% of the voting shares of WHC,
and the proposed merger would increase BFCs ownership of
WHC to 100%.
Under the proposed terms of merger, WHC will merge with and into
WDG Merger Sub, a wholly owned subsidiary of BFC, with Merger
Sub to be the surviving company. Each Class A common share
of WHC, excluding any dissenting shares and those owned by BFC,
will be converted into 3.47 Class A shares of BFC.
Subsequent to the Merger, all WHC Class A and Class B
shares owned by BFC will be cancelled. The Exchange Ratio of
3.47 is based on the book values of the two companies as of
March 31, 2009. The other terms and conditions of the
proposed merger are set forth in the Agreement and Plan of
Merger dated July 2, 2009.
We have been requested by the Committee to render our opinion
with respect to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to
the WHC stockholders of the consideration to be offered by BFC
to such stockholders. Our opinion does not address WHCs
underlying business decision to proceed with the proposed merger
and our opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any WHC
stockholders as to how such stockholders should vote with
respect to the proposed merger. We also do not express any
opinion as to the prices at which the shares of BFC will trade
after the Merger.
In arriving at our opinion, we reviewed and analyzed
(i) the Agreement and Plan of Merger, (ii) the audited
balance sheets, income statements, and
Form 10-Ks
of both companies for the years ended December 31, 2007 and
2008, (iii) the unaudited balance sheets, income
statements, and
Form 10-Qs
for the periods ended March 31, 2008 and 2009,
(iv) financial and operating information provided by the
two companies with respect to their operations and those of
their consolidated subsidiaries, including the operations of
BankAtlantic Bancorp, Inc. and BankAtlantic, (v) publicly
available information concerning both companies, and
(vi) prices and trading volumes of the publicly held stocks
of both companies over the past twelve months.
We held discussions with the management of both companies to
discuss the current condition and future outlook for each, and
we had meetings with the management, loan underwriting staff,
and credit committees of BankAtlantic, BFCs largest
investment.
We observed the effect that the current recessionary environment
has had and will continue to have on the revenues, profitability
and asset values of both companies. We examined
BankAtlantics ability to maintain regulatory capital
levels during the continuing recession, and we examined the
current and projected negative cash flows for WHC which were
created by its depressed revenues resulting from the severe
recession in the housing and land development industries.
We observed that in merging with BFC, the WHC stockholders would
be exchanging 50% of their ownership of WHCs various
assets for a 50% interest in BFCs assets, which consist
primarily of shares of
Annex C-1
BankAtlantic Bancorp and Benihana, Inc. The resulting
diversification of WHCs assets is consistent with the WHC
Boards stated objective of diversification for its
shareholders.
The economic recovery of the land development assets of WHC is
likely to take longer than the recovery of banks, including
BankAtlantic. If so, the proposed merger will allow the WHC
stockholders to benefit earlier and from more diversified
revenue producing sources when an improving economy occurs.
The two companies are under common control and many staff
functions have already been combined. There should be modest
operating savings created by the merger and the resulting larger
number of shares of BFC to be outstanding may improve the
marketability of its shares.
In examining the use of the book values of each company as the
basis of the Exchange Ratio, we observed that both companies
operated at a loss in 2007 and 2008 and are projected to do so
in 2009. Accordingly, an exchange ratio based on earnings is not
feasible. We also observed that with the current volatile
markets and adverse trends in real estate land values and bank
values, which are the primary assets of the two companies, it
would be very difficult to calculate a credible exchange ratio
based on estimated and volatile market values of their assets.
We observed that there have been very few, if any, recent
M&A transactions between bank holding companies and real
estate development companies whose transaction pricing might be
used as a comparison for this proposed transaction. In view of
these factors, we determined that an exchange ratio based on the
book values of the two companies, as proposed by BFC, is the
most feasible method determining the Exchange Ratio for the
proposed merger.
WHC and BFC both have public markets for their shares. BFC
Class A shares (BFCF) and WHCs Class A shares
(WDGH) trade on the NASDAQ markets in very light volumes.
BFCs average trading volume per day is 6,000 shares
and WHCs is 2,000 shares. While the market prices of
thinly traded stocks do not necessarily reflect the fair market
value (FMV) of a companys shares, on a given
day, they reflect, over time, the major trends in values created
either by economic conditions
and/or the
operations of their respective companies as have the shares of
WHC and BFC.
We observed that the average share prices for the two companies
for the month of June were $1.32 and $0.41 for WHC and BFC,
respectively, and that their prices represented a ratio of 3.22.
These market prices for the shares of the two companies, during
this thirty day period, tended to support the Exchange Ratio of
3.47 as determined by the book value for book value exchange
ratio.
In arriving at our opinion, we have assumed and relied upon the
accuracy and completeness of the financial and other information
provided to us by the companies, and we have not preformed any
independent verification of such information. We have relied
upon the assurances of the management of both companies that
they are not aware of any circumstances that would make such
information inaccurate or misleading. We have not conducted a
physical inspection of the properties and facilities of WHC and
have not made any evaluation of its assets
and/or
liabilities. Our opinion, necessarily, is based upon the
economic conditions as they existed as of the date of this
letter.
We are an independent investment banking firm and our firm has
no ownership interest in WHC or BFC. No other party has
contributed professional assistance to the preparation of this
report, and our fees are not contingent upon the consummation of
the proposed merger. We have served as financial advisor to WHC
in connection with the proposed merger and have received a fee
from WHC for our services. A portion of our total fee will be
payable upon delivery of this written opinion. WHC has
indemnified us for certain liabilities that may arise out of the
rendering of this opinion.
The preparation of a fairness opinion involves various
determinations as to the most appropriate methods of financial
analysis and the application of those methods to the particular
circumstance. In arriving at our opinion, we did not attribute
any particular weight to any one factor but rather made
judgments as to the relative significance of each. We believe
that our opinion must be considered as a whole and that not
doing so could create a misleading view of the process
underlying our opinion. We encourage the WHC stockholders to
read the entire opinion.
Annex C-2
This letter has been prepared for the exclusive use of the Board
of Directors of WHC and may not be used for any other purpose
without our consent. However, it may be included in its entirety
in any filing with the SEC in connection with the proposed
merger.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion
as of this date that, from a financial point of view, the
consideration to be paid to the stockholders of WHC in the
proposed merger with BFC is fair to the WHC stockholders.
Sincerely,
/s/ Benjamin
C. Bishop, Jr.
Chairman
ALLEN C. EWING & CO.
Annex C-3
Annex D
FORM OF
ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
TO THE
AMENDED AND RESTATED
ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
OF
BFC FINANCIAL CORPORATION
The Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended,
of BFC FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a Florida corporation (the
Corporation), are hereby amended pursuant to the
provisions of Section 607.1006 of the Florida Business
Corporation Act, and such amendments are set forth as follows:
1. The first sentence of the second paragraph of
Article IV is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced
with the following:
Special Class A Common Stock. The Corporation is
authorized to issue 150,000,000 shares of Special
Class A Common Stock at a par value of $.01 per share.
2. The first paragraph of Section 6 of Article V
is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following:
1. Designation and Amount. The shares of such series
shall be designated Class A Common Stock (the
Class A Common Stock) and the number of shares
constituting such series shall be 150,000,000.
Annex D-1
Annex E
FORM OF
BY-LAWS
OF
BFC FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(as amended on December 3, 2007, February 11, 2008
and ,
2009)
ARTICLE I
MEETINGS OF
SHAREHOLDERS
Section 1. Annual
Meeting. The annual meeting of the shareholders
of this Corporation shall be held at the time and place
designated by the Board of Directors of the Corporation. The
annual meeting of the shareholders for any year shall be held no
later than thirteen months after the last preceding annual
meeting of shareholders. Business transacted at the annual
meeting shall include the election of directors of the
Corporation.
Section 2. Special
Meetings. Special meetings of the shareholders
shall be held when directed by the President or the Board of
Directors or when requested in writing by the holders of not
less than ten percent of all the shares entitled to vote at the
meeting. A special meeting requested by shareholders shall be
called for a date not less than ten nor more than sixty days
after the request is made, unless (in the case of the sixty day
maximum) the shareholders requesting the meeting designate a
later date and unless (in the case of the ten day minimum) the
number of shareholders constituting a quorum shall waive the ten
day minimum notice period. The call for the meeting shall be
issued by the Secretary, unless the President, Board of
Directors or shareholders requesting the meeting shall designate
another person to do so.
Section 3. Notice. Written
notice stating the place, day and hour of the meeting and, in
the case of a special meeting, the purpose or purposes for which
the meeting is called shall be delivered not less than ten nor
more than sixty days before the meeting, unless the number of
shareholders constituting a quorum shall waive the ten day
minimum notice period. The notice shall be delivered personally
or by first class mail by or at the direction of the President,
the Secretary or the officer or persons calling the meeting to
each shareholder of record entitled to vote at such meeting. If
mailed, such notice shall be deemed to be delivered when
deposited in the United States mail addressed to the shareholder
at his address as it appears on the stock transfer books of the
Corporation, with postage thereon prepaid.
Section 4. Place. Meetings
of shareholders may be held within or without the State of
Florida.
Section 5. Closing
of Transfer Books and Fixing Record Date. The Board of Directors
may fix in advance a date as the record date for the
determination of shareholders for any purpose. Such date in any
case to be not more than sixty days and, in case of a meeting of
shareholders, not less than ten days prior to the date on which
the particular action requiring such determination of
shareholders is to be taken.
Section 6. Voting
Record. The Secretary shall make, at least ten
days before each meeting of shareholders, a complete list of
shareholders entitled to vote at such meeting or any adjournment
thereof, with the address of and the number and class and
series, if any, of shares held by each. The list shall be kept
on file at the principal place of business of the Corporation
for a period of ten days prior to such meeting. Any shareholder
shall be entitled to inspect the list during usual business
hours and said list shall be available at the time and place of
the meeting and shall be subject to inspection by any
shareholder at any time during the meeting. This Section 6
shall not be applicable, however, if, as of the record date
established pursuant to Section 5 of Article I hereof,
the Corporation has less than six shareholders.
Section 7. Shareholder
Quorum and Voting.
a. A majority of the shares entitled to vote represented in
person or by proxy shall constitute a quorum at a meeting of
shareholders. When a specified item of business is required to
be voted on by a class or series of stock, a majority of the
shares of such class or series shall constitute a quorum for the
transaction of such item
Annex E-1
of business by that class or series. If a quorum is present, the
affirmative vote of a majority of the shares (or, when
applicable, a class or series of stock) represented at the
meeting and entitled to vote on the subject matter shall be the
act of the shareholders unless otherwise provided by the Florida
General Corporation Act, as amended from time to time.
b. After a quorum has been established at a
shareholders meeting, the subsequent withdrawal of
shareholders so as to reduce the number of shareholders entitled
to vote at the meeting below the number required for a quorum
shall not affect the validity of any action taken at the meeting
or any adjournment thereof.
Section 8. Voting
of Shares.
a. Each outstanding share of Common
and/or
Preferred stock shall have only such voting rights as are
specified by the Board of Directors in connection with the
designation of each series of Common Shares
and/or
Preferred Shares which is authorized and issued pursuant to
Article III of the Articles of Incorporation. If the voting
rights so designated with respect to each series provide for
more or less than one vote for any such share in the series,
every reference herein to a majority or other proportion of
shares shall refer to such a majority or other proportion of
votes entitled to be cast.
b. Treasury shares, shares of stock of this Corporation
owned by another corporation the majority of voting stock of
which is owned or controlled by this Corporation, and shares of
stock of this Corporation held by it in a fiduciary capacity
shall not be voted, directly or indirectly, at any meeting and
shall not be counted in determining the total number of
outstanding shares at any given time.
c. A shareholder may vote either in person or by proxy
executed in writing by the shareholder or his duly authorized
attorney-in-fact.
d. At each election for directors, every shareholder
entitled to vote at such election shall have the right to vote
in person or by proxy the number of shares owned by him for as
many persons as there are directors to be elected at that time
and for whose election he has a right to vote or, if cumulative
voting is authorized by the Board of Directors in connection
with the designation of any series of Common Shares
and/or
Preferred Shares which is authorized and issued pursuant to
Article III of the Articles of Incorporation, to accumulate
his votes by giving one candidate as many votes as the number of
directors to be elected at that time multiplied by the number of
his votes shall produce or by distributing such votes on the
same principle among any number of such candidates.
e. Shares standing in the name of another corporation,
domestic or foreign, may be voted by the officer, agent or proxy
designated by the By-laws of the corporate shareholder or, in
the absence of any applicable by-law, by such person as the
board of directors of the corporate shareholder may designate.
Proof of such designation may be made by presentation of a
certified copy of the By-laws or other instrument of the
corporate shareholder. In the absence of any such designation or
in case of conflicting designation by the corporate shareholder,
the chairman of the board, president, any vice president,
secretary and treasurer of the corporate shareholder shall be
presumed to possess, in that order, authority to vote such
shares.
Section 9. Proxies.
a. Every shareholder entitled to vote at a meeting of
shareholders or to express consent or dissent without a meeting
or a shareholders duly authorized attorney-in-fact may
authorize another person or persons to act for him by proxy.
b. Every proxy must be signed by the shareholder or his
attorney-in-fact. No proxy shall be valid after the expiration
of eleven months from the date thereof unless otherwise provided
in the proxy. Every proxy shall be revocable at the pleasure of
the shareholder executing it, except as otherwise required by
applicable law.
Section 10. Action
by Shareholders Without a Meeting.
a. Any action required by law, these By-Laws or the
Articles of Incorporation of this Corporation to be taken at any
annual or special meeting of shareholders of the Corporation or
any action which may be taken at
Annex E-2
any annual or special meeting of such shareholders may be taken
without a meeting, without prior notice and without a vote if a
consent in writing, setting forth the action so taken, shall be
signed by the holders of outstanding stock having not less than
the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize
or take such action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to
vote thereon were present and voted. If any class or series of
shares is entitled to vote thereon as a class or series, such
written consent shall be required of the holders of a majority
of the shares of each class or series of shares entitled to vote
as a class or series thereon and of the total shares entitled to
vote thereon.
b. Within ten days after obtaining such authorization by
written consent, notice shall be given to those shareholders who
have not consented in writing. The notice shall fairly summarize
the material features of the authorized action and, if the
action be a merger, consolidation or sale or exchange of assets
for which dissenters rights are provided under applicable law,
the notice shall contain a clear statement of the right of
shareholders dissenting therefrom to be paid the fair value of
their shares upon compliance with further provisions of
applicable law regarding the rights of dissenting shareholders.
Section 11. New
Business.
a. To be properly brought before any annual meeting of the
shareholders, business must be (i) specified in the notice
of meeting (or any supplement thereto) given by or at the
direction of the Board of Directors (or any duly authorized
committee thereof), (ii) otherwise properly brought before
the meeting by or at the direction of the Board of Directors (or
any duly authorized committee thereof) or (iii) otherwise
properly brought before the meeting by any shareholder of the
Corporation (A) who is a shareholder of record on the date
of the giving of the notice provided for in this Section 11
and on the record date for the determination of shareholders
entitled to vote at such meeting and (B) who complies with
the notice procedures set forth in this Section 11. In
addition to any other applicable requirements, including but not
limited to the requirements of
Rule 14a-8
promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act), and the rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder, for business to be properly brought before any
annual meeting of the shareholders by a shareholder pursuant to
clause (iii) of this Section 11(a), such shareholder
must have given timely notice thereof in proper written form to
the Secretary.
b. To be timely, a shareholders notice to the
Secretary pursuant to clause (iii) of Section 11(a)
must be delivered to or mailed and received at the principal
office of the Corporation, not less than 90 days nor more
than 120 days prior to the anniversary date of the
immediately preceding annual meeting of the shareholders;
provided, however, that in the event that the annual meeting of
the shareholders is called for a date that is not within
30 days before or after such anniversary date, notice by
the shareholder in order to be timely must be so received no
later than the close of business on the tenth day following the
day on which such notice of the date of the annual meeting of
the shareholders is mailed or such public disclosure of the date
of the annual meeting of the shareholders is made, whichever
first occurs.
c. To be in proper written form, a shareholders
notice to the Secretary pursuant to clause (iii) of
Section 11(a) must set forth as to each matter such
shareholder proposes to bring before the annual meeting of the
shareholders (i) a brief description of the business
desired to be brought before the annual meeting of the
shareholders and the reasons for conducting such business at the
annual meeting of the shareholders, (ii) the name and
record address of such shareholder, (iii) the class or
series and number of shares of capital stock of the Corporation
which are owned beneficially or of record by such shareholder,
together with evidence reasonably satisfactory to the Secretary
of such beneficial ownership, (iv) a description of all
arrangements or understandings between such shareholder and any
other person or persons (including their name or names) in
connection with the proposal of such business by such
shareholder and any material interest of such shareholder in
such business, (v) a representation that such shareholder
intends to appear in person or by proxy at the annual meeting of
the shareholders to bring such business before the annual
meeting of the shareholders and (vi) any material interest
of the shareholder proposing to bring such business before such
annual meeting of the shareholders (or any other shareholders
known to be supporting such proposal) in such proposal.
d. Notwithstanding anything in these By-laws to the
contrary, no business shall be conducted at the annual meeting
of the shareholders except business brought before such meeting
in accordance with the
Annex E-3
procedures set forth in this Section 11; provided, however,
that, once business has been properly brought before such annual
meeting of the shareholders in accordance with such procedures,
nothing in this Section 11 shall be deemed to preclude
discussion by any shareholder of any such business. If the
Chairman of such meeting determines that business was not
properly brought before the annual meeting of the shareholders
in accordance with the foregoing procedures, then the Chairman
shall declare to the meeting that the business was not properly
brought before the meeting and such business shall not be
transacted.
ARTICLE II
DIRECTORS
Section 1. Function. All
corporate powers shall be exercised by or under the authority of
and the business and affairs of a corporation shall be managed
under the direction of the Board of Directors.
Section 2. Qualification.
Directors need not be residents of this State or
shareholders of this Corporation.
Section 3. Compensation. The
Board of Directors shall have authority to fix the compensation
of the directors.
Section 4. Duties
of Directors.
a. A director shall perform his duties as a director,
including his duties as a member of any committee of the Board
upon which he may serve, in good faith, in a manner he
reasonably believes to be in the best interests of the
Corporation and with such care as an ordinarily prudent person
in a like position would use under similar circumstances.
b. In performing his duties, a director shall be entitled
to rely on information, opinions, reports or statements,
including financial statements and other financial data, in each
case prepared by and presented by:
(i) one or more officers or employees of the Corporation
whom the director reasonably believes to be reliable and
competent in the matters presented;
(ii) counsel, public accountants or other persons as to
matters which the director reasonably believes to be within such
persons professional or expert competence; or
(iii) a committee of the Board upon which he does not
serve, duly designated in accordance with a provision of the
Articles of Incorporation or the By-Laws, as to matters within
its designated authority, which committee the director
reasonably believes to merit confidence.
c. A director shall not be considered to be acting in good
faith if he has knowledge concerning the matter in question that
would cause such reliance described above to be unwarranted.
d. A person who performs his duties in compliance with this
section shall have no liability by reason of being or having
been a director of the Corporation.
e. The Board of Directors shall elect a Chairman to preside
at all meetings of the Board and at all shareholder meetings and
to fix the dates of meetings of the Board. In the absence of the
President and upon the request of a majority of the Board of
Directors, the Chairman may assume the authority of the
President, as stated in these By-Laws, and transact any business
in which the President would otherwise be permitted to engage.
Section 5. Presumption
of Assent. A director of the Corporation who is
present at a meeting of its Board of Directors at which action
on any corporate matter is taken shall be presumed to have
assented to the action taken unless he votes against such action
or abstains from voting in respect thereto because of an
asserted conflict of interest.
Section 6. Number. This
Corporation shall have not less than three (3) nor more
than fifteen (15) directors as determined by the Board of
Directors. The number of directors may be increased or
decreased
Annex E-4
from time to time by amendment to these By-Laws, but no decrease
shall have the effect of shortening the terms of any incumbent
director.
Section 7. Election
and Term. Each director hereafter elected to the
Board of Directors shall hold office for a term expiring at the
Corporations next annual meeting of shareholders.
Section 8. Vacancies. Any
vacancy occurring in the Board of Directors, including any
vacancy created by reason of an increase in the number of
directors, may be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority
of the remaining directors though less than a quorum of the
Board of Directors. A director elected or appointed to fill a
vacancy caused by the resignation or removal of a director shall
hold office for the same term as that to which such
directors predecessor was elected or appointed. In the
case of a director elected or appointed to fill a vacancy
created by reason of an increase in the number of directors, the
director shall serve for a term expiring at the
Corporations next annual meeting of shareholders.
Section 9. Removal
of Directors. At a meeting of shareholders called
expressly for that purpose, any director or the entire Board of
Directors may be removed, with or without cause, by a vote of
the holders of a majority of the shares then entitled to vote at
an election of directors.
Section 10. Quorum
and Voting. A majority of the number of directors
fixed by these By-Laws shall constitute a quorum for the
transaction of business. The act of the majority of the
directors present at a meeting at which a quorum is present
shall be the act of the Board of Directors.
Section 11. Director
Conflicts of Interest.
a. No contract or other transaction between this
Corporation and one or more of its directors or any other
corporation, firm, association or entity in which one or more of
the directors are directors or officers or are financially
interested, shall be either void or voidable because of such
relationship or interest or because such director or directors
are present at the meeting of the Board of Directors or a
committee thereof which authorizes, approves or ratifies such
contract or transaction or because his or their votes are
counted for such purpose, if:
(i) The fact of such relationship or interest is disclosed
or known to the Board of Directors or committee which
authorizes, approves or ratifies the contract or transaction by
a vote or consent sufficient for the purpose without counting
the votes or consents of such interested directors; or
(ii) The fact of such relationship or interest is disclosed
or known to the shareholders entitled to vote and they
authorize, approve or ratify such contract or transaction by
vote or written consent; or
(iii) The contract or transaction is fair and reasonable as
to the Corporation at the time it is authorized by the board, a
committee or the shareholders.
b. Common or interested directors may be counted in
determining the presence of a quorum at a meeting of the Board
of Directors or a committee thereof which authorizes, approves
or ratifies such contract or transaction.
Section 12. Executive
and Other Committees.
a. The Board of Directors, by resolution adopted by a
majority of the full Board of Directors, may designate from
among its members an executive committee and one or more other
committees each of which, to the extent provided in such
resolution, shall have and may exercise all the authority of the
Board of Directors, except that no committee shall have the
authority to:
(i) approve or recommend to shareholders actions or
proposals required by law to be approved by shareholders;
(ii) designate candidates for the office of director, for
purposes of proxy solicitation or otherwise;
(iii) fill vacancies in the Board of Directors or any
committee thereof;
(iv) amend the By-Laws;
Annex E-5
(v) authorize or approve the reacquisition of shares unless
pursuant to a general formula or method specified by the Board
of Directors; or
(vi) authorize or approve the issuance or sale of or any
contract to issue or sell shares or designate the terms of a
series of a class of shares, except that the Board of Directors,
having acted regarding general authorization for the issuance or
sale of shares, the designation thereof may, pursuant to a
general formula or method specified by the Board of Directors,
by resolution or by adoption of a stock option or other plan,
authorize a committee to fix the terms of any contract for the
sale of the shares and to fix the terms upon which such shares
may be issued or sold, including without limitation the price,
the rate or manner of payment of dividends, provisions for
redemption, sinking fund, conversion, voting or preferential
rights and provisions for other features of a class of shares or
a series of a class of shares, with full power in such committee
to adopt any final resolution setting forth all the terms
thereof and to authorize the statement of the terms of a series
for filing with the Department of State.
b. The Board of Directors, by resolution adopted in
accordance with this section, may designate one or more
directors as alternate members of any such committee, who may
act in the place and stead of any absent member or members at
any meeting of such committee.
Section 13. Chairman
of the Board. The Board of Directors shall elect
a Chairman to preside at all meetings of the Board and at all
shareholder meetings and to fix the dates of meetings of the
Board. In the absence of the President and upon the request of a
majority of the Board of Directors, the Chairman may assume the
authority of the President, as stated in these By-Laws, and
transact any business in which the President would otherwise be
permitted to engage.
Section 14. Place
of Meetings. Regular and special meetings of the
Board of Directors and Executive and other committees, created
pursuant to Section 12 of Article II hereof, may be
held within or without the State of Florida.
Section 15. Time,
Notice and Call of Meetings.
a. Written notice of the time and place of regular and
special meetings of the Board of Directors shall be given to
each director by either personal delivery, telegram, telephone
or cablegram at least two days before the meeting or by notice
mailed to the director at least five days before the meeting.
b. Notice of a meeting of the Board of Directors need not
be given to any director who signs a waiver of notice either
before or after the meeting. Attendance of a director at a
meeting shall constitute a waiver of notice of such meeting and
waiver of any and all objections to the place of the meeting,
the time of the meeting or the manner in which it has been
called or convened, except when a director states, at the
beginning of the meeting, any objection to the transaction of
business because the meeting is not lawfully called or convened.
c. Neither the business to be transacted at nor the purpose
of any regular or special meeting of the Board of Directors need
be specified in the notice or waiver of notice of such meeting.
d. A majority of the directors present, whether or not a
quorum exists, may adjourn any meeting of the Board of Directors
to another time and place. Notice of any such adjourned meeting
shall be given to the directors who were not present at the time
of the adjournment and, unless the time and place of the
adjourned meeting are announced at the time of the adjournment,
to the other directors.
e. Meetings of the Board of Directors may be called by the
Chairman of the Board, by the President of the Corporation or by
any two directors.
f. Members of the Board of Directors may participate in a
meeting of such Board by means of a conference telephone or
similar communications equipment y means of which all persons
participating in the meeting can hear each other at the same
time. Participation by such means shall constitute presence in
person at a meeting.
Section 16. Action
Without a Meeting. Any action required to be
taken at a meeting of the directors of the Corporation or any
action which may be taken at a meeting of the directors or a
committee thereof, may
Annex E-6
be taken without a meeting if a consent in writing, setting
forth the action so to be taken, signed by all the directors or
all the members of the committee, as the case may be, is filed
in the minutes of the proceedings of the Board or of the
committee. Such consent shall have the same effect as a
unanimous vote.
Section 17. Resignation
of Directors. Any director may resign from the
Board of Directors upon written notice being given to the
President and Chairman of the Board. The resignation is
effective upon receipt of the written notice by the President or
the Chairman, except that resignations received after notice has
been given of a Board of Directors meeting shall not be
effective until subsequent to that meeting or sooner if approved
by the then remaining Board members.
Section 18. Expenses
and Salaries of Directors. By resolution of the
Board of Directors, the directors may be paid their expenses, if
any, of attendance at each meeting of the Board of Directors and
may be paid a fixed sum for attendance at each meeting of the
Board of Directors or a stated salary as directors. No such
payment shall preclude any director from serving the Corporation
in any other capacity and receiving compensation therefor.
Section 19. Nomination
of Directors.
a. Only persons who are nominated in accordance with the
following procedures shall be eligible for election as directors
of the Corporation, except as may be otherwise provided in the
Articles of Incorporation or as may otherwise be required by
applicable law or regulation. Nominations of persons for
election to the Board of Directors may be made at any annual
meeting of the shareholders, or at any special meeting of the
shareholders called for the purpose of electing directors,
(i) by or at the direction of the Board of Directors (or
any duly authorized committee thereof) or (ii) by any
shareholder of the Corporation (A) who is a shareholder of
record on the date of the giving of the notice provided for in
this Section 19 and on the record date for the
determination of shareholders entitled to vote at such meeting
and (B) who complies with the notice procedures set forth
in this Section 19. In addition to any other applicable
requirements, for a nomination to be made by a shareholder
pursuant to clause (ii) of this Section 19(a), such
shareholder must have given timely notice thereof in proper
written form to the Secretary.
b. To be timely, a shareholders notice to the
Secretary pursuant to clause (ii) of Section 19(a)
must be delivered to or mailed and received at the principal
office of the Corporation (i) in the case of an annual
meeting of the shareholders, not less than 90 days nor more
than 120 days prior to the anniversary date of the
immediately preceding annual meeting of the shareholders;
provided, however, that in the event that the annual meeting of
the shareholders is called for a date that is not within
30 days before or after such anniversary date, notice by
the shareholder in order to be timely must be so received not
later than the close of business on the tenth day following the
day on which such notice of the date of the annual meeting of
the shareholders is mailed or such public disclosure of the date
of the annual meeting of the shareholders is made, whichever
first occurs, or (ii) in the case of a special meeting of
the shareholders called for the purpose of electing directors,
not later than the close of business on the tenth day following
the day on which notice of the date of the special meeting of
the shareholders is mailed or public disclosure of the date of
the special meeting of the shareholders is made, whichever first
occurs.
c. To be in proper written form, a shareholders
notice to the Secretary pursuant to clause (ii) of
Section 19(a) must set forth (i) as to each person
whom the shareholder proposes to nominate for election as a
director, (A) the name, age, business address and residence
address of the person, (B) the principal occupation or
employment of the person, (C) the class or series and
number of shares of capital stock of the Corporation which are
owned beneficially or of record by the person and (D) any
other information relating to the person that would be required
to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filing required to
be made in connection with solicitations of proxies for election
of directors pursuant to Section 14 of the Exchange Act and
the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and
(ii) as to the shareholder giving the notice, (A) the
name and record address of such shareholder, (B) the class
or series and number of shares of capital stock of the
Corporation which are owned beneficially or of record by such
shareholder, together with evidence reasonably satisfactory to
the Secretary of such beneficial ownership, (C) a
description of all arrangements or understandings between such
shareholder and each proposed nominee and any other person(s)
(including their name(s)) pursuant to which the nomination(s)
are to be made by such shareholder, (D) a representation
that such
Annex E-7
shareholder intends to appear in person or by proxy at the
meeting to nominate the person(s) named in its notice and
(E) any other information relating to such shareholder that
would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other
filing required to be made in connection with solicitations of
proxies for election of directors pursuant to Section 14 of
the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder.
d. No person shall be eligible for election as a director
of the Corporation unless nominated in accordance with the
procedures set forth in this Section 19. If the Chairman of
the meeting determines that a nomination was not made in
accordance with the foregoing procedures, then the Chairman of
the meeting shall declare to the meeting that the nomination was
defective and such defective nomination shall be disregarded.
ARTICLE III
OFFICERS
Section 1. Officers. The
officers of this Corporation shall consist of a President, Vice
President, a Secretary and a Treasurer, each of whom shall be
elected by the Board of Directors. Such other officers and
assistant officers and agents as may be deemed necessary may be
elected or appointed by the Board of Directors from time to
time. Any two or more offices may be held by the same person.
The failure to elect any of the aforesaid officers shall not
effect the existence of this Corporation.
Section 2. Duties. The
officers of this Corporation shall have the following duties:
a. The President shall be the chief executive officer of
the Corporation, shall have general and active management of the
business and affairs of the Corporation subject to the
directions of the Board of Directors and shall preside at all
meetings of the stockholders and Board of Directors.
b. The Vice President shall have duties and powers incident
to the specific area of employment and shall have such other
powers and duties as may be prescribed by the President or Board
of Directors. In the event of incapacity of the President, the
Vice President may be designated by the Board of Directors to
perform such duties of the President as the Board shall
prescribe.
c. The Secretary shall have custody of and maintain all of
the corporate records, except the financial records, shall
record the minutes of all meetings of the stockholders and Board
of Directors, shall send all notices of meetings out and shall
perform such other duties as may be prescribed by the Board of
Directors or the President.
d. The Treasurer shall have custody of all corporate funds
and financial records, shall keep full and accurate accounts of
receipts and disbursements and render accounts thereof at the
annual meetings of stockholders and whenever else required by
the Board of Directors or the President and shall perform such
other duties as may be prescribed by the Board of Directors or
the President.
Section 3. Delegation
of Duties. In the case of the absence of an
officer of the Corporation or for any other reason that the
Board may deem sufficient, the Board may delegate for the time
being the powers and duties of such officers to any other
officer or officers or to any director or directors or to any
other individual or individuals.
Section 4. Removal
of Officers.
a. Any officer or agent elected or appointed by the Board
of Directors may be removed by the Board whenever in its
judgment the best interests of the Corporation will be served
thereby.
b. Any officer or agent elected by the shareholders may be
removed only by vote of the directors to remove such officer or
agent.
c. Any vacancy, however occurring, in any office may be
filled by the Board of Directors.
d. Removal, as provided in this section, shall be without
prejudice to the contract rights, if any, of the person so
removed. Election or appointment of an officer or agent shall
not, in and of itself, create contract rights.
Annex E-8
Section 5. Salary
of Officers. The salaries of the officers shall
be fixed from time to time by the Board of Directors or the
executive committee. No officer shall be prevented from
receiving such salary by reason of the fact that he is also a
director of the Corporation.
ARTICLE IV
STOCK
CERTIFICATES
Section 1. Issuance. Shares
of capital stock of the Corporation may, but need not, be
represented by certificates. No certificate shall be issued for
any share until such share is fully paid.
Section 2. Form.
a. Certificates representing shares in this Corporation
shall be signed by the President or Vice President and Secretary
or an Assistant Secretary and may be sealed with the seal of
this Corporation or a facsimile thereof. The signatures of the
President or Vice President and Secretary or Assistant Secretary
may be facsimiles if the certificate is manually signed on
behalf of a transfer agent or a registrar, other than the
Corporation itself or an employee of the Corporation. In case
any officer who signed or whose facsimile signature has been
placed upon such certificate shall have ceased to be such
officer before such certificate is issued, it may be issued by
the Corporation with the same effect as if he were such officer
at the date of its issuance.
b. Every certificate representing shares issued by this
Corporation shall set forth or fairly summarize upon the face or
back of the certificate or shall state that the Corporation will
furnish to any shareholder, upon request and without charge, a
full statement of the designations, preferences, limitations and
relative rights of the shares of each class or series authorized
to be issued and the variations in the relative rights and
preferences between the shares of each series so far as the same
have been fixed and determined and the authority of the Board of
Directors to fix and determine the relative rights and
preferences of subsequent series.
c. Every certificate representing shares which are
restricted as to the sale, disposition or other transfer of such
shares shall state that such shares are restricted as to
transfer and shall set forth or fairly summarize upon the
certificate or shall state that the Corporation will furnish to
any shareholder, upon request and without charge, a full
statement of such restrictions.
d. Each certificate representing shares shall state upon
the face thereof: the name of the Corporation; that the
Corporation is organized under the laws of this State; the name
of the person or persons to whom issued; the number and class of
shares and the designation of the series, if any, which such
certificate represents; and the par value of each share
represented by such certificate or a statement that the shares
are without par value.
Section 3. Lost,
Stolen or Destroyed Certificates. The Corporation
may, but need not, issue a new stock certificate in the place of
any certificate previously issued if the holder of record of the
certificate
a. Makes proof in affidavit form that it has been lost,
destroyed or wrongfully taken;
b. Requests the issue of a new certificate before the
Corporation has notice that the certificate has been acquired by
a purchaser for value in good faith and without notice of any
adverse claim;
c. Gives bond in such form as the Corporation may direct to
indemnify the Corporation, the transfer agent and registrar
against any claim that may be made on account of the alleged
loss, destruction or theft of a certificate; and
d. Satisfies any other reasonable requirements imposed by
the Corporation.
In the event the holder of record of the lost, stolen or
destroyed certificate complies with subsections (a)
(d) of this section and the Corporation does not issue a
new certificate in the place of such lost, stolen or destroyed
certificate because the Board of Directors has authorized the
class or series of capital stock of the Corporation to which the
shares represented by the lost, stolen or destroyed certificate
belong be uncertificated, then the Corporation shall send the
person otherwise entitled thereto the written statement required
by Section 4 of this Article IV.
Annex E-9
Section 4. Shares
of Stock Without Certificates. The Board of
Directors may authorize the issuance of some or all of the
shares of any or all of the classes or series of capital stock
of the Corporation without certificates. The authorization shall
not affect shares of stock already represented by certificates
until and unless said certificates are surrendered to the
Corporation or its transfer agent. Within a reasonable time
after the issuance or transfer of shares without certificates,
the Corporation shall send the holder thereof a written
statement of the information required on certificates of stock
by applicable law or these Bylaws.
ARTICLE V
BOOKS AND RECORDS
Section 1. Books
and Records.
a. The Corporation shall keep correct and complete books
and records of account and shall keep minutes of the proceedings
of its shareholders, Board of Directors and committees of
directors.
b. This Corporation shall keep at its registered office or
principal place of business or at the office of its transfer
agent or registrar a record of its shareholders, giving the
names and addresses of all shareholders and the number, class
and series, if any, of the shares held by each.
c. Any books, records and minutes may be in written form or
in any other form capable of being converted into written form
within a reasonable time.
Section 2. Shareholders
Inspection Rights. Any person who shall have
been a holder of record of shares or of voting certificates
there for at least six months immediately preceding his demand
or shall be the holder of record of or the holder of record of
voting trust certificates for at least five percent of the
outstanding shares of any class or series of the Corporation,
upon written demand stating the purpose thereof, shall have the
right to examine, in person or by agent or attorney, at any
reasonable time or times, for any proper purpose, its relevant
books and records of accounts, minutes and records of
shareholders and to make extracts therefrom.
Section 3. Financial
Information.
a. Unless modified by a resolution of the stockholders not
later than four months after the close of each fiscal year, this
Corporation shall prepare a balance sheet showing in reasonable
detail the financial condition of the Corporation as of the
close of its fiscal year and a profit and loss statement showing
the results of the operations of the Corporation during its
fiscal year.
b. Upon the written request of any shareholder or holder of
voting trust certificates for shares of the Corporation, the
Corporation shall mail to such shareholder or holder of voting
trust certificates a copy of the most recent such balance sheet
and profit and loss statement.
c. The balance sheet and profit and loss statements shall
be filed in the registered office of the Corporation in this
State, shall be kept for at least five years and shall be
subject to inspection during business hours by any shareholder
or holder of voting trust certificates, in person or by agent.
ARTICLE VI
DIVIDENDS
The Board of Directors of this Corporation may, from time to
time, declare and the Corporation may pay dividends on its
shares in cash, property or its own shares, except when the
Corporation is insolvent or when the payment thereof would
render the Corporation insolvent or when the declaration or
payment thereof would be contrary to any restrictions contained
in the Articles of Incorporation, subject to the following
provisions:
a. Dividends in cash or property may be declared and paid,
except as otherwise provided in this section, only out of the
unreserved and unrestricted earned surplus of the Corporation or
out of capital surplus, howsoever arising, but each dividend
paid out of capital surplus shall be identified as a
Annex E-10
distribution of capital surplus and the amount per share paid
from such surplus shall be disclosed to the shareholders
receiving the same concurrently with the distribution.
b. Dividends may be declared and paid in the
Corporations own treasury shares.
c. Dividends may be declared and paid in the
Corporations own authorized but unissued shares out of any
unreserved and unrestricted surplus of the Corporation upon the
following conditions:
(i) If a dividend is payable in shares having a par value,
such shares shall be issued at not less than the par value
thereof and there shall be transferred to stated capital at the
time such dividend is paid an amount of surplus equal to the
aggregate par value of the shares to be issued as a dividend.
(ii) If a dividend is payable in shares without par value,
such shares shall be issued at such stated value as shall be
fixed by the Board of Directors by resolution adopted at the
time such dividend is declared and there shall be transferred to
stated capital at the time such dividend is paid an amount of
surplus equal to the aggregate stated value so fixed in respect
of such shares and the amount per share so transferred to stated
capital shall be disclosed to the shareholders receiving such
dividend concurrently with the payment thereof.
d. No dividend payable in shares of any class shall be paid
to the holders of shares of any other class unless the Articles
of Incorporation so provide or such payment is authorized by the
affirmative vote or the written consent of the holders of at
least a majority of the outstanding shares of the class in which
the payment is to be made.
e. A
split-up or
division of the issued shares of any class into a greater number
of shares of the same class without increasing the stated
capital of the Corporation shall not be construed to be a share
dividend within the meaning of this section.
f. Dividends shall be payable only with respect to such
series of Common Shares
and/or
Preferred Shares and subject to such restrictions as the Board
of Directors shall so designate pursuant to Article VI of
the Articles of Incorporation.
ARTICLE VII
AMENDMENT
The By-laws may be amended by a majority vote of either the
Board of Directors or the shareholders eligible to vote;
provided, however, that the Board of Directors may not amend or
repeal any by-law adopted by shareholders if the shareholders
specifically provide that such by-law is not subject to
amendment or repeal by the board of directors.
ARTICLE VIII
INDEMNIFICATION
This Corporation shall indemnify any and all of its directors,
officers, employees or agents or former directors, officers,
employees or agents or any person or persons who may have served
at its request as a director, officer, employee or agent of
another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other
enterprise in which it owns shares of capital stock or of which
it is a creditor to the full extent permitted by law. Said
indemnification shall include but not be limited to the
expenses, including the cost of any judgments, fines,
settlements and counsel fees, actually paid or incurred in
connection with any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil,
criminal, administrative or investigative, and any appeals
thereof, to which any such person or his legal representative
may be made a party or may be threatened to be made a party by
reason of his being or having been a director, officer, employee
or agent as herein provided. The foregoing right of
indemnification shall not be exclusive of any other rights to
which any director, officer, employee or agent may be entitled
as a matter of law.
Annex E-11
Annex F
SECTIONS 607.1301
TO 607.1333 OF THE FLORIDA BUSINESS CORPORATION ACT
607.1301.
Appraisal rights; definitions
The following definitions apply to ss. 607.1302 - 607.1333:
(1) Affiliate means a person that
directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries
controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with
another person or is a senior executive thereof. For purposes of
s. 607.1302(2)(d), a person is deemed to be an affiliate of its
senior executives.
(2) Beneficial shareholder means a
person who is the beneficial owner of shares held in a voting
trust or by a nominee on the beneficial owners behalf.
(3) Corporation means the issuer of the
shares held by a shareholder demanding appraisal and, for
matters covered in ss. 607.1322 - 607.1333, includes the
surviving entity in a merger.
(4) Fair value means the value of the
corporations shares determined:
(a) Immediately before the effectuation of the corporate
action to which the shareholder objects.
(b) Using customary and current valuation concepts and
techniques generally employed for similar businesses in the
context of the transaction requiring appraisal, excluding any
appreciation or depreciation in anticipation of the corporate
action unless exclusion would be inequitable to the corporation
and its remaining shareholders.
(c) For a corporation with 10 or fewer shareholders,
without discounting for lack of marketability or minority status.
(5) Interest means interest from the
effective date of the corporate action until the date of
payment, at the rate of interest on judgments in this state on
the effective date of the corporate action.
(6) Preferred shares means a class or
series of shares the holders of which have preference over any
other class or series with respect to distributions.
(7) Record shareholder means the person
in whose name shares are registered in the records of the
corporation or the beneficial owner of shares to the extent of
the rights granted by a nominee certificate on file with the
corporation.
(8) Senior executive means the chief
executive officer, chief operating officer, chief financial
officer, or anyone in charge of a principal business unit or
function.
(9) Shareholder means both a record
shareholder and a beneficial shareholder.
607.1302.
Right of shareholders to appraisal
(1) A shareholder of a domestic corporation is entitled to
appraisal rights, and to obtain payment of the fair value of
that shareholders shares, in the event of any of the
following corporate actions:
(a) Consummation of a conversion of such corporation
pursuant to s. 607.1112 if shareholder approval is required for
the conversion and the shareholder is entitled to vote on the
conversion under ss. 607.1103 and 607.1112(6), or the
consummation of a merger to which such corporation is a party if
shareholder approval is required for the merger under s.
607.1103 and the shareholder is entitled to vote on the merger
or if such corporation is a subsidiary and the merger is
governed by s. 607.1104;
(b) Consummation of a share exchange to which the
corporation is a party as the corporation whose shares will be
acquired if the shareholder is entitled to vote on the exchange,
except that appraisal rights shall not be available to any
shareholder of the corporation with respect to any class or
series of shares of the corporation that is not exchanged;
Annex F-1
(c) Consummation of a disposition of assets pursuant to s.
607.1202 if the shareholder is entitled to vote on the
disposition, including a sale in dissolution but not including a
sale pursuant to court order or a sale for cash pursuant to a
plan by which all or substantially all of the net proceeds of
the sale will be distributed to the shareholders within
1 year after the date of sale;
(d) An amendment of the articles of incorporation with
respect to the class or series of shares which reduces the
number of shares of a class or series owned by the shareholder
to a fraction of a share if the corporation has the obligation
or right to repurchase the fractional share so created;
(e) Any other amendment to the articles of incorporation,
merger, share exchange, or disposition of assets to the extent
provided by the articles of incorporation, bylaws, or a
resolution of the board of directors, except that no bylaw or
board resolution providing for appraisal rights may be amended
or otherwise altered except by shareholder approval; or
(f) With regard to a class of shares prescribed in the
articles of incorporation prior to October 1, 2003,
including any shares within that class subsequently authorized
by amendment, any amendment of the articles of incorporation if
the shareholder is entitled to vote on the amendment and if such
amendment would adversely affect such shareholder by:
1. Altering or abolishing any preemptive rights attached to
any of his or her shares;
2. Altering or abolishing the voting rights pertaining to
any of his or her shares, except as such rights may be affected
by the voting rights of new shares then being authorized of any
existing or new class or series of shares;
3. Effecting an exchange, cancellation, or reclassification
of any of his or her shares, when such exchange, cancellation,
or reclassification would alter or abolish the
shareholders voting rights or alter his or her percentage
of equity in the corporation, or effecting a reduction or
cancellation of accrued dividends or other arrearages in respect
to such shares;
4. Reducing the stated redemption price of any of the
shareholders redeemable shares, altering or abolishing any
provision relating to any sinking fund for the redemption or
purchase of any of his or her shares, or making any of his or
her shares subject to redemption when they are not otherwise
redeemable;
5. Making noncumulative, in whole or in part, dividends of
any of the shareholders preferred shares which had
theretofore been cumulative;
6. Reducing the stated dividend preference of any of the
shareholders preferred shares; or
7. Reducing any stated preferential amount payable on any
of the shareholders preferred shares upon voluntary or
involuntary liquidation.
(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), the availability of
appraisal rights under paragraphs (1)(a), (b), (c), and
(d) shall be limited in accordance with the following
provisions:
(a) Appraisal rights shall not be available for the holders
of shares of any class or series of shares which is:
1. Listed on the New York Stock Exchange or the American
Stock Exchange or designated as a national market system
security on an interdealer quotation system by the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.; or
2. Not so listed or designated, but has at least
2,000 shareholders and the outstanding shares of such class
or series have a market value of at least $10 million,
exclusive of the value of such shares held by its subsidiaries,
senior executives, directors, and beneficial shareholders owning
more than 10 percent of such shares.
Annex F-2
(b) The applicability of paragraph (a) shall be
determined as of:
1. The record date fixed to determine the shareholders
entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at, the meeting of
shareholders to act upon the corporate action requiring
appraisal rights; or
2. If there will be no meeting of shareholders, the close
of business on the day on which the board of directors adopts
the resolution recommending such corporate action.
(c) Paragraph (a) shall not be applicable and
appraisal rights shall be available pursuant to
subsection (1) for the holders of any class or series of
shares who are required by the terms of the corporate action
requiring appraisal rights to accept for such shares anything
other than cash or shares of any class or any series of shares
of any corporation, or any other proprietary interest of any
other entity, that satisfies the standards set forth in
paragraph (a) at the time the corporate action becomes
effective.
(d) Paragraph (a) shall not be applicable and
appraisal rights shall be available pursuant to
subsection (1) for the holders of any class or series of
shares if:
1. Any of the shares or assets of the corporation are being
acquired or converted, whether by merger, share exchange, or
otherwise, pursuant to the corporate action by a person, or by
an affiliate of a person, who:
a. Is, or at any time in the
1-year
period immediately preceding approval by the board of directors
of the corporate action requiring appraisal rights was, the
beneficial owner of 20 percent or more of the voting power
of the corporation, excluding any shares acquired pursuant to an
offer for all shares having voting power if such offer was made
within 1 year prior to the corporate action requiring
appraisal rights for consideration of the same kind and of a
value equal to or less than that paid in connection with the
corporate action; or
b. Directly or indirectly has, or at any time in the
1-year
period immediately preceding approval by the board of directors
of the corporation of the corporate action requiring appraisal
rights had, the power, contractually or otherwise, to cause the
appointment or election of 25 percent or more of the
directors to the board of directors of the corporation; or
2. Any of the shares or assets of the corporation are being
acquired or converted, whether by merger, share exchange, or
otherwise, pursuant to such corporate action by a person, or by
an affiliate of a person, who is, or at any time in the
1-year
period immediately preceding approval by the board of directors
of the corporate action requiring appraisal rights was, a senior
executive or director of the corporation or a senior executive
of any affiliate thereof, and that senior executive or director
will receive, as a result of the corporate action, a financial
benefit not generally available to other shareholders as such,
other than:
a. Employment, consulting, retirement, or similar benefits
established separately and not as part of or in contemplation of
the corporate action;
b. Employment, consulting, retirement, or similar benefits
established in contemplation of, or as part of, the corporate
action that are not more favorable than those existing before
the corporate action or, if more favorable, that have been
approved on behalf of the corporation in the same manner as is
provided in s. 607.0832; or
c. In the case of a director of the corporation who will,
in the corporate action, become a director of the acquiring
entity in the corporate action or one of its affiliates, rights
and benefits as a director that are provided on the same basis
as those afforded by the acquiring entity generally to other
directors of such entity or such affiliate.
(e) For the purposes of paragraph (d) only, the term
beneficial owner means any person who, directly or
indirectly, through any contract, arrangement, or understanding,
other than a revocable proxy, has or shares the power to vote,
or to direct the voting of, shares, provided that a member of a
national securities exchange shall not be deemed to be a
beneficial owner of securities held directly or indirectly by it
on behalf of another person solely because such member is the
recordholder of such securities if the
Annex F-3
member is precluded by the rules of such exchange from voting
without instruction on contested matters or matters that may
affect substantially the rights or privileges of the holders of
the securities to be voted. When two or more persons agree to
act together for the purpose of voting their shares of the
corporation, each member of the group formed thereby shall be
deemed to have acquired beneficial ownership, as of the date of
such agreement, of all voting shares of the corporation
beneficially owned by any member of the group.
(3) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section,
the articles of incorporation as originally filed or any
amendment thereto may limit or eliminate appraisal rights for
any class or series of preferred shares, but any such limitation
or elimination contained in an amendment to the articles of
incorporation that limits or eliminates appraisal rights for any
of such shares that are outstanding immediately prior to the
effective date of such amendment or that the corporation is or
may be required to issue or sell thereafter pursuant to any
conversion, exchange, or other right existing immediately before
the effective date of such amendment shall not apply to any
corporate action that becomes effective within 1 year of
that date if such action would otherwise afford appraisal rights.
(4) A shareholder entitled to appraisal rights under this
chapter may not challenge a completed corporate action for which
appraisal rights are available unless such corporate action:
(a) Was not effectuated in accordance with the applicable
provisions of this section or the corporations articles of
incorporation, bylaws, or board of directors resolution
authorizing the corporate action; or
(b) Was procured as a result of fraud or material
misrepresentation.
607.1303.
Assertion of rights by nominees and beneficial owners
(1) A record shareholder may assert appraisal rights as to
fewer than all the shares registered in the record
shareholders name but owned by a beneficial shareholder
only if the record shareholder objects with respect to all
shares of the class or series owned by the beneficial
shareholder and notifies the corporation in writing of the name
and address of each beneficial shareholder on whose behalf
appraisal rights are being asserted. The rights of a record
shareholder who asserts appraisal rights for only part of the
shares held of record in the record shareholders name
under this subsection shall be determined as if the shares as to
which the record shareholder objects and the record
shareholders other shares were registered in the names of
different record shareholders.
(2) A beneficial shareholder may assert appraisal rights as
to shares of any class or series held on behalf of the
shareholder only if such shareholder:
(a) Submits to the corporation the record
shareholders written consent to the assertion of such
rights no later than the date referred to in s. 607.1322(2)(b)2.
(b) Does so with respect to all shares of the class or
series that are beneficially owned by the beneficial shareholder.
607.1320.
Notice of appraisal rights
(1) If proposed corporate action described in s.
607.1302(1) is to be submitted to a vote at a shareholders
meeting, the meeting notice must state that the corporation has
concluded that shareholders are, are not, or may be entitled to
assert appraisal rights under this chapter. If the corporation
concludes that appraisal rights are or may be available, a copy
of ss. 607.1301 607.1333 must accompany the meeting
notice sent to those record shareholders entitled to exercise
appraisal rights.
(2) In a merger pursuant to s. 607.1104, the parent
corporation must notify in writing all record shareholders of
the subsidiary who are entitled to assert appraisal rights that
the corporate action became effective. Such notice must be sent
within 10 days after the corporate action became effective
and include the materials described in s. 607.1322.
Annex F-4
(3) If the proposed corporate action described in s.
607.1302(1) is to be approved other than by a shareholders
meeting, the notice referred to in subsection (1) must be
sent to all shareholders at the time that consents are first
solicited pursuant to s. 607.0704, whether or not consents are
solicited from all shareholders, and include the materials
described in s. 607.1322.
607.1321.
Notice of intent to demand payment
(1) If proposed corporate action requiring appraisal rights
under s. 607.1302 is submitted to a vote at a shareholders
meeting, or is submitted to a shareholder pursuant to a consent
vote under s. 607.0704, a shareholder who wishes to assert
appraisal rights with respect to any class or series of shares:
(a) Must deliver to the corporation before the vote is
taken, or within 20 days after receiving the notice
pursuant to s. 607.1320(3) if action is to be taken without a
shareholder meeting, written notice of the shareholders
intent to demand payment if the proposed action is effectuated.
(b) Must not vote, or cause or permit to be voted, any
shares of such class or series in favor of the proposed action.
(2) A shareholder who does not satisfy the requirements of
subsection (1) is not entitled to payment under this
chapter.
607.1322.
Appraisal notice and form
(1) If proposed corporate action requiring appraisal rights
under s. 607.1302(1) becomes effective, the corporation must
deliver a written appraisal notice and form required by
paragraph (2)(a) to all shareholders who satisfied the
requirements of s. 607.1321. In the case of a merger under s.
607.1104, the parent must deliver a written appraisal notice and
form to all record shareholders who may be entitled to assert
appraisal rights.
(2) The appraisal notice must be sent no earlier than the
date the corporate action became effective and no later than
10 days after such date and must:
(a) Supply a form that specifies the date that the
corporate action became effective and that provides for the
shareholder to state:
1. The shareholders name and address.
2. The number, classes, and series of shares as to which
the shareholder asserts appraisal rights.
3. That the shareholder did not vote for the transaction.
4. Whether the shareholder accepts the corporations
offer as stated in subparagraph (b)4.
5. If the offer is not accepted, the shareholders
estimated fair value of the shares and a demand for payment of
the shareholders estimated value plus interest.
(b) State:
1. Where the form must be sent and where certificates for
certificated shares must be deposited and the date by which
those certificates must be deposited, which date may not be
earlier than the date for receiving the required form under
subparagraph 2.
2. A date by which the corporation must receive the form,
which date may not be fewer than 40 nor more than 60 days
after the date the subsection (1) appraisal notice and form
are sent, and state that the shareholder shall have waived the
right to demand appraisal with respect to the shares unless the
form is received by the corporation by such specified date.
3. The corporations estimate of the fair value of the
shares.
4. An offer to each shareholder who is entitled to
appraisal rights to pay the corporations estimate of fair
value set forth in subparagraph 3.
Annex F-5
5. That, if requested in writing, the corporation will
provide to the shareholder so requesting, within 10 days
after the date specified in subparagraph 2., the number of
shareholders who return the forms by the specified date and the
total number of shares owned by them.
6. The date by which the notice to withdraw under s.
607.1323 must be received, which date must be within
20 days after the date specified in subparagraph 2.
(c) Be accompanied by:
1. Financial statements of the corporation that issued the
shares to be appraised, consisting of a balance sheet as of the
end of the fiscal year ending not more than 15 months prior
to the date of the corporations appraisal notice, an
income statement for that year, a cash flow statement for that
year, and the latest available interim financial statements, if
any.
2. A copy of ss. 607.1301 607.1333.
607.1323.
Perfection of rights; right to withdraw
(1) A shareholder who wishes to exercise appraisal rights
must execute and return the form received pursuant to s.
607.1322(1) and, in the case of certificated shares, deposit the
shareholders certificates in accordance with the terms of
the notice by the date referred to in the notice pursuant to s.
607.1322(2)(b)2. Once a shareholder deposits that
shareholders certificates or, in the case of
uncertificated shares, returns the executed forms, that
shareholder loses all rights as a shareholder, unless the
shareholder withdraws pursuant to subsection (2).
(2) A shareholder who has complied with subsection (1)
may nevertheless decline to exercise appraisal rights and
withdraw from the appraisal process by so notifying the
corporation in writing by the date set forth in the appraisal
notice pursuant to s. 607.1322(2)(b)6. A shareholder who fails
to so withdraw from the appraisal process may not thereafter
withdraw without the corporations written consent.
(3) A shareholder who does not execute and return the form
and, in the case of certificated shares, deposit that
shareholders share certificates if required, each by the
date set forth in the notice described in subsection (2), shall
not be entitled to payment under this chapter.
607.1324.
Shareholders acceptance of corporations
offer
(1) If the shareholder states on the form provided in s.
607.1322(1) that the shareholder accepts the offer of the
corporation to pay the corporations estimated fair value
for the shares, the corporation shall make such payment to the
shareholder within 90 days after the corporations
receipt of the form from the shareholder.
(2) Upon payment of the agreed value, the shareholder shall
cease to have any interest in the shares.
607.1326.
Procedure if shareholder is dissatisfied with offer
(1) A shareholder who is dissatisfied with the
corporations offer as set forth pursuant to s.
607.1322(2)(b)4 must notify the corporation on the form provided
pursuant to s. 607.1322(1) of that shareholders estimate
of the fair value of the shares and demand payment of that
estimate plus interest.
(2) A shareholder who fails to notify the corporation in
writing of that shareholders demand to be paid the
shareholders stated estimate of the fair value plus
interest under subsection (1) within the timeframe set
forth in s. 607.1322(2)(b)2 waives the right to demand payment
under this section and shall be entitled only to the payment
offered by the corporation pursuant to s. 607.1322(2)(b)4.
607.1330.
Court action
(1) If a shareholder makes demand for payment under s.
607.1326 which remains unsettled, the corporation shall commence
a proceeding within 60 days after receiving the payment
demand and petition the court to determine the fair value of the
shares and accrued interest. If the corporation does not
commence the
Annex F-6
proceeding within the
60-day
period, any shareholder who has made a demand pursuant to s.
607.1326 may commence the proceeding in the name of the
corporation.
(2) The proceeding shall be commenced in the appropriate
court of the county in which the corporations principal
office, or, if none, its registered office, in this state is
located. If the corporation is a foreign corporation without a
registered office in this state, the proceeding shall be
commenced in the county in this state in which the principal
office or registered office of the domestic corporation merged
with the foreign corporation was located at the time of the
transaction.
(3) All shareholders, whether or not residents of this
state, whose demands remain unsettled shall be made parties to
the proceeding as in an action against their shares. The
corporation shall serve a copy of the initial pleading in such
proceeding upon each shareholder party who is a resident of this
state in the manner provided by law for the service of a summons
and complaint and upon each nonresident shareholder party by
registered or certified mail or by publication as provided by
law.
(4) The jurisdiction of the court in which the proceeding
is commenced under subsection (2) is plenary and exclusive.
If it so elects, the court may appoint one or more persons as
appraisers to receive evidence and recommend a decision on the
question of fair value. The appraisers shall have the powers
described in the order appointing them or in any amendment to
the order. The shareholders demanding appraisal rights are
entitled to the same discovery rights as parties in other civil
proceedings. There shall be no right to a jury trial.
(5) Each shareholder made a party to the proceeding is
entitled to judgment for the amount of the fair value of such
shareholders shares, plus interest, as found by the court.
(6) The corporation shall pay each such shareholder the
amount found to be due within 10 days after final
determination of the proceedings. Upon payment of the judgment,
the shareholder shall cease to have any interest in the shares.
607.1331.
Court costs and counsel fees
(1) The court in an appraisal proceeding shall determine
all costs of the proceeding, including the reasonable
compensation and expenses of appraisers appointed by the court.
The court shall assess the costs against the corporation, except
that the court may assess costs against all or some of the
shareholders demanding appraisal, in amounts the court finds
equitable, to the extent the court finds such shareholders acted
arbitrarily, vexatiously, or not in good faith with respect to
the rights provided by this chapter.
(2) The court in an appraisal proceeding may also assess
the fees and expenses of counsel and experts for the respective
parties, in amounts the court finds equitable:
(a) Against the corporation and in favor of any or all
shareholders demanding appraisal if the court finds the
corporation did not substantially comply with ss. 607.1320 and
607.1322; or
(b) Against either the corporation or a shareholder
demanding appraisal, in favor of any other party, if the court
finds that the party against whom the fees and expenses are
assessed acted arbitrarily, vexatiously, or not in good faith
with respect to the rights provided by this chapter.
(3) If the court in an appraisal proceeding finds that the
services of counsel for any shareholder were of substantial
benefit to other shareholders similarly situated, and that the
fees for those services should not be assessed against the
corporation, the court may award to such counsel reasonable fees
to be paid out of the amounts awarded the shareholders who were
benefited.
(4) To the extent the corporation fails to make a required
payment pursuant to s. 607.1324, the shareholder may sue
directly for the amount owed and, to the extent successful,
shall be entitled to recover from the corporation all costs and
expenses of the suit, including counsel fees.
Annex F-7
607.1332.
Disposition of acquired shares
Shares acquired by a corporation pursuant to payment of the
agreed value thereof or pursuant to payment of the judgment
entered therefor, as provided in this chapter, may be held and
disposed of by such corporation as authorized but unissued
shares of the corporation, except that, in the case of a merger
or share exchange, they may be held and disposed of as the plan
of merger or share exchange otherwise provides. The shares of
the surviving corporation into which the shares of such
shareholders demanding appraisal rights would have been
converted had they assented to the merger shall have the status
of authorized but unissued shares of the surviving corporation.
607.1333.
Limitation on corporate payment
(1) No payment shall be made to a shareholder seeking
appraisal rights if, at the time of payment, the corporation is
unable to meet the distribution standards of s. 607.06401. In
such event, the shareholder shall, at the shareholders
option:
(a) Withdraw his or her notice of intent to assert
appraisal rights, which shall in such event be deemed withdrawn
with the consent of the corporation; or
(b) Retain his or her status as a claimant against the
corporation and, if it is liquidated, be subordinated to the
rights of creditors of the corporation, but have rights superior
to the shareholders not asserting appraisal rights, and if it is
not liquidated, retain his or her right to be paid for the
shares, which right the corporation shall be obliged to satisfy
when the restrictions of this section do not apply.
(2) The shareholder shall exercise the option under
paragraph (1)(a) or paragraph (b) by written notice filed
with the corporation within 30 days after the corporation
has given written notice that the payment for shares cannot be
made because of the restrictions of this section. If the
shareholder fails to exercise the option, the shareholder shall
be deemed to have withdrawn his or her notice of intent to
assert appraisal rights.
Annex F-8
Form of Proxy
Class A Common Stock
WOODBRIDGE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
2100 WEST CYPRESS CREEK ROAD
FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33309
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF
WOODBRIDGE HOLDINGS CORPORATION
SEPTEMBER 21, 2009
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The undersigned hereby appoints Seth Wise and Amerisa Kornblum, and each of them acting alone, with
the power to appoint his or her substitute, proxy to represent the undersigned and vote as
designated on the reverse all of the shares of Class A Common Stock of Woodbridge Holdings
Corporation held of record by the undersigned on August 18, 2009 at the Annual Meeting of
Shareholders to be held on September 21, 2009 and at any adjournment or postponement thereof.
(continued and to be signed on the reverse side)
PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE x
1. The approval of the Agreement and
Plan of Merger, dated as of July 2,
2009, by and among Woodbridge Holdings
Corporation, BFC Financial Corporation
and WDG Merger Sub, LLC, pursuant to
which Woodbridge will merge with and
into a wholly owned subsidiary of BFC
and each outstanding share of
Woodbridges Class A Common Stock
(other than shares owned by BFC) will
be converted into the right to receive
3.47 shares of BFCs Class A Common
Stock.
2. The election of three directors,
each for a term expiring at the earlier
of the consummation of the merger
described in Proposal 1 and 2012.
Nominees:
Alan B. Levan
James Blosser
Darwin Dornbush
|
|
|
o |
|
WITHHOLD AUTHORITY
FOR ALL NOMINEES |
|
|
|
o |
|
FOR ALL EXCEPT
(See instructions below) |
INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to
vote for any individual nominee(s),
mark FOR ALL EXCEPT and write the
nominees name(s) below.
3. In his or her discretion, the proxy is authorized to vote upon such other
matters as may properly come before the meeting.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR PROPOSAL 1 AND FOR EACH OF THE DIRECTORS NAMED IN PROPOSAL 2.
THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED SHAREHOLDER. IF NO DIRECTION IS
MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR PROPOSAL 1 AND FOR THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE DIRECTORS NAMED IN PROPOSAL 2.
PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE PROXY CARD PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
Please mark box if you plan to attend this meeting. o
To change the address on your account, please check the box at right and indicate your new address in the address space above.
Please note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be submitted via this method. o
Signature of Shareholder: Date:
Signature of Shareholder:
Date:
|
|
|
NOTE: |
|
Please sign exactly as your name or names appear(s) on this proxy. When shares are held
jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee
or guardian, please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full
corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a
partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person. |