e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number 001-33485
RSC Holdings Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
22-1669012 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
incorporation or organization) |
|
|
|
|
|
6929 E. Greenway Pkwy. |
|
|
Scottsdale, Arizona
|
|
85254 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
(480) 905-3300
(Registrants telephone number,
including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since
last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of July 15, 2011, there were 103,784,945 shares of no par value Common Stock outstanding.
Introductory Note
Unless the context otherwise requires, in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, (i) we, us
our and RSC Holdings means RSC Holdings Inc., (ii) RSC means RSC Equipment Rental, Inc. and
RSC Equipment Rental of Canada, Ltd, which are our operating entities and indirect wholly-owned
subsidiaries of RSC Holdings, and, when used in connection with disclosure relating to indebtedness
incurred under the Old Senior ABL Revolving Facility and Second Lien Term Facility, or the New
Senior ABL Revolving Facility and in connection with the 2014 Senior Unsecured Notes (the 2014
Notes), the 2017 Senior Secured Notes (the 2017 Notes), the 2019 Senior Unsecured Notes (the
2019 Notes) or the 2021 Senior Unsecured Notes (the 2021 Notes) (collectively the Notes), RSC
Holdings III, LLC, except as otherwise set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Cautionary Note for Forward-Looking Statements
All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q, including, without limitation, statements regarding our future financial position,
business strategy, budgets, projected costs and plans and objectives of management for future
operations, are forward-looking statements. In addition, forward-looking statements generally can
be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as may, plan, seek, will,
should, expect, intend, estimate, anticipate, believe or continue or the negative
thereof or variations thereon or similar terminology.
Forward-looking statements include the statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
regarding, among other things: management forecasts; efficiencies; cost savings and opportunities
to increase productivity and profitability; income and margins; liquidity; anticipated growth;
economies of scale; the economy; future economic performance; our ability to maintain liquidity
during adverse economic cycles and unfavorable external events; our business strategy; future
acquisitions and dispositions; litigation; potential and contingent liabilities; managements
plans; taxes; and refinancing of existing debt.
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are
reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct.
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations are
set forth below and disclosed in Risk Factors in Part II, Item 1A and elsewhere in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q. Factors that could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from
those projected include, but are not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
the effect of a further economic downturn or other factors resulting in a decline in
non-residential construction, non-construction maintenance, capital improvements and
capital investment; |
|
|
|
|
intense rental rate price pressure from competitors, some of whom are heavily
indebted and may significantly reduce their prices to generate cash to meet debt
covenants; from contractor customers, some of whom are bidding contracts at cost or below
to secure work for their remaining best employees; from industrial customers who
generally are experiencing profitability shortfalls in the current economic climate and
in return are asking all of their most significant suppliers for price reductions and
cost reduction ideas; |
|
|
|
|
the rental industrys ability to continue to sell used equipment through both the
retail and auction markets at prices sufficient to enable us to maintain orderly
liquidation values that support our borrowing base to meet our minimum availability and
to avoid covenant compliance requirements for leverage and fixed charge coverage
contained in our New Senior ABL Revolving Facility; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to comply with our debt covenants; |
|
|
|
|
risks related to the credit markets willingness to continue to lend to borrowers with a B rating; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to generate cash and/or incur additional indebtedness to finance equipment purchases; |
1
|
|
|
exposure to claims for personal injury, death and property damage resulting from the
use of equipment rented or sold by us; |
|
|
|
|
the effect of changes in laws and regulations, including those relating to employment
legislation, the environment and customer privacy, among others; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in fuel and, or supply costs; |
|
|
|
|
heavy reliance on centralized information technology systems; |
|
|
|
|
claims that the software products and information systems on which we rely infringe
on the intellectual property rights of others; and |
|
|
|
|
the other factors described in Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
under the caption Risk Factors. |
In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking statements
contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q might not prove to be accurate and you should not
place undue reliance upon them. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the filing date of
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
2
PART I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
RSC HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
37,763 |
|
|
$ |
3,510 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $7,925 and
$7,009 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
252,751 |
|
|
|
228,532 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
15,301 |
|
|
|
14,171 |
|
Deferred tax assets, net |
|
|
10,176 |
|
|
|
17,912 |
|
Prepaid expense and other current assets |
|
|
13,314 |
|
|
|
13,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
329,305 |
|
|
|
277,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $1,114,808 and
$1,089,843 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
1,504,511 |
|
|
|
1,336,424 |
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $218,437
and $208,495 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
111,237 |
|
|
|
110,779 |
|
Goodwill and other intangibles, net |
|
|
938,921 |
|
|
|
939,302 |
|
Deferred financing costs |
|
|
56,425 |
|
|
|
44,205 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
9,161 |
|
|
|
9,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,949,560 |
|
|
$ |
2,717,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Deficit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
384,207 |
|
|
$ |
193,819 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
124,869 |
|
|
|
119,608 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
25,231 |
|
|
|
25,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
534,307 |
|
|
|
338,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
2,143,139 |
|
|
|
2,043,887 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities, net |
|
|
304,954 |
|
|
|
330,862 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
26,330 |
|
|
|
41,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
3,008,730 |
|
|
|
2,755,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value, (500,000 shares authorized, no shares
issued and outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value, (300,000,000 shares authorized, 103,781,595
shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2011 and 103,551,078 shares
issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010) |
|
|
838,960 |
|
|
|
833,989 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(923,723 |
) |
|
|
(873,358 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
25,593 |
|
|
|
2,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders deficit |
|
|
(59,170 |
) |
|
|
(37,277 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders deficit |
|
$ |
2,949,560 |
|
|
$ |
2,717,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
RSC HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment rental revenue |
|
$ |
315,696 |
|
|
$ |
259,734 |
|
|
$ |
587,471 |
|
|
$ |
481,947 |
|
Sale of merchandise |
|
|
13,126 |
|
|
|
13,270 |
|
|
|
25,778 |
|
|
|
24,691 |
|
Sale of used rental equipment |
|
|
38,306 |
|
|
|
27,993 |
|
|
|
80,799 |
|
|
|
55,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
367,128 |
|
|
|
300,997 |
|
|
|
694,048 |
|
|
|
561,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of equipment rentals, excluding
depreciation |
|
|
157,706 |
|
|
|
141,948 |
|
|
|
306,682 |
|
|
|
271,240 |
|
Depreciation of rental equipment |
|
|
73,959 |
|
|
|
67,398 |
|
|
|
144,848 |
|
|
|
134,043 |
|
Cost of merchandise sales |
|
|
8,589 |
|
|
|
9,880 |
|
|
|
17,031 |
|
|
|
17,954 |
|
Cost of used rental equipment sales |
|
|
25,785 |
|
|
|
23,931 |
|
|
|
56,755 |
|
|
|
48,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues |
|
|
266,039 |
|
|
|
243,157 |
|
|
|
525,316 |
|
|
|
471,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
101,089 |
|
|
|
57,840 |
|
|
|
168,732 |
|
|
|
89,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
43,483 |
|
|
|
35,007 |
|
|
|
85,201 |
|
|
|
70,719 |
|
Depreciation and amortization of
non-rental equipment and intangibles |
|
|
10,691 |
|
|
|
9,910 |
|
|
|
20,916 |
|
|
|
19,967 |
|
Other operating gains, net |
|
|
(964 |
) |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
(1,683 |
) |
|
|
(2,450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses, net |
|
|
53,210 |
|
|
|
44,779 |
|
|
|
104,434 |
|
|
|
88,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
47,879 |
|
|
|
13,061 |
|
|
|
64,298 |
|
|
|
1,696 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
46,984 |
|
|
|
48,233 |
|
|
|
128,943 |
|
|
|
98,026 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other (income) expense, net |
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
(506 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before (provision) benefit
for income taxes |
|
|
1,064 |
|
|
|
(35,271 |
) |
|
|
(79,481 |
) |
|
|
(96,230 |
) |
(Provision) benefit for income taxes |
|
|
(997 |
) |
|
|
13,156 |
|
|
|
29,116 |
|
|
|
36,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
(22,115 |
) |
|
$ |
(50,365 |
) |
|
$ |
(59,943 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding used in
computing net income (loss) per common
share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
103,904 |
|
|
|
103,506 |
|
|
|
103,845 |
|
|
|
103,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
105,047 |
|
|
|
103,506 |
|
|
|
103,845 |
|
|
|
103,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
(0.21 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.49 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.58 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
(0.21 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.49 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.58 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
RSC HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(50,365 |
) |
|
$ |
(59,943 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
165,764 |
|
|
|
154,010 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
5,103 |
|
|
|
6,348 |
|
Amortization of original issue discount |
|
|
606 |
|
|
|
543 |
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
3,168 |
|
|
|
2,258 |
|
Gain on sales of rental and non-rental property and equipment, net of
non-cash write-offs |
|
|
(25,250 |
) |
|
|
(5,325 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(31,045 |
) |
|
|
(37,442 |
) |
Gain on settlement of insurance property claims |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,736 |
) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
15,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net on ineffective hedge |
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
33 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
(23,459 |
) |
|
|
(15,304 |
) |
Inventory |
|
|
(1,100 |
) |
|
|
877 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
5,389 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
191,813 |
|
|
|
122,854 |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
22,268 |
|
|
|
(2,669 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
273,143 |
|
|
|
169,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of rental equipment |
|
|
(367,347 |
) |
|
|
(146,966 |
) |
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(4,783 |
) |
|
|
(1,635 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of rental equipment |
|
|
80,799 |
|
|
|
55,099 |
|
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment |
|
|
3,204 |
|
|
|
1,652 |
|
Insurance proceeds from rental equipment and property claims |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(288,127 |
) |
|
|
(90,114 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from Old Senior ABL Revolving Facility |
|
|
72,000 |
|
|
|
84,000 |
|
Proceeds from New Senior ABL Revolving Facility |
|
|
407,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of 2021 Notes |
|
|
650,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on Old Senior ABL Revolving Facility |
|
|
(376,195 |
) |
|
|
(141,000 |
) |
Payments on New Senior ABL Revolving Facility |
|
|
(61,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payments on 2014 Notes |
|
|
(117,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payments for call premium on 2014 Notes |
|
|
(5,562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payments on Second Lien Term Facility |
|
|
(479,395 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payments on capital leases and other debt |
|
|
(14,329 |
) |
|
|
(15,969 |
) |
Payments for deferred financing costs |
|
|
(27,070 |
) |
|
|
(1,109 |
) |
Proceeds from stock option exercises |
|
|
1,803 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
Decrease in outstanding checks in excess of cash balances |
|
|
(1,922 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
48,330 |
|
|
|
(73,770 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rates on cash |
|
|
907 |
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
34,253 |
|
|
|
6,494 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
3,510 |
|
|
|
4,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
37,763 |
|
|
$ |
11,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
RSC HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(continued)
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
107,609 |
|
|
$ |
93,354 |
|
Cash paid (received) for taxes, net |
|
|
2,490 |
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of assets under capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
17,501 |
|
|
$ |
8,043 |
|
Accrued deferred financing costs |
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
RSC HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(1) Organization
Business and Basis of Presentation
Description of Business
RSC Holdings Inc. (RSC Holdings) and its wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively, the
Company) are engaged primarily in the rental of a diversified line of construction and industrial
equipment, geographically dispersed throughout the United States and Canada. At June 30, 2011, the
Companys total assets were $2,949.6 million, of which 94.8% and 5.2% were employed in the
Companys U.S. and Canadian operations, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the
Company generated approximately 84.6% of its revenues from equipment rentals, and it derived the
remaining 15.4% of its revenues from sales of used rental equipment, merchandise and other related items.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with the accounting policies described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2010 (the 2010 Form 10-K). In the opinion of management, the
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all material
adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of
financial results for the interim periods presented. Interim results of operations are not
necessarily indicative of full year results. Certain information and note disclosures have been
condensed or omitted as permitted under Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules and
regulations governing the preparation of interim financial reporting on Form 10-Q; as such, this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the 2010 Form 10-K.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) requires
management of the Company to make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reported
amount of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the period. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the
carrying amounts of long-lived assets, goodwill, and inventories; the allowance for doubtful
accounts; deferred income taxes; environmental liabilities; reserves for claims; assets and
obligations related to employee benefits; the fair value of derivative instruments and
determination of share-based compensation amounts. Management believes that its estimates and
assumptions are reasonable in the circumstances; however, actual results may differ from these
estimates.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued an amendment to the
existing guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income. Under the amended guidance,
entities have the option to present the components of net income and other comprehensive income in
either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive
statements. Entities no longer have the option of presenting the components of other comprehensive
income within the statement of changes in stockholders equity. For public entities, the amendment
is effective on a retrospective basis for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years,
beginning after December 15, 2011, which for the Company is the first quarter in 2012. The
adoption of this amendment will result in a change to the Companys current presentation of
comprehensive income.
In May 2011, the FASB issued amendments to the existing guidance on fair value measurement. The
amendments are intended to create consistency between U.S. generally accepted accounting standards
and International Financial Reporting Standards on measuring fair value and disclosing information
about fair value
7
RSC HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)
measurements. The amendments clarify the application of existing fair value measurement
requirements including (i) the application of the highest and best use valuation premise concepts,
(ii) measuring the fair value of an instrument classified in a reporting entitys shareholders
equity, and (iii) quantitative information required for fair value measurements categorized within
Level 3. In addition, the amendments require additional disclosure for Level 3 measurements
regarding the sensitivity of fair value to changes in unobservable inputs and any
interrelationships between those inputs. For public entities, the amendments are effective for
interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, which for the Company is calendar
year 2012. These changes are required to be applied prospectively. The Company does not anticipate
that the adoption of these amendments will have a material impact on its financial condition or
results of operations.
In December 2010, the FASB issued an update to the existing guidance for goodwill and other
intangible assets. The update modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units
with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to
perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if there are qualitative factors indicating that it
is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. The qualitative factors are consistent
with the existing guidance which requires goodwill of a reporting unit to be tested for impairment
between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not
reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. This guidance is effective
for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010, which
for the Company is the fourth quarter of 2011. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption
of this guidance will have a material impact on its financial condition, results of operations or
cash flows.
In November 2010, the FASB issued an update to its existing guidance on business combinations.
This guidance requires a public entity that presents comparative financial statements to present
in its pro forma disclosure the revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business
combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the prior
annual reporting period. In addition, this guidance expands the supplemental pro forma disclosures
to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments
directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and
earnings. The guidance is effective prospectively for business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period on or after
December 15, 2010, which for the Company is calendar year 2011. The guidance did not have an impact
on the Companys disclosures for the six months ended June 30, 2011.
(2) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value of a financial instrument is the exit price, representing the amount that would
be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants. The carrying values of cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable
approximate fair values due to the short maturity of these financial instruments.
The fair values of the Companys 2014 Notes, 2017 Notes, 2019 Notes and 2021 Notes are based
on quoted market prices. The fair value of the Companys New Senior ABL Revolving Facility is
estimated based on borrowing rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms
and maturities. The fair value of capital lease obligations approximates the carrying value due to
the fact that the underlying instruments include provisions to adjust interest rates to approximate
fair market value.
See Note 6 for additional fair market information related to debt instruments and Note 8 for
additional information about measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities.
8
RSC HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)
(3) Net Income (Loss) per Common Share
Basic net income (loss) per common share and diluted net loss per common share have been
computed using the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.
Diluted net income per common share has been computed using the weighted average number of shares
of common stock outstanding during the period, increased to give effect to any potentially dilutive
securities.
The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in 000s except per share data) |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
(22,115 |
) |
|
$ |
(50,365 |
) |
|
$ |
(59,943 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares basic |
|
|
103,904 |
|
|
|
103,506 |
|
|
|
103,845 |
|
|
|
103,491 |
|
Employee stock options |
|
|
1,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares diluted |
|
|
105,047 |
|
|
|
103,506 |
|
|
|
103,845 |
|
|
|
103,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share basic |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
(0.21 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.49 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.58 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) per common share diluted |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
(0.21 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.49 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.58 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive stock based awards excluded |
|
|
2,056 |
|
|
|
6,703 |
|
|
|
7,202 |
|
|
|
6,377 |
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2010 and the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, no
shares of common stock underlying stock options and unvested restricted stock units were included
in the computation of diluted net loss per common share because the inclusion of such shares would
be anti-dilutive based on the net loss reported.
(4) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components as of June 30, 2011 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
Fair Market |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Currency |
|
|
Value of Cash |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Translation |
|
|
Flow Hedges |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
(in 000s) |
|
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
21,722 |
|
|
$ |
(19,630 |
) |
|
$ |
2,092 |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
3,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,871 |
|
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,630 |
|
|
|
19,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
25,593 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in 000s) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
(22,115 |
) |
|
$ |
(50,365 |
) |
|
$ |
(59,943 |
) |
Currency translation adjustments |
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
(3,622 |
) |
|
|
3,871 |
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
Change in fair value of cash
flow hedges, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
19,630 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
702 |
|
|
$ |
(25,838 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,864 |
) |
|
$ |
(59,965 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
RSC HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)
(5) Closed Location Charges
The Company regularly reviews the financial performance of its locations to identify those
with operating margins that consistently fall below the Companys performance standards. The
Company also reviews the financial performance of groups of locations to identify those that are
underperforming relative to the Companys standards. Once identified, the Company continues to
monitor these locations or groups of locations to determine if operating performance can be
improved or if the performance is attributable to economic factors unique to the particular market
with long-term prospects that are not favorable. If necessary, locations with unfavorable
long-term prospects are closed and the rental fleet is deployed to more profitable locations with
higher demand.
During
the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company closed or
consolidated ten locations.
During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company closed or consolidated 12 locations. The
closed location reserves at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, consist primarily of employee
termination costs, costs to terminate operating leases prior to the end of their contractual lease
term and estimated costs that will continue to be incurred under operating leases that have no
future economic benefit to the Company. Freight costs to transport fleet from closed locations to
other locations and the write-off of leasehold improvements are expensed as incurred. Except in
instances where a lease settlement agreement has been negotiated with a landlord, costs recognized
to terminate operating leases before the end of their contractual term represent the estimated fair
value of the liability at the cease-use date. The fair value of the liability is determined based
on the present value of remaining lease rentals, reduced by estimated sublease rentals that could
be reasonably obtained for the property even if the Company does not intend to enter into a
sublease. Although the Company does not expect to incur additional material charges for location
closures occurring prior to June 30, 2011, additional charges are possible to the extent that
actual future settlements differ from the Companys estimates. The Company cannot predict the
extent of future location closures or the financial impact of such closings, if any.
Closed location charges (to be cash settled) by type and a reconciliation of the associated
accrued liability were as follows (in 000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease Exit and |
|
|
Employee |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Related |
|
|
Termination |
|
|
Exit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs (a) |
|
|
Costs (b) |
|
|
Costs (c) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Closed location reserves at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
(4,265 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(4,265 |
) |
Charges incurred to close locations |
|
|
(1,111 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
(1,232 |
) |
Cash payments |
|
|
1,379 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
1,495 |
|
Adjustments to reserve |
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closed location reserves at June 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
(4,119 |
) |
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(4,124 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Lease exit and other related costs are included within cost of equipment rentals in the
condensed consolidated statements of operations. The lease exit portion of the closed
location reserves at June 30, 2011 are expected to be paid over the remaining contractual term
of the leases, which range from three to 81 months. |
|
(b) |
|
Employee termination costs primarily consist of severance payments and related benefits. For
the six months ended June 30, 2011, these costs are included within cost of equipment rentals
in the condensed consolidated statement of operations. |
|
(c) |
|
Other exit costs include costs incurred primarily to transport fleet from closed locations to
other locations. These costs are included within cost of equipment rentals in the condensed
consolidated statements of operations. |
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company also recognized $0.8 million of
other severance costs not directly associated with location closures. Of the additional severance
expense recognized, $0.6 million is included within cost of equipment rentals and $0.2 million is
included within selling, general and administrative expenses in the unaudited condensed
consolidated statement of operations.
10
RSC HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)
(6) Debt
Debt consists of the following at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
Financing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate (a) |
|
|
Date |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Debt |
|
|
Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in 000s) |
|
|
|
|
|
New Senior ABL Revolving Facility |
|
|
2.69 |
% |
|
Feb. 2016 |
|
$ |
20,999 |
|
|
$ |
346,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Old Senior ABL Revolving
Facility |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304,195 |
|
Second Lien Term Facility |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
479,395 |
|
2014 Notes |
|
|
9.50 |
% |
|
Dec. 2014 |
|
|
8,618 |
|
|
|
503,000 |
|
|
|
620,000 |
|
2017 Notes |
|
|
10.50 |
% |
|
Jul. 2017 |
|
|
7,896 |
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
2019 Notes |
|
|
10.50 |
% |
|
Nov. 2019 |
|
|
4,728 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
2021 Notes |
|
|
8.25 |
% |
|
Feb. 2021 |
|
|
14,184 |
|
|
|
650,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized lease obligations (d) |
|
|
1.80 |
% |
|
Various |
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,961 |
|
|
|
77,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
56,425 |
|
|
|
2,179,961 |
|
|
|
2,081,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original issue discounts (e) |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,591 |
) |
|
|
(12,197 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,168,370 |
|
|
$ |
2,069,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Estimated interest rate presented is the effective interest rate as of June 30, 2011
including the effect of original issue discounts, where applicable, and excluding the effects
of deferred financing costs. |
|
(b) |
|
In February 2011, the Company repaid the outstanding balance of the Old Senior ABL Revolving
Facility and replaced it with the New Senior ABL Revolving Facility due February 2016. As a
result, the Company classified the outstanding balance on the Old Senior ABL Revolving
Facility as long-term debt at December 31, 2010. Had the Company not entered into the New
Senior ABL Revolving Facility, $78.4 million of the outstanding balance on the Old Senior ABL
Revolving Facility at December 31, 2010 would have been due November 2011 with the remaining
$225.8 million due August 2013. See New Senior ABL Revolving Facility below for additional
information. |
|
(c) |
|
In January 2011, the Company repaid the $479.4 million outstanding balance on the Second Lien
Term Facility using proceeds received from the sale of the 2021 Notes. See $650.0 million
Senior Unsecured Notes Offering below for additional information. |
|
(d) |
|
Capital leases include $25.2 million and $55.8 million of obligations that are classified as
current and long-term debt, respectively, at June 30, 2011. |
|
(e) |
|
The original issue discounts represent the unamortized difference between the $400.0 million
aggregate principal amount of the 2017 Notes and the proceeds received upon issuance and the
unamortized difference between the $200.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 2019 Notes
and the proceeds received upon issuance. |
As of June 30, 2011, the Company had $641.1 million available for borrowing under the New
Senior ABL Revolving Facility. A portion of the New Senior ABL Revolving Facility is available for
the issuance of letters of credit and swingline loans, which are seven day loans that can be drawn
on the same day as requested for an amount not to exceed $25.0 million. The Company is in
compliance with all applicable debt covenants as of June 30, 2011.
11
RSC HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)
As of June 30, 2011, the estimated fair value of the Companys debt was as follows (in 000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
New Senior ABL Revolving Facility |
|
$ |
346,000 |
|
2014 Notes |
|
|
518,090 |
|
2017 Notes |
|
|
450,000 |
|
2019 Notes |
|
|
221,000 |
|
2021 Notes |
|
|
648,375 |
|
Capitalized lease obligations |
|
|
80,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,264,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
$650.0 million Senior Unsecured Notes Offering
On January 19, 2011, the Company completed a private offering of $650.0 million aggregate
principal amount of 8.25% senior unsecured notes due February 2021 (the 2021 Notes). The
proceeds from the sale of the 2021 Notes were used to repay the outstanding balance on the
Companys Second Lien Term Facility, which totaled $479.4 million plus accrued interest of $0.7
million, redeem a portion of the 2014 Notes as described below, settle the Companys outstanding
interest rate swap obligations of $35.1 million and pay a portion of the transaction costs incurred
with the issuance of the 2021 Notes. The transaction costs, which totaled $14.6 million, were
capitalized as deferred financing costs and are being amortized to interest expense over the term
of the 2021 Notes using the effective interest rate method. On February 21, 2011, the Company
redeemed $117.0 million of aggregate principal of the Companys 2014 Notes, paid accrued interest
of $2.5 million on the 2014 Notes and incurred a call premium of $5.6 million, which was funded
with the remaining proceeds from the 2021 Notes and in part from a draw on the Companys New Senior
ABL Revolving Facility. As a result of the Second Lien Term Facility repayment and the partial
repayment of the 2014 Notes, the Company expensed $7.3 million of unamortized deferred financing
costs, which together with the $5.6 million in call premiums, is characterized as a loss on
extinguishment of debt in the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months
ended June 30, 2011. The settlement of the Companys interest rate swaps resulted in a charge of
$33.9 million, which is characterized as interest expense in the condensed consolidated statement
of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company initiated and completed an exchange
offer where the holders of the 2021 Notes could exchange such unregistered notes for new,
registered notes. The terms of the new, registered notes offered in the exchange offer are
identical in all material respects to the terms of the unregistered notes, except that the new
notes are registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and do not contain restrictions on transfer.
New Senior ABL Revolving Facility
On February 9, 2011, the Company entered into the New Senior ABL Revolving Facility, which
replaced its Old Senior ABL Revolving Facility, and borrowed $383.0 million of loans under the New
Senior ABL Revolving Facility. The proceeds of these loans were used to repay the outstanding
balance on the Companys Old Senior ABL Revolving Facility, which totaled $370.2 million plus
accrued interest and other fees of $1.1 million, and to pay a portion of transaction costs
including legal fees. Total transaction costs of $12.3 million were capitalized as deferred
financing costs and are being amortized to interest expense over the term of the New Senior ABL
Revolving Facility. In addition, the Company wrote off $2.4 million of unamortized deferred
financing costs associated with the Old Senior ABL Revolving Facility, which is included in the
loss on extinguishment of debt in the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six
months ended June 30, 2011. The Companys New Senior ABL Revolving Facility, which is due February
2016, provides commitments for aggregate borrowings of approximately $1,100.0 million subject to,
among other things, the Companys maintenance of a sufficient borrowing base under such facility.
The borrowing base reporting requirements that the Company is subject to, under the New Senior ABL
Revolving Facility are substantially similar to those under the Old Senior ABL Revolving Facility.
12
RSC HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)
Interest Rate Swaps
In September 2007, the Company entered into four forward-starting interest rate swap
agreements covering a combined notional amount of debt totaling $700.0 million. The objective of
the swaps was to effectively hedge the
cash flow risk associated with a portion of the Second Lien Term Facility which had variable
interest rates. In November 2009, the Company entered into two reverse swaps to offset a portion
of the fixed rate payments under certain other swap agreements that were de-designated as cash flow
hedges in November 2009. All interest rate swaps and reverse swaps in effect at December 31, 2010
were settled on January 19, 2011 in conjunction with the debt transactions described above. See
Note 7 for additional information.
(7) Derivative Instruments
The Company is exposed to market risk associated with changes in interest rates under existing
floating-rate debt. At the Companys election, the interest rate per annum applicable to the
Second Lien Term Facility, which was repaid in January 2011, was based on a fluctuating rate of
interest measured by reference to an adjusted London interbank offered rate, or (LIBOR), plus a
borrowing margin; or an alternate base rate plus a borrowing margin. To hedge exposure to market
conditions, reduce the volatility of financing costs and achieve a desired balance between
fixed-rate and floating-rate debt, the Company has utilized interest rate swaps under which it has
exchanged floating-rate interest payments for fixed-rate interest payments. The Company does not
use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
The Company formally documents its risk management objectives and strategy for undertaking
each swap at the contracts inception and assesses whether the hedging relationship is expected to
be highly effective in achieving cash flows that offset changes in interest payments resulting from
fluctuations in the benchmark rate. An assessment of the effectiveness of derivative instruments
designated as cash flow hedges is performed on a quarterly basis using the perfectly effective
hypothetical derivative method. Gains or losses resulting from changes in the fair value of
derivatives designated as cash flow hedges are reported as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) for the portion of the derivative instrument determined to be
effective. Gains and losses reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are
reclassified into earnings as interest income or expense in the periods during which the hedged
transaction affects earnings. Gains or losses resulting from changes in the fair value of
derivatives designated as cash flow hedges are reported as interest expense for the portion of the
derivative instrument determined to be ineffective. The ineffective portion of the liabilities for
derivatives qualifying as cash flow hedges totaled $104,000 at December 31, 2010. As previously
described, the Company settled all interest rate swaps in effect at December 31, 2010 on January
19, 2011. The Company does not have any outstanding interest rate swaps as of June 30, 2011. In
connection with the Companys interest rate swap settlements, the Company paid $35.1 million of
which $33.9 million was recognized as interest expense in the six months ended June 30, 2011. The
difference of $1.2 million was recognized as interest expense in November 2009 when certain of the
Companys interest rate swaps were de-designated as cash flow hedges.
When the Companys derivative instruments are in a net liability position, the Company is
exposed to its own credit risk. When the Companys derivative instruments are in a net asset
position, the Company is exposed to credit losses in the event of non-performance by counterparties
to its hedging derivatives. To manage credit risks, the Company carefully selects counterparties,
conducts transactions with multiple counterparties which limits its exposure to any single
counterparty and monitors the market position of the program and its relative market position with
each counterparty.
13
RSC HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)
The fair value of liabilities associated with the Companys interest rate swaps and cumulative
losses resulting from changes in the fair value of the effective portion of derivative instruments
designated as hedging instruments and recognized within accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) (OCIL) were as follows (in 000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss in |
|
Loss in |
|
|
Fair |
|
Fair |
|
Accumulated |
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Value of |
|
Value of |
|
OCIL |
|
OCIL |
Derivative Type |
|
Swap Liabilities |
|
Swap Liabilities |
|
(Net of Tax)(a) |
|
(Net of Tax) |
Interest rate
swaps designated as
hedges |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
$ |
32,285 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
$ |
19,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
not designated as
hedges |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
$ |
1,388 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The Company settled its interest rate swaps and reverse swaps in January 2011 and in
doing so reclassified all related losses in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
into earnings. |
The effect of derivative instruments on comprehensive loss for the six months ended June
30, 2011 was as follows (in 000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Reclassified from |
|
Gain |
|
|
Loss Recognized in |
|
Accumulated OCIL into |
|
Recognized on |
|
|
Accumulated OCIL |
|
Expense |
|
Ineffective Portion |
Derivative Type |
|
(Net of Tax) |
|
(Net of Tax) |
|
of Derivatives |
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,630 |
|
|
$ |
104 |
|
For
the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recognized a loss of
$80,000 on interest rate swaps not designated as hedging instruments. The loss was included within
interest expense, net in the condensed consolidated statement of
operations.
(8) Fair Value
Measurements
Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset
or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such,
fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market
participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. GAAP establishes a three-tier fair value
hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
|
|
Level 1 Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; |
|
|
|
Level 2 Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are
observable either directly or indirectly; and |
|
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which
require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions. |
As of June 30, 2011, no assets or liabilities were measured at fair value on a recurring or
nonrecurring basis.
14
RSC HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(Unaudited)
(9) Income Tax
The provision for income taxes was $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The
benefit for income taxes was $13.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The effective
tax rate was 93.7% and 37.3% during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The Companys effective tax rate normally differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35%
primarily due to certain non-deductible permanent
items, state income taxes and certain state minimum and gross receipts taxes, which are
incurred regardless of whether the Company earns income. The Companys high effective tax rate
during the three months ended June 30, 2011 is primarily due to the impact of state gross receipts taxes totaling $0.2 million in the second quarter of 2011
when combined with low pre-tax net income.
The benefit for income taxes was $29.1 million and $36.3 million for the six months ended June
30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and resulted from a pre-tax net loss for both periods. The
effective tax rate was 36.6% and 37.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. The Companys effective tax rate normally differs from the U.S. federal statutory
rate of 35% primarily due to certain non-deductible permanent items, state income taxes and certain
state minimum and gross receipts taxes, which are incurred regardless of whether the Company earns
income. The Companys effective tax rate decreased due to the effect of enacted state tax rate
changes applied to the Companys deferred balances during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
(10) Subsequent Event
On July 8, 2011, the Company acquired the assets and operations of Independent Aerial
Equipment (IAE), a privately held equipment rental company. Substantially all of the assets and
operations, which consist primarily of rental fleet and three stores in New Jersey, Pennsylvania
and Maryland, were acquired in exchange for cash consideration of approximately $49.0 million subject to
certain post-close adjustments. The Company financed the acquisition of IAE by
borrowing the funds from the New Senior ABL Revolving Facility.
15
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Statements in this managements discussion and analysis regarding industry outlook, our
expectations regarding the performance of our business and other non-historical statements are
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and
uncertainties. See Cautionary Note for Forward-Looking Statements on page 1 of this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q. Our actual results may differ materially from those contained in, or implied
by, any forward-looking statements.
The following discussion is intended to enhance the readers understanding of our business
operations and present business environment. It should be read in conjunction with our 2010 Form
10-K, the section entitled Risk Factors in Part II, Item 1A herein and our unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 included in this
Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q.
Overview
We are one of the largest equipment rental providers in North America. We operate through a
network of 449 rental locations across ten regions in 42 U.S. states and three Canadian provinces
and service customers primarily in the industrial or non-construction, and non-residential
construction markets. We rent a broad selection of equipment ranging from large equipment such as
backhoes, forklifts, air compressors, scissor lifts, aerial work platform booms and skid-steer
loaders to smaller items such as pumps, generators, welders and electric hand tools. We also sell
used equipment, parts, merchandise and supplies for customers maintenance, repair and operations.
For the three months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, we generated approximately 86.0%
and 86.3% of our revenues from equipment rentals, respectively, and we derived the remaining 14.0%
and 13.7% of our revenues from sales of used rental equipment, merchandise and other related items,
respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, we generated approximately
84.6% and 85.8% of our revenues from equipment rentals, respectively, and we derived the remaining
15.4% and 14.2% of our revenues from sales of used rental equipment, merchandise and other related
items, respectively.
The following table summarizes our total revenues, income (loss) before (provision) benefit
for income taxes and net income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
(in 000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Total revenues |
|
$ |
367,128 |
|
|
$ |
300,997 |
|
|
$ |
694,048 |
|
|
$ |
561,737 |
|
Income (loss)
before (provision)
benefit for income
taxes |
|
|
1,064 |
|
|
|
(35,271 |
) |
|
|
(79,481 |
) |
|
|
(96,230 |
) |
Net income (loss) |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
(22,115 |
) |
|
|
(50,365 |
) |
|
|
(59,943 |
) |
We manage our operations through the application of a disciplined, yet highly flexible
business model, in which we utilize various financial and operating metrics to measure our
operating performance and make decisions on the acquisition and disposal of rental fleet and the
allocation of resources to and among our locations. Key metrics that we regularly review on a
consolidated basis include Adjusted EBITDA, fleet utilization, average fleet age and original
equipment fleet cost. The following is a summary of these key operating metrics:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended (or at) |
|
Six Months Ended (or at) |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2010 |
Adjusted EBITDA (in millions) (a) |
|
$ |
134.4 |
|
|
$ |
92.0 |
|
|
$ |
233.2 |
|
|
$ |
158.0 |
|
Fleet utilization (b) |
|
|
67.8 |
% |
|
|
63.5 |
% |
|
|
65.8 |
% |
|
|
59.2 |
% |
Average fleet age at period end (months) (c) |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Original equipment fleet cost at period end
(in millions) (d) |
|
$ |
2,537 |
|
|
$ |
2,337 |
|
|
$ |
2,537 |
|
|
$ |
2,337 |
|
16
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Defined as consolidated net income (loss) before net interest expense, income taxes and
depreciation and amortization and before certain other items, including loss on
extinguishment of debt, share-based compensation and other (income) expense, net. Adjusted
EBITDA is not a recognized measure under GAAP. See reconciliation between net income
(loss) and Adjusted EBITDA and reconciliation between net cash provided by operating
activities and Adjusted EBITDA under Liquidity and Capital Resources Adjusted EBITDA. |
|
(b) |
|
Defined as the average aggregate dollar value of equipment rented by customers (based
on original equipment fleet cost or OEC) during the relevant period, divided by the
average aggregate dollar value of all equipment owned (based on OEC) during the relevant
period. |
|
(c) |
|
Defined as the number of months since an equipment unit was first placed in service,
weighted by multiplying individual equipment ages by their respective original costs and
dividing the sum of those individual calculations by the total original cost. Equipment
refurbished by the original equipment manufacturer is considered new. |
|
(d) |
|
Defined as the original dollar value of rental equipment purchased from the original
equipment manufacturer (OEM). Fleet purchased from non-OEM sources is assigned a
comparable OEC dollar value at the time of purchase. |
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, our Adjusted EBITDA increased $42.4 million
and $75.2 million, respectively, from $92.0 million in the second quarter of 2010 to $134.4 million
in the second quarter of 2011 and from $158.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to
$233.2 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011. The $42.4 million increase in Adjusted EBITDA
in the three months ended June 30, 2011 was due primarily to a $40.2 million increase in equipment
rental margins, excluding depreciation. Equipment rental margins, excluding depreciation, were
higher during the 2011 three-month period due to a 15.2% increase in rental volume and a 6.3%
increase in rental rates. The $75.2 million increase in Adjusted EBITDA in the six months ended
June 30, 2011 was due primarily to a $70.1 million increase in equipment rental margins, excluding
depreciation, and a $17.5 million increase in used rental equipment sales margins offset by a $14.5
million increase in selling, general and administrative expenses. Equipment rental margins,
excluding depreciation, were higher during the 2011 six-month period due to a 17.6% increase in
rental volume and a 4.3% increase in rental rates. Used rental equipment margins were higher during
the six months ended June 30, 2011 due to an improvement in margins on used rental equipment sold
through both retail and auction channels. The increase in selling, general and administrative
expenses was driven by increases in administrative and sales force wages and benefits, travel and
meeting costs and professional fees.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, our utilization increased 430 basis points
and 660 basis points, as compared to the same prior year periods. The increase in utilization was
driven primarily by rising demand for our rental equipment.
Average fleet age at June 30, 2011 was 41 months, down one month, from 42 months at June 30,
2010. The decline was due to rental fleet purchases, which totaled approximately $548 million in
the twelve months ended June 30, 2011.
OEC at June 30, 2011 was $2,537 million, up 8.6% from $2,337 million at June 30, 2010. The
increase consists primarily of rental equipment purchases of approximately $548 million in the
twelve months ended June 30, 2011 offset primarily by used equipment sales at OEC in the twelve
months ended June 30, 2011.
17
Business Environment and Outlook
Our revenues and operating results are driven in large part by activities in the industrial or
non-construction market and the non-residential construction market. On a combined basis we
currently derive approximately 97% of our rental revenues from these two markets.
The industrial or non-construction market generated approximately 62% of our rental revenues
during the six months ended June 30, 2011. The non-residential construction market generated
approximately 35% of our rental revenues during the six months ended June 30, 2011. Generally, the
industrial or non-construction market is less exposed to cyclicality than the non-residential
construction market.
In the beginning of 2010, demand for our rental equipment remained weak and year over year
rental rates were negative due to a continuation of the economic recession, which began in late
2008. During the second quarter of 2010 and continuing through the twelve months ended June 30,
2011, market conditions improved, which translated into strengthening demand for our rental
equipment as fleet on rent increased approximately 13.9% at June 30, 2011 as compared to June 30,
2010. In addition, fleet utilization for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was 65.8%, an increase
of 660 basis points from 59.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in fleet
utilization was despite an approximate 5% increase in average OEC in the first six months of 2011
versus the first six months of 2010. The increased demand for our rental equipment also
contributed to improved pricing as rental rates increased 4.3% in the six months ended June 30,
2011 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010. We expect year-over-year rental rates,
fleet on rent and utilization in the third quarter of 2011 to be favorable to the third quarter of
2010. Year-over-year comparisons for rental revenues in the third quarter of 2011 are also
expected to be favorable.
Subsequent Event
On July 8, 2011, we acquired the assets and operations of Independent Aerial Equipment
(IAE), a privately held equipment rental company. Substantially all of the assets and
operations, which consist primarily of rental fleet and three stores in New Jersey, Pennsylvania
and Maryland, were acquired in exchange for cash consideration of approximately $49.0 million subject to
certain post-close adjustments. We financed the acquisition of IAE by borrowing the funds from the New Senior ABL Revolving Facility.
Factors Affecting Our Results of Operations
Our revenues and operating results are driven in large part by activities in the industrial or
non-construction market and the non-residential construction market. These markets are cyclical
with activity levels that tend to increase in line with growth in gross domestic product and
decline during times of economic weakness; however, the industrial or non-construction market is
historically less exposed to cyclicality than the non-residential construction market. In addition,
activity in the construction market tends to be susceptible to seasonal fluctuations in certain
parts of the country. This results in changes in demand for our rental equipment. The cyclicality
and seasonality of the equipment rental industry result in variable demand and, therefore, our
revenues and operating results may fluctuate from period to period.
18
Results of Operations
Revenues:
|
|
|
Equipment rental revenue consists of fees charged to customers for use of equipment
owned by us over the term of the rental as well as other fees charged to customers for
items such as delivery and pickup, fuel and damage waivers. |
|
|
|
|
Sale of merchandise revenues represents sales of contractor supplies, replacement parts,
consumables and ancillary products and, to a lesser extent, new equipment. |
|
|
|
|
Sale of used rental equipment represents revenues derived from the sale of rental
equipment that has previously been included in our rental fleet. |
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
Cost of equipment rentals, excluding depreciation, consists primarily of wages and
benefits for employees involved in the delivery and maintenance of rental equipment, rental
location facility costs and rental equipment repair and maintenance expenses. |
|
|
|
Depreciation of rental equipment consists of straight-line depreciation of equipment
included in our rental fleet. |
|
|
|
Cost of merchandise sales represents the costs of acquiring those items. |
|
|
|
Cost of used rental equipment sales represents the net book value of rental equipment at
the date of sale. |
Selling, general and administrative costs primarily include sales force compensation,
information technology costs, advertising and marketing costs, professional fees and administrative
overhead.
Depreciation and amortization of non-rental equipment and intangibles consists of
straight-line depreciation of vehicles and equipment used to support our operations, leasehold
improvements and amortization of intangible assets with finite useful lives.
Other operating (gains) losses, net are gains and losses resulting from the disposition of
non-rental assets. Other operating gains and losses represent the difference between proceeds
received upon disposition of non-rental assets (if any) and the net book value of the asset at the
time of disposition. Other operating (gains) losses, net also include insurance proceeds from
rental and equipment claims in excess of losses incurred.
19
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011, Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
The following table sets forth for each of the periods indicated our statements of operations
data and expresses revenue and expense data as a percentage of total revenues for the periods
presented (in 000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 versus 2010 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment rental revenue |
|
$ |
315,696 |
|
|
$ |
259,734 |
|
|
|
86.0 |
% |
|
|
86.3 |
% |
|
$ |
55,962 |
|
|
|
21.5 |
% |
Sale of merchandise |
|
|
13,126 |
|
|
|
13,270 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
Sale of used rental equipment |
|
|
38,306 |
|
|
|
27,993 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
10,313 |
|
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
367,128 |
|
|
|
300,997 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
66,131 |
|
|
|
22.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of equipment rentals,
excluding depreciation |
|
|
157,706 |
|
|
|
141,948 |
|
|
|
43.0 |
|
|
|
47.2 |
|
|
|
15,758 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
Depreciation of rental equipment |
|
|
73,959 |
|
|
|
67,398 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
|
6,561 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
Cost of merchandise sales |
|
|
8,589 |
|
|
|
9,880 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
(1,291 |
) |
|
|
(13.1 |
) |
Cost of used rental equipment
sales |
|
|
25,785 |
|
|
|
23,931 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
1,854 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues |
|
|
266,039 |
|
|
|
243,157 |
|
|
|
72.5 |
|
|
|
80.8 |
|
|
|
22,882 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
101,089 |
|
|
|
57,840 |
|
|
|
27.5 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
43,249 |
|
|
|
74.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative |
|
|
43,483 |
|
|
|
35,007 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
8,476 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
of non-rental equipment and
intangibles |
|
|
10,691 |
|
|
|
9,910 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
781 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
Other operating gains, net |
|
|
(964 |
) |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
(826 |
) |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses, net |
|
|
53,210 |
|
|
|
44,779 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
8,431 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
47,879 |
|
|
|
13,061 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
34,818 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
46,984 |
|
|
|
48,233 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
(1,249 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
Other (income) expense, net |
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
(268 |
) |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before
(provision) benefit for
income taxes |
|
|
1,064 |
|
|
|
(35,271 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(11.7 |
) |
|
|
36,335 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
(Provision) benefit for income
taxes |
|
|
(997 |
) |
|
|
13,156 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
(14,153 |
) |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
(22,115 |
) |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
(7.3 |
)% |
|
$ |
22,182 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues increased $66.1 million, or 22.0%, from $301.0 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2010 to $367.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Equipment rental
revenue increased $56.0 million, or 21.5% from $259.7 million for the three months ended June 30,
2010 to $315.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in equipment rental
revenue is primarily the result of a $39.7 million, or 15.2%, increase in rental volume and a $16.3
million, or 6.3%, increase in rental rates. The increase in rental volume is inclusive of a $1.2
million increase due to currency rate changes.
Sale of merchandise revenues decreased $0.1 million, or 1.1%, from $13.3 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2010 to $13.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease
consisted of a decrease in merchandise sales of $0.5 million offset by a $0.4 million increase in
parts sales.
Revenues from the sale of used rental equipment increased $10.3 million, or 36.8%, from $28.0
million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to $38.3 million for the three months ended June
30, 2011. The increase was due to an approximate 22% increase in volume combined with improved
pricing in both auction and retail channels.
20
Used equipment sales at OEC for the three months
ended June 30, 2011 totaled $78.4 million and represent a normal part of the rental fleet life
cycle.
Cost of equipment rentals, excluding depreciation, increased $15.8 million, or 11.1%, from
$141.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to $157.7 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2011, due primarily to the 15.2% increase in rental volume. Cost of equipment
rentals excluding depreciation, as a percentage of equipment rental revenues decreased from 54.7%
for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to 50.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 due to a
6.3% increase in equipment rental rates. Unlike increases in rental volume, increases in equipment
rental rates are not accompanied by an increase in cost of equipment rentals.
Depreciation of rental equipment increased $6.6 million, or 9.7%, from $67.4 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2010 to $74.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The
increase in depreciation of rental equipment was due largely to an approximate 7% increase in
average OEC. The increase in average OEC was driven by $209.4 million of rental equipment
purchases, net of $78.4 million of used equipment sales at OEC in the three months ended June 30,
2011. As a percent of equipment rental revenues, depreciation of rental equipment decreased from
25.9% in the three months ended June 30, 2010 to 23.4% in the three months ended June 30, 2011.
This decrease was due primarily to an increase in fleet utilization during the second quarter of
2011 as compared to the second quarter of 2010 combined with a 6.3% increase in rental rates.
Cost of merchandise sales decreased $1.3 million, or 13.1%, from $9.9 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2010 to $8.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Gross margin
for merchandise sales increased from 25.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to 34.6% for
the three months ended June 30, 2011 due primarily to margin improvements on non-stock sales.
Cost of used rental equipment sales increased $1.9 million, or 7.7%, from $23.9 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2010 to $25.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The
increase is due primarily to an increase in the volume of used rental equipment sold during the
three months ended June 30, 2011. Gross margin for the sale of used rental equipment increased
from 14.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to 32.7% for the three months ended June 30,
2011. The increase was reflected in higher margins on used equipment sold through both retail and
auction channels and was driven by strengthening demand for used rental equipment.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $8.5 million, or 24.2%, from $35.0
million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to $43.5 million for the three months ended June
30, 2011. The increase is due primarily to increases in administrative and sales force wages and
benefits, travel and meeting costs and professional fees. Administrative and sales force wages and
benefits increased $4.4 million in the 2011 versus 2010 second quarter and consisted primarily of a
$2.0 million increase in sales commissions, a $1.4 million increase in direct wages and a $1.0
million increase in variable compensation. The increase in sales commission was due primarily to
increases in equipment rental revenues and the sale of used rental equipment. The increase in
direct wages was due primarily to an increase in headcount. Travel and meeting costs increased
approximately $1.9 million and professional fees increased $1.5 million. Selling, general and
administrative expenses increased as a percentage of total revenues from 11.6% for the three months
ended June 30, 2010 to 11.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2011.
Depreciation and amortization of non-rental equipment and intangibles increased $0.8 million,
or 7.9%, from $9.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to $10.7 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2011. The increase is due to an increase in depreciation on non-rental
vehicles and trailers due to a larger fleet.
Other operating gains, net were $1.0 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 and
consisted primarily of gains on the sale of non-rental delivery
vehicles and trailers. Other operating gains, net were
$0.1 million in the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Interest expense was $47.0 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011, down $1.2 million
from $48.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease was due to lower debt
rates on our 2021
21
Notes as compared to the average rate on our Second Lien Term Facility, which was repaid in
January 2011 and the rate on our 2014 Notes, which were partially repaid in February 2011. The
decrease in interest expense from lower debt rates was partially offset by an increase in average
debt outstanding in the second quarter of 2011 as compared to the second quarter of 2010.
The provision for income taxes was $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The
benefit for income taxes was $13.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The effective
tax rate was 93.7% and 37.3% during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Our effective tax rate normally differs from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due
to certain non-deductible permanent items, state income taxes and certain state minimum and gross
receipts taxes, which are incurred regardless of whether we earn income. Our high effective tax
rate during the three months ended June 30, 2011 is primarily
due to the impact of state gross receipts
taxes totaling $0.2 million in the second quarter of 2011 when combined with low pre-tax net income.
22
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011, Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
The following table sets forth for each of the periods indicated our statements of operations
data and expresses revenue and expense data as a percentage of total revenues for the periods
presented (in 000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 versus 2010 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment rental revenue |
|
$ |
587,471 |
|
|
$ |
481,947 |
|
|
|
84.6 |
% |
|
|
85.8 |
% |
|
$ |
105,524 |
|
|
|
21.9 |
% |
Sale of merchandise |
|
|
25,778 |
|
|
|
24,691 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
1,087 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
Sale of used rental equipment |
|
|
80,799 |
|
|
|
55,099 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
25,700 |
|
|
|
46.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
694,048 |
|
|
|
561,737 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
132,311 |
|
|
|
23.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of equipment rentals,
excluding depreciation |
|
|
306,682 |
|
|
|
271,240 |
|
|
|
44.2 |
|
|
|
48.3 |
|
|
|
35,442 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
Depreciation of rental equipment |
|
|
144,848 |
|
|
|
134,043 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
10,805 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
Cost of merchandise sales |
|
|
17,031 |
|
|
|
17,954 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
(923 |
) |
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
Cost of used rental equipment
sales |
|
|
56,755 |
|
|
|
48,568 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
8,187 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues |
|
|
525,316 |
|
|
|
471,805 |
|
|
|
75.7 |
|
|
|
84.0 |
|
|
|
53,511 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
168,732 |
|
|
|
89,932 |
|
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
78,800 |
|
|
|
87.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative |
|
|
85,201 |
|
|
|
70,719 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
14,482 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
of non-rental equipment and
intangibles |
|
|
20,916 |
|
|
|
19,967 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
Other operating gains, net |
|
|
(1,683 |
) |
|
|
(2,450 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses,
net |
|
|
104,434 |
|
|
|
88,236 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
16,198 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
64,298 |
|
|
|
1,696 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
62,602 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
128,943 |
|
|
|
98,026 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
30,917 |
|
|
|
31.5 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
15,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,342 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
(506 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(406 |
) |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before benefit for
income taxes |
|
|
(79,481 |
) |
|
|
(96,230 |
) |
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
|
|
(17.1 |
) |
|
|
16,749 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Benefit for income taxes |
|
|
29,116 |
|
|
|
36,287 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
(7,171 |
) |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(50,365 |
) |
|
$ |
(59,943 |
) |
|
|
(7.3 |
)% |
|
|
(10.7 |
)% |
|
$ |
9,578 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues increased $132.3 million, or 23.6%, from $561.7 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 to $694.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Equipment rental
revenue increased $105.5 million, or 21.9%, from $481.9 million for the six months ended June 30,
2010 to $587.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The increase in equipment rental
revenue is primarily the result of an $84.8 million, or 17.6%, increase in rental volume and a
$20.7 million, or 4.3%, increase in rental rates. The increase in rental volume is inclusive of a
$2.3 million increase due to currency rate changes.
Sale of merchandise revenues increased $1.1 million, or 4.4%, from $24.7 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 to $25.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The increase
was driven primarily by increases in parts and new equipment sales of $0.9 million and $0.4
million, respectively. The increase in parts is due primarily to an increase in rental revenue and
the increase in new equipment sales is due primarily to mix.
23
Revenues from the sale of used rental equipment increased $25.7 million, or 46.6%, from $55.1
million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to $80.8 million for the six months ended June 30,
2011. The increase was due to an approximate 31% increase in volume combined with improved pricing
in both auction and retail channels. Used equipment sales at OEC for the six months ended June 30,
2011 totaled $168.7 million and represents a normal part of the rental fleet life cycle.
Cost of equipment rentals, excluding depreciation, increased $35.4 million, or 13.1%, from
$271.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to $306.7 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2011, due primarily to the 17.6% increase in rental volume. Cost of equipment rentals
excluding depreciation, as a percentage of equipment rental revenues decreased from 56.3% for the
six months ended June 30, 2010 to 52.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 due to a 4.3%
increase in rental rates. Unlike increases in rental volume, increases in equipment rental rates
are not accompanied by an increase in cost of equipment rentals.
Depreciation of rental equipment increased $10.8 million, or 8.1%, from $134.0 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2010 to $144.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The
increase in depreciation of rental equipment was due largely to an approximate 5% increase in
average OEC. The increase in average OEC was driven by $367.3 million of rental equipment
purchases, net of $168.7 million of used equipment sales at OEC in the six months ended June 30,
2011. As a percent of equipment rental revenues, depreciation of rental equipment decreased from
27.8% in the six months ended June 30, 2010 to 24.7% in the six months ended June 30, 2011. This
decrease was due primarily to an increase in fleet utilization during the first six months of 2011
as compared to the first six months of 2010, and to a smaller extent, an increase in rental rates.
Cost of merchandise sales decreased $0.9 million, or 5.1%, from $18.0 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 to $17.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The decrease
was due primarily to a decrease in cost of non-stock sales of $0.7 million. Gross margin for
merchandise sales increased from 27.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to 33.9% for the six
months ended June 30, 2011, due primarily to margin improvements on non-stock sales. The
improvement in margins on non-stock sales was driven primarily by a change in mix.
Cost of used rental equipment sales increased $8.2 million, or 16.9%, from $48.6 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2010 to $56.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The
increase is due primarily to the 46.6% increase in sales of used rental equipment for the six
months ended June 30, 2011. Gross margin for the sale of used rental equipment increased from
11.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to 29.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The
increase was reflected in higher margins on used equipment sold through both retail and auction
channels and was driven by strengthening demand for used rental equipment.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $14.5 million, or 20.5%, from $70.7
million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to $85.2 million for the six months ended June 30,
2011. The increase is due primarily to increases in administrative and sales force wages and
benefits, travel and meeting costs and professional fees.
Administrative and sales force wages and
benefits increased $8.4 million in the 2011 versus 2010 six-month period and consisted primarily of
$4.2 million increase in sales commissions, a $2.2 million increase in variable compensation and a
$2.4 million increase in direct wages offset by a $2.0 million decrease in severance expense. The
increase in sales commission was due primarily to increase in equipment rental revenue and the sale
of used rental equipment. The increase in direct wages was due primarily to an increase in
headcount. On a combined basis, travel and meeting costs increased approximately $4.5 million and
professional fees increased $1.7 million. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased
as a percentage of total revenues from 12.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to 12.3% for
the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Depreciation and amortization of non-rental equipment and intangibles increased $0.9 million,
or 4.8%, from $20.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to $20.9 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2011. The increase is due to an increase in depreciation on non-rental
vehicles and trailers due to a larger fleet.
Other operating gains, net were $1.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and
consisted primarily of gains on the sale of non-rental delivery
vehicles and trailers. Other operating gains, net were $2.5
million in the six months ended June 30,
24
2010 and consisted primarily of proceeds received from our insurance carrier for rental equipment
and property claims attributable to hurricane damage. This gain represents proceeds in excess of
previously indemnified losses. Recoveries in excess of losses incurred are considered gain
contingencies and are not recognized until they are received.
Interest expense, net increased $30.9 million, or 31.5%, from $98.0 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 to $128.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The increase was due
to the settlement of our interest rate swaps and reverse swaps in January 2011 net of lower debt
rates on our 2021 Notes as compared to the average rate on our Second Lien Term Facility, which was
repaid in January 2011 and the rate on our 2014 Notes, which were partially repaid in February
2011. In connection with our interest rate swap settlements, we paid $35.1 million of which $33.9
million was recognized as interest expense in the three months ended March 31, 2011. The
difference of $1.2 million was recognized as interest expense in November 2009 when certain of our
interest rate swaps were de-designated as cash flow hedges.
The benefit for income taxes was $29.1 million and $36.3 million for the six months ended June
30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and resulted from a pre-tax net loss for both periods. The
effective tax rate was 36.6% and 37.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. Our effective tax rate normally differs from the federal statutory rate of 35%
primarily due to certain non-deductible permanent items, state income taxes and certain state
minimum and gross receipts taxes, which are incurred regardless of whether we earn income. Our
effective tax rate decreased due to the effect of enacted tax rate changes applied to our deferred
balances during the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows and Liquidity
Our primary source of capital is from cash generated by our rental operations including cash
received from the sale of used rental equipment, and secondarily from borrowings available under
our New Senior ABL Revolving Facility. Our business is highly capital intensive, requiring
significant investments in order to expand our rental fleet during periods of growth and smaller
investments required to maintain and replace our rental fleet during times of weakening rental
demand.
Cash flows from operating activities, as well as the sale of used rental equipment, enable us
to fund our operations and service our debt obligations including the continued repayment of our
New Senior ABL Revolving Facility. We continuously monitor utilization of our rental fleet and if
warranted we divest excess fleet, which generates additional cash flow. In addition, due to the
condition and relative age of our fleet, we have the ability to significantly reduce capital
expenditures during difficult economic times, therefore allowing us to redirect this cash towards
further debt reduction during these periods. The following table summarizes our sources and uses of
cash for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in 000s) |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
273,143 |
|
|
$ |
169,893 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(288,127 |
) |
|
|
(90,114 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
48,330 |
|
|
|
(73,770 |
) |
Effect of foreign exchange rates on cash |
|
|
907 |
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
34,253 |
|
|
$ |
6,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2011, we had cash and cash equivalents of $37.8 million, an increase of $34.3
million from December 31, 2010. Generally, we manage our cash flow by using any excess cash, after
considering our working
25
capital and capital expenditure needs, to pay down the outstanding balance of our revolving
facility. The increase in cash is due primarily to an increase in cash held at our wholly-owned
Canadian subsidiary, RSC Equipment Rental of Canada, Ltd. In December 2010, RSC Equipment Rental
of Canada, Ltd. transferred approximately $27.0 million to RSC Equipment Rental, Inc., which used
the funds to pay down our Old Senior ABL Revolving Facility. RSC Equipment Rental, Inc. repaid the
outstanding balance to RSC Equipment Rental of Canada, Ltd. in the first quarter of 2011. Refer to
the Financing Activities section below for additional information.
Operating activities Net cash provided by operating activities during the six months ended
June 30, 2011 consisted of the add-back of non-cash items and other adjustments of $133.6 million
and a decrease in operating assets (net of operating liabilities) of $189.9 million offset by a net
loss of $50.4 million. The most significant change in operating assets and liabilities was an
increase in accounts payable, which was primarily attributable to capital purchases, resulting in a
cash inflow of $191.8 million offset by an increase in accounts receivable resulting in a cash
outflow of $23.5 million.
Net cash provided by operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2010 consisted
of the add-back of non-cash items and other adjustments of $118.7 million and a decrease in
operating assets (net of operating liabilities) of $111.1 million offset by a net loss of $59.9
million. The most significant change in operating assets and liabilities was an increase in
accounts payable of $122.9 million, which was primarily attributable to capital purchases made in
the first half of 2010.
Investing activities Net cash used in investing activities during the six months ended June
30, 2011 consisted of $372.1 million of capital purchases offset by $84.0 million of proceeds
received from the sale of rental and non-rental equipment. Capital expenditures include purchases
of rental and non-rental equipment.
Net cash used in investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2010 consisted for
$148.6 million of capital purchases offset by $56.8 million of proceeds received from the sale of
rental and non-rental equipment and $1.7 million of insurance proceeds associated with rental
equipment and property claims. Capital expenditures include purchases of rental and non-rental
equipment.
The increase in net cash used in investing activities during the first six months of 2011, as
compared to the first six months of 2010, was due primarily to our changing priorities with respect
to our rental fleet. In response to growing demand for our rental equipment and rising
utilization, we purchased $367.3 million of rental fleet in the six months ended June 30, 2011 up
$220.3 million, from $147.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2010. Our sales of used rental
equipment in the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were driven by our decision to divest and
replace aging rental equipment.
Financing activities
$650.0 million Senior Unsecured Notes Offering
On January 19, 2011, we completed a private offering of $650.0 million aggregate principal
amount of 8.25% senior unsecured notes due February 2021 (the 2021 Notes). The proceeds from the
sale of the 2021 Notes were used to repay the outstanding balance on our Second Lien Term Facility,
which totaled $479.4 million plus accrued interest of $0.7 million, redeem a portion of the 2014
Notes as described below, settle our outstanding interest rate swap obligations of $35.1 million
and pay a portion of the transaction costs incurred with the issuance of the 2021 Notes. The
transaction costs, which totaled $14.6 million, were capitalized as deferred financing costs and
are being amortized as interest expense over the term of the 2021 Notes using the effective
interest rate method. On February 21, 2011, we redeemed $117.0 million of aggregate principal of
our 2014 Notes, paid accrued interest of $2.5 million on the 2014 Notes and incurred a call premium
of $5.6 million, which was funded with the remaining proceeds from the 2021 Notes and in part from
a draw on our New Senior ABL Revolving Facility. As a result of the Second Lien Term Facility
repayment and the partial repayment of the 2014 Notes, we expensed $7.3 million of unamortized
deferred financing costs, which together with the $5.6 million in call premiums, is characterized
as a loss on extinguishment of debt in the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the
six months ended
26
June 30, 2011. The settlement of our interest rate swaps resulted in a charge of $33.9 million,
which is characterized as interest expense in the condensed consolidated statement of operations
for the six months ended June 30, 2011.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we initiated and completed an exchange offer where
the holders of the 2021 Notes could exchange such unregistered notes for new, registered notes.
The terms of the new, registered notes offered in the exchange offer are identical in all material
respects to the terms of the unregistered notes, except that the new notes are registered under the
Securities Act of 1933 and do not contain restrictions on transfer.
New Senior ABL Revolving Facility
On February 9, 2011, we entered into the New Senior ABL Revolving Facility, which replaced our
Old Senior ABL Revolving Facility, and we borrowed $383.0 million of loans under our New Senior ABL
Revolving Facility. The proceeds of these loans were used to repay the outstanding balance on our
Old Senior ABL Revolving Facility, which totaled $370.2 million plus accrued interest and other
fees of $1.1 million, and to pay a portion of transaction costs including legal fees. Total
transaction costs of $12.3 million were capitalized as deferred financing costs and are being
amortized to interest expense over the term of the New Senior ABL Revolving Facility. In addition,
we wrote off $2.4 million of unamortized deferred financing costs associated with the Old Senior
ABL Revolving Facility, which is included in the loss on extinguishment of debt in the condensed
consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Our New Senior ABL
Revolving Facility, which is due February 2016, provides commitments for aggregate borrowings of
approximately $1,100.0 million subject to, among other things, our maintenance of a sufficient
borrowing base under such facility. The borrowing base reporting requirements that we are subject
to under the New Senior ABL Revolving Facility are substantially similar to those under our Old
Senior ABL Revolving Facility. Financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 include
net cash proceeds of $346.0 million on our New Senior ABL Revolving Facility and net cash payments
of $304.2 million on our Old Senior ABL Revolving Facility.
Other cash used in financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2011 includes
$14.3 million of repayments on our capital leases. Pursuant to an intercompany revolving agreement
between RSC Equipment Rental of Canada, Ltd and RSC Equipment Rental, Inc., we will periodically
transfer excess cash generated from our Canadian operations to the U.S. in order to pay down the
outstanding balance on our Senior ABL Revolving Facility. There were no outstanding intercompany
loan balances at June 30, 2011. Interest payable under the Senior ABL Revolving Facility normally
exceeds that earned under an interest bearing cash account.
Net cash used in financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2010 consists
primarily of $57.0 million net payments on our Old Senior ABL Revolving Facility. We also repaid
$16.0 million on our capital lease obligations.
Indebtedness
We are highly leveraged and a substantial portion of our liquidity needs arise from debt
service requirements and from funding our costs of operations and capital expenditures. As of June
30, 2011, we had $2.2 billion of indebtedness outstanding, consisting of $346.0 million under the
New Senior ABL Revolving Facility, $503.0 million of 2014 Notes, $400.0 million of 2017 Notes,
$200.0 million of 2019 Notes, $650.0 million of 2021 Notes and $81.0 million under capital lease
obligations. The 2017 Notes and the 2019 Notes are presented net of unamortized original issue
discounts of $8.8 million and $2.8 million, respectively, in our condensed consolidated balance
sheet at June 30, 2011.
As of June 30, 2011, we had an outstanding balance of $346.0 million on our New Senior ABL
Revolving Facility leaving $641.1 million available for future borrowings. The available
borrowings of $641.1 million are net of outstanding letters of credit.
27
Substantially all of our rental equipment and all our other assets are subject to liens under
our New Senior ABL Revolving Facility and our 2017 Notes, and none of such assets are available to
satisfy the general claims of our creditors.
The New Senior ABL Revolving Facility contains a number of covenants that, among other things,
limit or restrict RSCs ability to incur additional indebtedness; provide guarantees; engage in
mergers, acquisitions or dispositions; enter into sale-leaseback transactions; make dividends and
other restricted payments; prepay other indebtedness; engage in certain transactions with
affiliates; make investments; change the nature of its business; incur liens; with respect to RSC
Holdings II, LLC, take actions other than those enumerated; and amend specified debt agreements.
The respective indentures governing the Notes also contain restrictive covenants that, among other
things, limit RSCs ability to incur additional debt; pay dividends or distributions on our
capital stock or repurchase our capital stock; make certain investments; create liens to secure
debt; enter into certain transactions with affiliates; create limitations on the ability of our
restricted subsidiaries to make dividends or distributions to their parents; merge or consolidate
with another company; and transfer and sell assets. In addition, under the New Senior ABL Revolving
Facility, upon excess availability falling below $100.0 million, we will become subject to more
frequent borrowing base reporting requirements and upon the excess availability falling below the
greater of $125.0 million and 12.5% of the sum of the total commitments under the New Senior ABL
Revolving Facility, the borrowers will be required to comply with specified financial ratios,
including a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.00 to 1.00 and a maximum leverage ratio as of
the last day of each quarter of 5.25 to 1.00, decreasing to 5.00 to 1.00 on December 31, 2011.
As of June 30, 2011, excess availability on our New Senior ABL Revolving Facility was $641.1
million and we were therefore not required to comply with either the fixed charge coverage ratio or
leverage ratio. Had excess availability fallen below the greater of $125.0 million and 12.5% of
the sum of the total commitments under the New Senior ABL Revolving Facility as of June 30, 2011,
compliance with these financial ratios would have been required and we would have violated the
minimum fixed charge coverage ratio requirement, which would be an event of default. We do not
expect excess availability to fall below the greater of $125.0 million and 12.5% of the sum of the
total commitments under the New Senior ABL Revolving Facility at any time during the next twelve
months and therefore do not expect that we will be required to comply with the specified financial
ratios during that time. If an event of default occurred, we would seek a waiver of the covenants
and could incur upfront fees and increased interest costs. However, there can be no assurances
that such a waiver could be obtained.
Outlook
We believe that cash generated from operations, together with amounts available under the New
Senior ABL Revolving Facility, will be adequate to permit us to meet our debt service obligations,
ongoing costs of operations, working capital needs and capital expenditure requirements for at
least the next twelve months and the foreseeable future. Our future financial and operating
performance, ability to service or refinance our debt and ability to comply with covenants and
restrictions contained in our debt agreements will be subject to future economic conditions and to
financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. See Cautionary Note
for Forward-Looking Statements on page 1 and Risk Factors in Part II, Item 1A of this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q.
From time to time, we evaluate various alternatives for the use of excess cash generated from
our operations including paying down debt, funding acquisitions and repurchasing common stock or
debt securities. Unless certain payment conditions are satisfied, the New Senior ABL Revolving
Facility limits our capacity to repurchase common stock, make cash dividends or make optional
payments on unsecured debt securities. This limitation at June 30, 2011 was $100.0 million.
Adjusted EBITDA
As a supplement to the financial statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which are
prepared in accordance with GAAP, we also present Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is generally
consolidated net income (loss) before net interest expense, income taxes and depreciation and
amortization and before certain other
28
items, including loss on extinguishment of debt, share-based compensation and other (income)
expense, net. We present Adjusted EBITDA because we believe the calculation is useful to investors
in evaluating our financial performance and as a liquidity measure. Adjusted EBITDA is not a
measure of performance calculated in accordance with GAAP and there are material limitations to its
usefulness on a stand alone basis. Adjusted EBITDA does not include reductions for cash payments
for our obligations to service our debt, fund our working capital and pay our income taxes. In
addition, certain items excluded from Adjusted EBTIDA such as interest, income taxes, depreciation
and amortization are significant components in understanding and assessing our financial
performance. All companies do not calculate Adjusted EBITDA in the same manner and our
presentation may not be comparable to those presented by other companies. Investors should use
Adjusted EBITDA in addition to, and not as an alternative to, net income (loss) or net cash
provided by operating activities as defined under GAAP.
The table below provides a reconciliation between net income (loss), as determined in
accordance with GAAP, and Adjusted EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in 000s) |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
(22,115 |
) |
|
$ |
(50,365 |
) |
|
$ |
(59,943 |
) |
Depreciation of rental equipment
and depreciation and amortization
of non-rental equipment and
intangibles |
|
|
84,650 |
|
|
|
77,308 |
|
|
|
165,764 |
|
|
|
154,010 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
46,984 |
|
|
|
48,233 |
|
|
|
128,943 |
|
|
|
98,026 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
(13,156 |
) |
|
|
(29,116 |
) |
|
|
(36,287 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
132,698 |
|
|
$ |
90,270 |
|
|
$ |
215,226 |
|
|
$ |
155,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
1,894 |
|
|
|
1,595 |
|
|
|
3,168 |
|
|
|
2,258 |
|
Other (income) expense, net |
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
(506 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
134,423 |
|
|
$ |
91,964 |
|
|
$ |
233,230 |
|
|
$ |
157,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below provides a reconciliation between net cash provided by operating activities,
as determined in accordance with GAAP, and Adjusted EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in 000s) |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
213,959 |
|
|
$ |
104,412 |
|
|
$ |
273,143 |
|
|
$ |
169,893 |
|
Gain on sales of rental and non-rental property
and equipment, net of non-cash write-offs |
|
|
13,209 |
|
|
|
2,717 |
|
|
|
25,250 |
|
|
|
5,325 |
|
Gain on settlement of insurance property claims |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,736 |
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
|
37,304 |
|
|
|
56,523 |
|
|
|
107,609 |
|
|
|
93,354 |
|
Cash paid (received) for taxes, net |
|
|
2,556 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
2,490 |
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
Other (income) expense, net |
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
(506 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities |
|
|
(132,436 |
) |
|
|
(72,120 |
) |
|
|
(174,756 |
) |
|
|
(112,171 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
134,423 |
|
|
$ |
91,964 |
|
|
$ |
233,230 |
|
|
$ |
157,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free Cash Flow
We also present free cash flow as a supplement to the financial statements. We define free
cash flow as net cash provided by operating activities and net capital inflows (expenditures). All
companies do not calculate free cash flow in the same manner, and our presentation may not be
comparable to those presented by other companies. We believe free cash flow provides useful
additional information concerning cash flow available to meet future debt service obligations and
working capital needs. However, free cash flow is a non-GAAP measure in addition to, and not as an
alternative to, net income (loss) or net cash provided by operating activities as defined under
GAAP.
29
Moreover, free cash flow does not represent remaining cash flows available for discretionary
expenditures because the measure does not deduct payment required for debt maturities.
The table below reconciles free cash flow, a non-GAAP measure, to net cash provided by
operating activities, which is the most directly comparable financial measure determined in
accordance with GAAP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(in 000s) |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
213,959 |
|
|
$ |
104,412 |
|
|
$ |
273,143 |
|
|
$ |
169,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of rental equipment |
|
|
(209,426 |
) |
|
|
(102,060 |
) |
|
|
(367,347 |
) |
|
|
(146,966 |
) |
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(2,339 |
) |
|
|
(1,304 |
) |
|
|
(4,783 |
) |
|
|
(1,635 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of rental equipment |
|
|
38,306 |
|
|
|
27,993 |
|
|
|
80,799 |
|
|
|
55,099 |
|
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment |
|
|
1,610 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
3,204 |
|
|
|
1,652 |
|
Insurance proceeds from rental equipment and
property claims |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net capital expenditures |
|
|
(171,849 |
) |
|
|
(75,015 |
) |
|
|
(288,127 |
) |
|
|
(90,114 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow |
|
$ |
42,110 |
|
|
$ |
29,397 |
|
|
$ |
(14,984 |
) |
|
$ |
79,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based upon
our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance
with GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and
judgments that affect the reported amounts in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes. Actual results, however, may materially differ from our
calculated estimates and this difference would be reported in our current operations. We have made
no significant changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates since December 31, 2010.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the FASB) issued an amendment to the
existing guidance on the presentation of comprehensive income. Under the amended guidance,
entities have the option to present the components of net income and other comprehensive income in
either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive
statements. Entities no longer have the option of presenting the components of other comprehensive
income within the statement of changes in stockholders equity. For public entities, the amendment
is effective on a retrospective basis for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years,
beginning after December 15, 2011, which for us is the first quarter in 2012. The adoption of this
amendment will result in a change to our current presentation of comprehensive income.
In May 2011, the FASB issued amendments to the existing guidance on fair value measurement.
The amendments are intended to create consistency between U.S. generally accepted accounting
standards and International Financial Reporting Standards on measuring fair value and disclosing
information about fair value measurements. The amendments clarify the application of existing fair
value measurement requirements including (i) the application of the highest and best use valuation
premise concepts, (ii) measuring the fair value of an instrument classified in a reporting entitys
shareholders equity, and (iii) quantitative information required for fair value measurements
categorized within Level 3. In addition, the amendments require additional disclosure for Level 3
measurements regarding the sensitivity of fair value to changes in unobservable inputs and any
interrelationships between those inputs. For public entities, the amendments are effective for
interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, which for us is calendar year 2012.
These changes are required to be applied prospectively. We do not anticipate that the adoption of
these amendments will have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
30
In December 2010, the FASB issued an update to the existing guidance for goodwill and other
intangible assets. The update modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units
with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to
perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if there are qualitative factors indicating that it
is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. The qualitative factors are consistent
with the existing guidance which requires goodwill of a reporting unit to be tested for impairment
between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not
reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. This guidance is effective
for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010, which
for us is the fourth quarter of 2011. We do not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will
have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
In November 2010, the FASB issued an update to its existing guidance on business combinations.
This guidance requires a public entity that presents comparative financial statements to present
in its pro forma disclosure the revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business
combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the prior
annual reporting period. In addition, this guidance expands the supplemental pro forma disclosures
to include a description of the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments
directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and
earnings. The guidance is effective prospectively for business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period on or after
December 15, 2010, which for us is calendar year 2011. The guidance did not have an impact on our
disclosures for the six months ended June 30, 2011.
31
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We are exposed to market risk associated with changes in interest rates and foreign currency
exchange rates.
Interest Rate Risk
As of June 30, 2011 we have a significant amount of debt under the New Senior ABL Revolving
Facility, with variable rates of interest based generally on adjusted London inter-bank offered
rate (LIBOR), or an alternate interest rate, in each case, plus an applicable margin (or, in the
case of Canadian dollar borrowings under the New Senior ABL Revolving Facility, variable borrowing
costs based generally on bankers acceptance discount rates, plus a stamping fee equal to an
applicable margin, or on the Canadian prime rate, plus an applicable margin). We also had $479.4
million of variable rate debt under the Second Lien Term Facility, which was repaid in January
2011. Increases in interest rates could therefore significantly increase the associated interest
payments that we are required to make on this debt. We have assessed our exposure to changes in
interest rates by analyzing the sensitivity to our earnings assuming various changes in market
interest rates. Assuming a hypothetical increase of 1% in interest rates on the variable rate debt
in our debt portfolio as of June 30, 2011, our net interest expense for the six months ended June
30, 2011 would have increased by an estimated $2.1 million.
To hedge exposure to market conditions, reduce the volatility of financing costs and achieve a
desired balance between fixed-rate and floating-rate debt, we have utilized interest rate swaps
under which we have exchanged floating-rate interest payments for fixed-rate interest payments. In
January 2011, in conjunction with the financing activities previously discussed, all outstanding
swaps were settled. As of June 30, 2011, no interest rate swaps are outstanding.
As of June 30, 2011, 80.3% of our $2,168.4 million of debt had fixed rate interest.
Currency Exchange Risk
The functional currency for our Canadian operations is the Canadian dollar. In the six months
ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, 6.9% and 6.2%, respectively , of our revenues were generated
by our Canadian operations. As a result, our future earnings could be affected by fluctuations in
the exchange rate between the U.S. and Canadian dollars. Based upon the level of our Canadian
operations during the six months ended June 30, 2011, relative to our operations as a whole, a 10%
increase in the value of the Canadian dollar as compared to the U.S. dollar would have reduced net
loss by approximately $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in company reports filed or submitted under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and
Exchange Commission, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
An evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures was performed
under the supervision of, and with the participation of, management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
32
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
An evaluation of our internal controls over financial reporting was performed under the
supervision of, and with the participation of, management, including our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, to determine whether any changes have occurred during the period
covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Based upon this
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that no changes in
our internal control over financial reporting have occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2011
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
PART II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We are party to legal proceedings and potential claims arising in the ordinary course of our
business, including claims related to employment matters, contractual disputes, personal injuries
and property damage. In addition, various legal actions, claims and governmental inquiries and
proceedings are pending or may be instituted or asserted in the future against us and our
subsidiaries.
Litigation is subject to many uncertainties, and the outcome of the individual litigated
matters is not predictable with assurance. It is possible that certain of the actions, claims,
inquiries or proceedings, including those discussed above, could be decided unfavorably to us or
any of our subsidiaries involved. Although we cannot predict with certainty the ultimate resolution
of lawsuits, investigations and claims asserted against us, we do not believe that any currently
pending legal proceedings to which we are a party will have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, you
should carefully consider the factors discussed in Risk Factors in our 2010 Form 10-K filed with
the SEC on February 10, 2011, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or
future results. The risks described in our 2010 Form 10-K are not the only risks we face.
Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be
immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or future
results.
There have been no material changes in the risk factors previously disclosed in Risk Factors
in Part 1, Item 1A of our 2010 Form 10-K filed with the SEC.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Reserved
Item 5. Other Information
None.
33
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated By Reference |
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filed |
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filing Date |
|
Herewith |
31.1
|
|
Certification of
Chief Executive
Officer as required
by Rule 13a-14(a)
of the Securities
Exchange Act of
1934, as amended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of
Chief Financial
Officer as required
by Rule 13a-14(a)
of the Securities
Exchange Act of
1934, as amended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1*
|
|
Certifications of
Chief Executive
Officer and Chief
Financial Officer
as required by Rule
13a-14(b) of the
Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as
amended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101**
|
|
The following
financial
information from
our Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q
for the period
ended June 30,
2011, filed with
the SEC on July 21,
2011, formatted in
Extensible Business
Reporting Language
(XBRL): (i) the
Condensed
Consolidated
Balance Sheets at
June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010,
(ii) the Condensed
Consolidated
Statements of
Operations for the
three and six
months ended June
30, 2011 and
June 30, 2010,
(iii) the Condensed
Consolidated
Statements of Cash
Flows for the six
months ended June
30, 2011 and June
30, 2010, and (iv)
the Notes to
Condensed
Consolidated
Financial
Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
* |
|
The certifications attached as Exhibit 32.1 that accompany this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q,
are not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of RSC Holdings Inc., under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q, irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.
|
** |
|
The XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not
be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or
otherwise subject to liability of that section and shall not be incorporated by reference into any
filing or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as shall be
expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing or document. |
34
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
RSC Holdings Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Erik Olsson
Erik Olsson
|
|
President,
Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
July 21, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Patricia D. Chiodo
Patricia D. Chiodo
|
|
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Principal
Accounting Officer)
|
|
July 21, 2011 |
35
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated By Reference |
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filed |
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filing Date |
|
Herewith |
31.1
|
|
Certification of
Chief Executive
Officer as required
by Rule 13a-14(a)
of the Securities
Exchange Act of
1934, as amended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of
Chief Financial
Officer as required
by Rule 13a-14(a)
of the Securities
Exchange Act of
1934, as amended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1*
|
|
Certifications of
Chief Executive
Officer and Chief
Financial Officer
as required by Rule
13a-14(b) of the
Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as
amended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101**
|
|
The following
financial
information from
our Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q
for the period
ended June 30,
2011, filed with
the SEC on July 21,
2011, formatted in
Extensible Business
Reporting Language
(XBRL): (i) the
Condensed
Consolidated
Balance Sheets at
June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010,
(ii) the Condensed
Consolidated
Statements of
Operations for the
three and six
months ended June
30, 2011 and
June 30, 2010,
(iii) the Condensed
Consolidated
Statements of Cash
Flows for the six
months ended June
30, 2011 and June
30, 2010, and (iv)
the Notes to
Condensed
Consolidated
Financial
Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
* |
|
The certifications attached as Exhibit 32.1 that accompany this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q,
are not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of RSC Holdings Inc., under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q, irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.
|
** |
|
The XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not
be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or
otherwise subject to liability of that section and shall not be incorporated by reference into any
filing or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as shall be
expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing or document. |
36