UNITED STATES |
|||
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
|||
Washington, D.C. 20549 |
|||
|
|||
SCHEDULE 14A |
|||
|
|||
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of |
|||
|
|||
Filed by the Registrant ý |
|||
|
|||
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o |
|||
|
|||
Check the appropriate box: |
|||
o |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
||
o |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
||
ý |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
||
o |
Definitive Additional Materials |
||
o |
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
||
|
|||
HYPERFEED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. |
|||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) |
|||
|
|||
|
|||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) |
|||
|
|||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
|||
ý |
No fee required. |
||
o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
||
|
(1) |
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
(2) |
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
(3) |
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
(4) |
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
(5) |
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
o |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
||
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
||
|
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Pluschkell
President and Chief Executive Officer
Dear Stockholder:
I am pleased to invite you to the annual meeting of stockholders of HyperFeed Technologies, Inc. to be held on Friday, August 4, 2006 at 1:00 p.m., local time, at the Museum of Contemporary Art, The Coast Room, 700 Prospect Street, La Jolla, California.
In addition to the formal items of business, I will be available at the meeting to answer your questions. This booklet includes the notice of annual meeting and the proxy statement. The proxy statement describes the business that we will conduct at the meeting and provides information about HyperFeed Technologies, Inc.
Please note that only stockholders of record at the close of business on June 6, 2006, may vote at the meeting. Your vote is important to us and to our business. Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting, please complete, date, sign, and return the enclosed proxy card promptly. If you attend the meeting and prefer to vote in person, you may do so.
We look forward to seeing you at the meeting.
Very truly yours,
PAUL PLUSCHKELL
June 23,2006
HyperFeed Technologies, Inc.
300 SOUTH WACKER DRIVE, SUITE 300
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60606
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING
OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON
August 4, 2006
TO THE STOCKHOLDERS OF
HYPERFEED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Our annual meeting of stockholders will be held on Friday, August 4, 2006 at 1:00 p.m., local time, at the Museum of Contemporary Art, The Coast Room, 700 Prospect Street, La Jolla, California, for the following purposes:
1. To elect five (5) members to our Board of Directors.
2. To approve the HyperFeed Technologies, Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
3. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement.
Only holders of record of our common stock at the close of business on June 6, 2006, will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, our annual meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. A list of stockholders entitled to vote will be kept at HyperFeed at 300 South Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60606, for ten days before the meeting and will be available at the place of the annual meeting.
By order of the Board of Directors
GEMMA LAHERA
Principal Accounting Officer
and Treasurer
Chicago, Illinois
June 23,2006
HyperFeed Technologies, Inc.
300 SOUTH WACKER DRIVE, SUITE 300
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60606
PROXY STATEMENT
The enclosed proxy is solicited by HyperFeed Technologies, Inc. (HyperFeed, the Company, or we) for use at the annual meeting of our stockholders, to be held on Friday, August 4, 2006 at 1:00 p.m., local time, at the Museum of Contemporary Art, The Coast Room, 700 Prospect Street, La Jolla, California. In addition to solicitation of proxies by mail, proxies may be solicited by our directors, officers and regular employees by personal interview, telephone or telegram, and we will request brokers and other fiduciaries to forward proxy soliciting material to the beneficial owners of shares which are held of record by them. We will pay the expense of all such solicitation, including printing and mailing. Any proxy may be revoked at any time before its exercise, by written notice to our Secretary or by attending the meeting and electing to vote in person. This Proxy Statement and the accompanying proxy were initially mailed to stockholders on or about June 23, 2006.
Only holders of record of our common stock at the close of business on June 6, 2006 will be entitled to vote at the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. As of April 6, 2006, 7,643,474 shares of our common stock were outstanding.
Each share of our common stock that you own entitles you to one vote. Holders of shares of our voting stock are not entitled to cumulate their votes in the election of our Board of Directors (the Board). A majority of the outstanding shares of our voting stock present in person or by proxy at the annual meeting shall constitute a quorum at the meeting. Votes cast by proxy or in person at the annual meeting will be tabulated by the inspector of election appointed for the meeting who will also determine whether or not a quorum is present. In determining whether a quorum exists at the meeting for purposes of the election of directors, the inspector of election will treat valid proxies marked abstain or proxies required to be treated as broker non-votes as present. In determining whether a quorum exists at the meeting for purposes of all other matters, the inspector of election will not treat valid proxies marked abstain or proxies required to be treated as broker non-votes as present. A broker non-vote occurs when a broker or nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner votes on one proposal, but does not vote on another proposal because the broker nominee does not have discretionary voting power and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares. Abstentions with respect to any matter will have the same effect as a vote against that proposal while broker non-votes will have no effect.
The directors nominated shall be elected by a plurality of the votes cast at the annual meeting. This means that the director nominees with the most affirmative votes are elected to fill the available seats. Approval of proposals other than the election of directors requires the affirmative vote of a majority of our outstanding common stock present in person or by proxy at the annual meeting.
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
The Board currently is composed of five (5) directors.
Our directors are elected or appointed to serve until the next annual meeting, or until their successors are elected and shall have qualified. There are five (5) nominees for election as directors at this annual meeting. All nominees have served as directors since our last annual meeting. Each of the nominees for election as directors was recommended by a security holder.
The proxies returned pursuant to this solicitation will be voted by the persons named therein for the election as directors of the persons named below, which persons constitute the Boards nominees for election of directors. If any nominee is unable to accept the office of director (which is not presently anticipated), the persons named in the proxies will vote for the election of such other persons as they shall determine. The Board recommends that you vote in favor of electing the five (5) nominees.
Information concerning each of the nominees follows:
Name and Principal Occupation |
|
Age |
|
Director |
Ronald Langley, |
|
62 |
|
1995 |
|
|
|
|
|
John R. Hart, |
|
46 |
|
1997 |
|
|
|
|
|
Kenneth J. Slepicka, |
|
50 |
|
1998 |
|
|
|
|
|
Louis J. Morgan, |
|
69 |
|
1980 |
1
Name and Principal Occupation |
|
Age |
|
Director |
Carlos C. Campbell, |
|
68 |
|
2005 |
Messrs. Slepicka, Morgan, and Campbell are independent within the meaning of NASD listing standards.
The Board has established an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, and a Nominating Committee.
The Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities. The Board adopted a written charter of the Audit Committee in May 2000. The Audit Committee is responsible for, among other things, monitoring HyperFeeds financial reporting process and systems of internal controls regarding finance, accounting and legal compliance. Only outside directors who are not employees of HyperFeed may serve on the Audit Committee, and all members of the Audit Committee are independent within the meaning of NASD listing standards and Rule 10a-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Audit Committee is comprised of Messrs. Slepicka, Morgan, and Campbell. General Borling was also a member of the Audit Committee through May 2005 at which time General Borling resigned as a director. Mr. Slepicka is deemed to be an Audit Committee financial expert within the meaning of Rule 10a-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
The Audit Committee met seven times in 2005.
The Compensation Committee administers the Companys stock option plans, including the review and grant of stock options to officers and other employees under the Companys stock option plans. The Compensation Committee also reviews and approves various other Company compensation policies and matters, and reviews and approves the salary and other matters relating to compensation of the chief executive officer of the Company. The Compensation Committee is comprised of three members, Messrs Langley, Hart, and Slepicka. Mr. Slepicka is independent within the meaning of NASD listing standards.
The Compensation Committee met one time in 2005.
The Nominating Committee makes recommendations to the Board regarding the size and composition of the Board. The Nominating Committee establishes procedures for the nomination process, recommends candidates for election to the Board of Directors and nominates officers for election by the Board. The Nominating Committee is comprised of Messrs. Hart and Slepicka. General Borling was also a member of the Nominating Committee through May 2005 at which time General Borling resigned as a director. Mr. Slepicka is independent within the meaning of NASD listing standards.
The Nominating Committee does not have a charter nor does the Nominating Committee have a policy with regard to the consideration of any director candidates recommended by security holders. The Board of Directors believes that, in light of the Companys status as a controlled subsidiary of PICO Holdings, Inc. (PICO), it is appropriate for the Nominating Committee to function without a charter or policy with regard to the consideration of any director candidates recommended by security holders.
When the need for a new director arises (whether because of a newly created Board seat or vacancy), the Nominating Committee proceeds by whatever means it deems appropriate to identify a qualified candidate or candidates, including referrals from other directors or management. The committee reviews the qualifications of each candidate, in light of the current composition of the Board, and considers the relative qualifications of any other candidates. Final candidates are generally interviewed by one or more Board members. The committee then makes a recommendation to the Board based on its review, the results of interviews with the candidate, and all other available information. The Board makes the final decision on whether to nominate any particular candidate to the Board.
The Nominating Committee met once in 2005.
During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Board held four meetings. No director attended less than 75% of all the meetings of the Board and the committees on which he served in 2005.
2
Any stockholder who wishes to communicate directly with our Board of Directors may do so by writing to HyperFeed Board of Directors, c/o Corporate Secretary, 300 South Wacker Dr., Suite 300, Chicago IL 60606. The Corporate Secretary will provide all such communications to the Board of Directors on a confidential basis as soon as reasonably practicable following receipt.
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all of the Companys employees, including the Companys principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer. A copy of the Code of Ethics is available on the Companys corporate Web site, which is located at www.hyperfeed.com. The Company also intends to disclose any amendments to, or waivers from, the Code of Ethics on its corporate Web site.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Messrs. Langley, Hart, and Slepicka are members of the Compensation Committee. None of these directors are employees or former employees of HyperFeed. None of the members of the Compensation Committee serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers who serve on our Board or Compensation Committee.
Compensation of Directors
On January 1, 2005, we adopted a policy of paying our non-employee directors a retainer fee of $15,000 per year and, in addition, $1,000 per Board meeting, plus travel expenses. Additionally, we adopted a policy of paying Committee members $750 per meeting, plus travel expenses. Also effective January 1, 2005, the Chairman of the Audit Committee will receive a retainer fee of $2,000 per year. Mr. Slepicka received $22,000, General Borling received $17,466, Mr. Morgan received $18,500, and Mr. Campbell received $6,500 for meeting attendance fees and retainers during 2005. Messrs. Hart and Langley each have beneficial ownership of 25.2% of PICOs shares; however, Messrs. Hart and Langley each disclaim beneficial ownership of the 3,333,333 PICO shares owned by PICO Equity Investors, L. P., pursuant to Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Therefore, the Company pays meeting attendance fees and retainers for Messrs. Hart and Langley to PICO. Payments accrued for meeting attendance fees and retainers for Messrs. Hart and Langley during 2005 were not paid in 2005 but are expected to be paid in 2006.
On March 24, 1999, we adopted a policy of granting options to non-employee directors. No non-employee directors received an option grant in 2005.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES LISTED IN PROPOSAL 1. THE PERSONS NAMED ON THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD INTEND TO VOTE THE PROXIES SOLICITED HEREBY FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES UNLESS SPECIFICALLY DIRECTED OTHERWISE ON SUCH PROXY CARD.
PROPOSAL 2: APPROVAL OF THE HYPERFEED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 2005 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
At the annual meeting, the stockholders will be asked to approve the HyperFeed Technologies, Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the 2005 Incentive Plan). The Companys Board of Directors approved the 2005 Incentive Plan on November 4, 2005, subject to approval by the shareholders.
Summary of the 2005 Incentive Plan
The following summary of the 2005 Incentive Plan is qualified in its entirety by the specific language of the 2005 Incentive Plan, a copy of which is attached as Appendix A.
3
General
The purpose of the 2005 Incentive Plan is to advance the interests of the Company and its shareholders by providing a variety of incentives for employees, officers, consultants, and non-employee Directors to increase shareholders equity and provide a mechanism whereby the participants in the 2005 Incentive Plan will be able to participate in an increase in share price. The 2005 Incentive Plan seeks to achieve this by providing for grants in the form of stock options, stock-settled stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, performance shares, performance units, restricted stock units, deferred compensation awards, and other forms of stock-based awards, although it is not anticipated that all these forms of awards will be granted simultaneously.
Shares Subject to 2005 Incentive Plan
The maximum aggregate number of shares of the Companys stock that may be issued under the 2005 Incentive Plan is 646,120 and shall consist of authorized but unissued shares. Appropriate adjustments will be made to the number of shares that may be issued under the 2005 Incentive Plan, and to any outstanding awards, in the event of a stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, or similar change in the Companys capital structure. If an outstanding award for any reason expires or is canceled or terminated without having been exercised or settled in full, the shares of stock allocable to the expired, canceled, or terminated award shall again be available for issuance under the 2005 Incentive Plan.
Administration
The 2005 Incentive Plan will be administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Subject to the provisions of the 2005 Incentive Plan, the Committee will determine in its discretion the persons to whom and the times at which awards under the 2005 Incentive Plan will be granted, the number of any awards, and all of the terms and conditions of any awards. The Committee will have the authority to interpret the 2005 Incentive Plan and any such interpretation by the Committee will be binding.
Features of 2005 Incentive Plan
(1) |
The 2005 Incentive Plan shall continue in effect until the earlier of: (i) its termination by the Board of Directors; or (ii) the date on which all shares of stock available for issuance under the 2005 Incentive Plan have been issued and all restrictions on such shares under the grant of any awards have lapsed. Incentive Stock Options cannot be granted later than ten (10) years from the date of shareholder approval of the Plan. In addition, all other awards must be granted, if at all, within ten (10) years from the date of shareholder approval of the Plan. |
|
|
(2) |
The Board may amend or terminate the Plan at any time. However, without the approval of the Companys shareholders there can be: (i) no increase in the maximum aggregate number of shares that may be issued under the Plan (except for adjustments for stock splits, recapitalizations, etc.); and (ii) no other amendment of the 2005 Incentive Plan that would require approval of the Companys shareholders under any applicable law or regulation. |
|
|
(3) |
The vesting of all awards granted by the Committee shall be determined at the time of grant by the Committee. However, Deferred Compensation Awards are not subject to a vesting schedule. |
Forms of Awards
On November 4, 2005, the Board of Directors granted freestanding, stock-settled stock appreciation rights for 335,494 shares of the Companys common stock at an exercise price of $1.75 per share to certain employees of the Company under the 2005 Incentive Plan, if said 2005 Incentive Plan is approved by the Companys shareholders.
The following forms of awards may be made to officers, employees, consultants, and non-employee Directors by the Committee:
(1) |
Stock Options. Stock options are the right to purchase shares of the Company at a stated price for a specified period of time. The Committee may grant awards in the form of Incentive Stock Options or Nonstatutory Stock Options. The exercise price for all Stock Options shall be established in the discretion of the Committee. However, the exercise |
4
|
price per share cannot be lower than the fair market value of the Companys stock on the date the award is made. In the case of an award of Incentive Stock Options to a participant who owns 10% or more of the Companys stock, the exercise price per share cannot be less than 110% of the Companys fair market value of the Companys stock on the date the award is made. Within those limitations, the Committee, in its discretion, will establish the terms and conditions for Stock Options awarded as to exercise price per share, number, and term. Incentive Stock Options awarded to a 10% owner of the Companys shares expire not later than five years after the award is effective. |
|
|
(2) |
Stock-Settled Stock Appreciation Rights. The Committee may award stock appreciation rights, which may be granted in tandem with a stock option or may be granted independently of an option. Upon receiving an award, the participant will have the right to receive payment in shares of the Companys stock in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the Companys stock on the date of exercise over the exercise price. |
|
|
(3) |
Restricted Stock. A Restricted Stock award is the right to receive a share of the Companys stock on a date determined by the Committee, subject to performance goals established by the Committee in its discretion. |
|
|
(4) |
Performance Awards. The Committee in its discretion may grant Performance Awards, which represent the right to receive a cash payment. The initial value of a performance award shall be equal to the fair market value of the Companys stock on the date the award is made. The final value shall be determined based on the performance award formula established by the Committee. |
|
|
(5) |
Deferred Compensation Awards. These can be awarded to participants by the Committee in the form of Restricted Stock Units. Before awards can be granted, the Committee must establish a program for highly compensated employees selected in the Committees discretion, whereby these employees will receive Restricted Stock Units in lieu of cash compensation, stock otherwise issuable to the employee upon exercise of a Stock Option or the exercise of a SAR, or cash or shares of stock otherwise issuable to the employee when a Performance Award is settled. |
|
|
(6) |
Other Stock-Based Awards. In addition, the Committee, in its sole discretion, may carry out the purpose of this 2005 Incentive Plan by granting Stock-Based Awards as it determines to be in the best interests of the Company and subject to terms and conditions the Committee considers necessary and appropriate. |
New Plan Benefits
HyperFeed Technologies, Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan
Name and position |
|
Dollar Value ($ ) |
|
Number of Units |
|
Paul Pluschkell, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
459,071 |
|
262,326 |
|
Tom Wojciechowski, Executive Vice President of Sales |
|
126,835 |
|
72,477 |
|
Randall J. Frapart, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
1,209 |
|
691 |
|
Summary of U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following summary is intended only as a general guide as to the U.S. federal income tax consequences under current law of participation in the 2005 Incentive Plan and does not attempt to describe all possible federal or other tax consequences of such participation or tax consequences based on particular circumstances.
Under the Code, as presently in effect, the grant of an option or SAR or the award of restricted stock under the 2005 Incentive Plan will not generate income to a participant or a deduction to the Company.
Upon exercise of a nonstatutory option or SAR, the participant will normally recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the difference between the exercise price for the option and the fair market value of the Companys common stock on the exercise date or, in the case of a SAR, equal to the amount of payment received from the Company (less any exercise price, if applicable). The Company will be entitled to a tax deduction in the same amount as is recognized by the participant and at the same time, provided the Company includes and reports such amounts on a timely filed Form W-2 or Form 1099-MISC (or similar such IRS from filing). Upon a disposition of shares acquired upon exercise of a nonstatutory option, any amount received in excess of the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise of the option generally
5
will be treated as long-term or short-term capital gain, depending on the holding period of the shares. The Company will not be entitled to any tax deduction upon such subsequent disposition.
In the case of incentive options, the participant generally does not recognize any ordinary income on the date of grant or exercise. If the participant holds the stock acquired through exercise of an incentive option for one year from the date of exercise and two years from the date of grant, the participant will thereafter recognize long-term capital gain or loss upon a subsequent sale of the stock, based on the difference between the incentive options exercise price and the sale price. If the stock is sold before the requisite holding period, the participant will recognize ordinary income based upon the difference between the exercise price and the lesser of the sales price or the fair market value upon the date of exercise. The Company generally will be allowed a business expense deduction only if, and to the extent, the participant recognizes ordinary income.
For awards of restricted stock, the fair market value of the stock is not taxable to the participant as ordinary income until the year the participants interest is freely transferable or no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. Section 83(b) of the Code, however, permits a participant to elect to have the fair market value of the stock taxed as ordinary income in the year the award is received. Dividends on restricted stock are treated as ordinary income at the time paid. The Company generally will be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount of ordinary income recognized by the participant.
Upon the grant of a performance award, the participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the amount of the award, which amount will be includable in the participants taxable income in the year such performance award is paid. The Company will be entitled to a deduction in the same year equal to the amount of the award.
Vote Required and Board of Directors Recommendation
Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares voted at the annual meeting, either in person or by proxy. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against that proposal while broker non-votes will have no effect.
The Board of Directors believes that adoption of the proposed HyperFeed Technologies, Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders for the reasons stated above. THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR PROPOSAL 2 TO APPROVE THE HYPERFEED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 2005 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN. THE PERSONS NAMED ON THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD INTEND TO VOTE THE PROXIES SOLICITED HEREBY FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE HYPERFEED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 2005 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN UNLESS SPECIFICALLY DIRECTED OTHERWISE ON SUCH PROXY CARD.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The table below sets forth certain information as of April 6, 2006 with respect to our current executive officers.
Name |
|
Position |
|
Age |
Paul Pluschkell (1) |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
41 |
Tom Wojciechowski (2) |
|
Executive Vice President of Sales |
|
46 |
Gemma Lahera (3) |
|
Principal Accounting Officer and Treasurer |
|
36 |
(1) President and Chief Executive Officer since January 2004 and President since August 2002. Mr. Pluschkell served as President of Global Crossings NextGen from 2001 to August 2002. In another position at a Global Crossing subsidiary, Global Center, he served as Executive Vice President of Global Sales, Marketing, & Products from 2000 to 2001.
(2) Executive Vice President of Sales since August 2004 and Senior Vice President of the Americas from September 2002 to August 2004. Mr. Wojciechowski was the Senior Vice President at eCredit from 2001 to 2002. He served as Senior Vice President of Exodus/Global Center, a Global Crossing Company, from 2000 to 2001. Between 1998 and 2000, he led MoneyLine Network Inc. as Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing.
6
(3) Principal Accounting Officer and Treasurer since January 2006. Ms. Lahera served as Manager of Accounting and Finance and Controller of HyperFeed from July 1999 to December 2005.
Executive Compensation
The following table summarizes the compensation for the past three years of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and the two most highly compensated executive officers who were serving as executive officers and one former executive officers which we collectively refer to as our named executive officers, at the end of 2005.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation |
|
Awards |
|
|
|
|||||||
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year |
|
Salary |
|
Bonus (1) |
|
Other |
|
Shares |
|
All Other |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Paul Pluschkell |
|
2005 |
|
$ |
360,000 |
|
$ |
72,000 |
|
|
|
449,069 |
|
$ |
14,507 |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
10,175 |
|
$ |
10,019 |
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
$ |
225,000 |
|
$ |
337,500 |
|
|
|
35,612 |
|
$ |
9,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Tom Wojciechowski |
|
2005 |
|
$ |
240,000 |
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
|
124,554 |
|
$ |
7,098 |
|
Executive Vice President of Sales |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
194,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,058 |
|
$ |
7,409 |
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
$ |
185,000 |
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
|
14,204 |
|
$ |
7,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Randall J. Frapart (3) |
|
2005 |
|
$ |
198,958 |
|
$ |
9,250 |
|
|
|
9,942 |
|
$ |
8,202 |
|
Senior Vice President and Chief |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
165,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,058 |
|
$ |
6,692 |
|
|
Financial Officer |
|
2003 |
|
$ |
160,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
19,204 |
|
$ |
6,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Joseph Pickel (4) |
|
2005 |
|
$ |
120,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
22,500 |
|
$ |
3,565 |
|
|
Chief Operating Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Mr. Pluschkells bonus amount for 2003 was calculated in accordance with his Employment Agreement. The bonus amount for all other executives for 2003 was discretionary and determined by the Compensation Committee. These bonuses were accrued in 2003 and paid in first quarter 2004. The bonus amount for all executives for 2005 was discretionary and determined by the Compensation Committee. The 2005 bonuses were paid in fourth quarter 2005.
(2) All Other Compensation includes matching contributions by the Company under the Companys 401(k) plan and term life insurance amounts paid by the Company.
(3) Mr. Frapart left the Company in December 2005.
(4) The Company employed Mr. Pickel in June 2005. His annual salary for 2005 was $225,000.
The following table shows the total number of options granted to each of our named executive officers during 2005 (both as the number of shares of common stock subject to such options and as a percentage of all options granted to employees during 2005) and, for each of these grants, the exercise price per share of common stock and option expiration date. On November 4, 2005, the Board of Directors granted stock appreciation rights for 335,494 shares of the Companys common stock at an exercise price of $1.75 per share to certain employees of the Company under the 2005 Incentive Plan, if said 2005 Incentive Plan is approved by the Companys shareholders.
7
OPTION / SAR GRANTS IN 2005 FISCAL YEAR
|
|
Number of |
|
% of Total |
|
Exercise or |
|
Expiration |
|
Potential Realizable |
|
|||||
Name |
|
Options (#) |
|
Fiscal year |
|
($ /Sh) |
|
Date |
|
5%(1) |
|
10%(1) |
|
|||
Paul Pluschkell (2) |
|
5,087 |
|
0.8 |
% |
$ |
1.75 |
|
05/23/10 |
|
$ |
2,460 |
|
$ |
5,435 |
|
Paul Pluschkell (2) |
|
181,656 |
|
27.3 |
% |
$ |
1.75 |
|
11/04/10 |
|
$ |
87,829 |
|
$ |
194,080 |
|
Paul Pluschkell (3) |
|
262,326 |
|
39.4 |
% |
$ |
1.75 |
|
11/04/10 |
|
$ |
126,833 |
|
$ |
280,267 |
|
Tom Wojciechowski (2) |
|
2,029 |
|
0.3 |
% |
$ |
1.75 |
|
05/23/10 |
|
$ |
981 |
|
$ |
2,168 |
|
Tom Wojciechowski (2) |
|
50,048 |
|
7.5 |
% |
$ |
1.75 |
|
11/04/10 |
|
$ |
24,198 |
|
$ |
53,471 |
|
Tom Wojciechowski (3) |
|
72,477 |
|
10.9 |
% |
$ |
1.75 |
|
11/04/10 |
|
$ |
35,042 |
|
$ |
77,434 |
|
Randall J. Frapart (2) |
|
2,029 |
|
0.3 |
% |
$ |
1.75 |
|
05/23/10 |
|
$ |
981 |
|
$ |
2,168 |
|
Randall J. Frapart (2) |
|
7,222 |
|
1.1 |
% |
$ |
1.75 |
|
11/04/10 |
|
$ |
3,492 |
|
$ |
7,716 |
|
Randall J. Frapart (3) |
|
691 |
|
0.1 |
% |
$ |
1.75 |
|
11/04/10 |
|
$ |
334 |
|
$ |
738 |
|
Joseph Pickel (2) |
|
22,500 |
|
3.4 |
% |
$ |
1.80 |
|
06/20/10 |
|
$ |
11,189 |
|
$ |
24,726 |
|
(1) The dollar amounts under these columns are the result of calculations at the 5% appreciation and 10% appreciation rates for the full term of the options as required by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The dollar amounts presented are not intended to forecast possible future appreciation, if any, of the price of our common stock.
(2) The 1999 Combined Incentive and Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan was approved by shareholders on June 16, 1999. The options granted will vest ratably over three years.
(3) The Board of Directors approved the 2005 Incentive Plan on November 4, 2005, subject to approval by the shareholders. These stock-settled SARs will vest ratably over three years.
The following table sets forth, for each of our named executive officers, the total number of shares of common stock underlying unexercised options and the aggregate dollar value of unexercised, in-the-money options / SARs, separately identifying the exercisable and unexercisable options / SARs. The Board of Directors granted stock appreciation rights for 335,494 shares of the Companys common stock at an exercise price of $1.75 per share to certain employees of the Company under the 2005 Incentive Plan, if said 2005 Incentive Plan is approved by the Companys shareholders.
AGGREGATED OPTION / SAR EXERCISES IN 2005 FISCAL YEAR
AND FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION / SAR VALUES
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
Value of |
|
Name |
|
Shares Acquired on |
|
Value Realized ($ )(1) |
|
Exercisable/ |
|
Exercisable/ |
|
Paul Pluschkell |
|
|
|
|
|
67,133 / 467,723 |
|
/ |
|
Tom Wojciechowski |
|
|
|
|
|
20,822 / 131,994 |
|
/ |
|
Randall J. Frapart |
|
|
|
|
|
19,155 / 19,049 |
|
/ |
|
Joseph Pickel |
|
|
|
|
|
/ 22,500 |
|
/ |
|
(1) No options were exercised by any of the named executive officers during 2005. These amounts apply to the 1999 Combined Incentive and Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan.
(2) These values represent the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the shares of common stock subject to Options / SARs on December 31, 2005 over the respective option prices. The closing price of the Companys common stock on December 30, 2005 was below the exercise price of all options granted under the 1999 Combined Incentive and Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan and all SARs granted under the 2005 Incentive Plan.
8
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
Plan Category |
|
(A) |
|
(B) |
|
(C) |
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1) |
|
486,950 |
|
$ |
2.77 |
|
13,050 |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (2) |
|
335,494 |
|
$ |
1.75 |
|
310,626 |
|
Total |
|
822,444 |
|
$ |
2.36 |
|
323,676 |
|
(1) Consists of the 1999 Combined Incentive and Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan.
(2) Consists of the 2005 Incentive Plan.
Stock Plans
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN. We have reserved an aggregate of 646,120 shares of common stock for issuance under our 2005 Incentive Plan, which may be granted to our employees, officers, directors and consultants. The 2005 Incentive Plan is administered by our Compensation Committee. Generally, options may be granted in the form of stock options, stock-based stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, performance shares, performance units, restricted stock units, deferred compensation awards, and other forms of stock-based awards (as defined in the 2005 Incentive Plan). During the past fiscal year, stock-settled stock appreciation rights for 335,494 shares were granted under the 2005 Incentive Plan, subject to shareholder approval. See Proposal 2, Approval of the HyperFeed Technologies, Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
Employment Contracts and Termination of Employment and Change-in-Control Arrangements
Mr. Pluschkell had an employment agreement for the period of January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2005 that provided for base salary, for bonuses based on the Company meeting certain financial and performance metrics, and for one year of base salary if he was terminated from the Company. That employment agreement did not contain a change in control clause. Mr. Wojciechowski has an agreement that provides for bonuses based on the Company meeting certain financial and performance metrics through December 31, 2006.
9
STOCK OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth information as of April 6, 2006 regarding the beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock by each director and named executive officer, and by all current directors and executive officers as a group.
Name |
|
Beneficial |
|
Percent of |
|
Paul Pluschkell (2) |
|
102,395 |
|
1.3 |
% |
Ronald Langley (3) |
|
6,367,790 |
|
82.0 |
% |
John Hart (3) |
|
6,367,790 |
|
82.0 |
% |
Kenneth J. Slepicka (4) |
|
6,531 |
|
* |
|
Louis J. Morgan (5) |
|
6,732 |
|
* |
|
Carlos C. Campbell |
|
|
|
* |
|
Tom Wojciechowski (6) |
|
37,388 |
|
* |
|
Randall J. Frapart |
|
|
|
* |
|
Joseph Pickel |
|
|
|
* |
|
All Directors and Officers as a Group (9 persons) (7) |
|
6,520,836 |
|
84.0 |
% |
* Represents holdings of less than 1%.
(1) The percent of class calculation for each named officer or director includes shares that may be acquired upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of April 6, 2006. Such shares are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage beneficially owned, but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage beneficially owned by any other person.
(2) Includes 84,091 shares of common stock, which may be acquired upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of April 6, 2006.
(3) Mr. Langley, a Director of HyperFeed since 1995, is a Director and Chairman of PICO. Mr. Hart, a Director of HyperFeed since July 1997, is a Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of PICO. Messrs. Hart and Langley each have beneficial ownership of 25.2% of PICOs shares; however, Messrs. Hart and Langley each disclaim beneficial ownership of the 3,333,333 PICO shares owned by PICO Equity Investors, L. P., pursuant to Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. As such, Mr. Langley and Mr. Hart each may be deemed to beneficially own the 6,367,790 shares of our common stock beneficially owned by PICO. This number of shares deemed beneficially owned includes 250,000 shares of common stock that are issuable upon exercise of common stock Purchase Warrants issued to PICO. See Principal Stockholders. Mr. Langley and Mr. Hart each disclaim beneficial ownership of these shares within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
(4) Includes 1,334 shares of common stock, which may be acquired upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of April 6, 2006.
(5) Includes 1,334 shares of common stock, which may be acquired upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of April 6, 2006.
(6) Includes 27,585 shares of common stock, which may be acquired upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of April 6, 2006.
(7) Includes 114,344 shares of common stock, which may be acquired upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of April 6, 2006. Includes 250,000 shares of common stock, which may be acquired upon exercise of common stock Purchase Warrants.
10
Principal Stockholders
The following table sets forth information as of April 6, 2006 regarding each person other than our directors who were known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of the outstanding shares of common stock. Each person named has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned by such person.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
|
Number of Shares |
|
Percent of |
|
PICO
Holdings, Inc |
|
6,367,790 |
(2) |
82.0 |
% |
(1) The percent of the outstanding shares is based upon the number of common shares outstanding as of April 6, 2006 (6,117,790), plus 250,000 common shares that the selling security holder may acquire upon exercise of warrants.
(2) On April 12, 2006, PICO filed an amended Schedule 13D with the Securities and Exchange Commission reporting that it beneficially owns 6,367,790 shares of our common stock. Such amount includes 250,000 common shares, which may be acquired upon exercise of the Common Stock Purchase Warrants beneficially owned directly by PICO.
Certain Transactions
On August 26, 2005, the Company and PICO amended and restated an existing Secured Convertible Promissory Note (the Restated Convertible Note). Under the terms of the Restated Convertible Note, the Company could borrow up to $6.0 million at an interest rate of prime plus 2.75%. The Company was obligated to repay all outstanding principal and accrued interest under the Restated Convertible Note on March 28, 2006. The Restated Convertible Note, which was convertible by PICO at any time into shares of HyperFeeds common stock, provided that the number of shares that PICO would receive in connection with a conversion of any amounts outstanding under the Restated Convertible Note would be determined by dividing the total outstanding amount to be converted by the lesser of $1.36 per share and 80% of the five-day moving average per share price of HyperFeeds common stock on the date of conversion. The number of shares of HyperFeeds common stock issuable upon conversion of the Restated Convertible Note was not subject to a cap. In addition, in connection with issuing the Restated Convertible Note, the Company issued to PICO a warrant to purchase 125,000 shares of HyperFeeds common stock, at an exercise price of $1.70 per share. The warrant expires on August 26, 2008.
On November 1, 2005, PICO elected to convert the $6.0 million borrowed under the terms of the Restated Convertible Note and accrued interest of $0.2 million into 4,546,479 shares of HyperFeeds common stock at a conversion rate of $1.36 per share. The warrants remain outstanding.
On December 20, 2005, we issued a Promissory Note to PICO in the amount of $0.8 million at an interest rate of 7.0% per annum. In the first quarter of 2006, we issued additional promissory notes to PICO totaling $3.4 million at an interest rate of 7.0% per annum. The principal sum borrowed under the December 20, 2005 Promissory Note and the promissory notes issued in the first quarter of 2006 totaled $4.2 million. In connection with the issuance of the promissory notes in the first quarter of 2006, the December 20, 2005 Promissory Note was cancelled.
On March 30, 2006, the Company issued to PICO a Secured Convertible Promissory Note (the 2006 Convertible Note) which replaces the promissory notes issued in the first quarter of 2006. Under the terms of the 2006 Convertible Note, the Company may borrow up to $10.0 million at an interest rate of prime plus 2.75%. The Company is obligated to repay all outstanding principal and accrued interest under the 2006 Convertible Note two years from issuance. The 2006 Convertible Note, which is convertible by PICO at any time into HyperFeeds common stock, provides that the number of shares that PICO would receive in connection with a conversion of any amounts outstanding under the 2006 Convertible Note would be determined by dividing the total outstanding amount to be converted by the lesser of (i) 80% of the five-day moving average per share price of HyperFeeds common stock on the date of conversion or (ii) 80% of $1.05 per share.
11
The number of shares of HyperFeeds common stock issuable upon conversion of the 2006 Convertible Note is not subject to a cap. In addition, in connection with issuing the 2006 Convertible Note, the Company issued to PICO a warrant to purchase 125,000 shares of HyperFeeds common stock, at an exercise price of $1.05 per share. The warrant expires on March 30, 2009. As of April 6, 2006, the Company has drawn $4,160,000 on the Note.
As of April 6, 2006, Messrs. Hart and Langley each have beneficial ownership of 25.2% of PICOs shares; however, Messrs. Hart and Langley each disclaim beneficial ownership of the 3,333,333 PICO shares owned by PICO Equity Investors, L. P., pursuant to Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Mr. Langley, a Director and Chairman of HyperFeed, is a Director and Chairman of PICO. Mr. Hart, a Director of HyperFeed, is a Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of PICO. As such, Messrs. Hart and Langley each may be deemed to beneficially own the 6,367,790 shares, or 82.0%, of our common stock beneficially owned by PICO. This number of shares deemed beneficially owned includes 250,000 shares of common stock that are issuable upon exercise of two common stock Purchase Warrants issued to PICO, each for 125,000 shares of common stock. Messrs. Hart and Langley each disclaim beneficial ownership of HyperFeeds common stock held by PICO, pursuant to Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities, to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and our other equity securities. Officers, directors and greater than ten-percent shareholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
To our knowledge, based solely on review of the copies of such reports furnished to us during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, our officers, directors and greater than ten-percent beneficial owners complied with all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements except: Messrs. Pluschkell, Wojciechowski, and Frapart filed two late reports on Form 4 reporting options granted in May 2005 and November 2005.
REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Audit Committee is comprised solely of independent directors within the meaning of NASD listing standards and Rule 10a-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors in May 2000. The composition of the Audit Committee, the attributes of its members and the responsibilities of the Committee, as reflected in its charter, are intended to be in accordance with applicable requirements for corporate audit committees. Mr. Slepicka is an Audit Committee financial expert within the meaning of Rule 10a-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
As described more fully in its charter, the purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities. The Audit Committees primary duties and responsibilities are to monitor the integrity of the Companys financial reporting process and systems of internal controls regarding finance, accounting and legal compliance and to monitor the independence and performance of the Companys independent auditors.
The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and pre-approving any non-audit services to be performed by the Companys independent auditors. The Audit Committee reviews and, if appropriate, approves non-audit service engagements, taking into account the proposed scope of the non-audit services, the proposed fees for the non-audit services, whether the non-audit services are permissible under applicable law or regulation and the likely impact of the non-audit services on the independence of the independent auditors.
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with the management of HyperFeed and Deloitte & Touche LLP (Deloitte), the Companys independent auditors, the audited financial statements of the Company contained in the Companys annual report to stockholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005. The Audit Committee also has discussed with representatives of Deloitte the matters required to be discussed pursuant to Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 (Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, Communication with Audit Committees).
12
The Audit Committee has received and reviewed the written disclosures and letter from Deloitte required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees), and has discussed with Deloitte their independence. The Audit Committee also has considered whether the provision of other non-audit services to the Company by Deloitte is compatible with maintaining their independence.
Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Audit Committee
Kenneth J. Slepicka, Chair
Louis J. Morgan
Carlos C. Campbell
RELATIONSHIP WITH INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
Deloitte & Touche (including Deloitte & Touche LLP, the member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu and their respective affiliates (Deloitte)), a certified public accounting firm, has acted as our independent auditors since October 2004, having been appointed by our Board, and anticipate that the Company will engage Deloitte to audit our financial statements at and for the year ending December 31, 2006. The Company also engaged Deloitte to (1) provide tax consulting services to HyperFeed and (2) prepare certain tax filings for HyperFeed and its subsidiaries. A representative of Deloitte is expected to be present at the annual meeting and will have an opportunity to make an independent statement if he or she desires to do so. The representative is expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.
In considering the nature of services provided by the independent auditor, the Audit Committee determined that such services are compatible with the provision of independent audit services. The Audit Committee discussed these services with the independent auditor and Company management to determine that they are permitted under the rules and regulations concerning auditor independence promulgated by the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) to implement the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
The Audit Committee has not selected or appointed an independent auditing firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006. The Audit Committee customarily makes this selection and appointment in the third quarter.
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees and Services.
The following is a summary of the fees billed to us by Deloitte for professional services rendered for the years ended December 31, 2004, and December 31, 2005:
Fee Category |
|
2004 Fees |
|
2005 Fees |
|
||
Audit Fees |
|
$ |
176,000 |
|
$ |
199,000 |
|
Audit Related Fees |
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
||
Tax Fees |
|
25,000 |
|
28,000 |
|
||
All Other Fees |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Total Fees |
|
$ |
213,000 |
|
$ |
227,000 |
|
The Audit Committee approved all fees outlined in the table above.
Audit Fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements and review of the interim consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports, and services that are normally provided by Deloitte in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. KPMG billed HyperFeed
13
$42,700 for the reviews of the interim financial statements included in HyperFeeds Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed during the first and second quarters of fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, which are not included in the table above.
Audit-Related Fees consist of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our consolidated financial statements and are not reported under Audit Fees that include the audit of HyperFeeds 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan.
Tax Fees consist of fees billed for professional services for corporate tax return preparation and filing, compliance, tax advice and tax planning. These services include assistance regarding federal, state and international tax compliance, tax audit defense.
All Other Fees (if any) consist of fees for products and services other than the services reported above. Deloitte has not billed HyperFeed for any other services performed in 2004 or 2005.
Pre-Approval Policy
Pursuant to Sections 201 and 202 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Audit Committee has recommended and the Board of Directors has approved pre-approval guidelines for all audit and non-audit services to be provided by the Companys independent auditing firm. These pre-approval guidelines are:
1. At the earliest possible date, management shall inform the Audit Committee of each audit or non-audit service which management desires the Companys independent auditing firm to perform.
2. Management shall promptly provide to the Audit Committee detailed information about the particular services to be provided by the Companys independent auditing firm.
3. The supporting documentation provided to the Audit Committee by management shall be sufficiently detailed so that the Audit Committee knows precisely what services it is being asked to pre-approve.
4. As permitted by Section 202(3), the Audit Committee has delegated pre-approval authority to the Chairman of the Audit Committee. All such pre-approvals shall be presented to the full Audit Committee at the Audit Committees next scheduled meeting.
5. Approval by the Audit Committee of all non-audit services shall be disclosed by the Company in its 10-Q and 10-K filings, as required by Section 202(2).
REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
To Our Stockholders:
In October 1997, the Board established a Compensation Committee for administering our executive compensation programs. Prior to that time, the entire Board was generally responsible for administering the programs. The Compensation Committee also assumed responsibility for administering our Option Plans from our Incentive Stock Committee.
Compensation Philosophy
Our executive compensation program is intended to attract, develop, reward and retain quality management talent. It is our philosophy that executive compensation should recognize an individuals contribution to us and should be competitive with compensation offered by other computer software and service companies. To further align executive officers interests with those of the stockholders, our executive compensation program also relies on stock option awards.
14
Compensation Components
The components of our executive compensation program are as follows: base salary, bonus and stock option awards.
Base Salary. The Board establishes the base salary to be paid to our chief executive officer based upon recommendations from the Compensation Committee. In determining their recommendations, the Committee takes into account several factors such as an individuals experience, responsibilities, management and leadership abilities, and job performance in the prior year.
Bonus. For 2005, the Compensation Committee and the Board approved guidelines for the payment of cash bonuses to executives based upon improvements in the operating performance of the Company. Messrs. Pluschkell, Wojciechowski, and Frapart received bonus payments for 2005 that were paid in the fourth quarter of 2005. No bonuses were awarded in 2004.
Stock Options. The Board believes stock options are a key long-term incentive vehicle because they provide executives with the opportunity to acquire or increase an equity interest in us and to share in the appreciation of the value of our common stock. Stock option grants, therefore, directly align the executives interest with those of the stockholders.
Stock options are granted to the executive officers and other key managers by our Compensation Committee under our 1999 Combined Incentive Stock and Non-Statutory Option Plan and under our 2005 Incentive Plan, upon shareholder approval. Options are generally granted with a three-year vesting and a five-year exercise period in order to encourage executives and managers to take a long-term view of the impact of their individual contributions to us. In determining the number of options to be awarded to each individual, the Committee considers the executives level of management responsibility and potential impact on our profitability and growth. During the 2005 fiscal year, options were granted to Messrs. Pluschkell, Wojciechowski, and Frapart at an option price equal to or greater than the fair market value of our stock on the date of grant.
The Compensation Committee has considered the provisions of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and related income tax regulations which restrict the deductibility of certain compensation paid to the Companys Chief Executive Officer and each of the four most highly compensated officers holding office at the end of any year, to the extent such compensation paid to any of these officers exceeds $1,000,000 in any year and fails to qualify for an exemption from the restriction. In view of the Companys compensation structure, the Compensation Committee believes it is unlikely that this will impact the Company in the near future. The Compensation Committee will continue to monitor this.
Chief Executive Officer Compensation
The Compensation Committee and Board establish the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer. In determining the level of compensation, the Committee and Board consider a variety of factors, such as experience, effectiveness as a manager, leadership skills, and job performance in the prior year, as well as the market value of Chief Executive Officers of similar companies in similar industries.
Compensation Committee
Ronald Langley, Chair
John R. Hart
Kenneth J. Slepicka
15
COMPARATIVE CUMULATIVE SHAREHOLDER RETURN
The graph presented below compares the five-year cumulative total return of HyperFeed, the Nasdaq US Index and the Nasdaq Computer & Data Processing Services Stocks index from December 31, 2000 to December 31, 2005. Total return is based on an assumed investment of $100 on December 31, 2000.
Comparison 5-Year Cumulative Total Return
Among Hyperfeed Technologies, Inc., S&P 500 Index, and Russell 2000 Index
Assumes $100 invested on Jan. 1, 2001
Fiscal Year Ending Dec. 31, 2005
|
|
2000 |
|
2001 |
|
2002 |
|
2003 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
HYPR |
|
100.00 |
|
39.04 |
|
19.20 |
|
39.30 |
|
17.28 |
|
8.64 |
|
Nasdaq Composite Index |
|
100.00 |
|
79.20 |
|
54.49 |
|
82.08 |
|
89.55 |
|
91.42 |
|
Nasdaq Computer Index |
|
100.00 |
|
75.75 |
|
48.15 |
|
72.49 |
|
75.04 |
|
77.5 |
|
Annual Report
Our annual report to stockholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, including financial statements, accompanies this Proxy Statement. However, no action is proposed to be taken at the meeting with respect to the annual report, and it is not to be considered as constituting any part of the proxy soliciting material.
Stockholder Proposals
From time to time stockholders may present proposals which may be proper subjects for inclusion in the proxy statement and for consideration at the annual meeting. To be considered, proposals must be submitted on a timely basis. We must receive proposals for the 2007 stockholders meeting no later than February 26, 2007. Any such proposals, as well as any questions related thereto, should be directed to our Secretary.
Pursuant to Rule 14a-4 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, if a shareholder notifies us after February 22, 2006 of an intent to present a proposal at our 2006 Annual Meeting of shareholders, our proxy holders will
16
have the right to exercise discretionary vesting authority with respect to the proposal without including information regarding the proposal in our proxy materials.
Other Matters
Management knows of no other business likely to be brought before the meeting. If other matters do come before the meeting, the persons named in the form of proxy or their substitute will vote said proxy according to their best judgment.
A copy of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 is available without charge to stockholders upon written request to our Principal Accounting Officer and is available on the Companys Web site, www.hyperfeed.com.
By order of the Board of Directors
GEMMA LAHERA
Principal Accounting Officer
and Treasurer
17
Appendix A
HyperFeed Technologies, Inc.
2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan
1
2
3
which the Stock has traded on such securities exchange or market system, the date on which the Fair Market Value shall be established shall be the last day on which the Stock was so traded prior to the relevant date, or such other appropriate day as shall be determined by the Committee, in its discretion.
X = Y(A-B)/A, where
X = the number of shares of Stock to be issued to the Participant upon exercise of the Option;
Y = the total number of shares with respect to which the Participant has elected to exercise the Option;
A = the Fair Market Value of one (1) share of Stock;
B = the exercise price per share (as defined in the Participants Award Agreement).
4
5
Code §401(k) plan as in effect on the Effective Date, whether or not the Participant is participating in, or eligible to participant in, that plan].
6
7
8
accordance with Section 4.2) as the replaced Option and otherwise provides substantially equivalent terms and conditions as the replaced Option, as determined by the Committee;
9
10
Employees, prospective Consultants and prospective Non-employee Directors to whom Awards are granted in connection with written offers of an employment or other service relationship with the Participating Company Group; provided, however, that no Stock subject to any such Award shall vest, become exercisable or be issued prior to the date on which such person commences Service.
11
Options shall be the number of shares determined in accordance with Section 4.1, subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.2 and further subject to the limitation set forth in Section 5.4(b) below.
Options shall be evidenced by Award Agreements specifying the number of shares of Stock covered thereby, in such form as the Committee shall from time to time establish. No Option or purported Option shall be a valid and binding obligation of the Company unless evidenced by a fully executed Award Agreement. Award Agreements evidencing Options may
12
incorporate all or any of the terms of the Plan by reference and shall comply with and be subject to the following terms and conditions:
13
14
Stock Appreciation Rights shall be evidenced by Award Agreements specifying the number of shares of Stock subject to the Award, in such form as the Committee shall from time to time establish. No SAR or purported SAR shall be a valid and binding obligation of the Company unless evidenced by a fully executed Award Agreement. Award Agreements evidencing SARs may incorporate all or any of the terms of the Plan by reference and shall comply with and be subject to the following terms and conditions:
(b) Freestanding SARs shall be exercisable at such time or times, or upon such event or events, and subject to such terms, conditions, performance criteria and restrictions that shall be determined by the Committee and set forth in the Award Agreement evidencing such SAR; provided, however, that no Freestanding SAR shall be exercisable after the expiration of ten (10) years after the effective date of grant of such SAR.
15
anticipation, alienation, sale, exchange, transfer, assignment, pledge, encumbrance, or garnishment by creditors of the Participant or the Participants beneficiary, except transfer by will or by the laws of descent and distribution.
Restricted Stock Awards shall be evidenced by Award Agreements specifying the number of shares of Stock subject to the Award, in such form as the Committee shall from time to time establish. No Restricted Stock Award or purported Restricted Stock Award shall be a valid and binding obligation of the Company unless evidenced by a fully executed Award Agreement. Award Agreements evidencing Restricted Stock Awards may incorporate all or any of the terms of the Plan by reference and shall comply with and be subject to the following terms and conditions:
16
Performance Awards shall be evidenced by Award Agreements in such form as the Committee shall from time to time establish. No Performance Award or purported Performance Award shall be a valid and binding obligation of the Company unless evidenced by a fully executed Award Agreement. Award Agreements evidencing Performance Awards may incorporate all or any of the terms of the Plan by reference and shall comply with and be subject to the following terms and conditions:
17
18
Performance Award. Performance Measures may be one or more of the following, as determined by the Committee: (i) sales revenue; (ii) gross margin; (iii) operating margin; (iv) operating income; (v) pre-tax profit; (vi) earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization; (vii) net income; (viii) expenses; (ix) the market price of the Stock; (x) earnings per share; (xi) return on shareholder equity; (xii) return on capital; (xiii) return on net assets; (xiv) economic value added; and (xv) market share; (xvi) post-tax profit; (xvii) total shareholder return; (xviii) customer satisfaction; (xix) safety; (xx) customer service; or (xxi) such other measures as determined by the Committee consistent with this Section 9.4(a).
19
the appropriate entry on the books of the Company or of a duly authorized transfer agent of the Company). However, the Committee, in its discretion, may provide in the Award Agreement evidencing any Performance Share Award that the Participant shall be entitled to receive Dividend Equivalents with respect to the payment of cash dividends on Stock having a record date prior to the date on which the Performance Shares are settled or forfeited. Such Dividend Equivalents, if any, may be credited to the Participant in the form of cash. Dividend Equivalents will be accumulated and paid to the extent that Performance Shares become nonforfeitable, as determined by the Committee. Settlement of Dividend Equivalents will be made in cash and may be paid on the same basis as settlement of the related Performance Share as provided in Section 9.5. Dividend Equivalents shall not be paid with respect to Performance Units. In the event of a dividend or distribution paid in shares of Stock or any other adjustment made upon a change in the capital structure of the Company as described in Section 4.2, appropriate adjustments shall be made in the Participants Performance Share Award so that it represents the right to receive upon settlement any and all new, substituted or additional securities or other property (other than normal cash dividends) to which the Participant would entitled by reason of the shares of Stock issuable upon settlement of the Performance Share Award, and all such new, substituted or additional securities or other property shall be immediately subject to the same Performance Goals as are applicable to the Award.
20
Restricted Stock Unit Awards shall be evidenced by Award Agreements specifying the number of Restricted Stock Units subject to the Award, in such form as the Committee shall from time to time establish. No Restricted Stock Unit Award or purported Restricted Stock Unit Award shall be a valid and binding obligation of the Company unless evidenced by a fully executed Award Agreement. Award Agreements evidencing Restricted Stock Units may incorporate all or any of the terms of the Plan by reference and shall comply with and be subject to the following terms and conditions:
21
Award, and all such new, substituted or additional securities or other property shall be immediately subject to the same Vesting Conditions as are applicable to the Award.
22
23
the Participant would be entitled by reason of the shares of Stock issuable upon settlement of the Award.
In addition to the Awards set forth in Sections 6 through 11 above, the Committee, in its sole discretion, may carry out the purpose of this Plan by awarding Stock-Based Awards as it determines to be in the best interests of the Company and subject to such other terms and conditions as it deems necessary and appropriate.
24
The grant of Awards and the issuance of shares of Stock pursuant to any Award shall be subject to compliance with all applicable requirements of federal, state and foreign law with respect to such securities and the requirements of any stock exchange or market system upon which the Stock may then be listed. In addition, no Award may be exercised or shares issued pursuant to an Award unless (a) a registration statement under the Securities Act shall at the time of such exercise or issuance be in effect with respect to the shares issuable pursuant to the Award or (b) in the opinion of legal counsel to the Company, the shares issuable pursuant to the Award may be issued in accordance with the terms of an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act. The inability of the Company to obtain from any regulatory body having jurisdiction the authority, if any, deemed by the Companys legal counsel to be necessary to the lawful issuance and sale of any shares hereunder shall relieve the Company of any liability in respect of the failure to issue or sell such shares as to which such requisite authority shall not have been obtained. As a condition to issuance of any Stock, the Company may require the Participant to satisfy any qualifications that may be necessary or appropriate, to evidence compliance with any applicable law or regulation and to make any representation or warranty with respect thereto as may be requested by the Company.
The Board or the Committee may amend, suspend or terminate the Plan at any time. However, without the approval of the Companys shareholders, there shall be (a) no increase in the maximum aggregate number of shares of Stock that may be issued under the Plan (except by operation of the provisions of Section 4.2), (b) no change in the class of persons eligible to receive Incentive Stock Options, and (c) no other amendment of the Plan that would require approval of the Companys shareholders under any applicable law, regulation or rule. No
25
amendment, suspension or termination of the Plan shall affect any then outstanding Award unless expressly provided by the Board or the Committee. In any event, no amendment, suspension or termination of the Plan may adversely affect any then outstanding Award without the consent of the Participant unless necessary to comply with any applicable law, regulation or rule. Notwithstanding the above, no amendment or termination of the Plan shall accelerate the payment of any deferred compensation as prohibited by Code Section 409A.
26
enforceability of the remaining provisions (or any part thereof) of the Plan shall not in any way be affected or impaired thereby.
27
PROXY
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
HYPERFEED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
300 SOUTH WACKER DRIVE, SUITE 300
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60606
THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY APPOINTS PAUL PLUSCHKELL AND GEMMA LAHERA AS PROXIES, EACH WITH THE POWER TO APPOINT A SUBSTITUTE, AND HEREBY AUTHORIZES THEM TO REPRESENT AND TO VOTE, AS DESIGNATED BELOW, ALL THE COMMON STOCK OF HYPERFEED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. HELD OF RECORD BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON JUNE 6, 2006 AT THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON AUGUST 4, 2006 OR ANY ADJOURNMENT OR POSTPONEMENT THEREOF.
(1) ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
/ / FOR all nominees listed below (except as marked to the contrary below)
/ / WITHHOLD AUTHORITY to vote for all nominees listed below.
Ronald Langley, John R. Hart, Kenneth J. Slepicka, Louis J. Morgan, Carlos C. Campbell
INSTRUCTION: TO WITHHOLD
AUTHORITY TO VOTE FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL NOMINEE WRITE THAT
NOMINEES NAME IN THE SPACE PROVIDED BELOW:
|
|
(2) To approve the HyperFeed Technologies, Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
/ / FOR / / AGAINST / / ABSTAIN
(3) In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting.
(CONTINUED, AND TO BE SIGNED ON OTHER SIDE)
THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY ENDORSED WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED STOCKHOLDER. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF ALL NOMINEES.
PLEASE SIGN EXACTLY AS NAME APPEARS BELOW. FOR JOINT ACCOUNTS, ALL TENANTS SHOULD SIGN. IF SIGNING FOR AN ESTATE, TRUST, CORPORATION, PARTNERSHIP OR OTHER ENTITY, TITLE OR CAPACITY SHOULD BE STATED.
|
DATED: ____________________ , 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
|
|
|
|
Signature if held jointly |
PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE PROXY CARD
PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED RETURN ENVELOPE