UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 6-K

Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 Under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the month of May, 2009

Cameco Corporation

(Commission file No. 1-14228)

2121-11th Street West
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7M 1J3
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

Form 20-F     o		Form 40-F     þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Yes     o		No     þ

If “Yes” is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b):                           

 

 

Exhibit Index

Exhibit No.		Description		Page No.
1.		Cameco Corporation — Annual Meeting — May 27, 2009, Report of Voting Results

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 

May 28, 2009 Canadian Securities Administrators		GARY M. S. CHAD, Q.C. Senior Vice-President, Governance, Law and Corporate Secretary CAMECO CORPORATION Corporate Office 2121 – 11th Street West Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada S7M 1J3 Tel 306.956.6303 Fax 306.956.6312 www.cameco.com

Cameco Corporation
Annual Meeting May 27,2009
Report of Voting Results
Under National Instrument 51-102

In accordance with Section 11.3 of National Instrument 51-102 — Continuous Disclosure Obligations, we hereby advise of the results of the voting on the matters submitted to the annual meeting (the “Meeting”) of the shareholders (the “Shareholders”) of Cameco Corporation (the “Corporation”) held on May 27, 2009. Each of the matters set forth below is described in greater detail in the Notice for the Meeting and Management Proxy Circular mailed to Shareholders prior to the Meeting.

The matters voted upon at the Meeting and the results of the voting were as follows:

Item 1:     Election of Directors

The following directors were elected to hold office for the ensuing year or until their successors are elected or appointed:

John H. Clappison Joe F. Colvin James. R. Curtiss George S. Dembroski Donald H. F. Deranger James K. Gowans Gerald W. Grandey		Nancy E. Hopkins Oyvind Hushovd J.W. George Ivany A. Anne McLellan A. Neil McMillan Robert W. Peterson Victor J. Zaleschuk

NUCLEAR. The Clean Air Energy.

May 28, 2009
Page 2

If a ballot vote had been taken, based upon proxy votes by Shareholders received by the Corporation and after giving effect to the twenty-five (25%) percent non-resident Shareholder voting restriction, the voting results for the election of directors would have been:

	Nominee			Votes For					% Votes For					Withheld					% Votes Withheld
	John H. Clappison				183,166,597					98.27	%				3,229,246					1.73	%
	Joe Colvin				185,151,608					99.33	%				1,244,234					0.67	%
	James R. Curtiss				182,153,309					97.72	%				4,242,533					2.28	%
	George S. Dembroski				184,804,220					99.15	%				1,591,622					0.85	%
	Donald H. F. Deranger				182,495,166					97.91	%				3,900,676					2.09	%
	James K. Gowans				185,343,295					99.44	%				1,052,547					0.56	%
	Gerald W. Grandey				185,421,936					99.48	%				973,906					0.52	%
	Nancy E. Hopkins				185,067,727					99.29	%				1,328,116					0.71	%
	Oyvind Hushovd				184,717,879					99.10	%				1,677,964					0.90	%
	J.W. George Ivany				184,713,344					99.10	%				1,682,499					0.90	%
	A. Anne McLellan				184,619,828					99.05	%				1,776,014					0.95	%
	A. Neil McMillan				185,168,507					99.34	%				1,227,335					0.66	%
	Robert W. Peterson				184,781,588					99.13	%				1,614,254					0.87	%
	Victor J. Zaleschuk				184,828,474					99.16	%				1,567,369					0.84	%

Item 2:     Appointment of Auditors

By a vote by way of show of hands, KPMG LLP was appointed auditors of the Corporation to hold office until the next annual meeting of Shareholders, or until their successors are appointed.

If a ballot vote had been taken, based upon proxy votes by Shareholders received by the Corporation and after giving effect to the twenty-five (25%) percent non-resident Shareholder voting restriction, the voting results for appointment of auditors would have been:

	Votes For			% Votes For					Votes Withheld					% Votes Withheld
	185,621,270				99.59	%				770,522					0.41	%