Unassociated Document
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010
¨
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
FOR THE
TRANSITION PERIOD FROM
TO
Commission
File Number: 001-34058
NILE
THERAPEUTICS, INC.
(Exact
Name Of Registrant As Specified In Its Charter)
Delaware
|
88-0363465
|
(State
of Incorporation)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification
No.)
|
4
West 4
th Ave.,
Suite 400, San Mateo, CA 94402
(Address
of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
(650)
458-2670
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Not
Applicable
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes
x No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to submit and post such files).
¨ Yes
¨ No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated
filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large
accelerated filer
¨
|
Accelerated
filer
¨
|
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer
¨ (Do not check if
a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller
reporting company
x
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
¨ No
x
As of
November 12, 2010, there were 34,629,794 shares of common stock, par value
$0.001 per share, of Nile Therapeutics, Inc. issued and
outstanding.
Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART I
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
4
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements (unaudited)
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Balance Sheets
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Statements of Operations
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Statement of Stockholders’ Equity
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Statements of Cash Flows
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
to Condensed Financial Statements
|
8
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
17
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
23
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
23
|
|
|
|
PART II
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
24
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
24
|
|
|
|
Item 1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
24
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
24
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
24
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
[Removed
and Reserved]
|
24
|
|
|
|
Item 5.
|
Other
Information
|
24
|
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
Exhibits
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
Index
|
27
|
Forward-Looking
Statements
This
Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or
the Exchange Act. Any statements about our expectations, beliefs, plans,
objectives, assumptions or future events or performance are not historical facts
and may be forward-looking. These forward-looking statements include, but are
not limited to, statements about:
|
•
|
the
development of our product
candidates;
|
|
•
|
the
regulatory approval of our product
candidates;
|
|
•
|
our
use of clinical research centers and other
contractors;
|
|
•
|
our
ability to find collaborative partners for research, development and
commercialization of potential
products;
|
|
•
|
acceptance
of our products by doctors, patients or
payors;
|
|
•
|
our
ability to market any of our product
candidates;
|
|
•
|
our
history of operating losses;
|
|
•
|
our
ability to compete against other companies and research
institutions;
|
|
•
|
our
ability to secure adequate protection for our intellectual
property;
|
|
•
|
our
ability to attract and retain key
personnel;
|
|
•
|
availability
of reimbursement for our product
candidates;
|
|
•
|
the
effect of potential strategic transactions on our
business;
|
|
•
|
our
ability to obtain adequate financing;
and
|
|
•
|
the
volatility of our stock price.
|
These
statements are often, but not always, made through the use of words or phrases
such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “plan,” “project,” “continuing,” “ongoing,”
“expect,” “believe,” “intend” and similar words or phrases. For such statements,
we claim the protection of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Readers of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are cautioned not to place undue
reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the time
this report was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. These
forward-looking statements are based largely on our expectations and projections
about future events and future trends affecting our business, and are subject to
risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially
from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements. Discussions containing
these forward-looking statements may be found throughout this report, including
Part I, the section entitled “Item 2: Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” These forward-looking statements
involve risks and uncertainties, including the risks discussed in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, that could cause our
actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking
statements. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly
revise our forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that
arise after the filing of this report or documents incorporated by reference
herein that include forward-looking statements. The risks discussed in this
report should be considered in evaluating our prospects and future financial
performance.
In
addition, past financial or operating performance is not necessarily a reliable
indicator of future performance and you should not use our historical
performance to anticipate results or future period trends. We can give no
assurances that any of the events anticipated by the forward-looking statements
will occur or, if any of them do, what impact they will have on our results of
operations and financial condition.
References
to the “Company,” “Nile,” the “Registrant,” “we,” “us,” or “our” in this report
refer to Nile Therapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation, unless the context
indicates otherwise.
PART
I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements.
|
NILE
THERAPUTICS, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONDENSED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
4,435,833 |
|
|
$ |
3,175,718 |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
304,076 |
|
|
|
257,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
4,739,909 |
|
|
|
3,433,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
|
|
16,777 |
|
|
|
27,486 |
|
Intangible
assets, net
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
106,830 |
|
Other
noncurrent assets
|
|
|
51,938 |
|
|
|
51,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
4,808,624 |
|
|
$ |
3,619,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
591,553 |
|
|
$ |
150,628 |
|
Accrued expenses
and other current liabilities
|
|
|
837,957 |
|
|
|
402,772 |
|
Due
to related party
|
|
|
75,238 |
|
|
|
84,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
1,504,748 |
|
|
|
637,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized,
none
issued and outstanding
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Common
stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized,
34,629,794
and 27,085,824 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
34,630 |
|
|
|
27,086 |
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
42,403,783 |
|
|
|
36,853,767 |
|
Deficit
accumulated during the development stage
|
|
|
(39,134,537 |
) |
|
|
(33,898,703 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
stockholders' equity
|
|
|
3,303,876 |
|
|
|
2,982,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
|
$ |
4,808,624 |
|
|
$ |
3,619,704 |
|
See
accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.
NILE
THERAPUTICS, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
|
|
Three months ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 1, 2005 (inception)
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
through September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant
income
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
482,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research
and development
|
|
|
1,148,641 |
|
|
|
1,149,232 |
|
|
|
3,517,822 |
|
|
|
3,577,264 |
|
|
|
25,295,877 |
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
664,095 |
|
|
|
869,143 |
|
|
|
1,732,745 |
|
|
|
2,729,300 |
|
|
|
13,729,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
1,812,736 |
|
|
|
2,018,375 |
|
|
|
5,250,567 |
|
|
|
6,306,564 |
|
|
|
39,025,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from operations
|
|
|
(1,812,736 |
) |
|
|
(2,018,375 |
) |
|
|
(5,250,567 |
) |
|
|
(6,306,564 |
) |
|
|
(38,543,149 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
|
5,954 |
|
|
|
15,194 |
|
|
|
17,526 |
|
|
|
35,767 |
|
|
|
785,108 |
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,273,734 |
) |
Other
expense
|
|
|
(2,711 |
) |
|
|
(24,499 |
) |
|
|
(2,793 |
) |
|
|
(35,781 |
) |
|
|
(102,762 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
other income (expense)
|
|
|
3,243 |
|
|
|
(9,305 |
) |
|
|
14,733 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(591,388 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$ |
(1,809,493 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,027,680 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,235,834 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,306,578 |
) |
|
$ |
(39,134,537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted loss per share
|
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.17 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average
common shares outstanding
|
|
|
34,563,073 |
|
|
|
26,491,211 |
|
|
|
31,338,963 |
|
|
|
24,930,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
See
accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.
NILE
THERAPEUTICS, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONDENSED
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
PERIOD
FROM AUGUST 1, 2005 (DATE OF INCEPTION) TO SEPTEMBER 30, 2010
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
ADDITIONAL
|
|
|
DEFICIT
ACCUMULATED
DURING
THE
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
|
|
COMMON
STOCK
|
|
|
PAID-IN
|
|
|
DEVELOPMENT
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS'
|
|
|
|
SHARES
|
|
|
AMOUNT
|
|
|
CAPITAL
|
|
|
STAGE
|
|
|
EQUITY
(DEFICIT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of common shares to founders
|
|
|
13,794,132 |
|
|
$ |
13,794 |
|
|
$ |
(8,794 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Founders
shares returned to treasury
|
|
|
(1,379,419 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(10,043 |
) |
|
|
(10,043 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
12,414,713 |
|
|
|
13,794 |
|
|
|
(8,794 |
) |
|
|
(10,043 |
) |
|
|
(5,043 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of common shares pursuant to licensing agreement
|
|
|
1,379,419 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
stock-based compensation
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(2,581,972 |
) |
|
|
(2,581,972 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
13,794,132 |
|
|
|
13,794 |
|
|
|
1,706 |
|
|
|
(2,592,015 |
) |
|
|
(2,576,515 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of common shares pursuant to licensing agreement
|
|
|
63,478 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
182,172 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
182,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of common shares pursuant to licensing agreement
|
|
|
350,107 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
999,650 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
shares sold in private placement, net of issuance costs of
$102,000
|
|
|
6,957,914 |
|
|
|
6,958 |
|
|
|
19,865,789 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
19,872,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
issued in connection with note conversion
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
288,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
288,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion
of notes payable upon event of merger
|
|
|
1,684,085 |
|
|
|
1,684 |
|
|
|
4,349,481 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,351,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note
discount arising from beneficial conversion feature
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
483,463 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
483,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reverse
merger transaction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elimination
of accumulated deficit
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(234,218 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(234,218 |
) |
Previously
issued SMI stock
|
|
|
1,250,000 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
232,968 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
234,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
stock-based compensation
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,899,123 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,899,123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-employee
stock-based compensaton
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,508 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,302,795 |
) |
|
|
(10,302,795 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
24,099,716 |
|
|
|
24,100 |
|
|
|
28,070,642 |
|
|
|
(12,894,810 |
) |
|
|
15,199,932 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
issued in satisfaction of accrued liabilities
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
334,992 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
334,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
stock-based compensation
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,436,603 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,436,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-employee
stock-based compensation
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
13,687 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
13,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of common shares pursuant to licensing agreement
|
|
|
49,689 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
249,950 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,131,596 |
) |
|
|
(13,131,596 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
24,149,405 |
|
|
|
24,150 |
|
|
|
31,105,874 |
|
|
|
(26,026,406 |
) |
|
|
5,103,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
stock-based compensation
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,772,597 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,772,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-employee
stock-based compensation
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
473,584 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
473,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units
sold in private placement, net of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
issuance
costs of $282,773
|
|
|
2,691,394 |
|
|
|
2,691 |
|
|
|
3,083,284 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,085,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
issued to placement agent in connection with private
placement
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
201,200 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
201,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
option and warrant exercises
|
|
|
245,025 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
217,228 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
217,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,872,297 |
) |
|
|
(7,872,297 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
27,085,824 |
|
|
|
27,086 |
|
|
|
36,853,767 |
|
|
|
(33,898,703 |
) |
|
|
2,982,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee
stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
972,417 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
972,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-employee
stock-based compensation
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
62,237 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
62,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units
sold in private placement, net of issuance costs of
$715,801
|
|
|
7,475,000 |
|
|
|
7,475 |
|
|
|
4,509,224 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,516,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
option and warrant exercises
|
|
|
68,970 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
6,138 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
6,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,235,834 |
) |
|
|
(5,235,834 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
34,629,794 |
|
|
$ |
34,630 |
|
|
$ |
42,403,783 |
|
|
$ |
(39,134,537 |
) |
|
$ |
3,303,876 |
|
See
accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.
NILE
THERAPEUTICS, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Period
from
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September
30,
|
|
|
August
1, 2005 (inception)
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
through
September 30, 2010
|
|
Cash
flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$ |
(5,235,834 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,306,578 |
) |
|
$ |
(39,134,537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
10,709 |
|
|
|
129,749 |
|
|
|
310,924 |
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
1,034,654 |
|
|
|
1,756,637 |
|
|
|
9,410,484 |
|
Write-off
of intangible assets
|
|
|
106,830 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
106,830 |
|
Warrants
issued in connection with note conversion
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
288,000 |
|
Note
discount arising from beneficial conversion feature
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
483,463 |
|
Loss
on disposal of assets
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
23,569 |
|
|
|
35,223 |
|
Noncash
interest expense
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
351,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(46,344 |
) |
|
|
213,141 |
|
|
|
(304,076 |
) |
Other
non-current assets
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(2,469 |
) |
|
|
(51,938 |
) |
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
440,925 |
|
|
|
(433,275 |
) |
|
|
591,553 |
|
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
435,185 |
|
|
|
(128,628 |
) |
|
|
837,957 |
|
Due
to related party
|
|
|
(8,916 |
) |
|
|
74,961 |
|
|
|
75,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(3,262,791 |
) |
|
|
(4,672,893 |
) |
|
|
(26,999,714 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(4,422 |
) |
|
|
(126,663 |
) |
Proceeds
from sale of assets
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
Cash
paid for intangible assets
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(32,561 |
) |
|
|
(345,591 |
) |
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(34,483 |
) |
|
|
(469,754 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from issuance of notes payable
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5,500,000 |
|
Repayment
of notes payable
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,500,000 |
) |
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options and warrants
|
|
|
6,207 |
|
|
|
143,594 |
|
|
|
223,680 |
|
Proceeds
from sale of common stock to founders
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
Proceeds
from sale of common stock in private placement
|
|
|
4,516,699 |
|
|
|
3,287,175 |
|
|
|
27,676,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
4,522,906 |
|
|
|
3,430,769 |
|
|
|
31,905,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
1,260,115 |
|
|
|
(1,276,607 |
) |
|
|
4,435,833 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
3,175,718 |
|
|
|
5,500,790 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
4,435,833 |
|
|
$ |
4,224,183 |
|
|
$ |
4,435,833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
schedule of cash flows information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid for interest
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
issued in sastisfaction of accrued liability
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
334,992 |
|
Warrants
issued to placement agent and investors, in connection with private
placement
|
|
$ |
1,765,300 |
|
|
$ |
2,872,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,765,300 |
|
Conversion
of notes payable and interest to common stock
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
4,351,165 |
|
Common
shares of SMI issued in reverse merger transaction
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,250 |
|
See
accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.
NILE
THERAPEUTICS, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES
TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September
30, 2010
(unaudited)
1.
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
Nile
Therapeutics, Inc. (“Nile” or the “Company”) develops innovative products for
the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Nile’s lead compound is CD-NP, a
chimeric natriuretic peptide currently in Phase II clinical studies for the
treatment of heart failure. The Company is also developing CU-NP, a pre-clinical
rationally designed natriuretic peptide that consists of amino acid chains
identical to those produced by the human body, specifically the ring structure
of C-type Natriuretic Peptide (“CNP”) and the N- and C-termini of Urodilatin
(“URO”).
The
Company was incorporated in the State of Nevada on June 17, 1996 and
reincorporated in Delaware on February 9, 2007, at which time its name was SMI
Products, Inc. (“SMI”). On September 17, 2007, the Company completed a merger
transaction whereby Nile Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a
wholly-owned subsidiary of SMI, merged with and into Nile Therapeutics, Inc., a
privately held Delaware corporation (“Old Nile”), with Old Nile becoming a
wholly-owned subsidiary of SMI. Immediately following the merger described
above, Old Nile was merged with and into the Company, with the Company remaining
as the surviving corporation to that merger. In connection with that short-form
merger, the Company changed its name to “Nile Therapeutics, Inc.” These two
merger transactions are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Merger.”
All costs incurred in connection with the Merger have been expensed. Upon
completion of the Merger, the Company adopted Old Nile’s business
plan.
2.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
The
Company is a development stage enterprise since it has not yet generated any
revenue from the sale of products and, through September 30, 2010, its efforts
have been principally devoted to developing its licensed technologies,
recruiting personnel, establishing office facilities, and raising capital.
Accordingly, the accompanying condensed financial statements have been prepared
in accordance with the provisions of ASC 915, “
Development Stage Entities.”
The Company’s condensed financial statements have been prepared on a going
concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement
of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The Company has
experienced net losses since its inception and has an accumulated deficit of
approximately $39.1 million at September 30, 2010. The Company expects to incur
substantial and increasing losses and to have negative net cash flows from
operating activities as it expands its technology portfolio and engages in
further research and development activities, particularly the conducting of
pre-clinical and clinical trials.
The
accompanying unaudited Condensed Financial Statements have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial
information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q adopted under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the
opinion of Nile’s management, the accompanying Condensed Financial Statements
contain all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals and
adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of
operations and cash flows of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated. The interim results for the period ended September 30, 2010 are not
necessarily indicative of results for the full 2010 fiscal year or any other
future interim periods. Because the Merger was accounted for as a reverse
acquisition under generally accepted accounting principles, the financial
statements for periods prior to September 17, 2007 reflect only the operations
of Old Nile.
These
unaudited Condensed Financial Statements have been prepared by management and
should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and notes thereto
included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires that management make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.
Estimates and assumptions principally relate to services performed by third
parties but not yet invoiced, estimates of the fair value and forfeiture rates
of stock options issued to employees and consultants, and estimates of the
probability and potential magnitude of contingent liabilities. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
Certain
reclassifications have been made to the prior year presentation to conform to
that of the current period.
NILE
THERAPEUTICS, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES
TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September
30, 2010
(unaudited)
3.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash
resources as of September 30, 2010 were approximately $4.4 million, compared to
$3.2 million as of December 31, 2009. Based on its resources at September 30,
2010, and the current plan of expenditure for continued development of the
Company’s current product candidates, the Company believes that it has
sufficient capital to fund its operations through the second half of 2011.
However, the Company will need to raise additional capital to complete the next
clinical study of CD-NP, which is expected to be a Phase IIb trial.
Additionally, the Company will need substantial additional financing in the
future until it can achieve profitability, if ever. The Company’s continued
operations will depend on its ability to raise additional funds through various
potential sources, such as equity and debt financing, or to license its product
candidates to another pharmaceutical company. The Company will continue to fund
operations from cash on hand and through sources of capital similar to those
previously described. The Company cannot assure that it will be able to secure
such additional financing, or if available, that it will be sufficient to meet
its needs.
The
success of the Company depends on its ability to discover and develop new
products to the point of FDA approval and subsequent revenue generation and,
accordingly, to raise enough capital to finance these developmental efforts.
Management plans to raise additional equity capital or license one or more of
its products to finance the continued operating and capital requirements of the
Company. Amounts raised will be used to further develop the Company’s product
candidates, acquire additional product licenses and for other working capital
purposes. While the Company will extend its best efforts to raise additional
capital to fund all operations for the next 12 to 24 months, management can
provide no assurances that the Company will be able to raise sufficient funds.
The accompanying condensed financial statements do not include any adjustments
that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
In
addition, to the extent that the Company raises additional funds by issuing
shares of its common stock or other securities convertible or exchangeable for
shares of common stock, stockholders may experience additional significant
dilution. In the event the Company raises additional capital through debt
financings, the Company may incur significant interest expense and become
subject to covenants in the related transaction documentation that may affect
the manner in which the Company conducts its business. To the extent that the
Company raises additional funds through collaboration and licensing
arrangements, it may be necessary to relinquish some rights to its technologies
or product candidates, or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to
the Company. These things may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s
business.
4.
BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE
Basic
loss per share is computed by dividing the loss available to common shareholders
by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted loss per
share is computed similarly to basic loss per share except that the denominator
is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have
been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued and if the
additional common shares were dilutive.
For all
periods presented, potentially dilutive securities are excluded from the
computation of fully diluted loss per share as their effect is
anti-dilutive.
Potentially
dilutive securities include:
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
Warrants
to purchase common stock
|
|
|
5,912,484 |
|
|
|
3,279,984 |
|
Options
to purchase common stock
|
|
|
7,632,529 |
|
|
|
5,264,644 |
|
Total
potentially dilutive securities
|
|
|
13,545,013 |
|
|
|
8,544,628 |
|
NILE
THERAPEUTICS, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES
TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September
30, 2010
(unaudited)
5.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Patents
During
the first quarter of 2010, the Company revised its estimate for the useful lives
of its patent and patent applications to zero. As a result of this change in
estimates, the Company recorded an impairment of $106,830 to research and
development expense, which was the net book value of its intangible assets as of
December 31, 2009. Management believes this revised estimate better reflects the
uncertainty surrounding drug product development. Management does not believe
that the change in this estimate will have a material impact on its financial
statements.
License
Agreements
CD-NP
On
January 20, 2006, the Company entered into an exclusive, worldwide,
royalty-bearing license agreement, or the CD-NP License Agreement, with Mayo
Foundation for Medical Education and Research (“Mayo”) for the rights to issued
patents, patent applications and know-how relating to the use of CD-NP in all
therapeutic indications. The Company was also entitled to rights to improvements
to CD-NP that arose out of the laboratory of Dr. John Burnett, the co-inventor
of CD-NP, until January 19, 2009.
Under the
terms of the CD-NP License Agreement, the Company agreed to make contingent cash
payments up to an aggregate of $31.9 million upon successful completion of
specified clinical and regulatory milestones relating to CD-NP. This aggregate
amount is subject to increase upon the receipt of regulatory approval for each
additional indication of CD-NP as well as for additional compounds or analogues
contained in the intellectual property.
In
addition to the potential milestone payments discussed above, the CD-NP License
Agreement requires the Company to issue shares of common stock to Mayo for an
equivalent dollar amount of grants received in excess of $300,000, but not to
exceed $575,000. For the period from August 1, 2005 (inception) through
September 30, 2010, the Company received $482,235 in grant income for which it
has issued to Mayo 63,478 shares (representing $182,236) of common
stock.
The CD-NP
License Agreement, unless earlier terminated, will continue in full force and
effect until January 20, 2026. However, to the extent any patent covered by the
license is issued with an expiration date beyond January 20, 2026, the term of
the agreement will continue until such expiration date. Mayo may terminate the
agreement earlier (i) for the Company’s material breach of the agreement that
remains uncured after 90 days’ written notice, (ii) the Company’s insolvency or
bankruptcy, or (iii) if the Company challenge the validity or enforceability of
any of the patents in any manner. The Company may terminate the agreement
without cause upon 90 days’ written notice.
CU-NP
On June
13, 2008, the Company entered into an exclusive, worldwide, royalty-bearing
license agreement, or the CU-NP License Agreement, with Mayo for the rights to
intellectual property and to develop commercially CU-NP for all therapeutic
indications. The Company also holds the rights to improvements to CU-NP that
arise out of the laboratory of Dr. John Burnett and Dr. Candace Lee, the
inventors of CU-NP, until June 12, 2011.
Under the
terms of the CU-NP License Agreement, the Company made an up-front cash payment
to Mayo and agreed to make future contingent cash payments up to an aggregate of
$24.3 million upon achievement of specific clinical and regulatory milestones
relating to CU-NP, including a milestone payment due in connection with the
initiation of the first Phase II clinical trial of the licensed product. This
aggregate amount of $24.3 million is subject to increase upon the receipt of
regulatory approval for each additional indication of CU-NP, as well as for
additional compounds or analogues contained in the intellectual property.
Pursuant to the agreement, the Company must also pay Mayo an annual maintenance
fee and a percentage of net sales of licensed products.
NILE
THERAPEUTICS, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES
TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September
30, 2010
(unaudited)
Payments
payable with pursuant to the CU-NP License Agreement, are recorded as research
and development expenses in the accompanying Condensed Statements of Operations.
Additionally, Dr. Burnett has applied for funding through Mayo’s
Discovery-Translation Program. In the event Dr. Burnett is awarded funding
through this program, and the funding is used for the development of the
licensed product based on the patent applications, the Company agreed to grant
to Mayo an equivalent dollar value in warrants to purchase shares of the
Company’s common stock. The number of shares purchasable under these warrants
will be calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the warrants
will include a cashless exercise provision with language to be negotiated in
good faith between the parties.
The CU-NP
License Agreement, unless earlier terminated, will continue in full force and
effect until June 13, 2028. However, to the extent any patent covered by the
license is issued with an expiration date beyond June 13, 2028, the term of the
agreement will continue until such expiration date. Mayo may terminate the
agreement earlier (i) for the Company’s material breach of the agreement that
remains uncured after 90 days written notice, (ii) the Company’s insolvency or
bankruptcy, (iii) if the Company challenge the validity or enforceability of any
of the patents in any manner, or (iv) or upon receipt of notice from the Company
that it has terminated all development efforts under the agreement. The Company
may terminate the agreement without cause upon 90 days’ written
notice.
6.
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(a)
Common Stock
On April
21, 2010, the Company entered into an underwriting agreement (the “Underwriting
Agreement”), providing for the offer and sale in a firm commitment underwritten
public offering (the “Offering”) of 6,500,000 units of its securities at a
public offering price of $0.70 per unit (less an underwriting discount of $0.063
per unit). The Offering closed on April 27, 2010. Pursuant to the Underwriting
Agreement, the Company granted the underwriters an option for a period of 45
days to purchase up to an additional 975,000 units to cover over-allotments. On
May 6, 2010, the underwriters exercised their option to purchase the maximum
amount of 975,000 over-allotment units. The sale of the over-allotment units
closed on May 10, 2010. Each unit sold in the Offering consisted of one share of
the Company’s common stock and 0.30 warrants to purchase common stock (the “Unit
Warrants”). Each whole Unit Warrant has a term of five years and represents the
right to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price
of $0.94 per share. The units separated immediately and the common stock and
Unit Warrants were issued separately. Among other terms and conditions of the
Unit Warrants, the agreement provides that, in the event the closing sale price
of the Company’s common stock is at least $3.00 per share for any 20 trading
days within a period of 30 consecutive trading days, the Company may call the
Unit Warrants for redemption, at a redemption price of $0.01 per Unit Warrant,
by providing at least 30 days notice to each Unit Warrant holder. The Unit
Warrants were approved for trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol
“NLTXW” and began trading on April 22, 2010.
In total,
the Company sold 7,475,000 units under the terms of the Underwriting Agreement,
consisting of an aggregate of 7,475,000 shares of common stock and 2,242,500
Unit Warrants. In addition, the Company issued the underwriters a five-year
warrant to purchase 390,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise
price of $0.94 per share, which had a fair value of $271,900 and was accounted
for as a cost of the offering and charged to stock holder’s equity.
The net
proceeds to the Company from the sale of all units, after deducting underwriting
discounts, commissions and professional fees of $715,801, was
$4,516,699.
In
connection with the Offering, certain of the Company’s officers, directors and
significant stockholders entered into 90-day “lock-up” agreements pursuant to
which such persons agreed not to sell or transfer shares of the Company’s common
stock owned by them, subject to customary exceptions.
On July
7, 2009, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain
qualified investors pursuant to which it agreed to sell 2,691,394 units of its
securities in a private placement in exchange for an aggregate gross purchase
price of $3,368,748. Each unit included one share of common stock and one
warrant to purchase a share of common stock. See Note 6(b). Issuance costs
related to the financing were $282,773, including the issuance of warrants
(“Placement Warrants”) to purchase 218,300 shares of common stock to designees
of Riverbank Capital Securities, Inc. (“Riverbank”), a FINRA member broker
dealer that acted as placement agent for the Company in connection with the
private placement. See Note 8. The issuance and sale of the units pursuant to
the Securities Purchase Agreement was completed on July 15, 2009.
NILE
THERAPEUTICS, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES
TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September
30, 2010
(unaudited)
The
Company agreed to file a registration statement with the SEC within 60 days in
order to register the resale of the shares of common stock, including shares of
common stock issuable pursuant to the exercise of warrants and Placement
Warrants, issued in the private placement. The Company filed such registration
statement with the SEC on August 13, 2009.
(b)
Warrants
In
connection with the April 2010 Offering discussed above, the Company issued a
total of 2,242,500 Unit Warrants, each of which has a term of five years and
represents the right to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock at an
exercise price of $0.94 per share. In addition, the Company issued the
underwriters a five-year warrant to purchase 390,000 shares of the Company’s
common stock at an exercise price of $0.94 per share.
In
connection with its July 2009 private placement, as discussed above, the Company
issued 2,691,394 shares of common stock and five-year warrants to purchase an
additional 2,691,394 shares of common stock. The warrants were issued in three
separate tranches, as follows:
|
·
|
Warrants
to purchase 672,849 shares, representing 25% of the total warrant shares
issued to investors, have an exercise price equal to $1.25, which
represents 110% of the $1.14 consolidated closing bid price of the
Company’s common stock on July 7, 2009 (the “Closing Bid
Price”);
|
|
·
|
Warrants
to purchase 672,848 shares, representing 25% of the total warrant shares
issued to investors, have an exercise price equal to $1.71, which
represents 150% of the Closing Bid Price;
and
|
|
·
|
Warrants
to purchase 1,345,697 shares, representing 50% of the total warrant shares
issued to investors, have an exercise price equal to $2.28, which
represents 200% of the Closing Bid
Price.
|
The
warrants issued to investors in the July 2009 private placement are redeemable
by the Company upon 30 days’ notice if at any time the volume weighted average
price of the common shares for any 20 consecutive business days is equal to or
greater than 200% of the applicable exercise price of each warrant.
As
consideration for its services as placement agent in connection with the July
2009 private placement, the Company also issued to designees of Riverbank
five-year warrants to purchase 218,300 shares of common stock at a price of
$1.375 per share, which is equal to 110% of the per unit purchase price paid by
investors, and which warrants have a cashless (net) exercise provision. See Note
8.
Below is
a table that summarizes all outstanding warrants to purchase shares of the
Company’s common stock as of September 30, 2010.
Grant
Date
|
|
Warrants
Issued
|
|
|
Exercise
Price
Range
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
Expiration
Date
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
Warrants
Outstanding
|
|
9/11/2007
|
|
|
168,377 |
|
|
|
2.71 |
|
|
$ |
2.71 |
|
9/11/2012
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
168,377 |
|
3/26/2008
|
|
|
206,912 |
|
|
|
2.71 |
|
|
$ |
2.71 |
|
9/11/2012
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
206,912 |
|
7/15/2009
|
|
|
2,909,695 |
|
|
|
1.25-2.28 |
|
|
$ |
1.84 |
|
7/14/2014
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
2,904,695 |
|
4/21/2010
|
|
|
2,632,500 |
|
|
|
0.94 |
|
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
4/20/2015
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,632,500 |
|
|
|
|
5,917,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
5,912,484 |
|
7.
STOCK OPTION PLAN
The
Company’s Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) was initially
adopted by the Board of Directors on August 10, 2005. The Plan authorized a
total of 2,000,000 shares of common stock for issuance. On September 17, 2007,
pursuant to the Merger, the Plan was amended and each share of common stock then
subject to the Plan was substituted with 2.758838 shares of common stock,
resulting in an aggregate of 5,517,676 shares available under the Plan. On July
26, 2010, the Company’s stockholders approved an amendment to the Plan
increasing the total number of shares authorized for issuance thereunder to
9,500,000, which was an increase of 3,982,324 shares to the Plan. Under the
Plan, incentives may be granted to officers, employees, directors, consultants,
and advisors. Incentives under the Plan may be granted in any one or a
combination of the following forms: (a) incentive stock options and
non-statutory stock options, (b) stock appreciation rights, (c) stock awards,
(d) restricted stock and (e) performance shares.
NILE
THERAPEUTICS, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES
TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September
30, 2010
(unaudited)
The Plan
is administered by the Board of Directors, or a committee appointed by the
Board, which determines the recipients and types of awards to be granted, as
well as the number of shares subject to the awards, the exercise price and the
vesting schedule. The term of stock options granted under the Plan cannot exceed
ten years. Currently, stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to
closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant, and generally
vest over a period of one to four years.
During
the three months ended September 30, 2010, the Company granted options to
purchase 1,900,000 shares to current employees, 600,000 shares to members of the
Board of Directors, 250,000 shares to consultants and 50,000 shares to a new
member of the Company’s Scientific Advisory Board. The granted options had
vesting terms between immediate and 3 years with exercise prices between $0.30
and $0.68.
For the
three months ended September 30, 2010, the Company estimated the fair value of
each option award granted to employees using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model. The following assumptions were used for the three months ended September
30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
Expected
volatility
|
|
90%
to 98%
|
|
|
117%
to 123%
|
|
Expected
term
|
|
3
years
|
|
|
3
years
|
|
Dividend
yield
|
|
0%
|
|
|
0%
|
|
Risk-free
interest rates
|
|
0.9%
to 1%
|
|
|
1.4%
|
|
A summary
of the status of the options issued under the Plan at September 30, 2010, and
information with respect to the changes in options outstanding is as
follows:
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Available for
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Balance
at January 1, 2010
|
|
|
836,249 |
|
|
|
4,441,402 |
|
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
|
|
Shares
authorized for issuance
|
|
|
3,982,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
granted under the Plan
|
|
|
(2,800,000 |
) |
|
|
2,800,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
|
|
Options
exercised
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(68,970 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
Options
forfeited
|
|
|
133,653 |
|
|
|
(133,653 |
) |
|
$ |
1.87 |
|
|
|
|
Balance
at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
2,152,226 |
|
|
|
7,038,779 |
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable
at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,480,719 |
|
|
$ |
1.94 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
The
following table summarizes information about stock options issued under the Plan
and outstanding at September 30, 2010:
NILE
THERAPEUTICS, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES
TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September
30, 2010
(unaudited)
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Range of
Exercise
Prices
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Total
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
$0.09
to $0.93
|
|
|
3,915,343 |
|
|
|
8.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
|
1,740,343 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
$1.14
to $2.71
|
|
|
2,487,087 |
|
|
|
5.85 |
|
|
$ |
2.33 |
|
|
|
2,276,253 |
|
|
$ |
2.41 |
|
$4.45
to $5.75
|
|
|
636,349 |
|
|
|
6.86 |
|
|
$ |
4.54 |
|
|
|
464,123 |
|
|
$ |
4.56 |
|
Total
|
|
|
7,038,779 |
|
|
|
7.16 |
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
|
|
4,480,719 |
|
|
$ |
1.94 |
|
Share-based compensation
is recognized only for those awards that are ultimately expected to vest,
therefore, the Company has applied an estimated forfeiture rate to unvested
awards for the purpose of calculating compensation cost. These estimates will be
revised, if necessary, in future periods if actual forfeitures differ from
estimates. Changes in forfeiture estimates impact compensation cost in the
period in which the change in estimate occurs.
In the
quarter ending March 31, 2009, with two years of employee performance and
forfeiture history, the Company began to estimate forfeitures of
performance-based stock options. Prior to December 31, 2008, the Company did not
include an estimate for forfeitures in our compensation expenses on a quarterly
basis. Instead, adjustments to the performance-based stock compensation expense
for the full year were made in the fourth quarter at the time of performance
assessment.
Employee
stock-based compensation costs for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009 and for the cumulative period from August 1, 2005 (inception)
through September 30, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
from
|
|
|
|
Three
months ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine
months ended September 30,
|
|
|
August
1, 2005 (inception)
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
through
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
and administrative
|
|
$ |
248,886 |
|
|
$ |
433,213 |
|
|
$ |
731,146 |
|
|
$ |
1,193,413 |
|
|
$ |
6,092,134 |
|
Research
and development
|
|
|
83,858 |
|
|
|
112,158 |
|
|
|
231,809 |
|
|
|
94,617 |
|
|
|
992,817 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
332,744 |
|
|
$ |
545,371 |
|
|
$ |
962,955 |
|
|
$ |
1,288,030 |
|
|
$ |
7,084,951 |
|
The fair
value of shares vested to employees (including directors) under the Plan for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 and for the period from
August 1, 2005 (inception) through September 30, 2010 were $907,271, $
1,425,226, $466,301, $2,284,390, and $6,024,189 respectively. These
amounts were included in research and development and general and administrative
expenses in the accompanying Condensed Statements of Operations.
Certain
employees have been granted performance-based stock options that are subject to
forfeiture based on the failure to achieve specified goals. The Company analyzed
two years of annual performance measurements, and, based on that analysis,
subsequent to March 31, 2009, decided to estimate forfeiture rates on
performance-based stock options for future periods. For the cumulative period
from August 1, 2005 (inception) through September 30, 2010, employees forfeited
379,617 shares related to performance-based options, which had a fair value of
$643,094. Based on these forfeiture rates, the Company estimates that an
additional 13,682 options will be forfeited in the future. This estimated
compensation cost of these forfeited shares is $46,120.
At
September 30, 2010, total unrecognized estimated employee (including directors)
compensation cost related to stock options granted prior to that date was
$1,195,936, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average vesting
period of 2.0 years. This unrecognized estimated employee compensation cost
includes the $46,120 in management estimated forfeitures of performance-based
stock options.
NILE
THERAPEUTICS, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES
TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September
30, 2010
(unaudited)
Common
stock, stock options or other equity instruments issued to non-employees
(including consultants and all members of the Company’s Scientific Advisory
Board) as consideration for goods or services received by the Company are
accounted for based on the fair value of the equity instruments issued (unless
the fair value of the consideration received can be more reliably measured). The
fair value of stock options is determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model and is periodically remeasured as the underlying options vest. The fair
value of any options issued to non-employees is recorded as expense over the
applicable service periods.
On June
24, 2009, in conjunction with a services agreement, the Company issued to named
employees of Two River Consulting, LLC (“TRC”) stock options to purchase 187,500
shares of common stock that vested on issuance and have a fair value of
$116,309; and stock options to purchase 562,500 shares that vest based on the
achievement of certain milestones and have a total estimated fair value of
$335,856, as of September 30, 2010. TRC is an entity controlled by two of the
Company’s officers and directors. For the three months ended September 30, 2010,
the Company recorded an expense of $66,492 related to these options and will
record additional expense in the future as the remaining options are expected to
vest.
On August
12, 2010, in conjunction with an amended services agreement, the Company issued
to named employees of TRC stock options to purchase 250,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock that where fully vested on issuance and had an estimated
fair value of $82,200.
Stock-based
compensation costs incurred for services by non-employees for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, and for the cumulative period from
August 1, 2005 (inception) through September 30, 2010 totaled $45,969, $62,237,
$ 222,483, $350,856 and $ 552,196, respectively. These amounts were included in
research and development and administrative expenses in the accompanying
Condensed Statements of Operations.
8. RELATED
PARTIES
On June
24, 2009, the Company entered into a Services Agreement (the “Services
Agreement”) with TRC to provide various clinical development, operational and
administrative services to the Company for a period of one year. Joshua A.
Kazam, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and director, and
Arie S. Belldegrun, who was appointed to serve as a member of the Company’s
Board of Directors on September 24, 2009, are each partners of TRC. David M.
Tanen, who served as the Company’s Secretary and director until his resignation
from both positions on September 24, 2009, is also a partner of TRC. The terms
of the Services Agreement were reviewed and approved by a special committee of
the Company’s Board of Directors consisting of independent directors. None of
the members of the special committee has any interest in TRC or the Services
Agreement. As compensation for the services contemplated by the Services
Agreement, the Company agreed to pay to TRC a monthly cash fee of $65,000 and
issued stock options to purchase up to an aggregate of 750,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock at a price per share equal to $0.89, the closing sale
price of the Company’s common stock on June 24, 2009. The total estimated fair
value of the stock options is $469,472. Twenty-five percent of the shares
subject to the stock option vested immediately and the remaining 75% vest
pursuant to the achievement of certain milestones relating to the clinical
development of CD-NP. As of September 30, 2010, 506,250 options have vested,
56,250 options were forfeit, and 187,500 options vest pursuant to the
achievement of certain milestones. On occasion, some of the Company’s expenses
are paid by TRC. No interest is charged by TRC on any outstanding balance owed
by the Company. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
and for the period from August 1, 2005 (inception) through September 30, 2010,
total cash services and reimbursed expenses totaled $205,239, $619,602,
$203,685, $268,685 and $1,102,442, respectively. As of September 30, 2010 the
Company has a payable to TRC of $75,238.
On August
12, 2010, the Company and TRC entered into an amendment to the Services
Agreement (the “Amendment”), pursuant to which the term of the Services
Agreement was extended and shall continue on a month-to-month basis until
otherwise terminated by one of the parties. The Amendment further provides that
the Company may terminate the Services Agreement upon 30 days’ written notice.
The Company agreed to continue to pay TRC a monthly cash fee of $65,000 and to
issue stock options to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at
a price equal to $0.38, the closing sale price of the Company’s common stock on
August 12, 2010. The stock options fully vested upon issuance and have a total
estimated fair value of $82,200. The terms of the Amendment were reviewed and
approved by a special committee of the Company’s Board of Directors consisting
of disinterested, independent directors.
NILE
THERAPEUTICS, INC.
(A
DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
NOTES
TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September
30, 2010
(unaudited)
As
discussed in Notes 6(a) and 6(b), pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement
dated July 7, 2009 between the Company and certain qualified investors
identified therein, the Company engaged Riverbank to serve as its placement
agent. Riverbank was not paid a cash commission for its services, however, the
Company issued to designees of Riverbank five-year warrants to purchase 218,300
shares of the Company’s common stock with an aggregate fair value of $201,200
and an expense allowance of $50,000 to cover expenses incurred during the
financing. These costs were incurred in connection with the private placement of
units resulting in a charge to stockholder’s equity.
Peter M.
Kash, a director of the Company, Joshua A. Kazam, the Company’s President and
Chief Executive Officer and director, and David M. Tanen, a director of the
Company until September 24, 2009, are each officers of and collectively control
Riverbank. In light of the relationship between Messrs. Kash, Kazam and Tanen
and Riverbank, the selection and terms of the engagement were reviewed and
approved by a special committee of the Company’s Board consisting of independent
directors, none of whom had any interest or other relationship in Riverbank or
its affiliates.
9.
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On
November 1, 2010, the Company was notified that it was awarded a $244,479 grant
under the Therapeutic Discovery Tax Credit program that was created as part of
the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010. This program was
designed to provide a tax credit or grant of up to 50% of eligible costs and
expenses for the tax years of 2009 and 2010 for qualifying research and
development expenses incurred for innovative projects that are determined by the
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to have reasonable potential to
result in a new therapy, reduce health care costs, or represent a significant
advance in finding a cure for human disease. The grant awarded to the Company
related to its R&D expenditures incurred in connection with its CD-NP
program. The Company expects to receive the funds granted prior to the end of
2010.
On
November 2, 2010, the Company released top-line data from an open-label,
single-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2 study of 77 patients with acute
decompensated heart failure, or ADHF. The primary objective of the study was to
assess the safety and tolerability of CD-NP in a renally compromised ADHF
population, the intended population of the therapy. Secondary endpoints included
several assessments of drug activity. CD-NP infusion at 1.25 and 2.5 ng/kg/min
appeared to be well tolerated. A dose-dependent effect on blood pressure was
observed, with minimal or mild blood pressure reduction at 1.25 and 2.5
ng/kg/min, and moderate blood pressure reduction at 3.75 ng/kg/min. Dose
escalation was limited by significant blood pressure reduction at 5 ng/kg/min.
Secondary and exploratory analyses demonstrated favorable effects of CD-NP on
renal function, particularly at the 1.25 and 2.5 ng/kg/min doses. At these
doses, CD-NP appeared to preserve or enhance renal function compared to placebo,
as evidenced by favorable trends in several biomarkers correlated with kidney
function or kidney injury, including creatinine, and cystatin-c.
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
Overview
We are a
development stage biopharmaceutical company in the business of commercially
developing innovative products for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. We
currently have rights to develop and commercialize two product candidates,
described as follows:
|
·
|
CD-NP–
Our lead compound is CD-NP, a chimeric natriuretic peptide currently in
Phase II clinical studies for the treatment of heart failure. We believe
CD-NP may be useful in several cardiovascular and renal indications. We
are currently developing CD-NP for an initial indication of acute
decompensated heart failure, or ADHF. In June 2010, we completed dosing of
a 77 patient, open-label Phase II study of CD-NP in patients with ADHF and
mild to moderate renal dysfunction. CD-NP infusion at 1.25, 2.5 and 3.75
ng/kg/min appeared to be well tolerated. A dose-related effect on blood
pressure was observed, with minimal or mild blood pressure reduction at
1.25 and 2.5 ng/kg/min, and moderate blood pressure reduction at 3.75
ng/kg/min. Dose escalation was limited by significant blood pressure
reduction at 5 ng/kg/min. Secondary and exploratory analyses demonstrated
favorable effects of CD-NP on renal function, particularly at the 1.25 and
2.5 ng/kg/min doses. At these doses, CD-NP appeared to preserve or enhance
renal function compared to placebo, as evidenced by favorable trends in
several biomarkers correlated with kidney function, including creatinine
and cystatin-c. Our next steps in the development of CD-NP as therapy for
acute heart failure are to finalize the design of a double-blind, placebo
controlled Phase IIb study and to discuss that trial design with the FDA
and other regulatory authorities. If the FDA approves the design and
end-points of our next protocol, we may then initiate a larger Phase IIb
clinical trial in 2011, which will require significant additional capital
beyond our current resources to
fund.
|
|
·
|
CU-NP–
We are also developing CU-NP, a pre-clinical rationally designed
natriuretic peptide that consists of amino acid chains identical to those
produced by the human body, specifically the ring structure of C-type
natriuretic peptide, or CNP, and the N- and C-termini of Urodilatin, or
URO. In 2009, in partnership with the Mayo Clinic, we progressed toward
the development of formulations to enable the chronic administration of
CU-NP. Based on our current development plans for CU-NP, we anticipate
that we will expend a minimal amount on external development costs until
we have obtained significant additional
capital.
|
We have
no product sales to date and we will not generate any product revenue until we
receive approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, or
equivalent foreign regulatory bodies to begin selling our pharmaceutical product
candidates. Developing pharmaceutical products is a lengthy and very expensive
process. Assuming we do not encounter any unforeseen safety issues during the
course of developing our product candidates, we do not expect to complete the
development of a product candidate for several years, if ever. To date, most of
our development expenses have related to our lead product candidate, CD-NP. As
we proceed with the clinical development of CD-NP and as we further develop
CU-NP, our second product candidate, our research and development expenses will
further increase. To the extent we are successful in acquiring additional
product candidates for our development pipeline, our need to finance further
research and development will continue increasing. Accordingly, our success
depends not only on the safety and efficacy of our product candidates, but also
on our ability to finance the development of the products. Our major sources of
working capital have been proceeds from private and public sales of our common
stock, and debt financings.
Research
and development, or R&D, expenses consist primarily of salaries and related
personnel costs, fees paid to consultants and outside service providers for
pre-clinical, clinical, and manufacturing development, legal expenses resulting
from intellectual property prosecution, contractual review, and other expenses
relating to the design, development, testing, and enhancement of our product
candidates. We expense our R&D costs as they are incurred.
General
and administrative, or G&A, expenses consist primarily of salaries and
related expenses for executive, finance and other administrative personnel,
personnel recruiting fees, accounting, legal and other professional fees,
business development expenses, rent, business insurance and other corporate
expenses.
Our
results include non-cash compensation expense as a result of the issuance of
stock, stock options, and warrants. We expense the fair value of stock options
and warrants over the vesting period. When more precise pricing data is
unavailable, we determine the fair value of stock options using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The terms and vesting schedules for
share-based awards vary by type of grant and the employment status of the
grantee. Generally, the awards vest based upon time-based or performance-based
conditions. Performance-based conditions generally include the attainment of
goals related to our financial performance and product development. Stock-based
compensation expense is included in the respective categories of expense in the
statements of operations. We expect to record additional non-cash compensation
expense in the future, which may be significant.
Results
of Operations
General and Administrative
Expenses. G&A expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2010
and 2009 were approximately $0.7 million and $0.9 million, respectively. This
decrease of approximately $0.2 million was due to a reduction in stock option
expense and in occupancy expenses.
G&A
expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 were
approximately $1.7 million and $2.7 million, respectively. The decrease of
approximately $1.0 million over 2009 is primarily due to the accelerated vesting
of stock options and severance payment made pursuant to a separation agreement
with a former executive during June of 2009, a reduction in employee payroll
costs, which was offset by an increase in consulting fees for management
services, and a reduction in occupancy expenses.
Research and Development
Expenses. For both of the three month periods ended September 30, 2010
and June 30, 2009, R&D expenses were approximately $1.1 million. R&D
expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were approximately $3.5
million, a decrease of approximately $0.1 million from the same period in 2009.
We experienced increased R&D costs relating to clinical trial activities for
CD-NP for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to
the corresponding periods of 2009; however, such increases were offset primarily
by decreased manufacturing costs for CD-NP compared to the 2009 periods. Also,
employee payroll costs decreased from 2009 due to staff reductions, but this was
mostly offset by increased consulting costs and stock compensation
costs.
CD-NP. Although the
development of CD-NP is still in its early stages, we believe that it has
potential applications to treat heart failure. We expect to spend an additional
$0.2-$0.3 million in external development costs in fiscal 2010 in order to
complete the analysis of the Phase II clinical trial and submit the data package
to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). If the FDA approves the design and
end-points of our next protocol, we may then initiate a larger Phase IIb
clinical trial in 2011, which will require significant additional capital beyond
our current resources to fund.
CU-NP. Since acquiring our
rights to CU-NP in June 2008, we have incurred total research and development
expenses of approximately $0.6 million through September 30, 2010. CU-NP has
only undergone preclinical studies and has yet to be studied in humans. Based on
our current development plans for CU-NP, we anticipate that we will expend a
minimal amount on external development costs until we have obtained significant
additional capital.
Our
expenditures on current and future clinical development programs, particularly
our CD-NP program, are expected to be substantial, particularly in relation to
our available capital resources, and to increase. However, these planned
expenditures are subject to many uncertainties, including the results of
clinical trials and whether we develop any of our drug candidates with a partner
or independently. As a result of such uncertainties, we cannot predict with any
significant degree of certainty the duration and completion costs of our
research and development projects or whether, when and to what extent we will
generate revenues from the commercialization and sale of any of our product
candidates. The duration and cost of clinical trials may vary significantly over
the life of a project as a result of unanticipated events arising during
clinical development and a variety of factors, including:
|
·
|
the
number of trials and studies in a clinical
program;
|
|
·
|
the
number of patients who participate in the
trials;
|
|
·
|
the
number of sites included in the
trials;
|
|
·
|
the
rates of patient recruitment and
enrollment;
|
|
·
|
the
duration of patient treatment and
follow-up;
|
|
·
|
the
costs of manufacturing our drug candidates;
and
|
|
·
|
the
costs, requirements, timing of, and the ability to secure regulatory
approvals.
|
Interest Income. Interest
income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was
$5,954, $17,526, $15,194 and $35,767, respectively. This decrease in interest
income over 2009 is due to lower interest rates earned on cash in bank accounts,
and lower average cash balances in 2010 than 2009 levels.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
The
following table summarizes our liquidity and capital resources as of September
30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and our net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (the amounts stated are
expressed in thousands):
Liquidity and capital resources
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
December 31,2009
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
4,436 |
|
|
$ |
3,176 |
|
Working
Capital
|
|
$ |
3,235 |
|
|
$ |
2,796 |
|
Stockholders'
equity
|
|
$ |
3,304 |
|
|
$ |
2,982 |
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30,
|
|
Cash
flow data
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Cash
provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
activities
|
|
$ |
(3,263 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,673 |
) |
Investing
activities
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
Financing
activities
|
|
|
4,523 |
|
|
|
3,431 |
|
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
1,260 |
|
|
$ |
(1,276 |
) |
Our total
cash resources as of September 30, 2010 were $4.4 million compared to $3.2
million as of December 31, 2009. As of September 30, 2010, we had approximately
$1.5 million in liabilities, and $3.2 million in net working capital. We
incurred a net loss of $5.2 million and had negative cash flow from operating
activities of $3.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Since
August 1, 2005 (inception) through September 30, 2010, we have incurred an
aggregate net loss of approximately $39.1 million, while negative cash flow from
operating activities has amounted to $27.0 million. As we continue to develop
our product candidates, we expect to continue to incur substantial and
increasing losses, which will continue to generate negative net cash flows from
operating activities as we expand our technology portfolio and engage in further
research and development activities, particularly the conducting of pre-clinical
studies and clinical trials.
From
inception through September 30, 2010, we have financed our operations through
public and private sales of our equity and debt securities. As we have not
generated any revenue from operations to date, and we do not expect to generate
revenue for several years, if ever, we will need to raise substantial additional
capital in order to continue to fund our research and development, including our
long-term plans for clinical trials and new product development, as well as to
fund operations generally. We may seek to raise additional funds through various
potential sources, such as equity and debt financings, or through strategic
collaborations and license agreements. We can give no assurances that we will be
able to secure such additional sources of funds to support or operations, or if
such funds are available to us, that such additional financing will be
sufficient to meet our needs.
Based on
our resources at September 30, 2010, we believe that we have sufficient capital
to fund our operations through the second half of 2011. However, we will
need substantial additional capital in order to initiate and fund the next
clinical study of CD-NP, which is expected to be a Phase IIb clinical trial. Our
actual cash requirements may vary materially from those now planned, however,
because of a number of factors, including the changes in the focus and direction
of our research and development programs, including the acquisition and pursuit
of development of new product candidates; competitive and technical advances;
costs of commercializing any of the product candidates; and costs of filing,
prosecuting, defending and enforcing any patent claims and any other
intellectual property rights. If we are unable to raise additional funds when
needed, we may not be able to market our products as planned or continue
development and regulatory approval of our products, we could be required to
delay, scale back or eliminate some or all our research and development programs
and we may need to wind down our operations altogether. Each of these
alternatives would likely have a material adverse effect on our
business.
Our forecasted average monthly cash expenditures for the next six months are
approximately $0.3 million, which is less than our average monthly expenses from
the previous six months. While not actively enrolling a clinical study, our
research and development expenses are reduced. Following the completion of our
Phase II study, we will need substantial additional capital, whether from a
financing or a strategic partnership, in order to initiate and complete the next
clinical study of CD-NP.
The
actual amount of funds we will need to operate is subject to many factors, some
of which are beyond our control. These factors include the
following:
|
·
|
the
progress of our research
activities;
|
|
·
|
the
number and scope of our research
programs;
|
|
·
|
the
progress of our pre-clinical and clinical development
activities;
|
|
·
|
the
progress of the development efforts of parties with whom we have entered
into research and development
agreements;
|
|
·
|
our
ability to maintain current research and development programs and to
establish new research and development and licensing arrangements;
and
|
|
·
|
the
cost involved in prosecuting and enforcing patent claims and other
intellectual property rights; and the cost and timing of regulatory
approvals.
|
We have
based our estimates on assumptions that may prove to be wrong. We may need to
obtain additional funds sooner than planned or in greater amounts than we
currently anticipate. Potential sources of financing include strategic
relationships, public or private sales of equity or debt and other sources. We
may seek to access the public or private equity markets when conditions are
favorable due to our long-term capital requirements. We do not have any
committed sources of financing at this time, and it is uncertain whether
additional funding will be available when we need it on terms that will be
acceptable to us, or at all. If we raise funds by selling additional shares of
common stock or other securities convertible into common stock, the ownership
interests of our existing stockholders will be diluted. If we are not able to
obtain financing when needed, we may be unable to carry out our business plan.
As a result, we may have to significantly limit our operations and our business,
financial condition and results of operations would be materially harmed. In
such an event, we will be required to undertake a thorough review of our
programs and the opportunities presented by such programs and allocate our
resources in the manner most prudent.
To the
extent that we raise additional funds by issuing equity or convertible or
non-convertible debt securities, our stockholders may experience additional
significant dilution and such financing may involve restrictive covenants. To
the extent that we raise additional funds through collaboration and licensing
arrangements, it may be necessary to relinquish some rights to our technologies
or our product candidates, or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable
to us. These things may have a material adverse effect on our
business.
The
continuation of our business beyond the end of 2011 is dependent upon
obtaining further long-term financing, the successful development of our drug
product candidates and related technologies, the successful and sufficient
market acceptance of any product offerings that we may introduce, and, finally,
the achievement of a profitable level of operations. The issuance of additional
equity securities by us may result in a significant dilution in the equity
interests of current stockholders. Obtaining commercial loans, assuming those
loans would be available, on acceptable terms or even at all, will increase our
liabilities and future cash commitments.
Financing
Activities
April 2010 Financing. On
April 21, 2010, we sold, in an underwritten public offering, a total of
6,500,000 units of our securities at a public offering price of $0.70 per unit.
Each unit contained one share of common stock and 0.30 warrants to purchase
common stock, each whole warrant representing the right to purchase one share of
common stock at an exercise price of $0.94 per share. We may call the warrants
for redemption upon 30 days notice if the price of our common stock is at least
$3.00 per share for any 20 trading days within a period of 30 consecutive
trading days. The units separated immediately and the common stock and warrants
were issued separately. The warrants are approved for trading on the Nasdaq
Capital Market under the symbol “NLTXW” and began trading on April 22, 2010. The
sale of these 6,500,000 units closed on April 27, 2010. Pursuant to the terms of
the underwriting agreement, we granted the underwriters an option for a period
of 45 days to purchase up to an additional 975,000 units to cover
over-allotments, if any. We also issued the underwriters a five-year warrant to
purchase 390,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.94 per
share. On May 6, 2010, the underwriters exercised their option to purchase the
maximum amount of 975,000 over-allotment units. The sale of the over-allotment
units closed on May 10, 2010. The net proceeds to us from the sale of the units,
after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions, was approximately $4.5
million when including the proceeds from the sale of the 975,000 over-allotment
units.
July 2009 Financing. On July
7, 2009, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with various accredited
investors pursuant to which we agreed to sell in a private placement an
aggregate of 2,691,394 shares of our common stock and five-year warrants to
purchase an equal number of additional shares of common stock. The purchase
price for each unit of one share of common stock and one warrant was $1.25. The
sale of the shares and warrants resulted in aggregate gross proceeds of
approximately $3.37 million, before deducting expenses. The issuance and sale of
the units pursuant to the securities purchase agreement was completed on July
15, 2009.
In
accordance with the terms of the securities purchase agreement, the warrants
issued to the investors are evidenced by three separate certificates, which
collectively represented at issuance the right to purchase a number of shares of
common stock equal to the number of shares purchased by such investor in the
private placement, as follows:
|
·
|
A
warrant representing the right to purchase 25% of the warrant shares at an
exercise price equal to $1.25, which represented 110% of the $1.14
consolidated closing bid price of our common stock on the date of the
securities purchase agreement;
|
|
·
|
A
warrant representing the right to purchase 25% of the warrant shares at an
exercise price equal to $1.71, which represented 150% of the closing bid
price of our common stock on the date of the securities purchase
agreement; and
|
|
·
|
A
warrant representing the right to purchase 50% of the warrant shares at an
exercise price equal to $2.28, which represented 200% of the closing bid
price of our common stock on the date of the securities purchase
agreement.
|
These
warrants are redeemable by us, at a redemption price of $0.001 per warrant
share, upon 30 days’ notice, if at any time, the volume weighted average price
of our common stock for any 20 consecutive business days is equal to or greater
than 200% of the then applicable exercise price of the warrants.
Issuance
costs related to the financing were $282,773, including the issuance of warrants
to purchase 218,300 shares of common stock to designees of Riverbank Capital
Securities, Inc., or Riverbank, which served as our placement agent in
connection with the private placement. Certain of our officers and directors are
principals of Riverbank.
License
Agreement Commitments
CD-NP
License Agreement
Pursuant
to our license agreement with Mayo for CD-NP, in July 2008 we made a milestone
payment of $400,000 to Mayo upon the dosing of the first patient in a Phase II
trial. Subsequent milestones achieved will require us to make additional
milestone payments to Mayo. We agreed to make contingent cash payments up to an
aggregate of $31.9 million upon successful completion of specified clinical and
regulatory milestones relating to CD-NP. This aggregate amount is subject to
increase upon the receipt of regulatory approval for each additional indication
of CD-NP as well as for additional compounds or analogues contained in the
intellectual property.
The CD-NP
license agreement, unless earlier terminated, will continue in full force and
effect until January 20, 2026. However, to the extent any patent covered by the
license is issued with an expiration date beyond January 20, 2026, the term of
the agreement will continue until such expiration date. Mayo may terminate the
agreement earlier (i) for our material breach of the agreement that remains
uncured after 90 days’ written notice to us, (ii) our insolvency or bankruptcy,
or (iii) if we challenge the validity or enforceability of any of the patents in
any manner. We may terminate the agreement without cause upon 90 days’ written
notice.
CU-NP
License Agreement
On June
13, 2008, we entered into a second license agreement with Mayo pursuant to which
we acquired the rights to CU-NP. Under the terms of the agreement, Mayo granted
to us a worldwide, exclusive license for the rights to commercially develop
CU-NP for all therapeutic indications. We also have the rights to improvements
to CU-NP and know-how that arise out of the laboratory of Dr. John Burnett and
Dr. Candace Lee, the inventors of CU-NP and employees of the Mayo Clinic, until
June 12, 2011.
Under the
terms of the CU-NP license agreement, we made an up-front cash payment to Mayo
and agreed to make future contingent cash payments up to an aggregate of $24.3
million upon achievement of specific clinical and regulatory milestones relating
to CU-NP, including a milestone payment due in connection with the initiation of
the first Phase II clinical trial of the licensed product. This aggregate amount
of $24.3 million is subject to increase upon the receipt of regulatory approval
for each additional indication of CU-NP, as well as for additional compounds or
analogues contained in the intellectual property. Pursuant to the agreement, we
must also pay Mayo an annual maintenance fee and a percentage of net sales of
licensed products.
The CU-NP
License Agreement, unless earlier terminated, will continue in full force and
effect until June 13, 2028. However, to the extent any patent covered by the
license is issued with an expiration date beyond June 13, 2028, the term of the
agreement will continue until such expiration date. Mayo may terminate the
agreement earlier (i) for our material breach of the agreement that remains
uncured after 90 days’ written notice to us, (ii) our insolvency or bankruptcy,
(iii) if we challenge the validity or enforceability of any of the patents in
any manner, or (iv) or upon receipt of notice from the Company that we have
terminated all development efforts under the agreement. We may terminate the
agreement without cause upon 90 days’ written notice.
Off
-Balance Sheet Arrangements
There
were no off-balance sheet arrangements as of September 30, 2010.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our
financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires us
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosures. We evaluate our
estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis, including research and
development and clinical trial accruals, and stock-based compensation estimates.
Our estimates are based on historical experience and various other assumptions
that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Our actual results
could differ from these estimates. We believe the following critical accounting
policies reflect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the
preparation of our financial statements and accompanying notes.
Research
and Development Expenses and Accruals
R&D
expenses consist primarily of salaries and related personnel costs, fees paid to
consultants and outside service providers for pre-clinical, clinical, and
manufacturing development, legal expenses resulting from intellectual property
prosecution, contractual review, and other expenses relating to the design,
development, testing, and enhancement of our product candidates. Except for
capitalized patent expenses, R&D costs are expensed as incurred. Amounts due
under such arrangements may be either fixed fee or fee for service, and may
include upfront payments, monthly payments, and payments upon the completion of
milestones or receipt of deliverables.
Our cost
accruals for clinical trials and other R&D activities are based on estimates
of the services received and efforts expended pursuant to contracts with
numerous clinical trial centers and CROs, clinical study sites, laboratories,
consultants, or other clinical trial vendors that perform the activities.
Related contracts vary significantly in length, and may be for a fixed amount, a
variable amount based on actual costs incurred, capped at a certain limit, or
for a combination of these elements. Activity levels are monitored through close
communication with the CRO’s and other clinical trial vendors, including
detailed invoice and task completion review, analysis of expenses against
budgeted amounts, analysis of work performed against approved contract budgets
and payment schedules, and recognition of any changes in scope of the services
to be performed. Certain CRO and significant clinical trial vendors provide an
estimate of costs incurred but not invoiced at the end of each quarter for each
individual trial. The estimates are reviewed and discussed with the CRO or
vendor as necessary, and are included in R&D expenses for the related
period. For clinical study sites, which are paid periodically on a per-subject
basis to the institutions performing the clinical study, we accrue an estimated
amount based on subject screening and enrollment in each quarter. All estimates
may differ significantly from the actual amount subsequently invoiced, which may
occur several months after the related services were performed.
In the
normal course of business we contract with third parties to perform various
R&D activities in the on-going development of our product candidates. The
financial terms of these agreements are subject to negotiation and vary from
contract to contract and may result in uneven payment flows. Payments under the
contracts depend on factors such as the achievement of certain events, the
successful enrollment of patients, and the completion of portions of the
clinical trial or similar conditions. The objective of our accrual policy is to
match the recording of expenses in our financial statements to the actual
services received and efforts expended. As such, expense accruals related to
clinical trials and other R&D activities are recognized based on our
estimate of the degree of completion of the event or events specified in the
specific contract.
No
adjustments for material changes in estimates have been recognized in any period
presented.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Our
results include non-cash compensation expense as a result of the issuance of
stock, stock options and warrants. We have issued stock options to employees,
directors, consultants and Scientific Advisory Board members under our Amended
and Restated 2005 Stock Option Plan.
We
expense the fair value of stock-based compensation over the vesting period. When
more precise pricing data is unavailable, we determine the fair value of stock
options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. This valuation model
requires us to make assumptions and judgments about the variables used in the
calculation. These variables and assumptions include the weighted-average period
of time that the options granted are expected to be outstanding, the volatility
of our common stock, the risk-free interest rate and the estimated rate of
forfeitures of unvested stock options.
Stock
options or other equity instruments to non-employees (including consultants and
all members of the Company’s Scientific Advisory Board) issued as consideration
for goods or services received by the Company are accounted for based on the
fair value of the equity instruments issued (unless the fair value of the
consideration received can be more reliably measured). The fair value of stock
options is determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and is
periodically remeasured as the underlying options vest. The fair value of any
options issued to non-employees is recorded as expense over the applicable
service periods.
The terms
and vesting schedules for share-based awards vary by type of grant and the
employment status of the grantee. Generally, the awards vest based upon
time-based or performance-based conditions. Performance-based conditions
generally include the attainment of goals related to our financial and
development performance. Stock-based compensation expense is included in the
respective categories of expense in the Statements of Operations. We expect to
record additional non-cash compensation expense in the future, which may be
significant.
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Our
exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our
cash and cash equivalents. The goal of our investment policy is to place our
investments with highly rated credit issuers and limit the amount of credit
exposure to any one issuer. We seek to improve the safety and likelihood of
preservation of our invested funds by limiting default risk and market risk. Our
policy is to mitigate default risk by investing in high credit quality
securities and currently do not hedge interest rate exposure. Due to our policy
to only make investments with short-term maturities, we do not believe that an
increase in market rates would have any material negative impact on the value of
our investment portfolio.
As of
September 30, 2010, our portfolio consisted primarily of bank savings accounts
and a certificate of deposit associated with our lease obligation, and we did
not have any investments with significant exposure to the subprime mortgage
market issues. Based on our investment portfolio and interest rates at September
30, 2010, we believe that a decrease in interest rates would not have a
significant impact on the fair value of our cash and cash equivalents of
approximately $4.4 million.
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures.
|
We
maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified
in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such
information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow
for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating
the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls
and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only
reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management
is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of
possible controls and procedures.
As
required by Commission Rule 13a-15(b), we carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September
30, 2010. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
There has
been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART
II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings.
|
The
Company is not a party to any material pending legal proceedings.
An
investment in our securities is speculative in nature, involves a high degree of
risk, and should not be made by an investor who cannot bear the economic risk of
its investment for an indefinite period of time and who cannot afford the loss
of its entire investment. You should carefully consider the
information described in the following risk factor, together with the other
information appearing elsewhere in this report, before making an investment
decision regarding our common stock. You should also consider the risk factors
set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009
(“2009 Annual Report”) under the caption “Item 1A. Risk Factors.” If
any of the risks described below or in our 2009 Annual Report actually occur,
our business, financial condition, results of operation and future growth
prospects would likely be materially and adversely affected. In these
circumstances, the market price of our common stock could decline, and you may
lose all or a part of your investment in our common stock. Moreover, the
risks described below and in our 2009 Annual Report are not the only ones that
we face. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently deem
immaterial may also affect our business, operating results, prospects or
financial condition.
We
have received notice from the Nasdaq Stock Market that we are not in compliance
with one of its continued listing requirements, which may result in the
delisting of our common stock from the Nasdaq Capital Market
Our
common stock is currently listed for trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market, and
the continued listing of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market is
subject to our compliance with a number of listing standards. On June 1, 2010,
we received notice from Nasdaq informing us that that we were not in compliance
with Nasdaq Marketplace Rule 5550(a)(2), which requires that our common stock
maintain a minimum closing bid price of $1.00. In accordance with Nasdaq rules,
we have been afforded a period of 180 days, or until November 29, 2010, in
which to regain compliance with the minimum closing bid price requirement. In
order to regain compliance, our common stock will need to have a minimum closing
bid price of $1.00 for at least 10 trading days. At all times since June 2010,
however, our common stock has continued to trade at less than $1.00 and it is
likely that our common stock will remain below $1.00 through the end of the
grace period expiring on November 29, 2010.
If we do
not regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement by November 29,
2010, we expect to receive a notice from Nasdaq indicating that our common stock
is subject to delisting. We will have the right to appeal that determination to
a Nasdaq Listings Qualifications Panel pursuant to applicable Nasdaq rules. If
we decide to appeal, our common stock may continue to be listed on the Nasdaq
Capital Market until the panel would render a decision. However, there can be no
assurance that any such appeal would be successful or that we will be able to
avoid delisting of our common stock from the Nasdaq Capital Market.
If our
common stock is delisted from the Nasdaq Capital Market, trading in our common
stock would likely be conducted on the OTC Bulletin Board, a regulated quotation
service. If trading of our common stock is conducted on the OTC Bulletin Board,
the liquidity of our common stock may be reduced, not only in terms of the
number of shares that can be bought and sold at a given price, but also through
delays in the timing of transactions and reduction in security analysts’ and the
media’s coverage of us. This may result in lower prices for our common stock
than might otherwise be obtained and could also result in a larger spread
between the bid and asked prices for our common stock.
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Securities and Use of
Proceeds.
|
Not
applicable.
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities.
|
Not
applicable.
Item
4.
|
[Removed
and Reserved.]
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information.
|
None.
Exhibit
No.
|
|
Exhibit
Description |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Letter
Agreement between Nile Therapeutics, Inc. and Richard Brewer, dated July
15, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 27, 2010).
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Severance
Benefits Agreement between Nile Therapeutics, Inc. and Daron Evans, dated
July 24, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 27,
2010).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Summary
terms of compensation plan for directors of Nile Therapeutics, Inc., as
amended July 26, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 27,
2010).
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Amendment
No. 1 to Services Agreement between Nile Therapeutics, Inc. and Two River
Consulting, LLC, dated August 12, 2010 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August
16, 2010).
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(e)/15d-15(e) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(e)/15d-15(e) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
|
NILE
THERAPEUTICS, INC.
|
|
|
|
Date: November
12, 2010
|
By:
|
/s/ Joshua
Kazam
|
|
|
Joshua
Kazam
|
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
|
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
Date: November
12, 2010
|
By:
|
/s/ Daron
Evans
|
|
|
Daron
Evans
|
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
|
(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT
INDEX
Exhibit No.
|
|
Exhibit
Description
|
31.1
|
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(e)/15d-15(e) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule
13a-15(e)/15d-15(e) as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|