MEI 07.30.2011 10Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
__________________________________
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
for the quarterly period ended July 30, 2011
or
o Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
__________________________________
Commission file number 0-2816
METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter.)
|
| | |
Delaware | | 36-2090085 |
(State or other jurisdiction of | | (I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) | | Identification No.) |
|
| | |
7401 West Wilson Avenue, Harwood Heights, Illinois | | 60706-4548 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) (708) 867-6777
None
(Former name, former address, former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or smaller reporting company. See definitions of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
| | |
Large accelerated filer o | | Accelerated filer x |
| | |
Non-accelerated filer o | | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
At August 30, 2011, registrant had 37,020,890 shares of common stock outstanding.
METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC.
FORM 10-Q
July 30, 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1 - Financial Statements
METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | As of | | As of |
| | July 30, 2011 | | April 30, 2011 |
| | (Unaudited) | | |
ASSETS | | |
| | |
|
CURRENT ASSETS | | |
| | |
|
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 84,426 |
| | $ | 57,445 |
|
Accounts receivable, net | | 83,996 |
| | 88,036 |
|
Inventories: | | | | |
|
Finished products | | 7,703 |
| | 6,271 |
|
Work in process | | 12,436 |
| | 10,981 |
|
Materials | | 20,263 |
| | 21,305 |
|
| | 40,402 |
| | 38,557 |
|
Deferred income taxes | | 3,735 |
| | 3,778 |
|
Prepaid and refundable income taxes | | 829 |
| | 851 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | | 9,280 |
| | 7,294 |
|
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS | | 222,668 |
| | 195,961 |
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT | | 298,359 |
| | 298,254 |
|
Less allowances for depreciation | | 236,471 |
| | 236,743 |
|
| | 61,888 |
| | 61,511 |
|
GOODWILL | | 16,422 |
| | 16,422 |
|
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net | | 17,961 |
| | 18,423 |
|
PRE-PRODUCTION COSTS | | 14,923 |
| | 14,645 |
|
OTHER ASSETS | | 27,345 |
| | 27,782 |
|
| | 76,651 |
| | 77,272 |
|
TOTAL ASSETS | | $ | 361,207 |
| | $ | 334,744 |
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | | |
| | |
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES | | |
| | |
|
Accounts payable | | $ | 37,772 |
| | $ | 37,152 |
|
Other current liabilities | | 27,024 |
| | 25,703 |
|
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES | | 64,796 |
| | 62,855 |
|
LONG-TERM DEBT | | 27,000 |
| | — |
|
OTHER LIABILITIES | | 5,279 |
| | 8,138 |
|
DEFERRED COMPENSATION | | 4,773 |
| | 2,607 |
|
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | |
| | |
|
Common stock, $0.50 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 38,363,078 and 38,312,243 shares issued as of July 30, 2011 and April 30, 2011, respectively | | 19,182 |
| | 19,156 |
|
Additional paid-in capital | | 74,002 |
| | 72,113 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income | | 21,195 |
| | 23,152 |
|
Treasury stock, 1,342,188 shares as of July 30, 2011 and April 30, 2011 | | (11,377 | ) | | (11,377 | ) |
Retained earnings | | 154,894 |
| | 155,989 |
|
TOTAL METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | 257,896 |
| | 259,033 |
|
Noncontrolling interest | | 1,463 |
| | 2,111 |
|
TOTAL EQUITY | | 259,359 |
| | 261,144 |
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | | $ | 361,207 |
| | $ | 334,744 |
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended |
| | July 30, 2011 | | July 31, 2010 |
| | |
| | |
|
Net sales | | $ | 110,804 |
| | $ | 98,973 |
|
| | | | |
Cost of products sold | | 90,824 |
| | 79,529 |
|
| | | | |
Gross Margins | | 19,980 |
| | 19,444 |
|
| | | | |
Selling and administrative expenses | | 18,562 |
| | 15,595 |
|
| | | | |
Income from operations | | 1,418 |
| | 3,849 |
|
| | | | |
Interest expense, net | | 4 |
| | 26 |
|
Other income, net | | (43 | ) | | (849 | ) |
| | | | |
Income before income taxes | | 1,457 |
| | 4,672 |
|
| | | | |
Income tax expense | | 22 |
| | 642 |
|
| | | | |
Net income | | 1,435 |
| | 4,030 |
|
| | | | |
Less: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest | | (59 | ) | | (35 | ) |
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC. | | $ | 1,494 |
| | 4,065 |
|
| | | | |
Amounts per common share attributable to Methode Electronics, Inc.: | | |
| | |
|
Basic | | $ | 0.04 |
| | $ | 0.11 |
|
Diluted | | $ | 0.04 |
| | $ | 0.11 |
|
Cash dividends: | | |
| | |
|
Common stock | | $ | 0.07 |
| | $ | 0.07 |
|
Weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding: | | |
| | |
|
Basic | | 37,277,306 |
| | 37,045,771 |
|
Diluted | | 37,518,183 |
| | 37,289,671 |
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended |
| | July 30, 2011 | | July 31, 2010 |
OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | |
| | |
|
Net income | | $ | 1,435 |
| | $ | 4,030 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities: | | |
| | |
|
Provision for depreciation | | 3,439 |
| | 3,356 |
|
Amortization of intangibles | | 462 |
| | 556 |
|
Amortization of stock awards and stock options | | 1,110 |
| | 342 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities | | (231 | ) | | (10,518 | ) |
Other | | 286 |
| | 22 |
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY/(USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | 6,501 |
| | (2,212 | ) |
| | | | |
INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | |
| | |
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment | | (4,553 | ) | | (1,956 | ) |
Purchase of investment | | — |
| | (750 | ) |
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | (4,553 | ) | | (2,706 | ) |
| | | | |
FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | |
| | |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | | 198 |
| | 13 |
|
Cash dividends | | (2,589 | ) | | (2,576 | ) |
Net borrowings | | 27,000 |
| | — |
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY/(USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | 24,609 |
| | (2,563 | ) |
| | | | |
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash | | 424 |
| | 109 |
|
| | | | |
INCREASE/(DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | 26,981 |
| | (7,372 | ) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | | 57,445 |
| | 63,821 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD | | $ | 84,426 |
| | $ | 56,449 |
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
July 30, 2011
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Methode Electronics, Inc. was incorporated in 1946 as an Illinois corporation and reincorporated in Delaware in 1966. As used herein, “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company” or “Methode” means Methode Electronics, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Our business is managed and our financial results are reported on a segment basis, with those segments being Automotive, Interconnect, Power Products and Other. The condensed consolidated financial statements and related disclosures as of July 30, 2011 and results of operations for the three months ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010 are unaudited, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The April 30, 2011 condensed consolidated balance sheet was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In our opinion, these financial statements include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for the fair statement of the results for the interim periods. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included in our Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2011 filed with the SEC on June 30, 2011. Results may vary from quarter to quarter for reasons other than seasonality.
2. RECENTLY ADOPTED AND ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, ("FASB"), issued Accounting Standards Update, ("ASU"), 2009-13, "Revenue Recognition - Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements - a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force," which amends FASB ASC 605, Revenue Recognition, by modifying the criteria used to separate elements in a multiple-element arrangement, introducing the concept of "best estimate of selling price" for determining the selling price of a deliverable, requiring use of the relative selling price method and prohibiting use of the residual method to allocate arrangement consideration among units of accounting, and expanding the disclosure requirements for all multiple-element arrangements within the scope of FASB ASC 605-25. The amended guidance is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, which is our current fiscal year that began May 1, 2011. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on our financial statements.
In December 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance regarding ASC No. 805, "Business Combinations," on the
disclosure of supplementary pro forma information for business combinations. ASC No. 805 requires a public entity to disclose pro forma information for business combinations that occurred in the current reporting period. The disclosures include pro forma revenue and earnings of the combined entity for the current reporting period as though the acquisition date for all business combinations that occurred during the year had been of the beginning of the annual reporting period.
If comparable financial statements are presented, the pro forma revenue and earnings of the combined entity for the comparable prior reporting period should be reported as though the acquisition date for all business combinations that occurred
during the current year had been as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period. This guidance specifies that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combinations that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. This guidance is effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after May 1, 2011, the beginning of our 2012 fiscal year. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, "Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS," which results in common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS. Consequently, the amendments change the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. ASU 2011-04 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011, which will be our fiscal 2012 third quarter beginning January 29, 2012. The adoption of this update is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.
METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, "Comprehensive Income" which requires companies to present the components of net income and other comprehensive income either as one continuous statement or as two consecutive statements. It eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. We will adopt this pronouncement for our fiscal year beginning April 29, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 is not expected to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
3. RESTRUCTURINGS
March 2009 Restructuring
In March 2009, we announced restructuring initiatives to consolidate our manufacturing facilities to reduce costs. All of the March 2009 restructuring initiatives were complete as of the end of fiscal 2010. At the end of fiscal 2011, we had an accrued restructuring liability of $280 reflected in the current liabilities section of our condensed consolidated balance sheet. We expect this liability to be paid out by the end of fiscal 2012.
The table below reflects the activity related to the March 2009 restructuring for the three months ended July 30, 2011:
|
| | | |
| Other Costs |
Accrued balance at April 30, 2011 | $ | 280 |
|
| |
|
Payments during the first quarter of fiscal 2012 | — |
|
Accrued balance at July 30, 2011 | $ | 280 |
|
4. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS)
The components of our comprehensive income/(loss) for the three months ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010 include net income/(loss) and adjustments to stockholders’ equity for foreign currency translations. The foreign currency translation adjustment was due to exchange rate fluctuations in our foreign affiliates’ local currency versus the U.S. dollar.
The following table presents details of our comprehensive income/(loss):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended July 30, 2011 |
| | | | Methode | | Noncontrolling |
| | Total | | Shareholders | | Interest |
Net income/(loss) | | $ | 1,435 |
| | $ | 1,494 |
| | $ | (59 | ) |
Translation adjustment | | (1,941 | ) | | (1,957 | ) | | 16 |
|
Total comprehensive loss | | $ | (506 | ) | | $ | (463 | ) | | $ | (43 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended July 31, 2010 |
| | | | Methode | | Noncontrolling |
| | Total | | Shareholders | | Interest |
Net income/(loss) | | $ | 4,030 |
| | 4,065 |
| | $ | (35 | ) |
Translation adjustment | | (775 | ) | | (808 | ) | | 33 |
|
Total comprehensive income/(loss) | | $ | 3,255 |
| | $ | 3,257 |
| | $ | (2 | ) |
METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
5. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
We review our goodwill and other intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable, and we also review our goodwill and indefinite-lived assets annually in accordance with ASC No. 350, “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other”. The values assigned to goodwill and intangible assets are normally based on estimates and judgments regarding expectations for the success and life cycle of products and technologies acquired. A severe decline in expectations could result in significant impairment charges, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
The following tables show the roll-forward of goodwill in the financial statements for the three months ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010. There was no activity for either period presented.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended July 30, 2011 |
| | | | Power | | |
| | Interconnect | | Products | | Total |
Balance as of April 30, 2011 | | $ | 11,146 |
| | $ | 5,276 |
| | $ | 16,422 |
|
Attributable to acquisitions | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Adjustments due to earn-out | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Adjustments due to finalization of purchase price allocation | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Balance as of July 30, 2011 | | $ | 11,146 |
| | $ | 5,276 |
| | $ | 16,422 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended July 31, 2010 |
| | | | Power | | |
| | Interconnect | | Products | | Total |
Balance as of May 1, 2010 | | $ | 11,146 |
| | $ | 950 |
| | $ | 12,096 |
|
Attributable to acquisitions | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Adjustments due to earn-out | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Adjustments due to finalization of purchase price allocation | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Balance as of July 31, 2010 | | $ | 11,146 |
| | $ | 950 |
| | $ | 12,096 |
|
The following tables present details of the Company’s intangible assets:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of July 30, 2011 |
| | | | | | | | Wtd. Avg. |
| | | | | | | | Remaining |
| | | | Accumulated | | | | Amortization |
| | Gross | | Amortization | | Net | | Periods (Years) |
Customer relationships and agreements | | $ | 14,995 |
| | $ | 13,504 |
| | $ | 1,491 |
| | 12.4 |
|
Trade names, patents and technology licenses | | 25,774 |
| | 9,340 |
| | 16,434 |
| | 12.3 |
|
Covenants not to compete | | 480 |
| | 444 |
| | 36 |
| | 0.6 |
|
Total | | $ | 41,249 |
| | $ | 23,288 |
| | $ | 17,961 |
| | |
METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | As of April 30, 2011 |
| | | | | | | | Wtd. Avg. |
| | | | | | | | Remaining |
| | | | Accumulated | | | | Amortization |
| | Gross | | Amortization | | Net | | Periods (Years) |
Customer relationships and agreements | | $ | 14,995 |
| | $ | 13,417 |
| | $ | 1,578 |
| | 12.7 |
|
Trade names, patents and technology licenses | | 25,774 |
| | 8,978 |
| | 16,796 |
| | 12.4 |
|
Covenants not to compete | | 480 |
| | 431 |
| | 49 |
| | 0.8 |
|
Total | | $ | 41,249 |
| | $ | 22,826 |
| | $ | 18,423 |
| | |
The estimated aggregate amortization expense for the current fiscal year and each of the four succeeding fiscal years is as follows:
|
| | | |
2012 | $ | 1,804 |
|
2013 | 1,525 |
|
2014 | 1,481 |
|
2015 | 1,469 |
|
2016 | 1,317 |
|
As of July 30, 2011 and April 30, 2011, the trade names, patents and technology licenses include $1,800 of trade names that are not subject to amortization.
6. INCOME TAXES
At July 30, 2011 and April 30, 2011, we had valuation allowances against our deferred tax assets of $56,118 and $54,015, respectively. In accordance with ASC No. 740, “Income Taxes,” a valuation allowance is required to be recorded when it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets will not be realized. Future realization depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income within the carry-forward period available under the tax laws. Sources of future taxable income include future reversals of taxable temporary differences, future taxable income exclusive of reversing taxable differences, taxable income in carry-back years and tax planning strategies. These sources of positive evidence of realizability must be weighed against negative evidence, such as cumulative losses in recent years.
In forming a judgment about the future realization of our deferred tax assets, we considered both the positive and negative evidence of realizability and gave significant weight to the negative evidence from our recent cumulative loss in the U.S. We will continue to assess this situation and make appropriate adjustments to the valuation allowance based on our evaluation of the positive and negative evidence existing at the time. We are currently unable to forecast when there will be sufficient positive evidence for us to reverse the valuation allowances that we have recorded.
The valuation allowance is associated with the deferred tax assets for the differences between book and tax that result from net operating losses (NOLs), foreign investment tax credits with unlimited carryovers generated in the current and prior years and temporary differences which become deductible when the related asset is recovered or related liability is settled.
A reconciliation of the consolidated provisions for income taxes to amounts determined by applying the prevailing statutory federal income tax rate to pre-tax earnings is as follows:
METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended |
| | July 30, 2011 | | July 31, 2010 |
Income tax provision at statutory rate | | $ | 531 |
| | $ | 1,648 |
|
Effect of: | | |
| | |
|
State income taxes, net of federal benefit | | 23 |
| | 26 |
|
Foreign operations with lower statutory rates | | (2,507 | ) | | (2,657 | ) |
Valuation allowance | | 1,933 |
| | 2,053 |
|
Uncertain tax positions | | (23 | ) | | — |
|
Other, net | | 65 |
| | (428 | ) |
Income tax provision | | $ | 22 |
| | $ | 642 |
|
We recognize interest and penalties accrued related to the unrecognized tax benefits in the provision for income taxes. During the three months ended July 30, 2011, we recognized an expense of $1 in interest and zero in penalties. We had approximately $325 accrued at July 30, 2011 for the payment of interest and penalties. The total unrecognized tax benefit as of July 30, 2011 was $338.
METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollar amounts in thousands, except share data)
The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits:
|
| | | |
Balance at April 30, 2011 | $ | 375 |
|
Increases for positions related to the current year | — |
|
Decreases for positions related to the prior years | — |
|
Settlements | (37 | ) |
Lapsing of statutes of limitations | — |
|
Balance at July 30, 2011 | $ | 338 |
|
We believe that it is reasonably possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits will change within the next twelve months. We have certain tax return years subject to statutes of limitation, which will close within twelve months of the end of the quarter. Unless challenged by tax authorities, the closure of those statutes of limitation is expected to result in the recognition of uncertain tax positions of approximately $37.
The Company and all of its domestic subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various states. Our foreign subsidiaries file income tax returns in certain foreign jurisdictions since they have operations outside the U.S. The Company and its subsidiaries are generally no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local examinations by tax authorities for all years except fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009.
7. COMMON STOCK AND STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth the changes in the number of issued shares of common stock during the three-month periods presented:
|
| | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended |
| | July 30, 2011 | | July 31, 2010 |
Balance at the beginning of the period | | 38,312,243 |
| | 38,149,946 |
|
Options exercised | | 21,975 |
| | 1,350 |
|
Restricted stock awards vested | | 28,860 |
| | 24,000 |
|
Balance at the end of the period | | 38,363,078 |
| | 38,175,296 |
|
On July 29, 2011, we paid a quarterly dividend of $2,589.
Stock Options Granted Under the 2010 Stock Plan
In July 2011, the Compensation Committee approved the grant of options to purchase 128,000 shares of our common stock to our executive officers. The stock options have a ten-year term and will vest 33.3% each year over a three-year period. The exercise price is the closing price on the date granted.
The following tables summarize the stock option activity and related information for the stock options granted under the 2010 stock plan for the three months ended July 30, 2011:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Summary of Option Activity |
| | Shares | | Wtd. Avg. Exercise Price |
Outstanding at April 30, 2011 | | 128,000 |
| | $ | 9.24 |
|
Granted | | 128,000 |
| | 10.70 |
|
Exercised | | — |
| | — |
|
Cancelled | | — |
| | — |
|
Outstanding at July 30, 2011 | | 256,000 |
| | $ | 9.97 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
Options Outstanding at July 30, 2011 |
Exercise Price | | Shares | | Avg. Remaining Life (Years) |
$ | 9.24 |
| | 128,000 |
| | 9.2 |
|
$ | 10.70 |
| | 128,000 |
| | 10.0 |
|
The options outstanding had an intrinsic value of $172 at July 30, 2011. The intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the first quarter of fiscal 2012 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on July 30, 2011.
We estimated the fair value of our employee stock options on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
|
| | | | | | |
| Fiscal 2011 | Fiscal 2012 |
| Awards | Awards |
Average expected volatility | 85.83 | % | 52.76 | % |
Average risk-free interest rate | 0.60 | % | 0.63 | % |
Dividend yield | 3.49 | % | 2.66 | % |
Expected life of options | 7.03 years | 7.03 years |
Weighted-average grant-date fair value | $ | 5.19 |
| $ | 4.27 |
|
We recognized pre-tax compensation expense for stock options granted under the 2010 stock plan of $109 for the three months ended July 30, 2011 and zero for the three months ended July 31, 2010. We record the compensation expense related to the stock options in the selling and administrative section of our condensed consolidated statement of operations.
Restricted Stock Awards and Restricted Stock Units Granted Under the 2010 Stock Plan
Our Compensation Committee awarded 640,000 shares of common stock subject to performance-based restricted stock awards to certain members of management during the third quarter of fiscal 2011. The performance measure will be the Company's internal enterprise value at the end of fiscal 2015. The internal enterprise value shall equal the product of (i) fiscal 2015 EBITDA and (ii) 7.5 (the historic multiple of EBITDA), subject to an adjustment for cash, short-term investments, debt, preferred stock, certain equity issuances, certain acquisitions and the changes in the dividend rate. The restricted stock awards will vest, i.e., the restrictions will lapse, at the end of the five-year performance period to the extent the performance goals have been achieved. The remaining shares will be forfeited.
Our Compensation Committee awarded 320,000 shares of common stock subject to time-based restricted stock units to certain members of management during the third quarter of fiscal 2011. The restricted stock units will vest 20% each year on the last day of our fiscal year and be 100% vested on the last day of fiscal 2015 provided the executive remains employed.
The following table summarizes the RSA and RSU activity for the three months ended July 30, 2011 for the RSA's and RSU's granted under the 2010 stock plan:
|
| | | | |
| RSA | RSU |
| Shares | Shares |
Unvested and unissued at April 30, 2011 | 640,000 |
| 320,000 |
|
Awarded | — |
| — |
|
Vested | — |
| — |
|
Forfeited and Cancelled | — |
| — |
|
Unvested and unissued at July 30, 2011 | 640,000 |
| 320,000 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Weighted Average Value | | Probable Unearned Compensation Expense at | | Target Unearned Compensation Expense at |
Grant Fiscal Year | | Number of Shares | | Vesting Period | | | July 30, 2011 | | July 30, 2011 |
2011 | | 640,000 |
| | 5-year cliff, performance based | | $ | 9.70 |
| | $ | 4,817 |
| | $ | 4,817 |
|
2011 | | 320,000 |
| | 5-year, equal annual installments | | 9.70 |
| | 1,629 |
| | N/A |
We recognized pre-tax compensation expense for RSAs issued under the 2010 stock plan of $548 and zero for the three months ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010, respectively. We record the expense in the selling and administrative section of our condensed consolidated statement of operations.
Stock Options Granted Under the 2007 Stock Plan
The following tables summarize the stock option activity and related information for the stock options granted under the 2007 stock plan for the three months ended July 30, 2011:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Summary of Option Activity |
| | | | Wtd. Avg. |
| | Shares | | Exercise Price |
Outstanding at April 30, 2011 | | 720,500 |
| | $ | 5.77 |
|
Granted | | — |
| | — |
|
Exercised | | — |
| | — |
|
Cancelled | | — |
| | — |
|
Outstanding at July 30, 2011 | | 720,500 |
| | $ | 5.77 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
Options Outstanding at July 30, 2011 |
| | | | Avg. |
| | | | Remaining |
Exercise Price | | Shares | | Life (Years) |
$ | 2.72 |
| | 285,000 |
| | 7.6 |
|
$ | 6.46 |
| | 275,000 |
| | 7.9 |
|
$ | 8.13 |
| | 35,500 |
| | 8.4 |
|
$ | 10.55 |
| | 125,000 |
| | 9.0 |
|
$ | 5.77 |
| | 720,500 |
| | |
The options outstanding had an intrinsic value of $3,464 at July 30, 2011.
We estimated the fair value of our employee stock options on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fiscal 2009 | | Fiscal 2010 | | Fiscal 2011 |
| | Awards | | Awards | | Awards |
Average expected volatility | | 69.58 | % | | 86.88 | % | | 85.59 | % |
Average risk-free interest rate | | 1.39 | % | | 1.43 | % | | 1.09 | % |
Dividend yield | | 2.26 | % | | 2.77 | % | | 3.63 | % |
Expected life of options | | 6.87 years |
| | 6.87 years |
| | 7.03 years |
|
Weighted-average grant-date fair value | | $ | 1.46 |
| | $ | 4.02 |
| | $ | 5.88 |
|
We recognized pre-tax compensation expense for stock options granted under the 2007 stock plan of $144 and $66 for the three months ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010, respectively. We record the compensation expense related to the stock options in the selling and administrative section of our condensed consolidated statement of operations.
Restricted Stock Awards Granted Under the 2007 Stock Plan
In April 2007, 225,000 shares of common stock subject to performance-based Restricted Stock Awards (RSAs) granted to our CEO in fiscal 2006 and 2007 were converted to Restricted Stock Units (RSUs). The RSUs were subject to the same vesting schedule and other major provisions of the RSAs they replaced, except the shares for stock underlying the RSUs will not be issued and delivered until the earlier of: (1) thirty days after the CEO’s date of termination of employment with the Company and all of its subsidiaries and affiliates; or (2) the last day of our fiscal year in which the payment of common stock in satisfaction of the RSUs becomes deductible to the Company under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The RSUs are not entitled to voting rights or the payment of dividends. The RSU’s are fully vested as of July 30, 2011. As of July 30, 2011, no shares have been delivered pursuant to the RSUs.
At the beginning of fiscal 2012, there were no RSAs outstanding related to the 2007 stock plan. During the three months ended July 30, 2011, we awarded 28,860 restricted shares to our independent directors, all of which vested immediately upon grant.
We recognized pre-tax compensation expense for RSAs issued under the 2007 stock plan of $309 and $276 for the three months ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010, respectively. We record the expense in the selling and administrative section of our condensed consolidated statement of operations.
Stock Options Granted Under the 2000 and 2004 Stock Plans
Options to purchase 259,537 shares of our common stock were granted in previous years under the 2000 and 2004 stock plans and are outstanding and exercisable as of July 30, 2011. There was no remaining compensation expense related to these options in the first quarter of fiscal 2012.
The following tables summarize the stock option activity and related information for the stock options granted under the 2000 and 2004 stock plans for the three months ended July 30, 2011:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Summary of Option Activity |
| | | | Wtd. Avg. |
| | Shares | | Exercise Price |
Outstanding at April 30, 2011 | | 282,767 |
| | $ | 10.82 |
|
Exercised | | (21,975 | ) | | 9.02 |
|
Forfeited and Expired | | (1,255 | ) | | 11.44 |
|
Outstanding at July 30, 2011 | | 259,537 |
| | $ | 10.97 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
Options Outstanding and Exercisable at July 30, 2011 |
| | | | Wtd. Avg. | | Avg. |
Range of | | | | Exercise | | Remaining |
Exercise Prices | | Shares | | Price | | Life (Years) |
$9.03 - $11.44 | | 259,537 |
| | $ | 10.97 |
| | 1.4 |
|
The options outstanding had an intrinsic value of $10 at July 30, 2011.
8. NET INCOME PER SHARE
Basic net income per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the applicable period. Diluted income per share is calculated after adjusting the denominator of the basic income per share calculation for the effect of all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended |
| | July 30, 2011 | | July 31, 2010 |
Numerator - net income attributable to Methode Electronics, Inc. | | $ | 1,494 |
| | 4,065 |
|
Denominator: | | — |
| | — |
|
Denominator for basic income per share-weighted average shares | | 37,277,306 |
| | 37,045,771 |
|
Dilutive potential common shares-employee stock options | | 240,877 |
| | 243,900 |
|
Denominator for diluted loss per share adjusted weighted average shares and assumed conversions | | 37,518,183 |
| | 37,289,671 |
|
Net income per share: | | |
| | |
|
Basic and diluted | | $ | 0.04 |
| | $ | 0.11 |
|
For the three months ended July 30, 2011, options to purchase 129,935 shares of common stock at a weighted-average exercise price of $11.44 per share were outstanding, but were not included in the computation of net income per share because the exercise prices were greater than the average market price of $11.01 for our common stock for the first three months of fiscal 2012, and, therefore, the effect would have been anti-dilutive. For the three months ended July 31, 2010, options to purchase 395,867 shares of common stock at a weighted-average exercise price of $10.84 per share were outstanding, but were not included in the computation of net income per share because the exercise prices were greater than the average market price of $10.37 for our common stock for the first three months of fiscal 2011, and, therefore, the effect would have been anti-dilutive.
9. SEGMENT INFORMATION
We are a global manufacturer of component and subsystem devices. We design, manufacture and market devices employing electrical, electronic, wireless, sensing and optical technologies. Our components are found in the primary end markets of the automotive, appliance, communications (including information processing and storage, networking equipment, wireless and terrestrial voice/data systems), aerospace, rail and other transportation industries; and the consumer and industrial equipment markets.
ASC No. 280, “Segment Reporting” (“ASC No. 280”), establishes annual and interim reporting standards for an enterprise’s operating segments and related disclosures about its products, services, geographic areas and major customers. An operating segment is defined as a component of an enterprise that engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses, and about which separate financial information is regularly evaluated by the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) in deciding how to allocate resources. The CODM, as defined by ASC No. 280, is the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer.
The Automotive segment supplies electronic and electromechanical devices and related products to automobile OEMs, either directly or through their tiered suppliers, including control switches for electrical power and signals, connectors for electrical devices, integrated control components, switches and sensors that monitor the operation or status of a component or system, and packaging of electrical components.
The Interconnect segment provides a variety of copper and fiber-optic interconnect and interface solutions for the appliance, computer, networking, telecommunications, storage, medical, military, aerospace, commercial and consumer markets. Solutions include solid-state field effect interface panels, PC and express card packaging, optical and copper transceivers, terminators, custom cable assemblies and conductive polymer and thick film inks. Services include the design
and installation of fiber optic and copper infrastructure systems, and the manufacture of active and passive optical components.
The Power Products segment manufactures current-carrying laminated bus devices, custom power-product assemblies, powder coated bus bars, braided flexible cables and high-current low voltage flexible power cabling systems that are used in various markets and applications, including telecommunications, computers, transportation, industrial and power conversion, insulated gate bipolar transistor solutions, aerospace and military.
The Other segment includes a designer and manufacturer of magnetic torque sensing products, and independent laboratories that provide services for qualification testing and certification, and analysis of electronic and optical components.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies in our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011. We allocate resources to segments based on operating income. Transfers between segments are recorded using internal transfer prices set by us. The following tables represent information regarding our segments:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended July 30, 2011 |
| | Automotive | | Interconnect | | Power Products | | Other | | Eliminations/Corporate | | Consolidated |
Net sales | | $ | 63,366 |
| | $ | 33,514 |
| | $ | 12,891 |
| | $ | 2,946 |
| | $ | (1,913 | ) | | $ | 110,804 |
|
Transfers between segments | | (689 | ) | | (1,126 | ) | | (45 | ) | | (16 | ) | | 1,876 |
| | — |
|
Net sales to unaffiliated customers | | $ | 62,677 |
| | $ | 32,388 |
| | $ | 12,846 |
| | $ | 2,930 |
| | $ | (37 | ) | | $ | 110,804 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income (loss) from operations | | $ | 2,246 |
| | $ | 4,297 |
| | $ | 222 |
| | $ | (999 | ) | | $ | (4,348 | ) | | $ | 1,418 |
|
Interest (income)/expense, net | | (70 | ) | | 21 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 53 |
| | 4 |
|
Other (income)/expense, net | | 36 |
| | 300 |
| | 96 |
| | 3 |
| | (478 | ) | | (43 | ) |
Income/(loss) before income taxes | | $ | 2,280 |
| | $ | 3,976 |
| | $ | 126 |
| | $ | (1,002 | ) | | $ | (3,923 | ) | | $ | 1,457 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended July 31, 2010 |
| | Automotive | | Interconnect | | Power Products | | Other | | Eliminations/Corporate | | Consolidated |
Net sales | | $ | 49,945 |
| | $ | 34,762 |
| | $ | 11,626 |
| | $ | 2,900 |
| | $ | (260 | ) | | $ | 98,973 |
|
Transfers between segments | | — |
| | (152 | ) | | (77 | ) | | (38 | ) | | 267 |
| | — |
|
Net sales to unaffiliated customers | | $ | 49,945 |
| | $ | 34,610 |
| | $ | 11,549 |
| | $ | 2,862 |
| | $ | 7 |
| | $ | 98,973 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Income/(loss) from operations | | $ | 2,889 |
| | $ | 3,783 |
| | $ | 554 |
| | $ | (572 | ) | | $ | (2,805 | ) | | $ | 3,849 |
|
Interest (income)/expense, net | | (65 | ) | | (68 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 159 |
| | 26 |
|
Other (income)/expense, net | | 132 |
| | 170 |
| | 48 |
| | 1 |
| | (1,200 | ) | | (849 | ) |
Income/(loss) before income taxes | | $ | 2,822 |
| | $ | 3,681 |
| | $ | 506 |
| | $ | (573 | ) | | $ | (1,764 | ) | | $ | 4,672 |
|
10. CONTINGENCIES
Certain litigation arising in the normal course of business is pending against us. We are from time to time subject to various legal actions and claims incidental to our business, including those arising out of alleged defects, breach of contracts, employment-related matters and environmental matters. We consider insurance coverage and third-party indemnification when determining required accruals for pending litigation and claims. Although the outcome of potential legal actions and claims cannot be determined, it is our opinion, based on the information available, that we have adequate reserves for these liabilities.
Delphi Related Litigation
On September 4, 2008, Methode and Delphi Automotive Systems LLC (“Delphi”) entered into a supply agreement pursuant to which Methode was to supply all of Delphi’s requirements for the seat bladders used in Delphi’s occupant restraint system from October 1, 2008 through September 30, 2011. On August 26, 2009, Delphi notified us that effective September 10, 2009, our supply arrangement was terminated. We are contesting Delphi’s right to terminate this long-term supply arrangement and the parties are engaged in litigation regarding this supply agreement and our related intellectual property.
In March 2010, DPH Holdings Corp., as successor to Delphi Corporation, served the Company with a complaint seeking to recover approximately $19,726 in alleged preference payments that Delphi made to the Company within the 90-day preference period preceding Delphi’s bankruptcy filing. The Company is seeking to dismiss the Delphi preference complaint based on violations of due process and the Company possesses several other substantive defenses.
11. PRE-PRODUCTION COSTS RELATED TO LONG-TERM SUPPLY ARRANGEMENTS
We incur pre-production tooling costs related to certain products produced for our customers under long-term supply agreements. We had $14,923 and $14,645 as of July 30, 2011 and April 30, 2011, respectively, of pre-production tooling costs related to customer-owned tools for which reimbursement is contractually guaranteed by the customer or for which the customer has provided a non-cancelable right to use the tooling. The unreimbursed costs incurred related to customer-owned tooling, for which we have the right to use, that are not subject to reimbursement are capitalized and depreciated over the expected life of the tooling or the life of the related vehicle program, whichever is shorter. Engineering, testing and other costs incurred in the design and development of production parts are expensed as incurred, unless the costs are reimbursable, as specified in a customer contract. These amounts are included in our other non-current assets section as they're stated on the face of the balance sheet under "pre-production costs". Net revenues and costs on projects are deferred and recognized over the life of the related long-term supply agreement on a gross basis in the consolidated statement of operations.
12. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
ASC No. 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants.
ASC No. 820 also specifies a fair value hierarchy based upon the observation of inputs in valuation techniques. Observable inputs (highest level) reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs (lowest level) reflect internally developed market assumptions. In accordance with ASC No. 820, fair value measurements are classified under the following hierarchy:
· Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
· Level 2 — Quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities, or other inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
· Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets and liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.
Assets and liabilities recorded at fair value are valued using quoted market prices or under a market approach using other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable instruments and included in a table below which summarizes the fair value of assets and liabilities as of July 30, 2011:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value Measurement Used |
| | Recorded Value | | Quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments | | Quoted prices in active markets for similar instruments | | Other unobservable inputs |
| | | (Level 1) | | (Level 2) | | (Level 3) |
Assets: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Cash and cash equivalents (1) | | $ | 84,426 |
| | $ | 84,426 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Assets related to deferred compensation plan | | 3,917 |
| | — |
| | 3,917 |
| | — |
|
Total assets at fair value | | $ | 88,343 |
| | $ | 84,426 |
| | $ | 3,917 |
| | $ | — |
|
Liabilities: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Liabilities related to deferred compensation plan | | $ | 3,001 |
| | $ | 3,001 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
Total liabilities at fair value | | $ | 3,001 |
| | $ | 3,001 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
(1)Includes cash, money-market investments and certificates of deposit.
Fair Value of Other Financial Instruments. The carrying values of our short-term financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and short-term debt approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.
13. DEBT AND CREDIT AGREEMENT
On February 25, 2011, we entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and certain other financial institutions, which amends and restates our previous credit facility and extends the maturity to February 25, 2016. The new credit facility is in the aggregate principal amount of $75,000, with an option to increase the principal amount by an additional $25,000 subject to customary conditions and approval of the lender(s) providing new commitment(s). The new credit facility provides for variable rates of interest based on the type of borrowing and the Company's debt to EBITDA financial ratio. The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement is guaranteed by certain of our U.S. subsidiaries. At July 30, 2011, we were in compliance with the covenants of the agreement. During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, we had borrowings of $27,000 and interest payments of $108. As of July 30, 2011, there were outstanding balances due against the credit facility of $27,000.
14. ACQUISITIONS
At the beginning of fiscal 2012, we had an investment in Eetrex of $2,720, for a 70% ownership in their stock. Eetrex is located in Boulder, Colorado and is a developer and manufacturer of chargers, inverters and battery systems for hybrid and plug-in hybrid electronic vehicles. In July 2011, we paid an additional $600 and acquired an additional 10% of their stock, for a total 80% ownership. We have an additional option to acquire an additional 10% of Eetrex between September 1, 2011 and October 31, 2011 for $480. In the event we exercise the option to purchase the additional 10%, each of the existing stockholders of Eetrex will have the right to exercise put options, requiring us to purchase their remaining shares after the end of fiscal 2014 or 2016, and we will have an option to purchase any remaining shares after the end of fiscal 2016. The purchase price will be based on a percentage of net sales recorded since March 2011 of between 2.0% and 3.5%.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Cautionary Statement
Certain statements in this report are forward-looking statements that are subject to certain risks and uncertainties. We undertake no duty to update any such forward-looking statements to conform to actual results or changes in our expectations. Our business is highly dependent upon two large automotive customers and specific makes and models of automobiles. Our results will be subject to many of the same risks that apply to the automotive, appliance, computer and telecommunications industries, such as general economic conditions, interest rates, consumer spending patterns and technological changes. Other factors, which may result in materially different results for future periods, include the following risk factors. These risk factors should be considered in connection with evaluating the forward-looking statements contained in this report because these factors could cause our actual results and condition to differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements in this report are subject to the safe harbor protection provided under the securities laws and are made as of the date of this report.
| |
• | We depend on a small number of large customers, specifically two large automotive customers. If we were to lose either of these customers or experienced a significant decline in the volume of products purchased by these customers, or if either of these customers declare bankruptcy, our future results could be adversely affected. |
| |
• | Because we derive a substantial portion of our revenues from customers in the automotive, appliance, computer and communications industries, we are susceptible to trends and factors affecting those industries. |
| |
• | Further downturns in the automotive industry or the bankruptcy of certain automotive customers could reduce the sales and profitability of our business. |
| |
• | Our technology-based business and the markets in which we operate are highly competitive. If we are unable to compete effectively, our sales will decline. |
| |
• | We face risks relating to our international operations, including political and economic instability, expropriation, or the imposition of government controls. |
| |
• | We are dependent on the availability and price of materials. |
| |
• | Disruption of our supply chain could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. |
| |
• | We may be unable to keep pace with rapid technological changes, which would adversely affect our business. |
| |
• | Products we manufacture may contain design or manufacturing defects that could result in reduced demand for our products or services and liability claims against us. |
| |
• | If we are unable to protect our intellectual property or we infringe, or are alleged to infringe, on another person’s intellectual property, our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected. |
| |
• | We are subject to continuing pressure to lower our prices. |
| |
• | We were awarded new North American automotive business in fiscal 2011 for programs that will not begin production until fiscal 2013. We anticipate that it will take a significant amount of our cash and resources to launch these programs. |
| |
• | We currently have a significant amount of our cash located outside the U.S. and we may suffer adverse tax consequences if we repatriate this cash. |
| |
• | A significant fluctuation between the U.S. dollar and other currencies could adversely impact our operating results. |
| |
• | We may acquire businesses or divest business operations. These transactions may pose significant risks and may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. |
| |
• | We could suffer significant business interruptions, which could adversely affect our sales and operating results. |
| |
• | Unfavorable tax law changes may adversely affect results. |
| |
• | We cannot ensure that the newly acquired Eetrex business will be successful or that we can implement and profit from any new applications of the acquired technology. |
•The future trading price of our common stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to a variety of factors.
Any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results, developments and business decisions may differ materially from those foreseen in such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of the report, press release, statement, document, webcast or oral discussion in which they are made. We do not intend to update any forward-looking statements, all of which are expressly qualified by the foregoing. See Part I — Item 1A, Risk Factors of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011, for a further discussion regarding some of the reasons that actual results may be materially different from those we anticipate.
Overview
We are a global manufacturer of component and subsystem devices with manufacturing, design and testing facilities in China, Germany, India, Lebanon, Malta, Mexico, the Philippines, Singapore, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States. We are a global designer and manufacturer of electronic and electro-mechanical devices. We design, manufacture and market devices employing electrical, radio remote control, electronic, wireless, sensing and optical technologies. Our business is managed on a segment basis, with those segments being Automotive, Interconnect, Power Products and Other. For more information regarding the business and products of these segments, see “Item 1. Business.” of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011.
Our components are found in the primary end markets of the aerospace, appliance, automotive, construction, consumer and industrial equipment markets, communications (including information processing and storage, networking equipment, wireless and terrestrial voice/data systems), rail and other transportation industries
Recent Transactions
In July 2011, we paid $0.6 million for an additional 10% investment, for a total 80% ownership, in Eetrex Incorporated to facilitate our expansion into the electric vehicle market. Eetrex is located in Boulder, Colorado and is a developer and manufacturer of chargers, inverters and battery systems for hybrid and plug-in hybrid electronic vehicles.
Business Outlook
Looking at the remainder of fiscal 2012, our European businesses may experience softness as slowing demand continues to roll through Europe because of the debt crisis affecting both internal and export demand. Because of these economic conditions, we intend to implement actions to reduce selling and administrative expenses in Europe. We expect our North American automotive customers’ production to soften as the economy continues to struggle. Recent events in the Middle East have resulted in significantly higher oil prices, which are expected to continue to result in higher prices for oil-based commodities, such as resins. We anticipate sales of Power Products to improve modestly as we expand with new customers and markets. While Interconnect sales to our industrial customers should modestly increase, sales to our customers in the appliance industry will continue to be soft until unemployment and home sales improve. We expect to continue to experience vendor supply issues for new automotive products that began production in the second quarter of fiscal 2011 until our in-house capabilities are brought on-line in late fiscal 2012. We anticipate carrying higher design, development and engineering costs through fiscal 2012 to support the multiple product launches and new product development in fiscal 2013. Additionally, sales of product using our torque sensing technology have been slower to materialize that expected. The Company maintains a positive long-term outlook for its global business and is committed to developing new product solutions for our customers and to making strategic capital investments as it pursues its growth strategy.
Results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted. See “Item 1A Risk Factors” of our Form 10-K, for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2011.
Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended July 30, 2011 as Compared to the Three Months Ended July 31, 2010
Consolidated Results
Below is a table summarizing results for the three months ended:
(in millions)
(“N/M” equals not meaningful)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | July 30, 2011 | | July 31, 2010 | | Net Change | | Net Change |
Net sales | | $ | 110.8 |
| | $ | 99.0 |
| | $ | 11.8 |
| | 11.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Cost of products sold | | 90.8 |
| | 79.5 |
| | 11.3 |
| | 14.2 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Gross margins | | 20.0 |
| | 19.5 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 2.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Selling and administrative expenses | | 18.6 |
| | 15.6 |
| | 3.0 |
| | 19.2 | % |
Other income, net | | — |
| | (0.8 | ) | | 0.8 |
| | N/M |
Income tax expense | | — |
| | 0.6 |
| | (0.6 | ) | | N/M |
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest | | (0.1 | ) | | — |
| | (0.1 | ) | | N/M |
Net income attributable to Methode Electronics, Inc. | | $ | 1.5 |
| | $ | 4.1 |
| | $ | (2.6 | ) | | (63.4 | )% |
| | | | | | | | |
Percent of sales: | | July 30, 2011 | | July 31, 2010 | | | | |
Net sales | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | | | | |
Cost of products sold | | 81.9 | % | | 80.3 | % | | | | |
Gross margins | | 18.1 | % | | 19.7 | % | | | | |
Selling and administrative expenses | | 16.8 | % | | 15.8 | % | | | | |
Other income, net | | — | % | | (0.8 | )% | | | | |
Income tax expense | | — | % | | 0.6 | % | | | | |
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest | | (0.1 | )% | | — | % | | | | |
Net income attributable to Methode Electronics, Inc. | | 1.4 | % | | 4.1 | % | | | | |
Net Sales. Consolidated net sales increased $11.8 million, or 11.9%, to $110.8 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011, from $99.0 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010. The Automotive segment net sales increased $12.7 million, or 25.4%, to $62.7 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2012, from $50.0 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The Interconnect segment net sales decreased $2.2 million, or 6.4%, to $32.4 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to $34.6 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The Power Products segment net sales increased $1.3 million, or 11.3%, to $12.8 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2012, as compared to $11.5 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The Other segment net sales increased $0.1 million, or 3.6%, to $2.9 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2012, as compared to $2.8 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Translation of foreign operations net sales for the three months ended July 30, 2011 increased reported net sales by $2.6 million or 2.3% due to average currency rates in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to the average currency rates in the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
Cost of Products Sold. Consolidated cost of products sold increased $11.3 million, or 14.2%, to $90.8 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011, compared to $79.5 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010. Consolidated cost of products sold as a percentage of sales were 81.9% for the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to 80.3% for the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The Automotive segment experienced additional costs for design, development, engineering and launch costs of $1.2 million related to new programs that will not begin production until fiscal 2013 and costs of $0.6 million related to a vendor's production and delivery issues. In addition, the Automotive segment experienced higher utility costs in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. The Power segment experienced increased costs of $0.6 million for new product development, specifically for an on board charger for an electric truck.
Gross Margins. Consolidated gross margins increased $0.5 million, or 2.6%, to $20.0 million for the three months
ended July 30, 2011, as compared to $19.5 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010. Gross margins as a percentage of net sales were 18.1% for the three months ended July 30, 2011, compared to 19.7% for the three months ended July 31, 2010. Gross margins as a percentage of sales decreased in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011, due to new program and product launch costs as well as higher utility costs and costs related to a vendor's production and delivery issues. In addition, gross margins were negatively impacted by increased sales of automotive product that has higher prime cost due to the current high percentage of purchased content, which was exacerbated by the vendor production and delivery issues. Gross margins were favorably impacted by the sales mix within the Interconnect segment.
Selling and Administrative Expenses. Selling and administrative expenses increased by $3.0 million, or 19.2%, to $18.6 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011, compared to $15.6 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010. The increase is primarily due to higher non-executive performance based compensation and severance of $1.4 million and stock award amortization of $0.8 million. Legal expenses related to the Delphi litigation decreased by $0.6 million to $0.8 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to $1.5 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. However, despite the decline in Delphi legal expenses, the total legal expense for the company was flat in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales increased to 16.8% for the three months ended July 30, 2011 from 15.8% for the three months ended July 31, 2010.
Other Income, Net. Other income, net decreased $0.8 million to zero for the three months ended July 30, 2011, as compared to $0.8 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010. Other income included income of $0.1 million and $1.2 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011 and July 31, 2010, respectively, related to life insurance policies in connection with an employee deferred compensation plan. All other amounts for both the first quarter of fiscal 2012 and the first quarter of fiscal 2011 relate to expenses for currency rate fluctuations. The functional currencies of these operations are the British pound, Chinese yuan, Euro, Indian Rupee, Mexican peso, Singapore dollar and Swiss Franc. Some foreign operations have transactions denominated in currencies other than their functional currencies, primarily sales in U.S. dollars and Euros, creating exchange rate sensitivities.
Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense decreased by $0.6 million to zero for the three months ended July 30, 2011, compared to $0.6 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010. During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, a benefit of $1.1 million was recorded relating to tax credits from our Malta facility, which was offset by $1.1 million of income tax expense related to foreign profits. The three months ended July 31, 2010 includes taxes on foreign profits of $0.5 million and $0.1 million related to Non-Federal U.S. taxes.
Net Income Attributable to Methode Electronics, Inc. Net income attributable to Methode Electronics, Inc. decreased $2.6 million to $1.5 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011, compared to $4.1 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010. The decrease is primarily due to higher expenses for new product development and product launches, non-executive performance based compensation and severance, stock award amortization, costs related to a vendor's production and delivery issues, utilities and lower life insurance proceeds, partially offset by higher net sales and gross margins and lower tax expense in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
Operating Segments
Automotive Segment Results
Below is a table summarizing results for the three months ended:
(in millions)
(“N/M” equals not meaningful)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | July 30, 2011 | | July 31, 2010 | | Net Change | | Net Change |
Net sales | | $ | 62.7 |
| | $ | 50.0 |
| | $ | 12.7 |
| | 25.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Cost of products sold | | 53.4 |
| | 39.9 |
| | 13.5 |
| | 33.8 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Gross margins | | 9.3 |
| | 10.1 |
| | (0.8 | ) | | (7.9 | )% |
| | | | | | | | |
Selling and administrative expenses | | 7.1 |
| | 7.2 |
| | (0.1 | ) | | (1.4 | )% |
| | | | | | | | |
Income from operations | | $ | 2.2 |
| | $ | 2.9 |
| | $ | (0.7 | ) | | (24.1 | )% |
| | | | | | | | |
Percent of sales: | | July 30, 2011 | | July 31, 2010 | | | | |
Net sales | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | | | | |
Cost of products sold | | 85.2 | % | | 79.8 | % | | | | |
Gross margins | | 14.8 | % | | 20.2 | % | | | | |
Selling and administrative expenses | | 11.3 | % | | 14.4 | % | | | | |
Income from operations | | 3.5 | % | | 5.8 | % | | | | |
Net Sales. Automotive segment net sales increased $12.7 million, or 25.4%, to $62.7 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011, from $50.0 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010. Net sales increased in North America, Europe and Asia by 123.4%, 18.8% and 8.0%, respectively in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The increase in North America is due to increased sales for our Ford Center Console Program. The increase in Asia is due to increases in our transmission lead-frame and steering angle sensor products and the increase in Europe is primarily due to the euro strengthening against the U.S. dollar. Included in net sales is other income, which consisted primarily of earnings from engineering design fees and royalties. Other income increased $0.2 million, or 28.6%, to $0.9 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011, from $0.7 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010. Translation of foreign operations net sales for the three months ended July 30, 2011 increased reported net sales by $2.6 million, or 4.3%, due to average currency rates in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to the average currency rates in the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
Cost of Products Sold. Automotive segment cost of products sold increased $13.5 million, or 33.8%, to $53.4 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011, from $39.9 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010. The Automotive segment cost of products sold as a percentage of sales were 85.2% in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to 79.8% in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, our North American operations experienced additional costs for design, development, engineering and launch costs of $1.2 million related to new programs that will not begin production until fiscal 2013, as well as costs of $0.6 million related to a vendor's production and delivery issues. In Europe, we experienced higher costs related to new product launches as well as higher costs for utilities during the first quarter of fiscal 2012, as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The increase in costs of products sold as a percentage of sales was also affected by increased sales of product that has a higher prime cost due to the current high percentage of purchased content, which was exacerbated by the vendor production and delivery issues.
Gross Margins. Automotive segment gross margins decreased $0.8 million, or 7.9%, to $9.3 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011, as compared to $10.1 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010. The Automotive segment gross margins as a percentage of net sales were 14.8% for the three months ended July 30, 2011, as compared to 20.2% for the
three months ended July 31, 2010. Gross margins as a percentage of sales decreased in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011, due to design, development, engineering and launch costs related to new programs and new product launches, as well as increased costs for utilities and costs related to a vendor's production and delivery issues. In addition, gross margins were negatively impacted in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 due to increased sales of product that has higher prime cost due to the current high percentage of purchased content.
Selling and Administrative Expenses. Selling and administrative expenses decreased $0.1 million, or 1.4%, to $7.1 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011, compared to $7.2 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010. Legal expenses related to the Delphi litigation decreased $0.6 million, to $0.8 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to $1.5 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The lower Delphi legal expenses were partially offset by non-executive performance based compensation for the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales were 11.3% for the three months ended July 30, 2011 and 14.4% for the three months ended July 31, 2010.
Income from Operations. Automotive segment income from operations decreased $0.7 million, to $2.2 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011, compared to $2.9 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010 due to expenses related to new programs and new product launches, higher non-executive performance based compensation, costs related to a vendor's production and delivery issues and utility expenses, partially offset with increased net sales and lower Delphi legal expenses for the three months ended July 30, 2011, compared to the three months ended July 31, 2010.
Interconnect Segment Results
Below is a table summarizing results for the three months ended:
(in millions)
(“N/M” equals not meaningful)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | July 30, 2011 | | July 31, 2010 | | Net Change | | Net Change |
Net sales | | $ | 32.4 |
| | $ | 34.6 |
| | $ | (2.2 | ) | | (6.4 | )% |
| | | | | | | | |
Cost of products sold | | 23.2 |
| | 25.4 |
| | (2.2 | ) | | (8.7 | )% |
| | | | | | | | |
Gross margins | | 9.2 |
| | 9.2 |
| | — |
| | — | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Selling and administrative expenses | | 4.9 |
| | 5.4 |
| | (0.5 | ) | | (9.3 | )% |
| | | | | | | | |
Income from operations | | 4.3 |
| | 3.8 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 13.2 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Percent of sales: | | July 30, 2011 | | July 31, 2010 | | | | |
Net sales | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | | | | |
Cost of products sold | | 71.6 | % | | 73.4 | % | | | | |
Gross margins | | 28.4 | % | | 26.6 | % | | | | |
Selling and administrative expenses | | 15.1 | % | | 15.6 | % | | | | |
Income from operations | | 13.3 | % | | 11.0 | % | | | | |
Net Sales. Interconnect segment net sales decreased $2.2 million, or 6.4%, to $32.4 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011, from $34.6 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010. Net sales decreased 14.7% in North America primarily due to weak sales for white goods products, partially offset by stronger sales for data and remote control devices in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Net sales in Europe increased 5.3% primarily due to higher sales for data and remote control devices, partially offset by no optical sales in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, due to the sale of the optical business in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011. Net sales in Asia increased 23.6% primarily due to higher sales of remote control devices.
Cost of Products Sold. Interconnect segment cost of products sold decreased $2.2 million, or 8.7%, to $23.2 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011, compared to $25.4 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010. Interconnect segment cost of products sold as a percentage of net sales decreased to 71.6% for the three months ended July 30, 2011, compared to 73.4% for the three months ended July 31, 2010. Even though sales volumes decreased in the first quarter of fiscal 2012 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011, cost of goods sold as a percentage of sales decreased due to the sales mix within the segment.
Gross Margins. Interconnect segment gross margins were $9.2 million for both the three months ended July 30, 2011 and for the three months ended July 31, 2010. Gross margins as a percentage of net sales increased to 28.4% for the three months ended July 30, 2011, from 26.6% for the three months ended July 31, 2010. The increase in gross margins as a percentage of net sales primarily relates to a favorable sales mix within the segment in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
Selling and Administrative Expenses. Selling and administrative expenses decreased $0.5 million, or 9.3%, to $4.9 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011, compared to $5.4 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010. Selling and administrative expenses decreased due to no selling and administrative expenses for our optical business, partially offset by higher bad debt expense in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased to 15.1% for the three months ended July 30, 2011, from 15.6% for the three months ended July 31, 2010.
Income from Operations. Interconnect segment income from operations increased $0.5 million, or 13.2%, to $4.3 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011, compared to $3.8 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010 due to favorable sales mix within the segment and lower selling and administrative expenses related to the optical business, partially offset by lower sales volumes and higher bad debt expenses in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
Power Products Segment Results
Below is a table summarizing results for the three months ended:
(in millions)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | July 30, 2011 | | July 31, 2010 | | Net Change | | Net Change |
Net sales | | $ | 12.8 |
| | $ | 11.5 |
| | $ | 1.3 |
| | 11.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Cost of products sold | | 10.8 |
| | 9.2 |
| | 1.6 |
| | 17.4 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Gross margins | | 2.0 |
| | 2.3 |
| | (0.3 | ) | | (13.0 | )% |
| | | | | | | | |
Selling and administrative expenses | | 1.8 |
| | 1.8 |
| | — |
| | — | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Income from operations | | $ | 0.2 |
| | $ | 0.5 |
| | $ | (0.3 | ) | | (60.0 | )% |
| | | | | | | | |
Percent of sales: | | July 30, 2011 | | July 31, 2010 | | | | |
Net sales | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | | | | |
Cost of products sold | | 84.4 | % | | 80.0 | % | | | | |
Gross margins | | 15.6 | % | | 20.0 | % | | | | |
Selling and administrative expenses | | 14.1 | % | | 15.7 | % | | | | |
Income from operations | | 1.6 | % | | 4.3 | % | | | | |
Net Sales. Power Products segment net sales increased $1.3 million, or 11.3%, to $12.8 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011, compared to $11.5 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010. Net sales increased in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011 by 11.6% in North America and by 12.2% in Asia. The
increase in North America was driven by higher demand for our busbar and heat sink products, partially offset by lower demand for our flexible cabling products. The increase in Asia was due to higher demand for our busbar products. Sales for busbar products in Europe were flat in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
Cost of Products Sold. Power Products segment cost of products sold increased $1.6 million, or 17.4%, to $10.8 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011, compared to $9.2 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010. The Power Products segment cost of products sold as a percentage of sales increased to 84.4% for the three months ended July 30, 2011, from 80.0% for the three months ended July 31, 2010. The increase in cost of products sold as a percentage of sales is due to increased costs for the product development, including $0.6 million for an on board charger for an electric truck in North America, partially offset by favorable sales mix in our heat sink and busbar products in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
Gross Margins. Power Products segment gross margins decreased $0.3 million, or 13.0%, to $2.0 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011, compared to $2.3 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010. Gross margins as a percentage of net sales decreased to 15.6% for the three months ended July 30, 2011 from 20.0% for the three months ended July 31, 2010. The decrease in gross margins as a percentage of sales is due to increased costs for product development in North America, partially offset by favorable sales mix for our heat sink and busbar products in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
Selling and Administrative Expenses. Selling and administrative expenses were $1.8 million for both the three months ended July 30, 2011 and for the three months ended July 31, 2010. Selling and administrative expenses increased due to new product development in North America, which were offset by lower non-executive performance based compensation in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased to 14.1% for the three months ended July 30, 2011 from 15.7% for the three months ended July 31, 2010.
Income From Operations. Power Products income from operations decreased $0.3 million, or 60.0%, to $0.2 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011, compared to $0.5 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010, due to increased expenses for new product development, partially offset by higher net sales and lower non-executive performance based compensation expense in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
Other Segment Results
Below is a table summarizing results for the three months ended:
(in millions)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | July 30, 2011 | | July 31, 2010 | | Net Change | | Net Change |
Net sales | | $ | 2.9 |
| | $ | 2.8 |
| | $ | 0.1 |
| | 3.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Cost of products sold | | 2.6 |
| | 2.7 |
| | (0.1 | ) | | (3.7 | )% |
| | | | | | | | |
Gross margins | | 0.3 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 200.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Selling and administrative expenses | | 1.3 |
| | 0.7 |
| | 0.6 |
| | 85.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Loss from operations | | $ | (1.0 | ) | | $ | (0.6 | ) | | $ | (0.4 | ) | | 66.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
Percent of sales: | | July 30, 2011 | | July 31, 2010 | | | | |
Net sales | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | | | | |
Cost of products sold | | 89.7 | % | | 96.4 | % | | | | |
Gross margins | | 10.3 | % | | 3.6 | % | | | | |
Selling and administrative expenses | | 44.8 | % | | 25.0 | % | | | | |
Loss from operations | | (34.5 | )% | | (21.4 | )% | | | | |
Net Sales. The Other segment net sales increased $0.1 million, or 3.6%, to $2.9 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011, compared to $2.8 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010. Net sales from our torque-sensing business increased 5.7% in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Net sales from our testing facilities were flat in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
Cost of Products Sold. Other segment cost of products sold decreased $0.1 million to $2.6 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011, compared to $2.7 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010. Cost of products sold as a percentage of sales decreased to 89.7% in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to 96.4% in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. The decrease in cost of goods sold as a percentage of sales is due to sales mix in our torque-sensing business.
Gross Margins. The Other segment gross margins increased $0.2 million, to $0.3 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011, compared to $0.1 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010. The increase is due to the increased net sales and favorable sales mix in our torque-sensing business in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
Selling and Administrative Expenses. Selling and administrative expenses increased $0.6 million, or 85.7%, to $1.3 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011, compared to $0.7 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010. The increase is primarily due to expenses related to higher non-executive performance based compensation and severance in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011. Selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased to 44.8% for the three months ended July 30, 2011, from 25.0% for the three months ended July 31, 2010.
Loss From Operations The Other segment loss from operations increased $0.4 million, or 66.7%, to $1.0 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011, compared to $0.6 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010. The loss increased due to expenses related to higher non-executive performance based compensation and severance, partially offset with higher sales and favorable sales mix in our torque-sensing business in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We believe our current world-wide cash balances together with expected future cash flows to be generated from operations will be sufficient to support current operations. However, due to the shifting of operations from the U.S. to foreign locations, a significant amount of cash and expected future cash flows are located outside of the U.S. No provision has been made, except for our Ireland business, for income taxes on undistributed net income of foreign operations, as we currently expect them to be indefinitely reinvested in our foreign operations. However, if we change our position and the cash is distributed back to the U.S., it may have an adverse affect on our U.S. federal and state taxes, by lowering our net operating loss positions or potentially creating a tax liability.
During fiscal 2011, we were awarded a next generation center stack program for multiple GM vehicle platforms as well as transmission lead-frame assemblies for GM transmissions. Both programs are expected to be manufactured in our plant in Monterrey, Mexico. We anticipate that these programs will require a significant amount of cash for the purchase of equipment, tooling and initial inventory as well as additional staffing for the development and launching of the programs. We expect to begin production and generate sales on these programs in fiscal 2013. Therefore, we anticipate our cash balances may decline due to the launching of these programs without a corresponding increase in sales.
On February 25, 2011, we entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and certain other financial institutions, which amends and restates our previous credit facility and extends the maturity to February 25, 2016. The new credit facility is in the aggregate principal amount of $75.0 million, with an option to increase the principal amount by an additional $25.0 million subject to customary conditions and approval of the lender(s)providing new commitment(s). The new credit facility provides for variable rates of interest based on the type of borrowing and the Company's debt to EBITDA financial ratio. The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement is guaranteed by certain of our U.S. subsidiaries. At July 30, 2011, we were in compliance with the covenants of the agreement. During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, we had borrowings of $27.0 million and interest payments of $0.1 million, under this credit facility. As of July 30, 2011, there were outstanding balances due against the credit facility of $27.0 million.
Cash Flow Operating Activities
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities increased $8.7 million to cash provided of $6.5 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011, compared to cash used of $2.2 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010. The increase in operating cash flow was primarily attributable to the changes in operating assets and liabilities in the first three
months of fiscal 2012, as compared to the first three months of fiscal 2011. Our trade accounts receivable, inventory and accounts payable in aggregate used $0.2 million of cash flow during the first three months of fiscal 2012, compared to cash used of $10.5 million for the first three months of fiscal 2011. The decreased use of cash reflects decreased accounts receivable levels due to timing of sales, partially offset by increased inventory levels, associated with increased business activity.
Cash Flow Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities increased $1.9 million to $4.6 million for the three months ended July 30, 2011, compared to $2.7 million for the three months ended July 31, 2010. Purchases of property, plant and equipment was $4.6 million for the first three months of fiscal 2012, compared to $2.0 million for the first three months of fiscal 2011. We invested $0.8 million in a new business in the first three months of fiscal 2011.
Cash Flow Financing Activities
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities increased $27.2 million to cash provided of $24.6 million in the first three months of fiscal 2012, compared to cash used of $2.6 million for the first three months of fiscal 2011. During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, the company had net borrowings against the credit facility of $27.0 million, compared to no borrowings in the first quarter of fiscal 2011. We paid dividends of $2.6 million for both the first three months of fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011. In addition, the first three months of fiscal 2012 included $0.2 million of proceeds for the exercise of stock options.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, other than operating leases and purchase obligations entered into in the normal course of business.
Item 3. Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Certain of our foreign operations enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency, primarily the U.S. dollar and the Euro. A 10% change in foreign currency exchange rates from balance sheet date levels could impact our income before income taxes by $3.0 million as of July 30, 2011 and $3.8 million as of April 30, 2011. We also have foreign currency exposure arising from the translation of our net equity investment in our foreign operations to U.S. dollars. We generally view our investments in foreign operations with functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar as long-term. The currencies to which we are exposed are the British pound, Chinese yuan, Euro, Indian Rupee, Mexican peso, and Singapore dollar. A 10% change in foreign currency exchange rates from balance sheet date levels could impact our net foreign investments by $18.0 million at July 30, 2011 and $17.9 million at April 30, 2011.
Item 4. Controls And Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, we performed an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s applicable rules and forms. As a result of this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended July 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 6. Exhibits
|
| | |
Exhibit Number | | Description |
31.1 | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer |
31.2 | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer |
32 | | Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | | | |
| | | METHODE ELECTRONICS, INC. |
| | | |
| | | By: | /s/ Douglas A. Koman |
| | | | Douglas A. Koman |
| | | | Chief Financial Officer |
| | | | (principal financial officer) |
| | | |
Dated: | September 1, 2011 | | |
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
| | |
Exhibit Number | | Description |
31.1 | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer |
31.2 | | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer |
32 | | Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |