form10q070211.htm
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
[X]
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended July 2, 2011
OR
[ ]
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 1-10245
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Nevada
|
95-1480559
|
(State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
2500 McClellan Avenue, Suite 350, Pennsauken, New Jersey 08109-4613
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(856) 356-4500
(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES [X] NO [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES [X] NO [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. (See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer [ ]
|
Accelerated Filer [ ]
|
Non-Accelerated Filer [ ]
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller Reporting Company [X]
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES [ ] NO [X]
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of the Registrant's class of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Common Stock, $0.05 par value, 13,046,460 shares outstanding as of August 9, 2011.
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
Item 1.
|
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of July 2, 2011 (Unaudited)
and January 1, 2011
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income for the Thirteen and Twenty-Six Week Periods Ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
for the Twenty-Six Week Period Ended July 2, 2011 and Unaudited
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the
Twenty-Six Week Periods Ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Twenty-Six Week
Periods Ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
|
7
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
|
21
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
36
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls and Procedures
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal Proceedings
|
37
|
|
|
|
Item 1A.
|
Risk Factors
|
37
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
37
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
|
37
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
[Removed and Reserved]
|
37
|
|
|
|
Item 5.
|
Other Information
|
37
|
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
Exhibits
|
38
|
|
|
Signatures
|
39
|
ITEM 1.
|
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
July 2, 2011 and January 1, 2011
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
July 2,
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$23,488
|
|
$24,704
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
43,162
|
|
41,213
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
2,425
|
|
1,841
|
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
827
|
|
827
|
|
|
Assets of discontinued operations
|
2
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
69,904
|
|
68,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
2,925
|
|
3,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
195
|
|
183
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
7,319
|
|
7,319
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
264
|
|
325
|
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
3,035
|
|
3,303
|
|
|
|
Total other assets
|
10,813
|
|
11,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
$83,642
|
|
$83,012
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
$5,106
|
|
$6,004
|
|
|
Accrued payroll and related costs
|
6,600
|
|
6,950
|
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
133
|
|
39
|
|
|
Liabilities of discontinued operations
|
13
|
|
45
|
|
|
Contingent consideration
|
177
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
12,029
|
|
13,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent consideration
|
189
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
no shares issued or outstanding
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.05 par value; 40,000,000 shares authorized;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,265,712 shares issued and 13,021,774 shares outstanding at
July 2, 2011 and 13,220,445 shares issued and 13,171,048 shares outstanding at January 1, 2011
|
663
|
|
661
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
108,026
|
|
107,817
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
1,512
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
(37,662
|
)
|
(40,079
|
)
|
|
Treasury stock (243,938 shares at July 2, 2011 and
49,397 shares at January 1, 2011, at cost)
|
(1,115
|
)
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
Total stockholders' equity
|
71,424
|
|
69,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$83,642
|
|
$83,012
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Thirteen and Twenty-Six Week Periods Ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Thirteen Weeks Ended
|
|
Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
|
|
|
July 2,
2011
|
|
July 3,
2010
|
|
July 2,
2011
|
|
July 3,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
$36,514
|
|
$42,811
|
|
$75,220
|
|
$88,140
|
|
Cost of services
|
26,054
|
|
30,354
|
|
53,709
|
|
63,338
|
|
Gross profit
|
10,460
|
|
12,457
|
|
21,511
|
|
24,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
8,158
|
|
9,351
|
|
16,842
|
|
19,264
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
279
|
|
336
|
|
588
|
|
680
|
|
|
8,437
|
|
9,687
|
|
17,430
|
|
19,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
2,023
|
|
2,770
|
|
4,081
|
|
4,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (expense) income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net and other
|
(8
|
)
|
(12
|
)
|
(16
|
)
|
(50
|
)
|
|
Gain on foreign currency transactions
|
32
|
|
18
|
|
19
|
|
11
|
|
|
24
|
|
6
|
|
3
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before
income taxes
|
2,047
|
|
2,776
|
|
4,084
|
|
4,819
|
|
Income tax expense from continuing operations
|
805
|
|
1,126
|
|
1,667
|
|
742
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
1,242
|
|
1,650
|
|
2,417
|
|
4,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations,
net of taxes
|
-
|
|
68
|
|
-
|
|
(586
|
)
|
Net income
|
$1,242
|
|
$1,718
|
|
$2,417
|
|
$3,491
|
|
Basic net earnings per share data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
$0.10
|
|
$0.13
|
|
$0.18
|
|
$0.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations,
net of tax benefit
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
($0.04
|
)
|
|
Net income
|
$0.10
|
|
$0.13
|
|
$0.18
|
|
$0.27
|
|
Diluted net earnings per share data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
$0.09
|
|
$0.13
|
|
$0.18
|
|
$0.31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations,
net of tax benefit
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
($0.04
|
)
|
|
Net income
|
$0.09
|
|
$0.13
|
|
$0.18
|
|
$0.27
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Twenty-Six Week Period Ended July 2, 2011
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
|
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
|
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Issued
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2011
|
13,220,445
|
|
$661
|
|
$107,817
|
|
$1,415
|
|
($40,079
|
)
|
49,397
|
|
($206
|
)
|
$69,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of stock under
employee stock purchase plan
|
22,267
|
|
1
|
|
83
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
84
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustment
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
97
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
97
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
23,000
|
|
1
|
|
76
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
77
|
|
Stock based compensation expense
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
50
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
50
|
|
Common stock repurchase
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
194,541
|
|
(909
|
)
|
(909
|
)
|
Net income
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
2,417
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
2,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, July 2, 2011
|
13,265,712
|
|
$663
|
|
$108,026
|
|
$1,512
|
|
($37,662
|
)
|
243,938
|
|
($1,115
|
)
|
$71,424
|
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Twenty-Six Week Periods Ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
July 2,
|
|
July 3,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
$2,417
|
|
$3,491
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
97
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Comprehensive income
|
$2,514
|
|
$3,476
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Twenty-Six Week Periods Ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
July 2,
2011
|
|
July 3,
2010
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
$2,417
|
|
$3,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
588
|
|
719
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of fixed assets of discontinued operations
|
-
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
50
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
(Reduction of) provision for allowance for doubtful accounts
|
(35
|
)
|
179
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax expense
|
267
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
(1,812
|
)
|
1,139
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
(434
|
)
|
(743
|
)
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
(948
|
)
|
735
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued payroll and related costs
|
(375
|
)
|
1,682
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
(24
|
)
|
521
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
(2,723
|
)
|
4,668
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
(306
|
)
|
8,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment acquired
|
(158
|
)
|
(28
|
)
|
|
(Increase) decrease in deposits
|
(12
|
)
|
40
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
(170
|
)
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of stock for employee stock purchase plan
|
84
|
|
73
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
77
|
|
-
|
|
|
Common stock repurchases
|
(909
|
)
|
(114
|
)
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
(748
|
)
|
(41
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
9
|
|
(156
|
)
|
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
(1,216
|
)
|
7,974
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
24,704
|
|
10,942
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$23,488
|
|
$18,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
$31
|
|
$62
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
$1,681
|
|
$1,028
|
|
Non-cash investing activities relating to acquisition purchase price
adjustment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease goodwill
|
$ -
|
|
$840
|
|
|
Decrease accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
$ -
|
|
$313
|
|
|
Decrease contingent consideration
|
$ -
|
|
$527
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)
|
The accompanying consolidated interim financial statements of RCM Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries (“RCM” or the “Company”) are unaudited. The year-end consolidated balance sheet was derived from audited statements but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. These statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining to reports on Form 10-Q and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended January 1, 2011 included in the Company’s Annual Report Form 10-K for such period. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations.
The consolidated financial statements for the unaudited interim periods presented include all adjustments (consisting only of normal, recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows for such interim periods.
Results for the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the full year.
In March 2010, the Company closed its Oracle business unit located in southern California. The closed business unit sold Oracle software applications and provided implementation, hosting and maintenance services for the suite of Oracle and related software applications. In September 2010, the Company sold its light industrial and clerical staffing business located in southern California and doing business under the name Intertec. See Note 15 “Discontinued Operations” to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report for further details of these discontinued operations. Such businesses have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
The Company follows a 52/53 week fiscal reporting calendar ending on the Saturday closest to December 31. The fiscal year ended January 1, 2011 was a 52-week reporting year. The second fiscal quarters of 2011 and 2010 ended on the following dates, respectively:
Period Ended
|
Weeks in Quarter
|
Weeks in Year to Date
|
July 2, 2011
|
Thirteen
|
Twenty-Six
|
July 3, 2010
|
Thirteen
|
Twenty-Six
|
3.
|
Use of Estimates and Uncertainties
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The Company uses estimates to calculate an allowance for doubtful accounts on its accounts receivables. These estimates can be significant to the operating results and financial position of the Company.
The Company has risk participation arrangements with respect to workers compensation and health care insurance. The amounts included in the Company’s costs related to this risk participation are estimated and can vary based on changes in assumptions, the Company’s claims experience or the providers included in the associated insurance programs.
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)
|
3.
|
Use of Estimates and Uncertainties (Continued)
|
The Company can be affected by a variety of factors including uncertainty relating to the performance of the general economy, competition, demand for the Company’s services, adverse litigation and claims and the hiring, training and retention of key employees.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company’s carrying value of financial instruments, consisting primarily of accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximates fair value due to their liquidity or their short-term nature. The Company does not have derivative products in place to manage risks related to foreign currency fluctuations for its foreign operations or for interest rate changes.
The Company’s accounts receivable are comprised as follows:
|
July 2,
2011
|
|
January 1,
2011
|
|
Billed
|
$32,428
|
|
$31,265
|
|
Accrued and unbilled
|
2,191
|
|
3,381
|
|
Work-in-progress
|
9,800
|
|
7,858
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts and sales discounts
|
(1,257
|
)
|
(1,291
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
$43,162
|
|
$41,213
|
|
The Company entered into an agreement to provide among other things construction management services. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company: a) engaged subcontractors to provide construction services; b) earns a fixed percentage of the fee and c) assumes no ownership or risks of inventory, therefore substantially acts as an agent. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company is not required to pay the subcontractor until a corresponding payment from the Company’s client is received. Such pass-through amounts as of July 2, 2011 are not material.
5.
|
Property and Equipment
|
Property and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated on the straight-line method at rates calculated to provide for retirement of assets at the end of their estimated useful lives. The annual rates are 20% for computer hardware and software as well as furniture and office equipment. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the estimated life of the asset or the lease term.
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)
|
5.
|
Property and Equipment (Continued)
|
Property and equipment are comprised of the following:
|
July 2,
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
Equipment and furniture
|
$2,682
|
|
$2,734
|
|
Computers and systems
|
5,615
|
|
5,869
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
1,036
|
|
1,064
|
|
|
9,333
|
|
9,667
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
6,408
|
|
6,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
$2,925
|
|
$3,295
|
|
The Company periodically writes off fully depreciated assets. The company wrote off fully depreciated assets of $491 and $955 for the twenty-six week periods ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010, respectively.
General
The Company has acquired numerous companies throughout its history and those acquisitions have generally included significant contingent consideration. In general, the future contingent consideration amounts have fallen into one of two categories: (a) Deferred Consideration - fixed amounts due if the acquisition achieves a base level of earnings which has been determined at the time of acquisition and (b) Earnouts – amounts payable that are not fixed and are based on the growth in excess of the base level earnings.
Future Contingent Consideration
The Company has one active acquisition agreement relating to the acquisition of the assets of Project Solutions Group, Inc. (“PSG”) in 2009 whereby future contingent consideration may be earned and paid. The Company, at the time of the PSG acquisition, determined that the estimated net present fair value of the total future contingent consideration (Deferred Consideration and Earnouts) associated with the PSG acquisition was approximately $0.4 million. The amount actually paid, if any, may substantially exceed the estimated net present fair value.
The Company’s outstanding Deferred Consideration obligations potentially due after July 2, 2011, which relate to the PSG acquisition, could result in the following maximum Deferred Consideration payments:
Year Ending
|
|
Amount
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
$144
|
December 29, 2012
|
|
164
|
December 28, 2013
|
|
184
|
Maximum deferred consideration
|
|
$492
|
The Company cannot predict future Deferred Consideration payments with any certainty. Earnouts, if any, cannot be estimated with any certainty and as such are not included above. Any Earnouts paid, if any, are not likely to be material. The Company’s estimate of the fair value of the total future contingent consideration to be paid to PSG is $366 at January 1, 2011 and July 2, 2011.
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)
|
The Company is required to perform a goodwill impairment test on at least an annual basis. Application of the goodwill impairment test requires significant judgments, including estimation of future cash flows, which are dependent on internal forecasts, estimation of the long-term rate of growth for the businesses, the useful life over which cash flows will occur and determination of the Company’s weighted average cost of capital. Changes in these estimates and assumptions could materially affect the determination of fair value and/or conclusions on goodwill impairment for each reporting unit. The Company conducts its annual goodwill impairment test as of the last day of the Company's fiscal November each year, or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist. The Company compares the fair value of each of its reporting units to their respective carrying values, including related goodwill. There were no triggering events during the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011 that indicated a need to perform the impairment test prior to the Company's annual test date.
The Company evaluates long-lived assets and intangible assets with definite lives for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. When the Company determines that it is probable that undiscounted future cash flows will not be sufficient to recover an asset’s carrying amount, the asset is written down to its fair value. Assets to be disposed of by sale, if any, are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell.
The following table reflects the components of intangible assets, excluding goodwill:
|
Information
Technology
|
|
Engineering
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2011
|
$315
|
|
$10
|
|
$325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangibles during the
twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011
|
51
|
|
10
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of July 2, 2011
|
$264
|
|
$ -
|
|
$264
|
|
The Company and its subsidiaries are party to a loan agreement with Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, amended and restated effective February 20, 2009, which provides for a $15 million revolving credit facility and includes a sub-limit of $5.0 million for letters of credit (the “Revolving Credit Facility”). The Revolving Credit Facility was amended on July 21, 2011 to extend the maturity date to October 31, 2011. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at one of two alternative rates, as selected by the Company at each incremental borrowing. These alternatives are: (i) LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate), plus applicable margin, or (ii) the agent bank's prime rate. The Company also pays unused line fees based on the amount of the Revolving Credit Facility that is not drawn.
All borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility are collateralized by all of the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries and a pledge of the stock of its subsidiaries. The Revolving Credit Facility also contains various financial and non-financial covenants, such as restrictions on the Company’s ability to pay dividends. The Revolving Credit Facility expires October 31, 2011. The Company intends to seek to extend or replace the Revolving Credit Facility prior to such time if it is determined that doing so would be in alignment with the Company’s financing needs.
There were no borrowings during the twenty-six week periods ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010. At July 2, 2011 and January 1, 2011, there were letters of credit outstanding for $0.9 million. At July 2, 2011, the Company had availability for additional borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility of $14.1 million.
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)
|
Both basic and diluted earnings per share for all periods are calculated based on the reported earnings in the Company’s consolidated statements of income.
The number of common shares used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share for the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010 was determined as follows:
|
|
Thirteen Week Periods Ended
|
|
Twenty-Six Week Periods Ended
|
|
|
July 2,
2011
|
|
July 3,
2010
|
|
July 2,
2011
|
|
July 3,
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares
outstanding
|
13,059,595
|
|
12,984,539
|
|
13,072,042
|
|
12,991,859
|
Dilutive effect of outstanding stock
options
|
240,513
|
|
164,613
|
|
195,940
|
|
104,176
|
Dilutive shares
|
13,300,108
|
|
13,149,152
|
|
13,267,982
|
|
13,096,035
|
There were 78,900 and 970,900 options not included in the calculation of common stock equivalents because the exercise price of the options exceeded the average market price during the twenty-six week periods ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010, respectively. There were 47,500 and 803,400 options not included in the calculation of common stock equivalents because the exercise price of the options exceeded the average market price during the thirteen week periods ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010, respectively.
Unissued shares of common stock were reserved for the following purposes:
|
July 2,
2011
|
|
January 1,
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of options outstanding
|
1,035,094
|
|
1,101,594
|
|
Future grants of options or shares
|
435,600
|
|
415,600
|
|
Shares reserved for employee stock purchase plan
|
298,097
|
|
320,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
1,768,791
|
|
1,837,558
|
|
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)
|
11.
|
Stock Based Compensation
|
At July 2, 2011, the Company had five stock-based employee compensation plans. The Company measures the fair value of stock options, if and when granted, based on the Black-Scholes method and using the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Grants vest over periods ranging from one to three years and expire within 10 years of issuance. Stock-based compensation expense related to awards is amortized in accordance with applicable vesting periods using the straight-line method.
Stock-based compensation expense of $50 and $167 was recognized for the twenty-six week periods ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010, respectively.
No options were granted during the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011 and 20,000 options were granted during the twenty-six week period ended July 3, 2010.
Activity regarding outstanding options for the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011 is as follows:
|
All Stock Options Outstanding
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
|
|
Options outstanding as of January 1, 2011
|
1,101,594
|
|
$4.10
|
|
Options exercised
|
(23,000
|
)
|
$3.36
|
|
Options forfeited/cancelled
|
(43,500
|
)
|
$3.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding as of July 2, 2011
|
1,035,094
|
|
$4.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding price range at July 2, 2011
|
$0.95 - $9.81
|
|
$4.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable as of July 2, 2011
|
862,900
|
|
$4.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic value of outstanding stock options as of July 2, 2011
|
$1,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic value of stock options exercised for the twenty-six
week period ended July 2, 2011
|
$43
|
|
|
|
Incentive Stock Option Plans
1992 Incentive Stock Option Plan (the 1992 Plan)
The 1992 Plan, approved by the Company’s stockholders in April 1992 and amended in April 1998, provided for the issuance of up to 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock per individual to officers, directors, and key employees of the Company and its subsidiaries through February 13, 2002, at which time the 1992 Plan expired. The options issued were intended to be incentive stock options pursuant to Section 422A of the Internal Revenue Code. The option terms were not permitted to exceed 10 years and the exercise price was not permitted to be less than 100% of the fair market value of the shares at the time of grant. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors determined the vesting period at the time of grant for each of these options. As of July 2, 2011, options to purchase 57,455 shares of common stock granted under the 1992 Plan were outstanding.
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)
|
11.
|
Stock Based Compensation (Continued)
|
Incentive Stock Option Plans (Continued)
1994 Non-employee Directors Stock Option Plan (the 1994 Plan)
The 1994 Plan, approved by the Company’s stockholders in May 1994 and amended in April 1998, provided for the issuance of up to 110,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to non-employee directors of the Company through February 19, 2004, at which time the 1994 Plan expired. Options granted under the 1994 Plan were granted at fair market value at the date of grant, and the exercise of options is contingent upon service as a director for a period of one year. Options granted under the 1994 Plan terminate when an optionee ceases to be a director of the Company. As of July 2, 2011, options to purchase 20,000 shares of common stock granted under the 1994 Plan were outstanding.
1996 Executive Stock Option Plan (the 1996 Plan)
The 1996 Plan, approved by the Company’s stockholders in August 1996 and amended in April 1999, provided for the issuance of up to 1,250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to officers and key employees of the Company and its subsidiaries through January 1, 2006, at which time the 1996 Plan expired. Options are generally granted at fair market value at the date of grant. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors determines the vesting period at the time of grant. As of July 2, 2011, options to purchase 577,545 shares of common stock granted under the 1996 Plan were outstanding.
2000 Employee Stock Incentive Plan (the 2000 Plan)
The 2000 Plan, approved by the Company’s stockholders in April 2001, provided for the issuance of up to 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to officers and key employees of the Company and its subsidiaries or consultants and advisors utilized by the Company. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors may award incentive stock options or non-qualified stock options, as well as stock appreciation rights, and determines the vesting period at the time of grant. As of July 2, 2011, options to purchase 255,194 shares of common stock granted under the 2000 Plan were outstanding.
The 1992 Plan, 1994 Plan, 1996 Plan and 2000 Plan are expired and therefore no shares are available for grant thereunder.
2007 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (the 2007 Plan)
The 2007 Plan, approved by the Company’s stockholders in June 2007, provides for the issuance of up to 700,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to officers, non-employee directors, employees of the Company and its subsidiaries or consultants and advisors utilized by the Company. No more than 350,000 shares of common stock in the aggregate may be issued pursuant to grants of stock awards, stock units, performance shares and other stock-based awards. No more than 300,000 shares of common stock with respect to awards may be granted to any individual during any fiscal year. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors determines the vesting period at the time of grant. As of July 2, 2011, 435,600 shares of common stock were available for future grants under the 2007 Plan, and options to purchase 124,900 shares of common stock granted under the 2007 Plan were outstanding.
As of July 2, 2011, the Company had approximately $82 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested awards granted under the Company’s various stock-based plans, which the Company expects to recognize over approximately a three-year period. These amounts do not include the cost of any additional options that may be granted in future periods or reflect any potential changes in the Company’s forfeiture rate.
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)
|
11.
|
Stock Based Compensation (Continued)
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The Company implemented the 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan with stockholder approval, effective January 1, 2001. Such Plan was subsequently amended, pursuant to stockholder approval where required, effective June 18, 2009 and September 16, 2009 (the 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as so amended, the “Purchase Plan”). Under the Purchase Plan, employees meeting certain specific employment qualifications are eligible to participate and can purchase shares of common stock semi-annually through payroll deductions at the lower of 85% of the fair market value of the stock at the commencement or end of the offering period. The purchase plan permits eligible employees to purchase shares of common stock through payroll deductions for up to 10% of qualified compensation. The Company has two offering periods in the Purchase Plan coinciding with the Company’s first two fiscal quarters and the last two fiscal quarters. Actual shares are issued on the first day of the subsequent offering period for the prior offering period payroll deductions. The number of shares issued at the beginning of the current period (as of January 2, 2011) was 22,267. As of July 2, 2011, there were 298,097 shares available for issuance under the Purchase Plan.
|
12.
|
Treasury Stock Transactions
|
Our Board of Directors instituted a share repurchase program in February 2010, which authorized the repurchase of up to $7.5 million of the Company’s outstanding shares of our common stock at prevailing market prices, from time to time over the subsequent 12 months. In February 2011, the share repurchase program was extended through February 2013. During the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011, the Company repurchased 194,541 shares at a total cost of approximately $909, or an average price of $4.68 per share. Since the inception of its share repurchase program and through July 2, 2011, the Company has purchased 243,938 shares at a total cost of approximately $1,115, or an average price of $4.57.
13.
|
New Accounting Standards
|
There have been no recent accounting pronouncements or changes in accounting pronouncements during the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011, as compared to the recent accounting pronouncements described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 1, 2011, that are of material significance, or have potential material significance, to the Company.
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)
|
The Company follows “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,” which establishes standards for companies to report information about operating segments, geographic areas and major customers. The accounting policies of each segment are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies (see Note 1 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2011.)
In March 2010, the Company closed its Oracle business unit located in southern California. The closed business unit sold Oracle software applications and provided implementation, hosting and maintenance services for the suite of Oracle and related software applications. In September 2010, the Company sold its light industrial and clerical staffing business located in southern California and doing business under the name Intertec. See Note 15 “Discontinued Operations” to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report for further details of these discontinued operations. Such businesses have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
In prior financial statement filings, the Intertec business unit was grouped with its Specialty Health Care business unit in the Company’s formerly named Commercial Services segment. All current and prior periods have been restated to include only the Specialty Health Care segment operating results.
Segment operating income includes selling, general and administrative expenses directly attributable to that segment as well as charges for allocating corporate costs to each of the operating segments. The following tables reflect the results of the segments consistent with the Company’s management system:
Thirteen Week Period Ended
July 2, 2011
|
Information
Technology
|
|
Engineering
|
|
Specialty Health Care
|
|
Corporate
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$13,442
|
|
$15,838
|
|
$7,234
|
|
$ -
|
|
$36,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services
|
9,574
|
|
11,738
|
|
4,742
|
|
-
|
|
26,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
3,658
|
|
2,822
|
|
1,678
|
|
-
|
|
8,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
109
|
|
134
|
|
36
|
|
-
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
$101
|
|
$1,144
|
|
$778
|
|
$ -
|
|
$2,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
$15,543
|
|
$26,756
|
|
$10,375
|
|
$30,968
|
|
$83,642
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
$2
|
|
$75
|
|
$ -
|
|
$14
|
|
$91
|
|
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)
|
14.
|
Segment Information (Continued)
|
Thirteen Week Period Ended
July 3, 2010
|
Information
Technology
|
|
Engineering
|
|
Specialty Health Care
|
|
Corporate
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$19,222
|
|
$16,351
|
|
$7,238
|
|
$ -
|
|
$42,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services
|
13,508
|
|
12,184
|
|
4,662
|
|
-
|
|
30,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
4,857
|
|
2,624
|
|
1,870
|
|
-
|
|
9,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
129
|
|
172
|
|
35
|
|
-
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
$728
|
|
$1,371
|
|
$671
|
|
$ -
|
|
$2,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
$18,230
|
|
$25,381
|
|
$9,008
|
|
$30,915
|
|
$83,534
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
$11
|
|
$4
|
|
$ -
|
|
$ -
|
|
$15
|
|
Twenty-Six Week Period Ended
July 2, 2011
|
Information
Technology
|
|
Engineering
|
|
Specialty Health Care
|
|
Corporate
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$28,687
|
|
$32,005
|
|
$14,528
|
|
$ -
|
|
$75,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services
|
20,577
|
|
23,454
|
|
9,678
|
|
-
|
|
53,709
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
7,550
|
|
5,741
|
|
3,551
|
|
-
|
|
16,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
227
|
|
290
|
|
71
|
|
-
|
|
588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
$333
|
|
$2,520
|
|
$1,228
|
|
$ -
|
|
$4,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
$15,543
|
|
$26,756
|
|
$10,375
|
|
$30,968
|
|
$83,642
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
$2
|
|
$81
|
|
$ -
|
|
$75
|
|
$158
|
|
Twenty-Six Week Period Ended
July 3, 2010
|
Information
Technology
|
|
Engineering
|
|
Specialty Health Care
|
|
Corporate
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$39,024
|
|
$35,053
|
|
$14,063
|
|
$ -
|
|
$88,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services
|
27,979
|
|
26,248
|
|
9,111
|
|
-
|
|
63,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
10,087
|
|
5,504
|
|
3,673
|
|
-
|
|
19,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
260
|
|
352
|
|
68
|
|
-
|
|
680
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
$698
|
|
$2,949
|
|
$1,211
|
|
$ -
|
|
$4,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
$18,230
|
|
$25,381
|
|
$9,008
|
|
$30,915
|
|
$83,534
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
$11
|
|
$11
|
|
$ -
|
|
$6
|
|
$28
|
|
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)
|
14.
|
Segment Information (Continued)
|
Revenues from continuing operations reported for each operating segment are from external customers.
The Company is domiciled in the United States and its segments operate in the United States, Canada, Puerto Rico and Ireland. Revenues by geographic area for the twenty-six week periods ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
Thirteen Week Periods Ended
|
|
Twenty-Six Week Periods Ended
|
|
|
|
July 2, 2011
|
|
July 3, 2010
|
|
July 2, 2011
|
|
July 3, 2010
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. S.
|
$29,844
|
|
$35,151
|
|
$61,547
|
|
$71,551
|
|
|
Canada
|
6,137
|
|
6,717
|
|
12,615
|
|
14,877
|
|
|
Puerto Rico
|
521
|
|
848
|
|
1,036
|
|
1,617
|
|
|
Ireland
|
12
|
|
95
|
|
22
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
$36,514
|
|
$42,811
|
|
$75,220
|
|
$88,140
|
|
Total assets by geographic area as of the reported periods are as follows:
|
July 2,
2011
|
|
January 1,
2011
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. S.
|
$68,727
|
|
$69,931
|
|
|
Canada
|
13,848
|
|
11,734
|
|
|
Puerto Rico
|
735
|
|
1,010
|
|
|
Ireland
|
332
|
|
337
|
|
|
|
$83,642
|
|
$83,012
|
|
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)
|
15.
|
Discontinued Operations
|
In September 2010, the Company sold the fixed and intangible assets associated with its light industrial and clerical staffing business located in southern California and doing business under the name Intertec. Accounts receivable and certain short term liabilities of this business unit were retained by the Company. The Company received cash of $400 and recognized a gain of $143 on the sale of Intertec during the 2010 fiscal year. The Intertec business unit had been grouped with its Specialty Health Care business unit in the Company’s formerly named Commercial Services segment. The Company may experience continued operating losses from the clerical staffing business if future workers compensation losses exceed the Company’s reserves but the Company does not presently anticipate any material losses, if any.
In March 2010, the Company closed its Oracle business unit located in southern California. The closed business unit, included in the Company’s Information Technology segment, sold Oracle software applications and provided implementation, hosting and maintenance services for the suite of Oracle and related software applications. The Company may experience continued losses in its Oracle business unit as a result of representations and warranties made in association with certain completed projects in excess of accruals but the Company does not anticipate any material losses, if any.
The Intertec and Oracle business units have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
The net assets and liabilities of discontinued operations consist of:
|
July 2,
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
2011
|
|
2011
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
$2
|
|
$2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
$2
|
|
$2
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
$13
|
|
$45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
$13
|
|
$45
|
|
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)
|
15.
|
Discontinued Operations (Continued)
|
The loss from discontinued operations consists of:
|
Thirteen
Week Periods Ended
|
|
Twenty-Six
Week Periods Ended
|
|
|
July 2,
2011
|
|
July 3,
2010
|
|
July 2,
2011
|
|
July 3,
2010
|
|
Revenues
|
$ -
|
|
$4,066
|
|
$ -
|
|
$8,264
|
|
Cost of services
|
-
|
|
3,611
|
|
-
|
|
7,735
|
|
Gross profit
|
-
|
|
455
|
|
-
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
-
|
|
331
|
|
-
|
|
1,269
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
-
|
|
5
|
|
-
|
|
36
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of fixed assets
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
269
|
|
|
-
|
|
336
|
|
-
|
|
1,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
-
|
|
119
|
|
-
|
|
(1,045
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (expense) benefit
|
-
|
|
(51
|
)
|
-
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
$ -
|
|
$68
|
|
$ -
|
|
($586
|
)
|
The effective income tax rate for income from continuing operations was 40.8% for the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011. The current period effective tax rate is comprised of an estimated effective tax rate of 43.4% in the United States offset by an effective tax rate of 27.2% in Canada (due to income tax abatements in Canada in 2011). The Company also experienced an approximate loss of $0.1 million in Ireland whereby the net effect of a full valuation allowance yielded no tax benefit and increased the Company’s consolidated effective tax rate.
For the twenty-six week period ended July 3, 2010, the Company recognized a nonrecurring current tax benefit of $1.1 million due to the discrete nature of the goodwill and intangible asset tax deduction for the liquidation of its Oracle business unit subsidiary described in Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company recognized an impairment of the book goodwill and intangible assets associated with this subsidiary in 2008. This was offset by regular tax provision expense of $1.9 million on current taxable income from continuing operations, resulting in a cumulative income tax benefit of approximately $0.8 million (not including the tax benefit from discontinued operations). Excluding the tax benefit from the nonrecurring goodwill and intangible asset tax deduction, the Company’s recognized effective tax rate for the twenty-six week period ended July 3, 2010 was 38.2%.
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts, unless otherwise indicated)
|
From time to time, the Company is a defendant or plaintiff in various legal actions which arise in the normal course of business. As such, the Company is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse outcomes to these matters as well as potential ranges of losses and possible recoveries. The Company may not be covered by insurance as it pertains to some or all of these matters. A determination of the amount of the provision required for these commitments and contingencies, if any, which would be charged to earnings, is made after careful analysis of each matter. Once established, a provision may change in the future due to new developments or changes in circumstances, and could increase or decrease the Company’s earnings in the period that the changes are made. Included in the Company’s accounts payable and accrued expenses is a provision for losses from legal matters aggregating approximately $0.4 million and $0.6 million as of July 2, 2011 and January 1, 2011, respectively. Asserted claims in these matters seek approximately $7.3 million in damages as of July 2, 2011.
The Company is also subject to other pending legal proceedings and claims that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of its business, which may not be covered by insurance.
18.
|
Stockholder Rights Plan
|
On June 8, 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a stockholder rights plan and declared a dividend distribution of one Right for each outstanding share of Common Stock of the Company. Each Right entitles the holder to purchase from the Company a unit consisting of one one-hundredth of a share (a “Unit”) of the Series A Junior Participating Preferred Shares of the Company. The dividend was declared on June 8, 2010 (the "Rights Dividend Declaration Date") to stockholders of record as of the close of business on June 21, 2010 (the “Record Date”). Each Right will entitle the holder to purchase from the Company, upon the occurrence of certain events, one Unit at a purchase price of $13.50.
Generally, if any person or group acquires beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the Company's outstanding Common Stock (“Stock Acquisition”), each Right (other than Rights held by such acquiring person or group) will be exercisable at the $13.50 purchase price. Upon the acquisition of 50% of the Company, the Board may exchange all or part of the Rights for Common Shares having a value equal to the spread between the value of the Common Shares issuable upon exercise of a Right and the exercise price. At any time until ten days following the Stock Acquisition date, the Company may redeem the Rights at a price of $.001 per Right. The Rights expired on June 21, 2011; the Board could adopt a similar plan in the future should it deem it to be in the best interest of the Company.
ITEM 2.
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act Safe Harbor Statement
Certain statements included herein and in other reports and public filings made by RCM Technologies, Inc. (“RCM” or the “Company”) are forward-looking within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements regarding the adoption by businesses of new technology solutions; the use by businesses of outsourced solutions, such as those offered by the Company, in connection with such adoption; the Company’s business initiatives and growth strategies; and the outcome of litigation (at both the trial and appellate levels) involving the Company. Readers are cautioned that such forward-looking statements, as well as others made by the Company, which may be identified by words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “continue,” “estimate,” “project,” “intend,” “believe,” and similar expressions, are only predictions and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause the Company's actual results and financial position to differ materially from such statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, without limitation: (i) unemployment and general economic conditions affecting the provision of information technology and engineering services and solutions and the placement of temporary staffing personnel; (ii) the Company's ability to continue to attract, train and retain personnel qualified to meet the requirements of its clients; (iii) the Company's ability to identify appropriate acquisition candidates, complete such acquisitions and successfully integrate acquired businesses; (iv) uncertainties regarding pro forma financial information and the underlying assumptions relating to acquisitions and acquired businesses; (v) uncertainties regarding amounts of deferred consideration and earnout payments to become payable to former shareholders of acquired businesses; (vi) adverse effects on the market price of the Company's common stock due to the potential resale into the market of significant amounts of common stock; (vii) the adverse effect a potential decrease in the trading price of the Company's common stock would have upon the Company's ability to acquire businesses through the issuance of its securities; (viii) the Company's ability to obtain financing on satisfactory terms; (ix) the reliance of the Company upon the continued service of its executive officers; (x) the Company's ability to remain competitive in the markets that it serves; (xi) the Company's ability to maintain its unemployment insurance premiums and workers compensation premiums; (xii) the risk of claims being made against the Company associated with providing temporary staffing services; (xiii) the Company's ability to manage significant amounts of information and periodically expand and upgrade its information processing capabilities; (xiv) the Company's ability to remain in compliance with federal and state wage and hour laws and regulations; (xv) uncertainties in predictions as to the future need for the Company’s services; (xvi) uncertainties relating to the allocation of costs and expenses to each of the Company’s operating segments; (xvii) the costs of conducting and the outcome of litigation involving the Company, and the applicability of insurance coverage with respect to any such litigation; (xviii) obligations relating to indemnities and similar agreements entered into in connection with the Company’s business activities; and (xix) other economic, competitive and governmental factors affecting the Company's operations, markets, products and services. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly release the results of any revision of these forward-looking statements to reflect these trends or circumstances after the date they are made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
ITEM 2.
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
|
Overview
RCM participates in a market that is cyclical in nature and sensitive to economic changes. As a result, the impact of economic changes on revenues and operations can be substantial, resulting in significant volatility in the Company’s financial performance.
The Company experienced a significant decrease in revenues during the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011 as compared to the comparable prior year period. The Company believes that the revenue decrease was primarily attributable to subpar performance in sales efforts (which the Company has taken steps to remediate) in the Company’s Information Technology segment and declines, resulting from general economic conditions, in the spending of its major Engineering segment clients, as further discussed in the Segment Discussion below. While the Company believes general economic conditions and overall market conditions for its Information Technology and Specialty Health Care segments have improved slightly from their recessionary lows, the Company is cautious regarding expectations for the remainder of 2011 as the Company believes that any general economic or market recovery may be slow and/or tenuous.
The Company believes it has developed and assembled an attractive portfolio of capabilities, established a proven record of performance and credibility and built an efficient pricing structure. The Company is committed to optimizing its business model as a single-source premier provider of business and technology solutions with a strong vertical focus offering an integrated suite of services through a global delivery platform.
The Company believes that most companies recognize the importance of advanced technologies and business processes to compete in today’s business climate. However, the process of designing, developing and implementing business and technology solutions is becoming increasingly complex. The Company believes that many businesses today are focused on return on investment analysis in prioritizing their initiatives. This has had an adverse impact on spending by current and prospective clients for many emerging new solutions.
Nonetheless, the Company continues to believe that businesses must implement more advanced information technology and engineering solutions to upgrade their systems, applications and processes so that they can maximize their productivity and optimize their performance in order to maintain a competitive advantage. Although working under budgetary, personnel and expertise constraints, companies are driven to support increasingly complex systems, applications and processes of significant strategic value. This has given rise to a demand for outsourcing. The Company believes that its current and prospective clients are continuing to evaluate the potential for outsourcing business critical systems, applications and processes.
The Company provides project management and consulting services, which are billed based on either agreed-upon fixed fees or hourly rates, or a combination of both. The billing rates and profit margins for project management and solutions services are generally higher than those for professional consulting services. The Company generally endeavors to expand its sales of higher margin solutions and project management services. The Company also realizes revenues from client engagements that range from the placement of contract and temporary technical consultants to project assignments that entail the delivery of end-to-end solutions. These services are primarily provided to the client at hourly rates that are established for each of the Company's consultants based upon their skill level, experience and the type of work performed.
ITEM 2.
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
|
Overview (Continued)
The majority of the Company's services are provided under purchase orders. Contracts are utilized on certain of the more complex assignments where the engagements are for longer terms or where precise documentation on the nature and scope of the assignment is necessary. Although contracts normally relate to longer-term and more complex engagements, they do not obligate the customer to purchase a minimum level of services and are generally terminable by the customer on 60 to 90 days’ notice. The Company, from time to time, enters into contracts requiring the completion of specific deliverables. Typically these contracts are for less than one year. The Company recognizes revenue on these deliverables at the time the client accepts and approves the deliverables.
Costs of services consist primarily of salaries and compensation-related expenses for billable consultants, including payroll taxes, employee benefits and insurance. Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits of personnel responsible for business development, recruiting, operating activities, and training, and include corporate overhead expenses. Corporate overhead expenses relate to salaries and benefits of personnel responsible for corporate activities, including the Company's corporate marketing, administrative and financial reporting responsibilities and acquisition program. The Company records these expenses when incurred.
Critical Accounting Policies
The Company’s consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with U. S. generally accepted accounting principles, which require management to make subjective decisions, assessments and estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. As the number of variables and assumptions affecting the judgment increases, such judgments become even more subjective. While management believes its assumptions are reasonable and appropriate, actual results may be materially different from estimated. Management has identified certain critical accounting policies, described below, that require significant judgment to be exercised by management.
Revenue Recognition
The Company derives its revenues from several sources. The Company’s Engineering Services and Information Technology Services segments perform consulting and project solutions services. All of the Company’s segments perform staff augmentation services and derive revenue from permanent placement fees. The majority of the Company's revenues are invoiced on a time and materials basis.
ITEM 2.
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
|
Revenue Recognition (Continued)
Project Services
The Company recognizes revenues in accordance with “Revenue Recognition” which clarifies application of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles to revenue transactions. Project services are generally provided on a cost-plus, fixed-fee or time-and-material basis. Typically, a customer will outsource a discrete project or activity and the Company assumes responsibility for the performance of such project or activity. The Company recognizes revenues and associated costs on a gross basis as services are provided to the customer and costs are incurred using its employees. The Company, from time to time, enters into contracts requiring the completion of specific deliverables. The Company may recognize revenues on these deliverables at the time the client accepts and approves the deliverables. In instances where project services are provided on a fixed-price basis and the contract will extend beyond a 12-month period, revenue is recorded in accordance with the terms of each contract. In some instances, revenue is billed and recorded at the time certain milestones are reached, as defined in the contract. In other instances, revenue is billed and recorded based upon contractual rates per hour (i.e., percentage of completion). In addition, some contracts contain “Performance Fees” (bonuses) for completing a contract under budget. Performance Fees, if any, are recorded when the Company is reasonably certain of collection. Some contracts also limit revenues and billings to maximum amounts. Provision for contract losses, if any, are made in the period such losses are determined. For contracts where there is a deliverable, the work is not complete on a specific deliverable and the revenue is not recognized, the costs are deferred. The associated costs are expensed when the related revenue is recognized.
Consulting and Staffing Services
Revenues derived from consulting and staffing services are recorded on a gross basis as services are performed and associated costs have been incurred using employees of the Company. In these circumstances, the Company assumes the risk of acceptability of its employees to its customers.
In certain cases, the Company may utilize other companies and their employees to fulfill customer requirements. In these cases, the Company receives an administrative fee for arranging for, billing for, and collecting the billings related to these companies. The customer is typically responsible for assessing the work of these companies who have responsibility for acceptability of their personnel to the customer. Under these circumstances, the Company’s reported revenues are net of associated costs (effectively recognizing the net administrative fee only).
Permanent Placement Services
The Company earns permanent placement fees from providing permanent placement services. Fees for placements are recognized at the time the candidate commences employment. The Company guarantees its permanent placements on a prorated basis for 90 days. In the event a candidate is not retained for the 90-day period, the Company will provide a suitable replacement candidate. In the event a replacement candidate cannot be located, the Company will provide a prorated refund to the client. An allowance for refunds, based upon the Company’s historical experience, is recorded in the financial statements. Revenues are recorded on a gross basis.
Net Revenue
The Company records revenue on a “net” basis on relevant engineering and construction management projects, which require subcontractors or pass-through costs. In those situations, the Company charges the client a management fee, which is reported as net revenue when earned. Under such contracts, the Company is not required to pay the subcontractor until payment is received from the client. Such pass-through amounts as of July 2, 2011 are not material.
ITEM 2.
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
|
Accounts Receivable
The Company’s accounts receivable are primarily due from trade customers. Credit is extended based on evaluation of customers’ financial condition and, generally, collateral is not required. Accounts receivable payment terms vary and are stated in the financial statements at amounts due from customers net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. Accounts receivable outstanding longer than the payment terms are considered past due. The Company determines its allowance by considering a number of factors, including the length of time trade accounts receivable are past due, the Company’s previous loss history, the customer’s current ability to pay its obligation to the Company, and the condition of the general economy and the industry as a whole. The Company writes off accounts receivable when they become uncollectible.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the premium paid over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired in business combinations. The Company is required to perform a goodwill impairment test on at least an annual basis. Application of the goodwill impairment test requires significant judgments including estimation of future cash flows, which is dependent on internal forecasts, estimation of the long-term rate of growth for the businesses, the useful life over which cash flows will occur and determination of weighted average cost of capital. Changes in these estimates and assumptions could materially affect the determination of fair value and/or conclusions on goodwill impairment for each reporting unit. The Company conducts its annual goodwill impairment test as of the last day of the Company’s fiscal November each year, or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist. The Company periodically analyzes whether any such indicators of impairment exist. A significant amount of judgment is involved in determining if an indicator of impairment has occurred. Such indicators may include a sustained, significant decline in share price and market capitalization, a decline in expected future cash flows, a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate, unanticipated competition and/or slower expected growth rates, among others. Due to the thin trading of the Company stock in the public marketplace and the impact of the control premium held by a relatively few shareholders, the Company does not consider the market capitalization of the Company the most appropriate measure of fair value of goodwill for our reporting units. The Company looks to earnings/revenue multiples of similar companies recently completing acquisitions and the ability of our reporting units to generate cash flows as better measures of the fair value of our reporting units, and under the November 2010 calculation the fair value exceeded the recorded goodwill by at least 25% for each of the reporting units. The Company compares the fair value of each of its reporting units to their respective carrying values, including related goodwill. There can be no assurance that future tests of goodwill impairment will not result in impairment charges.
Long-Lived and Intangible Assets
The Company evaluates long-lived assets and intangible assets with definite lives for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. When it is probable that undiscounted future cash flows will not be sufficient to recover an asset’s carrying amount, the asset is written down to its fair value. Assets to be disposed of by sale, if any, are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell.
Accounting for Stock Options
The Company uses stock options to attract, retain and reward employees for long-term service. The Company follows “Share Based Payment,” which requires that the compensation cost relating to stock-based payment transactions be recognized in financial statements. This compensation cost is measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. The Company measures stock-based compensation cost using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
ITEM 2.
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
|
Accounting for Income Taxes
In establishing the provision for income taxes and deferred income tax assets and liabilities, and valuation allowances against deferred tax assets, the Company makes judgments and interpretations based on enacted tax laws, published tax guidance and estimates of future earnings. As of July 2, 2011, the Company had short term deferred tax assets of $0.8 million and total long term net deferred income tax assets of $3.0 million. The short term deferred tax assets primarily represent timing differences for GAAP expense accruals not deductible for tax purposes. The long term deferred tax assets represent the tax effect of temporary differences for the GAAP versus tax amortization of acquisitions made in prior periods. Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the likelihood that future taxable income will be sufficient to realize these benefits over time, and the effectiveness of tax planning strategies in the relevant tax jurisdictions. In the event that actual results differ from these estimates and assessments, valuation allowances may be required.
The Company conducts its operations in multiple tax jurisdictions in the United States, Puerto Rico, Canada and Ireland. With limited exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to audits by state and local tax authorities for tax years prior to 2007. The Company’s federal income tax returns have been examined through 2007. As of July 2, 2011, the Company did not have any material uncertain tax positions.
The Company’s future effective tax rates could be adversely affected by changes in the valuation of its deferred tax assets or liabilities or changes in tax laws or interpretations thereof. In addition, the Company is subject to the examination of its income tax returns by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities. The Company regularly assesses the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of its provision for income taxes.
Accrued Bonuses
The Company pays bonuses to certain executive management, field management and corporate employees based on, or after giving consideration to, a variety of financial performance measures. Executive management, field management and certain corporate employees’ bonuses are accrued throughout the year for payment during the first quarter of the following year, based in part upon anticipated annual results compared to annual budgets. In addition, the Company pays discretionary bonuses to certain employees, which are not related to budget performance. Variances in actual results versus budgeted amounts can have a significant impact on the calculations and therefore on the estimates of the required accruals. Accordingly, the actual earned bonuses may be materially different from the estimates used to determine the quarterly accruals.
Forward-looking Information
The Company’s growth prospects are influenced by broad economic trends. The pace of customer capital spending programs, new product launches and similar activities have a direct impact on the need for information technology and engineering services. When the U.S., Canadian or global economies decline, the Company’s operating performance could be adversely impacted. The Company believes that its fiscal discipline, strategic focus on targeted vertical markets and diversification of service offerings provides some insulation from adverse trends. However, declines in the economy could result in the need for future cost reductions or changes in strategy.
Additionally, changes in government regulations could result in prohibition or restriction of certain types of employment services or the imposition of new or additional employee benefits, licensing or tax requirements with respect to the provision of employment services that may reduce the Company’s future earnings. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to increase the fees charged to its clients in a timely manner and in a sufficient amount to cover increased costs as a result of any of the foregoing.
ITEM 2.
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
|
Forward-looking Information (Continued)
The consulting and employment services market is highly competitive with limited barriers to entry. The Company competes in global, national, regional and local markets with numerous competitors in all of the Company's service lines. Price competition in the industries the Company serves is significant, and pricing pressures from competitors and customers are increasing. The Company expects that the level of competition will remain high in the future, which could limit the Company’s ability to maintain or increase its market share or profitability.
Thirteen Week Period Ended July 2, 2011 Compared to Thirteen Week Period Ended July 3, 2010
A summary of operating results for the thirteen week periods ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010 is as follows (in thousands):
|
July 2, 2011
|
|
July 3, 2010
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
% of Revenue
|
|
Amount
|
|
% of Revenue
|
|
Revenues
|
$36,514
|
|
100.0
|
|
$42,811
|
|
100.0
|
|
Cost of services
|
26,054
|
|
71.4
|
|
30,354
|
|
70.9
|
|
Gross profit
|
10,460
|
|
28.6
|
|
12,457
|
|
29.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
8,158
|
|
22.4
|
|
9,351
|
|
21.8
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
279
|
|
0.7
|
|
336
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
8,437
|
|
23.1
|
|
9,687
|
|
22.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
2,023
|
|
5.5
|
|
2,770
|
|
6.5
|
|
Other income, net
|
24
|
|
0.1
|
|
6
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before
income taxes
|
2,047
|
|
5.6
|
|
2,776
|
|
6.5
|
|
Income tax expense from continuing operations
|
805
|
|
2.2
|
|
1,126
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
1,242
|
|
3.4
|
|
1,650
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
68
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
$1,242
|
|
3.4
|
|
$1,718
|
|
4.0
|
|
The Company follows a 52/53 week fiscal reporting calendar ending on the Saturday closest to December 31. The year to date reporting periods ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010 consisted of thirteen weeks each.
Revenues. Revenues decreased 14.7%, or $6.3 million, for the thirteen week period ended July 2, 2011 as compared to the thirteen week period ended July 3, 2010 (the “comparable prior year period”). Revenues decreased $5.8 million in the Information Technology segment, decreased $0.5 million in the Engineering segment, and marginally decreased in the Specialty Health Care segment. The Company typically experiences seasonality in revenues during months that contain holidays and increased vacation time as billable personnel are not available to bill time to customers. See Segment Discussion for further information on revenue changes.
ITEM 2.
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
|
Thirteen Week Period Ended July 2, 2011 Compared to Thirteen Week Period Ended July 3, 2010 (Continued)
Cost of Services. Cost of services decreased 14.2%, or $4.3 million, for the thirteen week period ended July 2, 2011 as compared to the comparable prior year period. The decrease in cost of services was primarily due to a decrease in revenues. Cost of services as a percentage of revenues increased to 71.4% for the thirteen week period ended July 2, 2011 from 70.9% for the comparable prior year period. The increase in cost of services as a percentage of revenues was primarily due to an increase in non-billable time paid to the direct workforce in the Company’s Information Technology segment (i.e. decrease in utilization) and an increase in certain statutory payroll tax rates. Management anticipates the ratio of cost of sales to revenues for the remainder of fiscal 2011 to remain relatively comparable to that in the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011, adjusted for increased vacation and holidays in the third and fourth quarters.
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative (“SGA”) expenses decreased 12.8%, or $1.2 million, for the thirteen week period ended July 2, 2011 as compared to the comparable prior year period. As a percentage of revenues, SGA expenses were 22.4% for the thirteen week period ended July 2, 2011 as compared to 21.8% for the comparable prior year period. The decrease in SGA expenses was primarily due to a concerted effort by the Company to reduce SGA expenses. The primary components of the reduction include labor and related expenses, professional fees and bad debt. The increase to SGA expenses as a percentage of revenues was primarily due to the decrease in revenues. Assuming no material changes to gross profit, management expects SGA expenses for the remainder of fiscal 2011 to remain generally consistent with the SGA expenses for the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011.
Other Income, Net. Other income, net consists of interest expense, unused line fees and amortized loan costs on the Company’s loan agreement, net of interest income, gains and losses on foreign currency transactions.
Income Tax Expense From Continuing Operations. The Company experienced income tax expense from continuing operations of $0.8 million for the thirteen week period ended July 2, 2011 as compared to $1.1 million for the comparable prior year period. The effective income tax rate for income from continuing operations was 39.3% for the thirteen week period ended July 2, 2011 as compared to 40.6% for the comparable prior year period (before the effect of the first quarter 2010 goodwill and intangible asset deduction more fully described in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). The current period effective tax rate is comprised of an estimated effective tax rate of 41.5% in the United States offset by an effective tax rate of 24.4% in Canada (due to income tax abatements in Canada in 2011). Management anticipates that the effective tax rate for the remainder of fiscal 2011 will approximate the effective tax rate for the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011.
ITEM 2.
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
|
Thirteen Week Period Ended July 2, 2011 Compared to Thirteen Week Period Ended July 3, 2010 (Continued)
Discontinued Operations. See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report for a description of discontinued operations. The Company had no activity in its discontinued operations during the thirteen week period ended July 2, 2011. The Company does not anticipate material operating losses from discontinued operations for the balance of fiscal 2011.
Segment Discussion (See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements)
Information Technology
Information Technology revenues of $13.4 million in the thirteen week period ended July 2, 2011 decreased $5.8 million, or 30.1%, as compared to the comparable prior year period. The Company believes the decrease in revenue was primarily attributable to poor execution by its sales generation team, which the Company believes it has taken steps to remediate. In particular, the Information Technology segment experienced a $1.3 million decrease from its Michigan and Ohio offices and a $1.7 million decrease from its Life Sciences clients. The Life Sciences group experienced a decrease of $1.7 million from two pharmaceutical clients whose projects ended or were significantly curtailed at the end of the second quarter in 2010, while all other Life Science clients were essentially flat. The Information Technology segment operating income was $0.1 million for the thirteen week period ended July 2, 2011 as compared to $0.7 million for the comparable prior year period. The decrease in operating income was primarily attributable to a decrease in revenues.
Engineering
Engineering revenues of $15.8 million in the thirteen week period ended July 2, 2011 decreased $0.5 million, or 3.1%, as compared to the comparable prior year period. The decrease in revenues was primarily attributable to the timing of significant projects for the Engineering segments major clients. The Engineering segment operating income was $1.1 million for the thirteen week period ended July 2, 2011 as compared to $1.4 million for the comparable prior year period. The decrease in operating income was primarily due to lower revenues and a higher allocation of corporate SGA expense. Corporate SGA expense is allocated based on revenues and the Engineering revenues as a percentage of total revenues significantly increased in 2011.
Specialty Health Care
Specialty Health Care revenues of $7.2 million in the thirteen week period ended July 2, 2011 marginally decreased, as compared to the comparable prior year period. The Specialty Health Care segment operating income was $0.8 million for the thirteen week period ended July 2, 2011 as compared to $0.7 million for the comparable prior year period. The primary reason for the increase in operating income was a decrease in SGA expense offset by increases to cost of services as a percentage of revenues. The increase to cost of services as a percentage of revenues was primarily due to percentage increases to New York state payroll taxes and related items.
ITEM 2.
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
|
Twenty-Six Week Period Ended July 2, 2011 Compared to Twenty-Six Week Period Ended July 3, 2010
A summary of operating results for the twenty-six week periods ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010 is as follows (in thousands):
|
July 2, 2011
|
|
July 3, 2010
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
% of Revenue
|
|
Amount
|
|
% of Revenue
|
|
Revenues
|
$75,220
|
|
100.0
|
|
$88,140
|
|
100.0
|
|
Cost of services
|
53,709
|
|
71.4
|
|
63,338
|
|
71.9
|
|
Gross profit
|
21,511
|
|
28.6
|
|
24,802
|
|
28.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
16,842
|
|
22.4
|
|
19,264
|
|
21.8
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
588
|
|
0.8
|
|
680
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
17,430
|
|
23.2
|
|
19,944
|
|
22.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
4,081
|
|
5.4
|
|
4,858
|
|
5.5
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
3
|
|
-
|
|
(39
|
)
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before
income taxes
|
4,084
|
|
5.4
|
|
4,819
|
|
5.5
|
|
Income tax expense from continuing operations
|
1,667
|
|
2.2
|
|
742
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
2,417
|
|
3.2
|
|
4,077
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
(586)
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
$2,417
|
|
3.2
|
|
$3,491
|
|
4.0
|
|
The Company follows a 52/53 week fiscal reporting calendar ending on the Saturday closest to December 31. The year to date reporting periods ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010 consisted of twenty-six weeks each.
Revenues. Revenues decreased 14.7%, or $12.9 million, for the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011 as compared to the twenty-six week period ended July 3, 2010 (the “comparable prior year period”). Revenues decreased $10.3 million in the Information Technology segment, decreased $3.0 million in the Engineering segment, and increased $0.5 million in the Specialty Health Care segment. The Company typically experiences seasonality in revenues during months that contain holidays and increased vacation time as billable personnel are not available to bill time to customers. See Segment Discussion for further information on revenue changes.
ITEM 2.
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
|
Twenty-Six Week Period Ended July 2, 2011 Compared to Twenty-six Week Period Ended July 3, 2010 (Continued)
Cost of Services. Cost of services decreased 15.2%, or $9.6 million, for the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011 as compared to the comparable prior year period. The decrease in cost of services was primarily due to a decrease in revenues. Cost of services as a percentage of revenues decreased to 71.4% for the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011 from 71.9% for the comparable prior year period. The decrease in cost of services as a percentage of revenues was primarily due to favorable fixed priced contracts in our Engineering segment and the Company’s focus on providing higher margin services in general. Management anticipates the ratio of cost of sales to revenues for the remainder of fiscal 2011 to remain relatively comparable to that in the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011, adjusted for increased vacation and holidays in the third and fourth quarters.
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative (“SGA”) expenses decreased 12.6%, or $2.4 million, for the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011 as compared to the comparable prior year period. As a percentage of revenues, SGA expenses were 22.4% for the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011 as compared to 21.8% for the comparable prior year period. The decrease in SGA expenses was primarily due to a concerted effort by the Company to reduce SGA expenses. The primary components of the reduction include labor and related expenses, professional fees and bad debt. The increase to SGA expenses as a percentage of revenues was primarily due to the decrease in revenues. Assuming no material changes to gross profit, management expects SGA expenses for the remainder of fiscal 2011 to remain generally consistent with the SGA expenses for the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011.
Other Income, Net. Other income, net consists of interest expense, unused line fees and amortized loan costs on the Company’s loan agreement, net of interest income, gains and losses on foreign currency transactions.
Income Tax Expense From Continuing Operations. The Company experienced income tax expense from continuing operations of $1.7 million for the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011 as compared to $0.7 million for the comparable prior year period. The effective income tax rate for income from continuing operations was 40.8% for the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011 as compared to 38.2% for the comparable prior year period (before the effect of the first quarter 2010 goodwill and intangible asset deduction more fully described in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). The current period effective tax rate is comprised of an estimated effective tax rate of 43.4% in the United States offset by an effective tax rate of 27.2% in Canada (due to income tax abatements in Canada in 2011). The Company also experienced an approximate loss of $0.1 million in Ireland whereby the net effect of a full valuation allowance yielded no tax benefit and increased the Company’s consolidated effective tax rate. Management anticipates that the effective tax rate for the remainder of fiscal 2011 will approximate the effective tax rate for the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011.
ITEM 2.
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
|
Twenty-Six Week Period Ended July 2, 2011 Compared to Twenty-six Week Period Ended July 3, 2010 (Continued)
Discontinued Operations. See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report for a description of discontinued operations. The Company had no activity in its discontinued operations during the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011 as compared to a loss, net of tax benefit of $0.6 million for the comparable prior year period. The Company does not anticipate material operating losses from discontinued operations for the balance of fiscal 2011.
Segment Discussion (See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements)
Information Technology
Information Technology revenues of $28.7 million in the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011 decreased $10.3 million, or 26.5%, as compared to the comparable prior year period. The Company believes the decrease in revenue was primarily attributable to poor execution by its sales generation team, which the Company believes it has taken steps to remediate. In particular, the Information Technology segment experienced a $2.5 million decrease from its Michigan and Ohio offices and a $3.7 million decrease from its Life Sciences clients. The Life Sciences group experienced a decrease of $4.0 million from two pharmaceutical clients whose projects ended or were significantly curtailed at the end of the second quarter in 2010, offset by a $0.3 million increase from all other Life Science clients. The Information Technology segment operating income was $0.3 million for the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011 as compared to $0.7 million for the comparable prior year period. The decrease in operating income was primarily due to a decrease in revenues.
Engineering
Engineering revenues of $32.0 million in the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011 decreased $3.0 million, or 8.7%, as compared to the comparable prior year period. The decrease in revenues was primarily attributable to the timing of significant projects for the Engineering segments major clients. The Engineering segment operating income was $2.5 million for the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011 as compared to $2.9 million for the comparable prior year period. The decrease in operating income was primarily due to lower revenues and a higher allocation of corporate SGA expense. Corporate SGA expense is allocated based on revenues and the Engineering segment revenues as a percentage of total revenues significantly increased in 2011. Revenues decreased on a comparative basis due to periodic or cyclical changes in demand from several large clients. In particular, the Company believes the demand from several major Engineering clients in the twenty-six weeks ended July 3, 2010 was unusually high.
Specialty Health Care
Specialty Health Care revenues of $14.5 million in the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011 increased $0.5 million, or 3.3%, as compared to the comparable prior year period. The Specialty Health Care segment operating income was $1.2 million for both the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011 and the comparable prior year period.
ITEM 2.
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table summarizes the major captions from the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (in thousands):
|
Twenty-Six Week Periods Ended
|
|
|
July 2,
2011
|
|
July 3,
2010
|
|
Cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
($306
|
)
|
$8,159
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
($170
|
)
|
$12
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
($748
|
)
|
($41
|
)
|
Operating Activities
Operating activities used $0.3 million of cash for the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011 as compared to providing $8.2 million in the comparable prior year period. The major components of the cash used/provided by operating activities in the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011 and the comparable prior year period are as follows: net income, accounts receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses and accrued payroll and related costs.
Net income for the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011 was $2.4 million as compared to $3.5 million for the comparable prior year period. An increase in accounts receivables in the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011 used $1.8 million as compared to a decrease in accounts receivables during the twenty-six week period ended July 3, 2010 which provided $1.1 million. The Company primarily attributes the increase in accounts receivables for the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011 to an increase in work-in-progress billings in its Engineering segment and overall increases in its sales days outstanding due to temporary timing differences. The Company anticipates improved sales days outstanding for the balance of its fiscal 2011.
A decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011 used $0.9 million as compared to providing $0.7 million in the comparable prior year period. The Company attributes these changes to general timing of payments to vendors in the normal course of business. A decrease to accrued payroll and related costs in the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011 used $0.4 million as compared to providing $1.7 million in the comparable prior year period. The decrease in accrued payroll and related costs during the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011 primarily relates to reduced payroll.
ITEM 2.
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources (Continued)
Investing Activities
Investing activities used cash of $0.2 million for the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011 as compared to marginally positive cash flow from investing activities for the comparable prior year period. The increase in cash used from investing activities was primarily attributable to increases to deposits for leased office space and slightly increased expenditures for property and equipment. The Company anticipates upgrading its ERP system sometime in 2011 and expects to see a significant rise in expenditures for property and equipment as a result. Additionally, the Company’s Engineering segment may purchase several pieces of equipment totaling $0.5 million for one of its operating divisions.
Financing Activities
Financing activities consisted of using $0.7 million for the twenty-six week period ended July 2, 2011 as compared to marginally negative cash flow for the comparable prior year period. The primary use of cash was for the Company’s share repurchase program.
The Company and its subsidiaries are party to a loan agreement with Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, amended and restated effective February 20, 2009, which provides for a $15 million revolving credit facility and includes a sub-limit of $5.0 million for letters of credit (the “Revolving Credit Facility”). The Revolving Credit Facility was amended on July 21, 2011 to extend the maturity date to October 31, 2011. Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at one of two alternative rates, as selected by the Company at each incremental borrowing. These alternatives are: (i) LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate), plus applicable margin, or (ii) the agent bank's prime rate. The Company also pays unused line fees based on the amount of the Revolving Credit Facility that is not drawn. Unused line fees are recorded as interest expense.
All borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility are collateralized by all of the assets of the Company and its subsidiaries and a pledge of the stock of its subsidiaries. The Revolving Credit Facility also contains various financial and non-financial covenants, such as restrictions on the Company’s ability to pay dividends. The Revolving Credit Facility expires October 31, 2011. The Company intends to seek to extend or replace the Revolving Credit Facility prior to such time if it is determined that doing so would be in alignment with the Company’s financing needs.
There were no borrowings during the twenty-six week periods ended July 2, 2011 and July 3, 2010. At July 2, 2011 and January 1, 2011, there were letters of credit outstanding for $0.9 million. At July 2, 2011, the Company had availability for additional borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility of $14.1 million.
As of July 2, 2011, $1.9 million of the $23.5 million (on the Consolidated Balance Sheet) of cash and cash equivalents was held by foreign subsidiaries.
Commitments
The Company anticipates that its primary uses of capital in future periods will be for working capital purposes. Funding for any long-term and short-term capital requirements as well as future acquisitions will be derived from one or more of the Revolving Credit Facility (or a replacement thereof), funds generated through operations or future financing transactions. The Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of its business, which may or may not be covered by insurance. Were an unfavorable final outcome to occur, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on our financial position, liquidity, and the results of operations for the period in which the effect becomes reasonably estimable.
The Company's business strategy is to achieve growth both internally through operations and externally through strategic acquisitions. The Company from time to time engages in discussions with potential acquisition candidates. As the size of the Company and its financial resources increase however, acquisition opportunities requiring significant commitments of capital may arise. In order to pursue such opportunities, the Company may be required to incur debt or issue potentially dilutive securities in the future. No assurance can be given as to the Company’s future acquisition and expansion opportunities or how such opportunities will be financed.
ITEM 2.
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources (Continued)
Commitments - (Continued)
The Company does not currently have material commitments for capital expenditures. However, the Company anticipates that it will begin to upgrade its current ERP system sometime in 2011. Additionally, the Company believes that its Engineering segment will purchase several pieces of equipment totaling $0.5 million for one of its operating divisions. The Company's current commitments consist primarily of lease obligations for office space. The Company believes that its capital resources are sufficient to meet its present obligations and those to be incurred in the normal course of business for at least the next 12 months.
The Company leases office facilities and various equipment under non-cancelable leases expiring at various dates through September 2015. Certain leases are subject to escalation clauses based upon changes in various factors. The minimum future annual operating lease commitments for leases with non-cancelable terms, exclusive of unknown operating escalation charges, are as follows (in thousands):
Fiscal Years
|
Amount
|
2011 (after July 2, 2011)
|
$1,899
|
2012
|
2,612
|
2013
|
1,098
|
2014
|
267
|
2015
|
113
|
Total
|
$5,989
|
The Company has one active acquisition agreement whereby future contingent consideration may be earned and paid (PSG in 2009). In connection with these acquisitions, the Company is obligated to pay future contingent consideration to the sellers upon the acquired business achieving certain earnings targets over periods ranging from two to four years following the acquisition. In general, the future contingent consideration amounts fall into two categories: (a) Deferred Consideration - fixed amounts due if the acquisition achieves a base level of earnings which has been determined at the time of acquisition and (b) Earnouts – amounts payable that are not fixed and are based on the growth in excess of the base level earnings.
The Company’s outstanding Deferred Consideration obligations potentially due after July 2, 2011, which relate to the PSG acquisition, could result in the following maximum Deferred Consideration payments:
Year Ending
|
|
Amount
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
$144
|
December 29, 2012
|
|
164
|
December 28, 2013
|
|
184
|
Maximum deferred consideration
|
|
$492
|
The Company cannot predict future Deferred Consideration payments with any certainty. Earnouts, if any, cannot be estimated with any certainty and as such are not included above. Any Earnouts paid, if any, are not likely to be material.
ITEM 3.
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
The Company’s exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the Company’s investment portfolio and debt instruments, which primarily consist of its Revolving Credit Facility. The Company does not have any derivative financial instruments in its portfolio. The Company places its investments in instruments that meet high credit quality standards. The Company is adverse to principal loss and ensures the safety and preservation of its invested funds by limiting default risk, market risk and reinvestment risk. As of July 2, 2011, the Company’s investments consisted of cash and money market funds. The Company does not use interest rate derivative instruments to manage its exposure to interest rate changes. Presently the impact of a 10% (approximately 90 basis points) increase in interest rates on its variable debt (using an incremental borrowing rate) would have a relatively nominal impact on the Company’s results of operations. The Company does not expect any material loss with respect to its investment portfolio.
ITEM 4.
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|
The Company’s management, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that those disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
A controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.
There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter and that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
|
ITEM 1.
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
|
See discussion of Contingencies in Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 of this report.
There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in the “Risk Factors” section (Item 1A) of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2011, as updated in the Company’s Quarterly Report for the fiscal quarter ended July 2, 2011.
ITEM 2.
|
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
|
The following table provides information relating to the Company’s repurchases of common stock during the thirteen week period ended July 2, 2011 under the share repurchase program authorized by our Board of Directors in February 2010 and extended in February 2011.
Period
|
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
|
|
Average
Price
Paid
Per Share
|
|
Total Number
of Shares Purchased
as Part of Publicly
Announced
Program
|
|
Approximate Dollar
Value of Shares
that May Yet Be
Purchased Under
the Program
|
April 3 – May 2
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
$6,638,680
|
May 3 – June 2
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
$6,638,680
|
June 3 – July 2
|
48,807
|
|
$5.21
|
|
48,807
|
|
$6,384,476
|
Total
|
48,807
|
|
$5.21
|
|
48,807
|
|
$6,384,476
|
ITEM 3.
|
DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
|
None.
ITEM 4.
|
[REMOVED AND RESERVED]
|
ITEM 5.
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
None.
31.1
|
Certification of Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|
|
|
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|
|
|
32.1
|
Certification of Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. (This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Further, this exhibit shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.)
|
|
|
32.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. (This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Further, this exhibit shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.)
|
|
|
101.INS*
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
|
101.SCH*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
|
|
101.CAL*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
|
101.LAB*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
|
|
101.PRE*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Documents
|
|
|
101.DEF*
|
XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document
|
|
|
*XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.
|
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
SIGNATURES
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
RCM Technologies, Inc.
|
Date: August 9, 2011
|
|
By: /s/ Leon Kopyt
|
|
|
|
Leon Kopyt
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and
Duly Authorized Officer of the Registrant)
|
Date: August 9, 2011
|
|
By: /s/ Kevin Miller
|
|
|
|
Kevin Miller
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Duly Authorized Officer of the Registrant)
|
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY
RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
CERTIFICATION
I, Leon Kopyt, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RCM Technologies, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 9, 2011
|
|
/s/ Leon Kopyt
Leon Kopyt
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY
RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
CERTIFICATION
I, Kevin Miller, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RCM Technologies, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 9, 2011
|
|
/s/ Kevin Miller
Kevin Miller
Chief Financial Officer
|
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY
RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
I, Leon Kopyt, President and Chief Executive Officer of RCM Technologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to my knowledge:
(1) The Company’s periodic report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 2, 2011 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
* * *
/s/ Leon Kopyt
Leon Kopyt
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: August 9, 2011
RCM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY
RULE 13a-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
I, Kevin Miller, Chief Financial Officer of RCM Technologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify that, to my knowledge:
(1) The Company’s periodic report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 2, 2011 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
* * *
/s/ Kevin Miller
Kevin Miller
Chief Financial Officer
Date: August 9, 2011