SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event Reported) September 10, 2002
WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Washington | 1-14667 | 91-1653725 | ||
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (Commission File No.) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
1201 Third Avenue Seattle, Washington 98101
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (206) 461-2000
Item 9. Regulation FD Disclosure.
The following slides may be used by Washington Mutual, Inc. in various presentations to investors:
Kerry Killinger
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
Forward-Looking Statements
"This presentation contains forward-looking statements, which are not historical facts and pertain to future operating results. These forward-looking statements are within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and other statements contained in this document that are not historical facts. When used in this presentation, the words "expects," "anticipates," "intends," "plans," "believes," "seeks," "estimates," or words of similar meaning, or future or conditional verbs, such as "will," "would," "should," "could," or "may" are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, these forward-looking statements are subject to assumptions with respect to future business strategies and decisions that are subject to change. Actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in these forward-looking statements for the reasons, among others, discussed under the heading "BusinessFactors That May Affect Future Results" in Washington Mutual's 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K and under the heading, "Cautionary Statements," in Washington Mutual's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, which include: changes in general business and economic conditions may significantly affect our earnings; the risk that our inability to effectively manage the volatility of our mortgage banking business could adversely affect our earnings; the risk that the impact of rising interest rates may result in an increase in our cost of interest-bearing liabilities, which could outpace the increase in the yield on interest-earning assets and lead to a reduction in the net interest margin; the risk that our inability to effectively integrate the operations and personnel of companies we have acquired could adversely affect our earnings and financial condition; the concentration of operations in California could adversely affect our operating results if the California economy or real estate market declines; competition from other financial services companies in our markets could adversely affect our ability to achieve our financial goals; changes in the regulation of financial services companies could adversely affect our business.
Business Segment Financial Information
Business segment financial information is prepared for management information purposes and uses methodologies which do not conform to generally accepted accounting principles. These methodologies include internal allocations of the cost of funds, hedge gains or losses, loan loss provisions and certain overhead items.
Unique Business Model
Net Income by Business Segment
Five-Year Plan: 2000-2004
Achieve Financial Targets
|
YTD 6/30/02 |
Targets 2000-2004 |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Return on average common equity | 20.42 | % | >20.00 | % | |
EPS growth | 18.45 | (a) | >13.00 | ||
Efficiency ratio | 47.21 | (b) | <45.00 | ||
NPA/Total assets | 0.96 | (c) | <1.00 | ||
Common equity/total assets | 7.51 | (c)(d) | >5.00 | ||
Estimated total risk-based capital | 12.40 | (c)(d)(e) | >11.00 |
Creating Shareholder Value Dime
EPS Growth(a)
Creating a Powerful National Franchise
Banking and Financial Services
Home Loans and Insurance Services
Specialty Finance Market Position
Characteristics of High Performing Companies
WaMuA High Performing Company
Strong Intangibles
Acquisition Update
Closed Transactions |
Deposit & Loan Servicing Conversion Status |
||
---|---|---|---|
PNC(a) | X | ||
Bank United Corp. | X | ||
Fleet Mortgage Corp. | X | ||
Dime Savings Bank | |||
Deposit Systems | X | ||
Loan Servicing Systems | Q4 2002 | ||
NAMC(b) | Q4 2002 | ||
HomeSide Acquisition(c) | N/A |
Creating Shareholder Value
Cumulative Value of Investments(a)
Summary
BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP
Second Quarter 2002
Kim Kahmer
Group Chief Financial Officer
Forward-Looking Statements
"This presentation contains forward-looking statements, which are not historical facts and pertain to future operating results. These forward-looking statements are within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and other statements contained in this document that are not historical facts. When used in this presentation, the words "expects," "anticipates," "intends," "plans," "believes," "seeks," "estimates," or words of similar meaning, or future or conditional verbs, such as "will," "would," "should," "could," or "may" are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, these forward-looking statements are subject to assumptions with respect to future business strategies and decisions that are subject to change. Actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in these forward-looking statements for the reasons, among others, discussed under the heading "BusinessFactors That May Affect Future Results" in Washington Mutual's 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K and under the heading, "Cautionary Statements," in Washington Mutual's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, which include: changes in general business and economic conditions may significantly affect our earnings; the risk that our inability to effectively manage the volatility of our mortgage banking business could adversely affect our earnings; the risk that the impact of rising interest rates may result in an increase in our cost of interest-bearing liabilities, which could outpace the increase in the yield on interest-earning assets and lead to a reduction in the net interest margin; the risk that our inability to effectively integrate the operations and personnel of companies we have acquired could adversely affect our earnings and financial condition; the concentration of operations in California could adversely affect our operating results if the California economy or real estate market declines; competition from other financial services companies in our markets could adversely affect our ability to achieve our financial goals; changes in the regulation of financial services companies could adversely affect our business.
Business Segment Financial Information
Business segment financial information is prepared for management information purposes and uses methodologies which do not conform to generally accepted accounting principles. These methodologies include internal allocations of the cost of funds, hedge gains or losses, loan loss provisions and certain overhead items.
Highlights
Mission
To be the bank of choice nationwide for middle-market consumers and small-and mid-sized businesses by delivering great value and friendly service
Profile
Distribution Network
Market |
Retail Branches |
ATMs |
Business Banking Centers |
Financial Consultants |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
California | 546 | 1,007 | 14 | 359 | ||||
WA/OR | 288 | 387 | 20 | 90 | ||||
Texas | 204 | 210 | 5 | 51 | ||||
Florida | 141 | 265 | 1 | 63 | ||||
NY/NJ | 127 | 268 | 3 | 74 | ||||
UT/ID | 51 | 58 | 11 | 6 | ||||
Las Vegas | 21 | 27 | | 3 | ||||
Phoenix | 24 | 26 | 1 | 3 | ||||
Atlanta | 33 | 39 | | 4 | ||||
Total | 1,435 | * | 2,287 | 55 | 653 |
Segment Net Interest Income
Segment Noninterest Income
Segment Noninterest Expense
Segment Net Income
Same-Store Sales(a)
|
Per Location |
|
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
% change |
||||||||
|
YTD 6/30/01 |
YTD 6/30/02 |
|||||||
# of Checking Accts(b) | 4,981 | 5,800 | 16 | % | |||||
Consumer Lending | $ | 2,972,037 | $ | 5,029,521 | 69 | % | |||
Mortgage Lending | $ | 2,676,458 | $ | 2,864,508 | 7 | % | |||
Fee Income | $ | 485,500 | $ | 568,662 | 17 | % | |||
FTE(c) | 9.9 | 10.4 | 3 | % |
Five-Year Targets: 2000-2004
Household Market Share
|
12/31/99 |
6/30/02 |
Change |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WA/OR | 28.3 | % | 29.8 | % | 1.4 | % | |
California | 23.8 | 27.8 | 4.0 | ||||
UT/ID | 10.8 | 12.2 | 1.4 | ||||
Nevada | NA | 8.1 | 8.1 | ||||
Arizona | NA | 2.1 | 2.1 | ||||
Western States Average | 24.0 | % | 25.0 | % | |||
Florida |
22.5 |
% |
26.3 |
% |
3.8 |
% |
|
Texas | 3.2 | 10.3 | (a) | 7.2 | |||
NY/NJ | NA | 8.5 | (b) | 8.5 | |||
Georgia | NA | 2.0 | 2.0 | ||||
Other States Average | 12.8 | % | 12.0 | % | |||
Overall Average | 21.0 | % | 19.0 | % |
Household Growth
Multi-Pronged Growth Strategy
Desirable National Brand
#1 Recognized Banking Brand*
Dynamic, Human, Driven, Caring, Fair
Desirable National Brand
Ad Awareness
Top Service Provider
Cross-sell Ratio*
Multi-Pronged Growth Strategy
Mass Market Appeal
Net Retail Checking Account Growth
Product Relationship Growth Attributed to Free Checking(a)(b)
Financial Center Incentive Compensation
Financial Center Incentive Compensation
+ | Production credits | |
+ | Deposit/assets under management credits | |
+ | Fee income | |
+ | Other income | |
- | Operating expenses | |
= | Net income | |
÷ | FTE | |
= | Net income per FTE |
Financial Center Incentive Compensation(a)
|
Financial Center(b) Managers |
Assistant Financial Center(b) Managers |
Sales Positions |
Service Positions |
Total |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Base | 43 | % | 64 | % | 42 | % | 90 | % | 60 | % | |
Incentive | 57 | 36 | 58 | 10 | 40 |
Multi-Pronged Growth Strategy
De Novo Expansion
Occasio
setting a new standard for retail banking
Occasio in De Novo Market
Original Forecast Model vs. Actual Results
12th Month of Operation |
Original Model(a) |
Las Vegas Actual(b) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Checking Accts. | 1,928 | 1,224 | |||||
Loans ($000s) | $ | 3,035 | $ | 1,383 | |||
Deposits ($000s) | $ | 11,020 | $ | 9,562 | |||
Transaction Deposit Mix | 85 | % | 86 | % | |||
Fee Income ($000s) | $ | 40 | $ | 58 | |||
Operating Expenses ($000s) | $ | 74 | $ | 79 |
Occasio Sites in De Novo Markets
Location |
Current Sites |
Proposed Sites for 2002 |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Las Vegas, NV | 21 | 1 | ||
Phoenix, AZ | 24 | 7 | ||
Atlanta, GA | 33 | 30 | ||
Denver, CO | 0 | 20 | ||
Total | 78 | 58 |
Occasio Sites in Existing Markets
Location |
Occasio |
Occasio Retrofits |
Total |
Proposed Sites for 2002 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
California | 26 | 18 | 44 | 31 | ||||
Texas | 22 | 20 | 42 | 26 | ||||
Florida | 14 | 13 | 27 | 23 | ||||
Washington | 15 | 4 | 19 | 8 | ||||
Oregon | 7 | 4 | 11 | 6 | ||||
Idaho | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | ||||
Utah | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1 | ||||
NY/NJ | 4 | 0 | 4 | 36 | ||||
Total | 94 | 59 | 153 | 134 |
Results of Same-Store Sales Comparison
Occasio Retrofits vs. Traditional are favorable
Denver (Opening late 2002)
Dramatic growth in population and households in the last decade
Multi-Pronged Growth Strategy
Significant Recent Acquisitions
Banking and Financial Services seeks to maximize value for all acquired franchises
|
Year Acquired |
Branches Acquired |
Households* Acquired |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
American Savings (ASB) | 1996 | 159 | 590,000 | |||
Great Western (GW) | 1997 | 411 | 2,210,000 | |||
Home Savings (HSA) | 1998 | 383 | 1,260,000 | |||
Bank United (BNKU) | 2001 | 157 | 280,000 | |||
Dime Savings (DIME) | 2002 | 123 | 609,000 |
ASB and GW Same-Store Sales(a)
|
1998 |
1999 |
% change |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# of Checking Accts(b) | 4,109 | 4,721 | 15 | % | |||||
Consumer Lending Volume | $ | 1,258,947 | $ | 1,674,358 | 33 | ||||
Mortgage Lending Volume | $ | 411,426 | $ | 1,792,338 | 336 | ||||
Fee Income | $ | 585,018 | $ | 847,529 | 45 | ||||
FTE(c) | 10.0 | 10.4 | 3 |
HSA Same-Store Sales(a)
|
1999 |
2000 |
% change |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# of Checking Accts(b) | 2,728 | 3,273 | 20 | % | |||||
Consumer Lending Volume | $ | 2,607,191 | $ | 4,096,047 | 126 | ||||
Mortgage Lending Volume | $ | 798,238 | $ | 1,134,766 | 42 | ||||
Fee Income | $ | 287,472 | $ | 454,480 | 58 | ||||
FTE(c) | 8.7 | 8.5 | (2 | ) |
Bank United Same-Store Sales(a)
|
Q2'01 |
Q2'02 |
% change |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# of Checking Accts(b) | 1,680 | 2,161 | 29 | % | |||||
Consumer Lending Volume | $ | 287,807 | $ | 889,018 | 209 | ||||
Mortgage Lending Volume | $ | 25,875 | $ | 74,030 | 186 | ||||
Fee Income | $ | 60,744 | $ | 115,996 | 91 | ||||
FTE(c) | 5.9 | 5.7 | (4 | ) |
Dime Integration on Track
Five-Year Targets: 2000-2004
Depositor & Other Retail Banking Fees and Securities Fees & Commissions*
Segment Expense Coverage Ratio
Fee Income Strategy
Listen to consumers
Fee Income Future Plans
Five-Year Targets: 2000-2004
Consumer Loan Portfolio*
Consumer Loan Opportunities
Consumer Loan Accomplishments and Future Plans
Five-Year Targets: 2000-2004
Remix Deposit Base
Impact of Remix on Cost of Deposits
Increased proportion of transaction balances provides a 25 bps funding cost advantage at 6/30/02
|
6/30/02 Rates |
12/31/99 Mix/WAIR |
6/30/02 Mix/WAIR |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Transaction Deposits | 1.87 | % | 54 | % | 71 | % | |
Time Deposits | 3.32 | % | 46 | % | 29 | % | |
Wtd. Avg. Int. Rate | 2.54 | %* | 2.29 | %* |
Five-Year Targets: 2000-2004
Deposits
Platinum Account Results
Consumer Deposit Accomplishments and Future Plans
WM Group of Funds
Summary
HOME LOANS AND INSURANCE SERVICES GROUP
Second Quarter 2002
Craig Davis
Group President
Forward-Looking Statements
"This presentation contains forward-looking statements, which are not historical facts and pertain to future operating results. These forward-looking statements are within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and other statements contained in this document that are not historical facts. When used in this presentation, the words "expects," "anticipates," "intends," "plans," "believes," "seeks," "estimates," or words of similar meaning, or future or conditional verbs, such as "will," "would," "should," "could," or "may" are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, these forward-looking statements are subject to assumptions with respect to future business strategies and decisions that are subject to change. Actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in these forward-looking statements for the reasons, among others, discussed under the heading "BusinessFactors That May Affect Future Results" in Washington Mutual's 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K and under the heading, "Cautionary Statements," in Washington Mutual's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, which include: changes in general business and economic conditions may significantly affect our earnings; the risk that our inability to effectively manage the volatility of our mortgage banking business could adversely affect our earnings; the risk that the impact of rising interest rates may result in an increase in our cost of interest-bearing liabilities, which could outpace the increase in the yield on interest-earning assets and lead to a reduction in the net interest margin; the risk that our inability to effectively integrate the operations and personnel of companies we have acquired could adversely affect our earnings and financial condition; the concentration of operations in California could adversely affect our operating results if the California economy or real estate market declines; competition from other financial services companies in our markets could adversely affect our ability to achieve our financial goals; changes in the regulation of financial services companies could adversely affect our business.
Business Segment Financial Information
Business segment financial information is prepared for management information purposes and uses methodologies which do not conform to generally accepted accounting principles. These methodologies include internal allocations of the cost of funds, hedge gains or losses, loan loss provisions and certain overhead items.
At a Glance
Our lines of business:
Our Goal
As America's Lending Leader...
Mortgage Industry Overview
Industry Trends
Drivers of Growth: Projected Single-Family Mortgage Debt Outstanding
|
Annual Growth Rate |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Actual(a) |
Forecast Range(b) |
|||||
|
1980s |
1990s |
2000s |
||||
Households | 1.5 | % | 1.4 | % | 1.3 - 1.4 | % | |
Homeownership Rate |
(0.2 |
) |
0.5 |
0.5 - 0.6 |
|||
Average Home Price Gains |
7.3 |
3.6 |
5.0 - 6.5 |
||||
SF Residential Investment | 8.6 | % | 5.5 | % | 6.8% - 8.5 | % | |
Debt-to-Value Ratio |
2.0 |
1.6 |
1.3 - 1.7 |
||||
SF Mortgage Debt Outstanding | 10.6 | % | 7.0 | % | 8.1% - 10.2 | % | |
Servicing Market Trends
Source: Inside Mortgage Finance
Origination Market Trends
Source: Mortgage Bankers Association, Mortgage Finance Forecast, August 2002
Accelerating Consolidation
Source: Inside Mortgage Finance
Risk Management
Competitive Strengths
Unique Business Model
A mortgage product for all interest rate cycles
Maximize Economies of Scale
Customer Relationship Management
Brand Awareness
Our Business Strategy
Strategic Objectives
Building America's Lending Leader
Servicing Market Share Growth
Source: Inside Mortgage Finance
Servicing Portfolio*
Servicing Profile(a)
Building America's Lending Leader
Origination Market Share Growth
Loan Volume by Product Mix*
Nationwide Presence
As of 6/30/02
Loan Volume by Channel(a)
Loan Volume by Geographic Mix*
Optis Technology Platform
WaMu's end-to-end automated mortgage origination platform
|
Purpose |
Status |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Release 0.1 | Supports Speed of Decision | Fully deployed | ||
Optis Value |
Web-based appraisal management and delivery system |
Fully deployed |
||
Release 0.2 |
Provides Reliability of Close |
Deployment Q1 '03 |
Building America's Lending Leader
Revenue Stabilization
Insurance Revenue
Segment Income Statement
|
YTD 6/30/02 |
YTD 6/30/01 |
(%) change |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(in millions) |
||||||||
Net interest income after provision | $ | 1,525 | $ | 887 | 72 | % | |||
Noninterest income* |
998 |
608 |
64 |
||||||
Noninterest expense |
1,102 |
517 |
113 |
||||||
Net income |
873 |
603 |
45 |
HomeSide Lending Acquisition Announced
Summary
SPECIALTY FINANCE
Second Quarter 2002
Craig Chapman
Group President
Forward-Looking Statements
"This presentation contains forward-looking statements, which are not historical facts and pertain to future operating results. These forward-looking statements are within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and other statements contained in this document that are not historical facts. When used in this presentation, the words "expects," "anticipates," "intends," "plans," "believes," "seeks," "estimates," or words of similar meaning, or future or conditional verbs, such as "will," "would," "should," "could," or "may" are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, these forward-looking statements are subject to assumptions with respect to future business strategies and decisions that are subject to change. Actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in these forward-looking statements for the reasons, among others, discussed under the heading "BusinessFactors That May Affect Future Results" in Washington Mutual's 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K and under the heading, "Cautionary Statements," in Washington Mutual's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, which include: changes in general business and economic conditions may significantly affect our earnings; the risk that our inability to effectively manage the volatility of our mortgage banking business could adversely affect our earnings; the risk that the impact of rising interest rates may result in an increase in our cost of interest-bearing liabilities, which could outpace the increase in the yield on interest-earning assets and lead to a reduction in the net interest margin; the risk that our inability to effectively integrate the operations and personnel of companies we have acquired could adversely affect our earnings and financial condition; the concentration of operations in California could adversely affect our operating results if the California economy or real estate market declines; competition from other financial services companies in our markets could adversely affect our ability to achieve our financial goals; changes in the regulation of financial services companies could adversely affect our business.
Business Segment Financial Information
Business segment financial information is prepared for management information purposes and uses methodologies which do not conform to generally accepted accounting principles. These methodologies include internal allocations of the cost of funds, hedge gains or losses, loan loss provisions and certain overhead items.
Our Segment
Segment Focus*
Market Position
Our Mission
To drive higher growth, higher returns and diversify risk while accelerating Washington Mutual's evolution into the nation's leading middle-market financial services company
Overall Objectives
Goals
Segment Business Model
Multi-FamilyMarket Size of $1.3 trillion*
Source: National Multi Housing Council study, released 2001
Multi-FamilyTop 10 Originators in 2000
Rank |
Institution |
Loans |
# of Loans |
Avg. Loan |
Loans % of Total |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
($ in thousands) |
|
||||||||
1 | Washington Mutual | $ | 2,520 | 2,389 | $ | 1,055 | 9.4 | % | |||||
2 | Wachovia/ First Union | 1,772 | 430 | 4,120 | 6.6 | ||||||||
3 | ARCS Commercial Mortgage | 1,531 | 263 | 5,820 | 5.7 | ||||||||
4 | California Federal Bank | 892 | 511 | 1,746 | 3.3 | ||||||||
5 | Dime Bancorp | 767 | 369 | 2,077 | 2.9 | ||||||||
6 | GMAC Commercial Mortgage | 721 | 137 | 5,265 | 2.7 | ||||||||
7 | LaSalle Bank | 713 | 1,347 | 529 | 2.7 | ||||||||
8 | World Savings | 663 | 903 | 734 | 2.5 | ||||||||
9 | Bank of America | 639 | 166 | 3,849 | 2.4 | ||||||||
10 | American Property Financing | 515 | 46 | 11,186 | 1.9 | ||||||||
Other Reporting Originators | 16,880 | 21,287 | 793 | 62.9 | |||||||||
Multi-Family Originations | $ | 26,829 | 27,846 | $ | 963 | 100.0 | % |
Multi-Family OriginationsMarket Share
Multi-FamilyOur Advantages
Multi-FamilyTop 20 Markets*
1. | New York City | $ | 294 | ||
2. | San Francisco | 114 | |||
3. | Los Angeles | 112 | |||
4. | Boston | 56 | |||
5. | Chicago | 53 | |||
6. | Washington DC | 47 | |||
7. | San Diego | 33 | |||
8. | Orange County | 30 | |||
9. | Atlanta | 30 | |||
10. | Newark | 29 | |||
11. | Philadelphia | 28 | |||
12. | Miami | 28 | |||
13. | Seattle | 26 | |||
14. | Houston | 22 | |||
15. | Minneapolis | 20 | |||
16. | Dallas | 19 | |||
17. | Detroit | 18 | |||
18. | Denver | 18 | |||
19. | Phoenix | 14 | |||
20. | Fort Lauderdale | 14 |
Multi-Family FocusExpand to New Markets
National Operations Center
Capital Markets Strategy
Segment Net Income
Segment Net Interest Income
Segment Noninterest Income
Segment Noninterest Expense
Multi-Family and CRE Originations
Multi-Family Lending Performance Metrics(a)
|
6/30/01 |
6/30/02 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
($ in millions) |
||||||
Loans & MBS Outstanding(b) | $ | 15,724 | $ | 17,051 | |||
Average Loan & MBS Yield | 8.15 | % | 6.13 | % | |||
Delinquencies(c) | 0.35 | % | 0.08 | % | |||
Nonaccruals | 0.17 | % | 0.02 | % |
Other Commercial Lending Performance Metrics
|
6/30/01 |
6/30/02 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
($ in millions) |
||||||
Loans & MBS Outstanding(a) | $ | 9,639 | $ | 10,739 | |||
Average Loan & MBS Yield | 8.31 | % | 6.45 | % | |||
Delinquencies(b) | 2.03 | % | 4.45 | % | |||
Nonaccruals | 1.72 | % | 3.90 | % |
Consumer Finance Profile
Consumer Finance
Performance Metrics
|
6/30/01 |
6/30/02 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
($ in millions) |
||||||
Receivables Outstanding | $ | 3,781 | $ | 3,935 | |||
Average Receivables Yield | 15.53 | % | 14.97 | % | |||
Efficiency Ratio | 42.13 | % | 38.66 | % | |||
Delinquency 60+* | 2.91 | % | 3.17 | % |
CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT
Second Quarter 2002
Jim Vanasek
Executive Vice President
and Chief Credit Risk Officer
Forward-Looking Statements
"This presentation contains forward-looking statements, which are not historical facts and pertain to future operating results. These forward-looking statements are within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and other statements contained in this document that are not historical facts. When used in this presentation, the words "expects," "anticipates," "intends," "plans," "believes," "seeks," "estimates," or words of similar meaning, or future or conditional verbs, such as "will," "would," "should," "could," or "may" are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, these forward-looking statements are subject to assumptions with respect to future business strategies and decisions that are subject to change. Actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in these forward-looking statements for the reasons, among others, discussed under the heading "BusinessFactors That May Affect Future Results" in Washington Mutual's 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K and under the heading, "Cautionary Statements," in Washington Mutual's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, which include: changes in general business and economic conditions may significantly affect our earnings; the risk that our inability to effectively manage the volatility of our mortgage banking business could adversely affect our earnings; the risk that the impact of rising interest rates may result in an increase in our cost of interest-bearing liabilities, which could outpace the increase in the yield on interest-earning assets and lead to a reduction in the net interest margin; the risk that our inability to effectively integrate the operations and personnel of companies we have acquired could adversely affect our earnings and financial condition; the concentration of operations in California could adversely affect our operating results if the California economy or real estate market declines; competition from other financial services companies in our markets could adversely affect our ability to achieve our financial goals; changes in the regulation of financial services companies could adversely affect our business.
Business Segment Financial Information
Business segment financial information is prepared for management information purposes and uses methodologies which do not conform to generally accepted accounting principles. These methodologies include internal allocations of the cost of funds, hedge gains or losses, loan loss provisions and certain overhead items.
Risk Exposure by Loan Type
Risk Exposure by Geography
Asset QualitySFR
|
Portfolio(a) (in billions) |
Delinquencies(b)/ Portfolio |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12/31/01 | $ | 84.6 | 2.58 | % | ||
3/31/02 | 88.9 | 2.77 | ||||
6/30/02 | 87.3 | (c) | 2.35 |
Asset QualitySMF(a)
|
Portfolio(b) (in billions) |
Delinquencies(c)/ Portfolio |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12/31/01 | $ | 9.8 | 6.51 | % | ||
3/31/02 | 10.5 | 6.56 | ||||
6/30/02 | 10.6 | 6.31 |
Asset QualityCRE: Multi-family
|
Portfolio (in billions) |
Delinquencies*/ Portfolio |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12/31/01 | $ | 15.6 | 0.52 | % | ||
3/31/02 | 17.2 | 0.62 | ||||
6/30/02 | 17.6 | 0.44 |
Asset QualityOther CRE
|
Portfolio (in billions) |
Delinquencies*/ Portfolio |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12/31/01 | $ | 4.5 | 7.25 | % | ||
3/31/02 | 6.9 | 5.32 | ||||
6/30/02 | 6.8 | 4.37 |
Asset QualityConsumer Loans(a):
Banking Subsidiaries
|
Portfolio (in billions) |
Delinquencies(b)/ Portfolio |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12/31/01 | $ | 10.5 | 1.77 | % | ||
3/31/02 | 15.1 | 1.28 | ||||
6/30/02 | 16.7 | (c) | 1.11 |
Asset QualityConsumer Loans: WM Finance
|
Portfolio (in billions) |
Delinquencies*/ Portfolio |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12/31/01 | $ | 2.6 | 8.11 | % | ||
3/31/02 | 2.6 | 7.83 | ||||
6/30/02 | 2.7 | 7.13 |
Asset QualityCommercial
|
Portfolio (in billions) |
Delinquencies*/ Portfolio |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12/31/01 | $ | 5.4 | 4.39 | % | ||
3/31/02 | 5.2 | 4.98 | ||||
6/30/02 | 5.0 | 4.50 |
SFR*NPA % Trend
SMFNPA % Trend
CRE: Multi-FamilyNPA % Trend
Other CRENPA % Trend
Commercial LoansNPA % Trend
Consumer Loans*: Banking SubsidiariesNPA % Trends
Consumer Loans: WM FinanceNPA % Trend
Nonperforming Assets
|
12/31/01 |
3/31/02 |
6/30/02 |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(in millions) |
||||||||
Nonaccrual Loans | $ | 2,030 | $ | 2,391 | $ | 2,232 | |||
+ Foreclosed Assets | 228 | 267 | 274 | ||||||
= Nonperforming Assets | $ | 2,258 | $ | 2,658 | $ | 2,506 |
Foreclosed Assets
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses*
|
(in millions) |
||
---|---|---|---|
Allocated | $ | 1,154 | |
Unallocated | 511 | ||
Total reserves | $ | 1,665 |
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses3 Year Trend
Net Charge Offs and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
|
WM 6/30/02 |
Thrift Peers(a) 3/31/02 |
Bank Peers(a) 3/31/02 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net Charge Offs(b)/Average Loans(c) | 0.31 | % | 0.32 | % | 1.39 | % | |
ALLL/Total Loans(c) | 1.14 | 0.89 | 2.07 |
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
|
ALLL |
Provision |
Net Charge offs |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(in millions) |
||||||||
Q2 2001 | $ | 1,170 | $ | 92 | $ | 75 | |||
Q3 2001 | 1,295 | 200 | 75 | ||||||
Q4 2001 | 1,404 | 200 | 97 | ||||||
Q1 2002 | 1,621 | 175 | 99 | ||||||
Q2 2002 | 1,665 | 160 | 116 |
MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT
Second Quarter 2002
Bill Longbrake
Vice Chair, Enterprise Risk Management and
Chief Financial Officer
Forward-Looking Statements
"This presentation contains forward-looking statements, which are not historical facts and pertain to future operating results. These forward-looking statements are within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and other statements contained in this document that are not historical facts. When used in this presentation, the words "expects," "anticipates," "intends," "plans," "believes," "seeks," "estimates," or words of similar meaning, or future or conditional verbs, such as "will," "would," "should," "could," or "may" are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, these forward-looking statements are subject to assumptions with respect to future business strategies and decisions that are subject to change. Actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in these forward-looking statements for the reasons, among others, discussed under the heading "BusinessFactors That May Affect Future Results" in Washington Mutual's 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K and under the heading, "Cautionary Statements," in Washington Mutual's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, which include: changes in general business and economic conditions may significantly affect our earnings; the risk that our inability to effectively manage the volatility of our mortgage banking business could adversely affect our earnings; the risk that the impact of rising interest rates may result in an increase in our cost of interest-bearing liabilities, which could outpace the increase in the yield on interest-earning assets and lead to a reduction in the net interest margin; the risk that our inability to effectively integrate the operations and personnel of companies we have acquired could adversely affect our earnings and financial condition; the concentration of operations in California could adversely affect our operating results if the California economy or real estate market declines; competition from other financial services companies in our markets could adversely affect our ability to achieve our financial goals; changes in the regulation of financial services companies could adversely affect our business.
Business Segment Financial Information
Business segment financial information is prepared for management information purposes and uses methodologies which do not conform to generally accepted accounting principles. These methodologies include internal allocations of the cost of funds, hedge gains or losses, loan loss provisions and certain overhead items.
Management Objective
Interest Rate Impacts
Impact of Rate Movements
Interest Rate Risk DriversNet Interest Income
Net Interest Margin Throughout the Cycle
Interest Rate Risk DriversBalance Sheet Size
Balance Sheet Grows as Rates Rise
Historical Rising Rate Scenario |
Q3 1999 |
Q4 1999 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net Interest Margin | 2.64 | % | 2.41 | % | |||
Ending Assets | $ | 181 | B | $ | 187 | B |
Balance Sheet Contracts as Rates Fall
Historical Falling Rate Scenario |
Q2 2001 |
Q3 2001 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net Interest Margin | 3.21 | % | 3.53 | % | |||
Ending Assets | $ | 229 | B | $ | 224 | B |
Strategies to Mitigate NII Sensitivity
Transactions to Mitigate NII Sensitivity to Rising Rates
2001 Transactions
Net Income Sensitivity Results
Net Income and Net Interest Income Sensitivity
|
Down 100 bps |
Up 200 bps |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net Income change for the one-year period beginning: | ||||||
July 1, 2002 | (0.76 | )% | 0.21 | % | ||
January 1, 2002 | 2.19 | (2.76 | ) | |||
Net Interest Income change for the one-year period beginning: |
||||||
July 1, 2002 | (0.44 | )% | (2.30 | )% | ||
January 1, 2002 | 1.47 | (5.18 | ) |
Interest Rate Risk DriversMortgage Banking
Changes in Mortgage Servicing Rights
Strategies to Mitigate MSR Fair Value Sensitivity
Strategies to Mitigate MSR Fair Value Sensitivity
Transactions to Mitigate MSR Sensitivity
2002 Transactions as of June 30th
SFR Mortgage Banking Income (Expense) Adjusted for Financial Hedging Transactions
|
Q2 2002 |
Q1 2002 |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Loan servicing fees | $ | 598 | $ | 555 | |||
Amortization of MSR | (504 | ) | (479 | ) | |||
MSR recovery (impairment) | (1,107 | ) | 45 | ||||
Other, net | (78 | ) | (62 | ) | |||
Loan related income | 120 | 81 | |||||
Gain from mortgage loans | 220 | 251 | |||||
Gain from sale of originated MBS | 18 | 2 | |||||
Total SFR mortgage banking income (expense) | (733 | ) | 393 | ||||
Gain from AFS securities |
137 |
(298 |
) |
||||
Gain on extinguishment of securities sold under agreements to repurchase | 121 | 74 | |||||
Revaluation gain (loss) from derivatives | 857 | (15 | ) | ||||
Total mortgage banking fees, net of financial hedges |
$ |
382 |
$ |
154 |
Interest Rate Risk Summary
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereto duly authorized.
WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC. | |||
By: |
/s/ WILLIAM W. EHRLICH William W. Ehrlich Executive Vice President, Corporate Relations |
Date: September 10, 2002