UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended January 31, 2010

or

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number: 1-14315

NCI BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		76-0127701
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)
10943 N. Sam Houston Parkway W.
Houston, TX		77064
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes  o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). o Yes  o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes  þ No

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY
PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. o Yes  o No

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Common Stock, $.01 par value—18,086,160 shares as of March 8, 2010 (after giving effect to the reverse stock split that became effective on March 5, 2010)

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

				PAGE
Part I — Financial Information
Item 1.		Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
		Consolidated Balance Sheets January 31, 2010 and November 1, 2009			1
		Consolidated Statements of Operations Fiscal Three Months Ended January 31, 2010 and February 1, 2009			2
		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Fiscal Three Months Ended January 31, 2010 and February 1, 2009			3
		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements			4-24
Item 2.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			24-36
Item 3.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			36-38
Item 4.		Controls and Procedures			38-39

				PAGE
Part II — Other Information
Item 1.		Legal Proceedings			40
Item 1A.		Risk Factors			40-41
Item 2.		Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			41
Item 5.		Other Information			41
Item 6.		Exhibits			41
Signatures					42
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-32.2

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

NCI BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
(2009 As Adjusted (Note 2))

		January 31, 2010				November 1, 2009
		(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	77,666			$	90,419
Restricted cash, current			4,207				5,154
Accounts receivable, net			61,085				82,889
Inventories, net			89,980				71,537
Deferred income taxes			18,989				18,787
Income tax receivable			33,592				27,622
Investments in debt and equity securities, at market			3,529				3,359
Prepaid expenses and other			13,081				14,494
Assets held for sale			3,930				4,963
Total current assets			306,059				319,224
Property, plant and equipment, net			225,933				232,510
Goodwill			5,200				5,200
Intangible assets, net			27,856				28,370
Restricted cash, net of current portion			—				7,825
Other assets			19,865				21,389
Total assets		$	584,913			$	614,518
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt		$	14,434			$	14,164
Note payable			—				481
Accounts payable			71,313				73,594
Accrued compensation and benefits			30,592				37,215
Accrued interest			1,844				776
Other accrued expenses			42,492				52,455
Total current liabilities			160,675				178,685
Long-term debt			135,569				136,085
Deferred income taxes			18,891				18,848
Other long-term liabilities			7,785				8,007
Total long-term liabilities			162,245				162,940
Series B cumulative convertible participating preferred stock			230,949				222,815
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, $.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 18,086,390 and 18,082,029 issued and outstanding			908				904
Additional paid-in capital			279,344				288,093
Accumulated deficit			(240,546	)			(230,060	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss			(8,662	)			(8,859	)
Treasury stock, at cost			—				—
Total stockholders’ equity			31,044				50,078
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		$	584,913			$	614,518

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

NCI BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
(2009 As Adjusted (Note 2))

		Fiscal Three Months Ended
		January 31, 2010				February 1, 2009
Sales		$	182,887			$	260,364
Cost of sales			149,669				213,842
Lower of cost or market adjustment			—				29,378
Asset impairments			1,029				623
Gross profit			32,189				16,521
Selling, general and administrative expenses			44,408				54,316
Goodwill and other intangible asset impairment			—				517,628
Restructuring charge			524				2,479
Loss from operations			(12,743	)			(557,902	)
Interest income			25				195
Interest expense			(4,532	)			(6,818	)
Debt extinguishment and refinancing costs			(174	)			—
Other income (expense), net			1,159				(317	)
Loss before income taxes			(16,265	)			(564,842	)
Benefit for income taxes			(5,779	)			(34,861	)
Net loss		$	(10,486	)		$	(529,981	)
Convertible preferred stock dividends and accretion			8,134				—
Convertible preferred stock beneficial conversion feature			187				—
Net loss applicable to common shares		$	(18,807	)		$	(529,981	)
Loss per share:
Basic		$	(1.04	)		$	(136.32	)
Diluted		$	(1.04	)		$	(136.32	)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic			18,093				3,888
Diluted			18,093				3,888

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

NCI BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
(2009 As Adjusted (Note 2))

		Fiscal Three Months Ended
		January 31, 2010				February 1, 2009
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss		$	(10,486	)		$	(529,981	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization			8,701				8,649
Non-cash interest expense on Convertible Notes			—				2,099
Share-based compensation expense			801				1,372
Loss on sale of property, plant and equipment			103				11
Lower of cost or market reserve			—				29,378
Provision for doubtful accounts			(416	)			975
Gain on embedded derivative			(919	)			—
Provision (benefit) for deferred income taxes			45				(17,380	)
Asset impairments			1,029				623
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets			—				517,628
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of acquisitions:
Accounts receivable			22,231				76,865
Inventories			(18,443	)			19,725
Income tax receivable			(4,253	)			(1,608	)
Prepaid expenses and other			(233	)			(376	)
Accounts payable			(1,468	)			(21,028	)
Accrued expenses			(15,836	)			(55,778	)
Other, net			(32	)			(1,002	)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:			(19,176	)			30,172
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures			(1,287	)			(7,016	)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment			52				51
Other, net			—				67
Net cash used in investing activities:			(1,235	)			(6,898	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from stock options exercised			—				12
Decrease in restricted cash			8,772				—
Payments on long-term debt			(190	)			(230	)
Payments on note payable			(481	)			—
Payment of convertible notes			(59	)			—
Proceeds from ABL Facility			3				—
Payment of refinancing costs			—				(18	)
Purchase of treasury stock			(379	)			(413	)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities:			7,666				(649	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents			(8	)			16
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents			(12,753	)			22,641
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period			90,419				68,201
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period		$	77,666			$	90,842

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

NCI BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JANUARY 31, 2010
(Unaudited)
(2009 As Adjusted (Note 2))

NOTE 1 — BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements for NCI Building Systems, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our”) have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, which consist of normal recurring entries except as otherwise disclosed, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been made. Operating results for the fiscal three month period ended January 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2010. Our sales and earnings are subject to both seasonal and cyclical trends and are influenced by general economic conditions, interest rates, the price of steel relative to other building materials, the level of nonresidential construction activity, roof repair and retrofit demand and the availability and cost of financing for construction projects.

On March 5, 2010 (the “Effective Time”), the Company effected a reverse stock split in which each five shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 (the “Common Stock” and shares thereof, the “Common Shares”) was reclassified and combined into one share of Common Stock (the “Reverse Stock Split”). As such, we have retrospectively adjusted basic and diluted earnings per share, Common Stock, stock options, Common Stock equivalents and prices per share information for the Reverse Stock Split in all periods presented. See Note 18 — Subsequent Events.

We use a four-four-five week calendar each quarter with year end on the Sunday closest to October 31. The year end for fiscal 2010 is October 31, 2010.

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts in our consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of income to conform to the current presentation.

For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 1, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

NOTE 2 —ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

Debt with Conversion and Other Options and Earnings per Share Adoption

On November 2, 2009, we adopted ASC Subtopic 470-20, Debt with Conversion and Other Options (“ASC 470-20”), which clarifies the accounting for convertible debt instruments that may be settled entirely or partially in cash upon conversion. ASC 470-20 has been applied retrospectively to fiscal years 2005 through 2009 as it relates to our now retired 2.125% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes (the “Convertible Notes”). ASC 470-20 changed the accounting for certain convertible debt instruments, including our Convertible Notes. Under the new rules, an entity shall separately account for the liability and equity components of the instrument in a manner that reflects the issuer’s economic interest cost or the issuer’s nonconvertible debt (unsecured debt) borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized. This results in the bifurcation of a component of the debt, classification of that component in equity and the accretion of the resulting discount on the debt to be recognized as part of interest expense. Once adopted, ASC 470-20 requires retrospective application to the terms of the instrument as it existed for all periods presented.

The effect of ASC 470-20 for our Convertible Notes is that the equity component has been included in the paid-in-capital section of stockholders’ equity on our consolidated balance sheet and the value of the equity component is treated as an original issue discount for purposes of accounting for the debt component of the Convertible Notes. Higher interest expense is recorded by recognizing the accretion of the discounted carrying value of the Convertible Notes to their face amount as interest expense over the term of the Convertible Notes using an effective interest rate method. Income taxes have been recorded on the foregoing adjustments. While this accounting pronouncement does not change the economic substance or cash flow requirements for the Convertible Notes, the amount reported as interest expense in our historical consolidated statement of operations increases due to the accretion of the discounted carrying value of the Convertible Notes to their face amount. The impact of adopting ASC 470-20 has resulted in the reported interest expense on our Convertible Notes increasing from 2.125% to 7.5%. See Note 10 — Debt and Note Payable.

We capitalize interest on capital invested in projects in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) guidance codified under ASC Topic 835, Interest. As a result of adopting ASC 470-20, capitalized interest for fiscal 2009 increased by $0.2 million. Upon commencement of operations, capitalized interest, as a component of the total cost of the asset, is amortized over the estimated useful life of the asset.

In October 2009, we completed an exchange offer (the “Exchange Offer”) to acquire $180 million aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Notes in return for cash and shares of our Common Stock. On December 29, 2009, we redeemed the remaining $58,750 principal amount of the Convertible Notes outstanding after the closing of the Exchange Offer. Therefore, we will not have additional prospective interest expense following the adoption of ASC 470-20.

In June 2008, the FASB issued guidance that has been codified under ASC Subtopic 260-10, Earnings per Share (“ASC 260-10”). This pronouncement provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are “participating securities” and, therefore, should be included in computing earnings per share using the two-class method. We adopted ASC 260-10 on November 2, 2009. All prior period earnings per share data have been adjusted retrospectively to conform to the provisions of this pronouncement. See Note 8—Earnings Per Common Share.

The following table sets forth the effect of the retrospective application of ASC 470-20 and ASC 260-10 on certain previously reported line items (in thousands, except per share data):

Consolidated Statements of Operations:

		February 1, 2009
		Originally				As
		Reported				Adjusted
Cost of sales		$	213,836			$	213,842
Gross profit			16,527				16,521
Selling, general and administrative expenses			54,307				54,316
Loss from operations			(557,887	)			(557,902	)
Interest expense			4,608				6,818
Loss before income taxes			(562,617	)			(564,842	)
Benefit for income taxes			(34,007	)			(34,861	)
Net loss			(528,610	)			(529,981	)
Net loss applicable to common shares		$	(528,610	)		$	(529,981	)
Loss per share:
Basic			(135.98	)			(136.32	)
Diluted			(135.98	)			(136.32	)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic			3,888				3,888
Diluted			3,888				3,888

Consolidated Balance Sheets:

		November 1, 2009
		Originally				As
		Reported				Adjusted
Property, plant and equipment		$	231,840			$	232,510
Total assets			613,848				614,518
Deferred income tax liability			18,591				18,848
Total long-term liabilities			162,683				162,940
Additional paid-in capital			263,620				288,093
Retained earnings			(206,000	)			(230,060	)
Total stockholders’ equity			49,665				50,078
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity			613,848				614,518

Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Adoption

In September 2006, the FASB issued guidance that has been codified under ASC Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820-10”). This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. We adopted ASC 820-10 on November 3, 2008 for financial assets and financial liabilities carried at fair value and non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis. The

adoption of ASC 820-10 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. See Note 13—Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements.

In February 2008, the FASB issued additional guidance codified under ASC 820-10. This additional guidance partially delayed the effective date for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). We adopted the additional guidance in ASC 820-10 on November 2, 2009 for nonrecurring, non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value. The adoption of ASC 820-10 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. See Note 13—Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements.

Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements Adoption

In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements—a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force (“ASU 2009-13”), which provides guidance on whether multiple deliverables exist, how the arrangement should be separated and the consideration allocated. ASU 2009-13 requires an entity to allocate revenue in an arrangement using estimated selling prices of deliverables if a vendor does not have vendor-specific objective evidence or third-party evidence of selling price. ASU 2009-13 is effective for the first annual reporting period beginning on or after June 15, 2010 and may be applied retrospectively for all periods presented or prospectively to arrangements entered into or materially modified after the adoption date. Early adoption is permitted provided that the revised guidance is retroactively applied to the beginning of the year of adoption. We early adopted ASU 2009-13 on November 2, 2009. The adoption of ASC 820-10 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2008, the FASB issued guidance that has been codified under ASC Subtopic 715-20, Defined Benefit Plans — General (“ASC 715-20”). ASC 715-20 provides guidance on an employer’s disclosures about plan assets of a defined benefit pension or other postretirement plan. The disclosures about plan assets required by ASC 715-20 are effective for our fiscal year ended 2010 and are not required for earlier periods presented for comparative purposes. We will adopt the disclosure provisions required by ASC 715-20 in our consolidated financial statements as of and for the period ended October 31, 2010.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (“ASU 2010-06”). This ASU amends FASB ASU 820-10-50 to require new disclosures concerning (1) transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value measurement hierarchy, and (2) activity in Level 3 measurements. In addition, ASU 2010-06 clarifies certain existing disclosure requirements regarding the level of disaggregation and inputs and valuation techniques. Finally, ASU No. 2010-06 makes conforming amendments to the guidance on employers’ disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets. ASU 2010-06 is effective for us on May 2, 2010, except for the requirement to separately disclose activity in Level 3 measurements which is effective for our fiscal year ended 2012. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of ASU 2010-06 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 3 — PLANT RESTRUCTURING AND ASSET IMPAIRMENT

As a result of the market downturn which began in fiscal 2008, we implemented a phased process to resize and realign our manufacturing operations. The purpose of these closures is to rationalize our least efficient facilities and to retool certain of these facilities to allow us to better utilize our assets and expand into new markets or better provide products to our customers, such as insulated panel systems.

In November 2008, we approved the Phase I plan to close three of our engineered building systems manufacturing plants. In addition, as part of the Phase I restructuring, we implemented a general employee reduction program. In a continuing effort to rationalize our least efficient facilities, in February 2009, we approved the Phase II plan to close one of our facilities within the engineered building systems segment, and in April 2009, we approved the Phase III plan to close or idle three of our manufacturing facilities within the engineered building systems segment and two facilities within the metal components segment. In addition, manufacturing at one of our metal components facilities was temporarily suspended and the facility currently functions as a distribution and customer service site. As part of the Phase III restructuring, we also added to the general employee reduction program. As a result of actions taken in our restructuring, certain facilities are being actively marketed for sale and in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009 were classified as held for sale in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. We plan to sell these facilities by the end of fiscal 2010. During the three months ended January 31, 2010, we recorded an additional $1.0 million impairment for the Lockeford facility which is classified as held for sale as a result of deteriorating market conditions.

The following table summarizes our restructuring plan costs and charges related to the General, Phase I, Phase II and Phase III restructuring plans during each of the periods presented (in thousands):

		Fiscal Three												Cost				Remaining				Total
		Months Ended												Incurred				Anticipated				Anticipated
		January 31, 2010				Fiscal 2009				Fiscal 2008				to Date				Cost				Cost
General
Severance		$	2			$	2,987			$	87			$	3,076			$	—			$	3,076
Asset Relocation			—				—				—				—				—				—
Other Cash Costs			23				57				—				80				—				80
Asset Impairment			—				1,234				—				1,234				—				1,234
Total General Program			25				4,278				87				4,390				—				4,390
Repurposing and Phase I
Severance		$	58			$	1,016			$	106			$	1,180			$	—			$	1,180
Asset Relocation			—				303				—				303				—				303
Other Cash Costs			122				199				—				321				135				456
Asset Impairment			1,029				1,634				157				2,820				—				2,820
Total Plant Closing Phase I			1,209				3,152				263				4,624				135				4,759
Plant Closing Phase II
Severance		$	—			$	399			$	—			$	399			$	—			$	399
Asset Relocation			—				22				—				22				—				22
Other Cash Costs			—				442				—				442				—				442
Asset Impairment			—				30				—				30				—				30
Total Plant Closing Phase II			—				893				—				893				—				893
Plant Closing Phase III
Severance		$	10			$	2,349			$	—			$	2,359			$	10			$	2,369
Asset Relocation			—				219				—				219				122				341
Other Cash Costs			309				1,060				—				1,369				802				2,171
Asset Impairment			—				3,393				—				3,393				—				3,393
Total Plant Closing Phase III			319				7,021				—				7,340				934				8,274
Total All Programs		$	1,553			$	15,344			$	350			$	17,247			$	1,069			$	18,316
Restructuring by Segment
Buildings			415				7,522				61				7,998				855				8,853
Components			109				1,216				106				1,431				214				1,645
Coaters			—				103				—				103				—				103
Corporate			—				211				27				238				—				238
Total		$	524			$	9,052			$	194			$	9,770			$	1,069			$	10,839
Asset Impairments by Segment(1)
Buildings			1,029				4,316				157				5,502				—				5,502
Components			—				766				—				766				—				766
Coaters			—				—				—				—				—				—
Corporate			—				1,209				—				1,209				—				1,209
Total		$	1,029			$	6,291			$	157			$	7,477			$	—			$	7,477

The following table summarizes our restructuring liability related to the Phase I, Phase II and Phase III restructuring plans (in thousands):

		Employee or
		severance
		costs				Other costs				Total
Balance at November 1, 2009		$	1,387			$	—			$	1,387
Costs incurred			70				454				524
Cash payments			(781	)			(454	)			(1,235	)
Other adjustments (1)			10				—				10
Balance at January 31, 2010		$	685			$	—			$	685

On February 27, 2009, the Savings Plan was amended, effective January 1, 2009, to make the matching contributions fully discretionary and future contributions were temporarily suspended. Additional amounts may be contributed depending upon our annual return on assets.

NOTE 4 — RESTRICTED CASH

On May 21, 2009, we entered into a cash collateral agreement with our agent bank to obtain letters of credit secured by cash collateral which, in the aggregate, may not exceed $13.5 million. The restricted cash is invested in a cash bank account securing our agent bank. As of January 31, 2010, we had restricted cash in the amount of $4.2 million as collateral related to our $4.0 million of letters of credit. Restricted cash is classified as current as the underlying letters of credit expire prior to September 2010.

NOTE 5 — INVENTORIES

The components of inventory are as follows (in thousands):

		January 31, 2010				November 1, 2009
Raw materials		$	65,072			$	48,081
Work in process and finished goods			24,908				23,456
		$	89,980			$	71,537

In the three months ended February 1, 2009, we recorded a raw material inventory adjustment to the lower of cost or market in the amount of $(29.4) million because our inventory on hand at that time exceeded our current estimates of net realizable value less normal profit margins. Subsequent to August 2, 2009, all inventory with a lower of cost or market adjustment was fully utilized.

NOTE 6 — GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Our goodwill balance and changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by operating segment are as follows (in thousands):

		Metal								Engineered
		Coil				Metal				Building
		Coating				Components				Systems				Total
Balance as of November 2, 2008		$	98,959			$	147,240			$	370,427			$	616,626
Impairments			(59,854	)			(116,132	)			(332,904	)			(508,890	)
Balance as of February 1, 2009		$	39,105			$	31,108			$	37,523			$	107,736
Impairments			(39,105	)			(31,108	)			(32,323	)			(102,536	)
Balance as of January 31, 2010, November 1, 2009 and May 3, 2009		$	—			$	—			$	5,200			$	5,200

Based on lower than projected sales volumes in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 and based on a revised lower outlook for non-residential construction activity in 2009, management reduced the Company’s cash flow projections for fiscal year 2009. We concluded that this reduction was an impairment indicator requiring us to perform an interim goodwill impairment test for each of our six reporting units as of February 1, 2009. As a result of this impairment indicator, we updated the first step of our goodwill impairment test in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. The first step of our goodwill impairment test determines fair value of the reporting unit based on a blend of estimated discounted cash flows, publicly traded company multiples and acquisition multiples reconciled to our recent publicly traded stock price, including a reasonable control premium. The result from this model was then weighted and combined into a single estimate of fair value. We determined that our carrying value exceeded our fair value at most of our reporting units in each of our operating segments, indicating that goodwill was potentially impaired. As a result, we initiated the second step of the goodwill impairment test which involves calculating the implied fair value of our goodwill by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit to all assets and liabilities other than goodwill and comparing it to the carrying amount of goodwill. The fair value of each of the reporting unit’s assets and liabilities were determined based on a combination of prices of comparable businesses and present value techniques.

As of February 1, 2009, we estimated the market implied fair value of our goodwill was less than its carrying value by approximately $508.9 million, which was recorded as a goodwill impairment charge in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. This charge was an estimate based on the result of the preliminary allocation of fair value in the second step of the goodwill impairment test. However, due to the timing and complexity of the valuation calculations required under the second step of the test, we were not able to finalize our allocation of the fair value until the second quarter of fiscal 2009 with regard to property, plant and equipment and intangible assets in which their respective values are dependent on property, plant and equipment. The finalization was included in our goodwill impairment charge of $102.5 million that was recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2009.

Further declines in cash flow projections and the corresponding implementation of the Phase III restructuring plan caused management to determine that there was an indicator requiring us to perform another interim goodwill impairment test for each of our reporting units with goodwill remaining as of May 3, 2009. As a result of this impairment indicator, we again performed the first step of our goodwill impairment test in the second quarter of fiscal 2009, the results of which indicated that our carrying value exceeded

our fair value at most of our reporting units with goodwill remaining, indicating that goodwill was potentially impaired. We therefore initiated the second step of the goodwill impairment test. As of May 3, 2009, we determined the market implied fair value of our goodwill was less than the carrying value for certain reporting units by approximately $102.5 million, which was recorded as a goodwill impairment charge in the second quarter of fiscal 2009. As of January 31, 2010 and November 1, 2009, the remaining goodwill at one of our reporting units was $5.2 million.

As a result of the aforementioned goodwill impairment indicators and in accordance with ASC Subtopic 350-20, we performed an impairment analysis on our indefinite lived intangible asset related to RCC’s tradenames in our engineered building systems segment to determine the fair value in the first and second quarters of fiscal year 2009. Based on changes to our projected cash flows in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 and based on the lower projected cash flows and related Phase III restructuring plan in the second quarter of fiscal 2009, we determined the carrying cost exceeded the future fair value attributable to the intangible asset, and therefore we recorded impairment charges of $8.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 and $2.4 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 related to the intangible asset.

NOTE 7 — SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

Our 2003 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (“Incentive Plan”) is an equity-based compensation plan that allows us to grant a variety of types of awards, including stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance share awards, phantom stock awards and cash awards. In fiscal 2009, our stockholders approved the amendment and restatement of the Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance under the plan by approximately 0.2 million shares of Common Stock and provide for the extension of the effective date of the Incentive Plan to 10 years after its approval. As amended, the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the plan may not exceed 0.7 million.

On December 11, 2009, our board of directors approved the right of employees and officers to receive grants of 1.5 million shares of restricted stock and the right of officers to receive grants 1.8 million stock options, both of which are conditioned upon shareholder approval. Our 68% stockholder, had informed the Company in writing of its intention to vote in favor of the amendment and restatement of the Incentive Plan. Based on the approval of our board of directors and our 68% stockholder, we determined that the finalization of stockholder vote to approve the amendment and restatement of the Incentive Plan were perfunctory and we established a grant date of December 11, 2009 for the restricted stock and stock option awards. As discussed in Note 11—Series B Cumulative Convertible Participating Preferred Stock, the Company did not have sufficient common shares available to settle the restricted stock and stock option awards, and thus, we classified the awards as liability awards in accordance with ASC Subtopic 718-10, Compensation-Stock Compensation. At January 31, 2010, the liability balance of these awards was $0.7 million.

On December 22, 2009, our board of directors unanimously adopted a resolution to submit to a vote of our stockholders a proposal to approve an amendment and restatement of our Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance under the Incentive Plan by 5.7 million shares of Common Stock. On February 19, 2010, the stockholders approved the amendment and restatement of the Company’s Incentive Plan. The amendment and restatement of the Incentive Plan increased the number of Common Shares reserved for issuance under the Incentive Plan by 5.7 million to a total of 6.4 million Common Shares, increases the maximum number of shares that may be granted to an individual in any fiscal year to 0.9 million and extends the effective date of the Incentive Plan to 10 years after the date the Compensation Committee of the Company’s board of directors approved the amendments. See Note 18-Subsequent Events.

As of January 31, 2010, and for all periods presented, our share-based awards under this plan have consisted of restricted stock grants and stock option grants, neither of which can be settled through cash payments. Both our stock options and restricted stock awards contain only service condition requirements and typically vest over four years, although from time to time certain individuals have received special one-time restricted stock awards that vest at retirement, upon a change of control and on termination without cause or for good reason, as defined by the agreements governing such awards.

The fair value of each option award is estimated as of the date of grant using a Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing formula. Expected volatility is based on normalized historical volatility of our stock over a preceding period commensurate with the expected term of the option and adjusted to exclude the increased volatility associated with the liquidity issues the Company experienced in fiscal 2009 because this volatility is not relevant to the expected future volatility of the stock. The risk-free rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. Expected dividend yield was not considered in the option pricing formula since we do not pay dividends on our Common Stock and have no current plans to do so in the future. The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted during the three months ended January 31, 2010 was $4.07. The weighted average assumptions for the periods indicated are noted in the following table:

		Fiscal Three Months Ended
		January 31, 2010
Expected volatility			46.05	%
Expected term (in years)			5.75
Risk-free interest rate			2.44	%

The following is a summary of stock option transactions during the three months ended January 31, 2010 (in thousands, except weighted average exercise prices, weighted average remaining life):

						Weighted				Weighted
						Average				Average				Aggregate
		Number of				Exercise				Remaining				Intrinsic
		Shares				Price				Life				Value
Balance November 1, 2009			130			$	140.65
Granted			1,782				8.85
Cancelled			(8	)			(111.62	)
Exercised			—				—
Balance January 31, 2010			1.904			$	17.43			4.1 years					—
Exercisable at January 31, 2010			122			$	142.54			9.5 years					—

There were no options exercised during the first three months of fiscal 2010. The following summarizes additional information concerning outstanding options at January 31, 2010 (in thousands, except weighted average remaining life, weighted average exercise prices):

Options Outstanding
				Weighted Average				Weighted Average
Number of Options				Remaining Life				Exercise Price
	1,805			9.8 years				$	9.80
	43			4.1 years				$	136.31
	48			4.6 years				$	161.77
	8			5.9 years				$	225.14
	1,904			9.5 years				$	17.43

Options Exercisable
				Weighted Average
Number of Options				Exercise Price
	23			$	84.31
	43				136.31
	48				161.77
	8				225.15
	122			$	142.54

The fair value of restricted stock awards is based on the Company’s stock price as of the date of grant. Restricted stock transactions during the three months ended January 31, 2010 were as follows (in thousands, except weighted average grant prices):

						Weighted Average
		Number of Shares				Grant Price
Balance November 1, 2009			204			$	80.57
Granted			1,500				8.80
Distributed			—				—
Balance January 31, 2010			1,704			$	17.40

The total pre-tax share-based compensation cost that has been recognized in results of operations was $0.8 million and $1.4 million for the three months ended January 31, 2010 and February 1, 2009, respectively. Of these amounts, $0.8 million and $1.2 million for the

three months ended January 31, 2010 and February 1, 2009, respectively, were included in selling, general and administrative expense, with the remaining costs in each period in cost of goods sold. The total income tax benefit recognized in results of operations for share-based compensation arrangements was $0.3 million and $0.5 million for the three months ended January 31, 2010 and February 1, 2009, respectively. As of January 31, 2010 and February 1, 2009, there was approximately $21.6 million and $9.3 million, respectively, of total unrecognized compensation cost related to share-based compensation arrangements and this cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average remaining period of 4.2 years and 5.8 years, respectively.

Cash received from option exercises was insignificant during both of the first three months of fiscal 2010 and 2009.

NOTE 8 — EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

Basic loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss allocated to common shares by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted loss per common share considers the effect of common stock equivalents. The reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used for the computation of basic and diluted loss per share is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

		Fiscal Three Months Ended
		January 31, 2010				February 1, 2009
Numerator for Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share
Net loss applicable to common shares		$	(18,807	)		$	(529,981	)
Less net loss allocated to participating securities(1)			—				—
Net loss allocated to common shares		$	(18,807	)		$	(529,981	)
Denominator for Diluted Loss Per Share
Weighted average common shares outstanding for basic loss per share			18,093				3,888
Common stock equivalents:
Employee stock options			—				—
Unvested restricted stock awards			—				—
Adjusted weighted average shares and assumed conversions for diluted loss per share assuming dilution			18,093				3,888
Loss per share:
Basic		$	(1.04	)		$	(136.32	)
Diluted		$	(1.04	)		$	(136.32	)

As discussed in Note 2, we adopted guidance that has been codified under ASC Subtopic 260-10, Earnings Per Share (“ASC 260-10”) on November 2, 2009. This pronouncement provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are “participating securities” and, therefore, should be included in computing earnings per share using the two-class method. The calculation of earnings per share for Common Stock presented here has been reclassified to exclude the income attributable to the unvested restricted stock awards from the numerator and exclude the dilutive impact of those shares from the denominator. All prior period earnings per share data have been adjusted retrospectively to conform to the provisions of this pronouncement.

In connection with the Exchange Offer in October 2009, we issued 14.0 million shares of Common Stock. In addition to the Exchange Offer, our 2009 refinancing transaction included the issuance of $250.0 million in shares of a newly created series of our preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share, designated the Series B Cumulative Convertible Participating Preferred Stock (“Convertible Preferred Stock,” and shares thereof, “Preferred Shares”) which required the use of the “two-class” method in determining diluted earnings per share, but did not increase the weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding. The Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into 40.6 million shares of Common Stock.

Dividends on the Convertible Preferred Stock are payable, on a cumulative daily basis, as, if and when declared by our board of directors, at a rate per annum of 12% of the sum of the liquidation preference of $1,000 per Preferred Share plus accrued and unpaid dividends thereon or at a rate per annum of 8% of such liquidation preference and accrued and unpaid dividends if paid in cash on the dividend payment date on which such dividends would otherwise compound. This base dividend rate is subject to upward adjustment

upon and during certain defaults and is subject to downward adjustment in connection with the trading price of the Common Stock, in each case as specified in the Certificate of Designations of the Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Certificate of Designations”). We have the right to choose whether dividends are paid in cash or in-kind, subject to the conditions of the Amended Credit Agreement and Asset-Based Lending (“ABL”) Facility which restrict our ability to pay cash dividends until the first quarter of fiscal 2011 under the Amended Credit Agreement and until October 20, 2010 under the ABL Facility, except for certain specified purposes. The first dividend payment date for shares of Convertible Preferred Stock was December 15, 2009. The terms of the Convertible Preferred Stock require that such dividend be paid in cash, if at all. Due to the restrictions on cash dividend payments under our credit facilities, we were not permitted to pay this dividend. As a result, the dividend for the period up to the December 15, 2009 dividend payment date compounded at a rate of 12% per annum. See Note 11—Series B Cumulative Convertible Participating Preferred Stock for further information concerning dividends on the Convertible Preferred Stock.

For the three months ended January 31, 2010 and February 1, 2009, all options and unvested restricted shares were anti-dilutive and, therefore, not included in the diluted loss per share calculation.

NOTE 9 — WARRANTY

We sell weathertightness warranties to our customers for protection from leaks in our roofing systems related to weather. These warranties range from two years to 20 years. We sell two types of warranties, standard and Single Source™, and three grades of coverage for each. The type and grade of coverage determines the price to the customer. For standard warranties, our responsibility for leaks in a roofing system begins after 24 consecutive leak-free months. For Single Source™ warranties, the roofing system must pass our inspection before warranty coverage will be issued. Inspections are typically performed at three stages of the roofing project: (i) at the project start-up; (ii) at the project mid-point; and (iii) at the project completion. These inspections are included in the cost of the warranty. If the project requires or the customer requests additional inspections, those inspections are billed to the customer. Upon the sale of a warranty, we record the resulting revenue as deferred warranty revenue, which is included in other accrued expenses in our consolidated balance sheets. We recognize deferred warranty revenue over the warranty coverage period in a manner that matches our estimated expenses relating to the warranty. Additionally, we assumed a warranty obligation relating to our acquisition of Robertson-Ceco II Corporation (“RCC”) of $7.6 million which represents the fair value of the future warranty obligations at the time of purchase in April 2006. RCC’s accrued warranty programs have similar terms and characteristics to our other warranty programs.

The following table represents the rollforward of our RCC accrued warranty obligation and deferred warranty revenue activity for each of the fiscal three months ended (in thousands):

		Fiscal Three Months Ended
		January 31, 2010				February 1, 2009
Beginning balance		$	16,116			$	16,485
Warranties sold			756				614
Revenue recognized			(325	)			(310	)
Costs incurred			(309	)			(13	)
Adjustment (1)			—				(1,313	)
Other			(28	)			(128	)
Ending balance		$	16,210			$	15,335

NOTE 10 — DEBT AND NOTE PAYABLE

Debt is comprised of the following (in thousands):

		January 31, 2010				November 1, 2009
Amended and Restated Term Loan Credit Agreement (due April 2014, interest at 8.0% at both January 31, 2010 and November 1, 2009)		$	150,000			$	150,000
Asset-Based Lending Facility (due April 2014, interest at 6.75% at January 31, 2010)			3				—
2.125% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes, due November 2024			—				59
Industrial Revenue Bond			—				190
			150,003				150,249
Current portion of long-term debt			(14,434	)			(14,164	)
Long-term debt, less current portion		$	135,569			$	$136,085

The scheduled maturity of our debt is as follows (in thousands):

January 31, 2010 to October 31, 2010		$	14,094
2010			1,354
2011			1,340
2012			1,327
2013 and thereafter			131,888
		$	150,003

Amended Credit Agreement

On October 20, 2009, we entered into the Amended Credit Agreement, an amendment to our credit agreement that was in effect prior to such date (the “Credit Agreement”), pursuant to which we repaid $143.3 million of the $293.3 million in principal amount of term loans outstanding under such credit agreement and modified the terms and maturity of the remaining $150.0 million balance. The modified terms of the term loan require quarterly principal payments in an amount equal to 0.25% of the principal amount of the term loan then outstanding as of the last day of each calendar quarter and a final payment of approximately $131.1 million at maturity on April 20, 2014. We expect to make a mandatory prepayment on the Amended Credit Agreement in May 2010 in connection with our refund received resulting from the carry back of the 2009 net operating loss. Therefore, an additional $13.0 million in principal amount of the term loans under the Amended Credit Agreement have been classified as current portion of long-term debt in our Consolidated Balance Sheet at January 31, 2010 and November 1, 2009. At both January 31, 2010 and November 1, 2009, we had $150.0 million outstanding under our Amended Credit Agreement.

The Company’s obligations under the Amended Credit Agreement and any interest rate protection agreements or other permitted hedging agreement entered into with any lender under the Amended Credit Agreement are irrevocably and unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several basis by each direct and indirect domestic subsidiary of the Company (other than any domestic subsidiary that is a foreign subsidiary holding company or a subsidiary of a foreign subsidiary).

The obligations under the Amended Credit Agreement and under any permitted hedging agreement and the guarantees thereof are secured by (i) all of the capital stock and other equity interests of all direct domestic subsidiaries owned by the Company and the guarantors, (ii) up to 65% of the capital stock of certain direct foreign subsidiaries of the Company or any guarantor (it being understood that a foreign subsidiary holding company or a domestic subsidiary of a foreign subsidiary will be deemed a foreign subsidiary) and (iii) substantially all other tangible and intangible assets owned by the Company and each guarantor, including liens on material real property, in each case to the extent permitted by applicable law and subject to certain exceptions. The liens securing the obligations under the Amended Credit Agreement, the permitted hedging agreements and the guarantees thereof are first in priority (as between the Amended Credit Agreement and the ABL Facility) with respect to stock, material real property and assets other than accounts receivable, inventory, associated intangibles and certain other specified assets of the Company and the guarantors, subject to certain exceptions. Such liens are second in priority (as between the Amended Credit Agreement and the ABL Facility) with respect to accounts receivable, inventory, associated intangibles and certain other specified assets of the Company and the guarantors, subject to certain exceptions.

The Amended Credit Agreement contains a number of covenants that, among other things, limit or restrict our ability to dispose of assets, incur additional indebtedness, incur guarantee obligations, prepay other indebtedness, make dividends and other restricted payments, create liens, make investments, make acquisitions, engage in mergers, change the nature of their business and engage in certain transactions with affiliates.

The Amended Credit Agreement has no financial covenants until October 30, 2011 which is the conclusion of our fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011, at which time the maximum ratio of consolidated debt to EBITDA is 5 to 1. This ratio steps down by 0.25 each quarter until October 28, 2012 at which time the maximum ratio is 4 to 1. The ratio continues to step down by 0.125 each quarter until November 3, 2013 to a ratio of 3.5 to 1, which remains the maximum ratio for each fiscal quarter thereafter. We will, however, not be subject to this financial covenant with respect to a specified period if certain prepayments or repurchases of the term loans under the Amended Credit Agreement are made in the specified period. At January 31, 2010 and November 1, 2009, our Amended Credit Agreement did not require any financial covenant compliance.

Term loans under the Amended Credit Agreement may be repaid at any time, without premium or penalty but subject to customary LIBOR breakage costs. We also have the ability to repurchase a portion of the term loans under the Amended Credit Agreement, subject to certain terms and conditions set forth in the Amended Credit Agreement. In addition, subject to certain exceptions, the Amended Credit Agreement requires mandatory prepayment and reduction in an amount equal to:

•

the net cash proceeds of (1) certain asset sales, (2) certain debt offerings and (3) certain insurance recovery and condemnation events;

	•		50% of annual excess cash flow (as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement) for any fiscal year ending on or after October 31, 2010, unless a specified leverage ratio target is met; and
	•		the greater of $10.0 million and 50% of certain tax refunds received by the Company resulting from the carry back of the 2009 net operating loss received by the Company.

The Amended Credit Agreement limits our ability to pay cash dividends, except in certain specified circumstances, on or prior to October 31, 2010 after which time we may pay any dividend in an amount not to exceed the available amount (as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement). The available amount is defined in the Amended Credit Agreement as the sum of 50% of the consolidated net income from August 2, 2009 to the end of the most recent fiscal quarter, less 100% of any negative consolidated net income amount, plus net proceeds of property or assets received as capital contributions, less the sum of all dividends, payments or other distributions of such available amounts, in each case subject to certain adjustments and exceptions as specified in the Amended Credit Agreement.

The term loan under the Amended Credit Agreement bears interest, at our option, at either LIBOR or Base Rate plus an applicable margin. We had selected LIBOR interest rates for the period from November 2, 2009 through January 31, 2010 during which the applicable margin was 6%. Overdue amounts will bear interest at a rate that is 2% higher than the rate otherwise applicable. “Base Rate” is defined as the highest of (i) the Wachovia Bank, National Association prime rate, (ii) the overnight Federal Funds rate plus 0.5%, and (iii) 3%. “LIBOR” is defined as the applicable London interbank offered rate (not to be less than 2%) adjusted for reserves. The applicable margin until October 30, 2011 will be 5.00% on Base Rate loans and 6.00% on LIBOR loans under the Amended Credit Agreement.

ABL Facility

On October 20, 2009, the subsidiaries of the Company, NCI Group, Inc. and Robertson-Ceco II Corporation and the Company entered into the ABL Facility pursuant to a loan and security agreement that provided for a $125.0 million asset-based loan facility. The ABL Facility allows us an aggregate maximum borrowing of up to $125.0 million. Borrowing availability under the ABL Facility is determined by a monthly borrowing base collateral calculation that is based on specified percentages of the value of qualified cash, eligible inventory and eligible accounts receivable, less certain reserves and subject to certain other adjustments. At January 31, 2010 and November 1, 2009, our excess availability under the ABL Facility was $62.1 million and $70.4 million, respectively. The ABL Facility has a maturity of April 20, 2014 and includes borrowing capacity of up to $25 million for letters of credit and up to $10 million for swingline borrowings.

An unused commitment fee is paid monthly on the ABL Facility at an annual rate of 1% through May 1, 2010 and thereafter at 1% or, if the average daily balance of the loans and letters of credit obligations for a given month is higher than 50% of the maximum credit then available, 0.75%. The calculation is determined based on the amount by which the maximum credit exceeds the average daily principal balance of outstanding loans and letter of credit obligations. Additional customary fees in connection with the ABL Facility also apply.

The ABL Facility limits our ability to pay cash dividends, except in certain specified circumstances, prior to October 20, 2010, after which time we may pay dividends in the aggregate amount not to exceed an amount equal to 50% of the adjusted consolidated net income from August 3, 2009 to the end of the most recent fiscal quarter and subject to there being no event of default and the satisfaction of either certain excess availability conditions or a fixed charge coverage ratio.

The obligations of the borrowers under the ABL Facility are guaranteed by us and each direct and indirect domestic subsidiary of the Company (other than any domestic subsidiary that is a foreign subsidiary holding company or a subsidiary of a foreign subsidiary) that is not a borrower under the ABL Facility. Our obligations under certain specified bank products agreements are guaranteed by each borrower and each other direct and indirect domestic subsidiary of the Company and the other guarantors. These guarantees are made pursuant to a guarantee agreement, dated as of October 20, 2009, entered into by the Company and each other guarantor with Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC, as administrative agent.

The obligations under the ABL Facility and the guarantees thereof are secured by a first priority lien on our accounts receivable, inventory, certain deposit accounts, associated intangibles and certain other specified assets of the Company, subject to certain exceptions, and a second priority lien on the assets securing the term loans under the Amended Credit Agreement on a first-lien basis.

The ABL Facility contains a number of covenants that, among other things, limit or restrict our ability to dispose of assets, incur additional indebtedness, incur guarantee obligations, engage in sale and leaseback transactions, prepay other indebtedness, modify organizational documents and certain other agreements, create restrictions affecting subsidiaries, make dividends and other restricted payments, create liens, make investments, make acquisitions, engage in mergers, change the nature of their business and engage in certain transactions with affiliates.

Under the ABL Facility, a “Dominion Event” occurs if either an event of default is continuing or excess availability falls below certain levels, during which period, and for certain periods thereafter, the administrative agent may apply all amounts in the Company’s, the borrowers’ and the other guarantors’ concentration accounts to the repayment of the loans outstanding under the ABL Facility, subject to the Intercreditor Agreement and certain specified exceptions. In addition, during such Dominion Event, we are required to make mandatory payments on our ABL Facility upon the occurrence of certain events, including the sale of assets and the issuance of debt, in each case subject to certain limitations and conditions set forth in the ABL Facility.

The ABL Facility includes a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of one to one, which will apply if we fail to maintain a specified minimum level of borrowing capacity. The minimum level of borrowing capacity as of both January 31, 2010 and November 1, 2009 was $15.0 million.

Loans under the ABL Facility bear interest, at our option, as follows:

     (1) Base Rate loans at the Base Rate plus a margin, which shall be 3.50% through April 30, 2010 and shall thereafter range from 3.25% to 3.75% depending on the quarterly average excess availability under such facility, and

     (2) LIBOR loans at LIBOR plus a margin, which shall be 4.50% through April 30, 2010 and shall thereafter range from 4.25% to 4.75% depending on the quarterly average excess availability under such facility.

During an event of default, loans under the ABL Facility will bear interest at a rate that is 2% higher than the rate otherwise applicable. “Base Rate” is defined as the higher of the Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. prime rate and the overnight Federal Funds rate plus 0.5% and “LIBOR” is defined as the applicable London interbank offered rate adjusted for reserves.

Convertible Notes

As discussed in Note 2 — Accounting Pronouncements, on November 2, 2009, we adopted ASC 470-20 which clarifies the accounting for convertible debt instruments that may be settled entirely or partially in cash upon conversion. ASC 470-20 has been applied retrospectively to fiscal years 2005 through 2009 as it relates to our Convertible Notes. The debt and equity components recognized for our Convertible Notes were as follows (in thousands):

		January 31, 2010				November 1, 2009
Principal amount of Convertible Notes		$	—			$	59
Unamortized discount			—				—
Net carrying amount			—				59
Additional paid-in capital			24,473				24,473

In October 2009, we completed the Exchange Offer to acquire $180 million aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Notes. On December 29, 2009, we redeemed the remaining $58,750 principal amount of the Convertible Notes outstanding after the closing of the Exchange Offer. At January 31, 2010, there was no remaining recognition period of the unamortized discount.

The amount of interest expense recognized and effective interest rate for the three months ended January 31, 2010 and February 1, 2009 were as follows (in thousands):

		Fiscal Three Months Ended
		January 31, 2010				February 1, 2009
Contractual coupon interest		$	0.2			$	1,116
Amortization of discount on Convertible Notes			—				2,099
Interest expense		$	0.2			$	3,215
Effective interest rate			7.5	%			7.5	%

In fiscal 2009, we recorded debt extinguishment costs of $84.5 million. The debt extinguishment costs were determined based on the net of the inducement loss and the settlement gain. As the Convertible Notes were “Instrument C” as defined in ASC 815-15, Embedded Derivatives, we first considered the guidance in ASC 470-20, Debt with Conversion and Other Options, for any inducement to convert, and then considered the guidance in ASC 470-20 on the conversion of an instrument that would normally settle the conversion spread in shares and the face amount in cash. The result of this was that we recorded a loss of $84.5 million, which was the net impact of the loss incurred through the induced conversion offset by the gain recorded for the extinguishment of the recognized liability under conversion accounting. In accordance with the original conversion terms of the Convertible Notes, the

expected fair value of the consideration upon conversion is approximately $11.3 million (based on a $12.55 closing stock price for common stock as of October 19, 2009) as compared to the expected fair value of common stock issuable pursuant to the exchange offer of approximately $266.2 million ($176.2 million in common stock plus $90 million in cash). This resulted in an induced conversion charge of $254.8 million.

Additionally, we considered the original terms of the Convertible Notes, which required us to satisfy the accreted value of the obligation in cash and allowed us to satisfy the excess conversion value over the accreted value in either cash or shares. However, as of the date of the Convertible Notes were converted, the stated conversion price of the Convertible Notes was less than the stock price. Based upon the stated conversion terms of the Convertible Notes and the stock price on the date the Convertible Notes were converted, the value of the Company’s cash settlement to the holders of the Convertible Notes would have been approximately $11.3 million. Upon settlement of a security with the characteristics of Instrument C, ASC 470-20-40-12 requires only the cash payment be considered in the computation of the gain or loss on the extinguishment of the recognized liability. As of the close of the market on October 19, 2009, each conversion feature was worth a value of approximately $62.53 ($12.55 closing stock price x conversion rate of 24.98242 shares per $1,000 of principal). Accordingly, the Company recognized a gain of $937.47 for each note or $170.3 million. The change in conversion rate based on a $12.55 closing stock price for common stock as of October 19, 2009 resulted in a gain on extinguishment of the recognized liability of $170.3 million, in the aggregate.

Insurance Note payable

The note payable is related to financed insurance premiums and, as of November 1, 2009, we had outstanding a note payable in the amount of $0.5 million. Insurance premium financings are generally secured by the unearned premiums under such policies.

NOTE 11 — SERIES B CUMULATIVE CONVERTIBLE PARTICIPATING PREFERRED STOCK

The CD&R Equity Investment

On August 14, 2009, the Company entered into an Investment Agreement (as amended, the “Investment Agreement”), by and between the Company and Clayton, Dubilier & Rice Fund VIII, L.P. (“CD&R Fund VIII”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue and sell to CD&R Fund VIII, and CD&R Fund VIII agreed to purchase from the Company, for an aggregate purchase price of $250 million (less reimbursement to CD&R Fund VIII or direct payment to its service providers of up to $14.5 million in the aggregate of transaction expenses and a deal fee, paid to Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, Inc., the manager of CD&R Fund VIII, of $8.25 million), 250,000 shares of Convertible Preferred Stock. Pursuant to the Investment Agreement, on October 20, 2009 (the “Closing Date”), the Company issued and sold to CD&R Fund VIII and CD&R Friends & Family Fund VIII, L.P. (the “CD&R Funds”), and the CD&R Funds purchased from the Company, an aggregate of 250,000 Preferred Shares, representing approximately 39.2 million shares of Common Stock or 68.4% of the voting power and Common Stock of the Company on an as-converted basis (such purchase and sale, the “CD&R Equity Investment”).

Certain Terms of the Convertible Preferred Stock

In connection with the consummation of the CD&R Equity Investment, on October 19, 2009 we filed the Certificate of Designations, setting forth the terms, rights, powers, and preferences, and the qualifications, limitations and restrictions thereof, of the Convertible Preferred Stock.

Liquidation Value. Each Preferred Share has an initial liquidation preference of $1,000.

Rank. The Convertible Preferred Stock ranks senior as to dividend rights, redemption payments and rights upon liquidation to the Common Stock and each other class or series of our equity securities, whether currently issued or to be issued in the future, that by its terms ranks junior to the Convertible Preferred Stock, and junior to each class or series of equity securities of the Company, whether currently issued or issued in the future, that by its terms ranks senior to the Convertible Preferred Stock. We have no outstanding securities ranking senior to the Convertible Preferred Stock. Pursuant to the Certificate of Designations, the issuance of any senior securities of the Company requires the approval of the holders of the Convertible Preferred Stock.

Dividends. Dividends on the Convertible Preferred Stock are payable, on a cumulative daily basis, as and if declared by our board of directors, at a rate per annum of 12% of the sum of the liquidation preference of $1,000 per Preferred Share plus accrued and unpaid dividends thereon or at a rate per annum of 8% of the sum of the liquidation preference of $1,000 per Preferred Share plus any accrued and unpaid dividends thereon if paid in cash on the dividend payment date on which such dividends would otherwise compound. Members of our board of directors who are not affiliated with the CD&R Funds have the right to choose whether such dividends are paid in cash or in-kind, subject to the conditions of the Amended Credit Agreement and ABL Facility in which restrict our ability to pay cash dividends until the first quarter of fiscal 2011 under the Amended Credit Agreement and until October 20, 2010 under the ABL Facility, except for certain specified purposes.

The dividend rate will increase by 3% per annum above the rates described in the preceding paragraph upon and during certain defaults specified in the Certificate of Designations and, after June 30, 2011, will increase by up to 6% per annum above the rates described in the preceding paragraph upon and during any such specified default involving the Company’s failure to have a number of authorized and unissued shares of Common Stock reserved and available sufficient for the conversion of all outstanding Preferred Shares.

In addition to any dividends declared and paid as described in the preceding paragraphs, holders of the outstanding Preferred Shares also have the right to participate equally and ratably, on an as-converted basis, with the holders of shares of Common Stock in all cash dividends and distributions paid on the Common Stock.

If, at any time after the 30-month anniversary of the Closing Date, the trading price of the Common Stock exceeds 200% of the initial conversion price of the Convertible Preferred Stock (initially $1.2748, $6.3740 as adjusted for any stock dividends, splits, combinations or similar events) for each of 20 consecutive trading days, the dividend rate (excluding any applicable adjustments as a result of a default) will become 0.00%. However, this does not preclude the payment of default dividends after the 30-month anniversary of the Closing Date. We expect the dividend for each quarter of fiscal 2010 to be paid in-kind as a result of certain restrictions on our Amended Credit Agreement and ABL Facility and have, therefore, accrued a pro rata 12% rate per annum. See Note 10—Debt and Note Payable for more information on our Amended Credit Agreement and ABL Facility.

Convertibility and Anti-Dilution Adjustments. To the extent that we have authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock, holders of Preferred Shares will have the right, at any time and from time to time, at their option, to convert any or all of their Preferred Shares, in whole or in part, into fully paid and non-assessable shares of our Common Stock at the conversion price set forth in the Certificate of Designations. The number of shares of Common Stock into which a Preferred Share is convertible is determined by dividing the sum of the liquidation preference of $1,000 per Preferred Share and the accrued and unpaid dividends of such share as of the time of conversion by the conversion price in effect at the time of conversion.

The initial conversion price of the Convertible Preferred Stock is equal to $1.2748 (or $6.3740 as adjusted for the Reverse Stock Split) and is subject to adjustment as set forth in the Certificate of Designations. The conversion price is subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments, including stock dividends, splits, combinations or similar events and issuance of our Common Stock at a price below the then-current market price and, within the first three years after the Closing Date, issuances of our Common Stock below the then applicable conversion price.

Milestone Redemption Right. The Company has the right, at any time on or after the tenth anniversary of the Closing Date, to redeem in whole, but not in part, all then-issued and outstanding shares of Convertible Preferred Stock in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Certificate of Designations. Any holder of Convertible Preferred Stock has the right, at any time on or after the tenth anniversary of the Closing Date, to require that the Company redeem all, but not less than all, of its shares of Convertible Preferred Stock in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Certificate of Designations. In each case, such right (the “Milestone Redemption Right”), is exercisable at a redemption price for each Preferred Share equal to the sum of the liquidation preference of $1,000 per Preferred Share and the accrued and unpaid dividends of such share as of the time of redemption.

Change of Control Redemption Right. Upon certain change of control events specified in the Certificate of Designations, including certain business combinations involving the Company and certain changes to the beneficial ownership of the voting power of the Company, so long as the CD&R Funds do not own 45% or more of the voting power of the Company and directors designated by the CD&R Funds are not entitled to cast a majority of the total number of votes that can be cast by the Company’s board of directors or by the directors constituting the quorum approving or recommending such change of control event, holders of Preferred Shares are able to require redemption by the Company, in whole but not in part, of the Convertible Preferred Stock (1) if redeemed after the fourth anniversary of the Closing Date, at a purchase price equal to the sum of the liquidation value of such Preferred Shares and the accrued and unpaid dividends thereon as of the redemption date or (2) if redeemed prior to the fourth anniversary of the Closing Date, at a purchase price equal to the sum of (a) the liquidation value of such Preferred Shares plus the accrued and unpaid dividends thereon as of the redemption date and (b) a make-whole premium equal to the net present value of the sum of all dividends that would otherwise be payable on and after the redemption date, to and including such fourth anniversary date, assuming that such dividends are paid in cash. In addition, upon changes of control events pursuant to the Amended Credit Agreement or the ABL Facility, holders of Preferred Shares are able to require redemption by the Company, in whole but not in part, of the Convertible Preferred Stock, at a purchase price equal to 101% of the sum of the liquidation value of such Preferred Shares and the accrued and unpaid dividends thereon as of the redemption date.

In the event of a merger or other business combination resulting in a change of control in which the holders of shares of our Common Stock receive cash or securities of an unaffiliated entity as consideration for such shares, if the holder of Preferred Shares does not exercise the change of control redemption right described in the paragraph above or is not entitled to the change of control redemption

right in connection with such event, such holder will be entitled to receive, pursuant to such merger or business combination, the consideration such holder would have received for its Preferred Shares had it converted such shares immediately prior to the merger or business combination transaction. In the event of a merger or other business combination not resulting in a change of control in which the holders of shares of our Common Stock receive cash or securities of an unaffiliated entity as consideration for such shares, holders of Convertible Preferred Stock shall have the option to exchange their Preferred Shares for shares of the surviving entity’s capital stock having terms, preferences, rights, privileges and powers no less favorable than the terms, preferences, rights, privileges and powers under the Certificate of Designations.

Vote. Holders of Preferred Shares generally are entitled to vote with the holders of the shares of our Common Stock on all matters submitted for a vote of holders of shares of our Common Stock (voting together with the holders of shares of our Common Stock as one class) and are entitled to a number of votes equal to the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of such holder’s Preferred Shares (without any limitations based on our authorized but unissued shares of our Common Stock) as of the applicable record date for the determination of stockholders entitled to vote on such matters.

Certain matters require the approval of the holders of a majority of the outstanding Preferred Shares, voting as a separate class, including (1) amendments or modifications to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, by-laws or the Certificate of Designations, that would adversely affect the terms or the powers, preferences, rights or privileges of the Convertible Preferred Stock, (2) authorization, creation, increase in the authorized amount of, or issuance of any class or series of senior securities or any security convertible into, or exchangeable or exercisable for, shares of senior securities and (3) any increase or decrease in the authorized number of Preferred Shares or the issuance of additional Preferred Shares, subject to certain exceptions.

In addition, in the event that the Company fails to fulfill its obligations to redeem the Convertible Preferred Stock in accordance with the terms of the Certificate of Designations following the exercise of the Milestone Redemption Right or change of control redemption rights described above, until such failure is remedied, certain additional actions of the Company shall require the approval of the holders of a majority of the outstanding Preferred Shares, voting as a separate class, including the adoption of an annual budget, the hiring and firing, or the changing of the compensation, of executive officers and the commitment, resolution or agreement to effect any business combination

Restriction on Dividends on Junior Securities. The Company is prohibited from (i) paying any dividend with respect to our Common Stock or other junior securities, except for ordinary cash dividends in which the Convertible Preferred Stock participates and which are declared, paid or set aside after the base dividend rate for the Convertible Preferred Stock has been reduced to 0.00% as described above and dividends payable solely in shares of our Common Stock or other junior securities, or (ii) repurchasing or redeeming any shares of our Common Stock or other junior securities, unless, in each case, we have sufficient access to lawful funds immediately following such action such that we would be legally permitted to redeem in full all Preferred Shares then outstanding.

Accounting for Convertible Preferred Stock

In accordance with guidance that has been codified under ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and ASC Topic 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, we classified the Convertible Preferred Stock as mezzanine equity because the Convertible Preferred Stock (1) can be settled in cash or shares of our Common Stock, (2) contains change of control rights allowing for early redemption, and (3) contains Milestone Redemption Rights which allow the Convertible Preferred Stock to remain outstanding without a stated maturity date.

In addition, the Certificate of Designations, which is the underlying contract of the Convertible Preferred Stock, includes features that are required to be bifurcated and recorded at fair value. We classified the Convertible Preferred Stock as an equity host contract because of (1) the voting rights, (2) the participating dividends on Common Stock and mandatory, cumulative preferred stock dividends, and (3) the Milestone Redemption Right which allows the Convertible Preferred Stock to remain outstanding without a stated maturity date. We then determined that the conditions resulting in the application of the default dividend rate are not clearly and closely related to this equity host contract and we bifurcated and separately recorded these features at fair value. See Note 12—Derivative Instruments and Hedging Strategy.

The Convertible Preferred Stock, at execution, was recorded with a book value of $221.6 million which is the $250.0 million initial liquidation preference less $27.7 million of direct transaction costs and $0.6 million for the fair value, net of income tax, of the bifurcated embedded derivative liability related to the dividend default rate. The $28.4 million difference between the book value and the initial liquidation preference is accreted using the effective interest rate method from the execution of the contract to the Milestone Redemption Right date or 10 years. The accretion recorded during the three months ended January 31, 2010 is $0.7 million.

Because the dividends accrue and accumulate on a daily basis and the amount payable upon redemption of the Convertible Preferred Stock is the liquidation preference plus accrued and unpaid dividends, accrued dividends are recorded into Convertible Preferred

Stock. Dividends are accrued at the 12% rate and increased the Convertible Preferred Stock by $7.5 million during the three months ended January 31, 2010. As such, as of January 31, 2010, the book value of our Convertible Preferred Stock was $230.9 million.

In accordance with guidance that has been codified under ASC Subtopic 470-20, Debt with Conversion and Other Options, the Convertible Preferred Stock contains a beneficial conversion feature because it was issued with an initial conversion price of $1.2748 per Common Share equivalent (or $6.3740 as adjusted for the Reverse Stock Split) and the closing stock price per share of Common Stock just prior to the execution of the CD&R Equity Investment was $12.55. The intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature cannot exceed the issuance proceeds of the Convertible Preferred Stock less the cash paid to the CD&R Funds, and thus is $241.4 million. At January 31, 2010, 1.8 million of the potentially 40.6 million shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of the Convertible Preferred Shares were authorized and unissued. Therefore, an additional $0.2 million of the beneficial conversion feature was recognized in the first three months of fiscal 2010. The remaining $230.7 million of the beneficial conversion feature will be recognized in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 when the contingency related to the availability of authorized shares was resolved by both stockholder approval of the Reverse Stock Split and the subsequent action by the Board to effect the Reverse Stock Split. We expect to recognize additional beneficial conversion features upon the payment of paid-in-kind dividends.

As of January 31, 2010 and November 1, 2009, the Preferred Shares were contingently convertible into 40.6 million and 39.2 million shares of Common Stock, respectively, at an initial conversion price of $1.2748 (or $6.3740 as adjusted for the Reverse Stock Split). However, as of January 31, 2010, only approximately 1.8 million shares of Common Stock were authorized and unissued, and therefore the CD&R Funds were not able to fully convert the Preferred Shares. To the extent that the CD&R Funds had opted to convert their Preferred Shares, as of January 31, 2010, their conversion right was limited to conversion of that portion of their Preferred Shares into the approximately 1.8 million shares of Common Stock that were currently authorized and unissued. On March 5, 2010, we effected a Reverse Stock Split of our Common Stock at an exchange ratio of 1-for-5. As of that date, the Preferred Shares held by the CD&R Funds were fully convertible into 40.6 million Common Shares and therefore, the contingency is resolved in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 and the remaining beneficial conversion feature will be recognized in the second quarter of fiscal 2010.

NOTE 12 — DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING STRATEGY

Interest Rate Risk

We are exposed to interest rate risk associated with fluctuations in the interest rates on our variable interest rate debt. In order to manage this risk, on June 15, 2006, we entered into a forward interest rate swap agreement (“Swap Agreement”) hedging a portion of our then $400 million Credit Agreement with a notional amount of $65 million on January 31, 2010 and November 1, 2009. The term of the Swap Agreement expires on June 17, 2010. At inception, we designated the Swap Agreement as a cash flow hedge. The fair value of the Swap Agreement as of January 31, 2010 and November 1, 2009, was a liability of approximately $1.3 million and $2.2 million, respectively, and is included in other accrued expenses in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The fair value of the Swap Agreement excludes accrued interest and takes into consideration current interest rates and current creditworthiness of us or the counterparty, as applicable.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, in connection with our refinancing and Amended Credit Agreement, we modified the terms of our credit agreement to include a 2% LIBOR minimum market interest rate. Based on the current expected LIBOR rates over the remaining term of the Swap Agreement, the forecasted market rate interest payments have been effectively converted to fixed rate interest payments making the Swap Agreement both ineffective and the underlying hedged cash flow no longer probable. Therefore, during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, we reclassified to interest expense the remaining $3.1 million of deferred losses recorded to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and all subsequent changes in fair market value will be recorded directly to earnings. During the three months ended January 31, 2010, we have reduced interest expense by $1.0 million as a result of the changes in fair value of the hedge.

Embedded Derivative Bifurcated From Convertible Preferred Stock (See Note 11)

The terms of the Convertible Preferred Stock include a default dividend rate of 3% per annum if, with certain exceptions, we fail to (1) pay holders of Convertible Preferred Stock, in cash on an as-converted basis, dividends paid on shares of our Common Stock; (2) following the date that there are no Convertible Notes outstanding, pay, in cash or in kind, any dividend (other than dividends payable pursuant to the preceding clause (1)) payable to holders of Preferred Shares pursuant to the Certificate of Designations, on the applicable quarterly dividend payment date; (3) after June 30, 2010, reserve and keep available for issuance the number of shares of our Common Stock equal to 110% of the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon conversion of all outstanding shares of Convertible Preferred Stock; (4) maintain the listing of our Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange or another U.S. national securities exchange; (5) comply with our obligations to convert the Convertible Preferred Stock in accordance with our obligations under the Certificate of Designations; (6) redeem the Convertible Preferred Stock in compliance with the Certificate of Designations;

or (7) comply with any dividend payment restrictions with respect to junior securities dividends. If, at a time when a 3% per annum default dividend rate is in effect after June 30, 2011, we fail to reserve and keep available authorized common shares pursuant to the terms of the Certificate of Designations the default dividend rate shall increase to 6% until such default is no longer continuing. The default dividend represents an embedded derivative which is bifurcated from the CD&R Equity Investment host contract (i.e., the Certificate of Designations). See Note 11—Series B Cumulative Convertible Participating Preferred Stock for further discussion of the Convertible Preferred Stock.

To determine the Level 3 fair value of the embedded derivative, we used a probability-weighted discounted cash flow model and assigned probabilities for each qualified default event. At November 1, 2009, we recorded the fair value of the embedded derivative of $1.0 million in other accrued liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The majority of the value of the derivative was derived from the default dividend rate. As discussed further in Note 11, on December 14, 2009, the CD&R Funds, our majority equity holders expressed their intention to vote in favor of the proposed Reverse Stock Split. Based upon these events we have reevaluated the assigned probabilities used previously in the probability-weighted discounted cash flow model. As a result, we have recorded a $0.9 million decrease in fair value of the embedded derivative which is recorded in other income and expense during the period.

As disclosed in Note 18, on March 5, 2010, the Company effected the Reverse Stock Split at an exchange ratio of 1-for-5. The Reverse Stock Split was approved by our stockholders at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders on February 19, 2010, and the exchange ratio was approved by the board of directors on the same day, subsequent to the stockholders’ meeting.

At January 31, 2010 and November 1, 2009, the fair value carrying amount of our derivative instruments were recorded as follows (in thousands):

		Liability Derivatives
						January 31, 2010				November 1, 2009
		Balance Sheet Location				Fair Value				Fair Value
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815:
Interest rate contract		Other accrued expenses				$	1,257			$	2,208
Embedded derivative		Other accrued expenses					122				1,041
Total derivatives						$	1,379			$	3,249

The effect of derivative instruments on the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three months ended January 31, 2010 and February 1, 2009 was as follows (in thousands):

		Amount of Loss Recognized
		in OCI on Derivative
		(Effective Portion)
		January 31,				February 1,
Derivative in ASC 815 Cash Flow Hedging Relationship		2010				2009
Interest rate contract		$	—			$	(554	)

		Amount of Income Recognized
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging		in Income (Loss) on Derivatives								Location of Income Recognized in Income
Instruments Under ASC 815		January 31, 2010				February 1, 2009				(Loss) on Derivatives
Interest rate contract		$	951			$	—			Interest expense
Embedded derivative		$	919			$	—			Other income, net

NOTE 13 — FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value as of January 31, 2010 and November 1, 2009 because of the relatively short maturity of these instruments. The fair values of the remaining financial instruments not currently recognized at fair value on our consolidated balance sheets at the respective fiscal period ends were:

		January 31, 2010								November 1, 2009
		Carrying								Carrying
		Amount				Fair Value				Amount				Fair Value
		(in thousands)								(in thousands)
2.125% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes		$	—			$	—			$	59			$	97
Amended Credit Agreement		$	150,000			$	147,375			$	150,000			$	138,000

The fair value of the Convertible Notes was determined from the market rates on the redemption date prior to our fiscal period end. The fair value of the Amended Credit Agreement was based on recent trading activities of comparable market instruments.

Fair Value Measurements

Effective November 3, 2008, we adopted the guidance that has been codified under ASC 820-10 related to assets and liabilities recognized or disclosed in the financial statements at fair value on a recurring basis. We adopted the additional guidance in ASC 820-10 on November 2, 2009 for nonrecurring, non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value. ASC 820-10 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820-10 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, but does not require any new fair value measurements. The adoption of these provisions did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

ASC 820-10 clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants based on the highest and best use of the asset or liability. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. ASC 820-10 requires us to use valuation techniques to measure fair value that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. These inputs are prioritized as follows:

     Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

     Level 2: Other inputs that are observable directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities or market-corroborated inputs.

     Level 3: Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data and which require us to develop our own assumptions about how market participants would price the assets or liabilities.

The following table summarizes information regarding our financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value as of January 31, 2010 (in thousands):

		Level 1				Level 2				Level 3				Total
Assets:
Short-term investments in deferred compensation plan(1)		$	3,529			$	—			$	—			$	3,529
Assets held for sale			—				3,930				—				3,930
Total assets		$	3,529			$	3,930			$	—			$	7,459
Liabilities:
Deferred compensation plan liability		$	(3,642	)		$	—			$	—			$	(3,642	)
Interest rate contract			—				(1,257	)			—				(1,257	)
Embedded derivative			—				—				(122	)			(122	)
Total liabilities		$	(3,642	)		$	(1,257	)		$	(122	)		$	(5,021	)

The following table summarizes the activity in Level 3 financial instruments during the three months ended January 31, 2010:

		January 31,
		2010
Beginning balance		$	(1,041	)
Realized gains (losses) (1)			919
Ending balance		$	(122	)

NOTE 14 — INCOME TAXES

The reconciliation of income tax computed at the statutory tax rate to the effective income tax rate is as follows:

		Fiscal Three Months Ended
		January 31, 2010				February 1, 2009
Statutory federal income tax rate			35.0	%			35.0	%
State income taxes			3.4	%			3.4	%
Production activities deduction			—				—
Non-deductible goodwill impairment			—				(32.2	)%
Canada valuation allowance			—				(0.1	)%
Non-deductible expenses			(2.2	)%			—
Other			(0.6	)%			0.1	%
Effective tax rate			35.6	%			6.2	%

The increase in our effective tax rate for the three months ended January 31, 2010 as compared to the prior year period was primarily due to the $508.9 million goodwill impairment charge in the three months ended February 1, 2009.

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefit at both January 31, 2010 and November 1, 2009 was $0.7 million, of which $0.7 million would impact our effective tax rate if recognized. We do not anticipate any material change in the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits to occur within the next twelve months.

NOTE 15 — COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

Comprehensive loss consists of the following (in thousands):

		Fiscal Three Months Ended
		January 31, 2010				February 1, 2009
Net loss		$	(10,486	)		$	(529,981	)
Foreign exchange translation gain (loss) and other, net of tax			197				7
Gain (loss) in fair value of interest rate swap, net of tax			—				(554	)
Comprehensive loss		$	(10,289	)		$	(530,528	)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss consists of the following (in thousands):

		January 31, 2010				November 1, 2009
Foreign exchange translation adjustments		$	588			$	391
Defined benefit pension plan			(9,250	)			(9,250	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		$	(8,662	)		$	(8,859	)

A summary of the components of other comprehensive income (loss) and the related tax effects for each of the periods presented is as follows:

		Fiscal Three Months Ended January 31, 2010												Fiscal Three Months Ended February 1, 2009
		Before-Tax				Tax (Expense)				Net-of-Tax				Before-Tax				Tax (Expense)				Net-of-Tax
		Amount				or Benefit				Amount				Amount				or Benefit				Amount
Foreign exchange translation gain (loss) and other		$	194			$	3			$	197			$	11			$	(4	)		$	7
Loss in fair value of interest rate swap			—				—				—				(899	)			345				(554	)
Other Comprehensive income (loss)		$	194			$	3			$	197			$	(888	)		$	341			$	(547	)

NOTE 16 — BUSINESS SEGMENTS

We have aggregated our operations into three reportable segments based upon similarities in product lines, manufacturing processes, marketing and management of our businesses: metal coil coating; metal components; and engineered building systems. All business segments operate primarily in the nonresidential construction market. Sales and earnings are influenced by general economic conditions, the level of nonresidential construction activity, metal roof repair and retrofit demand and the availability and terms of financing available for construction. Products of our business segments use similar basic raw materials. The metal coil coating segment consists of cleaning, treating, painting and slitting continuous steel coils before the steel is fabricated for use by construction and industrial users. The metal components segment products include metal roof and wall panels, doors, metal partitions, metal trim and other related accessories. The engineered building systems segment includes the manufacturing of main frames, Long Bay^® Systems and value added engineering and drafting, which are typically not part of metal components or metal coil coating products or services. The reporting segments follow the same accounting policies used for our consolidated financial statements.

We evaluate a segment’s performance based primarily upon operating income before corporate expenses. Intersegment sales are recorded based on standard material costs plus a standard markup to cover labor and overhead and consist of: (i) hot-rolled, light gauge painted and slit material and other services provided by the metal coil coating segment to both the engineered building systems and metal components segments; (ii) building components provided by the metal components segment to the engineered building systems segment; and (iii) structural framing provided by the engineered building systems segment to the metal components segment.

Corporate assets consist primarily of cash but also include deferred financing costs, deferred taxes and property, plant and equipment associated with our headquarters in Houston, Texas. These items (and income and expenses related to these items) are not allocated to the segments.

The following table represents sales, operating income and total assets attributable to these business segments for the periods indicated (in thousands):

		Fiscal Three Months Ended
		January 31, 2010				February 1, 2009
Total sales:
Metal coil coating		$	39,031			$	41,501
Metal components			86,806				121,480
Engineered building systems			102,618				152,409
Intersegment sales			(45,568	)			(55,026	)
Total sales		$	182,887			$	260,364
External sales:
Metal coil coating		$	12,808			$	11,424
Metal components			70,138				101,042
Engineered building systems			99,941				147,898
Total sales		$	182,887			$	260,364
Operating income (loss):
Metal coil coating		$	3,119			$	(63,760	)
Metal components			1,791				(128,607	)
Engineered building systems			(5,829	)			(352,283	)
Corporate			(11,824	)			(13,252	)
Total operating loss		$	(12,743	)		$	(557,902	)
Unallocated other expense			(3,522	)			(6,940	)
Loss before income taxes		$	(16,265	)		$	(564,842	)

		Fiscal Three Months Ended
		January 31, 2010				November 1, 2009
Total assets:
Metal coil coating		$	59,033			$	57,254
Metal components			163,864				160,123
Engineered building systems			230,276				241,396
Corporate			131,740				155,745
Total assets		$	584,913			$	614,518

NOTE 17 — CONTINGENCIES

From time to time, we are involved in various legal proceedings and contingencies considered to be in the ordinary course of business. While we are not able to predict whether we will incur any liability in excess of insurance coverages or to accurately estimate the damages, or the range of damages, if any, we might incur in connection with these legal proceedings, we believe these legal proceedings and claims will not have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial position or results of operations.

NOTE 18 — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On March 5, 2010, the Company effected the Reverse Stock Split at an exchange ratio of 1-for-5. The Reverse Stock Split was approved by our stockholders at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders on February 19, 2010, and the exchange ratio was approved by our board of directors on the same day, subsequent to the stockholders’ meeting. At the Effective Time, all shares of Common Stock other than fractional shares were reclassified and combined, automatically and without further action on the stockholders’ part, into 18.1 million shares of Common Stock. Stockholders who otherwise held fractional shares as a result of the reverse stock split were entitled to receive cash (without interest) in lieu of such fractional shares from our transfer agent equal to the proceeds attributable to the sale of such fractional shares following the aggregation and sale by our transfer agent of all fractional shares otherwise issuable.

On February 19, 2010, the stockholders also approved an amendment and restatement of the Company’s Incentive Plan. The amendment and restatement of the Incentive Plan increased the number of shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance under the Incentive Plan by 5,668,000 shares of Common Stock to a total of 6,400,000 Common Shares, increased the maximum number of shares that may be granted to an individual in any fiscal year to 900,000 and extended the effective date of the Incentive Plan to 10 years after the date the Compensation Committee of the Company’s board of directors approved the amendments.

NCI BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC.

Item 2.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following information should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements included herein under “Item 1. Financial Statements” and the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 1, 2009.

OVERVIEW

NCI Building Systems, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, unless the context requires otherwise, the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our”) is one of North America’s largest integrated manufacturers and marketers of metal products for the nonresidential construction industry. We provide metal coil coating services and design, engineer, manufacture and market metal components and engineered building systems primarily for nonresidential construction use. We manufacture and distribute extensive lines of metal products for the nonresidential construction market under multiple brand names through a nationwide network of plants and distribution centers. We sell our products for both new construction and repair and retrofit applications.

Metal components offer builders, designers, architects and end-users several advantages, including lower long-term costs, longer life, attractive aesthetics and design flexibility. Similarly, engineered building systems offer a number of advantages over traditional construction alternatives, including shorter construction time, more efficient use of materials, lower construction costs, greater ease of expansion and lower maintenance costs.

We assess performance across our business segments by analyzing and evaluating (i) gross profit, operating income and whether or not each segment has achieved its projected sales goals, and (ii) non-financial efficiency indicators such as gross profit per employee,

man hours per ton of steel produced and shipped tons per day. In assessing our overall financial performance, we regard return on adjusted operating assets, as well as growth in earnings, as key indicators of shareholder value.

First Fiscal Quarter

Both our metal coil coating and metal components segments, which usually respond more quickly to changes in the market, produced operating profits during the current fiscal quarter. The metal coil coating segment processed higher volume than in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 when there was significant destocking affecting sales. The metal components segment maintained operating profitability in the face of lower volume and pricing, benefiting from operating efficiencies, growing opportunities in retro-fit projects and the ramp up of our new insulated panel facility.

Our engineered building systems segment generated an operating loss for the current fiscal quarter, driven largely by the completion of orders booked during the last few months of fiscal 2009. The profitability on these bookings reflected both the difficult external market environment as well as aggressive marketing by the engineered building systems segment to maintain market share despite customer concerns over the completion of our recapitalization. With the completion of our recapitalization, there has been a slight increase in quoting activity and additional opportunities with Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) green building certification system projects, but pricing remains competitive.

On March 5, 2010, the Company effected a reverse stock split in which each five shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 (the “Common Stock” and shares thereof, the “Common Shares”) was reclassified and combined into one share of Common Stock (the “Reverse Stock Split”).

Industry Conditions

Our sales and earnings are influenced by general economic conditions, interest rates, the price of steel relative to other building materials, the level of nonresidential construction activity, roof repair and retrofit demand and the availability and cost of financing for construction projects.

One of the primary challenges we face both short and long term is the volatility in the price of steel. Our business is heavily dependent on the price and supply of steel. For the fiscal three months ended January 31, 2010, steel represented approximately 66% of our cost of goods sold. The steel industry is highly cyclical in nature, and steel prices have been volatile in recent years and may remain volatile in the future. Steel prices are influenced by numerous factors beyond our control, including general economic conditions domestically and internationally, competition, labor costs, production costs, import duties and other trade restrictions.

The monthly CRU North American Steel Price Index, published by the CRU Group, has decreased 0.5% from October 2009 to January 2010 and was 2.4% lower in January 2010 compared to January 2009. Steel prices increased rapidly and steeply during the first half of calendar 2008, and then began a rapid and precipitous decline in the fall of calendar 2008. In fiscal 2009, steel prices continued their decline at a precipitous rate until July 2009 when steel prices began to increase. This unusual level of volatility has negatively impacted our business. First, in the first two quarters of fiscal 2009, we recorded a $40.0 million charge to cost of sales to adjust certain raw material inventory to the lower of cost or market because this inventory exceeded our current estimates of net realizable value less normal profit margins. Our sales volume was significantly lower than previously anticipated while raw material prices had declined more rapidly than anticipated. Second, some customers have delayed projects, waiting to see where steel prices will bottom out. For additional discussion of steel prices, see “Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”

In assessing the state of the metal construction market, we rely upon various industry associations, third-party research, and various government reports such as industrial production and capacity utilization. One such industry association is the Metal Building Manufacturers Association (“MBMA”), which provides summary member sales information and promotes the design and construction of metal buildings and metal roofing systems. Another is McGraw-Hill Construction Information Group, which we look to for reports of actual and forecasted growth in various construction related industries, including the overall nonresidential construction market. McGraw-Hill Construction’s nonresidential construction forecast for calendar 2010, published in January 2010, indicates an expected reduction of 5% in square footage and a decrease of 1% in dollar value as compared to the prior calendar year. In 2011, the forecast is expected to increase, with an increase of 14% in dollar value in 2011 compared to 2010. Additionally, we review the American Institute of Architects’ (“AIA”) survey for inquiry and billing activity for the industrial, commercial and institutional sectors. AIA’s Architectural Billing Index published for January 2010 indicated that inquiry and billings levels remain negative compared to October 2009.

The overall decline in economic conditions beginning in the third quarter of 2008 has reduced demand for our products and adversely affected our business. In addition, the tightening of credit in financial markets over the same period has adversely affected the ability of our customers to obtain financing for construction projects. As a result, we have experienced decreases in and cancellations of orders for our products, and the ability of our customers to make payments has been adversely affected. Similar factors could cause our suppliers to experience financial distress or bankruptcy, resulting in temporary raw material shortages. The lack of credit also adversely affects nonresidential construction, which is the focus of our business.

As a result of the market downturn, we implemented a three phase process to resize and realign our manufacturing operations. The purpose of these closures was to rationalize our least efficient facilities and to retool certain of these facilities to allow us to better utilize our assets and expand into new markets or better provide products to our customers, such as insulated panel systems. As a result of the implementation of this three phase restructuring plan, we expect to realize an annualized fixed cost savings in the amount of approximately $120 million. We have incurred facility closure costs of $17.2 million related to the three phase restructuring plan and expect to incur additional facility closure costs of $1.1 million in fiscal 2010.

We do not have any long-term contracts for the purchase of steel and normally do not maintain an inventory of steel in excess of our current production requirements. However, from time to time, we may purchase steel in advance of announced steel price increases. We can give no assurance that steel will remain available or that prices will not continue to be volatile. While most of our contracts have escalation clauses that allow us, under certain circumstances, to pass along all or a portion of increases in the price of steel after the date of the contract but prior to delivery, we may, for competitive or other reasons, not be able to pass such price increases along. If the available supply of steel declines, we could experience price increases that we are not able to pass on to the end users, a deterioration of service from our suppliers or interruptions or delays that may cause us not to meet delivery schedules to our customers. Any of these problems could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. For additional discussion please see “—Liquidity and Capital Resources —Steel Prices” and “Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk —Steel Prices.”

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

As further discussed in the notes to our consolidated financial statements, our Consolidated Financial Statements for the three months ended February 1, 2009 have been adjusted for the retrospective application of ASC 470-20, Debt with Conversion and Other Options (“ASC 470-20”).

We have aggregated our operations into three reportable segments based upon similarities in product lines, manufacturing processes, marketing and management of our businesses: metal coil coating; metal components; and engineered building systems. All business segments operate primarily in the nonresidential construction market. Sales and earnings are influenced by general economic conditions, the level of nonresidential construction activity, metal roof repair and retrofit demand and the availability and terms of financing available for construction.

Products of all business segments use similar basic raw materials. The metal coil coating segment consists of cleaning, treating, painting and slitting continuous steel coils before the steel is fabricated for use by construction and industrial users. The metal components segment products include metal roof and wall panels, doors, metal partitions, metal trim and other related accessories. The engineered building systems segment includes the manufacturing of main frames, Long Bay^® Systems and value added engineering and drafting, which are typically not part of metal components or metal coil coating products or services. The reporting segments follow the same accounting policies used for our Consolidated Financial Statements.

We evaluate a segment’s performance based primarily upon operating income before corporate expenses. Intersegment sales are recorded based on standard material costs plus a standard markup to cover labor and overhead and consist of: (i) hot-rolled, light gauge painted, and slit material and other services provided by the metal coil coating segment to both the metal components and engineered building systems segments; (ii) building components provided by the metal components segment to the engineered building systems segment; and (iii) structural framing provided by the engineered building systems segment to the metal components segment. Segment information is included in Note 16 of our Consolidated Financial Statements.

The following table represents sales and operating income attributable to these business segments for the periods indicated (in thousands, except percentages):

		Fiscal Three Months Ended
		January 31, 2010								February 1, 2009
						%								%
Sales:
Metal coil coating		$	39,031				21			$	41,501				16
Metal components			86,806				48				121,480				47
Engineered building systems			102,618				56				152,409				58
Intersegment sales			(45,568	)			(25	)			(55,026	)			(21	)
Total sales		$	182,887				100			$	260,364				100
Operating income (loss):
Metal coil coating		$	3,119							$	(63,760	)
Metal components			1,791								(128,607	)