UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

Form 10-Q

Commission File Number: 1-1063

Dana Holding Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		26-1531856
(State of incorporation)		(IRS Employer Identification Number)
3939 Technology Drive, Maumee, OH		43537
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (419) 887-3000

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer þ		Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY
PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes þ No o

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class		Outstanding at July 19, 2010
Common stock, $0.01 par value		140,445,750

 

 

DANA HOLDING CORPORATION – FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2010

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		10-Q Pages
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1 Financial Statements			3
Consolidated Statement of Operations (Unaudited)			3
Consolidated Balance Sheet (Unaudited)			4
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)			5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)			7
Item 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			25
Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk			39
Item 4 Controls and Procedures			41
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1 Legal Proceedings			42
Item 1A Risk Factors			42
Item 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			42
Item 6 Exhibits			42
Signatures
Exhibit Index

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Dana Holding Corporation
Consolidated Statement of Operations (Unaudited)
(In millions except per share amounts)

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		June 30,								June 30,
		2010				2009				2010				2009
Net sales		$	1,526			$	1,190			$	3,034			$	2,406
Costs and expenses
Cost of sales			1,357				1,123				2,725				2,351
Selling, general and administrative expenses			91				64				193				144
Amortization of intangibles			16				18				31				35
Restructuring charges, net			31				29				50				79
Impairment of long-lived assets							6								6
Other income (expense), net			12				61				(1	)			90
Income (loss) before interest, reorganization items and income taxes			43				11				34				(119	)
Interest expense			20				37				46				72
Reorganization items							(3	)							(2	)
Income (loss) before income taxes			23				(23	)			(12	)			(189	)
Income tax benefit (expense)			(17	)			21				(14	)			30
Equity in earnings of affiliates			4				(1	)			6				(4	)
Net income (loss)			10				(3	)			(20	)			(163	)
Less: Noncontrolling interests net income (loss)			1				(3	)			2				(6	)
Net income (loss) attributable to the parent company			9				—				(22	)			(157	)
Preferred stock dividend requirements			8				8				16				16
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders		$	1			$	(8	)		$	(38	)		$	(173	)
Net income (loss) per share available to parent company stockholders:
Basic		$	—			$	(0.08	)		$	(0.28	)		$	(1.72	)
Diluted		$	—			$	(0.08	)		$	(0.28	)		$	(1.72	)
Average common shares outstanding
Basic			140				100				140				100
Diluted			146				100				140				100

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Dana Holding Corporation
Consolidated Balance Sheet (Unaudited)
(In millions except share and per share amounts)

		June 30,				December 31,
		2010				2009
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents		$	1,059			$	947
Accounts receivable
Trade, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $11 in 2010 and $18 in 2009			860				728
Other			186				141
Inventories
Raw materials			284				300
Work in process and finished goods			331				308
Other current assets			94				59
Current assets held for sale			7				99
Total current assets			2,821				2,582
Goodwill			95				111
Intangibles			378				438
Investments and other assets			229				233
Investments in affiliates			114				112
Property, plant and equipment, net			1,315				1,484
Noncurrent assets held for sale			2				104
Total assets		$	4,954			$	5,064
Liabilities and equity
Current liabilities
Notes payable, including current portion of long-term debt		$	48			$	34
Accounts payable			767				601
Accrued payroll and employee benefits			120				103
Accrued restructuring costs			39				29
Taxes on income			29				40
Other accrued liabilities			288				270
Current liabilities held for sale			3				79
Total current liabilities			1,294				1,156
Long-term debt			891				969
Deferred employee benefits and other noncurrent liabilities			1,100				1,160
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
Total liabilities			3,285				3,285
Parent company stockholders’ equity
Preferred stock, 50,000,000 shares authorized
Series A, $0.01 par value, 2,500,000 issued and outstanding			242				242
Series B, $0.01 par value, 5,400,000 issued and outstanding			529				529
Common stock, $.01 par value, 450,000,000 shares authorized, 140,441,226 issued and outstanding			1				1
Additional paid-in capital			2,588				2,580
Accumulated deficit			(1,207	)			(1,169	)
Treasury stock, at cost			(1	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss			(581	)			(504	)
Total parent company stockholders’ equity			1,571				1,679
Noncontrolling interests			98				100
Total equity			1,669				1,779
Total liabilities and equity		$	4,954			$	5,064

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Dana Holding Corporation
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
(In millions)

		Six Months Ended
		June 30,
		2010				2009
Cash flows — operating activities
Net loss		$	(20	)		$	(163	)
Depreciation			123				152
Amortization of intangibles			38				42
Amortization of deferred financing charges and original issue discount			13				18
Loss on sale of business			5
Loss (gain) on extinguishment of debt			4				(40	)
Reorganization-related tax claim payment			(75	)
Deferred income taxes			(6	)			(26	)
Pension expense in excess of (less than) contributions			9				(5	)
Change in working capital			33				(35	)
Other, net			(2	)			(20	)
Net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities			122				(77	)
Cash flows — investing activities
Purchases of property, plant and equipment			(26	)			(54	)
Proceeds from sale of businesses			113
Other			5				2
Net cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities			92				(52	)
Cash flows — financing activities
Net change in short-term debt			13				(35	)
Advance received on corporate facility sale							11
Proceeds from long-term debt			1				3
Repayment of long-term debt			(88	)			(82	)
Dividends paid to preferred stockholders			(16	)
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests			(2	)
Other			1				(3	)
Net cash flows used in financing activities			(91	)			(106	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents			123				(235	)
Cash and cash equivalents — beginning of period			947				777
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash balances			(11	)			11
Cash and cash equivalents — end of period		$	1,059			$	553

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Dana Holding Corporation
Index to Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements

1.		Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
2.		Divestitures and Acquisitions
3.		Restructuring of Operations
4.		Goodwill, Other Intangible Assets and Long-lived Assets
5.		Capital Stock
6.		Earnings per Share
7.		Incentive and Stock Compensation
8.		Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans
9.		Comprehensive Income (Loss)
10.		Cash Deposits
11.		Financing Agreements
12.		Fair Value Measurements
13.		Risk Management and Derivatives
14.		Commitments and Contingencies
15.		Warranty Obligations
16.		Income Taxes
17.		Other Income (Expense), Net
18.		Segments
19.		Reorganization Items

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In millions, except share and per share amounts)

Note 1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

General

     Dana Holding Corporation (Dana), incorporated in Delaware in 2007, is headquartered in Maumee, Ohio. We are a leading supplier of driveline products (axles and driveshafts), power technologies (sealing and thermal management products) and genuine service parts for light and heavy vehicle manufacturers. Our people design and manufacture products for every major vehicle producer in the world.

     As a result of Dana Corporation’s emergence from Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (Chapter 11) on January 31, 2008 (the Effective Date), Dana is the successor registrant to Dana Corporation pursuant to Rule 12g-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. On the Effective Date, we implemented the Third Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization of Debtors and Debtors in Possession as modified (the Plan) and adopted fresh start accounting.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of presentation – Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of all subsidiaries where we hold a controlling financial interest. The ownership interests in subsidiaries held by third parties are presented in the consolidated balance sheet within equity, but separate from the parent’s equity, as noncontrolling interests. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Investments in 20 to 50%-owned affiliates, which are not required to be consolidated, are accounted for under the equity method. Equity in earnings of these investments is presented separately in the consolidated statement of operations, net of tax. Investments in less-than-20%-owned companies are included in the financial statements at the cost of our investment. Dividends, royalties and fees from these cost basis affiliates are recorded in income when received.

Segments – In the first quarter of 2010, the reporting of our operating segment results was reorganized in line with changes in our management structure and internal reporting. The Sealing and Thermal segments have been combined to form the Power Technologies segment. Prior period segment results have been conformed to the current year presentation. See Note 18 for segment results.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

     In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued additional guidance regarding new disclosures and clarification of existing disclosures of fair value measurements. This guidance covers significant transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 fair value measurements. In addition, the reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements must include information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements presented separately. The guidance also clarified existing disclosures regarding the level of disaggregation and disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. We adopted the provisions of the standard on January 1, 2010, and it did not impact our consolidated financial statements.

     In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance regarding accounting for transfers of financial assets. The guidance seeks to improve the relevance and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance and cash flows and a transferor’s continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets. The guidance eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity, creates more stringent conditions for reporting a transfer of a portion of a financial asset as a sale, clarifies other sale-accounting criteria and changes the initial measurement of a transferor’s interest in transferred financial assets. The guidance was effective January 1, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not impact our consolidated financial statements.

     In June 2009, the FASB issued additional guidance related to variable interest entities (VIEs) and the determination of whether an entity is a VIE. Companies are required to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprise’s variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a VIE. The guidance requires ongoing assessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE, requires enhanced disclosures and eliminates the scope exclusion for qualifying special-purpose entities. We adopted the guidance on January 1, 2010 and it did not impact our consolidated financial statements.

Note 2. Divestitures and Acquisitions

Acquisitions – In June 2007, our subsidiary Dana Mauritius Limited (Dana Mauritius) purchased 4% of the registered capital of Dongfeng Dana Axle Co., Ltd. (DDAC), a commercial vehicle axle manufacturer in China formerly known as Dongfeng Axle Co., Ltd., from Dongfeng Motor Co., Ltd. (Dongfeng Motor) and certain of its affiliates for $5. Dana Mauritius agreed, subject to certain conditions, to purchase an additional 46% equity interest in DDAC. Based on the discussions among the parties to date, we expect to complete an agreement in 2010 and to increase our investment in DDAC.

Divestiture of Structural Products business – In December 2009, we signed an agreement to sell substantially all of our Structural Products business to Metalsa S.A. de C.V. (Metalsa), the largest vehicle frame and structures supplier in Mexico. As a result of the sale agreement, we had recorded a $161 charge ($153 net of tax) in December 2009, including an impairment of $150 of the intangible and long-lived assets of the Structures segment and transaction and other expenses associated with the sale of $11 which was recorded in other income (expense), net.

     In March 2010, we completed the sale of all but the operations in Venezuela, representing $140 of the $147 total purchase price and recorded a pre-tax loss of $5 ($3 net of tax) resulting primarily from a $3 negotiated reduction of the purchase price. We received cash proceeds of $113 and recorded a receivable of $27 for the deferred proceeds, including $15 related to an earn-out provision, which we expect to receive in the first quarter of 2011. We recorded an additional receivable of $8 representing recovery of working capital, which we expect to receive in the third quarter of 2010, subject to final agreement with the buyer. No significant changes to this receivable are expected based on current discussions.

     The $15 earn-out payment will be realized if the aggregate number of units produced by the divested operations for nine vehicle platforms specified in the agreement exceeds 650,000 during a twelve-month period within the fourteen months ending April 30, 2011. Estimated production for these periods currently ranges from 700,000 to 707,000 units. The earn-out payment decreases if unit production is below 650,000 and would be eliminated if production falls below 610,000. We believe that the realization of this earn-out is reasonably assured and its recognition is consistent with our policy regarding recognition of contingent consideration at fair value.

     In connection with the sale, leases covering three U.S. facilities were assigned to a U.S. affiliate of Metalsa. Under the terms of the sale agreement, Dana will guarantee the affiliate’s performance under the leases, which run through June 2025, including approximately $6 of annual payments. In the event of a required payment by Dana as guarantor, Dana is entitled to pursue full recovery from Metalsa of the amounts paid under the guarantee and to take possession of the leased property.

     The sale of our Structural Products business in Venezuela is expected to be completed in the third quarter of 2010.

     Assets and liabilities related to this transaction are reported as held for sale in our consolidated balance sheet and consisted of the following at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. The amounts at June 30, 2010 represent the Venezuelan operation assets and liabilities to be sold in the third quarter.

		June 30,				December 31,
		2010				2009
Assets
Accounts receivable		$	5			$	62
Inventories			2				34
Other current assets							3
Current assets held for sale		$	7			$	99
Intangibles		$	—			$	16
Investments and other assets							6
Investments in affiliates							17
Property, plant and equipment, net			2				65
Non-current assets held for sale		$	2			$	104
Liabilities
Accounts payable		$	3			$	54
Accrued payroll							7
Other accrued liabilities							18
Current liabilities held for sale		$	3			$	79

     In the consolidated statement of cash flows, we have not segregated the cash flows related to assets and liabilities held for sale.

Other agreements – In August 2007, we executed an agreement relating to our two remaining joint ventures with GETRAG Getriebe-und Zahnradfabrik Hermann Hagenmeyer GmbH & Cie KG (GETRAG). This agreement included the grant of a call option for GETRAG to acquire our interests in these joint ventures for $75 and our payment to GETRAG of $11 under certain conditions. In September 2008, we amended our agreement with GETRAG and reduced the call option purchase price to $60, extended the call option exercise period to September 2009 and eliminated the $11 liability. As a result of the reduced call price, we recorded an asset impairment charge of $15 in the third quarter of 2008 in equity in earnings of affiliates. During the period covered by the options, the call prices effectively capped the carrying value of our investment. As a result, the recognition of positive equity earnings and the corresponding increase in our investment in GETRAG were effectively offset by the recognition of charges to reflect other-than-temporary impairment to the extent of the equity earnings. Concurrent with the expiration of the option in September 2009, the cap was eliminated. We are now recognizing equity in the earnings of GETRAG without an offsetting impairment charge.

Note 3. Restructuring of Operations

     Restructuring of our manufacturing operations was an essential component of our Chapter 11 reorganization plans and remains a primary focus of management. We continue to eliminate excess capacity by closing and consolidating facilities and repositioning operations in lower cost facilities or those with excess capacity and focusing on reducing and realigning overhead costs. Restructuring expense includes costs associated with current and previously announced actions including various workforce reduction programs, manufacturing footprint optimization actions and other restructuring activities across our global businesses. In connection with our restructuring activities, we classify incremental depreciation as restructuring expense when a planned closure triggers accelerated depreciation. This amount is included in accelerated depreciation/impairment in the table below.

     During the first half of 2009, we continued to implement cost reduction activities initially begun in 2008 in response to adverse economic conditions. As part of the continuation of the voluntary separation program begun in the fourth quarter of 2008, we recorded a $10 charge for severance and related benefit costs for approximately 125 salaried employees, predominantly in the U.S. and Canada, during the first quarter of 2009. We also implemented other employee reduction programs and continued our global business realignment activities, including the closures of our Mississauga, Ontario; Calatayud, Spain and McKenzie, Tennessee facilities in our Power Technologies business, as well as our Beamsville, Ontario facility in our Commercial Vehicle business. Including the $10 associated with the voluntary separation program, these actions resulted in a total charge of $63 for severance and related benefit costs and a global headcount reduction from 29,000 at the end of 2008 to 22,000 as of June 30, 2009. Restructuring charges during the first half of 2009 also included $16 of exit costs and accelerated depreciation/impairment costs, including those associated with other previously announced initiatives.

     In the first quarter of 2010, we announced our plans to consolidate our Heavy Vehicle operations which will result in the closing of the Kalamazoo, Michigan and Statesville, North Carolina facilities. Certain costs associated with this consolidation had been accrued in 2009. We also announced the planned closure of the Yennora, Australia facility in our Light Vehicle Driveline (LVD) business and the associated transfer of certain production activity to other global operations during 2010. In the second quarter of 2010, we approved certain additional business realignment and headcount reduction initiatives, primarily in our European and Venezuelan operations. Including costs associated with previously announced initiatives, we expensed $50 for these actions during the first half of 2010, including $34 of severance and related benefit costs, $11 of exit costs and $5 of accelerated depreciation/impairment cost.

Restructuring charges and related payments and adjustments –

		Employee				Accelerated
		Termination				Depreciation/				Exit
		Benefits				Impairment				Costs				Total
Balance at March 31, 2010		$	25			$	—			$	2			$	27
Activity during the period:
Charges to restructuring			26				2				6				34
Adjustments of accruals			(2	)							(1	)			(3	)
Non-cash write-off							(2	)							(2	)
Cash payments			(10	)							(6	)			(16	)
Currency impact			(1	)											(1	)
Balance at June 30, 2010		$	38			$	—			$	1			$	39
Balance at December 31, 2009		$	26			$	—			$	3			$	29
Activity during the period:
Charges to restructuring			38				5				12				55
Adjustments of accruals			(4	)							(1	)			(5	)
Non-cash write-off							(5	)							(5	)
Cash payments			(21	)							(13	)			(34	)
Currency impact			(1	)											(1	)
Balance at June 30, 2010		$	38			$	—			$	1			$	39

     At June 30, 2010, $39 of realignment accruals remained in accrued liabilities, including $38 for the reduction of approximately 1,100 employees to be completed over the next two years and $1 for lease terminations and other exit costs. The estimated cash expenditures related to these liabilities are projected to approximate $25 in 2010 and $14 thereafter.

Cost to complete – The following table provides project-to-date and estimated future expenses for completion of our pending restructuring initiatives for our business segments.

		Expense Recognized												Future
		Prior to				Year-to-date				Total				Cost to
		2010				2010				to Date				Complete
LVD		$	41			$	21			$	62			$	31
Structures			35				1				36				2
Power Technologies			19				5				24				3
Off-Highway			2				4				6				2
Commercial Vehicle			43				12				55				22
Other							7				7
Total		$	140			$	50			$	190			$	60

     The remaining cost to complete includes estimated contractual and noncontractual separation payments, lease continuation costs, equipment transfers and other costs which are required to be recognized as closures are finalized or as incurred during the closure.

Note 4. Goodwill, Other Intangible Assets and Long-lived Assets

     We test the carrying values of goodwill and other non-amortizable assets for impairment annually as of October 31 and more frequently if conditions arise that warrant an interim review. We review property, plant and equipment and amortizable intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets’ carrying amounts may not be recoverable.

Valuations and projections – We utilize various valuation methods for our impairment testing. These valuations are based in part on our cash flow projections for our segments and certain asset groups below the segment level. We use our internal forecasts, which we update monthly, to develop our cash flow projections. These forecasts are based on our knowledge of our customers’ production forecasts, our assessment of market growth rates, net new business, material and labor cost estimates, cost recovery agreements with customers and our estimate of savings expected from our restructuring activities. The most likely factors that would significantly impact our forecasts are changes in customer production levels and loss of significant portions of our business.

     During the second quarter of 2009, the negative impact of declining production expectations on our forecasts triggered impairment assessments of all our long-lived assets. By December 2009, our projected cash flows and earnings had improved as we began to see modest economic recovery and increasing customer demand. Our forecasts have continued to strengthen during the first half of 2010. Consequently, except for the fourth quarter 2009 decision to sell our Structures business, there were no developments that triggered an assessment of long-lived assets during the second half of 2009 or the first half of 2010.

Goodwill – Our goodwill, which is assigned to our Off-Highway operating segment, totaled $95 at June 30, 2010 and $111 at December 31, 2009. The strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to the euro resulted in the $16 decline in the reported goodwill amounts in the first half of 2010.

     In assessing the recoverability of goodwill, estimates of fair value are based upon an average of the net present value of projected future cash flows and multiples of current earnings relative to the multiples of our peers in each segment. Based on our October 31, 2009 impairment analysis and improvement in projections of cash flows and earnings since that analysis, the fair value of the Off-Highway segment remains significantly higher than its carrying value, including goodwill. Accordingly, we do not believe that our goodwill is at risk of being impaired.

Other non-amortizable intangibles – Non-amortizable intangible assets relate to all of our segments except Structures and consist of the Dana ^® and Spicer ^® trademarks and trade names. Non-amortizable intangible asset valuations utilize a relief from royalty method which is based on revenue streams. Our sales forecasts have shown consistent improvement since the second quarter of 2009 when we recorded an impairment of $6. No impairment was recorded during the fourth quarter of 2009 in connection with the required annual assessment. Accordingly, we do not believe that these assets are at risk of being impaired.

Long-lived assets and amortizable intangible assets – Our long-lived assets included property, plant and equipment and amortizable intangibles: core technology, customer relationships and a portion of our trademarks and trade names. Core technology includes the proprietary know-how and expertise that is inherent in our products and manufacturing processes. Customer relationships include the established relationships with our customers and the related ability of these customers to continue to generate future recurring revenue and income.

     When impairment testing of these assets is required, we group the assets and liabilities at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities and evaluate the asset group against the undiscounted future cash flows. Our valuation is based on the cash flow projections discussed above applied over the life of the primary assets within the asset groups. If the undiscounted cash flows do not indicate that the carrying amount of the asset group is recoverable, an impairment charge is recorded if the carrying amount of the asset group exceeds its fair value based on discounted cash flow analyses or appraisals.

     As a result of an agreement in the fourth quarter of 2009 to sell substantially all the assets of our Structures segment, we impaired the property, plant and equipment and amortizable intangibles of this segment by $121 and $29 in December 2009. Following the closing related to this sale in March 2010, no intangible assets remain in this segment. The remaining property, plant and equipment of the Structures segment, including assets held for sale, has a carrying value of $30 as of June 30, 2010. Based on our current cash flow projections, the undiscounted cash flows exceed the carrying value of these assets and we do not expect to impair these assets in the future. For our other operating segments, the June 2009 analysis of undiscounted cash flows and improvements in earnings and cash flow projections since that analysis indicate that the cash flows significantly exceed the carrying values. In addition, no triggering events have occurred. Accordingly, we do not believe that these long-lived assets are at risk of being impaired.

Components of amortizable and non-amortizable intangible assets –

		Weighted				June 30, 2010												December 31, 2009
		Average				Gross				Accumulated				Net				Gross				Accumulated				Net
		Useful Life				Carrying				Impairment and				Carrying				Carrying				Impairment and				Carrying
		(years)				Amount				Amortization				Amount				Amount				Amortization				Amount
Amortizable intangible assets
Core technology			7			$	90			$	(34	)		$	56			$	98			$	(31	)		$	67
Trademarks and trade names			17				4				(1	)			3				4								4
Customer relationships			8				397				(143	)			254				483				(165	)			318
Non-amortizable intangible assets
Trademarks and trade names							65								65				65								65
Less: Assets held for sale																			(62	)			46				(16	)
						$	556			$	(178	)		$	378			$	588			$	(150	)		$	438

     The net carrying amounts of intangible assets attributable to each of our operating segments at June 30, 2010 were as follows: LVD – $21, Power Technologies – $47, Commercial Vehicle – $174 and Off-Highway – $136.

     Amortization expense related to the amortizable intangible assets is shown in the table below.

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		June 30,								June 30,
		2010				2009				2010				2009
Charged to cost of sales		$	3			$	3			$	7			$	7
Charged to amortization of intangibles			16				18				31				35
Total amortization		$	19			$	21			$	38			$	42

     Estimated aggregate pre-tax amortization expense related to intangible assets for each of the next five years based on June 30, 2010 exchange rates are: remainder of 2010 – $30, 2011 – $58, 2012 – $58, 2013 – $58 and 2014 – $55. Actual amounts may differ from these estimates due to such factors as currency translation, customer turnover, impairments, additional intangible asset acquisitions and other events.

Note 5. Capital Stock

Series A and Series B Preferred Stock – Dividends on our 4.0% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and 4.0% Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (preferred stock) have been accrued from the issue date and are payable in cash on a quarterly basis as approved by the Board of Directors. The payment of preferred dividends was suspended in November 2008 under the terms of our Term Facility Credit and Guaranty Agreement as amended on November 21, 2008 (the Amended Term Facility) but became payable at the discretion of our Board of Directors at the end of 2009 when our total leverage ratio became less than 3.25:1.00. A dividend payment of $16 was made in April 2010 leaving us with preferred dividends accrued at June 30, 2010 of $42. In July 2010, the Board of Directors authorized the payment of a $2 per share dividend to shareholders of our preferred stock. An aggregate cash payment of $16, representing two quarterly dividends, is payable on August 16, 2010 to preferred shareholders of record as of the close of business on July 30, 2010.

Common Stock – As of June 30, 2010, there were 140,441,226 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding, net of 181,576 in treasury shares withheld at cost to satisfy tax obligations due upon the payment of stock awards and other taxable distributions of shares.

Note 6. Earnings per Share

     The following table reconciles the weighted-average number of shares used in the basic earnings per share calculations to the weighted-average number of shares used to compute diluted earnings per share (in millions of shares):

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		June 30,								June 30,
		2010				2009				2010				2009
Weighted-average number of shares
outstanding — basic			140.3				100.2				139.9				100.2
Employee compensation-related
shares, including stock options			5.8
Weighted-average number of shares
outstanding — diluted			146.1				100.2				139.9				100.2

     Basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated by dividing the net income (loss) attributable to parent company stockholders, less preferred stock dividend requirements, by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. The outstanding common shares computation excludes any shares held in treasury. Under the terms of our Series A and Series B convertible preferred stock, the conversion price is $11.93. Our preferred shares would have converted into approximately 66.2 and 59.9 million shares of common stock at June 30, 2010 and 2009. Conversion of the preferred stock is not included in the share count for diluted earnings per share for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 because the inclusion of the converted preferred shares and the exclusion of the preferred dividend from earnings would result in earnings per share that are anti-dilutive. Conversion of the preferred stock was not included in the share count for diluted earnings per share in the other periods reported due to the anti-dilutive effect on the net loss.

     The share count for diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed on the basis of the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding plus the effects of dilutive common stock equivalents (CSEs) outstanding during the period. We excluded 1.4 million and 6.0 million CSEs from the calculations of earnings per share for the quarters ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 and 1.9 million and 5.8 million CSEs from the calculations for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 as the effect of including them would have been anti-dilutive. In addition, we excluded CSEs that satisfied the definition of potentially dilutive shares of 0.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and we excluded 5.7 million and 0.5 million for the six-month periods in 2010 and 2009 due to the dilutive effect on the loss for these periods.

Note 7. Incentive and Stock Compensation

     Our Board of Directors granted 0.9 million stock options, 0.2 million stock appreciation rights (SARs), 0.5 million notional performance shares and 0.1 million restricted stock units (RSUs) during the first half of 2010 under the 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan. The weighted-average per share exercise price of the options and SARs issued during the period was $11.58 and $11.33. The weighted-average per share fair value at grant date of the options and SARs issued during the period was $7.14 and $6.98. The weighted-average per share grant-date fair value of the performance shares and RSUs were $11.37 and $11.72. Stock options and SARs related to 1.0 million shares were exercised and 0.2 million shares were forfeited in the first half of 2010.

     We estimated fair values for options and SARs granted during the first six months of 2010 using the following key assumptions as part of the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The expected term was estimated using the simplified method because the limited period of time our common stock has been publicly traded provides insufficient historical exercise data.

		Options			SARs
Expected term (in years)		6.00			6.00
Risk-free interest rate		2.81	%		2.75	%
Expected volatility		66.09	%		66.10	%

     We recognized stock compensation expense of $3 and $2 during the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 and $6 and $4 during the respective six-month periods. As of June 30, 2010, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested portions of all stock based awards granted and expected to vest over the next 0.5 to 2.9 years was $17. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of one year.

Note 8. Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans

     We have a number of defined contribution and defined benefit, qualified and nonqualified, pension plans for certain employees. Other postretirement benefit plans (OPEB), including medical and life insurance, are provided for certain employees upon retirement.

Components of net periodic benefit costs —

		Pension																OPEB - Non-U.S.
		Three Months Ended June 30,																Three Months Ended
		2010								2009								June 30,
		U.S.				Non-U.S.				U.S.				Non-U.S.				2010				2009
Service cost		$	—			$	1			$	—			$	2			$	—			$	—
Interest cost			26				5				28				4				2				2
Expected return on plan assets			(24	)			(2	)			(29	)			(2	)
Amortization of net actuarial loss			3
Net periodic benefit cost (credit)			5				4				(1	)			4				2				2
Curtailment gain																							(1	)
Settlement loss							1
Net periodic benefit cost (credit) after curtailment gain		$	5			$	5			$	(1	)		$	4			$	2			$	1

		Pension																OPEB - Non-U.S.
		Six Months Ended June 30,																Six Months Ended
		2010								2009								June 30,
		U.S.				Non-U.S.				U.S.				Non-U.S.				2010				2009
Service cost		$	—			$	2			$	—			$	3			$	—			$	—
Interest cost			52				9				55				9				4				3
Expected return on plan assets			(48	)			(3	)			(58	)			(4	)
Amortization of net actuarial loss			6
Net periodic benefit cost (credit)			10				8				(3	)			8				4				3
Curtailment gain																			(1	)			(1	)
Settlement loss							1
Net periodic benefit cost (credit) after curtailment gain		$	10			$	9			$	(3	)		$	8			$	3			$	2

Note 9. Comprehensive Income (Loss)

     Comprehensive income (loss) includes the net income (loss) attributable to the parent company and components of other comprehensive income (OCI) such as currency translation adjustments that are charged or credited directly to equity.

Components of total comprehensive income (loss) —

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		June 30,								June 30,
		2010				2009				2010				2009
Parent company:
Net income (loss) attributable to parent company		$	9			$	—			$	(22	)		$	(157	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Currency translation adjustments			(64	)			104				(92	)			56
Benefit plan actuarial loss, net							(5	)			(2	)			(15	)
Benefit plan curtailments											1
Benefit plan settlements			1								1
Reclassification to net loss of divestiture CTA											10
Reclassification to net income (loss) of benefit plan amortization			3								6
Income tax provision							(9	)							(9	)
Unrealized investment gains (loss) and other			3				30				(1	)			19
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the parent company		$	(48	)		$	120			$	(99	)		$	(106	)
Noncontrolling interests:
Net income (loss)		$	1			$	(3	)		$	2			$	(6	)
Other comprehensive income:
Currency translation							4				1				1
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests			1				1				3				(5	)
Total comprehensive income (loss)		$	(47	)		$	121			$	(96	)		$	(111	)

Changes in equity —

		Parent				Noncontrolling				Total
		Equity				Interests				Equity
Balance, December 31, 2008		$	2,028			$	107			$	2,135
Comprehensive loss			(106	)			(5	)			(111	)
Preferred stock dividends			(16	)							(16	)
Stock compensation			4								4
Dividends paid							(2	)			(2	)
Balance, June 30, 2009		$	1,910			$	100			$	2,010
Balance, December 31, 2009		$	1,679			$	100			$	1,779
Comprehensive income (loss)			(99	)			3				(96	)
Preferred stock dividends			(16	)							(16	)
Stock compensation			7								7
Dividends paid							(5	)			(5	)
Balance, June 30, 2010		$	1,571			$	98			$	1,669

Note 10. Cash Deposits

     Cash deposits are maintained to provide credit enhancement for certain agreements and are reported as part of cash and cash equivalents. For most of these deposits, the cash may be withdrawn if comparable security is provided in the form of letters of credit. Accordingly, these deposits are not considered to be restricted.

		U.S.				Non-U.S.				Total
Cash and cash equivalents		$	551			$	354			$	905
Cash and cash equivalents held as deposits			3				40				43
Cash and cash equivalents held at less-than-wholly-owned subsidiaries							111				111
Balance at June 30, 2010		$	554			$	505			$	1,059

     A portion of the non-U.S. cash and cash equivalents is utilized for working capital and other operating purposes. Several countries have local regulatory requirements that significantly restrict the ability of our operations to repatriate this cash. Beyond these restrictions, there are practical limitations on repatriation of cash from certain countries because of the resulting tax withholdings.

Note 11. Financing Agreements

Exit financing – As of June 30, 2010, we had gross borrowings of $917 and unamortized original issue discount (OID) of $47 under the Amended Term Facility and no borrowings under the Revolving Facility. We had utilized $146 for letters of credit. The weighted-average interest rate on the term loan debt was 4.6% at June 30, 2010. Based on our borrowing base collateral of $383, we had potential availability at that date under the Revolving Facility of $237 after deducting the outstanding letters of credit.

     The provisions of our Amended Term Facility require that net cash proceeds from the Structural Products business divestiture be used to pay down our term loan debt within five days of being received. During March 2010, a total of $83 was received in the U.S. and remitted to our lenders. Approximately $8 of the $83 was received by the Dana subsidiary that acquired approximately 10% of parent company debt in 2009. In connection with the debt repayment, we wrote off the related OID of $4 as a loss on extinguishment of debt, resulting in a $71 decrease in net debt and we expensed $2 of related issuance costs as interest expense. There was $30 of cash proceeds received in March which was still held outside the U.S. at March 31. During the second quarter of 2010, $7 of the proceeds was repatriated to the U.S. and a like amount of our term loan was repaid. Approximately $1 of the $7 was received by the Dana subsidiary that acquired approximately 10% of parent company debt in 2009 resulting in a $6 decrease in net debt. The remaining $23 of cash proceeds will be remitted to our lenders, net of applicable taxes, when repatriated to the U.S. The remainder of the proceeds, including the working capital recovery, will be used to repay our term facility debt when received from Metalsa.

     During the second quarter of 2009, we used cash of $77 to reduce the principal amount of our Term Facility borrowings by $125, primarily through market purchases. The accounting for this activity included a reduction of $8 in the related OID and resulted in the recording of a $40 net gain on extinguishment of debt, which is included in other income, net. Debt issuance costs of $3 were written off as a charge to interest expense.

Interest rate agreements – Interest on the Amended Term Facility accrues at variable interest rates. Under the Amended Term Facility we are required to carry interest rate hedge agreements covering a notional amount of not less than 50% of the aggregate loans outstanding under the Amended Term Facility until January 2011. The fair value of this contract, which effectively caps our interest rate at 10.25% on $699 of debt, was less than $1 as of June 30, 2010.

European receivables loan facility – At June 30, 2010, there were no borrowings under this facility although $155 of accounts receivable available as collateral under the program would have supported $90 of borrowings.

Covenants – We were in compliance with our debt covenants at June 30, 2010 and, based on our current forecast assumptions, we expect to be able to satisfy our debt covenants during the next twelve months. Our covenants did not restrict the borrowing available from our credit facilities, which was $327, based on the borrowing base collateral of our credit lines.

Note 12. Fair Value Measurements

     In measuring the fair value of our assets and liabilities, we use market data or assumptions that we believe market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability including assumptions about risk when appropriate. Our valuation techniques include a combination of observable and unobservable inputs.

Items measured at fair value on a recurring basis – Assets and liabilities that are carried in our balance sheet at fair value are as follows:

						Fair Value Measurements Using
						Quoted				Significant
						Prices in				Other				Significant
						Markets				Inputs				Inputs
						Active				Observable				Unobservable
		Total				(Level 1)				(Level 2)				(Level 3)
June 30, 2010:
Notes receivable — noncurrent asset		$	97			$	—			$	—			$	97
Currency forward contracts — current asset			4								4
Currency forward contracts — current liability			6								6
December 31, 2009:
Notes receivable — noncurrent asset		$	94			$	—			$	—			$	94
Currency forward contracts — current liability			4								4

Changes in level 3 recurring fair value measurements –

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		June 30,								June 30,
		2010				2009				2010				2009
Notes receivable
Beginning of period		$	94			$	14			$	91			$	20
Accretion of value (interest income)			3				3				6				5
Unrealized gain (OCI)							28								20
End of period		$	97			$	45			$	97			$	45

     Substantially all of the notes receivable amount consists of one note, due 2019, obtained in connection with a divestiture in 2004. Its carrying amount is adjusted each quarter to the lower of its contractual value or its fair value, which is based on the market value of publicly traded debt of the operating subsidiary of the obligor. The fair value of the note at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 approximated the contractual value and we believe that the note will be paid in full at the end of the term. Net changes in the values of the other notes receivable were less than $1.

Items measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis – In addition to items that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, we also have assets that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These assets include long-lived assets which may be written down to fair value as a result of impairment. The intangible assets and the property, plant and equipment of the Structures segment were impaired by $150 to a Level 3 value at December 31, 2009. Following impairment, the intangible assets were valued at $16 and the property, plant and equipment at $65. Substantially all of these assets were sold during the first quarter of 2010.

Note 13. Risk Management and Derivatives

     The total notional amounts of outstanding foreign currency derivatives as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $146 and $86, comprised of forward contracts involving the exchange of U.S. dollars, euros, British pounds, Swiss francs, Swedish krona, Japanese yen and Indian rupees plus a cross-currency swap involving the exchange of Australian dollars and the South African rand. Our foreign exchange contracts are not designated as hedges and, accordingly, changes in fair value of these instruments are reported in income in the period in which they occur. Forward contracts associated with product-related transactions are marked to market in cost of sales while other contracts are marked to market through other income (expense), net.

     The fair values of derivative instruments included within the consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are $4 of receivables under forward contracts reported as part of other current assets and $6 of payables under forward contacts reported in other accrued liabilities, compared to less than $1 of receivables under forward contracts and $4 of payables under forward contacts as of December 31, 2009. We also carry an interest rate cap on a notional value of $699 of our long-term debt. The fair value of this derivative at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was less than $1.

Note 14. Commitments and Contingencies

Asbestos personal injury liabilities – We had approximately 31,000 active pending asbestos personal injury liability claims at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. Approximately 11,000 mostly inactive claims have been settled and are awaiting final documentation and dismissal, with or without payment. We have accrued $110 for indemnity and defense costs for settled, pending and future claims at June 30, 2010, compared to $113 at December 31, 2009. We use a fifteen-year time horizon for our estimate of this liability.

     At June 30, 2010, we had recorded $58 as an asset for probable recovery from our insurers for the pending and projected asbestos personal injury liability claims, unchanged from the asset at December 31, 2009. The recorded asset represents our assessment of the capacity of our current insurance agreements to provide for the payment of anticipated defense and indemnity costs for pending claims and projected future demands. The recognition of these recoveries is based on our assessment of our right to recover under the respective contracts and on the financial strength of the insurers. We have coverage in place agreements with our insurers confirming substantially all of the related coverage, and payments are being received on a timely basis. The financial strength of these insurers is reviewed at least annually with the assistance of a third party. The recorded asset does not represent the limits of our insurance coverage, but rather the amount we would expect to recover if we paid the accrued indemnity and defense costs. During the first six months of 2010, we recorded $1 of pre-tax expense ($2 during the first quarter, offset by a $1 credit during the second quarter) to correct amounts primarily associated with asbestos-related insurance receivables at December 31, 2009. These adjustments were not considered material to the current period or to the prior periods to which they relate.

     During the second quarter of 2009, we determined that our post-reorganization claims activity warranted a reevaluation of our estimated liability for asbestos claims. This resulted in a reduction of the estimated liability and a benefit of $6, net of insurance recoverables, which was recognized in selling, general and administrative expense.

Other product liabilities – We had accrued $2 for non-asbestos product liability costs at June 30, 2010 compared to $1 at December 31, 2009, with no recovery expected from third parties at either date. We estimate these liabilities based on assumptions about the value of the claims and about the likelihood of recoveries against us derived from our historical experience and current information.

Environmental liabilities – Accrued environmental liabilities at June 30, 2010 were $15, compared to $17 at December 31, 2009. We consider the most probable method of remediation, current laws and regulations and existing technology in determining the fair value of our environmental liabilities. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, other accounts receivable included $2 recoverable from an insurer in connection with an agreement reached in the second quarter of 2009.

Bankruptcy claims resolution – On the Effective Date, the Plan was consummated and we emerged from Chapter 11. As provided in the Plan, we issued and set aside approximately 28 million shares of Dana common stock (valued in reorganization at $640) for future distribution to holders of allowed unsecured nonpriority claims in Class 5B under the Plan. These shares are being distributed as the disputed and unliquidated claims are resolved. Since emergence, we have issued 24 million of the 28 million shares for allowed claims (valued in reorganization at $542), increasing the total shares issued to 94 million (valued in reorganization at $2,170) for unsecured claims of approximately $2,251. The corresponding decrease in the disputed claims reserve leaves approximately 4 million shares (valued in reorganization at $100). The remaining disputed and unliquidated claims total approximately $73. To the extent that these remaining claims are settled for less than the 4 million remaining shares, additional incremental distributions will be made to the holders of the previously allowed general unsecured claims in Class 5B.

     Although the allowed amount of certain disputed claims has not yet been determined, our liability associated with these disputed claims was discharged upon our emergence from Chapter 11. Therefore, the future resolution of these disputed claims will not have an impact on our results of operations or financial condition.

Other legal matters – We are subject to various pending or threatened legal proceedings arising out of the normal course of business or operations. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of such matters, we cannot state what the eventual outcome of these matters will be. However, based on current knowledge and after consultation with legal counsel, we believe that the liabilities that may result from these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, financial condition or results of operations.

Note 15. Warranty Obligations

     We record a liability for estimated warranty obligations at the dates our products are sold. We record the liability based on our estimate of costs to settle future claims. Adjustments are made as new information becomes available. Changes in our warranty liabilities are as follows:

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		June 30,								June 30,
		2010				2009				2010				2009
Balance, beginning of period		$	82			$	93			$	83			$	100
Amounts accrued for current period sales			12				5				24				13
Adjustments of prior accrual estimates			2				(5	)			3				(5	)
Settlements of warranty claims			(11	)			(13	)			(24	)			(26	)
Foreign currency translation and other			(2	)			3				(3	)			1
Balance, end of period		$	83			$	83			$	83			$	83

     We have been notified by Toyota Motor Corporation concerning a quality issue relating to frame corrosion on certain Toyota Tacoma trucks produced between 1995 and 2004 that could allegedly result in a warranty claim. Dana and Toyota have been involved in discussions regarding this matter and have recently agreed to participate in non-binding mediation. Based on the information currently available, we do not believe that this matter will result in a material liability to Dana. In addition, we have been notified of an alleged quality issue at a foreign subsidiary of Dana that produces engine coolers for Sogefi that are used in modules supplied to Volkswagen. Based on the information currently available to us, we do not believe that this matter will result in a material liability to Dana.

Note 16. Income Taxes

     We estimate the effective tax rate expected to be applicable for the full fiscal year and use that rate to provide for income taxes in interim reporting periods. We also recognize the tax impact of certain discrete (unusual or infrequently occurring) items, including changes in judgment about valuation allowances and effects of changes in tax laws or rates, in the interim period in which they occur.

     We provide for U.S. federal income and non-U.S. withholding taxes on the future repatriations of the earnings from our non-U.S. operations. During the first six months of 2010, we continued to modify our forecast for future repatriations due to the current market conditions. Accordingly, we adjusted the future income and non-U.S. withholding tax liabilities for these repatriations and recognized an expense of $1 and $3 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010. We recognized a benefit of $12 and $19 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009.

     We record interest income or expense, as well as penalties, related to uncertain tax positions as a component of income tax expense or benefit. Net interest expense of less than $1 was recognized in income tax expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and $1 and $4 was recognized in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. During the first quarter of 2010, we reversed accruals for uncertain tax positions of $9 related to the 1999 through 2002 and 2003 through 2005 U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) audit cycles that were settled during the quarter. During the second quarter of 2010, we paid a bankruptcy claim of $75 in satisfaction of the settlement of these audit cycles.

     We have generally not recognized tax benefits on losses generated in several countries, including the U.S., where the recent history of operating losses does not allow us to satisfy the “more likely than not” criterion for the recognition of deferred tax assets. Consequently, there is no income tax benefit recognized on the pre-tax losses in these jurisdictions as valuation allowances are established offsetting the associated tax benefit.

     We reported income tax expense of $17 and $14 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and income tax benefit of $21 and $30 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. The income tax rate varies from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the existence of valuation allowances in many countries, non-deductible expenses, withholding taxes related to expected repatriations of international earnings and adjustments to uncertain tax reserves.

Note 17. Other Income (Expense), Net

Other income (expense), net included —

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		June 30,								June 30,
		2010				2009				2010				2009
Interest income		$	7			$	6			$	13			$	12
Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt							40				(4	)			40
Foreign exchange gain (loss)			2				5				(10	)			6
Loss on sale of Structural Products business											(5	)
Contract cancellation income															17
Other			3				10				5				15
Other income (expense), net		$	12			$	61			$	(1	)		$	90

     As discussed in Note 11, the gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt resulted from the repayment and repurchase of term loan debt.

     The sale of substantially all of our Structural Products business is discussed in Note 2.

     Dana and its subsidiaries enter into foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge currency exposure on certain intercompany loans and accrued interest balances as well as to reduce exposure in cross-currency transactions in the normal course of business. Foreign exchange forward contracts are marked to market, with the gain or loss recorded in cost of sales for material purchase transactions and in other income (expense), net for intercompany accounts. Foreign exchange gains and losses on cross-currency intercompany loan balances that are not considered permanently invested are included in foreign exchange gain (loss) above. Foreign exchange gains and losses on loans that are permanently invested are reported in OCI. Foreign exchange gain (loss) for the six months ended June 30, 2010 also includes a charge of $3 for the devaluation of the Venezuelan bolivar.

     The contract cancellation income of $17 in 2009 represents recoveries in connection with early cancellation of certain customer programs during the first quarter of 2009.

Note 18. Segments

     The components that management establishes for purposes of making decisions about an enterprise’s operating matters are referred to as “operating segments.” We manage our operations globally through five operating segments with three operating segments – LVD, Structures and Power Technologies – focused on specific products for the light vehicle market and two operating segments – Commercial Vehicle and Off-Highway – focused on specific medium-duty and heavy-duty vehicle markets. In the first quarter of 2010, the reporting of our operating segment results was reorganized in line with our management structure and internal reporting as the Sealing and Thermal segments were combined into the Power Technologies segment. The results of these segments have been retroactively adjusted to conform to the current reporting.

     In March 2010, we completed the sale of substantially all of our Structures segment. We retained the Longview, Texas facility in this segment and we are continuing to report the results of that operation in our Structures segment. The operations of the Structures segment in Venezuela are also included pending the close on the sale of the operations which is expected to occur in the third quarter.

     The primary measure of operating results is segment EBITDA which is closely aligned with the definition of EBITDA in our debt agreements. Our segments receive a charge for corporate and other shared administrative costs. Costs allocated to the operating segments are $29 and $28 for the three months and $60 and $56 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.

     We used the following information to evaluate our operating segments:

		Three Months Ended June 30,
		2010												2009
						Inter-												Inter-
		External				Segment				Segment				External				Segment				Segment
		Sales				Sales				EBITDA				Sales				Sales				EBITDA
LVD		$	650			$	48			$	66			$	444			$	29			$	39
Power Technologies			234				7				35				161				4				1
Commercial Vehicle			335				22				37				262				16				23
Off-Highway			287				10				25				194				6				5
Structures			18								(3	)			129				2
Eliminations and other			2				(87	)											(57	)
Total		$	1,526			$	—			$	160			$	1,190			$	—			$	68

		Six Months Ended June 30,
		2010												2009
						Inter-												Inter-
		External				Segment				Segment				External				Segment				Segment
		Sales				Sales				EBITDA				Sales				Sales				EBITDA
LVD		$	1,227			$	92			$	110			$	861			$	58			$	31
Power Technologies			462				13				62				317				7
Commercial Vehicle			637				44				59				526				28				29
Off-Highway			544				18				46				456				14				16
Structures			162				2				8				246				4				9
Eliminations and other			2				(169	)											(111	)
Total		$	3,034			$	—			$	285			$	2,406			$	—			$	85

     The following table reconciles segment EBITDA to the consolidated income (loss) before income taxes:

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		June 30,								June 30,
		2010				2009				2010				2009
Segment EBITDA		$	160			$	68			$	285			$	85
Shared services and administrative			(4	)			(5	)			(9	)			(10	)
Other income (expense) not in segments			(3	)			33				(9	)			32
Foreign exchange not in segments			1				(2	)			(5	)			3
Depreciation			(61	)			(79	)			(123	)			(152	)
Amortization of intangibles			(19	)			(21	)			(38	)			(42	)
Restructuring			(31	)			(29	)			(50	)			(79	)
Impairment of long-lived assets							(6	)							(6	)
Reorganization items, net							3								2
Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt							40				(4	)			40
Strategic transaction expenses							(2	)							(2	)
Loss on sale of assets, net			(1	)							(6	)			(1	)
Stock compensation expense			(3	)			(2	)			(5	)			(4	)
Foreign exchange on intercompany loans, Venezuelan currency devaluation and market value adjustments on forwards			(3	)			10				(15	)			5
Interest expense			(20	)			(37	)			(46	)			(72	)
Interest income			7				6				13				12
Income (loss) before income taxes		$	23			$	(23	)		$	(12	)		$	(189	)