e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(MARK ONE)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 |
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to |
Commission file number 001-15149
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC.
Incorporated pursuant to the Laws of the State of DELAWARE
Internal Revenue Service Employer Identification No. 42-0991521
2140 LAKE PARK BLVD., RICHARDSON, TEXAS, 75080
(972-497-5000)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated Filer þ
|
|
Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Non-Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).
Yes o No þ
As of April 21, 2011, the number of shares outstanding of the registrants common stock, par
value $.01 per share, was 53,329,436.
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC.
FORM 10-Q
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
INDEX
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
55.2 |
|
|
$ |
160.0 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
Accounts and notes receivable, net of allowances of $16.4 and $12.8 in 2011 and 2010, respectively |
|
|
404.6 |
|
|
|
384.8 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
453.2 |
|
|
|
286.2 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
41.2 |
|
|
|
36.7 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
82.3 |
|
|
|
67.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,047.0 |
|
|
|
946.9 |
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net of accumulated
depreciation of $596.3 and $584.7 in 2011 and 2010,
respectively |
|
|
348.4 |
|
|
|
324.3 |
|
GOODWILL |
|
|
321.3 |
|
|
|
271.8 |
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES |
|
|
88.6 |
|
|
|
87.2 |
|
OTHER ASSETS, net |
|
|
95.1 |
|
|
|
61.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
1,900.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,692.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
Asset securitization borrowings |
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
340.8 |
|
|
|
273.8 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
281.8 |
|
|
|
334.5 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
676.6 |
|
|
|
615.6 |
|
LONG-TERM DEBT |
|
|
488.5 |
|
|
|
317.0 |
|
POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS, OTHER THAN PENSIONS |
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
PENSIONS |
|
|
88.7 |
|
|
|
88.1 |
|
OTHER LIABILITIES |
|
|
64.4 |
|
|
|
65.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,334.0 |
|
|
|
1,102.3 |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 25,000,000 shares
authorized, no shares issued or outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares
authorized, 86,594,374 shares and 86,480,816
shares issued for 2011 and 2010, respectively |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
870.6 |
|
|
|
863.5 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
625.4 |
|
|
|
642.2 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
41.4 |
|
|
|
30.2 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 33,274,352 shares and
32,784,503 shares for
2011 and 2010, respectively |
|
|
(971.9 |
) |
|
|
(947.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
566.4 |
|
|
|
589.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
1,900.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,692.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited, in millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
NET SALES |
|
$ |
687.8 |
|
|
$ |
644.1 |
|
COST OF GOODS SOLD |
|
|
522.6 |
|
|
|
469.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
165.2 |
|
|
|
174.3 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
173.9 |
|
|
|
168.9 |
|
Gains and other expenses, net |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Restructuring charges |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
Income from equity method investments |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational (loss) income from continuing operations |
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
INTEREST EXPENSE, net |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
(11.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
BENEFIT FROM INCOME TAXES |
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Benefit from income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(7.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOSS PER SHARE BASIC AND DILUTED: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING BASIC AND DILUTED |
|
|
53.6 |
|
|
|
56.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER SHARE |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010
(Unaudited, in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(7.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.6 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from equity method investments |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
Restructuring expenses, net of cash paid |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Unrealized loss on derivative contracts |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
2.2 |
|
Other items, net |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions and divestitures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable |
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(136.3 |
) |
|
|
(85.6 |
) |
Other current assets |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
50.9 |
|
|
|
48.7 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
(60.9 |
) |
|
|
(28.7 |
) |
Income taxes payable and receivable |
|
|
(25.9 |
) |
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(148.3 |
) |
|
|
(40.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
|
(10.7 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of businesses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Acquisition of business |
|
|
(144.2 |
) |
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
Restricted cash |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
(25.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(150.1 |
) |
|
|
(39.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings, net |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Asset securitization borrowings, net |
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term payments |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(35.1 |
) |
Revolver long-term borrowings, net |
|
|
171.5 |
|
|
|
93.0 |
|
Proceeds from stock option exercises |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(24.7 |
) |
|
|
(39.4 |
) |
Excess tax benefits related to share-based payments |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
191.8 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(106.6 |
) |
|
|
(63.8 |
) |
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
|
|
160.0 |
|
|
|
124.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period |
|
$ |
55.2 |
|
|
$ |
63.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes (net of refunds) |
|
$ |
21.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. General:
References in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to we, our, us, LII or the Company
refer to Lennox International Inc. and its subsidiaries, unless the context requires otherwise.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 2011, the accompanying
unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010,
and the accompanying unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010 should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial
statements and footnotes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2010. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information
and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. The accompanying
consolidated financial statements contain all material adjustments, consisting principally of
normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position, results
of operations and cash flows. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in
financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to
applicable rules and regulations, although we believe that the disclosures herein are adequate to
make the information presented not misleading. The operating results for the interim periods are
not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for a full year.
Our fiscal year ends on December 31 and our quarters are each comprised of 13 weeks. For
convenience, throughout these financial statements, the 13 weeks comprising each quarterly period
are denoted by the last day of the respective calendar quarter.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions about
future events. These estimates and the underlying assumptions affect the amounts of assets and
liabilities reported, disclosures about contingent assets and liabilities, and reported amounts of
revenues and expenses. Such estimates include the valuation of accounts receivable, inventories,
goodwill, intangible assets, and other long-lived assets, contingencies, guarantee obligations,
indemnifications, and assumptions used in the calculation of income taxes, pension and
postretirement medical benefits, among others. These estimates and assumptions are based on
managements best estimates and judgment.
We evaluate these estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience
and other factors, including the current economic environment. We believe these estimates and
assumptions to be reasonable under the circumstances and adjust such estimates and assumptions when
facts and circumstances dictate.
2. Inventories:
Components of inventories are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Finished goods |
|
$ |
324.9 |
|
|
$ |
213.7 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
Raw materials and repair parts |
|
|
182.1 |
|
|
|
137.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
524.6 |
|
|
|
357.2 |
|
Excess of current cost over last-in, first-out cost |
|
|
(71.4 |
) |
|
|
(71.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories, net |
|
$ |
453.2 |
|
|
$ |
286.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
3. Acquisition:
On January 14, 2011, we acquired substantially all the assets of the Kysor/Warren business
from The Manitowoc Company. Kysor/Warren is a leading manufacturer of refrigerated systems and
display cases for supermarkets throughout North America and will be included in our Refrigeration
Segment. The total consideration for the acquisition was $144.2 million, including post-closing
purchase price working capital adjustments. In connection with this acquisition, we recorded
goodwill of $43.3 million and intangible assets of $33.4 million. The intangible assets consisted
of the following: trade names of $5.0 million with indefinite lives, customer relationships of
$26.2 million with 11 to 12 year lives, and other intangibles of $2.2 million with lives ranging
from one to eight years. We paid more than the fair value of the underlying net assets as a result
of expected operational synergies. The entire $43.3 million of goodwill is expected to be
deductible for tax purposes. The initial accounting for this acquisition is substantially
complete with the exception of additional minor adjustments as allowed under the purchase
agreement. Overall, the acquisition would not have had a significant impact on our historical results.
4. Goodwill:
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the first quarter of 2011, in total and by
segment, are as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, |
|
|
Acquisitions/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
(Dispositions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31, 2011 |
|
Segment: |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
(2) |
|
|
Other(3) |
|
|
Goodwill |
|
Residential Heating & Cooling |
|
$ |
33.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
33.7 |
|
Commercial Heating & Cooling. |
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Service Experts(1) |
|
|
116.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
120.3 |
|
Refrigeration |
|
|
91.5 |
|
|
|
43.3 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
136.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
271.8 |
|
|
$ |
43.3 |
|
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
|
$ |
321.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Service Experts goodwill was reduced for accumulated impairment losses of $208.0
million from prior periods. |
|
(2) |
|
During 2011, our Refrigeration segment acquired Kysor/Warren which resulted in
additional goodwill of $43.3 million. |
|
(3) |
|
Other consists primarily of changes in foreign currency translation rates. |
We performed our annual goodwill impairment test in the first quarter of 2011. Based on this
test, our fair values exceeded the carrying values for each of our reporting units; therefore, we
recognized no goodwill impairment for any of our reporting units.
5. Derivatives:
Objectives and Strategies for Using Derivative Instruments
Commodity Price Risk
We utilize a cash flow hedging program to mitigate our exposure to volatility in the prices of
metal commodities we use in our production processes. The hedging program includes the use of
futures contracts, and we enter into these contracts based on our hedging strategy. We use a
dollar cost averaging strategy for our hedge program. As part of this strategy, a higher
percentage of commodity price exposures are hedged near term with lower percentages hedged at
future dates. This strategy provides us with protection against near-term price volatility cause
by market speculators and market forces, such as supply variation, while allowing us to adjust to
market price movements over time. Upon entering into futures contracts, we lock in prices and are
subject to derivative losses should the metal commodity prices decrease and gains should the price
increase.
Interest Rate Risk
A portion of our debt bears interest at variable interest rates and therefore, we are subject
to variability in the cash paid for interest expense. In order to mitigate a portion of the risk,
we use a hedging strategy to eliminate the variability of cash flows in the interest payments
associated with the first $100 million of the total variable-rate debt outstanding under our revolving credit facility that is solely due to changes in the
benchmark interest rate. This strategy allows us to fix a portion of our interest payments.
7
Foreign Currency Risk
Foreign currency exchange rate movements create a degree of risk by affecting the U.S. dollar
value of assets and liabilities arising in foreign currencies. Our objective for entering into
foreign currency forward contracts is to mitigate the impact of short-term currency exchange rate
movements on certain short-term intercompany transactions. In order to meet that objective, we
periodically enter into foreign currency forward contracts that act as economic hedges against
changes in foreign currency exchange rates. These forward contracts are not designated as hedges
and generally expire during the quarter.
Cash Flow Hedges
We include gains or losses in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) from our
commodity cash flow hedges. The gains or losses related to commodity price hedges are expected to
be reclassified into earnings based on the prices of the commodities at the settlement dates.
Assuming that commodity prices remain constant, $6.8 million of derivative gains are expected to be
reclassified into earnings within the next 12 months. Commodity futures contracts that are
designated as cash flow hedges and are in place as of March 31, 2011 are scheduled to mature
through July 2012.
We also include gains or losses in AOCI from our $100 million pay-fixed, receive-variable
interest rate swap with a financial institution at a fixed interest rate of 2.66%. The variable
portion of the interest rate swap is tied to the 1-Month LIBOR (the benchmark interest rate). The
interest rates under both the interest rate swap and the underlying debt are reset, the swap is
settled with the counterparty, and interest is paid, on a monthly basis. Assuming that the interest
rate environment remains constant, $1.4 million of derivative losses are expected to be
reclassified into earnings within the next 12 months. The interest rate swap expires October 12,
2012.
We recorded the following amounts related to our cash flow hedges (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Commodity Price Hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains included in AOCI, net of tax |
|
$ |
(6.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(11.7 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
Interest Rate Swap: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses included in AOCI, net of tax |
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
Benefit from income taxes |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
We had the following outstanding commodity futures contracts designated as cash flow hedges
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(pounds) |
|
|
(pounds) |
|
Copper |
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
Derivatives not Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
For commodity derivatives not designated as cash flow hedges, we follow the same hedging
strategy as for derivatives designated as cash flow hedges. We elect not to designate these
derivatives as cash flow hedges at the inception of the arrangement. We had the following
outstanding commodity futures contracts not designated as cash flow hedges (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(pounds) |
|
|
(pounds) |
|
Copper |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Aluminum |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
We had the following outstanding foreign currency forward contracts not designated as cash
flow hedges (in millions):
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Notional amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazilian Real |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
Mexican Peso |
|
|
119.0 |
|
|
|
138.0 |
|
Euros |
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
British Pounds |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Information About the Location and Amounts of Derivative Instruments
The following table provides the location and amounts of derivative fair values in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets and derivative gains and losses in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Values of Derivative Instruments(1) |
|
|
|
Derivatives Designated as |
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated as |
|
|
|
Hedging Instruments |
|
|
Hedging Instruments |
|
|
|
As of March 31, |
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
As of March 31, |
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity futures contracts |
|
$ |
10.9 |
|
|
$ |
17.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
Non-Current Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity futures contracts |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
11.1 |
|
|
$ |
18.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap |
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Foreign currency forward contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Current Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All our derivative instruments are classified as Level 2 within the fair value
hierarchy. For more information on other fair value measurements, see Note 15. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Amount of Loss or (Gain) Reclassified
from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity futures contracts(1) |
|
$ |
(5.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.9 |
) |
Interest rate swap(2) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(4.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Amount of (Gain) or Loss Recognized in Income on Derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity futures contracts(3) |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
Foreign currency forward contracts(3) |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The loss (gain) is recorded in Cost of Goods Sold in the accompanying
Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
|
(2) |
|
The loss (gain) is recorded in Interest Expense, net in the accompanying Consolidated
Statements of Operations. |
|
(3) |
|
The loss (gain) is recorded in Gains and Other Expenses, net in the
accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. |
6. Income Taxes:
As of March 31, 2011, we had approximately $1.1 million in total gross unrecognized tax
benefits. Of this amount, $0.7 million (net of federal benefit on state issues), if recognized,
would be recorded through the Consolidated Statement of Operations. As of March 31, 2011, we
recognized $0.1 million (net of federal tax benefits) in interest and penalties in income tax
expense in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) Topic 740.
We are currently under examination for our U.S. federal income taxes for 2011, 2010, 2009 and
2008 and are subject to examination by numerous other taxing authorities in the U.S. and in
jurisdictions such as Australia, Belgium, France, Canada, and Germany. We are generally no longer
subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by taxing authorities
for years before 2005.
Since January 1, 2011, numerous states including Arizona and Illinois have enacted
legislation effective for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2011, including changes to
rates and changes to apportionment methods. We believe any adjustments will be immaterial.
7. Commitments and Contingencies:
We are subject to contingencies that arise in the normal course of business, including product
warranties and other product related contingencies, pending litigation, environmental matters and
other guarantees or claims.
We use a combination of third-party insurance and self-insurance plans (large deductible or
captive) to provide protection against claims relating to contingencies such as workers
compensation, general liability, product liability, property damage, aviation liability, directors
and officers liability, auto liability, physical damage and other exposures. Self-insurance
expense and liabilities are actuarially determined based on our historical claims information, as
well as industry factors and trends and because we have a captive insurance company, we are
required to maintain specified levels of liquid assets from which we must pay claims. The majority
of our self-insured risks (excluding auto liability and physical damage) will be paid over an
extended period of time. There have been no material changes since our latest fiscal year-end. We
also maintain third-party insurance coverage for risks not retained within our large deductible or
captive insurance plans. The self-insurance liabilities recorded in Accrued expenses in the
accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets were $64.8 million and $61.3 million as of March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010, respectively.
Product Warranties and Product Related Contingencies
Total liabilities for estimated warranty are included in the following captions on the
accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
$ |
32.8 |
|
|
$ |
31.2 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
43.5 |
|
|
|
44.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
76.3 |
|
|
$ |
75.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
The changes in the total warranty liabilities for the first quarter of 2011 were as
follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Total warranty liability as of December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
75.5 |
|
Payments made in 2011 |
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
Changes resulting from issuance of new warranties |
|
|
5.6 |
|
Changes in estimates associated with pre-existing liabilities |
|
|
0.2 |
|
Changes in foreign currency translation rates and other |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total warranty liability as of March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
76.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
At the end of each accounting period, we evaluate our warranty liabilities and during the
second quarter of each year, we perform a complete reevaluation of our heating, ventilation and air
conditioning (HVAC) warranty liabilities.
We incur the risk of liability claims for the installation and service of heating and air
conditioning products, and we maintain liabilities for those claims that we self-insure. We are
involved in various claims and lawsuits related to our products. Our product liability insurance
policies have limits that, if exceeded, may result in substantial costs that could have an adverse
effect on our results of operations. In addition, warranty claims are not covered by our product
liability insurance and certain product liability claims also may not be covered by our product
liability insurance. There have been no material changes in the circumstances since our latest
fiscal year-end.
We may also incur costs related to our products that may not be covered under our warranties
and are not covered by insurance, and we may, from time to time, repair or replace installed
products experiencing quality issues in order to satisfy our customers and to protect our brand.
These product quality issues may be caused by vendor-supplied components that fail to meet required
specifications.
In addition to normal product warranty, we have identified a product quality issue in a
heating and cooling product line produced in 2006 and 2007 that we believe results from a
vendor-supplied materials quality issue. The expense for this product quality issue, and the
related liability, is not included in the tables related to our estimated warranty liabilities.
The expense related to this product quality issue was classified in Cost of Goods Sold in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations and the related liability is included in Accrued Expenses in
the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. We may incur additional charges in the future as more
information becomes available. The changes in the accrued product quality issue for the first
quarter of 2011 were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued product quality issue as of December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
16.0 |
|
Product quality claims |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total accrued product quality issue as of March 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
14.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
We estimate the costs to settle pending litigation based on experience involving similar
claims and specific facts known. We do not believe that any current or pending or threatened
litigation will have a material adverse effect on our financial position. Litigation and
arbitration, however, involve uncertainties and it is possible that the eventual outcome of
litigation could adversely affect our results of operations for a particular period. We are the
defendant in a class action lawsuit related to certain hearth products we produced and sold that
claims such products are hazardous and that consumers were not adequately warned. On August, 23,
2010, the Company and plaintiffs entered into a binding Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and
reached tentative terms for settlement of the case. At the parties request, the court stayed the
lawsuit shortly after the MOU was signed. On January 11, 2011, the court granted preliminary
approval of the settlement. The court set June 2, 2011 as the date for the final approval hearing.
We had $9.3 million in expenses to date related to this matter with no additional charges during
the first quarter of 2011.
Our obligations under the Lake Park Lease are secured by a pledge of our interest in the
leased property and are also guaranteed by us and certain of our subsidiaries. The Lake Park Lease,
as amended, contains restrictive covenants that are consistent with those of our domestic revolving
credit facility. We were in compliance with these financial covenants as of March 31, 2011.
8. Lines of Credit and Financing Arrangements:
The following tables summarize our outstanding debt obligations and the classification in the
accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions):
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, |
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Short-Term Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign obligations |
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
Asset securitization |
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term debt |
|
$ |
52.7 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt: |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
Domestic revolving credit facility |
|
|
271.5 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Senior unsecured notes |
|
|
200.0 |
|
|
|
200.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
488.5 |
|
|
$ |
317.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
$ |
541.6 |
|
|
$ |
319.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Debt
Foreign Obligations
Through several of our foreign subsidiaries, we have $10.9 million in committed combined
foreign facilities to assist in financing seasonal borrowing needs for our foreign locations. We
had $10.9 million and $10.1 million of available capacity as of March 31, 2011 and December 31,
2010, respectively. Our foreign obligations of $2.7 million represented borrowings under
non-committed facilities.
Asset Securitization
Under a revolving period asset securitization arrangement (ASA), we are eligible to sell
beneficial interests in a portion of our trade accounts receivable to participating financial
institutions for cash. The arrangement is subject to renewal and contains a provision whereby we
retained the right to repurchase all of the outstanding beneficial interests transferred. Our
continued involvement with the transferred assets includes servicing, collection and administration
of the transferred beneficial interests. The sale of the beneficial interests in our trade
accounts receivable are reflected as secured borrowings in the accompanying Consolidated Balance
Sheets and proceeds received are included in cash flows from financing activities in the
accompanying Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The ASA provides for a maximum securitization
amount of $100.0 million or 100% of the net pool balance as defined by the ASA. However,
eligibility for securitization is limited based on the amount and quality of the qualifying
accounts receivable and is calculated monthly. The beneficial interest sold cannot exceed the
maximum amount even if our qualifying accounts receivable is greater than the maximum amount at any
point in time. In the first quarter of 2011, we sold a beneficial interest in $50.0 million of our
trade accounts receivable under the ASA. Because the ASA matures in November 2011, we classified
the related debt as short-term on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The eligible amounts available
and beneficial interests sold were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Eligible amount available under the ASA on qualified accounts receivable |
|
$ |
94.0 |
|
|
$ |
100.0 |
|
Beneficial interest sold |
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining amount available |
|
$ |
44.0 |
|
|
$ |
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under the ASA, we pay certain discount fees to use the program and have the facility available
to us. These fees relate to both the used and unused portions of the securitization. The used fee
is based on the beneficial interest sold and calculated on the average floating commercial paper
rate determined by the purchaser of the beneficial interest, plus a program fee of 0.75%. The rate
as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was 1.06% for both periods. The unused fee is based on
102% of the maximum available amount less the beneficial interest sold and calculated at a 0.375%
fixed rate throughout the term of the agreement. We recorded these fees in Selling, General and
Administrative Expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. The amounts
recorded were as follows (in millions):
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Discount fees |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
The ASA contains certain restrictive covenants relating to the quality of our
accounts receivable and cross-default provisions with our domestic revolving credit facility and
senior unsecured notes. The administrative agent under the ASA is also a participant in our
domestic revolving credit facility. The participating financial institution has an investment grade
credit rating. We continue to evaluate its credit rating and have no reason to believe it will not
perform under the ASA. As of March 31, 2011, we were in compliance with all covenant requirements.
Long-Term Debt
Domestic Revolving Credit Facility
Under the $650 million domestic revolving credit facility, we had outstanding borrowings of
$271.5 million and $69.5 million committed to standby letters of credit as of March 31, 2011.
Subject to covenant limitations, $309.0 million was available for future borrowings. Included in
this facility is a subfacility for swingline loans of up to $50 million and provides for the
issuance of letters of credit for the full amount of the credit facility. The subfacility is fully
drawn and is included in our outstanding borrowings. This domestic revolving credit facility
matures in October 2012.
Our weighted average borrowing rate on the facility was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, |
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Weighted average borrowing rate |
|
|
1.05 |
% |
|
|
0.96 |
% |
Our domestic revolving credit facility contains financial covenants relating to leverage
and interest coverage. Other covenants contained in the domestic revolving credit facility
restrict, among other things, mergers, asset dispositions, guarantees, debt, liens, acquisitions,
investments, affiliate transactions and our ability to make restricted payments. The financial
covenants require us to maintain a defined Consolidated Indebtedness to Adjusted EBITDA Ratio and a
Cash Flow (defined as EBITDA minus capital expenditures) to Net Interest Expense Ratio. The
required ratios under our domestic revolving credit facility as of March 31, 2011 are detailed
below:
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Indebtedness to Adjusted EBITDA Ratio no greater than |
|
|
3.5 : 1.0 |
|
Cash Flow to Net Interest Expense Ratio no less than |
|
|
3.0 : 1.0 |
|
Our domestic revolving credit facility contains customary events of default. These events of
default include nonpayment of principal or interest, breach of covenants or other restrictions or
requirements, default on certain other indebtedness or receivables securitizations (cross default),
and bankruptcy. A cross default under our revolving credit facility could occur if:
|
|
|
We fail to pay any principal or interest when due on any other indebtedness or
receivables securitization of at least $40.0 million; or |
|
|
|
|
We are in default in the performance of, or compliance with any term of any other
indebtedness or receivables securitization in an aggregate principal amount of at
least $40.0 million, or any other condition exists which would give the holders the
right to declare such indebtedness due and payable prior to its stated maturity. |
Each of our major debt agreements contains provisions by which a default under one agreement
causes a default in the others (a cross default). If a cross default under the revolving credit
facility, our senior unsecured notes, or our revolving period asset securitization program were to
occur, it could have a wider impact on our liquidity than might otherwise occur from a default of a
single debt instrument or lease commitment.
If any event of default occurs and is continuing, lenders with a majority of the aggregate
commitments may require the administrative agent to terminate our right to borrow under our
domestic revolving credit facility and accelerate amounts due under our domestic revolving credit
facility (except for a bankruptcy event of default, in which case such amounts will automatically
become due and payable and the lenders commitments will
automatically terminate). As of March 31, 2011, we were in compliance with all covenant
requirements.
Senior Unsecured Notes
13
We issued $200.0 million of senior unsecured notes in May 2010 through a public offering. Interest is paid
semiannually on May 15 and November 15 at a fixed interest rate of 4.90% per annum. These notes mature on May 15, 2017.
The notes are guaranteed, on a senior unsecured basis, by each of our domestic
subsidiaries that guarantee payment by us of any indebtedness under our domestic revolving credit
facility. The indenture governing the notes contains covenants that, among other things, limit our
ability and the ability of the subsidiary guarantors to: create or incur certain liens; enter into
certain sale and leaseback transactions; enter into certain mergers, consolidations and transfers
of substantially all of our assets; and transfer certain properties. The indenture also contains a
cross default provision which is triggered if we default on other debt of at least $75 million in
principal which is then accelerated, and such acceleration is not rescinded within 30 days of the
notice date. As of March 31, 2011, we were in compliance with all covenant requirements and these
covenants have not changed from December 31, 2010.
Credit Rating
At March 31, 2011, our senior credit ratings were Baa3, with a stable outlook, and BBB-, with
a stable outlook by Moodys and Standard & Poors Rating Group (S&P), respectively.
Other Financing Arrangements
In the first quarter 2010, our captive insurance subsidiary entered into an agreement in which
cash was placed into a trust for the benefit of a third-party insurance provider. The purpose of
the trust is to pay workers compensation claims for policy years 2003 2009 until the liabilities
are fully extinguished. These policies were written by the third-party insurance provider, and
then reinsured by our captive insurance subsidiary. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we
had $10.5 million and $12.2 million in Restricted Cash on the accompanying Consolidated Balance
Sheets to pay these claims.
9. Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans:
The components of net periodic benefit cost were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Other Benefits |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
Amortization of net loss |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Settlements or curtailments |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net periodic pension cost |
|
$ |
4.4 |
|
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. Comprehensive Income:
The changes in the components of other comprehensive income, net of taxes, were as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(7.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.6 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net |
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
Derivatives, net of tax benefit of $2.6 and
$0.1 in 2011 and 2010, respectively |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
4.0 |
|
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. Stock-Based Compensation:
The Lennox International Inc. 2010 Incentive Plan, as amended and restated provides for various
long-term incentive awards, which include stock options, performance share units, restricted stock
units and stock appreciation rights. Net stock-based compensation expense recognized was as follows
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net stock-based compensation expense |
|
$ |
4.9 |
|
|
$ |
4.3 |
|
14
These expenses are included in Selling, General and Administrative Expenses in the
accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
12. Restructuring Charges:
As part of our strategic priorities of manufacturing and sourcing excellence and expense
reduction, we initiated various manufacturing rationalization actions designed to lower our cost
structure. We expanded these expense reductions across the organization by initiating a number of
activities to rationalize and reorganize various support and administrative functions.
Restructuring charges are not included in our calculation of segment (loss) profit, see Note 14 for
further discussion. Detailed below are the restructuring activities that we anticipate incurring
additional expense in 2011.
2010 Plans
Refrigeration
We began to exit certain Refrigeration manufacturing operations in Milperra, Australia in
2010, specifically our contract coil and OEM coil manufacturing. In the first quarter of 2010, we
began to exit the OEM coil manufacturing with total restructuring charges of $5.8 million composed
of $4.4 million in severance, $1.2 million in asset impairment charges, and $0.2 million in other
charges. This activity was substantially complete in 2010. We initiated the restructuring
activities related to exiting contract coil manufacturing in the third quarter of 2010. The total
restructuring charges related to this activity were $4.2 million composed of $3.1 million in
severance, $0.4 million in asset impairment and accelerated
depreciation, and $0.7 million in other charges. In the
first quarter of 2011, we recognized $0.5 million in other plant closure costs related to these
restructuring activities.
Service Experts
We began to reorganize certain administrative functions and the management structure of our
Service Experts business in 2010. We initiated two actions in 2010. The first action, started in
the second quarter of 2010, was to reorganize the administrative operations of an acquired company.
This project was completed in 2010. The second action, initiated in the fourth quarter of 2010,
was to reorganize the management structure of our Service Experts business. Expected restructuring
charges for this project are $1.5 million and consist principally of severance charges. We
anticipate this action to complete in the third quarter of 2011. We recognized $0.3 million in
lease termination and other costs in the first quarter of 2011.
2009 and Prior Plans
Refrigeration
In the fourth quarter of 2009, we began to consolidate certain Refrigeration manufacturing
operations located in Parets, Spain into our existing operations in Genas, France. This activity
had total restructuring charges of $8.5 million, consisting of
$6.1 million in severance, $1.2
million in asset impairment and equipment moves, and $1.1 million in other charges, and was substantially complete by
the fourth quarter of 2010.
Commercial Heating & Cooling
We completed the consolidation of certain manufacturing operations from Mions, France into our
Longvic, France operations in the first quarter of 2010. This activity had total restructuring
charges of $6.3 million which consist primarily of severance charges. We reversed $0.1 million in
severance charges in the first quarter of 2011 to adjust estimated charges to actual.
Additionally, included in our 2009 and Prior Plans was a reorganization of various administration
functions for the Commercial Heating & Cooling Segment.
Residential Heating & Cooling
15
Included in our 2009 and Prior Plans was a consolidation of our manufacturing operations from
Blackville,
South Carolina into our Orangeburg, South Carolina and Saltillo, Mexico operations. The
consolidation is expected to be complete by the fourth quarter of 2011 with expected total
restructuring charges of $14.2 million. These charges consist of $3.1 million in severance, $6.0
million in asset impairment and accelerated depreciation, and $5.2 million in other costs. We
recognized $0.3 million in restructuring charges in the first quarter of 2011 related to other
plant closure costs.
Regional Distribution Network
In the fourth quarter of 2008, we commenced the transition of activities performed at our
North American Parts Center in Des Moines, Iowa to other locations, including our North American
Distribution Center in Marshalltown, Iowa. To date, we incurred $3.2 million, primarily severance
costs, and we expect the total cost to be $3.6 million. The total costs of this project include
$2.7 million in severance costs, $0.3 million in moving
costs, and $0.3 million in other costs.
The transition is expected to complete by the fourth quarter of 2011.
Total Restructuring
Information regarding the restructuring charges for all plans is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Charges |
|
|
Charges |
|
|
Charges |
|
|
|
Incurred in |
|
|
Incurred to |
|
|
Expected to |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Date |
|
|
be Incurred |
|
Severance and related expense |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
50.6 |
|
|
$ |
51.0 |
|
Asset write-offs and accelerated depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
Equipment moves |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Lease termination |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
Other |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
71.3 |
|
|
$ |
75.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information regarding the restructuring charges by segment is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Charges |
|
|
Charges |
|
|
Charges |
|
|
|
Incurred in |
|
|
Incurred to |
|
|
Expected to |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Date |
|
|
be Incurred |
|
Residential Heating & Cooling |
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
$ |
16.0 |
|
|
$ |
18.9 |
|
Commercial Heating & Cooling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
Service Experts |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
Refrigeration |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
29.8 |
|
|
|
30.6 |
|
Corporate & Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
71.3 |
|
|
$ |
75.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring reserves are included in Accrued Expenses in the accompanying Consolidated
Balance Sheets. The table below details activity within the restructuring reserves for the first
quarter of 2011 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of |
|
|
Charged |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash |
|
|
Balance as of |
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
to |
|
|
Cash |
|
|
Utilization and |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Description of Reserves |
|
2010 |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Utilization |
|
|
Other |
|
|
2011 |
|
Severance and related expense |
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
(2.0 |
) |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
4.5 |
|
Asset write-offs and accelerated depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment moves |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease termination |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Other |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restructuring reserves |
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
(3.0 |
) |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
5.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. Loss Per Share:
Due to the net losses recorded in the first quarters of 2011 and 2010, both basic and diluted
net loss per share are computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common
shares outstanding during the period.
16
The computations of basic and diluted loss per share for Loss from Continuing Operations were
as follows (in millions, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(7.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.6 |
) |
Add: Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(7.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares outstanding basic and diluted |
|
|
53.6 |
|
|
|
56.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share from continuing operations basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not included in the 2011 and 2010 computations of diluted loss per share were 1,128,847 and
1,274,529 shares, respectively, of potentially dilutive securities, including stock options, stock
appreciation rights, restricted stock units and performance share units as these shares would be
anti-dilutive. These shares were anti-dilutive due to the loss position in both periods.
Additionally, stock appreciation rights were outstanding, but not included in the diluted loss
per share calculation because the assumed exercise of such rights would be anti-dilutive. The
details are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Number of shares |
|
|
464,314 |
|
|
|
555,628 |
|
Price per share |
|
$ |
46.78 |
|
|
$ |
36.94 |
|
14. Reportable Business Segments:
We operate in four reportable business segments of the heating, ventilation, air conditioning
and refrigeration (HVACR) industry. Our segments are organized primarily by the nature of the
products and services provided. The table below details the nature of the operations for each
reportable segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
Product or Services |
|
Markets Served |
|
Geographic Areas |
Residential Heating
& Cooling
|
|
Heating
Air Conditioning
Hearth Products
|
|
Residential Replacement
Residential New Construction
|
|
United States
Canada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Heating
& Cooling
|
|
Rooftop Products
Chillers
Air Handlers
|
|
Light Commercial
|
|
United States
Canada
Europe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service Experts
|
|
Equipment Sales
Installation
Maintenance
Repair
|
|
Residential
Light Commercial
|
|
United States
Canada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refrigeration
|
|
Unit Coolers
Condensing Units
Other Commercial
Refrigeration Products
Display Cases and Systems
|
|
Light Commercial
Food Preservation and
Non-Food/Industrial
|
|
United States
Canada
Europe
Asia Pacific
South America |
Transactions between segments, such as products sold to Service Experts by the
Residential Heating & Cooling segment, are recorded on an arms-length basis using the market price
for these products. The eliminations of these intercompany sales and any associated profit are
noted in the reconciliation of segment results to the income from continuing operations before
income taxes below.
We use segment profit or loss as the primary measure of profitability to evaluate operating
performance and to allocate capital resources. We define segment profit or loss as a segments
income or loss from continuing operations before income taxes included in the accompanying
Consolidated Statements of Operations:
17
|
|
|
Gains and/or losses and other expenses, net except for gains and/or
losses on the sale of fixed assets |
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and equity method investment impairments |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
|
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
|
Less amounts included in Gains and Other Expenses, net: |
|
|
|
Realized gains and/or losses on settled futures contracts |
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange gains and/or losses |
Our corporate costs include those costs related to corporate functions such as legal, internal
audit, treasury, human resources, tax compliance and senior executive staff. Corporate costs also
include the long-term share-based incentive awards provided to employees throughout LII. We
recorded these share-based awards as Corporate costs as they are determined at the discretion of
the Board of Directors and based on the historical practice of doing so for internal reporting
purposes.
Net sales and segment (loss) profit by business segment, along with a reconciliation of
segment (loss) profit to Loss from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes are shown below (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March, 31 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Heating & Cooling |
|
$ |
272.0 |
|
|
$ |
284.2 |
|
Commercial Heating & Cooling |
|
|
138.8 |
|
|
|
119.7 |
|
Service Experts |
|
|
116.5 |
|
|
|
127.1 |
|
Refrigeration |
|
|
175.1 |
|
|
|
131.4 |
|
Eliminations (1) |
|
|
(14.6 |
) |
|
|
(18.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
687.8 |
|
|
$ |
644.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment (Loss)Profit(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Heating & Cooling |
|
$ |
(1.2 |
) |
|
$ |
7.1 |
|
Commercial Heating & Cooling |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Service Experts |
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
Refrigeration |
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
Corporate and other |
|
|
(14.5 |
) |
|
|
(13.2 |
) |
Eliminations (1) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal that includes segment (loss) profit and
eliminations |
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
7.8 |
|
Reconciliation to loss from continuing operations before
income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Items in gains and other expenses, net that are
excluded from segment (loss) profit (3) |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
$ |
(11.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Eliminations consist of intercompany sales between business segments, such as products sold to Service
Experts by the Residential Heating & Cooling segment. |
18
|
|
|
(2) |
|
The Company defines segment profit and loss as a segments income or loss from continuing operations before
income taxes included in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations: |
|
|
|
Excluding: |
|
|
|
Special product quality adjustments. |
|
|
|
|
Items within Gains and/or losses and other expenses, net that are noted in (3). |
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charges. |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and equity method investment impairments. |
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net. |
|
|
|
|
Other expense, net. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Items in Gains and/or losses and other expenses, net that are excluded from segment profit or loss are net
change in unrealized gains and/or losses on open future contracts, discount fee on accounts sold, realized
gains and/or losses on marketable securities, special legal contingency charge, and other items. |
Total assets by business segment are shown below (in millions). The assets in the
Corporate segment are primarily comprised of cash and deferred tax assets. Assets recorded in the
operating segments represent those assets directly associated with those segments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Total Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Heating & Cooling |
|
$ |
606.4 |
|
|
$ |
519.8 |
|
Commercial Heating & Cooling |
|
|
270.5 |
|
|
|
252.7 |
|
Service Experts |
|
|
184.1 |
|
|
|
186.2 |
|
Refrigeration (2) |
|
|
577.2 |
|
|
|
389.7 |
|
Corporate and other |
|
|
271.1 |
|
|
|
354.9 |
|
Eliminations (1) |
|
|
(8.9 |
) |
|
|
(11.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,900.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,692.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Eliminations consist of net intercompany receivables and
intercompany profit included in inventory from products sold
between business segments, such as products sold to Service
Experts by the Residential Heating & Cooling segment. |
|
(2) |
|
The increase in Total assets for the Refrigeration segment is primarily related to the Kysor/Warren acquisition. See Note 3 for more information on this acquisition. |
15. Fair Value Measurements:
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following table presents the fair value hierarchy for those assets and liabilities
measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for |
|
|
|
Identical Assets (Level 1) |
|
|
|
As of March 31, |
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in marketable
equity securities
(1) |
|
$ |
17.0 |
|
|
$ |
18.0 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Investment in marketable equity securities is recorded in Other
Assets, net in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
Other Fair Value Measurements
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, net,
accounts payable and other current liabilities approximate fair value due to the short maturities
of these instruments. The fair values of each of our long-term debt instruments are based on the
quoted market prices for the same issues or on the amount of future cash flows associated with each
instrument using current market rates for debt instruments of similar maturities and credit risk. The fair values presented are estimates and are not
necessarily indicative of
19
amounts for which we could settle such instruments currently or
indicative of our intent or ability to dispose of or liquidate them. The estimated fair value of
our debt was as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, |
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Long-term debt (1) |
|
$ |
283.4 |
|
|
$ |
114.6 |
|
Senior unsecured notes |
|
|
210.7 |
|
|
|
203.0 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Long-term debt includes our domestic revolving credit facility,
capital lease obligations, foreign obligations and any related current
maturities. |
16. Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements
The Companys senior unsecured notes are unconditionally guaranteed by certain of the
Companys subsidiaries (the Guarantor Subsidiaries) while they are not by other subsidiaries (the
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries). As a result of the guarantee arrangements, we are required to
present the following condensed consolidating financial statements. During the first quarter of
2011, our guarantor and non-guarantor subsidiary structure changed as required by our credit
facility due to the Kysor/Warren acquisition. Three subsidiaries previously classified as
non-guarantor subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 are now classified as guarantor subsidiaries as
of March 31, 2011. These changes will be reflected in the condensed consolidating financial
statements for periods after December 31, 2010.
The condensed consolidating financial statements reflect the investments in subsidiaries of
the Company using the equity method of accounting. Intercompany account balances have been
included in Accounts and Notes Receivable, Other (Current) Assets, Other Assets, net, Short-Term
Debt, Accounts Payable, and Long-Term Debt line items of the Parent, Guarantor and Non-Guarantor
balance sheets. The principal elimination entries eliminate investments in subsidiaries and
intercompany balances and transactions.
Condensed consolidating financial statements of the Company, its Guarantor Subsidiaries and
Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and for the three months
ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 are shown below:
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
As of March 31, 2011
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Non-Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
ASSETS |
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13.8 |
|
|
$ |
41.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
55.2 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
Accounts and notes
receivable, net |
|
|
(886.2 |
) |
|
|
942.2 |
|
|
|
347.4 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
404.6 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
336.2 |
|
|
|
122.2 |
|
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
453.2 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
41.2 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
24.5 |
|
|
|
137.5 |
|
|
|
(91.7 |
) |
|
|
82.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
(869.8 |
) |
|
|
1,347.4 |
|
|
|
668.2 |
|
|
|
(98.8 |
) |
|
|
1,047.0 |
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND
EQUIPMENT, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
265.5 |
|
|
|
82.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
348.4 |
|
GOODWILL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
110.6 |
|
|
|
210.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
321.3 |
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
78.8 |
|
|
|
24.1 |
|
|
|
(12.8 |
) |
|
|
88.6 |
|
OTHER ASSETS, net |
|
|
2,062.6 |
|
|
|
410.4 |
|
|
|
37.6 |
|
|
|
(2,415.5 |
) |
|
|
95.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
1,191.3 |
|
|
$ |
2,212.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,023.5 |
|
|
$ |
(2,527.1 |
) |
|
$ |
1,900.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
35.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
$ |
(35.3 |
) |
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
Asset
securitization borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
Current maturities of
long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
221.2 |
|
|
|
97.5 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
340.8 |
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
238.5 |
|
|
|
95.2 |
|
|
|
(61.5 |
) |
|
|
281.8 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
(17.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
72.1 |
|
|
|
442.8 |
|
|
|
245.2 |
|
|
|
(83.5 |
) |
|
|
676.6 |
|
LONG-TERM DEBT |
|
|
471.5 |
|
|
|
21.9 |
|
|
|
127.5 |
|
|
|
(132.4 |
) |
|
|
488.5 |
|
POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS, OTHER
THAN PENSIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
PENSIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
78.0 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
88.7 |
|
OTHER LIABILITIES |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
55.4 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
(12.9 |
) |
|
|
64.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
548.7 |
|
|
|
613.9 |
|
|
|
400.1 |
|
|
|
(228.7 |
) |
|
|
1,334.0 |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
642.6 |
|
|
|
1,598.8 |
|
|
|
623.4 |
|
|
|
(2,298.4 |
) |
|
|
566.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
1,191.3 |
|
|
$ |
2,212.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,023.5 |
|
|
$ |
(2,527.1 |
) |
|
$ |
1,900.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
NET SALES |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
515.9 |
|
|
$ |
216.5 |
|
|
$ |
(44.6 |
) |
|
$ |
687.8 |
|
COST OF GOODS SOLD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
402.8 |
|
|
|
165.4 |
|
|
|
(45.6 |
) |
|
|
522.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
113.1 |
|
|
|
51.1 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
165.2 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
127.7 |
|
|
|
46.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
173.9 |
|
Losses (gains) and other expenses, net |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Loss (income) from equity method investments |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational (loss) income from continuing operations |
|
|
(7.1 |
) |
|
|
(15.5 |
) |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
INTEREST EXPENSE (INCOME), net |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations before
income taxes |
|
|
(11.1 |
) |
|
|
(14.7 |
) |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
(11.1 |
) |
(BENEFIT FROM) PROVISIONS FOR INCOME TAXES |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
|
|
(9.7 |
) |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(9.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(9.7 |
) |
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
|
$ |
8.4 |
|
|
$ |
(7.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
As of December 31, 2010
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
ASSETS |
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
81.1 |
|
|
$ |
14.7 |
|
|
$ |
64.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
160.0 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
Accounts and notes receivable, net |
|
|
(1,169.7 |
) |
|
|
933.3 |
|
|
|
613.2 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
384.8 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
163.7 |
|
|
|
128.7 |
|
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
|
|
286.2 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.6 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
36.7 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
|
121.2 |
|
|
|
(94.5 |
) |
|
|
67.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
(1,069.3 |
) |
|
|
1,160.3 |
|
|
|
951.6 |
|
|
|
(95.7 |
) |
|
|
946.9 |
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
202.8 |
|
|
|
121.6 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
324.3 |
|
GOODWILL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.8 |
|
|
|
225.8 |
|
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
271.8 |
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
77.3 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
|
|
|
(12.7 |
) |
|
|
87.2 |
|
OTHER ASSETS, net |
|
|
2,068.3 |
|
|
|
415.6 |
|
|
|
51.8 |
|
|
|
(2,473.9 |
) |
|
|
61.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
|
$ |
999.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,906.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,373.4 |
|
|
$ |
(2,587.2 |
) |
|
$ |
1,692.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
31.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
$ |
(31.5 |
) |
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
133.1 |
|
|
|
131.0 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
273.8 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
262.0 |
|
|
|
115.5 |
|
|
|
(49.6 |
) |
|
|
334.5 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
(36.1 |
) |
|
|
30.6 |
|
|
|
28.3 |
|
|
|
(17.5 |
) |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
425.9 |
|
|
|
277.0 |
|
|
|
(97.0 |
) |
|
|
615.6 |
|
LONG-TERM DEBT |
|
|
300.0 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
139.6 |
|
|
|
(128.0 |
) |
|
|
317.0 |
|
POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS, OTHER THAN
PENSIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
PENSIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
77.4 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88.1 |
|
OTHER LIABILITIES |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
46.8 |
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
(12.8 |
) |
|
|
65.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
315.5 |
|
|
|
571.4 |
|
|
|
453.2 |
|
|
|
(237.8 |
) |
|
|
1,102.3 |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
683.5 |
|
|
|
1,335.4 |
|
|
|
920.2 |
|
|
|
(2,349.4 |
) |
|
|
589.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
$ |
999.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,906.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,373.4 |
|
|
$ |
(2,587.2 |
) |
|
$ |
1,692.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
NET SALES |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
429.4 |
|
|
$ |
274.2 |
|
|
$ |
(59.5 |
) |
|
$ |
644.1 |
|
COST OF GOODS SOLD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
322.7 |
|
|
|
206.5 |
|
|
|
(59.4 |
) |
|
|
469.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
106.7 |
|
|
|
67.7 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
174.3 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
116.4 |
|
|
|
52.6 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
168.9 |
|
(Gains) losses and
other expenses, net |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Restructuring charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
Loss (Income) from
equity method
investments |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
(7.7 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational
(loss) income
from continuing
operations |
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
(14.5 |
) |
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
INTEREST (INCOME)
EXPENSE, net |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income
from continuing
operations
before income
taxes |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
(16.4 |
) |
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
PROVISIONS FOR (BENEFIT
FROM) INCOME TAXES |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income
from continuing
operations |
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
(11.4 |
) |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
Loss from discontinued
operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(4.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(11.4 |
) |
|
$ |
6.7 |
|
|
$ |
7.6 |
|
|
$ |
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
$ |
59.7 |
|
|
$ |
(131.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(77.0 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(148.3 |
) |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the disposal of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
Acquisition of business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(136.3 |
) |
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(144.2 |
) |
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(143.0 |
) |
|
|
(7.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150.1 |
) |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Asset securitization borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
Long-term payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Revolver long-term borrowings, net |
|
|
171.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171.5 |
|
Proceeds from stock option exercises |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(24.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24.7 |
) |
Excess tax benefits related to share-based payments |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Intercompany debt |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany financing activity |
|
|
(283.4 |
) |
|
|
275.6 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(140.8 |
) |
|
|
273.1 |
|
|
|
59.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191.8 |
|
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(81.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(24.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106.6 |
) |
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year |
|
|
81.1 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
64.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13.8 |
|
|
$ |
41.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
55.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
$ |
(53.0 |
) |
|
$ |
32.4 |
|
|
$ |
(19.7 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(40.3 |
) |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(8.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.7 |
) |
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Acquisition of business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
Restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
(30.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39.3 |
) |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Long-term payments |
|
|
(35.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35.1 |
) |
Revolver long-term payments, net |
|
|
93.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93.0 |
|
Proceeds from stock option exercises |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Repurchases of common stock |
|
|
(39.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39.4 |
) |
Excess tax benefits related to share-based payments |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Intercompany debt |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany financing activity |
|
|
38.5 |
|
|
|
(27.5 |
) |
|
|
(11.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany investments |
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany dividends |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing
activities |
|
|
52.6 |
|
|
|
(22.3 |
) |
|
|
(14.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
(64.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63.8 |
) |
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATES ON CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
116.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year |
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
8.0 |
|
|
$ |
54.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
63.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, that are based on information currently available to management as well as
managements assumptions and beliefs. All statements, other than statements of historical fact,
included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q constitute forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including but not limited to
statements identified by the words may, will, should, plan, predict, anticipate,
believe, intend, estimate and expect and similar expressions. Such statements reflect our
current views with respect to future events, based on what we believe are reasonable assumptions;
however, such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties. In addition to the
specific uncertainties discussed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the risk factors
set forth in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2010, and those set forth in Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors of this report, if any,
may affect our performance and results of operations. Should one or more of these risks or
uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may
differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. We disclaim any intention or
obligation to update or review any forward-looking statements or information, whether as a result
of new information, future events or otherwise.
Overview
We operate in four reportable business segments of the HVACR industry. Our reportable
segments consist of Residential Heating & Cooling, Commercial Heating & Cooling, Service Experts
and Refrigeration. For more detailed information regarding our reportable segments, see Note 14 in
the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Our products and services are sold through a combination of distributors, independent and
company-owned dealer service centers, other installing contractors, wholesalers, manufacturers
representatives, original equipment manufacturers and to national accounts. The demand for our
products and services is seasonal and dependent on the weather. Warmer than normal summer
temperatures generate strong demand for replacement air conditioning and refrigeration products and
services and colder than normal winter temperatures have the same effect on heating products and
services. Conversely, cooler than normal summers and warmer than normal winters depress the demand
for HVACR products and services. In addition to weather, demand for our products and services is
influenced by national and regional economic and demographic factors, such as interest rates, the
availability of financing, regional population and employment trends, new construction, general
economic conditions and consumer spending habits and confidence.
The principal elements of cost of goods sold in our manufacturing operations are components,
raw materials, factory overhead, labor and estimated costs of warranty expense. The principal
raw materials used in our manufacturing processes are steel, copper and aluminum. In recent years,
increased prices for these commodities and related components have challenged us and the HVACR
industry in general. We seek to mitigate the impact of higher commodity prices through a
combination of price increases for our products and services, commodity contracts, improved
production efficiency and cost reduction initiatives. We also seek to mitigate volatility in the
prices of these commodities by entering into futures contracts and fixed forward contracts. In our
Service Experts segment, the principal components of cost of goods sold are equipment, parts and
supplies and labor.
A substantial portion of the sales in each of our business segments is attributable to
replacement business, with the balance comprised of new construction business.
The Residential Heating & Cooling business was impacted in the first quarter of 2011 by
pull-forward of demand in the fourth quarter of 2010 ahead of announced price increases.
These items
combined for a 10% volume decline in net sales for this business when compared to the prior year
quarter. We were able to offset the sales volume decline with a 5% increase in price and mix. The
Service Experts business also experienced a sales volume decline in our seasonally lightest
quarter. Our Commercial Heating & Cooling business showed strong growth in the quarter with 16%
revenue growth, largely driven by volume. The Refrigeration segment experienced a 33% increase in
net sales. We had organic growth of 3%, excluding a 5% impact of foreign currency exchange rates,
with the remainder of the growth from the acquisition of the Kysor/Warren business in January 2011.
27
We will continue to execute on our strategic priorities to win new business and capture
opportunities through innovative product and system solutions and lower our cost structure through
manufacturing and sourcing excellence and expense reduction efforts. As we move into the strongest
seasonal quarters of the year, we believe we are well-positioned across all our businesses.
Key Financial Statistics
|
|
|
Net sales for first quarter of 2011 increased to $687.8 million as compared to $644.1
million in 2010. The Kysor/Warren acquisition contributed 5% to the net sales growth with
the remainder of the increase due to favorable foreign currency exchange rates. |
|
|
|
|
Operational income for first quarter of 2011 declined to a $7.0 million loss as compared
to operational income of $0.5 million in 2010. The decline to an operational loss in 2011
was primarily due to gross profit compression from commodity headwinds and an increase in
freight costs. |
|
|
|
|
Net loss for the first quarter of 2011 was $7.2 million compared to a net loss of $1.6
million in 2010. Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations were $0.13 in
the first quarter of 2011 compared to basic and diluted loss per share from continuing
operations of $0.02 in 2010. |
|
|
|
|
Cash of $148.3 million was used in operating activities for first quarter of 2011
compared to cash used in operating activities of $40.3 million in the first quarter of
2010. Cash used in operating activities was higher primarily due to the increased build of
inventory levels in the first quarter of 2011. |
|
|
|
|
During the first quarter of 2011, we returned $31.8 million to shareholders through
share repurchases and dividends. Our dividends increased in the first quarter of 2011 to
$0.15 per share from $0.14 per share in 2010. |
Results of Operations
The following table provides a summary of our financial results, including information
presented as a percentage of net sales (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Percent Sales |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Fav/(Unfav) |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
687.8 |
|
|
$ |
644.1 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of goods sold |
|
|
522.6 |
|
|
|
469.8 |
|
|
|
(11.2 |
) |
|
|
76.0 |
|
|
|
72.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
165.2 |
|
|
|
174.3 |
|
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
27.1 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
173.9 |
|
|
|
168.9 |
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
25.2 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
|
Gains and other expenses, net |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
N.M |
|
|
|
N.M |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
83.3 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Income from equity method
investments |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational (loss) income |
|
$ |
(7.0 |
) |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
|
(1,500.0 |
)% |
|
|
(1.0 |
)% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(7.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(350.0 |
)% |
|
|
(1.0 |
)% |
|
|
(0.2 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter of 2011 Compared to First Quarter of 2010 Consolidated Results
Net Sales
Net sales increased 7% in the first quarter of 2011 compared to the first quarter of 2010. The
Kysor/Warren acquisition added 5% to our net sales. Our price and mix were up 3% in the comparable
period; however, our sales volume was down 1%. The decline in volume was predominantly in our
residential segment partially offset by volume growth in our commercial and refrigeration segments.
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates favorably impacted net sales by 2%.
28
Gross Profit
Gross
profit margins declined 310 basis points to 24.0% for the first quarter of 2011 when
compared to gross profit margins of 27.1% in 2010. Commodity headwinds contributed approximately
180 basis points to the decline which was partially offset by improved price and mix of 110 basis
points. Contributing to the decline in gross profit margins were
other cost changes contributing 50
basis points and foreign currency translation rates 110 basis points. The other costs changes
decline was primarily due to an increase in freight charges primarily from rate increases and fuel
surcharges.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses increased by $5 million in the first
quarter of 2011 compared to 2010; however, as a percentage of net sales, SG&A expenses declined to
25% in 2011 from 26% in 2010. SG&A expenses excluding the Kysor/Warren acquisition were
relatively flat. The impact of changes in foreign exchange rates increased SG&A expenses by $2
million. Offsetting the effects of foreign currency exchange rates were $1 million in favorable
bad debt experience and $1 million in lower commissions primarily due to lower sales in our
residential segment.
Gains and Other Expenses, Net
Gains and other expenses, net for the first quarters of 2011 and 2010 included the following
(in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Realized gains losses on settled futures contracts |
|
$ |
(0.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
Unrealized loss on unsettled futures contracts
not designated as cash flow hedges |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange loss (gains) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Acquisition expenses |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other items, net |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains and other expenses, net |
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in gains and losses on futures contracts was primarily due to increases in
commodity prices relative to our futures contract prices during 2011 as compared to 2010 for the
contracts that settled during the period. Conversely, the change in unrealized losses related to
unsettled futures contracts not designated as cash flow hedges was primarily due to higher
commodity prices relative to the futures contract prices for those contracts. For more
information, see Note 5 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Restructuring Charges
Restructuring charges declined from $7.2 million in the first quarter of 2010 to $1.2 million
in the first quarter of 2011. As we didnt initiate any new projects in the first quarter of 2011,
the charges in this period related to minor charges from various open projects initiated in prior
years. The restructuring charges from the first quarter of 2010 were primarily related to the exit
of coil manufacturing in Milperra, Australia which was initiated in that quarter. This
restructuring project resulted in $5.8 million in restructuring charges consisting of $4.4 million
in severance, $1.2 million in asset impairments, and $0.2 million in other charges. The remaining
restructuring charges from the first quarter of 2010 were minor charges from various open projects
initiated in prior years.
Results from Equity Method and Other Equity Investments
Investments over which we do not exercise control but have significant influence are accounted
for using the equity method of accounting. Income from equity method investments increased to $2.6
million in the first quarter of 2011 from $2.0 million in 2010,
primarily from improved performance from
our compressor manufacturing joint venture.
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net, increased to $4.1 million in 2011 from $2.5 million in 2010. The
increase in interest expense was primarily attributable to an increase in our weighted average
interest rate as well as an increase in the average amounts borrowed in the first quarter of 2011
compared to 2010.
29
Benefit from Income Taxes
The income tax benefits were
$3.9 million in the first quarter of 2011 compared $0.7 million
in 2010. The effective tax rate was 35.1% for 2011 and 35.0% in 2010. Our effective rates differ
from the statutory federal rate of 35% for certain items, such as state and local taxes,
non-deductible expenses, foreign operating losses for which no tax benefits have been recognized
and foreign taxes at rates other than 35%. In the first quarters of 2011 and 2010, these items
effectively offset each other and did not affect our effective tax rates.
First Quarter of 2011 Compared to First Quarter of 2010 Results by Segment
Residential Heating & Cooling
The following table summarizes our Residential Heating & Cooling segments net sales and
(loss) profit for the first quarters of 2011 and 2010 (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Difference |
|
|
% Change |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
272.0 |
|
|
$ |
284.2 |
|
|
$ |
(12.2 |
) |
|
|
(4.3 |
)% |
(Loss) profit |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
(8.3 |
) |
|
|
(116.9 |
)% |
% of net sales |
|
|
(0.4 |
)% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in sales was impacted by the pull-forward of demand into the fourth quarter of
2010 ahead of announced price increases. Sales volumes
declined by almost 10% in 2011 as compared to 2010. Partially offsetting the decline in sales
volume was higher price and mix of 5% and foreign currency exchange rates of 1%.
Segment profit decreased $8 million due to $11 million in lower sales volumes and $8 million
in higher freight charges. Commodity headwinds of $8 million
were more than offset by $12 million
in favorable price and mix. Other product cost savings of $5 million, primarily from material
savings and lower SG&A expense of $2 million, partially offset the decline in segment profit. The
lower SG&A expenses were the result of $1 million in favorable bad debt experience and $1 million
in lower commissions due to the decline in net sales.
Commercial Heating & Cooling
The following table summarizes our Commercial Heating & Cooling segments net sales and profit
for the first quarters of 2011 and 2010 (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Difference |
|
|
% Change |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
138.8 |
|
|
$ |
119.7 |
|
|
$ |
19.1 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
% |
Profit |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
73.5 |
|
% of net sales |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Commercial Heating & Cooling business experienced 16% in higher net sales in the first
quarter of 2011 compared to 2010 primarily due to an increase in both our commercial new
construction and replacement businesses which resulted in a 15% increase in sales volume.
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates favorably impacted sales
by 1%.
Segment profit for the first quarter of 2011 increased almost $3 million from the first
quarter of 2010. Segment profit increased from the impact of higher sales volume of $5 million.
Partially offsetting our higher sales were commodity headwinds of $2 million and freight charges of
$1 million. The increase in freight charges is primarily related to an increase in fuel
surcharges.
Service Experts
The following table summarizes our Service Experts segments net sales and loss for the first
quarters of 2011 and 2010 (dollars in millions):
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Difference |
|
|
% Change |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
116.5 |
|
|
$ |
127.1 |
|
|
$ |
(10.6 |
) |
|
|
(8.3 |
)% |
Loss |
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
78.3 |
|
% of net sales |
|
|
(7.0 |
)% |
|
|
(3.6 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In total, sales volumes declined 11% which was partially offset by a 2% increase in price and
mix. Foreign currency exchange rates increased net sales by 1%.
In the seasonally lightest quarter, segment loss increased $4 million due to the impact of the
volume decline in net sales. Partially offsetting the volume decline was an SG&A expense
improvement of $2 million due to $1 million in favorable bad debt experience and $1 million in
lower commissions due to the decline in net sales.
Refrigeration
The following table summarizes our Refrigeration segments net sales and profit for the first
quarters of 2011 and 2010 (dollars in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Difference |
|
|
% Change |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
175.1 |
|
|
$ |
131.4 |
|
|
$ |
43.7 |
|
|
|
33.3 |
% |
Profit |
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
% of net sales |
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
sales, excluding Kysor/Warren, increased 3% due to higher sales volumes. Price and mix
were relatively flat. Foreign exchange rates increased net sales by an additional 4%. The
Kysor/Warren acquisition contributed 26% to the increase in net sales.
Segment
profit decreased by $1 million from commodity headwinds and $1 million in increased
freight charges. The increase in freight charges was due to an increase in rates and fuel
surcharges. Offsetting these decreases to segment profit was a favorable impact from foreign
currency exchange rates of $1 million.
Corporate and Other
Corporate and other expenses were $15 million in the first quarter of 2011, up from $13
million in 2010. The increase was primarily driven by a $1 million pension settlement and a $1
million increase in stock-based and incentive compensation plans.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our working capital and capital expenditure requirements are generally met through internally
generated funds, bank lines of credit and a revolving period asset securitization arrangement.
Working capital needs are generally greater in the first and second quarters due to the seasonal
nature of our business cycle.
Statement of Cash Flows
The following table summarizes our cash activity for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and
2010 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
$ |
(148.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(40.3 |
) |
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(150.1 |
) |
|
|
(39.3 |
) |
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
191.8 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
31
Net Cash Used in by Operating Activities
Operating activities resulted in a higher use of cash in 2011 compared to 2010. This
increased use was primarily due to higher working capital requirements in 2011 and a higher
incentive payout in 2011 from improved operating results in 2010. Our working capital requirements
resulted in a $69.5 million use of cash in the first quarter of 2011 compared to a $32.6 million
use of cash in 2010. The increase in working capital requirements is primarily due to a larger
increase in inventory of $136.3 million in the first quarter of 2011 compared to $85.6 million in
2010. As we prepare for the peak cooling season, we carry higher than average inventory balances
in the first and second quarters. Our increases in inventory in the first quarter of 2011 were
larger than 2010 primarily due to anticipated sales growth across all business segments in 2011.
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities for the first quarter of 2011 included $144.2 million
for the acquisition of the Kysor/Warren business from The Manitowoc Company. Kysor/Warren is a
leading manufacturer of refrigerated systems and display cases for supermarkets throughout North
America and will be included in our Refrigeration Segment.
Capital expenditures in the first quarter of 2011 were $8.2 million, which was slightly lower
than the $10.7 million in the first quarter of 2010. Capital expenditures in the quarter were
primarily related to maintenance capital expenditures.
In addition to the $10.7 million in capital expenditures, net cash used in investing
activities for the first quarter of 2010 included $25.1 million placed in a trust for our captive
insurance subsidiary and $6.7 million for business acquisitions. Offsetting these uses were $3.2
million in proceeds from the sale of businesses.
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities increased by $176.0 million in the first quarter of
2011 compared to the first quarter of 2010. This increase was primarily related to an increase in
net borrowings to support the Kysor/Warren acquisition and the increase in working capital needs in
the first quarter of 2011. Additionally, we had lower share repurchase activity in the first
quarter of 2011 of $23.7 million compared to $34.7 million in the first quarter of 2010 which
contributed to the increase in net cash provided by financing activities. Offsetting these
increases was an increase in our cash dividend from $0.14 per share in the first quarter of 2010 to
$0.15 per share in the first quarter of 2011.
Debt Position and Financial Leverage
The following table details our lines of credit and financing arrangements as of March 31,
2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Available for |
|
|
|
Maximum Capacity |
|
|
Borrowings |
|
|
Future Borrowings |
|
Short-Term Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Committed |
|
$ |
10.9 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10.9 |
|
Non-committed |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Securitization (1) |
|
|
94.0 |
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
44.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term debt |
|
$ |
107.6 |
|
|
$ |
52.7 |
|
|
$ |
54.9 |
|
Long-Term Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
17.4 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic revolving credit facility (2) |
|
|
650.0 |
|
|
|
271.5 |
|
|
|
309.0 |
|
Senior unsecured notes |
|
|
200.0 |
|
|
|
200.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
867.4 |
|
|
$ |
488.9 |
|
|
|
309.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
975.0 |
|
|
$ |
541.6 |
|
|
$ |
363.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The maximum capacity under the asset securitization arrangement (ASA) is the lesser
of $100.0 million or 100% of the net pool balance defined under the ASA. |
|
(2) |
|
The available future borrowings on our domestic revolving credit facility exclude $69.5
million in standby letters of credit. |
As discussed above,
we utilized our domestic revolving credit facility (credit facility) and
ASA to support the acquisition of the Kysor/Warren
business and the increase in working capital needs in the first quarter of 2011.
32
As our peak season arrives, we typically pay down debt. We believe our available
future borrowings combined with our cash of $55.2 million and anticipated cash from operations in
the latter half of the year will be more than sufficient to fund our operations, capital
expenditures, share repurchases, dividends and other needs in the foreseeable future.
Our expected capital expenditures are $65 million for 2011.
Our debt-to-total-capital ratio increased to 48.9% at March 31, 2011 compared to 35.1% at
December 31, 2010. Lower stockholders equity was primarily due to the repurchase of approximately
0.5 million shares of our common stock for $23.7 million since December 31, 2010 under our current
share repurchase plan. The increase in debt since December 31, 2010 was principally due to the
acquisition of the Kysor/Warren business as well as our increase in working capital needs.
Covenants on our outstanding debt did not change in the first quarter of 2011 and we were in
compliance with all of our debt covenants as of March 31, 2011. For a more detailed discussion of
our debt, see Note 8 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Part I,
Item I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
We periodically review our capital structure, including our primary bank facility, to ensure
that it has adequate liquidity. Our ASA expires on November 18, 2011 and our credit facility
matures in October 2012. We expect to amend, renew or replace these facilities prior to or upon
their expiration. We also periodically consider various other financing alternatives and may, from
time to time, seek to take advantage of favorable interest rate environments or other market
conditions, which may include accessing the capital markets. We filed a shelf registration
statement with the SEC that became effective on December 1, 2008, which allows us to offer and sell
an indeterminate number or amount of debt securities, common shares, preferred shares, subscription
rights, warrants, depositary shares and units.
On March 11, 2011, we announced that our Board of Directors approved a 20% increase in our
quarterly dividend on common stock from $0.15 to $0.18 effective with the April dividend payment.
Dividend payments are expected to be approximately $35 million in 2011. We also continue to
increase shareholder value through our share repurchase program. During the quarter we returned
$23.7 million to our investors through share repurchases. We are targeting in excess of $100.0
million in share repurchases in 2011.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
In addition to the credit facilities and promissory notes described above, we also lease real
estate and machinery and equipment pursuant to operating leases that are not capitalized on the
balance sheet, including high-turnover equipment such as autos and service vehicles and short-lived
equipment such as personal computers.
Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees
For a detailed discussion of commitments, contingencies and guarantees, see Note 7 in the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The estimate of our liability for future warranty costs requires us to make significant
assumptions about the amount, timing and nature of the costs we will incur in the future. We review
the assumptions used to determine the liability periodically and we adjust our assumptions based
upon factors such as actual failure rates and cost experience. Numerous factors could affect actual
failure rates and cost experience, including the amount and timing of new product introductions,
changes in manufacturing techniques or locations, components or suppliers used. In recent years,
changes in the warranty liability as the result of the issuance of new warranties and the payments
made have remained relatively stable. Should actual warranty costs differ from our estimates, we
may be required to record adjustments to accruals and expense in the future. At the end of each
accounting period, we evaluate our warranty liabilities and during the second quarter of each year,
we perform a complete reevaluation of our warranty liabilities.
We also may incur costs related to our products that may not be covered under our warranties
and are not covered by insurance, and we may, from time to time, repair or replace installed
products experiencing quality
33
issues in order to satisfy our customers and to protect our brand. These product quality
issues may be caused by vendor-supplied components that fail to meet required specifications. We
have identified a product quality issue in a heating and cooling product line produced in 2006 and
2007 period that we believe results from a vendor-supplied materials quality issue. To date, we
recorded an expense of $24.4 million for the portion of the issue that is probable and can be
reasonably estimated. No material charges were recorded for this matter in the first quarter of
2011. As of March 31, 2011, we had $14.0 million accrued for this matter. We may incur
additional charges in the future as more information becomes available.
We estimate the costs to settle pending litigation based on experience involving similar
claims and specific facts known. We do not believe that any current or pending or threatened
litigation will have a material adverse effect on our financial position. Litigation and
arbitration, however, involve uncertainties and it is possible that the eventual outcome of
litigation could adversely affect our results of operations for a particular period. We are the
defendant in a class action lawsuit related to certain hearth products we produced and sold that
claims such products are hazardous and that consumers were not adequately warned. On August 23,
2010, the Company and the plaintiffs entered into a binding Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and
have reached tentative terms for settlement of the case. On January 11, 2011, the court granted
preliminary approval of the settlement. At the parties request, the court stayed the lawsuit
shortly after the MOU was signed. The court set June 2, 2011 as the date for the final approval
hearing. We had $9.3 million in expenses to date related to this matter with no additional charges
during the first quarter of 2011.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Commodity Price Risk
We enter into commodity futures contracts to stabilize prices expected to be paid for raw
materials and parts containing high copper and aluminum content. These contracts are for quantities
equal to or less than quantities expected to be consumed in future production.
Fluctuations in metal commodity prices impact the value of the derivative instruments that we
hold. When metal commodity prices rise, the fair value of our futures contracts increases and
conversely, when commodity prices fall, the fair value of our futures contracts decreases.
Information about our exposure to market risks related to metal commodity prices and a
sensitivity analysis related to our metal commodity hedges is presented below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amount (pounds) |
|
|
24.1 |
|
Carrying amount and fair value of asset |
|
$ |
12.0 |
|
Change in fair value from 10% change in forward prices |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
Interest Rate Risk
Our results of operations can be affected by changes in interest rates due to variable rates
of interest on our revolving credit facilities, cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments.
In order to partially mitigate interest rate risk, we use a hedging strategy to eliminate the
variability of cash flows in the interest payments for the first $100 million of the total
variable-rate debt outstanding under the domestic revolving credit facility that is solely due to
changes in the benchmark interest rate. This strategy allows us to fix a portion of our interest
payments while also taking advantage of historically low interest rates.
On June 12, 2009, we entered into a $100 million pay-fixed, receive-variable interest rate
swap with a large financial institution at a fixed interest rate of 2.66%. The variable portion of
the interest rate swap is tied to 1-Month LIBOR (the benchmark interest rate). The interest rates
under both the interest rate swap and the underlying debt are reset, the swap is settled with the
counterparty, and interest is paid, on a monthly basis. The interest rate swap expires October 12,
2012. We account for the interest rate swap as a cash flow hedge.
Information about our exposure to interest rate risk and a sensitivity analysis related to our
interest rate swap is presented below (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amount |
|
$ |
100.0 |
|
Impact of a 100 basis point change in the benchmark interest rate: |
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount and fair value of liability |
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
34
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
Our results of operations can be affected by changes in exchange rates. Net sales and
expenses in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes
based on the average exchange rate for the period. For the first quarters of 2011 and 2010, net
sales from outside the U.S. represented 30.5% and 30.0%, respectively, of our total net sales.
Historically, foreign currency transaction gains (losses) have not had a material effect on our
overall operations. As of March 31, 2011, the impact to net income of a 10% change in exchange
rates is estimated to be approximately $0.3 million.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we carried out an
evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our current management, including
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. There are inherent
limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the
possibility of human error and circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures.
Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable
assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of March 31, 2011, our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to
be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the applicable
rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, there were no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
35
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
On February 6, 2008, a class action lawsuit was filed against us in the U.S. District Court
for the Northern District of California styled Keilholtz v. Lennox Hearth Products, Lennox
Industries and Lennox International, Inc. The lawsuit, which involves no personal injury claims,
alleges that certain of our single-pane, glass-front, gas fireplaces are hazardous and that
consumers were not adequately warned, and seeks economic damages. On February 16, 2010, the court
issued an order certifying a nationwide class of plaintiffs.
On August 23, 2010, the Company and the plaintiffs entered into a binding Memorandum of
Understanding in this case and have reached tentative terms for settlement of the case. At the
parties request, the court stayed the lawsuit shortly after the MOU was signed. On January 11,
2011, the court granted preliminary approval of the settlement. The court set June 2, 2011 as the
date for the final approval hearing.
Other than the lawsuit described above, there have been no significant changes concerning our
legal proceedings since December 31, 2010. See Note 7 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements set forth in Part I, Item 1, of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for additional
discussion regarding legal proceedings.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, you
should carefully consider the risk factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, which could materially affect our
business, financial condition or results of operations. There have been no material changes to our
risk factors from those disclosed in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
In June 2008 our Board of Directors approved a new share repurchase plan for $300 million,
pursuant to which we are authorized to repurchase shares of our common stock through open market
purchases (the 2008 Share Repurchase Plan). The 2008 Share Repurchase Program has no stated
expiration date. In the first quarter of 2011, we repurchased shares of our common stock as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Shares that
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased |
|
|
may yet be Purchased |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Paid per |
|
|
As Part of Publicly |
|
|
Under the Plans or |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Share |
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
Programs |
|
Period |
|
Purchased(1) |
|
|
(including fees) |
|
|
or Programs |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
January 1 through January 31 |
|
|
2,097 |
|
|
$ |
49.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
141.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 1 through February 28 |
|
|
408,295 |
|
|
$ |
50.85 |
|
|
|
391,500 |
|
|
$ |
121.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 1 through March 31 |
|
|
79,457 |
|
|
$ |
48.72 |
|
|
|
77,800 |
|
|
$ |
117.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
489,849 |
|
|
$ |
50.50 |
|
|
|
469,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
This column reflects the repurchases of 469,300 shares under the 2008
Share Repurchase Plan and the surrender to LII of 20,549 shares of
common stock to satisfy tax-withholding obligations in connection with
the vesting of restricted stock and performance share units. |
36
Item 6. Exhibits.
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Lennox International Inc. (LII) (filed as
Exhibit 3.1 to LIIs Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration Statement No.
333-75725) filed on April 6, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of LII (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to LIIs Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on March 15, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen Stock Certificate for the Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, of LII
(filed as Exhibit 4.1 to LIIs Amendment to Registration Statement on Form S-1/A
(Registration No. 333-75725) filed on June 16, 1999 and incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Indenture, dated as of May 3,
2010, between LII and U.S. Bank National
Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.3 to LIIs
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on S-3 (Registration No.
333-155796)). |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Form of First Supplemental Indenture among LII, the guarantors party thereto
and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11 to
LIIs Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement on S-3 (Registration
No. 333-155796)). |
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 28, 2011, among Heatcraft Inc., a
Mississippi corporation, Heatcraft Refrigeration Products LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company and Advanced Distributor Products LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the
Guarantors), LII, and each other then existing Guarantor under the Indenture dated as of
May 3, 2010, and U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Form of 4.900% Note due 2017 (filed
as Exhibit 4.3 to LIIs Current Report on Form 8-K and
incorporated herein by reference). |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Subsidiary Joinder Agreement dated as of March 28, 2011, executed by Advanced Distributor Products LLC, a
Delaware LLC, for the benefit of Bank of America, N.A. in its capacity as administrative agent (Administrative
Agent) for the lenders party to the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated October 12, 2007, among
the Administrative Agent, LII (the Borrower), the lenders party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Wachovia
Bank, National Association, as Co-Syndication Agents, The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd, and Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A., as Co-Documentation Agents, and U.S. Bank National Association and The Bank of Nova Scotia, as
Co-Managing Agents and Banc of America Securities LLC and J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. as Joint Lead Arrangers
and Joint Book Managers (as amended, the Credit Agreement) (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Subsidiary Joinder Agreement dated as of March 28, 2011, executed by Heatcraft Inc., a Mississippi corporation,
for the benefit of Bank of America, N.A. in its capacity as administrative agent for the lenders party to the
Credit Agreement (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Subsidiary Joinder Agreement dated as of March 28, 2011, executed by Heatcraft Refrigeration Products LLC, a
Delaware LLC, for the benefit of Bank of America, N.A. in its capacity as administrative agent for the lenders
party to the Credit Agreement (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of the principal executive officer (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of the principal financial officer (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 (filed herewith). |
Exhibit No. (101).INS* XBRL Instance Document
Exhibit No. (101).SCH* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
Exhibit No. (101).CAL* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
Exhibit No. (101).LAB* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
Exhibit No. (101).PRE* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
37
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
LENNOX INTERNATIONAL INC.
|
|
Date: April 26, 2011 |
/s/ Robert W. Hau
|
|
|
|
|
Robert W. Hau |
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(on behalf of registrant and as principal
financial officer) |
|
|
38